summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/66046-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/66046-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/66046-0.txt1351
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1351 deletions
diff --git a/old/66046-0.txt b/old/66046-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index e867918..0000000
--- a/old/66046-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,1351 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg eBook of Søren Hjorth, by Sigurd Smith
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
-will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before
-using this eBook.
-
-Title: Søren Hjorth
- Inventor of the Dynamo-electric Principle
-
-Author: Sigurd Smith
-
-Translator: F. Sodemann
-
-Release Date: August 11, 2021 [eBook #66046]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-Produced by: Charlene Taylor, Craig Kirkwood, and the Online Distributed
- Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was
- produced from images generously made available by The Internet
- Archive/American Libraries.)
-
-*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SØREN HJORTH ***
-
-Transcriber’s Notes:
-
-Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_).
-
-The whole number part of a mixed fraction is separated from the
-fractional part with -, for example, 2-1/2.
-
-Additional Transcriber’s Notes are at the end.
-
- * * * * *
-
-SØREN HJORTH
-
-
-
-
-SØREN HJORTH
-
-
- INVENTOR OF THE
- DYNAMO-ELECTRIC PRINCIPLE
-
- BY
-
- SIGURD SMITH
- C. E., M. I. F.
-
- PUBLISHED BY »ELEKTROTEKNISK FORENING« AT THE
- EXPENSE OF THE CARLSBERG FOUNDATION
-
- KØBENHAVN
- PRINTED BY J. JORGENSEN & CO. (M. A. HANNOVER)
- 1912
-
- * * * * *
-
-This pamphlet is published simultaneously in English and in Danish, and
-is distributed among interested institutions all over the world.
-
-Translated by F. SODEMANN, C. E., M. I. F.
-
- * * * * *
-
-[Illustration]
-
- _Handsworth, Birmingham,
- Feb. 6th, 1851._
-
-... After this wonderful force has been discovered by Your Excellency,
-it has been my pride and interest that also the utilization thereof
-should be originated by a Dane....
-
- (_Fragment of a letter from Hjorth
- to H. C. Ørsted._)
-
-
-
-
-PREFACE.
-
-
-Since the Life and Works of Søren Hjorth, the Dane was published in
-the Danish technical journal the »Elektroteknikeren«, in 1907, a
-statement concerning Hjorth’s rights of priority to the invention
-of the dynamo-electric principle has been sent to the leading
-foreign technical periodicals, viz. »Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift«,
-»L’éclairage électrique«, and »Electrical Engineering«. As this
-statement still stands uncontradicted, it seems reasonable to
-consider Hjorth’s priority rights to this principle to be generally
-acknowledged, even in the great centres of civilization. Therefore
-I highly appreciated the courtesy of Mr. Hjorth’s heirs, after the
-death of his step-daughter, Miss D. Ancker, in the autumn of 1908, in
-offering me an opportunity to peruse the large collection of letters,
-rough-copies, drawings, and sketch-books left by Hjorth, which threw
-new light on his interesting life and work. Where it was previously
-necessary to resort to guesswork alone, we are now able to base our
-statements on established facts and to follow Hjorth’s train of ideas
-almost from his first, to his last invention, and to see where he has
-right and where he failed.
-
-In the following pages, an account will be given of the results of
-these recent researches in connection with what was previously known
-about Hjorth.
-
- Charlottenlund 1911.
-
- _Sigurd Smith._
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS.
-
-
- Page
-
- Preface.
-
- Søren Hjorth:
-
- Childhood and Youth 1
-
- The Railway 4
-
- Electricity 7
-
- Hard Times 18
-
- Sources 29
-
- * * * * *
-
-SØREN HJORTH.
-
-
-
-
-Childhood and Youth.
-
-
-Søren Hjorth was born on the 13th of October, 1801. He spent his
-childhood at Vesterbygaard, an estate rented by his father, Jens
-Hjorth, in Jordløse Parish, north of Tissø. His mother’s maiden name
-was Margrethe Lassen. Of their numerous children only two, besides
-Søren, survived childhood.
-
-The parents became early aware that their son possessed great
-mechanical genius. He received his first education from the parish
-school-master. After Hjorth was confirmed, his father leased the
-beautiful estate Dragsholm, in Odsherred County, where he remained for
-many years, and after the death of his first wife, he married baroness
-Zytphen-Adeler.
-
-Though he did not have an opportunity of learning much in his
-childhood, Hjorth succeeded in his youth in passing an examination
-which admitted him to the Bar. Later on he became the steward of
-Bonderup Estate, near Korsør, but in this position he did not feel
-satisfied, and in 1828 he became a volunteer in the State Treasury,
-in Copenhagen. In 1836, he advanced to the position of Clerk of the
-Exchequer and secretary. Although Hjorth’s occupation, during the last
-30 years of his life, was mainly that of a civil engineer, he always
-continued to be addressed as Secretary Hjorth, and by this title he is
-still remembered by some of his surviving contemporaries.
-
-Hjorth’s interests while at the Treasury were not concentrated solely
-on his work there. Mechanical problems always fascinated him. It is
-told that, during this period, he made all kinds of experiments at
-Dragsholm, and, among other things, he constructed a thrashing-machine.
-In 1832 he constructed a rotary steam-engine, which was made by
-Schiødt, a mechanic residing at St. Annae Plads, and, upon Hjorth’s
-application, it was bought by the King for 500 rixdollars in notes.
-The King donated it to the newly founded Polytechnic Institute, this
-being the place where it might best be utilized and »where this
-original domestic invention might most suitably be placed«. The same
-year, Hjorth described in »Ursin’s Magazines for Artists and Artisans«
-a steam-car, invented by him and adapted to be propelled by means of
-the rotary steam-engine. So Hjorth once more made a petition to the
-Government for a subvention of 2000 to 2500 rixdollars to assist in the
-practical manufacture of this car. The decision on this application
-was postponed, however, at the suggestion of Professors Ørsted, Zeiss
-and Forchhammer, because Hjorth had not yet finished the installation
-of the boiler for the first steam-engine at the Polytechnic Institute.
-Hjorth did not succeed in making the engine work, as it was not made
-with sufficient accuracy. The sum for which the car was to be made, was
-never granted, as petitioned for, although Hjorth had given up using
-his rotary engine for it; and the car itself was probably never built.
-
-At that time, the use of steam-cars on the country roads attracted
-great attention in England, and many different constructions appeared.
-In 1834 Hjorth, aided by subventions from the »Rejersen Foundation« and
-the Government, went to England, in order to acquaint himself with the
-use of these steam-cars on high-roads and railroads. During these years
-he very actively investigated the use of steam-power, especially as a
-means of propulsion for vehicles and ships. With admirable interest
-and diligence he studied the steam propelled road-carriage, and for
-a long time he considered that to be the future means of conveyance.
-Although he did not succeed in getting his own steam-carriage put to
-practical use, he made many experiments on a steam car, and I am told
-by one of his passengers that on the level streets of Copenhagen and
-Frederiksberg all went very well, but the carriage could not climb
-Valby hill.
-
-During these years, Hjorth also attended the lectures at the
-Polytechnic Institute, and he was especially interested in Ørsted’s
-lectures on the physics of the globe, and on electricity and magnetism.
-
-Notwithstanding his unsuccessful experiments with the rotary
-steam-engine, Professors Ørsted, Zeiss and Forchhammer had to give
-him a warm recommendation, when he made a petition to the Ministry in
-order to get his expenses refunded by the Government. They mentioned
-his indefatigable zeal, his great diligence, and the considerable
-expense borne by him in the pursuit of his researches. The numerous and
-expensive experiments absorbed all the money Hjorth could procure: not
-only his salary was spent, but also such funds as he was able to raise
-among his friends.
-
-
-
-
-The Railway.
-
-
-In 1839 Hjorth made a journey to England, France and Belgium. By that
-time, he seems to have come to the conclusion that steam-carriages
-running on rails, are preferable to steam-carriages running on the
-high-road, at any rate he mainly studied locomotives and railroading
-during this journey.
-
-After his return to Denmark, he spent some years as manager of
-Marschall’s piano factory, though still at work with his railroad
-schemes, and in 1840 he happened to find a man named Schram, a
-book-keeper, who shared his interests and was able to assist him in the
-realisation of his ideas. In 1840, these two men published a detailed
-calculation of the probable revenues and expenses of a railroad between
-Copenhagen and Roskilde. This project, however, did not arouse any
-interest, and people were mostly inclined to smile at the idea, and it
-appeared impossible to induce competent men to take, any interest in the
-scheme, much less to invest money therein.
-
-Then, in 1841, they applied to the young »Industrial Association« which
-body referred the case to its special committee of commerce. Even this
-committee did not seem much inclined to listen to Hjorth’s and Schram’s
-proposition, but their undefatigable energy finally succeeded in
-persuading the committee of commerce to convoke a large meeting to be
-held on the 24th of March. Here it was decided to make an application
-to the Government for the surveying of the proposed railroad line and,
-to the surprise of many, the petition was granted. Hjorth, possessing
-distinctive agitatory faculties, showed great activity, delivering
-lectures and exhibiting models, and tried thereby to excite interest
-in his schemes. His contemporaries describe him as a sociable man of
-a winning and lovable disposition and possessing a certain persuasive
-power. He was well liked by his friends as well as by his many casual
-acquaintances. In 1841 both Hjorth and Schram were elected members
-of the Board of Representatives of the Industrial Association, and
-from 1841 to 1843 Hjorth was the vice-president of the association.
-Now there began to be some sympathy for their cause, and the Board of
-Representatives of the Industrial Association showed a willingness to
-follow the sub-committee elected, consisting of the two motionists and
-Lector, (later Professor) Wilkens of the Polytechnic Institute. The
-strenuous efforts of this sub-committee resulted in the Industrial
-Association submitting, in January 1843, an application for a franchise
-to form a stock-company for the purpose of building a railroad from
-Copenhagen, by way of Roskilde, to a sea-port on the western coast of
-Sealand. This franchise, was granted, for a period of 100 years, and
-on the 16th of April 1844 the Industrial Association issued a public
-invitation to take stock in a company whose stock capital was to be
-1-1/2 million rixdollars, a very considerable sum for those times. As
-early as in the beginning of May, most of the stock was taken--mainly
-in Hamburg. While the confidence in a scheme of this kind was but
-slight in Denmark, the speculation in railroad stocks was nearly
-culminating at the stock-exchanges of Germany and England; as a matter
-of fact, it became near being a swindle. The Sealand Railroad Company
-was founded on the 2nd of July 1844, and Hjorth became its first
-technical director, while Schram became its first general manager. The
-Industrial Association received 15000 rixdollars for the franchise,
-and from this sum it paid 3000 to Hjorth and Schram.
-
-In 1843, Hjorth was unanimously elected president of the Industrial
-Association. In 1845, he had to resign this office, but as it appeared
-very difficult to concentrate the votes in favour of a new president
-and vice-president, »Secretary Hjorth, to meet the general demand,
-accepted the vice-presidency«, which office he then held for a year.
-
-In the meantime, the railroad company had finished the construction
-of its first piece of road, from Copenhagen to Roskilde, and this was
-opened for traffic on the 27th of June 1847, some days before the
-time limit fixed. Even at that time it was decided, owing to Hjorth’s
-influence, to extend the road to Korsør. The cause of the delay in
-commencing this work was the railroad crisis which had just broken out
-in Germany and England, making it impossible to obtain money for the
-construction of railroads. This road, therefore, was not constructed
-until the government, in 1852, guaranteed an interest of 4% on the
-capital invested.
-
-Hjorth retained his position for about 4 years, and concerning this
-period he writes: »All the great difficulties and obstacles to be
-surmounted during the construction of the road influenced my health to
-such a degree that I broke down and was forced to abandon my position
-as technical director of the railroad before the expiration of my term
-of office, in order that I might take a water-cure at Klampenborg«.
-After he had, to some extent, regained his health there, and another
-board of directors had been elected, he made a travel to England which
-turned out to be of such great importance that we will describe it more
-fully in the following.
-
-
-
-
-Electricity.
-
-
-After Faraday, in 1831, had discovered how an electric current might be
-produced by means of a magnet, many people busied themselves by trying
-to put this invention into practical use, and numerous attempts were
-made to construct electro-magnetic and magneto-electric machines for
-useful purposes.
-
-No wonder that these efforts attracted Hjorth’s attention, and, as
-early as 1842, he had drafted an electro-magnetic machine, consisting
-of a stationary circle of magnets, whose poles were directed against
-the poles of a moveable circle of magnets. In 1843 this sketch was
-deposited with the Royal Scientific Society, but the sketch itself, as
-well as the explanation belonging to it, are very incomplete.
-
-In the month of April, 1848, Hjorth made a petition to the government
-for a subvention of 200 rixdollars, in order that he might go to
-England to get an electro-magnetic machine[1] designed by him, made
-there. Hjorth had noticed that, in a piece of iron encircled by
-an electric current, the magnetism only to a certain extent would
-increase, with the strength of current, there being a point of
-saturation for the iron. When this point has been reached, it will be
-of no use to increase the intensity of the current, since the magnetism
-will not increase any further. On the basis of this observation, Hjorth
-had constructed his machine, but he had confided the details thereof
-only to Professors Ørsted and Forchhammer. In the report on Hjorth’s
-petition made by these two professors to the Board of Trade, they,
-curiously enough, take exception to the above-mentioned observation
-by Hjorth, while its correctness will now be acknowledged by any
-electrician. These professors, however, advised that Hjorth’s petition
-should be granted, using this liberal argument, worded by Ørsted:
-»Regarding the petitioner’s new electro-magnetic machine, we must state
-that we find it quite ingenious, and although we are not convinced
-that it will produce remarkable effects, we should consider it useful
-to have a working model executed. Having during so many years worked
-for this case, the petitioner might perhaps, by the execution of such
-a model, be enabled to make some further invention, which would bring
-him nearer to the goal. Indefatigable zeal has often accomplished its
-purpose, where science had to declare the means at first used, to be
-entirely inadequate, but where, by continued work, entirely different
-means, previously unknown to the inventor, were found. Inasmuch as the
-sum of 200 rixdollars asked for is so small, we find it advisable to
-grant the subvention. Still we cannot refrain from remarking that the
-petitioner’s machine may just as well be made here as at any other
-place«.
-
-Thus the discoverer of electro-magnetism cleared the road which was
-to lead to the most beautiful application of electro-magnetism, that
-application which, before all others, has been of radically reforming
-importance during the last half century, thereby throwing double
-splendor on Ørsted’s name.
-
-Soon after his arrival at London, in the summer of 1848, through a
-firm which he knew from an earlier period of his life, Hjorth made
-the acquaintance of a nephew of Bramah, the renowned mechanician and
-inventor of the Bramah-lock. Hjorth’s invention was then laid before a
-friend of Bramah’s, a civil engineer named Gregory, who had made the
-study of magnetism his specialty. Gregory at once persuaded Bramah
-to bear the expense of making a machine, and of securing patents in
-England and several other countries, on condition that the expected
-profits should be divided between him and Hjorth. Later on, B. Taylor
-and Normann Innis were taken in as partners, paying together £1000, and
-then Charles Stovin (£600) and Robert Broad, of the Henley Iron Works
-(£500). Two machines were now made, according to Hjorth’s directions,
-by the firm of Robinson & Sons, Pimlico, London. One of these is
-shown in Fig. 1, and is apparently quite an ingenious imitation
-of the steam-engines of those days. _C_ is a movable, _A_ a fixed
-electro-magnet. Their peculiar shape, involving several conical pins
-fitting into corresponding cavities, was thought to be advantageous for
-the distribution of the effect of the magnetic force over a longer
-stroke. The »piston« _C_, reciprocating up and down, drives a crank
-shaft having two opposite cranks. To either of the cranks there is a
-corresponding group of magnets. An eccentric fixed on the shaft, moves
-a »slide valve«, alternately closing the circuit of one or the other
-of the two groups of magnets. When the one piston is at its lowest
-position, the circuit of the other group of magnets is closed, and
-its piston is attracted, until it reaches its bottom position; then
-the current is shifted, and the other piston attracted, etc. In order
-to avoid the formation of sparks at the circuit breaker, an ingenious
-device was provided, closing the current of one group of magnets,
-immediately before that of the other one was broken. The first machine
-was made with a 4 inch stroke, the next one with 13-1/2 inch stroke.
-The magnetic attraction per square inch of the piston, had about the
-same magnitude as the pressure per square inch in the low pressure
-steam-engines of those days. The patent application was filed in London
-as early as in October 1848, and it was granted on the 26th of April
-1849[2]. On the 21st of September, the same year, Hjorth obtained
-a fifteen year monopoly in the kingdom of Denmark, to manufacture
-machines, utilizing electro-magnetism as motive power in the above
-described manner.
-
-[Illustration: Fig. 1. Hjorth’s Electromotor.]
-
-The larger of the machines here referred to was shown in action
-to several technical experts, and created considerable sensation,
-especially on account of the great length of stroke attained--13-1/2
-inches--and the uniform motion of the machine. The machine is mentioned
-in »Mining Journal«, for the 5th of May, and 16th of June 1849, and an
-extract of these articles is published in the »Flyveposten« for the 3rd
-of July the same year.
-
-Hjorth was invited to show the machine at the Royal Society, and at
-the annual meeting of the Society of Civil Engineers, of which he was
-a member. It was exhibited at the Universal Exhibition in London, in
-1851. In the catalogue it was highly commended, and it received the
-only prize-medal awarded to electrical machines.
-
-There was, however, one essential obstacle to the practical use of this
-machine, namely the lack of means for cheaply producing electricity
-in the quantities required by the electromotor. Wet batteries were
-expensive to use, and if the machine were to become useful in practice,
-a powerful »dry battery« would be a necessity. Most of the then known
-machines producing electricity, were fitted with permanent steel
-magnets, and as the point of magnetic saturation of steel is low,
-these machines were unable to produce any considerable quantities
-of electric energy. Hjorth therefore imposed upon himself the task
-of building a dry battery. His sketch-book from 1851 is full of new
-schemes for such batteries and improvements on those already existing
-(Woolrich’s, Elkington’s and Paine’s). From this it appears, among
-other things, that he was fully aware that, when the spools suddenly
-entered or left the field, difficulties would arise in the commutation,
-and he therefore improved the machine by bending the field magnets,
-obtaining thereby a gradually increasing and decreasing field, the
-same thing which is, nowadays, attained by using pointed or obliquely
-cut pole-shoes.--It would be very tempting to study more closely these
-sketch-books with their neatly colored drawings, showing how many
-different ideas have been fostered by him, before the actual production
-of the first dynamo, in 1854. Most of the descriptions and notes have
-been written in the English language, which he used almost as readily
-as his native tongue. On the 1st of May, 1851, Hjorth writes in his
-sketch-book, beside a sketch of a machine having copper discs for
-armature conductors and cast iron electro-magnets: »_By passing the
-current on the said way round the Electromagnets, these will of course
-be excited in proportion to the strength of the same, and the more they
-are excited, the more will the discs be influenced by the magnets, a
-mutual action thus taking place_«.
-
-So it appears that Hjorth, as early as on the 1st of May 1851, with
-perfect clearness, has pronounced the dynamo-electric principle.
-
-Under the date of June 24th, 1851, we find sketched out another
-beautiful idea for the construction of a dynamo. It must be regretted
-that this machine has not been executed, as it would certainly have
-proved superior to his dynamo of 1855, which has many points in common
-with this project. Fig. 2 shows a reproduction of this page of the
-sketch-book. There is no descriptive text to this sketch, only at
-one side of the drawing, these very significant words are written:
-»Magneto-Electric arrangement with mutual action«. All the six
-powerful held magnets are of cast iron, and they are wound so as to be
-magnetized by the current, produced by the dynamo itself[3].
-
-[Illustration: Fig 2. Facsimile of a Page of Hjorth’s Sketch Book, June
-24th 1851.]
-
-In November, 1851, Hjorth returned to Copenhagen, and here he continued
-what he had commenced in England. In May, 1852, he deposited with the
-»Society of Sciences« some papers, signed by Professors Scharling and
-Forchhammer in December, 1851. These papers contain two descriptions,
-written in English, and two drawings of »dry batteries«. These consist
-of 3 or 4 circular rows of vertical steel rod magnets, placed one
-above the other, and disposed round a vertical shaft, carrying 2 or 3
-circular rows of armatures. Each armature consists of a piece of soft
-iron, and is wound with a strip of copper, in a special manner. There
-are, in each row, as many armatures as magnets. The hollow shaft, as
-well as the magnets, which are fitted with shoes of soft iron, are
-wound, and encircled by the current produced in the armatures. With
-regard to the magnetic arrangement, this machine comes very near to the
-one patented by Brett in 1848, and it will be noticed that it cannot
-be said to be constructed according to the dynamo principle, as the
-»mutual« action plays no important part, the magnets being permanent
-steel magnets, hardly adapted to receive much extra magnetism by the
-current of the machine. Hjorth points out, as the novel feature of
-these machines, the division of the steel magnets into many small ones,
-with an armature corresponding to each magnet. Hereby he claims, for
-the same weight of the steel magnets, a larger capacity of the machine
-than if he had used fewer, but larger steel magnets[4]. The machine
-is fitted with a commutator for direct current.--In March, 1854, the
-sketch-book contains another sketch of a dynamo, with clear indication
-of the dynamo principle, approximately as it was patented on the 14th
-of October the same year[5]. This sketch is reproduced in Fig. 3. The
-machine has two permanent cast iron magnets and two electro-magnets.
-The armature cores are fitted with oblique pole-shoes. The description
-is very brief and contains the same as the patent specification.
-
-[Illustration: Fig. 3. Facsimile of a Page of Hjorth’s Sketch Book,
-March 1854.]
-
-In 1853 Hjorth negotiated with a certain Dr. Watson, who had
-constructed a »dry battery« by means of which Hjorth had meant to drive
-his electro-magnetic machine. The object of their negotiations was
-to buy out Hjorth’s above-named partners, and to form a new company
-for the purpose of exploiting the above-mentioned two machines. The
-partnership, however, was not realized, and in spring of 1854, Hjorth
-himself commenced to have a 3 HP battery built in Copenhagen. The
-machine was fitted with cast iron magnets, and in all probability it
-was similar to the project of March 1854, and agreed with the patent of
-October, the same year.
-
-This patent specification reads as follows: »The main feature of this
-battery consists in applying one, two, or several permanent magnets
-_A_, of cast iron, and shaped as shewn in the drawing (Figs. 4 and 5),
-in connection with an equal number or more electro-magnets _B_, shaped
-as indicated in drawing, in such a manner _that the currents induced
-in the coils of the revolving armatures are allowed to pass round the
-electro-magnets; consequently, the more the electro-magnets are excited
-in the said manner, the more will the armatures C be excited, and
-the more electricity of course induced in the respective coilings_;
-and while a mutual and accelerating force is produced in this manner
-between the electro-magnets and the armatures, an additional or
-secondary current is at the same time induced in the coiling of the
-electro-magnets by the motion of the armatures, the said current
-flowing in the same direction as that of the primary current, after
-having passed the commutator. The direction of the current induced
-in the coils of the armatures will, of course, be reversed according
-to the change of the respective polarities, and the commutator _D_
-is therefore applied for the purpose of causing the current to flow
-constantly in one direction«. Then follows a description of the
-commutator of the dynamo. Finally the pole-shoes, or false poles,
-provided on the magnets as well as on the armatures, are mentioned. He
-points out that the false poles have on the side of attraction, a long
-straight edge, as distant from the centre as possible, while on the
-side of separation, either one has a sharp point, nearer to the axis
-of revolution, »all with a view to avoid reactionary currents, and at
-the same time to facilitate the motion of the armature«. »While steel
-magnets also may be applied instead of cast-iron magnets, the permanent
-magnets may be coiled like the electro-magnets, which also will serve
-to make them more permanent«.
-
-[Illustration: Fig. 4. Hjorth’s Dynamo 1854.]
-
-[Illustration: Fig. 5. Hjorth’s Dynamo 1854. Fragment of the Patent
-Drawing.]
-
-From the above-named sketch-book notations, and the patent
-specification, it will be seen that Hjorth, during the years 1851-54,
-has repeatedly pronounced the dynamo principle with perfect clearness,
-and that he has utilized it in several projects.
-
-It is worth noting that Hjorth’s so-called »permanent« magnets
-are of cast iron. This shows that Hjorth has known of remanence,
-or permanence. He has known that cast iron always possesses some
-slight magnetism, either induced by the earth magnetism or as a
-remnant--remnant magnetism--left over from its being magnetized in a
-coil. It has heretofore been assumed that Siemens was the first to call
-attention to this property of iron, in his paper in the transactions
-of the Royal Society, of the 14th of February, 1867.--Thus Hjorth
-used this weak remanent magnetism in the large cast iron magnets
-to produce the initial current in the dynamo, which then excites
-itself.--At the end of the patent specification, Hjorth points out that
-the remanent magnets may also be coiled (compare Fig. 2), and thereby
-he comes closer to the later dynamo constructions.
-
-Hjorth is quite right, according to the patent specification, in
-giving the pole-shoes such a shape that the armature is gradually
-demagnetized, and in stating that the object of this is thereby to
-avoid reactionary currents, and consequently the formation of sparks;
-while he is mistaken in believing to be able to facilitate the motion
-of the armature by giving the pole-shoes a certain special shape,
-because in that case, the machine would be a _perpetuum mobile_.
-
-Together with the above-mentioned dynamo, Hjorth had an electromotor
-made in Copenhagen, essentially similar to the one exhibited in 1851.
-When in the autumn 1854 the machines were finished, Hjorth was called
-back to England, in order to continue the work on his inventions.
-It is not known whether the machines were sent to England or not;
-at any rate they aroused some interest there, and he had a new and
-larger dynamo built by Messrs Malcolm & Campbell; of Liverpool, 7
-India Buildings, at the expense of Malcolm and others. This machine
-was patented in 1855[6], and is shown in Fig. 6, which is reproduced
-from a photograph. Here, too, the dynamo principle has been followed,
-but each electro-magnet is composed of one solid and one tubular
-electro-magnet, the latter enclosing the former, the two together
-forming a so-called »_cup magnet_«, a construction which has also been
-used by later inventors. Hjorth describes the action of the battery as
-follows: »_The permanent magnets acting on the armatures, brought in
-succession between their poles, induce a current in the coils of the
-armatures, which current, after having been caused by the commutator
-to flow in one direction, passes round the electro-magnets, charging
-the same and acting on the armatures. By the mutual action between the
-electro-magnets and the armatures, an accelerating force is obtained,
-which in the result produces electricity greater in quantity and
-intensity than has heretofore been obtained by any similar means._« At
-the same time, Hjorth allowed the dynamo patent of 1854 to lapse, it
-being merely a provisional patent.
-
-[Illustration: Fig. 6. Hjorth’s Dynamo 1855, from an old Photograph.]
-
-Together with the dynamo patent of 1854, Hjorth secured a provisional
-patent on an improved electromotor[7], and together with the dynamo
-patent of 1855, he obtained the complete patent on the above mentioned
-electromotor, as well as on another construction thereof[8]. The former
-consisted of hollow, horizontal electro-magnets (cylinders), being of
-a special shape inside, adapting them to give to an electro-magnetic
-piston, reciprocating within them, a long and steady stroke. By means
-of a crank, the stroke was transformed into a rotary motion. The
-other electro-motor consisted of wheels, with protruding teeth, which
-were set in rotary motion by the teeth being attracted into hollow
-electro-magnets.
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[1] According to the usual terminology of those times, an
-»electro-magnetic« machine means a machine driven by electricity, an
-electromotor, while, on the other hand, a »magneto electric battery«,
-or a »dry battery« is a machine for producing electricity.
-
-[2] Specification of Patent No. 12295, 1848.
-
-[3] After the publication of my first treatise in the
-»Elektroteknikeren«, for February 1907, various parties have objected
-that Hjorth, in his dynamos, did not use the dynamo principle in
-its purest form, as he had one large, unwound, cast iron magnet.
-On the contrary, the above-mentioned leaf of his sketch-book shows
-that Hjorth, as early as in 1851, has used the dynamo principle in
-its purest from--exactly the same as used by Siemens in 1867--as all
-the field magnets have been wound cast iron magnets, and the initial
-current is induced by the remnant magnetism of these magnets. _S. S._
-
-[4] This is correct, as long as he uses armatures with but a single
-winding, because, in that case, the number of armature windings
-is proportional to the number of steel magnets. Whereas Hjorth is
-mistaken, when in 1867 he makes the same statement about a machine,
-where nothing prevents the armature from being fitted with a great
-number of windings.
-
-[5] Specification of Patent No. 2198, 1854.
-
-[6] Specification of Patent No. 806, 1855.
-
-[7] Specification of Patent No. 2199, 1854.
-
-[8] Specifications of Patents No. 807 and 808, 1855.
-
-
-
-
-Hard Times.
-
-
-In May, 1856, Hjorth returned from England, disappointed. It will be
-noted that through the electro-motor Hjorth was led to occupy himself
-with the dynamo machine. The dynamo was built in order to produce
-motive power for the motor. All the time he was working on these two
-inventions, it was his firm belief that if he could make the dynamo
-drive the electro-motor, he would be able to attain a substantial
-saving in power, get much more power out of the electro-motor than was
-consumed in driving the dynamo. The machines would, as it were, run
-automatically. He could not understand, why Dr. Watson was sceptical
-with regard to this manner of battery action. He intended to install
-his machines in ships and locomotives, which would then be propelled
-with a minimum consumption of power. In short, the combination of
-dynamo and electro-motor imagined by Hjorth was to be a _perpetuum
-mobile_. It has certainly been the great disappointment of his journey
-to England, that this scheme failed.
-
-On reading about this mistake, one is inclined to base the judgment
-of Hjorth upon assumptions belonging to the present time. But this
-would be a great injustice to him. The axiom that the quantity of
-energy in nature is unalterable, and consequently a _perpetuum mobile_
-an impossibility, has, as it were, been imbued by our own generation
-with the mother’s milk. Not so with Hjorth. Not until the forties of
-the last century, did Mayer, Joule and Colding, the City Engineer of
-Copenhagen, set forth their theories about the permanency of energy,
-and about the convertibility of heat into mechanical activity, and
-of the latter into heat again. These theories, however, were very
-slowly accepted, even by scientists. It is, therefore, no wonder that
-a man like Hjorth, having no special scientific training, could not
-easily digest the new theory and Hjorth did not have any instinctive
-sensation of having entered upon a hopeless and impossible track. On
-the contrary, he imagined the new wonderful form of energy to conceal
-unestimable possibilities which he had only to wrest from nature.
-
-Though Hjorth was thus ship-wrecked on his favourite idea, he
-nevertheless discovered new land, fertile for coming generations. His
-intrepid zeal guided him, as Ørsted had anticipated, in spite of his
-lack of scientific education, on to the road leading to the splendid
-results of this day.
-
-None of Hjorth’s original partners participated in the manufacture of
-his latest machines, and possibly this was due to his above-mentioned
-erroneous idea. Only one of his English friends, Wm. Macredie, of
-Melbourne, maintained his attachment to Hjorth and his confidence in
-him to the last. He was always very interested in Hjorth’s schemes,
-and, besides, he shared his religious creed.
-
-Hjorth was very anxious as to his future. When he returned from
-England, he stood quite destitute and felt depressed by poverty. His
-health was not of the best, and his formerly so neat hand-writing had
-become unsteady. He received, shortly after his return, a communication
-from his English partners that they wished to have the dynamo patented
-in Denmark and France, which showed that they had faith in this
-machine, but nevertheless these were hard times for Hjorth.
-
-The dynamo remained for some time with Malcolm, in Liverpool, and
-negotiations for its sale were several times entered into, but were
-without results. It was tested on several occasions, but these tests
-proved that it could not yield as much as might be expected from
-its size. The uncoiled magnets, which were originally of cast iron,
-were replaced by more powerful steel magnets. Upon the whole, this
-dynamo had a rather eventful existence, for first every other magnet
-pole was removed (see Fig. 6), and then it was proposed to rewind the
-magnets. In May, 1857, it was donated to the Polytechnic Institute,
-Regent Street, in London. Among the papers left by Hjorth, there are
-a daguerreotype and a photograph of this machine, (from which the
-accompanying Fig. 6 is reproduced).
-
-Notwithstanding a thorough search of the London museums, it has been
-impossible to trace this machine, which is said to have been seen in
-London during the nineties.
-
-Hjorth was now compelled to find a new means of earning his livelihood,
-and to make new connections. In 1857, he became the representative of
-Cyclop’s Steel Manufactory, Charles Cammell, of Sheffield, and in 1859,
-he applied for and obtained a licence as a translator of English in
-Copenhagen. Finally he had a kind of engineering and patent office,
-assisting strangers in obtaining monopolies, and doing work for new
-railroads, bridges etc. In the beginning of the sixties he caused a
-research to be made concerning the use of coals from Hornholm and
-Silkeborg, and the use of peat for briquettes. In April, 1860, he
-applied to the government for a position, enabling him to work for the
-building of new railroads in Denmark, and at the same time he referred
-to his previous merits in that direction. As he had not, within a year
-thereafter, received any position, he made a petition for a yearly
-pension, in case such a position could not be given to him. As »the
-idea of building the Sealand railroad, as well as the general location
-of this road, is mainly due to Secretary Hjorth ... and further more,
-no small share in the completion of the undertaking is due to him«, it
-was proposed, on the budget for 1861-62, to grant a pension to Hjorth.
-That year and the following ones, until his death, he received 500
-rixdollars.
-
-During these years, Hjorth lived at 10 Nørrebrogade. In 1845, he
-married Vilhelmine Ancker, née Hansen (born on the 27th of March,
-1805), the widow of the farmer Diderick Ancker, of »Lille Egede«, and
-thereby he became the step-father of two daughters. This marriage was
-childless.
-
-This carefully dressed little man[9] in top-hat and high-heeled shoes,
-was well known, and very well liked in many circles. He was always
-amiable and willing to help, and it is known that he has, at great
-personal sacrifice, assisted young artisans who were in hard luck. In
-society he attracted attention by his power of fascination and by his
-universal knowledge. On Sundays he was regularly seen directing his
-steps to St. John’s church, where, for many years, he was a member of
-Rev. Frimodt’s congregation.
-
-During the period of depression above described, Hjorth could naturally
-not very well afford to occupy himself with experiments, nor had he
-much time. Still, in 1857, he secured permission to undertake, at the
-navy yard, some experiments concerning the carrying capacity of a
-magnet at varying distances between the pole and the armature, and at
-the same time he sketched out the construction of an electro-motor,
-especially well adapted to utilize the magnetic attraction. This
-electro-motor was built in Copenhagen with funds granted by the
-»Classenske Fideicommis«. When it was finished, Hjorth applied for the
-money needed to make it double acting.
-
-In autumn 1860, Hjorth was in Paris, and there he worked for his
-electrical inventions.
-
-In 1866, Wilde published his machine, in which the current needed to
-magnetize the electro-magnets was produced by a permanent magnet.
-This is exactly the principle, underlying the dynamos built by Hjorth
-in 1854 and 1855. Hjorth’s good friend, Wm. Macredie, Melbourne,
-sent Hjorth a clipping from an English periodical mentioning Wilde’s
-machine, and called his attention to the identity.
-
-It is to be regretted that Hjorth’s answer is not known, as his
-copy-book for 1866 has been lost.
-
-Considering the data at hand when Hjorth’s biography was published
-in 1907, one might be inclined to believe that Hjorth had invented
-the dynamo principle and then dropped it at once, going back to steel
-magnets. It is, however, clearly evidenced, by the papers left by
-Hjorth, that this has not been the case, but that Hjorth has used the
-dynamo principle, in various, more or less pure, forms, in practically
-all his projects from 1851 to 1870.
-
-[Illustration: Fig. 7. Sketch of Hjorth’s Magneto-Electric Machine
-1867.]
-
-As previously mentioned, Hjorth had been disappointed in his attempts
-to produce energy through an electrical transmission of power, but
-this did not cause him to relinquish the idea of producing energy by
-electric means. He took this up again in a new form in his old age. In
-order to have this idea carried out in practice, Hjorth had a machine
-built, a description and drawing of which is to be found in a pamphlet
-published later on in French and Danish. From this it appears that the
-machine was not originally built according to the dynamo principle.
-Hjorth found no advantage in using the expensive electro-magnets, as
-it was his main object to prove that, by his special arrangement of
-armatures and magnets, he could reduce the power required to produce
-a certain amount of electrical energy. The machine, in its manner
-of construction, reminds one to some extent, of Hjorth’s project of
-1851. Two or three rings, or wheels, of armature coils _A_ (see Fig.
-7) revolve between three or four circular rows of magnets _M_. This
-decreased consumption of power was to be attained by offsetting the
-armature wheels somewhat relatively to one another, for instance so
-that when one armature of the topmost wheel was opposite one magnet
-pole, an armature of the next armature wheel would be spaced one
-quarter of a pole distance from a pole, and an armature of the lowest
-wheel would be one half pole distance from a pole. As it is well known,
-this idea is entirely erroneous, it being contrary to the axiom of the
-constancy of energy.
-
-The machine was built into a casing, and was sent to the Paris
-exhibition of 1867. Hjorth was always very careful not to give any
-information about his inventions to anybody. At the end of April, he
-went to Paris himself. The machine had suffered some injury on the
-journey, and had to be repaired in Paris, and therefore it made its
-appearance rather late. Still he succeeded in having it submitted to
-the judgment of the jury, and a test of electrolytic deposition was
-made, which proved entirely successful.
-
-In Paris he met a certain business-man who, later on, requested to
-enter into partnership with Hjorth. This man was an adventurer, whose
-ambition was to become a Knight of Danebrog. It is only to be regretted
-that this person obtained so great a power over Hjorth, and understood
-how to deceive him. The previously mentioned pamphlet, edited by the
-partner, and named »Batterie magnéto-électrique de Søren Hjorth«, is a
-document of the poorest kind.
-
-Through his partner, Hjorth was introduced to various electricians
-and men of science, among others the renowned Samuel B. Morse, who
-recommended Hjorth’s machine, but took exception to his idea concerning
-the production of energy.
-
-The electrician who repaired Hjorth’s machine, introduced him to the
-president of the French Société d’Encouragement, who had proposed
-a competition for electrical machines, and had offered a prize
-of 3000 fr. for a machine, complying with the conditions given.
-Hjorth’s machine was sent to the society, but he did not succeed in
-obtaining the prize, which was awarded to the subsequently so famous
-»Alliance« machine. On the 7th of July, Hjorth, probably prompted by
-his partner, obtained an audience of Emperor Napoleon III. After he
-had demonstrated his invention, and shown the letter from Professor
-Morse, the Emperor asked him what he could do for him, and Hjorth
-answered that his highest desire was to have a larger machine built,
-and he requested the Emperor’s protection and assistance, in order to
-accomplish this. The Emperor ordered an examination of the machine
-to be made. The well-known Professor Jamin was retained as an expert,
-and Hjorth demonstrated the machine before him. On the following day
-it was examined, in the presence of Hjorth and his partner, by Jamin
-and other men of science. They subsequently had the machine sent to
-the exposition, where they measured the voltage and intensity of
-current, and expressed their satisfaction, as to the results attained.
-Nevertheless Hjorth was disappointed to receive, the next day, through
-the representative of the Emperor, General Favé, a communication that
-the subvention applied for could not be granted.
-
-At the exposition, a great sensation was created by a dynamo exhibited
-by Ladd. This machine had two electro-magnets and two armatures,
-the current being directed from the smaller armature round the
-electro-magnets and taken from the larger armature to the exterior
-circuit, lights for instance. Thus the machine was evidently built
-according to the dynamo principle.
-
-In order to claim his right of priority to this principle, Hjorth went
-to the prominent authority on physics, Count Th. du Moncel, who later
-on became the editor of »La lumière électrique«. As Hjorth himself did
-not know French, the interview probably took place through his partner.
-About this, Moncel writes in the above mentioned periodical, in 1883,
-that Hjorth’s representative was not very conversant with electrical
-matters; therefore he was unable to express himself clearly, and
-consequently Hjorth’s rights of priority were not acknowledged.
-
-Having received the Emperor’s refusal, Hjorth went home, broken down by
-illness and disappointments.
-
-In 1868-69 Hjorth, due to the interest taken in his case by the
-manufacturer Mr. Kähler, succeeded in having a small machine built in
-this gentleman’s shop in Korsør. At the same time, a larger machine was
-made in Copenhagen, the necessary funds being contributed by several
-country gentlemen and merchants interested in the case. Finally, in
-December, 1868, a body of prominent men addressed the government,
-petitioning a subvention of 15,000 rixdollars to be given to Hjorth, in
-order to enable him to build a new and larger machine. As the Ministry
-was not inclined to grant a sum of this size, it proposed to grant
-1000 rixdollars, in order to have the existing machines examined by
-Professor Hummel and other experts. This proposition was accepted by
-Hjorth, and a commission was formed, consisting of Professor Hummel,
-assisted by Professor Holten, Instructor Lorenz and Winstrup, a
-mechanic. As early as December, 1868, Professor Hummel, together with
-head-master Ibsen from Sorø, had visited dyer Gülich of Christianshavn,
-where one of the machines was located, and they made a few tests,
-which Hummel himself did not consider to be of any importance. The
-experiments were to be made in April, 1869, after an assistant had
-made a preliminary experiment, but then Kähler reported that he had
-taken the machine apart, in order to make an alteration therein, and
-that this would take a couple of months. It appears, from a letter
-from Hjorth to the Ministry of the Interior, that Hjorth had arrived
-at the conclusion that he must resort to the use of electro-magnets,
-to a certain extent, at least, on account of »the steel, by continued
-use, losing part of its magnetic power, which necessitates its being
-re-magnetized«, and partly because »it appears that electro-magnets
-may be made to yield a considerably larger magnetic power than steel
-magnets, by means of the electrical current induced thereby«. As this
-change to the dynamo principle was estimated to cost 400 rixdollars,
-Hjorth was informed, in April 1869, that this amount would be paid out
-of the sum, granted for the experiments, when the smaller machine had
-been re-built.
-
-Hjorth’s answer to this was a petition that the 400 rixdollars might
-be spent on any battery, which he might build. Hereafter the case died
-out. His petition was not answered until in April 1870, and the answer
-was a refusal.--At that time Hjorth was in delicate health, and his
-energy had been broken, and a few month’s afterwards he died, on the
-28th of August, 1870. He was survived by his wife, who died on the 30th
-of September 1885.
-
-This indefatigable worker did not succeed in seeing or reaping the
-harvest of his work for the utilization of electricity,--perhaps his
-aim had been too high. At a period when in all countries stone was
-added to stone in the foundation now supporting electrical engineering,
-we Danes have also made our contribution. Hjorth did not possess the
-profound knowledge nor the sharper insight necessary in order to avoid
-errors, but his perseverance, his industry, and his sacrifices, ought
-to be acknowledged, and his name ought to be venerated on account of
-his contributions to the development of electric machinery.
-
-FOOTNOTE:
-
-[9] Hjorth’s English passport, from 1855, contains this information:
-Height: 5 feet 7 inches, Complexion: fresh, Eyes and Hair: grey.
-
-
-
-
-SOURCES.
-
-
-After Hjorth’s death, few knew that he had discovered the dynamo
-principle. If Hjorth himself had understood the importance of this
-discovery, and the magnitude of the revolutions to be caused thereby,
-he would undoubtedly have endeavoured to propagate the knowledge
-thereof. It was not until 1879, when Colonel Bolton read a paper before
-the Society of Telegraph Engineers in London, that Hjorth’s patent No.
-2198, of 1854, was again brought out of oblivion, and accompanied by
-these words: »This appears to involve the principle which was later
-on taken up by others«. Count du Moncel, who had received Hjorth’s
-representative in 1867, when reading these words, was reminded of the
-case. Thereafter he has given Hjorth a fair redress in the above-cited
-article in the valuable periodical »La lumière électrique«, edited by
-him, the heading being »The Actual Inventor of the Principle of the
-Dynamo-Electric Machine«.
-
-Among the few printed sources of information concerning Søren Hjorth
-and his inventions, the following may also be mentioned:
-
- _C. Nyrop_: Industriforeningen i København, 1838-1888.
- _Du Moncel_: L’éclairage électrique, 1884, page 102.
- _Electrician_, July 8th, 1882.
- _La lumière électrique_, 1883, VIII, page 58.
-
-The most important source is the papers, left by Hjorth, which comprise
-a considerable collection of drawings, letters, and rough copies of
-letters written by him. These documents furnish full information,
-not only of Hjorth’s inventions, but also of his entire reasoning
-and manner of being. Probably the most interesting of all are his
-note-books and sketch-books, wherein he used to note down his ideas in
-English, and which are accompanied by neatly made, coloured sketches.
-These papers were not accessible to the public until the autumn of
-1908, and they are now preserved in the archives and library of the
-Polytechnic Institute in Copenhagen.
-
-Important contributions to Hjorth’s history have also been obtained
-from the State Archives, the Archives of the Society of Science, the
-Archives of the Polytechnic Institute and from the papers left by H. C.
-Ørsted.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Transcriber’s Notes:
-
-Footnotes have been moved to the end of each chapter and relabeled
-consecutively through the document.
-
-Illustrations have been moved to paragraph breaks near where they are
-mentioned.
-
-Punctuation has been made consistent.
-
-Variations in spelling and hyphenation were retained as they appear in
-the original publication, except that obvious typographical errors have
-been corrected.
-
-*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SØREN HJORTH ***
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the
-United States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
- you are located before using this eBook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that:
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without
-widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.