diff options
| author | nfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org> | 2025-01-22 17:43:44 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | nfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org> | 2025-01-22 17:43:44 -0800 |
| commit | 527fb4b219ef159520db86abe83a8a7c92dadab2 (patch) | |
| tree | 411edda74c0056d7ab49fe4240000d321742c13e | |
| parent | 1ee2815676aed4308ab49a43fd41a2310e5229bd (diff) | |
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/66225-0.txt | 1181 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/66225-0.zip | bin | 24094 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/66225-h.zip | bin | 322199 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/66225-h/66225-h.htm | 2034 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/66225-h/images/cover.jpg | bin | 259401 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/66225-h/images/i_001.png | bin | 38267 -> 0 bytes |
9 files changed, 17 insertions, 3215 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d7b82bc --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +*.txt text eol=lf +*.htm text eol=lf +*.html text eol=lf +*.md text eol=lf diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e98a924 --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #66225 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/66225) diff --git a/old/66225-0.txt b/old/66225-0.txt deleted file mode 100644 index 001f590..0000000 --- a/old/66225-0.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1181 +0,0 @@ -The Project Gutenberg eBook of Icarus, by Bertrand Russell - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and -most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions -whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms -of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at -www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you -will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before -using this eBook. - -Title: Icarus - or, The Future of Science - -Author: Bertrand Russell - -Release Date: September 5, 2021 [eBook #66225] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: UTF-8 - -Produced by: Tim Lindell, Charlie Howard, and the Online Distributed - Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was - produced from images generously made available by The Internet - Archive/American Libraries.) - -*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ICARUS *** - - - - -ICARUS - -OR - -THE FUTURE OF SCIENCE - - - - -BY THE SAME AUTHOR - -The A.B.C. OF ATOMS - -12mo., cloth $2.00 - - -In the last few years the study of Radioactivity has brought about -amazing advances in our knowledge of the properties and nature of the -Atom; and into this fascinating wonderland of the infinitely small -yet infinitely complex and infinitely full of energy, Mr. Russell -introduces us. - - - E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY - 681 Fifth Avenue, New York - - - - - ICARUS - - OR - - The Future of Science - - BY - BERTRAND RUSSELL - - - [Illustration] - - - NEW YORK - E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY - 681 FIFTH AVENUE - - - - - Copyright, 1924 - By E. P. Dutton & Company - - _All Rights Reserved_ - - First printing, April, 1924 - Second printing, June, 1924 - Third printing, October, 1924 - Fourth printing, December, 1924 - Fifth Printing, December, 1924 - Sixth Printing, June, 1925 - Seventh Printing, June, 1925 - - - Printed in the United States of America - - - -CONTENTS - - - PAGE - I. Introductory 5 - II. Effects of the Physical Sciences 15 - III. The Increase of Organization 23 - IV. The Anthropological Sciences 43 - Conclusion 57 - - - - -ICARUS - -OR - -THE FUTURE OF SCIENCE - - - - -I. INTRODUCTORY - - -Mr. Haldane’s _Daedalus_ has set forth an attractive picture of the -future as it may become through the use of scientific discoveries -to promote human happiness. Much as I should like to agree with his -forecast, a long experience of statesmen and governments has made -me somewhat sceptical. I am compelled to fear that science will be -used to promote the power of dominant groups, rather than to make men -happy. Icarus, having been taught to fly by his father Daedalus, was -destroyed by his rashness. I fear that the same fate may overtake the -populations whom modern men of science have taught to fly. Some of the -dangers inherent in the progress of science while we retain our present -political and economic institutions are set forth in the following -pages. - -This subject is so vast that it is impossible, within a limited space, -to do more than outline some of its aspects. The world in which we live -differs profoundly from that of Queen Anne’s time, and this difference -is mainly attributable to science. That is to say, the difference would -be very much less than it is but for various scientific discoveries, -but resulted from those discoveries by the operation of ordinary human -nature. The changes that have been brought about have been partly -good, partly bad; whether, in the end, science will prove to have been -a blessing or a curse to mankind, is to my mind, still a doubtful -question. - -A science may affect human life in two different ways. On the one -hand, without altering men’s passions or their general outlook, it may -increase their power of gratifying their desires. On the other hand, -it may operate through an effect upon the imaginative conception of -the world, the theology or philosophy which is accepted in practice by -energetic men. The latter is a fascinating study, but I shall almost -wholly ignore it, in order to bring my subject within a manageable -compass. I shall confine myself almost wholly to the effect of science -in enabling us to gratify our passions more freely, which has hitherto -been far the more important of the two. - -From our point of view, we may divide the sciences into three groups: -physical, biological, and anthropological. In the physical group I -include chemistry, and broadly speaking any science concerned with the -properties of matter apart from life. In the anthropological group I -include all studies specially concerned with man: human physiology and -psychology (between which no sharp line can be drawn), anthropology, -history, sociology, and economics. All these studies can be illuminated -by considerations drawn from biology; for instance, Rivers threw a new -light on parts of economics by adducing facts about landed property -among birds during the breeding season. But in spite of their -connection with biology--a connection which is likely to grow closer -as time goes on--they are broadly distinguished from biology by their -methods and data, and deserve to be grouped apart, at any rate in a -sociological inquiry. - -The effect of the biological sciences, so far, has been very small. No -doubt Darwinism and the idea of evolution affected men’s imaginative -outlook; arguments were derived in favour of free competition, and -also of nationalism. But these effects were of the sort that I propose -not to consider. It is probable that great effects will come from -these sciences sooner or later. Mendelism might have revolutionized -agriculture, and no doubt some similar theory will do so sooner -or later. Bacteriology may enable us to exterminate our enemies by -disease. The study of heredity may in time make eugenics an exact -science, and perhaps we shall in a later age be able to determine at -will the sex of our children. This would probably lead to an excess -of males, involving a complete change in family institutions. But -these speculations belong to the future. I do not propose to deal with -the possible future effects of biology, both because my knowledge of -biology is very limited, and because the subject has been admirably -treated by Mr. Haldane.[1] - - [1] See his _Daedalus, or Science and the Future_. - -The anthropological sciences are those from which, _a priori_, we might -have expected the greatest social effects, but hitherto this has not -proved to be the case, partly because these sciences are mostly still -at an early stage of development. Even economics has not so far had -much effect. Where it has seemed to have, this is because it advocated -what was independently desired. Hitherto, the most effective of the -anthropological sciences has been medicine, through its influence -on sanitation and public health, and through the fact that it has -discovered how to deal with malaria and yellow fever. Birth-control is -also a very important social fact which comes into this category. But -although the future effect of the anthropological sciences (to which I -shall return presently) is illimitable, the effect up to the present -has been confined within fairly narrow limits. - -One general observation to begin with. Science has increased man’s -control over nature, and might therefore be supposed likely to increase -his happiness and well-being. This would be the case if men were -rational, but in fact they are bundles of passions and instincts. -An animal species in a stable environment, if it does not die out, -acquires an equilibrium between its passions and the conditions of -its life. If the conditions are suddenly altered, the equilibrium is -upset. Wolves in a state of nature have difficulty in getting food, and -therefore need the stimulus of a very insistent hunger. The result is -that their descendants, domestic dogs, over-eat if they are allowed to -do so. When a certain amount of something is useful, and the difficulty -of obtaining it is diminished, instinct will usually lead an animal to -excess in the new circumstances. The sudden change produced by science -has upset the balance between our instincts and our circumstances, but -in directions not sufficiently noticed. Over-eating is not a serious -danger, but over-fighting is. The human instincts of power and rivalry, -like the dog’s wolfish appetite will need to be artificially curbed, if -industrialism is to succeed. - - - - -II. EFFECTS OF THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES - - -Much the greatest part of the changes which science has made in social -life is due to the physical sciences, as is evident when we consider -that they brought about the industrial revolution. This is a trite -topic, about which I shall say as little as my subject permits. There -are, however, some points which must be made. - -First, industrialism, still has great parts of the earth’s surface to -conquer. Russia and India are very imperfectly industrialized; China -hardly at all. In South America there is room for immense development. -One of the effects of industrialism is to make the world an economic -unit: its ultimate consequences will be very largely due to this -fact. But before the world can be effectively organized as a unit, it -will probably be necessary to develop industrially all the regions -capable of development that are at present backward. The effects of -industrialism change as it becomes more wide-spread; this must be -remembered in any attempt to argue from its past to its future. - -The second point about industrialism is that it increases the -productivity of labour, and thus makes more luxuries possible. At -first, in England, the chief luxury achieved was a larger population -with an actual lowering of the standard of life. Then came a golden age -when wages increased, hours of labour diminished, and simultaneously -the middle-class grew more prosperous. That was while Great Britain -was still supreme. With the growth of foreign industrialism, a new -epoch began. Industrial organizations have seldom succeeded in becoming -world-wide, and have consequently become national. Competition, -formerly between individual firms, is now mainly between nations, -and is therefore conducted by methods quite different from those -contemplated by the classical economists. - -Modern industrialism is a struggle between nations for two things, -markets and raw materials, as well as for the sheer pleasure of -dominion. The labour which is set free from providing the necessaries -of life tends to be more and more absorbed by national rivalry. -There are first the armed forces of the State; then those who -provide munitions of war, from the raw minerals up to the finished -product; then the diplomatic and consular services; then the teachers -of patriotism in schools; then the Press. All of these perform -other functions as well, but the chief purpose is to minister to -international competition. As another class whose labours are devoted -to the same end, we must add a considerable proportion of the men -of science. These men invent continually more elaborate methods of -attack and defence. The net result of their labours is to diminish the -proportion of the population that can be put into the fighting line, -since more are required for munitions. This might seem a boon, but in -fact war is now-a-days primarily against the civilian population, and -in a defeated country they are liable to suffer just as much as the -soldiers. - -It is science above all that has determined the importance of raw -materials in international competition. Coal and iron and oil, -especially, are the bases of power, and thence of wealth. The nation -which possesses them, and has the industrial skill required to utilize -them in war, can acquire markets by armed force, and levy tribute -upon less fortunate nations. Economists have underestimated the part -played by military prowess in the acquisition of wealth. The landed -aristocracies of Europe were, in origin, warlike invaders. Their defeat -by the bourgeoisie in the French Revolution, and the fear which this -generated in the Duke of Wellington, facilitated the rise of the middle -class. The wars of the eighteenth century decided that England was -to be richer than France. The traditional economist’s rules for the -distribution of wealth hold only when men’s actions are governed by -law, i.e. when most people think the issue unimportant. The issues that -people have considered vital have been decided by civil wars or wars -between nations. And for the present, owing to science, the art of -war consists in possessing coal, iron, oil, and the industrial skill -to work them. For the sake of simplicity, I omit other raw materials, -since they do not affect the essence of our problem. - -We may say, therefore, speaking very generally, that men have used -the increased productivity which they owe to science for three chief -purposes in succession: first, to increase the population; then, to -raise the standard of comfort; and, finally, to provide more energy to -war. This last result has been chiefly brought about by competition for -markets, which led to competition for raw materials, especially the raw -materials of munitions. - - - - -III. THE INCREASE OF ORGANIZATION - - -The stimulation of nationalism which has taken place in modern times -is, however, due very largely to another factor, namely the increase -of organization, which is of the very essence of industrialism. -Wherever expensive fixed capital is required, organization on a large -scale is of course necessary. In view of the economies of large scale -production, organization in marketing also becomes of great importance. -For some purposes, if not for all, many industries come to be organized -nationally, so as to be in effect one business in each nation. - -Science has not only brought about the need of large organizations, -but also the technical possibility of their existence. Without -railways, telegraphs, and telephones, control from a centre is very -difficult. In ancient empires, and in China down to modern times, -provinces were governed by practically independent satraps or -proconsuls, who were appointed by the central government, but decided -almost all questions on their own initiative. If they displeased the -sovereign, they could only be controlled by civil war, of which the -issue was doubtful. Until the invention of the telegraph, ambassadors -had a great measure of independence, since it was often necessary to -act without waiting for orders from home. What applied in politics -applied also in business: an organization controlled from the -centre had to be very loosely knit, and to allow much autonomy to -subordinates. Opinion as well as action was difficult to mould from a -centre, and local variations marred the uniformity of party creeds. - -Now-a-days all this is changed. Telegraph, telephone, and wireless make -it easy to transmit orders from a centre: railways and steamers make -it easy to transport troops in case the orders are disobeyed. Modern -methods of printing and advertising make it enormously cheaper to -produce and distribute one newspaper with a large circulation than many -with small circulations; consequently, in so far as the Press controls -opinion, there is uniformity, and, in particular, there is uniformity -of news. Elementary education, except in so far as religious -denominations introduce variety, is conducted on a uniform pattern -decided by the State, by means of teachers whom the State has trained, -as far as possible, to imitate the regularity and mutual similarity -of machines produced to standard. Thus the material and psychological -conditions for a great intensity of organization have increased _pari -passu_, but the basis of the whole development is scientific invention -in the purely physical realm. Increased productivity has played its -part, by making it possible to set apart more labour for propaganda, -under which head are to be included advertisement, the cinema, the -Press, education, politics, and religion. Broadcasting is a new method -likely to acquire great potency as soon as people are satisfied that -it is _not_ a method of propaganda. - -Political controversies, as Mr. Graham Wallas has pointed out, ought -to be conducted in quantitative terms. If sociology were one of the -sciences that had affected social institutions (which it is not), this -would be the case. The dispute between anarchism and bureaucracy at -present tends to take the form of one side maintaining that we want -no organization, while the other maintains that we want as much as -possible. A person imbued with the scientific spirit would hardly even -examine these extreme positions. Some people think that we keep our -rooms too hot for health, others that we keep them too cold. If this -were a political question, one party would maintain that the best -temperature is the absolute zero, the other that it is the melting -point of iron. Those who maintained any intermediate position would be -abused as timorous time-servers, concealed agents of the other side, -men who ruined the enthusiasm of a sacred cause by tepid appeals to -mere reason. Any man who had the courage to say that our rooms ought to -be neither very hot nor very cold would be abused by both parties, and -probably shot in No Man’s Land. Possibly some day politics may become -more rational, but so far there is not the faintest indication of a -change in this direction. - -To a rational mind, the question is not: Do we want organization or do -we not? The question is: How much organization do we want, and where -and when and of what kind? In spite of a temperamental leaning to -anarchism, I am persuaded that an industrial world cannot maintain -itself against internal disruptive forces without a great deal -more organization than we have at present. It is not the amount of -organization, but its kind and its purposes, that cause our troubles. -But before tackling this question, let us pause for a moment to ask -ourselves what is the measure of the intensity of organization in a -given community. - -A man’s acts are partly determined by spontaneous impulse, partly by -the conscious or unconscious effects of the various groups to which he -belongs. A man who works (say) on a railway or in a mine is, in his -working-hours almost entirely determined in his actions by those who -direct the collective labour of which he forms part. If he decides -to strike, his action is again not individual, but determined by his -Union. When he votes for Parliament, party caucuses have limited his -choice to one of two or three men, and party propaganda has induced -him to accept _in toto_ one of the two or three blocks of opinions -which form the rival party programmes. His choice between the parties -may be individual, but it may also be determined by the action of -some group, such as a trade union, which collectively supports one -party. His newspaper-reading exposes him to great organized forces; so -does the cinema, if he goes to it. His choice of a wife is probably -spontaneous, except that he must choose a woman of his own class. But -in the education of his children he is almost entirely powerless: they -must have the education which is provided. Organization thus determines -many vital things in his life. Compare him with a handicraftsman or -peasant-proprietor who cannot read and does not have his children -educated, and it becomes clear what is meant by saying that -industrialism has increased the intensity of organization. To define -this term, we must, I think, exclude the unconscious effects of groups, -except as causes facilitating the conscious effects. We may define the -intensity of organization to which a given individual is subject as -the proportion of his acts which is determined by the orders or advice -of some group, expressed through democratic decisions or executive -officers. The intensity of organization in a community may then be -defined as the average intensity for its several members. - -The intensity of organization is increased not only when a man belongs -to more organizations, but also when the organizations to which he -already belongs play a larger part in his life, as, for example, the -State plays a larger part in war than in peace. - -Another matter which needs to be treated quantitatively is the -degree of democracy, oligarchy, or monarchy in an organization. No -organization belongs completely to any one of the three types. There -must be executive officers, who will often in practice be able to -decide policy, even if in theory they cannot do so. And even if their -power depends upon persuasion, they may so completely control the -relevant publicity that they can always rely upon a majority. The -directors of a railway company, for instance, are to all intents and -purposes uncontrolled by the shareholders, who have no adequate means -of organizing an opposition if they should wish to do so. In America, -a railroad president is almost a monarch. In party politics, the power -of leaders, although it depends upon persuasion, continually increases -as printed propaganda becomes more important. For these reasons, even -where formal democracy increases, the real degree of democratic control -tends to diminish, except on a few questions which rouse strong popular -passions. - -The result of these causes is that, in consequence of scientific -inventions which facilitate centralization and propaganda, groups -become more organized, more disciplined, more group-conscious, -and more docile to leaders. The effect of leaders on followers is -increased, and the control of events by a few prominent personalities -becomes more marked. - -In all this there would be nothing very tragic, but for the fact, with -which science has nothing to do, that organization is almost wholly -national. If men were actuated by the love of gain, as the older -economists supposed, this would not be the case; the same causes which -have led to national trusts would have led to international trusts. -This has happened in a few instances, but not on a sufficiently wide -scale to affect politics or economics very vitally. Rivalry is, with -most well-to-do energetic people, a stronger motive than love of money. -Successful rivalry requires organization of rival forces; the tendency -is for a business such as oil, for example, to organize itself into two -rival groups, between them covering the world. They might, of course, -combine, and they would no doubt increase their wealth if they did -so. But combination would take the zest out of life. The object of a -football team, one might say, is to kick goals. If two rival teams -combined, and kicked the ball alternately over the two goals, many more -goals would be scored. Nevertheless no one suggests that this should -be done, the object of a football team being not to kick goals but -to win. So the object of a big business is not to make money, but to -win in the contest with some other business. If there were no other -business to be defeated, the whole thing would become uninteresting. -This rivalry has attached itself to nationalism, and enlisted the -support of the ordinary citizens of the countries concerned; they -seldom know what it is that they are supporting, but, like the -spectators at a football-match, they grow enthusiastic for their own -side. The harm that is being done by science and industrialism is -almost wholly due to the fact that, while they have proved strong -enough to produce a _national_ organization of economic forces, they -have not proved strong enough to produce an international organization. -It is clear that political internationalism such as the League of -Nations was supposed to inaugurate, will never be successful until we -have economic internationalism, which would require, as a minimum, an -agreement between various national organizations dividing among them -the raw materials and markets of the world. This, however, can hardly -be brought about while big business is controlled by men who are so -rich as to have grown indifferent to money, and to be willing to risk -enormous losses for the pleasure of rivalry. - -The increase of organization in the modern world has made the ideals -of liberalism wholly inapplicable. Liberalism, from Montesquieu to -President Wilson, was based upon the assumption of a number of more or -less equal individuals or groups, with no differences so vital that -they were willing to die sooner than compromise. It was supposed that -there was to be free competition between individuals and between ideas. -Experience has shown, however, that the existing economic system is -incompatible with all forms of free competition except between States -by means of armaments. I should wish, for my part, to preserve free -competition between ideas, though not between individuals and groups, -but this is only possible by means of what an old-fashioned liberal -would regard as interferences with personal liberty. So long as the -sources of economic power remain in private hands, there will be no -liberty except for the few who control those sources. - -Such liberal ideals as free trade, free press, unbiased education, -either already belong to the past or soon will do so. One of the -triumphs of early liberalism in England was the establishment of -parliamentary control over the army; this was the _casus belli_ in the -Civil War, and was decided by the Revolution of 1688. It was effective -so long as Parliament represented the same class from which army -officers were drawn. This was still the case with the late Parliament, -but may cease to be the case with the advent of a Labour Government. -Russia, Hungary, Italy, Spain, and Bavaria have shown in recent years -how frail democracy has become; east of the Rhine it lingers only -in outlying regions. Constitutional control over armaments must, -therefore, be regarded as another liberal principal which is rapidly -becoming obsolete. - -It would seem probable that, in the next fifty years or so, we shall -see a still further increase in the power of governments, and a -tendency for governments to be such as are desired by the men who -control armaments and raw materials. The forms of democracy may survive -in western countries, since those who possess military and economic -power can control education and the press, and therefore can usually -secure a subservient democracy. Rival economic groups will presumably -remain associated with rival nations, and will foster nationalism in -order to recruit their football teams. - -There is, however, a hopeful element in the problem. The planet is -of finite size, but the most efficient size for an organization -is continually increased by new scientific inventions. The world -becomes more and more of an economic unity. Before very long the -technical conditions will exist for organizing the whole world as one -producing and consuming unit. If, when that time comes, two rival -groups contend for mastery, the victor may be able to introduce that -single world-wide organization that is needed to prevent the mutual -extermination of civilized nations. The world which would result -would be, at first, very different from the dreams of either liberals -or socialists; but it might grow less different with the lapse of -time. There would be at first economic and political tyranny of -the victors, a dread of renewed upheavals, and therefore a drastic -suppression of liberty. But if the first half-dozen revolts were -successfully repressed, the vanquished would give up hope, and accept -the subordinate place assigned to them by the victors in the great -world-trust. As soon as the holders of power felt secure, they would -grow less tyrannical and less energetic. The motive of rivalry being -removed, they would not work so hard as they do now, and would soon -cease to exact such hard work from their subordinates. Life at first -might be unpleasant, but it would at least be possible, which would be -enough to recommend the system after a long period of warfare. Given a -stable world-organization, economic and political, even if, at first, -it rested upon nothing but armed force, the evils which now threaten -civilization would gradually diminish, and a more thorough democracy -than that which now exists might become possible. I believe that, owing -to men’s folly, a world-government will only be established by force, -and will therefore be at first cruel and despotic. But I believe that -it is necessary for the preservation of a scientific civilization, -and that, if once realized, it will gradually give rise to the other -conditions of a tolerable existence. - - - - -IV. THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCES - - -It remains to say something about the future effects of the -anthropological sciences. This is of course extremely conjectural, -because we do not know what discoveries will be made. The effect -is likely to be far greater than we can now imagine, because these -sciences are still in their infancy. I will, however, take a few points -on which to hang conjectures. I do not wish to be supposed to be -making prophecies: I am only suggesting possibilities which it may be -instructive to consider. - -Birth-control is a matter of great importance, particularly in -relation to the possibility of a world-government, which could hardly -be stable if some nations increased their population much more -rapidly than others. At present, birth-control is increasing in all -civilized countries, though in most it is opposed by governments. This -opposition is due partly to mere superstition and desire to conciliate -the Catholic vote, partly to the desire for large armies and severe -competition between wage-earners, so as to keep down wages. In spite -of the opposition of governments, it seems probable that birth-control -will lead to a stationary population in most white nations within the -next fifty years. There can be no security that it will stop with a -stationary population; it may go on to the point where the population -diminishes. - -The increase in the practice of birth-control is an example of a -process contrary to that seen in industrialism: it represents a -victory of individual over collective passions. Collectively, Frenchmen -desire that France should be populous, in order to be able to defeat -her enemies in war. Individually, they desire that their own families -should be small, in order to increase the inheritance of their children -and to diminish the expense of education. The individual desire has -triumphed over the collective desire, and even, in many cases, over -religious scruples. In this case, as in most others, the individual -desire is less harmful to the world than the collective desire: the man -who acts from pure selfishness does less damage than the man who is -actuated by “public spirit.” For, since medicine and sanitation have -diminished the infant death-rate, the only checks to over-population -that remain (apart from birth-control) are war and famine. So long -as this continues to be the case, the world must either have a nearly -stationary population, or employ war to produce famine. The latter -method, which is that favoured by opponents of birth-control, has been -adopted on a large scale since 1914; it is however somewhat wasteful. -We require a certain number of cattle and sheep, and we take steps -to secure the right number. If we were as indifferent about them as -we are about human beings, we should produce far too many, and cause -the surplus to die by the slow misery of under-feeding. Farmers would -consider this plan extravagant, and humanitarians would consider it -cruel. But where human beings are concerned, it is considered the only -proper course, and works advocating any other are confiscated by the -police if they are intelligible to those whom they concern. - -It must be admitted, however, that there are certain dangers. Before -long the population may actually diminish. This is already happening -in the most intelligent sections of the most intelligent nations; -government opposition to birth-control propaganda gives a biological -advantage to stupidity, since it is chiefly stupid people whom -governments succeed in keeping in ignorance. Before long, birth-control -may become nearly universal among the white races; it will then not -deteriorate their quality, but only diminish their numbers, at a time -when uncivilized races are still prolific and are preserved from a high -death-rate by white science. - -This situation will lead to a tendency--already shown by the -French--to employ more prolific races as mercenaries. Governments will -oppose the teaching of birth-control among Africans, for fear of losing -recruits. The result will be an immense numerical inferiority of the -white races, leading probably to their extermination in a mutiny of -mercenaries. If, however, a world-government is established, it may see -the desirability of making subject races also less prolific, and may -permit mankind to solve the population question. This is another reason -for desiring a world-government. - -Passing from quantity to quality of population, we come to the -question of eugenics. We may perhaps assume that, if people grow less -superstitious, governments will acquire the right to sterilize those -who are not considered desirable as parents. This power will be -used, at first, to diminish imbecility, a most desirable object. But -probably, in time, opposition to the government will be taken to prove -imbecility, so that rebels of all kinds will be sterilized. Epileptics, -consumptives, dipsomaniacs and so on will gradually be included; in -the end, there will be a tendency to include all who fail to pass the -usual school examinations. The result will be to increase the average -intelligence; in the long run, it may be greatly increased. But -probably the effect upon really exceptional intelligence will be bad. -Mr. Micawber, who was Dickens’s father, would hardly have been regarded -as a desirable parent. How many imbeciles ought to outweigh one Dickens -I do not profess to know. - -Eugenics has, of course, more ambitious possibilities in a more -distant future. It may aim not only at eliminating undesired types, -but at increasing desired types. Moral standards may alter so as to -make it possible for one man to be the sire of a vast progeny by -many different mothers. When men of science envisage a possibility -of this kind, they are prone to a type of fallacy which is common -also in other directions. They imagine that a reform inaugurated by -men of science would be administered as men of science would wish, -by men similar in outlook to those who have advocated it. In like -manner women who advocated votes for women used to imagine that the -woman voter of the future would resemble the ardent feminist who won -her the vote; and socialist leaders imagine that a socialist State -would be administered by idealistic reformers like themselves. These -are, of course, delusions; a reform, once achieved, is handed over -to the average citizen. So, if eugenics reached the point where it -could increase desired types, it would not be the types desired by -present-day eugenists that would be increased, but rather the types -desired by the average official. Prime Ministers, Bishops, and others -whom the State considers desirable might become the fathers of half the -next generation. Whether this would be an improvement it is not for me -to say, as I have no hope of ever becoming either a Bishop or a Prime -Minister. - -If we knew enough about heredity to determine, within limits, what -sort of population we would have, the matter would of course be in the -hands of State officials, presumably elderly medical men. Whether they -would really be preferable to Nature I do not feel sure. I suspect that -they would breed a subservient population, convenient to rulers but -incapable of initiative. However, it may be that I am too sceptical of -the wisdom of officials. - -The effects of psychology on practical life may in time become very -great. Already advertisers in America employ eminent psychologists -to instruct them in the technique of producing irrational belief; -such men may, when they have grown more proficient, be very useful in -persuading the democracy that governments are wise and good. Then, -again, there are the psychological tests of intelligence, as applied -to recruits for the American army during the war. I am very sceptical -of the possibility of testing anything except average intelligence -by such methods, and I think that, if they were widely adopted, they -would probably lead to many persons of great artistic capacity being -classified as morons. The same thing would have happened to some -first-rate mathematicians. Specialized ability not infrequently goes -with general disability, but this would not be shown by the kind of -tests which psychologists recommended to the American government. - -More sensational than tests of intelligence is the possibility of -controlling the emotional life through the secretions of the ductless -glands. It will be possible to make people choleric or timid, strongly -or weakly sexed, and so on, as may be desired. Differences of emotional -disposition seem to be chiefly due to secretions of the ductless -glands, and therefore controllable by injections or by increasing -or diminishing the secretions. Assuming an oligarchic organization -of society, the State could give to the children of holders of power -the disposition required for command, and to the children of the -proletariat the disposition required for obedience. Against the -injections of the State physicians the most eloquent Socialist oratory -would be powerless. The only difficulty would be to combine this -submissiveness with the necessary ferocity against external enemies; -but I do not doubt that official science would be equal to the task. - -It is not necessary, when we are considering political consequences, -to pin our faith to the particular theories of the ductless glands, -which may blow over, like other theories. All that is essential in -our hypothesis is the belief that physiology will in time find ways of -controlling emotion, which it is scarcely possible to doubt. When that -day comes, we shall have the emotions desired by our rulers, and the -chief business of elementary education will be to produce the desired -disposition, no longer by punishment or moral precept, but by the far -surer method of injection or diet. The men who will administer this -system will have a power beyond the dreams of the Jesuits, but there -is no reason to suppose that they will have more sense than the men -who control education to-day. Technical scientific knowledge does not -make men sensible in their aims, and administrators in the future, will -be presumably no less stupid and no less prejudiced than they are at -present. - - - - -CONCLUSION - - -It may seem as though I had been at once gloomy and frivolous in some -of my prognostications. I will end, however, with the serious lesson -which seems to me to result. Men sometimes speak as though the progress -of science must necessarily be a boon to mankind, but that, I fear, -is one of the comfortable nineteenth-century delusions which our more -disillusioned age must discard. Science enables the holders of power -to realize their purposes more fully than they could otherwise do. If -their purposes are good, this is a gain; if they are evil, it is a -loss. In the present age, it seems that the purposes of the holders -of power are in the main evil, in the sense that they involve a -diminution, in the world at large, of the things men are agreed in -thinking good. Therefore, at present, science does harm by increasing -the power of rulers. Science is no substitute for virtue; the heart is -as necessary for a good life as the head. - -If men were rational in their conduct, that is to say, if they acted -in the way most likely to bring about the ends that they deliberately -desire, intelligence would be enough to make the world almost a -paradise. In the main, what is in the long run advantageous to one -man is also advantageous to another. But men are actuated by passions -which distort their view; feeling an impulse to injure others, they -persuade themselves that it is to their interest to do so. They -will not, therefore, act in the way which is in fact to their own -interest unless they are actuated by generous impulses which make -them indifferent to their own interest. This is why the heart is as -important as the head. By the “heart” I mean, for the moment, the -sum-total of kindly impulses. Where they exist, science helps them -to be effective; where they are absent, science only makes men more -cleverly diabolic. - -It may be laid down as a general principle to which there are few -exceptions that, when people are mistaken as to what is to their own -interest, the course they believe to be wise is more harmful to others -than the course that really is wise. There are innumerable examples of -men making fortunes because, on moral grounds, they did something which -they believed to be contrary to their own interests. For instance, -among early Quakers there were a number of shopkeepers, who adopted -the practice of asking no more for their goods than they were willing -to accept, instead of bargaining with each customer, as everybody else -did. They adopted this practice because they held it to be a lie to -ask more than they would take. But the convenience to customers was so -great that everybody came to their shops and they grew rich. (I forget -where I read this, but if my memory serves me it was in some reliable -source). The same policy _might_ have been adopted from shrewdness, -but in fact no one was sufficiently shrewd. Our unconscious is more -malevolent than it pays us to be; therefore the people who do most -completely what is in fact to their interest are those who, on moral -grounds, do what they believe to be against their interest. - -For this reason, it is of the greatest importance to inquire whether -any method of strengthening kindly impulses exists. I have no doubt -that their strength or weakness depends upon discoverable physiological -causes; let us assume that it depends upon the glands. If so, an -international secret society of physiologists could bring about the -millennium by kidnapping, on a given day, all the rulers of the world, -and injecting into their blood some substance which would fill them -with benevolence towards their fellow-creatures. Suddenly M. Poincare -would wish well to Ruhr miners, Lord Curzon to Indian nationalists, -Mr. Smuts to the natives of what was German South West Africa, the -American Government to its political prisoners and its victims in Ellis -Island. But alas, the physiologists would first have to administer the -love-philtre to themselves before they would undertake such a task. -Otherwise, they would prefer to win titles and fortunes by injecting -military ferocity into recruits. And so we come back to the old -dilemma: only kindliness can save the world, and even if we knew how to -produce kindliness we should not do so unless we were already kindly. -Failing that, it seems that the solution which the Houynhnms adopted -towards the Yahoos, namely extermination, is the only one; apparently -the Yahoos are bent on applying it to each other. - -We may sum up this discussion in a few words. Science has not given -men more self-control, more kindliness, or more power of discounting -their passions in deciding upon a course of action. It has given -communities more power to indulge their collective passions, but, -by making society more organic, it has diminished the part played -by private passions. Men’s collective passions are mainly evil; far -the strongest of them are hatred and rivalry directed towards other -groups. Therefore at present all that gives men power to indulge their -collective passions is bad. That is why science threatens to cause the -destruction of our civilization. The only solid hope seems to lie in -the possibility of world-wide domination by one group, say the United -States, leading to the gradual formation of an orderly economic and -political world-government. But perhaps, in view of the sterility of -the Roman Empire, the collapse of our civilization would in the end be -preferable to this alternative. - - - - -Transcriber’s Notes - - -Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent when a -predominant preference was found in the original book; otherwise they -were not changed. - -Simple typographical errors were corrected; unbalanced quotation -marks were remedied when the change was obvious, and otherwise left -unbalanced. - -Table of Contents added by Transcriber. - -*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ICARUS *** - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will -be renamed. - -Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright -law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, -so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the -United States without permission and without paying copyright -royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part -of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm -concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, -and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following -the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use -of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for -copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very -easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation -of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project -Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may -do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected -by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark -license, especially commercial redistribution. - -START: FULL LICENSE - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full -Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at -www.gutenberg.org/license. - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or -destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your -possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a -Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound -by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the -person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph -1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this -agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the -Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection -of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual -works in the collection are in the public domain in the United -States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the -United States and you are located in the United States, we do not -claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, -displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as -all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope -that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting -free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm -works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the -Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily -comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the -same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when -you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are -in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, -check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this -agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, -distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any -other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no -representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any -country other than the United States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other -immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear -prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work -on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, -performed, viewed, copied or distributed: - - This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and - most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no - restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it - under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this - eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the - United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where - you are located before using this eBook. - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is -derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not -contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the -copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in -the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are -redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply -either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or -obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm -trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any -additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms -will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works -posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the -beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including -any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access -to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format -other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official -version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website -(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense -to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means -of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain -Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the -full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -provided that: - -* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed - to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has - agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid - within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are - legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty - payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in - Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg - Literary Archive Foundation." - -* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all - copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue - all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm - works. - -* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of - any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of - receipt of the work. - -* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than -are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing -from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of -the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set -forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project -Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may -contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate -or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other -intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or -other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or -cannot be read by your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium -with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you -with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in -lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person -or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second -opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If -the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing -without further opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO -OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT -LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of -damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement -violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the -agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or -limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or -unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the -remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in -accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the -production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, -including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of -the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this -or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or -additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any -Defect you cause. - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of -computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It -exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations -from people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future -generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see -Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at -www.gutenberg.org - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by -U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, -Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up -to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website -and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without -widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND -DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular -state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To -donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project -Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be -freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and -distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of -volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in -the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not -necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper -edition. - -Most people start at our website which has the main PG search -facility: www.gutenberg.org - -This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/old/66225-0.zip b/old/66225-0.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 65872c1..0000000 --- a/old/66225-0.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/66225-h.zip b/old/66225-h.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 61e4696..0000000 --- a/old/66225-h.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/66225-h/66225-h.htm b/old/66225-h/66225-h.htm deleted file mode 100644 index 45da9f8..0000000 --- a/old/66225-h/66225-h.htm +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2034 +0,0 @@ -<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" - "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> -<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> - <head> - <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" /> - <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> - <title> - Icarus, or The Future of Science, by Bertrand Russell—A Project Gutenberg eBook - </title> - <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" /> - <style type="text/css"> - -body { - margin-left: 2.5em; - margin-right: 2.5em; -} - -h1, h2 { - text-align: center; - clear: both; - margin-top: 2.5em; - margin-bottom: 1em; - word-spacing: .2em; -} - -h2+p {margin-top: 1.5em;} - -.transnote h2 { - margin-top: .5em; - margin-bottom: 1em; -} - -p { - text-indent: 1.75em; - margin-top: .51em; - margin-bottom: .24em; - text-align: justify; -} -.center p, p.center {text-align: center; text-indent: 0;} - -.p0 {margin-top: 0em;} -.p2 {margin-top: 2em;} -.p4 {margin-top: 4em;} -.vspace {line-height: 1.5;} - -.in0 {text-indent: 0;} - -.xxsmall {font-size: 50%;} -.xsmall {font-size: 60%;} -.small {font-size: 70%;} -.larger {font-size: 125%;} -.xlarge {font-size: 175%;} -.xxlarge {font-size: 200%;} - -.center {text-align: center;} - -.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} - -.bold {font-weight: bold;} - -hr { - width: 75%; - margin: 4em auto 4em auto; - clear: both; -} - -table { - margin-left: auto; - margin-right: auto; - max-width: 80%; - border-collapse: collapse; -} - -td {padding-bottom: .75em;} -.small td {padding-bottom: .1em;} - -.tdl { - text-align: left; - vertical-align: top; - padding-right: 1em; - padding-left: 1.5em; - text-indent: -1.5em; -} - -.tdr { - text-align: right; - vertical-align: bottom; - padding-left: .3em; - white-space: nowrap; -} -.tdr.top{vertical-align: top; padding-left: 0; padding-right: .5em;} - -.pagenum { - position: absolute; - right: .25em; - text-indent: 0; - text-align: right; - font-size: 70%; - font-weight: normal; - font-variant: normal; - font-style: normal; - letter-spacing: normal; - line-height: normal; - color: #acacac; - border: .0625em solid #acacac; - background: #ffffff; - padding: .0625em .125em; -} - -.figcenter { - margin: 2em auto 2em auto; - text-align: center; - page-break-inside: avoid; - max-width: 100%; -} - -img { - padding: 1em 0 .5em 0; - max-width: 100%; - height: auto; -} - -a.ref {text-decoration: none;} - -.footnote { - border: thin dashed black; - margin: 1.5em 10%; - padding: .5em 1em .5em 1.5em; -} - -.footnote {font-size: .95em;} -.footnote p {text-indent: 1em;} - -.fnanchor { - vertical-align: 60%; - line-height: .7; - font-size: smaller; - text-decoration: none; -} -.footnote .fnanchor {font-size: .8em;} - -.transnote { - background-color: #999999; - border: thin dotted; - font-family: sans-serif, serif; - margin-left: 5%; - margin-right: 5%; - margin-top: 4em; - margin-bottom: 2em; - padding: 1em; -} - -.gesperrt { - letter-spacing: 0.2em; - margin-right: -0.2em; -} -.wspace {word-spacing: .3em;} - -.pagenum br {display: none; visibility: hidden;} -.bbox {border: .2em solid black; padding: 0; margin: 4em auto 4em auto; max-width: 20em; page-break-before: always; page-break-after: always;} -.bbox hr { - width: 100%; - margin: .2em 0 .2em 0; - border: thin double black; padding: 0; -} -p.narrow {margin: .75em;} -.bt {border-top: thin solid black; padding: .3em 2em 0 2em;} - -@media print, handheld -{ - body {margin: 0;} - - h1, .chapter, .newpage {page-break-before: always;} - h1.nobreak, h2.nobreak, .nobreak {page-break-before: avoid; padding-top: 0;} - - p { - margin-top: .5em; - text-align: justify; - margin-bottom: .25em; - } - - table {width: auto; max-width: 100%; margin: 1em auto 1em auto;} - - .tdl { - padding-left: 1em; - text-indent: -1em; - padding-right: 0; - } - - .figcenter {max-width: 100%; margin: 0 auto 0 auto;} - img {max-height: 80%;} - - hr { - margin-top: .1em; - margin-bottom: .1em; - visibility: hidden; - color: white; - width: .01em; - display: none; - } - - .bbox hr {visibility: visible; color: inherit; width: 100%; display: block;} - - .transnote { - page-break-inside: avoid; - margin-left: 2%; - margin-right: 2%; - margin-top: 1em; - margin-bottom: 1em; - padding: .5em; - } -} - </style> - </head> - -<body> - -<div style='text-align:center; font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold'>The Project Gutenberg eBook of Icarus, by Bertrand Russell</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and -most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions -whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms -of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online -at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you -are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the -country where you are located before using this eBook. -</div> - -<p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Title: Icarus</p> -<p style='display:block; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:0;'>or, The Future of Science</p> - -<div style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Author: Bertrand Russell</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Release Date: September 5, 2021 [eBook #66225]</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Language: English</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Character set encoding: UTF-8</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Produced by: Tim Lindell, Charlie Howard, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)</div> - -<div style='margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:4em'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ICARUS ***</div> - -<div class="figcenter" style="max-width: 25em;"> - <img src="images/cover.jpg" width="1458" height="2196" alt="cover" /> -</div> - -<h1 class="vspace"><span class="gesperrt">ICARUS</span><br /> -<span class="xsmall">OR</span><br /> -THE FUTURE OF SCIENCE</h1> - -<div class="chapter"> - -<div class="bbox"> -<p class="center bold larger wspace">BY THE SAME AUTHOR</p> - -<hr /> - -<p class="center xlarge bold wspace">The A.B.C. OF ATOMS</p> - -<p class="p0 center bold wspace">12mo., cloth $2.00</p> - -<p class="in0 narrow">In the last few years the -study of Radioactivity has -brought about amazing advances -in our knowledge of -the properties and nature of -the Atom; and into this fascinating -wonderland of the -infinitely small yet infinitely -complex and infinitely full of -energy, Mr. Russell introduces -us.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p class="in0 bold center larger"> -E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY<br /> -<span class="wspace">681 Fifth Avenue, New York</span> -</p> -</div></div> - -<div class="newpage p4 center vspace wspace"> -<p class="xxlarge"> -<span class="gesperrt">ICARUS</span><br /> - -<span class="xxsmall">OR</span><br /> - -The Future of Science</p> - -<p class="p2">BY<br /> - -<span class="larger">BERTRAND RUSSELL</span></p> - -<div class="figcenter" style="max-width: 8em;"> - <img src="images/i_001.png" width="461" height="433" alt="logo" /> -</div> - -<p class="p2"><span class="smcap">New York</span><br /> -<span class="larger">E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY</span><br /> -<span class="smcap">681 Fifth Avenue</span> -</p> - -<hr /> - -<p class="newpage p2"> -Copyright, 1924<br /> -By E. P. Dutton & Company</p> - -<p><i>All Rights Reserved</i></p> - -<p>First printing, April, 1924<br /> -Second printing, June, 1924<br /> -Third printing, October, 1924<br /> -Fourth printing, December, 1924<br /> -Fifth Printing, December, 1924<br /> -Sixth Printing, June, 1925<br /> -Seventh Printing, June, 1925</p> - -<p class="p4"><span class="bt">Printed in the United States of America</span></p> -</div> - -<hr /> -<h2>CONTENTS</h2> - -<table id="toc" summary="Contents"> -<tr class="small"> - <td colspan="2"> </td> - <td class="tdr">PAGE</td> -</tr> -<tr> - <td class="tdr top">I.</td> - <td class="tdl">Introductory</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_5">5</a></td> -</tr> -<tr> - <td class="tdr top">II.</td> - <td class="tdl">Effects of the Physical Sciences</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_15">15</a></td> -</tr> -<tr> - <td class="tdr top">III.</td> - <td class="tdl">The Increase of Organization</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_23">23</a></td> -</tr> -<tr> - <td class="tdr top">IV.</td> - <td class="tdl">The Anthropological Sciences</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_43">43</a></td> -</tr> -<tr> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl">Conclusion</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#toclink_57">57</a></td> -</tr> -</table> - -<hr /> - -<div id="toclink_5" class="chapter"> -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">5</span></p> -<h2 class="nobreak vspace" id="ICARUS">ICARUS<br /> - -<span class="small">OR</span><br /> - -THE FUTURE OF SCIENCE</h2> - -<h2 class="nobreak" id="I_INTRODUCTORY">I. INTRODUCTORY</h2> -</div> - -<p>Mr. Haldane’s <cite>Daedalus</cite> has set forth -an attractive picture of the future as it -may become through the use of -scientific discoveries to promote human -happiness. Much as I should like to -agree with his forecast, a long experience -of statesmen and governments has -made me somewhat sceptical. I am -compelled to fear that science will be -used to promote the power of dominant -groups, rather than to make men happy. -Icarus, having been taught to fly by his -father Daedalus, was destroyed by his -rashness. I fear that the same fate<span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">6</span> -may overtake the populations whom -modern men of science have taught to -fly. Some of the dangers inherent in the -progress of science while we retain our -present political and economic institutions -are set forth in the following -pages.</p> - -<p>This subject is so vast that it is impossible, -within a limited space, to do -more than outline some of its aspects. -The world in which we live differs -profoundly from that of Queen Anne’s -time, and this difference is mainly -attributable to science. That is to say, -the difference would be very much less -than it is but for various scientific -discoveries, but resulted from those -discoveries by the operation of ordinary -human nature. The changes that have -been brought about have been partly<span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">7</span> -good, partly bad; whether, in the end, -science will prove to have been a -blessing or a curse to mankind, is to -my mind, still a doubtful question.</p> - -<p>A science may affect human life in -two different ways. On the one hand, -without altering men’s passions or their -general outlook, it may increase their -power of gratifying their desires. On -the other hand, it may operate through -an effect upon the imaginative conception -of the world, the theology or -philosophy which is accepted in practice -by energetic men. The latter is a -fascinating study, but I shall almost -wholly ignore it, in order to bring my -subject within a manageable compass. -I shall confine myself almost wholly to -the effect of science in enabling us to -gratify our passions more freely, which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">8</span> -has hitherto been far the more important -of the two.</p> - -<p>From our point of view, we may -divide the sciences into three groups: -physical, biological, and anthropological. -In the physical group I include -chemistry, and broadly speaking -any science concerned with the properties -of matter apart from life. In -the anthropological group I include -all studies specially concerned with -man: human physiology and psychology -(between which no sharp line can be -drawn), anthropology, history, sociology, -and economics. All these studies -can be illuminated by considerations -drawn from biology; for instance, -Rivers threw a new light on parts of -economics by adducing facts about -landed property among birds during<span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">9</span> -the breeding season. But in spite of -their connection with biology—a connection -which is likely to grow closer -as time goes on—they are broadly -distinguished from biology by their -methods and data, and deserve to be -grouped apart, at any rate in a sociological -inquiry.</p> - -<p>The effect of the biological sciences, -so far, has been very small. No doubt -Darwinism and the idea of evolution -affected men’s imaginative outlook; -arguments were derived in favour of -free competition, and also of nationalism. -But these effects were of the sort that -I propose not to consider. It is probable -that great effects will come from these -sciences sooner or later. Mendelism -might have revolutionized agriculture, -and no doubt some similar theory will<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">10</span> -do so sooner or later. Bacteriology may -enable us to exterminate our enemies -by disease. The study of heredity may -in time make eugenics an exact science, -and perhaps we shall in a later age be -able to determine at will the sex of our -children. This would probably lead to -an excess of males, involving a complete -change in family institutions. But -these speculations belong to the future. -I do not propose to deal with the -possible future effects of biology, both -because my knowledge of biology is very -limited, and because the subject has -been admirably treated by Mr. Haldane.<a id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">1</a></p> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="fnanchor">1</a> See his <cite>Daedalus, or Science and the Future</cite>.</p> - -</div> - -<p>The anthropological sciences are those -from which, <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">a priori</i>, we might have -expected the greatest social effects, but<span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">11</span> -hitherto this has not proved to be the -case, partly because these sciences are -mostly still at an early stage of development. -Even economics has not so far -had much effect. Where it has seemed -to have, this is because it advocated -what was independently desired. -Hitherto, the most effective of the -anthropological sciences has been medicine, -through its influence on sanitation -and public health, and through the fact -that it has discovered how to deal with -malaria and yellow fever. Birth-control -is also a very important social fact -which comes into this category. But -although the future effect of the anthropological -sciences (to which I shall -return presently) is illimitable, the -effect up to the present has been confined -within fairly narrow limits.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">12</span></p> - -<p>One general observation to begin -with. Science has increased man’s -control over nature, and might therefore -be supposed likely to increase his -happiness and well-being. This would -be the case if men were rational, but in -fact they are bundles of passions and -instincts. An animal species in a stable -environment, if it does not die out, -acquires an equilibrium between its -passions and the conditions of its life. -If the conditions are suddenly altered, -the equilibrium is upset. Wolves in a -state of nature have difficulty in getting -food, and therefore need the stimulus -of a very insistent hunger. The result -is that their descendants, domestic dogs, -over-eat if they are allowed to do so. -When a certain amount of something is -useful, and the difficulty of obtaining it<span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">13</span> -is diminished, instinct will usually lead -an animal to excess in the new circumstances. -The sudden change produced -by science has upset the balance between -our instincts and our circumstances, -but in directions not sufficiently -noticed. Over-eating is not a serious -danger, but over-fighting is. The -human instincts of power and rivalry, -like the dog’s wolfish appetite will need -to be artificially curbed, if industrialism -is to succeed.</p> - -<hr /> - -<div id="toclink_15" class="chapter"> -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">15</span></p> - -<h2 class="nobreak" id="II_EFFECTS_OF_THE_PHYSICAL">II. EFFECTS OF THE PHYSICAL -SCIENCES</h2> -</div> - -<p>Much the greatest part of the changes -which science has made in social life is -due to the physical sciences, as is -evident when we consider that they -brought about the industrial revolution. -This is a trite topic, about which I shall -say as little as my subject permits. -There are, however, some points which -must be made.</p> - -<p>First, industrialism, still has great -parts of the earth’s surface to conquer. -Russia and India are very imperfectly -industrialized; China hardly at all. -In South America there is room for -immense development. One of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">16</span> -effects of industrialism is to make the -world an economic unit: its ultimate -consequences will be very largely due -to this fact. But before the world -can be effectively organized as a unit, -it will probably be necessary to develop -industrially all the regions capable of -development that are at present backward. -The effects of industrialism -change as it becomes more wide-spread; -this must be remembered in any attempt -to argue from its past to its future.</p> - -<p>The second point about industrialism -is that it increases the productivity of -labour, and thus makes more luxuries -possible. At first, in England, the chief -luxury achieved was a larger population -with an actual lowering of the standard -of life. Then came a golden age when -wages increased, hours of labour<span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">17</span> -diminished, and simultaneously the -middle-class grew more prosperous. -That was while Great Britain was still -supreme. With the growth of foreign -industrialism, a new epoch began. -Industrial organizations have seldom -succeeded in becoming world-wide, and -have consequently become national. -Competition, formerly between individual -firms, is now mainly between -nations, and is therefore conducted by -methods quite different from those -contemplated by the classical -economists.</p> - -<p>Modern industrialism is a struggle -between nations for two things, markets -and raw materials, as well as for the -sheer pleasure of dominion. The labour -which is set free from providing the -necessaries of life tends to be more and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">18</span> -more absorbed by national rivalry. -There are first the armed forces of the -State; then those who provide -munitions of war, from the raw minerals -up to the finished product; then the -diplomatic and consular services; then -the teachers of patriotism in schools; -then the Press. All of these perform -other functions as well, but the chief -purpose is to minister to international -competition. As another class whose -labours are devoted to the same end, -we must add a considerable proportion -of the men of science. These men -invent continually more elaborate -methods of attack and defence. The -net result of their labours is to diminish -the proportion of the population that -can be put into the fighting line, since -more are required for munitions. This<span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">19</span> -might seem a boon, but in fact war is -now-a-days primarily against the -civilian population, and in a defeated -country they are liable to suffer just -as much as the soldiers.</p> - -<p>It is science above all that has -determined the importance of raw -materials in international competition. -Coal and iron and oil, especially, are -the bases of power, and thence of -wealth. The nation which possesses -them, and has the industrial skill required -to utilize them in war, can -acquire markets by armed force, and -levy tribute upon less fortunate nations. -Economists have underestimated the -part played by military prowess in the -acquisition of wealth. The landed -aristocracies of Europe were, in origin, -warlike invaders. Their defeat by the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">20</span> -bourgeoisie in the French Revolution, -and the fear which this generated in -the Duke of Wellington, facilitated the -rise of the middle class. The wars of -the eighteenth century decided that -England was to be richer than France. -The traditional economist’s rules for -the distribution of wealth hold only -when men’s actions are governed by -law, i.e. when most people think the -issue unimportant. The issues that -people have considered vital have been -decided by civil wars or wars between -nations. And for the present, owing to -science, the art of war consists in -possessing coal, iron, oil, and the -industrial skill to work them. For the -sake of simplicity, I omit other raw -materials, since they do not affect the -essence of our problem.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">21</span></p> - -<p>We may say, therefore, speaking very -generally, that men have used the increased -productivity which they owe -to science for three chief purposes in -succession: first, to increase the -population; then, to raise the standard -of comfort; and, finally, to provide -more energy to war. This last result -has been chiefly brought about by -competition for markets, which led to -competition for raw materials, especially -the raw materials of munitions.</p> - -<hr /> - -<div id="toclink_23" class="chapter"> -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">23</span></p> - -<h2 class="nobreak" id="III_THE_INCREASE_OF">III. THE INCREASE OF -ORGANIZATION</h2> -</div> - -<p>The stimulation of nationalism which -has taken place in modern times is, -however, due very largely to another -factor, namely the increase of organization, -which is of the very essence of -industrialism. Wherever expensive -fixed capital is required, organization -on a large scale is of course necessary. -In view of the economies of large scale -production, organization in marketing -also becomes of great importance. -For some purposes, if not for all, many -industries come to be organized nationally, -so as to be in effect one business -in each nation.</p> - -<p>Science has not only brought about<span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">24</span> -the need of large organizations, but also -the technical possibility of their existence. -Without railways, telegraphs, -and telephones, control from a centre -is very difficult. In ancient empires, -and in China down to modern times, -provinces were governed by practically -independent satraps or proconsuls, who -were appointed by the central government, -but decided almost all questions -on their own initiative. If they displeased -the sovereign, they could only -be controlled by civil war, of which the -issue was doubtful. Until the invention -of the telegraph, ambassadors had a -great measure of independence, since -it was often necessary to act without -waiting for orders from home. What -applied in politics applied also in business: -an organization controlled from<span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">25</span> -the centre had to be very loosely knit, -and to allow much autonomy to -subordinates. Opinion as well as action -was difficult to mould from a centre, -and local variations marred the -uniformity of party creeds.</p> - -<p>Now-a-days all this is changed. -Telegraph, telephone, and wireless make -it easy to transmit orders from a centre: -railways and steamers make it easy to -transport troops in case the orders are -disobeyed. Modern methods of printing -and advertising make it enormously -cheaper to produce and distribute one -newspaper with a large circulation than -many with small circulations; consequently, -in so far as the Press controls -opinion, there is uniformity, and, in -particular, there is uniformity of news. -Elementary education, except in so far<span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">26</span> -as religious denominations introduce -variety, is conducted on a uniform -pattern decided by the State, by means -of teachers whom the State has trained, -as far as possible, to imitate the regularity -and mutual similarity of machines -produced to standard. Thus the -material and psychological conditions -for a great intensity of organization -have increased <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">pari passu</i>, but the basis -of the whole development is scientific -invention in the purely physical realm. -Increased productivity has played its -part, by making it possible to set apart -more labour for propaganda, under -which head are to be included advertisement, -the cinema, the Press, education, -politics, and religion. Broadcasting is -a new method likely to acquire great -potency as soon as people are satisfied<span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">27</span> -that it is <em>not</em> a method of propaganda.</p> - -<p>Political controversies, as Mr. Graham -Wallas has pointed out, ought to be -conducted in quantitative terms. If -sociology were one of the sciences that -had affected social institutions (which -it is not), this would be the case. The -dispute between anarchism and bureaucracy -at present tends to take the form -of one side maintaining that we want no -organization, while the other maintains -that we want as much as possible. A -person imbued with the scientific spirit -would hardly even examine these extreme -positions. Some people think -that we keep our rooms too hot for -health, others that we keep them too -cold. If this were a political question, -one party would maintain that the best -temperature is the absolute zero, the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">28</span> -other that it is the melting point of -iron. Those who maintained any intermediate -position would be abused as -timorous time-servers, concealed agents -of the other side, men who ruined the -enthusiasm of a sacred cause by tepid -appeals to mere reason. Any man who -had the courage to say that our rooms -ought to be neither very hot nor very -cold would be abused by both parties, -and probably shot in No Man’s Land. -Possibly some day politics may become -more rational, but so far there is not the -faintest indication of a change in this -direction.</p> - -<p>To a rational mind, the question is -not: Do we want organization or do we -not? The question is: How much -organization do we want, and where and -when and of what kind? In spite of a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">29</span> -temperamental leaning to anarchism, -I am persuaded that an industrial -world cannot maintain itself against -internal disruptive forces without a -great deal more organization than we -have at present. It is not the amount -of organization, but its kind and its -purposes, that cause our troubles. But -before tackling this question, let us -pause for a moment to ask ourselves -what is the measure of the intensity of -organization in a given community.</p> - -<p>A man’s acts are partly determined -by spontaneous impulse, partly by the -conscious or unconscious effects of the -various groups to which he belongs. -A man who works (say) on a railway or -in a mine is, in his working-hours -almost entirely determined in his actions -by those who direct the collective<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">30</span> -labour of which he forms part. If he -decides to strike, his action is again not -individual, but determined by his -Union. When he votes for Parliament, -party caucuses have limited his choice -to one of two or three men, and party -propaganda has induced him to accept -<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">in toto</i> one of the two or three blocks of -opinions which form the rival party -programmes. His choice between the -parties may be individual, but it may -also be determined by the action of -some group, such as a trade union, which -collectively supports one party. His -newspaper-reading exposes him to -great organized forces; so does the -cinema, if he goes to it. His choice of a -wife is probably spontaneous, except -that he must choose a woman of his own -class. But in the education of his -children he is almost entirely powerless:<span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">31</span> -they must have the education which is -provided. Organization thus determines -many vital things in his life. -Compare him with a handicraftsman or -peasant-proprietor who cannot read -and does not have his children educated, -and it becomes clear what is meant by -saying that industrialism has increased -the intensity of organization. To -define this term, we must, I think, -exclude the unconscious effects of -groups, except as causes facilitating -the conscious effects. We may define -the intensity of organization to which -a given individual is subject as the -proportion of his acts which is determined -by the orders or advice of some -group, expressed through democratic -decisions or executive officers. The -intensity of organization in a community -may then be defined as the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">32</span> -average intensity for its several -members.</p> - -<p>The intensity of organization is -increased not only when a man belongs -to more organizations, but also when -the organizations to which he already -belongs play a larger part in his life, -as, for example, the State plays a -larger part in war than in peace.</p> - -<p>Another matter which needs to be -treated quantitatively is the degree of -democracy, oligarchy, or monarchy in -an organization. No organization -belongs completely to any one of the -three types. There must be executive -officers, who will often in practice be -able to decide policy, even if in theory -they cannot do so. And even if their -power depends upon persuasion, they -may so completely control the relevant -publicity that they can always rely<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">33</span> -upon a majority. The directors of a -railway company, for instance, are to -all intents and purposes uncontrolled -by the shareholders, who have no -adequate means of organizing an -opposition if they should wish to do so. -In America, a railroad president is -almost a monarch. In party politics, -the power of leaders, although it -depends upon persuasion, continually -increases as printed propaganda becomes -more important. For these -reasons, even where formal democracy -increases, the real degree of democratic -control tends to diminish, except on a -few questions which rouse strong popular -passions.</p> - -<p>The result of these causes is that, in -consequence of scientific inventions -which facilitate centralization and propaganda, -groups become more organized,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">34</span> -more disciplined, more group-conscious, -and more docile to leaders. The effect -of leaders on followers is increased, and -the control of events by a few prominent -personalities becomes more marked.</p> - -<p>In all this there would be nothing -very tragic, but for the fact, with which -science has nothing to do, that organization -is almost wholly national. If men -were actuated by the love of gain, as -the older economists supposed, this -would not be the case; the same causes -which have led to national trusts would -have led to international trusts. This -has happened in a few instances, but -not on a sufficiently wide scale to -affect politics or economics very vitally. -Rivalry is, with most well-to-do -energetic people, a stronger motive -than love of money. Successful rivalry -requires organization of rival forces;<span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">35</span> -the tendency is for a business such as -oil, for example, to organize itself into -two rival groups, between them covering -the world. They might, of course, -combine, and they would no doubt -increase their wealth if they did so. -But combination would take the zest -out of life. The object of a football -team, one might say, is to kick goals. -If two rival teams combined, and -kicked the ball alternately over the two -goals, many more goals would be -scored. Nevertheless no one suggests -that this should be done, the object of -a football team being not to kick goals -but to win. So the object of a big -business is not to make money, but to -win in the contest with some other -business. If there were no other -business to be defeated, the whole thing -would become uninteresting. This<span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">36</span> -rivalry has attached itself to nationalism, -and enlisted the support of the -ordinary citizens of the countries concerned; -they seldom know what it is -that they are supporting, but, like the -spectators at a football-match, they -grow enthusiastic for their own side. -The harm that is being done by science -and industrialism is almost wholly due -to the fact that, while they have proved -strong enough to produce a <em>national</em> -organization of economic forces, they -have not proved strong enough to -produce an international organization. -It is clear that political internationalism -such as the League of Nations was -supposed to inaugurate, will never be -successful until we have economic -internationalism, which would require, -as a minimum, an agreement between -various national organizations dividing<span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">37</span> -among them the raw materials and -markets of the world. This, however, -can hardly be brought about while big -business is controlled by men who are -so rich as to have grown indifferent to -money, and to be willing to risk enormous -losses for the pleasure of rivalry.</p> - -<p>The increase of organization in the -modern world has made the ideals of -liberalism wholly inapplicable. Liberalism, -from Montesquieu to President -Wilson, was based upon the assumption -of a number of more or less equal -individuals or groups, with no differences -so vital that they were willing to -die sooner than compromise. It was -supposed that there was to be free -competition between individuals and -between ideas. Experience has shown, -however, that the existing economic -system is incompatible with all forms<span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">38</span> -of free competition except between -States by means of armaments. I -should wish, for my part, to preserve -free competition between ideas, though -not between individuals and groups, -but this is only possible by means of -what an old-fashioned liberal would -regard as interferences with personal -liberty. So long as the sources of -economic power remain in private -hands, there will be no liberty except -for the few who control those sources.</p> - -<p>Such liberal ideals as free trade, free -press, unbiased education, either already -belong to the past or soon will do so. -One of the triumphs of early liberalism -in England was the establishment of -parliamentary control over the army; -this was the <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">casus belli</i> in the Civil War, -and was decided by the Revolution of -1688. It was effective so long as<span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">39</span> -Parliament represented the same class -from which army officers were drawn. -This was still the case with the late -Parliament, but may cease to be the -case with the advent of a Labour -Government. Russia, Hungary, Italy, -Spain, and Bavaria have shown in -recent years how frail democracy has -become; east of the Rhine it lingers -only in outlying regions. Constitutional -control over armaments must, therefore, -be regarded as another liberal principal -which is rapidly becoming obsolete.</p> - -<p>It would seem probable that, in the -next fifty years or so, we shall see a -still further increase in the power of -governments, and a tendency for -governments to be such as are desired -by the men who control armaments -and raw materials. The forms of -democracy may survive in western<span class="pagenum" id="Page_40">40</span> -countries, since those who possess -military and economic power can control -education and the press, and therefore -can usually secure a subservient -democracy. Rival economic groups -will presumably remain associated with -rival nations, and will foster nationalism -in order to recruit their football teams.</p> - -<p>There is, however, a hopeful element -in the problem. The planet is of -finite size, but the most efficient size -for an organization is continually increased -by new scientific inventions. -The world becomes more and more of -an economic unity. Before very long -the technical conditions will exist for -organizing the whole world as one -producing and consuming unit. If, -when that time comes, two rival groups -contend for mastery, the victor may be -able to introduce that single world-wide<span class="pagenum" id="Page_41">41</span> -organization that is needed to prevent -the mutual extermination of civilized -nations. The world which would result -would be, at first, very different from -the dreams of either liberals or socialists; -but it might grow less different with the -lapse of time. There would be at first -economic and political tyranny of the -victors, a dread of renewed upheavals, -and therefore a drastic suppression of -liberty. But if the first half-dozen -revolts were successfully repressed, the -vanquished would give up hope, and -accept the subordinate place assigned -to them by the victors in the great -world-trust. As soon as the holders of -power felt secure, they would grow less -tyrannical and less energetic. The -motive of rivalry being removed, they -would not work so hard as they do now, -and would soon cease to exact such<span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">42</span> -hard work from their subordinates. -Life at first might be unpleasant, but -it would at least be possible, which -would be enough to recommend the -system after a long period of warfare. -Given a stable world-organization, economic -and political, even if, at first, it -rested upon nothing but armed force, -the evils which now threaten civilization -would gradually diminish, and a more -thorough democracy than that which -now exists might become possible. -I believe that, owing to men’s folly, a -world-government will only be established -by force, and will therefore be -at first cruel and despotic. But I believe -that it is necessary for the preservation -of a scientific civilization, and that, if -once realized, it will gradually give rise -to the other conditions of a tolerable -existence.</p> - -<hr /> - -<div id="toclink_43" class="chapter"> -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_43">43</span></p> - -<h2 class="nobreak" id="IV_THE_ANTHROPOLOGICAL">IV. THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL -SCIENCES</h2> -</div> - -<p>It remains to say something about -the future effects of the anthropological -sciences. This is of course extremely -conjectural, because we do not know -what discoveries will be made. The -effect is likely to be far greater than we -can now imagine, because these sciences -are still in their infancy. I will, however, -take a few points on which to hang -conjectures. I do not wish to be -supposed to be making prophecies: -I am only suggesting possibilities which -it may be instructive to consider.</p> - -<p>Birth-control is a matter of great -importance, particularly in relation to -the possibility of a world-government, -which could hardly be stable if some<span class="pagenum" id="Page_44">44</span> -nations increased their population much -more rapidly than others. At present, -birth-control is increasing in all civilized -countries, though in most it is opposed -by governments. This opposition is -due partly to mere superstition and -desire to conciliate the Catholic vote, -partly to the desire for large armies -and severe competition between wage-earners, -so as to keep down wages. -In spite of the opposition of governments, -it seems probable that birth-control -will lead to a stationary population -in most white nations within the -next fifty years. There can be no -security that it will stop with a stationary -population; it may go on to the point -where the population diminishes.</p> - -<p>The increase in the practice of birth-control -is an example of a process -contrary to that seen in industrialism:<span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">45</span> -it represents a victory of individual -over collective passions. Collectively, -Frenchmen desire that France should -be populous, in order to be able to -defeat her enemies in war. Individually, -they desire that their own families -should be small, in order to increase -the inheritance of their children and to -diminish the expense of education. The -individual desire has triumphed over -the collective desire, and even, in many -cases, over religious scruples. In this -case, as in most others, the individual -desire is less harmful to the world than -the collective desire: the man who acts -from pure selfishness does less damage -than the man who is actuated by -“public spirit.” For, since medicine -and sanitation have diminished the -infant death-rate, the only checks to -over-population that remain (apart<span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">46</span> -from birth-control) are war and famine. -So long as this continues to be the case, -the world must either have a nearly -stationary population, or employ war -to produce famine. The latter method, -which is that favoured by opponents -of birth-control, has been adopted on a -large scale since 1914; it is however -somewhat wasteful. We require a -certain number of cattle and sheep, -and we take steps to secure the right -number. If we were as indifferent -about them as we are about human -beings, we should produce far too many, -and cause the surplus to die by the slow -misery of under-feeding. Farmers -would consider this plan extravagant, -and humanitarians would consider it -cruel. But where human beings are -concerned, it is considered the only -proper course, and works advocating<span class="pagenum" id="Page_47">47</span> -any other are confiscated by the police -if they are intelligible to those whom -they concern.</p> - -<p>It must be admitted, however, that -there are certain dangers. Before long -the population may actually diminish. -This is already happening in the most -intelligent sections of the most intelligent -nations; government opposition -to birth-control propaganda gives a -biological advantage to stupidity, since -it is chiefly stupid people whom governments -succeed in keeping in ignorance. -Before long, birth-control may become -nearly universal among the white -races; it will then not deteriorate -their quality, but only diminish their -numbers, at a time when uncivilized -races are still prolific and are preserved -from a high death-rate by white science.</p> - -<p>This situation will lead to a tendency—already<span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">48</span> -shown by the French—to -employ more prolific races as mercenaries. -Governments will oppose the -teaching of birth-control among Africans, -for fear of losing recruits. The -result will be an immense numerical -inferiority of the white races, leading -probably to their extermination in a -mutiny of mercenaries. If, however, a -world-government is established, it may -see the desirability of making subject -races also less prolific, and may permit -mankind to solve the population -question. This is another reason for -desiring a world-government.</p> - -<p>Passing from quantity to quality of -population, we come to the question of -eugenics. We may perhaps assume -that, if people grow less superstitious, -governments will acquire the right to -sterilize those who are not considered<span class="pagenum" id="Page_49">49</span> -desirable as parents. This power will -be used, at first, to diminish imbecility, -a most desirable object. But probably, -in time, opposition to the government -will be taken to prove imbecility, so -that rebels of all kinds will be sterilized. -Epileptics, consumptives, dipsomaniacs -and so on will gradually be included; -in the end, there will be a tendency to -include all who fail to pass the usual -school examinations. The result will -be to increase the average intelligence; -in the long run, it may be greatly increased. -But probably the effect upon -really exceptional intelligence will be -bad. Mr. Micawber, who was Dickens’s -father, would hardly have been regarded -as a desirable parent. How -many imbeciles ought to outweigh one -Dickens I do not profess to know.</p> - -<p>Eugenics has, of course, more ambitious<span class="pagenum" id="Page_50">50</span> -possibilities in a more distant -future. It may aim not only at -eliminating undesired types, but at -increasing desired types. Moral standards -may alter so as to make it -possible for one man to be the sire of a -vast progeny by many different mothers. -When men of science envisage a -possibility of this kind, they are prone -to a type of fallacy which is common -also in other directions. They imagine -that a reform inaugurated by men of -science would be administered as men -of science would wish, by men similar -in outlook to those who have advocated -it. In like manner women who advocated -votes for women used to imagine -that the woman voter of the -future would resemble the ardent -feminist who won her the vote; and -socialist leaders imagine that a socialist<span class="pagenum" id="Page_51">51</span> -State would be administered by idealistic -reformers like themselves. These -are, of course, delusions; a reform, -once achieved, is handed over to the -average citizen. So, if eugenics reached -the point where it could increase -desired types, it would not be the types -desired by present-day eugenists that -would be increased, but rather the -types desired by the average official. -Prime Ministers, Bishops, and others -whom the State considers desirable -might become the fathers of half the -next generation. Whether this would -be an improvement it is not for me to -say, as I have no hope of ever becoming -either a Bishop or a Prime Minister.</p> - -<p>If we knew enough about heredity -to determine, within limits, what sort -of population we would have, the -matter would of course be in the hands<span class="pagenum" id="Page_52">52</span> -of State officials, presumably elderly -medical men. Whether they would -really be preferable to Nature I do not -feel sure. I suspect that they would -breed a subservient population, convenient -to rulers but incapable of -initiative. However, it may be that I am -too sceptical of the wisdom of officials.</p> - -<p>The effects of psychology on practical -life may in time become very great. -Already advertisers in America employ -eminent psychologists to instruct them -in the technique of producing irrational -belief; such men may, when they have -grown more proficient, be very useful -in persuading the democracy that -governments are wise and good. Then, -again, there are the psychological tests -of intelligence, as applied to recruits for -the American army during the war. -I am very sceptical of the possibility of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">53</span> -testing anything except average intelligence -by such methods, and I think -that, if they were widely adopted, they -would probably lead to many persons -of great artistic capacity being classified -as morons. The same thing would have -happened to some first-rate mathematicians. -Specialized ability not infrequently -goes with general disability, -but this would not be shown by the -kind of tests which psychologists recommended -to the American government.</p> - -<p>More sensational than tests of intelligence -is the possibility of controlling -the emotional life through the secretions -of the ductless glands. It will be possible -to make people choleric or timid, strongly -or weakly sexed, and so on, as may be -desired. Differences of emotional disposition -seem to be chiefly due to secretions -of the ductless glands, and therefore<span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">54</span> -controllable by injections or by -increasing or diminishing the secretions. -Assuming an oligarchic organization of -society, the State could give to the -children of holders of power the disposition -required for command, and to -the children of the proletariat the -disposition required for obedience. -Against the injections of the State -physicians the most eloquent Socialist -oratory would be powerless. The only -difficulty would be to combine this -submissiveness with the necessary ferocity -against external enemies; but -I do not doubt that official science -would be equal to the task.</p> - -<p>It is not necessary, when we are -considering political consequences, to -pin our faith to the particular theories -of the ductless glands, which may blow -over, like other theories. All that is<span class="pagenum" id="Page_55">55</span> -essential in our hypothesis is the belief -that physiology will in time find ways -of controlling emotion, which it is -scarcely possible to doubt. When that -day comes, we shall have the emotions -desired by our rulers, and the chief -business of elementary education will -be to produce the desired disposition, -no longer by punishment or moral -precept, but by the far surer method -of injection or diet. The men who will -administer this system will have a -power beyond the dreams of the -Jesuits, but there is no reason to suppose -that they will have more sense than the -men who control education to-day. -Technical scientific knowledge does not -make men sensible in their aims, and -administrators in the future, will be -presumably no less stupid and no less -prejudiced than they are at present.</p> - -<hr /> - -<div id="toclink_57" class="chapter"> -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_57">57</span></p> - -<h2 class="nobreak" id="CONCLUSION">CONCLUSION</h2> -</div> - -<p>It may seem as though I had been at -once gloomy and frivolous in some of -my prognostications. I will end, however, -with the serious lesson which seems -to me to result. Men sometimes speak -as though the progress of science must -necessarily be a boon to mankind, but -that, I fear, is one of the comfortable -nineteenth-century delusions which our -more disillusioned age must discard. -Science enables the holders of power to -realize their purposes more fully than -they could otherwise do. If their -purposes are good, this is a gain; if -they are evil, it is a loss. In the present -age, it seems that the purposes of the -holders of power are in the main evil,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_58">58</span> -in the sense that they involve a diminution, -in the world at large, of the things -men are agreed in thinking good. -Therefore, at present, science does -harm by increasing the power of rulers. -Science is no substitute for virtue; the -heart is as necessary for a good life as -the head.</p> - -<p>If men were rational in their conduct, -that is to say, if they acted in the way -most likely to bring about the ends that -they deliberately desire, intelligence -would be enough to make the world -almost a paradise. In the main, what -is in the long run advantageous to one -man is also advantageous to another. -But men are actuated by passions which -distort their view; feeling an impulse -to injure others, they persuade themselves -that it is to their interest to do so. -They will not, therefore, act in the way<span class="pagenum" id="Page_59">59</span> -which is in fact to their own interest -unless they are actuated by generous -impulses which make them indifferent -to their own interest. This is why the -heart is as important as the head. By -the “heart” I mean, for the moment, -the sum-total of kindly impulses. Where -they exist, science helps them to be -effective; where they are absent, -science only makes men more cleverly -diabolic.</p> - -<p>It may be laid down as a general -principle to which there are few exceptions -that, when people are mistaken -as to what is to their own interest, the -course they believe to be wise is more -harmful to others than the course that -really is wise. There are innumerable -examples of men making fortunes -because, on moral grounds, they did -something which they believed to be<span class="pagenum" id="Page_60">60</span> -contrary to their own interests. For -instance, among early Quakers there -were a number of shopkeepers, who -adopted the practice of asking no more -for their goods than they were willing -to accept, instead of bargaining with -each customer, as everybody else did. -They adopted this practice because -they held it to be a lie to ask more than -they would take. But the convenience -to customers was so great that everybody -came to their shops and they grew -rich. (I forget where I read this, but -if my memory serves me it was in some -reliable source). The same policy <em>might</em> -have been adopted from shrewdness, -but in fact no one was sufficiently -shrewd. Our unconscious is more -malevolent than it pays us to be; -therefore the people who do most -completely what is in fact to their<span class="pagenum" id="Page_61">61</span> -interest are those who, on moral -grounds, do what they believe to be -against their interest.</p> - -<p>For this reason, it is of the greatest -importance to inquire whether any -method of strengthening kindly impulses -exists. I have no doubt that -their strength or weakness depends -upon discoverable physiological causes; -let us assume that it depends upon the -glands. If so, an international secret -society of physiologists could bring -about the millennium by kidnapping, -on a given day, all the rulers of the -world, and injecting into their blood -some substance which would fill them -with benevolence towards their fellow-creatures. -Suddenly M. Poincare would -wish well to Ruhr miners, Lord Curzon -to Indian nationalists, Mr. Smuts to -the natives of what was German South<span class="pagenum" id="Page_62">62</span> -West Africa, the American Government -to its political prisoners and its victims -in Ellis Island. But alas, the physiologists -would first have to administer the -love-philtre to themselves before they -would undertake such a task. Otherwise, -they would prefer to win titles -and fortunes by injecting military -ferocity into recruits. And so we come -back to the old dilemma: only kindliness -can save the world, and even if we -knew how to produce kindliness we -should not do so unless we were already -kindly. Failing that, it seems that the -solution which the Houynhnms adopted -towards the Yahoos, namely extermination, -is the only one; apparently the -Yahoos are bent on applying it to each -other.</p> - -<p>We may sum up this discussion in a -few words. Science has not given men<span class="pagenum" id="Page_63">63</span> -more self-control, more kindliness, or -more power of discounting their passions -in deciding upon a course of action. -It has given communities more power -to indulge their collective passions, -but, by making society more organic, -it has diminished the part played by -private passions. Men’s collective -passions are mainly evil; far the -strongest of them are hatred and -rivalry directed towards other groups. -Therefore at present all that gives men -power to indulge their collective -passions is bad. That is why science -threatens to cause the destruction of -our civilization. The only solid hope -seems to lie in the possibility of world-wide -domination by one group, say the -United States, leading to the gradual -formation of an orderly economic and -political world-government. But<span class="pagenum" id="Page_64">64</span> -perhaps, in view of the sterility of the -Roman Empire, the collapse of our -civilization would in the end be -preferable to this alternative.</p> - -<div class="chapter"><div class="transnote"> -<h2 class="nobreak" id="Transcribers_Notes">Transcriber’s Notes</h2> - -<p>Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made -consistent when a predominant preference was found -in the original book; otherwise they were not changed.</p> - -<p>Simple typographical errors were corrected; unbalanced -quotation marks were remedied when the change was -obvious, and otherwise left unbalanced.</p> - -<p>Table of Contents added by Transcriber.</p> -</div></div> - -<div style='display:block; margin-top:4em'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ICARUS ***</div> -<div style='text-align:left'> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will -be renamed. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright -law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, -so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United -States without permission and without paying copyright -royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part -of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project -Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ -concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, -and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following -the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use -of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for -copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very -easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation -of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project -Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may -do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected -by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark -license, especially commercial redistribution. -</div> - -<div style='margin:0.83em 0; font-size:1.1em; text-align:center'>START: FULL LICENSE<br /> -<span style='font-size:smaller'>THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE<br /> -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK</span> -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project -Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full -Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at -www.gutenberg.org/license. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or -destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your -possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a -Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound -by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person -or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this -agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ -electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the -Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection -of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual -works in the collection are in the public domain in the United -States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the -United States and you are located in the United States, we do not -claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, -displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as -all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope -that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting -free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ -works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the -Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily -comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the -same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when -you share it without charge with others. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are -in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, -check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this -agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, -distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any -other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no -representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any -country other than the United States. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other -immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear -prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work -on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the -phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, -performed, viewed, copied or distributed: -</div> - -<blockquote> - <div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> - This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most - other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions - whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms - of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online - at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you - are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws - of the country where you are located before using this eBook. - </div> -</blockquote> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is -derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not -contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the -copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in -the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are -redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project -Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply -either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or -obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ -trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any -additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms -will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works -posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the -beginning of this work. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg™ License. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including -any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access -to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format -other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official -version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website -(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense -to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means -of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain -Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the -full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works -provided that: -</div> - -<div style='margin-left:0.7em;'> - <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> - • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed - to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has - agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid - within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are - legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty - payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in - Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg - Literary Archive Foundation.” - </div> - - <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> - • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ - License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all - copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue - all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ - works. - </div> - - <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> - • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of - any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of - receipt of the work. - </div> - - <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'> - • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works. - </div> -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project -Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than -are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing -from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of -the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set -forth in Section 3 below. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project -Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ -electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may -contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate -or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other -intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or -other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or -cannot be read by your equipment. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right -of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium -with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you -with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in -lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person -or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second -opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If -the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing -without further opportunities to fix the problem. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO -OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT -LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of -damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement -violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the -agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or -limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or -unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the -remaining provisions. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in -accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the -production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ -electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, -including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of -the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this -or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or -additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any -Defect you cause. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™ -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of -computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It -exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations -from people in all walks of life. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future -generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see -Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by -U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, -Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up -to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website -and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact -</div> - -<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread -public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND -DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state -visit <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/donate/">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a>. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To -donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate -</div> - -<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'> -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project -Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be -freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and -distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of -volunteer support. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in -the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not -necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper -edition. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -Most people start at our website which has the main PG search -facility: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. -</div> - -<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'> -This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. -</div> - -</div> - -</body> -</html> diff --git a/old/66225-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/66225-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index cce19f3..0000000 --- a/old/66225-h/images/cover.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/66225-h/images/i_001.png b/old/66225-h/images/i_001.png Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 889e4de..0000000 --- a/old/66225-h/images/i_001.png +++ /dev/null |
