diff options
| author | nfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org> | 2025-01-25 01:27:10 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | nfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org> | 2025-01-25 01:27:10 -0800 |
| commit | 3847c5c9cb73d3a4a03c441c4f291fde14c14396 (patch) | |
| tree | fa908f7ee81e49d76054f14eb480a173c114b516 /old/69170-0.txt | |
| parent | 370a2dcf149ce23d3ad550bf9f750252524b73c4 (diff) | |
Diffstat (limited to 'old/69170-0.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | old/69170-0.txt | 3237 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 3237 deletions
diff --git a/old/69170-0.txt b/old/69170-0.txt deleted file mode 100644 index 42def7f..0000000 --- a/old/69170-0.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3237 +0,0 @@ -The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Essenes, by Christian David -Ginsburg - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and -most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions -whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms -of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at -www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you -will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before -using this eBook. - -Title: The Essenes - Their history and doctrines - -Author: Christian David Ginsburg - -Release Date: October 16, 2022 [eBook #69170] - -Language: English - -Produced by: Jeroen Hellingman and the Online Distributed Proofreading - Team at https://www.pgdp.net/ for Project Gutenberg (This - file was produced from images generously made available by - The Internet Archive/American Libraries.) - -*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE ESSENES *** - - - - - - THE ESSENES: - THEIR HISTORY AND DOCTRINES. - - AN ESSAY, - REPRINTED FROM THE TRANSACTIONS - OF THE LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL - SOCIETY OF LIVERPOOL. - - - BY - CHRISTIAN D. GINSBURG, LL.D. - - - ἑν παντὶ ἔθνει ὁ φοβούμενος αὐτὸν - καὶ ἐργαζόμενος δικαιοσύνην δεκτὸς αὐτῷ ἐστιν - - Acts X, 35. - - - LONDON: - LONGMAN, GREEN, LONGMAN, ROBERTS, AND GREEN. - 1864. - - - - - - - - -THE ESSENES. - - -I. - - -It is very surprising that the Essenes, whose exemplary Virtues -elicited the unbounded admiration of even the Greeks and Romans, and -whose doctrines and practices contributed so materially to the spread -of Christianity, should be so little known among intelligent -Christians. The current information upon this remarkable sect or order -of Judaism, to be found in ecclesiastical histories and Cyclopædias, is -derived from the short notices of Philo, Pliny, Josephus, Solinus, -Porphyry, Eusebius, and Epiphanius. These seven witnesses—of whom the -first and third are Jewish philosophers, the second, fourth and fifth -heathen writers, and the last two Christian church historians—are all -who, till within a very recent period, have been subpœnaed before the -tribunal of public opinion, to give evidence as to the character of -these very much misunderstood and neglected Essenes. - -Not only is this combined testimony insufficient, but it is too much -tainted with the peculiar dogmas of the respective witnesses, to -furnish the general reader with an unbiassed notion of the character -and doctrines of this ancient sect. Philo and Josephus, writing in -Greek and in apology for their Jewish brethren, were too anxious to -represent to the Greeks and Romans every phase and sect of Judaism, as -corresponding to the different systems of Greek and Roman philosophy; -Pliny, Solinus, and Porphyry, again, betray too great an ignorance of -the inward workings of the Jewish religion, and too much prejudice -against the Jews; whilst Epiphanius draws upon his imagination, and -Eusebius simply copies the account of Philo, with the well-known -patristic pen. Nor can the modern descriptions of the Essenes, as given -in the histories of the church and in the popular Cyclopædias, be -always relied upon when they profess to give the results of the -aforementioned garbled scraps of ancient information; since the writers -are either too much afraid of, or too much pleased with, the marked -resemblance between some of the doctrines and practices of Christianity -and Essenism. Hence those who style themselves the true evangelical -Christians are very anxious to destroy every appearance of affinity -between Essenism and Christianity, lest it should be said that the one -gave rise to the other; whilst those who are termed Rationalists -multiply and magnify every feature of resemblance, in order to show -that Christianity is nothing but a development of Essenism—so that the -poor Essenes are crucified between the two. - -The design of this essay is to give an impartial statement of the -doctrines and practices of the Essenes; to show their rise and -progress, their relationship both to Judaism and Christianity, their -numbers and localities, to trace the most probable signification of -their name, &c., &c. To do this, I not only appeal to the seven -stereotyped witnesses, but to the information upon this subject -scattered throughout the Midrashim and the Talmud. But not to incur the -charge of partiality, as well as to enable you to test my conclusions, -I have collected all that the ancients have written upon this subject, -and append to this paper the whole account which Philo, Pliny, -Josephus, Solinus, Porphyry, Eusebius, and Epiphanius give of the -Essenes. - -The cardinal doctrines and practices of this sect are as follows:—They -regarded the inspired Law of God with the utmost veneration. In fact, -their adhesion to it was such that they were led thereby to pay the -greatest homage to Moses, the lawgiver, and to visit with capital -punishment any one of the brotherhood who blasphemed his name. The -highest aim of their life was to become the temples of the Holy Ghost, -when they could prophesy, perform miraculous cures, and, like Elias, be -the forerunners of the Messiah. This they regarded as the last stage of -perfection, which could only be reached by gradual growth in holiness, -brought about through strictly observing the commandments and the -Levitical laws of purity contained in the Pentateuch, mortifying the -flesh and the lusts thereof, and being meek and lowly in spirit, -inasmuch as this would bring them into closer communion with him who is -the Holy One of Israel. This earnest desire to avoid everything which -involved profanity in the slightest degree and which might interpose -between them and the Deity, made them abstain from using oaths, because -they regarded the invocation, in swearing, of heaven or the heavenly -throne, or anything which represents God’s glory, as a desecration. -Their communication was yea, yea; nay, nay; whatsoever was more than -these came of evil. - -Their increased strictness in enforcing the observance of the rigid -Mosaic Jaws of Levitical purity, which were afterwards amplified and -rendered still more rigid by traditional explanations, [1] ultimately -compelled the Essenes to withdraw themselves altogether from the -society of their Jewish brethren, to form a separate community, and to -live apart from the world, since contact with any one who did not -practice these laws, or with anything belonging to such an one, -rendered them impure. This fear of coming in contact with that which is -impure, as well as the desire not to be hindered in their spiritual -communion with their Creator, also made the Essenes abstain from -marriage; inasmuch as women, according to the law, are subject to -perpetual pollutions in menstruum and child-birth (compare Lev. xii, -1–8; xv, 19–31), and as going to one’s wife, even under ordinary -circumstances, is regarded as defiling (vide infra, p. 39, note 19). -There were, however, some weak brethren who could not be like the -angels in heaven, neither marrying nor being given in marriage; these -were allowed to take wives, but they could never advance to the highest -orders of the brotherhood, and had, moreover, to observe laws specially -enacted for married brethren and sisters. - -Here, in their separation from the Jewish nation, whatever any one of -them possessed was deposited in the general treasury, from which the -wants of the whole community alike were supplied by stewards appointed -by the whole brotherhood; so that they had all things in common. There -were no distinctions amongst them, such as rich and poor, masters and -servants; they called no one master upon earth, but all ministered to -the wants of one another. They lived peaceably with all men, reprobated -slavery and war, and would not even manufacture any martial instruments -whatever, however great the temptation or the fear might be. They were -governed by a president, who was elected by the whole body, and who -also acted as the judge of the community. Trials were conducted by -juries, composed, not as our juries are, of twelve persons, but of the -majority of the community, or of at least a hundred members, who had to -be unanimous in their verdict. The brother who was found guilty of -walking disorderly was excommunicated, yet was he not regarded as an -enemy, but was admonished as a brother, and received back after due -repentance. - -As it was contrary to the laws of Levitical purity to buy anything from -one who did not practice those laws, the Essenes had to raise the -supplies of all their wants among themselves. In this they experienced -no difficulty, as their food and raiment were most simple and very -self-denying, and as each one of the community willingly took his share -of work in the department in which he most excelled. Some were engaged -in tilling the ground, some in tending flocks and rearing bees, some in -preparing food, some in making the articles of dress, some in healing -the sick, and some in instructing the young; whilst all of them devoted -certain hours to studying the mysteries of nature and revelation and of -the celestial hierarchy. They always got up before the sun rose, and -never talked about any worldly matters till they had all assembled -together and, with their faces turned towards the sun, offered up their -national hymn of praise (המאיר לארץ) for the renewal of the light of -the day. This done, every one betook himself to his work, according to -the directions of the overseers, and remained at it till the fifth hour -(or eleven o’clock, a.m.), when the labour of the forenoon regularly -terminated. All of them again assembled together, had a baptism in cold -water, put on their white garments, the symbol of purity, and then made -their way to the refectory, which they entered with as much solemnity -as if it were the temple. The meal was a common one; and each member -took his seat according to the order of age. Those of the brethren who -were the bakers and cooks then placed before each one a little loaf of -bread and a dish of the most simple food, consisting chiefly of -vegetables as they ate very little animal flesh, and the repast -commenced after the priest had invoked God’s blessing upon it. A -mysterious silence was observed during the meal, which had the -character of a sacrament, and may have been designed as a substitute -for the sacrifices which they refused to offer in the temple. The -priest concluded it by offering thanks to the Bountiful Supplier of all -our wants, which was the signal of dismissal. Hereupon all withdrew, -put off their white and sacred garments, and dressed themselves in -their working clothes, resumed their several employments which they had -to do according to the directions of the overseers till the evening, -when they assembled again to partake of a common meal. But though every -thing was done under the directions of the overseers, and the Essenes -had even to receive their presents through the stewards, yet in two -things they were at perfect liberty to act as they pleased, viz., they -could relieve the distressed with as much money as they thought proper, -and manifest their compassion for those who were not of the brotherhood -as much as they liked, and whenever they liked. Such was their manner -of life during the week days. - -The Sabbath they observed with the utmost rigour, and regarded even the -removal of a vessel as labour, and a desecration of this holy day. On -this day they took special care not to be guilty of forsaking the -assembling of themselves together, as the manner of some is. Ten -persons constituted a complete and legal number for divine worship in -the synagogue, and in the presence of such an assembly an Essene would -never spit, nor would he at any time spit to his right hand. In the -synagogue, as at meals, each one took his seat according to age, in -becoming attire. They had no ordained ministers, whose exclusive right -it was to conduct the service; any one that liked took up the Bible and -read it, whilst another, who had much experience in spiritual matters, -expounded what was read. The distinctive ordinances of the brotherhood, -as well as the mysteries connected with the Tetragrammaton and the -angelic worlds were the prominent topics of Sabbatic instruction. Every -investigation into the causes of the phenomena both of mind and matter -was strictly forbidden, because the study of logic and metaphysics was -regarded as injurious to a devotional life. - -Celibacy being the rule of Essenism, the ranks of the brotherhood had -to be filled up by recruits from the Jewish community at large. They -preferred taking children, whom they educated most carefully and taught -the practices of the order, believing that of such the kingdom of -heaven is best made up. Every grown-up candidate (ὁ ζηλῶν) had to pass -through a noviciate of two stages, which extended over three years, -before he could be finally admitted into the order. Upon entering the -first stage, which lasted twelve months, the novice (νεοσύστατος) had -to cast all his possessions into the common treasury. He then received -a copy of the regulations of the brotherhood (δίαιταν τοῦ τάγματος), as -well as a spade (σκαλίς ἁξινάριον = יתד), to bury the excrement, -(comp. Deut. xxiii, 12–14,) an apron (περίζωμα = זריז), used at the -lustrations, and a white robe (λευκὴν ἐσθῆτα = בגד לבן) to put on at -meals, being the symbols of purity. During the whole of this period he -was an outsider, and was not admitted to the common meals, yet he had -to observe some of the ascetic rules of the Society. If, at the close -of this stage, the community found that he had properly acquitted -himself during the probationary year, the novice was admitted into the -second stage, which lasted two years, and was called an approacher -(προσίων ἔγγιον). During the period which lasted two years he was -admitted to a closer fellowship with the brotherhood, and shared in -their lustral rites (καθαρωτέρων πρὸς τῶν ἁγνείαν ὑδάτων μεταλαμβάνει), -but was still not admitted to the common meals (εἰς τὰς συμβιώσεις), -nor to any office. If he passed satisfactorily through the second stage -of probation, the approacher became an associate, or a full member of -the society (ὁμιλητὴς, ὃς εἰς τὸν ὅμιλον ἐγκρίνεται = חבר), when he -was received into the brotherhood and partook of the common meal -(συμβιωτὴς). - -Before, however, he was made a homiletes, or finally admitted into -close fellowship, he had to bind himself by a most solemn oath (this -being the only occasion on which the Essenes used an oath) to observe -three things. 1. Love to God. 2. Merciful justice towards all men; -especially to honor nobody as master, to avoid the wicked, to help the -righteous, to be faithful to every man, and especially to rulers (τοῖς -κρατοῦσιν), for without God no one comes to be ruler. And 3. Purity of -character, which implied humility, love of truth, hatred of falsehood, -strict secrecy towards outsiders, so as not to divulge the secret -doctrines (μυστήρια) to any one, and perfect openness with the members -of the order, and, finally, carefully to preserve the books belonging -to their sect (τὰ τῆς αἱρέσεως αὐτῶν βιβλία), and the names of the -angels (τὰ τῶν ἀγγέλων ὀνόματα) or the mysteries connected with the -Tetragrammaton (שם המפורש) and the other names of God and the angels, -comprised in the theosophy (מעשה מרכבה) as well as with the cosmogony -(מעשה בראשית) which also played so important a part among the Jewish -mystics and the Kabbalists. - -The three sections consisting of candidate (ὁ ζηλῶν), approacher -(περουσιῶν ἔγγιον), and associate (ὁμιλητὴς, ὃς εἰς τὸν ὅμιλον -ἐγκρίνεται), were subdivided into four orders, distinguished from each -other by superior holiness. So marked and serious were these -distinctions, that if one belonging to a higher degree of purity -touched one who belonged to a lower order, i.e., if one of the fourth -or highest order came in contact with one of the third or lower order, -or if one of the third touched one of the second order, or if one of -the second order touched one of the first or lowest order, he -immediately became impure, and could only regain his purity by -lustrations. From the beginning of the noviciate to the achievement of -the highest spiritual state, there were eight different stages which -marked the gradual growth in holiness. Thus, after being accepted as a -novice and obtaining the apron (זריז—περίζωμα) the symbol of purity, -he attained (1) to the state of outward or bodily purity by baptisms -(זריזות מביאה לידי נקיות). From this state of bodily purity he -progressed (2) to that stage which imposed abstinence from connubial -intercourse (נקיות מביאה לידי פרישות), or to that degree of holiness, -which enabled him to practise celibacy. Having succeeded in mortifying -the flesh in this respect, he advanced (3) to the stage of inward or -spiritual purity (פרישות מביאה לידי טהרה). From this stage again he -advanced (4) to that which required the banishing of all anger and -malice, and the cultivation of a meek and lowly spirit (טהרה מביאה -לידי ענוה). This led him (5) to the culminating point of holiness -(ענוה מביאה לידי הסידות). Upon this summit of holiness he became (6) -the temple of the Holy Spirit, and could prophesy (חסידות מביה לידי -רה״ק). Thence again he advanced (7) to that stage in which he was -enabled to perform miraculous cures, and raise the dead (רוח הקדש לידי -תחה״מ). And finally, he attained (8) to the position of Elias the -forerunner of the Messiah (תחה״מ לידי אליהו). - -The earnestness and determination of these Essenes to advance to the -highest state of holiness were seen in their self-denying and godly -life; and it may fairly be questioned whether any religious system has -ever produced such a community of saints. Their absolute confidence in -God and resignation to the dealings of Providence; their uniformly holy -and unselfish life; their unbounded love of virtue, and utter contempt -for worldly fame, riches or pleasure; their industry, temperance, -modesty and simplicity of life; their contentment of mind and -cheerfulness of temper; their love of order, and abhorrence of even the -semblance of falsehood; their benevolence and philanthropy; their love -for the brethren, and their following peace with all men; their hatred -of slavery and war; their tender regard for children, and reverence and -anxious care for the aged; their attendance on the sick, and readiness -to relieve the distressed; their humility and magnanimity; their -firmness of character and power to subdue their passions; their heroic -endurance under the most agonizing sufferings for righteousness’ sake; -and their cheerfully looking forward to death, as releasing their -immortal souls from the bonds of the body to be for ever in a state of -bliss with their Creator—have hardly found a parallel in the history of -mankind. No wonder that Jews, of different sects, Greeks and Romans, -Christian church historians, and heathen writers have been alike -constrained to lavish the most unqualified praise on this holy -brotherhood. It seems that the Saviour of the world, who illustrated -simplicity and innocence of character by the little child which he took -up in his arms, also showed what is required for a holy life in the -Sermon on the Mount by a description of the Essenes. So remarkably does -this brotherhood exemplify the lessons which Christ propounds in Matth. -chap v., &c. - -This leads us to consider the question about the origin of this -brotherhood, and their relationship to Judaism and Christianity. The -assertion of Josephus that they “live the same kind of life which among -the Greeks has been ordered by Pythagoras” (vide infra, p. 226, § 4,) -has led some writers to believe that Essenism is the offspring of -Pythagorism. The most able champion for this view is Zeller, the author -of the celebrated History of Philosophy. He maintains [2] “that -Essenism, at least as we know it from Philo and Josephus, has, in its -essence, originated under Greek and especially under Pythagorean -influences,” and tries to support his conclusion by the following -summary of the supposed resemblances between Neo-Pythagorism and -Essenism. (1) “Both strive to attain to superior holiness by an ascetic -life. (2) Both repudiate animal sacrifices, the eating of animal food, -wine and marriage. (3) Both of them are, however, not quite agreed -among themselves about the latter point; for on both sides there are -some who recommend marriage, but restrict connubial intercourse to -procreation. (4) Moreover, both demand simplicity of life. (5) Both -refrain from warm baths. (6) Both wear white garments, especially at -dinner time. (7) Both lay the greatest value upon their purification -and eschew everything unclean. (8) Both prohibit oaths, because a pious -man does not require them. (9) Both find their social ideal in -institutions which it is true were only realized by the Essenes, and in -living together with perfect community of goods and unconditional -subordination of individuals to their overseers. (10) Both insist on -strict secresy about their schools. (11) Both like symbolic -representations of their doctrines. (12) Both support themselves on an -allegorical interpretation of ancient traditions, whose authority they -recognise (13) Both worship higher powers in the elements, and pray to -the rising sun. (14) Both seek to keep everything unclean from their -sight, and for this reason have peculiar prescriptions about the -discharge of the duties of nature. (15) Both cultivate the belief in -intermediate beings between the supreme Deity and the world. (16) Both -devote themselves to magic arts. (17) Both regard above all things the -gift of prophesy as the highest fruit of wisdom and piety, and both -boast to possess this gift in their most distinguished members. (18) -Finally, Both corroborate their peculiar mode of life with a dualistic -view of the relation of the spirit and matter, good and evil. (19) Both -agree especially in their notions about the origin of the soul, its -relationship to the body, and about a future life, only the doctrine of -transmigration of souls seems not to have been known among the Essenes” -[3] - -Striking as these resemblances may appear, it will be seen on a closer -examination that some of the points which constitute this comparison do -not exist in Essenism, that others are either due to the coloring of -Josephus or have their origin in Judaism, that the difference between -Pythagorism and Essenism are far more numerous and vital than the -parallels, and that Zeller’s conclusion is therefore not warranted. I -shall examine these points seriatim. - -(1) Asceticism is not foreign to Judaism. We meet with individuals who -voluntarily imposed upon themselves ascetic life to be able, as they -thought, to give themselves more entirely to the service of God by -mortifying the lusts of the flesh, at a very early period of Biblical -history; and we need only to refer to the regulations about Nazarites -(Numb. vi. 1–21), to the case of Manoah and his wife (Judg. xiii.), to -the life of Elijah (1 Kings xviii.–xix.) to the practices of the -Rechabites throughout the Scriptures, of persons abstaining from the -good things of this world, to see how the Essenes, without (Jer. xxxv. -2, &c.), and to the numerous instances which occur copying the -Pythagoreans or any other heathen fraternity, would naturally conclude -that asceticism is conducive to a devotional life. (2) As to the -repudiation of animal sacrifice, animal food, wine, &c, to which Zeller -refers in the second point of comparison, I submit that the Essenes did -not repudiate animal sacrifices, but that they could not offer them on -account of the different view which they had about holiness, as -Josephus most distinctly declares (vide infra p. 52), that neither -Philo nor Josephus says a word about their objecting to eat animal -flesh or drink wine, and that their celibacy arose from an extension of -a law contained in the Pentateuch. Besides, it is not quite so certain -that the Pythagoreans did not offer animal sacrifices; Diogenes -Laertius and others positively state that Pythagoras himself sacrificed -a hecatomb upon his discovering what is called the Pythagoric theorem, -i.e. that, in a right angled triangle, the square of the hypothenuse is -equal to the sum of the squares of the sides. [4] (4) The fourth -comparison about simplicity of life is involved in the first. (5) The -statement in the fifth comparison, that the Essenes refrain from warm -baths, is purely imaginary; (6, 7) whilst the white garments and the -purifications mentioned in the sixth and seventh parallels are strictly -Jewish and Biblical. As symbolic of purity the priests were required to -clothe themselves in white linen (Exod. xxviii. 39–42; Levit. vi. 10; -xvi. 4), and the saints in heaven, washed and cleansed from all -impurity, are to be clad in white garments (4 Esdras ii. 39–45; Enoch -lxi. 18; Rev. iii. 4; vi. 11; vii. 9, 14; xix. 8); soiled garments are -regarded as emblematic of impurity (Zech. iii. 3, &c.) Inseparably -connected therewith are the frequent purifications or washings enjoined -on the priests before entering into the presence of God to perform -religious acts (Levit. xvi. 4; 2 Chron. xxx. 19), and on the people -generally after coming in contact with anything impure (Levit. xi. 25, -40; xv. 5–24). The white garments and the frequent purifications of the -Essenes, who strove to live after the highest degree of Levitical -purity, were therefore in perfect harmony with exaggerated Judaism. (8) -As to the assertion in comparison 8 that the Pythagoreans prohibited -oaths, it is well known that they did use oaths on important occasions, -and that they held it to be most sacred to swear by the number four, -which they represented by ten dots in the form of a triangle, so that -each side consisted of four dots, as follows:— - - - • - • • - • • • - • • • • - - -The community of goods, the secresy about their institutions, the -symbolic representation of their doctrines, &c., mentioned in -comparisons 9, 10, 11, 12, are the natural result of their manner of -life. (13) That they worshipped the sun is not borne out by fact, (14) -whilst their peculiar manner in performing the functions of nature is -in accordance with the injunction of Scripture (Deut. xxiii. 13, 15), -which the Essenes, as the spiritual host of the Lord, applied to -themselves. (15) As to their very peculiar belief in intermediate -beings between the Deity and the world, mentioned in the fifteenth -point of comparison, I can only say that Philo and Josephus say nothing -about it. (16) Their devotedness to the study of the magic arts was -restricted to miraculous cures, and was not peculiar to them; since -tradition had made Solomon the author of books on magical cures and -exorcisms, and Josephus tells us (vide infra, p. 44, note 35) that he -had seen other Jews performing these magic cures. (17) Neither is there -anything foreign in the opinion, that the power to foretel future -events can only be obtained by leading a life of preeminent holiness, -for this was the common belief of the Jews, though it is true that the -Essenes were the only section of the Jewish community who as a body -strove to obtain the gift of prophecy. It, however, must not be -forgotten that others too laid claim to this gift. Josephus tells us -that when brought as prisoner of war before Vespasian, he addressed the -Roman general as follows:—“Thou, Vespasian thinkest that thou hast -simply a prisoner of war in me, but I appear before thee as a prophet -of important future events. If I had not to deliver to thee a message -from God, I would have known what the Jewish law demands, and how a -general ought to die. Dost thou want to send me to Nero? For what? Will -his successors, who ascend the throne before thee, reign long on it? -No! thou, Vespasian, wilt be emperor and autocrat—thou, and this thy -son.” (Jewish War, iii. 8, § 9). This prophecy of Josephus is also -recorded by the celebrated Roman historian Dion Cassius who says: -“Josephus, a Jew, was taken prisoner by him (i.e. Vespasian), and put -in chains; but he smilingly addressed him: ‘Thou puttest me now in -chains, but thou wilt loose them again, after twelve months, as -emperor’” (lib. lxvi. c. 1); and by Tacitus (lib. v. c. 13). What -Zeller says in comparisons 18 and 19 about their dualistic view of the -relationship of spirit and matter, good and evil, and their notions of -the origin of the soul, is entirely owing to Josephus’ colouring of the -subject, as may be seen from the notes on the extracts from this -historian in the second part of this Essay. - -Having thus shown that the parallels between Pythagorism and Essenism -are more imaginary than real, and that the few things which might be -considered as being analogous are unimportant, and are such as will -naturally develop themselves among any number of enlightened men who -devote themselves almost exclusively to a contemplative religious life, -I shall now point out some of the vital differences between the two -brotherhoods. 1. The Pythagoreans were essentially polytheists; the -Essenes were real monotheistic Jews, worshippers of the Holy One of -Israel. 2. The Pythagoreans clustered round Pythagoras as the centre of -their spiritual and intellectual life, and estimated the degree of -perfection of any of the members by the degree of intimacy which he -enjoyed with Pythagoras: the Essenes regarded the inspired Scriptures -as their sole source of spiritual life, and called no man master on -earth, every one having the same right to teach, and being alike -eligible for all the offices in the commonwealth. 3. The Pythagoreans -favored matrimony, and we are told that Pythagoras himself had a wife -and children; whilst celibacy was the rule of Essenism, marriage being -the exception. 4. The Pythagoreans believed in the doctrine of -metempsychosis, which led them to abstain from eating animal flesh, -because human souls migrated into animals, and made Pythagoras once -intercede in behalf of a dog that was being beaten, because he -recognised in its cries the voice of a departed friend: the Essenes -believed no such thing. 5. Scientific studies, such as mathematics, -astronomy, music, &c, formed an essential part of the Pythagorean -system: Essenism strictly forbade these studies as injurious to a -devotional life. 6. Pythagorism was occupied with instigating the -problems of the origin and constitution of the universe: Essenism -regarded such inquiries as impious, and most implicitly looked upon God -as the creator of all things. 7. Pythagorism taught that man can -control his fortune and overrule his circumstances: Essenism maintained -that fate governs all things, and that nothing can befal man contrary -to its determination and will. 8. Pythagorism enjoined ointment to be -used by its followers: the Essenes regarded it as defilement 9. The -Pythagoreans had a sovereign contempt for all those who did not belong -to their ranks: the Essenes were most exemplary in their charity -towards all men, and in their unbounded kindness to those who were not -of the brotherhood. 10. The Pythagoreans were an aristocratical and -exclusive club, and excited the jealousy and hatred not only of the -democratical party in Crotona, but also of a considerable number of the -opposite faction, so much so that it speedily led to their destruction: -the Essenes were meek and lowly in spirit, and were so much beloved by -those who belonged to different sects, that Pharisees and Sadducees, -Greeks and Romans, Jews and Gentiles, joined in lavishing the highest -praise upon them. [5] - -As to the relationship which Essenism bears to Judaism, the very fact -that the Essenes, like the other Jews, professed to he guided by the -teachings of the Bible, and that a rupture between them and the Jewish -community at large is nowhere mentioned, but that on the contrary they -are always spoken of in the highest terms of commendation, would of -itself be sufficient to prove it. In doctrine, as well as in practice, -the Essenes and the Pharisees were nearly alike. Both had four classes -of Levitical purity, which were so marked that one who lived according -to the higher degree of purity, became impure by touching one who -practised a lower degree, and could only regain his purity by -lustration. Both subjected every applicant for membership to a -noviciate of twelve months. Both gave their novices an apron in the -first year of their probation. Both refused to propound the mysteries -of the cosmogony and cosmology to any one except to members of the -society. Both had stewards in every place where they resided to supply -the needy strangers of their order with articles of clothing and food. -Both regarded office as coming from God. Both looked upon their meal as -a sacrament. Both bathed before sitting down to the meal. Both wore a -symbolic garment on the lower part of the body whilst bathing. Amongst -both the priest began and concluded the meal with prayer. Both regarded -ten persons as constituting a complete number for divine worship, and -held the assembly of such a number as sacred. Amongst both of them none -would spit to the right hand in the presence of such an assembly. Both -washed after performing the functions of nature. Both would not remove -a vessel on the Sabbath. And both abstained from using oaths, though it -is true that the Essenes alone uniformly observed it as a sacred -principle. The differences between the Essenes and the Pharisees are -such as would naturally develope themselves in the course of time from -the extreme rigour with which the former sought to practise the -Levitical laws of purity. As contact with any one or with anything -belonging to any one who did not live according to the same degree of -purity, rendered them impure according to the strict application of -their laws, the Essenes were in the first place obliged to withdraw -from intercourse with their other Jewish brethren, and form themselves -into a separate brotherhood. Accordingly the first difference between -them and the others was that they formed an isolated order. The second -point of difference was on marriage. The Pharisees regarded marriage as -a most sacred institution, and laid it down as a rule that every man is -to take a wife at the age of eighteen (Comp. Aboth v. 21), whilst the -Essenes were celibates, which, as we have seen before, also arose from -their anxiety to avoid defilement. Hence the declaration in Aboth d. R. -Nathan—“there are eight kinds of Pharisees; ... and those Pharisees who -live in celibacy are Essenes” (c. xxxvii.). [6] The third difference -which existed between them and the Pharisees, and which was also owing -to the rigorous application of the Levitical laws of purity, was that -they did not frequent the temple and would not offer sacrifices. And -fourthly, though they firmly believed in the immortality of the soul, -yet, unlike the Pharisees, they did not believe in the resurrection of -the body. - -The identity of many of the precepts and practices of Essenism and -Christianity is unquestionable. Essenism urged on its disciples to seek -first the kingdom of God and his righteousness: so Christ (Matt. vi. -33; Luke xii. 31). The Essenes forbade the laying up of treasures upon -earth: so Christ (Matt. vi. 19–21). The Essenes demanded of those who -wished to join them to sell all their possessions, and to divide it -among the poor brethren: so Christ (Matt. xix. 21; Luke xii. 33). The -Essenes had all things in common, and appointed one of the brethren as -steward to manage the common bag; so the primitive Christians (Acts ii. -44, 45; iv. 32–34; John xii. 6; xiii. 29). Essenism put all its members -on the same level, forbidding the exercise of authority of one over the -other, and enjoining mutual service; so Christ (Matt. xx. 25–28; Mark -ix. 35–37; x. 42–45). Essenism commanded its disciples to call no man -master upon the earth; so Christ (Matt. xxiii. 8–10). Essenism laid the -greatest stress on being meek and lowly in spirit; so Christ (Matt. v. -5; xi. 29). Christ commended the poor in spirit, those who hunger and -thirst after righteousness, the merciful, the pure in heart, and the -peacemakers; so the Essenes. Christ combined the healing of the body -with that of the soul; so the Essenes. Like the Essenes, Christ -declared that the power to cast out evil spirits, to perform miraculous -cures, &c., should be possessed by his disciples as signs of their -belief (Mark xvi. 17; comp. also Matt. x. 8; Luke ix. 1, 2; x. 9). Like -the Essenes, Christ commanded his disciples not to swear at all, but to -say yea, yea, and nay, nay. The manner in which Christ directed his -disciples to go on their journey (Matt. x. 9, 10) is the same which the -Essenes adopted when they started on a mission of mercy. The Essenes, -though repudiating offensive war, yet took weapons with them when they -went on a perilous journey; Christ enjoined his disciples to do the -same thing (Luke xxii. 36). Christ commended that elevated spiritual -life, which enables a man to abstain from marriage for the kingdom of -heaven’s sake, and which cannot be attained by all men save those to -whom it is given (Matt. xix. 10–12; comp. also 1 Cor. viii.); so the -Essenes who, as a body, in waiting for the kingdom of heaven (מלכות -השמים) abstained from connubial intercourse. The Essenes did not offer -animal sacrifices, but strove to present their bodies a living -sacrifice, holy and acceptable unto God, which they regarded as a -reasonable service; the Apostle Paul exhorts the Romans to do the same. -(Rom. xii. 1). It was the great aim of the Essenes to live such a life -of purity and holiness as to be the temples of the Holy Spirit, and to -be able to prophesy: the apostle Paul urges the Corinthians to covet to -prophesy (1 Cor. xiv. 1, 39). When Christ pronounced John to be Elias -(Matt. xi. 14), he declared that the Baptist had already attained to -that spirit and power which the Essenes strove to obtain in their -highest stage of purity. [7] It will therefore hardly be doubted that -our Saviour himself belonged to this holy brotherhood. This will -especially be apparent when we remember that the whole Jewish -community, at the advent of Christ, was divided into three parties, the -Pharisees, the Sadducees and the Essenes, and that every Jew had to -belong to one of these sects. Jesus who, in all things, conformed to -the Jewish law, and who was holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate -from sinners, would therefore naturally associate himself with that -order of Judaism which was most congenial to his holy nature. Moreover, -the fact that Christ, with the exception of once, was not heard of in -public till his thirtieth year, implying that he lived in seclusion -with this fraternity, and that though he frequently rebuked the -Scribes, Pharisees and Sadducees, he never denounced the Essenes, -strongly confirms this conclusion. There can be no difficulty in -admitting that the Saviour of the world, who taught us lessons from the -sparrows in the air, and the lilies in the field, and who made the -whole realm of nature tributary to his teachings, would commend divine -truth wherever it existed. But whilst Christ propounded some of the -everlasting truths which were to be found less adulterated and -practised more conscientiously among the Essenes than among the rest of -the people, he repudiated their extremes. They were ascetics; he ate -and drank the good things of God (Matt., xi. 19). They considered -themselves defiled by contact with any one who practised a lower degree -of holiness than their own; Christ associated with publicans and -sinners, to teach them the way to heaven. They sacrificed the lusts of -their flesh to gain spiritual happiness for themselves; Christ -sacrificed himself for the salvation of others. - -It is now impossible to ascertain the precise date when this order of -Judaism first developed itself. According to Philo, Moses himself -instituted this order; Josephus contents himself with saying that they -existed “ever since the ancient time of the fathers;” whilst Pliny -assures us that, without any one being born among them, the Essenes, -incredible to relate, “have prolonged their existence for thousands of -ages.” [8] Bating, however, these assertions, which are quite in -harmony with the well known ancient custom of ascribing some -pre-Adamite period to every religious or philosophical system, it must -already have become apparent, from the description of it, that the very -nature of the Essenes precludes the possibility of tracing its date. -The fact that the Essenes developed themselves gradually, and at first -imperceptibly, through intensifying the prevalent religious notions, -renders it impossible to say with exactness at what degree of intensity -they are to be considered as detached from the general body. The first -mention we have of their existence is in the days of Jonathan the -Maccabæan, B.C. 166. (Joseph. Antiq. xiii. 5, 8). We then hear of them -again in the reign of Aristobulus I., B.C. 106, in connection with a -prophecy about the death of Antigonus, uttered by Judas an Essene, of -which Josephus gives the following account. “Judas, an Essene, whose -predictions had up to this time never deceived, caused great -astonishment on this occasion. When he saw at that time Antigonus pass -through the temple, he called out to his disciples, of whom he had no -small number—‘Oh! it would be better for me to die now, since truth -died before me, and one of my prophecies has proved false. Antigonus, -who ought to have died this day, is alive; Strato’s Tower, which is six -hundred furlongs distance from here, is fixed for his murder, and it is -already the fourth hour of the day [ten o’clock]; time condemns the -prophecy as a falsehood.’ Having uttered these words, the aged man sunk -into a long, dejected, and sorrowing silence. Soon after, the report -came that Antigonus was murdered in the subterranean passage which, -like Cesarea on the sea side, was also called Strato’s Tower. It was -this circumstance that misled the prophet.” (Jewish War, i. 3, § 5; -Antiq. xiii. 11, § 2). The third mention of their existence we find in -the well known prophecy of the Essene Manahem, uttered to Herod when a -boy. [9] Now these accounts most unquestionably show that the Essenes -existed at least two centuries before the Christian era, and that they -at first lived amongst the Jewish community at large. Their residence -at Jerusalem is also evident from the fact that there was a gate named -after them (Ἐσσηνῶν πύλη Joseph. Jewish War, v. 4, § 2). When they -ultimately withdrew themselves from the rest of the Jewish nation, the -majority of them settled on the north-west shore of the Dead Sea, -sufficiently distant to escape its noxious exhalations, and the rest -lived in scattered communities throughout Palestine and Syria. Both -Philo and Josephus estimated them to be above four thousand in number. -This must have been exclusive of women and children. We hear very -little of them after this period (i.e. 40 A.D.); and there can hardly -be any doubt that, owing to the great similarity which existed between -their precepts and practices and those of the primitive Christians, the -Essenes as a body must have embraced Christianity. - -Having ascertained the character of the Essenes, we shall be better -prepared to investigate the origin of their name, which has been the -cause of so much controversy, and which was not known even to Philo and -Josephus. There is hardly an expression the etymology of which has -called forth such a diversity of opinion as this name has elicited. The -Greek and the Hebrew, the Syriac and the Chaldee, names of persons and -names of places, have successively been tortured to confess the secret -connected with this appellation, and there are no less, if not more, -than twenty different explanations of it, which I shall give in -chronological order. Philo tells us that some derived it from the Greek -homonym ὁσιότης holiness, because the Essenes were above all others -worshippers of God; but he rejects it as incorrect (vide infra, p. 32) -without giving us another derivation. 2. Josephus does not expressly -give any derivation of it, but simply says, “the third sect who really -seem to practise holiness (ὁ δὴ καὶ δοκεῖ σεμνότητα ἀσκεῖν) are called -Essenes.” (Vide infra p. 41). From the addition, however, “who really -seem to practise holiness or piety,” Frankel [10] argues that the word -must mean holiness or piety, because it appears to justify the name, -and hence concludes that Josephus most probably took it to be the -Hebrew חסידים or צנועים. Whilst Jost [11] is of opinion that -Josephus derived it from the Chaldee חשא to be silent, to be -mysterious, because חשן the high priest’s breast-plate, for which the -Septuagint has λογεῖον or λόγιον is translated by him ἐσσην, or that he -might have deduced this idea from חשן itself, and traced it to -λογεῖον or λόγιον as endowed with the gift of prophecy. [12] In Aboth -of R. Nathan [13] it is written עשאני from עשה to do, to perform, -and accordingly denotes the performers of the law. 4. Epiphanius again -calls them Ὀσσαῖοι and Ὀσσηνοι and tells us that it etymologically -signifies στιβαρὸν γένος the stout or strong race, evidently taking it -for חסין or עזים. 5. In another place Epiphanius affirms that the -Essenes borrowed their name from Jesse the father of David, or from -Jesus, whose doctrines he ascribes to them; explaining the name Jesus -to signify in Hebrew a physician; and calls them Jesseans. [14] In this -he is followed by Petitus who makes them so related to David that they -were obliged to take the name of his father Jesus or Jesse; [15] -although Jesus does not signify physician but God-help. 6. Suidas (Lex -s. v.) and Hilgenfeld (Die jüdische Apokal. p. 278), make it out to be -the form חזין = θεωρητικοί seers, and the latter maintains that this -name was given to them because they pretended to see visions and to -prophesy. 7. Josippon b. Gorion [16] (lib. iv. sects. 6, 7, p.p. 274 -and 278, ed. Breithaupt), and Gale (Court of the Gentiles, part ii., p. -147), take it for the Hebrew חסידים the pious, the puritans. 8. De -Rossi [17] (Meor Enaim, 82 a), Gfrörer (Philo, ii. p. 341), Herzfeld -(Geschichte d. V. Israel ii. p. 397), and others, insist that it is the -Aramaic אסיא = θεραπευτής physician, and that this name was given to -them because of the spiritual or physical cures they performed. Indeed, -De Rossi and Herzfeld will have it that the sect Baithusians ביתוסים -mentioned in the Talmud is nothing but a contraction of בית אסי the -school or sect of physicians, just as בית הילל stands for the school -of Hillel. 9. Salmasius affirms that the Essenes derived their name -from the town called Essa, situated beyond the Jordan, which is -mentioned by Josephus (Antiq. xiii. 15, § 2), or from the place Vadi -Ossis. [18] 10. Rappaport (Erech Milln, p. 41), says that it is the -Greek ἰσος an associate, a fellow of the fraternity. 11. Frankel -(Zeitschrift, 1846, p. 449, &c.), and others think that it is the -Hebrew expression צנועים the retired. 12. Ewald (Geschichte d. Volkes -Israel, iv. p. 420), is sure that it is the Rabbinic חזן servant (of -God), and that the name was given to them because it was their only -desire to be θεραπευταὶ θεοῦ. 13. Graetz (Geschichte der Juden iii. p. -468, second ed.) will have it that it is from the Aramaic סחא to -bathe, with Aleph prostheticum, and that it is the shorter form for -אסחאי צפרא = טובלי שחרית ἡμιερβαπτισταί hemerobaptists; the Greek -form Ἐσσαῖος, Ἐσσαῖοι being nothing but Assaï or Essaï with ח elided. -14. Dr. Löw (Ben Chananja vol. i. p. 352) never doubts but that they -were called Essenes after their founder, whose name he tells us was -ישי, the disciple of Rabbi Joshua ben Perachja. 15. Dr. Adler -(Volkslehrer, vi. p. 50), again submits that it is from the Hebrew -אסר to bind together, to associate, and that they were called אסרים -because they united together to keep the law. 16. Dr. Cohen suggests -the Chaldee root עשן to be strong, and that they were called עשיני -because of their strength of mind to endure sufferings and to subdue -their passions. (Comp. Frankel’s Monatschrift viii. p. 272). 17. -Oppenheim thinks that it may be the form עושין and stand for עושין -טהרת הקדש or עושין טהרת חטאת observers of the laws of purity and -holiness. (Ibid). 18. Jellinek (Ben Chananja iv. 374), again derives it -from the Hebrew חצן sinus, περίζωμα, alluding to the apron which the -Essenes wore; whilst, 19, Others again derived it from חסיא pious. -The two last-mentioned explanations seem to have much to recommend -them, they are natural and expressive of the characteristics of the -brotherhood. I, however, incline to prefer the last, because it plainly -connects the Essenes with an ancient Jewish brotherhood called -Chassidim חסידים the pious, who preceded the Essenes, and from whom -the latter took their rise. Those who wish to trace this connection, -will find an article on the Chassidim in Dr. Alexander’s edition of -Kitto’s Cyclopædia of Biblical Literature. - - - - - - - - -II. - - -I shall now give in chronological order the description of the Essenes -found in the writings of Philo, Pliny, Josephus, Solinus, Porphyry, -Eusebius and Epiphanius, and subjoin such notes as will explain the -difficulties, and show the historical value of the respective -documents. - -As Philo is the oldest in point of time, we will begin with him. The -exact date of the birth of this celebrated Jewish-Alexandrian -philosopher is not known. It is, however, generally agreed that he was -born in Alexandria between the years 20 and 1 B.C., and died about 60 -A.D. Having resided all his lifetime in Alexandria, his information -about the Essenes, who lived in Palestine, was derived from hearsay. -This will account for some of the inaccuracies in his description of -this remarkable brotherhood. He has given us two accounts of them, one -in his treatise, entitled Every Virtuous Man is Free, and the other in -his treatise, called Apology for the Jews. The latter is no longer -extant, but Eusebius has preserved the fragments which speak of the -Essenes in his work, entitled Præparatio Evangelica viii. 11. The -description of the so-called contemplative Essenes, or Therapeutæ, -which is generally appealed to as illustrating the doctrines and -practices of the brotherhood in question, has nothing whatever to do -with the real Palestinian Essenes; and it is almost certain that it is -one of the many apocryphal productions fathered upon Philo, as may be -seen from Graetz’s elaborate and masterly analysis of it. [19] Philo’s -first account is contained in his treatise entitled Every Virtuous Man -is Free, and is as follows: [20] - -“Palestine, and Syria too, which are inhabited by no slight portion of -the numerous population of the Jews, are not barren of virtue. There -are some among them called Essenes (Ἐσσαῖοι),—in number more than four -thousand,—from, as I think, an incorrect derivation from the Greek -homonym hosiotes, holiness (παρώνυμοι ὁσιότητος), because they are -above all others worshippers of God (θεραπευταὶ θεοῦ). They do not -sacrifice any animate, but rather endeavour to make their own minds fit -for holy offering (ἱεροπρεπεῖς διανοίας). [21] They, in the first -place, live in villages, avoiding cities on account of the habitual -wickedness of the citizens, being sensible that as disease is -contracted from breathing an impure atmosphere, so an incurable -impression is made on the soul in such evil company. [22] Some of them -cultivate the earth, others are engaged in those diverse arts which -promote peace, thus benefiting themselves and their neighbours. They do -not lay up treasures of gold or silver, [23] nor do they acquire large -portions of land out of a desire for revenues, but provide themselves -only with the absolute necessities of life. Although they are almost -the only persons of all mankind who are without wealth and -possessions—and this by their own choice rather than want of -success—yet they regard themselves as the richest, because they hold -that the supply of our wants, and contentment of mind, are riches, as -in truth they are. [24] - -“No maker of arrows, darts, spears, swords, helmets, breastplates, or -shields—no manufacturer of arms or engines of war, nor any man whatever -who makes things belonging to war, or even such things as might lead to -wickedness in times of peace, is to be found among them. [25] Traffic, -innkeeping, or navigation, they never so much as dream of, because they -repudiate every inducement to covetousness. There is not a single slave -to be found among them, for all are free, and mutually serve each -other. They condemn owners of slaves, not only as unjust, inasmuch as -they corrupt the principle of equality, but also as impious, because -they destroy the law of nature, which like a mother brought forth and -nourished all alike, and made them all legitimate brethren, not only in -word but in deed; but this relationship, treacherous covetousness, -rendered overbearing by success, has destroyed by engendering enmity -instead of cordiality, and hatred instead of love. - -“They leave the logical part of philosophy, as in no respect necessary -for the acquisition of virtue, to the word catchers; and the natural -part, as being too difficult for human nature, to the astrological -babblers, excepting that part of it which treats upon the existence of -God and the origin of the universe; [26] but the ethical part they -thoroughly work out themselves, using as their guides the laws which -their fathers inherited, and which it would have been impossible for -the human mind to devise without divine inspiration. Herein they -instruct themselves at all times, but more especially on the seventh -day. For the seventh day is held holy, on which they abstain from all -other work, and go to the sacred places called synagogues, sit -according to order, the younger below the elder, and listen with -becoming attention. Then one takes the Bible and reads it, and another -of those who have most experience comes forward and expounds it, -passing over that which is not generally known, for they philosophise -on most things in symbols according to the ancient zeal. - -“They are instructed in piety, holiness, righteousness, economy, -politics, in knowledge of what is truly good, bad and indifferent, to -choose things that are necessary, and to avoid the contrary. They use -therein a threefold rule and definition, viz.: love of God, love of -virtue, and love of mankind. [27] Of their love to God, they give -innumerable demonstrations—e.g. their constant and unalterable holiness -(ἁγνεία) throughout the whole of their life; their avoidance of oaths -[28] and falsehoods, and their firm belief that God is the source of -all good, but of nothing evil. Of their love of virtue they give proofs -in their contempt for money, fame, and pleasures, their continence, -endurance, in their satisfying their wants easily, simplicity, -cheerfulness of temper, modesty, order, firmness, and every thing of -the kind. As instances of their love to man, are to be mentioned, their -benevolence, equality, and their having all things in common, which is -beyond all description, and about which it will not be out of place to -speak here a little. - -“First then, no one has his own house, so that it also belongs to all. -For, besides that, they all live together in sodalities; it is also -open to those of the brotherhood who come from other places. Moreover, -they have all one common treasury and store of provisions, common -garments, and common food for all who eat together. Such a mode of -sleeping together, living together, and eating together, could not be -so easily established in fact among any other people; and indeed it -would be impossible. For whatever they receive daily, if they work for -wages, they do not retain it as their own, but give it to the common -stock, and let every one that likes make common use of it. [29] Those -that are sick are not neglected because they can earn nothing, but have -what is necessary for their aid from the common stock, so that they -ever fare richly without wanting anything. They manifest respect, -reverence and care for the aged, just as children do for their parents, -administering to them a thousand times with all plentifulness both with -their hands and their counsels in their old age. - -“Such champions of virtue does a philosophy produce which is free from -the subtlety of Greek word-splitting, and which deals with subjects -tending to the exercise of praiseworthy actions, and giving rise to -invincible freedom. This was seen in the fact that many tyrants have -arisen from time to time in that country, differing in character and -conduct. Some of them endeavoured to surpass in ferocity wild beasts; -they omitted no manner of barbarity, they sacrificed the vanquished in -whole troops, or, like butchers, cut off pieces and limbs of those that -were still living, and did not leave off till retributive justice, -which governs the affairs of man, plunged them into similar miseries. -Others, again, converted their frenzy and madness into a different kind -of wickedness. They adopted an inexpressible bitterness, spake gently, -and betrayed a ferocious temper under the mask of gentle language; [30] -they fawned like poisonous dogs, and brought about irremediable -miseries, leaving behind them in the cities, as monuments of their -impiety and hatred of mankind, the never to be forgotten miseries. But -neither the cruel tyrant nor the wily hypocrite could get any advantage -over the said brotherhood of Essenes or holy ones (Ἐσσαίων ἢ ὁσίων), -but disarmed by the virtues of these men, all recognised them as -independent and free by nature, praised their common meals and their -community of goods, which surpasses all description, and is an evident -proof of a perfect and very happy life.” - -Philo’s second account, which has been preserved by Eusebius in his -Praep. Evàng., viii, 11, from the lost treatise entitled Apology for -the Jews, is as follows:— [31] - -“Our lawgiver, Moses, formed innumerable (μυρίους) disciples into a -fellowship called Essenes, [32] who, as it appears, obtained this -appellation by virtue of their holiness (παρὰ τὴν ὁσιότητα). They dwell -in many cities of Judea, and in villages, and in large and populous -communities. Their order is not founded upon natural descent, but upon -admiration for virtue and sincere love for man. Hence there are -properly speaking no newly born ones among the Essenes, no children, no -youths, as the dispositions of these are unstable and liable to change -from the imperfections incident to their age; [33] but they are all -full grown men who are already approaching old age; and are no longer -carried away by the impetuosity of their bodily passions, but possess -the genuine and the only true and real liberty. A proof of their -freedom is to be found in their life. None of them strives to acquire -any private property, house, slave, farm, flocks, herds, or anything -which might be regarded as a source of riches, but they all give -everything to the common stock from which the common wants of all are -alike supplied. - -“They all dwell together in the same place, form themselves into -companies, societies, combinations and unions, [34] and work together -all their life for the common good of the brotherhood. The different -members of the order are engaged in different employment; they work -cheerfully and industriously, and never try to leave their employment -on account of cold, heat, or any change of weather. They go to their -daily work before the sun rises, and do not leave off till some time -after it has set, when they return home rejoicing no less than those -who have been exercising themselves in gymnastic contests. [35] They -believe that their employment is a sort of gymnastic exercise of more -benefit to life, greater pleasure both to soul and body, and of a more -enduring advantage than any mere athletic labours, because they can -cheerfully continue in their work as a recreation even when youth and -bodily strength are gone. Those who are acquainted with the cultivation -of the land are engaged in agriculture; others, again, who understand -the management of animals, attend to the flocks; some are skillful in -the management of bees; and others again, are artizans and -manufacturers, thus guarding against the want of anything. They do not -omit anything which is requisite to supply the absolute necessities of -life. - -“The appointed steward and general manager receives the wages which the -different people get for their respective employments, and forthwith -buys plenty of food and other necessaries of life. They eat at the same -table, and have every day the same food, being lovers of frugality and -moderation, and averse to luxury and extravagance as a disease of both -mind and body. Not only is their table in common, but their dress too -is in common. They have a store of rough cloaks in the winter, and in -the summer cheap garments without sleeves, to which every one can go -and freely take whichever kind he wants, for whatever belongs to one -belongs to all, and whatever belongs to all belongs to each individual. - -“If one of them is sick, he is cured from the common resources, and is -attended to by the general care and anxiety of the whole body. The old -men, even if they happen to be childless, [36] end their lives in a -most happy, prosperous and tenderly cared for old age, as if they were -not only the fathers of many children, but were even also particularly -happy in an affectionate offspring. They are looked upon by such a -number of people as worthy of so much honour and provident regard, that -they think themselves bound to care for them even more from inclination -than from any tie of natural affection. - -“Perceiving, with more than ordinary acuteness and accuracy, what is -alone, or at least above all other things, calculated to dissolve such -connections, they repudiate marriage; and at the same time practice -continence in an eminent degree. For no one of the Essenes marries a -wife, because woman is a selfish and excessively jealous creature, and -has great power to destroy the morals of man, and to mislead with -continual tricks; for she is always devising flattering speeches and -other kinds of hypocrisy as on a stage; bewitching the eyes and the -ears; and when they are subjugated like things stultified, she proceeds -to undermine the ruling intellect. [37] - -“But when she has children, the woman becomes full of pride and -arrogance, audaciously speaks out that which she previously merely -indicated in treacherous disguise, and without any shame compels one to -do whatever is hostile to the brotherhood; for he who is chained by the -charms of a woman or cares for children by necessity of nature, is no -longer the same person to others, but is entirely changed, having -unawares become a slave instead of a free man. - -“Such is the enviable system of life of the Essenes, so that not only -private individuals but even mighty kings have admired them, venerated -their brotherhood, and rendered their dignity and nobleness still -higher by the praise and honours which they lavished upon them.” - -Next, in point of time, is Caius Plinius Secundus, called Major, or the -elder, the celebrated author of the Historia Naturalis, who was born in -A.D. 23, and died A.D. 79. Pliny’s notice of the Essenes, which is to -be found in his Natural History, book v., chap, xvii., is as follows: - -“Towards the west [of the sea] and sufficiently distant from it, so as -to escape its noxious exhalations (ab occidente litora Esseni fugiunt, -usque qua nocent), are the Essenes. They are a hermitical society, -marvellous beyond all others throughout the whole earth. They live -without any women, without gratifying sensual desires, without money, -and in the company of palm trees. Their ranks are daily made up by -multitudes of new comers who resort to them; and who being weary of -life, and driven by the surges of ill-fortune, adopt their manner of -life. Thus it is that, through thousands of ages (per saeculorum -millia), [38] incredible to relate, this people prolongs its existence -without any one being born among them: so fruitful to them are the -weary lives of others.” - -Next in point of time is Josephus, or Joseph ben Matthias, better known -by the name Flavius Josephus, who was born in Jerusalem about 37, A.D. -The description which this learned Jewish warrior and historian gives -us of the Essenes, although somewhat marred by being made to harmonise -with the systems of Greek philosophy, is very important, inasmuch as -Josephus was not only a Palestinian Jew, but at one period of his life -had actually joined the brotherhood. He tells us in his autobiography, -that when sixteen years old he determined to examine for himself the -respective merits of the three predominant sects, viz., of the -Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes, with the view of making a selection -from among them. His accounts of the Essenes are dispersed through his -works. The following is the first description contained in his Jewish -War, book ii, chap. viii, sec. 2–13. - -“§ 2. There are three sects of philosophers among the Jews. The -followers of the first are called Pharisees, of the second Sadducees, -and of the third, who really seem to practise holiness, Essenes. [39] -Jews by birth, they love each other more than the others. [40] They -reject pleasure as an evil, and regard continence and not yielding to -passions as virtues. They despise marriage, and adopt the children of -others while still tender and susceptible of instruction, [41] and -regard them as their own relations, and train them in their practices. -They do not, however, repudiate marriage, and its consequent, -succession of the race in themselves; but they are afraid of the -lasciviousness of women, and are persuaded that none of them preserve -their fidelity to one man. [42] - -“§ 3. They despise riches, have all things in common in a very -admirable manner, and there is not one to be found among them who is -richer than another; for it is a law that those who enter the sect must -give up their possessions to the society as common property, [43] so -that there is not to be seen among them all, either the abjectness of -poverty or the distinction of riches; but as every man’s goods are cast -into a common treasury, they all, like brothers, have one patrimony. -They regard ointment as defiling; and if one happens to be anointed -against his will, he immediately wipes it off his body. [44] To be -unadorned but dressed in white they regard as commendable. They have -stewards of their common property, appointed by general election, and -every one without distinction is proposed for all the offices. - -“§ 4. They have no separate city, but some of them live anywhere; and -if any of the society come from other places, whatever they have lies -open for them, just as if it were their own; and they go to those whom -they have never seen before as if they had been most intimate. Hence -they take nothing with them when they go on a journey, [45] but arms -for defence against robbers. A steward is appointed in every city of -this order to provide strangers with clothes and other necessaries. -[46] The keeping and appearance of their body are such as of children -brought up in fear; they change neither garments nor shoes till they -are worn out or made unfit by time. [47] They neither sell nor buy -anything among themselves, but everyone gives of that which he has to -him that wants, and gets from him that which he needs; and even without -requital they can freely take whatever they want. - -“§ 5. Their piety towards God is extraordinary, for they never speak -about worldly matters before the sun rises, but offer up, with their -faces towards it, some of the prayers transmitted by their forefathers, -as if they supplicated it to rise. [48] Hereupon, they are all sent by -the overseers, every one to work in the department in which he is -skilled; and, having diligently laboured till the fifth hour, assemble -again together in one place, girt round with their linen apron, and -have a baptism with cold water. [49] After this lustration they resort -to a special house, in which no one of another faith is admitted, and -go to the refectory purified as into a holy temple. [50] Having quietly -taken their seats the baker gives every one a loaf of bread according -to order, and the cook places before each one a dish with one sort of -food. The priest commences with prayer, and no one is allowed to taste -his food before grace is said. He also returns thanks after the meal; -for both at the commencement and at the conclusion they praise God as -the giver of their food. [51] Whereupon they put off their white -garments as if they were sacred, and betake themselves again to their -work till evening. On returning again they take their supper together, -at which strangers, who happen to be in the place, are allowed to sit -down with them. No noise or tumult ever desecrates their house, but -they let every one take part in the conversation in turn; and the -silence of those who are within appears to those that are without as -some awful mystery. The cause of this is the uninterrupted sobriety, as -well as the fact that their eating and drinking are so measured out as -just to suffice the cravings of nature. - -“§ 6. Whilst they do nothing without the injunctions of their -overseers, yet there are two things in which they have free action, -viz., helping the needy, and shewing mercy; to help the deserving when -they are in want, and to give food to the hungry, they have perfect -liberty; but to give anything to their relations they are not allowed -without the permission of the overseers. They are just dispensers of -their anger, curbers of their passions, representatives of fidelity, -ministers of peace; and every word with them is of more force than an -oath. They avoid taking an oath, and regard it as worse than perjury; -for they say that he who is not believed without calling on God to -witness is already condemned of falsehood. [52] They take -extraordinarily great pains in studying the writings of the ancients, -and select that especially which is beneficial both for the soul and -body; hence they investigate medical roots and the property of minerals -for the cure of distempers. [53] - -“§ 7. When any one desires to enter the sect, he is not immediately -admitted, but although he has to remain a whole year without, yet he is -obliged to observe their ascetic rules of living, and they give him an -axe, an apron as mentioned above, and a white garment. [54] If he has -given proof of continence during this time, he approaches nearer to -their life and partakes of the holier water of purification; but is -still not as yet admitted to their common table. Having thus given -proof of his perseverance, his conduct is tested two more years, and, -if found worthy, he is admitted into the society. But before he touches -the common meal, he swears, by most awful oaths, [55] first to fear -God, and next to exercise justice towards all men—neither to wrong any -one of his own accord nor by the command of others; always to detest -the wicked and side with the righteous; ever to keep faith inviolable -with all men, especially with those in authority, for no one comes to -office without the will of God; [56] not to be proud of his power nor -to outshine his subordinates, either in his garments or greater finery, -if he himself should attain to office; always to love truth and strive -to reclaim all liars; to keep his hands clear from stealing, and his -mind from unholy gain; not to conceal anything from the brotherhood, -nor disclose anything belonging to them to those without, though it -were at the hazard of his life. He has, moreover, to swear not to -communicate to any one their doctrines in any other way than he has -received them; [57] to abstain from robbing the commonwealth; and -equally to preserve the writings of the society and the names of the -angels. [58] By such oaths they bind those who enter the brotherhood. - -“§ 8. Such as are caught in heinous sins are excommunicated from the -society; and the excommunicated frequently die a miserable death. For, -being bound by oaths and customs, they cannot receive food from any out -of the society, so that they are forced to eat herbs till, their bodies -being famished with hunger, they perish. [59] Hence they -compassionately receive many of them again when they are at their last -gasp, thinking that suffering, approaching unto death, is sufficient -for their sins. - -“§ 9. In their verdicts they are most exact and just, and never give -sentence if there are less than a hundred of the brotherhood present: -but what is then decreed is irrevocable. Next to God they have the -highest veneration for the name of the lawgiver, Moses, and punish with -death any one who blasphemes it. To submit to the elders and to the -majority they regard as a duty: hence, when ten of them sit together, -no one will speak if the other nine do not agree to it. They avoid -spitting before the face, or to the right hand, [60] and are also -stricter than all other Jews not to touch any labour on the Sabbath -day—for they not only prepare their Sabbath-day’s food the day before, -that they may not kindle a fire on that day, but they will not move a -vessel out of its place [61] nor go to ease nature. On all other days -they dig a pit of a foot deep with the spade (such an one being given -to the novice), and having covered it all round with a cover, that it -may not offend the Divine rays, they set themselves over it, and then -put the earth, that was dug out again into the pit; and do this, after -having chosen the most lonely places. And although the voiding of -bodily excrements is natural, yet it is their custom to bathe after it, -as if they had been defiled. [62] - -“§ 10. They are divided, according to the time of leading this mode of -life, into four different classes, and the juniors are so much inferior -to the seniors, that the latter must wash themselves when they happen -to touch the former, as if they had been defiled by a stranger. [63] -They live to a great age, so that many of them live to above a hundred -years—arising from the simplicity of their diet, as it appears to me, -and from their order. They despise suffering, and overcome pain by -fortitude. Death, if connected with honour, they look upon as better -than long life. Of the firmness of their minds in all cases the war -with the Romans has given ample proof; in which, though they were -tortured, racked, burned, squeezed, and subjected to all the -instruments of torment, that they might be forced to blaspheme the -lawgiver or eat what was forbidden, yet they could not be made to do -either of them; nor would they even once flatter their tormentors or -shed a tear, but, smiling through their torments and mocking their -tormentors, they cheerfully yielded up their souls, as those who would -soon receive them back again. [64] - -“§ 11. For they firmly believe that the bodies perish and their -substance is not enduring, but that the souls are immortal—continue for -ever and come out of the most subtile ether—are enveloped by their -bodies, to which they are attracted through a natural inclination, as -if by hedges—and that when freed from the bonds of the body, they, as -if released from a long servitude, rejoice and mount upwards. In -harmony with the opinion of the Greeks, [65] they say that for the good -souls there is a life beyond the ocean, and a region which is never -molested either with showers or snow or intense heat—is always -refreshed with the gentle gales of wind constantly breathing from the -ocean; whilst to the wicked souls they assign a dark and cold corner, -full of never-ceasing punishments. And it seems to be according to the -same opinion that the Greeks assigned to their valiant men, whom they -called heroes and demigods, the Island of the Blessed, but to the souls -of the wicked the regions of the impious in Hades; as also their fables -speak of several there punished, as Sisyphus and Tantalus and Ixion and -Tityus. This they teach, partly because they believe that the souls are -immortal, and partly for the encouragement of virtue and the -discouragement of vice. For good men are made better in their lives by -the hope of reward after their death, whilst the passions of the wicked -are restrained by the fear they are in that, although they should be -concealed in this life, after death they must suffer everlasting -punishment. This is the doctrine of the Essenes about the -soul—possessing thereby an irresistible bait for those who have once -tasted their philosophy. - -“§ 12. There are also some among them who undertake to foretell future -events, having been brought up from their youth in the study of the -sacred Scripture, in divers purifications, and in the sayings of the -prophets; and it is very seldom that they fail in their predictions. - -“§ 13. There is also another order of Essenes who, in their way of -living, customs, and laws exactly agree with the others, excepting only -that they differ from them about marriage. For they believe that those -who do not marry cut off the principal part of human life—that is, -succession—especially that, if all were of the same opinion, the whole -race would soon be extinguished. They, however, try their spouses for -three years, and after giving evidence, by three natural purgations, -that they are fit to bear children, they marry them. They have no -connubial intercourse with them when with child, to show that they do -not marry to gratify lust, but only to have children. The women, too, -have their garments on when they have baths, just as the men have on -their aprons. Such are the customs of this brotherhood.” - -The next mention which Josephus makes of them is in his Antiq. Book -xiii. chap. v. § 9, and is as follows:— - -“§ 9. At this time [166 B.C.] there were three sects (αἱρέσεις) among -the Jews, differing in their opinion about human affairs. The first was -called the sect of the Pharisees, the second the sect of the Sadducees, -and the third the sect of the Essenes. The Pharisees affirm that some -things only, but not all, are the work of fate (τῆς εἱμαρμένης), and -some are in our own power, whether they should take place or whether -they should not occur; the sect of the Essenes maintain that fate -governs all things, [66] and that nothing can befal man contrary to its -determination and will (ψῆφος); whilst the Sadducees reject fate, -saying that there is no such thing, and that human events do not -proceed from it, and ascribe all to ourselves, so that we ourselves are -the cause of our fortunes, and receive what is evil from our own -inconsiderateness. However, I have given a more minute description of -this in the second book of the Jewish War.” - -He speaks of them again in Antiq. Book xv. chap. x. § 4, towards the -end, and § 5, as follows:— - -“§ 4. The Essenes, as we call them, were also exempted from this -necessity [of taking an oath of allegiance to Herod]. These men live -the same kind of life which among the Greeks has been ordered by -Pythagoras. [67] I have discoursed more fully about them elsewhere. The -reason, however, why Herod had the Essenes in such honour, and thought -more highly of them than of mortal nature, is worthy of record. For -this account, too, is not unsuitable for this history, inasmuch as it -shows the people’s opinion about the Essenes. - -“§ 5. There was a certain Essene, named Menahem (Μενάημος = מנחם) who -was celebrated not only for the uprightness of his conduct, but also -for the fore-knowledge of the future proceeding from God. When he once -saw Herod, as a boy going to school, he addressed him by the name of -‘King of the Jews.’ [68] Herod thought that he did not know him or that -he jested, and reminded him that he was of common origin. But Menahem -smiled on him most friendly, clapped him on the back with his hand, and -said—‘Thou wilt, nevertheless, be king, and wilt begin thy reign -happily, for God has found thee worthy of it. And remember the blows -that Menahem has given thee, as being the symbol of the change of thy -fortune. For this assurance will be salutary for thee when thou wilt -love justice and piety towards God and equity towards thy citizens. -However, I know that thou wilt not be such a one, for I can perceive it -all. Thou wilt, indeed, excel more than any one in happiness, and -obtain an everlasting reputation, but thou wilt forget piety and -justice. This will not be concealed from God, for he will visit thee -with his wrath for it, towards the end of thy life.’ Herod paid very -little attention to it at that time, as he had no hope of it. But as he -soon afterwards advanced to the dignity of king and was happy, he -ordered Menahem to come to him in the height of his dominion, and asked -him how long he should reign; but Menahem did not tell him. Seeing that -he was silent, he asked again whether he should reign ten years. -Whereupon he replied, ‘Yes; twenty, nay, thirty years;’ but did not -determine the exact limit of his reign. Herod, rejoicing on it, gave -Menahem his hand and dismissed him, and from that time continued to -honour the Essenes. I thought of relating this to the readers (though -to some it may seem incredible), and of making it known, as it concerns -us, because many of the Essenes are highly esteemed for their virtuous -conduct and knowledge of Divine things.” - -Josephus also relates instances in which Essenes foretold future -events, in Antiq., book xviii., chap, ii., § 2; book xviii., chap. -xiii. § 3; and Jewish War, book 1, chap. iii., § 5. - -The last account which Josephus gives us is to be found in his Antiq., -book xviii., chap, i., § 2 and 5. - -“§ 2. There have been three philosophies among the Jews ever since the -ancient time of the fathers (ἐκ τοῦ πάνυ ἀρχαίου τῶν πατρίων), that of -the Essenes, and that of the Sadducees, and a third which the so-called -Pharisees followed. Although I have already spoken of them in the -second book of the Jewish War, yet will I mention here also something -about them. - -“§ 5. The doctrine of the Essenes delights in leaving all to God (Θεῷ -καταλιπεῖν φιλεῖ τὰ πάντα). They regard the soul as immortal, and say -that the attainment to virtue must be fought for with all our might. -Although they send consecrated gifts to the Temple, yet they never -bring any sacrifice on account of the different rules of purity which -they observe; hence, being excluded from the common sanctuary, they -offer sacrifices in themselves (spiritually). Otherwise, they are in -their manner of life the best of men, and employ themselves wholly in -the labour of agriculture. Their uprightness is to be admired above all -others who endeavour to practice virtue; such uprightness, which is by -no means to be found among the Greeks and foreigners, is not of recent -date, but has existed among them from times of yore (ἐκ παλαιοῦ), -striving most scrupulously not to disturb the community of goods, and -that the rich should not enjoy more of the common property than the -poor. This is the conduct of this people who are more than four -thousand in number. They never marry wives, nor endeavour after the -possession of property; for they believe that the latter leads to -injustice, and the former yields opportunities for domestic discord. -Living by themselves they serve each other. They choose good men, who -are also priests, to be the stewards of their incomes and the produce -of the fields, as well as to procure the corn and food. They do not -differ at all in their living, but are more like those whom the Dacae -call Polistae.” - -We notice next the account of Caius Julius Solinus, the author of the -Geographical compendium called Polyhistor, who flourished about 238 -A.D. His accounts, which are to be found in chap. xxxv. § 7–10 of his -work, are evidently derived from Pliny. - -“In the interior of Judea, towards the west, are the Essenes, who -differ from the usages of all other nations in their marvellous -constitutions, and who, according to my opinion, have been appointed by -divine providence for this mode of life. No woman is to be found there; -connubial pleasures they have entirely renounced; money they know not, -and palm-berries are their food. [69] Not a single birth takes place -there, and yet there is no want of population. The place itself is -devoted to modesty. Although a very large number of persons run to it -from all quarters, yet none is admitted who is not thought to possess -purity, fidelity and innocence; for, if one has been guilty of the -slightest misdemeanour, though he endeavour to obtain admission by -offering never so large a fortune, he is excluded by a divine decree. -Thus it is that through an immense space of ages (per immensum spatium -saeculorum), incredible to relate, [70] this society is perpetuated -though no child is born among them.” - -The next account is that of Porphyry, the neo-Platonic philosopher and -celebrated antagonist of Christianity, who was born 233 A.D. and died -about 306 A.D. His description of the Essenes, which is given in his -treatise On the Abstinence from Animal Food (Lugduni ap. Morillon, -1620, p. 381, &c.), is, as he himself tells us, taken from Josephus. He -has, however, made some alterations, as may be seen from the following: - -“There were three sorts of philosophers among the Jews, the first were -headed by the Pharisees, the second by the Sadducees, and the third, -who seemed the most honourable (σεμνοτάτη), by the Essenes. The latter -formed such a society as Josephus has described it in different parts -of his works, as well as in the second book of the Jewish History, -which he composed in seven books, as in the eighteenth book of his -Antiquities, which he composed in twenty books, and in the second part -to the Greeks. [71] - -“The Essenes are Jews by birth, and love one another more than other -people. They avoid sensual enjoyments as vices, and regard continence -and the power to resist the passions as the first virtue; they despise -marriage and adopt the children of strangers, whilst still young and -suitable for instruction, regard them as their own, and train them in -their usages. They do not repudiate matrimony and child birth in -themselves, but they guard against the sensuality of women. They -despise riches, and there is a wonderful community of goods among them. -There is no one found among them who occupies a distinguished position -through his wealth; for they have a law that those who enter the -society give up their possessions to the brotherhood, so that there is -no such thing among them as abjectness of poverty or arrogance of -riches; but the possessions of all put together form a fraternal and -common property. If one of them happens to be inadvertently anointed, -he immediately washes his whole body; for they regard it as -praiseworthy to have a dry skin, and they are always dressed in white. -They appoint stewards to manage their common property; and every one, -without distinction, is eligible for all the offices. - -“They are not confined to one city, but live in different places, and -everything they have is at the service of the members who happen to -come from another city. Though meeting for the first time they at once -salute each other as intimate friends (ἴσασιν ὥσπερ συνήθεις); hence -they travel without taking anything with them. They do not change -either garments or sandals till they are torn or worn out by age; they -neither buy nor sell, but every one gives of that which he has to him -that wants it, and receives that which he needs; but even without -receiving anything in return they freely communicate to him that wants. -Their piety towards God is extraordinary. None of them speak about -anything profane before the sun rises; but they offer to it some of the -prayers transmitted to them by their forefathers, as if they -supplicated it to rise, &c., &c.” He repeats almost literally the whole -of § 5 of Josephus On the Jewish War, book ii. chap. viii., which we -have given above, p, 43. - -Porphyry omits § 6 of Josephus, but gives, with a few verbal -alterations, both the whole of § 7, which describes the admission into -the order, and § 8, which describes the punishment. He omits the -greater part of § 9, and adds the following statement, which is not to -be found in Josephus. “Their food is so poor and scanty that they do -not require to ease nature on the Sabbath, [72] which they devote to -singing praises to God and to rest.” He omits from § 10 the description -of the division of the Essenes into four classes, and simply mentions -firmness in suffering and death. He also omits from § 11 the whole -piece beginning with the words “In harmony with the opinion of the -Greeks, &c.;” whilst he not only gives the whole of § 12, but has also -the following addition, “With such a manner of life, and with their -firm adhesion to truthfulness and piety, there are naturally many among -them who can foretel future events, &c.;” and concludes with the words, -“This is the nature of the order of the Essenes among the Jews,” -omitting altogether what Josephus says in § 13 about those Essenes who -marry. - -Epiphanius, bishop of Constantia and metropolitan of Cyprus, who was -born in Bezanduca, a small town of Palestine, in the first part of the -fourth century, and died in 403, has also given us some brief notices -of the Essenes in his celebrated work Against the Heretics. His first -notice is to be found in Adver. Haer., lib. i. ord. x. p. 28, ed. Col., -1682, under the title Against the Essenes and the Samaritans, and is as -follows: - -“The Essenes continue in their first position, and have not altered at -all. According to them there have been some dissensions among the -Gorthenes, in consequence of some difference of opinion which has taken -place among them—I mean among the Sebuens, Essenes and Gorthenes. The -difference of opinion relates to the following matter. The law of Moses -commands the Israelites of all places to come up to Jerusalem to the -three festivals, viz., the feasts of the Passover, Pentecost and -Tabernacles. As the Jews in Judea and Samaria were largely dispersed, -it is supposed that those of them who made their pilgrimage to -Jerusalem went through Samaritan cities, and as the Samaritans assemble -at the same time to celebrate the festivals, a conflict arose between -them.” - -Epiphanius speaks of them again (Adv. Haer., lib. i. ord. xix. p. 39), -and under the title, Against the Ossenes (κατὰ Ὀσσηνῶν), as follows: - -“Next follow the Ossenes, who were closely connected with the former -sect. They too are Jews, hypocrites in their demeanour, and peculiar -people in their conceits. [73] They originated, according to the -tradition which I received, in the regions of Nabatea, Itruria, -Moabitis and Antilis, (Ἀρηϊλίτις), in the surrounding neighbourhood of -the so-called Dead Sea.... The name Ossenes, according to its -etymology, signifies the stout race (στιβυρὸν γένος).... A certain -person named Elxai joined them at the time of the Emperor Trajan, after -the advent of the Saviour, who was a false prophet. He wrote a -so-called prophetical book, which he pretended to be according to -divine wisdom. He had a brother named Jeeus, who also misled people in -their manner of life, and caused them to err with his doctrine. A Jew -by birth, and professing the Jewish doctrines, he did not live -according to the Mosaic law, but introduced quite different things, and -misled his own sect.... He joined the sect of the Ossenes, of which -some remnants are still to be found in the same regions of Nabatea and -Perea towards Moabitis. These people are now called Simseans.” [74] - -“But hear the Sadducee’s nonsense (comp. ibid., p. 42): he rejects the -sacrificial and altar services, as repulsive to the Deity, and as -things which, according to the meaning of the fathers and the Mosaic -law, were never offered to the Lord in a worthy manner. Yet he says -that we must pray with our faces to Jerusalem, where the sacrificial -altar and the sacrifices have their place. He rejects the eating of -animal flesh which is common among the Jews, and other things; nay, -even the sacrificial altar and the sacrificial fire, as being foreign -to the Deity. The purifying water, he says, is worthy of God, but the -fire is unworthy, because of the declaration of the prophet: ‘Children, -go ye not there to see the fire of the sacrifices, for ye err; yea, it -is already an error to think such a thing.’ ‘If you look at the fire -very closely,’ says he, ‘it is still far off. Moreover, go ye not to -look at the sacrificial fire, but go ye rather to the doctrine of the -water....’ There is much more of such idle talk to be found among the -Ossenes.” [75] - -These are the sources from which writers upon the Essenes have, till -within very lately, drawn their information. As to the account of -Eusebius (comp. Hist. Ecclesiast., lib. ii, cap. xvii), to which appeal -is often made, it is nothing but a Christianized reproduction of the -so-called Philonic description of the Therapeutae. It would therefore -be useless to give it. In looking through these accounts, it will be -seen that there are only three independent ones among them, -namely—Philo’s, Josephus’s and Pliny’s; as the notice of Solinus is -merely a repetition of Pliny, the description of Porphyry is almost a -literal reproduction of Josephus; whilst the distorted scraps of -Epiphanius are not only worse than useless, but are unworthy of him, -and the account of Eusebius is simply misleading, inasmuch as it is a -repetition of an apocryphal story, which has nothing to do with the -Essenes. - - - - - - - - -III. - - -Having given the ancient documents, all that now remains is that I -should give a brief sketch of the most important modern literature on -the Essenes. In doing this part of my task, as in the former, I shall -try as much as it is possible to follow the chronological order. - -1513–1577.—Accordingly De Rossi occupies the first position. In his -erudite work, called Meor Enajim, i.e., The Light of the Eyes, which is -a Cyclopœdia of Biblical literature and criticism, this profound critic -gives us a brief notice of this brotherhood, in which he maintains that -the Essenes are identical with the Greek sect called Baithusians in the -Talmud, and Therapeutae by Philo. His account is as follows: “It has -often appeared to me strange that the Talmud should say nothing -whatever about that sect which obtained a good report among the -nations. I therefore examined the works of our sages, to ascertain -whether I could find in them any distinction made between the Sadducees -and the Baithusians. And it appeared to me that though both alike -denied the traditional law (התורה שעל פה), yet the Baithusians are no -where charged with the sin of denying, like the Sadducees, the -immortality of the soul and future judgment. Moreover, I thought of the -similarity of the names Baithusians and Essenes (ביתוסים איסיאי), and -especially of the manner in which the ancients changed names. Now, -owing to the word בית being so frequently found prefixed to names of -schools and families, the appellation ביתוסים might easily have -originated from a junction of the words בית איסיאי. I also saw the -passage in the Talmud, Sabbath, cap. viii, fol. 108, as quoted also in -Sopherim, cap. i, which is as follows:—‘A Baithusian asked R. Joshuah -whence do we know that phylacteries must not be written upon the skin -of an unclean animal?’ To which he replied—‘It is written that the -Lord’s law may be in thy mouth, (Exod. xiii, 9) this signifies that -phylacteries must be written upon the skin of an animal which thou -canst take into thy mouth, i.e., eat.’ To this he said—‘This being the -case, we must also not write the phylacteries upon the skin of an -animal which died;’ [for an Israelite is as much forbidden to taste the -flesh of it, as to eat an unclean animal.] Hereupon the Rabbi -replied—‘I will tell thee a parable, to make the thing clear. Two men -are condemned to death: the one the king kills, and the other is killed -by the executioner: now, which of the two dost thou esteem higher? -Surely the one whom the king himself has executed. So the animal which -died, [i.e., which the King of Kings caused to die] must be preferred -to the others.’ Whereupon the Baithusian said—‘Accordingly, we ought -also to eat it.’ R. Joshuah replied—‘The Bible prohibits it (Deut. -xiv), and dost thou want to eat it?’ The Baithusian then said—‘קלוס.’ -This expression Rashi of blessed memory rightly says is Greek; i.e. -‘καλὸν.’ Hence it is to be inferred that the Baithusian was a Greek; -and, indeed, we know from Philo and Josephus that the Essenes were also -Greek Jews, living in Alexandria.... From all these things I easily -quieted my mind, and concluded that the Baithusians are the same as the -Essenes.’ [76] Now, from a careful perusal of the account given by -Josephus of the Essenes, it will be seen that he never describes them -as Greek Jews. Besides, this is utterly at variance with ancient -tradition, as the Talmudic authorities most positively declare that the -Baithusians and Sadducees were both alike in doctrine, that both -derived their names from the founder of these sects, Baithos (ביתוס) -and Zadok (צדיק), the disciples of Antigonus of Soho, and that they -gave rise to these sects, through misinterpreting the following saying -of their master [77] which he had received from Simon the Just:—“Be not -like servants who serve their master for the sake of receiving a -reward, but be ye like servants who serve their master without the view -of receiving a reward,” recorded in Aboth. i. 3. Upon this Aboth d. R. -Nathan (cap. v.) remarks, “Antigonus’ two disciples at first continued -implicitly to teach this saying to their disciples, and these again to -their disciples. At last, however, they began to ponder over it, and -said—‘What did our fathers mean by this saying? Is a labourer to labour -all day and not receive his wages in the evening? Now if our fathers -had believed that there is another world, and a resurrection of the -dead, they would not have spoken thus.’ Hence they dissented from the -law, and from them originated the two sects, the Sadducees and the -Baithusians, the Sadducees from Sadok and the Baithusians from Baithus. -They used gold and silver vessels all the days of their life, not -because they were proud, but because they said that the Pharisees -themselves have a tradition that they afflict themselves in this world, -and have nothing in the world to come.” From this we see that 1. The -Baithusians, like the Sadducees, derived their appellation from the -proper name of their founder, which is Baithus ביתוס so that the -first part of the name בית cannot be separated from it. 2. Like the -Sadducees, the Baithusians denied the immortality of the soul and the -existence of angels, whereas the Essenes firmly believed in the -immortality of the soul, and made the angels play a very important part -in their creed. That the Sadducees and the Baithusians were considered -to be identical, or, at all events, to hold similar doctrines is also -evident from the fact that what is in one place of the Talmud ascribed -to the former, is in another place ascribed to the latter. Thus, for -instance, in Succa 48 b. the Sadducees are said to have questioned the -necessity of bringing a libation of water on the Feast of Tabernacles; -in Tosifta Succa cap. iii. it is ascribed to the Baithusians. In -Maccoth, 5, b. Chagiga, 16 b. it is said that the Sadducees urged that -a false witness should only then be executed if the individual whom he -had falsely accused had already been executed; in Tosifta Sanhedrin, -cap. vi. the same thing is ascribed to the Baithusians. According to -Joma, 19 b. 53 a, the Sadducees would have it that the High Priest -should put the incense on the fire outside the Sanctuary on the great -Day of Atonement, in Tosifta Joma, cap. 1, and Jerusalem Joma, i. 5, -this is also ascribed to the Baithusians. Comp. also 115, b., Megillath -Taanith, cap. vi., with Tosifta Jadajim cap. ii. And 4. The Baithusians -are constantly spoken of as heretics and false witnesses (comp. -Jerusalem Rosh Ha-Shana, ii, 1; Babl. ibid. 226), which is utterly at -variance with the high character given to the Essenes even by those who -belonged to opposite sects. - -1587–1643.—Our learned countryman, Dr. Thomas Godwyn occupies the next -position. In his interesting and erudite volume, entitled Moses and -Aaron: which was first published in London 1625, Godwyn devotes the -twelfth chapter of the first book to the Essenes. The etymology of this -name he takes to be the Syriac אסא to heal, to cure diseases, and -submits that they were called Essenes = θεραπευται physicians, because -they cultivated the study of medicine. His summary of their doctrines -and practices is made from Josephus’ description of them as well as -from Philo’s reputed account of the Therapeutae which has nothing to do -with the Palestinian Essenes. Godwyn also gives a number of supposed -parallels between the doctrines and practices of Essenism and -Pythagorism. He does not attempt to account for these resemblances, nor -does he try to trace the origin of the brotherhood. He is, however, -certain that they existed in the time of Judas Maccabæus and “continued -until the day of our Saviour and after; for Philo and Josephus speak of -them as living in their time.” He assigns the following reasons for -their not being mentioned in the New Testament 1. Their being small in -number. 2. “They were peaceable and quiet, not opposing any; and -therefore not so liable to reproof as the Pharisees and Sadducees, who -opposed each other, and both joined against Christ.” 3. They were -passed over in silence in the New Testament just “as the Rechabites in -the Old Testament, of whom there is mention only once and that -obliquely, although their order continued about three hundred years, -before this testimony was given of them by the Prophet Jeremiah.” And -4. “Though the name of the Essenes be not found in Scripture, yet we -shall find in St. Paul’s Epistles many things reproved, which were -taught in the school of the Essenes. Of this nature was that advice -given unto Timothy:—‘Drink no longer water, but use a little wine.’ (1 -Tim. v. 23). Again, ‘Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain -from meats is a doctrine of devils’ (1 Tim. iv. 3); but especially -Colossians ii., in many passages the Apostle seemeth directly to point -at them, ‘Let no man condemn you in meat and drink’ (verse 16): ‘Let no -man bear rule over you, by humbleness of mind and worshipping of -angels’ (verse 18) ‘Why are ye subject to ordinances (τί δογματίζεσθε -verse 20)?’ The Apostle useth the word δόγματα which was applied by the -Essenes to denote their ordinances aphorisms or constitutions. In the -verse following he gives an instance of some particulars, ‘Touch not, -taste not, handle not’ (ver. 21). Now the junior company of Essenes -might not touch the seniors. And in their diet their taste was limited -to bread, salt, water and hyssop. And these ordinances they undertook -διὰ πόθον σοφίας saith Philo, for the love of wisdom; but the Apostle -concludeth (ver. 23) that these things had only λόγον σοφίας a show of -wisdom. And whereas Philo termeth the religion of the Essenes by the -name of θεράπεια which word signifieth religious worship; the Apostle -termeth in the same verse εθιλεθρεκείαν voluntary religious worship or -will worship; yea, where he termeth their doctrine πάτρων φιλοσοφιας a -kind of philosophy received from their forefathers by tradition; St. -Paul biddeth them beware of philosophy (ver. 8).” I have given this -extract in full because succeeding writers have with more or less -exactness based their opinion upon it. In animadverting upon it, I need -only refer to the former part of this Essay, where it will be seen that -some of the things here mentioned, are not peculiar to the Essenes, and -others do not belong to them at all, whilst the last quotation from -Philo describes the Therapeutae and not the Essenes. [78] - -1628–1678.—Next in point of time is Theophilus Gale, who gives us a -description of the Essenes in his famous work called The Court of the -Gentiles, part ii. (Oxford, 1671), book ii. § 9, p. 146–156. As might -be expected from this learned writer, who wrote this elaborate work to -demonstrate that “the original of all human literature, both philology -and philosophy, is from the Scriptures and the Jewish Church,” he -endeavours to prove that Pythagoras took the whole of his philosophic -system from the Essenes. “As for the origination of their name,” Gale -tells us, “they were called חסדים i.e. according to the Greek καθαροὶ -and according to our English dialect pure. Now the origination or rise -of these Essenes I conceive (by the best conjectures I can make from -antiquity), to be in or immediately after the Babylonian captivity -(though some make them later), and the occasion of their separation and -consociation seems this. Many of the carnal Jews defiling themselves -either by being too deeply plunged in worldly affairs, even to the -neglect of their religion, or, which was worse, by sensual compliances -with their idolatrous lords, thereby to secure their carnal interests, -these חסדים or Essenes, to preserve themselves from these common -pollutions, separated and retired themselves from the crowd of worldly -affairs into an holy solitude, and private condition of life; where -they entered into a strict confederation or consociation to lead -together a collegiate devout life.” [79] He then gives an epitome of -their doctrines and practices, and finally endeavours to shews that -Pythagoras got his system from them. In doing this, Gale mixes up the -Therapeutae with the Essenes, and follows largely the description of -Godwyn. - -1643–1724.—We then come to Dean Prideaux, who has a lengthy description -of the Essenes in The Old and New Testaments Connected, part ii. book -v., which first appeared in London, 1717. The chief value of Prideaux’s -work on this subject consists in the fact, that he has given in English -Philo and Josephus on the Essenes, as well as the short notice from -Pliny. In his own remarks, which follow these extracts, he, in common -with his predecessors, mixes up the Therapeutae with the Essenes, and -tries to repel the Romanists who adopted the assertion of Eusebius -(Hist. Ecclesiast. lib. ii. c. 17), that these Therapeutae or -contemplative Essenes were Christian monks instituted by St. Mark. He -also endeavours to expose the folly of the Deists, who infer, from the -agreement between the Christian religion and the documents of the -Essenes, that Christ and his followers were no other than a sect -branched out from that of the Essenes. Among the accusations which the -Dean brings against the Essenes for violating the law of God, is the -charge that they “absolutely condemned servitude which the holy -Scriptures of the New Testament (Philemon 9–21), as well as the Old, -allow.” [80] Instead of blaming them for repudiating slavery, we -believe that the civilized world in the present day will be unanimous -in pronouncing it to have been one of the glorious features of -Essenism, anticipating the spirit of Christianity and the philanthropy -of the nineteenth century. - -1653–1723.—Basnage gives a very lengthy account of the Essenes in his -History of the Jews lib. ii. chaps. xii. xiii. Those who are acquainted -with the writings of this learned Frenchman, know that he could not -write on anything without bringing together a mass of useful -information. He, however, mistook the character of the Essenes, as well -as the value of the documents upon which he relies. Preferring Philo’s -account to that of Josephus, though the latter lived amongst the -Essenes, Basnage confounds the brotherhood with the Therapeutae, and -hence asserts that “they borrowed several superstitions from the -Egyptians, among whom they retired.” Through this, he is led to occupy -by far the greater part of his description with the needless discussion -of the question “Whether the Essenes from being Jews were converted to -Christianity by St. Mark, and founded a monastic life.” [81] - -1692–1762.—Dr. Jennings’ chapter on the Essenes is simply a commentary -on Godwyn’s account. Jennings disputes some of the imaginary parallels -between Essenism and Pythagorism exhibited by Godwyn, and inclines to -the opinion “that the Essenes begun a little before the time of the -Maccabees, when the faithful Jews were forced to fly from the cruel -persecutions of their enemies into deserts and caves, and by living in -those retreats, many of them being habituated to retirement, which -thereby became most agreeable to them, they chose to continue it, even -when they might have appeared upon the public stage again, and -accordingly formed themselves into recluses.” As to the difficulty to -account for “the absolute silence of the evangelical history concerning -the Essenes,” Jennings reiterates the remarks of Godwyn upon the -subject. [82] - -In 1821, appeared in Berlin, Bellermann’s valuable little volume on the -Essenes and Therapeutae. [83] The author with characteristic German -industry and perseverance, brought together in this monograph the -ancient documents on the Essenes. His critical acumen, however, is not -commensurate to his industry, and while his little volume will -deservedly continue to be a useful manual for the student who wishes to -acquaint himself with what Philo, Pliny, Josephus, Solinus, Porphyry, -Epiphanius and Eusebius said upon this subject, it is to be questioned -whether Bellermann’s conclusions will be shared by many. He is of -opinion that “the Essenes and Baithusians are the same both in name and -doctrine,” and that “the Essenes have four other names in history -besides their proper name, viz.:—they are called, 1, Therapeutae by the -Greek Alexandrians. 2. Hiketeans by Philo, in the superscription to the -Treatise on contemplative life. 3. Ossenes or Ossens, by Epiphanius. -And 4, Baithusians in the Talmud, and by several Rabbins. As this -notion, which has been advanced by De Rossi three centuries and a half -ago, has already been refuted, it would be needless to repeat the -arguments here. - -1825.—Neander, whose first instalment of his gigantic Church History -appeared in 1825, now began to grapple with this mysterious -brotherhood. In the introductory chapter of this history, in which a -description is given of the religious condition of the world at the -advent of Christ, he gives a very brief but very pregnant sketch of the -Essenes. With that deep penetration, which was one of the chief -characteristics of this sagacious critic, he repudiates the notion that -the Essenes originated under foreign influences, and maintains that “it -is a gross error to infer from the resemblance of certain religious -phenomena the relationship of which is to be traced to a common inward -cause, inherent in the nature of the human mind, that they have an -external origin, having been copied from the other.” Hence, he submits -that Essenism arose out of the deeper religious meaning of the Old -Testament, that it afterwards adopted some of the old Oriental, Parsee, -and Chaldean notions, and that it had no Alexandrian elements. Neander -moreover most justly cautions against the accounts of Philo and -Josephus, saying that they clothed the opinions of the Essenes in a -garb peculiarly Grecian, which we might rightly consider as not -originally belonging to them. [84] - -1829.—The difficulty which perplexed Christian writers, arising from -the fact that the Essenes are not mentioned in the New Testament, did -not affect Jewish writers, although it is true that this name is also -not to be found in the ancient Jewish writings. For if it be granted -that this appellation is a corruption of an Aramaic word, the Essenes -must be looked for in the Talmud and Midrashim, which are chiefly -written in Aramaic, under their original designation whatever that -might be. The clue to it must, of course, be the identity of the -features ascribed to them by Philo and Josephus and those ascribed in -the ancient Jewish volumes to any order of Judaism. To this task -Rappaport, the corypheus of Jewish critics, betook himself. Knowing -that the Essenes were no distinct sect, in the strict sense of the -word, but simply an order of Judaism, and that there never was a -rupture between them and the rest of the Jewish community, Rappaport -most justly does not expect that they would be spoken of under a fixed -denominational name. He therefore rejects De Rossi’s notion that the -Baithusians, so frequently denounced in the Talmud and Midrashim, are -the Essenes described by Philo and Josephus, and sought to identify -them by their peculiar practices, expecting to find that they would be -spoken of by different names. He soon found that what Philo and -Josephus describe as peculiarities of the Essenes tallies with what the -Mishna, the Talmud, and the Midrashim record of the Chassidim -(חסדים), and that they are most probably the so-called old believers -(ותיקין), who are also described in the Talmud as the holy community -in Jerusalem (קהלא קדישא דבירושלים). He rightly recognised in them an -intensified form of Pharisaism, and remarks that what is said in the -Mishna about the moderation observed in eating and drinking, the great -humility, endurance under sufferings, zeal for everything that is holy, -community of goods, &c, refers to this holy community, or the Essenes. -He also quotes the following remark from the Midrash Coheleth, on -Eccles. ix, 9, about this holy community; “Rabi repeated from the -traditions of the holy community (עדה קדושה) ‘acquire a trade in -connection with the study of the Scriptures, &c.’—[Query] ‘Why are they -called holy community?’ [Reply] ‘Because they divided the day into -three divisions—devoting one-third to the study of the Scriptures, -another to prayer, and the third to work. Some say that they devoted -the whole of the winter to studying the Scriptures and the summer to -work.’” He, too, was the first who pointed out that the prayer which -Josephus tells us the Essenes offered up at the rising of the sun, is -the national hymn of praise, which still constitutes a part of the -Jewish daily service, and is as follows:— - - - He in mercy causes His light to shine upon the earth and upon the - inhabitants thereof; and in His goodness unfailingly renews every - day the work of creation. How numerous are Thy works, O Lord! Thou - hast made them all in wisdom; the earth is full of Thy possessions. - O King, Thou only art the exalted one from everlasting, the praised - and glorified and extolled since the days of yore! Lord of the - universe, in Thy great mercy have mercy upon us! Lord our might, - fortress of our strength, shield of our salvation, defend us! O - Lord, be Thou praised, Thou great in wisdom, who hast ordained and - created the rays of the sun: the Infinitely Good has formed a - glorious testimony for His name. He surrounded His majesty with - luminaries. The chiefs of His heavenly hosts are holy beings; they - glorify the Almighty; they continually declare the glory of God and - his holiness. Blessed be the Lord our God, for the excellency of - the works of Thy hands, and for the shining luminaries which Thou - hast. They shall glorify Thee for ever. - - God, the Lord of all created things, is praised and blessed in the - mouths of all the living. His power and goodness fill the universe; - wisdom and intelligence are round about Him. He exalts himself - above the angels, and beams in glory upon his chariot-throne. - Interceding goodness and rectitude are before His throne, - loving-kindness and mercy before his majesty. Benign are the - luminaries which our God has created. He has formed them in wisdom, - intelligence, and understanding; He has endowed them with power and - strength, to bear rule in the midst of the world. Filled with - splendour and brightness, their glory illuminates all the world; - rejoicing in rising and joyous in setting they perform with awe the - will of their Creator. They give praise and glory to His name, joy - and song to the memory of His kingdom. He called the sun, and light - rose; He saw and shaped the form of the moon. Praise Him all ye - heavenly hosts; ascribe glory and majesty to Him ye seraphim, - ophanim, and holy angels. - - -These, as Rappaport rightly remarks, are some of the remains of the -ancient prayer used by the Essenes. It will be seen that these hymns of -praise contain not only thanksgiving for the renewal of the light, to -which Josephus refers, but they also refer to the mysterious cosmogony -(מעשה בראשית) and theosophy (מעשה מרכבה), as well as to the angels -which played such an important part among this brotherhood. [85] - -1835.—The difficulty of reading Rabbinical Hebrew in which Rappaport’s -profound remarks are written, must have prevented Gfrörer from seeing -what this erudite Jewish critic had written on the Essenes; for, -although the second edition of vol. i. part 11 of his Critical History -of Primitive Christianity, containing an account of the Essenes, -appeared in 1835, yet he positively states “that the Essenes and the -Therapeutae are the same sect and hold the same views” (p. 299). -According to him, the development of Essenism is as follows. In the -third century before Christ, the Jews in Alexandria formed societies -according to the Pythagorean model, and thus originated the sect called -the Therapeutae, from these Egyptian Therapeutae again Essenism -developed itself in Palestine about 130 B.C. Hence Essenism is the -channel through which the Alexandrian theosophy was first transplanted -into Palestinian soil. The reason why the Essenes kept their doctrines -secret is that the Palestinian priests were hostile to this foreign -importation, and persecuted those who received this contraband. -Accordingly, the relationship of Pythagorism, Therapeutism and -Essenism, to use Gfrörer’s own figure, is that of grandmother, mother -and daughter. “So perfect is the agreement between the Therapeutae and -the Essenes, that it even extends to their names. For the word Ἐσσαῖνς -according to the most correct etymology, is derived from the -Syro-Chaldaic verb אסא which denotes to cure, to nurse, and hence is -nothing but a literal translation of θεραπευτὴς.” [86] - -1843.—Similar in spirit is the elaborate article on the Essenes in -Ersch und Gruber’s Cyclopœdia, written by Dähne, who maintains that -“Essenism is the produce of the Jewish-Alexandrian philosophy, and that -it is only when viewed from this stand-point that the deviations from -the rest of their Jewish co-religionists, and their peculiar -institutions, doctrines, and precepts appear in the clearest light.” It -is not surprising that holding such an opinion Dähne should feel -perplexed to account for the existence of this thoroughly -Jewish-Alexandrian order, as he makes the Essenes to be, in the very -heart of Palestine. All that he can say upon this subject is, that they -somehow got there in the middle of the second century before Christ. -The affiliation of Essenism to the Jewish-Alexandrian philosophy brings -it into most intimate relationship with Therapeutism, and necessarily -devolves upon Dähne to define this family connection which he does in -the following manner. [87] “The difference between the Therapeutae and -the Essenes, both of whom are followers of the Jewish-Alexandrian moral -philosophy, is that the former devoted themselves entirely to a -contemplative life, whilst the latter gave themselves more especially -to a practical life. Hence though both rest upon the same foundation, -the Therapeutae gave themselves up absolutely to the highest aim of -man, as they marked it out, the contemplation of God; whilst the -Essenes to some extent voluntarily lingered in the outer court of the -Holy of Holies, placed themselves intentionally for the good of the -brethren in more frequent contact with the world than the requirements -of nature demanded, thereby generously, but certainly -unphilosophically, temporarily retarding their own highest perfection -and happiness.” Like De Rossi, Bellermann, Gfrörer and others, Dähne -derives the name from the Chaldee אסא to heal, and says “accordingly -the term Essenes denotes spiritual physicians, or men who strive in the -highest sense to lead back the spirit to its natural (i.e. truly -divine) character and activity.” [88] - -1846.—A new epoch began in the history of the Essenes with the -investigation of Frankel on this subject, which appeared in his -Zeitschrift für die religiözen Interesse des Judenthums, 1846. Taking -up the idea of Rappaport, that the Essenes must be looked for in the -body of the Jews and not as a separate sect, Frankel refers to the fact -that, whilst the Assideans = Chassidim are referred to in 1 Macc. ii. -24; 2 Macc. xiv. 6, &c., the Perushim = Pharisees are never mentioned, -to show that no such marked and denominational divisions existed at -first in the community, and rightly remarks, that it “is only after a -longer development that sects appear in their separation, and sharply -defined features, when that which originally formed a united whole is -now divided and parted into various branches. And even this partition -and separation only shew themselves to the analysing mind, and -especially when the analysis is conducted after a foreign fashion, as -Josephus has done it, who reduced the Jewish sects into Greek schools, -and made the Essenes correspond to the Pythagoreans. But in reality -even these divisions flow one into another, and do not stand in -opposition to one another, but are simply to be distinguished by their -different shades of colour, and by the greater stringency or laxity -with which the same rules are regarded, so that they do not form -separate sects, but some individuals keep to these rules with greater -anxiety, whilst others, though considering them as binding, do not -regard them as having such a wide application. Now in early times there -were only Essenes = Chassidim (חסדים), the name of Perush = Pharisee -(פרוש) was not as yet known; it was only afterwards when in -succeeding periods some became more rigid in their manner of life and -views of religion, that the name Pharisees (פרושים) appears to denote -the less strict Jews, whilst the others were in a special degree -denominated by the old, respectable appellation Chassidim = Essenes -(חסדים).” This, Frankel corroborates by showing most clearly that -many of the vital principles which Josephus describes as peculiar to -Essenism, are at the very basis of Pharisaism, and that the Essenes are -frequently mentioned in the Mishna, Talmud, and Midrashim by the names -חסדים הראשונים the original Assideans = Chassidim, חברים the -associates, ותיקין those who have enfeebled their bodies through much -study; דבירושלים the retired ones; צנועין קהלא קדישא the holy -congregation in Jerusalem; טובלי שחרית hemerobaptists. Frankel -concluded his essay with the promise to return to this subject on some -future occasion. [89] - -1847.—Within twelve months of the publication of Frankel’s elaborate -Essay, an article appeared in the American Quarterly entitled The -Biblical Repository. As there was not sufficient time for this German -production to become known in the New World, Mr. Hall, the writer of -the article, could not avail himself of it, and was therefore obliged -to derive his information from the writings of Dr. Neander. But though -Mr. Hall has thrown no light on the Essenes, yet his reflections upon -their moral character and their connection with Christianity are so -just, sensible and candid, that we subjoin them to show that good -Christians may honestly acknowledge the good in Essenism without -detracting from Christianity. - - - “Let us give the Essene credit for all that he was as a worshipper - of the true God, and as a man striving after moral purity in a - corrupt age. The Gospel that breathed new life into the higher - nature of man, can afford to allow all his virtues. We know that - the Spirit of Christ opens the eye to the excellencies of others. - Truth rejoices in truth, and as all truth is from the same source, - the lustre of one development can never be increased by hiding the - glory of another. We would not enhance the necessity of our Lord’s - appearance by depreciating the moral condition of mankind at that - period. Those ascetic Jews deserve well of mankind for the light - they gave out in a dark age. We admire the humanity and justice of - their principles; their disapproval of war and slavery in the midst - of a world lying in wickedness, and the noble example of industry, - frugality and moderation in the things of this life they set before - all. We honour their honest endeavours to combine the vita - contemplativa and the vita activa,—to escape the bondage of the - senses, to maintain the supremacy of the spirit, and to unite - themselves with the Highest. But in all these respects, they are - only the true children of monotheism, the legitimate offspring of - the Jewish theocracy. They could have sprung up nowhere else. In - the phenomenon of the Essenes let us therefore adore the provident - wisdom of Jehovah, and recognize the secret working of his love in - carrying forward the great, eternal economy of salvation. They - exerted an influence on their age which helped to pave the way for - the Christ. Conscience spoke, and was spoken to, through them; and - the dying sense of virtue was kept alive. Thus were they stars - which emitted an humble though useful light before, but grew pale - and became invisible after, the coming of the Sun of - Righteousness.” [90] - - -1852.—Though Ewald published the second edition of the fourth volume of -his Jewish History in 1852, when Frankel’s Essay had been six years -before the literary world, yet he manifests total ignorance of it in -his account of the Essenes, contained in this volume. Still, this -profound and merciless critic, without having access to the Jewish -information gathered from the Talmud and Midrashim, saw that Essenism -was no Greek plant transplanted into Palestine, but like Pharisaism -grew out of the Chassidim. He remarks that “people who left the great -community in order to lead a specially holy life, with the permission -and under the direction of the law, were to be found in Israel from the -remotest times, yet in its first form there were only the Nazarites, of -whom each one lived for himself; and in the second, the Rechabites -combined themselves already into a larger union; but now the whole -conscience of the people itself, as it were, departed into solitude -with numerous Essenes. For it cannot be denied that they, proceeding -from the Chassidim, represent the direct and legitimate development of -Judaism in the form which became the ruling one since Ezra.” “Their new -features and endeavours merely consisted in their intensely earnest and -rigorous application of the demands of the law, as understood and -interpreted since Ezra. Finding that the rigorous and logical -application of these laws was impossible in the great community, -especially in that community as regulated by the Pharisees, they -preferred to congregate and live in solitude.” [91] Very unfortunate is -Ewald’s derivation of Essene from the Rabbinic חזן servant (of God), -and the assertion that this name was given to them because it was their -only desire to be θεραπευταὶ θεοῦ. - -1853.—Nearly seven years had now elapsed since Frankel published his -masterly Essay on the Essenes, and promised to return to this subject -at some future time. True to his promise, he now gave another elaborate -treatise, in which he substantiated, by numerous quotations from the -Talmud, his former conclusions, that the Essenes are the offspring of -Judaism, that they are nothing but stationary, or more correctly -speaking consequential Chassidim, that they were therefore not so far -distant from the Pharisees as to be regarded as a separate sect, but, -on the contrary, that they formed a branch of Pharisaism. [92] - -1856.—So convincing was Frankel’s Treatise, that Graetz, who published -the third volume of his masterly History of the Jews in 1856, in which -he gives an elaborate account of this brotherhood, remarks: [93] “I -completely accept these results about this sect being based upon -critical investigation, and shall only add a few supplementary points -by way of illustration.” [94] The additions consist of a very able -analysis of Philo’s reputed Treatise entitled De Vita Contemplativa, -showing that it is spurious, and of an attempt to show that the Essenes -were perpetual Nazarites (נזירי עולם). His remarks are as -follow—“There were great masses of Nazarites in the post-exile period -(Tosifta Nasir, c. iv.; Babbi Berachoth, 48 a; 1 Macc. ii. 49; Joseph. -Antiq. xviii. vi.), but they were of a different character to those of -the Biblical period; they were Nazarites for the whole life (Nasir 4 -a.) The Mishna presupposed their existence; the magical in Nazaritism, -which was connected with the growing of the hair in the Nazarites of -the Bible, gradually recedes into the back ground or loses its -significance altogether; whereas the Levitical, the guarding against -defilement, appears more and more in the foreground among the life-long -Nazarites. The Essenes then were such Nazarites as represented in -private life the highest priestly consecration. The connection between -the Nazarites and Essenes has already been indicated in obscure -passages in the Talmud, that one consecrated himself to be a perpetual -Nazarite if he simply wished to be a Nazarite in order that he might be -able to preserve the secrets of disgraceful family circumstances. -(Tosifta Nasir, b. i. 6; Kidushim 71 a.) [95] - -1857.—The learned historian Jost, who published the first volume of his -History of Judaism in 1857, was also perfectly convinced by the results -of Frankel’s researches, and made them the basis of his excellent -description of the Essenes, in which he maintains that they grew out of -Pharisaism or from the ancient Chassidim. “The Essenes,” he submits, -“are exactly the same that the other Rabbis wished to be who -endeavoured to practise the Levitical law of purity, as leading to -higher consecration. They have neither another creed nor another law, -but simply institutions peculiar to this brotherhood, and endeavour to -reach the highest consecration by their manner of life, in defining the -different stages, according to preliminary exercises and certain years -of preparation. Their views and tenets are therefore also to be found -in the utterances of the learned and the Rabbis who did not enter their -order, so that they did not look upon the Essenes as opponents or -apostates, but, on the contrary, as holding the same opinions with -increased claims and some fewer enjoyments, whom many out of their own -midst joined, and who were called Chassidim or Zenuim.” [96] - -1857.—The comparatively few and unessential deviations from Judaism to -be found in Essenism were, however, more than Herzfeld could tolerate, -without characterising the innovators as heretics and smugglers of -contraband opinions. Dissatisfied with the modern researches of Frankel -and Graetz on this subject, this learned historian, and chief Rabbi of -Brunswick, returned to the old notion of De Rossi, that the Essenes of -Josephus and Philo are identical with the Baithusians mentioned in the -Talmud. Still he thinks that De Rossi’s opinion “must be better proved -than he had done it,” and therefore remarks—“first of all, seeing that -the prefixed בית denotes school or sect in the appellations -Beth-Shammai, Beth-Hillel; that בית הכותים in Tosifta Helem ii. b, -and בי כותאי in Chullin 6 a, denotes the sect or the land of Cuttim; -and then that בית סין stands twice Tosifta Succa, cap. iii., and -Tosifta Menachoth cap. x. for Baithusians, can it mean anything else -than house or sect of Essenes? When אסי physician became the name of -a sect, an Essene could not so well be called אסי without ambiguity; -he was therefore described as one of בית אסי.” [97] Thus much for the -origin of the name, and now let us hear Dr. Herzfeld’s theory about the -brotherhood itself. It is simply this [98]—“A Jew, who became -acquainted with the allegorical exegesis prevalent among the -Alexandrian Jews, and with its mother the Greek wisdom, but who, like -Pythagoras, Plato and Herodotus, had also found an opportunity to learn -some things from Egyptian priests, conceived and carried out the plan, -eclectically to form from it and from Judaism a speculative and ascetic -system, as well as to organise, according to its model, a sect from the -Jewish ascetics.” [99] This Alexandrianized Palestinian Jew founded the -order of the Essenes in Palestine about 230 B.C. - -1857.—Another effort was made in this year to explain the origin of -this mysterious brotherhood. Professor Hilgenfeld of Jena, who -maintains their genuine Jewish origin, starts the notion that the -Essenes belonged to the Apocalytical school, and that they must be -regarded as the successors of the ancient prophets, and as constituting -the prophetic school. It is only when we view them from this stand -point that their precepts and practices can be understood, and that the -high antiquity ascribed to them by Josephus (Antiq. xviii. 1, 2) and -Pliny (Hist. Nat. v. 17), can be comprehended. This he moreover assures -us gives the clue to the explanation of their name. The Hebrew prophets -were also called חזים seers, which, being in the Aramaic -pronunciation חזין, easily gave rise through Greek change of vowels -to the name Ἐσσαῖου, Ἐσσηνοί. Hilgenfeld manifests an almost -inexcusable ignorance of the labours of Frankel and Graetz on the -Essenes. [100] - -1860.—A necessarily brief but interesting article on the Essenes, -written by the able Mr. Westcott, appeared in Smith’s Dictionary of the -Bible. The writer wisely availed himself of the labours of Frankel and -Jost, and properly traced the origin of the brotherhood to the -Chassidim. His fear, however, lest any shining virtues in the Essenes -might be thought by some to pale some of the brightness of the Sun of -Righteousness, prevented him from appreciating the true character of -this order, as well as from seeing that they paved the way to -Christianity. - -1863.—Graetz again, in the second edition of the third volume of his -History of the Jews, in which he has an additional chapter on the Rise -and Progress of Christianity, goes to the other extreme, and maintains -that “Jesus simply appropriated to himself the essential features of -Essenism,” [101] and that primitive Christianity was nothing but an -offshoot from Essenism. - -1862.—Of the article on the Essenes in Dr. Alexander’s valuable edition -of Kitto’s Cyclopædia of Biblical Literature, being written by me, I -can do no more than say that it embodies the substance of this Essay. - -1863.—The description of the Essenes in the new edition of Dean -Milman’s History of the Jews, gives a very imperfect idea both of the -development and morality of this brotherhood. [102] The learned Dean -seems to be wholly unacquainted with the researches of Frankel and -Graetz on this subject. He, however, rightly rejects the notion that -Essenism had its origin in Pythagorism. - - - -1847.—After the above was printed, I found a notice of the Essenes in -Hirschfeld’s work on the Hagadic Exegesis, in which he submits that the -name Essene may be derived from the Greek ἦθος manners, morality, -virtue, that though the Essenes had several things in common with the -Therapeutae, yet there was a great difference between the two sects, -and that the former rested more on the Bible and on Judaism. Still he -affirms that “some Neo-Platonic, Pythagorean and Persian ideas found -their way among the Essenes, and brought with them some practices and -institutions which this brotherhood mixed up with the Jewish views of -religion, and amongst which are to be classed their extension of the -laws of purification, &c.” Hirschfeld, moreover, maintains that, “like -the Alexandrians, but only from a different standpoint, the Essenes -aimed to reconcile religion with science.” As this opinion has already -been discussed in this Essay, it is needless to repeat the objections -against it. [103] - - - - - - - - -NOTES - - -[1] According to tradition there were four degrees of purity. 1. The -ordinary purity required of every worshipper in the temple (טהרת -חולין). 2. The higher degree of purity necessary for eating of the -heave-offering (טהרת תרומה). 3. The still higher degree requisite for -partaking of the sacrifices (טהרת הקודש). And 4. The degree of purity -required of those who sprinkle the water absolving from sin (טהרת -חטאת). Each degree of purity required a greater separation from the -impurities described in Leviticus xi, 24–xv, 28. These impure subjects -were termed the fathers of impurity; that which was touched by them was -designated the first generation of impurity; what was touched by this -again, was called the second generation of impurity; and so on. Now, -heave-offerings—the second degree of holiness—became impure when -touched by the third generation; the flesh of sacrifices—the third -degree of holiness—when coming in contact with the fourth generation; -and so on. These degrees of purity had even to be separated from each -other; because the lower degree was, in respect to the higher one, -regarded as impure, and any one who lived according to a higher degree -of purity became impure by touching one who lived according to a lower -degree, and could only regain his purity by lustrations (טבילה). The -first degree was obligatory upon every one, the other grades were -voluntary. Before partaking of the heave-offering, the washing of hands -was required; and before eating of the flesh of sacrifices, immersion -of the whole body was required—Comp. Babylonian Talmud, Tract Chagiga, -18 b. - -[2] Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. iii, part ii, p. 583 ff. - -[3] The figures before each point of comparison do not exit in the -original German; I have inserted them in the translation in order to -facilitate the references to these different points of comparison. - -[4] Comp. Diog. Laert. de Vitis Philosophorum, lib. viii. Vit. -Pythagor. xii. It is true that Cicero represents Cotta as giving no -credit to this story, because, as he apprehends, Pythagoras never -offered animal sacrifices (De Natura Deorum, lib. iii. cap. xxxvi.), -but it is also related by Athenaeus (Deipnosoph. lib. x.), Plutarch and -others. - -[5] An excellent account of the Pythagorean system is given by Zeller, -Geschichte der Philosophie. Erster Theil, Tübingen, 1856, pp. 206–365; -Grote, History of Greece, vol. iv. London, 1857, pp. 527–553; and -Mason, in Smith’s Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and -Mythology, Article Pythagoras. - -[6] R. Nathan, the Babylonian as he is called, was Vice-President of -the College in Palestine, under the Presidency of Simon III. b. -Gamaliel II. A.D. 140. The above-quoted work of which he is the reputed -author, as indicated by its title, אבות דרבי נתן i.e. the Aboth of R. -Nathan, is a compilation of the apothegms and moral sayings of the -Jewish fathers (אבות), interspersed with traditional explanations of -divers texts of Scripture, consisting of forty-one chapters. Both the -historian and moral philosopher will find this work an important -contribution to the literary and philosophical history of antiquity. It -is printed in the different editions of the Talmud, and has also been -published separately with various commentaries, in Venice, 1622: -Amsterdam, 1778, &c., &c.; and a Latin translation of it was published -by our learned countryman, Francis Taylor, under the title of R. -Nathanis Tractatus de Patribus, latine cum Notis. London, 1654, 4to. -Comp. Zunz, Die gottesdienstlichen Vorträge der Juden. Berlin, 1832, -p.p. 108, 109; Fürst, Kultur- und Literaturgeschichte der Juden in -Asien. Leipzig, 1849, p. 16 ff; by the same author, Bibliotheca -Judaica, volume iii. Leipzig, 1863, p. 19 ff; Steinschneider, Catalogus -Libr. Hebr. in Bibliotheca Bodleiana col. 2,032 ff. - -[7] For the passages embodying the sentiments of the Essenes, which -constitute the above comparisons, we must refer to the second part of -this Essay and the notes. - -[8] Compare the account of Philo, p. 36; Pliny, p. 40; Josephus, p. 52; -in the second part of this Essay. - -[9] This prophecy is given in full in the second part of this Essay, p. -50. - -[10] Zeitschrift für die religiösen Interessen des Judenthums. Berlin, -1856, p. 449. - -[11] Geschichte des Judenthums und seiner Secten, vol. 1, Leipzig, -1857, p. 207. - -[12] As Mr. Westcott, the writer of the article Essenes in Smith’s -Dictionary of the Bible, has misunderstood this passage and wrongly -represented Jost himself as deriving this name from חשאין the silent, -the mysterious, we give Jost’s own words:—“Uns will scheinen, dass -Josephus den Namen allerdings von חשא schweigen, geheimnissvoll sein, -ableitet; dahin führt seine Uebertragung des Wortes חשן in die -griechischen Buchstaben ἐσσην Ed. Hav. Ant. 1, 147, welches Wort die -LXX λογεῖον übersetzen. Da das Wort חשאין seinen Zeitgenossen sehr -geläufig war, so konnte er annehmen, dass man sich unter dem Namen der -Sekte einen angemessenen Begriff dachte und er keiner Erläuterung -bedürfe. Ja, es wäre möglich, dass er den Begriff aus חשן selbst -ableitet, und auf λογεῖον oder λογίον, als mit Weissagung begabte, -zurückführte. Vergleichte Gfrörer, Philo 1, 196.” - -[13] Aboth di. R. Nathan, cap. xxxvi. - -[14] Comp. Epiphan. Haeres. xix. lib. i. tom. ii. sect. 4, p. 120, ed. -Petav. - -[15] Comp. Petite Variae Lectiones, c. xxviii. p. 2600. - -[16] Josippon b. Gorion also called Gorionides, lived in Italy about -the middle of the tenth century. He is the compiler of the celebrated -Hebrew Chronicle called Josippon, or the Hebrew Josephus. His real -character and the value of his Chronicle are discussed under the -article Jossippon in Dr. Alexander’s edition of Kitto’s Cyclopædia of -Biblical Literature. - -[17] De Rossi, also called Asarja min Ha-Adomim, was born at Mantua in -1513, and died 1577. For an account of this eminent Jewish scholar, who -may be regarded as the father of Biblical criticism at the time of the -Reformation, see Dr. Alexander’s edition of Kitto’s Cyclopædia of -Biblical Literature, Article Rossi. - -[18] Salmas. Plinian. exercitat. in Solinum cap. xxxv. p. 432, edit. -Ultraject. - -[19] Comp. Graetz, Geschichte der Juden. Dritter Band, Zweite Auflage, -Leipzig. 1863, p. 464, &c.; Frankel, Programm des jüdisch-theol. -Seminars von 1854. - -[20] Comp. Philonis Opera, ed. Mangey. London, 1742, vol. ii pp. -457–45. - -[21] Josephus, who also mentions this fact, distinctly says that their -not offering sacrifices in the temple is owing to the different degree -of holiness which they practised. (Vide infra p. 228.) From the -repeated declarations in the Bible, that a life of uniform obedience -and faithful service is far more acceptable to God than the cattle of a -thousand hills (1 Sam. xv. 22; Ps. xl. 7; l. 7–14; li. 17; Prov. xxxi. -3; Isa. i. 11, 17; lxv. 3; Jer. vii. 21–23; Hos. vi. 6; xiv. 3; Micah, -vi. 6–8), the Essenes could easily be reconciled to their abstaining -from offering animal sacrifices, and would be led to attach infinitely -greater importance to the presenting of their bodies a living -sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God. (Comp. also Rom. xii. 1). This -circumstance led Petitius to the conclusion that Herod, who was -friendly to the Essenes in consequence of the favorable prophecy about -him uttered by the Essene Menahem (vide infra p. 50), employed them to -translate the Prophets and the Psalms into Greek, and that they availed -themselves of the opportunity to introduce their tenets and rites into -this version, now called the Septuagint. Thus, for instance, when David -said “Sacrifice and burnt offering thou didst not desire, mine ears -hast thou opened” (Ps. xl. 6), the Essenes rendered it “Sacrifice and -burnt offering thou dost not desire, but a body hast thou prepared me,” -interpolating three of their tenets. 1. They made the Prophet speak -absolutely, as if God had entirely rejected sacrifices because they -would offer him none. 2. By dropping the words, “mine ears hast thou -opened,” they showed their disapprobation of slavery. (Comp. Exod. -xxi). And 3, by substituting “a body hast thou prepared me,” they -understood the college of devout Essenes, who met together as a body, -and whom God appointed instead of sacrifice. Comp. Basnage, History of -the Jews, English translation. London, 1708, p. 128. - -[22] This is not the only reason why the Essenes withdrew from cities. -Their observance of the Levitical laws of purity which rendered them -impure when they came in contact with those who did not live according -to the same rules, was the principal cause of their living separately. -(Vide supra p. 7, note 1.) Philo, however, states the first reason -because the Greeks, for whom he wrote, understood it better than the -second, which is so peculiarly Jewish in its character. - -[23] The same thing Christ urged on his disciples. Comp. Matth. vi. -19–21. - -[24] This simple desire for the supply of our daily bread, and the -contentment of mind here spoken of, are also commended by our Saviour. -(Matth. vi. 11, 25–34.) - -[25] Believing that all they that take the sword shall perish with the -sword, Comp. Matth. xxvi. 52. - -[26] The Apostle Paul, too, admonished the Colossians to “beware lest -any man spoil you through philosophy.” (Col. ii. 8.) - -[27] Thus also Christ, when he was asked which was the greatest -commandment in the law, declared, love to God and love to our -neighbour, and that on these two hang all the law and the prophets. -(Comp. Matth. xxii. 36–40.) - -[28] Although the taking of oaths was discountenanced by the Jews -generally (Comp. Ecclus. xxiii 11, &c.; and especially Philo De decem -oraculis § 17, Opp. Tom. ii. p. 194, &c., ed. Mangey); and the -Pharisees took great care to abstain as much as possible from using -them (Comp. Shevuoth 39, b; Gittin 35, a; Bemidbar Rabba c. xxii); yet -the Essenes were the only order who laid it down as a principle not to -swear at all, but to say yea, yea, and nay, nay. So firmly and -conscientiously did they adhere to it that Herod, who on ascending the -throne had exacted an oath of allegiance from all the rest of the Jews, -was obliged to absolve the Essenes from it. (Comp. Joseph. Antiq. book -xv. chap. x. § 4). Christ too, laid it down as a principle for his -disciples not to swear at all, but to say yea, yea, and nay, nay. -(Comp. Matth. v. 38–37.) - -[29] This community of goods was also adopted by the early Christians, -who, as we are told, “sold their possessions and goods, and parted them -to all as every man needed.”—(Comp. Acts, ii. 45, iv. 34, 35.) - -[30] The account here given of the sufferings of the Essenes bears a -very striking resemblance to the description in the Epistle to the -Hebrews xi. 36–38; and it may be that the Apostle refers to this -extraordinary brotherhood. - -[31] This fragment which Eusebius has preserved is given in Philo’s -Works, ed. Mangey, vol. ii., p. 622, seq. - -[32] The tracing of this brotherhood to Moses is in accordance with the -practice which generally prevailed among the Jews of ascribing the -origin of every law, mystical doctrine or system, which came into vogue -in the course of time, either to Ezra, Moses, Noah or Adam. Thus we are -told in the Jerusalem Talmud (Pea, ii. 6), and the Midrash (Coheleth, -96 d.), that all the Scriptural learning which developed itself in -course of time, and everything which a Talmid Vatic might bring to -light, were revealed to Moses beforehand on Mount Sinai. - -[33] This refers to juvenile members of the fraternity, as the Essenes -did adopt children, and trained them up to the practices of the order. -Vide infra p. 41. - -[34] The four companies here mentioned most probably refer to the four -different classes into which the Essenes were divided, described more -minutely by Josephus. Vide infra, p. 47, note 45. - -[35] So also the Apostle Paul recommends us not to be slothful in -business, but fervent in spirit, serving the Lord.—(Rom. xii, 11.) - -[36] That is if he belongs to the class of Essenes who practised -celibacy; for there were those among them who had wives and families. -Vide infra p. 49. - -[37] The Mosaic law regards conjugal intercourse as polluting, and -enjoins bathing after it (Levit. xv. 18.) Hence, when the children of -Israel had to sanctify themselves in the highest degree, so as to be -fit to receive the law from Mount Sinai, they were commanded not to -approach their wives (Exod. xix. 15). Hence, also, those who had the -charge of the shew-bread polluted the sacred loaves by going to their -wives (1 Sam. xxi. 4). And hence the remark of the Apostle Paul, that -in order to give themselves to fasting and prayer, man and wife may -keep aloof from each other by mutual consent (1 Cor. vii. 5). The same -laws obtained among all nations of antiquity. Thus, among the -Egyptians, Babylonians, Arabians, Greeks and Romans, both man and wife -had to bathe after connubial intercourse (Herod., i. 198). No one was -allowed to go after it to the temple without bathing (Herod., ii. 64; -Suet. Aug. xciv. 5; Pers. ii. 50, &c.); and the priests had to abstain -from approaching their wives when they were ministering in holy things -(Porphyrius, de Abstinentia, lib. ii. 50; iv. 7; Plutarch. Sympos. iii. -6; Tibul. lib. ii. Eleg. 1, 11, &c.; Ovid. Metam. x. 434, &c.) Now, as -the Essenes strove to be in a perpetual state of sanctification, -regarded their refectory as a sanctuary and their meals as sacraments, -and most anxiously avoided contact with every thing that defiled, they -had of necessity to extend these Mosaic laws, which enjoin abstinence -from connubial intercourse as a means of sanctification, and which -regard those who indulged in it as defiled, to the whole course of -their life; and they had therefore to be celibates. This extension of -the Mosaic law was moreover deemed desirable in consequence of the -general conviction which the Jews entertained, in common with other -nations, that no woman remains faithful to her husband, and that they -all defile the bed of marriage. Philo, in the passage before us, and -Josephus, as we shall see afterwards (vide infra p. 41, § 2), only give -the latter reason, to suit their Greek readers who could both -understand it better and sympathise with it more than with the former. - -[38] This is simply a repetition of what the Essenes themselves said -about their origin, in accordance with a common practice among the -Jews.—Vide supra p. 36, note 14. - -[39] This representation of the three Jewish sects as different -philosophical schools, and the supposed resemblance of the Essenes to -the Pythagoreans, which he mentions afterwards, (vide infra Antiq. xv. -10; § 4, p. 50) and which have misled modern writers, are nothing but a -desire on the part of Josephus to make the divers teachings of his -co-religionists correspond to the different systems of Greek -philosophy. It is this anxiety to shew the Gentiles, for whom he wrote, -how much the Jews resemble them both in doctrine and practice, which -detracts from the merits of Josephus’ history. - -[40] This love for the brotherhood, which the Essenes possessed to so -extraordinary a degree, was also urged by the Evangelists and Apostles -on the early Christians (comp. John xiv. 17; Rom. xiii. 8; 1 Tim. iv. -9; 1 Peter i. 28; xi. 17; 1 John iii. 23; iv. 7, 11; v. 2). - -[41] This does not contradict Philo’s remark (vide supra p. 37), as -Herzfeld supposes, (Geschichte des Volkes Israel, vol. ii. p. 375); -since the two statements refer to two different things. The former -affirms that they do not receive children into the noviciate, whilst -the latter speaks of their adopting and educating them, which is a -distinct thing from becoming a novice. - -[42] Vide supra, p. 39, note 19. - -[43] So our Lord urged on the young man, who lived so exemplary a life -in the performance of God’s law, and whom he loved, that unless he gave -up his property he could not follow him (comp. Matth. xix. 21; Mark x. -21; Luke xviii. 22), and commanded his disciples to sell all their -possessions and distribute the money among the poor (comp. Luke xii. -33.) - -[44] Ointment being a luxury (comp. Eccl. ix. 8; Dan. x. 2), the -Essenes regarded the use of it as extravagance, and contrary to the -simplicity of their manner of life. - -[45] The manner in which Christ commanded his disciples to depart on -their journey (Mark vi. 8–10) is the same which these pious Essenes are -here said to have adopted. This also explains the injunction given by -our Saviour to his disciples in Luke xxii. 36, about taking arms with -them, which has so greatly perplexed commentators who were unacquainted -with the customs of the Essenes. - -[46] The Pharisees, too, had a steward in every place to supply the -needy with clothing and food. (Comp. Pea viii. 7; Baba Bathra 8 a; -Sabbath 118.) - -[47] Comp. also Luke x. 4, &c. - -[48] Some translate it “they offer prayer (εἰς τὸν ἥλιον) to the sun.” -But it is utterly inconceivable that the Essenes, who were such -thorough Jews, and so exemplary for their adoration of the Holy One of -Israel, would be guilty of idolatry by worshipping the sun. Besides, -the prayer in question is described as one transmitted by the fathers. -And can it be imagined that there existed among the Jews a national -prayer to this luminary in direct violation of the first commandment, -and of what is so expressly forbidden in Deut. iv. 10? The prayer -therefore here spoken of is the well known national morning hymn of -praise (המאיר לארץ) for the return of the light of the day, which -still forms a part or the Jewish service to the present day. Comp. -Berachoth 9 b; Rappaport in the Bikure Ha-Ittim, vol. x., Vienna 1829, -p. 115, and infra p. 69. - -[49] This practice of bathing before meals was also common among the -Pharisees (comp. Chagiga, 18, b), and as the Essenes covered themselves -with their aprons so the Pharisees put on their Talith during their -baptisms. (Comp. Berachoth 24, b.) - -[50] The Pharisees, too, regarded the refectory as a sanctuary, and -compared its table to the altar in the temple, because the altar in the -temple is represented as the table of the Lord (Ezekiel xli, 22). -Hence, R. Jochanan and R. Eleazar remark—“As long as the temple stood -the altar atoned for the sins of Israel, but now it is man’s table -which atones for his sins.” (Talmud Berachoth, 55a). Hence the Chaldee -paraphrase of Ezekiel xii. 22, and the remarks of Rashi and Kimchi on -this passage, which cannot be understood unless this traditional -interpretation is borne in mind. Comp. also Aboth iii, 3. - -[51] This was also the practice of the Pharisees, and is to the present -day the custom among the orthodox Jews. - -[52] This paragraph almost embodies the sentiments uttered by our -Saviour in Matth. chap. v. - -[53] These ancient books on magical cures and exorcisms were the -reputed works of Solomon, who, according to the Talmud as well as the -Byzantine and Arabian writers, composed treatises on miraculous cures -and driving out evil spirits. (Comp. Pesachim 56 a; Fabricius, Codex -pseudepigraphus Vet. Test. p. 1042, &c.; Weil, Biblische Legenden der -Muselmänner, p. 225–279). Josephus tells us elsewhere that some of -these Solomonic productions still existed in his own days, and that he -had actually seen demons driven out and people cured by their aid. -(Comp. Antiq. book viii. chap. ii. § 5.) This account most strikingly -illustrates what Christ says in Matth. xii. 27. - -[54] This custom has its origin in the extension of a Mosaic law. The -hosts of the Lord are commanded in Deut. xxiii 13, 15, to have spades -among the martial instruments in order to bury therewith their -excrements without the camp, and thus to keep themselves pure from -every pollution, and to be a holy camp, because the Holy One of Israel -dwells in the midst thereof. Now as the Essenes strove to be, in a -pre-eminent sense, the spiritual hosts of the Lord, every one of them -was obliged to have this spade in order to guard their sacred camp from -defilement. For this reason the apron was also given to cover their -nakedness in their numerous baptisms, and thus to keep their thoughts -from dwelling upon anything which might lead to impurity; whilst the -white garment was the symbol of their holiness. This, however, was not -peculiar to the Essenes, as the Talmud tells us that when any one -applied to become a member of the Pharisaic order (חבר), he had to -pass through a noviciate of twelve months, at the expiration of which -he received a sort of garment called כנפים, and having duly qualified -himself in this stage, he was afterwards admitted to the holier -lustrations (מקבלין לכנסּים ואחר כד מקבלין לטהרות). (Comp. Tosifta -Demai e. 11; Jerusalem Demai ii. 3; Babylonian Becharoth 30, 6). - -[55] This was the only occasion on which the Essenes were permitted to -take an oath. - -[56] This does not refer to governments generally, as Gfrörer will have -it (Philo und die jüdisch-alexandrinische Theosophie, vol. ii, p. 333, -&c.), but to the office of overseer or steward among the brotherhood, -as is evident from the immediately following statement, which most -unquestionably pledges every Essene to retain his simplicity of -character if he should ever attain to any official position or -stewardship in the order. - -[57] This is not peculiar to the Essenes. The Pharisees, too, would not -indiscriminately propound the mysteries of the cosmogony and the -theosophy, which, according to them, are contained in the history of -the Creation and in the vision of Ezekiel, except to those who were -regularly initiated in the order. Comp. Mishna Chagiga, ii, 1. - -[58] This evidently refers to the secrets of the Tetragrammaton, and -the angelology which played so important a part among the Jewish -mystics from time immemorial. Comp. Wisdom of Solomon vii. 20; Mishna -Chagiga, ii, 1. - -[59] The reason why he ate herbs and not bread, or the simple dish -which the order generally took, is that, being bound by an oath to -observe the practices of the brotherhood, he could only accept meals -from those who lived according to the highest degree of purity (על -טהרת חטאת), and who, as a matter of course, kept their meals according -to this degree. But as such a mode of life was of very uncommon -occurrence, the excommunicated Essene was obliged to live on herbs or -vegetables which he had to pluck himself; for, according to the Talmud, -plants are only then considered unclean when they are cut off and water -is poured upon them (משהוכשרו לקבל טומאה משנתלשו). As for Josephus’ -saying that he died a miserable death, and that he could only eat grass -(ποιηφάγων), this is simply another instance of his exaggerating and -colouring his subject. - -[60] The Pharisees, too, regarded ten persons as constituting a -complete number for divine worship, held the assembling of such a -number as sacred, and would not spit in their presence. (Comp. -Berâchoth 51 a; Jerusalem Berachoth iii. 5; Aboth iii. 6.) - -[61] This is not peculiar to the Essenes; for the Pharisees, too, would -not remove a vessel on the Sabbath (comp. Tosifta Succa, iii); and the -orthodox Jews, to the present day, will not even carry a handkerchief -on the Sabbath; they tie it round the body to serve as a girdle, so -that it might not be said that they carry the weight of even so small a -thing on the sacred day. Comp. also Mark xi, 16. - -[62] Neither is this peculiar to the Essenes; for not only did the -Pharisees of old do the same (comp. Ioma 28, a); but the orthodox Jews -of the present day wash after performing the duties of nature. - -[63] This division of the brotherhood into four classes, as well as the -impurity contracted by the higher class when touching one who belonged -to a lower class of purity, also existed among the Pharisees. (Vide -supra, p. 7, note 1.) - -[64] Philo, too, speaks of this fact. (Vide supra p. 36.) - -[65] This is another instance of the anxiety of Josephus to make the -different phases of Judaism harmonise with the Greek mode of thinking. - -[66] It is evident that Josephus, as an orthodox and pious Jew, cannot -mean by εἱμαρμένη the Fatum of the Stoics, which was above the deities; -but intends to convey thereby the idea of eternal counsels and -predestination spoken of in the Bible. Indeed, elsewhere Josephus tells -us distinctly that “the doctrine of the Essenes delights to leave all -things to God” (vide infra p. 52); so that that which is in the one -case ascribed to fate, is in the other ascribed to God. - -[67] No more regard is to be paid to this remark, that the Essenes are -like the Pythagoreans, than to the assertion which Josephus makes -afterwards that they are related in their manner of life to the -Polistae, (vide infra p. 53), as his aim was to shew how much the -Jewish sects resembled the Greek systems of philosophy. Comp. p. 41, -note 21. - -[68] The fact that Menahem saw Herod in Jerusalem, and that the Essene -Judah, as Josephus tells us elsewhere (comp. Jewish War, book i. chap. -iii. § 5; Antiq. book xiii. chap. xi. § 2), foretold in the temple the -death of Antigones, clearly shows that the Essenes did not at first -form a separate community, but lived together with the rest of their -Jewish brethren. - -[69] Pliny, whom Solinus copies, simply says that the Essenes live in -the society of palm-trees (socia palmarum), to form an antithesis with -the appellation a solitary community (sola gens); and this is perfectly -correct. But Solinus’ alteration of it into “palm-berries are their -food” (palmis victitant) is incorrect, inasmuch as they lived from the -cultivation of the land, bees, &c. - -[70] This is simply a reiteration of what Pliny says about the -antiquity of the Essenes. - -[71] This work of Josephus, addressed to the Greeks, is no longer -extant. - -[72] This is simply imaginary; the real reason for it was, that they -could not dig on the Sabbath the hole that was requisite for it -without, as they thought, violating the sanctity of the day, as to do -so was considered a labour. - -[73] This unjust remark about the Essenes, whose exemplary virtues and -self-denying life elicited the unqualified admiration of Jews, Greeks, -and Romans, is just what might be expected from the bigoted persecutor -of heretics, amongst whom he put no less a person than St. Chrysostom. - -[74] This name may be derived from the Hebrew Shemesh (שמש) sun, and -was most probably given to the Essenes, because of the erroneous notion -that they worshipped the sun. - -[75] The whole of this account is worse than useless, inasmuch as it -not only gives us no information whatever about this interesting order, -but is positively misleading. - -[76] Comp. Meor Enajim, edit. Mantua. 1547, fol. 88 b. - -[77] אנטיגנוס איש סוכו קבל משמעון הצדיק הוא היה אמר אל תהיו כעבדים -המשמשים את הרב על מנת לקבל פרס אלא היו כעברים המשמשים את הרב שלא על מנת -לקבל פרס ויהי מורא שמיס עליכם כדי שיהיה שכרכם כפול: לעתיד לבא: אנטיגנוס -איש סוכו היו לו שני תלמידים שהיו שונין בדבריו שונין היו לתלמידים -ותלמידים לתלמידיהם עמרו ודקדקו אחריהן ואמרו מה ראו אבותינו לומר אפשר -שיעשה פועל מלאכה כל היום ולא יטול שכרו ערבית אלא אילו יודעין אבותינו -שיש העולם (אחר) ויש תחיית המתים לא היו אומרים כך עמדו ופירשו מי התורה -ונפרצו מהם שתי פרצות צדוקים וביתוסין צדוקים על שום צדוק ביתוסין על שום -ביתוס שהיה משתמש בכלי זהב וכלי כסף כל ימיו לא היתה דעתו גסה עליו אלא -צדוקים אומרים מסורה בית פרושים שהן מצערין עצמן בעולם הזה ובעולם הבא אין -להם כלום - -[78] Comp. Moses and Aaron: Civil and Ecclesiastical Rites used by the -Ancient Hebrews, eighth edition (London, 1672), book i, chap, xii, p. -50–59. - -[79] The Court of the Gentiles. Pt. ii of “Philosophy,” Oxford, 1671, -p. 147, &c. - -[80] The Old and New Testaments Connected, seventeenth editions, vol. -iii. London, 1815, part ii, book v, p. 406–431. - -[81] The History of the Jews, from Jesus Christ to the present day. -London, 1708, p. 125–137. - -[82] Jewish Antiquities; or a Course of Lectures on the two first books -of Godwyn’s Moses and Aaron, ninth edition. London, 1837, book i., -chap. xii, p. 281–287. - -[83] Geschichtliche Nachrichten aus dem Alterthume über Essäer und -Therapeuten. Berlin, 1821. - -[84] General History of the Christian Religion and Church, English -Translation, Clark’s Theological Library, vol. i, Edinburgh, 1851, p. -58–66. - -[85] Rappaport, in the Hebrew Annual, entitled Bikure Ha-Ittim, vol. x, -Vienna, 1829, p. 118 ff. - -[86] Comp. Kritische Geschichte des Urchristenthums. 1 Theil Philo und -die jüdish-alexandrianische Theosophie, 11 Abtheilung. Stuttgart, 1835. -p. 299–356. - -[87] Diese Trennung nun aber unter ben Anhängern der -jüdisch-alexandrinischen Religionsphilosophie selbst in solche, welche -sich ausschliesslich dem beschaulichen und in Andere, welche sich -vorzugsweise dem praktischen Leben widmeten, ist es eben, welche sich -in unserem fraglichen Doppelorden auch äusserlich repräsentirte, -sodass, wenn schon beide ganz auf derselben philosophischen Unterlage -ruhten, die Therapeuten sich möglichst ausschliesslich und unmittelbar -dem höchsten von ihnen angestrebten menschlichen Lebensziele, der -Anschauung Gottes selbst, hingaben, während die Essäer gewissermassen -freiwillig in dem Vorhofe zum Allerheiligsten zögernd, sich absichtlich -und zum Besten der Brüder häufiger in Berührung setzten mit dem -Sinnlichen, als es die Naturnothwendigkeit foderte und so ihre eigene -höchste Vollkommenheit und Seligkeit zwar grossmuthig, aber gewiss auch -unphilosophisch genug augenblicklich noch verkümmerten. - -[88] Comp. Ersch und Gruber’s Allgemeine Encyklopädie, section i. vol. -xxxviii, p. 173–192. - -[89] Comp. Frankel, Zeitschrift für die religiösen Interessen des -Judenthums, vol. iii. Berlin, 1846, p. 441–461. - -[90] Comp. The Biblical Repository and Classical Review. New York, -1847, p. 162–173. - -[91] Geschichte des Volkes Israel, Vierter Band. Göttingen, 1852, p. -419–428. - -[92] Comp. Monatschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judenthums, -Zweiter Jahrgang. Leipzig, 1853, p. 30–40; 61–73. - -[93] Ich nehme diese auf kritischer Forschung, beruhenden Resultate -über diese Secte vollständig an und werde nur noch einige Pünkte -nachträglich beleuchten. - -[94] Die Eigenthümlichkeiten der Essäer lassen sich nicht genügend aus -dem Wesen der im Talmud vorkommenden חסידים oder חסידים הראשנים und -der in der Makkabäerzeit auftretenden “Assidäer” erklären; man muss -auch auf das nasiräische Wesen Rücksicht nehmen. Nasiräer gab es in der -nachexilischen Zeit eine grosse Menge (Tosifta Nasir c. iv. Babli -Berachot 48 a. 1 Makkab. ii, 49. Jos. Alterth. xviii, 6, 1). Aber sie -trugen zugleich einen andern Charakter, als die der biblischen Zeit: -sie waren Nasiräer fürs ganze Leben נזיר עולם (Nasir 4 a). Die -Mischna setzt das Vorhandensein solcher ohne Weiteres voraus, und das -Magische an dem Nasiräerthum, das sich bei den biblischen Nasiräern an -den Haarwuchs knüpfte, tritt immer mehr zurück, oder hat vielmehr gar -keine Bedeutung mehr. נזיר עולם הכביד שערו מיקל בשער (das.). Hingegen -tritt bei den lebenslänglichen Nasiräern das Levitische, die Hut vor -Verunreinigung, immer mehr in den Vordergrund (das.). Die Essäer werden -also solche Nasiräer gewesen sein, welche in ihrem Privatleben die -höchste priesterliche Weihe darstellen wollten. Den Zusammenhang -zwischen Nasiräern and Essäern deutet schon eine dunkle talmudische -Stelle an, dass Jemand sich dadurch schon dem vollständigen Nasireat -weiht, wenn er auch nur insofern Nasiräer sein will, um die Geheimnisse -entehrender Familienverhältnisse bewahren zu können: הריני נזיר אם לא -אגלה משפחות הרי זו נזיר ולא יגלה משפחות (Tosifta Nasir c. 1 b -Kiduschim 71 a). Die Erklärung dieser Stelle durch den Essenismus hat -schon Edeles (מהרש״א) in seinem Agadacommentar z. St. geahnt. Diesen -Zusammenhang zwischen Nasiräerthum und Essenismus haben Epiphanius und -die arabischen Schriftsteller Makrisi und Abulfarag’ geahnt; wenn auch -Epiphanius die Ναζαραῖοι von den Ὀσσηνοί unterscheidet, so sind die -Eigenheiten, die er von den Erstern berichtet, doch ganz essäisch. -Ebenso hat Makrisi die Essäer in drei Secten zerspalten, in die Täufer -(מנטהרון = ἡμεροβαπτισταί), die Essäer (אסאניון) und in die -Nasiräer (מתחשפון) (in de Sacy Chrestomathie Arabe Ausgabe von 1806, -arabischer Theil 172 und tome ii, 218). Das arabische Makkabäerbuch -bezeichnet die Essäer durch Chassidäer (c. xxv); in Josippon fehlen an -der Stelle, wo er von den drei Secten spricht, gerade die Essäer (iv, -6, Breithaupt) Die Identität von Nasiräern, Essäern und Assidäern wird -also von vielen Seiten bestätigt. Auch aus Josephus’ Angabe, die Essäer -hätten eigne Bücher gehabt (jüd. Kr. ii, 8, 7), lässt sich ihre -Identität mit den Assidäern erweisen. Im Talmud (Jeruschalmi Barachot, -Ende) wird aus einem Buchs der Chassidäer der Satz mitgetheilt: -“Verlässt du sie einen Tag, so verlässt sie dich zwei Tage”: כתוב בספר -חסידים אם תעובה יום יומים תעובך - -[95] Geschichte der Juden, vol. iv. Leipzig, 1856, p. 96–106; 518–528. - -[96] Geschichte des Judenthums und seiner Secten, vol. 1. Leipzig, -1857, p. 207–215. - -[97] Die Essäer waren die Baitusim, wie schon R. Asarja de’ Rossi -vermuthet hat; es muss dies nur besser begründet werden, als von ihm -geschehen ist. Ich bemerke zu dem Ende erstens, dass wie das -vorgesetzte בית auch in den Benennungen Bet-Schammaj, Bet-Hillel -Schule oder Fraction bedeutet, so Tosifta Kelim ii, 6 בית הכותים, -Chulin 6, a בי כותאי für die Sekte oder das Land der Cutim vorkommt; -sodann dass Tosifta Succa, K. iii zweimal und Tosifta Menachot K. z. -für Baitusim בית סין stehet: kann dies wohl etwas Anderes als Haus, -Sekte der Essener bedeuten? Als אסי (Arzt) Sektenname wurde, konnte -man den Essäer nicht gut mehr schlechthin אסי nennen, ohne undeutlich -zu werden, man umschrieb ihn daher wohl als Einen vom בית אסי, -bildete danach auch mit Zugrundelegung der Form Essener, das -nachgewiesene בית סין and zog dann Jenes zusammen, um den einzelnen -Essäer zu bezeichnen, gab aber dieser Form den u-Laut, entweder nachdem -man das syrische Wort אסי zuweilen nach syrischer Weise ôsseh, also -dunkel ausgesprochen hatte, woher die Aussprache Ossener bei Epiphanius -herrühren mag, oder was mir noch wahrscheinlicher ist, indem man dem -Worte Peruschim conform Zedukim und Baitusim bildete. - -[98] Nach allem diesen scheint es, dass ein Jude, welcher mit der unter -den alexandrinischen Juden aufblühenden allegorischen Exegese und mit -deren Erzeugerin, der griechischen Weisheit, bekannt geworden war, -daneben aber auch Gelegenheit gefunden hatte, von ägyptischen Priestern -Manches zu lernen, wie Pythagoras selbst, Platon und Herodot, den Plan -gefasst und ausgeführt habe, eklektisch hieraus und aus dem Judenthume -ein speculatives und asketisches System sowie nach demselben aus -judäischen Asketen eine Sekte zu bilden. Dass es an Solchen nicht -gefehlt habe, verbürgt das Vorkommen von Nasiräern, z. B. nach Tosifta -Nasir K. iv unter Schimon dem Gerechten, ferner 1 Mack. iii, 49, und -von ihrer 300 auf einmal unter Schimon ben Schatach nach Nasir jer. v, -3. Dass er aber nicht mit jüdischen Asketen in Ägypten diesen Versuch -machte, geschah vielleicht, weil es damals dort noch an solchen Asketen -fehlte, oder weil er selbst aus Judäa gebürtig sein mochte. - -[99] Geschichte des Volkes Israel von Vollendung des Zweiten Tempels -bis zur Einsetzung des Mackabäers Schimon zum hohen Priester und -Fürsten, Zweiter Band. Nordhausen, 1857, p. 368–377; 387–409. - -[100] Die jüdische Apokalyptik in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwickelung. -Jena, 1857, p. 245–278. - -[101] Geschichte der Juden, Dritter Band Zweite Auflage. Leipzig, 1863, -p. 216–252. - -[102] The History of the Jews from the earliest period down to modern -times. London, 1863, vol. ii. p. 110–115. - -[103] “Sie lieferte zwar nicht wissenschaftliche Resultate, aber ihr -Leben deutet sattsam darauf hin, dass ihre Bestrebungen darauf -gerichtet waren, wie in Alexandrien, nur von einem andern Standpunct -ans, die Religion und die Wissenschaft zu versöhnen.” Der Geist der -ersten Schriftauslegungen order: Die hagadische Exegese. Berlin, 1847, -p. 114, &c. - - - - - - - -*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE ESSENES *** - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will -be renamed. - -Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright -law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, -so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the -United States without permission and without paying copyright -royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part -of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm -concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, -and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following -the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use -of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for -copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very -easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation -of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project -Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may -do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected -by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark -license, especially commercial redistribution. - -START: FULL LICENSE - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full -Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at -www.gutenberg.org/license. - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or -destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your -possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a -Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound -by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the -person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph -1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this -agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the -Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection -of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual -works in the collection are in the public domain in the United -States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the -United States and you are located in the United States, we do not -claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, -displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as -all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope -that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting -free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm -works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the -Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily -comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the -same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when -you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are -in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, -check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this -agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, -distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any -other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no -representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any -country other than the United States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other -immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear -prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work -on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, -performed, viewed, copied or distributed: - - This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and - most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no - restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it - under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this - eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the - United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where - you are located before using this eBook. - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is -derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not -contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the -copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in -the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are -redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply -either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or -obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm -trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any -additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms -will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works -posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the -beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including -any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access -to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format -other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official -version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website -(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense -to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means -of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain -Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the -full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -provided that: - -* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed - to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has - agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid - within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are - legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty - payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in - Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg - Literary Archive Foundation." - -* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all - copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue - all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm - works. - -* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of - any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of - receipt of the work. - -* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than -are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing -from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of -the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set -forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project -Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may -contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate -or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other -intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or -other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or -cannot be read by your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium -with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you -with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in -lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person -or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second -opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If -the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing -without further opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO -OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT -LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of -damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement -violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the -agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or -limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or -unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the -remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in -accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the -production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, -including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of -the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this -or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or -additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any -Defect you cause. - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of -computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It -exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations -from people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future -generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see -Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at -www.gutenberg.org - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by -U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, -Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up -to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website -and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without -widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND -DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular -state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To -donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project -Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be -freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and -distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of -volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in -the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not -necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper -edition. - -Most people start at our website which has the main PG search -facility: www.gutenberg.org - -This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. |
