summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/63231-h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 18:07:33 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 18:07:33 -0700
commitf4c505eb9eacaa4674d9f54dbd02b1a1ac6ac940 (patch)
tree95a80a19b862c90aed07024d688bcee3e444438c /old/63231-h
initial commit of ebook 63231HEADmain
Diffstat (limited to 'old/63231-h')
-rw-r--r--old/63231-h/63231-h.htm1765
1 files changed, 1765 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/63231-h/63231-h.htm b/old/63231-h/63231-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..277654c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/63231-h/63231-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,1765 @@
+<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN' 'http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd'>
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<meta name="generator" content="Docutils 0.16: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/" />
+<style type="text/css">
+/*
+Project Gutenberg common docutils stylesheet.
+
+This stylesheet contains styles common to HTML and EPUB. Put styles
+that are specific to HTML and EPUB into their relative stylesheets.
+
+:Author: Marcello Perathoner (webmaster@gutenberg.org)
+:Copyright: This stylesheet has been placed in the public domain.
+
+This stylesheet is based on:
+
+ :Author: David Goodger (goodger@python.org)
+ :Copyright: This stylesheet has been placed in the public domain.
+
+ Default cascading style sheet for the HTML output of Docutils.
+
+*/
+
+/* ADE 1.7.2 chokes on !important and throws all css out. */
+
+/* FONTS */
+
+.italics { font-style: italic }
+.no-italics { font-style: normal }
+
+.bold { font-weight: bold }
+.no-bold { font-weight: normal }
+
+.small-caps { } /* Epub needs italics */
+.gesperrt { } /* Epub needs italics */
+.antiqua { font-style: italic } /* what else can we do ? */
+.monospaced { font-family: monospace }
+
+.smaller { font-size: smaller }
+.larger { font-size: larger }
+
+.xx-small { font-size: xx-small }
+.x-small { font-size: x-small }
+.small { font-size: small }
+.medium { font-size: medium }
+.large { font-size: large }
+.x-large { font-size: x-large }
+.xx-large { font-size: xx-large }
+
+.text-transform-uppercase { text-transform: uppercase }
+.text-transform-lowercase { text-transform: lowercase }
+.text-transform-none { text-transform: none }
+
+.red { color: red }
+.green { color: green }
+.blue { color: blue }
+.yellow { color: yellow }
+.white { color: white }
+.gray { color: gray }
+.black { color: black }
+
+/* ALIGN */
+
+.left { text-align: left }
+.justify { text-align: justify }
+.center { text-align: center; text-indent: 0 }
+.centerleft { text-align: center; text-indent: 0 }
+.right { text-align: right; text-indent: 0 }
+
+/* LINE HEIGHT */
+
+body { line-height: 1.5 }
+p { margin: 0;
+ text-indent: 2em }
+
+/* PAGINATION */
+
+.title, .subtitle { page-break-after: avoid }
+
+.container, .title, .subtitle, #pg-header
+ { page-break-inside: avoid }
+
+/* SECTIONS */
+
+body { text-align: justify }
+
+p.pfirst, p.noindent {
+ text-indent: 0
+}
+
+.boxed { border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em }
+.topic, .note { margin: 5% 0; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em }
+div.section { clear: both }
+
+div.line-block { margin: 1.5em 0 } /* same leading as p */
+div.line-block.inner { margin: 0 0 0 10% }
+div.line { margin-left: 20%; text-indent: -20%; }
+.line-block.noindent div.line { margin-left: 0; text-indent: 0; }
+
+hr.docutils { margin: 1.5em 40%; border: none; border-bottom: 1px solid black; }
+div.transition { margin: 1.5em 0 }
+
+.vfill, .vspace { border: 0px solid white }
+
+.title { margin: 1.5em 0 }
+.title.with-subtitle { margin-bottom: 0 }
+.subtitle { margin: 1.5em 0 }
+
+/* header font style */
+/* http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-fonts/#propdef-font-size */
+
+h1.title { font-size: 200%; } /* for book title only */
+h2.title, p.subtitle.level-1 { font-size: 150%; margin-top: 4.5em; margin-bottom: 2em }
+h3.title, p.subtitle.level-2 { font-size: 120%; margin-top: 2.25em; margin-bottom: 1.25em }
+h4.title, p.subtitle.level-3 { font-size: 100%; margin-top: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em; font-weight: bold; }
+h5.title, p.subtitle.level-4 { font-size: 89%; margin-top: 1.87em; margin-bottom: 1.69em; font-style: italic; }
+h6.title, p.subtitle.level-5 { font-size: 60%; margin-top: 3.5em; margin-bottom: 2.5em }
+
+/* title page */
+
+h1.title, p.subtitle.level-1,
+h2.title, p.subtitle.level-2 { text-align: center }
+
+#pg-header,
+h1.document-title { margin: 10% 0 5% 0 }
+p.document-subtitle { margin: 0 0 5% 0 }
+
+/* PG header and footer */
+#pg-machine-header { }
+#pg-produced-by { }
+
+li.toc-entry { list-style-type: none }
+ul.open li, ol.open li { margin-bottom: 1.5em }
+
+.attribution { margin-top: 1.5em }
+
+.example-rendered {
+ margin: 1em 5%; border: 1px dotted red; padding: 1em; background-color: #ffd }
+.literal-block.example-source {
+ margin: 1em 5%; border: 1px dotted blue; padding: 1em; background-color: #eef }
+
+/* DROPCAPS */
+
+/* BLOCKQUOTES */
+
+blockquote { margin: 1.5em 10% }
+
+blockquote.epigraph { }
+
+blockquote.highlights { }
+
+div.local-contents { margin: 1.5em 10% }
+
+div.abstract { margin: 3em 10% }
+div.image { margin: 1.5em 0 }
+div.caption { margin: 1.5em 0 }
+div.legend { margin: 1.5em 0 }
+
+.hidden { display: none }
+
+.invisible { visibility: hidden; color: white } /* white: mozilla print bug */
+
+a.toc-backref {
+ text-decoration: none ;
+ color: black }
+
+dl.docutils dd {
+ margin-bottom: 0.5em }
+
+div.figure { margin-top: 3em; margin-bottom: 3em }
+
+img { max-width: 100% }
+
+div.footer, div.header {
+ clear: both;
+ font-size: smaller }
+
+div.sidebar {
+ margin: 0 0 0.5em 1em ;
+ border: medium outset ;
+ padding: 1em ;
+ background-color: #ffffee ;
+ width: 40% ;
+ float: right ;
+ clear: right }
+
+div.sidebar p.rubric {
+ font-family: sans-serif ;
+ font-size: medium }
+
+ol.simple, ul.simple { margin: 1.5em 0 }
+
+ol.toc-list, ul.toc-list { padding-left: 0 }
+ol ol.toc-list, ul ul.toc-list { padding-left: 5% }
+
+ol.arabic {
+ list-style: decimal }
+
+ol.loweralpha {
+ list-style: lower-alpha }
+
+ol.upperalpha {
+ list-style: upper-alpha }
+
+ol.lowerroman {
+ list-style: lower-roman }
+
+ol.upperroman {
+ list-style: upper-roman }
+
+p.credits {
+ font-style: italic ;
+ font-size: smaller }
+
+p.label {
+ white-space: nowrap }
+
+p.rubric {
+ font-weight: bold ;
+ font-size: larger ;
+ color: maroon ;
+ text-align: center }
+
+p.sidebar-title {
+ font-family: sans-serif ;
+ font-weight: bold ;
+ font-size: larger }
+
+p.sidebar-subtitle {
+ font-family: sans-serif ;
+ font-weight: bold }
+
+p.topic-title, p.admonition-title {
+ font-weight: bold }
+
+pre.address {
+ margin-bottom: 0 ;
+ margin-top: 0 ;
+ font: inherit }
+
+.literal-block, .doctest-block {
+ margin-left: 2em ;
+ margin-right: 2em; }
+
+span.classifier {
+ font-family: sans-serif ;
+ font-style: oblique }
+
+span.classifier-delimiter {
+ font-family: sans-serif ;
+ font-weight: bold }
+
+span.interpreted {
+ font-family: sans-serif }
+
+span.option {
+ white-space: nowrap }
+
+span.pre {
+ white-space: pre }
+
+span.problematic {
+ color: red }
+
+span.section-subtitle {
+ /* font-size relative to parent (h1..h6 element) */
+ font-size: 100% }
+
+table { margin-top: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em; border-spacing: 0 }
+table.align-left, table.align-right { margin-top: 0 }
+
+table.table { border-collapse: collapse; }
+
+table.table.hrules-table thead { border: 1px solid black; border-width: 2px 0 0 }
+table.table.hrules-table tbody { border: 1px solid black; border-width: 2px 0 }
+table.table.hrules-rows tr { border: 1px solid black; border-width: 0 0 1px }
+table.table.hrules-rows tr.last { border-width: 0 }
+table.table.hrules-rows td,
+table.table.hrules-rows th { padding: 1ex 1em; vertical-align: middle }
+
+table.table tr { border-width: 0 }
+table.table td,
+table.table th { padding: 0.5ex 1em }
+table.table tr.first td { padding-top: 1ex }
+table.table tr.last td { padding-bottom: 1ex }
+table.table tr.first th { padding-top: 1ex }
+table.table tr.last th { padding-bottom: 1ex }
+
+
+table.citation {
+ border-left: solid 1px gray;
+ margin-left: 1px }
+
+table.docinfo {
+ margin: 3em 4em }
+
+table.docutils { }
+
+div.footnote-group { margin: 1em 0 }
+table.footnote td.label { width: 2em; text-align: right; padding-left: 0 }
+
+table.docutils td, table.docutils th,
+table.docinfo td, table.docinfo th {
+ padding: 0 0.5em;
+ vertical-align: top }
+
+table.docutils th.field-name, table.docinfo th.docinfo-name {
+ font-weight: bold ;
+ text-align: left ;
+ white-space: nowrap ;
+ padding-left: 0 }
+
+/* used to remove borders from tables and images */
+.borderless, table.borderless td, table.borderless th {
+ border: 0 }
+
+table.borderless td, table.borderless th {
+ /* Override padding for "table.docutils td" with "!important".
+ The right padding separates the table cells. */
+ padding: 0 0.5em 0 0 } /* FIXME: was !important */
+
+h1 tt.docutils, h2 tt.docutils, h3 tt.docutils,
+h4 tt.docutils, h5 tt.docutils, h6 tt.docutils {
+ font-size: 100% }
+
+ul.auto-toc {
+ list-style-type: none }
+</style>
+<style type="text/css">
+/*
+Project Gutenberg HTML docutils stylesheet.
+
+This stylesheet contains styles specific to HTML.
+*/
+
+/* FONTS */
+
+/* em { font-style: normal }
+strong { font-weight: normal } */
+
+.small-caps { font-variant: small-caps }
+.gesperrt { letter-spacing: 0.1em }
+
+/* ALIGN */
+
+.align-left { clear: left;
+ float: left;
+ margin-right: 1em }
+
+.align-right { clear: right;
+ float: right;
+ margin-left: 1em }
+
+.align-center { margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto }
+
+div.shrinkwrap { display: table; }
+
+/* SECTIONS */
+
+body { margin: 5% 10% 5% 10% }
+
+/* compact list items containing just one p */
+li p.pfirst { margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0 }
+
+.first { margin-top: 0 !important;
+ text-indent: 0 !important }
+.last { margin-bottom: 0 !important }
+
+span.dropcap { float: left; margin: 0 0.1em 0 0; line-height: 1 }
+img.dropcap { float: left; margin: 0 0.5em 0 0; max-width: 25% }
+span.dropspan { font-variant: small-caps }
+
+.no-page-break { page-break-before: avoid !important }
+
+/* PAGINATION */
+
+.pageno { position: absolute; right: 95%; font: medium sans-serif; text-indent: 0 }
+.pageno:after { color: gray; content: '[' attr(title) ']' }
+.lineno { position: absolute; left: 95%; font: medium sans-serif; text-indent: 0 }
+.lineno:after { color: gray; content: '[' attr(title) ']' }
+.toc-pageref { float: right }
+
+@media screen {
+ .coverpage, .frontispiece, .titlepage, .verso, .dedication, .plainpage
+ { margin: 10% 0; }
+
+ div.clearpage, div.cleardoublepage
+ { margin: 10% 0; border: none; border-top: 1px solid gray; }
+
+ .vfill { margin: 5% 10% }
+}
+
+@media print {
+ div.clearpage { page-break-before: always; padding-top: 10% }
+ div.cleardoublepage { page-break-before: right; padding-top: 10% }
+
+ .vfill { margin-top: 20% }
+ h2.title { margin-top: 20% }
+}
+
+/* DIV */
+pre { font-family: monospace; font-size: 0.9em; white-space: pre-wrap }
+</style>
+<title>cii.rst</title>
+<meta name="PG.Title" content="Castes In India" />
+<meta name="PG.Id" content="63231" />
+<meta name="PG.Released" content="2020-09-18" />
+<meta name="PG.Rights" content="Public Domain" />
+<meta name="PG.Producer" content="Joseph Koshy" />
+<meta name="PG.Credits" content="Transcribed from The Indian Antiquary, Vol. 46, pp. 81–95." />
+<meta name="DC.Title" content="Castes In India" />
+<meta name="DC.Creator" content="Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar" />
+<meta name="DC.Language" content="en" />
+<meta name="DC.Created" content="1917" />
+
+<link rel="schema.DCTERMS" href="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" />
+<link rel="schema.MARCREL" href="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/" />
+<meta name="DCTERMS.title" content="Castes in India" />
+<meta name="DCTERMS.source" content="file:///htdocs/ebookmaker/cache/20200918105821/cii.rst" />
+<meta name="DCTERMS.language" content="en" scheme="DCTERMS.RFC4646" />
+<meta name="DCTERMS.modified" content="2020-09-18T17:58:25.061708+00:00" scheme="DCTERMS.W3CDTF" />
+<meta name="DCTERMS.publisher" content="Project Gutenberg" />
+<meta name="DCTERMS.rights" content="Public Domain in the USA." />
+<link rel="DCTERMS.isFormatOf" href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/63231" />
+<meta name="DCTERMS.creator" content="Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar" />
+<meta name="DCTERMS.creator" content="Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar" />
+<meta name="DCTERMS.created" content="2020-09-18" scheme="DCTERMS.W3CDTF" />
+<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
+<meta name="generator" content="Ebookmaker 0.9.7 by Project Gutenberg" />
+</head>
+<body>
+<div class="document">
+
+
+<!-- this is the default PG-RST stylesheet -->
+<!-- figure and image styles for non-image formats -->
+<!-- default transition -->
+<!-- default attribution -->
+<!-- -*- encoding: utf-8 -*- -->
+<!-- -*- encoding: utf-8 -*- -->
+<div class="docutils container language-en pgheader" id="pg-header" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<p class="noindent pfirst"><span>This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
+and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
+restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
+under the terms of the </span><a class="reference internal" href="#project-gutenberg-license">Project Gutenberg License</a><span> included with
+this ebook or online at </span><a class="reference external" href="https://www.gutenberg.org/license">https://www.gutenberg.org/license</a><span>. If you
+are not located in the United States, you'll have to check the laws
+of the country where you are located before using this ebook.</span></p>
+<p class="noindent pnext"></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 2em">
+</div>
+<div class="docutils container" id="pg-machine-header">
+<p class="noindent pfirst"><span>Title: Castes In India
+<br />
+<br />Author: Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar
+<br />
+<br />Release Date: September 18, 2020 [EBook #63231]
+<br />
+<br />Language: English
+<br />
+<br />Character set encoding: UTF-8</span></p>
+</div>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 2em">
+</div>
+<p class="noindent pfirst" id="pg-start-line"><span>*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK </span><span>CASTES IN INDIA</span><span> ***</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 4em">
+</div>
+<p class="noindent pfirst" id="pg-produced-by"><span>Produced by Joseph Koshy.</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<p class="noindent pfirst"><span>Transcribed from The Indian Antiquary, Vol. 46, pp. 81–95.</span></p>
+</div>
+<div class="clearpage">
+</div>
+<div class="docutils container">
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="small">THE</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="xx-large">INDIAN ANTIQUARY</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="large">A JOURNAL OF ORIENTAL RESEARCH</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="small">IN</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<div class="line-block outermost">
+<div class="center line"><span class="medium">ARCHÆOLOGY, EPIGRAPHY, ETHNOLOGY, GEOGRAPHY, HISTORY, FOLKLORE, LANGUAGES,</span></div>
+<div class="center line"><span class="medium">LITERATURE, NUMISMATICS, PHILOSOPHY, RELIGION, </span><em class="italics medium">&amp;c</em><span class="medium">., </span><em class="italics medium">&amp;c</em><span class="medium">.</span></div>
+</div>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 2em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="small">EDITED BY</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="medium">SIR RICHARD CARNAC TEMPLE, BART, C.B., C.I.E., F.S.A.</span></p>
+<div class="line-block outermost">
+<div class="center line"><span class="small">HON. FELLOW, TRIN. HALL, CAMBRIDGE,</span></div>
+<div class="center line"><span class="small">FORMERLY LIEUT.-COLONEL, INDIAN ARMY.</span></div>
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="small">AND</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="medium small-caps">Prof. DEVADATTA RAMKRISHNA BHANDARKAR, M.A.</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 2em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span>⸻</span></p>
+<p class="center pnext"><span>VOL. XLVI.—1917.</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 3em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="bold medium">BOMBAY:</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="small small-caps">Printed and Published at the BRITISH INDIA PRESS, Mazgaon, Bombay.</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="medium">LONDON:</span></p>
+<div class="line-block outermost">
+<div class="center line"><span class="medium">BERNARD QUARITCH LIMITED, 11 GRAFTON STREET,</span></div>
+<div class="center line"><span class="medium">NEW BOND STREET, W.</span></div>
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="medium">[</span><em class="italics medium">All Rights Reserved</em><span class="medium">.]</span></p>
+</div>
+<div class="clearpage">
+</div>
+<p class="pfirst"><span>[pg 81]</span></p>
+<div class="level-2 section" id="castes-in-india">
+<h2 class="level-2 pfirst section-title title"><span>CASTES IN INDIA.</span></h2>
+<p class="center pfirst"><strong class="bold">Their mechanism, genesis and development.</strong><a class="footnote-reference" href="#id2" id="id1"><sup>1</sup></a></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<p class="center pfirst"><span class="small">BY BHIMRAO R. AMBEDKAR, M. A.</span></p>
+<div class="vspace" style="height: 1em">
+</div>
+<p class="pfirst"><span>Many of us, I dare say, have witnessed local, national, or
+international expositions of material objects that make up the sum
+total of human civilization. But few can entertain the idea of there
+being such a thing as an exposition of human institutions. Exhibition
+of human institutions is a strange idea; some might call it the
+wildest of ideas. But as students of Ethnology I hope you will not be
+hard on this innovation, for it is not so, and to you at least it
+should not be strange.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>You all have visited, I believe, some historic place like the ruins of
+Pompeii, and listened with curiosity to the history of the remains as
+it flowed from the glib tongue of the guide. In my opinion a student
+of Ethnology, in one sense at least, is much like the guide. Like his
+prototype, he holds up (perhaps with more seriousness and desire of
+self instruction) the social institutions to view, with all the
+objectiveness humanly possible, and inquires into their origin and
+function.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Most of our fellow students in this Seminar, which concerns itself
+with Primitive </span><em class="italics">versus</em><span> Modern Society, have ably acquitted themselves
+along these lines by giving lucid expositions of the various
+institutions, modern or primitive, in which they are interested. It
+is my turn now, this evening, to entertain you, as best I can, with a
+paper on “Castes in India: their mechanism, genesis and development.”</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>I need hardly remind you of the complexity of the subject I intend to
+handle. Subtler minds and abler pens than mine have been brought to
+the task of unravelling the mysteries of Caste; but unfortunately it
+still remains in the domain of the “unexplained,” not to say of the
+“un-understood.” I am quite alive to the complex intricacies of a
+hoary institution like Caste, but I am not so pessimistic as to
+relegate it to the region of the unknowable, for I believe it can be
+known. The caste problem is a vast one, both theoretically and
+practically. Practically, it is an institution that portends
+tremendous consequences. It is a local problem, but one capable of
+much wider mischief, for “as long as caste in India does exist, Hindus
+will hardly intermarry or have any social intercourse with outsiders;
+and if Hindus migrate to other regions on earth, Indian caste would
+become a world problem.”</span><a class="footnote-reference" href="#id4" id="id3"><sup>2</sup></a><span> Theoretically, it has defied a great
+many scholars who have taken upon themselves, as a labour of love, to
+dig into its origin. Such being the case, I cannot treat the problem
+in its entirety. Time, space and acumen, I am afraid, would all fail
+me, if I attempted to do otherwise than limit myself to a phase of it,
+namely, the genesis, mechanism and spread of the caste system. I will
+strictly observe this rule, and will dwell on extraneous matters only
+when it is necessary to clarify or support a point in my thesis.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>To proceed with the subject. According to well-known ethnologists,
+the population of India is a mixture of Aryans, Dravidians, Mongolians
+and Scythians. All these stocks of people came into India from
+various directions and with various cultures, centuries ago, when they
+were in a tribal state. They all in turn elbowed their entry into the
+country by fighting with their predecessors, and after a stomachful of
+it settled down as peaceful neighbours. Through constant contact and
+mutual intercourse they evolved a common [pg 82] culture that
+superseded their distinctive cultures. It may be granted that there
+has not been a thorough amalgamation of the various stocks that make
+up the peoples of India, and to a traveller from within the boundaries
+of India the East presents a marked contrast in physique and even in
+colour to the West, as does the South to the North. But amalgamation
+can never be the sole criterion of homogeneity as predicated of any
+people. Ethnically all peoples are heterogeneous. It is the unity of
+culture that is the basis of homogeneity. Taking this for granted, I
+venture to say that there is no country that can rival the Indian
+Peninsula with respect to the unity of its culture. It has not only a
+geographic unity, but it has over and above all a deeper and a much
+more fundamental unity—the indubitable cultural unity that covers the
+land from end to end. But it is because of this homogeneity that
+Caste becomes a problem so difficult to be explained. If the Hindu
+Society were a mere federation of mutually exclusive units, the matter
+would be simple enough. But Caste is a parcelling of an already
+homogeneous unit, and the explanation of the genesis of Caste is the
+explanation of this process of parcelling.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Before launching into our field of enquiry, it is better to advise
+ourselves regarding the nature of a caste. I will therefore draw upon
+a few of the best students of caste for their definitions of it.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>(1) M. Senart, a French authority, defines a caste as “a close
+corporation, in theory at any rate rigorously hereditary: equipped
+with a certain traditional and independent organisation, including a
+chief and a council, meeting on occasion in assemblies of more or less
+plenary authority and joining together at certain festivals: bound
+together by common occupations, which relate more particularly to
+marriage and to food and to questions of ceremonial pollution, and
+ruling its members by the exercise of jurisdiction, the extent of
+which varies, but which succeeds in making the authority of the
+community more felt by the sanction of certain penalties and, above
+all, by final irrevocable exclusion from the group.”</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>(2) Mr. Nesfield defines a caste as “a class of the community which
+disowns any connection with any other class and can neither intermarry
+nor eat nor drink with any but persons of their own community.”</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>(3) According to Sir H. Risley, “a caste may be defined as a
+collection of families or groups of families bearing a common name
+which usually denotes or is associated, with specific occupation,
+claiming common descent from a mythical ancestor, human or divine,
+professing to follow the same professional callings and are regarded
+by those who are competent to give an opinion as forming a single
+homogeneous community.”</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>(4) Dr. Ketkar defines caste as “a social group having two
+characteristics: (1) membership is confined to those who are born of
+members and includes all persons so born; (2) the members are
+forbidden by an inexorable social law to marry outside the group.”</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>To review these definitions is of great importance for our purpose.
+It will be noticed that taken individually the definitions of three of
+the writers include too much or too little: none is complete or
+correct by itself and all have missed the central point in the
+mechanism of the Caste system. Their mistake lies in trying to define
+caste as an isolated unit by itself, and not as a group within, and
+with definite relations to, the system of caste as a whole. Yet
+collectively all of them are complementary to one another, each one
+emphasising what has been obscured in the other. By way of criticism,
+therefore, I will take only those points common to all Castes in each
+of the above definitions which are regarded as peculiarities of Caste
+and evaluate them as such.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>[pg 83] To start with M. Senart, He draws attention to the “idea of
+pollution” as a characteristic of Caste. With regard to this point it
+may be safely said that it is by no means a peculiarity of Caste as
+such. It usually originates in priestly ceremonialism and is a
+particular case of the general belief in purity. Consequently its
+necessary connection with Caste may be completely denied without
+damaging the working of Caste. The “idea of pollution” has been
+attached to the institution of Caste, only because the Caste that
+enjoys the highest rank is the priestly Caste: while we know that
+priest and purity are old associates. We may therefore conclude that
+the “idea of pollution” is a characteristic of Caste only in so far as
+Caste has a religious flavour. Mr. Nesfield in his way dwells on the
+absence of messing with those outside the Caste as one of its
+characteristics. In spite of the newness of the point we must say
+that Mr. Nesfield has mistaken the effect for the cause. Caste, being
+a self-enclosed unit, naturally limits social intercourse, including
+messing etc., to members within it. Consequently this absence of
+messing with outsiders is not due to positive prohibition, but is a
+natural result of Caste, </span><em class="italics">i.e.</em><span>, exclusiveness. No doubt this absence
+of messing, originally due to exclusiveness, acquired the prohibitory
+character of a religious injunction, but it may be regarded as a later
+growth. Sir H. Risley, makes no new point deserving of special
+attention.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>We now pass on to the definition of Dr. Ketkar, who has done much for
+the elucidation of the subject. Not only is he a native, but he has
+also brought a critical acumen and an open mind to bear on his study
+of Caste. His definition merits consideration, for he has defined
+Caste in its relation to a system of Castes, and has concentrated his
+attention only on those characteristics which are absolutely necessary
+for the existence of a Caste within a system, rightly excluding all
+others as being secondary or derivative in character. With respect to
+his definition it must, however, be said that in it there is a slight
+confusion of thought, lucid and clear as otherwise it is. He speaks
+of </span><strong class="bold">Prohibition of Intermarriage</strong><span> and </span><strong class="bold">Membership by Autogeny</strong><span> as
+the two characteristics of Caste. I submit that these are but two
+aspects of one and the same thing, and not two different things as
+Dr. Ketkar supposes them to be. If you prohibit inter-marriage the
+result is that you limit, membership to those born within the group.
+Thus the two are the obverse and the reverse sides of the same medal.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>This critical evaluation of the various characteristics of Caste
+leaves no doubt that prohibition, or rather the absence of
+intermarriage—endogamy, to be concise—is the only one that can be
+called the essence of Caste when rightly understood. But some may
+deny this on abstract anthropological grounds, for there exist
+endogamous groups without giving rise to the problem of Caste. In a
+general way this may be true, as endogamous societies, culturally
+different, making their abode in localities more or less removed, and
+having little to do with each other, are a physical reality. The
+negroes and the whites and the various tribal groups that go by the
+name of American Indians in the United States may be cited as more or
+less appropriate illustrations in support of this view. But we must
+not confuse matters, for in India the situation is different. As
+pointed out before, the peoples of India form a homogeneous whole.
+The various races of India occupying definite territories have more or
+less fused into one another and do possess a cultural unity, which is
+the only criterion of a homogeneous population. Given this
+homogeneity as a basis, Caste becomes a problem altogether new in
+character and wholly absent in the situation constituted by the mere
+propinquity of endogamous social or tribal [pg 84] groups. Caste in
+India means an artificial chopping off of the population into fixed
+and definite units, each one prevented from fusing into another
+through the custom of endogamy. Thus the conclusion is inevitable
+that </span><strong class="bold">endogamy is the only characteristic that is peculiar to
+Caste</strong><span>, and if we succeed in showing how endogamy is maintained, we
+shall practically have proved the genesis and also the mechanism of
+Caste.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>It may not be quite easy for you to anticipate why I regard endogamy
+as a key to the mystery of the Caste system. Not to strain your
+imagination too much, I will proceed to give you my reasons for it.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>It may not also be out of place to emphasize at this moment that no
+civilized society of to-day presents more survivals of primitive times
+than does the Indian society. Its religion is essentially primitive
+and its tribal code, in spite of the advance of time and civilization,
+operates in all its pristine vigour even to-day. One of these
+primitive survivals, to which I wish particularly to draw your
+attention, is the </span><strong class="bold">custom of exogamy</strong><span>. The prevalence of exogamy in
+the primitive world is a fact too well known to need any explanation.
+With the growth of history, however, exogamy has lost its efficacy
+and, excepting the nearest blood-kins, there is usually no social bar
+restricting the field of marriage. But regarding the peoples of India
+the law of exogamy is a positive injunction even to-day. Indian
+society still savours of the clan system, even though there are no
+clans: and this can be easily seen from the law of matrimony which
+centres round the principle of exogamy, for it is not that </span><em class="italics">sapindas</em><span>
+(blood-kins) cannot marry, but a marriage even between </span><em class="italics">sagotras</em><span> (of
+the same class) is regarded as a sacrilege.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Nothing is therefore more important for you to remember than the fact
+that endogamy is foreign to the people of India. The various </span><em class="italics">gotras</em><span>
+of India are and have been exogamous: so are the other groups with
+totemic organization. It is no exaggeration to say that with the
+people of India exogamy is a creed and none dare infringe it, so much
+so that, in spite of the endogamy of the Castes within them, exogamy
+is strictly observed and that there are more rigorous penalties for
+violating exogamy than there are for violating endogamy. You will,
+therefore, readily see that with exogamy as the rule there could be no
+Castes, for exogamy means fusion. But we </span><em class="italics">have</em><span> Castes; consequently
+in the final analysis creation of Castes, so far as India is
+concerned, means the superposition of endogamy on exogamy. However,
+in an originally exogamous population an easy working out of endogamy
+(which is equivalent to the creation of Caste) is a grave problem, and
+it is in the consideration of the means utilized for the preservation
+of endogamy against exogamy that we may hope to find the solution of
+our problem.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Thus the </span><strong class="bold">superposition of endogamy on exogamy means the creation of
+Caste</strong><span>. But this is not an easy affair. Let us take an imaginary
+group that desires to make itself into a Caste and analyse what means
+it will have to adopt to make itself endogamous. If a group desires
+to make itself endogamous a formal injunction against intermarriage
+with outside groups will be of no avail, especially if prior to the
+introduction of endogamy, exogamy had been the rule in all matrimonial
+relations. Again, there is a tendency in all groups lying in close
+contact with one another to assimilate and amalgamate, and thus
+consolidate into a homogenous society. If this tendency is to be
+strongly counteracted in the interest of Caste formation, it is
+absolutely necessary to circumscribe a circle outside which people
+should not contract marriages.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Nevertheless, this encircling to prevent marriages from without
+creates problems from within which are not very easy of solution.
+Roughly speaking, in a normal group the [pg 85] two sexes are more or
+less evenly distributed, and generally speaking there is an equality
+between those of the same age. The equality is, however, never quite
+realized in actual societies. At the same time to the group that is
+desirous of making itself into a caste the maintenance of equality
+between the sexes becomes the ultimate goal, for without it endogamy
+can no longer subsist. In other words, if endogamy is to be preserved
+conjugal rights from within have to be provided for, otherwise members
+of the group will be driven out of the circle to take care of
+themselves in any way they can. But in order that the conjugal rights
+be provided for from within, it is absolutely necessary to maintain a
+numerical equality between the marriageable units of the two sexes
+within the group desirous of making itself into a Caste. It is only
+through the maintenance of such an equality that the necessary
+endogamy of the group can be kept intact, and a very large disparity
+is sure to break it.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">The problem of Caste, then, ultimately resolves itself into one of
+repairing the disparity between the marriageable units of the two
+sexes within it</strong><span>. Left to nature, the much needed parity between the
+units can be realized only when a couple dies simultaneously. But
+this is a rare contingency. The husband may die before the wife and
+create a </span><em class="italics">surplus woman</em><span>, who must be disposed of, else through
+intermarriage she will violate the endogamy of the group. In like
+manner the husband may survive his wife and be a </span><em class="italics">surplus man</em><span>, whom
+the group, while it may sympathise with him for the sad bereavement,
+has to dispose of, else he will marry outside the Caste and will break
+the endogamy. Thus both the </span><em class="italics">surplus man</em><span> and the </span><em class="italics">surplus woman</em><span>
+constitute a menace to the Caste if not taken care of, for not finding
+suitable partners inside their prescribed circle (and left to
+themselves they cannot find any, for if the matter be not regulated
+there can only be just enough pairs to go round) very likely they will
+transgress the boundary, marry outside and import offspring that is
+foreign to the Caste.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Let us see what our imaginary group is likely to do with this </span><em class="italics">surplus
+man</em><span> and </span><em class="italics">surplus woman</em><span>. We will first take up the case of the
+</span><em class="italics">surplus woman</em><span>. She can be disposed of in two different ways so as
+to preserve the endogamy of the Caste.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>First: burn her on the funeral pyre of her deceased husband and get
+rid of her. This, however, is rather an impracticable way of solving
+the problem of sex disparity. In some cases it may work, in others it
+may not. Consequently every </span><em class="italics">surplus woman</em><span> cannot thus be disposed
+of, because it is an easy solution but a hard realization. And so the
+</span><em class="italics">surplus woman</em><span> (= widow), if not disposed of, remains in the group:
+but in her very existence lies a double danger. She may marry outside
+the Caste and violate endogamy, or she may marry within the Caste and
+through competition encroach upon the chances of marriage that must be
+reserved for the potential brides in the Caste. She is therefore a
+menace in any case, and something must be done to her if she cannot be
+burned along with her deceased husband.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>The second remedy is to enforce widowhood on her for the rest of her
+life. So far as the objective results are concerned, burning is a
+better solution than enforcing widowhood. Burning the widow
+eliminates all the three evils that a </span><em class="italics">surplus woman</em><span> is fraught with.
+Being dead and gone she creates no problem of remarriage either inside
+or outside the Caste. But compulsory widowhood is superior to burning
+because it is more practicable. Besides being comparatively humane it
+also guards against the evils of remarriage as does burning: but it
+fails to guard the morals of the group. No doubt under compulsory
+widowhood the woman remains, and just because she is deprived of her
+natural right of being a legitimate wife in future, the incentive to
+immoral conduct is increased. But [pg 86] this is by no means an
+insuperable difficulty. She can be degraded to a condition in which
+she is no longer a source of allurement.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>The problem of </span><em class="italics">surplus man</em><span> (= widower) is much more important and
+much more difficult than that of the </span><em class="italics">surplus woman</em><span> in a group that
+desires to make itself into a Caste. From time immemorial man as
+compared with woman has had the upper hand. He is a dominant figure
+in every group and of the two sexes has greater prestige. With this
+traditional superiority of man over woman his wishes have always been
+consulted. Woman, on the other hand, has been an easy prey to all
+kinds of iniquitous injunctions, religious, social or economic. But
+man as a maker of injunctions is most often above them all. Such
+being the case, you cannot accord the same kind of treatment to a
+</span><em class="italics">surplus man</em><span> as you can to a </span><em class="italics">surplus woman</em><span> in a Caste.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>The project of burning him with his deceased wife is hazardous in two
+ways: first of all it cannot be done, simply because he is a man.
+Secondly, if done, a sturdy soul is lost to the Caste. There remain
+then only two solutions which can conveniently dispose of him. I say
+conveniently, because he is an asset to the group.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Important as he is to the group, endogamy is still more important, and
+the solution must assure both these ends. Under these circumstances
+he may be forced, or I should say induced, after the manner of the
+widow, to remain a widower for the rest of his life. This solution is
+not altogether difficult, for without any compulsion some are so
+disposed as to enjoy self-imposed celibacy, or even to take a further
+step of their own accord and renounce the world and its joys. But,
+given human nature as it is, this solution can hardly be expected to
+be realized. On the other hand, as is very likely to be the case, if
+the </span><em class="italics">surplus man</em><span> remains in the group as an active participator in
+group activities, he is a danger to the morals of the group. Looked
+at from a different point of view celibacy, though easy in cases where
+it succeeds, is not so advantageous even then to the material
+prospects of the Caste. If he observes genuine celibacy and renounces
+the world, he would not be a menace to the preservation of Caste
+endogamy or Caste morals as he undoubtedly would be if he remained a
+secular person. But as an ascetic celibate he is as good as burned,
+so far as the material well-being of his Caste is concerned. A Caste,
+in order that it may be large enough to afford a vigorous communal
+life, must be maintained at a certain numerical strength. But to hope
+for this and to proclaim celibacy is the same as trying to cure
+atrophy by bleeding.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Imposing celibacy on the </span><em class="italics">surplus man</em><span> in the group, therefore, fails
+both theoretically and practically. It is in the interest of the
+Caste to keep him as a </span><em class="italics">grahastha</em><span> (one who raises a family), to use a
+Sanskrit technical term. But the problem is to provide him with a
+wife from within the Caste. At the outset this is not possible, for
+the ruling ratio in a caste has to be one man to one woman and none
+can have two chances of marriage, for in a Caste thoroughly
+self-enclosed there are always just enough marriageable women to go
+round for the marriageable men. Under these circumstances the
+</span><em class="italics">surplus man</em><span> can be provided with a wife only by recruiting a bride
+from the ranks of those not yet marriageable in order to tie him down
+to the group. This is certainly the best of the possible solutions in
+the case of the </span><em class="italics">surplus man</em><span>. By this, he is kept within the Caste.
+By this means numerical depletion through constant outflow is guarded
+against, and by this endogamy and morals are preserved.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>It will now be seen that the four means by which numerical disparity
+between the two sexes is conveniently maintained are: (1) Burning the
+widow with her deceased [pg 87] husband; (2) Compulsory widowhood—a
+milder form of burning; (3) Imposing celibacy on the widower; (4)
+Wedding him to a girl not yet marriageable. Though, as I said above,
+burning the widow and imposing celibacy on the widower are of doubtful
+service to the group in its endeavour to preserve its endogamy, all of
+them operate as </span><em class="italics">means</em><span>. But means, as forces, when liberated or set
+in motion create an end. What then is the end that these means
+create? They create and perpetuate endogamy, while caste and
+endogamy, according to our analysis of the various definitions of
+caste, are one and the same thing. Thus the existence of these means
+is identical with caste and caste involves those means.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>This, in my opinion, is the general mechanism of a caste in a system
+of castes. Let us now turn from these high generalities to the castes
+in Hindu society and inquire into their mechanism. I need hardly
+promise that there are a great many pitfalls in the path of those who
+try to unfold the past, and caste in India to be sure is a very
+ancient institution. This is especially true where there exist no
+authentic or written records, or where the people, like the Hindus,
+are so constituted that to them writing history is a folly, for the
+world is an illusion. But institutions do live, though for a long
+time they may remain unrecorded and as often as not customs and morals
+are like fossils that tell their own history. If this is true, our
+task will be amply rewarded if we scrutinize the solution the Hindus
+arrived at to meet the problems of the </span><em class="italics">surplus man</em><span> and </span><em class="italics">surplus
+woman</em><span>.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Complex though it be in its general working the Hindu Society, even to
+a superficial observer, presents three singular uxorial customs,
+namely:—</span></p>
+<ol class="lowerroman simple">
+<li><p class="first pfirst"><em class="italics">Sati</em><span> or the burning of the widow on the funeral pyre of her
+deceased husband.</span></p>
+</li>
+<li><p class="first pfirst"><span>Enforced widowhood by which a widow is not allowed to remarry.</span></p>
+</li>
+<li><p class="first pfirst"><span>Girl marriage.</span></p>
+</li>
+</ol>
+<p class="pfirst"><span>In addition, one also notes a great hankering after </span><em class="italics">sannyasa</em><span>
+(renunciation) on the part of the widower, but this may in some cases
+be due purely to psychic disposition.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>So far as I know, no scientific explanation of the origin of these
+customs is forthcoming even to-day. We have plenty of philosophy to
+tell us why these customs were honoured, but nothing to tell us the
+causes of their origin and existence. </span><em class="italics">Sati</em><span> has been honoured
+(</span><em class="italics">Cf</em><span>. A. K. Coomaraswamy, </span><em class="italics">Sati: a Defence of the Eastern Woman</em><span> in
+the </span><em class="italics">British Sociological Review</em><span>, Vol. VI. 1913) because it is a
+“proof of the perfect unity of body and soul” between husband and wife
+and of “devotion beyond the grave;” because it embodied the ideal of
+wifehood, which is well expressed by Umâ when she said “Devotion to
+her Lord is woman's honour, it is her eternal heaven: and O
+Maheshvara,” she adds with a most touching human cry, “I desire not
+paradise itself if thou art not satisfied with me!” Why compulsory
+widowhood is honoured I know not, nor have I yet met with any one who
+sang in praise of it, though there are a great many who adhere to it.
+The eulogy in honour of girl marriage is reported by Dr. Ketkar to be
+as follows: “A really faithful man or woman ought not to feel
+affection for a woman or a man other than the one with whom he or she
+is united. Such purity is compulsory not only after marriage, but
+even before marriage, for that is the only correct ideal of chastity.
+No maiden could be considered pure if she feels love for a man other
+than the one to whom she might be married. As she does not know to
+whom she is going to be married, she must not feel affection for any
+man at all before marriage. If she does so, it is a sin. So it is
+better for a girl to know whom she has to love, before any sexual
+consciousness has been awakened in her.”</span><a class="footnote-reference" href="#id6" id="id5"><sup>3</sup></a><span> Hence girl marriage.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>This high-flown and ingenious sophistry indicates why these
+institutions were honoured, but does not tell us why they were
+practised. My own interpretation is that they were honoured because
+they were practised. Any one slightly acquainted with rise of
+individualism in the 18th century will appreciate my remark. At all
+times, it is the movement that is most important; and the philosophies
+grow around it long afterwards to justify it and give it a moral
+support. In like manner I urge that the very fact that these customs
+were so highly eulogized proves that they needed eulogy for their
+prevalence. Regarding the question as to why they arose, I submit
+that they were needed to create the structure of caste and the
+philosophies in honour of them were intended to popularize them, or to
+gild the pill, as we might say, for they must have been so abominable
+and shocking to the moral sense of the unsophisticated that they
+needed a great deal of sweetening. These customs are essentially of
+the nature of </span><em class="italics">means</em><span>, though they are represented as ideals. But
+this should not blind us from understanding the </span><em class="italics">results</em><span> that flow
+from them. One might safely say that idealization of means is
+necessary and in this particular case was perhaps motivated to endow
+them with greater efficacy. Calling a means an end does no harm,
+except that it disguises its real character; but it does not deprive
+it of its real nature, that of a means. You may pass a law that all
+cats are dogs, just as you can call a means an end. But you can no
+more change the nature of means thereby than you can turn cats into
+dogs; consequently I am justified in holding that, whether regarded as
+ends or as means, </span><em class="italics">Sati</em><span>, </span><em class="italics">enforced widowhood</em><span> and </span><em class="italics">girl marriage</em><span> are
+customs that were primarily intended to solve the problem of the
+</span><em class="italics">surplus man</em><span> and </span><em class="italics">surplus woman</em><span> in a caste and to maintain its
+endogamy. Strict endogamy could not be preserved without these
+customs, while caste without endogamy is a fake.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Having explained the mechanism of the creation and preservation of
+Caste in India, the further question as to its genesis naturally
+arises. The question of origin is always an annoying question and in
+the study of Caste it is sadly neglected: some have connived at it,
+while others have dodged it. Some are puzzled as to whether there
+could be such a thing as the origin of caste and suggest that “if we
+cannot control our fondness for the word ‘origin’, we should better
+use the plural form, </span><em class="italics">viz.</em><span>, ‘origins of caste’.” As for myself I do
+not feel puzzled by the Origin of Caste in India, for, as I have
+established before, endogamy is the only characteristic of Caste and
+when I say </span><strong class="bold">origin of caste</strong><span> I mean </span><strong class="bold">the origin of the mechanism
+for endogamy</strong><span>.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>The atomistic conception of individuals in a Society so greatly
+popularised—I was about to say vulgarized—in political orations is the
+greatest humbug. To say that individuals make up society is trivial;
+society is always composed of classes. It may be an exaggeration to
+assert the theory of class-conflict, but the existence of definite
+classes in a society is a fact. Their basis may differ. They may be
+economic or intellectual or social, but an individual in a society is
+always a member of a class. This is a universal fact and early Hindu
+society could not have been an exception to this rule, and, as a
+matter of fact, we know it was not. If we bear this generalization in
+mind, our study of the genesis of caste would be very much
+facilitated, for we have only to determine what was the class that
+first made itself into a caste, for class and caste, so to say, are
+next door neighbours, and it is only a span that separates the two.
+</span><strong class="bold">A caste is an enclosed class</strong><span>.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>The study of the origin of caste must furnish us with an answer to the
+question—what is the class that raised this “enclosure” around itself?
+The question [pg 89] may seem too inquisitorial, but it is pertinent,
+and an answer to this will serve us to elucidate the mystery of the
+growth and development of castes all over India. Unfortunately a
+direct answer to this question is not within my power. I can answer
+it only indirectly. I said just above that the customs in question
+were current in the Hindu society. To be true to facts it is
+necessary to qualify the statement, as it connotes universality of
+their prevalence. These customs in all their strictness are
+obtainable only in one caste, namely the Brahmans, who occupy the
+highest place in the social hierarchy of the Hindu society; and as
+their prevalence in Non-Brahman castes is derivative their observance
+is neither strict nor complete. This important fact can serve as a
+basis of an important observation. If the prevalence of these customs
+in the non-Brahman Castes is derivative, as can be shown very easily,
+then it needs no argument to prove what class is the father of the
+institution of caste. Why the Brahman class should have enclosed
+itself into a caste is a different question, which may be left as an
+employment for another occasion. But the strict observance of these
+customs and the social superiority arrogated by the priestly class in
+all ancient civilizations are sufficient to prove that they were the
+originators of this “unnatural institution” founded and maintained
+through these unnatural means.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>I now come to the third part of my paper regarding the question of the
+growth and spread of the caste system all over India. The question I
+have to answer is: How did the institution of caste spread among the
+rest of the non-Brahman population of the country? The question of
+the spread of the castes all over India has suffered a worse fate than
+the question of genesis. And the main cause, as it seems to me, is
+that the two questions of spread and of origin are not separated.
+This is because of the common belief among scholars that the caste
+system has either been imposed upon the docile population of India by
+a law-giver as a divine dispensation, or that it has grown according
+to some law of social growth peculiar to the Indian people.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>I first propose to handle the law-giver of India. Every country has
+its lawgiver, who arises as an incarnation (</span><em class="italics">avatar</em><span>) in times of
+emergency to set right a sinning humanity and give it the laws of
+justice and morality. Manu, the law-giver of India, if he did exist,
+was certainly an audacious person. If the story that he gave the law
+of caste be credited, then Manu must have been a dare-devil fellow and
+the humanity that accepted his dispensation must be a humanity quite
+different from the one we are acquainted with. It is unimaginable
+that the law of caste was </span><em class="italics">given</em><span>. It is hardly an exaggeration to
+say that Manu could not have outlived his law, for what is that class
+that can submit to be degraded to the status of brutes by the pen of a
+man, and suffer him to raise another class to the pinnacle? Unless he
+was a tyrant who held all the population in subjection it cannot be
+imagined that he could have been allowed to dispense his patronage in
+this grossly unjust manner, as may be easily seen by a mere glance at
+his “Institutes.” I may seem hard on Manu, but I am sure my force is
+not strong enough to kill his ghost. He lives, like a disembodied
+spirit and is appealed to, and I am afraid will yet live long. One
+thing I want to impress upon you is that Manu did not </span><em class="italics">give</em><span> the </span><em class="italics">law</em><span>
+of Caste and that he could not do so. Caste existed long before Manu.
+He was an upholder of it and therefore philosophised about it, but
+certainly he did not and could not ordain the present order of Hindu
+Society. His work ended with the codification of existing caste rules
+and the preaching of Caste </span><em class="italics">Dharma</em><span>. The spread and growth of the
+Caste system is too [pg 90] gigantic a task to be achieved by the
+power or cunning of an individual or of a class. Similar in argument
+is the theory that the Brahmans created the caste. After what I have
+said regarding Manu, I need hardly say anything more, except to point
+out that it is incorrect in thought and malicious in intent. The
+Brahmans may have been guilty of many things, and I dare say they are,
+but the imposing of the caste system on the non-Brahman population was
+beyond their mettle. They may have helped the process by their glib
+philosophy, but they certainly could not have pushed their scheme
+beyond their own confines. To fashion society after one's own
+pattern! How glorious! How hard! One can take pleasure and eulogize
+its furtherance, but cannot further it very far. The vehemence of my
+attack may seem to be unnecessary: but I can assure you that it is not
+uncalled for. There is a strong belief in the mind of orthodox Hindus
+that the Hindu Society was somehow moulded into the frame work of the
+Caste System, and that it is an organization consciously created by
+the </span><em class="italics">Shâstras</em><span>. Not only does this belief exist, but it is being
+justified on the ground that it cannot but be good, because it is
+ordained by the </span><em class="italics">Shâstras</em><span> and the </span><em class="italics">Shâstras</em><span> cannot be wrong. I have
+urged so much on the adverse side of this attitude, not because the
+religious sanctity is grounded on scientific basis, nor to help those
+reformers who are preaching against it. Preaching did not make the
+caste system, neither will it unmake it. My aim is to show the
+falsity of the attitude that has exalted religious sanction to the
+position of a scientific explanation.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Thus the great man theory does not help us very far in solving the
+spread of castes in India. Western scholars, probably not much given
+to hero-worship, have attempted other explanations. The nuclei, round
+which have “formed” the various castes in India, are, according to
+them:—(1) occupation; (2) survivals of tribal organizations, etc.; (3)
+the rise of new belief; (4) cross-breeding and (5) migration.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>The question may be asked whether these nuclei do not exist in other
+societies and whether they are peculiar to India. If they are not
+peculiar to India, but are common to the world, why is it that they
+did not “form” caste on other parts of this planet? Is it because
+those parts are holier than the land of the Vedas, or that the
+professors are mistaken? I am afraid that the latter is the truth.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Inspite of the high theoretic value claimed by the several authors for
+their respective theories, based on one or other of the above nuclei,
+one regrets to say that on close examination they are nothing more
+than filling illustrations—what Matthew Arnold means by “the grand
+name without the grand thing in it.” Such are the various theories of
+caste advanced by Sir Denzil Ibbetson, Mr. Nesfield, M. Senart and
+Sir H. Risley. To criticise them in a lump would be to say that they
+are a disguised form of the </span><em class="italics">Petitio Principii</em><span> of formal logic. To
+illustrate: Mr. Nesfield says that “function and function only … was the
+foundation upon which the whole system of castes in India was built
+up.” But he may rightly be reminded that he does not very much
+advance our thought by making the above statement, which practically
+amounts to saying that castes in India are functional or occupational,
+which is a very poor discovery! We have yet to know from Mr. Nesfield
+why is it that an occupational group turned into an occupational
+caste? I would very cheerfully have undertaken the task of dwelling on
+the [pg 91] theories of other ethnologists, had it not been for the
+fact that Mr. Nesfield's is a typical one.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Without stopping to criticize those theories that explain the caste
+system as a natural phenomenon occurring in obedience to the law of
+disintegration, as explained by Herbert Spencer in his formula
+of evolution, or as natural as “the structural differentiation within
+an organism”—to employ the phraseology of orthodox apologists—, or as
+an early attempt to test the laws of eugenics—as all belonging to the
+same class of fallacy which regards the caste system as inevitable, or
+as being consciously imposed in anticipation of these laws on a
+helpless and humble population, I will now lay before you my own view
+on the subject.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>We shall be well advised to recall at the outset that the Hindu
+society, in common with other societies, was composed of classes and
+the earliest known are the (1) Brahmans or the priestly class: (2) the
+Kshatriya, or the military class: (3) the Vaiśya, or the merchant
+class: and (4) the Sudra, or the artisan and menial class. Particular
+attention has to be paid to the fact that this was essentially a class
+system, in which individuals, when qualified, could change their
+class, and therefore classes did change their personnel. At some time
+in the history of the Hindus, the priestly class socially detached
+itself from the rest of the body of people and through a closed-door
+policy became a caste by itself. The other classes being subject to
+the law of social division of labour underwent differentiation, some
+into large, others into very minute groups. The Vaiśya and Sudra
+classes were the original inchoate plasm, which formed the sources of
+the numerous castes of to-day. As the military occupation does not
+very easily lend itself to very minute sub-division, the Kshatriya
+class could have differentiated into soldiers and administrators.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>This sub-division of a society is quite natural. But the unnatural
+thing about these sub-divisions is that they have lost the open door
+character of the class system and have become self-enclosed units
+called castes. The question is, were they compelled to close their
+doors and become endogamous, or did they close them of their own
+accord? I submit that there is a double line of answer: </span><strong class="bold">Some closed
+the door: others found it closed against them</strong><span>. The one is a
+psychological interpretation and the other is mechanistic, but they
+are complementary and both are necessary to explain the phenomena of
+caste formation in its entirety.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>I will first take up the psychological interpretation. The question
+we have to answer in this connection is: Why did these sub-divisions
+or classes, if you please, industrial, religious or otherwise, become
+self-enclosed or endogamous? My answer is because the Brahmans were
+so. Endogamy, or the closed-door system, was a fashion in the Hindu
+Society, and as it had originated from the Brahman caste it was
+whole-heartedly imitated by all the non-Brahman sub-divisions or
+classes, who, in their turn, became endogamous castes. It is “the
+infection of imitation” that caught all these sub-divisions on their
+onward march of differentiation and has turned them into castes. The
+propensity to imitate is a deep-seated one in the human mind and need
+not be deemed an inadequate explanation for the formation of the
+various castes in India. It is so deep-seated that Walter Bagehot
+argues that “we must not think of … imitation as voluntary, or even
+conscious. On the contrary it has its seat mainly in very obscure
+parts of the mind, whose notions, so far from being consciously
+produced, are hardly felt to exist; so far from being conceived
+beforehand, are not even felt at the time. The main seat of the
+imitative part of our nature is our belief, and the causes
+predisposing us to believe this or disinclining us to believe that are
+among the obscurest parts of our nature. But as to the imitative
+nature [pg 92] of credulity there can be no doubt.”</span><a class="footnote-reference" href="#id10" id="id7"><sup>4</sup></a><span> This
+propensity to imitate has been made the subject of a scientific study
+by Gabriel Tarde, who lays down three laws of imitation. One of his
+three laws is that imitation flows from the higher to the lower or, to
+quote his own words, “Given the opportunity, a nobility will always
+and everywhere imitate its leaders, its kings or sovereigns, and the
+people likewise, given the opportunity, its nobility.”</span><a class="footnote-reference" href="#id11" id="id8"><sup>5</sup></a><span> Another of
+Tarde's laws of imitation is: that the extent or intensity of
+imitation varies inversely in proportion to distance, or in his own
+words “the thing that is most imitated is the most superior one of
+those that are nearest. In fact, the influence of the model's example
+is efficacious inversely to its </span><em class="italics">distance</em><span> as well as directly to its
+superiority. Distance is understood here in its sociological meaning.
+However distant in space a stranger may be, he is close by, from this
+point of view, if we have numerous and daily relations with him and if
+we have every facility to satisfy our desire to imitate him. This law
+of the imitation of the nearest, of the least distant, explains the
+gradual and consecutive character of the spread of an example that has
+been set by the higher social ranks.”</span><a class="footnote-reference" href="#id12" id="id9"><sup>6</sup></a></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>In order to prove my thesis—which really needs no proof—that some
+castes were formed by imitation, the best way, it seems to me, is to
+find out whether or not the vital conditions for the formation of
+castes by imitation exist in the Hindu Society. The conditions for
+imitation, according to this standard authority are: (1) That the
+source of imitation must enjoy prestige in the group and (2) that
+there must be “numerous and daily relations” among members of a group.
+That these conditions were present in India there is little reason to
+doubt. The Brahman is a semi-god and very nearly a demi-god. He sets
+up a mode and moulds the rest. His prestige is unquestionable and is
+the fountain-head of bliss and good. Can such a being, idolised by
+Scriptures and venerated by the priest-ridden multitude, fail to
+project his personality on the suppliant humanity? Why, if the story
+be true, he is believed to be the very end of creation. Such a
+creature is worthy of more than mere imitation, but at least of
+imitation; and if he lives in an endogamous enclosure, should not the
+rest follow his example? Frail humanity! Be it embodied in a grave
+philosopher or a frivolous housemaid, it succumbs. It cannot be
+otherwise. Imitation is easy and invention is difficult.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Yet another way of demonstrating the play of imitation in the
+formation of castes is to understand the attitude of non-Brahman
+classes towards those customs which supported the structure of caste
+in its nascent days until, in the course of history, it became
+embedded in the Hindu mind and hangs there to this day without any
+support—for now it needs no prop but belief—like a weed on the surface
+of a pond. In a way, but only in a way, the status of a caste in the
+Hindu Society varies directly with the extent of the observance of the
+customs of </span><em class="italics">sati</em><span>, enforced widowhood, and girl marriage. But
+observance of these customs varies directly with the </span><em class="italics">distance</em><span> (I am
+using the word in the Tardian sense) that separates the caste. Those
+castes that are nearest to the Brahmans have imitated all the three
+customs and insist on the strict observance thereof. Those that are
+less near have imitated enforced widowhood and girl marriage; others,
+a little further off, have only girl marriage, and those furthest off
+have imitated only the belief in the caste principle. This imperfect
+imitation, I dare say, is due partly to what Tarde calls “distance”
+and partly to the barbarous character of these customs. This [pg 93]
+phenomenon is a complete illustration of Tarde's law and leaves no
+doubt that the whole process of caste-formation in India is a process
+of imitation of the higher by the lower. At this juncture I will turn
+back to support a former conclusion of mine, which might have appeared
+to you as too sudden or unsupported. I said that the Brahman class
+first raised the structure of caste by the help of those three customs
+in question. My reason for that conclusion was that their existence
+in other classes was derivative. After what I have said regarding the
+rôle of imitation in the spread of these customs among the non-Brahman
+castes, as means or as ideals, though the imitators have not been
+aware of it, they exist among them as derivatives; and, if they are
+derived, there must have been prevalent one original caste that was
+high enough to have served as a pattern for the rest. But in a
+theocratic society, who could be the pattern but the servant of God?</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>This completes the story of those that were weak enough to close their
+doors. Let us now see how others were closed in as a result of being
+closed out. This I call the mechanistic process of the formation of
+caste. It is mechanistic because it is inevitable. That this line of
+approach, as well as the psychological one, to the explanation of the
+subject has escaped my predecessors is entirely due to the fact that
+they have conceived Caste as a unit by itself and not as one within a
+System of Caste. The result of this oversight or lack of sight has
+been very detrimental to the proper understanding of the subject
+matter and therefore its correct explanation. I will proceed to offer
+my own explanation by making one remark which I will urge you to bear
+constantly in mind. It is this: that </span><strong class="bold">caste in the singular number
+is an unreality</strong><span>. </span><strong class="bold">Castes exist only in the plural number</strong><span>. There
+is no such thing as </span><em class="italics">a</em><span> caste: there are always castes. To illustrate
+my meaning: while making themselves into a caste, the Brahmans, by
+virtue of this, created a non-Brahman caste; or, to express it in my
+own way, while closing themselves in they closed others out. I will
+clear my point by taking another illustration. Take India as a whole
+with its various communities designated by the various creeds to which
+they owe allegiance, to wit, the Hindus, Muhammadans, Jews, Christians
+and Parsis. Now, barring the Hindus, the rest within themselves are
+non-caste communities. But with respect to each other they are
+castes. Again, if the first four enclose themselves, the Parsis are
+directly closed out, but are indirectly closed in. Symbolically, if
+group A. wants to be endogamous, group B. has to be so by sheer force
+of circumstances.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Now apply the same logic to the Hindu society and you have another
+explanation of the “fissiparous” character of caste, as a consequence
+of the virtue of self-duplication that is inherent in it. Any
+innovation that seriously antagonises the ethical, religious and
+social code of the Caste is not likely to be tolerated by the Caste,
+and the recalcitrant members of a Caste are in danger of being thrown
+out of the Caste, and left to their own fate without having the
+alternative of being admitted into or absorbed by other Castes. Caste
+rules are inexorable and they do not wait to make nice distinctions
+between kinds of offence. Innovation may be of any kind, but all
+kinds will suffer the same penalty. A novel way of thinking will
+create a new Caste for the old ones will not tolerate it. The noxious
+thinker respectfully called Guru (Prophet) suffers the same fate as
+the sinners in illegitimate love. The former creates a caste of the
+nature of a religious sect and the latter a type of mixed caste.
+Castes have no mercy for a sinner who has the courage to violate the
+code. The penalty is excommunication and the result is a new caste.
+It is not peculiar Hindu psychology that induces the excommunicated to
+form themselves into a caste: far from it. On the contrary, very
+often they have been quite [pg 94] willing to be humble members of
+some caste (higher by preference) if they could be admitted within its
+fold. But castes are enclosed units and it is their conspiracy with
+clear conscience that compels the excommunicated to make themselves
+into a caste. The logic of this obdurate circumstance is merciless,
+and it is in obedience to its force that some unfortunate groups find
+themselves enclosed, because others in enclosing, themselves have
+closed them out, with the result that new groups (formed on any basis
+obnoxious to the caste rules) by a mechanical law are constantly being
+converted into castes to a bewildering multiplicity. Thus is told the
+second tale in the process of Caste formation in India.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Now to summarise the main points of my thesis. In my opinion there
+have been several mistakes committed by the students of Caste, which
+have misled them in their investigations. European students of Caste
+have unduly emphasised the rôle of colour in the caste-system.
+Themselves impregnated by colour prejudices, they very readily
+imagined it to be the chief factor in the Caste problem. But nothing
+can be farther from the truth, and Dr. Ketkar is correct when he
+insists that “All the princes whether they belonged to the so-called
+Aryan race, or the so-called Dravidian race, were Aryas. Whether a
+tribe or a family was racially Aryan or Dravidian was a question which
+never troubled the people of India, until foreign scholars came in and
+began to draw the line. The colour of the skin had long ceased to be
+a matter of importance.”</span><a class="footnote-reference" href="#id14" id="id13"><sup>7</sup></a><span> Again, they have mistaken mere
+descriptions for explanation and fought over them as though they were
+theories of origin. There are occupational, religious, etc. castes,
+it is true, but it is by no means an explanation of the origin of
+Caste. We have yet to find out why occupational groups are castes;
+but this question has never even been raised. Lastly they have taken
+Caste very lightly as though a breath had made it. On the contrary,
+Caste, as I have explained it, is almost impossible to be sustained:
+for the difficulties that it involves are tremendous. It is true that
+Caste rests on belief, but before belief comes to be the foundation of
+an institution, the institution itself needs to be perpetuated and
+fortified. My study of the Caste problem involves four main
+points: (1) That in spite of the composite make-up of the Hindu
+population, there is a deep cultural unity. (2) That Caste is a
+parcelling into bits of a larger cultural unit. (3) That there was one
+Caste to start with. (4) That classes have become Castes through
+imitation and excommunication.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Peculiar interest attaches to the problem of Caste in India to-day, as
+persistent attempts are being made to do away with this unnatural
+institution. Such attempts at reform, however, have aroused a great
+deal of controversy regarding its origin, as to whether it is due to
+the conscious command of a Supreme Authority, or is an unconscious
+growth in the life of a human society under peculiar circumstances.
+Those who hold the latter view will, I hope, find some food for
+thought in the standpoint adopted in this paper. Apart from its
+practical importance the subject of Caste is an all absorbing problem
+and the interest aroused in me regarding its theoretic foundations has
+moved me to put before you some of the conclusions, which seem to me
+well founded, and the grounds upon which they may be supported. I am
+not, however, so presumptuous as to think them in any way final, or
+anything more than a contribution to a discussion of the subject. It
+seems to me that the car has been shunted on wrong lines, and the
+primary object of the paper is to indicate what I regard to be the
+right path of investigation, with a view to arrive at a serviceable
+truth. We must, however, guard against approaching the subject with a
+bias.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>[pg 95] Sentiment must be outlawed from the domain of science and
+things should be judged from an objective standpoint. For myself I
+shall find as much pleasure in a positive destruction of my own
+ideology, as in a rational disagreement on a topic, which,
+notwithstanding many learned disquisitions is likely to remain
+controversial for ever. To conclude, while I am ambitious to advance
+a Theory of Caste, if it can be shown to be untenable I shall be
+equally willing to give it up.</span></p>
+<div class="clearpage">
+</div>
+<div class="docutils container footnotes">
+<div class="footnote-group">
+<table class="docutils footnote" frame="void" id="id2" rules="none">
+<colgroup><col class="label" /><col /></colgroup>
+<tbody valign="top">
+<tr><td class="label"><a class="fn-backref" href="#id1">[<span class="smaller">1</span>]</a></td><td><p class="first last pfirst"><span class="smaller">A paper read before the Anthropology Seminar (9th May 1916) of
+Dr. A. A. Goldenweiser, Columbia University, New York.</span></p>
+</td></tr>
+</tbody>
+</table>
+<table class="docutils footnote" frame="void" id="id4" rules="none">
+<colgroup><col class="label" /><col /></colgroup>
+<tbody valign="top">
+<tr><td class="label"><a class="fn-backref" href="#id3">[<span class="smaller">2</span>]</a></td><td><p class="first last pfirst"><span class="smaller">Ketkar, </span><em class="italics smaller">Caste</em><span class="smaller">, p. 4.</span></p>
+</td></tr>
+</tbody>
+</table>
+<table class="docutils footnote" frame="void" id="id6" rules="none">
+<colgroup><col class="label" /><col /></colgroup>
+<tbody valign="top">
+<tr><td class="label"><a class="fn-backref" href="#id5">[<span class="smaller">3</span>]</a></td><td><p class="first last pfirst"><em class="italics smaller">History of Caste in India</em><span class="smaller">, 1909, pp. 32–33.</span></p>
+</td></tr>
+</tbody>
+</table>
+<table class="docutils footnote" frame="void" id="id10" rules="none">
+<colgroup><col class="label" /><col /></colgroup>
+<tbody valign="top">
+<tr><td class="label"><a class="fn-backref" href="#id7">[<span class="smaller">4</span>]</a></td><td><p class="first last pfirst"><em class="italics smaller">Physics and Politics</em><span class="smaller"> 1915, p. 60.</span></p>
+</td></tr>
+</tbody>
+</table>
+<table class="docutils footnote" frame="void" id="id11" rules="none">
+<colgroup><col class="label" /><col /></colgroup>
+<tbody valign="top">
+<tr><td class="label"><a class="fn-backref" href="#id8">[<span class="smaller">5</span>]</a></td><td><p class="first last pfirst"><em class="italics smaller">Laws of Imitation</em><span class="smaller">, Tr. by E. C. Parsons, 2nd ed. p. 217.</span></p>
+</td></tr>
+</tbody>
+</table>
+<table class="docutils footnote" frame="void" id="id12" rules="none">
+<colgroup><col class="label" /><col /></colgroup>
+<tbody valign="top">
+<tr><td class="label"><a class="fn-backref" href="#id9">[<span class="smaller">6</span>]</a></td><td><p class="first last pfirst"><em class="italics smaller">Ibid</em><span class="smaller">. p. 224.</span></p>
+</td></tr>
+</tbody>
+</table>
+<table class="docutils footnote" frame="void" id="id14" rules="none">
+<colgroup><col class="label" /><col /></colgroup>
+<tbody valign="top">
+<tr><td class="label"><a class="fn-backref" href="#id13">[<span class="smaller">7</span>]</a></td><td><p class="first last pfirst"><em class="italics smaller">History of Caste</em><span class="smaller"> p. 82.</span></p>
+</td></tr>
+</tbody>
+</table>
+</div>
+</div>
+<!-- -*- encoding: utf-8 -*- -->
+<div class="backmatter">
+</div>
+<p class="pfirst" id="pg-end-line"><span>*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK </span><span>CASTES IN INDIA</span><span> ***</span></p>
+<div class="cleardoublepage">
+</div>
+<div class="language-en level-3 pgfooter section" id="a-word-from-project-gutenberg" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<span id="pg-footer"></span><h3 class="level-3 pfirst section-title title"><span>A Word from Project Gutenberg</span></h3>
+<p class="pfirst"><span>We will update this book if we find any errors.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>This book can be found under: </span><a class="reference external" href="https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/63231"><span>https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/63231</span></a></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
+law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
+so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
+States without permission and without paying copyright royalties.
+Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this
+license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™
+electronic works to protect the Project Gutenberg™ concept and
+trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be
+used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific
+permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook,
+complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for
+nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
+performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
+away – you may do practically </span><em class="italics">anything</em><span> in the United States with
+eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject
+to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.</span></p>
+<div class="level-4 section" id="the-full-project-gutenberg-license">
+<span id="project-gutenberg-license"></span><h4 class="level-4 pfirst section-title title"><span>The Full Project Gutenberg License</span></h4>
+<p class="pfirst"><em class="italics">Please read this before you distribute or use this work.</em></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
+Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
+Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
+</span><a class="reference external" href="https://www.gutenberg.org/license">https://www.gutenberg.org/license</a><span>.</span></p>
+<div class="level-5 section" id="section-1-general-terms-of-use-redistributing-project-gutenberg-electronic-works">
+<h5 class="level-5 pfirst section-title title"><span>Section 1. General Terms of Use &amp; Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works</span></h5>
+<p class="pfirst"><strong class="bold">1.A.</strong><span> By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
+destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
+possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
+Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by
+the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
+or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.B.</strong><span> “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.C.</strong><span> The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
+Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
+of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
+works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
+States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
+United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
+claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
+displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
+all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
+that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free
+access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works
+in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project
+Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with
+the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format
+with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it
+without charge with others.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.D.</strong><span> The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
+govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
+countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
+United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
+of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
+distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
+other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no
+representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
+country outside the United States.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.E.</strong><span> Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.E.1.</strong><span> The following sentence, with active links to, or other
+immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear
+prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work
+on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
+phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
+performed, viewed, copied or distributed:</span></p>
+<blockquote>
+<div>
+<p class="pfirst"><span>This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
+and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
+restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
+under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
+eBook or online at </span><a class="reference external" href="https://www.gutenberg.org">https://www.gutenberg.org</a><span> . If you are not
+located in the United States, you'll have to check the laws of the
+country where you are located before using this ebook.</span></p>
+</div>
+</blockquote>
+<p class="pfirst"><strong class="bold">1.E.2.</strong><span> If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
+derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
+contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
+copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
+the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
+redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
+Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
+either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
+obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™
+trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.E.3.</strong><span> If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
+posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and
+distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and
+any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
+will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of
+this work.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.E.4.</strong><span> Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project
+Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a
+part of this work or any other work associated with Project
+Gutenberg™.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.E.5.</strong><span> Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute
+this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg™ License.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.E.6.</strong><span> You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
+any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
+to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other
+than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
+version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ web site
+(</span><a class="reference external" href="https://www.gutenberg.org">https://www.gutenberg.org</a><span>), you must, at no additional cost, fee or
+expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a
+means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original
+“Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include
+the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.E.7.</strong><span> Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.E.8.</strong><span> You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided
+that</span></p>
+<ul class="open">
+<li><p class="first pfirst"><span>You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you
+already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to
+the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to
+donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60
+days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally
+required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments
+should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4,
+“Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation.”</span></p>
+</li>
+<li><p class="first pfirst"><span>You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
+License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
+copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
+all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
+works.</span></p>
+</li>
+<li><p class="first pfirst"><span>You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
+any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
+receipt of the work.</span></p>
+</li>
+<li><p class="first pfirst"><span>You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.</span></p>
+</li>
+</ul>
+<p class="pfirst"><strong class="bold">1.E.9.</strong><span> If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
+Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
+are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
+from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
+Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™
+trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3. below.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.F.</strong></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.F.1.</strong><span> Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend
+considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe
+and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating
+the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
+Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be
+stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to,
+incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a
+copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or
+damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that
+damage or cannot be read by your equipment.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.F.2.</strong><span> LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES – Except for the
+“Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the
+Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the
+Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a
+Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.F.3.</strong><span> LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND – If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
+with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
+with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
+lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
+or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
+opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
+the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
+without further opportunities to fix the problem.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.F.4.</strong><span> Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set
+forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS,’ WITH
+NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.F.5.</strong><span> Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
+damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
+violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
+agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
+limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
+unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
+remaining provisions.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><strong class="bold">1.F.6.</strong><span> INDEMNITY – You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation,
+the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
+production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
+electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
+including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
+the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
+or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
+additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
+Defect you cause.</span></p>
+</div>
+<div class="level-5 section" id="section-2-information-about-the-mission-of-project-gutenberg">
+<h5 class="level-5 pfirst section-title title"><span>Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™</span></h5>
+<p class="pfirst"><span>Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
+computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
+exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
+from people in all walks of life.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™'s
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain
+freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To
+learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and
+how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
+Foundation web page at </span><a class="reference external" href="http://www.pglaf.org">http://www.pglaf.org</a><span> .</span></p>
+</div>
+<div class="level-5 section" id="section-3-information-about-the-project-gutenberg-literary-archive-foundation">
+<h5 class="level-5 pfirst section-title title"><span>Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation</span></h5>
+<p class="pfirst"><span>The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+</span><a class="reference external" href="https://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf">https://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf</a><span> . Contributions to the
+Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to
+the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
+mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
+volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
+locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
+Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email </span><a class="reference external" href="mailto:business@pglaf.org">business@pglaf.org</a><span>. Email
+contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
+Foundation's web site and official page at </span><a class="reference external" href="http://www.pglaf.org">http://www.pglaf.org</a></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>For additional contact information:</span></p>
+<blockquote>
+<div>
+<div class="line-block outermost">
+<div class="line"><span>Dr. Gregory B. Newby</span></div>
+<div class="line"><span>Chief Executive and Director</span></div>
+<div class="line"><a class="reference external" href="mailto:gbnewby@pglaf.org">gbnewby@pglaf.org</a></div>
+</div>
+</div>
+</blockquote>
+</div>
+<div class="level-5 section" id="section-4-information-about-donations-to-the-project-gutenberg-literary-archive-foundation">
+<h5 class="level-5 pfirst section-title title"><span>Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation</span></h5>
+<p class="pfirst"><span>Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without wide spread
+public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing
+the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely
+distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest array of
+equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to
+$5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status
+with the IRS.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
+DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
+state visit </span><a class="reference external" href="https://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate">https://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate</a></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
+donate, please visit: </span><a class="reference external" href="https://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate">https://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate</a></p>
+</div>
+<div class="level-5 section" id="section-5-general-information-about-project-gutenberg-electronic-works">
+<h5 class="level-5 pfirst section-title title"><span>Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works.</span></h5>
+<p class="pfirst"><span>Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg™
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
+the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
+necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
+edition.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's
+eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII,
+compressed (zipped), HTML and others.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Corrected </span><em class="italics">editions</em><span> of our eBooks replace the old file and take over
+the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is
+renamed. </span><em class="italics">Versions</em><span> based on separate sources are treated as new
+eBooks receiving new filenames and etext numbers.</span></p>
+<p class="pnext"><span>Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
+facility:</span></p>
+<blockquote>
+<div>
+<p class="pfirst"><a class="reference external" href="https://www.gutenberg.org">https://www.gutenberg.org</a></p>
+</div>
+</blockquote>
+<p class="pfirst"><span>This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including
+how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe
+to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.</span></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</div>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>