summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/63659-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authornfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org>2025-02-04 10:28:00 -0800
committernfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org>2025-02-04 10:28:00 -0800
commit53978b6300d343947dc3404bd225a1cd29e95896 (patch)
treecbb321f84d60448e6124c011e3f4f21d059fb6eb /old/63659-0.txt
parenta66920d7247863ff628b0aaec745b3b83d8feab9 (diff)
NormalizeHEADmain
Diffstat (limited to 'old/63659-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/63659-0.txt11548
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 11548 deletions
diff --git a/old/63659-0.txt b/old/63659-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 7e30c46..0000000
--- a/old/63659-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,11548 +0,0 @@
-Project Gutenberg's The Roswell Report: Case Closed, by James McAndrew
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
-other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
-the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
-to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
-
-Title: The Roswell Report: Case Closed
-
-Author: James McAndrew
-
-Release Date: November 7, 2020 [EBook #63659]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE ROSWELL REPORT: CASE CLOSED ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Tim Lindell, Robert Tonsing and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
-
-
-
-
-
-
-The Cover
-
-A solarized image taken from a U.S. Air Force motion picture of
-experiments conducted for Project HIGH DIVE. This image,
-unsolarized, appears on page 34 (Figure 37).
-
-
-
-
- The Roswell Report
- CASE CLOSED
-
- Headquarters United States Air Force
-
-
-
-
- Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
-
- McAndrew, James, 1963—
- The Roswell report: case closed/James McAndrew
- p. cm.
- Includes index.
- 1. Unidentified flying objects—Sightings and encounters—New
- Mexico—Roswell. I. Title
- TL789.5.N6M33 1997
- 001.942’09789’43—dc21 97-11361
- CIP
-
- For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
- Washington, D.C. 20402
-
- For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office
-Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328
- ISBN 0-16-049018-9
-
-
-
-
- Foreword
-
-
-The “Roswell Incident” has assumed a central place in American folklore
-since the events of the 1940s in a remote area of New Mexico. Because
-the Air Force was a major player in those events, we have played a key
-role in executing the General Accounting Office’s tasking to uncover
-all records regarding that incident.
-
-Our objective throughout this inquiry has been simple and consistent:
-to find all the facts and bring them to light. If documents were
-classified, declassify them; where they were dispersed, bring them into
-a single source for public review.
-
-In July 1994, we completed the first step in that effort and later
-published _The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico
-Desert_. This volume represents the necessary follow-on to that first
-publication and contains additional material and analysis. I think that
-with this publication we have reached our goal of a complete and open
-explanation of the events that occurred in the Southwest many years ago.
-
-Beyond that achievement, this inquiry has shed fascinating light into
-the Air Force of that era and revitalized our appreciation for the
-dedication and accomplishments of the men and women of that time. As we
-celebrate the Air Force’s 50th Anniversary, it is appropriate to once
-again reflect on the sacrifices made by so many to make ours the finest
-air and space force in history.
-
- SHEILA E. WIDNALL
- Secretary of the Air Force
-
-
-
-
- Guide For Readers
-
-
-This publication contains the complete report as submitted to the
-Secretary of the Air Force. The exceptions are the statements found
-in Appendix B. Due to Privacy Act restrictions and by request, the
-addresses of the individuals making these statements have been deleted.
-
-This volume is divided into two sections, eight subsections, eleven
-sidebar discussions, and three appendices. Section One examines alleged
-events at two locations in rural New Mexico. Section Two examines the
-alleged activities at the Roswell Army Airfield Hospital.
-
-Appendix A is a table listing the launch and landing locations of test
-equipment for U.S. Air Force scientific research projects HIGH DIVE and
-EXCELSIOR. Appendix B is a collection of signed sworn statements based
-on in-person interviews conducted for this report by U.S. Air Force
-researchers. The exception is the statement of Lt. Col. William C.
-Kaufman, which was not sworn due to equipment failures at the time of
-interview.
-
-Appendix C contains transcripts of interviews of alleged witnesses
-presented by UFO theorists. The interviews of Gerald Anderson, Alice
-Knight, and Vern Maltais were excerpted in their entirety from unedited
-interviews used to prepare the video, _Recollections of Roswell, Part
-II_ (1993), and appear courtesy of the Fund for UFO Research. The
-interview of Mr. W. Glenn Dennis was provided by the interviewer, Karl
-T. Pflock. The transcript of the interview of Mr. James Ragsdale was
-provided by Kevin Randle, the coauthor of the _Truth About the UFO
-Crash at Roswell_ (Avon Books, 1994), in which direct quotes from this
-transcript appear.
-
-A selected bibliography of technical reports and how to obtain them
-are found on page 221. For additional information on this subject, see
-Headquarters United States Air Force, _The Roswell Report: Fact vs.
-Fiction in the New Mexico Desert_ (Washington D.C.: U.S. Government
-Printing Office, 1995).
-
-
-
-
- The Author
-
-
-Captain James McAndrew serves as an Intelligence Applications Officer
-assigned to the Secretary of the Air Force Declassification and
-Review Team, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C.. Captain McAndrew was the
-coauthor, with Col. Richard L. Weaver, of _The Roswell Report: Fact vs.
-Fiction in the New Mexico Desert_ (1995), the first Air Force work on
-the alleged “Roswell Incident.” He participated in the declassification
-of the _Gulf War Air Power Survey_ (1993) and has served special tours
-of duty with the Drug Enforcement Administration and High Intensity
-Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Task Force. He holds a BS degree with
-honors, from Metropolitan State College, Denver, Colo. and is a native
-of Washington, D.C.
-
-
-
-
- Contents
-
-
- _Page_
-
- =Foreword= iii
-
- =Guide for Readers= v
-
- =Introduction= 1
-
-
- SECTION ONE
- =Flying Saucer Crashes
- and Alien Bodies= 5
-
- 1.1 The “Crash Sites,” Scenarios, and Research Methods 11
-
- 1.2 High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops 23
-
- 1.3 High Altitude Balloon Operations 37
-
- 1.4 Comparison of Witnesses Accounts to U.S. Air Force Activities 55
-
-
- SECTION TWO
- =Reports of Bodies at Roswell
- Army Air Field Hospital= 75
-
- 2.1 The “Missing” Nurse and the Pediatrician 81
-
- 2.2 Aircraft Accidents 93
-
- 2.3 High Altitude Research Projects 101
-
- 2.4 Comparison of the Hospital Account to the Balloon Mishap 109
-
-
- =Conclusion= 123
-
-
- Notes
-
- Section One 127
-
- Section Two 139
-
- APPENDIX A
- =Anthropomorphic Dummy Launch
- and Landing Locations= 155
-
-
- APPENDIX B
- =Witness Statements=
-
- Charles E. Clouthier 160
-
- Charles A. Coltman, Jr., Col., USAF, MC (Ret) 162
-
- Dan D. Fulgham, Col., USAF (Ret) 164
-
- Bernard D. Gildenberg, GS-14 (Ret) 166
-
- Ole Jorgeson, MSgt., USAF (Ret) 169
-
- William C. Kaufman, Lt. Col., USAF (Ret) 171
-
- Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., Col., USAF (Ret) 174
-
- Roland H. Lutz, CMSgt., USAF (Ret) 178
-
- Raymond A. Madson, Lt. Col. USAF (Ret) 180
-
- Frank B. Nordstrom, M.D. 182
-
-
- APPENDIX C
- =Interviews=
-
- Gerald Anderson 187
-
- Glenn Dennis 197
-
- Alice Knight 213
-
- Vern Maltais 214
-
- James Ragsdale 215
-
-
- =Selected Bibliography of
- Technical Reports= 221
-
-
- =Index= 225
-
-
- Tables
-
- SECTION ONE
- 1.1 Comparison of Testimony to Actual Air Force Equipment
- and Procedures Used to Launch and Recover
- Anthropomorphic Dummies 69
-
- SECTION TWO
- 2.1 Persons Described and Periods of Service at
- Roswell AAF/Walker AFB 91
-
- 2.2 Fatal Air Force Aircraft Accidents by Year
- in the Vicinity of Walker AFB-1947–1960 93
-
- 2.3 Analysis of Air Force Aircraft Accidents
- by Year in the Vicinity of Walker AFB-1947–1960 94
-
-
- Figures
-
- SECTION ONE
-
- 1. _The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction In The New Mexico Desert._
-
- 2. The International UFO Museum and Research Center, Roswell, N.M.
-
- 3. Drawing of Project MOGUL Balloon Train.
-
- 4. Maj. Jesse Marcel With “Flying Disc” Debris.
-
- 5. ML-307B/AP Radar Target on Ground.
-
- 6. ML-307B/AP Radar Target in Flight.
-
- 7. “Harassed Rancher Who Located ‘Saucer’ Sorry He Told About It,”
- _Roswell Daily Record_, July 9, 1947.
-
- 8. Announcement from November 4, 1992 _Socorro_ (N.M.) _Defensor
- Chieftain_.
-
- 9. B.D. “Duke” Gildenberg.
-
- 10. Charles B. Moore.
-
- 11. Map of New Mexico Depicting “Crash Sites” and “Debris Field.”
-
- 12. Missile Recovery Scene.
-
- 13. Drone Recovery Scene.
-
- 14. “Sierra Sam” Type Anthropomorphic Dummy.
-
- 15. National Transportation Highway Safety Administration
- Advertisement Featuring “Vince and Larry.”
-
- 16. “Dummy Joe” with J.J. Higgins and Guy Ball, McCook Field, Ohio,
- 1920.
-
- 17. Rope and Sandbag Parachute Drop Dummy on Ground.
-
- 18. Rope and Sandbag Parachute Drop Dummy Descending at Wright
- Field, Ohio.
-
- 19. Ted Smith Model Anthropomorphic Dummy in Ejection Seat.
-
- 20. Anthropomorphic Dummy “Oscar Eightball” at Muroc AAF, Calif.
-
- 21. “Sierra Sam” Anthropomorphic Dummy in Ejection Seat.
-
- 22. Alderson Laboratories Anthropomorphic Dummies Hanging in
- Laboratory.
-
- 23. Project HIGH DIVE Dummy Launch.
-
- 24. Map of New Mexico Depicting Dummy Landing Locations.
-
- 25. Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.’s Record Parachute Jump.
-
- 26. Article In December 1960 National Geographic Featuring Project
- EXCELSIOR.
-
- 27. Magazine Covers Depicting U.S. Air Force Aero-Medical
- Experiments.
-
- 28. M-342 Five-Ton Wrecker.
-
- 29. Project HIGH DIVE Gondola and “Sierra Sam” Type Anthropomorphic
- Dummy.
-
- 30. 1st Lts. Raymond A. Madson and Eugene M. Schwartz with “Sierra
- Sam” Type Anthropomorphic Dummy.
-
- 31. M-35 Two-Ton Cargo Truck.
-
- 32. M-37 ¾-Ton Cargo Truck.
-
- 33. Lt. Col. John P. Stapp Preparing for Rocket Sled Test.
-
- 34. Cover of September 12, 1955 _Time_ Magazine Depicting
- Lt. Col. John P. Stapp.
-
- 35. Anthropomorphic Dummy with Missing Fingers.
-
- 36–38. Anthropomorphic Dummy Falling from Balloon Gondola.
-
- 39. Memo from Project HIGH DIVE Files.
-
- 40. Hanging Anthropomorphic Dummies and Hospital Gurney.
-
- 41. Anthropomorphic Dummy in Insulation Bag.
-
- 42–43. High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops Report Covers.
-
- 44. Inflation of High Altitude Balloon for Project VIKING.
-
- 45. Lobby Card from _On The Threshold of Space_.
-
- 46. Promotional Photo From _On The Threshold of Space_.
-
- 47. Promotional Photo From _On The Threshold of Space_.
-
- 48. Relative Sizes of High Altitude Balloon, Airliner, and Hot Air
- Balloon.
-
- 49. Target Balloon Launch Near Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 50. DISCOVERER Nosecone Rigged for High Altitude Balloon Flight.
-
- 51. DISCOVERER Capsule Aboard the _USS Haiti Victory_.
-
- 52. VIKING Spaceprobe at Martin Marietta Corp., Denver, Colo.
-
- 53. Balloon Launch Of VOYAGER-MARS Space Probe.
-
- 54. VIKING Space Probe at Roswell Industrial Airport, Roswell, N.M.
-
- 55. VIKING Space Probe Awaiting Recovery at White Sands Missile
- Range.
-
- 56. Drawing of Alleged UFO.
-
- 57. “Vee” Balloon at Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 58. Current Members of the Holloman AFB Balloon Branch.
-
- 59. B.D. Gildenberg, Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., and Lt. Col.
- David G. Simons (MC).
-
- 60. Ranch Family with Panel from Project STARGAZER.
-
- 61. Balloon Recovery Personnel and “The Hermit.”
-
- 62. Mule Borrowed for Balloon Payload Recovery.
-
- 63. Bulldozer Used for Balloon Payload Recovery.
-
- 64. M-43 Ambulance.
-
- 65–66. Unusual Balloon Payloads.
-
- 67. U.S. Army Communications Payload.
-
- 68. Scientific Balloon Payload Flown for The Johns Hopkins University.
-
- 69. Balloon Payload Flown from Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 70. Project HIGH DIVE Anthropomorphic Dummy Launch.
-
- 71. Vehicles Present at High Altitude Balloon Launch and Recovery
- Sites.
-
- 72. Alderson Laboratories Anthropomorphic Dummies.
-
- 73. Anthropomorphic Dummies Attached to Rack.
-
- 74. Anthropomorphic Dummy with “Bandaged” Head.
-
- 75. Anthropomorphic Dummy with Torn Uniform.
-
- 76. Promotional Photo From _On The Threshold of Space_.
-
- 77. L-20 Observation Aircraft.
-
- 78. C-47 Transport Aircraft.
-
- 79. Balloon Crew Preparing Balloon for Launch.
-
- 80. Anthropomorphic Dummy Launch Scene.
-
- 81. Typical High Altitude Balloon Launch Scene.
-
- 82. Map of New Mexico.
-
- SECTION TWO
-
- 1. The International UFO Museum and Research Center.
-
- 2. Capt. Eileen M. Fanton.
-
- 3. “Flying Saucer Swindlers,” _True_ Magazine, August 1956.
-
- 4. “The Flying Saucers and the Mysterious Little Green Men,” _True_
- Magazine, September 1952.
-
- 5. Col. Lee F. Ferrell and U.S. Senator Dennis Chavez.
-
- 6. Lt. Col. Lucille C. Slattery.
-
- 7. KC-97 Aircraft.
-
- 8. 4036th USAF Hospital, Walker AFB, N.M., 1956.
-
- 9. Ballard Funeral Home, Roswell, N.M.
-
- 10. Maj. David G. Simons (MC), Otto C. Winzen, and Capt. Joseph W.
- Kittinger, Jr.
-
- 11. Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. in MAN HIGH Capsule.
-
- 12. Lt. Col. David G. Simons.
-
- 13. Bernard D. “Duke” Gildenberg and 1st Lt. Clifton McClure.
-
- 14. Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. and the EXCELSIOR High Altitude
- Balloon Gondola.
-
- 15. Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. and William C. White with
- STARGAZER Gondola.
-
- 16. Capt. Grover Schock and Otto C. Winzen.
-
- 17. Capt. Dan D. Fulgham and Capt. William C. Kaufman.
-
- 18. Thirty-foot Polyethylene Training Balloon.
-
- 19. Maj. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. in Vietnam.
-
- 20. A2C Ole Jorgeson and M-43 Ambulance Converted to a Communications
- Vehicle.
-
- 21. Stenciled Letters Described as “Hieroglyphics.”
-
- 22. A2C Ole Jorgeson in Rear of M-43 Ambulance.
-
- 23. Polyethylene Balloon on Ground After High Altitude Flight.
-
- 24. Hospital Dispensary, Building 317, Walker AFB, N.M., 1954.
-
- 25. Main Gate at Walker AFB, N.M., 1954.
-
- 26. Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. and Dr. J. Allen Hynek.
-
- 27. Clinical Record Cover Sheet of Capt. Dan D. Fulgham.
-
- 28. Capt. Dan D. Fulgham at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.
-
- 29. Maj. Dan D. Fulgham, James Lovell, Hilary Ray, and Alan Bean.
-
- 30. Maj. Dan D. Fulgham at Ubon AB, Thailand.
-
- 31. Memorial Plaque at Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 32. Nenninger Balloon Launch Facility at Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 33. Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. Following EXCELSIOR I.
-
-
-
-
- Introduction
-
-
-In July 1994, the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force concluded
-an exhaustive search for records in response to a General Accounting
-Office (GAO) inquiry of an event popularly known as the “Roswell
-Incident.” The focus of the GAO probe, initiated at the request of New
-Mexico Congressman Steven Schiff, was to determine if the U.S. Air
-Force, or any other U.S. government agency, possessed information on
-the alleged crash and recovery of an extraterrestrial vehicle and its
-alien occupants near Roswell, N.M. in July 1947.
-
-Reports of flying saucers and alien bodies allegedly sighted in the
-Roswell area in 1947, have been the subject of intense domestic
-and international media attention. This attention has resulted in
-countless newspaper and magazine articles, books, a television series,
-a full-length motion picture, and even a film purported to be a U.S.
-government “alien autopsy.”
-
-The July 1994 Air Force report concluded that the predecessor to the
-U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Army Air Forces, did indeed recover material
-near Roswell in July 1947. This 1,000-page report methodically explains
-that what was recovered by the Army Air Forces was not the remnants of
-an extraterrestrial spacecraft and its alien crew, but debris from an
-Army Air Forces balloon-borne research project code named MOGUL.[1]
-Records located describing research carried out under the MOGUL
-project, most of which were never classified (and publicly available)
-were collected, provided to GAO, and published in one volume for ease
-of access for the general public.[*]
-
-[*] MOGUL records which ultimately lead to the identification of the
-origin of the 1947 claims of “flying saucer” debris, described balloon
-research that was never classified. Other MOGUL records, describing
-military applications of balloon-borne acoustical sensors, were
-declassified, along with millions of pages of other unrelated executive
-branch documents by Executive Order 11652, issued on March 6, 1972 by
-President Richard M. Nixon.
-
-Although MOGUL components clearly accounted for the claims of “flying
-saucer” debris recovered in 1947, lingering questions remained
-concerning anecdotal accounts that included descriptions of “alien”
-bodies. The issue of “bodies” was not discussed extensively in the 1994
-report because there were not any bodies connected with events that
-occurred in 1947. The extensive Secretary of the Air Force-directed
-search of Army Air Forces and U.S. Air Force records from 1947 did not
-yield information that even suggested the 1947 “Roswell” events were
-anything other than the retrieval of the MOGUL equipment.[2]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 1. _The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction
- in the New Mexico Desert_ contains, in its entirety, the report
- submitted to the Secretary of the Air Force in July 1994. It is
- available for sale from the U.S. Government Printing Office,
- Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C., 20402-9328. Stock
- No. 008-070-00697-9, ISBN 0-16-048023-X.]
-
-Subsequent to the 1994 report, Air Force researchers discovered
-information that provided a rational explanation for the alleged
-observations of alien bodies associated with the “Roswell Incident.”
-Pursuant to the discovery, research efforts compared documented Air
-Force activities to the incredible claims of “flying saucers,” “aliens”
-and seemingly unusual Air Force involvement. This in-depth examination
-revealed that these accounts, in most instances, were of actual Air
-Force activities but were seriously flawed in several major areas, most
-notably: the Air Force operations that inspired reports of “bodies” (in
-addition to being earthly in origin) did not occur in 1947. It appears
-that UFO proponents have failed to establish the accurate dates for
-these “alien” observations (in some instances by more than a decade)
-and then erroneously linked them to the actual Project MOGUL debris
-recovery.
-
-This report discusses the results of this further research and
-identifies the likely sources of the claims of “alien” bodies.
-Contrary to allegations that the Air Force has engaged in a cover-up
-and possesses dark secrets involving the Roswell claims, some of
-the accounts appear to be descriptions of unclassified and widely
-publicized Air Force scientific achievements. Other descriptions of
-bodies appear to be descriptions of actual incidents in which Air Force
-members were killed or injured in the line of duty.
-
-The conclusions of the additional research are:
-
- • Air Force activities which occurred over a period of many years
- have been consolidated and are now represented to have occurred in
- two or three days in July 1947.
-
- • “Aliens” observed in the New Mexico desert were probably
- anthropomorphic test dummies that were carried aloft by U.S. Air
- Force high altitude balloons for scientific research.
-
- • The “unusual” military activities in the New Mexico desert were
- high altitude research balloon launch and recovery operations. The
- reports of military units that always seemed to arrive shortly
- after the crash of a flying saucer to retrieve the saucer and
- “crew,” were actually accurate descriptions of Air Force personnel
- engaged in anthropomorphic dummy recovery operations.
-
- • Claims of bodies at the Roswell Army Air Field hospital were most
- likely a combination of two separate incidents:
-
- 1) a 1956 KC-97 aircraft accident in which 11 Air Force members
- lost their lives; and,
-
- 2) a 1959 manned balloon mishap in which two Air Force pilots were
- injured.
-
-This report is based on thoroughly documented research supported by
-official records, technical reports, film footage, photographs, and
-interviews with individuals who were involved in these events.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 2. Roswell, N.M. (pop. 37,000), boasts
- competing “museums” focusing on the Roswell Incident, including
- this one, The International UFO Museum and Research Center.]
-
-
-
-
- SECTION ONE
-
- Flying Saucer Crashes and Alien Bodies
-
-
-The most puzzling and intriguing element of the complex series of
-events now known as the Roswell Incident, are the alleged sightings of
-alien bodies. The bodies turned what, for many years, was just another
-flying saucer story, into what many UFO proponents claim is the best
-case for extraterrestrial visitation of Earth. The importance of bodies
-and the assumptions made as to their origin is illustrated in a passage
-from a popular Roswell book:
-
- _Crashed saucers are one thing, and could well turn out to be
- futuristic American or even foreign aircraft or missiles. But
- alien bodies are another matter entirely, and hardly subject to
- misinterpretation._[3]
-
-The 1994 Air Force report determined that project MOGUL was responsible
-for the 1947 events. MOGUL was an experimental attempt to acoustically
-detect suspected Soviet nuclear weapon explosions and ballistic missile
-launches.[4] MOGUL utilized acoustical sensors, radar reflecting
-targets and other devices attached to a train of weather balloons over
-600 feet long. Claims that the U.S. Army Air Forces recovered a “flying
-disc” in 1947, were based primarily on the lack of identification of
-the radar targets, an element of weather equipment used on the long
-MOGUL balloon train. The oddly constructed radar targets were found by
-a New Mexico rancher during the height of the first U.S. flying saucer
-wave in 1947.[5] The rancher brought the remnants of the balloons and
-radar targets to the local sheriff after he allegedly learned of the
-broadcasted reports of flying discs. However, following some initial
-confusion at Roswell Army Air Field, the “flying disc” was soon
-identified by Army Air Forces officials as a standard radar target.[6]
-
-From 1947 until the late 1970s, the Roswell Incident was essentially
-a non-story. The reports that existed contain only descriptions of
-mundane materials that originated from the Project MOGUL balloon
-train—“tinfoil, paper, tape, rubber, and sticks.”[7] The first claim
-of “bodies” appeared in the late 1970s, with additional claims made
-during the 1980s and 1990s. These claims were usually based on
-anecdotal accounts of second- and third-hand witnesses collected by UFO
-proponents as much as 40 years after the alleged incident. The same
-anecdotal accounts that referred to bodies also described massive field
-operations conducted by the U.S. military to recover crash debris from
-a supposed extraterrestrial spaceship.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 3. An illustration of a Project MOGUL balloon
- train similar to one found on a ranch 75 miles northwest of
- Roswell, N.M. in June 1947, which contains all of the “strange”
- materials described as part of a “flying disc.” Initial confusion
- at Roswell AAF and delayed identification of this equipment was the
- first in a series of unrelated events now known as the “Roswell
- Incident.”]
-
-A technique used by some UFO authors to collect anecdotal corroboration
-for their theories was to solicit cooperating witnesses through
-newspaper announcements. For example, one such solicitation appeared in
-the _Socorro_ (N.M.) _Defensor Chieftain_ on November 4, 1992, on behalf
-of Don Berliner and Stanton T. Friedman, the authors of the book _Crash
-at Corona_. This request solicited persons to provide information about
-the supposed crashes of alien spacecraft in the Socorro area.[8][*]
-
- [*] Socorro, N.M. is situated at the northwest boundary of White
- Sands Missile Range, the largest military test range in the United
- States. Since the 1940s, White Sands and the surrounding areas of
- New Mexico have been the site of a high volume of military test
- and evaluation activity, including the launch and recovery of
- anthropomorphic dummies carried aloft by high altitude balloons.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 4. (_Right_) Maj. Jesse Marcel, an intelligence
- officer from Roswell Army Air Field, with the debris found 75 miles
- northwest of Roswell in June 1947. When compared to a standard
- radar target used by project MOGUL, it is clear that they are
- the same object. (_Courtesy, Special Collections Division, the
- University of Texas at Arlington Libraries, Arlington, Tex._)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 5 & 6. (_Below, left and right_) Constructed
- of aluminized paper glued and taped to a balsa wood frame, several
- ML-307B/AP radar targets were used on the MOGUL balloon train to
- make it visible to radar. (_U.S. Air Force photos_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 7. This account from the July 9, 1947 _Roswell
- Daily Record_, described the materials “tinfoil, paper, rubber,
- tape, and sticks” found on the ranch 75 miles northwest of Roswell,
- in June 1947.
-
- _Harassed Rancher who Located ‘Saucer’ Sorry He Told About It_
-
- W. W. Brazel, 48, Lincoln county rancher living 30 miles south east
- of Corona, today told his story of finding what the army at first
- described as a flying disk, but the publicity which attended his
- find caused him to add that if he ever found anything else short of
- a bomb he sure wasn’t going to say anything about it.
-
- Brazel was brought here late yesterday by W. E. Whitmore, of radio
- station KGFL, had his picture taken and gave an interview to the
- Record and Jason Kellahin, sent here from the Albuquerque bureau
- of the Associated Press to cover the story. The picture he posed
- for was sent out over AP telephoto wire sending machine specially
- set up in the Record office by R. D. Adair, AP wire chief sent here
- from Albuquerque for the sole purpose of getting out his picture
- and that of sheriff George Wilcox, to whom Brazel originally gave
- the information of his find.
-
- Brazel related that on June 14 he and an 8-year old son, Vernon
- were about 7 or 8 miles from the ranch house of the J. B. Foster
- ranch, which he operates, when they came upon a large area of
- bright wreckage made up on rubber strips, tinfoil, a rather tough
- paper and sticks.
-
- At the time Brazel was in a hurry to get his round made and he did
- not pay much attention to it. But he did remark about what he had
- seen and on July 4 he, his wife, Vernon and a daughter Betty, age
- 14, went back to the spot and gathered up quite a bit of the debris.
-
- The next day he first heard about the flying disks, and he wondered
- if what he had found might be the remnants of one of these.
-
- Monday he came to town to sell some wool and while here he went to
- see sheriff George Wilcox and “whispered kinda confidential like”
- that he might have found a flying disk.
-
- Wilcox got in touch with the Roswell Army Air Field and Maj. Jesse
- A. Marcel and a man in plain clothes accompanied him home, where
- they picked up the rest of the pieces of the “disk” and went to his
- home to try to reconstruct it.
-
- According to Brazel they simply could not reconstruct it at all.
- They tried to make a kite, out of it, but could not do that and
- could not find any way to put it back together so that it would fit.
-
- Then Major Marcel brought it to Roswell and that was the last he
- heard of it until the story broke that he had found a flying disk.
-
- Brazel said that he did not see it fall from the sky and did not
- see it before it was torn up, so he did not know the size or shape
- it might have been, but he thought it might have been about as
- large as a table top. The balloon which held it up, if that was how
- it worked, must have been about 12 feet long, he felt, measuring
- the distance by the size of the room in which he sat. The rubber
- was smoky gray in color and scattered over an area about 200 yards
- in diameter.
-
- When the debris was gathered up the tinfoil, paper, tape, and
- sticks made a bundle about three feet long and 7 or 8 inches thick,
- while the rubber made a bundle about 18 or 20 inches long and about
- 8 inches thick. In all, he estimated, the entire lot would have
- weighed maybe five pounds.
-
- There was no sign of any metal in the area which might have been
- used for an engine and no sign of any propellers of any kind,
- although at least one paper fin had been glued onto some of the
- tinfoil.
-
- There were no words to be found anywhere on the instrument,
- although there were letters on some of the parts. Considerable
- scotch tape and some tape with flowers printed upon it had been
- used in the construction.
-
- No strings or wire were to be found but there were some eyelets in
- the paper to indicate that some sort of attachment may have been
- used.
-
- Brazel said that he had previously found two weather observation
- balloons on the ranch, but that what he found this time did not in
- any way resemble either of these.
-
- “I am sure what I found was not any weather observation balloon.”
- he said. “But if I find anything else, besides a bomb they are
- going to have a hard time getting me to say anything about it.”]
-
-In response to the newspaper announcement, two scientists central to
-the actual explanation of the “Roswell” events, Professor Charles
-B. Moore, a former U.S. Army Air Forces contract engineer, and
-Bernard D. Gildenberg, retired Holloman AFB Balloon Branch Physical
-Science Administrator and Meteorologist, came forward with pertinent
-information.[9] According to Moore and Gildenberg, when they met with
-the authors their explanations that some of the Air Force projects they
-participated in were most likely responsible for the incident, they
-were summarily dismissed. The authors even went so far as to suggest
-that these distinguished scientists were participants in a multifaceted
-government cover-up to conceal the truth about the Roswell Incident.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 8. Announcement from the November 4, 1992
- _Socorro_ (N.M.) _Defensor Chieftain_ soliciting witnesses of flying
- saucer crashes in New Mexico. When former Air Force scientists
- responded to advise the authors that Air Force projects were most
- probably responsible for the UFO accounts, they were summarily
- dismissed by the authors who placed the announcement, and then were
- accused of participating in a cover-up.
-
- _Authors seek UFO witnesses_
-
- Co-authors of a major book on the 1947 crash of at least one
- alien spacecraft in the New Mexico desert will be at the Golden
- Manor Motel in Socorro on Monday, Nov. 16 to seek out additional
- witnesses to these events.
-
- Nuclear physicist Stanton T. Friedman and aviation/science writer
- Don Berliner, whose “Crash at Corona” is now in its second
- printing, want to meet with people having knowledge of the 1947
- crashes.
-
- Their book, being published in August by Paragon House of New York,
- is being prepared for a made-for-TV movie. It is the story of the
- discovery, retrieval, shipping and cover-up of what the authors
- call the most important scientific discovery of the past thousand
- years.
-
- It is based on dozens of interviews with first- and second-hand
- civilian and ex-military witnesses to various parts of what is
- referred to as a very complex series of events.
-
- In order to strengthen their case for government knowledge of what
- they call “the truth behind almost 50 years of UFO sightings,” the
- authors are seeking out additional, reliable witnesses. It remains
- their policy to honor requests to keep the names of witnesses
- private.
-
- For more information, contact Don Berliner, 1202 S. Washington St.,
- Alexandria. VA., 22314 (703-548-0405); or Stanton T. Friedman, 79
- Pembroke Crescent, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 2V1, Canada (506
- 457-0232).
-
- Witnesses are invited to call either author collect or to make
- arrangements to meet them at any of their stops in New Mexico,
- which include the cities of Santa Fe, Albuquerque, Las Cruces,
- Alamogordo and Roswell.]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 9. (_Left_) B.D. “Duke” Gildenberg served
- as the civilian meteorologist, engineer, and physical science
- administrator for the Holloman AFB Balloon Branch from
- 1951–1981. Gildenberg actively participated in thousands of
- high altitude balloon operations, including the flights that
- dropped anthropomorphic dummies at off-range locations throughout
- New Mexico. Gildenberg, the “father” of Air Force scientific
- ballooning, was instrumental in identifying the many actual Air
- Force activities now known as the “Roswell Incident.”]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 10. (_Right_) Charles B. Moore, Professor
- Emeritus of Atmospheric Physics at the New Mexico Institute of
- Mining and Technology, was the project engineer for New York
- University under contract to the U.S. Army Air Forces to develop
- high altitude balloon technology for Project MOGUL. Moore launched
- the balloon train on June 4, 1947, that when combined with other
- events, are now known as the “Roswell Incident.”]
-
-Since many of the Roswell accounts and allegations were collected by
-irregular methods and are not specifically documented, the series
-of events as alleged by UFO theorists has become very complex and
-requires clarification. Therefore, the following section will briefly
-examine some of the more confusing elements of the Roswell stories,
-specifically, the multiple crash sites and complex scenarios, in order
-to facilitate an objective analysis of actual events.
-
-
-
-
- 1.1
- The “Crash Sites,” Scenarios, and Research Methods
-
-
-The “Crash Sites”
-
-From 1947 until the late 1970s, the Roswell Incident was confined
-to one alleged crash site. This site, located on the Foster Ranch
-approximately 75 miles northwest of the city of Roswell, was the actual
-landing site of a Project MOGUL balloon train in June 1947.[10] The
-MOGUL landing site is referred to in popular Roswell literature as the
-“debris field.”
-
-In the 1970s, the 1980s and throughout the 1990s, additional witnesses
-came forward with claims and descriptions of two other alleged crash
-sites. One of these sites was supposedly north of Roswell, the other
-site was alleged to have been approximately 175 miles northwest of
-Roswell in an area of New Mexico known as the San Agustin Plains.[11]
-What distinguished the two new crash sites from the original debris
-field were accounts of alien bodies.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 11. Map of New Mexico depicting the “crash
- sites” and “debris field.” ]
-
-
-The Scenarios
-
- [Sidenote: “_It must be emphasized that the claims of bodies only
- became part of the Roswell Incident after 1978, when they were
- erroneously linked to the July 1947 retrieval of Project MOGUL
- components._”]
-
-UFO enthusiasts have attempted to explain the obvious contradiction
-of multiple impact sites involving only one alien craft through the
-introduction of complicated scenarios. These scenarios have become
-increasingly convoluted since the proponents of each crash site must
-make allowances to have “their” flying saucer at the correct time
-and place—the actual MOGUL balloon train landing site in early July,
-1947—in order to “fit” with the rest of the story. The actual Project
-MOGUL landing site, 75 miles northwest of Roswell, lends credibility,
-and more importantly establishes a _time frame_, for the other accounts
-that include reports of bodies. Flying saucer enthusiasts use the
-documented presence of U.S. Army Air Forces personnel at the MOGUL
-site in July 1947, who were there to retrieve the MOGUL balloon train,
-to provide the nucleus of unrelated and much later accounts that
-include reports of “bodies.” It must be emphasized that the claims of
-“bodies” only became part of the Roswell Incident after 1978, when they
-were erroneously linked to the July 1947 retrieval of Project MOGUL
-components.
-
-In general, “Roswell Incident” scenarios claim that a disabled alien
-craft momentarily touched down at the site 75 miles northwest of
-Roswell, leaving behind parts of the spaceship (material that has been
-subsequently identified as components of a MOGUL balloon train) to
-create the original “debris field.” The scenarios further contend that
-the damaged craft again became airborne and flew to its final crash
-site, at either the location north of Roswell or 175 miles northwest of
-Roswell on the San Agustin Plains.
-
-Regardless of the dispute over the location, an element common to
-most scenarios was that, once recovered, the bodies were supposedly
-transported to the hospital at Roswell Army Air Field for autopsy. Also
-common to these theories is that the bodies were later shipped from
-Roswell AAF to another facility, usually Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio (or
-a host of other facilities—this is another area of further disagreement
-among UFO theorists) for further evaluation and ultimate deep-freeze
-storage.
-
-
-Research Methods
-
-In an attempt to untangle this collection of complicated assertions and
-determine if there was any validity to the reports of bodies, Air Force
-researchers faced the task of sorting through and examining anecdotal
-testimony of hundreds of witnesses. However, a large number of the
-accounts were eliminated by applying previously established facts to
-the testimonies. The July 1994 report to the Secretary of the Air Force
-clearly presented and documented these facts:
-
- _a._ The U.S. Army Air Forces did not recover an extraterrestrial
- vehicle and alien crew. This conclusion was based on extensive
- research that included a thorough review of both classified
- and unclassified materials at record depositories, archives,
- libraries and research facilities throughout the nation. Of the
- millions of pages of material reviewed, there was no mention of
- any activities that even tangentially suggested such an event.
- Additionally, former and retired Air Force members and civilian
- contract scientists were located and released from any possible
- nondisclosure agreements they may have entered into regarding
- past classified activities. This release allowed them to freely
- discuss with Air Force researchers, or any other persons,
- information related to this issue. These releases were issued at
- the express written direction of the Secretary of the Air Force.
- Interviews with these persons yielded no information supporting
- extraterrestrial claims or any other unusual activities.
-
- _b._ The reports of bodies were not associated with Project MOGUL.
- The MOGUL balloon train did not, was not designed to, nor could it
- carry passengers. Neither did it carry hazardous materials that
- would have caused injury, death, or mutilation to persons who may
- have come in contact with any of its components.
-
- _c._ Actual events, if any, that inspired reports of bodies did
- not occur in 1947. Based on extensive examinations of U.S. Army
- Air Forces activities in 1947, no evidence was found to support
- allegations that the Army Air Forces was involved in any uncommon
- operations other than the retrieval of the MOGUL balloon train
- in the Roswell area in July 1947. Examination of research and
- development projects, aircraft crashes, errant missiles and
- possible nuclear accidents yielded no information to support a 1947
- claim.
-
-In light of these documented facts, the hundreds of anecdotal accounts
-were reduced to a few. Eliminated were accounts that were likely
-descriptions of materials known to be part of the Project MOGUL balloon
-train and accounts describing transportation of these materials.
-
-From the remaining testimony, Air Force researchers developed the
-following set of working hypotheses to assist in identifying the actual
-events, if any, matching those described by the witnesses.
-
- _a._ Due to the number and great detail provided in some of the
- accounts, it was likely that some event(s) actually did occur.
-
- _b._ Due to the many similarities of the two crash site
- descriptions and the considerable distance between them, it was
- likely that more than one event with similar characteristics was
- the basis for these accounts.
-
- _c._ Since the account of bodies at the Roswell Army Air Field
- hospital did not contain elements similar to reports of the two
- crash sites, it was likely that this account was unrelated to
- the crash site accounts. (The hospital account will be addressed
- separately in Section Two of this report.)
-
-The remaining testimony was examined with regard both to the facts and
-to working hypotheses to determine if there were common threads or
-links connecting any of the accounts. If similarities were found, the
-next step was to determine if they were related to an actual event.
-Finally, if there were actual event(s), were they part of U.S. Air
-Force or U.S. Government activities?
-
-
-Common Threads
-
-Careful examination of the testimony revealed that primary witnesses
-of the two “crashed saucer” locations contained descriptions common to
-both. These areas of commonality contained both general and detailed
-characteristics. However, before continuing, the accounts were
-carefully examined to determine if the testimony related by individual
-witnesses were of their own experiences and not a recitation of
-information given by other persons. While many aspects of the remaining
-accounts were judged to be similar, other aspects were found to be
-significantly different. The accounts on which the analysis is based
-were determined, in all likelihood, to have been independently obtained
-or observed by the witnesses.
-
-=General Similarities.= The testimony presented for both crash sites
-generally followed the same sequence of events. The witnesses were
-in a rural and isolated area of New Mexico. In the course of their
-travels in this area, they came upon a crashed aerial vehicle. The
-witnesses then proceeded to the area of the crash to investigate and at
-some distance they observed strange looking “beings” that appeared to
-be crewmembers of the vehicle. Soon thereafter, a convoy of military
-vehicles and soldiers arrived at the site. Military personnel allegedly
-instructed the civilians to leave the area and forget what they had
-seen. As the witnesses left the area, the military personnel commenced
-with a recovery operation of the crashed aerial vehicle and “crew.”
-
-=Detailed Similarities.= Along with general similarities in the
-testimonies, there also existed a substantial amount of similar
-detailed descriptions of the “aliens,” and the military vehicles and
-procedures allegedly used to recover them.
-
-The first obvious similarity was the descriptions of the aliens.
-Mr. Gerald Anderson, an alleged witness of events at the site 175
-miles northwest of Roswell, recalled, “I thought they were plastic
-dolls.”[12] Mr. James Ragsdale, an alleged witness of the site north of
-Roswell, stated, “They were using dummies in those damned things.”[13]
-Another alleged witness to a “crash” north of Roswell, Frank J.
-Kaufman, recalled that there was “talk” that perhaps an “experimental
-plane with dummies in it” was the source of the claims.[14]
-
-Additional similarities were also noted. Mr. Vern Maltais, a secondhand
-witness of the site 175 miles northwest of Roswell, described the
-hands of the “aliens” as, “They had four fingers.”[15] Anderson
-characterized the hands as, “They didn’t have a little finger.”[16]
-He also described the heads of the aliens as “completely bald”[17]
-while Maltais described them as “hairless.”[18] The uniforms of the
-aliens were independently described by Anderson as “one-piece suits
-... a shiny silverish-gray color”[19] and by Maltais as “one-piece
-and gray in color.”[20] The date of this event was also not precisely
-known. Maltais recalled that it may have occurred “around 1950”[21] and
-another secondhand witness, Alice Knight stated, “I don’t recall the
-date.”[22]
-
-Witnesses of different sites also used the terms “wrecker”[23] and
-“six-by-six”[24] when they described the military vehicles present at
-the different recovery sites. One witness described seeing a “medium
-sized Jeep/truck”[25] and another witness described seeing a “weapons
-carrier”[26] (a weapons carrier is a mid-sized Jeep-type truck).
-
-
-The Research Profile
-
-When the general and specific similarities were combined, a profile
-emerged describing the event or activity that might have been observed.
-The profile, which contains elements common to at least two, and in
-some cases, all of the accounts, established a set of criteria used
-to determine what the witnesses may have observed. The profile is as
-follows:
-
- _a._ An activity that, if viewed from a distance, would appear
- unusual.
-
- _b._ An activity of which the exact date is not known.
-
- _c._ An activity that took place in two rural areas of New Mexico.
-
- _d._ An activity that involved a type of aerial vehicle with dolls
- or dummies that had four fingers, were bald, and wore one-piece
- gray suits.
-
- _e._ An activity that required recovery by numerous military
- personnel and an assortment of vehicles that included a wrecker, a
- six-by-six, and a weapons carrier.
-
-Based on this profile, research was begun to identify events or
-activities with these characteristics. Due to the location of the
-sites, attention was focused on Roswell AAF (renamed Walker AFB in
-1948), White Sands Missile Range and Holloman AFB, N.M. The aerial
-vehicles assigned or under development at these facilities were
-aircraft, missiles, remotely-piloted drones, and high altitude
-balloons. The operational characteristics and areas where these
-vehicles flew were researched to determine if they played a role in the
-events described by the witnesses.
-
-=Missiles and Drones.= Missiles and drones were determined not to have
-been responsible for the accounts.[*] The areas where the alleged
-crashes took place were, in all likelihood, too far from the White
-Sands Missile Range. Missiles were equipped with a self-destruct
-mechanism that was activated if it strayed off-course or out of the
-White Sands Missile Range. There was never a program that required
-a dummy or doll to be placed inside a missile or a drone. However,
-missiles were launched from White Sands carrying monkeys and other
-small animals aloft for scientific research.[27] These projects were
-well documented, and none of these missiles landed near either of the
-two crash sites.
-
- [*] From September 1961 until March 1965 12 Atlas F
- intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) were deployed by the
- 579^{th} Strategic Missile Squadron in areas surrounding Walker
- AFB, N.M. These missiles were determined not to have been involved
- in the Roswell Incident.
-
-=Aircraft.= Aircraft seemed just as unlikely as missiles to have been
-responsible for the extraterrestrial claims as outlined in the profile.
-Although additional research revealed the significant role dummies
-played in the test and evaluation of aircraft emergency escape systems,
-these dummies were used on board aircraft and on the high-speed test
-track at Holloman AFB. However, aircraft test flights demanded strict
-adherence to established flight profiles over the instrumented portions
-of the White Sands Missile Range, many miles from the alleged crash
-sites. Dummies used on the high-speed track remained in the immediate
-vicinity of the track facilities at Holloman AFB. This geographical
-impossibility ruled out dummies that were ejected from aircraft
-and those used on the high-speed track as a cause of alleged alien
-sightings. (Aircraft accidents will be discussed extensively in Section
-Two of this report.)
-
- [Illustration: Figs. 12 & 13. Missiles (_left_) and drones
- (_right_) under development at Holloman AFB, N.M. were determined
- not to have been involved in the “Roswell Incident.” (_U.S. Air
- Force photos_)]
-
-=High Altitude Research Balloons.= The only vehicles not yet evaluated
-as a possible source of the accounts were high altitude research
-balloons. Previous reviews of early research balloon flight records
-revealed that trajectories of high altitude balloons were, at times,
-unpredictable and did not usually remain over Holloman AFB or White
-Sands Missile Range.[28] Many of the scientific payloads required
-recovery so the data collected during flight could be returned to the
-laboratory for analysis.
-
-These characteristics seemed to fit at least some of the research
-profile. Atmospheric sampling apparatus or weather instruments, the
-typical payload of many high altitude balloons, could hardly have been
-mistaken for space aliens. A careful examination of the instruments
-carried aloft by the high altitude balloons revealed that one unique
-project used a device that very likely could be mistaken for an
-alien—an anthropomorphic dummy.
-
-An anthropomorphic dummy is a human substitute equipped with a variety
-of instrumentation to measure effects of environments and situations
-deemed too hazardous for a human. These abstractly human dummies
-were first used in New Mexico in May 1950, and have been used on a
-continuous basis since that time.[29]
-
-In the 1950s, anthropomorphic dummies were not widely exposed outside
-of scientific research circles and easily could have been mistaken for
-something they were not. Today, anthropomorphic dummies, better known
-as crash test dummies, are easily identifiable and are even the “stars”
-of their own automotive safety advertising campaign. During the 1950s
-when the U.S. Air Force dropped the odd-looking test devices from high
-altitude balloons in its program to study high altitude human free-fall
-characteristics, public awareness and stardom were decades away. It
-seems likely that someone who unexpectedly observed these dummies at a
-distance would believe they had seen something unusual. In retrospect,
-when interviewed over 40 years later, they could accurately report that
-they had seen something _very unusual_.
-
-With the introduction of anthropomorphic dummies as a possible
-explanation for the reports of bodies, another element of the research
-profile appeared to be satisfied. Specific information that described
-the locations, methods, and procedures used to employ the dummies was
-required before any definitive conclusions could be drawn. To gather
-this detailed information, research efforts were concentrated on high
-altitude balloon operations and the specific projects that utilized
-balloon-borne anthropomorphic dummies.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 14. (_Left_) Example of an anthropomorphic
- dummy carried aloft by U.S. Air Force high altitude balloons. These
- dummies landed at numerous locations throughout New Mexico during
- the 1950s. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 15. (_Right_) Newspaper advertisement depicting
- anthropomorphic dummies “Vince and Larry” “stars” of the successful
- advertising campaign by the National Highway Traffic Safety
- Administration to encourage use of safety belts. (_Courtesy of
- NHTSA_)
-
- “I’LL JUST BRACE
- MYSELF WITH THE
- STEERING WHEEL”
-
- Who are you trying to fool? There’s no way a steering wheel
- can stop you from slamming into a dashboard. Only a safety belt can.
- Stop making excuses and start buckling your safety belt.
-
- YOU COULD LEARN A LOT FROM A DUMMY.
- BUCKLE YOUR SAFETY BELT.
-
- A Public Service Message
- US Department
- of Transportation
-]
-
-
- Test Dummies Used by the U.S. Air Force
-
-Since the beginning of manned flight, designers have sought a
-substitute for the human body to test hazardous new equipment. Early
-devices used by the predecessors of the U.S. Air Force were simply
-constructed parachute drop test dummies with little similarity to the
-human form. Following World War II, aircraft emergency escape systems
-became increasingly sophisticated and engineers required a dummy with
-more humanlike characteristics.
-
-
-Parachute Drop Dummies
-
-During World War I research and development of the first U.S. military
-parachute was underway at McCook Field, Ohio. To test the parachute,
-engineers experimented with several types of dummies, settling on
-a model constructed of three-inch hemp rope and sandbags with the
-approximate proportions of a medium-sized man.[30] The new invention
-was soon known by the nickname “Dummy Joe.” Dummy Joe is said to have
-made more than five thousand “jumps” between 1918 and 1924.[31]
-
-By 1924, parachutes were required on military aircraft with their
-serviceability tested by dummies dropped from aircraft.[32] For this
-routine testing, several types of dummies were used. The most common
-type is shown in figures 17 and 18. Parachutes were individually
-drop-tested from aircraft until the early stages of World War II, when,
-due both to increased reliability and large numbers of parachutes in
-service, this routine practice was discontinued. Nonetheless, test
-dummies were still used frequently by the Parachute Branch of Air
-Materiel Command (AMC) at Wright Field, Ohio, to test new parachute
-designs.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 16. “‘Dummy Joe,’ the hero of five thousand
- jumps” is shown here with engineers J.J. Higgins (_left_) and Guy
- Ball at McCook Field, Ohio in 1920. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 17. (_Left_) Early rope and sandbag dummy used
- to test parachutes. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 18. (_Right_) Parachute drop dummies in use at
- Wright Field, Ohio. The historic Flight Test hangars, Hangars 1 and
- 9, can be seen in the background. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-
-Anthropomorphic Dummies
-
-The ejection seat had been developed and used successfully by the
-German Luftwaffe during the latter stages of World War II. The utility
-of this invention was realized when the U.S. Army Air Forces obtained
-an ejection seat in 1944.[33] To properly test the ejection seat, the
-Army Air Forces required a dummy that had the same center of gravity
-and weight distribution as a human, characteristics that parachute
-drop dummies did not possess. In 1944, the USAAF Air Materiel Command
-contracted with the Ted Smith Company of Upper Darby, Pa. to design
-and manufacture the first dummy intended to accurately represent a
-human.[34] The dummy had the same basic shape as a human, but with only
-abstract human features, and “skin” made of canvas.
-
- [Illustration: Figs. 19 & 20. (_Left & Right_) These early
- anthropomorphic dummies, manufactured by the Ted Smith Co., of
- Upper Darby, Pa., were used by the Army Air Forces beginning in
- 1944. They were replaced by a more realistic dummy in 1949.
-
- (_Right_) “Oscar Eightball,” the name given to this early model
- anthropomorphic dummy by Col. John P. Stapp, is shown following a
- run of the high-speed track at Muroc AAF (now Edwards AFB), Calif.,
- in 1947. (_U.S. Air Force photos_)]
-
-In 1949, the U.S. Air Force Aero Medical Laboratory submitted a
-proposal for an improved model of the anthropomorphic dummy.[35]
-This request was originated by the renowned Air Force scientist and
-physician John P. Stapp, now a retired Colonel, who conducted a series
-of landmark experiments at Muroc (now Edwards) AFB, Calif., to measure
-the effects of acceleration and deceleration during high-speed aircraft
-ejections.[36] Stapp required a dummy that had the same center of
-gravity and articulation as a human, but, unlike the Ted Smith dummy,
-was more human in appearance. A more accurate external appearance was
-required to provide for the proper fit of helmets, oxygen masks, and
-other equipment used during the tests. Stapp requested the Anthropology
-Branch of the Aero Medical Laboratory at Wright Field to review
-anthropological, orthopedic, and engineering literature to prepare
-specifications for the new dummy.[37] Plaster casts of the torso, legs,
-and arms of an Air Force pilot were also taken to assure accuracy.[38]
-The result was a proposed dummy that stood 72 inches tall, weighed
-200 pounds, had provisions for mounting instrumentation, and could
-withstand up to 100 times the force of gravity or 100Gs.
-
-In 1949, a contract was awarded to Sierra Engineering Company of Sierra
-Madre, Calif., and deliveries began in 1950.[39] This dummy quickly
-became known as “Sierra Sam.”
-
-In 1952, a contract for anthropomorphic dummies was awarded to Alderson
-Research Laboratories, Inc., of New York City.[40] Dummies constructed
-by both companies possessed the same basic characteristics: a skeleton
-of aluminum or steel, latex or plastic skin, a cast aluminum skull, and
-an instrument cavity in the torso and head for the mounting of strain
-gauges, accelerometers, transducers, and rate gyros.[41] Models used by
-the Air Force were primarily parachute drop and ejection seat versions
-with center of gravity tolerances within one quarter inch.
-
-Over the next several years the two companies improved and redesigned
-internal structures and instrumentation, but the basic external
-appearance of the dummies remained relatively constant from the mid
-1950s to the late 1960s. Dummies of these types were most likely the
-“aliens” associated with the “Roswell Incident.”
-
- [Illustration: Figs. 21 & 22. Examples of a “Sierra Sam” (_left_)
- and Alderson Laboratories anthropomorphic dummies (_right_) of the
- type dropped from balloons at off-range locations throughout New
- Mexico during the 1950s. (_U.S. Air Force photos_)]
-
-
-
-
- 1.2
- High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops
-
-
-From 1953 to 1959, anthropomorphic dummies were used by the U.S. Air
-Force Aero Medical Laboratory as part of the high altitude aircraft
-escape projects HIGH DIVE and EXCELSIOR.[42] The object of these
-studies was to devise a method to return a pilot or astronaut to earth
-by parachute, if forced to escape at extreme altitudes.[43]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 23. Project HIGH DIVE anthropomorphic dummy
- launch, White Sands Proving Ground, N.M., June 11, 1957. (_U.S. Air
- Force photo_)]
-
-Anthropomorphic dummies were transported to altitudes up to 98,000 feet
-by high altitude balloons. The dummies were then released for a period
-of free-fall while body movements and escape equipment performance were
-recorded by a variety of instruments. Forty-three high altitude balloon
-flights carrying 67 anthropomorphic dummies were launched and recovered
-throughout New Mexico between June 1954 and February 1959.[44] Due
-to prevailing wind conditions, operational factors and ruggedness of
-the terrain, the majority of dummies impacted outside the confines
-of military reservations in eastern New Mexico, near Roswell, and in
-areas surrounding the Tularosa Valley in south central New Mexico.[45]
-Additionally, 30 dummies were dropped by aircraft over White Sands
-Proving Ground, N.M. in 1953. In 1959, 150 dummies were dropped by
-aircraft over Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio (possibly accounting for
-alleged alien “sightings” at that location).[46]
-
- [Illustration: Anthropomorphic Dummy Launch and Landing Locations]
-
-A number of these launch and recovery locations were in the areas where
-the “crashed saucer” and “space aliens” were allegedly observed.
-
-Following the series of dummy tests, a human subject, test pilot Capt.
-Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., now a retired Colonel, made three parachute
-jumps from high altitude balloons. Since free-fall tests from these
-unprecedented altitudes were extremely hazardous, they could not
-be accomplished by a human until a rigorous testing program using
-anthropomorphic dummies was completed.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 25. “Lord, take care of me now,” were Capt.
- Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.’s words as he exited the EXCELSIOR III
- balloon gondola at 102,800 feet on August 16, 1960, over White
- Sands Proving Ground, N.M. Kittinger’s courageous scientific
- achievement remains, to this day, the highest parachute jump ever
- accomplished. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-
- A Cover-Up?
-
-Countering claims of a cover-up, Air Force projects that used
-anthropomorphic dummies and human subjects were unclassified and
-widely publicized in numerous newspaper and magazine stories, books,
-and television reports. These included a book written by test pilot
-Kittinger, _The Long, Lonely Leap_, another book, _Man High_, by MAN
-HIGH Project Scientist, Lt. Col. David G. Simons (MC), a feature
-article in _National Geographic_, and cover stories in _Life_,
-_Collier’s_, _Popular Mechanics_, and _Time_.[47] A characterization
-of Kittinger’s record parachute jump even appeared in the adolescent
-magazine, _MAD_.[48] The intense public interest in HIGH DIVE,
-EXCELSIOR and other aero medical projects conducted at Holloman AFB
-also resulted in a 1956 Twentieth Century Fox full-length motion
-picture, _On the Threshold of Space_ (see page 38).
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 26. This photo of Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger,
- Jr. taken by a remotely operated camera on the EXCELSIOR III
- gondola, was featured in the December 1960 _National Geographic_.
-
- The Long, Lonely Leap
-
- _World’s highest jump tests a new type of parachute for
- high-altitude flyers and scientists returning from the threshold of
- space_
-
- By CAPT. JOSEPH W. KITTINGER. JR., USAF
-
- _Illustrations by National Geographic photographer VOLKMAR WENTZEL_
-
- OVERHEAD my onion-shaped balloon spread its 200-foot diameter
- against a black daytime sky. More than 18½ miles below lay the
- cloud-hidden New Mexico desert to which I shortly would parachute.
-
- Sitting in my gondola, which gently twisted with the balloon’s slow
- turnings, I had begun to sweat lightly, though the temperature read
- 36° below zero Fahrenheit. Sunlight burned in on me under the edge
- of an aluminized antiglare curtain and through the gondola’s open
- door.
-
- In my earphones crackled the voice of Capt. Marvin Feldstein, one
- of our project’s two doctors, from ground control at Holloman Air
- Force Base:
-
- “Three minutes till jump, Joe.”
-
- I was ready to go, for more reasons than one. For about an hour—as
- the balloon rose from 50,000 to 102,800 feet above sea level—I
- had been exposed to an environment requiring the protection of a
- pressure suit and helmet, and the fear of their failure had always
- been present. If either should break, unconsciousness would come in
- 10 or 12 seconds, and death within two minutes.
-
- In our altitude-chamber flights at the laboratory, I always
-
- “=Lord, take care of me now=,” I pray, then take the big step-off
- that begins my return from the edge of space, a 13-minute,
- 45-second plunge to an earth wrapped in clouds. The lanyard
- attached to my parachute pack is my last link with the gondola.
- It starts a timer on a small stabilization chute that will
- open 16 seconds later and prevent horizontal spinning. Without
- stabilization, man could not survive a jump from these high
- altitudes.
-
- A National Geographic camera mounted above the gondola took this
- remarkable photograph at 102,800 feet.
-
- MS Ektachrome National Geographic Society
-]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 27. Contemporary magazines that featured
- experiments at Holloman AFB, N.M. _Clockwise from top left_,
- _Time_, September 12, 1955; _Life_, August 29, 1960; _Popular
- Mechanics Magazine_, (_center_) January 1951; _Collier’s_, June 25,
- 1954; and _Life_, September 2, 1957.]
-
-
-Dummy Drop Procedures
-
-For the majority of the tests, dummies were flown to altitudes between
-30,000 and 98,000 feet attached to a specially designed rack suspended
-below a high altitude balloon.[49] On several flights the dummies
-were mounted in the door of an experimental high altitude balloon
-gondola.[50] Upon reaching the desired altitude, the dummies were
-released and free-fell for several minutes before deployment of the
-main parachute.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 28. (_Left_) Witnesses at both flying saucer
- “crash” sites stated that a “wrecker” was used in the recovery
- of the “alien” craft. This was a likely reference to the M-342
- five-ton wrecker, used to launch and recover anthropomorphic
- dummies.]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 29. (_Right_) Three tests utilized
- anthropomorphic dummies mounted in the door of an experimental
- Project HIGH DIVE gondola. This launch took place on October 8,
- 1957, in front of curious onlookers at the public picnic area of
- White Sands National Monument, N.M. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-The dummies used for the balloon drops were outfitted with standard
-equipment of an Air Force aircrew member. This equipment consisted
-of a one-piece flightsuit, olive drab, gray (witnesses had described
-seeing aliens in gray one-piece suits) or fuchsia in color, boots,
-and a parachute pack.[51] The dummies were also fitted with an
-instrumentation kit that contained accelerometers, pressure
-transducers, an oscillograph, and a camera to record movements of the
-dummy during free-fall.[52]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 30. A “Sierra Sam” with HIGH DIVE Project
- Officers 1st Lts. Eugene M. Schwartz (_left_) and Raymond A. Madson
- (_right_). This dummy is outfitted in a “sage green” colored
- flightsuit (a shade of gray) with red tape sealing its neck,
- wrists, and ankles. (_U.S. Air Force_)]
-
-Recoveries of the test dummies were accomplished by personnel from
-the Holloman AFB Balloon Branch.[53] Typically, eight to twelve
-civilian and military recovery personnel arrived at the site of an
-anthropomorphic dummy landing as soon as possible following impact.
-The recovery crews operated a variety of aircraft and vehicles.
-These included a wrecker, a six-by-six, a weapons carrier, and L-20
-observation and C-47 transport aircraft—the exact vehicles and aircraft
-described by the witnesses as having been present at the crashed saucer
-locations.[54] On one occasion, just southwest of Roswell, a HIGH DIVE
-project officer, 1st Lt. Raymond A. Madson, even conducted a search for
-dummies on horseback[55] (see statement in Appendix B).
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 31. An M-35 2½-ton cargo truck, commonly
- referred to as a “six-by-six,” were used by the Holloman Balloon
- Branch to launch and recover anthropomorphic dummies and suspension
- racks at numerous locations throughout New Mexico. (_U.S. Air Force
- photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 32. M-37 ¾-ton utility trucks, known as
- “weapons carriers,” were used for high altitude balloon recoveries
- by the Holloman Balloon Branch during the 1950s. Here, recovery
- technicians use an M-37 to retrieve an Aero Medical gondola from a
- location on Holloman AFB, N.M. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-To expedite the recoveries, crews were prepositioned with their
-vehicles along a paved highway in the area where impact was
-expected.[56] On a typical flight the dummies were separated from
-the balloon by radio command and descended by parachute.[57] Prompt
-recovery of the dummies and their suspension racks, which usually
-did not land in the same location resulting in extensive ground and
-air searches, was essential for researchers to evaluate information
-collected by the instrumentation and cameras. To assist the recovery
-personnel, a variety of methods were used to enhance the visibility
-of the dummies: smoke grenades, pigment powder, and brightly colored
-parachute canopies.[58] Also, recovery notices promising a $25 reward
-were taped to an exposed portion of a dummy.[59] Local newspapers and
-radio stations were contacted when equipment was lost.[60]
-
-
- The Bravest Man
-
- America was introduced to Col. John Paul Stapp on December 10,
- 1954, when he became known as both the “the bravest” and “the
- fastest” man on earth. Stapp earned these titles following a
- rocket sled test that accelerated him to 632 miles per hour. He
- reached this speed in just five seconds—faster than a .45 caliber
- bullet—and was decelerated to a stop in 1.4 seconds, subjecting
- his body to more than 42 times the force of gravity! While this
- was America’s introduction to Col. Stapp, the 1954 rocket sled
- test that examined aircraft restraint devices and human responses
- to accelerative/decelerative forces and windblast, was just one of
- many achievements of this legendary Air Force physician.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 33. The first “space doctor,” Lt. Col. John
- P. Stapp (now a retired Colonel) being strapped into the rocket
- sled Sonic Wind Nᵒ 1, on December 10, 1954, at Holloman AFB, N.M.
- Courageously, Stapp was his own volunteer subject on 29 rocket sled
- tests and earned two awards of the Legion of Merit and the Cheney
- Award for valor and self-sacrifice. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- Born in Bahia, Brazil to American missionary parents, Stapp sold
- pots and pans door to door during the Depression while he earned
- both undergraduate and graduate degrees in zoology and chemistry
- at Baylor University. He went on to earn a doctorate in biophysics
- from the University of Texas, and a doctorate in medicine from the
- University of Minnesota.
-
- In 1944 Stapp entered the U.S. Army Air Forces and became
- a flight surgeon. From 1946 to 1963, due to his unique
- qualifications in biophysics and medicine, he conducted a series
- of acceleration/deceleration experiments on the high-speed track
- at Muroc (now Edwards AFB), Calif.,[61] and later at Holloman
- AFB, N.M. Developments from these and other studies resulted in
- innovations which have saved many lives. These included improved
- safety belt restraint systems and design specifications for
- aircraft and automobiles, aircraft ejection and emergency escape
- systems, refinement of automobile airbag systems, and development
- of the modern anthropomorphic test dummy.
-
- As commander of the U.S. Air Force Aeromedical Field Laboratory
- at Holloman AFB, N.M. and later the Aero Medical Laboratory at
- Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, Stapp won support for the Air Force
- manned high altitude balloons projects—MAN HIGH and EXCELSIOR. As
- a testament to his thorough safety preparations, these and other
- extremely hazardous projects administered by Stapp, did not result
- in a single debilitating injury to a test subject. These projects
- helped pave the way for future flights of both high altitude
- aircraft such as the X-15, and of spacecraft for the MERCURY,
- GEMINI, and APOLLO programs. In fact, Stapp’s expertise was called
- upon to assist in the selection of the initial cadre of astronauts,
- the “MERCURY Seven.”
-
- He retired from the Air Force in 1970, but not before amassing a
- collection of awards and honors. These included two awards of the
- Legion of Merit for rocket sled experiments, the Cheney Award for
- 1954, and membership in the National Aviation Hall of Fame.
-
- In association with the Society of Automotive Engineers, Stapp
- continues to participate in annual conferences in which industry
- experts assemble to discuss vehicle safety issues. The conferences,
- now in their 40th year bear his name: the Stapp Car Crash
- Conferences.
-
- In 1991, in recognition of a lifetime of unselfish dedication
- to scientific research, Stapp was awarded the National Medal of
- Technology, bestowed upon him at the White House by President
- George Bush.
-
- He is married to the former Lillian Lanese, a former soloist with
- the Ballet Theater of New York, and resides in Alamogordo, N.M. At
- 87 years old he continues to maintain a dizzying pace of travel and
- lectures.
-
- It is not an exaggeration that virtually every person who has
- safely operated, or ridden in, an automobile, aircraft, or
- spacecraft, has benefited from the genius of Col. John Paul Stapp,
- and owes this brave scientist, physician, and visionary, a great
- deal of thanks.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 34. September 12, 1955 edition of _Time_
- featuring Col. John P. Stapp and his rocket sled experiments at
- Holloman AFB, N.M.]
-
-Despite these efforts, the dummies were not always recovered
-immediately; one was not found for nearly three years and several
-were not recovered at all.[62] When they were found, the dummies and
-instrumentation were often damaged from impact.[63] Damage to the
-dummies included loss of heads, arms, legs and fingers.[64] This
-detail, dummies with missing fingers, appears to satisfy another
-element of the research profile—aliens with only four fingers.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 35. Rough treatment and parachute failures
- during balloon drops often caused damage to the hands of the
- dummies. This detail, “beings” with “four fingers,” was related by
- two witnesses as a distinguishing feature of the Roswell aliens.
- (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Figs. 36–38. Actual photographs of an Alderson
- Laboratories type anthropomorphic dummy falling away from its
- suspension rack at high altitude over New Mexico. Fig. 37
- (_center_) appears on the cover of this publication. (_U.S. Air
- Force photos_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 39. Memo taken from Project HIGH DIVE files
- explaining the loss of a dummy near Roswell, N.M. in November 1955.
-
- Loss of MR Equipment
- WCUSS-22 WCRDB-4 19 Jan 56
- ATTN: Mr. R.L. Mason Lt. Nielsen/1bc
- Ext. 2-4194/B.33
-
- 1. On 17 November 1955, an anthropomorphic dummy, B-15 jacket and
- a stop watch were lost during a high altitude dummy drop from a
- balloon at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico.
-
- 2. The drop was performed to determine the effectiveness of a
- two stage personnel parachute in lowering a man-like dummy from
- 85,000 feet. The test was part of a continuing task “High Altitude
- Escape Studies”, 7218-71719. The point at which the dummy reached
- the ground was not known to the recovery crews at the time and an
- extensive search lasting through the first week of December 1955
- failed to discover the lost items.
-
- 3. Lost are:
-
- a. 1 ea., dummy, anthropomorphic, Sierra Engineering Co. model 120,
- stock no. 3500-NL-30010,
-
- b. 1 ea., jacket, B-15, spec. 3220, size 36, stock no.
- 8415-269-0512,
-
- c. 1 ea., stop watch, Fisher Scientific Co. P/N 14-646, stock no.
- 8TAA 98545.
-
- 4. Because of the loss of these items as a result of a test,
- it is requested that Lt. Henry P. Nielsen be relieved of the
- responsibility for these items.
-
- HARVEY E. SAVELY
- Chief, Biophysics Branch
- Aero. Medical Laboratory
- Directorate of Research
-
- CONCURRENCE
-]
-
-What may have contributed to a misunderstanding if the dummies were
-viewed by persons unfamiliar with their intended use, were the methods
-used by Holloman AFB personnel to transport them. The dummies were
-sometimes transported to and from off-range locations in wooden
-shipping containers, similar to caskets, to prevent damage to fragile
-instruments mounted in and on the dummy.[65] Also, canvas military
-stretchers and hospital gurneys were used (a procedure recommended by a
-dummy manufacturer) to move the dummies in the laboratory or retrieve
-dummies in the field after a test.[66] The first 10 dummy drops also
-utilized black or silver insulation bags, similar to “body bags” in
-which the dummies were placed for flight to guard against equipment
-failure at low ambient temperatures of the upper atmosphere.[67]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 40. Air Force personnel used stretchers and
- gurneys to pick up 200-pound dummies in the field and to move them
- in the laboratory. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 41. For the first 10 balloon flights, dummies
- were placed in insulation bags to protect temperature-sensitive
- equipment. These bags may have been described by at least one
- witness as “body bags” used to recover alien victims from the crash
- of a flying saucer. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-On one occasion northwest of Roswell, a local woman unfamiliar with the
-test activities arrived at a dummy landing site prior to the arrival of
-the recovery personnel.[68] The woman saw what appeared to be a human
-embedded head first in a snowbank and became hysterical. The woman
-screamed, “He’s dead!, he’s dead!”[69]
-
-It now appeared that anthropomorphic dummies dropped by high altitude
-balloons satisfied the requirements of the research profile. However,
-the review of high altitude balloon operations revealed what appeared
-to be explanations for some other sightings of odd objects in the
-deserts and skies of New Mexico.
-
- [Illustration: Figs. 42 & 43. These reports detailed the methods
- and procedures used for the dummy tests. They may be obtained from
- the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Va.
-
- WADC TECHNICAL REPORT 57-477
- PART I.
- ASTLA DOCUMENT No. AD 130965
-
- HIGH ALTITUDE BALLOON DUMMY DROPS
- PART I. THE UNSTABILIZED DUMMY DROPS
-
- _RAYMOND A. MADSON, 1ST LT., USAF_
-
- _AERO MEDICAL LABORATORY_
-
- OCTOBER 1957
-
- WRIGHT AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER
-
- WADC TECHNICAL REPORT 57-477 (II)
-
- HIGH ALTITUDE BALLOON DUMMY DROPS
- II: THE STABILIZED DUMMY DROPS
-
- _RAYMOND A. MADSON, 1ST/LT, USAF_
-
- _LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS LABORATORY
- AEROSPACE MEDICAL LABORATORY_
-
- AUGUST 1961
-
- AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS DIVISION
- AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND
- UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
- WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO
- ]
-
-
-
-
- 1.3
- High Altitude Balloon Operations
-
-
-Research has shown that many high altitude balloons launched
-from Holloman AFB, N.M., were recovered in locations, and under
-circumstances, that strongly resemble those described by UFO proponents
-as the recovery of a “flying saucer” and “alien” crew. When these
-descriptions were carefully examined, it was clear that they bore more
-than just a resemblance to Air Force activities. It appears that some
-were actually distorted references to Air Force personnel and equipment
-engaged in scientific study through the use of high altitude balloons.
-
-Since 1947, U.S. Air Force research organizations at Holloman AFB,
-N.M., have launched and recovered approximately 2,500 high altitude
-balloons. The Air Force organization that conducted most of these
-activities, the Holloman Balloon Branch, launched a wide range of
-sophisticated, and from most perspectives, odd looking equipment into
-the stratosphere above New Mexico. In fact, the =_very first_= high
-altitude data gathering balloon flight launched from Alamogordo Army
-Airfield (now Holloman AFB), N.M., on June 4, 1947, was found by the
-rancher and was the first of many unrelated events now collectively
-known as the “Roswell Incident.”
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 44. Inflation of a U.S. Air Force 626 ft. long,
- 34.6 million cu. ft. research balloon on August 13, 1972. This
- balloon was launched from Roswell Industrial Air Center (formerly
- Roswell AAF), Roswell, N.M., to test components of the NASA VIKING
- space probe. (_photo by Ole Jorgeson_) ]
-
-
- On the Threshold of Space
-
- In 1956, Twentieth Century Fox released _On the Threshold of
- Space_, a full-length motion picture based on Air Force aero
- medical projects conducted at Holloman AFB, N.M. Starring Guy
- Madison, John Hodiak, and Dean Jagger, this drama chronicled the
- high altitude balloon experiments of projects HIGH DIVE/EXCELSIOR
- and the high-speed track studies conducted by Col. John P. Stapp.
- Filmed on location at Holloman AFB, Air Force personnel, high
- altitude balloons, aircraft, vehicles, and other equipment,
- including the actual anthropomorphic dummies responsible for
- sightings of aliens, were used in the making of this film.
-
- In an ironic twist, in 1990 the television program _Unsolved
- Mysteries_, featured a segment on the Roswell Incident. The
- program, hosted by actor Robert Stack, depicted a dramatized
- version of the claims of “aliens,” space ships and mysterious
- government recovery crews. Interestingly, a review of newspapers
- from 1956 announcing the Hollywood premiere of _On the Threshold
- of Space_, listed Stack among the persons scheduled to attend this
- star-studded event.[70]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 45. Lobby card of the 1956 Twentieth Century
- Fox release, _On the Threshold of Space_ starring Guy Madison
- (_seated_) and Martin Milner (_right_).]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 46. Publicity photograph from _On the Threshold
- of Space_ with (_from left_) Cameron Mitchell, Guy Madison and
- Dean Jagger. Scenes from the movie clearly depict the actual
- anthropomorphic dummies described nearly 40 years later as
- extraterrestrial “aliens.”]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 47. Col. J. P. Stapp’s historic 1954 rocket
- sled test was re-created for _On the Threshold of Space_ (_see
- figure 33, page 31_).]
-
-
-High Altitude Polyethylene Research Balloons
-
-In 1946, as a result of research conducted for project MOGUL,
-Charles B. Moore, a New York University graduate student working
-under contract for the U.S. Army Air Forces, made a significant
-technological discovery: the use of polyethylene for high altitude
-balloon construction.[71] Polyethylene is a lightweight plastic that
-can withstand stresses of a high altitude environment that differed
-drastically from, and greatly exceeded, the capabilities of standard
-rubber weather balloons used previously. Moore’s discovery was a
-breakthrough in technology. For the first time, scientists were able to
-make detailed, sustained studies of the upper atmosphere. Polyethylene
-balloons, first produced in 1947 for Project MOGUL, are still widely
-used today for a host of scientific applications.
-
-High altitude polyethylene balloons and standard rubber weather
-balloons differ greatly in size, construction, and utility. The
-difference between these two types of balloons historically has been
-the subject of misunderstandings in that the term “weather balloon” is
-often used to describe both types of balloons.
-
-High altitude polyethylene balloons are used to transport scientific
-payloads of several pounds to several tons to altitudes of nearly
-200,000 feet. Polyethylene balloons do not increase in size and burst
-with increases in volume as they rise, as do standard rubber weather
-balloons. They are launched with excess capacity to accommodate the
-increase in volume. This characteristic of polyethylene balloons makes
-them substantially more stable than rubber weather balloons and capable
-of sustained constant level flight, a requirement for most scientific
-applications.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 48. Relative sizes of a modern high altitude
- polyethylene research balloon, an airliner, and a hot-air balloon.
- Inaccurate characterizations of the giant high altitude research
- balloons as “weather balloons” (which are typically 15 feet in
- diameter) has historically been the source of confusion. (_courtesy
- of Mike Smith, Raven Industries_)
-
- Raven Industries 40 million cubic foot balloon. 450 ft in diameter
- at 130,000 feet
-
- Hot-air balloon. 50 ft in diameter
-
- DC-9 airliner 104 ft long]
-
-The initial polyethylene balloons had diameters of only seven feet and
-carried payloads of five pounds or less.[72] As balloon technology
-advanced, payload capacities and sizes of balloons increased. Modern
-polyethylene balloons, some as long as several football fields when
-on the ground, expand at altitude to volumes large enough to contain
-many jet airliners. Polyethylene balloons flown by the U.S. Air Force
-have reached altitudes of 170,000 feet and lifted payloads of 15,000
-pounds.[73]
-
-During the late 1940’s and 1950’s, a characteristic associated
-with the large, newly invented, polyethylene balloons, was that
-they were often misidentified as flying saucers.[74] During this
-period, polyethylene balloons launched from Holloman AFB, generated
-flying saucer reports on nearly every flight.[75] There were so many
-reports that police, broadcast radio, and newspaper accounts of these
-sightings were used by Holloman technicians to supplement early balloon
-tracking techniques.[76] Balloons launched at Holloman AFB generated
-an especially high number of reports due to the excellent visibility
-in the New Mexico region. Also, the balloons, flown at altitudes
-of approximately 100,000 feet, were illuminated before the earth
-during the periods just after sunset and just before sunrise. In this
-instance, receiving sunlight before the earth, the plastic balloons
-appeared as large bright objects against a dark sky. Also, with the
-refractive and translucent qualities of polyethylene, the balloons
-appeared to change color, size, and shape.
-
-The large balloons generated UFO reports based on their radar
-tracks.[77] This was due to large metallic payloads that weighed
-up to several tons and echoed radar returns not usually associated
-with balloons. In later years, balloons were equipped with altitude
-and position reporting transponders and strobe lights that greatly
-diminished the numbers of both visual and radar UFO sightings.
-
-One classic misidentification of a Holloman balloon that was mistaken
-for a UFO, was launched on October 27, 1953.[78] According to the
-following account published in a widely distributed 1958 history of
-Air Force balloon operations, _Contributions of Balloon Operations to
-Research and Development at the Air Force Missile Development Center
-Holloman Air Force Base, N. Mex. 1947–1958_, a suspected Holloman
-balloon was tracked both visually and by radar over London, England on
-November 3, 1953.
-
-“English accounts of the incident contained such statements as
-‘tremendous speed,’ ‘practically motionless,’ ‘circular or spherical
-and white in color,’ ‘emitting or reflecting a fierce light.’ Altitude
-was reported as 61,000 feet—and as no research balloon had recently
-been sent up from Britain, there was ample room for local saucer
-enthusiasts to claim the ‘unidentified flying object’ as proof of their
-theories. A much likelier explanation, however, is that this was really
-the balloon launched from Holloman on 27 October.”[79]
-
-
-High Altitude Balloon Payloads
-
-Over the years, payloads transported by high altitude polyethylene
-balloons ranged from simple radio transmitters to anthropomorphic
-dummies to sophisticated satellite components and NASA interplanetary
-space probes. Many of these payloads, some of which weighed many tons,
-were not what someone would typically envision as being associated with
-a balloon. Examples of payloads flown in New Mexico by Air Force high
-altitude balloons can be found on pages 52 and 53 at the end of this
-section.
-
-Research projects of the late 1940’s and 1950’s conducted at Holloman
-AFB which began with the Project MOGUL flights in June 1947, covered
-a wide spectrum of scientific research. One important experiment
-in space biology measured the effects of exposure to cosmic ray
-particles on living tissues.[80] Other projects gathered meteorological
-data and collected air samples to determine the composition of the
-atmosphere.[81] The first high altitude photographic reconnaissance
-project, a forerunner to today’s reconnaissance satellites, Project
-119L, also used high altitude balloons launched at Holloman AFB.[82]
-
-As early as May 1948, polyethylene balloons coated or laminated with
-aluminum were flown from Holloman AFB and the surrounding area.[83]
-Beginning in August 1955, large numbers of these balloons were flown
-as targets in the development of radar guided air to air missiles.[84]
-Various accounts of the “Roswell Incident” often described thin,
-metal-like materials that when wadded into a ball, returned to their
-original shape. These accounts are consistent with the properties of
-polyethylene balloons laminated with aluminum. These balloons were
-typically launched from points west of the White Sands Proving Ground,
-floated over the range as targets, and descended in the areas northeast
-of White Sands Proving Ground where the “strange” materials were
-allegedly found.
-
-In 1958 the first manned stratospheric balloon flights were made from
-Holloman AFB (see page 102). In 1960, balloon tests of components of
-the first U. S. reconnaissance satellite were also flown at Holloman
-AFB. In the 1960’s, 70’s, and 80’s high altitude balloons were used
-in support of Air Force, and other U.S. Government and university
-sponsored research projects. Instrument testing of atmospheric entry
-vehicles for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
-space probes is one prominent example.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 49. Holloman Balloon Branch personnel prepare a
- polyethylene balloon laminated with aluminum to serve as a target
- for radar guided missiles over White Sands Proving Ground, N.M.
- (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-
-High Altitude Balloons and America’s First Satellite
-
- An illustration of the important contributions of the Holloman AFB
- Balloon Branch, and the necessity for a rapid recovery of a high
- altitude balloon payload, were evaluations of components of the
- first U.S. satellite-based reconnaissance system, code named CORONA.
-
- The Soviet Union had already beaten the U.S. into space with
- the launch and orbit of SPUTNIK I on October 4, 1957. The next
- achievement in the quest for space superiority were the physical
- recovery of a payload that had been in orbit.[85] The DISCOVERER
- satellite, the sensor used in the CORONA program, was to be
- propelled into orbit and then eject a capsule containing an
- American flag to enable the U.S. to claim this honor.[86]
-
- The DISCOVERER program had been plagued by failure with 10
- unsuccessful missions in 1959 and 1960. With the eyes of the nation
- watching, and the Soviets testing a similar system, more failures
- could not be tolerated. To test the faulty components of the
- DISCOVERER, U.S. Air Force high altitude balloons at Holloman AFB
- were determined to be the most expedient method of conducting the
- evaluations.
-
- In April 1960, DISCOVERER XI, on the launch pad at Vandenberg
- AFB, Calif., was put into a hold pending results of the balloon
- tests.[87] The first test at Holloman AFB on April 5th was
- unsatisfactory due to a parachute failure.[88] On April 8th, with
- pressure mounting, the Balloon Branch launched another balloon
- with the DISCOVERER capsule. This test, in which the capsule was
- dropped over White Sands Missile Range and recovered immediately,
- was a total success.[89] The results were relayed by telephone
- from the Balloon Control Center at Holloman AFB to the launch pad
- at Vandenberg AFB where the countdown resumed.[90] Despite the
- successful balloon drop, DISCOVERER XI and DISCOVERER XII were
- failures.[91] Therefore, balloon testing continued throughout the
- summer of 1960.
-
- Finally, on August 11, 1960, DISCOVERER XIII successfully ejected
- a capsule and, amid much fanfare, the first recovery of a manmade
- object that had orbited the earth was accomplished.[92] This first
- successful mission of an American satellite, made possible in part
- by Holloman AFB high altitude balloons, enabled the U.S. to beat
- the Soviets and claim the honor of the first space recovery by only
- nine days.[93]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 50. (_Left_). A Holloman Balloon Branch launch
- crew prepares a nosecone of the DISCOVERER satellite for a high
- altitude balloon flight at Holloman AFB, N.M. in April 1960. (_U.S.
- Air Force photo_) ]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 51. (_Right_). A U.S. Navy helicopter aboard
- the _USS Haiti Victory_ is shown here with the capsule from the
- DISCOVERER XIII satellite. It was recovered from the Pacific Ocean
- 330 miles northwest of Hawaii on August 11, 1960. (_U.S. Air Force
- photo_) ]
-
-The SURVEYOR (Moon), VOYAGER-MARS (Mars), VIKING (Mars), PIONEER
-(Venus), and GALILEO (Jupiter) spacecraft were tested by Air Force high
-altitude balloons before they were launched into space.
-
-=VIKING and VOYAGER-MARS Space Probes.= Examples of unusual payloads,
-not likely to be associated with balloons, were qualification trials of
-NASA’s VOYAGER-MARS and VIKING space probes. Both of these spacecraft
-looked remarkably similar to the classic dome-shaped “flying saucer.”
-
-In 1966–67 and 1972, eight of the UFO lookalikes were launched by the
-Balloon Branch from the former Roswell Army Air Field (now Roswell
-Industrial Air Center), N.M.[94] The spacecraft were transported by
-Air Force balloons to altitudes above 100,000 feet and released for a
-period of self-propelled, supersonic, free-flight prior to landing on
-the White Sands Missile Range.[95] While the origins of the “Roswell”
-scenarios cannot be specifically traced to these vehicles, their
-flying saucer-like appearance, and the fact that they were launched
-exclusively from the original “Roswell Incident” location, leaves an
-impression that perhaps these odd balloon payloads may have played
-some role in the unclear and distorted stories of at least some of the
-“Roswell” witnesses.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 52. A NASA VIKING space probe is rolled out of
- its assembly building at Martin Marietta Corporation in Denver,
- Colo. (_NASA_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 53. (_Above Left_) The aeroshell of a NASA
- VOYAGER-MARS space probe just prior to launch at Walker AFB, N.M.
- (formerly Roswell AAF). (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 54. (_Above Right_) This NASA VIKING flying
- saucer-like space probe was test flown by U. S. Air Force high
- altitude balloons in 1972 at the former Roswell Army Air Field.
- (_NASA_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 55. (_Right_) Following a supersonic test
- flight in 1972, a VIKING space probe awaits recovery at White Sands
- Missile Range, N.M. (_NASA_)]
-
-=Tethered Balloons.= The Holloman Balloon Branch, in addition to high
-altitude research activities, also conducted low altitude tethered
-balloon flights. It appears that descriptions of these balloons may
-have become part of the “Roswell Incident.”
-
-Most standard shaped tethered balloons are readily identified when near
-the ground or when the tether is visible. Other experimental tethered
-balloons are not so easily identified. During the 1960s, Balloon Branch
-personnel flew experimentally shaped tethered balloons from deep
-canyons of central New Mexico. To a distant observer, from a vantage
-point above the canyon rim, where the tether and ground anchors are
-not visible, an experimental tethered balloon might lead some persons
-to speculate as to the oddly shaped balloon’s origin and purpose. One
-design of a low altitude tethered balloon may have inspired at least
-one account of an “alien” craft. In _The Truth About the UFO Crash at
-Roswell_, the authors published a drawing of a crashed alien spaceship
-allegedly based on a drawing given to them by an anonymous witness.[96]
-When this drawing is compared to a photograph of an experimental
-tethered balloon flown at Holloman AFB in March 1965, the similarities
-are undeniable.[97] The tethered balloon and the NASA space probes are
-just two examples of the uncommon technologies that were flown in New
-Mexico by the Holloman Balloon Branch.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 56. (_Left_) A drawing from a popular UFO
- book, _The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell_, depicts an alien
- spacecraft allegedly drawn by an anonymous witness. (_The Truth
- About the UFO Crash at Roswell_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 57. (_Right_) A tethered “Vee” balloon shown
- here at Holloman AFB, N.M. in March 1965. This experimental
- balloon, is strikingly similar to the “alien” craft. (_U.S. Air
- Force photo_)]
-
-Today, the Air Force maintains a reduced but still highly capable
-high altitude balloon program at Holloman AFB. The Space and Missile
-Command, Test and Evaluation Unit (SMC/TE, OL-AC) represents the sole
-Department of Defense high altitude research balloon capability. The
-ability of a U.S. Air Force high altitude balloon to lift a scientific
-payload to more than 100,000 feet, above 99 per cent of the earth’s
-atmosphere, for days at a time, presents a profoundly useful scientific
-tool at a fraction of the cost of a space research platform. Recent
-tests that utilized Holloman balloons included atmospheric sampling
-and gravity measurement experiments, high altitude astronomic studies,
-weapons systems evaluations, and gamma ray detection experiments. While
-most tests continue to be launched from the permanent balloon launch
-facility at Holloman AFB, U.S. Air Force balloon crews have recently
-launched balloons from numerous field locations in the U.S. (including
-two sites in Roswell), as well as Alaska, Panama, and Antarctica.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 58. Present members of the Holloman Balloon
- Branch in front of the Balloon Operations Center, Building 850, at
- Holloman AFB, N.M., (_from left_) TSgt. Roger J. Welch, Mr. Joseph
- Fumerola, Mr. Alvin W. Hodges, Mr. Joseph Longshore, MSgt. Ray A.
- Pitts, Sr., Amn. John Witkop, and Mr. Harvey L. Harris. (_U.S. Air
- Force photo_)]
-
-
-Balloon and Payload Recoveries
-
-UFO theorists support their claims of an extraordinary occurrence in
-the New Mexico desert by describing mysterious U.S. military personnel,
-operating a variety of vehicles and aircraft that always seem to
-arrive shortly after the crash of a “flying saucer.” When carefully
-scrutinized, the descriptions of the mystery crews, their equipment,
-methods, and the areas where the recoveries allegedly occurred—in
-targeted high altitude balloon recovery areas—indicates that Holloman
-Balloon Branch activities were most likely responsible for the claims.
-
-To successfully recover high altitude balloons, balloon recovery
-technicians regularly ventured far from Holloman AFB. In most instances
-the balloons and their scientific payloads were recovered from
-predetermined recovery areas. These regularly targeted areas, located
-in Arizona, West Texas, and New Mexico, included the area surrounding
-Roswell.[98] From 1947 to the present, the Roswell area has been the
-site of hundreds of balloon and payload recoveries (including those
-that carried anthropomorphic dummies).[99]
-
-The regularly targeted areas were the result of the evolution of high
-altitude balloon control techniques developed at Holloman AFB. These
-techniques were based on meteorological, geographical, and operational
-conditions that exist in New Mexico. These factors, combined with ample
-amounts of skill and experience of balloon controllers at Holloman AFB,
-determined the impact points of Holloman high altitude balloons.
-
-Many of the procedures used to position Air Force balloons are
-described in _General Philosophy and Techniques of Balloon Control_,
-and _Meteorological Aspects of Constant-Level Balloon Operations in
-the Southwestern United States_, both by Bernard D. Gildenberg (see
-statement in Appendix B).[100] Gildenberg served as the Holloman
-Balloon Branch Meteorologist, Engineer, and Physical Science
-Administrator from 1951 until 1981. During this period, Gildenberg, a
-recognized world expert in upper atmospheric wind patterns, pioneered
-methods to launch, control, track, and recover high altitude balloons.
-Many of these methods are still used today by the U.S. Air Force and by
-research organizations throughout the world.
-
-
-Interaction with Civilians
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 59. Bernard D. “Duke” Gildenberg (_center_)
- Balloon Branch Meteorologist, is shown here in May 1957 in front
- of the MAN HIGH I gondola. With Gildenberg are MAN HIGH I pilot
- Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. (_left_), and MAN HIGH project
- scientist/pilot, Lt. Col. David G. Simons (MC). When Gildenberg
- attempted to inform UFO theorists that high altitude balloon
- projects were likely responsible for some of the UFO claims, his
- explanations were rejected, _see also_ pages 8 & 9. (_U.S. Air
- Force photo_)]
-
-In several accounts, unsubstantiated allegations have been made
-that military personnel who retrieved equipment from rural areas of
-New Mexico intimidated and threatened civilians. Contrary to these
-charges, Balloon Branch personnel enjoyed good relations with the
-local community and often solicited their assistance in the area of a
-balloon or payload landing. In the flat, featureless desert areas of
-southeastern New Mexico near Roswell, the parachutes, payloads, the
-balloons themselves, and circling chase aircraft often drew crowds of
-curious onlookers from the local community. In fact, so many civilians
-were often present at balloon or payload landing sites, the scene was
-described by longtime civilian Balloon Branch recovery supervisor,
-Robert Blankenship, as being like the “circus coming to town.”[101]
-
-Allegations that civilians were threatened or told to “forget what they
-saw” are profoundly inaccurate. Threats, intimidation, or other types
-of misconduct by Balloon Branch personnel would have served no purpose
-since without the cooperation of local persons, many recoveries would
-not have been possible.[102]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 60. (_Right_) This ranch family assisted in the
- recovery of a Project STARGAZER high altitude balloon payload and
- is shown here with a panel from the unmanned gondola. (_U.S. Air
- Force photo_)]
-
-Most balloon recoveries were coordinated in advance with local
-law enforcement agencies.[103] If a balloon or payload landed on
-private property and the owner could not be located, Balloon Branch
-operating instructions dictated that the local sheriff or police
-must be contacted.[104] In situations where local persons arrived at
-balloon landing sites before the recovery crews, they were simply
-asked to “step back” to allow recovery personnel to secure the
-balloon equipment.[105] If these persons inquired as to the purpose
-of a balloon flight, they were informed by technicians that it was a
-U.S. Air Force scientific study and were given a telephone number at
-Holloman AFB if they required additional information. At Holloman AFB,
-individuals qualified to answer detailed questions responded to these
-inquiries. There was never a reason to mislead or threaten individuals
-who observed balloon operations. Relations with local citizens were
-good, and Balloon Branch personnel and equipment were a common sight to
-residents in areas with high incidences of balloon operations.
-
-In a few instances, situations arose when persons not familiar with the
-procedures and equipment used by the Balloon Branch misunderstood their
-activities. Such misunderstandings occurred several times during the
-1970s and 1980s when recovery crews not only attracted the attention of
-local citizens while coordinating balloon recoveries, but also drew the
-attention of federal law enforcement agencies.[106]
-
-Checks with the local sheriff revealed that the trucks and circling
-aircraft in the desert near Roswell were part of a balloon recovery
-mission, and not a drug smuggling operation. Apparently, balloon
-recoveries appeared to be something suspicious even to federal agents.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 61. A typical Holloman Balloon Branch recovery
- crew is shown here with a man known as “The hermit” who assisted
- them in a balloon recovery northwest of Silver City, N.M. in the
- 1960s. (_photo collection of Robert Blankenship_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 62. A mule (named Ida) was borrowed from a
- local rancher when a balloon payload landed in difficult terrain 20
- miles north of Wickenburg, Ariz. in October 1966. (_U.S. Air Force
- photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 63. On occasion, Air Force balloon recovery
- crews rented or borrowed equipment from local residents. This
- bulldozer was rented for one recovery in the Sacramento mountains
- west of Roswell. (_photo collection of Robert Blankenship_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 64. Balloon Branch vehicle at roadside café.
- This M-43 ¾-ton field ambulance, converted by the Holloman Balloon
- Branch into a communications vehicle, was a common sight in the
- areas surrounding Roswell during the 1950s and early 1960s. (_photo
- collection of Ole Jorgeson_)]
-
- [Illustration: Figs. 65 & 66. Examples of unusual payloads flown by
- Air Force high altitude balloons at Holloman AFB, N.M. (_U.S. Air
- Force photos_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 67. (_Left_) This U.S. Army communications
- payload was flown at Holloman AFB, N.M. on September 30, 1976.
- (_U.S. Army photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 68. (_Right_) Payload launched by an Air Force
- high altitude balloon from Holloman AFB, N. M. on March 20, 1965.
- This payload was a scientific experiment for The Johns Hopkins
- University Astrophysics Laboratory. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 69. High altitude balloon payload launched from
- Holloman AFB on September 14, 1976. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-
-
-
- 1.4
- Comparison of Witnesses Accounts to U.S. Air Force Activities
-
-
-Were they aliens or dummies? This question can be answered by comparing
-witness testimony and the Air Force projects of the 1950s, HIGH
-DIVE and EXCELSIOR. Both of these projects employed anthropomorphic
-dummies flown by high altitude balloons and appeared to satisfy the
-requirements of the previously established research profile:
-
- _a._ An activity that if viewed from a distance would appear
- unusual.
-
- _b._ An activity for which the exact date was not likely to have
- been known because many dummies were dropped over a six-year period
- (1953–1959).
-
- _c._ An activity that took place in many areas of rural New Mexico.
-
- _d._ An activity that involved a type of aerial vehicle with
- dummies that had four fingers, were bald and wore one-piece gray
- suits.
-
- _e._ An activity that required recovery by numerous military
- personnel and an assortment of vehicles that included a wrecker, a
- six-by-six, and a weapons carrier.
-
-The testimony used in the following comparison, an undocumented mixture
-of firsthand and secondhand re-countings, are the actual statements,
-not the interpretations of UFO proponents, that are presented to
-“prove” the Earth was visited by extraterrestrial beings and the U.S.
-Air Force has covered up this fact since 1947. This comparison is
-augmented by references to photographs whenever possible to illustrate
-the undeniable similarities between the descriptions provided by the
-witnesses and the equipment and methods employed by the Air Force
-projects.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 70. Project HIGH DIVE anthropomorphic dummy
- launch. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-
-
-
- “Crash” Site 1
- (Allegedly North of Roswell)
-
-
-This summarized account is the basis for the alleged “flying saucer”
-crash site north of Roswell.[*] The exact location is not known since
-the witness, Mr. James Ragsdale, in two separate sworn statements, has
-described two different sites, many miles apart.[107] This account was
-excerpted from an interview with Mr. Ragsdale by author Donald Schmitt.
-A transcript of the complete interview is included in Appendix C.
-
-[*] In _The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell_ (Avon Books, 1994, p.
-131), the authors provided a corroborating account for this testimony
-from a 96-year-old man who was in ill health, whose interview was not
-tape recorded, and has since died. According to the book, the man’s
-“wife and daughter said that he was easily confused” and “memories of
-his life were jumbled and reordered.”
-
-
-The Account
-James Ragsdale
-
-“_They was using dummies in those damned things_”[108]
-
-Testimony attributed to Ragsdale, who is deceased, states that he and
-a friend were camping one evening and saw something fall from the sky.
-The next morning, when they went to investigate, they saw a crash site:
-
-“One part [of the craft] was kind of buried in the ground and one part
-of it was sticking our [out] of the ground.” “I’m sure that [there] was
-bodies ... either bodies or dummies.” “The federal government could
-have been doing something they didn’t want anyone to know what this
-was. They was using dummies in those damned things ... they could use
-remote control ... but it was either dummies or bodies or something
-laying there. They looked like bodies. They were not very long ...
-[not] over four or five foot long at the most.” “We didn’t see their
-faces or nothing like that ... we had just gotten to the site and the
-Army ... and all [was] coming and we got into a damned jeep and took
-off.”
-
-This testimony then describes an assortment of military vehicles used
-to recover the “bodies”: “It was two or three six-by-six Army trucks a
-wrecker and everything. Leading the pack was a '47 Ford car with guys
-in it.... It was six or eight big trucks besides the pickup, weapons
-carriers and stuff like that.” Ragsdale also said that before he left
-the area he observed the military personnel “gathering stuff up” and
-“they cleaned everything all up.”
-
-
-Assessment
-
-In his testimony, Ragsdale made numerous references to equipment,
-vehicles, and procedures consistent with documented anthropomorphic
-dummy recoveries for projects HIGH DIVE and EXCELSIOR. The repeated
-use of the term “dummy” and the witness’ own admission that “they was
-using dummies in those damned things” and “I’m sure that was bodies ...
-either bodies or dummies” leaves little doubt that what he described
-was an anthropomorphic dummy recovery.
-
-Based on testimony attributed to this witness, the confusion could
-have resulted from the fact that he observed these activities from a
-distance. If the witness was even a short distance from the odd looking
-anthropomorphic dummies, it would be logical for him to believe, when
-interviewed 35 to 40 years after the event, that he “thought they were
-dummies or bodies or something.” Also, for some of the high altitude
-drops, the dummies did not separate from the suspension rack and
-“rode the rack” to the ground without deployment of a parachute.[109]
-If the parachutes of the dummies or parachutes of the rack assembly
-did not deploy (a common occurrence during the early dummy drops),
-then they free-fell from up to 98,000 feet.[110] As a result of these
-malfunctions, the arms and legs of the dummies were often separated
-from the body on impact.[111] This may account for the witness’
-description of bodies [not] “over four or five foot” tall.
-
-Another portion of his testimony suggesting that the witness observed
-an Air Force high altitude balloon and dummy recovery was the
-statement: “The federal government could have been doing something
-because they didn’t want anyone to know what this was ... they was
-using dummies in those damned things ... they could use remote
-control.” Balloon controllers used remote control to relay commands to
-the balloon control package to valve gas and drop ballast.[112] The
-dummies themselves were also dropped from the suspension rack by remote
-control.[113]
-
-[Illustration: Fig. 71. Numerous vehicles and various types
-of equipment, were often present at high altitude balloon and
-anthropomorphic dummy launch and recovery locations. (photo collection
-of Ole Jorgeson) ]
-
-The witness also described a Balloon Branch procedure that required the
-area of a balloon or payload landing to be restored to its original
-condition. It was evident in the statements “They cleaned everything
-all up” and “They began gathering the stuff up.” Thoroughly cleaning
-a balloon or dummy landing site and removing any debris deposited
-there was a standard procedure to maintain good community relations and
-avoid legal claims that could arise over property damages or livestock
-losses.[114] Cattle were known to ingest scraps of polyethylene balloon
-material that sometimes littered entire fields following a balloon
-failure or flight termination.[115]
-
-The military vehicles described were also consistent with recovery
-and communications vehicles used during the 1950s to retrieve
-anthropomorphic dummies and suspension racks.[116] The witness stated
-he saw a “wrecker,” a “six-by-six,” a “weapons carrier,” a “'47 Ford
-car,” and a “pickup.” The “wrecker” was most likely a M-342 5-ton
-wrecker that was assigned to the Balloon Branch for launch and recovery
-operations.[117] Other vehicles described were also the type used to
-launch and recover anthropomorphic dummies. The “six-by-six” is a
-likely reference to a M-35 2½-ton cargo truck; “weapons carriers” were
-the common name of a Dodge M-37 ¾-ton utility truck. References to
-“the pickup” and a “'47 Ford car,” were likely descriptions of other
-civilian and military vehicles often present at high altitude balloon
-launch and recovery locations.
-
-
-
-
- “Crash” Site 2
- (Allegedly 175 miles Northwest of Roswell)
-
-
-This purported flying saucer “crash” site is allegedly 175 miles
-northwest of Roswell in an area of New Mexico known as the San Agustin
-Plains.[118] The contention that a flying saucer crashed at this
-location and was recovered by the U.S. military is supported by three
-principal testimonies, two secondhand and one firsthand.
-
-
-The Secondhand Accounts
-
-These accounts were related by Mr. Vern Maltais and Ms. Alice Knight,
-who were acquainted with the alleged original eyewitness, Mr. Grady
-L. Barnett, who is deceased. Unless otherwise noted, the following
-statements appeared on footage used to prepare a video, _Recollections
-of Roswell Part II_, by The Fund for UFO Research (see Appendix C).
-
-
-Alice Knight
-
-“_I don’t recall the date_”[119]
-
-“I don’t remember whether it was before my husband and I were married
-or after, I don’t recall the date. But he [the eyewitness] saw a UFO
-fall ... and he got nearly to the site ... but they got nearly up to
-the UFO but it was close enough that you could see some creatures.
-He said they didn’t look like human beings out there. And along came
-government cars and trucks. I guess it was government. You know it was
-a long time ago ... and they told him to go on back and forget that
-they ever saw anything, and that’s all I recall.”
-
-
-Assessment
-
-This brief testimony suggests that the witness did not know the date
-of this event. It also appears that the “creatures” were seen from a
-distance, as evidenced by the statement, “They got nearly up to the
-UFO but it was close enough that you could see some creatures.” The
-testimony also seems consistent with a description of anthropomorphic
-dummies as the witness stated they “didn’t look like human beings.”
-
-
-Vern Maltais
-
-“_Their heads were hairless ... no eyebrows, no eyelashes, no
-hair_”[120]
-
-This secondhand witness alleged that the eyewitness told him he
-observed “beings” from a “flying saucer that had burst open” that were
-“about three and a half to four feet tall, very slim ... their heads
-were hairless, with no eyebrows, no eyelashes, no hair” with “sort of
-a pear-shaped head.” He also related that “the beings were ... not
-exactly like human beings ... similar but not exactly.” He described
-that the hands of the beings “were not covered” ... and [they] only had
-“four fingers.” He also related that the clothing of the beings was
-“one-piece and gray in color”.[121] The witness concluded that “As they
-[the witnesses] were just starting to look things over really closely,
-the military moved in and gave them a briefing to not say anything
-about it.”
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 72. “Their heads were hairless ... no
- eyebrows, no eyelashes, no hair,” a likely description of Alderson
- Laboratories type anthropomorphic dummy. These Alderson dummies, of
- the same type used for Projects HIGH DIVE/EXCELSIOR, were used to
- test NASA’s APOLLO spacecraft three-man couch at Holloman AFB, N.M.
- in 1965. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-
-Assessment
-
-This description of events also indicates that the eyewitness
-apparently did not closely examine the scene and was “just starting
-to look things over” when the military arrived. As with the previous
-testimony, from a distance the dummies were likely to look, as
-described by the witness, “not exactly like humans ... similar but not
-exactly.” The description of the flying saucer that had “burst open”
-is a likely description of the dummy suspension rack that was open on
-the sides (see figures 74, 75, 76). The detailed descriptions of the
-“beings” as “about three and a half to four feet tall, very slim in
-stature ... their heads were hairless, with no eyebrows, no eyelashes,
-no hair,” with “hands that were not covered” and “had only four
-fingers,” is a likely description of an Alderson Research Laboratories
-model anthropomorphic dummy. The head of the Alderson dummy was “bald”
-and the area of the eyebrows protruded but had no “hair” (see figure
-72). Also, a distinguishing feature of the Alderson dummy, unlike the
-Sierra dummy, was that it had individual fingers not covered by gloves
-that were often damaged during the tests resulting in the loss of
-fingers (see figures 35, 73, 75).
-
-Due to the secondhand nature of these accounts, even UFO theorists were
-not convinced that this “incident” actually occurred. Corroborating
-testimony of a firsthand witness was necessary to verify these claims.
-The firsthand testimony is examined next.
-
-
-The Firsthand Account
-
-This testimony became part of the Roswell Incident in 1990 following an
-episode of the television program _Unsolved Mysteries_.[122] Following
-a dramatized re-creation on the program, persons with information
-concerning this event were encouraged to call a special toll free
-telephone number.
-
-From the outset, some UFO theorists were skeptical of this testimony
-due to the amount of detail provided from the witness who was only five
-years old in 1947. In fact, UFO organizations sponsored a conference
-in February 1992 to evaluate the testimony for authenticity.[123]
-The witness was asked to take a polygraph examination, which he
-passed.[124] Many UFO enthusiasts remained skeptical of the claims and
-denounced this testimony as “no more than a fabrication.”[125]
-
-Unless otherwise noted, two sources of testimony attributed to the
-witness have been used in this examination; interviews used to prepare
-the video _Recollections of Roswell Part II_ by the Fund for UFO
-Research (see Appendix C) and _Crash at Corona_ by Don Berliner and
-Stanton Friedman (passages from this book were used only when exact
-quotations of the witness were indicated).
-
-
-Gerald Anderson
-
-“_I thought they were plastic dolls ... I didn’t think they were
-real_”[126]
-
-Anderson related that as a five-year-old boy on an outing with his
-family in west central New Mexico, they stumbled upon the crash of
-some type of aerial vehicle.[127] When he first saw the craft he
-thought it was a “blimp.”[128] According to Anderson he “didn’t really
-get very close,”[129] but thought he saw four bandaged crewmembers
-and at first he “thought they were plastic dolls.”[130] He also
-described attempts by persons in his party to communicate with one
-of the “crewmembers.”[131] Soon after, other civilians arrived (some
-wearing pith helmets) followed by military personnel in an assortment
-of vehicles and aircraft commanded by a “redheaded captain.”[132] The
-military personnel, after “screaming and hollering” at the civilians
-“this is a military secret,” started a recovery operation of the alien
-craft and crew.[133] Anderson also recalled that the military personnel
-threatened some of the civilians with imprisonment or death before
-escorting them out of the area.[134]
-
-
-Assessment
-
-Anderson’s choice of the terms “blimp” to describe the crashed vehicle,
-and “dolls” to describe the “crew,” strongly suggests that a balloon
-with an anthropomorphic dummy payload was the foundation for this
-testimony. He also provided an abundance of supporting details that
-accurately described vehicles, aircraft, equipment, and procedures
-used by the Holloman AFB Balloon Branch to launch and recover
-anthropomorphic dummies.
-
-An aspect of this testimony that is not accurate is the alleged threats
-and intimidation of civilians by military personnel. The use of such
-heavy-handedness was not a tactic used by the Air Force. A careful
-review of official records and interviews with numerous persons
-who actively participated in and were responsible for the conduct
-of Air Force members on high altitude balloon recovery operations
-revealed that these allegations are untrue.[135] Additionally, the
-witness alleges that the military personnel were “screaming and
-hollering” “this is a military secret.”[136] This statement might lead
-uninitiated persons to believe that the witness observed something
-highly classified and that by telling everyone present that it was a
-“military secret” would somehow help it to remain so. However, logic
-dictates that if something was classified “screaming and hollering”
-it was “secret,” would compromise it and not serve to protect its
-classification. This application of logic, combined with the fact that
-the launch and recovery of anthropomorphic dummies was unclassified,
-widely publicized, and often observed by local civilians, indicates
-that the witness’ recollections are in error. There was never a reason
-to disrespect, “scream,” “holler,” or forbid any person from talking
-about the launch or recovery of anthropomorphic dummies.
-
-=The “Crewmembers.”= The statement “I thought they were plastic
-dolls” seems an odd choice of words to describe an extraterrestrial
-being and is a likely reference to an anthropomorphic dummy whose
-skin was made of plastic.[137] This description is similar to that
-of the sole witness of the other crash site, north of Roswell, who
-described the “aliens” as “dummies.”[138] Other references provided
-by this witness further indicate that anthropomorphic dummies were
-the basis for these descriptions. The heads of the “crewmembers” were
-described as “completely bald” with “no visible ears ... just a rise
-... and then a hole.”[139] This is an accurate description of Alderson
-Research Laboratories model dummies that did not have “hair” and had
-either plastic “ears” molded to the head or a circular opening where
-a “demountable ear” or additional instrumentation was attached (see
-figure 22).[140] The statement “they didn’t have a little finger,”[141]
-a detail very similar to one provided by another witness, also appears
-to be a description of dummies manufactured by Alderson Laboratories
-that were often damaged during the balloon tests resulting in the loss
-of fingers.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 73. “Some kind of container, a metal box,” was
- described as laying on the ground near the alleged aliens. This
- appears to be a reference to boxes containing electrical components
- of the remote controlled systems positioned on the top of the dummy
- suspension rack. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 74. “They looked like they had some sort of
- bandages on ’em ... over his ... arm ... around his midsection and
- partially over his shoulder”—witness description of tape and nylon
- webbing used to prevent arms and legs from flailing, and parachute
- harness that had chest and shoulder straps. Tape was also used to
- secure the removable back plate of the head (_also see figs. 29,
- 30, 73, 75_). (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-The assertion that “they were all wearing one-piece suits ... a shiny
-silverish-gray color,” “trimmed in ... maroon-like cording”[142] is
-a likely reference to a standard issue, gray, Air Force flightsuit
-used to outfit the dummies and red duct-type tape used in the tests
-that prevented air from filling the flightsuit (see fig. 30).[143] The
-recollection that “crewmembers” had “bandages”[144] on their bodies
-were likely references to tape and nylon webbing used to prevent
-flailing of a dummy’s arms and legs during tests.[145] A reference to
-a bandage “around his [the crewmember’s] midsection and partially over
-his shoulder”[146] is a likely reference to the standard B-4 or B-5
-parachute with chest and shoulder straps worn by the dummies.[147]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 75. “Its uniform was torn in a couple spots ...
- their uniforms were in pretty sad shape”—witnesses description of
- secondhand flightsuits that were used repeatedly on tests; tears
- and other damage were common. In this photo, 1st Lt. Raymond A.
- Madson “rigs” a dummy to its suspension rack for project HIGH DIVE
- at Holloman AFB, N.M. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 76. A witness described at least one person
- at a “crash” site wearing a pith helmet. In the 1950s, the pith
- helmet was part of the Air Force uniform and was often worn on
- balloon launches and recoveries. In this publicity photo from _On
- the Threshold of Space_, Air Force members at Holloman AFB who were
- extras in the film can be seen wearing pith helmets. (_also see
- figure 49_)]
-
-=The “Craft.”= In what appears to be a clear reference to a balloon,
-was that when he saw the crashed vehicle he “thought it was a
-blimp.”[148] Additional descriptions of cables that “went from one
-kind of a package of components to another kind of package” and a
-“metal box” were likely references to the balloon control package that
-was positioned on top of the dummy suspension rack.[149] A further
-reference to a balloon payload is the statement that on a hot New
-Mexico day the crashed vehicle was “ice cold, it felt like it just
-came out of the freezer.”[150] This accurately describes a physical
-condition known as “cold soaking” common to high altitude payloads
-that had recently been exposed to sub-zero temperatures of the upper
-atmosphere.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 77. “An observation aircraft ... a high-winged
- aircraft”—a witness’s probable reference to a U.S. Air Force L-20
- aircraft used extensively by Holloman AFB crews to track and
- recover anthropomorphic dummies. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 78. Described as present at a flying saucer
- “crash” site was a C-47 aircraft. This is a probable reference to
- a U.S. Air Force C-47 transport aircraft used to move equipment to
- launch sites distant from Holloman AFB. These aircraft were also
- used for aerial tracking of high altitude balloon flights including
- those that flew anthropomorphic dummies. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-=Military Aircraft.= The witness also described two aircraft of the
-same type used for anthropomorphic dummy recoveries as having been
-involved in the activity he witnessed. One aircraft was described as
-a “C-47” and another as an “observation aircraft ... a high-winged
-aircraft.”[151] These were a C-47 and a L-20 aircraft used extensively
-by the Balloon Branch during the mid 1950s for tracking and recovering
-anthropomorphic dummy balloon flights.[152] This testimony also
-described aircraft that were typically overhead during a recovery and
-an established procedure of landing on a rural road or in a field to
-reach isolated balloon launch or recovery locations.[153]
-
-=Military Vehicles.= Numerous military vehicles, several of which
-were described by other witnesses as having been at the other crash
-site north of Roswell, were also described. Witnesses at the two
-different sites described a “wrecker” and a “six-by-six,” both of the
-type used for anthropomorphic dummy recoveries.[154] The account also
-described two vehicles unique to the Balloon Branch that were used for
-the majority of high altitude balloon recoveries during the mid- to
-late-1950s.
-
-The witness described a “jeep-like truck that had a bunch of radios
-in it”.... There was a guy sittin’ in there wearin’ earphones and he
-was talking on the radio.“[155] This is a likely description of a
-Dodge M-37 ¾-ton utility truck, known as a weapons carrier, that had
-been specially modified to carry radio equipment for balloon recovery
-operations. The Holloman AFB Balloon Branch modified these vehicles
-in 1953, ruling out the possibility that the witness observed them in
-1947, when such vehicles were not available to organizations performing
-balloon operations.[156] The other vehicle described and used by the
-Balloon Branch were “military ambulances.”[157] During the mid-1950s,
-the Balloon Branch modified three M-43 ¾-ton ambulances for use as
-balloon recovery and communications vehicles.[158] These vehicles were
-used for anthropomorphic dummy launch and recovery missions to relay
-messages to circling recovery aircraft and the balloon operations
-center at Holloman AFB.[159] The witness also described “a trailer with
-a motor on it, like a generator.”[160] This@ is a likely description
-of a 1½-ton cargo trailer with an MB-19 15 Kilowatt diesel generator.
-These generators were used primarily on balloon launch sites during the
-1950s and 1960s (see fig. 71).
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 79. “Stretching stuff out on the ground,
- dragging stuff out of trucks”—a likely witness reference to high
- altitude balloon inflation procedure that required the balloon to
- be stretched out on a protective ground cloth prior to inflation.
- (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-=Balloon Branch Procedures.= Descriptions of military personnel
-“stretching stuff out on the ground, dragging stuff out of trucks”[161]
-is a likely description of a balloon launch procedure that required
-the fragile polyethylene balloon and its protective ground cloth to
-be removed from a launch vehicle and laid out on the ground prior to
-inflation. Another procedure described by the witness was an apparent
-reference to a balloon recovery practice of recording the names of
-civilians who observed high altitude balloon recoveries.[162] The
-witness stated that military personnel “took everybody’s name and
-everything,”[163] which was a procedure to ensure payment of a $25
-dollar reward to persons who assisted in the recovery. This procedure
-was also necessary to settle future claims of property damage caused by
-the balloon, payload, or recovery vehicles.[164]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 80. Witnesses described a “tanker,” “military
- ambulances,” a “6 × 6,” and a “wrecker”—probable references to
- (_from left_) a helium tank trailer, a M-43 ambulance (converted to
- a communications vehicle), a M-35 cargo truck (partially obscured),
- and a M-342 wrecker. These vehicles were used for off-range launch
- and recovery operations of anthropomorphic dummies for Project HIGH
- DIVE/EXCELSIOR. Shown here is a May 29, 1957 dummy launch near
- Hatch, N.M. (_also see figs. 23, 28, 64, 71, 81_). (_U.S. Air Force
- photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 81. Scene typical of a mid- to late 1950s
- off-range high altitude balloon launch. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-
- Summary
-
-When the claims offered by UFO theorists to prove that an
-extraterrestrial spaceship and crew crashed and were recovered by the
-U.S. Air Force are compared to documented Air Force activities, it is
-reasonable to conclude, with a high degree of certainty, that the two
-“crashes” were actually descriptions of a launch or recovery of a high
-altitude balloon and anthropomorphic dummies. This conclusion was based
-on the remarkable similarities and independent corroboration between
-the witnesses who described _both_ of the “crash sites.” Statements
-such as “they was using dummies in those damned things” and a
-characterization of the crashed vehicle as, “I thought it was a blimp”
-are two of the many similarities. The extensive detailed descriptions
-provided by the witnesses, too numerous to be coincidental, were of
-the equipment, vehicles, procedures, and personnel of the Air Force
-research organizations who conducted the scientific experiments HIGH
-DIVE and EXCELSIOR.
-
-Though it is clear anthropomorphic dummies were responsible for these
-accounts, the specific locations of the events described was difficult,
-if not impossible, to determine since the witnesses were not specific.
-A witness to the “crash site” north of Roswell, Mr. James Ragsdale,
-was not certain of the actual location as evidenced by a change in
-his sworn testimony that moved the site many miles from its original
-location.[165]
-
-However, since Ragsdale reportedly lived or worked in the Roswell,
-Artesia, and Carlsbad, N.M. areas during the period when the dummies
-were used, it is likely he described one or more of the nine documented
-dummy recoveries in areas near there.
-
-Reports of the other crash site, allegedly 175 miles northwest of
-Roswell on the San Agustin Plains, is likely based on descriptions of
-more than one launch and recovery of anthropomorphic dummies. Since
-one witness, Gerald Anderson, described procedures consistent with the
-launch _and_ recovery of high altitude balloons, it is likely that he
-witnessed both of these activities, with at least one that included an
-anthropomorphic dummy payload.
-
-The two secondhand witnesses to this “crash,” Vern Maltais and Alice
-Knight, could have related descriptions from any of the dummy launch
-or landing sites. However, Maltais and Knight repeatedly described the
-impact location of the flying saucer as on the San Agustin Plains.
-One possible explanation is that the witnesses, in the 30 or more
-years since they were told the story by the original eyewitness, Mr.
-Barney Barnett, a soil conservation engineer who reportedly traveled
-extensively throughout New Mexico, may have confused San Agustin
-Plains with San Agustin Pass or San Agustin Peak, an area in the San
-Agustin Mountains of New Mexico. These areas are just outside the
-boundary of the White Sands Missile Range and the adjacent Jornada
-Test Range. Numerous anthropomorphic dummy balloon flights terminated
-and were recovered in this area. Furthermore, if the civilians
-witnessed dummy landings on either the White Sands Missile Range or the
-Jornada Test Range, both test areas and restricted U.S. Government
-reservations, then this explains why they may have been told to leave
-the landing site. In the popular Roswell scenarios, witnesses were
-allegedly instructed by military personnel to leave the area because
-they witnessed something of a highly classified nature. This would
-be unlikely since the witnesses described projects that utilized
-anthropomorphic dummies which were unclassified. It is likely, however,
-that if the witnesses ventured onto one of these ranges they were
-instructed to leave, not because of classified activities, but for
-their own safety.
-
-These conclusions are supported by official files, technical reports,
-extensive photographic documentation, and the recollections of numerous
-former and retired Air Force members and civilian employees who
-conducted Projects HIGH DIVE and EXCELSIOR. The descriptions examined
-here, provided by UFO theorists themselves, were so remarkably—and
-redundantly—similar to these Air Force projects that the only
-reasonable conclusion can be that the witnesses described these
-activities. These many similarities are summarized in Table 1.1.
-
-The next section will examine the accounts of “aliens” at the hospital
-at Roswell Army Air Field. As previously stated, due to the lack of
-general or detailed similarities with testimony of the two rural “crash
-sites,” the hospital account was determined not to be associated with
-these reports.
-
-[Illustration: Fig. 82.]
-
-
- Table 1.1
-
- Comparison of Testimony to Actual Air Force Equipment, Vehicles, and
- Procedures Used to Launch and Recover Anthropomorphic Dummies
-
- Notes:
-
- “Crash Site” 1—Site North of Roswell
-
- “Crash Site” 2—Site 175 miles Northwest of Roswell
-
- Shaded areas indicates corroboration between witnesses.
-
- Boxed shaded areas indicates corroboration between witnesses at
- different “crash” sites.
-
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Air Force
- Witness Description Equipment/Procedure “Crash Site”
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- =The “Aliens”=
- +--------------------------+
- 1. “They was using dummies in |Reference to | Site 1
- those damned things.”[166] |anthropomorphic dummies |
- _Ragsdale_ |(figs. 11, 14, 21–22, 29, |
- |30–33, 35, 40, 72–75, 45).|
- +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 2. “I thought they were |Reference to | Site 2
- plastic dolls”[167] |anthropomorphic dummies |
- _Anderson_ |that had plastic skin. |
- +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 3. “an experimental plane with |Reference to | Site 1
- dummies in it”[168] |anthropomorphic dummies. |
- _Kaufman_ +--------------------------+
-
-
- +--------------------------+
- 4. “I’m sure that was bodies |Reference to | Site 1
- ... either bodies or |anthropomorphic dummies. |
- dummies.”[169] +--------------------------+
- _Ragsdale_
-
- +--------------------------+
- 5. “it was either dummies or |Reference to | Site 1
- bodies or something laying |anthropomorphic dummies. |
- there.”[170] +--------------------------+
- _Ragsdale_
-
- +--------------------------+
- 6. “his eyes was open, staring |Reference to | Site 2
- blankly”[171] |anthropomorphic dummy. |
- _Anderson_ +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 7. “not exactly like human |Reference to | Site 2
- beings ... similar, but not |anthropomorphic dummies. |
- exactly.”[172] +--------------------------+
- _Maltais_
-
- +--------------------------+
- 8. “didn’t look like human |Reference to | Site 2
- beings”[173] |anthropomorphic dummies. |
- _Knight_ +--------------------------+
-
- 9. “they didn’t have a little Reference to Alderson Site 2
- finger”[174] Laboratories dummy that
- _Anderson_ were reused many times and
- were often damaged but
- remained in service.
- (figs. 35, 73, 75).
-
- 10. “they had four Corroboration of Site 2
- fingers”[175] description #9. See above.
- _Maltais_
-
- +--------------------------+
- 11. [the beings were] “three |Likely description of | Site 2
- and a half to four feet |anthropomorphic dummy |
- tall”[176] |missing legs after fall |
- _Maltais_ |from altitude. |
- +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 12. [the beings were] “four |Corroboration of | Site 2
- foot tall, four and a half |description #11. See |
- feet tall.”[177] |above. |
- _Anderson_ +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 13. “they weren’t over four or |Corroboration of | Site 1
- five foot long at the |description #11. See |
- most.”[178] |above. |
- _Ragsdale_ +--------------------------+
-
- 14. “Their skin coloration ... Probable description of a Site 2
- [was] a bluish tinted milky “Sierra Sam” dummy with
- white”[179] pale white “skin” (fig. 21).
- _Anderson_
-
- 15. “their heads were Anthropomorphic dummies Site 2
- hairless ... no eyebrows, did not have “hair” (figs.
- no eyelashes, no hair”[180] 21, 22, 36–38, 40).
- _Maltais_
-
- 16. “no hair ... completely Corroboration of Site 2
- bald”[181] description #15. See above.
- _Anderson_
-
- 17. “no visible ears ... just Dummies had ears that were Site 2
- a rise there and then a molded to their heads with
- hole”[182] openings for placement of
- _Anderson_ instruments (fig. 22).
-
- 18. “The hands were not Reference to Alderson dummy Site 2
- covered”[183] which did not have gloves on
- _Maltais_ hands (figs. 35, 73–75).
-
- 19. “they were all wearing one Reference to gray flight Site 2
- piece suits ... a shiny suits worn by the dummies
- silverish gray color”[184] for some of the tests (figs.
- _Anderson_ 14, 29, 30).
-
- 20. “Their clothing seemed to Corroboration of description Site 2
- be one piece and gray in #19. See above.
- color.”[185]
- _Maltais_
-
- 21. “It’s uniform was torn in Dummy uniforms were often Site 2
- a couple spots ... their secondhand, rips and other
- uniforms were in pretty sad defects were common but
- shape.”[186] they remained in service
- _Anderson_ (fig. 75).
-
- 22. “Around the collar it [the Reference to red duct tape Site 2
- suit] was trimmed in ... used to prevent air from
- maroon-like cording”[187] filling the dummy’s
- _Anderson_ flightsuit (figs. 29, 30).
-
- 23. “They looked like they Reference to tape and nylon Site 2
- had some sort of bandages webbing used to prevent
- on ’em ... over his [the arms and legs of dummy
- crewmember’s] arm.”[188] from flailing. Tape was also
- _Anderson_ used to secure the removable
- back plate of head (figs. 29,
- 30, 35, 72–75).
-
- 24. [bandages] “around his Reference to parachute Site 2
- midsection and partially over harness that had chest and
- his shoulder”[189] shoulder straps.
- _Anderson_
-
- =The “Craft”=
-
- 25. “It [the crewmember] felt Description of a high Site 2
- dead when I touched it, it was altitude balloon payload that
- very cold.”[190] was cold soaked at sub zero
- _Anderson_ temperatures of the upper
- atmosphere.
-
- 26. “it was a dirigible, a Reference to a partially Site 2
- that had crashed”[191] inflated or deflated high
- blimp altitude balloon (figs. 23,
- _Anderson_ 70).
-
- 27. “a flying saucer that had Reference to the dummy Site 2
- burst open”[192] suspension rack that did not
- _Maltais_ have sides (figs. 35, 73–75).
-
- 28. “clusters of thread-like Numerous cables and wires Site 2
- material in the form of a were used in the dummy
- cable”[193] instrumentation kits and
- _Anderson_ balloon control package.
-
- 29. “others of those [cables] Both balloon control package Site 2
- went from one kind of package and dummy instrumentation
- of components to another kind kits were connected by cables
- of package”[194] (fig. 73).
- _Anderson_
-
- 30. “some kind of container, Reference to balloon control Site 2
- a metal box”[195] package or dummy
- _Anderson_ instrumentation kit (fig. 73).
-
- 31. “it was ice cold, it felt Condition of a balloon Site 2
- like it just came out of a payload after it has been
- freezer”[196] “cold soaked” in the upper
- _Anderson_ atmosphere at temperatures
- far below zero.
-
- =Vehicles=
-
- +--------------------------+
- 32. a “jeep-like truck that had |Reference to a modified | Site 2
- a bunch of radios in it and two |M-37 ¾-ton utility |
- big antennas.... There was a |truck commonly referred to|
- guy sittin’ in there wearin’ |as a weapons carrier, |
- earphones and he was talking |unique to the Balloon |
- on the radio.”[197] |Branch. One of the primary|
- _Anderson_ |vehicles used by recovery |
- |crews. Balloons were |
- |tracked by direction |
- |finding gear and required |
- |a radio operator to wear |
- |headphones (fig. 32). |
- +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 33. “weapons carriers”[198] |Corroboration of | Site 1
- _Ragsdale_ |description #32. See |
- |above. |
- +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 34. “six by six Army |Reference to M-35 | Site 1
- trucks”[199] |2½-ton cargo truck used |
- _Ragsdale_ |to transport dummies and |
- |suspension racks for |
- |launch and recoveries |
- |(fig. 31). |
- +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 35. “six by [six] ... military |Corroboration of | Site 2
- truck with canvas ... wagon |description #34. See |
- type ... thing over it”[200] |above. |
- _Anderson_ +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 36. “wreckers [with] cranes |Reference to M-246 wrecker| Site 2
- on ’em”[201] |used to launch and recover|
- _Anderson_ |anthropomorphic dummy |
- |payloads (figs. 23, 28, |
- |70). |
- +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 37. “a wrecker”[202] |Corroboration of | Site 1
- _Ragsdale_ |description #36. See |
- |above. |
- +--------------------------+
-
- 38. “there was military Reference to a converted Site 2
- ambulances”[203] M-43 ambulances used as
- _Anderson_ balloon recovery
- communications vehicles
- (figs. 64, 71, 80).
-
- 39. “the pick-up”[204] Pick-up trucks were often Site 2
- _Anderson_ used to recover
- anthropomorphic dummies
- (figs. 71, 79).
-
- 40. “tankers, like, maybe had Reference to M-49 fuel Site 2
- fuel or water in ’em”[205] trucks used to refuel
- _Anderson_ aircraft or helium trailer
- used to inflate balloon
- (figs. 23, 70, 80, 81).
-
- +--------------------------+
- 41. “a military car”[206] |A variety of military and | Site 2
- _Anderson_ |civilian cars were often |
- |used for balloon |
- |recoveries and launches |
- |(fig. 71). |
- +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 42. “’47 Ford car”[207] |Corroboration of | Site 1
- _Ragsdale_ |description #41. See |
- |above. |
- +--------------------------+
-
- 43. “there was a jeep that was Reference to 1-ton trailer Site 2
- pulling a trailer with a motor and MB-19 15 Kilowatt
- on it, like a generator.”[208] diesel generator that were
- _Anderson_ used at balloon launch and
- recovery locations (fig.
- 71).
-
- =Aircraft=
-
- 44. “observation aircraft ... Reference to an L-20 Site 2
- high winged aircraft”[209] aircraft, primary “chase”
- _Anderson_ aircraft used for balloon
- recovery in the mid 1950s
- (fig. 77).
-
- 45. “C-47 sittin’ there” [on C-47 aircraft were often Site 2
- the road][210] used on dummy launch and
- _Anderson_ recovery operations (fig.
- 78).
-
- =Procedures=
-
- 46. “The federal government Reference to balloon borne Site 1
- could have been doing anthropomorphic dummies
- something because they didn’t that were dropped by remote
- want anyone to know what this control by balloon
- was ... they was using dummies controllers at Holloman AFB
- in those damned things ... they
- could use remote control”[211]
- _Ragsdale_
-
- 47. “they took everybody’s Procedure used by Balloon Site 2
- name and everything”[212] Branch to ensure payment
- _Anderson_ of $25 reward and to settle
- claims of property damage.
-
- 48. “they cleaned everything all Balloon Branch personnel Site 1
- up ... I mean they cleaned were required to remove as
- everything”[213] much debris as possible from
- _Ragsdale_ balloon and payload landing
- areas to avoid complaints
- and legal actions.
-
- +--------------------------+
- 49. “they had the road |Procedure used for | Site 2
- barricaded off”[214] |aircraft operations. |
- _Anderson_ +--------------------------+
-
- +--------------------------+
- 50. “they had the road |Corroboration of | Site 1
- sealed off”[215] |description #49. See |
- _Ragsdale_ |above. |
- +--------------------------+
-
- 51. “airplanes sitting there Established procedure to Site 2
- they had landed on the refuel an aircraft, launch
- highway”[216] a balloon from an isolated
- _Anderson_ location or recover a
- small payload near a rural
- road.
-
- 52. “there was airplanes in Reference to balloon Site 2
- the sky” [over the crash “chase” aircraft used to
- site].[217] direct ground recovery crews
- _Anderson_ to balloon impact site.
-
- 53. “stretching out cables of Reference to balloon Site 2
- some kind ... they were inflation procedure that
- stretching stuff out on the required the balloon and
- ground, dragging stuff out of ground cloth to be removed
- trucks”[218] from a vehicle and laid on
- _Anderson_ the ground (fig. 79).
-*/
-
-
-
-
- SECTION TWO
-
- Reports of Bodies at the Roswell AAF Hospital
-
-
-This section examines the remaining portion of the Roswell Incident
-claims--the reports of “bodies” at the Roswell AAF hospital.
-Examinations of the various “crashed saucer” scenarios revealed
-references to the Roswell AAF hospital appeared in virtually all of
-them. Most of these were based on the account of one individual, W.
-Glenn Dennis. His undocumented and uncorroborated recollections,
-reportedly first related in 1989, over 42 years after the alleged
-Roswell Incident, are based on activities he allegedly encountered as
-a mortician providing contract services to the Roswell AAF hospital.
-Dennis’ recollections have, in turn, been interpreted by UFO theorists
-as evidence that the U.S. Army Air Forces recovered “alien” bodies and
-autopsied them at the Roswell AAF hospital in July 1947.
-
-Dennis has been described as the “star witness” and his claims as the
-most credible of the Roswell Incident.[1] This, even though his most
-sensational assertions were not based on his own experiences but on
-information allegedly related to him by unidentified mystery witnesses.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 1. The International UFO Museum and Research
- Center in Roswell, N.M. ]
-
-The mystery witnesses were allegedly an Army Air Forces nurse and a
-pediatrician both assigned to the Roswell AAF hospital in 1947.[2] To
-casual observers, this account, which contains references to actual
-U.S. Army Air Forces and U.S. Air Force personnel and activities,
-appears to have a ring of authenticity. However, when examined closely
-by Air Force researchers, the dates of events, the events themselves,
-and the people described as having participated in them, were found to
-be grossly inaccurate and totally unrelated to activities of July 1947.
-
-
-The Account
-
-The following is a summary of information provided by W. Glenn Dennis,
-who claimed he was a 22-year-old mortician at the Ballard Funeral Home
-in Roswell in July 1947, when he alleged these events occurred.[*]
-
- [*] Excerpts of interviews contained in this summary were taken
- from audio or video recordings made by persons referenced in the
- appropriate endnote. The sole exception is the interview conducted
- by Stanton T. Friedman on August 5, 1989. Quotations from this
- interview were taken from a transcript which is reportedly an
- accurate representation of the interview. Friedman has not honored
- repeated requests for an audio recording.
-
-On July 7, 1947, Dennis alleged he received a series of phone calls at
-the Ballard Funeral Home, where he worked, from the Mortuary Affairs
-officer at Roswell Army Air Field. He recalled that the mortuary
-officer inquired as to the availability of child sized caskets and
-procedures for preserving bodies that had been “laying out in the
-elements.”[3] Later that day he received an emergency ambulance call
-(the civilian mortuary for which he worked also provided an ambulance
-service) to respond to the site of a minor traffic accident in
-Roswell.[4] The accident victim was an “airman” stationed at Roswell
-AAF, and Dennis transported the airman to the hospital at the base.[5]
-
-As Dennis walked into the hospital he noticed three military box-type
-ambulances, one or more of which contained what appeared to be
-“wreckage.”[6] He described the wreckage as being inscribed with odd
-markings or symbols and bluish-purplish in color.[7] He recalled that
-some of this wreckage was resting against the inside wall of the rear
-compartment of the ambulance and two pieces of it “looked kind of like
-the bottom of a canoe.”[8] He described other wreckage on the floor of
-the ambulance as being “all sharp” and as best he could tell “was like
-broken glass.”[9] He also recalled observing Military Policemen (MPs)
-standing at the back of two of these ambulances.[10]
-
-When he went inside the hospital, he encountered a military nurse who
-was assigned there and with whom he was previously acquainted.[11] The
-nurse, who looked upset, was covering her mouth with a cloth and told
-him that “you’re going to get in a lot of trouble” and that he should
-“just get out of here.”[12] Dennis also stated that he encountered
-a military doctor who was assigned to the hospital, a pediatrician,
-with whom he was “pretty good friends” but did not speak with at that
-time.[13]
-
-Having seen the wreckage in the rear of the ambulance and believing
-there had been an accident, he asked another officer in the hospital if
-there had been a plane crash. The officer, whom Dennis had never seen
-before, asked him: “Who in the hell are you?” When he responded he was
-“from the funeral home,” the officer summoned two MPs to escort him
-from the hospital.[14]
-
-However, before Dennis and the two MPs had left the hospital, he
-heard someone say, “We’re not through with that SOB, bring him back
-here.”[15] When Dennis turned around, he observed a redheaded captain
-(in one version of these events Dennis is quoted as describing this
-person as a “big redheaded colonel”[16]) who said, “You did not see
-anything. There was no crash here. You don’t go into town making any
-rumors that you saw anything or that there was any crash ... you could
-get in a lot of trouble.”[17]
-
-Angry about being called an SOB, Dennis informed the redheaded officer
-that he was a civilian, not under his authority, and that he, the
-redheaded officer, “can’t do a damn thing to me.”[18] The redheaded
-officer was alleged to have threatened Dennis by responding “Oh yes we
-can”.... “Somebody will be picking your bones out of the sand”.... “We
-can do anything to you ... that we want to.”[19] A black sergeant, whom
-Dennis recalled had accompanied the redheaded officer, allegedly stated
-he would “make real good dog food.”[20] Following this exchange, Dennis
-claimed he was “picked up ... arm and arm” and escorted back to his
-place of business by two MPs.[21]
-
-The following day, July 8, 1947, Dennis attempted to telephone the
-nurse he had seen in the hall at the hospital to find out “what was
-going on.”[22] He stated that he was unable to reach the nurse but did
-reach another nurse, a “Captain Wilson,” who explained to him that the
-nurse he was trying to contact was not on duty, but “Wilson” would give
-her a message to call him.[23] The nurse called Dennis later that same
-day at the funeral home where he worked and agreed to meet with him at
-the officers’ club at Roswell AAF that afternoon.[24]
-
-When the two met, the nurse appeared disturbed and ill.[25] Dennis
-asked her to explain what was going on when they met in the hospital
-the day before. The nurse explained that, in the course of her normal
-duties, she entered an examining room to get some supplies and
-encountered two doctors whom she did not recognize that “supposedly
-were doing a preliminary autopsy” on “three,” “very mangled,” “black,”
-“little bodies.”[26] The doctors requested the nurse remain in the
-room because they needed her assistance.[27] She allegedly explained
-that there was a terrible odor in the room that made both her and the
-doctors ill.[28] Due to this terrible odor and inadequate ventilation,
-the nurse allegedly told Dennis that the autopsies were moved to
-another facility on the base and then “everything” was taken to “Wright
-Field” (now Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio).[29]
-
-The nurse described the little bodies in detail and even provided a
-diagram.[30] She described “little bodies” three to four feet in length
-that had large, “flexible,” heads, and concave eyes and noses.[31]
-
-After this meeting Dennis claimed he never saw the nurse again, and he
-was told she had been shipped out the same afternoon (July 8, 1947)
-or the next day (July 9, 1947).[32] However, some time later Dennis
-received a letter from the nurse that indicated she was in London,
-England.[33] Dennis stated that he tried to respond to the nurse, but
-his letter was returned stamped “return to sender” and “deceased.”[34]
-After receiving this letter, he inquired at the base about the nurse
-and was told by “Captain Wilson” that she didn’t know where the nurse
-was, but there was a rumor that she and several other nurses had been
-killed in a plane crash while on a training mission.[35]
-
-Some years later, Dennis stated that he visited the unidentified
-military pediatrician he had seen at the hospital.[36] The pediatrician
-had since left the military and set up practice in Farmington, N.M.[37]
-Dennis said he and the pediatrician discussed the incident of years
-past but was stopped short when the pediatrician told him that he was
-consulted regarding this incident, but that “it was completely out of
-[his] field of medicine,” then ended the discussion.[38]
-
-Based on this account, UFO theorists have presented the following
-assertions:
-
- =a.= Dennis, the “missing” nurse, and the unidentified pediatrician
- inadvertently stumbled onto the highly classified autopsies of
- alien bodies at Roswell AAF hospital in July 1947.
-
- =b.= The two mysterious doctors at the hospital were sent
- to Roswell AAF from a higher headquarters to conduct the
- autopsies after which the bodies were transported to what is now
- Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.
-
- =c.= The bluish-purplish wreckage that looked like the bottom of
- a canoe in the rear of the ambulance, were “escape pods” from a
- flying saucer flown by the aliens that crashed in the Roswell area.
-
- =d.= Dennis was forcibly removed from the hospital and threatened
- with death by the redheaded officer because he had witnessed some
- of these activities.
-
- =e.= The nurse was kidnapped, possibly murdered, and all records
- that she ever existed were systematically destroyed by government
- agents, also because she witnessed these activities.
-
-As in other accounts examined in this report, the episodes described
-here became part of the Roswell Incident only because the witness
-claimed they occurred at a very specific time, July 7–9, 1947. These
-dates coincide with an actual event: the retrieval of experimental
-Project MOGUL research equipment that was erroneously reported as
-a flying disc (see Section One).[39] If the events described here
-occurred at any other time—years, months, weeks, or even days before or
-after July 7–9, 1947—they might be considered unusual to an uninformed
-person, but certainly not part of the Roswell Incident.
-
-Air Force research revealed that the witness made serious errors
-in his recollections of events. When his account was compared with
-official records of the actual events he is believed to have described,
-extensive inaccuracies were indicated including a likely error in the
-date by as much as 12 years.
-
-
-
-
- 2.1
-
- The “Missing” Nurse and the Pediatrician
-
-
-To illustrate the errors in this account and to identify actual events,
-the following section will examine the accounts of the missing nurse
-and the unidentified pediatrician. Both of these persons were allegedly
-present at the Roswell AAF hospital when the events described by the
-witness occurred.
-
-
-The “Missing” Nurse
-
-Dennis recalled that the nurse was quickly and suspiciously shipped out
-either the same day or the day after he met with her in the Roswell
-AAF Officers’ Club. If this allegation was true, it certainly seemed
-unusual—and verifiable. Therefore, the morning reports, the certified
-daily personnel accounting records required to be kept by all Army Air
-Forces units at that time, were obtained and reviewed. These reports
-did not indicate that a nurse or any other person was reassigned on
-the days alleged, July 8 or July 9, 1947.[40] The morning reports of
-the 427th Army Air Forces Base Unit (AAFBU) Squadron “M,” the unit
-that all the medical personnel at Roswell AAF were assigned in July
-1947, did not indicate a sudden or overseas transfer of a nurse or
-any other person. Records indicated that one nurse was reassigned on
-July 23, 1947, over two weeks after the purported events described by
-Dennis.[41] That nurse was transferred by normal personnel rotation
-procedures to Ft. Worth AAF (now Carswell AFB), Texas, where she
-remained on active duty until March 1949.[42] In fact, the Squadron “M”
-morning reports revealed the strength of the Army Nurse Corps (ANC) at
-Roswell AAF for July 1947 was only five nurses. Of these five nurses
-none were transferred overseas or killed in a plane crash—the “rumored”
-fate of the missing nurse.[43]
-
-This review of the hospital morning reports also indicated that the
-name of the missing nurse provided by the witness was inaccurate. The
-witness stated in several interviews that he believed the nurse’s name
-was Naomi Maria Selff.[44] A comprehensive search of morning reports
-and rosters from the Roswell AAF Station Hospital indicated that no
-person by this name, or a similar name, had ever served there. This
-finding was supported by a search of personnel records at the National
-Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in St. Louis, Mo., a part of the
-National Archives and Record Administration. NPRC is the depository for
-all U.S. military personnel records. The search at NPRC also did not
-find a record that a person named Naomi Maria Selff had ever served in
-any branch of the U.S. Armed Forces.
-
-These findings were consistent with previous efforts of several
-pro-UFO researchers who have also attempted to locate this nurse or
-members of her family. They, likewise, were also unable to confirm
-her existence.[45] While some UFO theorists continue to allege that
-this absence of records regarding a nurse by this name is part of a
-conspiracy to withhold information, the most likely reason for the lack
-of records is that this name is inaccurate.[*]
-
- [*] Interestingly, an article published in the Fall 1995 edition
- of _Omni_ magazine, a publication that in the past has published
- sensational “Roswell” claims, also independently accounted for all
- five of the nurses and expressed a decidedly skeptical opinion of
- the account of the “missing nurse.”
-
-Even though the name of the nurse is incorrect, it appears that a nurse
-assigned to the Roswell AAF Station Hospital in 1947 may have been the
-basis for the claims. Eileen Mae Fanton was the only nurse of the five
-assigned to Roswell AAF in July 1947, whose personal circumstances and
-physical attributes not only resembled those of the missing nurse, but
-appeared to be nearly an exact match.
-
-
-The “Missing Nurse?”
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 2. Eileen M. Fanton (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- 1st Lt. Eileen M. Fanton was assigned to the Roswell Army Air
- Field Station Hospital from December 26, 1946 until September 4,
- 1947.[46] Fanton, who is deceased, was retired from the U.S. Air
- Force at the rank of Captain on April 30, 1955, for a physical
- disability.[47]
-
- In this account, the missing nurse is described as single, “real
- cute, like a small Audrey Hepburn, with short black hair, dark
- eyes and olive skin.”[48] Lieutenant Fanton was single in 1947,
- 5′1″ tall, weighed 100 pounds, had black hair, dark eyes, and was
- of Italian descent.[49] Dennis also stated that the nurse was of
- the Catholic faith, and had been “strictly raised” according to
- Catholic beliefs.[50] Fanton’s personnel record listed her as Roman
- Catholic, a graduate of St. Catherine’s Academy in Springfield,
- Ky. and as having received her nursing certification from St. Mary
- Elizabeth’s Hospital in Louisville, Ky.[51]
-
- The witness also recalled that the “missing nurse” was a
- lieutenant, was a general nurse at the hospital, and had sent him
- correspondence at a later date which stated she was in London,
- England with a New York, N.Y. APO number (military overseas mailing
- address) as the return address.[52] Records revealed that Fanton
- was a First Lieutenant (promoted from Second Lieutenant to First
- Lieutenant in June 1947), and she was classified as a “nurse,
- general duty.”[53] Records also indicated that of the five nurses
- assigned to the Roswell AAF Station Hospital in July 1947, she
- was the only one that later served a tour of duty in England.
- Furthermore, she was assigned to the 7510th USAF Hospital, APO
- 240, New York, N.Y., where she served from June 1952 until April
- 1955.[54] The 7510th USAF Hospital was located approximately 45
- miles north of London at Wimpole Park, Cambridge, England.
-
- An additional similarity between Fanton and the “missing nurse”
- is that her personnel record indicated that she quickly departed
- Roswell AAF and it is probable that the hospital staff would not
- have provided information concerning her departure. Fanton’s
- unannounced departure from Roswell AAF, on September 4, 1947 was
- to be admitted to Brooke General Hospital, Ft. Sam Houston, Texas,
- for a medical condition.[55] This condition was first diagnosed
- in January 1946 and ultimately led to her medical retirement
- in 1955.[56] Therefore, if someone other than a family member
- contacted the Station Hospital at Roswell AAF and inquired about
- Fanton, as Dennis stated he did, the staff was simply protecting
- her privacy as a patient. The staff was not participating in a
- sinister “cover-up” of information as alleged by UFO theorists.
-
-
-The Pediatrician
-
-In at least two interviews, the witness stated that a pediatrician
-stationed at the hospital was involved in the events he described.[57]
-When asked by an interviewer how he knew the pediatrician was
-involved, Dennis was quoted as replying, “I know he was involved
-because I saw him there.”[58] Dennis is also quoted as saying that
-he and the pediatrician were “pretty good friends,” and after the
-pediatrician left the military he [the pediatrician] set up a practice
-in Farmington, N.M. “I used to go fishing all the time up north and
-I visited him several times up there and he was involved,” Dennis
-said. “I don’t remember his name, I think he is still practicing in
-Farmington.”[59]
-
-A review of personnel files and interviews with former members of the
-Roswell AAF/Walker AFB hospital staff, revealed that only one physician
-ever relocated to Farmington, N.M. following his military service. The
-former Capt. Frank B. Nordstrom served at Walker AFB from June 1951
-until June 1953.[60] Records also revealed that Nordstrom was indeed a
-pediatrician and while at Walker AFB, served as the Chief of Pediatric
-Services.[61] When Nordstrom, a resident of the small town of Aztec,
-N.M., was interviewed for this report, he stated that he did not recall
-ever meeting Dennis and could not recall any events that supported any
-of his claims (see signed sworn statement in Appendix B).[62]
-
-Farmington (population 8,000 in 1954) is located in the primarily
-rural Four Corners region of New Mexico approximately 300 miles
-northwest of Roswell. According to Nordstrom, Farmington did not have a
-pediatrician before his arrival in 1954. From 1954 until approximately
-1970, Nordstrom believes he was the only pediatrician in the area. His
-recollections were confirmed by a local Farmington pharmacist, Charles
-E. Clouthier.[63] Clouthier also served at the Walker AFB hospital,
-from 1955 to 1957, and following his military service returned to
-Farmington, his hometown, where he had lived since 1934. Clouthier has
-been employed by and co-owned a business, Farmington Drug, since 1957.
-He is familiar with most, if not all, of the doctors who practice
-in Farmington and the Four Corners region of New Mexico. Clouthier’s
-confirmation that Nordstrom was the first pediatrician to practice
-in the Farmington area, was based on both his frequent professional
-contacts with local physicians and his experiences as a longtime
-Farmington resident.[64]
-
-Although Nordstrom believed that he was the pediatrician described, he
-was at a loss to explain how Dennis gained information concerning his
-military and civilian employment history. In a signed sworn statement,
-Nordstrom stated that he did not recall ever meeting Dennis and had
-certainly never been visited by Dennis as he has claimed. One possible
-source of the information is that from approximately 1958 until
-approximately 1961 Dennis operated a drugstore in Aztec, N.M., a small
-town near Farmington where Nordstrom resides (interestingly Aztec is
-the location of the original “crashed flying saucer” story, see below).
-However, Nordstrom also did not recall any contact with Dennis in his
-capacity as a drugstore operator.
-
-
- Behind the Roswell Incident?
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 3. Story by J.P. Cahn, that appeared in the
- August 1956, _True_ magazine.]
-
- The “Roswell Incident” story is hardly original. In 1948, a work
- of fiction reportedly appeared in the _Aztec_ (N.M.) _Independent
- Review_ describing the crash of a flying saucer with “little
- men” near Aztec, N.M. In 1950, Frank Scully, a columnist for
- the theatrical publication _Variety_, published a book, _Behind
- the Flying Saucers_, which proclaimed the story to be true.[65]
- Based on the Aztec story, _Behind the Flying Saucers_ bears many
- similarities to the Roswell Incident, most notably, descriptions
- of covert “flying saucer” and “little men” recoveries interspersed
- with doses of unsubstantiated accusations directed at the U.S. Air
- Force.[66]
-
- In his book, Scully claimed he had information from two scientists,
- Silas M. Newton and a mysterious “Dr. Gee,” who he claimed
- investigated the crash for the government.[67] In reality,
- Newton and Gee were con-men who convinced Scully of the story’s
- authenticity.[68]
-
- Intrigued by the sensational claims made in _Behind the Flying
- Saucers_, a reporter for the _San Francisco Chronicle_, J. P. Cahn,
- decided to look into the matter. What resulted from Cahn’s research
- were articles in the September 1952 and August 1956 edition of
- _True_ magazine which determined that the story was as “phony as a
- headwaiters bow and smile.”[69]
-
- Cahn, with the assistance of a magician, devised a plan to “sting”
- the two con-men.[70] To execute the sting, he used sleight of
- hand switching an “indestructible” metal disk, claimed to be
- from a flying saucer, with a slug of his own manufacture. After
- the switch, Cahn submitted the disk to a laboratory for analysis
- revealing that they were of earthly origin, in particular, a grade
- of aluminum used to manufacture pots and pans![71]
-
- Even with the exposure of this obvious fraud, the Aztec story is
- still revered by UFO theorists. Elements of this story occasionally
- reemerge and are thought to be the catalyst for other crashed
- flying saucer stories, including the Roswell Incident.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 4. September 1952 _True_ magazine story that
- exposed the Aztec, N.M. hoax.]
-
-
-Descriptions of Other Air Force Members
-
-Since official records proved that none of the nurses at Roswell AAF
-in July 1947 were missing, and the nurse and pediatrician described
-in this account had been identified, major discrepancies between
-Dennis’ recollections and official records were apparent. In an effort
-to provide for the fullest possible accounting of these claims, even
-though key aspects had already been proven false, Air Force researchers
-sought additional information to determine if there was validity to
-_any_ portion of the account. Since the witness has never provided
-documentation to support his claims, the only source of additional
-information was the numerous interviews he had previously provided to
-private researchers and the media. His many statements, which have
-appeared in newspapers, videos, magazines, movies, books, lectures,
-journals and television programs, were reviewed for information that
-might further explain his testimony.
-
-Examination of this large body of publicly available information
-immediately provided clues that the witness may have recalled
-incidents from a period other than July 1947. The first clue was that
-he repeatedly, in all of the interviews, referred to the injured
-military person he allegedly transported to the Roswell AAF hospital
-as an airman. The rank of airman was not in existence in 1947. It
-was implemented on April 1, 1952.[72] Prior to that date an airman
-in the Air Force was referred to by the U.S. Army equivalent, a
-private. Another possible indication that he recalled events from a
-different time was the description of an alleged “black sergeant” that
-accompanied the redheaded officer at the hospital. The pairing of a
-white officer with a black NCO seemed unlikely since in 1947 the U.S.
-Army Air Forces was racially segregated, as were all branches of the
-armed forces. The U.S. Air Force did not begin racial integration until
-the May 11, 1949 issuance of Air Force Letter 35-3 that formally ended
-segregation.[73] Though it was not impossible in 1947 for a black NCO
-to accompany and seem to be working with a white officer, it would be
-unlikely. These two discrepancies did not provide a firm time frame of
-actual events, if any occurred at all.
-
-To approximate a time frame for actual events, the specific details
-of the information provided were examined. This examination was to
-determine if any military members were identified by name or by a
-combination of any other distinguishing characteristics such as rank,
-position, age, or physical attributes. If the testimony identified
-a military member as having been present for an event, then their
-personnel record could be used to affix an approximate date. Affixing
-a date of an event by referencing personnel records was possible since
-each military member’s personnel file contains a physical description
-and chronological listing of duty stations, units of assignment, and
-work assignments for his/her entire military career.
-
-This detailed examination revealed several likely references to
-specific individuals, which through their personnel files, were
-documented as having been assigned to the hospital at Roswell AAF or
-Walker AFB (Roswell AAF was renamed Walker AFB in January 1948).
-
-=The “Big Redheaded Colonel.”= An indication that Dennis might have
-mistaken the date of actual events was that he was quoted in at least
-one book as having said that the officer who threatened him in the
-hospital was a big redheaded colonel.[74] Research revealed that only
-one tall colonel with red hair was known to have been assigned to the
-Walker AFB hospital. Colonel Lee F. Ferrell was the hospital commander
-from October 1954 until June 1960.[75] Ferrell was 6′1″ tall and had
-red hair.[76]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 5. Col. Lee F. Ferrell (_left_), was commander
- of the Walker AFB hospital from 1954–1960. In this photo Ferrell
- escorts U.S. Senator Dennis Chavez (N.M.) on a tour of the new
- Walker AFB hospital in June 1960, which was named in honor of the
- senator. (_U.S. Air Force photo_) ]
-
-“=Captain ‘Slatts’ Wilson.=” In at least two interviews Dennis
-repeatedly made reference to a nurse named “Captain Wilson.”[77] He
-recalled that “Captain Wilson”, who he believed was the head nurse, was
-another nurse stationed at the Roswell AAF hospital in July 1947.[78]
-Dennis claims he spoke to “Captain Wilson” several times in reference
-to the alleged missing nurse.[79]
-
-He claims that on the day after he met with the missing nurse at the
-Roswell AAF Officers’ Club, he attempted to contact her by telephone
-at the hospital but was told that she wasn’t on duty.[80] Instead, he
-spoke with “Captain Wilson.” “I called the station I knew she [the
-missing nurse] always worked at,” Dennis said, “She was a general
-nurse.... I was informed that she wasn’t working that day. [Dennis
-then telephoned] An old girl by the name of Wilson, Captain Wilson,
-and I asked her ‘what happened’? She said, ‘Glenn, I don’t know what
-happened, she’s not on duty.’ She said she’d try to get word to her
-[the missing nurse] that you [Dennis] want to talk to her.”[81] Later
-in the same interview Dennis further described Wilson. “We called
-her ‘Slatts’ Wilson who was a big tall nurse about six foot two or
-three—big tall skinny gal—and we called her ‘Slatts’—everybody called
-her ‘Slatts.’ She’s the one who told me she heard there was a plane
-crash and the nurses went down on a training mission.”[82]
-
-The testimony appeared to clearly identify by name, rank, position,
-physical attributes and by a distinctive nickname, “Slatts,” another
-nurse present at the hospital in July 1947. But a review of the morning
-reports of the Roswell AAF hospital for July 1947 did not contain the
-name of a nurse, or anyone else, named Wilson.[83] The only female
-captain assigned to the Roswell AAF Hospital in July 1947 was the
-Chief Nurse Capt. Joyce Goddard.[84] Goddard, who was 5′6″ tall, was
-transferred from Roswell AAF to Korea on August 21, 1947.[85]
-
-Therefore, according to Dennis’ recollection of events, this review of
-the morning reports indicated that there were two missing nurses, not
-one—“Lieutenant Naomi Selff” and “Captain ‘Slatts’ Wilson.” Further
-scrutiny of personnel records of individuals assigned to the Roswell
-AAF/Walker AFB hospital indicated that Dennis’ recollections of events
-were apparently inaccurate.
-
-Examination of the August 1947 morning reports did not list a nurse
-named Wilson, but they _did_ list a nurse named Slattery.[86] Captain
-Lucille C. Slattery, who retired as a Lieutenant Colonel and is now
-deceased, was reassigned from Ft. George Wright, Wash. to Roswell AAF
-on August 7, 1947.[87]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 6. Lt. Col. Lucille C. Slattery, the only Air
- Force nurse ever known as “Slatts,” served as a captain at the
- Roswell AAF/Walker AFB hospital from August 1947 to September 1950.
- Records indicate that Slattery did not arrive at Roswell AAF until
- one month _after_ the “Roswell Incident,” in direct contradiction
- to statements made by the sole witness to this account. (_U.S. Air
- Force photo_)]
-
-Slattery replaced Goddard as the Chief Nurse and was the only female
-captain assigned to the Roswell AAF hospital. Interviews of persons
-with longtime professional and personal associations with Slattery,
-revealed that she was known by the unusual nickname of Slatts.[88]
-Additionally, former associates of Slattery interviewed for this
-report, recalled that she was the only Air Force nurse that had ever
-been known as Slatts.[89] Persons interviewed were Air Force nurses
-who retired in the 1960s, each with more than 20 years of service,
-including retired Air Force Col. Ethel Kovatch-Scott, who served as
-Chief Nurse of the Air Force from 1963 to 1965.
-
-Upon review of Slattery’s personnel file it was learned that she was
-only 5′3″ tall and therefore was most likely not the 6′2″ or 6′3″ “tall
-skinny” nurse described.[90] This discrepancy in physical description
-and the fact that she did not arrive at Roswell AAF until nearly one
-month _after_ Dennis claims he spoke to her, led to the conclusion that
-perhaps he confused Slattery with some other tall thin nurse, possibly
-named Wilson, who was stationed at the Roswell AAF or Walker AFB
-hospital at some other time.
-
-Consequently, a comprehensive review of the morning reports and
-rosters of the Roswell AAF/Walker AFB hospital revealed that only one
-nurse named Wilson had ever served there and she did not arrive until
-February 1956.[91][*] Capt. Idabelle Miller, who became Maj. Idabelle
-Wilson in 1958 due to marriage and a promotion, was assigned to the
-Walker AFB hospital from February 1956 until May 1960.[92]
-
-[*] Records were also searched for names similar to Wilson. Three
-nurses stationed at Roswell AAF/Walker AFB were identified: Martha
-Wasem, Carol Williams, and Chalma Walker. None of these nurses physical
-descriptions or personal/professional circumstances were similar to the
-descriptions of “Captain Wilson” described by the witness.
-
-Upon review of Maj. Wilson’s personnel file, it was learned that she
-was 5′9″ tall and thin. Also, she served as the Head Nurse of the
-surgical ward at the Walker AFB hospital.[93] Therefore, Wilson’s
-physical attributes, tall and thin, and position as Head Nurse matched
-Dennis’ recollections of “Captain Wilson.” When contacted by Air Force
-researchers, Wilson stated she had no recollection of Dennis, of ever
-having conversations with him, any of the events he described, or of
-a nurse that was missing.[94] She also made it abundantly clear that
-as an Air Force officer and medical professional she would not spread
-a rumor of a plane crash, as Dennis alleged “Captain Wilson” did in
-conversations with him.[95]
-
-
-
-
- Results of Missing Nurse and Pediatrician Research
-
-Examination of the missing nurse and the pediatrician stories, and
-other facts established by research, provide a foundation for further
-analysis to determine what actual event(s), if any, were responsible
-for these claims. Based on information developed, it appears this
-witness may be mistaken in some of his statements, especially regarding
-the time frame of these events.
-
-The following facts have been established:
-
- =a.= The only physician who ever relocated to Farmington, N.M.,
- following his military service at Roswell AAF/Walker AFB was the
- former Chief of Pediatric Services at the Walker AFB hospital,
- the former Capt. Frank B. Nordstrom. Further, he did not arrive
- at Walker AFB until June 1951, four years _after_ the purported
- Roswell Incident, has no recollection of Dennis, the statements
- Dennis attributes to him, or of any actual events that explain his
- account.
-
- =b.= The only nurse ever assigned to the Roswell AAF hospital
- (subsequently renamed Walker AFB) named Wilson, was Idabelle
- Wilson. She served at the Walker AFB hospital from 1956 until 1960
- and had no recollection of ever meeting or speaking with Dennis or
- any of the activities he described.
-
- =c.= Captain Lucille C. Slattery, the only Air Force nurse ever
- known by the distinctive nickname “Slatts,” _was_ stationed at the
- Roswell AAF hospital. However, she did not arrive until August 7,
- 1947. This was one month _after_ the Roswell Incident, making it
- improbable that Dennis spoke with her in early July 1947.
-
- =d.= There is no record that a nurse named Naomi Maria Selff, was
- ever assigned to Roswell AAF, Walker AFB, or was ever a member of
- the U.S. military.
-
- =e.= All nurses assigned to the Roswell AAF hospital in July 1947,
- have been accounted for, thereby eliminating any possibility that
- there was ever a missing nurse.
-
-Since actual Air Force members who served at Roswell AAF/Walker AFB
-hospital were described in this account, the next step was to determine
-if actual events that occurred at the hospital were possibly the source
-of this story. As stated earlier in this report, a thorough examination
-of both classified and unclassified records from 1947 revealed no Army
-Air Forces or U.S. Air Force activities that explained the alleged
-events. Therefore records were reviewed from other time periods, based
-on personnel records of individuals believed to have been identified.
-These persons and the periods when they were assigned to Roswell
-AAF/Walker AFB are listed in Table 2.1.
-
-
- Table 2.1
- Persons Described and Periods of Service
- at Roswell AAF/Walker AFB
-
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Witness Actual Individual Period of Service at
- Description Described Roswell AAF/Walker AFB
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- the “missing” nurse 1st Lt. Eileen M. Fanton Dec. 1946-Sept. 1947
-
- “Capt. ‘Slatts’ Wilson” Capt. Lucille C. Slattery Aug. 1947-Sept. 1950
- (composite of two and
- individuals) Maj. Idabelle M. Wilson Feb. 1956-May 1960
-
- “the pediatrician” Capt. Frank B. Nordstrom June 1951-June 1953
-
- “big redheaded colonel” Col. Lee F. Ferrell Oct. 1954-June 1960
-
-
-The Research Profile
-
-With the establishment of a possible time frame, research efforts
-paralleled the previous examination in Section One of this report that
-determined high altitude balloons with anthropomorphic dummy payloads
-were responsible for the reports of aliens at the two rural New Mexico
-“crashed saucer” locations. A further review of Air Force activities
-was then made to determine if any were significantly similar to the
-information provided. Based on the time period established by personnel
-records and statements contained in the witness’ own account, the
-following profile of possible events was established:
-
-An event involving the Walker AFB hospital that took place between 1947
-and 1960;
-
- =a.= that may have resulted in “very mangled,” “black,” “little
- bodies,” that had a strong “odor” being placed in “body bags”;
-
- =b.= that may have resulted in two persons not normally assigned to
- the hospital, believed to be doctors, that were “supposedly doing
- preliminary autopsies” on the “little bodies”;
-
- =c.= that may have involved a body with a head that was much larger
- than normal which was transported to Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio;
-
- =d.= that may have involved a redheaded captain or a big redheaded
- colonel;
-
- =e.= that may have resulted in an ambulance parked in the rear
- of the hospital containing wreckage with inscriptions, that were
- bluish-purplish which looked kind of like the bottom of a canoe;
- and,
-
- =f.= that may have required a heightened state of security.
-
-
-
-
- 2.2
-
- Aircraft Accidents
-
-
-The examination of events that involved the Walker AFB hospital that
-may explain reports of bodies was begun by reviewing the most prominent
-possible source, which were aircraft accident(s).[*] A review of
-aircraft accidents from 1947 to 1960 revealed eight fatal accidents
-that involved Walker AFB.
-
- [*] Other possible explanations such as automobile accidents,
- house fires, etc., were also examined. However, none of these were
- determined to be responsible for this account of bodies.
-
-
- Table 2.2
- Fatal Aircraft Accidents by Year in the Vicinity of Walker AFB
- 1947–1960
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Year Aircraft Location of Accident Number of
- Type (distance from Walker AFB, N.M.) Fatalities
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- =1947=
- None
-
- =1948=
- 8/12/48 B-29 4 miles South 13
-
- =1949=
- 5/16/49 C-47 6 miles Northeast 6
- 12/15/49 B-29 2 miles Northwest 7
-
- =1950=
- 6/1/50 KB-29 12 miles East/Southeast 3
-
- =1951=
- None
-
- =1952=
- None
-
- =1953=
- None
-
- =1954=
- None
-
- =1955=
- 6/16/55 T-33 On runway 2
- 10/3/55 B-47 34 miles West 2
-
- =1956=
- 6/26/56 KC-97 8.8 miles South 11
-
- =1957=
- None
-
- =1958=
- None
-
- =1959=
- None
-
- =1960=
- 2/3/60 KC-135 On runway and ramp 13
-
-The following three basic criteria were used to narrow research efforts
-to specific accidents for more detailed examinations: were the victims
-burned, resulting in possible descriptions of “black” “little bodies”?;
-were the victims transported to the Walker AFB hospital?; and, were
-the victims autopsied? To facilitate this examination, researchers
-reviewed official accident reports, organizational and base histories,
-individual personnel records of victims, and contemporary newspaper
-accounts of the accidents. Interviews of persons who participated in
-the aftermath of these accidents were also conducted. As a result, only
-one accident met the three criteria, the June 1956 KC-97 accident.
-
-
- Table 2.3
- Analysis of Air Force Aircraft Accidents
- by Year in the Vicinity of Walker AFB
- 1947–1960
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Date of Aircraft Fatalities
- Accident Type
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Burned? Taken to WAFB Autopsied?
- Hospital?
-
- 8/12/48 B-29 Yes[96] No[97] No[98]
-
- 5/16/49 C-47 Yes[99] No[100] No[101]
-
- 12/15/49 B-29 No[102] Yes[103] Yes[104]
-
- 6/1/50 KB-29 No[105] No[106] No[107]
-
- 6/16/55 T-33 Yes[108] No[109] Yes[110]
-
- 10/3/55 B-47 Yes[111] No[112] No[113]
-
- 6/26/56 KC-97 Yes[114] Yes[115] Yes[116]
-
- 2/3/60 KC-135 Yes[117] No[118] No[119]
-
-Upon detailed review of records of the 1956 accident and interviews
-with persons who participated in the recovery and identification of the
-victims, extensive similarities to the description the witness provided
-were apparent.
-
-
-Fatal KC-97 Aircraft Mishap
-
-In 1956, Walker AFB, N.M. was the home of Strategic Air Command’s 6th
-and 509th Bombardment Wings.[120] Additionally, Walker was home of the
-509th Aerial Refueling Squadron (509th ARS) equipped with the KC-97G
-aircraft.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 7. A KC-97 similar to this of the 509th Aerial
- Refueling Squadron crashed 8.8 miles south of Walker AFB on June
- 26, 1956 with the loss of 11 lives. Descriptions of the aftermath
- of this tragedy are believed to be the basis for some of the
- reports of “bodies” at the Walker AFB hospital. (_U.S. Air Force
- photo_)]
-
-The accident occurred on June 26, 1956, 8.8 statute miles south of
-Walker AFB.[121] A KC-97G aircraft with 11 crewmen on board, while on
-a refueling training mission, experienced a propeller failure four
-and one half minutes after takeoff.[122] As a result of the propeller
-failure, a propeller blade was believed to have punctured the deck fuel
-tank of the fully loaded tanker causing an intense cabin fire.[123] The
-aircraft was quickly engulfed in flames, spun out of control, and was
-completely destroyed. All 11 Air Force members were killed instantly by
-the fire and impact explosion.[124] Due to the isolated rural impact
-location on property owned by the state of New Mexico, there was
-minimal collateral damage and no fatalities or injuries to persons on
-the ground.[125]
-
-The remains of the crewmen were recovered from the crash site and
-transported by members of the 4036th USAF Hospital (numerical
-designation of the hospital at Walker AFB) to the hospital facility at
-Walker AFB for identification.[126]
-
-On the day following the crash, an identification specialist from
-Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio arrived at the hospital to assist in
-identifying the remains.[127] Part way through the identification
-process, conducted by both the identification specialist and Air
-Force members assigned to the Walker AFB hospital, the identification
-activities were moved to a refrigerated compartment at the Walker AFB
-commissary.[128] This was due to an overpowering odor emitted by the
-burned and fuel-soaked bodies and the lack of proper storage facilities
-at the small base hospital.[129] Also on the day following the crash,
-June 27, 1956, autopsies of three of the victims were accomplished by
-a local Roswell pathologist.[130] These examinations were performed
-at a local funeral home.[131] Upon completion of the identification
-procedures and the postmortem examinations, the remains were shipped to
-the next of kin for burial.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 8. Main entrance of the 4036th USAF hospital
- at Walker AFB, 1956. Initial identification procedures of the
- 11 aircrewmen killed in the June 26, 1956 KC-97 accident were
- conducted here before being transferred to another facility on the
- base with refrigeration capability. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-
-Comparison of the Account to the KC-97 Mishap
-
-This series of actual events contains extensive similarities to the
-account provided by Dennis. The numerous and extensive similarities
-indicate that some elements of this actual event were most probably
-included in Dennis’ account. This aircraft accident provides an
-explanation for the following elements of the research profile—the very
-mangled, black, little bodies in body bags, the odor, the two strange
-doctors, and the report of a redheaded colonel.
-
-
- Aircraft Crashes and UFOs
-
- Since the first flying saucer story in June 1947, persons have
- attempted to exploit actual military aircraft accidents to support
- UFO theories and propagate the flying saucer phenomenon.
-
- One of the first exploitation attempts involved a fatal August 1,
- 1947 Army Air Forces B-25 accident near Kelso, Wash. Descriptions
- of this accident, which UFO theorists contend was caused because
- the aircraft carried parts of a flying saucer, were included in
- a poorly executed hoax. Nonetheless, it received a considerable
- amount of attention.
-
- Another incidence was photographs of an “alien,” supposedly from
- a 1948 crash of a flying saucer in Mexico. However, when the
- photographs were examined by Air Force officials, they noticed
- a pair of government issue, aviator style, sunglasses lying
- underneath the “alien” body.
-
- Perhaps the most famous attempt to exploit an actual aircraft
- accident involved the fatal January 1948 crash of a Kentucky Air
- National Guard F-51 fighter near Franklin, Ky. Theorists contend
- the fighter was shot down by a UFO. However, it was determined
- that this aircraft most probably crashed while observing a newly
- invented high altitude research balloon thought to be a UFO. The
- large balloon, which matched eyewitnesses’ descriptions at the
- time, was released the previous day, and its ground track placed
- it precisely in the area where the unidentified object was sighted
- the next day. Regardless, shameless attempts to exploit this
- event continued as recently as 1995, when the tabloid TV program,
- _Sightings_, aired and published (_Sightings_, Simon & Schuster,
- 1996, 170–176) a distorted interpretation of this tragedy.
-
-
-=The “Black” “Little Bodies.”= Review of the autopsy protocols of
-the victims of this accident revealed extensive similarities to the
-descriptions of the bodies allegedly described by the missing nurse.
-Dennis related in various interviews that the missing nurse described,
-“... three; very mangled; black; little bodies in body bags.”[132]
-Records of this mishap confirmed that the victims suffered “injuries,
-extreme, multiple.”[133] According to persons who assisted in the
-identification of the remains from this crash, and in compliance with
-Air Force directives in effect at that time, human remains pouches,
-commonly called body bags, were used to recover and transport victims’
-bodies.[134]
-
-Statements made by Dennis described bodies that were “three-and-a-half
-to four feet tall,” and “black” in color.[135] The autopsy protocols
-of two victims described extensive third degree burns and loss of the
-lower extremities.[136] Dennis also described a head of one of the
-bodies that was not rigid but “flexible” and tissues of a body in
-“strings” that looked as if they were “pulled” by predatory animals
-after the crash.[137] An autopsy protocol of a victim described
-“multiple fractures of all bones of the skull” and “partially cooked
-strands of bowel ... over the abdomen and in the chest.”[138]
-Additional similarities between the autopsy protocols and Dennis’
-statements were a detached hand and descriptions of the fingers and
-arms of the crash victims.[139]
-
-The autopsy protocol of one victim also described remains with a “face
-completely missing.”[140] This description corresponds with Dennis’
-recollections of a body with eyes and nose that were concave. Also,
-the drawing of the head of one of the “little bodies” Dennis claims
-is representative of a drawing given to him by the missing nurse is
-a reasonably accurate representation of a human body with its face
-completely missing.[141]
-
-Another similarity to Dennis’ account is that of the 11 victims of this
-accident, only three were autopsied—the same number of bodies that
-were allegedly autopsied in the missing nurse’s account.[142] Finally,
-records revealed that due to limited facilities at the Walker AFB
-hospital, the autopsies were performed at the Ballard Funeral Home in
-Roswell.[143] This is the same funeral home where Dennis claimed to be
-employed in 1947 until 1962.[144][*]
-
- [*] It is unclear when Dennis worked at this funeral home since
- city and phone directories listed him as co-owning a different
- funeral home in Roswell, as vice-president of another funeral home
- in Roswell, and as having been employed as a drug store supervisor
- and oil field worker during the periods when he claims he worked at
- the Ballard Funeral Home.
-
-=The Odor.= Transportation of remains to a small base hospital was
-unusual since the hospital did not have the necessary facilities—a
-preparation room, refrigeration equipment or a morgue, to accommodate
-multiple deceased persons. Records of other crashes involving Walker
-AFB showed that the remains of crash victims were transported either to
-another facility on Walker AFB or directly to a local funeral home.[145]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 9. Three of the 11 Air Force members killed
- in the June 26, 1956 KC-97 accident were autopsied at the Ballard
- Funeral Home in Roswell. The actual descriptions of the remains
- (only three were autopsied), closely corresponds with Dennis’
- descriptions regarding the “little bodies.” Additionally, this is
- the same funeral home where Dennis claimed to be employed from 1947
- until 1962.]
-
-In fact, the Air Force manual that prescribed the policies, standards
-and procedures relating to the care and disposition of deceased Air
-Force personnel in effect in 1956, Air Force Manual 143-1, _Mortuary
-Affairs_, did not direct that remains be brought to a hospital. It
-encouraged the local commander to “improvise facilities” and make
-use of “garages, warehouses, large tents, or other facilities for
-processing groups of remains.”[146] Nonetheless, records of the June
-1956 crash and interviews with the persons who processed the remains
-indicated that the victims were brought from the crash site to the
-Walker AFB hospital.[147] During the identification procedures, the
-odor became too strong and the bodies and the identification activities
-were moved to a refrigerated compartment at the base commissary.[148]
-
-Interviewed for this report were the registrar of the hospital, 1st
-Lt. Jack Whenry (now a retired Major) and a medical administration
-specialist assigned to the registrar, SSgt. John Walter (now a
-retired Master Sergeant), both of whom assisted in the processing and
-identification of the deceased aircrewmen. Whenry and Walter both
-recalled the strong odor, that some persons became ill during the
-procedures (as did the alleged missing nurse), and the unusual transfer
-of the remains to the Walker AFB commissary (the nurse also allegedly
-described the transfer of remains to another building on the base).
-However, neither recalled that a nurse was missing or any of the other
-activities as described by Dennis.[149]
-
-=The “Big Redheaded Colonel.”= The big redheaded colonel is a likely
-reference to the hospital commander, Col. Lee F. Ferrell, who was
-6′1″ tall and had red hair. Ferrell served at the Walker AFB hospital
-from 1954 until 1960.[150] It would not be unusual for the hospital
-commander to be present at the hospital following a major aircraft
-accident.
-
-=The Two Mysterious “Doctors.”= The two doctors not assigned to the
-Walker AFB hospital who were allegedly observed at the hospital
-performing preliminary autopsies have been identified as an Air Force
-civilian identification specialist and a local Roswell pathologist.
-
-=_Identification Specialist._= In an aircraft mishap involving multiple
-fatalities, identification of victims can go beyond the capabilities
-of a small Air Force hospital such as the one at Walker AFB. Beginning
-in July 1951, the Air Force Memorial Affairs Branch, now called Air
-Force Mortuary Services, employed full-time civilian morticians and
-funeral directors, known as identification specialists, to assist Air
-Force installations in the identification of deceased persons.[151]
-When requested by the local commander, the identification specialists,
-on a 24-hour standby basis, responded from Wright-Patterson AFB to the
-location of an incident.[152] Records confirm that Walker AFB only
-requested an identification specialist on two occasions, in October
-1955 and to identity the victims of the June 1956 crash.[153] For this
-accident the identification specialist arrived at Walker AFB on June
-27, 1956 and made positive identifications of the 11 crewmen on June
-28, 1956.[154]
-
-When contacted for this report, the retired identification specialist
-who responded to this accident, Mr. George Schwaderer, did not have
-any recollections of Dennis, the nurse, the pediatrician, or any of
-the other unusual activities as alleged.[155] Schwaderer did recall
-that on identifications of group remains such as this, it was typical
-to wear standard hospital surgical gowns and masks and that he was
-often mistaken for a pathologist.[156]
-
-Due to restrictions on the release of information concerning the
-identification process, uninformed individuals who may, by chance, have
-witnessed some portions of the identification, were often the source
-of a considerable amount of speculation. The identification procedures
-employed by the identification specialists were not classified, but
-AFM-143-1, _Mortuary Affairs_, directed that “no information will be
-divulged concerning identification or shipment of any remains until a
-final determination of identity has been resolved for all remains.”[157]
-
-For this accident, identification took approximately two days and any
-releases of information were restricted to individuals with an official
-requirement. These restrictions extended, not only to the general
-public, but also to Air Force members.
-
-A possible reference to the identification specialist is found in one
-of Dennis’ recitations of the account. Dennis, a mortician who might
-possess limited knowledge of Air Force mortuary procedures, stated that
-he was told the “doctors” might be pathologists from “Walter Reed Army
-Hospital.”[158] Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington D.C. is
-a likely location that an unknown pathologist performing an autopsy on
-military personnel might have been based. Co-located at Walter Reed is
-the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) and beginning in 1955,
-AFIP sent pathologists into the field to examine aircraft accidents. A
-review of records at AFIP and interviews with persons involved with the
-identification procedures at Walker AFB do not indicate AFIP sent any
-personnel to assist in this accident.[159]
-
-=_Pathology Consultant._= In June 1956, the Walker AFB hospital did
-not have a pathologist on staff.[160] All autopsies and examinations
-of pathological specimens were conducted by a civilian consultant from
-Roswell.[161] The autopsy protocols of the deceased crewmen from the
-June 1956 crash indicated that Dr. Alfred S. Blauw of Roswell performed
-the three autopsies.[162] Obviously, neither the pathologist nor the
-identification specialist were normally assigned to the Walker AFB
-hospital and would not be expected to be present at the hospital,
-especially to an observer with limited knowledge of these activities.
-
-
- Continuing Research
-
-The focus of research was now shifted to other activities that might
-explain the remaining portions of the profile. The unexplained portions
-were:
-
- =a.= the presence of a redheaded captain;
-
- =b.= the wreckage in the rear of the ambulance outside the Walker
- AFB hospital;
-
- =c.= the heightened state of security at the Walker AFB hospital;
- and,
-
- =d.= the shipment of a body with a large head to Wright-Patterson
- AFB.
-
-Based on previous research, this effort began by examining records of
-the other Air Force aerial vehicle known to have operated extensively
-in the Roswell area since the late 1940s—high altitude research
-balloons.
-
-
-
-
- 2.3
-
- High Altitude Research Projects
-
-
-By 1960, hundreds of high altitude research balloons, some that
-carried anthropomorphic dummies, descended and were recovered in areas
-surrounding Walker AFB and Roswell. But based on the descriptions of
-the bodies and the involvement of a hospital and medical personnel,
-it did not seem likely that high altitude research balloons with
-scientific instruments or anthropomorphic dummies could possibly
-account for this testimony. Therefore, the focal point of the research
-shifted to manned high altitude balloon flights conducted by the Air
-Force during the mid to late 1950s and early 1960s.
-
-
-Manned Balloon Flights
-
-Two manned balloon projects, MAN HIGH and EXCELSIOR, were conducted
-within the time period targeted for research: MAN HIGH from 1957 to
-1958[163] and the manned portion of EXCELSIOR in 1959 and 1960. The
-only other manned high altitude balloon project in Air Force history,
-STARGAZER, did not fly until 1962.
-
-It was discovered that only six manned flights were made for MAN
-HIGH and EXCELSIOR. These flights were determined unlikely as the
-source of the testimony since there were no injuries or deaths, all
-six flights had been the subject of intense media coverage, and none
-were flown in the vicinity of Roswell. Despite the apparent dead end
-these flights presented to explain this account, records were obtained
-and persons involved in MAN HIGH and EXCELSIOR were contacted and
-interviewed. These records and interviews confirmed that there were,
-in fact, only six USAF manned high altitude balloon flights, none
-with characteristics similar to the testimony. However, detailed
-examinations of the records revealed that, in addition to the six
-high altitude balloon flights, there were also numerous low altitude
-balloon flights made to train and qualify the high altitude balloon
-pilots.[164] Records of the training flights indicated that some
-of these were conducted at Holloman AFB, N.M., and several mishaps
-occurred resulting in injuries to the pilots.[165]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 10. Maj. David G. Simons (MC) (_left_), balloon
- designer Otto C. Winzen (_center_) and Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger,
- Jr., examine a scale model of a low altitude balloon gondola used
- to train pilots for high altitude missions. (_photo courtesy of
- Mike Smith, Raven Industries_)]
-
-Further research revealed that one accident had taken place just
-northwest of Roswell.[166] The accident occurred on May 21, 1959, 10
-miles northwest of Walker AFB, on a pilot training mission for the
-upcoming Project EXCELSIOR and STARGAZER flights scheduled to begin
-that fall. Analysis of the accident revealed actual events that closely
-resembled the remaining portions of the established profile.
-
-
- U.S. Air Force Manned High Altitude Balloon Projects
-
- In addition to unmanned high altitude balloon research flights,
- from 1957 to 1962 the U.S. Air Force conducted a series of seven
- manned high altitude flights. These forward-looking projects
- investigated the upper reaches of the earth’s atmosphere and
- laid the foundation for manned spaceflight. Most flights were
- conducted before rocket booster technology was available to propel
- a spacecraft into earth’s orbit. In this interim period, to “bridge
- the gap” while awaiting developments in rocket technology, high
- altitude balloons were the only vehicles capable of reaching the
- altitudes required. All three of the USAF manned high altitude
- balloon projects, MAN HIGH, EXCELSIOR, and STARGAZER utilized
- Holloman AFB balloons to transport men to the very edge of space,
- above approximately 99 per cent of the earth’s atmosphere, a region
- known as “near space.”
-
- =Project MAN HIGH.= In 1955, a combined effort by the U.S. Air
- Force Aeromedical Field Laboratory, Winzen Research International,
- and the Holloman Balloon Branch resulted in the first Air Force
- manned balloon program. Project MAN HIGH, officially known as the
- Biodynamics of Space Flight, directed by Lt. Col. David Simons
- (MC), was the first of the three widely publicized manned high
- altitude balloon programs. The objective of Project MAN HIGH was
- to measure the physiological and psychological capabilities of a
- human in a space equivalent environment. Many developments of this
- successful project were later incorporated into the first phase
- of the U.S. Air Force Man in Space Program nicknamed MAN IN SPACE
- SOONEST (MISS). Technology developed for MISS was transferred to
- NASA in 1959 and became part of Project MERCURY, the initial series
- of U.S. space missions.[167]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 11. (_Left_) Test pilot Capt. Joseph W.
- Kittinger, Jr. just before launch of MAN HIGH I at New Brighton,
- Minn. on June 2, 1957. Kittinger flew in all three USAF high
- altitude balloon projects and has accumulated more high altitude
- balloon flying hours than anyone else in the world. (_U.S. Air
- Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 12. (_Center_) Lt. Col. David G. Simons (MC),
- a physician and pilot of the MAN HIGH II high altitude balloon
- mission, is shown here boarding the recovery helicopter near
- Frederick, S.D. following the successful flight on August 19,
- 1957. This flight lasted 33 hours and 10 minutes attaining a peak
- altitude of 101,500 feet. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 13. (_Right_) Holloman AFB Balloon Branch
- Meteorologist and Engineer, Bernard D. Gildenberg, instructs high
- altitude balloon pilot 1st Lt. Clifton McClure, pilot of MAN HIGH
- III, in the operation of a low altitude training balloon on May 12,
- 1959 at Holloman AFB, N.M. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 14. Project officer and pilot, Capt. Joseph W.
- Kittinger, Jr., standing beside the EXCELSIOR gondola at Holloman
- AFB, N.M. On his third and final high altitude parachute jump, from
- 102,800 feet, he established world records for highest parachute
- jump and length of free-fall which still stand today. (_U.S. Air
- Force photo_)]
-
- =Project EXCELSIOR.= In 1959 and 1960 the U.S. Air Force Aero
- Medical Laboratory collaborated with the Holloman Balloon Branch
- for Project EXCELSIOR, the second Air Force manned high altitude
- balloon program. EXCELSIOR was the dramatic climax of the high
- altitude free-fall studies that began as Project HIGH DIVE in 1953
- using anthropomorphic dummies. As the test director for Project
- Excelsior, Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. made three parachute
- jumps from balloons, EXCELSIOR I, II, and III, from 76,000,
- 75,000, and a still standing record altitude of 102,800 feet.
- EXCELSIOR’S scientific objective was to develop a parachute system
- and techniques required to return a pilot or astronaut to earth
- following an emergency high altitude escape.
-
- =Project STARGAZER.= Project STARGAZER was the third Air Force
- manned high altitude balloon program. Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger.
- Jr., the veteran high altitude balloon pilot of MAN HIGH and
- EXCELSIOR, was both the pilot and project engineer. On December
- 13, 1962, Kittinger and U.S. Navy civilian astronomer William C.
- White rose to 86,000 feet to make astronomical observations with
- a gyro-stabilized telescope. A joint U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy,
- Smithsonian Institution, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- program, STARGAZER made only one of a scheduled four flights due to
- budget shortfalls and equipment difficulties.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 15. Project STARGAZER pilot and project
- engineer, Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. (_left_), after landing
- near Lordsburg, N.M. on December 13, 1962 with U.S. Navy civilian
- astronomer William C. White. Kittinger and White ascended to 86,000
- feet to make astronomical observations in the seventh, and final,
- U.S. Air Force manned high altitude balloon flight. (_U.S. Air
- Force photo_)]
-
-
- Table 2.4
- U.S. Air Force Manned High Altitude Balloon Flights
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Date Project/Flight Altitude (feet) Pilot
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- 6/2/57 MAN HIGH I 96,200 Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.
-
- 8/19/57 MAN HIGH II 101,500 Lt. Col. David G. Simons (MC)
-
- 10/8/58 MAN HIGH III 99,700 1st Lt. Clifton McClure
-
- 11/16/59 EXCELSIOR I 76,400 Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.
-
- 12/11/59 EXCELSIOR II 74,700 Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger. Jr.
-
- 8/16/60 EXCELSIOR III 102,800 Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.
-
- 12/13/62 STARGAZER 86,000 Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.
-
-With the completion of Project STARGAZER and the success of NASA’s
-Project MERCURY space flights, future investigations were accomplished
-by space vehicles. This signaled the end of an era of manned high
-altitude balloon flight; however, these projects had indeed “bridged
-the gap,” and manned space flight was now safely possible.
-
-
-Low Altitude Balloon Training Missions
-
-=Background.= In April 1958, Col. John P. Stapp, commander of the U.S.
-Air Force Aero Medical Laboratory at Wright-Patterson AFB, appointed a
-new project officer for Project EXCELSIOR, Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger,
-Jr. EXCELSIOR was part of an ongoing program to examine high altitude
-aircraft escape procedures and equipment.[168] Kittinger was an
-experienced fighter test pilot who was the pilot of the first Air Force
-manned high altitude balloon project, MAN HIGH I, in June 1957.[169]
-In addition to being the EXCELSIOR project officer, Kittinger was
-the pilot and project engineer of STARGAZER which also utilized high
-altitude balloons.
-
-By 1959, Kittinger was an integral part of both EXCELSIOR and STARGAZER
-and one of only three individuals in the Air Force with high altitude
-balloon pilot experience. Due to the hazardous nature of these
-important projects, Stapp was concerned that an injury to Kittinger
-might result in the cancellation of one or both of them. Therefore,
-Stapp determined there was a need for backup pilots. Selected as backup
-pilots were Captains Dan D. Fulgham and William C. Kaufman. Both men
-were rated aircraft pilots, parachutists, and research and development
-officers assigned to the Aero Medical Laboratory at Wright-Patterson
-AFB.
-
-During the third week of May 1959, a series of low altitude manned
-balloon flights were flown to train Fulgham and Kaufman.[170] These
-flights were launched by the Holloman AFB Balloon Branch. To satisfy
-safety requirements, the flights were closely monitored by medical
-personnel at all times. A helicopter with medical personnel followed
-the flights during daylight hours, a C-131 aircraft followed during
-hours of darkness, and at all times medical personnel followed in an
-ambulance.[171] Balloon recovery and communications technicians also
-followed the missions on the ground in a communications vehicle and a
-balloon recovery vehicle.[172] The safety requirements were a result of
-several recent balloon mishaps that resulted in serious injuries to the
-pilots.
-
-To meet the training schedule, Kittinger, Kaufman and Fulgham were
-assigned temporary duty (TDY) from the Aero Medical Laboratory at
-Wright-Patterson AFB to the Balloon Branch at Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 16. In 1958 while training for the upcoming
- U.S. Air Force Aero Medical Laboratory high altitude MAN HIGH III
- balloon flight, balloon designer Otto C. Winzen (_right_) and
- space physiologist Capt. Grover Schock (_left_), were seriously
- injured in a balloon accident near Ashland, Wisc. Additionally,
- two training flights at Holloman AFB also resulted in injuries to
- pilots. These injuries prompted Air Force officials to require
- close medical supervision during future training flights. (_photo
- courtesy of Mike Smith, Raven Industries_)]
-
-The three pilots, Kittinger, Kaufman and Fulgham, flew training
-missions together. Kaufman and Fulgham alternately flew the balloon
-while Kittinger instructed. The missions were flown at night to take
-advantage of light winds and avoid the effects of diurnal heating on
-the helium (the lifting gas that filled the balloon). Used for these
-missions were 30-foot diameter polyethylene balloons and an aluminum
-gondola especially designed for low altitude training.
-
-The first training mission scheduled for May 19, 1959 was canceled due
-to equipment problems.[173] Problems overcome, the next day at 1:30
-a.m. the mission launched from White Sands Proving Ground.[174] The
-objective of this flight was to practice gas valving and ballasting
-techniques necessary for balloon control and to practice landings.
-After a five-hour flight, the balloon landed without incident just
-after sunrise northwest of El Paso, Texas.[175]
-
-The second training flight, launched at 2:41 a.m. on May 21, 1959, from
-behind the Balloon Branch building, Bldg. 850 at Holloman AFB.[176]
-Near the end of another successful training mission with the same
-objectives as the previous flight, a mishap occurred resulting in
-injuries to two of the pilots, Fulgham and Kittinger.[177]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 17. In May 1959, Capt. Dan D. Fulgham (_left_)
- and Capt. William C. Kaufman, pilots and Aero Medical Research
- officers from Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio were assigned temporary
- duty to Holloman AFB, N.M. to train as high altitude balloon
- pilots. Fulgham and Kaufman were trained by Capt. Joseph W.
- Kittinger, Jr. (_photo collection of Dan D. Fulgham_)]
-
-=The Mishap.= Just after sunrise on May 21, 1959, following a
-successful low level training flight east of Holloman AFB over the
-Sacramento Mountains, Kittinger, the instructor pilot, determined
-the balloon should be landed in a small field approximately 10 miles
-northwest of Roswell.[178] This was necessary because of approaching
-bad weather and the field was the last suitable landing site before
-overflying the city of Roswell.[179] When the balloon touched down,
-a higher than normal forward velocity for landing caused the gondola
-to overturn.[180] The three pilots, Kittinger, Fulgham, and Kaufman,
-were spilled from the gondola pinning Fulgham’s head between the edge
-of the gondola and the ground.[181] The impact shattered his helmet
-and he sustained a head injury.[182] When the three pilots climbed out
-from under the gondola, Fulgham noticed that his “head seemed to be
-protruding outward from underneath [his] helmet.”[183] Kittinger also
-received an injury, a minor facial laceration. The crew of the nearby
-chase helicopter and personnel in the ground tracking vehicles rushed
-to the scene.[184] For medical treatment, the pilots were transported
-by the helicopter to nearby Walker AFB.[185]
-
-When the helicopter landed at Walker AFB, it was met by armed security
-personnel who sought to verify the purpose of the unannounced
-arrival.[186] The security personnel escorted the balloon pilots to
-the hospital.[187] The balloon recovery and communications crew, after
-retrieving the gondola and balloon, drove to Walker AFB to check on the
-injured crew and to inform the Balloon Branch at Holloman AFB of the
-accident.[188]
-
-At the Walker AFB hospital, Fulgham and Kittinger received treatment
-for their injuries and neither required admission. Meanwhile, the
-Walker AFB security officials continued to escort the unannounced
-visitors while verifying their identities.[189] The pilot’s identities
-and purpose for their visit were confirmed via phone by Colonel Stapp,
-Aero Medical Laboratory commander at Wright-Patterson AFB (the pilots
-and Project EXCELSIOR were assigned to this organization).[190]
-
-Kittinger, the EXCELSIOR project officer, wanted to leave the
-hospital as quickly as possible after he and Fulgham received medical
-attention.[191] The quick departure was to avoid unwanted scrutiny by
-Walker AFB flying safety officials.[192] When released by the flight
-surgeon, the three pilots boarded the chase helicopter and returned to
-Holloman AFB approximately 100 miles to the west.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 18. The balloon training missions flown from
- Holloman AFB, N.M. in May 1959, were made in an open gondola
- suspended beneath a 30-foot diameter polyethylene balloon. This
- photo was taken on May 21, 1959 by Balloon Branch communications
- technician, A2C Ole Jorgeson just prior to the mishap which
- resulted in injuries to two of the pilots. (_photo collection of
- Ole Jorgeson_)]
-
-
-
-
- 2.4
-
- Comparison of the Hospital Account to the Balloon Mishap
-
-
-The balloon mishap near Roswell on May 21, 1959 provides the probable
-explanation for some of the remaining elements of the incident
-profile—the redheaded captain, the unusual security at the hospital,
-the wreckage in the rear of an ambulance, and one portion of the
-accounts of “aliens” at the Roswell AAF hospital.
-
-
-The “Redheaded Captain”
-
-It is highly probable that the descriptions of a redheaded captain
-are those of Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., now a retired Colonel.
-Kittinger, who has red hair, was present at the Walker AFB hospital the
-entire time the events involving the balloon mishap took place. This
-is the second Roswell account that describes a captain with red hair.
-As related in Section One of this report (see page 77 and Appendix
-C, page 194), a redheaded captain was also allegedly present at the
-“crashed saucer” site on the San Agustin Plains.[193] That account
-was consistent with Kittinger’s responsibilities as the EXCELSIOR and
-STARGAZER pilot and project officer. As project officer of two research
-programs that utilized high altitude balloons and as a chase pilot on
-many other high altitude balloon missions, Kittinger often accompanied
-balloon launch and recovery crews. He was present both on the ground
-and in the air at balloon launch and recovery locations throughout
-New Mexico and the Southwest United States to launch and retrieve
-anthropomorphic dummies used for Project EXCELSIOR and unmanned test
-gondolas used for Project STARGAZER.[194]
-
-Following the accident, when the balloon pilots were transported to
-the Walker AFB hospital for medical treatment, Kittinger wanted to
-leave as soon as possible.[195] He recalled in a recent interview that
-his desire to quickly leave Walker AFB was to avoid the initiation
-of a formal accident investigation. He believed that an accident
-investigation might bring unwanted scrutiny to Project EXCELSIOR and
-delay or even cancel the controversial project.[196] The controversy
-surrounding Project EXCELSIOR was due principally to the hazardous
-nature of the high altitude escape research. Some senior research
-and development officials within the Air Force were reluctant to
-support a project that required a human subject to parachute from
-a balloon gondola at over 100,000 feet. An accident investigation
-at this juncture would most likely delay the human high altitude
-free-fall tests scheduled for the fall of 1959 and may have resulted in
-cancellation of the project.[197]
-
-While at the hospital, Kittinger consulted by phone with his commander,
-Colonel Stapp.[198] Stapp agreed with Kittinger’s assessment that
-a quick departure from the Walker AFB hospital, after receiving
-appropriate medical attention, was in the best interest of the
-project.[199]
-
-The statements attributed to the redheaded captain, “You did not see
-anything. There was no crash here. You don’t go into town making any
-rumors that you saw anything or that there was any crash,”[200] were
-consistent with Kittinger’s desire to avoid an accident investigation.
-However, when interviewed for this report, neither Kittinger nor any
-of the other persons documented as having been present in the hospital
-that day recalled encountering Dennis.[201]
-
-What may have led an uninformed person, such as Dennis, to believe
-they were witnessing, or were told of, an unusual or classified event,
-was that when the injured balloon pilots arrived at the Walker AFB
-hospital, even though Project EXCELSIOR was unclassified, Kittinger
-sought to limit disclosure of negative information and publicity.[202]
-
-By 1959, having been the subject of intense media scrutiny following
-his June 1957 MAN HIGH I high altitude balloon flight, Kittinger
-was aware of both the positive and negative aspects of publicity.
-In his 1961 book, _The Long, Lonely Leap_, Kittinger described this
-self-imposed secrecy regarding Project EXCELSIOR, “The secrecy imposed
-upon EXCELSIOR was of our own choosing. We believed ... that any
-unnecessary conversation about our activities ... would simply be
-premature.”[203] When interviewed for this report, Kittinger further
-explained of Project EXCELSIOR and the visit to the hospital at Walker
-AFB: “We didn’t want publicity ... about anything we were doing. So it
-would have appeared to someone not conversant with the project that we
-were ‘hush-hush,’ that we were secretive ... it might look like we were
-trying to cover up a classified mission.”[204]
-
-The allegations that the redheaded captain, an apparent reference to
-Kittinger, threatened anyone while he was at the Walker AFB hospital
-are untrue. When interviewed for this report and in signed statements
-obtained from Kittinger, the two other balloon pilots, the doctor who
-treated them, the medic aboard the helicopter, and the Balloon Branch
-communications technician who were present at the hospital that day
-(see Appendix B), none of them recalled that Kittinger was involved in
-an altercation or made threatening remarks to anyone.[205] Involvement
-in an altercation with a civilian would have highlighted the presence
-of the balloon crew and possibly brought the type of negative
-publicity Kittinger sought to avoid. This would not only have violated
-Kittinger’s policy of maintaining a low profile in regard to EXCELSIOR,
-but would be completely out of character for the seasoned test pilot.
-
-Throughout his career, Kittinger was renowned for his ability
-to maintain his composure in difficult, often life threatening,
-situations. He faced these situations as a test pilot, as a combat
-pilot and squadron commander in Southeast Asia, and as a Prisoner
-of War while subjected to severe torture at the hands of the North
-Vietnamese. In _The Pre-Astronauts_, which chronicles many of
-Kittinger’s accomplishments in the field of aeronautics, including
-Project EXCELSIOR and STARGAZER, the author offered the following
-description of him:
-
- _Kittinger was not Buck Rogers, nor was he a daredevil or
- thrill-seeker. He was a modern day test pilot: intense, focused,
- usually quiet, and always polite with firm religious convictions
- and a powerful sense of loyalty. If he was often stubborn,
- uncompromising, and demanding he also dealt fairly and respectfully
- with those who came into contact with him. He was a straight arrow
- and a straight shooter._[206]
-
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 19. Maj. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. in 1963 as a
- member of the 1st Air Commando Wing, Ben Hoa, Republic of Vietnam.
- (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-
- Colonel Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., USAF (Ret)
-
- Colonel Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.’s career in the U.S. Air Force
- and in aviation has spanned the spectrum of experiences: test
- pilot, balloon pilot, test parachutist, combat fighter pilot, MiG
- killer, combat squadron commander, and prisoner of war. He has
- demonstrated, during a nearly 30-year military career and beyond,
- that he is among the very best in the U.S. Air Force and the field
- of aeronautics.
-
- Kittinger began his career in 1949 as a U.S. Air Force aviation
- cadet. After earning his wings at Las Vegas AFB, Nev. in March
- 1950, he was assigned to fighter squadrons in Germany and then as
- a test pilot for NATO. In 1953, Kittinger received an assignment
- as a test pilot to Holloman AFB, N.M. While at Holloman, he began
- a many year collaboration with the legendary Air Force scientist
- and physician, Col. John P. Stapp. In association with Stapp on
- numerous aero medical projects, Kittinger became the first pilot
- to fly zero-gravity experiments, now commonly used for astronaut
- training. For project MAN HIGH on June 2, 1957, Kittinger piloted a
- high altitude balloon to 96,000 feet to examine the physiological
- and psychological effects on man in a space equivalent environment.
- This flight marked the origins of the manned U.S. space program
- with the experience gained from MAN HIGH being incorporated in
- NASA’s Project MERCURY.
-
- After MAN HIGH, and again in association with Stapp, Kittinger
- directed Project EXCELSIOR, a study of human free-fall
- characteristics following aircraft escape at extremely high
- altitudes. After extensive testing with anthropomorphic dummies,
- Kittinger made three parachute jumps from high altitude balloons:
- 76,400 feet on November 16, 1959; 74,700 feet on December 11,
- 1959; and 102,800 feet on August 16, 1960. For these courageous
- scientific achievements Kittinger was awarded the Distinguished
- Flying Cross, the Harmon Trophy by President Eisenhower, the
- still-standing world records for highest parachute jump and length
- of a free-fall—and the distinction of being the only living person
- to exceed the speed of sound without an aircraft or spacecraft!
-
- With the completion of EXCELSIOR, Kittinger became the pilot,
- project officer, and project engineer for STARGAZER, an
- astronomical observation experiment. This was the third and final
- Air Force manned high altitude balloon project, Kittinger had flown
- in all three.
-
- In 1963, he was assigned to the Air Commandos (now Special
- Operations) and flew two combat tours in Southeast Asia in B-26
- and A-26 aircraft. After a tour in Germany as a liaison officer
- with the U.S. Army Special Forces, Kittinger returned to Southeast
- Asia in 1971, flying F-4 aircraft and commanding the famous 555th
- “Triple Nickel” Tactical Fighter Squadron at Udorn AB, Thailand. On
- March 1, 1972 Kittinger engaged and destroyed a MiG-21 over North
- Vietnam and is credited with an aerial victory. On May 11, 1972,
- after 483 combat missions and more than 1,000 combat flying hours,
- Kittinger was shot down over Hanoi and spent 11 months as a POW in
- the infamous “Hanoi Hilton.” When placed with other POWs following
- solitary confinement and severe torture, Kittinger was moved
- repeatedly by his North Vietnamese captors due to his effectiveness
- in motivating other prisoners to maintain strong resistance
- postures.
-
- Kittinger retired from the Air Force in 1978 and became involved
- in both sport aircraft flying and gas ballooning. He operated
- Rosie O’Grady’s Flying Circus in his hometown of Orlando, Fla.,
- performing skywriting, banner towing, and hot air and helium
- balloon demonstrations at nearby Walt Disney World. He also
- captured the coveted Gordon Bennett Gas Balloon Championship an
- unprecedented four times (three consecutive), entitling him to
- retire the trophy.
-
- In September 1984, Kittinger made history again, when, in the
- tradition of Lindbergh, he became the first person to make a solo
- crossing of the Atlantic Ocean by balloon.
-
- Kittinger’s military decorations include the Silver Star with
- one oak leaf cluster, Legion of Merit with one oak leaf cluster,
- Distinguished Flying Cross with five oak leaf clusters, Bronze Star
- Medal with “V” device and two oak leaf clusters, Air Medal with
- 23 oak leaf clusters, Purple Heart with one oak leaf cluster, POW
- medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with Palm.
-
- Kittinger’s indomitable spirit, personal courage and dedication to
- duty are legendary. His ability to achieve seemingly unattainable
- objectives while earning the respect and absolute loyalty of those
- who served with him defines this rare breed of warrior-leader.
-
- In October 1995, he received yet another honor and was named a
- recipient of the prestigious “Elder Statesman of Aviation” award by
- the National Aeronautics Association. This honor is bestowed upon
- an individual who over a period of years, has made “significant
- contributions to aeronautics” and for “reflecting credit upon
- himself and America.” Without a doubt, there are few that exemplify
- these virtues more than this truly distinctive American, Joseph W.
- Kittinger, Jr.
-
-
-The “Wreckage” in the Rear of the Ambulance
-
-The various types of wreckage described in the rear of an ambulance at
-the Walker AFB hospital also appear to be related to the 1959 balloon
-accident. Some of this wreckage allegedly had odd inscriptions, touted
-by UFO theorists as “alien” hieroglyphics.
-
-A requirement of balloon pilot training missions were that they be
-closely monitored by balloon recovery and medical personnel.[207]
-Ground crews from Holloman AFB followed the balloon flight from
-its launch site there to its landing site 10 miles northwest of
-Roswell.[208] Two of the vehicles that followed the balloon were Dodge
-M-43 ¾-ton field ambulances and a third was an M-37 ¾-ton utility
-vehicle or “weapons carrier.”[209] One ambulance was assigned to this
-mission for its standard use—a medical response vehicle. The other
-ambulance had been converted by the Holloman AFB Balloon Branch and
-served as a communications vehicle on balloon recovery missions.[210]
-The additional communications equipment, mounted in the rear
-compartment of the ambulance, drastically altered what someone expected
-to see in an ambulance of this type.
-
-Dennis related that he was walking fast when he observed what he
-thought was wreckage in the rear of an ambulance.[211] This quick
-glance apparently resulted in descriptions of two pieces of wreckage
-leaning against the interior of the rear compartment of the ambulance
-that “was kind of like the bottom of a canoe ... like stainless steel
-... with kind of a bluish-purplish tinge to it.”[212] UFO theorists
-have suggested that these objects were alien spaceship “escape pods”
-recovered by the Army Air Forces. However, this appears to be a
-remarkably accurate description of two steel panels painted Air Force
-blue on a converted ambulance used by the Balloon Branch for this
-mission.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 20. Balloon Branch Communications Technician,
- A2C Ole Jorgeson, now a retired Master Sergeant, in the rear
- compartment of an M-43 ambulance. Ambulances of this type were
- converted by the Balloon Branch to communications vehicles in
- the late 1950s. It appears the witness described the two panels
- painted Air Force blue (_lower right and left of ambulance_)
- as “bluish-purplish” “wreckage” that looked “kinda like the
- bottom of a canoe” and the stenciled writing above them as
- “hieroglyphics”—See figs. 21 and 22 on next page. (_photo
- collection of Ole Jorgeson_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 21. (_Above_) Enlargement of stenciled writing
- from photograph below. This lettering was apparently later
- described as “hieroglyphics.”]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 22. (_Below_) Steel panels painted Air Force
- blue (_lower right and left_) described as “bluish-purplish”
- “wreckage” that looked “kinda like the bottom of a canoe.” (_U.S.
- Air Force photo_)]
-
-The “inscription or something,”[213] the so called “hieroglyphics,”
-were a probable reference to the lettering painted on the equipment
-support rack above the panels. The lettering on the rack would be
-visible, but probably not readable, to an observer that quickly walked
-past the ambulance. Other wreckage “all over the floor” that was “like
-broken glass,”[214] was a probable reference to the clear plastic
-30-foot polyethylene balloon that was recovered following the balloon
-training mission and placed in the back of the converted ambulance or
-the weapons carrier for later disposal.
-
-Dennis also recalled that he parked the vehicle he was driving
-near three field ambulances and then walked up the ramp into the
-hospital.[215] The description of ambulances near a “ramp” is
-consistent with the recollections of the Balloon Branch Communication
-Technician who drove the converted ambulance to the Walker AFB hospital
-following the balloon accident. While waiting for the injured pilots,
-A2C Ole Jorgeson, now a retired Master Sergeant, recalled in a recent
-interview that he parked the converted ambulance near a ramp at the
-hospital.[216] A review of Walker AFB hospital records revealed
-that there was only one ramp. The ramp was attached to the hospital
-dispensary, Walker AFB Bldg. 317.[217] The other ambulances described
-by the witness were either the other ambulance from Holloman AFB that
-provided medical support of the balloon flight or the two “standby”
-ambulances, that in May 1959, were routinely positioned adjacent to the
-ramp behind the dispensary at Walker AFB.[218]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 23. “It was all sharp ... like broken glass,”
- a witness’ description of debris in the rear of an ambulance at
- Walker AFB. The debris described was most probably the remnants
- of the polyethylene balloon, similar to the one in this photo,
- recovered by Balloon Branch personnel following the mishap in May
- 1959. (_U.S. Air Force photo_) ]
-
-
-Additional Security at the Walker AFB Hospital
-
-The witness described what appeared to be a heightened state of
-security at the hospital when he allegedly took the injured airman
-there for treatment. UFO theorists contend the heightened security at
-the hospital was because alien remains were being autopsied. However,
-it appears that the witness described the security measures taken by
-Walker AFB personnel due to the unusual circumstances of the arrival of
-the balloon crew.
-
-In 1959, Walker AFB was a part of the 47th Air Division of Strategic
-Air Command (SAC). It was home of the 6th Bombardment Wing (6th BW),
-equipped with the nuclear capable B-52 Stratofortress bomber (the
-509th BW was reassigned to Pease AFB, NH on July 1, 1958).[219] The
-mission of the 6th BW, to strike the enemy with nuclear weapons
-anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice, demanded a heightened state
-of security at all times. One of the methods instituted during this
-period to maintain the high standards of security and effectiveness
-of SAC units, was unannounced “surprise” visits of Headquarters SAC
-inspection teams. A favored method of transportation for these surprise
-visits was a helicopter. When a SAC inspection team landed at a base,
-often the first evaluation they made was of the security response to
-their unannounced arrival. Failure of security personnel to properly
-challenge unidentified visitors, regardless of their method of arrival,
-was considered a serious breach of security.
-
-When transported to Walker AFB for medical treatment, unexpected and at
-an early hour, the balloon crew, not surprisingly, was met by armed
-security personnel.[220] The security personnel escorted them to the
-hospital and remained with them until their identities and purpose of
-their visit were verified. Kaufman, one of the balloon pilots, recalled
-that their presence at Walker AFB was initially met with skepticism.
-
-“The [helicopter] pilot called the tower and said ... having come from
-an experimental base, it was nothing unusual for him to have a balloon
-accident. ‘We’ve got an injured pilot on board. There’s been a balloon
-accident and we would like the flight surgeon and an ambulance to meet
-us at the tower.’ The tower established the fact that yes, we were an
-Air Force chopper and that we seemed to have somebody injured and what
-had we been doing? We had been shooting touch and go landings in a
-balloon?... We got clearance to land ... right in front of the tower,
-and we were met by an ambulance and several MPs with machine guns.”[221]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 24. Walker AFB Building 317, hospital
- dispensary with attached ramp, as it appeared in June 1954. It is
- in this building that UFO theorists allege that “alien autopsies”
- were accomplished in July 1947. However, this was the same building
- that Capt. Fulgham received treatment following the balloon
- accident on May 21, 1959. Persons apparently observed him and later
- related the unusual circumstances surrounding the balloon mishap as
- part of the “Roswell Incident.” (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 25. Main gate at Walker AFB, N.M., formerly
- Roswell AAF, as it appeared in 1954. During the 1950s, the highly
- secure base was the home of the nuclear capable 509th and 6th
- Bombardment Wings of Strategic Air Command. (_U.S. Air Force
- photo_)]
-
-According to the medical technician who arrived on the helicopter
-with the pilots, he had difficulty persuading a flight surgeon to
-attend to the injured pilots. SSgt. Roland H. “Hap” Lutz, now a
-retired Chief Master Sergeant, recalled when he first contacted the
-Walker AFB hospital explaining that he had three persons injured in a
-“gondola accident,” the flight surgeon told him to “Go home and sleep
-it off.”[222] Fulgham, the injured pilot, recalled that when they got
-to the hospital, “there was this controversy going on in the hospital
-about who in the hell we were ... we weren’t supposed to be there and
-nobody knew anything about Air Force officers flying balloons ... we
-could have been ... [trying] to penetrate the security.”[223] Walker
-AFB security officials were satisfied of the pilots’ identities when
-they spoke to Colonel Stapp, commander of the Aero Medical Laboratory
-at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 26. Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr. (_right_),
- is shown here in 1962 with Dr. J. Allen Hynek while preparing for
- the project STARGAZER high altitude balloon flight. (_U.S. Air
- Force photo_)]
-
-
- The “Red-headed Captain” and Dr. J. Allen Hynek
-
- Captain Kittinger, the STARGAZER high altitude balloon pilot and
- project engineer, had extensive professional contact with Dr.
- J. Allen Hynek, an astronomer and STARGAZER project scientist.
- Additionally, Hynek was also one of the scientific consultants in
- the Air Force study of UFOs, Project BLUEBOOK. Hynek is best known,
- however, for his apparent endorsement of extraterrestrial theories
- concerning UFOs after concluding his associations with the Air
- Force.
-
- When asked about his recollections of Hynek, Kittinger stated
- that when they were associated, from 1958 to 1963, they discussed
- UFOs at length.[224] At that time, Hynek was steadfast in his
- opinion that most, if not all, UFO sightings could be resolved by
- applying known scientific analysis.[225] Kittinger said he was
- “flabbergasted” when, years later, Hynek appeared to reverse his
- opinion and endorse extraterrestrial explanations.[226] Hynek’s
- reversal in philosophies led to numerous commercial endeavors, most
- notably as a technical advisor for the science-fiction film _Close
- Encounters of the Third Kind_.
-
- Also, based on his experience with project STARGAZER, Hynek was
- familiar with balloon operations at Holloman AFB, visiting the
- Holloman Balloon Branch several times.[227] Interestingly, there
- is no record that Hynek, who died in 1986, ever endorsed what is
- now presented as the “best evidence” of UFOs, the so-called Roswell
- Incident, which was actually a conglomeration of numerous events,
- some with origins in Holloman AFB launched balloons.
-
-
-The Alien at the Hospital
-
-In at least one account of the Roswell Incident, a witness claimed he
-observed a “creature” walk under its own power into the hospital.[228]
-While the specifics of this particular sighting cannot be verified,
-the injury that caused Fulgham’s head to swell, resembling the classic
-science-fiction alien head, makes this account (and some others) that
-at first appeared to be the work of over-active imaginations, seem
-possible.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 27. Clinical Record Cover Sheet from medical
- records of Capt. Dan D. Fulgham describing injuries he received in
- the balloon accident on May 21, 1959.
-
- CLINICAL RECORD COVER SHEET 8511
-
- 1. ADMISSION NOTES
- 1045 hrs
- A or N: No
-
- 2. WARD 1
-
- 3. TYPE OF CASE
- IRJ
-
- 4. LAST NAME—FIRST NAME—MIDDLE INITIAL
- FULGHAM Dan D
-
- 5. SEX
- M
-
- 6. Religion
- P
-
- 7. PREV. ADM.
- NO
-
- 8. REGISTER NO.
- 16059
-
- 9. SERVICE NO.
- 44734A
-
- 10. GRADE
- Capt
-
- 11. RATING OR DESIG.
- Sr Pilot
-
- 12. DEPARTMENT
- Air Force
-
- 13. ORGANIZATION AND BRANCH OF SERVICE
- ARDC Wright Patterson(a)
-
- 14. FLYING STATUS
- Yes
-
- 15. NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMERGENCY ADDRESSEE
- Joyce Fulgham (W)
- 5540 Gross Drive Dayton Ohio
-
- 16. AGE
- 31
-
- 17. RACE
- Cau
-
- 18. LENGTH OF SERVICE
- 12 yrs
-
- 19. DATE OF ADMISSION
- 12 May 59
-
- 20. SOURCE OF ADMISSION
- From duty
-
- 21. ADMITTING OFFICER
- L. E. Eason Capt USAF MC
-
- 22. CONTINUATION OF ITEMS 12 AND 20.
- (a) AFB, Ohio
-
- 23. DIAGNOSES
- 8715 Hematoma, traumatic, n.e.c. forehead LD: Pending AF Form 348
-
- AI: Approximately 0600 hours, 21 May 1959, North of Roswell, New
- Mexico, patient states he was taking part in a military project
- involving balloon testing. When he and two others landed in the
- balloon the “gondola” upset, and hit him in the head causing injury.
-
- 24. OPERATIONS AND SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES
- None
-
- 25. SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
- None
-
- 26. PHYSICAL PROFILE
-
- 27. DATE DURATION THIS FACILITY
-
- ALL 3 IN HOSPITAL OR INFIRMARY 3
-
- 28. NATURE OF DISPOSITION
- Duty
-
- 29. DATE OF DISPOSITION
- 24 May 59
-
- 30. SIGNATURE OF ATTENDING PHYSICIAN
- LESLIE E EASON CAPT USAF HC
-
- 31. SIGNATURE OF REGISTRAR OR RECORDS OFFICER
- ROLAND E DOZOIS CWD W-3 USAF
-
- 32. NAME AND LOCATION OF MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITY
- 6580TH USAF HOSPITAL HOLLOMAN AFB NM
-
- 33. REGISTER NUMBER
- 16059
-]
-
-When the balloon gondola struck Fulgham’s head, he received, according
-to his clinical record from May 21, 1959, an “Extensive hematoma
-forehead and ant [anterior] scalp.”[229] A hematoma is a localized
-blood-filled swelling, that in this instance was on the forehead. The
-hematoma resulted in immediate facial swelling, two black eyes and
-later caused his skin to turn yellow.[230]
-
-The rapid onset of the swelling caused both of Fulgham’s eyes to
-close. As it progressed, according to Kittinger who accompanied
-Fulgham at the hospital, “His whole face had swollen up and his
-nose barely protruded.”[231] This appearance lead Kittinger to
-characterize Fulgham’s appearance at the time as “just a big blob” and
-“grotesque.”[232]
-
-When interviewed, Fulgham remembered that even though he didn’t feel
-bad, “I didn’t know how bad I looked.” There was no attempt to hide
-or limit Fulgham’s exposure to persons in the hospital that day. In
-fact, when he arrived at the hospital Fulgham recalled that he stopped
-outside the building to smoke a cigarette. Kaufman also recalled that
-the injured pilots, Fulgham and Kittinger, waited for treatment on a
-bench in the hallway of the hospital. Kaufman added that a number of
-military wives were present in the hospital that day for prenatal care,
-and there was no effort to keep Fulgham from their view.[233]
-
- [Illustration: Fig 28. Capt. Dan D. Fulgham at Wright-Patterson
- AFB, Ohio several days after the balloon accident with a “traumatic
- hematoma” on his forehead. This photo shows Fulgham after blood
- had been aspirated from under his scalp and a substantial amount
- of swelling had dissipated. Concerns that Fulgham’s odd appearance
- might startle uninformed persons was why he was returned to
- Wright-Patterson AFB aboard a specially arranged flight from
- Holloman AFB, N.M. (_photo collection of Dan D. Fulgham_)]
-
-
-=“Bodies” with Large Heads and Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio=
-
-UFO theorists contend that the U.S. Army Air Forces secretly shipped
-the alien bodies with large heads to Wright-Patterson AFB for further
-processing and deep-freeze storage. However, it is likely that, in this
-account, this is a reference to Fulgham’s return to Wright-Patterson
-AFB following the balloon mishap.
-
-Although Fulgham did not require hospitalization at Walker AFB, upon
-his return to Holloman AFB he was admitted to the base hospital for
-observation. Three days later on May 24, 1959, the balloon pilots were
-flown from Holloman to Wright-Patterson AFB on a specially arranged
-flight aboard a C-131 hospital aircraft.[234]
-
-The return to Wright-Patterson AFB was directed by Stapp and
-coordinated by Kittinger.[235] The preliminary arrangements for this
-flight were made by Kittinger while at the Walker AFB hospital.[236]
-Kittinger recalled that conversations with Stapp regarding their
-return to Wright-Patterson AFB were made by phone in busy areas of the
-hospital and these conversations could have been overheard by nearly
-anyone present.[237]
-
-Upon their arrival at Wright-Patterson, Fulgham, who Kittinger did not
-want to transport on a commercial flight due to his odd appearance,
-still could not open his eyes and had to be led down the steps of the
-aircraft. Kittinger recalled that Fulgham’s wife was waiting at the
-bottom of the aircraft steps when they arrived.
-
-“They dropped the ramp and I looked down at the bottom and there was
-Dan Fulgham’s wife,” Kittinger said. “Dan couldn’t see ... so I grabbed
-him by the arm ... Dan’s wife sees me leading this blob down the
-staircase ... and she looks right at me and says, ‘Where’s my husband?’
-I said, ‘Ma’am, this is your husband’. I presented her this blob that I
-was leading down the ramp. And she let out this scream you could hear a
-mile away. He was such a horrendous looking thing that she had no idea
-that the thing I was leading down that ramp was her husband.”[238]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 29. As a physiologist for the space program,
- Fulgham (_third from left_) discusses Project GEMINI emergency
- escape systems at the U.S. Navy Aerospace Recovery facility at
- El Centro, Calif. on January 28, 1965. Shown with Fulgham (_from
- left_) are NASA astronaut Jim Lovell, NASA project engineer Hilary
- Ray, and NASA astronaut Alan Bean. (_U.S. Navy photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 30. A veteran of 100 combat missions during the
- Korean conflict, Fulgham flew 133 combat missions in F-4 aircraft
- (shown here) in 1966–67 as a member of the 555th “Triple Nickel”
- Tactical Fighter Squadron at Ubon Air Base, Thailand. (_photo
- collection of Dan D. Fulgham_)]
-
-Fulgham recalled that upon his return to work at the Aero Medical
-Laboratory he received reactions of “immediate compassionate sympathy”
-from persons he encountered, including his secretary, who cried when
-she saw him.[239] Within several weeks, Fulgham returned to flying
-status with no permanent effects. Fulgham went on to complete a
-distinguished career in the Air Force and retired as a colonel in 1978.
-Fulgham’s assignments included combat tours in fighter aircraft in
-both Korea and Vietnam, as well as an assignment as an experimental
-parachutist and physiologist for the space program.
-
-
- Summary
-
-In this section, documented research revealed that the reports of
-“bodies” at the Roswell AAF hospital were grossly inaccurate and most
-probably had origins in actual Air Force mishaps. Examinations of
-official records of the alleged primary witnesses revealed that the
-“missing nurse” was never missing, and the pediatrician did not arrive
-at the Walker AFB hospital until 1951—four years _after_ the alleged
-incident. The many fundamental errors in the story, combined with the
-substantial similarities to the actual mishaps, show that the most
-credible account associated with the “Roswell Incident” is certainly
-not extraterrestrial and is unrelated to any events that occurred in
-July 1947.
-
-
-
-
- Conclusion
-
-
-When critically examined, the claims that the U.S. Army Air Forces
-recovered a flying saucer and alien crew in 1947, were found to be
-a compilation of many verifiable events. For the most part, the
-descriptions collected by UFO theorists were of actual operations and
-tests carried out by the U.S. Air Force in the 1950s. Despite the
-usual unsavory accusations by UFO proponents of cover-up, conspiracy,
-intimidation, etc., documented research revealed that many of the
-activities were actually historic scientific achievements of which the
-Air Force is very proud. However, other descriptions are believed to be
-distorted references to Air Force members who were killed or injured in
-the line of duty. The incomplete and inaccurate intermingling of these
-actual events were grounded in just enough fact to weave a sensational
-story, but cannot withstand close scrutiny when compared to official
-records.
-
-To analyze reports of alien bodies that at first appeared to be so
-offbeat as to not be remotely based in fact, it was necessary to
-evaluate a wide range of books, interviews, videos, etc., that a
-less objective review might have rejected out of hand. Only through
-an inclusive evaluation of these sources were Air Force researchers
-able to understand the interconnectivity of the widely separated
-events believed responsible for this “incident.” And, in opposition
-to critics who believe Air Force research involving this subject is
-anything but objective, this research relied almost exclusively on
-the descriptions _=provided by the UFO proponents themselves=_. When
-collected and examined, the actual statements of the witnesses—not
-the extraterrestrial interpretations of UFO proponents—indicated that
-something was very wrong. When these descriptions were compared to
-documented Air Force activities, they were much too similar to be a
-coincidence. Soon, it became apparent that the witnesses or the UFO
-proponents who liberally interpreted their statements were either 1)
-confused, or 2) attempting to perpetrate a hoax, believing that no
-serious efforts would ever be taken to verify their stories.
-
-In preparing this report, attempts were made not to only explain
-_what_ conclusions were reached, but _how_ they were reached. This
-undertaking was to try to de-mystify the research process by outlining
-the simple and logical research techniques that identified the
-underlying actual events. In regard to statements of witnesses that
-were clearly descriptions of Air Force activities, such as those
-that described anthropomorphic dummies, these could be generously
-viewed as situational misunderstandings or even honest mistakes.
-Other descriptions, particularly those believed to be thinly veiled
-references to deceased or injured Air Force members, are difficult
-to view as naive misunderstandings. Any attempt to misrepresent or
-capitalize on tragic incidents in which Air Force members died or were
-injured in service to their country significantly alters what would
-otherwise be viewed as simple misinterpretations or honest mistakes.
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 31. Plaque placed at Holloman AFB honoring
- three Balloon Branch members killed during a high altitude balloon
- recovery when their L-20 balloon chase plane crashed in the rugged
- Gila Mountains near Stafford, Ariz. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)
-
- IN MEMORIAM
-
- WIRED P. CHAMPLAIN, 1ST LT. U.S.A.F. RONALD J. NIELSEN, AIRMAN 1/C
-
- U.S.A.F.
-
- ROBERT W. MITCHELL
-
- WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES IN THE RECOVERY OF INSTRUMENTS FROM THE
- STRATOSPHERE 25 AUGUST 1955]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 32. (_Left_) The balloon launch facility at
- Holloman AFB, N.M. was named in honor of Maj. Richard L. Nenninger
- who died of injuries received in an aircraft crash during a balloon
- recovery mission on April 7, 1970 in the Sacramento Mountains near
- Ruidoso, N.M. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
- [Illustration: Fig. 33. (_Right_) A semiconscious Capt. Joseph
- W. Kittinger, Jr., following the EXCELSIOR I parachute jump from
- 76,000 feet. With his parachute wrapped around his neck and body
- and hopelessly out of control, his life was saved by an ingeniously
- designed reserve parachute system that opened just moments before
- contacting the desert floor; White Sands Proving Ground, November
- 16, 1959. (_U.S. Air Force photo_)]
-
-Finally, after reviewing this report, some persons may legitimately ask
-why the Air Force expended time and effort to respond to mythical, if
-not comedic, allegations of recoveries of “flying saucers” and “space
-aliens.” The answer to those persons is:
-
- • Initially the Air Force was required to respond to an official
- request from the General Accounting Office.
-
- • High altitude balloon research, aircraft escape systems, and
- other technologies that were misrepresented as part of the Roswell
- Incident, accounted for significant contributions to the knowledge
- of the atmosphere, to the quest for space flight, and to the
- defense of this nation. The U.S. Air Force is exceedingly proud of
- these accomplishments. Distorted and incomplete descriptions of
- these activities do not pay tribute to these important exploits
- or to the individuals who, often at great personal risk, boldly
- carried them out.
-
- • A sobering reality of the mission of the U.S. Air Force, as
- evidenced by the aircraft mishaps described in this report, is
- that defending this nation is a dangerous profession. On a daily
- basis, members of the U.S. Air Force perform hazardous missions in
- many locations throughout the world. Unfortunately, these missions
- sometimes result in injuries or deaths. It is the right—and indeed
- the duty—of the Air Force to challenge those who attempt to exploit
- these human tragedies wherever, and whenever, they are discovered.
-
- • The misrepresentations of Air Force activities as an
- extraterrestrial “incident” is misleading to the public and is
- simply an affront to the truth.
-
-This comprehensive further examination of the so-called “Roswell
-Incident” found no evidence whatsoever of flying saucers, space aliens,
-or sinister government cover-ups. But, even if unintentionally, it did
-serve to highlight a series of events that embody the proud history of
-the finest air force in the world—the U.S. Air Force. The actual events
-examined here, rich in human and scientific triumph, tempered by the
-stark realities of the dangers of the Air Force mission, are but one
-small portion of that history. The many Air Force activities cobbled
-together in the ever changing collage that has become the “Roswell
-Incident,” when examined in the clear light of historical research,
-revealed a remarkable chapter of the Air Force story. In the final
-analysis, this examination simply illustrates once again, that fact is
-indeed stranger, and often much more fascinating, than fiction.
-
-
-
-
- Notes - Section One
-
-
-[1] Headquarters United States Air Force, _The Roswell Report: Fact vs.
-Fiction in the New Mexico Desert_ (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government
-Printing Office, 1995), 20–22.
-
-[2] ibid.
-
-[3] Don Berliner and Stanton T. Friedman, _Crash at Corona_ (New York:
-Paragon House, 1992), 14.
-
-[4] Headquarters United States Air Force, _The Roswell Report: Fact vs.
-Fiction in the New Mexico Desert_ (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government
-Printing Office, 1995), 20–22.
-
-[5] Ted Bloecher, _Report of the UFO Wave of 1947_ (Washington D.C.:
-author, 1967), I-13-14.
-
-[6] Combined History, 509th Bomb Group and Roswell Army Airfield, 1
-July-31 July 1947, 39, Air Force Historical Research Agency, Maxwell
-AFB, AL.
-
-[7] _Roswell Daily Record_, July 9, 1947, 1.
-
-[8] _Socorro_ (N.M.) _Defensor Chieftain_, November 4, 1992.
-
-[9] Don Berliner, _A Rebuttal of the Air Force Project Mogul
-Explanation for the 1947 Roswell, New Mexico, UFO Crash_ (Mount Ranier,
-Md.: The Fund for UFO Research, 1995), 2.
-
-[10] Headquarters United States Air Force, _The Roswell Report: Fact
-vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert_ (Washington D.C.: U.S. Government
-Printing Office, 1995), Attachment 32, _Synopsis of Balloon Research
-Findings_, by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, 9.
-
-[11] Don Berliner and Stanton T. Friedman, _Crash at Corona_ (New York:
-Paragon House, 1992), 14.
-
-[12] Video, _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Gerald Anderson
-interview (Washington, D.C.: Fund for UFO Research, 1993) (hereafter
-_Recollections of Roswell, Part II_).
-
-[13] James Ragsdale, transcript of interview with Donald R. Schmitt,
-January 26, 1994.
-
-[14] Frank J. Kaufman, interview with Kevin Randle and Donald Schmitt,
-January 27, 1990.
-
-[15] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Maltais interview.
-
-[16] ibid., Anderson interview.
-
-[17] ibid.
-
-[18] ibid., Maltais interview.
-
-[19] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[20] Charles Berlitz and William L. Moore, _The Roswell Incident_ (New
-York: Berkley, 1980), 61.
-
-[21] ibid.
-
-[22] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Alice Knight interview.
-
-[23] Ragsdale and _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson
-interview.
-
-[24] ibid.
-
-[25] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[26] Ragsdale.
-
-[27] James M. Grimwood, _Project Mercury: A Chronology_, Report No.
-SP4001 (Wash. D.C.: NASA, 1963) 2–3, and Lloyd Mallan, _Men, Rockets
-and Space Rats_, (New York: Julian Messier Inc., 1955) 84–98.
-
-[28] Research Division, College of Engineering, New York University,
-_Technical Report No. 93.02, Constant Level Balloons_, Section 3,
-_Summary of Flights_, July 15, 1949.
-
-[29] Capt. Vincent Mazza and Capt. Richard V. Wheeler, _High Altitude
-Bailouts_, MCREXD-695-66M (Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: USAF Air Materiel
-Command, September 18, 1950), 10–11.
-
-[30] A. M. Jacobs, “The Flier’s SOS,” _St. Nicholas Magazine_, Vol.
-LII, No. 10 (August 1925), 1034–1039.
-
-[31] ibid.
-
-[32] Memo, Major H.H. Arnold, Chief Field Service Section, to
-Commanding Officer, San Antonio Air Depot, subj: Drop Testing of
-Parachutes, November 2, 1929. National Air and Space Museum Archives,
-Paul E. Garber Facility, Silver Hill, Md., file no. 452.031,
-Parachutes-(Dummies) 1927–1929.
-
-[33] J. Allen Neal, _History: Development of Methods for Escape from
-High Speed Aircraft, Vol. 1_, (Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Air Research
-and Development Command, 1958), U.S. Air Force Museum Archives,
-Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.
-
-[34] Memo, Ted Smith, to W.A. Daler, subj: Bid for Purchase Request
-No. 301200, September 17, 1954, National Archives and Records
-Administration, Accession No. 342-67E-2954, box 5/15, file 28.
-
-[35] H.T.E. Hertzberg, _Anthropology of Anthropomorphic Dummies_, Air
-Force Medical Research Laboratory, AMRL-TR-69-61, February 1970, 3.
-
-[36] Maj. John P. Stapp, _Human Tolerance to Linear Deceleration,
-Part I. Preliminary Survey of the Aft Facing Seated Position_, Air
-Force Technical Report 5915, (Wright Patterson AFB, OH: Wright Air
-Development Center, 1949) and Maj. John P. Stapp, _Part II. The Aft
-Facing Position and the Development of a Crash Harness_, Air Force
-Technical Report 5915 (Wright Patterson AFB, OH: Wright Air Development
-Center, 1951).
-
-[37] H.T.E. Hertzberg, _Anthropology of Anthropomorphic Dummies_, Air
-Force Medical Research Laboratory, AMRL-TR-69-61, February 1970, 3.
-
-[38] ibid.
-
-[39] ltr., H.L. Daulton, Vice President and Secretary-Treasurer,
-Sierra Engineering Company, to W.A. Daler, Headquarters Air Materiel
-Command, subject: Proposal, Purchase Request No. 301200, September
-16, 1954, National Archives and Records Administration, Accession No.
-342-67E-2954, box 5/15, file 28.
-
-[40] Joseph Smreka, Senior Design Engineer, First Technology Safety
-Systems, “Dummies—Past and Present,” 2 (unpublished manuscript).
-
-[41] Sierra Engineering Co., “Sierra Sam,” 1955, National Archives and
-Records Administration, Accession No. 342-67E-2954, box 5/15, file 28.
-
-[42] 1st Lt. Raymond A. Madson, _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops,
-Part I. The Unstabilized Dummy Drops_, WADC Technical Report 57-477,
-(Wright Patterson AFB, OH: Wright Air Development Center, Oct 1957)
-(hereafter _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops Part I_), 27, and 1st
-Lt. Raymond A. Madson, _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, II. The
-Stabilized Dummy Drops_, WADC Technical Report 57-477 (II) (Wright
-Patterson AFB, OH: Aeronautical Systems Division, Air Force Systems
-Command, August 1961) (hereafter _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops
-Part II_), 18.
-
-[43] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops Part I_, 1.
-
-[44] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops Part I_, and _High Altitude
-Balloon Dummy Drops Part II_, and Holloman Air Development Center,
-Weekly Test Status Reports, Project MX-1450B (Manned Balloon), National
-Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center,
-St. Louis, MO, Accession No. 342-62A-A-641, box 115/248, folder;
-R-695-61D, “High Altitude Escape Studies, Gen B-1, Manned Balloon
-Flights.”
-
-[45] ibid.
-
-[46] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops Part I_, 1, and _High Altitude
-Balloon Dummy Drops Part II_, 18.
-
-[47] Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., _The Long, Lonely Leap_,
-(New York: E.P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1961), and Lt. Col. David G.
-Simons, _Man High_, (New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1960), and
-Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., “The Long, Lonely Leap,” _National
-Geographic_ 118, no. 6 (December 1960): 854-873, “Fantastic Catch
-in the Sky, Record Leap towards Earth,” _Life_ 49, no. 9 (August
-29, 1960): 20–25, _Popular Mechanics Magazine_, January 1951: 118,
-_Collier’s_, June 25, 1954, _Time_, September 12, 1955, “The Fastest
-Man on Earth”.
-
-[48] Don Reilly, “MAD Salutes an Unsung Hero,” _MAD_, no. 61, (March
-1961), 46.
-
-[49] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops Part I_, and _High Altitude
-Balloon Dummy Drops Part II_.
-
-[50] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops Part II_, 11–12.
-
-[51] Signed, sworn statement of Raymond A. Madson, Lt. Col., USAF (Ret)
-and _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part I_, 16.
-
-[52] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part I_, 5.
-
-[53] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part I_, 17.
-
-[54] ibid., and Memorandum, subj: Balloon Tracking and Recovery
-Equipment, n.d., National Archives and Records Administration,
-Accession No. 342-67B-2133, box 65/249, file 2, “Biophysics
-Branch-Escape Section, High Altitude Escape Studies, 7218-71719,”
-and Robert Blankenship, retired Balloon Branch Recovery Supervisor,
-telephone interview with 1st Lt. James McAndrew, July 14, 1995.
-
-[55] Signed, sworn statement of Raymond A. Madson, Lt. Col., USAF (Ret).
-
-[56] Blankenship, and Balloon Tracking and Recovery Equipment, n.d.,
-and Bernard D. Gildenberg, _Meteorological Aspects of Constant-Level
-Balloon Operations in the Southwestern United States_ (hereafter
-_Meteorological Aspects of Constant-Level Balloon Operations in the
-Southwestern United States_), AFCRL-66-706 (L.G. Hanscom Field,
-Bedford, MA: Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, October 1966),
-27.
-
-[57] Historical Branch, Office of Information Services, Air Force
-Missile Development Center, _Contributions of Balloon Operations to
-Research and Development at the Air Force Missile Development Center
-Holloman AFB, N. Mex. 1947–1958_ (Holloman AFB, NM: Air Research
-and Development Command, 1958) (hereafter _Contributions of Balloon
-Operations to Research and Development at the Air Force Missile
-Development Center, 1947–1958_), 90.
-
-[58] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part I_, 16.
-
-[59] ibid., 17.
-
-[60] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part I_, 17.
-
-[61] Maj. John P. Stapp, _Human Tolerance to Linear Deceleration,
-Part I. Preliminary Survey of the Aft Facing Seated Position_, Air
-Force Technical Report 5915, (Wright Patterson AFB, OH: Wright Air
-Development Center, 1949) and Maj. John P. Stapp, _Part II. The Aft
-Facing Position and the Development of a Crash Harness_, Air Force
-Technical Report 5915 (Wright Patterson AFB, OH: Wright Air Development
-Center, 1951).
-
-[62] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part II_, 6.
-
-[63] Signed, sworn statement of Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., Col., USAF
-(Ret).
-
-[64] ibid.
-
-[65] Alderson Research Laboratories, Inc., “Instructions for Operation
-and Maintenance, Model F-95 Anthropomorphic Test Dummies,” May 3,
-1956, 1, and Glenn Richards, retired Balloon Branch Instrumentation
-Specialist, telephone interview with Capt. James McAndrew, September 5,
-1995.
-
-[66] Alderson Research Laboratories, Inc., “Instructions for Operation
-and Maintenance, Model F-95 Anthropomorphic Test Dummies,” May 3,
-1956, 1, and Ronald G. Hansen, Lt. Col. USAR, (Ret), Balloon Recovery
-Helicopter Pilot, telephone interview with 1st Lt. James McAndrew, May
-1, 1995.
-
-[67] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part I_, 7–8.
-
-[68] Blankenship.
-
-[69] ibid.
-
-[70] _The Beverly Hills Citizen_, March 12, 1956, 7.
-
-[71] Research Division, College of Engineering, New York University,
-_Special Report No. 1, Constant Level Balloon_, May 1947, 20–22.
-
-[72] Research Division, College of Engineering, New York University,
-Technical Report No. 93.03, _Constant Level Balloons, Operations_,
-March 1, 1951, 105.
-
-[73] U.S. Air Force Phillips Laboratory, “Phillips Laboratory Space
-Experiments Directorate, Balloon, Rocket, and Satellite Capabilities,”
-n.d., 33.
-
-[74] Bernard D. Gildenberg, Balloon Branch Meteorologist and Engineer,
-interviewed by 1st Lt. James McAndrew, May 28, 1995, and _Contributions
-of Balloon Operations 1947–1958_, 73.
-
-[75] ibid.
-
-[76] ibid.
-
-[77] _Contributions of Balloon Operations 1947–1958_, 73.
-
-[78] “Flight Summary, Non-Extensible Balloon Operations, 6580th Test
-Squadron (Special), June 1950 to October 1954,” 22–24.
-
-[79] _Contributions of Balloon Operations 1947–1958_, 73–74.
-
-[80] Lt. Col. David G. Simons (MC), _Stratosphere Balloon Techniques
-for Exposing Living Specimens to Primary Cosmic Ray Particles_,
-Holloman Air Development Center TR 54-16, November 1954, 10–11.
-
-[81] “Flight Summary Non-Extensible Balloon Operations 6580th
-Test Squadron (Special), June 1950 to October 1954,” 1–31, and
-_Contributions of Balloon Operations 1947–1958_, 24.
-
-[82] “Flight Summary Non-Extensible Balloon Operations 6580th Test
-Squadron (Special), June 1950 to October 1954,” 4.
-
-[83] Research Division, College of Engineering, New York University,
-_Technical Report No. 93.02, Constant Level Balloons_, Section 3,
-_Summary of Flights_, July 15, 1949, 32, in Headquarters United States
-Air Force, _The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico
-Desert_ (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995),
-Appendix 12.
-
-[84] Holloman Air Development Center, “Test Report on Radar Target
-Balloons”, October 31, 1955, Air Force Historical Research Agency,
-Maxwell, AFB, AL, Reel # 31811, Frame 1139, and _Contributions of
-Balloon Operations 1947–1958_, 40–45.
-
-[85] Kevin C. Ruffner, ed., _Corona: America’s First Satellite Program_
-(Washington, D.C.: Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central
-Intelligence Agency, 1995), 22.
-
-[86] ibid., 21–22.
-
-[87] Air Force Missile Development Center, “Chronology of Events,”
-Sept. 1, 1957-Aug 10, 1962, Air Force Historical Research Agency,
-Maxwell, AFB, AL, Reel # 31731, Frame 561, and Flight Records of
-Bernard D. Gildenberg, Meteorologist, Holloman AFB Balloon Branch,
-October 12, 1956-March 14, 1961.
-
-[88] Flight Summary, DISCOVERER Balloon Flights, March 31, 1960-April
-22, 1960, Air Force Historical Research Agency, Maxwell, AFB, AL, Reel#
-31811, frame 569.
-
-[89] ibid.
-
-[90] ibid.
-
-[91] Kevin C. Ruffner, ed., _Corona: America’s First Satellite Program_
-(Washington, D.C.: Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central
-Intelligence Agency, 1995), 21–22.
-
-[92] ibid.
-
-[93] ibid.
-
-[94] Martin Marietta Corporation, “Viking '75, Balloon Launched
-Decelerator Test Program Post Flight Report, BLDT Vehicle AV-3,” TR
-3720293, 1972, IV-I and Edward J. Kirschner, _Aerospace Balloons; From
-Montgolfiere to Space_ (Blue Ridge Summit, Pa.: Aero Publishers, 1985),
-64–66.
-
-[95] Martin Marietta Corporation, “Viking '75, Balloon Launched
-Decelerator Test Program Post Flight Report, BLDT Vehicle AV-3,” TR
-3720293, 1972, IV-I.
-
-[96] Kevin D. Randle and Donald R. Schmitt, _The Truth About the UFO
-Crash at Roswell_ (New York: Avon Books, 1994), photograph section.
-
-[97] Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, “Report on Research,
-for the Period July 1965-June 1967”, AFCRL TR-68-0039, November 1967,
-150–151.
-
-[98] Gildenberg.
-
-[99] Database of high altitude balloon operations on file at SAF/AAZD
-compiled from the following sources: Research Division, College of
-Engineering, New York University, _Technical Report No. 93.02, Constant
-Level Balloons_, Section 3, _Summary of Flights_, July 15, 1949;
-“Flight Summary Non-Extensible Balloon Operations 6580th Test Squadron
-(Special), June 1950 to October 1954,” National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.,
-Accession No. 342-62A-181, box 14/18; Flight Records of Bernard D.
-Gildenberg, Meteorologist, Holloman AFB Balloon Branch, October 12,
-1956-March 14, 1961; “Summary of Balloon Flights Launched from Holloman
-AFB, N.M., 1962 thru 1987”, Space and Missile Command, Test and
-Evaluation Unit (SMC/TE, OL-AC) files, Holloman AFB, N.M. Additional
-flight data on file (microfilm), U.S. Air Force Phillips Laboratory,
-Geophysics Directorate, Hanscom AFB, Mass.
-
-[100] Bernard D. Gildenberg, _Meteorological Aspects of Constant-Level
-Balloon Operations in the Southwestern United States_, AFCRL-66-706
-(L.G. Hanscom Field, Bedford, MA: Air Force Cambridge Research
-Laboratories, October 1966), and Bernard D. Gildenberg, _General
-Philosophy and Techniques of Balloon Control_, in Lewis A. Grass, ed.,
-_Proceedings, Sixth AFCRL Scientific Balloon Symposium_, AFCRL-70-0543,
-(L.G. Hanscom Field, Bedford, Mass.: Air Force Cambridge Research
-Laboratories, October 1970).
-
-[101] Blankenship.
-
-[102] ibid.
-
-[103] ibid.
-
-[104] ibid.
-
-[105] ibid.
-
-[106] Joseph Longshore, Balloon Branch Supervisor, telephone interview
-with Capt. James McAndrew, August 16, 1995.
-
-[107] Signed sworn statement of James Ragsdale in Ragsdale Productions
-Inc., _The Jim Ragsdale Story: A Closer Look at the Roswell Incident_
-(Hall Poorbough Press, Inc., 1996), 10–11, and signed sworn statement
-of James Ragsdale in Karl T. Pflock, _Roswell in Perspective_
-(Washington, D.C.: Fund for UFO Research, 1994), 167.
-
-[108] James Ragsdale, interview with Donald R. Schmitt, January 26,
-1993.
-
-[109] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part II_, 17.
-
-[110] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops Part I_, 27–30 and _High
-Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part II_, 6, 10–12, 17.
-
-[111] Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., Col., USAF (Ret), interview with 1st
-Lt. James McAndrew, June 23, 1995.
-
-[112] _Contributions of Balloon Operations to Research and Development
-at the Air Force Missile Development Center, 1947–1958_, 90, and
-_Meteorological Aspects of Constant-Level Balloon Operations in the
-Southwestern United States_, 1.
-
-[113] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops Part I_, 24.
-
-[114] Blankenship and Kittinger.
-
-[115] ibid.
-
-[116] Memorandum, subj: Balloon Tracking and Recovery Equipment, n.d.,
-National Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel
-Records Center, St. Louis, Mo., Accession No. 342-67B-2133, box 65/249,
-file 2, “Biophysics Branch-Escape Section, High Altitude Escape
-Studies, 7218-71719.”
-
-[117] ibid., and Blankenship.
-
-[118] Charles Berlitz and William L. Moore, _The Roswell Incident_ (New
-York: Berkley, 1980), 64, and Don Berliner and Stanton Friedman, _Crash
-at Corona_ (New York: Paragon House, 1992), 88.
-
-[119] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Knight interview.
-
-[120] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Maltais interview.
-
-[121] Charles Berlitz and William L. Moore, _The Roswell Incident_ (New
-York: Berkley, 1980), 64, and Don Berliner and Stanton Friedman, _Crash
-at Corona_ (New York: Paragon House, 1992), 88.
-
-[122] Berliner and Friedman, 89.
-
-[123] Mark Rodeghier and Fred Whiting, _The Plains of San Agustin
-Controversy, July, 1947: Gerald Anderson, Barney Barnett, and the
-Archaeologists_, Introduction (Chicago, IL, Washington, D.C.: J. Allen
-Hynek Center for UFO Studies and The Fund for UFO Research, June 1992),
-2.
-
-[124] ibid.
-
-[125] Kevin D. Randle, Donald R. Schmitt, and Thomas J. Carey, _Gerald
-Anderson and the Plains of San Agustin, in The Plains of San Agustin
-Controversy, July, 1947: Gerald Anderson, Barney Barnett, and the
-Archaeologists_ (Chicago, IL, Washington, D.C.: J. Allen Hynek Center
-for UFO Studies, and The Fund for UFO Research, June 1992), 19.
-
-[126] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[127] Berliner and Friedman, 90.
-
-[128] ibid., 91.
-
-[129] Gerald F. Anderson, interview with Kevin D. Randle, February 4,
-1990, in _The Plains of San Agustin Controversy, July, 1947: Gerald
-Anderson, Barney Barnett, and the Archaeologists_ (Chicago, IL,
-Washington, D.C.: J. Allen Hynek Center for UFO Studies and The Fund
-for UFO Research, June 1992), 59.
-
-[130] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[131] ibid.
-
-[132] ibid.
-
-[133] ibid.
-
-[134] ibid.
-
-[135] Blankenship and Kittinger.
-
-[136] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[137] “Sierra Sam: Scientific Whipping Boy,” _Machine Design_, December
-22, 1960 and “Dummy Takes a Beating for Science’s Sake,” _Aviation
-Week_, January 12, 1953.
-
-[138] Ragsdale.
-
-[139] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[140] Alderson Research Laboratories Inc., “Modular Series
-Anthropomorphic Test Dummies,” Alderson Research Laboratories Inc.,
-June 1955), 5.
-
-[141] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[142] ibid.
-
-[143] Signed, sworn statement of Raymond A. Madson, Lt. Col., USAF
-(Ret).
-
-[144] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[145] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part I_, 22.
-
-[146] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[147] _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part I_, 9, and _High
-Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part II_, 8.
-
-[148] Berliner and Friedman, 91.
-
-[149] ibid., 92–94.
-
-[150] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[151] ibid.
-
-[152] Memorandum, subject: Balloon Tracking and Recovery Equipment,
-n.d., National Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel
-Records Center, St. Louis, Mo., Accession No. 342-67B-2133, box 65/249,
-file 2, “Biophysics Branch-Escape Section, High Altitude Escape
-Studies, 7218-71719,” and _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops, Part I_,
-17, and “Weekly Test Status Report on Project 7218, Manned Balloon
-Flights, (MX-1450B)”, for Week Ending 28 February 1955, National
-Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center,
-St. Louis, Mo., Accession No. 342-66A-181, Box 14/18.
-
-[153] Kittinger and Historical Branch, Office of Information Services,
-Air Research and Development Command, _History of Flight Support
-Holloman Air Development Center 1946–1957_ (Holloman AFB, N.M.:
-Holloman Air Development Center, 1957), 101.
-
-[154] Blankenship.
-
-[155] Berliner and Friedman, 106.
-
-[156] Bernard D. Gildenberg, _Techniques Developed for Heavy Load
-Non-Extensible Balloon Flights_, Report No. HADC-TN-54-3 (Holloman AFB,
-NM: Holloman Air Development Center, March 1954), 7.
-
-[157] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[158] Blankenship and Ole Jorgeson, MSgt., USAF, (Ret), Balloon Branch
-Communications Supervisor, interview with 1st Lt. James McAndrew, May
-28, 1995.
-
-[159] ibid.
-
-[160] Berliner and Friedman, 107.
-
-[161] ibid.
-
-[162] Blankenship.
-
-[163] Berliner and Friedman, 106.
-
-[164] Blankenship.
-
-[165] Signed sworn statement of James Ragsdale in, Ragsdale Productions
-Inc., _The Jim Ragsdale Story: A Closer Look at the Roswell Incident_
-(Hall Poorbough Press, Inc., 1996), 10–11, and signed sworn statement
-of James Ragsdale in Karl T. Pflock, _Roswell in Perspective_
-(Washington, D.C.: Fund for UFO Research, 1994), 167.
-
-[166] Ragsdale.
-
-[167] Frank J. Kaufman, interview with Kevin Randle and Donald Schmitt,
-January 27, 1990.
-
-[168] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[169] Ragsdale.
-
-[170] ibid.
-
-[171] Berliner and Friedman, 92.
-
-[172] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Maltais interview.
-
-[173] ibid., Knight interview.
-
-[174] ibid., Anderson interview.
-
-[175] ibid., Maltais interview.
-
-[176] ibid.
-
-[177] ibid., Anderson interview.
-
-[178] Ragsdale.
-
-[179] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[180] ibid., Maltais interview.
-
-[181] ibid., Anderson interview.
-
-[182] ibid.
-
-[183] ibid., Maltais interview.
-
-[184] ibid., Anderson interview.
-
-[185] Charles Berlitz and William L. Moore, _The Roswell Incident_ (New
-York: Berkley, 1980), 61.
-
-[186] Berliner and Friedman, 92.
-
-[187] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[188] Berliner and Friedman, 91.
-
-[189] ibid.
-
-[190] ibid., 92.
-
-[191] ibid., 91.
-
-[192] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Maltais interview.
-
-[193] Berliner and Friedman, 93.
-
-[194] ibid., 93–94.
-
-[195] ibid., 92.
-
-[196] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[197] Berliner and Friedman, 106.
-
-[198] Ragsdale.
-
-[199] ibid.
-
-[200] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[201] ibid.
-
-[202] Ragsdale.
-
-[203] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[204] ibid.
-
-[205] ibid.
-
-[206] Berliner and Friedman, 106.
-
-[207] Ragsdale.
-
-[208] Berliner and Friedman, 107.
-
-[209] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[210] ibid.
-
-[211] Ragsdale.
-
-[212] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[213] Ragsdale.
-
-[214] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[215] Ragsdale.
-
-[216] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Anderson interview.
-
-[217] ibid.
-
-[218] Berliner and Friedman, 107.
-
-
-
-
- Notes - Section Two
-
-
-[1] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks His
-Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 103.
-
-[2] Don Berliner and Stanton T. Friedman, _Crash at Corona_ (New York:
-Paragon House, 1992), 117, 120, and W. Glenn Dennis, interview with
-Karl T. Pflock, November 2, 1992, 18–19.
-
-[3] Video, _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis
-interview (Washington, D.C.: Fund for UFO Research, 1993) (hereafter
-_Recollections of Roswell, Part II_).
-
-[4] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[5] ibid.
-
-[6] ibid.
-
-[7] ibid.
-
-[8] ibid., and W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Karl T. Pflock, November
-2, 1992, and Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell
-Breaks His Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 103.
-
-[9] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks His
-Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 103.
-
-[10] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[11] ibid.
-
-[12] ibid.
-
-[13] Don Berliner and Stanton T. Friedman, _Crash at Corona_ (New York:
-Paragon House, 1992), 120, and W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Karl T.
-Pflock, November 2, 1992.
-
-[14] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks His
-Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 103.
-
-[15] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[16] Don Berliner and Stanton T. Friedman, _Crash at Corona_ (New York:
-Paragon House, 1992), 117.
-
-[17] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[18] ibid.
-
-[19] ibid.
-
-[20] ibid.
-
-[21] W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Stanton T. Friedman, August 5,
-1989.
-
-[22] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[23] W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Karl T. Pflock, November 2, 1992.
-
-[24] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[25] W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Karl T. Pflock, November 2, 1992.
-
-[26] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[27] ibid.
-
-[28] ibid.
-
-[29] Don Berliner and Stanton T. Friedman, _Crash at Corona_ (New York:
-Paragon House, 1992), 119, and Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The
-Mortician of Roswell Breaks His Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995,
-105.
-
-[30] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[31] ibid.
-
-[32] W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Karl T. Pflock, November 2, 1992.
-
-[33] ibid.
-
-[34] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks
-His Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 105, and W. Glenn Dennis,
-interview with Karl T. Pflock, November 2, 1992.
-
-[35] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks His
-Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 105.
-
-[36] W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Stanton T. Friedman, August 5,
-1989.
-
-[37] ibid.
-
-[38] Don Berliner and Stanton T. Friedman, _Crash at Corona_ (New York:
-Paragon House, 1992), 119.
-
-[39] Headquarters United States Air Force, _The Roswell Report:
-Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert_ (Washington, D.C.: U.S.
-Government Printing Office, 1995), Attachment 32, “Synopsis of Balloon
-Research Findings by 1st Lt. James McAndrew”.
-
-[40] 427th AAFBU Sq “M” Morning Reports, July 8–9, 1947, National
-Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center,
-St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[41] Personnel record of 1st Lt. Angele A. (LaRue) Thessing, National
-Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center,
-St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[42] ibid.
-
-[43] Personnel records of Capt. Joyce Goddard, 1st Lt. Rosemary J.
-Brown, 1st Lt. Eileen M. Fanton, 1st Lt. Angele A. LaRue, 1st Lt.
-Claudia Uebele, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[44] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks
-His Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 132, and W. Glenn Dennis,
-interview with Stanton T. Friedman, August 5, 1989.
-
-[45] Paul McCarthy, “The Case of the Vanishing Nurses,” _Omni_, Fall
-1995, 107–114.
-
-[46] WD AGO FORM 66, “Officer’s Qualification Record,” Personnel
-Record of Capt. Eileen M. Fanton, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[47] DD Form 214, “Armed Forces of the United States Report of
-Transfer or Discharge”, April 30, 1958, Personnel file of Capt. Eileen
-M. Fanton, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[48] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks His
-Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 132.
-
-[49] WD AGO FORM 66, “Officer’s Qualification Record,” and WD AGO FORM
-66-3, “AAF Medical Dep’t Officer’s Qualification Record,” Personnel
-Record of Capt. Eileen M. Fanton, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[50] W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Karl T. Pflock, November 2, 1992.
-
-[51] WD AGO FORM 66-3, “AAF Medical Dep’t Officer’s Qualification
-Record,” Personnel Record of Capt. Eileen M. Fanton, National Archives
-and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St.
-Louis, Mo.
-
-[52] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks His
-Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 104 and W. Glenn Dennis, interview
-with Karl T. Pflock, November 2, 1992, 11, 15.
-
-[53] WD AGO FORM 66, “Officer’s Qualification Record,” Personnel
-Record of Capt. Eileen M. Fanton, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[54] ibid.
-
-[55] WD MD FORM 55A, “Clinical Record Brief,” September 5, 1947, and WD
-AGO FORM 8-38, “Special Examination or Additional Data,” September 11,
-1947, Personnel Record of Capt. Eileen M. Fanton, National Archives and
-Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis,
-Mo.
-
-[56] ibid, and Physical Examination Board Proceedings, Capt. Eileen M.
-Fanton, August 24, 1955, Personnel Record of Capt. Eileen M. Fanton,
-National Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel
-Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[57] W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Stanton T. Friedman, August 5,
-1989, and W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Karl T. Pflock, November 2,
-1992.
-
-[58] W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Stanton T. Friedman, August 5,
-1989.
-
-[59] ibid.
-
-[60] Roster of Officers, 6th Bomb Wing, Walker AFB, N.M., December
-30, 1952, “History of the 6th Bomb Wing, December 1952,” Air Force
-Historical Research Center, Maxwell AFB, AL.
-
-[61] ibid.
-
-[62] Dr. Frank B. Nordstrom, interview with Capt. James McAndrew, April
-25, 1996, and Dr. Frank B. Nordstrom, Signed Sworn Statement, April 25,
-1996.
-
-[63] Charles E. Clouthier, Signed Sworn Statement, April 26, 1996.
-
-[64] ibid.
-
-[65] J.P. Cahn, “Flying Saucers and the Mysterious Little Green Men,”
-_True_ 31, No. 184, (September 1952), 19.
-
-[66] ibid., 103.
-
-[67] ibid., 19.
-
-[68] J.P. Cahn, “Flying Saucer Swindlers,” _True_ 36, No. 231, (August
-1956), 36.
-
-[69] ibid., 36.
-
-[70] J.P. Cahn, “Flying Saucers and the Mysterious Little Green Men,”
-_True_ 31, No. 184, (September 1952), 110.
-
-[71] ibid.
-
-[72] “4 Rank Titles Change,” _Air Force Times_, March 29, 1952, 1, 22.
-
-[73] Alan L. Gropman, _The Air Force Integrates, 1945–1964_
-(Washington, D.C.: Office of Air Force History, 1985), 243.
-
-[74] Don Berliner and Stanton T. Friedman, _Crash at Corona_ (New York:
-Paragon House, 1992), 117.
-
-[75] WD AGO FORM 66, “Officer’s Qualification Record,” and AF FORM 11,
-“Officer Military Record,” Personnel Record of Col. Lee F. Ferrell,
-National Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel
-Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[76] ibid.
-
-[77] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks
-His Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 105, and W. Glenn Dennis,
-interview with Karl T. Pflock, November 2, 1992.
-
-[78] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks His
-Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 105.
-
-[79] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks
-His Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 105, and W. Glenn Dennis,
-interview with Karl T. Pflock, November 2, 1992.
-
-[80] W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Karl T. Pflock, November 2, 1992.
-
-[81] ibid.
-
-[82] ibid.
-
-[83] 427th AAFBU Sq. “M” Morning Reports, July 1–31, 1947, National
-Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center,
-St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[84] WD AGO FORM 1, “Morning Report,” 427th AAFBU Sq. “M,” April
-1, 1947 through October 1, 1947, and WD AGO FORM 66, “Officer’s
-Qualification Record,” Personnel Record of Capt. Joyce Goddard,
-National Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel
-Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[85] WD AGO FORM 66, “Officer’s Qualification Record,” Personnel Record
-of Capt. Joyce Goddard, National Archives and Records Administration,
-National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[86] WD AGO FORM 1, “Morning Report,” 427th AAFBU, Sq. “M,” August 7,
-1947, National Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel
-Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[87] ibid., and WD AGO FORM 66, “Officer’s Qualification Record,”
-Personnel Record of Capt. Lucille C. Slattery, National Archives and
-Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis,
-Mo.
-
-[88] Ethel Kovatch-Scott, Col., USAF (Ret), telephone interview with
-Capt. James McAndrew, May 5, 1995 and July 3, 1996, and Mary Hoadley,
-Lt. Col., USAF (Ret), telephone interview with 1st Lt. James McAndrew,
-May 5, 1995, and Mary L. Wiggins, Maj., USAF (Ret), telephone interview
-with 1st Lt. James McAndrew, May 5, 1995.
-
-[89] ibid.
-
-[90] WD AGO FORM 66, “Officer’s Qualification Record,” Personnel
-Record of Capt. Lucille C. Slattery, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[91] WD AGO FORM 1, “Morning Report,” 427th AAFBU, Sq. “M,” 509th
-Station Medical Group, 509th Medical Group, 509th Medical Squadron,
-January 1947 through February 1952, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-and Rosters of Officers, 509th Bomb Wing- February 1952 through July
-1958, 6th Bomb Wing- February 1952 through March 1967, and AF FORM 11,
-“Officer Military Record,” Personnel Record of Maj. Idabelle M. Wilson,
-National Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel
-Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[92] AF FORM 11, “Officer Military Record,” Personnel Record of Maj.
-Idabelle M. Wilson, National Archives and Records Administration,
-National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[93] ibid.
-
-[94] Idabelle M. Wilson, Maj., USAF, (Ret), telephone interview with
-1st Lt. James McAndrew, April 28, 1995.
-
-[95] ibid.
-
-[96] Memo: Jack A. Comstock, Maj. (MC), Surgeon, 509th Station Medical
-Group, to Major Robert W. Schick, Investigating Officer, Headquarters,
-USAF, subj: Investigation of B-29 Crash, 18 August 1948, Aircraft
-Accident No. 48-8-12, Aircraft #44-86383, Air Force Historical Research
-Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL. and WD AGO Form 8-33, “Clinical Record Brief,”
-12 August 1948, Personnel records of Air Force members, service
-numbers AF 18041408 and AF 16191866, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[97] ibid.
-
-[98] ibid.
-
-[99] WD AGO Form 8-33, “Clinical Record Brief,” 16 May 1949, Personnel
-records of Air Force members, service numbers AO 827137 and AF
-42050093, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[100] WD AGO Form 5-4, “Individual Crash Fire Report,” 20 May 1949,
-Aircraft Accident No. 49-5-16, Aircraft #43-48401, Air Force Historical
-Research Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL.
-
-[101] WD AGO Form 8-33, “Clinical Record Brief,” 16 May 1949,
-Personnel records of Air Force members, service numbers AO 827137 and
-AF 42050093, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[102] WD AGO Form 5-4, “Individual Crash Fire Report,” 19 December
-1949, Aircraft Accident No. 49-12-15-2, Air Force Historical Research
-Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL.
-
-[103] WD AGO Form 8-33, “Clinical Record Brief,” 19 December 1949,
-and “Autopsy Report,” Personnel records of Air Force members, service
-numbers 17343A, AF 11101085, and 15239923, National Archives and
-Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis,
-Mo.
-
-[104] ibid.
-
-[105] WD AGO Form 8-33, “Clinical Record Brief,” 1 June 1950,
-Personnel records of Air Force members, service numbers AO 685565 and
-AF 32668639, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[106] ibid.
-
-[107] ibid.
-
-[108] Standard form 503, “Autopsy Protocol,” June 16, 1955 of Air Force
-members, service numbers AO 3006516 and AO 3004607, Aircraft Accident
-No. 55-6-16-6, Air Force Historical Research Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL.
-
-[109] DD Form 481-3, “Clinical Record Cover Sheet,” June 16, 1955,
-Personnel Records of Air Force members, service numbers AO 3006516 and
-AO 3004607, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[110] Standard form 503, “Autopsy Protocol,” June 16, 1955, of Air
-Force members, service numbers AO 3006516 and AO 3004607, Aircraft
-Accident No. 55-6-16-6, Air Force Historical Research Agency, Maxwell
-AFB, AL.
-
-[111] Air Force Form 14b, “Medical Report of an Individual Involved in
-AF Aircraft Accident,” 3 October 1955, Aircraft Accident No. 55-10-3-6,
-Air Force Historical Research Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL.
-
-[112] Official Trip Report Walker AFB, N.M. October 4, thru October
-7, 1955, George Schwaderer, Identification Specialist to MCTSG,
-October 12, 1955, Accession No. 342-65A-6025, Box 25/28, folder Trip
-Rpts., Search & Ident: Mar 56 to Dec 56. Trip #198 to 234, National
-Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel Records
-Center, St. Louis, Mo., and AF Form 715, “Preparation Room History,”
-4 October 1955, Personnel Record of Air Force member, service number
-1521B/2009467, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[113] Air Force Form 14b, “Medical Report of an Individual Involved in
-AF Aircraft Accident,” 3 October 1955, Aircraft Accident No. 55-10-3-6,
-Air Force Historical Research Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL.
-
-[114] Standard form 503, “Autopsy Protocol,” June 27, 1956, Personnel
-Record of Air Force members, service numbers AO 2223861 and AF
-37578524, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[115] Official Trip Report Walker AFB, N.M. 27 June through 30 June
-1956, George Schwaderer, Identification Specialist to Thomas W. Toy,
-Chief Memorial Affairs Branch, Air Force Services Division, Accession
-No. 342-65A-6025, Box 25/28, folder Trip Rpts., Search & Ident:
-Mar 56 to Dec 56. Trip #198 to 234, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[116] Standard form 503, “Autopsy Protocol,” June 27, 1956, Personnel
-Record of Air Force members, service numbers AO 2223861 and AF
-37578524, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo., and Air Force Form 14b,
-“Medical Report of an Individual Involved in AF Aircraft Accident,”
-June 26, 1956, Headquarters Air Force Safety Agency, Kirtland AFB, N.M.
-
-[117] AF Form 697, “Identification Findings and Conclusions,” 3 Feb
-1960, Personnel Records of Air Force members, service numbers AO 794152
-and 1046844, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[118] ibid.
-
-[119] ibid.
-
-[120] Charles A. Ravenstein, _Air Force Combat Wings; Lineage and
-Honors Histories, 1947–1977_ (Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing
-Office, 1984), 16, 275–276.
-
-[121] Air Force Form 14, “Report of Air Force Aircraft Accident,” June
-26, 1956, Headquarters Air Force Safety Agency, Kirtland AFB, N.M.
-
-[122] ibid.
-
-[123] ibid.
-
-[124] ibid.
-
-[125] ibid.
-
-[126] Official Trip Report Walker AFB, N.M. 27 June through 30 June
-1956, George Schwaderer, Identification Specialist to Thomas W. Toy,
-Chief Memorial Affairs Branch, Air Force Services Division, Accession
-No. 342-65A-6025, Box 25/28, folder Trip Rpts., Search & Ident:
-Mar 56 to Dec 56. Trip #198 to 234, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[127] ibid.
-
-[128] Jack L. Whenry, Maj., USAF, (Ret), telephone interview with 1st
-Lt. James McAndrew, January 26, 1995, and John C. Walter, MSgt., USAF
-(Ret), telephone interview with Capt. James McAndrew, June 29, 1995 and
-July 12, 1996.
-
-[129] ibid.
-
-[130] Official Trip Report Walker AFB, N.M. 27 June through 30 June
-1956, George Schwaderer, Identification Specialist to Thomas W. Toy,
-Chief Memorial Affairs Branch, Air Force Services Division, Accession
-No. 342-65A-6025, Box 25/28, folder Trip Rpts., Search & Ident:
-Mar 56 to Dec 56. Trip #198 to 234, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[131] ibid.
-
-[132] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview,
-and Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks His
-Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 104.
-
-[133] DD Form 481-3, “Clinical Record Cover Sheet,” June 26, 1956,
-Personnel Record of AF 37578524, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[134] Whenry, Walters, and Air Force Manual 143-1, 1 November 1953,
-“Mortuary Affairs,” 28, Record Group 341, Entry 36, Box 13, Microfilm
-Reel 167, National Archives and Record Administration, College Park, Md.
-
-[135] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[136] Standard form 503, “Autopsy Protocol,” June 27, 1956, Personnel
-Record of Air Force members, service numbers AO 2223861 and AF
-37578524, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[137] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[138] Standard form 503, “Autopsy Protocol,” June 27, 1956, Personnel
-Record of Air Force member, service number AF 37578524, National
-Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center,
-St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[139] ibid.
-
-[140] ibid.
-
-[141] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[142] Standard form 503, “Autopsy Protocol,” June 27, 1956, Personnel
-Record of Air Force members, service numbers AO 2223861 and AF
-37578524, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo., and Air Force Form 14b,
-“Medical Report of an Individual Involved in AF Aircraft Accident,”
-June 26, 1956, Headquarters Air Force Safety Agency, Kirtland AFB, N.M.
-
-[143] DD Form 481-3, “Clinical Record Cover Sheet,” June 26, 1956,
-Personnel Record of Air Force members, service numbers AO 2223861 and
-AF 37578524, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[144] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks
-His Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 108.
-
-[145] Official Trip Report Walker AFB, N.M. October 4, thru October 7,
-1955, George Schwaderer, Identification Specialist to MCTSG, October
-12, 1955, Accession No. 342-65A-6025, Box 25/28, folder Trip Rpts.,
-Search & Ident: Mar 56 to Dec 56. Trip #198 to 234, National Archives
-and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St.
-Louis, Mo., and AF Form 697, “Identification Findings and Conclusions,”
-3 Feb 1960, Personnel Records of Air Force members, service numbers
-AO 794152 and 1046844, National Archives and Records Administration,
-National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[146] Air Force Manual 143-1, 1 November 1953, “Mortuary Affairs,”
-28–29, Accession No. 341, Entry 36, Box 13, Microfilm Reel 167,
-National Archives and Record Administration, College Park, Md.
-
-[147] Official Trip Report—Walker AFB, N.M. 27 June through 30 June
-1956, George J. Schwaderer, Identification Specialist, to Thomas
-W. Toy, Chief Memorial Affairs Branch, July 5, 1956, Accession No.
-342-65A-6025, Box 25/28, folder Trip Rpts., Search & Ident: Mar 56 to
-Dec 56. Trip #198 to 234, National Archives and Records Administration,
-National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo., and Jack L. Whenry,
-Maj., USAF, (Ret), telephone interview with 1st Lt. James McAndrew,
-January 26, 1995, and John C. Walter, MSgt., USAF (Ret), telephone
-interview with Capt. James McAndrew, June 29, 1995 and July 12, 1996.
-
-[148] Walter and Whenry.
-
-[149] ibid.
-
-[150] WD AGO FORM 66, “Officer’s Qualification Record,” and AF FORM 11,
-“Officer Military Record,” Personnel Record of Col. Lee F. Ferrell,
-National Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel
-Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[151] “Air Force Care of Deceased Personnel (1951–1959), Volume
-1: Text”, Historical Study No. 236, Call No. K 201-326, Air Force
-Historical Research Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL.
-
-[152] Air Force Manual 143-1, 1 November 1953, “Mortuary Affairs,”
-27, Accession No. 341, Entry 36, Box 13, Microfilm Reel 167, National
-Archives and Record Administration, College Park, Md.
-
-[153] Official Trip Report Walker AFB, N.M. 27 June through 30 June
-1956, George Schwaderer, Identification Specialist to Thomas W. Toy,
-Chief Memorial Affairs Branch, Air Force Services Division, July 5,
-1956 and Official Trip Report Walker AFB, N.M. October 4, thru October
-7, 1955, George Schwaderer, Identification Specialist to MCTSG, October
-12, 1955, Accession No. 342-65A-6025, Box 25/28, folder Trip Rpts.,
-Search & Ident: Mar 56 to Dec 56. Trip #198 to 234, National Archives
-and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St.
-Louis, Mo.
-
-[154] Official Trip Report Walker AFB, N.M. 27 June through 30 June
-1956, George Schwaderer, Identification Specialist to Thomas W. Toy,
-Chief Memorial Affairs Branch, Air Force Services Division, July 5,
-1956, Accession No. 342-65A-6025, Box 25/28, folder Trip Rpts., Search
-& Ident: Mar 56 to Dec 56. Trip #198 to 234, National Archives and
-Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis,
-Mo.
-
-[155] George J. Schwaderer, telephone interview with Capt. James
-McAndrew, June 28, 1996.
-
-[156] ibid.
-
-[157] Air Force Manual 143-1, 1 November 1953, “Mortuary Affairs,”
-27, Accession No. 341, Entry 36, Box 13, Microfilm Reel 167, National
-Archives and Record Administration, College Park, Md.
-
-[158] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks
-His Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 104.
-
-[159] Memo, Charles J. Stahl, M.D., Armed Forces Medical Examiner,
-to Capt. James McAndrew, SAF/AAZD, subj: Request for Information on
-Aircraft Crash Fatalities, October 13, 1995.
-
-[160] Unit history, 4036 USAF Hospital, Walker AFB, N.M., June 1956, 6,
-Air Force Historical Research Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL.
-
-[161] ibid.
-
-[162] Standard form 503, “Autopsy Protocol,” June 27, 1956, Personnel
-Record of of Air Force members, service numbers AO 2223861 and AF
-37578524, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[163] Air Force Missile Development Center, _MAN-HIGH I_, MDC-TR-59-24,
-1959, and Lt. Col. David G. Simons, _MAN HIGH II_, Air Force Missile
-Development Center, Holloman AFB, N.M., AFMDC-TR-59-28, June 1959, 1,
-and Air Force Missile Development Center, _MAN HIGH III_, MDC-TR-60-16,
-1961.
-
-[164] Historical Branch, Office of Information Services, Air Force
-Missile Development Center, Air Research and Development Command,
-Holloman AFB, N.M., _Contributions of Balloon Operations to Research
-and Development at the Air Force Missile Development Center Holloman
-Air Force Base, N. Mex. 1947–1958_ (hereafter _Contributions of Balloon
-Operations 1947–1958_), 11.
-
-[165] ibid., and Air Force Missile Development Center FORM 597,
-Schedule Request- Project 7222/4.2- “Manned Gondola Flight,” May 19,
-20, 22, 1959, Accession No. 342-65B-3185, Box 4/22, National Archives
-and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St.
-Louis, Mo.
-
-[166] DD FORM 481-3, “Clinical Record Cover Sheet,” May 21, 1959,
-Personnel Record of Capt. Dan D. Fulgham, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.,
-and Air Force Missile Development Center FORM 597, Schedule Request-
-Project 7222/4.2- “Manned Gondola Flight,” May 20, 1959, Accession No.
-342-65B-3185, Box 4/22, National Archives and Records Administration,
-National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[167] DD Form 613, R&D Progress Card, Project 7164, “Physiology of
-Flight,” Task 71840, “Life Supporting Systems for Advanced Vehicles,”
-February 24, 1959, 30–31, National Archives and Record Administration
-Accession No. 342-75-095, Box 93/100, folder 1, and Technical “R&D”
-Record Book, Aeromedical Laboratory, Physiology Branch, “Life Support
-System for Orbital Flight,” Project 7164, Task 71840, 13–16, National
-Archives and Record Administration, National Personnel Records Center,
-St. Louis, Mo. Accession No. 342-75-095, Box 93/100, folder 2.
-
-[168] Air Force Form 77, “USAF Officer Effectiveness Report, 1 Feb
-58 to 31 Jan 59, Personnel Record of Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.,
-National Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel
-Records Center, St. Louis, Mo., and Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.,
-_The Long, Lonely Leap_, (New York: E.P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1961) 131.
-
-[169] Air Force Missile Development Center, _Man-High I_, MDC-TR-59-24,
-1959.
-
-[170] Schedule Request- Project 7222/4.2- “Manned Gondola Flight,”
-May 19, 20, 22, 1959, Accession No. 342-65B-3185, Box 4/22, National
-Archives and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center,
-St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[171] ibid.
-
-[172] Ole Jorgeson, MSgt., USAF, (Ret), interview with 1st Lt. James
-McAndrew, May 28, 1995.
-
-[173] Air Force Missile Development Center FORM 597, Schedule
-Request- Project 7222/4.2- “Manned Gondola Flight,” May 19, 1959,
-Accession No. 342-65B-3185, Box 4/22, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[174] Air Force Missile Development Center FORM 597, Schedule
-Request- Project 7222/4.2- “Manned Gondola Flight,” May 20, 1959,
-Accession No. 342-65B-3185, Box 4/22.
-
-[175] ibid.
-
-[176] ibid.
-
-[177] ibid., and Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., Col., USAF (Ret), interview
-with 1st Lt. James McAndrew, June 23, 1995.
-
-[178] Kittinger.
-
-[179] ibid.
-
-[180] ibid.
-
-[181] Dan D. Fulgham, Col., USAF, (Ret), interview with 1st Lt. James
-McAndrew, May 26, 1995.
-
-[182] ibid. and Standard Form 539, “Abbreviated Clinical Record,” May
-21, 1959, Personnel Record of Col. Dan D. Fulgham, National Archives
-and Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St.
-Louis, Mo.
-
-[183] ibid.
-
-[184] Jorgeson and Roland H. Lutz, CMSgt., USAF (Ret), interview with
-1st Lt. James McAndrew, May 31, 1995.
-
-[185] ibid.
-
-[186] Fulgham and William C. Kaufman, Lt. Col., USAF, (Ret), interview
-with 1st Lt. James McAndrew, May 24, 1995.
-
-[187] ibid.
-
-[188] Jorgeson.
-
-[189] Kaufman.
-
-[190] Signed, sworn statement of Dan D. Fulgham, Col., USAF, (Ret), May
-25, 1995.
-
-[191] Kittinger.
-
-[192] ibid.
-
-[193] Video, _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, Gerald Anderson
-interview, (Washington, D.C.: Fund for UFO Research, 1993).
-
-[194] Kittinger and Air Force Form 77, “USAF Officer Effectiveness
-Report,” 1 Feb 58 to 31 Jan 59, Personnel Record of Col. Joseph W.
-Kittinger, Jr., National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[195] Kittinger.
-
-[196] ibid., and Kaufman.
-
-[197] Kittinger.
-
-[198] ibid.
-
-[199] ibid.
-
-[200] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[201] Signed, sworn statements of Charles A. Coltman, Col. (MC), USAF,
-(Ret), Dan D. Fulgham, Col., USAF, (Ret), Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.,
-Col., USAF, (Ret), Roland H. Lutz, CMSgt., USAF, (Ret), Ole Jorgeson,
-MSgt., USAF, (Ret), and statement of William C. Kaufman, Lt. Col.,
-USAF, (Ret).
-
-[202] Kittinger.
-
-[203] Capt. Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., _The Long, Lonely Leap_, (New
-York: E.P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1961) 130.
-
-[204] Kittinger.
-
-[205] Signed, sworn statements of Charles A. Coltman, Col. (MC), USAF,
-(Ret), Dan D. Fulgham, Col., USAF, (Ret), Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr.,
-Col., USAF, (Ret), Roland H. Lutz, CMSgt., USAF, (Ret), Ole Jorgeson,
-MSgt., USAF, (Ret), and statement of William C. Kaufman, Lt. Col.,
-USAF, (Ret).
-
-[206] Craig D. Ryan, _The Pre-Astronauts_, (Annapolis: Naval Institute
-Press, 1995), 200.
-
-[207] Air Force Missile Development Center FORM 597, Schedule
-Request- Project 7222/4.2- “Manned Gondola Flight,” May 19, 1959,
-Accession No. 342-65B-3185, Box 4/22, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo., and
-Memo: Maj. Lawrence M. Bogard, Chief, Balloon Branch, to MDWXB, subj:
-Project 7222, 8 May 1959.
-
-[208] ibid., and Jorgeson.
-
-[209] Jorgeson.
-
-[210] ibid.
-
-[211] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[212] ibid.
-
-[213] ibid.
-
-[214] Karl T. Pflock, “Star Witness: The Mortician of Roswell Breaks
-His Code of Silence,” _Omni_, Fall 1995, 103.
-
-[215] _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, W. Glenn Dennis interview.
-
-[216] Jorgeson.
-
-[217] Unit History, 47th Air Division, June 1954, photo section, Air
-Force Historical Research Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL.
-
-[218] Unit History, 6th Bomb Wing, June 1959, Annex “N,” “Base Support
-Plan, Medical,” June 1, 1959.
-
-[219] Charles A. Ravenstein, _Air Force Combat Wings; Lineage and
-Honors Histories, 1947–1977_ (Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing
-Office, 1984), 16.
-
-[220] Kaufman.
-
-[221] ibid.
-
-[222] Roland H. Lutz, CMSgt., USAF, (Ret), interview with 1st Lt. James
-McAndrew, May 31, 1995.
-
-[223] Fulgham.
-
-[224] Kittinger.
-
-[225] ibid.
-
-[226] ibid.
-
-[227] ibid., and ltr., Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Director, Dearborn
-Observatory, Northwestern University, to Maj. Hector Quintanilla, Chief
-Aerial Phenomena Branch, December 6, 1965, National Air Intelligence
-Center historical files, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.
-
-[228] Kevin D. Randle and Donald R. Schmitt, _The Truth About the UFO
-Crash at Roswell_ (New York: Avon Books, 1994), 22.
-
-[229] Standard Form 539, “Abbreviated Clinical Record,” May 21, 1959,
-Personnel Record of Col. Dan D. Fulgham, National Archives and Records
-Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[230] Fulgham.
-
-[231] Kittinger.
-
-[232] ibid.
-
-[233] Kaufman.
-
-[234] DD Form 640, “Nursing Notes,” May 24, 1959, and DD Form 728,
-“Doctor’s Orders,” May 22, 1959, Personnel Record of Col. Dan D.
-Fulgham, National Archives and Records Administration, National
-Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Mo.
-
-[235] Kittinger, Kaufman, and DD Form 728 “Doctor’s Orders,” May 22,
-1959, Personnel Record of Col. Dan D. Fulgham, National Archives and
-Records Administration, National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis,
-Mo.
-
-[236] ibid.
-
-[237] Kittinger.
-
-[238] ibid.
-
-[239] Fulgham.
-
-
-
-
- Appendix A
-
- [Illustration: Anthropomorphic Dummy Launch and Landing Locations
-
- Source: Test records of U.S. Air Force aeromedical project no.
- 7218, task 71719 (HIGH DIVE) and project no. 7222, task 71748
- (EXCELSIOR).]
-
-
- High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Number Date Launch Site Landing Site
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- 1 6/23/54 Holloman AFB, N.M. Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 2 6/28/54 Holloman AFB, N.M. Dunkin, N.M.
-
- 3 6/30/54 Holloman AFB, N.M. 10 miles Southwest of
- Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 4 12/1/54 Holloman AFB, N.M. Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 5 12/2/54 Holloman AFB, N.M. 12 miles South of Artesia, N.M.
-
- 6 12/6/54 Holloman AFB, N.M. Near Twin Buttes, N.M.
-
- 7 12/9/54 Holloman AFB, N.M. 3 miles West of Twin
- Buttes, N.M.
-
- 8 2/23/55 Holloman AFB, N.M. 28 miles East of Roswell, N.M.
-
- 9 3/1/55 Holloman AFB, N.M. 25 miles South of Caprock, N.M.
-
- 10 3/3/55 Holloman AFB, N.M. 25 miles East/Northeast of
- Roswell, N.M.
-
- 11 6/15/55 Holloman AFB, N.M. 5 miles Northwest of
- Dunkin, N.M.
-
- 12 6/23/55 Holloman AFB, N.M. 35 miles Southwest of
- Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 13 6/29/55 Holloman AFB, N.M. 25 miles West of Three
- Rivers, N.M.
-
- 14 7/7/55 Holloman AFB, N.M. 13 miles West of Tularosa
- Peak, N.M.
-
- 15 7/15/55 Holloman AFB, N.M. 15 miles Northeast of
- Hatch, N.M.
-
- 16 11/17/55 Holloman AFB, N.M. 8 miles Northwest
- of Roswell, N.M.
-
- 17 11/21/55 Holloman AFB, N.M. Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 18 1/25/56 Holloman AFB, N.M. Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 19 2/8/56 Holloman AFB, N.M. 20 miles South of
- Roswell, N.M.
-
- 20 2/21/56 Holloman AFB, N.M. 20 miles East of Dunkin, N.M.
-
- 21 2/21/56 Holloman AFB, N.M. Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 22 5/18/56 Holloman AFB, N.M. Data Not Available
-
- 23 5/22/56 Holloman AFB, N.M. Data Not Available
-
- 24 8/21/56 Holloman AFB, N.M. Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 25 5/16/57 Truth or White Sands Proving
-
- Consequences, N.M. Ground, N.M.
-
- 26 5/29/57 Hatch, N.M. 25 miles Northwest of
- Las Cruces, N.M.
-
- 27 6/4/57 Holloman AFB, N.M. 11 miles North of
- Las Cruces, N.M.
-
- 28 6/6/57 Holloman AFB, N.M. 17 miles South of
- Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 29 6/7/57 Holloman AFB, N.M. Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 30 6/11/57 Hatch, N.M. West of San Agustin Pass, N.M.
-
- 31 6/13/57 Holloman AFB, N.M. Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 32 9/27/57 White Sands Natl
- Monument
- Picnic Area Orogrande, N.M.
-
- 33 10/8/57 White Sands Proving 10 miles East of Picacho, N.M.
- Ground
-
- 34 1/29/58 Data Not Available 20 miles South of
- Alamogordo, N.M.
-
- 35 1/9/59 Holloman AFB, N.M. White Sands Proving
- Ground, N.M.
-
- 36 1/14/59 Las Palomas, N.M. 30 miles East/Southeast of
- Roswell, N.M.
-
- 37 1/30/59 Nutt, N.M. White Sands Proving
- Ground, N.M.
-
- 38 2/4/59 Holloman AFB, N.M. 1 mile North of Bent, N.M.
-
- 39 2/6/59 Lake Valley, N.M. Data Not Available
-
- 40 2/10/59 Caballo Dam, N.M. White Sands Proving
- Ground, N.M.
-
- 41 2/11/59 Hatch, N.M. Data Not Available
-
- 42 2/14/59 Data Not Available 30 miles West of
- Holloman AFB, N.M.
-
- 43 2/16/59 Ft. Craig, N.M. Mescalero Apache Reservation
- (N.M.)
-
-
-
-
- Appendix B
-
-
- STATEMENT OF WITNESS
-
- Date: 26 April 1996 Place: Farmington, NM
-
- I Charles E. Clouthier, hereby state that James McAndrew, was
- identified as a Captain, USAFR on this date at my place of
- employment do hereby, voluntarily and of my own free will, make the
- following statement. This was done without having been subjected to
- any coercion, unlawful influence or unlawful inducement.
-
- I was on active duty in the US Air Force and stationed at Walker
- AFB, Roswell, NM, from February 1955 until October 1956. During that
- time I was a pharmacist assigned to the base hospital. Following
- my tour of duty with the Air Force, I returned to my hometown,
- Farmington, NM, where I became an employee and eventually a
- co-owner of Farmington Drug.
-
- With the exception of the two years in the US Air Force, I have
- been a resident of Farmington, NM since 1934. It is my recollection
- that Dr Frank B. Nordstrom was the first pediatrician to practice
- in the Farmington area and he remained the only pediatrician in
- Farmington until approximately 1970. I base these recollections on
- extensive professional and personal contacts with physicians in the
- Farmington area and as a father of two children who were patients
- of Dr Nordstrom’s.
-
- Also based on nearly 40 years of contact with physicians in the
- Farmington area, I believe that Dr Nordstrom is the only physician
- who served a tour of duty at Walker AFB. During the 1960s, I
- became aware that Dr Nordstrom had also served at the Walker AFB
- hospital. At various times in the ensuing years. Dr Nordstrom
- and I reminisced about our service at Walker AFB. During these
- conversations Dr Nordstrom never mentioned any activities during
- his tour of duty I considered unusual or that might explain reports
- of bodies or aliens. During the time I was stationed at Walker AFB,
- I did not witness, nor did I hear rumors, of anything that involved
- flying saucers, aliens, or anything else of an extraterrestrial
- nature.
-
- I am not part of a conspiracy to withhold information from either
- the US government or the American public. There is no classified
- information that I am withholding related to this inquiry, and I
- have not been threatened by US government persons concerning not
- talking about this matter.
-
- SIGNED: Subscribed and sworn before a
- person authorized to administer oaths
- this 26th day of April 1996 at
- Farmington, NM
-
- [Signature] [Signature]
- Charles E. Clouthier James McAndrew, Capt, USAFR
-
- WITNESS:
- [Signature]
-
-
- STATEMENT OF WITNESS
-
- Place Date: 25 May 95
-
- I, Charles A. Coltman, Jr., Col, USAF, MC (Ret), hereby state that
- James McAndrew was identified as a Lieutenant, USAFR, on this date
- at my place of employment and do hereby, voluntarily and of my own
- free will, make the following statement. This was done without
- having been subjected to any coercion, unlawful influence or
- unlawful inducement.
-
- I entered the U.S. Air Force in 1957 as a flight surgeon and was
- assigned to Walker AFB, NM, in 1958. Following a residency at Ohio
- State University from 1959 to 1963, I was assigned to Wilford Hall
- USAF Medical Center, Lackland AFB, TX, where I eventually became
- the Chairman of the Department of Medicine. I retired from the Air
- Force in 1977. I am presently a Professor at The University of
- Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and Chief Executive
- Officer of the Cancer Therapy and Research Foundation of South
- Texas.
-
- I remember a balloon crash that happened north of Roswell, NM, in
- May, 1959. I received a phone call from the NCOIC of the Flight
- Surgeon’s office, who informed me of the crash. The NCOIC, Earl
- Wormwood, came to my quarters and we drove, in an old blue Air
- Force “crackerbox” ambulance, to the crash site. I remember the
- gondola laying on its side and the deflated balloon on the ground.
- The crew members were sitting next to the gondola. I examined the
- pilots and determined they were not seriously injured. They told me
- they were practicing touch-and-go’s and a gust of wind had dumped
- them on the ground, and the gondola had struck one of the pilots
- in the head. Also present were Air Force technicians in trucks who
- tracked the balloon. The injured pilots were transported to the
- Flight Surgeon’s office at the hospital at Walker AFB.
-
- The injury sustained by the crew member was a head
- abrasion/contusion and a hemotoma. The hemotoma caused the
- patient’s head to swell, however, it was not serious enough for
- him to be admitted. I remember receiving a call from Col (Dr.)
- John Stapp. He was in charge of the balloon project and was quite
- famous. Dr Stapp inquired about the injuries to the pilots and he
- wanted them returned to Holloman AFB as quickly as possible.
-
- The hospital was an old World War II cantonment-type building with
- long corridors and a capacity of fifty beds. I do not recall a
- nurse assisting me in the treatment of the patient, although a
- nurse may have been on duty and observed the patient. I was the
- only doctor in the hospital that morning. There were no visiting
- doctors from other bases or facilities. I do not remember any
- altercations or arguments that day. During my time at Walker, I do
- not recall that any autopsies were performed at the hospital, since
- we did not have a pathologist on staff. I do not recall any remains
- brought to the hospital in body bags, or wreckage transported in
- the back of an ambulance. There may have been remains brought to
- the hospital in body bags after a KC-97 crash, but that was before
- I arrived at Walker. Dr Ed Bradley was involved in the recovery of
- the remains.
-
- At no time was there ever any involvement of the Walker hospital
- with UFO’s or “space aliens” I know this to be true because the
- hospital was very small and had a small staff. If any activity,
- other than normal hospital functions, had occurred, I would have
- known about it.
-
- I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold or provide misleading
- information to the United States Government or the American public.
- There is no classified information that I am withholding related to
- this inquiry and I have never been threatened by U.S. Government
- persons concerning refraining from talking about this matter.
-
- SIGNED: Sworn to and subscribed before me,
- an individual authorized to administer
- oaths, this 25th day of May, 1995,
- at
-
- [Signature] [Signature]
- Charles A. Coltman, Jr., M.D. James McAndrew, 1st Lt, USAFR
-
- WITNESS(s):
- [Signature]
-
-
- STATEMENT OF WITNESS
-
- Place Date: 25 May 95
-
- I, Dan D. Fulgham, Col, USAF (Ret), hereby state that James
- McAndrew was identified as a Lieutenant, USAFR on this date at my
- place of employment and do hereby, voluntarily and of my own free
- will, make the following statement. This was done without having
- been subjected to any coercion, unlawful influence or unlawful
- inducement.
-
- I entered the U.S. Air Force in 1952 as an aviation cadet. I flew
- F-84s on 100 combat missions during the Korean war. After a tour as
- a flight instructor I was assigned to the Aero Medical Laboratory
- at Wright Patterson. I participated in both the Air Force Man in
- Space program and Project Mercury. I also participated in the X-15
- and X-20 programs and worked as a bioastronautics officer with NASA
- on Gemini. During my Air Force career, I earned both a Master’s and
- Doctorate degree from Purdue University. I flew a combat tour in
- Southeast Asia in F-4s as a member of the 555th Tactical Fighter
- Squadron and flew 133 combat missions. I retired from the Air Force
- in 1978 as the Commander of the Human Resources Laboratory at
- Brooks AFB, TX. I am presently the Director Of Biosciences for a
- research organization in San Antonio, TX.
-
- In 1959 I volunteered for training to become a back up pilot for
- Capt Joe Kittenger in his high altitude balloon projects. I flew
- two missions for training purposes with Capt Kittenger and Capt
- Bill Kaufman from Holloman AFB, NM in May, 1959. On the second
- flight we were practicing touch and go landings north of Roswell,
- NM when we “crashed” on one of the landings. The gondola flipped
- over and my head was pinned to the ground by the lip of the
- gondola. We managed to lift the gondola off of my head and looked
- it over for damage. Capt Kittenger was bleeding from a cut on his
- face and I noticed that my head seemed to be protruding outward
- from underneath my helmet. Realizing I was injured, I sat down and
- feared I might go into shock. I was not in pain but my entire head
- was throbbing and began to swell.
-
- I then remember boarding the “chase” helicopter that was following
- us and flying a short distance to Walker AFB for medical treatment.
- I recall walking into the hospital and also stopping on the
- front step to smoke a cigarette. I remember security personnel
- escorting and questioning us to determine who we were. Security
- was very tight at Strategic Air Command bases such as Walker. On
- occasion surprise inspection teams from SAC headquarters arrived
- in helicopters just as we did. In addition, a story of three Air
- Force officers crashing in a balloon was somewhat far fetched. The
- security people were convinced of our identities when they spoke
- with Col John P. Stapp, the Aero Medical Laboratory Commander.
-
- While I was at Walker my head had swelled considerably and both
- eyes were turning black. Later the skin on my face turned yellow.
- I remember being seen by one doctor and I do not believe any other
- doctors participated in my treatment. I do not recall any nurses
- attending to me. I also do not recall that a black NCO was present
- nor do I recall any civilian men in the hospital. I do not recall
- that Capt Kittenger was involved in an altercation of any kind
- while we were there. After I was treated and released we all flew
- back to Holloman on the helicopter.
-
- At Holloman I was admitted to the hospital and had blood aspirated
- from under my scalp. I remember my forehead drooping down, I had
- to use my fingers to open my eyelids, and I had to sleep sitting
- up. Several days later I returned to Wright Patterson with Capt
- Kittenger and Capt Kaufman. My wife met the airplane and when she
- saw me, she burst into tears due to the swelling of my head, the
- two black eyes, and the yellow color of my skin. When I returned to
- my office at Wright Patterson, my secretary also began to cry when
- she saw me. After some weeks my head returned to normal size and I
- was returned to flying status.
-
- During my Air Force career I was involved in many different
- scientific research projects including the space program. I can
- state with certainty that none of them, including the incident
- described here, had anything to do with UFOs or “space aliens”.
-
- I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold or provide misleading
- information to the United States Government or the American public.
- There is no classified information that I am withholding related to
- this inquiry and I have never been threatened by U.S. Government
- persons concerning refraining from talking about this matter.
-
- SIGNED: Subscribed and sworn before me, an
- individual authorized to administer
- oaths, this 25th day of May, 1995,
- at
-
- [Signature] [Signature]
- Dan D. Fulgham, Col, USAF (Ret) James McAndrew, 1st Lt, USAFR
-
- WITNESS(s):
- [Signature]
-
-
- STATEMENT OF WITNESS
-
- Place Date: 28 May 95
-
- I, Bernard D. Gildenberg, GS-14, (Ret), hereby state that James
- McAndrew was identified as a Lieutenant, USAFR on this date at my
- home and do hereby, voluntarily and of my own free will, make the
- following statement. This was done without having been subjected to
- any coercion, unlawful influence or unlawful inducement.
-
- I became involved in high altitude balloon development while an
- undergraduate student at New York University (NYU). Following
- graduation I was hired by the Air Force at Holloman AFB and worked
- continuously as both a meteorologist and aerospace engineer at
- the Balloon Branch from 1951 until my retirement in 1981. My job
- responsibilities were to forecast the weather and fly by remote
- control, high altitude balloons for many different scientific
- projects. During this time. I became internationally recognized as
- an authority on high altitude balloon trajectory forecasting. I
- have published numerous technical reports and articles.
-
- The first project in which I was involved, while still an
- undergraduate student at NYU, was the acoustical detection of
- nuclear explosions. The name of the project, Mogul, was classified
- and I didn’t know this name until several years ago. Based on
- my experience with this project I am certain project Mogul was
- responsible for some portions of what has become to be known as the
- “Roswell Incident”.
-
- Following project Mogul I was involved in perfecting high
- altitude balloon technology and made many test flights with large
- polyethylene balloons from Holloman AFB. I worked extensively on
- atmospheric sampling projects and biological flights in which
- the balloons lifted small animals to altitude for cosmic ray
- experiments. I also worked on the Moby Dick Project that collected
- meteorological data and the classified Gopher (119L) reconnaissance
- project.
-
- I was relied upon to forecast the weather, conduct climatological
- studies, predict balloon trajectories, and to hit with precision,
- ground targets both on and off the White Sands Missile Range.
- Balloon trajectories in New Mexico below the tropopause, are
- predominantly towards the east-northeast, when launched from
- Holloman AFB with the exception of July and August when balloons
- remained over the Holloman area. At high altitude, above the
- tropopause, trajectories are generally westerly during the summer
- and easterly during the spring, fall, and winter. As a result
- these winds, the Holloman balloon branch recovered many, probably
- hundreds, of balloons and scientific payloads from the Roswell, NM
- area over the years.
-
- During the time of the year when trajectories were to the east I
- attempted to drop the equipment near accessible non mountainous
- areas and paved roads. The main target area was the first large
- north-south road on the other side of the Sacramento Mountains
- from Holloman AFB, Highway 285. This road goes north and south
- through Roswell. The standard procedure was to preposition military
- recovery crews near the projected point of payload impact. The
- crews consisted primarily of Air Force members in uniform and
- they operated military vehicles. I often directed these crews to
- “standby” along the shoulder of Highway 285, both north and south
- of Roswell until the balloon was in position. The recovery crews
- received detailed instructions from the tracking aircraft that led
- them to the exact location of the payload. The recovery vehicle
- included, depending on the mission, a crane, weapons carriers,
- communications van, and occasionally tanker trucks to refuel the
- aircraft that would sometimes land on nearby roads.
-
- During the time of the year when balloon trajectories were to the
- west, I attempted to drop the payloads in the Rio Grande Valley.
- I also aimed for another valley, the flat area north of Truth or
- Consequences that includes the Plains of San Augustin. In addition,
- many remote balloon launch sites were located throughout the Rio
- Grande Valley west of the White Sands Proving Grounds. Launch crews
- were also mostly military and used much of the same equipment as
- the recovery crews.
-
- I had extensive involvement with Project 7218 that later became
- Project 7222. This project studied the free-fall characteristics
- of anthropomorphic dummies dropped from balloons from altitudes
- up to 100,000 feet. The missions usually consisted of two dummies
- attached to a suspension rack that I directed to be released at
- altitude. Depending on the wind conditions and time of year, the
- dummies, on many occasions, landed in the Roswell area. I recall
- some difficulties in the release mechanisms of the dummies that
- resulted in some of them free-falling to the ground while they were
- still attached to the rack. Someone without a good vantage point
- or not associated with the project might mistake these dummies for
- “aliens” due to their odd flesh tones and abstract human features.
-
- I also recall an accident involving a manned balloon flight. I
- remember this event clearly because I am also a balloon pilot
- and had an accident approximately two years before. The accident
- occurred on a flight that Capt Joe Kittenger was “checking out”
- two back up pilots for his high altitude missions. The balloon was
- launched around midnight from behind the Balloon Branch at Holloman
- AFB. I remember that some of the steel ballast used by the balloon
- caused a “fireworks” display when it contacted some nearby power
- lines during the launch. I was operating the control center for
- this flight and I received notification from the communications
- vehicle that was following the balloon that there had been an
- accident north of Roswell. I later learned that the gondola had
- rolled over during a practice touch and go landing and one of the
- pilots had been struck in the head and injured. I recall speaking
- to Capt Kittinger about the accident and I saw the injured pilot.
- Although his injury was not serious, his head had considerable
- swelling and he looked very odd.
-
- I also worked with Capt Kittinger on Project Stargazer. I also had
- met several times the civilian scientific advisor Dr. J. Allen
- Hynek. Dr Hynek was thoroughly familiar with the balloon operations
- at Holloman and visited the Balloon Branch numerous times. This
- project experienced some difficulties and only one manned flight
- was conducted.
-
- Another project I was involved with was the Air Force
- investigations of UFOs. Project Bluebook. Since I was a
- meteorologist and amateur astronomer I evaluated, starting in 1951,
- local sightings of UFOs. New Mexico had alot of sightings because
- of the good visibility and the many experimental projects of the
- White Sands Proving Grounds. During my time on Project Bluebook
- there wasn’t any sightings that we could not explain. Nevertheless
- popular literature still refers to some of these sightings as
- unexplained.
-
- Another project with which I was involved, was the NASA Voyager
- and Viking Projects. These space vehicles were tested by launching
- them from our balloons at extremely high altitude to simulate the
- atmosphere of Venus and Mars. To utilize the instrumentation on
- the White Sands Missile Range I elected to launch the balloons and
- attached space vehicles from the Roswell Industrial Air Center,
- formerly the Roswell Army Airfield. The Holloman Balloon Branch
- made approximately eight launches of these two vehicles from
- Roswell. In appearance the Viking and Voyager probes could be
- mistaken for a flying saucer. They were both unclassified highly
- publicized projects and I do not recall getting any UFO reports for
- these flights. I believe one of these probes is on display at White
- Sands Missile Range and its known as the “flying saucer”.
-
- I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold or provide misleading
- information to the United States Government or the American public.
- There is no classified information that I am withholding related to
- this inquiry and I have never been threatened by U.S. Government
- persons concerning refraining from talking about this matter.
-
- SIGNED: Subscribed and sworn before me, an
- individual authorized to administer
- oaths, this 25th day of May, 1995,
- at
-
- [Signature] [Signature]
- Bernard D. Gildenberg, GS-14 (Ret) James McAndrew, 1st Lt. USAFR
-
- WITNESS(s):
-
-
- STATEMENT OF WITNESS
-
- Place Date: 28 May 95
-
- I, Ole Jorgeson, MSgt. USAF, (Ret), hereby state that James
- McAndrew was identified as a Lieutenant, USAFR on this date at my
- home and do hereby, voluntarily and of my own free will, make the
- following statement. This was done without having been subjected to
- any coercion, unlawful influence or unlawful inducement.
-
- I enlisted in the U.S. Air Force in 1957 and became a Ground
- Communications and Electronic Repairman. I remained in this career
- field throughout my career. I completed three tours at the Balloon
- Branch at Holloman AFB, NM. I retired from the Air Force in 1977 as
- the NCOIC of the Communication and Instrumentation Section of the
- Balloon Branch at Holloman AFB.
-
- I recall an overnight balloon training mission that was conducted
- in May, 1959. Capt Joe Kittinger was training back up pilots
- for one of his upcoming projects. I was an airman assigned to
- coordinate communications and to assist in the recovery of the
- balloon upon completion of the mission. I followed the balloon in
- an old Korean War vintage “crackerbox” ambulance that had been
- converted into a communications van. Another airman and I followed
- the balloon throughout the night on an easterly trajectory over the
- Sacramento Mountains to an area north of Roswell. Also following
- the balloon were recovery technicians in a weapons carrier. We
- stayed in contact with the balloon crew by radio and also observed
- flares the crew would light at various intervals so we could
- visually track them. Just after sunrise I recall the balloon
- landing north of Roswell and Capt Kittinger offered me some coffee
- and told me he was going to make one more touch and go landing to
- complete the mission. I remember that I took some photographs of
- the balloon and waited for the last landing. Several minutes later
- I remember hearing a “bang”, this was the squib that fired to
- release the gondola from the balloon. We immediately went to where
- the gondola landed and saw the gondola laying on its side and saw
- two of the pilots standing and one lying down. Lying on the ground
- was a shattered helmet that was worn by one of the pilots. Capt
- Kittinger told me they were attempting to land to avoid some power
- lines and a row of trees.
-
- Soon after I arrived at the crash site, a helicopter that was also
- following the flight landed and transported the three aircrew
- members to Walker AFB for medical attention. I recall I assisted
- the recovery technicians load the balloon and the gondola on the
- weapons carrier and then drove 15 to 20 minutes to the hospital
- at Walker AFB. When I arrived at Walker, we parked the converted
- ambulance near the hospital and either the other airman with me
- or the recovery technicians called the balloon control center to
- notify them of the accident. I recall waiting near the hospital
- for a short period of time and then returning to Holloman AFB.
- During the time I was waiting at the hospital I did not observe
- any arguments or altercations. I did not observe Capt Kittinger
- speaking disrespectfully to anyone. I also do not recall any male
- civilians or any vehicles that belonged to a mortuary.
-
- I participated in many, probably more than 100, balloon recoveries.
- I often recovered payloads and balloons from the area surrounding
- Roswell, NM. It was routine to be directed by the balloon control
- center to an area near Roswell to wait to recover a balloon. We
- would wait along the side of the road, at small airports, or at
- the armory in Roswell. It would not be uncommon for our recovery
- vehicles to be seen waiting to recover balloons throughout New
- Mexico, Arizona, and West Texas. When we recovered the balloons
- and payloads sometimes civilians would be in the area and make
- inquires. We would tell them what we were doing and provide them
- with a telephone number at Holloman AFB if they wanted to report
- any damages. We were required to clean up the area and remove all
- debris before we left. In addition to the recoveries, I recall
- making balloon launches from sites up and down the Rio Grande
- Valley. I remember that some of these launches were made from an
- area west of Soccoro, NM.
-
- Another project I participated in was the testing of the Viking
- space probe in 1972. These four launches were all made from the
- Roswell Industrial Air Center, the former Roswell Army Airfield.
- Approximately twenty Air Force personnel were on temporary duty to
- Roswell throughout the summer of 1972 to support this project. NASA
- personnel prepared the spacecraft for launch from the old hangers
- of the former Air Force base. This project was not classified and
- was covered by the news media.
-
- I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold or provide misleading
- information to the United States Government or the American public.
- There is no classified information that I am withholding related to
- this inquiry and I have never been threatened by U.S. Government
- persons concerning refraining from talking about this matter.
-
- SIGNED: Subscribed and sworn before me, an
- individual authorized to administer
- oaths, this 25th day of May, 1995,
- at
-
- [Signature] [Signature]
- Ole Jorgesen, MSgt, USAF, (Ret) James McAndrew, 1st Lt, USAFR
-
- WITNESS(s):
-
-
- STATEMENT OF WITNESS
-
- Place Date: 28 October 1996
-
- I, William C. Kaufman, Lt. Col., USAF (Ret), hereby voluntarily and
- of my own free will, make the following statement. This was done
- without coercion, unlawful influence or unlawful inducement.
-
- I was drafted into the Army of the United States in 1943,
- transferred to the Army Air Forces, and was commissioned as a pilot
- in 1944. From 1950 until 1967, with a break for training for a
- combat tour in Korea and for educational assignments to AFIT, I was
- assigned to the Aero Medical Laboratory at Wright Patterson AFB,
- OH. During that time I was a physiological training officer and
- worked in the development of early pressure suits. I tested many
- high altitude pilots and also the first group of astronauts. Later
- during my Air Force career, in 1961, I earned a Ph.D. in Physiology
- and Biophysics. I was assigned to the Aero Medical Laboratory for
- three tours and retired in 1968 as the Chief of the Biodynamics
- Branch of the Aero Medical Field Laboratory at Holloman AFB, NM.
-
- During my third assignment at Wright Patterson, I volunteered,
- along with Capt Dan Fulgham, to be a backup pilot for Capt Joe
- Kittinger for his high altitude balloon project, Project Excelsior.
- Capt Kittinger instructed Capt Fulgham and me in ballooning in May
- 1959. At the end of an overnight training flight, on the morning
- of May 21, 1959, northwest of Roswell, NM, we (Kittinger, Fulgham
- and I) had an accident with the balloon. We were practicing touch
- and go landings when a severe gust of wind overturned the gondola,
- dumping all of us to the ground with the gondola on top of us.
- The accident occurred in a small pasture where a pony was grazing
- next to a small cottage. For safety, we were followed during hours
- of darkness by a C-131 aircraft and during the day by a H-21
- helicopter. We were followed the entire time by technicians in a
- truck for communications and for the recovery of the balloon and
- gondola. Seeing the accident, the crews of the helicopter and the
- recovery trucks came to our assistance, much to the dismay of the
- farmer who owned the pony, which had run away when the truck broke
- down the fence to reach the crash site. I recall that a member of
- the helicopter crew attempted to calm the farmer.
-
- Capt Fulgham sustained an injury to the forehead when the lip of
- the gondola struck him. Capt Fulgham thought he had fractured
- his skull but the experimental helmet he was wearing apparently
- protected him. Capt Kittinger was bleeding from a cut on the face.
- I was beneath Fulgham and Kittinger and unhurt. Fulgham was loaded
- into the helicopter and we were taken to the nearest hospital,
- at Walker AFB, in Roswell. I recall the helicopter pilot called
- the air traffic control tower at Walker and informed them we were
- inbound with an injured pilot from a balloon accident. This was
- quite unusual and I believe the tower personnel might have thought
- we were a surprise Strategic Air Command inspection team that at
- the direction of the SAC Commander, Gen. Curtis E. LeMay, sometimes
- made unannounced visits by helicopter. We landed in front of the
- tower and were met by an ambulance along with a detail of military
- police with machine guns. The military police escorted us to the
- hospital for treatment and to verify our story of the balloon crash.
-
- While Capt Fulgham and Capt Kittinger were being treated I was
- asked to explain to the Walker AFB Base Commander what had
- happened. After Capt Kittinger was treated he called Col Stapp from
- a phone adjacent to the waiting room were numerous military wives
- were waiting for pre-natal care. Capt Kittinger, as the project
- officer, was concerned what effect this accident might have on the
- future of his program. As we waited for Fulgham, Kittinger paced up
- and down the hall concerned about Fulgham and getting out of the
- hospital before Walker AFB officials might complicate matters. I
- do not recall any male civilians in the hospital, nor do I recall
- Capt Kittinger being involved in an altercation of any kind. Capt
- Kittinger did not shout or use obscene language, he was simply
- interested in getting medical attention for Fulgham and leaving as
- soon as possible. I do recall that one or two nurses were present.
- I do not recall a black NCO accompanying Kittinger while we were in
- the hospital.
-
- When the medical personnel were finished treating Fulgham, all
- three of us returned to Holloman AFB by helicopter about noon the
- same day. The following day I took my FAA exam and was awarded a
- balloon pilot license. Three days later, on Sunday, Kittinger,
- Fulgham and I returned to Wright Patterson via a special C-131
- flight. Fulgham looked very odd with two black eyes and protruding
- forehead; his head was so swollen he could not wear his uniform hat
- for some time. I later worked with Capt Kittinger on the Stargazer
- project and and occasionally flew aircraft with him.
-
- During my entire time at the Aero Medical Laboratory I neither
- saw nor heard anything that would lead me to believe that the Air
- Force was keeping “aliens” at Wright Patterson. I knew there was a
- project on UFOs called Bluebook, at the base, but to my knowledge
- the Aero Medical Laboratory was not involved. Many scientific
- accomplishments came out of the various laboratories at Wright
- Patterson but I am unaware of any that might have involved aliens
- or UFOs.
-
- I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold or provide misleading
- information to the United States Government or the American public.
- There is no classified information that I am withholding related to
- this inquiry and I have never been threatened by U.S. Government
- persons concerning refraining from talking about this matter.
-
- This is as I recollect those events.
-
- SIGNED:
-
- [Signature]
- William C. Kaufman, LtCol. USAFC (Ret)
-
- WITNESS(s):
- [Signature: Patricia A. Kaufman]
-
-
- STATEMENT OF WITNESS
-
- Place Date: 24 June 95
-
- I, Joseph W. Kittinger. Jr., Col. USAF (Ret), hereby state that
- James McAndrew was identified as a Lieutenant, USAFR on this
- date at my home and do hereby, voluntarily and of my own free
- will, make the following statement. This was done without having
- been subjected to any coercion, unlawful influence or unlawful
- inducement.
-
- I entered the U.S. Air Force in 1949 as an Aviation Cadet. From
- 1950 to 1953 I flew fighters in Europe before being assigned to the
- Fighter Test Section at Holloman AFB, NM in July, 1953. During my
- tour as a test pilot I conducted the first zero gravity tests and
- was the balloon pilot of the first Project Man High high altitude
- research mission. In 1958 I was assigned to the Escape Section of
- the Aero Medical laboratory at Wright Patterson AFB, OH. During
- this tour I was the Project Officer of Project Excelsior and made
- three high altitude parachute jumps, the highest from 102,800 feet,
- which today remains a world record. For these jumps I was awarded
- the Hannon Trophy for 1960 by President Eisenhower. Following
- Excelsior, I was the Project Officer of Stargazer, a project that
- made astronomical observations from a high altitude balloon. I
- flew two combat tours in Southeast Asia with the Air Commandos. I
- later flew a tour in F-4s and was the Squadron Commander of the 555
- Tactical Fighter Squadron. I accumulated over 1,000 combat flying
- hours and I am credited with one aerial victory. I spent ten months
- as a POW in Hanoi. Upon my return I attended Air War College, flew
- F-4s and retired from the Air Force in 1978. In 1984 I became the
- first person to make a solo crossing of the Atlantic by balloon.
-
- In 1958 I was made the Project Officer of Excelsior by Col John
- Paul Stapp, the Aero Medical Laboratory Commander. I supervised
- and was actively involved in the dropping and recovery of
- anthropomorphic dummies from high altitude balloons at Holloman
- AFB, NM for this project. We also dropped dummies, from aircraft
- only, at Wright-Patterson AFB, OH. The object of the Holloman tests
- were to study the free fall characteristics of dummies dropped from
- balloons at altitudes of 50,000 to 100,000 feet. Based on this data
- we designed a parachute that stabilized the dummies and I later
- used this parachute on my three high altitude jumps.
-
- The balloons carrying the dummies were launched from various
- locations in New Mexico and often impacted off of the White Sands
- Proving Ground depending on the wind conditions. The dummies were
- outfitted with clothing and equipment of an Air Force pilot. The
- facial features of the dummies were not as pronounced as a human.
- The ears and noses did not protrude. I do not recall any dummies
- with ears or noses. Some of the dummies were not complete; they
- sometimes did not have arms or legs. To someone not associated with
- the project or who viewed the dummies from a distance, they could
- appear to be human or with some imagination a space “alien.” In
- fact, I recall one incident at Wright-Patterson where one of our
- dummies landed near the backyard of Gen. Rawlings, Commander of
- the Air Research and Development Command. Gen. Rawling’s wife was
- entertaining officer’s wives that afternoon when one of our dummy’s
- parachute failed to deploy and impacted the ground in full view of
- the ladies at Gen. Rawling’s home. I acted quickly to retrieve the
- dummy and went to the impact site and recovered it by throwing it
- in the back of a pickup truck and quickly driving away. Later that
- day I received a call from Col Stapp who informed me that some of
- the women at the party believed that the dummy was a human and they
- were appalled to see the careless nature in which the obviously
- dead or injured “parachutist” was hauled away.
-
- At Holloman AFB recoveries of the dummies were handled by the
- Balloon Branch but members of my project team, including myself,
- often assisted. The standard procedure was to track the dummy
- both from the ground and air to attempt to recover the dummies
- in a timely manner. On the ground we used an assortment of Air
- Force vehicles to track and recover not only the dummies but also
- other scientific balloon payloads. We used trucks, communications
- vans, converted field ambulances, cranes, and trailers. In the
- air we used helicopters, C-47s transports, and L-19 and L-20
- light observation aircraft. On occasion civilians would observe
- our recovery operations. We often attracted a crowd due to the
- odd appearance of the balloon payloads and dummies and also the
- aircraft that circled overhead or landed on nearby roads. We also
- used many of the same procedures and equipment to launch from off
- range locations. During the recoveries weapons were not carried
- because there was no classified information or equipment. I do not
- recall any altercations of any kind. At no time did I or any of the
- personnel makes threats against civilians. We always attempted to
- maintain good relations with the local civilians and explained the
- purpose of the project to them if they asked. We were directed to
- remove as much of the material dropped by the balloon as possible.
- Sometimes this was difficult because the balloon and pay load would
- break apart and cover a large area. We collected the debris in
- these cases by “fanning out” across a field until we had collected
- even very small portions of the payload and balloon. We were
- particularly careful to recover the large plastic balloons because
- cattle would ingest the material and the ranchers would file claims
- against the government. Additionally, there were reward notices
- that offered twenty five dollars for the return of the equipment
- attached to each of the balloons. I wrote a book, _The Long, Lonely
- Leap_ (E. P. Dutton & Co., 1961), that completely describes Project
- Excelsior and my participation.
-
- Also as a part of the high altitude balloon projects, I trained
- balloon pilots in May 1959 at the request of Col Stapp. Col Stapp
- was concerned that I might be injured as a result of the hazardous
- nature of the projects and he wanted backup pilots to be trained.
- The backup pilots, Capt Dan Fulgham and Capt Bill Kaufman were
- volunteers from the Aero Medical Laboratory and they were sent to
- Holloman from Wright-Patterson for training on a temporary duty
- basis. On our second training flight, Fulgham, Kaufman and I, flew
- an overnight mission that was launched at Holloman and ended with
- a crash northwest of Roswell, NM. We were followed on this mission
- by an aircraft at night, a helicopter during the day, and a ground
- crew in trucks at all times.
-
- I recall that just after sunrise the weather had deteriorated and I
- directed Fulgham to land the balloon in a small field. This was the
- last suitable field before we would overfly the City of Roswell. I
- remember approaching the field just over the trees and I recall our
- forward velocity was about 10–12 knots, a little fast for landing.
- When we touched down Fulgham cut the balloon away and due to the
- forward velocity the gondola flipped over spilling all three of us
- on the ground. While lying on the ground I realized that Fulgham
- was injured and Kaufman and I raised the gondola. Fulgham had been
- struck in the head by the edge of the gondola and I could see the
- blood rapidly accumulating under his scalp in the forehead area. We
- treated him for shock and soon the recovery vehicles and the chase
- helicopter arrived. I decided to transport Fulgham by helicopter to
- the hospital at nearby Walker AFB.
-
- When we arrived at Walker I remember that security was tight, as
- it was at all Strategic Air Command bases, and we were closely
- scrutinized by security personnel due to the unusual circumstances
- and early hour of our arrival. I had two concerns once we arrived
- at the hospital, first to get treatment for Fulgham and second
- to leave as soon as possible. After I was assured that Fulgham’s
- injuries were not serious I wanted to quickly leave the base before
- the Walker AFB Flying Safety Officer arrived to fill out an
- accident report. I didn’t want a report filed because an accident
- investigation would bring unwanted scrutiny to the project. Even
- though the project was unclassified I did not want any publicity or
- premature releases of information.
-
- Although Fulgham’s injuries were not serious, his head had swollen
- considerably—both eyes were black and his face had swollen so
- much you could barely see his nose. I believe that if someone saw
- him while we were at Walker they would have been startled. When
- his treatment was completed we all three returned to Holloman on
- the helicopter. At Holloman, Fulgham was admitted to the hospital
- and I made preparations for him to return to his duty station at
- Wright-Patterson AFB. Due to his grotesque appearance, I did not
- want Fulgham to fly on a commercial airline. I made arrangements
- for all of us to fly to Wright-Patterson on a C-131 a few days
- later. When we arrived at Wright-Patterson, I assisted Fulgham down
- the steps of the aircraft because his eyes were swollen shut and
- he could not see. His wife was waiting at the bottom of the steps
- of the aircraft and she asked me where her husband was. I replied
- “this is your husband” and she screamed and began to cry.
-
- While I was at the Walker AFB hospital, I do not recall any contact
- with a male civilian. I certainly did not call anyone an “SOB”
- or speak to anyone in a disrespectful manner. I did not make any
- threats or instruct anyone else to make threats. I recall nurses
- in the hospital but I am not certain if they participated in the
- treatment of Capt Fulgham. I was not accompanied by a black NCO at
- the hospital, but there may have been a black NCO on the balloon
- recovery team. I recall no body bags in the hospital and I am sure
- there were no “aliens” at the hospital, just Dan Fulgham with a
- very odd looking head injury.
-
- I was also involved in the joint Air Force, Navy, and Massachusetts
- Institute of Technology astronomical observation project, Project
- Stargazer. The object of this project was to make observations via
- a stabilized telescope mounted atop of a gondola suspended from
- a high altitude balloon. I was the USAF project officer and Dr
- J. Allen Hynek was the scientific advisor. I worked very closely
- with Dr Hynek over a period of five years from 1958 to 1963. Dr
- Hynek would typically spend a half day working on Stargazer and
- then the rest of the day participating as one of the consultants
- on the UFO study, Project Bluebook, that was also conducted at
- Wright-Patterson AFB. Dr Hynek, as the scientific advisor to
- Stargazer, was very familiar with the techniques and capabilities
- of the Air Force high altitude balloon program. Dr Hynek once
- approached me and we discussed at length, the possibility that
- Air Force high altitude balloons were responsible for many UFO
- sightings. We ended the conversation in agreement that the
- balloons probably accounted for many of the UFO sightings. In
- other conversations Dr Hynek always gave me the impression that
- there were very few UFO sightings that could not be explained by
- good scientific investigation. At no time did Dr Hynek mention
- or discuss the alleged “Roswell Incident”. I was therefore
- “flabbergasted” when Dr Hynek appeared to believe that some of
- these sightings were of an extraterrestrial origin.
-
- I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold or provide misleading
- information to the United States Government or the American public.
- There is no classified information that I am withholding related to
- this inquiry and I have never been threatened by U.S. Government
- persons concerning refraining from talking about this matter.
-
- SIGNED: Sworn to and subscribed before me,
- an individual authorized to administer
- oaths, this 25th day of May, 1995,
- at
-
- [Signature] [Signature]
- Joseph W. Kittinger, Jr., Col, USAF (Ret) James McAndrew, 1st Lt. USAFR
-
- WITNESS(s):
-
- [Signature: Sherry Kittinger]
-
-
- STATEMENT OF WITNESS
-
- Place Date: 31 May 95
-
- I, Roland H. Lutz, CMSgt, USAF, (Ret), hereby state that James
- McAndrew was identified as a Lieutenant, USAFR on this date at my
- home and do hereby, voluntarily and of my own free will, make the
- following statement. This was done without having been subjected to
- any coercion, unlawful influence or unlawful inducement.
-
- I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1947 and transferred to the U.S. Air
- Force in 1958. In June, 1958 I was assigned to the flight surgeon’s
- office at Holloman AFB, NM as an Aero Medical Technician. I served
- several tours in Southeast Asia and retired from the Air Force in
- 1974 as an Aero Medical Superintendent.
-
- On May 20–21, 1959 I was assigned to provide medical coverage for a
- balloon training mission that took off from Holloman AFB and ended
- with a crash near Roswell, NM. Capt Joe Kittinger was training
- two other pilots, Capt Fulgham and Capt Kaufman. I followed the
- balloon in an ambulance during the night and at daybreak I followed
- the balloon in an H-21 helicopter. Just after daybreak I saw the
- balloon crash and the three pilots were dumped form the gondola.
- I immediately informed the helicopter pilot and we landed in a
- field on which cattle were grazing. I recall the rancher was upset
- because the helicopter was frightening his cattle and some cattle
- had gotten out of the field.
-
- I assesed the injuries to the pilots and recommended they be taken
- immediately to the closest hospital which was at Walker AFB,
- apprximately 5 to 10 minutes away by helicopter. Capt Fulgham’s
- head was swelling due to a hemotoma he received when the gondola
- struck him. Capt Kittinger was cut on the face and was bleeding.
- Capt Kaufman was uninjured. At Walker I remember a telephone
- conversation with a flight surgeon who told me to “go home and
- sleep it off”. He apparently did not believe my story of three
- Air Force pilots that were victims of a balloon crash. However,
- I was able to convince him and he treated Capt Fulgham and Capt
- Kittinger. While at the hospital Capt Fulgham’s head had swelled
- enormously and his eyes were beginning to turn black.
-
- I do not recall that anything unusual occurred at the hospital
- at Walker. I remember the three pilots sitting on a bench in
- the hallway waiting to be treated. I do not remember that Capt
- Kittinger was involved in an altercation with anyone while at the
- hospital, if he had, I would have known about it. Capt Kittinger
- was concerned with getting medical treatment for his injured crew
- member, Capt Fulgham, and returning to Holloman. I also do not
- recall a black NCO accompanying Capt Kittinger while we were at
- the hospital. I do not remember a nurse assisting in the treatment
- of Capt Fulgham or Capt Kittinger. I also do not remember a male
- civilian or any personnel or vehicles from a mortuary, and I do not
- recall any remains in body bags in the hospital.
-
- I was present the entire time when the events described here took
- place. I am certain that this event had nothing to do with “space
- aliens” or any other irregular activity that would require a cover
- up. It was a balloon crash and nothing else.
-
- I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold or provide misleading
- information to the United States Government or the American public.
- There is no classified information that I am withholding related to
- this inquiry and I have never been threatened by U.S. Government
- persons concerning refraining from talking about this matter.
-
- SIGNED: Subscribed and sworn before me, an
- individual authorized to administer
- oaths, this 25th day of May, 1995,
- at
-
- [Signature] [Signature]
- Roland H. Lutz, CMSgt, USAF, James McAndrew, 1st Lt, USAFR
- (Ret)
-
- WITNESS(s):
-
- [Signature]
- Harry C. Aderholt, Brig. Gen., USAF (Ret)
-
-
- STATEMENT OF WITNESS
-
- Place Date: 20 June 95
-
- I, Raymond A. Madson, Lt Col, USAF (Ret), hereby state that James
- McAndrew was identified as a Lieutenant, USAFR on this date at my
- place of employment and do hereby, voluntarily and of my own free
- will, make the following statement. This was done without having
- been subjected to any coercion, unlawful influence or unlawful
- inducement.
-
- I was born, raised, and presently reside in New Mexico. I graduated
- from New Mexico A&M College in 1954. I entered the Air Force in
- 1955 and was assigned a short time later to the Aero Medical
- Laboratory at Wright Patterson AFB, OH. At the Aero Medical
- Laboratory I was assigned to the Escape Section as a project
- officer and test parachutist. During this time I also had extensive
- participation in various aspects of the space program and worked
- on the highly classified U-2 project. I served a tour of duty in
- Alaska and at the School of Aerospace Medicine at Brooks AFB,
- TX, before being reassigned to the Aero Medical Laboratory at
- Wright Patterson. I retired in from the Air Force in 1979 and I am
- currently and Environmental Specialist for the State of New Mexico.
-
- The first project that I was assigned at Wright Patterson was
- Project 7218, later changed to Project 7222. This project was first
- known by the name High Dive and then was known as Excelsior. The
- object of this project was to study the free fall characteristics
- of anthropomorphic dummies from balloons at altitudes of 50,000
- to 100,000 feet. Following satisfactory dummy drops, Capt Joe
- Kittinger made a series of high altitude parachute jumps that
- culminated with a jump from 102,800 feet.
-
- I assumed the duties of Project Officer for the dummy drops in the
- spring of 1956. I made numerous trips to Holloman AFB, NM, the
- site of the drops, from 1956 until the end of the project in 1959
- (dummies were also dropped for this project at Wright Patterson
- AFB by personnel from the Parachute Branch). I wrote two technical
- reports that described the project in considerable detail. The
- type of anthropomorphic dummy used primarily was manufactured by
- Alderson Laboratories but we also used Sierra Manufacturing type
- dummies. Both of these dummies are shown in the technical reports.
- The Alderson dummy had facial features that were not life-like
- and ears that were not well defined. The dummies were outfitted
- with flight suits of various colors, fuchsia, olive drab, and sage
- green (a shade of gray). We chose the Alderson dummy because it was
- relatively inexpensive as compared to the Sierra dummy.
-
- We encountered considerable difficulty dropping the dummies from
- the balloons. I designed the rack that suspended the dummies, two
- at a time, from the balloon. On numerous occasions the dummies were
- fouled during the release sequence and the dummy rode a “streamer”
- all the way to the ground. Other times malfunctions occurred that
- caused the two dummies and the entire rack assembly to descend to
- the ground as one package. Both of these instances are described in
- the technical reports.
-
- I participated in at least two dummy recoveries. The meteorologist
- from the Balloon Branch, Duke Gildenberg, would determine the best
- place to launch the balloons depending on the prevailing weather
- conditions. Duke also predicted, with considerable accuracy,
- where the dummies would impact. I specifically recall a dummy I
- recovered near the Jornada test range, between Leasburg and Organ,
- NM. During this recovery I drove a weapons carrier and I was only
- able to locate one of the dummies. I never found out what happened
- to the other one. The next recovery I remember was on a ranch just
- southwest of Roswell. We were given directions to the area by the
- balloon branch personnel who had been contacted by a rancher. The
- equipment had reward notices taped to them to aid in recovery. We
- went to the Smith ranch. I remember the name because I went to New
- Mexico A&M with the rancher. I knew him as Smitty. We searched that
- day from horseback and could not find the dummies. The following
- day we resumed our search from horseback and again could not
- find the dummies. I also recall that Smitty asked us for some of
- the parachute material so he could make a shirt. We dropped many
- dummies from the balloons and I know many were not immediately
- recovered, but most were.
-
- I served for twenty five years in the Air Force and most of those
- years were in the aero medical field. I participated in the space
- program and the highly classified early stages of U-2 program.
- Never during this time were “aliens” or “flying saucers” a part of
- any project. There were, however, countless achievements by the
- Air Force in aerospace medicine that were the result of dedicated
- scientific research. It seems likely to me that someone could have
- mistaken our anthropomorphic dummies for something that they were
- not.
-
- I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold or provide misleading
- information to the United States Government or the American public.
- There is no classified information that I am withholding related to
- this inquiry and I have never been threatened by U.S. Government
- persons concerning refraining from talking about this matter.
-
- SIGNED: Sworn to and subscribed before me,
- an individual authorized to administer
- oaths, this 25th day of May, 1995,
- at
-
- [Signature] [Signature]
- Raymond A. Madson, Lt Col, James McAndrew, 1st Lt, USAFR
- USAF (Ret)
-
- WITNESS(s):
-
-
- STATEMENT OF WITNESS
-
- Date: 25 April 1996 Place: Aztec, NM
-
- I Frank B. Nordstrom, M. D., hereby state that James McAndrew,
- was identified as a Captain, USAFR on this date at my home and do
- hereby, voluntarily and of my own free will, make the following
- statement. This was done without having been subjected to any
- coercion, unlawful influence or unlawful inducement.
-
- I was on active duty in the US Air Force and stationed at Walker
- AFB, Roswell, NM from July 1951 until June 1953. During that time I
- was a pediatrician assigned to the base hospital. Following my tour
- of duty with the Air Force I attended the University of Colorado as
- a resident in pediatrics. In July 1954 I relocated to Farmington,
- NM and began a private pediatric practice. I retired from private
- practice in 1987 and became the Medical Director of the San Juan
- Regional Medical Center, which is also located in Farmington, NM.
- In 1989 I retired from that position and presently reside in Aztec,
- NM.
-
- I have been shown two transcripts of interviews where an individual
- named Glenn Dennis described conversations and visits he claims
- he had with a pediatrician in the late 1940s or early 1950s in
- Farmington, NM. According to these interviews, Mr Dennis also
- claims that this pediatrician had previously served at the hospital
- at Walker AFB/Roswell AAF. Since I am the only physician in
- Farmington, NM who previously served at the Walker AFB/Roswell
- AAF hospital, I believe I am the person he is referring to in
- these interviews. I am confident of this because I know I was the
- first pediatrician to practice in Farmington, which when I arrived
- in 1954, was a small community of approximately 8,000 people. I
- remained the sole pediatrician there for approximately 20 years and
- I know most, if not all, of the physicians in the area.
-
- Even though I believe I am the person Mr Dennis referred to in the
- interviews, I do not remember him. I can state with reasonable
- certainty that I cannot recall any conversations with him, and he,
- to my knowledge, never visited me in Farmington, NM, in Colorado,
- or anyplace else. I have been told, however, that a person named
- Glenn Dennis operated a drugstore in the late 1950s-early 1960s,
- just outside Farmington, in Aztec, NM. But I do not recall any
- contact with him there either.
-
- While I was stationed at Walker AFB, I do not recall any incidents
- that may explain the information Mr Dennis provided in the
- interviews. To my knowledge there was only one fatal aircraft
- accident during my tour of duty and that accident involved a Walker
- AFB based aircraft in the United Kingdom. I was not involved in any
- aspect of that accident. I also do not recall any other incidents
- such as automobile accidents or house fires that may be the source
- of this information. Nor do I recall a nurse named Lt Naiomi Selff
- or a nurse named Capt “Slats” Wilson. While at Walker AFB I did not
- witness or hear rumors of anything that involved flying saucers,
- aliens, or anything else of an extraterrestrial nature.
-
- I am not part of a conspiracy to withhold information from either
- the US government or the American public, there is no classified
- information that I am withholding related to this inquiry and I
- have not been threatened by US government persons concerning not
- talking about this matter.
-
- SIGNED: Sworn to and subscribed before me,
- an individual authorized to administer
- oaths, this 25th day of April 1996 at
- Aztec, NM
-
- [Signature] [Signature]
- Frank B. Nordstrom, M.D. James McAndrew, Capt, USAFR
-
- WITNESS:
-
-
-
-
- Appendix C
-
-
- Transcript of Interview with
- Gerald Anderson[*]
- Alleged firsthand witness to
- “Crash Site” Two
- (allegedly 175 miles northwest of Roswell)
-
- [*] Excerpted from raw footage used to prepare the video,
- _Recollections of Roswell Part II_, (Washington, D.C.: Fund for UFO
- Research, 1993).
-
-A: We drove down to the Plains of San Agustin which is west of Socorro,
-New Mexico in the Magdalena, Datil, area. We were down there looking
-for banded and moss agate, which according to my uncle Ted and my
-cousin Victor was prevalent in the area. My brother being an amateur
-rock hound had wanted to get some of this. That was a way of showing us
-around the area. They had relatives down in Magdalena that they wanted
-to introduce us to.
-
-So we had gone down there and we got down in the Horse Springs area and
-had driven off onto the plains down an old rutted road for, oh, a mile
-or so and it seemed like a long ways. We parked the car, got out of the
-car and walked down a hillside.
-
-There’s a semi-forest, I guess you could say. It had pinon trees and
-scrub oak and stuff like that on it and we walked—well, not scrub oak,
-but cedar—and walked down the hillside into an arroyo, a dry wash, and
-then walked south down a dry wash toward where the agates were supposed
-to be at.
-
-As we came around a bend in the arroyo that had pinon and cedar
-trees growing, we were able to see farther ahead down the arroyo and
-on the next ridge line there was a large silver disc shaped object
-was embedded in this side of the ridge line ... there was debris
-and wreckage strewn about the area mainly this thing was intact. I
-would estimate its size from an adult perspective to something like
-35 feet in diameter. I’ve heard other people who were there say they
-thought it was like 50 feet. But as an adult, I would say about 35
-feet in diameter, quite large. When we got up to it there were four
-bodies there ... not human, there was two of them that were obviously
-dead, one of them was obviously very badly injured, and one of them
-apparently suffered no ill effects ... or it didn’t appear to be
-injured and was ambulatory, was mobile. It was just setting there next
-to the one...
-
-Q: Were they right next to the vehicle?
-
-A: Right next to it. Right under the edge of it. And this craft had
-apparently come in from the east and bounced off one ridge line,
-plowing through this arroyo area and then crashed into the ridge line
-and embedded itself. They were sitting back under the edge, it was kind
-of tilted up like this and they were sitting back under the edge here.
-And I’m assuming that this one creature that was all right had laid
-this material on the ground but it looked like unrolled tinfoil that
-these other three creatures were laying on. Like it was trying—like
-you do a person in shock, you know, a put him on a blanket, that kind
-of thing. And apparently it had some boxes there around it and had
-apparently been trying to give first aid or help these other creatures
-when we first got there.
-
-As we approached, the creature drew back like this, like it was in
-fear, like we were going to hurt it. And it wasn’t very long, you know,
-we were trying to communicate with it, the adults were. It seemed
-to calm down and just sat there and kind of looked back and forth,
-watching them, apparently trying to figure out what was going on...
-
-Q: What did it look like, a little bit more.
-
-A: These creatures, all of them, were, oh, about four foot tall, four
-and a half feet tall. They had very large heads that were shaped larger
-on the top and they kind of tapered down, not to a real sharp point
-but just tapered down where they were thin. And they had very large,
-very large, oval shaped or almond shaped, I guess you could say, black
-eyes. The head... They were so shiny, they had almost a bluish tint to
-them when the light reflected off of them. Their skin coloration, the
-best way that I could describe that is it was kind of a bluish tinted
-milky-white. It looked like someone in shock. And the ones that were
-laying on the ground were really—really looked more that way, more blue
-in the light, you know...
-
-Q: How about ears, nose, mouth?
-
-A: No, there were no visible ears on the creatures except like—if you
-was just to cover your ear like this to where there was just a rise
-there and then a hole without, you know, your ear lobe and the rest of
-the area...
-
-Q: How about nose?
-
-A: It was—the nose was very, very small, almost imperceptible. It’s
-like two holes, straight in; and the lips were just a straight line. It
-was like a cut and you couldn’t see, just the lips like we have, it was
-just a slit. And...
-
-Q: What hair color? Sound?
-
-A: Pardon?
-
-Q: What hair color?
-
-A: There was no hair. They were completely bald.
-
-Q: And no sounds?
-
-A: I never heard a sound one, not out of any of the creatures including
-the one that was...
-
-Q: Did you see fingers?
-
-A: Yes, they had fingers like this. They didn’t have a little finger.
-They just had the thumb and three extra digits except the center digit
-was longer and the other two were about the same size. They were very
-long and slender and looked very delicate and I made the statement
-before and I’ll make it again, I think he would have made an excellent
-violinist because of the structure of their hands.
-
-They were wearing one piece suits. All of them were dressed exactly the
-same. It was sort of a real shiny silverish gray color.
-
-Q: No zippers, buttons?
-
-A: No, I saw no zippers, no buttons.
-
-Q: Insignias?
-
-A: No, no insignias. The only thing that was different, you know, and
-they all had this, but the only that was different from the silvery
-gray thing, the suit, was that down like a seam line, like there was
-a seam on his shoulder and around the collar it was trimmed in what
-appeared to be maroon, like cording.
-
-Then the suits were continuous with their footwear. We could see right
-this area down, it seemed to be less pliable then it was up here, like
-this was a stiffer area, like they were boots or shoes or something.
-But they were all dressed exactly the same.
-
-Q: Okay. So you and your family are talking back and forth, wondering
-what was going on, what did your family say? I mean...
-
-A: Well...
-
-Q: ...did they say anything?
-
-A: Yes, my brother, one of his first remarks I heard him say him say,
-“That’s a god damn spaceship.” You know there were bodies up there and,
-you know, I was told not to go up there, which I didn’t. And...
-
-Q: How old was your brother at the time?
-
-A: He was in his early twenties, I think, 20, 21, something like that.
-
-Q: He was a lot older than you were?
-
-A: Oh, yes, considerably.
-
-When we got up there I kind of meandered off to one side. This thing
-was cocked up and I was standing here, the bodies were here, and
-everybody else was kind of down here except my cousin Victor was over
-here playing and looking in this gaping hole on the side of this disk.
-And it was shaped just like a discus except for a round dome was up on
-top and there was this big gaping gash in there. We could see inside
-and it looked like a double hull.
-
-Q: How big—explain it? The gash.
-
-A: The dome?
-
-Q: No, the gash.
-
-A: Well, it covered the greater majority from the center of the craft
-out. It was just like a gaping hole in there. I mean I’m thinking, you
-know, it’s like about 32, 35 feet in diameter so we’re talking about 17
-feet maybe. Most of that one side was ripped open like that. You could
-see inside and you could see another double hull, like—in there. And
-there were just rows of components that was on there.
-
-And there were lights that flashed on and off. Some of them were steady
-and some were flashing. There was a lot of debris and stuff hanging out
-of the hole. There was evidence that there apparently had been fire. It
-looked like it had been burned along the edge there. The gash...
-
-Q: Now this wasn’t a gash that could have been caused by the thing
-coming in for the ground? It wasn’t at the leading edge of the vehicle?
-
-A: No, no. This was in the side like—it almost appeared it was
-elliptical. It almost appeared as if something the same shape as the
-disk we were looking at had hit that same—you know, like it hit the
-disk and left an imprint that pretty closely approximated the outside
-diameter of the disk itself. And it appeared to be caved in looking,
-kind of like it hit them like this and it just crumpled and caved in
-and ripped it open.
-
-Q: Okay, so you’re there, you take all this in, everybody is mystified.
-What were the circumstances outside? Hot, cold?
-
-A: Very, very hot. Incredible to me, being the first time in New Mexico
-and coming from back east. I had dry heaves. It was like the inside of
-an oven. It was unbelievable to me. You know, the odd part about this
-was that the closer you got to it, the cooler it was. And standing
-under it in the shade there next to these creatures’ bodies, it was
-like refrigerated air conditioning. And...
-
-Q: Did you feel air coming out of this thing?
-
-A: No, it was just like it was (inaudible).
-
-And I remember reaching up and putting my hand on the side of it but I
-think I was afraid I was going to hit my head because there was enough
-room for me as small child, you know, I was approximately the same size
-as these creatures, to walk up under there and stand there but I kind
-of did like that, put my hand up against this thing.
-
-Q: What did it feel like?
-
-A: It was ice cold. It felt like it just came out of a freezer.
-
-Q: Was it smooth? Was it rough?
-
-A: It was very smooth. It had a very smooth texture to it. It was
-obviously made out of metal. It was very solid and it was very cold,
-ice cold.
-
-And there was a smell in the area. It smelled volatile, acrid, like
-acetone. And that seemed to be coming out of that gash, that smell. But
-the closer you got to this thing, the cooler it was so, you know, I
-kind of remained there.
-
-And I guess that while they were over here, my father and my uncle Ted
-and my brother. Uncle Ted was trying to talk to this thing in Spanish
-and of course it didn’t understand a word he said. And dad tried to
-talk to it and then they tried, you know, sign language and that didn’t
-work.
-
-And I don’t know, for some reason, I just—I reached down and touched
-it, this one that was laying next to me. When I touched it I realized
-and I jumped back. It scared me. It startled me because I suddenly
-realized that these weren’t dolls. I thought they were plastic dolls.
-And I—you know, it was still in my mind that these were dolls until I
-touched it and then I realized, you know, this was a dead thing.
-
-I’d seen dead relatives before and unfortunately made a mistake one
-time in touching a relative that was in a casket and I just knew this
-was a dead thing and it scared me, and I ran around behind my father
-and my uncle and this thing was sitting there on the ground and it kept
-looking back and forth. And it just had its hands like this in its lap,
-and just kept looking back and forth between the three of them and—like
-it was trying to understand.
-
-And all of a sudden it just turned and looked right straight at me
-between my uncle Ted and myself. And this is when—it was just like an
-explosion of things in my head, things... I started, you know, feeling,
-just terrible depression and loneliness and fear and just, you know,
-awful, awful feelings that just suddenly burst in to my mind there. I
-don’t know if that meant that it was communicating with me and I was
-the only one there that it could communicate with because I was a kid.
-I don’t know.
-
-I turned and ran and I ran across the arroyo and up on the area that it
-had bounced off of during the crash. I was just standing there looking
-down at this scene, you know, at my family, and off in the distance I
-could see cattle grazing. I could see a windmill and could see dust
-trails out on the plains out there.
-
-And, oh, I was there for a while and then I came back down. I guess we
-were there—Victor was, when I got back down there Victor was up in the
-craft and Ted yelled at him to get out of there and Glen went over and
-grabbed him by the belt and jerked him around...
-
-Q: That’s your brother?
-
-A: Yes.
-
-And jerked him off, says, “Get out because this thing may explode and
-kill us all,” you know, and then of course he went prowling around in
-there.
-
-I was kind of standing off to one side looking. That’s why I knew that
-there was—I can look off these rocks that I was standing on and look
-right into this thing. That’s why I knew, you know, about the lights
-and the components and stuff.
-
-And then I heard other people talking. I turned and there was a group
-of people coming up the arroyo from out on the plains from the south.
-They had come up there and of course they walked up and was talking.
-
-Q: How many?
-
-A: There was an older man and five younger students.
-
-Q: Boys, girls?
-
-A: Three boys and two girls. And they were all, you know, introducing,
-talking to my father and my uncle and my brother...
-
-Q: What did the older one look like?
-
-A: He was a very tall man, a very big man. He was wearing a pith helmet
-when he first came up, one of those kind of explorer helmets. And he
-was bald and I know that because he had taken it off and he had, you
-know, wiped it with a handkerchief and put it back on. He was a balding
-man. And he had a round face. He was very ruddy complected. A big man,
-and he apparently was a doctor because they kept calling him doctor and
-it was my understanding that it was an archeological group that was out
-there on some kind of summer thing. And they talked and he apparently
-was able to speak several foreign languages and he tried to talk to
-this creature several times in different languages, again to no avail.
-
-Q: How did they happen to be there? Had he seen the thing...
-
-A: Well, they claim that they saw—they said they saw this thing come
-down the night before in flight, you know, and they thought it was a
-meteorite and they had talked about well, early in the morning, you
-know, we’ll go over and see this, where this meteor came down, because
-that’s what they thought it was.
-
-And when the sun came up the next morning, you know, and they got
-about their business, got up and somebody looked over and said, you
-know, they saw this shiny metal and stuff across the plains there and
-they realized it wasn’t a meteorite, it may have been an airplane that
-had crashed so they all decided to go over there and see if there was
-anybody left alive, you know, that was hurt that needed help.
-
-Q: They had driven over?
-
-A: No, they walked over apparently, the way I understand it. And it’s
-quite a ways across that plain so it had to take a very long time
-to do this or they may have had a vehicle, I don’t know. That’s an
-assumption, I think, on my part, where they walked.
-
-Q: Okay. So they’re around...
-
-A: But they came across...
-
-Q: ...with the family...
-
-A: ...the plains. I don’t know why I said that. I’m not sure if they
-drove or not. I didn’t hear any cars.
-
-Q: And then somebody else shows up?
-
-A: Yes, they were down just, oh, 15 maybe 20 minutes tops, you know.
-And they were picking up things, some of the students. And this Dr.
-Buskirk, that they called him, this one girl went up and said, “Look,
-doctor, wouldn’t this make a beautiful ring?” And she was holding what
-looked like a red rod, a red tube that was some kind of silvery-red.
-
-And he kind of snapped at her, you know, “Put that down because you
-don’t know what that thing is. That thing could hurt you. Don’t pick
-this stuff up.”
-
-And she kind of said, “Well, yes, okay, doctor.” And then he went back
-to what he was doing and she walked away and put it in her pocket.
-
-And a lot of them were doing this, sort of picking up things and
-feeling things. I was picking up things and feeling things. It was all
-kinds of material and metal, stuff like that. I heard it, well, we all
-heard it, the sound of a motor coming, like a truck. And I went back up
-the incline area to the ridge line and I could see out there, there was
-a truck coming up. It was an old pick-up truck. It was sort of a beige
-color, a tan colored van with an antenna on it. And it stopped and this
-guy got out and he’s wearing brown clothes. He’s got boots on and he’s
-wearing a straw hat, just like the kind that Harry Truman always wore,
-and he had wire rimmed glasses. He was a big man and he looked exactly
-like Harry Truman to me. You know, I’d seen him in the Movietone News...
-
-Q: He was president then.
-
-A: Yes, I was well aware who Harry Truman was. Everybody was. He was
-kind of a hero, you know, and he just kind of looked like him except
-bigger, bigger. You know, I don’t think he—and he didn’t look as old
-either. His hair was kind of light gray.
-
-And he walked over there and they got to talking, you know, with
-everybody and he told them that he worked out on the plains out there
-and that he made maps and that he had seen the wreckage from out there
-on the plains and he saw the people and he thought it was a plane wreck
-and, you know, that something was going on and he came over to see.
-
-And he hadn’t been there but just a very, very few minutes when we
-heard all kinds of motors and engines straining and stuff. And here
-comes a military car with a big white star on the side of it followed
-by a six-by which is a military truck with a kind of canvas wagon, kind
-of a canvas thing over it and it’s full of soldiers. They’ve got guns.
-And right behind them is what we call a four-by which is like a medium
-sized jeep/truck situation and it had two big high whip antennas, all
-kinds of radio gear in the back and a guy back there with ear phones
-and stuff on and he’s, you know, working these radios. And they all
-pulled up and stopped.
-
-Q: Which direction did they come from, do you know?
-
-A: They came from the north, from the Horse Springs area, right...
-
-Q: So they could have come off the highway there...
-
-A: Oh, yes. I’m sure that’s exactly how they got there. They come off
-the highway, the same way we did. Well, in the meantime, when they
-stopped, this black soldier, this sergeant, the reason I know he was
-a sergeant, my brother told me he was, and he got out of this car and
-then a guy got out on the other side and he was a, Glen said he was a
-captain, he told me later he was a captain and this guy had orange and
-red hair. So all the soldiers and them came running over there pointing
-guns at people, telling them, “Get away, get away, get away,” you know?
-And when this creature saw these people, the military, he went nuts. He
-went into an absolute panic, worse than what he did when he saw us.
-
-Q: Did he move around or just his eyes or...
-
-A: He just, he just...
-
-Q: Oh, okay.
-
-A: ...went crazy. And it was like...
-
-Q: Like he was scared?
-
-A: Yes, like he was looking for a place to run and hide.
-
-Q: But he never got up?
-
-A: He never got up. He never left the beings that were next to him.
-
-And this red headed officer, this guy was a real butt hole. He made all
-the threats. He threatened to have people shot.
-
-Q: Everybody?
-
-A: He went, “Get away, get away,” you know, “We’ll shoot. Get away
-from there. This is a military secret.” You know, just screaming and
-hollering. He told my uncle and my father that if they didn’t want to
-spend the rest of their life in prison they would never say anything
-about what they saw there, if they ever wanted to see us kids again,
-they’d take the kids away. They’d never see the kids, you know, meaning
-me and Victor. That we’d better keep our mouths shut because if we did
-not, this is what was going to happen. They were threatening people and
-pushing people...
-
-Q: The students as well and Dr. Buskirk?
-
-A: Oh, yes. They were hustling everybody. And one of the soldiers
-pushed my uncle. He had a rifle like this and he shoved him back like
-that. Well, that was something you didn’t do to my uncle Ted. Ted had
-a violent temper. And he grabbed the rifle and reached over top and
-smacked this guy and dropped him right there. And Ted would go out and
-fight, heck, this guy’s a cowboy. He’ll hit you in a minute.
-
-And of course when he did that there was bolts opened and I guess
-cocking, they were cocking their rifles. They were pointing guns at
-people and everybody Buskirk and Glen and dad grabbed him, you know,
-pulled him back and got him away. “No, don’t, Ted, they’re going to
-shoot. Don’t do that.” You know, trying to stop this. And I think we
-came very close to having someone shot.
-
-Then they really started threatening, you know, and they...
-
-Q: Did the redhead do all the talking, pretty much?
-
-A: Pretty much. Except once in a while the sergeant would, you know,
-chime in and make statements like that to other people in response to
-the redhead. But mainly it was the redhead...
-
-Q: Was there a name tag?
-
-A: Yes, sir, there was. His name was Armstrong. And I’m not sure if I
-know that from having read it or know that from remembering it and now
-being able to read it in my memory, or if someone said that to me. But
-his name was Armstrong, it was right here on his uniform.
-
-Q: But he chased you guys away pretty quick?
-
-A: Yes, yes, he did.
-
-And they herded us up like cattle and we were just up the arroyo, back
-in the direction we came from, over the protest of this Dr. Buskirk who
-said, “No, no, we’ve got to go the other way. We came from over there.”
-
-“I don’t care where you came from, get your ass up the arroyo.”
-
-And they ran us up the arroyo and...
-
-Q: So you get to your car again?
-
-A: Oh, right.
-
-Now they took us up the arroyo and just over the hill we came down,
-they broke us off and moved us up the hill.
-
-Now this whole time, no one has ever frisked us down, no one has ever
-checked our pockets to see if we picked up any of this material and
-this girl, Agnes, still had that stuff in her pocket and some of the
-other students had stuff. To my knowledge, up to that point, they had
-not been searched. Whether they did so afterward, I don’t know. They
-never searched us, ever. They ran us back up the hill and when we got
-to where the car was parked, where dad had parked the car up there,
-there’s a jeep with a guy sitting in the back and there is a mounted
-machine gun in the back of this jeep and all of these soldiers.
-
-The jeep pulls out, we’re told to get in the car, we follow the jeep,
-and the soldiers go with us all the way back out to the highway. When
-we get back out to the highway, they set us right there. They wouldn’t
-let us out of the car. They wouldn’t let us move forward. I don’t know
-whether they were making a decision or what.
-
-When we got out to the highway, this place was absolutely full of
-military personnel, military equipment. There was airplanes sitting out
-there that they had landed on the highway.
-
-Q: Did you see any airplanes when you were back at the site?
-
-A: Yes, there was airplanes in the sky but nobody thought much about.
-You know, I didn’t think anything about it. I was used to airplanes
-being in the sky, having been raised in Indianapolis, Indiana, the home
-of the Norden bombsight, you know, the sky was always full of military
-aircraft at night.
-
-And when we get back on to the highway, there’s observation aircraft,
-you know, high winged aircraft, and there’s one, of what I know now to
-be a C-47 setting there. And how we didn’t hear that land is beyond me
-and how he landed—well, of course, I guess you could land it if you’re
-a good pilot out there as there were no poles or anything.
-
-And it was—they had torn the fence down on the north side of the highway
-and all this equipment was setting back up there. The plane was up
-there and they were taking stuff out of the plane. There was military
-ambulances and there were trucks with—like wreckers, cranes on them.
-And there was tankers, like maybe had fuel or water in them. There was
-just—everywhere you looked there was military.
-
-Q: A major recovery operation?
-
-A: Yes, it looked like an invasion force. It really did.
-
-And they were all wearing these light khaki uniforms. They didn’t look
-like, you know, olive drabs. They were light khaki and they all had the
-same patch over their—that kind of blue funny patch with the circles on
-it, was on his shoulder.
-
-And a lot...
-
-Q: Do you have a clue as to where they came from? Did your brother or
-your uncle?
-
-A: No. I don’t know where they came from. No, I don’t think anybody
-ever ascertained that.
-
-There were a lot of MP patches and some of them were wearing
-nightsticks off of these webbed utility belts. They had night sticks
-and they had .45’s in holsters, you know, the automatics, full
-holsters. And these were the people that were giving most of the orders.
-
-They had the road barricaded off out there and we sat there for a very
-long time and, you know, we were getting thirsty and everything and we
-asked if we could go back to Horse Springs to get some water.
-
-“Oh, no, no. You can’t through there.”
-
-And right after that, they said, “Now you just turn around and you head
-out of here now and you go to Socorro,” and this is the redhead again,
-“Keep your mouths shut. Just keep going and don’t look back.”
-
-Well, as we drove away, you know, dad, “The hell with it, we’ll go to
-Magdalena. We’ll get water in Magdalena.” You know, because that’s
-where John Trujillo lived, a relative of Ted’s.
-
-And so as we drove away, I was looking out the back window and I could
-see Dr. Buskirk and these kids and that guy, the guy in the pick-up was
-standing there and this Dr. Buskirk was doing just like this in this
-redheaded officer’s face and he kept pointing back behind him and I
-guess that meant, you know, we’ve got to go back that way and he was
-fed up with this guy or something and he was shaking his finger in his
-face when they were yelling at each other and that’s pretty much the
-last I saw of the whole situation. I don’t know what happened after
-that because we just kept going.
-
- (END)
-
-
- Transcript of Interview with
- W. Glenn Dennis[*]
- (Alleged firsthand witness to
- events at the Roswell AAF hospital)
-
- [*] W. Glenn Dennis, interview with Karl T. Pflock, November 2,
- 1992.
-
-Q: You started getting calls from the base mortuary officer is that
-right, some time in the afternoon on some day in July [1947].
-
-A: Right after noon, yeah.
-
-Q: Do you recall, was that before the story appeared in the [Roswell
-Daily] Record?
-
-A: I don’t know. I’m sure it was. I can’t honestly say, but I don’t
-think the paper came out until the next day, I don’t think. I’m just
-assuming that.
-
-Q: I understand. When things like that happen to me way after the fact
-I try to remember, and I wasn’t sure if you had any recollection or
-not. It was the base mortuary officer who called you, not any of the
-MDs out there.
-
-A: No.
-
-Q: He was just, the mortuary officer was just the guy...
-
-A: We used to have a standing joke. What did you do that was so bad
-they made you the mortuary officer.
-
-Q: Exactly.
-
-A: He wasn’t a doctor or anything, but he was an officer and he was
-probably some old boy they was trying to figure out something to do
-with.
-
-We used to all have them come in, even the officer himself, say, “God,
-I didn’t know I screwed up that bad.”
-
-Q: Was this a guy you’d worked with before? Somebody you knew real well?
-
-A: No. Those guys come and go.
-
-Q: I realize that. You don’t remember what his name was or anything
-like that?
-
-A: No. I’m like Bob [Shirkey]. I think if I would see it or heard it
-or something I might. Those guys, they were in and out. The mortuary
-officer, usually they would appoint some sergeant or somebody. The
-only time the doctors were involved is when you’d have an embalming
-inspection or dress inspection where the doctors came in and examined
-the body to make sure everything was right. You had another inspection
-to make sure their dog tags, make sure all the medals and everything...
-
-They always had two crews of inspectors. The doctors were only involved
-in the cause of death or the autopsies or identification process,
-dental charts and all that. After they did their work, then a doctor
-would always come in and make sure the body was embalmed because [they]
-know more about it than the other people. But they were involved
-before. You know.
-
-Q: The reason they contacted you was because Burt Ballard’s funeral
-home up here had a contract with the base, right?
-
-A: Yeah.
-
-Q: You worked for Burt for a lot of years, didn’t you?
-
-A: Yeah, a long time.
-
-Q: When did you first go to work for him?
-
-A: I went to work for him, I was hanging around the funeral home when
-I was like a freshman in high school. I’d want to make some extra
-money. “I’ll give you 50 cents to wash the hearse.” I knew his daughter
-real well. We were all in school together. That’s where I really got
-involved in the funeral home. I just kind of worked my way in it.
-
-Q: He basically taught you the trade and all that.
-
-A: Oh, yeah. My folks weren’t in the funeral business.
-
-Q: The reason I was curious about it was because when I went back...
-I’m one of these guys that goes to Washington and then gets fed up
-and leaves and swears I’m never going to go back, and then I go
-back anyway. But the last time I went back and did that, I shared a
-townhouse with a guy for awhile who was a mortician from Michigan. But
-he had to go through all this formal training and all this rigmarole...
-
-A: No. That started in (inaudible). Maybe you don’t want to hear
-this, but I was in the 9th grade, and this teacher was going around
-and wanted us to write a composition on what we wanted to be when we
-graduated from school. What were our future plans. I was kind of a wise
-guy, I guess I must have been, but I said undertaker, and I don’t even
-know why. All the girls squealed, so I got a little attention. Then
-she said okay, if that’s what you want to do then you’ve got a week,
-you bring me your composition. I want to know why you want to be an
-undertaker.
-
-So I went to the funeral home. They didn’t have any books in those days
-or anything, but that’s where I went. That’s why I got involved in it,
-started.
-
-Q: How long were you in that business before you... I know you ran the
-Wortley Hotel up in Lincoln [N.M.].
-
-A: Oh, that was after I retired.
-
-Q: Oh, I see, you retired from the mortuary business...
-
-A: Oh, yeah. I was in the funeral business 33 years.
-
-Q: All the time with Ballard?
-
-A: Oh no, I had my own funeral home over in Las Cruces [N.M.], and one
-in Socorro [N.M.].
-
-Q: Oh, okay.
-
-Speaking of that, do you know Norman Todd or his family?
-
-A: His dad and I took the state board together. He was at Clovis
-[N.M.]. Norman’s his son isn’t it?
-
-Q: Yeah. He’s a lawyer over in Las Cruces [N.M.]. His...
-
-A: Wasn’t his dad the funeral director in Clovis [N.M.]?
-
-Q: I think so. The reason I know him is because Mike Cook, who is Steve
-Schiff’s press secretary, and he have been friends ever since they were
-in kindergarten together. It turns out that Iris Todd, I guess his
-stepmother, is the niece of Loretta Proctor. So talk about small world.
-
-You got these calls from the mortuary officer who was asking you all
-these questions. We don’t have to go back through all of this. Then at
-some point you decided to go out to the base. What took you to the base?
-
-A: At some point I didn’t decide, that’s not correct. Somebody wrote
-that, but I don’t think it’s right. The way I ended up out at the base
-later, we had the ambulance service. The way I got it, the ambulance
-service, I got a call, was an airman that was hurt. I took him to the
-base. The best I remember, he wasn’t on a stretcher or anything because
-we walked up the ramp and he sat up in the front seat with me. So he
-weren’t real bad and weren’t dying. Anyway... This guy walked in, I
-walked him in. Where I usually park the ambulance, there was a field
-ambulance there. I had to go back up to the front. The airman and I
-walked up the ramps. That’s why I went to the base.
-
-Q: The hospital in those days was apparently a complex of buildings,
-right?
-
-A: Yeah. Kind of like Bob [Shirkey] said, like the officer’s club.
-They’re all wooden barrack types.
-
-Q: So the building that’s out there now, the rehab center is a
-completely new building and had nothing to do with that.
-
-A2 [Bob Shirkey]: No. Think of a long walkway, like a tunnel, attached
-to the front of a series of...
-
-Q: I know just what you’re talking about.
-
-A: ...with a little of breezeway between each building, the best I
-remember it. Isn’t that right. Bob?
-
-A2 [Bob Shirkey]: Yeah. Here was the building and you came out the
-front door and you went down this walkway, which I just said, like a
-tunnel. You could see from one end to the other, but all these separate
-buildings which were different wings of the hospital.
-
-Q: This was the infirmary where you took the airman, right?
-
-A: There were some ramps there, I think the old ramp’s still there. It
-was. Anyway, that’s the kind of buildings they were. You don’t see it
-today, no.
-
-Q: I knew that the building, most of it, was new, but I wasn’t sure if
-they’d built onto it...
-
-A: That had been worked over two or three times.
-
-Q: When you look at it looks like it’s been one of these things where
-they’ve added things to it.
-
-So you pulled around behind the infirmary, basically.
-
-A: It was a pretty tight squeeze in there. You couldn’t get very many
-cars in there.
-
-Q: How many of those ambulances were back there?
-
-A: There were three old box ambulances. I call them box ambulance. I
-guess you call them... I wasn’t in the military so I don’t know what
-all the terms were.
-
-Q: Like these old field ambulances.
-
-A: They’ve got the old square field ambulances, you know.
-
-Q: The airman walked up that ramp with you. Both of you guys went
-into...
-
-A: The airman and I both went in.
-
-Q: Did he see that stuff in...
-
-A: He wasn’t paying any attention because he had, I had a tourniquet
-and towel over his busted nose, and he went right on in.
-
-Q: Got himself into a little trouble in town, did he?
-
-A: Rode an old motorcycle. The reason I remember it is because he had
-an old Indian motorcycle, and I’d just bought one. I paid $40 for one
-and he [rode] one, and I didn’t have any fenders, and I was thinking of
-maybe of...
-
-Q: So you took him in there, and then basically after you got him taken
-care of you figured you’d go look up your friend, the nurse.
-
-Let’s get that straight.
-
-A: Stan Friedman, I think, somebody thought that I was having a
-relationship with this nurse. I was not. This girl wouldn’t even think
-about going with me, and she was going strictly, when she got her
-time paid back to the service she was going into an order of the nuns,
-sisters, and she was going to be in education and later on she changed
-to the nursing deal. The only reason she was in it, because her folks
-were in debt and she went in the service to get her education. She got
-her education and then she was going to pay back the church what they
-owed her. Her whole thing in life was, from the day she was born, her
-life was planned that she was going to be in an order.
-
-Q: Did she ever tell you which order that was?
-
-A: It was in St. Paul, Minnesota. That’s all I know.
-
-Q: That’s where she was from.
-
-A: That’s where she was born and raised. She never went out of the city
-until she went to... My understanding was she never went anywhere and
-she never lived anywhere. She was raised up from the time... Strictly
-raised by the church. That was the only life she ever planned. She
-wouldn’t date a man if her life depended on it. She’d get around and
-talk and everything, but there was no way. But everybody said I was
-going to marry her and... That’s bull shit.
-
-Q: The implication was that she was cute and...
-
-A: She was cute. I could have been interested. If I wouldn’t have
-played second fiddle to the Catholic church, because that’s what she
-would have been.
-
-Q: How did you get to know her, just being out there on the base?
-
-A: The ambulance service. You go out there, and you’ve got your splints
-on a guy, you’ve got first aid, whatever, you can’t just throw them off
-of your stretcher. You maybe help them... Sometimes you’re out there
-two hours or three. Then while you’re waiting to get your equipment
-back you sit in the coat room with the doctors and with the nurse’s
-quarters. That’s where we always had our cokes and stuff.
-
-Q: So you’d just shoot the breeze with whoever’s around.
-
-A: You get to know these people. That’s the only way. See, she’d only
-been there less than three months. Of course, I’m a crazy son of a
-gun... Nearly everybody remembered her. She was a good looking little
-thing, a beautiful little girl. We thought she was kind of lonely.
-
-Q: As you well know, there’s been a major effort to try to find her.
-
-[Skip in tape]
-
-A: She was out here less than three months.
-
-Q: So you went back there. Tell me what happened.
-
-A: I started back there, and that’s when I got in trouble. I saw this
-officer standing there, and I saw this debris in the back of the
-ambulance. Two of them was full of debris. Like Bob [Shirkey] saw a
-bunch little stuff, and there was a couple of pretty good sized.
-
-Q: Two of the three ambulances had stuff...
-
-A: One of them’s door was closed, but the other two... There was two
-MPs standing right out, kind of just leaning up against the back of
-those. I remember.
-
-Q: Did they challenge you when you tried to go in?
-
-A: No... Evidently because I drove up with that airman, and they just
-figured whatever.
-
-Another thing, when I was there, all the people that was there, that
-nurse was the only person I saw that was permanent station. Everybody
-else was all new in that whole hospital operation. Even in the coke
-room, there wasn’t anybody in there that I knew. I started back and got
-to the door, and I saw this...
-
-(Pause)
-
-We’ve been friends for years, but I don’t want to talk with him around.
-
-Q: So the stuff you saw, you said it was not aluminum...
-
-A: ...looked like hot stainless steel when it got hot. When you put
-flame on stainless, see, I do sculpture work and all that, and I know
-what the stuff looks like.
-
-Q: Oh, you’re a sculpture? I didn’t know that?
-
-A: Yeah, I’ve been doing it for years. I had my own foundry... I did. I
-don’t do it any more. I have my stuff done. But anyway, this stuff was
-a blue purplish, it looked like hot stainless steel, is what it looked
-like. Steel that got hot. It didn’t look like aluminum, it wasn’t even
-melted like aluminum. I don’t even think it was melted, just like a
-bunch of fragments.
-
-Q: But there were some bigger things in there besides the fragments,
-right?
-
-A: Yeah. There were was two pieces.
-
-Anyway, do you want to go back to the nurse?
-
-Q: Yes, please.
-
-A: I started back, see, and this captain was standing there, and
-naturally, I just thought we had a plane crash. When we had that,
-we used to fill up the ambulances and everything else. It would
-(inaudible) for you to have a hand here or an arm or a foot or
-something. You know what I’m talking about. Then you’ve got to get
-in and take all that stuff and separate it and put those bodies back
-together with identification. That’s what you’ve got to do. I thought
-we had a crash.
-
-I saw this guy, I didn’t know him. He was standing there at the door.
-
-Q: Just inside?
-
-A: Just kind of standing like in between the door of this room up
-there. I was going down the hall. I said, “Sir, it looks like we had a
-plane crash. Do I need to go in and get ready for it?”
-
-Q: This was an officer?
-
-A: Yeah, he was a captain. I remember the bars on his [inaudible]. He
-said, “Who are you?” I told him I was from the funeral home, and he
-said, “Wait right there, don’t move.”
-
-Then he came back, that’s when the two MPs came up. When the nurse came
-out, we started down the hall and that’s when somebody in the back of
-us said, “Bring that son of a bitch back.” That’s when the redheaded
-captain asked where the sergeant came in right there. Then they took me
-on out. As I was going down the hall, she came out of, like Bob said,
-out of this room, and there was two guys in back of her, and they all
-had towels over their face.
-
-She saw me and she said, “Glenn, what are you doing here? Get out of
-here, you’re going to get in a lot of trouble. How did you get in
-here?” She said that two or three times. She was sick.
-
-Q: This is when you were talking to that first officer?
-
-A: Yeah. He just told the MPs to take me back to the funeral home.
-
-Q: He had just told them that, and then she appeared at that point?
-
-A: He told them to take me to the funeral home, and we started down the
-hall, back out the hall, and that’s when she came out of another room
-with these other two guys. What happened, she told me the next day,
-they were all sick because those little bodies were in those sacks, and
-two of them were very mangled and the smell was horrible and one was
-whole and two of them were very badly mangled.
-
-Q: Did you get a whiff of that stuff yourself?
-
-A: No, evidently not. If I would have, I would have known what it was.
-I worked on a hell of a lot of stuff.
-
-Q: In that tape you talked about working on floaters and all that kind
-of stuff.
-
-A: You know.
-
-Q: I haven’t had professional experience in it, but I’ve been involved
-in it.
-
-A: In New Mexico you’ve got this hot 100 degree stuff, and you’ve got
-bodies out there two or three days, and (inaudible).
-
-Q: This red headed guy, what was his rank, do you remember?
-
-A: I think he was a captain. It seemed to me like he had on some bars.
-
-Q: When he first appeared and started getting, essentially, pretty
-rough, was the sergeant around at that time, or did he show up...
-
-A: He was kind of beside of him. I think they were standing there....
-Yeah, they were definitely standing there together. I don’t know if
-they walked in together, because I didn’t see them until they turned me
-around.
-
-Q: Was there a lot of activity at that time? Were there people...
-
-A: People were [fastened] everywhere. And the odd part of it was, there
-wasn’t anybody, wasn’t any of our regular people. These were all people
-that I’d never seen before. That’s why I got in so much trouble. I’d
-never seen these guys.
-
-Q: These were not any of the guys that would ordinarily recognize you
-as somebody who would...
-
-A: And they sure as hell didn’t want me there, you know that.
-
-Q: When he says, “Get him out of there,” the redhead, did he make any
-threats to you himself? Did he say, “Don’t say anything about this,
-forget it...”
-
-A: He said, just like that. He says, “Now listen, Mister, you don’t
-go back into town starting a bunch of damn rumors.” This guy swore as
-much as I do. Anyway, he said, “Don’t start a bunch of damn rumors,
-because nothing happened out here. There’s no plane crashes. Nothing’s
-happened. You don’t go in and start.” Then he told the MPs, “Get the
-son of a bitch out of here.”
-
-That’s when I said, right then, I said, “Look, Mister, I’m a civilian,
-and you can’t do a damn thing to me, you go to hell.” That’s when he
-said, “Listen, Mister, somebody will be picking your bones out of the
-sand.”
-
-Then the black sergeant said, “Sir, he would make good dog food,” or
-something like that. I remember the dog food.
-
-The next morning at 6:00 o’clock the sheriff was out at my dad’s house
-and told my dad, “Glenn may be in a lot of trouble with the base, and
-tell him to keep his mouth shut.”
-
-I never told my story to anybody, but my dad came up, I was living in a
-room at the funeral home. He came up and got me out of bed and wanted
-to know what I’d done. He was a very patriotic old man, and he said,
-“If you done anything against our government, I’ll take care of it.”
-
-Q: When was this?
-
-A: The next morning.
-
-Q: You were saying what the heck? What’s going on?
-
-A: Yeah. I said, well hey... He said, George Wilcox—the sheriff and my
-dad were real good friends, and he said George tells me you’re in a lot
-of trouble out there. He wasn’t going to leave, and I told my dad the
-story. He got all upset because they threatened me and all this kind of
-stuff.
-
-I didn’t see the nurse, then, until the next day. After I saw her, then
-I kept calling. When I got back to the funeral home I started calling,
-because she was in trouble and so was I.
-
-Q: It was the next morning after you’d been hustled out of there that
-your dad came by to see you.
-
-A: Yeah, 6:00 o’clock in the morning.
-
-Q: He’d been called by the sheriff...
-
-A: The sheriff went to my mother and dad’s house, and at 6:00
-o’clock... My dad always got up early, sat and had coffee. He was an
-old carpenter and building contractor. He and George were old friends
-because he used to go hunting, and dad was making gun stocks, so they
-were good friends. They used to play some kind of domino games or 42,
-whatever you call it. They were good friends.
-
-Q: So the sheriff went by to see your dad...
-
-A: Dad said he was there at 6:00 o’clock.
-
-Q: The sheriff came by early in the morning and then your dad
-immediately came from home and came to see you.
-
-A: After George Wilcox left, my dad came up to the funeral home and
-wanted to know what I did.
-
-Q: Did your dad say why the sheriff... Had the sheriff been contacted
-by the base, or...
-
-A: No, he just said, he was concerned about what I’d done, how I’d got
-in trouble.
-
-Q: Do you remember what he told you about what Wilcox told him?
-
-A: He just said George said I was in trouble at the base, and what did
-I do.
-
-Q: Then after having this rude awakening, you then... Did you call the
-nurse?
-
-A: Well, yeah, this was in mid-morning. I remember I finally, I waited
-until kind of, well, it must have been 9:00 o’clock or so, and I
-called. I knew the work station that she always worked at. She was a
-general nurse. They didn’t specialize. Just orderlies and everybody was
-on general duty in those days. I was informed that she wasn’t there,
-she wasn’t working. She wasn’t working that day.
-
-Q: It was one of the other nurses that you talked to?
-
-A: Yeah, it was an old girl by the name of Wilson, Captain Wilson. I
-asked her, I said “what happened?” She said, “Glenn, I don’t know what
-happened, but she’s not on duty. I’ll try to get the word to her that
-you want to talk to her.” She was wanting to talk to me, but she was
-sick. She was in total shock.
-
-Q: Did she tell you that later, that she was sick?
-
-A: I knew she was sick. She came out with that towel. She said, she and
-the two doctors were sick. Then at the Officers’ Club, she said I want
-to know what happened to you, and I’ll tell you what happened to me.
-The only way we ever got to the Officers’ Club, the old regular group
-said you don’t go anywhere, you keep your mouth shut, [inaudible] said
-that. The old group, they would have known us. It probably wouldn’t
-have mattered. But these people, hell, these people didn’t know us.
-And of course I had a pass, and I had an associate membership to the
-Officers’ Club, the funeral home did, so I could go as I pleased. I had
-free access to the base.
-
-Q: Did you meet her at the club?
-
-A: She said she’d meet me over there. She was sick. She said I’ll meet
-you there.
-
-Q: When you got there, she was at the club?
-
-A: She was walking up when I drove up. She walked over. It wasn’t very
-far from the hospital.
-
-Q: She walked from the hospital or...
-
-A: From the nurse’s quarters.
-
-Q: Let me back up to the event with the MPs. They physically hustled
-you out of the hospital...
-
-A: Well, they didn’t carry me out, they said, “Come on, we’re taking
-you back,” one on each side. They didn’t have their hands on me or
-forcing me.
-
-Q: I’ve forgotten which one of the accounts has them lifting you right
-off your feet and all that kind of stuff.
-
-A: No. They may have got me by the elbow, but that was that. They were
-nice guys. They were doing what they were told to do.
-
-Q: They got you to the ambulance. Did they follow you back to the
-funeral home?
-
-A: One followed me in a pickup and the other one sat in the seat with
-me.
-
-Q: Oh, I see, he actually rode with you in the ambulance.
-
-A: He rode with me, and the other one drove a pickup and picked him up.
-They had a pickup.
-
-Q: Did the guy riding with you say anything about what was going on?
-
-A: He said he didn’t know what was going on. That was the first thing I
-said, “What in the hell’s going on?” You know. He said, “You know more
-about it than we do,” something similar to that. I don’t know the exact
-words, but he didn’t know anything.
-
-Q: Now we’re back to the Officers’ Club and you met her there. When you
-saw her, how did she look?
-
-A: Like a nervous wreck. Her hair wasn’t combed or nothing. She said
-she’d been sick all night crying and everything else, and she was still
-crying. She was hysterical. She put her hands over her face and said
-I can’t believe it. The most horrible thing she’d ever seen. She was
-really in bad shape.
-
-Q: You called her and wanted to get in touch with her to talk with her
-about what happened.
-
-A: I was curious.
-
-Q: Did she seem reluctant at first to talk to you about it?
-
-A: No, she said I’ve got to talk to you. I want to know what happened
-to you. She said I’ve got to talk to somebody, and that was it. You
-know, I’d see her a lot. I knew all those old girls out there, you know.
-
-Q: Did she give you any indication or any reason to believe that she
-had been told to keep her mouth shut about it, or...
-
-A: Well, yeah, because I’ll tell you what. She had this drawing on the
-back of a prescription pad, these little bodies, it was on the back,
-a little small thing on the back of a prescription pad. She said,
-“I’m going to show you something, and you have to give me your sacred
-oath that you won’t tell anybody when you got this and you won’t ever
-mention my name, because I will get in a lot of trouble.” That’s what
-she said. “I will get in a lot of trouble.”
-
-Q: She didn’t say specifically that somebody had...
-
-A: No, she just said, “I will get in a lot of trouble.” She said, “Will
-you do that?” I said, “Sure.”
-
-She showed me that. And she had it written on the back like I had it on
-the back of that, you have my drawing, where I said note, and all that.
-That’s what she said.
-
-Q: She let you keep that, she gave it to you?
-
-A: Yeah, she said you look at it and you throw it away. I never did. I
-went and took it back and put it in my personal file.
-
-Q: Which subsequently got tossed, apparently.
-
-A: Well, all the files got tossed.
-
-Q: What happened?
-
-A: Well, the funeral home, I hired some guys, the manager up there
-now [was there] before I left, and Raymond said that he doesn’t know,
-because when he was working up there was another manager, and he
-said he thought Joe [Lucas] told (inaudible). Of course Joe and I
-weren’t very good friends and we’d had some problems over the funeral
-business, and he said Joe found my files. He said I know he went
-through everything you had.
-
-He and I had a partnership in a business, and I put up all the money
-and it went sour and so we had problems.
-
-Q: You and Stan Friedman actually made an effort to try and find that,
-didn’t you?
-
-A: We went down there. The old file was right where I said it was, it
-was still there. But it was, Stan will tell you, we went down in this
-old basement, and I knew exactly... See, I kept files on every case
-that I was involved in, murders, anything that I went to court on, that
-I was a witness on, I kept all that. I called those my personal files.
-If I ever had to go back with the insurance companies or anything, I
-had it all right there. That’s why I had those.
-
-Q: You found the filing cabinet but there was nothing in it?
-
-A: No. We went through it. There wasn’t a thing in it. Stan and I both.
-
-Q: They’d stripped it out, or was there other stuff in there...
-
-A: There wasn’t anything in there.
-
-Q: After all of that excitement, then what? Did it just kind of
-evaporate?
-
-A: It just kind of evaporated. Then of course two or three days later,
-I was concerned about her because she was sick. I took her back to the
-nurse’s quarters and let her out. I called back the next day and they
-said she wasn’t on duty, and I called the next day and they said she
-wasn’t on duty. Then I went out there, for some reason, I don’t recall.
-I went out there and I asked about the lieutenant, and they said she’d
-been transferred out. They said, “She was transferred out yesterday.”
-Well, that was the day after I saw her. They got her out the next day.
-
-Q: Who told you she’d been transferred out?
-
-A: I don’t know. Some nurses...
-
-Q: It wasn’t anybody that you remember?
-
-A: No.
-
-Q: Did they tell you where she’d been shipped to?
-
-A: They didn’t know. They said she had been transferred, and that’s all
-they knew.
-
-Q: But then you heard from her subsequently.
-
-A: About three or four weeks later. I got a card addressed to Ballard
-Funeral Home. It was from her, and inside it just said, just a short
-note, she said we will correspond later to see what happened to each
-other, something similar to those words. She said the only way you can
-contact me is through this APO number, and there was an APO number. It
-was a New York APO number.
-
-Q: So she’d gone to Europe or some place.
-
-A: Then right on the bottom she says, “I’m in London.” That was it. I
-wrote a note, just a note, that said if you feel like it and you get
-time, then I would love to know and we’ll correspond. Mine came back.
-That was about three or four weeks later. Mine came back.
-
-Q: That was the one that was marked deceased?
-
-A: Yes. It said return to sender, [addressee] deceased.
-
-Q: Then what did you do?
-
-A: (inaudible)
-
-Q: You didn’t try to follow up or see if there was any possible...
-
-A: No. I asked (inaudible), at the time we called her Slatts Wilson,
-a big tall nurse, 6′2″, 6′3″, big tall skinny girl. We called her
-Slatts. Everybody called her Slatts. She’s the one that told me she’d
-heard that there was a plane crash and she was the nurse that went down
-on a training mission. She said that’s strictly rumor, I don’t know
-anything about it. That’s what I...
-
-Q: No one’s been able to turn that one up at all.
-
-A: I guess maybe I should never even mention this. I know no one
-believes this damn story. Nobody believes this story.
-
-Q: I don’t know if that’s true.
-
-A: Anyway, it was a hell of a story. I told (inaudible). I said I told
-the woman, I don’t want to give you her name, because I told the lady
-I’d give a sacred oath and I didn’t want to get involved. Well, it’s
-been 45 years, almost 40 years, and I haven’t heard anything. He said
-I will do it confidentially and nobody else will have this name. Well,
-that’s where he broke his promise after that. I got all over him about
-it. I called him and I was madder than hell. He said well, Bob Shirkey
-was the one that told everybody, that he was sitting in the back of
-us. Bob brought Stan [Friedman] up there when he interviewed me. He
-said, Bob Shirkey was the one that let out her name. To this day, Stan
-Friedman (inaudible) still says he did not put her name out. I’ve been
-on several shows, not several, but two or three interviews, and I’m not
-going to mention her name. If somebody says is this her name? I’m not
-going to say it is or it isn’t. I told Stan ... I was madder than hell
-about it, because I did give my word.
-
-Q: There’s another side to that, too, from the standpoint of those
-who are trying to get some answers. By not having her name around,
-it makes it easier to cross-check the stories that you get from
-people. You have... It’s a question of honor, and that’s very sound. I
-applaud you for that. There’s not too many people around these days
-that are concerned about that kind of thing. And it’s also, from an
-investigator’s point of view, an advantage, too.
-
-A: I’ve never read this stuff, I’ve never watched the videos, I’ve
-never read any books, I haven’t even read Stan’s books, I haven’t even
-read [Kevin] Randle’s only what they say about me. Friedman is a lot
-more accurate, but see...
-
-Q: You mean about...
-
-A: About me. I’ve read that. That’s the only thing I’ve read. I’m
-not a UFO guy. I’ve got another life besides UFOs. But anyway, Stan
-Friedman’s story is pretty well right. But Randle and them was always
-said I got curious. I didn’t get curious. I went out there on a call,
-just like I told you.
-
-Q: The section of their book that refers to you is really kind of
-cryptic, anyway.
-
-A: They said the book was already published. Now they had a copy...
-Friedman sent them a copy of my tape. They had the (inaudible). Hell,
-they had my tape. They just made that up. Somebody did.
-
-Q: I was puzzled by it when I read their book. That whole section where
-they refer to you, and it’s all very mysterious, and your name is not
-referred to in the table of contents, but you’re in the list of people
-that’s been interviewed, but you’re not one of the key people lists...
-
-A: They never did interview me.
-
-Q: They never talk to you at all?
-
-A: Not personally. They didn’t interview me until a long time later, a
-year or so later. They only had Stan’s tape.
-
-Q: So when they were actually writing their book...
-
-A: The book was already published.
-
-Q: When they were doing the writing, they were working from Stan’s tape.
-
-A: Evidently.
-
-Q: Who was actually the first UFO investigator to get in touch with you?
-
-A: Stan Friedman. When they had Unsolved Mysteries here and different
-ones. There was a lot of people... I’d get different ones. I had
-different people come and say we want to talk to you about the UFOs,
-and I said I don’t have anything to say, I don’t want to talk about it,
-and I never did. I’ve talked to very few people since.
-
-Q: How did Stan come to find you?
-
-A: One of the guys that I went to school with, high school, and Captain
-Harry Blake, he’s a general now, (inaudible).
-
-Q: Is he still on active duty?
-
-A: No, he’s retired. He was just a general in the military school,
-National Guard, I don’t know. He never was really a good friend of
-mine. We lived across the street from each other when we were kids.
-
-Q: So that’s how Stan found you. He was the first guy to talk to you.
-
-A: Bob Shirkey brought him up there to see me.
-
-(Pause)
-
-Q: There’s a reference in here to you having some years later, I think,
-talked to a pediatrician that you knew? A guy that was stationed...
-
-A: I can’t find his picture, and I don’t remember his name. I ran into
-him when I was fishing up in Colorado and we ran into each other.
-
-Q: This was a guy who was at that time stationed here?
-
-A: He was here, and they called him in. He said that was out of his
-field and he didn’t want anything to do with it.
-
-Q: They actually called him in and asked him to take a look at what had
-been retrieved or...
-
-A: He said they called him in. I don’t know. He said, “But I said that
-was out of my field and I didn’t want anything to do with it.” That’s
-what he told me, now.
-
-Q: Did you get the sense that he knew more than he was telling?
-
-A: I would say so, yeah. I’m sure they did. A lot of those guys out
-there did.
-
-Q: You don’t remember his name?
-
-A: I don’t remember it. But I did run into him. Somewhere I’ve got his
-name.
-
-Q: Have you talked with anyone else? Had you during that time before
-you got into all this...
-
-A: No, I wouldn’t have even talked to him about it. He brought it up
-and wanted to know whatever happened on the UFO business.
-
-Q: It was at his initiative.
-
-A: I didn’t bring it up. I told him I didn’t know any more about it
-than he did. He said well that was strictly out of my field, and I
-didn’t want to get involved in it. That was about it. But he brought it
-up. I didn’t ask him.
-
-Q: He was just curious about what happened.
-
-A: Wanted to know whatever happened to it.
-
-Q: That’s about all I’ve got.
-
- (END)
-
-
- Transcript of Interview with Alice Knight[*]
- (Alleged secondhand witness to
- “crash site”
- 175 miles northwest of Roswell)
-
- [*] Excerpted from raw footage used to prepare the video,
- _Recollections of Roswell Part II_, (Washington, D.C.: Fund for UFO
- Research, 1993).
-
-A: I remember that he saw—one time I went to visit—and I don’t remember
-whether it was before my husband and I married or after, I don’t recall
-the date. But he said that he saw a UFO fall. He was out working in the
-field and I understood that he was out on the St. Agustin Plains and he
-went over that way and it fell and he got nearly to the site and there
-was a group of people on a geological—archeological hunt and they were
-over there. I don’t remember how many people he said.
-
-But they got nearly up to the UFO but it was close enough that you
-could see some creatures. He said they didn’t look like human beings
-out there.
-
-And along came government cars and trucks...
-
-Q: Now, by government you mean...
-
-A: I guess it was government. You know, as I said it was a long time
-ago. And someone came along and I understood it, I don’t know whether
-it was army or what. I think he just termed it government trucks and
-they told him to go on back and forget they ever saw anything, and
-that’s all I recall.
-
- (END)
-
-
- Transcript of Interview with Vern Maltais[*]
- (Alleged secondhand witness to
- “crash site”
- 175 miles northwest of Roswell)
-
- [*] Excerpted from raw footage used to prepare the video.
- _Recollections of Roswell Part II_, (Washington, D.C.: Fund for UFO
- Research, 1993).
-
-A: ...he [the eyewitness] had been coming back from one of his field
-trips, he’d run onto a flying saucer that had burst open and there
-were four beings on the ground and that he was surveying the site,
-archeological group from the University of Pennsylvania, telling us
-that there were about four or five people with this group.
-
-As they were just starting to look things over really closely, the
-military moved in and gave them a briefing not to say anything about it
-and keep quiet and it was in the national interest to get out of there.
-
-Q: What was his feeling about what it was that he had experienced?
-
-A: He had no qualms about what it was. He said it was a vehicle from
-outer space. There wasn’t any question. The beings on there were
-nothing like, not exactly like human beings....
-
-Q: How did you...
-
-A: ...similar but not exactly.
-
-Q: How did he describe them?
-
-A: He described them being about three and a half to four feet tall,
-very slim in stature, and with—their heads were hairless, with no
-eyebrows, no eyelashes, no hair. Sort of a pear-shaped head with the
-top of the head being smaller—larger, I mean.
-
-Q: Any other characteristics about their appearance?
-
-A: Only one thing that he mentioned. The hands were not covered, they
-had four fingers.
-
- (END)
-
-
- Transcript of Interview with
- James Ragsdale[*]
- (Alleged firsthand witness to
- “crash site” north of Roswell)
-
- [*] James Ragsdale, interview with Donald R. Schmitt, January 26,
- 1993.
-
- RAGSDALE, JAMES EYEWITNESS Transcript
- 26 JANUARY 1993
-
-DS: So you were actually out there.
-
-JR: Yeah.
-
-DS: Do you remember the name of the ranch it was on?”
-
-JR: It was on ... Fisher?
-
-DS: Was it north of here.
-
-JR: Yes ... back out here.
-
-DS: Northwest ... Just take your time.
-
-JR: It was Foster. (Some discussion with his wife about who owned the
-ranch) ... Let me see what you’ve got (referring to the photographs).
-That’s the place right there (identifying the location from the
-pictures).
-
-DS: What area?
-
-JR: It seemed to me that that place belonged to ... Fisher, but it sold
-to somebody else ... somebody else bought that... That’s how come I was
-out in that area. And we was out there and she’s dead and all the guys
-I showed the stuff are all dead. It’s amazing what all went on...
-
-Discuss our book and the Museum.
-
-DS: showing one of the pictures ... so you think this looks like
-
-JR: That looks like the place.
-
-DS: As far as the ranches go, driving around at that time, it could
-have been most any ranch, right? This would have been in '47 ... You
-were with this woman?
-
-JR: Yeah. We were camped out out there.
-
-DS: You were camping?
-
-JR: Yeah... I would say half of it ... I would say that only about
-half of it ... just half of a ... you really couldn’t tell what it
-was ... what you could still see, where it hit ... I think it was two
-spaceships flying together and one them came down and the other one
-picked up what they could and got out of there.
-
-DS: Is it possible that because it was hit by lightning that it broke
-up and part of it went down ... (discussion of the Mac Brazel sighting)
-
-JR: ... but it was either dummies or bodies or something laying there.
-They looked like bodies. They weren’t very long ... over four or five
-foot long at the most. We didn’t see their faces or nothing like that
-but we had just got to the site and heard the army, the sirens, all
-coming and we got into a damned jeep to take off. We had to hold a
-fence up to go onto another ranch to come out from there.
-
-DS: How far would you say this from town here?
-
-JR: Thirty miles ... forty miles.
-
-DS: In a northwesterly direction?
-
-JR: Right up here. (Discuss the pictures again.)
-
-DS: Were there any buildings?
-
-JR: No. You couldn’t see nothing. You go up on top of the hill. It was
-a hill ... (referring to the pictures) you could see the stuff right
-here.
-
-DS: The object ... the craft ... what was left of it ... in these
-photos ... where was the object?
-
-JR: Along this right here ... It looked to be about half of around (?)
-because around the edges ... I had two great big pieces. That’s what
-they got when they stole the car ... you could take that stuff and wad
-it up and it would straighten itself out. I never seen anything like
-it. Looked like something between a plastic ... looked like carbon
-paper...
-
-DS: That was the color of it?
-
-JR: Yeah. Carbons. That was the color of it. Sure was ... between
-plastic and ... hell I don’t know ... let’s see how to describe. One
-piece we had you could take it and put it in any form you wanted and it
-would stay there ... you could bend it in any form and it would stay
-... it wouldn’t straighten back out.
-
-DS: You picked those up from the ground?
-
-JR: Yeah.
-
-DS: You threw them in the jeep ... stuffed them in your clothes...?
-
-JR: Yeah and then we heard all of them coming...
-
-DS: How many vehicles ... how much commotion did you hear as they came
-in?
-
-JR: Oh my God it must have been ... it was two or three six by six
-army trucks, a wrecker and everything ... and leading the pack was a
-'47 Ford car with guys in it ... MPs and stuff in it ... we had the
-windshield down on the jeep and we stayed in the weeds and stuff ...
-and we came on back down to where we was camped at.
-
-DS: So you watched for a while?
-
-JR: Yeah. Sure did.
-
-DS: What was their...
-
-JR: They cleaned everything all up. I mean cleaned it. They raked the
-ground and everything. I mean they cleaned everything.
-
-DS: You didn’t stay there that long?
-
-JR: No, but they had a truck. I would say it was six or eight big
-trucks besides the pick up, weapons carriers and stuff like that.
-
-DS: What kind of guard did they have. Did they surround certain areas...
-
-JR: They had MPs all ... they got way out in the field. They had people
-all along this ridge ... they drove up in here. We was back over here.
-This grass here...
-
-DS: So if you were back here, could you see the activity down here?
-
-JR: You couldn’t see too much of what they ... you could tell ... As
-soon as they got there they began gathering the stuff up ... we were
-hidden in what you call buffalo grass...
-
-DS: Did you see any behavior around the bodies.
-
-JR: Huh-uh.
-
-DS: You couldn’t see down to that level?
-
-JR: Yeah.
-
-DS: Did you see any activity near the craft?
-
-JR: No.
-
-DS: The angle of the craft ... was it flat was tipped...
-
-JR: One part was kind of buried in the ground ... and part of it was
-sticking out of the ground ... about like that (DS: about a 30 degree
-angle?) Yeah ... and I’m sure that was bodies ... either bodies or
-dummies...
-
-DS: Why do you say “dummies?”
-
-JR: The federal government could have been doing something because they
-didn’t want anyone to know what this was ... they was using dummies in
-those damned things ... they could use remote control.
-
-DS: So you thought that it could have been an experimental craft?
-
-JR: After I came to town showed Frank Willis and his son (he’s dead)
-... the Blue Moon beer joint over on the old Dexter highway. We was
-there until two o’clock in the morning ... I had the jeep behind my car.
-
-DS: Did you still have the scrap in the jeep?
-
-JR: Yeah. I showed it to him. He said I would just keep my mouth shut
-... he said hell there is no telling where that come from.
-
-DS: So you didn’t think it was from outer space?
-
-JR: No. We didn’t even think about outer space back then...
-
-DS: When was the first time that you thought that maybe this was
-something more?
-
-JR: It was about three weeks ... it came out that a spaceship had
-crashed at Roswell ... about three weeks. But it could have been out
-longer than that there but see I worked in Carlsbad...
-
-DS: But you first saw there had been a newspaper article about three
-weeks after...
-
-JR: Oh hell it was two or three weeks before I caught up on it ... a
-spaceship ... what I hear is they guarded that place for a long time
-out there ... because me and another fellow went out there and you
-couldn’t get ... they had the roads sealed off ... it was a month or so
-after...
-
-DS: And they still had it cordoned off.
-
-JR: The MPs and stuff were still on the road. They wouldn’t let nobody
-go out there...
-
-DS: If a person were to drive out there today ... going north out of
-town ... are we talking 285?
-
-JR: No. Highway 48. You go out 48. You go out here to the truck route,
-hit 48 and ... and it’s about forty some miles out in there ... (And no
-talks about the car being stolen in 1951 when the car with the debris
-was stolen...) ...I would say 18 inches and 30 inches long ... strips
-off the edge of it ... it was a heavy material but it didn’t have no
-ridges ... it was put together with some kind of solder like stuff ...
-no bumps, no nothing in it ... it wasn’t ... it was about as heavy as
-duraluminum ... it wasn’t as brittle ... you could take a small piece
-and it was flexible ... (then discuss the stealing of the car with a
-wrecker and the material was locked in the trunk of the car. And then
-discuss the break in of the house where the last of the pieces were
-stolen about eight years ago ... 1985).
-
-DS: Was there a storm that night?”
-
-JR: Yeah. There sure was. It was a whale of a storm.
-
-DS: Did you hear anything unusual? Did you hear ... between the cracks
-of thunder...
-
-JR: Well, it lit up the sky when it came down. It lit up the damned ...
-we thought at first that it was falling star or something. And electric
-lightning ... man it was something.
-
-DS: You heard something and you saw something...
-
-JR: Yeah, sure did ... because we were laying there in the back of the
-pick up ... the whole sky lit up ... we thought it was a star falling.
-
-DS: Did you then go to check it out...
-
-JR: Sure did. The next day, sure did. We drove right up on it. She
-picked up a piece of it and we had the jeep parked a little ways away
-from there and throwed a piece of it up there somewhere and I have
-tried and tried to find where she had throwed that piece ... she had a
-piece but when she saw the army coming she throwed it out ... she saw
-them a coming and she throwed it out ... I doubt that I could even go
-back to the place it’s been so long. (Now begin to talk about the car
-wreck that nearly killed him.)
-
-Remainder of the tape is discussion about the car wreck, the ranchers
-in the area, and the murder of Mrs. Ragsdale’s brother.
-
- (END)
-
-
-
-
- Selected Bibliography of Technical Reports
-
-
-The technical reports listed below are available for sale by contacting:
- National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
- 5285 Port Royal Rd
- Springfield, VA 22161
- (703) 487-4650
- http://www.orders@ntis.fedworld.gov
-
- Publication NTIS Report Number
-
- Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories.
- “Report on Research, for the Period July
- 1965-June 1967”, AFCRL TR-68-0039, 1968. AD 666484
-
- Air Force Missile Development Center.
- _MAN HIGH III_, MDC-TR-60-16, 1960. AD 259635
-
- ——. _MAN-HIGH I_, MDC-TR-59-24, 1959. ADA 215867
-
- Air Research and Development Command.
- _History of Flight Support Holloman Air
- Development Center, 1946–1957_, 1957. ADA 323526
-
- Bartol, Aileen M., et al.. _Advanced Dynamic
- Anthropomorphic Manikin (ADAM) Final
- Design Report_, AAMRL TR-90-023, 1990. AD 234761
-
- Bushnell, David. _Contributions of Balloon
- Operations to Research and Development
- at the Air Force Missile Development Center
- Holloman AFB, N. Mex. 1947–1958_, 1958. ADA 323109
-
- ——. _History of Research in Space Biology
- and Biodynamics at the Air Force Missile
- Development Center, Holloman AFB,
- New Mexico, 1946–1958_, 1958. ADA 323170
-
- ——. _History of Research in Subgravity and
- Zero-G at the Air Force Missile Development
- Center, Holloman AFB, New Mexico,
- 1948–1958_, 1958. ADA 323144
-
- ——. _Major Achievements in Biodynamics:
- Escape Physiology at the Air Force Missile
- Development Center, Holloman AFB,
- New Mexico, 1953–1958_, 1958. ADA 323127
-
- ——. _Origin and Operation of the First
- Holloman Track, 1949–1956_, 1956. ADA 323573
-
- ——. _Research Accomplishments in Biodynamics:
- Deceleration and Impact at the Air Force
- Missile Development Center, Holloman AFB,
- New Mexico, 1955–1958_, 1958. ADA 323097
-
- ——. _The Aeromedical Field Laboratory: Mission,
- Organization, and Track Test Programs,
- 1958–1960_, 1960. ADA 323166
-
- ——. _The Beginnings of Research in Space Biology
- at the Air Force Missile Development Center,
- Holloman AFB, New Mexico, 1946–1952_, 1958. ADA 323167
-
- Cobb, D. B. and Waters, M.H.L. Royal Aircraft
- Establishment Farnborough. _The Behavior
- of Dummy Men During Long Free Falls_,
- Mechanical Engineering Note 179, 1954. AD 060052
-
- Firestone, James R. and Patterson, Jack H.
- _Recovery of Parachute-Borne Packages
- by Helicopter_, TDR 62-6, 1962. AD 276477
-
- Flight Summary, Non-Extensible Balloon
- Operations, 6580th Test Squadron (Special),
- June 1950 to October 1954. ADA 323108
-
- Gildenberg, Bernard G. “General Philosophy and
- Techniques of Balloon Control”, in Lewis A.
- Grass, ed., _Proceedings, Sixth AFCRL Scientific
- Balloon Symposium_, AFCRL-70-0543, 1970. AD 717149
-
- ——. _Capacity and Fatigue Tests on Three Mil
- Polyethylene Balloons_, HADC TN-55-4, 1955. AD 066092
-
- ——. _Crane Launch Techniques for Polyethylene
- Balloons_, HADC TN 57-3, 1957. AD 123732
-
- ——. _Development of Shroud Inflation Techniques
- for Plastic Balloons_, HADC TN-54-4, 1954. AD 039440
-
- ——. _Investigation of Inflation Techniques for
- Nonextensible Balloons_, HADC TN 54-7, 1954. AD 067595
-
- ——. _Meteorological Aspects of Constant-Level
- Balloon Operations in the Southwestern
- United States_, AFCRL-66-706, 1966. AD 644895
-
- ——. _Summary Report Project Moby Dick: Covered
- Wagon Balloon Launcher Development and Test
- Results_, HDT-21, 1952. AD 001124
-
- ——. _Techniques Developed for Heavy Load
- Non-Extensible Balloon Flights_, Report No.
- HADC-TN-54-3, 1954. ADA 030902
-
- Greer, R.J., et al. _Development of a Balloon-Borne
- Manned Vehicle_, WADC TR-59-226, 1959. AD 227244
-
- Hertzberg, H.T.E. _The Anthropology of
- Anthropomorphic Dummies_,
- AMRL TR-69-61, 1969. AD 706411
-
- Hess, Joseph. _Determination of Parachute Descent
- Times and Impact Locations for High Altitude
- Balloon Payloads_, AFCRL 63-885, 1963. AD 421021
-
- Holloman Air Development Center, Weekly Test
- Status Reports, Project MX-1450B/7218
- (HIGH DIVE), June 1954 to January 1956. ADA 323823
-
- Madson, Raymond A., 1st Lt. _High Altitude Balloon
- Dummy Drops, II. The Stabilized Dummy
- Drops_, WADC TR 57-477 (II), 1961. AD 270880
-
- ——. _High Altitude Balloon Dummy Drops,
- Part I. The Unstabilized Dummy Drops_,
- WADC TR 57-477, 1957. AD 130965
-
- Mazza, Vincent and Wheeler, R.V. _High Altitude
- Bailouts_, MCREXD-695-66M, 1950. ADA 323449
-
- Nolan, George F. _Balloon Ascent Trajectory
- Dispersion Over the United States at 60,000
- and 100,000 ft_, AFCRL-66-98, 1966. AD 631502
-
- Redmond, Kent C. _Integration of the Holloman-White
- Sands Ranges, 1947–1952_, 1957. ADA 323574
-
- Ruffner, Kevin C. (ed). _Corona: America’s First
- Satellite Program_, 1995. PB 95928007
-
- Simons, David G., Lt. Col., (MC) _Stratosphere
- Balloon Techniques for Exposing Living
- Specimens to Primary Cosmic Ray Particles_,
- MDC TR 54-16, 1954. AD 075812
-
- ——. MAN HIGH II, MDC TR 59-28, 1959. ADA 230805
-
- Stapp, John P., Maj., (MC) _Human Tolerance to Linear
- Deceleration, Part I. Preliminary Survey of
- the Aft Facing Seated Position_, Air Force
- Technical Report 5915, 1949. PB 100871[*]
-
- ——. _Part II. The Aft Facing Position and the
- Development of a Crash Harness_, Air Force
- Technical Report 5915, 1951. PB 106572[*]
-
- [*] Available from:
- Library of Congress
- Photoduplicating Service
- Washington, D.C. 20540
- (202) 707-5640
-
-
-
-
- Index
-
-
- A
-
- accelerometers, 21, 30
-
- Aero Medical Laboratory, USAF 20–21, 23, 32, 104–105, 107, 117, 121
-
- Aeromedical Field Laboratory, USAF 32
-
- AFM-143-1, _Mortuary Affairs_, 99
-
- agents, federal, 50
-
- agents, government, 78
-
- Air Force, 1–3, 5, 8–10, 13, 21, 26, 28, 31, 35, 37–38, 41–42, 44,
- 46, 48, 51–53, 55, 57, 61–62, 68, 75–76, 79, 86, 89–91, 95–101,
- 103, 105, 109, 111–113, 116–117, 121, 123, 125.
- _See also_ U.S. Air Force
-
- Air Force Letter 35-3, 86
-
- Air Force, Secretary of the 1–2, 13
-
- Air Materiel Command (AMC), 19–20
-
- air samples, 42
-
- aircraft
- A-26, 112
- B-25, 96
- B-26, 112
- B-29, 93–94
- B-47, 93–94
- B-52, 115
- C-131, 105, 120
- C-47, 30, 64, 93–94
- F-4, 112, 121
- F-51, 96
- KB-29, 93–94
- KC-97, 3, 93–97
- KC-135, 93–94
- L-20, 30, 64, 124
- T-33, 93–94
- X-15, 32
-
- airman, 76, 86
-
- Alamogordo Army Airfield, N.M., 37
-
- Alamogordo, N.M., 32
-
- Alaska, 47
-
- Alderson Research Laboratories, Inc., 21, 34, 59–61
-
- alien(s), 1–3, 5, 11–12, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 28–29, 33, 36–39, 46–47,
- 55, 61, 75, 78, 96, 109, 113, 118, 123, 125
-
- ambulance, 76–78, 99, 105, 109, 113–116
-
- Anderson, Gerald, 14, 60–61, 67.
- _See also_ interview in Appendix C
-
- Antarctica, 47
-
- APO (Air Post Office), 82
-
- APOLLO, 32, 59
-
- Arizona, 47
-
- Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), 99
-
- arms, 62, 97
-
- Army Air Forces, 1, 13, 76, 81, 90, 96, 113.
- _See also_ U.S. Army Air Forces
-
- Army Nurse Corps (ANC), 81
-
- Artesia, N.M., 67
-
- Ashland, Wisc., 105
-
- Atlantic Ocean, 112
-
- autopsies, preliminary, 77, 91, 98
-
- autopsy, alien, 1
-
- autopsy protocol, 96–97, 99
-
- autopsy; ies; ied, 1, 12, 77–78, 94–95, 97, 99
-
- _Aztec_ (N.M.) _Independent Review_, 84
-
- Aztec, N.M., 83–85
-
-
- B
-
- Ball, Guy, 19
-
- Ballard Funeral Home, 76, 97
-
- ballast, 57
-
- Balloon Branch, 30, 37, 43–51, 57–58, 61, 65, 102–103, 105–107, 110,
- 113–115, 124
-
- balloon control package, 57, 64
-
- balloon controllers, 47, 57
-
- balloon drops, 28
-
- balloon failure, 58
-
- balloon, high altitude, 3, 9, 15, 17, 19, 23, 25, 28, 32, 36–38, 43,
- 45–49, 52–53, 55, 57–58, 61, 64, 66–67, 91, 96, 100–104, 109, 117, 125, 157
-
- balloon, polyethylene, 40–42, 58, 66, 106–107, 114–115
-
- balloon, tethered, 45–46
-
- balloon train, 5–6, 11–13
-
- balloon, “Vee”, 47
-
- balloon, weather, 5, 40
-
- balsa wood, 6
-
- bandages, 62, 64
-
- Barnett, Grady L. “Barney”, 58, 67
-
- base histories, 94
-
- Baylor University, 31
-
- Bean, Alan, 120
-
- _Behind the Flying Saucers_, 84
-
- Berliner, Don 8, 60
-
- Biodynamics of Space Flight, 102.
- _See_ MAN HIGH
-
- “black sergeant”, 86
-
- Blankenship, Robert, 49
-
- Blauw, Alfred S., M.D., 99
-
- blimp, 60–61, 64, 67
-
- body bags, 35–36, 91, 96
-
- Bravest Man, The. _See_ Stapp, John P., Col. (MC), USAF (Ret)
-
- Britain, 41
-
- Brooke General Hospital, Ft. Sam Houston, Tex., 83
-
- Buck Rogers, 111
-
- Bush, George H. W., President, 32
-
-
- C
-
- Cahn, J. P., 85
-
- Cambridge, England, 83
-
- camera(s), 30–31
-
- canoe, 76, 78, 91, 113, 115
-
- cargo trailer, 1½-ton, 65
-
- Carlsbad, N.M., 67
-
- Carswell AFB, Tex., 81
-
- caskets, 35, 76
-
- Chavez, Dennis, Sen. (N.M.), 87
-
- Cheney Award, 31–32
-
- _Close Encounters of the Third Kind_, 118
-
- Clouthier, Charles E., 83.
- _See also_ Signed sworn statement in Appendix B
-
- cold soaking, 64
-
- _Collier’s_, 26–27
-
- Coltman, Charles A., Jr., Col. (MC), USAF (Ret). _See_ Signed sworn
- statement in Appendix B
-
- commissary, 95, 98
-
- community relations, 58
-
- con-men, 85
-
- _Contributions of Balloon Operations to Research and Development at
- the Air Force Missile Development Center, Holloman AFB, N.Mex., 1947–1958_, 41
-
- cooperating witnesses, 6
-
- CORONA, 43
-
- cosmic ray particles, 42
-
- cover-up, 8–9, 26, 83, 110, 123, 125
-
- _Crash at Corona_, 8
-
-
- D
-
- debris, 1, 6, 57
-
- debris field, 11–12
-
- Dennis, W. Glenn, 75–78, 81–86, 88–90, 96–97, 99, 110, 114, 197
-
- Denver, Colo., 44
-
- Department of Defense, 46
-
- DISCOVERER XI, 43
-
- DISCOVERER XII, 43
-
- DISCOVERER XIII, 43–44
-
- dispensary, 114–116
-
- doctor(s), 76–78, 91, 96, 98–99, 110
-
- dog food, 77
-
- doll(s), 16, 61
-
- dolls, plastic, 14, 60–61
-
- “Dr. Gee”, 85
-
- drones, remotely-piloted, 15
-
- drug smuggling, 50
-
- drug store supervisor, 97
-
- dummies, anthropomorphic, 3, 9, 14, 16–17, 19–21, 23–26, 28, 32,
- 34–36, 38–39, 41, 47, 55–62, 64–65, 67–68, 91, 101, 103, 109, 112,
- 123, 156
-
- dummies, crash test, 17
-
- dummies, parachute drop, 19–20
-
- dummy drop, 23, 28, 35, 57, 157
-
- “Dummy Joe”, 19
-
-
- E
-
- ear, 61
-
- Earth, 5, 41, 44, 46, 102
-
- Edwards AFB, Calif., 21, 31
-
- Eisenhower, Dwight D., President, 112
-
- ejection, 32
-
- ejection seat, 20, 21
-
- El Centro, Calif., 120
-
- El Paso, Texas, 106
-
- Elder Statesman of Aviation, 112
-
- England, 82
-
- entry vehicles, atmospheric, 42
-
- escape pods, 78, 113
-
- EXCELSIOR, 23, 25–26, 32, 38, 55–56, 59, 67–68, 101–105, 107,
- 109–110, 112, 124
-
- Executive Order 11652, 1
-
- eyes, 77
-
-
- F
-
- Fanton, Eileen M., 1st Lt., USAF, 82–83, 91
-
- Farmington Drug, 83
-
- Farmington, N.M., 78, 83–84, 90
-
- Ferrell, Lee F., Col., USAF, 87, 91, 98
-
- finger(s), 15, 33, 55, 59–61, 97
-
- flight surgeon, 31, 107, 116
-
- flightsuit, 28–29, 63
-
- flying disc, 5–6, 78.
- _See also_ flying saucer
-
- flying saucer, 1–3, 5, 29, 36–37, 41, 44, 47, 56, 58–59, 64, 67, 78,
- 85, 96, 123, 125
-
- flying saucer wave [of 1947], 5
-
- Foster Ranch, 11
-
- Four Corners [region], 83
-
- Franklin, Ky., 96
-
- Frederick, S.D., 102
-
- Friedman, Stanton T., 8, 60, 76
-
- Ft. George Wright, Wash., 88
-
- Ft. Worth AAF, Tex., 81
-
- Fulgham, Dan D., Col., USAF (Ret), 106–107, 116, 121.
- _See also_ Signed sworn statement in Appendix B
-
- Fund for UFO Research, The, 58, 60, 186, 213, 215
-
- funeral home, 77, 95, 97.
- _See also_ Ballard Funeral Home
-
-
- G
-
- GALILEO, 44
-
- gamma rays, 46
-
- GAO, 1.
- _See also_ General Accounting Office
-
- gauges, strain, 21
-
- GEMINI, 32
-
- General Accounting Office (GAO), 1, 125
-
- _General Philosophy and Techniques of Balloon Control_, 48
-
- generator, MB-19, 65
-
- Gila Mountains, 124
-
- Gildenberg, Bernard D. “Duke”, 8–9, 48, 102.
- _See also_ Signed sworn statement in Appendix B
-
- glass, broken, 76, 114
-
- Goddard, Joyce, Capt., USAF, 88–89
-
- Gordon Bennett Gas Balloon Championship, 112
-
- gowns, surgical, 99
-
- gurneys, hospital, 35
-
- gyros, rate, 21
-
-
- H
-
- hands, 15, 33, 59–60, 97
-
- Harmon Trophy, 112
-
- Hawaii, 43
-
- head(s), 15, 59, 61, 77, 97, 100, 107, 118–120
-
- helicopter, 107, 110, 116–117
-
- helmet, 107
-
- helmets, pith, 60, 63
-
- hematoma, 119
-
- Hepburn, Audrey, 82
-
- hieroglyphics, 113–114
-
- Higgins, J.J., 19
-
- HIGH DIVE, 23, 26, 29–30, 34, 38, 55–56, 59, 63, 67–68, 103
-
- high-speed track, 17, 21, 38
-
- hoax, 96, 123
-
- Hodiak, John, 38
-
- Holloman AFB, N.M., 8–10, 16–17, 26–27, 30–32, 35, 37–38, 41, 43–44,
- 46–47, 49, 52–53, 59, 63–65, 102–103, 105–107, 111, 113–114, 118–120, 124
-
- Hollywood, 38
-
- horseback, 30
-
- human remains pouches, 96.
- _See also_ body bags
-
- Hynek, J. Allan, 117–118
-
-
- I
-
- identification specialist, 95, 98–99
-
- instrumentation kit, 30
-
- insulation bags, 35–36
-
- intimidation, 61
-
- irregular [research] methods, 8
-
-
- J
-
- Jagger, Dean, 38–39
-
- jeep, 15, 56, 65
-
- Johns Hopkins University, The, 53
-
- Jorgeson, Ole, A2C, USAF, 107, 113–114.
- _See also_ Signed sworn statement in Appendix B
-
- Jornada Test Range, 67
-
- Jupiter, 44
-
-
- K
-
- Kaufman, William C., Capt., USAF, 105–107, 116, 119.
- _See also_ statement in Appendix B
-
- Kelso, Wash., 96
-
- Kentucky Air National Guard, 96
-
- Kittinger, Joseph W., Jr., Capt., USAF, 25–26, 48, 101–107, 109–112,
- 117–120, 124.
- _See also_ Signed sworn statement in Appendix B
-
- Knight, Alice, 15, 58, 67, 213.
- _See also_ interview in Appendix C
-
- Korea, 88, 121
-
- Kovatch-Scott, Ethel, Col., USAF (Ret), 89
-
-
- L
-
- Las Vegas AFB, Nev., 111
-
- legal claims, 58
-
- _Life_ magazine, 26–27
-
- lights, strobe, 41
-
- “little men”, 84–85
-
- livestock, 58
-
- London, England, 41, 78, 82
-
- _Long, Lonely Leap, The_, 26, 110
-
- Lordsburg, N.M., 104
-
- Lovell, Jim, 120
-
- Luftwaffe, 20
-
- Lutz, Roland H. “Hap”, SSgt., USAF, 117.
- _See also_ Signed sworn statement in Appendix B
-
-
- M
-
- M-342 5-ton wrecker, 29, 58.
- _See also_ wrecker
-
- M-35 2½-ton cargo truck, 30, 58.
- _See also_ six by six
-
- M-37 ¾-ton utility truck, 30, 58, 65, 113.
- _See also_ weapons carrier
-
- M-43 ¾-ton ambulance, 65, 113.
- _See also_ ambulance
-
- _MAD_ [magazine], 26
-
- Madison, Guy, 38–39
-
- Madson, Raymond A., 1st Lt., USAF, 29–30, 63.
- _See also_ Signed sworn statement in Appendix B
-
- Maltais, Vern, 15, 58–59, 67, 214.
- _See also_ interview in Appendix C
-
- MAN HIGH, 26, 32, 48, 101–104, 110–112
-
- MAN IN SPACE SOONEST (MISS), 103
-
- Marcel, Jesse, Maj., USAF, 6
-
- Mars, 44
-
- Martin Marietta Corporation, 44
-
- masks, surgical, 99
-
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 103
-
- McClure, Clifton. 1st Lt., USAF, 102, 104
-
- McCook Field, Ohio, 19
-
- MERCURY, 32, 103–104
-
- “MERCURY Seven”, 32
-
- meteorological data, 42
-
- Mexico, 96
-
- MiG-21, 112
-
- Military Police, 76
-
- Milner, Martin, 38
-
- Minnesota, University of, 31
-
- missile, ballistic, 5
-
- missile, intercontinental ballistic (ICBM), Atlas F, 17
-
- missiles, 5, 13, 16
-
- missing nurse, 78, 81–83, 87–90, 96–98, 121.
- _See also_ Fanton, Eileen M., 1st Lt., USAF
-
- Mitchell, Cameron, 39
-
- ML-307B/AP. _See_ radar targets
-
- MOGUL, 1–2, 5–6, 9, 11–13, 40, 42, 78
-
- monkeys, 16
-
- Moon, 44
-
- Moore, Charles B., 8–9, 40
-
- morgue, 97
-
- morning reports, 81, 88, 89
-
- mortician, 76, 98–99
-
- mortuary, 76
-
- MPs, 77, 116.
- _See also_ Military Police
-
- Muroc AAF, Calif., 21, 31.
- _See also_ Edwards AFB, Calif.
-
- museum, 3, 75
-
- mystery witness, 75
-
-
- N
-
- NASA, 37, 41, 44–46, 59, 103, 111, 120
-
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 19
-
- National Aeronautics Association, 112
-
- National Archives and Record Administration, 81
-
- National Aviation Hall of Fame, 32
-
- _National Geographic_, 26
-
- National Medal of Technology, 32
-
- National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), 81
-
- NATO, 111
-
- NCO [Non-Commissioned Officer], 86
-
- Nenninger, Richard L., Maj., USAF, 124
-
- New Brighton, Minn., 102
-
- New Mexico, 1, 3, 5, 9, 11, 14–15, 17, 19, 23, 30, 34, 36–37, 41–42,
- 46–48, 55, 58, 60, 64, 67, 84, 91, 95, 109
-
- New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 9
-
- New York, N.Y., 21, 82
-
- New York University, 9, 40
-
- newspaper accounts, 41, 94
-
- newspaper announcements, 8
-
- newspapers, 31
-
- Newton, Silas M., 85
-
- Nixon, Richard M., President, 1
-
- nondisclosure agreements, 13
-
- Nordstrom, Frank B., Capt. (MC), USAF, 83, 89.
- _See also_ Signed sworn statement in Appendix B
-
- nosecone, 43
-
- nuclear accidents, 13
-
- nuclear weapon, 5
-
-
- O
-
- oscillograph, 30
-
- odor, 77, 91, 95–97
-
- officers’ club, 77.
- _See also_ Roswell AAF Officers’ Club
-
- oil field worker, 97.
- _See also_ Dennis, W. Glenn
-
- _Omni_ magazine, 83
-
- _On the Threshold of Space_, 26, 38–39, 63
-
- Orlando, Fla., 112
-
- “Oscar Eightball”, 21
-
-
- P
-
- Panama, 47
-
- paper, 5, 8
-
- paper, aluminized, 6
-
- parachute, 19, 23, 25–26, 28, 31, 49, 57, 62, 64, 103, 124
-
- pathologist, 95, 98–99
-
- pay load, 17, 40–44, 46–48, 53, 57, 61, 64, 66–67, 91
-
- Pease AFB, N.H., 115
-
- pediatrician, 76, 78, 81, 83–84, 86, 89–91, 99, 121
-
- pharmacist, 83
-
- phone directories, 97
-
- PIONEER, 44
-
- police, 49
-
- polyethylene, 40.
- _See also_ balloon, polyethylene
-
- polygraph examination, 60
-
- _Popular Mechanics Magazine_, 26–27
-
- POW, 112.
- _See also_ Prisoner of War
-
- _Pre-Astronauts, The_, 110
-
- predatory animals, 97
-
- preparation room, 97
-
- Prisoner of War, 110
-
- Project 119L, 42
-
- Project BLUEBOOK, 117
-
- Project GEMINI, 120
-
- Project MERCURY, 111
-
- Project MOGUL. See MOGUL
-
- property damage, 58, 66
-
-
- R
-
- radar, 6, 41
-
- radar guided missiles, 42
-
- radar targets, 6
-
- radio stations, 31
-
- Ragsdale, James, 14, 56, 67, 214.
- _See also_ interview in Appendix C
-
- ramp, 114, 120
-
- rancher, 5, 37
-
- Ray, Hilary, 120
-
- _Recollections of Roswell, Part II_, 58, 60, 186, 213, 215
-
- reconnaissance, photographic, 42
-
- redheaded captain, 60, 77, 91, 100, 109–110, 117
-
- redheaded colonel, 77, 87, 91, 96, 98
-
- redheaded officer, 77–78, 86
-
- remote control, 56–57
-
- research methodology, 11
-
- reward, 66
-
- rocket sled, 32, 39
-
- Rosie O’Grady’s Flying Circus, 112
-
- Roswell AAF, 6, 12, 15, 37, 45, 75–78, 81–83, 88–91, 116, 121, 197
-
- Roswell AAF hospital, 12–13, 75–78, 81–83, 86–90, 97, 109
-
- Roswell AAF Officers’ Club, 81, 87
-
- Roswell Army Air Field, 3, 5, 12–13, 45, 68.
- _See also_ Roswell AAF
-
- _Roswell Daily Record_, 8
-
- Roswell Incident, 1, 3, 5–6, 9, 11–12, 16–17, 21, 37–38, 42, 44–45,
- 60, 75, 78, 84–85, 88, 90, 116, 118, 121, 125
-
- Roswell Industrial Air Center, 37, 44
-
- Roswell, N.M., 1, 3, 5–6, 8–13, 15, 23, 30, 33–34, 36–37, 44, 47, 49,
- 51, 56, 58, 61, 65, 67–68, 76, 78, 83, 95, 97–102, 106, 109, 113,
- 187, 215
-
- _Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert_, 2
-
- rubber, 5, 8
-
- Ruidoso, N.M., 124
-
-
- S
-
- SAC. _See_ Strategic Air Command
-
- Sacramento Mountains, 106, 124
-
- safety belts, 19, 32
-
- San Agustin Mountains, 67
-
- San Agustin Pass, 67
-
- San Agustin Peak, 67
-
- San Agustin Plains, 11–12, 58, 67, 109
-
- _San Francisco Chronicle_, 85
-
- satellite, 41–44
-
- saucer, 30.
- _See also_ flying saucer
-
- Schiff, Steven, Rep. (N.M.), 1
-
- Schmitt, Donald, 56, 214
-
- Schock, Grover, Capt., USAF, 105
-
- Schwaderer, George, 98
-
- Schwartz, Eugene M., 1st Lt., USAF, 29
-
- scientists, civilian contract, 13
-
- Scully, Frank, 84–85
-
- Selff, Naomi Maria, 81, 88, 90
-
- sensors, 1
-
- sensors, acoustical, 5
-
- sheriff, 5, 49–50
-
- Sierra Engineering Company, 21, 60
-
- Sierra Madre, Calif., 21
-
- “Sierra Sam”, 21, 29
-
- _Sightings_, 96
-
- Silver City, N.M., 50
-
- Simons, David G., Lt. Col. (MC), USAF (Ret), 26, 48, 101–102, 104
-
- six-by-six, 15, 30, 55–56, 58, 65.
- _See also_ M-35 2½ ton cargo truck
-
- Slattery, Lucille C., Capt., USAF, 88–89
-
- Smithsonian Institution, 103
-
- Society of Automotive Engineers, 32
-
- _Socorro_ (N.M.) _Defensor Chieftain_, 6, 9
-
- Socorro, N.M., 8
-
- Sonic Wind Nᵒ 1, 31
-
- Southeast Asia, 110, 112
-
- Soviet, 5
-
- Soviet Union, 43
-
- space, 42–44, 46, 102–104, 121
-
- Space and Missile Command, Test and Evaluation Unit, 46
-
- space probe, 37, 42, 44
- GALILEO, 44
- PIONEER, 44
- SURVEYOR, 44
- VIKING, 37, 44
- VOYAGER-MARS, 45
-
- spacecraft, 44, 47
-
- spaceship, 6, 12, 38, 46, 67
-
- SPUTNIK I, 43
-
- St. Catherine’s Academy, Springfield, Ky., 82
-
- St. Mary Elizabeth’s Hospital, Louisville, Ky., 82
-
- Stack, Robert, 38
-
- Stafford, Ariz., 124
-
- Stapp Car Crash Conferences, 32
-
- Stapp, John P., Col. (MC), USAF (Ret), 20–21, 31–32, 38–39, 104–105,
- 107, 109, 111–112, 117, 120
-
- star witness, 75
-
- STARGAZER, 49, 101–105, 109–110, 112, 117–118
-
- statement, signed sworn, 56, 84
-
- sticks, 5, 8
-
- Strategic Air Command (SAC), 94, 115–116
-
- stretcher, military, 35
-
- sunglasses, 96
-
- SURVEYOR, 44
-
- symbols, 76
-
-
- T
-
- tanker, 95
-
- tape, 5, 8, 62
-
- tape, red [duct-type], 29, 62
-
- targets, missile, 42
-
- Ted Smith Company, 20–21
-
- Texas, University of, 31
-
- Texas, West, 47
-
- threats, 61
-
- _Time_, 26–27, 32
-
- tinfoil, 5, 8
-
- transducers, 21
-
- transducers, pressure, 30
-
- transmitters, radio, 41
-
- transponders, 41
-
- truck, pickup, 56, 58
-
- _True_ magazine, 84–85
-
- Tularosa Valley [N.M.], 23
-
- Twentieth Century Fox, 26, 38
-
-
- U
-
- U.S. Air Force, 1, 3, 14, 17, 19, 23, 37, 41, 43, 45–49, 55, 64, 67,
- 76, 82, 85–86, 90, 102–105, 111, 123, 125
-
- U.S. Army, 53, 86, 112
-
- U.S. Army Air Forces, 1, 5, 8–9, 12, 20, 31, 40, 75–76, 86, 120, 123
-
- U.S. Army Special Forces, 112
-
- U.S. Government, 1, 14, 42, 67
-
- U.S. Government Printing Office, 2
-
- U.S. Navy, 43, 103–104
-
- U.S. Navy Aerospace Recovery Facility, 120
-
- Ubon Air Base, Thailand, 121
-
- Udorn Air Base, Thailand, 112
-
- UFO, 2, 5, 9, 12, 37, 41, 44, 47–48, 58–59, 96, 117–118
- _UFO Crash at Roswell, The Truth About the_, 46–47
- UFO enthusiasts, 60
- UFO Museum and Research Center, The International, 3, 75
- UFO organizations, 60
- UFO proponents, 123
- UFO researchers, 81
- UFO theorists, 10, 47–48, 60, 67, 75, 78, 82–83, 85, 96, 113–116,
- 120, 123
-
- unidentified flying object, 41
-
- Units
- 1st Air Commando Wing, 111
- 6th Bombardment Wing, 94, 115–116
- 47th Air Division, 115
- 427th Army Air Forces Base Unit, 81
- Squadron “M”, 81
- 509th Aerial Refueling Squadron, 94
- 509th Bombardment Wing, 94, 115–116
- 555th Tactical Fighter Squadron (“Triple Nickel”), 112, 121
- 579th Strategic Missile Squadron, 17
- 4036th USAF hospital, 95
- 7510th USAF Hospital, 82
-
- unrecorded interviews, 8
-
- _Unsolved Mysteries_, 38, 60
-
- Upper Darby, Pa., 20
-
- USS Haiti Victory, 43
-
-
- V
-
- Vandenberg AFB, Calif., 43
-
- _Variety_, 84
-
- Venus, 44
-
- Vietnam, Hanoi, 112
-
- Vietnam, North, 112
-
- Vietnam, Republic of, 111, 121
-
- Vietnamese, North, 110
-
- VIKING, 37, 45
-
- “Vince and Larry”, 19
-
- VOYAGER-MARS, 44
-
-
- W
-
- Walker AFB, N.M., 15, 17, 45, 83, 86–89, 91, 93–95, 97–102, 107,
- 109–110, 113–117, 120–121
-
- Walker, Chalma, 89
-
- Walt Disney World, 112
-
- Walter, John. SSgt., USAF, 98
-
- Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 99
-
- Wasem, Martha, 89
-
- Washington, D.C., 99
-
- weapons carrier, 15, 30, 55–56, 58, 65, 113–114.
- _See also_ M-37 ¾-ton utility truck
-
- weather equipment, 5
-
- Whenry, Jack, 1st Lt., USAF, 98
-
- White House, The, 32
-
- White Sands Missile Range, N.M., 16, 42–43, 45, 67.
- _See also_ White Sands Proving Ground, N.M.
-
- White Sands National Monument, N.M., 29
-
- White Sands Proving Ground, N.M., 23, 25, 42, 106, 124
-
- White, William C., 103–104
-
- Wickenburg, Ariz., 50
-
- Williams, Carol, 89
-
- Wilson, Capt., 77–78, 87, 89
-
- Wilson, Idabelle M., Maj., USAF (Ret), 90
-
- Wilson, “Slatts”, 77–78, 87–91
-
- Wimpole Park, Cambridge, England, 83
-
- Winzen, Otto C., 101, 105
-
- Winzen Research International, 102
-
- World War I, 19
-
- World War II, 19–20
-
- wreckage, 76–77, 91, 99, 109, 113–114
-
- wreckage, bluish-purplish, 76, 78, 91, 113, 115
-
- wrecker, 15, 29–30, 55–56, 58, 65.
- _See also_ M-342 5-ton wrecker
-
- Wright Field, Ohio, 19, 21, 77
-
- Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 12, 77–78, 91, 95, 98, 100, 104–105, 107,
- 117, 119–120
-
-
-Transcriber’s Notes:
-
- - Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_).
- - Text enclosed by equals is in bold font (=bold=).
- - Blank pages have been removed.
- - Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected.
- - There are two types of footnotes: numbered footnotes are listed
- in the “Notes” sections, and starred footnotes appear immediately
- following the paragraph they refer to.
- - Text transcribed from images or documents has been left as is.
-
-
-
-
-
-End of Project Gutenberg's The Roswell Report: Case Closed, by James McAndrew
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE ROSWELL REPORT: CASE CLOSED ***
-
-***** This file should be named 63659-0.txt or 63659-0.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/6/3/6/5/63659/
-
-Produced by Tim Lindell, Robert Tonsing and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
-specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
-eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
-for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
-performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
-away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
-not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
-trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country outside the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
- are located before using this ebook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
-Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
-mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
-volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
-locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
-Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
-date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
-official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
-
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-