diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-0.txt | 3440 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-0.zip | bin | 58483 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h.zip | bin | 3371077 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/63219-h.htm | 3206 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/cover.jpg | bin | 85992 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p0.jpg | bin | 33649 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p01.jpg | bin | 82655 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p01b.jpg | bin | 77192 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p01c.jpg | bin | 73014 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p02.jpg | bin | 75503 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p02a.jpg | bin | 117408 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p03.jpg | bin | 151787 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p03a.jpg | bin | 90674 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p03b.jpg | bin | 79257 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p04.jpg | bin | 132149 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p04a.jpg | bin | 75317 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p05.jpg | bin | 88134 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p05a.jpg | bin | 75211 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p06.jpg | bin | 116772 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p06a.jpg | bin | 71590 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p07.jpg | bin | 80565 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p07a.jpg | bin | 74467 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p08.jpg | bin | 74201 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p08a.jpg | bin | 65994 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p09.jpg | bin | 65562 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p09a.jpg | bin | 55993 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p10.jpg | bin | 61243 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p10a.jpg | bin | 38537 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p11.jpg | bin | 56082 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p11a.jpg | bin | 68844 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p12.jpg | bin | 43638 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p13.jpg | bin | 29471 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p13a.jpg | bin | 104850 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p14.jpg | bin | 43451 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p15.jpg | bin | 93322 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p15a.jpg | bin | 48029 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p16.jpg | bin | 81739 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p17.jpg | bin | 92685 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p17a.jpg | bin | 101734 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p18.jpg | bin | 58226 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p19.jpg | bin | 36295 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p20.jpg | bin | 99793 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p21.jpg | bin | 107970 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p22.jpg | bin | 99802 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p23.jpg | bin | 93002 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/p24.jpg | bin | 104854 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/63219-h/images/spine.jpg | bin | 7532 -> 0 bytes |
50 files changed, 17 insertions, 6646 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d7b82bc --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +*.txt text eol=lf +*.htm text eol=lf +*.html text eol=lf +*.md text eol=lf diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b2883a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #63219 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/63219) diff --git a/old/63219-0.txt b/old/63219-0.txt deleted file mode 100644 index f46928d..0000000 --- a/old/63219-0.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3440 +0,0 @@ -The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Missouri Archaeologist, Volume 34, No. -1 and 2, December 1972, by Various - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license - - -Title: The Missouri Archaeologist, Volume 34, No. 1 and 2, December 1972 - -Author: Various - -Editor: Robert T. Bray - -Release Date: September 17, 2020 [EBook #63219] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: UTF-8 - -*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE MISSOURI ARCHAEOLOGIST *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THE MISSOURI ARCHAEOLOGIST - - - [Illustration: The Pamplin Kiln] - - Vol. 34 Nos. 1-2 Dec. 1972 - - - THE MISSOURI ARCHAEOLOGIST - - - VOLUME 34, NOS. 1-2 COLUMBIA, MO. DECEMBER, 1972 - - - Editor: Robert T. Bray, University of Missouri-Columbia - - SOCIETY OFFICERS 1972 - Henry W. Hamilton, President - - VICE-PRESIDENTS - - Leonard W. Blake - J. Allen Eichenberger - Dr. H. Lee Hoover - Dr. Carl H. Chapman, Secretary - Edward C. Matthews, Jr. - Clem T. Kelly - Leo J. Roedl - David R. Evans, Treasurer - - TRUSTEES - Harold W. Mohrman, (Chairman) - - Leo O. Anderson - Ramsey Bearden - Dale Belshe - John E. Berry - C. L. Blanton, Jr. - Freddie Bollinger - Fred Brandenburger - Mrs. Mary B. Bruno - C. Warren Cagle - Miss Harryette Campbell - R. I. Colborn - J. L. Connelly - Paul Corbin - J. M. Crick - Mrs. W. L. Davidson - W. B. Debo - Jack Dennis - Richard V. Dolby - Terrance Dyche - Benedict Ellis - Jim D. Feagins - Dr. Raymond Felling - Forrest Femmer - Charles R. Fiorita - Maynard A. Fisher - Michael R. Fisher - Howell Geiger - Henry H. Gerdes - J. W. Gerhardt - Harold Green - T. M. Hamilton - Dr. E. B. Hanan - Harry L. Harner - Dr. M. M. Hart - Dr. William Hayes - O. Lee Herberger - J. P. Herring - Leo P. Hopper - James G. Houser - Dr. Shelby Hughes - Elmo Ingenthron - Sam C. Irvine - Sam G. Jones - James F. Keefe - Thomas Keel, Jr. - David Kimbrough - George W. Kirk - Claude Knoles - Miss Margaret Lawlor - I. H. Lehmer - Dr. James L. Lowe - Frank Magre - Winton O. Meyer - Steve Miller - George W. Nichols - Dr. Peter Nichols - Charles V. Orr - W. L. Philyaw - Mrs. Howard Platz - Art Province - Julian D. Pyatt - Nelson Reed - Donovan Reynolds - Ralph G. Roberts - Paul V. Sellers - Dr. Francis L. Stubbs - John W. Taylor - Floyd Vavak - John C. Vinton - George Von Hoffman, Jr. - James Walden - - PRESERVATION OF SITES COMMITTEE - J. J. McKinny (Chairman) - - Joseph B. Abell - Dr. Hugh L. Cutler - William R. Denslow - Robert L. Elgin - Arthur L. Freeman, Jr. - Genevieve Huss - Charles E. Martien - Haysler A. Poague - Robert M. Seelen - George U. Shelby, Jr. - Allen B. Soper - Frank Stonner - C. H. Turner - Art. L. Wallhausen, Jr. - - - - - CONTENTS - - - CLAY PIPES FROM PAMPLIN by Henry W. Hamilton and Jean Tyree - Hamilton 1 - Acknowledgments 1 - Introduction 2 - The Home Pipemaking Industry 3 - Home Industry Pipe Making Methods 7 - The Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company 8 - Factory Machinery 11 - Factory Firing and Glazing 12 - Reed Stems 12 - Pipes Made By The Factory 12 - Factory Price List of Pipes and Jobbers Discounts, As of 1941 13 - Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 14 - Conclusions 21 - Bibliography 23 - THE UTLAUT SITE (23SA162W): AN ONEOTA-HISTORIC MISSOURI BURIAL - SITE By Patricia J. O’Brien and Kevin Hart 48 - Burial Descriptions 48 - Discussion 61 - References Cited 65 - Appendix: Skeletal Remains from the Utlaut Site by Kevin Hart - and Clark Larsen 67 - A REPORT OF SALVAGE INVESTIGATIONS AT ST. CHARLES, MISSOURI By J. - M. Shippee 75 - - - - - ILLUSTRATIONS - - - CLAY PIPES FROM PAMPLIN By Henry W. Hamilton and Jean Tyree - Hamilton - _Plate_ _Page_ - 1. Tools of the Home Pipemaking Industry 26 - 2. Pamplin Pipe from the steamboat _Bertrand_ 27 - 3. Stencils on the Box of Pamplin Pipes from the _Bertrand_ 27 - 4. The Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company, Inc. 28 - 5. Kiln of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe Company 29 - 6. Pipe Molding Machine from Pamplin Factory 30 - 7. Saggers from the Pamplin Factory 31 - 8. Advertising Brochure, Pamplin Pipe Company 32 - 9. The “original” Powhatan and other Pamplin Pipe Forms 33 - 10. Price List of Pamplin Company Pipe Forms 34 - 11. “Tomahawk Pipe,” 1941 Brochure 35 - 12. Sales Tag for “Original” Powhatan Pipe 36 - 13. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 37 - 14. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 38 - 15. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 39 - 16. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 40 - 17. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 41 - 18. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 42 - 19. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 43 - 20. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 44 - 21. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 45 - 22. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 46 - 23. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms 47 - - - _Tables_ _Page_ - 1. Sources of Pipes and Relative Numbers available for Examination 14 - 2. Identifications Appearing on Certain Pamplin Pipes 15 - - - THE UTLAUT SITE (23SA162W): AN ONEOTA-HISTORIC MISSOURI BURIAL - SITE By Patricia J. O’Brien and Kevin Hart - _Figures_ _Page_ - 1. Floodplain of the Missouri River with Locations of 23SA4, - 23SA162W and 23SA162 49 - 2. Test Excavations at the Utlaut Site 50 - 3. Burial 1, 23SA162W 51 - 4. Artifacts from the Utlaut Site 53 - 5. Burial 2, 23SA162W 54 - 6. Pottery Vessels from the Utlaut Site 55 - 7. Burial 3, 23SA162W 56 - 8. Burial 4, 23SA162W 58 - 9. Burial 6, 23SA162W 59 - 10. Pottery Vessels Associated with Burial 6 60 - 11. Tibiae of Burial 1 68 - 12. Skull Profiles of Burial 3 71 - - - _Tables_ _Page_ - 1. Post-Cranial Measurements and Indices for Skeletal Material - from 23SA162W 73 - 2. Cranial Measurements and Indices, Burials, 2, 6 73 - 3. Comparison of Male Stature for Oneota Indians 74 - - - A REPORT OF SALVAGE INVESTIGATIONS AT ST. CHARLES, MISSOURI By J. - M. Shippee - _Figures_ _Page_ - 1. Pit A Pottery 77 - 2. Pits B and D Artifacts 79 - 3. Pit D Pottery 81 - 4. Pottery from Pit D and from Surface of Road 82 - - - - - CLAY PIPES FROM PAMPLIN - - - by Henry W. Hamilton & Jean Tyree Hamilton - - - ACKNOWLEDGMENTS - -We wish to express appreciation to all of the following for their help -and assistance in the preparation of this report. The contributions of -some are discussed in detail in the text, but we are grateful to each -and every one. - -Miss Wilsie Thornton, Mrs. Bess Franklin Mattox, Stuart M. Farrar and -Jack Price, Pamplin, Virginia. - -Dr. Clyde G. O’Brien, M.D.; Calvin Robinson, retired editor; Ray Noble -and William Sperry, Appomattox, Virginia. - -Mrs. Aldah B. Gordon, Clerk Circuit Court, Appomattox County, -Appomattox, Virginia. - -Vernon C. Womack, Clerk Circuit Court, Prince Edward County, Farmville, -Virginia. - -Alford L. Rector, Charles H. Meadows, and Mrs. Charles S. Martin, -Appomattox Court House, National Historic Park, Virginia. - -Edward A. Chappell, Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission, Richmond, -Virginia. - -Edward F. Heite, formerly with Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission. - -Francis B. Fitzgerald, Suffolk, Virginia. - -David Dautenhahn, Marshall, Missouri - -John W. Walker, John W. Griffin and Richard D. Faust, Southeast -Archaeological Center, National Park Service, Macon, Georgia. - -J. Paul Hudson, Jamestown National Historic Park, Virginia. - -Rex L. Wilson, Acting Chief, Division of Archaeology and Anthropology, -National Park Service, Washington. - -John C. Ewers, Smithsonian Institution, Washington. - -Jerome E. Petsche, National Park Service, Washington. - -Charles Phillips, Williamstown, Massachusetts. - -Miss Mary M. Watts, Times-Dispatch, Richmond, Virginia. - -Robert L. Saville, Jr., Lawyers Title Insurance Corp, Richmond Virginia. - -Morton L. Wallerstein and Ralph Dombrower, Richmond, Partners in the -last factory operation. - -Microfilm Department, Virginia State Library, Richmond. - -Miss Eleanor Thompson, Assistant Librarian, Missouri Valley College, -Marshall, Missouri. - -Mrs. Dorothy Erdmann, Summit County Historical Society, Akron, Ohio. - -Floyd Painter, Editor, _The Chesopiean_, Norfolk, Virginia. - -Ronald A. Thomas, State Archaeologist, Dover, Delaware. - -Mrs. Elizabeth Schick and L. T. Alexander, Archaeological Society of -Delaware, Wilmington. - -R. H. Landon, Minnesota Archaeological Society, Minneapolis. - -Howard A. MacCord, Sr., Archaeology Society of Virginia, Richmond, -Virginia. - -Ronald R. Switzer, Bertrand Conservation Laboratory, DeSoto National -Wildlife Refuge, Missouri Valley, Iowa. - -The photography is by T. M. Hamilton, Miami, Missouri, except where -otherwise noted. - -To the many others who have helped, we also wish to express our thanks. - - - INTRODUCTION - -This is presented as an aid in the identification of clay pipes from the -general area of Pamplin, Virginia, that might appear in archaeological -and historic sites. Interest in these pipes has been stimulated by their -being reported as found in various sites in the western United States. - -The circumstances under which this information has been gathered and the -fact that it has been a number of years since clay pipes were made here, -either as a home industry or commercially by the Pamplin Smoking Pipe -and Manufacturing Company, leave much to be desired. On the other hand, -in our work we have inspected a total of 4,451 Pamplin pipes; of this -number 39% were from the factory grounds, and 61% were from the Thornton -Store Site and represented the home industry, so we feel that the 39 -forms presented represent at least a majority of the pipe forms made at -Pamplin. - -This is not to say that a similar form could not have been made -elsewhere; however the style, the generally heavier and thicker -character of the piece, and the finish, or lack of it, as well as the -usual deep red color of the Virginia clay, would seem to make these -pipes distinctive. - -Under the conditions in which these pipes were retrieved it is obvious -that the numbers of the different forms located give little indication -of the relative numbers of the different styles that were manufactured, -the popularity of the various styles, or the relative time of their -manufacture. - -Nearly all of the pipes examined were retrieved by excavation, by people -who simply happened to become interested; this is equally true whether -the pipes had been made by the factory and excavated out of fill on the -old factory grounds, or whether they were made at the homes and -excavated from the basement of the old Thornton Store, which through the -years had taken them in trade for merchandise. - -In some cases among the pipes examined there were not more than one, or -a few, examples of a certain form. In other cases there were hundreds. -Among the examples available to us there was generally little variation -in size within the same form. We have illustrated the largest and the -smallest, since this also gives an opportunity to note minor variations -that may exist between different molds for the same pipe form. However, -a rather wide variation in size was present in that shown as (Plate 13 -A), the “Original” Powhatan, where a total of 12 gradations from largest -to smallest were found. - -The predominant color of the pipes is dark red. A lighter color is -infrequently present, running from almost yellow, to salmon, to light -brown. The very dark, almost black coloration of some is said to come -either from minerals present in the soil of this area, to which the -pipes presented here had been subjected since nearly all had been many -years underground, or from actual fire that had fallen into the saggers -of the Company kiln, or the iron pots in which the pipes had been fired -in the home industry. - -During the last years of factory operation “some white clay from either -West Virginia or Kentucky was shipped in by railroad”. This resulted in -pipes of a lighter color, at times light grey to white. Apparently no -pipes made from this particular clay were seen by us, except possibly -those illustrated in Plate 23 AJ. - - - THE HOME PIPEMAKING INDUSTRY - -Well established local tradition indicates that clay pipemaking in the -homes, for home and neighborhood use, started almost as soon as the -first settlers reached the area, and after the suitability of the local -clay was discovered. Initial county organization in this part of -Virginia was well underway by the 1740’s. - -Bradshaw’s _History of Prince Edward County_, Virginia, 1955, p. 5 -states, _Batho Austin road to be cleared from the Appomattox River near -Colonel Richard Randolph’s quarter to Hill’s Fork on Vaughan’s Creek by -all who lived near the route and were not employed on other roads. -1742._ - -Vernon C. Womack, Clerk of the Circuit Court, Prince Edward County, in a -personal letter states, “Since the south fork of Vaughan’s Creek -originates a short distance from where the pipe factory was later -located in Pamplin, this might be the starting point. John Wood’s map of -Prince Edward County, dated 1820 which shows that part that was later -cut off to form Appomattox County, gives a detail network of roads -through Kelso’s Old Store, which appears to be near the present location -of Pamplin.” - -_There were stores at Sandy River, Wm. and Samuel Matthew had a store at -Walker’s Church, and Kelso’s Old Store was between Walker’s Church and -Merriman’s Shop_ (now Pamplin).” The statement is footnoted _John Wood -map_, 1820. (Bradshaw, 1955:319). - -_Merriman’s Shop Post Office, 94 miles from Richmond, 185 miles from -Washington._ (Martin, 1835:269). - -_Advertisement for renewal of bids for rural route for port office in -Merriman’s Shop in 1843-1848_ (Bradshaw, 1955:315). - -The area that was later to become Appomattox County had been, -successively, included in the areas of several earlier and larger -counties. Appomattox County was formed in 1845. The railroad came -through Merriman’s Shop in 1854, and was renamed Pamplin. The Appomattox -County Courthouse burned and the county records were destroyed by fire -on February 2, 1892 (Communication from Mrs. Aldah Gordon). - -Mrs. Bess Franklin Mattox reported, “Nicholas Pamplin, a resident of -Merriman’s Shop, was the only citizen who permitted the railroad to go -through his land without charge and so the village was renamed for him” -(Mattox, personal communication). For a time it was known as Pamplin -Depot, then Pamplin City, finally simply Pamplin. - -The home manufacture of pipes has had a long history in this part of -Virginia and can be considered as well underway by the 1740s. It existed -long before the Company came to Pamplin and continued after the Company -had ceased operations, or as long as there was an active demand for clay -pipes. - -The Home Industry finally came to a close in 1953. “Mrs. Betty Price of -Appomattox County was the last to make pipes. I have a mold used by her. -She made them from childhood and in her prime could make 40,000 pipes -per year, having been taught by her mother in 1866 when she was eight -years old. Her mother had made them a lifetime before her. In the last -year of Mrs. Betty Price’s life, 1953, she made 500 pipes at the age of -95. They were made from clay from her own farm.” (Personal letter from -Dr. Clyde G. O’Brien of Appomattox, and her son, Jack Price of Pamplin). - -A column by the _News-Leader_ correspondent from Appomattox, April 30, -(year unknown) said, _Hollywood bar reached all the way to Pamplin to -get Mrs. Betty Price’s pipes for use by the Indians in the movie, -“Northwest Mounted Police”. Cecil B. DeMille’s research man ferreted out -the Powhatan pipe some months before the film went into production. -Several dozen were ordered. Frank Lloyd also bought pipes to be used in -the production of “Howards of Virginia”._ - -Practically speaking, all of the pipes made at the homes were made by -white women, and from about the time of the first settlement of the -territory, as the special suitability of the local clay for that purpose -was early discovered. - -Miss Wilsie Thornton of Pamplin said that this industry had become -especially important after the War Between the States, because with so -many men having been killed and the area in such straitened -circumstances, the women were badly in need of some means of making a -living. The pipes they made could be traded at several general stores, -or sold for a few cents, and there was no cost for materials. - -One such establishment at which the local women disposed of their pipes -was J. R. Franklin & Co., of Pamplin. Some of these pipes were recovered -when the cargo of the sternwheeler, _Bertrand_, which sank in the -Missouri River at Port La Force, Nebraska, April 1, 1865, (Petsche, -1970:1) was salvaged in 1968-69. The official list of artifacts -recovered in the salvage operation, supplied by Jerome E. Petsche, -National Park Service, who was in charge of that operation shows: - -_Pipes, Smoking; Several types and sizes recovered; briars and clay; one -lot included clay bowls exclusively, others contained stems and bowls. -Consignee: Vivian and Simpson, Virginia City. Manufacturer’s -stenciling_: ‘THE CELEBRATED VIRGINIA POWHATAN (CLAY), J. R. FRANKLIN & -CO., SOLE AGENTS FOR THE MANUFACTURERS, PAMPLIN DEPOT, APPOMATTOX -COUNTY, VA.’ Field lot numbers MPC 104, MPC 358, FSC 171. - -The following description of the pipe shipment on the _Bertrand_ was -provided by Ronald R. Switzer, Director, Bertrand Conservation -Laboratory, National Park Service, Missouri Valley, Iowa. - -“The pipes are of one type and design (Plate 2). Forty pipe bowls plus -136 fragments ... all but 15 are chipped or broken, condition otherwise -good. Clay, predominantly grayish-tan, mottled with brick red and brown. -Paste soft, fine, and uniform, ... exterior has soft sheen. -Preservation: Brushed with soft bristle brush in running tap water to -remove mud.” (Switzer, personal communication). - -This pipe is similar to (Plate 19 U); however, there are slight -variations due to differences in individual molds made for production of -the same pipe form. - -The two pipe forms (Plate 19 T & U), were the only examples we found -that carried the peculiar pinkish-gray tan color, and they were found -only among the pipes made by the Home Industry. They were probably made -of clay from the same source and by the same individual, since home -pipemakers usually dug their clay on their own premises, and the -condition of the pipes, after a century in mud and moisture, indicates -that the work was done well. - -The shipment was contained in a wooden box, which was approximately 15½ -inches long, 8½ inches wide, and 8 inches tall (Plate 2). The stenciling -on the box is faint, but legible. - -“Lettering on the top of the box indicated the consignee but is so faded -that it was impossible to obtain a good photograph; however the stencil -once read,—B. A. L. Vivian & Simpson, Virginia City, M. T.” (Plate 3) -(Switzer, personal communication). - -“One end of the box was lettered, No. 1, 216, M. Size” (Plate 3). The -meaning of this can only be conjectured, however it may have indicated -shipment No. 1, to this consignee; containing 216 pipes; of Medium size. - -The stencils identifying the consignor, J. R. Franklin & Co., appeared -on both sides of the box and were identical (Plate 3). The same, except -in abbreviated form, appeared diagonally on one end of the box. - -The account book of the store at New Store, Virginia, about 23 miles -northeast of Pamplin, which is in the collections at Appomattox -Courthouse, records that on Sept. 1, 1866, I. H. Schenault was paid -$8.00 for 1,600 pipes, and later, (apparently the same day) was paid -$8.75 for 2,175 pipes. The latter was evidently a partial and immediate -“in trade” transaction. - -So in the Pamplin area in the 1860s general stores were taking clay -pipes made in the home industry, allowing about ½¢ each in trade for -commodities, and at least in one instance were shipping them west for -use by the miners in the gold fields. - -Mrs. Betty Price has said that the Powhatan “Original” (Plate 13 A) the -“Hamburg” (Plate 14 F) and the “Zuvee” or “Zoo” (Plate 19 T) were some -of the first pipe forms made in the area. (_News-Leader_, April 30, year -unknown). - -Many of the clay pipes made at homes near Pamplin were traded for -commodities at the Thornton General Store in Pamplin, and this store was -truly “general”, for it handled, in addition to groceries, everything -from threshing machines and horsepower mills to silk thread. - -Miss Wilsie Thornton had a copy of her Father’s letterhead: the letter -was dated, Jan. 9, 1892. The letterhead reads,— - - _W. D. THORNTON, DEALER. - General Merchandise and Agricultural Implements. - Wholesale dealer in All Styles of Clay Pipes and Stems - Manufacturer’s Agent for - Aultman and Taylor Threshers, Horse Power and Farm Engines. - Also Buckeye Reapers & Mowers & Thornmill Wagons._ - -“The pipes made by the local women,” Miss Thompson said, “were traded to -the Thornton Store for the necessities of life. The pipes were stored in -the basement of the store and packed in barrels, in either pine needles -or sawdust, and shipped to the Baltimore Bargain House, or to other -wholesale houses. From the wholesale houses they were shipped to the -Cotton States and to the West. Large orders were filled for a tobacco -factory in Pennsylvania, where they sold bags of tobacco with the -pipes.” - -Pamplin pipes have been reported from the sites of Fort Laramie, -Wyoming; Fort Sanders, Wyoming; Fort Stambaugh, Wyoming; Fort Phil -Kearny, Wyoming; Fort Union, New Mexico; Fort Sully, South Dakota; and -Fort Davis, Texas (Wilson, 1971). - -Miss Thornton’s parents were married in 1874, but the store was already -in operation at that time. Her father continued operation until his -death, December 16, 1897; after that the store was run by her brother. A -bank, the “Farmer’s and Merchant’s National Bank” was also operated in -the store. In later years the building became a drug store. - -Finally with time and disuse the old building came down and erosion, -with perhaps some intentional filling of the area, took place. So the -site of the old general store, which in its heyday had meant so much to -Pamplin and Appomattox County and its people in their daily living, -became simply a vacant area. - -Some years ago Miss Thornton had made a train trip and met an old -colored woman in a rest room to which they had both gone to smoke. (When -we met her, Miss Thornton chain-smoked at the age of 89). The colored -woman had a sack of tobacco and pulled out a clay pipe which Miss -Thornton recognized as of the kind that her father used to take in -trade, so she asked the woman if it was a good one. - -The woman answered, “Law, yes, but I can’t buy them any more!” so Miss -Thornton told her that it was made long ago, in her home town, and that -she would try to get her some. - -Her next problem was to find some pipes. After several days she thought -of the pipes that she felt sure were covered with earth and still in the -basement of her father’s old store, so she talked to her cousin and next -door neighbor, Mrs. Bess Franklin Mattox. - -Shortly after that, they dug at the site. Mrs. Mattox thinks it was -around 1958, though possibly 2 years earlier. “Erosion through the years -had covered the pipes and when we first started to dig we found none, -then there they were, under the dirt. We found two or three sugar -barrels full. Tar was on a few of the pipes, from road tar that was also -stored in the basement and spilled”. (This tar, in hard-dried rough -spots, is present on some of the pipes we examined; however it chips off -readily and leaves the pipe relatively clean). - -So the colored woman who couldn’t find a Pamplin pipe to buy received -“either 15 or 16” and Miss Thornton received a letter of thanks from her -from Atlanta. - -Miss Thornton still had approximately 1,450 of the home manufactured -pipes for us to see when we visited her in July 1969, and Mrs. Mattox -had a few. - -Dr. Clyde G. O’Brien of Appomattox has had a lifelong interest in the -clay pipes of his area and in the history of their manufacture. He has a -collection of pipes as well as two pipe molds, and has given us much -information. - - - HOME INDUSTRY PIPE MAKING METHODS - -We asked Dr. O’Brien for an account of the method of making pipes in the -homes. The following is his contribution, in a letter dated March 11, -1971. - -“I talked to Jack Price, age 86, he had worked in the plant for years. -His mother, Mrs. Betty Price, and grandmother made pipes at home in -Pamplin. - -“The clay was made up and put into molds, when the pipe was removed from -the mold the shaper was used to smooth mold marks, if the pipe was to be -identified with ‘Original’, ‘Hayiti’, or some other marking this was -impressed on the base with a stamp at this time. The pipe was then -sun-dried on a board in summer, or in the stove oven in winter. Then -after they had ‘set-up’ the pipes were put into an iron pot, the pots -were put into an oven in the back yard and dry chestnut wood was placed -around the pots and this was then set on fire. They did not have a -thermometer so he did not know the temperature, but when the wood had -burned completely the pipes were brought out to cool. - -“If a piece of wood fell into the burning pot and started to smoke it -was removed at once to keep from blackening or staining the pipes. - -“After the pipes cooled they were brought into the house and Mr. Price -said that when the pipes were poured out of the pot in which they were -baked, to the floor, they would ring or chime when they hit against each -other. - -“The pipes were then waxed with bee’s wax and mutton tallow and then -polished with a woolen cloth, and the children helped.” - -In all of this, Bob Davis of Pamplin, age 91, in talking to John W. -Walker in 1962, had concurred. He said, “The pipes were molded, trimmed, -put on a board and dried in the sun, baked in iron pots, waxed, and -rubbed. The pipes were made all through the country, the local stores -bought and shipped them, and the Factory would buy these ‘country -pipes’.” Here was more direct evidence that the Factory, on occasion at -least, bought and shipped pipes made by the Home Industry (Walker, -personal communication). - -There were, however, two men who made pipes. - -Dr. O’Brien’s father Thomas O’Brien, was born in 1843. When he came back -after the War, about 1865, he made his own mold of white-oak with lead -lining and made pipes for his own use. - -According to Miss Wilsie Thornton, a Mr. Rodgers was making molds and -pipes until about 1938 as a hobby. One of them was in the form of an -Indian head (Plate 23 AL). The “peach seed” pipe (Plate 23 AM) is also -thought to be one of his manufacture. - - - THE PAMPLIN SMOKING PIPE AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY - -In the middle 1850’s that part of Ohio that surrounds Akron was the -pipemaking capital of the United States, with at least six clay products -companies producing them (Blair, 1965:26-30). The leading producer of -clay smoking pipes in the Akron vicinity was the E. H. Merrill Co., -which had been producing pottery objects since its founding in 1831. In -1843 or 1844 Calvin, brother of E. H. Merrill, invented a machine for -making pipes which greatly increased the output of the company and gave -quite an advantage over its competitors (Blair, 1965:3). - -The Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company, Inc., was -established by the Akron Smoking Pipe Company of Akron, Ohio, when they -built the plant at Pamplin. - -That the clay in Appomattox County was well suited to pipe manufacture -was well known. The establishment of this plant was no doubt the result -of the Company’s realization of the availability of the fine red clay -from which the local women were producing pipes, a clay that could be -used without even sifting. - -When the Pamplin Factory was established is quite uncertain. Examination -of the microfilm of newspapers of the area that were available from the -Virginia State Library, beginning February 3, 1869 through December 25, -1896, gave no clue to the date of the establishment of the Pamplin -Factory, nor did county records, probably due to the fire of 1892. - -_Sometime immediately prior to 1880 William Merrill of Akron, Ohio, -undoubtedly a member of the pipe making family, established a pipe -making factory at Pamplin._ (Omwake, 1967:23). Our Pamplin informants -were of the opinion that the Akron plant was devoted to the manufacture -of drain tile after the pipe machinery was moved to Pamplin. - -Bob Davis of Pamplin, born 1871, in an interview with John W. Walker in -September 1962, said, “I was a kid when the factory came in”. Timewise -this would be in general agreement with Omwake’s estimate for the date -of the establishment of the factory at Pamplin. - -That Pamplin pipes were also available from Akron in 1893 is evidenced -by a letterhead of the Akron Smoking Pipe Company, dated June 26, 1893, -showing examples of two clay pipes similar to Plate 22 AF & AG, (Blair, -1965:36). A communication from the Summit County Historical Society -reports, “The Akron Smoking Pipe Co. is recorded as being in business -from 1891 to 1895, and were manufacturers of stone, Powhatan Clay, and -corn cob tobacco pipes. Daily capacity 100,000 pipes. General offices, -Akron, Ohio. Factories, Pamplin City, Virginia; Mogadore, Ohio.” - -Statements in company literature are also confusing. In a leaflet which -carries a testimonial for their pipes, dated April 28, 1941 and price -lists “effective November 15, 1941”, the statement is made, _from -careful search of the records, this factory started more than 200 years -ago ... the present plant has been in operation for 44 years. Skilled -American labor is used in a modern, day-lit plant with special attention -to cleanliness, sanitation, and ideal working conditions_ (Plate 8). - -This would give a date for the “present plant” of 1897, but it also -suggests that an earlier plant had been rebuilt or replaced. (An undated -and unidentified news clipping does state that at some time the pipe -plant had burned). Company literature also states, “Established 1739” -(Plate 8). This obviously cannot refer to the establishment of the -plant, nor even to the mother plant at Akron, since pottery was first -produced in Summit County, Ohio, in 1828 (Blair, 1965:2). The Company -may simply have been employing “poet’s license” and appropriated a date -which they felt representative of the start of the Home Pipe Making -Industry in the Pamplin area. - -The _Times-Virginian_ of Appomattox, date unknown, carried a news -article, _Pamplin Clay Pipe Plant once termed largest in the World_. The -_Farmville Herald_ of March 29, 1935 stated, ... _the output of the Clay -Pipe Factory at Pamplin is 1,000,000 a month, when it is running full -time. In the roster of business in Virginia, this factory is mentioned -as the largest clay pipe factory in the United States, and so far as is -known, in the world._ - -At one point in the history of the plant, pipes were sold to England as -well as some other countries in Europe. - -Also vague has been the terminal date of the Pamplin Company; it is -variously given locally as 1948 to 1951. - -There is a contemporary news article on the factory published in the -_Richmond Times-Dispatch_, April 21, 1946. _A History of Appomattox, -Virginia_, published 1948, states, _The Akron Pipe Factory of Pamplin -holds the title of manufacturing the finest clay smoking pipes in the -world, known as the ‘Powhatan’_ (Featherstone, 1948:44). - -In a personal letter to the writers, John C. Ewers said, “During my -field work on the Fort Peck Reservation in Montana, in 1953, I first -learned of the Pamplin clay pipes. One of my Indian informants told me -about selling them when he was working at a trading post on the -reservation during the first decade of the present century.... - -“Later I visited the trading post at Oswego on the Fort Peck -Reservation. There the proprietor showed me the illustrated price list -of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company, Inc. He showed me -the only type of pipe he still had in stock—the ‘Century of Progress’, -Chicago type (Plate 23 AJ). He said the manufacturer wrote him in 1951 -that he planned to go back into the manufacture of the other styles, -which the Assiniboine preferred.” - -The Tomahawk pipe was a good specialty item for sale at such events as -fairs and expositions, and the Company’s sales to the “Century of -Progress” in Chicago in 1933 must have been excellent, even though they -had not sold all they had made in anticipation of that demand. The bowl, -necessarily narrow and elongated since it was in the blade of the -tomahawk, did not recommend it to serious smokers, nor to the -Assiniboine. - -It would seem evident that these pipes were left over from the -production of the Company in 1933, that their regular pipe models had by -this time been sold out, and that the Company was already in a State of -quiescence in 1951. - -Dr. Clyde G. O’Brien of Appomattox stated that the Company ceased -operations in 1951. - -The Charter of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company shows -that it was incorporated by the Commonwealth of Virginia on the 15th day -of August, 1929. The officers at that time were, J. V. Lewis, Pres., -Prospect, Virginia; J. W. Franklin, V.Pres., Pamplin; L. N. Ligon, -V.Pres., Pamplin; T. R. Pugh, Secy-Treas., Pamplin. - -The purposes of the Company then were, among other things, to deal in -wood of all kinds, own timber lands, contract to do construction work, -deal in real estate, _and to buy and sell all kinds of necessary -material ... and operate all the necessary equipment and machinery for -the purpose of manufacturing clay pipes, crocks, and earthenware_.... -(Charter Book No. 1, Page 108, Appomattox County, Virginia). The -corporation (Charter No. 34565-16) was dissolved by the State -Corporation Commission, at the request of the stockholders, on February -21, 1952. - -A personal communication, February 23, 1972, from Morton L. Wallerstein -who with Ralph L. Dombrower as corporate officers were the last active -operators of the pipe factory, states, “Mr. Dombrower and myself, as -sole stockholders, started the operation in 1938 and baked the clay -pipes up to the time of the enactment of the Minimum Wage Law by -Congress. At that time it was apparent that the part-time workers, -largely farm girls and boys who worked in the afternoon, would cease to -be employed because the pipes could not be marketed under the wages -required to be paid. - -“However, Mrs. Betty Price and another woman made the hand-made clay -pipes at their homes, which pipes Mr. Dombrower bought after 1938 and -very cleverly boxed in antique fashion and sold them for some years. -However, unfortunately the women who made these pipes died and they were -no longer made. - -“The factory, itself, did not manufacture pipes beyond the period stated -above. The property was sold in 1947 and the corporation was dissolved -in 1952.” - -Apparently then, the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company -ceased all activity in 1951, having been in existence slightly more than -70 years. - -Some time after the closing, the main factory building was used as a -garage. In July of 1969 this frame building, with the name “Pamplin -Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Co., Inc., American Indian Clay Smoking -Pipes” still painted above the entrance, stood unoccupied; the crumbling -old smokestack and large round kiln of brick construction were still -there (Plates 4 & 5). Another building which had served Company purposes -had been destroyed. - - - FACTORY MACHINERY - -The machinery to mold smoking pipes and bottles was invented by Calvin -J. Merrill of the E. H. Merrill Pottery, Summit County, Ohio, in 1843 -(Blair, 1965:3). - -The pipe machine was simple: the individual metal molds in the foot -powered mechanism could be changed to vary the pipe form. The whole was -contained in a simple wooden bench (Plate 6). Miss Wilsie Thornton felt -that a man working such a machine could produce thousands of pipes per -day. It is unknown how many such machines were used by the factory, nor -how many people were employed since ideas of our informants varied; -however, the best estimate seems to be 8 to 10 machines, with employees -varying from 10 to 40, depending upon the press of work and the rush of -orders at any given time. - -Bob Davis of Pamplin, in the interview with John W. Walker said, “Old -man Taz Harvey made the Powhatan mold. He had a shop and made many -molds”. - - - FACTORY FIRING AND GLAZING - -The pipes were packed in round stoneware crocks or saggers made from -fireclay, and the saggers were stacked alternately around the kiln. The -saggers were some eight inches high and 16 to 18 inches in diameter -(Plate 7). There was an opening in the top of the kiln through which, in -glazing, salt was put when the pipes were hot. They were fired some 24 -or 48 hours (Miss Thornton’s statement). - -Mrs. Maddox said: “As a child I used to go with a colored man who worked -with us and also for the factory, and watch him throw salt down a hole -in the top of the kiln on the pipes to make a glaze.” - -At a high temperature the salt vaporized and combined with the silica in -the body of the clay to form a glassy or ‘silicate glaze’. The kiln was -fired 32 to 36 hours before maximum temperature was reached; it was -cooled the same period to prevent crazing (minute cracking) of the glaze -(Blair, 1965:15). This description of glazing refers to stoneware in the -mid-nineteenth century potteries near Akron, Ohio. However since the -Pamplin kiln was the same sort of “walk-in” kiln, the detail would fit, -and it is substantiated by Miss Thornton’s statement of firing time. - -From the scarcity of glazed pipes among the many that we examined, we -conclude that the majority were finished without glazing. - - - REED STEMS - -The stems sold with the factory pipes were made from switch cane -_Arundinara gigantea_ known locally as reed and once abundant in the -Great Dismal Swamp in southeastern Virginia (R. H. Woodling to Chas. H. -Meadows, May 15, 1969). (The stems used with the pipes made by the Home -Industry usually came from the same source.) - -The reeds were cut in 12 foot lengths by men in boats, allowed to dry -for six months, cut in lengths and reamed out. Some were put in a -machine and bent (Miss Thornton, Dr. O’Brien). - -Cork plugs or washers were used in the base of the pipes to hold the -stem in place. Some were still in place in pipes we examined. A plug -mill, a high pressure machine, extruded the cork plugs which were cut -off by wire (Heite). - -(Replacement reed stems for clay, hickory, or corn cob pipes, retailed -in the grocery stores in Lexington, Missouri, for 10¢ per dozen about -1916). - - - PIPES MADE BY THE FACTORY - -A number of people and institutions with varying numbers of Pamplin -Factory pipes in their possession have given us an opportunity to -examine them. The largest number of specimens were in the hands of the -following. - -Our attention was first called to these pipes in 1968 at the Craft Club -in Arrow Rock, Missouri, where some of them appeared for sale as an -unusual item. They obviously had been underground, for the bowls and -bases were still filled with earth containing numerous rootlets growing -through the pipe cavities. - -It was learned that the pipes had been supplied by Francis B. -Fitzgerald, Suffolk, Virginia; David I. Dautenhahn, Marshall, Missouri, -put us in touch with him. As a youngster, Fitzgerald had on various -occasions visited his grandfather’s farm, which was near the Pamplin -Factory, and had played in the water of a little creek on pipe plant -property. In so doing, he discovered that there were numerous clay pipes -in a bank which apparently had been placed in the creek to form a dam. -(The dam was probably for the purpose of retaining water to mix with the -clay). He had hundreds of these pipes. Practically none would seem to -have been rejects—how or why they got into the dirt which was used to -make the fill is unknown. Through the years Fitzgerald had made a -selection of forms representative of this group, all of which he made -available to us. - -Since that time an owner of the pipe plant property had secured many -pipes, later acquired by the Appomattox National Historic Park. They -were made available to us by Alford L. Rechtor, Superintendent. - -The Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission supplied photographs of some -Pamplin pipes, as well as photographs of a pipe mold and pipe maker’s -bench (Plate 6) and saggers (Plate 7). We were granted the use of these -by Edward F. Heite and Edward A. Chappell of that institution. - -John W. Walker of the National Park Service, who had worked in the area -and become interested in the pipes made there, provided us with a copy -of his field notes and some examples of pipes. - -John C. Ewers of the Smithsonian Institution had visited Pamplin. He -gave us much information and showed us several pipe forms from the area -that are in the collections of that institution. - -Rex L. Wilson, National Park Service, loaned us a copy of his -manuscript, “Clay Tobacco Pipes from Fort Laramie, Wyoming and Related -Sites”, in which he identified some specimens as having come from -Pamplin. - - - FACTORY PRICE LIST OF PIPES AND JOBBERS DISCOUNTS, AS OF 1941. - -The Company’s price list of November 1941 listed “The Powhatan Machine -Made”, fitted with cork closures and 10″ reed stems, bowls trade-marked, -packed 50 to box, 25¢ retailer. Price $6.00 per box.” -(Plate 10). - -Five other models were listed, “5 in. reed stems, packed 100 to box, 15¢ -retailer. Price $3.00 per box.” Two models were listed similarly, but -10¢ retailers, price $2.50 per box. Two other 10¢ retailers were listed -at $2.70 per box, and one model at $2.85 per box but the suggested -retail price was still 10¢ each. - -One model, their “Ole Virginny Hamburg”, was offered in finest -fire-clay, hard-burned, white, simulates meerschaum, also in red. -Similar to “Ole Virginny Shaker”. It was a 10¢ retailer, $2.70 per box -of 100. (It is of interest that this pipe, listed elsewhere in this same -price list, but as “Ole Virginny Shaker of Virginia red clay, a heavier -stone pipe”, was priced as a 15¢ retailer and $3.00 per box). (Plate 10 -). - -Jobbers discounts were offered. “10 to 20 boxes, 20%”, and going up by -5% stages to “101 to 500 boxes, 35% discount”. “We make many other -styles of Indian Clay and Stone Pipes, ... we can make any style of pipe -that can be made of clay. Our own designers and artists are at your -service” (Plate 11). - -In the last years of Factory operation their sales carried an -identification tag, “This Is An ‘Original’ Powhatan Pipe”, and it was -being made by the last two women of the Pamplin area who were still -making pipes at their homes (Plate 12). - - - PAMPLIN AREA PIPE FORMS - -The pipes are illustrated natural size. The largest and the smallest -pipe of each form available to us are shown. In many instances this -difference in size is not great; however, it does illustrate that minor -variations often existed in different molds for the same pipe form. The -diameters for the stem openings have not been included since they have -proved useful only in consideration of the earlier integral-stem clays, -and not for consideration of the “short-base” pipes of the type and time -included in this report (Wilson, 1971:2). - - TABLE NO. 1. - Sources of Pipes, and Relative Numbers Available for Examination. - - Total number of pipes inspected—4,451. - - Plate. Source. Number of Examples. - - 13 A. Both Many - 13 B. Home 2 - 13 C. Home 11 - 14 D. Home 4 - 14 E. Home Many - 14 F. Both Many - 15 G. Factory Many - 15 H. Home 3 - 15 I. Factory Many - 16 J. Factory Many - 16 K. Both Many - 16 L. Factory Many - 17 M. Both 37 - 17 N. Factory 1 - 17 O. Factory 1 - 17 P. Both Many - 18 Q. Both Many - 18 R. Home 10 - 18 S. Both Many - 19 T. Home 14 - 19 U. Home 2 - 19 V. Factory 1 - 19 W. Surface 1 - 20 X. Factory 1 - 20 Y. Both 2 - 20 Z. Factory 4 - 20 AA. Factory 4 - 21 AB. Factory 1 - 21 AC. Home 1 - 21 AD. Factory 1 - 21 AE. Factory 1 - 22 AF. Factory 2 - 22 AG. Factory 1 - 22 AH. Factory 1 - 22 AI. Factory 2 - 23 AJ. Factory 1 - 23 AK. Factory 1 - 23 AL. Surface 1 - 23 AM. Home 2 - - TABLE NO. 2 - Identifications Appearing On Certain Pamplin Pipes. - Plate: Source of Pipe. Designation. Lettering. - - 13 A. Both Original Impressed - 13 B. Home Original Impressed - 17 M. Both Original or Florence Impressed - 18 Q. Both Hayiti Impressed - 18 R. Home Genuine Impressed - 19 V. Factory 117 Raised - 20 Z. Factory Catlins Raised - 20 AA. Factory 103 Raised - 21 AC. Home Original Impressed - 21 AD. Factory Powhatan Impressed - -_Plate 13 A._ Slightly Acute Angle. Made _both_ in the factory and in -the home. Many examples. All are a deep, dark, glossy red, except 9 -pipes which were a light brown. Plain round bowl, octagonal base. It was -made in at least 12 slightly varying sizes, there being that many -variations between the large and the small pipe illustrated. This was -the Pamplin Company’s “Original” Powhatan, and it was no doubt one of -the Company’s leaders in production and sales. The word “ORIGINAL” is -impressed in the right side of each base, with the exception of one -single pipe, and the lettering appears in at least three different -sizes, there being no correlation between the letter size and pipe size. -This is a sturdily made pipe. - -The Company emphasized in its publicity that the Indians had originally -demonstrated to the early settlers the method of making the Powhatan and -so had enabled them to make this exact form, thereby inferring that this -model should have been of particular interest and worth. No doubt at -some time and place in our history a happening of this nature may have -occurred. However, the Powhatan is a usual form which has been found in -aboriginal sites, with some modifications and of varying materials, over -a wide area. - -Many of these pipes appeared, both from the factory site and among those -made by local women and retrieved from the basement of the Thornton -General Store. Mrs. Betty Price said that this form was a standard -product of the local Home Industry pipe makers before the factory ever -came to Pamplin and one of the earliest made in the area. All of the -pipes available to us carried the designation “Original” except one. - -The making of clay pipes was an old and well established business at -Pamplin; whether the impressing of the word ORIGINAL on the base of this -pipe was an innovation of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing -Company, or whether this had been long done by the Home Industry is -unknown. - -_Plate 13 B._ Slightly Acute Angle. Home. 2 examples. Dark red. Plain -round bowl, octagonal base. Quite similar to “A” except both bowl and -base are shorter, and diameter of bowl proportionally larger. “ORIGINAL” -is impressed on right side of base. A very sturdy pipe. - -_Plate 13 C._ Slightly Acute Angle. Home. 11 examples. Glossy dark red. -Round bowl, octagonal base. Upper part of bowl plain, lower front -portion decorated with a series of raised dots. The dotted area is -divided into two triangles, as well as separated from the undecorated -area by raised and rounded bands. The mold marks in the undecorated area -have been almost entirely smoothed. It would seem that all pipes of this -form came from the same mold, in contrast to the fact that at least most -other Pamplin pipe forms seem to have come from a number of different -molds. - -The two pipe forms “C” and “B” are quite similar, except that “C” has -decoration as well as a slightly longer base, and is not marked -“Original” Both are sturdily built, with thicker than average bowl -walls, and both were retrieved from the Thornton Store site; no examples -were found at the factory site. They are probably the product of the -same individual woman working at her home. - -_Plate 14 D._ Slightly Acute Angle. Home. 4 examples. This is a black -pipe. The deep, solid color was probably intentionally achieved by -allowing portions of the burning wood of the kiln to fall into the iron -kettles which were used as saggers for the firing of pipes in the Home -Industry. The bowl and base are round, with diagonal cross-hatched -decoration on bowl, separated from the same decoration on remainder of -base by a narrow rounded band. Flat band at both top of bowl and end of -base. The right and left halves of the pipe are separated from each -other, front and back, by a broad smooth ridge covering the mold mark. - -_Plate 14 E._ Slightly Acute Angle. Home. Many examples. Bright red. -Bowl and base decoration similar to “D”, but this form is somewhat -smaller than “D”. Double band at both top of bowl and end of base, the -outside band broad and flat, inside band narrow and rounded. Only slight -variations in size. - -_Plate 14 F._ Right Angle. Both. Many examples. Dull red. The Company -called this their “Akron Hamburg”. The diagonally cross-hatched bowl -decoration is separated from the diagonal line base decoration by a -rounded band. Double band at both top of bowl and end of base, the -outside band broad and flat, the inside band narrow and rounded. The -right and left halves of the pipe are divided from each other, front and -back, by a broad smooth ridge covering the mold mark. Only slight -variations in size. - -_Plate 15 G._ Right Angle. Factory. Many examples. Dull red. Diagonal -line decoration on bowl runs at right angles to that on base. Double -band at top of bowl and stem end of base, outside band flat, inside band -narrower and rounded. The right and left halves of the pipe are divided -from each other, front and back, by a broad smooth ridge which covers -the mold mark. Two slightly different sizes. - -_Plate 15 H._ Acute Angle. Home. 3 examples. Dull, dark red. Spiral -decoration on bowl, plain hexagonal base. Double band at top of bowl, -upper flat, lower rounded. Large rounded band at end of base. - -_Plate 15 I._ Right Angle. Factory. Many examples. Dull, dark red; a few -are light brown. The Company called this model their “Ole Virginny -Shaker”. Grooves of decoration run vertically on bowl and curve toward -the bottom to stop at a rounded band, then continue horizontally to stem -end of base. Double band at top of bowl, upper flat, lower rounded. -Double band at stem end of base, inside band rounded; the outside band -may be either rounded or flat; if flat, the end of base is noticeably -swelled. Five slightly varying sizes. - -_Plate 16 J._ Sharply acute Angle. Factory. Many examples. Dark red. -Broad grooves of decoration run from top of bowl and curve toward bottom -to continue to stem end of base, or curve back around bowl. Double band -at top of bowl, upper flat, lower rounded. Prominent rounded swell at -stem end of base. At least 4 different sizes. - -_Plate 16 K._ Acute Angle. Both. Many examples. Dull red to dark brown. -Quite similar to “J” in form and decoration except that lines of -decoration are more narrow and the bowl does not set at such an acute -angle to base. Only slight variations in size. - -_Plate 16 L._ Obtuse Angle. Factory. Many examples. Dark red to brown. -Round undecorated bowl and round tapering base. These pipes are somewhat -similar to early stemmed clay imports except that the base is cut off -rather short, to form a flat vertical face, instead of terminating in a -stem which was an integral part of the bowl and base. The opening in the -end of the base is quite small and does not have the usual taper. All of -the pipes of this form are nearly identical in size. - -_Plate 17 M._ Acute Angle. Both Home and Factory products, 37 examples. -Bright, light red. Plain round bowl, hexagonal base expanding to a -bell-shaped swell at stem end of base. The flat bottom extends around -and under the bowl. “ORIGINAL” is impressed in the right side of base of -some examples and “FLORENCE” in others, while some have no wording. The -factory examples that we saw were marked either “ORIGINAL” or -“FLORENCE”, as were some of those of home manufacture; however, 16 pipes -of home manufacture had no wording. At least three sizes are -represented. - -_Plate 17 N._ Acute Angle. Factory. One Example. Dull, dark red. Similar -to “M” except heavy rounded band of beading around near top of bowl, no -wording. Hexagonal base expands to a bell-shaped swell at stem end. Mold -marks are more distinct. - -_Plate 17 O._ Acute Angle. Factory. One example. Dull, dark red. Plain -octagonal bowl, with planes continuing along base to large rounded swell -at stem end. From deep in the dam at factory site. - -_Plate 17 P._ Obtuse Angle. Both Home and Factory. Many examples. Dull, -dark red or brown. Octagonal bowl and base. No decoration. Base expands -slightly towards stem end. Relatively small pipe, three slightly varying -sizes. - -_Plate 18 Q._ Obtuse Angle. Both Home and Factory. Many examples. -Glossy, light red to deep red. Plain round bowl and base: the base -terminates in rounded and swelled end. “Hayiti” impressed on right side -of base. At least three sizes of lettering. A few of these pipes are -right angled. A similar pipe, except that it had one small rounded band -of beading near the top of bowl, the Company called theirs “Powow Smooth -Shaker”. - -_Plate 18 R._ Very Acute Angle. Home. 10 examples. Dark, glossy red. -“Genuine” is impressed on the right side of base, except one example -which had no lettering. Plain round bowl and base, terminating in -rounded and swelled base end. All apparently from same mold except one -which was not marked “Genuine”. - -_Plate 18 S._ Acute Angle. Both Home and Factory. Many examples. Glossy, -dark red. Plain hexagonal bowl which expands towards the bottom. Plain, -slim round base tapering towards stem end. These pipes usually carry a -high glossy finish. Two slightly different sizes. - -_Plate 19 T._ Slightly Acute Angle. Home. Fourteen examples. Uniform -light tan color. Undecorated round bowl and base. Bowl tapers uniformly -from top to bottom and base expands uniformly to stem end. Two slightly -varying sizes. No mold marks, but some evidence of smoothing. - -_Plate 19 U._ Right Angle. Home. Two examples. Uniform, light pinkish -tan color. Quite similar to “T” except bowl diameter is slightly larger -and does not have the extreme taper, but rounds towards the base. Two -slightly varying sizes. Probably made of the same clay by the same -person who made “T”. No evidence of mold marks, but some evidence of -smoothing. - -_Plate 19 V._ Acute Angle. Factory. One example. Dull red. Round bowl -and base. Two bands of rounded beading encircle mid-portion of bowl, -base expands towards stem end. “117” in raised figures appears on the -left side of the base near stem end. - -_Plate 19 W._ Right Angle (A Surface find). One example. Dull red. -Except for its angle, this pipe is quite similar to “V” with its two -bands of rounded beading encircling the bowl. - -_Plate 20 X._ Slightly Acute Angle. Factory. One example. Salmon pink -color. Ten-sided bowl and base. A rounded band of beading is near the -top of bowl, the base end is simply cut off flat. - -_Plate 20 Y._ Acute Angle. Both Home and Factory. Two examples. The bowl -is decorated by narrow upright grooves and ridges which extend from the -base up to and lightly across a rounded band which encircles the bowl -near its top. The hexagonal base flares somewhat toward the stem end. -This the Company called “Wigwam Shaker”. - -_Plate 20 Z._ Acute Angle. Factory. Four examples. Color ranges from -pale red to light orange, though two are very dark, probably from having -lain long in the stream bed. The round bowl is encircled by a band of -rounded beading near the top. Below this, on each side of the bowl, -appears “CATLINS”. The base is hexagonal and its planes merge into the -lower portions of the round bowl. The top plane of the base seems to be -divided into two narrower planes which give the base a seven-sided -appearance; this however is probably due to lack of trimming of the mold -mark. The base terminates in a large rounded stem end. This was probably -a specialty pipe, and apparently all the pipes of this form had these -characteristics. - -_Plate 20 AA._ Acute Angle. Factory. Four examples. Color ranges from -pale red to light orange to medium red. The 14 upright panels which -constitute the bowl, with its two encircling rounded bands near the top, -give the effect of a wooden bucket whose staves are held by hoops. The -raised number “103” appears on the flat bottom. In one example a metal -ferrule, apparently of brass, is still in place around the stem end of -base. Other examples of this pipe no longer retain the ferrule; however, -the discolored pattern of the ferrule was present to show that each had -originally had one in place. All pipes of this form seem identical and -evidently came from the same mold. - -_Plate 21 AB._ Right Angle. Factory. One example. Dark Red. Round -undecorated bowl and base. Stem end of base has an inside taper to hold -a small reed stem. - -_Plate 21 AC._ Slight Obtuse Angle. Home. One example. Glossy, dark red. -Similar to “AB” except the angle of bowl and “ORIGINAL” is impressed on -the right side of the longer base. - -_Plate 21 AD._ Obtuse Angle. Factory. One example. The plain bowl and -base have a uniform high glossy red finish. “POWHATAN” is impressed on -the right side of base. The stem end of base has been broken off, and it -is possible that this base terminated in a clay stem which was an -integral part of the pipe. In that event it would have followed the -pattern of some of the old white clay imports. There are no spurs or -projections of any nature at the bottom of the bowl. - -_Plate 21 AE._ Probably Obtuse Angle. Factory. One example. Glossy -medium red. This is a form similar to some early white clay imports. -While the only example available to us was badly broken, it seems to -have its own integral clay stem, and it definitely has one spur below -the bowl. - -_Roll of Fired Clay._ A portion of a roll of fired clay was found in the -fill on the Factory site. It evidently had been prepared for molding, -and some clay had been broken from each end. It could have been a test -firing of the clay, or the piece may have unintentionally gotten into -the kiln. - -_Plate 22 AF._ Right Angle. Factory. Two examples. Colors are light -orange and red. A flat band encircles the top of the bowl, and below -this is a more narrow rounded band, whose lower edge is here and there -lightly cut in line with the grooves below. The vertical grooves of -decoration on the bowl continue, or merge with a lesser number of -horizontal grooves and ridges which run to the stem end of the base. -These grooves, in part at least, extend over the large rounded swell at -stem end of base. These two pipes illustrate the minor differences that -may exist in different molds used in making the same basic pipe form. - -This and the following three pipe forms seem to represent a transition -from the earlier, rather heavy, sturdy and relatively thick side-walled -clay pipes, to a pipe lighter in weight, which is more representative of -the form in use by what might be considered the last generation of -regular clay pipe smokers. - -_Plate 22 AG._ Acute Angle. Factory. One example. Color is gray. This -piece was among the eight pipe sherds, still sufficiently intact to give -an indication of the original pipe form from which they had come, that -were picked up by us on the driveway of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and -Manufacturing Company in July 1969. Some were heavily glazed and of a -different character from the pipes dealt with up to this point, and seem -to have come from pipes resulting from the change in style mentioned -under “AF”. - -This pipe fragment has some characteristics similar to “AF”. The bowl -decoration towards the top is unknown, but vertical lines of decoration -occupy the bowl, and only those on the front of the bowl continue along -the base; those on the sides terminate upon joining the front lines. The -stem end of the base is also somewhat different, being decorated by a -rounded and finally a flat band. This sherd carries a moderately heavy -glaze and it is the first pipe form presented which actually shows -evidence of a salt glaze. - -_Plate 22 AH._ Right Angle. Factory. One example. Color pale yellow to -light brown. Round bowl and base, double rounded band of beading around -top of bowl and stem end of base. Bowl decorated with raised dots in -cross-hatched pattern. Spiral decoration on base. Prominent mold marks, -thin sidewalls. Heavily glazed. - -_Plate 22 AI._ Right Angle. Factory. Two examples. Color ranges from -deep red through light orange to yellow. This lighter pipe with thin -sidewalls has two narrow rounded bands encircling the top of bowl, which -is otherwise plain. A large rounded band is at stem end of base. These -pipes are well glazed. - -_Plate 23 AJ._ Right Angle. Factory. One example. Dark Red. This is a -version of the Company’s novelty “Tomahawk Pipe”, decorated to order for -special occasions. The pipe illustrated was made specifically for sale -at the Chicago World’s Fair and has “Century of Progress, Chicago” in -raised letters on the left side. “1833—(likeness of an Indian)—1933” is -on the right side of bowl. - -_Plate 23 AK._ Right Angle. Factory. One example. Color light tan. This -was the Company’s standard novelty pipe, recommended for all occasions, -and it was shaped like a tomahawk. A likeness of Washington appears on -the right side of the bowl, with the name “Washington” in raised letters -above. On the left side is the likeness of an Indian wearing a Plains -headdress, and above it in raised letters is the name “Powhatan”. A wide -flat band encircles the stem end of base. - -The Pamplin Company’s literature stated, _Tomahawk Pipe-Novelty, molded -from hand engraved brass die, of finest clay, hard-burned and glazed. An -attractive item for carnivals, conventions, fairs, etc. Packed 200 to a -box with 5″ reed stems. Price $13.50 per box._ This pipe was a regular -sales item for festive occasions (Plate 11). - -_Plate 23 AL._ Right Angle. (A surface find). One example. Deep red. -Most Pamplin pipes of home manufacture were made by women; however, Miss -Wilsie Thornton and Dr. C. G. O’Brien said that a Mr. Rodgers, about -1938, made pipe molds and pipes of unusual form as a hobby. Miss -Thornton mentioned two forms that he made—an Indian Head, and a Woman’s -Leg, the calf being the bowl and the foot being the base, with the toes -at the stem end of base. This pipe is credited locally as being of his -manufacture. - -_Plate 23 AM._ Right Angle. Home. Two examples. Deep glossy red. The -decoration on the lower portion of the round and expanding bowl reminds -one somewhat of a peach seed; this decoration is separated from the -upper part of the plain upper bowl by a rounded band. The base is -undecorated, and terminates in a smooth enlarged stem end. The second -pipe of this form was a surface find. - -If the Factory had Nos. 103 and 117 how many more numbers may they have -had? - -Impressed identifications, usually put on the base of the pipe with a -stamp after the pipe came from the mold, appear on pipes from both the -Homes and from the Factory. It is of interest that apparently -identifications in raised lettering came only from the Factory. - - - CONCLUSIONS - -In the beginning of this effort we had assumed that the pipes made by -the Factory would be quite different, in both form and decoration, from -those made in the homes. We have found that this assumption is not -valid. - -There is a great deal of overlapping, probably due to the Factory, after -its arrival in Pamplin, taking over and producing a number of the shapes -and designs that had long been in use in the Home Industry. It is also -possible that the Home Industry appropriated some of the Factory pipe -forms. - -In addition, all local evidence agrees that the Thornton Store did not -purchase pipes from the Factory; they were getting plenty themselves, -taken in trade for their merchandise, and which they would have to -dispose of on the wholesale market in competition with the Factory. - -There is local evidence that the Factory did, at times, buy locally made -pipes in order to fill large orders, as well as when their machinery was -not in operation. It is quite unlikely however, after buying and paying -for them, that these pipes would be found in the landfill on the Factory -grounds, the fill from which the “factory” pipes considered in this -study came. - -Of the total of 39 pipe forms located by us, 10 were from Home Industry, -19 from the Factory, (eight appeared in both), and two were either -surface finds or the knowledge of their exact place of manufacture lost, -as they had long been in the hands of their local Pamplin area owners. - -The Akron Company had made pipes before they established the pipe plant -at Pamplin, and the names of some of their pipes in the Pamplin -literature would infer that at least one form, the “Akron Hamburg”, had -been carried from Akron to Pamplin, which then is described as “from -Virginia clay, attractive red color”. - -On the other hand, Mrs. Betty Price has been quoted as saying that the -pipe form known as “Hamburg” was one of the first made by the women of -the area. - -For a time in later years, at least by 1941, the Pamplin Factory made a -pipe similar in form and decoration to their “Akron Hamburg”, but of -fire clay, and called it “Akron Shaker”. - -Since there is so much overlapping of form and decoration between the -pipes made in the homes and those made by the Company, one wonders if -there might not have been even more overlapping had the sample available -to us at this late date been greater than the 4,451 pipes examined. - -It is our conclusion that when the Akron Company came to Pamplin they -started to produce pipes of a number of forms that had long been made by -the Home Industry of the Pamplin area. They may also have brought one or -more Akron pipe forms and decorations with them, to be manufactured at -Pamplin. In turn the Pamplin Home Industry possibly adopted some forms -now being produced by the Company. (Some of these forms may also have -been in production in other areas, but probably of different clay). - -The foremost factor distinguishing Pamplin area pipes, from either -manufacturing source, was the “Virginia clay, of attractive red color”. - -So far as we have been able to determine, no particular friction ever -developed between the Factory and the industry being carried on at the -homes; each had its own wholesale outlets. - -To the best of our knowledge, the Home Industry started about 1740 and -definitely closed in 1953. - -The Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company was established about -1878, and it definitely closed in 1951. - -In our work we have handled literally hundreds of the pipes, Plate 13 A, -called “Powhatan Original” in the Company’s literature and advertising. -These had been excavated both from the factory grounds and from the -basement of the old Thornton Store, and we found nothing about these two -lots of pipes that would seem to distinguish the two manufacturing -sources. Of the total, only one single pipe failed to carry the word -“Original” impressed in the base. - -This “Original” was an early Home Industry form, and there is strong -evidence that when the Company came to Pamplin they adopted this form, -and added “Powhatan” in their advertising, just as they must have -adopted some other local pipe forms. “Original” was also impressed, but -probably at a still later date, on the base of three other pipe forms; -they were forms “B”, “M”, and “AC”. - -We also believe that the Company made the best estimate as to the -starting date of the home pipemaking industry, (they would have had -about a hundred year advantage in arriving at such a date, as compared -to the problem under present circumstances), and applied that date to -Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company as having been -“established 1739”. In other words, they pictured themselves as being a -continuation of the industry that was already there. - -If the date of 1878, or one near that time, for the establishment of the -Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Co. is correct, then this is -later than the terminal date of some of the western forts and trading -posts at which Pamplin pipes have been reported. It would therefore seem -evident that the Pamplin pipes found in some western locations were the -result of Home Industry, made before the pipe plant ever got to Pamplin. -This is authenticated by the fact that they were being carried by the -_Bertrand_. - -It would seem desirable, instead of considering these pipes as Pamplin -Company products, to simply think of them as Pamplin Area Pipes. - - - BIBLIOGRAPHY - - BLAIR, C. DEAN - 1965 _The Potters and Potteries of Summit County, 1828-1915_ The - Summit County Historical Society, Akron, Ohio. - BRADSHAW, HERBERT C. - 1955 _History of Prince Edward County, Virginia_ Dietz Press, - Inc. Richmond. - COTTER, JOHN L. - 1958 _Archaeological Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia_ - Archaeological Research Series No. 4, National Park Service, - Washington. - COTTER, JOHN L. AND J. PAUL HUDSON - 1957 _New Discoveries at Jamestown_ National Park Service, - Washington. - CRESTHULL, PAUL - 1969 “Styles of Detachable Stem Pipes” _Maryland Archaeology_ - V:2. - EWERS, JOHN C. - 1969 Personal Communication January 27, 1969. - 1972 Personal Communication January 19, 1972. - FEATHERSTONE, NATHANIEL R. - 1948 _The History of Appomattox County, Virginia._ Appomattox - American Legion Post 104, Appomattox. - FONTANA, BERNARD L., AND J. CAMERON GREENLEAF - 1962 _Johnny Ward’s Ranch_ The Kiva, 28:1-2, Tucson. - HEITE, EDWARD F. - 1969 “Pipe Industry History Reflected in Tools” _Quarterly - Bulletin_, Archaeological Society of Virginia 24:2, 118-119. - 1971 “Pipes from the Pamplin Factory in Appomattox County - Virginia” _Quarterly Bulletin_, Archaeological Society of - Virginia 25:3, 195-196. - MARTIN, JOSEPH - 1835 _Gazetteer of Virginia_ published by Joseph Martin, - Charlottesville. - MILLER, CARL F. - 1960 “Excavation And Investigations of Fort Lookout Trading Post - II in the Fort Randall Reservoir, South Dakota” _River Basin - Surveys Papers No. 17_, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin - No. 176, Nos. 15-20 pp. 49-82. - OMWAKE, H. GEIGER - 1967 “Supplemental Report on Additional White Clay Pipe Evidence - Recovered from the Buck Site Near Chestertown, Maryland” - _Bulletin Archaeological Society of Delaware_ Nos. 5 and 6, - New Series, Fall 1967: 23-30. - PRUCHA, FRANCIS PAUL - 1964 _Guide to the Military Posts of the U.S._ State Historical - Society of Wisconsin. 1964. - SACKET, RICHARD - 1943 “Historical Clay Pipes of the Minnesota Area”. _Minnesota - Archaeologist_ 9:3, 69-82. Minneapolis. - SMITH, G. HUBERT - 1960a. “Fort Pierre II, an Historic Trading Post in the Oahe Dam - Area, South Dakota”. _River Basin Surveys Papers No. 18_ - Bureau American Ethnology, Bulletin 176, Nos. 15-20: 83-158. - 1960b. “Investigations at Fort Stevenson” _River Basin Surveys - Papers No. 19_, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 176, - Nos. 15-20: 159-238. - THOMPSON, ERWIN T. - 1965 Communication to John W. Walker, Jan. 8, 1965. - THOMPSON, WILLIAM A., JR. - 1969 “Pamplin Pipes” _The Chesopiean_ 7:1. - WALKER, JOHN W. - 1962 Field Notes, on Pamplin Pipes, while engaged in - Archaeological Research Appomattox Courthouse. - WILSON, REX L. - 1961 “Clay Pipes from Fort Laramie” _Annals of Wyoming_, 33:2, - 120-134 Cheyenne. - 1966 “Tobacco Pipes from Fort Union, New Mexico” _El Palacio_, - 73: 1, 32-40. Santa Fe. - 1971 _Clay Tobacco Pipes from Fort Laramie, National Historic - Site and Related Locations._ Division of Archaeology and - Anthropology, National Park Service, Washington. - WOODLING, R. H. - 1969 Communication to Charles H. Meadows, Appomattox National - Historic Park, May 15, 1969 - WOOLWORTH, ALLAN R. AND W. RAYMOND WOOD - 1960 “Archaeology at Kipp’s Post” _River Basin Surveys Papers No. - 20_, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 176: 239-321. - Washington. - - - Newspapers - - 1935 _Farmville Herald_, Farmville, Va. Mar. 29, 1935 “Pamplin - Pipe Factory” - 1946 _Times-Dispatch_, Richmond, Va. April 21, 1946 “Indian Pipes - are Still Produced from Clay Found in Virginia”. - 1965 _Times-Dispatch_, Richmond, Va. March 31, 1965 “Pamplin Pipes - in Smithsonian”. - ? _Times-Dispatch_, Richmond, Va. March 30 ? “Historic Pipes - Shipped West From Virginia”. - 1962 _Times-Virginian_, Appomattox, Va. “Ramblings About Clay - Pipes” Oct. 18, ’62 - - [Illustration: Plate 1. Tools of the Home Pipemaking Industry. - Drawing, Edward F. Heite, Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission.] - - PIPEMAKER’S TOOLS FROM APPOMATTOX COUNTY, VIRGINIA - COMPOSITE DRAWING DERIVED FROM SPECIMENS OWNED BY DR. C. G. O’BRIEN - VIRGINIA HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION ARCHÆOLOGY OFFICE - 1 MOLD CLOSED - TOP VIEW - 2 MOLD CLOSED - EDGE VIEW - 3 MOLD OPEN, TO SHOW WORKINGS - 4 KNIFE - 5 STEM TOOL - 6 BOWL TOOL - - [Illustration: Plate 2. Pamplin Pipe, from the Bertrand, sunk in the - Missouri River, April 1, 1865. Photos, Ronald R. Switzer, Bertrand - Conservation Laboratory, National Park Service.] - - [Illustration: Plate 3. Stencils on Box of Pamplin Pipes retrieved - from the Bertrand. The box top carried the name and address of the - Consignee. One end evidently identified the shipment. The Consignor - was identified on one end and on both sides of the box. Copies, - Ronald R. Switzer, Bertrand Conservation Laboratory, National Park - Service.] - - [Illustration: Plate 4. The Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing - Company, Inc., March 1965. Photo, Richmond Times-Dispatch.] - - [Illustration: Plate 5. Kiln of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and - Manufacturing Company, Inc., March 1965. The kiln had a capacity of - 200,000 pipes at a single burning. Photo, Richmond Times-Dispatch.] - - [Illustration: Plate 6. Pipe Molding Machine from the Pamplin - Factory. Photos, Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission.] - - [Illustration: The machine.] - - [Illustration: Detail of mold.] - - [Illustration: Plate 7. Saggers Used by the Pamplin Factory. - Dimensions of the larger sagger,—overall height 6″, overall width, - 10¼ to 10½″, wall thickness ⅞ to 1″. Dark Brown glaze, mottled. - Photos and description, Edward A Chappell, Virginia Historic - Landmarks Commission.] - - [Illustration: Plate 8. Brochure, Pamplin Smoking Pipe and - Manufacturing Co., Inc., 1941. Copy, Morton L. Wallerstein.] - - - - -This is the largest plant in the world devoted exclusively to the -manufacture of Indian stone clay pipes. Our plant has a capacity of -25,000 pipes per day; our kiln has a capacity of 200,000 pipes at a -single burning. - -From careful search of the records, this factory started more than 200 -years ago. The present plant has been in operation for 44 years. Skilled -American labor is used in a modern, day-lit plant with special attention -to cleanliness, sanitation and ideal conditions. - -The buying trend is toward Indian clay and stone pipes. Tourists and -visitors to your locality are buying them as gifts, souvenirs and for -personal use. Every true American wants a genuine Indian pipe—and can -buy one, for little more than the cost of a can of smoking tobacco. - -Order your assortment today. Display them well and they will sell -quickly. Pamplin Indian Pipes give you a profit unheard of in the -tobacco trade. - - PAMPLIN SMOKING PIPE AND MANUFACTURING CO., Inc. - Established 1739 - Manufacturers of All Styles of - Stone and Powhatan Clay Pipes and Reed Stems - PAMPLIN, VIRGINIA, U. S. A. - -Printed in U. S. A. - - - - - Hand-Made “Powhatan” - - _Powhatan_ - INDIAN CLAY PIPES - - MILD - _mellow_ - SWEET - PURE - _50¢_ WITH _Two_ STEMS - - _Be A Modern Indian Chief! - Smoke the Genuine - “Powhatan” pipe_ - MADE IN VIRGINIA BY NATIVES OF VIRGINIA - -This handsome display card, in five colors, given with each order for -five dozen “Powhatan” Hand-Made Pipes, makes selling easy. Order yours. - - [Illustration: Plate 9. The “Original” Powhatan and other Pamplin - Pipe forms. Brochure, 1941. Copy, Morton L. Wallenstein.] - - The POWHATAN, the original Indian hand-made Pipe, sells on sight, - pays Big Profit! - - - - - “POWOW” SMOOTH SHAKER - “WIGWAM” SHAKER - ORIGINAL “POWHATAN” HAND-MADE - “AKRON” SHAKER - “OLE VIRGINNY” SHAKER - -THESE ARE THE MOST POPULAR STYLES OF PAMPLIN INDIAN PIPES All (except -“Powhatan”) are available in both Shaker (Stone) and Hamburg (Clay). - - - The Original Powhatan Pipe - -The original Powhatan Indian hand-made Pipe has the distinction of being -the exact reproduction of the real pipe made and smoked by the Red Men -in pre-colonial days. - -Pipe smoking was introduced into England by Sir Walter Raleigh who had -seen the Indians smoking. With the start of tobacco cultivation in -Virginia, the Powhatan Pipe became generally used in England and in all -of the American colonies. - -A host of that day took great pride in offering his guests tobacco grown -on his own plantation, in a Powhatan Indian hand-made Pipe. - - An Authentic American Treasure - -The natives who have been making Powhatan Pipes for centuries are -rapidly disappearing. Their children seem unwilling to do the necessary -primitive and tedious work. Manual clay pipe-making, probably America’s -oldest industry, will soon be only a tradition. - -Today the Powhatan Pipe is more than a source of peaceful, contented -smoking enjoyment. It is a collector’s prize, an authentic American -treasure. In a few years it will be generally unobtainable. - -This company is the world’s sole producer of genuine Indian pipes. Since -1739 it has preserved this historic industry. Its clay deposit in -Appomattox County, Virginia, holds the only clay discovered as ideal for -Indian pipes. The trade-mark and name, “Original Powhatan Indian Pipe,” -is its exclusive property. - -Yet the famous Powhatan Pipe is very low in price, as for many years -past, giving the consumer a splendid value, and the jobber and retailer -a profit unheard of in the tobacco trade. - - [Illustration: Plate 10. Price list of Pamplin Company Pipe Forms. - Brochure, November 15, 1941. Copy, Morton L. Wallenstein.] - - - - - PRICE LIST - (EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 15, 1941) - [_See Page 6 for Jobber’s Discounts_] - - - POWHATAN HAND-MADE PIPES - -Individually packaged in attractive rustic container, Historical -Booklet, instruction tag, and two 10″ reed stems—one curved, one -straight, ready for mailing. - - Gross $48.00 - Minimum order ¼ Gross - _Retails for from 50¢ to $1.00_ - - Buy Pipes Made in America—For American Smokers! - - POWHATAN COUNTER DISPLAY - -Twelve Powhatan Pipes, each with Historical Booklet, instruction tag, -and extra 10″ straight stem included. - - DOZEN TO DISPLAY CARD - Gross $48.00 - Minimum order ¼ Gross. - - (_Display card illustrated on Page 3 of this Catalog._) - - Page 10 - - - Powhatan Machine-Made - -Machine-made Powhatan, fitted with cork closures and 10″ reed stems, -bowls trade-marked. Packed 50 to the box with stems. 25¢ Retailer. -Price, $4.00 per box. - - Akron Shaker - -Machine moulded from fire clay, hard-burned and glazed; a stone pipe -fitted with 5″ reed stem. Packed 100 to a box with stems. 15¢ Retailer. -Price, $3.00 per box. - - Powow Shaker - -Stone pipe, smooth finish, glazed, fitted with 5″ reed stem. Packed 100 -to a box with stems. 15¢ Retailer. Price, $3.00 per box. - - Ole Virginny Shaker - -Heavier stone pipe, attractive finish, fitted with 5″ reed stem. Packed -100 to box with stems. 15¢ Retailer. Price, $3.00 per box. - - Wigwam Shaker. - -Real character distinguishes this attractive stone pipe, fitted with 5″ -reed stem. Packed 100 to box with stems. 15¢ Retailer. Price, $3.00 per -box. - - Shaker Assortment. - -An assortment of 25 each of the four above described stone pipes, 100 -pipes, fitted with 5″ reed stem. Packed 100 to box. 15¢ Retailer. Price, -$3.50 per box. - - -Stems can be furnished straight or bent. Additional Stems and Stems -Extra Length Can Be Supplied at Slight Extra Cost. - - _Send Money Order or Check with Order to Save Time._ - - - Terms: 20% Cash With Order. Net 30 Days. - - Page 11 - - - Akron Hamburg - (_Similar to Akron Shaker_) - -Machine-made from Virginia Clay, hard-burned, attractive red color. Also -made in white. Packed 100 to box with 5″ reed stems. 10¢ Retailer. -Price, $2.50 per box. - - Powow Hamburg - (_Similar to Powow Shaker_) - -Machine-made from Virginia Clay, hard-burned, an attractive small bowl. -Packed 100 to box with 5″ reed stems. 10¢ Retailer. Price, $2.50 per -box. - - Ole Virginny Hamburg - (_Similar to Ole Virginny Shaker_) - -Machine-made from finest fire-clay, hard-burned, white, simulates -meerschaum, one of the most popular shapes. Also made in red. Packed 100 -to box with 5″ reed stems. 10¢ Retailer. Price, $2.70 per box. - - Wigwam Hamburg - (_Similar to Wigwam Shaker_) - -Machine-made from Virginia Clay, hard-burned. Choice of red or white. -Shape appeals to young and old. Packed 100 to box with 5″ reed stems. -10¢ Retailer. Price, $2.70 per box. - - Hamburg Assortment - -An assortment of 25 each of the four above described clay pipes, 100 -pipes, fitted with 5″ reed stems. Packed 100 to box with stems. 15¢ -Retailer. Price, $2.85 per box. - - -Stems can be furnished straight or bent. Additional Stems and Stems -Extra Length Can Be Supplied at Slight Extra Cost. - - _Send Money Order or Check with Order to Save Time._ - - Terms: 20% Cash With Order. Net 30 Days. - - Page 12 - - [Illustration: Plate 11. “Tomahawk Pipe”—A Real Novelty, and - Jobber’s Discounts. Brochure, 1941. Copy, Morton L. Wallerstein.] - - - - - The Tomahawk Pipe—A Real Novelty - -Moulded from hand-engraved brass die, of finest quality fire clay, -hard-burned and glazed. An attractive item for carnivals, conventions, -fairs, club meetings, etc. Packed 200 to box, with 5″ reed stems. Price, -$13.50 per box. - - - To the Trade - - JOBBER’S DISCOUNTS - - Apply ONLY When Whole Order Is Shipped At - SAME Time - 10 to 20 Boxes 20% - 21 to 40 Boxes 25% - 41 to 100 Boxes 30% - 101 to 500 Boxes 35% - -In addition to the 10 styles of Indian Pipes illustrated and quoted in -this folder, we make many other styles of Indian Clay and Stone Pipes. -Orders for additional designs—for Advertising, Souvenirs, Gifts, -Tourists, Fairs, Exhibitions, and Special Purposes—are solicited. We can -make any style of pipe that can be made from either Virginia Red Clay or -Fire Clay. Our own designers and artists are at your service. _We invite -your inquiries._ Samples will be mailed promptly to rated firms. - -(Note: If you have a friend to whom you would like for us to send one of -these folders, please write. It will be sent promptly.) - - [Illustration: Plate 12. Sales Tag, carried by the “Original” - Powhatan Pipe, 1941. Copy, Morton L. Wallerstein.] - - - - - _This Is An - “Original” - Powhatan Pipe_ - - -Made entirely by hand in a primitive way, from hand-carved moulds -several centuries old, by natives in Appomattox County, Va. Succeeding -generations, dating back to the earliest days of America, have practiced -the ancient art of making these Indian pipes by hand. The slow, tedious -work, requiring innate skill, is not attractive to the moderns. This art -is rapidly disappearing. Soon the genuine Powhatan Pipe will be -generally unobtainable. This Pipe, therefore, will become a rare and -cherished antique and keepsake. - -This Powhatan Pipe is an original, made exactly like those the Indians -used prior to the coming of the white man to America, and as smoked in -the early colonies and in England following Sir Walter Raleigh’s -introduction of tobacco into that country. The clay is porous and the -old Virginia reed stem also absorbs the nicotine. To clean the pipe -according to the old Virginia method, remove the stem and place the bowl -into the fire-place. This will burn out the absorbed nicotine without in -any way harming the pipe. New stems may be obtained from your -tobacconist. - - PAMPLIN INDIAN PIPE CO., - Pamplin, Va., U. S. A. - - [Illustration: Plate 13. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - [Illustration: Plate 14. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - [Illustration: Plate 15. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - [Illustration: Plate 16. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - [Illustration: Plate 17. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - [Illustration: Plate 18. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - [Illustration: Plate 19. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - [Illustration: Plate 20. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - [Illustration: Plate 21. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - [Illustration: Plate 22. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - [Illustration: Plate 23. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.] - - - - - THE UTLAUT SITE (23SA162W): AN ONEOTA-HISTORIC MISSOURI BURIAL SITE - - - by - Patricia J. O’Brien and Kevin Hart - -The Utlaut site (23SA162W) is located on the floodplain of the Missouri -River about one mile west of Malta Bend, Saline County, Missouri and -approximately two miles northwest of the junction of Highway 65 and 127. - -The site is situated on land owned by Oscar John of Sweet Springs, -Missouri and was farmed by Ryland Utlaut of Grand Pass. Both kindly -allowed us to excavate there. We were directed to the site by J. M. -“Buster” Crick of Corder, Missouri, a local collector who had been -finding ceramics which looked “Mississippian.” His aid was invaluable, -for without it this work could not have been done. - -Scattered occupational debris was found covering an area ca. 100 feet in -diameter around our test, but the major materials recovered, in six -burials, seem not to be related to the surface debris. Those materials -will be reported in a later paper dealing with site 23SA162, the Cole -Lake Sand Ridge site. - -As mentioned, the Utlaut site is situated on the floodplain of the -river. The area, though, is in reality an old beach of the Missouri, -formed when the river swung south of its present course and came near -Grand Pass. Because the soil was almost pure sand, all of it was -screened. - -The initial test was an east-west trench comprising five alternating -squares (Fig. 2). Burial materials were found between stakes 35W and 55W -north and south of the 0 line (Fig. 2). Remains of five burials were -recovered. While a few bones were treated as a separate burial in the -field (Burial 5), they were found to be related to Burial 2 on -completion of the analysis. The bones in burials 1 through 5 were in -very poor condition, and because of cultivation many are missing. - - - BURIAL DESCRIPTIONS - -The osteological analysis of the skeletal remains found in Appendix I is -by the junior author and Clark Larsen. The descriptions to follow will -focus on the cultural nature of the burials. - -_Burial 1._ This is an adult male. The body was extended and oriented on -a northeast-southwest axis with the head northeast. Although a vessel -was found in the same square as the burial, it is thought that it -belongs to Burial 4. One projectile point was found just east of the -neck. Due north by about one foot was a biface chopper/scraper. These -artifacts may be associated with this burial (Figs. 2 and 3). - - [Illustration: Figure 1. Floodplain of the Missouri River with - locations of 23SA4 Gumbo Point site, 23SA162W Utlaut site, and - 23SA162 Cole Lake Sand Ridge site.] - - [Illustration: Figure 2. Test excavations at the Utlaut site, - 23SA162W, with Detail “A” showing the burials.] - - _BURIAL 6_ - _Pot_ - _BURIAL 2_ - _Child’s skull_ - _Pot_ - _Shell Spoon_ - _BURIAL 3_ - _Scraper_ - _BURIAL 4_ - _Pot_ - _Biface_ - _BURIAL_ - _Projectile point_ - _Bundled bones_ - - [Illustration: Figure 3. Burial 1, 23SA162W. View is toward - northeast.] - -The projectile point is triangular, of tan-cream chert and is 3.1 cm. -long, 1.44 cm. wide and 0.25 cm. thick (Fig. 4a). It is a typical -Mississippian/Oneota point. The biface was cream colored with cortex -present. There is a scraper edge on the long axis on one side (Fig. 4b). -It is 14.0 cm. long, 9.9 cm. wide, and 3.1 cm. thick. - -One of the most interesting aspects of this 35+ year old male burial is -the possible “trophy” skeletal materials placed on the knee area. -Remains of three persons and possibly a fourth were found in a -fragmentary condition, and while some of the long bones were intact, the -cranial remains present were shattered. Two explanations seem most -obvious: (1) the remains are the result of some type of human sacrifice, -or (2) they are secondary burial of remains disturbed from their -original location. These ideas will be more fully explored later in the -paper. - -_Burial 2._ The skeletal material recovered from this burial was very -fragmentary and the actual number of individuals involved could be three -rather than the two suggested in the anatomical analysis. No complete -skeleton was found, rather a series of jumbled long bones with the femur -head facing southwest (Figs. 2 and 5), suggesting an extended burial on -a northeast-southwest axis. At the knee area was found a skull which -showed evidence of burning. This data, even more than that of Burial 1, -suggests “human sacrifice” or some such exotic behavior. Because some of -the long bones were burnt too, it is possible the firing occurred as a -part of the burial ritual. At the northeastern end of the burial was -found a child’s skull; its relationship to the adult is unclear at this -time. - -Also associated with Burial 2 was a ceramic vessel and a fresh water -mollusc spoon (Fig. 6a-b). The spoon was very fragile and crumbled on -cleaning. The vessel was a small globular jar with an everted rim and -two strap handles. On the shoulder of the vessel below the handles were -incised double nestled chevrons, while two single incised lines ran -vertically from neck to base between the handles (Fig. 6a). The handles -had double incised lines on them. The vessel was shell tempered with a -slight scalloping of the lip. It was 7.63 cm. high, the orifice was 6.27 -and 6.07 cm. in diameter, while the shoulder was 9.95 and 9.5 cm. in -diameter. The vessel seems to be a typical Oneota form. - -_Burial 3._ This burial was extended with head to the northeast and body -on a northeast-southwest axis (Fig. 7). It was a child’s, and the only -grave goods associated with it was a chert scraper (Fig. 4c). It was -found south of the pelvic area. It is cream chert, is 3.39 cm. long, -1.78 cm. wide and 0.6 cm. thick. Anterioral and posterioral flattening -of the frontal and occipital region is marked on this individual’s -skull. - -_Burial 4._ The burial when found was highly fragmentary; the legs are -all that remain. No artifacts were found with it. Alignment of the legs -indicates that the head was to the northeast and the body was on a -northeast-southwest axis. However, in the process of analyzing these -data it was discovered that by projecting the former location of the -missing head and torso, this burial seems to be associated with the -isolated pot from square 0-40W. As figures 2 and 8 show, the vessel -would have been placed beside the left shoulder. - - [Illustration: Figure 4. Artifacts recovered from the Utlaut site, - 23SA162W: a. triangular un-notched projectile point, Burial 1; b. - Biface chopper/scraper, Burial 1; c. scraper, Burial 3.] - - [Illustration: Figure 5. Burial 2, 235A162W. View is toward - northeast.] - - [Illustration: Figure 6. Top and side views of vessels recovered at - the Utlaut site, 23SA162W: a-b Burial 2; c-d Burial 4.] - - [Illustration: Figure 7. Burial 3, 23SA162W. View is toward the - south. Burial 4 is to the left.] - -This oval-shaped vessel has 14 rows of punctations running around the -whole surface. There are two strap handles each with two incised lines -placed vertical to the rim (Fig. 6c-d). The rim has been damaged by the -plow. Orifice size is 8.21 cm. at the handles and 7.7 cm. between them. -It is 12.36 by 13.2 cm. at the shoulder and 8.15 cm. high (incomplete). - -Vessels with similar extensive all-over punctation are reported from the -Lower Mississippi River Valley and called Parkin Punctated (Phillips, -Ford and Griffin 1951:Fig. 94). But a vessel with extensive punctation -over the upper two-thirds of it, with some zoned punctates in parallel -lines below the handles, has been reported from Gumbo Point (23SA4), an -historic Missouri site about a mile and a quarter to the northeast -(Chapman 1959:Fig. 36). - -Henning (1970) does not report such a design from the Utz site nor other -nearby Oneota sites. This tempts one to suggest the vessel has stronger -affinities to the historic Missouri than to the Oneota component nearby. - -_Burial 5._ These highly fragmentary remains probably belong with the -child in Burial 2. They were found in the northeast corner of square -5N-50W which is just north of the area of the child’s skull in Burial 2. - -_Burial 6._ This individual was interred in a different pattern from the -others. It was semi-flexed with the head and shoulders slumped forward -and down as if the burial pit was not large enough to hold him (Figs. 2 -and 9). Rodents had run through the chest area and gnawed some of the -bone. - -Grave goods consisted of a whole vessel and glass trade beads. The -vessel, which was at his knee, was a globular jar having two strap -handles with four incised lines running vertically from the rim, and -double nestled chevrons below them. The chevron was filled with -narrow-line, incised punctates (Fig. 10a-b). The rim was damaged. The -vessel is 10.5 by 11.7 cm. at the orifice, 16.3 by 18.0 cm. at the -shoulder and 12.8 cm. high, making it slightly oval in shape. - -Two kinds of beads were found. One was a “seed” bead _ca._ 0.18 cm. in -diameter with a 0.05 cm. hole. There were 202 of these found in the sand -around the head and shoulders. They may have been in the hair. All were -turquoise in color. The second kind included three larger specimens—two -turquoise blue and one black. The blue were 0.66 x 0.84 cm., 0.8 x 0.75 -cm. and 0.82 x 0.63 cm. in diameter and length. The first had a 0.2 cm. -hole and the others 0.18 cm. The black was 0.58 x 0.58 cm. with a 0.12 -cm. hole. These beads were found in the area of the left wrist. - -These materials are historic trade goods, and are not significantly -different from those at Gumbo Point (Chapman 1959) or at the Utz site -(Robert T. Bray, personal communication). Although these materials could -be the result of English or even American trading activities, it is -thought they are French, for the following reasons. - - [Illustration: Figure 8. Burial 4 23SA162W. View is toward the - southwest. The skull of Burial 3 is in the right hand corner.] - - [Illustration: Figure 9. View of Burial 6, 23SA162W. View is toward - the north.] - - [Illustration: Figure 10. Top and side view of vessel recovered with - Burial 6 at the Utlaut site, 23SA162W.] - -It is probable that this individual was a member of the Gumbo Point late -Missouri village which may date 1727-1777 A.D. (Chapman 1959:63). This -village was very near Fort Orleans which dates 1723-1728 A.D. (Bray -1961a:216-219). At the same time, this burial is associated with others -which have no trade goods and apparently are completely prehistoric. -Therefore, one could argue that the body was interred at the time of the -proto-historic-historic boundary for that village. That boundary would -be about 1727 A.D. if Chapman’s (1959:2) assumed dating of the beginning -of the village following the abandonment of the Utz site is correct. - -However, it could be argued that Burial 6 had nothing to do with the -Oneota burials with it, and that the body could date as late as 1777 -A.D. But for that to be so, we would have to assume it was just chance -that of the several old beaches in that field this Indian was placed -right in an earlier burial area. Rather, it seems more reasonable to -have the cemetery area known and indeed the burials marked, so that the -interment could take place without disturbing them. - -Whether the Missouri Indians marked their graves cannot be stated, as no -data on their mortuary practices are known. We do know that the -Winnebago placed a post at the head of a grave (Radin 1923:144), and as -the Missouri and Winnebago are both Chiwere Sioux, it is possible that -this is an old shared trait. If this is so, and if the 1727 A.D. dating -is correct, the trade goods are probably French as they were extremely -active in this area at this early date. - - - DISCUSSION - -Two separate, but related, cultural components are present at the site: -Oneota and historic Missouri. Burials 1 through 4 were originally supine -extended interments, although they have suffered much from plowing, and -their associated artifacts indicate a general Oneota affiliation. Burial -4 with its punctated vessel though is probably late, bordering on the -late proto-historic-historic Missouri line. Burial 6, with its glass -trade beads, is historic, and since the Gumbo Point site (23SA4), a -historic Missouri village dating around 1727-1777 A.D., is only one and -a quarter miles to the northeast of the Utlaut site, the burial is -probably an Indian of that village. - -The following data on Oneota burial practices can be extracted from -these data. Individuals are buried in a supine extended position on a -northeast-southwest axis. In three cases, Burials 1, 3 and 4, the head -is to the northeast; in one, Burial 2, it is southwest. Grave goods of -pots, projectile point, shell spoon or scraper were present but -seemingly not very diagnostic of social position, although the pots may -be associated only with children here (Burials 2 and 4). Also, unless -one assumes everyone was buried at the same time, it seems that the -graves were marked so people could be interred over a period of time -without disturbing early graves, and so they could be aligned with each -other. - -Two adults seem to have “trophy” skeletal materials with them: a skull -on the knees of Burial 2 (burnt) and many fragments of three and -possibly four people on the lower legs of Burial 1. Bray (1961b:17-19) -reports a “trophy head” with an Orr focus Oneota burial at the Flynn -site, and glass trade beads with it point to this being an historic -Ioway trait. Because there is no historic data on Missouri Indian burial -practices, it is not possible now to tell if the trait is associated -with them nor just what it may mean. - -One could explain the skeletal remains, especially those with Burial 1 -as secondary interments of graves which were somehow disturbed. In which -case the term “trophy” would be inappropriate and misleading. This -possibility is found in the fact that the Winnebago had two burial -patterns: inhumation and platform associated with the phratry divisions -of the culture, although the latter practice died out in historic times -(Radin 1923:140). Since the Missouri are related to the Winnebago it is -possible that these materials are inhumed platform burials. - -However, the presence of single skulls with Burial 2, burnt too, and -with an Ioway at the Flynn site cannot be explained that easily. The -skull on the knees of Burial 2 was burnt at the time of interment as the -knee area was also burned. Then too, if one was collecting platform -burial remains to be inhumed, more than just the skulls would be lying -about to be collected. Again if we look at the Winnebago we get some -interesting data. In a discussion of grave-post markings, Radin -(1923:155) points out that a warrior who had killed a man and cut off -his head received a special grave-post signifying the deed. -Unfortunately, he does not tell us if the head was buried with him. - -As can be seen by the above discussion, there are data to support both -interpretations, and indeed, maybe these burials in fact are the result -of both sets of behavior rather than only one set. - -A comparison of the Utlaut site Oneota burials with other Oneota burial -data follows. From the Leary site in Nebraska Wedel reports (1935:25-26) -two types of interments: (1) supine burials with beads to the north (3), -east (3) or south (2). Associated with them are knives, hematite and a -bison hoe as grave goods. (2) Bundled or jumbled bones within a pit and -probably removed from scaffolds. Bass reports (1961) a body without -head, semi-flexed on its back and left side. - -Myers and Bass (n.d.) give the following data on Oneota burial material -from Iowa. At the Hartley site (13AM103) in Allamakee County, Burial 1 -was primary extended with head west and face north. It was a child about -ten years old and with it was a pot and chert knife. Burial 2 was a -female, 20-30 years old, primary extended with head northeast and no -artifacts. Burial 3 was a child, 10-13 years old with a pot. It was a -secondary burial. Burial 4 was a female, 20-30 years of age, primary -extended with head to the east. A bison scapula hoe was with it. Burial -5 was a male, 25-35 years old; it was a primary one with the body in a -semi-sitting position and head on chest. The head faced northwest and -the face was down. No grave goods were present. Burial 7 was a secondary -bundled indeterminate adult. Burial 8 was a female, 18-28 years, primary -extended burial with head to the northwest and no artifacts. Burial 10 -was a nine year old child, primary extended with head to east. A pot was -associated with it (Myers and Bass n.d.:7-11). - -At the Blood Run site (13L02) in Lyon county, five burials were reported -by Myers and Bass (n.d.). Burial 1 was a 3 to 4 year old child. It was -extended in a pit in a mound with head facing northwest. Associated were -copper earrings, two wooden tubes at the ears and a rim sherd at the -right elbow. Burial 2 was a 30-40 year old male, extended supine with -head northwest and no artifacts. Burial 3 was a 35-45 year old male, -extended with head north and face to the east. It may be burnt on the -left side. Associated was a catlinite pipe and a shell bead. Burial 4 -was a male, 21-28 years of age, extended supine with head northeast and -no artifacts. Finally, Burial 5 was a 2-3 year old child, associated -with Burial 2; the grave goods were three blue glass beads (Myers and -Bass n.d.:35-40). - -At Correctionville site the burials are reported as extended supine -(Myers and Bass n.d.:43). At the Flynn site (13AM51) in Allamakee county -ten burials were recovered (Bray 1961b: 15-18). Burial 1 was a fully -extended, supine adult with head to north. Associated were a raven -skull, two bone beads, two shell beads, two copper or brass ornaments, a -bone pendant and a small animal scapula. Burial 2 was a fully extended -supine adult with head north. Associated were a pumice lump, red ochre, -rolled copper or brass tubes, chert flakes and a belt of rolled copper -or brass beads. Burial 3 was a fully extended supine adult with two -triangular projectile points and some small animal bones. Burial 4 was a -fully extended supine adult oriented east-west. No trade goods were -found; only aboriginal bone whistles, a heron beak, a bone tube and a -squirrel skull. Burial 5 was an adult oriented north-south and -accompanied by many offerings: a pot, a fresh water clam shell, 100 -copper/brass beads, 12 copper/brass bracelets, sheet copper, two steel -knives, a steel awl, chert flakes, glass beads and “bead” girdle as in -Burial 1. Burial 6 was a fully extended supine adult with a north-south -orientation, with the head north. Artifact associations were blue and -green glass beads, a beaver incisor, chert flakes, a polished bison rib, -a beaded girdle as with Burials 1 and 5 and a “trophy” human skull at -the left knee area. Burial 7 was different because it was deeper, under -slabs of rock, and in a pit. Present was a child’s skull and two -carnivore jaws. Burials 8 and 9 were incomplete and damaged, but seem to -have been an adult and a 30-month old child. Burial 10 was a fetus or -newborn infant. - -Ten burials are reported (Henning 1970:120-212) from the Utz site -(23SA2), the nearest large Oneota site just a few miles east of the -Utlaut site. Position, sex and age are known only for a few. Burial 3 -was a 27 year old male, fully extended with a mussel shell, sheet copper -and bone tube. Burial 4 consisted of two adults, but only one complete, -fully extended 40 year old female. Burial 5 was a 30 year old male with -a bone awl, a deer phalanx and worked hematite. Burial 7 was a 35 year -old male with knives and abrader. Burial 8 was fully extended, 35 years -old, male, covered with red ochre and was accompanied by several chert -flakes. He may have died of wounds, since a projectile point was found -in the cervical vertebrae. Finally, in the summer of 1970 an adult male -was found in a storage/trash pit at the site (Robert T. Bray, personal -communication). - -Having reviewed the data on Oneota burials in Nebraska, Iowa and -Missouri, the following hypotheses or assertions or guesses are offered -concerning the general character of Oneota mortuary practices. Hopefully -they will be tested in the future when more, especially descriptive, -data become available. - -(1) The bodies typically seem to be supine and fully extended. - -(2) Orientation to a specific cardinal point does not seem to be -involved as they range all around the compass. - -(3) There appears to be some evidence that the graves were marked. - -(4) Although most burials have some grave goods material, some do not. -Except for the “trophy” material and the fact that some of the historic -burials have more artifacts, there do not seem to be marked differences -in the wealth of the burials. Possibly each individual is accompanied by -some personal tool or ornament. At the Flynn, Hartley and Utlaut sites, -burials of children are accompanied by ceramic vessels—at the Blood Run -site, with a rim sherd. If this is a pattern, it changed in historic -times because burials with pots and trade goods are adult (Flynn, B. 5, -and Utlaut, B. 6). - -(5) The lack of rich burials in the proto-historic (Oneota) period and -their presence in the historic suggests a process of social -stratification may be occurring because of new wealth. But this may be -more apparent than real, if the “trophy” material at the Utlaut site was -the proto-historic means of marking status to be replaced in the -historic period by trade goods. If that is so, then it would suggest -some social stratification in Oneota continuing through to the known -historic Missouri chiefs. - - -_Acknowledgments._ The senior author is pleased to acknowledge the -support of Kansas State University’s Bureau of General Research for a -1970 Summer Fellowship. The fellowship made possible this research. The -cooperation of Robert T. Bray, Director, Lyman Archaeological Research -Center, University of Missouri, is gratefully acknowledged for his help -and many kindnesses throughout this work. To him, and my other -colleagues: Alfred E. Johnson and W. Raymond Wood, who all helped to run -the joint Midwestern Archaeological Field School in the summer of 1970 -go my thanks. William M. Bass kindly loaned me the Myers and Bass -manuscript which was most appreciated as it was essential for this -analysis. Finally, thanks are due to the students of the field school -who excavated these materials: Mike Gilman, Tom Green, Kevin Hart, Ann -Hirsh and Donna Roper, for without their good spirits and effort the -work could not have been done. - - - REFERENCES CITED - - ANDERSON, J. E. - 1969 _The Human Skeleton: A Manual for Archaeologists._ National - Museum of Canada, Ottawa. - BASS, WILLIAM M. - 1971 Personal Communication. - BASS, WILLIAM M. - 1961 1960 Excavations at the Leary Site, Richardson County, - Nebraska 25RH1. _Plains Anthropologist_, 6: 31, 201-202. - BRAY, ROBERT T. - 1961a The Missouri Indian Tribe in Archaeology and History. - _Missouri Historical Review_, LV: 3, 213-225. Columbia. - 1961b The Flynn Cemetery: An Orr Focus Oneota Burial Site in - Allamakee County, Iowa. _Journal of the Iowa Archaeological - Society_, 10: 4, 15-25. - BROTHWELL, DON R. - 1963 _Digging Up Bones._ British Museum, London. - HENNING, DALE R. - 1970 Development and Interrelationships of Oneota Culture in the - Lower Missouri River Valley. _The Missouri Archaeologist_, - Vol. 32, Whole Volume. Columbia. - KROGMAN, WILTON M. - 1962 _The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine._ Charles C. - Thomas, Springfield, Illinois. - MCKERN, THOMAS W. AND T. D. STEWART - 1957 _Skeletal Age Changes in Young American Males._ Technical - Report EP-45, Quartermaster Research and Development Center, - U.S. Army, Natick, Massachusetts. - MORSE, DAN - 1969 _Ancient Disease in the Midwest._ Reports of Investigations - No. 15, Illinois State Museum. - MYERS, JUDY A. AND WILLIAM M. BASS - n.d. An Analysis of the Human Skeletal Material from Some Oneota - Sites. Unpublished Manuscript. - TROTTER, MILDRED AND GOLDEN C. GLESER - 1958 A Re-evaluation of Estimation of Stature Based on - Measurements of Stature During Life and of Long Bones After - Death. _American Journal of Physical Anthropology_, 16: 1, - 79-124. Philadelphia. - PHILLIPS, P., J. A. FORD AND J. B. GRIFFIN - 1951 Archaeological Survey in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial - Valley, 1940-1947. _Papers of the Peabody Museum of American - Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University_, Vol. XXV. - Cambridge. - RADIN, PAUL - 1923 _The Winnebago Tribe._ Thirty-seventh Annual Report of the - Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution. - - - - - APPENDIX I - SKELETAL REMAINS FROM THE UTLAUT SITE - - - by - Kevin Hart and Clark Larsen - -The following paper reports the osteological data on the burials from -the Utlaut site. The authors are indebted to Dr. William M. Bass, -formerly of the University of Kansas, now Chairman, Department of -Anthropology, University of Tennessee, for his encouragement and -criticisms on this paper, and especially for his training while Visiting -Professor of Anthropology at Kansas State University in the Spring, -1971. He is, of course, not responsible for any errors on our part. - - _Burial 1_ - Sex: Male - Age: 35⁺ - Stature: 5′8″ ± 1.28″ (173.46 cm ± 3.24 cm) - -Burial One is a middle aged male in good condition, represented by an -almost complete skeleton. Of the major bones, only the left radius, -right ulna and left clavicle are absent, along with the second cervical, -four thoracic and one lumbar vertebra. Except for eight phalanges of the -hand, all of the hand and feet bones are also missing. - -The sex of the individual is based on several factors. First, the width -of the femur head is 46 mm., within the male range according to Krogman -(1962:143-146). The skull is characterized by heavy brow ridges, blunt -upper edges of the eye orbits, and a general overall ruggedness -indicating a male. The pelvis, however, does have a wider than usual -sciatic notch for a male. - -Despite some erosion, the pubic symphyses show a breakdown of the -symphyseal rim and face indicating an age of 38⁺ (McKern and -Stewart:83). Endocranial suture closure is complete, suggesting an -approximate age of at least 40. Thirdly, toothwear on the remaining -molars seem to follow the pattern in Brothwell (1963:69) for the 35-45 -age group. - -The Stature was calculated using the formula 1.22 (Femur and Tibia) + -70.37 ± 3.24 (Trotter and Gleser 1958:120). - -Both the tibiae (Fig. 11) and fibulae show evidence of inflammation of -the Periosteum (Periostitis), similar to cases noted in Morse -(1969:108). In addition, one lumbar vertebra has an anomalous growth on -it, and the chin of the individual protrudes abnormally. The hole in the -skull shown in the burial picture is the result of an accident in the -excavation. - - [Illustration: Figure 11. Tibiae from Burial 1, 23SA162W, showing - evidence of periostitis.] - -Resting on and around the knees of Burial One were a number of whole -bones and bone fragments of at least three other individuals. - - _Sex_ _Age_ _Stature_ - - Male 30⁺ —— - —— 30⁺ —— - —— —— —— - -These bones were laid in a haphazard manner. Most of the larger post -cranial bones are represented by fragments from two separate -individuals, but there are parts of three left femora present and -possibly four. The poor condition of the fourth femur fragment left the -side in doubt. The skull fragments are from at least two different -persons. Mixed in with these human bones are two tibia fragments from a -deer. - -A skull fragment from one individual shows heavy muscle marking on the -occipital region, and a fairly large mastoid process, suggesting a male. -There are insufficient pieces of skull from the other individual or -individuals for any judgment on their sex. The pieces of innominate are -also fragmentary, although it appears that one acetabulum is rather -large, possibly indicating a large femur head. While the long bones from -all the individuals seem large, all the femur and humerus heads are -missing, preventing any measurements for sex. All the long bones are -broken. - -The age determination is based on the presence of completely closed -endocranial sutures on the skull fragments of two persons, suggesting a -mature age. Although suture closure is not a good criterion for age -(McKern and Stewart 1957:37), a more accurate age estimate is not -possible because of the absence of pubic symphyses and teeth. - -Stature could not be determined because of the broken condition of the -long bones. - - -_Burial 2_ - -There are at least two individuals represented in this burial. - - _Sex_ _Age_ _Stature_ - - Male 28-35 5′9.3″ (175.9 cm ± 3.24 cm) - —— 3-6 —— - -The adult bones associated with this burial included the upper portion -of a skull, right and left femur, right and left tibia, two fibula -fragments, a first sacral vertebra, and fragments of both the right and -left innominates. The child is represented by a left parietal. Several -of the skull fragments as well as the right femur and sacral vertebra of -the adult showed evidence of burning. Most of the skeletal material is -fragmentary and in poor condition. - -The age of the adult is based on cranial suture closure. The sutures -endocranially are closing, but ectocranially the sutures are still quite -distinctive and have not yet begun to close. This indicates an age of 28 -to 35 years. However, some authorities feel this is not a good criterion -for aging (McKern and Stewart 1957:37). - -The sex is based on morphological characteristics of the cranial -material. The skull contained large frontal sinuses and heavy muscle -markings, indicative of the male sex (Krogman 1962:112-152). - -Stature was based on the formula for Mongoloids given by Trotter and -Gleser (1958:120) for the femur plus the tibia. Using the left femur -plus the tibia the stature estimation was calculated to be 5′9.3″ with a -range from 5′8″ to 5′10.6″ (175.9 cm ± 3.24 cm). This stature is also -indicative of the male sex. - -Age of the child is determined by the thickness and size of the left -parietal. This indicated an age of probably not younger than three and -not older than six. - - _Burial 3_ - Age: 10-12 - -This child’s burial consisted of the major portion of an articulated -skull, a mandible, a left scapula, right and left tibia, right and left -femur, right and left innominates, two rib fragments, and two lumbar -vertebrae. The condition of this burial is poor with all the bones being -in various stages of fragmentation. - -The age of this individual is based on tooth eruption and wear. The -adult second molars are fully erupted and show no wear. The adult second -premolars are in the process of erupting, indicating an age of 10-12 -(Brothwell 1963:59). - -Skull deformation is quite noticeable. It is flattened both anteriorly -and posteriorly, particularly in the frontal and occipital regions. This -deformation is probably due to pressure applied to the head of the -infant through binding to a flat structure, such as a cradle board (Fig. -12). - -All mandibular teeth are present with no caries or tartar. The adult -second premolars are quite late in erupting. As previously indicated the -skull is mostly articulated, but is in poor condition. Parts of the -frontal and occipital are missing. - - _Burial 4_ - Sex: Indeterminate - Age: Child - Stature: Indeterminate - -Burial four is the remains of one individual: a child, in poor -condition. The remaining bones are fragments from the right femur, tibia -and fibula, and from the left tibia. In addition, there were also -several unidentifiable pieces. The size and condition of the fragments -make any specific judgment as to sex, age, or stature impossible other -than to say the individual was rather young. No anomalies or pathologies -were evident. - - [Illustration: Figure 12. Right and left profiles of the skull from - Burial 3, 23SA162W, showing skull deformation.] - - _Burial 6_ - Age: 19-25 - Sex: Male - Stature: 5′8.6″ ± 1.3″ (174.2 cm ± 3.24 cm) - -Most of the bones of this burial are present with the exception of the -majority of the hand phalanges, carpal and tarsal bones, one lumbar -vertebra, and the coccygeal vertebrae. The condition of the bones is -fair. - -The age of this individual is based on the fact that the basilar suture -has just closed and the sacral vertebrae have not completely fused. The -sutures have not yet begun to close, and all of the epiphyses of the -long boxes have united, suggesting an age range of 19 to 25. - -Sex determination is based on morphological and anthropometric -characteristics of both the post-cranial and cranial skeleton. The -diameter of the femur head is 46 mm, well within the male range (Krogman -1962:143-146). The innominates showed narrow pubic portions and -sub-pubic angles. The skull has distinctive muscle markings, large -mastoid processes, heavy brow ridges, and a square chin, all of which -are characteristically male. - -The stature estimation was calculated from the length of the left femur -and tibia, using Trotter and Gleser’s formula for Mongoloids (Trotter -and Gleser 1958:120). It was calculated to be 5′8.6″ with a range from -5′7.3″ to 5′9.9″ (1.74 cm ± 3.24 cm). As indicated in Table 2, this -individual was hyperbrachycranic or very broad headed. As in Burial 3, -lambdoidal flattening was quite noticeable, probably a result of -pressure of a cradle board. - -Due to the poor condition of the material from the Utlaut site, -anatomical comparisons other than male stature are not possible. Table 3 -gives the stature comparisons of the Iowa-Nebraska Oneota material, and -they suggest that for height of males, the Utlaut population are most -similar to the males at the Leary site in Nebraska. - - Table 1 - Post-cranial Measurements (in millimeters) and Indices for - Skeletal Material from The Utlaut Site, 23SA162W - Burial 1 Burial 2 Burial 6 - R L R L R L - Femur - - Maximum morphological length 451 455 — 485 — 454 - A-P diameter midshaft 31 31.5 — — — 27.5 - Transverse diameter midshaft 26 27.5 — — — 24 - Maximum diameter of head — 46 — — — 46 - - Tibia - - Maximum morphological length — 390 — 380 (392)[1] 397 - A-P diameter nutrient foramen — 40 — — 36 35 - Transverse diameter nutrient — 23 — — 26 25 - foramen - Bicondylar breadth — 79 — — — — - - Post Cranial Indices - - Pilastric Index 119.24 114.28 — — — 116.67 - Cnemic Index — 56.00 — — 72.22 71.42 - Crural Index — 85.49 — — — 87.45 - - Table 2 - Cranial Measurements (in millimeters) and Indices - Burial 2 - - Parietal thickness near bregma (average) 3 - - Burial 6 - Cranium - - Maximum length 161 - Maximum breadth 150 - Basion-bregma 128 - Bizygomatic 126 - Basi-nasal length 96.5 - Basi-alveolar length 91 - Nasion-alveolar height 68 - Left orbital breadth 43 - Left orbital height 34 - Nasal breadth 24 - Nasal height 52 - Palatal length 46 - Palatal breadth 39 - - Mandible - - Maximum length (76)[1] - Symphysis height 37 - Bigonial diameter (101)[1] - Foramen mentale breadth 49 - - Cranial Indices - - Cranial module 146.33 - Cranial index 93.17 - Height-length index 79.50 - Height-breadth index 85.33 - Upper facial index 54.97 - Nasal index 46.15 - Orbital index 79.07 - - Table 3 - Comparison of Male Stature for Oneota Indians - Utlaut Site Height - - Burial 1 (Oneota) 173.46 cm - Burial 2 (Oneota) 175.9 cm - - Oneota Sites[2] Mean Height - - Leary site (Nebraska) 173.1 cm - Hartley site (Iowa) 164.2 cm - Leary site (Nebraska) 173.1 cm - Flynn site (Iowa) 169.7 cm - Blood Run site (Iowa) 168.2 cm - Correctionville site (Iowa) 171.2 cm - All sites 170.0 cm - - - - - A REPORT OF SALVAGE INVESTIGATIONS AT ST. CHARLES, MISSOURI - - - by J. M. Shippee - -In the latter part of August 1956, Mr. Andrew H. McCulloch of St. -Charles, Missouri addressed a letter to the Department of Anthropology, -University of Missouri, in which he told of the discovery of buried -remains which were thought to be of Indian origin. Road construction in -a new housing area just north of St. Charles, Missouri had exposed an -Indian camp site on high ground overlooking the Missouri-Mississippi -River flood plain. Mr. McCulloch had been informed by the land owner, -Mr. J. D. Wright, that a portion of a grave had been opened, exposing -bones of humans and animals and broken pottery vessels. - -The letter was delivered to Carl H. Chapman, then Director of American -Archaeology at the university, who visited the site and decided that -further investigations were advisable. Professor Chapman directed the -writer to make limited investigations at the site. This work was done in -3 days beginning September 1, with the very capable assistance of -Leonard Blake and Winton Meyer of St. Louis, and Robert Wright of St. -Charles. - -The new road cut which exposed the remains is located at the eastern -edge of an old field, which has an elevation of 90 feet above the river -flood plain. Erosion had removed much of the dark topsoil from above the -light colored loess, which apparently is very deep. At five locations in -the road cut, dark deposits of cultural debris were observed in clearly -defined pits which had been cross-sectioned by the grading machines. -These pits were grouped at the deeper excavations for the road which -were approximately 500 feet apart. At several places, in loose earth -along the road, Indian artifacts were found where the grading operations -had deposited them; their exact provenience is therefore, doubtful. - -Pits _A_ and _B_ were at the north end of the field and were exposed in -the vertical bank at the east side of the new road. Both had been gouged -by curious persons, and nothing is known of the material removed prior -to the work described here. - -Pit _A_ could be clearly defined in outline beneath 28 inches of -overburden. This overburden consisted of 4 inches of top soil and 24 -inches of light colored soil. The pit outlined by the cultural fill -measured 8 inches deep, and had been approximately 40 inches in -diameter. Excavation later revealed that the deposit extended only 13 -inches into the bank, the greater part of the deposit having been -previously removed. The sterile overburden was examined as it was -removed from above the pit. The pit fill was so compact that Blake had -difficulty in examining it. The deposit contained 3 rimsherds (Fig. 1) -and 31 bodysherds in the upper part, and considerable bone scrap of -animals in the lower. A trace of burned clay and a few small lumps of -fired limestone were scattered in the fill. Charred wood was collected -for radiocarbon dating, and according to Dr. J. B. Griffin of the -University of Michigan and Professor H. R. Crane, University of Michigan -Memorial-Phoenix Radiocarbon Laboratory, it was found to be dated -(M-619)—1240±200 years before present, which would give the date before -1950 as A.D. 710±200. Also found in the pit were a few flint flakes and -one crude flint blank. The bones in pit _A_ were thought to be from game -animals and consisted of 5 mandibles and 2 long bones. A large mandible, -from which all the teeth had been removed by pot-hunters, is thought to -be that of a bison. Three mandibles were from deer. - - [Illustration: Figure 1. Pit A pottery] - - a - THE LIP HAS BEEN SMOOTHED. - THE CORDMARKED EXTERIOR SURFACE IS BROWN, THE INTERIOR IS DARK GREY - b - c - EXTERIOR COLOR OF b AND C IS DARK BROWN TO LIGHT BROWN. THE - CORDMARKING IS TYPICAL OF THE SITE, INTERIORS ARE SMOOTH, - COLOR IS A DULL BROWN. THE TEMPER IS CLAY - c - THIS SHERD IS PROBABLY NAPLES DENTATE STAMPED OF THE MIDDLE WOODLAND - OR HOPEWELL COMPLEX. ITS OCCURRENCE IN THIS PIT IS PUZZLING. - -The potsherds from pit _A_ are from large vessels, and with one -exception they have lightly re-smoothed cordmarked exteriors. All sherds -have been smoothed inside. Of the three rimsherds recovered, two have -rounded lips and one a rather flat lip which, in the process of -smoothing, received considerable more burring over the outer edge than -those with the rounded lip. All sherds are hard and clay tempered. The -color of these sherds is a muddy-brown or brownish-grey. An exceptional -sherd from pit _A_ is tan in color, clay tempered except for a few -particles of grit, has a smooth interior and is decorated on the outer -surface with roulette or dentate stamping (Fig. 1, d). - -Pit _B_, located 33 feet south of pit _A_ in the same east bank was -similar, but only a small remnant of it remained after the usual -vandalism. This pit was beneath 24 inches of overburden; it had a -concentration of cultural fill that measured 6 inches in depth and the -diameter had been approximately 30 inches. Small lumps of fired -limestone were scattered through the fill, which included two rimsherds -(Fig. 2, a and b) and 12 small body sherds. One rimsherd is evidently -from a miniature pot. It is smooth inside and out, grey in color, very -hard and without apparent tempering material. The other rimsherd is -similar to those from pit _A_ which have the rounded lips. The body -sherds seem to be from rather large vessels which had cordmarked -exterior surfaces and are clay tempered except for one which was -tempered with grit. One flake of white chert showed usage. - -Pit _C_ was a small, poorly defined deposit of material foreign to the -light colored soil about it. The top of the deposit was 15 inches below -the present surface of the field. Three large cordmarked sherds and a -number of small ones were excavated. There were also bits of burned clay -and a few flint chips. Nearby, in the disturbed earth of the road, -several large, grit tempered and cordmarked sherds were recovered. - -Pit _D_ was exposed partly in the west bank of the road at its southern -end. In addition to the part of the pit exposed in the cutbank, the -horizontal outline of the pit could be traced on the surface of the -graded road. Approximately half the contents of the pit had been graded -away. This pit, which excavation revealed to be 20 inches deep, as -marked by the dark fill, was covered by 18 inches of light colored soil. -The sides belled considerably and the flat, oval bottom measured 4 feet -northwest to southeast by 5 feet northeast to southwest. - - [Illustration: Figure 2. Pits B and D, Artifacts] - - PIT B POTTERY - a - INTERIOR IS DARK GREY - b - FRAGMENT OF A MINIATURE POT SURFACES ARE SMOOTH AND GREY - NO TEMPERING VISIBLE. - SECTION OF CLAY RING - PERFORATED CANINE - CORDMARKED DISC OF TAN COLORED POTTERY - PROJECTILE POINTS ARE FROM FLAKES CHIPPED AROUND THE EDGES - a AND d. ARE OF PINK CHALCEDONY - FLINT FLAKE DRILL - -Over 150 potsherds were recovered; 17 were rims of vessels, nine are -sketched in Figure 3. With few exceptions, these rims were similar to -those from pits _A_ and _B_ and are from large vessels. They were -cordmarked, very hard, and are tempered with clay and some grit. Many -sherds break squarely, others flake badly and even crumble. From these -potsherds, one vessel has been restored sufficiently to give its -characteristics (Fig. 4). The pot, of about 3 quarts capacity, is 8 -inches high, 8 inches at its greatest diameter and is rather thin -walled. It has dark grey paste, is clay tempered, very hard and has fine -vertical cordmarks over the upper body with cordmarks at random below -the shoulder. The smooth interior has small angular impressions or -punctates inside the lip, which is slightly everted. This vessel, -considerably different from the others at the site, is very similar to -one from Arnold-Research Cave which is 70 miles west in Callaway County, -Missouri (Shippee, 1966). The pot from the cave was shell tempered. In a -personal communication of April 13, 1959, Dr. James B. Griffin states -that in theory the pottery from this site can be compared to that from -sites where Canteen grit tempered cordmarked and perhaps Korando clay -tempered cordmarked material is recovered. Of the many sherds recovered -from pit _D_, all are cordmarked or brushed. One sherd is from a vessel -with a thick conical base. - -A baked clay object from pit _D_ seems to be a section of a small ring -(Fig. 2). One unperforated disc of cordmarked pottery was found (Fig. -2). Three projectile points were found (Fig. 2). These points were made -from flakes struck from cores. Two have only primary chipping around the -perimeter; the third has secondary chipping on one edge. Two of the -points were made from a pale pink chalcedony. Of the small number of -flint flakes found, few show evidence of use, but one had been modified -to form a drill (Fig. 2). The perforated canine of a dog or wolf was in -the fill of this pit (Fig. 2). Two antler sections have been altered; -one by a cut which removed the tine and the other by cutting or scraping -to thin it. Bone scrap of fish and animals, mussel shells and burned -limestone fragments occurred in pit _D_. Of the considerable charcoal -recovered from pit _D_, a sample sent to Michigan was dated (M-620) at -930±100 years B.P. or A.D. 1020±100 before 1950. The wood was from a -white ash group, a red oak group and hickory. Identification by R. -Yarnell Nov. 21, 1962. Reported by letter from George J. Armelagos Jan. -28, 1963. - -Pit _E_ contained one rimsherd similar to those numerous on the site, -and 14 body sherds, one of which was from a large vessel having a -conoidal base. Three sherds were from a miniature pot. Pit _E_ was 24 -feet south of pit _D_ and on the same west road bank. It could be -defined below 19 inches of light colored overburden and had a depth of 8 -inches. A radiocarbon date for charcoal from pit _E_ is (M-621)—1180±100 -B.P. or A.D. 770±100 before 1950. The charcoal was from red oak and -white oak groups, as identified by Richard Yarnell at the University of -Michigan. - - [Illustration: Figure 3. Pit D pottery] - - INTERIOR - IMPRESSIONS INSIDE LIP ARE BY A CORD WRAPPED ROD - INTERIOR - EXTERIOR OF THE LARGE RIMS HAVE VERTICAL CORDMARKS, LIP TO SHOULDER - AND AT RANDOM BELOW. - SLIGHT RESMOOTHING IS EVIDENT, COLOR IS BROWN TO BLACK. - ALL PIT D RIMS HAVE CORDMARKED EXTERIORS - LIP AND INTERIOR ARE PREDOMINATELY SMOOTHED - SHERD INTERIOR IS ON RIGHT - - [Illustration: Figure 4.] - - RESTORED FROM PIT D - SMALL DENTATE IMPRESSIONS ARE ON THE INSIDE OF THE LIP. - EXTERIOR - BRUSHED EXTERIOR - INTERIOR - SURFACE OF ROAD - -From the surface of the road there was collected three rimsherds, 20 -body sherds, bone scrap, and a hammerstone which had a pit in two of its -flat faces. Artifacts are reported to have been found on the surface of -the field surrounding this hilltop site, but we found scant evidence of -occupation in the plowed soil. This lack of surface material may be -further evidence of considerable deposition over the pits that were -exposed in the roadway across the site. - -Leonard Blake sent a copy of the original manuscript of this excavation -to Patrick J. Munson of the Department of Anthropology, University of -Illinois, and Mr. Munson kindly submitted comparisons and comments on -the 23SC50 and Late Woodland ceramics in the American Bottoms. The -following is from his letter of June 15, 1966. - -“The pottery shows similarities to both Korondo Cordmarked and what I -call “Early Bluff” (which includes part of what Griffin calls Canteen -Cordmarked and which conforms to part of Titterington’s Jersey Bluff -focus). Korondo and Early Bluff are definitely related in some way -(probably regional variants of what is basically the same cultural -pattern) and your material therefore represents still another variant of -this same pattern. - -The comparisons and contrasts can best be illuminated in the following -table: - - Korondo Early Bluff St. Charles - - Vessel Shape x x x - Mostly Cordmarked x x x - Mostly Sherd Tempered x x - Mostly Grit Tempered x - Squared Lip x - Rounded, “sloppy” lip x x - Interior Lip Cord Wrapped Stick stamp x x x - Interior Lip plain stamp x x - Exterior Lip plain stamp x - Vertical Lip plain stamp x - Undecorated Lip x x x - -As such, your material seems about as similar to one as the other, every -attribute being shared with either Korondo or Early Bluff, or with both. - -Also your radiocarbon dates, or at least the two earliest ones, conform -quite well. Dr. Robert Hall, now of the University of Chicago, has two -dates for a Korondo site in the southern part of the American Bottoms -(Stolle Quarry) AD-700 and 900, and by a process of elimination, Early -Bluff in the northern portion of the Bottoms must date pre-850. (Korondo -is found in the southern part of the Bottoms and south; Early Bluff is -in the northern portion and north.) Your one dentate stamped sherd (Fig. -1) is probably Naples Dentate Stamped, and as such is surely an -accidental inclusion—I doubt if this Middle Woodland type was made later -than A.D. 400 at the latest. Also the largest projectile point from pit -_D_ looks like a sloppy Snyders Point, again a Middle Woodland type and -probably an accident (or a specimen collected by the Late Woodland -peoples). The smallest point from the pit is probably a Late Woodland -Koster Point (cf. Perino, 1963, Central States Arch. Jour., Vol. 10, No. -3, pp. 95-100). - -An attribute you might include in your pottery description is the -direction of twist of cords used in making the cordmarkings; “S” twist -(right hand) and “Z” twist (left hand)—but remember, the impressions on -the pottery are negative, so the _cord was the opposite of the -impressions that you see_. I found the percentage of this attribute -quite significant in separating Early Bluff from Late Bluff.” - - - CONCLUSION - -The three days of salvage archaeology at this site at St. Charles, -Missouri were well rewarded by the information gained and especially by -the recovery of charcoal associated with the artifacts in the pits. The -three radiocarbon dates, with the exception of the late one, must be of -considerable value to archaeologists investigating sites in the Midwest, -and especially those in the vicinity of St. Louis and the American -Bottoms. As for the site, the writer understands that it is totally -built over, but isolated finds during construction work at the location -could provide further important knowledge of the prehistoric Indians who -inhabited the site. The passage of 16 years since the initial -investigation, before this report could be concluded, is further proof -that the archaeologist’s job is a difficult one to pursue, and it is -only by the persistent endeavor and cooperation of the various persons -interested that anything is accomplished. - - - - - FOOTNOTES - - -[1]Parentheses indicate estimated measurement - -[2]Based on data from Table 34, Myers and Bass (n.d.) - - - - - Transcriber’s Notes - - -—Silently corrected a few typos. - -—Retained publication information from the printed edition: this eBook - is public-domain in the country of publication. - -—In the text versions only, text in _italics_ is delimited by - _underscores_. - - - - - - - -End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Missouri Archaeologist, Volume 34, -No. 1 and 2, December 1972, by Various - -*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE MISSOURI ARCHAEOLOGIST *** - -***** This file should be named 63219-0.txt or 63219-0.zip ***** -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: - http://www.gutenberg.org/6/3/2/1/63219/ - - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions -will be renamed. - -Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no -one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation -(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without -permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, -set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to -copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to -protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project -Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you -charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you -do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the -rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose -such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and -research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do -practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is -subject to the trademark license, especially commercial -redistribution. - - - -*** START: FULL LICENSE *** - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project -Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at -http://gutenberg.org/license). - - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy -all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. -If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the -terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or -entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement -and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" -or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the -collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an -individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are -located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from -copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative -works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg -are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project -Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by -freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of -this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with -the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by -keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project -Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in -a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check -the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement -before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or -creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project -Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning -the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United -States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate -access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently -whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, -copied or distributed: - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived -from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is -posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied -and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees -or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work -with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the -work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 -through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the -Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or -1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional -terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked -to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the -permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any -word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or -distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than -"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version -posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), -you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a -copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon -request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other -form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided -that - -- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is - owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he - has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the - Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments - must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you - prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax - returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and - sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the - address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to - the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." - -- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or - destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium - and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of - Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any - money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days - of receipt of the work. - -- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set -forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from -both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael -Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the -Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm -collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain -"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or -corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual -property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a -computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by -your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with -your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with -the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a -refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity -providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to -receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy -is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further -opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER -WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO -WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. -If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the -law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be -interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by -the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any -provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance -with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, -promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, -harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, -that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do -or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm -work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any -Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. - - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers -including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists -because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from -people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. -To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 -and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. - - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive -Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at -http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent -permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. -Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered -throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at -809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email -business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact -information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official -page at http://pglaf.org - -For additional contact information: - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To -SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any -particular state visit http://pglaf.org - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. -To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate - - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm -concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared -with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project -Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. - - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. -unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily -keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. - - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: - - http://www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/old/63219-0.zip b/old/63219-0.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 9142309..0000000 --- a/old/63219-0.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h.zip b/old/63219-h.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index bdd6ae6..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/63219-h.htm b/old/63219-h/63219-h.htm deleted file mode 100644 index 85eea98..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/63219-h.htm +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3206 +0,0 @@ -<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> -<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> -<head> -<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" /> -<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> -<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" /> -<title>The Missouri Archaeologist, Vol. 34 Nos. 1-2: Dec. 1972, edited by Robert T. Bray—a Project Gutenberg eBook</title> -<meta name="author" content="Robert T. Bray" /> -<meta name="pss.pubdate" content="1972" /> -<link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" /> -<link rel="spine" href="images/spine.jpg" /> -<link rel="schema.DC" href="http://dublincore.org/documents/1998/09/dces/" /> -<meta name="DC.Title" content="The Missouri Archaeologist, Vol. 34 Nos. 1-2: Dec. 1972" /> -<meta name="DC.Language" content="en" /> -<meta name="DC.Format" content="text/html" /> -<meta name="DC.Created" content="1972" /> -<meta name="DC.Creator" content="Robert T. Bray" /> -<style type="text/css"> -/* == GLOBAL MARKUP == */ -body, table.twocol tr td { margin-left:2em; margin-right:2em; } /* BODY */ -.box { border-style:double; margin-bottom:2em; max-width:30em; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-top:2em; clear:both; } -.box div.box { border-style:solid; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; max-width:26em; } -.box p { margin-right:1em; margin-left:1em; } -.box dl { margin-right:1em; margin-left:1em; } -h1, h2, h5, .titlepg p { text-align:center; clear:both; text-indent:0; } /* HEADINGS */ -h2 { margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:1em; font-size:110%; text-align:center; font-family:sans-serif; } -h2 .small { font-size:100%; } -h2 .smaller { font-size:90%; } -h1 { margin-top:3em; font-family:sans-serif; } -h1 .likep { font-weight:normal; font-size:50%; } -div.box h1 { margin-top:1em; margin-left:.5em; margin-right:.5em; } -h3 { margin-top:1.5em; text-align:center; font-size: 100%; font-family:sans-serif; clear:both; } -h4 { font-size:100%; text-align:left; clear:right; font-family:sans-serif; } -h5 { font-size:100%; text-align:left; clear:right; font-weight:normal; font-style:italic; } -h6 { font-size:80%; font-weight:normal; text-align:left; } -h6.var { font-size:80%; font-style:normal; } -.titlepg { margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; border-style:double; clear:both; } -span.chaptertitle { font-style:normal; display:block; text-align:center; font-size:150%; text-indent:0; } -.tblttl { text-align:center; text-indent:0;} -.tblsttl { text-align:center; font-variant:small-caps; text-indent:0; } - -pre sub.ms { width:4em; letter-spacing:1em; } -table.fmla { text-align:center; margin-top:0em; margin-bottom:0em; margin-left:0em; margin-right:0em; } -table.inline, table.symbol { display: inline-table; vertical-align: middle; } -td.cola { text-align:left; vertical-align:100%; } -td.colb { text-align:justify; } - -p, blockquote, div.p, div.bq { text-align:justify; } /* PARAGRAPHS */ -div.p, div.bq { margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; } -blockquote, .bq { margin-left:1em; margin-right:0em; } -.verse { font-size:100%; } -p.indent {text-indent:2em; text-align:left; } -p.tb, p.tbcenter, verse.tb, blockquote.tb { margin-top:2em; } - -span.pb, div.pb, dt.pb, p.pb /* PAGE BREAKS */ -{ text-align:right; float:right; margin-right:0em; clear:right; } -div.pb { display:inline; } -.pb, dt.pb, dl.toc dt.pb, dl.tocl dt.pb, dl.undent dt.pb, dl.index dt.pb { text-align:right; float:right; margin-left: 1.5em; - margin-top:.5em; margin-bottom:.5em; display:inline; text-indent:0; - font-size:80%; font-style:normal; font-weight:bold; - color:gray; border:1px solid gray;padding:1px 3px; } -div.index .pb { display:block; } -.bq div.pb, .bq span.pb { font-size:90%; margin-right:2em; } - -div.img, body a img {text-align:center; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:2em; clear:right; } -img { max-width:100%; height:auto; } - -sup, a.fn { font-size:75%; vertical-align:100%; line-height:50%; font-weight:normal; } -h3 a.fn { font-size:65%; } -sub { font-size:75%; } -.center, .tbcenter { text-align:center; clear:both; text-indent:0; } /* TEXTUAL MARKUP */ -span.center { display:block; } -table.center { clear:both; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-top:1.5em; } -table.center tr td.l, table.center tr th.l {text-align:left; margin-left:0em; } -table.center tr td.j {text-align:justify; } -table.center tr td.ltab { text-align:left; width:1.5em; } -table.center tr td.t {text-align:left; text-indent:1em; } -table.center tr td.t2 {text-align:left; text-indent:2em; } -table.center tr td.r, table.center tr th.r {text-align:right; } -table.center tr th.rx { width:4.5em; text-align:right; } -table.center tr th {vertical-align:bottom; } -table.center tr td {vertical-align:top; } -table.inline, table.symbol { display: inline-table; vertical-align: middle; } - -p { clear:left; } -.small, .lsmall { font-size:90%; } -.smaller { font-size:80%; } -.smallest { font-size:67%; } -.larger { font-size:150%; } -.large { font-size:125%; } -.xlarge { font-size:200%; line-height:60%; } -.xxlarge { font-size:200%; line-height:60%; } -.gs { letter-spacing:1em; } -.gs3 { letter-spacing:2em; } -.gslarge { letter-spacing:.3em; font-size:110%; } -.sc { font-variant:small-caps; font-style:normal; } -.unbold { font-weight:normal; } -.xo { position:relative; left:-.3em; } -.over { text-decoration: overline; display:inline; } -hr { width:20%; margin-left:40%; } -hr.dwide { margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; width:90%; margin-left:5%; } -hr.double { margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; width:100%; margin-left:0; margin-right:0; } -hr.f { margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; width:100%; margin-left:0; } -.jl { text-align:left; } -.jr, .jri { text-align:right; min-width:2em; display:inline-block; float:right; } -.pcap .jri { font-size:80%; } -.jr1 { text-align:right; margin-right:2em; } -h1 .jr { margin-right:.5em; } -.ind1 { text-align:left; margin-left:2em; } -.u { text-decoration:underline; } -.hst { margin-left:1em; } -.hst2 { margin-left:2em; } -.rubric { color:red; } -.blue { color:blue; background-color:white; } -.green { color:green; background-color:white; } -.yellow { color:yellow; background-color:white; } -.white { color:white; background-color:black; margin-left:1em; margin-right:1em; max-width:28em; } -.cnwhite { color:white; background-color:black; min-width:2em; display:inline-block; - text-align:center; font-weight:bold; font-family:sans-serif; } -.cwhite { color:white; background-color:black; text-align:center; font-weight:bold; - font-family:sans-serif; } -ul li { text-align:justify; } -u.dbl { text-decoration:underline; } -.ss { font-family:sans-serif; font-weight:bold; } -.ssn { font-family:sans-serif; font-weight:normal; } -.cur { font-family:cursive; } -p.revint { margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; } -i .f { font-style:normal; } -.b { font-weight:bold; } -.i { font-style:italic; } -.f { font-style:italic; font-weight:bold; } - -dd.t { text-align:left; margin-left: 5.5em; } -dl.toc { clear:both; margin-top:1em; } /* CONTENTS (.TOC) */ -.toc dt.center { text-align:center; clear:both; margin-top:3em; margin-bottom:1em; text-indent:0;} -.toc dt { text-align:right; clear:left; } -.toc dd { text-align:right; clear:both; } -.toc dd.ddt { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:4em; } -.toc dd.ddt2 { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:5em; } -.toc dd.ddt3 { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:6em; } -.toc dd.ddt4 { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:7em; } -.toc dd.ddt5 { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:8em; } -.toc dd.note { text-align:justify; clear:both; margin-left:5em; text-indent:-1em; margin-right:3em; } -.toc dt .xxxtest {width:17em; display:block; position:relative; left:4em; } -.toc dt a, -.toc dd a, -.toc dt span.left, -.toc dt span.lsmall, -.toc dd span.left { text-align:left; clear:right; float:left; } -.toc dt a span.cn { width:4em; text-align:right; margin-right:.7em; float:left; } -.toc dt.sc { text-align:right; clear:both; } -.toc dt.scl { text-align:left; clear:both; font-variant:small-caps; } -.toc dt.sct { text-align:right; clear:both; font-variant:small-caps; margin-left:1em; } -.toc dt.jl { text-align:left; clear:both; font-variant:normal; } -.toc dt.scc { text-align:center; clear:both; font-variant:small-caps; text-indent:0; } -.toc dt span.lj, span.lj { text-align:left; display:block; float:left; } -.toc dd.center { text-align:center; text-indent:0; } -dd.tocsummary {text-align:justify; margin-right:2em; margin-left:2em; } -dd.center .sc {display:block; text-align:center; text-indent:0; } -/* BOX CELL */ -td.top { border-top:1px solid; width:.5em; height:.8em; } -td.bot { border-bottom:1px solid; width:.5em; height:.8em; } -td.rb { border:1px solid; border-left:none; width:.5em; height:.8em; } -td.lb { border:1px solid; border-right:none; width:.5em; height:.8em; } -td span.cellt { text-indent:1em; } -td span.cellt2 { text-indent:2em; } -td span.cellt3 { text-indent:3em; } -td span.cellt4 { text-indent:4em; } - -/* INDEX (.INDEX) */ -dl.index { clear:both; } -.index dt { margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left; } -.index dd { margin-left:4em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left; } -.index dd.t { margin-left:6em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left; } -.index dt.center {text-align:center; text-indent:0; } - dl.indexlr { clear:both; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; max-width:32em; } - dl.indexlr dt { clear:both; text-align:left; margin-left:0em; } - dl.indexlr dt span { text-align:left; display:block; float:left; } - dl.indexlr dt.center {text-align:center; text-indent:0; } - dl.indexlr dd { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:1em; } - dl.indexlr dd.t { margin-left:5em; } - dl.indexlr dd span.jl { text-align:left; display:block; float:left; } - -.ab, .ab1, .ab2 { -font-weight:bold; text-decoration:none; -border-style:solid; border-color:gray; border-width:1px; -margin-right:0px; margin-top:5px; display:inline-block; text-align:center; text-indent:0; } -.ab { width:1em; } -.ab2 { width:1.5em; } -a.gloss { background-color:#f2f2f2; border-bottom-style:dotted; text-decoration:none; border-color:#c0c0c0; color:inherit; } - /* FOOTNOTE BLOCKS */ -div.notes p { margin-left:1em; text-indent:-1em; text-align:justify; } - -dl.undent dd { margin-left:3em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:justify; } -dl.undent dt { margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:justify; clear:both; } -dl.undent dd.t { margin-left:4em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:justify; } -dl.undent dd.t2 { margin-left:5em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:justify; } -dl.undent dd.t3 { margin-left:6em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:justify; } - /* POETRY LINE NUMBER */ -.lnum { text-align:right; float:right; margin-left:.5em; display:inline; } - -.hymn { text-align:left; } /* HYMN AND VERSE: HTML */ -.verse { text-align:left; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:0em; } -.versetb { text-align:left; margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:0em; } -.originc { text-align:center; text-indent:0; } -.subttl { text-align:center; font-size:80%; text-indent:0; } -.srcttl { text-align:center; font-size:80%; text-indent:0; font-weight:bold; } -p.lc { text-indent:0; text-align:center; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; } -p.t0, p.l { margin-left:4em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.lb { margin-left:4em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.tw, div.tw, .tw { margin-left:1em; text-indent:-1em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t, div.t, .t { margin-left:5em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t2, div.t2, .t2 { margin-left:6em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t3, div.t3, .t3 { margin-left:7em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t4, div.t4, .t4 { margin-left:8em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t5, div.t5, .t5 { margin-left:9em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t6, div.t6, .t6 { margin-left:10em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t7, div.t7, .t7 { margin-left:11em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t8, div.t8, .t8 { margin-left:12em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t9, div.t9, .t9 { margin-left:13em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t10, div.t10,.t10 { margin-left:14em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t11, div.t11,.t11 { margin-left:15em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t12, div.t12,.t12 { margin-left:16em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t13, div.t13,.t13 { margin-left:17em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t14, div.t14,.t14 { margin-left:18em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.t15, div.t15,.t15 { margin-left:19em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; } -p.lr, div.lr, span.lr { display:block; margin-left:0em; margin-right:1em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:right; } -dt.lr { width:100%; margin-left:0em; margin-right:0em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:1em; text-align:right; } -dl dt.lr a { text-align:left; clear:left; float:left; } - -.fnblock { margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:2em; } -.fndef, p.fn { text-align:justify; margin-top:1.5em; margin-left:1.5em; text-indent:-1.5em; } -.fndef p.fncont, .fndef dl { margin-left:0em; text-indent:0em; } -.fnblock div.fncont { margin-left:1.5em; text-indent:0em; margin-top:1em; } -.fnblock dl { margin-top:0; margin-left:4em; text-indent:-2em; } -.fnblock dt { text-align:justify; } -dl.catalog dd { font-style:italic; } -dl.catalog dt { margin-top:1em; } -.author { text-align:right; margin-top:0em; margin-bottom:0em; display:block; } - -dl.biblio dt { margin-top:.6em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:justify; clear:both; } -dl.biblio dt div { display:block; float:left; margin-left:-6em; width:6em; clear:both; } -dl.biblio dt.center { margin-left:0em; text-align:center; text-indent:0; } -dl.biblio dd { margin-top:.3em; margin-left:3em; text-align:justify; font-size:90%; } -p.biblio { margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; } -.clear { clear:both; } -p.book { margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; } -p.review { margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; font-size:80%; } -p.pcap { margin-left:5em; text-indent:-5em; text-align:justify; margin-top:0; - font-weight:bold; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:90%; } -p.pcap i { font-family:serif; font-weight:normal; } -dl.pcap { font-size:90%; font-family:sans-serif; margin-left:5em; } -p.pcapc { margin-left:4.7em; text-indent:0em; text-align:justify; } -span.attr { font-size:80%; font-family:sans-serif; } -span.pn { display:inline-block; width:4.7em; text-align:left; margin-left:0; text-indent:0; } -</style> -</head> -<body> - - -<pre> - -The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Missouri Archaeologist, Volume 34, No. -1 and 2, December 1972, by Various - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license - - -Title: The Missouri Archaeologist, Volume 34, No. 1 and 2, December 1972 - -Author: Various - -Editor: Robert T. Bray - -Release Date: September 17, 2020 [EBook #63219] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: UTF-8 - -*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE MISSOURI ARCHAEOLOGIST *** - - - - - - - - - - -</pre> - -<div id="cover" class="img"> -<img id="coverpage" src="images/cover.jpg" alt="The Missouri Archaeologist, Vol. 34 Nos. 1-2: Dec. 1972" width="500" height="755" /> -</div> -<div class="box"> -<h1>THE MISSOURI ARCHAEOLOGIST</h1> -<div class="img"> -<img src="images/p0.jpg" alt="The Pamplin Kiln" width="307" height="399" /> -</div> -<p class="center"><span class="b large">Vol. 34 Nos. 1-2<span class="hst"> Dec. 1972</span></span></p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_ii">ii</div> -<p class="tbcenter"><b>THE MISSOURI ARCHAEOLOGIST</b></p> -<hr class="dwide" /> -<p class="center"><b>VOLUME 34, NOS. 1-2 COLUMBIA, MO. DECEMBER, 1972</b></p> -<hr class="dwide" /> -<p class="center">Editor: Robert T. Bray, University of Missouri-Columbia</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">SOCIETY OFFICERS 1972</span> -<br />Henry W. Hamilton, President</p> -<p class="center">VICE-PRESIDENTS</p> -<div class="verse"> -<p class="t0">Leonard W. Blake</p> -<p class="t0">J. Allen Eichenberger</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. H. Lee Hoover</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. Carl H. Chapman, Secretary</p> -<p class="t0">Edward C. Matthews, Jr.</p> -<p class="t0">Clem T. Kelly</p> -<p class="t0">Leo J. Roedl</p> -<p class="t0">David R. Evans, Treasurer</p> -</div> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">TRUSTEES -<br />Harold W. Mohrman, (Chairman)</span></p> -<div class="verse"> -<p class="t0">Leo O. Anderson</p> -<p class="t0">Ramsey Bearden</p> -<p class="t0">Dale Belshe</p> -<p class="t0">John E. Berry</p> -<p class="t0">C. L. Blanton, Jr.</p> -<p class="t0">Freddie Bollinger</p> -<p class="t0">Fred Brandenburger</p> -<p class="t0">Mrs. Mary B. Bruno</p> -<p class="t0">C. Warren Cagle</p> -<p class="t0">Miss Harryette Campbell</p> -<p class="t0">R. I. Colborn</p> -<p class="t0">J. L. Connelly</p> -<p class="t0">Paul Corbin</p> -<p class="t0">J. M. Crick</p> -<p class="t0">Mrs. W. L. Davidson</p> -<p class="t0">W. B. Debo</p> -<p class="t0">Jack Dennis</p> -<p class="t0">Richard V. Dolby</p> -<p class="t0">Terrance Dyche</p> -<p class="t0">Benedict Ellis</p> -<p class="t0">Jim D. Feagins</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. Raymond Felling</p> -<p class="t0">Forrest Femmer</p> -<p class="t0">Charles R. Fiorita</p> -<p class="t0">Maynard A. Fisher</p> -<p class="t0">Michael R. Fisher</p> -<p class="t0">Howell Geiger</p> -<p class="t0">Henry H. Gerdes</p> -<p class="t0">J. W. Gerhardt</p> -<p class="t0">Harold Green</p> -<p class="t0">T. M. Hamilton</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. E. B. Hanan</p> -<p class="t0">Harry L. Harner</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. M. M. Hart</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. William Hayes</p> -<p class="t0">O. Lee Herberger</p> -<p class="t0">J. P. Herring</p> -<p class="t0">Leo P. Hopper</p> -<p class="t0">James G. Houser</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. Shelby Hughes</p> -<p class="t0">Elmo Ingenthron</p> -<p class="t0">Sam C. Irvine</p> -<p class="t0">Sam G. Jones</p> -<p class="t0">James F. Keefe</p> -<p class="t0">Thomas Keel, Jr.</p> -<p class="t0">David Kimbrough</p> -<p class="t0">George W. Kirk</p> -<p class="t0">Claude Knoles</p> -<p class="t0">Miss Margaret Lawlor</p> -<p class="t0">I. H. Lehmer</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. James L. Lowe</p> -<p class="t0">Frank Magre</p> -<p class="t0">Winton O. Meyer</p> -<p class="t0">Steve Miller</p> -<p class="t0">George W. Nichols</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. Peter Nichols</p> -<p class="t0">Charles V. Orr</p> -<p class="t0">W. L. Philyaw</p> -<p class="t0">Mrs. Howard Platz</p> -<p class="t0">Art Province</p> -<p class="t0">Julian D. Pyatt</p> -<p class="t0">Nelson Reed</p> -<p class="t0">Donovan Reynolds</p> -<p class="t0">Ralph G. Roberts</p> -<p class="t0">Paul V. Sellers</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. Francis L. Stubbs</p> -<p class="t0">John W. Taylor</p> -<p class="t0">Floyd Vavak</p> -<p class="t0">John C. Vinton</p> -<p class="t0">George Von Hoffman, Jr.</p> -<p class="t0">James Walden</p> -</div> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">PRESERVATION OF SITES COMMITTEE</span> -<br />J. J. McKinny (Chairman)</p> -<div class="verse"> -<p class="t0">Joseph B. Abell</p> -<p class="t0">Dr. Hugh L. Cutler</p> -<p class="t0">William R. Denslow</p> -<p class="t0">Robert L. Elgin</p> -<p class="t0">Arthur L. Freeman, Jr.</p> -<p class="t0">Genevieve Huss</p> -<p class="t0">Charles E. Martien</p> -<p class="t0">Haysler A. Poague</p> -<p class="t0">Robert M. Seelen</p> -<p class="t0">George U. Shelby, Jr.</p> -<p class="t0">Allen B. Soper</p> -<p class="t0">Frank Stonner</p> -<p class="t0">C. H. Turner</p> -<p class="t0">Art. L. Wallhausen, Jr.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_iii">iii</div> -<h2 id="toc" class="center">CONTENTS</h2> -<dl class="toc"> -<dt><a href="#c1">CLAY PIPES FROM PAMPLIN by Henry W. Hamilton and Jean Tyree Hamilton</a> 1</dt> -<dd><a href="#c2">Acknowledgments</a> 1</dd> -<dd><a href="#c3">Introduction</a> 2</dd> -<dd><a href="#c4">The Home Pipemaking Industry</a> 3</dd> -<dd><a href="#c5">Home Industry Pipe Making Methods</a> 7</dd> -<dd><a href="#c6">The Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company</a> 8</dd> -<dd><a href="#c7">Factory Machinery</a> 11</dd> -<dd><a href="#c8">Factory Firing and Glazing</a> 12</dd> -<dd><a href="#c9">Reed Stems</a> 12</dd> -<dd><a href="#c10">Pipes Made By The Factory</a> 12</dd> -<dd><a href="#c11">Factory Price List of Pipes and Jobbers Discounts, As of 1941</a> 13</dd> -<dd><a href="#c12">Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 14</dd> -<dd><a href="#c13">Conclusions</a> 21</dd> -<dd><a href="#c14">Bibliography</a> 23</dd> -<dt><a href="#c15">THE UTLAUT SITE (23SA162W): AN ONEOTA-HISTORIC MISSOURI BURIAL SITE By Patricia J. O’Brien and Kevin Hart</a> 48</dt> -<dd><a href="#c16">Burial Descriptions</a> 48</dd> -<dd><a href="#c17">Discussion</a> 61</dd> -<dd><a href="#c18">References Cited</a> 65</dd> -<dd><a href="#c19">Appendix: Skeletal Remains from the Utlaut Site by Kevin Hart and Clark Larsen</a> 67</dd> -<dt><a href="#c20">A REPORT OF SALVAGE INVESTIGATIONS AT ST. CHARLES, MISSOURI By J. M. Shippee</a> 75</dt> -</dl> -<h2><span class="small">ILLUSTRATIONS</span></h2> -<dl class="toc"> -<dt class="jl">CLAY PIPES FROM PAMPLIN By Henry W. Hamilton and Jean Tyree Hamilton</dt> -<dt class="small"><span class="lj"><i>Plate</i></span> <i>Page</i></dt> -<dt><a href="#fig1">1. Tools of the Home Pipemaking Industry</a> 26</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig2">2. Pamplin Pipe from the steamboat <i>Bertrand</i></a> 27</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig3">3. Stencils on the Box of Pamplin Pipes from the <i>Bertrand</i></a> 27</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig4">4. The Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company, Inc.</a> 28</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig5">5. Kiln of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe Company</a> 29</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig6">6. Pipe Molding Machine from Pamplin Factory</a> 30</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig7">7. Saggers from the Pamplin Factory</a> 31</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig8">8. Advertising Brochure, Pamplin Pipe Company</a> 32</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig9">9. The “original” Powhatan and other Pamplin Pipe Forms</a> 33</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig10">10. Price List of Pamplin Company Pipe Forms</a> 34</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig11">11. “Tomahawk Pipe,” 1941 Brochure</a> 35</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig12">12. Sales Tag for “Original” Powhatan Pipe</a> 36</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig13">13. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 37</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig14">14. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 38</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig15">15. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 39</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig16">16. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 40</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig17">17. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 41</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig18">18. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 42</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig19">19. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 43</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig20">20. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 44</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig21">21. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 45</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig22">22. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 46</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig23">23. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms</a> 47</dt> -</dl> -<div class="pb" id="Page_iv">iv</div> -<dl class="toc"> -<dt class="small"><span class="lj"><i>Tables</i></span> <i>Page</i></dt> -<dt><a href="#table1">1. Sources of Pipes and Relative Numbers available for Examination</a> 14</dt> -<dt><a href="#table2">2. Identifications Appearing on Certain Pamplin Pipes</a> 15</dt> -</dl> -<dl class="toc"> -<dt class="jl">THE UTLAUT SITE (23SA162W): AN ONEOTA-HISTORIC MISSOURI BURIAL SITE By Patricia J. O’Brien and Kevin Hart</dt> -<dt class="small"><span class="lj"><i>Figures</i></span> <i>Page</i></dt> -<dt><a href="#fig24">1. Floodplain of the Missouri River with Locations of 23SA4, 23SA162W and 23SA162</a> 49</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig25">2. Test Excavations at the Utlaut Site</a> 50</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig26">3. Burial 1, 23SA162W</a> 51</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig27">4. Artifacts from the Utlaut Site</a> 53</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig28">5. Burial 2, 23SA162W</a> 54</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig29">6. Pottery Vessels from the Utlaut Site</a> 55</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig30">7. Burial 3, 23SA162W</a> 56</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig31">8. Burial 4, 23SA162W</a> 58</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig32">9. Burial 6, 23SA162W</a> 59</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig33">10. Pottery Vessels Associated with Burial 6</a> 60</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig34">11. Tibiae of Burial 1</a> 68</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig35">12. Skull Profiles of Burial 3</a> 71</dt> -</dl> -<dl class="toc"> -<dt class="small"><span class="lj"><i>Tables</i></span> <i>Page</i></dt> -<dt><a href="#table3">1. Post-Cranial Measurements and Indices for Skeletal Material from 23SA162W</a> 73</dt> -<dt><a href="#table4">2. Cranial Measurements and Indices, Burials, 2, 6</a> 73</dt> -<dt><a href="#table5">3. Comparison of Male Stature for Oneota Indians</a> 74</dt> -</dl> -<dl class="toc"> -<dt class="jl">A REPORT OF SALVAGE INVESTIGATIONS AT ST. CHARLES, MISSOURI By J. M. Shippee</dt> -<dt class="small"><span class="lj"><i>Figures</i></span> <i>Page</i></dt> -<dt><a href="#fig36">1. Pit A Pottery</a> 77</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig37">2. Pits B and D Artifacts</a> 79</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig38">3. Pit D Pottery</a> 81</dt> -<dt><a href="#fig39">4. Pottery from Pit D and from Surface of Road</a> 82</dt> -</dl> -<div class="pb" id="Page_1">1</div> -<h2 id="c1"><span class="small">CLAY PIPES FROM PAMPLIN</span></h2> -<p class="center">by Henry W. Hamilton & Jean Tyree Hamilton</p> -<h3 id="c2">ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</h3> -<p>We wish to express appreciation to all of the following for their help and -assistance in the preparation of this report. The contributions of some are discussed -in detail in the text, but we are grateful to each and every one.</p> -<p>Miss Wilsie Thornton, Mrs. Bess Franklin Mattox, Stuart M. Farrar and -Jack Price, Pamplin, Virginia.</p> -<p>Dr. Clyde G. O’Brien, M.D.; Calvin Robinson, retired editor; Ray Noble -and William Sperry, Appomattox, Virginia.</p> -<p>Mrs. Aldah B. Gordon, Clerk Circuit Court, Appomattox County, Appomattox, -Virginia.</p> -<p>Vernon C. Womack, Clerk Circuit Court, Prince Edward County, Farmville, -Virginia.</p> -<p>Alford L. Rector, Charles H. Meadows, and Mrs. Charles S. Martin, Appomattox -Court House, National Historic Park, Virginia.</p> -<p>Edward A. Chappell, Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission, Richmond, -Virginia.</p> -<p>Edward F. Heite, formerly with Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission.</p> -<p>Francis B. Fitzgerald, Suffolk, Virginia.</p> -<p>David Dautenhahn, Marshall, Missouri</p> -<p>John W. Walker, John W. Griffin and Richard D. Faust, Southeast Archaeological -Center, National Park Service, Macon, Georgia.</p> -<p>J. Paul Hudson, Jamestown National Historic Park, Virginia.</p> -<p>Rex L. Wilson, Acting Chief, Division of Archaeology and Anthropology, -National Park Service, Washington.</p> -<p>John C. Ewers, Smithsonian Institution, Washington.</p> -<p>Jerome E. Petsche, National Park Service, Washington.</p> -<p>Charles Phillips, Williamstown, Massachusetts.</p> -<p>Miss Mary M. Watts, Times-Dispatch, Richmond, Virginia.</p> -<p>Robert L. Saville, Jr., Lawyers Title Insurance Corp, Richmond Virginia.</p> -<p>Morton L. Wallerstein and Ralph Dombrower, Richmond, Partners in the -last factory operation.</p> -<p>Microfilm Department, Virginia State Library, Richmond.</p> -<p>Miss Eleanor Thompson, Assistant Librarian, Missouri Valley College, -Marshall, Missouri.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_2">2</div> -<p>Mrs. Dorothy Erdmann, Summit County Historical Society, Akron, Ohio.</p> -<p>Floyd Painter, Editor, <i>The Chesopiean</i>, Norfolk, Virginia.</p> -<p>Ronald A. Thomas, State Archaeologist, Dover, Delaware.</p> -<p>Mrs. Elizabeth Schick and L. T. Alexander, Archaeological Society of Delaware, -Wilmington.</p> -<p>R. H. Landon, Minnesota Archaeological Society, Minneapolis.</p> -<p>Howard A. MacCord, Sr., Archaeology Society of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.</p> -<p>Ronald R. Switzer, Bertrand Conservation Laboratory, DeSoto National -Wildlife Refuge, Missouri Valley, Iowa.</p> -<p>The photography is by T. M. Hamilton, Miami, Missouri, except where -otherwise noted.</p> -<p>To the many others who have helped, we also wish to express our thanks.</p> -<h3 id="c3">INTRODUCTION</h3> -<p>This is presented as an aid in the identification of clay pipes from the general -area of Pamplin, Virginia, that might appear in archaeological and historic -sites. Interest in these pipes has been stimulated by their being reported as found -in various sites in the western United States.</p> -<p>The circumstances under which this information has been gathered and the -fact that it has been a number of years since clay pipes were made here, either as -a home industry or commercially by the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing -Company, leave much to be desired. On the other hand, in our work we -have inspected a total of 4,451 Pamplin pipes; of this number 39% were from -the factory grounds, and 61% were from the Thornton Store Site and represented -the home industry, so we feel that the 39 forms presented represent at least a -majority of the pipe forms made at Pamplin.</p> -<p>This is not to say that a similar form could not have been made elsewhere; -however the style, the generally heavier and thicker character of the piece, and -the finish, or lack of it, as well as the usual deep red color of the Virginia clay, -would seem to make these pipes distinctive.</p> -<p>Under the conditions in which these pipes were retrieved it is obvious that -the numbers of the different forms located give little indication of the relative -numbers of the different styles that were manufactured, the popularity of the -various styles, or the relative time of their manufacture.</p> -<p>Nearly all of the pipes examined were retrieved by excavation, by people -who simply happened to become interested; this is equally true whether the -pipes had been made by the factory and excavated out of fill on the old factory -<span class="pb" id="Page_3">3</span> -grounds, or whether they were made at the homes and excavated from the basement -of the old Thornton Store, which through the years had taken them in -trade for merchandise.</p> -<p>In some cases among the pipes examined there were not more than one, or -a few, examples of a certain form. In other cases there were hundreds. Among -the examples available to us there was generally little variation in size within -the same form. We have illustrated the largest and the smallest, since this also -gives an opportunity to note minor variations that may exist between different -molds for the same pipe form. However, a rather wide variation in size was -present in that shown as (<a href="#fig13">Plate 13</a> A), the “Original” Powhatan, where a total -of 12 gradations from largest to smallest were found.</p> -<p>The predominant color of the pipes is dark red. A lighter color is infrequently -present, running from almost yellow, to salmon, to light brown. The -very dark, almost black coloration of some is said to come either from minerals -present in the soil of this area, to which the pipes presented here had been subjected -since nearly all had been many years underground, or from actual fire that -had fallen into the saggers of the Company kiln, or the iron pots in which the -pipes had been fired in the home industry.</p> -<p>During the last years of factory operation “some white clay from either -West Virginia or Kentucky was shipped in by railroad”. This resulted in pipes -of a lighter color, at times light grey to white. Apparently no pipes made from -this particular clay were seen by us, except possibly those illustrated in <a href="#fig23">Plate 23</a> -AJ.</p> -<h3 id="c4">THE HOME PIPEMAKING INDUSTRY</h3> -<p>Well established local tradition indicates that clay pipemaking in the homes, -for home and neighborhood use, started almost as soon as the first settlers reached -the area, and after the suitability of the local clay was discovered. Initial county -organization in this part of Virginia was well underway by the 1740’s.</p> -<p>Bradshaw’s <i>History of Prince Edward County</i>, Virginia, 1955, p. 5 states, <i>Batho -Austin road to be cleared from the Appomattox River near Colonel Richard Randolph’s -quarter to Hill’s Fork on Vaughan’s Creek by all who lived near the route and were -not employed on other roads. 1742.</i></p> -<p>Vernon C. Womack, Clerk of the Circuit Court, Prince Edward County, in -a personal letter states, “Since the south fork of Vaughan’s Creek originates a -short distance from where the pipe factory was later located in Pamplin, this -might be the starting point. John Wood’s map of Prince Edward County, dated -1820 which shows that part that was later cut off to form Appomattox County, -gives a detail network of roads through Kelso’s Old Store, which appears to be -near the present location of Pamplin.”</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_4">4</div> -<p><i>There were stores at Sandy River, Wm. and Samuel Matthew had a store at -Walker’s Church, and Kelso’s Old Store was between Walker’s Church and Merriman’s -Shop</i> (now Pamplin).” The statement is footnoted <i>John Wood map</i>, 1820. (Bradshaw, -1955:319).</p> -<p><i>Merriman’s Shop Post Office, 94 miles from Richmond, 185 miles from Washington.</i> -(Martin, 1835:269).</p> -<p><i>Advertisement for renewal of bids for rural route for port office in Merriman’s -Shop in 1843-1848</i> (Bradshaw, 1955:315).</p> -<p>The area that was later to become Appomattox County had been, successively, -included in the areas of several earlier and larger counties. Appomattox -County was formed in 1845. The railroad came through Merriman’s Shop in -1854, and was renamed Pamplin. The Appomattox County Courthouse burned -and the county records were destroyed by fire on February 2, 1892 (Communication -from Mrs. Aldah Gordon).</p> -<p>Mrs. Bess Franklin Mattox reported, “Nicholas Pamplin, a resident of Merriman’s -Shop, was the only citizen who permitted the railroad to go through -his land without charge and so the village was renamed for him” (Mattox, personal -communication). For a time it was known as Pamplin Depot, then Pamplin -City, finally simply Pamplin.</p> -<p>The home manufacture of pipes has had a long history in this part of Virginia -and can be considered as well underway by the 1740s. It existed long before -the Company came to Pamplin and continued after the Company had ceased -operations, or as long as there was an active demand for clay pipes.</p> -<p>The Home Industry finally came to a close in 1953. “Mrs. Betty Price of -Appomattox County was the last to make pipes. I have a mold used by her. She -made them from childhood and in her prime could make 40,000 pipes per year, -having been taught by her mother in 1866 when she was eight years old. Her -mother had made them a lifetime before her. In the last year of Mrs. Betty -Price’s life, 1953, she made 500 pipes at the age of 95. They were made from -clay from her own farm.” (Personal letter from Dr. Clyde G. O’Brien of Appomattox, -and her son, Jack Price of Pamplin).</p> -<p>A column by the <i>News-Leader</i> correspondent from Appomattox, April 30, -(year unknown) said, <i>Hollywood bar reached all the way to Pamplin to get Mrs. -Betty Price’s pipes for use by the Indians in the movie, “Northwest Mounted Police”. -Cecil B. DeMille’s research man ferreted out the Powhatan pipe some months before the -film went into production. Several dozen were ordered. Frank Lloyd also bought pipes -to be used in the production of “Howards of Virginia”.</i></p> -<p>Practically speaking, all of the pipes made at the homes were made by white -women, and from about the time of the first settlement of the territory, as the -special suitability of the local clay for that purpose was early discovered.</p> -<p>Miss Wilsie Thornton of Pamplin said that this industry had become especially -important after the War Between the States, because with so many men -having been killed and the area in such straitened circumstances, the women -<span class="pb" id="Page_5">5</span> -were badly in need of some means of making a living. The pipes they made -could be traded at several general stores, or sold for a few cents, and there was -no cost for materials.</p> -<p>One such establishment at which the local women disposed of their pipes -was J. R. Franklin & Co., of Pamplin. Some of these pipes were recovered when -the cargo of the sternwheeler, <i>Bertrand</i>, which sank in the Missouri River at -Port La Force, Nebraska, April 1, 1865, (Petsche, 1970:1) was salvaged in 1968-69. -The official list of artifacts recovered in the salvage operation, supplied by -Jerome E. Petsche, National Park Service, who was in charge of that operation -shows:</p> -<p><i>Pipes, Smoking; Several types and sizes recovered; briars and clay; one lot included -clay bowls exclusively, others contained stems and bowls. Consignee: Vivian and Simpson, -Virginia City. Manufacturer’s stenciling</i>: ‘THE CELEBRATED VIRGINIA -POWHATAN (CLAY), J. R. FRANKLIN & CO., SOLE AGENTS FOR -THE MANUFACTURERS, PAMPLIN DEPOT, APPOMATTOX COUNTY, -VA.’ Field lot numbers MPC 104, MPC 358, FSC 171.</p> -<p>The following description of the pipe shipment on the <i>Bertrand</i> was provided -by Ronald R. Switzer, Director, Bertrand Conservation Laboratory, National -Park Service, Missouri Valley, Iowa.</p> -<p>“The pipes are of one type and design (<a href="#fig2">Plate 2</a>). Forty pipe bowls plus 136 -fragments ... all but 15 are chipped or broken, condition otherwise good. Clay, -predominantly grayish-tan, mottled with brick red and brown. Paste soft, fine, -and uniform, ... exterior has soft sheen. Preservation: Brushed with soft bristle -brush in running tap water to remove mud.” (Switzer, personal communication).</p> -<p>This pipe is similar to (<a href="#fig19">Plate 19</a> U); however, there are slight variations due -to differences in individual molds made for production of the same pipe form.</p> -<p>The two pipe forms (<a href="#fig19">Plate 19</a> T & U), were the only examples we found -that carried the peculiar pinkish-gray tan color, and they were found only among -the pipes made by the Home Industry. They were probably made of clay from -the same source and by the same individual, since home pipemakers usually dug -their clay on their own premises, and the condition of the pipes, after a century -in mud and moisture, indicates that the work was done well.</p> -<p>The shipment was contained in a wooden box, which was approximately -15½ inches long, 8½ inches wide, and 8 inches tall (<a href="#fig2">Plate 2</a>). The stenciling -on the box is faint, but legible.</p> -<p>“Lettering on the top of the box indicated the consignee but is so faded -that it was impossible to obtain a good photograph; however the stencil once -read,—B. A. L. Vivian & Simpson, Virginia City, M. T.” (<a href="#fig3">Plate 3</a>) (Switzer, -personal communication).</p> -<p>“One end of the box was lettered, No. 1, 216, M. Size” (<a href="#fig3">Plate 3</a>). The -meaning of this can only be conjectured, however it may have indicated shipment -No. 1, to this consignee; containing 216 pipes; of Medium size.</p> -<p>The stencils identifying the consignor, J. R. Franklin & Co., appeared on -<span class="pb" id="Page_6">6</span> -both sides of the box and were identical (<a href="#fig3">Plate 3</a>). The same, except in abbreviated -form, appeared diagonally on one end of the box.</p> -<p>The account book of the store at New Store, Virginia, about 23 miles northeast -of Pamplin, which is in the collections at Appomattox Courthouse, records -that on Sept. 1, 1866, I. H. Schenault was paid $8.00 for 1,600 pipes, and later, -(apparently the same day) was paid $8.75 for 2,175 pipes. The latter was evidently -a partial and immediate “in trade” transaction.</p> -<p>So in the Pamplin area in the 1860s general stores were taking clay pipes -made in the home industry, allowing about ½¢ each in trade for commodities, -and at least in one instance were shipping them west for use by the miners in -the gold fields.</p> -<p>Mrs. Betty Price has said that the Powhatan “Original” (<a href="#fig13">Plate 13</a> A) the -“Hamburg” (<a href="#fig14">Plate 14</a> F) and the “Zuvee” or “Zoo” -(<a href="#fig19">Plate 19</a> T) were some of -the first pipe forms made in the area. (<i>News-Leader</i>, April 30, year unknown).</p> -<p>Many of the clay pipes made at homes near Pamplin were traded for commodities -at the Thornton General Store in Pamplin, and this store was truly -“general”, for it handled, in addition to groceries, everything from threshing -machines and horsepower mills to silk thread.</p> -<p>Miss Wilsie Thornton had a copy of her Father’s letterhead: the letter was -dated, Jan. 9, 1892. The letterhead reads,—</p> -<p class="center"><i>W. D. THORNTON, DEALER. -<br />General Merchandise and Agricultural Implements. -<br />Wholesale dealer in All Styles of Clay Pipes and Stems -<br />Manufacturer’s Agent for -<br />Aultman and Taylor Threshers, Horse Power and Farm Engines. -<br />Also Buckeye Reapers & Mowers & Thornmill Wagons.</i></p> -<p>“The pipes made by the local women,” Miss Thompson said, “were -traded to the Thornton Store for the necessities of life. The pipes were stored -in the basement of the store and packed in barrels, in either pine needles or sawdust, -and shipped to the Baltimore Bargain House, or to other wholesale houses. -From the wholesale houses they were shipped to the Cotton States and to the -West. Large orders were filled for a tobacco factory in Pennsylvania, where they -sold bags of tobacco with the pipes.”</p> -<p>Pamplin pipes have been reported from the sites of Fort Laramie, Wyoming; -Fort Sanders, Wyoming; Fort Stambaugh, Wyoming; Fort Phil Kearny, -Wyoming; Fort Union, New Mexico; Fort Sully, South Dakota; and Fort Davis, -Texas (Wilson, 1971).</p> -<p>Miss Thornton’s parents were married in 1874, but the store was already in -operation at that time. Her father continued operation until his death, December -16, 1897; after that the store was run by her brother. A bank, the “Farmer’s -and Merchant’s National Bank” was also operated in the store. In later years the -building became a drug store.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_7">7</div> -<p>Finally with time and disuse the old building came down and erosion, with -perhaps some intentional filling of the area, took place. So the site of the old -general store, which in its heyday had meant so much to Pamplin and Appomattox -County and its people in their daily living, became simply a vacant area.</p> -<p>Some years ago Miss Thornton had made a train trip and met an old colored -woman in a rest room to which they had both gone to smoke. (When we met -her, Miss Thornton chain-smoked at the age of 89). The colored woman had a -sack of tobacco and pulled out a clay pipe which Miss Thornton recognized as -of the kind that her father used to take in trade, so she asked the woman if it -was a good one.</p> -<p>The woman answered, “Law, yes, but I can’t buy them any more!” so Miss -Thornton told her that it was made long ago, in her home town, and that she -would try to get her some.</p> -<p>Her next problem was to find some pipes. After several days she thought of -the pipes that she felt sure were covered with earth and still in the basement of -her father’s old store, so she talked to her cousin and next door neighbor, Mrs. -Bess Franklin Mattox.</p> -<p>Shortly after that, they dug at the site. Mrs. Mattox thinks it was around -1958, though possibly 2 years earlier. “Erosion through the years had covered -the pipes and when we first started to dig we found none, then there they were, -under the dirt. We found two or three sugar barrels full. Tar was on a few of -the pipes, from road tar that was also stored in the basement and spilled”. (This -tar, in hard-dried rough spots, is present on some of the pipes we examined; -however it chips off readily and leaves the pipe relatively clean).</p> -<p>So the colored woman who couldn’t find a Pamplin pipe to buy received -“either 15 or 16” and Miss Thornton received a letter of thanks from her from -Atlanta.</p> -<p>Miss Thornton still had approximately 1,450 of the home manufactured -pipes for us to see when we visited her in July 1969, and Mrs. Mattox had a -few.</p> -<p>Dr. Clyde G. O’Brien of Appomattox has had a lifelong interest in the clay -pipes of his area and in the history of their manufacture. He has a collection of -pipes as well as two pipe molds, and has given us much information.</p> -<h3 id="c5">HOME INDUSTRY PIPE MAKING METHODS</h3> -<p>We asked Dr. O’Brien for an account of the method of making pipes in -the homes. The following is his contribution, in a letter dated March 11, 1971.</p> -<p>“I talked to Jack Price, age 86, he had worked in the plant for years. His -mother, Mrs. Betty Price, and grandmother made pipes at home in Pamplin.</p> -<p>“The clay was made up and put into molds, when the pipe was removed -from the mold the shaper was used to smooth mold marks, if the pipe was to -be identified with ‘Original’, ‘Hayiti’, or some other marking this was impressed -<span class="pb" id="Page_8">8</span> -on the base with a stamp at this time. The pipe was then sun-dried on a board -in summer, or in the stove oven in winter. Then after they had ‘set-up’ the pipes -were put into an iron pot, the pots were put into an oven in the back yard and -dry chestnut wood was placed around the pots and this was then set on fire. -They did not have a thermometer so he did not know the temperature, but -when the wood had burned completely the pipes were brought out to cool.</p> -<p>“If a piece of wood fell into the burning pot and started to smoke it was -removed at once to keep from blackening or staining the pipes.</p> -<p>“After the pipes cooled they were brought into the house and Mr. Price -said that when the pipes were poured out of the pot in which they were baked, -to the floor, they would ring or chime when they hit against each other.</p> -<p>“The pipes were then waxed with bee’s wax and mutton tallow and then -polished with a woolen cloth, and the children helped.”</p> -<p>In all of this, Bob Davis of Pamplin, age 91, in talking to John W. Walker in -1962, had concurred. He said, “The pipes were molded, trimmed, put on a board -and dried in the sun, baked in iron pots, waxed, and rubbed. The pipes were made -all through the country, the local stores bought and shipped them, and the -Factory would buy these ‘country pipes’.” Here was more direct evidence that -the Factory, on occasion at least, bought and shipped pipes made by the Home -Industry (Walker, personal communication).</p> -<p>There were, however, two men who made pipes.</p> -<p>Dr. O’Brien’s father Thomas O’Brien, was born in 1843. When he came -back after the War, about 1865, he made his own mold of white-oak with lead -lining and made pipes for his own use.</p> -<p>According to Miss Wilsie Thornton, a Mr. Rodgers was making molds and -pipes until about 1938 as a hobby. One of them was in the form of an Indian -head (<a href="#fig23">Plate 23</a> AL). The “peach seed” pipe (<a href="#fig23">Plate 23</a> AM) is also thought to -be one of his manufacture.</p> -<h3 id="c6">THE PAMPLIN SMOKING PIPE AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY</h3> -<p>In the middle 1850’s that part of Ohio that surrounds Akron was the pipemaking -capital of the United States, with at least six clay products companies -producing them (Blair, 1965:26-30). The leading producer of clay smoking pipes -in the Akron vicinity was the E. H. Merrill Co., which had been producing pottery -objects since its founding in 1831. In 1843 or 1844 Calvin, brother of E. H. Merrill, -invented a machine for making pipes which greatly increased the output of the -company and gave quite an advantage over its competitors (Blair, 1965:3).</p> -<p>The Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company, Inc., was established -by the Akron Smoking Pipe Company of Akron, Ohio, when they built -the plant at Pamplin.</p> -<p>That the clay in Appomattox County was well suited to pipe manufacture -was well known. The establishment of this plant was no doubt the result of the -<span class="pb" id="Page_9">9</span> -Company’s realization of the availability of the fine red clay from which the local -women were producing pipes, a clay that could be used without even sifting.</p> -<p>When the Pamplin Factory was established is quite uncertain. Examination -of the microfilm of newspapers of the area that were available from the Virginia -State Library, beginning February 3, 1869 through December 25, 1896, gave no -clue to the date of the establishment of the Pamplin Factory, nor did county -records, probably due to the fire of 1892.</p> -<p><i>Sometime immediately prior to 1880 William Merrill of Akron, Ohio, undoubtedly -a member of the pipe making family, established a pipe making factory at Pamplin.</i> -(Omwake, 1967:23). Our Pamplin informants were of the opinion that the Akron -plant was devoted to the manufacture of drain tile after the pipe machinery -was moved to Pamplin.</p> -<p>Bob Davis of Pamplin, born 1871, in an interview with John W. Walker in -September 1962, said, “I was a kid when the factory came in”. Timewise this -would be in general agreement with Omwake’s estimate for the date of the establishment -of the factory at Pamplin.</p> -<p>That Pamplin pipes were also available from Akron in 1893 is evidenced by -a letterhead of the Akron Smoking Pipe Company, dated June 26, 1893, showing -examples of two clay pipes similar to <a href="#fig22">Plate 22</a> AF & AG, (Blair, 1965:36). -A communication from the Summit County Historical Society reports, “The -Akron Smoking Pipe Co. is recorded as being in business from 1891 to 1895, -and were manufacturers of stone, Powhatan Clay, and corn cob tobacco pipes. -Daily capacity 100,000 pipes. General offices, Akron, Ohio. Factories, Pamplin -City, Virginia; Mogadore, Ohio.”</p> -<p>Statements in company literature are also confusing. In a leaflet which carries -a testimonial for their pipes, dated April 28, 1941 and price lists “effective -November 15, 1941”, the statement is made, <i>from careful search of the records, this -factory started more than 200 years ago ... the present plant has been in operation for -44 years. Skilled American labor is used in a modern, day-lit plant with special attention -to cleanliness, sanitation, and ideal working conditions</i> (<a href="#fig8">Plate 8</a>).</p> -<p>This would give a date for the “present plant” of 1897, but it also suggests -that an earlier plant had been rebuilt or replaced. (An undated and unidentified -news clipping does state that at some time the pipe plant had burned). Company -literature also states, “Established 1739” (<a href="#fig8">Plate 8</a>). This obviously cannot -refer to the establishment of the plant, nor even to the mother plant at Akron, -since pottery was first produced in Summit County, Ohio, in 1828 (Blair, 1965:2). -The Company may simply have been employing “poet’s license” and appropriated -a date which they felt representative of the start of the Home Pipe Making -Industry in the Pamplin area.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_10">10</div> -<p>The <i>Times-Virginian</i> of Appomattox, date unknown, carried a news article, -<i>Pamplin Clay Pipe Plant once termed largest in the World</i>. The <i>Farmville Herald</i> of -March 29, 1935 stated, ... <i>the output of the Clay Pipe Factory at Pamplin is 1,000,000 -a month, when it is running full time. In the roster of business in Virginia, this factory -is mentioned as the largest clay pipe factory in the United States, and so far as is -known, in the world.</i></p> -<p>At one point in the history of the plant, pipes were sold to England as well -as some other countries in Europe.</p> -<p>Also vague has been the terminal date of the Pamplin Company; it is variously -given locally as 1948 to 1951.</p> -<p>There is a contemporary news article on the factory published in the <i>Richmond -Times-Dispatch</i>, April 21, 1946. <i>A History of Appomattox, Virginia</i>, published -1948, states, <i>The Akron Pipe Factory of Pamplin holds the title of manufacturing the -finest clay smoking pipes in the world, known as the ‘Powhatan’</i> (Featherstone, 1948:44).</p> -<p>In a personal letter to the writers, John C. Ewers said, “During my field -work on the Fort Peck Reservation in Montana, in 1953, I first learned of the -Pamplin clay pipes. One of my Indian informants told me about selling them -when he was working at a trading post on the reservation during the first decade -of the present century....</p> -<p>“Later I visited the trading post at Oswego on the Fort Peck Reservation. -There the proprietor showed me the illustrated price list of the Pamplin Smoking -Pipe and Manufacturing Company, Inc. He showed me the only type of pipe -he still had in stock—the ‘Century of Progress’, Chicago type (<a href="#fig23">Plate 23</a> AJ). He -said the manufacturer wrote him in 1951 that he planned to go back into the -manufacture of the other styles, which the Assiniboine preferred.”</p> -<p>The Tomahawk pipe was a good specialty item for sale at such events as -fairs and expositions, and the Company’s sales to the “Century of Progress” in -Chicago in 1933 must have been excellent, even though they had not sold all -they had made in anticipation of that demand. The bowl, necessarily narrow and -elongated since it was in the blade of the tomahawk, did not recommend it to -serious smokers, nor to the Assiniboine.</p> -<p>It would seem evident that these pipes were left over from the production -of the Company in 1933, that their regular pipe models had by this time been -sold out, and that the Company was already in a State of quiescence in 1951.</p> -<p>Dr. Clyde G. O’Brien of Appomattox stated that the Company ceased operations -in 1951.</p> -<p>The Charter of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company -shows that it was incorporated by the Commonwealth of Virginia on the 15th -day of August, 1929. The officers at that time were, J. V. Lewis, Pres., Prospect, -Virginia; J. W. Franklin, V.Pres., Pamplin; L. N. Ligon, V.Pres., Pamplin; T. R. -Pugh, Secy-Treas., Pamplin.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_11">11</div> -<p>The purposes of the Company then were, among other things, to deal in -wood of all kinds, own timber lands, contract to do construction work, deal in -real estate, <i>and to buy and sell all kinds of necessary material ... and operate all the -necessary equipment and machinery for the purpose of manufacturing clay pipes, crocks, -and earthenware</i>.... (Charter Book No. 1, Page 108, Appomattox County, Virginia). -The corporation (Charter No. 34565-16) was dissolved by the State Corporation -Commission, at the request of the stockholders, on February 21, 1952.</p> -<p>A personal communication, February 23, 1972, from Morton L. Wallerstein -who with Ralph L. Dombrower as corporate officers were the last active operators -of the pipe factory, states, “Mr. Dombrower and myself, as sole stockholders, -started the operation in 1938 and baked the clay pipes up to the time of the -enactment of the Minimum Wage Law by Congress. At that time it was apparent -that the part-time workers, largely farm girls and boys who worked in the -afternoon, would cease to be employed because the pipes could not be marketed -under the wages required to be paid.</p> -<p>“However, Mrs. Betty Price and another woman made the hand-made clay -pipes at their homes, which pipes Mr. Dombrower bought after 1938 and very -cleverly boxed in antique fashion and sold them for some years. However, unfortunately -the women who made these pipes died and they were no longer -made.</p> -<p>“The factory, itself, did not manufacture pipes beyond the period stated -above. The property was sold in 1947 and the corporation was dissolved in 1952.”</p> -<p>Apparently then, the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company -ceased all activity in 1951, having been in existence slightly more than 70 years.</p> -<p>Some time after the closing, the main factory building was used as a garage. -In July of 1969 this frame building, with the name “Pamplin Smoking Pipe and -Manufacturing Co., Inc., American Indian Clay Smoking Pipes” still painted -above the entrance, stood unoccupied; the crumbling old smokestack and large -round kiln of brick construction were still there (Plates <a href="#fig4">4</a> & <a href="#fig5">5</a>). Another building -which had served Company purposes had been destroyed.</p> -<h3 id="c7">FACTORY MACHINERY</h3> -<p>The machinery to mold smoking pipes and bottles was invented by Calvin -J. Merrill of the E. H. Merrill Pottery, Summit County, Ohio, in 1843 (Blair, -1965:3).</p> -<p>The pipe machine was simple: the individual metal molds in the foot powered -mechanism could be changed to vary the pipe form. The whole was contained -in a simple wooden bench (<a href="#fig6">Plate 6</a>). Miss Wilsie Thornton felt that a -man working such a machine could produce thousands of pipes per day. It is -unknown how many such machines were used by the factory, nor how many -people were employed since ideas of our informants varied; however, the best -estimate seems to be 8 to 10 machines, with employees varying from 10 to 40, -depending upon the press of work and the rush of orders at any given time.</p> -<p>Bob Davis of Pamplin, in the interview with John W. Walker said, “Old -man Taz Harvey made the Powhatan mold. He had a shop and made many -molds”.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_12">12</div> -<h3 id="c8">FACTORY FIRING AND GLAZING</h3> -<p>The pipes were packed in round stoneware crocks or saggers made from -fireclay, and the saggers were stacked alternately around the kiln. The saggers -were some eight inches high and 16 to 18 inches in diameter (<a href="#fig7">Plate 7</a>). There -was an opening in the top of the kiln through which, in glazing, salt was put -when the pipes were hot. They were fired some 24 or 48 hours (Miss Thornton’s -statement).</p> -<p>Mrs. Maddox said: “As a child I used to go with a colored man who worked -with us and also for the factory, and watch him throw salt down a hole in the -top of the kiln on the pipes to make a glaze.”</p> -<p>At a high temperature the salt vaporized and combined with the silica in -the body of the clay to form a glassy or ‘silicate glaze’. The kiln was fired 32 to -36 hours before maximum temperature was reached; it was cooled the same period -to prevent crazing (minute cracking) of the glaze (Blair, 1965:15). This description -of glazing refers to stoneware in the mid-nineteenth century potteries -near Akron, Ohio. However since the Pamplin kiln was the same sort of “walk-in” -kiln, the detail would fit, and it is substantiated by Miss Thornton’s statement -of firing time.</p> -<p>From the scarcity of glazed pipes among the many that we examined, we -conclude that the majority were finished without glazing.</p> -<h3 id="c9">REED STEMS</h3> -<p>The stems sold with the factory pipes were made from switch cane <i>Arundinara -gigantea</i> known locally as reed and once abundant in the Great Dismal -Swamp in southeastern Virginia (R. H. Woodling to Chas. H. Meadows, May -15, 1969). (The stems used with the pipes made by the Home Industry usually -came from the same source.)</p> -<p>The reeds were cut in 12 foot lengths by men in boats, allowed to dry for -six months, cut in lengths and reamed out. Some were put in a machine and -bent (Miss Thornton, Dr. O’Brien).</p> -<p>Cork plugs or washers were used in the base of the pipes to hold the stem -in place. Some were still in place in pipes we examined. A plug mill, a high -pressure machine, extruded the cork plugs which were cut off by wire (Heite).</p> -<p>(Replacement reed stems for clay, hickory, or corn cob pipes, retailed in the -grocery stores in Lexington, Missouri, for 10¢ per dozen about 1916).</p> -<h3 id="c10">PIPES MADE BY THE FACTORY</h3> -<p>A number of people and institutions with varying numbers of Pamplin Factory -pipes in their possession have given us an opportunity to examine them. -The largest number of specimens were in the hands of the following.</p> -<p>Our attention was first called to these pipes in 1968 at the Craft Club in -<span class="pb" id="Page_13">13</span> -Arrow Rock, Missouri, where some of them appeared for sale as an unusual -item. They obviously had been underground, for the bowls and bases were still -filled with earth containing numerous rootlets growing through the pipe cavities.</p> -<p>It was learned that the pipes had been supplied by Francis B. Fitzgerald, -Suffolk, Virginia; David I. Dautenhahn, Marshall, Missouri, put us in touch -with him. As a youngster, Fitzgerald had on various occasions visited his grandfather’s -farm, which was near the Pamplin Factory, and had played in the water -of a little creek on pipe plant property. In so doing, he discovered that there -were numerous clay pipes in a bank which apparently had been placed in the -creek to form a dam. (The dam was probably for the purpose of retaining water -to mix with the clay). He had hundreds of these pipes. Practically none would -seem to have been rejects—how or why they got into the dirt which was used -to make the fill is unknown. Through the years Fitzgerald had made a selection -of forms representative of this group, all of which he made available to us.</p> -<p>Since that time an owner of the pipe plant property had secured many pipes, -later acquired by the Appomattox National Historic Park. They were made available -to us by Alford L. Rechtor, Superintendent.</p> -<p>The Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission supplied photographs of -some Pamplin pipes, as well as photographs of a pipe mold and pipe maker’s -bench (<a href="#fig6">Plate 6</a>) and saggers (<a href="#fig7">Plate 7</a>). We were granted the use of these by Edward -F. Heite and Edward A. Chappell of that institution.</p> -<p>John W. Walker of the National Park Service, who had worked in the area -and become interested in the pipes made there, provided us with a copy of his -field notes and some examples of pipes.</p> -<p>John C. Ewers of the Smithsonian Institution had visited Pamplin. He gave -us much information and showed us several pipe forms from the area that are -in the collections of that institution.</p> -<p>Rex L. Wilson, National Park Service, loaned us a copy of his manuscript, -“Clay Tobacco Pipes from Fort Laramie, Wyoming and Related Sites”, in which -he identified some specimens as having come from Pamplin.</p> -<h3 id="c11">FACTORY PRICE LIST OF PIPES AND JOBBERS DISCOUNTS, AS OF 1941.</h3> -<p>The Company’s price list of November 1941 listed “The Powhatan Machine -Made”, fitted with cork closures and 10″ reed stems, bowls trade-marked, -packed 50 to box, 25¢ retailer. Price $6.00 per box.” (<a href="#fig10">Plate 10</a>).</p> -<p>Five other models were listed, “5 in. reed stems, packed 100 to box, 15¢ -retailer. Price $3.00 per box.” Two models were listed similarly, but 10¢ retailers, -price $2.50 per box. Two other 10¢ retailers were listed at $2.70 per box, and -one model at $2.85 per box but the suggested retail price was still 10¢ each.</p> -<p>One model, their “Ole Virginny Hamburg”, was offered in finest fire-clay, -hard-burned, white, simulates meerschaum, also in red. Similar to “Ole Virginny -Shaker”. It was a 10¢ retailer, $2.70 per box of 100. (It is of interest that this -<span class="pb" id="Page_14">14</span> -pipe, listed elsewhere in this same price list, but as “Ole Virginny Shaker of -Virginia red clay, a heavier stone pipe”, was priced as a 15¢ retailer and $3.00 -per box). (<a href="#fig10">Plate 10</a>).</p> -<p>Jobbers discounts were offered. “10 to 20 boxes, 20%”, and going up by 5% -stages to “101 to 500 boxes, 35% discount”. “We make many other styles of -Indian Clay and Stone Pipes, ... we can make any style of pipe that can be made -of clay. Our own designers and artists are at your service” (<a href="#fig11">Plate 11</a>).</p> -<p>In the last years of Factory operation their sales carried an identification tag, -“This Is An ‘Original’ Powhatan Pipe”, and it was being made by the last two -women of the Pamplin area who were still making pipes at their homes (<a href="#fig12">Plate 12</a>).</p> -<h3 id="c12">PAMPLIN AREA PIPE FORMS</h3> -<p>The pipes are illustrated natural size. The largest and the smallest pipe of -each form available to us are shown. In many instances this difference in size -is not great; however, it does illustrate that minor variations often existed in -different molds for the same pipe form. The diameters for the stem openings -have not been included since they have proved useful only in consideration of -the earlier integral-stem clays, and not for consideration of the “short-base” pipes -of the type and time included in this report (Wilson, 1971:2).</p> -<table class="center"> -<tr class="th"><th id="table1" colspan="3">TABLE NO. 1.</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th colspan="3">Sources of Pipes, and Relative Numbers Available for Examination.</th></tr> -<tr><td colspan="3" class="c">Total number of pipes inspected—4,451.</td></tr> -<tr class="th"><th class="l"><span class="u">Plate.</span> </th><th class="l"><span class="u">Source.</span> </th><th class="l"><span class="u">Number of Examples.</span></th></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig13">13</a> A. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig13">13</a> B. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">2</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig13">13</a> C. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">11</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig14">14</a> D. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">4</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig14">14</a> E. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig14">14</a> F. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig15">15</a> G. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig15">15</a> H. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">3</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig15">15</a> I. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig16">16</a> J. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig16">16</a> K. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig16">16</a> L. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig17">17</a> M. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">37</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig17">17</a> N. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig17">17</a> O. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig17">17</a> P. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig18">18</a> Q. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig18">18</a> R. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">10</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig18">18</a> S. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">Many</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig19">19</a> T. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">14</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig19">19</a> U. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">2</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig19">19</a> V. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig19">19</a> W. </td><td class="l">Surface </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig20">20</a> X. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig20">20</a> Y. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">2</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig20">20</a> Z. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">4</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig20">20</a> AA. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">4</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig21">21</a> AB. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig21">21</a> AC. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig21">21</a> AD. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig21">21</a> AE. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig22">22</a> AF. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">2</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig22">22</a> AG. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig22">22</a> AH. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig22">22</a> AI. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">2</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig23">23</a> AJ. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig23">23</a> AK. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig23">23</a> AL. </td><td class="l">Surface </td><td class="l">1</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig23">23</a> AM. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">2</td></tr> -</table> -<div class="pb" id="Page_15">15</div> -<table class="center"> -<tr class="th"><th id="table2" colspan="4">TABLE NO. 2</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th colspan="4">Identifications Appearing On Certain Pamplin Pipes.</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th class="l"><span class="u">Plate:</span> </th><th class="l"><span class="u">Source of Pipe.</span> </th><th class="l"><span class="u">Designation.</span> </th><th class="l"><span class="u">Lettering.</span></th></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig13">13</a> A. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">Original </td><td class="l">Impressed</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig13">13</a> B. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">Original </td><td class="l">Impressed</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig17">17</a> M. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">Original or Florence </td><td class="l">Impressed</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig18">18</a> Q. </td><td class="l">Both </td><td class="l">Hayiti </td><td class="l">Impressed</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig18">18</a> R. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">Genuine </td><td class="l">Impressed</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig19">19</a> V. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">117 </td><td class="l">Raised</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig20">20</a> Z. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">Catlins </td><td class="l">Raised</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig20">20</a> AA. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">103 </td><td class="l">Raised</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig21">21</a> AC. </td><td class="l">Home </td><td class="l">Original </td><td class="l">Impressed</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l"><a href="#fig21">21</a> AD. </td><td class="l">Factory </td><td class="l">Powhatan </td><td class="l">Impressed</td></tr> -</table> -<p><i><a href="#fig13">Plate 13</a> A.</i> Slightly Acute Angle. Made <i>both</i> in the factory and in the home. -Many examples. All are a deep, dark, glossy red, except 9 pipes which were a -light brown. Plain round bowl, octagonal base. It was made in at least 12 slightly -varying sizes, there being that many variations between the large and the -small pipe illustrated. This was the Pamplin Company’s “Original” Powhatan, -and it was no doubt one of the Company’s leaders in production and sales. The -word “ORIGINAL” is impressed in the right side of each base, with the exception -of one single pipe, and the lettering appears in at least three different sizes, -there being no correlation between the letter size and pipe size. This is a sturdily -made pipe.</p> -<p>The Company emphasized in its publicity that the Indians had originally -demonstrated to the early settlers the method of making the Powhatan and so -had enabled them to make this exact form, thereby inferring that this model -should have been of particular interest and worth. No doubt at some time and -place in our history a happening of this nature may have occurred. However, -the Powhatan is a usual form which has been found in aboriginal sites, with -some modifications and of varying materials, over a wide area.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_16">16</div> -<p>Many of these pipes appeared, both from the factory site and among those -made by local women and retrieved from the basement of the Thornton General -Store. Mrs. Betty Price said that this form was a standard product of the local -Home Industry pipe makers before the factory ever came to Pamplin and one of -the earliest made in the area. All of the pipes available to us carried the designation -“Original” except one.</p> -<p>The making of clay pipes was an old and well established business at Pamplin; -whether the impressing of the word ORIGINAL on the base of this pipe -was an innovation of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company, -or whether this had been long done by the Home Industry is unknown.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig31">Plate 13</a> B.</i> Slightly Acute Angle. Home. 2 examples. Dark red. Plain round -bowl, octagonal base. Quite similar to “A” except both bowl and base are shorter, -and diameter of bowl proportionally larger. “ORIGINAL” is impressed on -right side of base. A very sturdy pipe.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig13">Plate 13</a> C.</i> Slightly Acute Angle. Home. 11 examples. Glossy dark red. -Round bowl, octagonal base. Upper part of bowl plain, lower front portion decorated -with a series of raised dots. The dotted area is divided into two triangles, -as well as separated from the undecorated area by raised and rounded bands. The -mold marks in the undecorated area have been almost entirely smoothed. It -would seem that all pipes of this form came from the same mold, in contrast to -the fact that at least most other Pamplin pipe forms seem to have come from a -number of different molds.</p> -<p>The two pipe forms “C” and “B” are quite similar, except that “C” has -decoration as well as a slightly longer base, and is not marked “Original” Both -are sturdily built, with thicker than average bowl walls, and both were retrieved -from the Thornton Store site; no examples were found at the factory site. They -are probably the product of the same individual woman working at her home.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig14">Plate 14</a> D.</i> Slightly Acute Angle. Home. 4 examples. This is a black pipe. -The deep, solid color was probably intentionally achieved by allowing portions -of the burning wood of the kiln to fall into the iron kettles which were used -as saggers for the firing of pipes in the Home Industry. The bowl and base are -round, with diagonal cross-hatched decoration on bowl, separated from the same -decoration on remainder of base by a narrow rounded band. Flat band at both -top of bowl and end of base. The right and left halves of the pipe are separated -from each other, front and back, by a broad smooth ridge covering the mold -mark.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig14">Plate 14</a> E.</i> Slightly Acute Angle. Home. Many examples. Bright red. Bowl -and base decoration similar to “D”, but this form is somewhat smaller than -“D”. Double band at both top of bowl and end of base, the outside band broad -and flat, inside band narrow and rounded. Only slight variations in size.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig14">Plate 14</a> F.</i> Right Angle. Both. Many examples. Dull red. The Company -called this their “Akron Hamburg”. The diagonally cross-hatched bowl decoration -<span class="pb" id="Page_17">17</span> -is separated from the diagonal line base decoration by a rounded band. Double -band at both top of bowl and end of base, the outside band broad and flat, -the inside band narrow and rounded. The right and left halves of the pipe are -divided from each other, front and back, by a broad smooth ridge covering the -mold mark. Only slight variations in size.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig15">Plate 15</a> G.</i> Right Angle. Factory. Many examples. Dull red. Diagonal line -decoration on bowl runs at right angles to that on base. Double band at top of -bowl and stem end of base, outside band flat, inside band narrower and rounded. -The right and left halves of the pipe are divided from each other, front and -back, by a broad smooth ridge which covers the mold mark. Two slightly different -sizes.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig15">Plate 15</a> H.</i> Acute Angle. Home. 3 examples. Dull, dark red. Spiral decoration -on bowl, plain hexagonal base. Double band at top of bowl, upper flat, -lower rounded. Large rounded band at end of base.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig15">Plate 15</a> I.</i> Right Angle. Factory. Many examples. Dull, dark red; a few are -light brown. The Company called this model their “Ole Virginny Shaker”. -Grooves of decoration run vertically on bowl and curve toward the bottom to -stop at a rounded band, then continue horizontally to stem end of base. Double -band at top of bowl, upper flat, lower rounded. Double band at stem end of -base, inside band rounded; the outside band may be either rounded or flat; if flat, -the end of base is noticeably swelled. Five slightly varying sizes.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig16">Plate 16</a> J.</i> Sharply acute Angle. Factory. Many examples. Dark red. Broad -grooves of decoration run from top of bowl and curve toward bottom to continue -to stem end of base, or curve back around bowl. Double band at top of -bowl, upper flat, lower rounded. Prominent rounded swell at stem end of base. -At least 4 different sizes.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig16">Plate 16</a> K.</i> Acute Angle. Both. Many examples. Dull red to dark brown. -Quite similar to “J” in form and decoration except that lines of decoration are -more narrow and the bowl does not set at such an acute angle to base. Only -slight variations in size.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig16">Plate 16</a> L.</i> Obtuse Angle. Factory. Many examples. Dark red to brown. -Round undecorated bowl and round tapering base. These pipes are somewhat -similar to early stemmed clay imports except that the base is cut off rather short, -to form a flat vertical face, instead of terminating in a stem which was an integral -part of the bowl and base. The opening in the end of the base is quite small and -does not have the usual taper. All of the pipes of this form are nearly identical -in size.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig17">Plate 17</a> M.</i> Acute Angle. Both Home and Factory products, 37 examples. -Bright, light red. Plain round bowl, hexagonal base expanding to a bell-shaped -swell at stem end of base. The flat bottom extends around and under the bowl. -“ORIGINAL” is impressed in the right side of base of some examples and -“FLORENCE” in others, while some have no wording. The factory examples -that we saw were marked either “ORIGINAL” or “FLORENCE”, as were some -<span class="pb" id="Page_18">18</span> -of those of home manufacture; however, 16 pipes of home manufacture had no -wording. At least three sizes are represented.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig17">Plate 17</a> N.</i> Acute Angle. Factory. One Example. Dull, dark red. Similar to -“M” except heavy rounded band of beading around near top of bowl, no wording. -Hexagonal base expands to a bell-shaped swell at stem end. Mold marks -are more distinct.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig17">Plate 17</a> O.</i> Acute Angle. Factory. One example. Dull, dark red. Plain octagonal -bowl, with planes continuing along base to large rounded swell at stem -end. From deep in the dam at factory site.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig17">Plate 17</a> P.</i> Obtuse Angle. Both Home and Factory. Many examples. Dull, -dark red or brown. Octagonal bowl and base. No decoration. Base expands -slightly towards stem end. Relatively small pipe, three slightly varying sizes.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig18">Plate 18</a> Q.</i> Obtuse Angle. Both Home and Factory. Many examples. Glossy, -light red to deep red. Plain round bowl and base: the base terminates in rounded -and swelled end. “Hayiti” impressed on right side of base. At least three sizes -of lettering. A few of these pipes are right angled. A similar pipe, except that it -had one small rounded band of beading near the top of bowl, the Company -called theirs “Powow Smooth Shaker”.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig18">Plate 18</a> R.</i> Very Acute Angle. Home. 10 examples. Dark, glossy red. “Genuine” -is impressed on the right side of base, except one example which had no -lettering. Plain round bowl and base, terminating in rounded and swelled base -end. All apparently from same mold except one which was not marked “Genuine”.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig18">Plate 18</a> S.</i> Acute Angle. Both Home and Factory. Many examples. Glossy, -dark red. Plain hexagonal bowl which expands towards the bottom. Plain, slim -round base tapering towards stem end. These pipes usually carry a high glossy -finish. Two slightly different sizes.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig19">Plate 19</a> T.</i> Slightly Acute Angle. Home. Fourteen examples. Uniform light -tan color. Undecorated round bowl and base. Bowl tapers uniformly from top to -bottom and base expands uniformly to stem end. Two slightly varying sizes. No -mold marks, but some evidence of smoothing.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig19">Plate 19</a> U.</i> Right Angle. Home. Two examples. Uniform, light pinkish tan -color. Quite similar to “T” except bowl diameter is slightly larger and does not -have the extreme taper, but rounds towards the base. Two slightly varying sizes. -Probably made of the same clay by the same person who made “T”. No evidence -of mold marks, but some evidence of smoothing.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig19">Plate 19</a> V.</i> Acute Angle. Factory. One example. Dull red. Round bowl and -base. Two bands of rounded beading encircle mid-portion of bowl, base expands -towards stem end. “117” in raised figures appears on the left side of the base -near stem end.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig19">Plate 19</a> W.</i> Right Angle (A Surface find). One example. Dull red. Except -for its angle, this pipe is quite similar to “V” with its two bands of rounded -beading encircling the bowl.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_19">19</div> -<p><i><a href="#fig20">Plate 20</a> X.</i> Slightly Acute Angle. Factory. One example. Salmon pink color. -Ten-sided bowl and base. A rounded band of beading is near the top of bowl, -the base end is simply cut off flat.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig20">Plate 20</a> Y.</i> Acute Angle. Both Home and Factory. Two examples. The bowl is -decorated by narrow upright grooves and ridges which extend from the base up to -and lightly across a rounded band which encircles the bowl near its top. The -hexagonal base flares somewhat toward the stem end. This the Company called -“Wigwam Shaker”.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig20">Plate 20</a> Z.</i> Acute Angle. Factory. Four examples. Color ranges from pale -red to light orange, though two are very dark, probably from having lain long in -the stream bed. The round bowl is encircled by a band of rounded beading near -the top. Below this, on each side of the bowl, appears “CATLINS”. The base -is hexagonal and its planes merge into the lower portions of the round bowl. -The top plane of the base seems to be divided into two narrower planes which -give the base a seven-sided appearance; this however is probably due to lack of -trimming of the mold mark. The base terminates in a large rounded stem end. -This was probably a specialty pipe, and apparently all the pipes of this form had -these characteristics.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig20">Plate 20</a> AA.</i> Acute Angle. Factory. Four examples. Color ranges from pale -red to light orange to medium red. The 14 upright panels which constitute -the bowl, with its two encircling rounded bands near the top, give the effect of -a wooden bucket whose staves are held by hoops. The raised number “103” appears -on the flat bottom. In one example a metal ferrule, apparently of brass, is -still in place around the stem end of base. Other examples of this pipe no longer -retain the ferrule; however, the discolored pattern of the ferrule was present -to show that each had originally had one in place. All pipes of this form seem -identical and evidently came from the same mold.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig21">Plate 21</a> AB.</i> Right Angle. Factory. One example. Dark Red. Round undecorated -bowl and base. Stem end of base has an inside taper to hold a small reed -stem.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig21">Plate 21</a> AC.</i> Slight Obtuse Angle. Home. One example. Glossy, dark red. -Similar to “AB” except the angle of bowl and “ORIGINAL” is impressed on -the right side of the longer base.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig21">Plate 21</a> AD.</i> Obtuse Angle. Factory. One example. The plain bowl and -base have a uniform high glossy red finish. “POWHATAN” is impressed on -the right side of base. The stem end of base has been broken off, and it is possible -that this base terminated in a clay stem which was an integral part of the -pipe. In that event it would have followed the pattern of some of the old white -clay imports. There are no spurs or projections of any nature at the bottom of -the bowl.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig21">Plate 21</a> AE.</i> Probably Obtuse Angle. Factory. One example. Glossy medium -red. This is a form similar to some early white clay imports. While the only -<span class="pb" id="Page_20">20</span> -example available to us was badly broken, it seems to have its own integral clay -stem, and it definitely has one spur below the bowl.</p> -<p><i>Roll of Fired Clay.</i> A portion of a roll of fired clay was found in the fill on -the Factory site. It evidently had been prepared for molding, and some clay had -been broken from each end. It could have been a test firing of the clay, or the -piece may have unintentionally gotten into the kiln.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig22">Plate 22</a> AF.</i> Right Angle. Factory. Two examples. Colors are light orange -and red. A flat band encircles the top of the bowl, and below this is a more narrow -rounded band, whose lower edge is here and there lightly cut in line with -the grooves below. The vertical grooves of decoration on the bowl continue, or -merge with a lesser number of horizontal grooves and ridges which run to the -stem end of the base. These grooves, in part at least, extend over the large -rounded swell at stem end of base. These two pipes illustrate the minor differences -that may exist in different molds used in making the same basic pipe form.</p> -<p>This and the following three pipe forms seem to represent a transition from -the earlier, rather heavy, sturdy and relatively thick side-walled clay pipes, to a -pipe lighter in weight, which is more representative of the form in use by what -might be considered the last generation of regular clay pipe smokers.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig22">Plate 22</a> AG.</i> Acute Angle. Factory. One example. Color is gray. This piece was -among the eight pipe sherds, still sufficiently intact to give an indication of the -original pipe form from which they had come, that were picked up by us on the -driveway of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company in July -1969. Some were heavily glazed and of a different character from the pipes dealt -with up to this point, and seem to have come from pipes resulting from the -change in style mentioned under “AF”.</p> -<p>This pipe fragment has some characteristics similar to “AF”. The bowl decoration -towards the top is unknown, but vertical lines of decoration occupy the -bowl, and only those on the front of the bowl continue along the base; those -on the sides terminate upon joining the front lines. The stem end of the base -is also somewhat different, being decorated by a rounded and finally a flat band. -This sherd carries a moderately heavy glaze and it is the first pipe form presented -which actually shows evidence of a salt glaze.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig22">Plate 22</a> AH.</i> Right Angle. Factory. One example. Color pale yellow to -light brown. Round bowl and base, double rounded band of beading around top -of bowl and stem end of base. Bowl decorated with raised dots in cross-hatched -pattern. Spiral decoration on base. Prominent mold marks, thin sidewalls. Heavily -glazed.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig22">Plate 22</a> AI.</i> Right Angle. Factory. Two examples. Color ranges from deep -red through light orange to yellow. This lighter pipe with thin sidewalls has -two narrow rounded bands encircling the top of bowl, which is otherwise plain. -A large rounded band is at stem end of base. These pipes are well glazed.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig23">Plate 23</a> AJ.</i> Right Angle. Factory. One example. Dark Red. This is a version -of the Company’s novelty “Tomahawk Pipe”, decorated to order for special -<span class="pb" id="Page_21">21</span> -occasions. The pipe illustrated was made specifically for sale at the Chicago -World’s Fair and has “Century of Progress, Chicago” in raised letters on the left -side. “1833—(likeness of an Indian)—1933” is on the right side of bowl.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig23">Plate 23</a> AK.</i> Right Angle. Factory. One example. Color light tan. This was -the Company’s standard novelty pipe, recommended for all occasions, and it was -shaped like a tomahawk. A likeness of Washington appears on the right side of -the bowl, with the name “Washington” in raised letters above. On the left side -is the likeness of an Indian wearing a Plains headdress, and above it in raised -letters is the name “Powhatan”. A wide flat band encircles the stem end of base.</p> -<p>The Pamplin Company’s literature stated, <i>Tomahawk Pipe-Novelty, molded -from hand engraved brass die, of finest clay, hard-burned and glazed. An attractive -item for carnivals, conventions, fairs, etc. Packed 200 to a box with 5″ reed stems. Price -$13.50 per box.</i> This pipe was a regular sales item for festive occasions (<a href="#fig11">Plate 11</a>).</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig23">Plate 23</a> AL.</i> Right Angle. (A surface find). One example. Deep red. Most -Pamplin pipes of home manufacture were made by women; however, Miss Wilsie -Thornton and Dr. C. G. O’Brien said that a Mr. Rodgers, about 1938, made -pipe molds and pipes of unusual form as a hobby. Miss Thornton mentioned -two forms that he made—an Indian Head, and a Woman’s Leg, the calf being -the bowl and the foot being the base, with the toes at the stem end of base. -This pipe is credited locally as being of his manufacture.</p> -<p><i><a href="#fig23">Plate 23</a> AM.</i> Right Angle. Home. Two examples. Deep glossy red. The -decoration on the lower portion of the round and expanding bowl reminds one -somewhat of a peach seed; this decoration is separated from the upper part of -the plain upper bowl by a rounded band. The base is undecorated, and terminates -in a smooth enlarged stem end. The second pipe of this form was a surface -find.</p> -<p>If the Factory had Nos. 103 and 117 how many more numbers may they -have had?</p> -<p>Impressed identifications, usually put on the base of the pipe with a stamp -after the pipe came from the mold, appear on pipes from both the Homes and -from the Factory. It is of interest that apparently identifications in raised lettering -came only from the Factory.</p> -<h3 id="c13">CONCLUSIONS</h3> -<p>In the beginning of this effort we had assumed that the pipes made by the -Factory would be quite different, in both form and decoration, from those made -in the homes. We have found that this assumption is not valid.</p> -<p>There is a great deal of overlapping, probably due to the Factory, after its -arrival in Pamplin, taking over and producing a number of the shapes and designs -that had long been in use in the Home Industry. It is also possible that -the Home Industry appropriated some of the Factory pipe forms.</p> -<p>In addition, all local evidence agrees that the Thornton Store did not purchase -<span class="pb" id="Page_22">22</span> -pipes from the Factory; they were getting plenty themselves, taken in trade -for their merchandise, and which they would have to dispose of on the wholesale -market in competition with the Factory.</p> -<p>There is local evidence that the Factory did, at times, buy locally made pipes -in order to fill large orders, as well as when their machinery was not in operation. -It is quite unlikely however, after buying and paying for them, that these -pipes would be found in the landfill on the Factory grounds, the fill from which -the “factory” pipes considered in this study came.</p> -<p>Of the total of 39 pipe forms located by us, 10 were from Home Industry, -19 from the Factory, (eight appeared in both), and two were either surface finds -or the knowledge of their exact place of manufacture lost, as they had long -been in the hands of their local Pamplin area owners.</p> -<p>The Akron Company had made pipes before they established the pipe plant -at Pamplin, and the names of some of their pipes in the Pamplin literature -would infer that at least one form, the “Akron Hamburg”, had been carried -from Akron to Pamplin, which then is described as “from Virginia clay, attractive -red color”.</p> -<p>On the other hand, Mrs. Betty Price has been quoted as saying that the -pipe form known as “Hamburg” was one of the first made by the women of the -area.</p> -<p>For a time in later years, at least by 1941, the Pamplin Factory made a pipe -similar in form and decoration to their “Akron Hamburg”, but of fire clay, and -called it “Akron Shaker”.</p> -<p>Since there is so much overlapping of form and decoration between the -pipes made in the homes and those made by the Company, one wonders if there -might not have been even more overlapping had the sample available to us at -this late date been greater than the 4,451 pipes examined.</p> -<p>It is our conclusion that when the Akron Company came to Pamplin they -started to produce pipes of a number of forms that had long been made by the -Home Industry of the Pamplin area. They may also have brought one or more -Akron pipe forms and decorations with them, to be manufactured at Pamplin. -In turn the Pamplin Home Industry possibly adopted some forms now being -produced by the Company. (Some of these forms may also have been in production -in other areas, but probably of different clay).</p> -<p>The foremost factor distinguishing Pamplin area pipes, from either manufacturing -source, was the “Virginia clay, of attractive red color”.</p> -<p>So far as we have been able to determine, no particular friction ever developed -between the Factory and the industry being carried on at the homes; each -had its own wholesale outlets.</p> -<p>To the best of our knowledge, the Home Industry started about 1740 and -definitely closed in 1953.</p> -<p>The Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company was established -about 1878, and it definitely closed in 1951.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_23">23</div> -<p>In our work we have handled literally hundreds of the pipes, <a href="#fig13">Plate 13</a> A, -called “Powhatan Original” in the Company’s literature and advertising. These -had been excavated both from the factory grounds and from the basement of the -old Thornton Store, and we found nothing about these two lots of pipes that -would seem to distinguish the two manufacturing sources. Of the total, only -one single pipe failed to carry the word “Original” impressed in the base.</p> -<p>This “Original” was an early Home Industry form, and there is strong evidence -that when the Company came to Pamplin they adopted this form, and -added “Powhatan” in their advertising, just as they must have adopted some -other local pipe forms. “Original” was also impressed, but probably at a still -later date, on the base of three other pipe forms; they were forms “B”, “M”, -and “AC”.</p> -<p>We also believe that the Company made the best estimate as to the starting -date of the home pipemaking industry, (they would have had about a hundred -year advantage in arriving at such a date, as compared to the problem under -present circumstances), and applied that date to Pamplin Smoking Pipe and -Manufacturing Company as having been “established 1739”. In other words, they -pictured themselves as being a continuation of the industry that was already -there.</p> -<p>If the date of 1878, or one near that time, for the establishment of the Pamplin -Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Co. is correct, then this is later than the -terminal date of some of the western forts and trading posts at which Pamplin -pipes have been reported. It would therefore seem evident that the Pamplin -pipes found in some western locations were the result of Home Industry, made -before the pipe plant ever got to Pamplin. This is authenticated by the fact that -they were being carried by the <i>Bertrand</i>.</p> -<p>It would seem desirable, instead of considering these pipes as Pamplin Company -products, to simply think of them as Pamplin Area Pipes.</p> -<h3 id="c14">BIBLIOGRAPHY</h3> -<dl class="undent"><dt>BLAIR, C. DEAN</dt> -<dd class="t">1965 <i>The Potters and Potteries of Summit County, 1828-1915</i> The Summit County Historical Society, Akron, Ohio.</dd> -<dt>BRADSHAW, HERBERT C.</dt> -<dd class="t">1955 <i>History of Prince Edward County, Virginia</i> Dietz Press, Inc. Richmond.</dd> -<dt>COTTER, JOHN L.</dt> -<dd class="t">1958 <i>Archaeological Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia</i> Archaeological Research Series No. 4, National Park Service, Washington.</dd> -<dt>COTTER, JOHN L. AND J. PAUL HUDSON</dt> -<dd class="t">1957 <i>New Discoveries at Jamestown</i> National Park Service, Washington.</dd> -<dt>CRESTHULL, PAUL</dt> -<dd class="t">1969 “Styles of Detachable Stem Pipes” <i>Maryland Archaeology</i> V:2.</dd> -<dt class="pb" id="Page_24">24</dt> -<dt>EWERS, JOHN C.</dt> -<dd class="t">1969 Personal Communication January 27, 1969.</dd> -<dd class="t">1972 Personal Communication January 19, 1972.</dd> -<dt>FEATHERSTONE, NATHANIEL R.</dt> -<dd class="t">1948 <i>The History of Appomattox County, Virginia.</i> Appomattox American Legion Post 104, Appomattox.</dd> -<dt>FONTANA, BERNARD L., AND J. CAMERON GREENLEAF</dt> -<dd class="t">1962 <i>Johnny Ward’s Ranch</i> The Kiva, 28:1-2, Tucson.</dd> -<dt>HEITE, EDWARD F.</dt> -<dd class="t">1969 “Pipe Industry History Reflected in Tools” <i>Quarterly Bulletin</i>, Archaeological Society of Virginia 24:2, 118-119.</dd> -<dd class="t">1971 “Pipes from the Pamplin Factory in Appomattox County Virginia” <i>Quarterly Bulletin</i>, Archaeological Society of Virginia 25:3, 195-196.</dd> -<dt>MARTIN, JOSEPH</dt> -<dd class="t">1835 <i>Gazetteer of Virginia</i> published by Joseph Martin, Charlottesville.</dd> -<dt>MILLER, CARL F.</dt> -<dd class="t">1960 “Excavation And Investigations of Fort Lookout Trading Post II in the Fort Randall Reservoir, South Dakota” <i>River Basin Surveys Papers No. 17</i>, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin No. 176, Nos. 15-20 pp. 49-82.</dd> -<dt>OMWAKE, H. GEIGER</dt> -<dd class="t">1967 “Supplemental Report on Additional White Clay Pipe Evidence Recovered from the Buck Site Near Chestertown, Maryland” <i>Bulletin Archaeological Society of Delaware</i> Nos. 5 and 6, New Series, Fall 1967: 23-30.</dd> -<dt>PRUCHA, FRANCIS PAUL</dt> -<dd class="t">1964 <i>Guide to the Military Posts of the U.S.</i> State Historical Society of Wisconsin. 1964.</dd> -<dt>SACKET, RICHARD</dt> -<dd class="t">1943 “Historical Clay Pipes of the Minnesota Area”. <i>Minnesota Archaeologist</i> 9:3, 69-82. Minneapolis.</dd> -<dt>SMITH, G. HUBERT</dt> -<dd class="t">1960a. “Fort Pierre II, an Historic Trading Post in the Oahe Dam Area, South Dakota”. <i>River Basin Surveys Papers No. 18</i> Bureau American Ethnology, Bulletin 176, Nos. 15-20: 83-158.</dd> -<dd class="t">1960b. “Investigations at Fort Stevenson” <i>River Basin Surveys Papers No. 19</i>, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 176, Nos. 15-20: 159-238.</dd> -<dt>THOMPSON, ERWIN T.</dt> -<dd class="t">1965 Communication to John W. Walker, Jan. 8, 1965.</dd> -<dt>THOMPSON, WILLIAM A., JR.</dt> -<dd class="t">1969 “Pamplin Pipes” <i>The Chesopiean</i> 7:1.</dd> -<dt class="pb" id="Page_25">25</dt> -<dt>WALKER, JOHN W.</dt> -<dd class="t">1962 Field Notes, on Pamplin Pipes, while engaged in Archaeological Research Appomattox Courthouse.</dd> -<dt>WILSON, REX L.</dt> -<dd class="t">1961 “Clay Pipes from Fort Laramie” <i>Annals of Wyoming</i>, 33:2, 120-134 Cheyenne.</dd> -<dd class="t">1966 “Tobacco Pipes from Fort Union, New Mexico” <i>El Palacio</i>, 73: 1, 32-40. Santa Fe.</dd> -<dd class="t">1971 <i>Clay Tobacco Pipes from Fort Laramie, National Historic Site and Related Locations.</i> Division of Archaeology and Anthropology, National Park Service, Washington.</dd> -<dt>WOODLING, R. H.</dt> -<dd class="t">1969 Communication to Charles H. Meadows, Appomattox National Historic Park, May 15, 1969</dd> -<dt>WOOLWORTH, ALLAN R. AND W. RAYMOND WOOD</dt> -<dd class="t">1960 “Archaeology at Kipp’s Post” <i>River Basin Surveys Papers No. 20</i>, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 176: 239-321. Washington.</dd></dl> -<h3>Newspapers</h3> -<table class="center"> -<tr><td class="c">1935 </td><td class="l"><i>Farmville Herald</i>, Farmville, Va. Mar. 29, 1935 “Pamplin Pipe Factory”</td></tr> -<tr><td class="c">1946 </td><td class="l"><i>Times-Dispatch</i>, Richmond, Va. April 21, 1946 “Indian Pipes are Still Produced from Clay Found in Virginia”.</td></tr> -<tr><td class="c">1965 </td><td class="l"><i>Times-Dispatch</i>, Richmond, Va. March 31, 1965 “Pamplin Pipes in Smithsonian”.</td></tr> -<tr><td class="c"><span class="hst">?</span> </td><td class="l"><i>Times-Dispatch</i>, Richmond, Va. March 30 ? “Historic Pipes Shipped West From Virginia”.</td></tr> -<tr><td class="c">1962 </td><td class="l"><i>Times-Virginian</i>, Appomattox, Va. “Ramblings About Clay Pipes” Oct. 18, ’62</td></tr> -</table> -<div class="pb" id="Page_26">26</div> -<div class="img" id="fig1"> -<img src="images/p01.jpg" alt="" width="586" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 1. Tools of the Home Pipemaking Industry. Drawing, Edward -F. Heite, Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission.</p> -</div> -<dl class="undent pcap"><dt>PIPEMAKER’S TOOLS FROM APPOMATTOX COUNTY, VIRGINIA</dt> -<dt><span class="smaller">COMPOSITE DRAWING DERIVED FROM SPECIMENS OWNED BY DR. C. G. O’BRIEN</span></dt> -<dt>VIRGINIA HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION ARCHÆOLOGY OFFICE</dt> -<dt>1 MOLD CLOSED</dt> -<dd class="t">TOP VIEW</dd> -<dt>2 MOLD CLOSED</dt> -<dd class="t">EDGE VIEW</dd> -<dt>3 MOLD OPEN, TO SHOW WORKINGS</dt> -<dt>4 KNIFE</dt> -<dt>5 STEM TOOL</dt> -<dt>6 BOWL TOOL</dt></dl> -<div class="pb" id="Page_27">27</div> -<div class="img" id="fig2"> -<img src="images/p01b.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="480" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 2. Pamplin Pipe, from the Bertrand, sunk in the Missouri River, -April 1, 1865. Photos, Ronald R. Switzer, Bertrand Conservation -Laboratory, National Park Service.</p> -</div> -<div class="img" id="fig3"> -<img src="images/p01c.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="362" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 3. Stencils on Box of Pamplin Pipes retrieved from the Bertrand. -The box top carried the name and address of the Consignee. -One end evidently identified the shipment. The Consignor -was identified on one end and on both sides of the box. Copies, -Ronald R. Switzer, Bertrand Conservation Laboratory, -National Park Service.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_28">28</div> -<div class="img" id="fig4"> -<img src="images/p02.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="543" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 4. The Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company, Inc., -March 1965. Photo, Richmond Times-Dispatch.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_29">29</div> -<div class="img" id="fig5"> -<img src="images/p02a.jpg" alt="" width="615" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 5. Kiln of the Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Company, -Inc., March 1965. The kiln had a capacity of 200,000 -pipes at a single burning. Photo, Richmond Times-Dispatch.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_30">30</div> -<div class="img" id="fig6"> -<p class="pcap">Plate 6. Pipe Molding Machine from the Pamplin Factory. Photos, Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission.</p> -</div> -<div class="img" id="imgx1"> -<img src="images/p03.jpg" alt="" width="746" height="652" /> -<p class="pcap">The machine.</p> -</div> -<div class="img" id="imgx2"> -<img src="images/p03a.jpg" alt="" width="746" height="527" /> -<p class="pcap">Detail of mold.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_31">31</div> -<div class="img" id="fig7"> -<img src="images/p03b.jpg" alt="" width="430" height="801" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 7. Saggers Used by the Pamplin Factory. Dimensions of the -larger sagger,—overall height 6″, overall width, 10¼ to 10½″, -wall thickness ⅞ to 1″. Dark Brown glaze, mottled. Photos -and description, Edward A Chappell, Virginia Historic Landmarks -Commission.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_32">32</div> -<div class="img" id="fig8"> -<img src="images/p04.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="677" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 8. Brochure, Pamplin Smoking Pipe and Manufacturing Co., Inc., -1941. Copy, Morton L. Wallerstein.</p> -</div> -<div class="box"> -<p><b>This is the largest plant in the world devoted exclusively -to the manufacture of Indian stone clay pipes.</b> -Our plant has a capacity of 25,000 pipes per day; our -kiln has a capacity of 200,000 pipes at a single burning.</p> -<p>From careful search of the records, this factory -started more than 200 years ago. The present plant -has been in operation for 44 years. Skilled American -labor is used in a modern, day-lit plant with special -attention to cleanliness, sanitation and ideal -conditions.</p> -<p>The buying trend is toward Indian clay and stone -pipes. Tourists and visitors to your locality are buying -them as gifts, souvenirs and for personal use. Every -true American wants a genuine Indian pipe—and can -buy one, for little more than the cost of a can of smoking -tobacco.</p> -<p>Order your assortment today. Display them well -and they will sell quickly. Pamplin Indian Pipes give -you a profit unheard of in the tobacco trade.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss"><span class="large">PAMPLIN SMOKING PIPE AND MANUFACTURING CO., Inc.</span> -<br /><span class="smaller">Established 1739</span> -<br />Manufacturers of All Styles of -<br />Stone and Powhatan Clay Pipes and Reed Stems -<br />PAMPLIN, VIRGINIA, U. S. A.</span></p> -<p>Printed in U. S. A.</p> -</div> -<div class="box"> -<p class="center"><span class="large"><span class="ss">Hand-Made “Powhatan”</span></span></p> -<p class="center"><span class="larger"><i><span class="cur">Powhatan</span></i></span> -<br /><span class="larger"><span class="ss">INDIAN CLAY PIPES</span></span></p> -<div class="verse"> -<p class="t0"><span class="u">MILD</span></p> -<p class="t0"><span class="u"><i>mellow</i></span></p> -<p class="t0"><span class="u">SWEET</span></p> -<p class="t0"><span class="u">PURE</span></p> -<p class="lr"><i>50¢</i> WITH <i>Two</i> STEMS</p> -</div> -<p class="center"><i class="cur">Be A Modern Indian Chief! -<br />Smoke the Genuine -<br /><span class="larger">“Powhatan” pipe</span></i> -<br /><span class="ssn"><span class="smaller">MADE IN VIRGINIA BY NATIVES OF VIRGINIA</span></span></p> -<p>This handsome display card, in five colors, given -with each order for five dozen “Powhatan” Hand-Made -Pipes, makes selling easy. Order yours.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_33">33</div> -<div class="img" id="fig9"> -<img src="images/p04a.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="451" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 9. The “Original” Powhatan and other Pamplin Pipe forms. -Brochure, 1941. Copy, Morton L. Wallenstein.</p> -</div> -<p class="center"><span class="ss"><span class="larger"><span class="u">The POWHATAN, the original Indian hand-made Pipe, sells on sight, pays Big Profit!</span></span></span></p> -<div class="box"> -<p class="center"><span class="ssn">“POWOW” SMOOTH SHAKER</span> -<br /><span class="ssn">“WIGWAM” SHAKER</span> -<br /><span class="ssn">ORIGINAL “POWHATAN” HAND-MADE</span> -<br /><span class="ssn">“AKRON” SHAKER</span> -<br /><span class="ssn">“OLE VIRGINNY” SHAKER</span></p> -<p>THESE ARE THE MOST POPULAR STYLES OF PAMPLIN INDIAN PIPES -All (except “Powhatan”) are available in both Shaker (Stone) and Hamburg (Clay).</p> -<hr class="dwide" /> -<p class="center"><span class="ss"><span class="large">The Original Powhatan Pipe</span></span></p> -<p>The original Powhatan Indian hand-made Pipe has the distinction of -being the exact reproduction of the real pipe made and smoked by the Red -Men in pre-colonial days.</p> -<p>Pipe smoking was introduced into England by Sir Walter Raleigh -who had seen the Indians smoking. With the start of tobacco cultivation -in Virginia, the Powhatan Pipe became generally used in England and in -all of the American colonies.</p> -<p>A host of that day took great pride in offering his guests tobacco -grown on his own plantation, in a Powhatan Indian hand-made Pipe.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss"><span class="large">An Authentic American Treasure</span></span></p> -<p>The natives who have been making Powhatan Pipes for centuries are -rapidly disappearing. Their children seem unwilling to do the necessary -primitive and tedious work. Manual clay pipe-making, probably America’s -oldest industry, will soon be only a tradition.</p> -<p>Today the Powhatan Pipe is more than a source of peaceful, contented -smoking enjoyment. It is a collector’s prize, an authentic American -treasure. In a few years it will be generally unobtainable.</p> -<p>This company is the world’s sole producer of genuine Indian pipes. -Since 1739 it has preserved this historic industry. Its clay deposit in -Appomattox County, Virginia, holds the only clay discovered as ideal for -Indian pipes. The trade-mark and name, “Original Powhatan Indian -Pipe,” is its exclusive property.</p> -<p>Yet the famous Powhatan Pipe is very low in price, as for many -years past, giving the consumer a splendid value, and the jobber and retailer -a profit unheard of in the tobacco trade.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_34">34</div> -<div class="img" id="fig10"> -<img src="images/p05.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="462" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 10. Price list of Pamplin Company Pipe Forms. Brochure, November -15, 1941. Copy, Morton L. Wallenstein.</p> -</div> -<div class="box"> -<p class="center"><span class="larger"><span class="ss">PRICE LIST</span></span> -<br /><b>(EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 15, 1941) -<br />[<i>See Page 6 for Jobber’s Discounts</i>]</b></p> -<hr /> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">POWHATAN HAND-MADE PIPES</span></p> -<p>Individually packaged in attractive rustic container, -Historical Booklet, instruction tag, and two -10″ reed stems—one curved, one straight, ready -for mailing.</p> -<p class="center"><b>Gross</b> <span class="hst"><b>$48.00</b></span> -<br /><span class="small">Minimum order ¼ Gross</span> -<br /><i><b>Retails for from 50¢ to $1.00</b></i></p> -<p class="center"><span class="large"><span class="ss">Buy Pipes Made in America—For American Smokers!</span></span></p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">POWHATAN COUNTER DISPLAY</span></p> -<p>Twelve Powhatan Pipes, each with Historical -Booklet, instruction tag, and extra 10″ straight -stem included.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="small">DOZEN TO DISPLAY CARD</span> -<br /><b>Gross</b> <span class="hst"><b>$48.00</b></span> -<br /><span class="small">Minimum order ¼ Gross.</span></p> -<p class="center">(<i>Display card illustrated on Page 3 of this Catalog.</i>)</p> -<p class="jr1">Page 10</p> -<hr class="dwide" /> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Powhatan Machine-Made</span></p> -<p>Machine-made Powhatan, fitted with cork closures -and 10″ reed stems, bowls trade-marked. Packed 50 -to the box with stems. 25¢ Retailer. Price, $4.00 per box.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Akron Shaker</span></p> -<p>Machine moulded from fire clay, hard-burned and -glazed; a stone pipe fitted with 5″ reed stem. Packed -100 to a box with stems. 15¢ Retailer. Price, $3.00 per box.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Powow Shaker</span></p> -<p>Stone pipe, smooth finish, glazed, fitted with 5″ reed -stem. Packed 100 to a box with stems. 15¢ Retailer. -Price, $3.00 per box.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Ole Virginny Shaker</span></p> -<p>Heavier stone pipe, attractive finish, fitted with 5″ -reed stem. Packed 100 to box with stems. 15¢ Retailer. -Price, $3.00 per box.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Wigwam Shaker.</span></p> -<p>Real character distinguishes this attractive stone -pipe, fitted with 5″ reed stem. Packed 100 to box with -stems. 15¢ Retailer. Price, $3.00 per box.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Shaker Assortment.</span></p> -<p>An assortment of 25 each of the four above described -stone pipes, 100 pipes, fitted with 5″ reed stem. Packed -100 to box. 15¢ Retailer. Price, $3.50 per box.</p> -<hr /> -<p>Stems can be furnished straight or bent. -Additional Stems and Stems Extra Length -Can Be Supplied at Slight Extra Cost.</p> -<p class="center"><i>Send Money Order or Check with Order to Save Time.</i></p> -<hr /> -<p class="center">Terms: 20% Cash With Order. Net 30 Days.</p> -<p class="jr1">Page 11</p> -<hr class="dwide" /> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Akron Hamburg</span> -<br /><span class="small">(<i>Similar to Akron Shaker</i>)</span></p> -<p>Machine-made from Virginia Clay, hard-burned, -attractive red color. Also made in white. Packed 100 -to box with 5″ reed stems. 10¢ Retailer. Price, $2.50 -per box.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Powow Hamburg</span> -<br /><span class="small">(<i>Similar to Powow Shaker</i>)</span></p> -<p>Machine-made from Virginia Clay, hard-burned, -an attractive small bowl. Packed 100 to box with 5″ -reed stems. 10¢ Retailer. Price, $2.50 per box.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Ole Virginny Hamburg</span> -<br /><span class="small">(<i>Similar to Ole Virginny Shaker</i>)</span></p> -<p>Machine-made from finest fire-clay, hard-burned, -white, simulates meerschaum, one of the most popular -shapes. Also made in red. Packed 100 to box with 5″ -reed stems. 10¢ Retailer. Price, $2.70 per box.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Wigwam Hamburg</span> -<br /><span class="small">(<i>Similar to Wigwam Shaker</i>)</span></p> -<p>Machine-made from Virginia Clay, hard-burned. -Choice of red or white. Shape appeals to young and -old. Packed 100 to box with 5″ reed stems. 10¢ Retailer. -Price, $2.70 per box.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ss">Hamburg Assortment</span></p> -<p>An assortment of 25 each of the four above described -clay pipes, 100 pipes, fitted with 5″ reed stems. Packed -100 to box with stems. 15¢ Retailer. Price, $2.85 per box.</p> -<hr /> -<p>Stems can be furnished straight or bent. -Additional Stems and Stems Extra Length -Can Be Supplied at Slight Extra Cost.</p> -<p class="center"><i>Send Money Order or Check with Order to Save Time.</i></p> -<p class="center">Terms: 20% Cash With Order. Net 30 Days.</p> -<p class="jr1">Page 12</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_35">35</div> -<div class="img" id="fig11"> -<img src="images/p05a.jpg" alt="" width="696" height="600" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 11. “Tomahawk Pipe”—A Real Novelty, and Jobber’s Discounts. -Brochure, 1941. Copy, Morton L. Wallerstein.</p> -</div> -<div class="box"> -<p class="center"><span class="larger"><span class="ss">The Tomahawk Pipe—A Real Novelty</span></span></p> -<p>Moulded from hand-engraved brass die, of finest quality fire clay, hard-burned -and glazed. An attractive item for carnivals, conventions, fairs, club meetings, etc. -Packed 200 to box, with 5″ reed stems. Price, <b>$13.50 per box</b>.</p> -<hr /> -<p class="center"><span class="larger"><span class="ss">To the Trade</span></span></p> -<table class="center"> -<tr class="th"><th colspan="2"><span class="ss">JOBBER’S DISCOUNTS</span></th></tr> -<tr><td colspan="2" class="c">Apply ONLY When Whole Order Is Shipped At SAME Time</td></tr> -<tr><td class="r">10 to 20 Boxes </td><td class="l">20%</td></tr> -<tr><td class="r">21 to 40 Boxes </td><td class="l">25%</td></tr> -<tr><td class="r">41 to 100 Boxes </td><td class="l">30%</td></tr> -<tr><td class="r">101 to 500 Boxes </td><td class="l">35%</td></tr> -</table> -<p>In addition to the 10 styles of Indian Pipes -illustrated and quoted in this folder, we make -many other styles of Indian Clay and Stone Pipes. -Orders for additional designs—for Advertising, -Souvenirs, Gifts, Tourists, Fairs, Exhibitions, and -Special Purposes—are solicited. We can make -any style of pipe that can be made from either -Virginia Red Clay or Fire Clay. Our own designers -and artists are at your service. <i>We invite -your inquiries.</i> Samples will be mailed promptly -to rated firms.</p> -<p>(<span class="sc">Note</span>: If you have a friend to whom you would -like for us to send one of these folders, please write. -It will be sent promptly.)</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_36">36</div> -<div class="img" id="fig12"> -<img src="images/p06.jpg" alt="" width="659" height="600" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 12. Sales Tag, carried by the “Original” Powhatan Pipe, 1941. -Copy, Morton L. Wallerstein.</p> -</div> -<div class="box"> -<p class="center"><span class="larger"><i><span class="cur">This Is An -<br />“Original” -<br />Powhatan Pipe</span></i></span></p> -<hr /> -<p>Made entirely by hand in a primitive -way, from hand-carved moulds several -centuries old, by natives in -Appomattox County, Va. Succeeding -generations, dating back to the -earliest days of America, have -practiced the ancient art of making -these Indian pipes by hand. The -slow, tedious work, requiring innate -skill, is not attractive to the moderns. -This art is rapidly disappearing. -Soon the genuine Powhatan Pipe -will be generally unobtainable. This -Pipe, therefore, will become a rare -and cherished antique and keepsake.</p> -<p>This Powhatan Pipe is an original, -made exactly like those the Indians -used prior to the coming of the white -man to America, and as smoked in -the early colonies and in England -following Sir Walter Raleigh’s introduction -of tobacco into that -country. The clay is porous and the -old Virginia reed stem also absorbs -the nicotine. To clean the pipe according -to the old Virginia method, -remove the stem and place the bowl -into the fire-place. This will burn -out the absorbed nicotine without -in any way harming the pipe. New -stems may be obtained from your -tobacconist.</p> -<p class="center"><span class="ssn">PAMPLIN INDIAN PIPE CO., -<br />Pamplin, Va., U. S. A.</span></p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_37">37</div> -<div class="img" id="fig13"> -<img src="images/p06a.jpg" alt="" width="606" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 13. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_38">38</div> -<div class="img" id="fig14"> -<img src="images/p07.jpg" alt="" width="569" height="787" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 14. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_39">39</div> -<div class="img" id="fig15"> -<img src="images/p07a.jpg" alt="" width="575" height="767" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 15. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_40">40</div> -<div class="img" id="fig16"> -<img src="images/p08.jpg" alt="" width="627" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 16. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_41">41</div> -<div class="img" id="fig17"> -<img src="images/p08a.jpg" alt="" width="591" height="757" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 17. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_42">42</div> -<div class="img" id="fig18"> -<img src="images/p09.jpg" alt="" width="624" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 18. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_43">43</div> -<div class="img" id="fig19"> -<img src="images/p09a.jpg" alt="" width="545" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 19. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_44">44</div> -<div class="img" id="fig20"> -<img src="images/p10.jpg" alt="" width="577" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 20. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_45">45</div> -<div class="img" id="fig21"> -<img src="images/p10a.jpg" alt="" width="421" height="734" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 21. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_46">46</div> -<div class="img" id="fig22"> -<img src="images/p11.jpg" alt="" width="503" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 22. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_47">47</div> -<div class="img" id="fig23"> -<img src="images/p11a.jpg" alt="" width="618" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Plate 23. Pamplin Area Pipe Forms.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_48">48</div> -<h2 id="c15"><span class="small">THE UTLAUT SITE (23SA162W): AN ONEOTA-HISTORIC MISSOURI BURIAL SITE</span></h2> -<p class="center">by -<br />Patricia J. O’Brien and Kevin Hart</p> -<p>The Utlaut site (23SA162W) is located on the floodplain of the Missouri -River about one mile west of Malta Bend, Saline County, Missouri and approximately -two miles northwest of the junction of Highway 65 and 127.</p> -<p>The site is situated on land owned by Oscar John of Sweet Springs, Missouri -and was farmed by Ryland Utlaut of Grand Pass. Both kindly allowed us -to excavate there. We were directed to the site by J. M. “Buster” Crick of Corder, -Missouri, a local collector who had been finding ceramics which looked -“Mississippian.” His aid was invaluable, for without it this work could not have -been done.</p> -<p>Scattered occupational debris was found covering an area ca. 100 feet in -diameter around our test, but the major materials recovered, in six burials, seem -not to be related to the surface debris. Those materials will be reported in a -later paper dealing with site 23SA162, the Cole Lake Sand Ridge site.</p> -<p>As mentioned, the Utlaut site is situated on the floodplain of the river. The -area, though, is in reality an old beach of the Missouri, formed when the river -swung south of its present course and came near Grand Pass. Because the soil -was almost pure sand, all of it was screened.</p> -<p>The initial test was an east-west trench comprising five alternating squares -(<a href="#fig25">Fig. 2</a>). Burial materials were found between stakes 35W and 55W north and -south of the 0 line (<a href="#fig25">Fig. 2</a>). Remains of five burials were recovered. While a -few bones were treated as a separate burial in the field (Burial 5), they were found -to be related to Burial 2 on completion of the analysis. The bones in burials 1 -through 5 were in very poor condition, and because of cultivation many are -missing.</p> -<h3 id="c16">BURIAL DESCRIPTIONS</h3> -<p>The osteological analysis of the skeletal remains found in <a href="#c19">Appendix I</a> is by -the junior author and Clark Larsen. The descriptions to follow will focus on the -cultural nature of the burials.</p> -<p><i>Burial 1.</i> This is an adult male. The body was extended and oriented on a -northeast-southwest axis with the head northeast. Although a vessel was found -in the same square as the burial, it is thought that it belongs to Burial 4. One -projectile point was found just east of the neck. Due north by about one foot -was a biface chopper/scraper. These artifacts may be associated with this burial -(Figs. <a href="#fig25">2</a> and <a href="#fig26">3</a>).</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_49">49</div> -<div class="img" id="fig24"> -<img src="images/p12.jpg" alt="" width="553" height="797" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 1. Floodplain of the Missouri River with locations of 23SA4 -Gumbo Point site, 23SA162W Utlaut site, and 23SA162 -Cole Lake Sand Ridge site.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_50">50</div> -<div class="img" id="fig25"> -<img src="images/p13.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="671" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 2. Test excavations at the Utlaut site, 23SA162W, with Detail -“A” showing the burials.</p> -</div> -<dl class="undent pcap"><dt><i>BURIAL 6</i></dt> -<dd><i>Pot</i></dd> -<dt><i>BURIAL 2</i></dt> -<dd><i>Child’s skull</i></dd> -<dd><i>Pot</i></dd> -<dd><i>Shell Spoon</i></dd> -<dt><i>BURIAL 3</i></dt> -<dd><i>Scraper</i></dd> -<dt><i>BURIAL 4</i></dt> -<dd><i>Pot</i></dd> -<dd><i>Biface</i></dd> -<dt><i>BURIAL</i></dt> -<dd><i>Projectile point</i></dd> -<dd><i>Bundled bones</i></dd></dl> -<div class="pb" id="Page_51">51</div> -<div class="img" id="fig26"> -<img src="images/p13a.jpg" alt="" width="532" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 3. Burial 1, 23SA162W. View is toward northeast.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_52">52</div> -<p>The projectile point is triangular, of tan-cream chert and is 3.1 cm. long, -1.44 cm. wide and 0.25 cm. thick (<a href="#fig27">Fig. 4</a>a). It is a typical Mississippian/Oneota -point. The biface was cream colored with cortex present. There is a scraper edge -on the long axis on one side (<a href="#fig27">Fig. 4</a>b). It is 14.0 cm. long, 9.9 cm. wide, and -3.1 cm. thick.</p> -<p>One of the most interesting aspects of this 35+ year old male burial is the -possible “trophy” skeletal materials placed on the knee area. Remains of three -persons and possibly a fourth were found in a fragmentary condition, and while -some of the long bones were intact, the cranial remains present were shattered. -Two explanations seem most obvious: (1) the remains are the result of some -type of human sacrifice, or (2) they are secondary burial of remains disturbed -from their original location. These ideas will be more fully explored later in the -paper.</p> -<p><i>Burial 2.</i> The skeletal material recovered from this burial was very fragmentary -and the actual number of individuals involved could be three rather than the two -suggested in the anatomical analysis. No complete skeleton was found, rather a -series of jumbled long bones with the femur head facing southwest (Figs. <a href="#fig25">2</a> and -<a href="#fig28">5</a>), suggesting an extended burial on a northeast-southwest axis. At the knee -area was found a skull which showed evidence of burning. This data, even more -than that of Burial 1, suggests “human sacrifice” or some such exotic behavior. -Because some of the long bones were burnt too, it is possible the firing occurred -as a part of the burial ritual. At the northeastern end of the burial was found a -child’s skull; its relationship to the adult is unclear at this time.</p> -<p>Also associated with Burial 2 was a ceramic vessel and a fresh water mollusc -spoon (<a href="#fig29">Fig. 6</a>a-b). The spoon was very fragile and crumbled on cleaning. The -vessel was a small globular jar with an everted rim and two strap handles. On -the shoulder of the vessel below the handles were incised double nestled chevrons, -while two single incised lines ran vertically from neck to base between the -handles (<a href="#fig29">Fig. 6</a>a). The handles had double incised lines on them. The vessel was -shell tempered with a slight scalloping of the lip. It was 7.63 cm. high, the orifice -was 6.27 and 6.07 cm. in diameter, while the shoulder was 9.95 and 9.5 cm. -in diameter. The vessel seems to be a typical Oneota form.</p> -<p><i>Burial 3.</i> This burial was extended with head to the northeast and body on a -northeast-southwest axis (<a href="#fig30">Fig. 7</a>). It was a child’s, and the only grave goods -associated with it was a chert scraper (<a href="#fig27">Fig. 4</a>c). It was found south of the pelvic -area. It is cream chert, is 3.39 cm. long, 1.78 cm. wide and 0.6 cm. thick. Anterioral -and posterioral flattening of the frontal and occipital region is marked on -this individual’s skull.</p> -<p><i>Burial 4.</i> The burial when found was highly fragmentary; the legs are all that -remain. No artifacts were found with it. Alignment of the legs indicates that the -head was to the northeast and the body was on a northeast-southwest axis. However, -in the process of analyzing these data it was discovered that by projecting -the former location of the missing head and torso, this burial seems to be associated -with the isolated pot from square 0-40W. As figures <a href="#fig25">2</a> and <a href="#fig31">8</a> show, the -vessel would have been placed beside the left shoulder.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_53">53</div> -<div class="img" id="fig27"> -<img src="images/p14.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="842" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 4. Artifacts recovered from the Utlaut site, 23SA162W: a. triangular -un-notched projectile point, Burial 1; b. Biface chopper/scraper, -Burial 1; c. scraper, Burial 3.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_54">54</div> -<div class="img" id="fig28"> -<img src="images/p15.jpg" alt="" width="570" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 5. Burial 2, 235A162W. View is toward northeast.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_55">55</div> -<div class="img" id="fig29"> -<img src="images/p15a.jpg" alt="" width="664" height="600" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 6. Top and side views of vessels recovered at the Utlaut site, -23SA162W: a-b Burial 2; c-d Burial 4.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_56">56</div> -<div class="img" id="fig30"> -<img src="images/p16.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="481" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 7. Burial 3, 23SA162W. View is toward the south. Burial 4 is -to the left.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_57">57</div> -<p>This oval-shaped vessel has 14 rows of punctations running around the -whole surface. There are two strap handles each with two incised lines placed -vertical to the rim (<a href="#fig29">Fig. 6</a>c-d). The rim has been damaged by the plow. Orifice -size is 8.21 cm. at the handles and 7.7 cm. between them. It is 12.36 by 13.2 cm. -at the shoulder and 8.15 cm. high (incomplete).</p> -<p>Vessels with similar extensive all-over punctation are reported from the -Lower Mississippi River Valley and called Parkin Punctated (Phillips, Ford and -Griffin 1951:Fig. 94). But a vessel with extensive punctation over the upper -two-thirds of it, with some zoned punctates in parallel lines below the handles, -has been reported from Gumbo Point (23SA4), an historic Missouri site about -a mile and a quarter to the northeast (Chapman 1959:Fig. 36).</p> -<p>Henning (1970) does not report such a design from the Utz site nor other -nearby Oneota sites. This tempts one to suggest the vessel has stronger affinities -to the historic Missouri than to the Oneota component nearby.</p> -<p><i>Burial 5.</i> These highly fragmentary remains probably belong with the child in -Burial 2. They were found in the northeast corner of square 5N-50W which is -just north of the area of the child’s skull in Burial 2.</p> -<p><i>Burial 6.</i> This individual was interred in a different pattern from the others. It -was semi-flexed with the head and shoulders slumped forward and down as if -the burial pit was not large enough to hold him (Figs. <a href="#fig25">2</a> and <a href="#fig32">9</a>). Rodents had -run through the chest area and gnawed some of the bone.</p> -<p>Grave goods consisted of a whole vessel and glass trade beads. The vessel, -which was at his knee, was a globular jar having two strap handles with four -incised lines running vertically from the rim, and double nestled chevrons below -them. The chevron was filled with narrow-line, incised punctates (<a href="#fig33">Fig. 10</a>a-b). -The rim was damaged. The vessel is 10.5 by 11.7 cm. at the orifice, 16.3 by 18.0 -cm. at the shoulder and 12.8 cm. high, making it slightly oval in shape.</p> -<p>Two kinds of beads were found. One was a “seed” bead <i>ca.</i> 0.18 cm. in -diameter with a 0.05 cm. hole. There were 202 of these found in the sand around -the head and shoulders. They may have been in the hair. All were turquoise in -color. The second kind included three larger specimens—two turquoise blue and -one black. The blue were 0.66 x 0.84 cm., 0.8 x 0.75 cm. and 0.82 x 0.63 cm. in -diameter and length. The first had a 0.2 cm. hole and the others 0.18 cm. The -black was 0.58 x 0.58 cm. with a 0.12 cm. hole. These beads were found in the -area of the left wrist.</p> -<p>These materials are historic trade goods, and are not significantly different -from those at Gumbo Point (Chapman 1959) or at the Utz site (Robert T. Bray, -personal communication). Although these materials could be the result of English -or even American trading activities, it is thought they are French, for the -following reasons.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_58">58</div> -<div class="img" id="fig31"> -<img src="images/p17.jpg" alt="" width="547" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 8. Burial 4 23SA162W. View is toward the southwest. The -skull of Burial 3 is in the right hand corner.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_59">59</div> -<div class="img" id="fig32"> -<img src="images/p17a.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="541" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 9. View of Burial 6, 23SA162W. View is toward the north.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_60">60</div> -<div class="img" id="fig33"> -<img src="images/p18.jpg" alt="" width="460" height="1000" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 10. Top and side view of vessel recovered with Burial 6 at the -Utlaut site, 23SA162W.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_61">61</div> -<p>It is probable that this individual was a member of the Gumbo Point late -Missouri village which may date 1727-1777 A.D. (Chapman 1959:63). This village -was very near Fort Orleans which dates 1723-1728 A.D. (Bray 1961a:216-219). -At the same time, this burial is associated with others which have no trade -goods and apparently are completely prehistoric. Therefore, one could argue that -the body was interred at the time of the proto-historic-historic boundary for -that village. That boundary would be about 1727 A.D. if Chapman’s (1959:2) -assumed dating of the beginning of the village following the abandonment of -the Utz site is correct.</p> -<p>However, it could be argued that Burial 6 had nothing to do with the -Oneota burials with it, and that the body could date as late as 1777 A.D. But -for that to be so, we would have to assume it was just chance that of the several -old beaches in that field this Indian was placed right in an earlier burial -area. Rather, it seems more reasonable to have the cemetery area known and -indeed the burials marked, so that the interment could take place without disturbing -them.</p> -<p>Whether the Missouri Indians marked their graves cannot be stated, as no -data on their mortuary practices are known. We do know that the Winnebago -placed a post at the head of a grave (Radin 1923:144), and as the Missouri and -Winnebago are both Chiwere Sioux, it is possible that this is an old shared trait. -If this is so, and if the 1727 A.D. dating is correct, the trade goods are probably -French as they were extremely active in this area at this early date.</p> -<h3 id="c17">DISCUSSION</h3> -<p>Two separate, but related, cultural components are present at the site: Oneota -and historic Missouri. Burials 1 through 4 were originally supine extended interments, -although they have suffered much from plowing, and their associated -artifacts indicate a general Oneota affiliation. Burial 4 with its punctated vessel -though is probably late, bordering on the late proto-historic-historic Missouri -line. Burial 6, with its glass trade beads, is historic, and since the Gumbo Point -site (23SA4), a historic Missouri village dating around 1727-1777 A.D., is only -one and a quarter miles to the northeast of the Utlaut site, the burial is probably -an Indian of that village.</p> -<p>The following data on Oneota burial practices can be extracted from these -data. Individuals are buried in a supine extended position on a northeast-southwest -axis. In three cases, Burials 1, 3 and 4, the head is to the northeast; in one, -Burial 2, it is southwest. Grave goods of pots, projectile point, shell spoon or -scraper were present but seemingly not very diagnostic of social position, although -the pots may be associated only with children here (Burials 2 and 4). -Also, unless one assumes everyone was buried at the same time, it seems that -the graves were marked so people could be interred over a period of time without -<span class="pb" id="Page_62">62</span> -disturbing early graves, and so they could be aligned with each other.</p> -<p>Two adults seem to have “trophy” skeletal materials with them: a skull on -the knees of Burial 2 (burnt) and many fragments of three and possibly four -people on the lower legs of Burial 1. Bray (1961b:17-19) reports a “trophy head” -with an Orr focus Oneota burial at the Flynn site, and glass trade beads with it -point to this being an historic Ioway trait. Because there is no historic data on -Missouri Indian burial practices, it is not possible now to tell if the trait is associated -with them nor just what it may mean.</p> -<p>One could explain the skeletal remains, especially those with Burial 1 as -secondary interments of graves which were somehow disturbed. In which case -the term “trophy” would be inappropriate and misleading. This possibility is -found in the fact that the Winnebago had two burial patterns: inhumation and -platform associated with the phratry divisions of the culture, although the latter -practice died out in historic times (Radin 1923:140). Since the Missouri are related -to the Winnebago it is possible that these materials are inhumed platform -burials.</p> -<p>However, the presence of single skulls with Burial 2, burnt too, and with -an Ioway at the Flynn site cannot be explained that easily. The skull on the -knees of Burial 2 was burnt at the time of interment as the knee area was also -burned. Then too, if one was collecting platform burial remains to be inhumed, -more than just the skulls would be lying about to be collected. Again if we -look at the Winnebago we get some interesting data. In a discussion of grave-post -markings, Radin (1923:155) points out that a warrior who had killed a -man and cut off his head received a special grave-post signifying the deed. Unfortunately, -he does not tell us if the head was buried with him.</p> -<p>As can be seen by the above discussion, there are data to support both interpretations, -and indeed, maybe these burials in fact are the result of both sets -of behavior rather than only one set.</p> -<p>A comparison of the Utlaut site Oneota burials with other Oneota burial -data follows. From the Leary site in Nebraska Wedel reports (1935:25-26) two -types of interments: (1) supine burials with beads to the north (3), east (3) or -south (2). Associated with them are knives, hematite and a bison hoe as grave -goods. (2) Bundled or jumbled bones within a pit and probably removed from -scaffolds. Bass reports (1961) a body without head, semi-flexed on its back and -left side.</p> -<p>Myers and Bass (n.d.) give the following data on Oneota burial material -from Iowa. At the Hartley site (13AM103) in Allamakee County, Burial 1 was -primary extended with head west and face north. It was a child about ten years -old and with it was a pot and chert knife. Burial 2 was a female, 20-30 years old, -primary extended with head northeast and no artifacts. Burial 3 was a child, 10-13 -years old with a pot. It was a secondary burial. Burial 4 was a female, 20-30 -years of age, primary extended with head to the east. A bison scapula hoe was -with it. Burial 5 was a male, 25-35 years old; it was a primary one with the body -<span class="pb" id="Page_63">63</span> -in a semi-sitting position and head on chest. The head faced northwest and the -face was down. No grave goods were present. Burial 7 was a secondary bundled -indeterminate adult. Burial 8 was a female, 18-28 years, primary extended burial -with head to the northwest and no artifacts. Burial 10 was a nine year old child, -primary extended with head to east. A pot was associated with it (Myers and -Bass n.d.:7-11).</p> -<p>At the Blood Run site (13L02) in Lyon county, five burials were reported -by Myers and Bass (n.d.). Burial 1 was a 3 to 4 year old child. It was extended -in a pit in a mound with head facing northwest. Associated were copper earrings, -two wooden tubes at the ears and a rim sherd at the right elbow. Burial 2 was -a 30-40 year old male, extended supine with head northwest and no artifacts. -Burial 3 was a 35-45 year old male, extended with head north and face to the -east. It may be burnt on the left side. Associated was a catlinite pipe and a shell -bead. Burial 4 was a male, 21-28 years of age, extended supine with head northeast -and no artifacts. Finally, Burial 5 was a 2-3 year old child, associated with -Burial 2; the grave goods were three blue glass beads (Myers and Bass n.d.:35-40).</p> -<p>At Correctionville site the burials are reported as extended supine (Myers -and Bass n.d.:43). At the Flynn site (13AM51) in Allamakee county ten burials -were recovered (Bray 1961b: 15-18). Burial 1 was a fully extended, supine adult -with head to north. Associated were a raven skull, two bone beads, two shell -beads, two copper or brass ornaments, a bone pendant and a small animal scapula. -Burial 2 was a fully extended supine adult with head north. Associated were -a pumice lump, red ochre, rolled copper or brass tubes, chert flakes and a belt -of rolled copper or brass beads. Burial 3 was a fully extended supine adult with -two triangular projectile points and some small animal bones. Burial 4 was a -fully extended supine adult oriented east-west. No trade goods were found; only -aboriginal bone whistles, a heron beak, a bone tube and a squirrel skull. Burial -5 was an adult oriented north-south and accompanied by many offerings: a pot, -a fresh water clam shell, 100 copper/brass beads, 12 copper/brass bracelets, sheet -copper, two steel knives, a steel awl, chert flakes, glass beads and “bead” girdle -as in Burial 1. Burial 6 was a fully extended supine adult with a north-south -orientation, with the head north. Artifact associations were blue and green glass -beads, a beaver incisor, chert flakes, a polished bison rib, a beaded girdle as with -Burials 1 and 5 and a “trophy” human skull at the left knee area. Burial 7 was -different because it was deeper, under slabs of rock, and in a pit. Present was a -child’s skull and two carnivore jaws. Burials 8 and 9 were incomplete and damaged, -but seem to have been an adult and a 30-month old child. Burial 10 was a -fetus or newborn infant.</p> -<p>Ten burials are reported (Henning 1970:120-212) from the Utz site (23SA2), -the nearest large Oneota site just a few miles east of the Utlaut site. Position, -sex and age are known only for a few. Burial 3 was a 27 year old male, fully extended -<span class="pb" id="Page_64">64</span> -with a mussel shell, sheet copper and bone tube. Burial 4 consisted of -two adults, but only one complete, fully extended 40 year old female. Burial 5 -was a 30 year old male with a bone awl, a deer phalanx and worked hematite. -Burial 7 was a 35 year old male with knives and abrader. Burial 8 was fully extended, -35 years old, male, covered with red ochre and was accompanied by several -chert flakes. He may have died of wounds, since a projectile point was found -in the cervical vertebrae. Finally, in the summer of 1970 an adult male was found -in a storage/trash pit at the site (Robert T. Bray, personal communication).</p> -<p>Having reviewed the data on Oneota burials in Nebraska, Iowa and Missouri, -the following hypotheses or assertions or guesses are offered concerning -the general character of Oneota mortuary practices. Hopefully they will be tested -in the future when more, especially descriptive, data become available.</p> -<p>(1) The bodies typically seem to be supine and fully extended.</p> -<p>(2) Orientation to a specific cardinal point does not seem to be involved as -they range all around the compass.</p> -<p>(3) There appears to be some evidence that the graves were marked.</p> -<p>(4) Although most burials have some grave goods material, some do not. -Except for the “trophy” material and the fact that some of the historic burials -have more artifacts, there do not seem to be marked differences in the wealth -of the burials. Possibly each individual is accompanied by some personal tool or -ornament. At the Flynn, Hartley and Utlaut sites, burials of children are accompanied -by ceramic vessels—at the Blood Run site, with a rim sherd. If this -is a pattern, it changed in historic times because burials with pots and trade -goods are adult (Flynn, B. 5, and Utlaut, B. 6).</p> -<p>(5) The lack of rich burials in the proto-historic (Oneota) period and their -presence in the historic suggests a process of social stratification may be occurring -because of new wealth. But this may be more apparent than real, if the -“trophy” material at the Utlaut site was the proto-historic means of marking -status to be replaced in the historic period by trade goods. If that is so, then it -would suggest some social stratification in Oneota continuing through to the -known historic Missouri chiefs.</p> -<p class="tb"><i>Acknowledgments.</i> The senior author is pleased to acknowledge the support of -Kansas State University’s Bureau of General Research for a 1970 Summer Fellowship. -The fellowship made possible this research. The cooperation of Robert -T. Bray, Director, Lyman Archaeological Research Center, University of Missouri, -is gratefully acknowledged for his help and many kindnesses throughout -this work. To him, and my other colleagues: Alfred E. Johnson and W. Raymond -Wood, who all helped to run the joint Midwestern Archaeological Field -School in the summer of 1970 go my thanks. William M. Bass kindly loaned me -the Myers and Bass manuscript which was most appreciated as it was essential -for this analysis. Finally, thanks are due to the students of the field school who -excavated these materials: Mike Gilman, Tom Green, Kevin Hart, Ann Hirsh -<span class="pb" id="Page_65">65</span> -and Donna Roper, for without their good spirits and effort the work could not -have been done.</p> -<h3 id="c18">REFERENCES CITED</h3> -<dl class="undent"><dt>ANDERSON, J. E.</dt> -<dd class="t">1969 <i>The Human Skeleton: A Manual for Archaeologists.</i> National Museum of Canada, Ottawa.</dd> -<dt>BASS, WILLIAM M.</dt> -<dd class="t">1971 Personal Communication.</dd> -<dt>BASS, WILLIAM M.</dt> -<dd class="t">1961 1960 Excavations at the Leary Site, Richardson County, Nebraska 25RH1. <i>Plains Anthropologist</i>, 6: 31, 201-202.</dd> -<dt>BRAY, ROBERT T.</dt> -<dd class="t">1961a The Missouri Indian Tribe in Archaeology and History. <i>Missouri Historical Review</i>, LV: 3, 213-225. Columbia.</dd> -<dd class="t">1961b The Flynn Cemetery: An Orr Focus Oneota Burial Site in Allamakee County, Iowa. <i>Journal of the Iowa Archaeological Society</i>, 10: 4, 15-25.</dd> -<dt>BROTHWELL, DON R.</dt> -<dd class="t">1963 <i>Digging Up Bones.</i> British Museum, London.</dd> -<dt>HENNING, DALE R.</dt> -<dd class="t">1970 Development and Interrelationships of Oneota Culture in the Lower Missouri River Valley. <i>The Missouri Archaeologist</i>, Vol. 32, Whole Volume. Columbia.</dd> -<dt>KROGMAN, WILTON M.</dt> -<dd class="t">1962 <i>The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine.</i> Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.</dd> -<dt>MCKERN, THOMAS W. AND T. D. STEWART</dt> -<dd class="t">1957 <i>Skeletal Age Changes in Young American Males.</i> Technical Report EP-45, Quartermaster Research and Development Center, U.S. Army, Natick, Massachusetts.</dd> -<dt>MORSE, DAN</dt> -<dd class="t">1969 <i>Ancient Disease in the Midwest.</i> Reports of Investigations No. 15, Illinois State Museum.</dd> -<dt>MYERS, JUDY A. AND WILLIAM M. BASS</dt> -<dd class="t">n.d. An Analysis of the Human Skeletal Material from Some Oneota Sites. Unpublished Manuscript.</dd> -<dt>TROTTER, MILDRED AND GOLDEN C. GLESER</dt> -<dd class="t">1958 A Re-evaluation of Estimation of Stature Based on Measurements of Stature During Life and of Long Bones After Death. <i>American Journal of Physical Anthropology</i>, 16: 1, 79-124. Philadelphia.</dd> -<dt class="pb" id="Page_66">66</dt> -<dt>PHILLIPS, P., J. A. FORD AND J. B. GRIFFIN</dt> -<dd class="t">1951 Archaeological Survey in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, 1940-1947. <i>Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University</i>, Vol. XXV. Cambridge.</dd> -<dt>RADIN, PAUL</dt> -<dd class="t">1923 <i>The Winnebago Tribe.</i> Thirty-seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution.</dd></dl> -<div class="pb" id="Page_67">67</div> -<h2 id="c19"><span class="small">APPENDIX I</span> -<br />SKELETAL REMAINS FROM THE UTLAUT SITE</h2> -<p class="center">by -<br />Kevin Hart and Clark Larsen</p> -<p>The following paper reports the osteological data on the burials from the -Utlaut site. The authors are indebted to Dr. William M. Bass, formerly of the -University of Kansas, now Chairman, Department of Anthropology, University -of Tennessee, for his encouragement and criticisms on this paper, and especially -for his training while Visiting Professor of Anthropology at Kansas State University -in the Spring, 1971. He is, of course, not responsible for any errors on -our part.</p> -<dl class="undent"><dt><i>Burial 1</i></dt> -<dd class="t3">Sex: Male</dd> -<dd class="t3">Age: 35⁺</dd> -<dd class="t3">Stature: 5′8″ ± 1.28″ (173.46 cm ± 3.24 cm)</dd></dl> -<p>Burial One is a middle aged male in good condition, represented by an almost -complete skeleton. Of the major bones, only the left radius, right ulna and -left clavicle are absent, along with the second cervical, four thoracic and one -lumbar vertebra. Except for eight phalanges of the hand, all of the hand and -feet bones are also missing.</p> -<p>The sex of the individual is based on several factors. First, the width of the -femur head is 46 mm., within the male range according to Krogman (1962:143-146). -The skull is characterized by heavy brow ridges, blunt upper edges of the -eye orbits, and a general overall ruggedness indicating a male. The pelvis, however, -does have a wider than usual sciatic notch for a male.</p> -<p>Despite some erosion, the pubic symphyses show a breakdown of the symphyseal -rim and face indicating an age of 38⁺ (McKern and Stewart:83). Endocranial -suture closure is complete, suggesting an approximate age of at least 40. -Thirdly, toothwear on the remaining molars seem to follow the pattern in Brothwell -(1963:69) for the 35-45 age group.</p> -<p>The Stature was calculated using the formula 1.22 (Femur and Tibia) + -70.37 ± 3.24 (Trotter and Gleser 1958:120).</p> -<p>Both the tibiae (<a href="#fig34">Fig. 11</a>) and fibulae show evidence of inflammation of the -Periosteum (Periostitis), similar to cases noted in Morse (1969:108). In addition, -one lumbar vertebra has an anomalous growth on it, and the chin of the individual -protrudes abnormally. The hole in the skull shown in the burial picture is the -result of an accident in the excavation.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_68">68</div> -<div class="img" id="fig34"> -<img src="images/p19.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="382" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 11. Tibiae from Burial 1, 23SA162W, showing evidence of -periostitis.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_69">69</div> -<p>Resting on and around the knees of Burial One were a number of whole -bones and bone fragments of at least three other individuals.</p> -<table class="center"> -<tr class="th"><th class="l"><i>Sex</i> </th><th class="l"><i>Age</i> </th><th class="l"><i>Stature</i></th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Male </td><td class="l">30⁺ </td><td class="l">——</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">—— </td><td class="l">30⁺ </td><td class="l">——</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">—— </td><td class="l">—— </td><td class="l">——</td></tr> -</table> -<p>These bones were laid in a haphazard manner. Most of the larger post cranial -bones are represented by fragments from two separate individuals, but there are -parts of three left femora present and possibly four. The poor condition of the -fourth femur fragment left the side in doubt. The skull fragments are from at -least two different persons. Mixed in with these human bones are two tibia fragments -from a deer.</p> -<p>A skull fragment from one individual shows heavy muscle marking on the -occipital region, and a fairly large mastoid process, suggesting a male. There are -insufficient pieces of skull from the other individual or individuals for any judgment -on their sex. The pieces of innominate are also fragmentary, although it -appears that one acetabulum is rather large, possibly indicating a large femur -head. While the long bones from all the individuals seem large, all the femur -and humerus heads are missing, preventing any measurements for sex. All the -long bones are broken.</p> -<p>The age determination is based on the presence of completely closed endocranial -sutures on the skull fragments of two persons, suggesting a mature age. -Although suture closure is not a good criterion for age (McKern and Stewart -1957:37), a more accurate age estimate is not possible because of the absence of -pubic symphyses and teeth.</p> -<p>Stature could not be determined because of the broken condition of the long -bones.</p> -<p class="tb"><i>Burial 2</i></p> -<p>There are at least two individuals represented in this burial.</p> -<table class="center"> -<tr class="th"><th class="l"><i>Sex</i> </th><th class="l"><i>Age</i> </th><th class="l"><i>Stature</i></th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Male </td><td class="l">28-35 </td><td class="l">5′9.3″ (175.9 cm ± 3.24 cm)</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">—— </td><td class="l">3-6 </td><td class="l">——</td></tr> -</table> -<p>The adult bones associated with this burial included the upper portion of a -skull, right and left femur, right and left tibia, two fibula fragments, a first sacral -vertebra, and fragments of both the right and left innominates. The child is -represented by a left parietal. Several of the skull fragments as well as the right -femur and sacral vertebra of the adult showed evidence of burning. Most of the -skeletal material is fragmentary and in poor condition.</p> -<p>The age of the adult is based on cranial suture closure. The sutures endocranially -are closing, but ectocranially the sutures are still quite distinctive and -have not yet begun to close. This indicates an age of 28 to 35 years. However, -<span class="pb" id="Page_70">70</span> -some authorities feel this is not a good criterion for aging (McKern and Stewart -1957:37).</p> -<p>The sex is based on morphological characteristics of the cranial material. -The skull contained large frontal sinuses and heavy muscle markings, indicative -of the male sex (Krogman 1962:112-152).</p> -<p>Stature was based on the formula for Mongoloids given by Trotter and -Gleser (1958:120) for the femur plus the tibia. Using the left femur plus the -tibia the stature estimation was calculated to be 5′9.3″ with a range from 5′8″ -to 5′10.6″ (175.9 cm ± 3.24 cm). This stature is also indicative of the male sex.</p> -<p>Age of the child is determined by the thickness and size of the left parietal. -This indicated an age of probably not younger than three and not older than six.</p> -<dl class="undent"><dt><i>Burial 3</i></dt> -<dd class="t3">Age: 10-12</dd></dl> -<p>This child’s burial consisted of the major portion of an articulated skull, a -mandible, a left scapula, right and left tibia, right and left femur, right and left -innominates, two rib fragments, and two lumbar vertebrae. The condition of this -burial is poor with all the bones being in various stages of fragmentation.</p> -<p>The age of this individual is based on tooth eruption and wear. The adult -second molars are fully erupted and show no wear. The adult second premolars -are in the process of erupting, indicating an age of 10-12 (Brothwell 1963:59).</p> -<p>Skull deformation is quite noticeable. It is flattened both anteriorly and -posteriorly, particularly in the frontal and occipital regions. This deformation is -probably due to pressure applied to the head of the infant through binding to a -flat structure, such as a cradle board (<a href="#fig35">Fig. 12</a>).</p> -<p>All mandibular teeth are present with no caries or tartar. The adult second -premolars are quite late in erupting. As previously indicated the skull is mostly -articulated, but is in poor condition. Parts of the frontal and occipital are missing.</p> -<dl class="undent"><dt><i>Burial 4</i></dt> -<dd class="t3">Sex: Indeterminate</dd> -<dd class="t3">Age: Child</dd> -<dd class="t3">Stature: Indeterminate</dd></dl> -<p>Burial four is the remains of one individual: a child, in poor condition. The -remaining bones are fragments from the right femur, tibia and fibula, and from -the left tibia. In addition, there were also several unidentifiable pieces. The size -and condition of the fragments make any specific judgment as to sex, age, or -stature impossible other than to say the individual was rather young. No anomalies -or pathologies were evident.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_71">71</div> -<div class="img" id="fig35"> -<img src="images/p20.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="950" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 12. Right and left profiles of the skull from Burial 3, 23SA162W, -showing skull deformation.</p> -</div> -<div class="pb" id="Page_72">72</div> -<dl class="undent"><dt><i>Burial 6</i></dt> -<dd class="t3">Age: 19-25</dd> -<dd class="t3">Sex: Male</dd> -<dd class="t3">Stature: 5′8.6″ ± 1.3″ (174.2 cm ± 3.24 cm)</dd></dl> -<p>Most of the bones of this burial are present with the exception of the majority -of the hand phalanges, carpal and tarsal bones, one lumbar vertebra, and -the coccygeal vertebrae. The condition of the bones is fair.</p> -<p>The age of this individual is based on the fact that the basilar suture has -just closed and the sacral vertebrae have not completely fused. The sutures have -not yet begun to close, and all of the epiphyses of the long boxes have united, -suggesting an age range of 19 to 25.</p> -<p>Sex determination is based on morphological and anthropometric characteristics -of both the post-cranial and cranial skeleton. The diameter of the femur -head is 46 mm, well within the male range (Krogman 1962:143-146). The innominates -showed narrow pubic portions and sub-pubic angles. The skull has -distinctive muscle markings, large mastoid processes, heavy brow ridges, and a -square chin, all of which are characteristically male.</p> -<p>The stature estimation was calculated from the length of the left femur and -tibia, using Trotter and Gleser’s formula for Mongoloids (Trotter and Gleser -1958:120). It was calculated to be 5′8.6″ with a range from 5′7.3″ to 5′9.9″ (1.74 -cm ± 3.24 cm). As indicated in <a href="#table4">Table 2</a>, this individual was hyperbrachycranic -or very broad headed. As in Burial 3, lambdoidal flattening was quite noticeable, -probably a result of pressure of a cradle board.</p> -<p>Due to the poor condition of the material from the Utlaut site, anatomical -comparisons other than male stature are not possible. <a href="#table5">Table 3</a> gives the stature -comparisons of the Iowa-Nebraska Oneota material, and they suggest that for -height of males, the Utlaut population are most similar to the males at the Leary -site in Nebraska.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_73">73</div> -<table class="center"> -<tr class="th"><th id="table3" colspan="6">Table 1</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th colspan="6">Post-cranial Measurements (in millimeters) and Indices for Skeletal Material from The Utlaut Site, 23SA162W</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th> </th><th colspan="2">Burial 1 </th><th colspan="2">Burial 2 </th><th colspan="2">Burial 6</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th> </th><th>R </th><th>L </th><th>R </th><th>L </th><th>R </th><th>L</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th>Femur</th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Maximum morphological length </td><td class="c">451 </td><td class="c">455 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">485 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">454</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">A-P diameter midshaft </td><td class="c">31 </td><td class="c">31.5 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">27.5</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Transverse diameter midshaft </td><td class="c">26 </td><td class="c">27.5 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">24</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Maximum diameter of head </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">46 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">46</td></tr> -<tr class="th"><th>Tibia</th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Maximum morphological length </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">390 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">380 </td><td class="c">(392)<a class="fn" id="fr_1" href="#fn_1">[1]</a> </td><td class="c">397</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">A-P diameter nutrient foramen </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">40 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">36 </td><td class="c">35</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Transverse diameter nutrient foramen </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">23 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">26 </td><td class="c">25</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Bicondylar breadth </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">79 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">—</td></tr> -<tr class="th"><th> </th><th colspan="6">Post Cranial Indices</th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Pilastric Index </td><td class="c">119.24 </td><td class="c">114.28 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">116.67</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Cnemic Index </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">56.00 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">72.22 </td><td class="c">71.42</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Crural Index </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">85.49 </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">— </td><td class="c">87.45</td></tr> -</table> -<table class="center"> -<tr class="th"><th id="table4" colspan="2">Table 2</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th colspan="2">Cranial Measurements (in millimeters) and Indices</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th colspan="2">Burial 2</th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Parietal thickness near bregma (average) </td><td class="c">3</td></tr> -<tr class="th"><th colspan="2">Burial 6</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th>Cranium</th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Maximum length </td><td class="c">161</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Maximum breadth </td><td class="c">150</td></tr> -<tr class="pbtr"><td colspan="2"> -</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Basion-bregma </td><td class="c">128</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Bizygomatic </td><td class="c">126</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Basi-nasal length </td><td class="c">96.5</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Basi-alveolar length </td><td class="c">91</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Nasion-alveolar height </td><td class="c">68</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Left orbital breadth </td><td class="c">43</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Left orbital height </td><td class="c">34</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Nasal breadth </td><td class="c">24</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Nasal height </td><td class="c">52</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Palatal length </td><td class="c">46</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Palatal breadth </td><td class="c">39</td></tr> -<tr class="th"><th>Mandible</th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Maximum length </td><td class="c">(76)<a class="fn" href="#fn_1">[1]</a></td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Symphysis height </td><td class="c">37</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Bigonial diameter </td><td class="c">(101)<a class="fn" href="#fn_1">[1]</a></td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Foramen mentale breadth </td><td class="c">49</td></tr> -<tr class="th"><th> </th><th>Cranial Indices</th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Cranial module </td><td class="c">146.33</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Cranial index </td><td class="c">93.17</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Height-length index </td><td class="c">79.50</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Height-breadth index </td><td class="c">85.33</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Upper facial index </td><td class="c">54.97</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Nasal index </td><td class="c">46.15</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Orbital index </td><td class="c">79.07</td></tr> -</table> -<div class="pb" id="Page_75">75</div> -<table class="center"> -<tr class="th"><th id="table5" colspan="3">Table 3</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th colspan="3">Comparison of Male Stature for Oneota Indians</th></tr> -<tr class="th"><th><span class="u">Utlaut Site</span> </th><th colspan="2"><span class="u">Height</span></th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Burial 1 (Oneota) </td><td class="l">173.46 </td><td class="l">cm</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Burial 2 (Oneota) </td><td class="l">175.9 </td><td class="l">cm</td></tr> -<tr class="th"><th><span class="u">Oneota Sites</span><a class="fn" id="fr_2" href="#fn_2">[2]</a> </th><th colspan="2"><span class="u">Mean Height</span></th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Leary site (Nebraska) </td><td class="l">173.1 </td><td class="l">cm</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Hartley site (Iowa) </td><td class="l">164.2 </td><td class="l">cm</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Leary site (Nebraska) </td><td class="l">173.1 </td><td class="l">cm</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Flynn site (Iowa) </td><td class="l">169.7 </td><td class="l">cm</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Blood Run site (Iowa) </td><td class="l">168.2 </td><td class="l">cm</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Correctionville site (Iowa) </td><td class="l">171.2 </td><td class="l">cm</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">All sites </td><td class="l">170.0 </td><td class="l">cm</td></tr> -</table> -<div class="pb" id="Page_76">76</div> -<h2 id="c20"><span class="small">A REPORT OF SALVAGE INVESTIGATIONS AT ST. CHARLES, MISSOURI</span></h2> -<p class="center">by J. M. Shippee</p> -<p>In the latter part of August 1956, Mr. Andrew H. McCulloch of St. Charles, -Missouri addressed a letter to the Department of Anthropology, University of -Missouri, in which he told of the discovery of buried remains which were thought -to be of Indian origin. Road construction in a new housing area just north of St. -Charles, Missouri had exposed an Indian camp site on high ground overlooking -the Missouri-Mississippi River flood plain. Mr. McCulloch had been informed -by the land owner, Mr. J. D. Wright, that a portion of a grave had been opened, -exposing bones of humans and animals and broken pottery vessels.</p> -<p>The letter was delivered to Carl H. Chapman, then Director of American -Archaeology at the university, who visited the site and decided that further investigations -were advisable. Professor Chapman directed the writer to make -limited investigations at the site. This work was done in 3 days beginning September -1, with the very capable assistance of Leonard Blake and Winton Meyer -of St. Louis, and Robert Wright of St. Charles.</p> -<p>The new road cut which exposed the remains is located at the eastern edge -of an old field, which has an elevation of 90 feet above the river flood plain. -Erosion had removed much of the dark topsoil from above the light colored -loess, which apparently is very deep. At five locations in the road cut, dark deposits -of cultural debris were observed in clearly defined pits which had been -cross-sectioned by the grading machines. These pits were grouped at the deeper -excavations for the road which were approximately 500 feet apart. At several -places, in loose earth along the road, Indian artifacts were found where the grading -operations had deposited them; their exact provenience is therefore, doubtful.</p> -<p>Pits <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were at the north end of the field and were exposed in the vertical -bank at the east side of the new road. Both had been gouged by curious -persons, and nothing is known of the material removed prior to the work described -here.</p> -<p>Pit <i>A</i> could be clearly defined in outline beneath 28 inches of overburden. -This overburden consisted of 4 inches of top soil and 24 inches of light colored -soil. The pit outlined by the cultural fill measured 8 inches deep, and had been -approximately 40 inches in diameter. Excavation later revealed that the deposit -extended only 13 inches into the bank, the greater part of the deposit having -been previously removed. The sterile overburden was examined as it was removed -from above the pit. The pit fill was so compact that Blake had difficulty -in examining it. The deposit contained 3 rimsherds (<a href="#fig36">Fig. 1</a>) and 31 bodysherds -in the upper part, and considerable bone scrap of animals in the lower. A trace -of burned clay and a few small lumps of fired limestone were scattered in the -fill. Charred wood was collected for radiocarbon dating, and according to Dr. -J. B. Griffin of the University of Michigan and Professor H. R. Crane, University -of Michigan Memorial-Phoenix Radiocarbon Laboratory, it was found to be -dated (M-619)—1240±200 years before present, which would give the date before -1950 as A.D. 710±200. Also found in the pit were a few flint flakes and -one crude flint blank. The bones in pit <i>A</i> were thought to be from game animals -and consisted of 5 mandibles and 2 long bones. A large mandible, from which -all the teeth had been removed by pot-hunters, is thought to be that of a bison. -Three mandibles were from deer.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_77">77</div> -<div class="img" id="fig36"> -<img src="images/p21.jpg" alt="" width="507" height="800" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 1. Pit A pottery</p> -</div> -<dl class="undent pcap"><dt>a</dt> -<dd>THE LIP HAS BEEN SMOOTHED.</dd> -<dd>THE CORDMARKED EXTERIOR SURFACE IS BROWN, THE INTERIOR IS DARK GREY</dd> -<dt>b</dt> -<dt>c</dt> -<dd>EXTERIOR COLOR OF b AND C IS DARK BROWN TO LIGHT BROWN. THE CORDMARKING IS TYPICAL OF THE SITE, INTERIORS ARE SMOOTH, COLOR IS A DULL BROWN. THE TEMPER IS CLAY</dd> -<dt>c</dt> -<dd>THIS SHERD IS PROBABLY NAPLES DENTATE STAMPED OF THE MIDDLE WOODLAND OR HOPEWELL COMPLEX. ITS OCCURRENCE IN THIS PIT IS PUZZLING.</dd></dl> -<div class="pb" id="Page_78">78</div> -<p>The potsherds from pit <i>A</i> are from large vessels, and with one exception -they have lightly re-smoothed cordmarked exteriors. All sherds have been -smoothed inside. Of the three rimsherds recovered, two have rounded lips and -one a rather flat lip which, in the process of smoothing, received considerable -more burring over the outer edge than those with the rounded lip. All sherds -are hard and clay tempered. The color of these sherds is a muddy-brown or -brownish-grey. An exceptional sherd from pit <i>A</i> is tan in color, clay tempered -except for a few particles of grit, has a smooth interior and is decorated on the -outer surface with roulette or dentate stamping (<a href="#fig36">Fig. 1</a>, d).</p> -<p>Pit <i>B</i>, located 33 feet south of pit <i>A</i> in the same east bank was similar, but -only a small remnant of it remained after the usual vandalism. This pit was beneath -24 inches of overburden; it had a concentration of cultural fill that measured -6 inches in depth and the diameter had been approximately 30 inches. Small -lumps of fired limestone were scattered through the fill, which included two rimsherds -(<a href="#fig37">Fig. 2</a>, a and b) and 12 small body sherds. One rimsherd is evidently -from a miniature pot. It is smooth inside and out, grey in color, very hard and -without apparent tempering material. The other rimsherd is similar to those -from pit <i>A</i> which have the rounded lips. The body sherds seem to be from -rather large vessels which had cordmarked exterior surfaces and are clay tempered -except for one which was tempered with grit. One flake of white chert -showed usage.</p> -<p>Pit <i>C</i> was a small, poorly defined deposit of material foreign to the light -colored soil about it. The top of the deposit was 15 inches below the present -surface of the field. Three large cordmarked sherds and a number of small ones -were excavated. There were also bits of burned clay and a few flint chips. Nearby, -in the disturbed earth of the road, several large, grit tempered and cordmarked -sherds were recovered.</p> -<p>Pit <i>D</i> was exposed partly in the west bank of the road at its southern end. -In addition to the part of the pit exposed in the cutbank, the horizontal outline -of the pit could be traced on the surface of the graded road. Approximately half -the contents of the pit had been graded away. This pit, which excavation revealed -to be 20 inches deep, as marked by the dark fill, was covered by 18 inches -of light colored soil. The sides belled considerably and the flat, oval bottom -measured 4 feet northwest to southeast by 5 feet northeast to southwest.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_79">79</div> -<div class="img" id="fig37"> -<img src="images/p22.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="805" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 2. Pits B and D, Artifacts</p> -</div> -<dl class="undent pcap"><dt>PIT B POTTERY</dt> -<dd>a</dd> -<dd class="t">INTERIOR IS DARK GREY</dd> -<dd>b</dd> -<dd class="t">FRAGMENT OF A MINIATURE POT SURFACES ARE SMOOTH AND GREY</dd> -<dd class="t">NO TEMPERING VISIBLE.</dd> -<dt>SECTION OF CLAY RING</dt> -<dt>PERFORATED CANINE</dt> -<dt>CORDMARKED DISC OF TAN COLORED POTTERY</dt> -<dt>PROJECTILE POINTS ARE FROM FLAKES CHIPPED AROUND THE EDGES</dt> -<dt>a AND d. ARE OF PINK CHALCEDONY</dt> -<dt>FLINT FLAKE DRILL</dt></dl> -<div class="pb" id="Page_80">80</div> -<p>Over 150 potsherds were recovered; 17 were rims of vessels, nine are -sketched in <a href="#fig38">Figure 3</a>. With few exceptions, these rims were similar to those from -pits <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> and are from large vessels. They were cordmarked, very hard, and -are tempered with clay and some grit. Many sherds break squarely, others flake -badly and even crumble. From these potsherds, one vessel has been restored sufficiently -to give its characteristics (<a href="#fig39">Fig. 4</a>). The pot, of about 3 quarts capacity, is -8 inches high, 8 inches at its greatest diameter and is rather thin walled. It has -dark grey paste, is clay tempered, very hard and has fine vertical cordmarks over -the upper body with cordmarks at random below the shoulder. The smooth -interior has small angular impressions or punctates inside the lip, which is slightly -everted. This vessel, considerably different from the others at the site, is very -similar to one from Arnold-Research Cave which is 70 miles west in Callaway -County, Missouri (Shippee, 1966). The pot from the cave was shell tempered. -In a personal communication of April 13, 1959, Dr. James B. Griffin states that -in theory the pottery from this site can be compared to that from sites where -Canteen grit tempered cordmarked and perhaps Korando clay tempered cordmarked -material is recovered. Of the many sherds recovered from pit <i>D</i>, all are -cordmarked or brushed. One sherd is from a vessel with a thick conical base.</p> -<p>A baked clay object from pit <i>D</i> seems to be a section of a small ring (<a href="#fig37">Fig. 2</a>). -One unperforated disc of cordmarked pottery was found (<a href="#fig37">Fig. 2</a>). Three projectile -points were found (<a href="#fig37">Fig. 2</a>). These points were made from flakes struck -from cores. Two have only primary chipping around the perimeter; the third -has secondary chipping on one edge. Two of the points were made from a pale -pink chalcedony. Of the small number of flint flakes found, few show evidence -of use, but one had been modified to form a drill (<a href="#fig37">Fig. 2</a>). The perforated canine -of a dog or wolf was in the fill of this pit (<a href="#fig37">Fig. 2</a>). Two antler sections have -been altered; one by a cut which removed the tine and the other by cutting or -scraping to thin it. Bone scrap of fish and animals, mussel shells and burned -limestone fragments occurred in pit <i>D</i>. Of the considerable charcoal recovered -from pit <i>D</i>, a sample sent to Michigan was dated (M-620) at 930±100 years -B.P. or A.D. 1020±100 before 1950. The wood was from a white ash group, a -red oak group and hickory. Identification by R. Yarnell Nov. 21, 1962. Reported -by letter from George J. Armelagos Jan. 28, 1963.</p> -<p>Pit <i>E</i> contained one rimsherd similar to those numerous on the site, and 14 -body sherds, one of which was from a large vessel having a conoidal base. Three -sherds were from a miniature pot. Pit <i>E</i> was 24 feet south of pit <i>D</i> and on the -same west road bank. It could be defined below 19 inches of light colored overburden -and had a depth of 8 inches. A radiocarbon date for charcoal from pit <i>E</i> -is (M-621)—1180±100 B.P. or A.D. 770±100 before 1950. The charcoal was -from red oak and white oak groups, as identified by Richard Yarnell at the University -of Michigan.</p> -<div class="pb" id="Page_81">81</div> -<div class="img" id="fig38"> -<img src="images/p23.jpg" alt="" width="496" height="799" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 3. Pit D pottery</p> -</div> -<dl class="undent pcap"><dt>INTERIOR</dt> -<dt>IMPRESSIONS INSIDE LIP ARE BY A CORD WRAPPED ROD</dt> -<dt>INTERIOR</dt> -<dt>EXTERIOR OF THE LARGE RIMS HAVE VERTICAL CORDMARKS, LIP TO SHOULDER AND AT RANDOM BELOW.</dt> -<dt>SLIGHT RESMOOTHING IS EVIDENT, COLOR IS BROWN TO BLACK.</dt> -<dt>ALL PIT D RIMS HAVE CORDMARKED EXTERIORS</dt> -<dt>LIP AND INTERIOR ARE PREDOMINATELY SMOOTHED</dt> -<dt>SHERD INTERIOR IS ON RIGHT</dt></dl> -<div class="pb" id="Page_82">82</div> -<div class="img" id="fig39"> -<img src="images/p24.jpg" alt="" width="491" height="801" /> -<p class="pcap">Figure 4.</p> -</div> -<dl class="undent pcap"><dt>RESTORED FROM PIT D</dt> -<dd>SMALL DENTATE IMPRESSIONS ARE ON THE INSIDE OF THE LIP.</dd> -<dt>EXTERIOR</dt> -<dt>BRUSHED EXTERIOR</dt> -<dt>INTERIOR</dt> -<dt>SURFACE OF ROAD</dt></dl> -<div class="pb" id="Page_83">83</div> -<p>From the surface of the road there was collected three rimsherds, 20 body -sherds, bone scrap, and a hammerstone which had a pit in two of its flat faces. -Artifacts are reported to have been found on the surface of the field surrounding -this hilltop site, but we found scant evidence of occupation in the plowed soil. -This lack of surface material may be further evidence of considerable deposition -over the pits that were exposed in the roadway across the site.</p> -<p>Leonard Blake sent a copy of the original manuscript of this excavation to -Patrick J. Munson of the Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, -and Mr. Munson kindly submitted comparisons and comments on the 23SC50 -and Late Woodland ceramics in the American Bottoms. The following is from -his letter of June 15, 1966.</p> -<p>“The pottery shows similarities to both Korondo Cordmarked and what I -call “Early Bluff” (which includes part of what Griffin calls Canteen Cordmarked -and which conforms to part of Titterington’s Jersey Bluff focus). Korondo and -Early Bluff are definitely related in some way (probably regional variants of what -is basically the same cultural pattern) and your material therefore represents -still another variant of this same pattern.</p> -<p>The comparisons and contrasts can best be illuminated in the following -table:</p> -<table class="center"> -<tr class="th"><th> </th><th>Korondo </th><th>Early Bluff </th><th>St. Charles</th></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Vessel Shape </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c">x</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Mostly Cordmarked </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c">x</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Mostly Sherd Tempered </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c"> </td><td class="c">x</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Mostly Grit Tempered </td><td class="c"> </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c"></td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Squared Lip </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c"> </td><td class="c"></td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Rounded, “sloppy” lip </td><td class="c"> </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c">x</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Interior Lip Cord Wrapped Stick stamp </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c">x</td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Interior Lip plain stamp </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c"></td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Exterior Lip plain stamp </td><td class="c"> </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c"></td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Vertical Lip plain stamp </td><td class="c"> </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c"></td></tr> -<tr><td class="l">Undecorated Lip </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c">x </td><td class="c">x</td></tr> -</table> -<p>As such, your material seems about as similar to one as the other, every attribute -being shared with either Korondo or Early Bluff, or with both.</p> -<p>Also your radiocarbon dates, or at least the two earliest ones, conform quite -well. Dr. Robert Hall, now of the University of Chicago, has two dates for a -Korondo site in the southern part of the American Bottoms (Stolle Quarry) -AD-700 and 900, and by a process of elimination, Early Bluff in the northern -portion of the Bottoms must date pre-850. (Korondo is found in the southern -part of the Bottoms and south; Early Bluff is in the northern portion and north.) -Your one dentate stamped sherd (<a href="#fig36">Fig. 1</a>) is probably Naples Dentate Stamped, -and as such is surely an accidental inclusion—I doubt if this Middle Woodland -type was made later than A.D. 400 at the latest. Also the largest projectile point -<span class="pb" id="Page_84">84</span> -from pit <i>D</i> looks like a sloppy Snyders Point, again a Middle Woodland type -and probably an accident (or a specimen collected by the Late Woodland peoples). -The smallest point from the pit is probably a Late Woodland Koster -Point (cf. Perino, 1963, Central States Arch. Jour., Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 95-100).</p> -<p>An attribute you might include in your pottery description is the direction -of twist of cords used in making the cordmarkings; “S” twist (right hand) and -“Z” twist (left hand)—but remember, the impressions on the pottery are negative, -so the <i>cord was the opposite of the impressions that you see</i>. I found the percentage -of this attribute quite significant in separating Early Bluff from Late Bluff.”</p> -<h3 id="c21">CONCLUSION</h3> -<p>The three days of salvage archaeology at this site at St. Charles, Missouri -were well rewarded by the information gained and especially by the recovery of -charcoal associated with the artifacts in the pits. The three radiocarbon dates, -with the exception of the late one, must be of considerable value to archaeologists -investigating sites in the Midwest, and especially those in the vicinity of -St. Louis and the American Bottoms. As for the site, the writer understands that -it is totally built over, but isolated finds during construction work at the location -could provide further important knowledge of the prehistoric Indians who -inhabited the site. The passage of 16 years since the initial investigation, before -this report could be concluded, is further proof that the archaeologist’s job is a -difficult one to pursue, and it is only by the persistent endeavor and cooperation -of the various persons interested that anything is accomplished.</p> -<h2 id="c22"><span class="small">FOOTNOTES</span></h2> -<div class="fnblock"><div class="fndef"><a class="fn" id="fn_1" href="#fr_1">[1]</a>Parentheses indicate estimated measurement -</div><div class="fndef"><a class="fn" id="fn_2" href="#fr_2">[2]</a>Based on data from Table 34, Myers and Bass (n.d.) -</div> -</div> -<h2>Transcriber’s Notes</h2> -<ul> -<li>Silently corrected a few typos.</li> -<li>Retained publication information from the printed edition: this eBook is public-domain in the country of publication.</li> -<li>In the text versions only, text in <i>italics</i> is delimited by _underscores_.</li> -</ul> - - - - - - - -<pre> - - - - - -End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Missouri Archaeologist, Volume 34, -No. 1 and 2, December 1972, by Various - -*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE MISSOURI ARCHAEOLOGIST *** - -***** This file should be named 63219-h.htm or 63219-h.zip ***** -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: - http://www.gutenberg.org/6/3/2/1/63219/ - - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions -will be renamed. - -Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no -one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation -(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without -permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, -set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to -copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to -protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project -Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you -charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you -do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the -rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose -such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and -research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do -practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is -subject to the trademark license, especially commercial -redistribution. - - - -*** START: FULL LICENSE *** - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project -Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at -http://gutenberg.org/license). - - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy -all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. -If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the -terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or -entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement -and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" -or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the -collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an -individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are -located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from -copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative -works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg -are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project -Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by -freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of -this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with -the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by -keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project -Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in -a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check -the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement -before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or -creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project -Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning -the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United -States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate -access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently -whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, -copied or distributed: - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived -from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is -posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied -and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees -or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work -with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the -work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 -through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the -Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or -1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional -terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked -to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the -permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any -word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or -distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than -"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version -posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), -you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a -copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon -request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other -form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided -that - -- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is - owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he - has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the - Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments - must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you - prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax - returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and - sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the - address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to - the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." - -- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or - destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium - and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of - Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any - money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days - of receipt of the work. - -- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set -forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from -both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael -Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the -Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm -collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain -"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or -corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual -property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a -computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by -your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with -your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with -the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a -refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity -providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to -receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy -is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further -opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER -WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO -WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. -If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the -law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be -interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by -the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any -provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance -with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, -promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, -harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, -that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do -or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm -work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any -Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. - - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers -including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists -because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from -people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. -To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 -and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. - - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive -Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at -http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent -permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. -Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered -throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at -809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email -business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact -information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official -page at http://pglaf.org - -For additional contact information: - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To -SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any -particular state visit http://pglaf.org - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. -To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate - - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm -concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared -with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project -Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. - - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. -unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily -keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. - - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: - - http://www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. - - -</pre> - -</body> -</html> diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 12b5ced..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/cover.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p0.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p0.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 721e8ad..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p0.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p01.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p01.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 9beb9ce..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p01.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p01b.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p01b.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 2c45b41..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p01b.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p01c.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p01c.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index b542d00..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p01c.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p02.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p02.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 8dbbc1e..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p02.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p02a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p02a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index db480c6..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p02a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p03.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p03.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 8c62cd9..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p03.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p03a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p03a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index dcf6e14..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p03a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p03b.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p03b.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 670d92f..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p03b.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p04.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p04.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index f7aa053..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p04.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p04a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p04a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 259ba45..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p04a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p05.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p05.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 9ab3951..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p05.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p05a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p05a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 793258e..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p05a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p06.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p06.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index c08d1b0..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p06.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p06a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p06a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index bbeb799..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p06a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p07.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p07.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 1e1b3c1..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p07.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p07a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p07a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index b65137f..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p07a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p08.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p08.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 4c795e6..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p08.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p08a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p08a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 3ae47e8..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p08a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p09.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p09.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 98533af..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p09.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p09a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p09a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index d382c18..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p09a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p10.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p10.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 4d4c71d..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p10.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p10a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p10a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index d06458e..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p10a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p11.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p11.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 82b5e1f..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p11.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p11a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p11a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 92800bf..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p11a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p12.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p12.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 07807db..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p12.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p13.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p13.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 03bcca1..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p13.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p13a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p13a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index a1d6e07..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p13a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p14.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p14.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 2800c8e..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p14.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p15.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p15.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 3ecb420..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p15.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p15a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p15a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 478f27d..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p15a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p16.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p16.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 5463a3e..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p16.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p17.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p17.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 6e3306f..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p17.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p17a.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p17a.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 0271b18..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p17a.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p18.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p18.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 7761308..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p18.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p19.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p19.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 38cadbb..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p19.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p20.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p20.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index dc39f17..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p20.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p21.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p21.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 9a4d50f..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p21.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p22.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p22.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 66645e2..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p22.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p23.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p23.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 86442a4..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p23.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/p24.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/p24.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index f5f7830..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/p24.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/63219-h/images/spine.jpg b/old/63219-h/images/spine.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 080a0de..0000000 --- a/old/63219-h/images/spine.jpg +++ /dev/null |
