diff options
| author | www-data <www-data@mail.pglaf.org> | 2025-12-18 13:26:05 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | www-data <www-data@mail.pglaf.org> | 2025-12-18 13:26:05 -0800 |
| commit | 72bde8c7a1d098191a9036bcffa2bbbc1fdb1490 (patch) | |
| tree | 17150366ea8860beafd3e2385c448902d1c3d065 /77498-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '77498-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/77498-h.htm | 21841 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/cover.jpg | bin | 0 -> 169728 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate01.jpg | bin | 0 -> 231455 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate02.jpg | bin | 0 -> 238669 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate03.jpg | bin | 0 -> 239463 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate04.jpg | bin | 0 -> 252228 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate05.jpg | bin | 0 -> 247425 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate06.jpg | bin | 0 -> 251227 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate07.jpg | bin | 0 -> 258732 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate08.jpg | bin | 0 -> 258869 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate09.jpg | bin | 0 -> 256121 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate10.jpg | bin | 0 -> 243149 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate11.jpg | bin | 0 -> 255195 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate12.jpg | bin | 0 -> 254338 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate13.jpg | bin | 0 -> 249829 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate14.jpg | bin | 0 -> 248382 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate15.jpg | bin | 0 -> 233201 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate16.jpg | bin | 0 -> 247923 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate17.jpg | bin | 0 -> 213227 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate18.jpg | bin | 0 -> 225848 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate19.jpg | bin | 0 -> 254520 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate20.jpg | bin | 0 -> 247459 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate21.jpg | bin | 0 -> 245016 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate22.jpg | bin | 0 -> 251806 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate23.jpg | bin | 0 -> 249485 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate24.jpg | bin | 0 -> 251724 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate25.jpg | bin | 0 -> 240591 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate26.jpg | bin | 0 -> 246131 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate27.jpg | bin | 0 -> 249322 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate28.jpg | bin | 0 -> 242831 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate29.jpg | bin | 0 -> 253248 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate30.jpg | bin | 0 -> 239580 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate31.jpg | bin | 0 -> 245917 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate32.jpg | bin | 0 -> 252849 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate33.jpg | bin | 0 -> 248314 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate34.jpg | bin | 0 -> 251818 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate35.jpg | bin | 0 -> 251274 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate36.jpg | bin | 0 -> 249591 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate37.jpg | bin | 0 -> 242584 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate38.jpg | bin | 0 -> 251572 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate39.jpg | bin | 0 -> 232078 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate40.jpg | bin | 0 -> 253485 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate41.jpg | bin | 0 -> 236039 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate42.jpg | bin | 0 -> 255000 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate43.jpg | bin | 0 -> 249881 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate44.jpg | bin | 0 -> 249463 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate45.jpg | bin | 0 -> 224323 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate46.jpg | bin | 0 -> 245482 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate47.jpg | bin | 0 -> 246985 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate48.jpg | bin | 0 -> 254851 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate49.jpg | bin | 0 -> 243074 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate50.jpg | bin | 0 -> 239507 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate51.jpg | bin | 0 -> 235391 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate52.jpg | bin | 0 -> 250408 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate53.jpg | bin | 0 -> 240834 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate54.jpg | bin | 0 -> 251122 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate55.jpg | bin | 0 -> 240535 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate56.jpg | bin | 0 -> 254555 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate57.jpg | bin | 0 -> 235386 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate58.jpg | bin | 0 -> 236389 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate59.jpg | bin | 0 -> 226256 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate60.jpg | bin | 0 -> 206777 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate61.jpg | bin | 0 -> 239399 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate62.jpg | bin | 0 -> 244646 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate63.jpg | bin | 0 -> 243738 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate64.jpg | bin | 0 -> 241550 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate65.jpg | bin | 0 -> 244164 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 77498-h/images/i_plate66.jpg | bin | 0 -> 242140 bytes |
68 files changed, 21841 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/77498-h/77498-h.htm b/77498-h/77498-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..34545ce --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/77498-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,21841 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html lang="en"> +<head> + <meta charset="UTF-8"> + <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> + <title> + Life histories of North American shore birds | Project Gutenberg + </title> + <link rel="icon" href="images/cover.jpg" type="image/x-cover"> + <style> + +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +/* Heading Styles */ + /* h1,h2,h3 { + text-align: center; + text-indent: 0em; + clear: both; + font-weight: bold; + page-break-before: avoid;} + */ +h1 { margin: 1em 5% 1em; + font-size: 150%; + font-family: sans-serif; + font-weight: normal; + text-align: left; + text-indent: 0;} +h2 { /* use for chapter headings */ + margin: 2em 5% 1em; + text-align: center; + text-indent: 0; + font-family: sans-serif; + font-size: 140%; + font-weight: normal;} +h3 { margin: 4em 5% 1em; + text-align: left; + text-indent: 0; + font-family: sans-serif; + font-size: 130%; + font-weight: normal; + text-indent: 0;} + +.nobreak {page-break-before: avoid;} + +.h1right { + clear: both; + margin: -1em 5% 1em; + font-size: 150%; + font-family: sans-serif; + font-weight: normal; + text-align: right;} +.h2head { /* use for chapter headings */ + margin: 2em 5% 1em; + text-align: center; + text-indent: 0; + font-size: 140%; + font-weight: normal;} + +div.chapter {page-break-before: always; + margin-top: 4em;} + +/* Paragraph styles */ +p { text-indent: 1.25em; + margin-top: .51em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .49em; +} +.p2 {margin-top: 2em;} + +.unindent {text-indent: 0em; + margin-top: .51em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .49em;} +.center {text-align: center; + text-indent: 0em;} +.right {text-align: right;} +.r4 { margin-right: 4em; } + +blockquote { + margin-top: 0; + margin-bottom: 0; + margin-left: 5%; + margin-right: 10%; + font-size:90%; +} + +/* Font styles */ +.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} +.allsmcap {font-variant: small-caps; text-transform: lowercase;} +em {font-weight:bold;} +.smaller {font-size: 83%;} +.larger {font-size: 120%;} +.ls {letter-spacing: .25em; + margin-right: -0.25em;} +.muchlarger {font-size: 140%;} +.sansserif {font-family: sans-serif;} + +/* Links */ +a { border:none; text-decoration:none; font-variant:normal; } +a:visited {text-decoration:none; color: red;} +a:link {text-decoration:none;} /* no UL of any links - useful for html accessibility */ +abbr { border:none; text-decoration:none; font-variant:normal; } + +/* Rules */ +hr { + width: 33%; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + margin-left: 33.5%; + margin-right: 33.5%; + clear: both; +} + +hr.chap {width: 65%; margin-left: 17.5%; margin-right: 17.5%;} +@media print { hr.chap {display: none; visibility: hidden;} } + +/* Lists and Indices */ +ul.index { list-style-type: none; } +li.ifrst { + margin-top: 1em; + text-indent: -2em; + padding-left: 1em; +} +li.indx { + margin-top: .5em; + text-indent: -2em; + padding-left: 1em; +} +li.isub1 { + text-indent: -2em; + padding-left: 2em; +} +li.isub2 { + text-indent: -2em; + padding-left: 3em; +} + +/* Tables */ +table { + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + text-align: center; +} +.tdl {text-align: left;} +.tdr {text-align: right;} +.tdh {vertical-align: top; /* hanging indent for TOC and Index*/ + text-align: left; + text-indent: -1em; + padding-left: 5em;} +.pad1 {padding: 0 0 0 2em;} /* TOC family */ +.pad3 {padding: 0 0 0 6em;} /* TOC habits distribution */ +.vlb {vertical-align: bottom;} + +/* Page numbers */ +.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */ + /* visibility: hidden; */ + position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: 50%; + text-align: right; + font-style: normal; + font-weight: normal; + font-variant: normal; + text-indent: 0; + color: #444; +} + +figcaption {font-weight: normal; + font-size: 90%; + text-align: justify;} +/* +figcaption p {margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: .2em; + page-break-before: avoid; + text-align: left;} +*/ +/* Images */ + +img { + max-width: 100%; + max-height: 90%; +} +img.w100 {width: 100%;} + +.figcenter { + margin: auto; + text-align: center; + page-break-inside: avoid; + max-width: 100%; +} + +/* Footnotes */ +.footnotes {border: 1px dashed;} + +.footnote {margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + font-size: 0.9em; + text-indent: 0;} + +.footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;} + +.fnanchor { + vertical-align: super; + font-size: .8em; + text-decoration: none; +} + +/* Transcriber's notes */ +.transnote {background-color: #E6E6FA; + color: black; + font-size:small; + padding:0.5em; + margin-bottom:5em; +} + +/* Illustration classes */ +.illowp41 {width: 41%;} /* plates 15 17 27 28 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp41 {width: 100%;} +.illowp42 {width: 42%;} /* plate 21 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp42 {width: 100%;} +.illowp43 {width: 43%;} /* plates 22 25 46 60 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp43 {width: 100%;} +.illowp44 {width: 44%;} /* plates 16 20 23 30 43 54 59 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp44 {width: 100%;} +.illowp45 {width: 45%;} /* plates 18 47 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp45 {width: 100%;} +.illowp46 {width: 46%;} /* plates 5 11 12 13 26 32 33 35 51 52 53 58 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp46 {width: 100%;} +.illowp47 {width: 47%;} /* plates 2 3 4 6 10 19 31 38 41 42 44 45 50 56 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp47 {width: 100%;} +.illowp48 {width: 48%;} /* plates 1 14 24 36 48 49 66 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp48 {width: 100%;} +.illowp49 {width: 49%;} /* plates 39 40 64 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp49 {width: 100%;} +.illowp50 {width: 50%;} /* plates 29 34 61 65 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp50 {width: 100%;} +.illowp52 {width: 52%;} /* plate 9 */ +.x-ebookmaker .illowp52 {width: 100%;} +.illowp100 {width: 100%;} /* plates 7 8 37 55 57 62 63 */ + </style> + </head> +<body> +<div style='text-align:center'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 77498 ***</div> + +<p>Transcriber’s Note:</p> +<div class="transnote"> +<p class="center"> +In Memory of<br> +<br> +Chris Curnow<br> +(1937–2023)<br> +the Project Manager at Distributed Proofreaders<br> +who selected this book,<br> +and more than 2200 others,<br> +to be preserved as free digital transcriptions<br> +by Project Gutenberg. +</p> +</div> + +<p>The source scans used are from the Dover edition, published +in 1962, an unabridged republication of the work first published by +the United States Government Printing Office. Part I was originally +published in 1927 as Smithsonian Institution United States National +Museum Bulletin 142; Part II was originally published in 1929 as +Smithsonian Institution United States National Museum Bulletin 146. In +Part II, the Smithsonian publication used Plate 1 as a frontispiece. +The Dover edition included Plate 1 with the rest of the plates at the +end of the book.</p> + +<p>Footnotes were renumbered sequentially. Obsolete and alternative +spellings were not changed.</p> + +<p>Misspelled words were corrected. Missing diacriticals were added. +Obvious printing errors, such as partially printed letters and +punctuation, were corrected. Final stops missing at the end of +sentences and abbreviations were added.</p> +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_i">[Pg i]</span></p> + +<div class="chapter"> +<h1> +<i>Life Histories of North American</i> +</h1> +<p class="h1right"><span class="sansserif"><i>Shore Birds</i></span> +</p> + +<h2 class=" nobreak x-ebookmaker-important"><i>By Arthur Cleveland Bent</i></h2> +<h2><i>in two parts - Part II</i></h2> +<h3><span class="sansserif"><i>Dover Publications, Inc.,   New York</i></span></h3> +</div> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_ii">[Pg ii]</span></p> + +<p class="center"> +ADVERTISEMENT +</p> +</div> +<p>The scientific publications of the National Museum include two +series, known, respectively, as <cite>Proceedings</cite> and <cite>Bulletin</cite>.</p> + +<p>The <cite>Proceedings</cite>, begun in 1878, is intended primarily as a medium +for the publication of original papers, based on the collections of +the National Museum, that set forth newly acquired facts in biology, +anthropology, and geology, with descriptions of new forms and +revisions of limited groups. Copies of each paper, in pamphlet +form, are distributed as published to libraries and scientific organizations +and to specialists and others interested in the different +subjects. The dates at which these separate papers are published are +recorded in the table of contents of each of the volumes.</p> + +<p>The <cite>Bulletin</cite>, the first of which was issued in 1875, consists of a +series of separate publications comprising monographs of large +zoological groups and other general systematic treatises (occasionally +in several volumes), faunal works, reports of expeditions, catalogues +of type-specimens, special collections, and other material of +similar nature. The majority of the volumes are octavo in size, but +a quarto size has been adopted in a few instances in which large +plates were regarded as indispensable. In the <cite>Bulletin</cite> series appear +volumes under the heading <cite>Contributions from the United States +National Herbarium</cite>, in octavo form, published by the National +Museum since 1902, which contain papers relating to the botanical +collections of the Museum.</p> + +<p>The present work forms <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 146 of the <cite>Bulletin</cite> series.</p> + +<p class="right"> + <span style="margin-right: 4em;"><span class="smcap">Alexander Wetmore</span>,</span><br> + <i>Assistant Secretary, Smithsonian Institution</i>. +</p> +<p><span class="smcap">Washington, D. C.</span>, <i>December 11, 1928</i>.</p> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> +<div class="chapter"> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_iii">[Pg iii]</span></p> +<h2 style="display: none; visibility: hidden;">Table of Contents</h2> + <p class="h2head"> + TABLE OF CONTENTS + </p> +</div> + +<hr> + +<table> +<tr><td colspan="2" class="tdr">Page</td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl">Order Limicolae</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad1">Family Scolopacidae</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Tringa solitaria solitaria</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Solitary sandpiper</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_9">9</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Tringa solitaria cinnamomea</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Western">13</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Western solitary sandpiper</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Western">13</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Western">13</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_15">15</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Tringa ocrophus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Green">16</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Green sandpiper</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Green">16</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Green">16</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_21">21</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Rhyacophilus glareola</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Wood">22</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Wood sandpiper</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Wood">22</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Wood">22</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_26">26</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Catoptrophorus semipalmatus semipalmatus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb pad1"><a href="#Eastern">27</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Eastern willet</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Eastern">27</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Eastern">27</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_35">35</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Catoptrophorus semipalmatus inornatus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#W_willet">36</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Western willet</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#W_willet">36</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#W_willet">36</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_39">39</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Heteroscelus incanus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Wander">41</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Wandering tattler</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Wander">41</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Wander">41</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_46">46</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Heteroscelus brevipes</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Polynesian tattler</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_49">49</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Philomachus pugnax</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Ruff">49</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Ruff</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Ruff">49</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Ruff">49</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_54">54</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Bartramia longicauda</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Upland">55</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Upland plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Upland">55</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Upland">55</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_65">65</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Tryngites subruficollis</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Buff">69</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tdh">Buff-breasted sandpiper</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Buff">69</a> + <span class="pagenum" id="Page_iv">[Pg iv]</span></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Buff">69</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_76">76</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Actitis macularia</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Spotted">78</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Spotted sandpiper</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Spotted">78</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Spotted">78</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_93">93</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Numenius americanus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Long">97</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Long-billed curlew</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Long">97</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Long">97</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_106">106</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Numenius arquata arquata</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#European">109</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">European curlew</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#European">109</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#European">109</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_112">112</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Numenius hudsonicus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Hudson">113</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Hudsonian curlew</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Hudson">113</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Hudson">113</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_122">122</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Numenius borealis</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Eskimo">125</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Eskimo curlew</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Eskimo">125</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Eskimo">125</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_134">134</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Numenius phaeopus phaeopus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Whimbrel">136</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Whimbrel</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Whimbrel">136</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Whimbrel">136</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_139">139</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Numenius tahitiensis</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Bristle">140</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Bristle-thighed curlew</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Bristle">140</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Bristle">140</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_143">143</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad1">Family Charadriidae</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_144">144</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Vanellus-vanellus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_144">144</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Lapwing</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_144">144</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_144">144</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_148">148</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Eudromias morinellus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Dotterel">150</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Dotterel</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Dotterel">150</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Dotterel">150</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_153">153</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Squatarola squatarola</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_154">154</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Black-bellied plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_154">154</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_154">154</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_166">166</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Pluvialis apricaria altifrons</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Golden">171</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">European golden plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Golden">171</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Golden">171</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_174">174</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Pluvialis dominica dominica</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Am_gold">175</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">American golden plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Am_gold">175</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Am_gold">175</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_189">189</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tdh">Pluvialis dominica fulva</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Pac_gold">193</a> + <span class="pagenum" id="Page_v">[Pg v]</span></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Pacific golden plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Pac_gold">193</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Pac_gold">193</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_201">201</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Oxyechus vociferus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Killdeer">202</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Killdeer</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Killdeer">202</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Killdeer">202</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_213">213</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Charadrius semipalmatus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Semi">217</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Semipalmated plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Semi">217</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Semi">217</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_225">225</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Charadrius hiaticula</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Ringed">229</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Ringed plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Ringed">229</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Ringed">229</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_232">232</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Charadrius dubius curonicus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Little">233</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Little ringed plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Little">233</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Little">233</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_236">236</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Charadrius melodus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Piping">236</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Piping plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Piping">236</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Piping">236</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_244">244</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Charadrius nivosus nivosus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Snowy">246</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Snowy plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Snowy">246</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Snowy">246</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_251">251</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Charadrius nivosus tenuirostris</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Cuban">252</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Cuban snowy plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Cuban">252</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Cuban">252</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Charadrius mongolus mongolus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Mongol">253</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Mongolian plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Mongol">253</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Mongol">253</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_256">256</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Pagolla wilsonia wilsonia</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_257">257</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Wilson plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_257">257</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_257">257</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_262">262</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Podasocys montanus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Mtn">263</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Mountain plover</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Mtn">263</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Mtn">263</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_267">267</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad1">Family Aphrizidae</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#APHRIZIDAE">269</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Aphriza virgata</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#APHRIZIDAE">269</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Surf bird</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#APHRIZIDAE">269</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#APHRIZIDAE">269</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_277">277</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Arenaria interpres</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Turnstone">278</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Turnstone</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Turnstone">278</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Turnstone">278</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#interpres">293</a></td></tr> + +<tr><td class="tdh">Arenaria interpres interpres</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#interpres">293</a> + <span class="pagenum" id="Page_vi">[Pg vi]</span></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Arenaria interpres morinella</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#morinella">294</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Arenaria melanocephala</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Bl_turnstone">298</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Black turnstone</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Bl_turnstone">298</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Bl_turnstone">298</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_304">304</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad1">Family Haematopodidae</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#HAEMATOPODIDAE">305</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Haematopus ostralegus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#HAEMATOPODIDAE">305</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">European oyster catcher</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#HAEMATOPODIDAE">305</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#HAEMATOPODIDAE">305</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_308">308</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Haematopus palliatus palliatus</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Am_oyster">309</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">American oyster catcher</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Am_oyster">309</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Am_oyster">309</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_315">315</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Haematopus palliatus frazari</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Frazer">316</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Frazer oyster catcher</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Frazer">316</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Frazer">316</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_319">319</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Haematopus bachmani</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_320">320</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Black oyster catcher</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_320">320</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_320">320</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_323">323</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad1">Family Jacanidae</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_324">324</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Jacana spinosa gymnostoma</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_324">324</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdh">Mexican jacana</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_324">324</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Habits</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_324">324</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl pad3">Distribution</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_327">327</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl">References to publications</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_328">328</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl">Explanation of plates</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_341">341</a></td></tr> +<tr><td class="tdl">Index</td> + <td class="tdr vlb"><a href="#Page_407">407</a></td></tr> +</table> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_vii">[Pg vii]</span></p> +<h2 style="display: none; visibility: hidden;">Introduction</h2> + <p class="h2head"> + INTRODUCTION + </p> +</div> + +<p>This is the eighth in a series of bulletins of the United States +National Museum on the life histories of North American birds. +Previous numbers have been issued as follows:</p> + +<p>107. Life Histories of North American Diving Birds, August 1, +1919.</p> + +<p>113. Life Histories of North American Gulls and Terns, August +27, 1921.</p> + +<p>121. Life Histories of North American Petrels, Pelicans and their +Allies, October 19, 1922.</p> + +<p>126. Life Histories of North American Wild Fowl, May 25, 1923.</p> + +<p>130. Life Histories of North American Wild Fowl, June 27, 1925.</p> + +<p>135. Life Histories of North American Marsh Birds, March 11, +1927.</p> + +<p>142. Life Histories of North American Shore Birds, December 31, +1927.</p> + +<p>The same general plan has been followed, as explained in previous +bulletins, and the same sources of information have been utilized. +The classification and nomenclature adopted by the American Ornithologists’ +Union, in its latest check list and its supplements, have +been followed, mainly, with such few changes as, in the author’s +opinion, will be, or should be, made to bring the work up to date and +in line with recent advances in the science.</p> + +<p>The main ranges are as accurately outlined as limited space will +permit; the normal migrations are given in sufficient detail to indicate +the usual movements of the species; no attempt has been made to +give all the records, for economy in space, and no pretence at complete +perfection is claimed. Many published records, often repeated, have +been investigated and discarded; many apparently doubtful records +have been verified; some published records, impossible to either +verify or disprove, have been accepted if the evidence seemed to +warrant it.</p> + +<p>The egg dates are the condensed results of a mass of records taken +from the data in a large number of the best egg collections in the country, +as well as from contributed field notes and from a few published +sources. They indicate the dates on which eggs have been actually +found in various parts of the country, showing the earliest and latest +dates and the limits between which half the dates fall, the height of +the season.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_viii">[Pg viii]</span></p> +<p>The plumages are described in only enough detail to enable the +reader to trace the sequence of molts and plumages from birth to +maturity and to recognize the birds in the different stages and at the +different seasons. No attempt has been made to fully describe adult +plumages; this has been already well done in the many manuals. +The names of colors, when in quotation marks, are taken from Ridgway’s +Color Standards and Nomenclature (1912) and the terms used +to describe the shapes of eggs are taken from his Nomenclature of +Colors (1886 edition). The heavy-faced type in the measurements +of eggs indicate the four extremes of measurements.</p> + +<p>Many of those who contributed material for former volumes have +rendered a similar service in this case. In addition to those whose +contributions have been acknowledged previously, our thanks are due +to the following new contributors: Photographs, notes, or data have +been contributed by E. G. Alexander, C. M. Beal, W. W. Bennett, +A. D. Boyle, W. J. Brown, M. H. Burroughs, J. J. Carroll, N. W. +Cayley, Ralph Chislett, W. M. Congreve, S. J. Darcus, H. G. +Deignare, Jonathan Dwight, F. F. Gander, T. S. Gillin, W. E. Glegg, +S. P. Gordon, Frank Grasett, R. W. Harding, L. L. Haskin, E. A. +Hyer, T. A. James, F. Kermode, H. M. Laing, Carl Lien, G. H. +Lings, Julian Lyder, S. H. Lyman, M. J. Magee, Miss M. E. McLellan, +F. C. Pellett, R. T. Peterson, H. H. Pittman, C. A. Proctor, +J. C. Salyer, A. W. Schorger, Althea R. Sherman, L. W. Smith, +E. L. Sumner, jr., Malcolm Taylor, jr., R. M. Thorburn, C. H. +Townsend, Josselyn Van Tyne, Stanton Warburton, jr., Alexander +Wetmore, F. N. Wilson, L. R. Wolfe.</p> + +<p>Receipt of material from over 275 contributors has been acknowledged +in previous volumes.</p> + +<p>Through the courtesy of the Biological Survey, the services of +Frederick C. Lincoln were again secured to compile the distribution +paragraphs. With the matchless reference files of the Biological +Survey at his disposal and with some advice and help from Dr. +Harry C. Oberholser, his many hours of careful and thorough work +have produced results far more satisfactory than could have been +attained by the author, who claims no credit and assumes no +responsibility for this part of the work.</p> + +<p>Dr. Charles W. Townsend has contributed the life histories of +two species; the Rev. Francis C. R. Jourdain has furnished valuable +notes for two, has written nine new life histories and two of his have +been transferred from the previous volume; and Dr. Winsor M. +Tyler has contributed two life histories. The author is much indebted +to Dr. Charles W. Richmond for many hours of careful and +sympathetic work in reading the proof and correcting errors in this +and all previous volumes; his expert knowledge has been of great +value.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_ix">[Pg ix]</span></p> +<p>As most of the shore birds are known to us mainly, or entirely, as +migrants, it has seemed desirable to describe their migrations quite +fully. As it is a well-known fact that many, if not all, immature and +nonbreeding shore birds remain far south of their breeding ranges all +summer, it has not seemed necessary to mention this in each case. +Nor did it seem necessary to say that only one brood is raised in a +season, as this is a nearly universal rule with all water birds.</p> + +<p>The manuscript for this volume was completed in April, 1928. +Contributions received since then will be acknowledged later. Only +information of great importance could be added. When this volume +appears, contributions of photographs or notes relating to the +Raptores should be sent to</p> + +<p class="right r4"> + <span class="smcap">The Author</span>. +</p> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</span></p> +<p class="center"> +<span class="larger">LIFE HISTORIES OF NORTH AMERICAN SHORE +BIRDS</span><br> +<br> +ORDER LIMICOLAE (PART 2)</p> +<hr> +<p class="center"> +By <span class="smcap">Arthur Cleveland Bent</span><br> +<i>Of Taunton, Massachusetts</i></p> +<hr> + +<p class="center">Family SCOLOPACIDAE, Snipes and Sandpipers<br> +</p> +<hr> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">TRINGA SOLITARIA SOLITARIA</span> <span class="smaller">Wilson</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">SOLITARY SANDPIPER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span> +</p> +</div> + +<p>This dainty “woodland tattler” is associated in my mind with +some secluded, shady woodland pool in early autumn, where the +summer drought has exposed broad muddy shores and where the +brightly tinted leaves of the swamp maple float lightly on the still +water. Here the solitary wader may be seen, gracefully poised on +some fallen log, nodding serenely, or walking gracefully over the +mud or in the shallow water. Seldom disturbed by man, it hardly +seems to heed his presence; it may raise its wings, displaying their +pretty linings, or it may flit lightly away to the other side of the +pool, with a few sharp notes of protest and a flash of white in its +tail. I have often seen it in other places where one would not expect +to find shore birds, such as the muddy banks of a sluggish stream, +somewhat polluted with sewage, which flows back of my garden in +the center of the city, or some barnyard mud puddle, reeking with +the filth of cattle; perhaps it is attracted to such unsavory places by +the swarms of flies that it finds there.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The solitary sandpiper arrives in the United States during +the latter part of March, but it makes slow progress northward, +for it does not reach New England until May. We generally see it +singly, in pairs, or in small numbers, but according to William +Brewster (1925) it sometimes occurs in favorable localities, near +Umbagog Lake, Maine, in large numbers; he writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>According to an entry in my journal I saw them there literally in “swarms” +on May 20, 1880, when, as we advanced by way of the river in a boat, they were +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</span>ceaselessly rising and flitting on ahead, uttering their <i>peet-weet</i> calls, and also +making a faint yet noticeable rustling sound with their wings. Thus driven +they sometimes alighted, one after another, on some muddy point, until as +many as seven assembled within the space of a few square feet. Nevertheless, +they were for the most part paired, and the mated birds almost invariably +kept together, and apart from all the rest when on wing.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The migration in the interior seems to be at least two or three +weeks earlier. E. W. Hadeler tells me that in Lake County, Ohio, +one is almost sure to find it, on the river where the sewer empties +into it, between April 22 and May 18. Many must pass through +the inland States in April, for Edward S. Thomas has recorded it +in Ohio as early as March 30 and calls the average date of arrival +April 15. A. G. Lawrence has recorded it in southern Manitoba as +early as April 29 and it reaches its northernmost breeding grounds +in Mackenzie and Alaska soon after the middle of May.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—Dr. John B. May has sent me the following notes on +a courtship display of this species which he saw in New Hampshire:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Paddling down river one day, probably between the 8th and 15th of June, I +saw several pairs of solitary and spotted sandpipers where the muddy banks +were exposed, near a swamp where bitterns breed. Both species were apparently +courting, making considerable noise and showing their white feathers +in display. Every little while one of the solitary sandpipers would fly up +slowly into the air, only rising a few feet, and rising slowly with rapidly +beating or quivering wings, giving a twittering whistle and spreading the +tail so that the outer white feathers were very conspicuous. Then it would +drop back to the mud again near where it rose. The time taken in rising a +few feet would have carried it some distance with its ordinary flight.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The nesting habits of this sandpiper long remained +a mystery or were misunderstood. In looking over the literature on +the subject I came across no less than seven published records of +nests found on the ground and said to be positively identified as +this species. These were all published prior to the discovery of the +now well-known habit of nesting in the deserted nests of passerine +birds. Not a single one of these records seems to be substantiated by +an available specimen of the parent bird. The solitary sandpiper +may occasionally nest on the ground, but it is yet to be proven.</p> + +<p>To Evan Thomson belongs the credit for making the interesting +discovery of the tree-nesting habit. This historic incident is described +by J. Fletcher Street (1923) as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Mr. Thomson many years ago took up a quarter section of land under the +Canadian homestead act, built himself a log cabin at the edge of a muskeg, +and commenced the arduous task of clearing the land. Living alone in this +wilderness without neighbors and possessing a keen love for nature and a +particular interest in the abundant wild life about him, he came to devote +his spare moments to the study of birds, counting as his immediate associates +such hermit species as the great-horned owl, long-eared owl, saw-whet owl, +goshawk, and a large host of water fowl and waders. Seated one day before +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</span>his cabin he noticed a bird fly to a low tamarack and enter a nest. It was +ostensibly one of the waders, and great was his surprise upon examining the +nest to find it the structure of a robin. It contained four beautiful eggs, +greenish white in ground color and heavily spotted and blotched with reddish +brown. Thus, on June 16, 1903, the first authentic eggs of the solitary sandpiper +were taken but it was not until a year later that the identity of the +bird was definitely established. It was indeed interesting, 20 years later, +to be shown the cabin and to view the original tree from which the eggs were +collected. Subsequent to the finding of this nest many others have been +located, the bird evidencing no particular choice of nest in which to deposit +its eggs, the list including those of the bronzed grackle, Brewer’s blackbird, +cedar waxwing, kingbird, robin, and Canada jay. These have been found +at an elevation as low as 4 feet and as high as 40 and in locations contiguous +to water and as far away as 200 yards.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Walter Raine (1904), for whom Mr. Thomson was collecting eggs +at the time, was the first to publish the important news, but he waited +a year until another nest was found and the parent bird shot. The +following year, 1904, Mr. Thomson found two more nests and shot +the parent bird from the last one. Mr. Raine (1904) then published +a full account of all three nests, each of which contained four eggs. +The first nest, taken June 16, 1903, was “an old nest of the American +robin, built 15 feet up in a tamarack tree, that was growing in the +middle of a large muskeg, dotted with tamaracks.” The second was +found on June 9, 1904, an old “nest of a bronzed grackle, built in +a low tree.” The third set was taken on June 24, 1904, and the parent +bird was shot, as she flew from “the nest of a cedar waxwing, which +was built in a small spruce tree growing in a swamp, the nest being +about 5 feet from the water.” Since then numerous other nests have +been found in similar situations. A. D. Henderson (1923) reported +a nest found in 1914, about a “dozen feet up in a poplar tree,” and +on June 7, 1922, a set of eggs was taken for him, with the parent, +by a young friend:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The nest was in a white birch tree, growing at the edge of the timber, on +the shore of a small lake, and about 150 yards from his home. A brood of +young robins had been raised in it last season, he told me. It was about 18 +feet from the ground and a typical robin’s nest, of grass and mud. The inside +lining of grass was gone and the eggs lay in the bare mud cup, no material +being added by the sandpiper, which I identified as the eastern form of the +bird.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Henderson and Richard C. Harlow took a set of four fresh +eggs on May 30, 1923, near Belvedere, Alberta, from an old robin’s +nest 10 feet up in a scrubby spruce, 30 feet high, on the muskeg +border of a swampy lake. A nest found by Messrs. Street (1923) +and Stuart, near Red Lodge, Alberta, on May 29, 1923, was also an +old robin’s nest only 4 feet from the ground in an 8-foot spruce, in +a muskeg surrounded by spruces and tamaracks.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</span></p> + +<p>Mr. Henderson tells me that he thinks he now understands the +nesting habits of this species more thoroughly, for he has found +five sets of eggs this season, 1927. He says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The principal breeding place seems to be around small lakes or ponds in +muskegs; and the bird they are chiefly associated with is the rusty blackbird, +which also breeds among the same surroundings, and whose nests are as suitable +for the solitary sandpiper as are those of the robin. A few breed around +lakes and sloughs, away from the muskegs, but the main body is in the muskeg +country associated with the rusty blackbird.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The solitary sandpiper lays almost invariably four eggs; +I believe there is only one set of five recorded. They are ovate +pyriform in shape, with a slight gloss, and the shell is very fragile. +There are two distinct types of ground color, green and buff. These +two types are well illustrated by the Rev. F. C. R. Jourdain (1907) +in an excellent colored plate. In the green type the ground colors +vary from “pale glaucous green,” or “pale turtle green,” to greenish +white; and in the buff type, from “cream buff” to “cartridge buff.” +They are rather thickly spotted and blotched with irregular markings, +usually more thickly about the larger end, where the spots are sometimes +confluent. The underlying spots and blotches in various shades +of “purple drab” and “heliotrope gray” are often quite conspicuous. +Over these the eggs are boldly marked with dark rich browns, “claret +brown,” “liver brown,” “bay” and “chocolate,” or even darker colors +where the pigment is thickest. One beautiful egg, figured by Mr. +Jourdain (1907), has a “pale glaucous green” ground color, with +only two blotches of very dark brown near the larger end, heavily +splashed elsewhere with “pallid purple drab,” and sparingly peppered +with light brown. The measurements of 68 eggs average 36 +by 25.5 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure +<b>38.5</b> by <b>27</b>, <b>33.7</b> by 23.8 and 36.1 by <b>23.6</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—I have never seen this species in natal down, but Ora +W. Knight (1908) says that “the downy young are a general grayish +buff above with darker suffusions on the back; a darker line through +each eye from bill to nape; darkish crown line; below white with +slight dusky suffusion on flanks.”</p> + +<p>Young birds in juvenal plumage are grayish brown above, lighter +and more olivaceous than in adults, and thickly spotted with white +or buffy white; the sides of the head and neck are grayish, indistinctly +streaked with dusky on the neck. A partial postjuvenal molt occurs +in the fall producing a first winter plumage, in which young birds +may be distinguished by retained juvenal wing coverts. Young birds +are also more profusely spotted on the upper parts and less distinctly +streaked on the neck and breast than adults. At the first prenuptial +molt, the following spring, the young bird becomes practically adult.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</span></p> + +<p>Adults have a partial prenuptial molt, between February and May, +involving the body plumage, the tail and some scapulars, wing coverts, +and tertials. The complete postnuptial molt begins in July with +the change of the body plumage and may last through September, +but the primaries are not molted until the winter months, December +to February. The winter plumage is similar to the nuptial, but the +upper parts are grayer and less distinctly spotted; the neck and chest +are only very indistinctly streaked with grayish.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Dr. Elliott Coues (1874) has described the feeding habits +of solitary sandpipers so well that I can not do better than to quote +his words, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They differ from most of their relatives in their choice of feeding grounds or +of places where they usually alight to rest while migrating; a difference accompanied, +I suppose, by a corresponding modification in diet. Their favorite +resorts are the margins of small, stagnant pools, fringed with rank grass and +weeds; the miry, tide-water ditches that intersect marshes; and the soft, oozy +depressions in low meadows and water savannas. They frequent also the +interior of woods not too thick and collect there about the rain puddles, the +water of which is delayed in sinking by the matted layer of decaying leaves that +covers the ground. After heavy rains I have seen them running about like grass +plovers on open, level commons, covered only with short turf. They also have a +fancy, shared by few birds except the titlarks, for the pools of liquid manure +usually found in some out of the way place upon the thrifty farmer’s premises. +They find abundant food in all these places, aquatic insects of all sorts, and +especially their curious larvae, worms, grubs, and perhaps the smallest sorts of +molluscs; with all these they also take into their gizzards a quantity of sand +and gravel, to help along the grinding process. With food to be had in such +plenty with little labor the birds become, particularly in the fall, extremely fat.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Edward H. Forbush (1912) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In the fall, on its return from the north, it has a habit of wading into the +water in stagnant ditches or ponds, where it advances one foot at a time, and by +rapidly moving the forward foot stirs up the vegetation at the bottom ever so +slightly. This motion is so swift and delicate that the leg seems to be merely +trembling, as if the bird were chilled by contact with the water, but it is done +with intent to disturb insects among the algae at the bottom without roiling the +water, and the eager bird, leaning forward, plunges in its bill and head, sometimes +to the eyes, and catches the alarmed water insects as they dart away. +I have watched this carefully with a glass while lying in the grass only 10 or 12 +feet from the bird. It is easy by stirring the bottom slightly with a stick to +cause a similar movement of the water insects, but I never could agitate it so +delicately as to avoid clouding the water with sediment from the bottom.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Giraud (1844) says that “on the wing it is very active, and is sometimes +seen darting after winged insects, which it is expert in catching.” +Other observers have noted in its food various insects and their +larvae, dragon-fly nymphs, water-scavenger beetles, water boatmen, +grasshoppers, caterpillars, spiders, worms, small crustaceans, and +small frogs.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</span></p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The solitary sandpiper is always light, graceful, and +dainty in all its movements. In spite of the unsavory places in which +it often feeds, its trim figure is always neat and clean. In flight it is +light and airy as it flits away for a short distance, only to alight +again and lift its prettily lined wings high above its back before folding +them. It flies higher than the spotted sandpiper and more +swiftly, often in a zigzag manner, a trick probably learned by dodging +branches in the woods, and the wings are raised well above the +body on the upward stroke.</p> + +<p>Walter H. Rich (1907) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>There is scarcely another bird which flies with so little apparent effort. +His strokes are slow and regular, a short sailing between each motion, but he +moves very fast. Let him be alarmed and he will quicken his speed until he +seems only a black streak in the air, and as he rises to top the surrounding +trees it needs good and quick work with the gun to stop him.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>It frequently indulges in a peculiar tilting and nodding habit, +similar to that of the spotted sandpiper, but it is more deliberate +and not so pronounced; it seems to be more of a bow than a tip-up +more like the bobbing of the yellowlegs. It moves about rather +sluggishly, wading in shallow water or even standing motionless, +where its colors blend into its dark background and make it difficult +to see. If it wades beyond its depth, it swims readily and can +even dive to escape its enemies. John T. Nichols says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In feeding it frequently lowers the head with a drilling motion, especially +when immersing its bill in the water, apparently probing in the mud at such +times, whereas as a rule our tattlers feed by snatching. It frequently stops +to scratch its head with one foot. When bathing it ducks and splashes and sits +in the water soaking, and at the conclusion of the bath, trips out onto the +mud, raises the wings once or twice, and preens itself thoroughly. I have +seen a solitary, alighted in a pool on the marsh, preening its feathers without +dipping its bill in the water, and am not aware whether it has this bill-dipping +habit common with some of its relatives.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Harrison F. Lewis has sent me the following notes on the rather +peculiar behavior of a solitary sandpiper which he watched for some +time:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The sandpiper, which was well aware that I was watching it, stepped +slowly out onto the open surface of the mud of the bog, and, standing there +with its left side toward me, repeated several times the following curious +actions. It spread its wings about halfway, holding them stiffly in the plane +of its back, neither raised nor lowered, so that the dark markings on its +axillards were slightly visible. At the same time it drew its head as far backward +and its tail as far forward over its back as possible, and slowly lowered +its breast until it almost seemed to touch the mud. After remaining rigid +in this position for 10 to 15 seconds, it would suddenly relax and become its +normal self, only to repeat the entire procedure almost immediately. I could +think of no purpose for these actions, unless they were an attempt at concealment +by making the bird’s outlines and colors as unlike as possible to +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</span>those normally to be expected in a sandpiper. Although it did not conceal +itself from me by this means, it made itself appear extremely unlike a bird.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Solitary sandpipers are usually very tame and unsuspicious, often +to the verge of stupidity, as the following incident, related by +Doctor Coues (1874) well illustrates:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Once coming up to a fence that went past a little pool, and peeping through +the slats, I saw eight tattlers of this species wading about in the shallow +water, searching for food. I pulled trigger on one; the others set up a +simultaneous outcry, and I expected them, of course, to fly off, but they presently +quieted down and began feeding again. Without moving from my place, I +fired three times more, killing a single bird at each discharge; still no effect +upon the survivors, except as before. Then I climbed over the fence, and +stood in full view of the four remaining birds; they merely flapped to the +further side of the pool, and stood still looking at me, nodding away, as if +agreed that the whole thing was very singular. I stood and deliberately +loaded and fired three times more, taking one bird each time; and it was only +as I was ramming another charge, that the sole surviving bird concluded to +make off, which he did, I will add in justice to his wits, in a great hurry.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Brewster (1925) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Not less confiding than sluggish, they will usually allow a man to approach in +the open to within less than a dozen yards, and sometimes he may almost lay +his hands on young and inexperienced birds, while several of these may continue +to gaze at him with obviously serene unconcern immediately after he has +discharged his gun directly over their heads. There are times, however, especially +in calm weather, when the report of a gun, or the sound of one’s paddle +striking against the side of a boat, will instantly startle all the solitary sandpipers +within 20 rods, causing them to rise on wing with loud outcries, and to +fly off singly, in various directions, to more or less distant places. In summer +and autumn they invariably act thus independently of one another when flushed, +and also when engaged in feeding, although by no means averse to assembling +rather numerously where food is especially plentiful or easily obtained.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—Mr. Nichols has described this very satisfactorily, in his +notes, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The ordinary notes of the solitary sandpiper are very close to those of the +spotted, but probably always differentiable. They are sharper, cleaner cut, less +variable. The full-flight note is a sharp piping <i>peep weep weep</i>, more often +three than two syllabled when a bird is definitely leaving a locality, or by wandering +birds which ordinarily fly high. In birds flushed on, or making longer +or shorter flights to different parts of the same marsh where they were living, +the same note was usually double <i>peep weep</i>, rarely single.</p> + +<p>A quite dissimilar call, less frequently heard, is a fine <i>pit pit pit</i>, or <i>chi tit</i>. +This may have no significance other than being a reduction of the preceding, +when the bird is less definitely on the wing, but seems to depend on their being +another individual fairly close by. There is likely homology between it and the +short flocking call of the lesser yellowlegs, and if correctly determined, a certain +analogy thereto is also established, perhaps as much as possible with this non-social +species. Of similar quality was a peculiar <i>kikikiki</i> from one of two birds +in company which came to decoys nicely, as they went on past my rig without +alighting.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</span></p> + +<p>A third kind of note, isolated <i>pips</i>, suggesting the call of the water thrush, is +expressive of excitement when a bird is on the ground, as when just alighted.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The field characters are also well described by Mr. +Nichols, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In flight the under surface of the solitary sandpiper’s wings appears blackish. +Birds on the ground not infrequently raise the wings over the back, displaying +this mark to advantage. Its tail, spread when about to alight, appears white +with a contrasting dark center. When traveling in the air its flight is either +swift and darting or else resembles that of a yellowlegs, a little jerkier. When +about to alight it usually drops down abruptly, much as the Wilson’s snipe +does; and when flying only a few yards it has a peculiar jerky flight with +wings partially spread. On the ground it looks much like a yellowlegs, but is +darker, smaller, and stands relatively lower. Its legs are olive green; very +rarely an individual in spring has quite yellow legs.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The fall migration of the solitary sandpiper is a general +southward movement all across the continent, performed in a leisurely +manner. The earliest birds, probably adults, reach New +England in July; and late birds, probably young, linger through +October. Mr. Brewster (1925) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On August 2, 1873, I saw fully 100 along the Androscoggin River between the +lake and Errol Dam, and almost as many more, a few hours later, while going +up the Magalloway River some 7 or 8 miles. At that date in almost any year +there is, throughout the whole Umbagog region, almost no muddy shore of pond, +lake, river, lagoon, or brook, whether open to the sun or densely shaded by +overhanging foliage, which is not frequented by one or more solitary sandpipers. +Hence we may safely assume that in the region at large they are regularly +present in far greater numbers during August than at any other time of year.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>When with us in the fall they are more likely to be seen on open +meadows or salt marshes than they are in the spring, often in company +with lesser yellowlegs. Mr. Nichols writes to me:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In the first half of August, 1919, this species was unusually plentiful, living +on the bay marsh at Mastic, Long Island, with maximum numbers August 9 to +10. The birds frequented the larger bits of flooded dead marsh that yellowlegs +love and were also found in smaller, less open, pools more overshadowed by +grass. On August 16 and 17 two birds were also repeatedly found feeding on +patches of weed matted at the surface of an adjacent creek, exceedingly tame. +The presence of these solitary sandpipers on a coastal marsh may have been +due to conditions of high-water level prevailing at the time, flooding the muddy +borders of inland pools where they are ordinarily to be looked for.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Capt. Savile G. Reid (1884) says that in Bermuda “they generally +come with the other species in August. They soon betake themselves +to the wooded swamps, where they may be found singly or in pairs +throughout the autumn.”</p> + +<p>On the Pacific coast both races of the solitary sandpiper occur regularly +on the fall migration, but the western race is undoubtedly much +commoner and is supposed by some to be the only race found west of +the Rocky Mountains. The migration occurs mainly in August and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</span>early September. J. A. Munro tells me that he gets both forms +regularly at Okanagan Landing, British Columbia.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—A few birds may spend the winter in the West Indies, +but the main winter home of the species is in South America. The +distribution of the two forms in winter is not well understood and +probably both races are more or less mixed. W. H. Hudson (1920) +writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I was once pleased and much amused to discover in a small, sequestered pool +in a wood, well sheltered from sight by trees and aquatic plants, a solitary +sandpiper living in company with a blue bittern. The bittern patiently watched +for small fishes and when not fishing dozed on a low branch overhanging the +water, while its companion ran briskly along the margin snatching up minute +insects from the water. When disturbed they rose together, the bittern with +its harsh, grating scream, the sandpiper daintily piping its fine, bright notes—a +wonderful contrast! Every time I visited the pool afterwards I found these +two hermits, one so sedate in manner the other so lively, living peacefully +together.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North America chiefly east of the Rocky Mountains to +South America.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The only unquestioned eggs of the solitary sandpiper +that have been collected have come from Alberta where it is +known to breed from the northern part south as far as Stony Plain +and Red Lodge. A pair of adult birds with young also were collected +in 1921, 30 miles below Fort Simpson, Mackenzie (Williams, 1922), +while the same observer found them common in the vicinity of Fort +Norman, Mackenzie, as late as August 14.</p> + +<p>It has been reported breeding as far south as Iowa (Keokuk and +Winneshiek Counties); Ohio (Columbus); and Pennsylvania +(Pocono Mountain and Beaver); and east to New Hampshire (Isle +of Shoals, Franconia, and Appledore); Maine (Penobscot and +Aroostook Counties); and Quebec (Lake Mistassinni and Godbout). +The circumstances attendant upon each of these and intermediate +cases are such as to cause doubts concerning their authenticity, +although it seems probable that the species did, (and possibly still +does) breed somewhere in eastern North America.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The solitary sandpipers wintering in South +America have been determined subspecifically only on a few occasions, +so it should be understood that the following outline includes both +<i>solitaria</i> and <i>cinnamomea</i>. Specimens collected in Colombia by Chapman +and Todd all prove to be <i>solitaria</i>, while Chapman obtained +both races in Ecuador.</p> + +<p>The winter range of the species extends north to Vera Cruz +(Playa Vicente); rarely Florida (probably Pensacola, probably +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</span>Waukeenah, Sevenoaks, and Safety Harbor); rarely Georgia (Chatham +County); probably the Bahama Islands (Inagua); Jamaica; +and Porto Rico. East to Porto Rico; eastern Venezuela (mouth of +the Orinoco River); British Guiana (Bartica); Dutch Guiana +(Surinam and Maroni River); French Guiana (Cayenne); Brazil +(Mixiana, Para, Chapada, Urucuia, and Pitanguy); Paraguay (Colonia +Risso); Uruguay (Rocha, Montevideo, and Colonia); and +Argentina (Buenos Aires and Azul). South to Argentina (Azul +and Cordoba). West to Argentina (Cordoba, Tucuman, Salta, and +Oran); Bolivia (Caiza); Peru (Chorillos, Cajabamba, and Tumbez); +Ecuador (Guayaquil and Quito); Colombia (Cali, Novita, +Medellin, Puerto Berrio, and Santa Marta); Costa Rica (San Jose); +Guatemala (Los Amates and Duenas); Yucatan (Tabi); and Vera +Cruz (Playa Vicente).⁠<a id="FNanchor_1_1" href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a></p> + +<div class="footnotes"> +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_1_1" href="#FNanchor_1_1" class="label">[1]</a> The migration dates here given probably include, in many cases, observations and +records for both <i>solitaria</i> and <i>cinnamomea</i>.</p></div> +</div> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival in the spring migration +are: South Carolina, Charleston, March 27, and Aiken, March 30; +North Carolina, Raleigh, April 4, and Weaverville, April 9; District +of Columbia, Washington, March 30; Pennsylvania, State College, +April 14, Sewickley, April 15, and Doylestown, April 16; New Jersey, +Dead River, April 18; New York, York, April 18, Ithaca, +April 20, and New York City, April 21; Connecticut, Litchfield, +April 27, and New Haven, April 29; Massachusetts, Northampton, +April 25, Melrose, April 26, and Fitchburg, April 28; Vermont, +Randolph, April 26, Bennington, May 4, and Wells River, May 6; +New Hampshire, Manchester, April 26, and Monadnock, May 11; +Maine, Orono, May 3, Pittsfield, May 6, and Waterville, May 7; +Quebec, Quebec, May 1, and Godbout, May 4; Mississippi, Bay St. +Louis, March 17, and Biloxi, March 25; Louisiana, Hester, March 16; +Arkansas, Monticello, March 24, and Tillar, March 31; Tennessee, +Nashville, April 7; Kentucky, Bowling Green, April 8, and Russellville, +April 9; Missouri, Jonesburg, March 19, and Monteer, April 6; +Illinois, Rantoul, March 24, Danville, April 2, and Chicago, April 7; +Indiana, Frankfort, March 15, Indianapolis, March 17, and Delhi, +March 28; Ohio, Oberlin, March 28, Sandusky, March 31, and Scio, +April 7; Michigan, Ann Arbor, April 23, Hillsdale, April 24, and +Portage Lake, April 30; Ontario, Toronto, March 16, London, April +28, and Ottawa, May 2; Iowa, Hillsboro, April 10, National, April +14, and Sigourney, April 20; Wisconsin, Beloit, April 24, Milwaukee, +April 25, and Madison, April 26; Minnesota, Minneapolis, April +17, Hallock, April 21, and Lanesboro, April 24; Texas, Santa Maria, +March 3, Brownsville, March 17, Texas City, March 22, and Boerne, +March 25; Kansas, Wichita, March 29, Emporia, April 10, and +Independence, April 16; Nebraska, Neligh, April 20, Red Cloud, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</span>April 25, and Valentine, April 27; South Dakota, Forestburg, April +16, and Huron, May 3; North Dakota, Charlson, April 27, and Bismarck, +April 30; Manitoba, Aweme, April 29; Saskatchewan, Wiseton, +May 13, and Osler, May 19; and Alberta, Alliance, May 2, +Flagstaff, May 4, and Oonoway, May 5.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are Colombia, La Manuelita, April +11, and eastern Santa Marta region, April 18; Costa Rica, San Jose, +April 27; Yucatan, Rio Lagartoo, April 13; West Indies, San +Domingo, April 27; Cuba, Isle of Pines, May 18; Bahama Islands, +Nassau, May 10; Florida, St. Marks, May 10, and Pensacola, May +30; Alabama, Bayou Labatre, May 20, and Autaugaville, May 23; +Georgia, Macon, May 10, and Savannah, May 17; South Carolina, +Aiken, May 10, Frogmore, May 19, and Mount Pleasant, May 27; +North Carolina, Weaverville, May 20, and Raleigh, May 28; District +of Columbia, Washington, May 21; Maryland, Sandy Springs, +May 22, and Cumberland, May 23; New Jersey, Camden, May 25, +Morristown, June 7, and Bernardsville, June 11; New York, Rhinebeck, +May 26, Cincinnatus, May 31, and Orient Point, June 6; Connecticut, +Norwalk, May 27, and Litchfield, May 31; Rhode Island, +Providence, June 3; Massachusetts, Worcester, May 30, Melrose, +June 1, and New Boston, June 10; Louisiana, New Orleans, May +6, and Bains, May 12; Mississippi, Ellisville, May 17; Tennessee, +Nashville, May 27, and Knoxville, June 12; Kentucky, Bowling +Green, May 22; Missouri, St. Louis, May 16, and Monteer, May 20; +Illinois, Chicago, May 26, Joliet, May 28, and Rantoul, May 29; +Indiana, Goshen, May 24, and Holland, May 30; Ohio, Columbus, +June 1, Oberlin, May 28, and Huron, May 29; Michigan, Laurium, +May 26, and Detroit, May 30; Ontario, Port Perry, May 27, Toronto, +June 3, and Madoc, June 7; Iowa, Sioux City, May 26, Emmetsburg, +May 29, and Sioux City, May 30; Wisconsin, Madison, May 27, and +La Crosse, May 29; Minnesota, Waseca, May 22, Hallock, May 25, +and Minneapolis, May 31; Texas, Gainesville, May 15, Kerrville, May +20, and Hidalgo, May 23; Kansas, Lawrence, May 21, and Topeka, +May 22; Nebraska, Valentine, May 20, and Lincoln, May 22; South +Dakota, Huron, May 21, Vermilion, May 27, and Forestburg, May +30; North Dakota, Charlson, May 25; Manitoba, Aweme, May 26, +Shell River, May 29, and Shoal Lake, June 1; and Saskatchewan, +Prince Albert, June 5, and Kutanajan Lake, June 15.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival in the full migration are: +Saskatchewan, Maple Creek, July 6; Manitoba, Margaret, July 8, +and Oak Lake, July 19; South Dakota, Sioux Falls, July 1, and +Forestburg, July 2; Nebraska, Valentine, July 3; Kansas, Little +Blue River, July 22; Texas, Gurley, July 15, Kerrville, July 20, +Brownsville, August 2; Minnesota, St. Vincent, July 2, Lanesboro, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</span>July 4, and Minneapolis, July 15; Wisconsin, Shiocton, June 30, +North Freedom, July 14, and Ladysmith, July 16; Iowa, Marshalltown, +July 8, Sioux City, July 12, and Hillsboro, July 18; Ontario, +Toronto, July 10, and Port Dover, July 13; Michigan, Detroit, July +7, and Charity Island, July 10; Ohio, Columbus, July 3, Wooster, +July 8, and Painesville, July 20; Indiana, Sedan, July 15; Illinois, +Chicago, July 3, Glen Ellyn, July 16, and Port Byron, July 21; +Missouri, Monteer, July 29; Kentucky, Bowling Green, July 22; +Mississippi, Biloxi, July 12, and Bay St. Louis, July 16; Louisiana, +New Orleans, July 9; Massachusetts, Becket, July 8, Harvard, July +12, and Lynn, July 17; Rhode Island, Newport, July 4, and Providence, +July 11; Connecticut, East Hartford, July 14, and Milford, +July 28; New York, Camp Upton, July 8, Rochester, July 12, and +Poland, July 15; Maryland, Calverton, July 14, and Cambridge, +July 19; District of Columbia, Washington, July 15; North Carolina, +Raleigh, July 14; South Carolina, Frogmore, July 24, and Charleston, +July 26; Alabama, Stevenson, July 15, and Leighton, July 17; +Florida, Pensacola, July 12, Bradenton, July 12, St. Marks, July +28, and Key West, July 28; Bahama Islands, Fortune Island, August +5; Cuba, Isle of Pines, August 20; Porto Rico, Comerio, July 29; +and lesser Antilles, St. Croix, August 5.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Keewatin, Echimamish River, +September 15; Manitoba, Shoal Lake, September 17, and Aweme, +October 5; North Dakota, Charlson, September 18; South Dakota, +Forestburg, September 30; Nebraska, Valentine, October 9, Nebraska +City, October 10, and Lincoln, October 20; Minnesota, St. Vincent, +September 22, Parkers Prairies, September 30, and Lanesboro, +October 4; Wisconsin, Elkhorn, October 10, Delavan, October 20, +and Racine, October 30; Iowa, Marshalltown, October 5, and Hillsboro, +October 20; Ontario, Toronto, October 2, St. Thomas, October +4, and Ottawa, October 31; Michigan, Detroit, October 1; Ohio, +Weymouth, October 14, Austinburg, October 28, and Medina, November +1; Indiana, Indianapolis, October 15, Richmond, October 28, +and Roanoke, November 15; Illinois, Chicago, October 6, La Grange, +October 7, and De Kalb, October 10; Missouri, Jaspar City, October +9, and Independence, October 13; Kentucky, Bowling Green, October +11, Versailles, October 21, and Lexington, October 23; Tennessee, +Knoxville, October 11, and Nashville, November 4; Quebec, Montreal, +September 27; Maine, Portland, October 6, Pittsfield, October +8, and Hebron, October 20; New Hampshire, Tilton, September 29, +Lancaster, October 5, and Errol, October 31; Vermont, Rutland, +October 10, and West Barnet, October 17; Massachusetts, Lynn, +October 28, and Boston, October 30; Rhode Island, Providence, +October 13; New York, Rochester, October 10, Ithaca, October 19, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</span>and New York City, October 31; New Jersey, Montclair, October +13, Elizabeth, October 16, and Morristown, November 1; District +of Columbia, Washington, October 28; Maryland, Chesapeake Beach, +November 2; and South Carolina, Long Island, November 8.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The typical form of the solitary sandpiper has +been many times taken in Western States. Among these occurrences +are: New Mexico (Guadalupito, August 7, 1903); Wyoming (Arvada, +August 19, 1913); Montana (Milk River, July 25, 1874, Miles +City, August 14, 1900, Gold Creek, August 20, 1910, and Three +Buttes, August 6, 1874). Many specimens also have been taken in +British Columbia (Atlin and Okanagan Landing), where it appears +to be of regular occurrence, a specimen was taken at Griffin Point, +Alaska, June 1, 1914, and one at Fort Chimo, Ungava.</p> + +<p>Two were collected on October 12, 1897, on Chatham Island, +Galapagos Archipelago; one was taken on the Clyde River, Lanarkshire, +Scotland; and another was obtained at Kangek, Greenland, +on August 1, 1878.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Alberta: 29 records, May 24 to June 24; 15 records, +May 30 to June 8.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Western"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">TRINGA SOLITARIA CINNAMOMEA</span> <span class="smaller">(Brewster)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">WESTERN SOLITARY SANDPIPER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The western race of this species is larger than the eastern. In adult +nuptial plumage the upper parts are much less distinctly spotted with +whitish, the white bars on the tail are decidedly narrower and the +outer primary is usually finely mottled, with ashy white along the +border of its inner web; this last is none too constant a character and +is sometimes seen in the eastern bird. The name was derived from +the fact that in young birds the light spots on the back, scapulars +and wing coverts are brownish cinnamon instead of white or buffy +whitish.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—The following description of the song flight of this +species was originally recorded by Dr. Joseph Grinnell (1900) under +the name of the undivided species, but he now evidently thinks that it +should belong here:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The song flight of this species is mostly indulged in during the early morning +hours. This consists of a slow circuitous flight on rapidly beating wings high +over the tree tops, accompanied by the frequent repetition of a weak song somewhat +resembling the call of a sparrow hawk. At the close of this song flight the +bird alights, as if exhausted, and perches silently for some time at the top of the +tallest spruce in the vicinity. During the performance of the male, the female +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</span>may be seen feeding around some grassy pool beneath, from all appearances +entirely unmindful of the ecstatic efforts of her mate.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Nothing definite is known of the breeding range or nesting +habits of the western solitary sandpiper. It is supposed to breed +in the interior of British Columbia and Alaska. The following observations, +made near Circle, Alaska, by Dr. Wilfred H. Osgood +(1909) throw some light on the subject:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Within a radius of several miles from Circle one or more adults were found +about almost every woodland swamp. In most cases they acted like parent +birds anxious for the safety of their young. Whenever we entered certain precincts, +they hovered nervously about, calling loudly, or alighted on nearby +trees scolding. The first pair seen near Charlie Creek exhibited such actions +on the evening of June 22, and we made a hasty search in the twilight for +young birds, but found nothing. The excitement of the old birds seemed to +be greatest while we were in a small grassy swamp, so the next day we made +a more careful search. The old birds were even more excited than before, and +it was some time before we detected that, besides the loud cries ringing all +about us, a faint peeping was issuing from several points in the grass. Guided +by this scarcely audible peeping, we soon found three downy young birds widely +separated and squatting aimlessly in the grass. They are quite small, exactly +of a size, and none shows the least indication of growing feathers; evidently +they belonged to one clutch, and could not have been out of the eggs more than +one or two days. The eggs of this species, like those of the European green +sandpiper, have been found in the nests of other birds in trees. The small opening +where the birds were found was bounded on one side by an extensive area +grown with willows of relatively small size, but on the other side was only +a thin line of willows and then alders, birch, poplars, and heavy spruce, in which +probably such birds as olive-backed thrushes, robins, and varied thrushes nested +in abundance. Therefore there was ample opportunity for the sandpipers to +lay their eggs in the nests of these birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The downy young referred to above are thus described +by Robert Ridgway, (1919):</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>General color of upper parts cinnamon drab, longitudinally varied with +brownish black; forehead and crown with a broad median streak of black; a +sharply defined black loral streak, extending from bill to eye; a narrow black +stripe across auricular region (longitudinally), or a black postauricular spot; +occiput brown centrally, black exteriorly, the black border sending from each +side a forward branch; an oval patch of brownish black on median portion of +rump, this bordered along each side by a stripe of pale dull vinaceous-buff, the +two buffy stripes converging or almost uniting both anteriorly and posteriorly; +wings cinnamon drab, margined posteriorly with dull white, the brown portion +with several irregular spots or blotches of black; under parts dull white.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Subsequent plumages and molts are doubtless similar to those of +the eastern race.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—As mentioned under the preceding subspecies, we know +very little about the winter distribution of the two races. Dr. Frank +M. Chapman (1926) says that most of his specimens from Ecuador +are of this form, which he calls “a common winter resident from the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</span>coast to the tableland, arriving from the north at least as early as +August 10.” Dr. Alexander Wetmore (1926) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The specimens taken at Formosa and General Roca belong certainly to the +western form, on the basis of size (male, wing, 134.3; female, wing 136.7 mm.), +dorsal coloration, and the presence of mottling on the inner web of the outer +primary. A female from Lazcano, Uruguay, has molted the outer primaries, +but on the basis of other measurements and on the presence of some dark, buff +mottling on the back seems within the limit of variation of <i>cinnamomea</i> and +is identified as the same as the other two. Though the typical subspecies +<i>solitaria</i> is recorded definitely from Colombia by Chapman, these findings seem +to cast a doubt on its presence as far south as Argentina.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Western North America and South America.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—No unquestioned set of eggs of the western solitary +sandpiper has thus far been recorded. Downy young with their +parents have, however, been taken in western Alberta (Henry House) +and in Alaska (Circle, Kowak River, Eagle, and Charlie Creek). +There also is a strong probability of their breeding in British Columbia +(Cariboo District, and Ducks).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—As mentioned under <i>T. s. solitaria</i>, the two races +of this species on their wintering grounds in South America have +been distinguished only on a few occasions. It is probable that they +either occupy the same winter grounds or that their ranges overlap. +All specimens collected by Wetmore (1926) from Uruguay, Paraguay, +and Argentina, prove to be this form, indicating that it may winter +south of true <i>solitaria</i>. It also has been taken by Chapman in +Ecuador (Guayaquil, Loja, and Cebollal).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: Texas, Samuels, +April 15, and Henrietta, April 19; New Mexico, State College, +May 4, and Las Vegas, May 8; Colorado, Colorado Springs, May 1, +Denver, May 4, and Boulder, May 5; Montana, Terry, May 7, and +Billings, May 10; Alberta, Athabaska Landing, May 5, Edmonton, +May 10, and Sandy Creek, May 14; Mackenzie, Fort Simpson, May +10, and Fort Providence, May 14; Arizona, Verde Valley, April 20, +and Paradise, May 9; California, Los Angeles, April 10, Gridley, +April 23, and Fort Crook, May 4; Oregon, Anthony, April 16, and +Malheur Lake, April 17; Washington, Tacoma, May 6; British Columbia, +Okanagan Landing, May 5, and Chilliwack, May 7; Yukon, +Forty-mile, May 8; and Alaska, Tocatna Forks, May 12, Nulato, +May 15, and Kowak River, May 18.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Colorado, Boulder, May 25, +Denver, May 28, and Grand Junction, June 3; and Wyoming, Fort +Saders, May 25.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</span></p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of fall arrival are: California, Santa +Barbara, July 22; Arizona, Apache, July 29, Cave Spring, August 1, +and White Mountains, August 10; Montana, Terry, June 28; Wyoming, +New Castle, July 7; Colorado, Lytle, July 6, Middle Park, July +13, and El Paso County, July 23; New Mexico, Zuni Mountains, July +24; and Texas, Brownsville, July 31.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Alaska, Taku River, September +15; British Columbia, Okanagan Landing, September 26; Washington, +Seattle, September 11; California, Santa Barbara, September 7; +Arizona, San Pedro River, October 10; Lower California, Agua +Escondido, November 18; Montana, Missoula, September 4, Terry, +September 5, and Bitterroot Valley, September 7; Wyoming, Yellowstone +Park, September 4, and Green River, September 5; Colorado, +Boulder, September 18, Florissant, October 5, and Greeley, October +25; and New Mexico, Acoma, September 27, and Glenrio, October 2.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Green"> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">TRINGA OCROPHUS</span> <span class="smaller">Linnaeus</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">GREEN SANDPIPER</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed, by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The green sandpiper is only an accidental visitor to North America. +Swainson and Richardson (1831) record it from Hudson Bay, but +this is now generally acknowledged to be probably due to error. +However, Dr. T. M. Brewer (1878) mentions a specimen obtained at +Halifax, Nova Scotia, in 1872 or 1873 and forming part of a collection +made there which was purchased by J. E. Harting from a dealer +at Woolwich. The evidence is far from satisfactory and Seebohm’s +remarks (1884) should be consulted, but the skins in question are +still in existence in the collection of the British Museum.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—It is a most remarkable fact that though the green +sandpiper is widely distributed during the breeding season over temperate +Europe and is by no means a shy or retiring bird, even though +it haunts the recesses of wooded marshes and wet forests, yet there is +hardly anything on record about its courtship activities. Seebohm +writes that the notes “are no doubt modulated into a musical trill as +the male performs his amatory excursions in the air during the pairing +season,” but adds that he has never had the good fortune either +to hear the love song or to find it described. Fortunately Prof. +C. J. Patten (1906) met with a pair which frequented a moorland +stream in the neighborhood of Sheffield from May 3 to June 4, 1903. +He says:</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They were always to be found in the same spot, and after feeding they frequently +flitted on to a stone wall, where for a little while they would remain +motionless. At intervals they suddenly shot up into the air for a short distance, +darting down again to the same stone with astonishing speed. On the wing they +displayed great activity and adroitness, the female twisting and turning to +escape the addresses of the male.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Newton (1896) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Yet in the breeding season, even in England, the cock bird has been seen to +rise high in air and perform a variety of evolutions on the wing, all the while +piping what without any violence of language may be called a song.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Doctor Hartert (1920), speaking of its habits on its breeding +grounds, remarks that it may be seen shooting through the air with +the speed of an arrow, and opines that this must be the love flight. +With the exception of these notes and some references to the song +(which are referred to under the heading of Voice), I can find +nothing in the literature with regard to the actual courtship, except +Hartert’s statement that on the ground the male trips about, with tail +outspread like a fan, calling loudly. When, however, a pair has +definitely settled down in its breeding territory, both birds are exceedingly +noisy and demonstrative. Wheelwright (1864) speaks of +the “boisterous, noisy behavior” of this bird, and in his later work +on Sweden (1865) remarks:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Now, of all our waders, this is the noisiest, and there is little trouble in finding +the locality where it breeds, for the old male is always about some brook in the +neighborhood, and I have before noticed that the loud, wild cry of the green +sandpiper and greenshank are much alike.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The nesting habits of the green sandpiper have been +fully described, but were practically unknown to naturalists till about +1852–1860, when quite independently Forester, Weise, and Hintz +(sen.), in Germany, and H. W. Wheelwright in Sweden, published +the results of their discoveries. The story is told in detail by Forest-Inspector +Weise, in the <i>Journal für Ornithologie</i> for 1855 (p. 514). +He had first heard of the habit of adopting old nests of other species +in trees from an old ranger, but naturally discredited it. However, +in 1845, the same man brought him four sandpipers’ eggs from a nest +in an old beech. Next spring Weise found a green sandpiper breeding +in a pine about 25 or 30 feet from the ground. He climbed to +the nest and found the four eggs so highly incubated that the young +could be heard squeaking inside the shells. Two other nests in +similar sites came to his notice subsequently, the last on May 25, +1855, when the four eggs were already chipped.</p> + +<p>Forester, W. Hintz 1, writing in the same periodical for 1862 (p. +460) says that he had found sandpipers’ nests in trees as far back as +1818, but at that time he had no correspondents who took any +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</span>interest in birds’ eggs and only took a clutch or two for his own +collection. On April 26, 1834, he found a clutch of this species in +a nest of the song thrush (<i>Turdus philomelus</i>) and from 1852 onward, +as the circumstances began to be known to German naturalists, +he found a long series of nests with eggs of which he gives full +details. Most of these eggs were laid in old nests of song thrush +(<i>Turdus philomelus</i>), but some were placed in old nests of pigeon +(probably <i>Columba palumbus</i>) or squirrel’s dreys, and in one case +the young were found in an old nest of red-backed shrike (<i>Lanius +collurio</i>). Another curious case recorded is that in which an old +aspen (<i>Populus tremula</i>) was broken off and a hole which had been +occupied in the previous year by a pied flycatcher, contained a +brood of young green sandpipers, which had apparently only been +hatched half an hour before. On the forester’s approach the young +birds jumped from the hole and concealed themselves among the grass. +Some further details are also given in a letter from Hintz sent to +the Rev. H. S. Hawkins and published in Dresser’s Birds of Europe; +also in the <i>Journal für Ornithologie</i> for 1864 (p. 186).</p> + +<p>Summarizing these we find that the birds arrive on their nesting +grounds in Germany from the beginning to the middle of April, +choosing wooded localities in marshy districts with pools or slow-flowing +streams in the neighborhood. Old nests of song thrush, +blackbird, mistle thrush, red-backed shrike, and half-ruined nests +of jay, woodpigeon, or squirrel are all adopted from time to time. +Occasionally the eggs are laid in a hollow where dead leaves and +pine needles have accumulated, and holes formerly used by starlings +and flycatchers have been taken possession of. The height from the +ground varies considerably, some nests may be as much as 35 or 40 +feet above the ground while others are only a few feet up. The +distance from the nearest water is also variable, as though most +nests are within 500 yards, yet occasionally the birds have been +known to nest half a mile away.</p> + +<p>Meantime H. W. Wheelwright in Sweden had met with an exactly +similar state of things, and in the <i>Field</i> newspaper of August 18, +1860, described the tree-nesting habits of this species. The editor, +who was ignorant of the evidence of Weise and Hintz, openly expressed +his doubts as to the accuracy of the observations, but Wheelwright +stuck manfully to his facts and subsequently the editor admitted +his mistake. The republication of Wheelwright’s notes in +Sweden in 1866 elicited further evidence from Jagmaster Lundborg, +who had on one occasion taken the eggs from what appeared to be +an old squirrel’s drey or nest. The only important difference in the +habits of the bird in the two countries appears to be that nests of +the hooded crow (<i>Corvus c. cornix</i>) are freely used in Sweden and +also those of the fieldfare (<i>Turdus pilaris</i>).</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</span></p> + +<p>Like the greenshank, the green sandpiper has a great attachment +to certain localities and in some cases the identical nest has been used +for two consecutive seasons. In a district where the birds are not +scarce, this naturally renders the discovery of the nest much more +simple to the resident, and explains the success of Forester Hintz +and others in discovering the eggs. Very little in the way of addition +appears to be made by the sandpipers to their adopted home +and the pine needles which are noted in the interior of old thrushes’ +nests may well have dropped from the adjacent trees in the ordinary +way.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—These are normally four in number, pyriform in shape, +rather thin shelled and, as compared with those of the wood sandpiper, +generally large and pale in coloring, showing more of the +ground colors and fewer markings. The ground color varies from +some shade of pale greenish or greenish grey to warm creamy, +buffish stone color and light yellowish red. The markings are +generally rather fine and in the reddish eggs are rich purplish brown, +shading into very dark brown, while in the greenish eggs they are +generally less reddish and more purplish in tone. Numerous fine +speckles are characteristic and there are generally also some underlying +shell marks of violet or ashy. The measurements of 100 eggs +average 39.11 by 28.04 millimeters; the eggs showing the four +extremes measure <b>42</b> by 28, <b>41.1</b> by <b>30.3</b>, <b>34.6</b> by 26, and 34.8 by <b>25.7</b> +millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—As to the shares of the sexes in incubation, there are +references to females shot from the nest and males on guard in +the neighborhood, but how far this has been confirmed by dissection +and how much is surmise it is not easy to say. The incubation +period is also unknown. When the young are hatched their stay +in the nest is very short. Besides Hintz’s observation, quoted above, +of recently hatched young jumping from the nest into the grass on +his approach. Wheelwright also found on one occasion four very +small young, apparently not a day old, at the foot of a fir, while +in the nest overhead were the empty shells, still wet inside. In +this case the early abandonment of the nest was not due to human +interference. On another occasion Hintz found three young and a +chipped egg in a squirrel’s drey about 30 feet up in a birch. The +young birds sprang from the nest and alighted on the ground without +injuring themselves, concealing themselves at once among the +grass.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The molts and plumages are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds, edited by H. F. Witherby +(1920), to which the reader is referred.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The main food of this species consists of insects, especially +small coleoptera and their larvae, but larval forms of other +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</span>water insects such as the Phryganeidae are also taken and also +larvae of Diptera. Other substances recorded include wood lice, +spiders, and not infrequently the very small red worms, which are +to be met with on the edges of stagnant pools, but apparently not +common earthworms. Traces of vegetable matter are also recorded. +H. Stevenson also includes small fresh-water mollusca, and W. Farren, +algae, tender shoots of plants and on the seashore thin shelled +Crustacea.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The green sandpiper may be met with in the British +Islands in almost every month of the year except perhaps June, +when it is decidedly rare, though only a few individuals stay with +us through the winter. As some birds have undoubtedly stayed +through the summer, breeding has been suspected on several occasions, +but the evidence has always been unsatisfactory. It occurs +most frequently in spring and autumn, sometimes singly and sometimes +(especially in autumn), in family parties, haunting the margins +of brooks and ponds.</p> + +<p>They are much more deliberate in their movements than the +common sandpiper and search the mud very thoroughly, boring into +it with the bill, probably in search of the small red worms on which +they feed. Without being especially shy, they have their wits about +them and frequently the piping note which they utter when well on +the wing (not just prior to rising) is the first indication of their +presence to the shooter. The striking contrast of color between +the dark greenish mantle and the snow white rump and tail coverts +render its recognition a fairly simple matter. From the wood sandpiper +it can be readily distinguished if a glimpse can be caught of +the undersurface of the wing, for in the green sandpiper the axillars +are very dark, looking almost black, whereas in the wood sandpiper +they appear almost white with faint barrings.</p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—With regard to the notes, during the breeding season the +alarm is given by a loud sharp call which is variously written as <i>gik</i>, +<i>giff</i>, <i>yick</i>, <i>yeck</i>, etc., somewhat recalling the nuthatches’ call. Christoleit +also describes a pairing song, which bears some resemblance to +that of the other sandpipers, but does not make it clear whether it is +uttered on the wing or on the ground. In forested country it is +naturally not so easy to settle a point of this kind as in open country. +The full song is written by him as: <i>Tittittitluidich-luidich titluidie +titluidie titluidie-titt-titt</i>. Probably this is the love song and forms +part of the courtship, but we still await a connected history of the +courtship of this species.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—Hintz noticed the last birds on their German breeding +grounds up to July 25, and it is about the middle of July when the +first immigrants appear in the British Isles. The great majority of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</span>our visitors have left by November. During the period of its stay +it is rarely to be met with on the seashore, but nearly always makes +its way inland by means of the water courses, preferring a sheltered +brookside or an inland pool to the open marshes.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—The evidence of wintering in South Africa rests entirely +on some old records by Layard, unsupported by skins, but the winter +quarters undoubtedly extend to Angola, British Central Africa, and +Portuguese East Africa. Unlike so many waders it does not associate +in large flocks, but generally is found singly or in small parties on +inland waters in preference to the coast. Large numbers winter in +Egypt and a good many at suitable spots in the Mediterranean +Region. In Luzon (Philippine Islands) Whitehead found it common +in December in Benguet, at a height of 4,000 feet, and on Rumenzon +it has been met with at 6,000 feet, while in Abyssinia, Jesse describes +it as common on the highlands, but did not meet with it on the coast.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—Northern Europe; but very sparingly in Norway +up to Nordland; in Sweden more generally north to the Arctic +Circle; Finland to 63° 10´; North Russia south of the White Sea and +on the Kamin Peninsula (66° 50´). Southward it breeds in the +Baltic Republics, in North Germany (Holstein?, Oldenburg?, Hanover, +Mark Brandenburg, Pommern, West and East Prussia, Silesia); +sparingly in Bavaria; Czechoslovakia (Bohemia), Galizia and the +Carpathians; possibly occasionally in Jutland, but records from +South France and North Italy can not be relied on. In Asia it +breeds across the continent in the valleys of the Ob, Yenisei, Lena, +etc., south to Turkestan and Transcaspia.</p> + +<p><i>Winter Range.</i>—The main winter quarters lie in southern Europe +and Africa where it ranges south to Portuguese East Africa, British +Central Africa, and Angola, perhaps even to the Cape (Layard) and +in Asia to Iraq, India, Ceylon, the Andamans, Burma, Cochin China, +China, Hainan, Formosa, and the Malay Archipelago (Philippines).</p> + +<p><i>Spring Migration.</i>—In February and March it passes north +through Morocco from its African winter quarters, and in Tunisia +is most abundant on spring passage in March and April, while its +stay in equatorial Africa does not extend beyond March. In the +marshes of Iraq it stays till mid May, the spring in North Asia being +later than in West Europe. This is also the case in India, where +they do not leave till about mid May. In southeast China they +pass in the first half of April, usually singly. It has been noted +on passage in Corsica in April (late date May 28); some winter on +the Balearic Isles where it has been noted up to the end of May, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</span>while in Cyprus it is found on passage in March, April, and May +(birds seen in Greece on 25th July and in South China on 11th and +24th July were either nonbreeders or extraordinarily early migrants +southward). The first arrivals reach their breeding grounds in +Germany about the end of March, and in the Baltic states they arrive +about the end of March or early April.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Leaving their breeding grounds in Central +Europe about the end of July, they pass the Straits of Gibraltar +about August–September and in Greece arrive in some numbers in +September. In the Iraq marshes the arrival takes place during +August, while in India it sometimes comes during the latter half of +July, but more frequently in August. In southeastern China the first +arrivals come in about the end of July or early in August, but the +main body passes in September or October. In Burma it is generally +distributed during the winter months, but apparently does not range +down the Malay Peninsula.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—It is a winter visitor to Japan and occurs occasionally +on the Canaries, but the record from Mauritius must be regarded +as doubtful, and that from Australia by R. Hall is due to confusion +with <i>T. glareola</i>. Gould’s record from Borneo is also doubtful and +the American records can only be received with some suspicion.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—In Germany out of some 25 records only five fall between +April 15 and 24. From May 2 to 15 there are nine records, +from May 18 to 29 five records, and from June 1 to 23, six records. +Probably most of these late dates are due to birds laying again +which have been previously robbed. In Sweden all dates fall between +May 6 and June 20 (13 records) and of these eight fall between May +6 and May 21. The second half of May is the usual time in the +southern Provinces, but in the north and Finland few eggs are laid +before June. In Siberia eggs may be found till the first half of +July.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Wood"> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">RHYACOPHILUS GLAREOLA</span> <span class="smaller">(Linnaeus)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">WOOD SANDPIPER</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The only record of this species within North American limits is due +to Chase Littlejohn (1904), who obtained a single specimen on May +27, 1894, on Sanak Island, Alaska.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—Our information on this point is somewhat scanty. +The song flight has of course been frequently described and observed, +but the actual courtship of the female can only be observed under +somewhat difficult conditions and there must be a considerable element +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</span>of luck in any case where it can be closely studied. All the +evidence hitherto obtained goes to show that it is carried on in much +the same way as that of the common sandpiper (<i>Tringa hypoleucos</i>), +but the song flight forms a much more conspicuous part of the proceedings. +When the male alights he has a habit of elevating his +wings for a moment, until, as Seebohm says, they almost meet overhead, +much as Temminck’s stint also does. Apparently this forms +part of the display before the hen, but the male may also be seen +running by the side of the female with drooping wings. One can as +a rule only get a momentary glimpse and generally at a considerable +distance. The love song is, however, quite another matter. On the +heaths of West Jutland one can see the males in rapid flight even +from the windows of the trains, while in North Finland the loud +musical <i>leero</i>,<i>leero</i>, <i>leero</i>, is one of the most familiar sounds in the +wood-fringed marshes. John Hancock (1874), who by persevering +search found the only nest which has ever been discovered in the +British Isles, in June 1853, gives a very graphic account of it. He +was on a visit to Prestwick Car, in Northumberland, at that time +undrained, and as he says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>About 3 o’clock our dogs, a retriever and a setter, raised a bird about 50 +yards in advance of us, which at once rose to a considerable height coursing +about, rising and sinking somewhat in the manner of a snipe, and like it, while +sweeping downwards with outstretched, tremulous wings, produced a peculiar +drumming note, but one much shriller than that of the snipe, and almost +amounting to a sort of musical whistle. From the strangeness of the actions +and peculiar whistling or drumming note, I was convinced that we had met +with a rare bird, and that its nest was near at hand. The birds were still in +view flying about; our only chance now was to watch the bird to its nest. It +was not long before one of the birds “pitched” and after allowing a little +time for it to settle I went forth to raise it, but did not succeed. The bird, +however, was soon in the air again flying about as before. The watching dodge +was again tried and this time the bird was marked to, and raised from the +nest. There lay the nest, with its four pretty eggs, on the side of a dry +hillock where grew some heath and grass in the midst of a swampy spot.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>One of the parents was subsequently shot by Mr. Reay to authenticate +the identification, and the specimen is still extant. Seebohm +(1884) also describes the song flight, but it is difficult to reconcile +his account with the facts. According to him:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The note which the male utters during the pairing season is much more of +a song than that of the grasshopper warbler, which it somewhat resembles; +it is a monotonous <i>tit-it-it</i>, begun somewhat low and slow, as the bird is descending +in the air with fluttering upraised wings, becoming louder and more +rapid and reaching its climax as the bird alights on the ground or on a rail, +or sometimes on the bare branch of a willow, the points of its trembling wings +almost meeting over its head when its feet find support. This song is a by +no means unmusical trill, and has an almost metallic ring about it.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</span></p> + +<p>The comparison to the trill of the grasshopper warbler seems very +far fetched, and would apply far better to the persistent trilling of +Temminck’s stint. In fact the note reads like a paragraph drafted +from filed notes jotted down when the writer was surrounded by +singing stints and sandpipers; the metallic and musical song and +dashing flight being that of the wood sandpiper and the monotonous +trill being that of Temminck’s stint. To my ear the Finnish name +of the bird, “liro,” exactly describes the ringing musical cadence +which one hears overhead so frequently by the lake sides and marshes +of Sweden and Finland. Buturlin notes the song as <i>peri</i>, <i>peri</i>, <i>logi</i>, +<i>logi</i>, <i>logi</i>, and von Droste’s translation is also expressive <i>hithitit-tli-a</i>, +<i>tli-a</i>, <i>tli-a</i>, <i>tlia</i>. It is obvious that this bears no likeness whatever +to the monotonous droning note, rising and falling slightly as +the bird turns its head, of <i>Locustella naevia</i>. Occasionally the song +of the wood sandpiper is uttered while the bird is perched on a +bush or in treeless districts even on the ground.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Although often not concealed with any art, the nest of +the wood sandpiper is by no means an easy one to find, as the possible +area is so vast, while the sitting bird frequently remains on the eggs +until almost trodden on. In consequence most nests are discovered +by accident, when the bird has been flushed at one’s feet, or by long +and systematic beating of likely ground in the neighborhood of a +singing male. The nest is, however, almost invariably on some slight +eminence, a hummock in some cases as much as 2 feet high, though +often smaller, and on dry ground, though there may be water within +a foot or so. The actual nest is merely a hollow in the ground, lined +with bents and grasses and is usually to be found on low-lying +ground where willow scrub, heath mosses, and rank grasses furnish +a certain amount of cover. This is the normal European site, but +H. Leyborne Popham (1897), while collecting on the Yenisei in 1895, +found that out of five nests discovered in that season, only one was +placed on the ground, while the eggs in the other four cases were +laid in the numerous old nests of fieldfares (<i>Turdus pilaris</i>) and +other thrushes which were to be seen in great numbers in the trees. +In 1900 Mr. Popham (1901) was able to confirm these observations, +for in the forest district two more clutches were taken from old +thrushes’ nests, while at the edge of the tundra two nests were found +on the ground. That this habit is not strictly confined to the forest +districts of Asia was proved by Lieut. S. A. Davies (1895), who +visited the upper waters of the River Muonio on the borders of +Finland and Sweden in 1904. He obtained a clutch from an old +nest of great grey shrike (<i>Lanius excubitor excubitor</i>), placed in the +fork of a birch about 20 feet from the ground. A. Cnattingius also +found the eggs on one occasion in Sweden in a fieldfare’s nest, 8 feet +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</span>from the ground. There is some evidence that in certain parts of the +range this species breeds almost in colonies. Collett has described a +case of this kind from the high field of southern Norway, and +Forester Hintz (sen.) writes that on one marshy flat of about 60 +acres in Mecklenberg from 7 to 9 pairs were breeding, and that on +May 25, 1858, he received no fewer than 26 fresh and partly incubated +eggs from this locality.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—These are normally four in number, pyriform in shape +and thin shelled. The ground color varies from a beautiful pale +green to creamy white and exceptionally to warm buff. They are +spotted and blotched, more heavily at the large end, with warm +reddish brown, some eggs have most of the markings small, but +others have large and almost confluent blotches. There are also a +few purplish brown shell marks. The measurements of 100 eggs +average 38.34 by 26.4 millimeters; the eggs showing the four +extremes measure <b>42</b> by 28.1, 41.5 by <b>28.5</b>, <b>35.5</b> by 25 and 37 by <b>24.4</b> +millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Both sexes take part in incubation; all the birds shot +by Popham from the nest in 1895 were males, but in 1900 he found +that out of two killed one was a male and the other a female. +Collett also notes that both sexes have incubation patches. When +the young are hatched the parents display the greatest anxiety, +but the male bird seems to take the greater share in brooding and +guarding them. On one occasion H. J. Pearson (1904) surprised +a bird with four young only about a day old in a marsh. He placed +the young in his pocket after having spent half an hour in finding +them, though they were fully exposed to view and all within 10 yards. +The young soon began to cry out and the parent bird, which he +surmised to be the male, followed him nearly a mile, often settling +within 5 feet and expressing his views. He then flew back to the +marsh, but actually returned and settled on a low shed near the +house. Lieut. S. A. Davies (1895) having caught a brood of young, +placed them on the ground in a marsh, first in one place and then +in another, in order to watch them.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The male bird would run excitedly in and out of the tussocks, searching +everywhere till he heard their feeble chirp. Then he would run toward them +and settle down a yard or two off, quickening his note to a continuous <i>giff-giff-giff</i>. +Then all the young had to tumble along laboriously (for they could +hardly walk) till they reached the male bird who tucked them safely under +his wings; once or twice the female bird appeared on the scene for a minute +or two, when both would soar in the air like drumming snipe.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The molts and plumages are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds, edited by H. F. Witherby +(1920), to which the reader is referred.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</span></p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The greater part of the food consists of insects and their +larvae, but worms are also taken in some numbers and small mollusca, +as well as spiders. Among insects the following classes may be +mentioned: Beetles (Coleoptera), including many water beetles, +<i>Haliplus</i>, <i>Hydroporus</i>, <i>Dytiscus</i>, <i>Berosus</i>, <i>Dryops</i>, <i>Helichus</i>, <i>Phylobius</i> +(all recorded by Hesse), and <i>Gyrinus</i>, <i>Hydroporus</i>, <i>Donacia</i>, +and <i>Colymbetes</i> (R. Gray). Of Diptera, Hesse records larva of +<i>Stratiomys</i> (also recorded by Bar), and among Rhyncota, <i>Plea +minutissima</i> (once by Hesse). Rey also met with Arachnida (spiders), +and Jäckel records small fish.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Many observers have called attention to the habit of +perching on trees. Seebohm (1884) mentions having shot specimens +from the summit of high bare trees at least 65 feet from the ground, +and similar observations have been made wherever it has been met +with in forested regions. Beside the love song already described, +this bird has an alarm note, which Davies renders as <i>tchick-tchick</i>, +or <i>giff-giff</i>, and which is generally uttered from the top of a bush +or post. A. Chapman phrases this note as <i>chirkop</i>, <i>chirkop</i>, <i>chib</i>, +<i>chib</i>.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—From July to October it appears often singly, but also at +times in flocks in Great Britain. As a rule these flocks are of no +great size, but on July 26, 1867, Mr. Power met with large numbers +at Rainham, Kent, and when one had been shot others rose on all +sides, forming one large flock, which flew round and round, keeping +up a continual whistle. He estimated the number at 80–100.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—During the winter months it haunts mud banks at the +mouths of rivers or marshes and streams inland in small flocks, or +sometimes in pairs, feeding on worms and small insects in southern +Africa. Its habit of perching on trees and bushes has also been +noted when wintering in northern Africa (Tunisia). On the whole, +it may be described as a fresh-water haunting species, usually avoiding +the neighborhood of the sea.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—Not on the Faeroes, as stated by Ridgway, but +formerly in very small numbers in Great Britain, Holland, Jutland, +Scandinavia, north Germany locally. Finland, the Baltic Republics, +and Russia generally; also in Asia, east across Siberia to Kamtschatka +and the Commander Isles, north to about 75° on the Yenisei and 71° +on the Lena. Reports of breeding in south Europe (Spain, north +Italy, Pyrenees, etc.) require confirmation.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—Africa, south to Cape Province; Asia, southern +Arabia, Iraq (chiefly on passage), India and Ceylon, Burma, the +Malay Peninsula, and southeast China; the Malay Archipelago +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</span>(Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Celebes, Timor, Philippines, etc.); and +Australia.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—It leaves its winter quarters in South Africa +in March, is common in the swamps of Morocco toward the end of +April, fairly plentiful in Tunisia in April and also in numbers in +Egypt, some remaining till May. Most have left Iraq by mid May, +and the departure from India, Ceylon, and Burma also takes place in +May. They pass Gibraltar from March 9 to early May; Corsica, +April 12 to May 28; Cyprus, April–May (late date May 20); Corfu, +April 19–May 6; while a few visit the south and east coast of Great +Britain in April and May. On the lower Petchora they did not +arrive till May 26.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—From Portugal it is recorded on August 18, Spain +(early date, August 4), passes through Italy in some numbers from +August to October, leaving Sweden in September and passing the +eastern Pyrenees in September-October. It reaches Iraq in August, +but rarely stays after October; arrives in India and Burma in +August; and in South Africa in September-October, early dates, +August, Transvaal (August 28) and Zambesi River.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—Faeroes (H. C. Muller), Madeira (R. Gomez), +Canaries (occasional D. A. Bannerman), Hawaiian Isles, and Sanak +Island, Alaska (C. Littlejohn).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—In Holland, May 11 to 25 (9 dates); Jutland and Germany, +May 7–25 (about 18 dates, mostly after May 20); south +Sweden from mid May onward; Lapland, June 3–16 (16 dates), June +17–27 (11 dates), July 7 (one date).</p> + +<div class="chapter" id="Eastern"> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">CATOPTROPHORUS SEMIPALMATUS SEMIPALMATUS</span> <span class="smaller">(Gmelin)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">EASTERN WILLET</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>A score of years or so ago it seemed as if this large showy wader +was destined to disappear from at least the northern portion of its +range on the Atlantic coast. It had entirely ceased to breed in many +of its former haunts and was nearly extirpated in others. Most of +the birds that we shot on migration in New England were immature +birds from the West. In Wilson’s (1832) time it bred “in great +numbers—along the shores of New York, New Jersey, Delaware, and +Maryland.” Audubon (1840) wrote that “a few have been known +to breed not far from New Bedford in Massachusetts,” probably on +some of the islands off the coast. In 1875 H. B. Bailey (1876) +found it breeding “in large numbers” on Cobb Island, Va.; when +we visited this locality in June, 1907, there were not over two or +three pairs of willets breeding there; they have increased since then +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</span>under protection. Maj. G. Ralph Meyer wrote to me in 1922 that +about 15 pairs bred on Cobb Island and 5 or 6 pairs on Hog Island +that year. It does not now breed in any numbers, so far as I know, +north of South Carolina, except in the Nova Scotia colonies.</p> + +<p>Although our check list does not recognize that fact, it has been +known for many years that willets breed regularly in southern Nova +Scotia, though during the early years of this century they came very +near being extirpated. Dr. Spencer Trotter (1904) recorded the +willet as “one of the most conspicuous inhabitants of the tidal +marshes” near Barrington, Shelburne County. But when I visited +that locality with him in July, 1907, we found only one pair. Evidently +they began to increase again after that under adequate protection. +Harrison F. Lewis (1920) found them breeding in Yarmouth +County, and Dr. Charles W. Townsend (1920<i>a</i>) saw a flock +of 10 on July 18 and as many as 26 on July 25, 1920, near Barrington. +Later information from R. W. Tufts (1922 and 1925) shows a decided +increase up to 1922, when he estimated that there were 736 willets, +old and young, between Digby and Queens Counties; but in 1923 and +1924 there seemed to be no further increase.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The northward migration of willets, which breed north +of the winter range, is along the Atlantic coast, starting in March. +The first migrants reach Virginia during the first or second week in +April, but do not appear in Massachusetts until May, the main flight +passing between the middle and last of that month. The probability +of an offshore migration route is suggested by the following interesting +observation made by Dr. George B. Grinnell (1916) during the +last days of May, 1907:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>It was in the middle of the morning of a gray, but not foggy, day, when we +were off the Grand Banks of Newfoundland, that I noticed a considerable +gathering of birds resting on the water in the immediate path of the ship. As +we approached them I thought they looked like shore birds, and as the vessel +drew quite close to them those immediately near it rose on wing and flew off to +right and left, and again alighted on the water among their fellows. In the +way in which they left the path of the vessel they reminded me of similar +flights of waterfowl seen in Alaska. When the birds took wing they were at +once recognized as willets, and there must have been somewhere near a thousand +of them, not all packed together in a dense clump on the water, but more or less +scattered out, in groups of forty, fifty, or a hundred, yet all fairly near one +another, and suggesting a single flock. They seemed to leave the water reluctantly +and gave me the impression that they were weary.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—Very little seems to have been recorded about the +courtship of the willet, but John T. Nichols has sent me the following +notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On the shore of Wakulla County, Fla., in late March willets were evidently +about to nest, March 27 they were noticed chasing one another in air, and holding +the wings over the back after alighting, the black and white pattern displayed. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</span>The following mating behavior was observed March 29 toward sunset. Out on +a mud flat exposed by low water two birds were standing. One stood directly +behind the other, waving its parti-colored wings over its back, and ended by +mounting the back of the front bird and fluttering there. The performance was +accompanied by a tern-like series of <i>kuk-kuk-kuk-kuk-kuk</i> calls.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The eastern willet is decidedly a coastwise bird and it is +seldom seen far from the coastal marshes, beaches, and islands. Its +favorite nesting places are on sandy islands overgrown with grass, tall +and thick enough to conceal its nest, or on dry uplands where similar +conditions may be found in close proximity to marshes or the shore. +In Nova Scotia I was too late to find nests, but Mr. Lewis (1920) +writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I have occasionally searched for the nests or the young of the willets, but +without success until June 8, 1920, when I found a nest with four eggs of this +species, in an open swale in an upland pasture, about a quarter of a mile from +the nearest salt marsh or salt water, at Arcadia, Yarmouth County, Nova Scotia, +on the western side of the Chetogue River. The nest was near the junction of +the River Road with Argyle Street, and was about 150 yards from each of those +much-traveled highways, which were in full view from the nest site. Several +cattle occupied the pasture at the time when the nest was found. The swale in +which the nest was placed was of considerable extent and was of the kind +preferred as a breeding place by Wilson’s snipe; in fact, a pair of those birds +were evidently nesting there. The willet’s nest was a slight hollow in the damp +ground, lined with a few dead rushes. It was surrounded by growing rushes, +cinnamon fern, low blackberry bushes, and wild rose bushes, and was well +concealed.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Tufts (1925) says that “they often nest in the open pastures +or on the rough boulder-strewn uplands at a considerable distance +inland,” but all the nests that he found were “on low land close to the +feeding grounds,” near the shore. One nest was located under a +tangle of wild rose bushes in a pasture in Yarmouth County.</p> + +<p>More typical nesting conditions are to be found on the coastal +islands of Virginia and South Carolina. In the Bull’s Bay region +of South Carolina we visited two islands, on May 22 and 23, 1915, on +which willets were breeding. Most of the nests were on a sand-hill +plain, back of the beach, which was overgrown with tufts of fine +beach grass and with a few scattering clumps of myrtle bushes. The +nests consisted of deep hollows in the sand in or under the tufts of +grass, usually well concealed, and were well lined with bits of dry +grass, sedges, or small sticks; the hollows measured 6 or 7 inches in +diameter. A partially built nest contained only one egg, which was +lying on the bare sand and was only partially surrounded by the +nesting material; apparently material is added during the laying +period and the nest is not completed until incubation begins. One +nest was under a little dead, thorny bush, but well concealed, on a +small, high spot on an open sandy reef, not far from the nests of +oyster catchers and Wilson plover. Another nest, in a situation +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</span>which was probably flooded at times, was built up 10 inches above +the damp ground in a clump of thickly tufted sedges. H. B. Bailey +(1876) says that, on Cobb Island, “the marshes are also favorite +localities for breeding, and in this case the nests are more elaborate, +being built up from the ground, which is wet at high tide.” I think, +however, that the willet prefers to nest on dry ground.</p> + +<p>Roger Tony Peterson writes to me that, among 11 nests found by +him on the South Carolina coast, “five sets of eggs on one particular +strip of beach were located on the open sand with no preparation at +all made for a nest.” Another set was “in a very heavy, well-made +nest of weeds and grass, out on the open sand, far from any grass +or bushes.” All were very conspicuous.</p> + +<p>C. J. Maynard (1896) found them breeding in Florida, during the +first week in May, “among the low scrub, just back of the beach +ridge. The nests were placed in the midst of low bushes and were +quite difficult to find.” Arthur T. Wayne (1910) “found two nests +on the top of a high sand hill, in wild oats (<i>Zizania miliacea</i>)” and +E. A. Samuels (1883) says that it “has been known to breed in a +rye field 20 miles from the seashore.”</p> + +<p>Willets which I have found breeding on the coasts of Louisiana +and Texas have proved to be referable to the eastern form. On +Dressing Point Island in Matagorda Bay, Tex., we found a few pairs +breeding, with heavily incubated eggs, on May 8, 1923. This is a +large, flat, grassy island on which we found black-crowned night +herons and a few pairs of Ward herons nesting on the ground. The +willets’ nests were well concealed under thick tufts of luxuriant grass.</p> + +<p>Willets on their breeding grounds are among the noisiest and most +demonstrative of birds. No sooner does one land on an island where +they are breeding than an outcry is started and one after another +the birds arise and fly out to meet the intruder, until the whole colony +is in a state of great excitement. Regardless of their own safety they +circle about at short range, pouring out a steady stream of angry +invectives in a great variety of loud, ringing notes. And this performance +is kept up as long as the intruder is anywhere near their +nests. They often alight on bushes, trees, posts, or even buildings +and keep up a constant scolding.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The willet regularly lays four eggs; as many as six, and +even seven, have been found in a nest, but these large numbers are +probably the product of two females. The eggs vary in shape from +ovate to ovate pyriform and they have only a slight gloss. The +ground colors vary from “deep olive buff” to “olive buff,” rarely +“yellowish glaucous,” in greenish types, and from “avellaneous” to +“tilleul bluff,” rarely pale “Isabella color,” in the buffy or brownish +types; and there are numerous intermediate shades between these +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</span>extremes. They are generally boldly and irregularly marked with +both large and small spots and blotches, but sometimes they are +quite evenly covered with small spots; rarely they are blotched +around the large end only. The markings are mostly in dark browns, +“burnt umber,” “bister,” “sepia” and “clove brown,” but sometimes +they are in lighter, olive browns. The underlying markings are in +various shades of “brownish drab” or “drab gray.” The measurements +of 56 eggs average 52.5 by 38 millimeters; the eggs showing +the four extremes measure <b>60.5</b> by 38, 53.5 by <b>40</b>, <b>49</b> by 37, and 50 by +<b>36</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—The period of incubation seems to be unknown. Both +sexes share in the care of the young, which run soon after hatching. +Arthur T. Wayne (1910) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The young are hatched by May 29, and the parents sometimes remove them +between the thighs (as the woodcock is also known to do) to a place of safety, +fully a quarter of a mile away. I observed this trait on May 29, 1899. I found +a nest in an oat field, which contained one young bird just hatched and three +eggs on the point of hatching. I remained near the place until the eggs were +hatched, and the willets were greatly alarmed all the time. Presently I saw +one of the old birds remove a young one and fly with it across three creeks +and marsh land to an island a quarter of a mile away. This was repeated until +all the young were removed.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The downy young willet is rather prettily and quite +distinctively marked. There is a distinct loral stripe of brownish +black, a post ocular stripe and a median frontal stripe of “warm +sepia.” The chin and throat are white and the rest of the head is +pale buff, mixed with grayish white, heavily mottled on the crown +with “warm sepia.” The down of the hind neck and upper back is +basally sepia with light buff tips. The rest of the upper parts are +variegated with pale buff, grayish white and “warm sepia”; but in +the center of the back is a well marked pattern of four broad stripes +of “warm sepia” and three of light buff, converging on the rump +and between the wings. The under parts are buffy white.</p> + +<p>The young bird begins to acquire its Juvenal plumage before it +is half grown, beginning with the scapulars, back and wings; then +comes the plumage of the breast and crown, and lastly the neck, +rump and tail. In the full juvenal plumage, in July, the feathers +of the crown, back, scapulars and wing coverts are “sepia”; those +of the crown are tipped, those of the back and scapulars are broadly +edged or notched and those of the wing coverts are still more +broadly edged with “pale pinkish buff”; the greater coverts are +irregularly barred, variegated or sprinkled with sepia; the rest of +the wing is as in the adult; the rump is “hair brown,” narrowly +tipped with buffy white; the upper tail coverts are white, indistinctly +barred with dusky near the tips; the central tail feathers are barred +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</span>with “sepia” and “drab,” tinged with “pinkish buff,” these markings +decreasing laterally; the chin, upper throat and belly are white; +the lower throat, chest, and flanks are suffused with “pale pinkish +buff,” streaked on the throat and chest and barred on the flanks with +“sepia.” These colors soon fade until the edgings become nearly +white.</p> + +<p>A partial molt takes place mainly in September, involving the +body plumage, the tail and some of the wing coverts; this produces +the first winter plumage, which can be distinguished from the adult +only by the retained juvenal wing coverts. This plumage is worn +through the winter and I think, in most cases, through the first +spring. At the next complete molt, the first postnuptial, the adult +winter plumage is acquired.</p> + +<p>Adults have a nearly complete prenuptial molt in March, April, +and May, involving everything but the flight feathers of the wings, +which are apparently molted later in the fall or early in the winter. +I have not actually seen these feathers molting. The lighter portions +of the spring plumage wear away during the breeding season, +giving the birds a very black appearance above. The complete postnuptial +molt begins with the body plumage in August, or even +July, and by September the plain “smoke gray” winter plumage +is assumed.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The favorite feeding grounds of the eastern willet are +on the broad mud flats or sand flats in the bayous, bays, and estuaries +on the coast; it also feeds along the muddy banks of creeks +and ditches, or about the pond holes and splashes on the salt marshes. +If disturbed at its feeding it rises with a loud outcry, alarming all +the birds within hearing. W. J. Erichsen (1921) has noted that, although +they feed at all hours of the day, the nesting birds are seldom +found on their nests during the early morning hours, when there +seems to be a concerted movement from the breeding grounds to +their feeding places. I am inclined to think, however, that they are +governed more by the tides than by the hours, as most of their feeding +grounds are covered at high tide.</p> + +<p>Their food consists of aquatic insects, marine worms, small crabs, +fiddlers, small mollusks, fish fry, and small fish. Some vegetable +matter is eaten, such as grasses, tender roots, seeds, and even cultivated +rice.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The flight of the willet is said to be swift, but it has +always seemed to me to be rather slow and heavy, when compared +with the flight of other shore birds, though perhaps it results in +better speed than it appears to do. The willet is a heavy-bodied +bird and its flight is strong, direct, and protracted; it seems to fly +more like a duck than the other shore birds. Occasionally it sets +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</span>its wings and scales downward; and on its breeding grounds I have +seen it hover on quivering wings like a poised falcon. I have +not found the willet particularly shy, as compared with other large +waders, though it has the reputation of being very wary. When in +large flocks in open situations, it is useless to attempt to approach +it; but I have often walked up to within gunshot range of single +birds and have frequently had small flocks fly within range while +I was standing in plain sight. On its breeding grounds it is utterly +fearless and bold.</p> + +<p>Willets often perch on bushes, trees, fences, posts, rocks, or buildings, +where they can watch and scold at the intruder. Mr. Maynard +(1896) has seen them “perching on the limbs of pine trees, 40 or 50 +feet from the ground, and sometimes, a dozen birds would sit side +by side on a single branch, presenting a novel appearance.” Being +partially webfooted, they can swim fairly well and probably alight +on the water to rest when migrating at sea. On the ground they are +rather sluggish, standing still much of the time, with heads drawn +down. They indulge in the bobbing or nodding motions less frequently +and more moderately than the yellowlegs do. Francis H. +Allen has noted that “in bobbing, the head is drawn back and the +tail lowered at the same time, the whole body turning as on a pivot, +then the head is brought forward and the tail raised to its natural +level.”</p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—On its breeding grounds the willet is a very noisy bird, +pouring out a great variety of notes. Its usual note is a loud, vehement +<i>wek</i>, <i>wek</i>, <i>wek</i> or <i>kerwek</i>, <i>kerwek</i>, <i>kerwek</i>, varied to <i>piuk</i>, +<i>piuk</i>, <i>piuk</i>. Occasionally the whistling note, <i>pill</i>, <i>will</i>, <i>will</i> or <i>pill-o-will-o-willet</i>, +is heard, suggesting the note of the yellowlegs in quality, +accent, and manner of delivery. Less frequently another note +is heard, which sounds like <i>beat it</i>, <i>beat it</i>. John T. Nichols adds in +his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At this season one hears several variations of the <i>kiyuk</i> flight note, one of +these, <i>ki-yi-yuk</i> suggesting the loudest, most ringing call of the greater yellowlegs. +A loud, high-pitched <i>kree-uk</i>, which is infrequent, suggests a note of the +lesser yellowlegs. Similarly <i>kuk-kuk-kuk-kuk-kuk</i> in tern-like series from +two mating birds is probably homologous with the alighting and flushing +notes of the yellowlegs. The ordinary loud flight note of the transient willet +is a far-reaching, gull-like <i>kiyuk</i>, repeated at intervals. A less frequent call +resembles the <i>wheu wheu wheu</i> of the greater yellowlegs, but is much lower +pitched, not loud. It is likely to be heard from a bird lingering at a given +locality.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—Man has been the chief enemy of the willet and the +main cause of the restriction of its breeding areas. When it bred +abundantly in Nova Scotia and Virginia its eggs were collected in +large numbers as a legitimate article of food. And the birds were +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</span>shot all through the breeding season. Being a large, fat bird, it +helped to fill the game bag rapidly and so was a favorite with sportsmen +or market gunners. It does not come readily to decoys, but it +can easily be attracted by a skillful imitation of its notes, and flocks +often fly by within range of the gunner’s blind. Mr. Nichols tells +me that it will decoy well to the whistled imitation of the black-bellied +plover’s note. As it is no longer on the game-bird list, it will +probably be given a chance to increase.</p> + +<p>Some colonies have been washed out by high tides and their +natural enemies, predatory animals and birds, have done considerable +damage. P. B. Philipp (1910), who visited Raccoon Key, S. C., +says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The birds had been badly persecuted by fish crows and minks; broken and +sucked eggs were found everywhere, and two nests were found in which the +skeleton of the bird was lying on sucked eggs, the work of minks.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The willet, while standing on the ground, is a +nondescript looking bird, almost devoid of characteristic markings, +especially in the immature and winter plumages. It is about the +size of the greater yellowlegs, but more heavily built, with shorter +and heavier, bluish-gray legs, shorter neck, and decidedly heavier +bill. Its drab colors match well into a background of sand or mud. +But when it lifts its black and white wings or when flying, no bird +is more easily recognized, for its color pattern is unique and conspicuous; +the black wings, with their broad white band extending +across the base of the tail, advertise the willet as far as they can be +seen. Its notes, described above, are also quite characteristic.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—I imagine that the willets, which breed in Nova Scotia, migrate +at sea to the West Indies, mainly in August. I have never seen +an adult willet on the New England coast in the fall, and practically +all that I have shot are referable to the western form, but it is not +easy to recognize the two forms in immature plumage. Willets of +some form, in immature plumage, are quite common at times in +southern New England and on Long Island from the middle of July +to the middle of September. The main flight comes in August. I +suspect that these are practically all young western willets.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—The eastern willet spends the winter on the south Atlantic +and Gulf coasts of North America, in the Bahamas and West Indies, +and on the more northern coasts of South America. It is therefore +resident or present the year round in much of its breeding range. It +is rather rare as far north as South Carolina, but abundant in Florida +and on the Gulf coasts, where the resident birds are reinforced by +eastern and western willets from the North. In Florida they are occasionally +seen about the ponds on the prairies or in the pine woods, +but their favorite resorts are the broad mud flats in the estuaries and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</span>bayous or in the coastal marshes. In such places we often saw them +in large flocks by themselves, where they were very shy and utterly +unapproachable. Toward the end of March their numbers began to +decrease, as the birds left for their breeding grounds.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—The Atlantic and Gulf coasts of North America to northern +South America; accidental in Kansas, Bermuda, and Europe.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The breeding range of the willet extends north +to Texas (Corpus Christi, Houston, and Galveston); Louisiana (Calcasieu, +New Orleans, and Breton Island); Alabama (Grand Batture +Island and Bayou Labatre); and Nova Scotia (Digby, Halifax, and +Sable Island). East to Nova Scotia (Sable Island and Barrington); +Massachusetts (formerly New Bedford and Nantucket); Connecticut +(Madison and West Haven); New Jersey (Barnegat Inlet, +Bridgeton, Beasleys Point, Sea Isle City, and Cape May); Maryland +(Berlin); Virginia (Chincoteague, Hog Island, Cobb Island, +and Norfolk); North Carolina (Atlantic and Beaufort); South Carolina +(Waverly Mills, Sullivans Island, and Frogmore); Georgia +(Savannah, Darien, and St. Simons Island); eastern Florida (Fernandina, +Anastasia Island, New Smyrna, Turtle Mount, Mosquito +Lagoon, Cape Canaveral, and Lake Worth); and the Bahama Islands +(Great Bahama, Abaco, and Inagua). South to the Bahama Islands +(Inagua and Andros); the West Indies (Grand Cayman); western +Florida (Indian Key and St. Marks); and Texas (Brownsville). +West to Texas (Brownsville and Corpus Christi).</p> + +<p>The breeding range above outlined has become greatly restricted, +and while it is still reported as breeding in Nova Scotia, it is of rare +occurrence at this season on the coasts of the Northern and Middle +Atlantic States. Willets have been reported as nesting on Barbuda, +West Indies, but the record is probably based upon non-breeding +individuals which also have been noted in Cuba (Guantanamo).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range extends north to Texas (Brownsville); +Louisiana (State Game Preserve and Breton Island); Alabama +(Coffee Island); and probably rarely Virginia (Cobb Island). +East to rarely Virginia (Cobb Island); rarely North Carolina (Fort +Macon); South Carolina (Waverly Mills and Frogmore); Georgia +(Savannah and Darien); Florida (Fernandina, Mosquito Inlet, Indian +River, Sebastian, and Royal Palm Hammock); the Bahama +Islands (Grassy Creek and Caicos); Cuba; probably Haiti; Porto +Rico (Boqueron and Anegada Island); the Lesser Antilles (Antigua, +Barbados, Grenada, and Trinidad); British Guiana; and Brazil +(Catejuba Island). South to Brazil (Catejuba Island and Guapore +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</span>River). West to Brazil (Guapore River); northeastern Colombia +(Cartagena); probably Panama (Rio Juan Diaz); Yucatan (Merida +and Cozumel Island); Tamaulipas (Matamoros); and Texas +(Brownsville).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: New Jersey, +Cape May, March 22, Long Beach, April 6, and Caldwell, April 7; +Rhode Island, Rock Island, April 27; Massachusetts, Nantucket, May +2, Dennis, May 5, and Falmouth, May 11; and Nova Scotia, Yarmouth, +April 22, and Wolfville, April 29.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Mexico, Tampico, April 11; and +Cuba, Trinidad, April 14, Siguanea, May 2, and Guantanamo, May 8.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Information is lacking of the early arrival of the +willet on the southern part of its winter range, but among late dates +of fall departure are: Maine, Sagadahoc County, October 25; Massachusetts, +Plymouth, October 4; Connecticut, Meriden, October 15; +New Jersey, Salem County, October 8, and Caldwell, October 17; and +Maryland, near Baltimore, about November 1.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The willet has been taken once in Kansas (near +Hamilton, September 8, 1912); and one was obtained in Bermuda +on July 3, 1848. It also has been reported on a few occasions from +Europe, in all cases without complete data: France (Abbeville, also +two in the Paris market); Dalmatia; and Sweden.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Nova Scotia: 4 records, June 5 to 19. Virginia: 26 +records, May 19 to June 16; 13 records, May 27 to June 8. South +Carolina and Georgia: 53 records, March 10 to July 4; 27 records, +May 9 to 22. Texas: 28 records, April 3 to June 10; 14 records, +April 23 to May 24.</p> + +<div class="chapter" id="W_willet"> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">CATOPTROPHORUS SEMIPALMATUS INORNATUS</span> <span class="smaller">(Brewster)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">WESTERN WILLET</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>When William Brewster (1887) described and named the western +willet he characterized it as:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Differing from <i>S. semipalmata</i> in being larger, with a longer, slenderer bill; +the dark markings above fewer, finer, and fainter, on a much paler (grayish-drab +ground); those beneath duller, more confused or broken, and bordered +by pinkish salmon, which often spreads over or suffuses the entire underparts, +excepting the abdomen. Middle tail feathers either quite immaculate or very +faintly barred.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>It is a bird of the western interior; its main breeding grounds are +in the Great Plains regions of the Northern States, west of the Mississippi +River, and the central Provinces of Canada. Nearly all +recent writers have recorded it as breeding on the coasts of Louisiana +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</span>and Texas, an oft-repeated error. All the breeding birds that I +have shot on the coasts of these two States, in May and June, were +clearly referable to the eastern form. And I have been unable to +find any specimens of <i>inornata</i> in collections that could be classed +as breeding birds from these States. If the western willet breeds +in Texas at all it must be on the plains or prairies of the interior. +But it seems hardly likely that it would have a breeding range so +widely separated from the northern range as outlined below. The +eastern willet is strictly a coastwise bird and breeds, or did formerly, +all along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts. On the other hand, the western +willet is just as strictly a bird of the inland prairies and plains +during the breeding season.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The main migration route seems to be northward +through the Mississippi Valley, chiefly in April; most of the birds +are on their breeding grounds by the first of May or earlier and +are laying eggs before the end of that month. Birds which winter +in South Carolina and Florida probably join this route by an overland +flight. There is a northward migration through the interior +valleys of California to breeding grounds west of the Rocky Mountains, +and probably some birds cross these mountains to the interior +plains.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—We found western willets very common about the lakes +in the prairie regions of North Dakota and Saskatchewan; but +owing to their habit of flying a long distance to meet the intruder +and making a great fuss everywhere but near their nests, we succeeded +in finding only one nest. This was on the higher portion of +the open prairie, a long way from any water, near Big Stick Lake, +Saskatchewan. The nest was a hollow in the ground, measuring +7 by 6 inches in diameter and 3 inches deep, lined with grasses and +dry weeds. It was in plain sight in short grass; a few scattered +dead weeds were standing around it, but no long grass. It contained +three fresh eggs on June 14, 1906. Ernest T. Seton (Thompson, +1890) found a nest in Manitoba “which was placed in a slight +hollow, shaded on one side by the skull of a buffalo and on the +other by a tuft of grass,” on an alkali plain.</p> + +<p>The western willet breeds commonly in Boxelder County, Utah. +Three sets of eggs in my collection, taken there on May 7, 13, and 16, +1916, by the Treganzas, came from nests described as slight depressions +in short marsh grass; one was near an alkali flat, one near a +water runway, and one on a partially grass-grown dike.</p> + +<p>This bird is a rare, or very local, breeder in California. J. Van +Denburgh (1919) reports five nests found on “a partially flooded +mountain meadow” in Lassen County on June 1 and 6, 1918. “The +nests were made of pieces of weeds rather carelessly built up on the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</span>mud. Some were found where the water was a few inches deep and +some where the mud was drying.”</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The eggs of the western willet are indistinguishable from +those of the eastern bird. There is a slight average difference in +length, but the measurements widely overlap. The measurements of +56 eggs average 54.1 by 37.6 millimeters; the eggs showing the four +extremes measure <b>58.1</b> by 39.4, <b>50.5</b> by <b>39.7</b>, and 54.9 by <b>35</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The sequence of plumages and molts is the same for +both races, but juvenal western birds are somewhat paler than eastern +birds, and they have less barring on the tail feathers or none +at all.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—From its breeding grounds in the interior the western willet +migrates in three main directions to the seacoasts, almost due east to +the Atlantic coast of New York and New England, southeast and +south to the south Atlantic and Gulf coasts and southwest to the +California coast. Probably the birds which breed east of the Rocky +Mountains take the easterly and southerly routes and those which +breed west of these mountains migrate to California. Most of the +willets which we get in Massachusetts in August are immature western +willets; I have never seen an adult. These young birds apparently +come from the Great Lakes region, where they have been +recorded in Illinois and Ohio and as far north as Toronto, Ontario. +John T. Nichols says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Along the bays and marshes of the south shore of Long Island the willet is +a regular late-summer migrant in small numbers varying from year to year. +Southbound shore birds of other species are now following this coast to the +westward, but a large majority of the willet are moving in the opposite direction; +that is, from west to east. Its maximum flight seems to come in the +beginning of August, and a peak of abundance for the species was reached in +1923. At Mastic on August 4, 1923, 14 willet were counted passing west to +east in 3 flocks during 2½ hours’ observation.</p> + +<p>I have examined a number of specimens of these Long Island fall-migration +willet, which have all been in the grey unmarked plumage of birds of the year +(which I would not undertake to distinguish from adult fresh winter plumage), +and remarkably uniform in size. Their bills varied scarcely at all in dimensions +(slightly over 2¼ inches), being decidedly too long for the short-billed +Virginia breeding bird, but much too short for the long-billed bird from the +Dakotas (unless its young of the year are uniformly short-billed).</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—Western willets mingle in winter with their eastern relatives +on the South Atlantic and Gulf coast from Florida to Texas; +they are especially abundant in Texas. They also winter abundantly +from the coast of California southward. Bradford Torrey (1913) +saw them, mixed with marbled godwits, near San Diego, in such +numbers that he—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>mistook them at first for a border of some kind of herbiage. Thousands there +must have been; and when they rose at my approach they made something like +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</span>a cloud; gray birds and brown birds so contrasted in color as to be discriminated +beyond risk of error, even when too far away for the staring white wing +patches of the willets to be longer discernible.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mrs. Florence M. Bailey (1916) has well described their habits, +as beach birds at this season, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In the flocks of brown godwits the few gray willets looked small. They fed in +the same way as the godwits, though their bills were shorter and they could +not probe so deep, but they ran their bills ahead of them through the wet +sand, probed as far as they could reach, and then trotted back before the +oncoming waves. A thoughtless one sat down just at the edge of the water +line one day, its back toning in with the sand, its long legs stretched out before +it; but soon after it was comfortably settled up came the foam and it had to +bend forward on its tarsus, raise itself, and flee up the beach. I often saw one +resting, standing on one leg, or sitting at ease with white rump showing. +When stretching the black of the wings showed effectively as it does both when +the birds fly up and when they alight with wings raised over the back. <i>Willet</i>, +<i>willet</i>, they often called as they went.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—United States and southern Canada (casually Alaska), +south to northern South America.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—North to Oregon (Fort Klamath and Camp +Harney); Montana (Bozeman); Alberta (probably Edmonton and +Buffalo Lake); Saskatchewan (probably Quill Lake and Indian +Head); Manitoba (Moose Mountain and Turtle Mountains); North +Dakota (Cando and Larimore); Minnesota (Herman and Madison); +and probably formerly Illinois (Belvidere and Glen Ellyn). East +to probably formerly Illinois (Glen Ellyn). South to probably +formerly Illinois (Glen Ellyn); Iowa (probably Newton and formerly +Boone); Nebraska (Long Pine, Kennedy, Garden County, and +Morrill County); Wyoming (probably Big Piney); Utah (Parleys +Park and Salt Lake); and northern California (Beckwith). West +to northern California (Beckwith, Grasshopper Valley, Alturas, +and Goose Lake); and Oregon (probably Tule Lake and Fort +Klamath). Non-breeding birds have been observed in summer as far +south as Lower California (Mazatlan and San Quintin Bay); Colorado +(Barr); Florida (Pensacola); and Alabama (Petit Bois Island).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—North to California (Humboldt Bay); Texas +(Brownsville, Corpus Christi, Rockport, and Refugio County); probably +Louisiana; and Florida (Amelia Island). East to Florida +(Amelia Island, Dummitts, and the Florida Keys); Tamaulipas +(Tampico); probably Honduras (San Pedro); Ecuador (Bay of +Santa Elena); and Peru (Tumbez). South to Peru (Tumbez); and +the Galapagos Islands (Albemarle). West to the Galapagos Islands +(Albemarle and Abingdon); Costa Rica (Lepanto); Guerrero (Acapulco); +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</span>Nyarit (San Bias); Lower California (San Quintin); and +California (San Diego, La Jolla, Morro Bay, San Francisco, Bodega +Bay, and Humboldt Bay).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival are: Arkansas, Osceola, +March 29; Missouri, Stotesbury, April 8, and St. Louis, April 27; +Illinois, Quincy, April 5, and Big Lake, April 29; Iowa, Cedar +Rapids, April 2, Emmetsburg, April 21, and Keokuk, April 30; +Wisconsin, Heron Lake, April 10, and Waseca, April 10; Minnesota, +Lanesboro, April 26; Kansas, Manhattan, April 28, and McPherson, +April 30; Nebraska, Niobrara, April 26, Neligh, May 1, and Valentine, +May 5; South Dakota, Pitrodie, April 25, and Forestburg, April 28; +North Dakota, Charlson, May 1, Jamestown, May 1, and Harrisburg, +May 2; Manitoba, Treesbank, April 30; Saskatchewan, Indian Head, +April 26, Wiseton, May 2, and Eastend, May 7; Colorado, Durango, +April 15, Barr, April 20, and Baca County, April 28; Utah, Great +Salt Lake, April 12; Wyoming, Cokeville, April 26, and Cheyenne, +April 30; Montana, Lewiston, May 2, and Billings, May 4; Oregon, +Narrows, April 15; and Alberta, Flagstaff, April 26, Vagreville, +April 28, and Alliance, April 29.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Florida, Indian Rocks, May 6; +Alabama, Coden, May 17; Tamaulipas, Tampico, April 11; Texas, +Brownsville, April 23, and Texas City, May 13; Lower California, +Tres Marias Islands, April 8, and Cerros Island, April 18; and +Nyarit, San Blas, April 24, and Los Penas Island, May 5.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival in the fall are: Lower +California, San Quintin, August 8; Arizona, San Bernardino Ranch, +August 13; New Mexico, Carlsbad, August 16, and Capitan Mountains, +August 28; Oklahoma, Yarnaby, August 9; Texas, Padre Island, +August 20; and Tehuantepec, San Mateo, August 6. Western +willets also are of fairly regular occurrence in fall migration on the +Atlantic coast, specimens having been collected in Massachusetts, +Newburyport, August 5, and Boston, August 8; Connecticut, Stony +Creek, August 15, and West Haven, August 26; Rhode Island, +Quonochontaug, August 5; and New York, Amityville, August 14, +and Hempstead Bay, August 15.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Oregon, Yaquina Bay, October +1; Montana, Terry, September 8; Idaho, Rupert, October 20; Nevada, +Carson River, October 13; Arizona, San Bernardino Ranch, September +2; Wyoming, Yellowstone Park, September 13; New Mexico, +Jicarilla Apache Reservation, September 13; Saskatchewan, Redberry, +September 2; North Dakota, Dawson, September 17, and +Harrisburg, October 3; Nebraska, Long Pine, September 10, and +Lincoln, September 29; Iowa, Cerro Gordo County, September 2, and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</span>Keokuk, October 27; Illinois, Chicago, September 30; and Connecticut, +West Haven, September 3, and once in October.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—In spite of its regular occurrence on the Atlantic +coast, the western willet has been detected only on a few occasions in +the interior States east of the Mississippi River. There appear to +be several records for Ohio from April 30 (Oberlin) to November 2 +(Bay Point); one for Indiana, Millers, August 14, 1897; and one for +Michigan, Ann Arbor, May, 1889. One was taken July 20, 1898 at +Toronto, Ontario, and four other specimens without data are presumed +to be from the same locality (Fleming). Other casual occurrences +are: Washington, Seattle, July 23, 1922, and Tacoma, September +6, 1913; British Columbia, Clover Point, August 18, 1898; +probably Yukon, Lake Marsh, July 2, 1899; and Alaska, Lynn Canal +(Hartlaub).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Utah: 32 records, April 5 to May 21; 16 records, May +4 to 14. Saskatchewan and North Dakota: 19 records, May 8 to +June 22; 10 records, May 23 to June 7. Washington to California: +9 records, May 8 to June 16.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Wander"> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HETEROSCELUS INCANUS</span> <span class="smaller">(Gmelin)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">WANDERING TATTLER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>Along the rocky and stony portions of the Pacific coast, and +especially on the islands and outlying reefs, this ocean wanderer +is a common and well-known bird. Here it is much at home among +the surf-swept rocks, drenched in ocean spray and often enveloped in +fog; it has no fear of foaming breakers, which it nimbly dodges +as it seeks its bits of marine food among the kelp and barnacles +on the rocks. It is, at most seasons, essentially a bird of the seashore, +but is seldom seen on the sandy or muddy shores. The dark +color of its upper plumage matches its surroundings and it is not +easily seen among the gloomy rocks, unless its characteristic outline +can be seen against the sky or water as it poses on the top of some +prominent rock to watch the intruder. If he approach too near, +it flies off a short distance with loud, piercing cries and alights +on another rock, to bob and teeter, somewhat like our familiar +spotted and solitary sandpipers. It is generally solitary and seems +to be satisfied with its own society.</p> + +<p>It is well named, as it is a famous wanderer. I am tempted to +quote Dr. E. W. Nelson’s (1887) well-chosen words on this subject, +as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Over the entire coast of the Pacific north of the equator its presence has +been noted by the various naturalists whose Bohemian tastes have made their +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</span>lives somewhat akin to that of this gentle wanderer. Across the broad ocean +it ranges to those bits of paradise dotting the South Seas, tripping its way +daintily on the beaches of the coral-enclosed islands, their feet laved by the +warm waters of the tropics, and their eyes familiar with the luxuriant face of +nature in its gentlest and most lovely state. The next season may find them +thousands of miles to the north, under the shadow of the stupendous cliffs +and grand but desolate and repellent scenes of the Aleutian Islands.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—Prof. Wells W. Cooke (1912) says that “the spring migration +begins in March, bringing the birds to the coast of California +by the latter part of the month. The Aleutian Islands are reached +the middle of May, and the most northern part of the range by the +latter part of the month.” H. W. Henshaw (1902) says that “about +April or May the greater number” leave the Hawaiian Islands for +the north. “While most go, many remain, the latter being the immature +birds and the weaklings. At all events, those that remain +retain the immature or winter dress and show not the slightest inclination +to breed.” Henry Seebohm (1890) reports a straggler +taken on the Bonin Islands on May 11, 1889. D. E. Brown’s notes +record one at Forrester Island, Alaska, on May 3, 1917, and several +at Grays Harbor, Wash., from May 4 to 21, 1920. He says: “At +low tide these birds were found, with flocks of black turnstone, on the +rock jetty and at high tide among the drift logs on the upper beach.”</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The nesting habits of the wandering tattler long remained +shrouded in mystery. Various observers had seen it on or +near its probable breeding grounds in the interior of different parts +of Alaska. Dr. Wilfred H. Osgood (1907) collected a very young +bird in which “the head and neck were still downy,” near the upper +MacMillan River, Yukon, on September 5, 1904, and he reported a +pair, which evidently had young, seen by Charles Sheldon, near +Mount McKinley, July 28, 1906. Dr. Joseph Grinnell (1910) mentions +a “half-grown juvenal” taken by Joseph Dixon on Montague +Island, July 28, 1908.</p> + +<p>The first nest was found in 1912 and is thus described in a letter +from J. M. Jessup to Dr. Charles W. Richmond, accompanied by a +specimen of the bird:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The wandering tattler was found nesting on a gravel bar near a small +stream flowing into the Arctic Ocean, the exact location was about latitude 69° +10´ and longitude 141° west, or about 25 miles south of the Arctic Ocean +near the international boundary between Canada and Alaska. The nest was +first observed by Sir Frederick Lambart of the Canadian Coast and Geodetic +Survey, and was later identified by myself. Sir Frederick describes the nest +as follows: “The nest was situated in the middle of an elevated gravel bar +open to the sky for fully 50 feet all around. The nest was just alongside a +small rock; there were no sticks or any form of nest material, it consisted +merely of a semispherical hollow in dry fine and coarse gravel. Four eggs +were in the nest, I should say about the size of a ptarmigan’s, brownish blue +and mottled very much like a sandpiper’s. The young birds were noted to +have come out of the eggs July 9.”</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</span></p> + +<p>Ten years later Olaus J. Murie (1924) collected a downy, young +wandering tattler on Jennie Creek, a small tributary of Savage +River, in the Alaska Range, on June 9, 1922. The following year he +completed the record by finding a nest and collecting the first and +only set of eggs ever taken. He has given us a very good account +of the whole proceeding, from which I quote, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The following day, July 1, we continued up Savage River 9 miles and made +permanent camp. We had been on the lookout for the birds and I had pointed +out to Mr. Buhmann one in the distance, that he might have an idea for +what we were looking. About noon Mr. Buhmann and my brother were riding +on the wagon, while I walked ahead over the usual gravel bars, when Mr. +Buhmann suddenly called out to me, “Is that one of your birds?” I turned +and saw a wandering tattler flying away. The bird had been flushed by the +horses. We all three walked back carefully beside the wagon and in a few +moments spied the nest and eggs a short distance to the rear, not over 6 +inches from the wheel track! Mr. Buhmann picked up one of the eggs, wishing, +as he enthusiastically explained, to be the first one who had ever handled +the egg of a wandering tattler. I explained that the eggs should not be disturbed +until photographed, and it was carefully replaced in the nest. A series +of exposures was made of the nest and eggs, and we moved away some distance +with our outfit and prepared our lunch. In the meantime the bird returned +and settled on the nest. Several photographs were then taken of the bird on +the eggs, the last one at a distance of about 10 feet or less. The nest and +eggs were then taken and carried to our camping ground.</p> + +<p>All our observations indicate that this nesting site is characteristic, that +the wandering tattler prefers the gravel bars of mountain streams, as typified +by Savage River. These rivers are rapid and split into numerous channels, +sometimes in an intricate network over the gravelly valley. This nest was +found on Savage River about 5 miles above the mouth of Jennie Creek at an +elevation of about 4,000 feet. It was placed on a gravel bar about 30 feet +from the nearest water, and was sunk in a shallow depression in the gravel. +It was well built, unusually elaborate for a shore bird. It was composed principally +of fine roots carefully woven into a firm structure, including a number +of twigs around the edges. Small bits of twigs and some dry leaves had been +used for lining. It was so compact that I had no difficulty in picking it up +and transporting it to camp. The diameter of the nest to the edges of the finely +woven body was about 5 inches, but, of course, some of the twigs extended +much farther.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The eggs taken by Mr. Murie on Savage River, Alaska, +July 1, 1923, are now in the United States National Museum and +are, so far as I know, the only eggs in existence. In shape they are +between pyriform and subpyriform, and they have a slight gloss. +The ground color is between “glaucous” and “greenish glaucous,” +as in some crow’s eggs. They are spotted and blotched irregularly, +rather heavily near the larger end and rather sparsely elsewhere, +with dark browns, from “seal brown” or “bone brown” to “burnt +umber” or “Verona brown”; there are some elongated splashes and +some small, inconspicuous, underlying spot of various shades of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</span>“brownish drab.” They measure 43.3 by <b>32.7</b>, <b>44.5</b> by 31.4, <b>44.1</b> by +<b>31.5</b>, and 43.7 by 32.3 millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—The young are able to run about soon after they are +hatched and are carefully guarded by both parents. An adult, secured +by Mr. Murie with the downy young, proved to be a male. +“A whistled <i>cheep</i>, imitating a chick, would bring the excited bird +within a few feet.” Mr. Jessup writes that the mother bird was +much distressed and attempted to lure him from her little one by +feigning lameness.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—Mr. Murie (1924) has described the downy young +very well, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>These downy young may be described as follows: Under parts dull white with +a faint indication of grayish on upper breast and lower fore neck; upper parts +pale gray, with a very slight suggestion of buffy on wings, rump, and tail, more +evident in the fresh specimens than in the skin; upper parts narrowly, irregularly, +and indistinctly barred with blackish, with dull black loral and postocular +streaks and with irregular black spots on hind pileum. In a colored sketch +made from freshly killed bird, tarsus and upper part of toes appear dull +glaucous green; the under surface of foot olive yellow; bill dull glaucous blue.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Another bird which I have examined, as a dried skin, does not +show any buffy tints. A young bird, mainly in juvenal plumage but +still downy on the hind neck, chin and forehead, taken on September +5, is from “deep mouse gray” to “dark olive gray” above, with very +faint whitish tips; the wing coverts have more prominent white +edgings; the chest is “pallid mouse gray,” and the flanks “pale mouse +gray,” both more or less indistinctly barred; the rest of the under +parts are white. A limited postjuvenal molt of the body plumage +occurs in September, producing the first winter plumage; this is much +like the adult, except that the juvenal wing coverts, some of the +scapulars and the mottled plumage of the breast and flanks are retained. +Some young birds apparently assume a plumage which is +practically adult at the first prenuptial molt in April.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete postnuptial molt from August to January, +the wings being molted last, between October and January. I have +seen birds in full nuptial plumage from April 13 to September 14 and +in full winter plumage as late as April 12. In winter adults the upper +parts are slightly lighter gray than in summer, the sides of the +head, chest and flanks are still lighter gray and the chin and belly +are white. The partial prenuptial molt occurs in April.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The usual feeding grounds of the wandering tattler are +the rocky shores, where it searches for its food among the kelp-covered +rocks at the water’s edge, following the receding waves and +nimbly dodging the incoming breakers or making short flights to +avoid the surf. If over-taken and drenched it flies to a rock, shakes +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</span>the water from its plumage and soon resumes its feeding. B. J. +Bretherton (1896) says that on Kodiak Island:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This species seemed to habitually frequent the sand or gravel beaches in +preference to rocky localities, and had regular feeding grounds to which they +resorted at certain stages of the tide, returning regularly each day at the same +time. Their food consists largely of decapods together with small crabs, +marine worms, and minute mollusks.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Its food seems to be mainly insects, but includes small crustaceans, +minute mollusks, marine worms, and other small marine animals. +The contents of six stomachs, reported on by Preble and McAtee +(1923) consisted of “flies (Diptera), 46.1 per cent; caddis flies 30.6 +per cent; amphipods, 16 per cent; mollusks, 3.6 per cent; and beetles +1.1 per cent.”</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The movements of wandering tattlers are often suggestive +of spotted sandpipers with which they are sometimes associated; +they indulge in the same “tip-up” motion of the body, though less +frequently; and their flight is very similar, with intermittent strokes +of down-curved wings. W. Leon Dawson (1923) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When it alights, it sits for some time motionless in a plover like attitude, +with its long bill held horizontally, invisible, in the dull light of a foggy day, +unless, perchance, outlined against the surf. At other times the bird will betray +its uneasiness by a jetting motion of the tail.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In his notes on the Farallones, Mr. Dawson (1911) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Contrary to earlier statements these tattlers do spend a considerable portion +of their time upon the higher ground. The tiny bowlder-strewn meadow surrounding +my earlier camp (just east of Franconia Beach) was a favorite resting +place for them, and I am inclined to think the birds spent the night there, +for some were invariably startled upon my first appearance mornings. Having +a common affection for the tide reefs, wandering tattlers are not infrequently +found in loose association with black turnstones; but when put to flight they +pay no attention whatever to the fortunes of their chance shipmates nor to +others of their own kind.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Dr. E. W. Nelson (1883) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Their note is a loud, ringing whistle, which seems specially fitted to the +bird and the haunts it occupies, and as the shrill cry reechoes from the towering +cliffs and ledges at the base of which it feeds its peculiar character and +intonation might lead one to fancy some genie of the rocks was uttering its +cry. When the birds are approached by boat as they are feeding along the +water’s edge they ascend gradually, with an expression of mild curiosity, and +pass from ledge to ledge until they reach a jutting point on the face of the +cliff or its brow, where they stand in relief, like beautiful clear-cut statuettes, +and do not utter a sound or move until they are still further alarmed, when +they take flight, uttering at the same moment their loud note before mentioned.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—Doctor Nelson (1880) describes its note as “a loud, ringing +<i>kla</i>, <i>kla</i>, <i>kla</i>,” and again he (1887) calls it “a loud, clear, flutelike +<i>tu</i>, <i>tu</i>, <i>tu</i>, <i>tu</i>.” Mr. Dawson (1923) says it is “a quavering cry, somewhat +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</span>like the <i>tew</i>, <i>tew</i>, <i>tew</i> of the greater yellowlegs, but more subdued.” +Mr. Murie (1924) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Whenever I approached the home grounds of a wandering tattler he would +fly to meet me and would scold excitedly, uttering a vigorous <i>deedle-deedle-deedle-deedle-dee</i>, +with variations which I failed to record minutely.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—Doctor Nelson (1887) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They usually reappear on the seacoast about St. Michaels the last of July +or very early in August and remain until from the 1st to 10th of September. +During their presence on the coast of Norton Sound they show a decided +preference for the most rugged and rock-bound parts of the shore, rarely or +never occurring elsewhere. It is a frequent and regular summer bird on the +rocky parts of the coast to the vicinity of Bering Straits and occurs on the +islands and Siberian shore of Bering Sea.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>William Palmer (1899) says that on the Pribilof Islands:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>It is the first species to return in the fall; adult birds, July 10 and afterwards. +Usually in pairs on the surf-swept rocks, but sometimes seen—usually +the brownish, unbarred, and less wary immature—on open sandy places, and +sometimes with the turnstones on a sandy beach. They are not shy, but +are seldom noticed when perched on the wet rocks, which harmonize so well +with their color. Solitary birds remain quiet and unseen and will permit +one to approach quite close, frequently startling us as they get up suddenly, +almost under our very feet, and uttering their loud, shrill cry, flying off to +another resting place.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>From the Aleutian Islands and the interior of Alaska there is a +southward migration to the islands in the Pacific, where it spends +the winter, and a more general movement southward along the +Pacific coast of North America. D. E. Brown’s notes record it on +the coast of Washington from August 10 to September 15. It has +been recorded in California early in July, but these were perhaps +summer sojourners; the return movement seems to come along between +July 15 and August. H. W. Henshaw (1902) says that the +return migrants begin to appear in the Hawaiian Islands “about the +middle or latter part of August”; he noticed that “the first comers +are adults, chiefly males, and still in nuptial dress.”</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—The Santa Barbara Islands, off the coast of southern +California, mark the northern limit of the normal winter range of +the wandering tattler, where a few may always be found in winter. +Most of the birds go farther south. W. B. Alexander tells me that +the wandering tattler occasionally visits Cape York, North Queensland, +and there is a specimen, unquestionably of this species, in the +Museum of Comparative Zoölogy in Cambridge, from Australia.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Western North and South America, eastern Asia, and +Oceanica.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</span></p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The nest and eggs of the wandering tattler have +actually been found only on one occasion (Savage River, Alaska +[Murie]); but the evidence of young birds seems sufficient to establish +additional breeding stations in Alaska (Mount McKinley and +probably Montague Island); and in Yukon (Russell Mountains). +They probably breed also in eastern Siberia (Plover Bay). Nonbreeding +specimens have been observed or collected in summer at +many localities on the Pacific coast, south to Lower California +(Socorro Island, San Jose Island, and Cocos Island); and the +Hawaiian Islands (Cocoanut Island).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range of the wandering tattler extends +north to the Philippine Islands (Mindanao); the Hawaiian +Islands (Laysan, Kauai, and Hawaii); and probably, rarely, Oregon +(Cannon Beach). East to probably, rarely Oregon (Cannon +Beach); California (Santa Cruz Island, and Santa Monica); Lower +California (Cedros Island, Comondu, and San Jose Island); and +the Galapagos Islands (Abingdon, Indefatigable, Chatham, and +Hood). South to the Galapagos Island (Hood and Albemarle); +Paumotu Islands; Society Islands (Huaheine); Samoa; Fiji Islands +(Ovalau); New Hebrides (Aneiteum); and northeastern Australia +(Cape York). West to northeastern Australia (Cape York); and +the Philippine Islands (Mindanao).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: Washington, +Shoalwater Bay, May 1; Alaska, Forrester Island, May 7, Cape +Prince of Wales, May 11, Sanak Island, May 15, Unalaska Island, +May 18, and Mount McKinley, May 18; and Siberia, Copper Island, +May 17.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Guerrero, Acapulco, April +30; Lower California, Cedros Island, April 24, Socorro Island, May +10, Guadeloupe Island, May 18, and Clarion Island, May 20; California, +San Nicholas Island, May 11, and Eureka, May 18; Washington, +Neah Bay, May 20, and Flattery Rock, June 2; and British +Columbia, Courtenay, May 23, and Comox, June 4.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival in the fall, are: British +Columbia, Okanagan, July 26; Washington, Clallam Bay, July 16, +and Quillayute Needles, July 17; Oregon, Seal Rocks, July 22, and +Crater Lake, July 27; California, Farallon Islands, July 13, Monterey +Bay, July 14, and Santa Cruz, August 1; and Lower California, +Los Coronados Islands, August 6, and Cedros Island, August 14.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Alaska, St. Paul Island, October +4, and Unalaska, October 16; British Columbia, Okanagan, September +20; and Washington, Seattle, September 18, and Clallam Bay, +September 19.</p> + +<p><i>Egg Dates.</i>—Alaska: One record, July 1, 1925.</p> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">HETEROSCELUS BREVIPES</span> <span class="smaller">(Vieillot)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">POLYNESIAN TATTLER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>Three specimens of this Asiatic sandpiper have been taken in the +Pribilof Islands; the first was secured on St. Paul Island, October 4, +1911, by M. C. Marsh; the other two were taken by G. Dallas Hanna, +on the same island, September 2, 1917, and September 17, 1919. +These constitute the only North American records. It is not easily +distinguished in life from the wandering tattler and so may have +occurred much oftener on our extreme western coasts.</p> + +<p>Dr. Leonard Stejneger (1885), who took an adult male on Bering +Island, in the Commanders, May 28, 1882, devotes considerable space +to showing that this is a species distinct from <i>incanus</i>; but some +recent writers have treated it as a subspecies. The principal differences +are that <i>brevipes</i> is somewhat smaller, has a shorter nasal +groove, and has the tarsus scutellated instead of reticulated at the +back; the belly and under tail coverts are pure white in all plumages, +whereas in <i>incanus</i> these parts are barred in the nuptial plumage; +and the upper tail coverts, which are nearly uniform gray in <i>incanus</i>; +are distinctly barred with white. The structural differences would +seem to warrant specific rank.</p> + +<p>The Polynesian tattler is supposed to breed in eastern Siberia, from +Lake Baikal to Kamchatka, but, so far as I know, its nest has never +been found and nothing is known about its nesting habits, eggs, or +young.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—Except for the specific characters outlined above the +plumages and molts are similar to those of the wandering tattler. In +the juvenal plumage the feathers of the upper parts are notched with +light buff or white; the upper tail coverts are tipped and irregularly +barred with the same colors; the upper breast and flanks are suffused +with light gray, more or less mottled on the chest; the tail feathers +and wing coverts are tipped or notched or barred with pale buff or +white; they are otherwise like winter adults.</p> + +<p>This plumage is worn until September, when the body plumage, +some of the tail feathers, and some of the wing coverts are molted, to +produce the first winter plumage, which can be distinguished from +the adult only by the retained tail feathers and wing coverts. In +some birds a partial prenuptial molt produces a plumage which is +nearly adult, but in others this molt is suppressed and a molt into the +adult winter plumage comes later.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete postnuptial molt between July and January, +and a partial prenuptial molt, involving the body plumage, the +tail and some of the wing coverts, scapulars, and tertials.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</span></p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The habits, and probably the food, of the Polynesian +tattler are apparently similar to those of our American bird. Doctor +Hanna (1920) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I had an opportunity to observe this bird for a while with two wandering +tattlers in view at the time. The actions of the two species were practically the +same. They feed very close to the sea on rocky shores and when disturbed fly +lazily, rarely more than 100 yards. The wandering tattlers on this occasion +appeared perceptibly larger than the Polynesian and the notes of the two were +different. The latter uttered an irregular screech not of the same intensity or +pitch, whereas the former gave its usual call, a series of 6 to 10 individual notes +uttered in the same pitch and rapid succession, but each of shortening duration.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—This tattler migrates southward in winter through the +Kurile Islands and Japan to the Malay Archipelago, the Philippines, +and Australia. W. B. Alexander (1926) says of it in North +Queensland:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This was the commonest species of sandpiper on the beaches at Cairns and +Yarrabah early in September, feeding in small parties. The first were noted on +September 1. They are easily recognized by their gray plumage and yellow +legs, though the latter are not so brightly colored as those of the two species +known in America as yellowlegs.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Eastern Asia, Melanesia, and Australia; casual on the +Pribilof Islands.</p> + +<p>The Polynesian tattler breeds in eastern Siberia, from Lake Baikal +to Kamchatka; in migration it passes through China, Japan, and +the Philippine Islands to winter quarters in the Malay Archipelago +and northern Australia (Queensland).</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—This species has been detected in North America +on three occasions, all on St. Paul Island, of the Pribilof group, +Alaska (October 4, 1911, September 2, 1917, and September 17, +1919).</p> + +<div class="chapter" id="Ruff"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">PHILOMACHUS PUGNAX</span> <span class="smaller">(Linnaeus)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">RUFF</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The claim of the ruff to a place in the American list is a much +stronger one than that of most of the Palaearctic species which figure +in it, as it has occurred three times in Greenland, once in Canada, +on many occasions in the eastern States, in Barbados, Guadeloupe, +and South America.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</span></p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—Apparently the ruff migrates chiefly by night and in +this connection it is noticeable that the period of its greatest activity +in the breeding season is during the twilight of the early morning +hours. Naumann (1887) states that the first birds to arrive are +the young of the preceding year, and that the adult males are the +next to follow while they in turn are succeeded by the old females. +Owing to the enormous development of the feathered ruff from which +the species derives its names, the males are readily distinguished +during the breeding season even in flight and on the ground can be +recognized at almost any distance.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—The breeding habits of the ruff are so remarkable +that it is necessary to treat of them in considerable detail. When +the males reach the breeding ground they are in full breeding plumage, +the bare skin of the face being covered with bright yellow +warts, while a disk of feathers protects the neck and two tufts +project from each side of the head. The extraordinary variation in +the coloring of these feather adornments renders it possible to +identify individual birds, as it is rare to see two with even approximately +similar coloring, and this enabled Mr. Selous (1906) to make +the valuable observations which are referred to below.</p> + +<p>Where ruffs are common, as in North Holland, one finds from +time to time bare areas of ground where the grass has been worn +away in patches. They are the playing grounds of the ruffs, and +were known in England technically as “hills.” During the daytime +they are resorted to from time to time by the male birds, which +may often be seen sparring with one another, but the significance +of these meetings was little understood until Edmund Selous (1906) +spent a fortnight in the spring of 1906 in Holland, during which +he concealed himself in a hide which commanded a good view of +the “hill” at close quarters, and was often on the watch before +daylight. The diary of his observations was first published in the +<i>Zoologist</i> for 1906 and 1907, and is too lengthy and discursive to be +reproduced here, but in the following condensed account most of the +essential facts have been preserved. The “hill” under observation +was roughly about 10 paces by 6, with 11 distinct patches where +the grass had been worn bare, besides a couple of others less plainly +marked. There were other similar “hills” in the neighborhood, all +much alike, placed on dry ground, in the neighborhood of marshes. +They are resorted to year after year, and bear traces of excrement +from previous seasons, while the grass is much worn away owing +to the presence of the birds. Some of the Dutch “hills” are quite +close to or actually in the way of paths, and the birds when disturbed +by passers-by will return to the ground within a few minutes. Like +many other Dutch birds they show much indifference to the presence +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</span>of man, owing to the fact that no shooting is permitted during the +breeding season. On April 14 a single male was disturbed by Selous +from the “hill” at 7 a. m. and did not return, but on the next day a +flock of eight or nine birds arrived and at once began to fight, but +not on the “hill.” It soon became evident that in order to be in +place before the arrival of the birds it was necessary to get into +hiding before dawn. By April 16 the “hill” was in regular use, +each male resorting to the same stand and sitting there, from time +to time rising and making a slight demonstration with erected tufts +and ruff, sometimes followed by a slight sparring match with one +of the other males, but when not engaged in fighting spending the +time quite amicably side by side, in some cases almost touching. In +the afternoon a similar state of things prevailed, but the proceedings +were quieter and more subdued. When sparring the birds “would +rush and leap high into the air against each other, rushing away and +not leaping again as they came down,” and this activity was generally +more pronounced when a reeve appeared on the ground. The +other birds on occasions of this kind also rushed about in wild +excitement, suddenly pulling themselves up with the head extended +forward and remaining in this position motionless, perhaps then +rushing in another direction and then gradually sinking down +quickly. When a reeve arrived at the “hill,” where perhaps a +dozen males were present, after the first wave of excitement had +passed she would thread her way among the ruffs, which as she +approached sank down to the ground by her side with bowed head. +Her preference for one particular male was shown by halting at +his side and gently nibbling with her bill the feathers at the back +of his neck. If copulation followed, there was no interference on +the part of the other males present, except perhaps occasionally by +accident in the course of excited running to and fro.</p> + +<p>After persistent watching it became evident that the attentions of +the reeves were very unevenly distributed among the regular habitues +of the “hill.” There were two conspicuously handsome males—one a +bird with a golden-brown ruff and the other with a blue-black one—and +these two seemed to be selected far more frequently than the +other ruffs. The few attempts made by males to force the compliance +of the female were quite unsuccessful. Perhaps it is due to this that +attempts to pair between two male birds frequently took place and, +strange to relate, even between two reeves also. Selection on the part +of the hen birds apparently bore no relation to the fighting powers of +the male, although one serious fight, which lasted some three or four +minutes, took place, during which the two birds concerned fought like +demons, but finally ceased by mutual consent. The two selected birds +were, however, certainly among the finest and handsomest birds on +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</span>the ground. While the stations were usually occupied by the same +birds day after day, there were times when over 20 birds were present, +so it is probable that males from other “hills” call in at times. +While it was clear that one ruff paired with several reeves, it was +much more difficult to prove that the reeves paired with more than +one male, owing to their general similarity of appearance, though it +is probable that this was the case. The following extract from Selous +(1906) gives a good description of the characteristic sparring:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Each ruff has certainly a place of its own, and the most envenomed fights +appear to me to result from one bird pitching down in another’s place when he +flies in. The aggrieved bird instantly rushes at the intruder and there is a +fight which may last for a longer or shorter time. The birds have then a perfectly +frantic appearance. They kick, strike with their wings, and especially +endeavor to bite or peck each other. This biting is very noticeable, the mandibles +seeming to snap with rage. They leap commonly before they close and then +continue to do so as a matter of course, the object seeming to be, as with other +birds, to get above the adversary and strike down upon him with wings and +feet and bill. Of course, when one bird is displaced by another, others are displaced +also, leading to general commotion and, moreover, the mere anticipation +of any fresh arrival is matter for excitement for every ruff on the ground.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Summarizing the results of Mr. Selous’ observations, it becomes +evident that the “hills” are the pairing grounds to which both males +and females resort, but the period of the greatest activity is during +the early morning from about 3.30 a. m. onward. Each male has a +definite place and the choice of a mate rests entirely with the female, +the males adopting an attitude of supplication, crouching low with +partially spread wings, tail and beak pointing to the ground. The +hen marks her preference by nibbling the back of the neck of the +prostrate male with her bill, and soon afterwards coition takes place, +the surrounding males remaining usually quiescent. One reeve was +seen to pair with two ruffs in succession and it is probable that she +is polyandrous as the ruff is certainly polygamous. There seemed to +be no connection between the fighting power of the males and the +preference exercised so strikingly by the females, but, on the other +hand, the favored ruffs were apparently always handsome and strikingly +colored birds.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The reeve makes her nest within a reasonable distance +of the “hill,” but not very close to it. Naumann (1887) says that +it is never less than a hundred paces distant, and most of those which +I have seen were within a quarter of a mile. In the Dutch water +meadows the usual nesting site is among fine, thickly growing grass, +where it is difficult to see unless one’s eye is caught by a glimpse of +the nest hollow. In the marshes of Lapland, where vegetation is +more backward, it may be found among clumps of sedge and rushes. +It is built entirely of fine grasses, and would frequently be overlooked +if it were not for the sight of the bird when flushed.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</span></p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—Normally four; sets of three are quite exceptional and are +probably second or third layings. They are pyriform in shape, thin +shelled, and, as is frequently the case with the eggs of waders, large +for the size of the bird. The ground color varies from brownish +yellow to pale olive brown as a rule, but occasionally has a greenish +tinge, while varieties with a clear pale blue ground are not very +scarce. The markings consist of spots and blotches of brown ranging +from umber to dark sepia and ashy grey shellmarks, more numerous +at the large end. White eggs have been recorded. The measurements +of 143 eggs, chiefly by the writer, average 43.97 by 30.7 millimeters; +the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>47.5</b> by 30.5, +43.2 by <b>32.1</b>, <b>39.2</b> by 31.6, and 42.9 by <b>28</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p>They are usually laid in central Europe during the latter half +of May and early in June, occasionally in the second week of May. +In northern Europe most eggs are found during the latter half of +June. Only one brood is reared in the season.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Incubation is performed by the female alone. Naumann +(1887) gives the incubation period as 17 to 19 days, but this is +probably too low an estimate and recently Heinroth has recorded 27 +days. From observations made by Mr. W. H. St. Quinten on young +hatched in captivity they leave the nest very soon after hatching, +apparently directly the down is dry. The reeve is a good mother, +and I have seen one when flushed from eggs on the point of hatching +run from the nest, flapping her wings in a helpless way as if unable +to fly. Another bird was also seen trying to distract attention by +running with every feather erect, looking more like some small +mammal than a bird.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The plumages and moults are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds, edited by H. F. Witherby.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The ruff is mainly insectivorous, feeding largely on beetles +(Coleoptera), chiefly the smaller species. Jäckel records specimens of +the following genera: <i>Agonum</i>, <i>Bembidium</i>, <i>Parnus</i>, <i>Cyclonotum</i>, +<i>Sitones</i>, <i>Pisodes</i>, <i>Rhinoncus</i>, <i>Philhydrus</i>. Weevils are also mentioned +by Florence. Among the Orthoptera remains of grasshoppers +were found by Slater. Neuroptera met with include caddis worms +and cases (Phryganeidae) and larvae of <i>Ephemera</i>, Trichoptera +(<i>Limnophilus</i> by Jäckel) who also records <i>Naucoris</i> (Hemiptera). +It will be noted that most of the above are aquatic forms. Diptera +are a staple food in the north, including larvae of Tipulidae and +many small species. Of Mollusca, Slater records small fresh water +bivalves, Collett worms (<i>Lumbrici</i>). In winter the food is more +largely vegetable in character, though fresh water algae and seeds +of <i>Rumex</i> have been recorded in summer. Rice is frequently found +in birds killed in India and Mellor also found in seven cases nothing +but durra grains (Sorghum) from 19 to 228 in number.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</span></p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—The ruff is an extremely silent bird. One may live among +them in the Dutch polders for weeks together in the spring, and +never hear a sound from them, except a very low guttural or quacking +note from a reeve when disturbed from a family of young. Naumann +(1887) however describes a note <i>kack</i>, <i>kack</i>, <i>kick</i>, <i>kack</i>, which is +probably the same as that which Slater writes as <i>wick</i>, repeated +rapidly several times. Unless much persecuted it is confiding in its +habits and pays little attention to the presence of men.</p> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—In England its extermination was primarily due to the +reckless way in which the breeding stock was netted not only in +autumn but also on arrival in spring on the “hilling” grounds, in +order to be fattened for the table. Montagu’s account of the state of +things in his day has been quoted at length in many books on British +birds, so that it is not necessary to repeat it here. As Pennant spoke +of 40 or 50 dozen birds being taken by a single fowler in a season it +is not surprising that the stock was rapidly reduced to so low a level +that in spite of belated efforts to protect the birds and their eggs, it +has now practically disappeared. On the continent where it is still +locally common it has to contend against other avian enemies, more +especially the harriers (<i>Circus</i>), but also the goshawk, peregrine, and +to some extent gulls and crows.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The distinctive plumes of the male are shed in June and in +July the autumn plumage is assumed even in the extreme north. +The males begin to disappear from their breeding haunts in central +Europe in late July and early August, while the females are said to +leave in September.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—In their winter quarters ruffs are generally sociable and +are to be met with in small flocks, which show a preference to fresh +water marshes rather than the sea coast. In India and the Sudan +the flooded fields are a great attraction and the staple food consists +of grain.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—Formerly at many places in England from +Northumberland southward, lingering until recently in Norfolk. +Belgium, locally in North France, Holland, Denmark, North Germany, +and Bavaria (Jäckel). Hungary, Czechoslovakia, the Baltic +Republics, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Russia north to Kolguev, +Waigatz, and Dolgoi and south to Bessarabia and Orenburg. In +Asia, Siberia north to 72° on the Yenisei and east to the Lena and +Kolyma valleys, south to Dauria, Turgai and Uralsk.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—From Europe through Africa south to Cape +Province, but scarce on passage in the Atlantic Islands. Asia, south to +India, Ceylon (scarce), Burma, also recorded from China and Japan, +Borneo (Labuan), etc.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</span></p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—At the Straits of Gibraltar the northward +movement begins in January and does not cease till May, but it is +at its height in April. Some birds winter in the Mediterranean +region and these have usually gone by the middle of April. In the +eastern Mediterranean the passage begins in the Ionian Isles about +March 15 and in Corfu in March.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—The return passage through southern Spain +takes place in August and September, while in Greece, where it is +less noticeable, it appears to take place toward the end of September.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The species has been rather frequently detected +on the Atlantic coast of North America and (rarely) in the interior +eastern States. Among these occurrences are: Ontario, Toronto +Island, spring of 1882; Nova Scotia, near Halifax, May 27, 1892; +New Brunswick, Grand Manan; Maine, Scarboro, April 10, 1870, +Upton, September 8, 1874, and Camden, September 14, 1900; New +Hampshire, Seabrook, September 23, 1907; Massachusetts, Newburyport, +May 20, 1871, Chatham, September 11, 1880, and Nantucket, +July, 1901; Rhode Island, Seaconnet Point, July 30, 1900, and Point +Judith, August 31, 1903; New York, two on Long Island, one of +which was taken May 18, 1868, and Freeport, September 27, 1914; +New Jersey, Barnegat (Elliott collection); Virginia, Four-mile +Run, September 3, 1894; North Carolina, Raleigh, May 6, 1892; +Ohio, Licking Reservoir, November 11, 1872, and Columbus, April +23, 1878; and Indiana, English Lake, April 12, 1905.</p> + +<p>It also has been taken in the Lesser Antilles, Barbados, previous +to 1848; Colombia, probably between the Rio Negro and the Orinoco +or adjacent regions; and Alaska, St. Paul Island, September 7, 1910. +It is of rare occurrence in Japan (Yezo). There is one record from +Iceland (Reykjavik, September, 1820).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—In Holland, 4 dates between May 7 and 14; 18 dates +between May 15 and 31, 8 dates between June 1 and 22. In Lapland +and North Russia, 16 dates between June 8 and 27.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Upland"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">BARTRAMIA LONGICAUDA</span> <span class="smaller">(Bechstein)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">UPLAND PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>Let us be thankful that this gentle and lovely bird is no longer +called Bartramian sandpiper. It is a sandpiper truly enough, but +one that has adopted the haunts and many of the habits of the plovers. +To those who love the rolling or hilly pasture lands of the +east or the broad flat prairies of the middle west, it will always be +known as the upland or “field plover” or “prairie dove,” or, more +affectionately, as “quailie.” It is a characteristic bird of the prairies +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</span>and wide open grassy fields, where it once abounded in enormous +numbers. Excessive shooting for the market, where it was much in +demand, reduced its numbers to an alarmingly low ebb. Dr. Thomas +S. Roberts (1919) says that, in Minnesota,</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Fifty years ago it was present all through the summer, everywhere in open +country, in countless thousands. Now it is nearing extinction. Here and +there an occasional breeding pair may yet be found, but they are lonely +occupants of the places where their ancestors dwelt in vast numbers.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>And with the disappearing prairies have gone these and other +interesting birds that made the wide open places so attractive. When +I visited the Quill Lake region in Saskatchewan in 1917, I found +that practically all the prairies had been burned over or cultivated; +the long-billed curlew had entirely disappeared, though recently abundant +there, and I saw only one pair of chestnut-collared longspurs; +but some of the upland plover were adapting themselves to the new +conditions and were nesting in cultivated fields, much as the spotted +sandpipers and the killdeer have learned to nest in grain fields and +truck gardens. Perhaps such adaptation may be the salvation of a +useful and attractive species. Some observers report it as already +increasing in numbers.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—W. H. Hudson (1922) describes the beginning of the +spring migration from the pampas of South America, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The north migration as a rule begins about the 15th of February and continues +to the 15th of March, and it is at the beginning of the former month +that the disquiet becomes noticeable. Now on one occasion the season of +unrest began much earlier, in the month of January, increased from day to +day and week to week in the most extraordinary way, and continued to about +the middle of March before the birds began to fly north, the migration continuing +through March. On any day in February when out riding I would see +from time to time a bird spring up with its wild alarm cry and flight, and after +going a little distance drop down again. Then in a minute or two another, +farther away, would start up with its cry; and sitting still and watching and +listening, I could see the birds rise up here and there all over the plain—rise +with a cry, then settle down again; and if one rode a 100 miles to any side +he would find it the same everywhere. The birds were in a continual state of +agitation, of fear; and though this state began so much sooner than usual, the +actual migration did not begin till a month later than the usual time.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Dr. Alexander Wetmore (1926), writing from the same general +region, says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At Tucuman, Tucuman, five were heard early in the evening of April 1 as they +passed over the city traveling due north during a slow rain accompanied by +heavy mist. On the night of April 5 under similar conditions an extensive +flight of shore birds began at a quarter of 10 and continued until half past 11. +During this period J. L. Peters, with whom I was traveling at the time, and +I identified the call of the upland plover from 38 individuals. The birds were +in company with yellowlegs, solitary sandpipers, and a few golden plover. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</span>How many passed unheard in the darkness there was no way to know. The +calling of these birds when in northward migration was a phenomenon of +common knowledge in Tucuman during that season in the year, but all commented +upon the fact that the birds seemed to have decreased greatly in +abundance in recent years.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The earliest birds reach Texas and Louisiana early in March. +Illustrating the abundance of this species in Texas 40 years ago, +G. B. Benners (1887) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At the former place we found immense flocks on the prairie, and they were so +tame that the flock would part in the middle and let us drive between them. +We often shot enough birds while going through a flock in this way to last for +several meals. When they thought we did not see them they would stand perfectly +still, and being the same color as their surroundings they easily escaped +detection.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>From there the main migration route seems to be directly northward +between the Mississippi River and the Rocky Mountains.</p> + +<p>Fred J. Pierce writes to me:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On my rambles over the rolling country of Buchanan County, Iowa, in the +early spring, I usually hear the Bartramian sandpiper and see the small speck +high in the sky that I know is his form. A damp, cloudy morning seems to be +the preferred time for the bird’s sky circling, but it may be found frequently in +the early morning, too. Cloudy days are the days which it enjoys most, it +appears.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Edward S. Thomas tells me that he has seen it in Ohio as early as +March 26, but that the average date of arrival is April 2. It is not +recorded east of Cuba in the spring, but some birds migrate across +from Yucatan to Cuba and Florida and then up the Atlantic coast. +When this species bred more commonly in New England it used to +arrive in April, but now it is very rare here.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—The courtship flight song of the upland plover is well +described in some notes sent to me by Fred J. Pierce, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The bird’s song is very interesting, but it is given little attention in books +relating to ornithology. On still wings, these large birds circle slowly about, +usually so high as to be mere specks in the sky, and give their shrill, penetrating +whistle, which will carry nearly a mile, depending upon the wind and the altitude +of the whistler. First there are a few notes sounding like water gurgling +from a large bottle, then comes the loud <i>whip-whee-ee-you</i>, long drawn out and +weirdly thrilling. When I first heard this strange cry I at once thought of +some species of hawk as being the author of it, and I have known others to +think the same thing. It is too loud and penetrating a cry to be attributed to +one of the sandpipers. I have heard the bird whistling in this manner as late +as July, but I do not believe that this is a common practice. On more than one +occasion I have seen the bird, after circling at such height as to be almost out +of sight, close its wings and shoot to earth like a falling stone. This thrilling +performance is similar to that of the prairie horned lark, which takes a headfirst +drop to earth when it has finished singing its contribution to the usual +spring morning chorus.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</span></p> + +<p>Another pretty version of the courtship is given by Katharine U. +Hunter (1916) thus:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>It was the springtime (1916). The prolonged wail, vague and sad, of the +plovers rose in our upland pasture. I watched them carry on their odd courtship; +hopping toward each other, twittering, flying away, then repeating it all +again, the hopping, twittering, and retreating. Ungainly, spirit-voiced birds! +Once from out the black, vibrant night came the eerie, long-drawn whistle of a +plover lover.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—My first upland plover’s nest was found on May 25, 1900, +near the western end of Marthas Vineyard, Mass. The birds were +still fairly common here in those days and there were at least +three pairs of them breeding in this and adjoining pastures. The +nest was on a knoll in a sheep pasture where the grass had been +cropped short except for scattered tufts, where it grew from 7 to 10 +inches high, offering the necessary concealment. In one of these +tufts, about a foot in diameter, a hollow had been scratched, 4 or 5 +inches in diameter and nearly 3 inches deep; it was lined with small +bits of dried grass and held four handsome eggs.</p> + +<p>Since then I have found several nests in Saskatchewan. These +nests were all similarly located on the dry, grassy prairies, slight +hollows in the ground, about 4 inches in diameter and 2 inches deep, +generally well hidden in rather long, thick grass; they were lined +with pieces of dry grass, and the growing grass was artfully arched +over them for protection. The birds usually sat very closely; once +we drove over a nest, flushing the bird under the wagon; and several +times we were able to part the grass over the nest or even touch +the bird before she left. She usually ran or fluttered away for a +few feet and then ran about near us, with her long neck stretched +up above the grass, watching us and uttering her <i>quip-ip-ip-ip</i> notes +of protest.</p> + +<p>Nests found by others have been similarly described, but Prof. +W. B. Barrows (1912) says that—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>in Michigan, it frequently nests in wet grounds, although the nest itself is +usually placed on one of the drier spots. We have seen the birds nesting in +two instances in good snipe bogs where the mud was ankle deep and dry spots +few and far between.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Prof. William Rowan (1926) says that in Alberta—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>the nests found were very variable in make-up and situation. One had no +lining whatever and consisted of a mere scrape in the ground. This was in +a hollow right in the open on a huge sandy area with but sparse vegetation, +on which long-billed curlews (<i>Numenius americanus</i>) were nesting. Others +were in clumps of rough brush, and this is probably typical for this locality. +Another was in long grass. The most elaborate lining noted consisted of +leaves, bents, and small twigs. One clutch of five was found and one of three, +the latter no doubt incomplete, as the bird was not about and the eggs were +fresh.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_59">[Pg 59]</span></p> + +<p>Edward R. Ford has the following observation on the selection +of a nesting site:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>As in the case of the larger ground-nesting birds, whose nests have little +architectural pretension, the upland plover often deposits the first egg before +any nest-building operations have been begun. It is probable that the physiological +condition of the female urges her to seek a location generally favorable +to the successful rearing of a brood; but the exact site of the nest may be +in some measure accidental. It is not often that one may be fortunate enough +to come upon the kind of evidence best calculated to prove a theory of animal +behavior, but it happened once that we found a single egg of the upland plover, +unbetrayed by the presence of the parent and hidden deep in the grass. It +might have been an egg prematurely laid and, therefore, not likely to receive +further parental attention. If it had been a meadow lark’s egg, for example, +that would have been the conclusion and the facts of experience would have +borne it out. But here was the chance to test a theory and so, while not +surprised, we were gratified, three days later, to flush a bird from the spot +marked as the location of the single egg and to find there the full complement +of four. About these the dry grass had taken hemispherical form and, with +the addition of loose material and by reason of the impression made by the +eggs themselves, as well as by the body of the parent, there now existed a +well-defined if simple nest.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The upland plover lays four eggs, rarely five, and perhaps +sometimes only three. These are ovate to short ovate in shape, less +pointed than most shore birds’ eggs; and they have only a slight +gloss. In the commonest types the ground colors vary from “light +pinkish cinnamon” to “pale pinkish buff”; in others they vary +from “cartridge buff” or “pale olive buff” to greenish white. They +are more or less evenly spotted with small spots of various shades of +dark browns or reddish browns, and usually with small underlying +spots, rarely large blotches, of “ecru drab” or “pale drab gray.” +The measurements of 66 eggs in the United States National Museum +average 45 by 32.5 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes +measure <b>51</b> by 33, 48 by <b>35</b>, <b>41.5</b> by 32.5, and 48 by <b>29.5</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—The incubation period is said to be 17 days, but this needs +confirmation. Both sexes share in the duties of incubation and care +of the young. Katharine U. Hunter (1916) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The birds relieved each other at the nest—a true division of domestic cares: +one bird would alight at a long distance, fold his wings, utter no cry, and, +with head held low, walk through the grass, squatting lower and lower till +finally he disappeared on the nest; then the female would retreat with the +same caution, not spreading her wings till far from the eggs.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Doctor Coues (1874) describes the behavior of young birds and +their parents very well, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Young birds are abroad late in June—curious little creatures, timid and weak, +led about by their anxious parents, solicitous for their welfare, and ready to +engage in the most unequal contests in their behalf. When half grown, but +still in the down, the little creatures have a curious clumsy, top-heavy look; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</span>their legs look disproportionately large, like those of a young colt or calf; and +they may be caught with little difficulty, as they do not run very well. I once +happened upon a brood, perhaps two weeks old, rambling with their mother over +the prairie. She sounded the alarm, to scatter her brood, but not before I had +secured one of them in my hand. I never saw a braver defense attempted +than was made by this strong-hearted though powerless bird, who, after exhausting +her artifices to draw me in pursuit of herself, by tumbling about as if +desperately wounded, and lying panting with outstretched wings on the grass, +gave up hope of saving her young in this way, and then almost attacked me, +dashing close up and retreating again to renew her useless onslaught. She was +evidently incited to unusual courage by the sight of her little one struggling in +my hand. At this downy stage the young birds are white below, finely mottled +with black, white, and rich brown above; the feet and under mandible are +light colored; the upper mandible is blackish.</p> + +<p>Although these tattlers are generally dispersed over the prairies during the +summer, yet they affect particular spots by preference. Away from the river +valleys, such spots are the numerous depressions of rolling prairie, often of +great extent, which are moist or even watery at some seasons, and where the +vegetation is most luxuriant. Here they gather almost into colonies. Riding +into some such spot in July, when the young birds are being led about by their +parents, some old bird more watchful than the rest, or nearest to the person +approaching, gives the alarm with a loud outcry, the young scatter and hide, +and all the old birds are soon on wing; hovering in the air, often at a great +height, crossing each other’s path, and ceaselessly vociferating their displeasure. +I have often seen a dozen or twenty overhead at once, all from a little spot +only a few acres in extent. Later in the season, when all the summer’s broods +are on wing, they make up into flocks, often of great extent, and old and young +together assume the ordinary routine of their lives. They leave these northern +regions early. I saw none after the forepart of September.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—In the downy young upland plover, the crown, back, +and rump are prettily variegated, marbled, or mottled, with black, +“wood brown,” “pinkish buff,” and white, with no definite pattern. +The sides of the head and the entire under parts are pale buff or buffy +white, whitest on the belly and throat. A narrow, median frontal +stripe and a few spots on the sides of the head are black.</p> + +<p>The juvenal plumage is much like that of the summer adult, but it +is much more buffy, especially about the head and neck, which are +“cinnamon-buff” or “light ochraceous buff”; the crown is nearly +solid brownish black, or with only a narrow, median, buffy line; the +back and scapulars are brownish black with broad “cinnamon” edgings +and with little or no definite barring on the scapulars; the lesser +wing coverts are sepia with “cinnamon-buff” edgings, broader than +in the adult; and the median coverts are sepia, broadly tipped, and +notched with “cinnamon-buff” and with a subterminal spot or bar +of dark sepia. This plumage is partially molted in August and +September, producing the first winter plumage, which is like the +adult, except that the juvenal flight feathers and most of the wing +coverts are retained. At the first prenuptial molt young birds apparently +become indistinguishable from adults.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_61">[Pg 61]</span></p> + +<p>Adults have a complete postnuptial molt, beginning with the body +plumage in August and ending with the wings in December and +January. Their prenuptial molt in spring involves nearly everything +but the wings. The winter plumage is less buffy than the +spring, more grayish above and whiter below, with paler edgings, +but the color pattern is about the same.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The feeding habits of the upland plover are almost wholly +beneficial. It is one of our most useful birds; living, as it does, in +grass lands and cultivated fields, it destroys vast numbers of grasshoppers, +locusts, and other injurious insects. W. L. McAtee (1912) +writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>From its habits the upland plover would naturally be expected to have a +closer relation to agriculture than most sandpipers, and such proves to be the +case. Almost half its food is made up of grasshoppers, crickets, and weevils, +all of which exact heavy toll from cultivated crops. Among the weevils eaten +are the cottonboll weevil; greater and lesser clover-leaf weevils; clover-root +weevils; <i>Epicaerus imbricatus</i>, which is known to attack almost all garden +and orchard crops; cowpea curculios; <i>Tanymecus confertus</i>, an enemy of sugar +beets; <i>Thecesternus humeralis</i>, which has been known to injure grapevines; +and bill bugs. <i>Thecesternus</i> alone composes 3.65 per cent of the seasonal food +of the 163 stomachs examined, and bill bugs constitute 5.83 per cent. No fewer +than 8 species of bill bugs were identified from the stomachs. These weevils +injure, often seriously, such crops as corn, wheat, barley, and rye, as well as +forage plants of many kinds. The upland plover further makes itself useful to +the farmer by devouring leaf beetles, including the grapevine colaspis, southern +corn leaf-beetle, and other injurious species; wireworms and their adult forms, +the click beetles; white grubs and their parents, the May beetles; cutworms, +army worms; cotton worms; cotton cutworms; sawfly larvae; and leather-jackets +or cranefly larvae. They befriend cattle by eating horseflies and their +larvae, and cattle ticks. They eat a variety of other animal forms, such as +moths, ants, and other <i>Hymenoptera</i>, flies, bugs, centipedes and millipeds, spiders, +snails, and earthworms. Practically 97 per cent of the food consists of animal +matter, chiefly of injurious and neutral forms. The vegetable food comprises +the seeds of such weed pests as buttonweed, foxtail grass, and sand spurs, +and hence is also to the credit of the bird.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>J. M. Bates (1907) says that, in Nebraska, “after the wheat is cut, +and during migration, it frequents the wheat stubble and gorges +itself with the waste grain.” He has also seen it in the rye stubble in +Connecticut. But this does no harm, of course.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—When traveling the upland plover’s flight is swift and +strong, well sustained on its long, pointed wings; and when migrating, +by day or by night, it flies at a great height. In the autumn it is +wary and difficult to approach, as it jumps up at long range and flies +rapidly away for a long distance. But in the spring its flight is +quite different, more leisurely; it seems to drift along so high up in +the sky as to be almost invisible; it might pass unnoticed, were it +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</span>not for its flute like notes. Edwin Sandys (1904) has described this +very well, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This drifting flight is characteristic of the present species, and it usually +ends in a diving slant earthward, which is performed without any perceptible +motion of the wings. A few feet from the ground the long, beautiful, easy +descent is gently checked, and the bird alights as quietly as though it had +stooped only a yard or so instead of hundreds or thousands of feet. For a few +seconds after alighting the bird is apt to keep its wings considerably elevated +above its back, and the brief pose in this position is particularly attractive. +Then the airy fans are sedately furled. This pretty trick of keeping the wings +spread as if for a momentary study of how they should be correctly folded is +not peculiar to this species. Others of its near and remote kin go through the +same dainty evolution, although, perhaps, without the air of studied care +which is characteristic of Bartram’s sandpiper.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>On its breeding grounds its flight is different again; it often flies +along slowly and evenly, at a low elevation, 15 or 20 feet above the +ground, on quickly vibrating wings, pouring out its liquid, rolling +trills or flute like notes, a delightful performance; or when flushed +from its nest it flies off close to the ground with short, rapid strokes +of its down-curved wings, as if using only its wing tips, suggesting +the flight of the spotted sandpiper. On a windy day it may occasionally +be seen to soar or hover on quivering wings like a small +falcon.</p> + +<p>On the ground its movements are ploverlike, running swiftly and +stopping suddenly. It runs gracefully through the grass with its +long neck stretched up to watch the pursuer; or, crouching down, it +runs rapidly away and disappears in the grass. It alights frequently +on fences, telegraph poles, stumps, or rocks to watch the intruder and +scold at him. It is seldom seen near water, and I doubt if anyone has +ever seen it swimming. It is a gentle bird at all times and lives +harmoniously with its neighbors on its breeding grounds, but it does +not seem to associate with other species elsewhere.</p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—The voice of the upland plover is one of its greatest +charms; once heard in its perfection it will never be forgotten; and it +often serves to identify the species when the bird can not be seen. +W. H. Hudson (1922) has referred to it very attractively, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Lying awake in bed, I would listen by the hour to that sound coming to me +from the sky, mellowed and made beautiful by distance and the profound silence +of the moonlit world, until it acquired a fascination for me above all sounds on +earth, so that it lived ever after in me; and the image of it is as vivid in my +mind at this moment as that of any bird call or cry, or any other striking sound +heard yesterday or but an hour ago. It was the sense of mystery it conveyed +which so attracted and impressed me—the mystery of that delicate, frail, beautiful +being, traveling in the sky, alone, day and night, crying aloud at intervals +as if moved by some powerful emotion, beating the air with its wings, its beak +pointing like the needle of the compass to the north, flying, speeding on its +7,000-mile flight to its nesting home in another hemisphere.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</span></p> + +<p>The most beautiful and striking note heard on its breeding grounds +is a sweet, mellow, rolling trill, uttered as the bird flies along at a low +elevation or while perched on a fence post or even on the ground; it +is evidently a love note. Prof. Lynds Jones (1903) has described it +very well, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The rolling cry is not unlike the rolling call of a tree toad, but of a different +quality and caliber, which makes it unmistakable. The whistle is partly double, +the first part passing upward nearly half an octave, terminating abruptly there, +the second part beginning where the first began and rapidly swelling through +nearly or quite an octave, then gradually falling again and decreasing in volume +to the close, several tones above the beginning. The first part of the whistle is +usually rattling or trilled, and sometimes the trill is carried to the end, but +oftener it becomes a clear whistle before the culmination and continues clear to +the end. <i>Tre-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e, tre-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-p; or tr-r-r-r-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-p.</i> +Often the whistled part is never reached, but the call stops as if interrupted +by some threatened danger.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The alarm note, as the bird flies away from its nest or as it runs +about scolding at the intruder, is an emphatic and rapidly uttered <i>quip-ip-ip-ip</i>. +It also has a rich, musical note, which sounds like <i>qua-a-ily</i>, +from which one of its local names is taken. This and a modified +form of its rolling trill are often heard on migration, a prolonged, +mournful, mellow whistle, drifting down out of the sky, more like the +whistling of the wind than a bird’s voice.</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The upland plover should be easily recognized by its +size and shape; its slender, graceful form, its delicate head and neck, +and its long tail are characteristic. In flight its long, pointed wings, +its dark rump, and its barred, whitish, outer tail feathers are good +field marks. Its manner of flight and its notes are distinctive.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—About the middle of July, or even earlier, old and young +birds begin to gather into flocks, move off their breeding grounds, and +start on their fall migrations. The migratory flights are made mainly +during the night or early evening. At this season the birds are much +wilder, the leisurely behavior of spring and summer has gone, their +flight is much swifter and stronger, and it is difficult to approach the +loose, detached flocks which stop to feed during the day on the hoards +of grasshoppers and locusts which are then to be found in the upland +pastures and dry meadows. During wet spells they do not stop, but +in hot, dry weather they linger to feast on the abundant insect life +and become very fat. We used to expect them in Massachusetts about +the last of July, but they were most abundant in August and early +September. The general movement is southward, through the interior +and the Atlantic Coast States and through the West Indies +to South America. The earliest birds reach Louisiana and Texas +early in July and arrive in Peru and Argentina in September. The +last birds leave their breeding range before the end of September.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</span></p> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—The upland plover is, or was, a fine game bird. Over 40 +years ago, in my younger shooting days, these birds were still fairly +common in Massachusetts, but it was no easy job to make a fair day’s +bag; it meant tramping many miles over rolling, or hilly pasture +lands, where the wary birds rose at long range and flew swiftly away +for a long distance. One had to shoot quickly and accurately to kill +his bird, and perhaps chase one for several miles before getting even +a long shot at him. It was a real sporting proposition with the +chances much in the bird’s favor. The birds would not come to decoys, +nor to the gunner’s whistle and a dog was utterly useless except +to retrieve birds. A thorough knowledge of the ground and of the +birds’ fly-ways sometimes brought results, when we could hide behind +some fence or stone wall and wait for the birds to fly over. Even +meager results were well worth while, for we had plenty of good exercise +and the birds made delicious morsels for the table.</p> + +<p>A more common and more successful, though less sportsmanlike, +method of shooting them is thus described by Edwin Sandys (1904):</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A popular method in many parts of the West is to drive to the birds in a +buckboard, or other convenient rig. For a man who can shoot well in the sitting +posture this is an excellent plant, as the birds almost invariably will permit a +wheeled conveyance to approach within comparatively easy range. A clever +driver is a valuable assistance. Such a man never heads his team directly at +the birds, but drives as though he merely intended to pass them by. A good +judge of distance in the open can in this way edge within comfortable range of +plover which, if the driver steered straight for them, or with the gun attempted +to dismount and stalk, would at once make off. I have varied the shooting from +the seat by walking at the horse’s shoulders. The plover do not appear to notice +the extra pair of legs. This sometimes gives the prettiest kind of shooting. All +one has to do is to judge when sufficiently close, then stand still with the gun +at the ready, while the team moves steadily ahead. Usually the plover will +take wing the moment the foot-man is uncovered; but should they not, the man +can gain a few yards by briskly walking toward them. I have occasionally +stalked them by keeping close to the shoulder of a steady old horse that was +indifferent in the matters of smoke and loud reports.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Edward H. Forbush (1912) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>About 1880, when the supply of passenger pigeons began to fail, and the marketmen, +looking about for some other game for the table of the epicure in spring +and summer, called for plover, the destruction of the upland plover began in +earnest. The price increased. In the spring migration the birds were met by +a horde of market gunners, shot, packed in barrels and shipped to the cities. +There are tales of special refrigerator cars sent out to the prairie regions, and +parties of gunners regularly employed to follow the birds and ship plover and +curlews by the carload to the Chicago market. These may not be based on facts, +but we know that the birds came to market in great quantities.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—The upland plover spends our winter months on the +pampas of Argentina and Patagonia, where unfortunately it is more +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</span>sought for by market hunters than it is here. Mr. Hudson (1920) +writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This species differs from its fellow-migrants of the same family from the +north to Argentina in its wide and even distribution over all that portion of the +pampas where the native coarse grasses which once covered the country have +disappeared, an area comprising not less than 50,000 square miles. It begins +to arrive as early as September, coming singly or in small parties of three or +four; and, extraordinary as the fact may seem when we consider the long distance +the bird travels, and the monotonous nature of the level country it uses +as a “feeding area,” it is probable that every bird returns to the same spot +year after year; for in no other way could such a distribution be maintained, +and the birds appear every summer evenly sprinkled over so immense a surface.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Doctor Wetmore (1926) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Formerly abundant, the upland plover is now rare in the region where it +spends the period of northern winter. Its winter range on the open pampa +is a region so vast that it is difficult to form a proper estimate of the actual +number of individuals of the species that remain. Among epicures the species +has inherited in part the name and reputation of the Eskimo curlew and is +sought constantly by gunners to supply that demand. The few that survive +frequent remote regions on some of the large estancias where they are secure +until they leave their seclusion and begin their return flight northward. The +majority of those that I noted were identified by their liquid calls, heard, as +is the case in Washington, as they passed at night.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>He says again (1927):</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In the season of 1919–20 the upland plover was reported to have increased +somewhat in abundance at Rosas in the Province of Buenos Aires, a circumstance +due perhaps to protection in the United States and Canada. It can +hardly be expected to regain anywhere near its former abundance, however, +with increasing encroachment on its winter and summer ranges. Unfortunately, +in Argentina it has replaced the Eskimo curlew as a table delicacy, and is so +eagerly sought by gunners that its preservation in settled regions is doubtful. +Those that remain must seek the pastures of remote estancias in order to +survive.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North and South America; accidental in Europe.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The breeding range of the upland plover extends +north to Alaska (Kobuk River and Gens de Large Mountains); +southern Mackenzie (probably Fort Smith); Saskatchewan (Prince +Albert, Quill Lake, and Crescent Lake); Manitoba (Shoal Lake and +Winnipeg); Minnesota (Clarissa, St. Cloud, Minneapolis, and Lake +City); Wisconsin (Kingston and Kelley Brook); Michigan (Lovells +and Zion City); Ontario (probably Plover Mills, Dunnville, and +Kingston); northern New York (Canton and Potsdam); southern +Quebec (Hatley); and Maine (Farmington, Plymouth, Orono, and +Calais). East to Maine (Calais); Massachusetts (Salem, Marthas +Vineyard, and Nantucket); probably Connecticut (South Windsor); +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</span>New York (Montauk Point); New Jersey (Princeton, Lawrenceville, +and probably Tuckerton); Virginia (Wallops Island); and rarely +South Carolina (Oakland). South to rarely South Carolina (Oakland); +southern Indiana (Bicknell); Illinois (Olney and Odin); +Missouri (Appleton and probably Stotesbury); Oklahoma (Copan +and Fort Reno); probably Texas (Gainesville); Colorado (Barr +and Denver); Utah (Kamas Prairies); and Oregon (Fort Klamath). +West to Oregon (Fort Klamath); northern Idaho (Lapwai and +Fort Sherman); British Columbia (Newgate and Osoyoos Lake); +probably Alberta (Edmonton and Athabaska Landing); and Alaska +(Mount McKinley and Kobuk River).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The main winter range of the species is confined +to the southern part of South America, north to northern Argentina +(Tucuman); and southern Brazil (Irisanga and probably Mattodentro). +East to southern Brazil (probably Mattodentro); Uruguay +(Concepcion, Sta. Elena, and Colonia); and eastern Argentina +(Buenos Aires and Rio Negro). South to Argentina (Rio Negro). +West to Argentina (Rio Negro, Mendoza, and Tucuman). A specimen +was taken at San Angelo, Tex., January 1, 1883, but this must +be considered as an accidental occurrence as the species at this season +is usually found only in southern South America.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: Ecuador, +Chaupicuz, March 30; Chiapas, Comitan, March 29; Florida, Indian +Key, March 17, St. Marks, March 23, Deer Park, March 24, and Leon +County, March 25; Alabama, Barachias, March 7, Coosada, March +22, and Sand Mountain, March 29; Georgia, Macon, March 18, and +Savannah, March 23; South Carolina, Mount Pleasant, March 11, +and Frogmore, March 24; North Carolina, Raleigh, March 28; Virginia, +Alexandria, March 22; District of Columbia, Washington, +March 21; Pennsylvania, Marietta, March 27, Plymouth, April 10, and +Erie, April 11; New Jersey, Haddonfield, April 7, and Cape May, +April 12; New York, Long Island, April 1, Watertown, April 6, and +Amagansett, April 11; Connecticut, Jewett City, April 16, and Saybrook, +April 22; Rhode Island, Newport, April 29; Massachusetts, +Woods Hole, April 10, Salem, April 12, and Cape Cod, April 12; Vermont, +Woodstock, April 17, Bennington, April 22, and Rutland, +April 26; Maine, Pittsfield, April 14, Plymouth, April 25, and Portland, +April 30; Louisiana, New Orleans, March 9, Hester, March 16, +and Lobdell, March 19; Mississippi, Biloxi, March 10, and Rodney, +March 27; Tennessee, Nashville, March 31; Kentucky, Guthrie, March +20; Missouri, St. Louis, March 17, Appleton City, March 19, and Kahoka, +March 20; Illinois, Rockford, March 19, Lebanon, March 20, and +Canton, March 27; Indiana, Bicknell, March 13, Vigo County, March +19, and Vincennes, April 1; Ohio, Oberlin, March 20, Berlin Center, +March 23, and Columbus, March 29; Michigan, Ann Arbor, March +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</span>15, Plymouth, April 8, and Livonia, April 12; Ontario, Forest, April +16, London, April 17 and Preston, April 18; Iowa, Storm Lake, +March 25, Wall Lake, March 30, and Hillsboro, March 31; Wisconsin, +Delavan, March 24, Milford, April 10, and Stoughton, April 11; Minnesota, +Lanesboro, April 8, North Star, April 9, and St. Cloud, April +16; Texas, Bonham, March 5, Mont Belvieu, March 8, Dallas, March +10, and Corpus Christi, March 13; Oklahoma, Copan, March 31; +Kansas, Girard, March 16, Richmond, March 28, Topeka, April 1, +and Onaga, April 7; Nebraska, Falls City, April 6, Badger, April +7 and Syracuse, April 9; South Dakota, Vermilion, April 9, Grand +View, April 14, and Rapid City, April 15; North Dakota, Argusville, +April 26, Larimore, April 26, and Marstonmoor, April 30; Manitoba, +Aweme, April 26, Reaburn, April 30, Winnipeg, May 2, and Two +Rivers, May 3; Saskatchewan, South qu’Appelle, April 16, Wiseton, +April 25, and Indian Head, May 2; Colorado, Denver, April 18, and +Colorado Springs, April 28; Wyoming, Lake Como, May 5; Montana, +Billings, April 23, Columbia Falls, April 27, and Terry, May +10; Alberta, Flagstaff, May 2, Alliance, May 7, and Red Deer, May +11; and British Columbia, Osoyoos Lake, May 25.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Argentina, Buenos Aires, +April 3, Tucuman, April 5, and Baradero, April 13; Bolivia, Piedra +Blanca, April 23; Brazil, Tonantino, May 7; Guatemala, Duenas, +April 12; Mexico, Chiapas, Teopisca, May 7; Yucatan, Cancun Island, +April 19; Vera Cruz, Lake Catemaco, May 5; Florida, Garden Key, +May 2, Loggerhead Key, May 7, and Pensacola, May 9; Georgia, +Savannah, April 28; Louisiana, Lobdell, May 15, and New Orleans, +May 19; Mississippi, Biloxi, May 16; and Texas, Brownsville, April +15, Bonham, May 12, and Huntsville, May 18.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of fall arrival are: New Mexico, +Glenrio, July 25; Texas, San Angelo, July 4, and Lipscomb, July 10; +Louisiana, New Orleans, July 5, and Abbeville, July 25; Alabama, +Montgomery, July 28, and Barachias, August 22; Florida, Pensacola, +August 9, and Arcadia, August 22; the Bahama Islands, Mariguana, +August 5; the Lesser Antilles, Barbados, August 12, and Granada, +August 24; Mexico, Jalisco, Chapata, August 27; Costa Rica, September +5; Panama, Gatun, September 1; Colombia, Cienaga, September +12; Ecuador, Carapungo, August 10, and Cerro Campania, September +24; Brazil, Matto Grosso, September 26; Paraguay, Puerto +Pinasco, September 29, and Concepcion, October 3.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Alberta, Red Deer River, September +22; Montana, Big Sandy, September 6; Wyoming, Little Medicine, +August 15; Colorado, Fort Lyon, September 2; New Mexico, +Glenrio, September 11; Manitoba, Treesbank, September 7, Margaret, +September 18, and Aweme, September 28; North Dakota, +Marstonmoor, September 15, and Westhope, September 24; South +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_68">[Pg 68]</span>Dakota, Huron, September 2, Sioux Falls, September 6, and Forestburg, +September 30; Nebraska, Dewitt, September 21, Badger, September +28, and Valentine, October 5; Kansas, near Wichita, October +3, Topeka, October 13, and Onaga, October 15; Texas, Grapevine, +September 25, Gainesville, September 28, and Corpus Christi, +October 2; Minnesota, Lanesboro, August 22, and St. Vincent, August +31; Iowa, Emmetsburg, October 14, Newton, October 22, and +Grinnell, November 2; Michigan, Livonia, September 18, and Detroit, +October 20; Ohio, Lakeside, October 13, Scio, October 17, and +Waverly, October 23; Illinois, La Grange, October 5, Belvidere, +October 24, and Rantoul, November 29; Missouri, Monteer, September +17, and Jasper City, September 27; Kentucky, Lexington, October +11; Louisiana, New Orleans, October 7; Maine, Pittsfield, September +22; Vermont, St. Johnsbury, September 25; Massachusetts, Harvard, +September 14, Taunton, September 19, and Woods Hole, September +29; Rhode Island, Block Island, September 6; Connecticut, Hartford, +September 3, and Litchfield, September 6; New York, Phelps, +September 14, Montauk, September 17, Orient Point, September 23, +and Floral Park, October 20; New Jersey, Absalom Light, September +15; Pennsylvania, Erie, September 22, Germantown, October 2, and +Bridesburg, October 18; Virginia, Alexandria, November 5; North +Carolina, Weaverville, November 10; South Carolina, Mt. Pleasant, +October 28; Georgia, Savannah, September 20; Alabama, Barachias, +October 26; Florida, Key West, October 3; Costa Rica, San Jose, +November 15; Nicaragua, Escondido River, November 26; Panama, +Culebra, October 22, and Davila, November 30 and Gatun, December +8; Guiana, Cayenne, October 27; Peru, Cosnipata, October 3; and +Brazil, Allianca, November 9.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—A specimen of the upland plover taken February +8, 1923 at Deception Island, South Shetlands, must be considered +accidental, as this is far south of its normal winter range (Bennett, +1926). The species has been reported as occasional in spring in +Newfoundland (Macoun) and one was obtained on Sable Island +in 1868 (Gilpin). There are several records for Quebec (Montreal +and Godbout) from May 7 to October. Two have been taken in +Bermuda (September 20, 1874, and September 18, 1875). In Porto +Rico one was obtained by Stahl between 1878 and 1881 (Gundlach); +F. A. Potts reports that he saw one September 10, 1921 near Central +Aguirre, collected one from a flock of 15 on September 13, 1921, near +Santa Isabel, and saw still another August 26, 1926 near Fortuna. +On the Pacific coast south of British Columbia, it is known from a +specimen taken August 8, 1896, at Tule Lake, California, and one +taken at Sulphur Springs, Arizona, August 18, 1874.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</span></p> + +<p>There are six records for England, Warwick, October 31, 1851, +Cambridge, December 12, 1854, Bigswear, January 19, 1855, Falmouth +November 13, 1865, Boulmer, November 21, 1879 and the +Parret River in Somersetshire (date ?); one for Denmark Tim, +November 3, 1920; one for Malta, November 17, 1865; one for Holland +(Meyer); one for Germany, Hessen (Naumann); and one for +Italy, Liguria, October, 1859. It also was taken near Sydney, +Australia, in 1865 (Gould).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—New England and New York: 10 records, April 28 to +June 13. Pennsylvania and New Jersey: 15 records, May 6 to June +11; 8 records, May 15 to 27. Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Dakotas, and +Minnesota: 86 records, May 4 to July 1; 43 records, June 1 to 15. +Ohio to Iowa and Kansas: 22 records, April 30 to June 17; 11 +records, May 14 to 20.</p> + +<div class="chapter" id="Buff"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">TRYNGITES SUBRUFICOLLIS</span> <span class="smaller">(Vieillot)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">BUFF-BREASTED SANDPIPER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>My acquaintance with this species is limited to a few birds seen +migrating in company with golden plover on the burnt-over prairies +about Quill Lake, Saskatchewan. I have never seen it elsewhere. +Like the upland plover, it is a sandpiper which has associated much +with plover, frequents similar haunts, and has acquired some similar +habits.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—W. H. Hudson (1922) gives a striking account of the +spring migration of this species in Argentina during its former +abundance, from which I quote, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Now, one autumn, when most of the emigrants to the Arctic breeding grounds +had already gone, I witnessed a great migration of this very species—this +beautiful sandpiper with the habits of a plover. The birds appeared in flocks +of about one to two or three hundred, flying low and very swiftly due north, +flock succeeding flock at intervals of about 10 or 12 minutes; and this migration +continued for three days, or at all events three days from the first day +I saw them, at a spot about 2 miles from my home. I was amazed at their +numbers, and it was a puzzle to me then, and has been one ever since, that a +species thinly distributed over the immense area of the Argentine pampas and +Patagonia could keep to that one line of travel over that uniform green, sea-like +country. For outside of that line not one bird of the kind could anywhere +be seen; yet they kept so strictly to it that I sat each day for hours on my +horse watching them pass, each flock first appearing as a faint buff-colored +blur or cloud just above the southern horizon, rapidly approaching then passing +me, about on a level with my horse’s head, to fade out of sight in a couple of +minutes in the north; soon to be succeeded by another and yet other flocks +in endless succession, each appearing at the same point as the one before, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</span>following the same line, as if a line invisible to all eyes except their own had +been traced across the green world for their guidance. It gave one the idea +that all the birds of this species, thinly distributed over tens of thousands +of square miles of country, had formed the habit of assembling previous to +migration at one starting point, from which they set out in successive flocks +of a medium size in a disciplined order on that marvelous journey to their +Arctic breeding grounds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Dr. Alexander Wetmore (1926) noted migrating birds at Guamini +on March 3 to 8. Prof. W. W. Cooke (1912) says that “migrants +appear in the interior of Brazil and in Peru during March, +but there are no spring migration data for the whole distance +between Peru and Texas.” There is a heavy migration through +Texas during April and then directly northward through the western +part of the Mississippi Valley and the prairie Provinces of Canada +to the Arctic tundra. The whole migration route in the spring seems +to be very narrow. Prof. William Rowan (1927) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This is a remarkable sandpiper from many viewpoints. Like the American +golden plover and the Eskimo curlew it used to exist in millions and was +slaughtered in uncountable numbers. To-day there are many widely traveled +collectors who have never in their lives met with it. After extensive inquiries +I can discover only one spot on the continent besides our point on which +migrating buff-breasted sandpipers may be relied upon to turn up in any +numbers. We get it in hundreds every spring, and, roughly speaking, it +frequents only one field. Odd birds or moving flocks may be noted elsewhere +from time to time, but on the rough pasture that forms the main body of the +point this species arrives with unfailing regularity within a day or two of +the 18th of May. Like the golden plover, it seems to migrate by night, for +at daybreak there may be hundreds in place of the few or none at all of the +previous evening.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In his notes for 1924 he writes to me:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Two birds were seen May 19 and subsequently collected. On the 21st, five +were seen shortly after sunrise with black-bellied plover, the first time that I +have seen this association, but a large arrival took place during the day +and there were scores in the evening. On the 24th they had reached numbers +such as I have never before seen and numerous photographs were taken. On +the 26th they must have been on the ground in many hundreds. The whole +of their area, over a mile long, was crawling with them. There is no doubt +that this year they outnumbered every other wader we had on the place. +Even so, they never formed large flocks, and I think we never saw more than +60 get up and fly together. They dropped very suddenly in numbers after this, +as though they had all cleared off together, but a few were seen each day till +the 30th, when a flock of 30 constituted our last record.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Pierce Brodkorb and Frank Grasett have recorded it in northeastern +Illinois as early as April 27. A. G. Lawrence’s dates for +Whitewater Lake, Manitoba, are from May 13 to 19. Dr. E. W. +Nelson (1887) noted the first arrivals at St. Michael, Alaska, on +May 31; and John Murdoch (1885) says that it arrived at Point +Barrow June 6 to 8.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</span></p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—Professor Rowan (1927) has given us the most elaborate +account of the nuptial display of the buff-breasted sandpiper, +as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>As we have noted it annually, there are several distinct stages to the display, +but the males do not appear to be concerned in the least with the females at +any time. Nor have I ever seen a female take the slightest notice of any of +the displays. Nelson comments on the fact that Murdoch frequently saw +solitary males displaying, yet he was observing them on the actual breeding +grounds.</p> + +<p>Probably the most frequent performance is the raising of one wing only +(either one), but this has various phases. A, the wing is spread and held +steadily for a few moments with the primaries horizontal and is then closed +again. B, the wing is spread with the primaries nearly perpendicular and +waved round in an ellipse, the bird standing still. C, the wing is spread while +the bird runs round in circles. D, the wing is held aloft while the owner runs +after another bird, always, so far as I have seen, another male, which instantly +raises one wing also and starts zigzagging through the grass, the first bird +giving chase. They may thus cover many yards before one suddenly collapses +his wing and halts, the second immediately following suit. All these single-wing +performances seem to be carried out in silence.</p> + +<p>Both wings together are used for another set of actions. E, the wings are +raised similarly to a bird alighting on or arising from the ground, the body +horizontal. In this attitude one bird sometimes chases another. F is a double +version of B, both wings being raised high and waved round and round. +G, both wings are spread, undersurfaces forward, primaries horizontal, after +the manner of the American eagle, the body being almost perpendicular. This +may be accomplished by a rapid <i>tick tick tick</i> many times repeated. Two birds +may do it simultaneously standing opposite to each other with the tips of the +wings practically touching. H is the most characteristic of all and the most +amusing to watch. Both wings are raised with the undersurfaces facing to +the front as in G, but with the primaries perpendicular, tips practically touching +each other over the bird’s head. The body is held absolutely vertical and +the legs stretched to capacity (I am not sure that the birds do not stand +partially on tiptoe), tail cocked out horizontally behind, while the individual +“<i>ticks</i>” at top speed for about a second. Each “<i>tick</i>” is accompanied with +a rapid jerk of the whole body. The bird then relaxes momentarily, turns +through an angle of 40 to 50 degrees, repeats the performance to a fresh audience +(if there is one, for I have seen isolated birds doing this), relaxes to +switch round again, and so on perhaps half a dozen times. This may also be +done simultaneously by two birds, face to face, and standing so close that the +wing tips appear to touch over their heads. It may then be repeated without +any change of direction in the intervals. But it always seems to be done in +spasms. Display is evidently infectious, particularly in fine weather, for no +sooner does one start than a dozen may be at it in a moment. But it is curious +to see a bird suddenly stop in its hunt for food in order to go through one of +these acts and then proceed as though it never had anything else in mind, +particularly if it is by itself. It seems so irrational. Occasional bickering occurs, +but we have never seen serious fights or even suggestion of anything serious.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Murdoch (1885) has also observed that—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Two will occasionally meet and spar like fighting cocks for a few minutes +and then rise together like towering birds, with legs hanging loose, for about 30 +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</span>feet, then drifting off to leeward. A single bird will sometimes stretch himself +up to his full height, spread his wings forward, and puff out his throat, making +a sort of clucking noise, while one or two others stand by and apparently +admire him.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Roderick MacFarlane found the buff-breasted sandpiper +breeding commonly on the barren grounds east of Horton River and +on the Arctic coast. I find the records of some 25 nests in his notes, +but the data given are very meager. One nest was “near a small +river, made of a few dead leaves”; another was “a depression in the +ground, lined with a few withered grasses and leaves, on the slope of +a gentle eminence”; a third, he said, was “precisely similar to that +of the golden plover. The female made a short, low flight to a distance +of about 12 yards, when the nest was approached within 9 or +10 feet.”</p> + +<p>Murdoch (1885), at Point Barrow, “collected the eggs in considerable +abundance”; he says that “they were never seen on the +lower marshy portions of the tundra, but always confined themselves +to the high and dry banks, or what we call the black tundra.” The +eggs were deposited “in a shallow depression in the ground lined +with a little moss,” where they harmonized very well with the black +and white of the ground and moss.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The buff-breasted sandpiper lays four eggs; one set of +five is recorded. The shapes vary from ovate pyriform to pyriform, +usually decidedly pointed. The prevailing ground colors are very +light, from “cartridge buff” to dull white; in some darker colored +eggs they are “olive-buff,” “chamois,” or “cream buff.” They are +heavily and boldly marked, chiefly at the large end, where the markings +are often confluent, with longitudinal and somewhat spiral +blotches and with small spots and blotches scattered over the whole +egg. An occasional egg is only sparingly marked with small spots. +The markings are in dark browns, “bister,” “sepia,” “liver brown” +and “livid brown,” sometimes “Saccardo’s umber” or “chestnut +brown.” There are usually underlying blotches and spots in various +shades of “brownish drab” or “drab-gray.” The measurements of +62 eggs in the United States National Museum average 37 by 26 +millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measures <b>40</b> by 27, +37.5 by <b>27.5</b>, <b>34.5</b> by 25.5, and 35.5 by <b>25</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—I have never seen a downy young buff-breasted sandpiper +and I doubt if any one else has. Young birds are in juvenal +plumage when they migrate southward. They are like the adults, except +as follows: The feathers of the mantle are sepia with an olive +tinge, “dark grayish olive,” narrowly edged with cream white, giving +a scaled appearance, whereas in the adult these feathers are brownish +black or black, with very broad edgings of “cinnamon-buff” or +“pinkish buff”; the feathers of the lower back, rump and upper tail +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</span>coverts are from “hair brown” to “fuscous,” tipped with “cinnamon,” +whereas in the adult these are brownish black, broadly edged +with “cinnamon-buff”; the inner webs of the primaries, on the +under side, are much more finely and closely sprinkled with black +than in the adult, which has larger, more widely scattered and hence +more conspicuous black spots. This last character probably persists +through the first year. The postjuvenal molt and the first prenuptial +molt are accomplished in South America. I have seen no +specimens illustrating these.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete molt, apparently late in the fall or in the +winter, the wings being molted last. Doctor Wetmore (1926) shot +a male on September 21 that was still in worn breeding plumage. +Birds molting primaries have been taken in February and March. +Summer and winter plumages are very similar and the sexes are +alike, except that the female is much smaller than the male.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Professor Rowan (1927) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I am indebted to the Biological Survey at Washington for kindly analyzing +the contents of 17 stomachs, spring taken. Roughly, 40 per cent consisted +of Coleoptera, adults and larvae, and 50 per cent of Diptera, chiefly larvae +and pupae. Seeds of <i>Polygonum</i>, <i>Potamogeton</i>, and <i>Eleocharis</i> were present +to the extent of 1 per cent. The rest consisted of spider and insect remains. +I shall be glad to send a detailed list to anyone who may be interested.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The same observer writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The buff-breasted sandpiper, like Bartram’s, is a plover in its ways and +habits rather than a sandpiper. Even in its coloration it differs radically +from the common sandpipers. It is extraordinarily tame and confiding at +times. When the mood seizes it, one could without difficulty wipe out every +bird of a flock, provided one killed or wounded one with the first shot. The +remainder will return again and again to a wounded bird. The noise of the +gun seems to have little more than momentary effect.</p> + +<p>Owing to the muddy tone of their plumage, these birds are exceptionally +difficult to see on the type of ground that they so habitually frequent. One +can easily walk into a flock without knowing it till the birds get up almost +under foot. This is made the easier by their habit of “freezing.” They stand +immobile on being approached, not necessarily crouching, generally the very +reverse, but without movement they readily enough escape observation. If +they start moving as one gets nearer, it is always on the run. They then +carry their necks “craned,” scatter widely, and zig-zag hither and thither +rather after the manner of partridges, of which they frequently remind one.</p> + +<p>A flock will seldom rise in unison, but the nearer birds will merely fly over +and settle on the remote side of the further ones. Even when the buff-breasts +are amongst sandpipers, such as Baird’s, Semi-palmateds, etc., five times out +of ten they will remain on the spot if the others are scared up. A really large +flock is rare. We estimated the number of buff-breasts on a few acres of +grass one morning at about 2,000, and we spent several hours in trying to +photograph them. They were scattered in clumps in all directions. Although +we walked through them from one end to the other more than once, thus +tending to herd them, the largest number we were able to put up together +was about 150. This constitutes the largest flock we have ever seen. The +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</span>typical loose association is evident in the photograph. The birds merely flew +round and settled again in the vicinity.</p> + +<p>On windy days these, like other waders, become exceedingly restless and +impossible to approach. They then perform the most remarkable gyrations, +always but a few feet above the ground, and seldom rising and falling vertically, +as do so many others. They attain great speed and keep in close +formation, moving in absolute unison. As such a flock turns in the sunlight +there can be no possible error as to identity, for the whole mass looks yellowish. +A single bird, in favorable light, may also give one the impression +of being yellow.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>George H. Mackay (1892<i>a</i>) says of their habits in Massachusetts:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Of the few which I have seen I have remarked their extreme gentleness and +desire to be in company with other birds. On one occasion I had one alight +among my plover decoys on the upland (which they seem very fond of frequenting), +and, not wishing to shoot it, I allowed it to remain for quite a +while so I could watch it. During this time it moved about with unconcern, +apparently not being aware that its supposed companions were of wood. It +seemed so gentle that I determined to see how near it would permit me to +approach, and it was not over 5 or 6 feet from me when it flew away, but +only for a short time, however, for it returned and alighted in the course of +10 or 15 minutes. Having no desire to shoot it, I allowed it to remain until +it departed not to return. All the birds that I have seen come immediately +to the decoys on perceiving them, and alight without hesitation or fear. Their +flight is rapid, with many turns and zigzag movements, and near the ground, +constantly turning up so as to show their entire under parts.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Much of the behavior of the buff-breasted sandpiper, while on the +ground, reminds one of the upland plover; it seems to prefer the +grassy places rather than the open flats or shores, and often runs +away to hide in the grass rather than fly; in running it lifts its feet +rather high, as if accustomed to walking through grass; and it often +stops and stands with its neck stretched up looking at the intruder, +just as the upland plover does.</p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—It is not a noisy bird, and seems to have a limited vocabulary. +Professor Rowan (1926) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The spring note of the buff-breast, on the other hand, is the most unusual +and diagnostic wader note that I know. The only thing it reminds me of is +the song of the short-billed marsh wren (<i>Cistothorus stellaris</i>), which produces +a very excellent imitation of two stones being chipped together. The note +of the buff-breast has the same quality about it; but, instead of being loud +and clear, it is quiet and very short, and might be described as <i>tik</i>. This +species, however, is rather silent. I call this the spring note, but perhaps it +should more correctly be termed the adult note, for we have not a single good +record of an adult in the autumn, wherefore I am only familiar with young +at this season. Like some other waders (e. g. willet), birds of the year have +a very different call or calls from spring adults. In the case of the buff-breast +the note of the young is so like the pectoral’s—Harold considers it shorter and +less harsh—that, although distinguishable in the field, it can hardly be described +adequately by itself.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Doctor Wetmore (1926) writes: “As they rise they may give a low +call that resembles <i>chwup</i>, somewhat robinlike in tone; a second +call note is a low trilled <i>pr-r-r-reet</i>. The species is to be confused +in the field with no other shore bird.”</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—Professor Rowan (1927) says, on this point:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The absence of white margins and black center to the rump, and hence the +lack of contrast in this region, I have found to be the most useful diagnostic +character in the field. The wing patch is also valuable. The extraordinarily +rounded head seen in silhouette against the sun or in bad light at reasonable +range has more than once proved useful. The note is always diagnostic.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Doctor Wetmore (1926) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When in the air or on the ground they are distinctly buff in color, with a +glimpse of the marbled underwing surface as they rise or pass, and a flash +of the gray tail with its darker markings as they alight. On the ground in +profile, they show a long neck and long legs, while the short bill is suggestive +of that of a pigeon. The neck is drawn in during flight.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>E. A. Doolittle (1923) observed that—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The greenish legs, finely streaked crown, buffy breast and sides of head, lack +of streak through eyes, and long pointed wings reaching beyond tail were all +good field marks while the bird was at rest; while lack of wing bars and +rounded tail were striking when the bird took flight.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The fall migration is much more widely extended than the +spring; the main flight is directly southward through the center of +North America, but it is so spread out that some birds appear on +both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. Professor Cooke (1912) says: +“The main body of migrants follows the Barren Grounds to the +shores of Hudson Bay, thence almost due south across the Mississippi +Valley to the coast of Texas, and through Central America to northwestern +South America, and diagonally across the interior of South +America to Argentina.” A limited flight swings eastward, south +of Hudson Bay, or perhaps across it, to the eastern Provinces of +Canada and New England. The species is so rare on the Atlantic +coast south of Long Island as to indicate the probability of an oversea +flight to the West Indies and South America. On the Pacific +coast it seems to be very rare, though perhaps it has been overlooked, +south of Washington, where it is probably of regular occurrence. +D. E. Brown has sent me several records for Washington, +the dates ranging from September 3 to 20. Major Allan +Brooks (1924) says that he has noted it every year that he has been +on the British Columbia coast.</p> + +<p>In the interior the adults come along during the last three weeks +in August, and the young birds all through September. In New +England the dates are about the same. Here they were occasionally +seen in small flocks, but now they are so rare that single birds +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</span>are more often seen in company with upland or golden plover on +the rolling uplands, or with other sandpipers on the meadows.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—It evidently spends the winter south of Argentina, for +Doctor Wetmore (1926) saw the first one on September 21 in Paraguay +and the last one on November 13 near Buenos Aires; he did +not see it again until the return flight in March. Mr. Hudson (1920) +says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>It begins to arrive, usually in small bodies, early in the month of October; +and during the summer is seldom met with in flocks of any size on the pampas, +but is usually seen on the dry, open ground associating in small numbers +with the golden plover, the whimbrel, and other northern species. I, however, +think it probable that it travels farther south than its fellow-migrants from +North America, and has its principal feeding-grounds somewhere in the interior +of Patagonia; also that its northern journey takes place later than that of +other species.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Doctor Wetmore (1927) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The species frequented open flats or muddy shores near lakes or channels, +where it was subject to considerable hunting, as several of those seen had been +crippled by shooting. From observations at Guamini, it appeared that the +species has some resting station in northern Patagonia, perhaps near the +mouths of the Rio Colorado and the Rio Negro, or some of the large alkaline +lakes of that region. The small numbers remaining are preserved in some +such place, but apparently the species is near extinction.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North and South America.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The buff-breasted sandpiper is known to breed +only on the Arctic coast of northwestern North America from +Alaska (Cape Smythe, Point Barrow, and probably Cape Halkett); +east to Yukon (Herschell Island); and Mackenzie (Fort Anderson +and Bernard Harbor). It has been detected in summer and may +breed at Nulato and Fort Egbert, Alaska, and at Winter Harbor, +Franklin (Hennessey), while it also has been noted at this season in +eastern Siberia (Cape Wankarem and the south coast of the Okhotsk +Sea).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range appears to be restricted to +southern South America. They have been noted at this season in +Uruguay (Montevideo); and Argentina (Cordoba, Missiones, Rio +Parana, Buenos Aires, and Lavalle).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—The spring migration of the buff-breasted +sandpiper is imperfectly known, and only a few records are available. +It has been detected at Guamini, Argentina, on March 8, at Paramba, +Ecuador, on April 22, and at Gatun, Panama, on March 29. On the +Atlantic coast of the United States it is practically unknown at this +season, old records at Frogmore, South Carolina (May 5), and Kendall +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</span>(April 20), and Howard (May 8), New York, constituting the +meager data at hand.</p> + +<p>The main flight is seemingly up the Mississippi Valley, but even +in that region, the record is incomplete. The data available are: +Louisiana, Bird Islands, May 18; Kentucky, Bowling Green, April +27; Missouri, April 15, and May 20; Illinois, Chicago, April 27; +Ohio, Columbus, May 6, 1923 (only record); Iowa, Norway, April; +Minnesota, Madison, May 16, and Wilder, May 21; Texas, Corpus +Christi, March 17, and Gainesville, April 23; South Dakota, Sioux +Falls, May 12, and Fort Sisseton, May 22; North Dakota, Jamestown, +May 6, and Harrisburg, May 7; Mackenzie, Fort Chipewyan, +May 24, and Fort Simpson, May 29; and Alaska, Demarcation Point, +May 26.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—The fall record is more complete and dates of +arrival and departure can be given with greater consistency. Early +dates of arrival are: British Columbia, Chilliwack, July 23; Keewatin, +Cape Eskimo, August 10; Manitoba, Shoal Lake, August 9; +North Dakota, Grafton, August 14; South Dakota, Harding County, +August 15; Nebraska, Neligh, August 12, and Waverly, August 14; +Texas, Tivoli, August 3; Gainesville, August 4, and Brownsville, +August 4; Minnesota, Minneapolis, August 1; Iowa, Charles City, +August 1, and Sioux City, August 2; Indiana, Millers, August 30; +Ohio, Lake County, August 19; Illinois, Chicago, August 16; +Louisiana, Abbeville, August 4; Quebec, Godbout, August 7, and +Henley Harbor, August 20; Maine, Scarboro, August 1, and Damariscane +Island, August 26; New Hampshire, Rye Beach, August 25; +Massachusetts, Ipswich, August 7, Cape Cod, August 16, and Nantucket, +August 26; Rhode Island, Little Compton, July 22; New +York, Canandaigua, July 24, Shelter Island, August 22, Syracuse, +August 24, Rockaway, August 25, and Montauk Point, August 26; +New Jersey, Toms River, September 8; Virginia, Wallops Island, +September 5; North Carolina, Currituck, September 12; Florida, +Lake Jackson, September 12; Costa Rica, San Jose, September 7; +Colombia, Cienaga, August 12; Peru, Pebas, August 3, and Yquitos, +September 2; and Paraguay, Puerto Pinasco, September 21.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Washington, Westport, September +3, and Tacoma, September 20; California, Morro, September 14, +1923 (only record for the State); Montana, Yellowstone County, +September 1; Colorado, Barr, August 25 and September 4 (only +records); Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg, September 5, and Oak Lake, +September 9; North Dakota, Jamestown, September 30; Nebraska, +Lincoln, October 25; Kansas, Salina, October 10; Texas, Brownsville, +October 7, and Corpus Christi, October 10; Wisconsin, Pittston, +September 7, and Rock Prairie, September 10; Michigan, Kalamazoo +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</span>County, September 17; Ohio, Columbus, September 9, Indiana, Lafayette, +September 10; Illinois, Chicago, September 28, and Beach, +October 2; Missouri, Independence, September 15; Kentucky, Bowling +Green, September 7; Quebec, Magdalen Islands, September 13, +and Port Burwell, September 28; Maine, Cape Elizabeth, September +13; Massachusetts, Nantucket, September 8, Plum Island, September +15, Monomoy Island, September 19, and Cape Cod, September 24; +Rhode Island, Middletown, September 10, Newport, September 15, +and Compton, September 23; Connecticut, New Haven, September +30; New York, Orient Point, September 8, Rockaway, September +13, and Mastic, October 6; Lesser Antilles, Barbados, October 6; +Costa Rica, San Jose, October 8; and Panama, Gatun, October 18.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The buff-breasted sandpiper has been recorded as +taken once at Cardenas, Cuba (Gundlach). There are fifteen or +sixteen records for the British Isles, all being for the period from +July to September, except one, taken in May, 1829, at Formby, +Lancashire. It also has been recorded from Abbeville, Picardy, +France (Dalgleish); and from the Province of Owari, Japan +(Stejneger). A record of this species from Heligoland, May 9, 1847, +is considered by Seebohn as possibly <i>T. subminuta</i>.</p> + +<p><i>Egg Dates</i>.—Arctic coasts of Canada and Alaska: 37 records, June +1 to July 18; 19 records, June 28 to July 3.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Spotted"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">ACTITIS MACULARIA</span> <span class="smaller">(Linnaeus)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">SPOTTED SANDPIPER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Winsor Marrett Tyler</i></p> +</div> + +<p>The spotted sandpiper is one of the successful species of birds.</p> + +<p>The old writers, speaking of a time when the surface of the country +was very different from at present, are in accord as to the abundance +of this bird in North America. Wilson (1832) refers to it as “very +common”; Nuttall (1834) says it is “one of the most familiar and +common of all the New England marsh birds”; and Audubon (1840) +reports it “quite abundant along the margins of the Mississippi, the +Ohio, and their tributaries,” and “on the island of Jestico, in the +Gulf of St. Lawrence, about 20 pairs had nests and eggs, * * * and +the air was filled with the pleasant sound of their voices.”</p> + +<p>At the present time we find the bird apparently little diminished in +numbers. In the numerous local lists published from every part of +the country the spotted sandpiper almost always has a place. Notations +such as “seen daily throughout the summer” or “common along +the streams” indicate the wide distribution and abundance of the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</span>species. Indeed it is the best known of our sandpipers, not only +because of its extensive breeding range, extending from coast to coast +and northward into Alaska and Labrador, but by reason of its +individual and peculiar habit of flight and its characteristic notes.</p> + +<p>Almost every inhabitant of the United States, sometime during the +year, may meet this graceful little wader stepping delicately along +the margin of some sandy pond, the shore of the sea, or skimming +from perch to perch on the rocks bordering a mountain stream.</p> + +<p>Poised well above the ground on its slim greenish-yellow legs it +walks slowly and carefully along the shore, picking up a bit of food +now on this side, now on that. It goes forward with a switching +motion, head reached well forward and a little lowered. Except +when creeping up within reach of an insect or when its attention is +riveted on the snapping up of a bit of food the tail is almost continuously +in motion up and down. At the least alarm the motion is +increased to a wider arc until the posterior half of the bird’s body is +rapidly teetering. A little increase in alarm and the bird is off on +vibrating wings held stiffly and cupped with the tips depressed, sailing +along the shore away from danger. As the bird takes wing it +gives, almost without exception, its whistled call, <i>peet-weet-weet</i>, a +call so associated with the bird that Nuttall long ago give it the name +<i>peet-weet</i>.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The spotted sandpiper moves northward earlier than the +other sandpipers. It enters the transitional zone in late April and +early May, its time of arrival coinciding very closely with the +chewink, another ground feeder. It returns to its breeding ground +inconspicuously, never passing by in the large flocks characteristic of +many sandpipers, but appears on the first day of its arrival running +about on the shore of its chosen bit of water, apparently settled for +the season. In this habit of not gathering into flocks it resembles its +relative the solitary sandpiper.</p> + +<p>Wright and Harper (1913) speak of a few birds, left behind after +most of the species had spread over the country to the north, tarrying +in the Okefinokee Swamp till late in the spring:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The spotted sandpiper was a distinct surprise as a summer resident of the +swamp. Not only is this several hundred miles south of its known breeding +range, but one would not expect it to find a suitable haunt in the Okefinokee. +The lakes and rivers are practically shoreless; they are simply open spaces in +the otherwise continuous cypress swamps. However, the logs and driftwood +near the edges of Billys Lake serve as teetering stands; half a dozen were seen +here on May 11, one on June 5, and still another a few days later. The species +probably does not breed in this latitude.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—The courtship of the spotted sandpiper has not been +observed very minutely. Some of the few published reports on the +subject show a discrepancy in details, and one, giving an instance of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</span>display by a bird proved by dissection to be a female, casts doubts on +all records of courtship based on sight identification and raises the +question as to the respective rôles played by the sexes in the home-life +of the species.</p> + +<p>Bradford Torrey (1885), assuming the bird to be a male, speaks of</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A spotted sandpiper, whose capers I amused myself with watching, one day +last June, on the shore of Saco Lake. As I caught sight of him, he was +straightening himself up, with a pretty, self-conscious air, at the same time +spreading his white-edged tail, and calling, <i>tweet, tweet, tweet</i>. Afterwards he +got upon a log, where, with head erect and wings thrown forward and downward, +he ran for a yard or two, calling as before. This trick seemed especially to +please him, and was several times repeated. He ran rapidly, and with a comical +prancing movement; but nothing he did was half as laughable as the behavior +of his mate, who all this while dressed her feathers without once deigning to +look at her spouse’s performance.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Whittle (1922) describes a similar action of a bird observed in +Montana on May 29:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>One of the birds, judged to be a male, was seen standing on a long, inclined +timber, while another, presumed to be a female, fed close by along the shore. +The male first walked the length of the timber and then flew to another one, +where he depressed and spread his tail, and, without teetering, stalked slowly +along its entire length, with head bent low.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Lewis O. Shelley (1925) reports from New Hampshire a courtship +display which differs from the two previous ones. Here again the +respective sexes are assumed:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A female sandpiper came running along the brook, occasionally stopping to +pick up an insect and teeter, then run on again. Behind her were two males, +the first strutting along, looking much like a goose, craning his neck up, swelling +out his throat, drooping his wings, and spreading his tail; the second kept well +to the rear, and did no strutting.</p> + +<p>Every time the female stopped for a second, or slowed, the male would dart +past her and stop, throw his head higher, and make a <i>fump, fump, fump</i>, in his +throat. If that failed to attract her attention, he would again pass her and +alternately spread wings and tail. This performance went on all the afternoon, +until almost dusk.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>This observation describes a courtship in which the behavior of the +aggressive bird corresponds closely, especially in the movements of the +head, with the action of the bird noted in the next quotation—a bird +proved by dissection to be a female.</p> + +<p>A. J. Van Rossem (1925) gives the following extract from Dr. +Loye Miller’s notebook:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Altitude, 9,000 feet; Mammoth Lakes, Inyo County, Calif.; July 4, 1923: +[spotted] sandpipers are just beginning to pair, and several seen in courting +flights. One especially active bird was shot and proved to be a female. She +came to an imitation of the call—soared over a fallen log before alighting on it. +She then ruffed out the feathers and strutted like a turkey cock, with head +thrown back. The ova were the size of buckshot.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The breeding range of the spotted sandpiper, extending +over a vast area of diversified land, ranging in altitude from +sea-level to 14,000 feet, and including both arid and well-watered +country, makes necessary in the bird a wide degree of adaptability +in the choice of its nesting site. Few birds show a greater variation +in this respect and among the places which the bird selects to +lay its eggs there is but one point in common—the proximity of +water.</p> + +<p>The following quotations bring out the extreme variety of nesting +sites: Mearns (1890) writing of the bird in Arizona says: “These birds +were apparently breeding at a small lake, in a crater-like depression +at the summit of a volcanic peak arising near the western base +of the San Francisco cone, the lake being at an altitude of from +10,000 to 10,500 feet.” Shick (1890) reports the bird in New Jersey +as breeding “in the higher parts of the island, generally on a sandy +knoll in the high, rank sedge grass,” and Audubon (1840), speaks +of the nests “in Labrador, where, in every instance, they were concealed +under ledges of rocks extending for several feet over them, so +I probably should not have observed them, had not the birds flown +off as I was passing.” He also speaks, quoting Nuttall, of “their +eggs laid in a strawberry bed.” Dwight (1893) records a nest +“found in an odd situation at Tignish [Prince Edward Island]. It +was under a decayed log in a boggy slope, and was carefully lined +with bits of rotten wood.”</p> + +<p>In the use of material to construct or line its nest the bird shows +nearly as much variation as in the choice of the nesting site and it +may be stated roughly that the more northerly the latitude of the +breeding ground, the bulkier is the nest. Audubon (1840) says, +speaking of the nests found in Labrador:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They were more bulky and more neatly constructed than any that I have +examined southward of the Gulf of St. Lawrence. * * * These nests [those +in Labrador] were made of dry moss, raised to the height of from 6 to 9 +inches, and well finished within with slender grasses and feathers of the +eider duck.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Brewster (1925) speaks of the bird as:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Especially given to breeding on small islands in Lake Umbagog [Maine], +scarce one of which is left untenanted by them at the right season or resorted +to by more than a single pair. Their eggs, almost invariably four in number, +are usually laid during the last week of May, in saucer-shaped hollows scraped +in surface soil, and thinly lined with dry grass. * * * If the island be treeless +and ledgy, the nest is likely to be on or near the most elevated or central +part, and more or less well concealed by grass or other lowly vegetation. But if +all the ground, not subject to inundation, be densely wooded, the spot where the +bird has hidden her treasures is seldom far back from the shore, and perhaps +scarce above highwater mark, usually where driftwood has accumulated, or +beneath the leafy branch of some outstanding alder or Cassandra bush. In +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</span>such places as these, it is by no means easy to find the nest, even when the +total area to be searched is only a few rods square. The task may well seem +hopeless if undertaken in the open farming country about the southern end of +the Lake, for, although spotted sandpipers breed here not uncommonly, they +are so widely and sparsely distributed over hilly pastures and fields of +considerable extent, that it is only by the merest chance that anybody ever +stumbles on a nest. The only one that I have happened upon was well hidden +in a tangle of withered grass and ferns, covering a steeply sloping bank by +the roadside.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In incubation as well as in courtship the male has been shown to +assume duties which are usually ascribed to the female. The following +quotation illustrates this fact. Van Rossem (1925) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On July 11, in a boggy meadow near the water’s edge, we found a nest +of four eggs which seemed nearly fresh. We often had occasion to pass this +nest, but there was never more than one bird present. On July 25 the eggs +had hatched and after a short search we found the downy young in the short +grass. They were collected with the parent, which proved to be the male. The +sides of his breast and belly were worn quite bare of feathers, showing that +he had done most of if not all of the incubating. The succeeding days, we +frequently passed the old nesting place, but never saw any other sandpiper in +the vicinity. On July 26 Alden Miller and the writer were on the headwaters +of the San Joaquin River, in Madera County [California], and while there +found a nest on a grass-grown gravel bar in the river. It contained young +which were just emerging from the shells. These were collected with the +parent which, as in the first case, was a male. We were at this nest and in +the immediate vicinity nearly an hour, but no other adult appeared.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Although as a rule the spotted sandpiper does not build near the +nest of other birds of the same species, in exceptional cases many +pairs nest in close proximity to each other.</p> + +<p>L. McI. Terrill (1911), illustrating this gregarious habit, says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A few years ago a large colony were nesting on Isle Ronde (a small island +of a few acres, opposite the city of Montreal). Visiting this island on May 26, +1896, I located without difficulty 13 occupied nests. Again, on May 31, 1898, I +examined upward of 25. On each occasion only a small portion of the island +was examined, and I estimated that there were well over 100 pairs breeding.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mousley (1916) points out that—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>It may not be generally known that these birds if flushed whilst constructing +their nest invariably desert it, at least this has been my experience on +four occasions, when I have flushed both birds whilst in the act of scooping +out or lining the hole. In one instance, however, they made a fresh nest +within 45 feet of the old one.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—[<span class="smcap">Author’s note</span>: The spotted sandpiper lays almost invariably +4 eggs, very rarely 5, and rarely only 3. These are +ovate in shape, less pyriform than the eggs of most waders, and +they have only a very slight gloss. The prevailing ground color is +“cartridge buff,” with some variations to “pinkish buff,” or “pale +olive buff.” They are irregularly spotted or blotched, usually both; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_83">[Pg 83]</span>sometimes they are finely and evenly sprinkled with small spots; +and very rarely the markings are concentrated at the larger end. +The markings are mostly in very dark browns, “seal brown,” “clove +brown,” and “blackish brown,” and rarely as light as “Mars brown” +or “russet.” The underlying markings are generally lacking or inconspicuous, +but some handsome eggs are blotched with “lavender +gray,” “pallid purple drab,” or “brownish drab.” The measurements +of 88 eggs, in the United States National Museum, average 32 +by 23 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>34</b> +by <b>25</b>, <b>29</b> by 23, and 33 by <b>20</b> millimeters.]</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—The young spotted sandpiper furnishes an instance of +an ancestral habit springing into action almost at the moment of +hatching. When no larger than the egg from which they have just +stepped they run over the sand teetering their tail in the manner of +their parents. My notes mention a little bird, no more than a tiny +ball of fluff, which stood on my hand waving up and down the +feathery plumes of its infinitesimal tail.</p> + +<p>Wilson (1832) says: “The young, as soon as they are freed from +the shell, run about constantly wagging the tail,” and Nuttall (1834) +speaks of “the habit of balancing or wagging the tail, in which +even the young join as soon as they are fledged.”</p> + +<p>Another example of the precociousness of the fledgling sandpiper +is its ability to swim while still in the down. G. M. Sutton (1925) +speaks of the habit thus:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Upon several occasions within the writer’s experience downy young of +the spotted sandpiper, when closely pursued, have taken to the water, where +they swam lightly although not very rapidly in making an escape.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Dr. C. W. Townsend (1920) cites a case in which a young bird, +evidently in juvenal plumage, swam under water:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In Labrador I caught a nearly full-grown young still unable to fly and put +it in a small river. It at once dove and swam under water for a distance +of 3 or 4 feet, using for propulsion its wings and probably its feet, although +I could not be sure of the latter point. It then rose to the surface and swam +to the opposite side like a little duck and walked out on the sand, where the +mother was anxiously calling.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Aretas A. Saunders also mentions in his notes a case of diving:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Young birds when away from the parent and threatened with danger often +take to water and dive and swim under water, using the wings to help swim. +At such times the down is covered with air bubbles, which helps keep them +dry and gives them a silvery appearance. Once I pursued a young bird I +wished to band, and it did this so many times that it became wet in spite of +the air bubbles, and in fact was quite chilled through for a time.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>More commonly the method of escaping danger adopted by the +young sandpipers is to lie motionless on the beach, where a pebbly +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_84">[Pg 84]</span>shore affords an ideal background for concealment. William Palmer +(1909) brings out the success of this ruse thus:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>While walking along a beach one summer a spotted sandpiper (<i>Actitis +macularia</i>) and a single young were noticed some distance ahead. As I +approached the place the old bird, with the startled manner characteristic of +its kind at such a time, kept well ahead, but I could not find the other. Going +back some distance, I waited and soon saw it again with its parent. I repeated +my quest, and again failed to find the youngster. Going back once more and +again seeing it rejoin the old bird, I slowly moved forward, keeping my eyes +this time very intently on it, and soon picked it up from the sand, an unwilling +captive.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>A. A. Saunders gives in his notes a picture of the parental care of +the young. The young birds are—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>able to run and follow the parent when about half an hour from the egg +(two instances). The parent leads them away and watches over them for +a few days after hatching, after which they gradually stray away from +her (?) care. At Flathead Lake [Montana] one bird hatched her young +and led them down the beach, and I followed to see what would happen. +When I got too near the mother (?) called <i>Peet! peet! peet!</i> in a loud, +sharp call. The young immediately flattened themselves down among the +pebbles so effectually I could only find one. I sat down on a log, and after +waiting some 20 minutes the parent quieted down—flew to the opposite side +of her young from me, turned and faced them, and began to call <i>tootawee, +tootawee, tootawee</i> over and over. The young immediately responded and +began a hurried run for the mother (?), calling baby <i>peeps</i> and tumbling over +the pebbles in their eagerness. The parent half spread its wings as they +arrived and they took shelter beneath, just as chickens do under a hen.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The period of incubation is 15 days.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—[<span class="smcap">Author’s note</span>: The young spotted sandpiper in the +natal down is quite uniformly grizzled or mottled on the upper +parts, from crown to rump, with “buffy brown,” “wood brown,” +grayish buff, and black. The forehead is grayish buff, and the +entire under parts are white; a narrow black stripe extends from +the bill through the eye to the nape; a black patch in the center +of the crown extends as an indistinct median stripe down the nape +and broadens to a black band along the back to the rump.</p> + +<p>The juvenal plumage comes in first on the mantle and wings, then +on the flanks, breast, and crown, and lastly on the neck, rump, and +tail. The upper parts are “light brownish olive,” more grayish on +the sides of the neck and chest; the scapulars and upper tail coverts +have a subterminal sepia bar and are tipped with pale buff or +creamy white; the lesser and median wing coverts are conspicuously +barred with pale buff and sepia; the chin, throat, and under parts +are white.</p> + +<p>During the fall, beginning late in August, or in September, some +of the body plumage, tail and some tertials and wing coverts are +molted, producing the first winter plumage. This postjuvenal molt +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</span>is very limited and very variable; I have seen birds in juvenal +plumage as late as December 3. The first winter plumage is like the +adult winter, except for the retained juvenal wing coverts. It is +worn until March or April. The wings are molted during the winter +at any time from October to April; and during March and April +the body plumage is molted, producing the first nuptial plumage. +This is like the adult nuptial, but there is more gray on the sides of +the neck and less spotting on the breast, sometimes very little of the +latter. But the plumage is practically adult, except for a few retained +juvenal wing coverts.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete postnuptial molt beginning with the body +plumage in August, or earlier, and ending with the molt of the +primaries at any time from October to April. In winter plumage +the upper parts are plain “dark grayish olive,” shading off lighter +on the sides of the head and neck; the under parts are white, faintly +washed with grayish on the throat. The partial prenuptial molt, +involving only the body plumage comes in March and April and +produces the spotted breast of the nuptial plumage.]</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—At the seacoast the spotted sandpiper searches for its food +both on the beach and on the muddy borders of creeks and inlets, +wading into the water, however, less frequently than most sandpipers; +inland it feeds along the margins of sandy ponds, sluggish +meadow streams and rushing mountain torrents; in farming country +it strays into the meadows, fields, and market gardens and finds in +all these situations food which it picks up from the low vegetation or +from the ground.</p> + +<p>Like some of the other sandpipers, however, and like several other +birds which have the agility to do so, it easily captures flying insects +even when they are on the wing. In order to come within striking +distance of an insect before it flies away, the spotted sandpiper +resorts to a ruse by which its approaching head and beak are concealed +or made inconspicuous. As the bird walks over windrows +of seaweed and such places where flies abound, it stretches its body +out with the bill pointing straight in front, the whole bird lengthened +into a line with the long axis parallel to the ground. In this position +the head, from the flies’ point of view is masked by the body as a +background and the bird is enabled to come so near that it can snap +up a fly, even after it has taken wing, by a straight forward movement +of the head. In stalking a flying prey the spotted sandpiper +creeps up to the fly, moving slowly with cat-like steps, the tail +motionless, and apparently never adopts the well-known trick of the +semipalmated sandpiper, the running about with the hind part of +the body tilted far upward, advancing upon a fly under cover of +this as a screen.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_86">[Pg 86]</span></p> + +<p>A complete list of the insects which form the spotted sandpiper’s +diet, could one be compiled, would doubtless be a very long one, +comprising as it would both marine and land insects. The wide +range of the bird’s choice of food is shown by the following quotations +which prove definitely that it is a very beneficial species to the +agriculturalist.</p> + +<p>E. H. Forbush (1925), speaking of the bird’s habit of frequenting +cultivated fields, says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They feed largely on locusts, grasshoppers and caterpillars, such as cutworms, +cabbage worms and army worms, also beetles, grubs and other pests +of cultivated lands.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>H. K. Job (1911) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The usual food of most species of this class [shore birds] is aquatic insect +life of all sorts. This is in part the diet of the spotted sandpiper. But as it is +also a bird of field and pasture, its range of insect food is very wide, including +grasshoppers and locusts. Probably almost anything in the insect line is grist +for its hopper, and it is a most useful bird.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Austin H. Clark (1905<i>a</i>) furnishes the following unusual observation:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>While on the island of St. Vincent, West Indies, last October, I observed a +number of our shore birds feeding on the young of a small fish known as the +“tri tri” (<i>Sicydium plumieri</i>), which were at that time ascending the Richmond +River, near which I was staying, by thousands. The land about the lower +reaches of this river was laid completely bare by the recent eruptions of the +Soufrière, and in its present state proves very attractive to all the species of +shore birds which visit the island during the migrations. Those observed or +proved by dissection to be eating the young tri tri (which were at that time +from half an inch to an inch and a quarter long) were * * * solitary sandpipers +(<i>Helodromas solitarius</i>), and spotted sandpipers (<i>Actitis macularia</i>). +All but the last two kept near the mouth of the river, or on the flat lands along +its lower reaches; the solitary sandpiper followed the stream up into what were +formerly arrowroot fields, half or three-quarters of a mile from the sea, and +the spotted sandpiper was found well into the mountain forests.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>W. H. Bergtold (1926) cites an instance of the bird’s catching +another swift-moving fish. He says that the caretakers at the Wigwam +Fishing Club, Colorado, “reported the spotted sandpiper as +also catching trout fry.”</p> + +<p>The following quotation adds crickets to the list of insects; H. W. +Jewell (1909) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>While sitting on the banks of Sandy River one night I was attracted to the +actions of a spotted sandpiper. There were lots of crickets on the shore of the +river, and the sandpiper would catch one in its bill, run up to the water, and +immerse the insect several times, then swallow it. This seemed a very interesting +performance to me, and I wondered if all living insects caught are thus +treated before they are eaten. The cricket is quite a large insect, and as this +bird ate 10 or 12 he did not go to bed hungry that night.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_87">[Pg 87]</span></p> + +<p>Alexander Wetmore (1916), who examined the contents of nine +stomachs, says: “Though mole crickets (<i>Scapteriscus didactylos</i>) +were found in but two stomachs, they form 10.78 per cent of the +total food.” Summarizing his findings, he concludes, “From the +foregoing the spotted sandpiper is a beneficial species and should +not be molested.”</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Nothing is more characteristic of the spotted sandpiper +than its flight. When it first starts from the shore the wings seem +to vibrate like a taut wire; then, as the bird gains headway, they +set and, depressed and quivering, they carry the bird slowly onward, +often swaying from side to side, close to the surface of the water. +As a rule, when startled, the sandpiper takes a semicircular course +and alights a short distance farther up the beach, and if followed +either takes another flight onward or doubles back as a kingfisher +would do under similar circumstances. This scaling flight, somewhat +after the manner of a meadow lark, is seen most commonly +during the summer, but on infrequent occasions the sandpiper lets go +his wings and carries them back with a long, free sweep and speeds +through the air with the rapidity of a swallow. The transition from +one kind of flight to the other is remarkable to see; with outstretched +neck it drives along with regular wing beats, a long, slender, unfamiliar-looking +wader.</p> + +<p>J. T. Nichols mentions in his notes this peculiar flight; he says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>One might be familiar with the bird for years and believe it [the scaling +flight] invariable. Careful attention in late summer and fall, however, will +demonstrate that it is not. When, as rarely happens, the spotted sandpiper +rises to some height to make a considerable aerial passage (especially over +a stretch of marsh) the flight becomes regular like that of a miniature yellowlegs, +or swift and darting as it sometimes is with a white-rumped sandpiper +for instance. It also, at times, flies low over the tops of the marsh grass in +this last named manner. To identify such birds in the air is very difficult, +and they will pass for some one of the other sandpipers of rather small size +if one does not chance to appreciate the slenderer neck and somewhat different +shape, or the more uniform color of the upper parts.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The ability to swim and dive which is so noticeable in the young of +the spotted sandpiper is even more remarkably evident in the behavior +of the adult bird. Of the many instances recorded in the +literature, the following will illustrate this well developed proclivity.</p> + +<p>E. H. Forbush (1912) speaks thus of the action of a wounded +bird:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In September, 1876, I saw a wounded bird of this species when pursued, +dive into deep water from the shore of the Charles River and fly off under +water, using its wings somewhat as a bird would use them in the air. All its +plumage was covered with bubbles of air, which caught the light until the +bird appeared as if studded with sparkling gems as it sped away into the +depths of the dark river.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</span></p> + +<p>Later (1925) he adds a record of the bird actually running along +the bottom while entirely submerged. The spotted sandpiper—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>can dive from the surface of the water or from full flight, at need. Under +water it progresses by using its wings which it spreads quite widely, and in +shallow water it can go to the bottom and run a short distance with head +held low and tail raised like an ouzel or dipper.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>G. M. Sutton (1925) describes the behavior of two birds which +he startled by a close sudden approach. In the first quotation +he shows that the spotted sandpiper readily dives while on the wing +and continues its flight under water and in the second quotation he +shows the bird’s ability to rise directly into the air from beneath +the water, a feat impossible for many water birds.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When the bird first flushed, its wings were fully spread, and it was headed for +the open water of the lake. Upon seeing me towering above it, however, it +turned its course abruptly downward, and without the slightest hesitation +flew straight into the water. With wings fully outspread and legs kicking +it made its way rather slowly along the sandy bottom, until it was about 8 +feet out, in water over 3 feet deep. I pursued the bird, thinking at the time, +strangely enough, that it was wounded. When I reached for it, it tried to go +farther but apparently could not. Bubbles of air came from its mouth, and +air bubbles were plainly seen clinging to the plumage of its back. At the +time it was captured its mouth, eyes, and wings were all open, under water, and +it remained at the bottom seemingly without difficulty. As it lay in my hands +above water it seemed tired for a second or two, and then, without warning, +shook itself a little, leaped into the air, and with loud, clear whistles, circled +off a few inches above the water to a distant point of land.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>On a subsequent occasion, May 7, 1925, Mr. Sutton—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>purposely came upon a spotted sandpiper suddenly and witnessed it employ +almost the identical tactics in making an effective escape. At this time, however, +the bird dove into running water, swam with wings and feet rapidly +moving for about 20 feet, and emerged down stream, still flying, and made off +in its characteristic way, only a few inches above the water.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>L. L. Jewel (1915), watching a sandpiper in Panama under most +favorable circumstances was able to make out clearly the position +of the feet while the bird was swimming under water. The beach +where Mr. Jewel made this observation was, as he describes it:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A wide coral reef, bare at low tide, and with occasional openings or “wells” +connected underneath with the sea. Some of these are of considerable size +and the water in all is as clear as crystal to all depths—clear as only those +who have seen such tropical “coral water” can imagine. * * *</p> + +<p>I had however a perfect view of the bird as he “flew” the 10 feet across +the pool, through the beautifully clear water which showed white pebbles +distinctly on a bottom perhaps 20 feet below. The bird crossed at a uniform +depth of 18 inches to 2 feet, which he held until he brought up against +the opposite wall. The head and neck were extended but not at all stretched +while the legs and feet trailed behind with flexed toes, like a heron in flight. +The wings seemed to be opened to only perhaps half their full extent—the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</span>primaries pointing well backward like wings are trimmed as birds cut down +from some height to alight. The wing-beats were slow and even but not +labored, and progress was uniform and not at all hurried.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In addition to the anomalous behavior of the spotted sandpiper in +and under the water, the bird shows a further departure from the +regular habits of the other shore birds in its ability and frequent +tendency to perch on small supports which requires a grasping power +in the feet to hold the bird in place. My notes supply an extreme +instance of this habit, noting the action of an adult bird (exercised, +to be sure, over the safety of its young) which alighted on a +slender wire running between poles and stood crouched a little and +leaning forward, but keeping its balance by securely gripping the +wire.</p> + +<p>The literature furnishes one other record of grasping a wire. +L. L. Snyder (1924) reports thus:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On June 25, 1923, at Orient Bay, Lake Nipigon, Ontario, the writer observed +a spotted sandpiper perching on a telegraph wire. The fact that +the species was perching was not surprising but the size of the perch made +the observation of interest. The bird was not in an erect position, being +squatted, which probably made the feat less difficult. In this case the act +was entirely voluntary and not an instance of unusual conduct due to the +pressure of an emergency.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Other quotations, showing the bird acting in unsandpiper-like +behavior follow. Mousley (1915) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On one occasion only have I seen a very excited parent bird with young +alight on a cat-tail head, and very out of place and uncomfortable it seemed +to be.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>H. H. Cleaves (1908) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>We were returning along a rather unused railroad when, in an area to +one side, which was flooded for the most part with a number of inches of +water, we noticed a spotted sandpiper flying about in circles and acting +peculiarly. We had all come to the conclusion that her young were about +somewhere, when she did a most peculiar thing. The wet area in question +was covered with considerable underbrush, out of which grew rather tall, +second-growth timber. The sandpiper alighted on the tops of some of these +trees, on the small twigs, and remained balancing there for some time, fully +25 or 30 feet from the ground. This performance she repeated several times, +making her appear for all the world like a perching bird.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>P. A. Taverner (1919) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Common all along the river [Red Deer River, Alberta] and breeding everywhere. +One bird on being flushed from her eggs flew into adjoining bushes +and climbed about them in a most unwaderlike style while complaining at our +intrusion.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>J. T. Nichols points out in his notes that the foot of the spotted +sandpiper is adapted to its peculiar habits; that the bird is able +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</span>to grasp a small object because the front toes are nearer together +than in most waders and the hind toe is more developed. He says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The footmarks of the spotted sandpiper on moist sand or mud are recognizable. +Compared to those of related birds the toes are relatively little +spreading, and the mark left by the hind toe relatively large and conspicuous.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Under the title “Spotted Sandpiper Removing its Young” J. C. +Merrill (1898) describes a very remarkable performance, the only +record of such behavior noted in the literature.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A clearly observed case of the spotted sandpiper (<i>Actitis macularia</i>) removing +its young by flight recently came under my notice, and I place it upon +record, as such instances are rarely seen, though they are, perhaps, of tolerably +frequent occurrence, as in the case of the woodcock.</p> + +<p>Last summer, in the month of July, I frequently landed on a little rocky +islet near the head of the Saquenay River, shortly after it issues from Lake +St. John. Each time a spotted sandpiper showed much concern for her young, +which were often seen running about and were a few days old. On one of +these occasions, the mother ran ahead of me to a point of rocks near which I +stopped to fish. A few moments later she flew, circling in the usual manner, +and as she passed in front of me and within a few feet, I saw one of the +young beneath her body, apparently clasped by her thighs; its head was +directed forward, somewhat outstretched, and was seen with perfect distinctness. +The parent’s legs were apparently hanging down as she flew, though +I am not positive that what I saw were not the legs of the young. The mother +was in sight for about 60 yards, flying heavily and silently, and landed on a +large island, though I could not see her at the moment of alighting.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—The notes of the spotted sandpiper are mainly modified +and extended from its common alarm note, the sharp, clear whistle, +<i>peet-weet</i>, but as in the case of many birds, degrees of emotion may +be expressed by a little change in pitch or inflection. When considerably +alarmed the bird continues to repeat the <i>weet</i> note often +giving a long series which trails off in diminuendo like the quacking +of a duck.</p> + +<p>J. T. Nichols (1920) describes a series of notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p><i>Hoy, hoy, weet, weet, weet, weet, weet, weet, weet</i> is a prolonged call frequently +heard in the early part of the nesting season, in toto or in part, +suggesting in that respect the songs of the cuckoos. It doubtless has value as +advertisement or location notice and something the significance of a very +generalized song. A series of loud <i>weets</i>, heard also at other times of year, +the most far-reaching call of the species, doubtless serves as location notice.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>A. A. Saunders in his notes similarly describes the “song.” He +says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I believe the long call <i>weet, weet, weet, weet, weet, weet, weet, peet a weet, +peet a weet, peet a weet, peet a weet</i> serves as a song. I have seen it sung in +flight, when the actions and flight of the bird were similar to those of other +flight singers.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Both of these observers describe the soft crooning note used by +the parent to bring together its young. Nichols says that, “a rolling +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</span>note, <i>kerrwee, kerrwee, kerrwee</i>, now loud, now very low and distant, +has been heard from an adult with the evident purpose of +assembling her young; and Saunders speaks of a parent bird which +called to its young, <i>tootawee, tootawee, tootawee, tootawee</i> over and +over. The call is like the <i>peet a weet</i> in form, but lower pitched and +softer.”</p> + +<p>A common note, heard during the summer on the breeding ground +when the birds are undisturbed, resembles closely the whistle of the +little frog, <i>Hyla pickeringii</i>. This is a far-reaching whistled note, +not given in a series like the <i>weet, weet</i> call. It is a single note, +apparently, repeated over and over again, not regularly, but always +with an interval between each repetition.</p> + +<p>It is clear that Nichols has this note in mind when he says, “<i>Pip! +pip! pip!</i> is a note heard between adult birds in the breeding season +which seems to be of polite address, or possibly impolite, as it is +almost identical in form with a note of protest by old birds when +nest or young are threatened.”</p> + +<p>Continuing, he describes two other notes, “the <i>pit-wit-wit</i> frequently +heard from adults as a note of departure may best be considered +a variation of this one [the <i>pip wip</i> of the young] as also the +<i>peet weet weet</i> or <i>weet weet</i> most frequent a little later in the season +as little companies of birds start out over the water for longer or +shorter distances.</p> + +<p>“An old bird, surprised near her brood and fluttering off playing +wounded called <i>cheerp cheerp</i> a sort of scream as of pain and fear.”</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The spotted sandpiper is one of the prettiest, most +delicate, and trim of the shore birds; in place of the browns and +greys of the streaked upper parts of most waders there is a plain +greenish sheen on the back, and in autumn across the breast a soft +tint like a fawn. Through the glass the wings show a fine mottling, +suggesting a wren. The line of white at the posterior margin of the +open wing is a good diagnostic mark, and its habit of teetering makes +identification certain. The only bird which resembles the spotted +sandpiper at all closely is its larger relative the solitary sandpiper, +but the characteristic motion of this bird is a ploverlike hitching +movement or bob, as if hiccoughing, very different from the spotted +sandpiper’s rapid swaying up and down of the hinder part of the +body.</p> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—The chief enemies of the spotted sandpiper are the +swift-moving hawks, whose pursuit it sometimes successfully eludes +by diving in the manner described above. J. E. H. Kelso (1926) +records an instance of this habit. He says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Skirting the lake shore in my sneak boat a spotted sandpiper was repeatedly +disturbed, flew along in front of the boat to settle again and again on the shore. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</span>It then made off to cross a small bay, when a pigeon hawk dashed out from +some trees and made a stoop or two at the dodging sandpiper, which would +certainly soon have been captured in the air if it had not suddenly alighted on +the water. This for a few seconds confused the hawk, which circled just over +its quarry and appeared to try to capture it with its talons. The sandpiper +dove, remaining under 3 or 4 seconds. The hawk on the disappearance of its +intended victim at once made off at a great pace.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>W. H. Osgood (1909) describes an escape in this manner from an +attack by a northern shrike.</p> + +<p>Wilson (1832) in his most charming manner tells this delightful +story:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>My venerable friend, Mr. William Bartram, informs me that he saw one of +these birds defend her young for a considerable time from the repeated attacks +of a ground squirrel. The scene of action was on the river shore. The parent +had thrown herself, with her two young behind her, between them and the land, +and at every attempt of the squirrel to seize them by a circuitous sweep raised +both her wings in an almost perpendicular position, assuming the most formidable +appearance she was capable of, and rushed forwards on the squirrel, who, +intimidated by her boldness and manner, instantly retreated; but presently +returning was met, as before, in front and on flank by the daring and affectionate +bird, who with her wings and whole plumage bristling up seemed +swelled to twice her usual size. The young crowded together behind her, apparently +sensible of their perilous situation, moving backward and forward as she +advanced or retreated. This interesting scene lasted for at least 10 minutes; +the strength of the poor parent began evidently to flag, and the attacks of the +squirrel became more daring and frequent, when my good friend, like one of +those celestial agents who in Homer’s time so often decided the palm of victory, +stepped forward from his retreat, drove the assailant back to his hole, and +rescued the innocent from destruction.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>A. A. Saunders sends the following suggestive note:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Once on Sherwoods Island, Westport, Conn., in September, I saw a bird fly +ahead of me with something large and black looking dangling beneath it. The +bird could hardly fly and tried to hide in the beach grass as I approached. I +caught it and found that a large specimen of the common edible mussel (<i>Mytilus +edulis</i>) had closed its shell on the middle toe of the bird’s left foot. The toe +was nearly severed just above the nail, and since I couldn’t pry the mussel open, +I cut through the bit of skin left and freed the bird.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—As is the case during its northward migration, the spotted +sandpiper leaves its breeding ground and moves to its winter quarters +inconspicuously, showing little tendency to gather into flocks. Its +voice is not infrequently heard among the notes of the autumnal nocturnal +migrants—an indication that the bird in a measure makes use +of the safe, dark hours during its long journey southward.</p> + +<p>Cooke (1897) says: “In the fall [in Colorado] it ranges above the +pines to 14,000 feet,” illustrating the tendency to wander about in +autumn.</p> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—During the years, now past, when the smaller shore birds +could legally be shot for food or sport the spotted sandpiper suffered +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</span>less than some of the other Limicolae by reason of its more solitary +habit. The gunners, waiting for several of their tiny target to come +within range of a single shot, often disregarded a spotted sandpiper +running alone on the shore.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—Most of the spotted sandpipers leave the United States +to spend the winter on the islands to the southward, and in South +America, but the species is nevertheless well represented in California +during the winter, and in the Southern States on the Atlantic +seaboard.</p> + +<p>George Willett (1912) “found this species plentiful in winter +around Santa Barbara Islands and on rocky shores of the mainland.”</p> + +<p>Dr. Alexander Wetmore (1916) speaking of the bird as a winter +visitant of Porto Rico says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>It frequents the mangrove swamps, borders of lagoons, margins of all the +streams, and occasionally the sandy beaches. During the winter season it follows +inland along the small streams and occurs throughout the island.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>And (1927) reporting the birds’ winter status in South America +says—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>It is a regular migrant in South America as far as Bolivia and southern Brazil, +and on March 4, 1918, several were found by Mogensen at Concepcion, Province +of Tucuman, in northern Argentina. On October 25, 1920, one was taken by the +writer near the mouth of the Rio Ajo on the eastern coast of the Province of +Buenos Aires, the southernmost point at which the species is known.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North and South America; accidental in Europe.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The breeding range of the spotted sandpiper extends +north to Alaska (Kobuk River, Fort Yukon, and Circle); +Yukon (La Pierre House); Mackenzie (Fort McPherson, Arctic Red +River, Fort Anderson, Aylmer Lake, Clinton-Colden Lake, and Artillery +Lake); Manitoba (Fort Du Brochet, Fort Churchill, and York +Factory); Ungava (Fort Chimo); and Labrador (Okak). East of +Labrador (Okak and Rigolet); eastern Quebec (Sloop Harbor and +Wolf Bay); Newfoundland (Humber River and Penguin Island); +Nova Scotia (Breton Island, Pictou, and Yarmouth); Maine (Thomaston); +New Hampshire (Portsmouth); Massachusetts (Boston and +Woods Hole); Rhode Island (Block Island); New York (Shelter +Island); New Jersey (Red Bank and Five-mile Beach); Maryland +(Cambridge); Virginia (Cobb Island and Richmond); North Carolina +(Kona, Fort Macon, and Wilmington); and probably South +Carolina (Chester and Columbia). South to probably South Carolina +(Columbia); probably Georgia (Okefinokee Swamp); Alabama +(Autauga County and Greensboro); Louisiana (New Orleans, Baton +Rouge, and Vermilion Bay); Texas (Corsicana, Calhoun County, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</span>Austin, Buffalo Bayou, Kerrville, Concho County, and Tom Green +County); New Mexico (Las Vegas, Willis, and Espanola); Arizona +(Camp Verde); and California (Santa Paula). West to California +(Santa Paula, Kernville, Lime Kiln, Royal Arches, Lake Tahoe, and +Eagle Lake); Oregon (Fort Klamath, Elkton, Eugene, Corvallis, +Salem, Dayton, and Portland); Washington (Bellingham Bay); +British Columbia (Vancouver and Skidegate); and Alaska (Lewis +Point, Sitka, Idaho Inlet, Glacier Bay, Hinchinbrook Island, Port +Nell Juan, Lake Clark, Mount McKinley, Nulato, and Kobuk River).</p> + +<p>Nonbreeding individuals also have been observed in summer in the +Bahama Islands; Porto Rico; Jamaica; Guadeloupe; Barbados; +Grenada; St. Vincent; Dominica; Martinique; Florida (Fruitland +Park, Indian Key, and Seven Oaks); Chihuahua (Pachaco); and +Nyarit (Tres Marias Islands).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—In winter, the spotted sandpiper ranges north +rarely to British Columbia (Courtenay and Chilliwack); Arizona +(Camp Verde and Salt River Bird Reservation); New Mexico (Carlsbad); +Texas (Fort Brown); probably Louisiana (Vermilion Bay); +and rarely Virginia (James River peninsula). East to rarely Virginia +(James River peninsula); South Carolina (Sea Islands and +Port Royal); Georgia (Savannah, Blackbeard Island, and St. +Marys); Florida (Fernandina, Daytona, New Smyrna, Malabar, St. +Lucie, Miami, Key Largo, and Key West); the Bahama Islands (Andros); +Cuba (Santiago de Cuba); Haiti (Monte Christi); Porto +Rico (Cartagena Lagoon, Mameyes, and Caguas); the Lesser Antilles +(Dominica, St. Lucia, Barbados, Carriacou, and Trinidad); British +Guiana (Bartica and Georgetown); French Guiana (Cayenne); and +Brazil (Mixiana, Marajo, Para, and Bahia). South to Brazil (Bahia +and Santa Fe); Bolivia (San Francisco); and Peru (Lima). West +to Peru (Lima, Huacho, and Tumbez); Ecuador (Santa Elena, +Quito, and Esmeraldas); Galapagos Islands (Albemarle); Colombia +(Puerto Berrio); Panama (Panama City); Costa Rica (La Estrella +de Cartago, and San Jose); Nicaragua (Escondido River); Salvador +(La Libertad); Honduras (Chamelecon); Guatemala (Lake Atitlan); +Oaxaca (Tehuantepec City); Lower California (San Jose del +Cabo and La Paz); Sonora (Alamos); California (San Clemente +Island, Santa Catalina Island, Santa Cruz Island, and Marysville); +rarely Oregon (probably Klamath Lake, Elkton, and Portland); +probably Washington (Seattle, Clallam Bay, and Port Angeles); and +rarely British Columbia (Courtenay).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: North Carolina, +Raleigh, April 3, Andrews, April 5, and Weaverville, April 10; +Virginia, Miller, April 10, Bowers Hill, April 12, and Camp Eustis, +April 14; West Virginia, Waverly, April 4, White Sulphur Springs, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</span>April 6, and Lewisburg, April 11; District of Columbia, Washington, +April 2; Maryland, Cambridge, April 13, and Sandy Spring, April +18; Delaware, Wilmington, April 27; Pennsylvania, Phillipsburg, +March 27, Jeffersonville, March 31, Wallingford, April 1, Beaver, +April 2, and Berwyn, April 5; New Jersey, New Brunswick, March +30, Deep Water Point Light, April 14, and Camden, April 16; New +York, Rhinebeck, March 20, Locust Grove, April 2, Geneva, April 13, +and Branchport, April 15; Connecticut, Canaan, April 14, Portland, +April 18, and Fairfield, April 21; Rhode Island, Block Island, April +6; Massachusetts, Dorchester, April 12, Woods Hole, April 13, Holyoke, +April 15, and Harvard, April 25; Vermont, Woodstock, April +23, Rutland, April 25, and St. Johnsbury, April 27; New Hampshire, +Tilton, April 26, Peterboro, April 28, and Hanover, April 30; Maine, +Westbrook, April 14, Ellsworth, April 16, and Portland, April 26; +Quebec, Montreal, April 26, and Quebec, May 2; New Brunswick, +Scotch Lake, May 2, and Blacksville, May 5; Nova Scotia, Yarmouth, +May 4, and Wolfville, May 9; Arkansas, Tillar, March 17, and Monticello, +March 22; Tennessee, Knoxville, April 3, and Athens, April +10; Kentucky, Bowling Green, March 29; Missouri, Marshall, March +27; Illinois, Peoria, March 20, Odin, March 24, and Rantoul, April 5; +Indiana, Vigo County, March 20, Greencastle, April 1, and Vincennes, +April 3; Ohio, Cleveland, March 29, Columbus, April 8, Canton, April +9, and Oberlin, April 10; Michigan, Vermontville, April 6, Ann Arbor, +April 13, Battle Creek, April 14, and Grand Rapids, April 19; +Ontario, Plover Mills, April 12, Guelph, April 13, and Ottawa, April +16; Iowa, Ottumwa, March 28, Elkader, March 30, and Emmetsburg, +April 3; Wisconsin, Milwaukee, March 30, and Shiocton, April 13; +Minnesota, Lake City, April 3, Brainerd, April 16, Lanesboro, April +18, and Minneapolis, April 19; Oklahoma, Ponca City, March 31; +Kansas, Manhattan, April 5, Lawrence, April 7, Blue Rapids, April +9, and Wichita, April 15; Nebraska, Lincoln, April 18; South Dakota, +Sioux Falls, April 10, Forestburg, April 15, and Pitrodie, April 23; +Manitoba, Killarney, April 22, Alexander, April 24, and Aweme, +April 25; Saskatchewan, Indian Head, May 3, and Eastend, May 7; +Mackenzie, Fort Simpson, May 19; Colorado, Greeley, March 18, +Mesa County, March 18, and Colorado Springs, April 16; Wyoming, +Lake Como, May 2; Idaho, Rathdrum, May 1, and Rupert, May 3; +Montana, Billings, April 1, and Columbia Falls, May 4; Alberta, +Stony Plain, April 22, Carvel, April 30, and Athabaska Landing, +May 6; Yukon, Dawson, May 24; and Alaska, Kuskokwim River, +May 12, Craig, May 16, Nulato, May 22, and Forrester Island, +May 24.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Peru, Rio Perene, March 9, and +La Merced, March 23; Brazil, Praia de Cajetuba, April 12, Santarem, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</span>April 12, and Matto Grosso, April 1; Venezuela, San Bricene, April +21; Ecuador, Lake Colta, April 5, and San Pedro River, April 11; +Colombia, La Concepcion, March 23; Panama, Chiriqui, April 13; +Costa Rica, Guapeles, March 5; Guatemala, Puerto Barrios, April 7; +Pueblo, Altisco, May 22; Yucatan, Tizimin, May 16; Tamaulipas, +Victoria, April 16; Sonora, Hermosillo, April 30; Lower California, +La Paz, April 16, and Gardners Laguna, April 23; Lesser Antilles, +St. Croix, April 27; Porto Rico, Patillas, May 13, and Cartagena +Lagoon, May 23; Haiti, April 11; Cuba, Guantanamo, May 5; +Bahama Islands, Andros, April 21, Cay Lobos Light, April 25, and +Abaco, April 28; and Florida, Gainesville, May 10, Daytona Beach, +May 11, Palma Sola, May 22, St. Marks, May 24, and Pensacola, May +31.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of fall arrival are: Florida, Palma +Sola, July 7, Pensacola, July 18, Daytona Beach, July 21, and St. +Marks, July 21; Porto Rico, Manati, July 9 and Bayamon, July 20; +Lesser Antilles, St. Bartholomew, August 3; Lower California, Los +Coronados Islands, August 6; Tehuantepec, San Mateo, August 14; +British Honduras, Manatee Lagoon, August 16; Guatemala, Duenas, +September 2; Nicaragua, Escondido River, July 30, and Bluefields, +September 17; Costa Rica, Ujurras de Terraba, September 16; Panama, +August 4; Colombia, Fundacion, August 16, Barbacoas, August +30, Cienaga, September 13, and Valle Dupar, September 25; Venezuela, +Curaçao, July 27, and Macuto, August 4; Ecuador, Guainche, +August 27, Guayaquil, August 28, and Portovelo, September 2; Peru, +Trujillo, September 1, and Eten, September 7; and Guiana, Abary +Creek, October 6, and Cayenne, October 18.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Alaska, Wrangel, October 9, +and Kenai River, November 14; Yukon, mouth of Moose River, +October 1; Alberta, Red Deer River, September 17; Montana, +Missoula, September 17, and Columbia Falls, September 22; Idaho, +Priest River, September 19, and Rupert, October 2; Wyoming, +Yellowstone Park, September 17; Colorado, Boulder, September 22, +Denver, September 23, and Mesa County, October 7; Mackenzie, +Great Slave Lake, September 16, and Point Brule, October 1; Saskatchewan, +Eastend, September 10; Manitoba, Margaret, October 4, +Aweme, October 7, and Killarney, October 18; South Dakota, Wall +Lake, October 13, and Forestburg, October 20; Kansas, Topeka, +October 11, and Lawrence, October 14; Oklahoma, Copan, October 4, +and Caddo, October 16; Minnesota, St. Vincent, October 14, and +Lanesboro, November 2; Wisconsin, Madison, October 4, Racine, +October 6, and Burlington, October 14; Iowa, Newton, October 25, +Sioux City, November 3, and Coralville, November 8; Ontario, +Toronto, October 11, London, October 25, and Ottawa, October 30; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</span>Michigan, Charity Island, September 28, Ann Arbor, October 9, and +Jackson, October 27; Ohio, Huron, October 21, Sandusky, October +24, Cedar Point, October 30, and Columbus, November 7; Indiana, +Albion, October 17, Elkhart, October 19, and New Harmony, October +23; Illinois, Chicago, September 29, Maxwell, October 10, and +Urbana, October 18; Missouri, St. Louis, October 11, and Jaspar +City, October 15; Kentucky, Bowling Green, October 13; Tennessee, +Athens, October 11, and Knoxville, October 24; Nova Scotia, Pictou, +October 9; New Brunswick, Scotch Lake, October 4; Quebec, +Montreal, October 2, and Quebec, October 12; Maine, Portland, October +8, Kennebec County, October 15, and Orono, October 21; Massachusetts, +Woods Hole, October 20, Braintree, October 22, and Boston, +November 2; Rhode Island, Newport, October 3; Connecticut, Portland, +October 15, Hartford, October 19, and Windsor, October 20; +New York, New York City, October 13, Collins, October 15, and +Highland Falls, October 15; New Jersey, Camden, October 17; Pennsylvania, +Renovo, October 18, and Berwyn, October 28; and Maryland, +Plummer Island, October 28.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—Spotted sandpipers have been detected twice in +Argentina, Concepcion on March 4, 1918, and mouth of the Rio Ajo, +October 25, 1920 (Wetmore). It also has been reported from Europe +on numerous instances, among which the following cases from the +British Isles, seem to be authentic: Two near Belfast, July and +September, 1928; one near Whitby, March 29, 1849; one at Kingsbury +Reservoir, Middlesex (date ?); two at Warrington, Lancashire, May, +1863; two at Eastbourne, Sussex, in October, 1866; and two at +Aberdeen in August, 1867 (Dalgleish).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Labrador: 7 records, June 1 to July 16. Quebec to +Nova Scotia: 53 records, May 20 to July 4; 27 records, June 15 to +19. New England and New York: 41 records, May 19 to July 9; +21 records, May 30 to June 13. Ohio to Iowa: 16 records, May 14 +to July 6; 8 records, May 31 to June 16. California to Washington: +13 records, June 7 to July 7; 7 records, June 15 to 28. Alaska and +Mackenzie: 26 records, June 10 to July 22; 13 records, June 15 to +July 7.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Long"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">NUMENIUS AMERICANUS</span> Bechstein<br> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">LONG-BILLED CURLEW</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>One can not see this magnificent bird for the first time without +experiencing a thrill of enthusiasm for the largest, one of the most +interesting and notable of our shore birds, one that seems to embody +more than any other the wild, roving spirit of the vast open prairies. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</span>Its large size, its long, curving bill, the flash of cinnamon in its +wings, and above all, its loud, clear, and prolonged whistling notes +are bound to attract attention. In its former abundance this species +must have been a most striking feature of the western plains, as it +flew in large wedge-shaped flocks in full cry. The last of the great +open prairies are rapidly disappearing; and with them are going +the curlews, the marbled godwits, the upland plover, the longspurs, +and a host of other birds that can not stand the encroachments of +agriculture.</p> + +<p>The long-billed curlew formerly bred over a large portion of +central North America, including all of the prairie regions, at least +as far east as Michigan and Illinois, and probably Ohio. But, with +the settling of the country and the disappearance of the prairies, it +has been gradually driven farther and farther west, and even there +into a more and more restricted range. It seems to me that we can +hope for its survival only on the maintenance of large, open ranges +as grazing lands for cattle where it still continues to breed.</p> + +<p>It was apparently quite common as a migrant in New England +up to about the middle of the last century. The birds seen here +were probably migrants from the more eastern prairies. The numerous +citations given by Edward H. Forbush (1912) show its gradual +decline, until now it is only a rare straggler anywhere on the Atlantic +coast. In Audubon’s time it was abundant in winter and as a migrant +on the coasts of Florida and South Carolina. I have never seen +one during my various seasons in Florida and Arthur T. Wayne +(1910) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Since 1885 is has been supplanted by the Hudsonian curlew (<i>N. hudsonicus</i>), +which is still exceedingly abundant during the spring and autumn migrations. +From 1879 to 1885, <i>americanus</i> was to be found in the immediate vicinity of +Charleston, but its numbers steadily diminished year after year until at the +present time it is so rare that it is seldom seen; in fact I have not seen one +since September 23, 1899. Audubon, in his Birds of America, states, upon the +authority of Doctor Bachman, that this curlew “breeds on the islands on the +coast of South Carolina, and it places its nests so close together, that it is almost +impossible for a man to walk between them without injuring the eggs.” +It may appear hypercritical to question Doctor Bachman’s statement that this +species bred on the coast islands, but the eggs were not described by either +Audubon or himself, and as far back as 1879 there were no eggs of <i>N. americanus</i> +in the Charleston Museum, while the eggs of the “Stone Curlew” (<i>Catoptrophorus +semipalmatus</i>) were well represented and were classified as eggs of the +long-billed curlew, I have been unable to obtain any evidence, even from the +“oldest inhabitants,” that this species ever bred anywhere on the South +Carolina coast.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Dr. Thomas S. Roberts (1919) says of its status in Minnesota:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>As late at least as 1883 it was still breeding in southern Jackson County +(J. W. Preston) and Gleason saw a single bird of this species near Euclid, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</span>Polk County, on June 17, 1897, which at that date may be assumed to have +been a breeding bird. This report of Gleason’s is the very last record of the +long-billed curlew in Minnesota known to the writer. It ceased to be generally +abundant somewhere about 1880 and rapidly decreased in numbers, even as a +migrant, until it disappeared entirely about the close of the last century.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>It apparently ceased to breed in Illinois before 1880; the last +published breeding record was in 1873. It probably still breeds in +the interior of Texas and perhaps on the coastal prairies as well, for +J. J. Carroll writes to me that on July 9 and 10, 1926, he saw 8 or +10 long-billed curlews near Matagorda Bay that acted as if they had +young. It is now a very rare bird at any season east of the Mississippi +River.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The spring migration is now a general northward movement +throughout the western half of the United States; there was +formerly a heavy flight up the Atlantic coast as far as the Carolinas +and a straggling flight farther north. The migration begins +in March, but the main movement is during April and most of the +birds reach their breeding grounds in April. Only one of my correspondents +in Manitoba and Alberta mentions the long-billed curlew +and he has seen only one in 15 years; so it must be disappearing very +rapidly there.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—The spring behavior of these curlews, or what might +be called a nuptial flight is thus described by P. M. Silloway (1900):</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>After their arrival, the curlews inhabit the high, dry prairies, flying restlessly +from one portion to another, showing a tendency to associate in pairs, though +as couples, these birds are not inseparable. In the mating season, one of the +pair is likely to follow the other in a few moments, when the first bird has +flown far over the prairie to a more distant station. At any time the loud, +prolonged whistling of these birds, either when on the ground or a-wing, will +call attention to their movements, warning the disturber of their domain that +his presence is known and that his actions will be watched with the closest +interest.</p> + +<p>One of the pleasing sights to the ornithologist in watching the behavior of +these curlews is seen when a pair are sailing upward in company abreast of +the wind, moving in perfect accord on widespread, motionless pinions curved +gently downward, within several feet of each other, then fluttering downward +side by side or one in advance of the other, again to sail upward, uttering +the characteristic whistles.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The long-billed curlew is likely to nest almost anywhere +on the boundless prairie, though we have found it, in Saskatchewan, +showing a decided preference for damp, grassy hollows in the prairie, +or long slopes near the lakes or watercourses. The nest is a very +simple affair, a slight hollow in the ground, usually thinly lined with +grasses or weeds; but sometimes quite a substantial platform of grass +is made and slightly hollowed. The female is often quite conspicuous, +as she sits on the nest with her neck stretched out on the ground, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_100">[Pg 100]</span>and can sometimes be seen at a distance of 100 feet; she usually sits +very closely and can sometimes be approached within 8 or 10 feet +before flushing.</p> + +<p>In some notes sent to me by A. O. Treganza, from Box Elder and +Weber Counties, Utah, he says that in one “particular locality +(Weber County) the birds seem to be quite gregarious, possibly due +to food conditions. While there are many square miles of what seems +to be similar country, they seem to have chosen a very small area in +which to breed.” Here he found sometimes two females sharing the +same nest, resulting in sets of from five to eight eggs. In other +localities, in Box Elder County, they do not seem to be at all gregarious. +In one instance he found four eggs of the western willet and +one of the curlew in a nest, with both the willet and curlew on guard.</p> + +<p>P. M. Silloway (1903) has had some extensive experience with the +nesting of the long-billed curlew in Fergus County, Mont. Some of +his nests were on the high dry prairie a long way from any water, +but most of them were in such situations as I have described above. +Several of his nests were in depressions beside dried cow dung, +where, perhaps, the bird was not quite so conspicuous; and chips +of dried cow dung often entered into the composition of the nest. +In a typical nest “the cavity was 8 inches across and 2 inches deep. +The brim of the nest was elevated an inch and a half above the +surroundings.” He has written (1900 and 1903) some interesting accounts +of his experiences in hunting for nests, and sums up the +behavior of the birds as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The male curlew is a most jealous guardian of the premises near the nest. +When the female is sitting on her eggs, the male will denote a watchful interest +in the movements of anyone who is within several hundred yards of the nest. +At such times he will come flying from some quarter of the pasture, and with +angry cackling will alight near the disturber, impatiently feeding and watching +the movements of the one threatening the peace of his household. If the +observer approaches nearer the nest the male will begin to fly at him in a +straight course, turning upward abruptly with a loud whiff of wings when it +stems that the disturber must certainly be struck by the determined defender of +his home. The nest may still be more than a hundred yards beyond the +observer. In the majority of instances it lies ahead in the line the male points +in his flight. As the disturber gets nearer, the male shows more distress and +flutters wildly overhead, flying at the disturber from every direction, though not +from long distances as before. All the while the female is sitting unconcerned +on her eggs, indifferent to the angry and distressed cackling of her spouse. +Perhaps by this time a half dozen or more other males have joined in the +outcry, and frequently one of these allies will try to mislead the disturber.</p> + +<p>The female sits very closely upon her eggs, flattening herself upon them in +such a manner that she resembles a dead chicken lying on the ground. When +flushed from the nest she will fly low for 30 or 40 feet or flutter from the nest +and run awkwardly for a short distance, feigning to be crippled. Frequently +she will lower her head, with bill almost touching the ground, and run along +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_101">[Pg 101]</span>in a shamefaced manner. Before the nest is discovered the males who are +aiding to mislead the observer will sometimes act in this shamefaced way.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—Four eggs are ordinarily laid by the long-billed curlew, +occasionally five; as many as eight have been found in a nest, evidently +the product of two females. The eggs vary in shape from +ovate to short ovate or ovate pyriform, sometimes quite rounded; and +they have a slight gloss. The prevailing ground colors are in various +shades of “olive buff”; but some dark types are “ecru olive,” some +green types are “seafoam green” and some are as pale as buffy white. +The eggs are generally quite evenly spotted, some very thickly and +some very sparingly, with various shades of brown and olive, “Van-dyke +brown,” “bister,” “snuff brown,” “buffy brown,” and “buffy +olive,” with numerous underlying markings in various shades of +“brownish drab” and “drab gray.” A very handsome set has a +rich buff ground color, between “honey yellow” and “chamois,” +uniformly covered with small spots of rich browns, “Sudan brown” +to “russet.” The measurements of 68 eggs average 65 by 45.8 millimeters; +the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>72</b> by 48, 70 by +<b>48.5</b>, <b>56</b> by 43.5, and 62.5 by <b>42</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Incubation is said to be shared by both sexes; its exact +duration does not seem to be recorded, but for the European curlew +it is said to be 30 days. Both birds are certainly very solicitous in +the care of the young. We were too late for eggs in Saskatchewan, +but we found three broods of young. On June 1, 1905, we found two +small young curlews, hardly able to walk, in a grassy hollow in +the prairie; the old birds gave us a great exhibition of parental +solicitude, flying about, alighting on the ground near us and making +a great outcry. Their loud cries brought a third curlew which joined +in the chorus of whistling cries.</p> + +<p>When large enough to run, the young are adepts in the art of +hiding; they seem to disappear entirely, even in the short grass; +after hunting carefully for fully half an hour, over a limited area +where we had seen one vanish, we gave it up and walked away, when +we were surprised to see the youngster get up and run away from the +very spot we had been hunting hardest.</p> + +<p>Probably the mortality among young curlews is rather high, as +they have many enemies. All three of the broods we found contained +only two young. The parents have to work hard to preserve +even this average. We saw an interesting exhibition of parental +strategy one day, which probably succeeded in saving some young +curlews from the jaws of a prowling coyote. The curlew was decoying +the coyote away by feigning lameness, flopping along the +ground a few yards ahead of him, but always managing to barely +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_102">[Pg 102]</span>escape him. We watched them for some time until they finally disappeared +over a hill, fully half a mile from where we first saw them.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The young curlew, when first hatched, is completely +covered with long, thick, soft down. The color varies from “warm +buff” on the breast and flanks, to “cream buff” on the face, upper +parts and belly and to “cream color” on the throat; the crown is +even paler. The markings, which are brownish black in color, consist +of a broken and narrow median stripe on the forehead, irregular +spotting on the posterior part of the head and large, bold, irregular +spotting on the back, wings, and thighs. In older birds the bright +buffs fade to paler shades.</p> + +<p>I have seen no specimens showing the change from downy to +juvenal plumage. The latter is very much like that of the winter +adult, but it is somewhat more tawny, especially below, and the +streaks on the neck and breast are fewer and narrower. The first +winter plumage is apparently a continuation of the juvenal, subject +to some wear and fading, and with very little molting. By +spring young birds are practically indistinguishable from adults.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete postnuptial molt from August to November, +most of which is accomplished in September and October, including +the wings. The prenuptial molt, which involves the body +plumage, most of the scapulars, many wing coverts and the tail, is +prolonged through the spring, from February to June.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—On their breeding grounds, and to a large extent in their +winter quarters, these curlews are upland feeders, far out on the +open prairies, in the damp, grassy hollows, or about the edges of +prairie sloughs or ponds. But on migrations they are often seen +feeding on ocean beaches or about the shores of large lakes. I have +seen them on the beaches of southern California feeding at the surf +line in company with marbled godwits. They were wading out +into the retreating waves, picking up some small objects about an +inch long or less, probably mollusks. They seemed to experience +some difficulty in properly grasping the morsel with the tips of the +long mandibles, but when once started right they handled it very +skillfully, as the shell seemed to travel swiftly up the long bill and +into the mouth. They are said to probe in the soft sand to the full +extent of the long bill, but I did not see them do this.</p> + +<p>C. W. Wickersham (1902) has described the food and the feeding +habits of the long-billed curlew very well as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Crawfish, small crabs, snails, periwinkles, toads, worms, larvae, grasshoppers, +crickets, beetles, caterpillars when found on the ground, spiders, flies, +butterflies, and berries, especially dewberries, all play minor or major parts +in their diet. The worms, larvae, etc., are pulled out of the ground by the long +bill, the end of which may act as a finger having separate muscles to control it, +and often it is sunk into the ground as far as it will go to reach some unwilling +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_103">[Pg 103]</span>victim. The crustaceans are taken on the beach, or, discovered beneath the +surface by the probing bill, are pulled out and eaten. The berries are neatly +picked off the bushes, while butterflies and other insects are taken on the +wing.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Except on their breeding grounds, where they are +concerned in the welfare of their eggs or young, long-billed curlews +are exceedingly wary; when a flock is feeding, one or more birds +usually stand as sentinels, and at their cry of warning the whole +flock raise their wings and make off. Their flight is a bit erratic +or snipelike at first, but when well under way it is strong and steady. +While migrating or traveling for long distances they often fly high +in the air in wedge-shaped flocks, uttering occasionally their loud, +whistling notes. When alighting they drop nearly to the ground, +make a graceful upward sweep, and check their speed with a flash +of cinnamon wings. They walk gracefully and swiftly on land and +can swim if necessary.</p> + +<p>The night roosting habits are well described by Audubon (1840), +who saw them at their best in South Carolina. He writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The long-billed curlew spends the day in the sea marshes, from which it +returns at the approach of night to the sandy beaches of the seashores, where +it rests until dawn. As the sun sinks beneath the horizon the curlews rise +from their feeding grounds in small parties, seldom exceeding 15 or 20, and +more usually composed of only 5 or 6 individuals. The flocks enlarge, however, +as they proceed, and in the course of an hour or so the number of +birds that collect in the place selected for their nightly retreat sometimes +amounts to several thousands. As it was my good fortune to witness their +departures and arrivals, in the company of my friend, Bachman, I will here +describe them. The sun at length sunk beneath the water line that here +formed the horizon, and we saw the birds making their first appearance. +They were in small parties of 2, 3, or 5, and by no means shy. These seemed +to be the birds which we had observed near the salt marshes as we were on +our way. As the twilight became darker the number of curlews increased, +and the flocks approached in quicker succession until they appeared to form +a continuous procession, moving not in lines, one after another, but in an +extended mass, and with considerable regularity, at a height of not more +than 30 yards, the individuals being a few feet apart. Not a single note or +cry was heard as they advanced. They moved for 10 or more yards with +regular flappings, and then sailed for a few seconds, as is invariably the +mode of flight of this species, their long bills and legs stretched out to their +full extent. They flew directly toward their place of rest, called the “Bird +Banks,” and were seen to alight without performing any of the evolutions +which they exhibit when at their feeding places, for they had not been disturbed +that season. But when we followed them to the Bird Banks, which +are sandy islands of small extent, the moment they saw us land the congregated +flocks, probably amounting to several thousand individuals, all standing +close together, rose at once, performed a few evolutions in perfect silence, +and realighted as if with one accord on the extreme margins of the sand bank +close to tremendous breakers. It was now dark and we left the place, although +some flocks were still arriving. The next morning we returned a little before +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_104">[Pg 104]</span>day, but again as we landed they all rose a few yards in the air, separated +into numerous parties, and, dispersing in various directions, flew off toward +their feeding grounds, keeping low over the water until they reached the +shores, when they ascended to the height of about a hundred yards and soon +disappeared.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>A similar habit evidently prevails on the prairies, which Mr. +Wickersham (1902) describes very well as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>As evening falls he becomes restless, his hunting comes to an end, his bobbing +becomes more jerky and more and more repeated, until with a loud whistle +he jumps forward, his long wings fly out and up and with the first unsteadiness +over he joins the bunch in a long line and betakes his way with the others +toward some distant marsh or pond. On, on they go; the leader whistles, +the others answer, suddenly they all drop, sweep forward and up a little, and +then, with wings almost meeting above them and legs held daintily down to +break the shock, they all alight. For five minutes there is no movement, no +sound; there are no birds to be seen where, a moment before, the graceful +creatures had alighted; suddenly there is a little flutter of wings and before +you know it numerous forms have run forward and bent over the water to +noisily quench their thirst. For another five minutes there is as great a confusion +and clamor as formerly there was order and quiet; wings are fluttering, +hoarse, short cries are arising, feet are pattering up and down, the water is +heavily rippling from the motion of many bills, and, in a word, all is chaos. +One by one the drinkers cease, calmness is gradually restored, and, after pluming +themselves, the birds draw one leg up under them, tuck their head under +one wing, neatly fold the other, and sweet slumber reigns.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>On its behavior with other species Mr. Silloway (1900) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>There is another side to the disposition of the long-billed curlew, for this +spring I was once startled by an unusually piercing whistle, and looking upward +I saw a curlew swooping angrily upon a ferruginous roughleg that had chanced +to wander over the claimed domain of this pair of <i>Numenii</i>. Time and again +the curlew swooped upon the unoffending <i>Archibuteo</i> as the latter flapped +heavily along the edge of the coulee, and the cliff echoed with the shrill whistles +of the angry curlew. On the other hand, the long-billed curlews are the victims +of petty teasing by the longspurs which throng the prairie. I have repeatedly +noticed McCown’s longspur (<i>Rhynchophanes mccownii</i>) flutter up beside a +curlew, sailing upward, or attempt to strike the curlew, the latter on such +occasions seldom giving any attention to the petty annoyance mentioned.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>E. S. Cameron (1907) says that he has seen nesting curlews make +flying attacks at Swainson and marsh hawks, just as the European +curlews attack the jaegers.</p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—Long-billed curlews are noisy birds, especially on their +breeding grounds. I have recorded their ordinary notes of protest, +when near their nests or young, as loud musical whistles, like <i>quee-hee, +quee-hee, quee-hee</i>, sometimes prolonged into a long, rattling call, +<i>que-he-he-he-he-he</i>, loud and striking. Sometimes we heard a series +of somewhat guttural notes, or a melodious <i>coy, coy, coy</i>, somewhat +like the autumn gather call of the bobwhite. I have heard them in +Texas in the spring give rich, loud, musical notes as they flew, +<i>wheety, wheety, wheety</i>, very rapidly uttered, opening the bill with +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_105">[Pg 105]</span>each note. Our name “curlew” and the French “curlieu” are +probably both derived from one of the commonest and most characteristic +calls.</p> + +<p>P. A. Taverner (1926) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The commonest call note is a clear <i>pil-will</i>, so nearly like that of the willet +that it can not always be distinguished from it. Other notes resemble those of +the upland plover. One especially delightful is a long-drawn <i>curl-e-e-e-u-u-u</i>, +sparkling clear and rising in the middle about five notes, then dying gradually +away, lowering in scale and volume. The entire call lasts about three seconds +of time.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The long-billed curlew can be easily recognized by +its large size, long, curved bill, and cinnamon color. It is much +larger than the Hudsonian and much more cinnamon in color, especially +in the wings. It is much like the marbled godwit in color, but +its curved bill is easily distinguished from the straight bill of the +godwit.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—I quote again from Mr. Wickersham (1902) as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>July is spent in raising the chicks and by the middle or latter part of August, +all is ready for the flight south to Texas, Mexico, Florida, and the West Indies. +Then it is that we see them in great flocks of hundreds, bobbing up and down all +over the prairie, more nervous than ever; and then it is that they are least +wary at times and at other times so very wary that it is impossible to approach +them. They are so nervous and upset that they do not seem to know their own +mind and it is at that season of the year that their antics become almost as +ridiculous as they are just before the breeding season. The day comes when you +stroll out to take notes on the birds that you have seen by the hundreds the day +before only to find that they have disappeared; not a bird answers your call, no +hoarse screaming betokens your approach; they have gone, gone far away in +long <span class="sansserif">V</span>-like squadrons and, unless you follow them to their winter home in the +southland, you will not see their familiar forms for many months.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The long-billed curlew is now practically unknown in any of the +Eastern States, but it formerly appeared on the Atlantic coast about +the middle of July and in the Southern States in early August. It is +still quite common in California from the middle of July through +September. The main flight goes directly south to Texas and Mexico.</p> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—Although long since removed from the game-bird list, the +“sickle-bill” was a fine game bird. Its large size made it a tempting +target. It decoyed readily and could be easily whistled down by +imitating its notes. The cries of a wounded bird were sure to attract +others, which would circle around again and again until many were +killed. For these and other reasons it is well that the much-needed +protection came in time to save this fine bird from certain extermination.</p> + +<p>Dr. D. G. Elliot (1895) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Once when shooting in Florida, in the vicinity of St. Augustine, a large flock +of these birds passed overhead, and I brought down some by two shots from my +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_106">[Pg 106]</span>gun. Although naturally much alarmed, the survivors immediately returned to +their wounded companions, which were calling aloud as they lay upon the +marsh, flying over and around them, with hanging legs, and uttering answering +notes of sympathy, and approaching nearer and nearer until they were not many +feet above the ground. Repeated discharges of my gun failed for a time to drive +the unwounded birds from the vicinity, but as each individual fell from the +ranks, the rest would swoop toward it, and with much crying seem to urge it to +rise and follow them. The air was full of rapid-flying circling birds, each one +screaming its best, and it was not until a considerable number had fallen that +the remainder, convinced at length of the fruitlessness of their efforts, and the +danger present to themselves, departed for a more secure locality.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—The long-billed curlew is still quite common in Texas and +Mexico in winter. Mr. Wickersham (1902) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>After reaching its winter home, the curlew undergoes little change of habits +except in his relation to other birds. For a few days the big bunches stay +together and then they begin to separate into small bunches of from 2 to 20 +birds. It is rarely that a single one is seen entirely by himself but two or three +feeding together and then, perhaps a mile off, two or three more and in this +way scattered all over the pastures and prairies is the way we find them in +Texas. They are rarely found in the brush or even in ponds or swales +surrounded by the brush, but far out on the open prairie or in little mud flats +on the larger swales we rarely miss them. Here they feed all day looking for +almost any form of insectivorous or crustacean life.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North and Central America, accidental in the West Indies +and Newfoundland. Failure to accurately separate the different +curlews, particularly on the Atlantic seaboard, causes some uncertainty +regarding their general ranges, but <i>americanus</i> is evidently +now very rare east of the Mississippi River.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The long-billed curlew breeds (at least formerly) +north to British Columbia (150-mile House, probably Lac La +Hache, and Vernon); Alberta (near Calgary, probably Flagstaff, +and Walsh); Saskatchewan (Rush Lake and Quill Lake); Manitoba +(Shell River, Aweme, and Pilot Mound); North Dakota (Bathgate +and Argusville); and Wisconsin (Ceresco and Racine). East to +Wisconsin (Racine); Illinois (formerly Chicago); Iowa (Newton +and formerly Ferry); Kansas (Neosho Falls); Oklahoma (Camp +Supply and Ivanhoe Lake); and Texas (Houston, Corpus Christi, +and Brownsville). South to Texas (Brownsville, and Fort Davis); +New Mexico (Fort Sumner, Santa Rosa, Los Pinos, and Fort Wingate); +Arizona (Sulphur Springs); Utah (Fairfield, and Skull Valley); +Nevada (probably Franklin Lake, Humboldt River, and +Truckee Valley); and northern California (Pitt River, Butte Valley, +and Eagleville). West to California (Eagleville); Oregon (Fort +Klamath, Camp Harney, Haines and Dalles); Washington (Kiona, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_107">[Pg 107]</span>Yakima, and Wapato Lake); and British Columbia (Okanagan, +Vernon, and 150-mile houses).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range extends north to California (San +Rafael and Sacramento Valley); southern Arizona (Pima County); +rarely New Mexico (Demning, Santa Rosa, and Carlsbad); Texas +(Pecos, San Angelo, Clay County, and Victoria); Louisiana (Vermilion +Bay); and formerly South Carolina (Charleston). East to +formerly South Carolina (Charleston and Frogmore); Georgia +(Savannah, Sapelo Island, and Darien); and Florida (mouth of the +St. Johns River, Tarpon Springs, and Fort Myers). South to +Florida (Fort Myers); and rarely Guatemala (Duenas, and Chiapan). +West to rarely Guatemala (Chiapan); Oaxaca (Juchitan); +Jalisco (La Barca); Durango (Rancho Santriario); Lower California +(San Jose del Cabo, La Paz, Magdalena Bay, and San Quintin); +and California (San Diego, Owens Lake, San Joaquin Valley, +San Francisco, and San Rafael).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: North Carolina, +Corolla, April 15, Virginia, Chesapeake, April 15, and Locustvile, +April 16; District of Columbia, Washington, April 11; New +York, Montauk Point, April 28; Maine, Scarboro, May 2; Missouri, +Warrensburg, April 1, St. Louis, April 2, and Appleton City, April +3; Illinois, Mount Carmel, April 4, Quincy, April 10, and Canton, +April 15; Indiana, Liverpool, April 2; Iowa, Mitchell, April 3, +Ferry, April 13, and Coralville, April 15; Minnesota, Hallock, April +24; Oklahoma, Sentinel, April 5; Kansas, Emporia, April 9, and +Manhattan, April 13; Nebraska, Valentine, March 28, Long Pine, +March 29, Whitman, March 31, and Alda, April 3; South Dakota, +Vermilion, April 5, and Rapid City, April 10; North Dakota, Argusville, +April 8, Charlson, April 14, and Larimore, April 15; Manitoba, +Aweme, April 9, Margaret, May 2, and Killarney, May 4; Saskatchewan, +Eastend, April 16; Ravenscrag, April 28, Osler, May 7, and +Indian Head, May 9; Colorado, Springfield, April 3, Colorado +Springs, April 11, Denver, April 15, and Salida, April 29; Utah, +Salt Lake County, March 28, and Camp Floyd, April 12; Wyoming, +Sheridan, April 13, Cheyenne, April 15, and Jackson, April 18; +Idaho, Grangeville, March 14, and Neeley, March 15; Montana, Great +Falls, April 5, Terry, April 7, Corvallis, April 7, and Big Sandy, +April 13; Alberta, Provost, April 22, Veteran, May 2, and Flagstaff, +May 14; Oregon, Malheur Lake, March 28, Klamath Falls, March +28, Narrows, March 30, and Lawen, April 1; Washington, Prescott, +March 23, and Chelan, April 6; and British Columbia, Okanagan +Landing, March 29, and Osoyoos Lake, April 1.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_108">[Pg 108]</span></p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Florida, Palma Sola, May +11; North Carolina, Cape Hatteras, May 20, and Cape Lookout, +May 24; Maryland, Hail Point, May 23; Missouri, Corning, May 25; +Tepic, San Blas, April 28, and Los Penas Island, May 5; and +Lower California, Turtle Bay, April 14, and mouth of the Colorado +River, May 15.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of fall arrival are: Lower California, +San Quintin, July 4, and San Jose del Cabo, August 26; +Sonora, Altar, September 14; New Hampshire, Rye Beach, August +12; Massachusetts, Amesbury, July 21, Plymouth, August 9, and +Cape Cod, August 27; Rhode Island, Newport, July 15; New York, +Orient Point, July 9, and Long Beach, July 24; Maryland, Ocean +City, August 19; South Carolina, Frogmore, August 7, and Ladys +Island, August 9; Florida, Tarpon Springs, July 5; and Alabama, +Dauphin Island, August 21.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: British Columbia, Okanagan +Landing, October 29; Washington, Grays Harbor, October 7; +Oregon, Klamath Lake, November 19; Montana, Big Sandy, August +25, and Choteau, September 4; Idaho, Neeley, October 1; Utah, +Fillmore, November 19; Wyoming, Cheyenne, August 9, and Yellowstone +Park, August 22; Colorado, Denver, September 12, Yuma, +September 30, and Barr, October 22; Saskatchewan, Eastend, August +6, and Quill Lake, August 11; Manitoba, Westbourne Marsh, October +8 (Nash); South Dakota, Rapid City, August 3, and Hermosa, +August 15; Nebraska, Whitman, August 25, Valentine, September 1, +and Long Pine, September 6; Michigan, Washtenaw County, September +12, and Ann Arbor, September 15; Ohio, Cleveland, September +15; Missouri, Jasper County, October 15; Quebec, Montreal, +September 21; Massachusetts, Plum Island, September 2; Rhode +Island, Jamestown, September 9; New York, Fishers Island, September +10, and Montauk Point, September 12; New Jersey, Cape May, +September 14; and Virginia, Wallops Island, September 6, and +Cobb Island, September 25.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—As previously stated, the long-billed curlew is +now of casual or accidental occurrence east of the Mississippi River, +although it was formerly fairly plentiful on the Atlantic coast. +Macoun reports it as a rare emigrant in Newfoundland without +particulars, and in the lack of subsequent confirmation it seems +probable that he was misinformed. Preble (1908) records a specimen +that was taken several years previous in the vicinity of Fort +Simpson, Mackenzie. Several occurrences have been recorded for +Alaska, among which are: Bethel, five seen May 9, 1917, by J. J. +Brown (authority of A. H. Twitchell); a specimen, without date or +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_109">[Pg 109]</span>exact locality, recorded by Macoun; St. Michael, June 19, 1874 +(Turner); and upper Kuskokwim, July 23, 1898 (Hinckley). A +specimen also is reported as having been taken near Spanishtown, +Jamaica, in July, 1863.</p> + +<p>Other West Indian records for this species are considered indefinite +and probably refer to <i>N. hudsonicus</i>.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Utah: 41 records, April 1 to May 22; 21 records, +April 26 to May 9. Montana and Idaho: 24 records, April 20 to +July 4; 12 records, May 16 to 29. Saskatchewan: 11 records, May +3 to July 4; 6 records, May 23 to June 10. Washington and Oregon: +7 records, May 4 to 20.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="European"> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">NUMENIUS ARQUATA ARQUATA</span> <span class="smaller">(Linnaeus)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">EUROPEAN CURLEW</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The European curlew is said to have occurred once on Long Island, +N. Y., in 1853, and the specimen is still extant in the New York +State Museum. It was originally recorded as a long-billed curlew, +<i>Numenius longirostris</i>, but was identified by William Dutcher, who +recorded it in the <i>Auk</i> (1892). Its claim to a place in the American +list does not however rest on this ancient record, as E. Lehn Schiöler +says that it has also occurred both on the west and east coasts of +Greenland. The first record was that of Johan Petersen, who obtained +a young male on August 23, 1913, at Angmagsalik on the east +coast. Another was shot at Nanortalik in Julianehaab district in +1915 on the west side.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—Although great numbers of curlew are present throughout +the winter on the mud flats and low lying coasts and estuaries of +the British Isles, there is little doubt that the majority of our homebred +birds migrate southward, and this is confirmed by the fact +that when the breeding birds appear on the moors, the shore haunting +birds are still present in their haunts and remain for several weeks +longer. The average date of the arrival of the breeding stock in the +north of England is about mid February; Chapman has recorded +their arrival from February 5 to March 11, and in years of heavy +snowfall, such as 1886, they were unable to reach their nesting ground +till March 19. In mid Derbyshire they generally arrive early in +March.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—As William Farren (1910) remarks the watchfulness +of the curlew and the open nature of the country it frequents, make +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_110">[Pg 110]</span>observation of the courtship on the ground extremely difficult. False +nests or “scrapes” are almost invariably to be found in the neighborhood +of the nest, and O. R. Owen writes that in some parts of +Radnorshire, where the curlew breeds commonly, it is not unusual to +find two or three dozen “scrapes” in an afternoon. The curlews +arrive on the moors in flocks, which keep together for a week or so, +but soon resolve themselves into pairs. At this times, the moors +reecho with their songs. Mr. Farren describes it as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The performance, with its accompanying trilling song, resembles somewhat +that of the redshank. It rises from the ground and with rapid wing beats +ascends to a good height. Often when near the summit of its flight it checks +suddenly, almost throwing itself over backwards. Recovering, it hangs poised +kestrel-like in the air, and while so hovering, and also during a short temporary +drop on motionless wings, it pours forth the trilling or jodelling song. It rises +again on quivering wings and again sinks as before. This may continue for +some time or it may be varied by the bird circling round on extended wings, +when one is again reminded of the flight of a hawk. More often than not the +bird will stop before a circle is completed and hover again over a fresh spot. +So it continues, circling, rising, and falling, and pouring forth a joyful ripple +of song. The song consists of two—or three—rising notes, rapidly repeated, +high pitched, but liquid and flutelike. I would express the curlew’s song as +<i>gur-lech, gur-lech, gur-lech, gur-lech</i>, pronounced rather distinctly at first and +not too quickly, but quickening after the first two or three repetitions. Toward +the end the syllables must be almost run together, losing all of the first except +the “g” and at no time sounding the “ch” too hard but rather as in the +Scottish “loch.”</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Seton Gordon (1915) writes as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The singer, flying along the moor a few yards above the surface of the ground, +checks his flight and rises almost perpendicularly with wings rapidly beating the +air. On reaching a certain elevation he soars—glides rather—earthward in a +slanting direction, and it is now that his song is uttered. Commencing usually +in a couple of long-drawn whistles, uttered in a very low key, the song quickens, +the notes are sharper and clearer, and have at the middle of the performance a +curious, distinctive “break,” difficult to put into words. It is at this point that +the song is carried far across the moorland country, but almost at once the +key is lowered, the calls become more subdued, more drawn out, until they end, +as they commenced, in low, melancholy tones. Sometimes one sees a curlew +making his way across a moor and constantly fluttering up into the air. But +one imagines that there is something at fault, for time after time he utters only +the first note of his song and then almost at once mounts again into the heavens. +Can it be that he does not succeed in reaching the correct altitude from which +all self-respecting curlew commence their appeals to their adored ones? But +perhaps the songster is not producing that bottom note satisfactorily and thus +is doing his best to perfect it. It is, I believe, only the male birds that practice +these distinctive risings and dips in the air, but I can assert from personal +experience the hen also makes use of the trilling, tuneful notes which most +ornithologists associate only with the cock bird during the season of nesting.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The nesting sites are somewhat varied. Often the eggs +are laid in a slight hollow, lined with grass or sometimes sprigs of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_111">[Pg 111]</span>heather on moorlands among short or long heather; others will breed +among the long, wiry grass of high levels or on short-cropped pasture +lands. A tussock in the middle of a wet bog may be used, or, exceptionally, +the nest may be in a plowed field. There is not much effort +at concealment, but the sentry is generally on watch to warn the +sitting bird. Occasionally I have known a bird allow approach +within a few yards, and Mr. Fenwick records a case in which the +sitting bird allowed itself to be stroked and even lifted from the eggs. +As a rule, the bird leaves the nest long before the intruder comes +anywhere near. The nest is about 5 to 5½ inches across.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The eggs, which are normally four, are occasionally only +three or sometimes five. Of this latter number I have about a dozen +records. The only recorded case of six was probably due to two hens +laying together. The eggs are very large for the size of the bird, +pyriform in shape and very thin shelled, and are not laid on consecutive +days. In color they range from light green to olive green or +olive brown, spotted or sometimes blotched with light or dark umber +brown and ashy shellmarks. Exceptional varieties are pale greenish +blue or whitish grey, almost unmarked. The measurements of 100 +British eggs, made by the writer, average 67.6 by 47.9 millimeters; +the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>78.6</b> by <b>55.1</b>, <b>56.2</b> by 44, +and 61 by <b>43</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Incubation is carried on by both sexes, and the period is +29½ to 30 days. In spite of their long legs the young can run soon +after they are hatched, but remain in the nest longer than the young +of most waders, running out and concealing themselves on the approach +of danger. Both parents assist in looking after the young, +and only a single brood is raised in the season.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The plumages and molts are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds, edited by H. F. Witherby +(1920).</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—During the winter months the main food consists of marine +mollusca, such as cockles (<i>Cardium edule</i>), mussels (<i>Mytilus edulis</i>), +<i>Mya tellina</i>, <i>Bythenia</i>, etc.; also Crustacea, especially small crabs; +occasionally fishes from rock pools, such as <i>blennies</i> and Annelida +(lugworms). In the breeding season land Mollusca, such as snails +(<i>Helix aspersa</i>, <i>H. nemoralis</i>, etc.) and slugs; Amphitra (small +frogs), Annelida (earthworms). Insects, including Diptera and their +larvae (chiefly Tipulidae), Lepidoptera and their larvae, Orthoptera +(<i>Acheta</i>, <i>Forficula</i>), Rhyncota (<i>Notonecta</i>, etc.), and Coleoptera +(<i>Rhizotragus</i>, <i>Anisoplia</i>, <i>Dytiscus</i>, <i>Scarabicus</i>, <i>Aphodius</i>, <i>Harpalus</i>, +<i>Zabras</i>, <i>Pterostichus</i>, etc.). Also vegetable matter, seeds of <i>Polygonum</i> +and grasses, berries of crowberry (<i>Empetrum nigrum</i>) and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_112">[Pg 112]</span><i>Vaccinium myrtillus</i>; occasionally also blackberries. Fragments of +seaweed have also been found in the stomach.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The curlew is not popular with the shore shooter, as +he is not only exceptionally wary himself but seems to take a delight +in warning other and less suspicious species. Howard Saunders +says that he has seen a curlew, after shrieking wildly over the head +of a sleeping seal, swoop down and apparently flick with its wing the +unsuspecting animal upon which the stalker was just raising his +rifle.</p> + +<p>Although a bird of the coast and bare moorlands, it can and does +perch not infrequently on trees. In North Brabant, where it breeds +on the vast expanses of moorland with scattered belts of small pine +trees, I have seen an excited pair perched insecurely on the tips of +small trees and keeping up an unceasing succession of anxious yelping +notes while their young crouched in the heather below. Although +it usually wades, the curlew can on occasion take voluntarily to the +water and swims well.</p> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—Naumann mentions the peregrine and gyrfalcon, as +well as the goshawk among the enemies of this species. Saxby, J. F. +Peters, and others have found remains of curlew at the feeding places +of the peregrine; and Ussher also states that it is also the case in +Ireland.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—Early in July the young birds are on the wing on the English +moors and are already beginning to collect into packs, which +leave the breeding grounds about the middle of the month and resort +to the shore.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—Probably most of the birds which winter on the English +coasts are migrants from northern Europe. They chiefly haunt the +larger estuaries and the wide mud flats of the east coast, assembling +in flocks of fifty to a hundred. When their feeding grounds are +covered by the tide they will sometimes work inland, or may be +seen waiting for the water to recede on some isolated clump of rock +which commands a view in all directions, all facing the same way.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The British Isles, but only locally in England +in the midlands and southeast; also in the Orkneys and Shetlands; +but not in the Faroes. On the Continent, France (only in +Bretagne), Belgium, Holland, Germany, Denmark (Jutland), +Switzerland, Austria, Carinthia, Galicia, Rumania (Dobrogea), +Poland, the Baltic Republics, Sweden and Norway, Russia, and Finland +south to the Perm Government. In Asia it is replaced by an +eastern race (<i>N. arquata lineatus</i>), which ranges east to Japan.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_113">[Pg 113]</span></p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—Many winter in the British Isles, southern Europe +(the Mediterranean region), and a great part of Africa. Also in +small numbers to the Persian Gulf, but here it meets the eastern +form.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—At the Straits of Gibraltar the passage takes +place in March, but Irby saw a few late in April, while along the +Portuguese coast they pass from March to May. In the eastern +Mediterranean some leave Cyprus by the end of February, but +stragglers have been seen on March 30 and April 5 and others have +been seen on Crete at the end of April. In Iraq large flocks passed +Feluja between mid April and May 25, flying north in the evening.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Although long after the normal southward +migration the advent of hard weather will bring big flocks past Heligoland +flying west as late as November 19 to 20. The young birds +begin to arrive there as early as mid July from Scandinavia, and +on the Portuguese coast the passage lasts from late July to November +and at Tangier from September through October. At the Ionian +Isles and on Cyprus they arrive at the beginning of September, and +the passage through Greece lasts throughout September.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The records for Greenland and eastern America +have been mentioned. In Iceland Faber recorded the first on September +6, 1819, and since then other occurrences have taken place without +exact date. To the Faroes it is only a straggler in the winter +months. In the Canaries it is an occasional visitor, chiefly to the +eastern isles, and has been seen there as late as June 14. It has also +been recorded from the Azores, Madeira (December 7, 1893, October +25, 1896, October 28, 1896, January 30, 1897, and great numbers on +April 28, 1898) and the Cape Verde Islands.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—British Isles, April 17 to May 31 (42 dates), April +20 to May 10 (26 dates). Holland and Germany, earliest date April +6. Scandinavia from about mid May onward, May 13 to 26 (6 dates).</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Hudson"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">NUMENIUS HUDSONICUS</span> <span class="smaller">Latham</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">HUDSONIAN CURLEW</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>A striking case of the survival of the fittest is seen when we compare +the relative abundance of the three common species of North American +curlews to-day with their status 50 years ago. Whereas, at that +time the Hudsonian curlew was the rarest of the three, it is now by +far the commonest. The vast flocks of Eskimo curlew, that formerly +frequented the Labrador coast every summer and visited the New +England coast at frequent intervals, have all disappeared. They +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_114">[Pg 114]</span>were tame and unsuspicious, were easily decoyed, and were therefore +slaughtered in enormous numbers on their feeding grounds; +they made a long migratory flight over the ocean from Nova Scotia +to South America, where many undoubtedly perished in stormy +weather. The long-billed curlew, once so common all over the interior +prairie regions, and even on the Atlantic coast, has gradually been +driven westward and northward, until it is now occupying a comparatively +restricted range. The long-billed will probably be the +next of the curlews to disappear, perhaps within the near future. +But the Hudsonian curlew, on the other hand, has held its own, and in +some sections it has apparently increased. This increase, however, is +probably more apparent than real, due to comparison with other +species which are decreasing rapidly. The reasons for its success +in the struggle for existence are not hard to find. Its breeding +grounds are in the far north, where it is never disturbed; it has no +dangerous migration route; it does not ordinarily migrate in large +flocks, which are susceptible to vicissitudes of weather and great +slaughter at the hands of gunners; but, above all, it is a shy, wary, +wily bird, quite capable of taking care of itself and well fitted to +survive. Like the crow, it is more than a match for its enemies.</p> + +<p>The Hudsonian curlew was evidently comparatively rare in Audubon’s +time, for he apparently knew very little about it. Wilson seems +to have overlooked it entirely or to have confused it with the +Eskimo curlew, and Nuttall’s remarks are not altogether clear on +the subject. George H. Mackay (1892<i>b</i>) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Speaking for Nantucket and Tuckernuck Islands, as far as I am aware, not +over 15 or 20 of these birds a year on an average have been shot there +during the past 17 years, and the local saying, that “it does not pay to go +after them,” is true, they being too shy and too limited in number to make +it any object, either for gain or for pleasure. During these 17 years there +have never been more than 100 birds on an average living on the above +islands each year, and for the past few years I have noticed a falling off from +this number.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>I am quite sure that I have seen more Hudsonian curlews on Cape +Cod during the past 10 years that I saw during the previous 20. The +species certainly has not decreased, and I am inclined to think that +it has increased. The 1927 fall flight was unusually heavy.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—From its winter range on the Pacific coast of South +America this curlew migrates through Central America to Florida +and up the Atlantic coast. It reaches Florida during the latter half +of March, the Carolinas about the middle of April, and Massachusetts +about the middle of May. During a week spent with Arthur T. +Wayne on the South Carolina coast May 18 to 25, 1915, I saw the last +part of a heavy flight of Hudsonian curlews. Mr. Wayne told me +that the first birds come early in April, but the height of the migration +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_115">[Pg 115]</span>is between the third week in April and the second week in May, +when enormous numbers (he says hundreds of thousands) may be +seen every day. We saw no such numbers, but numerous flocks +were seen every morning flying in to feed on fiddler crabs on the +extensive marshes and flying out again at night to roost on the sand +bars and islands. They flew high in the air in <span class="sansserif">V</span>-shaped flocks +or in long irregular lines and their loud notes could be heard almost +constantly.</p> + +<p>Herbert K. Job (1905) saw them here in “scores of thousands”; +he spent a night at each of several little low islands—mere sand +bars—lying off the coast, and says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>About half past 5 or 6 o’clock, when the sun was low in the horizon or had +set behind a cloud bank, the first advancing line is seen, and a string of from a +dozen to 50 Hudsonian curlews come scaling over the beach, to alight on the +bar, down at the other end. After a few minutes another flock is seen approaching. +By half past 6 they are arriving fast, and by 7 there are two or +three flocks in sight all the time, some of them containing as many as 75 birds. +Meantime I am shooting at them as they pass, with my reflex camera, despite +the dull light. As may be imagined, the company on the sand has become immense, +covering many acres. They keep up a sort of murmuring noise, and +now and then all fly up, with a perfect storm and tumult of wings and voices, +soon to alight again. Even after dark they are yet arriving, as one may hear. +I hazard the guess that there are often 10,000 curlews at such a roost each +night. At the first glimmer of day they are off again for the marshes.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Wayne (1910) makes the following interesting suggestion:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This species supplanted the long-billed curlew between the years 1883 and +1885, for previous to these dates the former species was rare, but it gradually +became more abundant each year until it established itself firmly in great +numbers. The result was that the long-billed curlew was driven from its accustomed +range by a smaller species in the struggle for existence. The long-billed +curlews fed almost entirely upon fiddlers, and the Hudsonian curlew also subsisted +upon them, and as the food supply was inadequate, one species was +forced to seek other paths of migration.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The Hudsonian curlew seems to be a rare migrant everywhere in +the interior; some of my correspondents do not mention it at all and +others give only scattering records. But William I. Lyon writes to +me that he saw a flock of about 100 on May 22, 1926, in Illinois; +they were flying in <span class="sansserif">V</span> formation, uttering their characteristic four +short whistles, and breaking sometimes from a <span class="sansserif">V</span> into a line. Edwin +Beaupre tells me that “the foot of Amherst Island, in Lake Ontario, +is a favorite crossing place for these curlews in their northward +flight. May 24 is the date on which they may be looked for, passing +through this locality in one large flock.”</p> + +<p>J. A. Munro (1911) records a heavy flight which occurred at +Fisherman’s Island, Toronto, during three days, May 24 to 26, 1910; +a careful count was made of passing flocks in which over 1,000 birds +were recorded. Probably the main flight from the Atlantic coast +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</span>turns inland before it reaches New England and flies by way of the +Great Lakes to the west side of Hudson Bay. The species is rare in +New England in the spring.</p> + +<p>Along the Pacific coast there is a heavy migration; the main flight +appears in southern California about the middle of March, progresses +slowly northward, reaches Alaska about the middle of May, and arrives +on the breeding grounds in northern Mackenzie by the end of +May. In California the main migration route is coastwise, the bulk +of the flight coming in April; but John G. Tyler (1913) records +them as “regular spring migrants” in the interior valleys. “Their +favorite resorts are large, open fields where shallow ponds occur, +and in such places they often gather in large numbers.” D. E. +Brown’s notes record them as common, or very abundant at times, in +Washington, flocks of 40 or 50 birds being not at all uncommon; his +dates run from April 7 to May 14.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The best account of the nesting habits of this species and +its behavior on its breeding grounds is given us by Dr. Joseph Grinnell +(1900), who found eight nests in the Kotzebue Sound region of +northern Alaska; he writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I found the Hudsonian curlew to be a common breeding bird over the tundras +from Cape Blossom eastward into the Kowak Valley. In the vicinity of our +winter camp on the Kowak, the arrival of the curlews was on May 17. From +the middle to the last of June, in the Kowak delta, I became well acquainted +with the Hudsonian curlew. At this season they were of course mated and +most of them had eggs. They were ordinarily met with on the open stretches +of tundra, often where these alternate with strips of timber and lakes. Where +such perches are afforded, solitary birds on watch would be seen sitting on +the tips of isolated dwarfed spruces or even willow bushes. As soon as an +intruder entered the domains of a pair of curlew, the bird on watch would +give the alarm by a loud, ringing call note, and soon both birds would fly to +meet him. As long as the intruder remains in the vicinity, the pair of birds +keep flying restlessly to and fro, now and then alighting on the ground and +walking about, but most of the time keeping up their monotonous rolling +whistle. This was the only note I heard, except earlier in the season a long, +faint whistle like that of a distant locomotive, uttered by the male bird while +sailing slowly, on set motionless wings over the nesting grounds. This is +probably their song flight, though it is certainly very simple. The far-off +whistle, however, puzzled me for some time as to its origin. I at first thought +it was a steam launch on the river somewhere, until I finally connected the +sound with the slow soaring of the curlew overhead.</p> + +<p>The eggs so closely resemble the monotonous lights and shadows of the +surrounding moss and grass that I have stepped directly over the nest, all +the while scrutinizing every foot of the ground about me, without detecting +the eggs. Sometimes from the nature of the surroundings the eggs are more +conspicuous and can be seen 10 yards or more, but this is the exception. While +one is at the nest, the parents fly close about one, almost deafening one with +their loud penetrating cries. If anything the male bird is the most demonstrative +of the two. The nest is simply a saucer-shaped depression in the +top of a low hummock of moss or grass. The locality was always a wet +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_117">[Pg 117]</span>swale or low place in the tundra, in which the clumps of grass or moss were +often surrounded at their bases with water. The nests were in no way protected, +the eggs always being in plain view, but the remarkable mimicry in +their coloration is generally of sufficient protection.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>MacFarlane collected some 13 sets of eggs on the barren grounds +west of the lower Anderson River, but I find only one nest described +in his notes; this he said was “a depression in the ground, lined +with a few decayed leaves.” Stanton Warburton, Jr. took a set of +three eggs near Teller, Alaska, on July 4, 1924; he writes to me that +“the nest was situated on hard, dry tundra, the eggs occupying a +slight depression in light grasses; distinctive nesting material of +grey lichen-light material covered the cavity. Both birds were +present.” A nest found by Bishop J. O. Stringer on an island in the +lower Mackenzie River is described as a pile of grass, moss, and +weeds.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The Hudsonian curlew lays almost invariably four eggs, +though the set of three referred to above was heavily incubated. +The eggs are hardly, if at all, distinguishable from those of the +European whimbrel. They are ovate pyriform, rather pointed, in +shape and show little or no gloss. Doctor Grinnell (1900) describes +them as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Their ground color is very variable, from a bluish pea green through olive +buff to light olive green. The markings are numerous and somewhat amassed +at the larger ends of the eggs. They consist of dots, spots, and blotches of +pale lavender, drab, Prout’s brown, and bistre. The latter seems in every +case the real pigment, and the varying depth to which it is covered with +subsequent layers of shell material, seems to account for the different tints, +even to the palest lavender.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In the few sets that I have seen the prevailing ground colors are +dark and light shades of “olive buff,” with occasionally “Isabella +color” or “ecru olive.” In the markings I recognized various browns, +such as “bone brown,” “warm sepia,” “Saccardo’s umber,” “olive +brown,” and “buffy brown.” The measurements of 37 eggs average +57.5 by 40.7 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure +<b>61.9</b> by 41.7, 59.2 by <b>43.2</b>, <b>52</b> by 38.5, and 55 by <b>37.2</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—I have never seen a downy young Hudsonian curlew, +and, so far as I know, it has never been described. Young birds are +in juvenal plumage when they reach us on migration. They are more +easily recognized by their much shorter bills than by any plumage +differences, as they look much like adults. The markings on the neck +and breast are finer and closer; the feathers of the back, scapulars, +tertials, and wing coverts are “warm sepia,” notched with cream-white +or pale buff, producing a spotted effect, most pronounced on the +wing coverts and tertials (in adults these parts are more narrowly +edged with buff); the rump is “sepia,” with large spots of “pinkish +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_118">[Pg 118]</span>buff,” and the upper tail coverts are barred with the same colors; the +under parts are more buffy than in adults and the whole effect is +brighter and more variegated.</p> + +<p>A postjuvenal body molt in late fall or early winter, which almost +runs into a first prenuptial molt, produces a plumage, which can be +distinguished from the adult only by the faded juvenal wing coverts +and the bird becomes fully adult at the next postnuptial molt.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete postnuptial molt, beginning with the body +molt in August and ending with the molt of the primaries in the winter; +soon after the wings are molted, or from February to May they +have a partial prenuptial molt, including the body plumage, the tail, +and some of the scapulars and wing coverts.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Hudsonian curlews are mainly shore feeders; on the +beaches and sand flats they pick up various insects, worms, small +mollusks, and crustaceans, often probing for the sand fleas in the wet +sand; on the mud flats they find similar animal food. I have also +often seen them on the marshes, or even on high, dry pasture lands, +such as are frequented by golden plover and Eskimo curlews, where +they find grasshoppers, spiders, beetles, and other insects. In South +Carolina we saw them at low tide on the oyster banks and on the mud +banks riddled with holes of fiddler crabs, on which they were doubtless +feeding. In the Magdalen Islands I have seen them on the +uplands and among the sand dunes, where they were evidently eating +crow berries (<i>Empetrum nigrum</i>). They are also said to eat blueberries, +dewberries, and various seeds. E. W. Hadeler tells me that +he once saw them feeding on the bodies of light-colored millers; the +beach was lined with these moths, some dead and others alive, and +the curlews did not like to leave this abundant supply of food.</p> + +<p>Mr. Mackay (1892<i>b</i>) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They feed on fiddler crabs, grasshoppers, and the large gray sand spiders +(<i>Lycosa</i>) which live in holes in the sand among the beach grass adjacent to +headlands, huckleberries, which they pick from the bushes, and beetles (<i>Lachnosterna</i>, +<i>Scarabaeidae</i>), all of which are usually mixed with coarse gravel. +When a flock of these birds is on the ground where they have been feeding they +become scattered, 25 or 30 birds covering 15 or 20 yards’ space. At such times +they do not appear to be particularly active, moving about in a rather slow, +stately manner, although I have once in a while seen them run.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>L. L. Jewel (1913) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>One of the bird surprises of my life was to see a Hudsonian curlew tiptoe and +catch butterflies within 20 feet of my front door at Gatun. The clearings in and +around the town seemed very attractive to these birds and they were fairly +tame. Marching or advancing by rushes, always with graceful dignity, sometimes +singly but more often in groups of four or five, they foraged through the +shorter grass, picking up or catching on the wing their insect food. They +usually kept near the water’s edge or well down in dry gullies, but also fed on +higher ground at times.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_119">[Pg 119]</span></p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Although Hudsonian curlews may fly swiftly at times +and probably make good speed when traveling they appear to me to +fly rather slowly and heavily, with steady and rather moderate wing +beats; they often set their wings and scale for a long distance. When +migrating over land they usually fly high, in flocks, much after the +manner of ducks and geese; but when migrating over water or flying +to and from their roosting grounds they often fly in long lines close +to the water. Their flight has been said to resemble the flight of +gulls when moving in flocks, or to suggest that of herons when flying +close to the water, but I could never see any such resemblance.</p> + +<p>Dr. Charles W. Townsend (1905) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They walk and run rapidly, stand still, often with one foot several inches in +front of the other, rest occasionally by squatting down, with tarsi flat on the +ground, or standing upon one leg, with the other out behind.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>William L. Dawson (1923) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The curlews deploy, then, upon the dry sands of the upper beach and either +potter about on listless lookout for passing insects or else squat upon the sand, +tuck bill under wing, and lose themselves in dreams. There is always at least +one wary fellow on guard, however, and let but the smallest appearance of +motion, be it only a khaki hat, break the purity of the sky line among the +attendant sand dunes, and a quaver of warning puts the scattered flock on +guard. Sleepy heads are stealthily withdrawn; the birds rise slowly and +begin to creep toward their leader, their neutral-colored bodies scarcely distinguishable +against the background of sand; and all meanwhile scanning +the horizon for the danger sign. If the alarm spreads, all run down the +beach slope for a quick take-off, pass over the surf line, and then parallel +the shore with moderate, firm wing strokes until a safe distance has been +reached.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—John T. Nichols says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The flight note of the Hudsonian curlew in migration resembles somewhat +that of the greater yellowlegs, but is easily distinguished therefrom, being less +modulated and usually lower pitched. It commonly consists of four short +whistles, but is frequently prolonged, sometimes accelerated into a trill. The +more prolonged calls are usually the dryer and seem characteristic of the +noisiest birds, flying highest or with most uncertainty. On its northern breeding +grounds (Nome, July, 1926) this species keeps up a continual vocal protest +while an intruder is present. Its note then matches in form the trills which +may be heard in migration but is much more musical and varied in quality. +It may be described as polysyllabic, rolling, usually 10 syllabled or less; modulated +and varied in tone—loud, reedy, sweet, mellow, or liquid. It is the same +when the bird is in the air as when it is on the ground.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Mackay (1892<i>b</i>) says that the rolling note sounds like “that +produced by a boy’s lead bird whistle filled with water.” They also +have a soft, musical <i>cur-lew</i> note, more often heard in the spring. +Dr. E. R. P. Janvrin says in his notes: “The note uttered during +flight, usually just after the birds are put up and apparently an +alarm note, sounds like <i>krek, krek, krek</i>, quite loud and rather +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_120">[Pg 120]</span>metallic.” E. W. Hadeler refers to this note as <i>pip, pip</i>, uttered five +or six times in rapid succession.</p> + +<p>John G. Tyler (1913) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>There are no birds with which I am acquainted that can compare with these +splendid waders in the rich, musical quality of their voices. On the last day +of one April I encountered a large flock of curlews in a grain field, part of +which was being flooded at the time with irrigation water. The nervous +lispings that at my approach threatened to break into the clamorous, screaming +flight calls finally subsided, and the birds fed and waded about in the water +or preened their feathers while standing storklike on one leg. Suddenly I +was thrilled with a medley of subdued pipings so marvelously sweet and +musical that I could hardly believe the sound came from my flock of curlews. +The faintest whispering it seemed, yet the liquid melody was really far-reaching +and was, as I afterwards learned, distinctly audible from a distance +of a quarter of a mile when atmospheric conditions were favorable. A strange +nervous unrest seemed to affect the entire group on the ground. The whistlings +became louder, and the cause was suddenly revealed to me when a curlew call +from overhead drew my attention to a flock of new arrivals, nine in number, +that were circling preparatory to joining the company at the pond. My surprise +and admiration knew no bounds when I realized the sublime heights at which +these travelers through the sky had been flying. Mere specks they appeared, +and yet their melodious call rang clear and distinct.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—A large, rather pale brown bird with a long, decurved +bill can easily be recognized as a curlew; the long-billed +curlew is larger, has a longer bill, and is much more rufous or +cinnamon colored, especially in the wings; the Eskimo curlew is, or +was, smaller, with a shorter bill, though young Hudsonians have +rather short bills. Mr. Nichols suggests that at close range the much +barred under wing can frequently be noticed; the outer primaries +look blacker and plainer than in long-billed, and a white streak +near the edge of the wing, made by the primary quills, is cut off +abruptly at the base by a blackish blotch.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—Like most of the northern breeding shore birds, the Hudsonian +curlew moves off its breeding grounds as soon as the young +are able to shift for themselves, and begins its summer wanderings, +or starts on its southward migration early in July. There are two +main lines of flight, down the east and west coasts of the continent, +as well as a more scattering flight through the central valleys and +plains. The eastward flight is from the west coast of Hudson Bay, +where many birds linger through August, to the coasts of New England +and southward. A few Hudsonian curlews migrate as far east +as Labrador; the species has never been common there, but since +the disappearance of the Eskimo curlew it has been more in evidence; +Lucien M. Turner recorded it only twice in northern Ungava; a few +specimens have been taken on the east coast of Labrador.</p> + +<p>Adults appear on the coast of Massachusetts about the middle of +July and the young birds about a month later; the heaviest flights +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_121">[Pg 121]</span>come in August and September, but young birds often linger well +into October; my latest date is October 20. They reach the Carolinas +in July; Mr. Wayne (1910) says that he has seen them as +early as July 5 and not later than October 2. They are reported +as migrating over the Bermudas in August and September, but the +last of the birds do not leave the West Indies until November.</p> + +<p>Pacific coast flights occur on corresponding dates. Early in August, +when the blueberries and crowberries are ripening, large flocks +of this and bristle-thighed curlews come down to the Bering Sea +coast of Alaska, where large numbers are brought into the markets +at Nome all through August and early September. From there the +migration is southward along the Pacific coast. D. E. Brown’s +dates for Pierce County, Wash., run from August 6 to October 2, but +probably there are earlier dates. The earliest birds reach southern +California about the first week in July and the latest birds linger +through October. Meantime some of the birds have appeared in +Peru early in August and in Chile by the middle of that month.</p> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—The Hudsonian, or “jack,” curlew is a gamey bird, which +will test the skill and try the patience of the most experienced sportsman. +It is so shy and vigilant that it is difficult to outwit. It is +almost impossible to stalk an old bird, but I have, on rare occasions, +been able to creep up on a young bird. Most of my chances have +been at single birds flying over, when several gunners have been +spread over ground where scattered birds were feeding. Once a +flock of 15 birds swung by my blind within range, but they did not +alight to my decoys. Referring to the “good old days,” Mr. Mackay +(1892<i>b</i>) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They were apparently as shy then as now, for even then it was considered +essential in order to take them to mortise a hole in the ground for concealment +in the locality which they frequented or passed over, care being taken to remove +the soil taken out to some distance in a wagon in order that the place might +appear perfectly natural. Stands were dug in the center of a clump of bushes, +as being less noticeable. In times past, on Cape Cod, I have used a hogshead, +sunken level with the marsh, from which to shoot them, but even under +such conditions I never secured more than nine in one day, and that only once. +The Hudsonian curlew is a very observing bird and perceives at once anything +strange and out of harmony with the natural surroundings of any locality +which it has been in the habit of frequenting, and in order to get a flock up +to the decoys considerable care must be exercised. Single birds or pairs will, +however, decoy fairly well if they have not been harassed. These birds have +a way of setting their wings stationary and sailing, when headed for the decoys, +at a distance of 100 yards or more, the flock separating out so that there are +scarcely any two birds together, and then hanging, as it were, in the air. +During this time they are most carefully listening and scanning the decoys and +surroundings. A movement causes them to spring up in the air several feet, +and as this is generally when aim is being taken they are apt to be missed by +being undershot. In order to get them as near as possible I have frequently +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_122">[Pg 122]</span>set my decoys only a few feet to windward of my stand, as it is customary for +them, when heading for the decoys, to keep falling off to leeward of them. +They are not an easy bird to kill, being strong and powerful, and as the distance +is usually great at which they are shot at, owing to their vigilance, many +go off wounded and are not recovered. Should one or more be wing-broken +they frequently commence falling, which causes the remainder of the flock +to hover around for a short time, apparently to give encouragement to the +wounded ones, and while their attention is thus absorbed they will often afford +the sportsman a second shot, if he keeps concealed. Were it not for the satisfaction +of getting so shy a bird, for, as a rule, they are but indifferent eating, +there would be little inducement to waste the time necessary to obtain an +occasional one. I take a few every year by getting out of my wagon into some +place of concealment, when I observe a flock in the distance on the ground, +and letting my companion drive around the other side and start them toward +me. Long familiarity with the ground enables me to form some idea as to +what course they are likely to pursue, and I have obtained more or less in +this manner.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North and South America; accidental in Europe.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The Hudsonian curlew is known to breed only +on the Arctic coast of North America from Alaska (Norton Sound, +Kobuk River, Cape Blossom, and probably Camden Bay) to Mackenzie +(Anderson River region). It has, however, been noted in summer +in Keewatin (Fort Churchill and near York Factory) and may possibly +breed in that vicinity.</p> + +<p>In common with several other shore birds, some individuals remain +in summer far south of their breeding grounds. At this season they +have been detected from New Jersey (Great Bay), south along the +Atlantic coast—Virginia (Wreck Island, Bone Island, and Wallops +Island); South Carolina (Mount Pleasant); to Costa Rica (Coronado +de Terraba); and the West Indies (Barbuda).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range extends north probably to southern +California (Santa Cruz Island, Santa Barbara, and Ventura +County); probably rarely Louisiana; and rarely (formerly more +commonly) South Carolina (Bullyard Sound and probably Charleston). +East to formerly South Carolina (probably Charleston, Sea +Islands, and Frogmore); probably rarely Florida (Pine Island); +probably Cuba; probably rarely Porto Rico (Gundlach); the Lesser +Antilles (Barbuda); Guiana (Berbice River and Cayenne); Brazil +(Praia de Cajetuba); and Chile (Island of Chiloe). South to Chile +(Island of Chiloe). West to Chile (Island of Chiloe, Valdivia, Valparaiso, +and Tarapaca); Peru (Lima, Trujillo, and Tumbez); Ecuador +(Bay of Santa Elena); Galapagos Islands (Charles and Narborough +Islands); Venezuela (Isla de Aves); Costa Rica; Honduras +(Gulf of Fonseca); Guatemala (Chiapam); Clipperton Island; +Chiapas (San Benito); Jalisco (La Barca); Sinaloa (Mazatlan); +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_123">[Pg 123]</span>Lower California (La Paz, San Jose Island, San Francisco Island, +and Colorado River Delta); and probably southern California +(Santa Cruz Island). A specimen obtained at Rockaway Beach, +New York, on December 24, 1912, probably was either a crippled bird +or otherwise physically deficient.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: North Carolina, +Corolla, April 15, and Churchs Island, April 19; Virginia, Hog +Island, April 1, and Cape Charles, April 13; Pennsylvania, Renovo, +May 7; New Jersey, Cape May, April 12; New York, Montauk, April +28, and Shelter Island, May 9; Connecticut, Fairfield, May 6; Rhode +Island, Newport, April 27, and Block Island, May 3; Massachusetts, +Nantucket, April 10, and Muskeget Island, April 20; Ontario, +Brighton, May 7, and Toronto, May 17; Mackenzie, Fort Anderson, +May 29; northern California, Alameda, March 27, and Palo Alto, +March 28; Oregon, Newport, March 14; Washington, Hoquiam, April +19, and Everett, April 26; British Columbia, Comox, May 3, and +Courtenay, May 11; and Alaska, Craig, May 12, Nulato River, May +12, Hooper Bay, May 17, Kobuk River, May 17, and Fort Kenai, +May 18.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Chile, Concon, April 25; +Oaxaca, San Mateo, May 13; Florida, Palma Sola, May 11, and St. +Marks, May 19; Georgia, Savannah, May 13; South Carolina, Port +Royal, May 22, and Charleston, May 23; North Carolina, Pea and +Bodie Islands, May 8; Virginia, Locustville, May 27, and Alexandria, +May 30; Pennsylvania, Lancaster, May 27; New Jersey, Cape May, +May 23; New York, Long Beach, May 31, Canandaigua, June 1, and +Branchport, June 2; Connecticut, East Haven, June 4; Massachusetts, +Cape Cod, June 23, and Nantucket, June 25; Ohio, Youngstown, +May 24; Ontario, Point Pelee, May 30, Beaumaris, June 4, and +Brighton, June 10; Tepic, Las Penas Island, May 5; Lower California, +Colima Point, April 25, and San Jose del Cabo, May 1; California, +Santa Barbara, June 2; Oregon, Mercer, May 14, and +Yaquina Bay, May 18; Washington, Quillayute Needles, May 30, +and Dungeness Spit, June 3; and British Columbia, Courtenay, +May 23.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of fall arrival are: British Columbia, +Courtenay, June 27; Washington, Lake Ozette, July 12, and Destruction +Island, July 15; Oregon, Newport, July 10; California, Alameda, +July 7, Los Angeles, July 12, and Farallon Islands, July 16; Lower +California, Los Coronados Islands, August 7, and Santa Rosalia, +August 15; Peru, Chimbote, August 2; Ontario, Point Pelee, July +24; Ohio, Lake County, July 14; Massachusetts, Muskeget Island, +July 12, Monomoy Island, July 14, Marthas Vineyard, July 16, and +Boston, July 18; Rhode Island, Block Island, July 10, and South +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_124">[Pg 124]</span>Auburn, July 23; Connecticut, Milford, July 20, and North Haven, +July 26; New York, Rockaway, July 10, East Hampton, July 11, +and Orient, July 11; New Jersey, Tuckerton Bay, July 2, Long +Beach, July 9, and Cape May, July 15; Pennsylvania, Erie, August +1; Bermuda, August 14; Virginia, Chincoteague, August 1; North +Carolina, Pea and Bodie Islands, July 22; South Carolina, Charleston, +July 19; Georgia, Savannah, July 27; Alabama, Dauphin Island, +July 27; Florida, Bradenton, July 31, and Tarpon Springs, August +3; and West Indies, Barbuda, August 12.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Alaska, Craig, September 24, +and St. Lazaria Island, September 30; Mackenzie, Great Bear Lake, +September 30; British Columbia, Courtenay, October 5; Washington, +Clallam Bay, October 9, and Point Chehalis, October 19; Ontario, +Brighton, September 1; Quebec, Montreal, September 9; Nova Scotia, +Wolfville, September 13; Maine, Northeast Harbor, September 5; +Portland, September 9, and Dover, October 12; Massachusetts, +Monomoy Island, September 28, Harvard, October 2, and Dennis, +October 27; Rhode Island, Sakonnet Point, September 25, Rock +Island, September 28, and Newport, October 2; Connecticut, New +Haven, September 19, and North Haven, September 20; New York, +Montauk Light Station, September 28, and Orient Point, September +30; New Jersey, Sandy Hook, September 13; and Virginia, Wallops +Island, September 23, and Hog Island, November 10.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The Hudsonian curlew is of hardly more than +accidental occurrence in the interior but has been noted on a few +occasions. In addition to notes given under migration, mention may +be made of the following records: Colorado, a specimen at Colorado +Springs on September 23, 1900; New Mexico, a specimen at Fort +Thorn in the spring of 1854; Texas, Brownsville, several records in +spring between March 31 and May 24; Nebraska, Lincoln, October 8, +1898; Wisconsin, Milwaukee, September 9, 1903, and Cedar Grove, +September 23, 1922; Iowa, Crystal Lake, Hancock County, May 25, +1895; Michigan, St. Clair Flats, May 25, 1902, Saginaw City, fall +of 1896, and Forestville, April 23, 1906; and Indiana, Calumet +Heights, August 3, 1902. Reports exist for other interior States but +usually without satisfactory evidence.</p> + +<p>Both Macoun and Hagerup list it as occurring in Newfoundland, +but without any presentation of the evidence. In Porto Rico, Gundlach +reported collecting it at Punta Arenas, and also refers to a +specimen in a collection at San Juan, Stahl secured two others which +were preserved in his collection, F. A. Potts obtained one May 21, +1921, near Las Mareas, and observed others from July 31 to September +24, 1921, near Central Aguirre. According to Reinhardt +(1861), it has been taken on four occasions in Greenland (Godthaab, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_125">[Pg 125]</span>Julianehaab, Fiskenaesset, and Jacobshavn). A specimen was recorded +in 1854 by Kjärbölling from Iceland and one was taken near +Seville, Spain, May 3, 1872.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Alaska and Mackenzie: 11 records, May 31 to July +10; 6 records, June 14 to July 1.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Eskimo"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">NUMENIUS BOREALIS</span> <span class="smaller">(J. R. Forster)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">ESKIMO CURLEW</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The story of the Eskimo curlew is just one more pitiful tale of the +slaughter of the innocents. It is a sad fact that the countless swarms +of this fine bird and the passenger pigeon, which once swept across +our land on migrations, are gone forever, sacrificed to the insatiable +greed of man. “The Eskimo Curlew and its Disappearance,” by Prof. +Myron H. Swenk (1915), tells the story; it is well worth reading, +but space will permit only a few quotations from it. Edward H. +Forbush (1912 and 1925) also gives a very good account of the +tragedy. In some of the following paragraphs the reader will find +many references to its former abundance and the extent of the +slaughter which exterminated it. So we shall consider here only +the period of its rapid decline and some of the causes which produced +it.</p> + +<p>Professor Swenk (1915) says of its disappearance in the West:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In Texas the Eskimo curlew came in immense flocks on the prairies from +1856 to 1875, after which year the large flocks disappeared. Small flocks were +seen in 1886 and 1890. The last records of the species for Texas were 1902 and +1905, one and three individuals, respectively. The species were first definitely +recorded for Kansas from Russell County in 1874. In that State these curlews +were abundant as late as 1878, but in 1879 their numbers were much reduced +and the birds decreased rapidly. There were still a few in the Kansas markets +in the early nineties. The last record is for 1902. Eastwardly in the interior +the birds were always uncommon and disappeared early. The last Michigan +record is in 1883. The last Ohio record is in 1878. The last Wisconsin records +are April 27, 1899, and September 10, 1912, the latter specimen a male taken at +Fox Lake, Dodge County, Wis. The last Indiana record is, with some doubt, +April 19, 1890.</p> + +<p>The last records of collected birds for Nebraska were made in the spring +of 1911 and of 1915. On March 22, 1911, while Mr. Fred Geiger was shooting +ducks near Waco, York County, two of these birds came flying by within +gun range, and both were shot by him. The birds were identified by an old-time +hunter, and were then brought to Lincoln, and mounted by Mr. August +Eiche, in whose collection they are at present. Although no Eskimo curlews +were noted in 1914, a single bird was killed about 10 miles due south of Norfolk, +Nebr., on the morning of April 17, 1915. The bird was alone when taken. +It came into the possession of Mr. Hoagland, who had it mounted by Allabaugh, +a taxidermist of Omaha, in whose shop I saw it in May.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_126">[Pg 126]</span></p> + +<p>But this was not the last word from Nebraska, for 11 years later +Professor Swenk (1926) published the following encouraging note +of a sight record:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In further substantiation of the undoubtable fact that the Eskimo curlew +is not yet extinct, I am now able to cite a positive instance of its occurrence +in Nebraska during the present spring. On the morning of April 8, 1926, Mr. +A. M. Brooking, of Hastings, an ornithologist and taxidermist who is very +familiar with this species through having spent much effort in assembling +several specimens of it for his extensive collection, while driving from the +village of Inland to Hastings along what is known as the “north road,” +saw a flock of eight birds alight in a newly plowed field about 4 miles east +of Hastings. He drove his car up close to the birds, and when within 40 +yards of them was able to his astonishment to positively identify them as +unquestionably Eskimo curlews. Mr. Brooking knows the species so well, and +saw the birds so clearly, that in my opinion this sight record can be accepted +without hesitation.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>On the Labrador coast Eskimo curlews diminished rapidly in +numbers between 1870 and 1880. Hon. F. C. Berteau, a government +official in Labrador, in some notes published by W. J. Carroll (1910) +says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Up to 1889 dough-birds or Eskimo curlew were very numerous in Labrador +from late in August to the end of September. They frequented the southern +part of the coast only, never appearing north of Indian Harbor at the northern +entrance to Hamilton Inlet. During the first 4 or 5 of the 10 years during +which I was collector of customs on Labrador, they were very numerous, +indeed, flying from the hills to the shore and vice versa in flocks numbering +from fifty to two or three hundred. During the last years of my collectorship +they gradually diminished in numbers, until in 1890 or thereabouts they entirely +disappeared, and save for a few seen on one or two occasions have never +returned to the coast.</p> + +<p>The Hudson’s Bay Co. people at Cartwright annually put up large numbers of +hermetically sealed tins for the use of the company’s officials in London and +Montreal. I have seen as many as 2,000 birds hung up in their store as the +result of one day’s shooting by some 25 or 30 guns. A fairly accurate idea of +the plentifulness of these birds will be obtained from an account of my own +experience. During the season I used to leave the cruiser at 6 a. m. and return +at 9 for breakfast. I do not remember ever getting less than 30 to 40 brace +during the two hours or so that I was shooting.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Dr. Henry B. Bigelow (1902), who visited the northeast coast of +Labrador in 1900, heard of only about a dozen which were seen on +the coast that fall, of which he saw five. Dr. Charles W. Townsend +(1913) reported that seven were “shot and one other seen on the +beach at West Bay, north of Cartwright, in August and September, +1912. The skins of five were saved, and sent to Cambridge, where +they were seen and identified by Mr. William Brewster.”</p> + +<p>Excessive shooting of this curlew on its migrations and in its winter +home in South America was doubtless one of the chief causes of its +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_127">[Pg 127]</span>destruction. Ernest Gibson (1920) saw “some 20 or 30 * * * in +the vicinity of Linconia,” near Buenos Aires, on February 13, 1899; +and a small flock was reported in the same locality on April 8, 1901. +He evidently has seen none since then. Mr. Forbush (1925) has recently +given us the latest news from Argentina in a letter from Dr. Roberto +Dabbene, in which he writes that five or six were seen in the Province +of Buenos Aires on February 7, 1924; one of these was captured and +another solitary individual was taken at the same place on January +11, 1925; both of these specimens are in the Museo National de Historia +Natural, at Buenos Aires. These and the other recent records +may indicate that there are a few Eskimo curlews still living; but +the species is reduced to such a low ebb that it is doomed to speedy +extinction, if not already gone.</p> + +<p>One need not look far to find the cause which led to its destruction. +On its breeding grounds in the far north it was undisturbed by man. +And I can not believe that it was overtaken by any great catastrophe +at sea which could annihilate it; it was strong of wing and could +escape from or avoid severe storms; it could, like all shore birds, +swim if necessary; and its migration period was so extended that no +one storm could wipe it out. Several other species of shore birds +make similar, long ocean flights without apparent disaster. There is +no evidence of disease or failure of food supply. No, there was only +one cause, slaughter by human beings, slaughter in Labrador and +New England in summer and fall, slaughter in South America in +winter and slaughter, worst of all, from Texas to Canada in the +spring. The gentle birds ran the gauntlet all along the line and no +one lifted a finger to protect them until it was too late. They were +so gentle, so confiding, so full of sympathy for their fallen companions, +that in closely packed ranks they fell, easy victims of the +carnage.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—It was as a migrant only that we knew the Eskimo curlew. +As to how it reached the United States from southern South +America we know very little; but it probably followed the same route +taken by its companion the golden plover. It arrived in Texas early +in March and migrated northward through the prairie regions, +mainly west of the Mississippi River, through central Canada and +the Mackenzie region to the barren grounds on the Arctic coast. It +was rare in spring east of this narrow belt, and practically unknown +west of it. The flight through the United States was mainly accomplished +during April and through Canada in May, arriving on its +breeding grounds before the end of May.</p> + +<p>Professor Swenk (1915) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>As to the abundance of these birds in Nebraska during the early years of its +statehood the observations of Prof. Lawrence Bruner, who distinctly remembers +the flights which occurred in the vicinity of Omaha during the years 1866–1868, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_128">[Pg 128]</span>when he was a boy 10 or 12 years old, are indicative. The birds would arrive +about the time the later willows began to bloom (latter April), being present +in force for a week or 10 days only, for by the time all of the wild plum blossoms +had fallen (middle May) the birds were gone. Usually the heaviest flights occurred +coincident with the beginning of corn-planting time, and enormous flocks +of these birds would settle on the newly plowed fields and on the dry burnt-off +prairies, where they searched industriously for insects. These flocks reminded +the settlers of the flights of passenger pigeons and the curlews were given the +name of “prairie pigeons.” They contained thousands of individuals and would +often form dense masses of birds extending for a quarter to a half mile in +length and a hundred yards or more in width. When the flock would alight the +birds would cover 40 or 50 acres of ground.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Dr. E. W. Nelson (1887) called this “the most abundant curlew in +northern Alaska, especially along the coasts of Bering Sea and Kotzebue +Sound.” At Saint Michael a number were seen passing north on +May 12, 1878. He says that they were “always more numerous than +<i>hudsonicus</i>, and sometimes flocks of 150 or more” were seen. But +Dr. Joseph Grinnell (1900) looked for it in vain about Kotzebue +Sound.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—For all that we know about the nesting habits of the +Eskimo curlew, we are indebted to Roderick MacFarlane, who found +this species breeding abundantly on the barren grounds east of Fort +Anderson and up to the Arctic coast. He collected some 30 sets of +eggs there between 1862 and 1866. He says in his notes that “this +curlew never, in this quarter at least, breeds in wooded tracts, the +barren grounds proper being the real habitat of the species during +the season of nidification.” It is “very difficult to find the nests” as +the birds “get off long before our approach, while the eggs nearly +resemble the grass in color.” Some birds were seen to leave the +nests. The nests are described as mere hollows in the ground, “lined +with a few decayed leaves” and sometimes having “a thin sprinkling +of hay.” The birds “generally ascend in the air in a straight +line after getting off the nest.”</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The normal set was evidently four eggs, but MacFarlane +sent home several sets of three. The eggs are rather pointed ovate +in shape and have very little gloss. Many eggs closely resemble +certain types of Franklin gull’s eggs. The ground colors vary from +browns to olives, the latter predominating. The olive colors run +from “buffy olive” or “citrine drab” to “olive buff,” and the brown +colors from “light brownish olive” to “buckthorn brown.” Some +eggs are boldly marked with heavy blotches, which are sometimes +confluent about the larger end; more often they are irregularly +spotted and blotched; and some eggs are sparingly marked. The +markings are in dark browns, “bister,” “bone brown,” “buffy +brown,” and blackish brown, with underlying spots and blotches of +various shades of “brownish drab.” The measurements of 36 eggs +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_129">[Pg 129]</span>average 51.3 by 35.5 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes +measure <b>54.5</b> by 36, 52 by <b>39.5</b>, <b>47.5</b> by 36, and 51 by <b>33</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—There are not enough specimens of Eskimo curlews, +collected during the proper seasons, to work out the molts and plumages +satisfactorily. There are no specimens of downy young or very +young juvenals available. Young birds in juvenal plumage, as seen +on migration, are much like adults, but the feathers of the mantle, +scapulars, tertials, and wing coverts are more broadly edged, but +less conspicuously notched, with “pinkish buff”; and the under parts +are less extensively covered with the dusky markings.</p> + +<p>The postnuptial molt of adults is mainly accomplished after they +have left us in the fall, beginning in September; the wings are +probably molted after the birds have reached their winter home. +There is a prenuptial molt of the body plumage, visible during +the spring migration, the new feathers, being more pinkish buff, +especially on the under parts.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Professor Swenk (1915) says of its food habits in the +west:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The Eskimo curlew was a bird of such food habits that it is a distinct loss +to our agriculture that it should have disappeared. During the invasion of +the Rocky Mountain grasshopper (<i>Melanoplus spretus</i>) it did splendid work +in the destruction of grasshoppers and their eggs. Mr. Wheeler states that +in the latter seventies these birds would congregate on pieces of land which +had not been plowed and where the grasshopper eggs were laid, reach down +into the soil with their long bills, and drag out the egg capsules, which they +would then devour with their contents of eggs or young hoppers until the +land had been cleared of the pests. A specimen examined by Aughey in +1874 had 31 grasshoppers in its stomach, together with a large number of +small berries of some kind. The bird in its migrations often alighted on +plowed ground to feed on the white grubs and cutworms turned up by the +plow, or in meadow lands, probably feeding on ants in the latter situation. +Richardson records finding them feeding on large ants at Fort Franklin in +late May, 1849. The curlews were rarely seen near water, but were upland +birds almost exclusively during the spring migration over the Great Plains +region.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Doctor Coues (1874) describes its food on the Labrador coast, as +follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Their food consists almost entirely of the crowberry (<i>Empetrum nigrum</i>), +which grows on all the hillsides in astonishing profusion. It is also called the +“bearberry” and “curlew berry.” It is a small berry, of a deep purple color, +almost black, growing upon a procumbent, running kind of heath, the foliage +of which has a peculiar moss-like appearance. This is their principal and +favorite food and the whole intestine, the vent, the legs, the bill, throat, and +even the plumage, are more or less stained with the deep purple juice. They +are also very fond of a species of small snail that adheres to the rock in +immense quantities, to procure which they frequent the land-washes at low +tide. Food being so abundant, and so easily obtained, they become excessively +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_130">[Pg 130]</span>fat. In this condition they are most delicious eating, being tender, juicy, and +finely flavored; but, as might be expected, they prove a very difficult job for +the taxidermist.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Lucien M. Turner gives, in his Ungava notes, a vivid +description of a large flock of Eskimo curlews, which I quote, as +follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I saw none until the morning of the 4th of September, 1884, as we were passing +out from the mouth of the Koksoak River. Here an immense flock of +several hundred individuals were making their way to the south. They flew +in that peculiar manner which distinguishes the curlews from all other birds +in flight, a sort of wedge shape, the sides of which were constantly swaying +back and forth like a cloud of smoke wafted by the lightest zephyr. The +aerial evolutions of the curlews when migrating are, perhaps, one of the most +wonderful in the flight of birds. Long, dangling lines, either perpendicular or +horizontal, the lower parts of which whirl, rise, or twist spirally, while the +apex of the flock is seemingly at rest. At other times the leader plunges downward +successively followed by the remainder in most graceful undulations, becoming +a dense mass then separating into a thin sheet spread wide; again +reforming into such a variety of positions that no description would suffice.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Mackay (1892<i>c</i>) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Of those I have observed in New England during a series of years I may +say that most of their habits closely resemble those of the golden plover. In +migration they fly in much the same manner, with extended and broadside and +triangular lines and clusters similar to those of ducks and geese at such +times. They usually fly low after landing, sweeping slowly over the ground, +apparently looking it over, generally standing motionless for quite a little while +after alighting, which, owing to their general color approximating so closely +to the withered grass, renders it difficult at times to perceive them. I have had +a flock of 50 or 60 alight within 30 yards of me, and have been unable to make +out more than two or three birds. If disturbed they will frequently alight again +at no great distance, if not previously harassed, and under the same conditions +they can be approached at all times, for they are either very tame or very +shy. They seek out and are found in the same localities selected by the golden +plover with which they generally associate if any are in the vicinity, there +always being a strong friendship between them. They are not so active as +the plover; on the ground they appear less inclined to move about, especially +after landing and during rainy weather when I have at times noticed them +standing on the ground quite close together, every bird headed to the wind, +with heads and necks drawn down and resting on their backs, with the rain +running off their tails. At such times they could be approached on foot to +within half a gunshot, showing little fear.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Doctor Coues (1874) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The curlews associate in flocks of every size, from three to as many thousand, +but they generally fly in so loose and straggling a manner that it is rare to +kill more than half a dozen at a shot. When they wheel, however, in any of +their many beautiful evolutions, they close together in a more compact body, +and offer a more favorable opportunity to the gunner. Their flight is firm, +direct, very swift, when necessary much protracted, and is performed with +regular, rapid beats. They never sail, except when about to alight, when the +wings are much incurved downward, in the manner of most waders. As their +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_131">[Pg 131]</span>feet touch the ground, their long, pointed wings are raised over the back, until +the tips almost touch, and then deliberately folded, much in the manner of the +solitary sandpiper (<i>Rhyacophilus solitarius</i>).</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—Professor Swenk (1915) describes the notes as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The Eskimo curlew had several notes. During flight they uttered a fluttering +<i>tr-tr-tr</i> note, which was given by many individuals at once, and described by +Coues as a “low conversational chatter” and by Mackay as “a soft, melodious +whistle, ‘<i>bee, bee</i>.’” Mr. W. A. Elwood describes this note as “a short, low +whistle” continually repeated by many of the birds simultaneously while in +flight. Mr. A. J. Leach recalls the notes as resembling quite closely the note +of the bluebird when in flight, only perhaps shorter and more of a twittering +whistle, and, as it was given by a large number, perhaps all, of the flock as +they took wing and while flying, it was difficult to catch the individual note. +This note was constantly uttered while the birds were flying and was often +audible before the birds could be seen. Before alighting, as they descended +and sailed, they gave a soft whistle, somewhat like the note of the upland +plover, according to Professor Bruner, while as they walked over the ground +when feeding they uttered a chirruping whistle, as if calling to each other.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The adult birds must have started off their breeding grounds +early in July for the first arrivals reached the coast of Labrador +by the end of that month. Their course at first was east-southeast, +or perhaps nearly due east, across Hudson Bay to the Labrador +Peninsula, where they lingered for a week or two to feast and fatten +on the abundant harvest of berries. Turner saw them as far north +as the mouth of the Koksoak River, and says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>From the 10th to the 20th of August immense flocks of these birds appear +on the level tracts from Davis’ Inlet to the Gulf of St. Lawrence, each day +adding to their number until the ground seems alive with them. They feed +on the ripening berries of <i>Empetrum</i> and <i>Vaccinium</i>, becoming wonderfully fat +in a few days. By the 8th of September it is asserted that none remain.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Audubon (1840) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On the 29th of July, 1833, during a thick fog, the Esquimaux curlews made +their first appearance in Labrador, near the harbor of Bras d’Or. They +evidently came from the north, and arrived in such dense flocks as to remind +me of the passenger pigeons. The weather was extremely cold as well as +foggy. For more than a week we had been looking for them, as was every +fisherman in the harbor, these birds being considered there, as indeed they are, +great delicacies. The birds at length came, flock after flock, passed close round +our vessel, and directed their course toward the sterile mountainous tracts +in the neighborhood; and as soon as the sun’s rays had dispersed the fogs +that hung over the land, our whole party went off in search of them.</p> + +<p>I was not long in discovering that their stay on this coast was occasioned +solely by the density of the mists and the heavy gales that already gave +intimation of the approaching close of the summer; for whenever the weather +cleared up a little, thousands of them set off and steered in a straight course +across the broad Gulf of St. Lawrence. On the contrary, when the wind was +high, and the fogs thick, they flew swiftly and low over the rocky surface of +the country, as if bewildered. Wherever there was a spot that seemed likely +to afford a supply of food, there the curlews abounded, and were easily +approached. By the 12th of August, however, they had all left the country.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_132">[Pg 132]</span></p> + +<p>The eastward flight reached as far as Newfoundland, where they +were fairly numerous along the eastern and southeastern shores. +There was also a migration, probably down the west coast of Hudson +Bay, which reached the Atlantic coast through Ontario and the +Great Lakes region. But the main flight was through Labrador, +across the Gulf of St. Lawrence to Nova Scotia and then due south +across the ocean to the Lesser Antilles and South America; their +course in South America is not well known, but it was probably +across eastern Brazil, to Uruguay, Argentina, and Patagonia, where +they arrived in September.</p> + +<p>In fair weather the 2,000-mile trip across the ocean was probably +made in one continuous flight, though I believe that these birds +were able to alight on and rise from the water if necessary. But +if bad weather, severe southeasterly storms, thick fogs, or heavy rains +occurred during their passage, they were forced to land, sometimes +in enormous numbers on the coast of New England, less often on +the shores farther south, or on the Bermudas; if severe westerly +gales occurred they were sometimes driven far out to sea or even +across the Atlantic to the British Isles. Our flights in Massachusetts +could be looked for during the latter half of August and +through September. On Cape Cod they used to frequent much +the same localities as the golden plover, old fields and pastures, often +several miles from the shore, and the drier portions of the salt +marshes, where they found an abundance of grasshoppers, crickets, +and other insects; on Monomoy they were often found on the low +sand hills which were largely covered with gray mosses or lichens. +Mr. Mackay (1892<i>c</i>) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Those which do visit us almost invariably land with their boon companions, +the American golden plover, of whose flocks I have frequently noticed they +were the leaders, and I can scarcely call to mind, as I write, an instance where +any number of Eskimo curlew have landed without there being more or less +golden plover present at the same time. Those birds which may come can not, +if they would, remain any longer than is absolutely necessary, for they are +so harassed immediately after landing that the moment there occurs a change +in the weather favorable for migration they at once depart. They appear to +leave the coast at Long Island, N. Y., and strike farther out to sea, and then +are not seen on the Atlantic coast for another year.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—The gunner’s name for the Eskimo curlew was “dough-bird,” +not “doe-bird,” for it was so fat when it reached us in the +fall that its breast would often burst open when it fell to the +ground, and the thick layer of fat was so soft that it felt like a ball +of dough. It is no wonder that it was so popular as a game bird, for +it must have made a delicious morsel for the table. It was so tame +and unsuspicious and it flew in such dense flocks that it was easily +killed in large numbers. On the Labrador coasts and in Newfoundland +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_133">[Pg 133]</span>the inhabitants killed all they could and preserved them for +winter use, according to Mr. Berteau (Carroll, 1910), “by parboiling +them and packing them in tins and jars and covering them with +melted butter or lard.” Coues (1874) tells of shooting them in Labrador, +as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Although the curlews were in such vast numbers, I did not find them so +tame as might be expected and as I had been led to suppose by previous representations. +I was never able to walk openly within shooting distance of a +flock, though I was told it was often done. The most successful method of +obtaining them is to take such a position as they will probably fly over in +passing from one feeding ground to another. They may then be shot with +ease, as they rarely fly high at such times. The pertinacity with which they +cling to certain feeding grounds, even when much molested, I saw strikingly +illustrated on one occasion. The tide was rising and about to flood a muddy +flat, of perhaps an acre in extent, where their favorite snails were in great +quantities. Although six or eight gunners were stationed upon the spot, and +kept up a continual round of firing upon the poor birds, they continued to +fly distractedly about over our heads, notwithstanding the numbers that +every moment fell. They seemed in terror lest they should lose their accustomed +fare of snails that day. On another occasion, when the birds had been +so harassed for several hours as to deprive them of all opportunity of feeding, +great numbers of them retired to a very small island, or rather a large pile +of rocks, a few hundred yards from the shore, covered with seaweed and, of +course, with snails. Flock after flock alighted on it, till it was completely +covered with the birds, which there, in perfect safety, obtained their morning +meal.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>I can remember hearing my father tell of the great shooting they +used to have on “the plains” at Cohasset when I was a small boy, +about 1870. As he has now gone to the happy hunting grounds I +can not give the exact figures, but he saw a wagon loaded full of +“dough birds” shot on the plains in one day.</p> + +<p>The greatest killings were made on the western plains during the +spring migration, which Professor Swenk (1915) describes as +follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>During such flights the slaughter of these poor birds was appalling and +almost unbelievable. Hunters would drive out from Omaha and shoot the +birds without mercy until they had literally slaughtered a wagonload of them, +the wagons being actually filled, and often with the sideboards on at that. +Sometimes when the flight was unusually heavy and the hunters were well +supplied with ammunition their wagons were too quickly and easily filled, so +whole loads of the birds would be dumped on the prairie, their bodies forming +piles as large as a couple of tons of coal, where they would be allowed to rot +while the hunters proceeded to refill their wagons with fresh victims, and thus +further gratify their lust of killing. The compact flocks and tameness of the +birds made this slaughter possible, and at each shot usually dozens of the birds +would fall. In one specific instance a single shot from an old muzzle-loading +shotgun into a flock of these curlews as they veered by the hunter brought down +28 birds at once, while for the next half mile every now and then a fatally +wounded bird would drop to the ground dead. So dense were the flocks when +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_134">[Pg 134]</span>the birds were turning in their flight that one could scarcely throw a brick or +missile into it without striking a bird.</p> + +<p>In hunting these curlew the field glass was used by the hunters to follow +their flights. The fields where they were prone to gather were patroled many +times during the day and carefully scanned with the glass to discover the +flocks on the ground. When the birds came in they would be up quite high, +perhaps from 200 or 300 yards to a quarter of a mile, and in preparing to alight +they would turn and wheel, towering in the air while they whistled softly, +would hover a while, and then all drop and come down, flying along over the +ground for a short distance before alighting. The birds would always alight +all at once and very close together, and if the day were warm they would sit +down very close together on the ground, forming bunches, when they could be +readily discovered with the field glass and approached close enough to get +a shot.</p> + +<p>There was no difficulty in getting quite close to the sitting birds, perhaps +within 25 or 35 yards, and when at about this distance the hunters would wait +for them to arise on their feet, which was the signal for the first volley of shots. +The startled birds would rise and circle about the field a few times, affording +ample opportunity for further murderous discharge of the guns, and sometimes +would realight on the same field, when the attack would be repeated. +Mr. Wheeler has killed as many as 37 birds with a pump gun at one rise. They +weighed just about 1 pound each when they were fat. Sometimes the bunch +would be seen with the glass alighting in a field 2 or 3 miles away, when the +hunters would at once drive to that field with a horse and buggy as rapidly as +they could, relocate the birds, get out, and resume the fusillade and slaughter. +On rainy days the birds would fly restlessly from one field to another, moving +about in this way most of the day and seeming unusually plentiful because of +being so much in the air.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—There is little known about the winter habits of the +Eskimo curlew except that it formerly associated with the golden +plover, the upland plover, and the buff-breasted sandpiper on the +pampas of Argentina and Patagonia, where it is now but a memory +of the past.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North and South America, accidental in eastern Asia +and Great Britain.</p> + +<p>The Eskimo curlew is now nearly or quite extinct. Although +formerly abundant, its occurrence in both North and South America +has been so frequently confused with <i>Numenius hudsonicus</i>, that it +is extremely difficult to establish its migration range. Like the +golden plover, however, this species followed an elliptical route, +usually passing south in the fall off the coast of the United States, +the point of departure from the mainland being the coast of Labrador, +Nova Scotia, or (more rarely) Long Island, New York. In +spring the return trip was made up the Mississippi Valley and the +prairie States at which season it was practically unknown on the +Atlantic coast.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_135">[Pg 135]</span></p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The only known nests and eggs of the Eskimo +curlew have been obtained in northwestern Canada, Fort Anderson, +Rendezvous Lake, Franklin Bay, and Point Lake.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The northern limits of the winter range are not +known, but probably extended rarely to Brazil (Ypanema). South +to Uruguay (Montevideo); Argentina (Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, +Concepcion, and the Chupat Valley); and Chile (Island of Chiloe, +and Paposo). It also has been detected on the Falkland Islands +(Abbott, 1861).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival in North +America are: Texas, Gainesville, March 7, and Boerne, March 9; +Arkansas, Fayetteville, March 31; Missouri, St. Louis, April 10, +and Vernon County, April 16; Kansas, Emporia, April 13; Nebraska, +Alda, April 2; Iowa, Burlington, April 5, and Grinnell, +April 10; South Dakota, Brown County, April 16, and Mackenzie, +Fort Resolution, May 26, and Fort Anderson, May 27.</p> + +<p>A specimen of this species was taken at San Geronimo, Guatemala, +in April; and one at Lake Palomas, Chihuahua, April 8, +1892. A specimen was taken at Chalmers, Ind., on April 19, 1890. +In Massachusetts one was obtained at Cape Cod in May, 1873, and +about 50 were reported near the mouth of the Rowley River, May +17, 1916. Spring arrivals also have been noted in Alaska, St. +Michael, May 12, 1878, and Cape Lisbourne, May 25, 1886.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Argentina, Concepcion, March +1; Texas, Long Point, April 23, and Fort Stockton, May 4; Missouri, +Jasper County, May 1; Kansas, Lawrence, May 6; and South +Dakota, Vermilion, May 3, and Harrison, May 10.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of fall arrival are: Quebec, Bras +d’Or, July 29, Caribou Island, August 12, and Indian Tickle, +August 16; Massachusetts, Nantucket, August 18, and Edgartown, +August 21; West Indies, Barbados, August 27, Carriacou, September +5, and Grenada, September 22; Brazil, Amazon River, September +4; and Argentina, Concepcion, September 9.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Mackenzie, Fort Anderson, August +2; Quebec, Koksoak River, September 4, Montreal, September +7, and Magdalen Islands, September 20; New Brunswick, Tabusintac, +September 8; Prince Edward Island, New London, September 1; +Maine, Hog Island, September 2, and Pine Point, September 23; +Massachusetts, East Orleans, September 5, Monomoy Island, September +10, and Nantucket, October 2; Connecticut, Saybrook, October +13; New York, Lockport, October 2; and West Indies, Barbados, +November 4.</p> + +<p>There are a few records in the interior for this season, among +which are: Ontario, Wolf Island, October 10, 1873; Pennsylvania, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_136">[Pg 136]</span>Erie, September 17, 1889; Ohio, Cincinnati, September, 1878; Michigan, +Kalamazoo, October 28, 1879; Illinois, Summit, August 11, +1872; and Wisconsin, Fox Lake, September 10, 1912.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The Eskimo curlew has been taken or reported +from several points outside its normal range, among which are: +Porto Rico, once near San Juan (Gundlach); Bermuda, September, +1874; Greenland, two records (Reinhardt); Pribilof Islands, St. +Paul Island, May 26, 1872; “Bering Sea,” May 22, 1874; Siberia, +Cape Wankarem, August 6, 1881; five records for Great Britain +(Slains, Aberdeenshire, September 28, 1878; near Stonehaven, Kincardineshire, +September 6, 1855; one on the Alde, Aldeburgh, Suffolk; +one at Woodbridge, Suffolk; and one purchased in the flesh at +Dublin, October 21, 1870); and Iceland (Kjaerbölling). The supposed +occurrence of this species in southern California (San Diego +region and near Tia Juana) probably refers to <i>N. hudsonicus</i>, as +does also the record for the Galapagos Islands (Charles Island) and +South Carolina (Charleston).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Mackenzie: 28 records, June 8 to July 12; 14 records, +June 18 to 25.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Whimbrel"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">NUMENIUS PHAEOPUS PHAEOPUS</span> <span class="smaller">(Linnaeus)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">WHIMBREL</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The latest and best authority on the birds of Greenland, E. Lehn +Schiöler, writes that in all probability the whimbrel breeds on the +southern part of the west coast of Greenland, perhaps generally in the +south, but more especially in the southwest. The only other American +record of this species is one from south of Sable Island, Nova +Scotia, on May 25, 1906.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The whimbrel arrives on the British coasts from about +mid-April to June 12, but is very frequently noted during the first +days of May, from which it derives one of its local names, the +“May bird.” On migration it prefers to haunt the low-lying coast +and the adjacent country, feeding on the mud flats and marshes. +When on the wing they fly at a great height, but can be recognized +by their clear seven-syllabled whistle, <i>tetty, tetty, tetty, tet</i>.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—Practically nothing is recorded in the standard works +on British ornithology on the courtship of this species, but some +observations have been made both in Iceland and on the Shetlands. +Reimschneider writes that in Iceland one hears its notes all through +the long summer day and far into the night, a very long-drawn <i>kwiu</i>, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_137">[Pg 137]</span>uttered with inflated throat and scarcely opened bill. The nuptial +song of the male is a long-drawn fluty trill, much slower and longer +than the alarm note. The bird hardly rises above the ground, but +flies with half opened bill for short distances, trilling, then makes +quick and short wing strokes and slowly descends to earth again +with extended wings, when the cry is again uttered. Bernard +Hantzsch (1905) gives a fuller description, which, however, varies +in some details. The male is perched on some hillock, from which +with wide-opened bill he utters a rolling <i>di-di-di</i>. Now he is off, +with his long feet trailing behind and head and neck outstretched. +With short and very rapid wing strokes he rises high in the clear +sky till almost out of sight, meanwhile uttering his soft fluty <i>du-du-du</i>, +sometimes for minutes together. Then follows a slightly +higher and quicker series of notes, ending with a beautiful, soft trill, +louder and faster than that of the golden plover. He then descends +spirally toward the nesting place, thence again starting on his upward +flight. The female also trills, but the song flight is peculiar +to the male.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The breeding grounds of the whimbrel are the vast +expanses of moorland, overgrown with heather and mosses, which are +characteristic of the Arctic tundra. The actual nest is a well-defined +hollow among the heather or rough grass, scantily lined with a few +bits of ling or dry grass and moss. Some nests contain hardly any +material and are merely pressed down and hollowed by the bird. +They do not nest as a rule close together and the breeding place is +jealously guarded by the male who rises fearlessly to attack and +drive off almost any bird which approaches within a 100 yards of +the eggs. Even skuas are attacked in this way, but where they are +numerous the whimbrel stands but a poor chance of rearing young. +In the Shetlands the eggs are laid in the last days of May and early +in June, while in Iceland the normal time is at the beginning of +June and exceptionally late in May.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—These are normally four in number, exceptionally three +only, especially in late layings, and Hantzsch (1905) records one +clutch of five. They are pyriform, and large for the size of the +birds, with thin shells. The ground color varies as a rule from pale +olive green to pale brownish buff, blotched and spotted with olive +brown or reddish brown and with ashy grey shell markings. In +some varieties the ground is a beautiful clear green and the blotches +very bold and conspicuous, while another scarce type has a bluish +grey ground with only large brownish ash blotches. The measurements +of 100 eggs, by Doctor Rey and the writer, average 58.9 +by 41.2 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure +<b>65.1</b> by 41.7, 57 by <b>44</b>, <b>52</b> by 41.6 and 55.3 by <b>36</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_138">[Pg 138]</span></p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Both sexes have incubation patches and from Chislett’s +(1923) observations, confirmed also by Hantzsch, both share in the +work. The only note we have as to the length of the period is that +of Hantzsch (1905) who gives it as three to three and one-half weeks. +In the case of a nest watched by Chislett the first two young hatched +were led away by one bird while the other continued to incubate. +This was on June 23 and the following day was cold with a high +wind. The third chick wandered from the nest and was sometimes +brooded by the incubating bird, which left the fourth egg for that +purpose, but she never seemed thoroughly at ease except when covering +both egg and chick. By the following morning the last chick +had hatched out. Only one brood is reared in the season.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The plumages and molts are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds edited by H. S. Witherby +(1920).</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—This species feeds largely on earthworms, and also during +the winter months on sandworms (<i>Arenicola</i>). Insects are also +freely taken, chiefly beetles (Coleoptera), but also Orthoptera, especially +earwigs (<i>Forficula</i>) and crickets (<i>Acheta</i>), larvae of flies (Diptera) +etc. During the breeding season many small land mollusca +are eaten, especially snails (<i>Helix ericetorum</i>), slugs (<i>Limax agrestris</i>), +etc., and in the autumn, marine mollusca, both univalves and +bivalves. Small Crustacea, including small crabs, shrimps (<i>Crangon</i>) +and Gammaridae are also freely taken and the berries of moorland +plants such as <i>Empetrum nigrum</i> (crowberry) and <i>Vacinium +myrtillus</i>.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The boldness of this species in defending its nest has +already been referred to. It has been frequently seen to attack and +drive off birds much larger and more powerful than itself, such as +the raven and the larger gulls. During the winter months it appears +to be less of a shore feeder than the curlew, frequently visiting +the inland marshes in preference to the mud flats and shores. Chislett +(1923) describes its gait as quite different to that of the curlew, +its progress being much more rapid and direct. Instead of approaching +the nest in a leisurely way with many detours and pauses, +it walks with rapid, jerky strides, almost directly to its objective.</p> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—The large gulls and skuas, though often successfully +driven off when approaching singly, are often successful in destroying +the eggs or young where present in numbers and the enormous +increase in the numbers of the great skua in the Shetlands has proved +very detrimental to this species. In Iceland the Arctic fox is also +an enemy to be counted with and the crow tribe (raven and hooded +crow) are always ready to take advantage of any chance opportunity.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The young are fledged according to Hantzsch (1905) within +a month of hatching and about the beginning of August begin to +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_139">[Pg 139]</span>collect into flocks which increase in size daily. In the second half +of August he records great flocks of over a hundred birds which +leave the island about the middle of September. The latest date on +which Jönsson records them on the Westmann Isles is October 10.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—Exceptionally, small parties remain in Iceland during +the winter. Thus in the winter of 1899–1900 they were noticed by +many observers over Hjalteyri and the adjacent district. On the +other hand, many individuals remain all the year round in their +winter quarters, keeping together in small parties and evidently +non-breeding birds.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—In the British Isles, very sparingly and almost +exterminated on certain islands in the Shetland group. A few +pairs are said to have bred at various localities on the mainland, +chiefly in the north of Scotland and perhaps also on some of the +outlying isles. Breeds freely on the Faroes and Iceland and probably +in southwest Greenland. On the continent and northern +Scandinavia and Finland and in North Russia, south to Kanzan, +Samara, Ufa, Perm, and Orenburg; also in West Siberia at least +to Tara and Tobolsk, but in East Siberia replaced by <i>N. ph. variegatus</i>. +Possibly also breeds in Russia in Voronezh, Kief, and the +middle Urals, but proof still lacking.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—Passes through Europe and western Asia to the +coasts of Africa south to Cape Province, Madagascar, the Seychelles, +Comoro Isles, Aldabra, and Mauritius. In Asia to Arabia, +passing through Iraq to West India, south to Ceylon and the Islands +in the Bay of Bengal.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—The average date of arrival of the migrating +flocks at the Faroes is given as mid April, while in Iceland they +arrive about the end of April or early in May; at the Westmann +Isles on the south coast the earliest and latest dates are given as +April 20 and May 5 by Jönsson.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—The departure from Iceland begins about mid +September, on the Westmann Isles between September 20 and +October 10 (Jönsson), while the Faroes are abandoned by September +29 (exceptionally as late as October 3).</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—It has occurred several times on Jan Meyen, once +Bear Island (June 14, 1898), several times on Spitsbergen, and +also on Kolguev. In the Atlantic it occurs on the Canaries, Madeira, +the Azores, and the Cape Verde Islands. A specimen came on board +a steamer in the vicinity of Sable Island, Nova Scotia, on May 23, +1906 (Latitude 43° north, Longitude 60° west); and one was obtained +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_140">[Pg 140]</span>at Gilgo Inlet, Great South Bay, Long Island, N. Y., on September +4, 1912.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs dates.</i>—In Scotland, May 19 to June 11 (13 dates); Faroes, +June 4 to 24 (34 dates), May 25 (1 date); Iceland, June 4 to 23 +(22 dates).</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Bristle"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">NUMENIUS TAHITIENSIS</span> <span class="smaller">(Gmelin)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">BRISTLE-THIGHED CURLEW</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>Although this species has been recognized for over 140 years, +surprisingly little has been learned or published about it. It +was discovered by Latham in 1785 from Tahiti, the largest of the +Society Islands, hence the specific name given by Gmelin in 1788, +<i>Scolopax tahitiensis</i>. But the credit is due to Peale for discovering +the most peculiar character of the species, the elongated shafts of +some of the flank feathers which are lacking in barbs and from +which we derive the name, “bristle-thighed.”</p> + +<p>It was long supposed to be a bird of the South Pacific islands +and the first birds captured in Alaska were regarded as accidental +stragglers. During the last century there were only three published +North American records, all for Alaska; the first specimen was taken +by Bischoff on May 18, 1869, on the Kenai Peninsula, the second by +Nelson on May 24, 1880, at St. Michael, and the third by Townsend +on August 28, 1885, on the Kowak River. Since then it has been +found to be a fairly common fall migrant in Alaska and it probably +breeds somewhere in the interior of that territory.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—Dr. E. W. Nelson (1887) gives the following account of +the capture of his bird:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On May 24, 1880, while I was shooting black brant, a pair of these birds +settled near by on a rising stretch of land covered with large tussocks. They +uttered a loud whistling call note very much like that of <i>hudsonicus</i>, but +something in their general appearance led me to stalk and secure one of the +birds. To my gratification it was a bristle-thighed curlew, and I made great +efforts to secure the mate, which had stopped a hundred yards or so beyond. +As she raised on my approach I fired at long range and the bird fell mortally +hurt on a distant hillside, where it was lost amid a host of large tussocks.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Bischoff’s bird was taken on May 18; and H. B. Conover (1926) +collected one at Hooper Bay on May 22, 1924. These three dates, +only six days apart, probably indicate the normal time of arrival of +birds of this species in Alaska after their long flight over the Pacific +Ocean from the Hawaiian Islands, the nearest of their winter resorts. +This is a really wonderful flight and it is surprising that we have +no evidence to indicate that they deviate from their direct course +at all, as we have no records of any specimens from any point to +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_141">[Pg 141]</span>the westward or to the southward of the Alaska Peninsula. The +species is comparatively scarce on the Bering Sea coast of Alaska, +from which we might infer that an overland flight is made from +the vicinity of the Kenai Peninsula to the breeding grounds somewhere +in the northern interior of Alaska.</p> + +<p><i>Summer.</i>—The breeding grounds and the nesting habits of the +bristle-thighed curlew are entirely unknown, an interesting problem +for some enterprising ornithologist to work out. Mr. Conover +(1926) suggests that “the main breeding ground is probably above the +timber line on some of the mountain ranges” of Alaska. Herbert +W. Brandt says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>From the native information I was able to gather I believe that these birds +may breed at the eastern end of the Askinuk Mountains, or in the Kusilvak +Mountains and perhaps the mountains to the northward of Mountain Village +on the Yukon River. Their early loitering appearance at Hooper Bay so +shortly after nesting makes it entirely unlikely that they had traveled very +far, but it seems rather strange that we did not encounter them in their +spring migration and further it is apparently doubtful that they should enter +the Bering Sea coast territory by following down either the Yukon or the +Kuskoquim River valleys.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Dr. Charles H. Townsend shot a specimen of this curlew at Kotzebue +Sound (Kobuk River) on August 25; it was a young bird which +had evidently recently come from its breeding grounds. We saw +none of this species about Nome in July; but after I left, Rollo H. +Beck, a member of our expedition, collected quite a series of them in +August. Two of his birds, now in my collection, were taken at Cape +Nome on August 24, 1911. Mr. Conover (1926) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>By the end of July we had entered the Kashunuk Slough and traveled down +it until we were about 20 miles from where it enters Hooper Bay. At this +place was an Eskimo village where we stopped for a few days to have a goose +drive; and it was here that we saw the bristle-thighed curlew in abundance. +On July 31 a pair was seen and collected, and on August 3 one more was taken. +August 4 was the big day, as several hundred of these birds were seen on +the tundra feeding on blueberries. About a dozen were taken by our party, and +I personally believe I saw over a hundred, while another member of the +expedition, who was off in another direction, estimated that he saw three times +as many. All the specimens taken were old birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The above facts would seem to indicate that the main breeding +grounds are somewhere in the interior of extreme northern Alaska, +probably on the barren grounds; that the spring migration is well +inland; and that there is a heavy fall migration along the Bering +Sea coast. The eggs and downy young are entirely unknown and +there are not enough specimens available to work out the molts and +plumages, which probably correspond to those of closely related +species.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_142">[Pg 142]</span></p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Probably the feeding habits of this curlew are not very +different from those of the Hudsonian curlew, but the only food +mentioned by observers consists of berries. Birds collected in Alaska +were feeding on blueberries. They are said to feed on <i>Canthium</i> +berries in the Hawaiian Islands; and birds shot on Midway Island +by Dr. Paul Bartsch (1922) were “crammed full of <i>Scaevola</i> berries.”</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Doctor Bartsch (1922) found this bird “quite abundant +on both” Midway Islands in November, “where in company with +the golden plover it frequents all parts of the island excepting those +covered by brush. These birds were quite tame as well as curious +and when flushed would frequently fly about us, emitting their +peculiar cry.”</p> + +<p>Dill and Bryan (1912) reported about 250 on Laysan Island in +the spring; they say:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Just before sunset and early in the morning the bristle-thighed curlews +would come up around our camp uttering their peculiar complaining notes. +They roosted on the roofs of the old buildings at night, sometimes as many as +20 birds in one flock. We saw them feeding on different parts of the island but +usually about the lagoon or along the beaches.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Donald R. Dickey photographed a bristle-thighed curlew on Laysan +Island in the act of robbing a nest of the man-o-war bird, of which +he tells me:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This was not a sporadic bit of deviltry engaged in by one perverted individual. +Instead, it was characteristic of most, if not all, of the curlews present on +Laysan at the time we were there. In other words, they indulged in organized +banditry, working about the island in troupes accompanied by numbers of +turnstones and an occasional golden plover which were partners in crime with +the curlew. The turnstones jammed their bills straight into the lighter-shelled +eggs, but the curlew, frequently at least, got access to the contents of the +larger eggs by raising them in their bills and then dropping them back on the +hard sand until they broke. They can pick up and run away with an egg up to +the size of a man-o-war bird’s egg. In the case of the latter, the more dexterous +birds seized the egg and held it endwise in the bill. It seems difficult +for them to pick it up otherwise.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Dr. Alexander Wetmore has sent me the following notes on this +subject:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>That a bird of the shore-bird family should destroy eggs may seem almost +unbelievable in view of the habits ordinary in this group, yet in work in the +Hawaiian Bird Reservation in 1923 we found the bristle-thighed curlew, as well +as the turnstone, making regular practice of eating the eggs of the birds nesting +on these distant islands. The sooty and gray-backed terns were the greatest +sufferers, as the curlew drove their long bills through the eggs with ease, or +seized them in their long mandibles to carry them away and eat them at their +leisure. On close observation we found that curlews attacked the eggs of all +birds indiscriminately, even pulling an egg from beneath a frigate bird when the +incubating bird raised on the nest for a moment, the theft being committed +so adroitly that the egg seemingly was not missed. Mr. Donald Dickey in his +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_143">[Pg 143]</span>motion pictures succeeded in filming a spirited scene in which a bristle-thighed +curlew after a number of attempts accomplished the seemingly impossible +feat of carrying away a frigate bird’s egg held firmly between its mandibles, +while a group of apparently admiring turnstones, robbers themselves but incapable +of such herculean acts of banditry, scurried about in the background. +On another occasion a curlew flew up to a red-footed booby’s nest in a bush +several feet from the ground in the temporary absence of the owner, impaled +the egg, and dragged it away to be devoured. The booby was still brooding +disconsolately in her empty nest two days later. On another day a curlew +deliberately opened an old albatross egg found in the sand and ate eagerly +from the putrid interior. As this egg had been lying unprotected from the +sun for at least four months previous, its condition may be imagined, yet the +bird returned avidly again and again to continue its horrid repast though I +approached within 10 feet.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—Mr. Conover (1926) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The call and appearance of this species are entirely different from that of the +Hudsonian curlew. The latter gives a very short whistling call, which is +roughly as follows: <i>Whe-whe-whe-whe</i>. The former, on the other hand, has a +call very similar to one of the black-bellied plover and sounds something like +wheeeu-whu. In appearance the bristle-thigh is tawnier above and has a very +reddish-brown unbarred rump, which is a very good field mark.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Alaska and islands in the Pacific Ocean.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—Unknown, but considered probable in northern +or northwestern Alaska.</p> + +<p>The bristle-thighed curlew does not seem to be abundant and consequently +has been under observation at comparatively few points. +Specimens have been observed or taken in summer in Alaska at +Kotzebue Sound, Hooper Bay, Kobuk River, Lopp Lagoon, and Mint +River. One also was taken on St. George Island, of the Pribilof +group, on May 26, 1917.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—During the winter they are found north to the +Hawaiian Islands (Lisiansky, Laysan, French Frigate Shoal, Bird +Island, and Hawaii); east to Hawaii, Palmyra Island, Fanning +Island, Christmas Island, Marquesas Islands, Society Islands +(Tahiti), and the Paumotu Archipelago (Vincennes Island); south +to the Low or Paumotu Archipelago (Vincennes Island), Cook +Islands (Palmerston Island), and probably New Caledonia; west to +probably New Caledonia, Phoenix Islands (Canton and Phoenix +Island), Gilbert Islands, the Marshall Islands (Jaluit Island), and +the Hawaiian Islands (Lisiansky Island).</p> + +<p><i>Migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival for bristle-thighed curlews in +Alaska are: Fort Kenai, May 18, 1869; Nome River, May 23, 1905; +and Cape Mountain, May 28, 1922.</p> + +<p>They have been detected in the Kotzebue Sound region as late as +August 26, 1885.</p> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_144">[Pg 144]</span></p> +<h2 style="display: none; visibility: hidden;">Family CHARADRIIDAE, Plovers</h2> +<p class="center">Family CHARADRIIDAE, Plovers</p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">VANELLUS VANELLUS</span> <span class="smaller">(Linnaeus)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">LAPWING</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The status of this bird in North America is a remarkable one. +Up to 1927, with the exception of Greenland, where according to +Lehn Schiöler, it is an occasional visitor, it had only been recorded on +about seven occasions from the American Continent. Excluding +Alaska, all the other records are from the eastern seaboard, the +Bahamas and Barbados. In December, 1927, large flocks, numbering +thousands, according to one reporter, were recorded from a +number of places along the east coast of Newfoundland, in the middle +of the country and also on the west coast. Among the birds obtained +was one sent from Bonavista, Newfoundland, by Canon A. G. Bagley +on December 31, which still bore the ring with which it had +been marked as a nestling in May, 1926, at Ullswater, Cumberland, +England, by Dr. H. J. Moon.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—In the British Isles the migratory movements are rather +complicated and irregular, but many birds which have wintered in +the south and near the great estuaries and marshes begin to work +their way back to their breeding places inland, and to the north of +Scotland which is practically deserted by them during the winter +months.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—The lapwing is a highly gregarious species and even +in the height of the breeding season, when territorial jealousy on the +part of the males is apparent, several pairs are generally to be found +nesting within a short distance of one another. The courtship +habits have been closely studied by the late S. E. Brock in Scotland, +and more recently by William Farren, R. H. Brown, and J. K. +Stanford, so that there is plenty of material at hand.</p> + +<p>Even in the autumn and early winter months when the weather +is open, especially after frosts, a certain amount of sexual activity +is evident. Some of the males show indications of territorial +defense and fighting takes place intermittently. It is not till the +winter is over and the males have returned to their breeding grounds, +which is generally from late February to early March, that the +nesting territory is definitely parceled out among the males. The +areas may vary considerably in shape and size and are not always +clearly defined, but each bird shows distinct signs of jealousy at any +invasion on the part of a neighbor and aerial combats take place +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_145">[Pg 145]</span>from time to time, though sometimes a male will desert the group of +“scrapes” which marks his territorial center and adopt a new series. +These “scrapes” form an important part in the ritual of courtship. +On the appearance of a female the male utters a grating note while +standing upright and moving wings and tail up and down rhythmically. +He then drops to the ground and, as Brock describes it, +“lying far forward on his breast, shuffles the body, and scrapes energetically +with the feet, which may be seen in rapid motion. At short +intervals the tail is spasmodically bent downwards, the action corresponding +with energetic footwork.” He then rises jerking bits of +stubble over his shoulder, and in this way a little group of hollows +or “scrapes” is formed, one of which ultimately becomes the nest. +Apparently the female makes choice from several sites originally +selected by the male.</p> + +<p>From time to time the male makes the spring flight which has been +well described by Brock.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Rising from the ground the male executes a few labored flaps, moving the +wings with exaggerated slowness, owllike; thence he quickens his pace and +rising suddenly at an abrupt angle, commences the song, the greater part of +which, however, is emitted as the bird falls again. During the utterance of the +song is a pause occurring after the penultimate note, the performer throws +himself sideways almost on his back, instantly recovering himself with a flurry +of wings. The bird now scuds rapidly over the ground at a moderate height, +making a pronounced humming sound with the motion of his sharply driven +pinions, and occasionally tilting himself from side to side, much in the manner +of a snipe when flushed.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The song is well rendered by Brock as <i>whey-willuchooee-willuch-willuch-cooee</i>. +The first syllable long and hoarse, the second and +third <i>willuch</i> uttered rapidly and staccato, then a pause, during which +the partial somersault is executed, followed by the loud and musical +final note. The Norfolk marshmen’s transliteration is also good, +“Three bullocks a week, week after week.”</p> + +<p>Sometimes two rival males will rise together in the air almost perpendicularly +each trying to rise above the other.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At intervals the upper bird stoops suddenly to the lower, an attack usually +avoided by an agile turn of the wing, but occasionally a distant and hollow clap +is audible, indicating an exchange of blows apparently with the wing. On at +length parting company both combatants break into full song flight, repeating +it twice or thrice ere resettling in their respective stations.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>These encounters seem as a rule not to be of a very serious character +and the occasional fights between rivals carried on near the +ground, in which one bird swoops repeatedly from one side or the +other at its opponent, which in turn avoids the attack by little upward +springs or swerving aside, seem to be of a more serious character. +When a hen bird approaches, the male bird runs toward her and describes +a half circle round her with stiff and constrained air. Then +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_146">[Pg 146]</span>he makes for the nearest “scrape” and at once drops into it, working +with furious energy and occasionally dropping bits of straw over +his shoulder. At first the hen makes no response, but about a fortnight +after the beginning of the courtship she approaches the spot +where he is at work by indirect stages. The male then rises and steps +forward, with his back to the hen, slowly lowering his bill to the +ground and raising his tail perpendicularly, thus displaying his +richly colored undertail coverts. The female now settles into the +“scrape” and imitates the actions of the cock, but with less energy, +the male meanwhile retaining his strange uptilted attitude and collecting +nesting material which is jerked over his shoulder toward +the “scrape.” When at length the hen leaves the “scrape” the male +reenters and sometimes the hen also repeats the process. Coition +takes place a few days before the eggs are laid and immediately afterwards +the hen works in the “scrape” with far more energy than +before, the male often taking his place in another scrape. Both birds +go through the ceremony of throwing bits of nest material over the +shoulder. No serious attempt is made on the part of other males to +interfere with a paired hen, and she on her part seems to avoid any +strange cock bird.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Although it is usual for several pairs to breed in company +the actual nests are usually some distance apart, and nearly +always on slightly raised ground. They may be found on plowed +land or on pasture and occasionally moorland, and vary somewhat +in size, some being merely muddy hollows with a few bits of straw +and bent, while others, especially on grass lands, are fairly substantial +edifices of dead vegetable matter collected round the nesting +“scrape” originally made by the male.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—Normally four, but on rare occasions five, have been +recorded, and when a bird has been robbed twice, sets of three and +even two or one egg may be found late in the season. When the birds +have been much persecuted as many as 20 have been laid in one +season by a single female. They are pyriform in shape and lie in +the nest with the points touching one another. As a rule there is +not much variation, the usual ground color being stone color or +brownish olive with black spots and blotches chiefly towards the +large end. Some eggs have the ground almost hidden by dense +black markings, and there are types in which the spots are mainly +replaced by short black lines. More remarkable varieties are those +in which the ground color in bluish white or some shade of greenish +olive, with scanty markings of black, and the rare erythristic +type in which the ground color is pale brick red or deep red brown +with rich red brown markings. This wonderful variation has been +recorded from Friesland as well as many parts of the British Isles. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_147">[Pg 147]</span>The measurements of 100 eggs measured by the writer average 47 +by 33.7 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>58</b> +by 32.5, 47.4 by <b>37.2</b>, <b>42.3</b> by 33 and 44.7 by <b>31.2</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Incubation is performed by both sexes, but much the +greater part by the hen, the male being on guard to give the alarm. +Incubation begins with the third or fourth egg and the period is +as a rule 24 or 25 days, but in some cases is said to extend to 27 +or even 28 days. The adults are very bold and demonstrative when +the eggs are chipping and will even strike sheep or dogs. The +young remain in the nest until the down has been thoroughly dried +and at first do not travel far afield, crouching when the parents give +the alarm. They can swim readily and are led by the old birds from +dry uplands toward water meadows. Directly the young are able to +fly they assemble into flocks. Only one brood is reared during the +season.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The plumages and molts are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds, edited by H. F. Witherby +(1920).</p> + +<p>Ridgway (1919) says that the sexes are alike, and that he has +been unable to verify the supposed differences in the wing formula of +male and female. It is, however, easy to distinguish the sexes in +life by the shape of the wing of the male, which is, as described by +Frohawk and others, much more rounded in shape than that of the +female.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—This consists largely of earthworms, mollusca (including +the large slugs <i>Arion</i> and <i>Agriolimax</i> as well as the smaller snails, +<i>Helix</i> sp.; also during the winter months marine shell fish, <i>Tellina</i>, +<i>Bythinia</i>, <i>Physa</i>, etc.) and insects. This latter family includes Coleoptera +(<i>Otiorhynchus</i>, Carabidae, <i>Ocypusolens</i>, <i>Aphodius</i>, <i>Agriotes</i>, +various species of <i>Geodephaga</i>, etc.), Diptera, including larvae of +Tipulidae, Lepidoptera (many larvae of moths such as <i>Noctua segetum</i>, +<i>N. exclamationes</i>, etc.), and Orthoptera. Vegetable matter is +also eaten, but not largely. Seeds of <i>Ranunculus repens</i>, <i>Polygonum +aviculare</i>, and <i>Spergula</i> have been recognized, also fragments of seaweed +(Algae) in winter. Spiders and marine crustacea are also +recorded.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The lapwing is preeminently a gregarious bird. All +through the winter months it is to be met with in flocks, sometimes +of great size, and even in the breeding season it is rare to find a single +pair nesting out of sight and earshot of its neighbors. The curious +“wobbling” flight enables the species to be recognized at great distances. +Unlike some other gregarious species, such as the starling, +the lapwing is not expert in the art of simultaneous maneuvers and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_148">[Pg 148]</span>it is a common sight to see a big flock rise together on the wing and +break up at once into two bodies moving in different directions. +Then gradually birds from the smaller body will gravitate toward +the larger flock and after a time the two will reunite, but there is a +lack of leadership and confidence in their movements which at once +distinguishes them from the smartly wheeling flocks of dunlins, knots, +or other gregarious waders. Sometimes a party of golden plover will +associate on the wing with a flock of lapwing, but here, again, the +difference is very striking.</p> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—Probably the rook destroys more eggs and small young +than any other foe except man, but the jackdaw, hooded crow, and +carrion crow are all apt to devour the eggs. I have seen a sparrow +hawk drop from a tree onto a bird rising from its nest and bind +onto it for a time, but the lapwing broke free after a struggle. It is +not uncommon to find remains of birds on the feeding tables of the +sparrow hawk near a breeding ground. The peregrine also sometimes +takes lapwing, but its erratic tumbling flight renders it a +difficult prey.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—Ringing has proved that some of the British-reared birds +find their way to Iceland, France, and Portugal. In mild winters +there are always a considerable number of flocks in our southern +counties, but hard frosts or deep snow will cause them to move to the +south coast or to emigrate.</p> + +<p>Although a most useful bird from the agriculturist’s point of view, +the lapwing is shot freely during the autumn and winter, chiefly by +shore shooters, while the demand for its eggs as delicacies has also +been detrimental to its status. In Holland the earliest clutches are +all taken for the market and this has had no injurious effect, as the +birds lay again and are then protected strictly.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—Europe north to the Arctic Circle, the British +Isles, but only exceptionally in the Faroes, and not in Iceland. In +Finland to latitude 68° on the Muonio River and in Russia north to +Archangel. Southward it breeds in Andalusia and in the Balkan +Peninsula to Macedonia, but not in Greece or the Mediterranean +Islands. Breeding in Morocco requires confirmation. It also breeds +across Asia east to the Pacific, south to Transcaspia and Yarkand.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—Many birds winter in the British Isles, but on the +Continent they move to southern Europe and northern Africa, visiting +the Atlantic isles occasionally (Canaries, Madeira, etc.). In +Asia, Asia Minor, Palestine, Iraq, Persia, and north India, China, +North Burma, and Japan.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_149">[Pg 149]</span></p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—The northward movement of continental birds +depends much on the weather. In mild winters they have appeared +in Denmark in January and February, but the average date is about +March 6. In Sweden the arrival is also irregular, from mid February +to mid March, but in south Finland not till late in March. In central +Europe the birds arrive as a rule on the breeding grounds early in +March, and the Mediterranean passage is generally over by the beginning +of that month.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Migrants from the north arrive at Gibraltar +about mid October, while in Malta the passage takes place in November, +and in Greece at the end of October. In Iraq they arrive from +October 22 onward, but chiefly in early November.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—Greenland, occasional visitor (Julianehaab 1847; +Fiskenaes 7, I, 1820, etc.) Iceland; numerous records between September +and March; Labrador (Cartwright, January, 1917); Newfoundland, +White Hills, November 23, 1905 and recently (December, +1927); Nova Scotia (Ketch Harbor, March 17, 1897); Long Island, +New York (Merrick, 2 specimens, December 26, 1883 and Meccox +Bay, Waterville, autumn 1905); Bahamas (Hog Island, November, +1900); Barbados (December 24, 1886); West Alaska (small islets +in Norton Sound); Madeira (Machico, December 6, 1891, December +2, 1889, December 4, 1893, January 14, 1895, March 10, 1895, December +15, 1896, and November 28, 1897); Jan Mayen (30 on April 8, +1883).</p> + +<p>[<span class="smcap">Author’s note.</span>—The most remarkable occurrence of this species +took place during the fall and winter of 1927–28. A specimen was +taken on Baffin Island in October; and they appeared in large numbers +in Newfoundland (Bonavista) in December, where one man was +reported to have killed 60 individuals, one of which carried a band +of British Bird Magazine that had been attached in Cumberland, +England, in May, 1926. Capt. Donald MacMillan reported them at +Anatalok Bay, Labrador, on December 22, and a specimen was +obtained January 6, 1928, at North Head, Grand Manan, New +Brunswick.]</p> + +<p>C. L. Whittle (1928) has suggested the following theory, as to the +possible cause of this unusual flight:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>As to the cause of the movement of lapwings to Newfoundland and the route +taken, it is perhaps helpful to study the Pilot Charts of the North Atlantic +above referred to. During the month of December, the 16th and 17th, a well-developed +cyclone of exceptional intensity had its center well to the east of +Spain, with a low pressure of 28.30 inches, and with accompanying strong +southeasterly winds from western Europe. These winds might easily have +been instrumental in driving lapwings to Iceland, five to seven hundred miles +distant, and to Greenland. Later, polar winds and a search for food may have +played important parts in forcing a movement southwesterly to northern +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_150">[Pg 150]</span>Labrador, and then southeasterly, following the coast to Newfoundland. Here, +near the shore, snowless tundras, which probably would furnish a food supply, +may have existed, even in December, with the result that the recently scattered +birds became gradually concentrated.⁠<a id="FNanchor_2_2" href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a></p> +</blockquote> + +<div class="footnotes"> +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_2_2" href="#FNanchor_2_2" class="label">[2]</a> See also A Transatlantic Passage of Lapwings, by H. F. Witherby, in British Birds, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 22, pp. 6–13.</p></div> +</div> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—March 2 to 19 (9 dates); March 26 to 31 (18 dates); +April 1 to 14 (60 dates); April 15 to 30 (29 dates, probably including +many second layings); late date June 22. All the above from +England.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Dotterel"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">EUDROMIAS MORINELLUS</span> <span class="smaller">(Linnaeus)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">DOTTEREL</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The claim of this species to a place in the American list rests on +a single occurrence at King Island, Alaska, on July 23, 1897.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The regularity of the appearance of the dotterel on +migration at almost the same spots year after year and approximately +about the same time in spring, has proved a great disadvantage +to the species, as being very tame and unsuspicious and +much sought after, not only as a delicacy for the table, but also on +account of the demand for its feathers on the part of fly-fishers, it +was mercilessly shot on the way to its breeding grounds in the north +of England and Scotland. The usual date of arrival was about the +last week of April and the beginning of May and little “trips” +might be looked for annually at certain favored spots along the +route northward. Exceptionally early arrivals have been recorded +on March 25, April 4 and April 8, but these are quite unusual.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—Owing no doubt partly to the inaccessible nature of +its haunts and also partly to its scarcity, there is nothing on record +in the literature as to the courtship of this bird. All writers are +agreed that the migrants which pass through England are in small +flocks or “trips” and are still unpaired. In 1922 I was on the high +field of West Finmark and there was still a great deal of snow about, +but here and there islands of gray rock stood out from the snow field. +Here we met with dotterel in fair numbers, evidently pairing and +house hunting. They shared the ground with a few snow buntings +and ptarmigan, and it was obvious that already certain spots had +been selected for breeding. Sometimes three birds would be seen +wheeling round a bare patch of moor and rock and freely uttering +their courting notes, which reminded us of those of the ring plover. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_151">[Pg 151]</span>We saw nothing to suggest the existence of a nuptial song flight, but +further observations at this period would be of great interest.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—In Scotland and the English lake district the breeding +haunts of this species must be looked for at about 2,500 to 3,500 feet +or even higher, not on the mountain tops, but on plateaus or slopes +below the highest points. Here, where the only vegetation consists +of a scanty growth of heather mixed with wiry grass, mosses and +lichens, and occasional fragments of gray rock crop out here and +there, the dotterel is at home. Few living things haunt their solitudes; +a stray raven or eagle may pass over occasionally, but as a +rule there is hardly a sign of life anywhere. There is some evidence +that one or two “scrapes” are made by one pair of birds, but we +have no information as to which of the two is responsible for making +the hollow. The eggs are laid in a natural depression adapted by +the bird, roughly about three and one-half inches across and fairly +deep, as a rule, but generally filled with fragments of lichen or the +red leaves of the cranberry, so that the eggs are not difficult to see +though their coloring harmonizes with the surroundings.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—Normally three, but frequently two only, while instances +of four are comparatively rare. They are more elliptical and less +pyriform than most waders’ eggs and are not unlike some types +of eggs of the Arctic tern, though almost always more boldly blotched. +In color they range from yellowish olive to clay color, occasionally +with a greenish tinge and are boldly spotted and blotched with deep +blackish brown and a few ashy shell marks. The average of 100 +British eggs, measured by the writer is 41.1 by 28.8 millimeters; the +eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>46.7</b> by 31.3, 44.5 by <b>31.5</b>, +<b>37.5</b> by 29 and 41.6 by <b>27.4</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p>The sexes are not easy to distinguish in the field, but nearly all the +positive evidence from birds shot off the eggs goes to prove that the +male is generally to be found incubating. H. H. Slater shot two +males from eggs. H. J. Pearson and Gloger had similar experiences, +and Bengt Berg, who has watched this bird at close quarters, says +that only the male incubates. Many accounts have been published +of the behavior of the sitting bird. When flushed from the eggs it +returns by a circuitous route, cowering like a mouse, as one observer +describes it, sometimes stopping to look round and sometimes doubling +back on his tracks like a hunted hare, but all the time, in +spite of the numerous turns and twists, gradually approaching the +eggs to which at last a short direct run is made. Viewed from +behind the bird is exceedingly difficult to follow with the eye in its +environment, so that close watching is necessary to mark it down. +When the nest has once been discovered, or if the bird is brooding +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_152">[Pg 152]</span>young, it will show extraordinary boldness and will even allow +itself to be lifted off the nest by the hand, settling down again as soon +as it is removed. Bengt Berg actually succeeded in photographing +a bird in the act of accepting a worm from the hand. The only +information as to the length of the incubation period is Heyshams +oft-quoted assertion that it rarely lasts more than 18 or 20 days. +Only a single brood is reared in a season, but the hen will lay a +second time about a fortnight after the first clutch has been +destroyed.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—In one case when Seton Gordon came across a nest with +half-grown chicks, both parents showed signs of great excitement and +almost complete disregard of his presence, running backward and +forward and frequently uttering their soft whistle which sounded +something like <i>twee, twee, tuur</i>, the first two notes pitched in a +high key and the last a purring sound difficult to express in writing. +On other occasions only a single old bird accompanied the young and +considerable differences were apparent in their behavior, some showing +signs of great anxiety when the young were approached while +others were apparently almost indifferent and remained some distance +off.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The plumages and molts are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds edited by H. F. Witherby +(1920).</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—On its breeding grounds it feeds on insects (Diptera, +Coleoptera, and their larvae). Collett records <i>Bembidium</i> and +<i>Elater</i> larvae; Petenyi records <i>Dorcadion</i>, <i>Silpha</i>, and <i>Pachygastra</i>. +Earthworms are also taken, according to Saxby, Collett, and Berg. +H. J. Pearson also records vegetable matter, apparently seeds of +<i>Empetrum nigrum</i> or crowberry. H. B. Tristram writes that in its +winter quarters in Palestine it subsists largely on small snails +(<i>Helix</i>).</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The dotterel is a quiet, unobtrusive bird, not associating +much with other waders and generally met with in small +parties out of the breeding season. Its general brown coloring is not +striking and no doubt it is frequently overlooked. Its flight is +strong, the clean-cut wings, as Gordon says, “moving with swift and +powerful strokes only a few feet above the surface of the ground.”</p> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—Naumann (1887) states that the chief enemies of the +dotterel are the falcons (peregrine, hobby, and merlin) and the +short-winged hawks (goshawk and sparrow hawk).</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—At Heligoland Gätke (1895) observed large numbers of +young birds of the year on passage on one or two occasions; on +August 22, 1882, great numbers passed, although wind and rain +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_153">[Pg 153]</span>prevailed, and on September 4 in fine weather one flight alone took +five minutes to pass, an unprecedented occurrence.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—Lord Lilford found it abundant in its winter quarters +on the plains of Tunisia consorting with sand grouse, lapwings, +golden plover, little bustards, and cranes. He failed to get within +shot on foot, but killed many from horse, donkey, or camel, though +the birds would run about fearlessly within a few feet of the Arab +plowmen.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—In the British Isles confined to a few localities +in the North Pennine and Cumbrian Hills, and in Scotland chiefly to +levels of 3,000 to 4,000 feet in the Grampians and Cairngorms, and +very locally north and west. On the Continent, in northern Scandinavia, +north Finland and Russia, Nova Zembla, Waigatz, and Kolguev. +It is found locally in the Riesengebirge, Styria, Transylvania, +etc. It is also said to breed in southeast Russia. In Asia it is found +across Siberia and on the New Siberian Isles in the tundra and +south to the mountain ranges of central Asia.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—Extends to North Africa, Palestine and Syria, +Iraq, Arabia, and Persia.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—In the western Mediterranean it is scarce on +spring passage, but Brehm obtained one at Cartagena, Spain, on +March 31. It is also of rare occurrence at Malta in spring and seldom +recorded from Greece. At Muonioniska flocks arrive from the south +about May 29 and remain for a week or two before proceeding to +their breeding grounds on the tundra.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—The great bulk of migrants seem to pass through +eastern Europe southward through Palestine, but small numbers pass +the Straits of Gibraltar in August and September, and it is not uncommon +on Malta in October and November (early date, August 23; +late date, December 11). Whitaker notes its arrival in Tunisia in +September and October.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—Saxby records one on the Shetlands in mid-June, +1869. It is a rare visitor to the Canaries and has not been recorded +there for many years. The supposed record from Spitzbergen is +probably a mistaken identification, but it has occurred in Japan and +on King Island, Alaska (July 23, 1897).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—British Isles, 8 dates between May 30, and June 15; +5 dates between June 21 and July 14; probably including some +second layings. In Scandinavia, 14 dates between June 3 and 15; 33 +dates between June 16 and 30; 2 dates between July 1 and 6.</p> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_154">[Pg 154]</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">SQUATAROLA SQUATAROLA</span> <span class="smaller">(Linnaeus)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">BLACK-BELLIED PLOVER</span><br></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>I use the above name rather than the latest check list name, +<i>cynosurae</i> because I can not see any valid reason for recognizing a +North American race of this cosmopolitan species. A slight average +difference in size is of little significance in a species which shows such +a wide range of individual variation. Recent investigation has, I +believe, convinced even Mr. Bangs that this race, which he described, +has no standing. The bird which breeds in northeastern Siberia +has been separated under the name <i>hypomelaena</i>; this may be a good +race, though material to establish it is rather scanty in this country. +Probably it is the Siberian race which breeds on the Bering Sea +coast of Alaska. For life-history purposes the species, as a whole, +will be considered.</p> + +<p>The black-bellied plover is an aristocrat among shore birds, the +largest and strongest of the plovers, a leader of its tribe. It is a +distinguished-looking bird in its handsome spring livery of black and +white; and its attitude, as it stands like a sentinel on the crest of a +sand dune or on some distant mud flat, is always dignified and imposing. +Its wild, plaintive, and musical whistle arouses the enthusiasm +of the sportsman and serves both as a warning and as an invitation +to the lesser fowl that look to it for leadership.</p> + +<p>Its breeding range is circumpolar, but decidedly spotty; there are +very few places where it breeds at all commonly. On migrations it +is widely distributed over nearly all of the Northern Hemisphere. +It was never as abundant in this country as the golden plover and +apparently never traveled in such immense flocks; hence it was never +slaughtered in such enormous numbers. Moreover, it is much wilder, +more wary, and better able to take care of itself; consequently it has +held its own much better and has proven more of a success in the +struggle for existence.</p> + +<p>Nevertheless, it has been considerably reduced in numbers during +the past 75 years. I am inclined to think that the reduction in numbers +is more apparent than real and that the birds have learned to +avoid certain localities, where they were once so abundant and where +they have been so persistently pursued by gunners. George H. +Mackay (1892) has shown a decided decrease on Nantucket, which +he attributes to such a cause. From my own 30 years’ experience on +Cape Cod I know that this has taken place there; I have noticed +a gradual decrease in the numbers of black-bellied plover that come +to Chatham and Monomoy during the fall flight, until now I often +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_155">[Pg 155]</span>see no more than half a dozen in a day, where formerly we used to +see them in hundreds. On the spring flight, however, they are often +very abundant there, and apparently have increased since spring +shooting was stopped; formerly they were much more abundant in +the fall than in the spring, but the reverse is now the case. This is +a striking example of the bird’s sagacity. Francis N. Balch told me +that he saw at least 4,000 black-bellied plover on Monomoy on one +day during the height of the spring flight in 1927. This compares +favorably with Nuttall’s much quoted statement that flocks of more +than 1,000 gathered near Boston about 100 years ago. Some of the +figures given below will show that there are still plenty of black-bellied +plover left in places where they are not too much molested.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—From the northern part of its winter range in the southern +States the black-bellied plover starts on its northward migration +in April and there is a general northward movement, entirely across +the continent, all through May; the last of the migrants do not leave +the northern States until the first week in June. Arthur T. Wayne +(1910) says that, in South Carolina, “when the wind is from the +south and the tide is low in the afternoon, these birds migrate in +small flocks in a northwesterly direction,” probably taking an overland +route to their breeding grounds. But there is also a heavy +northward migration along the Atlantic coast, at least as far as New +Jersey, whence I believe the main flight swings inland, though there +is a well-marked spring migration in Massachusetts, mainly during +the last half of May, which seems to have increased in recent years. +During the latter part of May, 1927, I was privileged to see, through +the kindness of Dr. Harry C. Oberholser, the greatest flight of +black-bellied plover, dowitchers, and turnstones that I have ever +seen. On the coast of New Jersey, in the vicinity of Tuckerton +Bay and Little Egg Harbor, we made actual counts, or careful estimates, +of all birds seen and the totals were far ahead of any he had +recorded there in recent years. Seven day’s records show a total +of over 20,000 black-bellied plover; on our two best days, May 27 +and 28, we recorded 6,200 and 5,600; and on our poorest day, May 25, +we counted only 238, showing that they came in waves. The black-bellied +plover were often associated in the large flocks with ruddy +turnstones; we saw one immense flock which we estimated to contain +3,500 birds of these two species. This great flock was a thrilling +sight, as it swept in over the marsh like a great cloud and +alighted; twice, while we were watching, it arose like a swarm of +insects, circled about, separated into two divisions, joined again, and +alighted. We did not see it depart.</p> + +<p>This seems to be the best place on the New Jersey coast to observe +shore birds in large numbers, where they alight to rest and feed on +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_156">[Pg 156]</span>the large, flat, marshy islands. These are mud islands raised but a +few feet above high water and some of them are partially flooded +during spring tides; they are mainly covered with salt-marsh grasses, +intersected by tidal creeks and dotted with small pond holes or bare +muddy splashes. The plover alighted on the bare spaces or in the +short grass, where the large flocks seen in the distance seemed to +whiten the ground. These large flocks, with sentinels always alert, +were utterly unapproachable; and even the small flocks and single +birds were as shy as ever. At low tide they resorted to the extensive +mud flats to feed, though they doubtless fed on the meadows also.</p> + +<p>On Cape Cod they frequent the same localities as in the fall; my +earliest date is April 19 and my latest date for adult birds is June +29. The spring flights here and in New Jersey are made up mainly +of adult birds, mostly in full plumage, but many are mottled and +there are always some “pale bellies,” or young birds.</p> + +<p>The black-bellied plover is an abundant spring migrant up the Mississippi +Valley and through central Canada. We saw it in Saskatchewan +during the last week in May and first week in June. C. G. Harold +tells me that it is abundant around the prairie lakes and sloughs +in Manitoba. Prof. William Rowan (1926) calls it abundant in +Manitoba; his notes mention a flock estimated at about 3,000 seen on +May 23, 1925, at Beaverhill Lake. He says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At our lake it is one of the later arrivals in the spring, seldom appearing +before the middle of May. It stays generally in some numbers till the end of +the month and may linger till the second week of June. Flocks are usually +small, anything up to 30, except when the birds are ready to start on the next +lap north, when they may aggregate many hundreds if not thousands. On May +23, 1925, we estimated the ground covered by a single flock of grey plovers, +knots, and a sprinkling of goldens at about one and a half acres. They were +not scattered, but neither were they closely packed. The grays made up about +75 per cent of the whole. The sitting flock looked like a large patch of snow.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>S. F. Rathbun has sent me the following notes from Washington +which illustrates the abundance of this species on the Pacific coast:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>May 12, 1927. This morning was a dark one with a steady drizzling rain +and light wind following the storm of the preceding two days. On reaching a +very wide expanse of grassy salt meadows bordering the bay we found them +dotted nearly everywhere with many of the smaller sandpipers and black-bellied +plover, the birds being in small and large flocks and mostly grouped around the +many shallow pools with which the meadows were flecked. It was one of the +finest sights we have ever seen where shore-birds were concerned. The beautiful +black-bellied plover in full nuptial dress were scattered over a wide area, rarely +as single birds, but ordinarily a number in company and not infrequently in +flocks of considerable size. One such flock consisted of 50 individuals, shortly +after being joined by another of some 30 birds, the combination of so many large +black-breasted birds making a striking sight. When first alighting the birds +would stand motionless, following which they would then move slowly about, +although at times individuals might take wing, make several turns in the air +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_157">[Pg 157]</span>and then alight among the others on the ground. When in its full plumage this +plover is very noticeable even a long distance off, and when on the ground is +always wary and alert. On alighting if it does not stand motionless, the bird +will immediately move to the nearest height of land, if such there happens to +be, and from such point of vantage will then scan the landscape, and should +there happen to be a number in company you will always find two or three +maintaining a lookout while the remainder move about rather unconcernedly.</p> + +<p>At times associated with the many sandpipers would be a number of knots, +but as a rule this latter species was found in flocks by itself with this exception, +that always with a flock of knots would be one or more black-bellied +plover, such acting as sentinels for the former. And this being the case, the +knots would then unconcernedly feed, as they seemed to rely implicitly on +the plovers’ watchfulness, and we never noted this confidence misplaced. And +this fact must in instances prove the salvation of those shore birds more or +less unsuspicious and having this plover in company, for they seem to be +governed by its actions. Sometimes, with a warning note, the sentinel would +suddenly take wing and instantly was followed by the entire flock of other +birds en masse, and all would then fly about perhaps for a time before once +more alighting on some spot selected by the plover acting as the sentinel. At +one time during our stay there were between three and four thousand of these +plover on the meadows, and we were told that on the preceding day during +the height of the storm this number must have been exceeded.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—I have never seen any signs of courtships during the +spring migration, though I have often looked for it; nor have I ever +seen any mention of it by others. Hence I infer that it is accomplished +after the birds arrive on their breeding grounds. Herbert W. +Brandt says in his Alaska notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>During courtship the male spends considerable time on the wing, speeding +about like a racer; and amid the constant din of wild-fowl notes his cheery whistle +<i>to lee, to lee</i>, is one of the pleasant sounds that greet the ear. But once the +female is incubating her lord becomes as serious and silent as his sober black +waistcoat, so that by early June it seemed as if every plover had left the +country. He carries on his courtship regardless of weather, now mounting +high, the next moment skimming low, with beautiful and bewildering grace, +his wild whistling call meanwhile rising above the din of the storm. The +advance guard of migrants of this plover arrived from the south in a “nor’wester” +on May 7, passing like phantom voyagers, and the next instant were +lost in mid-air in the swirling snow.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Mr. Brandt has sent me the following notes on the +nesting habits of the black-bellied plover in the Hooper Bay region +of Alaska:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>We found this jauntily attired plover the most common nesting species of +the larger shore birds, frequenting the upland rolling tundra, where it preferred +the ridges. It often chose for a nesting site the edge of one of the +more prominent bluffs which formed the margin of the valleys, from which +location the sitting bird could view the entire surrounding country. On these +barren areas, where even the close-cropped moss struggles for existence, the +vegetation is mottled with black and white, and as a consequence the eggs, in +spite of their exposed situation, are very difficult to find. One must almost +touch them to be sure that they are there, so completely do they harmonize +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_158">[Pg 158]</span>with their background. This protective coloration is so perfect that in one +case a bird deserted its nest and the eggs remained unprotected for three +days, during which time jaegers, which were continuously hunting overhead +and about, were, even with their sharp eyes, not able to distinguish them.</p> + +<p>The nest is prepared by the female by scratching out in the moss a circular +depression some 6 inches in diameter and about 1½ inches deep and lining +it with a few white sprigs of reindeer moss. Here she lays her four large +beautiful eggs, each set showing marked variation in size, shape, and markings. +These eggs are distinctive, having a considerably lighter background +than those of the golden plover, while the black markings are not so numerous +and are more evenly distributed.</p> + +<p>They do not nest in proximity to one another, as of the 40 or more nests +observed no two were closer together than a quarter of a mile. The female +is anything but a close sitter and departs from the eminence on which the +nest is situated long before the intruder arrives. If the eggs are fresh, often +neither bird exhibits any interest while a person is at the nest and they do +not even make their appearance as long as he remains in their vicinity. As +the hatching point approaches, however, the birds become more solicitous, +protesting vigorously; the male develops into a militant sentry and rushes +out to meet the intruder, repeatedly whistling <i>lee-ah</i> in a scolding tone, but +staying well out of gun range. He is very combative and drives away any +jaeger or large gull that infringes on his area. The female often leaves her +eggs to join in the attack, and even the swift-flying long-tailed jaeger can not +avoid their onslaughts but beats a hasty retreat. I have seen a male plover +strike a jaeger so hard that it reeled unsteadily in mid-air, but the coward +made no effort to retaliate.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Roderick MacFarlane’s notes contain the records of seven nests +found in the vicinity of Franklin Bay, Mackenzie. The nests were +all found between July 4 and 10, in 1864 and 1865. The first was on +an island in the bay and was “composed of a few withered grasses, +placed in a hole or depression on the side, or face, of a very gentle +eminence.” At least two other nests were on islands. The female +was snared on one nest, but was devoured by a snowy owl, which +also ate the four eggs.</p> + +<p>The nesting habits of the grey plover, as this species is called by +Europeans, are apparently similar to those of our bird. Henry J. +Pearson (1896), who found seven nests on Kolguev, describes them +thus:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The positions of the nests were interesting; only two were on the lower +ground near the Gobista; one was a mile both from the sea and the river; all +the others—also several old nests—were on the tundra not far from the edge +of the bluffs which form the margin of the river basin. Grey plovers seem to +prefer this position, which gives them good posts of observation and allows them +to take their young easily into the marshes below to feed. We found a ready +way of locating the nest of this bird was to watch a pair of Richardson’s skua +hunting over the tundra, for as soon as they approached the nest of the plovers, +both the latter rose into the air and drove the skuas away. We never observed +these birds breeding near each other, each pair appearing to take possession +of about a mile of country. All the nests were slight depressions in the peat, +lined with a little lichen.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_159">[Pg 159]</span></p> + +<p>If the black-bellied plover breeds in Greenland it must be very +rare there, for Dr. W. Elmer Ekblaw tells me that he saw it only +twice during the four years that he spent there. A flock that he saw +on Sutherland Island, south of Etah, on August 17, 1914, was made +up of old and young birds and the latter may have been reared there.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—Mr. Brandt has described the eggs so much better than I +can that I prefer to quote from his notes, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Of the more than 40 nests that we examined of the black-bellied plover each +held four eggs when its complement was completed. Owing to the proportionate +thickness compared with its length the shape of the egg is ovate pyriform +inclining to subpyriform. The shell is strong, finely granular, and on every egg +I have seen the lustre is uniformly dull. The ground color and markings vary +so much that hardly any two sets are the same. This ground color appears to +follow three different shades, which are pinkish, greenish, or brownish. These +types are often quite pronounced when the eggs are fresh, but the delicate +tints fade with age. The pink type ranges from “pale ochraceous salmon” +to “light buff”; the green type is “pale glass green”; while the brown variety +is often as dark as “cinnamon drab.” The eggs are never densely spotted and +are always most heavily marked about the large end, but the very tip of this +end is usually bare of spots, so that, if viewed upon the long axis, a wreath +of spots is observed. These spots are usually medium in size and are distinct, +although in a few unusual examples the spots become confluent at the large +end. The primary markings are irregularly circular and never elongated, while +upon the unusual egg these jet ornaments are of thumb-nail size. In rare +instances the markings assume the form of short penlike scratches which mark +the surface at various angles in the same manner as is occasionally found on +the eggs of other members of the Charadriidae. The spots are uniformly +“blackish brown” to black, but, where the pigment is spread more thinly, +“deep brownish drab” or “dusky drab” tones may be noted, while here and +there “hazel” to “liver brown” may be observed where the pigment is extremely +thin. The underlying spots are never numerous but always present and are +more prominent on some specimens than on others. They vary in tone from +“pale mouse gray” to “deep violet gray,” dependent upon the ground color, +while one specimen with small primary spots is conspicuously beautified with +“chicory blue.” A series of these noble eggs is a study in black and whitish, +and while the individual egg is conspicuous, yet, when resting on their mottled +birthplace, it is evident that nature has most happily endowed them with +protective coloration.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The measurements of 174 eggs average 52.2 by 36.5 millimeters; +the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>58</b> by 38, 55.5 by <b>38.2</b>, +<b>47.5</b> by 34.7 and 51.9 by <b>34</b> millimeters. The measurements of eggs +from different localities do not throw much light on the relationship +of the proposed subspecies; 120 eggs from Hooper Bay average 52.4 +by 36.7, 14 eggs from Franklin Bay average 52 by 36, and 40 eggs +from European localities average 51.6 by 35.9 millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Several observers have proven that both sexes share in +the incubation. Mr. Brandt says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The first downy young appeared on June 21 after an incubation lasting 23 +days, and they were just as inconspicuous and distinctive as were the eggs +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_160">[Pg 160]</span>whence they emerged. At that time both parents were fearless in their defense, +employing all the wing-dragging and distress maneuvers known to +ground-nesting birds. This was exhibited even by the male, which is rather +unusual. The downy young are variegated, sulphur-yellow and black above, +and harmonize well with the abundant yellowish moss of the tundra. They +conceal themselves by lying with head down and with their legs drawn under +their bodies and are thus very difficult to detect.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—In natal down the young black-bellied plover resembles +the young golden plover, except that the band around the neck +and the under parts are purer white. The forehead, crown, and +sides of the head are variegated with black, white, and bright yellows, +varying from “lemon chrome” to “baryta yellow”; the back, +rump, wings, and thighs are mottled with black and the above +shades of yellow; the nape, a broad band around the neck and the +entire under parts are pure white; the cheeks below the eyes are +white bordered below by a black stripe extending from the bill to +the auriculars.</p> + +<p>In fresh juvenal plumage, as seen on the breeding grounds, the +forehead and lores are mainly white; the crown and all the upper +parts of the body are sepia, the feathers broadly tipped or notched +with yellow, varying from “light cadmium yellow” to “light +orange yellow,” the spots being largest and brightest on the rump; +the chin is white, but the rest of the under parts are buffy gray and +pale buff, the feathers of the throat, breast, and flanks with median +dusky streaks and faint dusky tips; the greater wing coverts are +more narrowly edged, but more conspicuously notched than in the +adult. Young birds are in juvenal plumage during migration, but +the yellows have mostly faded to creamy white or white, though +the rump spots are often quite yellow. A partial postjuvenal molt +takes place late in the fall and in winter, involving much of the body +plumage, but generally not the rump and back. Generally the molt +is finished by December, but often not until January; by this time +the light edgings and notches have worn away, giving the bird a very +dark appearance. The first winter plumage is much like the adult +winter, but it can be distinguished by the creamy or golden tips and +notches of the juvenal wing coverts, by the faded yellow spots on +the rump and by some old, worn scapulars and tertials.</p> + +<p>Young birds have an incomplete and very variable first prenuptial +molt, at which the sexes begin to differentiate. Young males acquire +more of the adult nuptial plumage than young females; sometimes +the breasts become almost wholly clear black; but in the upper parts +there is generally only a sprinkling of new, adult, broadly white-tipped +feathers, most of the first winter plumage being retained, with +some old, worn scapulars, tertials, and tails. Young females show +much less black on the breast and much more winter plumage on +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_161">[Pg 161]</span>the back. Young birds apparently renew the primaries in February +and March and the first postnuptial molt, the following summer +and fall, produces the adult winter plumage.</p> + +<p>Adults have a partial prenuptial molt between February and May, +involving the body plumage, usually the tail, some of the wing +coverts and tertials, but not all the scapulars, back and rump feathers. +The complete postnuptial molt, begins with the acquisition of white +feathers in the under body plumage in August and the body molt +lasts through September, while the birds are migrating. The wings +are molted later, from September to December. In winter plumage +the black breast is entirely replaced by dull white, more or less +marked or shaded with pale, ashy brown; and the upper parts are +dull, ashy brown, the feathers tipped with white and subterminally +shaded with blackish brown. No trace of the nuptial body plumage +is left and adults and young look very much alike.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The main feeding grounds of the black-bellied plover along +the coasts are on the broad, tidal, sand flats, and mud flats; there +are many such flats about Chatham and other places on Cape Cod, +where the receding tide leaves many square miles of flat mud or +sand, dotted with little islands of tall marsh grass. These are favorite +resorts for plover, where they may be seen away off on the edge of +the water, perhaps a mile from the shore, feeding on marine worms, +small mollusks, crustaceans, and marine insects. As the advancing +tide drives them in onto the marshes or sand dunes, they find other +food; Mr. Mackay (1892) says that “they feed also on the larvae of +one of the cutworms (Noctuidae) which they obtain on the marshes. +They also eat the large whitish maritime grasshopper (<i>Oedipoda +maritima</i>).”</p> + +<p>In the interior they feed, around the shores of the larger lakes +and on open flats, on various forms of aquatic life. They also resort +to some extent to meadows and upland pastures, where the grass is +short, and to plowed fields; here they do some good by devouring +grasshoppers, locusts, cutworms, grubs, beetles, and earthworms. +They also eat some seeds and berries. Mr. Forbush (1912) says that +Prof. Samuel Aughey found the stomachs of two of these birds +“crammed with the destructive Rocky Mountain locust.”</p> + +<p>Grinnell, Bryant, and Storer (1918) mention a bird taken in California +which had in its stomach “14 small snails, 1 small bivalve +mollusk, and parts of 2 or more small crabs.” I once watched a bird +in Florida, which fed for some time on the broken remains of a dead +crab.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Mr. Brandt, in his notes, pays the following tribute +to the power of flight of this fine bird:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Only those who have met the lordly black-bellied plover on his native heath +can appreciate how he seems to rule with a martial air the domains under +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_162">[Pg 162]</span>his control. Powerful of wing stroke, trim of form as a grayhound, and erect +of carriage, this, the largest of our common plovers, is the athlete of the +wild birds of the North. Neatly vestured in his silvery white and ebony black, +he is the fleetest racer of the air among a field of highly developed specialists. +To consider him swifter than the graceful long-tailed jaeger or the far-ranging +golden plover is indeed a startling claim, but my judgment is that the black-bellied +plover can pass through the air faster than any other feathered creature +in the North. At some time in the future it will be of great interest +for some enterprising ornithologist to test out in his racing aeroplane the +various flying speeds of the northern birds. It is my prediction that the shore +birds will be found to lead the field there, and that the big black-bellied plover +will surpass them all. The Pacific godwit is a wonderful air master, darting +here and there with but the slightest effort, yet our plover seems to have only +one gear, and that high speed. This may be best appreciated during the gales +that are of such frequent occurrence in that storm-swept land. The bird can +quarter, or fly into the teeth of the wind, with such power as almost to +disregard it.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The above picture is not overdrawn, for this plover is one of our +strongest fliers. Migrating flocks fly high in great bunches or massed +formations, after the manner of many ducks. When flying short +distances or when coming in over the flats they fly low and are often +strung out in lines. Their flight seems to me to be steadier or more +duck-like than that of the smaller shore birds. The powerful, pointed +wings move very swiftly; Doctor Oberholser and I once made a number +of accurate counts of the wing beats of this and several other +species in normal flight; eight counts for this plover averaged 240 +beats a minute, or 4 beats a second; the slowest was 225 and the +fastest 250.</p> + +<p>The black-bellied plover is wont to stand erect, with head held +high, in an attitude of dignified yet alert repose; it can be recognized +by its bold outline almost as far as it can be seen, away out +on the shimmering sands. It is a wary sentinel for all of its smaller +companions and it is utterly useless to attempt to approach it in an +open situation. It runs swiftly along at the water’s edge, stopping +frequently to look about or striking quickly at some morsel of food. +Dr. Charles W. Townsend (1905) says that they throw “the feet +well out in front as they run. Their usual stride is 3 or 4 inches, +but I have several times measured tracks that were 6 inches apart.” +It is interesting to watch them bathing; they squat down in shallow +water and spend much time in splashing, fluttering the wings, and +dipping their heads; then comes the drying process, shaking the +water out of the body plumage, flapping wings and wagging tails, +followed by a long period of careful preening. Francis H. Allen +writes to me of another method of bathing, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At one time they took to bathing, one after another, and one pretty little +performance was to fly up about a foot and come splashing down into the water +with much fluttering of wings. One started this play, and another and another +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_163">[Pg 163]</span>took it up till half a dozen or more had gone through it. They also hopped on +one foot in the water, as shore birds so often do on the beach, and, in this, one +set the fashion and others followed it. This hopping altogether seems to be +quite common play with various species.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Like most shore birds, they can swim quite easily, as the following +note from Francis M. Weston will show:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On March 27 I was watching a small flock of black-bellied plovers feeding on +a sand bar at low tide. One of the birds was separated from the others by +a deep pool about 6 feet wide, and, in order to join them, entered the water and +swam across the pool. While in the water, it reminded me very much of a +diminutive gull—it floated high in the “stern” with the forward part of the +body low in the water. The transit of the pool was made so quickly that there +was no time for a detailed study of the bird’s motions. Thinking that the +plover was wounded and had had to swim through lack of ability to fly, I approached +the flock, when all took wing and flew to another bar several hundred +yards distant. An examination of the pool showed that it was more than a foot +deep—far too deep for a bird of that size to wade.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—To my mind the whistle of the black-bellied plover is +one of the sweetest and most fascinating of all the Limicoline voices; +it is not quite as melodious as that of the piping plover, nor is it +quite as startling as the loud call of the yellowlegs; but it heralds +the coming of one of our finest shore birds and hence it produces +a thrill. The sportsman loves to hear it and he can imitate it quite +easily. John T. Nichols has contributed the following notes on it:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The flight note of this species is a clear, mellow, ringing whistle—<i>pe-oo-ee</i>. +Although shortened and otherwise varied at different times, this note is the +only one ordinarily heard from single individuals or small flocks. In general +it may be said that the diagnostic flight or identification note of plovers is used +more extensively than in yellowlegs and other species, for instance, and that +they seem to have less variety of calls.</p> + +<p>A second note heard from a flock of birds either in the air or alighted, and +in chorus when such a flock is flushed, circling and hovering in uncertain manner, +is a soft, mellow <i>quu-hu</i>. A dissimilar unloud <i>cuk cuk cuk, cuk, cuk, cuk +cuk cuk cuk</i> which I heard from a single bird in Florida in September, alighted +with decoys and running about, completes my knowledge of the calls of this +plover.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The ordinary call note, referred to above, has a sweet, mellow, and +plaintive quality, with a tinge of wildness, which enlivens the solitude +of the ocean beaches; I should write it <i>pee-u-wee</i>, the first, loud, +rich, and prolonged, the second lower and shorter, and the third +higher pitched, more plaintive, and softer. Grinnell, Bryant, and +Storer (1918) describe the note as “a loud, ringing <i>wher-rell</i>, far +reaching and, at a distance, clear and mellow in quality.” Dr. E. R. +P. Janvrin tells me that he has “also heard them utter a loud note +resembling that of the common tern, but not so harsh and more +musical, which is apparently an alarm note.”</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The black axillars, on the under side of the wing +next to the body, are very conspicuous when the bird is flying and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_164">[Pg 164]</span>form the most reliable field mark in all plumages. The general outline +of the bird is characteristic, with its large head, short, heavy bill, +and erect carriage. The upper parts are light colored in all plumages, +especially so in spring, the upper tail coverts are nearly white and +there is a white band in the spread wing. In the fully black-breasted +plumage the black of the under parts does not extend so far back as +on the golden plover and the crown is much whiter. The presence +of a hind toe may be detected at a short distance.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The southward migration begins early in July and spreads +out entirely across the continent. Before the end of August the last +of the black-bellied plover have left their breeding grounds. The first +of the adults sometimes reach Massachusetts as early as the second +week in July; my earliest date is July 7; but the main flight comes +in August and most of the adults have left by the middle of September, +though I have seen adults here as late as October 29. The young +birds come later; I have seen them as early as August 10, but they +usually do not come in any numbers until September, and the heaviest +flight is between September 15 and October 15; a few linger into +November. While here they mingle freely with knots, turnstones, +and red-backed sandpipers; any of the smaller sandpipers are likely +to be associated with them.</p> + +<p>Professor Rowan (1923) gives much the same dates for Alberta +and says that the young birds are plentiful through October and +“may stay right into November, even for a week or two after the +lakes have frozen over.” M. P. Skinner tells me that he has seen them +in Yellowstone Park late in September with the thermometer down +to zero. Mr. Rathbun tells me that “the black-bellied plover is a +regular and somewhat common spring and autumn migrant along +the coast of Washington and about Puget Sound.” D. E. Brown’s +notes from that region give dates extending from August 26 to +October 2.</p> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—It is as a game bird that the black-bellied plover or +“beetlehead,” as it is called on Cape Cod, has achieved its greatest +reputation. There is no shore bird that is better known or more +eagerly sought; for it is not only a large plump bird but it is a swift +flier, and one of the wariest, most sagacious, and most difficult of the +beach birds to secure. To meet with any success in shooting this +plover the sportsman must be familiar with its habits in the locality +where he is shooting, must be well concealed in a skillfully made +blind, and must know how to imitate its notes perfectly. The old +black-bellied birds are particularly wary and will not come to the +decoys unless the surroundings are quite natural in appearance. Mr. +Mackay (1892) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>After many unsuccessful attempts to capture them one becomes imbued with +the fact that the old birds are well calculated, under ordinary circumstances, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_165">[Pg 165]</span>to avoid danger; they succumb only to those sportsmen who have served a long +apprenticeship, and who have acquired a knowledge of their habits.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>John C. Cahoon (1888), a veteran gunner and collector, has described +various methods used on Cape Cod, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Stands are built on the meadows and marshes by cutting bushes of about the +proper height and sticking them in the grass or mud so as to form a circle of +convenient size for one or more gunners. If bushes can not be found handily, +dry seaweed, grass, and other materials are sometimes used. On the mud +flats bunches of sedge grass afford concealment, but the most successful method +is to make a bar in the sand flats and sink a box, or dig a pit in the sand. It +requires considerable labor to build and keep a bar in order, also to sink a box. +The bar is laid bare before any of the surrounding flats, consequently the +birds, finding no other feeding place uncovered, fly to the bar. One other way +in which large numbers are sometimes taken is to find out the locality on the +high beaches where they roost during high tide, and digging a hole in the sand +for a place of concealment. They usually come to the same spot to roost each +high tide and by examining the beach these places can be easily found, by the +numerous footprints in the sand. The blind should be completed soon after the +tide begins to flow, as these birds leave the flats as soon as the tide commences +to cover them. For the young, or “pale bellies,” all that is needed is a pit dug +with the sand thrown out around the top edge and a few decoys placed out the +right distance from the pit. For the old “black breasts” it is necessary to have +the top covered over with boards and dry sand spread on them and have an +opening in the sides and front, to shoot from. It is best not to put out any +decoys, as the old birds will seldom alight to decoys on the beaches, even if they +are made to look very natural.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Most of my shooting has been done on the flats or beaches, from +sedge grass or seaweed blinds. On the inner side of Monomoy the +water is very shallow and at dead low tide the birds are away off, +perhaps a mile from shore, on the edge of the water. The flats near +shore are dotted with islands of sedge grass, where the gunner can +easily conceal himself in the tall grass, with the decoys set out on the +open mud. As the tide comes in rapidly over the shallows, preceded +by an advancing line of foam, the birds begin to move, flying up to +the marshes or beaches. A blind may be made on the inner side of +the beach by digging a deep hole in the sand and piling up seaweed +around it. In either case the blind must be in some well-established +fly way between the feeding grounds and the resting places and must +be well enough made to offer good concealment. The best shooting +comes on the first part of the ebb and the latter part of the flood tide. +The gunner must keep out of sight and be ever on the alert, for at +any moment he may hear the wild, ringing cry or see single birds or +small flocks dash by at high speed. They seldom alight to the decoys, +though they often circle over them and are usually much scattered.</p> + +<p>I have often found it good sport to stalk “beetleheads” on the +beaches, where they rest at high tide. One kills very few birds in this +way, as the chances are all in favor of the bird. Young birds are less +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_166">[Pg 166]</span>wary than old blackbreasts and a few can sometimes be obtained by +crawling up back of a sand dune and shooting them as they jump. +This involves plenty of exercise, requires perseverance, and calls for +quick work with the gun, and the bird generally escapes. Walter H. +Rich (1907) has described this very well, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Yet let the gunner peep ever so carefully over the edge of the bank where he +lies hidden and each wary feeder becomes at once a motionless statue. Had he +not seen their animation a moment before he might think he had come upon a +wooden congregation of decoys. While he is still they make no movement, but +let him stir, either for nearer approach or to draw back from view that he may +get a better position, and the instant his head goes out of sight behind the long +salt grass the flock noiselessly takes wing with easy, graceful flight, alighting +some hundreds of yards away to feed comfortably until the dangerous admirer, +with stealthy caution and much toilsome trudging through the shifting sand +dunes, once more approaches too near for safety, when the same performance +again takes place. It makes little difference how the approach is managed, the +result is generally the same; the gunner peers cautiously at the spot where a +moment since the flock was busily feeding, and seeing them not soon discovers +them 200 yards away, apparently just as ready to tease him as before.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—These plover, no longer black bellied now, spend the +winter in the southern United States and from there southward to +central Brazil and Peru. They winter commonly as far north as +South Carolina and the southern half of California, less commonly +in North Carolina, and casually farther north. I have seen them in +immense flocks on the great mud flats among the Florida keys and +we had them with us all winter on the beaches and sandy islands +about Tampa Bay. They showed their sagacity by their confiding +tameness on the protected bathing beaches and by their extreme wildness +on the outer islands, where it was almost impossible to approach +them within gunshot range.</p> + +<p>The gray plover of the Eastern Hemisphere goes as far south in +winter as southern Africa, Madagascar, and Australia. Charles +Barrett, referring to Australia, says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This species sometimes associates in large flocks, but more often is seen +singly, or in pairs, feeding on mud flats and along the sea beaches. It is a wary +bird. Arriving in spring (September) or early summer in the southern portions +of the continent it becomes widely distributed, but seems to restrict itself mainly +to the seashore. However, it does wander inland at times, having been recorded, +for example, from the midlands of Tasmania. It leaves Australia apparently in +March or April (autumn) on the northern flight to its breeding haunts.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Cosmopolitan.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The breeding range of the black-bellied plover +in North America is confined to the Arctic coast north to Alaska +(Wainwright, Point Barrow, Colville River delta, Barter Island, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_167">[Pg 167]</span>Collinson Point, and probably Demarcation Point); northern Mackenzie +(Cape Bathurst and probably Cape Kellett); Victoria Land +(Taylor Island); and Franklin (Fury Point and Melville Peninsula), +East to Franklin (Melville Peninsula); possibly Keewatin (Cape +Fullerton); and possibly Greenland (Sutherland Island). South to +possibly Keewatin (Cape Fullerton); Mackenzie (probably Bernard +Harbor, Colville Hills, and Franklin Bay); and Alaska (Hooper +Bay). West to Alaska (Hooper Bay and Wainwright).</p> + +<p>In common with several other shore birds, nonbreeding specimens +of this species are frequently found during the summer months at +points far south of the breeding grounds. At this season they have +been taken or observed in Maine (Western Egg Rock); Massachusetts +(Monomoy Island, Marthas Vineyard, and Harvard); New York +(Quogue, Freeport, Rockaway, Long Beach, and Geneva); New +Jersey (Tuckerton, Great Bay, and Absecon Bay); Ohio (Bay +Point); Virginia (Cobb Island and Cape Charles region); South +Carolina (Mount Pleasant, Magnolia Beach, and White Point +Swash); Florida (Fort De Soto, Amelia Island, Key West, Fernandina, +and Daytona Beach); Alabama (Dauphin Island); Louisiana +(Breton Island); Texas (Corpus Christi); Jamaica (Port +Henderson); and the Galapagos Islands.</p> + +<p>In the Palaearctic region it breeds from the eastern tundras of +Arctic Europe eastward throughout Arctic Asia to Kamchatka and +on Kolguev and the Siberian Islands.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The American winter range extends north to +Washington (Strait of Juan de Fuca, and Dungeness Spit); Texas +(Brownsville, Corpus Christi, Rockport, and Matagorda); Louisiana +(Breton Islands); Alabama (Dauphin Island); and Virginia +(Wallops Island). East to Virginia (Wallops Island and Sandy +Island); North Carolina (Pea Island and Southport); South +Carolina (Mount Pleasant and Port Royal); Georgia (Darien, +Cumberland, and St. Marys); Florida (Amelia Island, Fort George, +Seabreeze, Mosquito Inlet, Lake Okeechobee, Miami, and Upper +Matecumbe Key); the Bahama Islands (Abaco, Eleuthera, Watling, +Acklin, and Great Inagua); Haiti (Monte Christi); probably French +Guiana (Cayenne); and Brazil (Cajetuba and the Amazon region). +South to Brazil (Amazon region); and Peru (Callao). West to Peru +(Callao, Chimbote, and Tumbez); Ecuador (Bay of Santa Elena); +the Galapagos Islands (Albemarle); Colombia (Cartagena); probably +Costa Rica (mouth of the Martina River); probably Guatemala +(Chiapam); Oaxaca (San Mateo); Lower California (San Jose del +Cabo, La Paz, and San Geronimo Island); California (Coronado, +Wilmington, Santa Cruz Island, Los Banos, San Francisco, and +mouth of Eel River); Oregon (Newport); and Washington (Point +Chehalis and Strait of Juan de Fuca).</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_168">[Pg 168]</span></p> + +<p>Three specimens at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, in December, 1872, +constitute the only winter record for that region.</p> + +<p>In the eastern hemisphere it winters from the coasts of southern +Europe and Asia to southern Africa, Madagascar, the Seychelles, +and Australia.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: Pennsylvania, +Neville Island, April 26; New Jersey, Atlantic City, April +27, Cape May, April 30, and Ocean City, May 5; New York, Montauk +Point Light, April 30, Great South Bay, May 1, and Long Beach, +May 2; Rhode Island, South Auburn, April 23, and Newport, May +9; Massachusetts, Cape Cod, April 19, Monomoy Island, April 22, +and Billingsgate, April 27; Nova Scotia, Pictou, May 17; Missouri, +Courtney, April 1, and Concordia, April 19; Illinois, Hennepin, +April 2, and Rantoul, April 16; Indiana, Knox County, March 30; +Ohio, Oberlin, April 24; Michigan, Forestville, May 2; Ontario, +Toronto, May 11, and Oshawa, May 14; Iowa, Keokuk, April 22, +Sioux City, May 8, and New Hampton, May 12; Wisconsin, Racine, +April 14, and Leeds Center, April 17; Minnesota, Heron Lake, April +21, and Hutchinson, May 7; Nebraska, Vesta, April 21, and Lincoln, +May 10; South Dakota, Pitrodie, May 1, and Vermilion, May 3; +North Dakota, Rice Lake, May 5, Bathgate, May 9, and Harrisburg, +May 10; Manitoba, Margaret, May 5, and Whitewater, May 20; +Saskatchewan, Wiseton, May 4, and Indian Head, May 9; Mackenzie, +Fort Resolution, June 2; Colorado, Denver, May 11, and Loveland, +May 14; Utah, Provo, May 11; Alberta, Camrose, May 1, Sturgeon +River, May 12, Tofield, May 19, Veteran, May 22, and Fort Chipewyan, +May 23; British Columbia, Comox, April 23, and Courtenay, +April 24; Yukon, Dawson, May 20; and Alaska, Kuiu Island, May 3, +Fort Kenai, May 6, Hooper Bay, May 9, and mouth of the Yukon +River, May 12.</p> + +<p>Last dates of spring departure are: Panama, mouth of the Rio +Venado, March 27; Bahama Islands, Andros, April 14; Green Cay, +April 29, and Nassau, April 28; Florida, St. Marks, May 8, New +Smyrna, May 14, Pensacola, May 16, Daytona Beach, May 24, and +Cedar Keys, May 27; Alabama, Dauphin Island, May 19; Georgia, +Savannah, May 13; South Carolina, Frogmore, May 17, and Hilton +Head, May 24; North Carolina, Cape Hatteras, May 20, and Churchs +Island, May 30; Virginia, Cobb Island, May 19, and Wallops Island, +May 26; Maryland, Dulaneys Valley, May 13; Pennsylvania, Erie, +May 19; New Jersey, Cape May County, May 23, and Elizabeth, May +30; New York, Jamaica, May 26, Lake Canandaigua, May 30, and +Orient Point, May 30; Connecticut, Westport, May 28, Fairfield, +May 30, and Norwalk, June 1; Rhode Island, Block Island, May +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_169">[Pg 169]</span>29, and South Auburn, June 5; Massachusetts, Ipswich, May 30, +Dennis, June 2, and Cape Cod, June 6; Quebec, Godbout, June 9; +Louisiana, Mermerton, May 2; Missouri, Concordia, May 23; Kentucky, +Bowling Green, June 3; Illinois, Chicago, May 26, and Waukegan, +May 27; Indiana, Indianapolis, May 30; Ohio, Oberlin, May +22, Youngstown, May 23, and Painesville, May 27; Michigan, Detroit, +May 26, Jackson, May 28, and Charity Island, June 1; Ontario, +Bowmanville, May 25, Toronto, May 26, Kingston, May 30; Iowa, +Emmetsburg, May 25, National, May 26, and Sioux City, May 31; +Wisconsin, Shiocton, May 27, and Madison, May 30; Minnesota, +Waseca, May 24, Hallock, May 26, and Heron Lake, June 2; Texas, +Point Isabel, June 2, and Corpus Christi, June 7; Oklahoma, Norman, +May 25; Kansas, Wichita County, May 22; Nebraska, Alda, +May 21; South Dakota, Vermilion, May 24, and Forestburg, June 1; +North Dakota, Jamestown, May 15, Towner County, May 25, and +Jerusalem, June 1; Manitoba, Margaret, May 31, and Shoal Lake, +June 3; Saskatchewan, Hay Lake, June 2, and Kutanajan Lake, +June 10; Colorado, Denver, May 30; Montana, Baker, May 23; +Alberta, Flagstaff, June 1, and Fort Chipewyan, June 8; Yucatan, +Cozumel Island, April 18; Oaxaca, San Mateo del Mar, May 15; +Vera Cruz, Tampico, April 10; Lower California, San Geronimo +Island, April 14, and San Quentin, May 10; California, Alameda, +May 21, and Santa Barbara, May 26; Washington, “east side of +mountains,” May 18; and British Columbia, Masset, June 16.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of fall arrival are: British Columbia, +Comox, July 5; Oregon, coastal region, July 26; California, Venice, +July 4; Alameda, July 22, and Santa Barbara, July 24; Alberta, +Alliance, August 3; Colorado, Denver, August 21, and Barr, August +31; Saskatchewan, Kiddleston, July 7, and Last Mountain Lake, +August 19; Manitoba, Oak Lake, July 31, and Shoal Lake, August 8; +North Dakota, Grafton, August 23; South Dakota, Forestburg, +August 11; Nebraska, Lincoln, August 7; Texas, Rockport, August +12, Tivoli, August 15, and San Angelo, August 31; Wisconsin, Lake +Koshkonong, August 14; Iowa, Burlington, August 13; Ontario, +Toronto, July 23, Beamsville, August 2, and Hamilton, August 9; +Michigan, Little Lake, July 24, Greenville, August 10, and Charity +Island, August 20; Ohio, Painesville, August 12, and Columbus, +August 23; Indiana, Millers, August 8; Illinois, La Grange, August +21, and Chicago, August 24; Quebec, Godbout, July 30, and Bras +d’Or, August 5; Maine, Portland, July 31; Massachusetts, Essex, +July 18, Attleboro Falls, July 21, and Monomoy Island, July 7; +Rhode Island, Point Judith, July 12, and South Auburn, August 13; +New York, Quogue, July 1, Montauk Point Light, July 20, Orient, +July 24, and Shinnecock Bay, August 5; New Jersey, Great Bay, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_170">[Pg 170]</span>July 19, Stone Harbor, July 22, and Cape May, July 27; Pennsylvania, +Erie, August 1, and Whites Island, August 10; Maryland, +Plum Point, August 10; Virginia, Cobb Island, August 19; North +Carolina, Charlotte Inlet, July 4, Cape Fear, July 7, and Carolina +Beach, July 10; Georgia, Savannah, August 12; Alabama, Dauphin, +and Petit Bois Islands, August 21; Florida, Key West, August 8, +Daytona Beach, August 17, and Pensacola, August 28; and Lesser +Antilles, Barbados, August 22, and Grenada, August 27.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Alaska, Wainwright, September +13, Taku River, September 26, Kenai River, October 7, and Craig, +November 14; British Columbia, Okanagan Landing, September 28, +and Chilliwack, October 23; Alberta, Vermilion-Innisfrea, September +16, and Whitford Lake, October 29; Montana, Priest Butte +Lakes, September 4; Colorado, Fort Collins, October 28, and Denver, +November 13; Mackenzie, Great Bear Lake, September 5, and Fort +Simpson, September 17; Keewatin, Swampy Lake, September 5; +Manitoba, Oak Lake, October 31; North Dakota, Grafton, October +27; South Dakota, Fort Sisseton, October 25, and Sioux Falls, +November 7; Nebraska, Lincoln, October 21; Kansas, Hamilton, +October 13, and Lawrence, October 29; Minnesota, Minneapolis, +October 28; Wisconsin, Lake Mills, October 2; Iowa, Keokuk, +October 28, and Sioux City, November 3; Ontario, Point Pelee, +October 18, Ottawa, November 11, and Kingston, November 16; +Michigan, Detroit, November 3, Sault Ste. Marie, November 5, and +Charity Island, November 21; Ohio, Youngstown, November 11, +Painesville, November 29; Illinois, Chicago, November 3, and La +Grange, November 6; Missouri, Independence, November 5, and +Courtney, November 9; Franklin, Winter Island, August 17; Nova +Scotia, Pictou, October 11, and Wolfville, November 8; Quebec, +Montreal, November 1, and Tabusintoc, November 3; Massachusetts, +Monomoy Island, November 14, and Boston, November 29; Connecticut, +South Norwalk, November 7; New York, Orient, November +26, and Long Beach, November 26; New Jersey, Sandy Hook, +October 25, and Cape May County, November 7; and Pennsylvania, +Erie, November 10.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—Two specimens of the black-bellied plover were +obtained on Clipperton Island, November 19, 1901; Gundlach reported +taking two at San Juan Bay, Porto Rico, Stahl had two +others, while F. A. Potts saw one near Central Aguirre on September +9 and 10, 1921, and a flock of six or seven noted on several occasions +near Salinas, during December, 1920; the species is of casual +occurrence in Bermuda (Mangrove Bay, September 5, 1848, Sand +Hills, November 5, 1874, and Warnick Camp, November 13, 1874); +both Reinhardt and Hagerup record them from Greenland; and +one (possibly the European form) was obtained in late October, at +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_171">[Pg 171]</span>Kaalualu, Hawaii (Henshaw). Although seemingly on the regular +migration route, the only records for Arkansas are two specimens +taken at Fort Smith, September 19, 1892.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Bering Sea coast of Alaska: 24 records, May 27 to +June 4; 16 records, May 29 and 30. Arctic coasts of Alaska and +Canada: 26 records, June 10 to July 11; 13 records, June 28 to +July 5.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Golden"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">PLUVIALIS APRICARIA ALTIFRONS</span> <span class="smaller">(Brehm)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">EUROPEAN GOLDEN PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The claim of the golden plover of Europe to a place in the American +list rests on its occurrence not infrequently in Greenland. The +latest authority on Greenland birds, Mr. E. Lehn Schiöler, in his +great work <i>Danmarks Fugle</i> (<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 2), refers the Greenland birds to +the northern race of European golden plover, <i>Pluvialis apricarius +altifrons</i> (Brehm). It is now generally agreed that there are two races +of this species, and that the black breast is more strongly developed +on the northern form, while the southern race, <i>P. apricarius apricarius</i> +(Linnaeus) has only a marbling of black on the breast in +spring. In Greenland it has occurred both on the east and west +sides, but has not been proved to breed there though suspected of +doing so.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—In the British Isles the northern golden plovers are +said by Abel Chapman to arrive in Northumberland as early as mid +February, spreading over the lower ground and remaining in packs, +while the breeding birds arrive later and are soon distributed over +the moors in pairs. While the southern birds remain on the moorlands +to breed, the northern visitors pass on to their nesting grounds +in the Faroes, Iceland, and Scandinavia.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—Our information is, as might be expected, scanty, +owing to the inaccessible nature of its breeding ground and its retiring +habits. Abel Chapman (1889) describes the loud wild spring +call, which he renders as <i>tirr-pee-you</i>, and adds that after this has +ceased one hears only the well-known plaintive pipe of alarm and a +peculiar rippling song or warble which is wholly indescribable. +This, he says, is the joyous note of courtship and is analogous to the +drumming of the snipe, etc. A fuller description is that of Seton +Gordon (1915) who writes as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>During the season of courtship and indeed up to June is heard the song of +the golden plover and this song is one of the most striking things in the habits +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_172">[Pg 172]</span>of moorland birds. Before commencing to sing the cock bird mounts into the +air to a height of at least 100 feet and flies slowly, deliberately around the spot +where his mate is listening to him below, uttering as he flies a musical whistling +cry of two syllables sounding like <i>whee-wheeu</i>, the last being long drawn out. +His flight during this time is quite distinctive, he no longer cleaves the air with +sharp and rapid wing beats, but moves his wings with slow deliberate strokes, +holding them V-shaped for an instant between the beats. Should he cease his +song—even for a few moments—the normal flight is at once resumed. His cry +on these occasions carries over a great stretch of moor, and I think can be +heard at a greater distance even than the vibrating notes of the curlew. After +some time, during which these long-drawn whistles are regularly continued, the +singer shoots earthward, uttering, just as he is reaching the ground, a curious +purring cry, repeated rapidly five or six times. On paper the sounds resemble +<i>trooeu, trooeu, trooeu</i>. These descriptions apply strictly to the southern race, +but the habits of the two forms in the breeding season are identical and +the Icelandic birds perform their song flights in the same way as the Scotch +birds. Hantzsch points out very justly that the golden plover is not at all quarrelsome +in disposition, and though rival males may vie in song with one another +they meet frequently quite amicably and the natives have long noted the toleration +which the plover extends to the dunlin and which has earned for the latter +the name Loa-thraoll, or, as our forefathers put it, Plover’s-page.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—There is no concealment about the nest; the vast expanses +of moorland or tundra are sufficient protection. Sometimes +the nest hollow may be found on a tiny hillock, sometimes in wiry +grass or among sparse or burnt heather. Such lining as there is +is usually scanty and consists of the materials at hand, leaves, bents, +or a bit of heather stem. Unoccupied scrapes may generally be +found near at hand. Even where the birds are plentiful, as in some +parts of Iceland, the nests are generally a considerable distance +apart.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—Normally four in number, occasionally three only, especially +in late layings. Hantzsch (1905) records one instance of five +in a nest, and five have also been met with in the southern race. They +are pyriform and laid with the points meeting and are very beautiful. +The ground varies from a pale greenish blue to very rich and +warm shades of creamy brown, to almost orange, tinged brownish, +heavily blotched with irregular markings of deep chocolate or blackish. +The measurements of 40 eggs from Iceland average 52.3 by 35.2 +millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>55.1</b> by +36.4, 51.6 by <b>38.3</b>, <b>49.2</b> by 33.8 and 52.3 by <b>33.2</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p>Incubation is carried on by both sexes, as Alfred Taylor has +watched the male and female change places on the eggs. This explains +the rather contradictory accounts from various authors. +H. H. Slater, Seebohm, and R. Collett only shot males from the nest, +while Saxby, Hantzsch, and Heatherley only saw the female on the +eggs. Miss F. Pitt only noted the male on the eggs during the last +week of incubation, but flushed the hen once at an earlier period. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_173">[Pg 173]</span>Early estimates of 16 and 20 days as the incubation period are certainly +erroneous. F. Heatherley watched one nest for 24 days, but +the eggs were probably laid some days earlier and in an incubator +one egg hatched on the 27th day (W. Evans). Although such wary +birds, it occasionally happens that a nest is placed in a hollow of the +ground from which no view of the country is possible to the sitting +bird. Riding at night suddenly up to a nest of this kind in Iceland, +we found the incubating bird did not stir from the eggs while three +men and ponies stood round, and it was not until a hand was placed +within 3 inches that the bird flew off. As a rule, the melancholy +piping note is the first intimation of the presence of a breeding pair +and shows that they are on the alert.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—The young leave the nest as soon as their down is dried +and are cared for by both sexes. They grow very fast, and Hantzsch +states that after 10 or 14 days they can flutter a little way, but the full +flying period is about 4 weeks.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The plumages and molts are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds, edited by H. F. Witherby +(1920).</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—On its breeding grounds the food consists of insects, chiefly +Coleoptera (<i>Notiophilus</i>, <i>Agriotes</i>, <i>Sitones</i>, <i>Curculio</i> and larvae); +Lepidoptera (<i>Agrotis</i>); larvae and imagines of Diptera, Hymenoptera +(<i>Formica</i> and <i>Forficula</i>); also Mollusca (small terrestrial species, +snails and slugs); Aunclida (earthworms) and Arachnida (spiders). +On migration and in winter quarters it has been recorded as eating +marine mollusca (<i>Vitrina</i>, <i>Littorina</i>, <i>Rissoa</i>, <i>Lacuna</i>, etc., and fry of +<i>Mytilus edulis</i>), also small crustacea (Isopoda) and seeds of various +plants (<i>Glaux maritima</i>, <i>Carex</i>, <i>Polygonum</i>, etc.), and berries of +<i>Rhamnus</i>, <i>Vaccinium</i>, <i>Empetrum</i>, etc.; also seaweeds (Algae).</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Outside the breeding season the golden plover is a gregarious +bird, nearly always to be met with in flocks of varying sizes +and often associating with flocks of lapwings and feeding together. +On the alarm being given, both species take to wing, but in characteristically +different ways. The golden plover rise together and form +a compact body, maneuvering together in any direction, while the +lapwings rise gradually in an unwieldy mass, which breaks up from +time to time and the component parts move in different directions. +The pointed wings and more rapid strokes of the golden plover also +contrast strongly with the slow, flappy, irregular flight of the lapwing. +When on migration the golden plovers often adopt a loose +<span class="sansserif">V</span>-shaped formation.</p> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—The peregrine occasionally takes toll of the flocks in the +autumn and spring months, while the skua gulls, or jaegers, and in +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_174">[Pg 174]</span>some districts the hooded crows, destroy eggs or young. The fox, no +doubt, occasionally snaps up an isolated nest of eggs or young.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—About the end of October or early in November the flocks +of northern golden plover arrive on the marshes of the east coast of +England, sometimes in enormous numbers, but their length of stay is +determined by weather conditions, to which they are very susceptible, +showing extreme restlessness before the approach of stormy or windy +weather and leaving the district altogether in hard winters.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—Many birds winter on the coast of the British Isles unless +the weather is severe, feeding chiefly on small marine mollusca but, +as a rule, avoid the mud flats, which are the favorite resort of the grey +plover (<i>Squatarola</i>), except occasionally in very dry weather, feeding +chiefly on the pasture lands and in the wheat fields in the daytime +and leaving at dark for the higher ground.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The northern race breeds in Iceland, the Faroes, +probably a pair or two on Bear Island, northern Scandinavia, Finland, +and North Russia and Siberia to the Yenisei. The southern +race breeds in the mountainous parts of the British Isles, southern +Scandinavia, Denmark, sparingly in Belgium, Holland, and North +Germany, and in Russia south to the Perm Government.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—It is not possible to separate the winter ranges of +the two forms at present, but golden plover migrate across Europe +to the Mediterranean and north Africa, occasionally visiting the +Atlantic isles, and are said to have occurred in the Gabun on the +west and Somaliland and Lama in East Africa; in Asia its limits are +Aden, Baluchistan, and Sind.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—At the Straits of Gibraltar the northern +migrants pass in February and March (late date March 6, L. H. +Irby), but on the Portuguese coast W. C. Tait states that they leave +at the end of February. In the eastern Mediterranean the passage +is noted at Cyprus in early March. At Heligoland Gätke says they +arrive during May and early June on their way to Scandinavia, but +the Icelandic flocks arrive about mid-April as a rule.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—On the southward migration Gätke records the +arrival of the birds of the year as early as July, but adds that the +old birds only begin to arrive toward the end of October. On the +west side of the Mediterranean Tait records the arrival of the earliest +birds in October, but the main passage in November; and Farier +also notes the passage at Tangier in October and November; while +on the eastern side they reach Cyprus about the beginning of +November.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_175">[Pg 175]</span></p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—Fischer recorded a pair on Jan Mayen on June +29, 1883, and it has occurred on the Azores, but is only a rare straggler, +Madeira (recorded by Harcourt and also by Schmitz on January 13, +1896) and the Canaries, where Bannerman describes it as a rare +visitor (records scanty and indefinite).</p> + +<p>In Africa records from the Cape (J. Verreaux), Lamu, East +Africa (Layard), and the Gabun (Du Chaillu) require substantiation. +It is also stated to have occurred in Somaliland, but the +normal winter quarters lie north of these localities. In Asia it has +been shot at Gwadar, Baluchistan, in January, 1872, by W. T. Blanford, +and one was obtained by Brooks near Schwan on January 27, +1878, as well as a second at Karachi on January 7, 1919, by Captain +Hanna. The only other Indian record is one obtained by Reid at +Lucknow. In Greenland (several records).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Iceland: May 21 to June 1 (5 dates); June 2 to 29 (18 +dates). North Norway, June 10 to 20 (5 dates). North Russia and +Siberia, June 10 to July 1 (10 dates). Most eggs of the southern +race are laid in the British Isles from May 10 onward, but exceptionally +eggs have been met with from April 16 to the end of that +month, and in Friesland eggs have been taken on April 19.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Am_gold"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">PLUVIALIS DOMINICA DOMINICA</span> <span class="smaller">(Müller)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">AMERICAN GOLDEN PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The golden plover is not only one of our most beautiful shore +birds in its brilliant spring plumage, but its wonderful migration +excites our admiration and the comparison of its former abundance +with its present scarcity furnishes a striking picture of the ruthless +slaughter that has squandered our previous wealth of wild life. A +few quotations will serve to illustrate the enormous flights of golden +plover that swarmed over both American continents during the past +century. Robert B. Roosevelt (1884) thus refers to a flock he saw +near Montauk Point, Long Island, many years ago:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A gentle hollow spreads before us for several acres literally covered with the +ranks of the much-desired, the matchless golden plover. As they stand in +serried legions, the white mark on their heads gives a strange checkered weirdness +to the phalanx; and we involuntarily pause, spellbound by the novelty of +the spectacle. Our host himself, though an old hand, owns that he has never +before gazed on such a sight. There they stand, with heads erect and bodies +motionless, just out of gunshot. Their number is computed by our companion to +be not less than 3,000, closely packed, and apparently awaiting our onset. +Warily crawling to within 70 yards, we halt as we see unmistakable evidences of +uneasiness and suspicion among the crowded ranks. They stoop, they run, they +rise with “a sounding roar,” to which the united report of our four barrels +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_176">[Pg 176]</span>savagely responds. Away, away with headlong speed scatters and dissolves that +multitudinous host, and we hasten to secure our spoils.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Writing of conditions in Argentina about the middle of the last +century, W. H. Hudson (1922) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The golden plover was then one of the abundant species. After its arrival +in September, the plains in the neighborhood of my home were peopled with +immense flocks of this bird. Sometimes in hot summers the streams and +marshes would mostly dry up, and the aquatic-bird population, the plover included, +would shift their quarters to other districts. During one of these +droughty seasons, when my age was 9, there was a marshy ground 2 miles +from my home where a few small pools of water still remained, and to this +spot the golden plover would resort every day at noon. They would appear +in flocks from all quarters, flying to it like starlings in England coming in +to some great roosting center on a winter evening. I would then mount my +pony and gallop off joyfully to witness the spectacle. Long before coming in +sight of them the noise of their voices would be audible, growing louder as I +drew near. Coming to the ground, I would pull up my horse and sit gazing +with astonishment and delight at the spectacle of that immense multitude of +birds, covering an area of 2 or 3 acres, looking less like a vast flock than a +floor of birds, in color a rich deep brown, in strong contrast to the pale +gray of the dried-up ground all round them. A living, moving floor and a +sounding one as well, and the sound, too, was amazing. It was like the sea, +but unlike it in character since it was not deep; it was more like the wind +blowing, let us say, on thousands of tight-drawn wires of varying thicknesses, +vibrating them to shrill sound, a mass and tangle of 10,000 sounds. +But it is indescribable and unimaginable.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Edward H. Forbush (1912) tells of two men who killed plover +enough to fill a tip car two-thirds full in one day, during a big +storm on Nantucket in the forties. Again he speaks of a great flight +which occurred there on August 29, 1863, “when golden plover and +Eskimo curlew landed on the island in such numbers as to almost +darken the sun. Between seven and eight thousand of these birds +were killed on the island and on Tuckernuck.” He says that from +1860 on the species began to decrease, due to the demand created +by the failing supply of passenger pigeons, and that in 1890 alone +two Boston firms received from the West 40 barrels closely packed +with curlew and plover, with 25 dozen curlew and 60 dozen plover +to the barrel.</p> + +<p>By the end of the last century this species had about reached +its lowest ebb; it had become scarce where it once abounded; no +more big flights occurred; and in many places it was rarely seen. +But protective measures came in time to save it from extermination; +the stopping of the sale of game and the removal of this species +from the game-bird list were badly needed. Since the last move +was made the species has shown some signs of recovery. Edwin +Beaupre (1917) says that “after an absence of almost 15 years, the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_177">[Pg 177]</span>golden plover has apparently resumed its migratory visits to eastern +Ontario.” Prof. William Rowan (1923) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This year has been an exceptional golden-plover year. At the place referred +to above, somewhere over a thousand birds were seen on the 20th of +May alone, in moving flocks varying in number from 30 individuals to several +hundreds. This was evidently not unique; for about the same time I got a +report from quite another part of the Province that this species was unusually +abundant, while from yet another quarter I got a very good description of +the bird in a letter with a request that I name it for the inquirer, a careful +bird observer. Her comment was that she had never seen the species before, +but that it was, at the time of writing, present on the plowed fields in enormous +numbers.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>And John T. Nichols tells me that “of recent years there has been +a distinct increase” on Long Island. If shooting conditions in its +winter home could be controlled, its future would be assured.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—From its winter home on the pampas of Argentina and +Uruguay the golden plover starts early on its long northward migration. +Dr. Alexander Wetmore (1926) noted that—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The northward migration began with a flock of nine seen January 23, 1921, +at a little fresh-water pool on the beach near La Paloma, Uruguay; when flushed +these passed on to the west. Single individuals were seen near San Vicente, Uruguay, +in flight toward the northwest on January 24 and 30. At Lazcano, Uruguay, +birds in passage north were seen in early morning on February 7 and 8, and +one was recorded February 18 at Rio Negro, Uruguay. On March 8 at Guamini, +Buenos Aires, 15 came in at dusk to roost on a little mud bar in company +with Hudsonian godwits. The migration seemed almost at an end then, as +later I saw only four at Tunuyan, Mendoza, on March 23; and on April 5 +only a few were heard calling with other shore birds in flight northward over +Tucuman, Tucuman.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The exact route followed through the interior of South America +is not definitely known, but it is not known to migrate along either +coast of that continent. Austin H. Clark (1905) has advanced the +theory that it prefers to fly with a beam wind and that it selects the +route over which the prevailing winds will produce this condition. +He suggests the following as the probable route:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In returning the birds would first go north (across the prevailing westerlies) +until in the vicinity of Buenos Aires and the country just to the west of it, +where they would encounter northeasterly winds, which would turn them +inland, up the valley of the La Plata and along the plains to the east of the +Andes, the course gradually becoming more northerly, and then northeasterly +in the area covered by the southeast trades. They would reach the Amazon +Valley in its western half, and then under the guidance of the northeast trades +fly northwest toward the Isthmus of Panama and Central America. The +course from here would be northwest across the trades to Texas and the Mississippi +Valley. The birds follow up this valley northward and then, on +reaching Canada, fly northwest across the prevailing southwesterly and westerly +winds to their breeding grounds in western Arctic America.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_178">[Pg 178]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Another theory advanced by Prof. Wells W. Cooke (1912), into +which the facts seem to fit equally well, is that—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Birds follow that route between the winter and summer homes that is the +shortest and at the same time furnishes an abundant food supply. The plover +seeks the shortest treeless route overland, and alighting on the coast of Texas +travels leisurely over the Mississippi Valley prairies, which are abundantly +supplied with food, to the plains of the Saskatchewan, and thence to the Arctic +coast. Not until Texas is reached can the movements of the golden plover be +definitely traced, and at no place between Peru and Texas has it ever been +recorded as common. In fact, the records as they stand are what they should +be if the plover escapes the forested regions of northern South America and +Central America by a single flight of from 2,000 to 2,500 miles from the valleys +of eastern Peru to the treeless prairies of Texas.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The golden plover is practically unknown west of the Rocky Mountains +in the spring; it has always been a rare straggler on the Atlantic +coast at this season; and even as far east as Ohio it rarely occurs. +Its main route is through the prairie regions west of the Mississippi +River. I have seen what was probably the last of the migration, +during the first week of May, along the coastal prairies of Texas, and +have watched the late spring flight in Saskatchewan during the last +week in May; probably I missed the heaviest part of the flight in both +cases. On May 26 to 28, 1917, while driving about Quill Lake, Saskatchewan, +I had a good chance to observe a considerable flight of +these beautiful birds, all apparently in full spring plumage. The +flocks appeared from the southward during the early forenoon, flying +swiftly in ever-changing formations, rising to a height of 30 or 40 +feet and then sweeping low close to the ground. They all seemed +to follow the same course over the burnt-over prairies and the freshly +plowed and harrowed lands near the shore of the lake. Occasionally +a flock would stop and scatter about to feed; their black bellies and +golden-spangled backs were surprisingly inconspicuous on the black +ground and among the yellow stubble. They were very shy and restless, +constantly on the move, and if followed up too closely they were +on the wing again and soon disappeared over the northern horizon. +It was almost impossible to approach them on foot when they were +on the ground, though a flock would occasionally fly by within gunshot. +One that I shot on the ground was 75 paces away, measured +distance. Some of the flocks were accompanied by a few buff-breasted +sandpipers.</p> + +<p>Professor Rowan (1926) says that in Alberta:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The arrival of this species at our lake is precipitate, for there may be none +to-day and hundreds to-morrow. The flocks would appear to arrive by night, for +they are there at daybreak, when one usually takes the first walk around. They +are not birds of the shore line in the spring, but like the buff-breasted sandpiper, +they seem nevertheless chiefly to frequent country adjacent to some large lake. +This, together with their mode of arrival, in considerable flocks and evidently +at night, suggests that they have traveled a considerable distance from their +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_179">[Pg 179]</span>last stopping place. They stay with us some days and then go in the manner +in which they came, <i>en masse</i>. We have no records earlier than May 8 when +the birds may first be expected, but the main contingent arrives nearer the 16th +or 17th, while by the 23d or 24th they have usually all gone. Their period with +us is therefore brief as compared with the majority of shore birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The remainder of the journey is quickly completed, for, at Point +Barrow, John Murdoch (1885) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They are among the earlier waders to arrive, as stragglers generally appear +about the 20th to the 25th of May, before there is much bare ground. In 1882 +a small party in full breeding plumage, and apparently all males, arrived May +21, but no more arrived until June 11. The tundra was at this time bare only +along the edge of the beach, and the ice and snow was not yet gone from the +lagoons. This party remained in nearly the same place for a couple of weeks, +feeding on small red worms which they found in marshy spots, and all but two +of them were taken, although they were very wild.</p> + +<p>Along through the first and second week in June they continued to arrive in +small parties, and from that time on are quite plenty scattered in pairs and +threes all over the tundra. They are very wild and difficult to approach, and +very noisy. In addition to their ordinary well-known call note, they have in +the breeding season, a loud but very melodious cry of <i>tud’ling!</i> many times +repeated, uttered as the bird flies along rather high, with long slow strokes of +the wings.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Roderick MacFarlane was very successful in finding +nests of golden plover in the Anderson River region and other parts +of the Arctic barren grounds. He sent a large number of eggs to +Washington and I find in his notes references to over 120 nests, on +which some data were given, mostly very brief. He says that +“golden plover were in great abundance in the barren grounds, as +well as along the Arctic coast. They seldom or never nested in the +wooded country, though a few specimens were found on the open +plains or commons, which occur on the borders of that tract.” Some +of the nests on the Arctic coast were “near the beach” or even +“within a few yards of the sea water.” The nests were evidently +mere hollows in the open tundra, lined with dead leaves; there were +no attempts at concealment, but the protective coloring of the eggs +made them very difficult to find. He says that “when a nest of this +plover is approached the female invariably gets off it at a quick pace, +between a run and a walk, which it continues at short intervals until +the intruder be attracted to a distance therefrom, when it flies away. +The male generally joins its mate in this.” On a few occasions, when +surprised, the bird fluttered away for a short distance, but soon began +to run as usual. Often the bird left the nest when the men were 100 +yards away from it. Once when they had hunted in vain for an hour +and a half, they retired and watched. “After a few minutes she +came on at a cautious run, stopping frequently and making occasional +excursions in different directions,” and finally settled on the eggs. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_180">[Pg 180]</span>They found that several of the party had repeatedly passed quite close +to, and one had nearly trodden on the eggs. Watching the bird +return to the nest, which she generally does within a few minutes, +seems to be the best way of finding a nest.</p> + +<p>Of the nests found near Point Barrow, Mr. Murdoch (1885) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The nest is exceedingly hard to find, although it is not concealed at all, but +is simply a depression in the bare black clayey tundra lined with a little dry +moss. The only vegetation on this part of the tundra is white and grayish +moss, which harmonizes so extraordinarily with the peculiar blotching of the +eggs that it is almost impossible to see them unless one knows exactly where +to look. A favorite nesting site is on the high banks of the gullies or small +streams. No nests were ever found in the grass or in swampy ground.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>W. Sprague Brooks (1915) found only one nest near Demarcation +Point, Alaska, of which he says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I found this nest on June 25 with three eggs about one-quarter incubated. +The male was on the nest. It took several days to find the nest, for the bird +would leave when I was a long way off and begin running about and feeding +as though it had nothing else to do. By placing a lump of tundra each day +where I first saw the bird I eventually found her nest, a mere depression in +some greenish moss which, with scattered bits of brown dead vegetation, +harmonized extraordinarily with the eggs.</p> + +<p>When the bird saw that its nest was finally discovered it showed great +distress and ran toward me until about 20 paces distant, where it stood tottering +as if about to fall, with one wing raised over its back. In a short time +the bird, with tail down and a wing dragging, would walk slowly from me. +As I never followed, the bird would return and totter a while, repeating the +same performance several times until secured for the proper identification of +the eggs.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The golden plover’s normal set is of four eggs, but MacFarlane +collected many sets of three and one of five. These are +quite uniformly ovate pyriform in shape and have only a slight +gloss. The ground colors vary from “cinnamon buff” or “light +pinkish cinnamon” to “light buff,” “cartridge buff,” or “cream +color,” hence more buffy or less olivaceous or grayish than in eggs +of the black-bellied plover. They are boldly and profusely marked, +more or less irregularly, with large and small spots and irregular +blotches of very dark browns or black, “Vandyke brown,” “clove +brown,” and brownish black. Sometimes there are a few underlying +small spots of “drab gray.” The measurements of 143 eggs +in the United States National Museum average 47.5 by 32.5 millimeters; +the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>56</b> by 31, 50 by +<b>34.5</b>, <b>42</b> by 34, and 46 by <b>30</b> millimeters. Both sexes incubate. The +period of incubation for the European species is said to be 27 days.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—In the downy young golden plover the forehead, +crown, back, wings, rump, and thighs are mottled with bright “wax +yellow” and black, the yellow being mainly at the tips of the down. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_181">[Pg 181]</span>A broad patch under the eye, extending back to the ears, and the +chin, are white; a spot in front of the eye and an indistinct band +above it, the hind neck and the throat are yellowish white, the hind +neck being mottled with black; a broad band from the lores to the +nape is pale yellow, mottled with black. The remaining under parts +are grayish white.</p> + +<p>In fresh juvenal plumage, on the breeding grounds, the crown and +all the upper parts are brownish black, the feathers tipped or heavily +notched with bright yellow, “light cadmium” to “buff-yellow,” +brightest on the rump; the wing coverts are pale sepia, notched +paler yellow or white; the breast is pale drab, barred, spotted or +notched with pale dusky and dull yellow, “mustard yellow” to +“Naples yellow”; the belly is white, partially barred with pale +dusky; and the tail feathers are sepia, indistinctly barred with +darker sepia and tipped with dull yellow. By the time that young +birds reach us on migration in September, the bright yellows of the +upper parts have faded considerably, and the duller yellow on the +breast has disappeared entirely. This plumage is not molted until +after the birds leave us; late in the fall, November or later, a partial +molt of the body plumage produces the first winter plumage, which +can be distinguished from the adult only by the juvenal tail and +some retained scapulars and tertials. What happens the next spring +we have not the material to show. Most of the birds that we see here +in the spring are in fully adult nuptial plumage, but I have seen quite +a number of birds, some taken on their breeding grounds, that showed, +more or less, old, worn, winter plumage; these may be young birds +in their first nuptial plumage.</p> + +<p>The postnuptial molt of adults begins with the body molt in +August, the new pale drab and whitish feathers of the winter plumage +appearing first in the black under parts; this molt continues +through September while the birds are migrating. But the primaries +are not molted until winter, November to February. In winter the +plumage of the under parts is very pale drab, shading off to almost +pure white on the chin and belly; the adult tail is irregularly barred +with dusky and grayish or yellowish white; the feathers of the +mantle are brownish black, narrowly edged with yellow, not notched +or spotted as in spring. The prenuptial molt of the body plumage +begins in March and lasts until May in some individuals; many old +winter feathers are often found in breeding birds, especially in the +wing coverts, scapulars, tertials and back. The beautiful nuptial +plumage is too well known to need description here.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The favorite feeding grounds of the golden plover are +rolling pasture lands where the grass is short or scanty, prairies, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_182">[Pg 182]</span>plains, plowed lands and occasionally open sand or mud flats. Its +food consists almost entirely of insects, chiefly Orthoptera which +abound in the pasture lands. It is said to feed mainly on grasshoppers, +but George H. Mackay (1891), who is very familiar with it, +says that he has never seen it eat any, though he has watched it +through a strong glass near at hand. He says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I have also examined the stomachs of a good many which I have shot on +Nantucket, and have never found any grasshoppers in them, nor in fact anything +but crickets (which seem their principal food there), grass seeds, a little +vegetable matter, like seaweed, coarse sand, and small stones. I have also +frequently shot them with the vent stained purple, probably from the berries +of the <i>Empetrum nigrum</i>.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>They must find abundant food in the north, for they are always +very fat when they arrive here. The large numbers of grasshoppers, +locusts, crickets, and other insects that they destroy make them very +beneficial birds to the farmers of the west, where they also do much +good by eating the grubs, cutworms, and wireworms on freshly +plowed lands, their favorite resorts in spring. On the shores and +open flats they find some small mollusks and crustaceans. The crops +of two which Lucien M. Turner collected in northern Ungava were +filled with ripening berries of <i>Empetrum nigrum</i> and remains of +spiders. Hantzsch found them eating beetles and caterpillars on +Baffin Island.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The flight of the golden plover is exceedingly swift, +strong and protracted, as it must be to make such wonderful migrations. +Over the prairies the flocks sweep along in compact and ever +changing formations, skimming close to the ground at times and +then rising high in the air, frequently whistling as they go. William +Brewster (1925) has described their flight, as seen at Umbagog Lake, +Maine, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They habitually flew faster than any of the other waders and perhaps more +swiftly than any of the ducks except the hooded merganser. Their long, +pointed wings, lifting high and cutting deep at each stroke, beat rapidly and +ceaselessly, yet so easily and smoothly as to indicate comparatively slight +muscular effort. If they happened to pass near at hand or overhead their +flight was likely to impress one as having not only exceeding speed but irresistible +momentum, also as of solid projectiles, hurtling through the air. Seen +at a distance they appear to be moving more slowly and looked not unlike +passenger pigeons.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>When preparing to alight the flocks often perform extensive evolutions, +circling and turning, as they sweep about over the ground, +as if selecting a satisfactory landing place. When a suitable spot is +chosen, they all alight in a compact bunch, raising their wings high +above their backs before folding them, and soon scatter over the +ground to feed. When on the ground they are very active, running +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_183">[Pg 183]</span>rapidly and gracefully, stopping suddenly to look around, with +head held high, and then striking quickly at some morsel of food. +Mr. Mackay (1891) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When scattered over considerable ground, as is usual after they have been +any length of time on their feeding ground, every bird apparently on its own +hook, if alarmed, a note is sounded; they then rise so as to meet as soon as +possible at a common center, which gained, away they go in a compact body. +During the middle of the day they are fond of seeking the margins of ponds, +where they sit quietly for a long time, if undisturbed. When disturbed they +are almost certain to return, in a short time, to the same spot from which +they have been started, that is, if they have been resting or feeding there any +length of time. When suspicious, it is very difficult to approach, decoy, or call +them; if not harassed, they are as a rule quite tame and gentle, and can be +easily driven up to with horse and wagon.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—John T. Nichols says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The flight note of the golden plover in migration is a far-reaching <i>que-e-e-a</i>, +with a quaver in the middle and falling at the end. Though with a thrilling +plover quality it at the same time has an affinity to the killdeer’s cry, being +less mellow and whistled than the note of the blackbelly, which it also suggests, +reversed.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Mackay (1891) says that when these birds are approaching +decoys every bird seems to be whistling “a note like <i>coodle, coodle, +coodle</i>.” Mr. Forbush (1912) calls its note “a plaintive <i>too-lee-e</i>,” +or “a bright whistle, <i>queep-quee-lee-leep</i>.” Others have given +different renderings of some of the above notes.</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The bird with which the golden plover is most +likely to be confused is the black-bellied plover, but the golden is a +smaller, more slender, bird, with a generally darker appearance. +When seen in flight the tone of the tail is very dark and the axillars, +under the wings, are grey, whereas in the black-bellied the tail is +decidedly whitish and the axillars are very conspicuously black in +all plumages; furthermore the black-bellied has a conspicuous light +wing bar, which is lacking in the golden. The notes of the two are +quite different. When in hand the golden is seen to have no hind +toe. Mr. Nichols suggests that the golden has a swifter, more buoyant +flight, suggestive of the killdeer.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—Mr. Murdoch (1885) refers to the beginning of the migration +as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The nesting season continues till the first or middle of July, about which +time the adults begin to collect in flocks, feeding together around the ponds +on the higher tundra, associated sometimes with a few knots or a struggling curlew. +The old birds leave for the south about the end of July, and no more +plovers are to be seen until about the middle of August, when the young, who +heretofore have been keeping out of sight, scattered over the tundra, gather +into flocks, and for several days are quite plenty on the dryer hills and banks, +after which they depart. Stragglers may be seen up to the end of August.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_184">[Pg 184]</span></p> + +<p>The main trend of the fall migration is southeastwards, mainly +west and south of Hudson Bay, but perhaps across it also, to the +Atlantic coast, mostly north of New England. In favorable weather +the flight is over the ocean from Nova Scotia to South America over, +or to the eastward of, Bermuda, and the Lesser Antilles. Mr. Clark +(1905) figures out that this is the course they would take, if they +flew with a beam wind, across the prevailing winds. Of their course +after landing in British Guiana, he says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>From this point their course is not accurately known; but if we apply this +theory, they would follow down the northeastern tributaries of the Amazons +until they came within the influence of the southeast trades, which would carry +them southwest, over central Amazonia toward Peru and Bolivia. Somewhat +northwest of the Matto Grosso region, the birds would come under the influence +of the easterly winds on the southern border of the trades, which would turn +them south, and gradually (as they became more northeasterly) southeast, +which would bring the plover into the prairie region of the Argentine. Here +the prevailing westerlies of the pampas region would be felt, and the birds +would, under their influence, continue down the eastern part of Patagonia +toward Tierra del Fuego.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>To add strength to his theory he says that there are specimens +in the British Museum from Mount Roraima and the Maroni River, +Surinam, and from Peru taken in September and October.</p> + +<p>Some birds on the fall migration wander as far north and east as +Baffin Island and northeastern Labrador. Lucien M. Turner refers +in his notes to several adults which he saw and two which he collected, +near the mouth of the Koksoak River, between July 24 and +August 19, 1882; and I have a specimen in my collection taken near +Hopedale, Labrador, a young bird. Hantzsch found this plover +breeding on Baffin Island.</p> + +<p>Edwin Beaupre (1917) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In September, 1906, a great flight of plover passed over the city of Kingston, +which is located on the extreme eastern end of Lake Ontario. The flight was +first noticed about 8 o’clock in the evening, and to one familiar with the soft, +sweet piping of the golden plover, there was no difficulty whatever in recognizing +the bird. A record of the flight showed that eight flocks passed over the city, +flying very low, at intervals of about 10 minutes. Toward midnight it was +impossible to enumerate the flocks, the flight being continuous. This must +have been the main migration for that year, and it continued until 4 o’clock +in the morning, covering eight hours. Allowing a speed of 25 miles an hour—a +conservative estimate—the distance between the leading flocks and the rear +guard must have been approximately 200 miles. What a sublime spectacle +this would have been had one the privilege of seeing it in the open light of day! +The vanguard of this great aerial aggregation must have reached almost to +the Atlantic seaboard, while the rear flocks were trailing their wonderful +way over the eastern waters of Lake Ontario. They no doubt began their +ocean journey some miles south of the coast of Nova Scotia, but not far enough +to seriously affect their regular route to Argentina, in which country they +escape the hardship of a Canadian winter.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_185">[Pg 185]</span></p> + +<p>The above quotation and the fact that William Brewster (1925) +recorded the golden plover as visiting the Umbagog Lake region in +Maine “regularly and rather plentifully not so many years ago,” +suggests the idea that some of the birds we used to see in New England +came by an overland route. However, our big flights were +probably birds that came in from the sea under stress of bad weather, +either before or during easterly storms accompanied by heavy rains +or thick fog. According to Mr. Mackay’s (1891) records, covering a +period of 32 years from 1858 to 1890, the last week in August seems +to be the best time to look for a flight, though he says “it is unusual +to see any but scattering birds before the 10th of September.” My +earliest record for adult birds is August 9; practically all the birds +which come in August are adults. The young birds come in September; +my latest date is October 7. The appearance of either adults +or young on our coast has always been very uncertain and irregular, +dependent on the necessary weather conditions coming at the proper +time.</p> + +<p>Mr. Mackay (1891) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>While I have continually shot the young birds on Nantucket, and in other +parts of Massachusetts, their arrival is a much more uncertain event than that +of the older birds, there being some years when I have seen none, and others +only a few. I have never known a year when they were anything like as numerous +as I have seen the older birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>During some years large flocks of golden plover pass over the +Bermudas in September and October, according to Capt. Savile G. +Reid (1884), “but, unless in stormy weather, they do not alight in +any great numbers. Numbers appeared in September, 1874, frequenting +the grassy slopes of the north shore—their favorite haunt—and +even the parade grounds, during the continuance of a three day’s +revolving gale.”</p> + +<p>Col. H. W. Feilden (1889) writing of conditions in Barbados, the +easternmost of the West Indies, says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Stragglers arrive as early as July and the beginning of August, but the main +flights come with the first heavy weather after the 27th of August, and long +experience and observation proves that this date is kept year after year with +wonderful accuracy. The course of all the migratory Charadriidae across +Barbados in the autumn is from the northwest to southeast, and if the wind +blows from southeast the birds are brought down to the island, for it appears +to be a tolerably well established observation that birds prefer migrating with +a “beam” wind. A shift of wind from the northeast, with squally weather to +the southeast, is ardently longed for by the Barbados sportsmen toward the +end of August, as this forces the migratory hosts to alight instead of passing +over at a great height, as they are seen to do when the wind is from the northeast. +The first arrivals of this species are invariably black-breasted birds, showing +that the old birds precede the young, and the first comers are nearly all +males. The young birds without black on the breast appear about the 12th of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_186">[Pg 186]</span>September, and continue to pass till the end of October, sometimes stragglers +are as late as November. Even in the most favorable seasons, only a fraction +of the immense flights that pass over the island ever alight.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Much has been written about the Atlantic flight of the golden +plover and remarkably little has been said about the southward +flight in the interior, but such a flight occurs regularly, though in +much smaller numbers. Professor Rowan (1926) says that in +Alberta:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>We have notes of hundreds going south in a single day in mid September, +when the main movements occur annually. An interesting feature of the fall +migration of golden plover is that it consists entirely of young birds. The +earliest record we have is August 18 and the next August 24. These are rather +early, September being the chief month of arrival. The fall movements are +protracted, and we may have small flocks with us till toward the end of October. +Another feature of the autumn migration is a change of habit. The birds, while +often noted on pasture (particularly if in large flocks) more usually frequent +the muds and behave like the majority of other waders. They associate freely +and habitually with other species. They behave like the strays of the spring. +Being birds of the year there is no doubt in their case that they are sexually +undeveloped.</p> + +<p>We have a single record of an adult bird in the fall collected by Harrold on +August 22. It was noted the previous day, but not secured, and proved to be a +female well advanced in its moult. There is one other reliable autumn record +for an adult golden plover from the Province, seen at Sullivan Lake in July +by Mr. T. E. Randall. Until we have spent the whole of July at our lake or +some other suitable observation station, it will be impossible to say that adults +never—except accidentally as strays—come south through the Province, but all +evidence available indicates that they do not do so.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>I can not wholly agree with Professor Rowan’s evident belief that +all the birds that migrate through the interior are young birds and +that very few young birds take the Atlantic route. However, the +dates given by numerous observers in the Mississippi Valley and in +Texas would seem to indicate that they were nearly all referable to +young birds, as they are generally late dates. The main migration +route for both adults and young is evidently the Atlantic route; the +species is comparatively rare in the interior, south of Canada. It is +still rarer on its southward migration along the Pacific coast; the +dates are mostly late, probably for young birds; D. E. Brown has +sent me two records from Washington. October 7, 1917, Gray’s +Harbor County, and November 14, 1915, Clallam County. Apparently +most of the adults take the Atlantic route; the young birds are +spread out over the whole country, but are much more inclined to +the eastern route.</p> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—The golden plover has been a famous game bird. It was +a most desirable table bird, as it was usually very fat and its flesh +had a delicious flavor on account of its clean, upland feeding habits. +The uncertainty of its appearance and its enormous numbers at +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_187">[Pg 187]</span>favorable times made its pursuit most interesting. During the years +of its abundance it was slaughtered in almost incredible numbers. +Audubon (1840) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>While at New Orleans, on the 16th of March, 1821, I was invited by some +French gunners to accompany them to the neighborhood of Lake St. John to +witness the passage of thousands of these birds, which were coming from the +northeast and continuing their course. At the first appearance of the birds +early in the morning, the gunners had assembled in parties of from 20 to 50 at +different places, where they knew from experience that the plovers would pass. +There stationed, at nearly equal distances from each other, they were sitting +on the ground. When a flock approached, every individual whistled in imitation +of the plover’s call note, on which the birds descended, wheeled, and, +passing within 40 or 50 yards, ran the gauntlet, as it were. Every gun went +off in succession, and with such effect that I several times saw a flock of a +hundred or more reduced to a miserable remnant of five or six individuals. +The game was brought up after each volley by the dogs, while their masters +were charging their pieces anew. This sport was continued all day, and at +sunset, when I left one of these lines of gunners, they seemed as intent on +killing more as they were when I arrived. A man near the place where I was +seated had killed 63 dozens. I calculated the number in the field at 200, and +supposing each to have shot 20 dozen, 48,000 golden plovers would have fallen +that day.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>John C. Cahoon (1888) describes a method of shooting golden +plover employed by old gunners on Cape Cod, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Several weeks before the time for the flights to occur, they go to an old field +or pasture that they know the birds usually come into and burn off the old +grass and bushes for quite a space. Then a hole is dug large enough for one +or two persons to sit in comfortably, with only the top of their heads above +the surface. In a few weeks the grass springs up and the green patch is easily +distinguished from its duller surroundings by the plover flying about, and they +are sure to come to this place. The gunner, with his decoys out, sits in his pit +with only the top of his head out, which is covered with a green cap. A flock, +before alighting to the decoys, will usually circle about several times, often +flying directly over the gunner’s head only a few yards away. An experienced +gunner will not shoot when they are so near and scattered, as he could kill +but one or two, but will wait for them to bunch at the right distance, which +they are sure to do while turning, and seize that opportunity to fire, killing +many at one shot.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Mackay (1891) says: “They are extremely gregarious, and I +have had the same flock return to my decoys as many as four times +after some of their number had been shot each time.” This remark +probably refers to adult birds, which come readily to decoys or in +response to skillful whistling; I have seen a single bird whistled up +from so far away that it was hardly visible. Professor Rowan (1926) +says that he has “found it practically impossible to whistle them +within gun range.” He probably refers to young birds, of which +Mr. Mackay (1891) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>These young birds invariably appear wild and wary, much more so than the +old ones. They are also very erratic in their movements and flight when with +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_188">[Pg 188]</span>us. They usually will not pay so much attention to the decoys or call whistle as +do the old birds; and I have seen them, when very shy and after being disturbed, +mount up into the air and nearly turn over on their backs while +flying with great velocity. It is a noteworthy fact that when a flock of these +young birds is approaching no dependence can be placed on their movements. +They may sometimes sweep down within a few yards of the sportsman, passing +with great rapidity over his head, all scattered; or down close to the stand +and then up into the air; or they may turn suddenly. My experience has +taught me not to wait, as is my custom with the older birds, to get them +together before shooting, but fire at them whenever and wherever I can if +they are within range. The older birds rarely indulge in any similar antics.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>During the days of spring shooting in the west golden plover +were often shot, without decoys, by making a blind or selecting some +natural hiding place within their regular fly ways, which were generally +quite well established and known. It was always difficult to +stalk them on foot, but where there were no fences they could be +stalked successfully by a hunter on horseback or in a wagon.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—The golden plover arrive in their winter home early in +September, or rarely late in August, where they remain until February +or March. W. H. Hudson (1920) writing of the days when +these birds were plentiful, says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The American golden plover is abundant and well known to every one by +its native name, <i>Chorlo</i>, throughout southern Argentina. Its wild, clear notes +are first heard about the last week in August, and among the first comers +many individuals are seen still wearing the nuptial dress. After their long +journey from the Arctic regions they are lean and not worth shooting; two +months later they become excessively fat, and are then much appreciated by +gourmets. But although so regular in their arrival, they do not regularly +visit the same localities every season; the bird may be abundant in a place +one year and scarce or absent altogether the next. During the spring, from +September to December, they prefer open plains with short grass and in the +neighborhood of wet or marshy ground; at the end of December, when the +giant thistle (<i>Carduus mariana</i>), which often covers large areas of country, +has been burnt up by the sun and blown to the ground, they scatter about +a great deal in flocks of from one to four or five hundred. At noon, however, +they all resort to a lagoon or marshy place containing water, congregating +day after day in such numbers that they blacken the ground over an area +of several acres in extent, and at a distance of a quarter of a mile the din of +their united voices resembles the roar of a cataract. As population increases +on the pampas these stupendous gatherings are becoming more and more rare. +Twenty-five years ago it was an exceptional thing for a man to possess a +gun, or to use one when he had it; and if Chorlos were wanted a gaucho boy +with a string a yard long with a ball of lead attached to each end could knock +down as many as he liked. I have killed them in this way myself, also with +the bola perdida—a ball at the end of a long string thrown at random into +a cloud of birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Doctor Wetmore (1926) saw golden plover on migration in Paraguay +during September; they “came to the open shores of lagoons +with other sandpipers, but were more often seen in flocks of 30 or +40 scattered over open savannas where the grass was not too long.” +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_189">[Pg 189]</span>He saw them also in Argentina during November and December, +where they seemed “to be restricted during the resting period to +the better watered grass-grown eastern pampa.”</p> + +<p>Again (1927) he says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The golden plover in the south has been most common on open plains, but +ranges to some extent on the mud flats of the coast. It is in this last area +that the species may be expected to survive as the pampas become more +closely occupied by man. These birds are hunted extensively and so many +have been killed both in the north and south that their numbers have +been greatly reduced. Though recorded in its nesting range as only fairly +common at best, the region where the golden plover is found at this season is +extensive, so that the number of birds in existence is still considerable. +Careful watch should be kept on its abundance.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North and South America, accidental in Europe.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The breeding range of the American golden +plover has not been definitely separated from that of its western +relative (<i>Pluvialis d. fulva</i>). It has, however, been found that in +Alaska <i>fulva</i> is more nearly confined to the northwestern coastal +regions, while <i>dominica</i> is in the interior and on the northern coast.</p> + +<p>The breeding range may be defined as extending north to Alaska +(Point Barrow, Collinson Point, and Demarcation Point); Baffin +Island (Kangianga, Tikerakdjuak, and Kangidli); and Franklin +(Walker Bay, Bay of Mercy, Winter Harbor, Wellington Channel, +and probably Igloolik). East to Baffin Island; Franklin (probably +Igloolik and Winter Island); and northeastern Keewatin (Whale +Point). South to Keewatin (Whale Point); Mackenzie (Casba +River, Lac de Gras, Bernard Harbor, Rendezvous Lake, Fort Anderson, +and Fort McPherson); and Alaska (Gens de Large Mountains, +Beaver Mountains, and probably Nushagak). West to Alaska +(probably Nushagak and Point Barrow).</p> + +<p>It also has been detected in summer in Greenland (Jacobshavn +and Godthaab), but there is no evidence of breeding in that region.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range of the American golden plover +extends north to rarely Chile (Arica); and rarely Brazil (Villa +Maria, Matto Grosso, and Rio de Janeiro). East to rarely Brazil +(Rio de Janeiro and Santa Catarina); Uruguay (Montevideo); +and Argentina (La Plata, Cape San Antonio, and Bahia Blanca). +South to Argentina (Bahia Blanca, Sierra de la Ventana, Carhue, +and Mendoza). West to western Argentina (Mendoza); and rarely +Chile (Arica). On rare occasions individuals may pass the winter +season at more northern points as Nauta, Peru (Sharpe), and Old +Harbor, Costa Rica (Carriker). Winter occurrences at other northern +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_190">[Pg 190]</span>localities probably refer to crippled birds or erroneous identifications.</p> + +<p><i>Migration.</i>—The main migration route of the American golden +plover is of an elliptical nature. In late summer, after the breeding +season, the birds move southeast across northern Canada to the +coasts of Labrador and Nova Scotia, from which points they fly, +apparently without stopping, to the northeast coast of South +America, passing thence through the interior to the pampas region +of Argentina. The northward flight in spring is made farther west, +through Central America, up the Mississippi Valley to the prairie +Provinces of Canada.</p> + +<p>Individuals and small flocks are, of course, noted more or less +regularly in both spring and fall, both on the Atlantic coast and in +the interior, but the main route should be borne in mind when considering +the following dates of arrival and departure.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival in the spring are: +Porto Rico, Mameyes, February 16; Bermuda, March 9, 1852 (only +spring record); New York, Long Island City, April 17, and Fair +Haven Light, May 3; Massachusetts, Revere, March 6, and Somerville, +March 20; Nova Scotia, Pictou, May 17; Quebec, Godbout, +May 31; Franklin, Igloolik, June 14; Louisiana, New Orleans, March +16, Avery Island, March 28; and West Baton Rouge, April 2; Arkansas, +Fayetteville, March 20; Missouri, St. Louis, March 23, +Kansas City, April 11, and Kings Lake, April 12; Illinois, Mount +Carmel, March 12, Lebanon, March 17, and Chicago, March 22; +Indiana, Terre Haute, March 22, Greencastle, March 28, and Muncie, +March 30; Ohio, Sandusky, March 26, West Liberty, April 2, and +Columbus, April 4; Michigan, Pittsfield, April 20; Iowa, Scranton, +March 25, Newton, March 27, and Keokuk, April 14; Wisconsin, +Clinton, April 9, and Racine, April 14; Minnesota, Heron Lake, +April 12, Waseca, April 21, and Wilder, April 24; Texas, Gainesville, +March 7, Mont Belvieu, March 8, Boerne, March 9, and +Indianola, March 15; Oklahoma, Caddo, March 11; Kansas, Richmond, +March 22, Lawrence, March 29, Manhattan, April 4, and +Emporia, April 18; Nebraska, Kearney, April 8; South Dakota, +Fort Sisseton, April 13, Huron, April 25, and White, April 26; +North Dakota, Larimore, May 2, and Grafton, May 3; Manitoba, +Aweme, April 23, Treesbank, May 1, Portage la Prairie, May 8, +and Margaret, May 8; Saskatchewan, Osler, May 8, and Indian +Head, May 9; Mackenzie, Fort Simpson, May 15, and Fort Resolution, +May 23; Alberta, Alliance, May 5, Mundare, May 12, Camrose, +May 7, and Red Deer, May 9; and Alaska, Beaver Mountains, +April 29, Sitka, May 5, Flat, May 11, Fort Reliance, May 13, Fairbanks, +May 17, and Point Barrow, May 21.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_191">[Pg 191]</span></p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Argentina, Rio Negro, February +18, Mendoza, March 23, and Tucuman, April 5; Guatemala, +Duenas, April 12; Louisiana, Avery Island, May 3, and Breton +Island, May 13; Kentucky, Crab Orchard, May 10; Missouri, Hunnewell, +May 18, and Boonville, May 31; Illinois, Addison, May 10, +Rantoul, May 12, and Chicago, May 17; Indiana, Lebanon, May 23; +and Michigan City, June 2; Ohio, Sandusky, May 19, Bay Point, May +23, and Wauseon, May 27; Iowa, Gilbert Station, May 16, Cedar +Rapids, May 17, and Clear Lake, May 20; Wisconsin, Racine, May +4, and Madison, May 30; Minnesota, Hallock, May 20, Wilder, May +22, and Twin Valley, May 30; Texas, Corpus Christi, April 28, +Gainesville, May 12, and Point Isabel, May 15; Kansas, Manhattan, +May 4, Paola, May 7, and Lawrence, May 8; Nebraska, Valentine, +May 25; South Dakota, Sioux Falls, May 23, White, May 25, and +Harrison, May 27; North Dakota, Devils Lake, May 23, Jerusalem, +June 1, and Larimore, June 7; Manitoba, Aweme, May 29, Margaret, +June 3, and Shoal Lake, June 6; Saskatchewan, Indian Head, May +22, Winston, May 29, and Churchill River, June 2; Colorado, Denver, +May 17; Alberta, Mundare, May 26, Sedgewick, May 30, and Fort +Chipewyan, June 1; and British Columbia, between Shusicap Falls +and Mabel Lake, May 29 (only spring record).</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival in the fall are: British +Columbia, Graham Island, July 27, Sumas Lake, August 19, and +Chilliwack, August 26; Keewatin, Cape Eskimo, August 4; Manitoba, +Aweme, August 6, Shoal Lake, August 21, and Margaret, August +27; North Dakota, Fort Berthold, September 16; South Dakota, White, +September 12, great bend of the Missouri River, September 18, and +Harrison, September 20; Nebraska, Nebraska City, August 3, and +Ames, August 22; Minnesota, St. Vincent, August 29, and Hibbing, +September 13; Ontario, Toronto, August 25, and Brighton, August 28; +Michigan, Houghton, September 5, Charity Island, September 9, and +Detroit, September 10; Ohio, Columbus, August 23, New Bremen, September +1, Youngstown, September 2, and Cleveland, September 8; +Indiana, Waterloo, August 25, and Lebanon, September 29; Illinois, +Rantoul, August 6, Glen Ellyn, September 10, and Chicago, September +13; Louisiana, mouth of Mermentau River, August 11; Mississippi, +Bay St. Louis, September 26; Newfoundland, St. George Bay, +August 17; Quebec, Gaspe Peninsula, August 29, and Montreal, +August 31; Prince Edward Island, Malpeque, August 23; New Brunswick, +Scotch Lake, August 21; Nova Scotia, Sable Island, August +20; Maine, Portland, August 12; Massachusetts, Ipswich, July 18, +Plymouth, August 7, Nantucket, August 12, Cape Cod, August 15, +and Monomoy Island, August 18; Rhode Island, Newport, August 12, +and Kingston, August 19; Connecticut, Bridgeport, August 14, and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_192">[Pg 192]</span>Guilford, August 27; Rhode Island, Point Judith, August 21; New +York, Montauk Light Station, August 9, Long Island City, August +12, Syracuse, August 22, and Shinnecock Bay, August 29; New +Jersey, Great Bay, July 19; Cuba, Guantanamo, September 30; Lesser +Antilles, Barbados, July 24, Grenada, August 24, St. Croix, August +31, and Sombrero, September 2; British Guiana, Auni, August 30; +and Paraguay, Puerto Pinasco, September 6. Specimens also have +been detected at Bermuda as early as July 25 (Hamilton).</p> + +<p>Late dates of departure in the autumn are: Alaska, Nome, September +14, Baranof Island, September 18, Kenai River, October 7, +and St. George Island, October 18 (there is a strong possibility that +all of these Alaskan records refer to the Pacific form, <i>Pluvialis d. +fulva</i>); British Columbia, East Kootenay, October 13, Chilliwack, +October 14, and Comox, November 4; Alberta, Edmonton, September +23, delta of the Athabaska River, October 10, and Beaverhill Lake, +October 22; Montana, Terry, September 23, and St. Marys Lake, +October 1; Wyoming, Rock Creek, October 25; Colorado, Newcastle, +October 5; Mackenzie, Manito Islands, September 14, Lower Slave +River, September 29, and Fort Liard, October 5; Saskatchewan, +Indian Head, October 2, and Quill Lake, October 11; Manitoba, +Aweme, October 16; South Dakota, Fort Pierre, October 21, and +Fort Sisseton, October 26; Nebraska, Lincoln, November 14; Kansas, +Emporia, October 22, and Lawrence, October 23; Minnesota, Madison, +October 22, St. Vincent, October 26, and Lanesboro, November +2; Iowa, Bronson, November 9, and Keokuk, November 9; Ontario, +Toronto, October 23, Brighton, November 3, and Ottawa, November +4; Michigan, Gibraltar, October 12, Mainstee, October 17, and +Detroit, November 4; Ohio, New Bremen, October 23, Painesville, +October 31, and Youngstown, November 11; Indiana, English Lake, +November 15; Illinois, Morgan Park, October 28, Hinsdale, November +4, and Urbana, November 8; Arkansas, Crocketts Bluff, October +22; Greenland, August 7; Franklin, Baffin Bay, September 3; +Quebec, Koksoak River, September 19, Kamouraska, October 19, +Montreal, November 8, and Quebec City, November 10; Nova Scotia, +Sable Island, October 22, and St. Marys Bay, October 23; Maine, +Lewiston, October 16, and Portland, November 15; Vermont, Wells +River, October 14; Massachusetts, Monomoy Island, October 13, +Plymouth, October 24, and Provincetown, November 19; Rhode +Island, South Auburn, October 12, and Newport, October 24; Connecticut, +West Haven, October 25, and Hartford, October 24; New +York, Ithaca, October 29, Rockaway, October 30, Orient Point, +November 5, and Auburn, November 8; Bahamas, Cay Lobos, October +25; Porto Rico, Anegada Lagoon, November 4; West Indies, +Barbados, December 7; and Costa Rica, San Jose, December 15.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_193">[Pg 193]</span></p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—South of New Jersey on the Atlantic coast, this +species has been recorded on a few occasions, among which are: +District of Columbia, Washington, one about 1860; Virginia, Smiths +Island, September 28, 1897, and Wallops Island, several occurrences +between August 12 and October 3 (Warren); North Carolina, several +records in spring between April 15 (Waterlily), and May 10 (Currituck), +and in fall between August 29 (Martins Point), and September +29 (Churchs Island); South Carolina, Chester County, September +19, 1877, Christ Church Parish, November 27, 1912, and Charleston, +November 4, 1911, and December, 1880; and Florida, Miakka, November +19, 1901, and December, 1900.</p> + +<p>On the Pacific coast of the United States it is only casual: Washington, +several records in the fall between September 9 (Port Townsend), +and November 14 (Dungeness); Oregon, Netarts Bay, September +7, 1912; and California, Playa del Rey Lagoon, October 4, +1923, Santa Cruz, October 22, 1888, and possible at Coronado, January +12–20, 1908 (Torrey). Suckley reported it from the vicinity +of San Francisco, and Kobbe from Menlo Park and Vallejo, but +both of these records are indefinite.</p> + +<p>The American golden plover has been obtained a few times in +Great Britain, Essex, August, 1896, Perthshire, August, 1883, +Leadenhall Market, fall of 1882, and Mayo County, September, +1894; while a single specimen was taken on Heligoland, December +20, 1847.</p> + +<p><i>Egg Dates.</i>—Arctic coasts of Alaska and Canada: 176 records, +June 1 to July 15; 88 records, June 25 to July 2.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Pac_gold"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">PLUVIALIS DOMINICA FULVA</span> <span class="smaller">(Gmelin)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">PACIFIC GOLDEN PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The Pacific golden plover is a smaller and more brightly colored +subspecies of the American golden plover. It breeds on the Arctic +coast of Siberia from the Yenesei River to Bering Strait and on the +Bering Sea coast of Alaska. On the coast of Alaska north of Bering +Strait it intergrades with the American form, and there is some evidence +that it intergrades or hybridizes with the European golden +plover at the western end of its range. It is known as the Asiatic or +eastern golden plover by European writers. It winters from India +and China to Australia, New Zealand, the Hawaiian Islands, and +many other islands in the southern Pacific Ocean.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—This plover makes even more wonderful migratory flights +than its American relative, for between its winter and its summer +homes it travels twice each year over thousands of miles of trackless +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_194">[Pg 194]</span>ocean; many individuals may become lost or perish, but the majority +of them seem to find their way by some marvelous sense of direction. +The reader is referred to an excellent paper on the migration of this +plover to and from the Hawaiian Islands by Dr. Henry W. Henshaw +(1910). Of the spring migration he writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>During the last two months of their stay in the Islands both the migrating +plover and turnstones get very fat, and it is probable that individuals that are +not in good condition do not attempt the flight, or if they do do not survive the +attempt. Toward April most plover seem to be in full breeding plumage, and I +feel sure that none of the birds assuming the breeding dress remain behind +unless sick or wounded. There is, however, a small contingent, both of plover +and turnstones, that summer in the islands, and these appear to consist wholly +of immature individuals, which, as a rule, are thin and not in good trim.</p> + +<p>When the time to migrate comes, small parties, from a dozen or even less to +flocks of 200 or more, strike boldly out to the northward, apparently without +hesitancy or doubt of the result. Mr. Haswell, of Papaikou, which is on the +coast about 15 miles north of Hilo, soon after daybreak during the early days of +April, 1900, saw several flocks rise to a great height and, after widely circling +about a few times as if to orient themselves, finally disappear in a northerly +direction.</p> + +<p>It is probable, however, that day migration is not the rule with plover and +other shore birds. Apparently it is more usual for the flocks to feed by day and +leave just before nightfall, as do many other birds in different parts of the +world. Mr. R. C. L. Perkins states that several times he “witnessed these +departures always late in the afternoon or just before dark.”</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>How fast the birds fly or how long it takes them to make the 2,000 +mile flight across the ocean to the Aleutian Islands, we do not know. +If they fly at the rate of 40 miles an hour without stopping, it would +take over two days. They probably can not sustain such a prolonged +effort without food. Practically all shore birds are known to alight +on and arise from the water at will; so the chances are that they stop +to rest on the way. They probably obtain some food from floating +masses of seaweed, from the refuse left by whales, or from the numerous +forms of minute animal life to be found on the surface. These +birds have frequently been seen migrating at sea hundreds of miles +from land, and one observer has actually seen one resting on the +water. Evidence that they do so is furnished by the fact that native +gunners in Trinidad, according to some notes sent to me by Julian +Lyder, detect the newly arrived birds by a salty taste on the feathers.</p> + +<p>The plover leave the Hawaiian Islands during April and May. +We have no data as to when they reach the Aleutian Islands, but +they arrive in the Commander Islands about the middle of May, and +the first arrivals were noted at Nijni Kolymsk, Siberia, on May 30. +On the Pribilof Islands they have been known to arrive as early as +April 18, but they usually come about the first week in May. A. H. +Twitchell tells me that he has seen them at Bethel, Alaska, as early +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_195">[Pg 195]</span>as May 8, and Herbert W. Brandt says in his notes from Hooper +Bay:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When the first small flocks of this noble Asiatic visitant appeared on Point +Dall on May 16 the receding snow seemed to emphasize its golden splendor. +It never became really common like its larger relative, the black-bellied plover, +but numerous individuals and small bands were observed which, however, +proved to be transients, for they all departed by early June. They usually +associated with the gaudily attired ruddy turnstone and the combined lavish +color effect of these two feathered gems was lovely indeed to behold. The +Eskimos claim that, when seal hunting off Point Dall, they often encountered +birds of the present species flying shoreward, so perhaps many of these long-flighted +migrants moved directly from the western section of the Aleutian +Islands across Bering Sea to their Alaskan summer homes.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Mr. Brandt has sent me the following notes on the +nesting habits of this plover:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The breeding realm of the aristocratic golden plover in the Hooper Bay +region is confined to a narrow belt on the mountain slopes well above brush +line in the Askinuk Range. Here at an altitude of from five to eight hundred +feet dwells a pair nearly every half mile, or about the same relative distance +apart that the black-bellied plover families maintain between themselves on +the tundra below.</p> + +<p>The only nest of the Pacific golden plover to come under my observation +was found on June 27 at an altitude of 600 feet on the Bimute spur of the +Askinuk Range. On this upper mountain slope amid the scattered rocky +outcrops exists a grim Arctic flora of mosses and lichens which in patches is +mottled black and grayish white. On one of these velvet-like spots a little +top moss is removed by the birds so as to make a slight depression in which +the four beautiful eggs are placed. The lining of the nest is simply a few +short unarranged stems of the reindeer moss that no doubt grew on the site. +The nesting cavity is 4 inches in diameter and only half an inch in depth, +thus making it notable as perhaps the most meager of the limicoline abodes +we found. The parti-colored eggs and their environs blend as one in coloration, +so, even in that jaeger-ridden land, they enjoy unusual protective security. +The male bird alone was present during my stay in the vicinity of his abiding +place and failed to exhibit either the extreme timidity or the agitation so +characteristic of the black-bellied plover.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Henry Seebohm (1901) gives the following account of finding a +nest near the banks of the Yenesei River in Siberia:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On the top of the bank I found myself on the real tundra. Not a trace of a +pine tree was visible, and the birches rarely exceeded 12 inches in height. +There was less grass, more moss and lichen, and the ground was covered with +patches of yellow mud or clay, in which were a few small stones, that were +apparently too barren for even moss or lichen to grow upon. The tundra +was hilly, with lakes, swamps, and bogs in the wide valleys and plains. As +soon as I reached the flat bogs I heard the plaintive cry of a plover, and +presently caught sight of two birds. The male was very conspicuous, but all +my attempts to follow the female with my glass, in order to trace her to +the nest, proved ineffectual; she was too nearly the color of the ground, and +the herbage was too high. Feeling convinced that I was within 30 paces of +the nest, I shot the male, and commenced a diligent search. The bird proved +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_196">[Pg 196]</span>to be the Asiatic golden plover, with gray axillaries, and I determined to +devote at least an hour looking for the nest. By a wonderful piece of good +fortune I found it, with four eggs, in less than five minutes. It was merely +a hollow in the ground upon a piece of turfy land, overgrown with moss and +lichen, and was lined with broken stalks of reindeer moss. The eggs more +resembled those of the golden than those of the grey plover, but were smaller +than either.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Miss Maud D. Haviland (1915<i>a</i>) had considerable experience +with this plover on the Yenesei and took some excellent photographs +of it; she writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I first saw a few birds at Dudinka, where they were probably on migration, +and afterwards the species was common all the way down to Golchika. Each +pair occupied perhaps 2 furlongs of tundra. I should think that every acre +of moss and lichen from the Yenesei to the Lena in summer is thus parceled +out. Your progress across the tundra in July is heralded and attended by a +chorus of plaintive cries. Both birds meet you a quarter of a mile from the +nest and never leave you until you are at the boundaries of their own territory, +and they can safely hand you over to their next neighbors for espionage. +Covert, of course, there is none—but it is needless to say more. The suspiciousness +and patience of the golden plover are the same all the world over; +and I will not dwell upon them to those who themselves have no doubt +walked vainly for half a day about the bird’s breeding grounds in this country +and listened to its maddening but at the same time most musical protests.</p> + +<p>The first nest was found on July 4. It was a shallow depression, lined with +dry lichen haulms on a slope of the tundra. The bird, which must, I think, +either have been deaf or else exceedingly stupid, did not move until I was well +over the hill and within 60 yards of her, when she jumped up and feigned a +broken wing.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The eggs are similar to those of the American golden +plover; the ground colors average paler. In three sets they run +from “light buff” to “cream color”; Mr. Brandt’s eggs run from +“ivory yellow” to “vinaceous buff”; and in two eggs figured by +Mr. Poynting (1895) the ground colors are in shades of “olive +buff.” Mr. Brandt says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The eggs of this bird are no doubt subject to much variation for the two +sets are very different. On one the surface markings are distinct and elongated +longitudinally while on the other clutch large blotches almost cover the larger +end. These spots are brownish black to black where the pigment is rich, but +when occasionally it is thin, as on a few outlying edges, it becomes brick red. +Pursuant to the usual rule with many of the boldly marked eggs of the shore +birds the underlying spots are few and ill defined. These are in lavender tones +from pale mouse gray to grayish lavender.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The measurements of 34 eggs average 48 by 33.2 millimeters; the +eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>51.8</b> by 32.5, 48.5 by <b>34.9</b>, +<b>45.2</b> by 32.4, and 46.4 by <b>31.5</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—The incubation period is probably the same as it is +for the European bird, 27 days; both sexes incubate the eggs and +care for the young. Thayer and Bangs (1914) write:</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_197">[Pg 197]</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Mr. Koren watched the habits of the birds closely and found that the +males appear to do all the incubating in the early stages, the female at that +time never being near the nest. Later on, when the eggs are nearly ready +to hatch, she appears again and takes her turn with the male. When the +young are hatched, both parent birds are always with them. At Cape Chelakhskai, +August 27, 1912, large flocks of young birds were seen ready to +migrate.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Miss Haviland (1915<i>a</i>) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>As soon as the young ones were able to run alone, which, roughly speaking, +was about July 20, the birds left the higher ground and began to collect into +flocks in the marshy places of the tundra. I am inclined to think that the +young birds must need to wash and drink a great deal, as otherwise it is not +easy to understand why all the waders of the tundra should leave the nesting +sites so early and wander down to the sphagnum swamps. Some of the +Asiatic golden plover even crossed the mud hills and came down to the banks +of the river.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The downy young Pacific golden plover is like the +American bird of the same age except that the yellow is rather +brighter, about “lemon chrome,” and decidedly more extensive; it +predominates over the black on the crown, back, and rump; there is +very little white anywhere except in the patch under the eye and +on the chin, throat, and under parts. Miss Haviland (1915<i>a</i>), however, +says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The white tract between the homogeneous mottling of the crown and nape, +and the successive black and yellow bands which lie above and behind the eye, +and which in <i>C. apricarius</i> is sometimes hardly discernible, is very pronounced +in <i>C. fulvus</i> and has enlarged at the expense of the colored bands below it. +The nape and upper part of the body are more spotted with white, and there +is little or no yellow on the cheek below the eye.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Subsequent plumages and molts are apparently similar to those +of the other golden plovers. Doctor Henshaw (1910) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>It is of interest to note that in fall this plover migrates before it molts; in +spring it molts before it migrates. The first birds to reach the archipelago in +August are, as stated, adults, and while they are practically in full breeding +dress they begin to molt into the winter dress almost at once. The molting +season for the species is long, and many individuals, doubtless birds of the +year, may be found the last of December still molting into the fall and winter +dress. By the middle of February numerous individuals are already beginning +to molt a second time and to assume the distinctive nuptial plumage, +which, in the case of these early birds, is practically completed during the month +of March, though individuals continue to moult far into April and some no +doubt complete the final stages in Alaska. Doubtless the individuals to molt +first in spring are the adults which arrive first, and finish the fall molt first; +and doubtless, too, these are the birds first to leave Hawaii for their breeding +grounds in Alaska. So protracted is the molt of the species that it is probably +true that during the stay of this plover in Hawaii—from middle August till +May—there is not a month when some individuals are not molting.</p> + +<p>There is no reason for believing that the plover summering in the islands +which, as before stated, are chiefly if not wholly immature birds, participate +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_198">[Pg 198]</span>in the spring molt. At all events the Hawaiian summer plover and turnstones +that I have seen were, without exception, in the winter garb.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Lucien M. Turner (1886) says that, on their first arrival +in Alaska, the plover “feed principally on berries of the <i>Vaccinium</i> +and <i>Empetrum</i>, as many of these berries do not dislodge until succeeding +growths push them off.” Others have noted the same habit +in late summer and early fall. Some observers on the Pribilof +Islands have noted that they frequent the killing grounds and feed +extensively on the blowfly maggots there. But Preble and McAtee +(1923) say that in the two stomachs that they examined “none of +these larvæ were found, their food contents consisting of beetles, 72.5 +per cent; flies, 22.5 per cent; Hymenoptera, 4 per cent; and seeds +of crowberry (<i>Empetrum nigrum</i>), 1 per cent.”</p> + +<p>Doctor Henshaw (1910) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>During its stay in the islands the plover, as also the turnstone, feed chiefly +in the upland pastures and clearings, up to 6,000 or 7,000 feet, and on newly +plowed cane land. Both the sugar planter and the stock raiser have much +to thank the plover for, since, while the birds feed on small seeds to some +extent, they live chiefly on insects, and according to Perkins, on insects of +much economic importance, since they depend largely on the caterpillars of two +of the most widely spread and destructive of the island “cut worms.” These +insects are most abundant when the grass on the island pastures is green and +luxuriant, and this usually is in winter, when rains are most copious.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The general behavior of the Pacific golden plover is +not different from that of its commoner relatives. My personal acquaintance +with it was made on the high rolling tundra and the foothills +back of Nome, Alaska. Here we found it quite common during +the middle of July, where it was evidently breeding or had been +breeding; and we collected quite a series of adults, juvenals, and +even downy young. As we walked over the tundra, we frequently +heard their rich, melodious, whistling notes, or saw a richly colored +adult, in full nuptial plumage, standing like a sentinel on some little +hummock or ridge. Occasionally one would try to entice us away +by running slowly through the hollows or by fluttering along the +ground as if injured; but eventually it would take wing and circle +back to where its young were probably hidden.</p> + +<p>Mr. Brandt says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The Pacific golden plover’s adroit movements in approaching his nest, made to +deceive the hostile eye, were interesting, and well illustrate the tactics of the +members of the plover family found about Hooper Bay. He would run rapidly +without visible bodily effort, and then stop abruptly and remain motionless, not +even turning his head. His course always lay across the little ridges, never +along them, and he would follow the slight depressions, but usually came to a +halt on a little eminence. When close to me, in order to get a wider range of +vision, he would raise himself on the terminal joints of his toes and stretch up +his neck, all with a jerky motion, the whole reminding me somewhat of the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_199">[Pg 199]</span>action of the burrowing owl. If agitated he ran rapidly to and fro, uttering an +occasional piping note, but seldom taking wing.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—John T. Nichols describes the notes of this plover very well +as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I have met this western race of the golden plover only on its breeding grounds +(at Nome, Alaska) where its notes are quite unlike the flight note of the eastern +bird in migration, though some have almost an identical quality with that call. +Running about on the ground, voicing noisy protest at the invasion of its ground, +it has two unlike cries used interchangeably, <i>peep!</i> etc.; <i>toodlee</i>, etc.; the first +plaintive, the second mellow. Other less frequent notes are <i>tudleu</i> and +<i>tdlu-eep</i> suggesting the semipalmated plover. When the two members of a pair +alight together for a moment a note of greeting suggests in form the whip-poor-will’s +call, <i>piterweeu, piterweeu, piterwit</i> or <i>peeperwip, peeperweeu, peeperwip</i>.</p> + +<p>A different, striking note is associated with what seems to be nuptial display. +A bird circles at moderate height waving widespread wings in slow, measured, +tern-like manner, meanwhile uttering a loud, long-drawn, sweet <i>pee-er-wee</i>, and +in a few minutes dives to the tundra and alights. The form of this call is rather +that of the black-bellied plover though its tone is that of the golden.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Miss Haviland (1915<i>a</i>) describes similar notes and observes that, +“roughly speaking, the alarm note of the common golden plover is +monosyllabic; that of the Asiatic golden plover is dissyllabic; and +that of the gray plover is distinctly trisyllabic in character.”</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The plover which breed in Alaska migrate over Bering Sea, +stopping on the Pribilof Islands; the first birds, probably adults, +come during August; the young birds come later, mainly in September +and October, with one very late date, November 5. The few +available dates for the Aleutian and Commander Islands are also late, +September and October, probably young birds. The first birds to +reach the Hawaiian Islands are adults in breeding plumage; they +arrive about the middle or latter part of August; and Doctor +Henshaw (1910) says “that they are invariably in good flesh and +that some are very fat. Later arrivals, however, no doubt young of +the year, are comparatively poor in flesh and require considerable +time to fatten.” This flight to these islands is a most remarkable +feat, for, even granted that they can rest and feed to some extent on +the surface of the ocean, it still remains a mystery how they can find +this little group of islands in the middle of such a vast expanse of +ocean. Doctor Henshaw (1910) makes some suggestions which +throw some light on the subject; he says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>About September the wind that prevails in the North Pacific immediately +south of the Aleutians is from the northwest. It is generally believed that +migrating birds prefer to fly on a beam wind. By heading southwest, birds +migrating to Hawaii might have the northwest abeam till about the neighborhood +of latitude 30° where they would be almost sure to pick up the northeast +trades. By then changing their course to southeast they would be enabled to +fly with wind abeam till they sighted the islands. The Hawaiian Archipelago +with the chain of low islands and sand spits to the northwest afford a reasonable +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_200">[Pg 200]</span>chance for a successful landfall, since unitedly they stretch away in a very thin +line for some 2,200 miles. Moreover the islands are close enough together so +that migrants high in air would not be likely to miss them by passing between.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The birds which breed in Siberia are probably those that migrate +through Mongolia and Japan and spend the winter in India, Burma, +the Malay Archipelago, and Australia.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—Maj. G. Ralph Meyer has sent me the following notes on +this plover in the Hawaiian Islands:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The plover are very plentiful and I see them passing over every day. They +usually arrive about the middle of August and remain until the middle of +March. Along about that time of the year they seem to congregate on the flats +on the northeast end of the island and probably leave from there on the long +flight to Alaska. During the winter they alternate between the plains of the +high central plateau of the island and the lowland on both sides of the island. +On the east side there is some low grassy land and they are common there. On +this side they frequent tide flats during the low tides and then go up into the +central plateau during the high tides. They perhaps spend some of the time in +sheltered ponds on this side and wherever they can find muddy flats on which +to feed.</p> + +<p>The call note when flying is usually a whistled <i>too-whee</i>, easily imitated. +They answer to the call note very readily and we use this when hunting them. +We use plover decoys, placing them in the mud flats during high tide, and then +at the turning of the tide the birds come from the direction of the mountains +to feed. The decoys are placed on the highest part of the flats, so that the birds +will have no other place to alight. We face the decoys up the wind, as the +birds usually face that way when they are feeding. As they come near we call +to them, merely imitating their call. They will circle around and finally decoy +very nicely if they are not alarmed by any sudden movement. When circling +around decoys they make a sort of chuckling noise, which I can not describe +except as a chuckling whistle. Occasionally a wandering tattler will decoy +and very often we get turnstones. On one occasion last year I saw a flock of +about 20 to 30 birds, apparently turnstones, flying in a “V” or semicircle +formation, and the leader was undoubtedly a plover. The birds were a couple +of hundred feet in the air, so I could not be sure of the turnstones, but I was +sure of the plover. He was leading them, for they followed him wherever he +went. On a visit to Hawaii in July, 1916, I found plover on the slopes of Mauna +Loa, one of the high mountains of the island. I have never seen them on this +island during the summer.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>W. B. Alexander tells me that this plover is—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>a common visitor to Australian coasts, especially in summer, though some +appear to be present at all seasons. While in Australia this species is usually +found in small flocks and is partial to reedy swamps and the margins of lakes, +as well as to estuaries fringed with mangroves. In fact, it evidently likes cover, +though it may be met with on the open sea beach.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In his notes from Australia, Charles Barrett says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>All parts of the Commonwealth receive their quota of golden plover, and in +the southern portions of the country the birds are seen about the end of October +(early summer). The species is nowhere very plentiful (A. J. Campbell), but +I have seen it often, singly, or in small flocks, in different localities, chiefly +along the seashore and on swampy land, seeking small shellfish, etc. Sometimes +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_201">[Pg 201]</span>it associates with the black-bellied plover (<i>Squatarola squatarola</i>). In +the Capricorn Group I met with it in fair numbers on the Masthead Island +beaches. Like other migrants observed among the isles, the plover were fresh +arrivals, and each day their numbers increased. They were in poor condition +and seemed to be exhausted after their great migratory flight. Some of the +specimens taken by collectors in our party still retained some of the breeding +plumage; in one example the breast was almost black.</p> + +<p>In New South Wales I observed this species on the sand spits at the sea +entrance to Wallis Lake in October, 1921. They were wary, but through field +glasses we could see them busily seeking for food. In my own State, Victoria, +specimens have been taken both in the summer and winter plumage. The birds +frequent open grass country, as well as the seashore; in fact, they are more +abundant often in country of this class than elsewhere in a district. Frequently, +however, they are seen along river banks and on sea beaches, feeding +in company with other species.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Alaska, Asia, Australia, and Oceania; casual in Europe +and on the Pacific coast of North America.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The Pacific golden plover breed mainly in +Siberia but, as mentioned under <i>Pluvialis d. dominica</i>, they range +also to western Alaska, where they apparently meet and intergrade +with their eastern relatives. The breeding range may be stated as +extending north to eastern Siberia (Yenisei River, Cape Chelyuskin, +Liakhof Island, Nijni Kolymsk, Cape Baranof, Chaun Bay, and Cape +Serdze); and Alaska (Wainwright). East to Alaska (Wainwright, +probably Point Hope, probably Cape Blossom, Cape Prince of Wales, +Nome, St. Michael, and Igiak Bay). South to Alaska (Igiak Bay); +and Siberia (Bering Island, Kamchatka, and the Yenisei River). +West to western Siberia (Yenisei River).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range extends north to India, China, +Japan, and to Hawaiian Islands (Midway, Kauai, and Maui Islands). +East to the Hawaiian Islands (Maui), Polynesia, and New Zealand. +South to New Zealand and Tasmania. West to Tasmania, Australia, +Melanesia, Java, Borneo, and India.</p> + +<p><i>Migration.</i>—The migration of the Pacific golden plover nesting in +Alaska, appears to be entirely oceanic, the flight in both directions +being without intermediate stops. Nonbreeding individuals frequently +remain all summer in the Hawaiian Islands and at other +points in Oceania.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival are: China, Soochow, +April 18, Shanghai, April 21, and Canton, April 30; Japan, Hakodate, +May 7; Siberia, Bering Island, May 15, and Nijni Kolymsk, +May 30; and Alaska, St. Michael, May 2, Bethel, May 8, Portage +Bay, May 13, Hooper Bay, May 16, and Cape Prince of Wales, +May 19.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_202">[Pg 202]</span></p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Late dates of fall departure are: Alaska, mouth +of the Yukon River, October 12, St. Paul Island, October 25, and +Attu Island, October 31; and Siberia, Bering Island, October 28.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—This species has been reported as a casual from +Algeria, Malta, Italy, Spain, Heligoland, Poland, and the British +Isles (B. O. U.). In North America, specimens identified as this +race, have been collected in British Colombia, Comox, November 2, +3, and 4, 1903, and Masset, August 10, 1920; Washington, Kahlotus, +December 19, 1924; Idaho, Lake Chatcolet, October 1, 1923; and +Maine, Scarborough, September 11, 1911.</p> + +<p><i>Egg Dates.</i>—Bering Sea coast of Alaska: 15 records, May 23 to +July 1; 8 records, June 11 to 27. Siberia: 5 records, June 30 to +July 5.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Killdeer"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">OXYECHUS VOCIFERUS</span> <span class="smaller">(Linnaeus)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">KILLDEER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Charles Wendell Townsend</i></p> +</div> + +<p>It may be said of the killdeer that it is probably the most widely +distributed and best known of all our shore birds. Unlike most of +the group, it is not confined to the borders of lakes and of the sea +but is found in meadows, pastures, and dry uplands often many miles +from water. Unlike, also, the majority of our shore birds, its sojourn +here is not limited to the migration periods, for it breeds and winters +throughout a large portion of the United States. It is not of a +retiring disposition, and it often makes its presence known by loud +calls and cries, to which it owes both its common and scientific +names—killdeer and <i>vociferus</i>. Its strikingly marked and handsome +plumage makes it very conspicuous when it is in motion, as is nearly +always the case. In all these respects it resembles the European +lapwing, a resemblance to which both Wilson and Audubon called +attention. Wilson (1832) says that “this restless and noisy bird is +known to almost every inhabitant of the United States.”</p> + +<p>During the latter part of the last century and early in this persecution +by shooting brought down the numbers of the killdeer so that +in certain parts of the country where it formerly bred it became +extremely rare. Thus, Forbush (1925) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The killdeer was once a common breeding bird in New England. Early in +the present century it became so reduced in numbers that it was believed to +have been practically exterminated as a breeding species. * * * Legislation +protecting it perpetually has resulted in a gradual increase of the species +which is now nesting locally but not uncommonly in the coastal region and +river valleys of southern New England.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_203">[Pg 203]</span></p> + +<p>Other evidence of a similar nature is that of W. J. Brown (1916), +who says: “Ten years ago the killdeer was a rare summer resident +in the Province of Quebec. During the past five seasons the bird has +become very numerous and is now a common breeder.”</p> + +<p>The killdeer is one of the most beneficial of birds; it is a delight +to the eye as it runs along the field or swiftly flies and skims the +ground, and its familiar calls are pleasing. Long may it flourish +unharmed by man!</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The migration of the killdeer is not as marked as is that +of other shore birds whose winter station is far removed from the +summer breeding grounds, for it breeds in many places where it +winters. As a spring migrant it is one of the earliest of shore birds; +indeed, there are few land birds that precede it, coming generally in +small scattered flocks, which are augmented if the birds loiter on the +way. Prof. William Rowan writes of its migration at Edmonton, +Alberta:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>It is the first wader to come North in the spring and the last to go South +in the fall. It may arrive as early as the middle of March and stay till the +middle of November. These are remarkable dates for a shore bird in this country, +since the lakes remain frozen as a rule till the end of April and exceptionally +right into May. Even the rivers may remain solid till the middle +of April.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Lynds Jones says that the killdeer, robin, and bluebird arrive +about the same time in Ohio. M. P. Skinner writes of the killdeer +in the Yellowstone Park that—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Usually this bird arrives on warm mornings, but on one occasion they came +on a morning when the thermometer registered below zero, but a few hours +later at 10 o’clock there was a sudden change and the temperature shot up +above 40° F.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The killdeers migrate by day and also by night, their calls proclaiming +them during the darkness.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—The most noticeable courtship performances of the +killdeer are those that take place in the air—the nuptial flight—but +those that occur on the ground, although less often seen, are also +spectacular.</p> + +<p>Of the courtship in the air Dwight Isely (1912) says that in +Kansas “during the first month or six weeks after their arrival killdeers +seem to spend a large part of their time in courtship. The +male will fly back and forth over a field giving its cry sometimes for +over an hour without intermission.”</p> + +<p>Arthur T. Wayne (1910) says of the bird near Charleston: “During +very cold weather the killdeer rises several hundred yards in the +air, hovering on almost motionless wings and uttering its far-reaching +notes. I have known a pair to remain in the heavens for fully +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_204">[Pg 204]</span>an hour during the coldest weather.” M. P. Skinner of the Yellowstone +Park writes: “Although the killdeer is not a song bird I have +heard some quite musical notes and even tuneful sequences from him. +On the 4th of April one was heard singing while flying low in a +circle over the nesting ground, and the performance was strongly +suggestive of a nuptial flight song.”</p> + +<p>S. F. Rathbun of Seattle has communicated the following interesting +account of his observations on the subject:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The evolutions were participated in by both birds of the pair that I watched +on several occasions, and, as my knowledge goes, very early in spring prior to +nesting. At this time these birds were evidently mated. As they fed about +the margin of a small pond, one invariably following the other, suddenly the +bird In the lead would spring into the air and mount upwards by a succession +of wide, sweeping spirals, with its mate in pursuit constantly uttering its notes +in a short and hurried manner. Higher and higher was the flight, but restricted +over the certain area of the pond until both disappeared from one’s vision, +although the note continued to be faintly heard. As I continued to watch, the +birds’ cry ceased and down from the sky I first noted a speck falling, then +both came into plain sight, one following the other, and then both alighted. +This descent was as quickly made as if the birds fell out of the ether. After +alighting the former actions were again indulged in, and shortly after the +high flight was again made. These actions were repeated several times during +my stay of over two hours in the vicinity.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>From these reports it is evident that the courtship flight is performed +in various ways, and, as Audubon (1840) says, “It skims +quite low over the ground, or plays at a great height in the air, particularly +during the love season, when you may see these birds performing +all sorts of evolutions on the wing.”</p> + +<p>Of courtship display on the ground Theed Pearse (1924) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On two occasions that I saw one getting up he ran a short distance and then +went through what looked like a sexual display. Crouching on the ground +and leaning toward one side with wings lowered and then opening the tail in +fan shape over the back so that the cinnamon tail coverts came conspicuously +into view, at the same time uttering a trilling note.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Aretas Saunders (1926) thus describes the display:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Two birds would crouch side by side but facing in opposite directions. Then +they would droop the tips of the wings so that they exposed the ochraceous +patch of the lower back, spread the tail, and tip the breast forward, slowly +lifting the wing tips till they came way above the back, but never covered it +from view. All the while they kept up a continual call, the long-trilled note +<i>t-r-r-r-r-rrrrr</i>. The displaying birds would often begin the performance or end +it with a little fighting.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Ira N. Gabrielson (1922) reports a case where—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>the male had taken his station some distance from the female and at intervals +whirled rapidly about, uttering a curious stuttering note as he did so. Every +few seconds the female advanced a few steps toward the male, but when he +stopped to observe the effect of this display she quickly turned her back and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_205">[Pg 205]</span>appeared perfectly indifferent. This was repeated several times until the +female suddenly flew away.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>This behavior of the female is very characteristic and common in +avian, as well as in other courtship. In whirling about, the brown +tail coverts must show prominently and the “stuttering note” may +be another term for the “trilling note” used by other writers.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The killdeer nests in the open, generally in a situation +that gives the bird on the nest an extended view. The nest may be +close to water—river, lake, or pond more often than the sea—but +it is generally in fields a few feet to several hundred yards or even +a mile or two from water. Pastures, meadows, cultivated fields, and +bare gravelly ground are favorite nesting places for this bird. +Gravel roads and the spaces between the ties of a railroad and even +a graveled roof have all been chosen by this bird for laying its eggs.</p> + +<p>As a rule, the ground is slightly hollowed out for the eggs and a +few chips of stone, wood, or weed stalks are placed in and about the +hollow. Within narrow bounds there is considerable variation, and +I have here set down some of the numerous nests described. Ira N. +Gabrielson (1922) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In this region [Oregon] the favorite nesting place was at the base of a hill of +corn. As usual, little or no attempt was made to build a nest—a few pebbles +and bits of corn husks being the usual type. This material is seldom concentrated +into a nest but is scattered over an area of 1 or more square feet, the +eggs being deposited on the ground at some point within this area. * * * +A rather unusual nest was found. It was placed in a small depression and +carefully lined with shredded corn husks.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Harold C. Bryant (1914) reports in Merced County, Calif.—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Another nest found May 15 was unique in the fact that it was placed in a +small grassy knoll surrounded by water, and that the cavity was well lined +with short stems of devil grass.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>J. M. Bates (1916) says of nests found in Nebraska:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The dirt is scooped out the size of my hand and is laid with thin, flat scraps +of magnesian sand shale averaging an inch long. While a few dead stems lie +with the stones, there is no appearance of design in their presence.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Charles R. Stockard (1905) says of the killdeer in Mississippi:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The eggs are never hidden in the grass or weeds but are placed in slight +depressions on the bare ground or on short grass turf. The saucerlike depression +of a nest has scattered in it bits of shells, small pebbles, short pieces of +weeds or sticks, and often small bits of crayfish armor. This rubbish is never +arranged so as to form a real nest, since only a few bits of it are scattered in +the depression.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>M. P. Skinner writes as follows of this bird nesting in the Yellowstone +National Park:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>All the nests I have found were on high, dry land, although never more than +two or three hundred yards from water, while some were within 20 feet of it. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_206">[Pg 206]</span>One nest was in a depression in the meadow grass, but not otherwise lined or +showing any construction. All the other nests were on knolls or ridges, either +on gravel soil or on gray formation; they were in depressions varying from +a shallow saucer-shaped hollow to one that was 2 inches deep by 3 inches in +diameter; and in each case the birds appear to have taken possession of a +previous hollow, although possibly deepening and otherwise forming it to their +purpose. All nests were unlined, although one had a few sprays of sage and +phlox around the edge and another had a few shreds of dried and bleached +wood scattered about.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>John G. Tyler (1913), writing of the nests in Fresno district, +California, says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A typical nest throughout the cultivated sections is composed of a handful +of white pebbles about the size of peas and very uniform in size, mixed with an +equal number of dry shells of melon seeds of the previous year. Frequently a +few dry, broken-up pieces of melon stems are used also, the whole being spread +out over a space the size of a saucer, with the eggs resting in the center * * *. +On the summer-fallow fields only a few dry grass blades line the place where +the eggs rest, while around the ponds of the west side, the eggs generally lie +half covered in the powdered alkali dust without a scrap of nest lining.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>W. J. Brown (1916) speaks of finding many attempts at excavating +nests in the ground not far from the real nest. He suggests they +may be decoy nests. Mrs. Henry W. Nelson (1900) reports a case +where the eggs were laid in the bare gravel driveway and were moved +by the gardener to the edge of the turf out of the way of carriages. +The bird continued to incubate. W. Lee Chambers (1901) relates the +case of a killdeer’s nest between the ties on a used railroad track; +F. W. Aldrich, of one between double tracks of a well-used railroad, +and notes of a similar case to the latter have been sent by F. A. E. +Starr.</p> + +<p>Gayle Pickwell (1925) found near Lincoln, Nebr., the nest of a +killdeer in a rubbish heap of broken glass, old bottles, and other +material with which the dark mottled eggs harmonized so closely in +color that they were invisible until closely approached. In fact killdeers’ +eggs are so protectively colored for the usual surroundings +that the instinct of nest concealment by furtive abandonment is +exhibited by the killdeer as in the case of most shore birds.</p> + +<p>The most unusual case of the nesting of the killdeer is that observed +by Mr. Pickwell (1925) in the same locality on the gently sloping +tarred and graveled roof of a race-track grandstand, some 50 feet +above the ground. The eggs were laid in a slight cup-shaped depression +among the crushed stones. Close observation showed that the +relative position of the eggs in the nest was changed daily between +10.30 a. m. and 3 p. m., and it was not unusual to find them with their +points away from the center of the nest. The young were found on +the ground near the building while still but feeble walkers. In what +manner the old ones transferred them from the roof was not observed.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_207">[Pg 207]</span></p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—[<span class="smcap">Author’s note</span>: The number of eggs in a set is almost +always four, but five and three have been found. Mr. Pickwell +(1925) says the roof-nesting killdeer “laid at least three clutches of +eggs during the season extending from early April to the last of June, +and she may have raised two broods.” The eggs are ovate pyriform +in shape, usually quite pointed, and they have no gloss. The ground +colors vary from “light buff” or “cream color” to “cartridge buff” +or “ivory yellow.” They are irregularly spotted, blotched, or +scrawled, often quite boldly, with blackish brown or black; some eggs +have “sepia” blotches and some a few underlying spots of “pale +drab gray.” The measurements of 92 eggs average 36.3 by 26.6 millimeters; +the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>41.5</b> by 27, 39.5 +by <b>28</b> and <b>33</b> by <b>25</b> millimeters.]</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—The incubation period according to the observations of +J. A. Spurrell (1917) is from 24 to 25 days; according to Ira N. +Gabrielson (1922) it is 25 days. J. M. Bates (1916) found it to be +26 days and Althea E. Sherman (1916) found that 28 days elapsed +between the laying of the last egg and hatching.</p> + +<p>Both sexes incubate (F. L. Burns, 1915), and both take care of the +young. Robert B. Rockwell (1912) relates the following:</p> + +<p>“Mr. [L. J.] Hersey was fortunate enough to see one set of eggs +hatch. He says the parent birds carried every bit of shell away from +the nest within two hours after the hatching.” As soon as the moisture +has dried from the down, the young are on their feet and leave +the nest and the parents often lead them to the nearest water. They +bob and call at an early age. Althea R. Sherman (1916) had +watched a nest very closely from the beginning, but she says of the +young: “So protective was their coloration, so adroit was parental +management that they were not seen after leaving the nest until +they had attained the size of adult house sparrows.” The young +often escape notice by lying motionless on the ground. At such +times they may sometimes be picked up without showing signs of +life.</p> + +<p>Both parents play the usual wounded-bird act to beguile the +intruder from the eggs or young. The following detailed account +by Ira N. Gabrielson (1922) is worth giving here:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>It is impossible to approach the nest on foot without alarming one or other +of the birds, as one was always on guard some distance away. At the appearance +of a person walking, the one on guard would fly in a circle about the +nest, giving the alarm, at the first note of which the one on the nest ran rapidly +until some distance away and then took wing to join its mate in circling about +the intruder. A man ploughing corn was viewed with absolute indifference by +both birds, the team often passing down the row next to the nest without +disturbing the sitting bird. At an alarm, however, both birds flew about the +field unless the intruder persisted in approaching the nest. In such a case +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_208">[Pg 208]</span>one of the birds dropped to the ground near the person, invariably on the side +away from the nest, and fluttered about apparently in the greatest distress. +The attitude most frequently assumed was as follows: one wing was held +extended over the back, the other beat wildly in the dust, the tail feathers were +spread and the bird lay flat on the ground, constantly giving a wild alarm note. +This performance continued until the observer came very near when the bird +would rise and run along the ground in a normal manner or at most with one +wing dragging slightly as long as pursuit was continued. If the observer +turned back toward the nest, however, these actions were immediately repeated. +When the parents had succeeded in luring the intruder about 100 yards, they +seemed satisfied as they then flew away.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>M. P. Skinner found that when he scared one bird from the nest, +the mate was apt to steal around behind him and take its place on the +nest. He says that</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In addition to their broken-wing tactics, both of the killdeer at times would +pretend to brood anywhere on the foundation, evidently to lead me to think +that that was where their nest was. * * * On one occasion I found an +adult with one young about four days old. The youngster ran under the old +one and into its feathers; then the old bird squatted down, covering it. Just +then I saw the other bird come running and exchange with the first parent, +nestling down over the youngster.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>While the broken wing tactics are used by the birds for man, dogs, +and other predatory animals, in order to draw them away from the +eggs or young, quite different tactics are used for browsing animals +that might step on them. Thus Howard Lacey (1911) noticed that +a flock of driven goats divided. “I walked up to the place expecting +to find a rattlesnake, and found instead a killdeer standing over +her eggs with upspread wings and scolding vigorously.” Norman +Criddle (1908) writes “If the danger came from a cow or horse, +the tactics were changed and the birds with both wings and feathers +spread out would run into the animal’s face, and so by startling it +drive the intruder away.” This habit of scaring away a browsing +animal probably accounts for the following experiences related by +M. P. Skinner. The change to the broken-wing tactics appears to +show great discernment and intelligence on the part of the bird.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Twice when riding near two different unsuspected nests, the birds got up +with startled cries and faced me with their tails spread horizontally and +quivering, although I was on horseback and towered high above them. After +a few moments they made off with pretended broken wings, limping, falling +down and fluttering.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Aretas A. Saunders (1926) observed a parent very zealous in the +care of its young:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This brood of young was accompanied by a parent. They occupied a certain +section of the shore of the pond, where the young hid beneath the rushes when +danger approached, and ran over the mud flats at other times. The parent +remained near, and drove all other birds from the vicinity. While shore birds +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_209">[Pg 209]</span>and marsh birds were abundant all around the Mill Pond, at this point they +kept away because of the parent killdeer. The parent was extremely belligerent, +and I watched it attack other killdeers, yellowlegs, spotted sandpipers, +soras, and song sparrows that happened to wander in the vicinity. All birds +seemed glad to leave the vicinity.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—[<span class="smcap">Author’s note</span>: The most distinctive feature of the +downy young killdeer is the long, downy tail, black above and elsewhere +barred with “pinkish buff” and black, with long, hair-like, +buffy down below protruding beyond the rest of the tail; the forehead, +chin, throat, a ring around the neck and the under parts are +pure white, except for a tinge of pinkish buff in the center of the +forehead; a broad, black stripe above the forehead extends around +the crown to the occiput; a black stripe extends from the lores, below +the eyes to the occiput; there is a broad black stripe entirely around +the neck, below the white; the crown, auriculars, back and inner half +of the wings are grizzled “vinaceous buff” and dusky; there is a +black space in the center of the back and a black band across the +wing between the grizzled inner half and the white distal half.</p> + +<p>The juvenal plumage is similar to that of the adult, but the head +markings are less distinct; the feathers of the nape are tipped with +“amber brown” and those of the back, scapulars, wing coverts and +tertials are more or less broadly tipped or edged with the same, more +broadly on the scapulars and wing coverts and more narrowly on the +upper back and tertials; the intermediate white band on the breast is +always more or less suffused with brownish.</p> + +<p>The postjuvenal molt is apparently very limited and the first winter +plumage is largely the juvenal plumage modified by wear. It is +much like the adult except for the worn and faded edgings of the +wing coverts, and some of the scapulars and tertials and the tail, +which are retained. At the first prenuptial molt, which may take +place from February to June, the plumage becomes practically adult.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete postnuptial molt, mainly in August and +September, and a partial prenuptial molt of the body plumage in +early spring. Nuptial and winter plumages are practically alike.]</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Food.</span>—The killdeer is man’s friend. It consumes great quantities +of insect pests. The most complete study of its food by examination +of stomachs has been made by W. L. McAtee (1912) who sums up +as follows:</p> + +<p>“In all 97.72 per cent of the killdeer’s food is composed of insects +and other animal matter. The bird preys upon many of the worst +crop pests and is a valuable economic factor.” Of this large proportion +he finds that beetles constitute 37.06 per cent; other insects—grasshoppers, +caterpillars, ants, bugs, caddis flies, dragon flies, and +two-winged flies, 39.54 per cent; other invertebrates—centipedes, spiders, +ticks, oyster worms, earthworms, snails, crabs, crawfish, and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_210">[Pg 210]</span>other crustaceans, 21.12 per cent. The 2.28 per cent of vegetable matter +is chiefly made up of weed seeds such as button weed, smart weed, +foxtail grass, and nightshade. He found that various kinds of weevils +were eaten such as those of alfalfa, cotton boll, clover, rice, white +pine, etc. In a single stomach he counted 41 alfalfa weevils.</p> + +<p>Harold C. Bryant (1914<i>a</i>), during an outbreak of grasshoppers in +California, found that the contents of one stomach was 100 per cent +grasshoppers, and he estimated that each killdeer averaged 33 grasshoppers +daily. Arthur H. Howell (1906) has found that the killdeer +is among the most important of the birds that eat the cotton-boll +weevil. Samuel Aughey (1878) found 258 locusts and 190 other +insects in the stomachs of nine birds taken in Nebraska. E. R. Kalmbach +(1914) found in the stomach of a killdeer taken in a western +alfalfa field 316 weevils; in another 383. C. W. Nash (1909) has +found the stomachs of killdeers taken in orchards completely filled +with weevils. E. R. Kalmbach (1914) has also found May beetles +both in adult and grub form in the stomachs, wireworms, and insects +that attack sugar cane, corn, carrots, grape vine, sweet potato, tobacco, +and sugar beets. Caterpillars, he found to be a favorite article +of diet, also grasshoppers and crickets, crane flies and their larvae. +One stomach contained hundreds of larvae of the salt marsh +mosquito. He adds:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The killdeer thus befriends man, but it does something also for the domestic +animals, not only by eating horseflies and mosquitoes, as just mentioned, but +also by preying on ticks, including the American fever or cattle tick, which has +caused such enormous losses in some parts of the South.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Arthur T. Wayne (1910) says: “This species is very partial to +fields which are being ploughed, and at this time they are always very +tame, following each furrow as soon as it is turned over in order to +secure the worms which are exposed.” I have watched a killdeer in +a ploughed field swallowing a large earthworm. Several strenuous +gulps were needed before the act was accomplished.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The interesting behavior of this bird during courtship +and in the care of the eggs and young has already been detailed +under the appropriate headings. In general it may be said that the +killdeer has the usual plover habits when feeding of alternately +running and then of standing still, as if to listen or look, always +with head up, and of dabbing suddenly at the ground for its food. +Like some other species of plover, it occasionally bobs or “teeters” +in a nervous manner. This varies from a slight bob of the head, +which is first hitched up and then brought down, to a bob combined +with a tilting up and down of the whole body on the hips. In swift +running they excel, and this serves them to good purpose in the +pursuit of insects.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_211">[Pg 211]</span></p> + +<p>M. P. Skinner writes: “When they get out on bare ground their +speed is really astonishing. I have had them run along the road +ahead of my horse for quite a distance.” In plover fashion and +unlike sandpipers, the killdeer in feeding does not keep in a compact +flock but spreads out irregularly. John F. Ferry (1908) writes: +“A curious sight was that of numbers of these birds scattered about +the lawns at Leland Stanford University while the sprinklers were +in operation. This recalled the robins on the lawns of the Eastern +States.”</p> + +<p>Sometimes a number fairly close together may be found crouching +on the sand or gravel asleep, or they may sleep standing, often on +one foot. One or more are awake, however, watching, all from time +to time open their eyes and look about. Notwithstanding their striking +coloration, one may walk almost to a flock under these circumstances +without noticing them. The “ruptive” marks about the head +and neck break the continuity of the surface and the bird is not +recognized as such.</p> + +<p>The flight of the killdeer is rapid, generally close to the ground +when the bird is on the lookout for food, but at other times, especially +in courtship, as stated above, the flight may be at a great +height. They usually fly about singly in a wavering and erratic +manner, but sometimes in considerable flocks. Widely scattered birds +when startled usually unite into a compact flock and fly away +together. W. L. Dawson (1923) says: “I have seen flocks of 50 +killdeers bunch closely and turn in silence and disappear in perfect +order.”</p> + +<p>Whenever the killdeer is unmolested, as is the case now under +protection, it becomes very tame, as is shown above in the account of +the birds at Stanford University. N. S. Goss (1891) writes:</p> + +<p>“In Coatapec, Mexico, a pair came daily to feed and dress up their +feathers beside a little run or gutter in the center of the narrow paved +street opposite my room in the hotel, regardless of the people on the +sidewalks, only running or dodging to avoid a person crossing or to +keep out of the way of a pack of mules, etc.”</p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—The killdeer is at times the noisiest of birds and is hated +by the gunner, for its alarm cries disturb every bird within a long +range. The “song” has been described under courtship. F. M. +Chapman (1912) well characterizes some of its cries as “half-plaintive, +half-petulant.” <i>Kill-deé kill-deé</i> is the common cry from which +it takes its name, for it omits the <i>r</i> at the end. But it has a great +variety of other cries with which it rends the air, and I find in my +notes the following: <i>kee-kee</i>; <i>eet-eet-eet</i>; <i>kee-ah, kee-ah</i>; <i>dee-dee-dee</i>; +<i>tsee-he, tsee-he</i>; <i>tso-he, tso-he</i>; <i>ker, ker, ker</i>, and piercing <i>tee-ars</i>. +It is, of course difficult to express these cries properly on paper, and +a great variety of syllables have been recorded by different writers.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_212">[Pg 212]</span></p> + +<p>Aretas A. Saunders (1926) gives the following excellent description:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The calls are mainly of three sorts. The first is the common call heard +when one approaches one or more birds, or the vicinity of a nest: <i>dee dee dee +dee-ee kildee dee-ee</i>, etc., the notes usually slurred slightly upward at the end, +at least the longer ones. A second call is the long trilled <i>t-rrrrrrrrrrrrrr</i>, often +heard when the nest or young are threatened, and when the birds are fighting +or displaying. The third call is one from which the bird evidently has derived +its name. It is usually indulged by birds flying about in the air in loose +flocks, particularly early in the morning or toward evening. A number of +observers or writers on the notes of this species seem not to have separated +this call from the first one. It differs always by the fact that the notes slur +downward, instead of upward, on the end. I should write it <i>kildeeah kildeeah +kildeeah</i>, at least in those forms where the first note is lower in pitch than +the second. It is often rendered, however, when the first note is highest in +pitch, when it sounds more like <i>keedeeah keedeeah</i>.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The name <i>chewekee</i> by which it has long been known on the Carolina +coast, according to Arthur T. Wayne, is probably descriptive +of its cries.</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The killdeer is a marked bird in the field, both on +account of its plumage and on account of its voice. Its plover ways, +its long straw-colored legs, its long tail with buff-colored upper +coverts and rump and the two black bars on the breast are all good +field marks. It can not be mistaken for any other bird if these +points are borne in mind.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The fall, for the same reason as the spring migration, is +not as marked with the killdeer as with our other shore birds. William +Rowan (1926), writing of Alberta, says: “The latest killdeers +have been noted in the fall weeks after the freeze-up.” Dr. Arthur +P. Chadbourne (1889) recorded a memorable reverse flight of killdeer +in fall on the Atlantic coast, due to the great November storm +of 1888, which distributed them within a mile or two of the coast +as far north as Cape Sable, Nova Scotia.</p> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—Fortunately the killdeer is now on the protected list from +which it should never be removed, for it is too valuable and attractive +a bird to be shot for sport. Before this protection occurred, +the birds, as we have seen, were almost exterminated in some parts +of the country. In other parts, luckily, they seem to have come under +the protection of food prejudice. Thus W. L. Dawson (1909), writing +of the birds of Washington State, says, “Fortunately for them, +the flesh of the killdeer is not esteemed for food by humans, so they +are allowed to gather in peace in full companies.”</p> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—Besides man, now happily pacified, the killdeer has +little to fear in the way of enemies besides a few of the larger hawks +and owls. H. H. Kopman (1905) relates a curious case where he +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_213">[Pg 213]</span>found a killdeer caught by the leg at a crayfish hole, with one toe +already eaten off. He released the bird and cared for the wound. +The bird was able to stand and to fly away the next morning.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—It is a pleasure to have this bird wintering throughout +the southern parts of our country. B. W. Williams (1919), writing +of these birds wintering in Florida, says: “They mingled freely +with other shore birds on the beach, mud flats, and oyster beds.” +M. P. Skinner, of the birds observed at Pinehurst, says: “All through +the winter, the killdeer seemed to be roughly paired. They might +separate two or three hundred feet while feeding, but they always +came together again soon, and any intruders were promptly chased +off. The first actual mating that I saw was on January 28, 1927.”</p> + +<p>With enlightened public opinion, a knowledge of the beneficial +character of this fine bird and its perpetual protection, there seems to +be every prospect that the killdeer will always remain a joy to +nature lovers and an aid to farmers.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North and Central America, casual in South America and +the British Isles.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The killdeer breeds north to probably Mackenzie +(Fort Resolution); Alberta (Fort Chipewyan); Saskatchewan +(Buffalo Lake and Churchill River); Manitoba (probably Fort +Churchill); Ontario (probably Moose Factory and Ottawa); and +Quebec (Montreal, Godbout, and Magdalen Islands). East to Quebec +(Magdalen Islands); Maine (Bangor and Saco); New Hampshire +(Portsmouth); Massachusetts (Harvard, Cape Cod, and Chatham); +Connecticut (West Haven); New York (Plum Island, New York +City, and Staten Island); New Jersey (Red Bank and Sea Isle +City); Delaware (Lincoln); Maryland (Cambridge); North Carolina +(Pea Island and Fort Macon); South Carolina (Ladys Island +and formerly Frogmore); Georgia (Savannah and St. Simons +Island); eastern Florida (Gainesville, Fruitland Park, Indian River, +and Kissimmee); and the northern Bahama Islands (Little Abaco +and New Providence). South to the northern Bahama Islands (New +Providence); the west coast of Florida (Tarpon Springs, and probably +James Island); Alabama (Leighton and Greensboro); Louisiana +(State Game Preserve and Mermenton); Texas (Houston, +Brownsville, Hidalgo, Eagle Pass, and Fort Hancock); Durango +(Sestin); Chihuahua (Pachico and San Diego); and Lower California +(Cape San Lucas). West to Lower California (Cape San +Lucas, Victoria Mountains, San Quentin Bay, and Volcano Lake); +California, (Poway Valley, Escondido, Santa Monica, Santa Barbara, +Santa Cruz, San Francisco, probably Cahto, and Fort Crook); +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_214">[Pg 214]</span>Oregon (Tule Lake, Link River, Fort Klamath, Bandon, Dayton, and +Portland); Washington (Yakima, Fort Steilacoom, Tacoma, and +probably Lake Chelan); British Columbia (Okanagan Landing and +Cariboo District); and probably Mackenzie (Fort Resolution).</p> + +<p>There also is a somewhat questionable breeding record for the killdeer +in Yucatan (Sisal). The breeding range in the northeastern +United States became greatly restricted when this region was extensively +developed, but the birds now seem to be increasing in numbers +in this area.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range of the killdeer extends north to +British Columbia (Chilliwack and probably Okanagan Lake); Utah +(Antelope Island and Provo); Colorado (Mesa County, Boulder, and +Denver); rarely Kansas (Harper and Onaga); rarely Iowa (Wall +Lake and Grinnell); Illinois (Knoxville, La Grange, and Chicago); +rarely Indiana (Vincennes, Bicknell, La Fayette, and Indianapolis); +rarely Ohio (Hillsboro, probably Oberlin and Salem); and rarely +Massachusetts (Marblehead). East to rarely Massachusetts (Marblehead, +Boston, and Monomoy Island); rarely Connecticut (Jewett +City, Meriden, and North Haven); rarely New York (Long Island +and New York City); New Jersey (Atlantic City and Five-mile +Beach); District of Columbia (Washington); Maryland (Cambridge); +Virginia (Broadwater, James River, and Back Bay); North +Carolina (Pea Island and Ocracoke); South Carolina (Waverly +Mills, Mount Pleasant, and Frogmore); Georgia (Savannah, Blackbeard +Island, Darien, and St. Marys); Florida (Amelia Island, St. +Augustine, Daytona Beach, Titusville, and Upper Matecumbe Key); +the Bahama Islands (Nassau, Cat Island, Watling Island, and Acklin +Island); Haiti (Monte Christi, Sanchez, Samana, and El Valle); and +Porto Rico (San Juan). South to Porto Rico (San Juan, Caguas, +and Mayaguez); rarely Panama (Davila); and Costa Rica (mouth of +the Diquis, San Jose, and Miravalles). West to Costa Rica (Miravalles); +Guatemala (Atitlan and Coban); Jalisco (Ocotlan); Sinaloa +(Mazatlan); Lower California (San Jose del Cabo, La Paz, San +Quentin, and the Colorado River delta); California (Escondido, Los +Angeles, San Fernando, Santa Barbara, San Francisco, and Napa); +Oregon (Corvallis, Rickreall, and Netarts Bay); Washington +(Camas, Tacoma, Dungeness Spit, and Bellingham Bay); and +British Columbia (Chilliwack).</p> + +<p>The killdeer winters also in Bermuda, and is of casual occurrence at +this season in southern New Hampshire (Isle of Shoals) and in +Michigan (Plymouth).</p> + +<p>The West Indian killdeer has been described as a distinct subspecies +(<i>Oxyechus vociferus rubidus</i>), and is resident. The North +American form does, however, regularly migrate to those islands, and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_215">[Pg 215]</span>it may winter there in larger numbers than is now known. Extensive +collecting at this season will be necessary to decide this matter.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: New York, +Montauk Point, February 17, New York City, February 20, Branchport, +March 1, Albany, March 3, and Rochester, March 5; Connecticut, +New Haven, February 24, Jewett City, March 2, Fairfield, March +3 and Carrollton, March 4; Rhode Island, Block Island, February 27, +Westerly, February 28, Newport, March 4; Massachusetts, Muskeget +Island, February 28, and Amherst, March 10; Vermont, Rutland, +March 27; Maine, Waterville, March 11, and Farmington, March 28; +Quebec, Montreal, March 25; Michigan, Petersburg, February 4, Ann +Arbor, February 14, Vicksburg, February 21, and Kalamazoo, February +28; Ontario, Point Pelee, March 2, London, March 4, Hamilton, +March 8, Toronto, March 20, and Ottawa, March 26; Iowa, Bentonsport, +February 22, Keokuk, February 28, Iowa City, February 28, +Fairfield, March 3, and National, March 5; Wisconsin, Unity, March +1, Camp Douglas, March 2, and Racine, March 3; Minnesota, Heron +Lake, March 5, Jackson, March 10, Red Wing, March 12, and Lanesboro, +March 13; Kansas, Harper, February 4, Wichita, February 7, +Topeka, February 15, Onaga, February 22, and Independence, February +25; Nebraska, Omaha, February 19, Dunbar, February 21, and +Falls City, February 23; South Dakota, Yankton, March 10, Huron, +March 11, and Rapid City, March 12; North Dakota, Argusville, +March 15, Fargo, March 18, and Bismarck, March 23; Manitoba, Margaret, +March 23, Aweme, March 23, Pilot Mound, March 25, Treesbank, +March 28, and Winnipeg, April 12; Saskatchewan, Indian +Head, March 27, Eastend, March 27, Lake Johnston, March 30, April +2, and Carleton House, April 6; Wyoming, Yellowstone Park, March +12, and Laramie, March 16; Idaho, Neeley, February 1, Meridian, +February 3, and Rathdrum, February 19; Montana, Wisdom, March +5, and Missoula, March 12; and Alberta, Flagstaff, April 2, Nanton, +April 8, Veteran, April 10, Red Deer, April 11, and Edmonton, +April 15.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure from the southern part of the +winter range are not numerous, but killdeers have been observed in +spring in Panama, March 3; Costa Rica, San Jose, March 15, and +Porto Rico, San Juan, March 26.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—The arrival of these birds in that part of the +winter range that is south of the breeding range, likewise has not +been carefully recorded. Arrivals at this season have been reported +from Porto Rico, Aguadilla, October 7; Guatemala, San Geronimo, +October 29, Costa Rica, San Jose, October 15; and Nicaragua, +Escondido River, November; and Panama, November 26.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_216">[Pg 216]</span></p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Alberta, Veteran, September 15, +Innisfree-Mundare, September 17, and Edmonton, September 22; +Montana, Missoula, December 25 (possibly winters occasionally); +Idaho, Meridian, December 14, and Rupert, December 23; Saskatchewan, +Eastend, October 10; Manitoba, Treesbank, October 11, +Winnipeg, October 12, Aweme, October 15, and Margaret, October +15; North Dakota, Charlson, October 8, and Fargo, October 15; +South Dakota, Forestburg, October 30, Sioux Falls, November 7, and +Yankton, November 11; Nebraska, Nebraska City, November 10, +Beatrice, November 16, and Lincoln, November 18; Kansas, Hayes, +November 3, Onaga, November 8, Lawrence, November 11, and +Harper, November 25; Minnesota, Correll, October 23, Hutchinson, +October 25, Elk River, October 26, and St. Paul, November 26; +Wisconsin, Genoa Junction, November 13, Madison, November 14, and +Racine, November 16; Iowa, Emmetsburg, November 13, Grinnell, +November 15, Keokuk, November 17, and Coralville, November 20; +Ontario, Reaboro, November 4, Port Dover, November 8, Listowel, +November 10, and Harrow, November 15; Michigan, Croswell, November +4, Sault Ste. Marie, November 5, Jackson, November 9, +Livonia, November 13, and Ann Arbor, November 19; Quebec, Montreal, +October 26; Maine, Phillips, October 24, and Cape Elizabeth +(exceptional), December 25; New Hampshire, Hampton Beach, December +25; Vermont, Bennington, November 12; Massachusetts, +Harvard, December 5, and Chatham, December 17; Connecticut, +Meriden, November 22, and Hartford, November 30; and New York, +Collins, November 22, Rhinebeck, November 24, Branchport, November +29, and Montauk Point, December 10.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The killdeer has been taken both north and south +of its normal range in the Western Hemisphere, and casually in the +British Isles. In Nova Scotia it was reported from Halifax Harbor +on December 5, 1876, and at Meaghers Beach, on January 1 (Downs); +Macoun (1909) notes it as a rare migrant in Newfoundland without +further details; and a specimen in the British Museum was taken +in the Hudson’s Bay region. In Alaska, one was reported as seen in +August, 1898, on the Kuskokwim River (Hinckley), and a specimen +was collected on the Stikine Flats, May 10, 1907 (Willett).</p> + +<p>In South America specimens have been reported from several +countries but so few in number it does not appear likely that any +part of that continent should be included in the regular range. +Among these records are: Chile and Paraguay (specimens in the +British Museum, date and exact locality of collection unknown); +Peru (Tambo Valley, October 25, 1867, Callao [Cassin], Pacasmayo, +June, 1877 [Taczanowski], and Arequipa [Sclater and Salvin]); +Ecuador (Chaupi, in June [Salvadori and Festa], and Sical, specimen +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_217">[Pg 217]</span>in British Museum); and Colombia (specimen from Medellin +in the British Museum).</p> + +<p>This species has been taken or observed on a few occasions in +England and Scotland (Peterhead, Aberdeenshire, 1867, near Christchurch, +Hanto, April, 1857, Kent, April, 1908, Hampshire, April, +1859, and the Scilly Islands, January, 1885), and in Ireland (County +Dublin, January 12, 1928).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—California: 73 records, March 15 to July 2; 37 records, +April 3 to May 13. Michigan and Wisconsin: 15 records, April +5 to July 6; 8 records, April 29 to June 13. Pennsylvania and New +Jersey: 29 records, April 1 to July 17; 15 records, May 2 to 29. +Florida: 11 records, May 3 to June 30; 6 records, May 22 to June 9. +Texas: 11 records, March 3 to June 2; 6 records, April 3 to June 1.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Semi"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">CHARADRIUS SEMIPALMATUS</span> Bonaparte</p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">SEMIPALMATED PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed, by Charles Wendell Townsend</i></p> +</div> + +<p>This charming little wader, familiarly known as ring-necked +plover or ringneck, is, during migrations, an abundant frequenter of +our seashores as well as of the shores of lakes and rivers. But +it was not as abundant in the latter part of the last century and +in the beginning of this, for, as William Brewster (1925) says: +“Both ringnecks and peeps began to diminish appreciably in numbers +soon after 1890, and have since continued to do so, no doubt +because of the ever-multiplying gunners.” Fortunately the Federal +law for migratory birds, passed in 1913 and extended to Canada +in 1916, enforced by the enabling act in 1918, has since protected the +ringneck at all times, and he has responded markedly. Flocks of +several hundred are now common where flocks of 30 or 40 were +becoming rare. Their confiding nature and handsome plumage make +them most interesting and attractive.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—Like most of the shore birds, the semipalmated plover +seems to be in a great hurry to visit the breeding grounds. While, +in the region of Massachusetts he leisurely wends his way southward +from about July 12 to the end of October, a period of four months, +the spring flight rarely lasts little longer than a month, from +May 7 to June 14. Wells W. Cooke (1912) says: “At least four-fifths +of the dates on the spring migration of this species fall in +May. This is true for the entire district between the winter and +summer homes, and the dates indicate that the migration in the +United States occurs chiefly between May 10 and June 1.”</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_218">[Pg 218]</span></p> + +<p>Migration occurs both by day and by night. Flock after flock +may be seen on favorable days flying north along a beach, and the +distinctive calls of the bird may be heard at night. I have recognized +them clearly on a foggy May night when the birds were passing +over the city of Boston. There are also records of the striking of +lighthouses by these plover during the night.</p> + +<p>It is evident that late migrants flying north in the spring must +be late in returning, if they rear families, while those that return +early in July must have been the early ones to migrate north. On +July 30, 1918, I saw three semipalmated plover flying north along the +shore at Ipswich. They were in full cry, and I wondered whether +they were very late spring migrants or early autumn migrants temporarily +turning back, or sterile birds that had no interest in the +breeding grounds.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—In the latter part of May and early in June on the +southern Labrador coast I have seen this bird flying about in circles +uttering its loud and rapidly repeated courtship song. The song, +which is entirely unlike the call note, may be heard, and the courtship +performance watched, not only in the spring but in the autumn +migrations, for there is a recrudescence of the amatory instinct at +this season in most birds. The song, if such it may be called, is +then generally given from the ground and may be likened to a +whinny or to the sound of a bouncing ball. The notes are at first +slowly repeated, but the speed increases until the notes follow one +another so rapidly that they nearly run together. The birds that +utter this song crouch low with tails spread and slightly cocked, +wings partly open, and feathers, particularly of the breast and flanks, +puffed out. Sometimes one walks in this way around another, sometimes +two face each other, crouched motionless and then spring at +each other and up into the air like fighting cocks. Sometimes one +runs after another which, on taking flight is followed by the first, +but the most amusing form of this courtship is where two, thus +flattened, spread, and puffed, walk slowly side by side as if they +were doing a cakewalk, all the time uttering their clucking song.</p> + +<p>H. S. Swarth communicates the following notes regarding courtship +seen in northwestern British Columbia: “On as late a date +as June 25 a male bird was seen going through with the mating +antics, following the female about with head lowered and breast +puffed out to an absurd degree, uttering frequently a low call note.”</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—A mere depression in the sand without lining or with +only a few bits of shells or grass generally constitutes the nest of this +species. P. B. Philipp (1925), writing of his experience in the +Magdalens, says: “A nest as such is not constructed. A shallow +hollow is scratched in the sand, and this is lined with bits of dead +eel-grass, or a hollow is scratched in a bunch of dead seaweed.” +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_219">[Pg 219]</span>H. S. Swarth sends the following notes of his experience with the +nesting of this bird in the Atlin region of northwestern British +Columbia:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A pair or two are pretty sure to be found where favorable conditions exist, +but as the species requires an expanse of sandy or gravelly beach and as such +beaches are not the rule about the lakes of the region, there are long stretches +of shore line where the plovers are not found. They avoid rocky or stony +beaches that are so favored by the spotted sandpipers.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>He found his first nest, an unusual one, on the shore of Lake Atlin +on June 10, and thus describes it:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The “nest” was in hard-packed gravel in a hole about 1 inch deep and with +practically vertical sides. This depression was nearly filled with small chips +and a very few straws. The eggs were nearly perpendicular in the nest, points +down. It must have been some little labor for the bird to make this excavation, +for the gravel was hard enough to retain the shape of the hole throughout the +rest of the summer. I returned to the spot in September and found the cavity +still sharply defined.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Audubon (1840) says of his experience in Labrador that this plover +forms no nest, but makes a “cavity in the moss, in a place sheltered +from the north winds and exposed to the full rays of the sun, usually +near the margins of small ponds formed by the melting of the snow, +and surrounded by short grass.”</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—[<span class="smcap">Author’s note</span>: The semipalmated plover lays four eggs, +often only three. They are ovate pyriform to subpyriform in shape, +with little or no gloss. The ground colors vary from “buckthorn +brown” or “clay color” to “cartridge buff,” “olive buff” or “pale +olive buff.” They are boldly and irregularly marked with small or +large spots or blotches of black, brownish black or very dark browns; +some eggs are heavily blotched with “warm sepia” or “chestnut +brown”; there are usually a few small underlying spots of “pale +drab gray.” The measurements of 100 eggs average 33 by 23.5 +millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>36.2</b> by +24.3, 35.5 by <b>25.5</b> and <b>29.5</b> by <b>22</b> millimeters.]</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—The duration of incubation is not known. In the allied +ringed plover of Europe the period of incubation is stated by Dr. +W. H. Bergtold (1917) to be 22 and 23 days.</p> + +<p>In the past it has generally been assumed that, with the exception +in the case of the phalaropes, the female among the shore birds incubates +the eggs and takes charge of the young. Joseph Dixon (1927) +says: “After several seasons’ experience with breeding shore birds +in the north the writer has come to believe that in more of our Limicolae +than is generally known it is a common practice for the males +to take a leading part in domestic duties not only in incubation but +also in the care and training of the downy young.” With specimens +in hand during the breeding season, he found incubating patches in +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_220">[Pg 220]</span>the male semipalmated plover, and he says that “the males did a +large part of the incubation and that it was the males that were the +most fearless in the face of danger when caring for their young.”</p> + +<p>P. B. Philipp (1925), on the other hand, studying the nesting bird +in the Magdalens, writes: “I judge that the female does most of the +incubating, three birds shot off the nest being of this sex.” H. S. +Swarth also sustains the side of the female, for he writes: “With +binoculars it is often possible to distinguish the sexes of the plovers, +and it could be seen that it was the male who tired first in such efforts +[shamming injury] to deflect danger from the nest. Even when he +withdrew entirely, the female continued her protests until we were +well out of her territory.” Dr. L. B. Bishop (1900), however, reconciles +both points of view, for he says: “Bare pectoral spaces showed +that both sexes assisted in incubation.”</p> + +<p>The young leave the nest and run after the parents almost as soon +as they are hatched. Bishop (1900) in the Yukon River region +found an egg that was already pipped. He says: “I removed the +young bird from the shell, and within half an hour the down was +almost dry, the eyes were open, and it could hop about on its ‘knees.’”</p> + +<p>Dr. W. H. Osgood (1909) reports the following observation by +N. Hollister on a downy young of this species: “Although it was +perfectly able to run about as fast as the adults, it at once lay flat +to the ground when approached, with head extended forward in the +sand, making it very difficult to see, so closely did it match the ground +in color.”</p> + +<p>The actions of the parent incubating the eggs when a human +intruder appears is well told by H. S. Swarth in a communication, +as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The breeding bird skulked from the nest at the first appearance of an intruder, +and, after performing an unobtrusive retreat to a distant point, launched +out in conspicuous protest at the trespass. The call notes served to summon +the mate, and sometimes even another pair of birds, all hovering about overhead +or racing close by over the sand. A liquid call note, not particularly loud, was +uttered constantly, and both birds of a pair would go through the form of +pretended injury, dragging themselves over the sand with drooping wings and +spread tail.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In another case—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A bird was flushed, as it had been many times before, at a point 300 yards +or more above the water line, and I sat down quietly to watch her from the +shelter of a scrubby willow. She flew to a distance, but returned in a few +minutes, to run aimlessly about over the gravel nearby. Gradually she drew +away, running over and between logs and other drift, her manner changing +from one of noisy protest to furtive withdrawal behind any available cover. +Finally, about 20 minutes after I began to watch, she settled down on the +gravel, as it developed, upon the eggs.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_221">[Pg 221]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p>At Seal Island, off the southern point of Nova Scotia, I found +several breeding pairs of semipalmated plover, here, probably, at its +most southern breeding place. On one occasion I came upon a bird +that performed the usual wounded bird act, falling on its side and +fluttering its wings as if badly injured. Presently it made off, fluttering +and dragging its spread tail on the ground, keeping up this +method of progression for over a hundred yards, although I had +stood still. I then walked in the opposite direction and found a +downy young running off in company with the other parent.</p> + +<p>On another occasion at Great Caribou Island, Labrador, one of +these birds appeared greatly excited at my presence, alighting near +me, bobbing nervously, and protesting in conversational tones. Then +it flew away, but immediately returned and flew by several times +within a few yards, apparently in great fury, but not daring to +hit me.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—[<span class="smcap">Author’s note</span>: In natal down the young semipalmated +plover is darkly colored above. The entire upper parts, from +forehead to rump, are mottled with “deep olive buff” and black. +The auriculars and a broad band encircling the back of the head are +velvety black; there is a distinct black stripe from the bill to the +eye and from the lores to the auriculars. A spot under the eye, a +ring around the neck, and the entire underparts are pure white.</p> + +<p>In fresh juvenal plumage the crown, back, rump, scapulars, and +wing coverts are “buffy brown,” narrowly edged with creamy or +buffy white, the edgings broadest on the wing coverts; the lores, +cheeks, and a broad band across the chest are “buffy brown” to +“sepia”; the forehead, throat, a ring around the neck, and the entire +underparts are white; the tail is like the adult, but tipped with +“pinkish buff.” The buffy edgings mostly wear away before the +partial postjuvenal molt, which occurs in late fall. The first winter +plumage is like the adult winter plumage, except that some of the +juvenal wing coverts are retained and the head is as in the juvenal. +At the next molt, a partial prenuptial, the plumage becomes practically +adult; only a few old wing coverts remain.</p> + +<p>Adults have a partial prenuptial molt in the spring involving the +body plumage, some scapulars and wing coverts, and a complete +postnuptial molt from July to December; I have seen the wings +molted as early as July 30 and as late as December 10. The sexes +are alike in immature and winter plumage and not very different in +spring, when the black markings of the female are duller or mixed +with grayish brown. In both sexes in winter the black markings +are replaced by grayish brown.]</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The semipalmated plover is an active feeder and in this +way is sometimes beneficial to man. In the stomachs of 12 birds +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_222">[Pg 222]</span>shot on beaches I have found worms, small mollusks (<i>Litorina</i>, <i>Mytelis</i>), +various crustaceans (<i>Orchestia</i>, <i>Gammarus</i>, <i>Limnoria</i>), and +insects.</p> + +<p>W. L. McAtee (1911) says that this bird eats the larvae of the +salt marsh mosquito (<i>Ædes sollicitans</i>). Samuel Aughey (1878) +investigated the relation of birds to insects in Nebraska during the +great invasion of Rocky Mountain migratory locusts on the western +prairies and plains of the United States from 1873 to 1876. Of 11 +stomachs of this species examined, he found the average number of +locusts in each was 38; of other insects, 19. Junius Henderson +(1927) states that this plover “on coast, feeds largely on crustaceans, +mollusks, eggs of marine animals, and insects; interior, feeds on +locusts and other Orthoptera, and many other insects.” Audubon +(1840) says: “At this period (September) they are now and then +observed on plowed lands, where they appear to procure different +species of seeds and insects.”</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The behavior of this bird during courtship and in the +care of the eggs and young has already been described. On beaches +and mud flats it is sometimes difficult to see, notwithstanding its +strikingly marked plumage. As the piping plover matches the dry +sand, so the semipalmated plover matches the wet sand, its favorite +feeding grounds. Here one may walk almost onto them without +seeing them if they stand motionless, as they often do. While sleeping +on the dry sand, even with the black and white markings in plain +sight, they are also difficult to see. W. V. Praeger (1891) writes as +follows of a wounded bird he observed hiding in a hollow in the +sand:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>While admiring the perfect blending of its brown shades with the surroundings +I saw in its white rings one of the commonest objects of the seashore—the +empty half of a bivalve shell. The white about the base of the bill was the +“hinge,” the collar the outer rim, and the top of the head the cavity of the +shell filled—as they usually are—with sand.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Gerald H. Thayer (1909), writing of the very similar ringed plover +of Europe, speaks of the “eye-masking and ‘obliterative’ shadow-and-hole-picturing +pattern.”</p> + +<p>Although this bird migrates and feeds both by day and night, it +often happens that a flock is discovered at sunset out of reach of the +tide, clustered together as if they had settled down for the night. +That they spend the night there in some cases at least is shown by +William Brewster (1925), who says: “I have repeatedly observed +them standing motionless, singly or in clustering groups, on some +mud bar to which they had thus returned, keeping them in view until +it was too dark to see them longer and finding them all there the +next morning.”</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_223">[Pg 223]</span></p> + +<p>During high tide, when their best feeding grounds are covered, these +birds, like many other shore birds, are very apt to be found sleeping +on the upper beach above the reach of the waves. The flock is generally +huddled closely together, some standing but many squatting +with their breasts resting on the sand, often in the lee of bunches of +seaweed. While some sleep with heads turned to one side and bills +thrust into the feathers of the back in the usual manner of birds, +others sleep with heads sunk down between the shoulders. Generally +some of the flock are awake and on the lookout, while the others open +their eyes from time to time.</p> + +<p>In flight the flocks are often compact, twisting and turning as if +animated by a single thought, but they also fly in loose order. On +alighting they at once spread out on the sand in true plover fashion, +and do not, like sandpipers, keep together and move along close to the +wave line. Another plover habit which at once distinguishes them +from sanderlings or other sandpipers of a similar size, is that of running +about with heads up and dabbing suddenly at the ground from +time to time instead of moving along with heads down diligently +probing the sand. With erect figures they run about in various directions, +often pausing and standing still as if in thought, occasionally +jerking or bobbing their heads and necks and ever and again swiftly +dabbing at some morsel of food.</p> + +<p>The semipalmated plover associates most frequently with the least +and semipalmated sandpipers, but it also flies with sanderlings and +other larger waders. Sometimes these birds fly in mixed flocks, but +as a rule the ringnecks keep by themselves in flight, but readily join +other species on the ground.</p> + +<p>On the seacoast the ringneck frequents the outer beaches, the shores +and mud flats of estuaries and tidal pools, and the sloughs in the +salt marshes. Inland it visits similar regions on the shores of lakes +and rivers as well as upland fields in search of food. As I have said +elsewhere (C. W. Townsend, 1905):</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Like all shore birds also, the ringneck is often exceedingly fat in the autumn, +and I have known the fat of the breast to split open when the bird struck the +ground after being shot when flying at a height. The fat is not only everywhere +under the skin, but it develops all the viscera, and the liver is often pale from +fatty infiltration. How birds under these circumstances are able to fly so +vigorously on their long migrations, or even to fly at all, is certainly a mystery.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—The courtship song has already been described. The common +call note is a clear, rather plaintive, whistle of two notes, very +distinctive and frequently emitted while the birds are on the wing. +It is expressed by Hoffmann (1904) by the syllables <i>chee-wee</i>; Nichols +(1920) writes it <i>tyoo-eep</i>. It is cheerful and businesslike compared +with the sweet and mournful whistle of the piping plover. When +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_224">[Pg 224]</span>calling to others as they alight, or when standing on the sand, they +often emit a single note, sweet and clear, but at times harsh and +rasping.</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The semipalmated plover is easily distinguished in +the field from the killdeer by its smaller size, its single neck ring, and +by the absence of the rufous color on the rump. Its darker colors +distinguish it from the piping plover. From the sandpipers, even at +a distance on the sand, it is distinguished most readily by its plover +behavior, as already described. In flying they show a faint white +line on the wings which contrasts with the general brown of the upper +parts. The neck ring is noticeable both in the flying and walking +bird, and the orange yellow of the tarsi and base of the bill can be +made out with glasses. In the young, which arrive on the Massachusetts +coast about a month behind their elders in the autumn migration, +the ring is gray instead of glossy black, and the tarsi are pale yellow. +It may be distinguished from the Wilson’s plover by the fact that that +bird has a much longer bill, wholly black.</p> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—Although this little plover was formerly shot as game in +the same manner as is described under the least and semipalmated +sandpipers, it is now protected at all seasons. Besides its value as a +destroyer of harmful insects, its greatest value is aesthetic. On the +beaches of the sea and lakes its graceful flight, handsome plumage, +and confiding ways are a source of great pleasure, and on this account +alone it is worthy of protection for all time.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The fall migration, as stated above, is a long and leisurely +one, differing markedly in this respect from the spring migration. +When a favorable spot is found, abounding in food and free from +disturbances, these birds are apt to tarry there for some time. Here +they grow fat and here they indulge in courtship performances as +if it were the spring of the year. On beaches and marshes, where in +former times gunners, hidden in blinds, were lurking to destroy +them, all is now peace and quiet for these little birds, and their +journey southward is undisturbed.</p> + +<p>Of the fall migration Wells W. Cooke (1912) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At one of the most southern breeding places near York Factory, Keewatin, in +1900, the most advanced young were still in the downy stage July 10 (Preble), +and yet by this time the species is already in full fall migration, and the earliest +individuals have appeared several hundred miles south of the breeding range. +* * * Though most semipalmated plover migrate early, a few stay until +freezing weather.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The adults migrate first, while the young rarely arrive on the Massachusetts +coast before August 15.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—Although the majority of the species winter south of +the United States, as is shown under “winter range,” some are to be +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_225">[Pg 225]</span>found at this season on the shores of the Southern and Gulf States +earning their living in pursuit of their small prey.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North and South America.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The breeding range of the semipalmated plover +extends north to Alaska (Morzhovia Bay, Hooper Bay, and the Colville +delta); northern Mackenzie (Mackenzie delta, Lower Anderson +River, Franklin Bay, Horton River, and Bernard Harbor); Keewatin +(Whale Point); Franklin (Annanostook and Kingnite Fjord); +Victoria Land; Baffin Island; and western Greenland (Disco). East +to western Greenland (Disco); Labrador (Port Burwell, Okak, and +Tessiujaksoak); Newfoundland (Straits of Belle Isle); eastern Quebec +(Upper Hamilton River, Wapitagun Island, Magdalen Islands, +and Mingan Islands); and Nova Scotia (Sable Island). South to +Nova Scotia (Sable Island and Yarmouth County); probably rarely +New Brunswick (Grand Manan); northern Ontario (Moose Factory); +Manitoba (Hayes River and Fort Churchill); southern Mackenzie +(Artillery Lake); Yukon (Lake Marsh); and British Columbia +(Graham Island). West to British Columbia (Graham Island); +and Alaska (Berg Bay, Glacier Bay, and Morzhovia Bay).</p> + +<p>In common with several other shore birds, nonbreeders remain +throughout the summer in southern latitudes. At this season they +have been taken or observed south to Venezuela (Margarita Island), +Galapagos Islands, Costa Rica, the West Indies, and Jalisco (Ocotlan), +while they frequently are fairly common on the coasts of the +United States and at points in the interior, Ohio (Lakeside and +Oberlin), and Michigan (Detroit).</p> + +<p>Kumlien and Hollister report obtaining young not yet able to fly +at Lake Koshkonong, Wis., but if their identification was correct, +this record must be considered accidental. The species also has been +reported in summer from eastern Siberia (East Cape), where it +may breed.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range extends north to California +(rarely Palo Alto); Texas (Brownsville and Corpus Christi); Louisiana +(State Game Preserve); Mississippi (Biloxi); probably Alabama +(Coffee Island); South Carolina (Dewees Island); and Bermuda +(Somerset). East to Bermuda (Somerset); South Carolina +(Port Royal); Georgia (Savannah, Blackbeard Island, and Darien); +Florida (Amelia Island, Mayport, Daytona, Mosquito Inlet, Upper +Metacumbe Key, and Key West); the Bahama Islands (Abaco, New +Providence, Watling Island, and Great Inagua); Haiti (Monte +Cristi, and Samana); Porto Rico; the Lesser Antilles (Anegada, +Sombrero Key, St. Bartholomew, Carriacou, and Trinidad); Guiana +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_226">[Pg 226]</span>(Abary River and Cayenne); Brazil (Island of Mixiana, Cajetuba +Island, Pernambuco, Bahia, Abrolhos Island, Peranagua, and Santa +Catarina); and Argentina (Puerto Deseado). South to Argentina +(Puerto Deseado and Jujuy); and Chile (Calbuco). West to Chile +(Calbuco, Coquimbo, and Moreno Bay); Peru (Chorillos, Ancon, +Trujillo, and Payta); Ecuador (Puna Island, Guayaquil, and Santa +Elena); Galapagos Islands (Albemarle and Narboro); Costa Rica; +Honduras (Manatee Lagoon); Guatemala (Chiapam); Oaxaca (San +Mateo); Sinaloa (Mazatlan); Lower California (La Paz); and +California (San Diego, San Pedro, Saticoy, Pacific Grove, and +rarely Palo Alto).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: Virginia, +Arlington Beach, April 30; District of Columbia, Washington, +May 3; Pennsylvania, Wayne, May 5, and Erie, May 8; New Jersey, +Cape May, April 24, Camden, May 5, and Long Beach, May 10; +New York, Long Island, April 19, Orient, May 2, Geneva, May 5, +and Rochester, May 16; Connecticut, New Haven, May 1, and Fairfield, +May 4; Rhode Island, Newport, April 15; Massachusetts, Rehoboth, +April 21, Monomoy Island, April 28, and Dennis, May 5; +Maine, Saco, May 5; Quebec, Quebec City, May 6, Montreal, May +19, Godbout, May 28, Eskimo Point, June 3, and Fort Chimo, June +11; Nova Scotia, Pictou, May 9, and Antigonish, May 15; Franklin, +Winter Island, May 31; Missouri, St. Louis, April 2, and Kahoka, +April 4; Illinois, Rantoul, April 9, near Chicago, April 25, and +Cantine, April 26; Indiana, Denver, May 1, Terre Haute, May 5, +and Bloomington, May 9; Ohio, Sandusky, April 20, Cleveland, +April 21, and Oberlin, April 24; Michigan, Ann Arbor, May 5, +Jackson, May 8, and Grand Rapids, May 9; Ontario, Toronto, April +21, Hamilton, April 24, Ottawa, May 9, and Guelph, May 15; Iowa, +Sioux City, April 22, Ogden, April 24, and Emmetsburg, April 27; +Wisconsin, Madison, May 5; Minnesota, Heron Lake, May 8, and +Minneapolis, May 11; Kansas, Lawrence, April 22, Emporia, April +25, and McPherson, May 3; Nebraska, Lincoln, April 27; South +Dakota, Vermilion, April 20, and Brookings, May 8; Manitoba, +Brandon, April 28, and Reaburn, May 9; Saskatchewan, Lake Johnston, +May 10; Mackenzie, Fort Simpson, May 16, and Fort Resolution, +May 23; Alberta, Veteran, April 24, Camrose, May 6, Tofield, +May 12, Peace River, May 20, and Fort Chipewyan, May 23; +northern California, Eureka, April 17; Nevada, Smoky Creek, May +4; Washington, Destruction Island, April 24, and Grays Harbor, +April 30; British Columbia, Ucluelet, April 28, and Comox, May 3; +Yukon, Forty-mile, May 23; and Alaska, Admiralty Island, May 8, +Bethel, May 10, Bristol Bay, May 15, Coronation Island, May 15, +and Hooper Bay, May 19.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_227">[Pg 227]</span></p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Brazil, Cajetuba Island, April +18; Colombia, Sabanilla, March 27; Porto Rico, Luquillo, March 5, +and Vieques Island, March 30; Haiti, Samana, April 13; Bahamas, +Abaco, April 28, and Green Cay, April 29; Florida, Daytona Beach, +May 25, Punta Rassa, May 25, and Pensacola, May 30; Georgia, +Savannah, May 13; South Carolina, Kiawah Island, June 2, and +Bulls Bay, June 7; North Carolina, Pea and Bodie Islands, May 17; +Cape Hatteras, May 20, and Raleigh, May 22; Virginia, Cape +Charles, May 24, Smiths Island, May 25, and Wallops Island, May +30; District of Columbia, Alexander Island, May 22, and Washington, +May 25; Maryland, Patapsco Marsh, May 29; Pennsylvania, +State College, May 30, Wayne, June 1, and Erie, June 2; New Jersey, +Cape May County, May 23, Elizabeth, May 30, and Camden, June +1; New York, Canandaigua, June 7, Geneva, June 9, Orient, June +10, and New York City, June 14; Connecticut, New Haven, June 1, +and Fairfield, June 8; Massachusetts, Lynn, June 5, Harvard, June +9; and Dennis, June 10; Maine, Portland, June 3; Louisiana, Lobdell, +May 18; Missouri, St. Joseph, May 13, and Corning, May 18; +Illinois, Chicago, May 29, Morgan Park, May 30, and Rantoul, +June 2; Indiana, Lake County, May 27; Ohio, Columbus, May 28, +Oberlin, May 29, and Lakeside, June 2; Michigan, Detroit, May 30, +Sault Ste. Marie, May 31; Ontario, Ottawa, May 31, Hamilton, June +3, and Toronto, June 6; Iowa, Emmetsburg, May 20, and Sioux +City, May 30; Wisconsin, Shiocton, May 28, and Madison, May 30; +Minnesota, Lanesboro, May 23, Hallock, May 29, and Minneapolis, +June 4; Texas, Corpus Christi, May 18; Kansas, Lawrence, May 18; +Nebraska, Lincoln, May 20; South Dakota, Vermilion, May 19, Dell +Rapids, May 22; and Forestburg, May 27; Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg, +June 7, and Shoal Lake, June 12; Lower California, San Geronimo +Island, April 13, Cerros Island, April 17, and Gardeners +Lagoon, April 24; California, San Diego, April 23, Alameda, May +14, Fresno, May 15, and Santa Barbara, May 22; Washington, +Tacoma, May 18; and British Columbia, Indian Cove, May 29.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival in the fall are; British +Columbia, Nootka Sound, July 23, Tahsis Canal, July 26, and Okanagan +Landing, July 28; Washington, The Olympiades, July 16; California, +Alameda, July 8, and Santa Barbara, July 12; Lower California, +Santa Rosalia Bay, August 16, and San Jose del Cabo, +August 23; Saskatchewan, Big Stick Lake, July 19, and Cochrane +River, July 23; Manitoba, Red Deer River, July 22, Lake Winnipegosis, +July 22, and Oak Lake, July 28; North Dakota, Kenmare, +July 18; South Dakota, Forestburg, July 27, Nebraska, Lincoln, +August 9; Texas, Tivoli, September 2; Minnesota, Minneapolis, +July 17; Iowa, Sioux City, August 5, and Marshalltown, August 10; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_228">[Pg 228]</span>Ontario, Toronto, July 22, Coldstream, July 29, and Brighton, July +31; Michigan, Charity Island, July 25, Jackson, July 25, and Detroit, +July 31; Ohio, Bay Point, July 3, Oberlin, July 6, Cedar Point, July +8, and Lakeside, July 17; Indiana, Bass Lake, August 1; Illinois, +Chicago, July 22, and La Grange, August 7; Missouri, St. Louis, +August 20; Mississippi, Beauvoir, July 22; Louisiana, Bayou Chene, +August 29; Maine, Portland, July 18, and Squirrel Island, July 31; +Massachusetts, Lynn, July 18; Marthas Vineyard, July 20, and Harvard, +July 26; Rhode Island, South Auburn, July 23, and Block +Island, July 25; Connecticut, New Haven, July 30; New York, Long +Beach, July 3, Orient, July 6, and Brockport, July 28; New Jersey, +Long Beach, July 19, Brigantine Beach, July 25, and Elizabeth, +July 31; North Carolina, Myrtle Sound, July 10; South Carolina, +Frogmore, July 20, and Charleston, July 21; Florida, Palma Sola, +July 10, Daytona Beach, July 19, and Pensacola, July 26; Bermuda, +August 12; the Bahama Islands, Long Island, July 17; Cuba, Batabono, +August 26; Lesser Antilles, Grenada, August 24, and Dominica, +August 29; Panama, Toro Point, July 23; Brazil, Santa Catarina, +August 4; and Colombia, Santa Marta region, September 13.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: British Columbia, Chilliwack, +August 23, Atlin, August 24, and Okanagan Landing, September +3; Mackenzie, Fort Simpson, September 1, and Fort Resolution, +September 1; Saskatchewan, Indian Head, September 2; Manitoba, +Shoal Lake, September 14, Aweme, September 14, and Oak Lake, +September 20; Nebraska, Lincoln, October 14; Minnesota, Lanesboro, +September 15; Iowa, Emmetsburg, September 24, and Grinnell, +October 22; Ontario, Toronto, October 26, and Point Pelee, October +29; Michigan, Portage Lake, October 25, and Detroit, October 29; +Ohio, Oberlin, October 21, and Youngstown, November 2; Indiana, +Hobart, September 24, and Peru, October 2; Illinois, Rantoul, October +15, and Chicago, October 28; Kentucky, Lexington, September +17; Missouri, St. Louis, September 25; Prince Edward Island, North +River, October 27; Nova Scotia, Wolfville, October 22; New Brunswick, +Scotch Lake, September 23; Quebec, Montreal, October 20; +Maine, Lewiston, October 13; Massachusetts, Lynn, October 12, Cambridge, +October 26, and Dennis, October 27; Connecticut, Fairfield, +October 22, Norwalk, October 26, and New Haven, October 31; New +York, East Hampton, October 22, Port Chester, October 25, and +Long Beach, October 28; New Jersey, Sandy Hook, October 25; and +Pennsylvania, Erie, November 2.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The semipalmated plover is more or less rare in +the southern Rocky Mountain region where records are so few that +it can be considered only as casual. Among these records are: Utah, +Salt Lake City (reported by Nelson); Colorado, Denver, April 27, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_229">[Pg 229]</span>1907, Loveland, May 6, 1890, and Grand Lake, Middle Park (Carter +Collection); and Arizona, Fort Verde, September 8, 1884, Colorado +River, September and October, 1865 (Coues), and Tucson, April, +1883 (Scott).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Labrador and Ungava: 42 records, June 7 to July 7; +21 records, June 18 to July 1. Quebec to Nova Scotia: 33 records, +June 5 to 29; 17 records, June 15 to 23. Arctic coast of Canada: 18 +records, June 16 to July 20; 9 records, June 23 to July 4. Alaska +and British Columbia; 19 records, May 27 to July 6; 10 records, +June 1 to 9.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Ringed"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">CHARADRIUS HIATICULA</span> <span class="smaller">Linnaeus</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">RINGED PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The ringed plover breeds both on the east and west coasts of +Greenland, ranging north to Sabine and Clavering Islands and +Denmark Harbor on the east side and to Inglefield Gulf on the west. +It is also said to breed near Cumberland Sound in Baffin Land, but +this may refer to the semipalmated plover, <i>Charadrius semipalmatus</i>, +and it has occurred casually in Barbados, Chile, and southern Alaska.</p> + +<p>The subdivision of the ringed plover into geographical races is +attended with considerable difficulties owing to the presence of passing +migrants on many of its breeding grounds. The Siberian form, +<i>Charadrius hiaticula tundrae</i> is generally recognized, but is only distinguishable +with certainty in summer plumage. Probably the +Alaskan specimen belongs to this race. E. Lehn Schiöler, with fine +series of carefully sexed birds before him, separates the Greenland +breeding birds from the typical race under the name of <i>Ch. hiaticula +septentrionalis</i>, but material with accurate data is too scarce in +other collections to enable us to hazard an opinion.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—In northeast Greenland, where Manniche found this +species breeding plentifully, the birds arrived about the end of May +or the beginning of June, at the same time as the other waders. +Icelandic birds arrive early: April 22 to 28 (Faber).</p> + +<p>Dr. W. Elmer Ekblaw says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The ringed plover is one of the most noticeable birds of the shorelands of +northwest Greenland. Few beaches are unoccupied by these noisy little birds, +and rarely is one out of sound of their shrill piping. They are quite as common +about the streams and pools of the interior and along the seepage swales of +the ground moraines. They come to the land as early as May 29 and stay +until the last week in July. Almost invariably they are mated when they +arrive and only rarely does one see more than a pair together, except where +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_230">[Pg 230]</span>they congregate about swales or shallow pools to feed. They are sociably inclined +and do not hesitate to make their nests near the Eskimo villages, +probably feeling more secure from Arctic foxes when near dogs and human +habitation.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—The courtship of this species has been well described +by Farren, Selous, and Stanford. The former (1910) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Ringed plovers may be seen in pairs skimming low over the ground, circling +to a far height and descending again like a flash, almost touching the ground +as they do so. They do not follow each other, but each describes similar evolutions, +overlapping and crossing the other’s line of flight. Their long pointed +wings, showing much white, give a fictitious impression of size and as they +alight on the ground after skimming a short distance with curved drooping +wings they seem suddenly to vanish from sight as they touch ground; in +place of the long-winged graceful flyer is a little plump-shaped gray bird, very +difficult to see as it runs with short quick steps over the sand.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Edmund Selous (1901) also describes a male as advancing toward +the hen a few steps at a time, and moving his legs with a rapid +vibratory motion during the pauses. Stanford (1927) remarks that +the courtship is by no means easy to observe even with the aid of a +powerful glass.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In one party on the beach on March 20, where at least two males were contending +for one female, the males ran backward and forward with short, quick +steps, and when another male was near the feathers of the back and the tips of +the closed wings were elevated, the tall depressed and spread out to its full +extent to show the white tips of the feathers, and the whole body arched +with the head and neck drawn in, the black gorget being puffed out to nearly +twice its normal size. In this crouching attitude the males ran aimlessly to +and fro for half an hour at a time, but making no real attempt to attack +each other.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Another male—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>kept running in front of the hen and sinking down on the beach every few yards +exactly as if settling down on a nest. Occasionally while brooding in this +way he would tilt himself forward onto his breast with the closed wing tips +pointing up almost vertically over his back, the tail depressed, and the legs +scratching out sand and stones behind him. The indifference displayed by the +hen to this performance was as noticeable as it usually is in the case of +lapwings’ “rolling” on the ground. On several other occasions in April I saw +cock ringed plovers settle down and appear to brood for several minutes +exactly as if they were on a nest; in one case the bird kept turning round and +round on one spot, and twice at least this action was followed by an attempt +at coition.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The love flight often covers nearly a mile of ground, and both +birds take part—crossing and recrossing with their bodies twisting +from side to side and soft beats of the wings. The double note, +according to Stanford, has a remarkably vibrant quality at these +times and the throat appears to be swelled out.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Both nesting sites and the nests themselves of this +species vary considerably. The commonest site is among the sand +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_231">[Pg 231]</span>and shingle above high-water mark on the seashore. In some +cases the eggs are laid in a hollow scratched in the sand with no +lining of any kind, in others small fragments of cockle shells and +small stones are collected and imbedded, while other nests are more +or less substantially built, from a few dead bents carelessly arranged +to well-made cups in which almost any material available is utilized, +such as driftwood, rabbits’ droppings, stems of leaves, and shore +plants, etc. On some beaches where there is no sand the eggs may +be found lying on the bare pebbles, while on the north Norfolk coast +they are often placed under shelter of sea heath, and nests have been +met with in cornfields, several miles from the sea, or on open grassland +in sewage farms inland.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—Normally four in number, occasionally three on late layings, +while instances of five are rare. In color they vary from stone +color to ocherous or clay yellow sometimes with a warm tinge, +spotted as a rule rather sparingly with brownish black. Occasionally +varieties with large blotches of sepia are met with and white +eggs have been recorded as well as bluish eggs, without markings. +The shell is deep green when viewed from within. The measurements +of 100 British eggs, made by the writer, averaged 35.9 by +25.9 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>39</b> +by 26.5, 37 by <b>28.5</b>, <b>32.2</b> by 25 and 32.7 by <b>24</b> millimeters. Eggs +from Iceland and other northern localities are decidedly smaller.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Incubation is shared by both sexes which relieve one +another at short intervals and the period is variously estimated at +from 22 to 25 days; probably 24 or 25 days represents the average. +The young are hatched within 24 hours and leave the nest as soon as +the down is dry. Apparently a second brood is reared in some +cases, but many of the late nests may be second or third layings.</p> + +<p>Doctor Ekblaw writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The old birds were wildly agitated whenever I approached, and by the +customary simulation of injury attempted to lead me away from the nest. +The fledglings ran about as soon as hatched, and like all little shorebirds were +quick to respond to a warning signal and sink into pebble-like immobility. The +weather was so cold that the old birds did not leave the young, for when the +brood was separated both parents sheltered some of the little ones.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The plumages and molts are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds, edited by H. F. Witherby +(1920).</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Insects, including Coleoptera (<i>Apion</i>, <i>Aphodius</i>, <i>Haliplus</i>, +<i>Hydroporus</i>, etc.), Crustacea, especially the smaller species (Gammaridae, +Amphipoda, etc.), Mollusca, chiefly small marine univalves, +such as Littorina, Annelida (earthworms), and vegetable matter +(seeds of <i>Polygonum</i>, etc.).</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_232">[Pg 232]</span></p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—This is an attractive and inoffensive species, sociable +in its habits and met with in flocks of considerable size out of the +breeding season, when their simultaneous maneuvers on the wing +are a very characteristic feature of the great estuaries, the flocks +appearing to change from light to dark as the upper or under surfaces +are exposed. They may also be seen on the mud flats, making +short runs at intervals, when the movements of the legs and feet +are so rapid that the eye can not follow them.</p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—John T. Nichols contributes the following:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A rather clear, not very loud, low-pitched whistle, given on the ground as +much as in the air, rather infrequent. This may be written <i>kruip</i> or <i>puik</i>, +occasionally distinctly two syllabled and suggesting the semipalmated plover’s +call, but lower pitched. It was heard in late September from several birds +loosely associated with a larger number of scattered dunlin on tidal sands north +of Liverpool. They usually took wing in silence, and the species seems to be +a rather silent one as seen here and elsewhere on British shores in September. +They were very likely not traveling, and their voice therefore not comparable +with that of the semipalmated on home shores. Also the note described is +very likely not analogous with the full, loud-flight note of the transient semipalmated +plover.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—During the autumn and winter months the flocks are +occasionally harried by a migrating merlin (<i>Falco columbarius +aesalon</i>), and some clutches of eggs are annually destroyed by +marauding Corvidae (crows) and Laridae (gulls). On some parts +of the coast which are much exposed, great damage is done by exceptionally +high tides, as many nests are built close to the high-water +mark.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—In Greenland Manniche (1910) observed that the old birds +left in pairs about the first week in August, as soon as the young were +grown up. The young birds immediately went to the shores and +estuaries, consorting with young sanderlings and turnstones and +leaving for the south early in September. At the Westmann Isles +in south Iceland they leave between September 20 and October 10.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—In the British Isles the wintering birds are to be met +with in flocks on most of our larger estuaries. When on the wing +they sometimes associate with dunlin and also occasionally with +redshanks.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—In the Old World, commonly in the British +Isles and sparingly in the Faroes and Iceland; also probably on +Bear Island and a few pairs in Spitsbergen as well as on Waigatz, +Kolguev, and Nova Zembla. On the European Continent, from +the Arctic Ocean south to the Mediterranean, chiefly on the seacoasts, +and only locally by lakes and rivers. In the Mediterranean +it is local on some of the islands and nowhere plentiful. The north +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_233">[Pg 233]</span>Asiatic race has been separated, while in the New World its breeding +range includes both coasts of Greenland and perhaps the east coast +of Baffin Land, unless the last statement is due to confusion with the +semipalmated plover.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—Many remain in the British Isles through the +winter, but birds from northern Europe migrate to the Mediterranean +region and Africa, where they have been recorded as far +south as Cape Province and Natal, the majority wintering south of +the Sahara. The Atlantic Isles (Canaries, Madeira, and Azores) +are visited on passage, and Asiatic birds have been recorded from +the Indo-Malayan archipelago and even Australia, though some +doubt has been cast on this.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—The principal passage at Gibraltar takes place +in March, the latest birds leaving in April. From about mid March +to mid April old birds are on passage northward and the breeding +ground in Norway is reached in April, and in Sweden from late +March onward.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—In northern Europe (Norway and Sweden) the +southward movement takes place in September and at the Straits +of Gibraltar the passage lasts from September to November. At +Heligoland young birds begin to pass as early as the end of June +and the beginning of July.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—In Jan Mayen it apparently occurs in some numbers, +but is not known to breed. Barbados, one, Chancery Lane, +September 10. Gould’s record of one from Port Stevens, Australia, +is a somewhat questionable one. One obtained at Sultanpur, south +of Delhi, November, 1878; another at Gilgit, October, 1879. (These +records must refer to the Siberian race, as also probably the Chilean +occurrence and that from Sitka, Alaska.)</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—In northeast Greenland Manniche found eggs from +June 17 to July 18, while in Nova Zembla the young were recently +hatched at the beginning of August and eggs probably laid late in +June or early in July. In the British Isles eggs have been met with +in March, but most eggs are laid from the end of April onward. +April 16 to 30 (5 dates), May 1 to 14 (10 dates), May 15 to 31 (21 +dates), June 1 to 30 (23 dates), July 1 to 30 (7 dates).</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Little"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">CHARADRIUS DUBIUS CURONICUS</span> <span class="smaller">Gmelin</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">LITTLE RINGED PLOVER</span></p> +<p><i>Contributed by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The little ringed plover owes its place in the American list to a +casual occurrence at Kodiak Island, Alaska. It is noteworthy that +in J. F. von Brandt’s paper in the Journal für Ornithologie, 1891, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_234">[Pg 234]</span>the Alaskan specimen is recorded as “<i>Charadrius alexandrinus</i> +Pall.” There is also a specimen in the United States National +Museum (<abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 39523) which is said to have been taken at San Francisco, +but some doubt appertains to the latter record.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The range of this species does not extend far to the +north in western Europe and it is only a rare straggler to the British +Isles. In northern Germany it appears in fair numbers on the +larger rivers and at lakesides, about the middle of March, but except +in southern Sweden few cross the Baltic to breed.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—H. F. Witherby (1919) has some interesting notes +on this species which was breeding in company with the Kentish +plover (<i>Charadrius alexandrinus</i>) near Dunkerque, in northern +France.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On April 28 the little ringed plovers were flying round after each other, +with a beautiful slow, long, flap of the wings, much like the flight of a large +butterfly and uttering a pleasing little song. This was evidently a “courtship” +action and we found many “scoops” in the sand, but no eggs.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Liebe describes the song flight as beginning with a zigzag oblique +ascent, followed by short horizontal flights at various angles over +the gravelly bed where the hen is sitting, uttering meantime his musical +whistle, which is answered by the bird beneath, and ending in a +sharp descent in a curve toward the water’s edge and thence with +low, skimming flight to the hen. The little ring plover is a much +more demonstrative and noisy species than the ringed plover and +when its breeding haunts are approached instead of running off +with a low whistle and then flying a short distance ahead, it flies +round and round the intruder with loud repeated whistling notes. +Naumann (1887) expresses the pairing song by the words “<i>duh, du +dull lull lullullul</i>,” taken in slow time and ending with a wonderful +trill only to be heard on the breeding ground.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Continental writers lay much stress on the fact that +this bird by preference always makes the nest in gravelly patches +rather than in sand. This is not invariably the case, as the bird +builds freely on sand banks in rivers where there is no shingle or +gravel, and at times also on dry mud. It may be found nesting far +inland, but nearly always in the neighborhood of water and shows +a decided preference for the shores of fresh-water lakes and the +larger rivers rather than the seashore.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The normal clutch is four, though three is not an uncommon +number, and generally they are readily distinguishable from +those of the other sand plovers. They are more pyriform in shape +than those of the Kentish plover, and average less in size than +either of the two other common European species. In color the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_235">[Pg 235]</span>ground color is often grayish when fresh but dries out to a yellowish +stone or pale reddish ocherous, with many fine streaks and spots +of dark brown and numerous small ashy streaks or spots. On the +whole the markings are paler and scantier than with the Kentish +plover, but in rare cases large blotches of rich brown and ash colors +are found in some sets, and others show an approach to the normal +type of Kentish plover. The eggs are laid in a mere hollow without +lining in the gravel. The measurements of 100 eggs (68 by the +writer and 32 by Rey) average 29.8 by 22.08 millimeters; the eggs +showing the four extremes measure <b>32.8</b> by 23, 30.1 by <b>23.5</b>, <b>27.3</b> +by 21.1, and 28.6 by <b>21</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Incubation is said by Naumann (1887) to be apparently +performed by both sexes, but in warm and sunny weather the eggs +are left for long periods uncovered. The period is over 22 days, +probably 23 or 24 (not 16 or 17 as erroneously given by Naumann). +Only one brood is reared in the season as a rule, but some dates are +extremely late and point to an occasional second brood.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The plumages and molts are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds, edited by H. F. Witherby +(1920).</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Definite records are scanty, but it is evident that the main +food consists of insects, including the smaller Coleoptera and their +larvae; Diptera and larvae; Neuroptera (Phryganeidae or caddis +flies and larvae). Naumann also found a small worm in one case in +the stomach.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Witherby (1919) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The little ringed plover is even more demonstrative than the Kentish and it +is shyer and more difficult to mark onto its nest or young. Both species have a +very plaintive alarm note which they utter constantly as they fly round the +intruder, but the Kentish is less fussy and less noisy than the little ringed. +When one is near the young both species go through various outcries, such as +running along the ground crouching low with head stretched out, lying on the +side with one wing up, the legs stretched out and the tail spread, or with the +breast on the ground and both wings half spread, but the performance of the +Kentish is much less abandoned than that of the little ringed.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>P. W. Munn (1921) also writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The behavior of the birds at their nest is totally different from Kentish +plovers, which are not demonstrative whilst they have eggs; but the little +ringed plover flies wildly round and round, twisting and doubling and uttering +its wild whistle, or else runs frantically about on the ground, whistling +plaintively.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—The eggs are occasionally taken by Corvidae, and the +birds themselves sometimes fall victims to Accipitres.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_236">[Pg 236]</span></p> + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—Central and southern Europe, from France, +Denmark, southern Sweden, southern Finland and 64° N. in Russia, +south to the Mediterranean and its islands and Africa north of the +Sahara. In Asia its range extends across Siberia to the Pacific and +includes also Japan. In India and the Philippines, Hainan, and +Formosa it is replaced by other subspecies. It does not breed in the +British Isles, but nests in Madeira and the Canaries.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—Winters in tropical Africa, south to the Gold +Coast, Fernando Po, the lower Niger, Lakes Rudolf, Albert and +Victoria Nyanza, and the Red Sea coast; in Asia to Arabia and India +and also to the Sunday Islands and perhaps New Guinea.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—In south Spain it arrives about mid March +and is widely distributed in April, while in the eastern Mediterranean +the passage takes place in Crete and Corfu in April. On +Heligoland it is only a rare straggler.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—The north German breeding birds leave for the +south at the end of September. Farther south the presence of immigrants +from the north among the breeding birds is seldom noted.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—In the British Isles there are about 10 well-authenticated +records; April (2), August (4), and October (1 or 2). +The supposed records from Iceland and the Faroes are not authenticated. +Gaetke only records 2 at Heligoland in 50 years.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—In northern Africa eggs have been found from March +onward; in Spain and the Balearic Isles, March 16 (1 date), April +15 to 30 (3 dates), May 1 to 14 (4 dates), 15 to 30 (3 dates); late +dates, June 12 and July 11. In France and Germany, May 3 to 17 +(7 dates), 18 to 31 (8 dates); June 1 to 15 (5 dates); late dates, +July 19 and 22.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Piping"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">CHARADRIUS MELODUS</span> <span class="smaller">Ord</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">PIPING PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Winsor Marrett Tyler</i></p> +</div> + +<p>Wilson and Audubon were familiar with the piping plover as +a common summer resident on the sandy beaches of the Atlantic +coast. Audubon found it breeding as far north as the Magdelen +Islands and wintering abundantly on the coast of Florida.</p> + +<p>During the years between the time of these early writers and the +present, the species has been subjected to many seasons of spring +and autumn shooting which, in the closing years of the nineteenth +century, brought the bird nearly to the point of extinction.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_237">[Pg 237]</span></p> + +<p>It is readily seen why persistent shooting threatened this bird’s +existence. Its breeding range on the coast extends for hundreds of +miles in a northerly and southerly direction, but owing to the bird’s +very restricted nesting site it is narrowed in many places to a strip +of beach only a few yards wide. Fortunately legislation intervened +and removed the smaller plovers from the list of game birds, so that +at the present time the piping plover is fast becoming one of our +common summer residents again.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—Compared to most of the waders, the piping plover has +a short and safe migration route. Moving along the coast where +spring is further advanced than in the interior of the country, and +having to pass over no large bodies of water on its way to its breeding +ground, the bird pushes northward early in the season, often +arriving in New England during the last days of March, the first +of the shorebirds to reach our beaches.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—In his notes A. C. Bent describes the courtship thus: +“I saw and heard the nuptial flight and song of this bird. He flew +in large circles or figure 8s low over the back beach near the marsh +for several minutes, giving constantly a peculiar twittering whistling +song.” Another entry in his notes under date, May 20, reads: “Saw +piping plover mating, two males following one female. They were +running around her in crouching attitude, with wings spread and +trailing and with tail spread in display, uttering whistling notes.”</p> + +<p>I once saw a male bird come up behind a crouching female and +stand at full height close to her with his breast feathers puffed out +and head held high, his neck stretched upward so that it was long +and slim, the bird both in posture and shape resembling an upland +plover. For a minute or two he stood thus while his feet beat a +rapid tatoo on the sand. In this attitude of display he appeared +bright colored and conspicuous in contrast to the female and the +band across his breast (complete in his case) stood out sharply defined +against the adjacent snowy feathers.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The typical nesting site of the piping plovers is the belt +of sand bordering lake or ocean well above high-water mark, where +the surface is becoming diversified and pebble strewn and wisps +of beach grass begin to grow. Here they lay their eggs, commonly +with little preparation for their reception other than a slight hollowing +of the light sand, but not infrequently they collect small stones, +bits of shell, or driftwood and line their nests with them or lay them +near by.</p> + +<p>The following quotations indicate differences in the appearance of +the nests. In a letter to Mr. Bent, Allen H. Wood describes a very +unusual nest. He says: “The nest was a hollow scooped in a mass +of sand which had been piled up to a height of nearly 10 inches. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_238">[Pg 238]</span>Whether the birds formed the pile or not, I do not, of course, know, +but a very careful examination failed to show how else the pile could +have been formed.” A. C. Bent speaks in his notes of finding at +Dartmouth, Mass., “three nests containing four eggs each, all on +a high, sandy and pebbly beach in the heart of a tern colony. The +nests were hollows in the sand, profusely lined with broken pieces +of white shell and were quite conspicuous.” E. W. Hadeler found +on the shore of Lake Erie, at Painesville, Ohio, a paved nest. He +says in his notes that there were “four eggs, almost the same color +as the ground and stones, laid in a slight depression on some very +small flat stones and around the nest were stones of all shapes and +sizes.” Philipp and Bowdish (1917) in New Brunswick “found a +small colony of breeding birds, five nests, each containing four eggs, +being located. The nests were on sandy beach, some in the open, +others among sparse clumps of beach grass. They were slight hollows +in the sand, some quite unlined, others with a well-formed rim +of bits of broken shell or slate.” In a letter to Mr. Bent, Edward R. +Ford calls attention to some birds nesting in an unusual environment. +He says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At Dune Park, Ind., the piping plover, to the number of five or six pairs, has +taken advantage of the widening of the beach (through the operations of a sand +company which has removed part of the dunes) and lays its eggs at a considerable +distance from the water’s edge. The old ridges formed by the tramway +beds, from which the rails have been, for the most part, removed; the old cinder +heaps, bits of scrap iron and other odds and ends of human labor, with here and +there patches of vetch and coarse grass, seem well suited to its requirements.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In common with some of its near relatives, the piping plover has +the habit of making additional hollows in the sand in the vicinity +of the hollow in which its eggs are laid. These hollows have been +termed cock nests and have been compared to the nests which the male +of some of the wrens builds while his mate is sitting.</p> + +<p>My notes, taken on Cape Cod in the company of Charles A. Robbins +in mid April, refer to this subject:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>After some 10 minutes, during which time the two birds stood motionless on +the sand facing the wind, they began to move about, the male taking visible +interest in the female and following her as she walked away. They came to a +place back of the beach where stones lay sparsely scattered on the dry sand and +little bunches of beach grass and patches of Hudsonia were growing. Here the +male stopped at a spot between two stones, lowered his breast to the ground and +kicked out alternately with his legs scratching the sand from beneath him. +Then moving off a little way he did the same in another spot while the female +came to the place between the stones and continued the hollowing process +which he had begun. Nearly, if not quite, in time with their rapidly moving +legs, the birds uttered a series of short, high-pitched whistles, all on the same +note, having the piping quality of their common call. When the scratching +stopped, the notes stopped.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_239">[Pg 239]</span></p> + +<p>During perhaps a quarter of an hour the birds continued to scratch and pipe +until several little hollows had been begun and abandoned. The female, however, +scratched for the most part in the hollow between the stones, digging it +out to a depth of an inch. Soon this phase of activity passed off and the birds +began to feed.</p> + +<p>During the hour the birds were under observation neither one made its +bobbing motion.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—[<span class="smcap">Author’s note</span>: Four eggs are the almost invariable rule +with the piping plover; rarely only three are laid in second sets, and +I have found one set of five. They are ovate to short ovate in shape +and have no gloss. The ground colors vary from “light buff” to +“cartridge buff” or buffy white. They are sparingly, but quite +evenly, marked with small spots, or fine dots, of blackish brown or +black, and sometimes with a few underlying spots of “pallid purplish +gray.” They are almost invisible on the sand or among small pebbles. +The measurements of 71 eggs average 31.4 by 24.2 millimeters; +the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>34.4</b> by 25.3, 31.8 by <b>26.4</b>, +<b>29.2</b> by 23.8 and 30 by <b>23</b> millimeters.]</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Gayle Pickwell (1925) describes in detail the hatching +of an egg and ascertained that the young birds may leave the nest a +few hours later. He says: “It soon refused to remain in the nest. +Finally, it left, and while it was tottering insecurely away the parent +bird came running up with little chuckles of solicitude.”</p> + +<p>Alexander G. Lawrence, of Winnipeg, Manitoba, says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Careful search of the sand spit revealed a number of small white moving +points, which later search proved to be baby piping plovers. While I was +chasing one it tripped, fell on its back, and lay as if stunned, deceiving me so +completely that I turned to get my camera to make a close-up picture of the +little fellow. No sooner had I moved away than he sprang up and ran pell-mell +over the sand, and the chase commenced again.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>C. A. Bobbins (1919) describes further the behavior of the young +birds thus:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Of course it frequently happens that there is no time for concealment. Then +the young birds attempt to escape by running, the tiny legs working with +surprising rapidity and carrying them over the ground so swiftly and smoothly +that they looked like balls of down blowing before the wind. Also, if their +escape up the beach is cut off and they continue to be closely pressed, they do +not hesitate to take to the water. Even those only a few hours out of the +shell swim well and navigate their frail craft, if not with intelligence, at least +in a direction away from the source of danger.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—[<span class="smcap">Author’s note</span>: The downy young piping plover is +sand colored above. The crown, back, wings, rump, and thighs are +variegated with “cream buff,” “cartridge buff,” and grayish white, +sprinkled or peppered with browns; on the wings the color deepens +almost to “chamois.” The forehead is buffy white; there is a more or +less distinct <span class="sansserif">V</span>-shaped mark of dark brown in the center of the crown +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_240">[Pg 240]</span>and a circle of small brownish tips around the edge of it. The wings +and thighs are marked with brown spots. A white collar encircles +the hind neck, and the entire under parts are white. The juvenal +plumage appears first on the scapulars and sides of the breast, then +on the remaining underparts, back, and crown; the last parts to +become feathered are the throat, belly, and rump; then the wing +quills appear, and lastly the tail. In fresh juvenal plumage the +feathers of the crown and mantle are “drab gray” or “smoke gray,” +broadly tipped with “pinkish buff,” giving a decidedly pinkish +tone at first; but these pink tips soon fade and wear away, leaving a +dull-gray crown and mantle, faintly mottled with pale tints of buffy +and dusky. The black bands on the forehead and neck are entirely +lacking.</p> + +<p>The first winter plumage is acquired by a limited body molt early +in the fall and by wear and fading of much of the plumage that is +retained. It is like the adult winter except for the worn and faded +edgings on what juvenal feathers are retained, mainly wing coverts +and scapulars. A partial prenuptial molt early in the spring produces +a nuptial plumage which is practically adult.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete molt in late summer and fall—August to +October—and a partial prenuptial molt in late winter and spring, +mainly in March. In winter plumage the crown and mantle are +“pale ecru drab,” without the pale edgings, with no black frontal +band, and with a restricted brownish instead of black collar. The +black frontal band and the black collar, characteristic of the nuptial +plumage, are usually acquired in March; the extent of the black +collar increases with age and the complete collar probably indicates +an old bird.]</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Arthur H. Howell (1924) says: “The food of this plover, +as indicated by the contents of four stomachs secured in Alabama, +consists principally of marine worms, fly larvae, and beetles.” E. H. +Forbush (1925) lists the following: “Insects, crustaceans, mollusks, +and other small marine animals and their eggs.”</p> + +<p>The feeding habits of the piping plover as it hunts for food along +our beaches are characteristic. In marked contrast to the nervous +haste of the sanderling and the rapid darting about with lightning-like +thrusts of the bill of the smallest sandpipers, the behavior of +the plover is leisurely, and as they pick up food from the sand the +movements of the head are deliberate. Three or four may sweep +down the beach together, close to the sand, but when they alight, +after a moment of stillness, they separate, each bird running a little +way, isolating itself from its companions (another point of difference +from the sanderling, etc., which in migration tend to keep close +in a flock while feeding). Generally they begin at once to hunt for +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_241">[Pg 241]</span>food. They run a short distance, then pause and stare at the sand +with neck a little outstretched, head tilted a bit to one side, perhaps +looking for a movement to show where food is, for often, leaning +farther forward, they pick something from the sand. As they run +over the beach—a run and a pause, another run and another scrutinizing +pause, often changing direction to catch up a bit of food—the +birds suggest very strongly a robin feeding on a lawn and the +resemblance is strengthened when the plover seizes a 3-inch-long +worm and drags it from beneath the sand, pulling slowly and carefully +lest it break, and swallows it whole.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Their actions while feeding are apparently identical +with those of the semipalmated plover, and the flight of the two birds +is similar if not exactly the same. Their flight is wilder than that +of the sanderling, for example, which drives steadily along; they +twist and turn more often and tilt from one side to the other, giving +the impression of extreme swiftness and agility.</p> + +<p>Descriptions of the action of the sitting bird when disturbed differ +very little. The bird is invariably wary and steals off before the +intruder comes near, leaving him in doubt as to the existence of a +nest. After the eggs are hatched, however, their actions change +completely, and the parents display the utmost concern for the safety +of their young. In the following quotation from his notes, E. H. +Forbush describes graphically this behavior, and also shows that +even in the early days of the young bird’s life the parents do not feed +them. Mr. Forbush says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A colony of piping plovers on the same beach had been much reduced in +numbers but the behavior of one pair showed that they had young on the +beach. We saw one plover and then another fluttering along the ground like +young or crippled birds. Their actions might deceive a novice, but by watching +them with a glass, we soon saw that they were adult birds. They +threw themselves on the ground, breast downward, and, drooping the flight +feathers or primaries, raised and agitated the shorter secondaries, until the +motion resembled the fluttering pinions of young or wounded birds, meantime +pushing themselves along over the sand with their feet. As the wings were +not spread, the long primary quills were not noticeable, and so the imitation of +the struggles of a helpless bird was almost perfect. Immediately we began +a careful search for the nest, looking in all the usual hiding places in or under +the tufts of beach grass, but no nest could we find. As the old birds continued +their plaintive cries and circled about, we extended our search, expecting +to find some half-grown young flattened out somewhere on the beach. +Finally, by hunting over the sand we found on the open beach, a nest exactly +like that of the least tern. A few little pebbles had been grouped in a slight +hollow, and there, partly beside and partly on the pebbles, lay three lovely +little downy chicks and one egg. We attempted to photograph the parents, but +they would not come to the young; and, as the little ones had already begun +to run, about, we sunk an old barrel in the beach, and put them and the egg +in it, that we might know where to find them on the morrow.</p> + +<p>The day was foggy and cold, and during the night a thunderstorm drenched +the earth; but the next morning the egg had disappeared, and four lively +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_242">[Pg 242]</span>youngsters were running around in our barrel. They were now so active, that +if one were liberated it would be rather difficult to catch it, while if hidden, +it would be almost impossible to find it.</p> + +<p>We kept them there two days, until we made sure that the parents never fed +them. They brooded them quite constantly, but brought no food whatever, and +we made certain that the young were able and willing to find their own food +within 24 hours after they were out of the shell. It was seen that unless +they were liberated from the barrel they would soon starve to death.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>C. A. Bobbins (1919) in a study of a colony of piping plovers +breeding in Massachusetts lays stress on the communal feeling that +he noted in the birds. He says that the feeling—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>manifests itself in a marked degree; as when, at a threat of danger, more than +two adults join in driving a single brood up the beach and into the safety which +the concealing color of the dry sand furnishes.</p> + +<p>It is shown again by the number of old birds that attempt to distract attention +from the same brood or even from a detached individual by feigning; +creeping off with wings outstretched and fluttering, tail fanned and dragging +or, if the need requires more extreme measures, collapsing utterly a short +distance away as if completely exhausted.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—The piping plover’s home is blue and gray and white; +on one side is the long line of the horizon over a large lake or the +sea, on the other the long line of the sand hills. It is a land the +same the world over, wherever the sea meets the white, shifting +sand. The sea slides back and forth over the hard smooth wet shining +beach; above the reach of the tide is the dry, pale gray, pebbly +upper beach with here and there a few strands of beach grass growing +in it, and higher up are the dunes which mark on the land side +the boundary of the plover’s home.</p> + +<p>Walk along the water’s edge and, although the sea may be pounding +on the shore and a northerly gale howling about our ears, we shall +hear the plover’s voice; a soft musical moan, we can not tell from +where, but clear and distinct above the sound of waves and wind. +The note has a ventriloquial quality and it is often our first intimation +that a piping plover is near, for the soft gray of the bird’s plumage +matches the sandy background, whereas the note is pervasive and +attracts our attention by its strangeness.</p> + +<p>Aretas A. Saunders sends me the following summary of this +plover’s notes. He says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The commonest call I have noted is the one rendered in the books as <i>peep-lo</i>. +It is lower pitched than most of the shore-bird voices, a clear melodious whistle, +and generally rendered <i>peep peep peeplo</i>. The <i>peep</i> is usually a tone or a tone +and a half higher pitched than the <i>lo</i> and I have one record where it is three +tones and a half higher. I have one or two records where the second note slurs +upward, the effect like <i>peep-loay</i> and suggesting the <i>peeawee</i> of the wood pewee. +Another sort of note I have several records of I do not find described in books. +This is a series of short sweet notes, more rapid than the others, nine or ten +notes in a series. They are either all on the same pitch, or grading slightly +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_243">[Pg 243]</span>downward in pitch toward the end, and they are sometimes followed by the +peep-lo notes, at least in flight.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>J. T. Nichols says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When nesting the piping plover is rather noisy. The thought of its plaintive, +rather mellow whistled notes, <i>queep</i>, <i>queep</i>, <i>queeplo</i>, etc., which perhaps have +an analogy with song, takes me back to the sand dunes of Cape Cod standing +in the dazzling sunshine, where I first became familiar with this species a +number of years ago. At other times of year piping plover are rather silent. +Their whistled flight note <i>hee-hu</i>, with falling inflection at the end, is not loud +or striking, and suggests that of the semipalmated plover, reversed.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Gayle Pickwell (1925) in a study of the breeding habits “on a +strip of sandy beach at Capital Lake near Lincoln” [Nebraska] says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The most interesting thing about the piping plovers was their activities +when one was near the nest. As an observer approached the nest he would be +met by one of the plovers dropping down out of nowhere, uttering its sharp <i>kee-wee, +kee-wee</i> and striving its utmost to lead one away. It would then run +briskly across the sand and disappear suddenly from sight when it stopped to +crouch down and utter its long-drawn <i>whooaah, whooaah</i>.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The variety of their cries and calls was amazing.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At almost any period, while we were in the neighborhood, one of the birds +could be observed flying here and there with slow, wide wing beats, uttering a +rapid <i>kuk, kuk, kuk, kuk</i>. It would shortly alight and wind it up with a long-drawn, +weird <i>whooaah, whooaah</i> that seemed to come from nowhere in particular. +The distress cries while one was near the nest were confined chiefly to a +sharp <i>kee-ah, kee-ah</i>. The reason for their name of “piping” became very +apparent at such times.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The <i>kuk</i> mentioned by Mr. Pickwell is seemingly analogous to a +common note which the semipalmated plovers use as they carry on +their harmless running flights along the beach—a sort of rattling +cackle of short notes somewhat suggesting the call of the red crossbill. +These utterances are evidently expressions of a heightening in the +emotional state of these closely related plovers.</p> + +<p>John A. Farley (1919) describes a mating song accompanying +courting activities. He says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I noticed a group of three, two of which chased each other around just like +two robins fighting over a female. Some flew around rather low over the +beach (some of them rather close to me), in apparent sexual excitement, and +uttered notes while on the wing. These were different from the usual mellow, +rather low notes which the birds were uttering more or less all the time while +on the sand. Their notes on the wing were higher in tone and rather long +drawn out, and mixed in with them were some little chuckles. The whole +might be described as some sort of a mating song.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—J. T. Nichols says in substance in his notes that the +bird—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>may be recognized by its exceedingly pale colors which nearly match the dry +sand of the beach above high-water mark. The white in the wing shows so +little contrast to the general tone of the plumage that, although in flight a +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_244">[Pg 244]</span>pattern on the wing is visible, it Is very faintly indicated. A flying sanderling +sometimes appears to be about the same color, but has bolder wing pattern +than the plover.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The bobbing motion characteristic of several of the plovers is a +common habit of the piping plover. This is a single hitching motion +by which the body is tilted up and down on the legs as a fulcrum. +It is apparently identical with the bob of the semipalmated plover +and is made frequently as the birds stand about on the beach.</p> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—The piping plover is shielded from its enemies by +remarkable protective coloration which renders the bird nearly invisible +as it stands motionless on the gray sand, especially when +among scattered stones. The eggs, the young, and the adult bird +are alike protected, so now that man is no longer its deadly enemy +there is little to check the species from repopulating its breeding +haunts in its former numbers.</p> + +<p>E. Beaupre speaks in his notes of a local condition in eastern +Ontario. He says: “Owing to the destructive work of crows [in +eating the plover’s eggs] some are obliged to lay a second clutch, +and this no doubt accounts for some of the nests containing fresh +eggs in June.”</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The piping plover moves southward soon after its nesting +activities are over, following the habit of its relatives, the Limicolae +which breed during the short summer about the Arctic Circle. Early +departure from its nesting ground is not imperative in the case of +this southerly breeding bird, but the habit is undoubtedly of long +standing and dates back to the time when the species bred close to +the edge of the glacial ice field and summer passed quickly.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—W. E. D. Scott (1892), speaking of the bird in Jamaica +on its winter quarters, says: “In October, 1887, piping plover were +abundant among the lagoons and mangrove swamps at the Palisades; +they moved about in large flocks which, when once alighted on the +shell-bestrewn beaches, it was impossible to detect.”</p> + +<p>We leave the little plover covered by the helmet of invisibility.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Eastern North America and the West Indies.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The breeding range of the piping plover extends +north to Saskatchewan (Big Stick Lake and Quill Lake); Manitoba +(Birch Island in Lake Manitoba and Lake Winnipeg); Michigan +(Big Beaver Island and Charity Island); Ontario (Toronto +and Brighton); Quebec (probably Natashquan); and probably Newfoundland +(Stephenville Crossing, St. George Bay). East to probably +Newfoundland (Stephenville); the Magdalen Islands; Prince +Edward Island (North River); Nova Scotia (Sable Island and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_245">[Pg 245]</span>Yarmouth); Massachusetts (Ipswich, Monomoy Island, and Marthas +Vineyard); New York (Gardiners Island and Shelter Island); +New Jersey (Barnegat Inlet, Beach Haven, Sea Isle City, and +probably Cape May); Maryland (probably Ocean City); Virginia +(Chincoteague Island, Cobb Island, and Cape Charles); and North +Carolina (Pea Island and Beaufort). South to North Carolina +(Beaufort); northern Pennsylvania (Erie); northern Ohio (Painesville, +Cleveland, Oberlin, and Sandusky); northern Indiana (Millers); +northern Illinois (Waukegan); southern Wisconsin (Milwaukee +and Lake Koshkonong); and Nebraska (Lincoln, Dannebrog, +and Doss). West to Nebraska (Goss); South Dakota (Miner +County); North Dakota (Stump Lake, Minnewauken, and Kenmare); +and southern Saskatchewan (Big Stick Lake).</p> + +<p>There are many gaps in the range above outlined and the species +also has been extirpated from parts of its breeding grounds.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—Almost entirely the South Atlantic and Gulf coasts +of the United States. North to southern Texas (Padre Island, +Aransas River and High Island); Louisiana (Vermilion Bay); +Alabama (Petit Bois Island and Dauphin Island); and Georgia +(Savannah). East to Georgia (Savannah and Darien); eastern +Florida (Amelia Island, Mayport, St. Augustine, Sebastian, and +Miami); probably the Bahama Islands (Eleuthera and Great Inagua); +and probably rarely Porto Rico. South to probably rarely +Port Rico; Cuba (Matanzas and Habana); southern and western +Florida (Cape Sable, Key West, Sanibel Island, Fort Myers; mouth +of the Withlacoochee River, and probably Pensacola); and southern +Texas (Padre Island). West to southern Texas (Padre Island). +The species has been detected in winter occasionally in Bermuda.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: South Carolina, +Frogmore, March 20; North Carolina, Pea Island, April 7; +District of Columbia, Washington, March 25; Pennsylvania, Erie, +April 16; New York, Shinnecock, March 24, Montauk Point, April 1, +and Gardiners Island, April 7; Rhode Island, Newport, March 24; +Massachusetts, Marthas Vineyard, March 18, Dennis, March 24, and +Nantucket, March 26; Nova Scotia, April 24; Illinois, Colona, April +9, and De Kalb, April 18; Indiana, Waterloo, April 14, and Frankfort, +April 15; Ohio, Lakeside, April 7, and Oberlin, April 15; Michigan, +Port Sanilac, April 15, Ottawa Beach, April 23, and Detroit, +April 26; Ontario, Point Pelee, April 10, Listowel, May 1, and Toronto, +May 8; Iowa, German Center, April 10; Wisconsin, Whitewater, +April 29, and Elkhorn, May 13; Minnesota, Waseca, May 11, and +Heron Lake, May 11; Kansas, Lawrence, April 27, McPherson, May +3, and Topeka, May 7; Nebraska, Lincoln, April 26, Gibbon, May 4, +Nebraska City, May 8, and Doss, May 11; South Dakota, Sioux Falls, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_246">[Pg 246]</span>May 5, and Vermilion, May 8; North Dakota, Harrisburg, May 23, +and St. Thomas, May 29; Manitoba, Shoal Lake, May 15, and Killarney, +May 25; and Saskatchewan, Indian Head, May 14, Qu’Appelle, +May 23, and Lake Johnston, May 23.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are: Florida, Amelia Island, April +20, Daytona Beach, May 1, and Peninsula Point, May 11; and South +Carolina, Sullivans Island, May 11, and Mount Pleasant, May 18.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival in the fall are: Texas, +Rockport, August 12, and St. Joseph Island, August 14; Mississippi, +Bay St. Louis, August 29; South Carolina, Mount Pleasant, August +2; Florida, New Smyrna, July 15, Fernandina, August 3, and Daytona, +August 10; and Alabama, Dauphin Island, August 16.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Manitoba, Shoal Lake, September +7; South Dakota, Forestburg, September 24; Nebraska, Bellwood, +September 19, and Doss, September 24; Iowa, Grinnell, October +28; Ontario, Point Pelee, September 22; Michigan, Newbury, +September 18; Ohio, Cleveland, September 24, Painesville, September +26, and Port Clinton, September 28; Indiana, La Fayette, +September 18; Prince Edward Island, North River, October 20; +Nova Scotia, Pictou, October 8; Vermont, Bennington, October 2; +Massachusetts, Lynn, October 3, Dennis, October 12, and Boston, +October 26; Rhode Island, Block Island, October 24; New York, +Fair Haven Light, September 28, and Long Beach, November 7 +(exceptionally late date); New Jersey, Cape May, September 13; +and Pennsylvania, Erie, September 26.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The piping plover has been detected outside of +its regular range on very few occasions. A specimen in the British +Museum from the Lake of the Woods, Ontario, may indicate breeding +in that locality. One was obtained at Cheyenne, Wyo., on May +30, 1892.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Quebec and New Brunswick: 55 records, June 1 to +29; 28 records, June 5 to 18. New England to New Jersey: 48 +records, May 22 to June 29; 24 records, May 28 to June 23. Dakotas: +13 records, May 26 to July 1; 7 records, May 28 to June 6.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Snowy"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">CHARADRIUS NIVOSUS NIVOSUS</span> <span class="smaller">(Cassin)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">SNOWY PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The charming little snowy plover of the Pacific coast is the counterpart +of our familiar piping plover, found in similar haunts, perhaps +even tamer and more confiding, but not equal to our eastern +bird in melody of voice. It is a child of the sand, with which its +colors blend so well that when crouched in some hollow or against +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_247">[Pg 247]</span>some bleached piece of driftwood or half buried clam shell it seems +to be just one more of the numerous, inconspicuous objects which one +passes unnoticed on the beach. Its favorite haunts are the broad +expanses of flat, dry sand above the ordinary wash of the tides on +ocean beaches. Such places are usually strewn more or less thickly +with shells, pebbles, and various bits of débris, among which the +little plover, or its eggs and young, are surprisingly inconspicuous. +Here it was born and has always lived; here it woos its mate and +rears its little family; and hence it seldom strays except to feed +along the water’s edge on the ocean beach or on the bare flats along +some near-by tidal creek. There are, however, a few places in the +interior where the snowy plover has been found along the shores of +salt or alkaline lakes. But it is mainly a bird of the ocean beaches.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The snowy plover wanders north in the spring as far as +the coast of Washington. D. E. Brown tells me that he saw it in +Grays Harbor County from April 7 to 13, 1918, and from May 14 +to 16, 1914, in Pacific County. But apparently no one has ever found +it breeding there, although several good observers have looked for it.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The nesting grounds of the snowy plover have been +briefly described above, but a better description is contained in the +following quotation from W. Lee Chambers (1904):</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The nesting ground is a white sandy cape or narrow strip of land between +Ballona Swamp and the ocean about 2 miles long and 200 yards wide. This +place during the fall high tides is completely flooded and deposits of small +rocks and broken shells are left there. Among these the plovers place their +nests. On approaching it one may be attracted by noticing the little fellows +running about on the sand in front of him or occasionally flying in low, wide +circles uttering a pleading whistle so characteristic of this species. This +whistle I have learned is a danger signal that I am near their nests, and on +looking over the ground carefully I may be able to notice fine bird tracks in +the white sand or in the patches of white sand between the shells and rocks.</p> + +<p>In going over the ground carefully where the tracks are the thickest a nest +will generally be found. Sometimes the birds will build among the small rocks, +where the tracks can not be seen, and here the eggs are safe, as their coloration +protects them, for they look exactly like small rocks. The nests are, as a rule, +found by a mark of some kind, a bone of some animal, a small dead weed, or a +bit of driftwood, and are slight depressions in the sand. Some are completely +lined with broken shells or fish bones with the eggs pointed toward the center, +very close together and about half buried in the nest lining. A pair of birds +will build several nests during the season and use only one, for I have found +nests all fixed up and completely surrounded with tracks. This I noticed +especially in 1901, for I found about three times as many unused nests as used +ones. During this season I visited Ballona about three times a week and gave +the birds careful study.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>While J. Eugene Law was helping me to get acquainted with the +birds of southern California, we spent a delightful day, May 29, 1914, +among these birds with Mr. Chambers at Del Rey, Los Angeles +County. This was once a typical nesting place of this species, a broad +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_248">[Pg 248]</span>stretch of sand flats above an ocean beach, backed by sand dunes and +bordered on the inner side by a sluggish stream meandering through +a marsh and some brackish lagoons. But civilization was encroaching +on the plover’s paradise, for several cottages had been built on +the beach and it was much frequented. Some four pairs of snowy +plover still clung to their ancestral home; we found three nests with +three eggs each and one empty nest, in open spaces among the houses. +The nests were mostly on little mounds of sand and scattered pebbles +or among low sand dunes covered with low weeds and vines. They +were deep hollows in the sand, profusely lined with finely broken +white and pink shells, among scattered small stones, bits of wood, or +other rubbish. Amid such surroundings the eggs were not easily +detected; but we could usually locate the nests by the multitude of +little footprints in the sand converging toward the nest. All but +one of the birds were shy and sneaked off the nests before we drew +near. They watched us from a distance, running about very swiftly, +whistling their soft, plaintive notes of protest. One bird was very +tame; I gradually walked up very close to her and finally photographed +her within 3 or 4 feet. This gentle and confiding little bird, +after running about with drooping wings and spread tail, came +slowly up to the nest and settled down on the eggs right in front of +me, spreading out her plumage to cover her treasures. As a reward +for her bravery we did not disturb her further.</p> + +<p>Grinnell, Bryant, and Storer (1918) write that:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In the vicinity of the salt works near Alvarado, on the Alameda County shore +of San Francisco Bay, L. R. Reynolds found that a great many pairs had in the +summer of 1914 selected nesting sites on the dike separating the salt ponds. +The workmen, in traversing the dikes with wheelbarrows, reported having +broken many eggs.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The snowy plover ordinarily lays three eggs, but often +only two. Mr. Chambers (1904) says that out of 44 sets which he +collected 11 were of two eggs and 33 were of three. The two egg sets +were complete, as he left them long enough to make sure. The eggs +were laid about three days apart. The extended nesting season, +April to July, would seem to indicate that two broods are raised, but +I believe that this has not been positively proven. The eggs are short, +ovate in shape, and without gloss. They are colored to match the +sand—“olive buff” to “pale olive buff,” or “cartridge buff.” They +are more or less evenly but not thickly covered with small spots, +dots, or little scrawls of black and a few small inconspicuous spots +of “pallid mouse gray.” The measurements of 51 eggs average 30.4 +by 22.3 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>32.5</b> +by 23.5, 30 by <b>24</b>, and <b>28</b> by <b>20.5</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Apparently both sexes share the duties of incubation and +care of the young, at which they prove devoted parents. When the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_249">[Pg 249]</span>young are approached the parents use all the artifices known to similar +species to distract the attention of the intruder, fluttering along +as if both wings and legs were helpless, or grovelling in the sand as +if wounded. Such tactics often succeed in fooling a dog and enticing +him far enough away but to human beings they are only an incentive +to look carefully for the tiny balls of down that, obedient to their +parents’ note of warning, are crouched immovable and well-nigh +invisible in some little hollow in the sand or under or against some +object on the beach. And there the little one remains “frozen” until +touched or until sure that he is observed; when, presto, off he goes, +running at a marvelous pace on his strong little legs. We watch +him for some time as he scampers away for a long distance until +suddenly he vanishes; then, unless we have marked him down +exactly and kept our eyes on the spot, we had better give up hope of +finding him again.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The downy young snowy plover is quite unlike the +young piping plover. The entire upper parts are pale buff, “cream +buff” to “cartridge buff,” mixed with grayish white. The crown, +back, rump, wings, and thighs are distinctly and quite evenly spotted +with black. The under parts are pure white.</p> + +<p>In the juvenal plumage the crown, mantle, rump, cheeks, and a +space in front of the wing are “drab,” or “light drab,” with a +pinkish buff tinge on the tips of the feathers; the forehead and all +under parts are white. The first winter plumage is similar, without +the buffy edgings.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete postnuptial molt in late summer and fall, +and a partial prenuptial molt in early spring. Males in nuptial +plumage have the crown and nape “pinkish buff,” and a broad band +above the forehead, an auricular patch and a patch in front of the +wing abruptly clear black. In females the crown is pale drab, like +the back, and the dark markings are more restricted and more +brownish. In winter the sexes are alike, similar to the spring +female, but the dark markings are even duller, about the same tone +as the back.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Snowy plover feed mainly on the sandy beaches, foraging +on the wet sand and at the surf line, where they are expert at +dodging the incoming waves and very lively, running up and down +the beach as the waves advance or recede. Here they often forage in +compact bunches, picking up small crustaceans, marine worms, or +other minute marine organisms. Inland they feed along the muddy +or alkaline shores of ponds or lakes, on various insects, such as beetles +or flies. Dr. A. K. Fisher (1893) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This handsome little plover was observed by the writer on the shores of +Owens Lake, near Keeler, May 30 to June 4, where it was common in small +flocks of 5 or 10 on the alkaline flats which border the lake. Like most +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_250">[Pg 250]</span>other birds in the vicinity, it fed extensively, if not exclusively, on a species +of small fly (<i>Ephydra hians</i> Say), which was found in immense masses near +the edge of the lake. Many of these swarms of flies were four or five layers +deep and covered an area of 15 or 20 square feet. Some idea can be formed +of the inexhaustible supply of food which this insect furnishes for birds +when it is known that colonies of equal size occurred at close intervals in +suitable localities all around the lake, which has a shore line of between 40 and +50 miles.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Grinnell, Bryant, and Storer (1918) write:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When searching for food they move about a great deal, with a distinct trot, +and on occasion have been seen to hop along on one leg as Torrey has observed +sanderlings to do at Santa Barbara. Their movements are rapid and their +strides exceedingly long. At Netarts Bay, Oreg., Jewett says that when running +fast the strides of one of these birds proved to measure 6 inches. One +of the birds will start, run 3 or 4 feet, and stop suddenly, the whole performance +occupying but a second or two. There is an abrupt upward tilt of the +body at intervals, and with the return movement the quavering note is often +uttered. In flight the birds may travel in open formation, or closely massed, +and the flight may be either direct, or in zigzag course as with the small +sandpipers. Both in flight, and on the ground, their chunky appearance helps +to distinguish them from the small sandpipers. They are quite tame and will +usually permit a close approach, preferring apparently to trot along in front +of the observer, or off to one side, rather than to take wing.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Florence Merriam Bailey (1916) observes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Besides the large waders, the godwits, willets, and surf birds, there were +flocks of little sanderlings and snowy plover, looking like small chickens on the +beach among the bigger birds. The snowy plover, plump, squat little fellows +with head markings that suggest wide foreheads and backs that match the +sand on which they love to sun themselves, when feeding on the beach would +hurry back ahead of the foam, their short legs making them more in danger +of getting wet than the long-legged godwits. When resting, the plump little +sandy-backed fellows kept by themselves. Sometimes as I walked along above +the line of the tide, bits of sand would take legs ahead of me, the brown forms +that squatted in my path having been entirely overlooked. When I saw them +before they got up, and stopped to talk to them, the confiding little fellows +flatteringly sat still or went on fixing their feathers, looking very comfortable +in the warm sand. To me they seemed the most winning and attractive of all +the lovely little sandpipers. When they were surprised and ran from me they +did it in a comical crouching way as if knowing their backs were sand color and +trying to hide their black legs and plump white bodies. Their habit of bobbing +the head is doubtless useful at times, but the motion often catches the eye when +without it they would not be separated from the sand.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—Grinnell, Bryant, and Storer (1918) say: “Snowy plover +are exceptionally quiet birds; but at times a low, guttural, trilling +note, <i>cr-r-r-r</i> or <i>pe-e-e-et</i>, may be given, and when the vicinity of the +nest is invaded the birds give utterance to relatively loud cries.”</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—They also give the best recognition marks, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The snowy plover is readily distinguished from most other shore birds occurring +in California by its very small size (total length, 6–7 inches). It is but +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_251">[Pg 251]</span>slightly larger than our smallest shore bird, the least sandpiper. The chunky +appearance, short, thick bill (which is shorter than the head), white collar +around hind neck, uniform pale drab upper surface, pure white under surface, +and conspicuous dark-brown or black patches at the sides of the breast are all +useful as aids to recognition. From the killdeer, and the semipalmated and +Wilson plovers, the snowy is distinguished by its lack of complete black or +dark-brown breast band and by its smaller size, and from the least and western +sandpipers, and from the sanderling, by its white collar around hind neck and +by the dark patches at the sides of its chest; and, in spring, from the last three +named birds by the absence of mixed coloration on its upper surface.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—The snowy plover is a permanent resident throughout +the southern part of its range, though perhaps the same individuals +may not be present all the year round. It winters as far north as +San Francisco, but more abundantly from Santa Barbara southward, +where its numbers are increased in winter by migrants from farther +north and where flocks of 50 or more are often seen.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—The United States (principally the western part), the +West Indies, and Central and South America.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The snowy plover breeds north probably to +Washington (Willapa Harbor); Utah (Bear River and Farmington); +southern Kansas (Comanche County); Oklahoma (Cimarron +River); Mississippi (Horn Island); Florida (Pensacola, and Santa +Rosa Island); and Cuba (rarely Guantanamo). East to Cuba +(rarely Guantanamo). South to Cuba (rarely Guantanamo); southern +Texas (Refugio County, probably San Patricio County, and +Corpus Christi); probably New Mexico (Carlsbad); and Lower California +(La Paz). West to Lower California (La Paz, probably +Santa Rosalia Bay, and probably San Quentin Bay); California +(San Diego, probably San Nicholas Island, probably San Miguel +Island, Santa Barbara, Morro, Monterey, Santa Cruz, Pescadero, +San Francisco, and Eureka); probably Oregon (Netarts Bay); and +probably Washington (Willapa Harbor).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range extends north to California +(Santa Cruz Islands); Texas (Brownsville, Corpus Christi, and +Aransas Bay); probably coastal regions of Louisiana; Florida (Pensacola, +Santa Rosa Island, Cedar Keys, Clearwater, and Fort Myers); +Bahama Islands (Riley); probably Cuba (Gundlach); probably +Yucatan; and Chile (Calbuco). South to Chile (Calbuco). West +to Chile (Calbuco, and probably Valparaiso); Peru (Chorillos, and +the valley of the Tambo); probably Guatemala (Chiapam); Lower +California (La Paz, Magdalena Islands, and San Cristobal Bay); +and California (San Diego, Santa Cruz Island, Santa Barbara, and +Monterey Bay). They also were noted at Westport, Wash., on +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_252">[Pg 252]</span>December 19, 1927 (letter, J. H. Bowles), and so may winter rarely +in that region.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—But little information is available concerning +the migration of the snowy plover. Early dates of spring arrival +are: Kansas, McPherson, April 14, and Douglas County, April 22; +Utah, Salt Lake County, May 3; Oregon, Corvallis, March 24, and +Malheur Lake, April 20; and Washington, Grays Harbor, April 7.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—The few available late dates of fall departure +are: Washington, Point Chehalis, November 18; and northern California, +San Francisco, November 1, and Alameda, December 3.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The snowy plover has been detected outside of +its normal range on a few occasions. Among these are: Brazil +(Specimen in United States National Museum); southern Chile +(Coquimbo, Straits of Magellan in June [Sharpe]); Ontario, +Toronto, one specimen in May, 1880, and another on July 6, 1897 +(Fleming); Nebraska, two specimens at Lincoln, May 17, 1903 +(Swenk); Wyoming, one taken near Cheyenne (Knight); while a +specimen from Kodiak Island, Alaska, reported by Schalow (1891) +as <i>Charadrius alexandrinus</i>, may be this species.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—California: 155 records, April 2 to July 28; 78 records, +May 5 to June 14. Utah: 5 records, April 30 to June 15.</p> + +<p>[<span class="smcap">Author’s note.</span>—The above distribution includes both North +American races. Probably the birds found breeding east of the +Rocky Mountains and wintering on eastern coasts will prove to be +referable to <i>tenuirostris</i>, but there are not enough specimens available +from these localities to outline definitely the ranges of the two races.]</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Cuban"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">CHARADRIUS NIVOSUS TENUIROSTRIS</span> <span class="smaller">(Lawrence)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">CUBAN SNOWY PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The snowy plover which breeds on the Gulf coasts of Texas, +Louisiana, and Florida, as well as in Cuba, the Bahamas, and a few +places in the interior has been separated from the Pacific coast form +under the above name. The difference between the two forms is +not easily recognized, but the eastern bird is said to be much paler +and may average a trifle smaller. The habits of the two seem to +be similar. N. S. Goss (1891) found this bird breeding on the salt +plains along the Cimarron River, Indian Territory, in 1886. Herbert +W. Brandt sent me some notes on a nest found by him in Nueces +County, Tex. Francis M. Weston writes to me that it is common +and breeds near Pensacola, Fla. He says of its notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When on the ground the Cuban snowy plover gives a low-pitched, musical +whistle, roughly indicated by the words <i>pe-wee-ah</i> or <i>o-wee-ah</i>, the accent being +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_253">[Pg 253]</span>on the second syllable with the first and third almost inaudible at a distance +of 30 feet. The flight note is a purring whistle, suggestive of the rolling note +of the Carolina wren but pitched lower and not as strident.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>It was apparently common during the winter in Pinellas County, +Fla., frequenting the sandy islands and ocean beaches in the vicinity +of Tampa Bay; but we found it difficult to separate it, in immature +and winter plumages, from young piping plover, unless we were +near enough to recognize its slender bill; the difference in size was +not noticeable except by direct comparison. I can find nothing in +its nesting habits or in its behavior in which it differs from the +Pacific snowy plover. I have not seen its eggs, but presume that they +are like those of the western form.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Mongol"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">CHARADRIUS MONGOLUS MONGOLUS</span> <span class="smaller">Pallas</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">MONGOLIAN PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>According to the Rev. F. C. R. Jourdain:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This species is now known to be divided into two fairly distinguishable +subspecies, the typical race breeding in Mongolia, Kamchatka, and Eastern +Siberia as well as on the Commander Islands, and wintering from the Philippines, +Celebes, etc., to New Guinea and Australia. It is this form which has +occurred in Alaska. <i>Charadrius mongolus atrifrons</i> Wagler, the western race, +breeds from the Kirghis Steppes in South Russia to the Himalayas and Tibet, +wintering in East Africa, Madagascar, the Seychelles, India, Malacca, and the +Great Sunda Isles.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Like several other Asiatic species, it occasionally wanders across +Bering Strait into extreme northwestern Alaska. Joseph Dixon +(1918) throws considerable doubt over the time-honored record of +specimens supposed to have been taken by Captain Moore of the +plover on the Choris Peninsula in the summer of 1849; his reasoning, +which seems to be sound, suggests that these specimens were +probably taken on the Siberian side. However, Alfred M. Bailey +(1926) collected a male of this species at Cape Prince of Wales on +June 11, 1922, of which he says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The tundra was still snow covered, only a small, sandy strip being bare along +Lopp Lagoon, and there I found this little wanderer from the Siberian shore in +company with yellow wagtails. A south wind had been blowing for a few +days previous, which changed to the north the evening before. On these changes +of winds I observed that Old World birds were likely to drift across the channel.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Harry S. Swarth has very kindly given me, in advance of publication +by the California Academy of Sciences, the latest records of +the occurrence of this species in Alaska. While collecting for the +academy on Nunivak Island, C. G. Harrold took two specimens, a +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_254">[Pg 254]</span>female on August 14 and a male on September 1, 1927. Two others +were seen on August 14, one on September 11, and one on September +13. It looks as if this might be more than a casual straggler in +Alaska.</p> + +<p>Dr. Leonhard Stejneger (1885) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The Mongolian plover is a very common resident on the Commander Islands; +in fact, one of the most characteristic birds of their fauna. It is one of the +brightest and handsomest shore birds, and is always gladly welcomed when +making its appearance during the first half of May. I used then to watch with +delight these elegant runners, wondering at the almost incredible rapidity with +which they move their legs when chasing each other over the pebbly beach, or +trying to escape the approaching hunter. Very soon, however, the pairs retire +to the place chosen for the summer home, and, as soon as the eggs are laid, +the birds become more shy and do not expose themselves as much as they did +before.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—There are three sets of eggs in the United States National +Museum taken by Doctor Stejneger in the Commander Islands +“during the first days of June.” He says that the birds “do not fly +directly from the nest but run away a distance from it before taking +wing,” which makes it difficult to find the nests. A nest he describes—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Was found on the islet Toporkof, on the 4th of June, 1883, and contained +three eggs. They were lying, with their pointed ends inwards and downwards, +in a slight hollow in the ground between the stems of four <i>Angelica archangelica</i>. +Dry particles of the leaves and stems of this plant, and numerous seeds of the +same, formed the nest, being evidently brought together by the bird itself. +The situation of the nest was about 40 feet from the line of high water and +about 14 feet above the level of the sea.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Jourdain contributes the following:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Interesting confirmation of Doctor Stejneger’s observations on the breeding +habits and eggs of this species have been furnished by the recent discovery +of the breeding haunts of the western race by Messrs. H. Whistler (1925) +and B. B. Osmaston (1927) at high altitudes in the Himalayan range. Mr. +Whistler found at least five pairs breeding on the stony wastes near the +Chandra Lake in Lahul, at 14,000 feet on July 10 to 11. Two clutches, each of +three well-incubated eggs and one brood of three downy young were taken. +Other pairs were subsequently found breeding in Spiti (13,500 ft.) and on the +northern slopes of the Bara Lacha range. Mr. B. B. Osmaston found this +species not uncommon in South and East Ladakh in summer, between 13,000 +and 15,500 feet. It was located as breeding in Rukshu near the Tsokar and Tso +Morari Lakes at about 15,000 feet and between the Indus and Shushal at +14,000 to 14,500 feet, by the Pangong Lake at 14,000 and in the upper Surun +Valley at 13,000 feet.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In every case three eggs or young were found and the nest was a slight +depression in the sand, among shingle (Osmaston, 1927), or in hollows among +the trailing stems of a small creeping ground plant with a woodlike stem, +sparingly lined with broken chips and fragments of the plant stems (Whistler +1925).</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_255">[Pg 255]</span></p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The nine eggs collected by Doctor Stejneger vary in shape +from ovate to ovate pyriform and they show no gloss. The ground +colors vary from “cinnamon buff” to “deep olive buff.” They are +quite evenly, but not heavily, marked with small spots of very dark +browns, “warm sepia” to “bone brown,” or brownish black. There is +a set of three eggs, which seems to be the usual number, in the collection +of Col. John E. Thayer, taken at Omsk, Siberia, on June 9, 1893. +These are subpyriform in shape, without gloss. The ground colors +vary from “deep olive buff” to “pale olive buff.” One egg is uniformly +covered with fine pen-like scrawls of “sepia” and “pale +violet gray.” The others are marked, chiefly in a ring near the large +end, with similar scrawls and with irregular spots of brownish black +or black. The measurements of 15 eggs average 35.2 by 26.2 millimeters; +the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>37.5</b> by 27, 32 +by <b>28.8</b> and <b>30.5</b> by <b>23.2</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p>Mr. Jourdain says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The 12 eggs taken by Osmaston (1927) averaged 36.7 by 26.3, while the 6 +obtained by Whistler (1925) averaged 38.4 by 26.5 millimeters, thus agreeing +well on the whole with those of the eastern race, but are as a rule rather +larger. The coloration is also similar, speckled with dark brown spots on a +ground of creamy stone.</p> + +<p>The parent bird slips off the nest very quietly and returns very cautiously by +short runs. It is naturally very difficult to follow in the great waste of sand +and shingle. When disturbed on the breeding ground the old birds behave +much as other sand plovers, flying round uneasily in circles and running about +swiftly, but were less noisy than common or lesser ringed plovers.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Doctor Stejneger (1885) says that the young ones are +found—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>about the middle of July. About this time the families retire from the +beach and are now met with in the interior, where they ascend the mountains +in search of tender insects. I frequently met them at an altitude of 1,000 feet +or more above sea level. About the middle of September the families return to +the lowlands and to the beach, soon afterwards leaving the islands.</p> + +<p>While at Glinka, on Copper Island, in July, 1883, a young bird of this species, +not yet fully feathered, was brought to me alive. Allowed to run free on the +floor it immediately commenced a very animated pursuit of the rather numerous +flies, which were caught with remarkable precision and rapidity and devoured +with an unsatiable appetite. The little fellow did not pay any attention to the +presence of several persons in the small room, but when the dog rose from his +nap in the corner, the swift-footed fly killer suddenly dropped flat on the floor, +with withdrawn neck, making himself as small and flat as possible, and remained +thus perfectly immovable until the dog turned his head the other way, +then he ran off to the darkest corner of the room, where he remained until the +former laid down in his old place. Then he started the fly hunting again; +the dog rose once more, and the same performance was repeated. Within half +an hour, however, he had learned that the dog did not take any notice of him +whatever, and consequently he afterwards paid as little attention to the dog +as to man.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_256">[Pg 256]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The young bird referred to above was about half +grown and largely feathered when it died, but the specimen shows +a little of the natal down, mainly on the head, which is largely +downy. The forehead is buffy white, the crown mostly dark “bister,” +and the sides of the head are mottled with buffy and “bister”; the +throat is pale buff. The remiges are half grown and the new feathers +of the mantle are “sepia,” with “cinnamon-buff” tips; the feathers +of the breast are “cinnamon buff” or “pinkish buff” and those of +the belly are white.</p> + +<p>Evidently the juvenal plumage soon fades, for a specimen taken +on September 22, in full juvenal plumage, is much paler. The entire +upper parts are “hair brown” or “drab,” with narrow, pale, buffy +edgings; the forehead and under parts are white, but the breast +is suffused with “pinkish buff” and invaded on the sides with the +“drab” of the upper parts.</p> + +<p>There is not sufficient material to show the molts and plumages +satisfactorily. Adults have a complete molt in August and September, +at which the cinnamon of the chest, neck, and head entirely +disappears.</p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—Doctor Stejneger (1885) says that “the call note is a clear, +penetrating <i>drrrriit</i>.” Mr. Jourdain adds: “The call note is described +by Whistler as a soft <i>twip</i>, and the alarm note as a sort of +chatter of two syllables <i>corr up</i>, not unlike the note of a frog and +compared by Osmaston to that of a nightjar. It is uttered usually +on the wing and also occasionally on the ground.”</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Eastern Asia and Oceanica; accidental in Alaska.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—This race of the Mongolian plover breeds +chiefly in northeastern Siberia (Cape Serdze, Bering Island, Kamchatka, +and the Commander Islands); probably also in Dauria and +Mongolia.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range includes the Philippine Islands, +the Moluccas, New Guinea, and northern Australia.</p> + +<p><i>Migration.</i>—The species has been noted to arrive in spring at +Yokohama, Japan, on April 28, and at Bering Island, on May 11. +A late fall date on Bering Island is September 22.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—On June 11, 1925, an adult male was collected +at Cape Prince of Wales (Bailey). Two specimens were taken by +C. G. Harrold on Nunivak Island, Alaska, in 1927, one on August +14, and one on September 1; others were seen on August 14 and +September 11 and 13. These are the only North American records.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Bering Island, June 4. Siberia, June 9.</p> + + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_257">[Pg 257]</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">PAGOLLA WILSONIA WILSONIA</span> <span class="smaller">(Ord.)</span><br> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">WILSON PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>All along the Atlantic coast from New Jersey to Florida is a +broken chain of sea-girt islands, with broad or steep, sandy or shelly +beaches on the ocean side, backed in many places by shifting sand +dunes and bordered on the inner or bay side by wide marshes of +waving grass or extensive flats exposed at low tide. Here, on the +broader, more open sand flats, among a scattered array of shells, +pebbles, and other débris cast up by the sea, or in the flat hollows +among the sand dunes, this little sand plover makes its home, within +sound of the pounding surf and fanned by the ocean breezes that +carve the dunes into fantastic shapes. Here, if we love to wander in +these seaside solitudes, we may see this gentle bird running along the +beach ahead of us, his feet twinkling so fast that we can hardly see +them; he is unafraid, as he stops and turns to watch us; the black +bands on his head and breast help to obliterate his form and he +might be mistaken for an old seashell or bit of driftwood; but, as +we draw near, he turns and runs on ahead of us, leading us thus on +and on up the beach. There is an air of gentleness in his manner +and an air of wildness in his note as he flies away.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—As the northern limit of the winter range extends well +up to central Florida, the Wilson plover has not far to migrate. +It is an early migrant. We saw it in Pinellas County, Fla., as early +as February 7, where a few were present all winter. C. J. Pennock’s +notes record it at Charlotte Harbor on February 21 and 24, +on two successive years. Arthur T. Wayne (1910) says that +it arrives in South Carolina late in March; his earliest date is +March 26.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—During the month of March, when this species became +common in the vicinity of Tampa Bay, Fla., I had some opportunities +to watch its simple courtship display. A male shot on +March 14 had sexual organs developed nearly to full breeding size +and many of the birds were in pairs. In making the display the +male runs around the female in a crouching, hunchbacked attitude, +with the head lowered, the tail depressed and spread, and the wings +drooping. The female seems indifferent at first, but finally she accepts +the caresses of the male. They seem to be preoccupied in their +love affairs and allow a close approach.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—On the sandy reefs and broad ocean beaches of the +outer islands about Bulls Bay, S. C., we found several nests of +Wilson plover on May 22 and 23, 1915. The nests were on the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_258">[Pg 258]</span>higher portions of the beaches where the dry, sandy plains were +sprinkled with bits of broken shells, small stones, and pieces of driftwood +or other rubbish and where a few scattered weeds and grasses +were the only signs of vegetation. The nests were usually placed near +some such object, or partially sheltered by a few blades of grass, +but some were out on the open sand or in the flat sandy hollows +between the dunes; they were always beyond the reach of ordinary +tides. Oyster-catchers and least terns were nesting in the same +localities and not far away willets were nesting in the grassy places.</p> + +<p>Among the Florida Keys, on May 8, 1903, we found a small colony +nesting on Lake Key; there were beaches of finely broken shells +surrounding a small shallow pond, more or less overgrown with +small, scattered red mangroves. A colony of least terns were nesting +here and a few pairs of black-necked stilts. Four nests of the +plover were found, one out on the open beach among the terns’ nests +and the others under the shelter of little mangrove seedlings. These +and all the other nests of Wilson plover that I have found were +mere hollows in the sand with no apparent attempt at lining, but +others have occasionally found them evidently lined with bits of +broken shell. Henry Thurston (1913) found a nest “snuggled +closely to the stump” of a “ripped up” palmetto; the eggs were +“resting in a small hole that had been scooped out in the sand and +adorned with a few twigs.” He left this nest and returned later +in an attempt to see the female leave the nest. As, he “got within a +few yards the male, unobserved before as he was facing him and +was therefore practically invisible, piped several notes. Swiftly +and mouse-like the female glided from her treasures, crouching low +beside the stump and did not stand erect until she reached the +water’s edge.”</p> + +<p>The Wilson plover might almost be said to nest in colonies, although +the nests are usually not close together; N. B. Moore says in his notes +that they are never nearer than 20 yards apart. Oscar E. Baynard +(1914) found a colony of at least 50 pairs nesting on a bank of white +sand, probably half a mile long and barely a foot above high-water +line. He relates an interesting experience in changing eggs from one +nest to another. One of a set of three heavily incubated eggs that he +had taken hatched out in his possession; as he could not find the nest +from which they came, he hunted up another nest which contained +fresh eggs; and following is his account of what happened:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I took these eggs and placed the young bird and my two eggs in their place, +and then moved off and sat down to watch developments. In a few minutes the +mother bird ran up to the nest, looked hard at the young bird, which had run +off about 2 feet from the eggs, circled the nest several times, and then squatted +down on the two eggs and began calling softly to the young bird. In a few +minutes he crept up to the old bird. She looked him over for fully two minutes, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_259">[Pg 259]</span>then decided to adopt him, raked him under her out of the sun, and settled +down as contentedly as if the family were really her own. Two days later I +ran the boat close to the beach opposite this nest. The old bird ran off, and up +jumped three young and took off up the beach after her.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Donald J. Nicholson tells me that he once found a nest “about +three-quarters of the way up the side of a sand dune under the +shelter of a small bunch of grass.” He has also found this plover +breeding on Merritts Island, Fla., “on the exposed sandy patches +along the Indian River and around the water holes throughout the +island”; here some of the nests were sheltered among open growths +of pickerel weed or <i>Salicornia</i>.</p> + +<p>Dr. Frank M. Chapman (1891) found this bird breeding commonly +near Corpus Christi, Tex., and says: “A nest found April 25 was +placed in some short grass about 50 feet from the water. It was +composed of a few straws placed at the bottom of a slight depression +in the sand, and contained three fresh eggs.”</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The Wilson plover ordinarily lays three eggs, often only +two, and very rarely four; I have a set of four eggs in my collection, +taken by Dr. Eugene E. Murphey on the coast of South Carolina. +N. B. Moore says in his notes that a day often intervened between the +laying of eggs, once an interval of two days occurred and in one +nest the third egg was laid on the ninth day after the first. The eggs +are ovate to short ovate in shape and they have no gloss. The +ground colors vary from “cream buff” to “cartridge buff.” They +are usually thickly and quite evenly covered with small spots, small +irregular blotches and scrawls of black, with a few similar, underlying +markings of pale shades of “Quaker drab.” The measurements +of 66 eggs average 35.7 by 26.2 millimeters; the eggs showing +the four extremes measure <b>38.5</b> by 26, 37 by <b>27</b>, <b>31.5</b> by 26, and 34 by <b>25</b> +millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—N. B. Moore observed that the period of incubation is 24 +or 25 days. I have no data showing that the male shares in the duty +of incubation, but he certainly shows considerable interest in the care +of the young. The young are able to leave the nesting hollow soon +after they are hatched and they are strong and swift runners, as +well as adept in the art of hiding. The female is a past master in the +art of decoying an intruder away from her young. Mr. Thurston +(1913) has described this strategy very well, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>As I approached this strip, seemingly from nowhere there appeared a female +plover, calling plaintively. Now I knew that the season of nesting had begun. +She was soon joined by a male and another female that chorused with her their +wishes for my departure. How she coaxed me to follow her! This I did for +a time, trailing behind as she struggled along on one leg, the other crumpled +under her. Tediously she kept ahead, calling—sobbing, I should have said—one +of the most pathetic yet beautiful notes I have heard. Surely if ever there was a +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_260">[Pg 260]</span>picture of parental distress it was she. Finally, as though exhausted, she sank +to the sand and lay on her side gasping. The other two flew back and forth +overhead, whistling plaintively, but she heeded them not, nor my approach, and +lay there panting. I was sure now that she was tired by her exertion and +hurried to catch her, only to learn that she was “playing possum.” She +allowed me to almost touch her, and fluttered off again. Evidently she was not +satisfied that her nest was safe and she tried new tactics this time. With +seemingly broken wings that trailed as though helpless at her sides, she started +down the beach and once more I followed after, but this time increased my +speed. As I had about caught up with her she gave a joyous whistle, sprang +into the air, and those wounded wings carried her like a bullet around a point +of wooded land and out of sight. She had accomplished her purpose, as I had +hopelessly lost the place from which she started. Search as I might, and did, +I could not find it.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The upper parts of the downy young Wilson plover +are of about the same color pattern as the egg to make it equally +invisible on the sand. The crown, back, rump, wings, and thighs are +“cream buff,” mottled with black; the forehead, sides of the head, +and under parts are white; there is a broad white collar around the +neck, and the outer joint of the wing is white.</p> + +<p>The juvenal plumage, in what specimens I have seen, July 20 to +27, is much like that of the adult female in winter, but the colors are +duller and the breast band is incomplete or only suggested. Perhaps +earlier in the season these birds might have shown buffy edgings +which had since worn away. Probably a postjuvenal molt takes +place, but I have not been able to trace it. In the first winter plumage +the sexes are alike; but at the first prenuptial molt, in February +and March, the male assumes, partially at least, the black markings +on the head and breast. At the next complete molt, the first postnuptial, +the adult winter plumage is acquired.</p> + +<p>Adults have an incomplete prenuptial molt, from January to +March, involving the body plumage, and a complete postnuptial molt, +from July to October. The sexes are quite unlike in nuptial plumage, +the black markings on the head and breast of the male being +replaced by “wood brown” in the female. In winter they are much +alike, but I believe that in fully adult males there is always more or +less black in the breast band.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Audubon (1840) says of these birds:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They feed fully as much by night as by day, and the large eyes of this, as of +other species of the genus, seem to fit them for nocturnal searchings. Their +food consists principally of small marine insects, minute shellfish, and sand +worms, with which they mix particles of sand.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The stomachs of five birds taken on the coast of Alabama by +Arthur H. Howell (1924) contained “crabs and shrimps, with a few +mollusks and flies.” One taken in Porto Rico by Stuart T. Danforth +(1926) contained Dytiscid larvae and adults.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_261">[Pg 261]</span></p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Audubon (1840) describes the behavior of this plover +very well, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The flight of this species, is rapid, elegant, and protracted. While traveling +from one sand beach or island to another, they fly low over the land or +water, emitting a fine, clear, soft note. Now and then, when after the breeding +season they form into flocks of 20 or 30, they perform various evolutions in +the air, cutting backward and forward, as if inspecting the spot on which +they wish to alight, and then suddenly descend, sometimes on the sea beach +and sometimes on the more elevated sands at a little distance from it. They +do not run so nimbly as the piping plovers nor are they nearly so shy. I have +in fact frequently walked up so as to be within 10 yards or so of them. They +seldom mix with other species, and they show a decided preference to solitary +uninhabited spots.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—My field notes, written over 20 years ago, refer to Wilson +plover flying about their breeding grounds, whistling their musical +call notes, somewhat suggestive of the notes of the piping plover, but +not so loud nor so rich in tone. Francis M. Weston writes to me +that “the note of anxiety, when on the ground, is a sharp <i>wheet</i>, +beween a chirp and a whistle. On the wing, it gives a low <i>tut-tut</i>, +somewhat like the alarm note of the wood thrush, but pitched lower +and never of more than two syllables.” C. J. Pennock says, in his +notes, that when they have eggs or young “they fly about close +overhead, or run along the sand, calling <i>queet, queet, quit it, quit it</i>, +in a high-pitched tone, frequently three or four birds joining in the +vocal protest.” John T. Nichols says in his notes: “The commonest +note of this species on the ground and on the wing is a ternlike +<i>quip</i>, sometimes double <i>qui-pip</i>. Less frequently, on the ground, it +has a surprisingly human whistled <i>whip</i>.”</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The best field character of the Wilson plover is the +long, heavy, wholly black bill, which is very conspicuous in all +plumages; it is relatively larger and more prominent than that of +the black-bellied plover. The Wilson is decidedly larger than the +semipalmated or the piping plover; it is slightly lighter in color +than the former and much darker than the latter. I have noticed +that in flight it appears quite dark colored above, with no conspicuous +white except in the lateral tail feathers.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—We recorded this species as a winter resident on the west +coast of Florida as far north as Tampa Bay, but it was rare in midwinter +and did not become common until March. It frequented the +sand bars and sandy islands on the Gulf shore, together with other +small plovers and sandpipers. It was much tamer than any of the +other shore birds and less active; it was the only one of the whole +tribe that could be openly approached on the unprotected beaches. +It was usually seen singly, apart from the others, and never in flocks.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_262">[Pg 262]</span></p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Southern United States, the West Indies, Central and +South America.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The Wilson plover breeds north to probably +Lower California (La Paz); Texas (Brownsville, Corpus Christi, +probably Rockport, probably Matagorda Island, Houston, and Galveston); +Louisiana (probably Cameron Parish and the Breton +Island Reservation); Mississippi (Dog Key); probably Alabama +(Bayou Labatre and Dauphin Island); western Florida (Milton and +probably James Island); and formerly New Jersey (Beach Haven). +East to formerly New Jersey (Beach Haven, probably Great Egg +Harbor, and Cape May); Virginia (Cobb Island and Cape Charles); +North Carolina (Pea Island, Beaufort, and Cape Fear); South Carolina +(Bulls Bay, Sullivan Island, and Frogmore); Georgia (Tybee +Island, Ossabaw Island, and Blackbeard Island); the east coast of +Florida (Fernandina, Amelia Island, Matanzas Inlet, Mosquito +Inlet, and Coronado Beach); the Bahama Islands (New Providence, +Rum Cay, and Inagua Island); and probably Porto Rico. South to +probably Porto Rico; probably Jamaica (Great Salt Pond and Port +Henderson); probably Cuba (Trinidad); and British Honduras +(Grassy Cay). West to British Honduras (Grassy Cay); Gulf of +California; and probably Lower California (La Paz).</p> + +<p>The status of the species in the southern part of its summer range +has not yet been definitely settled, and some alleged races have been +described, whose breeding ranges are undoubtedly included in the +summary given above.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The species has been detected in winter north to +Lower California (San Jose Island); Sonora (Guaymas); Texas +(probably rarely Brownsville and Matagorda County); probably +Louisiana (Vermilion Bay); Mississippi (Hancock County); and +Florida (mouth of the St. Johns River). East to Florida (mouth of +the St. Johns River, St. Augustine, New Smyrna, and Key West); +the Bahama Islands (Andros Islands and Watling Island); probably +Santo Domingo (Samana); probably Porto Rico (Culebra Island +and Vieques Island); the Lesser Antilles (Anegada); French Guiana +(Cayenne and Rio Oyapok); and Brazil (Cajetuba, Bahia, and +Camamu). South to Brazil (Camamu); and Peru (Tumbez). West +to Peru (Tumbez); Ecuador (Puna Island); Colombia (Cartagena +and Sabanilla); Honduras (Swan Islands); Guatemala (Chiapam); +and Lower California (La Paz and San Jose Island).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are Georgia, +Cumberland, March 18, and Darien, March 19; South Carolina, Bulls +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_263">[Pg 263]</span>Point, March 10, Frogmore, March 20, and Mount Pleasant, March +26; North Carolina, Fort Macon, April 15, and Pea and Bodie +Islands, April 24; and Virginia, Toms Brook, April 8.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Almost nothing is known about the fall migration +of this plover but Wayne (1910) says that it remains on the beaches +of South Carolina “until September 22, or perhaps until October.”</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—Wilson plovers have been noted or collected on +several occasions outside of their normal range. Most of these have +naturally been in New York and on the coast of New England. +Among them are: New York, three at Far Rockaway, May 17, 1879, +one at Shinnecock Bay, May 16, 1884, one at Good Ground, May 28, +1879, Orient, July 3, 1915, and Long Beach, July 1, 1872; Connecticut, +taken once at Stratford, and seen at Bridgeport on July 28, +1888; Massachusetts, Gurnet Point, August 22, 1877, one at Ipswich, +May 8, 1904, and about 25 reported as seen at Dennis, September 4, +1920; Nova Scotia, one at Brier Island, April 28, 1880; and one +from Halifax that is preserved in the British Museum; and California, +one taken at Pacific Beach, June 27, 1894, and another seen +at Imperial Beach, May 11, 1918.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Virginia: 22 records, May 4 to June 20; 11 records, +May 27 to June 6. South Carolina and Georgia: 50 records, April +14 to June 21; 25 records, May 17 to June 10. Florida: 26 records, +April 2 to July 10; 13 records, May 12 to June 11. Texas: 11 records, +April 7 to June 18; 6 records, April 20 to May 19.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Mtn"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">PODASOCYS MONTANUS</span> <span class="smaller">(J. K. Townsend)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">MOUNTAIN PLOVER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The above name is not especially appropriate for this species. +The name, Rocky Mountain plover, would have been better, for its +breeding range is mainly in the Rocky Mountain plateau. It frequents +elevated ground but it is not a bird of the mountains but of the +dry plains. Coues (1874) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>While most other plovers haunt the vicinity of water, to which some are +almost confined, the present species is not in the least degree of aquatic habits, +but, on the contrary, resorts to plains as dry and sterile as any of our country—sometimes +the grassy prairies, with shore larks and titlarks, various ground +sparrows, and the burrowing owl; sometimes sandy deserts, where the sage +brush and the “chamizo,” the prickly pear and the Spanish bayonet, grow in +full luxuriance. It approaches the Pacific, but will never be found on the beach +itself, with maritime birds, nor even on the adjoining mud-flats or marshes, +preferring the firm, grassy fields further back from the water.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_264">[Pg 264]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—W. C. Bradbury (1918) has given us a very good account +of the nesting habits of the mountain plover in Colorado. Of +the nesting site and nest he says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The ground is an open, rolling prairie, above the line of irrigation, and is +devoted to cattle range. It is several miles from natural surface water and +streams, and is covered with short-cropped buffalo or gramma grass, 2 or 3 +inches high, with frequent bunches of dwarfed prickly pear, and an occasional +cluster of stunted shrub or weed, rarely more than a foot in height. With +the six sets secured, in no instance had the parent bird taken advantage of the +slight protection offered from sight or the elements by the nearby cactus, +shrubs or uneven spots of ground. In each case, she had avoided such shelter, +locating in the open, generally between the small grass hummocks and not on +or in them; there was no evidence of the parent birds having given more +thought to nest preparation or concealment, than does any other plover. In +two of the sets the eggs were all individually embedded in the baked earth to +a depth of one-eighth to one-fourth of an inch, evidently having settled when +the surface of the ground was reduced to soft mud by rain-water collecting +in the slight depressions. As the ground dried up the eggs were fixed in a +perfect mould or matrix, from which they could not roll. In fact they could +hardly be disturbed at all by the sitting birds. The only nesting material +was a small quantity of fine, dry rootlets and “crowns” of gramma grass, +the eggs in some instances being slightly embedded in this lining. As it is +also present in all other depressions on the prairie it is highly probable that +here as elsewhere it was deposited about the eggs by the wind and not through +the agency of the birds themselves. The protective coloration of the nest +and eggs, as well as of the rear view of the birds themselves, even when in +motion, is unsurpassed. In no instance, except one hereinafter noted, was the +bird seen to leave the nest, nor was any nest found except in the immediate +vicinity of moving birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>H. G. Hoskin (1893) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The mountain plover builds its nest on open prairie. The first egg is laid +on bare ground, and as the set is finished and incubation advances the bird +gradually makes a nest of dirt, pieces of hard grass, roots, etc. It takes five +or six days to complete set of three eggs. I have never found more nor less +than three eggs in a nest that I thought complete. Old birds will fly off the +nest while a person on foot is 80 rods away, but will sit closely for man on +horseback or in a buggy.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>William G. Smith (1888) found three nests while traveling by +wagon across the Laramie Plains in Wyoming. “They were all +placed within 50 yards of the much-frequented roadway, and each +time I saw the female sitting on the eggs. The old birds are very +white which contrasts with the dark ground and causes them to be +easily seen.” The art of feigning lameness or injury, to entice the +intruder away from eggs or young, seems to be very highly developed +in this species. Mr. Smith speaks of one that seemed to be in a fit, +as it lay on its side, within 6 feet of him, “apparently in strong convulsions.” +Mr. Bradbury (1918) tells of one that, “spreading her +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_265">[Pg 265]</span>wings horizontally to their extreme width while standing, then +falling flat with her neck and wings extended their full length on +the ground, at times with beak open, she retreated as he approached, +or followed closely as he returned toward the nest.”</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The mountain plover lays almost invariably three eggs, +occasionally only two, and four eggs have been recorded. They are +ovate to short ovate in shape, with no gloss. The prevailing ground +colors are “deep olive buff” or “dark olive buff”; some few are +“chamois” and one pink set has a “light pinkish cinnamon” ground +color. They are irregularly marked, but chiefly near the larger end, +with small spots and scrawls of black, which sometimes form a ring +near the larger end. The measurments of 58 eggs average 37.3 by +28.3 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>40</b> by +28.5, 37.5 by <b>29.2</b>, <b>34.3</b> by 28.4, and 38.5 by <b>27</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Apparently both sexes incubate; an incubating male has +been taken. William G. Smith says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The young are very nimble when only a few days old, and it is quite a task to +catch them. They do not attempt to hide. A peculiarity of these birds is, +though three eggs are generally laid, I never saw but two young with the old +birds. I lived on the prairies for six years, a mile from any other habitation; +I had every opportunity to observe the traits of these birds. When they are +well able to run each of the old birds takes one to raise, and that method seems +the rule.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Edward R. Warren’s (1912) observations do not agree with the +above, for he has seen a parent with three young and has seen the +young attempt to hide; but he says “it was easily seen when once +found, for its colors did not blend particularly well with the ground +it was on.”</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—In the downy young mountain plover the upper parts +are “cream buff,” tinged with “chamois” on the crown, wings, and +rump, shading off to buffy white on the throat and under parts; the +crown, sides of the neck, occiput, back, wings, rump, and thighs are +conspicuously spotted with black; the forehead is unmarked. Young +birds, about half grown, show the juvenal plumage coming in on the +back, scapulars, crown, and sides of the breast, with the wing quills +bursting their sheaths.</p> + +<p>In full juvenal plumage, in September, the crown, back, scapulars, +and wing coverts are “buffy brown,” with “cinnamon-buff” edges, +broadest on the wing coverts; the sides of the head are “pinkish buff” +and the breast and flanks are suffused with the same color; the throat +and belly are white. This plumage seems to be worn without much +change, except by wear and fading, all through the first fall and +winter. The upper parts are still mainly “buffy brown,” but with +only the faintest trace of the edgings. The spring molt apparently +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_266">[Pg 266]</span>does not involve the wing coverts and very few scapulars, so that +young birds can be recognized by these retained feathers.</p> + +<p>Adults have a partial prenuptial molt in March and April, involving +the body plumage but not the wings and tail and not all the +scapulars and wing coverts. The black markings on the head are +acquired and the new feathers of the mantle are broadly tipped with +“pinkish buff.” The complete postnuptial molt is accomplished in +July and August. The winter plumage is similar to the nuptial, +except that the black loral patch is lacking and the black crown patch +is replaced by dull brown.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Feeding on the dry upland plains and prairies, the mountain +plover’s food consists almost wholly, if not entirely, of insects. +Grasshoppers seem to be its principal food, but many crickets, beetles, +and flies are eaten. It seems to be a wholly beneficial species. Grinnell, +Bryant, and Storer (1918) quote Belding as saying “that he +often found this plover in recently sown grain fields, but was never +able to discover a single kernel of wheat in the stomachs of those he +shot.”</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Coues (1874) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They were not difficult of approach, and I had no difficulty in securing as many +as I desired. On being disturbed by too near approach, they lower the head, +run rapidly a few steps in a light, easy way, and then stop abruptly, drawing +themselves up to their full height and looking around with timid yet unsuspicious +glances. When forced to fly by persistent annoyance, they rise rapidly +with quick wing beats and then proceed with alternate sailing and flapping, +during the former action holding the wings decurved. They generally fly low +over the ground and soon realight, taking a few mincing steps as they touch the +ground; they then either squat low, in hopes of hiding, or stand on tip-toe, as it +were, for a better view of what alarmed them.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Grinnell, Bryant, and Storer (1918) say:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This plover is a flocking species found in bands of from fifteen to several hundred +individuals. Often upon alighting after they have been in flight, the birds +will immediately run to some distance, so that it is not always possible to +follow them up easily as with other shore birds. The flocks fly low over the +ground and are difficult to see, except when they wheel. As they do this the +under surfaces of their wings show momentarily as silvery white flashes.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Aiken and Warren (1914) say:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The mountain plover differs greatly in habits and characteristics from its +near relative the killdeer. It shows no preference for wet ground but on the +contrary frequents mesas or high rolling prairie land, often remote from water. +Their manner is quiet; they have no wailing cry; they run rapidly a short distance +and stand silent and motionless with the head sunk low on the shoulders. +Their unspotted plumage blends with the color of the dry grass and parched +ground and makes them difficult to discover. But in August, when the young +birds shift for themselves, they gather in flocks and repair to the vicinity of +water holes and flooded fields.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>William G. Smith says in his notes:</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_267">[Pg 267]</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p>We have often foretold a hailstorm, which are very prevalent here in summer, +by these birds coming near the house for protection; at these times they seem +bewildered, and nothing will drive them away.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—Coues (1874) says on this subject:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Their notes are rather peculiar, as compared with those of our other plovers, +and vary a good deal, according to circumstances. When the birds are feeding +at their leisure, and in no way apprehensive of danger, they utter a low and +rather pleasing whistle, though in a somewhat drawling or rather lisping tone; +but the note changes to a louder and higher one, sometimes sounding harshly.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The mountain plover may be recognized as a medium +sized plover, dressed in plain colors. In the spring the black markings +on the head are visible at short range, but otherwise it is dull, +sandy brown above and white below, without the conspicuous markings +of the killdeer. In flight its axillars and the under sides of +its wings are conspicuously white.</p> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—This species once figured as a game bird and many were +shot and sold as game in the California markets. It was a fair-sized +bird of some food value, but it was not so highly prized, as a +table bird, when compared with some others. John G. Tyler (1916) +writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Had not the Federal law intervened these birds would soon have disappeared +forever, as their habits made them a very easy victim for hunters. The birds +feed in loose scattered flocks, ranging over much ground, but when sufficiently +disturbed all the members of a company take wing and form into a dense +flock which, after beating rapidly back and forth for a few moments, usually +settles again within a few yards of the intruder, a full hundred birds often +occupying a space no larger than 20 feet in diameter. As they alight each bird +flattens itself upon the ground where its protective coloration renders it all but +invisible save for the winking of its very large eyes.</p> + +<p>As one old resident stated, a favorite method of hunting was to drive with +a horse and buggy among the scattered birds and cause them to take wing, +whereupon the horse was brought to a standstill until the birds had again settled +on the ground, and in nearly every case this was within easy gun range. The +hunter immediately “ground sluiced” them with one barrel just as they +“squatted” and fired again as the survivors took wing. My informant stated +that he once killed 65 birds with two shots, and this method very rarely netted +less than 30. I was informed that this plover was rated as the best table bird in +this part of the State and that parties sometimes came from points as far away +as San Francisco to hunt them. Verily, as my friend remarked, “they don’t +seem to be as plentiful as they were 25 years ago.”</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Western United States and Mexico; accidental in Florida +and Massachusetts.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The mountain plover breeds north to Montana +(Great Falls, Fort Benton, Big Sandy, and the mouth of Milk +River); and North Dakota (Stump Lake). East to North Dakota +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_268">[Pg 268]</span>(Stump Lake and probably Hankison); western South Dakota +(Edgemont); Nebraska (probably Harrison, probably Marsland, +North Platte, and Kearney); Kansas (Colby, Oakley, probably Hays, +Garden City, and probably Fort Dodge); and Oklahoma (probably +Camp Supply and Fort Cobb). South to Oklahoma (Fort Cobb); +Texas (Washburn, Hereford, and probably Fort Davis); New +Mexico (Otero County and Socorro County); and probably Arizona +(Fort Whipple). West to probably Arizona (Fort Whipple); Colorado +(probably Del Norte, Denver, Barr, and Loveland); Wyoming +(Cheyenne, Laramie, probably Fort Bridger, and probably Dubois); +Idaho (Pahsimeroi Valley); and Montana (Three Forks and Great +Falls).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The mountain plover has the curious habit of +occupying a winter range that is farther west than its summer home. +North to California (probably rarely Marysville); Arizona (Santa +Rosa, Buenos Ayres, and Allaires Ranch); and Texas (San Antonio). +East to Texas (San Antonio, Eagle Pass, Aransas River, and +Brownsville); Tamaulipas (Matamoros); and Zacatecas (Zacatecas). +South to Zacatecas (Zacatecas); and Lower California (La +Paz). West to Lower California (La Paz); Sonora (Santa Rosa and +Hermosillo); and California (San Diego, Santa Ana, Los Angeles, +Fort Tejon, Alila, Paicines, probably Stockton, and probably rarely +Marysville).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Sufficient data are not available to clearly +define the migratory flights of the mountain plover but among early +dates of spring arrival are: Oklahoma, Norman, March 15; Colorado, +Loveland, March 18, Burlington, March 22, Barr, March 23, Springfield, +March 29, Denver, April 6, and Colorado Springs, April 19; +Wyoming, Cheyenne, April 5, Big Piney, April 12, and Fort Sanders, +April 21; South Dakota, Huron, April 16; and Montana, Big +Sandy, May 4, and Fort Custer, May 12.</p> + +<p>A late date of spring departure from California is Santa Ysabel, +April 3.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of fall arrival in California are: +Firebaugh, September 11, and Montebello, September 15.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are Montana, Sun River, September 4, +Camp Thorne, on the Yellowstone, September 13, and Big Sandy, +September 18; South Dakota, Forestburg, September 20; Nebraska, +Monroe Canyon, September 27; Wyoming, Efell, September 4, and +Sweetwater, September 13; Colorado, Barr, October 12, and Beloit, +October 15; and New Mexico, Santa Rosa, September 27, and Stinking +Spring Lake, October 1.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The mountain plover has been detected outside +of its normal range on but few occasions, three of which, curiously +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_269">[Pg 269]</span>enough, were in Florida. A flock of six was noted on December 1, +1870, at Key West, and one specimen obtained (Maynard); R. W. +Williams records several at St. James Island between July 20 and +August 1, 1901; and on December 17, 1927, R. J. Longstreet secured +a specimen at Daytona Beach. The only other record is one for +Massachusetts, an immature male, taken at North Beach, near Chatham, +on October 28, 1916, and preserved in the collections of the +Boston Society of Natural History (Brooks).</p> + +<p>The species is unknown from Canada. During the international +boundary survey, Doctor Coues found mountain plover on Frenchman +Creek and obtained a specimen that is now in the British +Museum. This is reported as being labeled “forty-ninth parallel,” +but the point of collection was probably well within the present State +of Montana.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Colorado and Kansas: 74 records, April 30 to June +16; 37 records, May 14 to 26. Montana and Wyoming: 4 records, +May 22 to July 9.</p> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + + +<div class="chapter" id="APHRIZIDAE"> +<h2 style="display: none; visibility: hidden;">Family APHRIZIDAE. Surf birds and Turnstones</h2> +<p class="center">Family APHRIZIDAE. Surf birds and Turnstones</p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">APHRIZA VIRGATA</span> <span class="smaller">(Gmelin)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">SURF BIRD</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>From its summer home in the mountains of central Alaska the +surf bird migrates down the Pacific coasts of North and South +America as far as the Straits of Magellan. Twice each year some +individuals make this long journey, while others are scattered along +the coasts from southern Alaska southward. Consequently it may +be found, chiefly on migrations but occasionally at other seasons, by +those who seek it on the outlying rocky ledges, reefs, and promontories +all along the Pacific coast. As its name implies, it is a bird +of the surf line, associated in its rocky habitat with turnstones +and wandering tattlers, unmindful of the flying spray. It well deserves +its generic name, which is taken from two Greek words, +<i>aphros</i>, meaning sea foam, and <i>zao</i>, I live.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The spring migration is directly north along the coasts +of both continents. It is difficult to trace the dates, as the winter +range is so extensive. The latest recorded date for the Straits of +Magellan is March 3; and the earliest date of arrival at the Kobuk +River, Alaska, is May 29. The main flight along the California +coast seems to come in March. Dr. Joseph Grinnell (1909) reports +a flight at Admiralty Island, Alaska, on May 12, “a flock estimated to +contain 300 waders, fully two-thirds of which were of this species.” +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_270">[Pg 270]</span>Harry S. Swarth (1911) says that, at Kuiu Island, Alaska, between +April 25 and May 6, “it was abundant and in large flocks, feeding in +company with the numerous other waders frequenting the mud flats.” +H. B. Conover saw it only once at Hooper Bay, Alaska, on May 18.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The breeding grounds and the nesting habits of the surf +bird long remained unknown. The birds vanished from the coast of +Alaska about the first of June and were not seen again for six weeks +or more, when they appeared again with their young. Rumors suggested +that they bred in the mountains in the interior. O. J. Murie +(1924) gave us the first definite information, when he discovered +the breeding ground of the species in the Mount McKinley Park +region of central Alaska. On July 13, 1921, he was descending a +slope above timber line, “when two surf birds were flushed and +circled about making an outcry.” He was “presently rewarded by +seeing a downy young one striding away bravely over the rough +ground.” The young bird was secured and one of the parents, which +proved to be the male, thus establishing the first breeding record for +the species.</p> + +<p>Five years later Joseph Dixon (1927) spent considerable time in +this same region and succeeded in finding, on May 28, 1926, the first +nest of the surf bird. He took some excellent photographs and made +a thorough study of the bird and its habits, thus completing the +picture very satisfactorily. I shall quote freely from his excellent +published account of it. Regarding the nesting site and the nest he +writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>One of the most striking things about the surf bird is the remarkable difference +between its winter and summer habitat. Near the end of their northward +migration in the spring these birds abandon the seacoast and take up their summer +residence far in the interior, from 300 to 500 miles from salt water. This +involves a great altitudinal shift. Instead of living at sea level as they do at +other seasons, during nesting time they are to be found on barren, rocky +mountains high up above timber line. During the entire summer we never +found these birds below 4,000 feet elevation.</p> + +<p>The rocky character of the surf birds’ surroundings appears to remain fairly +constant throughout the year. In summer the birds are to be found most +frequently near the summits of the rock slides where the broken rocks are +much the same as the rugged reefs they inhabit during the winter. We found +in the Mount McKinley district that the summer range of the surf bird was +almost identical with that of the mountain sheep and that it was useless to +look for surf birds outside of “sheep” country.</p> + +<p>When standing on a barren wind-swept ridge late in the afternoon of May +28, searching a nearby hillside with binoculars, Mr. Wright’s attention was +attracted to a grayish bird that was sneaking hurriedly along over the rocky +ground. As he watched, the bird apparently faded out of sight some 600 +feet away. Marking the point of disappearance he hurried over to the +spot where the bird was last seen and, falling to find the bird, began to +think he was mistaken. But, upon his taking one more step, the bird flew up +suddenly right into his face, startling him mightily. As the bird flew away, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_271">[Pg 271]</span>the large white rump patch, together with a white patch on either wing, +brought realization that this was the long-sought-for surf bird. A hasty glance +at his feet revealed the nest and contents of four eggs. Another step forward +and he would have placed his foot directly in the nest! To George M. Wright +belongs the honor of being the first white man, of which we have any record, +to lay eyes on the nest and eggs of this rare bird.</p> + +<p>The surf bird’s nest was located 1,000 feet above timber line on a rocky ridge +that faced southwest and lay fair to the sun and hence was relatively free +from snow. The nest site was on dry rocky ground and not on the wet tundra +which was plentiful nearby. The rocky ground about the nest was clothed +with a thin carpet of alpine-arctic vegetation, the tallest of which were a few +creeping arctic willows less than 2 inches high. The most conspicuous plant +about the nest was the white-flowered <i>Dryas integrifolia</i>. The nest was +entirely out in the open with no bushes that afford the least concealment. +In fact it was almost “out in the street,” since the eggs were within a foot +of a frequently traveled trail of the white Alaska mountain sheep (<i>Ovis dalli</i>). +There was no fabricated nest such as the wandering tattler makes. Instead, +the eggs were deposited in a natural erosional depression, the sides of which +had been lined with a few bits of dried-up grayish-green lichens and caribou +moss. The bottom of the nest was composed of the dead emarginate leaves +of <i>Dryas integrifolia</i>, which only partially covered the crumbling serpentine +outcrop that formed the backbone of the ridge. The nest, which was barely +large enough to hold the four eggs, which were placed as close together as +possible, with little ends down, measured 4 inches in diameter and an inch +and a half in depth. The eggs in the nest blended so well with the reddish +brown moss of the tundra that it became difficult to make them out at a +distance of more than 8 or 10 feet.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The nest was found at nearly 9 o’clock in the evening. They built +a crude shelter of rocks near it and kept a careful watch over it all +that night and half of the next day. During this time Mr. Dixon +(1927) made these observations:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When it began to rain the surf bird merely fluffed up and then spread out the +feathers on his back so as completely to cover the nest. This proved an effective +method, because the melting snow and the rain ran readily off the surf-bird’s +back and was absorbed by the moss outside the nest. We were not so +well protected and were soon shivering and wet to the skin.</p> + +<p>At 4 o’clock a female mountain sheep appeared, silently, like a ghost, out of +the mist that came drifting over the mountain peaks in great white swirls. +She did not see us at first, but when she was within 6 feet of and headed +directly toward the surf-bird’s nest she became suddenly aware of our presence +and took a step or two forward. When the ewe was about to step on the nest +the surf bird suddenly “exploded” right in the astonished animal’s face. This +unexpected movement and the sudden noise and flash of white of the bird’s +spread wings and tail caused the mountain sheep to jump back quickly; then +she whirled around and bounded off back up the trail. This sudden movement +of the surf bird at the critical moment doubtless serves to prevent sheep and +caribou from trampling upon its nest and eggs. We found through repeated +experiments that this was the bird’s regular reaction. When we approached, +whether fast or slow, the bird would stay on the nest until the last minute, +and then, instead of sneaking off low to the ground like most birds do, would +fly directly up into our faces. Even after we knew that the bird would do +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_272">[Pg 272]</span>this the psychological result on our part was the same. A person would involuntarily +recoil when the bird “exploded” like a firecracker right in his face.</p> + +<p>When first frightened off the nest by Mr. Wright the previous afternoon the +bird, which we later thought might have been the female, after “exploding,” +ran away with wings half spread and the tail spread out fanlike and dragging +on the ground. This displayed conspicuously the white rump patch. Now and +then this bird would nestle down as though covering a nest. When about +100 yards distant from the nest the bird began to wander about, pretending to +feed. It exhibited no concern whatever when Mr. Wright returned to the nest +and examined the eggs. It made no attempt to return to the nest even after +the observer had retired to a distance and waited for a period of 10 minutes, +during which interval rain began to fall.</p> + +<p>In marked contrast with this rather indifferent attitude, the bird which +was watched on the nest for 16 hours, behaved in an entirely different manner. +This second bird, when forced off the nest, would fly directly up into the +intruder’s face, and then run off to one side, a distance of 8 or 10 feet, where +it would perch on a rock, fluff out its feathers like a “sitting” hen and +utter a low plaintive call, <i>tee-tee-teet!</i> The call would often be repeated two +or three times after a slight pause of half a minute between calls. When we +started after this bird it would lead us adroitly away from the nest; but +if we stood still it would soon hustle directly back, even when we were standing +only 10 feet distant. In going on to the nest the bird was very careful +not to step directly upon the eggs. It would trot up to within a foot or so of +the eggs and then sneak cautiously down to the edge of the nest. Here it +would stop, inspect the eggs, and reach out with its bill and turn the eggs +about, keeping them little ends down. Following this inspection the bird +fluffed out the feathers on its breast and sitting down gently on the edge of +the nest, slid its body forward with great care, until the eggs were completely +covered.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—I have not yet seen these eggs, so I will quote Mr. Dixon’s +(1927) excellent description of them:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The eggs of the surf bird are not easily confused with the eggs of any other +North American sandpiper or plover. In shape they are pyriform but, though +similar in form to eggs of other birds of the order Limicolae, in color they +appear more like eggs of the falcons, particularly certain eggs of the sparrow +hawk and prairie falcon.</p> + +<p>In the type set, which is now safely housed in the well-known Thayer +collection, there is considerable variation both in the ground color and in the +markings of the eggs. Three eggs of this set have an intensely buffy ground +color, while the fourth egg is of the same color but decidedly lighter. The +markings on the three eggs are bold, varying in color from fawn to bay. The +markings on the fourth egg are small and evenly distributed. The four +eggs may be described as follows: The first egg has a light ground color +which equals tilleul-buff. In this egg the marking consists of fine splashes, +one-half to two millimeters in length. There is but slight tendency for the +markings to form a wreath on the larger end. A few small dark brown spots +on its larger end identifies this egg, which resembles slightly certain eggs of +the yellow-billed magpie. In egg number two the ground color is rich tilleul-buff, +while the markings consist of bold bay-colored spots and splashes from +one-half to three millimeters in length. These spots are concentrated about +the larger end of the egg, where in places they are so dense as completely +to obscure the ground color. A few deep-seated lavender under-shell markings +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_273">[Pg 273]</span>are apparent on this egg. Egg number three is similar both in ground color +and in markings to egg number two, except in egg number three the heavy +bay markings form a decided wreath 21 millimeters in diameter about its +larger end. Egg number four has the richest ground color of all, while its +markings are fawn, but the markings are not so sharply defined as in the +other eggs.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The four eggs measure <b>43.7</b> by 30.5, 41.5 by <b>31.5</b>, 43.3 by 31.2, and +<b>42.4</b> by <b>31</b>, and they average 42.7 by 31 millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Mr. Dixon (1927) demonstrated most conclusively that +the male does most, if not all, of the incubating. The bird that +they had under observation for 16 hours and the only one seen near +the nest proved to be the male. All of the five males collected had +bare incubation patches, while none of the females had these. Mr. +Murie (1924) found both parents attending the young bird which +he captured; and the one shot, probably the more solicitous one, +was the male. Evidence is accumulating all the time to show that +with more shore birds than we realize, perhaps with all, the males +perform the greater part of the domestic duties.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The young bird taken by Mr. Murie is still in the +downy stage. The upper parts are variegated and mottled with +“cinnamon buff,” brownish black, “sepia,” and buffy white; the +forehead and sides of the head are buffy white, boldly spotted and +striped with black; the crown is mainly spotted with black; the +buffy tints are mainly on the upper back, wings, thighs, and rump; +the under parts are grayish white, whitest on the chin and belly.</p> + +<p>When the young birds come down to the coast of Alaska, in +August, they are in full juvenal plumage. In this the crown is +streaked with “fuscous” and brownish black, the feathers having +white edgings; the chin and throat are white, with shaft streaks of +“hair brown”; there is a broad band of “hair brown” across the +breast, with white edgings, running into spots below, which are +lacking on the white belly; the mantle is “hair brown,” with very +narrow whitish edgings, giving a scaled appearance; the scapulars +also have a subterminal “fuscous” bar; the lesser and median wing +coverts are broadly or conspicuously edged with grayish white.</p> + +<p>A partial postjuvenal molt in the early fall produces a first winter +plumage which is like the adult winter, except that there are fewer +and smaller spots on the under parts; and the juvenal wing coverts +and some scapulars are retained.</p> + +<p>Two specimens, collected in Peru on June 30, illustrate the first +nuptial plumage. These are doubtless birds which do not migrate +north to breed during their first year. Apparently a nearly complete +molt has taken place, as the wings and tail appear fresh, but +some of the old scapulars and wing coverts are retained. The adult +nuptial plumage is suggested, but all traces of cinnamon are lacking; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_274">[Pg 274]</span>the feathers of the mantle are “fuscous” or “hair brown,” broadly +edged with grayish white and subterminally bordered with brownish +black; the crown is grayish white, streaked with dusky; the +scapulars are “fuscous” to brownish black, broadly tipped, notched, +or spotted with pale grayish; the breast and flanks are less heavily +marked than in the adult. I have not seen this plumage described +elsewhere. At the next molt the adult winter plumage is assumed.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete postnuptial molt in August; I have seen +one with primaries and secondaries molting as early as August 27. +In adult winter plumage the upper parts are uniform “fuscous,” +with only slightly lighter (“hair brown”) edgings; the chin and +throat are white, spotted with “hair brown”; there is a broad band +of “hair brown” across the chest and below it the under parts are +marked on the breast and flanks with hastate spots of “fuscous.”</p> + +<p>A partial prenuptial molt of the body plumage takes place in +April and May, but some of the old winter feathers are generally +retained. In full nuptial plumage the head and neck are grayish +white, everywhere boldly streaked, or spotted, with black and slightly +suffused on the crown with “pinkish cinnamon”; the feathers of +the back are centrally black, broadly edged with white and tinged +with “pinkish cinnamon”; but the most striking features of this +plumage are the scapulars, boldly patterned with “pinkish cinnamon” +and black, with narrow whitish tips; the white under parts +are boldly marked, especially on the breast and flanks, with hastate, +subcordate, or crescentic spots of brownish black. The cinnamon +colors fade during the breeding season to pale buff and eventually to +white in July birds.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—On its breeding grounds in summer the surf bird feeds +almost entirely on insects, mainly flies and beetles. The analysis of +the stomach contents of eight birds, taken in Alaska and examined +by the Biological Survey, shows the following proportions: Diptera, +55.2 per cent; Coleoptera, 36 per cent; Lepidoptera, 3.8 per cent; +Hymenoptera, 3.3 per cent; Phalangidea, 1 per cent; snails, 5 per +cent; and seeds, 2 per cent. Mr. Dixon (1927) says of its feeding +habits:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Three days later seven surf birds were found feeding in company at midday +near this same spot. This time they were foraging near the top of a very steep +talus slope that lay fair to the sun. Only a few scant flowers grew amid the +rocks, but insects were numerous and active. One surf bird which, when later +collected, proved to be a male stood guard while the others fed. The slightest +movement on my part was sufficient to cause a warning note to be given by +this sentinel. When feeding, these birds ran hurriedly over the rocks, traveling +as fast or faster than a man could walk. When an insect was sighted the pursuing +surf bird would stretch out its neck as far and as straight as possible. +Then moving stealthily forward the bird would make a final thrust and secure +the insect in its bill, much in the same manner that a turkey stalks a grasshopper.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_275">[Pg 275]</span></p> + +<p>At other seasons the surf bird feeds along the water line on ocean +beaches, preferring the rocky or stony shores, or reefs exposed at +low tide; here it extracts the soft parts of barnacles, mussels, or other +crustaceans and small mollusks, or picks up other minute forms of +marine life. It also feeds to some extent at the surf line on sandy +beaches or on mud flats, where it picks up similar food from the +surface without probing for it. At such times the birds are quite +pugnacious unless sufficiently scattered.</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Mr. Dixon (1927) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On June 18 three surf birds were seen close under the summit of a mountain. +Here they occasionally ran about and picked up insects, but more often they +stood still on exposed rocks and preened their feathers. One of these three +birds frequently raised both wings willet fashion over its back until they +almost met. These individuals were exceedingly shy and would not allow the +naturalist to approach closer than 100 yards. We found that this timidity +was customary during the nesting season, when the birds were encountered +away from the immediate vicinity of the nest.</p> + +<p>At 8 o’clock on the evening of June 24 I climbed to the crest of a sharp ridge +of one of the lower spurs of the main Alaskan Range. As I reached the highest +peak four surf birds flew in from a distance. As they circled about the peak +they called, <i>tee, tee teet</i> loudly. Their flight was swift and plover-like. As +they turned the white basal portions of their tails together with the white +bars of their wings formed four white V’s which stood out vividly in the +strong glow of the evening sun. They circled the peak several times, calling +loudly and evidently seeking for others of their kind. Soon there was an +answering call from the ground and the four birds settled down on a rocky +spur where three other surf birds were already feeding. When I crawled up +to within 50 yards of them all seven birds ceased feeding and began to call +loudly. After a period of several minutes they began to feed again, one +remaining on guard while the others ran hither and thither chasing insects +over the rocks and tundra.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Florence M. Bailey (1916) says of the behavior of surf birds on +the California coast:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At high tide one day two of the surf birds were standing on the sand ridge +just above the water resting from their labors, one with its back to the incoming +waves staring ahead of it as if lost in reverie. On the beach one of the +silent, solitary <i>Aphrizas</i> would often stand facing me, as if studying me intently, +when, though I could not read its innermost thoughts, I had a good chance to +note its light forehead and eye line, its white underparts, and streaked chest. +Two of the droll birds were found one day engaged in an amusing performance +that suggested the sparring of boys. One turned sideways to the other as if +on guard, then dropped the wing on that side and spread its tail till the white +rump showed. The other in turn spread its tail and they hopped over each +other, doing this a number of times. They would also dip their bills menacingly, +and one of them sat down several times as part of the play. As they +flew off they gave their wild <i>key-wé-ah</i>.</p> + +<p>When wanting to move down the beach one often flew close along under the +green wall of the combing surf. When it alit its wings would be held out +for an instant showing the clear white line down their length and the broad +white base of the tail with the dusky tip. When on shore they stood around +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_276">[Pg 276]</span>so much with their preoccupied dreamy gaze that, when one took wing and +flew with swift strong wing strokes out across the surf and over the ocean, +a disappearing white spot, you stood bewildered. Your idle dreamer was a +child of the sea! Perhaps when it stood on the sandy beach with preoccupied +gaze it was dreaming of its rocky surf-dashed home to the north, or of its rocky +surf-dashed winter home to the south. How well its wild, keen, plaintive +<i>key-ah-wee</i> tells the story!</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—While standing on rocks, at a distance or when the +light is poor, surf birds might be mistaken for black turnstones, but +they are somewhat larger. They are more stockily built and generally +darker colored than other shore birds. But in flight they may be +easily recognized by the broad white band in the wing, and by the +white upper tail coverts and basal half of the tail; they lack the +broad white patch in the center of the back and white stripes, which +distinguish the turnstones.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The birds apparently leave their breeding grounds in July +and move down to the coast of Alaska; some reach Oregon before +the end of July and California early in August. Apparently the +adults come first. Young birds have been taken on the coast of +southern Alaska as early as August 27 and have been noted at St. +Michael up to the last of September. During the fall they move +gradually down the coast, lingering for the winter at favorable +places.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—The surf bird winters in small numbers, occasionally if +not regularly, as far north as Wrangell, Alaska. Carl Lien has sent +me the following notes from the coast of Washington:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Destruction Island lies 50 miles south of Cape Flattery and 3 out from the +mainland. It is 35 acres in extent and surrounded by extensive reefs which +are uncovered at low tide. There are numerous rocky ridges that are well +above the water at high tide, these ridges forming little protected bays and +harbors.</p> + +<p>I first went to this island in December, 1910. On nice days when the sea +was smooth it was my custom to row around the reefs observing the birds. +I found the surf birds generally in company with Aleutian sandpipers and +black turnstones. There would be a half dozen on this reef and similar +bunches on neighboring reefs. Their actions were very lively, now running to a +higher point on the rock as the wash from the swell came rushing up, now +running down again as the water receded, feeding busily. The only thing I +ever found in their stomachs was small mussels about an eighth of an inch +long, occasionally up to a quarter of an inch. The following autumn they +returned though I did not note the date. I saw them from time to time during +the winter in the winters of 1912–13, 1913–14, 1914–15, 1915–16, 1916–17. They +would arrive the last week in October or the first week in November. The +flock on its first arrival would number about 200 birds. They would begin to +leave the island the 1st of April and by the 1st of May there would be none +left. They did not visit the high parts of the island but confined themselves +to the reefs and gravel bars. They were very wary and hard to approach on +foot though they would sometimes allow a boat to come within 10 yards.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_277">[Pg 277]</span></p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Western North and South America.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The breeding range of the surf bird is evidently +in the higher mountains of the interior of Alaska. The nest and +eggs have been found on one occasion only, in the Mount McKinley +district (Dixon, 1927), but Murie (1924) found young, apparently +about a week old, at the headwaters of Forty-mile River. There +also seems a strong probability that the species breeds in the Selawik +Range on the south side of the Kowak Valley (Grinnell, 1900), +and in the region around the head of the Savage River in the +Alaska Range (Murie, 1924).</p> + +<p>Sharing a trait with other shore birds, some nonbreeders frequently +remain through the summer at points far south of the breeding +grounds. During this period they have been noted in California +(Santa Barbara and the Farallone Islands); Oregon (Newport); +and Washington (Destruction Island and Camp Mora, Clallam +County).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—In winter the surf bird is found on the Pacific +coast both of North and South America. It has been detected +south to the Straits of Magellan (Van Island in Trinity Channel), +and at other points on the coast of Chile (Valdivia, Paposo, and +Atacama); and Peru (Pisco Bay). At this season in North America +it has been collected or observed in California (Monterey and +probably San Francisco Bay region); Oregon (Cape Meares, Cannon +Beach, and the entrance to Yaquina Bay); Washington (Jefferson +County and Destruction Island); and Alaska (Wrangel and +Craig). These latter records would appear to indicate that some +individuals are only partially migratory.</p> + +<p><i>Migration.</i>—Because of the extensive areas that may be occupied +by the species, particularly in winter, and in view of the scarcity +of existing data, it is difficult to present an adequate picture of its +migrations. The following dates may, however, throw some light on +its movements.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of arrival are Lower California, +San Geronimo Island, March 15; California, San Diego, March 19; +Oregon, Newport, March 21; Washington, Puget Sound, March 8; +and Alaska, Admiralty Island, April 17, Forrester Island, April 20, +Kuiu Island, April 25, Craig, May 9, and Kobuk River, May 29.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departure are Chile, Van Island, March 3; +Lower California, San Geronimo Island, April 13, Turtle Bay, April +14, and Abreojos Point, April 19; California, Los Angeles, May 1, +Santa Barbara, May 4, Point Pinos, May 10, and San Nicolas Island, +May 15; Oregon, Newport, May 3; and Washington, Jefferson +County, April 28.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_278">[Pg 278]</span></p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of fall arrival are: Alaskan coast, +Sitka, July 21, and Nushagak, August 9; British Columbia, Porcher +Island, July 12, and Queen Charlotte Islands, August 2; Oregon, +Newport, July 24; and California, Monterey Bay, August 3, and +Point Pinos, August 5.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Alaska, Craig, September 4, +Sitka, September 5, and Nome, September 9; British Columbia, +Comox, September 2; Oregon, Netarts Bay, November 19; and +California, Berkeley, October 24.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Alaska: One record, May 28, 1926.</p> + +<div class="chapter" id="Turnstone"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">ARENARIA INTERPRES</span> <span class="smaller">(Linnaeus)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">TURNSTONE</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The above species is cosmopolitan; it has a circumpolar breeding +range, and its migrations extend over nearly all of the Northern +Hemisphere and a large part of the Southern. It has been split into +two, or possibly three, geographical races. In the author’s opinion +only two races should be recognized; the Palaearctic form, <i>interpres</i>, +averages slightly larger, and is decidedly darker, the black predominating +over the rufous on the upper parts; the Nearctic form, +<i>morinella</i>, averages slightly smaller, is decidedly lighter, the rufous +predominating on the upper parts; these two races are well marked +and are generally recognized. The Pacific race has been described +under the name <i>oahuensis</i>, from specimens taken on Oahu Island in +the Hawaiian group. It is supposed to breed in Alaska and spend +the winter in the Hawaiian and other Pacific islands. It seems to +be strictly intermediate, both in size and color, between <i>interpres</i> +and <i>morinella</i>. Some of the best authorities have not recognized it +in nomenclature, which seems to be a wise course. For the purpose of +this life history the species as a whole will be considered.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The northward migration of the ruddy turnstone +through the United States is accomplished mainly during May, but +many linger along through the first week in June. I have seen turnstones +in Louisiana as late as June 17 and 23, but some that I shot +were immature birds, apparently 1 year old, which probably would +not breed that season. Arthur T. Wayne (1910) has seen high +plumaged birds in South Carolina on June 11 and 12, which were +doubtless late migrants; but he says that birds in immature or winter +plumage are seen in June more frequently than adults. These +latter illustrate the well-established fact that many shore birds do +not attain their full plumage and do not breed during their first year, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_279">[Pg 279]</span>but remain within their winter ranges or far south of their breeding +ranges all summer.</p> + +<p>Many observers have stated that turnstones do not migrate in +large flocks in the spring, but I have seen some very large flocks on +Cape Cod containing several hundred. On the coast of New Jersey +during the latter part of May, 1927, we saw a wonderful flight of this +and other shore birds; on the 20th we counted 3,600 turnstones, on +the 26th 4,500, on the 27th 5,000, and on the 28th 7,000; many of +these were in immense flocks of this species only, but more often they +were associated in large flocks with black-bellied plovers; one enormous +flock of the two species was estimated to contain 3,500 birds.</p> + +<p>The main migration route is along the sea coast. Migrants have +been known to reach Massachusetts as early as May 1, and my latest +date is June 5; but the main flight comes during the latter half of +May. Dr. W. Elmer Ekblaw tells me that it reaches its breeding +grounds in northwestern Greenland during the first week in June.</p> + +<p>There is a regular migration northward through the interior, but +in much smaller numbers. Pierce Brodkorb and Frank Grasett give +me dates for northeastern Illinois from April 30 to June 18. We collected +specimens in Nelson County, N. Dak., on June 5, and at Lake +Winnipegosis, Manitoba, on June 1 and 2; but we did not record the +species at all during the two seasons spent in southwestern Saskatchewan. +Prof. William Rowan tells me that it is rare in his +section of Alberta. The route is evidently northward from Manitoba +through the Athabaska-Mackenzie region. Samuel F. Rathbun +has sent me the following notes on the former abundance of turnstones +in Manitoba:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In that Province we spent the greater part of the spring and summer of 1889, +and on one occasion went to Lake Manitoba driving as directly as possible +across what was then an unsettled country. We clambered up one of the +dunes and looked over its top, and right in front of us and up and down the +beach almost as far as could be seen, were countless numbers of shore birds. +On the sands nearly all of these were in constant motion, while over the surface +of the lake flocks were flying to and fro. By far the greater number of the +birds were turnstones and the flocks of these were always very large. I +hesitate to give my estimate of the number seen, but I made many counts and +forming a rough guess from these judged at the time that there must have been +somewhere near eight or ten thousand of the turnstones. And I have always +believed this estimate to be somewhere near correct. This was on the 30th +of May and it may have been that we were fortunate to have happened to +witness the height of the movement of these birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The ruddy turnstone is a rather uncommon migrant on the Pacific +coast in April and May. Mr. Rathbun says in his notes that it—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>appears to be a regular spring migrant along the ocean coast of Washington, +first being seen in early May. The earlier birds seem to arrive in small numbers, +to be followed by flocks of fair size, but at no time are the turnstones +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_280">[Pg 280]</span>as common as are most of the other species of shore birds that migrate along +the coast.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>From its winter home in Australia the turnstone makes an early +start for its long flight over the ocean; W. B. Alexander tells me that +his latest record is of a pair seen April 25, 1914, on the estuary of the +Lost River on the south coast of western Australia. The Pacific form +of the turnstone has been named <i>oahuensis</i> from a specimen taken on +the island where Honolulu is situated. The birds leave the Hawaiian +Islands in May and probably make a 2,000-mile flight over the Pacific +Ocean to the Commander and Aleutian Islands. Dr. Leonhard Stejneger +(1885) says that they make their appearance in the Commanders +“early in May (in 1883 the first ones were observed on the 7th), and +the beach, especially on the north shore of Bering Island, fairly +swarms with them. In June they disappear, and only a few remain +during the summer.” In his notes from Hooper Bay, Alaska, H. B. +Conover says: “On May 15 Du Fresne shot the first bird of this +species. He had found it sitting humped up on a log showing through +the snow. The next day a pair was seen, and after that date they +were noticed constantly. On May 28 the migration still must have +been going on, as a flock of about 20 was seen mixed with 6 golden +plover.”</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—Doctor Ekblaw has sent me the following notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The ruddy turnstone is almost if not quite as common as the ringed plover +along the beaches and about the gravelly moraines and terraces of northwest +Greenland. It comes to the land the first week in June, frequenting the drifts +of kelp along the shore when the ice foot has melted away. There they probe +about the shells and seaweed, turning the long drifts over to a depth of +3 inches. Where they have worked, the shore looks as if a drove of tiny pigs +had rooted about.</p> + +<p>They begin mating as soon as they arrive, and many a bitter struggle and +amorous courtship takes place among these birds during the first two weeks of +June. The males outnumber the females, so the rivalry is keen. As the lowering +sun of the day sinks nearest the midnight horizon the wooing antics are at the +height. Frequently two males pursue the same female, seeking to win her favor, +the while they are combating one another for the advantage. In giddy, reckless +flight they sweep back and forth along the shore, rarely rising more than 3 feet +above the beach, usually but a foot. When alighted the pursuit is just as eager, +the female racing about to escape the insistent attentions of the males, the +males eagerly pursuing her and struggling between themselves for supremacy. +The more pugnacious usually wins out, though the other never gives up hope.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The Rev. F. C. R. Jourdain contributes the following notes on the +subject:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>A study of the published records of the breeding habits of the turnstone +discloses the fact that practically nothing has ever been written on the courtship +and song of this species. The only apparent exception is a passage by +A. Trevor-Battye (1895), who says: “This lovely bird has a far more elaborate +song than that of any wader I know. You really may call it a song. I put +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_281">[Pg 281]</span>it down at the time as <i>chewah, chewah, chewecki, ki-ki-ki kee kee</i>, and he sings +it <i>con amore</i> from any little mound.” My first experience with the turnstone +dates back to 1921, when with Mr. A. H. Paget Wilkes we found the nests of +some 19 pairs in Spitsbergen. It was then late in the breeding season; every +pair had incubated eggs or young, but directly one arrived within range of a +breeding pair the cock would fly out to meet us and greet us with his little +challenge song. As a rule attempts to describe the notes of birds by means of +letters are chiefly remarkable for their discrepancies, but if Mr. Paget Wilkes’s +version of the “attack note” is compared with that of Mr. Trevor-Battye, the +resemblance is striking, <i>tche-wick ... tsche-wick, tche-wi-i-i-i-i-i-ck</i>. Obviously +the two “songs” are the same, yet we heard this challenge daily from birds +far advanced in incubation and even with newly hatched young. It continued +as long as we remained in the neighborhood of the nest, and was sometimes +repeated in a weaker form by the female. When the young were being brooded +by the male and the female was on guard this challenge note was uttered by +her. There is, of course, a strong element of challenge in all bird song, and +the turnstone is a born fighter. No foe is too formidable to be attacked and +driven off. It is most amusing to see a male chasing a bird ten times as big +as himself and returning complacently to his sentry duty until the approach of +another probable enemy brings him again to the attack.</p> + +<p>There is little doubt that all the “singing” males met with by Trevor-Battye +were really breeding birds defending the territories and, as they fondly +imagined, driving him away. Of course the cheery little <i>chirrup</i> of the turnstone +has no claim to musical excellence in spite of Trevor-Battye’s exaggerated +praise; no one could possibly compare it to the sweet wild notes of the curlew +or even the flutelike notes of the purple sandpiper. Apparently in this species +the fighting instinct has replaced the tendency to display on the wing before +the female; and while many other waders utter musical notes during the love +flight the turnstone reserves his for the attack.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Comparatively few nests of the ruddy turnstone have +ever been found, as the bird nests in the far north, where few ornithologists +have been. A set of three eggs in my collection, taken by +Capt. Joseph Bernard on Taylor Island, Victoria Land, on August 1, +1917, possibly a second laying, was in a hollow on the tundra. MacFarlane +found only two sets on the lower Anderson River, which +were precisely similar to those of the other waders, consisting of a +few withered leaves placed in a depression in the ground, each containing +four eggs. Eggs collected by Rev. A. R. Hoare at Point +Hope, Alaska, were laid “in depressions on mossy ridges of the +tundra.” Herbert W. Brandt has sent me the following notes on +the nesting habits of these birds in Alaska:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>At Hooper Bay the ruddy turnstone like the indigenous plovers is an open-nesting +bird and it depends for concealment of its eggs upon the similarity of +the shell coloration to its surroundings. Near a limpid pool in the low-rolling +dunes the bird makes a shallow, circular depression in the brownish green, +velvetlike moss and this it lines, haphazardly, with a few moss stems and often +with small crisp leaves of low-creeping woody plants. The range of measurements +of five nests is: Inside diameter, 3¾ to 4½ inches; inside depth, 1 to +1½ inches; and depth over all is 1 to 1¾ inches. The pied parents follow the +habits of the open-nesting birds, for they are wild and unapproachable while +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_282">[Pg 282]</span>breeding; so that in spite of its exposed location the nest is anything but easy +to find. Incubation patches were present on both sexes and they did not employ, +to lure the intruder from the nesting area, the usual wounded tactics +of the other shore birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In the Eastern Hemisphere numerous nests have been found and +considerable has been published on the subject. Henry J. Pearson +(1904), during his three summers in Russian Lapland, found several +nests of the turnstone. On June 13, 1899, on Little Heno Island, he +found a nest with four fresh eggs on a low sand spit. “The nest +was placed in a patch of dwarf sallow, 10 inches high, and near the +edge of a bank, the slight depression being lined with a few dry +grasses and dead leaves.” Another nest was found on June 27 on +Great Heno. After watching the bird in vain for a long time on +“a bare stretch of peat, with scarcely a scrap of vegetation and full +of puffin holes,” they returned the next day and flushed the turnstone +out of a puffin hole; “and there was a nest 18 inches from the mouth, +containing three eggs more than half incubated; a few dead sorrel +stalks had been taken in to form the nest.” On June 19, 1901, on +Medveji Island, a nest was found “placed under a large overhanging +shelf of peat, in such a position that the bird could slip on and +off in two different directions according to that from which danger +was threatened. The young were formed in the four incubated +eggs.” He refers to two other nests found on a sand spit, which +were “on the open ground with no protection beyond a few blades +of grass.”</p> + +<p>W. C. Hewitson (1856) found a nest on the coast of Norway on +“a flat rock, bare except where here and there grew tufts of grass, +or stunted juniper clinging to its surface”; the nest “was placed +against a ledge of the rock, and consisted of nothing more than the +drooping leaves of the juniper bush, under a creeping branch of which +the eggs, four in number, were snugly concealed.”</p> + +<p>A number of nests of the turnstone were found by the Oxford +expedition to Spitsbergen, about which A. H. Paget-Wilkes (1922) +has given us considerable information. He says that “in spite of +the presence of large and small boulders and stones the turnstone in +Spitsbergen does not lay its eggs under the shelter of this somewhat +scanty cover or in the small holes or pockets in the soil, but chooses +perfectly open and bare, wind-swept places for its breeding sites.” +Some seven nests were found on islands and one of these is described +as “a very flat depression among small stones on a small ridge of +dry, red mud.” Other nests were scattered along the shore at intervals +of about three-quarters of a mile; but in one place five or +six pairs were nesting within a radius of half a mile. One nest was +on a little island of hard mud, only three yards by two yards in +a stream. The turnstones are very active and aggressive in defending +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_283">[Pg 283]</span>their nests against the jaegers; these marauders are persistently +harried, desperately attacked, and finally driven away.</p> + +<p>Ralph Chislett (1925) gives an interesting account of finding the +turnstone breeding on a Baltic isle, where the nests were hidden +among the dense herbage. He says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Against the sky, not more than 30 yards away, appearing over the top of a +rise in the ground, as seen from the hiding tent, was a group of chervil flower +heads. One of the turnstones, on taking wing, flew directly to these flower +heads and appeared to settle in the midst of them. After giving the bird time +to get settled on the eggs (I hoped) I crawled out of the tent, and keeping +low was within 6 yards of the chervil clump when the turnstone took wing +from a point 2 yards on the other side, repeating its cry much more meaningly +than hitherto. I had been prepared to find the nest under shelter of some +sort, but had not expected the eggs to be so completely hidden from view as +proved to be the case here. The nest lay on the seaward side of the clump. +To obtain a view for the camera, a tall chervil stalk, some leaves, and grasses +had to be removed. The definite scrape was lined with bits of seaweed and +dry grass stems to a depth of more than 1 inch.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—Mr. Brandt has sent me the following good description of +the turnstone’s eggs collected by his party in Alaska:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The ruddy turnstone lays four eggs and these may justly claim rank as some +of the handsomest of all the delightful Hooper Bay limicoline series. They are +subpyriform to ovate in shape and lie points together in the shallow nest. +The shell is glossy and smooth and is quite strong. The markings seldom +cover more than half the area of the eggs and in consequence the ground color +is prominent. The latter is quite variable, ranging from “yellowish glaucous” +to “olive buff” and even “deep olive buff.” The surface markings are usually +bold and are most heavily concentrated on the larger end, but one striking +type is known for its beautiful marbled effect as the spots which are large and +clouded softly fade into the glossy ground color. These spots are irregular +in outline and are often slightly elongate, twisting into a pronounced clockwise +spiral. The usual color of the primary spots is “warm sepia,” but in the +greenish setting they are “olive brown” while in the marbled type “citrine +drab” is the prevailing shade. When the underlying markings are given +prominence their soft tones add to the beauty of the eggs. The colors of these +partially hidden ornaments range from “pale mouse gray” to “mouse gray.” +The additional markings of brownish black to black are sparsely scattered +over the larger part of the egg usually in the form of small spots or pen-like +scratches. The vitality of the shore birds is attested by the fact that four turnstone’s +eggs laid in four days weigh 2½ ounces, while the parent bird herself +weighs but 3½ ounces.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Most of the turnstone’s eggs that I have seen are easily recognizable, +though the distinctive features are more easily seen than described. +The markings are usually quite evenly distributed and the egg well +covered with them. The 12 eggs so well illustrated on Frank +Poynting’s (1895) beautiful plate, all taken from European eggs, +show some variations not mentioned by Mr. Brandt. The buffy +ground colors range from “dark olive buff” to “olive buff”; and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_284">[Pg 284]</span>greenish ones from “water green” to “yellowish glaucous.” One +plain-looking egg is “dark olive buff” with faint markings of a +slightly darker shade. Another is “water green” with numerous, +small, almost black spots, and underlying small spots of “light mouse +gray.” The measurements of 100 European eggs furnished by the +Rev. F. C. R. Jourdain, average 40.5 by 29.2 millimeters; the eggs +showing the four extremes measure <b>44.5</b> by 30.4, 43.2 by <b>31.3</b>, <b>36</b> by +28.2 and 40.5 by <b>26</b> millimeters. Mr. Brandt’s 44 eggs, from Alaska, +average slightly smaller, 39 by 28 millimeters; the extremes of his +and all other American and Greenland eggs that I have measurements +of fall within the limits given above for European eggs. Egg +measurements would seem to indicate that Alaska birds should be +referred to <i>morinella</i>, the smaller race.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—The period of incubation does not seem to be known, but +it is a well-established fact that both sexes share in this duty, as well +as in the care of the young. Mr. Paget-Wilkes (1922) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Both sexes incubate, but when the eggs are fresh or partly incubated the hen +seems to brood and the cock stands on guard. When the eggs were within a day +or two of hatching or were just chipping we invariably found the cock incubating, +and when the young were out we always found the cock looking after the +family and the hen, with her duller plumage and weaker notes, on guard. +These characteristics observed in the cases of 19 pairs should form a useful +basis for further research.</p> + +<p>On flushing the cock bird from four young in down on the Mouettes Islands +I was shown an example of his tenacity and intelligence. I had taken the young +birds away in my pocket and had run back to the boat across a neck of land +some 300 yards broad. The cock chased me a little way and then disappeared. +On reaching the sea, however, on the other side of the small peninsula, I immediately +saw the cock fly around the point and make straight for me, and he +stood and chattered at me until we rowed away in the boat. The hen put in +no appearance at all.</p> + +<p>Again, on one of the islands we watched a pair whose behavior puzzled us, +but soon discovered that there were four young birds being looked after by the +cock. The moment he was flushed the young birds scattered in all directions, +and on our lying down again came back under the fatherly wing. Before I +discovered that the cock incubated in the last stages I patiently watched a hen +running about quite unconcernedly for almost an hour, and then suddenly +jumped to the conclusion that the cock was sitting. When I got up the hen +gave the alarm note and I flushed the cock from four chipping eggs.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>A. L. V. Manniche (1910) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The parents are very watchful against danger in the breeding time and when +the young ones are small. One of them will keep a lookout from the summit of +a large stone or a rock while the other is brooding or guiding the young ones. +The bird on guard will discover an approaching enemy at an incredibly long +distance and rush toward him uttering furious cries. Especially the skua +(<i>Lestris longicauda</i>) is a detested enemy of the turnstone. Every day I could +observe the hunting skuas pursued by turnstones. When one pursuer returned +to its district another would appear and thus every skua was almost always +accompanied by at least one turnstone. Also toward the polar fox the turnstones +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_285">[Pg 285]</span>would betray great fear, and they would often join from afar and swoop +down on the hated enemy, uttering their sharpest and most violent cries.</p> + +<p>Toward the end of July the young ones were able to fly but were, however, +generally accompanied by the old female. The young ones would often resort +to the upper part of rather high rocks while the old female incessantly crying +and anxiously flapping tried to divert my attention from them. When the old +female had left her offspring and the country, these would immediately take +to the coast and the mouths of rivers like other young waders.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The young turnstone in natal down is not brilliantly, +yet distinctively, colored. The upper parts, including the sides of +the head and neck, wings and thighs, vary from “cream buff” or +“chamois” on the crown and wings to “olive buff” on the neck and +flanks. The crown, back, wings, rump, and thighs are heavily spotted +or broadly striped with black; the center of the crown is largely +black and so are the lores; a broad space above the eyes and the +forehead are “cream buff,” with a black streak in the middle of the +latter. There is some whitish in the center of the back and the entire +under parts are pure white.</p> + +<p>In full juvenal plumage, Alaska birds in July, the crown and +mantle are dark sepia or blackish brown, the feathers of the crown +edged with sandy brown, those of the back broadly edged with +“pinkish buff” or “cream buff” and the wing coverts still more +broadly edged with “cinnamon buff”; the tertials are edged with +“cinnamon”; the feathers of the rump, the tail coverts, and the tail +are tipped with a buffy wash; the under parts are similar in pattern +to those of the adult, but the black patches are browner and often +show buffy tips. The sexes are practically alike in juvenal and +winter plumages.</p> + +<p>The first winter plumage is acquired by a partial body molt between +August and November; it can be distinguished from the adult +winter plumage by the presence of some retained tertials, scapulars, +and wing coverts; also it is not so uniformly dark as the adult, is +more streaked with buffy and whitish edgings on the head, neck, and +back, and it has less black in the gorget. The two races are distinguishable +in this plumage, <i>interpres</i> being darker.</p> + +<p>The first prenuptial molt begins in January; it is similar to that +of the adult but is much less complete. I have seen a young bird in +full wing molt in January and think that young birds renew their +flight feathers before the first spring. The first nuptial plumage +is, I believe, a nonbreeding plumage, as it is worn by birds which +spend the summer far south of the breeding range. I have seen +birds in this plumage, collected in Florida and Louisiana, in every +month from April to August. This plumage resembles the adult +nuptial, but the head is more streaked with dusky or black; and +in the mantle, scapulars and wing coverts there is a mixture of new +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_286">[Pg 286]</span>rufous feathers and both old and new blackish brown feathers. The +sexes are recognizable in this plumage, the males being much +brighter. A complete molt in August produces the adult winter +plumage.</p> + +<p>Adults have a complete postnuptial molt, from July to October, +but mainly in August, when the wings are molted. They have a +partial prenuptial molt from February to June, mainly in March +and April, involving the body plumage, but not all the scapulars +or wing coverts.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The turnstone is mainly a maritime species and its favorite +feeding grounds are the stony and sandy beaches along the seashore +and the rocky promontories and islets on the coasts. But on its +inland migrations it finds its food on the shores and beaches of the +larger lakes and rivers. The turnstone derives its name from its +well-known and conspicuous habit of turning over, with its short, +stout bill and sturdy muscles, stones, shells, clods of earth, seaweed, +and other objects in search for the dainty morsels of animal food +that it finds beneath them. If the object is not too large the bird +stoops down and overturns it with a quick jerk of the head and neck; +but against a larger obstacle it places its breast and pushes with all +its strength; it is surprising to see how large a stone or clod it can +move. It also has a peculiar habit of rooting like a pig in piles of +seaweed or in the open sand. Windrows of seaweed and other rubbish +are generally full of sand fleas and various worms and insects and +their larvae, where the turnstones and other waders find an abundant +feast. Frank T. Noble (1904) has described this very well, as +follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>He would select a likely spot on the loosely packed moss and go at his work +with a vim and rapidity entirely different from the other species. Underneath +the bits of weed, moss, and fragments of shell his sharp upturned bill would +swiftly go and a perfect shower of these would soon be falling in front and +beside him. Finding a morsel to his taste he would devour it in much less time +than it takes to relate it, and the rooting and tossing of the bits into the air +would continue. At times quite sizeable fragments of shell and pieces of moss +more than an inch in length would be thrown fully 7 or 8 inches above the bird’s +head, and this he would keep up, with scarcely an instant’s pause, for a quarter +of an hour and until he had excavated a pit large enough to almost conceal his +plump, mottled body. Occasionally he would turn about in his tracks, but as a +rule he worked in one direction.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>I have seen a similar method employed on a sand flat laid bare at +low tide, where four or five turnstones were feeding, accompanied by +sanderlings and peeps. The turnstones were digging holes in the +wet sand, throwing out the sand for a distance of several inches, +until the holes were big enough to admit the whole of a man’s fist +and deep enough to conceal the bird’s head and neck. Meantime the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_287">[Pg 287]</span>sanderlings were standing close by and picking up some small objects +thrown out, until driven away by savage attacks of the turnstone. +On close examination I found a number of small, black snails and +other minute mollusks in the sand thrown out. The stomach of one +shot contained only the minute mollusks and some coarse sand.</p> + +<p>Doctor Stejneger (1885) found turnstones feeding in large numbers +on the killing grounds in the Commander Islands, “where thousands +of putrified carcasses of the slain fur seals swarm with myriads of +the white larvae of the flesh fly,” on which they grow very fat. +Francis H. Allen tells me he has seen them feeding on rocks which +are bare only at low tide and covered with barnacles. One that he +watched—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>sometimes simply picked its food up from among the barnacles and rockweed, +and sometimes it hammered away in one spot like a woodpecker before getting +its morsel. The object hammered was evidently fixed. After the bird had +flown, I visited the spot and found many empty barnacle shells—empty of barnacles, +that is—some entirely empty and others containing small snail-like +mollusks with dark-colored shells.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>On the coast of South Carolina I have seen turnstones feeding on +the beds of coon oysters and have watched them busily engaged in +chasing the small fiddler crabs on the muddy banks of tidal creeks +and on the mud lumps; they had to run very fast to catch the spry +little animals and probably had to pick out the smallest ones. Mr. +Wayne (1910) says: “On Capers Island it frequents live oak trees +which are covered with small mussels, upon which it eagerly feeds. +If some of the mussels happen to be on an inclined limb the birds +walk, instead of flying, to reach them. I have seen as many as four +of these, one behind the other, on a small limb out in the surf.”</p> + +<p>Mr. Manniche (1910) says that just after their arrival in Greenland +the turnstones feed mainly on vegetable food; the stomach of a +bird taken on May 22 contained only remains of plants. Dr. Paul +Bartsch (1922), referring to his visit to Midway Island, writes: “It +was a decided surprise to us to find waders in bushes feeding upon +berries, and yet this was the case here. Again and again we flushed +bunches of turnstones from the dense <i>Scaevola</i> thickets and watched +them circle about for some time, only to realight in the tops of another +clump of bushes. Specimens shot on Sand Island were filled +with <i>Scaevola</i> berries.”</p> + +<p>C. J. Maynard (1896) says that they sometimes resort to marshes +and feed on grasshoppers. Their main food supply evidently consists +of small crustaceans, small mollusks, insects, and their larvae, +all of which they consume in large quantities and in great variety. +In Massachusetts it is sometimes called the “horse-foot snipe,” because +of its fondness for the eggs of the horse-foot crab. John T. +Nichols tells me that it scratches up the eggs by “jumping in the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_288">[Pg 288]</span>air and striking with both its feet at once into the sand, thus making +a hole about 3 inches deep and 1½ inches across.”</p> + +<p>Dr. Alexander Wetmore contributes the following interesting +notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The greatest surprise came when on Laysan Island it was found that these +and other shore birds were persistent enemies of the sooty and gray-backed +terns, as they destroyed the eggs of the terns at every opportunity. +For the first few days when turnstones were seen greedily eating terns’ +eggs I supposed that they were merely finishing eggs that had been opened +by other birds, but on further observation found that these shore birds were +bold marauders that drove their bills into the eggs of terns at every opportunity +and were only prevented from attacking the nests of boobies and +man-o-war birds by the fact that the shell of the egg in these species was +so hard that they could not break it. As we moved through the great colonies +of sooty terns the birds near at hand rose before us from their eggs, often +communicating the alarm to neighbors so that at times clouds of birds arose +to fill the air. At our heels, 15 or 20 feet behind us, came little groups of +turnstones well aware that this uproar among the sharp-beaked terns meant +unprotected nests, where they could attack the eggs with impunity. The +turnstones ran quickly about driving their bills into the eggs without the +slightest hesitation, breaking open the side widely and feeding eagerly on the +contents, sometimes two or three gathering for an instant to demolish one egg +and then with this one half consumed running on to attack another. The +havoc wrought among the terns was so great that we forbade the sailors from +approaching the colonies, and made it a rule among the naturalists to keep +away except when necessity for some observation made it imperative to disturb +the birds.</p> + +<p>The densely packed colonies of aggressive sooty terns were open to attack +mainly along the borders except when the birds were disturbed, but the little +scattered groups of gray-backed terns (<i>Sterna lunata</i>) on the open beaches +were entirely at the mercy of the turnstones, so that it seemed that the gentle +terns could not hope for a successful nesting until the close of May carried the +horde of their marauding persecutors away to northern homes. So bold were +the shore birds that on one occasion I saw two actually push aside the +feathers on the sides of the incubating tern, drag her egg from beneath her +breast, and proceed to open and devour it within 6 inches of the nest. The +tern remained in incubating pose, plainly troubled by such unexpected boldness +but seemingly not comprehending its portent, nodding her head with that of +her mate standing beside her, and finally reaching out to draw the half-empty +shell of her treasure again beneath her, while the robbers, temporarily satisfied, +pattered away in search of other prey. On several occasions when, in walking +along the beaches above high-tide mark I flushed gray-backed terns from +their nests, I saw that they carried with them as they flew away shells of +broken eggs, which not understanding that they had been destroyed they had +covered while the hardening albumen flowing over the outside of the shell +had glued the whole to their feathers.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The Rev. F. C. R. Jourdain contributes the following notes on the +food of this species:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>As it is almost invariably found near the coast the food is chiefly marine +in character: Mollusca, chiefly small univalves such as <i>Litorina</i> (L. Florence +records 134 opercula of small molluscks); small Crustacea, especially Gammaridae; +A. H. Clark records fry of a small fish (<i>Sicydium plumieri</i>) +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_289">[Pg 289]</span>up to 1½ inches in length; insects, including Coleoptera, Diptera (<i>Tipulidae</i> +and larvae of <i>Chironomidae</i>), Lepidoptera (<i>Argynnis charidea</i> and <i>Dasychira +groenlandica</i>) recorded by H. C. Hart and <i>Hymenoptera</i>. Also Arachnida +and Acaridea (Feilden). Also some vegetable matter (seeds of <i>Draba alpina</i>, +pieces of seaweed, etc.).</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—When migrating turnstones fly in large flocks by themselves +or with black-bellied plovers, often in immense flocks; at such +times they usually fly high. But, while sojourning on the way, they +are usually in small numbers and very often seen singly. One or two +birds are often associated with mixed flocks or scattered gatherings +of semipalmated plover, sanderlings, or other small waders. Their +flight is strong, swift, and steady, usually direct, but sometimes in a +semicircle, out from the shore and back again; when not traveling +they generally fly low. There is something peculiar about their flight +which can be recognized at a long distance, but I can not describe it +satisfactorily. They are essentially shore birds, frequenting the stony, +rocky, or sandy beaches of the seashore or the larger lakes. They +are not particularly shy, and sometimes very tame. When they first +alight they stand and survey the landscape until sure that they are +safe. They then mingle freely with the other small waders, feeding +unconcernedly, and treating their companions with indifference until +one comes too near. Then the turnstone shows its jealous and pugnacious +disposition; it will allow no competition, in the spot where +it is feeding, from another bird, even of its own species, but with +lowered head, drooping wings, and hunched up back it rushes at the +intruder in a threatening attitude and perhaps gives him a few jabs +with its sharp bill. Many a miniature cockfight or sham battle is +enacted and the turnstone is generally the aggressor, though once I +saw a sanderling drive away a turnstone. It appears like a big bully +that is attracted to the feast that others have found and then is +unwilling to share it with them.</p> + +<p>Turnstones can swim well and probably alight on the water to +rest while making long flights over the ocean. Dr. Donald B. MacMillan +(1918) saw “a large flock alight upon the water in Kennedy +Channel.” They love to bathe in shallow water, squatting down and +fluttering their wings, sometimes partly rolling over; then they spend +much time preening and dressing their pretty plumage. N. B. +Moore says in his notes that “this species alights on the dead branches +of mangroves, stumps, and stakes that stand in the water near the +shore from 2 to 6 feet above it and sits in the manner of a Carolina +dove.”</p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—John T. Nichols has contributed the following on the +ordinary notes of the turnstone:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The common flight note of this species is an unloud polysyllabic one, something +like a cackle, which does not carry far. It is usually given by birds that +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_290">[Pg 290]</span>are leaving the vicinity, but not so frequently heard at other times as are the +flight notes of various species. This note is sometimes three syllabled, <i>ketakek</i>, +or may be of a single syllable, <i>kek</i>, on taking wing. A much rarer, loud, plover-like +<i>kik-kyu</i> has been heard from a turnstone when coming to decoys or flying +along the edge of favorable marshes. The cackle of the turnstone is almost +impossible to imitate, but they will decoy readily to a whistled imitation of the +cry of their associate the black-bellied plover.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The song of the turnstone as heard on its breeding grounds few +have been privileged to hear. Mr. Brandt calls it “a loud but not +unpleasant note, rapidly repeated—<i>kye-ute-cat-tat-tah</i>.” Mr. Jourdain +has given us, under courtship, his impressions of it and those of +Messrs. Trevor-Battye and Paget-Wilkes.</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—The turnstone is a conspicuous and well-marked +bird, not likely to be mistaken for anything else. It is a stout, short-legged +bird with a short neck and a short, straight bill. In its +brilliant spring plumage the white head, black throat, red legs, and +rufous back are unique field marks. But the best field marks, most +conspicuous in the nuptial plumage, but present in all plumages, +are the five white stripes on the upper surface, which show very +plainly as the bird flies away; these are a broad central stripe on the +back, separated by a black patch on the rump from the white area +in the tail, a narrow stripe on the outer edge of the scapulars and a +band across the wing on the secondaries and primaries. Unfortunately +for observers on the Pacific coast, the black turnstone has +somewhat similar white stripes, but the pattern is a little different.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—Adult turnstones begin to leave their summer homes in +Greenland about the middle of July, with the knots and sanderlings, +and before the end of August the last of the young birds have left. +Lucien M. Turner obtained an adult from Davis Inlet on July 25; +but the species apparently avoids Ungava, for the only bird he saw +there was a young male taken on August 20. Probably the birds +which breed in western Greenland migrate coastwise along the Labrador +coast and Nova Scotia to New England. We saw the first turnstones +at Cape Sable, Nova Scotia, on July 30 and 31; but my earliest +record for adults in Massachusetts is on August 1; adults are common +here all through August; the young birds come along late in +August, and I have seen them here as late as October 12.</p> + +<p>There is a heavy migration down the west coast of Hudson Bay. +Edward A. Preble (1902) saw the first turnstones at Fort Churchill +on July 30; and on August 10 to 13 he “observed many small flocks +about 25 miles south of Cape Eskimo”; August 21 to 26 he saw +“many flocks daily.” From the Hudson Bay region the main flight +seems to be southeastward through the Great Lakes region to the +Atlantic coast. It seems to be very rare in the fall west of eastern +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_291">[Pg 291]</span>Manitoba and Ohio; and it extends as far east as the Bermudas and +the West Indies.</p> + +<p>Some of the birds which breed in Alaska migrate down the Pacific +coasts of North and South America at about the same dates as the +Atlantic coast birds; but large numbers pass down the Asiatic coast, +through Japan and China, to islands in the Southern Hemisphere. +Doctor Stejneger (1885) says that in the Commander Islands during +the latter part of July large flocks return from the north.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>From this time until late autumn enormous masses of them may be seen on +the killing grounds, near the seal rookeries, where thousands of putrified carcasses +of the slain fur seals swarm with myriads of the white larvae of the +flesh fly, upon which the pretty turnstones feed and grow exceedingly fat. At +sunset they retire to the beach, where they pass the night, not, however, without +having performed a soldierlike drill by flying up and down the endless tundra, +now in full body, now again in detached divisions, and with admirable precision +turning and maneuvering as if obeying the command of a leading +officer.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>As to the migration on the Pribilof Islands, William Palmer +(1899) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On July 12, 1890, I saw probably the first bird that landed on St. Paul during +the fall migration. From that date they daily increased rapidly until by the +end of July they swarmed everywhere. They reach the island by way of the +northeastern shore and in straggling flocks or singly fly southward through the +island during the day, banking up in large numbers when the village killing +ground is reached. They spread out on the slopes, resting on the rocks and +little hillocks during the day. They soon find the feast awaiting them on the +killing ground, and the marks of their work around nearly every seal carcass +is soon noticeable. As the water disappears by soakage and evaporation in the +village pond they turn up the black sand in thousands of little hillocks, each +with a narrow depression made by their bill beside it. At low tide the lagoon +beaches are a favorite resting and feeding place. By the end of July many +become so fat that they are run down and captured by the young Aleuts. Their +departure from St. Paul is quite a feature of the avifaunan exhibition. About +6 in the evening a small flock of perhaps 40 birds will rise into the air from +about the village pond and uttering loud, shrill cries will fly up to near the +head of the lagoon. Here making a wide sweep they return, gathering fresh +recruits on their way, until the vicinity of the pond is again reached. Sweeping +around in a constantly ascending course they return up the lagoon, and turning +once more, screaming as they go, and adding to their numbers, they make a +straight course high over the village hill and on out to sea over the reef point. +This invariably took place every evening during the latter part of my stay on +the island. It was always the rule that a dense fog bank hung all around the +island at that time, so that even the reef point was not visible, but the birds +went into the fog without the slightest hesitation. They left their landmarks +behind. Several flocks averaging about a hundred birds left nearly every +evening from the end of July until I left on August 10. The first arrivals on the +island were always adults; the young were not noted for at least 10 days. +According to Elliott they all leave the islands after the 10th of September.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Many of these birds must make the 2,000-mile flight over the ocean +from the Commander or Aleutian Islands to the Hawaiian Islands. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_292">[Pg 292]</span>They have repeatedly been seen in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, +hundreds of miles from land. This does not seem so remarkable, +now that we know that they can alight and rest on the water and +rise from it easily. They must go a long time without food or find +a very scanty supply of it, as it must take 40 or 50 hours to make +the trip. But Dr. Henry W. Henshaw (1902) says that some of the +first arrivals on these islands, which he shot about the middle of +August, “were all of them plump and in fine order for the table.”</p> + +<p><i>Game.</i>—The turnstone has never attained great importance as a +game bird, though it was formerly counted in the list of “big birds” +in the gunner’s bag. It was plump and generally fat, so that it made +a good table bird. It has a variety of local names, such as chicken +plover, calico bird, brant bird, etc. It decoys well to almost any +decoys and, although its own note is difficult to imitate, it will +respond readily to the call of its favorite companion, the black-bellied +plover.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—The ruddy turnstone spends the winter on the coasts of +the southern States and on both coasts of South America, from South +Carolina to Brazil and from southern California to Chile. The +larger, Old World form, <i>interpres</i>, apparently does not winter anywhere +in the Western Hemisphere, but occupies the coasts of southern +Europe and Asia, much of Africa, some of the oceanic islands, and +Australia. If we are to recognize the Pacific form, <i>oahuensis</i>, there +is yet much to be learned about the limits of its winter and summer +ranges and where it intergrades with <i>interpres</i>. The island of Oahu +in the Hawaiian Islands is the type locality of <i>oahuensis</i>; and it +probably has a wide range among Pacific islands.</p> + +<p>Dr. Alexander Wetmore says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In the remote islands of the Hawaiian bird reservation the turnstone is +common during the period of northern winter, and a few sterile or injured +individuals may remain through the summer. Though common along the +sandy beaches and the shores of lagoons, as is usual, at times they exhibited +curious habits, as on Ocean Island they ran back from the open shore beneath +the thickets of beach magnolia (<i>Scaevola</i>), penetrating the entire island in +cover as dense as that ordinarily chosen by woodcock. It was always a surprise +when one, attracted by some sound, flew up from under the bushes and perched +on a dead branch to look at me. On Midway turnstones ran about on the +lawns at the cable station like robins, with so domestic and contented an air +that it was at times difficult to recall that they were here merely as transients, +and that soon they would be nesting in arctic tundras.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Charles Barrett writes to me from Australia, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>One of our most interesting summer visitors, the turnstone frequents open +beaches on the mainland generally in small flocks, and also favors reefs and +coral strands among the tropical and subtropical islands. When camped, with +other members of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists’ Union, on Masthead +Island, Capricorn Group, Queensland, in October, 1910, I observed many turnstones +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_293">[Pg 293]</span>on the white coral-sand beach. Apparently, with waders of other species, +they had recently arrived, after the long flight from their breeding grounds. +They were active enough, but in poor condition. During migration, they can +have little chance to obtain food, and the strain of flying thousands of miles +affects even the healthiest birds. But they obtain abundance of food in their +Austral haunts, and soon become plump again. Many localities in Australia +are admirably suited to the turnstone’s needs, and it is not a rare bird with +us, indeed, on islands of the Great Barrier Reef, northeastern Queensland, +it may be termed a common species.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>W. B. Alexander tells me that the turnstone is “a fairly common +visitor to Australian coasts. My earliest record is of a pair seen on +the beach at Oyster Cay, Great Barrier Reef, North Queensland, on +August 27, 1925, and my latest record a pair on the estuary of the +Lost River on the south coast of Western Australia on April 25, +1914.”</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="interpres"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span></p> +<p class="center">ARENARIA INTERPRES INTERPRES</p> +</div> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Mainly in the Eastern Hemisphere.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The turnstone breeds on the Arctic coasts of both +hemispheres, but its exact status in North America is still somewhat +indefinite. The known breeding range extends from probably +Greenland (Disco Bay, Tuctoo Valley, and Bowdoin Bay); east to +Iceland; Norway (Smolen Islands); Sweden; Lapland; Finland; +Nova Zembla; Siberia (Balagansk, and Plover Bay); Kamchatka; +probably the Commander Islands; and Alaska (St. Lawrence Island, +St. Michaels, Takshagemut, Port Clarence, probably Cape Lowenstern +and Point Barrow).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—In winter the turnstone is found on the coasts of +Europe and Asia north to the British Isles; Japan and Hawaii. +They range south at this season to South Africa (Cape of Good +Hope); Madagascar; the Mascarene Islands; Australia; New Zealand; +and Chile.</p> + +<p><i>Migration.</i>—In North America, early dates of spring arrival are: +Alaska, St. Michael, May 15; and Greenland, north of latitude +81° 30´, May 27. Late dates of fall departure are Greenland, north +of latitude 81° 31´, September 11; and Alaska, Nushagak, September +21.</p> + +<p><i>Casual record.</i>—The turnstone can be considered only as a casual +or accidental visitant anywhere in North America south of the breeding +grounds. A specimen taken at Pacific Beach, California, September +8, 1904, was identified as the European race, but the record +also has been questioned (Grinnell). Four specimens taken on San +Geronimo Island, Lower California, March 15, 1897, were considered +by Oberholser as typical of the European or Asiatic race. One was +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_294">[Pg 294]</span>obtained at Monomoy Island, Massachusetts on September 8, 1892 +(Bishop); and Wayne took a specimen on Dewees Island, South +Carolina, May 30, 1918.</p> + +<p>[<span class="smcap">Author’s note.</span>—For the author’s views on the distribution of the +two forms of the turnstone, see his note on the distribution of +<i>morinella</i>. There is much individual variation in color, with a decided +sexual difference in size, which opens the question of wrongly +sexed specimens. The individual variation in size is still greater, so +much so that both extremes of both forms are very close together. +A large, dark female of <i>morinella</i>, wrongly sexed, might easily be +recorded as <i>interpres</i>. These facts cast some doubt on North American +records of <i>interpres</i>.]</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Norway and Sweden: 16 records, June 1 to 30; 8 +records, June 7 to 13. Lapland and Finland: 14 records, May 23 +to July 8; 7 records, June 8 to 18.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="morinella"> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">ARENARIA INTERPRES MORINELLA</span></p> +</div> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—North America; Central America; islands of the Caribbean +Sea; and South America.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—Actual breeding records of the ruddy turnstone +are not numerous, so it is difficult to accurately define its breeding +range. From information available it appears that they breed east +from Alaska (Hooper Bay, Colville River Delta, Collinson Point, +and probably Demarcation Point); to Mackenzie (lower Anderson +River, Liverpool Bay, Franklin Bay, and probably Felix Harbor); +Franklin (probably Melville Island, Victoria Island, probably King +Oscar Land); probably Ellesmere and Grant Lands; and northwestern +Greenland. Specimens have been obtained in southern +Mackenzie in June (Fort Resolution and Fort Rae), but there is not +yet any evidence of their breeding in that region. Eggs also have +been reported from “Hudson Bay” (Reinecke), but the record is too +indefinite to stand careful scrutiny.</p> + +<p>Nonbreeding individuals have been detected in summer as far south +as Chile (Sclater); Peru (Callao); the Galapagos Islands (Baur and +Adams); Venezuela (Margarita and Aruba Islands); and the West +Indies (Carriacou and Jamaica). It also has been noted at this +season on the Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf coasts of the United States, +as Florida (Bradentown, Passage Key, Fort De Soto, Key West, and +Daytona Beach); South Carolina (Frogmore, and Mount Pleasant); +North Carolina (Beaufort); Virginia (Hog Island, and Cape +Charles); New York (Fair Haven Light, Long Beach, and Gardiners +Island); Massachusetts (Monomoy Island, and Cape Cod); Louisiana +(Chandeleur Islands, and Breton Islands); Texas (Fort Brown, and +Corpus Christi); and California (Santa Cruz).</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_295">[Pg 295]</span></p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range of <i>morinella</i> can be defined but +little better as the records are frequently confused with <i>Arenaria i. +interpres</i>, to which some of the following may refer. Their range at +this season appears to extend north to California (rarely San Francisco +Bay); Texas (Fort Brown, Point Isabel, Refugio County, and +the Sabine River); probably Louisiana; probably North Carolina +(Fort Macon); and Bermuda (Ireland Island). East to Bermuda +(Ireland Island); South Carolina (Mount Pleasant, and Frogmore); +Georgia (Savannah, Blackbeard Island, and Darien); Florida +(Fernandina, St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, Mosquito Inlet, Cocoa, +Fort Pierce, and Key West); the Bahama Islands (New Providence, +and Great Inagua); Haiti (Monte Cristi, and Samana); Porto Rico +(Mameyes, and Culebra Island); Lesser Antilles (Sombrero, St. +Bartholomew, Carriacou, and Tobago); British Guiana (probably +Abary River); French Guiana (probably Cayenne); and Brazil +(Para, Cajetuba Island, Fernando Noronha, and Abrolhos Island). +South to Brazil (Abrolhos Island); and Chile (Valdivia). West to +Chile (Valdivia, Talcahuano, Paposo, and Atacama); Peru (probably +Chorillos); the Galapagos Islands (Albemarle, Hood, Indefatigable +and Bindloe Islands); Honduras (Swan Island); Guatemala +(Chiapam); Mexico (the Valley of Mexico); Lower California +(San Jose del Cabo, and Magdalena Bay); and California (rarely +San Francisco Bay). Occasionally also, wintering as far north as +Sanak, Alaska (Littlejohn).</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—Early dates of spring arrival are: Virginia, +Accomac County, May 8, Chesapeake, May 10, and Locustville, May +11; New Jersey, Ocean City, May 5, Cape May, May 6, and Long +Beach, May 16; New York, Fair Haven Light, May 10, Montauk +Point, May 12, and Canandaigua, May 14; Connecticut, New Haven, +May 18, and Norwalk, May 19; Rhode Island, Newport, May 13, and +Sachuest Point, May 14; Massachusetts, Nantucket, May 1, Woods +Hole, May 5, and Monomoy Island, May 6; Maine, South Harpswell, +May 20, and Portland, May 22; Nova Scotia, Pictou, May 24; Franklin, +Winter Island, June 10; Illinois, Northeastern, April 30, Englewood, +May 22, Chicago, May 23, and Waukegan, May 24; Indiana, +Starke County, May 20, and Wolfe Lake, May 23; Ohio, Lakeside, +May 11, Oberlin, May 15, Huron, May 17, and Painesville, May 28; +Michigan, Detroit, May 13, Kalamazoo County, May 20, and Ann +Arbor, May 25; Ontario, Toronto, May 18, Kingston, May 20, Moose +Factory, May 26, and Mitchells Bay, May 31; Nebraska, Lincoln, +May 18; Iowa, Burlington, May 21; Minnesota, Lake Ann, May 20, +Minneapolis, May 21, and Walker, May 24; Wisconsin, Madison, May +22; South Dakota, Coteau des Prairies, May 26, and Fort Sisseton, +May 27; Manitoba, Shoal Lake, May 25; Saskatchewan, Île à la +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_296">[Pg 296]</span>Crosse, May 22, and Orestwynd, May 23; Alberta, Tofield, May 15, +and Fort Chipewyan, May 25; Mackenzie, Fort Simpson, May 29; +California, San Nicolas Island, April 7; Oregon, Mercer, May 14; +Washington, Puget Sound, May 6, Willapa Harbor, May 11, and +Shoalwater Bay, May 17; and Alaska, Unalaska, May 19, and Nulato, +May 23.</p> + +<p>Late dates of spring departures are: Peru, Mathews Island, April +24; Porto Rico, Culebrita Island, April 15; Bahama Islands, Andros, +April 26, and Green Cay, April 29; Florida, Punta Rassa, May 13, +St. Marks, May 22, and Daytona Beach, May 24; Georgia, Savannah, +May 29; South Carolina, Egg Bank, May 14, and Mount Pleasant, +June 12; North Carolina, Churchs Island, May 19, and Cape Hatteras, +May 20; Virginia, Wachapreague, May 24, Hog Island, May +19, and Smiths Island, May 31; Pennsylvania, Warren, May 30, and +Erie, June 2; New Jersey, Camden, May 21, and Cape May County, +June 3; New York, Ithaca, June 13, Montauk Point, June 9, and +Orient, June 12; Connecticut, Fairfield, May 29, Westport, May 30, +and Norwalk, June 1; Massachusetts, Dennis, June 2, Marthas Vineyard, +June 8, and Monomoy Island, June 8; Illinois, Chicago, June 9, +Northeastern, June 18; Indiana, Wolfe Lake, June 9; Ohio, Huron, +June 3, Oberlin, June 5, and Lakeside, June 5; Michigan, Detroit, +June 6, and Charity Island, June 15; Ontario, Toronto, June 17; +North Dakota, Devils Lake, June 11; South Dakota, Vermilion, May +30; Texas, Point Isabel, May 14; Minnesota, Cass Lake, May 30; +Wisconsin, De Pere, June 3; Manitoba, Dog Point, June 7, Lake +Winnipeg, June 10, and Shoal Lake, June 12; Saskatchewan, Indian +Head, June 2, and Churchill River, June 9; California, Santa Barbara, +May 6, Farallon Islands, May 7, and San Nicolas Island, May +11; Oregon, Mercer, May 14; and Washington, Willapa Harbor, +May 16.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Early dates of fall arrival are: Washington, Destruction +Island, July 17; California, Monterey Bay, July 18, and +Santa Barbara, July 26; Lower California, San Jose del Cabo, +August 31; Oaxaca, San Mateo, August 9; Saskatchewan, Quill Lake, +August 7, Bigstick Lake, August 9, and Crane Lake, August 11; +Manitoba, Fort Churchill, July 30, Shoal Lake, August 7, and Oak +Lake, August 8; Texas, Rockport, August 12; Ontario, Toronto, July +30, and Point Pelee, August 14; Michigan, Charity Island, August 6; +Ohio, Pelee Island, July 24, Huron, August 3, and Lakeside, August +8; Indiana, Millers, August 8; Illinois, Chicago, July 20, and La +Grange, August 13; Maine, Portland, July 28; Massachusetts, Marthas +Vineyard, July 24, Harvard, July 26, and Monomoy Island, July +27; Rhode Island, Island of Rhode Island, July 26, and Kingston, +August 11; Connecticut, Meriden, August 8; New York, Montauk +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_297">[Pg 297]</span>Point, July 18, Orient, July 28, and Shelter Island, July 29; New +Jersey, Cape May, July 16; Virginia, Cobb Island, August 1, and +Locustville, August 7; North Carolina, Pea Island, August 11; Bermuda, +Coopers Island, July 27; South Carolina, Mount Pleasant, July +15; Georgia, Savannah, August 18; Florida, Palma Sola, July 26, St. +Marks, July 30, Pensacola, August 1, and Daytona, August 10; +Bahama Islands, Mariguana, August 5; Jamaica, Spanishtown, August +13; Lesser Antilles, Barbados, August 22, and St. Croix, September +8; Peru, Payta, September 20; and Chile, Talcahuano, +September 9.</p> + +<p>Late dates of fall departure are: Alaska, St. Michael, September 8; +British Columbia, Graham Island, September 5; Washington, +Simiahmoo, October 3; California, Alameda, October 15; Manitoba, +Oak Lake, September 9; Wisconsin, Sheboygan, September 1; Ontario, +Point Pelee, September 15, and Toronto, September 16; Michigan, +Bay City, September 4, and Detroit, September 5; Ohio, Huron, +October 18, Lakeside, October 21, and New Bremen, October 23; +Illinois, Chicago, October 13; Franklin, Harrowby Bay, August 30, +Newfoundland, September 5; Nova Scotia, La Have Ridges, September +27; New Brunswick, Grand Manan, September 4, and Tabusintoc, +October 23; Quebec, Green Island, October 26; Massachusetts, North +Truro, October 9, Woods Hole, October 20, and (exceptional) Dennis, +November 3; Rhode Island, Point Judith, September 14, and Newport, +October 8; New York, Canandaigua, September 16, Brockport, +October 6, and Orient, October 7.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The ruddy turnstone is not now common anywhere +in the Mississippi Valley and has been recorded on but few occasions +in the lower part of this region and in the States west to the Rocky +Mountains. Among these last are, Arkansas, reported at Osceola by +Doctor Richardson (Howell); Missouri, St. Louis, September 7, +1897; Kansas, Kansas River, August 16, 1898, and Greenwood County, +October 1, 1911; Colorado, Denver, April 26, 1890, and May 18, 1900, +and Barr, September 9, 1907; and Wyoming, Yellowstone Park, +August 30, 1922.</p> + +<p>[<span class="smcap">Author’s note.</span>—The above is the generally accepted theory as +to the distribution of the two forms of the turnstone. The author +has examined a few specimens from Iceland and East Greenland and +a large number from Alaska and various islands in the Pacific +Ocean. The Iceland birds are nearer <i>interpres</i>; the East Greenland +birds are less typical of <i>interpres</i>, with a more decided tendency +toward <i>morinella</i>; no West Greenland birds have been examined +and perhaps they might be nearer <i>morinella</i>; Alaska and Hawaiian +Island birds, as well as those from Polynesia, are much nearer +<i>morinella</i>. Apparently the range of <i>morinella</i> should be extended +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_298">[Pg 298]</span>eastward to western Greenland, and westward to Bering Strait and +to the Pacific islands. Both color and size have been taken into +account in this study.]</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Bering Sea coast of Alaska: 10 records, May 29 to +June 27. Arctic coasts of Alaska and Canada: 19 records, June +19 to August 1; 10 records, June 28 to July 21.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Bl_turnstone"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">ARENARIA MELANOCEPHALA</span> <span class="smaller">(Vigors)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">BLACK TURNSTONE</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The black turnstone replaces to a large extent on the Pacific coast +our well-known ruddy turnstone; both species are found there on +migrations and in winter, but the black is the commoner on that +coast, to which it is restricted. It is a characteristic bird of the +barnacle-covered reefs and rocky shores, being more often seen on +the outlying islands and ledges than on the mainland. There it +lives at the water’s edge, seeking its food within reach of the waves +and often drenched with ocean spray. As it stands motionless it +is almost invisible in its coat of dark brown and might easily be +mistaken for a knob of rock or a bunch of seaweed; but when +startled into flight its conspicuous pattern of black and white flashes +out a distinctive mark of recognition.</p> + +<p><i>Spring.</i>—The black turnstone starts on its northward migration +from the coast of California early in April. Much of the flight is +over the ocean, as the following observation by Austin H. Clark +(1910) shows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On the first day out of San Francisco, May 4, we saw several small flocks +of these birds on their way north; each succeeding day they became more +abundant until on the afternoon of May 8 we saw them by thousands, in +flocks of from 10 or 20 to several hundred. At one time, about 2 o’clock in +the afternoon, the whole sea appeared dotted with white, so abundant were +they. All the birds noticed were headed up the coast, going the same direction +as we.</p> + +<p>In the mornings these birds were comparatively rare; they began to appear +about 11 o’clock, and increased in numbers until about 2, when they were very +abundant; shortly after 3 there was a falling off until by half past 4 few, +if any, were to be seen. This was true every day we were at sea on the +voyage from San Francisco to Puget Sound. Whether they spent the night and +early morning on the neighboring shores or resting on the water I am unable +to say; but all we saw were on the wing; possibly there were other shore +birds in these multitudes, but all which came near the ship were of this +species.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Lucien M. Turner (1886) says that this is one of the earliest +arrivals at St. Michael. His earliest date is May 13. “It arrives +with the earlier geese, and for the first few weeks frequents the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_299">[Pg 299]</span>edges of the low ponds, which are the first to be freed from the +ice in spring. After the sea ice has left the shores it repairs to the +rocky beach and seeks its food among the stones and seaweeds.” +H. B. Conover says, in his notes from Hooper Bay: “The first of +these birds were noted on May 16, when two were taken as they flew +by a small snow-water pond on the tundra. Two days later this +species was very common. Next to the western sandpiper it was +probably the commonest, as well as the noisiest, wader nesting on +the tundra.”</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—Herbert W. Brandt, who has studied this species on +its breeding grounds at Hooper Bay, Alaska, says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The black turnstones, like many of the other shore birds during the mating +season, spend considerable time chasing each other about. The female seems +to say to the male, “catch me if you can,” and then dashes off with such speed +that the pursuer has difficulty in following her, and she usually returns to +the same spot from which her zigzag flight began. Often the male will mount +high into the air alone, until completely out of sight, and then will produce +with his wing or tail feathers, which of the two I have not been able to determine, +the same strange <i>zum-zum-zum</i> noise as made by the Wilson snipe. Before +the nesting season this feather music could be heard on the flats at any time, +and it deceived me at first, as I mistook it for that of the snipe. Later, however, +as soon as the nesting duties began, it seemed to cease; and in this +respect, the black turnstone differs from the Wilson snipe, because the feather +music of the latter is continued throughout the incubation period.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—The same observer describes the nesting habits as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The fantastic shaped shore lines of the lowland brackish ponds furnish +ideal homesites for the vivacious black turnstone as it usually chooses, upon +which to nest, a little projecting grass-covered point or islet. Quite near the +water’s edge the bird will hollow a depression in the flattened dead grass and +here, often upon the almost bare mud with the eternal ice strata only a few +inches beneath, the hardy mother will successfully bring forth a brood. Little +effort is made to build a home and the only material therein is the grass that +previously grew on or about the site and is flattened down into the basin of +the nest. At times there is almost no lining beneath the olive-hued eggs and +they are then so besmeared that they appear to have been deliberately rolled +in the mud. Occasionally, however, the bird will nest some distance away from +the water on a dry site, but always the mode of construction is the same. The +range of measurements of 27 nests is: diameter of basin 3½ to 4½ inches and +depth 1 to 2½ inches. The undecked nests are easy to find if bordering the pools, +provided their general location is known, but the birds keep up such a continual +clamor that it is difficult to guess their chosen area. In favored places they +breed in such close proximity to one another that they appear to colonize. In +no case like the other Charadriidae did I observe these birds about the nest to +feign lameness or distress. Incubation spots were found on both of the parents.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—I can not do better than to quote Mr. Brandt’s description +of the eggs, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The eggs of the black turnstone, invariably four to the nest, are subpyriform +to ovate pyriform in shape, and unlike the glossy egg of the ruddy turnstone, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_300">[Pg 300]</span>reflect but little luster. Due to the flatness of the nest, the eggs, while they +usually rest points together, do not stand as erect while being brooded as eggs +of the sandpipers. The texture of the surface is smooth and the eggs are +not at all fragile. The eggs of the present species are unique among the eggs +of the shore birds at Hooper Bay in that the ground color, the surface markings +and the underlying spots are in the same category of colors which are +the olive hues, but each is a different shade. The olive of the ground color +is tinged with yellowish; the surface markings are much darker, favoring +the browns, while the feeble underlying spots are of a shade between the two. +In consequence, the spots while fairly distinctive and seldom confluent, are not +prominent, the entire egg being of an olive-like cast. The common type of +ground color is “light yellowish olive” to “yellowish olive,” but “buffy olive” +is not rare and some are even “Vetiver green.” The small end is often several +shades lighter than the rest of the egg, but in a large series of specimens the +ground color is very similar. The surface markings are very constant in color, +ranging from “light yellowish olive” to “olive.” These spots are angular and +fantastical and often inclined to be streaked or faintly smeared and are not +at all bold. They are numerous, often almost obliterating the ground color, +and are densest about the larger end. The underlying spots are very shadowy +and often almost invisible and are shades of “olive gray.” On the large end of +every egg there are scattered additional markings of brownish black in the +form of small spots and pen-like streaks. In color and style of markings the +eggs of the black turnstone, when fresh, resemble a common olive type of the +American crow, but even these greenish colors fade considerably in time.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The measurements of 130 eggs average 40.9 by 28.8 millimeters; +the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>46</b> by 29.5, 41 by <b>30.5</b>, +<b>38</b> by 28, and 40.7 by <b>27.8</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Mr. Conover says, in his notes, that “both male and +female take care of the young.” He obtained some data which seems +to show that the eggs hatch in from 21 to 22 days. A nest was found +on May 31 with four fresh eggs; in the evening of June 21 this nest +contained three young, already dry, and one pipped egg; the next +morning the last egg had hatched. Another nest was found on +May 31 with three eggs; the next day there were four eggs; at noon +on June 22 the eggs had not hatched; but at 4 p. m. the next day +the nest was empty and the young had disappeared from the +vicinity.</p> + +<p>Mr. Brandt says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>We enjoyed the pleasure of seeing the downy young for the first time on +June 21, and were greatly interested in them, as they had not been described +or figured. They are born from the egg 21 days after incubation begins, and +the mottled chick, like other shore birds, leaves its nest at once. The downy +young have a remarkably protective coloration, and, furthermore, are distinguishable +from any of their relatives.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Dr. E. W. Nelson (1887) says that—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>when the young are able to take wing in July they leave the flats, to a great +extent, and frequent the seacoast, where they keep in small straggling parties +searching for food along the tide line.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_301">[Pg 301]</span></p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—I have never seen a young black turnstone in natal +down, but Mr. Conover describes it very well, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Above mottled black and “cream buff,” the black strongly predominating. +Line from base of bill extending over and to the center of the eye “cream buff.” +Distinct loral streak of black from base of bill to eye. (Some specimens also +have below this loral stripe a black spot at base of lower mandible). Lower +breast, abdomen and a very small area on chin clear white. Upper throat +“cream buff.” Neck and upper breast mixed black and “cream buff,” but +without distinct mottling. Bill dark horn, iris brown, legs and feet light horn +with fleshy tint. Compared with absolutely identified newly hatched chicks +of <i>A. i. morinella</i>, downy young of this species have a much darker appearance. +On the upper parts the buffy colors are more in the form of specklings, while in +<i>morinella</i> these colors are more blotch-like. <i>Melanocephala</i> also has a very +distinct dark band across the chest, while in the other species this band is +very faintly indicated.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>In fresh juvenal plumage, in July, the head, neck, chest, back, +scapulars and wing coverts are dull, blackish brown, or “sepia,” with +an olive gloss; the feathers of the mantle are narrowly edged with +“pinkish buff”; the scapulars are more broadly edged with the +same; the median wing coverts are tipped and their white edges are +tinged with the same; and the tail feathers are tipped or tinged with +the same color. These buffy edgings have mostly worn away or +faded out to dull white before the birds migrate. Probably a partial +postjuvenal molt in the fall produces a first winter plumage, which +is like the adult, except that some of the juvenal wing coverts and a +few scapulars are retained. A first nuptial plumage appears in a +young bird, collected on March 17, which is beginning to acquire the +white spots of the nuptial plumage on the head and breast, but still +has some old, worn, juvenal scapulars and wing coverts. The young +bird evidently acquires the adult winter plumage at the first postnuptial +molt the following summer.</p> + +<p>Adults have a partial prenuptial molt of the body plumage in +March and April and a complete postnuptial molt in August and +September. The adult nuptial plumage is characterized by the white +lores, the small white spots on the forehead, and the larger white +spots on the sides of the head, neck and chest; otherwise it is like +the winter plumage, though the latter is somewhat lighter brown +on the throat and chest.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—The food of the black turnstone has evidently not been +carefully analyzed, but it apparently consists of small marine animals +such as barnacles, slugs, small mollusks, and crustaceans, such as are +eaten by surf birds and other turnstones. Grinnell, Bryant, and +Storer (1918) mentioned one, taken in Alaska in May, that had been +feeding on heath berries. They quote Bradford Torrey (1913), as +to the method of feeding, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They were feeding in three ways. Sometimes they followed the receding +breaker, gleaning from the surface, as it seemed, such edibles as it had washed +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_302">[Pg 302]</span>in. Mostly, however, they busied themselves upon the wet sand just above +the last reach of the falling tide.</p> + +<p>Once they found a place where the shrimps or prawns were evidently more +plentiful than elsewhere, and it was amusing to see how eagerly they worked, +each determined to get its full share of the plunder. Thrusting their short, +stout bills into the sand, they drew out their squirming prey, dropped it on +the sand, picked it up and shook it, and dropped it again, till finally they had +it in condition for swallowing. These manoeuvers they repeated, all in desperate +competitive haste, till the beach within a circle of a few feet in circumference +was thickly dotted with minute hillocks of sand, such as I should never have +attributed to the work of any bird, had it not been done before my eyes. Then +the supply seemed to be exhausted, and they moved on in search of another +bonanza.</p> + +<p>At other times they resorted to patches of seaweed lying here and there a +little higher on the beach, turning them bottom side up, or brushing them aside, +to feast on such small game as had taken shelter underneath. Their action +here was like that of a dog when he buries a bone by pushing the earth over +it with his nose. They lowered their heads, and with more or less effort according +to circumstances accomplished their purpose. If the obstacle proved too +heavy to be moved in this manner, they drew back a little and made a run at +it as men do in using a battering-ram. More than once I saw them gaining the +needed momentum by this means. They quarrelled now and then over the business, +and once two of them faced each other, bill to bill, like gamecocks—a +most unusual proceeding among waders, firing off little fusilades of exclamations +meanwhile. The turnstones’ disagreements were of the briefest, however, +slight ebullitions of temper rather than any actual belligerency.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—S. F. Rathbun has sent me the following notes on the +behavior of this species:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The tide was just turning from flood, the time being about 3 p. m. On the +rocks of the jetty whose top at the edge of the beach was just above the water’s +surface and at times submerged by incoming waves, was a small flock of black +turnstones numbering about 30. At first the birds would not allow a close +approach but as we slowly neared them would take wing and, then coming +together in close formation, circle in unison, rising and falling, close to the +water’s surface to soon return and alight on the tops of the nearly submerged +rocks. It was a beautiful sight to see them in flight as then the black and +white of their plumage was strongly in contrast. After a short time the birds +allowed a much closer approach for on one occasion we stood within 20 feet of +the flock. As the tide receded much more of the surface of the rocks became +exposed, although at times the waves dashed completely over them, and whenever +this occurred it forced the turnstones to take wing. Sometimes one of the +birds would be caught by an incoming wave and would then emerge in flight +from the water, scattering the spray in all directions. But the rapid recession +of the tide soon gave plenty of ground to search for food and in this all the +birds became busily engaged. Some of the birds while so doing would climb +the very abrupt surface of the rocks, clinging to the moss, which adhered, while +examining with their bills the crevices of the rocks and also the moss for +crustaceans and minute molluscs. At times one or more would rest on the side +of a rock in perfect repose and evidence that a few were paired was seen by +the fact that two often persisted in remaining in company.</p> + +<p>One thing proved somewhat amusing to us, that although during the time +the birds had been feeding they were repeatedly drenched by spray from the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_303">[Pg 303]</span>waves striking the rocks, when they finally ceased to feed a few at odd times +would drop into the shallow water at the base of the rocks to bathe by dashing +it over themselves, following which they would dabble about.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Brandt says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Among the shore birds breeding along the coast of Bering Sea there is none +more interesting and fascinating than this black and white turnstone. When +the mud about the edges of the ponds and tidal sloughs begins to soften, and +the accumulated snow water starts to move, this bird appears enlivening the +bleak, cheerless marshes with its loud-toned cries and butterfly-like appearance. +In the lowland area it is the commonest shore bird, and its contrastive black +and white figure is doubly conspicuous, because it resents intrusion of its haunts +and sallies forth to meet the approaching stranger; whereas the rest of the +shore-bird tribe found there either skulk away or exhibit indifference. As the +Pacific godwit is the self-appointed guardian of the upland tundra, so the black +turnstone patrols the lowlands, often to the dismay of the hunter or the irritation +of the ornithologist. In spite of its chunky body and comparatively short +wings, it is gifted with elegance and swiftness of flight. It does not, like the +phalarope, afford an inviting target for the young native hunters, because not +only does it scold on the wing, but it also moves so nervously while on the +ground that it is not quiet there even for a fraction of a second. No doubt the +hunting jaegers consider it the pest of the flats, for while passing through its +domain, these freebooters are usually being annoyingly followed by one or more +of these fiery and courageous defenders.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Turner (1886) says that—</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The sea-otter hunters, both native and white, detest this bird, as it frequents +the places most resorted to by marine mammals and is certain to give alarm to +the otter or seal which the hunter is endeavoring to approach.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—Doctor Nelson (1887) says: “It has a habit of circling +around the intruder, during the nesting season, with a fine, clear, +peeping cry like the syllables <i>weet, weet too-weet</i>, as it moves restlessly +about. When disturbed in the vicinity of its nest it also has +a sharp <i>peet, weet, weet</i>, very similar to the well known note of the +spotted sandpiper.” Mr. Turner (1886) says that when alarmed +and “taking flight they utter a rattling scream” which is quite +startling.</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—When standing the black turnstone may be recognized +by its uniformly dark head, neck, and chest, above a white +belly; it lacks the white throat of the turnstone, and its upper parts +appear all dark. But when flying it shows white patches quite similar +to those of the turnstone, a patch in the center of the back, the +base of the tail, a stripe in the scapulars and a broad band across +the wings; there is rather more white in the wing than in the turnstone +and the black tips extend along only the outer half of the wing; +the surf bird has a much narrower white stripe in the wing.</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—Doctor Nelson (1887) says, of the departure of these birds +from Alaska: “In autumn they move gradually to the southward, +until by the last of August they become rarer, and during the first +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_304">[Pg 304]</span>half of September all have gone with the exception of an occasional +straggler found along the seashore.” The migration extends down +the coast as far as Lower California.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—Carl Lien regards them as common winter residents on +Destruction Island, off the coast of Washington. He says, in his +notes that they “begin to arrive about July 26 and leave in the spring +the first week in May. They confine themselves entirely to the reefs +and are very sociable, keeping up a continual chatter. The Aleutian +sandpiper and a surf bird or two will nearly always be found among +them. About 75 or 100 birds winter here.”</p> + +<p>A. B. Howell (1917), referring to the islands off the coast of +southern California, says that “this is by far the most abundant shore +bird on the islands, much more so than on the mainland, occurring +in flocks of as many as 30 individuals, and frequenting the rockiest +shores.”</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Pacific coast of North America, casual in northeastern +Siberia.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—So far as known, the black turnstone breeds +only on the Alaskan coast, the breeding range appearing to extend +from Chichagof Island on the south, north to probably Montague +Island, Ugashik, Nushagak, Hooper Bay, the Yukon Valley, St. +Michael, Cape Prince of Wales, and probably the Kobuk River.</p> + +<p>At this season it also has been detected on Wrangel Island, and +Herald Island (Nelson) but is not known to breed, while nonbreeders +have been noted south on the coast at British Columbia, Skidegate; +Oregon, Yaquina Bay; California, Farallon Islands, Monterey Bay, +Point Pinos, and San Miguel Island; and Lower California, Los +Coronados Islands.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—The winter range of the black turnstone extends +north nearly to the breeding grounds and but little south of the +southern limit of the nonbreeders. They have been noted in winter +north rarely to Alaska (Craig and Howkan). Also in southern +British Columbia (Victoria); Washington (Bellingham Bay, Smith +Island, Dungeness, and Clallam Bay); Oregon (Yaquina Bay and +Netarts Bay); California (Eureka, Tomales Bay, San Francisco, +Monterey, San Miguel Island, Santa Cruz Island, San Pedro Bay, +Santa Catalina Island, San Clemente Island, and San Diego +County); and lower California (San Quintin Bay, probably San +Geronimo Island, Magdalena Bay, and Santa Margarita Island).</p> + +<p><i>Migration.</i>—Because of the presence of individuals throughout the +year in practically the entire range of the species, migration data are +not significant.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_305">[Pg 305]</span></p> + +<p>The following dates of spring arrival are, however, available: +Alaska, Admiralty Island, April 17; Juneau, April 29; Forrester +Island, May 6; Bethel, May 12; Craig, May 15; and Nulato, May 16. +Dates of fall departure from Alaska are Nushagak, September 22; +Homer, September 26; St. Lazaria Island, September 30; and +Wrangel, November 4.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—On August 15, 1912, a flock of 20 was observed at +Chaun Bay, northeastern Siberia (Thayer and Bangs). A specimen +in the collection of the Philadelphia Academy of Sciences was presumed +to have been obtained in India, but the occurrence has been +challenged (Hartert) on the basis that proof is lacking that the +specimen was actually there collected. The record accordingly is +eliminated for lack of evidence.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Alaska: 96 records, May 28 to July 5; 48 records, +May 31 to June 1.</p> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<h2 style="display: none; visibility: hidden;" id="HAEMATOPODIDAE">Family HAEMATOPODIDAE Oyster catchers</h2> +<p class="center">Family HAEMATOPODIDAE Oyster catchers</p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">HAEMATOPUS OSTRALEGUS</span> <span class="smaller">Linnaeus</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">EUROPEAN OYSTER CATCHER</span></p> +<p class="center"><i>Contributed by Francis Charles Robert Jourdain</i></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>This is another species whose claim to a place in the American list +rests on its occurrence in Greenland, but, rather curiously, all the +occurrences are recorded from the west coast and not from the east +side, as might have been expected. Herbert Winge, in 1898, was +able to record six specimens obtained at various localities between +1844 and 1898, as well as one reported in the autumn of 1893. As it +is a breeding species in Iceland, its occurrence in Greenland from +time to time may well be expected.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—As the oyster catcher is an extremely striking bird, +with its strongly contrasted plumage of black and white, red bill, +and flesh-colored feet, and is also by no means scarce and very noisy, +its breeding habits challenge attention, and a good deal has been +recorded on the subject by Edmund Selous, Seton Gordon, William +Farren, and others. It is on the whole a sociable species, and one +peculiar characteristic is that in the middle of the breeding season +it is not unusual to find three birds together, either resting or in +flight, without any open signs of hostility. According to Selous, +these associations are often composed of two males and one female, +and as he observed them together not only in the early part of the +pairing time but also late in the season, it would seem that, except +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_306">[Pg 306]</span>perhaps just in the height of sexual activity, the social instinct is +predominant. The following account is taken from William Farren’s +(1910) description of the “Piping parties”:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The piping of the males depends on the presence of the female. Another male +in the neighborhood hears the note, becomes interested, pipes a little, and then +flies direct to where the performance is taking place. He places himself by the +side of the other male and the two pipe together to the female. Generally +unresponsive, the female may walk away, when she is followed by the two +males, who continue their serenade. In one instance observed by Mr. Selous, +the female flew down to a lower shelf of rock and the two males piped down +to her from above; and when at last she flew away they, with a few single +querulous notes, assumed their ordinary attitude and walked disconsolately +about. The flight of the female always ended the performance.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Selous (1901), in describing the piping serenade of the male, +states that when he begins he faces her, but “having once begun he +seems more enthralled by his own music than by her and will turn +from side to side or even right round and away from her, as though +in the rhythmical sway of his piping.” This remarkable song is +audible a long way off and is described well by Selous as “an earpiercing +clamor.” He writes it as “<i>kee kee kee kee kervee kervee +kervee kervee kervee</i>” becoming fainter in its later stages and ending +in a long-drawn out quavering trill. In some cases, according to +Selous, the female also pipes, and one pair, presumably already +mated, will chase another pair, all four piping together. He also +instances a case in which an unattached male approached close to +where a hen was sitting; she left the nest, and, joining her mate, the +two advanced on the intruder, piping a warning, and put him to +flight.</p> + +<p>Perhaps the fullest study of the subject is contained in a paper by +J. S. Huxley and F. A. Montague (1925). Here the piping is described +thus:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Any number of birds, from one to seven or eight or possibly more, may take +part in it. Typically, what occurs is as follows: One or more birds begin the +loud characteristic piping which typically again is given in a special attitude, the +head and bill directed straight downward, the bill held open and very slightly +vibrated, the neck thrust forward so that the shoulders show up with rather a +horsey look. Sometimes, but not always, the whole body is bobbed up and down +at intervals in the way common to so many wading birds, but not very markedly. +Frequently, but again not always, the performers trot rapidly round when +piping, very often close side by side and usually in a serpentine course, with +short quick steps. Sometimes one of the performers will suddenly turn right +round through 180° in the middle of its performance; one I saw turn through +the complete 360° in two spasms.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Huxley and Montague have shown that this piping performance +has not only a sexual significance, but that it also plays a number of +other rôles in the bird’s life, as, for instance, in unilateral courtship, +mutual courtship, aggression, sexual jealousy, territorial jealousy, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_307">[Pg 307]</span>and probably social excitement—that is, under all forms of strong +emotion except fear. Details are given of observed piping by large +parties, two pairs, threes (the commonest form), “twos” and “ones.”</p> + +<p>Another courtship activity recorded in the same paper is the slow-butterflylike +flight with the wing beats at about half the ordinary +pace carried out by a solitary bird. Coition is apparently preceded +by no preliminary ceremony whatever, the initiative coming from the +male, the female standing quite still and giving no visible indication +of readiness to pair. For a fuller discussion on the origin and +meaning of the piping ceremony the reader is referred to the paper +by Huxley and Montague (1925).</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—There is considerable variation in the nesting sites of +this species. Among sand dunes it is often to be met with on the +summit of a dune, a mere hollow in the sand. On shingle banks it +may be among pebbles, sometimes lined with small white stones or +shells, obviously brought by the bird. Other nests are placed in +natural recesses of rock, on grass land, when at times quite a good-sized +nest is built of any wrack or rubbish available. While in many +cases the nest is placed close to the shore it is frequently found in +Scotland by the sides of the rivers far inland, and on the continent, +in level grassy meadows in the reclaimed marshes of Holland. Exceptionally +nests have been recorded from a larch wood on an island, +among bracken, etc.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The normal number of eggs is three, but two are also +commonly found, and in some districts sets of four are not at all +uncommon. Exceptionally five and six eggs have been found together. +As is usually the case where three eggs are normal, they are oval +rather than pyriform in shape and in color are yellowish stone or +ochreous, boldly marked with spots, streaks, and scrawls of blackish +brown and some ashy shell marks. There are also variations with +warm rufous tinge in the ground color, or very rarely with a pale +bluish ground or even pure white. Some sets are boldly blotched +with sepia black. The measurements of 100 British eggs, made +by the writer, average 57 by 40.07 millimeters; the eggs showing the +for extremes measure <b>70.1</b> by 37.4, 62.1 by <b>48.9</b>, <b>51.6</b> by 40.4, and 62.6 +by <b>35</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Incubation is carried on by both sexes, but probably +the female takes the greater share, and she has been observed to +sit for three or four hours without changing. The period is estimated +at 21 days (Paynter), 23 to 24 days from finding full set +(W. Evans), and 24 days (Faber). Probably the latter estimates +are more correct. The young when hatched remain a day or two in +the nest and are attended by their parents for at least five weeks +after hatching, according to J. M. Dewar (1908). R. H. Brown, +however, estimates it as about 29 days.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_308">[Pg 308]</span></p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The plumages and molts are fully described in A +Practical Handbook of British Birds edited by H. F. Witherby +(1920).</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Chiefly marine mollusca; univalves, such as limpets +(<i>Patella</i>), small whelks (<i>Buccinium</i>) and periwinkles (<i>Litorina</i>) +and bivalves, including mussels (<i>Mytilus edulis</i>), cockles (<i>Cardium</i>), +etc. Also annelida, earthworms, and sandworms; crustacea (shrimp, +etc.), and insects, including Coleoptera, Diptera and their larvae +(especially Tipulidae), Lepidoptera (larvae and pupae of Noctuidae); +occasionally Holothurians and some vegetable matter (grass seeds, +grains, etc.).</p> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The feeding habits of the oyster catcher have been exhaustively +studied by J. M. Dewar, who has given the results of his +investigations in a paper in the Zoologist for 1908. Careful examination +of the shells of mussels showed that about 78 per cent were +opened by means of a stab from the bill through the dorsal border. +As in their normal position this is the exposed portion this is perhaps +natural, but only those which have the valves slightly opened +are vulnerable and the weakest point in the shell is on the ventral +border, which is rarely exposed. The best feeding time is when the +scalps are first exposed by the ebb, before the mussels have closed +their shells and again when the tide is rising and the shells are just +beginning to open again. When the tide is up the birds rest in long +lines, head to wind. The flight of the oyster catcher is peculiar and +characteristic, the wings being rapidly moved within a very short +arc, so that they seem to be vibrated at the tips.</p> + +<p><i>Enemies.</i>—The oyster catcher has few natural enemies, though no +doubt occasionally a nest is destroyed by Corvidae (hooded crows +and carrion crows or rooks).</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—The Misses Rintoul and Baxter have observed a tendency +to the renewal of spring display during the autumn months. The +Shetland birds move southward in September and do not return until +March.</p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—During the winter months the oyster catcher is generally +to be met with in flocks, easily recognized by their striking coloration +and characteristic notes. The wild ringing sound of their calls, +a clear <i>kle-eep</i>, coming from hundreds of throats at once, is, as T. A. +Coward remarks, as delightful as it is harmonious.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—Iceland, the Faroes, the British Isles, and the +coasts of northern Europe from northwest Spain and Brittany to +the Baltic, and along the Scandinavian coast to Archangel, probably +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_309">[Pg 309]</span>also in the Black and Caspian Seas, south to Macedonia and Asia +Minor. Replaced by allied forms in Asia and Japan.</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—Some winter in Iceland, many in the British Isles, +but the main winter quarters lie in the Mediterranean, the Red Sea, +the Persian Gulf, the African coast south to Mozambique, and India.</p> + +<p><i>Spring migration.</i>—At the Straits of Gibraltar the passage northward +takes place in April and May, according to Farrer, and in Malta +in April, but in the eastern Mediterranean it is apparently rather +earlier, for in Greece one has been noted at the end of March, and +Lindermeyer gives mid-April as the main passage date. At Corfu it +has been seen on March 20. Danish birds arrive on their breeding +grounds late in March or early in April, and in southern Sweden in +March while in Finland not till late April.</p> + +<p><i>Fall migration.</i>—Gaetke noted many young birds on Heligoland +in August and migrants have been recorded for Greece in mid-August. +The autumn movement is more prolonged than the spring +passage, owing to the presence of young as well as adults, so that at +Malta birds have been recorded from August to November. The +main passage at Tangier takes place in October.</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—Winge’s Greenland records include two dated +April 19, 1885, near Nanortalik, and one on June 16, 1888, north of +Jakobshavn. It has also been noted on Jan Mayen (A. G. Nathorst +and L. C. Masters); once north of Bear Island, July 28, 1910; and +once in Spitsbergen, July, 1906 (Mathey-Dupraz).</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—From the British Islands, April 26 to June 26 (25 +dates), May 2 to 29 (14 dates), June 4 to 26 (10 dates); Holland, +May 11 to 25 (25 dates); Norway, June 10 to 27 (8 dates); Faroes, +May 15 to 22 (3 dates).</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Am_oyster"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">HAEMATOPUS PALLIATUS PALLIATUS</span> <span class="smaller">Temminck</span><br> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">AMERICAN OYSTER CATCHER</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The usual impression that one gets of this large and showy wader +is a fleeting glimpse of a big, black and white bird disappearing in +the distance over the hot, shimmering sands of our southern beaches. +It is one of the shyest and wildest of our shore birds, ever on the +alert to escape from danger; I have never shot one and seldom have +had half a chance to do so. Even during the breeding season when +its anxiety for its eggs or young prompts it to be less wary, it flies +around the intruder in wide circles, well beyond gun range, yelling +its loud notes of protest. It was evidently about as shy even in +the days of Audubon and Wilson, for both mentioned its wariness. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_310">[Pg 310]</span>It was much commoner in those days, of course, and enjoyed a much +wider distribution. Audubon (1840) records it at Portland, Me., +and as breeding on the south coast of the Labrador Peninsula; it +seems as if he must be mistaken about the latter locality, although it +is interesting to note that the European oyster catcher breeds as +far north as Russian Lapland.</p> + +<p>The oyster catcher prefers the same broad, sandy beaches as the +Wilson plover and the least tern select for their breeding grounds; +and at other seasons it frequents similar resorts with all the little +sand plovers and beach birds. The small plovers are protectively +colored, but the oyster catcher is not only big, but is most conspicuously +colored. Perhaps it needs no protection against the +ordinary foes of the little fellows; and evidently its wits are sufficient +protection against larger enemies. But in spite of the fact that it +is well able to take care of itself, its range has been greatly restricted +and its numbers very much reduced during the past 50 years. It +formerly bred abundantly on Cobb Island, Virginia, but when we +were there in 1907 we saw very few and found no nests or young.</p> + +<p>H. H. Bailey (1913) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>This large, showy bird fell an easy mark to the spring gunners, breeding +as it did during the height of the spring migration of “beach birds,” from +May 10 to 25. Nesting among the sand dunes or flat beaches back from the +ocean, over which the spring gunners tramped daily, these birds were right +in the line of travel, so to speak, and were either killed or their nests broken up.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Recent records from South Carolina, where we found it common in +1915, seem to indicate that it is becoming rarer even there. And +during the whole winter of 1924 and 1925, spent on the west coast +of Florida, I saw only one.</p> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—While visiting Arthur T. Wayne on the coast of South +Carolina, we found three nests of three eggs each of the oyster +catcher on May 22 and 23, 1915. The first two nests were on the +broad, sandy beaches of Bull’s Island among numerous scattered bits +of shells and pebbles. The other was on Vessel Reef in Bull’s Bay, a +low, flat, sand reef, with small areas of marsh grass in which willets +were nesting. The oyster catchers’ nests were all on the higher parts +of the dry, flat, sand beaches, well above high-water mark; they +were mere hollows in the sand, entirely without lining, on little +mounds of sand or elevations, where the birds could have a good outlook; +usually a regular pathway of footprints in the sand led up +to the nest. The birds were never seen on or near the nests, but +were flying about in the distance making a great outcry. The nests +were easily found by following the tracks and looking for the little +elevations. Several pairs of Wilson plover were nesting near them.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_311">[Pg 311]</span></p> + +<p>W. J. Erichsen (1921) “found a single egg deposited in a depression +on top of a wall of oyster shells on Raccoon Key,” but an unusually +high tide washed the egg away. He also found a set of +three eggs “in a slight depression on top of a bank of oyster shells +which had been thrown up by the surf”; and he says that “where +nesting sites of this character can be found, this species always +selects them.”</p> + +<p>Oyster catchers’ nests are usually not near together, but M. H. +Burroughs has sent me some notes on some nests he found in +Glynn County, Ga., that are an exception to the rule. A set of +four eggs, two fresh and two partially incubated, was “on a slight +mound, the nest having a few broken bits of shells in it and nearly +entirely surrounded with a rim of broken bits of shells, evidently +raked up by the birds.” Six feet away, under a log “which had both +ends resting on mounds of sand,” was a set of two. There were two +other nests, each about 150 feet away in different directions.</p> + +<p>George B. Sennett (1879) found a nest on Padre Island, Tex., +which was quite different; he describes it as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The nest was situated on dry mud a rod or so from the water, and was +simply a slight depression, of the size of a small tea plate, lined with shells +and pieces of shells; none of them were larger than an inch in diameter, and +most much smaller. They were chiefly small oyster shells, and were placed +more on the sides than at the bottom of the nest. No particle of grass or +anything else but shells composed the nest. What was strange to me was that +on the island where I found it not a shell or piece of one could be seen, and +these must have been brought by the bird itself from the adjacent shell islands +or oyster beds. This was the only nest found on the island.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Walter J. Hoxie (1887) claims to have seen an oyster catcher +remove the eggs from a nest he was watching. Both birds were +standing near the nest, when “one flew off to a distance of about 100 +yards.” He then observed:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>After looking carefully about for a few minutes, he gave a call, and his +mate rose from her nest and joined him. They seemed to be making a lot of +fuss out there, kicking up the sand, squatting down, and cackling like mad. +In a few minutes, though, they seemed to get over this excitement and one +bird came flying back and settled on the eggs. Now she began to act strangely, +wiggling round and squatting down again, and I began to think she was going to +lay another egg, when off she went and joined her mate who welcomed her +coming with the most extravagant cries and gestures. But she sat down +quite still and demure. I was about to rise and look for my third egg when I +saw her coming back. Again she went through the same operation and her +second welcome was, if possible, more exuberant than the first. Then all was +quiet; one bird sat on the sand and the other stood silently by her, and +though I waited some time longer they showed no sign of returning again to +their eggs, and I could only conclude that they had seen me watching them +and would not come back until I went away. So I arose from my uncomfortable +position and went to pick up the eggs, when to my surprise the little +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_312">[Pg 312]</span>hollow in the sand was empty. While I was watching the curious antics of +the female she had lifted the eggs between her legs and carried them off. +So without giving time for her to repeat the offense I hurried to her new +quarters and secured them successfully.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The oyster catcher lays two or three eggs, more often the +latter I believe, and very rarely four. They are ovate to elongate +ovate in shape and have only a very slight gloss. The ground color +is usually “cartridge buff,” sometimes it is “pale olive buff” and +rarely “deep olive buff” or dull “chamois.” They are irregularly +and rather sparingly marked with spots and small blotches, occasionally +a few scrawls of black, brownish black, or very dark browns, +“mummy brown” or “bister,” and underlying spots in various +shades of “Quaker drab” or “mouse gray.” The measurements of +56 eggs average 55.7 by 38.7 millimeters; the eggs showing the four +extremes measure <b>62</b> by 38.9, 57.2 by <b>42.2</b>, <b>51.8</b> by 39.9, and 52 by +<b>33.5</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—The period of incubation for the European species is +from 21 to 24 days, and both sexes share in this duty, though it is +mostly performed by the female. We have no data on this subject +for the American species, but probably it is not much different. +When the temperature is just right the eggs may be left exposed +to the sun, but at night or when it is too hot or too cold they are +covered by the incubating bird, whose judgment is reliable in such +matters.</p> + +<p>The young are able to run soon after they are hatched, and when +they become strong on their legs they can run so fast that it is +very difficult to catch them. At a note of warning from their watchful +parents, they squat in the sand, or against some convenient object, +and remain perfectly still, their protective coloring making them +almost invisible. Both parents show their anxiety by flying around, +usually at a safe distance, and yelling their loud notes of protest. +Herbert K. Job (1905) once hunted thoroughly over a barren strip +of sand, where he knew there was a young oyster catcher, without +success; he was about to give it up and go away, when he saw a little +wisp of driftweed at the water’s edge on a strip of bare wet sand; +and beside it the young bird was lying, flat on the sand and absolutely +motionless. It did not move while he was photographing it, +but as soon as it was touched off it ran as fast as it could go.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—In the downy young oyster catcher the upper parts +are grizzled with pale buff and dusky; the down is dusky basally and +heavily tipped with “pinkish buff”; the crown is mostly pale buff +and the hind neck and throat are mostly dusky; the back appears +more mottled and has two quite distinct, broad stripes of brownish +black; there is sometimes a similar broad stripe on the nape; a +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_313">[Pg 313]</span>narrow black line runs from the bill, through the eye and to the +nape; a broad black band extends from behind the wing to the tail; +below this and the dusky throat the under parts are white. When +very young, the bill is decidedly hooked at the extreme tips of both +mandibles. In a young bird, about one-quarter grown, the primaries +are bursting their sheaths and the white greater coverts are growing; +the juvenal plumage is appearing on the back, scapulars and +lesser wing coverts; these new feathers are “sepia,” broadly tipped +with “cinnamon”; the crown is “bister,” faintly tipped with “cinnamon”; +the white plumage is coming in on the breast.</p> + +<p>In full juvenal plumage, when the young bird is nearly fully +grown, these colors are somewhat paler; the feathers of the back, +scapulars and wing coverts are “Saccardo’s umber,” tipped with +“clay color” or “cinnamon-buff”; the crown, sides of the head, and +upper chest are dark “bister,” tipped with “cinnamon-buff”; the +chin and throat are mottled with sepia and buffy; the upper tail +coverts are white, tipped with buffy; the tail is dark “bister,” tipped +with “cinnamon-buff”; and the under parts are white. By the end +of July the buffy tips on the mantle have nearly disappeared by wear. +Early in September the post-juvenal molt begins; this involves the +body plumage, but not all the scapulars and wing coverts and not +the tail.</p> + +<p>The first winter plumage is like the adult, the head and neck being +“fuscous” or “Chaetura black” and the mantle “deep mouse gray.” +Young birds can be distinguished by a somewhat slenderer bill and +by the retained and worn juvenal wing coverts, scapulars, and tail +feathers. At the first prenuptial molt they become fully adult.</p> + +<p>Adults have a partial prenuptial molt in late winter and early +spring, involving the body plumage and most of the scapulars and +wing coverts, and a complete postnuptial molt in late summer and +fall.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Audubon (1840) says of the feeding habits of the oyster +catcher:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I have seen it probe the sand, to the full length of its bill, knock off limpets +from the rocks on the coast of Labrador, using its weapon sideways and insinuating +it between the rock and the shell like a chisel, seize the bodies of +gaping oysters on what are called in the Southern States and the Floridas +“raccoon oyster beds,” and at other times take up a “razor handle” or solen, +and lash it against the sands until the shell was broken and the contents +swallowed. Now and then they seem to suck the sea urchins, driving in the +mouth, and introducing their bill by the aperture, without breaking the shell; +again they are seen wading up to their bodies from one place to another, seizing +on shrimps and other crustacea, and even swimming for a few yards, should +this be necessary to enable them to remove from one bank to another without +flying. Small crabs, fiddlers, and sea worms are also caught by it, the shells of +which, in a broken state, I have found in its gizzard in greater or less quantity. +Frequently, while on wet sea beaches, it pats the sand to force out the insects; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_314">[Pg 314]</span>and in one instance I saw an individual run from the water to the dry sand with +a small flounder in its bill, which it afterwards devoured.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Wilson (1832) says that they probe in the sand “with their long, +wedgelike bills in search of small shellfish. This appears evident +on examining the hard sands where they usually resort, which are +found thickly perforated with oblong holes, 2 to 3 inches in depth.” +He seemed to doubt the reports of their eating oysters, but C. J. +Maynard (1896) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When the outgoing tide left the tops of the oyster bars exposed, they would +come flying silently in, at first singly, then in pairs, while groups of a few would +follow, until, at last, they would come in flocks of a dozen or more. They would +alight among the oysters and when the bivalves gaped open, as is their habit +when the water first leaves them, the birds would thrust in the point of their +hard, flat bills, divide the ligament with which the shells are fastened together, +then, having the helpless inhabitant at their mercy, would at once devour it. +They were not long in making a meal, for specimens which I shot after they +had been feeding a short time were so crammed that by simply holding a bird +by the legs and shaking it gently the oysters would fall from its mouth.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—Oyster catchers are strong, swift fliers and at times +are graceful and elegant in their movements. They are striking +birds in flight, displaying to good advantage their conspicuous patterns +of black and white and their bright red bills. Their movements +on the ground are equally graceful as they walk sedately along the +beach or wade out into the water until the waves lap their breasts. +They can swim perfectly well and can even dive readily if necessary. +Audubon (1840) describes their flight evolutions as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Now wheeling with wonderful impetuosity they pass within a hundred yards +of you, and suddenly checking their flight return, not low over the water as +before, but high in the air. Again, they form their ranks in a broad front, and, +again, as if suddenly alarmed by the report of a distant gun, they close pell-mell, +and dip towards the sands or the waters. Shoot one at such a moment +and you may expect to kill another; but as this is done, the wary birds, as if +suddenly become aware of your intentions, form themselves into a straggling +line, and before a minute has elapsed, far beyond reach, and fading on the +view, are the remaining oyster catchers.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—The loud, striking notes of protest, heard as the oyster +catcher flies around the intruder on its breeding grounds, are quite +unlike any other bird notes; they sound like <i>wheep, wheep, wheeop</i>, +and are both vehement and penetrating. John T. Nichols says in +his notes: “The oyster catcher has a creeking note, <i>crik, crik, crik</i>, +etc., used when the bird takes wing. A more striking cry, <i>cle-ar</i>, +suggests the flight calls of the willet and the black-bellied plover.”</p> + +<p><i>Field marks.</i>—A large wader, with black head and dark upper +parts, with a big white patch in its long, pointed, black wings and +with white under parts, can be nothing but an oyster catcher. No +other bird of strong, steady flight can be mistaken for it. One is +seldom near enough to recognize its long, red bill.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_315">[Pg 315]</span></p> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—The oyster catcher is resident throughout most of its +range, but it retires in winter from the northern portion of its breeding +range. Arthur T. Wayne (1910) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>In the winter the oyster catcher is very gregarious and it is not unusual to +see flocks containing from 20 to 75 individuals. The majority of these birds +are undoubtedly migrants from points to the northward of South Carolina and +not the resident breeding birds, which apparently go together in pairs or small +flocks of from 4 to 6 individuals.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the United States, Central +and South America. The American oyster catcher has been subdivided +into several races the exact range of which it is not now +possible to define. This should be borne in mind in considering the +following outline, which undoubtedly includes the ranges of <i>H. p. +durnfordi</i>, <i>H. p. prattii</i>, and <i>H. p. pitanay</i> (Murphy). Generally +speaking, <i>prattii</i> is assumed to be confined to the Bahama Islands, +<i>durnfordi</i> the South Atlantic coast of South America, and <i>pitanay</i> +the Pacific coast of South America.</p> + +<p>The species is not migratory in a strict sense, although the examples +breeding at the north and south extremes of the range probably +retire short distances toward the Equator when forced to do so by +climatic conditions.</p> + +<p>The range may be outlined as follows: North to Texas (Brownsville, +Padre Island, Corpus Christi, and Galveston); Louisiana (Isla +a Pitre); probably rarely Alabama (Petit Bois Island); and formerly +southern New Jersey (Great Egg Harbor). East to formerly +southern New Jersey (Great Egg Harbor, and probably Seven-mile +Beach); probably rarely Maryland (Ocean City); Virginia (Hog +Island, Cobb Island, and Smiths Island); North Carolina (Cape +Hatteras, Ocracoke Inlet, and mouth of Cape Fear River); South +Carolina (Waverly Mills, Raccoon Key, Bulls Bay, Sullivan Island, +and Frogmore); Georgia (Savannah, St. Simon Island, and Cumberland); +Florida (St. Johns River, Charlotte Harbor, and probably +Cape Sable); the Bahama Islands (Abaco, Andros, Long, Mariguana, +and Inagua Islands); probably Porto Rico (Desecheo Island); Venezuela +(Aruba, Curaçao, and Cumana); Brazil (Santa Catherina, +Cajetuba, Rio de Janeiro, Sapetiba Bay, and Iguape); Uruguay (La +Paloma and Montevideo); and Argentina (Lavalle, Cape San Antonio, +Mar Chiquita, and mouth of Chubut River). South to Argentina +(mouth of Chubut River) and Chile (Ancud). West to Chile +(Ancud, Algarrobo, Santiago, Chanaral, and Atacama); Peru (San +Nicolas Bay, Independencia Bay, Pisco Bay, Chilca, and San +Lorenzo); Ecuador (Gulf of Guayaquil and Santa Elena); Panama +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_316">[Pg 316]</span>(Pearl Island); Yucatan (Cozumel Island and Merida); and Texas +(Brownsville).</p> + +<p><i>Casual records.</i>—The American oyster-catcher has on a few occasions +been directed north of its normal range. Among these occurrences +are: New York, a specimen in New York Harbor, May 28, +1877, one about March 9, 1880, at Ponquogue, and one at Greenport, +June 2, 1882; Massachusetts, two in August, 1899, at Chatham, one +in April, 1885, at Monomoy Island, two seen September 10, 1924, at +Eastham, a pair taken in 1837, at Marshfield, and one in Boston harbor, +killed prior to 1814; Maine, reported by Audubon as occurring +at Portland but this record is considered doubtful; New Brunswick, +a specimen has been reported upon the authority of Boardman +(Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway, 1884) as taken at Grand Manan. This +last is considered unsatisfactory as being indefinite, while Audubon’s +statement that it bred in Labrador is probably an error.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Virginia: 37 records, April 26 to July 9; 19 records, +May 21 to June 19. South Carolina and Georgia: 25 records, March +27 to June 25; 13 records, May 5 to 23. Texas: 8 records, March 29 +to May 5.</p> + + +<div class="chapter" id="Frazer"> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">HAEMATOPUS PALLIATUS FRAZARI</span> <span class="smaller">Brewster</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">FRAZAR OYSTER CATCHER</span><br></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>It now seems to be generally recognized that this Lower California +oyster catcher is a subspecies of <i>palliatus</i>, although William Brewster +(1902) originally described it as a full species and named it in +honor of the veteran collector, M. Abbott Frazar. Dr. Robert Cushman +Murphy (1925) has recently reviewed this group, in which he +has designated six subspecies of <i>palliatus</i>, inhabiting various parts +of North and South America. To <i>frazari</i> he assigns the following +limited range:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Pacific and Gulf coasts of Lower California and adjacent parts of Mexico, +including the islands; formerly northward in Ventura County, Calif.; southward +along the west coast of Mexico to Tepic and Jalisco, and at least occasionally +to Guerrero.</p> + +<p>Ridgway lists specimens from Sihutanejo and Acapulco, Guerrero. Contrary +to former opinion, however, this race is principally confined to the zone of +generally arid shores centering about the peninsula and gulf of Lower California. +Its range approaches or meets that of <i>H. p. palliatus</i> on the more tropical +coast farther south, probably at a point not far from the Isthmus of +Tehuantepec.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>He says of the characters of this race:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The subspecific characters of <i>frazari</i>, which include darker coloration of the +brown upper parts than in <i>palliatus</i>, heavy mottling on the breast along the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_317">[Pg 317]</span>junction of white and black plumage, longer wing and tail (?), and smaller +bill and feet, are given fully by Ridgway. The latter makes no mention, however, +of the practical elimination of the white blotching of the primaries, a +character which this oyster catcher shares with other western races. In most +specimens the white spots are wholly lacking, but a few show obsolescent white +or mottled markings of the conventional pattern on the eighth or ninth from +the outermost quill. It is interesting to note that the mottling of the breast, +which is so strongly typical of this race, appears to be carried by a genetic +factor deeply rooted in the species as a whole. Scarcely any large series of +<i>H. p. palliatus</i>, indeed, lacks one or more birds of this type. In its maximum +expression, however, when the whole breast, sides, flanks, and under tail coverts +are heavily blotched, the character is peculiar to <i>frazari</i>.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>W.</i> Leon Dawson (1923) says, in explanation of its disappearance +from California:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>By reason of its conspicuous coloration, as well as its excessive noisiness, +the Frazar oyster catcher has suffered a fatal prominence. Its former appearances +on the Channel Islands (as far north as Ventura County) were concluded +by an early martyrdom, and the species is rare even in its primitive fortresses +on Los Coronados Islands.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—Being more permanently resident than even its eastern +relative, the Frazar oyster catcher has no migrations, except its late +summer wanderings, and remains on its breeding range throughout +the year. As to the nesting habits of this bird at Scammons Lagoon, +Lower California, Griffing Bancroft (1927) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They climb up on the shell banks which are the back stops of the beaches +and there build their nests. The shell banks are usually a yard or two above +high-water mark; they are flat and quite narrow and often have fingerlike +projections of 50 yards or so on the same level, running toward the east. +Typically, all these higher flats are composed of nothing but shell, largely +unbroken and of a size which may be judged in the accompanying illustration. +Sand and small impurities have been garnered by the wind. The oyster catcher +likes to build her nest where she has an unobstructed view in all directions, +securing to herself the opportunity of slipping off unobtrusively at the approach +of an enemy. But she is a stupid bird and is easily satisfied with a makeshift +which seems to her to accomplish her purpose but in reality does not do so +at all. So on some of the earthen islands we find her nesting on little mounds, +from which, it is true, she can see, but to only a matter of a few feet.</p> + +<p>In the Gulf of California the favorite site for an oyster catcher is the end +of the rather long spits of cobblestones. These are so nearly level that a sitting +bird has an unobstructed view for a hundred yards. There she builds a nest +of fine hard material—small pebbles and bits of shell. And as she can not +have broken the larger stones that were originally on the site she must have +removed them. I use the analogy for Scammons. Instead of breaking the +shells with her powerful bill she probably pulls them out of the way until she +has a flat circle about 10 inches across. This clearing she lines as neatly as +tile work, and on them deposits her eggs, one, two, or three. The breeding +season seems quite long, as we found both well-developed young and fresh eggs. +I have observed parents with their young long after the latter had taken wing, +and so feel sure that the oyster catchers raise but one brood a year.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_318">[Pg 318]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p>I have a set of two eggs in my collection, taken by W. W. Brown, +jr., May 2, 1912, on San Jose Island; the nest is described as a depression, +lined with pebbles, in a crevice on top of a jagged, weatherworn +ledge, 40 feet above the surf. There are two sets in the Thayer +collection, taken by Mr. Brown near La Paz on March 24 and 26, +1909; one nest was similarly located to mine; “it was out of reach +of the surf, but the spray, no doubt, dampened it in rough weather”; +the nest from which the other set was taken is described as “a depression +in the sand.” The eggs were laid on the bare ground, there +being no lining to the nest whatever. It was 80 feet from the surf.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The Frazar oyster catcher lays two or three eggs, sometimes +only one. These are practically indistinguishable from those +of the American oyster catcher. The measurements of 27 eggs average +57.1 by 38.8 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes +measure <b>60.9</b> by 37.8, 59.8 by <b>41.5</b>, <b>50.7</b> by 40.8, and 60.7 by <b>36</b> +millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The plumages and molts from the downy stage to +maturity are apparently the same as in the American oyster catcher. +Mr. Bancroft (1927) has published some interesting notes on his +observations, which suggest that either there are two color phases in +these birds or that they interbreed with black oyster catchers (<i>bachmani</i>) +and produce hybrids; I am inclined to accept the latter theory, +but quote from Mr. Bancroft’s (1927) paper, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Ninety per cent of the oyster catchers had white bellies, the rest had all their +underparts black, with the exception of one, whose belly was streaked black +and white. Mr. Chester Lamb wrote me that on Natividad Island there was a +much larger percentage of mixed underparts than we found. That there were +two phases of one bird instead of two distinct species in the lagoon was apparent +to anyone watching them. There was only one case I observed of a black +bird paired with another black; all the other blacks had white-bellied mates. +The difference between the birds was limited to the abdomens; place a mixed +series in a row with the backs up and one could not tell one bird from another. +In their conduct, especially when their nests were threatened, there were no +differences at all. I feel perfectly safe in saying there were no black oyster +catchers (<i>Haematopus bachmani</i>) present. I have seen too many of them, from +Monterey to Sitka, not to know by heart every movement they will make and +every note they will utter when one trespasses on their home sites. The actions +and the cries, and especially the noise, are more unusual and more uniform +than those of any bird with which I am acquainted. They fly customarily in a +complete half circle from the rocks on one side to those on the other, the birds +keeping near each other and almost always close to the water. The noise is +incessant, shrill, continuous, and loud beyond belief. The contrast with the +birds in Scammons is striking. There, both the white and the black bellied are +almost as silent as plover and try to win safety by a prodigious show of indifference. +There is little or no excitement while we tramp around the nesting +sites. When the parents find we can not be persuaded to follow them away +they take up positions 50 to 100 feet from us and there remain motionless, +usually as long as we are in the neighborhood. There is another great +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_319">[Pg 319]</span>difference between <i>H. bachmani</i> and the black phase in the south. The former +is decidedly darker than the latter, especially on the back, whereas true +<i>Haematopus frazari</i> from both ends of the Gulf appear to be the same as those +in Scammons.</p> + +<p>We found and photographed a pair of downy young not over a few days old. +These youngsters are obviously of the white and black types, respectively; we +have the skins to show that there is no photographic illusion here. So we +have very strong evidence that the black and the white phases do mate and +do produce fertile offspring and that the young have partaken of the coloring, +one of one parent and one of the other. These little birds are not mongrels, +though we know from some adults that occasionally there are chicks which do +inherit from both parents. Comparison shows that the white-breasted downy +does not differ at all, at a cursory glance, from a baby taken on Coronado +Island in the Gulf.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The same observer writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Scammons Lagoon is a haven for oyster catchers, or appears so to such of us +as are accustomed to but an occasional pair scattered along the various islands +and rocky projections in the more northerly Pacific Ocean. There are at least +two or three hundred oyster catchers fairly evenly distributed over the islands +we visited, with an occasional pair or so on favorable mainland strands. When +the tides are going down vast stretches of hard flats are exposed and become +feeding grounds. The birds pursue the receding water even to the point of +wading, and there they hunt the small marine life on which they live. When +the tide turns they use the black levels as a lounging place until driven ashore +by the sea. They are markedly indolent and slow in movement and, when +undisturbed, never appear the least bit busy.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Walter E. Bryant (1890) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I found this oyster catcher tolerably common at Magdalena Bay and northward, +and on Santa Margarita Island. They were mated in January. They +were rather shy, running rapidly on the beach, and if approached, taking wing +with loud, clear, whistling notes, and after flying some distance, alighting again +at the water’s edge. Their food was chiefly small bivalves found in the +gravelly beach.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Pacific coast of Mexico and southern California. The +Frazar oyster catcher is confined chiefly to Lower California (San +Quintin Bay, Cedros Island, Natividad Island, San Roque, Ascuncion +Island, Los Coronados Islands, Carmen Island, San Jose Island, La +Paz, and Todos Santos); and the mainland coast of Mexico; Sonora +(Quotla); Sinaloa (Altata); Nayarit (Maria Madre Island, Maria +Cleofas Island, Tres Marias, Isabela Island, and San Blas); and +Guerrero (Sihutanejo, and Acapulco). The species is of casual occurrence +(formerly more common) on the coast and islands of southern +California (San Diego, Santa Barbara Island, San Clemente Island, +and Ventura County). Breeding records for California are not +satisfactory.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Lower California: 39 records, March 24 to June 24; +20 records, April 22 to May 13.</p> + + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_320">[Pg 320]</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">HAEMATOPUS BACHMANI</span> <span class="smaller">Audubon</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">BLACK OYSTER CATCHER</span><br></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>At the northern end of their range, in the Aleutian Islands, I +first became acquainted with these big black waders. Here we frequently +saw them at various points, as we entered or left the rock-bound +harbors, sitting in little groups or in pairs on the rocks or +outlying ledges. They were surprisingly inconspicuous on the wet +and dark colored rocks, which were often half hidden in the prevailing +fogs. They seemed to fit very well into their dark and gloomy +surroundings. They were not particularly shy, as they stood on +the slippery rocks and nodded to us with grotesque dignity, or as +they flew out around us uttering their loud and penetrating cries.</p> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—W. Leon Dawson (1909) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Left to themselves, the birds are no Quakers, and the antics of courtship +are both noisy and amusing. A certain duet, especially, consists of a series of +awkward bowings and bendings in which the neck is stretched to the utmost and +arched over stiffly into a pose as grotesque as one of Cruikshank’s drawings, +the whole to an accompaniment of amorous clucks and wails.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—We did not succeed in finding any nests of the black +oyster catcher in the Aleutian Islands, though they undoubtedly +breed there. Dr. W. H. Dall (1873) found two nests in the Shumagins +on June 23, 1872; there were two eggs “in one nest and one +in another, if nest it could be called, being simply a depression in +the gravel of the beach without even a straw to soften its asperities.” +Dr. Wilfred H. Osgood (1901) found a nest in the Queen Charlotte +Islands, which “was merely a hollow about 2 inches deep and almost +perfectly round, scooped out of a weedy turf a few feet above highwater +mark. The bottom of the hollow was covered with bits of +broken stone, evidently placed there by the old bird.”</p> + +<p>Referring to the rocky islands off the coast of Washington, Mr. +Dawson (1909) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The eggs of the black oyster catcher, normally three in number, are oftenest +placed in the hollow of a bare rock, lined with a pint or so of rock flakes, +laboriously gathered. Occasionally bits of shell, especially the calcareous plates +of the goose barnacle, are added by way of adornment. Now and then the +wader emulates the gull and prepares a careful lining of grasses. One such +nest with three eggs I passed repeatedly, on Carroll, languidly supposing it +to be a gull’s until Professor Jones exclaimed over it.</p> + +<p>For a nesting site the upper reaches of barren reefs or shoulders are chosen, +but on the smaller rocks, where the waders have exclusive rights, the eggs may +be lodged on the very crest of the islet. Again, upon Destruction Island, we +found eggs on a coarse beach gravel, where to the protection of color, stone-gray +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_321">[Pg 321]</span>with black spots and blotches, was added the almost perfect assimilation of +form to that of the rounded pebbles.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The black oyster catcher lays two or three eggs, occasionally +only one and more rarely four. They are very much like the +eggs of the American oyster catcher, but perhaps they will average +a little more buffy. They are ovate in shape and have a very slight +gloss. The ground colors vary from “cream buff” to “olive buff.” +They are usually quite evenly covered with small spots and scrawls +of black or very dark browns, “bister” or “Dresden brown,” and +various shades of “Quaker drab.” The measurements of 44 eggs +average 56.2 by 39.5 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes +measure <b>62</b> by 39.5, 58.1 by <b>42</b>, <b>51</b> by 39.5 and 54.2 by <b>37.5</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><i>Young.</i>—Nothing seems to be known about the period of incubation +or whether both sexes share in it; both parents are interested in +the care of the young and are very solicitous for their welfare. Dr. +Joseph Grinnell (1910) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Dixon observed two half-grown young running about on the beach; but as +soon as the old birds, which were always watching, saw anyone approaching a +warning note was uttered, at which the young ones promptly squatted among +the rocks wherever they happened to be, even if in the edge of the water. They +remained perfectly quiet and blended so nicely with their surroundings that it +was difficult to locate them even when they had been previously seen from a +distance. The old birds attacked and put to rout any gulls or ravens that +approached the vicinity.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Prof. Harold Heath (1915) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The precocial fledglings very early accompanied their parents on short journeys +about the cliffs, and within a week after hatching were observed pecking +at limpets, although it is highly probable that for several days thereafter they +depended on the old birds for the greater part of their food supply. During +this time the young resemble diminutive ostriches, with thick-set legs, big feet, +and fluffy plumage, which, it may be added, harmonizes to a high degree with +the surroundings. Furthermore, they have the same habit of hiding the head +when it is not possible to conceal the entire body beneath a stone.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The downy young black oyster catcher is a swarthy +little fellow, clothed in short, thick, dark, grizzly down, a color pattern +well suited for concealment among the dark rocks where it lives. +The down of the upper parts is basally sooty black and very dark +gray, but the pale buffy tips give the bird its grizzly appearance. +There is an indistinct loral and postocular stripe and two broad, +more distinct, parallel stripes down the back of brownish black and +two blackish areas on the thighs; between the back stripes and on +the rump the buff tips produce a transverse barred effect. The underparts +are dull grays, darkest on the throat and breast and lightest on +the belly; the sides are faintly mottled or barred.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_322">[Pg 322]</span></p> + +<p>In juvenal plumage the young bird is much like the adult, but the +feathers of the wing coverts, scapulars, tertials, and back are tipped +with narrow terminal bars of “cinnamon buff” and subterminal +blackish bars; those of the flanks, thighs, and under tail coverts are +tipped with the same color; most of these buffy tips soon wear away, +and before the postjuvenal molt there are only a few spots left on +the wing coverts, scapulars, and tertials, some of which are carried +through the winter as evidences of immaturity. I have not seen +enough material collected at the proper seasons to trace the molts +of adults.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Mr. Dawson (1909) writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Even when visiting the mainland shore, which is not often, the bird confines +its attention to the barnacle-covered rocks and high-lying mussel beds. Its food +consists of marine worms and crustaceans of various sorts, barnacles, limpets, +and especially mussels. Its stout, chisel-shaped beak enables it to force an +entrance into the most refractory mussel shell and to sever as by a knife the +strong adductor muscles, which hold the valves together. Its feet also are +large and strong, and the toes are provided with an elaborate set of pectinations +which enable the bird to maintain a footing upon the most slippery rocks. +If the foothold on a sloping rock is anywise precarious, the bird retreats +backward and uphill by means of these convenient calks.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>A. B. Howell (1917) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>Certain rocky points are selected by the birds, and to these are often brought +the barnacles which they pry off the rocks. These are worked over at leisure, +and at one such depot on the Coronados, which I examined there was fully a +bushel of shells.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—The flight of the black oyster catcher is strong and +direct, but it seemed to me to be rather slow and heavy. Lucien M. +Turner (1886) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The flight consists of a few rapid strokes of the wing, followed by a sail +for a few yards. It is sluggish when on the wing, and flies with difficulty, +and rarely long continued. When alarmed it flies over the water within a +few yards of the shore, and in going from one point of rocks to another it either +makes the trip in easy stages from one large rock to another, or else follows +the indentations of the shore line. The bird is always on the alert, and not at +all shy. It generally sees the hunter long before he suspects the presence of +the bird. The bird either squats in a depression of the rocks, or stealthily +creeps to the top of some huge bowlder, where it utters a piercing, whistling +chatter like that of a policeman’s rattle. It causes the intruder long search to +discover the presence of the bird, for its color is so near that of the rocks it +frequents that it is not easily detected. The note is then answered by another +bird, so that in a few minutes a dozen may be chattering hideously, making the +hunter wonder where all the birds came from so suddenly, as all the birds within +hearing assemble on the first note of alarm.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Carl Lien says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>If occasion requires these birds are good swimmers and, if pursued when +crippled, will dive deep and long. A very alert bird and always first to give +alarm.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_323">[Pg 323]</span></p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—My notes refer to the cries of this bird as loud, penetrating +screams, sounding like <i>whee-up</i>, or <i>whee-ep</i>.</p> + +<p>Doctor Dall (1873) says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>They utter, when disturbed, a peculiar, low whistle; which once heard, is +likely to be remembered; and they have a habit of standing on the beach or +rocks a little way apart, and whistling to one another; one calling and the +other answering; and keeping it up for half an hour at a time. It is one of +the most peculiar birds of the region, in its motions, having a grave, solemn +and stilted gait, and bobbing its head up and down with every step.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Winter.</i>—As the black oyster catcher is practically resident all +the year round throughout most, if not all, of its range, there is not +much to be said about its migrations, though there is probably some +shifting of individuals. Doctor Dall (1873) refers to it as a summer +visitor in the Aleutian Islands, but Mr. Turner (1886) records it as +a permanent resident there.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—Pacific coast of North America and Lower California.</p> + +<p><i>Breeding range.</i>—The breeding range of the black oyster catcher +extends north to Alaska (Atka Island, Range Island, St. Paul +Harbor, Montague Island, Hinchinbrook Island, Sitka, St. Lazaria +Island, probably Kuiu Island, Coronation Island, Prince of Wales +Island, Forrester Island, and Duke Island); south along the coast of +British Columbia (Porcher Island, Skidegate, Vancouver Island, and +New Westminster); Washington (Bellingham Bay, Waldron Island, +Flattery Rocks, Quillayute Needles, Destruction Island, and Copalis +Rock); Oregon (Three Arch Rock, Newport, and Bandon); California +(probably Prince Island, Eureka, probably the Farallon +Islands, Point Pinos, San Miguel Island, Santa Cruz Island, Anacapa +Island, San Clemente Island, and San Diego); and Lower California +(Todos Santos, San Benito Island, Cedros Island, Natividad Island, +Abreojos Point, and Los Coronados Islands).</p> + +<p><i>Winter range.</i>—In winter, the black oyster catcher is found +throughout its breeding range except (normally) in Alaska and +(probably) northern British Columbia. It has, however, been recorded +on one occasion at this season, in Alaska, St. George Island, +January 12, 1917 (Hanna).</p> + +<p><i>Migration.</i>—An early date of arrival in Alaska is Unalaska Island, +April 29, while a late date of departure is St. Lazaria Island, September +30.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Alaska: 14 records, June 5 to 26; 7 records, June 13 +to 23. British Columbia: 13 records, May 27 to June 20; 7 records, +June 6 to 12. California: 7 records, May 25 to June 10.</p> +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_324">[Pg 324]</span></p> +<h2 style="display: none; visibility: hidden;" id="JACANIDAE">Family JACANIDAE Jacanas</h2> +<p class="center">Family JACANIDAE Jacanas</p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">JACANA SPINOSA GYMNOSTOMA</span> <span class="smaller">(Wagler)</span></p> +<p class="center"><span class="allsmcap">MEXICAN JACANA</span></p> +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">HABITS</span></p> +</div> + +<p>The American jacanas are now split into three species and three +additional subspecies, six forms in all. They are widely distributed +throughout the American Tropics. All are closely related and all +are much alike in habits. The above form barely comes within the +range of our check list, as a rare straggler from Mexico into the +valley of the lower Rio Grande near Brownsville, Tex.</p> + +<p>I have never seen this curious bird in life, but can imagine that +it must be a beautiful sight to see it tripping lightly over the floating +lily pads, supported on its long toes, where it seems to be +actually walking on the water; and it must produce quite a surprising +thrill as it spreads its wings to fly, displaying the conspicuous +yellow-green patches in its wings, which flash in the sunlight like +banners of golden yellow. It seems like a strange connecting link +between the spur-winged plovers and the rails or gallinules.</p> + +<p>It is a sedentary species of decidedly local distribution and seldom +strays far from its favorite breeding haunts. Thomas S. Gillin, +who has sent me some very good notes on this bird, describes its +habitat as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I learned of a lake a few miles from Tampico and on my first visit to this +lake on April 3, 1923, I found over a dozen birds feeding and chasing one +another over the floating vegetation. As the first sets of eggs were found on +April 25 I apparently found them right in the midst of the mating season. +The lake where I found them was about a half mile long and from 100 to 250 +yards wide, curved and irregular in outline. Nowhere in the lake was the +water over 4 feet deep except where the alligators had their holes; in some of +these spots there was always danger of getting in over one’s head. Scattered +through the lake were a few stunted trees similar in appearance to our sour +gum, <i>Nyssa sylvatica</i>, and in the decayed stump of one of these trees I found +a nest of the black-bellied tree duck. About one-third of the surface of the lake +was open water and the remaining two-thirds was covered with a floating +plant, each individual plant measuring about 12 inches across and resembling +lettuce that has not headed up, though the leaves were coarser, more like cabbage +leaves. As this did not have its roots extending into the mud the entire +mass of vegetation at times changed its position as the direction of the winds +might change and cause the entire body of vegetation, and again only part of it, +to drift to the opposite side of the lake. The jacanas were, to all appearances, +in no way inconvenienced by these free rides, though there was always the +danger that the eggs might be lost by the move. During my many visits to +this lake from early April until the middle of August I always found the +jacanas playing or feeding over the surface of the vegetation. At times the +green herons, little blue herons, and an occasional gallinule, least bittern, or +redwing would be seen feeding on the surface of the lake.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_325">[Pg 325]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Courtship.</i>—He refers to the courtship, which must be a very +pretty performance, as follows:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>During courtship the birds raise their wings over their backs very much as +the Bartramian sandpipers do and flirt their wings at each other as if they +were attempting to strike one another with the sharp spurs with which their +wings are armed.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Nesting.</i>—In the above locality, Mr. Gillin found 38 nests of this +jacana between April 25 and August 15, 1923, of which he says:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>I sometimes surprised the birds on their nests, but as a usual thing they +would leave the nest at the first alarm. The number of eggs was invariably +four, though in one case I collected a set of three. The nests consisted of a +few bits of green leaves of cat-tails and small pieces of the green leaves of the +plants on which they nested, in all nests containing fresh eggs, though in cases +where the eggs were incubated the nest material had sometimes turned brown. +There was merely enough material to prevent the eggs from rolling apart or +falling through into the water, though in most cases the bottom side of the +eggs was laying in the water. One day while watching the lake from a blind +I saw a jacana go to its eggs and stand over them apparently shading them +from the hot sun; this position was maintained for five or six minutes; no +attempt was made to warm the eggs by sitting on them; at the end of this +shading of the eggs the birds went back to feeding near by.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>The late Frank B. Armstrong distributed a large number of eggs +of the jacana, taken by his collectors across the Rio Grande in Mexico, +mostly near Tampico or somewhere in the State of Tamaulipas. His +data describe the nests as made of floating weeds or trash on or under +the leaves of lilies or other floating plants, in fresh water ponds.</p> + +<p><i>Eggs.</i>—The jacana’s eggs are as unique as the bird itself, and can +not be mistaken for anything else. They are ovate to short ovate, or +even rounded ovate, in shape; and they are decidedly glossy. The +ground colors vary from “buckthorn brown” or “Isabella color” +to “chamois.” They are well covered with fantastic scrawls and +tangled, fine, pen-like lines of black; these markings are usually +quite evenly distributed, but they are sometimes concentrated more +thickly at either end or in the middle. The set almost invariably +consists of four eggs, but I have records of a few sets of five and of +three; Mr. Gillin’s series consists of 37 sets of four and one set of +three. The measurements of 50 eggs average 30.1 by 23 millimeters; +the eggs showing the four extremes measure <b>31.8</b> by 23.3; 31 by <b>24.1</b>, +<b>28.3</b> by 22.2, and 30.3 by <b>21.7</b> millimeters.</p> + +<p><b>Young.</b>—Mr. Gillin says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The young run as soon as hatched, and in one case, when I came upon a nest +in which the young had just hatched, they dived into the water and swam +under the water for several feet before they came to the surface.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Plumages.</i>—The young jacana in natal down is beautifully marked +with rich colors. A narrow frontal line, the sides of the face and +the entire underparts are white; the crown and nape are “ochraceous +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_326">[Pg 326]</span>orange,” centrally browner, with a black “crow-foot” on the occiput, +and with a black line from the eye to the hind neck, which is dusky +black; the central area of the back and rump is “burnt sienna,” +bordered on each side by a band of “ochraceous buff,” below which +is an indistinct dusky band; the thighs and the inner joints of the +wings are “burnt sienna”; the outer joint of the wing is white; the +tail and sides of the rump are jet black; and the tibia are dusky +black. The bright colors become duller as the chick grows older.</p> + +<p>In fresh juvenal plumage the crown and occiput are “warm +sepia,” the feathers faintly tipped with “cinnamon”; the back and +sides of the neck are brownish black; the back, scapulars and wing +coverts are from “sepia” to “Saccardo’s umber,” the feathers +broadly tipped with “tawny” and with a subterminal dusky bar; a +black stripe extends from the eye to the back side of the neck and a +broad stripe of “cream buff” from the lores, over the eyes to the +nape; the sides of the head, chin, throat, and underparts are white, +suffused with “cream buff” on the breast. A partial postjuvenal +body molt takes place during the fall, or else the edgings entirely +wear away leaving only the plain colors of the upper parts, the juvenal +wing coverts and some of the scapulars. In late winter or early +spring, from January to April, a nearly, if not quite, complete +prenuptial molt takes place, which produces a plumage which is practically +adult, including the frontal shield. I have no data on the +molts of adults. In this plumage the female is decidedly larger, is +somewhat more brightly colored and has a larger frontal shield.</p> + +<p><i>Food.</i>—Mr. Gillin says in his notes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>The food of the jacanas must consist of minute insect life that they are +able to find on this floating vegetation as they are very active and seem to +spend practically all their time feeding, which would lead to the conclusion +that their food is secured in very small morsels or else they require a great +amount of food.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><i>Behavior.</i>—P. L. Jouy says in a letter:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>When standing in reeds or sedge they frequently stretch the neck up +straight on the lookout. They also have a curious habit of extending the +wings and raising them up over the back until they meet. This, I suppose, is +a kind of signal, the green of the primaries being conspicuous for a long distance +when in this position. On wounding one of these birds I found that it +was a very fair swimmer, and when I overtook it, it dived, to my astonishment, +with as much confidence as a grebe, and I never saw it again.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>Mr. Gillin writes:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p>On three different occasions I had wounded birds submerge themselves about +a foot below the surface of the water for several minutes before I could locate +them and secure them by hand. They clutched whatever was available with +their feet and from above looked just as comfortable under water as a quail +or grouse would be crouching in the leaves of a briar patch.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_327">[Pg 327]</span></p> + +<p><i>Voice.</i>—Mr. Jouy says that “these birds have a noisy, cackling +voice when they take flight.” Mr. Gillin refers to their note as “a +plaintive call of alarm.”</p> + +<p><i>Fall.</i>—In September he found them “in flocks, flying around and +feeding on ponds where” he “was sure that they had not bred.” The +records of this form in Texas and the West Indian form in Florida +were probably due to such post-breeding wanderings.</p> + + +<p class="p2 center"><span class="allsmcap">DISTRIBUTION</span> +</p> + +<p><i>Range.</i>—The Mexican jacana is found in Mexico and the lower Rio +Grande valley in Texas. The range extends north to Sinaloa (Mazatlan); +and southern Texas (Brownsville). East to Texas (Brownsville); +Tamaulipas (Alta Mira, and Tampico); Vera Cruz (Jalapa, +Alvarado, Tlacotalpan, and Cosamaloapam); Tabasco (Barra de +Santa Ana, San Juan Bautista, and Teapa); and Quintana Roo +(Cozumel Island). South to Quintana Roo (Cozumel Island); +Chiapas (Tonala); Oaxaca (Zanatepec and Santa Efigenia); and +Guerrero (Acapulco). West to Guerrero (Acapulco); Michoacan +(Lake Patzcuaro); Colima (Rio Coahuayana, and Manzanillo); +Jalisco (Zapotlan, Ocotlan, and Guadalajara); Nayarit (Tepic, San +Blas, and Santiago); and Sinaloa (Mazatlan).</p> + +<p>In October, 1899, a specimen of jacana was killed on Pelican Bay, +Lake Okeechobee, Fla. (Mearns, 1902); and H. H. Bailey (1925) +reports another seen by his father in Osceola County, Fla., in +March, 1911. The first of these has been tentatively referred by +Ridgway (1919) to <i>Jacana s. violacea</i>, a race found in Cuba, Haiti, +Jamaica, and Porto Rico.</p> + +<p><i>Egg dates.</i>—Northeastern Mexico: 68 records, April 25 to August +15; 34 records, May 28 to July 13.</p> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_328"></a><a id="Page_329"></a>[Pg 329]</span></p> +<h2 style="display: none; visibility: hidden;">REFERENCES TO PUBLICATIONS</h2> +<p class="h2head"> +REFERENCES TO PUBLICATIONS +</p> +</div> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Aiken, Charles Edward Howard</span>, and <span class="smcap">Warren, Edward Royal</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1914—The Birds of El Paso County, Colorado.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Alexander, Wilfrid Backhouse.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1926—Notes on a Visit to North Queensland. The Emu, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 25, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 245–260.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Audubon, John James.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1840—The Birds of America, 1840–1844.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Aughey, Samuel.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1878—Notes on the Nature of the Food of Birds of Nebraska. First Report +U. S. Entomological Commission, Appendix 2.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bailey, Alfred Marshall.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1925–26—A Report on the Birds of Northwestern Alaska and Regions +Adjacent to Bering Strait. Part 6. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 27, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +232–238.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bailey, Florence Merriam.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1916—A Populous Shore. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 18, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 100–110.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bailey, Harold Harris.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1913—The Birds of Virginia.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bailey, Harry Balch.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1876—Notes on birds found breeding on Cobb’s Island, Va., between May 25 +and May 29, 1875. Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 1, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 24–28.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bancroft, Griffing.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1927—Breeding Birds of Scammon’s Lagoon, Lower California. The Condor, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 29, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 29–57.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Barrows, Walter Bradford.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1912—Michigan Bird Life.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bartsch, Paul.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1922—A Visit to Midway Island. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 39, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 481–488.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bates, John Mallory.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1907—The Bartramian Sandpiper. Bird-Lore, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 9, p. 84.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1916—Incubation Period of Killdeer. The Wilson Bulletin, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 28, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +150–151.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Baynard, Oscar Edward.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1914—Photographing Birds’ Nests. Bird-Lore, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 16, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 471–477.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Beaupre, Edwin.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1917—The American Golden Plover in Eastern Ontario. The Ottawa +Naturalist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 31, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 29–31.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Benners, George B.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1887—A Collecting Trip in Texas. Ornithologist and Oologist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 12, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +49–52, 65–69, and 81–84.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bergtold, William Henry.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1917—A Study of the Incubation Periods of Birds.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1926—Passerine Birds Eating Trout Fry. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 43, p. 558.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bigelow, Henry Bryant.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1902—Birds of the Northeastern Coast of Labrador. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 19, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 24–31.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_330">[Pg 330]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bishop, Louis Bennett.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1900—Birds of the Yukon Region. North American Fauna, <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 19.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bradbury, William Chase.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1918—Notes on the Nesting of the Mountain Plover. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 20, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 157–163.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bretherton, Bernard J.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1896—Kodiak Island. A Contribution to the Avifauna of Alaska. The +Oregon Naturalist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 3, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 45–49; 61–64; 77–79; 100–102.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Brewer, Thomas Mayo.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1878—Changes in our North American Fauna. Bulletin of the Nuttall +Ornithological Club, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 3, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 49–52.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Brewster, William.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1887—Three New Forms of North American Birds. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 4, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 145–149.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1902—Birds of the Cape Region of Lower California. Bulletin of the +Museum of Comparative Zoölogy at Harvard College, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 41, <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 1.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1925—The Birds of the Lake Umbagog Region of Maine. Bulletin of the +Museum of Comparative Zoölogy at Harvard College, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 66, +Part 2.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Brooks, Allan</span> [<span class="smcap">Cyril</span>].</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1924—Two New Sandpiper Records for California. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 26, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 37–38.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Brooks, Winthrop Sprague.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1915—Notes on Birds from East Siberia and Arctic Alaska. Bulletin of +the Museum of Comparative Zoölogy at Harvard College.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Brown, William James.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1912—Additional Notes on the Birds of Newfoundland. The Ottawa Naturalist, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 26, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 93–98.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1916—Killdeer Plover. The Ottawa Naturalist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 30, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 113–114.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bryant, Harold Child.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1914—A Survey of the Breeding Grounds of Ducks in California in 1914. +The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 16, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 217–239.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1914<i>a</i>—Bird Destroyers of Grasshoppers in California. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 31, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +168–177.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Bryant, Walter</span> (<span class="smcap">Pierce</span>) E.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1890—A Catalogue of the Birds of Lower California, Mexico. Proceedings +California Academy of Sciences, ser. 2, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 2, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 237–320.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Burns, Franklin Lorenzo.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1915—Comparative Periods in Deposition and Incubation of Some North +American Birds. The Wilson Bulletin, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 27, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 275–286.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Cahoon, John Cyrus.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1888—The Shore Birds of Cape Cod. Ornithologist and Oologist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 13, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 121–124; 129–132; 153–156.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Cameron, Ewen Somerled.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1907—The Birds of Custer and Dawson Counties, Montana. The Auk, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 24, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 241–270.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Carroll, W. J.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1910—The Eskimo Curlew or Doughbird. Forest and Stream, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 74, +p. 372.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Chadbourne, Arthur Patterson.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1889—An Unusual Flight of Killdeer Plover (<i>Aegialitis vocifera</i>) along +the New England Coast. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 6, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 255–263.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_331">[Pg 331]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Chambers, Willie Lee.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1901—Curious Nest of Anna’s Hummingbird. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 3, p. 105.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1904—The Snowy Plover. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 6, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 139–140.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Chapman, Abel.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1889—Bird Life of the Borders.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Chapman, Frank Michler.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1891—On the Birds Observed Near Corpus Christi, Texas, during Parts +of March and April, 1891. Bulletin of the American Museum of +Natural History, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 3, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 315–328.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1912—Handbook of Birds of Eastern North America.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1926—The Distribution of Bird Life in Ecuador.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Chislett, Ralph.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1923—The Whimbrel in Shetland. British Birds, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 17, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 150–154.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1925—Turnstones on a Baltic Islet. British Birds, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 19, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 2–9.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Clark, Austin Hobart.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1905—The Migration of Certain Shore Birds. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 22, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 134–140.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1905<i>a</i>—Shore Birds Eating Small Fish. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 22, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 208–209.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1910—The Birds Collected and Observed During the Cruise of the United +States Fisheries Steamer “Albatross” in the North Pacific Ocean, +and in the Bering, Okhotsk, Japan, and Eastern Seas, from April +to December, 1906. Proceedings of the U. S. National Museum, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 38, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 25–74.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Cleaves, Howard Henderson.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1908—Sandpiper in a Tree. The Journal of the Maine Ornithological +Society, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 10, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 85–86.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Conover, Henry Boardman.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1926—Game Birds of the Hooper Bay Region, Alaska. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 43, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 162–180; 303–318.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Cooke, Wells Woodbridge.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1897—The Birds of Colorado. The State Agricultural College, Bulletin 37.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1912—Distribution and Migration of North American Shore Birds. United +States Department of Agriculture, Biological Survey Bulletin <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> +35, Revised.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Coues, Elliott.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1874—Birds of the North-West.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Criddle, Norman.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1908—Some Bird Habits. The Ottawa Naturalist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 22, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 153–156.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Dall, William Healey.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1873—Notes on the Avifauna of the Aleutian Islands, from Unalaska, +Eastward.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Davies, Sutton A.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1895—In Quest of Birds on the Muonio River. Zoologist, Third Series, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 19, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 326–335.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Dawson, William Leon.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1909—The Birds of Washington.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1911—Another Fortnight on the Farallones. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 13, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 171–183.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1923—The Birds of California.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Dewar John M.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1908—Notes on the Oyster catcher. Zoologist, 1908, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 201–212.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_332">[Pg 332]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Dill, Homer R.</span>, and <span class="smcap">Bryan, William Alanson</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1912—Report of an Expedition to Laysan Island in 1911. United States +Department of Agriculture, Biological Survey, Bulletin <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 42.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Dixon, Joseph.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1918—The Nesting Grounds and Nesting Habits of the Spoon-billed Sandpiper. +The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 35, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 387–404.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1927—The Surf-bird’s Secret. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 29, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 3–16.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Doolittle, Edward Arthur.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1923—Occurrence of Buff-breasted Sandpiper in Lake County, Ohio. The +Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 40, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 691–692.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Dutcher, William.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1892—A specimen of Numenius arquatus said to have been taken on Long +Island, N. Y. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 9, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 390–392.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Dwight, Jonathan.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1893—Summer Birds of Prince Edward Island. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 10, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 1–15.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Elliot, Daniel Giraud.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1895—North American Shore Birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Erichsen, Walter Jefferson.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1921—Notes on the Habits of the Breeding Water Birds of Chatham +County, Georgia. The Wilson Bulletin, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 33, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 16–28; 69–82.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Evans, Edward</span>, and <span class="smcap">Sturge, Wilson</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1859—Notes on the Birds of Western Spitzbergen, as observed in 1855. +The Ibis, 1859, p. 171.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Farley, John Austin.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1919—Mating “Song” of the Piping Plover. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 36, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 566–567.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Farren, William.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1910—In the “British Bird Book,” edited by F. B. Kirkman, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 340–356.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Feilden, Henry Wemyss.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1889—On the Birds of Barbados. The Ibis, 1889, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 477–503.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Ferry, John Farwell.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1908—Notes from the Diary of a Naturalist in Northern California. The +Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 10, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 30–44.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Fisher, Albert Kenrick.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1893—The Death Valley Expedition, North American Fauna, <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 7.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Forbush, Edward Howe.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1912—A History of the Game Birds, Wild Fowl, and Shore Birds of Massachusetts +and Adjacent States.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1925—Birds of Massachusetts and Other New England States.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Gabrielson, Ira Noel.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1922—Short Notes on the Life Histories of Various Species of Birds. The +Wilson Bulletin, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 34, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 193–210.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Gätke, Heinrich.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1895—Heligoland as an Ornithological Observatory.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Gibson, Ernest.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1920—Further Ornithological Notes from the Neighborhood of Cape San +Antonio, Province of Buenos Aires. The Ibis, 1920, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 1–97.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Giraud, Jacob Post.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1844—The Birds of Long Island.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Goebel, H.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">Numerous articles on eggs of Russian and Siberian Birds chiefly published +in the Zeitschrift für Oologie (und Ornithologie).</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Gordon, Seton Paul.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1915—Hill Birds of Scotland.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_333">[Pg 333]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Goss, Nathaniel Stickney.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1891—History of the Birds of Kansas.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Grinnell, George Bird.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1916—Willets in Migration. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 33, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 198–199.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Grinnell, Joseph.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1900—Birds of the Kotzebue Sound Region. Pacific Coast Avifauna, <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 1.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1909—Birds and Mammals of the 1907 Alexander Expedition to Southeastern +Alaska. University of California Publications in Zoology, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 5, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 171–264.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1910—Birds of the 1908 Alexander Alaska Expedition. University of California +Publications in Zoology, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 5, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 361–428.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Grinnell, Joseph</span>, <span class="smcap">Bryant, Harold Child</span>, and <span class="smcap">Storer, Tracy Irwin</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1918—The Game Birds of California.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hancock, John.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1874—(In Natural History Transactions of Northumberland and Durham, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 6 (1873), published in 1874). “A Catalogue of the Birds of +Northumberland and Durham.”</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hanna, G. Dallas.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1920—New and Interesting Records of Pribilof Island Birds. The Condor, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 22, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 173–175.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hantzsch, Bernhard.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1905—Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Vogelwelt Islands.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hart, H. Chichester.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1880—Notes on the Ornithology of the British Polar Expedition, 1875–76. +Zoologist, 1880, p. 205.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hartert, Ernst.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1920—Die Vögel der Paläarktischen Fauna.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Haviland, Maud Doria.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1915—A Summer on the Yenesei.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1915<i>a</i>—Notes on the Breeding Habits of the Asiatic Golden Plover. British +Birds, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 9, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 82–89.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Heath, Harold.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1915—Birds Observed on Forrester Island, Alaska, during the Summer of</p> + +<p class="unindent">1913. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 17, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 20–41.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Henderson, Archibald Douglas.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1923—Nesting of the Solitary Sandpiper. The Oologist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 40, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 55–56.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Henderson, Junius.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1927—The Practical Value of Birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Henshaw, Henry Wetherbee.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1902—Birds of the Hawaiian Islands.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1910—Migration of the Pacific Plover to and from the Hawaiian Islands. +The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 27, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 245–262.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hewitson, William Chapman.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1856—Eggs of British Birds. Third Edition.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hoffmann, Ralph.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1904—A Guide to the Birds of New England and Eastern New York.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hoskin, H. G.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1893—Nesting of the Mountain Plover. The Oologist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 10, p. 230.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Howell, Alfred Brazier.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1917—Birds of the Islands off the Coast of Southern California. Pacific +Coast Avifauna, <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 12.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_334">[Pg 334]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Howell, Arthur Holmes.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1906—Birds that Eat the Cotton Boll Weevil. United States Department of +Agriculture. Biological Survey Bulletin. 25.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1924—Birds of Alabama.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hoxie, Walter John.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1887—An Egg Lifter. Ornithologist and Oologist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 12, p. 129.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hudson, William Henry.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1920—Birds of La Plata.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1922—A Hind in Richmond Park.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Hunter, Katharine Upham.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1916—An Upland Plover’s Nest. Bird-Lore, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 18, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 365–366.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Huxley, Julian Sorel</span>, and <span class="smcap">Montague, F. A.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1925—Studies on the Courtship and Sexual Life of Birds. V. The Oystercatcher. +The Ibis, 1925, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 868–897.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Isely, Dwight.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1912—A List of the Birds of Sedgwick County, Kansas. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 29, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 25–44.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Jewel, Lindsey Louin.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1913—Some North American Birds in Panama. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 30, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +422–429.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1915—The Diving Instinct of Shore-birds. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 32, p. 227.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Jewell, H. W.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1909—Feeding Habits of the Sandpiper. The Journal of the Maine Ornithological +Society, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 11, p. 123.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Job, Herbert Keightley.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1905—Wild Wings.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1911—The Spotted Sandpiper. Bird-Lore, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 13, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 221–224.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Jones, Lynds.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1903—The Birds of Ohio (Dawson and Jones).</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Jourdain, Francis Charles Robert.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1907—On the Eggs of some American Limicolae. The Ibis, 1907, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 517–518.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1912.—The Ruff, British Bird Book (Kirkman), <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 3, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 448–495.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Kalmbach, Edwin Richard.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1914—Birds in Relation to the Alfalfa Weevil. United States Department +of Agriculture, Bulletin 107.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Kelso, John Edward Harvey.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1926—Diving and Swimming Activities Displayed by the Limicolae. The +Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 43, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 92–93.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Knight, Ora Willis.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1908—The Birds of Maine.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Kopman, Henry Hazlitt.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1905—A Killdeer’s Mishap. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 22, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 209–210.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Lacey, Howard.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1911—The Birds of Kerrville, Texas, and Vicinity. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 28, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +200–219.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Lewis, Harrison Flint.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1920—The Willet (<i>Catoptrophorus semipalmatus semipalmatus</i>) in Nova +Scotia. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 37, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 581–582.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Littlejohn, Chase.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1904—The Capture of Totanus glareola in Alaska. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> +6, p. 138.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">McAtee, Waldo Lee.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1911—Our Vanishing Shorebirds. Biological Survey—Circular <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 79.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_335">[Pg 335]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">McAtee, Waldo Lee</span>, and <span class="smcap">Beal, Foster Ellenborough Lascelles</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1912—Some Common Game, Aquatic and Rapacious Birds in Relation to +Man. United States Department of Agriculture, Farmers’ Bulletin, +497.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Mackay, George Henry.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1891—The Habits of the Golden Plover (<i>Charadrius dominicus</i>) in Massachusetts. +The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 8, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 17–24.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1892—Habits of the Black-bellied Plover (<i>Charadrius squatarola</i>) in Massachusetts. +The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 9, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 143–152.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1892<i>a</i>—Tryngites subruficollis. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 9, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 389–390.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1892<i>b</i>—Habits of the Hudsonian Curlew in Massachusetts. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> +9, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 345–352.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1892<i>c</i>—Habits of the Eskimo Curlew (<i>Numenius borealis</i>) in New England. +The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 9, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 16–21.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Macmillan, Donald Baxter.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1918—Four Years in the White North.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Manniche, Arner Ludvig Valdemar.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1910—The Terrestrial Mammals and Birds of Northeast Greenland. +Meddelelser om Grønland, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 45.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Maynard, Charles Johnson.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1896—The Birds of Eastern North America.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Mearns, Edgar Alexander.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1890—Observations on the Avifauna of Portions of Arizona. The Auk, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 7, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 45–55.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Merrill, James Cushing.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1898—Spotted Sandpiper Removing its Young. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 15, p. 52.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Mousley, Henry.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1916—Five Years Personal Notes and Observations on the Birds of Hatley, +Stanstead County, Quebec, 1911–1915. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 33, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 57–73.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Munn, Philip Winchester.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1921—Notes on the Birds of Alcudia, Majorca. The Ibis, 1921, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 672–719.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Munro, James Alexander.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1911—The Spring Migration of Birds at Fisherman’s Island, Toronto, 1910. +The Ottawa Naturalist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 25, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 27–31 and 43–48.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Murdoch, John.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1885—Report of the International Polar Expedition to Point Barrow, +Alaska, Part 4, Natural History.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Murie, Olaus Johan.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1924—Nesting Records of the Wandering Tattler and Surf-bird in Alaska. +The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 41, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 231–237.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Murphy, Robert Cushman.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1925—Notes on Certain Species and Races of Oyster-catchers. American +Museum Novitates, <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 194.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Naumann, Johann Friedrich.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1887–1895—Naturgeschichte der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Edited by C. R. +Hennicke.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Nelson, Edward William.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1880—An Afternoon in the Vicinity of St. Michael’s, Alaska. Bulletin of the +Nuttall Ornithological Club, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 5, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 33–36.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1883—The Birds of Bering Sea and the Arctic Ocean. Cruise of the +Revenue Steamer Corwin in Alaska and the N. W. Arctic Ocean in +1881.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1887—Report upon Natural History Collections made In Alaska.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Nelson, Mrs. Henry W.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1900—A Pair of Killdeer. Bird-Lore, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 2, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 148–150.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_336">[Pg 336]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Newton, Alfred.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1896—A Dictionary of Birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Nichols, John Treadwell.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1920—Limicoline Voices. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 37, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 519–540.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Noble, Frank T.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1904—Feeding Habits of the Turnstone. Journal of Maine Ornithological +Society, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 6, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 57–59.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Nuttall, Thomas.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1834—A Manual of the Ornithology of the United States and Canada. +Water Birds.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Osgood, Wilfred Hudson.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1901—Natural History of the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia. +North American Fauna <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 21, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 7–38.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1907—Probable Breeding of the Wandering Tattler in the Interior of +Alaska. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 24, p. 340.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1909—Biological Investigations in Alaska and Yukon Territory. North +American Fauna <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 30.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Osmaston, Bertram Beresford.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1927—Notes on the Birds of Kashmir. Journal of the Bombay Natural +History Society, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 32, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 147–148.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Paget-Wilkes, Arthur Hamilton.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1922—On the Breeding Habits of the Turnstone as Observed in Spitsbergen. +British Birds, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 15, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 172–179.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Palmer, William.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1899—The Avifauna of the Pribilof Islands. The Fur-Seals and Fur-Seal +Islands of the North Pacific Ocean. Part 3, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 355–431.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1909—Instinctive Stillness in Birds. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 26, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 23–36.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Patten, Charles Joseph.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1906—The Aquatic Birds of Great Britain and Ireland.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Pearse, Theed.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1924—Display of the Killdeer Plover. The Canadian Field Naturalist, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 38, p. 193.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Pearson, Henry John.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1896—Notes on Birds Observed in Russian Lapland, Kolguev, and Novaya +Zemlya, in 1895. The Ibis, 1896, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 199–225.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1904—Three Summers among the Birds of Russian Lapland.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Philipp, Phillip Bernard.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1910—Birds Observed in the Carolinas. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 27, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 312–322.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1925—Notes on Some Summer Birds of the Magdalen Islands. The Canadian +Field-Naturalist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 39, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 75–78.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Philipp, Phillip Bernard</span>, and <span class="smcap">Bowdish, Beecher Scoville</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1917—Some Summer Birds of Northern New Brunswick. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> +34, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 265–275.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Pickwell, Gayle.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1925—Some Nesting Habits of the Belted Piping Plover. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 42, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 326–332.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Popham, Hugh Leyborne.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1897—Notes on Birds Observed on the Yenisei River, Siberia, in 1895. The +Ibis, 1897, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 89–108.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1898—Further Notes on Birds Observed on the Yenisei River, Siberia. The +Ibis, 1898, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 489–520.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1901—Supplementary Notes on the Birds of the Yenisei River. The Ibis, +1901, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 449–458.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_337">[Pg 337]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Poynting, Frank.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1895–96—Eggs of British Birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Praeger, William Emilius.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1891—Protective Coloration In the Genus <i>Aegialitis</i>. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 8, +p. 236.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Preble, Edward Alexander.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1902—A Biological Investigation of the Hudson Bay Region. North American +Fauna <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 22.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Preble, Edward Alexander</span>, and <span class="smcap">McAtee, Waldo Lee</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1923—A Biological Survey of Pribilof Islands, Alaska. North American +Fauna <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 46.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Raine, Walter.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1904—Discovery of the Eggs of Solitary Sandpiper. The Ottawa Naturalist, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 18, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 135–141.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Reid, Philip Savile Grey.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1884—The Birds of Bermuda. Part 4 in Contributions to the Natural +History of the Bermudas. Bulletin United States National +Museum <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 25.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Rey, Eugene.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1905—Die Eier der Vögel Mitteleuropas.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Rich, Walter Herbert.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1907—Feathered Game of the Northeast.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Ridgway, Robert.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1919—The Birds of North and Middle America, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 8.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Robbins, Charles Albert.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1919—A Colony of Cape Cod Piping Plover. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 26, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 351–355.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Roberts, Thomas Sadler.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1919—Water Birds of Minnesota Past and Present. Biennial Report of +the State Game and Fish Commission of Minnesota, for the +Biennial Period Ending July 31, 1918.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Rockwell, Robert Blanchard.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1912—Notes on the Wading Birds of the Barr Lake Region, Colorado. The +Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 14, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 117–131.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Roosevelt, Robert Barnwell.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1884—Florida and the Game Water Birds of the Atlantic Coast and the +Lakes of the United States.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Rowan, William.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1926–27—Notes on Alberta Waders included in the British List. British +Birds, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 20, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 2–10; 34–42; 82–90; 138–145; 186–192.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1923—Migrations of the Golden and Black-bellied Plovers in Alberta. The +Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 25, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 21–23.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Samuels, Edward Augustus.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1883—Our Northern and Eastern Birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Sandys, Edwin.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1904—Upland Game Birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Saunders, Aretas Andrews.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1926—The Summer Birds of Central New York Marshes. Roosevelt Wild +Life Bulletin, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 3, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 335–475.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Scott, William Earl Dodge.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1892—Observations on the Birds of Jamaica, West Indies. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> +9, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 9–15.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_338">[Pg 338]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Seebohm, Henry.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1884—History of British Birds.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1888—The Geographical Distribution of the Family Charadriidae, or the +Plovers, Sandpipers, Snipes, and their Allies.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1890—On the Birds of the Bonin Islands. The Ibis, 1890, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 95–108.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1901—The Birds of Siberia.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Selous, Edmund.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1901—Bird Watching.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1906–1907—Observations on Sexual Selection in Birds. Zoologist, 1906, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 201–219, 285–294, 419–428; 1907, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 60–65, 161–182, 367–381.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Sennett, George Burritt.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1879—Further Notes on the Ornithology of the Lower Rio Grande of Texas. +Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 5, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 371–440.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Shelley, Lewis O.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1925—A Sandpiper’s Wooing. Bird-Lore, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 27, p. 107.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Sherman, Althea Rosina.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1916—“Incubation Period of Killdeer.” The Wilson Bulletin, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 28, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +195–196.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Shick, Charles Samuel.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1890—Birds found breeding on Seven Mile Beach, New Jersey. The Auk, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 7, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 326–329.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Silloway, Perley Milton.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1900—Notes on the Long-billed Curlew. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 2, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 79–82.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1903—Birds of Fergus County, Montana. Bulletin <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 1, Fergus County +Free High School.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Smith, William Gilbert.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1888—Breeding Habits of the Mountain Plover. Ornithologist and Oologist, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 13, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 187–188.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Snyder, Lester Lynne.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1924—Peculiar Behavior of the Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia). +The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 41, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 341–342.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Spurrell, J. A.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1917—History of a Killdeer’s Nest. The Wilson Bulletin, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 29, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +101–103.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Stanford, John Keith.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1927—Field Notes from East Suffolk. British Birds, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 21, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 75–80.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Stejneger, Leonhard.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1885—Results of Ornithological Explorations in the Commander Islands +and in Kamtschatka. Bulletin of the United States National +Museum <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 29.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Stockard, Charles Rupert.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1905—Nesting Habits of Birds in Mississippi. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 22, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +146–158.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Street, John Fletcher.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1923—On the Nesting Grounds of the Solitary Sandpiper and the Lesser +Yellowlegs. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 40, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 577–583.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Sutton, George Miksch.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1925—Swimming and Diving Activities of the Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis +macularia). The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 42, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 580–581.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Swainson, William</span>, and <span class="smcap">Richardson, John</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1831—Fauna Boreali-Americana, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 2, Birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_339">[Pg 339]</span></p> +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Swarth, Harry Schelwaldt.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1911—Birds and Mammals of the 1909 Alexander Alaska Expedition. +University of California Publications in Zoology, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 7, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 9–172.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Swenk, Myron Harmon.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1915—The Eskimo Curlew and its Disappearance. Annual Report of the +Smithsonian Institution for 1915, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 325–340.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1926—The Eskimo Curlew in Nebraska. The Wilson Bulletin, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 38, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +117–118.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Taverner, Percy Algernon.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1919—The Birds of the Red Deer River, Alberta. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 36, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +1–21.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1926—Birds of Western Canada.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Terrill, Lewis McIver.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1911—Changes in the Status of Certain Birds in the Vicinity of Montreal, +P. Q. The Ottawa Naturalist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 25, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 57–63.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Thayer, Gerald Handerson.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1909—Concealing Coloration in the Animal Kingdom.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Thayer, John Eliot</span>, and <span class="smcap">Bangs, Outram</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1914—Notes on the Birds and Mammals of the Arctic Coast of East +Siberia. Birds. Proceedings of the New England Zoological Club, +<abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 5, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 1–66.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p>“<span class="smcap">Thompson, Ernest Evan</span>,” <span class="smcap">Seton, Ernest Thompson</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1890—The Birds of Manitoba. Proceedings of the United States National +Museum, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 13, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 457–643.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Thurston, Henry.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1913—Wilson’s Plover. The Warbler, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 7, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 22–24.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Torrey, Bradford.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1885—Birds in the Bush.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1913—Field Days in California.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Townsend, Charles Wendell.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1905—The Birds of Essex County, Massachusetts. Memoirs of the Nuttall +Ornithological Club, <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 3.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1913—Some More Labrador Notes. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 30, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 1–10.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1920—Supplement to the Birds of Essex County, Massachusetts. Memoirs +of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 5.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1920<i>a</i>—The Willet in Nova Scotia. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 37, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 582–583.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Trevor-Battye, Aubyn.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1895—Icebound on Kolguev.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1897—The Birds of Spitsbergen, as at present determined. The Ibis, 1897, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 574–600.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Trotter, Spencer.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1904—Some Nova Scotia Birds. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 21, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 55–64.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Tufts, Robie Wilfred.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1922—Willet Census in Nova Scotia. The Canadian Field Naturalist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> +36, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 152–153.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1925—Further Notes on the Willet in Nova Scotia. The Canadian Field +Naturalist, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 39, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 116–117.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Turner, Lucien McShan.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1886—Contributions to the Natural History of Alaska.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Tyler, John Gripper.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1913—Some Birds of the Fresno District, California. Pacific Coast Avifauna +<abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 9.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1916—Migration and Field Notes from Fresno County, California. The +Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 18, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 167–169.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_340">[Pg 340]</span></p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Van Denburgh, John.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1919—Nesting of the Western Willet in California. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 21, +<abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 39–40.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Van Rossem, Adriaan Joseph.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1925—Observations on the Spotted Sandpiper. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 42, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 230–232.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Warren, Edward Royal.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1912—Some North-central Colorado Bird Notes. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 14, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +81–104.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Wayne, Arthur Trezevant.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1910—Birds of South Carolina. Contributions from the Charleston Museum, +<abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 1.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Wetmore, Alexander.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1916—Birds of Porto Rico. United States Department of Agriculture +Bulletin, <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 326.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1926—Observations on the Birds of Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, and +Chile. United States National Museum, Bulletin 133.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1927—Our Migrant Shorebirds in Southern South America. United States +Department of Agriculture. Technical Bulletin <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 26.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Wheelwright, Horace William.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1864—“An Old Bushman.” A Spring and Summer in Lapland.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1865—Ten Years in Sweden.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Whistler, Hugh.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1925—The Birds of Lahul, N. W. Himalaya. The Ibis, 1925, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 203–205.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Whittle, Charles Livy.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1922—Miscellaneous Bird Notes from Montana. The Condor, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 24, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> +73–81.</p> + +<p class="unindent">1928—A Lapwing Recovery in Newfoundland. Bulletin of the Northeastern +Bird-Banding Association, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 4, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 69–70.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Wickersham, Cornelius Wendell.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1902—Sickle-billed Curlew. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 19, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 353–356.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Willett, George.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1912—Birds of the Pacific Slope of Southern California. Pacific Coast +Avifauna, <abbr title="Number">No.</abbr> 7.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Williams, Robert White.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1919—Winter Birds of Goose Creek, Florida. The Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 36, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 45–46.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Wilson, Alexander.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1832—American Ornithology.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Witherby, Harry Forbes.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1919—Notes on Birds observed near Dunkerque, Nord, France. British +Birds, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 12, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 194–205.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Witherby, Harry Forbes</span>, and <span class="smcap">Others</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1920—A Practical Handbook of British Birds.</p> +</blockquote> + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Wright, Albert Hazen</span>, and <span class="smcap">Harper, Francis</span>.</p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1913—A Biological Reconnaissance of Okefinokee Swamp: The Birds. The +Auk, <abbr title="volume">vol.</abbr> 30, <abbr title="pages">pp.</abbr> 477–505.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<p class="unindent"><span class="smcap">Yarrell, William.</span></p> + +<blockquote> +<p class="unindent">1871—History of British Birds. Fourth edition, 1871–85. Revised and +enlarged by Alfred Newton and Howard Saunders.</p> +</blockquote> + + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_341">[Pg 341]</span></p> +<div class="chapter"> + <h2 style="display: none; visibility: hidden;">Plates</h2> + <p class="center muchlarger"><i>Plates</i> + </p> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp48" id="i_plate01" style="max-width: 62.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate01.jpg" alt="Upland Plover"> + <figcaption> + PLATE 1. UPLAND PLOVER. Belleville, Mich., June 17, 1923, presented + by Dr. Frank N. Wilson. + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate02" style="max-width: 39.4375em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate02.jpg" alt="Solitary Sandpiper"> + <figcaption> + PLATE 2. SOLITARY SANDPIPER + <i>Upper</i>: Nesting site of solitary sandpiper, near Belvedere, + Alberta, presented by Mr. Richard C. Harlow. <i>Lower</i>: Solitary + sandpiper, Staten Island, N. Y., presented by Mr. Howard H. Cleaves. + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate03" style="max-width: 39.25em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate03.jpg" alt="Solitary Sandpiper"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 3. SOLITARY SANDPIPER + <i>Upper</i>: Nesting site of solitary sandpiper, Red Lodge, + Alberta, May 29, 1923. <i>Lower</i>: Nest and eggs in above locality. Both + photographs presented by Mr. J. Fletcher Street. Referred to on page 3.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate04" style="max-width: 39.3125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate04.jpg" alt="Willet"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 4. WILLET + <i>Upper</i>: Nesting site of a colony of willets. <i>Lower</i>: + A nest in above colony, Bulls Island, S. C., May 22, 1915. Both photographed + by the author. Referred to on page 29.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate05" style="max-width: 38.6875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate05.jpg" alt="Willet"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 5. WILLET. <i>Upper</i>: Nest of willet in an open situation, Bulls + Island, S. C., May 23, 1915; photographed by the author. Referred to + on page 30. <i>Lower</i>: Willet on its nest in a still more open situation, + Sandy Point, S. C., June 7, 1927; presented by Mr. Roger T. Peterson. + Referred to on page 30.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate06" style="max-width: 39.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate06.jpg" alt="Willet"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 6. WILLET. <i>Upper</i>: Willet watching the passing of a boat + down a tidal creek, near Bulls Bay, S. C.; presented by Mr. Howard H. + Cleaves. <i>Lower</i>: Nest of willet, Merritts Island, Fla., June 2, 1927; presented + by Mr. Donald J. Nicholson.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp100" id="i_plate07" style="max-width: 62.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate07.jpg" alt="Willet"> + <figcaption>PLATE 7. WILLET. Willet on its nest, among sand dunes, near Bulls +Bay, S. C.; presented by Mr. Howard H. Cleaves. The grass pattern is +well illustrated. + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp100" id="i_plate08" style="max-width: 62.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate08.jpg" alt="Western willet"> + <figcaption>PLATE 8. WESTERN WILLET. Western willet on its nest, near Salt +Lake City, Utah; presented by Mr. Clark Blickensderfer. Notice the +protective coloration. +</figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp52" id="i_plate09" style="max-width: 43.625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate09.jpg" alt="Western willet"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 9. WESTERN WILLET. Nest of western willet, near Salt Lake + City, Utah; presented by Mr. Clark Blickensderfer.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate10" style="max-width: 39.625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate10.jpg" alt="Wandering tattler"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 10. WANDERING TATTLER. <i>Upper</i>: Nesting site of wandering + tattler, on the gravel in the foreground, upper Savage valley, Alaska, + July 1, 1925. <i>Lower</i>: Nest of wandering tattler in above locality. Both + photographs presented by Mr. Olaus J. Murie, by courtesy of the Biological + Survey. Referred to on page 43.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate11" style="max-width: 38.75em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate11.jpg" alt="Wandering tattler"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 11. WANDERING TATTLER. <i>Upper</i>: Young wandering tattler, + about 12 days old, Mount McKinley, Alaska, July 8, 1926; presented + by Mr. Joseph Dixon. <i>Lower</i>: Wandering tattler on its nest, + upper valley of Savage River, Alaska, July 1, 1925; presented by Mr. + Olaus J. Murie, by courtesy of the Biological Survey. Referred to on + page 43.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate12" style="max-width: 38.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate12.jpg" alt="Wandering tattler"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 12. WANDERING TATTLER. <i>Upper</i>: Male wandering tattler + feeding in shallow water. <i>Lower</i>: Same bird brooding and talking to + chick. Both photographs presented by Mr. Joseph Dixon and taken by + him at Mount McKinley, Alaska, June 22, 1926.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate13" style="max-width: 38.875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate13.jpg" alt="Upland plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 13. UPLAND PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest of upland plover, Martha’s + Vineyard, Mass., May 26, 1900. Referred to on page 58. <i>Lower</i>: Nest of + upland plover, near Maple Creek, Saskatchewan, June 11, 1906. Referred + to on page 58. Both photographs by the author.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp48" id="i_plate14" style="max-width: 40.0625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate14.jpg" alt="Upland plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 14. UPLAND PLOVER. Nest of upland plover, Columbus, + Ohio; presented by Mr. Edward S. Thomas.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp41" id="i_plate15" style="max-width: 34.625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate15.jpg" alt="Upland plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 15. <i>Upper</i>: UPLAND PLOVER. Young upland plover, Holt + County, Nebr.; presented by Mr. Frank C. Pellett. <i>Lower</i>: SPOTTED + SANDPIPER. Nest of spotted sandpiper, at the base of a mullein stalk, + on the bank of a creek, Bear Creek, Oreg.; presented by Mr. J. E. + Patterson.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp44" id="i_plate16" style="max-width: 36.6875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate16.jpg" alt="Spotted sandpiper"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 16. SPOTTED SANDPIPER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest of spotted sandpiper, + Branchport, N. Y., June 24, 1914; presented by Mr. Verdi Burtch. + <i>Lower</i>: Nest of spotted sandpiper, Columbus, Ohio, June, 1925; presented + by Mr. Edward S. Thomas.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp41" id="i_plate17" style="max-width: 34.6875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate17.jpg" alt="Spotted sandpiper"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 17. SPOTTED SANDPIPER. <i>Upper</i>: Immature spotted sandpiper + swimming. It propelled itself by wings alone while beneath the + surface and by use of the feet, like a phalarope, on the surface. Presented + by Mr. Howard H. Cleaves. <i>Lower</i>: Young spotted sandpiper, + Jamestown, N. Y., June 20, 1925; presented by Mr. Roger T. Peterson.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp45" id="i_plate18" style="max-width: 38.25em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate18.jpg" alt="Spotted sandpiper"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 18. SPOTTED SANDPIPER. <i>Upper</i>: Adult spotted sandpiper + in spring plumage, Staten Island, N. Y.; presented by Mr. Howard H. + Cleaves and by courtesy of Collier’s Weekly and Mr. Edward H. Forbush. + <i>Lower</i>: Immature spotted sandpiper, Staten Island, N. Y.; presented by + Mr. Cleaves.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate19" style="max-width: 39.25em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate19.jpg" alt="Long-billed curlew"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 19. LONG-BILLED CURLEW. <i>Upper</i>: Nest of long-billed + curlew, Bear River marshes, Utah, May 2, 1927. <i>Lower</i>: Adult curlew + on above nest. Both photographs presented by Lieut. L. R. Wolfe.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp44" id="i_plate20" style="max-width: 37.0em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate20.jpg" alt="Long-billed curlew"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 20. LONG-BILLED CURLEW. <i>Upper</i>: Newly hatched young + and pipped eggs of long-billed curlew, near Salt Lake City, Utah; presented + by Mr. Clark Blickensderfer. <i>Lower</i>: Older young, near Crane + Lake, Saskatchewan, June 1, 1905; photographed by the author. Referred + to on page 101.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp42" id="i_plate21" style="max-width: 35.4375em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate21.jpg" alt="Whimbrel"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 21. WHIMBREL. <i>Upper</i>: Whimbrel approaching its egg and + chick in its nest, Shetland Islands, June 24, 1922. <i>Lower</i>: Same bird, + rising to accommodate its chick. Both photographs presented by Mr. + Ralph Chislett.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp43" id="i_plate22" style="max-width: 36.625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate22.jpg" alt="Whimbrel"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 22. WHIMBREL. <i>Upper</i>: Whimbrel on the nest shown below. + <i>Lower</i>: Nest of whimbrel, Shetland Islands, June 11, 1923; presented + by Mr. William E. Glegg.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp44" id="i_plate23" style="max-width: 37.0em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate23.jpg" alt="Bristle-thighed curlew"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 23. <i>Upper</i>: BRISTLE-THIGHED CURLEW. Bristle-thighed + curlew, stealing an egg from a man-o-war-bird’s nest, Laysan Island; + presented by Mr. Donald R. Dickey, by courtesy of the National Geographic + Society. <i>Lower</i>: WHIMBREL. Whimbrel settling down on its + nest, Shetland Islands, June 11, 1923; presented by Mr. William E. + Glegg.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp48" id="i_plate24" style="max-width: 40.375em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate24.jpg" alt="Lapwing"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 24. LAPWING. <i>Upper</i>: Nest of lapwing. <i>Lower</i>: Another nest + of lapwing on a beach. Both photographs presented by Mr. C. W. + Colthrup.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp43" id="i_plate25" style="max-width: 36.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate25.jpg" alt="Dotterel"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 25. DOTTEREL. Two views of dotterels on two different nests, + near the Yenisei River, Siberia; presented by Mrs. Maud D. (Haviland) + Brindley.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate26" style="max-width: 38.8125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate26.jpg" alt="Black-bellied plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 26. BLACK-BELLIED PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Immature black-bellied + plover, Branchport, N. Y., October 3, 1911; presented by Mr. + Verdi Burtch. <i>Lower</i>: Adult male black-bellied plover, Florida Keys, + May, 1903; presented by Mr. Herbert K. Job.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp41" id="i_plate27" style="max-width: 34.625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate27.jpg" alt="Black-bellied plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 27. BLACK-BELLIED PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest and eggs of gray + plover (black-bellied plover) near Yenisei River, Siberia; presented by + Mrs. Maud D. (Haviland) Brindley. <i>Lower</i>: Black-bellied plover on its + nest, near Point Barrow, Alaska, June 20, 1917. A photograph taken by + Mr. T. L. Richardson for the author.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp41" id="i_plate28" style="max-width: 34.3125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate28.jpg" alt="American golden plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 28. AMERICAN GOLDEN PLOVER. Two nests of American + golden plover, Demarcation Point, Alaska, June 23, 1914; presented by + Mr. W. Sprague Brooks.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp50" id="i_plate29" style="max-width: 41.75em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate29.jpg" alt="Pacific golden plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 29. PACIFIC GOLDEN PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Nesting site of + Pacific golden plover. <i>Lower</i>: Nest and eggs of Pacific golden plover. + Both photographs taken by Mr. T. L. Richardson at Unalakleet, Alaska, + for the author.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp44" id="i_plate30" style="max-width: 37.1875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate30.jpg" alt="Pacific golden plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 30. PACIFIC GOLDEN PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Pacific golden plover. + <i>Lower</i>: Pacific golden plover brooding. Both photographs presented by + Mrs. Maud D. (Haviland) Brindley, taken by her near the Yenisei River, + Siberia.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate31" style="max-width: 39.75em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate31.jpg" alt="Killdeer"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 31. KILLDEER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest and eggs of killdeer, Barr Lake, + Colo.; presented by the Colorado Museum of Natural History. <i>Lower</i>: + Nest and eggs of killdeer, Manitoba; presented by Herbert K. Job.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate32" style="max-width: 39.0625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate32.jpg" alt="Killdeer"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 32. KILLDEER. <i>Upper</i>: Killdeer at its nest, near Kansas City, + Mo. <i>Lower</i>: Nest and eggs of the same bird. Both photographs presented + by Dr. A. H. Cordier.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate33" style="max-width: 39.125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate33.jpg" alt="Killdeer"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 33. KILLDEER. <i>Upper</i>: Downy young killdeers; photograph + by H. H. Pittman. <i>Lower</i>: Nest and eggs of killdeers, Banff, Alberta; + presented by Mr. Dan McCown.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp50" id="i_plate34" style="max-width: 41.875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate34.jpg" alt="Killdeer"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 34. KILLDEER. <i>Upper</i>: Killdeer settling on its nest. <i>Lower</i>: + Young killdeer, a few days old. Both photographs presented by Mr. + Howard H. Cleaves and by courtesy of the National Geographic Society. + Taken on Staten Island, N. Y.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate35" style="max-width: 39.125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate35.jpg" alt="Semipalmated plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 35. SEMIPALMATED PLOVER. Two nests of semipalmated + plover, Magdalen Islands, Quebec, June 20, 1904; photographed by the + author.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp48" id="i_plate36" style="max-width: 40.0em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate36.jpg" alt="Semipalmated plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 36. SEMIPALMATED PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest and eggs of + semipalmated plover, Atlin, British Columbia, June 10, 1924; presented + by Mr. Harry S. Swarth. <i>Lower</i>: Semipalmated plover, Santa Barbara, + Calif., May 2, 1913; presented by Mr. W. Leon Dawson.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp100" id="i_plate37" style="max-width: 62.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate37.jpg" alt="Semipalmated plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 37. SEMIPALMATED PLOVER. Nesting site of semipalmated + plover, Atlin Lake, British Columbia, June 10, 1924; presented by Mr. + Harry S. Swarth.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate38" style="max-width: 39.6875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate38.jpg" alt="Semipalmated plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 38. SEMIPALMATED PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Semipalmated plover + brooding young, Magdalen Islands, June 20, 1904; presented by Mr. + Herbert K. Job. <i>Lower</i>: Downy young semipalmated plover, Baffin + Island, July 29, 1925; presented by Mr. J. Dewey Soper and by courtesy + of the Department of Mines, Canada.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp49" id="i_plate39" style="max-width: 41.125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate39.jpg" alt="Ringed plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 39. RINGED PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest and eggs of ringed plover, + presented by Mr. C. W. Colthrup. <i>Lower</i>: Ringed plover at its nest; + presented by Mrs. Maud D. (Haviland) Brindley.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp49" id="i_plate40" style="max-width: 41.3125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate40.jpg" alt="Piping plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 40. PIPING PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest and five eggs of piping + plover, Dartmouth, Mass., June 16, 1916; photographed by the author. + <i>Lower</i>: Nest and eggs of piping plover, Bay Point, Ohio, June, 1925; + presented by Mr. Edward S. Thomas.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate41" style="max-width: 39.625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate41.jpg" alt="Piping plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 41. PIPING PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Piping plover incubating. <i>Lower</i>: + Piping plover standing at its nest. Both photographs taken by the + author, Chatham, Mass., June 2, 1921.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate42" style="max-width: 39.1875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate42.jpg" alt="Piping plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 42. PIPING PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest and eggs of piping plover, + Stump Lake, N. Dak., June 15, 1901; photographed by the author. + <i>Lower</i>: Piping plover chicks, about three days old, Martha’s Vineyard, + Mass.; presented by Mr. Howard H. Cleaves.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp44" id="i_plate43" style="max-width: 37.25em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate43.jpg" alt="Snowy plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 43. <i>Upper</i>: SNOWY PLOVER. Nest and eggs of snowy plover, + Orange County, Calif., June 11, 1916; presented by Mr. Wright M. + Pierce. <i>Lower</i>: PIPING PLOVER. Piping plover brooding young, + Martha’s Vineyard, Mass.; presented by Mr. Howard H. Cleaves and by + courtesy of the National Geographical Society.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate44" style="max-width: 39.25em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate44.jpg" alt="Snowy plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 44. SNOWY PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Snowy plover on its nest, Los + Angeles County, Calif., May 29, 1914. <i>Lower</i>: Another nest, same locality + and date. Both photographs by the author, referred to on page 248.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate45" style="max-width: 39.8125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate45.jpg" alt="Snowy plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 45. SNOWY PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Downy young Cuban snowy + plover, Pensacola, Fla., June 26, 1927; presented by Mr. Francis M. + Weston. <i>Lower</i>: Downy young snowy plover, southern California; presented + by Mr. Wright M. Pierce.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp43" id="i_plate46" style="max-width: 36.125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate46.jpg" alt="Wilson plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 46. WILSON PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest and eggs of Wilson plover, + Bulls Island, S. C., May 22, 1915; presented by Mr. Alexander Sprunt, + jr. <i>Lower</i>: Nest and eggs of Wilson plover, Chatham County, Ga., April + 26, 1922; presented by Mr. W. J. Erichsen.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp45" id="i_plate47" style="max-width: 38.0625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate47.jpg" alt="Wilson plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 47. WILSON PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest and eggs of Wilson plover, + Bulls Island, S. C., May 22, 1915; photographed by the author and referred + to on page 257. <i>Lower</i>: Nest and eggs of Wilson plover among + pickle weed, Merritt’s Island, Fla., June 20, 1926; presented by Mr. + Donald J. Nicholson.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp48" id="i_plate48" style="max-width: 40.625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate48.jpg" alt="Wilson plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 48. WILSON PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Young Wilson plover, just + hatched, Raccoon Key, S. C, June 7, 1927; presented by Mr. Roger + Tory Peterson. <i>Lower</i>: Adult female Wilson plover, about to settle on + her nest, near Bulls Bay, S. C; presented by Mr. Howard H. Cleaves.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp48" id="i_plate49" style="max-width: 40.125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate49.jpg" alt="Mountain plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 49. MOUNTAIN PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Mountain plover at its + nest. <i>Lower</i>: Nest and eggs of mountain plover. Both photographs + taken in Colorado by or for Mr. William C. Bradbury, presented by + the Colorado Museum of Natural History and referred to on page 264.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate50" style="max-width: 39.375em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate50.jpg" alt="Mountain plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 50. MOUNTAIN PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Young mountain plover, + a day or two old, June 4, 1911. <i>Lower</i>: Another, perhaps 10 days old, + June 11, 1911. Both photographs taken by Mr. Edward R. Warren in + Weld County, Colo., and presented by him.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate51" style="max-width: 38.875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate51.jpg" alt="Mountain plover"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 51. MOUNTAIN PLOVER. <i>Upper</i>: Adult mountain plover + approaching its nest; presented by the Colorado Museum of Natural + History, photographed by Mr. W. C. Bradbury, and referred to on page + 264. <i>Lower</i>: Mountain plover attending its young, Weld County, Colo., + June 4, 1911; presented by Mr. Edward R. Warren.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate52" style="max-width: 38.4375em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate52.jpg" alt="Surf bird"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 52. SURF BIRD. <i>Upper</i>: Surf bird on its nest. <i>Lower</i>: Surf + bird inspecting its eggs. Both photographs taken by Mr. Joseph Dixon + in the Mount McKinley District, Alaska, May 29, 1926, presented by + him and referred to on page 271.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate53" style="max-width: 38.6875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate53.jpg" alt="Surf bird"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 53. SURF BIRD. <i>Upper</i>: Male surf bird beside its nest. <i>Lower</i>: + Nest and eggs of surf bird. Both photographs taken by Mr. Joseph + Dixon in the Mount McKinley District, Alaska, May 29, 1926, presented + by him and referred to on page 271.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp44" id="i_plate54" style="max-width: 36.875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate54.jpg" alt="Turnstone"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 54. TURNSTONE. <i>Upper</i>: Turnstone on its nest. <i>Lower</i>: Nest + and eggs of the same bird. Both photographs taken by Mr. Ralph + Chislett, on a Baltic isle, off Öland, June 19, 1924, presented by him + and referred to on page 283.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp100" id="i_plate55" style="max-width: 62.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate55.jpg" alt="Turnstone"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 55. TURNSTONE. <i>Left</i>: Male turnstone on its nest under + cover. <i>Right</i>: Female turnstone. Both photographs taken by Mr. Ralph + Chislett on a Baltic isle, off Öland, June 19, 1924, presented by him and + referred to on page 283.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp47" id="i_plate56" style="max-width: 39.1875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate56.jpg" alt="Turnstone"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 56. TURNSTONE. <i>Upper</i>: Turnstone at its nest, Spitsbergen, + 1921; presented by Mr. Seton P. Gordon and referred to on page 282. + <i>Lower</i>: RUDDY TURNSTONE. Downy young ruddy turnstone, Yukon + Delta, Alaska, June 19, 1914; photographed by Mr. F. Seymour Hersey + for the author.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp100" id="i_plate57" style="max-width: 62.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate57.jpg" alt="Black Turnstone"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 57. BLACK TURNSTONE. Flock of black turnstones, presented + by Mr. Donald R. Dickey.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp46" id="i_plate58" style="max-width: 39.125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate58.jpg" alt="American oyster catcher"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 58. AMERICAN OYSTER CATCHER. Two nests of American + oyster catcher, Bulls Island, S. C., May 22, 1915; photographed by the + author and referred to on page 310.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp44" id="i_plate59" style="max-width: 36.6875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate59.jpg" alt="American oyster catcher"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 59. AMERICAN OYSTER CATCHER. <i>Upper</i>: Immature + American oyster catcher, Cape Romain, S. C., June 8, 1927; presented + by Mr. Roger Tory Peterson. <i>Lower</i>: Adult American oyster catcher, + Bulls Bay, S. C., May, 1904; presented by Mr. Herbert K. Job.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp43" id="i_plate60" style="max-width: 36.625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate60.jpg" alt="Frazer oyster catcher"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 60. FRAZAR OYSTER CATCHER. Two views of Frazar oyster + catcher, Lower California, 1927; presented by Mr. Wright M. Pierce.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp50" id="i_plate61" style="max-width: 53.625em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate61.jpg" alt="Frazer oyster catcher"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 61. FRAZAR OYSTER CATCHER. Two views of young Frazar + oyster catchers, Lower California, 1926; presented by Mr. Wright M. + Pierce.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp100" id="i_plate62" style="max-width: 62.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate62.jpg" alt="Black oyster catcher"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 62. BLACK OYSTER CATCHER. Black oyster catchers on a + reef, coast of Washington, June 22, 1910; presented by Mr. W. Leon + Dawson.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp100" id="i_plate63" style="max-width: 62.5em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate63.jpg" alt="Black oyster catcher"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 63. BLACK OYSTER CATCHER. Nesting site and nest of + black oyster catcher, Destruction Island, Wash.; presented by Mr. W. + Leon Dawson.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp49" id="i_plate64" style="max-width: 41.125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate64.jpg" alt="Black oyster catcher"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 64. BLACK OYSTER CATCHER. <i>Upper</i>: Nest and eggs of + black oyster catcher, Graham Island, British Columbia, May 26, 1927; + presented by Mr. S. J. Darcus. <i>Lower</i>: Nest, eggs and young, just + hatched, of black oyster catcher, Destruction Island, Wash., July 16, + 1906; presented by Mr. W. Leon Dawson.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp50" id="i_plate65" style="max-width: 42.1875em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate65.jpg" alt="Mexican jacana"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 65. MEXICAN JACANA. Two views of Paradise Lake, near + Tampico, Mexico, nesting site of Mexican jacana; presented by Mr. + Thomas S. Gillin and referred to on page 324.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="chapter"> +<figure class="figcenter illowp48" id="i_plate66" style="max-width: 40.3125em;"> + <img class="w100" src="images/i_plate66.jpg" alt="Mexican jacana"> + <figcaption> + <p>PLATE 66. MEXICAN JACANA. <i>Upper</i>: Nest and eggs of Mexican + jacana. <i>Lower</i>: Mexican jacana at home. Both photographs taken by + Mr. Thomas S. Gillin, Paradise Lake, near Tampico, Mexico; presented + by him and referred to on page 325.</p> + </figcaption> +</figure> +</div> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + + +<div class="chapter"> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_407">[Pg 407]</span></p> +<h2 style="display: none; visibility: hidden;">INDEX</h2> +<p class="h2head"> +<span class="ls">INDEX</span> +</p> +</div> + +<ul class="index"> + <li class="ifrst">Actitis macularia, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Aiken and Warren, on mountain plover, <a href="#Page_266">266</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Alexander, W. B.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on Pacific golden plover, <a href="#Page_200">200</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Polynesian tattler, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Allen, Francis H.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_162">162</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_287">287</a></li> + + <li class="indx">altifrons, Pluvialis apricaria, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + + <li class="indx">American golden plover, <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li> + + <li class="indx">American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_309">309</a></li> + + <li class="indx">americanus, Numenius, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Aphriza virgata, <a href="#Page_269">269</a></li> + + <li class="indx">apricaria altifrons, Pluvialis, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Arenaria interpres, <a href="#Page_278">278</a></li> + <li class="isub1">melanocephala, <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + + <li class="indx">arquata arquata, Numenius, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Numenius arquata, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Audubon, J. J.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_187">187</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_313">313</a>, <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_131">131</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on long-billed curlew, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">bachmani, Haematopus, <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bailey, Alfred M., on Mongolian plover, <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bailey, Florence Merriam—</li> + <li class="isub1">on snowy plover, <a href="#Page_250">250</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on surf bird, <a href="#Page_275">275</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on western willet, <a href="#Page_39">39</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bailey, H. H., on American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_310">310</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bancroft, Griffing, on Frazar oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>, <a href="#Page_319">319</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Barrett, Charles—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_166">166</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Pacific golden plover, <a href="#Page_200">200</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_292">292</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Barrows, W. B., on upland plover, <a href="#Page_58">58</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bartramia longicauda, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bartsch, Paul—</li> + <li class="isub1">on bristle-thighed curlew, <a href="#Page_142">142</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_287">287</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bates, J. M.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_205">205</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on upland plover, <a href="#Page_61">61</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Baynard, Oscar E., on Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_258">258</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Beaupre, Edwin—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_184">184</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_115">115</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on piping plover, <a href="#Page_244">244</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Benners, G. B., on upland plover, <a href="#Page_57">57</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bent, A. C., on piping plover, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bergtold, W. H., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Berteau, F. C., on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="#Page_133">133</a></li> + + <li class="indx">bird, surf, <a href="#Page_269">269</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bishop, L. B., on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + + <li class="indx">black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_154">154</a></li> + + <li class="indx">black oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + + <li class="indx">black turnstone, <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + + <li class="indx">borealis, Numenius, <a href="#Page_125">125</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bradbury, W. C., on mountain plover, <a href="#Page_263">263</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Brandt, Herbert W.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black turnstone, <a href="#Page_299">299</a>, <a href="#Page_300">300</a>, <a href="#Page_303">303</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on bristle-thighed curlew, <a href="#Page_141">141</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Pacific golden plover, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>, <a href="#Page_283">283</a>, <a href="#Page_290">290</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bretherton, B. J., on wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_45">45</a></li> + + <li class="indx">brevipes, Heteroscelus, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Brewster, William—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_182">182</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on western willet, <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + + <li class="indx">bristle-thighed curlew, <a href="#Page_140">140</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Brock, S. E., on lapwing, <a href="#Page_145">145</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Brooks, W. Sprague, on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_180">180</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Brown, D. E., on wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Brown, W. J., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_203">203</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Brown, W. W., jr., on Frazar oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_318">318</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bryant, Harold C., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_205">205</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Bryant, Walter E., on Frazar oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_319">319</a></li> + + <li class="indx">buff-breasted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Burroughs, M. H., on American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_311">311</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Cahoon, John C.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_187">187</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_165">165</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Carroll, W. J., on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="#Page_133">133</a></li> + + <li class="indx">catcher, American oyster, <a href="#Page_309">309</a></li> + <li class="isub1">black oyster, <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + <li class="isub1">European oyster, <a href="#Page_305">305</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Frazar oyster, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + + <li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_408">[Pg 408]</span>Catoptrophorus semipalmatus inornatus, <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Catoptrophorus semipalmatus semipalmatus, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Chambers, W. Lee, on snowy plover, <a href="#Page_247">247</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Chapman, Frank M.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on western solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_14">14</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_259">259</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Charadrius dubius curonicus, <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + <li class="isub1">hiaticula, <a href="#Page_229">229</a></li> + <li class="isub1">melodus, <a href="#Page_236">236</a></li> + <li class="isub1">mongolus mongolus, <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + <li class="isub1">nivosus nivosus, <a href="#Page_246">246</a></li> + <li class="isub1">nivosus tenuirostris, <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li> + <li class="isub1">semipalmatus, <a href="#Page_217">217</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Chislett, Ralph, on turnstone, <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + + <li class="indx">cinnamomea, Tringa solitaria, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Clark, Austin H.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_184">184</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black turnstone, <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Cleaves, H. H., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_89">89</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Conover, H. B.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black turnstone, <a href="#Page_300">300</a>, <a href="#Page_301">301</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on bristle-thighed curlew, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>, <a href="#Page_143">143</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_280">280</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Cooke, Wells W.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_178">178</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on buff-breasted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_92">92</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Coues, Elliott—</li> + <li class="isub1">on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_129">129</a>, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>, <a href="#Page_133">133</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on mountain plover, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on upland plover, <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Cuban snowy plover, <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li> + + <li class="indx">curlew, bristle-thighed, <a href="#Page_140">140</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Eskimo, <a href="#Page_125">125</a></li> + <li class="isub1">European, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Hudsonian, <a href="#Page_113">113</a></li> + <li class="isub1">long-billed, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></li> + + <li class="indx">curonicus, Charadrius dubius, <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Dall, W. H., on black oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>, <a href="#Page_323">323</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Davies, S. A., on wood sandpiper, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Dawson, W. Leon—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>, <a href="#Page_322">322</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Frazar oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_317">317</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_119">119</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_45">45</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Dickey, Donald R., on bristle-thighed curlew, <a href="#Page_142">142</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Dill and Bryan, on bristle-thighed curlew, <a href="#Page_142">142</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Dixon, Joseph—</li> + <li class="isub1">on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_219">219</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on surf bird, <a href="#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a></li> + + <li class="indx">dominica dominica, Pluvialis, <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li> + <li class="isub1">fulva, Pluvialis, <a href="#Page_193">193</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Pluvialis dominica, <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Doolittle, E. A., on buff-breasted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_75">75</a></li> + + <li class="indx">dotterel, <a href="#Page_150">150</a></li> + + <li class="indx">dubius curonicus, Charadrius, <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Dwight, Jonathan, on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">eastern willet, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Ekblaw, W. Elmer—</li> + <li class="isub1">on ringed plover, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_280">280</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Elliot, D. G., on long-billed curlew, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Erichsen, W. J., on American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_311">311</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_125">125</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Eudromias morinellus, <a href="#Page_150">150</a></li> + + <li class="indx">European curlew, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + + <li class="indx">European golden plover, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + + <li class="indx">European oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_305">305</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Farley, John A., on piping plover, <a href="#Page_243">243</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Farren, William—</li> + <li class="isub1">on European curlew, <a href="#Page_110">110</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on European oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_306">306</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on ringed plover, <a href="#Page_230">230</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Feilden, H. W., on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_185">185</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Ferry, John F., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Fisher, A. K., on snowy plover, <a href="#Page_249">249</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Forbush, E. H.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_176">176</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_161">161</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_127">127</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_202">202</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on piping plover, <a href="#Page_240">240</a>, <a href="#Page_241">241</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_5">5</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on upland plover, <a href="#Page_64">64</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Ford, Edward R.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on piping plover, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on upland plover, <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Frazar oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + + <li class="indx">frazari, Haematopus palliatus, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + + <li class="indx">fulva, Pluvialis dominica, <a href="#Page_193">193</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Gabrielson, Ira N., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>, <a href="#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="#Page_207">207</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Gibson, Ernest, on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_127">127</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Gillin, Thomas S., on Mexican jacana, <a href="#Page_324">324</a>, <a href="#Page_325">325</a>, <a href="#Page_326">326</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Giraud, Jacob P., on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_5">5</a></li> + + <li class="indx">glareola, Rhyacophilus, <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + + <li class="indx">golden plover, American, <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li> + <li class="isub1">European, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Pacific, <a href="#Page_193">193</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Gordon, Seton—</li> + <li class="isub1">on dotterel, <a href="#Page_152">152</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on European curlew, <a href="#Page_110">110</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on European golden plover, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Goss, N. S., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li> + + <li class="indx">green sandpiper, <a href="#Page_16">16</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Grinnell, Bryant, and Storer—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_163">163</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black turnstone, <a href="#Page_301">301</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on mountain plover, <a href="#Page_266">266</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on snowy plover, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>, <a href="#Page_250">250</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Grinnell, George B., on eastern willet, <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Grinnell, Joseph—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_117">117</a></li> + <li class="isub1"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_409">[Pg 409]</span>on surf bird, <a href="#Page_269">269</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on western solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li> + + <li class="indx">gymnostoma, Jacana spinosa, <a href="#Page_324">324</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Hadeler, E. W., on piping plover, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Haematopus bachmani, <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + <li class="isub1">ostralegus, <a href="#Page_305">305</a></li> + <li class="isub1">palliatus frazari, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + <li class="isub2">palliatus, <a href="#Page_309">309</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Hancock, John, on wood sandpiper, <a href="#Page_23">23</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Hanna, G. Dallas, on Polynesian tattler, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Hartert, Ernst, on green sandpiper, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Haviland, Maud D., on Pacific golden plover, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Heath, Harold, on black oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Henderson, A. D., on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_4">4</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Henderson, Junius, on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_222">222</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Henshaw, Henry W.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on Pacific golden plover, <a href="#Page_194">194</a>, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_292">292</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Heteroscelus brevipes, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li> + <li class="isub1">incanus, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Hewitson, W. C., on turnstone, <a href="#Page_282">282</a></li> + + <li class="indx">hiaticula, Charadrius, <a href="#Page_229">229</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Hoare, A. R., on turnstone, <a href="#Page_281">281</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Hoskin, H. G., on mountain plover, <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Howell, A. B.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_322">322</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black turnstone, <a href="#Page_304">304</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Howell, Arthur H.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on piping plover, <a href="#Page_240">240</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_260">260</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Hoxie, Walter J., on American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_311">311</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Hudson, W. H.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_188">188</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on buff-breasted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on upland plover, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_113">113</a></li> + + <li class="indx">hudsonicus, Numenius, <a href="#Page_113">113</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Hunter, Katharine U., on upland plover, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Huxley and Montague, on European oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_306">306</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">incanus, Heteroscelus, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li> + + <li class="indx">inornatus, Catoptrophorus semipalmatus, <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + + <li class="indx">interpres, Arenaria, <a href="#Page_278">278</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Iseley, Dwight, on killdeer, <a href="#Page_203">203</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">jacana, Mexican, <a href="#Page_324">324</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Jacana spinosa gymnostoma, <a href="#Page_324">324</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Janvrin, E. R. P.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_163">163</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_119">119</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Jessup, J. M., on wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Jewel, L. L.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_118">118</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Jewell, H. W., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Job, Herbert K.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_115">115</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Jones, Lynds, on upland plover, <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Jourdain, F. C. R.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on dotterel, <a href="#Page_150">150</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on European curlew, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on European golden plover, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on European oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_305">305</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on green sandpiper, <a href="#Page_16">16</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on lapwing, <a href="#Page_144">144</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on little ringed plover, <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Mongolian plover, <a href="#Page_253">253</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_256">256</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on ringed plover, <a href="#Page_229">229</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on ruff, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_4">4</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>, <a href="#Page_288">288</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on whimbrel, <a href="#Page_136">136</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on wood sandpiper, <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Jouy, P. L., on Mexican jacana, <a href="#Page_326">326</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Kalmbach, E. R., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_210">210</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Kelso, J. E. H., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Killdeer, <a href="#Page_202">202</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Knight, Ora W., on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_4">4</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">lapwing, <a href="#Page_144">144</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Lawrence, Alexander G., on piping plover, <a href="#Page_239">239</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Lewis, H. F.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on eastern willet, <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Lien, Carl—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_322">322</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black turnstone, <a href="#Page_304">304</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on surf bird, <a href="#Page_276">276</a></li> + + <li class="indx">little ringed plover, <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + + <li class="indx">long-billed curlew, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></li> + + <li class="indx">longicauda, Bartramia, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Lyon, Wm. I., on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_115">115</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">MacFarlane, Roderick—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_179">179</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_158">158</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on buff-breasted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_72">72</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_117">117</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Mackay, George H.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_185">185</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on buff-breasted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_74">74</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_121">121</a></li> + + <li class="indx">MacMillan, Donald B., on turnstone, <a href="#Page_289">289</a></li> + + <li class="indx">macularia, Actitis, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Manniche, A. L. V., on turnstone, <a href="#Page_284">284</a></li> + + <li class="indx">May, John B., on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_2">2</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Maynard, C. J.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on eastern willet, <a href="#Page_30">30</a></li> + + <li class="indx">McAtee, W. L.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_209">209</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on upland plover, <a href="#Page_61">61</a></li> + + <li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_410">[Pg 410]</span>Mearns, Edgar A., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li> + + <li class="indx">melodus, Charadrius, <a href="#Page_236">236</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Merrill, J. C., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_90">90</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Mexican jacana, <a href="#Page_324">324</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Meyer, G. Ralph, on Pacific golden plover, <a href="#Page_200">200</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Mongolian plover, <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + + <li class="indx">mongolus, Charadrius mongolus, <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + <li class="isub1">mongolus, Charadrius, <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + + <li class="indx">montanus, Podasocys, <a href="#Page_263">263</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Moore, N. B., on turnstone, <a href="#Page_289">289</a></li> + + <li class="indx">morinellus, Eudromias, <a href="#Page_150">150</a></li> + + <li class="indx">mountain plover, <a href="#Page_263">263</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Mousley, Henry, on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Munn, P. W., on little ringed plover, <a href="#Page_235">235</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Murdoch, John—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_179">179</a>, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on buff-breasted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Murie, O. J.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on surf bird, <a href="#Page_270">270</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Murphy, Robert Cushman, on Frazar oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Naumann, J. F., on little ringed plover, <a href="#Page_234">234</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Nelson, E. W.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black turnstone, <a href="#Page_300">300</a>, <a href="#Page_303">303</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on bristle-thighed curlew, <a href="#Page_140">140</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Newton, Alfred, on green sandpiper, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Nichols, John T.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_163">163</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on eastern willet, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_119">119</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Pacific golden plover, <a href="#Page_199">199</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on piping plover, <a href="#Page_243">243</a>,</li> + <li class="isub1">on ringed plover, <a href="#Page_232">232</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_287">287</a>, <a href="#Page_289">289</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on western willet, <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_261">261</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Nicholson, Donald J., on Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_259">259</a></li> + + <li class="indx">nivosus tenuirostris, Charadrius, <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Noble, Frank T., on turnstone, <a href="#Page_286">286</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Numenius americanus, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></li> + <li class="isub1">arquata arquata, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + <li class="isub1">borealis, <a href="#Page_125">125</a></li> + <li class="isub1">hudsonicus, <a href="#Page_113">113</a></li> + <li class="isub1">phaeopus phaeopus, <a href="#Page_136">136</a></li> + <li class="isub1">tahitiensis, <a href="#Page_140">140</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Nuttall, Thomas, on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">ocrophus, Tringa, <a href="#Page_16">16</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Osgood, Wilfred H.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on western solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_14">14</a></li> + + <li class="indx">ostralegus, Haematopus, <a href="#Page_305">305</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Oxyechus vociferus, <a href="#Page_202">202</a></li> + + <li class="indx">oyster catcher, American, <a href="#Page_309">309</a></li> + <li class="isub1">black, <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + <li class="isub1">European, <a href="#Page_305">305</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Frazar, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Pacific golden plover, <a href="#Page_193">193</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Paget-Wilkes, A. H., on turnstone, <a href="#Page_282">282</a>, <a href="#Page_284">284</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Pagolla wilsonia wilsonia, <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + + <li class="indx">palliatus frazari, Haematopus, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Haematopus palliatus, <a href="#Page_309">309</a></li> + <li class="isub1">palliatus, Haematopus, <a href="#Page_309">309</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Palmer, William—</li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_291">291</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_46">46</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Patten, C. J., on green sandpiper, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Pearse, Theed, on killdeer, <a href="#Page_204">204</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Pearson, Henry J.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_158">158</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_282">282</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on wood sandpiper, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Pennock, C. J., on Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_261">261</a></li> + + <li class="indx">phaeopus, Numenius phaeopus, <a href="#Page_136">136</a></li> + <li class="isub1">phaeopus, Numenius, <a href="#Page_136">136</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Philipp and Bowdish, on piping plover, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Philipp, P. B.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on eastern willet, <a href="#Page_34">34</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Philomachus pugnax, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Pickwell, Gayle, on piping plover, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>, <a href="#Page_243">243</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Pierce, Fred J., on upland plover, <a href="#Page_57">57</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Piping plover, <a href="#Page_236">236</a></li> + + <li class="indx">plover, American golden, <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li> + <li class="isub1">black-bellied, <a href="#Page_154">154</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Cuban snowy, <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li> + <li class="isub1">European golden, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + <li class="isub1">little ringed, <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Mongolian, <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + <li class="isub1">mountain, <a href="#Page_263">263</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Pacific golden, <a href="#Page_193">193</a></li> + <li class="isub1">piping, <a href="#Page_236">236</a></li> + <li class="isub1">ringed, <a href="#Page_229">229</a></li> + <li class="isub1">semipalmated, <a href="#Page_217">217</a></li> + <li class="isub1">snowy, <a href="#Page_246">246</a></li> + <li class="isub1">upland, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Wilson, <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Pluvialis apricaria altifrons, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + <li class="isub1">dominica dominica, <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li> + <li class="isub2">fulva, <a href="#Page_193">193</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Podasocys montanus, <a href="#Page_263">263</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Polynesian tattler, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Praeger, W. V., on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_222">222</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Preble, Edward A., on turnstone, <a href="#Page_290">290</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Preble and McAtee, on wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_45">45</a></li> + + <li class="indx">pugnax, Philomachus, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Raine, Walter, on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + + <li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_411">[Pg 411]</span>Rathbun, S. F.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>, <a href="#Page_160">160</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black turnstone, <a href="#Page_302">302</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_204">204</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_279">279</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Reid, Savile G.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_185">185</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Rhyacophilus glareola, <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Rich, Walter H.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_166">166</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Ridgway, Robert, on western solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_14">14</a></li> + + <li class="indx">ringed plover, <a href="#Page_229">229</a></li> + + <li class="indx">ringed plover, little, <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Robbins, C. A., on piping plover, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>, <a href="#Page_242">242</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Roberts, Thomas S.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on long-billed curlew, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on upland plover, <a href="#Page_56">56</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Rockwell, Robert B., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_207">207</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Roosevelt, Robert B., on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Rowan, William—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on buff-breasted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on upland plover, <a href="#Page_58">58</a></li> + + <li class="indx">ruff, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Samuels, E. A., on eastern willet, <a href="#Page_30">30</a></li> + + <li class="indx">sandpiper, buff-breasted, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></li> + <li class="isub1">green, <a href="#Page_16">16</a></li> + <li class="isub1">solitary, <a href="#Page_1">1</a></li> + <li class="isub1">spotted, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li> + <li class="isub1">western solitary, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li> + <li class="isub1">wood, <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Sandys, Edwin, on upland plover, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Saunders, Aretas A.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>, <a href="#Page_208">208</a>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on piping plover, <a href="#Page_242">242</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Scott, W. E. D., on piping plover, <a href="#Page_244">244</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Seebohm, Henry—</li> + <li class="isub1">on Pacific golden plover, <a href="#Page_195">195</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on wood sandpiper, <a href="#Page_23">23</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Selous, Edmund—</li> + <li class="isub1">on European oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_306">306</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on ruff, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a></li> + + <li class="indx">semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_217">217</a></li> + + <li class="indx">semipalmatus, Catoptrophorus semipalmatus, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Charadrius, <a href="#Page_217">217</a></li> + <li class="isub1">inornatus, Catoptrophorus, <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + <li class="isub1">semipalmatus, Catoptrophorus, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Sennett, George. B., on American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_311">311</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Seton, E. T. (Thompson), on western willet, <a href="#Page_37">37</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Shelley, Lewis O., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Sherman, Althea R., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_207">207</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Shick, Charles S., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Silloway, P. M., on long-billed curlew, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Skinner, M. P., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>, <a href="#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="#Page_208">208</a>, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>, + <a href="#Page_213">213</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Smith, Wm. G., on mountain plover, <a href="#Page_264">264</a>, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a></li> + + <li class="indx">snowy plover, <a href="#Page_246">246</a></li> + + <li class="indx">snowy plover, Cuban, <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Snyder, L. L., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_89">89</a></li> + + <li class="indx">solitaria cinnamomea, Tringa, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li> + <li class="isub1">solitaria, Tringa, <a href="#Page_1">1</a></li> + <li class="isub1">Tringa solitaria, <a href="#Page_1">1</a></li> + + <li class="indx">solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_1">1</a></li> + <li class="isub1">western, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li> + + <li class="indx">spinosa gymnostoma, Jacana, <a href="#Page_324">324</a></li> + + <li class="indx">spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Squatarola squatarola, <a href="#Page_154">154</a></li> + + <li class="indx">squatarola, Squatarola, <a href="#Page_154">154</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Stanford, John K., on ringed plover, <a href="#Page_230">230</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Stejneger, Leonhard—</li> + <li class="isub1">on Mongolian plover, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_256">256</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>, <a href="#Page_287">287</a>, <a href="#Page_291">291</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Stockard, Charles R., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_205">205</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Street, J. Fletcher, on solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_2">2</a></li> + + <li class="indx">subruficollis, Tryngites, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></li> + + <li class="indx">surf bird, <a href="#Page_269">269</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Sutton, G. M., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Swarth, H. S.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on surf bird, <a href="#Page_270">270</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Swenk, Myron H., on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, <a href="#Page_129">129</a>, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>, + <a href="#Page_133">133</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">tahitiensis, Numenius, <a href="#Page_140">140</a></li> + + <li class="indx">tattler, Polynesian, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li> + <li class="isub1">wandering, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Taverner, P. A.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on long-billed curlew, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_89">89</a></li> + + <li class="indx">tenuirostris, Charadrius nivosus, <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Terrill, L. McI., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_82">82</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Thayer, Gerald H., on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_222">222</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Thurston, Henry, on Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_258">258</a>, <a href="#Page_259">259</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Torrey, Bradford—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black turnstone, <a href="#Page_301">301</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on western willet, <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Townsend, Charles W.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_162">162</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_126">126</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_119">119</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_202">202</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on semipalmated plover, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Treganza, A. O., on long-billed curlew, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Tringa ocrophus, <a href="#Page_16">16</a></li> + <li class="isub1">solitaria cinnamomea, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li> + <li class="isub1">solitaria, <a href="#Page_1">1</a></li> + + <li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_412">[Pg 412]</span>Tryngites subruficollis, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Turner, Lucien M.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_322">322</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black turnstone, <a href="#Page_298">298</a>, <a href="#Page_303">303</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Eskimo curlew, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>, <a href="#Page_131">131</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Pacific golden plover, <a href="#Page_198">198</a></li> + + <li class="indx">turnstone, <a href="#Page_278">278</a></li> + + <li class="indx">turnstone, black, <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Tyler, John G.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_120">120</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_206">206</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on mountain plover, <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Tyler, Winsor M.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on piping plover, <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">upland plover, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">Van Denburgh, J., on western willet, <a href="#Page_37">37</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Vanellus vanellus, <a href="#Page_144">144</a></li> + + <li class="indx">vanellus, Vanellus, <a href="#Page_144">144</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Van Rossem, A. J., on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a></li> + + <li class="indx">virgata, Aphriza, <a href="#Page_269">269</a></li> + + <li class="indx">vociferus, Oxyechus, <a href="#Page_202">202</a></li> + + + <li class="ifrst">wandering tattler, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Warburton, Stanton, jr., on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_117">117</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Warren, Edward B., on mountain plover, <a href="#Page_265">265</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Wayne, Arthur T.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_155">155</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on eastern willet, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Hudsonian curlew, <a href="#Page_115">115</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="#Page_210">210</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on long-billed curlew, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_287">287</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_263">263</a></li> + + <li class="indx">western solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></li> + + <li class="indx">western willet, <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Weston, Francis M.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on black-bellied plover, <a href="#Page_163">163</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Cuban snowy plover, <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_261">261</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Wetmore, Alexander—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American golden plover, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_188">188</a>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on bristle-thighed curlew, <a href="#Page_142">142</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on buff-breasted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on turnstone, <a href="#Page_288">288</a>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on upland plover, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on western solitary sandpiper, <a href="#Page_15">15</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Wheelwright, Horace W., on green sandpiper, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_18">18</a></li> + + <li class="indx">whimbrel, <a href="#Page_136">136</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Whittle, C. L.—</li> + <li class="isub1">on lapwing, <a href="#Page_149">149</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Wickersham, C. W., on long-billed curlew, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Willet, eastern, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + <li class="isub1">western, <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Willett, George, on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_93">93</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Williams, R. W., on killdeer, <a href="#Page_213">213</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Wilson, Alexander—</li> + <li class="isub1">on American oyster catcher, <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on killdeer, <a href="#Page_202">202</a></li> + <li class="isub1">on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Wilson plover, <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + + <li class="indx">wilsonia, Pagolla wilsonia, <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + <li class="isub1">wilsonia, Pagolla, <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Witherby, H. F., on little ringed plover, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Wood, Allen H., on piping plover, <a href="#Page_237">237</a></li> + + <li class="indx">wood sandpiper, <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + + <li class="indx">Wright and Harper, on spotted sandpiper, <a href="#Page_79">79</a></li> +</ul> + +<div style='text-align:center'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 77498 ***</div> +</body> +</html> diff --git a/77498-h/images/cover.jpg b/77498-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a3129c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/cover.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate01.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate01.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1d67a1f --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate01.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate02.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate02.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9cc2c8c --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate02.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate03.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate03.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5b7eb92 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate03.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate04.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate04.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..01a55b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate04.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate05.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate05.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..90280f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate05.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate06.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate06.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a17b987 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate06.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate07.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate07.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2aa051a --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate07.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate08.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate08.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..41109cb --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate08.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate09.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate09.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c89a45e --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate09.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate10.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate10.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0d9b53b --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate10.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate11.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate11.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4b05b5b --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate11.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate12.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate12.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b9da78d --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate12.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate13.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate13.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3f7cc84 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate13.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate14.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate14.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3c074fa --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate14.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate15.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate15.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8d87fc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate15.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate16.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate16.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9d31c9b --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate16.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate17.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate17.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..bb965e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate17.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate18.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate18.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ad6c80e --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate18.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate19.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate19.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9b9c693 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate19.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate20.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate20.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b622d39 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate20.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate21.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate21.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..271ab2e --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate21.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate22.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate22.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d68943b --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate22.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate23.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate23.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b0a173a --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate23.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate24.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate24.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ae38cf1 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate24.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate25.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate25.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9dc1de9 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate25.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate26.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate26.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9b5c0a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate26.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate27.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate27.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..df4ba39 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate27.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate28.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate28.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..730d92e --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate28.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate29.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate29.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a4c2dc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate29.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate30.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate30.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..174589a --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate30.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate31.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate31.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f5e6f3e --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate31.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate32.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate32.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..19c604e --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate32.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate33.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate33.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a6e2a61 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate33.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate34.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate34.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..1128b7d --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate34.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate35.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate35.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..adf2649 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate35.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate36.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate36.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..73fe133 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate36.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate37.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate37.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f361808 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate37.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate38.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate38.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4fee002 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate38.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate39.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate39.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..839c67a --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate39.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate40.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate40.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e45c8a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate40.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate41.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate41.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0f323a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate41.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate42.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate42.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2e04592 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate42.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate43.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate43.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2a85088 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate43.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate44.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate44.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a5a3340 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate44.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate45.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate45.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..173fd54 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate45.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate46.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate46.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9ef18a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate46.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate47.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate47.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d5a5e81 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate47.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate48.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate48.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a51dd0d --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate48.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate49.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate49.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..f8672ff --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate49.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate50.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate50.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..639fea0 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate50.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate51.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate51.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9238c77 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate51.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate52.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate52.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..2c71c9e --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate52.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate53.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate53.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..335e075 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate53.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate54.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate54.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7a72aef --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate54.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate55.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate55.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..fb8b0fa --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate55.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate56.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate56.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4308d13 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate56.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate57.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate57.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c8d19bb --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate57.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate58.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate58.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..886ba51 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate58.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate59.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate59.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..846b990 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate59.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate60.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate60.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c824503 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate60.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate61.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate61.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..34d15ac --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate61.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate62.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate62.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a393035 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate62.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate63.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate63.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..e0b6817 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate63.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate64.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate64.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..445b01d --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate64.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate65.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate65.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9cad762 --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate65.jpg diff --git a/77498-h/images/i_plate66.jpg b/77498-h/images/i_plate66.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a5fc89c --- /dev/null +++ b/77498-h/images/i_plate66.jpg |
