summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/67634-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/67634-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/67634-0.txt1536
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1536 deletions
diff --git a/old/67634-0.txt b/old/67634-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index dc4dced..0000000
--- a/old/67634-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,1536 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg eBook of Report of the sanitary committee of
-the commissioners of sewers of the city of London, together with a
-report of the medical officer of health on the objections raised by the
-Butchers' Trade Society to the bye-laws proposed for the regulation of
-slaughter-houses, by Wm. Sedgwick Saunders
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
-will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before
-using this eBook.
-
-Title: Report of the sanitary committee of the commissioners of sewers
- of the city of London, together with a report of the medical
- officer of health on the objections raised by the Butchers' Trade
- Society to the bye-laws proposed for the regulation of
- slaughter-houses
-
-Author: Wm. Sedgwick Saunders
-
-Release Date: March 15, 2022 [eBook #67634]
-
-Language: English
-
-Produced by: deaurider and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
- https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
- generously made available by The Internet Archive)
-
-*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK REPORT OF THE SANITARY
-COMMITTEE OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF SEWERS OF THE CITY OF LONDON, TOGETHER
-WITH A REPORT OF THE MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH ON THE OBJECTIONS RAISED
-BY THE BUTCHERS' TRADE SOCIETY TO THE BYE-LAWS PROPOSED FOR THE
-REGULATION OF SLAUGHTER-HOUSES ***
-
-
-
-
-
- REPORT
-
- OF THE
-
- SANITARY COMMITTEE
-
- OF THE
-
- COMMISSIONERS OF SEWERS OF THE CITY OF LONDON,
-
- TOGETHER WITH A
-
- REPORT
-
- OF THE
-
- MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH
-
- ON
-
- THE OBJECTIONS RAISED BY THE BUTCHERS’
- TRADE SOCIETY TO THE BYE-LAWS PROPOSED FOR
- THE REGULATION OF
-
- SLAUGHTER-HOUSES.
-
- LONDON:
- CHARLES SKIPPER & EAST, PRINTERS, ST. DUNSTAN’S HILL, E.C.
-
- 1876.
-
-
-
-
- _At a Meeting of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of London,
- held at the Guildhall, on Tuesday, the 4th day of July, 1876,_
-
- FREDERICK COX, ESQ., IN THE CHAIR.
-
-
-A Report from the Sanitary Committee (WILLIAM CAVE FOWLER, Esq.,
-Deputy, Deputy-Chairman), dated this day, was read--
-
-On the Reference of the 23rd of May last, to consider the Letter
-from the Local Government Board relative to the Slaughter-house
-Bye-laws agreed to on the 14th of March last, and submitted to the
-Local Government Board for confirmation, and on the objections of the
-Butchers’ Trade Society to the said Bye-laws.
-
-Submitting a Report from the Medical Officer of Health in reply to
-the said objections, and recommending the Commissioners’ concurrence
-therein.
-
-
-RESOLVED--
-
-That this Court doth agree with the Committee in their said Report, and
-doth confirm and adopt the same.
-
-
-ORDERED--
-
-That a Copy of the Medical Officer’s Report be sent to the Local
-Government Board in reply to their Communications therein referred to.
-
-
-ORDERED--
-
-That the Report be printed, and circulated as usual.
-
- HENRY BLAKE,
- _Principal Clerk_.
-
-
-
-
- REPORT
- OF THE
- SANITARY COMMITTEE.
-
-
-We have, in accordance with your Reference to us of the 23rd May
-last, considered the letter from the Local Government Board, dated
-the 13th of May, relative to the new Bye-laws for the management
-of Slaughter-houses within the City of London, agreed to by your
-Honourable Court on the 14th of March last, and submitted to the Local
-Government Board for confirmation. Also we have carefully considered
-the letter of Messrs. Crouch and Spencer, with objections on behalf of
-the Butchers’ Trade Society, to the said Bye-laws, enclosed in the said
-letter from the Local Government Board for your observations.
-
-We requested the Medical Officer of Health to give a detailed Report
-in regard to the objections raised by the Butchers’ Trade Society to
-the said Bye-laws, and we beg now to submit the same to your Honourable
-Court.
-
-We have carefully considered the said Report, with the Bye-laws, and
-the said communications from the Local Government Board.
-
-We have also received and considered a further communication from the
-Local Government Board, with copy of a letter from Messrs. Crouch and
-Spencer, enclosing further objections on behalf of the Butchers’ Trade
-Society to the said Bye-laws, also a Report from a Dr. Whitmore, and
-letters from certain residents of Aldgate in support of such objections.
-
-We beg to recommend that your Honourable Court concur in the Report of
-the Medical Officer of Health, and that a copy thereof be forwarded to
-the Local Government Board in reply to their communication of the 13th
-ulto.
-
-The effect of this will be, to adhere to the several proposed Bye-laws,
-except that as regards Bye-law No. 10, which is as follows:--
-
- “That the internal surface of the roofs and upper portions of the
- walls of the Slaughter-houses and Pounds, above the 7 ft. 6 in. of
- impermeable surface, be washed with quicklime at least once every
- month.”
-
-It is suggested that it may be so far relaxed, that the monthly
-limewhiting be required in the summer only, say from May to October,
-and that in the winter months, say from November to April, the
-limewhiting be required to be done once in three months.
-
-And as regards Bye-law No. 18, which is as follows:--
-
- “That in case of any diseased or unsound cattle being brought to a
- Slaughter-house, Pound, or Lair, the occupier shall forthwith give
- information thereof to the Medical Officer of Health of the City of
- London.”
-
-It is proposed not to insist upon the retention of the word “unsound,”
-provided that the animals be slaughtered within a specified time of the
-occurrence of any accident that may disable them.
-
-All which we submit to the judgment of your Honourable Court.
-
-Dated this 4th day of July, 1876.
-
- (Signed) FREDᴷ. COX.
- W. C. FOWLER.
- H. H. HEATH.
- W. I. LOWE.
-
-
-
-
- REPORT
- OF THE
- MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH.
-
-
- _To the Sanitary Committee of the Honourable
- the Commissioners of Sewers._
-
- GENTLEMEN,
-
-In compliance with your request that I should “give a detailed Report
-in regard to the objections raised by the ‘Butchers’ Trade Society’
-to the proposed ‘Bye-laws’” for the better conduct and regulation of
-Slaughter-houses within the City of London, agreed to by the Honourable
-the Court of Sewers, and submitted by them to the Local Government
-Board for confirmation, and which “objections” were contained in a
-letter forwarded to the said Board by the said Society, a copy of which
-was sent to your Committee by the said Board for your consideration and
-observations thereon, I beg to offer the following remarks:
-
-There are 27 Slaughter-houses in the City of London, viz.: 24 in
-Aldgate,[1] 1 in Bishopsgate, 1 in Farringdon, and 1 in Cripplegate
-Ward: of these the following observations apply exclusively to Aldgate,
-no “objections” to the Bye-laws having been expressed by the occupiers
-of the remaining three.
-
-The Bye-laws referred to were framed with a full knowledge of
-the intended, and indeed threatened, opposition on the part of
-the slaughterers and butchers of Aldgate, and every “objection”
-mentioned in their letter to the Local Government Board was fully
-and dispassionately discussed by your Committee during many lengthy
-sittings, at each of which they invited, and were favoured by, the
-presence of the Deputy of the Ward in which the Slaughter-houses are
-situated.
-
-This gentleman ably and forcibly supported the views propounded by the
-butchers, and evinced the keenest anxiety to protect their interests.
-
-Subsequently your recommendations respecting these Bye-laws were
-adopted with surprising unanimity by the Honourable the Court of Sewers
-without amendment or alteration; a number of Commissioners then being
-present who are immediately interested in the butchering business, and
-practically acquainted with its wants, concurring in their acceptance.
-
-The initial difficulty in dealing with this question arises from the
-anomalous conditions as to size, number, and areas, to be found in the
-Slaughter-houses and adjoining premises at Aldgate.
-
-The twenty-four Slaughter-houses in Aldgate are, with one or two
-exceptions, situated side by side; all have a direct communication with
-a shop facing High Street, Whitechapel, and six of them have no other
-means for the entrance of cattle than by their being driven across the
-footways and through the shop; a practice which renders the pavement
-at times impassable, and causes terror and annoyance to the public.
-These shops are for the most part low in ceiling height, and very
-narrow in frontage, =one being but 9 ft. wide,--two 10 ft.,--one 10 ft.
-6 in.,--two 11 ft.=,--and so on. In some of them the Slaughter-house
-widens in the back part of the premises, but in several, viz., at Nos.
-55, 58, 59, 60, 68, and 73, the whole business of a retail butcher and
-slaughterer is conducted in the narrow strips above quoted.
-
-Your Committee having viewed these places, will recollect that at No.
-73, where the extreme width of the Shop and Slaughter-house was but 9
-ft., there was no room to pass up and down the Slaughter-house when the
-carcasses of the slaughtered animals were hanging, excepting by moving
-sideways, and that the atmosphere of the place was pervaded by a hot,
-moist, sickening vapour, for want of thorough ventilation; you must
-also have remarked upon the general state of disrepair of the whole
-of these Slaughter-houses, the dilapidated roofs, the blood-stained
-and filthy state of the side walls, the uneven and broken condition
-of the flooring, the imperfect, totally inadequate, and badly placed
-water supply, the large accumulations of dung, offal, and blood, and
-the defective and sluggish drainage, down the gratings of which you
-could not fail to have seen a plentiful flow of crude liquid manure,
-which the man in charge was industriously sweeping into the sewers,
-to their great pollution; all these indicate a state of neglect which
-could only have arisen from a consciousness on the part of the owners
-and occupiers that the Legislature intended to abolish such places as
-private Slaughter-houses upon the expiration of the Act of 1844, 7th
-and 8th Vict., c. 84. Unfortunately, however, the so-called vested
-interests of the butchers proved too strong with the Government for the
-protection of the public, and Parliament in 1874, by the 37th and 38th
-Vict., c. 67, was induced to perpetuate these Slaughter-houses in the
-City of London, under such regulations it is your province to make and
-maintain.
-
-In order to be consistent, and to enable the Court of Sewers to
-exercise a proper amount of control, each Slaughter-house must be
-treated as a separate and independent building; and, in advising you as
-to the best mode of securing such control, it has ever been a source
-of deep anxiety and considerable embarrassment to me, how best to
-reconcile the wants of modern sanitation, decency, and order, with the
-inevitable sacrifices on the part of the occupiers of the smallest
-of these places, which I foresee and confess to be demanded by the
-institution of thorough disciplinary measures.
-
-The necessity for treating each Slaughter-house as a distinct
-structure “_per se_,” and the apparent consciousness of the inability
-of the holders of the smaller ones to adapt themselves to efficient
-regulations, is, I believe, the main cause of the opposition now made
-to the Bye-laws, for I have reason to know that the occupiers of the
-larger Slaughter-houses are ready to conform to the spirit of the
-Bye-laws, albeit they are not in accord with us as to some of the
-provisions therein.
-
-Under the peculiar and exceptional circumstances of the case before
-us, the question of dimensions so completely underlies the whole
-contention, that I earnestly hope your Committee will call the
-particular attention of the Local Government Board to the _size_ of
-these small Slaughter-houses, as shown on the Plan made to scale by
-your Engineer, and forwarded to the Board some time ago [a copy of
-which, upon a reduced scale, is appended hereto]; for I can scarcely
-imagine that the Board have the least idea of the diminutive space
-in which slaughtering _on a large scale is going on night and day_ in
-defiance of the principles of health or humanity.
-
-The Board should also be informed that the slaughtering effected in
-these places extends far beyond the requirements of the neighbourhood,
-and that the plea of the Butchers that they provide marketable
-commodities suitable to the necessities of the poor of their locality
-is essentially unsound, from an economical point of view, it having
-been found in places where Abattoirs obtain, that the poor readily
-follow any market which offers them pecuniary advantages.
-
-I now proceed to notice the various “objections” advanced in the letter
-of the “Butchers’ Trade Society”:--They relate, for the most part, to
-the _structural_ repairs rendered necessary by the present ruinous
-condition of the Aldgate Slaughter-houses generally, which, in spite of
-admitted neglect, due to their owners having expected their demolition
-in 1874, when the Act of 1834 affecting Slaughter-houses expired, are
-now resisted upon the score of expense.
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[1] These Slaughter-houses are really in Portsoken Ward, but they are
-always quoted as of Aldgate Ward, and will be so described in this
-Report to avoid confusion.
-
-
-
-
-REPLY TO “OBJECTIONS” OF THE “BUTCHERS’ TRADE SOCIETY” TO THE BYE-LAWS.
-
-
-BYE-LAW I.
-
-That each Slaughter-house be paved with asphalte, laid with proper
-slopes and channels towards a trapped gully, and, where practicable,
-such gully shall be outside the Slaughter-house and Pound.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.[2]
-
-_The Butchers demur, firstly, to the use of asphalte, and, secondly, to
-the gully being placed outside the Slaughter-house._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The reason for insisting upon _asphalte_ is to avoid _joints_, which
-are inevitable in every other kind of pavement.
-
-The joints in stone pavements, however well laid, cannot be made
-durable, owing to the frequent concussions produced by the animals
-falling heavily and suddenly when pole-axed, and the joints being once
-cracked or broken readily admit through their interstices every kind of
-liquid filth, which accumulates in the subsoil and decomposes there.
-
-The flooring of the present Slaughter-houses in Aldgate is composed of
-small, and badly laid, flag-stones, &c., which are loose, broken, and
-uneven in many places, and which cannot be properly cleansed on account
-of the inequalities of the surfaces.
-
-The retention of this Bye-law will, of course, prevent the replacement
-of the old flag-stones upon the reconstruction of the Slaughter-houses,
-and involve the owners in some expense.
-
-A smooth jointless pavement for Slaughter-houses was unanimously
-considered the best at a meeting of the Royal Institute of British
-Architects, in a discussion which followed the reading of a paper by
-Mr. Darbyshire, on Public Abattoirs, 1st February, 1875.
-
-The Metropolitan Board of Works is quoted by the “Butchers’ Trade
-Society” as sanctioning the use of flag-stones, but this is scarcely
-ingenuous, the truth being that the Board recommend _asphalte_ in
-the _first instance_, but allow flag-stones set in cement as an
-_alternative_.
-
-The advantage of placing the gully _outside_ the Slaughter-houses, is
-that it prevents the admission of solid matters into the drains, and
-provided the floor be laid at a proper inclination towards the door,
-all fluid materials can be readily conducted thence by gravitation into
-the drain beyond, by means of sunken stone channels, or cast-iron boxes
-having hinges, without the creation of unavoidable nuisance. These
-channels should be provided at certain intervals with what are termed
-“grids,” which prevent anything but liquids passing into the drain or
-sewer.
-
-“The _grids_ are hinged to fall back against the walls, and, on being
-opened, reveal a cast-iron box or chamber, with a flange all round the
-top edge, which rests on a rebate cast on the outer shell; this box
-is movable, and is perforated through the bottom and sides; under
-the movable box is another chamber opening direct into the trap,
-which is cast to the outer shell of the frame work.”--(Darbyshire on
-Abattoirs.)--These grids are in daily use at Manchester and elsewhere,
-and are made by Bunnett and Co.
-
-The scavengers should attend to the movable boxes at regular intervals,
-and cart away all solid matter.
-
-In the Edinburgh Abattoirs there are “two distinct sets of drains, one
-for the surface water, which is conveyed directly into Lochrin burn,
-the other for the soil, which is conveyed into large tanks, prepared
-for its reception, and sold for agricultural purposes.” (_Encyclopædia
-Britannica._)
-
-It is impossible to over-estimate the importance of excluding blood,
-offal or dung, &c., from the sewers at all times, but especially in
-seasons of epidemic zymotic diseases, and it would be an inestimable
-boon, and one by no means difficult of accomplishment, if the Scotch
-system could be imitated at Aldgate.
-
-
-BYE-LAW II.
-
-That each Slaughter-house be drained by a glazed pipe drain, not less
-than six inches in diameter, set in concrete and jointed in cement,
-or otherwise made impermeable, and communicating directly with the
-public sewer. That the gully at the inlet to the drain be trapped
-with a stoneware syphon-trap, or other trap of approved material and
-construction, and be covered with a grating, the bars of which shall
-not be more than three-eighths of an inch apart; the grating to be
-fastened with a lock and key, and kept at all times locked, unless
-opened for cleansing or repair.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_That “it is very doubtful whether setting the drain pipes in
-cement, whereby they cannot be got at, except by great breakage and
-disturbance, is at all advantageous.”_
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The advantages claimed for setting the drain pipes in, and upon cement,
-are durability and strength; and if a pipe of six inches diameter be
-used, there is but little liability of its becoming choked or requiring
-repair for many years. Drain pipes laid on soft subsoil materials
-frequently break asunder from the subsidence of such a matrix, or from
-heavy weights falling suddenly upon them, from above, and our daily
-sanitary work furnishes abundant evidence of the danger to health
-arising from the fracture of drain pipes, where originally placed upon
-improper ground, and especially when under such circumstances they are
-subjected to violent blows.
-
-In Edinburgh the Slaughter-houses are “laid with a thick well-dressed
-pavement, resting on a stratum of concrete twelve inches thick.”
-
-
-BYE-LAW IV.
-
-That each Slaughter-house be provided with adequate cisternage and
-water supply, or, where practicable, with a _constant_ supply of water,
-and such arrangement of pipes as will enable the pavement and the walls
-to the height of 7 feet 6 inches to be conveniently and quickly washed.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_The Butchers urge that_ four _feet is sufficiently high for the
-washing of the walls._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The necessity for this alteration will be dealt with under remarks upon
-Bye-law No. 6.
-
-
-BYE-LAW V.
-
-That each Slaughter-house be separated from any adjoining
-Slaughter-house in a different occupation by a brick wall, of at least
-nine inches in thickness, extending from the ground to the roof, so as
-effectually to shut off all atmospheric communication between it and
-the adjacent Slaughter-house.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.
-
-_The Butchers object to the brick side walls between adjoining
-Slaughter-houses being more than six or seven feet high, above which
-they would have placed “the largest possible openings, fitted with
-louvre boards.” They are of opinion “that the best construction in the
-case of a row of Slaughter-houses would be, that there should exist
-means of thorough ventilation from end to end and side to side.”_
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-This involves the most important change in the reconstruction of the
-Slaughter-houses, and in order to explain my views fully upon the
-matter, and avoid paraphrasing the same ideas, I must reiterate,
-almost “_ipsissima verba_” the observations contained in my Report
-upon the subject presented to you in June last, with such omissions or
-alterations more recent information has enabled me to obtain.
-
-I may, however, premise by stating that the present divisional
-walls between the several Slaughter-houses are composed of wet,
-partially rotten, and rugged, brickwork below, and rough, imperfect,
-and defective, wooden partitions above, the whole of which are
-supersaturated with organic animal matters, grease, and dirt.
-
-The faulty construction of these Slaughter-houses was clearly brought
-before the notice of the Select Committee of the House of Commons
-in the evidence given by Sir J. Ogilvy and others, as recently as
-1873, but the only action taken by Parliament to remedy the same in
-the Slaughter-house Act of 1874 (which was based mainly upon the
-recommendations of the said Committee) is comprised in Section 4,
-which directs that “The Local Authority may from time to time _make_,
-_alter_, and _repeal_ Bye-laws for regulating the conduct of any
-business specified in this Act, which is for the time being lawfully
-carried on within their jurisdiction, and the _structure of the
-premises on which such business is being carried on_,” &c. And in order
-to protect the trade from arbitrary action on the part of any local
-authority, it is further enacted that “any Bye-law made in pursuance
-of this section, and any alteration made therein, and any repeal of a
-Bye-law, shall not be of any validity until it has been confirmed by
-the Local Government Board.”
-
-It is quite clear, therefore, that you are acting strictly within your
-legal rights in calling upon the Butchers to put their houses in order.
-
-Your visit to Aldgate must have convinced you that the premises of
-these Slaughter-houses generally are too small for the enormous amount
-of business done in them, and as, owing to the natural increment
-of the population, this evil must ever be augmenting, it becomes a
-serious question to determine whether a strong remonstrance should
-not be addressed by the Commissioners of Sewers to Her Majesty’s
-Government, or failing this to Parliament, against the continuance of
-the smaller of these places, or by insisting that slaughtering should
-only be carried on in houses of such dimensions as would ensure perfect
-ventilation, and provide the means of carrying on the process with
-efficiency. In order to perfect your powers, and establish a wholesome
-check upon the slaughterers, a short Act might be obtained, giving the
-Commissioners of Sewers authority to issue fresh licences, without
-which no Slaughter-houses should be allowed to exist. The present
-licences were issued in 1848, and have not been revised since that
-time, whereas outside the City they are (as they ought to be) renewed
-yearly.
-
-_In the exercise of this important jurisdiction, the Metropolitan
-Board of Works have actually abolished 284 Slaughter-houses during
-the year 1875, having licensed 1,068 Slaughter-houses during the same
-period._
-
-Respecting the technical means to be adopted to remedy the admitted
-defects of these Slaughter-houses, your Engineer will advise you; but,
-without trenching upon the ground of that officer, it must, I think, be
-patent that nothing short of an entire reconstruction of the side walls
-and roofs of all of them will satisfy the requirements of scientific
-sanitation, or ensure that complete _isolation_ of each house, which
-is _the one essential requisite for carrying on the business of
-slaughtering with due regard to the public health_. It is therefore a
-_sine qua non_ that there should be a solid brick partition or side
-wall between each Slaughter-house, and that the only opening allowed
-therein should be for a door (where required), on the ground level,
-and that this wall should extend from the floor to the highest point
-of the roof. An exception to this may be made in those places in which
-an open air passage of 4 or 5 ft. wide exists between the side walls
-of two Slaughter-houses, for here it might be admissible to supplement
-other means of ventilation and light by glazed sashes, which, however,
-must be so made as to be readily closed, should, by any accidental
-circumstance or oversight, a beast affected with any contagious disease
-be found in the adjoining house.
-
-Second only in importance to the closure of these side openings,
-is the provision that the internal facing of all the walls in the
-Slaughter-house should be of a non-absorbing nature, and I am still
-of the opinion, which I ventured to urge unsuccessfully when the
-Bye-laws were framed in November, 1874, viz., that the height mentioned
-in Bye-law VI. is insufficient for the purpose, and that the _whole
-wall-surface_ should be coated with a “hard, smooth, and impervious
-material,” such as is now used in the wards of our best Metropolitan
-hospitals. When this is done, the disgusting and blood-stained
-appearance, seen on the walls of these Slaughter-houses on your recent
-visit, will be impossible, and one fertile source of disease averted.
-
-I entertain a strong objection to the partitions in any part of the
-Slaughter-house, Pound, or Lair, being constructed of wood, for the
-reason that this material becomes rapidly sodden by the constant
-presence of hot moist air, in which state it must inevitably absorb
-noxious and other vapours, and soon become saturated with albuminoid
-organic matter, and afford a ready nidus for the development and
-propagation of any disease germs which may be floating in the air.
-
-The Butchers deny the existence of unpleasant odours in
-Slaughter-houses; but whilst freely admitting this to be a matter in
-which the senses of ordinary men may be differently affected to those
-of persons constantly living in and enjoying an atmosphere, however
-nauseous, I must insist that the air within a Slaughter-house can never
-be wholesome so long as the disgusting practice of opening the paunches
-of hot, reeking animals, directly after they are knocked down, is
-allowed to continue.
-
-From the nature of the food eaten by ruminants, and during its
-disintegration and assimilation, enormous quantities of stinking
-volatile gases are formed, and the sudden disengaging of these when the
-intestines are ripped up and emptied, before being handed over to the
-tripe-dresser, must always fill the surrounding air with what common
-mortals would consider vile and poisonous smells.
-
-You may remember I urged you to make a Bye-law prohibiting this custom,
-and I regret the more it was overruled in Committee, since the only
-excuse offered for its continuance was the very inadequate plea that
-the guts of a large animal were too heavy and bulky to be removed
-without being first deprived of their contents.
-
-Mr. Simon, C.B., F.R.S., &c., &c., my talented predecessor, insisted in
-the Blue Book before referred to, that “an atmosphere which smells of
-organic decomposition, is an unwholesome atmosphere; that it at least
-favours the spread, perhaps also what may virtually be considered the
-production, of morbid infections.”
-
-It has been urged that the closure of the present louvres and other
-apertures in the side walls will restrict the necessary ventilation;
-I am, however, of a contrary opinion, believing that it can be
-demonstrated by the employment of an anemometer; _that in proportion
-to the exclusion of disturbing currents of air from lateral sources,
-will be an increase in the velocity by which the fresh incoming supply
-will travel through the narrow passage from front to back of the
-premises, and that a readier displacement of vitiated air will result_.
-If this should prove insufficient, a constant upward direction of
-ventilation can be accomplished by well-known mechanical contrivances
-in the roof of each house.
-
-Without reiterating the reasons which have led me to insist upon this
-isolation of each Slaughter-house, I will only advert to the very
-evident facility given for one Slaughter-house to infect its neighbour
-should these side openings be allowed to continue, an objection which
-would apply with fatal force should cattle suffering from contagious
-disease be imported by carelessness or design into any one of them.
-
-It being a well-ascertained fact that myriads of germs or
-disease-spreading organisms may be given off in the cutaneous
-exhalations, the excreta, and, possibly, the very breath of infected
-animals, it is no exaggeration to affirm that one such beast might
-decimate its neighbourhood, affecting alike the living cattle in the
-Pounds and Lairs waiting for slaughter, and the dead meat hanging up to
-cool in the Slaughter-house before it was carried away by the retail
-butchers. In the latter case, the well-known power of warm fat in
-rapidly absorbing all kinds of odours, good and bad, would render every
-precaution to prevent the contamination of the meat already killed
-inoperative.
-
-It is no argument against these measures to urge that their necessity
-has not yet been recognised by the unlearned, or to assert that no
-practical difficulty has arisen in the direction just mentioned,
-for it must be remembered that the great aim of all modern Sanitary
-legislation is to discover disease in its germinal condition, and apply
-such _preventive_ agents as will combat the extension of the mischief
-when once discovered.
-
-Interested persons have asserted that no injury to health has been
-proved to result from the existence of Slaughter-houses, even in
-densely populated and confined situations, but my own experience, and
-that of every practical physician, leads to an opposite opinion; in
-support of which I may recall the circumstance of my having recently
-reported to you an outbreak of scarlet fever in the vicinity of
-the Slaughter-houses in Aldgate, and again as lately as 14th March
-last a case of typhoid fever in Somerset Street, at the back of the
-Slaughter-houses, in a house in immediate connexion with the drains of
-the Slaughter-houses and the “blood house” adjoining. Moreover, it is
-a truism, established by recent researches in vital statistics, that
-slaughterers and butchers should be regarded as an unhealthy class
-of men, since they present a much higher rate of mortality than is
-observed in other trades.
-
-It is now established as an actuarial fact,[3] that this
-unhealthfulness of calling applies to all trades in connection with
-animal food, and this has been supposed to depend, in the case of
-butchers and slaughterers,--_Firstly_, from their constantly inhaling
-an atmosphere impregnated with animal matter;--_Secondly_, from their
-exposure to sudden alternations of temperature and the vicissitudes of
-weather; and,--_Thirdly_, from the large amount of animal food they are
-known to eat. It has also been stated with much force that they are
-necessarily exposed, more than other persons, to fevers and zymotic
-diseases, from their constantly breathing an atmosphere charged with
-decomposing, and often putrescent, animal matter.
-
-Respecting the separation of the Pounds from the Slaughter-houses,
-I still retain a strong conviction that such is both necessary and
-expedient, although I am not insensible of the difficulty of carrying
-it out in some few of the Slaughter-houses, whose cramped dimensions
-render this and other requisite accommodation well nigh impracticable.
-In these cases the owners should be compensated, and the places closed.
-
-Before a clear idea can be entertained of the possible and impossible
-improvements in these Slaughter-houses, I strongly recommend that a
-ground plan[4] be prepared of the whole block in High Street, showing
-to scale the exact size of each Shop, Lair, Slaughter-house, and
-out-building, with so much of the surrounding property as will provide
-a back way into the Slaughter-houses upon a give-and-take line as
-between immediate neighbours; should the owners find it their interest
-to combine for such purpose.
-
-By means of this plan it may be seen how far it may be practicable
-to reconstruct the whole of these places upon one agreed basis, and
-prevent, _inter alia_, the objectionable practice of driving the
-cattle across the public footways into the Slaughter-houses, so much
-complained of.
-
-
-BYE-LAW VI.
-
-That the inner surface of the walls of every Slaughter-house be covered
-with slate, stone, or other hard, smooth, impervious material, to the
-height of 7 feet 6 inches, and that above this height to the roof the
-walls be cemented.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_The Butchers say, “It is a useless expense to extend the smooth,
-impervious material beyond four feet,” and that “there is no practical
-advantage in cementing the whole of the upper part of the walls of
-the Slaughter-house; on the contrary, the hard bricks are superior to
-cement, which will break off.”_
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The height of the “dado” was increased from 4 feet 6 inches to 7 feet 6
-inches, in consequence of my having inspected a Slaughter-house outside
-the City, and finding 4 feet 6 inches insufficient to protect the walls
-above from the splashing of blood and filth, the “dado” itself being
-clean.
-
-In Edinburgh the walls are formed of solid ashler stone to a height of
-_seven feet_.
-
-The advantage of covering the inner surfaces of the Slaughter-house
-walls with an impervious cement are twofold: _Firstly_, the walls can
-be much more easily washed and kept clean. _Secondly_, it obviates the
-liability of the walls becoming saturated with decaying nitrogenous
-matter by the constant absorption of moist animal vapours by porous
-bricks. [This precaution was suggested by a perusal of an account of
-the practical experiments of Professor Pettenkofer, of Munich, who has
-clearly demonstrated in various ways the extreme porosity of ordinary
-brick walls.] _Lastly_, a hard, smooth wall prevents the ingress and
-lodgment of vermin. The question of expense raised by the Butchers is
-hardly worthy of prosperous and wealthy tradesmen, and the objection
-that the cement would “break off” is too frivolous to answer.
-
-
-BYE-LAW VII.
-
-That each Slaughter-house be provided with adequate lairage or
-poundage, separated from the slaughtering space by a closed partition,
-extending from the floor to the roof, formed of brick, stone, slate,
-or other similar material, having a smooth impervious surface, to a
-height of at least 7 feet 6 inches from the floor. That in all cases
-where from the present plan of the premises a door is needed between
-the Lair or Pound and the slaughtering space, such door be provided
-with spring hinges, and be kept closed when not open for the passage
-of cattle, but that where other means exist of taking cattle from the
-Lair or Pound into the Slaughter-house, without passing through shops,
-or over important public ways, no door shall exist between the Lair or
-Pound and the Slaughter-house.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.
-
-_The contention here is that the separation of the Slaughter-houses
-from the Pound will impede ventilation, and that a partition six feet
-high is sufficient for the purpose, the Butchers denying that any
-“offensive effluvia arise from a live animal.” It is assumed that the
-reason for this Bye-law is based primarily upon the idea that the
-animals are distressed by seeing the process of slaughtering whilst
-waiting their turn for the pole-axe. It is further objected that the
-spring hinges are likely to lead to accidents to men and beasts._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The chief considerations in support of this Bye-law are given in the
-extract of my Report on 1st June, 1875, above quoted. I may, however,
-say, in addition, that the possibility of the animals waiting for
-slaughter seeing the process of killing other animals, formed no part
-of the argument.
-
-Again, the Butchers’ objection on the score of ventilation is based
-upon the supposition that the Pound must necessarily be of the
-same height as the Slaughter-house, which does not follow, as the
-accompanying Diagram will show:--
-
-[Illustration]
-
-The spring hinges ordered in this Bye-law will ensure the door between
-the Slaughter-house and Pound being kept closed, but the Butchers may,
-if they prefer it, hang the doors by balance weights, so as to slide
-up and down like an ordinary sash window, by which means the direful
-consequences predicted as likely to result from the use of spring
-hinges may be avoided.
-
-
-BYE-LAW VIII.
-
-That where any Slaughter-house or Pound cannot be sufficiently
-ventilated by openings on to the public ways, or on to other open
-places, it shall be ventilated from the roof, which shall be so
-constructed as to admit freely of the escape of air, and that rings for
-burning gas be fixed in the roof so as to increase the upward current
-when a-light, and that both Slaughter-house and Pound be properly
-lighted either from the public ways or other open spaces, and where
-that be not practicable, then from the roof.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.
-
-_The chief arguments relate to matters quite irrelevant, and are very
-confused and unintelligible. The only part of the “objection” belonging
-to this Bye-law is that which refers to the proposal for increasing
-the efficiency of the ventilation by rings of gas, which the Butchers
-characterise as “absurd.”_
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The question raised here is as to the proper mode of ventilation and
-lighting, and seeing that it would be worse than folly to perpetuate
-the evil of allowing an intercommunication between the side walls of
-some of the present ill-devised, and worse-kept, Slaughter-houses in
-Aldgate High Street, your Committee were driven to the alternative of
-requiring both light and ventilation to be sought for in the roof.
-
-The ring of gas spoken of so contemptuously by the Butchers will have
-the effect of rarefying the vitiated air in the Slaughter-houses during
-the process of slaughtering, and by producing an up-current, quicken
-the ventilation.
-
-Upon this point Mr. Darbyshire, before quoted, says, speaking of
-his work at Manchester, “the Slaughter-houses are well lighted from
-the roofs, top lights being superior to side lights for purposes of
-slaughtering.” All the Markets recently constructed by the Corporation
-of London are similarly lighted and ventilated, and at the Abattoir
-in Edinburgh the whole of the ventilation is carried on by large
-ventilators, and other contrivances, in the roof.
-
-
-BYE-LAW IX.
-
-That each Slaughter-house and Pound be thoroughly washed over the
-entire surface of the walls to the height of 7 feet 6 inches, and
-over the whole surface of the floor directly after slaughtering is
-completed, or at least once in every twenty-four hours.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.
-
-_The substance of the objections raised is that the requirements
-for washing are too stringent, with a reiteration of the grievance
-of a dado 7 feet 6 inches; also the Butchers find it “difficult to
-imagine why the walls and floor of the Pound, as well as those of the
-Slaughter-houses, are to be washed after slaughtering,” and seem to
-imagine that the washing is required every twenty-four hours, including
-Sundays, whether slaughtering is going on or not._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The provision for thoroughly cleansing, once in each twenty-four
-hours, Slaughter-houses and Pounds that are in constant use, is too
-obviously necessary to require any defence, and the quibble raised by
-the Butchers about Sunday cleaning is, I presume, intended as a joke.
-
-
-BYE-LAW X.
-
-That the internal surface of the roofs and upper portions of the
-wall of the Slaughter-houses and Pounds above the 7 feet 6 inches of
-impermeable surface be washed with quicklime at least once every month.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.
-
-_That the requirements for the limewhiting are excessive, and that, if
-insisted upon, would be “oppressive and useless.”_
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-I am of opinion that this Bye-law may be relaxed, and that it will
-suffice if the _monthly_ limewhiting be required in the _summer_ only,
-say from May to October; and once in _three_ months in the colder
-seasons, say November to April. The necessity for this periodical
-cleansing with lime would be made abundantly clear if the Local
-Government Board would send one of their own Medical Inspectors to
-see the places as now existing; who would be astonished, as your
-Committee were, to observe the foul, black, sooty, and greasy state of
-all that is left of the ruins of the timbers originally forming the
-roofs of some of the Slaughter-houses in Aldgate, and perhaps concur
-in remarks freely expressed by outsiders, that no regulations can be
-too stringent for the management of a business, which under the most
-careful supervision and with every intelligent precaution, is repulsive
-and offensive to the senses.
-
-Assuming that the observance of the proposed Bye-laws will unavoidably
-compel a partial reconstruction of the Slaughter-houses in Aldgate,
-and substantial repairs in the adjacent structures, the washing
-with quicklime was ordered with a view of providing a suitable and
-inexpensive coating for the new wood-work of the roofs, &c., for, owing
-to the constant presence of Sulphuretted Hydrogen in Slaughter-houses,
-paint is inadmissible from the circumstance that it would speedily
-be turned black by the action of such gas upon any mineral pigment
-employed. The limewhiting if used _hot_ would act as a powerful
-disinfectant and deodoriser, as well as having the effect of greatly
-reflecting the light in the Slaughter-house, and giving the place a
-cool and clean appearance.
-
-The Metropolitan Board of Works in their 6th Bye-law require that “the
-occupier shall keep the inner walls of every Slaughter-house always
-_thoroughly clean_ and in _good order and repair_, and shall cause the
-internal surface of the _roof_ and _upper portions of the walls_ to
-be thoroughly washed with quicklime _at least_ once in _every three
-months_.”
-
-The Butchers have probably overlooked this Bye-law in quoting the
-action of the Metropolitan Board of Works.
-
-
-BYE-LAW XV.
-
-That no Slaughter-house or Pound be used for any purpose other than
-that for which it is licensed, and that no slaughtering be conducted
-within public view.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_The Butchers maintain that the Pound is not included in the Licence
-for the Slaughter-house._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-It is quite true that the word _Pound_ is not used in the Licence for a
-Slaughter-house, but the Act of Parliament, 1874, distinctly provides
-that the Bye-laws shall extend to the “_premises_” generally.
-
-
-BYE-LAW XVIII.
-
-That in case of any diseased or unsound cattle being brought to a
-Slaughter-house, Pound, or Lair, the occupier shall forthwith give
-information thereof to the Medical Officer of Health of the City of
-London.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_That the retention of the word unsound might involve the Butchers in a
-charge of Slaughtering Diseased Meat._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-I should not insist upon the retention of the word “_unsound_” if some
-guarantee could be exacted that the animal would be slaughtered within
-a specified time of the occurrence of any accident which might disable
-it; although it must be remembered that the flesh of a beast suffering
-pain, or deprived of the full use of all its functions, rapidly
-deteriorates in quality and nutrient properties.
-
-
-BYE-LAW XXI.
-
-That every person occupying a Slaughter-house shall cause the works
-needful for complying with these Bye-laws to be forthwith executed,
-and when completed shall not permit any alteration to be made in them
-without the sanction of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of
-London, and that the whole of the works and regulations be carried out
-to the approval of the Medical Officer of Health.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_That the Medical Officer of Health should not be the judge of the mode
-in which the works ordered by the Bye-laws are executed._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-This Bye-law provides a salutary check upon the active resistance the
-Butchers seem ever ready to offer to rules intended for their own
-benefit, no less than the protection of the public health, and the
-general arrangements and discipline of a Slaughter-house belonging
-exclusively to the Sanitary Department, your Committee thought it would
-save circumlocution if the Medical Officer of Health was made amenable
-to the Court of Sewers for the due maintenance of the Bye-laws in their
-integrity.
-
-So far, however, as I am concerned I shall be very thankful to be
-relieved from the odious duty of enforcing regulations which are so
-ungraciously acquiesced in by the persons on whose behoof they are
-made, at the same time I shall never shrink from accepting whatever
-responsibility may be connected with my office.
-
-It is quite untrue, as stated by the Butchers’ Trade Society, “that
-the Bye-laws in question have been framed by persons totally without
-practical acquaintance with the trade,” the fact being, that they were
-prepared with the active assistance of several Members of the Committee
-of great experience as providitors, two of whom are large carcass
-butchers, and two others are extensively connected, commercially and
-officially, with the butchering interests, and well informed upon the
-economy of Markets and Slaughter-houses. Again, the Committee was
-attended at each of its sittings by the Deputy of the Ward in which
-the Slaughter-houses are situated, who was specially invited to attend
-upon each occasion, and who generously and frankly avowed himself the
-advocate of the slaughterers. This gentleman took part in all the
-discussions, and argued forcibly and fully every point in connexion
-with the subject; but beyond this, your Committee’s Report was further
-analysed and criticised by the General Court of Sewers, amongst whom
-were many Commissioners practically and intimately acquainted with
-the whole bearings and requirement of the question. As you are aware,
-the Court adopted your Report, without amendment or alteration, being
-satisfied of the wisdom and expediency of the Bye-laws compiled by you.
-
-The remarks of the “Butchers’ Trade Society” relative to the Report
-being passed by the Court of Sewers with “closed doors” require one
-word of explanation: The exclusion of strangers at the time the Report
-was presented was not dictated by any desire to conceal the purport of
-its contents, and indeed had nothing to do with the main question of
-its adoption, but was resolved simply in order that the Solicitor might
-read a confidential communication having reference only to a technical
-legal proposition as to the mode of enforcing the said Bye-laws should
-they be sanctioned by the Local Government Board.
-
-In conclusion, I will only add that, having given my best attention to
-the whole subject, and carefully considered the not very formidable
-“objections” raised by the butchers, I have arrived at the honest
-conviction that no substantial grounds are therein advanced which
-would justify you, as the Sanitary Authority in the City of London, in
-varying the requirements of the Bye-laws submitted for approval to the
-Local Government Board, beyond the concessions herein described.
-
-Adverting to my individual action in the matter, I may here repeat that
-I am quite unconscious of the smallest desire to limit the usefulness
-or cripple the operations of an important and valuable trade, and that
-I have endeavoured to reconcile the desires of the occupiers of the
-Slaughter-houses with the imperative requirements of the public health;
-nevertheless, I cannot help sharing the conviction of all competent
-Sanitarians, that the perpetuation of densely packed Slaughter-houses
-in the midst of a close population, where the introduction of a
-sufficient supply of light, air, and ventilation, is physically
-impossible, was a lamentable error of legislation, which every
-unprejudiced observer admits will, and _must_, be remedied, whenever
-the exigencies of public health are allowed to outweigh the antagonism
-of interested and uncompromising opposition.
-
-I feel it necessary to say as much as this, since I have been credited
-with more than my share in the preparation of the materials upon
-which you have deemed it wise and expedient to frame these Bye-laws,
-an impression which has involved me in no small amount of abuse and
-obloquy.
-
- I have the honour to be,
- GENTLEMEN,
- Your obedient Servant,
-
- WM. SEDGWICK SAUNDERS, M.D.,
- _Medical Officer of Health_.
-
- GUILDHALL,
- _27th June, 1876_.
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[2] The “objections” are quoted in abstract only, in order to save
-space, but the sense of the same has been scrupulously observed.
-
-[3] In a paper on the “Influence of Occupation upon Health,” read by
-Mr. F. G. P. Neilson, F.S.S., before the Institute of Actuaries, and
-published in their Journal, July, 1872, it is shewn that in the forty
-years of age, 25 to 65, the mortality of butchers is 17·9 per thousand
-living, and that of poulterers 21·0, as against 10·6 of gardeners,
-12·4 carpenters, 13·4 shoemakers, 16·8 stonemasons, &c. The results
-were obtained by a comparison of the whole of the mortality of England
-and Wales, 1860-1, with 1,147,243 years of life of members of Friendly
-Societies.
-
-[4] This has since been done, and a copy sent to the Local Government
-Board.
-
-
-
-
-POSTSCRIPT.
-
-
-Since the foregoing was written I have received copies of additional
-documents forwarded by the “Butchers’ Trade Society” to the Local
-Government Board, and, in accordance with your request, have perused
-and considered the same.
-
-These communications begin with a long letter from the above named
-Society, consisting of extracts from my Report on Slaughter-houses,
-dated 1st June, 1875, with observations upon the same, given point by
-point in parallel columns.
-
-These remarks are really little more than a “_réchauffé_” of those
-already set forth in the voluminous epistle of the Society, dated 10th
-April, 1876, addressed to the Local Government Board, and I fail to
-recognise any more important differences than the following, viz., some
-very ungracious and totally irrelevant reflections upon the conduct
-of the District Sanitary Inspectors, for the forbearance shown by
-those officers in allowing the greatest latitude as to the defects and
-nuisances observed in the butchers’ premises to continue with as little
-interference as possible until the new _régime_ could be established;
-also a statement that your Engineer is at variance with myself in the
-recommendations given to your Committee, the truth being that they were
-prepared by that officer in conjunction with your Solicitor and myself.
-Further, the Society inform the Local Government Board, that disease
-germs have never been known to rise to a height of six feet, and that
-therefore the side walls separating adjoining Slaughter-houses need not
-be built as high as the Bye-laws require! This is a fair sample of the
-recklessness with which the “Butchers’ Trade Society’s” last production
-has been framed, and pays a poor compliment to the discrimination
-of the Local Government Board, who may, if they think fit, educate
-the Society to the fact that disease germs have been known to travel
-many thousands of miles, carrying with them cholera and kindred
-diseases from the far East to the distant West;--a corresponding
-degree of ignorance characterises the dicta of the butchers upon
-the physical laws which govern the movements of currents of air,
-and which for convenience is called ventilation. Again, the Society
-claim an exceptional state of salubrity and freedom from disease for
-butchers as a class--a proposition which I have already shown you is
-untenable. Further information may be obtained upon this subject from
-a Report written by Dr. Buchanan, one of the Medical Inspectors of
-the Local Government Board, upon the connection between scarlet fever
-and cow sheds, in a district under his charge. Lastly, the Society
-ask, whether in my judgment the butchers would be less unhealthy in
-the Slaughter-houses as arranged according to my plan, and I answer
-broadly and unhesitatingly, Yes.
-
-The remaining letters comprise one from the Reverend the Vicar of
-St. Botolph, whose testimony as to the general condition of the
-Slaughter-houses is opposed to the evidence of your own senses when
-visiting the places, and is otherwise grossly inaccurate; also
-letters from two resident medical practitioners certifying as to
-the healthiness of the neighbourhood of Aldgate in general, and
-the Slaughter-houses in particular--also a detailed Report from a
-Metropolitan Medical Officer of Health, who has so implicitly adopted
-every “objection” made by the butchers to your Bye-laws, that I am
-irresistibly forced to the conclusion that he is either the author of
-such “objections,” or has lent a too credent ear to the gentleman he
-mentions as having accompanied him in his survey, and “who gave him
-much valuable information, statistical and otherwise.” Upon fairly
-balancing the whole matter, I cannot see any reason to modify the
-opinions expressed in my Report of 27th June last, and in apportioning
-the value to be awarded to the conflicting testimony offered to you,
-I must ask you to remember that the strenuous efforts in the way of
-resistance made by the butchers, and my own justification of the
-principles of right and propriety, which have alone dictated my advice,
-rest upon totally distinct bases.
-
- W. S. S.
-
- GUILDHALL,
- _14th July, 1876_.
-
-
-CHARLES SKIPPER AND EAST, PRINTERS, ST. DUNSTAN’S HILL, E.C.
-
-
-PLAN OF SLAUGHTER-HOUSES IN THE CITY OF LONDON.
-
-
-NOTE
-
- _The_ Light Red Tint, _shews buildings principally constructed of
- Brick_.
-
- _The_ Red Tint, _shews Buildings constructed of Brick, and Inhabited_.
-
- _The_ Yellow Tint, _shews buildings principally constructed of Wood_.
-
- _William Haywood_
- _July 1876_
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber’s Notes
-
-In a few cases, minor errors in punctuation have been fixed.
-
-*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK REPORT OF THE SANITARY
-COMMITTEE OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF SEWERS OF THE CITY OF LONDON, TOGETHER
-WITH A REPORT OF THE MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH ON THE OBJECTIONS RAISED
-BY THE BUTCHERS' TRADE SOCIETY TO THE BYE-LAWS PROPOSED FOR THE
-REGULATION OF SLAUGHTER-HOUSES ***
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the
-United States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
- you are located before using this eBook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that:
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without
-widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.