1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>ARCHEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN NEW MEXICO,
COLORADO, AND UTAH | Project Gutenberg</title>
<link rel="icon" href="images/cover.jpg" type="image/x-cover">
<style>
body {
margin-left: 10%;
margin-right: 10%;
}
h1, h2, h3, h4 {
text-align: center;
clear: both;
}
h2, h3 {
font-size: medium;
margin-top: 3%;
margin-bottom: 1%;
}
p {
margin-top: .5em;
margin-bottom: .5em;
text-align: justify;
text-indent: 1em;
}
/* === Title page === */
div.titlepage {
text-align: center;
margin-top: 10%;
font-weight: bold;
page-break-before: always;
}
div.titlepage p {
text-align: center;
text-indent: 0;
font-weight: bold;
line-height: 1.5;
margin-top: 3em;
}
div.chapter {
clear: both;
margin-top: 10%;
page-break-before: always;
}
hr {width: 35%; margin: 1% 32.5%; clear: both;}
hr.chap {width: 65%; margin: 5% 17.5%;}
.x-ebookmaker hr.chap {visibility: hidden;}
@media print {hr.chap {visibility: hidden;}}
/* === Superscript size === */
sup {font-size: 75%;}
/* === Fonts === */
.xsmall {font-size: x-small;}
.small {font-size: small;}
.large {font-size: large;}
.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
.sans {font-weight: bold; font-family: sans-serif;}
/* === Alignment === */
.mt2 {margin-top: 2%;}
.mt5 {margin-top: 5%;}
.mt10 {margin-top: 10%;}
.mb10 {margin-bottom: 10%;}
.clear {clear: both;}
.center {text-align: center;}
.right {text-align: right;}
/* === Page #s === */
.pagenum {
position: absolute;
right: 1%;
color: gray;
font-size: x-small;
text-align: right;
font-style: normal;
font-weight: normal;
font-variant: normal;
padding: 0 0.2em;
}
blockquote {
margin-left: 5%;
margin-right: 10%;
}
/* === Footnotes === */
.footheader {
font-size: x-large;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: underline;
margin-top: 5%;
margin-bottom: 3%;
}
.footnote {
margin: 1% 5% 1% 6%;
font-size: small;
text-align: justify;
}
.footnote .label {
position: absolute;
right: 86%;
text-align: right;
}
.fnanchor {
vertical-align: super;
font-size: x-small;
text-decoration: none;
font-style: normal;
font-weight: normal;
font-variant: normal;
}
.col50 {
display: inline-block;
width: 49.5%;
vertical-align: top;
}
/* === Images === */
img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
figure {
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
max-width: 100%;
text-align: center;
page-break-inside: avoid;
clear: both;
}
figcaption {
font-weight: bold;
text-align: center;
}
.figcenter {
text-align: center;
clear: both;
max-width: 100%;
page-break-inside: avoid;
}
.attr, .x-ebookmaker .attr {
float: right;
font-size: small;
margin-bottom: 0.5%;
}
.illowp20 {width: 20%; max-width: 15em;}
.illowp33 {width: 33%; max-width: 25em;}
.illowp54 {width: 54%; max-width: 40.5em;}
.illowp58 {width: 58%; max-width: 43.5em;}
.illowp60 {width: 60%; max-width: 45em;}
.illowp70 {width: 70%; max-width: 52.5em;}
.illowp73 {width: 73%; max-width: 54.75em;}
.illowp75 {width: 75%; max-width: 56.25em;}
.illowp92 {width: 92%; max-width: 69em;}
.illowp100 {width: 100%; max-width: 75em;}
.w100 {width: 100%;}
/* === Abreviation: no underline, no color === */
abbr {
border: none;
text-decoration: none;
}
/* === Transcriber's notes === */
ul.spaced li {padding-top: 1%;}
.transnote {
background-color: #E6E6FA;
border: 1px solid;
color: black;
font-size: small;
padding: 0.5em;
margin-bottom: 5em;
font-family: sans-serif, serif;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 70751 ***</div>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp75" src="images/cover.jpg" alt="" id="cover">
</figure>
<div class="titlepage">
<div><span class="large">SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS</span><br>
<span class="small">VOLUME 68 NUMBER 1</span></div>
<h1 class="mt10">Archeological Investigations in New<br>
Mexico, Colorado, and Utah</h1>
<div class="smcap small mt2">(With 14 Plates)</div>
<div class="mt10">BY</div>
<div class=" mt2 mb10">J. WALTER FEWKES</div>
<figure class="figcenter illowp33">
<img class="w100" src="images/title.jpg" alt="Smithsonian logo">
</figure>
<div class="smcap small mt2">(Publication 2442)</div>
<div class="small mt10">CITY OF WASHINGTON<br>
PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION<br>
MAY, 1917</div>
</div>
<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
<div class="center mt10 mb10"><b>The Lord Baltimore Press<br>
<span class="xsmall">BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A.</span></b>
</div>
<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop">
<div class="chapter">
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_1">1</span>
<div class="center large"><b>ARCHEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN NEW MEXICO,<br>
COLORADO, AND UTAH</b></div>
</div>
<div class="center mt2"><b><span class="smcap">By</span> J. WALTER FEWKES</b></div>
<div class="center smcap mt2"><b>(With 14 Plates)</b></div>
<h2 class="mt5"><b>INTRODUCTION</b></h2>
<p>During the year 1916 the author spent five months in archeological
investigations in New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah, three of these
months being given to intensive work on the Mesa Verde National Park
in Colorado. An account of the result of the Mesa Verde work will
appear in the Smithsonian Annual Report for 1916, under the title “A
Prehistoric Mesa Verde Pueblo and Its People.” What was accomplished in
June and October, 1916, before and after the work at the Mesa Verde, is
here recorded.</p>
<p>As archeological work in the Southwest progresses, it becomes more
and more evident that we can not solve the many problems it presents
until we know more about the general distribution of ruins, and the
characteristic forms peculiar to different geographical localities.
Most of the results thus far accomplished are admirable, though
limited to a few regions, while many extensive areas have as yet
not been explored by the archeologist and the types of architecture
peculiar to these unexplored areas remain unknown. Here we need a
reconnoissance followed by intensive work to supplement what has
already been done. The following pages contain an account of what might
be called archeological scouting in New Mexico and Utah. While the
matter here presented may not shed much light on general archeology, it
is, nevertheless, a contribution to our knowledge of the prehistoric
human inhabitants of our country. Primarily it treats of aboriginal
architecture.</p>
<p>The author spent two months in searching for undescribed buildings
concerning some of which comparatively nothing was known. During June,
1916, headquarters were made at Gallup, New Mexico: the Utah ruins, new
to science, were visited from the Indian agency at Ouray, Utah.</p>
<p>The plan of operations in these two fields was somewhat different.
The work in New Mexico was an attempt to verify existing legends<span class="pagenum" id="Page_2">2</span> of
the migrations of a Hopi (Walpi) clan that once lived in a ruined
pueblo called Sikyatki, where the cemeteries, exhumed in 1895, yielded
one of the most beautiful and instructive collections of prehistoric
pottery<a id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> ever brought to the U. S. National Museum from the Southwest.</p>
<p>Legends mention by name several habitations of the Sikyatki people
during their migration from the Jemez region, before they built their
Hopi pueblo, but lack of time prevented the author from tracing their
trail throughout the entire distance back to their original home. The
object of the present investigation was to examine one of their halting
places, a ruined pueblo called Tebungki, or Fire House,<a id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> on the
prehistoric trail about 25 miles east of Walpi. Between this ruined
village and the ancestral home there are large and as yet undescribed
ruins, such as those of the Chaco Canyon, which may once have been
inhabited by some of these people.</p>
<p>Our knowledge of the former shifting of ancient clans, derived from
legends, is fragmentary, and one way to gain further information and
revivify forgotten or unrecorded history, is to study the remains of
their material culture. Architecture is a most important survival, and
pottery, which has transmitted ancient symbolism unchanged, is also
valuable. It happens that both these aids characterize the southwestern
culture areas. Other objects, as stone implements, woven and plaited
fabrics, and basketry, are not greatly unlike those made by unrelated
Indians and consequently add little to our knowledge in studies of
cultures, but architecture and ceramics are distinctive and afford data
from which we can gather much information on the history of vanished
races.</p>
<h2>TEBUNGKI (FIRE HOUSE)</h2>
<p>Hopi legends of clans whose ancestors once peopled the Sikyatki ruin,
but are now absorbed in the Walpi population, recount that in their
western migration they built, near a deep canyon, a village which they
named Fire House. These legends were first obtained from the Hopi by A.
M. Stephen and recorded by Victor Mindeleff<a id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> who located Fire House
ruin over 20 years ago. His valuable description and ground plan, the
only account heretofore printed, is graphic and substantially correct.
He calls attention to the characteristic<span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">3</span> or salient points which
distinguish Fire House from ruined buildings in the Hopi reservation,
especially its circular or oval form and the massive, well-constructed
masonry of its walls.</p>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp100" src="images/fig01.jpg" alt="ground plan" id="fig01">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 1.</span>—Fire House.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The exact dimensions of Fire House (<a href="#pl01">pl. 1</a>) can be obtained only by
excavation, but it is approximately 94 by 79 feet in greater and lesser
diameter. Some parts of the outside wall are now 10 feet high, and its
thickness averages 3 feet, but if the stones accumulated about its
base were removed the height would be 4 or 5 feet greater. There are
evidences of an external passage-way through the outer wall indicating
a central court. Within the enclosure there are many indications of
rooms some of which appear to be circular, but the interior is so
filled with fallen walls that an accurate ground plan could not be
drawn without extensive excavation. The stones forming the wall are,
as a rule, cubical blocks, well dressed and accurately fitted, showing
good masonry.</p>
<p>Two of the largest of the wall stones are 5 feet long and 3 feet wide,
with an estimated thickness of 2 feet. As it would take<span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">4</span> several men
to carry one of these stones from the quarry to its place in the wall,
they might be called megaliths.</p>
<p>The fine spring at the base of the cliff below Fire House was evidently
used by the inhabitants for drinking water, and the trail from here to
a gateway in the outer wall is still well marked. As one climbs from
the spring to the top of the plateau the way passes between the cliff
and a flat stone set on edge and pierced with a hole about 5 feet above
the pathway. This stone was evidently a means of defense; behind it the
warriors may have stood peering down upon their enemies through this
orifice. Near it are pictographs of unknown meaning.</p>
<p>The circular form of Fire House (<a href="#fig01">fig. 1</a>) and its well-constructed
surrounding wall are more characteristic of eastern than of western
pueblo masonry. This round type<a id="FNanchor_4" href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> is found from southern Colorado on
the north to the neighborhood of the Zuñi settlements on the south; it
has not been reported from the region on both banks of the Rio Grande.
Roughly speaking, circular ruins correspond, in their distribution,
with a line extending north-south midway between the eastern and
western sections of the pueblo area—a limitation that can hardly be
regarded as fortuitous. Its meaning we may not be able to correctly
interpret, but the fact calls for an explanation. The type is old, the
modern pueblos having abandoned this form. The area where circular
ruins occur corresponds, in a way, to that inhabited in part by the
modern Keres, none of whom, however, now dwell in circular towns.
Provisionally we shall consider the Keresan pueblos as the nearest of
all descendants of those who once inhabited villages of circular or
oval form, a generalization substantiated by the existence of words of
Keres language in many old ceremonies among all the pueblos.</p>
<p>There is a sharp line of demarcation between the zone of circular ruins
and that inhabited by the pueblos along the Rio Grande, but on the
western border these circular buildings extend as far west as the Hopi
country.</p>
<p>In attempting to connect the oval form of Fire House with the
rectangular form of Sikyatki we are met with the difficulty of
architectural dissimilarity. Fire House is circular, Sikyatki is
rectangular. If the descendants of the inhabitants of Fire House later
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">5</span>constructed Sikyatki, why did they make this radical change in the
form of their dwellings? They may have constructed a habitation en
route before they reached Sikyatki, and this village may have had a
form like Fire House. On the Hopi plateau above Sikyatki there are
two conical mounds visible for a long distance as one approaches East
Mesa from the mouth of Keam’s Canyon, which should be considered in
this connection. These mounds, called Kükütcomo, are connected in
Hopi legends with those of Sikyatki at the foot of the mesa on which
they stand, and the buildings they cover are said once to have been
inhabited by the Coyote (Fire?) clan of eastern kinship. They have not
been excavated completely but several rooms have been opened up enough
to show that they are round towers or kivas with rooms annexed to their
bases. They resemble, in fact, circular ruins and may well have been
the home of some of the people who abandoned Fire House. They must be
considered in discussing the reliability of the legend, for they are
the only circular houses yet reported from the Hopi country. The reason
why this form of house was abandoned can not be determined with any
certainty, even though some of the clans from Fire House may have built
the round towers above Sikyatki. The only other round room known to me
in the Hopi country, besides Kükütcomo, is one in a ruin in the Oraibi
Valley mentioned by Victor Mindeleff (<i>op. cit.</i>). The reference
is very meager and on account of its exceptional character should be
verified. Assuming the observation as correct it may be said that this
so-called circular room lies embedded in a mass of rectangular rooms
and not as kivas in the inhabited Hopi pueblos in the plazas free from
houses.</p>
<p>The legends of the Snake people of Walpi who came from the San Juan
near Navaho Mountain, probably Betatakin or Kitsiel, distinctly state
that their ancestors built both round and square or “five-cornered”
houses. The rooms referred to are believed to be kivas, since another
legend declares the earliest snake ceremonies were performed in
circular rooms. After visiting Fire House the author desired greatly to
find other oval ruins between it and the zone of circular ruins, but
his efforts were not successful.</p>
<h2>SEARCH FOR HOPI RUINS EAST OF TEBUNGKI</h2>
<p>After having visited Fire House and verified to his satisfaction that
it was a former home of a Hopi clan, as recounted in legends of that
clan, the author sought still further evidence of an archeological
character in the region east of Fire House, as recorded in migration
stories. The area between Fire House and Jemez is extensive<span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">6</span> and rich
in ruins of all kinds, open air pueblos predominating. It is too great
a task to visit all of these ruins during one summer, and the work
accomplished in a single month seems small, but a beginning was made
in the hope that the cumulative work of many summers will make it
important.</p>
<p>The farther we recede from the Hopi country the more obscure become
their clan trails, and the more difficult it is to identify the
localities mentioned in legends. The inhabitants of some of the pueblos
now in ruins between Jemez and Hopi, may have died out without leaving
any representatives; others, when they left their village, may have
gone to Zuñi or elsewhere. In the country east of Fire House, as
far as Fort Defiance, several ruins were observed, but none of them
seemed to show close archeological likeness to the oval Fire House,
or to corroborate the traditions of the descendants of the clans now
absorbed into the population of Walpi. A large ruin near Ganado was
visited, and an imperfect sketch made of its ground plan. Its walls are
so much worn down by the encroachment of the stream on one side, and
the road on the other, that little could be learned from superficial
examination. Although it is not a circular ruin like Fire House, yet an
extended excavation might reveal some interesting details of ceramic
symbolism<a id="FNanchor_5" href="#Footnote_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> which would be important.</p>
<h2>RUINS IN NASHLINI CANYON</h2>
<p>Two cliff houses of small size were visited in Nashlini Canyon which
appear to be those casually mentioned by Dr. Prudden,<a id="FNanchor_6" href="#Footnote_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> but, so far as
known, they have not been described. This canyon is one of the southern
branches of the Chelly Canyon, and although not very extensive shares
with it many characteristics. A trip can be made into it by automobile
as far as the first cliff house.</p>
<p>The ruin most easily visited (<a href="#fig02">fig. 2</a>) in this canyon is on a
comparatively low shelf in a shallow cave, 40 feet high, a few feet
above the top of the talus. Like many other cliff houses it is divided
into two parts, called the upper and the lower, according to the level
they occupy. The lower is practically buried under rocks fallen from
the walls of the upper house. The front wall of the upper part <span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">7</span>is well
preserved and closely follows the contour of the low ridge on which
it stands. The masonry is fairly good, but the floors of the rooms
are buried under a thick deposit of sheep droppings, solidly packed,
showing that the enclosures have been used secondarily as corrals for
these domesticated animals. The partition walls of the rooms end on the
vertical wall of the precipice, the face of the precipice serving as
their rear wall. It thus happens that there is no recess between the
back of the rooms and the rear of the cave, as commonly found in cliff
dwellings. Circular rooms are absent in the upper part of this ruin,
and kivas, if any, must be sought buried under the accumulated débris
of the lower part. The front wall of the upper house measures 64 feet,
and can be traced throughout its whole extent. At one end of the ruin
there are four narrow rooms separated by partitions, each containing
a grinding bin, where maize (corn) was reduced to meal. The remaining
rooms are roofless, plastered, and evidently used as dwellings. In
the lower series of rooms, buried beneath a mass of fallen rocks, are
circular depressions, which may be ceremonial rooms; but no excavations
were made in these depressions and their significance is unknown.</p>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp100" src="images/fig02.jpg" alt="" id="fig02">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 2.</span>—Ground plan of cliff ruin in Nashlini
Canyon.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Another cliff house, a few miles farther up in the canyon, is almost
hidden in an inaccessible recess of the cliff, but so high that it was
not visited.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">8</span></p>
<p>On the dizzy top of a cliff overlooking the canyon, near the second
ruin, artificial walls were observed but not visited. An Indian guide
claimed that they were towers; they are certainly so situated as to
permit a wide view up and down the canyon. These walls are mentioned by
Dr. Prudden.</p>
<p>On the walls of the canyon not far from the first ruin there is an
instructive group of pictographs (<a href="#fig03">fig. 3</a>) representing human beings,
some painted red, others white, standing in three lines. The majority
have triangular bodies with shoulders prolonged into arms at right
angles to the body; the forearms hanging from their extremities, as is
common in this region. On each side of the head are lateral extensions
recalling the whorls in which Hopi maidens still dress their hair, a
custom that has passed out of use among the other pueblos, but is still
preserved in personifying supernatural beings called Katcina maids. It
appears to have been a universal custom of the unmarried women among
the cliff dwellers to dress their hair in this fashion. These figures
are arranged in three rows; three individuals are depicted in the upper
row, four in the middle, and two in the lower row painted white, unlike
the others. Below the figures are rows of dots and several parallel
bars accompanied by a number of zigzag figures like lightning symbols.
On the supposition that the red figures represent Indian men or women,
the white figures may be white men and the dots and bars an aboriginal
count, the whole representing participants in some past event.</p>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp58" src="images/fig03.jpg" alt="" id="fig03">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 3.</span>—Pictographs near mouth of Nashlini
Canyon.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">9</span></p>
<h2>CHIN LEE CLIFF HOUSES</h2>
<p>Along southern tributaries of Chin Lee Valley there are instructive
cliff houses that have escaped the attention of archeologists. Judging
from his map, some of these may have been visited by Dr. Prudden for he
gives a figure of one of the two cliff ruins (<a href="#pl02a">pl. 2, fig. <i>a</i></a>),
in the Chin Lee, about 40 miles from Chin Lee postoffice. Their state
of preservation and the character of their sites may be judged from
the accompanying illustrations. These ruins were not visited, the
photographs (<a href="#pl02a">pl. 2, figs. <i>a–c</i></a>) having been presented by a Navaho
Indian, George H. Hoater, who made the pictures but did not know the
name of the ruin or of the canyon. There are other ruins in the Chin
Lee canyons, of which information is quite meager.</p>
<h2>RUINS NEAR GALLUP, NEW MEXICO</h2>
<p>The geographical position of the country about Gallup renders it a very
important area in the study of the migration of aboriginal peoples in
the Southwest. It lies midway between the Rio Grande on the east and
the Little Colorado on the west, and between the San Juan on the north
and the Zuñi on the south. In their intercommunication, the trails of
migration in prehistoric times must have crossed this region, and as
this migration was marked by successive stages where buildings were
constructed we should expect here to find remains of former migratory
peoples. Ruins in the vicinity of Gallup have been so much neglected
by students that our knowledge of this region is very fragmentary. To
remedy this condition the author made a few trips in this vicinity
with Mr. Sanderson and Mr. Bruce Draper, local students, who furnished
important aid. A number of pueblo sites and small cliff houses within
a few miles of the city were visited and superficially examined, but
no intensive work was done upon them. The ruins mentioned below are
only a few of those in this region that could be brought to light by
systematic scientific exploration. From his examination of them, it is
the author’s impression that the majority were inhabited by ancestors
of clans now domiciled in Zuñi.</p>
<h2>ZUÑI HILL RUINS</h2>
<p>This extensive ruin (pl. 3, <a href="#pl03a"><i>a</i></a>, <a href="#pl03c"><i>c</i></a>), 6 miles south from
Zuñi station on the Santa Fe railroad, and about 11 miles from Gallup,
lies almost directly opposite a conspicuous pinnacle of Wingate
sandstone called the Navaho Church. Its site is a low ridge extending
north and south for several hundred yards. None of the walls rise above
the mounds<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">10</span> which are highest on the west side. There are numerous
depressions scattered among the mounds which suggest subterranean rooms
of circular form. A round depression 40 feet in diameter shows the
remnant of a wall on one side. On a “flat” north of the ruin several
piles of stone can be seen, which are interpreted as isolated houses;
near one of them is a small fireplace made of slabs of rock set on edge
surrounding an enclosure filled with ashes. This is without exception
the largest cluster of mounds in the immediate neighborhood of Gallup,
and would well repay excavation and further study.</p>
<h2>KIT CARSON GROUP</h2>
<p>This group of mounds has received its name from Kit Carson Spring which
lies in their neighborhood. It is situated north of Navaho Church on an
elevation overlooking the road from Gallup to Crown Point. The members
of the group are numerous, but each mound is comparatively small. In
no case were walls found rising above the mounds, but as nearly as
could be judged from their shape, the buildings covered had rectangular
outlines and were accompanied by circular depressions. Fifty feet south
of the largest mound of this group there is a semicircular pile of
rocks which measures 42 feet on the south side, and with a radius of
30 feet from this side to the curved wall. The main ruin has lateral
extensions on the north and south ends, and measures 70 feet by 41
feet. The lateral extensions give the mounds the shape of the letter
<span class="sans">E</span> and enclose a square room of rectangular form measuring 20 by
15 feet.</p>
<h2>RUINS IN HEMLOCK CANYON</h2>
<p>Hemlock Canyon, north of the road from Gallup to Crown Point, has
the general features of other canyons in this neighborhood. At its
mouth there are fertile fields, and a good spring which a Navaho has
appropriated by building a hogan and fencing off the entrance. About
a half mile from this spring following the right bank of the arroyo,
which rarely contains water, there is a house (<a href="#pl11a">pl. 11, <i>a</i></a>) built
in a recess of the cliff about 10 feet above small scrub trees which
here grow in abundance. Its foundation is about 6 feet long, and the
wall is slightly curved and well constructed, showing a doorway shaped
like the letter <span class="sans">T</span>. This house is not regarded as a dwelling, for
it is too small for a family, and no household implements have been
found within the enclosure. It belongs rather to a type of cave-house
called “ledge rooms,” many examples of which occur<span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">11</span> near larger
dwellings. It was probably a storeroom, although possibly a retreat
where priests retired to pray for rain, as was once the custom among
the Hopi. The people to whom this house belonged probably dwelt near
their farms a short distance from the base of the cliff. There is a
similar room known to have been constructed by Navahos a few feet off
the road from Gallup to Crown Point, which is still used for a granary,
indicating the probable use of the small building here described.</p>
<h2>RUINS NEAR BLACK DIAMOND RANCH</h2>
<p>Black Diamond Ranch is 13 miles north of Hosta Butte. Mr. Bruce Draper,
who owns the ranch, pointed out near the mouth of a neighboring canyon
several comparatively large ruins. In one of the largest of these (<a href="#pl03b">pl.
3, <i>b</i></a>) near the ranch house, no walls are visible above ground,
but the surface presents abundant evidence of a buried ruin. In one
corner of this ruin (<a href="#pl03b">pl. 3, <i>b</i></a>) Mr. Bruce dug out a small room
which has good plastered walls, several feet high, and found decorative
bowls, some of which are here figured (figs. <a href="#fig04">4</a>, <a href="#fig05">5</a>). About 50 feet south
of this ruin, a low mound suggests a cemetery, and about the same
distance still farther south, a depression on the surface indicates a
circular subterranean room or reservoir.</p>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp70" src="images/fig04.jpg" alt="" id="fig04">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 4.</span>—Spherical bowl, Black Diamond Ranch. 7⅜
by 5 inches.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Following up this canyon nearly to its head, there is a small ruin
hardly worth mentioning save for a spiral incised pictograph 3 feet in
diameter identical with the snake symbols widely distributed throughout
the Southwest.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">12</span></p>
<p>In all the region north of the high ridge of eroded Wingate sandstone
there are several other groups of ruins with most of the walls very
much broken down. It would probably be conservative to state that there
were over 200 ruins, large and small, in this region, showing evidence
of a considerable population, if they were inhabited simultaneously.
Fragments of pottery occur on almost every ridge overlooking the
trails, especially along the road from Gallup to Crown Point. The forms
of these ruins vary and can be made out only by systematic excavation.</p>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp60" src="images/fig05.jpg" alt="" id="fig05">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 5.</span>—Mug with decoration half completed. 5½
by 4½ inches.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>So far as limited exploration about Gallup has gone, the investigations
by the author show that the ruins were inhabited by Zuñi clans, as
indicated in the structure of the buildings and the symbols on the
pottery. It would be important to determine the relative age of
these ruins compared with those about Zuñi; as to whether they were
peopled by colonies from Zuñi, or whether their inhabitants joined the
Zuñi population after deserting these houses. Although there is not
sufficient evidence to prove the latter proposition, the author is
inclined to accept it.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">13</span></p>
<h2>CROWN POINT RUINS</h2>
<p>No more interesting question in southwestern archeology awaits an
answer than the query: What became of the former inhabitants of the
Chaco ruins, one of the largest clusters of deserted buildings in
New Mexico? Like the cliff dwellers of the Mesa Verde, their former
inhabitants have disappeared and left no clue as to where they went,
the date of their occupation of the ruins, or their kinship with
other peoples. Existing legends relating to them among supposed
descendants who are thought to live in modern pueblos are fragmentary
and knowledge of their archeology is defective. The Hyde Expedition
made an extraordinary collection of artifacts from Pueblo Bonito, the
largest and formerly the best preserved ruin of the group, but the
excavations there have yielded little information on the kinship of
its inhabitants. Until we know more about the Chaco Canyon ruins we
are justified in the belief that there still remains a most important
problem for the archeologist to solve.</p>
<p>In seeking the prehistoric migration trail of the Hopi before they came
to Fire House, the author examined ruins near Crown Point identical
with those of the Chaco Canyon. There are in fact two ruins within a
few miles of the Crown Point Indian school, one of them known among
the Navaho Indians as Kin-a-a (the name of the other unknown to the
author), which are structurally members of the Chaco series.</p>
<p>The ground plan of the largest, Kin-a-a,<a id="FNanchor_7" href="#Footnote_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> is rectangular and was
apparently oriented north and south, the walls on the north side
being the highest and best preserved and those on the south possibly
terraced. On the south side remnants of a court or enclosure surrounded
by a low wall can still be detected. The ruin is compact with embedded
kivas and measures approximately 150 feet long by 100 feet wide, the
north walls rising in places to 50 feet, showing good evidences of
five stories, one above the other. The high walls reveal rooms of
rectangular shape. Situated midway in the length of the north wall (pl.
4, <a href="#pl04a"><i>a</i></a>, <a href="#pl04b"><i>b</i></a>, <a href="#pl04c"><i>c</i></a>) is a circular chamber like a kiva on
the ground floor, with high walls about it. The recesses between the
wall of the circular room and the rectangular wall enclosing it are
solidly filled in with masonry, a mode of construction adopted in the
great ruins of the Chaco Canyon. The kiva of Kin-a-a (pl. 5, <a href="#pl05a"><i>a</i></a>,
<a href="#pl05b"><i>b</i></a>), <span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">14</span>like those of the great building of the same canyon, are
built into the mass of rooms and not separated from them as in the
modern pueblos, Walpi, those of the Rio Grande, and the ruin of Sun
Temple on the Mesa Verde. This separation of the kiva from the house
mesa is regarded by the author as a late evolution, being unknown among
the cliff dwellers, and very rare in pueblo ruins possessing ancient
characteristics. A union or huddling together of sacred and secular
rooms is characteristic of the period when each kiva was limited to
the performance of clan rites, the separation of the kiva from secular
rooms marking the development of a fraternity of priests composed of
different clans. The diameter of the kiva in Kin-a-a is about 15 feet,
the average size of these rooms, no doubt determined by the length of
logs available for roofs. When the diameter is greater than that it
is customary to make the roof in a vaulted form by utilizing shorter
roofing, but kivas as small as 10 feet in diameter were sometimes
roofed by vaulting. Depressions, in mounds, measuring as much as 50
feet in diameter, in ruins in the Montezuma Valley have been identified
as circular ceremonial rooms, but as these have not been excavated,
there is always a doubt, for instead of being ceremonial and roofed
they may have been uncovered reservoirs for storage of water, for not
all circular depressions are kivas. In Far View Pueblo,<a id="FNanchor_8" href="#Footnote_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> in the Mummy
Lake Group, the author excavated a kiva 32 feet in diameter, which was
found to have pilasters for a vaulted roof. No such pilasters occur in
Kin-a-a, showing that the roof was flat with a central hatchway, as is
customary in all these rooms with two or more stories.</p>
<p>It is difficult to explain the enclosed space above the kiva in this
ruin. Was it occupied by rooms one above another, or was the lower
open to the sky? The rows of holes interpreted as indicating floors
is without significance, unless there were a number of superposed
rooms. It must be remembered that the ceremonial room or kiva, in
modern mythology, represents the underworld out of which, according
to legends, the early races of men emerged through an opening in the
roof or hatchway. Among the Hopi it is never covered by another room,
and this is carried so far that it is forbidden to walk on a roof
of a kiva, especially at a time when rites are being performed.<a id="FNanchor_9" href="#Footnote_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a>
Such an act would be regarded as sacrilegious, <span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">15</span>and the same taboo
is now probably universal: consequently walls constructed 40 feet
above the top of the kiva, showing evidence of rooms superposed in
stories, are exceptional. The object of rooms above a kiva can only be
surmised; possibly there may have been four kivas, one above another,
to represent the underworlds in which the ancestors of the human
race lived in succession before emerging into that in which we now
dwell. The inner walls of this kiva are shown in <a href="#pl05a">plate 5, <i>a</i></a>.
It was evident to the author when examining the inner wall of the
superposed room, above that identified as the kiva, that it belonged to
a room with a roof, as appears also from the view here given (<a href="#pl05a">pl. 5,
<i>a</i></a>). Whatever explanation of this exceptional condition may be
suggested, we cannot question the fact that here we have remains of a
kiva below one or more other rooms.<a id="FNanchor_10" href="#Footnote_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a></p>
<p>A well blazed trail passes the ruin and is lost in the distant hills.
This trail was at first mistaken for an irrigation ditch, but an
examination of its course shows that it runs up a steep hill, which
precludes such a theory. It is a section of an old Indian trail,
indications of which occur elsewhere in the State, a pathway over which
the rocks used in the construction of the ruins were transported. A
similar trail used for a like purpose is recorded near the great ruin
at Aztec, New Mexico.</p>
<h2>RUIN B NEAR CROWN POINT</h2>
<p>Ruin B (pl. 6, <a href="#pl06a"><i>a</i></a>, <a href="#pl06b"><i>b</i></a>), largely made up of a kiva of
circular form within a rectangular enclosure, lies near Crown Point
on top of a low plateau, back from the edge. Its name is unknown to
the author, but from its size and the character of its masonry it
must formerly have been of considerable importance. It was not, like
Kin-a-a, included in the President’s proclamation making the Chaco
Canyon ruins a National Monument. The appearance of the masonry and the
structure of the circular room, identified as a kiva, leads the author
to place it in the same class as the Chaco ruins, its nearest neighbor
being Kin-a-a, east of Crown Point. The excavation of this ruin might
shed instructive light on the extension or migration of the inhabitants
of the Chaco, after they left their homes in that canyon.</p>
<p>A ground plan of this ruin (<a href="#fig06">fig. 6</a>) shows that the standing walls are
rectangular and practically surround a circular room or kiva. <span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">16</span>The
walls are double, the interval between the inner wall and that of the
circular chamber being filled in with solid masonry.<a id="FNanchor_11" href="#Footnote_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> The outer of
the two enclosing rectangular walls is separated from the inner by an
interval of about 7 feet, and is connected with it by thin partitions,
somewhat analogous to those described as connecting the two concentric
walls<a id="FNanchor_12" href="#Footnote_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> of circular towers on the McElmo.</p>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp70" src="images/fig06.jpg" alt="" id="fig06">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 6.</span>—Ground plan of ruined kiva near Crown
Point.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>No other walls were observed above ground in this ruin, although
small piles of stone were noticed which may have been walls of other
buildings. The reason why the walls about the kiva have been preserved
so much longer than those of neighboring secular chambers,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">17</span> is probably
because of the universal care exercised by man in the construction of
the walls of religious buildings.</p>
<h2>POTTERY</h2>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp60" src="images/fig07.jpg" alt="" id="fig07">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 7.</span>—Decorated handled cup, Black Diamond
Ranch. 5½ by 4 inches.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Brief mention of ceramic objects found in the area considered in this
review is here introduced because they substantiate the evidences of
the buildings concerning the relationship of prehistoric people in
this neighborhood. Moreover, they add to our limited knowledge of the
arts in a little-known area. Very little has been recorded concerning
pottery from the ruins near Gallup, but the few known specimens do not
bear a sufficiently specialized symbolism to separate them from others
found in different geographical areas. Evidently no distinctive ceramic
area was developed in this region. Attention, however, may be called
to the fact that the symbols on pottery (<a href="#fig07">fig. 7</a>) represent the oldest
types, and that geometrical designs rather than conventional animal
figures predominate. The pottery<span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">18</span> suggests Zuñi ware, but is radically
different from modern Zuñi and has different symbols, showing, as far
as it goes, that settlements in which it occurs were made prior to the
development of modern Zuñi ceramic decorations which were influenced by
them. It has a likeness to old Zuñi ware, but has a closer resemblance
to fragments from the Crown Point Ruin, and the Chaco settlements,
which is significant.</p>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp60" src="images/fig08.jpg" alt="" id="fig08">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 8.</span>—Cooking pot, Black Diamond Ranch. 7½ by
6 inches.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Perhaps the most exceptional specimens obtained during the author’s
trip are two large, black jars (<a href="#fig08">fig. 8</a>), their color recalling Santa
Clara ware. The decoration on these jars takes the form of designs on
a raised zigzag band meandering about their necks, similar to pottery
used by the Navaho Indians. The informant, a reliable white man, claims
they are not Navaho work, and showed the locality near a ruined ancient
wall where he excavated them. He also reports a portion of a human
skeleton found in the same neighborhood which affords good indication
that they were mortuary, while the position of the grave would show
that they were deposited by the same people who inhabited the room
near by. The question is pertinent, however,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">19</span> whether they were not a
modern secondary burial; but if we accept this theory it indicates an
unusual condition, for the Navaho seldom bury their pottery as mortuary
offerings.<a id="FNanchor_13" href="#Footnote_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a></p>
<p>The author noticed, especially in his examination of the mounds near
Kit Carson Spring, certain foundation walls indicating small, circular,
buildings strung along in a row on the tops of ridges. One or two of
these suggest a round ruin near Zuñi, and seem to afford the missing
link in the prehistoric chain of settlements connecting the great
Chaco ruins<a id="FNanchor_14" href="#Footnote_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> with some of those in Zuñi valley. These important
similarities are supported by the traditions of the Zuñi that some of
their ancestors once inhabited the buildings on the Chaco; and the fact
that certain ruins, among them Kintiel, north of Navaho Springs, are
definitely claimed by the Zuñi to have been inhabited by their Corn
clan.</p>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp73" src="images/fig09.jpg" alt="" id="fig09">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 9.</span>—Decorative food bowl, Black Diamond
Ranch. 7 by 3 inches.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The black and white pottery, found about Gallup, is identical with
that of the latter ruin, and very similar to that generally found in
the earliest epoch of pueblo occupancy. As pointed out in an article
on Zuñi pottery, in the “Putnam Anniversary Volume,” modern Zuñi
pottery is so different from the ancient that we can hardly regard
it as evolved from it. The same is true among the Hopi; the modern
pottery decoration is not like the old, but is Tewa. Hopi-Tewa pottery
is largely the work of Nampeo, who once decorated her pottery solely
with Tewa symbols instead of old Hopi. In 1895 <span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">20</span>she abandoned the Tewa
symbols of her people to meet a demand for old pottery and substituted
for Tewa designs copies of ancient Hopi pottery from Sikyatki. Thus
there have been two radical changes in the style of Hopi pottery since
1710; one the substitution of Tewa designs for old Hopi, the other
a return to Sikyatki motifs within the last 20 years. This modern
innovation, however, has not been derived from the ancient by any
evolution, but by acculturation. Possibly a similar change has taken
place at Zuñi, calling for caution in supposing that pottery found in
the refuse heaps is necessarily evolved from that preexisting or found
in strata below it.</p>
<figure class="x-ebookmaker-drop">
<img class="illowp60" src="images/fig10.jpg" alt="" id="fig10">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 10.</span>—Decorated handled cup, Black Diamond
Ranch. 6⅜ by 5¼ inches.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The author has seen no evidence that would lead him to abandon the
theory, that the Zuñi valley was once peopled by clans related to those
on Little Colorado derived from the Gila, and that other clans drifted
into the valley from the north at a later date. These later additions
were from the circular ruin belt. Later came Tewa clans as the Asa of
the Hopi, and others. The author finds more evidences of acculturation
than autochthonous evolution in modern Zuñi, as in modern Hopi ceramic
symbols. Pottery (figs. <a href="#fig09">9</a>, <a href="#fig10">10</a>) found in ruins<span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">21</span> about Gallup belongs
to the same type as that from Kintiel which Cushing, from legendary
evidences, found to have been settled by Zuñi clans.<a id="FNanchor_15" href="#Footnote_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a></p>
<h2>RUINS IN HILL CANYON</h2>
<p>The country directly south of Ouray, Utah, is an unknown land to
the archeologist. Geologically speaking it is a very rugged region,
composed of eroded cliffs and deep canyons which up to within a few
years has been so difficult of access that white men have rarely
ventured into it. At present the country is beginning to be settled
and there are a few farms where the canyon broadens enough to afford
sufficient arable land for the needs of agriculture. The canyon is
very picturesque, the cliffs on either side rising from its narrow bed
by succession of natural steps (<a href="#pl07a">pl. 7, <i>a</i></a>) formed of sandstone
outcrops alternating with soft, easily eroded cretaceous rock. Its
many lateral contributing canyons are of small size, but extend deep
into the mountain in the recesses of which are said to be hidden many
isolated cave shelters, and other prehistoric remains. The cliffs and
canyons of this region are not unlike those farther south along the
Green and the Grand Rivers, a description of which, quoted from Prof.
Newberry,<a id="FNanchor_16" href="#Footnote_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> pictures vividly the appearance of the weird scenery in
these canyons. He says:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>From this point the view swept westward over a wide extent of
country in its general aspect a plane, but everywhere deeply cut by
a tangled maze of canyons and thickly set with towers, castles, and
spires of varied and striking forms; the most wonderful monuments
of erosion which our eyes already experienced in objects of this
kind had beheld. Near the mesa we are leaving stand detached
portions of it of every possible form from broad, flat tables, to
slender cones, crowned with pinnacles of the massive sandstone
which forms the perpendicular faces of the walls of the Colorado.
These castellated groups are from 1,000 to 5,000 feet in height,
and no language is adequate to convey a just idea of the strange
and impressive scenery formed by their grand and varied outlines.
Their appearance was so strange and beautiful as to call out
exclamations of delight from our party.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In this wild country up to his time rarely visited by white men, Prof.
Newberry also graphically described ruins not greatly unlike some of
those in Hill Canyon as follows:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Some two miles below the head of Labyrinth Canyon we came upon the
ruins of a large number of houses of stone. Evidently built by the
Pueblo<span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">22</span> Indians as they are similar to those on the Dolores, and
the pottery scattered about is identical with that before found in
so many places. It is very old but of excellent quality made of red
clay coated with white and handsomely figured. Here the houses are
built in sides of the cliffs. A mile or two below we saw others
crowning the inaccessible summits, inaccessible except by ladders,
of picturesque detached buttes of red sandstone, which rise to
the height of 150 feet above the bottom of the canyon. Similar
buildings were found lower down and broken pottery was picked up
upon the summits of the cliffs overhanging Grand River. Evidence
that these dreadful canyons were once the homes of families
belonging to that great people who formerly spread over all this
region now so utterly sterile, solitary and desolate.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Prof. Montgomery,<a id="FNanchor_17" href="#Footnote_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> in an article on the ruins in Nine Mile Canyon,
gives a description of similar prehistoric remains which he had found
in that region. From this description the author of the present paper
supposes that these ruins belong to the same type or one very similar
to those found in Hill Canyon. The antiquities Montgomery mentions are
well preserved, for he speaks of one of the towers in this region as
about 50 feet high, standing in an almost inaccessible spot commanding
a magnificent view of several canyons and mountains. He says:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>On the top of a mesa in an extremely dizzy situation, were the
remains of three small stone circular structures, two of which were
provided with roofs of heavy cedar logs and heavy, flat stones.
The logs and poles of these two structures would make about a cord
of wood, and they possessed distinct marks of the rude stone axes
with which they had been cut into suitable lengths. * * * On the
south side of the canyon, and about a mile from Brock’s Postoffice,
I explored a strong and well-built stone structure, which stood
upon a high and precipitous cliff. It formed about the two-thirds
of a circle, being 14 feet long, 12 feet wide, and 5½ feet high,
and was completed by a cliff in its rear. * * * In a short time
we came to the rock column, which, although hard and solid was
much disintegrated and had been vertically cleft and separated,
leaving a dangerous gap between its two inclined and overhanging
portions. By the aid of cedar poles we succeeded in clambering to
its summit, and there, in a situation that commanded a magnificent
view of many canyons and hills, we found the ruin of four circular
stone structures which, in my opinion had once been a look-out, and
signal military station. They were arranged upon the flat top of
the rock in such a manner that three smaller ones, each capable of
holding but one man, occupied the front and most exposed places,
one of them being in advance of the other two, which were nearer
the sides of the rock. The fourth and largest stone structure held
a place several yards in the rear of the three small ones, but from
it a clear view of a wide and extended tract of country could also
be obtained. They were all destitute of openings except at the top,
and their walls sloped inward from below, so that the opening in
each of the three small structures was small and only sufficient to
allow the entrance or exit of one person.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">23</span></p>
<p>The author’s attention was called to ruins in Hill Canyon like those
above mentioned, by Mr. A. H. Kneale, agent of the Utes at Fort
Duchesne, Utah, and at the close of work at Mesa Verde a trip was
made into the region where they are found. The route was from Grand
Junction, Colorado, to Mack, Utah, by rail, thence by rail to the end
of the road at Watson. The trip from Watson to Ouray was by automobile.
At Ouray the author outfitted with wagon, forded the Duchesne River,
and crossed the Green River by ferry. Later he proceeded south to Squaw
Crossing on Willow Creek, and thence to Taylor’s ranch, in the midst of
the ruins of Hill Canyon.</p>
<p>The ruins mentioned below were visited, but many others were reported
by cowboys which were not seen on account of limitation in time, the
object of the visit being primarily a reconnoissance.</p>
<p>The following ruins were seen by the author and his companions during
their short visit to this region:</p>
<p>1. Ruins <i>A</i> and <i>B</i>, on the canyon rim within sight of
Taylor’s lower ranch.</p>
<p>2. Two ruins on pinnacles of rocks 1½ miles from Taylor’s lower ranch
following the canyon southward.</p>
<p>3. Tower ruin crowning a leaning pinnacle.</p>
<p>4. Ruin on top of a plateau with precipitous sides, in middle of a
canyon 3 miles south of Taylor’s lower ranch.</p>
<p>5. Walls on top of an inverted cone, 6 miles up the canyon from
Taylor’s lower ranch.</p>
<p>6. Several towers in a cluster on a point of the plateau 8 miles below
Taylor’s lower ranch.</p>
<p>The above ruins may be classified into two types distinguished by the
character of their site: (a) True “mushroom rock ruins,” as their name
implies, are perched on tops of isolated rock pinnacles resembling the
so-called Snake rock at Walpi, and (b) the second type, crown spurs of
the mesa overlooking the canyon. The pinnacle foundations of the former
are the last stage in erosion of a spur from the side of the canyon. It
is doubtful whether these pinnacles were cut off by erosion before or
after the buildings thereon were constructed. On the whole both types
of ruins in Hill Canyon present no architectural differences from those
found in some of the tributary canyons of the Colorado River.</p>
<p>The author’s visit to the Hill Canyon region was mainly a
reconnoissance to verify reports of the existence of prehistoric
remains in this little-known region. He was accompanied by Mr. T. G.
Lemmon of Dallas, Texas, a volunteer, who furnished the Hill<span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">24</span> Canyon
pictures here reproduced. Mr. Owen, the official farmer of the Ute
reservation, and an Indian boy accompanied us, the former as guide, the
latter as driver. In penetrating this secluded country we were obliged
to camp along the way, but were hospitably received by the few ranchmen
along the route and made our home for a few days at Taylor’s lower
ranch while making our excursions to the ruins. It is a great pleasure
to acknowledge this aid and especially that of Mr. Kneale, who aided us
in outfitting at Ouray.</p>
<p>The best preserved examples of characteristic Hill Canyon Ruins
belong to the second type, or those not isolated from the neighboring
plateau, the most striking of which belong to the mushroom type.
Both have a general similarity in circular form and massive walls,
recalling, except in poor quality of masonry the so-called “towers”
of the McElmo Canyon. They resemble the “Tower ruin,” found by Prof.
Montgomery, in Nine Mile Canyon, on the western slope of the range.
Their masonry is composed of natural slabs of rock, rudely fashioned by
fracture, but rarely dressed in cubical blocks, as in the towers on the
McElmo Canyon. Their exposure to the elements has led to considerable
destruction, the adobe in which the walls were laid having been washed
out of the joints. The lower courses of stone, as seen in the view
of the large ruin perched high above the ranch house, were of larger
stones than the upper, and showed more evidences of having been dressed
than the flat stones piled one on the other, which form the upper
courses.</p>
<h2>RUINS NEAR TAYLOR’S LOWER RANCH</h2>
<h3><span class="smcap">Ruin A</span></h3>
<figure class="figcenter">
<img class="illowp92" src="images/fig11.jpg" alt="" id="fig11">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 11.</span>—Ground plan of ruin A, Hill Canyon,
Utah.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The two large buildings near Taylor’s lower ranch, ruins A and B, are
typical of the first group, the most conspicuous of which, ruin A, is
shown in the accompanying figures (<a href="#pl07b">pl. 7, <i>b</i></a>, <a href="#pl08a">pl. 8, <i>a</i></a>).
This ruin stands on the point of a high cliff, inaccessible except
on the west side. Although the special features of the masonry are
somewhat obscured by fallen sections, and the form (<a href="#fig05">fig. 5</a>) is hidden,
it is a circular enclosure about 25 feet in diameter, its wall being
about 13 feet high, at the highest point. Between this high outer
wall (<a href="#fig11">fig. 11</a>) and that of the inner circle, there are remains of a
banquette or bench, surrounding the chamber very much broken down. The
lower stones are much larger than the upper, similar in this respect to
the walls of certain cliff dwellings. The circular room and
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">25</span>
bench once covered the point of the mesa, and is separated from the
plateau by a deep fissure worn in the rock outside the wall on that
side. The height of the highest wall is 20 feet, and the bench around
the circular portion averages 3 feet high. In thickness the walls
vary from 1 to 3 feet. On the second ledge, or outcrop of hard rock
below the summit of the cliff, on which ruin A stands, there is a fine
example of the dug-out type of habitation, several of which occur in
the sides of this canyon. The roof of this type of dug-out is formed by
a flat slab of rock projecting horizontally from the cliff and forming
the protection for a chamber excavated in the soft rock below. In some
instances these dugouts have rudely constructed lateral and front walls
but none of them has more than one room. They appear<span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">26</span> to have been
inhabited rooms but may at times have served for shelter.<a id="FNanchor_18" href="#Footnote_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a></p>
<h3><span class="smcap">Ruin B</span></h3>
<figure class="figcenter">
<img class="illowp73" src="images/fig12.jpg" alt="" id="fig12">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 12.</span>—Ground plan of ruin B.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Ruin B (pls. <a href="#pl07b">7</a>, <a href="#pl08b">8</a>, <i>b</i>) is a better preserved example of the tower
type and is on a ridge considerably lower than that on which ruin A
stands extending at right angles. It occupies a narrow space from the
rim of Hill Canyon on one side to a rim of a tributary canyon, blocking
the passageway along the surface of the ridge to its point. This
structure (<a href="#fig12">fig. 12</a>) would appear to be structurally not unlike ruin A,
but with the wall smaller. There is a raised bench on the south side,
the tower itself being a semi-circular chamber annexed to the north
side, which extends from one canyon rim to another. The breadth of this
semi-circular room is 10 feet. The longest dimension is 31 feet and the
average height of its wall is 4 feet. The top of the wall, throughout,
is unevenly broken down, the part adjoining the bench being the best
preserved. The structure suggests a fort, for it would not be possible
to pass between this obstructing ruin without entering it through a
circular doorway, the walls of which still stand on the east side.
There is no passage between the wall and the mesa edge.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">27</span></p>
<h3><span class="smcap">Long Mesa Ruin</span></h3>
<figure class="figcenter">
<img class="illowp33" src="images/fig13.jpg" alt="" id="fig13">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 13.</span>—Ground plan of towers on Long Mesa.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>On the flat top of a long and narrow mesa (pl. 9, <a href="#pl09a"><i>a</i></a>, <a href="#pl09b"><i>b</i></a>)
rising about 200 feet from the middle of Hill Creek Canyon a few miles
above Taylor’s ranch, there is a cluster of three circular ruins, whose
walls are composed of well constructed masonry, now much dilapidated.
The surface of this plateau, near the end looking down the canyon, is
partitioned off from the remainder by a low transverse wall, extending
from one side to the other. This wall was built advantageously for
defense and apparently designed to prevent passage of foes from the
upper end of the plateau into the area where the circular rooms are
situated. About midway in its length it has a passageway, the jambs of
which are still visible. Three circular ruins (<a href="#fig13">fig. 13</a>) make up the
cluster on the lower end of the mesa, each averaging about 15 feet in
diameter, all constructed of low walls<span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">28</span> of stones dressed into proper
shape. These buildings are not connected but separated by intervals.
The tops of the walls for several feet have fallen, exposing interiors
which are almost completely filled with stones and rubble.</p>
<figure class="figcenter">
<img class="illowp54" src="images/fig14.jpg" alt="" id="fig14">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 14.</span>—Ground plan of Eight Mile Ruin.</figcaption>
</figure>
<h3><span class="smcap">Eight Mile Ruin</span></h3>
<p>Eight Mile Ruin (<a href="#pl10a">pl. 10</a>) is the largest and most conspicuous of the
Hill Creek remains. It consists of a cluster of towers on a cliff
overlooking the right side of the canyon below Taylor’s ranch and from
the bottom of the canyon resembles a single large building. It is made
up of several circular towers, with passageways between which preserve
all the typical features of this style of ruins. When this cluster is
examined individually it is found to be composed of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">29</span> round rooms, a
semi-circular building, and a rectangular room (<a href="#fig14">fig. 14</a>). The basal
courses of the masonry are constructed of massive, almost megalithic,
rocks. The walls of the rectangular building are particularly well
made, and enclose a room filled to the top with clay mixed with fallen
rubble. The longest side of this room extends north and south. The
whole cluster is approximately 70 feet in length. The diameter of the
circular rooms varies, the outside measurement of the larger ones being
about 20 feet, while the smallest is barely large enough for a man to
stand in with comfort. The semi-circular room is 14 feet in diameter.
The axis of these rooms extends approximately in a north-south
direction. So far as could be traced each of the larger circular ruins
has on the inside an elevated banquette surrounding it, and enclosed in
a wall, reaching a height of 10 feet. There is much fallen rock within
these enclosures concealing their floors and rendering it impossible to
trace properly the course of the banquette or interpret its relation.
Another ruin of the same general plan, but smaller, is a little farther
down on the same side of the canyon. Its walls have tumbled almost to
their foundations, and are inconspicuous, resembling piles of stone.</p>
<p>The essential architectural feature of the Hill Canyon towers is their
circular form, modified in many instances by the addition of a straight
wall or rectangular annex. In certain cases the enclosing walls of
two towers have fused, while in the Eight Mile Ruin the towers are
accompanied by a rectangular room separated a short distance from them.</p>
<p>None of these towers show any evidences of past habitation and, what is
remarkable, no fragments of pottery occur on the surface of the plateau
in their neighborhood. Not far from the tower (<a href="#pl10a">pl. 10, <i>a</i></a>), there
was picked up a mealing stone similar to those used by pueblo Indians
in grinding corn, but no accompanying metate was found. No excavations
were attempted.</p>
<h3><span class="smcap">Mushroom Rock Ruins</span></h3>
<p>The structure of the ruins of the mushroom rock type is not radically
different from that of the towers above described, they being
exceptional only in their unusual sites. They occur on top of eroded
pillars of rock, often enlarged on top, reminding one of mushrooms,
like the so-called Snake rock at Walpi. They were once extensions or
spurs of the mesa but are now rock pillars cut off by erosion so that
they stand out isolated from the rim of the canyon.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">30</span> On account of the
difficulty in reaching their tops, the ground plan of many could not be
observed, but with a glass it was seen that as a rule they conform to
the shape of the rim of the rock on which they stand. Considering the
unusual sites of these inaccessible buildings, the question naturally
arises, How could the ancient dwellers enter these rooms? Had they
ladders or ropes, or were footholes cut in the side of the cliff to aid
them? If the theory of footholes be correct we may suppose that these
have been worn away, for no trace of them could be found.</p>
<p>A geological question might likewise suggest itself to anyone seeing
the evidences of erosion between the cliffs and pinnacles. Has the gap
between the latter and the edge of the plateaux been ploughed out by
the water since the building on the former were constructed? Although
the cliffs show that the amount of the erosion has been enormous, it
must be borne in mind that the prevailing rock is soft sandstone, the
wearing away of which would not necessarily require a great period of
time. It is not probable that these pinnacles have been separated by
erosion from the cliff since man constructed the walls upon them, but
this question involves the knowledge of a geological expert.</p>
<p>To the same group of ruins as the mushroom type belongs one from a
wholly different locality, shown in <a href="#pl12a">plate 12, <i>a</i></a>, a photograph
of which was given the author by Mr. Chubbock. In this case the ruin
is not built on top of a rock pinnacle, in the shape of an inverted
cone, but in the horizontal fissure or constriction worn out under the
harder stratum above it. The building in this cleft is in fact a kind
of cliff house in which the front wall extends from top to bottom of
the crevice, the rooms occupying a recess back of this wall. A somewhat
similar form of habitation found in the side of a cliff has been
described by the author.<a id="FNanchor_19" href="#Footnote_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> It was discovered in the Verde Valley,
Arizona, near Jordan’s ranch, about 6 miles from Jerome, Arizona. In
his description it is classified as a “ledge house,” a type where the
opening into the cave is completely walled up. Unlike a true cliff
dwelling the rooms occupy the whole of a natural cave the top of which
is its roof. It is not possible to determine from the illustration
here shown whether or not the recess has been enlarged by artificial
means, and as the author has not visited the ruin he has no idea of the
arrangement of rooms.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">31</span></p>
<h3><span class="smcap">Inverted Cone Ruin</span></h3>
<figure class="figcenter">
<img class="illowp73" src="images/fig15.jpg" alt="" id="fig15">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 15.</span>—Inverted cone ruin.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The best example of the mushroom type of ruin, shown in the
accompanying figure (<a href="#fig15">fig. 15</a>) is about 6 miles up the canyon from
Taylor’s ranch on the right hand side of Hill Canyon. It is clearly
visible from the road which follows the stream and has a wide outlook
up and down the valley. Although the top of the rock on which this
ruin stands would at first sight appear to be inaccessible, Mr. Owen,
by means of a log, surmounted it and reported that its surface is flat
and that the walls thereon are about 20 feet long and five feet wide,
enclosing a roughly oval chamber, as their outline follows the rim of
the top of the rock. These walls, when seen from the road with a good
glass, appear as low ridges constructed of indifferent masonry.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">32</span></p>
<h3><span class="smcap">Twin Towers</span></h3>
<figure class="figcenter">
<img class="illowp73" src="images/fig16.jpg" alt="" id="fig16">
<figcaption><span class="smcap">Fig. 16.</span>—Mushroom rock ruins.</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Twin pinnacles, shown in figure 16, were observed from the road about 3
miles up the canyon from Taylor’s ranch. Fragments of walls existed on
top of both of these pinnacles, but as it was impossible to reach them
on account of the erosion at their bases the form and condition of the
walls were impossible to determine. Like the tower<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">33</span> last mentioned, the
view from their tops stretches several miles in both directions up and
down the canyon.</p>
<h3><span class="smcap">Ruin on Leaning Pinnacle</span></h3>
<p>The author’s limited visit to this region made it impossible to record
all the various shapes of eroded pinnacles bearing buildings found in
Hill Canyon, but one of the most remarkable of these foundations was
observed to lean very perceptibly to one side (<a href="#pl13">pl. 13</a>) so that one side
of the ruin barely falls within the line of stable equilibrium. The
top of this leaning pinnacle was inaccessible, the height being about
50 feet from the base, which rose from a narrow ridge over 200 feet
above the plain. The author’s idea of the ground plan and character
of the masonry in this ruin is limited to what could be seen from the
road, but its general appearance from that distance is the same as the
preceding ruin.</p>
<p>In this account the author has mentioned a few of the more prominent
mushroom rock ruins, confining himself to those which can be observed
in a hurried visit to the canyon. It is undoubtedly true, as reported
by several cowboys, that the side canyons, difficult of access,
concealed many others which a longer visit would bring to light. The
characteristics of the ruin crowned pinnacles, or leaning buttresses of
rock in Hill Canyon are shown in <a href="#pl13">plate 13</a>.</p>
<h2>CONCLUSIONS</h2>
<p>As artifacts were not found in or near the buildings on the Hill Canyon
cliffs, and as the ruins show no evidence of former habitation, it is
evident that they were not dwellings. Their use and the kinship of
the people who built them can be judged only by what is left of their
walls and the character of their masonry. As has been pointed out, the
most prominent of these ruins are circular rooms or towers, arranged
in clusters, for an interpretation of which we may look to similar
architectural forms found elsewhere in the Southwest.</p>
<p>Their commanding position suggests that these towers were constructed
for lookouts and for defense, but the questions might very pertinently
be asked, Why should either of these uses necessitate three or four
almost identical buildings grouped together, when one would be
sufficient? Why are some of them in places where there is no broad
outlook?</p>
<p>The massive character of the walls suggests a fortification, but why
if defense were the only explanation of their use would not one large<span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">34</span>
building be preferable to many, especially as it would be more easily
constructed. It might be urged that they were granaries; but if so, why
were they placed in such a conspicuous situation?</p>
<p>In searching for an explanation for the construction of these
buildings, an examination was made of aboriginal towers in the valley
of the San Juan and its tributaries, especially the Yellow Jacket
Canyon and those tributaries entering it on the northern side. In the
Mesa Verde National Park the author has also discovered several towers
which are in a comparatively good state of preservation. Some of these
are situated on high cliffs, others stand in valleys hidden by dense
forests of cedar.</p>
<p>Towers are, roughly speaking, scattered sporadically in numbers over
a wide extent of country, bounded on the east by Dolores River and on
the south by the Mancos River and the San Juan. They extend as far west
as Montezuma Creek, following it up north as far as exploration has
gone and occurring as far south as Zuñi. Rarely, if ever, however, do
we find towers in the dry, sandy, wastes south of the San Juan, and
they are unrepresented in the great ruins of the Chaco Canyon. Although
there seemed to be certain minor differences in the construction of
towers found at different places in this area of distribution, all are
identical in essential features.</p>
<p>The towers of Hill Canyon bear a close likeness to those in the region
mentioned, except that their masonry is poorer and their walls are more
dilapidated. This can be ascribed in part to the material out of which
they are built, for whereas the stone in the southern part of the area
is soft and easily worked, that in the Hill Canyon region is hard but
can readily be split into slabs which did not require much manipulation
to bring them into desired shapes for use. The tall and better built
towers of the San Juan (<a href="#pl14a">pl. 14, <i>a</i></a>) and its tributaries are
sometimes single rooms without connections with other buildings, but
are more often surrounded at their bases by rooms not unlike those of
pueblo ruins. Thus at Cannon Ball ruin the towers rise from the midst
of secular rooms and the same is true of the tower in Cliff Palace and
elsewhere. This leads to the supposition that these buildings were
constructed for some purpose other than as lookouts: they bear all the
outward appearance of sacred rooms called kivas of pueblos and cliff
dwellers. If we accept this explanation<a id="FNanchor_20" href="#Footnote_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> that the McElmo towers are
round kivas, as suggested by Holmes, Morgan,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">35</span> and others we can explain
why several are united in a cluster, for it would seem that each room
in such a cluster belonged to a family or clan. The use of these towers
as here suggested can not, however, be proven until excavations of
them are made and the signification of the banquette constantly found
annexed to their inner wall is determined.</p>
<p>Several structural remains in Ruin Canyon (<a href="#pl14b">pl. 14, <i>b</i></a>), a
tributary of the Yellow Jacket, especially those at the head of
the South Fork, give a good idea of the relation of the tower to
surrounding rooms. Here we find towers constructed of fine, well
preserved, masonry rising to almost their original height, but crowded
into the midst of rectangular rooms imparting to the whole ruin a
compact rectangular form. Several towers in this canyon are without
surrounding rooms, others have rectangular, square or <span class="sans">D</span>-shaped
ground plans, but the author studied none with two or three concentric
surrounding walls.</p>
<p>The form of one of the largest ruins in Ruin Canyon situated near the
fork of the canyon, closely resembles Far View House, in the Mesa Verde
National Park. It has a central tower around which are rooms with
straight walls, the intervals between which and the circular wall of
the tower having a roughly triangular shape. While there is but one
tower in this ruin, its similarity in form and position to the large
central kiva of Far View House indicates that towers in the McElmo are
practically ceremonial rooms, as has been long suspected.</p>
<p>This identity in form of tower and round kiva and the relative
abundance of both in the San Juan drainage, leads the author to
believe that one was derived from the other, in that district, and
spread from it southward and westward until, very much modified, it
reached the periphery of the pueblo area. It is believed that, in
the earliest time, the isolated tower was constructed for ceremonial
purposes and that rooms for habitations were dugouts or other
structures architecturally different from it. Later, domiciles were
constructed around the base of these towers until they encircled them
in a compact mass of rooms. The tower then lost its apparent height,
but morphologically retained its form. As this circular type of kiva
spread into the pueblo area in course of time it was again constructed
independently of the domiciles and the relative numbers diminished
until, as in some of the pueblos of the Rio Grande, there survive only
one or two kivas for each village, but these are no longer embedded in
habitations as in the more advanced archaic conditions.</p>
<p>The tower kiva may be regarded as the nucleus of the clan, or the
building erected for ceremonies of that clan, the earliest and best<span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">36</span>
constructed stone structures in the region where the pueblo originated.
Where there were several clans there were several towers; when one
clan, a single tower. In course of time rooms for habitation or
possibly for other purposes, clustered about these towers; these units
consolidated with rooms and kivas of another type forming a composite
pueblo. In this form we find the towers rising above a mass of secular
rooms. The archaic form of ceremonial room or tower survived in Cliff
Palace and other Mesa Verde ruins.<a id="FNanchor_21" href="#Footnote_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a></p>
<p>Several circular kivas and towers seen by the author have one or more
incised stones, bearing a coiled figure resembling a serpent. One of
the best of these has also peripheral lines like conventional symbols
of feathers. An obscure legend of the Hopi recounts that the ancestral
kivas of the Snake clan, when it lived at Tokonabi, or along the San
Juan were circular in form. While at present only a suggestion, it is
not improbable that towers and round kivas may have been associated
with Snake ceremonials, especially as this cult is known to have
survived among Keresan pueblos like Sia and Acoma. The Snake clan of
the Hopi according to traditions came from the north or the region of
circular kivas.</p>
<p>From their similarity in external shape and distribution, circular
ruins and round towers have been regarded as in some way connected.
It by no means follows that rooms inside their external walls were
identical in use. For instance, the so-called Great Tower on the cliffs
overlooking the San Juan, described and figured by Prof. Holmes, is
said by him to measure 140 feet in diameter, and to have double walls
connected by partitions, forming a series of encircling rooms. This
ruin may be classified not as a tower but a circular ruin, and the
same may be said of the so-called Triple-wall Tower, rising on the
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">37</span>border of rectangular rooms, situated at the mouth of the McElmo. The
dimensions of this so-called tower are reported to be “almost” the
same as the Great Tower. The author regards these as examples of an
architectural type related to towers, from which it is distinguished
not only by size, but also, especially, by the arrangement of rooms
on their peripheries. The internal structure of the tower type is
little known, but in none of these buildings has the author detected
peripheral rooms separated by radial partitions, although one of these
radial partitions is found in kiva A of Sun Temple. The original
building of the last mentioned ruin, although <span class="sans">D</span>-shaped, has a
morphological similarity in the arrangement of peripheral rooms to the
“Great Tower” of the San Juan, or that on the alluvial flat in the
Mancos, and the “Triple-wall Tower” room of the McElmo, save that the
so-called innermost of the triple walls is replaced in Sun Temple by
two circular walls, side by side, forming kivas B and C.</p>
<p>The tower, with annexed rectangular rooms, like its homologue, the
circular kiva with similar adjacent chambers surrounding it, is
practically the “unit type,” a stage of pueblo development pointed
out by Doctor Prudden,<a id="FNanchor_22" href="#Footnote_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a> who does not make as much as would the
author of the intra-mural condition of the kiva, or its compact union
with domiciliary rooms. Far View House on the Mesa Verde is a good
example of this union of form, characteristic of the “unit type” or
compact pueblo with embedded circular kivas, one of which is central,
probably the first constructed, and of large size. Such compact pueblos
are numerous on the Mesa Verde, judging from central depressions in
mounds, and characteristic of the San Juan, at least of its northern
tributaries. The previous stage in pueblo development is that in
which the sanctuary or tower (kiva) and habitation are distinct. The
extra-mural circular kiva,<a id="FNanchor_23" href="#Footnote_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> or circular room separated from the
house masses either in courts, as in Rectangular and Round villages,
or situated outside the same as in “Line villages,” like Walpi, or
pyramidal forms, is like Zuñi or Taos and more modern pueblos. This
modification is widely distributed in ruins south of the San Juan,
still persisting in several modern pueblos.</p>
<p>The above observations have an important bearing on the author’s
differentiation of the village Indians of the Southwest, into two
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">38</span>groups, which are culturally distinct and widely distributed
geographically. The western group originated in the Gila Valley, and
extending across Arizona spread northward making its influence felt as
far as the Hopi villages; the eastern culture was born in Colorado and
Utah and extended to the south along a parallel zone. The former sprang
into being in low, level, cactus plains; while the latter was born in
lofty mountains and deep canyons filled with caves. Each reflects in
its architecture the characteristic environment of the locality of its
origin. As they spread from their homes and at last came together each
modified the other by acculturation. The expansion of these two nuclei
of culture, and the products of their contact is the prehistoric,
unwritten, evolution of primitive people in the Southwest upon which
documentary accounts throw no light, and the function of archeology
is to read this history through the remains left by this prehistoric
people, as interpreted by surviving folklore, ceremonials, legends,
and artifacts. Both types of culture reached their highest development
before the arrival of the white man; and the advent of the European
found both on the decline. The localities where both types originated
and reached their highest development were either no longer inhabited
or occupied by descendants with modified architectural ideas. Some of
the survivors lived in houses of much ruder construction than the cliff
dwellings or pueblos of their ancestors. The habitations of others were
scattered rude, mud huts. In short the cliff dwellers of the Mesa Verde
and the prehistoric inhabitants of the Gila compounds left survivors
possessed of inferior skill. Both architecture and ceramic art had
declined before the advent of white men.</p>
<figure class="figcenter mt5" id="pl01">
<div class="attr">PL. 1</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate01a.jpg" alt="">
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate01b.jpg" alt="">
<figcaption>TEBUNGKI FIRE HOUSE, ARIZONA.</figcaption>
</figure>
<figure class="figcenter mt5">
<div class="attr">PL. 2</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate02a.jpg" alt="" id="pl02a">
<div class="center">a.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate02b.jpg" alt="" id="pl02b">
<div class="center">b.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate02c.jpg" alt="" id="pl02c">
<div class="center">c.</div>
<figcaption>CLIFF DWELLINGS IN CHIN LEE CANYON, ARIZONA.<br>
a, b, Ruin A.<br>
c, Ruin B.<br>
(Photographs by G. H. Hoater.)</figcaption>
</figure>
<figure class="figcenter mt5">
<div class="attr">PL. 3</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate03a.jpg" alt="" id="pl03a">
<div class="center">a.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate03b.jpg" alt="" id="pl03b">
<div class="center">b.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate03c.jpg" alt="" id="pl03c">
<div class="center">c.</div>
<figcaption>SITES OF RUINS NEAR GALLUP, NEW MEXICO.<br>
a, Zuñi Hill Ruin.<br>
b, Black Diamond Ranch Ruin.<br>
c, Kiva of Zuñi Hill Ruin.</figcaption>
</figure>
<figure class="figcenter mt5">
<div class="attr">PL. 4</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate04a.jpg" alt="" id="pl04a">
<div class="center">a.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate04b.jpg" alt="" id="pl04b">
<div class="center">b.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate04c.jpg" alt="" id="pl04c">
<div class="center">c.</div>
<figcaption>KIN-A-A, CROWN POINT, NEW MEXICO.<br>
a, b, From west.<br>
c, Showing mounds near Kiva.</figcaption>
</figure>
<div class="right small mt5">PL. 5</div>
<div class="col50 clear">
<figure>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate05a.jpg" alt="" id="pl05a">
<figcaption>a.</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<div class="col50">
<figure>
<img style="width: 99%;" src="images/plate05b.jpg" alt="" id="pl05b">
<figcaption>b.</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<div class="center"><b>KIN-A-A.<br>
a, Inner wall of second story of Kiva.<br>
b, Outer wall of Kiva.</b></div>
<figure class="figcenter mt5">
<div class="attr">PL. 6</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate06a.jpg" alt="" id="pl06a">
<div class="center">a.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate06b.jpg" alt="" id="pl06b">
<div class="center">b.</div>
<figcaption>CROWN POINT, RUIN B.<br>
a, From east.<br>
b, From north.</figcaption>
</figure>
<div class="right small mt5">PL. 7</div>
<div class="col50 clear">
<figure>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate07a.jpg" alt="" id="pl07a">
<figcaption>a.</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<div class="col50">
<figure>
<img style="width: 99%;" src="images/plate07b.jpg" alt="" id="pl07b">
<figcaption>b.</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<div class="center">HILL CANYON UTAH.<br>
a, Ruins A and B.<br>
b, View up the canyon.<br>
(Photographs by T. G. Lemmon.)</div>
<figure class="figcenter mt5">
<div class="attr">PL. 8</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate08a.jpg" alt="" id="pl08a">
<div class="center">a.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate08b.jpg" alt="" id="pl08b">
<div class="center">b.</div>
<figcaption>RUINS NEAR TAYLOR’S LOWER RANCH, HILL CANYON, UTAH.<br>
a, Ruin A.<br>
b, Ruin B.<br>
(Photographs by T. G. Lemmon.)</figcaption>
</figure>
<figure class="figcenter mt5">
<div class="attr">PL. 9</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate09a.jpg" alt="" id="pl09a">
<div class="center">a.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate09b.jpg" alt="" id="pl09b">
<div class="center">b.</div>
<figcaption>LONG MESA, HILL CANYON, UTAH.<br>
a, From north.<br>
b, From south.<br>
(Photographs by T. G. Lemmon.)</figcaption>
</figure>
<figure class="figcenter mt5">
<div class="attr">PL. 10</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate10a.jpg" alt="" id="pl10a">
<div class="center">a.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate10b.jpg" alt="" id="pl10b">
<div class="center">b.</div>
<figcaption>EIGHT MILE RUIN, HILL CANYON, UTAH.<br>
a, From south.<br>
b, From west.<br>
(Photographs by T. G. Lemmon.)</figcaption>
</figure>
<div class="right small mt5">PL. 11</div>
<div class="col50 clear">
<figure>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate11a.jpg" alt="" id="pl11a">
<figcaption>a.</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<div class="col50">
<figure>
<img style="width: 99%;" src="images/plate11b.jpg" alt="" id="pl11b">
<figcaption>b.</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<div class="center">a, Storage room, Hemlock Canyon, New Mexico.<br>
b, Mushroom Rock without ruin on top, McElmo Canyon, Utah.</div>
<figure class="figcenter mt5">
<div class="attr">PL. 12</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate12a.jpg" alt="" id="pl12a">
<div class="center">a.<br>
(Photograph by Chubbock.)</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate12b.jpg" alt="" id="pl12b">
<div class="center">b.<br>
(Photograph by T. G. Lemmon.)</div>
<figcaption>a, Ledge House in cleft of mushroom rock.<br>
b, Tower in cedars near Sprucetree House, Mesa Verde National Park.</figcaption>
</figure>
<figure class="figcenter mt5" id="pl13">
<div class="attr">PL. 13</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate13.jpg" alt="">
<figcaption>RUIN ON ROCK PINNACLE, HILL CANYON.</figcaption>
</figure>
<figure class="figcenter mt5">
<div class="attr">PL. 14</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate14a.jpg" alt="" id="pl14a">
<div class="center">a.</div>
<img class="illowp100" src="images/plate14b.jpg" alt="" id="pl14b">
<div class="center">b.</div>
<figcaption>RUINS IN SOUTHFORK, RUIN CANYON, UTAH.<br>
a, Twin Towers.<br>
b, Towers and buildings.</figcaption>
</figure>
<div class="footheader">FOOTNOTES:</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="label">[1]</a> 17th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnology, Part 2.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2" class="label">[2]</a> Called by the Navaho, Beshbito, Piped Water; from a
metallic pipe at the spring.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3" class="label">[3]</a> 8th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnology, 1886–’87 (1901).
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_4" href="#FNanchor_4" class="label">[4]</a> An able discussion of the pueblo problems is found in
the excellent compilation of Fritz Krause, Die Pueblo-Indianer, Eine
historish-ethnographische Studie. Nova Acta Kaiserl. Leop. Carol.
Deutschen Akademie der Naturforschern. Vol. 87, No. 1, 1907.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_5" href="#FNanchor_5" class="label">[5]</a> The specialized symbolism so elaborately shown on Sikyatki
pottery is regarded as a local development and for that reason can not
be expected elsewhere even in the ancestral homes of the clans whose
later members lived at Hopi.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_6" href="#FNanchor_6" class="label">[6]</a> The Prehistoric Ruins of the San Juan Watershed in Utah,
Arizona, Colorado and New Mexico. Amer. Anthropologist, N. S. Vol. 5,
p. 280.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_7" href="#FNanchor_7" class="label">[7]</a> This ruin has been added to the National Monument known as
the Chaco group.
<p>The name Kin-a-a seems to have been applied by the Navaho to at least
two ruins. This particular Kin-a-a is possibly the ruin described by
Chas. F. Lummis to which Bandelier refers.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_8" href="#FNanchor_8" class="label">[8]</a> A Prehistoric Mesa Verde Pueblo and its People,
Smithsonian Report for 1916.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_9" href="#FNanchor_9" class="label">[9]</a> At certain times in Hopi ceremonies a thin layer of sand
is sprinkled over the kiva roof, and on this sand are drawn in meal
four rain-cloud figures, around which are performed certain secret
rites.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_10" href="#FNanchor_10" class="label">[10]</a> A two or three storied kiva like that of the Crown Point
ruin is mentioned by Jackson in his description of Chettro Kettle ruin
of the Chaco group, and is one of those features possibly existing in
the tower kivas which are now extinct.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_11" href="#FNanchor_11" class="label">[11]</a> Although the author has observed several towers with
fallen rock about their bases, he has not been able to trace three
concentric walls with connecting partitions.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_12" href="#FNanchor_12" class="label">[12]</a>
The circular kivas of the two ruins near Crown Point
are enclosed by four standing walls forming sides of a rectangle, a
feature they share with some of these chambers in the Chaco and San
Juan region. The intention of the builders was to secure the prescribed
subterranean feature by construction of a rectangular building about
the circular room rather than by depression below the level of the
site. This type is now extinct, but belongs to the most advanced stage
of pueblo architecture before its decline.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_13" href="#FNanchor_13" class="label">[13]</a> The Navaho are not a pottery making people, but often use
bowls and vases they find in prehistoric ruins.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_14" href="#FNanchor_14" class="label">[14]</a> Although prehistoric, the author regards all the Chaco
Canyon group of ruins as later in construction than those of the Mesa
Verde and San Juan, with which they are morphologically connected.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_15" href="#FNanchor_15" class="label">[15]</a> 4th Ann. Rep. of the Director of the Bur. Amer. Ethnol.;
also 22d Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., pp. 124, 125.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_16" href="#FNanchor_16" class="label">[16]</a> This account is taken from a report of an Exploring
Expedition from Santa Fé, New Mexico, in 1859, under command of Capt.
Macomb; published in 1876 by the Engineers Department, U. S. A.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_17" href="#FNanchor_17" class="label">[17]</a> Prehistoric Man in Utah. The Archæologist, Nov., 1894,
pp. 335–342.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_18" href="#FNanchor_18" class="label">[18]</a> We have in Hill Canyon ruins a good illustration of an
all but universal custom, among prehistoric people, of dual types of
rooms, one ceremonial, the other domiciliary, each constructed on
different architectural lines.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_19" href="#FNanchor_19" class="label">[19]</a> 28th Annual Report, Bureau of American Ethnology, pp.
198, 199.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_20" href="#FNanchor_20" class="label">[20]</a> A complete discussion of these prehistoric towers would
lead to a morphological comparison with the Chulpas of Peru, the
Nauregs of Sardinia, Irish and other similar religious structures.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_21" href="#FNanchor_21" class="label">[21]</a> A more extended discussion of towers is reserved for
a monograph, now in preparation, on “Prehistoric Towers of the
Southwest.” The author has made several new observations on these
structures some of which differ considerably from those of his
predecessors.
<p>Morgan, “Houses and House Life of the American Aborigines” (Contr. to
Amer. Ethnol., Vol. IV), has pointed out, page 191, that the round
tower at the base of Ute Mountain must have been entered through
the roof, as no lateral doorways were visible, and Montgomery’s
observations on towers in Nine Mile Canyon point the same way.
These facts tell in favor of the theory that towers and kivas are
morphologically identical, as Morgan indicates. An absence of pilasters
on the inner walls of towers indicates that the roof was not vaulted,
as in most Mesa Verde cliff dwellings and in the pueblo, Far View
House, of the Mummy Lake group. Towers belong to what I have designated
the second type of kivas, or those with flat roofs, and are less
abundant in the San Juan area.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_22" href="#FNanchor_22" class="label">[22]</a> <i>Op. cit.</i>, also, The Circular Kiva of Small Ruins
in the San Juan Watershed. Amer. Anthr. Jan.–March, 1914.
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<a id="Footnote_23" href="#FNanchor_23" class="label">[23]</a> The intra-rectangular kivas of such pueblos as Zuñi
are comparatively modern, but their position is explained in a
very different way from that of the intra-mural circular kivas
characteristic of the ruins of the San Juan.
</div>
<figure class="figcenter illowp20 mt5">
<img class="w100" src="images/logo.jpg" alt="torch logo">
</figure>
<div class="transnote mt5">
<div class="large center"><b>Transcriber’s Notes:</b></div>
<ul class="spaced small">
<li>Blank pages have been removed.</li>
<li>Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 70751 ***</div>
</html>
|
