summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/68493-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/68493-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/68493-0.txt1763
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1763 deletions
diff --git a/old/68493-0.txt b/old/68493-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index a9f10bb..0000000
--- a/old/68493-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,1763 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg eBook of Promoting good citizenship, by James
-Bryce
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
-will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before
-using this eBook.
-
-Title: Promoting good citizenship
-
-Author: James Bryce
-
-Release Date: July 10, 2022 [eBook #68493]
-
-Language: English
-
-Produced by: Charlie Howard and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team
- at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
- generously made available by The Internet Archive)
-
-*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PROMOTING GOOD
-CITIZENSHIP ***
-
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber’s Note: Italic text is enclosed in _underscores_;
-boldface text is enclosed in =equals signs=.
-
-
-
-
- RIVERSIDE ESSAYS
-
- EDITED BY
- ADA L. F. SNELL
-
- ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH
- MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE
-
-
-
-
-Riverside Essays
-
-Edited by Ada L. F. Snell
-
-
- =THE AMERICAN MIND AND AMERICAN IDEALISM.= By Bliss Perry. 35
- cents.
-
- =UNIVERSITY SUBJECTS.= By John Henry Newman. 35 cents.
-
- =STUDIES IN NATURE AND LITERATURE.= By John Burroughs. 35 cents.
-
- =PROMOTING GOOD CITIZENSHIP.= By James Bryce. 35 cents.
-
- _Prices are net, postpaid_
- _Other titles in preparation_
-
- HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
- BOSTON NEW YORK CHICAGO
-
-
-
-
- The Riverside Literature Series
-
- PROMOTING
- GOOD CITIZENSHIP
-
- BY
- JAMES BRYCE
-
- [Illustration]
-
-
- BOSTON NEW YORK CHICAGO
- HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
- The Riverside Press Cambridge
-
-
-
-
- COPYRIGHT, 1909, BY YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS
- COPYRIGHT, 1913, BY ADA L. F. SNELL
-
- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
-
- R. L. S. 227
-
-
- The Riverside Press
- CAMBRIDGE . MASSACHUSETTS
- U . S . A
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS
-
-
- INTRODUCTION vii
-
- INDOLENCE 1
-
- HOW TO OVERCOME THE OBSTACLES TO GOOD
- CITIZENSHIP 26
-
- The two essays by Mr. James Bryce included in this volume are
- reprinted by permission of Yale University from Mr. Bryce’s
- lectures on the Dodge Foundation, published in book form by the
- Yale University Press under the title of _The Hindrances to Good
- Citizenship_.
-
-
-
-
-INTRODUCTION
-
-
-Mr. Bryce has for a long time been a man of international prominence.
-His wide influence is undoubtedly due to many causes, but it may, in
-general, be traced to two characteristics: Mr. Bryce is a humanist
-who sympathetically watches the progress of nations and the guiding
-of governments; he is also a historian. In his biographical study of
-John Richard Green he has skillfully analyzed the aptitudes of the
-historian, and in so doing has pointedly, if unwittingly, described
-himself. Accuracy, he says,--a desire for the exact truth,--keen
-observation, sound judgment, imagination, and, following inevitably
-from these, command of literary exposition, are the powers which a
-historian needs. Each of these qualities Mr. Bryce himself possesses
-in large measure. It is his historical power, enabling him to observe
-and record the significant phases and events of human life, plus his
-sympathetic interest in its present-day manifestations which explain,
-in some degree, his singularly eminent position as an authority on
-matters pertaining to human institutions in various countries.
-
-Mr. Bryce was born in northern Ireland in 1838, of Scotch-Irish
-parents; and he combines in his nature the stalwart intellectual
-propensities of the Scot and the artistic attributes of the Celt. He
-was educated at the University of Glasgow, and later went to Oxford
-where he won many honors. After finishing his collegiate work he was
-admitted to the bar and practiced law in London until 1882. At the
-age of thirty-two he was appointed Regius Professor of Civil Law at
-Oxford. Up to this point his life had been almost exclusively that of
-a student and a scholar; and already at this time he was recognized as
-a man of remarkable historical ability. The year 1880 marked a change
-in his life. He presented himself to the workingmen of Tower Hamlets,
-London, as a candidate for a seat in the House of Commons. Mr. Stead
-tells us that Mr. Bryce, in this first campaign, addressed his open-air
-audiences somewhat after the manner of a professor lecturing in a
-classroom; he succeeded, nevertheless, in getting himself elected,
-and for over twenty-five years thereafter was a member of Parliament.
-During these years he held various responsible offices having to do
-with home and foreign administrative work. The practical results of his
-political influence were advancement in public education, the securing
-of more extensive parks and open country spaces for the pleasure of the
-poorer classes, and the furtherance of international peace. In 1907,
-Mr. Bryce was appointed ambassador to the United States, which office
-he resigned in 1913 to carry on literary work.
-
-Mr. Bryce’s knowledge is the result not only of university training and
-experience in public life, but also of varied reading. He has read art,
-science, history, and has always been an interested student of poetry.
-In speaking once to Americans of Swinburne, he suddenly paused and
-asked, “Who are writing your songs and stirring your heart,--or isn’t
-your heart being stirred? Nothing is more important than that each
-generation and each land should have its poets. Each oncoming tide of
-life, each age, requires and needs men of lofty thought who shall dream
-and sing for it, who shall gather up its tendencies and formulate its
-ideals and voice its spirit, proclaiming its duties and awakening its
-enthusiasm, through the high authority of the poet and the art of his
-verse.” How extensively Mr. Bryce has read the poets, both ancient and
-modern, one perceives from the references and allusions in his _Studies
-in Contemporary Biography_.
-
-The most important source of Mr. Bryce’s knowledge, the one which
-has furnished the material for nearly all his books, has been his
-first-hand observation and study of many countries. When still a
-young man he wandered alone over Mount Ararat, since the native
-guides refused to follow him to the unknown wilds of that lonely
-peak. He visited the Ottoman Empire in 1876, and, as a result of his
-investigations there, became an advocate of the Bulgarian cause; in
-fact it was his speeches on the Eastern Question which first made him
-prominent politically. Mr. Bryce has traveled also in Iceland; he was
-in Africa just previous to the Boer War; he has been all over South
-America; and he knows the United States as few Americans know it. He
-has studied these countries with great faithfulness, observing keenly
-every phase of the political and social life. An interesting sample of
-his method of gathering information is found in the chapter on “The
-Position of Women” in _The American Commonwealth_. When traveling in
-the West he noticed that all of the women seemed so very well dressed
-that apparently none could be the wife or daughter of a workingman;
-but close observation dispelled this illusion. Idling in a bookstore
-one day in Oregon, he noticed a woman who was asking for a certain
-magazine. After her departure he asked the salesman who she was, and
-found that she was the wife of a workman, and the magazine a Paris
-fashion journal. “This,” says Mr. Bryce, “set me to observing female
-dress more closely, and it turned out to be perfectly true that the
-women in these little towns were following the Parisian fashions very
-closely, and were, in fact, ahead of the majority of English ladies
-belonging to the professional and mercantile classes.” Thus no detail,
-however trivial, escapes him; the pleasant and unpleasant phases of
-our American life, our manners, clothes, scenery have all been noted
-and reckoned with in the statement of tendencies and conclusions.
-
-As a parliamentarian Mr. Bryce is said to have been direct, honest,
-and always illuminating. His ability to command attention was due not
-to any great oratorical gift, but rather to his scholarly view of any
-matter under debate. Mr. Justin McCarthy reports that the members
-of the House who might be dining, smoking, or reading in the rooms
-assigned for these purposes, would, when the news was passed around
-that Mr. Bryce was speaking, leave these pleasant diversions, and
-betake themselves with great speed to the debating chamber. “I have
-many a time,” he says, “heard Conservative members murmur, in tones
-not altogether expressing absolute satisfaction at the disturbing
-information, ‘Bryce is up--I must go in and hear what he has to say.’
-... Everybody knows that when he speaks it is because he has something
-to say which ought to be spoken and therefore ought to be heard.” Mr.
-Bryce was able to command attention also because of his reputation as
-a courageous nonpartisan. He never advocated a measure or policy for
-mere party reasons or for personal aggrandizement. Not infrequently
-he has fought bravely with the minority of his own party, and has at
-times suffered bitter attacks, as when he remained resolutely pro-Boer
-during the rampant jingoism of the South African War. But however
-widely political enemies might differ from him, they respected his
-sincerity and his luminous view of governmental problems. It is further
-characteristic of Mr. Bryce’s public life that he never, in his desire
-for the welfare of his own country, lost sight of what is due other
-nations. In practice as well as in precept he upheld the doctrine that
-“patriotism consists not in waving a flag, but in striving that our
-country shall be righteous as well as strong.”
-
-Mr. Bryce’s books deal, for the most part, with historical subjects and
-present-day governments. _The Holy Roman Empire_, written when he was
-only twenty-four years old, is still regarded by able historians as
-an accurate and authoritative work; and, in the judgment of literary
-critics, it is written with so much charm of style that it is destined
-to become an English classic. All of the books which have to do with
-foreign nations are characterized by a tactful, faithful, and above all
-a truthful, handling. It was _The American Commonwealth_ which made
-the citizens of the United States regard Mr. Bryce as a friend of the
-Republic; but he is not so regarded because he has always stroked the
-gleaming pinions of the American eagle. Although he does seem to share
-the hope universally cherished by Americans that we shall, in spite
-of grave national defects, “win out” in the end, he has nevertheless,
-in direct and unadorned statements, pointed out our faults. As an
-example of his characteristic straightforwardness of speech, take the
-following sentence: “America has little occasion to think of foreign
-affairs, but some of her domestic difficulties are such as to demand
-that careful observation and unbroken reflection which neither her
-executive magistrates, nor her legislatures, nor any leading class
-among her people now give.” Mr. Bryce has never ceased to insist that
-America suffers from lack of honest, courageous leadership in dealing
-with such problems as municipal evils and the insidious influence of
-“vested interests.” Our heedlessness and indifference to public matters
-is our national sin, but Mr. Bryce foresees a cure for our defects
-in the increasing zeal with which the younger generation is assuming
-the public burden; but how great must be its zeal and how steady its
-purpose if anything is to be accomplished, one is made poignantly
-aware by reading the account of the Tammany Ring in _The American
-Commonwealth_.
-
-When a man of Mr. Bryce’s ability and experience points out definitely
-the chief obstacles to good citizenship and furthermore indicates
-the means by which these may be overcome, one may be as sure that he
-will say something which should be heeded as were the members of the
-House when he was a parliamentarian. In 1909, Mr. Bryce gave at Yale
-University a series of lectures which were later published by the Yale
-University Press under the title _Hindrances to Good Citizenship_. The
-main obstacles to good citizenship are defined as indolence, private
-self-interest, and party spirit.
-
-The first lecture, “Indolence,” brings to mind the chapter in _The
-American Commonwealth_ on “The War Against Bossdom,” with its vigorous
-concluding words, “In America, as everywhere else in the world, the
-commonwealth suffers more often from apathy or shortsightedness in the
-upper classes, who ought to lead, than from ignorance or recklessness
-in the humbler classes, who generally are ready to follow when wisely
-led.”
-
-In the second lecture, “Private Self-Interest,” Mr. Bryce states the
-causes which produce a body of citizens who care more about their own
-advancement than about the welfare of the country. The most important
-of these causes are tariff issues, appropriations of public money for
-local interests, governmental contracts, public officeholding,--all
-representing “the insidious power of money which knows how to play upon
-the self-interest of voters and legislators, polluting at its source
-the spring of Civic Duty.”
-
-The third lecture considers party spirit as a hindrance to
-citizenship. Mr. Bryce acknowledges the practical necessity for parties
-in the management of popular governments, and also the perplexing
-difficulties of a party leader who must decide between conscience and
-party. There is nevertheless but one course open to him: he must follow
-his conscience; only he must carefully distinguish between conscience
-and angular independence which is lacking in common sense and in
-willingness to defer to others in unimportant matters. For the average
-man the question is a simple one; relieved of the burdens of party
-leadership, he should follow his intelligence rather than his party. A
-large number of independent voters secures most effectively the right
-administration of public business.
-
-The last lecture in the series, “How to Overcome the Obstacles to Good
-Citizenship,” suggests various means by which a more satisfactory
-body of citizens may be secured. In method and style this lecture is
-illustrative of the author’s peculiar strength in exposition.
-
-Mr. Bryce’s writings are remarkable for the lucid organization of a
-wealth of detail into significant principles and sound conclusions; for
-vividness in the presentation of whatever pertains to humanity, and
-for gracious, winning English. One finds always in his work simplicity
-in the unfolding of material which has been carefully gathered and
-calmly judged. There is perfect clarity in the handling of a mass of
-detail, and such skillful subordination of it and masterly emphasis of
-important principles that the reader easily catches the bearing on the
-central thought of every illustration or description. There is also in
-the writing a solidity and firmness, a bracing stalwartness--qualities
-which are the result of the writer’s own sturdy nature. But this is
-not all. The author’s almost novelistic power of seeing persons and
-things makes his writing as vivid as a story; even his most abstract
-propositions are tangible and real. And the material is, moreover, so
-sympathetically and earnestly treated that it is at times lifted above
-mere pedestrian exposition and becomes warm with the feeling of the
-writer. The everyday words and unadorned sentences, infused with the
-spirit of the one who writes, become potent to stir slumbering ideals.
-Suddenly over the level way of mere intellectual matters falls a dreamy
-light, a Celtic graciousness of manner; and the reader no longer
-journeys along a mere brown path, but sees the familiar scenes of the
-way idealized by the touch of poetry. The value of skillful exposition
-as an asset for leadership, or for the accomplishment of any other
-purpose, Mr. Bryce fully appreciates. A command of language is a power
-possessed by nearly every one of the men, eminent in the nineteenth
-century, whom Mr. Bryce describes in his _Studies in Contemporary
-Biography_. By means of it Mr. John Richard Green wrote the most
-brilliant history of modern times; through the stirring editorials of
-the _Nation_, Mr. Godkin was able to arouse an indifferent American
-public to a more earnest consideration of the national welfare; and
-it was Mr. Gladstone’s gift of “noble utterance” which more than any
-other talent enabled him for many years to hold an authoritative
-political position. Mr. Bryce’s own rare power as a writer of vigorous,
-persuasive English is one of the qualities which has made him in
-a certain sense a citizen of the world with an almost world-wide
-influence.
-
-However helpful Mr. Bryce’s method may be for the student who is
-attempting to understand and master the technique of successful
-English, it is the subject-matter which is primarily of importance.
-It is valuable for the student since it may serve to stimulate the
-investigation and expression of certain questions connected with the
-administration of public matters in his own town or city; and it may
-also suggest the explanation and judgment of measures proposed to
-secure better government, such as the Referendum. But the essential
-worth of the material lies in the fact that it is a tonic for relaxed
-vigilance in public affairs. It would be well to require every
-citizen of the United States to read in school days _The American
-Commonwealth_; one ventures to say that there would be, as a result,
-a steady advancement in the right understanding and fulfillment of
-civic duties; but even a limited acquaintance with Mr. Bryce should
-serve to define in clearer terms the elements of a sane and effective
-patriotism. And Mr. Bryce’s own life, unfalteringly and resolutely
-devoted to a just administration of governments, together with its
-unfailing graciousness in the most trying situations, furnishes an
-invigorating example of the truly successful statesman.
-
- ADA L. F. SNELL.
-
-
-
-
-Promoting Good Citizenship
-
-
-
-
-INDOLENCE
-
-
-Dr. Samuel Johnson, being once asked how he came to have made a blunder
-in his famous English Dictionary, is reported to have answered,
-“Ignorance, Sir, sheer ignorance.” Whoever has grown old enough to look
-back over the wasted opportunities of life--and we all of us waste
-more opportunities than we use--will be apt to ascribe most of his
-blunders to sheer indolence. Sometimes one has omitted to learn what
-it was needful to learn in order to proceed to action; sometimes one
-has shrunk from the painful effort required to reflect and decide on
-one’s course, leaving it to Fortune to settle what Will ought to have
-settled; sometimes one has, from mere self-indulgent sluggishness, let
-the happy moment slip.
-
-The difference between men who succeed and men who fail is not so much
-as we commonly suppose due to differences in intellectual capacity.
-The difference which counts for most is that between activity and
-slackness; between the man who, observing alertly and reflecting
-incessantly, anticipates contingencies before they occur, and the
-lazy, easy-going, slowly-moving man who is roused with difficulty,
-will not trouble himself to look ahead, and so being taken unprepared
-loses or misuses the opportunities that lead to fortune. If it be true
-that everywhere, though perhaps less here than in European countries,
-energy is the exception rather than the rule, we need not wonder that
-men show in the discharge of civic duty the defects which they show in
-their own affairs. No doubt public affairs demand only a small part
-of their time. But the spring of self-interest is not strong where
-public affairs are concerned. The need for activity is not continuously
-present. A duty shared with many others seems less of a personal duty.
-If a hundred, a thousand, ten thousand other citizens are as much bound
-to speak, vote, or act as each one of us is, the sense of obligation
-becomes to each of us weak. Still weaker does it become when one
-perceives the neglect of others to do their duty. The need for the
-good citizen’s action, no doubt, becomes then all the greater. But
-it is only the best sort of citizen that feels it to be greater. The
-Average Man judges himself by the average standard and does not see why
-he should take more trouble than his neighbours. Thus we arrive at a
-result summed up in the terrible dictum, which reveals the basic fault
-of democracy, “What is Everybody’s business is Nobody’s business.”
-
-Of indolence, indifference, apathy, in general, no more need be said.
-It is a sin that easily besets us all. We might suppose that where
-public affairs are concerned it would decrease under the influence of
-education and the press. But several general causes have tended to
-increase it in our own generation, despite the increasing strength of
-the appeal which civic duty makes to men who are, or if they cared
-might be, better informed about public affairs than were their fathers.
-
-The first of these causes is that manners have grown gentler and
-passions less angry. A chief duty of the good citizen is to be angry
-when anger is called for, and to express his anger by deeds, to
-attack the bad citizen in office, or otherwise in power, to expose his
-dishonesty, to eject him from office, to brand him with an ignominy
-which will prevent his returning to any post of trust. In former
-days indignation flamed higher, and there was little tenderness for
-offenders. Jehu smote the prophets of Baal. Bad ministers--and no
-doubt sometimes good ministers also--were in England beheaded on Tower
-Hill. Everywhere punishment came quicker and was more severe, though
-to be sure it was often too harsh. Nowadays the arm of justice is
-often arrested by an indulgence which forgets that the true aim of
-punishment is the protection of the community. The very safeguards
-with which our slower and more careful procedure has surrounded trials
-and investigations, proper as such safeguards are for the security of
-the innocent, have often so delayed the march of justice that when
-a conviction has at last been obtained, the offence has begun to be
-forgotten and the offender escapes with a trifling penalty, or with
-none. This is an illustration of the principle that as righteous
-indignation is a valuable motive power in politics, the decline in it
-means a decline either in the standard of virtue or in the standard of
-zeal, possibly in both.
-
-Another cause may be found in the fact that the enormous growth of
-modern states has made the share in government of the individual
-citizen seem infinitesimally small. In an average Greek republic,
-he was one of from two to ten thousand voters. In England or France
-to-day he is one of many millions. The chance that his vote will make
-any difference to the result is so slender that it appears to him
-negligible. We are proud, and justly proud, of having adapted free
-government to areas far vaster than were formerly thought capable of
-receiving free institutions. It was hoped that the patriotism of the
-citizen would expand with the magnitude of the State. But this did not
-happen in Rome, the greatest of ancient republics. Can we say that it
-has happened in the modern world? Few of us realize that though our own
-share may be smaller our responsibility increases with the power our
-State exerts. The late Professor Henry Sidgwick once travelled from
-Davos in the easternmost corner of Switzerland to the town of Cambridge
-in England and back again to deliver his vote against Home Rule at the
-general election of 1886, though he knew that his own side would have a
-majority in the constituency. Those who knew applauded, his opponents
-included, but I fear that few of us followed this shining example of
-civic virtue.
-
-Thirdly, the highest, because the most difficult, duty of a citizen
-is to fight valiantly for his convictions when he is in a minority.
-The smaller the minority, and the more unpopular it is, and the more
-violent are the attacks upon it, so much the louder is the call of
-duty to defend one’s opinions. To withstand the “ardor civium prava
-iubentium”--to face “the multitude hasting to do evil”--this is the
-note and the test of genuine virtue and courage. Now this is, or seems
-to be, a more formidable task the vaster the community becomes. It is
-harder to make your voice heard against the roar of ocean than against
-the whistling squall that sweeps down over a mountain lake.
-
-Lastly, there has been within the last century a great accession to our
-knowledge of nature, a more widely diffused and developed interest in
-literature and art as well as in science. This development, in itself
-fraught with laudable means of enjoyment, has had the unforeseen yet
-natural result of reducing the interest in public affairs among the
-educated classes, while the ardour with which competitions in physical
-strength and skill are followed has in like manner diverted the
-thoughts and attention of the less educated--and indeed, not of them
-alone but of many also in a class from whom better things might have
-been expected. Politics, in fact, have nowadays to strive against more
-rival subjects attracting men’s eyes and minds than they had before
-scientific discovery and art, and above all, athletic sports, came to
-fill newspapers and magazines.
-
-But so far from being less important than they were, politics are
-growing in every country more important the wider the sphere of
-governmental action becomes. Nevertheless, even in England, which is
-perhaps slightly less addicted to this new passion for looking on at
-and reading about athletic competitions than are North America and
-Australia, a cricket or football match or a horse-race seems, if one
-may judge by the eager throngs that snatch the evening newspapers, to
-excite more interest in the middle as well as in the richer and in the
-upper section of the poorer classes than does any political event.
-
-How to overcome these adverse tendencies is a question which I reserve
-till the last of these lectures. Meantime, let us look at some of the
-forms in which indifference to the obligations of citizenship reveals
-itself.
-
-The first duty of the citizen used to be to fight, and to fight
-not merely against foes from another State, but against those also
-who, within his own State, were trying to overturn the Constitution
-or resist the laws. It is a duty still incumbent on us all, though
-the existence of soldiers and a police force calls us to it less
-frequently. The omission to take up arms in a civil strife was a grave
-offence in the republics of antiquity, where revolutions were frequent,
-as they are to-day in some of the states of Latin America. When
-respectable people stayed at home instead of taking sword and spear to
-drive out the adherents of an adventurer trying to make himself Tyrant,
-they gave the adventurer his chance: and in any case their abstention
-tended to prolong a civil war which would end sooner when it was seen
-which way the bulk of the people inclined. There was accordingly a
-law in some of the Greek republics that every citizen must take one
-side or the other in an insurrection. If he did not, he was liable
-to punishment. I have not heard of any one being indicted in England
-or the United States for failing to discharge his legal duty to join
-in the hue and cry after a thief, or to rally to the sheriff when he
-calls upon the _posse comitatus_ to support him in maintaining law and
-order. But possibly an indictment would still lie; and in England we
-have within recent times enrolled bodies of special constables from the
-civil population to aid in maintaining public tranquillity.
-
-More peaceful times have substituted for the duty of fighting the
-duty of voting. But even in small communities the latter duty has
-been often neglected. In Athens the magistrates used to send round
-the Scythian bowmen, who acted as their police, to scour the streets
-with a rope coloured with vermilion, and drag towards the Pnyx (the
-place of assembly), citizens who preferred to lounge or to mind what
-they called their own business, as if ruling the State was not their
-business. So in modern Switzerland some cantons have enacted laws
-fining those who, without reasonable excuse, neglect to vote.[1] This
-is the more remarkable because the Swiss have a good record in the
-matter of voting, better, I think, than any other European people. Such
-a law witnesses not to exceptional negligence but to an exceptionally
-high standard of duty. In Britain we sometimes bring to the polls at a
-parliamentary election eighty, or even more than eighty, per cent of
-our registered electors, which is pretty good when it is remembered
-that the register may have been made up eleven months earlier, so
-that many electors are sure to have moved elsewhere. At elections for
-local authorities a much smaller proportion vote; and I fancy, though
-I have no figures at hand, that in France, Belgium, and still more
-in Italy the percentage voting at all sorts of elections is less than
-in Switzerland or in Britain. The number who vote does not perfectly
-measure the personal sense of duty among electors, because an efficient
-party organization may, like the Scythian bowmen, sweep voters who
-do not care but who can be either driven to the polls or paid to go.
-Unless it is money that takes the voters there, it is well that they
-should go; for it helps to form the habit.
-
- [1] This example has, I believe, been followed in Belgium.
-
-Another form of civic apathy is the reluctance to undertake civic
-functions. In England this is not discoverable in any want of
-candidates for Parliament. They abound, though sometimes the fittest
-men prefer ease or business success to public life. But seats upon
-local authorities and especially upon municipal councils and district
-councils, seldom attract the best ability of the local community. In
-English and Scottish cities the leading commercial, financial, and
-professional men do not often appear as candidates, leaving the work
-to persons who are not indeed incompetent, being usually intelligent
-business men, but whose education and talents are sometimes below the
-level of the functions which these bodies discharge. No great harm
-has followed, because our city councillors are almost always honest.
-Local public opinion is vigilant and exacting, so a high standard of
-probity is maintained. But municipalities have latterly embarked on so
-many kinds of new work, and the revenues of the greater cities have so
-grown, that not merely business capacity and experience, but a large
-grasp of economic principles is required. This is no less true here in
-America, yet I gather that here it is found even more difficult than in
-Europe to secure the presence of able administrators in city councils.
-
-A man engaged in a large business who takes up municipal work may
-doubtless find that he is making a pecuniary sacrifice. But if he has
-already an income sufficient for his comfort, may it not be his best
-way of serving his fellow-men?
-
-Many such men do serve as governors or trustees of educational or other
-public institutions which make nearly as great a demand on their time
-as the membership of a public body would. Others, in Europe, if less
-frequently here, give to amusement much more of their leisure than the
-needs of recreation and health require. This is often due rather to
-thoughtlessness than to a conscious indifference to the call of duty.
-
-Some of your political reformers have dwelt on the difficulties which
-party organizations, specially powerful in the United States, place in
-the way of educated and public-spirited men seeking to enter politics.
-There may be truth in this as regards the lower districts of the larger
-cities, but one can scarcely think it generally true even of the
-cities. More frequently it is alleged that the work of local politics
-is disagreeable, bringing a man into contact with vulgar people and
-exposing him to misrepresentation and abuse.
-
-This is an excuse for abstention which ought never to be heard in a
-democratic country. If politics are anywhere vulgar, they ought not
-to be suffered to remain vulgar, as they will remain if the better
-educated citizens keep aloof. They involve the highest interests
-of the nation or the city. The way in which they are handled is a
-lesson to the people either in honesty or in knavery. The best element
-in a community cannot afford to let its interests be the sport of
-self-seekers or rogues. Moreover, the loss by maladministration or
-robbery, large as it may sometimes be, is a less serious evil than is
-the damage to public morals. If those who have the manners and speak
-the language of educated men refuse to enter practical politics, they
-must cease to complain of a want of refinement in politics. In reality,
-good manners are the best way in which to meet rudeness; and he who
-is too thin-skinned to disregard abuse confesses his own want of
-manliness. The mass of the people, even those who are neither educated
-nor fastidious, know honesty when they see it, and discount such abuse.
-When a man is firm and upright, nothing better braces him up and fits
-him to serve his country than to be attacked on the platform or in the
-press for faults he has not committed. It puts him on his mettle. It
-toughens his fibre. It gives him self-control and teaches him how to
-do right in the way which is least exposed to misrepresentation. It
-nerves his courage for the far more difficult trials which come when
-friends as well as opponents censure him because honour and obedience
-to his conscience have required him to take an unpopular line and speak
-unwelcome truths. A little persecution for righteousness’ sake is a
-wholesome thing.
-
-The deficient sense of civic duty, though most frequently noted in the
-form of a neglect to vote, is really more general and serious in the
-neglect to think. Were it possible to have statistics to show what
-percentage of those who vote reflect upon the vote they have to give,
-there would in no country be found a large percentage. Yet what is the
-worth of a vote except as the expression of a considered opinion? The
-act of marking a ballot is nothing unless the mark carries with it a
-judgment, the preference of a good candidate to a bad one, the approval
-of one policy offered the people, the rejection of another. The
-citizen owes it to the community to inform himself about the questions
-submitted for his decision, and weigh the arguments on each side; or if
-the issue be one rather of persons than of policies, to learn all he
-can regarding the merits of the candidates offered to his choice.
-
-How many voters really trouble themselves to do this? One in five? One
-in ten? One in twenty?
-
-It may be asked, How can they do it? What means have they of studying
-public questions and reaching just conclusions? If the means are
-wanting, can we blame them if they do not think? If they feel they
-do not understand, can we blame them if they do not vote? In every
-free country the suffrage is now so wide that the great majority of
-the voters have to labour for their daily bread. In most European
-countries many are imperfectly educated. In the rural districts they
-read with difficulty, see either no newspaper or one which helps them
-but little, lead isolated lives in which there are scanty opportunities
-for learning what passes, so that the best they can do seems to be to
-ask advice from the priest, or the village schoolmaster, or take advice
-from their landlord or their employer. In the northern parts of the
-United States and also in Canada, the native population has indeed
-received a fair instruction, and reads newspapers; but the mass of
-voters is swelled by a crowd of recent immigrants, most of whom cannot
-read English and know nothing of your institutions.
-
-Broadly speaking, in modern countries ruled by universal suffrage
-the Average Citizen has not the means of adequately discharging
-the function which the constitution throws upon him of following,
-examining, and judging those problems of statesmanship which the
-ever-growing range of government administration and the ever-increasing
-complexity of our civilization set before him as a voter to whom issues
-of policy are submitted.
-
-As things stand, he votes, when he votes, not from knowledge, but as
-his party or his favourite newspaper bids him, or according to his
-predilection for some particular leader. Unless it be held that every
-man has a natural and indefeasible right to a share in the government
-of the country in which he resides, the ground for giving that share
-would seem to be the competence of the recipient and the belief that
-his sharing will promote the general welfare. So one may almost say
-that the theory of universal suffrage assumes that the Average Citizen
-is an active, instructed, intelligent ruler of his country.[2] The
-facts contradict this assumption.
-
- [2] It may no doubt be argued that even if he is not competent,
- it is better he should be within than without the voting
- class. But this was not the ground generally taken by those
- who brought in universal suffrage.
-
-Does this mean that widely extended suffrage is a failure, and that the
-Average Man is not a competent citizen in a democracy?
-
-This question brings us to reflect on another branch of civic duty not
-yet mentioned. Besides the civic duties already described of Fighting,
-Voting, and Thinking, there is another duty. It is the duty of Mutual
-Help, the duty incumbent on those who possess, through their knowledge
-and intelligence, the capacity of Instruction and Persuasion to advise
-and to guide their less competent fellow-citizens. No sensible man
-ought ever to have supposed that under such conditions as large modern
-communities present, the bulk of the citizens could vote wisely from
-their own private knowledge and intelligence. Even in small cities,
-such as was Sicyon in the days of Aratus, or Boston in the days of
-James Otis, the Average Man needed the help of his more educated and
-wiser neighbours. While communities remained small, it was easy to
-get this help. But now the swift and vast growth of states and cities
-has changed everything. Private talk counts for less when the richer
-citizens dwell apart from the poorer; their opportunities of meeting
-are fewer, and there is less friendliness, if also less dependence, in
-the relation of the employed to the employer. Public meetings do not
-give nearly all that the Average Man needs, not to add that being got
-together to present one set of facts and arguments and deliberately
-to ignore the other, they do not put him in a fair position to judge.
-Besides, the men who most need instruction are usually those who least
-come to meetings to receive it.
-
-To fill this void the newspapers have arisen,--organs purporting to
-supply the materials required for the formation of political opinion.
-Whatever the services of the newspaper in other respects, it has the
-inevitable defect of superseding, with most of those who read it, the
-exercise of independent thought. The newspaper--I speak generally, for
-there are some brilliant exceptions--is, in Europe even more than here,
-almost always partisan in its views, often partisan in its selection
-of facts or at least in its way of stating them. Presenting one side
-of a case, addressing chiefly those who are already adherents of that
-side, putting a colour on the events it reports,--it serves up to the
-reader ideas, perhaps only mere phrases or catchwords, which confirm
-him in his prepossessions, and by its daily iteration makes him take
-them for truths. Seldom has he the leisure, still more seldom the
-impulse or the patience, to scrutinize these ideas for himself and
-form his own judgment. He is glad to be relieved of the necessity for
-thinking, because thinking is hard work. Indolence again! The habit of
-mind that is formed by hasty reading, and especially by the reading of
-newspapers and magazines in which the matter, excellent as parts of it
-often are, is so multifarious that one topic diverts attention from the
-others, tends to a general dissipation and distraction of thought. It
-is a habit which tells upon us all and makes continuous reflection and
-a critical or logical treatment of the subjects deserving reflection
-more irksome to us in the full sunlight of to-day than it was to those
-whom we call our benighted ancestors.
-
-This is only one form of that supersession of the practice of thinking
-by the vice commonly called “the reading habit” which is profoundly
-affecting the intellectual life of our time. Yet as steady thinking
-was never really common even among the educated, the difference from
-earlier days is not so correctly described by saying that people think
-less than formerly, as by noting that while people read more, and
-while far more people read, the ratio of thinking to reading does not
-increase either in the individual or in the mass, and may possibly be
-decreasing. Intelligence and independence of thought have not grown in
-proportion to the diffusion of knowledge. The number of persons who
-both read and vote is in England and France more than twenty times as
-great as it was seventy years ago. The percentage of those who reflect
-before they vote has not kept pace either with popular education or
-with the extension of the suffrage.
-
-The persons who constitute that percentage are, and must for the
-reasons already given continue for some time to be, only a fraction,
-in some countries a small fraction, of the voting population. But the
-fraction might be made much larger than it is. The citizens who stand
-above their fellows in knowledge and mental power ought to set an
-example, not only by themselves thinking more and thinking harder about
-public affairs than most of them do, but also by exerting themselves to
-stimulate and aid their less instructed or more listless neighbours.
-The voter, it is said, should be independent. Yes. But independence
-does not mean isolation. He must not commit his personal responsibility
-to the keeping of another. Yes. But personal responsibility does not
-mean the vain conceit of knowledge and judgment where knowledge is
-wanting and judgment is untrained.
-
-Just as his religion throws upon every Christian the duty of loving
-his neighbour and giving practical expression to his love by helping
-his neighbour, succouring him in the hour of need, trying to rescue
-him from sin, seeking to guide his steps into the way of peace, so
-civic duty requires each of us to raise the level of citizenship not
-merely by ourselves voting and bearing a share in political agitation,
-but by trying to diffuse among our fellow-citizens whose opportunities
-have been less favourable, the knowledge and the fairness of mind and
-the habit of grappling with political questions which a democratic
-government must demand even from the Average Man. Democracy, they say,
-is based on Equality. But in no form of government is leadership so
-essential. A multitude without intelligent, responsible leaders whom
-it respects and follows is a crowd ready to become the prey of any
-self-seeking knave. Nor is it true that because men value equality they
-reject eminence. They are always glad to be led if some one, eschewing
-pretension and condescension, speaking to them with respect, but also
-with that authority which knowledge and capacity imply, will point
-out the path and give them the lead for which they are looking. To do
-this has now, in our great cities, become more difficult than it used
-to be, because men of different classes and different occupations do
-not know one another as well as they once did, and economic conflicts
-have made workingmen suspicious. But there are those in our English and
-Scottish cities who do it successfully, and I have never heard that
-it is resented. It is largely a matter of tact, and of knowing how to
-express that genuine sense of human fellowship which is commoner in the
-richer class than the constraint and shyness that are supposed to beset
-Englishmen sometimes allow to appear.
-
-If you and we, both here and in Britain, are less active than we should
-be in this and other forms of civic work, the fault lies in our not
-caring enough for our country. It is easy to wave a flag, to cheer
-an eminent statesman, to exult in some achievement by land or sea.
-But our imaginations are too dull to realize either the grandeur of
-the State in its splendid opportunities for promoting the welfare of
-the masses, or the fact that the nobility of the State lies in its
-being the true child, the true exponent, of the enlightened will of a
-right-minded and law-abiding people. Absorbed in business or pleasure,
-we think too little of what our membership in a free nation means for
-the happiness of our poorer fellow-citizens. The eloquent voice of a
-patriotic reformer sometimes breaks our slumber. But the daily round
-of business and pleasure soon again fills the mind, and public duty
-fades into the background of life. This dulness of imagination and the
-mere indolence which makes us neglect to stop and think, are a chief
-cause of that indifference which chokes the growth of civic duty. It is
-because a great University like this is the place where the imagination
-of young men may best be quickened by the divine fire, because the
-sons of a great University are those who may best carry with them into
-after life the inspiration which history and philosophy and poetry have
-kindled within its venerable walls, that I have ventured to dwell here
-on the special duty which those who enjoy these privileges owe to their
-brethren, partners in the citizenship of a great republic.
-
-
-
-
-HOW TO OVERCOME THE OBSTACLES TO GOOD CITIZENSHIP
-
-
-In the preceding three lectures[3] the chief hindrances to the
-discharge of civic duty have been considered. Let us now go on to
-inquire what can be done to remove these hindrances by grappling with
-those faults or weaknesses in the citizen to which they are due. When
-symptoms have been examined, one looks about for remedies.
-
- [3] The two lectures reprinted in this volume are the first
- and last of a series of four given by Mr. Bryce at Yale
- University.
-
-We have seen that of the three causes assigned, Indolence, Selfish
-Personal Interest, and Party Spirit, the first is the most common, the
-second the most noxious, the third the most excusable, yet also the
-most subtle, and perhaps the most likely to affect the class which
-takes the lead in politics and is incessantly employed upon its daily
-work. Whether the influence of these causes, or of any of them, is
-increasing with that more complete democratization of government which
-we see going on in Europe, is a question that cannot yet be answered.
-Fifty years may be needed before it can be answered, for new tendencies
-both for good and for evil are constantly emerging and affecting one
-another in unpredictable ways.
-
-The remedies that may be applied to any defects in the working of
-governments are some of them Mechanical, some of them Ethical. By
-Mechanical remedies I understand those which consist in improving the
-structure or the customs and working devices of government, i. e.,
-the laws and the institutions or political methods, by Ethical those
-which affect the character and spirit of the people. If you want to
-get more work and better work done in any industry, you may either
-improve the machinery, or the implements, by which the work is done, or
-else improve the strength and skill of the men who run the machinery
-and use the tools. In doing the former, you sometimes do the latter
-also, for when the workman has finer tools, he is led on to attempt
-more difficult work, and thus not only does his own skill become more
-perfect, but his interest in the work is likely to be increased.
-
-Although in politics by far the most real and lasting progress may be
-expected from raising the intelligence and virtue of the citizens,
-still improvements in the machinery of government must not be
-undervalued. To take away from bad men the means and opportunities
-by which they may work evil, to furnish good men with means and
-opportunities which make it easier for them to prevent or overcome
-evil, is to render a great service. And as laws which breathe a high
-spirit help to educate the whole community, so does the presence of
-opportunities for reform stimulate and invigorate the best citizens in
-their efforts after better things.
-
-I will enumerate briefly some of the remedies that may be classed as
-Mechanical because they consist in alterations of institutions or
-methods.
-
-Two of these need only a few passing words, because they are so
-sweeping as to involve the whole fabric of government, and therefore
-too large to be discussed here.
-
-One is propounded by those thinkers whom, to distinguish them from the
-persons who announce themselves as enemies of all society, we may call
-the Philosophical Anarchists, thinkers who are entitled to respectful
-consideration because their doctrine represents a protest that needs
-to be made against the conception of an all-engulfing State in which
-individual initiative and self-guided development might be merged and
-lost. They desire to get rid of the defects of government by getting
-rid of government itself; that is to say, by leaving men entirely
-alone without any coercive control, trusting to their natural good
-impulses to restrain them from harming one another. In such a state
-of things there would be no Citizenship, properly so called, but only
-the isolation of families, or perhaps of individuals--for it is not
-quite clear how far the family is expected to remain in the Anarchist
-paradise--an isolation more or less qualified by brotherly love. We are
-so far at present from a prospect of reaching the conditions needed for
-such an amelioration that it is enough to note this view and pass on.
-
-A second and diametrically opposite cure for the evils of existing
-society comes from those who are commonly termed Socialists or
-Collectivists. It consists in so widely enlarging the functions of
-government as to commit to it not merely all the work it now performs
-of defending the country, maintaining order, enacting laws, and
-enforcing justice between man and man, but also the further work of
-producing and distributing all commodities, allotting to each man his
-proper labour and proper remuneration, or possibly, instead of giving
-any pecuniary remuneration, providing each man with what he needs for
-life. Under this régime two of the hindrances to good citizenship would
-be much reduced. There ought to be less indifference to politics when
-everybody’s interest in the management of public concerns had been
-immensely increased by the fact that he found himself dependent on
-the public officials for everything. Nobody could plead that he was
-occupied by his own private business, because his private business
-would have vanished. So also selfish personal interest in making gains
-out of government must needs disappear when private property itself
-had ceased to exist. Whether, however, self-interest might not still
-find means of influencing public administration in ways beneficial to
-individual cupidity, and whether personal selfishness might not be even
-more dangerous, under such conditions, in proportion to the extended
-range and power of government,--this is another question which cannot
-be discussed till some definite scheme for the allotment of work and of
-remuneration (if any) shall have been propounded. Party Spirit would
-evidently, in a Collectivistic State, pass into new forms. It might,
-however, become more potent than ever before. But that again would
-depend on the kind of scheme for the reshaping of economic society that
-had been adopted.
-
-We may pass from these suggestions for the extinction, or
-reconstruction on new lines, of the existing social and political
-system to certain minor devices for improving the structure and methods
-of government which have been put forward as likely to help the citizen
-to discharge his duties more efficiently.
-
-One of these is the system of Proportional Representation. It is argued
-that if electoral areas were created with more than two members
-each, and if each elector was either allowed to vote for a number
-of candidates less than the number to be chosen, or was allowed to
-concentrate all his votes upon one candidate, or more, according to the
-number to be chosen, two good results would follow. The will of the
-electors would be more adequately and exactly expressed, because the
-minority, or possibly more than one minority, as well as the majority,
-would have everywhere its representative. The zeal of the electors
-would be stimulated, because in each district a section of opinion not
-large enough to have a chance of winning an election, if there were
-but one member, and accordingly now apathetic, because without hope,
-would then be roused to organize itself and to take a warmer interest
-in public affairs. The Proportional system is, therefore, advocated
-as one of those improvements in machinery which would react upon the
-people by quickening the pulses of public life. Some experiments have
-already been made in this direction. Those tried in England did not
-win general approval and have been dropped. That which is still in
-operation in the State of Illinois has not, if my informants are right,
-given much satisfaction. But the plan is said to work well both in
-Belgium and in some of the cantons of Switzerland; so one may hope that
-further experiments will be attempted. It deserves your careful study,
-but it is too complicated and opens too many side issues to be further
-discussed now and here.[4]
-
- [4] Since the above was written a Royal Commission has been
- appointed in Britain to examine divers questions relating
- to elections, and is investigating this, among other plans.
-
-Attempts have been made in some places to overcome the indifference of
-citizens to their duty by fining those who, without sufficient excuse,
-fail to vote. This plan of Obligatory Voting, as it is called, finds
-favour in some Swiss cantons and in Belgium, but is too uncongenial to
-the habits of England or of the United States to be worth considering
-as a practical measure in either country. Moreover, the neglect to vote
-is no very serious evil in either country, at least as regards the more
-important elections. Swiss legislation on the subject is evidence not
-so much of indifference among the citizens of that country as of the
-high standard of public duty they are expected to reach.
-
-When we come to the proposals made both here and in England for the
-reference of proposals to a direct popular vote, we come to a question
-of real practical importance. I wish that I had time to state to
-you and to examine the arguments both for and against this mode of
-legislation, which has been practised for many years in Switzerland
-with a virtually unanimous approval, and has been applied pretty freely
-in some of your States. It has taken two forms. One is the so-called
-Initiative, under which a section of the electors (being a number,
-or a proportion, prescribed by law) may propose a law upon which the
-people vote. This is being tried in Switzerland, but so far as I have
-been able to gather, has not yet proved its utility. The balance of
-skilled opinion seems to incline against it. The other is called the
-Referendum, and consists in the submission to popular vote of measures
-already passed by the legislative body. In this form the reference of
-laws to the people undoubtedly sharpens the interest of the ordinary
-citizen in the conduct of public affairs. The Swiss voters, at any
-rate, take pains to inform themselves on the merits of the measures
-submitted to them. These are widely and acutely canvassed at public
-meetings, and in the press. A large vote is usually cast, and all,
-whether or no they approve the result, agree that it is an intelligent,
-not a heedless, vote. The Swiss do not seem to think that the power and
-dignity of the legislature is weakened, as some might expect it to be,
-when their final voice is thus superseded by that of the people. All I
-need now ask you to note and remember is that the practice of bringing
-political issues directly before the people, whatever its drawbacks,
-does tend to diminish both that indolence and indifference which is
-pretty common among European voters. It requires every citizen to think
-for himself and deliver his vote upon all the more important measures,
-and it also reduces the power of that Party Spirit which everywhere
-distracts men’s minds from the real merits of the questions before
-the country. When a law is submitted to the Swiss people for their
-judgment, their decision nowise affects either the Executive or the
-Legislature. The law may be rejected by the people, but the officials
-who drafted the law continue to hold office. The party which brought it
-in and carried it through the Legislature is not deemed to have been
-censured or weakened by the fact of its ultimate rejection. That party
-spirit is less strong in Switzerland than in any other free country
-(except perhaps Norway) may be largely attributed to this disjunction
-of the deciding voice in legislation from those governmental organs
-which every political party seeks to control. The Swiss voter is to-day
-an exceptionally intelligent and patriotic citizen, fitter to exercise
-the function of direct legislation than perhaps any other citizen in
-Europe, and the practice of directly legislating has doubtless helped
-to train him for the function.
-
-It must, however, be admitted that the circumstances of that little
-republic and its cantons are too peculiar to make it safe to draw
-inferences from Swiss experience to large countries like Britain and
-France, the political life of which is highly centralized. The States
-of your Union may appear to offer a better field, and the results
-of the various experiments which some of them (such as Oklahoma) are
-trying will be watched with interest by Europeans.
-
-In considering the harm done to civic duty by selfish personal
-interests we were led to observe that the fewer points of contact
-between government and the pecuniary interests of private citizens,
-the better both for the purity of government and for the conscience of
-the private citizen. How far government ought to include within its
-functions schemes for increasing national wealth, otherwise than by
-such means (being means which a government alone can employ because
-to be effective they must be done on a great scale) as the improving
-of education, the diffusing of knowledge, the providing means of
-transportation, the conservation of natural resources, and so forth,
-may be matter for debate. But at any rate government ought to avoid
-measures tending to enrich any one person or group of persons at the
-expense of the citizens generally. Common justice requires that.
-Accordingly, all contracts should be made on the terms best for the
-public, and if possible by open bidding. Franchises, if not reserved
-by the public authority for itself, should be granted only for limited
-times and so as to secure the interests of the community, whether by
-way of a rent payable to the city or county treasury or otherwise.
-Public employees should not be made into a privileged class, to
-which there is given larger pay than other workers of the same class
-and capacity receive. All bills promoted by a private person, firm,
-or company looking to his or their pecuniary advantage ought to be
-closely scrutinized by some responsible public authority. In England
-we draw a sharp distinction between such bills and general public
-legislation, and we submit the former to a quasi-judicial examination
-by a Parliamentary committee in order to avoid possible jobs or
-scandals or losses to the public. As respects general legislation,
-i. e., that which is not in its terms local or personal, it may be
-difficult or impossible to prevent a law from incidentally benefiting
-one group or class of men and injuring another. But everything that
-can be done ought to be done to prevent any set of men from abusing
-legislation to serve their own interest. If there be truth in what
-one hears about the groups which in France, Belgium, and Germany have,
-through political pressure, obtained by law bounties benefiting their
-industries, or tariffs specially favourable to their own commercial
-enterprises, the danger that the general taxpayer, or the consumer, may
-be sacrificed to these private interests, is a real danger. To remove
-the occasion and the opportunities for the exercise of such pressure,
-which is likely to be often exerted in a covert way and to warp or
-pervert the legislator’s mind, is to diminish a temptation and to
-remove a stumbling block that lies in the path of civic duty. Whether
-a man be in theory a Protectionist or a Free Trader, whether or not he
-desires to nationalize public utilities, he must recognize the dangers
-incident to the passing of laws which influential groups of wealthy
-men may have a personal interest in promoting or resisting, because
-they offer a prospect of gain sufficiently large to make it worth while
-to “get at” legislatures and officials. Such dangers arise in all
-governments. That which makes them formidable in democracies is the
-fact that the interest of each individual citizen in protecting himself
-and the public against the selfish groups may be so small an interest
-that everybody neglects it, and the groups get their way.
-
-As we have been considering improvements in the machinery of
-government, this would be a fitting place for a discussion of what you
-call Primary Election Laws, which are intended both to reduce the power
-of party organizations and to stimulate the personal zeal of the voter
-by making it easier for him to influence the selection of a candidate.
-We have, however, in Europe, nothing corresponding to the Primary
-Laws of American States, nothing which recognizes a political party
-as a concrete body, nothing which deals with the mode of selecting
-candidates; and many of you doubtless know better than I do what has
-been the effect of these American enactments and whether they have
-really roused the ordinary citizen to bestir himself and to assert
-his independence of such party organizations as may have heretofore
-interfered with it. Europeans do not take kindly to the notion of
-giving statutory recognition to a Party, and they doubt whether the
-astuteness of those whom you call “machine politicians” may not succeed
-in getting hold of the new statutory Primaries as they did of the old
-ones. Be the merits of the new legislation what they may, one must hope
-that its existence will not induce the friends of reform to relax their
-efforts to reduce in other ways the power of political “Machines.”
-
-One obvious expedient to which good citizens may resort for keeping
-other citizens up to the mark is to be found in the enactment and
-enforcement of stringent laws against breaches of public trust. I
-took occasion, in referring to the practices of bribery and treating
-at elections, to note the wholesome effect of the statute passed in
-England in 1883 for repressing those offences. Although St. Paul has
-told us that he who is under grace does not need to be under the
-law, Christianity has not yet gone far enough to enable any of us to
-dispense with the moral force law can exert, both directly through
-the penalties it imposes and indirectly through the type of conduct
-which it exhorts the community to maintain. Laws may do much to raise
-and sustain the tone of all the persons engaged in public affairs as
-officials or as legislators, not only by appealing to their conscience,
-but by giving them a quick and easy reply to those who seek improper
-favours from them. A statute may express the best conscience of the
-whole people and set the standard they approve, even where the practice
-of most individuals falls short of the standard. If the prosecuting
-authorities and the courts do their duty unflinchingly, without regard
-to the social position of the offender, a statute may bring the
-practice of ordinary men up to the level of that collective conscience
-of the nation which it embodies.
-
-In every walk of life a class of persons constantly subject to a
-particular set of temptations is apt to form habits, due to the
-pressure of those temptations, which are below what the conscience
-of the better men in the community approves. The aim of legislation,
-as expressing that best conscience of the whole community, ought to
-be to correct or extirpate those habits and make each particular
-class understand that it is not to be excused because it has special
-temptations and thinks its own sins venial. Even the men who yield
-to the temptations peculiar to their own class are willing to join
-in condemning those who yield to some other kind of temptation. Thus
-the “better conscience” may succeed in screwing up one class after
-another to a higher level. But the enactment of a law is not enough.
-It must be strictly enforced. Procedure must be prompt. Juries must
-be firm. Technicalities must not be suffered to obstruct the march of
-justice. Sentences must be carried out, else the statute will become,
-as statutes often have become, a record of aspiration rather than of
-accomplishment.
-
-To contrive plans by which the interest of the citizen in public
-affairs shall be aroused and sustained, is far easier than to induce
-the citizen to use and to go on using, year in and year out, the
-contrivances and opportunities provided for his benefit. Yet it is
-from the heart and will of the citizen that all real and lasting
-improvements must proceed. In the words of the Gospel, it is the inside
-of the cup and platter that must be made clean. The central problem of
-civic duty is the ethical problem. Indifference, selfish interests, the
-excesses of party spirit, will all begin to disappear as civic life is
-lifted on to a higher plane, and as the number of those who, standing
-on that higher plane, will apply a strict test to their own conduct and
-to that of their leaders, realizing and striving to discharge their
-responsibilities, goes on steadily increasing until they come to form
-the majority of the people. What we have called “the better conscience”
-must be grafted on to the “wild stock” of the natural Average Man.
-
-How is this to be done? The difficulty is the same as that which meets
-the social reformer or the preacher of religion.
-
-One must try to reach the Will through the Soul. The most obvious way
-to begin is through the education of those who are to be citizens,
-moral education combined with and made the foundation for instruction
-in civic duty. This is a task which the Swiss alone among European
-nations seem to have seriously undertaken. Here in America it has
-become doubly important through the recent entrance into your
-community of a vast mass of immigrants, most of them ignorant of our
-language, still more of them ignorant, not only of your institutions,
-but of the general principles and habits of free government. Most of
-them doubtless belong to races of high natural intelligence, and many
-of them have the simple virtues of the peasant. You are providing
-for all of them good schools, and their children will soon become
-Americans in speech and habits, quite patriotic enough so far as
-flag-waving goes. But they will not so soon or so completely acquire
-your intellectual and moral standard, or imbibe your historical and
-religious traditions. There is no fear but what they will quickly learn
-to vote. To some Europeans you seem to have been overconfident in
-intrusting them with a power which most of them cannot yet have learned
-to use wisely. That however you have done, and as you hold that it
-cannot now be undone, your task must now be to teach them, if you can,
-to understand your institutions, to think about the vote they have to
-give, and to realize the responsibilities which the suffrage implies
-as these were realized by your New England forefathers when they
-planted free commonwealths in the wilderness nearly three centuries ago.
-
-Valuable as instruction may be in fitting the citizen to comprehend and
-judge upon the issues which his vote determines, there must also be the
-will to apply his knowledge for the public good. What appeal shall be
-made to him?
-
-We--I say “we” because this is our task in Europe no less than it is
-yours here--we may appeal to his enlightened self-interest, making
-self-interest so enlightened that it loses its selfish quality. We can
-remind him of all the useful work which governments may accomplish when
-they are conducted by the right men in the right spirit. Take, for
-instance, the work to be performed in those cities wherein so large and
-increasing a part of the population now dwell. How much remains to be
-done to make cities healthier, to secure better dwellings for the poor,
-to root out nests of crime, to remove the temptations to intemperance
-and gambling, to bring within the reach of the poorest all possible
-facilities both for intellectual progress and for enjoying the
-pleasures of art and music! How much may we do so to adorn the city
-with parks and public buildings as to make its external aspect instil
-the sense of beauty into its inhabitants and give them a fine pride
-in it! These are some of the tasks which cannot safely be intrusted
-to a municipality unless its government is above suspicion, unless
-men of probity and capacity are placed in power, unless the whole
-community extends its sympathy to the work and keeps a vigilant eye
-upon all the officials. Municipal governments cannot be encouraged to
-own public utilities so long as there is a risk that somebody may own
-municipal governments. Have we not here a strong motive for securing
-purity and efficiency in city administration? Is it not the personal
-interest of every one of us that the city we dwell in should be such
-as I have sought to describe? Nothing makes more for happiness than to
-see others around one happy. The rich residents need not grudge--nor
-indeed would your rich residents grudge, for there is less grumbling
-among the rich tax payers here than in Europe--taxation which they
-could see was being honestly spent for the benefit of the city. The
-interest each one of us has as a member of a city or a nation in seeing
-our fellow-citizens healthy, peaceful, and happy is a greater interest,
-if it be measured in terms of our own real enjoyment of life, than is
-that interest, of which we so constantly are reminded, which we have
-in making the State either wealthy by the development of trade, or
-formidable to foreign countries by its armaments.
-
-We may also appeal to every citizen’s sense of dignity and
-self-respect. We may bid him recollect that he is the heir of rights
-and privileges which you and our ancestors fought for, and which
-place him, whatever his birth or fortune, among the rulers of his
-country. He is unworthy of himself, unmindful of what he owes to the
-Constitution that has given him these functions, if he does not try to
-discharge them worthily. These considerations are no doubt familiar to
-us Englishmen and Americans, though we may not always feel their force
-as deeply as we ought. To the new immigrants of whom I have already
-spoken they are unfamiliar; yet to the best among these also they have
-sometimes powerfully appealed. You had, in the last generation, no more
-high-minded and patriotic citizen than the German exile of 1849, the
-late Mr. Carl Schurz.
-
-When every motive has been invoked, and every expedient applied that
-can stimulate the sense of civic duty, one never can feel sure that
-the desired result will follow. The moral reformer and the preacher
-of religion have the same experience. The ebbs and flows of ethical
-life are beyond the reach of scientific prediction. There are times
-of awakening, “times of refreshing from the presence of the Lord,” as
-your Puritan ancestors said, but we do not know when they will come nor
-can we explain why they come just when they do. Every man can recall
-moments in his own life when the sky seemed to open above him, and when
-his vision was so quickened that all things stood transfigured in a
-purer and brighter radiance, when duty, and even toil done for the sake
-of duty, seemed beautiful and full of joy.
-
-You remember Wordsworth’s lines--
-
- “Hence, in a season of fair weather,
- Though inland far we be,
- Our souls have sight of that celestial sea
- That brought us hither.”
-
-If we survey the wide field of European history, we shall find that
-something like this happens with nations also. They, too, have moments
-of exaltation, moments of depression. Their ideals rise and fall. They
-are for a time filled with a spirit which seeks truth, which loves
-honour, which is ready for self-sacrifice; and after a time the light
-begins to fade from the hills and this spirit lingers only among the
-best souls.
-
-Such a spirit is sometimes evoked by a great national crisis which
-thrills all hearts. This happened to England or at least to a large
-part of the people of England, in the seventeenth century. It happened
-to Germany in the days of the War of Liberation, and to Italy when
-she was striving to expel the Austrians and the petty princes who
-ruled by Austria’s help. You here felt it during the War of Secession.
-Sometimes, and usually at one of these crises, a great man stands out
-who helps to raise the feeling of his people and inspire them with his
-own lofty thoughts and aims. Such a man was Mazzini, seventy years
-ago in Italy. Such were Washington and Lincoln, the former more by his
-example than by his words, the latter by both, yet most by the quiet
-patience, dignity, and hopefulness which he showed in the darkest
-hours. Nations respond to the appeal which such a man makes to their
-best instincts. He typifies for the moment whatever is highest in them.
-
-Unhappily, with nations as with individuals, there is apt to be a
-relapse from these loftier moods into the old common ways when selfish
-interest and trivial pleasures resume their sway. There comes a sort
-of reaction from the stress of virtue and strenuous high-soaring
-effort. Everything looks gray and dull. The divine light has died out
-of the sky. This, too, is an oft-repeated lesson of European history.
-Yet the reaction and decline are not inevitable. When an individual
-man has been raised above himself by some spiritual impulse, he is
-sometimes able to hold the ground he has won. His will may have been
-strengthened. He has learnt to control the meaner desires. The impulse
-that stirred him is not wholly spent, because the nobler thoughts and
-acts which it prompted have become a habit with him. So, too, with
-a nation. What habits are to the individual man, that, to a nation,
-are its Traditions. They are the memories of the Past turned into
-the standards of the Present. High traditions go to form a code of
-honour, which speaks with authority to the sense of honour. Whoever
-transgresses that code is felt to be unworthy of the nation, unfit to
-hold that place in its respect and confidence which the great ones
-of the days of old have held. Pride in the glorious foretime of the
-race and in its heroes sustains in the individual man who is called
-to public duty, the personal pride which makes him feel that all his
-affections and all his emotions stand rooted in the sense of honour,
-which is, for the man and for the nation, the foundation of all virtue.
-
-We have seen in our own time, in the people of Japan, a striking
-example of what the passionate attachment to a national ideal can do
-in war to intensify the sense of duty and self-sacrifice. A similar
-example is held up to us by those who have recorded the earlier annals
-of Rome. The deepest moral they teach is the splendid power which the
-love of Rome and the idea of what her children owed to her exercised
-over her great citizens, enabling them to set shining examples of
-devotion to the city which the world has admired ever since. Each
-example evoked later examples in later generations, till at last in
-a changed community, its upper class demoralized by wealth and power
-even more than it was torn by discord, its lower classes corrupted
-by the upper and looking on their suffrage as a means of gain, the
-ancient traditions died out. Whoever, studying the conditions of modern
-European democracies, sees the infinite fatalities which popular
-government in large countries full of rich men and of opportunities for
-acquiring riches, offers for the perversion of government to private
-selfish ends, will often feel that those European States which have
-maintained the highest standard of civic purity have done it in respect
-of their Traditions. Were these to be weakened, the fabric might
-crumble into dust.
-
-Every new generation as it comes up can make the traditions which it
-finds better or worse. If its imagination is touched and its emotions
-stirred by all that is finest in the history of its country, it learns
-to live up to the ideals set before it, and thus it strengthens the
-best standards of conduct it has inherited and prolongs the reverence
-felt for them.
-
-The responsibility for forming ideals and fixing standards does not
-belong to statesmen alone. It belongs, and now perhaps more largely
-than ever before, to the intellectual leaders of the nation, and
-especially to those who address the people in the universities and
-through the press. Teachers, writers, journalists, are forming the
-mind of modern nations to an extent previously unknown. Here they
-have opportunities such as have existed never before, nor in any
-other country, for trying to inspire the nation with a love of truth
-and honour, with a sense of the high obligations of citizenship, and
-especially of those who hold public office.
-
-Of the power which the daily press exerts upon the thought and the
-tastes of the people through the matter it scatters among them, and
-of the grave import of the choice it has always and everywhere to make
-between the serious treatment of public issues and that cheap cynicism
-which so many readers find amusing, there is no need to speak here. You
-know better than I do how far those who direct the press realize and
-try to discharge the responsibilities which attach to their power.
-
-The observer who seeks to discern and estimate the forces working for
-good or evil that mark the spirit and tendencies of an age, finds it
-easiest to do this by noting the changes which have occurred within
-his own memory. To-day everyone seems to dwell upon the growth not
-only of luxury, but of the passion for amusement, and most of those
-who can look back thirty or forty years find in this growth grounds
-for discouragement. I deny neither the fact nor the significance of
-the auguries that it suggests. But let us also note a hopeful sign
-manifest during the last twenty years both here and in England. It
-is the diffusion among the educated and richer classes of a warmer
-feeling of sympathy and a stronger feeling of responsibility for the
-less fortunate sections of the community. There is more of a sense
-of brotherhood, more of a desire to help, more of a discontent with
-those arrangements of society which press hardly on the common man
-than there was forty years ago. This altruistic spirit which is now
-everywhere visible in the field of private philanthropic work, seems
-likely to spread into the field of civic action also, and may there
-become a new motive power. It has already become a more efficient force
-in legislation than it ever was before. We may well hope that it will
-draw more and more of those who love and seek to help their fellow-men
-into that legislative and administrative work whose opportunities for
-grappling with economic and social problems become every day greater.
-
-Here in America I am told in nearly every city I visit that the young
-men are more and more caring for and bestirring themselves to discharge
-their civic duties. That is the best news one can hear. Surely no
-country makes so clear a call upon her citizens to work for her as
-yours does. Think of the wide-spreading results which good solid work
-produces on so vast a community, where everything achieved for good
-in one place is quickly known and may be quickly imitated in another.
-Think of the advantages for the development of the highest civilization
-which the boundless resources of your territory provide. Think of that
-principle of the Sovereignty of the People which you have carried
-further than it was ever carried before and which requires and inspires
-and, indeed, compels you to endeavour to make the whole people fit to
-bear a weight and discharge a task such as no other multitude of men
-ever yet undertook. Think of the sense of fraternity, also without
-precedent in any other great nation, which binds all Americans together
-and makes it easier here than elsewhere for each citizen to meet every
-other citizen as an equal upon a common ground. One who, coming from
-the Old World, remembers the greater difficulties the Old World has
-to face, rejoices to think how much, with all these advantages, the
-youth of America, such youth as I see here to-night in this venerable
-university, may accomplish for the future of your country. Nature
-has done her best to provide a foundation whereon the fabric of an
-enlightened and steadily advancing civilization may be reared. It is
-for you to build upon that foundation. Free from many of the dangers
-that surround the States of Europe, you have unequalled opportunities
-for showing what a high spirit of citizenship--zealous, intelligent,
-disinterested--may do for the happiness and dignity of a mighty nation,
-enabling it to become what its founders hoped it might be--a model for
-other peoples more lately emerged into the sunlight of freedom.
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber’s Note
-
-
-Page 48: “Americans” was printed as “Ameritans”, and changed here,
-presuming it was a typographical error.
-
-
-*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PROMOTING GOOD
-CITIZENSHIP ***
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the
-United States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
- you are located before using this eBook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that:
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without
-widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.