summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authornfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org>2025-01-22 02:54:07 -0800
committernfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org>2025-01-22 02:54:07 -0800
commitb515c2bf5a890f7975190e4daa7d9e078480b9f2 (patch)
tree0ed3cbc08fb205760b3cdb4356bd14b2689c45aa
parent5feb823227306cfe862ca2347b94d4fc17c01631 (diff)
NormalizeHEADmain
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes4
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
-rw-r--r--old/67634-0.txt1536
-rw-r--r--old/67634-0.zipbin26863 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/67634-h.zipbin269171 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/67634-h/67634-h.htm1823
-rw-r--r--old/67634-h/images/001.jpgbin49239 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/67634-h/images/002.jpgbin100577 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/67634-h/images/cover.jpgbin100693 -> 0 bytes
10 files changed, 17 insertions, 3359 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d7b82bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+*.txt text eol=lf
+*.htm text eol=lf
+*.html text eol=lf
+*.md text eol=lf
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..79526a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #67634 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/67634)
diff --git a/old/67634-0.txt b/old/67634-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index dc4dced..0000000
--- a/old/67634-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,1536 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg eBook of Report of the sanitary committee of
-the commissioners of sewers of the city of London, together with a
-report of the medical officer of health on the objections raised by the
-Butchers' Trade Society to the bye-laws proposed for the regulation of
-slaughter-houses, by Wm. Sedgwick Saunders
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
-will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before
-using this eBook.
-
-Title: Report of the sanitary committee of the commissioners of sewers
- of the city of London, together with a report of the medical
- officer of health on the objections raised by the Butchers' Trade
- Society to the bye-laws proposed for the regulation of
- slaughter-houses
-
-Author: Wm. Sedgwick Saunders
-
-Release Date: March 15, 2022 [eBook #67634]
-
-Language: English
-
-Produced by: deaurider and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
- https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
- generously made available by The Internet Archive)
-
-*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK REPORT OF THE SANITARY
-COMMITTEE OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF SEWERS OF THE CITY OF LONDON, TOGETHER
-WITH A REPORT OF THE MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH ON THE OBJECTIONS RAISED
-BY THE BUTCHERS' TRADE SOCIETY TO THE BYE-LAWS PROPOSED FOR THE
-REGULATION OF SLAUGHTER-HOUSES ***
-
-
-
-
-
- REPORT
-
- OF THE
-
- SANITARY COMMITTEE
-
- OF THE
-
- COMMISSIONERS OF SEWERS OF THE CITY OF LONDON,
-
- TOGETHER WITH A
-
- REPORT
-
- OF THE
-
- MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH
-
- ON
-
- THE OBJECTIONS RAISED BY THE BUTCHERS’
- TRADE SOCIETY TO THE BYE-LAWS PROPOSED FOR
- THE REGULATION OF
-
- SLAUGHTER-HOUSES.
-
- LONDON:
- CHARLES SKIPPER & EAST, PRINTERS, ST. DUNSTAN’S HILL, E.C.
-
- 1876.
-
-
-
-
- _At a Meeting of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of London,
- held at the Guildhall, on Tuesday, the 4th day of July, 1876,_
-
- FREDERICK COX, ESQ., IN THE CHAIR.
-
-
-A Report from the Sanitary Committee (WILLIAM CAVE FOWLER, Esq.,
-Deputy, Deputy-Chairman), dated this day, was read--
-
-On the Reference of the 23rd of May last, to consider the Letter
-from the Local Government Board relative to the Slaughter-house
-Bye-laws agreed to on the 14th of March last, and submitted to the
-Local Government Board for confirmation, and on the objections of the
-Butchers’ Trade Society to the said Bye-laws.
-
-Submitting a Report from the Medical Officer of Health in reply to
-the said objections, and recommending the Commissioners’ concurrence
-therein.
-
-
-RESOLVED--
-
-That this Court doth agree with the Committee in their said Report, and
-doth confirm and adopt the same.
-
-
-ORDERED--
-
-That a Copy of the Medical Officer’s Report be sent to the Local
-Government Board in reply to their Communications therein referred to.
-
-
-ORDERED--
-
-That the Report be printed, and circulated as usual.
-
- HENRY BLAKE,
- _Principal Clerk_.
-
-
-
-
- REPORT
- OF THE
- SANITARY COMMITTEE.
-
-
-We have, in accordance with your Reference to us of the 23rd May
-last, considered the letter from the Local Government Board, dated
-the 13th of May, relative to the new Bye-laws for the management
-of Slaughter-houses within the City of London, agreed to by your
-Honourable Court on the 14th of March last, and submitted to the Local
-Government Board for confirmation. Also we have carefully considered
-the letter of Messrs. Crouch and Spencer, with objections on behalf of
-the Butchers’ Trade Society, to the said Bye-laws, enclosed in the said
-letter from the Local Government Board for your observations.
-
-We requested the Medical Officer of Health to give a detailed Report
-in regard to the objections raised by the Butchers’ Trade Society to
-the said Bye-laws, and we beg now to submit the same to your Honourable
-Court.
-
-We have carefully considered the said Report, with the Bye-laws, and
-the said communications from the Local Government Board.
-
-We have also received and considered a further communication from the
-Local Government Board, with copy of a letter from Messrs. Crouch and
-Spencer, enclosing further objections on behalf of the Butchers’ Trade
-Society to the said Bye-laws, also a Report from a Dr. Whitmore, and
-letters from certain residents of Aldgate in support of such objections.
-
-We beg to recommend that your Honourable Court concur in the Report of
-the Medical Officer of Health, and that a copy thereof be forwarded to
-the Local Government Board in reply to their communication of the 13th
-ulto.
-
-The effect of this will be, to adhere to the several proposed Bye-laws,
-except that as regards Bye-law No. 10, which is as follows:--
-
- “That the internal surface of the roofs and upper portions of the
- walls of the Slaughter-houses and Pounds, above the 7 ft. 6 in. of
- impermeable surface, be washed with quicklime at least once every
- month.”
-
-It is suggested that it may be so far relaxed, that the monthly
-limewhiting be required in the summer only, say from May to October,
-and that in the winter months, say from November to April, the
-limewhiting be required to be done once in three months.
-
-And as regards Bye-law No. 18, which is as follows:--
-
- “That in case of any diseased or unsound cattle being brought to a
- Slaughter-house, Pound, or Lair, the occupier shall forthwith give
- information thereof to the Medical Officer of Health of the City of
- London.”
-
-It is proposed not to insist upon the retention of the word “unsound,”
-provided that the animals be slaughtered within a specified time of the
-occurrence of any accident that may disable them.
-
-All which we submit to the judgment of your Honourable Court.
-
-Dated this 4th day of July, 1876.
-
- (Signed) FREDᴷ. COX.
- W. C. FOWLER.
- H. H. HEATH.
- W. I. LOWE.
-
-
-
-
- REPORT
- OF THE
- MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH.
-
-
- _To the Sanitary Committee of the Honourable
- the Commissioners of Sewers._
-
- GENTLEMEN,
-
-In compliance with your request that I should “give a detailed Report
-in regard to the objections raised by the ‘Butchers’ Trade Society’
-to the proposed ‘Bye-laws’” for the better conduct and regulation of
-Slaughter-houses within the City of London, agreed to by the Honourable
-the Court of Sewers, and submitted by them to the Local Government
-Board for confirmation, and which “objections” were contained in a
-letter forwarded to the said Board by the said Society, a copy of which
-was sent to your Committee by the said Board for your consideration and
-observations thereon, I beg to offer the following remarks:
-
-There are 27 Slaughter-houses in the City of London, viz.: 24 in
-Aldgate,[1] 1 in Bishopsgate, 1 in Farringdon, and 1 in Cripplegate
-Ward: of these the following observations apply exclusively to Aldgate,
-no “objections” to the Bye-laws having been expressed by the occupiers
-of the remaining three.
-
-The Bye-laws referred to were framed with a full knowledge of
-the intended, and indeed threatened, opposition on the part of
-the slaughterers and butchers of Aldgate, and every “objection”
-mentioned in their letter to the Local Government Board was fully
-and dispassionately discussed by your Committee during many lengthy
-sittings, at each of which they invited, and were favoured by, the
-presence of the Deputy of the Ward in which the Slaughter-houses are
-situated.
-
-This gentleman ably and forcibly supported the views propounded by the
-butchers, and evinced the keenest anxiety to protect their interests.
-
-Subsequently your recommendations respecting these Bye-laws were
-adopted with surprising unanimity by the Honourable the Court of Sewers
-without amendment or alteration; a number of Commissioners then being
-present who are immediately interested in the butchering business, and
-practically acquainted with its wants, concurring in their acceptance.
-
-The initial difficulty in dealing with this question arises from the
-anomalous conditions as to size, number, and areas, to be found in the
-Slaughter-houses and adjoining premises at Aldgate.
-
-The twenty-four Slaughter-houses in Aldgate are, with one or two
-exceptions, situated side by side; all have a direct communication with
-a shop facing High Street, Whitechapel, and six of them have no other
-means for the entrance of cattle than by their being driven across the
-footways and through the shop; a practice which renders the pavement
-at times impassable, and causes terror and annoyance to the public.
-These shops are for the most part low in ceiling height, and very
-narrow in frontage, =one being but 9 ft. wide,--two 10 ft.,--one 10 ft.
-6 in.,--two 11 ft.=,--and so on. In some of them the Slaughter-house
-widens in the back part of the premises, but in several, viz., at Nos.
-55, 58, 59, 60, 68, and 73, the whole business of a retail butcher and
-slaughterer is conducted in the narrow strips above quoted.
-
-Your Committee having viewed these places, will recollect that at No.
-73, where the extreme width of the Shop and Slaughter-house was but 9
-ft., there was no room to pass up and down the Slaughter-house when the
-carcasses of the slaughtered animals were hanging, excepting by moving
-sideways, and that the atmosphere of the place was pervaded by a hot,
-moist, sickening vapour, for want of thorough ventilation; you must
-also have remarked upon the general state of disrepair of the whole
-of these Slaughter-houses, the dilapidated roofs, the blood-stained
-and filthy state of the side walls, the uneven and broken condition
-of the flooring, the imperfect, totally inadequate, and badly placed
-water supply, the large accumulations of dung, offal, and blood, and
-the defective and sluggish drainage, down the gratings of which you
-could not fail to have seen a plentiful flow of crude liquid manure,
-which the man in charge was industriously sweeping into the sewers,
-to their great pollution; all these indicate a state of neglect which
-could only have arisen from a consciousness on the part of the owners
-and occupiers that the Legislature intended to abolish such places as
-private Slaughter-houses upon the expiration of the Act of 1844, 7th
-and 8th Vict., c. 84. Unfortunately, however, the so-called vested
-interests of the butchers proved too strong with the Government for the
-protection of the public, and Parliament in 1874, by the 37th and 38th
-Vict., c. 67, was induced to perpetuate these Slaughter-houses in the
-City of London, under such regulations it is your province to make and
-maintain.
-
-In order to be consistent, and to enable the Court of Sewers to
-exercise a proper amount of control, each Slaughter-house must be
-treated as a separate and independent building; and, in advising you as
-to the best mode of securing such control, it has ever been a source
-of deep anxiety and considerable embarrassment to me, how best to
-reconcile the wants of modern sanitation, decency, and order, with the
-inevitable sacrifices on the part of the occupiers of the smallest
-of these places, which I foresee and confess to be demanded by the
-institution of thorough disciplinary measures.
-
-The necessity for treating each Slaughter-house as a distinct
-structure “_per se_,” and the apparent consciousness of the inability
-of the holders of the smaller ones to adapt themselves to efficient
-regulations, is, I believe, the main cause of the opposition now made
-to the Bye-laws, for I have reason to know that the occupiers of the
-larger Slaughter-houses are ready to conform to the spirit of the
-Bye-laws, albeit they are not in accord with us as to some of the
-provisions therein.
-
-Under the peculiar and exceptional circumstances of the case before
-us, the question of dimensions so completely underlies the whole
-contention, that I earnestly hope your Committee will call the
-particular attention of the Local Government Board to the _size_ of
-these small Slaughter-houses, as shown on the Plan made to scale by
-your Engineer, and forwarded to the Board some time ago [a copy of
-which, upon a reduced scale, is appended hereto]; for I can scarcely
-imagine that the Board have the least idea of the diminutive space
-in which slaughtering _on a large scale is going on night and day_ in
-defiance of the principles of health or humanity.
-
-The Board should also be informed that the slaughtering effected in
-these places extends far beyond the requirements of the neighbourhood,
-and that the plea of the Butchers that they provide marketable
-commodities suitable to the necessities of the poor of their locality
-is essentially unsound, from an economical point of view, it having
-been found in places where Abattoirs obtain, that the poor readily
-follow any market which offers them pecuniary advantages.
-
-I now proceed to notice the various “objections” advanced in the letter
-of the “Butchers’ Trade Society”:--They relate, for the most part, to
-the _structural_ repairs rendered necessary by the present ruinous
-condition of the Aldgate Slaughter-houses generally, which, in spite of
-admitted neglect, due to their owners having expected their demolition
-in 1874, when the Act of 1834 affecting Slaughter-houses expired, are
-now resisted upon the score of expense.
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[1] These Slaughter-houses are really in Portsoken Ward, but they are
-always quoted as of Aldgate Ward, and will be so described in this
-Report to avoid confusion.
-
-
-
-
-REPLY TO “OBJECTIONS” OF THE “BUTCHERS’ TRADE SOCIETY” TO THE BYE-LAWS.
-
-
-BYE-LAW I.
-
-That each Slaughter-house be paved with asphalte, laid with proper
-slopes and channels towards a trapped gully, and, where practicable,
-such gully shall be outside the Slaughter-house and Pound.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.[2]
-
-_The Butchers demur, firstly, to the use of asphalte, and, secondly, to
-the gully being placed outside the Slaughter-house._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The reason for insisting upon _asphalte_ is to avoid _joints_, which
-are inevitable in every other kind of pavement.
-
-The joints in stone pavements, however well laid, cannot be made
-durable, owing to the frequent concussions produced by the animals
-falling heavily and suddenly when pole-axed, and the joints being once
-cracked or broken readily admit through their interstices every kind of
-liquid filth, which accumulates in the subsoil and decomposes there.
-
-The flooring of the present Slaughter-houses in Aldgate is composed of
-small, and badly laid, flag-stones, &c., which are loose, broken, and
-uneven in many places, and which cannot be properly cleansed on account
-of the inequalities of the surfaces.
-
-The retention of this Bye-law will, of course, prevent the replacement
-of the old flag-stones upon the reconstruction of the Slaughter-houses,
-and involve the owners in some expense.
-
-A smooth jointless pavement for Slaughter-houses was unanimously
-considered the best at a meeting of the Royal Institute of British
-Architects, in a discussion which followed the reading of a paper by
-Mr. Darbyshire, on Public Abattoirs, 1st February, 1875.
-
-The Metropolitan Board of Works is quoted by the “Butchers’ Trade
-Society” as sanctioning the use of flag-stones, but this is scarcely
-ingenuous, the truth being that the Board recommend _asphalte_ in
-the _first instance_, but allow flag-stones set in cement as an
-_alternative_.
-
-The advantage of placing the gully _outside_ the Slaughter-houses, is
-that it prevents the admission of solid matters into the drains, and
-provided the floor be laid at a proper inclination towards the door,
-all fluid materials can be readily conducted thence by gravitation into
-the drain beyond, by means of sunken stone channels, or cast-iron boxes
-having hinges, without the creation of unavoidable nuisance. These
-channels should be provided at certain intervals with what are termed
-“grids,” which prevent anything but liquids passing into the drain or
-sewer.
-
-“The _grids_ are hinged to fall back against the walls, and, on being
-opened, reveal a cast-iron box or chamber, with a flange all round the
-top edge, which rests on a rebate cast on the outer shell; this box
-is movable, and is perforated through the bottom and sides; under
-the movable box is another chamber opening direct into the trap,
-which is cast to the outer shell of the frame work.”--(Darbyshire on
-Abattoirs.)--These grids are in daily use at Manchester and elsewhere,
-and are made by Bunnett and Co.
-
-The scavengers should attend to the movable boxes at regular intervals,
-and cart away all solid matter.
-
-In the Edinburgh Abattoirs there are “two distinct sets of drains, one
-for the surface water, which is conveyed directly into Lochrin burn,
-the other for the soil, which is conveyed into large tanks, prepared
-for its reception, and sold for agricultural purposes.” (_Encyclopædia
-Britannica._)
-
-It is impossible to over-estimate the importance of excluding blood,
-offal or dung, &c., from the sewers at all times, but especially in
-seasons of epidemic zymotic diseases, and it would be an inestimable
-boon, and one by no means difficult of accomplishment, if the Scotch
-system could be imitated at Aldgate.
-
-
-BYE-LAW II.
-
-That each Slaughter-house be drained by a glazed pipe drain, not less
-than six inches in diameter, set in concrete and jointed in cement,
-or otherwise made impermeable, and communicating directly with the
-public sewer. That the gully at the inlet to the drain be trapped
-with a stoneware syphon-trap, or other trap of approved material and
-construction, and be covered with a grating, the bars of which shall
-not be more than three-eighths of an inch apart; the grating to be
-fastened with a lock and key, and kept at all times locked, unless
-opened for cleansing or repair.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_That “it is very doubtful whether setting the drain pipes in
-cement, whereby they cannot be got at, except by great breakage and
-disturbance, is at all advantageous.”_
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The advantages claimed for setting the drain pipes in, and upon cement,
-are durability and strength; and if a pipe of six inches diameter be
-used, there is but little liability of its becoming choked or requiring
-repair for many years. Drain pipes laid on soft subsoil materials
-frequently break asunder from the subsidence of such a matrix, or from
-heavy weights falling suddenly upon them, from above, and our daily
-sanitary work furnishes abundant evidence of the danger to health
-arising from the fracture of drain pipes, where originally placed upon
-improper ground, and especially when under such circumstances they are
-subjected to violent blows.
-
-In Edinburgh the Slaughter-houses are “laid with a thick well-dressed
-pavement, resting on a stratum of concrete twelve inches thick.”
-
-
-BYE-LAW IV.
-
-That each Slaughter-house be provided with adequate cisternage and
-water supply, or, where practicable, with a _constant_ supply of water,
-and such arrangement of pipes as will enable the pavement and the walls
-to the height of 7 feet 6 inches to be conveniently and quickly washed.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_The Butchers urge that_ four _feet is sufficiently high for the
-washing of the walls._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The necessity for this alteration will be dealt with under remarks upon
-Bye-law No. 6.
-
-
-BYE-LAW V.
-
-That each Slaughter-house be separated from any adjoining
-Slaughter-house in a different occupation by a brick wall, of at least
-nine inches in thickness, extending from the ground to the roof, so as
-effectually to shut off all atmospheric communication between it and
-the adjacent Slaughter-house.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.
-
-_The Butchers object to the brick side walls between adjoining
-Slaughter-houses being more than six or seven feet high, above which
-they would have placed “the largest possible openings, fitted with
-louvre boards.” They are of opinion “that the best construction in the
-case of a row of Slaughter-houses would be, that there should exist
-means of thorough ventilation from end to end and side to side.”_
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-This involves the most important change in the reconstruction of the
-Slaughter-houses, and in order to explain my views fully upon the
-matter, and avoid paraphrasing the same ideas, I must reiterate,
-almost “_ipsissima verba_” the observations contained in my Report
-upon the subject presented to you in June last, with such omissions or
-alterations more recent information has enabled me to obtain.
-
-I may, however, premise by stating that the present divisional
-walls between the several Slaughter-houses are composed of wet,
-partially rotten, and rugged, brickwork below, and rough, imperfect,
-and defective, wooden partitions above, the whole of which are
-supersaturated with organic animal matters, grease, and dirt.
-
-The faulty construction of these Slaughter-houses was clearly brought
-before the notice of the Select Committee of the House of Commons
-in the evidence given by Sir J. Ogilvy and others, as recently as
-1873, but the only action taken by Parliament to remedy the same in
-the Slaughter-house Act of 1874 (which was based mainly upon the
-recommendations of the said Committee) is comprised in Section 4,
-which directs that “The Local Authority may from time to time _make_,
-_alter_, and _repeal_ Bye-laws for regulating the conduct of any
-business specified in this Act, which is for the time being lawfully
-carried on within their jurisdiction, and the _structure of the
-premises on which such business is being carried on_,” &c. And in order
-to protect the trade from arbitrary action on the part of any local
-authority, it is further enacted that “any Bye-law made in pursuance
-of this section, and any alteration made therein, and any repeal of a
-Bye-law, shall not be of any validity until it has been confirmed by
-the Local Government Board.”
-
-It is quite clear, therefore, that you are acting strictly within your
-legal rights in calling upon the Butchers to put their houses in order.
-
-Your visit to Aldgate must have convinced you that the premises of
-these Slaughter-houses generally are too small for the enormous amount
-of business done in them, and as, owing to the natural increment
-of the population, this evil must ever be augmenting, it becomes a
-serious question to determine whether a strong remonstrance should
-not be addressed by the Commissioners of Sewers to Her Majesty’s
-Government, or failing this to Parliament, against the continuance of
-the smaller of these places, or by insisting that slaughtering should
-only be carried on in houses of such dimensions as would ensure perfect
-ventilation, and provide the means of carrying on the process with
-efficiency. In order to perfect your powers, and establish a wholesome
-check upon the slaughterers, a short Act might be obtained, giving the
-Commissioners of Sewers authority to issue fresh licences, without
-which no Slaughter-houses should be allowed to exist. The present
-licences were issued in 1848, and have not been revised since that
-time, whereas outside the City they are (as they ought to be) renewed
-yearly.
-
-_In the exercise of this important jurisdiction, the Metropolitan
-Board of Works have actually abolished 284 Slaughter-houses during
-the year 1875, having licensed 1,068 Slaughter-houses during the same
-period._
-
-Respecting the technical means to be adopted to remedy the admitted
-defects of these Slaughter-houses, your Engineer will advise you; but,
-without trenching upon the ground of that officer, it must, I think, be
-patent that nothing short of an entire reconstruction of the side walls
-and roofs of all of them will satisfy the requirements of scientific
-sanitation, or ensure that complete _isolation_ of each house, which
-is _the one essential requisite for carrying on the business of
-slaughtering with due regard to the public health_. It is therefore a
-_sine qua non_ that there should be a solid brick partition or side
-wall between each Slaughter-house, and that the only opening allowed
-therein should be for a door (where required), on the ground level,
-and that this wall should extend from the floor to the highest point
-of the roof. An exception to this may be made in those places in which
-an open air passage of 4 or 5 ft. wide exists between the side walls
-of two Slaughter-houses, for here it might be admissible to supplement
-other means of ventilation and light by glazed sashes, which, however,
-must be so made as to be readily closed, should, by any accidental
-circumstance or oversight, a beast affected with any contagious disease
-be found in the adjoining house.
-
-Second only in importance to the closure of these side openings,
-is the provision that the internal facing of all the walls in the
-Slaughter-house should be of a non-absorbing nature, and I am still
-of the opinion, which I ventured to urge unsuccessfully when the
-Bye-laws were framed in November, 1874, viz., that the height mentioned
-in Bye-law VI. is insufficient for the purpose, and that the _whole
-wall-surface_ should be coated with a “hard, smooth, and impervious
-material,” such as is now used in the wards of our best Metropolitan
-hospitals. When this is done, the disgusting and blood-stained
-appearance, seen on the walls of these Slaughter-houses on your recent
-visit, will be impossible, and one fertile source of disease averted.
-
-I entertain a strong objection to the partitions in any part of the
-Slaughter-house, Pound, or Lair, being constructed of wood, for the
-reason that this material becomes rapidly sodden by the constant
-presence of hot moist air, in which state it must inevitably absorb
-noxious and other vapours, and soon become saturated with albuminoid
-organic matter, and afford a ready nidus for the development and
-propagation of any disease germs which may be floating in the air.
-
-The Butchers deny the existence of unpleasant odours in
-Slaughter-houses; but whilst freely admitting this to be a matter in
-which the senses of ordinary men may be differently affected to those
-of persons constantly living in and enjoying an atmosphere, however
-nauseous, I must insist that the air within a Slaughter-house can never
-be wholesome so long as the disgusting practice of opening the paunches
-of hot, reeking animals, directly after they are knocked down, is
-allowed to continue.
-
-From the nature of the food eaten by ruminants, and during its
-disintegration and assimilation, enormous quantities of stinking
-volatile gases are formed, and the sudden disengaging of these when the
-intestines are ripped up and emptied, before being handed over to the
-tripe-dresser, must always fill the surrounding air with what common
-mortals would consider vile and poisonous smells.
-
-You may remember I urged you to make a Bye-law prohibiting this custom,
-and I regret the more it was overruled in Committee, since the only
-excuse offered for its continuance was the very inadequate plea that
-the guts of a large animal were too heavy and bulky to be removed
-without being first deprived of their contents.
-
-Mr. Simon, C.B., F.R.S., &c., &c., my talented predecessor, insisted in
-the Blue Book before referred to, that “an atmosphere which smells of
-organic decomposition, is an unwholesome atmosphere; that it at least
-favours the spread, perhaps also what may virtually be considered the
-production, of morbid infections.”
-
-It has been urged that the closure of the present louvres and other
-apertures in the side walls will restrict the necessary ventilation;
-I am, however, of a contrary opinion, believing that it can be
-demonstrated by the employment of an anemometer; _that in proportion
-to the exclusion of disturbing currents of air from lateral sources,
-will be an increase in the velocity by which the fresh incoming supply
-will travel through the narrow passage from front to back of the
-premises, and that a readier displacement of vitiated air will result_.
-If this should prove insufficient, a constant upward direction of
-ventilation can be accomplished by well-known mechanical contrivances
-in the roof of each house.
-
-Without reiterating the reasons which have led me to insist upon this
-isolation of each Slaughter-house, I will only advert to the very
-evident facility given for one Slaughter-house to infect its neighbour
-should these side openings be allowed to continue, an objection which
-would apply with fatal force should cattle suffering from contagious
-disease be imported by carelessness or design into any one of them.
-
-It being a well-ascertained fact that myriads of germs or
-disease-spreading organisms may be given off in the cutaneous
-exhalations, the excreta, and, possibly, the very breath of infected
-animals, it is no exaggeration to affirm that one such beast might
-decimate its neighbourhood, affecting alike the living cattle in the
-Pounds and Lairs waiting for slaughter, and the dead meat hanging up to
-cool in the Slaughter-house before it was carried away by the retail
-butchers. In the latter case, the well-known power of warm fat in
-rapidly absorbing all kinds of odours, good and bad, would render every
-precaution to prevent the contamination of the meat already killed
-inoperative.
-
-It is no argument against these measures to urge that their necessity
-has not yet been recognised by the unlearned, or to assert that no
-practical difficulty has arisen in the direction just mentioned,
-for it must be remembered that the great aim of all modern Sanitary
-legislation is to discover disease in its germinal condition, and apply
-such _preventive_ agents as will combat the extension of the mischief
-when once discovered.
-
-Interested persons have asserted that no injury to health has been
-proved to result from the existence of Slaughter-houses, even in
-densely populated and confined situations, but my own experience, and
-that of every practical physician, leads to an opposite opinion; in
-support of which I may recall the circumstance of my having recently
-reported to you an outbreak of scarlet fever in the vicinity of
-the Slaughter-houses in Aldgate, and again as lately as 14th March
-last a case of typhoid fever in Somerset Street, at the back of the
-Slaughter-houses, in a house in immediate connexion with the drains of
-the Slaughter-houses and the “blood house” adjoining. Moreover, it is
-a truism, established by recent researches in vital statistics, that
-slaughterers and butchers should be regarded as an unhealthy class
-of men, since they present a much higher rate of mortality than is
-observed in other trades.
-
-It is now established as an actuarial fact,[3] that this
-unhealthfulness of calling applies to all trades in connection with
-animal food, and this has been supposed to depend, in the case of
-butchers and slaughterers,--_Firstly_, from their constantly inhaling
-an atmosphere impregnated with animal matter;--_Secondly_, from their
-exposure to sudden alternations of temperature and the vicissitudes of
-weather; and,--_Thirdly_, from the large amount of animal food they are
-known to eat. It has also been stated with much force that they are
-necessarily exposed, more than other persons, to fevers and zymotic
-diseases, from their constantly breathing an atmosphere charged with
-decomposing, and often putrescent, animal matter.
-
-Respecting the separation of the Pounds from the Slaughter-houses,
-I still retain a strong conviction that such is both necessary and
-expedient, although I am not insensible of the difficulty of carrying
-it out in some few of the Slaughter-houses, whose cramped dimensions
-render this and other requisite accommodation well nigh impracticable.
-In these cases the owners should be compensated, and the places closed.
-
-Before a clear idea can be entertained of the possible and impossible
-improvements in these Slaughter-houses, I strongly recommend that a
-ground plan[4] be prepared of the whole block in High Street, showing
-to scale the exact size of each Shop, Lair, Slaughter-house, and
-out-building, with so much of the surrounding property as will provide
-a back way into the Slaughter-houses upon a give-and-take line as
-between immediate neighbours; should the owners find it their interest
-to combine for such purpose.
-
-By means of this plan it may be seen how far it may be practicable
-to reconstruct the whole of these places upon one agreed basis, and
-prevent, _inter alia_, the objectionable practice of driving the
-cattle across the public footways into the Slaughter-houses, so much
-complained of.
-
-
-BYE-LAW VI.
-
-That the inner surface of the walls of every Slaughter-house be covered
-with slate, stone, or other hard, smooth, impervious material, to the
-height of 7 feet 6 inches, and that above this height to the roof the
-walls be cemented.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_The Butchers say, “It is a useless expense to extend the smooth,
-impervious material beyond four feet,” and that “there is no practical
-advantage in cementing the whole of the upper part of the walls of
-the Slaughter-house; on the contrary, the hard bricks are superior to
-cement, which will break off.”_
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The height of the “dado” was increased from 4 feet 6 inches to 7 feet 6
-inches, in consequence of my having inspected a Slaughter-house outside
-the City, and finding 4 feet 6 inches insufficient to protect the walls
-above from the splashing of blood and filth, the “dado” itself being
-clean.
-
-In Edinburgh the walls are formed of solid ashler stone to a height of
-_seven feet_.
-
-The advantage of covering the inner surfaces of the Slaughter-house
-walls with an impervious cement are twofold: _Firstly_, the walls can
-be much more easily washed and kept clean. _Secondly_, it obviates the
-liability of the walls becoming saturated with decaying nitrogenous
-matter by the constant absorption of moist animal vapours by porous
-bricks. [This precaution was suggested by a perusal of an account of
-the practical experiments of Professor Pettenkofer, of Munich, who has
-clearly demonstrated in various ways the extreme porosity of ordinary
-brick walls.] _Lastly_, a hard, smooth wall prevents the ingress and
-lodgment of vermin. The question of expense raised by the Butchers is
-hardly worthy of prosperous and wealthy tradesmen, and the objection
-that the cement would “break off” is too frivolous to answer.
-
-
-BYE-LAW VII.
-
-That each Slaughter-house be provided with adequate lairage or
-poundage, separated from the slaughtering space by a closed partition,
-extending from the floor to the roof, formed of brick, stone, slate,
-or other similar material, having a smooth impervious surface, to a
-height of at least 7 feet 6 inches from the floor. That in all cases
-where from the present plan of the premises a door is needed between
-the Lair or Pound and the slaughtering space, such door be provided
-with spring hinges, and be kept closed when not open for the passage
-of cattle, but that where other means exist of taking cattle from the
-Lair or Pound into the Slaughter-house, without passing through shops,
-or over important public ways, no door shall exist between the Lair or
-Pound and the Slaughter-house.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.
-
-_The contention here is that the separation of the Slaughter-houses
-from the Pound will impede ventilation, and that a partition six feet
-high is sufficient for the purpose, the Butchers denying that any
-“offensive effluvia arise from a live animal.” It is assumed that the
-reason for this Bye-law is based primarily upon the idea that the
-animals are distressed by seeing the process of slaughtering whilst
-waiting their turn for the pole-axe. It is further objected that the
-spring hinges are likely to lead to accidents to men and beasts._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The chief considerations in support of this Bye-law are given in the
-extract of my Report on 1st June, 1875, above quoted. I may, however,
-say, in addition, that the possibility of the animals waiting for
-slaughter seeing the process of killing other animals, formed no part
-of the argument.
-
-Again, the Butchers’ objection on the score of ventilation is based
-upon the supposition that the Pound must necessarily be of the
-same height as the Slaughter-house, which does not follow, as the
-accompanying Diagram will show:--
-
-[Illustration]
-
-The spring hinges ordered in this Bye-law will ensure the door between
-the Slaughter-house and Pound being kept closed, but the Butchers may,
-if they prefer it, hang the doors by balance weights, so as to slide
-up and down like an ordinary sash window, by which means the direful
-consequences predicted as likely to result from the use of spring
-hinges may be avoided.
-
-
-BYE-LAW VIII.
-
-That where any Slaughter-house or Pound cannot be sufficiently
-ventilated by openings on to the public ways, or on to other open
-places, it shall be ventilated from the roof, which shall be so
-constructed as to admit freely of the escape of air, and that rings for
-burning gas be fixed in the roof so as to increase the upward current
-when a-light, and that both Slaughter-house and Pound be properly
-lighted either from the public ways or other open spaces, and where
-that be not practicable, then from the roof.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.
-
-_The chief arguments relate to matters quite irrelevant, and are very
-confused and unintelligible. The only part of the “objection” belonging
-to this Bye-law is that which refers to the proposal for increasing
-the efficiency of the ventilation by rings of gas, which the Butchers
-characterise as “absurd.”_
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The question raised here is as to the proper mode of ventilation and
-lighting, and seeing that it would be worse than folly to perpetuate
-the evil of allowing an intercommunication between the side walls of
-some of the present ill-devised, and worse-kept, Slaughter-houses in
-Aldgate High Street, your Committee were driven to the alternative of
-requiring both light and ventilation to be sought for in the roof.
-
-The ring of gas spoken of so contemptuously by the Butchers will have
-the effect of rarefying the vitiated air in the Slaughter-houses during
-the process of slaughtering, and by producing an up-current, quicken
-the ventilation.
-
-Upon this point Mr. Darbyshire, before quoted, says, speaking of
-his work at Manchester, “the Slaughter-houses are well lighted from
-the roofs, top lights being superior to side lights for purposes of
-slaughtering.” All the Markets recently constructed by the Corporation
-of London are similarly lighted and ventilated, and at the Abattoir
-in Edinburgh the whole of the ventilation is carried on by large
-ventilators, and other contrivances, in the roof.
-
-
-BYE-LAW IX.
-
-That each Slaughter-house and Pound be thoroughly washed over the
-entire surface of the walls to the height of 7 feet 6 inches, and
-over the whole surface of the floor directly after slaughtering is
-completed, or at least once in every twenty-four hours.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.
-
-_The substance of the objections raised is that the requirements
-for washing are too stringent, with a reiteration of the grievance
-of a dado 7 feet 6 inches; also the Butchers find it “difficult to
-imagine why the walls and floor of the Pound, as well as those of the
-Slaughter-houses, are to be washed after slaughtering,” and seem to
-imagine that the washing is required every twenty-four hours, including
-Sundays, whether slaughtering is going on or not._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-The provision for thoroughly cleansing, once in each twenty-four
-hours, Slaughter-houses and Pounds that are in constant use, is too
-obviously necessary to require any defence, and the quibble raised by
-the Butchers about Sunday cleaning is, I presume, intended as a joke.
-
-
-BYE-LAW X.
-
-That the internal surface of the roofs and upper portions of the
-wall of the Slaughter-houses and Pounds above the 7 feet 6 inches of
-impermeable surface be washed with quicklime at least once every month.
-
-
-OBJECTIONS.
-
-_That the requirements for the limewhiting are excessive, and that, if
-insisted upon, would be “oppressive and useless.”_
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-I am of opinion that this Bye-law may be relaxed, and that it will
-suffice if the _monthly_ limewhiting be required in the _summer_ only,
-say from May to October; and once in _three_ months in the colder
-seasons, say November to April. The necessity for this periodical
-cleansing with lime would be made abundantly clear if the Local
-Government Board would send one of their own Medical Inspectors to
-see the places as now existing; who would be astonished, as your
-Committee were, to observe the foul, black, sooty, and greasy state of
-all that is left of the ruins of the timbers originally forming the
-roofs of some of the Slaughter-houses in Aldgate, and perhaps concur
-in remarks freely expressed by outsiders, that no regulations can be
-too stringent for the management of a business, which under the most
-careful supervision and with every intelligent precaution, is repulsive
-and offensive to the senses.
-
-Assuming that the observance of the proposed Bye-laws will unavoidably
-compel a partial reconstruction of the Slaughter-houses in Aldgate,
-and substantial repairs in the adjacent structures, the washing
-with quicklime was ordered with a view of providing a suitable and
-inexpensive coating for the new wood-work of the roofs, &c., for, owing
-to the constant presence of Sulphuretted Hydrogen in Slaughter-houses,
-paint is inadmissible from the circumstance that it would speedily
-be turned black by the action of such gas upon any mineral pigment
-employed. The limewhiting if used _hot_ would act as a powerful
-disinfectant and deodoriser, as well as having the effect of greatly
-reflecting the light in the Slaughter-house, and giving the place a
-cool and clean appearance.
-
-The Metropolitan Board of Works in their 6th Bye-law require that “the
-occupier shall keep the inner walls of every Slaughter-house always
-_thoroughly clean_ and in _good order and repair_, and shall cause the
-internal surface of the _roof_ and _upper portions of the walls_ to
-be thoroughly washed with quicklime _at least_ once in _every three
-months_.”
-
-The Butchers have probably overlooked this Bye-law in quoting the
-action of the Metropolitan Board of Works.
-
-
-BYE-LAW XV.
-
-That no Slaughter-house or Pound be used for any purpose other than
-that for which it is licensed, and that no slaughtering be conducted
-within public view.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_The Butchers maintain that the Pound is not included in the Licence
-for the Slaughter-house._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-It is quite true that the word _Pound_ is not used in the Licence for a
-Slaughter-house, but the Act of Parliament, 1874, distinctly provides
-that the Bye-laws shall extend to the “_premises_” generally.
-
-
-BYE-LAW XVIII.
-
-That in case of any diseased or unsound cattle being brought to a
-Slaughter-house, Pound, or Lair, the occupier shall forthwith give
-information thereof to the Medical Officer of Health of the City of
-London.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_That the retention of the word unsound might involve the Butchers in a
-charge of Slaughtering Diseased Meat._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-I should not insist upon the retention of the word “_unsound_” if some
-guarantee could be exacted that the animal would be slaughtered within
-a specified time of the occurrence of any accident which might disable
-it; although it must be remembered that the flesh of a beast suffering
-pain, or deprived of the full use of all its functions, rapidly
-deteriorates in quality and nutrient properties.
-
-
-BYE-LAW XXI.
-
-That every person occupying a Slaughter-house shall cause the works
-needful for complying with these Bye-laws to be forthwith executed,
-and when completed shall not permit any alteration to be made in them
-without the sanction of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of
-London, and that the whole of the works and regulations be carried out
-to the approval of the Medical Officer of Health.
-
-
-OBJECTION.
-
-_That the Medical Officer of Health should not be the judge of the mode
-in which the works ordered by the Bye-laws are executed._
-
-
-REPLY.
-
-This Bye-law provides a salutary check upon the active resistance the
-Butchers seem ever ready to offer to rules intended for their own
-benefit, no less than the protection of the public health, and the
-general arrangements and discipline of a Slaughter-house belonging
-exclusively to the Sanitary Department, your Committee thought it would
-save circumlocution if the Medical Officer of Health was made amenable
-to the Court of Sewers for the due maintenance of the Bye-laws in their
-integrity.
-
-So far, however, as I am concerned I shall be very thankful to be
-relieved from the odious duty of enforcing regulations which are so
-ungraciously acquiesced in by the persons on whose behoof they are
-made, at the same time I shall never shrink from accepting whatever
-responsibility may be connected with my office.
-
-It is quite untrue, as stated by the Butchers’ Trade Society, “that
-the Bye-laws in question have been framed by persons totally without
-practical acquaintance with the trade,” the fact being, that they were
-prepared with the active assistance of several Members of the Committee
-of great experience as providitors, two of whom are large carcass
-butchers, and two others are extensively connected, commercially and
-officially, with the butchering interests, and well informed upon the
-economy of Markets and Slaughter-houses. Again, the Committee was
-attended at each of its sittings by the Deputy of the Ward in which
-the Slaughter-houses are situated, who was specially invited to attend
-upon each occasion, and who generously and frankly avowed himself the
-advocate of the slaughterers. This gentleman took part in all the
-discussions, and argued forcibly and fully every point in connexion
-with the subject; but beyond this, your Committee’s Report was further
-analysed and criticised by the General Court of Sewers, amongst whom
-were many Commissioners practically and intimately acquainted with
-the whole bearings and requirement of the question. As you are aware,
-the Court adopted your Report, without amendment or alteration, being
-satisfied of the wisdom and expediency of the Bye-laws compiled by you.
-
-The remarks of the “Butchers’ Trade Society” relative to the Report
-being passed by the Court of Sewers with “closed doors” require one
-word of explanation: The exclusion of strangers at the time the Report
-was presented was not dictated by any desire to conceal the purport of
-its contents, and indeed had nothing to do with the main question of
-its adoption, but was resolved simply in order that the Solicitor might
-read a confidential communication having reference only to a technical
-legal proposition as to the mode of enforcing the said Bye-laws should
-they be sanctioned by the Local Government Board.
-
-In conclusion, I will only add that, having given my best attention to
-the whole subject, and carefully considered the not very formidable
-“objections” raised by the butchers, I have arrived at the honest
-conviction that no substantial grounds are therein advanced which
-would justify you, as the Sanitary Authority in the City of London, in
-varying the requirements of the Bye-laws submitted for approval to the
-Local Government Board, beyond the concessions herein described.
-
-Adverting to my individual action in the matter, I may here repeat that
-I am quite unconscious of the smallest desire to limit the usefulness
-or cripple the operations of an important and valuable trade, and that
-I have endeavoured to reconcile the desires of the occupiers of the
-Slaughter-houses with the imperative requirements of the public health;
-nevertheless, I cannot help sharing the conviction of all competent
-Sanitarians, that the perpetuation of densely packed Slaughter-houses
-in the midst of a close population, where the introduction of a
-sufficient supply of light, air, and ventilation, is physically
-impossible, was a lamentable error of legislation, which every
-unprejudiced observer admits will, and _must_, be remedied, whenever
-the exigencies of public health are allowed to outweigh the antagonism
-of interested and uncompromising opposition.
-
-I feel it necessary to say as much as this, since I have been credited
-with more than my share in the preparation of the materials upon
-which you have deemed it wise and expedient to frame these Bye-laws,
-an impression which has involved me in no small amount of abuse and
-obloquy.
-
- I have the honour to be,
- GENTLEMEN,
- Your obedient Servant,
-
- WM. SEDGWICK SAUNDERS, M.D.,
- _Medical Officer of Health_.
-
- GUILDHALL,
- _27th June, 1876_.
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[2] The “objections” are quoted in abstract only, in order to save
-space, but the sense of the same has been scrupulously observed.
-
-[3] In a paper on the “Influence of Occupation upon Health,” read by
-Mr. F. G. P. Neilson, F.S.S., before the Institute of Actuaries, and
-published in their Journal, July, 1872, it is shewn that in the forty
-years of age, 25 to 65, the mortality of butchers is 17·9 per thousand
-living, and that of poulterers 21·0, as against 10·6 of gardeners,
-12·4 carpenters, 13·4 shoemakers, 16·8 stonemasons, &c. The results
-were obtained by a comparison of the whole of the mortality of England
-and Wales, 1860-1, with 1,147,243 years of life of members of Friendly
-Societies.
-
-[4] This has since been done, and a copy sent to the Local Government
-Board.
-
-
-
-
-POSTSCRIPT.
-
-
-Since the foregoing was written I have received copies of additional
-documents forwarded by the “Butchers’ Trade Society” to the Local
-Government Board, and, in accordance with your request, have perused
-and considered the same.
-
-These communications begin with a long letter from the above named
-Society, consisting of extracts from my Report on Slaughter-houses,
-dated 1st June, 1875, with observations upon the same, given point by
-point in parallel columns.
-
-These remarks are really little more than a “_réchauffé_” of those
-already set forth in the voluminous epistle of the Society, dated 10th
-April, 1876, addressed to the Local Government Board, and I fail to
-recognise any more important differences than the following, viz., some
-very ungracious and totally irrelevant reflections upon the conduct
-of the District Sanitary Inspectors, for the forbearance shown by
-those officers in allowing the greatest latitude as to the defects and
-nuisances observed in the butchers’ premises to continue with as little
-interference as possible until the new _régime_ could be established;
-also a statement that your Engineer is at variance with myself in the
-recommendations given to your Committee, the truth being that they were
-prepared by that officer in conjunction with your Solicitor and myself.
-Further, the Society inform the Local Government Board, that disease
-germs have never been known to rise to a height of six feet, and that
-therefore the side walls separating adjoining Slaughter-houses need not
-be built as high as the Bye-laws require! This is a fair sample of the
-recklessness with which the “Butchers’ Trade Society’s” last production
-has been framed, and pays a poor compliment to the discrimination
-of the Local Government Board, who may, if they think fit, educate
-the Society to the fact that disease germs have been known to travel
-many thousands of miles, carrying with them cholera and kindred
-diseases from the far East to the distant West;--a corresponding
-degree of ignorance characterises the dicta of the butchers upon
-the physical laws which govern the movements of currents of air,
-and which for convenience is called ventilation. Again, the Society
-claim an exceptional state of salubrity and freedom from disease for
-butchers as a class--a proposition which I have already shown you is
-untenable. Further information may be obtained upon this subject from
-a Report written by Dr. Buchanan, one of the Medical Inspectors of
-the Local Government Board, upon the connection between scarlet fever
-and cow sheds, in a district under his charge. Lastly, the Society
-ask, whether in my judgment the butchers would be less unhealthy in
-the Slaughter-houses as arranged according to my plan, and I answer
-broadly and unhesitatingly, Yes.
-
-The remaining letters comprise one from the Reverend the Vicar of
-St. Botolph, whose testimony as to the general condition of the
-Slaughter-houses is opposed to the evidence of your own senses when
-visiting the places, and is otherwise grossly inaccurate; also
-letters from two resident medical practitioners certifying as to
-the healthiness of the neighbourhood of Aldgate in general, and
-the Slaughter-houses in particular--also a detailed Report from a
-Metropolitan Medical Officer of Health, who has so implicitly adopted
-every “objection” made by the butchers to your Bye-laws, that I am
-irresistibly forced to the conclusion that he is either the author of
-such “objections,” or has lent a too credent ear to the gentleman he
-mentions as having accompanied him in his survey, and “who gave him
-much valuable information, statistical and otherwise.” Upon fairly
-balancing the whole matter, I cannot see any reason to modify the
-opinions expressed in my Report of 27th June last, and in apportioning
-the value to be awarded to the conflicting testimony offered to you,
-I must ask you to remember that the strenuous efforts in the way of
-resistance made by the butchers, and my own justification of the
-principles of right and propriety, which have alone dictated my advice,
-rest upon totally distinct bases.
-
- W. S. S.
-
- GUILDHALL,
- _14th July, 1876_.
-
-
-CHARLES SKIPPER AND EAST, PRINTERS, ST. DUNSTAN’S HILL, E.C.
-
-
-PLAN OF SLAUGHTER-HOUSES IN THE CITY OF LONDON.
-
-
-NOTE
-
- _The_ Light Red Tint, _shews buildings principally constructed of
- Brick_.
-
- _The_ Red Tint, _shews Buildings constructed of Brick, and Inhabited_.
-
- _The_ Yellow Tint, _shews buildings principally constructed of Wood_.
-
- _William Haywood_
- _July 1876_
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber’s Notes
-
-In a few cases, minor errors in punctuation have been fixed.
-
-*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK REPORT OF THE SANITARY
-COMMITTEE OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF SEWERS OF THE CITY OF LONDON, TOGETHER
-WITH A REPORT OF THE MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH ON THE OBJECTIONS RAISED
-BY THE BUTCHERS' TRADE SOCIETY TO THE BYE-LAWS PROPOSED FOR THE
-REGULATION OF SLAUGHTER-HOUSES ***
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the
-United States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
- you are located before using this eBook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that:
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without
-widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/old/67634-0.zip b/old/67634-0.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index 5c689ba..0000000
--- a/old/67634-0.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/67634-h.zip b/old/67634-h.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index a25d408..0000000
--- a/old/67634-h.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/67634-h/67634-h.htm b/old/67634-h/67634-h.htm
deleted file mode 100644
index 6c9d12f..0000000
--- a/old/67634-h/67634-h.htm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,1823 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
- "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
-<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
- <head>
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
- <title>
- Report of the sanitary committee of the commissioners of sewers of the city of London, by W. Sedgwick Saunders&mdash;A Project Gutenberg eBook
- </title>
- <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" />
- <style type="text/css">
-
-body {
- margin-left: 10%;
- margin-right: 10%;
-}
-
- h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
- text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
- clear: both;
-}
-
-p {
- margin-top: .51em;
- text-align: justify;
- margin-bottom: .49em;
- text-indent: 1em;
-}
-
-.vbig {font-size: 1.4em;}
-.big {font-size: 1.2em;}
-.small {font-size: 0.8em;}
-.vsmall {font-size: 0.6em;}
-
-.p2 {margin-top: 2em;}
-.p4 {margin-top: 4em;}
-.p0 {text-indent: 0em;}
-
-hr {
- width: 33%;
- margin-top: 2em;
- margin-bottom: 2em;
- margin-left: 33.5%;
- margin-right: 33.5%;
- clear: both;
-}
-
-hr.chap {width: 65%; margin-left: 17.5%; margin-right: 17.5%;}
-@media print { hr.chap {display: none; visibility: hidden;} }
-
-hr.r5 {width: 5%; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 47.5%; margin-right: 47.5%;}
-hr.r65 {width: 65%; margin-top: 3em; margin-bottom: 3em; margin-left: 17.5%; margin-right: 17.5%;}
-
-div.chapter {page-break-before: always;}
-h2.nobreak {page-break-before: avoid;}
-
-
-abbr[title] {text-decoration: none;}
-
-.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
- /* visibility: hidden; */
- position: absolute;
- left: 92%;
- font-size: smaller;
- text-align: right;
- font-style: normal;
- font-weight: normal;
- font-variant: normal;
-} /* page numbers */
-
-.blockquot {
- margin-left: 5%;
- margin-right: 5%;
-}
-
-.center {text-align: center;}
-
-.right {text-align: right;}
-
-.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
-
-.caption {font-weight: bold;}
-
-/* Images */
-
-img {
- max-width: 100%;
- height: auto;
-}
-img.w75 {width: 75%;}
-.x-ebookmaker .w75 {width: 100%;}
-
-
-.figcenter {
- margin: auto;
- text-align: center;
- page-break-inside: avoid;
- max-width: 100%;
-}
-
-
-
-/* Footnotes */
-.footnotes {border: 1px dashed; margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 5%;}
-
-.footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;}
-
-.fnanchor {
- vertical-align: super;
- font-size: .8em;
- text-decoration:
- none;
-}
-
-/* Transcriber's notes */
-.transnote {background-color: #E6E6FA;
- color: black;
- font-size:smaller;
- padding:0.5em;
- margin-bottom:5em;
- font-family:sans-serif, serif; }
-
- </style>
- </head>
-<body>
-<p style='text-align:center; font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold'>The Project Gutenberg eBook of Report of the sanitary committee of the commissioners of sewers of the city of London, together with a report of the medical officer of health on the objections raised by the Butchers' Trade Society to the bye-laws proposed for the regulation of slaughter-houses, by Wm. Sedgwick Saunders</p>
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
-at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you
-are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the
-country where you are located before using this eBook.
-</div>
-
-<p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Title: Report of the sanitary committee of the commissioners of sewers of the city of London, together with a report of the medical officer of health on the objections raised by the Butchers' Trade Society to the bye-laws proposed for the regulation of slaughter-houses</p>
-<p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Author: Wm. Sedgwick Saunders</p>
-<p style='display:block; text-indent:0; margin:1em 0'>Release Date: March 15, 2022 [eBook #67634]</p>
-<p style='display:block; text-indent:0; margin:1em 0'>Language: English</p>
- <p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left'>Produced by: deaurider and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)</p>
-<div style='margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:4em'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK REPORT OF THE SANITARY COMMITTEE OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF SEWERS OF THE CITY OF LONDON, TOGETHER WITH A REPORT OF THE MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH ON THE OBJECTIONS RAISED BY THE BUTCHERS' TRADE SOCIETY TO THE BYE-LAWS PROPOSED FOR THE REGULATION OF SLAUGHTER-HOUSES ***</div>
-
-
-
-
-<h1><span class="big">REPORT</span><br /> <br />
-<span class="vsmall">OF THE</span><br /> <br />
-SANITARY COMMITTEE<br /> <br />
-<span class="vsmall">OF THE</span><br /><br />
-<span class="small">COMMISSIONERS OF SEWERS OF THE CITY OF LONDON,</span></h1>
-
-<p class="center p0 small"> TOGETHER WITH A</p>
-
-<p class="center p0 vbig"> REPORT</p>
-
-<p class="center p0 small"> OF THE</p>
-
-<p class="center p0 vbig"> MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH</p>
-
-<p class="center p0 small"> ON</p>
-
-<p class="center p0"> THE OBJECTIONS RAISED BY THE BUTCHERS’
- TRADE SOCIETY TO THE BYE-LAWS PROPOSED FOR
- THE REGULATION OF</p>
-
-<p class="center p0 vbig">SLAUGHTER-HOUSES.</p>
-
-<p class="center p0 p4"> LONDON:<br />
-<span class="small">CHARLES SKIPPER &amp; EAST, PRINTERS, ST. DUNSTAN’S HILL, E.C.</span></p>
-<hr class="r5" />
-<p class="center p0"> 1876.
-</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-<div class="chapter">
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</span></p>
-
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p><i>At a Meeting of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of London,
-held at the Guildhall, on Tuesday, the 4th day of July, 1876,</i></p>
-</div>
-
-<p class="center p0">FREDERICK COX, <span class="smcap"><abbr title="Esquire">Esq.</abbr>, in the Chair</span>.</p>
-
-<hr class="r5" />
-<p>A Report from the Sanitary Committee (<span class="smcap">William Cave Fowler</span>,
-Esq., Deputy, Deputy-Chairman), dated this day, was read&mdash;</p>
-
-<p>On the Reference of the 23rd of May last, to consider the Letter
-from the Local Government Board relative to the Slaughter-house
-Bye-laws agreed to on the 14th of March last, and submitted to the
-Local Government Board for confirmation, and on the objections of the
-Butchers’ Trade Society to the said Bye-laws.</p>
-
-<p>Submitting a Report from the Medical Officer of Health in reply to
-the said objections, and recommending the Commissioners’ concurrence
-therein.</p>
-
-
-<p><span class="smcap">Resolved</span>&mdash;</p>
-
-<p>That this Court doth agree with the Committee in their said Report, and
-doth confirm and adopt the same.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</span></p>
-
-
-<p><span class="smcap">Ordered</span>&mdash;</p>
-
-<p>That a Copy of the Medical Officer’s Report be sent to the Local
-Government Board in reply to their Communications therein referred to.</p>
-
-
-<p><span class="smcap">Ordered</span>&mdash;</p>
-
-<p>That the Report be printed, and circulated as usual.</p>
-
-<p class="right p0">
-<span style="margin-right: 1em;">HENRY BLAKE,</span><br />
-<i>Principal Clerk</i>.<br />
-</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</span></p>
-
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<h2> REPORT <br /><br />
-<span class="vsmall">OF THE</span> <br /><br />
-SANITARY COMMITTEE.<br />
-</h2>
-
-</div>
-<p>We have, in accordance with your Reference to us of the 23rd May
-last, considered the letter from the Local Government Board, dated
-the 13th of May, relative to the new Bye-laws for the management
-of Slaughter-houses within the City of London, agreed to by your
-Honourable Court on the 14th of March last, and submitted to the Local
-Government Board for confirmation. Also we have carefully considered
-the letter of <abbr title="misters">Messrs.</abbr> Crouch and Spencer, with objections on behalf of
-the Butchers’ Trade Society, to the said Bye-laws, enclosed in the said
-letter from the Local Government Board for your observations.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</span></p>
-
-<p>We requested the Medical Officer of Health to give a detailed Report
-in regard to the objections raised by the Butchers’ Trade Society to
-the said Bye-laws, and we beg now to submit the same to your Honourable
-Court.</p>
-
-<p>We have carefully considered the said Report, with the Bye-laws, and
-the said communications from the Local Government Board.</p>
-
-<p>We have also received and considered a further communication from the
-Local Government Board, with copy of a letter from <abbr title="misters">Messrs.</abbr> Crouch and
-Spencer, enclosing further objections on behalf of the Butchers’ Trade
-Society to the said Bye-laws, also a Report from a <abbr title="doctor">Dr.</abbr> Whitmore, and
-letters from certain residents of Aldgate in support of such objections.</p>
-
-<p>We beg to recommend that your Honourable Court concur in the Report of
-the Medical Officer of Health, and that a copy thereof be forwarded to
-the Local Government Board in reply to their communication of the 13th
-ulto.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</span></p>
-
-<p>The effect of this will be, to adhere to the several proposed Bye-laws,
-except that as regards Bye-law <abbr title="number">No.</abbr> 10, which is as follows:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“That the internal surface of the roofs and upper portions of the
-walls of the Slaughter-houses and Pounds, above the 7 <abbr title="feet">ft.</abbr> 6 <abbr title="inches">in.</abbr> of
-impermeable surface, be washed with quicklime at least once every
-month.”</p>
-</div>
-
-<p>It is suggested that it may be so far relaxed, that the monthly
-limewhiting be required in the summer only, say from May to October,
-and that in the winter months, say from November to April, the
-limewhiting be required to be done once in three months.</p>
-
-<p>And as regards Bye-law <abbr title="number">No.</abbr> 18, which is as follows:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“That in case of any diseased or unsound cattle being brought to a
-Slaughter-house, Pound, or Lair, the occupier shall forthwith give
-information thereof to the Medical Officer of Health of the City of
-London.”</p>
-</div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</span></p>
-
-<p>It is proposed not to insist upon the retention of the word “unsound,”
-provided that the animals be slaughtered within a specified time of the
-occurrence of any accident that may disable them.</p>
-
-<p>All which we submit to the judgment of your Honourable Court.</p>
-
-<p>Dated this 4th day of July, 1876.</p>
-
-<p class="right p0">
-(Signed)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<abbr title="Frederick">FREDᴷ.</abbr> COX.<br />
-W. C. FOWLER.<br />
-H. H. HEATH.<br />
-W. I. LOWE.
-</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</span></p>
-
-
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-<div class="chapter">
-<h2>REPORT<br />
-<span class="vsmall">OF THE</span><br />
-MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH.
-</h2>
-<hr class="r5" />
-</div>
-
-<p class="blockquot">
-<i>To the Sanitary Committee of the Honourable the Commissioners of Sewers.</i><br /></p>
-<p>
-<span class="smcap">Gentlemen</span>,<br />
-</p>
-
-<p>In compliance with your request that I should “give a detailed Report
-in regard to the objections raised by the ‘Butchers’ Trade Society’
-to the proposed ‘Bye-laws’” for the better conduct and regulation of
-Slaughter-houses within the City of London, agreed to by the Honourable
-the Court of Sewers, and submitted by them to the Local Government
-Board for confirmation, and which “objections” were contained in a
-letter forwarded to the said Board by the said Society, a copy of which
-was sent to your Committee by the said Board for your consideration and
-observations thereon, I beg to offer the following remarks:</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</span></p>
-
-<p>There are 27 Slaughter-houses in the City of London, viz.: 24 in
-Aldgate,<span class="fnanchor" id="fna1"><a href="#fn1">[1]</a></span> 1 in Bishopsgate, 1 in Farringdon, and 1 in Cripplegate
-Ward: of these the following observations apply exclusively to Aldgate,
-no “objections” to the Bye-laws having been expressed by the occupiers
-of the remaining three.</p>
-
-<p>The Bye-laws referred to were framed with a full knowledge of
-the intended, and indeed threatened, opposition on the part of
-the slaughterers and butchers of Aldgate, and every “objection”
-mentioned in their letter to the Local Government Board was fully
-and dispassionately discussed by your Committee during many lengthy
-sittings, at each of which they invited, and were favoured by, the
-presence of the Deputy of the Ward in which the Slaughter-houses are
-situated.</p>
-
-<p>This gentleman ably and forcibly supported the views propounded by the
-butchers, and evinced the keenest anxiety to protect their interests.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</span></p>
-
-<p>Subsequently your recommendations respecting these Bye-laws were
-adopted with surprising unanimity by the Honourable the Court of Sewers
-without amendment or alteration; a number of Commissioners then being
-present who are immediately interested in the butchering business, and
-practically acquainted with its wants, concurring in their acceptance.</p>
-
-<p>The initial difficulty in dealing with this question arises from the
-anomalous conditions as to size, number, and areas, to be found in the
-Slaughter-houses and adjoining premises at Aldgate.</p>
-
-<p>The twenty-four Slaughter-houses in Aldgate are, with one or two
-exceptions, situated side by side; all have a direct communication with
-a shop facing High Street, Whitechapel, and six of them have no other
-means for the entrance of cattle than by their being driven across the
-footways and through the shop; a practice which renders the pavement at
-times impassable, and causes terror and annoyance to the public. These
-shops are for the most part low in ceiling height, and very narrow
-in frontage, <b>one being but 9 <abbr title="feet">ft.</abbr> wide,&mdash;two 10 <abbr title="feet">ft.</abbr>,&mdash;one 10 <abbr title="feet">ft.</abbr> 6
-<abbr title="inches">in.</abbr>,&mdash;two 11 <abbr title="feet">ft.</abbr></b>,&mdash;and so<span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</span> on. In some of them the Slaughter-house
-widens in the back part of the premises, but in several, viz., at <abbr title="numbers">Nos.</abbr>
-55, 58, 59, 60, 68, and 73, the whole business of a retail butcher and
-slaughterer is conducted in the narrow strips above quoted.</p>
-
-<p>Your Committee having viewed these places, will recollect that at <abbr title="number">No.</abbr>
-73, where the extreme width of the Shop and Slaughter-house was but 9
-<abbr title="feet">ft.</abbr>, there was no room to pass up and down the Slaughter-house when the
-carcasses of the slaughtered animals were hanging, excepting by moving
-sideways, and that the atmosphere of the place was pervaded by a hot,
-moist, sickening vapour, for want of thorough ventilation; you must
-also have remarked upon the general state of disrepair of the whole
-of these Slaughter-houses, the dilapidated roofs, the blood-stained
-and filthy state of the side walls, the uneven and broken condition
-of the flooring, the imperfect, totally inadequate, and badly placed
-water supply, the large accumulations of dung, offal, and blood, and
-the defective and sluggish drainage, down the gratings of which you
-could not fail to have seen a plentiful flow of crude liquid manure,
-which the man in charge was<span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</span> industriously sweeping into the sewers,
-to their great pollution; all these indicate a state of neglect which
-could only have arisen from a consciousness on the part of the owners
-and occupiers that the Legislature intended to abolish such places as
-private Slaughter-houses upon the expiration of the Act of 1844, 7th
-and 8th Vict., c. 84. Unfortunately, however, the so-called vested
-interests of the butchers proved too strong with the Government for the
-protection of the public, and Parliament in 1874, by the 37th and 38th
-Vict., c. 67, was induced to perpetuate these Slaughter-houses in the
-City of London, under such regulations it is your province to make and
-maintain.</p>
-
-<p>In order to be consistent, and to enable the Court of Sewers to
-exercise a proper amount of control, each Slaughter-house must be
-treated as a separate and independent building; and, in advising you as
-to the best mode of securing such control, it has ever been a source
-of deep anxiety and considerable embarrassment to me, how best to
-reconcile the wants of modern sanitation, decency, and order, with the
-inevitable sacrifices on the part of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</span> occupiers of the smallest
-of these places, which I foresee and confess to be demanded by the
-institution of thorough disciplinary measures.</p>
-
-<p>The necessity for treating each Slaughter-house as a distinct structure
-“<i lang="la" xml:lang="la">per se</i>,” and the apparent consciousness of the inability of
-the holders of the smaller ones to adapt themselves to efficient
-regulations, is, I believe, the main cause of the opposition now made
-to the Bye-laws, for I have reason to know that the occupiers of the
-larger Slaughter-houses are ready to conform to the spirit of the
-Bye-laws, albeit they are not in accord with us as to some of the
-provisions therein.</p>
-
-<p>Under the peculiar and exceptional circumstances of the case before
-us, the question of dimensions so completely underlies the whole
-contention, that I earnestly hope your Committee will call the
-particular attention of the Local Government Board to the <i>size</i> of these
-small Slaughter-houses, as shown on the Plan made to scale by your
-Engineer, and forwarded to the Board some time ago [a copy of which,
-upon a reduced scale, is appended <a href="#img002">hereto</a>]; for I can scarcely imagine
-that the Board have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</span> the least idea of the diminutive space in which
-slaughtering <em>on a large scale is going on night and day</em> in
-defiance of the principles of health or humanity.</p>
-
-<p>The Board should also be informed that the slaughtering effected in
-these places extends far beyond the requirements of the neighbourhood,
-and that the plea of the Butchers that they provide marketable
-commodities suitable to the necessities of the poor of their locality
-is essentially unsound, from an economical point of view, it having
-been found in places where Abattoirs obtain, that the poor readily
-follow any market which offers them pecuniary advantages.</p>
-
-<p>I now proceed to notice the various “objections” advanced in the letter
-of the “Butchers’ Trade Society”:&mdash;They relate, for the most part, to
-the <em>structural</em> repairs rendered necessary by the present ruinous
-condition of the Aldgate Slaughter-houses generally, which, in spite of
-admitted neglect, due to their owners having expected their demolition
-in 1874, when the Act of 1834 affecting Slaughter-houses expired, are
-now resisted upon the score of expense.</p>
-
-
-<div class="footnotes p2"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</span></p>
-
-<p class="footnote" id="fn1"><a href="#fna1">[1]</a> These Slaughter-houses are really in Portsoken Ward, but they are
-always quoted as of Aldgate Ward, and will be so described in this
-Report to avoid confusion.</p>
-</div>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="REPLY_TO_OBJECTIONS_OF_THE_BUTCHERS_TRADE_SOCIETY_TO_THE_BYE-LAWS">REPLY TO “OBJECTIONS” OF THE “BUTCHERS’ TRADE SOCIETY” TO THE BYE-LAWS.</h2>
-</div>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law I.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That each Slaughter-house be paved with asphalte, laid with proper
-slopes and channels towards a trapped gully, and, where practicable,
-such gully shall be outside the Slaughter-house and Pound.</p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objections.</span><span class="fnanchor" id="fna2"><a href="#fn2">[2]</a></span></h4>
-
-<p><i>The Butchers demur, firstly, to the use of asphalte, and, secondly,
-to the gully being placed outside the Slaughter-house.</i></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>The reason for insisting upon <em>asphalte</em> is to avoid
-<em>joints</em>, which are inevitable in every other kind of pavement.</p>
-
-<p>The joints in stone pavements, however well laid, cannot be made
-durable, owing to the frequent concussions produced by the animals
-falling heavily<span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</span> and suddenly when pole-axed, and the joints being once
-cracked or broken readily admit through their interstices every kind of
-liquid filth, which accumulates in the subsoil and decomposes there.</p>
-
-<p>The flooring of the present Slaughter-houses in Aldgate is composed of
-small, and badly laid, flag-stones, &amp;c., which are loose, broken, and
-uneven in many places, and which cannot be properly cleansed on account
-of the inequalities of the surfaces.</p>
-
-<p>The retention of this Bye-law will, of course, prevent the replacement
-of the old flag-stones upon the reconstruction of the Slaughter-houses,
-and involve the owners in some expense.</p>
-
-<p>A smooth jointless pavement for Slaughter-houses was unanimously
-considered the best at a meeting of the Royal Institute of British
-Architects, in a discussion which followed the reading of a paper by
-Mr. Darbyshire, on Public Abattoirs, 1st February, 1875.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</span></p>
-
-<p>The Metropolitan Board of Works is quoted by the “Butchers’ Trade
-Society” as sanctioning the use of flag-stones, but this is scarcely
-ingenuous, the truth being that the Board recommend <em>asphalte</em> in
-the <em>first instance</em>, but allow flag-stones set in cement as an
-<em>alternative</em>.</p>
-
-<p>The advantage of placing the gully <em>outside</em> the Slaughter-houses,
-is that it prevents the admission of solid matters into the drains, and
-provided the floor be laid at a proper inclination towards the door,
-all fluid materials can be readily conducted thence by gravitation into
-the drain beyond, by means of sunken stone channels, or cast-iron boxes
-having hinges, without the creation of unavoidable nuisance. These
-channels should be provided at certain intervals with what are termed
-“grids,” which prevent anything but liquids passing into the drain or
-sewer.</p>
-
-<p>“The <em>grids</em> are hinged to fall back against the walls, and, on
-being opened, reveal a cast-iron box or chamber, with a flange all
-round the top edge, which rests on a rebate cast on the outer shell;
-this box is movable, and is perforated through the bottom<span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</span> and sides;
-under the movable box is another chamber opening direct into the trap,
-which is cast to the outer shell of the frame work.”&mdash;(Darbyshire on
-Abattoirs.)&mdash;These grids are in daily use at Manchester and elsewhere,
-and are made by Bunnett and Co.</p>
-
-<p>The scavengers should attend to the movable boxes at regular intervals,
-and cart away all solid matter.</p>
-
-<p>In the Edinburgh Abattoirs there are “two distinct sets of drains,
-one for the surface water, which is conveyed directly into Lochrin
-burn, the other for the soil, which is conveyed into large tanks,
-prepared for its reception, and sold for agricultural purposes.”
-(<i>Encyclopædia Britannica.</i>)</p>
-
-<p>It is impossible to over-estimate the importance of excluding blood,
-offal or dung, &amp;c., from the sewers at all times, but especially in
-seasons of epidemic zymotic diseases, and it would be an inestimable
-boon, and one by no means difficult of accomplishment, if the Scotch
-system could be imitated at Aldgate.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</span></p>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law II.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That each Slaughter-house be drained by a glazed pipe drain, not less
-than six inches in diameter, set in concrete and jointed in cement,
-or otherwise made impermeable, and communicating directly with the
-public sewer. That the gully at the inlet to the drain be trapped
-with a stoneware syphon-trap, or other trap of approved material and
-construction, and be covered with a grating, the bars of which shall
-not be more than three-eighths of an inch apart; the grating to be
-fastened with a lock and key, and kept at all times locked, unless
-opened for cleansing or repair.</p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objection.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>That “it is very doubtful whether setting the drain pipes in
-cement, whereby they cannot be got at, except by great breakage and
-disturbance, is at all advantageous.”</i></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>The advantages claimed for setting the drain pipes in, and upon cement,
-are durability and strength; and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</span> if a pipe of six inches diameter be
-used, there is but little liability of its becoming choked or requiring
-repair for many years. Drain pipes laid on soft subsoil materials
-frequently break asunder from the subsidence of such a matrix, or from
-heavy weights falling suddenly upon them, from above, and our daily
-sanitary work furnishes abundant evidence of the danger to health
-arising from the fracture of drain pipes, where originally placed upon
-improper ground, and especially when under such circumstances they are
-subjected to violent blows.</p>
-
-<p>In Edinburgh the Slaughter-houses are “laid with a thick well-dressed
-pavement, resting on a stratum of concrete twelve inches thick.”</p>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law IV.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That each Slaughter-house be provided with adequate cisternage and
-water supply, or, where practicable, with a <em>constant</em> supply
-of water, and such arrangement of pipes as will enable the pavement
-and the walls to the height of 7 feet 6 inches to be conveniently and
-quickly washed.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</span></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objection.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>The Butchers urge that</i> four <i>feet is sufficiently high for the
-washing of the walls.</i></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>The necessity for this alteration will be dealt with under remarks upon
-<a href="#bl6">Bye-law <abbr title="number">No.</abbr> 6</a>.</p>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law V.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That each Slaughter-house be separated from any adjoining
-Slaughter-house in a different occupation by a brick wall, of at least
-nine inches in thickness, extending from the ground to the roof, so as
-effectually to shut off all atmospheric communication between it and
-the adjacent Slaughter-house.</p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objections.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>The Butchers object to the brick side walls between adjoining
-Slaughter-houses being more than six or seven feet high, above which
-they would have placed “the largest possible openings, fitted with
-louvre boards.” They are of opinion “that the best construction in the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</span>
-case of a row of Slaughter-houses would be, that there should exist
-means of thorough ventilation from end to end and side to side.”</i></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>This involves the most important change in the reconstruction of the
-Slaughter-houses, and in order to explain my views fully upon the
-matter, and avoid paraphrasing the same ideas, I must reiterate, almost
-“<i lang="la" xml:lang="la">ipsissima verba</i>” the observations contained in my Report upon
-the subject presented to you in June last, with such omissions or
-alterations more recent information has enabled me to obtain.</p>
-
-<p>I may, however, premise by stating that the present divisional
-walls between the several Slaughter-houses are composed of wet,
-partially rotten, and rugged, brickwork below, and rough, imperfect,
-and defective, wooden partitions above, the whole of which are
-supersaturated with organic animal matters, grease, and dirt.</p>
-
-<p>The faulty construction of these Slaughter-houses was clearly brought
-before the notice of the Select<span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</span> Committee of the House of Commons
-in the evidence given by Sir J. Ogilvy and others, as recently as
-1873, but the only action taken by Parliament to remedy the same in
-the Slaughter-house Act of 1874 (which was based mainly upon the
-recommendations of the said Committee) is comprised in Section 4, which
-directs that “The Local Authority may from time to time <em>make</em>,
-<em>alter</em>, and <em>repeal</em> Bye-laws for regulating the conduct
-of any business specified in this Act, which is for the time being
-lawfully carried on within their jurisdiction, and the <i>structure
-of the premises on which such business is being carried on</i>,” &amp;c.
-And in order to protect the trade from arbitrary action on the part of
-any local authority, it is further enacted that “any Bye-law made in
-pursuance of this section, and any alteration made therein, and any
-repeal of a Bye-law, shall not be of any validity until it has been
-confirmed by the Local Government Board.”</p>
-
-<p>It is quite clear, therefore, that you are acting strictly within your
-legal rights in calling upon the Butchers to put their houses in order.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</span></p>
-
-<p>Your visit to Aldgate must have convinced you that the premises of
-these Slaughter-houses generally are too small for the enormous amount
-of business done in them, and as, owing to the natural increment
-of the population, this evil must ever be augmenting, it becomes a
-serious question to determine whether a strong remonstrance should
-not be addressed by the Commissioners of Sewers to Her Majesty’s
-Government, or failing this to Parliament, against the continuance of
-the smaller of these places, or by insisting that slaughtering should
-only be carried on in houses of such dimensions as would ensure perfect
-ventilation, and provide the means of carrying on the process with
-efficiency. In order to perfect your powers, and establish a wholesome
-check upon the slaughterers, a short Act might be obtained, giving the
-Commissioners of Sewers authority to issue fresh licences, without
-which no Slaughter-houses should be allowed to exist. The present
-licences were issued in 1848, and have not been revised since that
-time, whereas outside the City they are (as they ought to be) renewed
-yearly.</p>
-
-<p><i>In the exercise of this important jurisdiction, the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</span> Metropolitan
-Board of Works have actually abolished 284 Slaughter-houses during
-the year 1875, having licensed 1,068 Slaughter-houses during the same
-period.</i></p>
-
-<p>Respecting the technical means to be adopted to remedy the admitted
-defects of these Slaughter-houses, your Engineer will advise you;
-but, without trenching upon the ground of that officer, it must, I
-think, be patent that nothing short of an entire reconstruction of
-the side walls and roofs of all of them will satisfy the requirements
-of scientific sanitation, or ensure that complete <em>isolation</em> of
-each house, which is <em>the one essential requisite for carrying on the
-business of slaughtering with due regard to the public health</em>. It
-is therefore a <i lang="la" xml:lang="la">sine qua non</i> that there should be a solid brick
-partition or side wall between each Slaughter-house, and that the only
-opening allowed therein should be for a door (where required), on the
-ground level, and that this wall should extend from the floor to the
-highest point of the roof. An exception to this may be made in those
-places in which an open air passage of 4 or 5 <abbr title="feet">ft.</abbr> wide exists between
-the side walls of two Slaughter-houses, for here it might be admissible
-to supplement other<span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</span> means of ventilation and light by glazed sashes,
-which, however, must be so made as to be readily closed, should, by
-any accidental circumstance or oversight, a beast affected with any
-contagious disease be found in the adjoining house.</p>
-
-<p>Second only in importance to the closure of these side openings,
-is the provision that the internal facing of all the walls in the
-Slaughter-house should be of a non-absorbing nature, and I am still of
-the opinion, which I ventured to urge unsuccessfully when the Bye-laws
-were framed in November, 1874, viz., that the height mentioned in
-<a href="#bl6">Bye-law VI.</a> is insufficient for the purpose, and that the <em>whole
-wall-surface</em> should be coated with a “hard, smooth, and impervious
-material,” such as is now used in the wards of our best Metropolitan
-hospitals. When this is done, the disgusting and blood-stained
-appearance, seen on the walls of these Slaughter-houses on your recent
-visit, will be impossible, and one fertile source of disease averted.</p>
-
-<p>I entertain a strong objection to the partitions in any part of the
-Slaughter-house, Pound, or Lair, being<span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</span> constructed of wood, for the
-reason that this material becomes rapidly sodden by the constant
-presence of hot moist air, in which state it must inevitably absorb
-noxious and other vapours, and soon become saturated with albuminoid
-organic matter, and afford a ready nidus for the development and
-propagation of any disease germs which may be floating in the air.</p>
-
-<p>The Butchers deny the existence of unpleasant odours in
-Slaughter-houses; but whilst freely admitting this to be a matter in
-which the senses of ordinary men may be differently affected to those
-of persons constantly living in and enjoying an atmosphere, however
-nauseous, I must insist that the air within a Slaughter-house can never
-be wholesome so long as the disgusting practice of opening the paunches
-of hot, reeking animals, directly after they are knocked down, is
-allowed to continue.</p>
-
-<p>From the nature of the food eaten by ruminants, and during its
-disintegration and assimilation, enormous quantities of stinking
-volatile gases are formed, and the sudden disengaging of these when the
-intestines are ripped up and emptied, before being<span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</span> handed over to the
-tripe-dresser, must always fill the surrounding air with what common
-mortals would consider vile and poisonous smells.</p>
-
-<p>You may remember I urged you to make a Bye-law prohibiting this custom,
-and I regret the more it was overruled in Committee, since the only
-excuse offered for its continuance was the very inadequate plea that
-the guts of a large animal were too heavy and bulky to be removed
-without being first deprived of their contents.</p>
-
-<p><abbr title="mister">Mr.</abbr> Simon, C.B., F.R.S., &amp;c., &amp;c., my talented predecessor, insisted in
-the Blue Book before referred to, that “an atmosphere which smells of
-organic decomposition, is an unwholesome atmosphere; that it at least
-favours the spread, perhaps also what may virtually be considered the
-production, of morbid infections.”</p>
-
-<p>It has been urged that the closure of the present louvres and other
-apertures in the side walls will restrict the necessary ventilation;
-I am, however, of a contrary opinion, believing that it can be
-demonstrated<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</span> by the employment of an anemometer; <em>that in proportion
-to the exclusion of disturbing currents of air from lateral sources,
-will be an increase in the velocity by which the fresh incoming
-supply will travel through the narrow passage from front to back of
-the premises, and that a readier displacement of vitiated air will
-result</em>. If this should prove insufficient, a constant upward
-direction of ventilation can be accomplished by well-known mechanical
-contrivances in the roof of each house.</p>
-
-<p>Without reiterating the reasons which have led me to insist upon this
-isolation of each Slaughter-house, I will only advert to the very
-evident facility given for one Slaughter-house to infect its neighbour
-should these side openings be allowed to continue, an objection which
-would apply with fatal force should cattle suffering from contagious
-disease be imported by carelessness or design into any one of them.</p>
-
-<p>It being a well-ascertained fact that myriads of germs or
-disease-spreading organisms may be given off in the cutaneous
-exhalations, the excreta, and, possibly, the very breath of infected
-animals, it is no<span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</span> exaggeration to affirm that one such beast might
-decimate its neighbourhood, affecting alike the living cattle in the
-Pounds and Lairs waiting for slaughter, and the dead meat hanging up to
-cool in the Slaughter-house before it was carried away by the retail
-butchers. In the latter case, the well-known power of warm fat in
-rapidly absorbing all kinds of odours, good and bad, would render every
-precaution to prevent the contamination of the meat already killed
-inoperative.</p>
-
-<p>It is no argument against these measures to urge that their necessity
-has not yet been recognised by the unlearned, or to assert that no
-practical difficulty has arisen in the direction just mentioned,
-for it must be remembered that the great aim of all modern Sanitary
-legislation is to discover disease in its germinal condition, and apply
-such <em>preventive</em> agents as will combat the extension of the
-mischief when once discovered.</p>
-
-<p>Interested persons have asserted that no injury to health has been
-proved to result from the existence of Slaughter-houses, even in
-densely<span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</span> populated and confined situations, but my own experience, and
-that of every practical physician, leads to an opposite opinion; in
-support of which I may recall the circumstance of my having recently
-reported to you an outbreak of scarlet fever in the vicinity of
-the Slaughter-houses in Aldgate, and again as lately as 14th March
-last a case of typhoid fever in Somerset Street, at the back of the
-Slaughter-houses, in a house in immediate connexion with the drains of
-the Slaughter-houses and the “blood house” adjoining. Moreover, it is
-a truism, established by recent researches in vital statistics, that
-slaughterers and butchers should be regarded as an unhealthy class
-of men, since they present a much higher rate of mortality than is
-observed in other trades.</p>
-
-<p>It is now established as an actuarial fact,<span class="fnanchor" id="fna3"><a href="#fn3">[3]</a></span> that<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</span> this
-unhealthfulness of calling applies to all trades in connection
-with animal food, and this has been supposed to depend, in
-the case of butchers and slaughterers,&mdash;<em>Firstly</em>, from
-their constantly inhaling an atmosphere impregnated with animal
-matter;&mdash;<em>Secondly</em>, from their exposure to sudden alternations of
-temperature and the vicissitudes of weather; and,&mdash;<em>Thirdly</em>, from
-the large amount of animal food they are known to eat. It has also been
-stated with much force that they are necessarily exposed, more than
-other persons, to fevers and zymotic diseases, from their constantly
-breathing an atmosphere charged with decomposing, and often putrescent,
-animal matter.</p>
-
-<p>Respecting the separation of the Pounds from the Slaughter-houses,
-I still retain a strong conviction that such is both necessary and
-expedient, although I am not insensible of the difficulty of carrying
-it out in some few of the Slaughter-houses, whose cramped dimensions
-render this and other requisite accommodation well nigh impracticable.
-In these cases the owners should be compensated, and the places closed.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</span></p>
-
-<p>Before a clear idea can be entertained of the possible and impossible
-improvements in these Slaughter-houses, I strongly recommend that a
-ground plan<span class="fnanchor" id="fna4"><a href="#fn4">[4]</a></span> be prepared of the whole block in High Street, showing
-to scale the exact size of each Shop, Lair, Slaughter-house, and
-out-building, with so much of the surrounding property as will provide
-a back way into the Slaughter-houses upon a give-and-take line as
-between immediate neighbours; should the owners find it their interest
-to combine for such purpose.</p>
-
-<p>By means of this plan it may be seen how far it may be practicable
-to reconstruct the whole of these places upon one agreed basis, and
-prevent, <i lang="la" xml:lang="la">inter alia</i>, the objectionable practice of driving the
-cattle across the public footways into the Slaughter-houses, so much
-complained of.</p>
-
-
-<h3 id="bl6"><span class="smcap">Bye-law VI.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That the inner surface of the walls of every Slaughter-house be covered
-with slate, stone, or<span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</span> other hard, smooth, impervious material, to the
-height of 7 feet 6 inches, and that above this height to the roof the
-walls be cemented.</p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objection.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>The Butchers say, “It is a useless expense to extend the smooth,
-impervious material beyond four feet,” and that “there is no practical
-advantage in cementing the whole of the upper part of the walls of
-the Slaughter-house; on the contrary, the hard bricks are superior to
-cement, which will break off.”</i></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>The height of the “dado” was increased from 4 feet 6 inches to 7 feet 6
-inches, in consequence of my having inspected a Slaughter-house outside
-the City, and finding 4 feet 6 inches insufficient to protect the walls
-above from the splashing of blood and filth, the “dado” itself being
-clean.</p>
-
-<p>In Edinburgh the walls are formed of solid ashler stone to a height of
-<em>seven feet</em>.</p>
-
-<p>The advantage of covering the inner surfaces of the Slaughter-house
-walls with an impervious cement are twofold: <em>Firstly</em>, the walls
-can be much more easily washed and kept clean. <em>Secondly</em>, it
-obviates the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</span> liability of the walls becoming saturated with decaying
-nitrogenous matter by the constant absorption of moist animal vapours
-by porous bricks. [This precaution was suggested by a perusal of an
-account of the practical experiments of Professor Pettenkofer, of
-Munich, who has clearly demonstrated in various ways the extreme
-porosity of ordinary brick walls.] <em>Lastly</em>, a hard, smooth wall
-prevents the ingress and lodgment of vermin. The question of expense
-raised by the Butchers is hardly worthy of prosperous and wealthy
-tradesmen, and the objection that the cement would “break off” is too
-frivolous to answer.</p>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law VII.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That each Slaughter-house be provided with adequate lairage or
-poundage, separated from the slaughtering space by a closed partition,
-extending from the floor to the roof, formed of brick, stone, slate,
-or other similar material, having a smooth impervious surface, to a
-height of at least 7 feet 6 inches from the floor. That in all cases
-where from the present plan of the premises a door is needed between
-the Lair or Pound and the slaughtering<span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</span> space, such door be provided
-with spring hinges, and be kept closed when not open for the passage
-of cattle, but that where other means exist of taking cattle from the
-Lair or Pound into the Slaughter-house, without passing through shops,
-or over important public ways, no door shall exist between the Lair or
-Pound and the Slaughter-house.</p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objections.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>The contention here is that the separation of the Slaughter-houses
-from the Pound will impede ventilation, and that a partition six feet
-high is sufficient for the purpose, the Butchers denying that any
-“offensive effluvia arise from a live animal.” It is assumed that the
-reason for this Bye-law is based primarily upon the idea that the
-animals are distressed by seeing the process of slaughtering whilst
-waiting their turn for the pole-axe. It is further objected that the
-spring hinges are likely to lead to accidents to men and beasts.</i></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>The chief considerations in support of this Bye-law are given in the
-extract of my Report on 1st June, 1875, above quoted. I may, however,
-say, in addition, that the possibility of the animals waiting<span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</span> for
-slaughter seeing the process of killing other animals, formed no part
-of the argument.</p>
-
-<p>Again, the Butchers’ objection on the score of ventilation is based
-upon the supposition that the Pound must necessarily be of the
-same height as the Slaughter-house, which does not follow, as the
-accompanying Diagram will show:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center p0 p2"><span class="figcenter" id="img001">
- <img src="images/001.jpg" class="w75" alt="Diagram of slaughter-house" />
-</span></p>
-
-<p>The spring hinges ordered in this Bye-law will ensure the door between
-the Slaughter-house and Pound being kept closed, but the Butchers may,
-if<span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</span> they prefer it, hang the doors by balance weights, so as to slide
-up and down like an ordinary sash window, by which means the direful
-consequences predicted as likely to result from the use of spring
-hinges may be avoided.</p>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law VIII.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That where any Slaughter-house or Pound cannot be sufficiently
-ventilated by openings on to the public ways, or on to other open
-places, it shall be ventilated from the roof, which shall be so
-constructed as to admit freely of the escape of air, and that rings for
-burning gas be fixed in the roof so as to increase the upward current
-when a-light, and that both Slaughter-house and Pound be properly
-lighted either from the public ways or other open spaces, and where
-that be not practicable, then from the roof.</p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objections.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>The chief arguments relate to matters quite irrelevant, and are very
-confused and unintelligible. The only part of the “objection” belonging
-to this Bye-law is that which refers to the proposal for increasing
-the efficiency of the ventilation by rings of gas, which the Butchers
-characterise as “absurd.”</i></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</span></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>The question raised here is as to the proper mode of ventilation and
-lighting, and seeing that it would be worse than folly to perpetuate
-the evil of allowing an intercommunication between the side walls of
-some of the present ill-devised, and worse-kept, Slaughter-houses in
-Aldgate High Street, your Committee were driven to the alternative of
-requiring both light and ventilation to be sought for in the roof.</p>
-
-<p>The ring of gas spoken of so contemptuously by the Butchers will have
-the effect of rarefying the vitiated air in the Slaughter-houses during
-the process of slaughtering, and by producing an up-current, quicken
-the ventilation.</p>
-
-<p>Upon this point <abbr title="mister">Mr.</abbr> Darbyshire, before quoted, says, speaking of
-his work at Manchester, “the Slaughter-houses are well lighted from
-the roofs, top lights being superior to side lights for purposes of
-slaughtering.” All the Markets recently constructed by the Corporation
-of London are similarly lighted and ventilated, and at the Abattoir
-in Edinburgh the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</span> whole of the ventilation is carried on by large
-ventilators, and other contrivances, in the roof.</p>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law IX.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That each Slaughter-house and Pound be thoroughly washed over the
-entire surface of the walls to the height of 7 feet 6 inches, and
-over the whole surface of the floor directly after slaughtering is
-completed, or at least once in every twenty-four hours.</p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objections.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>The substance of the objections raised is that the requirements
-for washing are too stringent, with a reiteration of the grievance
-of a dado 7 feet 6 inches; also the Butchers find it “difficult to
-imagine why the walls and floor of the Pound, as well as those of the
-Slaughter-houses, are to be washed after slaughtering,” and seem to
-imagine that the washing is required every twenty-four hours, including
-Sundays, whether slaughtering is going on or not.</i></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>The provision for thoroughly cleansing, once in each twenty-four
-hours, Slaughter-houses and Pounds<span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</span> that are in constant use, is too
-obviously necessary to require any defence, and the quibble raised by
-the Butchers about Sunday cleaning is, I presume, intended as a joke.</p>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law X.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That the internal surface of the roofs and upper portions of the
-wall of the Slaughter-houses and Pounds above the 7 feet 6 inches of
-impermeable surface be washed with quicklime at least once every month.</p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objections.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>That the requirements for the limewhiting are excessive, and that,
-if insisted upon, would be “oppressive and useless.”</i></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>I am of opinion that this Bye-law may be relaxed, and that it
-will suffice if the <em>monthly</em> limewhiting be required in the
-<em>summer</em> only, say from May to October; and once in <em>three</em>
-months in the colder seasons, say November to April. The necessity for
-this periodical cleansing with lime would be made<span class="pagenum" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</span> abundantly clear
-if the Local Government Board would send one of their own Medical
-Inspectors to see the places as now existing; who would be astonished,
-as your Committee were, to observe the foul, black, sooty, and greasy
-state of all that is left of the ruins of the timbers originally
-forming the roofs of some of the Slaughter-houses in Aldgate, and
-perhaps concur in remarks freely expressed by outsiders, that no
-regulations can be too stringent for the management of a business,
-which under the most careful supervision and with every intelligent
-precaution, is repulsive and offensive to the senses.</p>
-
-<p>Assuming that the observance of the proposed Bye-laws will unavoidably
-compel a partial reconstruction of the Slaughter-houses in Aldgate,
-and substantial repairs in the adjacent structures, the washing
-with quicklime was ordered with a view of providing a suitable and
-inexpensive coating for the new wood-work of the roofs, &amp;c., for, owing
-to the constant presence of Sulphuretted Hydrogen in Slaughter-houses,
-paint is inadmissible from the circumstance that it would speedily
-be turned black by the action of such gas upon any mineral pigment<span class="pagenum" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</span>
-employed. The limewhiting if used <em>hot</em> would act as a powerful
-disinfectant and deodoriser, as well as having the effect of greatly
-reflecting the light in the Slaughter-house, and giving the place a
-cool and clean appearance.</p>
-
-<p>The Metropolitan Board of Works in their 6th Bye-law require that “the
-occupier shall keep the inner walls of every Slaughter-house always
-<em>thoroughly clean</em> and in <em>good order and repair</em>, and shall
-cause the internal surface of the <em>roof</em> and <em>upper portions of
-the walls</em> to be thoroughly washed with quicklime <em>at least</em>
-once in <em>every three months</em>.”</p>
-
-<p>The Butchers have probably overlooked this Bye-law in quoting the
-action of the Metropolitan Board of Works.</p>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law XV.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That no Slaughter-house or Pound be used for any purpose other than
-that for which it is licensed, and that no slaughtering be conducted
-within public view.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</span></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objection.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>The Butchers maintain that the Pound is not included in the Licence
-for the Slaughter-house.</i></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>It is quite true that the word <em>Pound</em> is not used in the Licence
-for a Slaughter-house, but the Act of Parliament, 1874, distinctly
-provides that the Bye-laws shall extend to the “<em>premises</em>”
-generally.</p>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law XVIII.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That in case of any diseased or unsound cattle being brought to a
-Slaughter-house, Pound, or Lair, the occupier shall forthwith give
-information thereof to the Medical Officer of Health of the City of
-London.</p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objection.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>That the retention of the word unsound might involve the Butchers in
-a charge of Slaughtering Diseased Meat.</i></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</span></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>I should not insist upon the retention of the word “<em>unsound</em>” if
-some guarantee could be exacted that the animal would be slaughtered
-within a specified time of the occurrence of any accident which might
-disable it; although it must be remembered that the flesh of a beast
-suffering pain, or deprived of the full use of all its functions,
-rapidly deteriorates in quality and nutrient properties.</p>
-
-
-<h3><span class="smcap">Bye-law XXI.</span></h3>
-
-<p>That every person occupying a Slaughter-house shall cause the works
-needful for complying with these Bye-laws to be forthwith executed,
-and when completed shall not permit any alteration to be made in them
-without the sanction of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of
-London, and that the whole of the works and regulations be carried out
-to the approval of the Medical Officer of Health.</p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Objection.</span></h4>
-
-<p><i>That the Medical Officer of Health should not be the judge of the
-mode in which the works ordered by the Bye-laws are executed.</i></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</span></p>
-
-
-<h4><span class="smcap">Reply.</span></h4>
-
-<p>This Bye-law provides a salutary check upon the active resistance the
-Butchers seem ever ready to offer to rules intended for their own
-benefit, no less than the protection of the public health, and the
-general arrangements and discipline of a Slaughter-house belonging
-exclusively to the Sanitary Department, your Committee thought it would
-save circumlocution if the Medical Officer of Health was made amenable
-to the Court of Sewers for the due maintenance of the Bye-laws in their
-integrity.</p>
-
-<p>So far, however, as I am concerned I shall be very thankful to be
-relieved from the odious duty of enforcing regulations which are so
-ungraciously acquiesced in by the persons on whose behoof they are
-made, at the same time I shall never shrink from accepting whatever
-responsibility may be connected with my office.</p>
-
-<p>It is quite untrue, as stated by the Butchers’ Trade Society, “that
-the Bye-laws in question have been framed by persons totally without
-practical<span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</span> acquaintance with the trade,” the fact being, that they were
-prepared with the active assistance of several Members of the Committee
-of great experience as providitors, two of whom are large carcass
-butchers, and two others are extensively connected, commercially and
-officially, with the butchering interests, and well informed upon the
-economy of Markets and Slaughter-houses. Again, the Committee was
-attended at each of its sittings by the Deputy of the Ward in which
-the Slaughter-houses are situated, who was specially invited to attend
-upon each occasion, and who generously and frankly avowed himself the
-advocate of the slaughterers. This gentleman took part in all the
-discussions, and argued forcibly and fully every point in connexion
-with the subject; but beyond this, your Committee’s Report was further
-analysed and criticised by the General Court of Sewers, amongst whom
-were many Commissioners practically and intimately acquainted with
-the whole bearings and requirement of the question. As you are aware,
-the Court adopted your Report, without amendment or alteration, being
-satisfied of the wisdom and expediency of the Bye-laws compiled by you.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</span></p>
-
-<p>The remarks of the “Butchers’ Trade Society” relative to the Report
-being passed by the Court of Sewers with “closed doors” require one
-word of explanation: The exclusion of strangers at the time the Report
-was presented was not dictated by any desire to conceal the purport of
-its contents, and indeed had nothing to do with the main question of
-its adoption, but was resolved simply in order that the Solicitor might
-read a confidential communication having reference only to a technical
-legal proposition as to the mode of enforcing the said Bye-laws should
-they be sanctioned by the Local Government Board.</p>
-
-<p>In conclusion, I will only add that, having given my best attention to
-the whole subject, and carefully considered the not very formidable
-“objections” raised by the butchers, I have arrived at the honest
-conviction that no substantial grounds are therein advanced which
-would justify you, as the Sanitary Authority in the City of London, in
-varying the requirements of the Bye-laws submitted for approval to the
-Local Government Board, beyond the concessions herein described.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</span></p>
-
-<p>Adverting to my individual action in the matter, I may here repeat
-that I am quite unconscious of the smallest desire to limit the
-usefulness or cripple the operations of an important and valuable
-trade, and that I have endeavoured to reconcile the desires of the
-occupiers of the Slaughter-houses with the imperative requirements of
-the public health; nevertheless, I cannot help sharing the conviction
-of all competent Sanitarians, that the perpetuation of densely packed
-Slaughter-houses in the midst of a close population, where the
-introduction of a sufficient supply of light, air, and ventilation, is
-physically impossible, was a lamentable error of legislation, which
-every unprejudiced observer admits will, and <em>must</em>, be remedied,
-whenever the exigencies of public health are allowed to outweigh the
-antagonism of interested and uncompromising opposition.</p>
-
-<p>I feel it necessary to say as much as this, since I have been credited
-with more than my share in the preparation of the materials upon
-which you have deemed it wise and expedient to frame these<span class="pagenum" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</span> Bye-laws,
-an impression which has involved me in no small amount of abuse and
-obloquy.</p>
-
-<p class="right p0">
-<span style="margin-right: 1em;">I have the honour to be,</span><br />
-<span style="margin-right: 1.5em;"><span class="smcap">Gentlemen</span>,</span><br />
-<span style="margin-right: 1em;">Your obedient Servant,</span><br />
-<br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">WM. SEDGWICK SAUNDERS, M.D.,</span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;"><i>Medical Officer of Health</i>.</span></p>
-<p class="p0">
-<span class="smcap">Guildhall</span>,<br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;"><i>27th June, 1876</i>.</span><br />
-</p>
-
-
-<div class="footnotes p2"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
-
-<p class="footnote" id="fn2"><a href="#fna2">[2]</a> The “objections” are quoted in abstract only, in order to save
-space, but the sense of the same has been scrupulously observed.</p>
-
-<p class="footnote" id="fn3"><a href="#fna3">[3]</a> In a paper on the “Influence of Occupation upon Health,” read by
-<abbr title="mister">Mr.</abbr> F. G. P. Neilson, F.S.S., before the Institute of Actuaries, and
-published in their Journal, July, 1872, it is shewn that in the forty
-years of age, 25 to 65, the mortality of butchers is 17·9 per thousand
-living, and that of poulterers 21·0, as against 10·6 of gardeners,
-12·4 carpenters, 13·4 shoemakers, 16·8 stonemasons, &amp;c. The results
-were obtained by a comparison of the whole of the mortality of England
-and Wales, 1860-1, with 1,147,243 years of life of members of Friendly
-Societies.</p>
-
-<p class="footnote" id="fn4"><a href="#fna4">[4]</a> This has since been done, and a copy sent to the Local Government
-Board.</p>
-</div>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="POSTSCRIPT">POSTSCRIPT.</h2>
-</div>
-
-
-<p>Since the foregoing was written I have received copies of additional
-documents forwarded by the “Butchers’ Trade Society” to the Local
-Government Board, and, in accordance with your request, have perused
-and considered the same.</p>
-
-<p>These communications begin with a long letter from the above named
-Society, consisting of extracts from my Report on Slaughter-houses,
-dated 1st June,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</span> 1875, with observations upon the same, given point by
-point in parallel columns.</p>
-
-<p>These remarks are really little more than a “<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">réchauffé</i>” of
-those already set forth in the voluminous epistle of the Society,
-dated 10th April, 1876, addressed to the Local Government Board, and I
-fail to recognise any more important differences than the following,
-viz., some very ungracious and totally irrelevant reflections upon the
-conduct of the District Sanitary Inspectors, for the forbearance shown
-by those officers in allowing the greatest latitude as to the defects
-and nuisances observed in the butchers’ premises to continue with as
-little interference as possible until the new <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">régime</i> could
-be established; also a statement that your Engineer is at variance
-with myself in the recommendations given to your Committee, the truth
-being that they were prepared by that officer in conjunction with your
-Solicitor and myself. Further, the Society inform the Local Government
-Board, that disease germs have never been known to rise to a height
-of six feet, and that therefore the side walls separating adjoining
-Slaughter-houses need not be<span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</span> built as high as the Bye-laws require!
-This is a fair sample of the recklessness with which the “Butchers’
-Trade Society’s” last production has been framed, and pays a poor
-compliment to the discrimination of the Local Government Board, who
-may, if they think fit, educate the Society to the fact that disease
-germs have been known to travel many thousands of miles, carrying with
-them cholera and kindred diseases from the far East to the distant
-West;&mdash;a corresponding degree of ignorance characterises the dicta
-of the butchers upon the physical laws which govern the movements of
-currents of air, and which for convenience is called ventilation.
-Again, the Society claim an exceptional state of salubrity and freedom
-from disease for butchers as a class&mdash;a proposition which I have
-already shown you is untenable. Further information may be obtained
-upon this subject from a Report written by <abbr title="doctor">Dr.</abbr> Buchanan, one of the
-Medical Inspectors of the Local Government Board, upon the connection
-between scarlet fever and cow sheds, in a district under his charge.
-Lastly, the Society ask, whether in my judgment the butchers would be
-less unhealthy in the Slaughter-houses as arranged<span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</span> according to my
-plan, and I answer broadly and unhesitatingly, Yes.</p>
-
-<p>The remaining letters comprise one from the Reverend the Vicar of
-St. Botolph, whose testimony as to the general condition of the
-Slaughter-houses is opposed to the evidence of your own senses when
-visiting the places, and is otherwise grossly inaccurate; also
-letters from two resident medical practitioners certifying as to
-the healthiness of the neighbourhood of Aldgate in general, and
-the Slaughter-houses in particular&mdash;also a detailed Report from a
-Metropolitan Medical Officer of Health, who has so implicitly adopted
-every “objection” made by the butchers to your Bye-laws, that I am
-irresistibly forced to the conclusion that he is either the author of
-such “objections,” or has lent a too credent ear to the gentleman he
-mentions as having accompanied him in his survey, and “who gave him
-much valuable information, statistical and otherwise.” Upon fairly
-balancing the whole matter, I cannot see any reason to modify the
-opinions expressed in my Report of 27th June last, and in apportioning
-the value to be awarded to the conflicting testimony offered to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</span> you,
-I must ask you to remember that the strenuous efforts in the way of
-resistance made by the butchers, and my own justification of the
-principles of right and propriety, which have alone dictated my advice,
-rest upon totally distinct bases.</p>
-
-<p class="right p0">
-<span style="margin-right: 1em;">W. S. S.</span></p>
-<p class="p0">
-<span class="smcap">Guildhall</span>,<br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;"><i>14th July, 1876</i>.</span><br />
-</p>
-
-<hr class="r65" />
-<p class="p4 center p0">CHARLES SKIPPER AND EAST, PRINTERS, ST. DUNSTAN’S HILL, E.C.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p class="center p0 p2"><span class="figcenter" id="img002">
- <img src="images/002.jpg" class="w75" alt="PLAN of SLAUGHTER-HOUSES in the CITY of LONDON" />
-</span></p>
-
-<div class="caption">
-
-<p class="center p0"><span class="smcap">PLAN of SLAUGHTER-HOUSES in the CITY of LONDON.</span></p>
-<p class="center p0">NOTE</p>
-<p class="center p0"><i>The</i> Light Red Tint, <i>shews buildings principally constructed
-of Brick</i>.</p>
-
-<p class="center p0"><i>The</i> Red Tint, <i>shews Buildings constructed of Brick, and
-Inhabited</i>.</p>
-
-<p class="center p0"><i>The</i> Yellow Tint, <i>shews buildings principally constructed of
-Wood</i>.</p>
-</div>
-</div>
-<p class="center p0">
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;"><i>William Haywood</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;"><i>July 1876</i></span><br />
-</p>
-
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter transnote">
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="Transcribers_Notes">Transcriber’s Notes</h2>
-
-
-<p>In a few cases, minor errors in punctuation have been fixed.</p>
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin-top:4em'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK REPORT OF THE SANITARY COMMITTEE OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF SEWERS OF THE CITY OF LONDON, TOGETHER WITH A REPORT OF THE MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH ON THE OBJECTIONS RAISED BY THE BUTCHERS' TRADE SOCIETY TO THE BYE-LAWS PROPOSED FOR THE REGULATION OF SLAUGHTER-HOUSES ***</div>
-<div style='text-align:left'>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Updated editions will replace the previous one&#8212;the old editions will
-be renamed.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG&#8482;
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away&#8212;you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-</div>
-
-<div style='margin:0.83em 0; font-size:1.1em; text-align:center'>START: FULL LICENSE<br />
-<span style='font-size:smaller'>THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE<br />
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK</span>
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-To protect the Project Gutenberg&#8482; mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase &#8220;Project
-Gutenberg&#8221;), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
-or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.B. &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (&#8220;the
-Foundation&#8221; or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg&#8482; mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg&#8482; work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg&#8482; work (any work
-on which the phrase &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; appears, or with which the
-phrase &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-</div>
-
-<blockquote>
- <div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
- other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
- whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
- of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
- at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you
- are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
- of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
- </div>
-</blockquote>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase &#8220;Project
-Gutenberg&#8221; associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg&#8482; License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg&#8482;.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; License.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg&#8482; work in a format
-other than &#8220;Plain Vanilla ASCII&#8221; or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg&#8482; website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original &#8220;Plain
-Vanilla ASCII&#8221; or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg&#8482; works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-provided that:
-</div>
-
-<div style='margin-left:0.7em;'>
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg&#8482; works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg&#8482; trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, &#8220;Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation.&#8221;
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg&#8482;
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
- works.
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg&#8482; works.
- </div>
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg&#8482; trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain &#8220;Defects,&#8221; such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the &#8220;Right
-of Replacement or Refund&#8221; described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you &#8216;AS-IS&#8217;, WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg&#8482; work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg&#8482; work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg&#8482;&#8217;s
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg&#8482; collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg&#8482; and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation&#8217;s EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state&#8217;s laws.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Foundation&#8217;s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation&#8217;s website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
-public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
-visit <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/donate/">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a>.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg&#8482; eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg&#8482;,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-</div>
-
-</div>
-</body>
-</html>
diff --git a/old/67634-h/images/001.jpg b/old/67634-h/images/001.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index d1682b5..0000000
--- a/old/67634-h/images/001.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/67634-h/images/002.jpg b/old/67634-h/images/002.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 3b6f12f..0000000
--- a/old/67634-h/images/002.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/67634-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/67634-h/images/cover.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 13b850f..0000000
--- a/old/67634-h/images/cover.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ