summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/62867-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/62867-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/62867-0.txt9627
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 9627 deletions
diff --git a/old/62867-0.txt b/old/62867-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index d73ecdc..0000000
--- a/old/62867-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,9627 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of Memories of a Hostess, by
-Mark Antony De Wolfe Howe and Mrs. James T. (Annie) Fields
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
-other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
-the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
-to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
-
-Title: Memories of a Hostess
- A Chronicle of Eminent Friendships, Drawn Chiefly from the
- Diaries of Mrs. James T. Fields
-
-Author: Mark Antony De Wolfe Howe
- Mrs. James T. (Annie) Fields
-
-Release Date: August 6, 2020 [EBook #62867]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MEMORIES OF A HOSTESS ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by ellinora and the Online Distributed Proofreading
-Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from
-images generously made available by The Internet
-Archive/American Libraries.)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-MEMORIES OF A HOSTESS
-
-
-
-
-_By the Same Author_
-
-
-BIOGRAPHICAL
-
- American Bookmen (1898)
- Phillips Brooks (in “Beacon Biographies,” 1899)
- Life and Letters of George Bancroft (1908)
- Life and Labors of Bishop Hare (1911)
- Letters of Charles Eliot Norton (with Sara Norton, 1913)
- George von Lengerke Meyer: His Life and Public Services (1919)
- Memoirs of the Harvard Dead (1920, 1921, ——)
-
-HISTORICAL
-
- Boston, the Place and the People (1903)
- Boston Common: Scenes from Four Centuries (1910)
- The Boston Symphony Orchestra (1914)
- The Humane Society of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (1918)
- The Atlantic Monthly and Its Makers (1919)
-
-VERSE
-
- Shadows (1897)
- Harmonies (1909)
-
-EDITED
-
- The Beacon Biographies (31 volumes, 1899-1910)
- The Memory of Lincoln (1899)
- Home Letters of General Sherman (1909)
- Lines of Battle, by Henry Howard Brownell (1912)
- The Harvard Volunteers in Europe (1916)
- A Scholar’s Letters to a Young Lady (1920)
-
-
-
-
-[Illustration: MRS. FIELDS]
-
-
-
-
- MEMORIES OF A HOSTESS
-
- A CHRONICLE OF
- EMINENT FRIENDSHIPS
-
- DRAWN CHIEFLY FROM THE DIARIES OF
- MRS. JAMES T. FIELDS
-
- BY
- M. A. DEWOLFE HOWE
-
- “_I stay a little longer, as one stays_
- _To cover up the embers that still burn_”
-
- [Illustration]
-
- _WITH ILLUSTRATIONS_
-
- THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY PRESS
- BOSTON
-
- COPYRIGHT, 1922, BY
- M. A. DEWOLFE HOWE
-
- First Impression, October, 1922
- Second Impression, December, 1922
-
- PRINTED IN THE
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS
-
-
- I. PRELIMINARY 3
-
- II. THE HOUSE AND THE HOSTESS 6
-
- III. DR. HOLMES, THE FRIEND AND NEIGHBOR 17
-
- IV. CONCORD AND CAMBRIDGE VISITORS 53
-
- V. WITH DICKENS IN AMERICA 135
-
- VI. STAGE FOLK AND OTHERS 196
-
- VII. SARAH ORNE JEWETT 281
-
-
-
-
-ILLUSTRATIONS
-
-
- MRS. FIELDS _Frontispiece_
- From an early photograph
-
- A NOTE OF ACCEPTANCE 9
- Autograph of Julia Ward Howe
-
- THE OFFENDING DEDICATION 15
- From First Edition of Hawthorne’s “Our Old Home”
-
- AN EARLY PHOTOGRAPH OF DR. HOLMES 18
-
- REDUCED FACSIMILE OF DR. HOLMES’S 1863 ADDRESS TO THE ALUMNI OF
- HARVARD 23
-
- FROM THE PLAY-BILL OF THE NIGHT OF DR. HOLMES’S “GREAT ROUND FAT
- TEAR” 24
- (Shaw Theatre Collection, Harvard College Library)
-
- FACSIMILE OF THE CONCLUSION OF ULTIMUS SMITH’S DECLARATION 26
-
- MRS. FIELDS 32
- From a crayon portrait made by Rowse in 1863
-
- FIELDS, THE MAN OF BOOKS AND FRIENDSHIPS 34
-
- LOUIS AGASSIZ 48
-
- HAWTHORNE IN 1857 54
-
- FROM A LETTER OF HAWTHORNE’S AFTER A VISIT TO CHARLES STREET 61
-
- EMERSON 86
- From the Marble Statue by Daniel Chester French in the
- Concord Public Library
-
- A CORNER OF THE CHARLES STREET LIBRARY 98
-
- FROM A NOTE OF EMERSON’S TO MRS. FIELDS 100
-
- FACSIMILE OF AUTOGRAPH INSCRIPTION ON A PHOTOGRAPH OF ROWSE’S
- CRAYON PORTRAIT OF LOWELL GIVEN TO FIELDS 106
-
- JAMES RUSSELL LOWELL 106
- From the Crayon Portrait by Rowse in the Harvard College
- Library
-
- FACSIMILE OF LOWELL’S “BULLDOG AND TERRIER” SONNET 121
-
- HENRY WADSWORTH LONGFELLOW 124
- From a Photograph taken in middle life
-
- FROM A NOTE OF “DEAR WHITTIER” TO MRS. FIELDS 130
-
- PROPOSED DEDICATION OF WHITTIER’S “AMONG THE HILLS” TO MRS.
- FIELDS 132
-
- CHARLES DICKENS 136
- From a portrait by Francis Alexander, for many years in the
- Fields house, and now in the Boston Museum of Fine Arts
-
- “THE TWO CHARLES’S,” DICKENS AND FECHTER 140
- (Shaw Theatre Collection, Harvard College Library)
-
- REDUCED FACSIMILE OF DICKENS’S DIRECTIONS, PRESERVED AMONG THE
- FIELDS PAPERS, FOR THE BREWING OF PLEASANT BEVERAGES 147
-
- FACSIMILE PLAY-BILL OF “THE FROZEN DEEP,” WITH DICKENS AS
- ACTOR-MANAGER 188
- (Shaw Theatre Collection, Harvard College Library)
-
- FACSIMILE NOTE FROM DICKENS TO FIELDS 192
-
- JAMES T. FIELDS AT FIFTEEN 196
- From a drawing by a French Painter
-
- FACSIMILE NOTE FROM BOOTH TO MRS. FIELDS 201
-
- BOOTH AS HAMLET 202
-
- JEFFERSON IN THE BETROTHAL SCENE OF “RIP VAN WINKLE” 208
-
- A NAST CARTOON OF DICKENS AND FECHTER 210
- (Shaw Theatre Collection, Harvard College Library)
-
- JAMES E. MURDOCK AND WILLIAM WARREN 218
-
- CHARLOTTE CUSHMAN: FROM A CRAYON PORTRAIT 220
- (Shaw Theatre Collection, Harvard College Library)
-
- RISTORI AND FANNY KEMBLE 222
- The photograph of Fanny Kemble was taken in Philadelphia
- in 1863
-
- CHRISTINE NILSSON AS OPHELIA 226
-
- FACSIMILE LETTER FROM WILLIAM MORRIS HUNT TO FIELDS 231
-
- FACSIMILE PAGE FROM AN EARLY LETTER OF BRET HARTE’S 235
-
- BRET HARTE AND MARK TWAIN 242
- From early photographs
-
- FACSIMILE VERSES AND LETTER FROM MARK TWAIN TO FIELDS 248-9
-
- CHARLES SUMNER 258
-
- FROM A LETTER OF EDWARD LEAR’S TO FIELDS 279
-
- SARAH ORNE JEWETT 282
-
- THE LIBRARY IN CHARLES STREET 284
- Mrs. Fields at the Window, Miss Jewett at the right
-
- AN AUTOGRAPH COPY OF MRS. FIELDS’S “FLAMMANTIS MŒNIA MUNDI”
- BEFORE ITS FINAL REVISION 287
-
- MRS. FIELDS ON HER MANCHESTER PIAZZA 288
-
- MISTRAL, MASTER OF “BOUFFLO BEEL” 294
-
- REDUCED FACSIMILE FROM LETTER OF HENRY JAMES 299
-
-(_Most of the photographs reproduced are in the collections of the
-Boston Athenæum and the Harvard College Library, to which grateful
-acknowledgments are made._)
-
-
-
-
-MEMORIES OF A HOSTESS
-
-
-
-
-I
-
-PRELIMINARY
-
-
-In the years immediately before the death of Mrs. James T. Fields, on
-January 5, 1915, she spoke to me more than once of her intention to
-place in my possession a cabinet of old papers—journals of her own,
-letters from a host of correspondents, odds and ends of manuscript and
-print—which stood in a dark corner of a small reception-room near the
-front door of her house in Charles Street, Boston. On her death this
-intention was found to have been confirmed in writing. It was also made
-clear that Mrs. Fields had no desire that her own life should be made a
-subject of record—“unless,” she wrote, “for some reason not altogether
-connected with myself.” Such a reason is abundantly suggested in her
-records of the friends she was constantly seeing through the years
-covered by the journals. These friends were men and women whose books
-have made them the friends of the English-speaking world, and a better
-knowledge of them would justify any amplification of the records of
-their lives. In this process the figure of their friend and hostess in
-Charles Street must inevitably reveal itself—not as the subject of a
-biography, but as a central animating presence, a focus of sympathy and
-understanding, which seemed to make a single phenomenon out of a long
-series and wide variety of friendships and hospitalities.
-
-The “blue books”—more than fifty in number—which Mrs. Fields used for
-the journals have already yielded many pages of valuable record to her
-own books, especially “James T. Fields: Biographical Notes and Personal
-Sketches” (1881), and “Authors and Friends” (1896); also even, here and
-there, to Mr. Fields’s “Yesterdays with Authors” (1871). Yet she left
-unprinted much that is both picturesque and illuminating: so many of the
-persons mentioned in the journal were still living or had but recently
-died when her books were written. There are, besides, many passages used
-in a fragmentary way, which may now with propriety be given complete.
-
-Into these manuscript journals, then, I propose to dip afresh—not
-with the purpose of passing in a miscellaneous review all the friends
-who crossed the threshold of the Charles Street house in a fixed
-period of time, but rather in pursuit of what seems a more promising
-quest—namely, to consider separate friends and groups of friends in
-turn; to assemble from the journals passages that have to do with
-them; to supplement these by drawing now and then upon the old cabinet
-for a letter from this or that friend to Mr. or Mrs. Fields, and thus
-to step back across the years into a time and scene of refreshing
-remembrance. Many a friend, many a friendship, must be left untouched.
-In the processes of selection, figures of more than local significance
-will receive the chief consideration. In passages relating to one
-person, allusions to many others, sometimes treated separately in other
-passages, will often be found, for the friendships with one and another
-were constantly overlapping and interlocking. Bits of record of no
-obviously great importance will be included, not because they or the
-subjects of them are taken with undue seriousness, but merely that a
-vanished society, interesting in itself to those who care for the past
-and doubly interesting as material for a study in contrasts with the
-present, may have again its “day in court.” When Fields was publishing
-his reminiscences of Hawthorne, Lowell wrote to him: “Be sure and don’t
-leave anything out because it seems trifling, for it is out of these
-trifles only that it is possible to reconstruct character sometimes, if
-not always”; and he commended especially the hitting of “the true channel
-between the Charybdis of reticence, and the Scylla of gossip.” Under
-sailing orders of this nature, self-imposed, I hope to proceed.
-
-“Another added to my cloud of witnesses,” wrote Mrs. Fields in her
-journal, on hearing, in 1867, that Forceythe Willson had died. Nearly
-fifty years of life then remained to the diarist, though she continued to
-keep her diary with regularity for hardly ten. Before her own death the
-cloud of witnesses was infinitely extended. Yet new friends constantly
-stood ready to fill, as best they might, the gaps that were left by the
-old. It is not the new who will appear in the following pages, but those
-with whom Mrs. Fields herself must now be numbered.
-
-
-
-
-II
-
-THE HOUSE AND THE HOSTESS
-
-
-The fact that Henry James, in “The American Scene,” published in 1907,
-and again in an article which appeared in the “Atlantic Monthly” and the
-“Cornhill Magazine” in July, 1915, has set down in his own ultimate words
-his memories of Mrs. Fields and her Boston abode would be the despair
-of anyone attempting a similar task—were it not that quotation remains
-an unprohibited practice. In “The American Scene” he evokes from the
-past “the Charles Street ghosts,” and gives them their local habitation:
-“Here, behind the effaced anonymous door”—a more literal-minded realist
-might have noted that a vestibule-door contributed the only effacement
-and anonymity—“was the little ark of the modern deluge, here still the
-long drawing-room that looks over the water and towards the sunset, with
-a seat for every visiting shade, from far-away Thackeray down, and relics
-and tokens so thick on its walls as to make it positively, in all the
-town, the votive temple to memory.” In his “Atlantic” and “Cornhill”
-article he refers to the house, in a phrase at which Mrs. Fields would
-have smiled, as “the waterside museum of the Fieldses,” and to them as
-“addicted to every hospitality and every benevolence, addicted to the
-cultivation of talk and wit and to the ingenious multiplication of such
-ties as could link the upper half of the title-page with the lower”;
-he pays tribute to “their vivacity, their curiosity, their mobility,
-the felicity of their instinct for any manner of gathered relic,
-remnant, or tribute”; and in Mrs. Fields herself, surviving her husband
-for many years, he notes “the personal beauty of her younger years,
-long retained and not even at the end of such a stretch of life quite
-lost; the exquisite native tone and mode of appeal, which anciently we
-perhaps thought a little ‘precious,’ but from which the distinctive and
-the preservative were in time to be snatched, a greater extravagance
-supervening; the signal sweetness of temper and lightness of tact.”
-
-There is one more of Henry James’s remarks about Mrs. Fields that must
-be quoted, “All her implications,” he says, “were gay, since no one so
-finely sentimental could be noted as so humorous; just as no feminine
-humor was perhaps ever so unmistakingly directed, and no state of
-amusement, amid quantities of reminiscence, perhaps ever so merciful.”
-Mirth and mercy do not always, like righteousness and peace, kiss each
-other. In Mrs. Fields the capacity for incapacitating laughter was such
-that I cannot help recalling one occasion, near the end of her life,
-when an attempt to tell a certain story—of which I remember nothing but
-that it had to do with a horse—involved her in such merriment that after
-repeated efforts to reach its “point,” she was forced to abandon the
-endeavor. What I cannot recall in a single instance, in the excellent
-telling of innumerable anecdotes, is unkindness, in word or suggestion,
-toward the persons involved in them. Mr. James did well to include this
-item in his enumeration of Mrs. Fields’s qualities.
-
-Through all his lenses of memory and phrase he brought so vividly to
-one’s own vision the Mrs. Fields a younger generation had known that,
-on reading what he had written, I wrote to him in England, then nearly
-ending its first year in the war, and must have said that his pages would
-help me, at some future day, to deal with these of my own, now at last
-taking form. Thus, in part, he replied:—
-
- _July 20th, 1915_
-
- Your appreciation reached me, alas, but through the most
- muffling and deadening thickness of our unspeakable actuality
- here. It was to try and get out of that a little that I wrote
- my paper—in the most difficult and defeating conditions, which
- seemed to me to make it, with my heart so utterly elsewhere,
- a deplorably make-believe attempt. Therefore if it _had_ any
- virtue, there must still be some in my poor old stump of a pen.
- Yes, the pipe of peace is a thing one has, amid our storm and
- stress, to listen very hard for when it twitters, from afar,
- outside; and when you shall pipe it over your exhibition of
- dear Mrs. Fields’s relics and documents I shall respond to your
- doing so with whatever attention may then be possible to me. We
- are not detached here, in your enviable way—but just exactly so
- must we therefore make some small effort to escape, even into
- whatever fatuity of illusion, to keep our heads above water at
- all. That in short is the history of my “Cornhill” scrap.
-
-[Illustration: _A Note of Acceptance_]
-
-The time into which Henry James escaped by “piping” of Mrs. Fields has
-now grown far more remote than the added span of the last seven years,
-merely as years, could have made it. Remote enough it seemed to him
-when, at the end of his reminiscences of the Fieldses, he recalled a
-small “feast” in the Charles Street dining-room at which Mrs. Julia
-Ward Howe—it must have been about 1906—rose and declaimed, “a little
-quaveringly, but ever so gallantly, that ‘Battle Hymn of the Republic’
-which she caused to be chanted half a century before and still could
-accompany with a real breadth of gesture, her great clap of hands and
-indication of the complementary step, on the triumphant line, ‘Be swift
-my hands to welcome him, be jubilant my feet!’”
-
-Now it fell to my lot that night, as perhaps the youngest of the party,
-to convoy Mrs. Howe across two wintry bits of sidewalk into the carriage
-which bore her to and from the memorable dinner-party, and to accompany
-her on each of the little journeys. Quite as clear in my memory as her
-recitation of the “Battle Hymn” was the note of finality in her voice,
-quite free from unkindness, as she settled down for the return drive to
-her house in Beacon Street, far from a towering figure, and announced
-in the darkness: “Annie Fields has shrunk.” The hostess we were leaving
-and the guest some fifteen years her senior, and nearing ninety with
-what seemed an immortally youthful spirit, appear, when those words
-are recalled, as they must have been before either was touched by the
-diminishing hand of age; and the house whose door had just closed upon
-us—a house more recently obliterated to make room for a monstrous
-garage—came back as the scene of many a gathering of which the little
-feast described by Henry James was but a type.
-
-Early in January of 1915 this door, which through a period of sixty
-years had opened upon extraordinary hospitality, was finally closed.
-Since 1866 it had borne the number 148. Ten years earlier, in 1856, when
-the house was first occupied by James T. Fields, afterwards identified
-with the publishing firms of Ticknor and Fields, and Fields, Osgood and
-Company, it was numbered 37, Charles Street. This Boston man of books
-and friendships, who before his death in 1881 was to become widely known
-as publisher, editor, lecturer, and writer, had married, in 1850, Eliza
-Josephine Willard, a daughter of Simon Willard, Jr., of the name still
-honorably associated with the even passage of time. She died within a
-few months, and in November of 1854 he married her cousin, Annie Adams,
-not yet twenty years old, the beautiful daughter of Dr. Zabdiel Boylston
-Adams. For those who knew Mrs. Fields toward the end of her four score
-and more years, it was far easier to see in her charming face and
-presence the exquisite, eager young woman of the mid-nineteenth century
-than to detect in the Charles Street of 1915, of which she was the last
-inhabitant of her own kind, any resemblance to the delightful street of
-family dwellings, many of them looking out over the then unfilled “Back
-Bay,” to which she had come about sixty years before. The Fieldses had
-lived here but a few years when, in 1859, Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes—with
-the “Autocrat” a year behind him and the “Professor” a year ahead—became
-their neighbor at 21, subsequently 164, Charles Street. On the other side
-of them, nearer Beacon Street, John A. Andrew, the great war governor of
-Massachusetts, was a friend and neighbor. Across the way, for a time,
-lived Thomas Bailey Aldrich. In hillside streets near by dwelt many
-persons of congenial tastes, whose work and character contributed greatly
-to making Boston what it was through the second half of the last century.
-
-The distinctive flavor of the neighborhood derived nothing more from
-any of its households than from that of Mr. and Mrs. Fields. Their
-dining—room and drawing-room[1]—that green assembling-place of books,
-pictures, music, persons, associations, all to be treasured—were the
-natural resort, not only of the whole notable local company of writers
-whose publisher was also their true and valued friend, but, besides, of
-many of the eminent visitors to Boston, of the type represented most
-conspicuously by Charles Dickens. After the death of Mr. Fields there was
-far more than a tradition carried on in the Charles Street house. Not
-merely for what it had meant, but for all that the gracious personality
-of Mrs. Fields caused it to go on meaning, it continued through her
-lifetime—extending beyond that of Miss Sarah Orne Jewett, for so many
-years of Mrs. Fields’s widowhood her delightful sister-hostess—the
-resort of older and younger friends, whose present thus drew a constant
-enrichment from the past.
-
-It was not till 1863, nearly ten years after her marriage, that Mrs.
-Fields, who had kept a diary during a visit to Europe in 1859-60 with
-her husband, and for other brief periods, applied herself regularly
-to this practice, maintained through 1876, and thereafter renewed but
-intermittently. She wrote on the cover of the first slender volume: “No.
-1. Journal of Literary Events and Glimpses of Interesting People.” A
-few of its earliest pages, revealing its general purpose and character,
-may well precede the passages relating, in accordance with the plan
-already indicated, to individual friends and groups of friends. In the
-first pages of all, on which Mrs. Fields built a few sentences for her
-“Biographical Notes,” I find:—
-
- _July 26, 1863._—What a strange history this literary life in
- America at the present day would make. An editor and publisher
- at once, and at this date, stands at a confluence of tides
- where all humanity seems to surge up in little waves; some
- larger than the rest (every seventh it may be) dashes up in
- music to which the others love to listen; or some springing
- to a great height retire to tell the story of their flight to
- those who stay below.
-
- Mr. Longfellow is quietly at Nahant. His translation of Dante
- is finished, but will not be completely published until the
- Year 1865, that being the 600th anniversary since the death of
- the great Italian. Dr. Holmes was never in healthier mood than
- at present. His oration delivered before a large audience upon
- the Fourth of July this year places him high in the rank of
- native orators. It is a little doubtful how soon he will feel
- like writing again. He has contributed much during the last two
- years to the “Atlantic” magazine. He may well take a temporary
- rest.
-
- Mr. Lowell is not well. He is now travelling. Mr. Hawthorne
- is in Concord. He has just completed a volume of English
- Sketches of which a few have been printed in the “Atlantic
- Monthly.” He will dedicate the volume to Franklin Pierce, the
- Democrat—a most unpopular thing just now, but friendship of the
- purest stimulates him, and the ruin in prospect for his book
- because of this resolve does not move him from his purpose.
- Such adherence is indeed noble. Hawthorne requires all that
- popularity can give him in a pecuniary way for the support of
- his family.
-
- The “Atlantic Monthly” is at present an interesting feature of
- America. Purely literary, it has nevertheless a subscription
- list, daily increasing, of 32,000. Of course the editor’s
- labors are not slight. We have been waiting for Mr. Emerson
- to publish his new volume containing his address upon Henry
- Thoreau; but he is careful of words and finds many to be
- considered again and again, until it is almost impossible to
- extort a manuscript from his hands. He has written but little,
- of late.
-
- _July 28._—George William Curtis has done at least one great
- good work. He has by a gentle but continuously brave pressure
- transformed the “Harper’s Weekly,” which was semi-Secession,
- into an anti-slavery and Republican journal. The last issue is
- covered with pictures as well as words which tend to ameliorate
- the condition of the colored race. Mr. Curtis’s own house
- at Staten Island has been threatened by the mob; therefore
- his wife and children came last week to New England. I fear
- the death of Colonel Shaw, her brother, commanding the 54th
- Massachusetts (colored infantry), will induce them to return
- home. His death is one of our severest strokes.
-
- _July 31, 1863._—We have been in Concord this week, making
- a short visit at the Hawthornes’. He has just finished his
- volume of English Sketches, about to be dedicated to Franklin
- Pierce. It is a beautiful incident in Hawthorne’s life, the
- determination at all hazards to dedicate this book to his
- friend. Mr. P.’s politics at present shut him away from the
- faith of patriots, but Hawthorne has loved him since college
- days and he will not relent.[2] Mrs. Hawthorne is the stay of
- the house.
-
- The wood-work, the tables and chairs and pedestals, are all
- ornamented by her artistic hand or what she has prompted her
- children to do. Una is full of exquisite maidenhood. Julian was
- away, but his beautiful illuminations lay upon the table. The
- one illustrating a portion of King Arthur’s address to Queen
- Guinevere (Tennyson) was remarkably fine.
-
-[Illustration: _The Offending Dedication_]
-
-All this takes one back into a past sufficiently remote. The 1859-60
-diary of travel achieves the more remarkable spectacle of Mrs. Fields
-in conversation with Leigh Hunt less than two months before he died,
-and reporting the very words of Shelley to this friend of his. They may
-be found in the “Biographical Notes” published by Mrs. Fields after
-her husband’s death. Shelley says, “Hunt, we write _love_-songs; why
-shouldn’t we write hate-songs?” And Hunt, recalling the remark, adds,
-“He said he meant to some day, poor fellow.” Perhaps one of his subjects
-would have been the second Mrs. Godwin, for, according to Hunt, he
-disliked her particularly, believing her untrue, and used to say that
-when he was obliged to dine with her “he would lean back in his chair
-and languish into hate.” Then, wrote Mrs. Fields, “he said no one could
-describe Shelley. He always was to him as if he came from the planet
-Mercury, bearing a winged wand tipped with flame.” It is now an even
-century since the death of Shelley, and here we find one of the older
-generation of our own time talking, as it were, with him at but a single
-remove. Almost the reader is persuaded to ask of Mrs. Fields herself,
-“Ah, did you once see Shelley plain?”
-
-Thus from the records of bygone years many remembered figures might be
-summoned; but the evocations already made will suffice to indicate the
-point of vantage at which Mrs. Fields stood as a diarist, and to set the
-scene for the display of separate friendships.
-
-
-
-
-III
-
-DR. HOLMES, THE FRIEND AND NEIGHBOR[3]
-
-
-If any familiar face should appear at the front of the procession that
-constantly crossed the threshold of 148, Charles Street, it should be
-that of Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, for many years a near neighbor, and
-to the end of his life a devoted visitor and friend. Here, then, is an
-unpublished letter written from his summer retreat while Fields was still
-actively associated with the “Old Corner Bookstore” of Ticknor, Reed, and
-Fields, and in the year before his marriage with Annie Adams:—
-
- PITTSFIELD, _Sept. 6th, 1853_
-
- MY DEAR MR. FIELDS:—
-
- Thank you for the four volumes, and the authors of three of
- them through you. You did not remember that I patronized you to
- the extent of Aleck before I came up; never mind, I can shove
- it round among the young farmeresses and perhaps help to work
- off the eleventh thousand of the most illustrious of all the
- Smiths.
-
- I shall write to Hillard soon. I have been reading his book
- half the time today and with very great pleasure. I am
- delighted with the plan of it—practical information such as
- the traveller that is to be or that has been wishes for, with
- poetical description enough to keep the imagination alive,
- and sound American thought to give it manly substance. It is
- anything but a _flash_ book, but I have not the slightest doubt
- that it will have a permanent and very high place in travelling
- literature. Many things have pleased me exceedingly,—when I
- have read a little more I shall try to tell him what pleases me
- _most_,—as I suppose like most authors he likes as many points
- for his critical self-triangulation as will come unasked for.
-
- Hawthorne’s book has been not devoured, but _bolted_ by my
- children. I have not yet had a chance at it, but I don’t doubt
- I shall read it with as much gusto as they, when my turn comes.
- When you write to him, thank him if you please for me, for I
- suppose he will hardly expect any formal acknowledgment.
-
- I bloomed out into a large smile of calm delight on opening
- the delicate little “Epistle Dedicatory” wherein your name is
- embalmed. I cannot remember that our friend has tried that pace
- before; he wrote some pleasing lines I remember to Longfellow
- on the ship in which he was to sail when he went to Europe some
- years—a good many—ago.
-
- Don’t be too proud! Wait until you get a prose dedication from
- a poet,—if you have not got one already,—and then consider
- yourself immortal.
-
- Yours most truly,
-
- O. W. HOLMES
-
-[Illustration: AN EARLY PHOTOGRAPH OF DR. HOLMES]
-
-This letter contains several provocations to curiosity. “Aleck, ... the
-most illustrious of all the Smiths,” was obviously Alexander Smith,
-the Scottish poet of enormous but strictly contemporaneous vogue, in
-whom the English reviewers of the time detected a kinship to Tennyson,
-Keats, Shelley, and Shakespeare. George S. Hillard’s new book was “Six
-Months in Italy,” and Hawthorne’s, “not devoured, but bolted” by the
-Holmes children, was “Tanglewood Tales.” The “delicate little ‘Epistle
-Dedicatory’” has been found elusive.
-
-From this early letter of Dr. Holmes a seven-league step may be taken
-to a passage in a diary Mrs. Fields was writing in 1860,—the year
-following the removal of the Holmes household from Montgomery Place to
-Charles Street,—before her long unbroken series of journals began. The
-occasion described was one of those frequent breakfasts in the Fields
-dining-room, which bespoke, in the term of a later poet, the “wide
-unhaste” of the period. Of the guests, N. P. Willis was then at the top
-of his distinction as a New York editor; George T. Davis, a lawyer of
-Greenfield, Massachusetts, afterwards of Portland, Maine, a classmate
-of Dr. Holmes, was reputed one of the most charming table-companions
-and wits of his day: the tributes to his memory at a meeting of the
-Massachusetts Historical Society after his death in 1877 stir one’s envy
-of his contemporaries; George Washington Greene of Rhode Island was
-perhaps equally known as the friend of Longfellow and as the grandson and
-biographer of General Nathanael Greene; Whipple was, of course, Edwin P.
-Whipple, essayist and lecturer; the household of three was completed by
-Mrs. Fields’s sister, Miss Lizzie Adams.
-
- _Thursday, September 21, 1860._—Equinoctial clearing after a
- stormy night and morning. Willis came to breakfast, and Holmes
- and George T. Davis, G. W. Greene, Whipple, and our little
- household of three. Holmes talked better than all, as usual.
- Willis played the part of appreciative listener. G. T. Davis
- told wonderful stories, and Mr. Whipple talked more than usual.
- Holmes described the line of beauty which is made by any two
- persons who talk together congenially thus 〰, whereas, when an
- adverse element comes in, it proceeds thus Ʌ; and by and by
- one which has a frightful retrograde movement, thus ∕. Then
- blank despair settles down upon the original talker. He said
- people should dovetail together like properly built mahogany
- furniture. Much of all this congeniality had to do with the
- physical, he said. “Now there is big Dr. ——; he and I do very
- well together; I have just two intellectual heart-beats to his
- one.” Willis said he thought there should be an essay written
- upon the necessity that literary men should live on a more
- concentrated diet than is their custom. “Impossible,” said the
- Professor, “there is something behind the man which drives him
- on to his fate; he goes as the steam-engine goes and one might
- as well say to the engine going at the rate of sixty miles,
- ‘you had better stop now,’ and so make it stop, as to say it
- to a man driven on by a vital preordained energy for work.”
- Each man has a philosophical coat fitted to his shoulders, and
- he did not expect to find it fitting anybody else.
-
-At another breakfast, in 1861, we find, besides the favorite humorist of
-the day, Dr. Holmes’s son and namesake, then a young officer in the Union
-army, now Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.
-
- _Sunday, December 8, 1861._—Yesterday morning “Artemus Ward,”
- Mr. Browne, breakfasted with us, also Dr. Holmes and the
- lieutenant, his son. We had a merry time because Jamie was in
- grand humor and represented people and incidents in the most
- incomparable manner. “Why,” said Dr. Holmes to him afterward,
- “you must excuse me that I did not talk, but the truth is there
- is nothing I enjoy so much as your anecdotes, and whenever I
- get a chance I can’t help listening to them.” The Professor
- complimented Artemus upon his great success and told him the
- pleasure he had received. Artemus twinkled all over, but said
- little after the Professor arrived. He was evidently immensely
- possessed by him. The young lieutenant has mostly recovered
- from his wound and speaks as if duty would recall him soon to
- camp. He will go when the time comes, but home evidently never
- looked half so pleasant before. Poor fellows! Heaven send us
- peace before long!
-
-The finely bound copy of Dr. Holmes’s Fourth of July Oration at the
-Boston City Celebration of 1863, to which the following passage refers,
-is one of the rarities sought by American book-collectors. It was a
-practice of Dr. Holmes at this time to have his public speeches set up
-in large, legible type for his own reading at their delivery. One of
-these, an address to the alumni of Harvard on July 16, 1863, with the
-inscription, “Oliver Wendell Holmes to his friend James T. Fields. One
-of six copies printed,” is found among the Charles Street papers, and
-contributes, like the passage that follows, to the sense of pleasant
-intimacy between the neighboring houses.
-
- _August 3, 1863._—Dr. Holmes dropped in last night about his
- oration which the City Council have had printed and superbly
- bound. He has addressed it to the “Common Council” instead of
- the “City Council,” and he is much disturbed. J. T. F. told
- him it made but small consequence, and he went off comforted.
- One of the members of the Council told Mr. F. it was amusing
- to see “the Professor” while this address was passing through
- the press. He was so afraid something would be wrong that he
- would come in to see about it half a dozen times a day, until
- it seemed as if he considered this small oration of more
- consequence than the affairs of the state. Yet laugh as they
- may about these little peculiarities of “our Professor,” he is
- a most wonderful man.
-
-[Illustration: _Reduced facsimile of first page of Dr. Holmes’ 1863
-Address to the Alumni of Harvard_]
-
-In explanation of the ensuing bit, it need only be said that in October
-of 1863 Señorita Isabella Cubas was appearing at the Boston Theatre
-in “The Wizard Skiff, or the Massacre of Scio,” and other pantomimes.
-“The Wizard Skiff,” according to the “Advertiser,” was given on the
-fourteenth. On the sixteenth, a characteristic announcement read: “At ¼
-past 8 Señorita Cubas will dance La Madrilena.” The tear of Dr. Holmes at
-the spectacle may be remembered with the “poetry and religion” anecdote
-of Emerson, Margaret Fuller, and Fanny Ellsler.
-
- _October 16, 1863._—Mr. F. went in two evenings since to find
- Professor Holmes. His wife said he was out. “I don’t know where
- he is gone, I am sure, Mr. Fields,” she said in her eager way,
- “but he said he had finished his work and asked if he might go,
- and I told him he might, though he would not tell where he was
- going.”
-
- Yesterday the “where” transpired. “By the way,” said the
- Professor, “have you seen that little poem by Mrs. Waterston
- upon the death of Colonel Shaw, ‘Together’? It made me cry.
- However, I don’t know how much that means, for I went to see
- the ‘beautiful Cubas’ in a pantomime the other night, and the
- first thing I knew down came a great round fat tear and went
- splosh on the ground. Wasn’t I provoked!”
-
-[Illustration: FROM THE PLAY-BILL OF THE NIGHT OF DR. HOLMES’S “GREAT
-ROUND FAT TEAR”]
-
-The next fragment is neither a letter nor a passage from the diary, but a
-bit of excellent fooling, in Dr. Holmes’s handwriting, on a sheet of note
-paper. The meteorological records of 1864 would probably show that there
-were heavy rains in the course of the year. From Dr. Holmes’s interest
-in the tracing of Dr. Johnson’s footsteps an even century before his
-own, it is easy to imagine his fancy playing about the rainfall of the
-century ahead. I cannot find that this _jeu d’esprit_, with its entirely
-characteristic flavor of the “Breakfast Table,” was ever printed by its
-author.
-
- _Letter from the last man left by the Deluge of the year 1964
- to the last woman left by the same_
-
- MY DEAR SOLE SURVIVORESS:—
-
- Love is natural to the human breast. The passion has seized me,
- and you, fortunately, cannot doubt as to its object.
-
- Adored one, fairest, and indeed only individual of your sex,
- can you, could you doubt that if the world still possessed its
- full complement of inhabitants, 823,060,413 according to the
- most recent estimate, I should hesitate in selecting you from
- the 411,530,206½ females in existence previous to the late
- accident? Believe it not! Trust not the deceivers who—but I
- forget the late melancholy occurrence for the moment!
-
- It is still damp in our—I beg your pardon—in my neighborhood.
- I hope you are careful of your precious health—so much depends
- upon it! The dodo is extinct—what if Man—but pardon me. Let me
- recommend long india-rubber boots—they will excite no remark,
- for reasons too obvious to mention.
-
- May I hope for a favorable answer to my suit by the bearer of
- this message, the carrier-goose, who was with me during the
- rainy season in the top of the gigantic pine?
-
- If any more favored suitor—What am I saying? If any
- recollection of the past is to come between me and happiness,
- break it gently to me, for my nerves have been a good deal
- tried by the loss of the human species (with the exception of
- ourselves) and there is something painful in the thought of
- shedding tears in a world so thoroughly saturated with liquid.
-
- I am (by the force of circumstances)
-
- Your Only lover and admirer
-
- ULTIMUS SMITH
-
- _O. W. H. Fixit._
-
-[Illustration: _Facsimile of the Conclusion of Ultimus Smith’s
-Declaration_]
-
-A few brief items of May of 1864 bring back a time of sadness for all the
-friends of Nathaniel Hawthorne.
-
- _May 11, 1864._—J. T. F. went to see Dr. Holmes about
- Hawthorne’s health. The latter came to town looking very very
- ill. O. W. H. thinks the shark’s tooth is upon him, but would
- not have this known. Walked and talked with him; then carried
- him to “Metcalf’s and treated him to simple medicine as we
- treat each other to ice cream.”
-
- O. W. H. picked up a New York pamphlet full of sneers against
- Boston “Mutual Admiration Society.” “These whipper-snappers of
- New York will do well to take care,” he says; “the noble race
- of men now so famous here is passing down the valley—then who
- will take their places! I am ashamed to know the names of these
- blackguards. There is ——, a stick of sugar-candy —— and, ——,
- who is not even a gum-drop, and plenty like them.”
-
- _Sunday. May 14._—Terrible days of war and change....
-
- _May 19._—Hawthorne is dead.
-
-Less than a year later came the record of another death—unique in that
-every survivor of the war-time seems to have remembered the very moment
-and circumstances of learning the overwhelming fact.
-
- _April 15, 1865._—Last night when I shut this book I wondered a
- little what event or person would come next, powerful enough to
- compel me to write a few words; and before I was dressed this
- morning the news of the assassination of the President became
- our only thought. The President, Seward, and his son!
-
- Mrs. Andrew came in before nine o’clock to ask if we thought it
- would be expected of her to receive “the Club” on Monday. We
- decided “No,” immediately, which chimed with her desire.
-
- The city is weighed down by sadness. But Dr. Holmes expresses
- his philosophy for the consolation of all. “It will unite the
- North,” he says. “It is more than likely that Lincoln was not
- the best man for the work of re-construction,” etc. His faith
- keeps him from the shadows which surround many.
-
- But it is a black day for us all. J. Wilkes Booth is in
- custody. Poor Edwin is in Boston.
-
- _April 22._—False report. Up to this date J. Wilkes Booth has
- not been taken. A reward of nearly $200,000 is set upon his
- head, but we believe him to have fled into Maryland or farther
- south, with some marauding party.
-
-Henry Howard Brownell, the author of “War Lyrics,” appears in the
-following extract, with Dr. Holmes, whose high opinion of this singer of
-naval battle was set forth in print of no uncertain tone. Of Forceythe
-Willson, a poet, not yet thirty years old, of whom great things were
-expected, Mrs. Fields wrote later in the same volume of the journal: “He
-affects me like a wild Tennyson.... He is an indigenous growth of our
-middle states. He was a pupil of Horace Mann, and appreciated him.”
-
- _April 29, 1865._—Club dinner for J. T. F. Mr. Brownell was
- present, author of “The Bay Fight,” as Dr. Holmes’s guest. Dr.
- H. said privately to us, “Well, ’tain’t much for some folks
- to do what I’m doing for this man, but it’s a good deal for
- me. I don’t like that kind of thing, you know. I find myself
- unawares in something the position of a lion-hunter, which
- is unpleasant!!!” He has lately discovered that Forceythe
- Willson, the author of a noble poem called the “Color Sergeant”
- [“The Old Sergeant”], has been living two years in Cambridge.
- He wrote to him and told him how much he liked his poem and
- said he would like to make his acquaintance. “I will be at
- home,” the young poet replied to the elder, “at any time you
- may appoint to call upon me.” This was a little strange to O.
- W. H., who rather expected, as the elder who was extending
- the right hand, to be called upon, I suppose, although he did
- not say so. He found a fortress of a man, “shy as Hawthorne,”
- and “one who had not learned that the eagle’s wings should
- sometimes be kept down, as we people who live in the world
- must,” said the Professor to me afterward. “In State” by F. W.
- is a great poem.
-
-More than a year later is found this characteristic glimpse of Dr. Holmes
-in the elation of finishing one of his books.
-
- _Wednesday, September 12, 1866._—After an hour J. went in to
- see Dr. Holmes. This was important. He had promised a week ago
- to hear him read his new romance, and he did not wish to show
- anything but the lively interest he really feels....
-
- Jamie returned in two hours perfectly enchanted. The novel
- exceeded his hopes. No diminishing of power is to be seen; on
- the contrary it seems the perfect fruit of a life. It is to be
- called “The Guardian Angel.” Four parts are already completed
- and large books of notes stand ready for use and reference.
- Mrs. Holmes came in to tell Mr. Fields she wished Wendell would
- not publish anything more. He would only call down newspaper
- criticism, and where was the use. “Well, Amelia, I have written
- something now which the critics won’t complain of. You see
- it’s better than anything I have ever done.” “Oh, that’s what
- you always say, Wendell, but I wish you’d let it alone!” “But
- don’t you see, Amelia, I shall make money by it, and that won’t
- come amiss.” “No indeed, Mr. Fields, not in these times with
- our family, you know.” “But there’s one thing,” said the little
- Professor, suddenly looking up to Mr. Fields; “if anything
- should happen to me before I get the story done, you wouldn’t
- come down upon the widder for the money, would you now?” Then
- they had a grand laugh all round. He is very nervous indeed
- about his work and read it with great reluctance, yet desired
- to do so. He had read it to no one as yet until Mr. Fields
- should hear it.
-
- Wendell, his son, had just returned from England, bringing
- a young English Captain of Artillery home with him for the
- night, the hotels being crowded. The captain’s luggage was
- in the entry. The Professor drew J. aside to show him how
- the straps of the luggage were arranged in order to slip in
- the address-card. “D’ye see that—good, ain’t it? I’ve made a
- drawing of that and am going to have some made like it.”
-
-Near the end of 1866, Mrs. Fields, after a few words of realization that
-something lies beyond the age of thirty, pictures “the Autocrat” at her
-own breakfast-table, with General John Meredith Read, afterwards minister
-to Greece, and already, before that age of thirty which the diarist was
-just completing, an important figure in the military and political life
-of New York. A few sentences from the following passage are found in Mrs.
-Fields’s article on Dr. Holmes, which appeared first in the “Century
-Magazine,” and then in “Authors and Friends.”
-
- It comes over me to put down here and now the fact that this
- year for the first time others perceived, as well as myself,
- that I have passed the freshness and lustre of youth—but I
- do not feel the change as I once thought I must—life is even
- sweeter than ever and richer though I can still remember the
- time when thirty years seemed the desirable limit of life—now
- it opens before me full of uncompleted labor, full of riches
- and plans—the wealth of love, the plans of eternity.
-
- _Friday morning._—Professor Holmes and Adjutant General Read
- of New York (a young man despite his title) breakfasted here
- at eight o’clock. They were both here punctually at quarter
- past eight, which was early for the season, especially as the
- General was late out, at a ball, last night. He was only too
- glad of the chance, however, to meet Dr. Holmes, and would
- have made a far greater effort to accomplish it. The talk at
- one time turned upon Dickens. Dr. Holmes said he thought him
- a greater genius than Thackeray and was never satisfied with
- admiring his wondrous powers of observation and fertility
- of reproduction; his queer knack at making scenes, too, was
- noticeable, but especially the power of beginning from the
- smallest externals and describing a man to the life though
- he might get no farther than the shirt-button, for he always
- failed in profound analysis. Hawthorne, beginning from within,
- was his contrast and counterpart. But the two qualities which
- Dickens possesses and which the world seems to take small
- account of, but which mark his peculiar greatness, are the
- minuteness of his observations and his endless variety.
- Thackeray had sharp corners in him, something which led you
- to see he could turn round short upon you some day, although
- sadness was an impressive element in his character—perhaps a
- sadness belonging to genius. Hawthorne’s sadness was a part of
- his genius—tenderness and sadness.
-
-[Illustration: MRS. FIELDS
-
-_From a crayon portrait made by Rowse in 1863_]
-
-On Monday, February 25, 1867, Mrs. Fields made note of the Saturday
-Club dinner of two days before, at which the guests were George William
-Curtis, “Petroleum V. Nasby,” and Dr. Hayes of Arctic fame, of whom
-Mrs. Fields had written a few days before: “He wears a corrugated face,
-and his slender spirited figure shows him the man for such resolves and
-expeditions. We were carried away like the hearers of an Arabian tale
-with his vivid pictures of Arctic life.” But apparently he was not the
-chief talker at the Saturday Club meeting, for Mrs. Fields wrote of it:
-“Dr. Holmes was in great mood for talk, but Lowell was critical and
-interrupted him frequently. ‘Now, James, let me talk and don’t interrupt
-me,’ he once said, a little ruffled by the continual strictures on his
-conversation.” But by the time that Longfellow’s sixtieth birthday came
-round on the following Wednesday, Dr. Holmes was ready for it with the
-verses, “In gentle bosoms tried and true,” recorded in Longfellow’s
-diary, and for another encounter with Lowell, who also celebrated the day
-with a poem, beginning “I need not praise the sweetness of his song.”
-Mrs. Fields’s diary records her husband’s account of the evening:—
-
- _February 28, 1867._—Thursday morning. Jamie had a most
- brilliant evening at Longfellow’s. A note came in from O. W.
- H. towards night, saying he was full of business and full of
- his story, but he _must_ go to L.’s. Lowell’s poem in the
- morning had helped to stir him. J. reached his door punctually
- at eight. There stood the little wonder with hat and coat on
- and door ajar, his wife beside him. “I wouldn’t let him go
- with anybody else,” she said. “Mr. Fields, he ought not to
- go out tonight; hear him, how he wheezes with the asthma.
- Now, Wendell, _when_ will you get home?” “Oh,” said he, “I
- don’t know. I put myself into Mr. Fields’s hands.” “Well, Mr.
- Fields, how early can you get him home?” “About twelve,” was
- the answer. “Now that’s pretty well,” said the Doctor. “Amelia,
- go in and shut the door. Mr. Fields will take care of me.”
- So between fun and anxiety they chatted away until they were
- fairly into the street and in the car. “I’ve been doing too
- much lately between my lectures and my story, and the fine
- dinners I have been to, and I ought not to go out tonight. Why,
- it’s one of the greatest compliments one man ever paid another,
- my going out to Longfellow’s tonight. By the way, Mr. Fields,
- do you appreciate the position you hold in our time? There
- never was anything like it. Why, I was nothing but a roaring
- kangaroo when you took me in hand, and I thought it was the
- right thing to stand up on my hind legs, but you combed me down
- and put me in proper shape. Now I want you to promise me one
- thing. We’re all growing old, I’m near sixty myself; by and by
- the brain will begin to soften. Now you must tell me when the
- egg begins to look addled. People don’t know of themselves.”
-
- He had been to two large dinners lately, one at G. W. Wales’s,
- which he said was the finest dinner he had ever seen, the most
- perfect in all its appointments, decorated with the largest
- profusion of flowers, in as perfect taste as he had ever seen.
- “Why, even the chair you sat in was so delicately padded as
- to give pleasure to that weak spot in the back which we all
- inherit from the fall of Adam.” The other was at Mrs. Charles
- Dorr’s, where there were sixteen at table and the room “for
- heat was like the black hole at Calcutta,” but the company
- was very brilliant. Mr. and Mrs. Winthrop, Mrs. Parkman, Dr.
- Hayes, etc. He sat next Mrs. ——; says she is a thorough-bred
- woman of society, the daughter of a politician, the wife, first
- of a millionaire and now of a man of society. “I like such a
- woman now and then; she never makes a mistake.” Mrs. —— was
- thoroughly canvassed at the table, “picked clean as any duck
- for the spit and then roasted over a slow fire,” as O. W. H.
- afterward remarked to Mrs. Parkman, who is a very just woman
- and who weighed her well in the balances.
-
- When they arrived at L.’s, my basket of flowers stood,
- surrounded by other gifts, and Longfellow himself sat crowned
- with all the natural loveliness of his rare nature. The day
- must have been a happy one for him.... O. W. H. had three
- perfect verses of a little poem in his hand which he read, and
- then Lowell talked, and they had great merriment and delight
- together.
-
-[Illustration: FIELDS, THE MAN OF BOOKS AND FRIENDSHIPS]
-
-The two following passages from the diary for 1868 seem to indicate that
-Dr. Holmes made a double use of his poem, “Bill and Joe,” written in this
-year, included in his “Poems of the Class of ’29,” and according to the
-entry of July 17, read at the Harvard Phi Beta Kappa dinner of 1868:—
-
- _January 16, 1868._—We had just finished dinner when Professor
- Holmes came in with his poem, one of the annual he contributes
- to the class-supper of the “Boys of ’29.” He read it through
- to us with feeling, his voice growing tremulous and husky at
- times. It was pleasant to see how he enjoyed our pleasure in
- it. The talk turned naturally after a little upon the question
- of Chief Justice, when he took occasion to run over in his
- mind the character and qualifications of some of our chief
- barristers. “As for Bigelow[4] (who has just gone out of office
- and it is his successor over whom they are struggling), as for
- Bigelow, it is astonishing to see how every bit of that man’s
- talent has been brought into use; all he has is made the most
- of. Why, he’s like some cooks, give ’em a horse and they will
- use every part of him except the shoes.”
-
- _Friday, July 17, 1868._—Last evening Dr. Holmes came in
- fresh from the Phi Beta dinner at Cambridge.[5] He said, “I
- can’t stop and I only came to read you my verses I read at
- the dinner, they made such a queer impression. I didn’t mean
- to go, but James Lowell was to preside and sent me word that
- I really must be there, so I just wrote these off, and here
- they are—I don’t know that I should have brought them in to
- read to you, but Hoar declares they are the best I have ever
- done.” At length, in the exquisite orange of sunset, he read
- those delightful verses, full, full of feeling, “Bill and Joe.”
- We did not wonder the Phi Beta boys liked them. I shall be
- surprised if every boy, especially those who find the almond
- blossoms in the hair, as W. says, does not like them, and if
- they do _not_ win for him a more universal reputation than he
- has yet won....
-
- I was impressed last night with the nervous energy of O. W.
- H. His leg by a slight quiver kept time to the reading of his
- verses, and his talk fell before and after like swift rain.
- He does not go away from town but sways between Boston and
- Cambridge all these perfect summer days; receiving yesterday,
- the hottest day of this or many years, Motley at dinner, and
- going perpetually, and writing verses and letters not a few.
- His activity is wonderful; think of writing letters these warm
- delicious evenings by gaslight in a small front study on the
- street! It hurts him less than his wife, partly because the
- intellectual vivacity and excitement keeps him up, partly
- because he is physically fitted to bear almost everything but
- cold. How fortunate for the world that while he lives he should
- continue his work so faithfully. He will have no successor, at
- least for many a long year, after we have all gone to sleep
- under our green counterpanes and Nature has tucked us up well
- in yearly violets.
-
-Earlier in the year Dr. Holmes and Mrs. Stowe met in Charles Street.
-
- _Wednesday morning, January 29, 1868._—Last night Professor
- Holmes, Mrs. Stowe, her daughter Georgie, and the Howellses,
- took tea here. The Professor came early and was in good talking
- trim—presently in came Mrs. Stowe, and they fell shortly into
- talk upon Homeopathy and Allopathy. He grew very warm, declared
- that cases cited of cures proved nothing, and we were all
- “incompetent” to judge! We could not but be amused at his heat,
- for we were more or less believers in Homeopathy against his
- one argument for Allopathy. In vain Mrs. Stowe and I tried to
- turn and stem the fiery tide: Georgie or Mrs. Howells would
- be sure to sweep us back into it again. However, there were
- many brilliant things said, and sweet and good and interesting
- things too. The Professor told us one curious fact, that
- chemists had in vain analyzed the poison of rattlesnakes and
- could not discover the elements of destruction it undoubtedly
- possesses. Also that, when Indians poison their arrows with
- it, they hang up the liver of a white wolf and make one snake
- after another bite it until the liver is entirely impregnated;
- they then leave it to dry until disintegrated, when they
- moisten and apply round the necks of the arrows—_not on the
- point_. He had a long quiet chat with Mrs. Stowe before the
- evening ended. They compared their early Calvinistic education
- and the effect produced upon their characters by such training.
-
- _Tuesday, April 13, 1869._—Dr. Holmes and his wife and Mr.
- Whittier dined here. The talk was free, totally free from all
- feeling of constraint, as it could not have been had another
- person been present. Whittier says he is afraid of strangers,
- and Dr. Holmes is never more delightful than under just such
- auspices. Dr. Holmes asked Whittier’s undisguised opinion
- of Longfellow’s “New England Tragedies”—“honest opinion
- now,” said he. “Well, I liked them,” said Whittier, half
- reluctantly—evidently he had found much that was beautiful and
- in keeping with the spirit of the times of which Longfellow
- wrote, and their passionless character did not trouble him as
- it had O. W. H. Presently, he added that he was surprised to
- find how he had preserved almost literally the old text of the
- old books he had lent Longfellow twelve years ago, and had
- measured it off into verse. “Ah,” said O. W. H., “you have
- said the severest thing after all—‘measured off’; that’s just
- what he has done. It is one of the easiest, the very commonest
- tricks of the rhymster to be able to do this. I am surprised to
- see the ease with which I can do it myself.” They spoke then
- of “Evangeline,” which both agreed in awarding unqualified
- praise. “Only,” said Whittier, “I always wondered there was
- no terrible outburst of indignation over the outrage done to
- that poor colony. The tide of the story runs as smoothly as if
- nothing had occurred. I long thought of working up that story
- myself, but I am glad I did not, only I can’t understand its
- being so calm.” They talked on religious questions of course,
- the Professor holding that sin being finite, and of such a
- nature that we could both outgrow it and root it up, Whittier
- still returning to the ground that sin was a “very real thing.”
-
- It is impossible to represent the clearness and swiftness
- of Dr. Holmes’s talk. The purity of heart and strength of
- endeavor evident in the two poets makes their atmosphere a very
- elevating one and they evidently naturally rejoiced in each
- other’s society.
-
- Mrs. Holmes had not been out to dine before this winter.
- Jamie sent us a pot of strawberries growing, which delighted
- everybody.
-
-Before the following passage was written, in 1871, Dr. Holmes had moved
-from Charles Street to Beacon Street; Mr. Fields, in impaired health,
-had retired from active business as a publisher and was devoting himself
-chiefly to writing and lecturing; and Mrs. Fields, already interested
-in the establishment of Coffee Houses for the poor in the North End and
-elsewhere, had begun the notable work in public charities to which her
-energies were so largely given for the remaining forty-four years of her
-life. In the Coöperative Workrooms, still rendering their beneficent
-services, and in the larger organization of the Associated Charities,
-embodying a principle now widely adopted throughout the land, the labors
-of this generous spirit, never content to give all it had to the gracious
-life within its own four walls, have borne enduring fruits.
-
- 1871.—Thursday afternoon last (June 22) went to Cambridge for
- a few visits, and coming home stopped at Dr. Holmes’s, at
- his new house on Beacon St. Found them both at home, sitting
- lonely in the oriel window looking out upon a glorious sunset.
- They were thinking of the children who have flown out of their
- nest. Dr. Holmes was very friendly and sweet. He talked most
- affectionately with J., told him he no longer felt a spur to
- write since he had gone out of business; he needed just the
- little touch of praise and encouragement he used to administer
- to make him do it; now he did not think he should ever write
- any more worth mentioning. He had been in to see the Coffee
- House and entertained us much by saying he met President
- Eliot near the door one day just as he was going in, but he
- was ashamed of doing so until they had parted company. There
- was something so childlike in this confession that we all
- laughed heartily over it. However he got in at last, and “tears
- as big as onions stood in my eyes when I saw what had been
- accomplished.” “You must be a very happy woman,” he went on
- to say. I told him of the new one in Eliot Street about to be
- opened this coming week.
-
-At the end of the summer of 1871, when Mr. and Mrs. Fields were beginning
-to learn the charms of the North Shore town of Manchester, where they
-established the “Gambrel Cottage” on “Thunderbolt Hill” which gave a
-summer synonym to the hospitality of Charles Street, they journeyed one
-day to Nahant for a midday dinner with Longfellow. Here Mrs. Fields’s
-sister, Louisa, Mrs. James H. Beal, was a neighbor of the poet. Another
-neighbor was the late George Abbot James, and in Longfellow’s diary for
-September 4, 1871, is the entry: “Call on Dr. Holmes at Mr. James’s.
-Sumner still there. We discuss the new poets.” Mrs. Fields reports a
-continuation of the talk with the same friends.
-
- _Wednesday, September 6, 1871._—Dined with Mr. Longfellow at
- Nahant. The day was warm with a soft south wind blowing, and as
- we crossed the beach white waves were curling up the sands....
- The dear poet saw us coming from afar and walked to his little
- gate to meet us with such a sweet cordial welcome that it was
- worth going many a mile to have that alone. The three little
- ladies, his daughters, and Ernest’s wife, were within, but
- they came warmly forward to give us greeting; also Mr. Sam.
- Longfellow was of the party. A few moments’ chat in the little
- parlor, when Longfellow saw Holmes coming in the distance (he
- had an opera-glass, being short-sighted, and was sitting on
- the piazza with J.). “Hullo!” said he, “here comes Holmes,
- and all dressed up too, with flowers in his button-hole.”
- Sure enough, here was _the_ Professor to have dinner with
- us also. He was full of talk as ever and looking remarkably
- well. Longfellow asked with much interest about Balaustion and
- Joaquin Miller, neither of which he had read. Holmes criticized
- as if unbearable and beyond the pale of decency Browning’s
- cutting of words, “Flower o’ the pine,” and such characteristic
- passages. Longfellow spoke of a volume of poems he had received
- of late from England in which “saw” was made to rhyme with
- “more.” Holmes said Keats often did that. “Not exactly, I
- think,” said L., “‘dawn’ and ‘forlorn,’ perhaps.” “Well,”
- said H., “when I was in college” (I think he said college,
- certainly while at Cambridge) “and my first volume was about
- to appear, Mrs. Folsom saw the sheets and fortunately at the
- very last moment for correction discovered I had made ‘forlorn’
- rhyme with ‘gone,’ and out of her own head and without having
- time to consult with me she substituted ‘sad and wan.’”[6]
- The Professor went on to say that he must confess to a tender
- feeling of regret for his “so forlorn” to this very day, but he
- supposed every writer of poems must have his keen regrets for
- the numerous verses he could recall where he had wrestled with
- the English language and had lost something of his thought in
- his struggle with the necessities of art. We shortly after went
- to dinner, where the talk still continued to turn on art and
- artists, chiefly musical, the divorcement of music and thought;
- a thinker or man of intellect in listening to music comes to a
- comprehension of it, Holmes said, mediately, but a musician
- feels it directly through some gift of which the thinker knows
- nothing. Longfellow always recalls with intense delight hearing
- Gounod sing his own music in Rome—his voice was hardly to be
- mentioned among the fine voices of the world, indeed it was
- small, but his rendering was exquisite. Canvassing T. B. Read’s
- poems and speaking of “Sheridan’s Ride,” which has been so
- highly praised, “Yes,” said Holmes, “but there are very poor
- lines in it, but how often, to use Scripture phrase, there
- is a fly in the ointment.” The talk went bowling off to Père
- Hyacinthe. “He was very pleasant,” said Holmes, “it was most
- agreeable to meet him, but you could only go a short distance.
- His desire was to be a good Catholic, and ours is of course
- quite different. It was like speaking through a knot-hole after
- all.”
-
- The dumb waiter bounced up. “We cannot call that a _dumb_
- waiter,” said L., “but I had an odd dream the other night.
- I thought Greene (G. W.) came bouncing up on the waiter in
- that manner and stepped off in a most dignified fashion with
- a crushed white hat on his head. He said he had just been to
- drive with a Spanish lady.”
-
- Sumner (Charles) came up to the piazza. He had dined elsewhere
- and came over as soon as possible for a little talk. Holmes
- talked on, although we all said, “Mr. Sumner—here is Mr.
- Sumner,” without perceiving that the noble Senator was sitting
- just outside the cottage window waiting for us to rise, and
- began to converse about him. Longfellow grew nervous and rose
- to speak with Sumner—still Holmes did not perceive, and went
- on until Jamie relieved us from a tendency to convulsions by
- voting that we should join the Senator. Then Sumner related the
- substance of an amusing letter of Cicero’s he had just been
- reading in which Cicero gives an account to his friend of a
- visit he had just received from the Emperor Julius Cæsar. He
- had invited Julius to pass a few days with him, but he came
- quite unexpectedly with a thousand men! Cicero, seeing them
- from afar, debated with another friend what he should do with
- them, but at length managed to encamp them. To feed them was
- a less easy matter. The emperor took everything quite easily,
- however, and was very pleasant, “but,” adds Cicero, “he is not
- the man to whom I should say a second time, ‘if you are passing
- this way, give me a call.’”
-
-Again, in 1873, Longfellow, Holmes, and Sumner are found together at
-the dinner-table with Mrs. Fields, this time in Charles Street. When
-she made use of her diary at this point, for her article on Dr. Holmes
-which appeared first in the “Century Magazine” (1895), it was with many
-omissions. The passage is now given almost entire. It should be said that
-the Misses Towne, mentioned at the beginning of it, were friends and
-summer neighbors at Manchester.
-
- _Saturday, October 11, 1873._—Helen and Alice Towne have come
- to pass Sunday with us. Charles Sumner, Longfellow, Greene, Dr.
- Holmes came to dine. Mr. Sumner seemed less strong than of late
- and I fancied he suffered somewhat while at table during the
- evening, but he told me he was working at his desk or reading
- during fourteen consecutive hours not infrequently at present,
- as he was in the habit of doing when uninterrupted by friendly
- visits. He said he was very fond of the passive exercise of
- reading; the active exercise of composition was of course
- agreeable in certain moods, but reading was a never-ending
- delight. He spoke of Lord Brougham, and Mrs. Norton and her two
- beautiful sisters. Both he and Mr. Longfellow recalled them in
- their youthful loveliness, but Mr. Sumner said when he was in
- England the last time he saw the Duchess of Somerset, who was a
- most poetic looking creature in her youth and (I believe) the
- youngest of the three sisters, so changed he should never have
- guessed who it might be. She was grown a huge red-faced woman.
- (Longfellow laughed, referring to her second marriage and
- said, “Yes, she had turned a Somerset!”) Dr. Holmes sparkled
- and coruscated as I have seldom heard him before. We are more
- than ever convinced that no one since Sydney Smith was ever so
- brilliant, so witty, spontaneous, naïf, and unfailing as Dr.
- Holmes. He talked much about his class in College: “There never
- was such vigor in any class before, it seems to me—almost every
- member turns out sooner or later distinguished for something.
- We have had every grade of moral status from a criminal to a
- Chief Justice, and we never let any one of them drop. We keep
- hold of their hands year after year and lift up the weak and
- failing ones till they are at last redeemed. Ah, there was
- one exception—years ago we voted to cast a man out who had
- been a defaulter or who had committed some offense of that
- nature. The poor fellow sank down, and before the next year,
- when we repented of this decision, he had gone too far down and
- presently died. But we have kept all the rest. Every fourth man
- in our class is a poet. Sam. Smith belongs to our class, who
- wrote ‘My Country, ’tis of Thee.’ Sam. Smith will live when
- Longfellow, Whittier, and all the rest of us have gone into
- oblivion—and yet what is there in those verses to make them
- live? Do you remember the line ‘Like _that_ above’? I asked
- Sam. what ‘that’ referred to—he said ‘that rapture’!!—(The
- expression of the rapid talker’s face of contempt as he said
- this was one of the most amusing possible.)—Even the odds and
- ends of our class have turned out something.... Longfellow, I
- wish I could make you talk about yourself.”—“But I never do,”
- said L. quietly. “I know you never do, but you confessed to me
- once.”—“No, I don’t think I ever did,” said L. laughing
-
- Greene was for the most part utterly speechless. He attended
- with great assiduity to his dinner, which was a good one, and
- Longfellow was watchful and kind enough to send him little
- choice things to eat which he thought he would enjoy.
-
- Holmes was abstemious and never ceased talking—“Most men write
- too much. I would rather risk my future fame upon one lyric
- than upon ten volumes. But I have said Boston is the hub of the
- universe. I will rest upon that.”
-
- All this report is singularly dry compared with the wit and
- humor which radiated about the table. We laughed till the tears
- ran down our cheeks. Longfellow was intensely amused. I have
- not seen him laugh so much for many a long day. We ladies sat
- at the table long after coffee and cigars in order to hear the
- talk....
-
- Sumner said he had been much displeased by a remark Professor
- Henry Hunt made to him a few days ago. He said Mr. Agassiz was
- an _impediment_ in the path of science. What did such men as
- Hunt and John Fiske mean by underrating a man who has given
- such books to the world as Agassiz has done, not to speak of
- his untiring efforts in the other avenues of influence! “It
- means just this,” said Holmes: “Agassiz will not listen to the
- Darwinian theory; his whole effort is on the other side. Now
- Agassiz is no longer young, and I was reading the other day
- in a book on the Sandwich Islands of an old Fejee man who had
- been carried away among strangers, but who prayed he might be
- carried home, that his brains might be beaten out in peace by
- his son according to the custom of those lands. It flashed over
- me then that our sons beat out our brains in the same way. They
- do not walk in our ruts of thoughts or begin exactly where we
- leave off, but they have a new standpoint of their own. At
- present the Darwinian theory can be nothing but an hypothesis;
- the important links of proof are missing and cannot be
- supplied; but in the myriad ages there may be new developments.”
-
- I thought the young ladies looked a little tired sitting, so
- about nine o’clock we left the table—still the talk went on
- for about four hours when they broke up.
-
-[Illustration: LOUIS AGASSIZ]
-
-With two letters from Dr. Holmes this rambling chronicle of his
-friendship with Mr. and Mrs. Fields must end. The first of the
-communications is a mere fragment of his everyday humor:
-
- BEVERLY-FARMS-BY-THE-DEPOT
-
- _July 18th, 1878_
-
- DEAR MR. FIELDS:—
-
- The Corner sends me a book directed to me here, but on opening
- the outside wrapper I read “James T. Fields, Esq., Jamaica
- Plain, Boston, Mass.” The book, which is sealed up (or stuck
- up, like many authors), measures 7 × 5, nearly, and is
- presumably idiotic, like most books which are sent us without
- being ordered.
-
- Perhaps you have received a similar package which on opening
- you found directed to O. W. Holmes, Esq., Peak of Teneriffe,
- Boston. If so, when the weather grows cool again and we can
- make up our minds to face the title page of the dreaded volume,
- we will make an exchange.
-
- Always truly yours,
-
- O. W. HOLMES
-
-The second letter, written ten years after Dr. Holmes, in moving
-from Charles to Beacon Street, had made the last of his “justifiable
-domicides,” strikes a more serious note, revealing that quality of true
-sympathy so closely joined in abundant natures with true humor. Mr.
-Fields had died in April of 1881, and Mrs. Fields had applied herself
-at once to the preparation of her volume, “James T. Fields: Biographical
-Notes and Personal Sketches,” drawing freely upon the diaries from
-which many of the foregoing pages, then passed over, are now taken. The
-performance of this loving labor must have done much towards the first
-filling of a life so grievously emptied. Already the intimate and beloved
-companionship of Miss Jewett had come into it.
-
- 294 BEACON ST., _November 16, 1881_
-
- MY DEAR MRS. FIELDS:—
-
- I feel sure there will be but one voice with regard to your
- beautiful memorial volume. If I had any misgivings that you
- might find the delicate task too difficult—that you might be
- discouraged between the wish to draw a life-like picture and
- the fear of saying more than the public had a right to, these
- misgivings have all vanished, and I am sure your finished task
- leaves nothing to be regretted. As he was in life, he is in
- your loving but not overwrought story. I do not see how a life
- so full of wholesome activity and genuine human feeling could
- have been better pictured than it is in your pages. Long before
- I had finished reading your memoir in the proofs I had learned
- to trust you entirely as to the whole management of the work
- on which you had entered. All I feared was that your feelings
- might be overtasked, and that the dread of coming before the
- public when your whole heart was in the pages opened to its
- calm judgment might be more than you could bear.
-
- And now, my dear Mrs. Fields, there must come a period of
- depression, almost of collapse, after the labor and the solace
- of this tender, tearful, yet blessed occupation. I think you
- need the kind thoughts and soothing words—if words have any
- virtue in them—of those who love you more than while each day
- had its busy hours in which the memory of so much that was
- delightful to recall kept the ever-returning pangs of grief
- a little while in abeyance. It must be so. But before long,
- quietly, almost imperceptibly, there will, I hope and trust,
- return to you the quieting sense of all that you have done and
- all that you have been for that life which for so many happy
- years you were privileged to share. How few women have so
- perfectly fulfilled, not only every duty, but every ideal that
- a husband could think of as going to make a happy home! This
- must be and will be an ever-growing source of consolation.
-
- Forgive me for saying what many others must have said to you,
- but none more sincerely than myself.
-
- I do not know how to express to you the feeling with which
- Mrs. Holmes looks upon you in your bereavement. I should do
- it injustice if I attempted to give it expression, for she
- lives so largely in her sympathies and her endeavors to help
- others that she could not but sorrow deeply with you in your
- affliction and wish there were any word of consolation she
- could add to the love she sends you.
-
- Believe me, dear Mrs. Fields,
-
- Affectionately yours,
-
- O. W. HOLMES
-
-For thirteen years longer, till his death in 1894 at the age of
-eighty-five, Dr. Holmes was a prolific writer of notes, more often than
-letters, to Mrs. Fields. The sympathy of tried and ripened friendship
-runs through them all. In the Charles Street house the younger friends
-might see from time to time this oldest friend of their hostess. When he
-came no more, it was well for those of a later day that his memory was so
-securely held in the retrospect and the record of Mrs. Fields.
-
-
-
-
-IV
-
-CONCORD AND CAMBRIDGE VISITORS
-
-
-The volumes in which Mrs. Fields brought to light many passages from her
-journals stand as red and black buoys marking the channel through which
-the navigator of these pages must steer his course if he is to avoid the
-rocks and shoals of the previously published. In her books it was but
-natural that she should deal most freely with those august figures in
-American letters who so towered above their contemporaries as to attach
-the longer and more portentous adjective “Augustan” to the circle formed
-by the joining of their hands. If it has become the fashion to look back
-upon the American Augustans and the English Victorians with similarly
-mingled feelings, in which tolerance stands in a growing proportion
-to the admiration and respect which formerly ruled supreme, it is the
-unaltered fact that the figures of the American group dominated both the
-local and the national scene of letters in their day, and that their
-historic significance is undiminished. But it is rather as human beings
-than as literary figures that they reveal themselves in the sympathetic
-records of Mrs. Fields—human beings who typified and embodied a state of
-thought and society so remote in its characteristic qualities from the
-prevailing conditions of this later day as to be approaching steadily
-that “equal date with Andes and with Ararat” of which one of them wrote
-in words quite unmistakably his own.
-
-Perhaps no single member of the group is represented in Mrs. Fields’s
-journals so often as Dr. Holmes by illuminating pages which she herself
-left unprinted. For this reason, and because Concord and Cambridge
-visitors to Charles Street were in fact so much a “group,” it has
-seemed wise to assemble in this place passages that relate to one after
-another of the “Augustan” friends in turn. Sometimes they appear as
-separate subjects of record, sometimes in company with their fellows.
-That majestic figure, Nathaniel Hawthorne, whose death in 1864 made the
-earliest gap in the circle of figures most memorable, shall be first to
-step forth, like one of his own personages of the Province House, from
-the shadows in which indeed he lived.
-
-[Illustration: HAWTHORNE IN 1857]
-
-The long chapter on Hawthorne in “Yesterdays with Authors,” and that
-small volume about him which Mrs. Fields contributed in 1899 to the
-“Beacon Biographies,” constitute the more finished portraits of the man
-as his host and hostess in Charles Street saw him. His letters to Fields
-are quoted at length in “Yesterdays with Authors,” and contribute an
-autobiographic element of much importance to any study of Hawthorne.
-But there are illuminating passages that were left unpublished. In one
-of them, for example, Hawthorne, in a letter of September 21, 1860,
-after lamenting the state of his daughter’s health, exclaimed: “I am
-continually reminded, nowadays, of a response which I once heard a
-drunken sailor make to a pious gentleman who asked him how he felt:
-‘Pretty d——d miserable, thank God!’ It very well expresses my thorough
-discomfort and forced acquiescence.” In another, of July 14, 1861, after
-the calamity that befell Longfellow in the tragic death of his wife
-through burning, Hawthorne wrote to Fields:—
-
-“How does Longfellow bear this terrible misfortune? How are his own
-injuries? Do write and tell me all about him. I cannot at all reconcile
-this calamity to my sense of fitness. One would think that there ought
-to have been no deep sorrow in the life of a man like him; and now comes
-this blackest of shadows, which no sunshine hereafter can ever penetrate!
-I shall be afraid ever to meet him again; he cannot again be the man that
-I have known.”
-
-In the words, “I shall be afraid ever to meet him again,” the very
-accent of Hawthorne is clearly heard. Still another manuscript letter,
-preserved in the Charles Street cabinet, should now be printed to round
-out the story of Hawthorne’s reluctant omission from his “Atlantic”
-article—“Chiefly about War Matters”—that personal description of Abraham
-Lincoln which Fields was unwilling to publish in his magazine in 1862,
-but afterwards included in his “Yesterdays with Authors.”[7] In that
-place, however, he used but a few words from the following letter.
-
- CONCORD, _May 23, ’62_
-
- DEAR FIELDS:—
-
- I have looked over the article under the influence of a cigar
- and through the medium (but don’t whisper it) of a glass of
- arrack and water; and though I think you are wrong, I am going
- to comply with your request. I am the most good-natured man,
- and the most amenable to good advice (or bad advice either,
- for that matter) that you ever knew—so have it your own way.
- The whole description of the interview with Uncle Abe and his
- personal appearance must be omitted, since I do not find it
- possible to alter them, and in so doing, I really think you
- omit the only part of the article really worth publishing. Upon
- my honor, it seemed to me to have a historical value—but let it
- go. I have altered and transferred one of the notes so as to
- indicate to the unfortunate public that it here loses something
- very nice. You must mark the omission with dashes, so—x x x x x
- x x.
-
- I have likewise modified the other passage you allude to; and I
- cannot now conceive of any objection to it.
-
- What a terrible thing it is to try to get off a little bit of
- truth into this miserable humbug of a world! If I had sent you
- the article as I first conceived it, I should not so much have
- wondered.
-
- I want you to send me a proof sheet of the article in its
- present state before making any alterations; for if ever I
- collect these sketches into a volume, I shall insert it in all
- its original beauty.
-
- With the best regards to Mrs. Fields,
-
- Truly yours,
-
- NATH’L HAWTHORNE
-
- P. S. I shall probably come to Boston next week, to the
- Saturday Club.
-
-If these unpublished letters add something to the more formal portraits
-of Hawthorne drawn by Fields and his wife, still other lines may be added
-by means of the unconscious, fragmentary sketches on which the portraits
-were based. In Mrs. Fields’s diaries the following glimpses of Hawthorne
-in the final months of his life are found.
-
- _December 4, 1863._—Hawthorne and Mr. and Mrs. Alden passed the
- night with us; he came to town to attend the funeral of Mrs.
- Franklin Pierce. He seemed ill and more nervous than usual. He
- brought the first part of a story which he says he shall never
- finish.[8] J. T. F. says it is very fine, yet sad. Hawthorne
- says in it, “pleasure is only pain greatly exaggerated,” which
- is queer to say the least, if not untrue. I think it must be
- differently stated from this. He was as courteous and as grand
- as ever, and as true. He does not lose that all-saddening
- smile, either.
-
- _Sunday, December 6, 1863._—Mr. Hawthorne returned to us. He
- had found General Pierce overwhelmed with sadness at the death
- of his wife and greatly needing his companionship, therefore
- he accompanied him the whole distance to Concord, N. H. He
- said he could not generally look at such things, but he was
- obliged to look at the body of Mrs. Pierce. It was like a
- carven image laid in its richly embossed enclosure and there
- was a remote expression about it as if it had nothing to do
- with things present. Harriet Prescott was there. He had some
- talk with her and liked her. He was more deeply impressed than
- ever with the exquisite courtesy of his friend. Even at the
- grave, while overwhelmed with grief, Pierce drew up the collar
- of Hawthorne’s coat to keep him from the cold.[9]
-
- We went to walk in the morning and left Mr. Hawthorne to read
- in the library. He found a book called “Dealings with the
- Dead,” which he liked—indeed he said he liked no house to stay
- in better than this. He thought the old edition of Boccaccio
- which belonged to Leigh Hunt a poor translation. He has already
- written the first chapter of a new romance, but he thought so
- little of the work himself as to make it impossible for him to
- continue until Mr. Fields had read it and expressed his sincere
- admiration for the work. This has given him better heart to go
- on with it. He talked of the magazine with Mr. F.; told him he
- thought it was the most ably edited magazine in the world, and
- was bound to be a success, with this exception: he said, “I
- fear its politics—beware! What will you do when in a year or
- two the politics of the country change?” “I will quietly wait
- for that time to come,” said J. T. F.; “then I can tell you.”
-
- As the sunset deepened Mr. Hawthorne talked of his early life.
- His grandfather bought a township in Maine and at the early age
- of eleven years he accompanied his mother and sister down there
- to live upon the land. From that moment the happiest period of
- his life began and lasted until he was thirteen, when he was
- sent to school in Salem. While in Maine he lived like a bird
- of the air, so perfect was the freedom he enjoyed. During the
- moonlight nights of winter he would skate until midnight alone
- upon the icy face of Sebago Lake, with all its ineffable beauty
- stretched before him and the deep shadows of the hills on
- either hand. When he was weary he could take refuge sometimes
- in a log cabin (there were several in this region), where
- half a tree would be burning on the broad hearth and he could
- sit by that and see the stars up through the chimney. All the
- long summer days he roamed at will, gun in hand, through the
- woods, and there he learned a nearness to Nature and a love
- for free life which has never left him and made all other
- existence in a measure insupportable. His suffering began with
- that Salem school and his knowledge of his relatives who were
- all distasteful to him. He said, “How sad middle life looks
- to people of erratic temperaments. Everything is beautiful in
- youth—all things are allowed to it.” We gave him “Pet Marjorie”
- to read in the evening—a little story by John Brown. He thought
- it so beautiful that he read it carefully twice until every
- word was grasped by his powerful memory....
-
- Talking of England, Hawthorne said she was not a powerful
- empire. The extent over which her dominions extended led her to
- fancy herself powerful. She is much like a squash vine which
- runs over a whole garden, but once cut at the root and it is
- gone at once.
-
- We talked and laughed about Boswell, whom he thinks one of
- the most remarkable men who ever lived, and J. T. F. recalled
- that story of Johnson who, upon being told of a man who had
- committed some misdemeanor and was upon the verge of committing
- suicide in consequence, said, “Why does not the man go
- somewhere where he is not known, instead of to the devil where
- he is known?”
-
- Hawthorne was in the same class at college with Longfellow,
- whom he says he could not appreciate at that time. He was
- always finely dressed and was a tremendous student. Hawthorne
- was careless in dress and no student, but always reading
- desultorily right and left. Now they are deeply appreciative of
- each other.[10]
-
- Hawthorne says he wants the North to beat now; ’tis the only
- way to save the country from destruction. He has been strangely
- inert and remote upon the subject of the war; partly from his
- deep hatred of everything sad. He seemed to feel as if he could
- not live and face it.
-
- He was intensely witty, but his wit is of so ethereal a texture
- that the fine essence has vanished and I can remember nothing
- now of his witty things!
-
-It would be a pity to truncate the following passage by confining the
-record of Fields’s day in Concord to his glimpse of Hawthorne, already
-recorded, with emendations, in the “Biographical Notes.”
-
-[Illustration: _From a letter of Hawthorne’s after a visit to Charles
-Street_]
-
- _Saturday, January 9, 1864._—J. T. F. passed yesterday in
- Concord. He went first to see Hawthorne, who was sitting alone
- gazing into the fire, his grey dressing-gown, which became him
- like a Roman toga, wrapped around his figure. He said he had
- done nothing for three weeks. Yet we feel his romance must be
- maturing in his mind. General Barlow and Mrs. Howe had sent
- word they were coming to call, so Mrs. Hawthorne had gone out
- to walk (been thrown out on picket-duty, Mrs. Stowe said) and
- had left word at home that Mr. Hawthorne was ill and could see
- no one. After his visit there, full of affectionate kindness,
- J. T. F. proceeded to dinner with the Emersons. Here too
- the reception was most hearty, but he fancied there were no
- servants to speak of at either house. Mrs. E. looked deadly
- pale, but her wit coruscated marvellously; even Mr. Emerson
- grew silent to listen. She said a committee of three, of
- which she was one, had been formed to pronounce upon certain
- essays (unpublished) of Mr. Emerson, which they thought should
- be printed now. She thought some of them finer than any of
- his published essays. He laughed a great deal at the fun she
- _poked_ at the earlier efforts.
-
- From there J. T. F. proceeded to see the Thoreaus. The mother
- and sister live well, but lonely it should seem, there without
- Henry. They produced 32 volumes of journal and a few letters.
- The idea was to print the letters. We hope it may be done.
- Their house was like a conservatory, it was so filled with
- plants in beautiful condition. Henry liked to have the doors
- thrown open that he might look at these during his illness. He
- was an excellent son, and even when living in his retirement at
- Walden Pond, would come home every day. He supported himself
- too from a very early age.
-
-Here follows a passage also used by Fields in “Yesterdays with Authors,”
-but in a rendering so moderated that the original entry in the journal is
-quite another thing.
-
- _Monday, March 28._—Mr. Hawthorne came down to take this as his
- first station on his journey for health. He shocked us by his
- invalid appearance. He has become quite deaf, too. His limbs
- are shrunken but his great eyes still burn with their lambent
- fire. He said, “Why does Nature treat us so like children! I
- think we could bear it if we knew our fate. At least I think it
- would not make much difference to me now what became of me.”
- He talked with something of his old wit at times; said, “Why
- has the good old custom of coming together to get drunk gone
- out? Think of the delight of drinking in pleasant company and
- then lying down to sleep a deep strong sleep.” Poor man! He
- sleeps very little. We heard him walking in his room during
- a long portion of the night, heavily moving, moving as if
- indeed waiting, watching for his fate. At breakfast he gave
- us a most singular account of an interview with Mr. Alcott.
- He said: “Alcott was one of the most excellent of men. He
- could never quarrel with anyone.” But the other day he came to
- make Mr. H. a call, to ask him if there was any difficulty or
- misunderstanding between the two families. Mr. Hawthorne said
- no, that would be impossible; “but I proceeded,” he continued,
- “to tell him it was not possible to live upon amicable terms
- with Mrs. Alcott.... The old man acknowledged the truth of all
- that I said (indeed who should know it better), but I comforted
- him by saying in time of illness or necessity I did not doubt
- we should be the best of helpers to each other. I clothed all
- this in velvet phrases, that it might not seem too hard for him
- to bear, but he took it all like a saint.”
-
- _April, 1864._—When Mr. Hawthorne returned after watching at
- the death-bed of Mr. Ticknor, his mind was in a healthier
- condition, we thought, than when he left, but the experience
- had been a terrible one. I can never forget the look of pallid
- exhaustion he wore the night he returned to us. He said he had
- scarcely eaten or slept since he left. “Mr. Childs watched
- me so closely after poor Ticknor died, as if I had lost my
- protector and friend, and so I had! But he stuck by as if he
- were afraid to leave me alone. He stayed past the dinner hour,
- and when I began to wonder if he never ate himself, he departed
- and sent another man to watch me till he should return!”
- Nevertheless he liked Mr. Childs and spoke repeatedly of his
- unwearying kindness. “I never saw anything like it,” he said;
- yet when he was abstractedly wondering where his slippers were,
- I overheard him say to himself, “Oh! I remember, that cursed
- Childs watched me so I forgot everything.”
-
- He spoke of the coldness of somebody and said, “Well, I think
- he would have felt something if he had been there!” He said he
- did not think death would be so terrible if it were not for the
- undertakers. It was dreadful to think of being handled by those
- men.
-
- He was often wholly overcome by the ludicrous view of something
- presented to him in the midst of his grief. There was a black
- servant sleeping in the room that last night, whose name was
- Peter. Once he snored loudly, when the dying man raised himself
- with an appreciation of fun still living in him and said, “Well
- done, Peter!”
-
-In every account of the last week of Hawthorne’s life, the shock he
-received through the illness and death of his friend and traveling
-companion, Ticknor, in Philadelphia, is an item of sombre moment. The two
-men had left Boston together late in March—Hawthorne, sick and broken,
-writing but once, in a tremulous hand, to his wife during the ill-starred
-journey; Ticknor, giving himself unstintingly to the restoration of
-Hawthorne’s health, and stricken unto death before a fortnight was gone.
-The circumstances are suggested in the entry that has just been quoted
-from Mrs. Fields’s journal. They stand still more clearly revealed in
-the last letter written by Hawthorne to Fields, who refers to it in
-“Yesterdays with Authors,” and adds that the news of Ticknor’s death
-reached Boston on the very day after this letter was written, all too
-evidently with a feeble hold upon the pen.
-
- PHILADELPHIA, CONTINENTAL HOTEL
-
- _Saturday morning_
-
- DEAR FIELDS:—
-
- I am sorry to say that our friend Ticknor is suffering under
- a severe billious attack since yesterday morning. He had
- previously seemed uncomfortable, but not to an alarming degree.
- He sent for a physician during the night, and fell into the
- hands of an allopathist, who, of course, belabored with pills
- and powders of various kinds, and then proceeded to cup, and
- poultice, and blister, according to the ancient rule of that
- tribe of savages. The consequence is that poor Ticknor is
- already very much reduced, while the disorder flourishes as
- luxuriantly as if that were the doctor’s sole object. He calls
- it a billious colic (or bilious, I know not which) and says it
- is one of the severest cases he ever knew. I think him a man of
- skill and intelligence, in his way, and doubt not that he will
- do everything that his views of scientific medicine will permit.
-
- Since I began writing the above, Mr. Bennett of Boston tells
- me the Doctor, after this morning’s visit, requested the
- proprietor of the Continental to telegraph to Boston the
- state of the case. I am glad of it, because it relieves me
- of the responsibility of either disclosing bad intelligence
- or withholding it. I will only add that Ticknor, under the
- influence of a blister and some powders, seems more comfortable
- than at any time since his attack, and that Mr. Bennett (who
- is an apothecary, and therefore conversant with these accursed
- matters) says that he is in a good state. But I can see that
- it will be not a very few days that will set him upon his legs
- again. As regards nursing, he shall have the best that can be
- obtained; and my own room is next to his, so that I can step in
- at any moment; but that will be of almost as much service as if
- a hippopotamus were to do him the same kindness. Nevertheless,
- I have blistered, and powdered, and pilled him and made my
- observation on medical science and the sad and comic aspects of
- human misery.
-
- Excuse this illegible scrawl, for I am writing almost in the
- dark. Remember me to Mrs. Fields. As regards myself, I almost
- forgot to say that I am perfectly well. If you could find time
- to write Mrs. Hawthorne and tell her so, it would be doing me
- a great favor, for I doubt whether I can find an opportunity
- just now to do it myself. You would be surprised to see how
- stalwart I have become in this little time.
-
- Your friend,
-
- N. H.
-
-Barely more than a month later, Hawthorne, traveling with another friend,
-Franklin Pierce, died in New Hampshire. Through the years that followed,
-the friendship of the Fieldses with his widow and children afforded many
-occasions for brief affectionate record in the chronicles of Charles
-Street.[11]
-
-The two entries that follow touch, respectively, upon glimpses of
-Hawthorne’s immediate family at Concord, in the summer of 1865, and of
-his surviving sister in the summer of 1866.
-
- _Sunday, July 9, 1865._—Passed Friday in Concord. Called at the
- Emersons, but were disappointed to find them all in town, Jamie
- particularly, who wished to tell him that his new essay on
- Character is not suited to the magazine. Ordinary readers would
- not understand him and would consider it blasphemous. He thinks
- it would do more good if delivered simply to his own disciples
- first, in a volume of new essays uniform with the others.
-
- Dined with Sophia Hawthorne and the children, the first real
- visit since that glorious presence has departed. What an
- altered household! She feels very lonely and is like a reed.
- I fear the children find small restraint from her. Poor
- child! How tired she is! Will God spare her further trial, I
- wonder, and take her to his rest?... Went to call on Sophia
- Thoreau.[12] ... We saw a letter from Froude, the historian, to
- H. T., as warmly appreciative as it was possible for a letter
- to be; also “long good histories,” as his sister said, from his
- admirer Cholmondely. His journal is in thirty-two volumes and
- when J. T. F. spoke of wishing for an editor to condense these,
- she said there was no hurry and she thought the man would come.
- We spoke of Sanborn. She said, “He knows a great deal, but I
- never associate him with my brother.”
-
- She is a woman borne down with ill health. She seemed to
- possess, as we saw her, something of the self-sustaining power
- of her brother, the same repose and confidence in her fate, as
- being always good. Dear S. H. says she has this when she thinks
- of her brother, but often loses it when the surface of her
- life becomes irritated and she is disabled for work. Her aged
- mother, learning we were there, got up and dressed herself and
- came down, to her daughter’s great surprise. She has an immense
- care in that old lady evidently.
-
- _July 24, 1866._—We left just before eleven for Amesbury, to
- see Mr. Whittier, driving over to Beverly in an open wagon. It
- was one of the perfect days. As Keats said once, the sky sat
- “upon our senses like a sapphire crown.” We turned away after
- a time from the high road into a wood path, picking our way
- somewhat slowly to avoid the overhanging bushes and the rainy
- pools left in the ruts. We soon found ourselves near a place
- called Mt. Serat where we knew Miss Hawthorne lived, the only
- surviving sister of Nathaniel, and Mr. Fields determined at
- once to call upon her. To my surprise, in spite of the fine
- weather and her woodland life habitually, she was at home, and
- came down immediately as if she were sincerely glad to see us.
- She is a small woman, with small fine features, round full
- face, fresh-looking in spite of years, brilliant eyes, nervous
- brow, which twists as she speaks, and very nervous fingers. In
- one respect she differed from her brother—she was exquisitely
- neat (nor do I mean to convey the idea by this that he was
- unneat, but he always gave you a sense of disregarded trifles
- about his person and we frequently recall his reply to me when
- I offered to brush his coat one morning, “No, no, I never brush
- my coat, it wears it out!”), and gave you a sense of being
- particular in little things. I seemed to see in her another
- difference—a deterioration because of too great solitude—powers
- rusted—a decaying beauty—while with Hawthorne solitude fed his
- genius, solitude and the pressure of necessity. Utter solitude
- lames the native power of a woman even more than that of a
- man, for her natural growth is through her sympathies. She is
- a woman of no common mould, however. Lucy Larcom calls her a
- hamadryad, and says she belongs in the woods and should be seen
- there. I wish to see her again upon her own ground. She asked
- us almost immediately if we would not come with her to the
- woods, but our time was too short. From thence we held our way,
- and soon came by train to Newburyport and Amesbury. Whittier
- was at home, ready with an enthusiastic welcome.
-
-To these memorials of Hawthorne must be added yet another, copied from a
-pencilled sheet preserved by Mrs. Fields in an envelope endorsed in her
-handwriting, “The original of a precious and extraordinary letter written
-by Mrs. Nathaniel Hawthorne while her husband lay dead.” Printed now, I
-believe for the first time, nearly sixty years after it was written, it
-rings with a devotion and exaltation which time is powerless to touch:
-
- I wish to speak to you, Annie.
-
- A person of a more uniform majesty never wore mortal form.
-
- In the most retired privacy it was the same as in the presence
- of men.
-
- The sacred veil of his eyelids he scarcely lifted to
- himself—such an unviolated sanctuary as was his nature, I, his
- inmost wife, never conceived nor knew.
-
- So absolute a modesty was not before joined to so lofty a
- self-respect.
-
- But what must have been that self-respect that he never in the
- smallest particular dishonored!
-
- A conscience more void of offense never bore witness to GOD
- within.
-
- It was the innocence of a baby and the grand comprehension of a
- sage.
-
- To me—himself—even to me who was himself in unity—he was to the
- last the holy of holies behind the cherubim.
-
- So unerring a judgment that a word from him would settle with
- me a chaos of doubts and questions that seemed perplexing to
- ordinary apprehension.
-
- So equal a justice that I often wondered if he were human in
- this—for this seemed to partake of omniscience both of love and
- insight.
-
- An impartiality of regard that solved all men and subjects in
- one alembick.
-
- Truth and right alone he deigned to regard. Far below him was
- every other consideration.
-
- A tenderness so infinite—so embracing—that GOD’S alone could
- surpass it. It folded the loathsome leper in as soft a caress
- as the child of his home affections—was not that divine!
-
- Was it not Christianity in one action! What a bequest to his
- children—what a new revelation of Christ to the world was
- that! And for him—whom the sight and touch of unseemliness and
- uncleanness caused to shudder as an Eolian string shudders in
- the tempest.
-
- Annie! to the last action in this house he was as lofty, as
- majestic, as imperial and as gentle—as in the strength of his
- prime, as on the day he rose upon my eye and soul a King among
- men by divine right!
-
- When he awoke that early dawn and found himself unawares
- standing among the “Shining Ones” do you think they did not
- suppose he had been always with them—one of themselves? Oh,
- blessed be GOD for so soft a translation—as an infant wakes
- on its mother’s breast so he woke on the bosom of GOD and can
- never be weary any more, nor see nor touch an unclean thing.
- A demand for beauty and perfection that was inexorable. Yet
- though a flaw or a crack gave him so fine agony, no one, no one
- was ever so tolerant as he!
-
-Hawthorne’s allusion to Alcott brings the figure of that Concord
-personage on the scene. The picture of him in Charles Street is so
-sharpened in outline by certain remarks upon him by the elder Henry
-James, a somewhat more frequent visitor, that the passages relating to
-the two men are here joined together. The first recorded glimpses of
-James occurred in the course of a visit to Newport.
-
- _September 23, 1863._—Received a visit at Newport from Henry
- James. His son was badly wounded in two places at Gettysburg.
- He spoke of the reviews of his work among other topics. “Who
- wrote the review in the Examiner?” asked Mr. F. “Oh! that was
- _merely_ Freeman Clarke,” he replied; “he is a smuggler in
- theology and feels towards me much as a contraband towards an
- exciseman.” Speaking of fashion, he said, “there was good in
- it,” although it appears to be a drawback to the residents here
- while it lasts. He anticipates a change in European affairs;
- the age of ignorance is to pass away and strong democratic
- tendencies will soon pervade Europe. The march of civilization
- will work its revenge against aristocratic England, he believes.
-
- Mr. James considers that people make a mistake to expect
- reason from Carlyle. “He is an artist, a wilful artist, and no
- reasoner. He has only genius.”
-
- _October 16, 1863._—Mr. Alcott breakfasted with us. He said
- all vivid new life was well described by his daughter Louisa.
- She was happier now that she had made a success. “She was
- formerly not content to wait, but so soon as she became
- content, then good fortune came, as she always does.” I told
- him we enjoyed deeply reading his MSS. of “The Rhapsodist”
- (Emerson) last night. He said he thought it was finally brought
- into presentable shape! “When in a more imperfect condition,”
- he continued, “I read it to Mr. Emerson. The modest man could
- only keep silent at such a time, but he conveyed to me the
- idea that he should prefer the paper should not be printed in
- the ‘Commonwealth.’ Later I again read it, when he said, ‘If I
- were dead.’ I have reason to believe that in its present shape
- he would not object to its presentation.”[13] He talked of his
- own valuable library and asked what he should do with it by and
- by. J. T. F. suggested it should go to the Union Club, which
- pleased him much. “That is the place,” said he. “If it were
- known this was my intention, might I not also be entitled to
- consideration at the Club?”
-
- Among his books is a copy of Milton’s “World of Words,” owned
- by Sir Ferdinand Gorges, who early colonized the state of Maine.
-
- He talked of Thoreau. “There will be seven or eight volumes of
- his works. Next should come the letters, with the commendatory
- poems prefixed. Come up to Concord and we will talk it over.
- If you go to see Miss Thoreau, arrange to talk with her in the
- absence of the mother, who would interrupt and speak again of
- the whole matter. Make Helen[14] feel that Henry will receive
- as much for his books as if he had made his own bargain, for he
- was good at a bargain and they are a little hard—that is, they
- do not understand all the bearings of many subjects.”
-
- The good old man has come to Boston, being asked to perform
- funeral ceremonies over the bodies of two children. He asked
- for my Vaughan. “A beautiful poem which is not known is much
- at such a time,” he observed inquiringly. To which I heartily
- responded.
-
- Mr. Emerson came in to see Mr. Fields today. “I shall
- reconsider my reluctance to have Mr. Alcott’s article published
- provided he will obtain consideration by it,” was his generous
- speech. He said he had begun to prepare a new volume of poems,
- “but I must go down the harbor before I can finish a little
- poem about the islands. I took steamboat yesterday and went
- down, but a mist came up and my visit was to no purpose.”
-
- _February 19, 1864._—This morning early called upon Mrs. Mott
- of Pennsylvania. Found Mr. James with her. He observed that
- circumstances had placed him above want, and inheritance
- had given him a position in the world which precluded his
- having any knowledge of the temptations which beset many men.
- His virtues were the result of his position rather than of
- character—an affair of temperament. He said society was to
- blame for much of the crime in it, and as for that poor young
- man who committed the murder at Malden, it was a mere fact of
- temperament or inheritance. He soon broke off his talk, saying
- it was “pretty well to be caught in the middle of such weighty
- topics in the presence of two ladies at 10 o’clock in the
- morning.” Then we talked of houses. He wishes a furnished house
- for a year in Boston until his departure.
-
- _July 28._—Still hot, with a russet sun. Mr. and Mrs. Henry
- James called in the evening. He talked of “Sterling.” “He
- was not stereotyped, but living, his eye burned; he was very
- vivacious, although he saw Death approaching. He was one of the
- choicest of friends.” Afterward he talked of Alcott’s visit to
- Carlyle. Carlyle told Mr. James he found him a terrible old
- bore. It was almost impossible to be rid of him, and impossible
- also to keep him, for he would not eat what was set before him.
- Carlyle had potatoes for breakfast and sent for strawberries
- for Mr. Alcott, who, when they arrived, took them with the
- potatoes upon the same plate, where the two juices ran together
- and fraternized. This shocked Carlyle, who would eat nothing
- himself, but stormed up and down the room instead. “Mrs.
- Carlyle is a naughty woman,” said Mr. J., “she wishes to make
- a sensation and does not mind sometimes following and imitating
- her husband’s way.” Mr. J. said Alcott once made him a visit
- in New York and when he found he could not go to Brooklyn to
- attend Mr. A.’s “conversation,” the latter said, “Very well; he
- would talk over the heads with him then before it was time to
- go.” They got into a great battle about the premises, during
- which Mr. Alcott talked of the Divine paternity as relating to
- himself, when Mr. James broke in with, “My dear sir, you have
- not found your _maternity_ yet. You are an egg half hatched.
- The shells are yet sticking about your head.” To this Mr. A.
- replied, “Mr. James, you are _damaged goods_ and will come up
- _damaged goods in eternity_.”
-
- We laughed much before they left at a story about a man who
- called to ask money of John Jacob Astor. The gentleman was
- ushered into a twilight library, where he fancied himself
- alone until he heard a grunt from a deep chair, the high back
- of which was turned towards him; then the gentleman advanced,
- found Mr. Astor there and saluted him. He opened the business
- of the subscription to him, and was about to unfold the paper
- when Mr. Astor suddenly cried out, “Oo—oo—oo—ooooooo!” “What
- is the matter, my dear sir,” said he, “are you ill? [growing
- alarmed] Where is the bell? Let me ring the bell.” Then running
- to the door, he shouted, “Madame, madame.” Then to Mr. Astor,
- “Pray, sir, what is the matter?” “Oo—oo—oo.” “Have you a pain
- in your side!!” In a moment the household came running thither,
- and as the housekeeper bent over him, he cried, “Oo—oo—these
- horrid wretches sending to me for money!!” As may be believed,
- our friend of the subscription paper beat a hasty retreat and
- here ended also our evening.
-
-A few days later there was an evening with Sumner and others, who talked
-of affairs in Washington. Mr. and Mrs. James were of the company. “These
-men,” wrote Mrs. Fields, “despond with regard to the civil government.
-They have more faith that our military affairs are doing well. Chiefly
-they look to Sherman as the great man. Mr. James was silent; he believes
-in Lincoln.” And there is the final note: “We must not forget Mr. James’s
-youth, who was ‘aninted with isle of Patmos.’”
-
- _July 10, 1866._—Forceythe Willson came and talked purely,
- lovingly, and like the pure character he aspires to be. He said
- Mr. Alcott talked with him of temperaments lately, with much
- wisdom. He said the blonde was nearest to perfection, that
- was the heavenly type. “You are not a blonde,” said the seer
- calmly, and, said Willson to me, “I was much amused and pleased
- too; for when I regarded the old man more closely I discovered
- _he_ himself was a blonde.”
-
- _October 6, 1867._—Mr. Henry James and his daughter came to
- call. We chanced to ask him about Dr. G—— of New York, a
- physician of wide reputation in the diagnosis of disease. He
- is an old man now, but with so large a practice that he will
- see no new patients. Mr. James says, however, that he is a
- humbug, that is, as I understood. He is a man of discernment
- which he turns to the best account, but not a man of deep
- insight or unwonted development. Suddenly J. remembered that
- there was once a Dr. —— of New York who was also famous. The
- moment his name was mentioned Mr. James became quite a new man.
- His enthusiasm flamed. Dr. —— died at the early age of 38,
- and, according to the saying of the world, insane. “Yet he was
- no more insane than I am at this moment as far as the action
- of his mind was concerned, which was always perfectly clear.
- Several years before his death he was pursued by spirits which
- often kept him awake all night. His wife was a heavenly woman
- and a Swedenborgian. The spirits did not come to her, but she
- was persuaded that they did come to him. They so disturbed
- his life that he used to say he was ready to die, in order
- to pursue his tormentors and ferret out the occasion of his
- trouble. At one time they told him that in every age a man had
- been selected to do the bidding of the Lord God, to be the Lord
- Christ of the time, and he must fit himself to be that man.
- They prescribed for him therefore certain fasts and austerities
- which he religiously fulfilled, only asking in return an
- interview in which some sign should be given him. They promised
- faithfully, but when the time arrived it was postponed; and
- this occurred repeatedly, until he felt sure of the deceit of
- the parties concerned.”
-
- Through the medium of these spirits Dr. —— became at length
- estranged from his wife. He went West to obtain a divorce,
- and while on this strange errand occurred a breach between
- himself and Mr. James. The latter wrote him a letter urging
- him away from the dead, which the doctor took as interference.
- The poor man returned to New York and at length shot himself.
- His wife never harbored the least animosity against him for
- his undeserved treatment. (Mr. J. looked like an invalid, but
- was full of spirit and kindness. He not infrequently speaks
- severely of men and things. Analysis is his second nature.)
-
- _March 5, 1869._—Jamie had an unusually turbulent and exciting
- day, and was thoroughly weary when night came. Henry James came
- first, and had gone so far as to abuse Emerson pretty well
- when the latter came in. “How do you do, Emer-son,” he said,
- with his peculiar intonation and voice, as if he had expected
- him on the heels of what had gone before. Mr. James calls his
- new book, “The Secret of Swedenborg.” Jamie thinks his article
- on Carlyle too abusive, especially as he stayed in his house,
- or was there long and familiarly. But his love of country was
- bitterly stung by Carlyle in “Shooting Niagara and After.”
-
- _Saturday, March 13, 1869._—Mr. Emerson read in the afternoon.
- The subject was Wordsworth in chief, but the time was far too
- short to do justice to the notes he had made. In the evening we
- went to Cambridge to hear Mr. James read his paper on “Woman.”
- We took tea first with the family and afterward listened to
- the lecture. He took the highest, the most natural, and the
- most religious point of view from which I have heard the
- subject discussed. He dealt metaphysically with it, after his
- own fashion, showing the subtle inherent counterparts of man
- to woman, showing to what extremes either would be led without
- the other. He spoke with unmingled disgust of the idea of
- woman, except for union in behalf of some charity for the time,
- forsaking the sanctity and privacy of her home to battle and
- unsex herself in the hot and dusty arena of the world.
-
- (The members of the Woman’s Club asked him to write this
- lecture for them. He did not wish to spare the time, but
- promised to do so if they would invite him afterward to deliver
- it in public. They disliked the lecture so much that, although
- they _did_ send him a public invitation, there were but twenty
- people present.)
-
- Nothing could be holier or more inspiring than his ideal of
- womanhood. She is the embodied social idea, the genius of home,
- the light of life—“ever desiring novelty her life without man
- would be a long chase from one field to another, accompanied by
- _soft gospel truth_.”
-
- He didn’t fail to whip the “pusillanimous” clergy, and as the
- room was overstocked with them, it was odd to watch the effect.
- Mr. James is perfectly brave, almost inapprehensive, of the
- storm of opinion he raises, and he is quite right. Nothing
- could be more clearly his own and inherent, than his views in
- this lecture, nothing which the times need more. He helps to
- lay that dreadful phantom of yourself which appears now and
- then conjured up by the right people, haranguing the crowd and
- endeavoring to be something for which you were clearly never
- intended by Heaven. I think I shall never forget a pretty
- little niece of Mrs. Dale Owen, who was with her at the first
- Club meeting in New York. Her face was full of softness and
- Madonna-like beauty, but she was learning to contract her brow
- over ideas and become “strong” in her manner of expressing
- them. It was a kind of nightmare.
-
- _Summer, 1871._—Mr. Alcott, Mr. Howison, Mr. Harris, the latter
- two lovers of philosophy, have been here this week. Channing is
- still writing poems in Concord, says Alcott. The latter smiles
- blandly at his own former absurdities, but he does not eat
- meat, and continues his ancient manner of living among books.
- The old gentleman gave me this wild rose as he went away. He
- quoted Vaughan, talked of a book of selections he would wish to
- see made, “a honey-pot into which one might dip at leisure,”
- also an almanac suitable for a lady, of the choicest things
- among the ancient writers. He was full of good sayings and most
- witty and attractive. He is somewhat deaf, but he bears this
- infirmity as he has borne all the ills of life with a mild
- sweet heroism most marked and worthy of love and to be copied.
-
- _Sunday, April 20, 1873._—Last night Mr. and Mrs. Henry James,
- Alice, and Mr. DeNormandie dined here. Mr. James looked very
- venerable, but was at heart very young and amused us much. He
- gave a description of Mr. George Bradford being run over by the
- horse-car, because of his own inadvertence in part, and of the
- good-natured crowd who insisted upon his having restitution for
- what he considered, in part, at least, his own fault. “Ain’t
- you dead?” said one. “267 Highland Ave. is the number, don’t
- forget,” said another; “you can prosecute.” “Where’s my hat?”
- he asked meekly. “Better ask if ye’re not dead, and not be
- looking for your hat,” said another.
-
- He also told us of a visit of Elizabeth Peabody to the Alcotts.
- He said: “In Mr. A. the moral sense was wholly dead, and the
- æsthetic sense had never yet been born!”
-
-It may well have been after a visit to the Fieldses at the seashore town
-of Manchester that Henry James wrote this undated characteristic note
-which embodies the feeling of many another guest:—
-
- MY DEAR FIELDS:—
-
- Pride ever goes before a fall. I scorned my wife’s solicitude
- about her umbrella as unworthy of an immortal mind, and now I
- am reduced to pleading with you to preserve my lost implement
- in that line, and when you next come to town to bring it with
- you and leave it for me at Williams’ book store, corner of
- School Street, where I will reclaim it.
-
- Alas! The difference between now and then! Such an atmosphere
- as we are having this morning! And yet we did not need the
- contrast to impress us with a lively sense of the lovely house,
- the lovely scenes, and the lovely people we had left. We came
- home fragrant with the sweetest memories, and the way we have
- been making the house resound with the fame of our enjoyment
- would amuse you. Alice and her aunt came home just after us,
- and we have done nothing but talk since we arrived. Good bye;
- give my love to that angelic woman, whom I shall remember in my
- last visions, and believe me, faithfully,
-
- Yours also,
-
- H. J.
-
-Henry James’s letters to Mr. and Mrs. Fields, of which a number are
-preserved by the present generation of the James family, abound in
-characteristic felicities. In one of them—they are nearly all undated—he
-regrets his inability to read a lecture of his own at Mrs. Fields’s
-invitation, on the ground that his unpublished writings are “all too
-grave and serious, not for you individually indeed, but for those
-‘slumberers in Zion’ who are apt, you know, to constitute the bulk of a
-parlour audience.” In another he is evidently declining an invitation to
-hear a reading of Emerson’s in Charles Street:—
-
- SWAMPSCOTT, _May 11_
-
- MY DEAR MRS. FIELDS:—
-
- My wife—who has just received your kind note in rapid route to
- the Dedham Profane Asylum, or something of that sort—begs leave
- to say, through me as a willing and sensitive medium, that you
- are one of those _arva beata_, renowned in poetry, which, visit
- them never so often, one is always glad to revisit, which are
- attractive in all seasons by their own absolute light, and
- without any Emersonian pansies and buttercups to make them
- so. This enthusiastic Dedhamite says further, in effect, that
- while one is deeply grateful for your courteous offer of a
- seat upon your sofa to hear the Concord sage, she yet prefers
- the material banquet you summon us to in your dining-room,
- since there we should be out of the mist and able to discern
- between nature and cookery, between what eats and what is
- eaten at all events, and feel a thankful mind that we were
- in solid comfortable Charles Street, instead of the vague,
- wide, weltering galaxy, and should be sure to deem Annie and
- Jamie (_I_ am sure of Annie, I think my wife feels equally
- sure of Jamie) lovelier fireflies than ever sparkled in the
- cold empyrean. But alas, who shall control his destiny? Not
- my wife, whom multitudinous cares enthrall; nor yet myself,
- whom a couple of months’ enforced illness now constrains to a
- preternatural activity, lest the world fail of salvation....
-
- P. S. Who _did_ contrive the comical title for his
- lecture—“Philosophy of the People”? I suspect it was a joke
- of J. T. F. It would be no less absurd for Emerson himself to
- think of philosophizing than it would be for the rose to think
- of botanizing. Emerson is the Divinely pompous rose of the
- philosophic garden, gorgeous with colour and fragrance. What
- a sad lookout there would be for tulip and violet and lily
- and the humble grape, if the rose should turn out philosophic
- gardener as well! Philosophy _of the people_, too! But that was
- Fields, or else it was only R. W. E. after dining with F. at
- the Union Club and becoming demoralized.
-
-The final paragraph of a single other note suggests in sum the relation
-between James and his Charles Street friends:—
-
- Speaking of Mr. Fields always reminds me of various things
- so richly endowed in the creature in all good gifts; but the
- dominant consideration in my mind associated with him is his
- beautiful home and there chiefly that atmosphere and faultless
- womanly worth and dignity which fills it with light and warmth
- and makes it a real blessing to one’s heart every time he falls
- within its precincts. Please felicitate the wretch for me, and
- believe me, my dear Mrs. Fields,
-
- Your true friend and servant,
-
- H. J.
-
- _July 8._
-
-Though not related either to Alcott or to Henry James, the following
-entry, on October 16, 1863, should be preserved—and as well in this place
-as in another. It refers to the second of the three Josiah Quincys who
-were mayors of Boston in the course of the nineteenth century.
-
- Mr. Josiah Quincy dropped in to see J. T. F. He had lately
- been traveling in the West, he said. People complimented
- him upon his youthful appearance and his last letter to the
- President. “I am glad you liked the letter,” he said, “but my
- father wrote it.” At the next town people pressed his hand,
- and thanked him for his staunch adherence to the Anti-slavery
- cause as expressed in the “Liberator.” “Oh,” his reply was,
- “that was my brother Edmund Quincy”; a little farther on a
- friend complimented his brilliant story in the last “Atlantic”
- magazine. “That was by my son J. P. Quincy,” he was obliged to
- answer. Finally, when his exploits in the late wars at the head
- of the 20th Regiment were recounted, he grew impatient, said it
- was his son Colonel Quincy, but he thought it high time he came
- home, instead of travelling about to receive the compliments of
- others.
-
-In giving the title, “Glimpses of Emerson,” to one of the chapters in
-her “Authors and Friends,” Mrs. Fields described accurately the use she
-made of her records and remembrances of that serene Olympian who glided
-in and out of Boston to the awe and delight of those with whom he came
-into personal contact. “Olympian” must be the word, since “Augustan”
-connotes something quite too mundane to suggest the effect produced by
-Emerson upon his sympathetic contemporaries. Did they realize, I wonder,
-how fitting it was that this prophet of the harmonies of life should
-live in a place the name of which is spoken by all but New Englanders
-as if it signified not a despairing _Væ victis_, but the very bond of
-peace? All the adjectives of benignity have been bestowed upon Emerson.
-Mrs. Fields’s “Glimpses” of him suggest that atmosphere, as of mountain
-solitudes, in which he moved; that air of the heights which those who
-moved beside him were fain to breathe. His “Conversations” in public
-and private places, a form of intellectual refreshment suggested by
-Mrs. Fields and conducted, to Emerson’s large material advantage, by
-her husband, appear to-day as highly characteristic of their time,—the
-sixties and seventies,—and the light thrown upon them by her journal
-illuminates not only him and her, but the whole society of “superior
-persons” in which Emerson was so dominating a figure. By no means all of
-that light escaped from her manuscript journals to the printed page of
-“Authors and Friends.” In the hitherto unprinted passages now given there
-are further shafts of it, sometimes slender in themselves, but joining to
-show the very Emerson that came and went in Charles Street.
-
-[Illustration: EMERSON
-
-_From the marble statue by Daniel Chester French in the Concord Public
-Library_]
-
-There was a furtive humor in Emerson, which expressed itself more
-accurately in his own words than in anything written about him. A
-pleasant trace of it is found in a note to Fields addressed, “My dear
-Editor,” dated “Concord, October 5, 1866,” and containing these words: “I
-have the more delight in your marked overestimate of my poem, that I had
-been vexed with a belief that what skill I had in whistling was nearly
-or quite gone, and that I must henceforth content myself with guttural
-consonants or dissonants, and not attempt warbling.”
-
-There is a clear application of the Emersonian philosophy to domestic
-matters in a letter written by Mrs. Emerson to Mrs. Fields, a week after
-the fire which drove the poet’s family from his house at Concord, in
-the summer of 1872. Mrs. Fields—as if in fulfillment of Emerson’s words
-on the proffer of some previous hospitality: “Indeed we think that your
-house should have that name inscribed upon it—‘Hospitality’”—had invited
-the dislodged Emersons to take refuge under her roof. Mrs. Emerson,
-replying, wrote:—
-
- We are most happily settled in the “Old Manse,” where our
- cousin, Miss Ripley, assures us we can be accommodated—to her
- satisfaction as well as our own—until our house is rebuilt.
- Only the upper half is destroyed and we shall, I trust, so
- well restore it that you will not know—when we shall have
- the pleasure of welcoming you there—except for its fresh
- appearance, that anything has happened. I should not use
- such a word as “calamity,” for truly the whole event is a
- blessing rather than a misfortune. We have received such warm
- expressions of kindness from our friends, and have witnessed
- such disinterested action and brave daring in our town’s
- people, that we feel—in addition to our happiness in the
- sympathy of friends in other places—as if Concord was a large
- family of personal friends and well-wishers. They command not
- only our gratitude but our deep respect, for their loving and
- personal self-forgetfulness.
-
- Mr. Emerson and Ellen join me in affectionate and grateful
- acknowledgments to yourself and to Mr. Fields.
-
- Ever your friend,
-
- LILIAN EMERSON
-
- CONCORD, _July 31, 1872_.
-
-It is in the atmosphere of the mutual relation revealed in many letters
-from Emerson and his household to Mr. and Mrs. Fields that the following
-reports of encounters with him—a few out of many similar passages in her
-journals—should be read.
-
- _December 3, 1863._—Last Tuesday Mr. Emerson lectured in town.
- Mrs. E. and Edith came to tea. She was troubled because she
- was a little late. She is a woman of proud integrity and real
- sweetness. She has an awe of words. They mean so much to her
- that her lips do not unlock save for truth or kindliness or
- beauty or wisdom. The lecture was for today—there was much of
- Carlyle, chastisement, and soul. After the lecture they came
- home with us and about 20 friends. Wendell Phillips was in
- his sweetest mood. He spoke of Beecher and Luther and of the
- vigorous, healthy hearts of these men who swayed this world.
- He said Hallam speaks disparagingly of Luther. I could not but
- think of Sydney Smith’s friend who spoke “disparagingly of the
- Equator.” Alden too came in wearied after his lecture. Senator
- Boutwell spoke in praise of life in Washington, the first man.
- Sunshiny Edith passed the night with us.
-
- _January 5, 1864._—Mr. Emerson came today to see J. T. F. He
- says Mr. Blake, who holds the letters of Thoreau in his hands,
- is a terribly conscientious man, “a man who would even return
- a borrowed umbrella.” He became acquainted with Blake when
- he was connected with theological matters, “and he believed
- wholly in me at that time, but one day he met Thoreau and he
- never came to my house afterwards. His conscientiousness is
- equalled perhaps by that of George Bradford, who accompanied
- us once to hear Mr. Webster speak. There was an immense crowd,
- Mr. Bradford became separated from the party, and was swept
- into a capital place within the lines. When he found himself
- well ensconced in front of the speaker, he turned about and saw
- us, and with a look of great concern said: ‘I have no ticket
- for this place and I can’t stay.’ We besought him not to be so
- foolish as to give up the place, but nothing would tempt him to
- keep it.”
-
- He was in fine mood.
-
- _Wednesday, September 6._—Mr. Emerson went to see Mr. Fields.
- “There are fine lines in Lowell’s Ode,” he said. “Yes,”
- answered J. T. F., “it is a fine poem.” “I have found fine
- lines in it,” replied the seer. “I told Lowell once,” he
- continued, “that his humorous poems gave me great pleasure;
- they were worth all his serious poetry. He did not take it very
- well, but muttered, ‘The Washers of the Shroud,’ and walked
- away.”
-
- J. T. F. found Emerson sitting by the window in his new office,
- highly delighted with it.
-
- _September 30, 1865._—Jamie went to dine with the Saturday
- Club. Professor Nichol was his guest. Sam. Ward (Julia’s
- brother) was Longfellow’s. Lowell, Holmes, Hoar, Emerson and
- a few others only were present. Judge Hoar related an amusing
- anecdote of having sent a beautiful basket of pears to the
- Concord exhibition this year. He said Mr. Emerson was one of
- the judges, and he thought he would be pleased with the pears
- because a few years ago he was in the garden one day and,
- observing that very tree, which was not then very flourishing,
- had told Judge Hoar that more iron and more animal matter were
- needed in the soil. “Forthwith,” said the Judge, “I planted
- all my old iron kettles and a cat and a dog at the foot of the
- tree and these pears were the result. I have kept two favorite
- terriers ready to plant if necessary beside, but the fruit for
- the present seems well enough without them.”
-
- Judge Hoar said also that he knew a man once with a prodigious
- memory; before dinner he could recall General Washington, after
- dinner he remembered Christopher Columbus!
-
- _Saturday, October 7, 1865._—Tuesday, 3, Edith Emerson was
- married to William Forbes. The old house threw wide its
- hospitable doors and the stairway and rooms were covered with
- leaves and flowers and the whole place was as beautiful as
- earthly radiance and joy can make a home. Poor Mrs. Hawthorne,
- laden with her many sorrows, threw off her black robe for that
- day that she might rejoice with others. Edith made her own
- marriage wreath, and even Mr. Emerson wore white gloves. Old
- Mrs. Ripley and many aged and many beautiful persons were there.
-
-In 1866 Emerson, long exiled from the good graces of his Alma Mater,
-was restored to them by the bestowal of an honorary degree. In 1867 the
-restoration was completed by his election as an Overseer of Harvard
-College and his appearance, after an interval of thirty years, as the Phi
-Beta Kappa orator. In this capacity he read his address on the “Progress
-of Culture” on July 18, 1867. Of the manner in which he did it, and
-of the effect he produced on his hearers, Lowell wrote immediately to
-Norton, in a letter often quoted, “He boggled, he lost his place, he had
-to put on his glasses; but it was as if a creature from some fairer world
-had lost his way in our fogs, and it was _our_ fault, not his.” “Phi
-Beta Day” was still a local festival of much brilliance, which was thus
-reflected in 1867 on the pages of Mrs. Fields’s journal.
-
- _Thursday, July 18, 1867._—Arose at five and worked in my
- garden until breakfast. Then it was time to dress for Phi Beta
- at Cambridge. We drove out, leaving home at nine o’clock.
- We expected Professor Andrew D. White to go with us, but he
- called still earlier to say he had been summoned to a business
- meeting by President Hill. The day was soft and pleasant with
- a clouded sky. We were among the first on the ground, but we
- had the pleasure of waiting a few moments to see our friends
- arrive before we were admitted to the church. Only ladies went
- in. I went with Mrs. Quincy, the poet’s[15] wife (poet for
- the day, for he is apt to disclaim this title usually), and
- we found good places in the gallery; by and by, however, Mrs.
- Dana beckoned to me to come and sit with them, so I changed
- my seat to a place on the lower floor. It was an impressive
- sight to see those men come in (though they kept us waiting
- until twelve o’clock)—Lowell, Emerson, Dana, Hale, and all
- the good brave men we have with few exceptions. First came
- Quincy’s poem, then Mr. Emerson’s address—both excellent after
- the manner of the men. Poor Mr. E.’s MSS. was in inextricable
- confusion, and in spite of the chivalry of E. E. Hale, who
- hunted up a cushion that he might see better, the whole matter
- seemed at first out of joint in the reader’s eyes. However
- that may have been, it was far from out of joint in our eyes,
- being noble in aim and influence, magnetic, imaginative. I
- felt grateful that I had lived till that moment and as if I
- might come home to live and work better. Thank Heaven for such
- a master! He was evidently put out and angry with himself for
- his disorder and, taking Mr. Fields’s arm as he came from the
- assembly, had to be somewhat reassured that it was not an utter
- failure.
-
- Mrs. Dana tried to carry me to lunch, most kindly. I could not
- make up my mind to go anywhere after what I had heard, but
- for a moment to see if the good Jameses were well, and thence
- homeward. It seemed, if I could ever work, it must be then.
-
- At half-past six Jamie returned from the dinner, where J. R.
- Lowell presided in the most elegant and brilliant manner. In
- calling out Agassiz he told the story of the sailor who was
- swallowed by a whale and finding time rather heavy on his
- hands thought he would inscribe his name on the bridge of bone
- above his head; but looking for a place, jack-knife in hand,
- he found that Jonah was before him—so he said Agassiz, etc.
- And of Holmes he said that the Professor and himself were like
- two buckets in a well: when one of them presided at a dinner,
- the other made it a point to bring a poem; when one bucket came
- up full, the other went down empty. And so on through all.
- Phillips Brooks, the distinguished preacher of Philadelphia,
- was there, and many other men of note.
-
-Out of the many notes relating to Emerson’s lectures, a few passages may
-be taken as typical. Perhaps the best unpublished pages are those on
-which the philosopher is seen, with his wife and daughter, against the
-social background of the time and place.
-
- _October 19, 1868._—The weeks spin away so fast I have no
- time for records, and yet last Sunday and Monday we had two
- pleasant parties, especially Monday, after Mr. Emerson’s first
- lecture. We were 14 at supper. Mrs. Putnam and Miss Oakey
- among the guests, but the Emersons, who are always pleased
- and always full of kindliness, enjoyment, and Christianity, I
- believe give more pleasure than they receive wherever they are
- entertained. Edward is full of his grape-culture in Milton,
- Ellen full of good works, Mrs. Emerson very hot against her
- brother’s opponents, Morton and those who take sides with him
- now that Morton himself is in the earth-mould first.[16] Mr.
- Emerson, alive and alert on all topics, talked openly of the
- untruthfulness of the Peabodys, of the beauty of “Charles
- Auchester,” of Mr. Alcott’s school, of Dana’s politics as
- superior perhaps to Butler and yet not altogether sound and
- worthy, conservatism being so deep in his blood.
-
- Thursday we drove our friends to Milton Blue Hill after the
- Emersons had gone, returned to dine and Selwyn’s theatre in the
- evening. Herman Merivale was of the party—son of Thackeray’s
- friend. The Stephens went on Wednesday. Thursday we dined in
- Milton with Mrs. Silsbee; it was a wet nasty day. Friday,
- Saturday and Sunday we were quietly enough here, Jamie with a
- fearful cold. Surely all this is unimportant enough as regards
- ourselves; but I like to remember when Mr. Emerson came and
- what he said and how he looked, for it is a pure benediction to
- see him and I honor and love him.
-
- _February 20, 1869._—Heard Emerson again, and Laura was with
- me; we drank up every word eagerly. He read Donne, Daniel, and
- especially Herbert; also _vers de société_; the facility of
- these old divines giving them a power akin to what has produced
- these familiar rhymes.
-
- He said Herbert was full of holy quips; fond of using a kind of
- irony towards God, and quoted appropriately. Beautiful things
- of Herrick, too, he read, but treated Vaughan rather unjustly,
- we thought.
-
- Lowell sat just behind; I could imagine his running commentary
- on many of Mr. Emerson’s remarks, which were often more
- Emersonian than universal, or true. The facility of the old
- poets seemed to impress him with almost undue reverence. He is
- extremely natural and easy in manner and speech during these
- readings. He bent his brows and shut his eyes, endeavoring
- to recall a passage from Ben Jonson as if we were at his own
- dinner-table, and at last when he gave it up said, “It is all
- the more provoking as I do not doubt many a friend here might
- help me out with it.”
-
- His respect for literature, often in these degenerate
- days smiled upon from some imaginary hills by surrounding
- multitudes, is absolute and regnant. It is religion and life,
- and he reiterating them in every form.
-
-The first and second of the “Conversations” arranged for Emerson by
-Fields are duly described in the journal. In the evening that followed
-the second, Emerson and his daughter dined at Charles Street, in company
-with Longfellow and his daughter Alice, William Morris Hunt and his wife,
-Dr. Holmes, and the Fieldses. The scene and talk were recorded by the
-hostess.
-
- ... Coming home, Ellen’s trunk had not arrived, so she came,
- like a good child, most difficult in a woman grown, to dinner
- in her travelling dress. Alice Longfellow looked very pretty in
- a polonaise of lovely olive brown over black; a little feather
- of the same color in her hair. Rooshue [Mrs. Hunt] and her
- husband came in their everydays too. I wore a lilac polonaise
- with a yellow rose—I speak of the latter because it seemed to
- please W. M. Hunt to see the dash of color....
-
- Hunt convulsed us with a story of seeing a man run through by
- an iron bolt, when a distinguished physician is called in; the
- physician asks if he can sleep well, and a thousand and one
- questions of like relevancy, to all of which the patient only
- replies by gasps of agony. Hunt acted the whole scene famously.
- The sunset too delighted him as it gilded the old sheds back of
- the house and made them “like Solomon’s temple.” Longfellow has
- written to Miss Rossetti, the author of the “Shadow of Dante,”
- to thank her for her pleasant book. He asks her the difficult
- question why Dante puts Venus nearest the sun. Also he points
- out her fault of saying the spirits of the blest inhabited the
- planets, whereas Dante clearly states that they all lived in
- one heaven but visited the planets.
-
- The truth of Hawthorne’s tale of the minister with the black
- veil was hunted up. His name was Moody and he was one of the
- Emerson family. It seems the poor man in his youth shot a boy
- by accident, and as he grew older a morbid temper settled upon
- him and he did not think himself fit to preach; so he withdrew
- from the ministry but taught a small school, always wore a
- black veil, literally a handkerchief. Ellen said her aunt was
- taught by him and she appeared anxious to set the matter right.
- Rose Hawthorne and her husband have been to see Mr. Emerson,
- and he likes them both well; thinks Rose looks happy and the
- young man promising, which is much. There is hope of Una’s
- recovery and return.
-
- After dinner, we ladies looked over manuscripts for a time
- until Longfellow went—when Mrs. Hunt went to the piano and
- played and sang. Finally he came, and they sang their little
- duets together and afterward she sang a song with words by
- Channing about a pine tree, set to a scrap of a sonata by
- Helen Bell, and after that a touching German song with English
- words—then she read Celia’s [Mrs. Thaxter’s] new poem to Mr.
- Emerson, called “The Tryst.” She read it only pretty well,
- which disgusted her; and she said it reminded her of William’s
- reading, which was the worst she ever knew; he could literally
- stop in the middle of a sentence because it happened to be
- the bottom of a page, and ask her what it meant. At that he
- took Celia’s poem and read it through word for word like a
- school-boy, looking up at her to see if he was right and should
- go on. She laughed immoderately, and as for Mr. Emerson, J.
- said his eyes left their wonted sockets and went to laugh far
- back in his brain.
-
- Putting down his book, Hunt launched off into his own life as
- a painter. His lonely position here without anyone to look up
- to in his art—his idea of art being entirely misunderstood,
- his determination _not_ to _paint_ cloth and cheeks, but to
- paint the glory of age and the light of truth. He became almost
- too excited to find words, but when he did grasp a phrase, it
- was such a fine one that it went a great way. His wife sat by
- making running comments, but when he said, “If any man who was
- talking could not be heard, he would naturally try to talk so
- that he could be heard,” we tried to urge him to stand firm
- and to assure him that his efforts were neither lost nor in
- vain. “If the books you wrote were left all dusty and untouched
- upon the shelves, don’t you think you would try to write so
- that people should want them? I am sure you would.” His wife
- tried to say he must stand in the way he knew was right—as did
- we all—but he seemed to think it too hard, too Sisyphus-like
- a labor. The portrait of little Paul is still unsold. After
- keeping the carriage waiting one hour and a half, they went—a
- most interesting pair.
-
-[Illustration: A CORNER OF THE CHARLES STREET LIBRARY]
-
- _Tuesday, April 23._—Shakespeare’s birthday. Emerson and his
- daughter passed the night with us and Edith Davidson, Ellen’s
- “daughter,” came to breakfast. We talked over again the
- pleasure of the night before. Emerson had never heard Hunt talk
- before and had seldom found Longfellow so expansive. Holmes
- met J. in the course of the day, and told him he had a real
- good time, though he did have a thumping headache—he was much
- pleased with Alice Longfellow.
-
-[Illustration: _From a note of Emerson’s to Mrs. Fields_]
-
- _Tuesday, May 21._—Call from Mr. Emerson, Mrs. E. and Ellen.
- They came in a body to thank me, which Mrs. Emerson did in
- a little set speech after her own fashion, at which we all
- laughed heartily—especially at the “profit” clause. Indeed we
- had a very merry time altogether. Mr. Emerson gave “Queenie”
- permission to look all about the room, “for indeed there was
- not such another in all Boston—no indeed [half soliloquizing],
- not such another.” Then he looked about and told them the wrong
- names of the painters, and would have been entirely satisfied
- if he had not referred to me, when I was obliged to tell the
- truth and so from that time he made me speaker. He said he
- should do his very best for the university class for women
- for next December to make up for having served them so badly
- this winter. He said I had _very gently_ reminded him of his
- entire forgetfulness to fulfil an engagement or half-engagement
- to come to speak to them this winter. “Queenie” told me she
- was one of the few persons who had read Miss Mitford’s poems,
- “Blanche” and all the rest, and liked them very much. So the
- various portraits of the old lady interested her much.
-
- They came down to Boston, Mrs. E. said, on purpose to make this
- call. I had just returned home from a long drive about town on
- business, so it was the best possible moment for me.
-
- Our first thought this morning (J’s. and mine) was, how could
- Mr. Emerson finish his course of “Conversations,” which had
- been so brilliant until the last, in so unsatisfactory a
- manner. His matter was for the most part old, and he finished
- with reading well-known hymns of Dr. Watts and Mrs. Barbauld. I
- fear we were all disappointed. Some of the lectures (especially
- the one on “Love”) have been so fine that we were bitterly
- disappointed.
-
-A later reference to Emerson shows him in Philadelphia, and through
-the eyes of a qualified observer there. The passage was written at
-Manchester-by-the-Sea, to which Mr. and Mrs. Fields had begun to pay
-summer visits even before 1872, and where they soon acquired that cottage
-of their own on “Thunderbolt Hill,” which belied its name in serving as
-the most peaceful of retreats for Mrs. Fields and the friends she was
-constantly summoning to her side through all the remainder of her life.
-
- _Tuesday, August 25, 1872._—Miss A. Whitney came Saturday and
- remained until Monday morning. Sunday evening we passed at
- Mrs. Towne’s. Mrs. Annis Wister[17] of Pennsylvania had just
- arrived, a dramatic creature, who tells and tells again at
- request, with as much amiability as talent, her wonderful story
- of Father Donne, the Irish priest, who performed the marriage
- ceremony for one of her servants. Mrs. Wister, in spite of a
- lisp, has a thoroughly clear enunciation. She never leaves a
- sentence unfinished nor suffers the imagination to complete any
- corner of her picture. She is exceedingly lively and witty,
- and Miss Whitney, whose mind is quite different and altogether
- introverted, busied over her artistic conceptions, could not
- help a feeling of envy. The gift of narration, so rare in
- this country, has been carefully cultivated by Mrs. Wister,
- and poor Miss Whitney could only wonder and admire. I could
- see her fine large eyes glow with pleasure and desire as she
- listened to her. Mrs. Wister told me an odd thing, which shows
- her as an individual. She asked me how the testimonial to Mr.
- Emerson was progressing, as her father was much interested and
- thought nothing he possessed too good to be given at once to
- Mr. Emerson, nor indeed worthy of his acceptance, and she would
- like to write him. I told her I believed the sum had reached
- $10,000, and had already been presented. This led her to say
- the friendship of her father for Mr. Emerson, and indeed their
- mutual friendship, as she then believed it to be, dated back
- to their youth, when Mr. Emerson was first writing his poems
- and delighting over the illustrations her father would make for
- them. As she grew up, she became dissatisfied at the relation
- between them. She thought Mr. Furness, her father, gave much
- more to Mr. Emerson in the way of friendship than Mr. Emerson
- ever appreciated. This went on until she became about eighteen
- years of age, when Mr. Emerson chanced to be visiting them in
- Pennsylvania. One day she was standing upon the stairs near the
- front door, and Mr. Emerson was ready to go out and waiting
- there for her father, who had withdrawn for a moment. Her heart
- was full, and suddenly she turned upon Mr. Emerson, and said,
- “Mr. Emerson, I think you cannot know what a treasure you have
- in this friendship of my father. He loves you dearly and I fear
- you cannot appreciate what it is to have the love of such a man
- as my father.” She says to this day she grows “pank,” as the
- Scotchman said, all over at such presumption, but she could not
- help it.
-
- I asked what Mr. Emerson replied. He looked surprised, she
- said, and cast his eyes down, and then said earnestly that he
- knew and felt deeply how unworthy he was to enjoy the riches of
- such a friendship.
-
- This incident presented Mrs. Wister as well as Mr. Emerson
- under a keen light. They could never understand each other.
-
-From October, 1872, until the following May, Emerson and his daughter
-Ellen were traveling abroad. On their return Mrs. Fields wrote in her
-journal:—
-
- _Thursday, May 27, 1873._—The Nortons came home with the
- Emersons day before yesterday. Emerson came to pass an hour
- with J. T. F. before going to Concord. His son Edward had come
- down to meet him and was full of excitement over the reception
- his father was to receive and of which he was altogether
- ignorant. He was overjoyed to be on the old ground again and
- comes back to value the old friends even more than ever. He
- must have been much pleased by the joy testified in Concord,
- but we have only the newspaper account of that. He has been
- fêted more than ever in England, and Ellen was rather worn out
- by the ovations; but her general health is much improved. The
- Nortons, who returned in the same steamer, tell me Miss Emerson
- was fêted for her own sake and was his rival! Her “American
- manners” became all the rage in that world of novelty. One
- night a gentleman sitting next her at dinner introduced the
- word “æsthetic.” She said she did not understand what he meant
- by that word!
-
- On the voyage Emerson was devoted to his daughter and full
- of fun in all his talk with her. He would tuck her up in
- blanket shawls and go up and down, hither and yon, to make
- her comfortable—then he would laugh at her for being such an
- exacting young lady and would be very ironical about the manner
- in which she would allow him to wait on her. “And yet,” he
- said, turning to the Nortons, “Ellen is the torch of religion
- at home.”
-
-Throughout the journals Mrs. Fields’s references to meetings of the
-Saturday Club, and the records of conversation reported by her husband
-after these lively gatherings, are frequent. In one brief entry Parkman,
-Lowell, and Emerson appear in a conjunction that could hardly have been
-happy at the moment, but the concluding words of the passage may well
-stand, for their appreciation of Emerson, at the end of these pages
-concerned chiefly with him.
-
- _August 26, 1874._— ... Parkman said to Lowell, and a more
- strange evidence of lapse of tact could hardly be discovered,
- “Lowell, what did you mean by ‘the land of broken promise’?”
- Emerson, catching at this last, said, “What is this about the
- land of broken promise?” clearly showing he had never read
- Lowell’s Ode upon the death of Agassiz—whereat Lowell answered
- not at all, but dropped his eyes and silence succeeded,
- although Parkman made some kind of futile attempt to struggle
- out of it. Emerson said, “We have met two great losses in our
- Club since you were last here—Agassiz and Sumner.” “Yes,” said
- Lowell, “but a greater than either was that of a man I could
- never make you believe in as I did—Hawthorne.” This ungracious
- speech silenced even Emerson, whose warm hospitality to the
- thought and speech of others is usually unending.
-
-[Illustration: _Facsimile of autograph inscription on a photograph of
-Rowse’s crayon portrait of Lowell given to Fields_]
-
-In “Authors and Friends” Mrs. Fields concerned herself with Longfellow
-and Whittier at even greater length than with Holmes and Emerson. The
-Whittier paper, besides, was printed as a small separate volume; and
-in Samuel T. Pickard’s “Life of Whittier,” as in Samuel Longfellow’s
-biography of his brother, the letters from Whittier, as from Longfellow,
-to Mrs. Fields, and to her husband, bear witness to valued intimacies.
-Neither to Whittier nor to Longfellow, therefore, does it seem desirable
-to devote a special section of these papers; nor yet to Lowell, who never
-became the subject of published reminiscences by Mrs. Fields, perhaps
-for the very reason that he figures somewhat less frequently than the
-others in her journal. Yet there are many allusions to him, and in
-addition to the letters to Fields which Norton selected for his “Letters
-of James Russell Lowell,” and Scudder for his biography of Lowell, a
-surprising number of unprinted, characteristic communications, both to
-Fields and to his wife, testify to their friendship. The remainder of
-this chapter cannot be more profitably employed than by drawing from
-Mrs. Fields’s journal passages relating to these and other local guests
-of the Charles Street house, and supplementing the diary especially with
-a few of Lowell’s sprightly letters to his successor in the editorship
-of the “Atlantic Monthly.” It may be remarked, as fairly indicative of
-the relations between Lowell and the Fieldses through many years, that
-when they visited England in 1869 their traveling companion was Lowell’s
-daughter Mabel.
-
-[Illustration: JAMES RUSSELL LOWELL
-
-_From the crayon portrait by Rowse in the Harvard College Library_]
-
-Here, to begin with, is a note written to accompany one of Lowell’s
-most familiar poems, “After the Burial,” when he sent the manuscript to
-the editor of the “Atlantic.” Lowell’s practice of shunning capitals at
-the beginning of his letters, except for the first personal pronoun, is
-observed in the quotations that follow:—
-
- ELMWOOD, _8th March, 1868_
-
- MY DEAR FIELDS:—
-
- when I am in a financial crisis, which is on an average once
- in six weeks, I look first to my portfolio and then to you.
- The verses I send you are most of them more than of age, but
- Professors don’t write poems, and I even begin to doubt if
- poets do—always. But I suppose you will pay me for my name as
- you do others, and so I send the verses hoping you may also
- find something in _them_ that is worth praise if not coin.
- Consolation and commonplace are twin sisters and I doubt not
- one sat at each ear of Eve after Cain’s misunderstanding with
- his brother. In some folks they cause resentment, and this
- little burst relieved mine under some desperate solacings after
- the death of our first child, twenty-one years ago. I trust
- there is nothing too immediately personal to myself in the poem
- to make the publishing of it a breach of that confidence which
- a man should keep sacred with himself.
-
- With kind regards to Mrs. Fields, I remain always yours,
-
- J. R. LOWELL
-
-Another typical letter, dated “Elmwood, 12th July, 1868, ¼ to 9 AM wind
-W. by N. Therm 88°,” begins:—
-
- MY DEAR FIELDS:—
-
- as I swelter here, it is some consolation for me that you are
- roasting in that Yankee-baker which we call the Wᵗᵉ Mᵗˢ. That
- repercussion of the sun’s heat from so many angles at once
- (the focus being the tourist) always struck me as one of the
- sublimest examples of the unvarying operation of natural laws.
- I wish you and Mrs. Fields might be made exceptions, but it can
- hardly be hoped.
-
-Before the end of the month Fields had escaped the perils of New
-Hampshire heat, and paid a visit to Elmwood, thus chronicled by Mrs.
-Fields:—
-
- _July 25, 1868._—J. went out to see Lowell last night. As he
- passed Longfellow’s door, “Trap,” the dog, was half-asleep
- apparently on the lawn, but hearing a foot-step he leaped up
- and, seeing who it was, became overjoyed, leaped upon him and
- covered his hands with caresses. He stayed some time playing
- with him. Lowell was alone in his library, looking into an
- empty fire-place and smoking a pipe. He has been in Newport
- for a week, but was delighted to return to find his “own
- sponge hanging on its nail” and to his books. He had become
- quite morbid because, while J. was away, a smaller sum than
- usual was sent him for his last poem. He thought it a delicate
- way of saying they wished to drop him. He was annoyed at the
- thought of having left out of his article on Dryden one of the
- finest points, he thought, that was making Dryden to appear the
- “Rubens” of literature, which he appears to him to be.
-
- Lowell is a man deeply pervaded with fine discontents. I do
- not believe the most favorable circumstances would improve
- him. Success, of which he has a very small share considering
- his deserts (for his books have a narrow circulation), would
- make him gayer and happier; whether so wise a man, I cannot but
- doubt.
-
- He wears a chivalric, tender manner to his wife.
-
-In the following autumn, Bayard Taylor and his wife were paying a visit
-in Charles Street, and Lowell appears in Mrs. Fields’s journal as one of
-the friends summoned in their honor.
-
- _Thursday morning, November 19, 1868._—Mr. Parton came to
- breakfast and Dr. Holmes came in before we had quite done. O.
- W. H. was delighted to see Mr. P., because of his papers on
- “Smoking and Drinking.” He believes smoking paralyzes the will.
- Taylor, on the contrary, feels himself better for smoking; it
- subdues his physical energy so he can write; otherwise he is
- nervous to be up and away and his mind will not work.
-
- At dinner we had Lowell, Parton, Mr. and Mrs. Taylor, Mr.
- and Mrs. Scott-Siddons and, later, Aldrich. Lowell talked
- most interestingly, head and shoulders beyond everybody else.
- The Siddonses left early, the gentlemen all smitten by her
- beauty and loveliness. A kind of childish grace pervaded her
- and she was beautiful as a picture. I could not wonder at
- their delight. Lowell’s talk after their departure was of
- literature, of course. He has been reading Calderon for the
- last six months, in the original. He finds him inexhaustible
- almost. Speaking of novels, he said Fielding was the master,
- although he considers there are but two perfect creations of
- individual character in all literature; these are Falstaff and
- Don Quixote; all the rest fell infinitely below—are imperfect
- and unworthy to stand by their side. Tom Jones he thought might
- come in, in the second rank, with many others, but far below.
- He said he could not tell his boys at Cambridge to read Tom
- Jones, for it might do them harm; but Fielding painted his own
- experience and the result was unrivalled. Thackeray and the
- rest were pleasant reading, very pleasant, and yet how could
- he tell his class that he read Tom Jones once a year![18] He
- scouted the idea of Pickwick or anybody else approaching his
- two great characters. They stood alone for all time. Rip Van
- Winkle was suggested, but he said in the first place that was
- not original. Few persons knew the story perhaps in the old
- Latin (he gave the name, but unhappily I have forgotten it) but
- it was only a remade dish after all.
-
- _Friday._—Bayard Taylor and his wife left for New York. Mr.
- Parton dined out and we had a quiet evening at home and went
- to bed early. (Parton thinks it would be possible to make the
- “Atlantic Monthly” far more popular. He suggests a writer named
- Mark Twain be engaged, and more articles connected with life
- than with literature.)
-
-It is easy to believe that Lowell’s talk must have sounded much like his
-letters, which so often sound like talk. Witness the following sentences
-from a letter of December 21, 1868, in reply, apparently, to an appeal
-for a new essay for the “Atlantic”:—
-
- Well, well, I am always astonished at the good nature of folks,
- and how much boring they will stand from authors. As I told
- Howells once, the day will come when a wiser generation will
- drive all its literary men into a corner and make a _battue_ of
- the whole lot. However, “after me, the deluge,” as Nero said,
- and I suppose they’ll stand another essay or two yet, if I can
- divine, or rather if I have absorbed enough of the general
- feeling about something to put a point on it.
-
- It’s a mercy I’m not conceited! I should like to be, and try
- to be, and have fizzes of it now and then, but they soon go
- out and leave a _fogo_ behind them I don’t like. But if I only
- were for a continuance I should be as grand a bore as ever
- lived—as grand as Wordsworth, by Jove! I would come into town
- once a week to read you over one of my old poems (selecting
- the longest, of course), and point out its beauties to you.
- You would flee to _Tierra del Fuego_ (ominous name!) to escape
- me. You would give up publishing. You would write an epic and
- read a book just to _me_ every time I came. But no, it is too
- bright a dream. Let me [be] satisfied with my class, who have
- to hear me once a week, and with just enough conceit to read
- my lectures as if I had not stolen ’em, as I am apt to do now.
- Look out for an essay that shall [make] Montaigne and Bacon
- cross as the devil—when they come to read it! It will come ere
- you think.
-
- Yours ever,
-
- FABIUS C. LOWELL
-
-A few weeks later Lowell was writing again to Fields, on January 12,
-1869, about a fiftieth birthday party at Elmwood:—
-
- I am going to celebrate my golden wedding with Life, on the
- 22nd of next month, by a dinner or a supper or something of the
- kind, and I want you to _jine_. I shall get together a dozen or
- so of old friends, and it will be a great satisfaction for you
- and me to see how _much grayer_ the rest of ’em are than we. I
- shall fit my invitations to this end, and the bald and hoary
- will have the chance of the lame, the halt, and the blind in
- the parable. If it should be a dinner, it won’t matter, but if
- a supper, be sure and forget your night-key and then you won’t
- have any anxiety, nor Mrs. Fields either. Of course, I shall
- have an account of the affair in the papers with a list of the
- gifts (especially in money) and the names of all who _donate_.
- You will understand by what I have said that it is to be one
- of those delightful things they call a “surprise party,” and I
- expect to live on it for a year—one friend for every month.
-
-A week later, in the course of a letter accepting the invitation of Mr.
-and Mrs. Fields for Lowell’s daughter to accompany them to Europe, he
-wrote: “Do you see that —— is to commence his autobiography in ‘Putnam’s
-Magazine’? At least, I take it for granted from the title—The Ass in Life
-and Literature? If sincerely done, it will be interesting.”
-
-For all the transcendentalism of the circle to which Mrs. Fields bore so
-intimate a relation, there emanated from Lowell and others an atmosphere
-of sincerity which helped to preserve the equilibrium of the more easily
-swayed. Mrs. Fields herself was not immune to the appeal of some of the
-“isms” of the time and place, but an entry in her journal for January 18,
-1870, shows her in no great peril of being swept away by them:—
-
- Attended yesterday a meeting of what is called the Radical
- Club. Mr. Channing spoke, Mr. Higginson, Wendell Phillips,
- Mrs. Howe, Mrs. Lucy Stone, Mr. Bartol, Wasson, J. F. Clarke,
- Edna Cheney. Mr. Whittier was present and a room full of
- “come-outers.” Mr. Channing and Mr. Phillips were reverent,
- though I think Mr. Phillips more definite, and perhaps
- consequently more conservative, in what he said. Certainly Mr.
- Phillips’s speech was highly satisfactory. On the whole there
- was much vague talk and restless expression of self without any
- high end being furthered. I thought much of Mr. Higginson’s
- talk and Mr. Wasson’s irreverent answer were untrue. Perhaps I
- am wrong in saying no good end is attained by such a meeting.
- Perhaps a closer understanding of what we do believe is the
- result. But there is much unpleasant in the unnatural and
- excited view of the inside ring.[19]
-
-There was, moreover, a constant corrective at hand in the persons of the
-local wits, among whom Longfellow’s brother-in-law, Thomas Gold (“Tom”)
-Appleton, was of the most clear-sighted. His definition of Nahant as
-“cold roast Boston,” and his prescription for tempering the gales on a
-particularly windy Boston corner by tethering a shorn lamb there, have
-secured him something more than a local survival. He frequently left his
-mark on the pages of Mrs. Fields’s diary—once venturing seriously into
-prophecy on the spiritual future of Boston, in terms which will seem, at
-least, _in partibus infidelium_, to have received a certain confirmation
-at the hands of time. In the diary the following entry is found:—
-
- _Sunday, November 6, 1870._—Appleton (Tom, as the world calls
- him) came in soon after breakfast Sunday morning. He talked
- very wisely and brilliantly upon Art, its value and purpose to
- the state, the necessity for the Museum. He said our people
- were far more literary than artistic. The sensuous side of
- their nature was undeveloped. The richness of color, the glory
- of form, was less to them than something which could set the
- sharp edge of their intellect in motion. “Besides, what is
- Boston going to do,” he said, “when these fellows die who give
- it its honor now, Longfellow, Holmes, and the rest? They can’t
- live forever, and with them its glory will depart without it
- is sustained by a foundation for art in other directions.
- Harvard University will do something to keep it up, but not
- much, and unless a distinct effort be made now, Boston will
- lose its place and go behind.” He became much excited by the
- lack of appreciation for William Story in Boston, and the
- abuse of the Everett statue, which he considers good in its
- way and as marking the highest point in Everett’s oratorical
- fame, that is, when he lifted his hand to indicate the stars in
- his address at Albany, and set his fame some points nearer the
- luminaries which inspired him, by his fine eloquence.
-
- He said a merchant told him one day that he didn’t like Story’s
- portrait statues, but his ideal work he was delighted with.
- “You lie!” I said to him. “The beautiful Shepherd-Boy which I
- helped to buy and bring to Boston you know nothing of—you can’t
- tell me now in which corner of the Public Library it is hidden
- away. I tell you, you lie!”
-
- He spoke of the Saturday Club, and said that, although he
- sometimes smiled at Holmes’s enthusiasm over it, he believed
- in the main he was quite right, and it would be remembered in
- future as Johnson’s Club has been, and recorded and talked of
- in the same way.
-
- Unfortunately I don’t see their Boswell. I wish I could believe
- there was a single chiel amang them takin’ notes.[20]
-
-On December 14, 1870, the diary recorded a dinner at which Longfellow,
-Osgood, Aldrich, Holmes, Dana, Howells, Lowell, and Bayard Taylor were
-the guests. It celebrated the completion of Taylor’s translation of
-“Faust.” Of the talk of Lowell and Longfellow, Mrs. Fields wrote:—
-
- Before dinner I found opportunity for a short talk with Lowell
- upon literature. He thinks the chief value of Bret Harte is
- his local color and it would be a fatal mistake for him to
- come East, in spite of Taylor’s representation of the aridity
- of intellectual life now in California. Taylor finds the same
- reason for leaving his native place. He regrets his large
- house, and frankly says he is tired of living there, tired of
- living alone, there being really no one in the vicinity with
- whom he can associate as on equal grounds. There is no culture,
- not even a love for it, in the neighborhood.
-
- But I have not said half enough of Longfellow. He scintillated
- all the evening, was filled with the spirit of the time and the
- scene, sweetly reprimanded Taylor for not having time to give
- him a visit also, darted his _jeux d’esprit_ rapidly right and
- left, often setting the table in a roar, a most unusual thing
- with him. Holmes at the other end was talking about the natural
- philosophers who “invented facts.” Lowell took exception, said
- it was an impossible juxtaposition of ideas and words. Holmes
- defended himself by quoting (I think the name was Carius;
- whoever it was, Lowell said at once and rather warningly, he is
- a very distinguished name) a series of created facts by which
- he said a woman was not articulated or not as a man is (perhaps
- I have not his exact ideas); whereat Longfellow at once held up
- the _inarticulate_ woman to the amusement of the table. Then
- they began to talk of the singular persons this world contains,
- “quite as strange as Dickens,” as they always say; and Taylor,
- who introduced the subject, proceeded to relate an incident
- which happened to him in a cheap coffee house in New York.
- It was near a railway station, so he dropped in, finding it
- convenient so to do, at an hour not usually popular with the
- frequenters of such establishments. It was empty save for an
- extraordinary figure with long arms, short legs and misshapen
- body, who, hearing a glass of ale ordered, came forward and
- said if he pleased he would like to have _his_ ale at the same
- table for the sake of company. There was nothing to do but
- to comply, which Taylor of course did, whereupon the strange
- creature, never asking who Taylor was, went on to relate that
- _he_ was the great man-monkey of the world who could hang from
- a tree and eat nuts and make the true noise in the throat
- better than any other; he had no competitor except one of the
- Ravel brothers, but he (Ravel) was not the real thing; he
- himself alone could make the noise perfectly....
-
- They all drank the exquisite Ehrbacher Rhine wine from tall
- green German glasses of antique form, which delighted them
- greatly. Jamie was much entertained by Holmes’s finding them
- “good conversational aperient, but ugly. I should always have
- them on the table, but they are not handsome.” Longfellow was
- delighted with my Venetian lace bodice; it seemed to have a
- flavor of Venice about it in his eyes. It was a real pleasure
- to me to see his appreciation of a thing Jamie and I really
- enjoy so much.
-
- I have not reported all, by any means, but time fails me now.
- A thought of Dickens was continually present, as it must be
- forever at a company dinner-table. How many beautiful feasts
- have I enjoyed by his side! There is none like him, none.
-
- Taylor wrote a friendly German inscription in his book and
- presented me after dinner.
-
- There were amusing traits of Elizabeth Peabody given.
- Longfellow remembered that the first time he met her was in
- a carriage. She was taken up in the dark. Hearing his name
- mentioned, she leaned forward and said, “Mr. Longfellow, can
- you tell me which is the best Chinese Grammar?”
-
-A midsummer entry of the same year suggests the part that an editor’s
-wife may play in the successful conduct of a magazine, if only through
-sharing the enthusiasm that attends the first reading of a manuscript of
-distinguished merit.
-
- _Saturday, July 16, 1870._—A perfect summer day. Jamie did not
- go to town, but with a bag full of letters and MSS. concluded
- to remain here. He fell first upon a MS. by Henry James,
- Jr., a short story called “Compagnons de Voyage,” and after
- tasting of it in our room and finding the quality good (though
- the handwriting was execrable), I invited my dear boy to a
- favorite nook in the pasture where we could hear the sea and
- catch a distant gleam of its blue face while we were still in
- shadow and fanned by oak leaves. It was one of those delicious
- seasons which summer can bring to the dullest heart, I believe
- and hope. We lay down with our feet plunged into the cool
- delicious grass, while I read the pleasant tale of Italy to the
- close. I do not know why success in work should affect us so
- powerfully, but I could have wept as I finished reading, not
- from the sweet low pathos of the tale, which was not tearful,
- but from the knowledge of the writer’s success. It is so
- difficult to do anything well in this mysterious world.
-
-On the very next day Lowell wrote Fields a letter which must have been
-read with delight by such friends of Dickens as the Fieldses. The
-decorated sonnet which filled its third sheet is reproduced herewith in
-facsimile: the plainness of Lowell’s script renders type superfluous.
-The mere fact that the death of Dickens could have called forth clerical
-expressions provoking Lowell to such scorn is in itself a measure of the
-distance we have travelled since 1870. The verses are not included in
-Lowell’s “Poetical Works,” nor are they listed in the “Bibliography of
-James Russell Lowell,” compiled by George Willis Cooke. With two slight
-changes they may be found, however, over Lowell’s signature, in “Every
-Saturday,” for August 6, 1870.
-
-[Illustration: _Facsimile of Lowell’s “Bulldog and Terrier” sonnet_]
-
- ELMWOOD, _17th July, 1870_
-
- MY DEAR FIELDS:—
-
- I can stand it no longer! If Dickens is to be banned, the rest
- of us might as well fling up our hands. This hot weather, too,
- gives a foretaste that raises well-founded apprehension. It
- is a good primary school for the Institution of which the
- Rev’ds Fulton and Dunn seem to be ushers. Instead of going to
- Church today, where I might have heard something not wholly to
- my advantage, as the advertisements for _lost_ people say, I
- have written a sermon. It is not a proper sonnet, but a cross
- between that and epigram—a kind of bull-terrier, in short, with
- the size of the one and the prick-ears and docked tail of the
- other, nor without his special talent for rats. Is there any
- grip in his jaw or no? He is good-natured and scarce shows his
- teeth.
-
- The thing is an improvisation and the weather awfully hot!
-
- Sweltered your servant sits and sweats and swears: (for
- alliteration only) but if you would like it for the “Atlantic,”
- why here it is on the next leaf. Or, if too late, why not
- “Every Saturday”? I could not even think of it sooner, for I
- have been wrestling with a bad head and an article on Chaucer,
- and I fear they have thrown me. I want rest, and a bath of
- poetry, but where may the wicked hope for either? My sonnet
- (if Leigh Hunt would let me call it so) hit me like a stray
- shot from nowhere that I could divine, and five minutes saw it
- finished. So why may it not be good? It came, anyhow, as a poem
- comes—though it isn’t just that. But my dog isn’t bad? He is
- from the life at any rate.
-
- I shall make use of my first leisure to get into Boston.
- But I have got bedevilled with the text of Chaucer and am
- working on it with my usual phrenzy—thirteen hours, for
- example, yesterday, collating texts and writing into margins.
- I comfort myself that my Chaucer will bring a handsome price
- at my _vandoo_! I shall be easier in my coffin if it run up
- handsomely for Fanny and Mabel.
-
- Do you want an essay for your “Almanac” if one should come,
- which is doubtful? I need one or two more to make a little
- volume, and I need a little volume for nameless reasons. O, if
- I could sell my land! I would transmute that gold into poetry.
- Or if only poems would come when you whistle for ’em!
-
- Give my kindest regards to Mrs Fields.
-
- Yours always,
-
- J. R. L.
-
- From my study, this first day for three weeks without a drowsy
- pain in my knowledge box, I really feel a little lively, and
- wonder at myself. But don’t be alarmed—it won’t last, any more
- than money does, or principle in a politician, or hair, or
- popular favor—or paper.
-
-Lowell and Longfellow continue to make their appearances in Mrs. Fields’s
-diary.
-
- _December 7, 1871._—Last Sunday Charlotte Cushman dined here.
- Our guests asked to meet her were Mr. and Mrs. Lowell and
- Mr. Longfellow; Miss Stebbins and Miss Chapman, her guests,
- also came. We had a lovely social time, Lowell making himself
- especially interesting, as he always does when he can once work
- himself up to the pitch of going out at all. He talked a while
- with me about poetry and his own topics after dinner. He said
- he was one of the few people who believed in absolute truth;
- that he always looked for certain qualities in writers, which
- if he could not discover, they no longer interested him and
- he did not care to read them. He discovered, for instance, in
- the writers who had survived the centuries the same kindred
- points, those points he studied until he discovered what the
- adamant was and where it was founded; then he would look into
- the writers of our own age to see if he could find the same
- stuff; there was little enough of it unfortunately. He does
- not like Reynolds’s portrait of Johnson, thought it untrue,
- far too handsome, yet highly characteristic in the management
- of the hands, which portray the man as he was when talking
- better probably than anything ever did. Mrs. Lowell appeared to
- enjoy herself. J. says L. is always more himself if Mrs. L. is
- happy and talkative. They are thinking of Europe. Mabel is to
- be married in April, and afterward they probably go at once to
- Europe.
-
- A small party of friends assembled in the evening. Longfellow
- was the beloved and observed and worshipped among all.
-
-[Illustration: HENRY WADSWORTH LONGFELLOW
-
-_From a photograph taken in middle life_]
-
- _April 11, 1872._—Last night Jamie dined with Longfellow. John
- Field of Pennsylvania and Lowell were the two other guests.
- J. was there twenty minutes before the rest arrived, and
- Longfellow gave him an account of the wedding of a school-mate
- of mine, —— ——, an excellent generous-hearted, generously built
- woman, with a little limping old clergyman who has already had
- three wives and whose first name is ——. Longfellow said, in
- memory of what had gone before, the organist, as if driven
- by some evil spirit, played “Auld Lang Syne,” as the wedding
- procession came in, consisting of the bride and her brother,
- two very well-made large persons and the elderly bridegroom
- limping on behind all alone. The organist suddenly stopped at
- this point, breaking off with a queer little quirk and shiver
- as if he only then discovered what he was doing. Indeed the
- whole wedding appeared to have points to affect the risibles
- of the poet. He could hardly speak of it without laughter.
- He said, moreover, that it was, he thought, disgusting and
- outrageous for old men to get married.
-
- _Tuesday, September 23, 1872._—Longfellow came to town to see
- Jamie, in one of his loveliest moods. The day was so warm and
- fine, such a day of dreams, that he proposed to him every kind
- of excursion. “Come,” he said, “let us go to the tea stores
- and smell the tea; the warm atmosphere will bring out all the
- odors and we can get samples!” And again, “Come, let us go to
- the wharves and see the vessels just in from Italy or Spain.
- It will be a lovely sight in this soft sky, and we can hear
- the men speak in their native tongues.” Unhappily all these
- seductions were in vain, for Jamie was busy and was to lecture
- in Grantville in the evening. L. said: “At half-past eight I
- shall think of you doing thus and thus” (sawing the air with
- his arms). L. continued: “You know I have very strange people
- come to me—a man came a day or two ago by the name of Hyers,
- who has just published a book describing his own career. He
- believes that he is fed by the Lord! ‘How do you mean?’ asked
- I, with the knowledge that we were all fed in the same way.
- ‘Why,’ said H., ‘He leaves _pies and peanuts on the sidewalks
- for me_.’” Longfellow could hardly contain himself—but “after
- all,” he said, “that is very like Greene: when Greene comes to
- me, he always takes his money to come and go, just like my own
- sons and without so much as a thank you. But I like to have
- Greene come because he enjoys it so much and it is so strange.
- He amuses me. Then Appleton too, with his odd fancies, it would
- be hard to find a stranger man than he. He amused me immensely
- the other day by fancying an Indian, ‘Great Fire,’ or ‘Hole in
- the Wall,’ or some such fellow, coming to Boston for the first
- time. Passing a perruquier’s, he sees the window filled with
- masses of false hair; taking them to be scalps and the window
- to be an exhibition of these tokens of prowess, he rushes in,
- embraces the little perruquier behind the counter, treats him
- like a brother, and almost frightens the small hairdresser out
- of his senses!!”
-
- L. likes Joaquin [Miller] much. Of course, he said, there
- are some things about him not altogether agreeable, such as
- flinging a quid of tobacco out of his mouth under the table;
- “but I don’t mind those things; perhaps,” he added, “perhaps I
- might have done the same as a youth of 20!!!”
-
- _Thursday, June 12, 1873._—Dined last night with the Aldriches
- and Mr. Bugbee at Mr. Lowell’s beautiful old Elmwood.[21] It
- was a perfect night, cool, fresh, moon-lighted, after a muggy
- day of heat. After dinner I went into the fine old study with
- Aldrich, where he showed me two or three little poems he has
- lately written. He was all ready to talk on literary topics
- and much in earnest about his own satisfaction over “Miss
- Mehitable’s Son” (which is indeed a very good story), and was
- full of disgust over the “Nation’s” cool dismissal of it.
- It was too bad; but that Dennet of the “Nation” is beneath
- contempt because of the slights he throws upon good literary
- work. Aldrich says he found “Asphodel” all worn to pieces, read
- and reread in the upstairs study. He finds Mr. Lowell’s library
- in curious disorder with respect to modern books. He is an easy
- lender and an easy borrower. The result is, everything is at
- loose ends. Only two volumes of Hawthorne can be found, for
- instance....
-
- Such wonderful colors overspread our bay this evening, the
- wide heavens, and all that lay between, it seemed an unreal
- and magic glory, and I recall dimly Hawthorne’s disgust when
- he endeavored to describe a landscape. The Lord, he says,
- expressed himself in this glory; how shall we therefore
- interpret into language when he himself has taken this form of
- speech as the only adequate expression to convey his meaning to
- us? Who does not feel this in looking at the glories of Nature
- in this perfect season?
-
-And here is a final glimpse of Longfellow, at Manchester-by-the-Sea,
-shortly after Don Pedro of Brazil had visited him in Cambridge:—
-
- _Thursday, July 6, 1876._—A fine rushing wind—no rain, but a
- wind that seemed to tear everything up by the roots. I dared
- not venture out in the morning. To our surprise and delight Mr.
- Longfellow came to dine. He was pleased to find Anna here, and
- fell to talking of Heidelberg in German with her and quoting
- the poets most delightfully. We sat in the front hall and
- rejoiced over his presence as he talked, for he was in a fine
- talking mood. He told us of the Emperor’s visit and of his
- soldierly though most simple bearing; how he came to call upon
- him after his dinner, and when, as he rose to go, Longfellow
- said, “Your Majesty, I thank you for the honor you have done
- me.” He said, “Ah! no, Longfellow, none of your nonsense, let
- us be friends together. I hope you will write to me. I will
- write you first and you must promise to answer.” As they walked
- down the garden path together, Longfellow raised his hat and
- stepped one side as he was about to get into his carriage. “No,
- no,” he said laughingly, “there you are at it again.” In short,
- he has left a pleasant memory behind.
-
- Longfellow told us his maids broke everything he possessed; at
- last they had broken a very beautiful Japanese vase or bowl
- which Charley brought home—so he had made a Latin epitaph for
- the maid. Unhappily I recall only the last line:—
-
- _Nihil tetigit quod non fregit._
-
- He described Blumenbach very amusingly, whose lectures on
- Natural History he attended as a youth in Heidelberg. He
- descended from his desk one day and came and rested his hand on
- the rail just before which L. was seated. He had been speaking
- of Platonic love. “Und die Platonische Liebe ist nach Amerika
- gegangen,” he said, looking at Longfellow. The whole student
- audience roared and applauded.
-
- He was in the loveliest spirits and manners. His friendly
- ways to my three friendless girls were not only such as to
- excite them profoundly, but there was sincere feeling in his
- invitation to them to call upon him and in his questions in
- their behalf.
-
- The wind subsided as we sat together; the two young Bigelows
- sang “Maid of Athens” and one or two other songs, and then
- he departed. How sorry we were as we watched his retreating
- figure, as he and dear J. wound down the hill in the little
- phaeton.
-
-Mrs. Fields’s gallery of friends would be incomplete without a single
-sketch of Whittier’s familiar outline. Out of many which the diaries
-contain, one may best be taken, for it shows him in company with that
-other friend, Celia Thaxter, whom also Mrs. Fields counted among the
-few to whose memory she devoted special chapters in her “Authors and
-Friends”; and it brings the three together at Mrs. Thaxter’s native Isles
-of Shoals, so long a mecca of the “like-minded.”
-
-[Illustration: _From a note of “Dear Whittier” to Mrs. Fields_]
-
- _July 12, 1873._—I shall not soon forget our talk one afternoon
- in the parlor at “The Shoals.” Whittier, as if inspired by
- that spirit residing in us which is the very ground-work of
- the Quaker belief, began to speak of Emerson’s faith and of
- the pain it gave him to see the name of Jesus placed in his
- writings as but one among many. When he discoursed with Emerson
- of these things, he could have no satisfaction. Celia, on the
- other hand, said she did not understand these things; she never
- prayed. “I am sure thee does without knowing it,” said W.;
- “else what do thy poems mean? Thee has not set prayer perhaps,
- but some kind of a prayer thee must have. No human being can
- exist without it. But what troubles me also in Emerson is that
- I can find no real faith in immortality.” Here I took up the
- question. I had heard Mr. Emerson at Thoreau’s grave, afterward
- speaking expressly on immortality, and in both discourses I
- felt deeply his faith in our future progress and enduring
- life. Whittier was inclined to think me mistaken. I think
- too that his use of Jesus’ name is to prevent the worship
- of him instead of the One God. Whittier asked Celia to read
- a discourse of Emerson’s, which she did aloud; and again he
- spoke of the beauty of childlike worship, the necessity for it
- in our natures, and quoted some lovely hymns. His whole heart
- was alive and poured out toward us as if he longed tenderly
- like the prophet of old to breathe a new life into us. I could
- seem to see that he reproached himself that so many days had
- passed without his trying to speak more seriously. He was not
- perfectly well after this—a headache overtook him before our
- talk was over and did not leave him until he found himself in
- Amesbury again. I trust it did so there....
-
- Whittier said one day, when we were talking of the “Life of
- Charlotte Brontë” by Mrs. Gaskell, and I was saying how sad it
- was she should have made the old man, her father, suffer unto
- death, as she did, by telling the tale of his bad son’s life,
- and “still worse,” I said, “she came out in the Athenæum and
- declared that her story was false, when she knew it was true,
- hoping to comfort the old man,”—“I don’t know,” said Whittier;
- “I am inclined to think that was the best part of it, if her
- lie would have done the old man any good!”
-
- After we had our long afternoon session of talk over Emerson
- and future existence and the unknowable, Celia stood up and
- stretched herself and said, “How good it has been with the
- little song-sparrow putting in his oar above it all!”
-
- And what of Mrs. Fields herself, a woman of nearly forty
- when this last passage was written? For the most part the
- diary reveals her but indirectly. Yet in the midst of all her
- pictures of her friends, a fragment of self-portraiture is
- occasionally found; and to one of them the reader of these
- pages is entitled.
-
-[Illustration: _Proposed Dedication of Whittier’s “Among the Hills” to
-Mrs. Fields. In a letter to Mrs. Fields, Whittier wrote: “I would like
-thy judgment about it. Would this do?” In altered form it appears in the
-book._]
-
- _December 18, 1873._—Have been looking over “Wilhelm Meister”!
- I struck upon that marvellous passage, “I reverence the
- individual who understands distinctly what he wishes; who
- unweariedly advances; who knows the means conducive to his
- object, and can seize and use them. How far his object may be
- great or little is the next consideration with me”; and much
- more quite as good to the same end. It prompts me to say what I
- wish to do in life.
-
- Aristotle writes: “Virtue is concerned with action, art with
- production.” The problem of life is how to harmonize the
- two—either career must become _prominent_ according to the
- nature of the individual. I discern in myself: 1st, the desire
- to serve others unselfishly according to the example of our
- dear Lord; 2nd, the desire to cultivate my powers in order
- to achieve the highest life possible to me as an individual
- existence by stimulating thought to its finest issues through
- reflection, observation, and by profound and ceaseless study of
- the written thoughts of the wisest in every age and every clime.
-
- To fulfil these aims we must be able to answer the simple
- question promptly to ourselves: “What then shall I do tomorrow
- and today?” Then, the decision being made, the thing alone must
- have all the earnestness put into it of a creature who knows
- that the next moment he may be called to his account.
-
- As a woman and a wife my first duty lies at home; to make that
- beautiful,—to stimulate the lives of others by exchange of
- ideas, and the repose of domestic life; to educate children and
- servants.
-
- 2nd, To be conversant with the very poor; to visit their homes;
- to be keenly alive to their sufferings; never allowing the
- thought of their necessities to sleep in our hearts.
-
- 3rd, By day and night, morning and evening, in all times and
- seasons when strength is left to us, to study, study, study.
-
- Because I have put this last, it does not stand last in
- importance; but to put it first and write out the plan for
- study which my mind naturally selects would be to ignore that
- example of perfect life in which I humbly believe, and to
- return to the lives of the ancients, so fine in their results
- to the few, so costly to the many. But in the removed periods
- of existence, when solitude may be our blessed portion, what a
- joy to fly to communion with the sages and live and love with
- them!
-
- I have written this out for the pleasure of seeing if “I
- distinctly understand what I wish.” It is a wide plan, too
- wide, I fear, for much performance, but therefore perhaps more
- conducive to a constant faith.
-
-
-
-
-V
-
-WITH DICKENS IN AMERICA[22]
-
-
-When Mrs. Fields wrote the “Personal Recollections” of Oliver Wendell
-Holmes which appear in her “Authors and Friends,” she quoted, with a few
-changes prompted by modesty, this passage from a letter received from him
-at Christmas, 1881: “Except a few of my immediate family connections, no
-friends have seen me so often as a guest as did you and your husband.
-Under your roof I have met more visitors to be remembered than under any
-other. But for your hospitality I should never have had the privilege
-of personal acquaintance with famous writers and artists whom I can now
-recall as I saw them, talked with them, heard them in that pleasant
-library, that most lively and agreeable dining-room. How could it be
-otherwise with such guests as he entertained with his own unflagging
-vivacity and his admirable social gifts?”
-
-One of the visitors thus encountered by Dr. Holmes was Charles Dickens.
-Here was a guest after the host’s own heart—and the hostess’s. The host
-stood alone among publishers as a friend of the authors with whom it was
-his business to deal. Out of them all there was none with whom he came to
-stand on terms of closer sympathy and friendship than with Dickens. They
-had first met when Dickens came to America in 1842, and Fields was by no
-means the conspicuous figure he was to become. When he visited Europe in
-1859-60, with his young wife, whose personality was to contribute its own
-beauty and charm to the hospitality of 148 Charles Street for many years
-to come, they dined with Dickens in London, visited him at Gad’s Hill,
-and had much discussion of a plan, which Fields had been urging upon
-him in correspondence, for Dickens to come to America for a course of
-readings. As early as in one of the letters of this time, Dickens wrote
-to Fields: “Here I forever renounce ‘Mr.’ as having anything whatever to
-do with our communication, and as being a mere preposterous interloper.”
-From such beginnings grew the intimacy which caused Dickens, when he drew
-up the humorous terms of a walking-match between Dolby, his manager,
-and Osgood, Fields’s partner, while the Boston readings of 1868 were in
-progress, to define Fields as “Massachusetts Jemmy” and himself as the
-“Gad’s Hill Gasper” by virtue of his “surprising performances (without
-the least variation) on that true national instrument, the American
-catarrh.”
-
-The visits of Dickens to America, first in 1842, then in the winter of
-1867-68, have been the subject of abundant chronicle. For the first
-of them there is the direct record of his “American Notes,” besides
-those indirect reflections in “Martin Chuzzlewit,” which wrought an
-effect described by Carlyle in the characteristic saying that “all
-Yankee-doodledom blazed up like one universal soda bottle.” Many
-memorials of the second visit are preserved in Fields’s “Yesterdays
-with Authors,” and in John Forster’s “Life” both visits are of course
-recorded.
-
-[Illustration: CHARLES DICKENS
-
-_From a portrait by Francis Alexander, for many years in the Fields
-house, and now in the Boston Museum of Fine Arts_]
-
-There is, besides, one source of intimate record of Dickens in America
-which hitherto has remained almost untouched.[23] This is found in the
-diaries of Mrs. Fields, filled, as the preceding pages have shown, not
-merely with her own sympathetic observations, but with many things
-reported to her by her husband. To him it was largely due that Dickens
-crossed the Atlantic near the end of 1867. Landing in Boston, and soon
-beginning his extraordinarily popular readings, he found in the Charles
-Street house of the Fieldses a second home. “Steadily refusing all
-invitations to go out during the weeks he was reading,” wrote Fields
-in his “Yesterdays with Authors,” “he went only into one other house
-besides the Parker, habitually, during his stay in Boston.” In that
-house Mrs. Fields wrote the diaries from which the following passages
-are taken. There Dickens was not merely a warmly welcomed friend and
-guest at dinner, but for a time an inmate. Henry James, summoning after
-Mrs. Fields’s death his remembrances of her and of her abode, found in
-it “certain fine vibrations and dying echoes” of all the episode of
-Dickens’s second visit. “I liked to think of the house,” he wrote, “I
-couldn’t do without thinking of it, as the great man’s safest harborage
-through the tremendous gale of those even more leave-taking appearances,
-as fate was to appoint, than we then understood.”
-
-In Dickens’s state of physical health while the Fieldses were thus seeing
-him, lay the only token of an end not far off. All else was gayety and
-delight. The uncontrollable laughter—where does one hear quite parallel
-notes to-day?—the simplicities of game and anecdote, the enthusiastic
-yielding of complete admiration, the glimpses of august figures of an
-earlier time—all these serve equally to take one back over more than
-half a century, into a state of society about which an element of myth
-begins to form, and to bring out of that past the living, human figure of
-Dickens himself.
-
-For the most part these extracts from the diaries call for no
-explanations.
-
-Several months before the great visitor’s arrival his coming was heralded
-by his business agent, of whom Mrs. Fields wrote:—
-
- _August 14, 1867._—Mr. Dolby arrived today from England (Mr.
- Dickens’s agent), a good, healthy, kindly natured man of
- whom Dickens seems really fond, having followed him to the
- steamer in Liverpool from London to see that all things were
- comfortably arranged for him. He says Dickens has lamed one of
- his feet with too much walking of late. He is here to arrange
- for 100 nights, for which he hears he may receive $200,000; the
- readings to begin the first of December and to be chiefly given
- in New York City.
-
- _August 15, 1867._—Our day was quiet enough, but when J.
- came down, he held us quite spellbound and magnetized all the
- evening with his account of Dickens, which Mr. Dolby had given
- him. He says Dolby himself is a queer creature when he talks.
- He has a stutter which leads him to become suddenly stately in
- the middle of a homely phrase and to give a queer intonation to
- his voice, so that he did not dare look at Osgood (who was a
- listener also) lest they should both explode with laughter.
-
- Dickens now has five dogs; for these the cook prepares daily
- five plates of dinner. One day the plates were all ready when a
- small pup stole in and polished off the five plates. He fainted
- away immediately, and in this condition was discovered by the
- cook, who put him under the pump and revived him; but he had
- been going about looking like the figure 8 ever since.
-
- Dickens is a warm friend of Fechter. One day, returning from
- a reading tour, his man met him at the station saying, “The
- fifty-eight boxes have come, sir.” “What?” said Mr. Dickens.
- “The fifty-eight boxes have come, sir.” “I know nothing of
- fifty-eight boxes,” said the other. “Well, sir,” said the man,
- “they are all piled up outside the gate and we shall soon see,
- sir.” They proved to be a Swiss chalet complete, handles,
- blinds, not a bit wanting, which Fechter had sent him. It is
- put up in a grove near the house, where it presents a very
- picturesque effect.
-
- Dickens allows nothing to escape his attention and gives
- “one small corner of the white of one eye” to his household
- concerns, though he seems not to observe. His daughter Mary
- has the governance of the servants, Miss Hogarth of the cellar
- and provisions. There is a system in everything with which he
- has to do. When he gives a reading, he is present in the hall
- at half-past six, although the reading does not begin until
- eight; for Dickens cannot go about as other people do, he must
- go when the people do not press upon him. On reaching the
- private room, his servant brings his evening dress, reading
- desk, screen, lamps, when he arranges the hall, examines the
- copper gas-tubes to see if in order, dresses himself and is
- ready to begin. In Liverpool the other night he had advertised
- to read “Sergeant Buzfuz,” instead of which by accident he
- read “Bleak House.” Mr. Dolby spoke to him as soon as he had
- finished, telling him the mistake he had made. He at once
- returned to the desk, and said, “My friends, it is half-past
- ten o’clock and you see how tired I am, but I will still read
- Sergeant Buzfuz’s speech if you expect it.” “No, no,” the crowd
- shouted; “you’re tired. No, no, this ought to do for tonight.”
- One tall man raised himself up in the gallery and said, “Look
- here, we came to hear Pickwick and we ought to hef it.” “Very
- well, my friend,” replied Dickens, immediately, “I will read
- Sergeant Buzfuz for your accommodation solely”; and thereat he
- did read it to a breathless and delighted audience.
-
-[Illustration: “THE TWO CHARLES’S” (CHARLES DICKENS AND CHARLES FECHTER).
-
-_From a Humorous Drawing by_ ALFRED BRYAN, 1879.
-
-DICKENS AND FECHTER]
-
-At length came Dickens himself, and the diary takes up the tale:—
-
- _November 18, 1867._—Today the steamer is telegraphed with
- Dickens on board, and the tickets for his readings have been
- sold. Such a rush! A long queue of people have been standing
- all day in the street—a good-humored crowd, but a weary
- one.[24] The weather is clear but really cold, with winter’s
- pinch in it.
-
- _November 19._— ... Yesterday I adorned Mr. Dickens’s room with
- flowers, which seemed to please him. He was in the best of good
- spirits with everything.
-
- _Thursday, November 21._—Mr. Dickens dined here. Agassiz,
- Emerson, Judge Hoar, Professor Holmes, Norton, Greene, dear
- Longfellow, last not least, came to welcome. Dickens sat on
- my right, Agassiz at my left. I never saw Agassiz so full of
- fun....
-
- Dickens bubbled over with fun, and I could not help fancying
- that Holmes bored him a little by talking at him. I was sorry
- for this, because Holmes is so simple and lovely, but Dickens
- is sensitive, very. He is fond of Carlyle, seems to love nobody
- better, and gave the most irresistible imitation of him. His
- queer turns of expression often convulsed us with laughter, and
- yet it is difficult to catch them, as when, in speaking of the
- writer of books, always putting himself, his real self, in,
- “which is always the case,” he said; “but you must be careful
- of not taking him for his next-door neighbor.”
-
- He spoke of the fineness of his Parisian audience:—“the most
- delicately appreciative of all audiences.” He also gave a
- most ludicrous account of a seasick curate trying to read the
- service on board ship last Sunday. He tells us Browning is
- really about to marry Miss Ingelow, and of Carlyle, that he is
- deeply saddened, irretrievably, by the death of his wife. Just
- as we were in a tempest of laughter over some witticism of his,
- he jumped up, seized me by the hand, and said good-night. He
- neither smoked nor drank. “I never do either from the time my
- readings ‘set in,’” he said, as if it were a rainy season....
-
- Among other interesting personal facts Dickens told us that
- he had last year burned all his private letters. An appeal
- from the daughter of Sydney Smith for some of his letters set
- him thinking on the subject, and one day when there was a big
- fire—[sentence unfinished].
-
- Mr. Dickens left the table just as we were in a tempest of
- laughter. Dr. Holmes ... was telling how inappreciative he had
- found some country audiences—one he remembered in especial
- when his landlady accompanied him to the lecture and her face,
- he observed, was the only one which relaxed its grimness!
- “Probably because she saw money enough in the house to cover
- your expenses,” rejoined Dickens. That was enough; the laughter
- was prodigious....
-
- _Wednesday, November 27._—What a pity that these days have
- flown while I have been unable to make any record of them.
- J. has been to walk each day with Dickens, and has come home
- full of wonderful things he has said.[25] His variety is so
- inexhaustible that one can only listen in wonder.
-
- _Thursday, 28._—Thanksgiving Day. J. took Dickens to see the
- Aldriches’ house. He was very much amused by what he saw there
- and has written out a full account to his daughter, Mrs.
- Collins....
-
- I have made no record of our supper party of Wednesday evening.
- We had Alfred to wait, and a pretty supper and more important
- by far (tho’ the first a consequent of the last) a pretty
- company. There were Mr. Dickens and Mr. Dolby, Helen Bell and
- Mrs. Silsbee, Mr. and Mrs. Bigelow, Mr. Hillard and Louisa and
- Mr. Beal. Mrs. Bell sang a little before supper (“Douglas”
- for one) very gracefully with real feeling. At nine o’clock
- oysters and fun began; finally Mr. Dickens told several ghost
- stories, but none of them more interesting than a little bit
- of clairvoyance or what-you-will, which he let drop concerning
- himself. He said a story was sent to him for “All the Year
- Round,” which he liked and accepted; just after the matter had
- been put in type, he received a letter from another person
- altogether from the one who had forwarded it in the first
- place, saying that _he_ and not the first man was the author,
- and in proof of his position he supplied a date which was
- wanting in the first paper. Curiously enough, Mr. Dickens,
- seeing the story hinged upon a date and the date being but a
- blank in the MS., had supplied one, as it were by chance, and,
- behold! _it was the same date which the new man had sent_.
-
- _Sunday._—Dined with Mr. Dickens at six o’clock. Mr. and Mrs.
- Bigelow, Mr. Dolby and ourselves were the only guests.
-
- After dinner we played two or three games which I will set down
- lest they should be forgotten.
-
-Descriptions of “Buzz,” “Russian Scandal,” and another wholly innocent
-amusement may be omitted.
-
- _Monday night, December 2, 1867._—The first great reading! How
- we listened till we seemed turned into one eyeball! How we all
- loved him! How we longed to tell him all kinds of confidences!
- How Jamie and he did hug in the anteroom afterward! What a
- teacher he seemed to us of humanity as he read out his own
- words which have enchanted us from childhood! And what a house
- it was! Longfellow, Dana, Norton (Mrs. Dana, Jr., and the three
- little Andrews went with us), and a world of lovely faces and
- ardent admirers.
-
- Tuesday came Miss Dodge and Mrs. Hawthorne, Julian, and Rose.
- The reading was quite as remarkable, tho’ more quiet than that
- of the night before. As usual, we went to speak to him at his
- request after it was over. Found him in the best of spirits,
- but very tired. “You can’t think,” he said, “what resolution it
- requires to dress again after it is over!”
-
- _Monday, December 9._—Left home at 8 A.M. for New York. The
- day was clear and cold, the journey somewhat long, but on the
- whole extremely agreeable. We only had each other to plague
- or amuse, as the case might be, and we had the new Christmas
- story of Dickens and Wilkie Collins (called “No Thoroughfare”)
- to read, and so by sufficient attention to the peculiarities
- or follies or troubles of our neighbors and some forgetfulness
- of our own, we came to the Westminster Hotel at night, in
- capital spirits but _rather_ frozen physically. We had scant
- time to dress and dine and to go to the Dickens reading. We
- accomplished it, nevertheless. Saw the rapturous enthusiasm,
- heard the “Carol” far better read than in Boston, because the
- applause was more ready and he felt stimulated by it. Afterward
- Mr. D. sent for us to come to his room. He was fatigued, of
- course, but we sat at table with him and after a while he began
- to feel warmer as vigor returned. He brought out his jewels for
- us to see—a pearl Count D’Orsay once wore, set with diamonds,
- etc.—laughed and talked about the way we dress and other bits
- of nonsense suggested by the time, all turned towards the fine
- light of Charles Dickens’s lovely soul and returning with a
- fresh gleam of beauty. We left early lest we should overfatigue
- him.
-
- _Wednesday, December 11._—At four Dickens came to dinner in
- our room with Eythinge and Anthony, his American designer and
- engraver. Afterward we went to the “Black Crook” together, and
- then home to the hotel, where we sat talking until one o’clock.
- There is nothing I should like so much to do as to set down
- every word he said in that time, but much must go down to
- oblivion....
-
- He talked of actors and acting—said if a man’s Hamlet was a
- sustained conception, it was not to be quarrelled with; the
- only question was, what a man of melancholy temperament would
- do under such circumstances. Talked of Charles Reade and the
- greatness of “Griffith Gaunt,” and the pity of it that he did
- not stand on his own bottom instead of getting in with Dion
- Boucicault, etc., etc. But after dinner he unbent, and while we
- were in the box at the theatre showed how true his sympathies
- were with the actors, was especially careful to make no sound
- which could hurt their feelings by apparent want of attention.
- The play was very dull, so we sat and talked. He told me that
- no ballet dancer could have pretty feet, and one dreadful thing
- was they could never wash them, as water renders the feet
- tender and they must become horny. He asked about Longfellow’s
- sorrow again and expressed the deepest sympathy, but said he
- was like a man purified by suffering.
-
- We had punch in our room after the play, when he laughed till
- the tears ran down his cheeks over Bob Sawyer’s party and
- the remembrance of the laughter he had seen depicted on the
- faces of people the night before. Jack Hopkins was such a
- favorite with J. that D. made up the face again and went over
- the necklace story until we roared aloud. At length he began
- to talk of Fechter and to describe the sensitive character of
- the man. He saw him first quite by accident in Paris, having
- strolled into a little theatre there one night. He was making
- love to a woman, and so elevated her as well as himself by the
- sentiment in which he enveloped her that they trod into purer
- ether and in another sphere quite lifted out of the present.
- “‘By heavens!’ I said, ‘a man who can do this can do anything!’
- I never saw two people more purely and instantly elevated by
- the power of love. The manner in which he presses the hem of
- the dress of Lucy in the ‘Bride of Lammermoor’ is something
- surpassing speech and simply wonderful. The man has a thread
- of genius in him which is unmistakable, yet I should not call
- him a man of genius exactly, either.” Mr. Dickens described him
- as a man full of plans for plays, one who had lost much money
- as a manager, too. He was apt to come down to Gad’s Hill with
- his head full of plans about a play which he wished Mr. Dickens
- to write out and which Fechter would act in the writing-room,
- using Mr. Dickens’s small pillow for a baby in a manner to make
- the latter feel, if Fechter were but a writer, how marvellous
- his powers of representation would be. “I, who for so many
- years have been studying the best way of putting things, felt
- utterly amazed and distanced by this man.”
-
- Before the end of our talk Mr. Dickens became penetrated by
- the memory of his friend and brought him before us in all the
- warmth of ardent sympathy. Fechter is sure to come to this
- country: we are sure to have the happiness of knowing him (if
- we all live), and in that event I shall consider last night as
- the beginning of a new friendship.
-
-[Illustration: _Reduced facsimile of Dickens’s directions, preserved
-among the Fields papers, for the brewing of pleasant beverages_]
-
- _Sunday, December 22._—Another week has gone. We are again at
- home in our dear little nook by the Charles, and tonight the
- lover of Christmas comes to have dinner with us. We had a merry
- time last Sunday, and after we had separated the hotel must
- needs take fire—to be sure, I had been packing and was in my
- first sleep and knew nothing distinctly of it; but it was an
- escape all the same and Mr. Dickens rushed out to help, as he
- always seems to do....
-
- At night came Mr. Dickens and Mr. Dolby, Mr. Lowell and Mabel,
- Mr. and Mrs. Dorr, to dinner. It was really a beautiful
- Christmas festival, as we intended it should be for the love of
- this new apostle of Christmas. Mr. Dickens talked all the time,
- as he always will do, generously, when the moment comes that he
- sees it is expected, of Sir Sam. Baker, of Froude, of Fechter
- again, this time as if he did not know the man, but spoke
- critically as if he were a stranger, seeing Lowell’s face when
- his name was mentioned, which inclined itself sneeringly.
-
- We played games at table afterward, which turned out so queerly
- that we had storms of laughter.
-
- What a shame it is to write down anything respecting one’s
- contact with Charles Dickens and have it so slight as my
- accounts are; but the subtle turns of conversation are so
- difficult to render—the way in which he represents the woman
- who will not on any account be induced to look at him while
- he is reading, and at whom he looks steadily, endeavoring
- to compel the eyes to move—all these queer turns are too
- delicate to be set down. I thought I should have had a
- convulsion of laughter when Mrs. Dorr said Miss Laura Howe
- sat down in her (Mrs. D.’s) room and wrote out a charade in
- such an unparalleled and brilliant manner that nobody could
- have outshone her—not even the present company. “In the same
- given time, I trust?” said Dickens. “No, no,” said the lady,
- persistently.
-
- _December 31._—The year goes out clear and cold. The moon was
- marvellously bright last night, and every time I woke there she
- was with her attendant star looking freshly in upon us sleeping
- mortals in her eternal, unwearied way. We received a letter
- from Charles Dickens yesterday, saying he was coming to stay
- with us when he returns. What a pleasure this will be to us! We
- anticipate his coming with continual delight! To have him as
- much as we can, at morning, noon, and night.
-
-This letter, long preserved in an American copy of “A Christmas Carol” on
-the shelves of the Charles Street library, throws a light of its own on
-the physical handicaps with which Dickens was struggling through all this
-time.
-
- WESTMINSTER HOTEL, NEW YORK
-
- _Sunday, Twenty-Ninth December, 1867_
-
- MY DEAR FIELDS:—
-
- When I come to Boston for the two readings of the 6th and 7th I
- shall be alone, as Dolby must be selling elsewhere. If you and
- Mrs. Fields should have no other visitor, I shall be very glad
- indeed on this occasion to come to you. It is very likely that
- you may have some one with you. Of course you will tell me so
- if you have, and I will then reëmbellish the Parker House.
-
- Since I left Boston last, I have been so miserable that I
- have been obliged to call in a Dr.—Dr. Fordyce Barker, a very
- agreeable fellow. He was strongly inclined to stop the Readings
- altogether for some few days, but I pointed out to him how we
- stood committed, and how I must go on if it could be done.
- My great terror was yesterday’s Matinée, but it went off
- splendidly. (A very heavy cold indeed, an irritated condition
- of the uvula, and a restlessly low state of the nervous system,
- were your friend’s maladies. If I had not avoided visiting, I
- think I should have been disabled for a week or so.)
-
- I hear from London that the general question in society is,
- what will be blown up next by the Fenians.
-
- With love to Mrs. Fields, Believe me,
-
- Ever affectionately yours,
-
- And hers,
-
- CHARLES DICKENS
-
- _Saturday night, January 4._—All in readiness. Mr. Dickens
- arrived punctually with Mr. Osgood at half-past nine. Hot
- supper was soon in order and we put ourselves at it. The dear
- “chief” was in the best of good humor in spite of a cold which
- hangs about him and stuffs up head and throat, only leaving him
- for two hours at night when he reads. ’Tis something to be in
- first-rate mood with such a cold....
-
- The Readings have been so successful in New York he cannot fail
- to be pleased, and he does not fail to show it. Kate Field, New
- Year’s Eve, placed a basket of flowers on his table; he had
- seen her bright eyes and sensitive face, he said. I was glad
- for Kate, because he wrote her a little note, which pleased
- her, of course.
-
- _Wednesday, January 8_, 12 A.M.—I take up the pen again, having
- bade our guest a most unwilling farewell. Last night he read
- “Copperfield” and the Trial from “Pickwick.” It was an enormous
- house, packed in every extremity, receipts in gold about
- five hundred and ten pounds!! He was pleased, naturally, and
- read marvellously well even for him. He was somewhat excited
- and a good deal tired when he returned, and in spite of a
- light supper and stiff glass of punch, which usually contains
- soporific qualities, he could not sleep until near morning. He
- has been in the best of spirits during this visit—when he came
- downstairs last night to take a cup of coffee before leaving,
- he turned to J., saying, “The hour has almost come when I to
- sulphurous and tormenting gas must render up myself!” He has
- been afflicted with catarrh, which comes and goes and distracts
- him with a buzzing in his head. It usually leaves him for the
- two reading hours. This is convenient, but it probably returns
- with worse force.
-
- Sunday night dinner went off brilliantly. Longfellow, Appleton,
- Mr. and Mrs. Thaxter came to meet “the chief” and ourselves.
- Unfortunately there was one empty seat which Rowse, the artist,
- had promised to fill, but was ill at the last and could
- not—curiously enough we had asked Osgood, Miss Putnam, and Mr.
- Gay besides, all kept away by accident when they would have
- given their eyes to come. In the course of the day he had been
- to see (with O. W. H.) the ground of the Parkman murder which
- has lately been so clearly described by Sir Emerson Tennent in
- “All the Year Round”; in the evening the talk turned naturally
- enough that way, when, after much surmise with regard to the
- previous life of the man, Mr. Longfellow looked up and with an
- assured, clear tone, said: “Now I have a story to tell! A year
- or two before this event took place Dr. Webster invited a party
- of gentlemen to a dinner at this house, I believe to meet some
- foreigner who was interested in science. The doctor himself was
- a chemist, and after dinner he had a large bowl placed in the
- centre of the table with some chemical mixture in it which he
- set on fire after turning the lamp low. A lurid light came from
- the bowl which caused a livid look upon the faces of those who
- sat round the table, and while all were observing the ghastly
- effect, Dr. Webster rose and, pulling a bit of rope from
- somewhere about his person, put it around his neck, reached his
- head over the bowl to heighten the effect, hung it on one side,
- and lolled his tongue out to give the appearance of a man who
- had been hanged!!! The whole scene was terrible and ghastly in
- the extreme, and, remembered in the light of what followed, had
- a prescience frightful to contemplate.”[26]
-
- Appleton did not talk as much as usual, and we were rather
- glad; but Mrs. Thaxter’s story took strong hold on Dickens’s
- fancy, and he told me afterward that when he awaked in the
- night he thought of her. I have seldom sat at dinner with a
- gentleman more careful and fine in his choice and taste of
- food and drink than C. D. The idea of his ever passing the
- bounds of temperance is an absurdity not to be thought of for a
- moment. In this respect he is quite unlike Mr. Thackeray, who
- at times both ate and drank inordinately, and without doubt
- shortened his life by his carelessness in these particulars.
- John Forster, C. D.’s old friend, is quite ill with gout and
- some other ails, so C. D. writes him long letters full of
- his experiences. We breakfast at half-past nine punctually,
- he on a rasher of bacon and an egg and a cup of tea, always
- preferring this same thing. Afterward we talk or play with the
- sewing-machine or anything else new and odd to him. Then he
- sits down to write until one o’clock, when he likes a glass
- of wine and biscuit, and afterward goes to walk until nearly
- four, when we dine. After dinner, reading days, he will take
- a cup of strong coffee, a tiny glass of brandy, and a cigar,
- and likes to lie down for a short time to get his voice in
- order. His man then takes a portmanteau of clothes to the
- reading hall, where he dresses for the evening. Upon our return
- we always have supper and he brews a marvellous punch, which
- usually makes us all sleep like tops after the excitement. The
- perfect kindliness and sympathy which radiates from the man
- is, after all, the secret never to be told, but always to be
- studied and to thank God for. His rapid eyes, which nothing
- can escape, eyes which, when he first appears upon the stage,
- seem to interrogate the lamps and all things above and below
- (like exclamation points, Aldrich says), are unlike anything
- before in our experience. There are no living eyes like them,
- swift and kind, possessing none of the bliss of ignorance, but
- the different bliss of one who sees what the Lord has done and
- what, or something of what, he intends. Such charity! Poor man!
- He must have learned great need for that.... He is a man who
- has suffered, evidently. Georgina Hogarth he always speaks of
- in the most affectionate terms, such as “she has been a mother
- to my children,” “she keeps the list of the wine cellar, and
- every few days examines to see what we are now in want of.”
-
- I hardly know anything more amusing than when he begs not
- to be “set a-going” on one of his readings by a quotation
- or otherwise, and [it is] odd enough to hear him go on,
- having been so touched off. He has been a great student of
- Shakespeare, which appears often in his talk. His love of
- the theatre is something which never pales, he says, and the
- people who go upon the stage, however poor their pay or hard
- their lot, love it, he thinks, too well ever to adopt another
- vocation of their free will. One of the oddest sights a green
- room presents, he says, is when they are collecting children
- for a pantomime. For this purpose the prompter calls together
- all the women in the ballet and begins giving out their names
- in order, while they press about him, eager for the chance
- of increasing their poor pay by the extra pittance their
- children will receive. “Mrs. Johnson, how many?” “Two, sir.”
- “What years?” “Seven and ten.” “Mrs. B.”—and so on until the
- requisite number is made up. He says, where one member of
- a family obtains regular employment at the theatre, others
- are sure to come in after a time; the mother will be in the
- wardrobe, children in pantomime, elder sisters in the ballet,
- etc.
-
- When we asked him to return to us, he said he must be loyal to
- “the show,” and, having three or four men with him, ought to be
- at an hotel where he could attend properly to the business. He
- never forgets the needs of those who are dependent upon him, is
- liberal to his servants (and to ours also), and liberal in his
- heart to all sorts and conditions of men.
-
- I have one deeply seated hope, that he will read for the Freed
- people before he leaves the country; and I cannot help thinking
- he will....
-
-For more than a month from the time of this entry Dickens was carrying
-the triumph of his readings into other cities than Boston. There he had
-left a faithful champion in the person of Mrs. Fields, who wrote in her
-diary on January 26, 1868: “It is odd how prejudiced people have allowed
-themselves to become about Dickens. I seldom make a call where his name
-is introduced that I do not feel the injustice done to him personally,
-as if mankind resented the fact that he had excited more love than most
-men.” As his return to Boston drew near, she wrote, February 18th: “We
-are anticipating and doorkeeping for the arrival of our friend. Whatever
-unpleasant is said of Charles Dickens I take almost as if said against
-myself. It is so hard to help this when you love a friend.” On February
-21st there is the entry: “We go to Providence tonight to hear ‘Dr.
-Marigold.’ I have been full of plans for next week, which is to be a busy
-season with us of company.”
-
- _Saturday, February 22._—We have heard “Marigold”! To be
- sure, the audience was sadly stupid and unresponsive, but we
- were penetrated by it.... What a night we had in Providence!
- Our beds were comfortable enough, for which we were deeply
- thankful; but none of the party slept, I believe, except Mr.
- Dolby, and his rest was inevitably cut short in the morning
- by business. I believe I lay awake from pure pleasure after
- such a treat. Hearing “Marigold” and having supper afterward
- with the dear great man. We played a game at cards which was
- most curious—indeed, something more—so much more that I have
- forgotten to be afraid of him.
-
-In writing the chapter, “Glimpses of Emerson,” in “Authors and Friends,”
-Mrs. Fields drew freely upon the entry that here follows in its fullness.
-
- _Tuesday morning, February 25._—Somewhat fatigued. The
- “Marigold” went off brilliantly. He never read better nor was
- more universally applauded. Mr. Emerson came down to go, and
- passed the night here; of course we sat talking until late,
- he being much surprised at the artistic perfection of the
- performance. It was queer enough to sit by his side, for when
- his stoicism did at length break down, he laughed as if he must
- crumble to pieces at such unusual bodily agitation, and with
- a face on as if it hurt him dreadfully—to look at him was too
- much for me, already full of laughter myself. Afterward we all
- went in to shake hands for a moment.
-
- When we came back home Mr. Emerson asked me a great many
- questions about C. D. and pondered much. Finally he said, “I am
- afraid he has too much talent for his genius; it is a fearful
- locomotive to which he is bound and can never be free from it
- nor set at rest. You see him quite wrong, evidently; and would
- persuade me that he is a genial creature, full of sweetness
- and amenities and superior to his talents, but I fear he is
- harnessed to them. He is too consummate an artist to have a
- thread of nature left. He daunts me! I have not the key.”
-
- When Mr. Fields came in he repeated, “Mrs. Fields would
- persuade me he is a man easy to communicate with, sympathetic
- and accessible to his friends; but her eyes do not see
- clearly in this matter, I am sure.” “Look for yourself, dear
- Mr. Emerson,” I answered, laughing, “and then report to me
- afterward.”
-
- While we were enjoying ourselves in this way, a great change
- has come to the country. The telegram arrived during the
- Reading bringing the news of the President’s impeachment,
- 126 against 47. Since Johnson is to be thrust out, and since
- another revolution is upon us (Heaven help us that it be a
- peaceful one), we can only be thankful that the majority is
- so large. Mr. Dickens’s account of the ability of Johnson,
- of his apparent integrity and of his present temperance, as
- contrasted with the present (reported) failures of Grant in
- this respect, have made me shudder, for I presume Grant is
- inevitably the next man. Mrs. Agassiz was evidently pleased
- with the appearance of General Grant and his wife. She liked
- their repose of manner and ease; but I think this rather a
- shallow judgment because poise and ease of manner belong to
- the coarsest natures and to the finest; in the latter it is
- conquest; and this is why these qualities have so high a place
- in the esteem of man; but it is likewise the gift of society
- people who neither feel nor understand the varied natures with
- whom they come in contact.
-
- Longfellow is at work on a tragedy, of which no words are
- spoken at present. Today Mr. Dickens does not go out; he is
- writing letters home. Yesterday he and J. walked seven miles,
- which is about their average generally....
-
- _February 27._—Longfellow’s birthday. Last night Dickens
- went to a supper at Lowell’s and J. passed the evening with
- Longfellow. L.’s tragedy comes on apace. He looks to Fechter
- to help him. Dickens has doubtless done much to quicken him to
- write. He has two nearly finished in blank verse, both begun
- since this month came in. J. returned at half-past eleven,
- bringing an unread newspaper in his pocket which L. had lent
- him, telling him to read something to me about Dickens and
- return. Ah me! We could have cried as we read! It was the
- saddest of sad letters, written at the time the separation from
- his wife took place. The gentleman to whom he wrote it has died
- and the letter has stolen into print. I only hope the poor man
- may never see it.
-
- Tonight he reads “Carol” and “Boots” and sups here with
- Longfellow afterward.
-
-An entry in Mrs. Fields’s diary about two years later indicates with some
-clearness that she overestimated the sympathy between Longfellow and
-Dickens. After a visit from Longfellow, she wrote, May 24, 1870:—
-
- When Mr. L. talks so much and so pleasantly, I am curiously
- reminded of Dickens’s saying to Forster, who lamented that he
- did not see Longfellow upon his return to London, “It was not
- a great loss this time, Forster; he had not a word to say for
- himself—he was the most embarrassing man in all England!” It
- is a difference of temperament which will never let those two
- men come together. They have no handle by which to take hold of
- each other. Longfellow told a gentleman at his table when J.
- was present that Dickens saved himself for his books, there was
- nothing to be learned in private—he never talked!!
-
-To return to Dickens in Boston:—
-
- _Sunday, March 1._—What a week we have had! I feel utterly
- weary this morning, although I _did_ start up with exceeding
- bravery and walked four miles just after breakfast, in order
- to see that the flowers were right at church and to ask some
- people to dinner today who could not, however, come. The air
- was very keen and exciting and I did not know I was tired until
- I came back and collapsed. Our supper came off Thursday, but
- _without_ Dickens. His cold had increased upon him seriously
- and he was really ill after his long, difficult reading.
- But Longfellow was perfectly lovely, so easily pleased and
- so deeply pleased with my little efforts to make this day a
- festival time. Dickens and Whittier both sent affectionate and
- graceful notes when they found they really could not come. Our
- company stayed until two A.M., Emerson never more talkative and
- good. He is a noble purifier of the social atmosphere, always
- keeping the talk simple as possible but up to the highest pitch
- of thought and feeling.
-
- Friday, the Dana girls, Sallie and Charlotte, passed the night
- with us and went to the reading and shook hands with Mr.
- Dickens afterward. They were perfectly happy when they went
- away yesterday....
-
- [The walking match between Dolby and Osgood to which the
- following paragraph refers has already been mentioned. The
- elaborately humorous conditions of the contest, drawn up by
- Dickens, are printed in “Yesterdays with Authors.” “We have had
- such a funny paper from Dickens today,” Mrs. Fields had written
- in her diary, on February 5th, “that it can only describe
- itself—Articles drawn up arranging for a walk and dinner upon
- his return here, as if it were some fierce legal document.”]
-
- I had barely time yesterday, after the girls left, to dress
- and prepare some flowers and some lunch and make my way in
- a carriage, first to the Parker House at Mr. Dickens’s kind
- request, to see if all the table arrangements were perfect for
- the dinner. I found he had done everything he could think of
- to make the feast go off well and had really left nothing for
- me to suggest, so I turned about and drove over the mill-dam,
- following Messrs. Dickens, Dolby, Osgood, and Fields, who
- had left just an hour before on a walking match of six miles
- out and six in. This agreement was made and articles drawn
- up several weeks ago, signed and sealed in form by all the
- parties, to come off without regard to the weather. The wind
- was blowing strong from the north-west, very cold, and the snow
- blowing, too. They had turned and were coming back when I came
- up with them. Osgood was far ahead and, after saluting them all
- and giving a cheer for America, discovering too that they had
- refreshed on the way, I drove back to Mr. Osgood, keeping near
- him and administering brandy all the way in town. The walk was
- accomplished in precisely two hours forty-eight minutes. Of
- course Mr. Dickens stayed by his man, who was beaten out and
- out. They were all exhausted, for the snow made the walking
- extremely difficult, and they all jumped into carriages and
- drove home with great speed to bathe and sleep before dinner.
-
- At six o’clock we were assembled, eighteen of us, for dinner,
- looking our very best (I hope)—at least we all tried for that,
- I am sure—and sat punctually down to our elegant dinner. I
- have never seen a dinner more beautiful. Two English crowns
- of violets were at the opposite ends of the table and flowers
- everywhere arranged in perfect taste. I sat at Mr. Dickens’s
- right hand and next Mr. Lowell. Mrs. Norton sat the other side
- of our host, and he divided his attention loyally between us.
- He talked with me about Spiritualism as it is called, the
- humbug of which excites his deepest ire, although no one could
- believe more entirely than he in magnetism and the unfathomed
- ties between man and man. He told me many curious things about
- the traps which had been laid by well-meaning friends to bring
- him into “spiritual” circles. But he said, “If I go to a
- friend’s house for the purpose of exposing a fraud in which she
- believes, I am doing a very disagreeable thing and not what she
- invited me for. Forster and I were invited to Lord Dufferin’s
- to a little dinner with Home. I refused, but Forster went,
- saying beforehand to Lord Dufferin that Home would have no
- spirits about if he came. Lord Dufferin said, ‘Nonsense,’ and
- the dinner came off; but they were hardly seated at table when
- Home announced that there was an adverse influence present and
- the spirits would not appear. ‘Ah,’ said Forster, ‘my spirits
- in this case were clearer than yours, for they told me before I
- came that there would be no manifestations tonight.’”
-
- Speaking of dreams, he said he was convinced that no man
- (judging from his own experience, which could not be altogether
- singular, but must be a type of the experience of others),
- he believed no writer, neither Shakespeare nor Scott nor any
- other who had ever invented a character, had ever been known
- to dream about the creature of his imagination. It would be
- like a man’s dreaming of meeting himself, which was clearly an
- impossibility. Things exterior to oneself must always be the
- basis of our dreams. This talk about characters led him to say
- how mysterious and beautiful the action of the mind was around
- any given subject. “Suppose,” he said, “this wine-glass were a
- character, fancy it a man, endue it with certain qualities, and
- soon fine filmy webs of thoughts almost impalpable coming from
- every direction, and yet we know not from where, spin and weave
- around it until it assumes form and beauty and becomes instinct
- with life....”
-
- Mr. Lowell asked him some question in a low voice about the
- country, when I heard him say presently that it was very much
- grown up, indeed he should not know oftentimes that he was not
- in England, things went on so much the same and with very few
- exceptions (hardly worth mentioning) he was let alone precisely
- as he would have been there.
-
- He loves to talk of Gad’s Hill and stopped joyfully from other
- talk to tell me how his daughter Mary arranged his table with
- flowers. He speaks continually of her great taste in combining
- flowers. “Sometimes she will have nothing but water-lilies,” he
- said, as if the memory were a fragrance.
-
- Some one has said, “We cannot love and be wise.” I will gladly
- give away the inconsistent wisdom, for Jamie and I are truly
- penetrated with grateful love to C. D.
-
- _Wednesday, March 3._—Mr. Dickens came over last night with
- Messrs. Osgood and Dolby, to pass the evening and have a little
- punch and supper and a merry game with us....
-
- They left punctually before eleven, having promised the driver
- they would not keep him waiting in the cold. Jamie has every
- day long walks with him. He has told him much regarding the
- forms and habits of his life. He is fond of “Gad’s Hill,” and
- his “dear daughters” and their aunt, Miss Hogarth, make his
- home circle. What a dear one it is to him can be seen whenever
- his thought turns that way; and if his letters do not come
- punctually, he is in low spirits. He is a great actor and
- artist, but above all a great and loving and well-beloved man.
- (This I cling to in memory of Mr. Emerson’s dictum.)
-
- I am deep in Carlyle’s history and every little thing I hear
- chimes in with that. After _the_ dinner (at the Parker) the
- other night, Mr. Dickens thought he would take a warm bath;
- but, the water being drawn, he began playing the clown in
- pantomime on the edge of the bath (with his clothes on) for the
- amusement of Dolby and Osgood; in a moment and before he knew
- where he was, he had tumbled in head over heels, clothes and
- all. A second and improved edition of “Les Noyades,” I thought.
- Surely this book is a marvel of thought and labor. Why, why
- have I left it unknown to myself until now? I fear, unlike
- Lowell, it is because I could not read eighteen uninterrupted
- hours without apoplexy or some other ’exy, which would destroy
- what power I have forever.
-
- _March 6._—Mr. Dickens dined here last night without company
- except Messrs. Dolby and Osgood and Howells. We had a very
- merry time. They had been to visit the Cambridge Printing
- Office in the afternoon and had been shown so many things that
- “the chief” said he began to think he should have a bitter
- hatred against any mortal who undertook to show him anything
- else in the world, and laughed immoderately at J.T.F.’s
- proposition to show him the new fruit house afterward. We all
- had a game of Nincomtwitch and separated rather early because
- we were going to a party; and as C. D. shook me by the hand to
- say good-bye, he said he hoped we would have a better time at
- this party than _he_ ever had at any party in all _his_ life.
- A part of the dinner-time was taken up by half guess and half
- calculation of how far Mr. Dickens’s manuscript would extend
- in a single line. Mr. Osgood said 40 miles. J. said 100,000
- (!!). I believe they are really going to find out. C. D. said
- _he_ felt as if it would go farther than 40 miles, and was
- inclined to be “down” on Osgood until he saw him doing figures
- in his head after a fearful fashion. All this amusing talk
- served to give one a strange, weird sensation of the value of
- words over time and space; these little marks of immeasurable
- value covering so slight a portion of the rough earth! Howells
- talked a little of Venice, thought the Ligurians lived better
- than the Venetians. C. D. said they ate but little meat when
- _he_ lived in Genoa; chiefly “pasta” with a good soup poured
- over it....
-
- He leaves Boston today, to return the first of April, so I will
- end this poor little surface record here, hoping always that
- the new sheet shall have something written down of a deeper,
- simpler, and more inseeing nature.
-
-On the return of Dickens to Boston, Mrs. Fields dined with him at the
-Parker House, March 31, 1868, and, commenting on his lack of “talent” for
-sleeping, wrote in her diary:—
-
- I remember Carlyle says, “When Dulness puts his head upon
- his mattresses, Dulness sleeps,” referring to the apathetic
- people who went on their daily habits and avocations in Paris
- while men were guillotined by thousands in the next street.
- Mr. Dickens talked as usual, much and naturally—first of the
- various hotels of which he had late experience. The one in
- Portland was particularly bad, the dinner, poor as it was,
- being brought in small dishes, “as if Osgood and I should
- quarrel over it,” everything being very bad and disgusting
- which the little dishes contained.
-
- At last they came to the book, “Ecce Homo,” in which Dickens
- can see nothing of value, any more than we. He thinks
- Jesus foresaw and guarded as well as he could against the
- misinterpreting of his teaching, that the four Gospels are
- all derived from some anterior written Scriptures—made up,
- perhaps, with additions and interpolations from the “Talmud,”
- in which he expressed great interest and admiration. Among
- other things which prove how little the Gospels should be taken
- literally is the fact that _broad phylacteries_ were not in
- use until some years after Jesus lived, so that the passage in
- which this reference occurs, at least, must only be taken as
- conveying the spirit and temper, not the actual form of speech,
- of our Lord. Mr. Dickens spoke reverently and earnestly, and
- said much more if I could recall it perfectly.
-
- Then he came to “spiritualism” again, and asked if he had ever
- told us his interview with Colchester, the famous medium. He
- continued that, being at Knebworth one day, Lytton, having
- finished his dinner and retired to the comfort of his pipe,
- said: “Why don’t you see some of these famous men? What a
- pity Home has just gone.” (Here Dickens imitated to the
- life Lytton’s manner of speaking, so I could see the man.)
- “Well,” said D., “he went on to say so much about it that
- I inquired of him who was the next best man. He said there
- was one Colchester, if possible better than Home. So I took
- Colchester’s address, got Charley Collins, my son-in-law, to
- write to him asking an interview for five gentlemen and for
- any day he should designate, the hour being two o’clock. A day
- being fixed, I wrote to a young French conjuror, with whom
- I had no acquaintance but had observed his great cleverness
- at his business before the public, to ask him to accompany
- us. He acceded with alacrity. Therefore, with poor Chauncey
- Townshend, just dead, and one other person whom I do not at
- this moment recall, we waited upon Mr. Colchester. As we
- entered the room, I leading the way, the man, recognizing me
- immediately, turned deadly pale, especially when he saw me
- followed by the conjuror and Townshend, who, with his colored
- imperial and beard and tight-fitting wig, looked like a member
- of the detective police. He trembled visibly, became livid
- to the eyes, all of which was visible in spite of paint with
- which his face was covered to the eyes. He withdrew for a few
- minutes, during which we heard him in hot discussion with his
- accomplice, telling him how he was cornered and trying to
- imagine some way in which to get out of the trap, the other
- evidently urging him to go through with it now the best way he
- could. He returned, therefore, and placed himself with his back
- to the light, while it shone upon our faces. We sat awhile in
- silence until he began, insolently turning to me: ‘Take up the
- alphabet and think of somebody who is dead, pass your hands
- over the letters, and the spirit will indicate the name.’ I
- thought of Mary and took the alphabet, and when I came to M, he
- rapped; but I was sure that I had unconsciously signified by
- some movement and determined to be more skilful the next time.
-
- For the next letter, therefore, he went on to H, and then asked
- me if that was right. I told him I thought the spirits ought
- to know. He then began with some one else, but doing nothing
- he became hotter and hotter, the perspiration pouring from his
- face, until he got up, said the spirits were against him, and
- was about to withdraw. I then rose and told him that it was the
- most shameless imposition, that he had got us there with the
- intent to deceive and under false pretences, that he had done
- nothing and could do nothing. He offered to return our money—I
- said the fact of his taking the money at all was the point. At
- last the wretch said, turning to the Frenchman, ‘I did tell
- you one name, Valentine.’ ‘Yes,’ answered the young conjuror,
- with a sudden burst of English, ‘Yes, but I showed it to you!’
- indicating with a swift movement of the hand how he had given
- him a chance.” Then it was all up with Colchester, and more
- scathing words than those spoken by Dickens to him have been
- seldom spoken by mortal.
-
- It was the righteous anger of one trying to avenge and help the
- world. Mr. Dickens always seems to me like one who, working
- earnestly with his eyes fixed on the immutable, nevertheless
- finds to his own surprise that his words place him among the
- prophets. He does not arrogate a place to himself there; indeed
- he is singularly humble (as it seems to us) in the moral
- position he takes; but for all that is led by the Divine Hand
- to see what a power he is and in an unsought-for manner finds
- himself among the teachers of the earth. He says nowhere is
- a man placed in such an unfair position as at church. If one
- could only be allowed to get up and state his objections, it
- would be very well, but under the circumstances he declines
- being preached to.
-
-A few days later Mrs. Fields heard Dickens read the “Christmas Carol” for
-the last time in Boston.
-
- _Such_ a wonderful evening as it was!! We were on fire with
- enthusiasm and in spite of some people who went with us ...
- looking, as C. D. said, as if they were sorry they had come,
- they were really filled with enthusiasm, and enjoying as fully
- as their critical and crossed natures would allow. He himself
- was full of fun and put in all manner of queer things for our
- amusement; but what he put in, involuntarily, when he turned
- on a man who was standing staring fixedly at him with an opera
- glass, was almost more than we could bear. The stolidity of
- the man, the fixed glass, the despairing, annihilating look of
- Dickens were too much for our equanimity.
-
- _Thursday._—Anniversary of C. D.’s marriage day and of John
- Forster’s birthday. C. D. not at all well, coughing all the
- time and in low spirits. Mr. Dolby came in when J. was there in
- the morning to say there were two gentlemen from New Bedford
- (friends of Mr. Osgood’s) who wished to see him. Would he allow
- them to come in? “No, I’ll be damned if I will,” he said, like
- a spoiled child, starting up from his chair! J. was equally
- amused and astonished at the outburst, but sleeplessness,
- narcotics, and the rest of the crew of disturbers have done
- their worst. My only fear is he may be ill. However, they had a
- walk together towards noon and he revived, but coughed badly in
- the evening. I think, too, only $1300 in the house was bad for
- his spirits!
-
- _April 7._—Dickens ... told Jamie the other day in walking
- that he wrote “Nicholas Nickleby” and “Oliver Twist” at the
- same time for rival magazines from month to month. Once he was
- taken ill, with both magazines waiting for unwritten sheets. He
- immediately took steamer for Boulogne, took a room in an inn
- there, secure from interruption, and was able to return just in
- season for the monthly issues with his work completed. He sees
- now how the work of both would have been better done had he
- worked only upon one at a time.
-
- After the exertion of last evening he looked pale and
- exhausted. Longfellow and Norton joined with us in trying
- to dissuade him from future Readings after these two. He
- does not recover his vitality after the effort of reading,
- and his spirits are naturally somewhat depressed by the
- use of soporifics, which at length became a necessity....
- “Copperfield” was a tragedy last night—less vigor but great
- tragic power came out of it.
-
- _April 8._—In spite of a deluge of rain last night there was a
- large audience to hear Dickens, and Longfellow came as usual.
- He read with more vigor than the night before and seemed
- better.... The time approaches swiftly for our flight to New
- York. We dread to leave home and would only do it for _him_,
- besides, the pleasure must be much in the fact of trying to
- do something rather than in really doing anything, for I fear
- he will be too ill and utterly fatigued to care much about
- anything but rest.
-
- _Friday, April 10._—Left home at eight o’clock in the morning,
- found our dearly beloved friend C. D. already awaiting us, with
- two roses in his coat and looking as fresh as possible. It was
- my first ride in America in a compartment car. Mr. Dolby made
- the fourth in our little party and we had a table and a game of
- “Nincom” and “Casino” and talked and laughed and whiled away
- the time pleasantly until we arrived here at the Westminster
- Hotel in time for dinner at six. I was impressed all day long
- with the occasional languor which came over C. D. and always
- with the exquisite delicacy and quickness of his perception,
- something as fine as the finest woman possesses, which combined
- itself wondrously with the action of the massive brain and the
- rapid movement of those strong, strong hands. I felt how deeply
- we had learned to love him and how hard it would be for us to
- part.
-
- At dinner he gave us a marvellous description of his life as
- a reporter. It seems he invented (in a measure) a system of
- stenography for himself; this is to say he altered Gurney’s
- system to suit his own needs. He was a very young man, not yet
- 20, when at seven guineas a week he was engaged as reporter
- on the “Morning Chronicle,” then a very large and powerful
- paper. At this period the present Lord Derby, then Mr. Stanley,
- was beginning his brilliant career, and O’Connell, Shiel, and
- others were at the height of their powers. Wherever these men
- spoke a corps of reporters was detailed to follow them and
- with the utmost expedition forward verbatim reports to the
- “Chronicle.” Often and often he has gone by post-chaise to
- Edinburgh, heard a speech or a part of it (having instructions,
- whatever happened, to leave the place again at a certain hour,
- the next reporter taking up his work where he must leave it),
- and has driven all the way back to London, a bag of sovereigns
- on one side of his body and a bag of slips of paper on the
- other, writing, writing desperately all the way by the light of
- a small lamp. At each station a man on horseback would stand
- ready to seize the sheets already prepared and ride with them
- to London. Often and often this work would make him deadly
- sick and he would have to plunge his head out of the window
- to relieve himself; still the writing went steadily forward
- on very little slips of paper which he held before him, just
- resting his body on the edge of the seat and his paper on the
- front of the window underneath the lamp. As the station was
- reached, a sudden plunge into the pocket of sovereigns would
- pay the postboys, another behind him would render up the
- completed pages, and a third into the pocket on the other side
- would give him the fresh paper to carry forward the inexorable,
- unremitting work.
-
- At this period there was a large sheet started in which all
- the speeches of Parliament were reported verbatim in order
- to preserve them for future reference—a monstrous plan which
- fell through after a time. For this paper it was especially
- desired to have a speech of Mr. Stanley accurately reported
- upon the condition of Ireland, containing suggestions for
- the amelioration of the people’s suffering. It was a very
- long and eloquent speech and took many hours in the delivery.
- There were eight reporters upon the work, each to work
- three-quarters of an hour and then to retire to write out his
- portion and be succeeded by the next. It happened that the
- roll of reporters was exhausted before the speech came to an
- end and C. D. was called in to report the last portions, which
- were very eloquent. This was on Friday, and on Saturday the
- whole was given to the press and the young reporter ran down to
- the country for a Sunday’s rest. Sunday morning had scarcely
- dawned “when my poor father, who was a man of immense energy,
- surprised me by making his appearance. The speech had come into
- Mr. Stanley’s hands, who was most anxious to have it correctly
- given in order to have it largely circulated in Ireland, and he
- found it all bosh, hardly a word right, except at the beginning
- and the end. Sending immediately to the office, he had obtained
- my sheets, at the top of which, according to custom, the name
- of the reporter was written, and, finding the name of Dickens,
- had immediately sent in search of me. My father, thinking this
- would be the making of me, came immediately, and I followed him
- back to London. I remember perfectly the look of the room and
- of the two gentlemen in it as I entered—Mr. Stanley and his
- father. They were extremely courteous, but I could see their
- evident surprise at the appearance of so young a man. For a
- moment as we talked I had taken a seat extended to me in the
- middle of the room. Mr. Stanley told me he wished to go over
- the whole speech, and if I was ready he would begin. Where
- would I like to sit? I told him I was very well where I was
- and we would begin immediately. He tried to induce me to sit
- elsewhere or more comfortably, but at that time in the House
- of Commons there was nothing but one’s knees to write upon and
- I had formed the habit of it. Without further pause then he
- began, and went on hour after hour to the end, often becoming
- very much excited, bringing down his hand with violence upon
- the desk near which he stood and rising at the end into great
- eloquence.
-
- “In these later years we never meet without that scene
- returning vividly to my mind, as I have no doubt it does to his
- also, but I, of course, have never referred to it, leaving him
- to do so if he shall ever think fit.
-
- “Shiel was a small man with a queer high voice and spoke very
- fast. O’Connell had a fine brogue which he cultivated, and
- a magnificent eye. He had written a speech about this time
- upon the wrongs of Ireland, and, though he repeated it many,
- many times during three months when I followed him about the
- country, I never heard him give it twice the same, nor ever
- without being himself deeply moved.”[27]
-
- Mr. Dickens’s imitation of Bulwer Lytton is so vivid that
- I feel as if it were taking a glimpse at the man himself.
- His deaf manner of speaking he represents exactly. He says
- he is very brilliant and quick in conversation, and knows
- everything!! He is a conscientious and unremitting student
- and worker. “I have been surprised to see how well his books
- wear. Lately I have reread ‘Pelham’ and I assure you I found
- it admirable. His speech at the dinner given to me just before
- leaving was well written, full of good things, but delivered
- execrably. He lacks a kind of confidence in his own powers
- which is necessary in a good speaker.”
-
- Speaking of O’Connell, Mr. Dickens said there had been nobody
- since who could compare with him but John Bright, who is at
- present the finest speaker in England. Cobden was fond of
- reasoning, and hardly what would be called a brilliant speaker;
- but his noble truthfulness and devotion to the cause to
- which he had pledged himself made him one of the grandest of
- England’s great men. I asked about Mrs. Cobden. He told me she
- had been made very comfortable and in a beautiful manner. After
- her husband’s death, his affairs having become involved by some
- bad investment he had made, a committee of six gentlemen came
- together to consider what should be done to commemorate his
- great and unparalleled devotion to his country. The result was,
- instead of having a public subscription for Mrs. Cobden with
- the many unavoidable and disagreeable features of such a step,
- each of these gentlemen subscribed about £12,000, thus making
- £70,000, a sufficient sum to make her most comfortable for
- life....
-
- I have forgotten to say how in those long rides from Edinburgh
- the mud dashed up and into the opened windows of the
- post-chaise, nor how they would be obliged to fling it off from
- their faces and even from the papers on which they wrote. As
- Dickens told us, he flung the imaginary evil from him as he did
- the real in the days long gone, and we could see him with the
- old disgust returned. He said, by the way, that never since
- those old days when he left the House of Commons as a Reporter
- had he entered it again. His hatred of the falseness of talk,
- of bombastic eloquence, he had heard there made it impossible
- for him ever to go in again to hear anyone.
-
- _Sunday, April 12._—Last night we went to the circus together,
- C. D., J., and I. It is a pretty building. I was astonished
- at the knowledge C. D. showed of everything before him. He
- knew how the horses were stenciled, how tight the wire bridles
- were, etc. The monkey was, however, the chief attraction. He
- was rather drunk or tired last night and did not show to good
- advantage, but he knew how to do all the things quite as well
- as the men. When the young rope-dancer slipped (he was but an
- apprentice at the business, without wages, C. D. thought), he
- tried over and over again to accomplish a certain somersault
- until he achieved it. “That’s the law of the circus,” said C.
- D.; “they are never allowed to give up, and it’s a capital rule
- for everything in life. Doubtless this idea has been handed
- down from the Greeks or Romans and these people know nothing
- about where it came from. But it’s well for all of us.” ...
-
- At six o’clock Mr. Dickens and Mr. Dolby came in to dinner. He
- seemed much revived both in health and spirits, in spite of the
- weather....
-
- Dickens talked of Frédérick Lemaître; he is upwards of sixty
- years old now; but he has always lived a wretched life, a low,
- poor fellow; yet he will surprise the actors continually by the
- new points he will make. He will come in at rehearsal, go about
- the stage in an abject wretched manner, with clothes torn and
- soiled as he has just emerged from his vulgar, vicious haunts,
- and without giving sign or glimmer of his power. Presently he
- says to the prompter, who always has a tallow candle burning
- on his box, “Give me your candle”; then he will blow it out
- and with the snuff make a cross upon his book. “What are you
- going to do, Frédérick?” the actors say. “I don’t know yet;
- you’ll see by and by,” he says, and day after day perhaps will
- pass, until one night when he will suddenly flash upon them
- some wonderful point. They, the actors, watching him, try to
- hold themselves prepared, and if he gives them the least hint
- will mould their parts to fit his. Sometimes he will ask for
- a chair. “What will you do with it, Frédérick?” He does not
- reply, but night after night the chair is placed there until he
- makes his point. He often comes hungry to the theatre, and the
- manager must give him a dinner and pay for it before he will go
- on. Fechter, from whom these particulars come, tells Dickens
- that there can be nothing more wonderful than his acting in the
- old scene of the miserable father who kills his own son at the
- inn. The son, coming in rich and handsome, and seeing this old
- sot about to be driven from the porch by the servant, tells
- the man to give him meat and wine. While he eats and drinks,
- the wretch sees how freely the rich man handles his gold and
- resolves to kill him. Fechter’s description, with his own
- knowledge of Lemaître, had so inspired Dickens that he was able
- to reproduce him again for us.
-
- _Wednesday, April 15._—[On returning from a reading in
- “Steinway Hall, than which nothing could be worse for reading
- or speaking”]: He soon came up after a little soup, when he
- called for brandy and lemons and made _such_ a burnt brandy
- punch as has been seldom tasted this side of the “pond.” As
- the punch blazed his spirits rose and he began to sing an
- old-fashioned comic song such as in the old days was given
- between the plays at the theatre. One song led to another until
- we fell into inextinguishable laughter, for anything more comic
- than his renderings of the chorus cannot be imagined. Surely
- there is no living actor who could excel him in these things
- if he chose to exert his ability. His rendering of “Chrush ke
- lan ne chouskin!!” or a lingo which sounded like that (the
- refrain of an old Irish song) was something tremendous. We
- laughed till I was really afraid he would make himself too
- hoarse to read the next night. He gave a queer old song full of
- rhymes, obtained with immense difficulty and circumlocution,
- to the word “annuity,” which it appeared has been sought
- by an old woman with great _assiduity_ and granted with
- immense _incongruity_. The negro minstrels have in great part
- supplanted these queer old English, Irish, and Scotch ballads,
- but they are sure to come up again from time to time. We did
- not separate until 12, and felt the next morning (as he said)
- as if we had had a regular orgy. They did not forget, Dolby and
- he, to pay a proper tribute to “Maryland, My Maryland,” and
- “Dixie” as very stirring ballads.
-
- [After another reading, from which Dickens came home extremely
- tired]: We ran in at once to talk with him and he soon cheered
- up. When I first pushed open the door he was a perfect picture
- of prostration, his head thrown back without support on the
- couch, the blood suffusing his throat and temples again where
- he had been very white a few minutes before. This is a physical
- peculiarity with Dickens which I have never seen before in a
- man, though women are very subject to that thing. Excitement
- and exercise of reading will make the blood rush into his hands
- until they become at times almost black, and his face and head
- (especially since he has become so fatigued) will turn from red
- to white and back to red again without his being conscious of
- it.
-
- _Friday, April 17._—Weather excessively warm, sky often
- overcast. Last evening Mr. Dickens read again and for the last
- time “Copperfield” and “Bob Sawyer.” He was much exhausted
- and said he watched a man who was carried out in a fainting
- condition to see how they managed it, with the lively interest
- of one who was about to go through the same scene himself.
- The heat from the gas around him was intolerable. After the
- reading we went into his room to have a little soup, “broiled
- bones,” and a sherry cobbler. His spirits were good in spite of
- fatigue, the thought of home and the memories of England coming
- back vividly. We, finally, from talk of English scenery, found
- ourselves in Stratford. He says there is an inn at Rochester,
- very old, which he has no doubt Shakespeare haunted. This
- conviction came forcibly upon him one night as he was walking
- that way and discovered Charles’s Wain setting over the chimney
- just as Shakespeare has described. “When you come to Gad’s
- Hill, please God, I will show you Charles’s Wain setting over
- the old roof.”
-
- We left him early, hoping he would sleep, but he hardly closed
- his eyes all night. Whether he was haunted by visions of home,
- or what the cause was, we cannot discover, but whatever it
- may be, his strength fails under such unnatural and continual
- excitement.
-
- _Saturday, April 18._—Mr. Dickens has a badly sprained foot.
- We like our rooms at his hotel—47 is the number. Last night
- was “Marigold” and “Gamp” for the last time. He threw in a few
- touches for our amusement and a great deal of vigor into the
- whole. Afterward we took supper together, when he told us some
- remarkable things. Among others he rehearsed a scene described
- to him years ago by Dr. Eliotson of London of a man about to
- be hanged. His last hour had approached as the doctor entered
- the cell of the criminal, who was as justly sentenced as ever a
- wretch was for having cut off the end of his own illegitimate
- child. The man was rocking miserably in his chair back and
- forth in a weak, maudlin condition, while the clergyman in
- attendance, who had spoken of him as repentant and religious in
- his frame of mind, was administering the sacrament. The wine
- stood in a cup at one side until the sacred words were said,
- when at the proper moment the clergyman gave it to the man,
- who was still rocking backward and forward, muttering, “What
- will my poor mother think of this?” Finding the cup in his
- hands, he looked into it for a moment as if trying to collect
- himself, and then, putting on his regular old pothouse manner,
- he said, “Gen’lemen, I drink your health,” and drained the
- cup in a drunken way. “I think,” said C. D., “it is thirty
- years since I heard Dr. Eliotson tell me this, but I shall
- never forget the horror that scene inspired in my mind.” The
- talk had taken this turn from the fact of a much-dreaded Press
- dinner which is to come off tonight and which jocosely assumed
- the idea of a hanging to their minds. C. D. said he had often
- thought how restricted one’s conversation must become with a
- man who was to be hanged in half an hour. “You could not say,
- if it rains, ‘We shall have fine weather tomorrow!’ for what
- would that be to him? For my part, I think I should confine
- my remarks to the times of Julius Cæsar and King Alfred!!” He
- then related a story of a condemned man out of whom no evidence
- could be elicited. He would not speak. At last he was seated
- before a fire for a few moments, just before his execution,
- when a servant entered and smothered what fire there was with
- a huge hodful of coal. “_In half an hour that will be a good
- fire_,” he was heard to murmur.
-
- Mr. Dickens has now read 76 times. It seems like a dream.
-
- _Sunday, April 19._—Last night the great New York Press dinner
- came off. It was a close squeeze with Mr. Dickens to get there
- at all. He had been taken lame the night before, his foot
- becoming badly swollen and painful. In spite of a skilful
- physician he grew worse and worse every hour, and when the
- time for the dinner arrived he was unable to bear anything
- upon his foot. So long as he was above ground, however, it
- was a necessity he should go, and an hour and a half after
- the time appointed, with his foot sewed up in black silk, he
- made his way to Delmonico’s. Poor man! Nothing could be more
- unfortunate, but he bore this difficult part off in a stately
- and composed manner as if it were a sign of the garter he
- were doffing for the first time instead of a badge of ill
- health. The worst of it is that the papers will telegraph news
- of his illness to England. This seems to disturb him more
- than anything else. Ah! What a mystery these ties of love
- are—such pain, such ineffable happiness—the only happiness.
- After his return he repeated to me from memory every word of
- his speech without dropping one. He never thinks of such a
- thing as writing his speeches, but simply turns it over in
- his mind and “balances the sentences,” when he is all right.
- He produced an immense effect on the Press of New York,
- tremendous applause responding to every sentence. Curtis’s
- speech was very beautiful. “I think him the very best speaker
- I ever heard,” said C. D. “I am sure he would produce a great
- effect in England from the sympathetic quality he possesses.”
- I have seldom seen a finer exercise of energy of will than Mr.
- Dickens’s attendance on this dinner. It brought its own reward,
- too, for he returned with his foot feeling better. He made a
- rum punch in his room, where we sat until one o’clock. After
- repeating his speech, he gave us an imitation of old Rogers as
- he would repeat a quatrain:—
-
- “The French have sense in what they do
- Which we are quite without,
- For what in Paris they call _goût_
- In England we call _gout_.”
-
- Mr. Dolby sat at dinner near a poor bohemian of great keenness
- of mind, Henry Clapp, by name, who said some things worthy
- of Rivarol or any other wittiest Frenchman we might choose
- to select. Speaking of Horace Greeley (the chairman at the
- dinner), he said: “He was a self-made man and worshipped his
- creator.” Of Dr. O——, a vain and popular clergyman, that “he
- was continually looking for a vacancy in the Trinity.” Of
- Mr. Dickens, that “nothing gave him so high an idea of Mr.
- Dickens’s genius as the fact that he created Uriah Heep without
- seeing a certain Mr. Young (who sat near them), and Wilkins
- Micawber without being acquainted with himself (Henry Clapp).”
- Of Henry T—— that “he aimed at nothing and always hit the mark
- precisely.”
-
- This speech of Mr. Dickens will make a fine effect, a
- reactionary effect, in the country. The enthusiasm for him knew
- no bounds. Charles Norton spoke for New England. I had a visit
- from him this morning as well as from Mr. Osgood, Dolby, etc.
- C. D. lunched at the Jockey Club with Dr. Barker and Donald
- Mitchell and returned to dine with us. He talked of actors,
- artists, and the clergy—church and religion—but was evidently
- suffering more or less all the time with his foot, yet kept up
- a good heart until nine o’clock, when he retired to the privacy
- of his own room. He feels bitterly the wrong under which
- English dissenters have labored for years in being obliged not
- only to support their own church interests in which they _do_
- believe, but also the abuses of the English Church against
- which their whole lives are a continual protest. He spoke of
- the beauty of the landscape through which we had both been
- walking and driving under a grey sky, with the eager spring
- looking out among leafless branches and dancing in the red and
- yellow sap. He said it had always been a fancy of his to write
- a story, keeping the whole thing in the same landscape, but
- picturing its constantly varying effects upon men and things
- and chiefly, of course, upon the minds of men. He asked me if I
- had ever read Crabbe’s “Lover’s Ride.” We became indignant over
- a tax of five per cent which had just been laid upon the entire
- proceeds of his Readings, telegraphed to Washington, and found
- that it was unjust and had been taken off.
-
- _Monday, April 20._—Attended a meeting of a new “institution”
- just on foot, first called “Sorosis” and afterwards “Woman’s
- League” for the benefit and mutual support of women. It was the
- first official meeting, but it proved so unofficial that I was
- entertained, and amused as well, and was able on my return to
- make Mr. Dickens laugh until he declared if anything could make
- him feel better for the evening that account of the Woman’s
- League would.
-
- _Tuesday._—I find it very difficult today to write at all. Mr.
- Dickens is on his bed and has been unable to rise, in spite of
- efforts all day long.... Mr. Norton has been here and we have
- been obliged to go out, but our hearts have been in that other
- room all the time where our dear friend lies suffering.... Oh!
- these last times—what heartbreak there is in the words. I lay
- awake since early this morning (though we did not leave him
- until half-past twelve) feeling as if when I arose we must
- say good-bye. How relieved I felt to brush the tears away and
- know there was one more day, but even that gain was lessened
- when I found he could not rise and even this must be a day of
- separation too. When Jamie told him last night he felt like
- erecting a statue to him because of his heroism in doing his
- duty so well, he laughed and said, “No, don’t; take down one of
- the old ones instead!”
-
-The diary goes on to express the genuine sorrow of Mrs. Fields and her
-husband at parting from a friend who had so completely absorbed their
-affection, but in terms which the diarist herself would have been the
-first to regard as more suitable for manuscript than for print. The pages
-that contain them throw more light upon Mrs. Fields—a warm and tender
-light it is—than upon Dickens. There is, however, one paragraph, written
-after the Fieldses had returned to Boston from New York, which tells
-something both of Dickens and of Queen Victoria, in whose personality
-the public interest appears to be perpetual; and with this passage the
-quotations from the diary shall end.
-
-[Illustration: FACSIMILE PLAY-BILL OF “THE FROZEN DEEP,” WITH DICKENS AS
-ACTOR-MANAGER]
-
- _Friday, April 24._—After the Press dinner in New York Mr.
- Dickens repeated all his speech to me, as I believe I have
- said above, never dropping a word. “I feel,” he said, “as if I
- were listening to the sound of my own voice as I recall it. A
- very curious sensation.” Jamie asked him if Curtis was quite
- right in the facts of his speech. He said, “Not altogether,
- as, for instance, in that matter about the Queen and our
- little play, ‘Frozen Deep.’ We had played it many times with
- considerable success, when the Queen heard of it and Colonel
- Phipps (?) called upon me and said he wished the Queen could
- see the play. Was there no hall which would be appropriate for
- the occasion? What did I think of Buckingham Palace? I replied
- that could not be, for my daughters played in the piece and I
- had never asked myself to be presented at court nor had I ever
- taken the proper steps to introduce them there, and of course
- they could not go as amateur performers where they had never
- been as visitors. This seemed to trouble him a good deal, so I
- said I would find some hall which would be appropriate for the
- purpose and would appoint an evening, which I did immediately,
- taking the Gallery of Illustration and having it fitted up for
- the purpose. I then drew up a list of the company, chiefly of
- artists, literary and scientific men, and interesting ladies,
- which I caused to be submitted to the Queen, begging her to
- reject or add as she thought proper, setting aside forty seats
- for the royal party. The whole thing went off finely until
- after the first play was over, when the Queen sent round a
- request that I would come and see her. This was considered an
- act of immense condescension and kindness on her part, and the
- little party behind the scenes were delighted. Unfortunately,
- I had just prepared myself for the farce which was to follow
- and was already standing in motley dress with a red nose. I
- knew I could not appear in that plight, so I begged leave to
- be excused on that ground. However, that was forgiven and
- all passed off well, although the large expense of the whole
- thing of course fell on me, which amounted to one hundred and
- fifty or two hundred pounds. Several years after, when Prince
- Albert died, the Queen sent to me for a copy of the play. I
- told Colonel Phipps the play had never been printed and was the
- property of a gentleman, Mr. Wilkie Collins. Then would I have
- it copied? So I had a very beautiful copy made and bound in the
- most perfect manner, and presented to her Majesty. Whereupon
- the Princess of Prussia, seeing this, asked for another for
- herself. I said I would again ask the permission of Mr. Collins
- and again I had a beautiful copy made with great labor. Then
- the Queen sent to ask the price of the books. I sent word that
- my friend, Mr. Wilkie Collins, was a gentleman who would, I was
- sure, hear to nothing of the kind and begged her acceptance of
- the volumes.” “How has the Queen shown her gratitude for such
- favors?” I said. “We have never heard anything more from her
- since that time.” Good Mr. Dolby said quietly, “You know in
- England we call her ‘Her Ungracious Majesty.’” Certainly one
- would not have believed it possible for even a queen’s nature
- to have become so hardened as this to the kindly acts of any
- human being, not to speak of the efforts of one of her most
- noble subjects and perhaps the greatest genius of our time.
-
-If any reader wishes to follow the further course of the friendship
-between Dickens and the Fieldses, he has only to turn to “Yesterdays
-With Authors,” in which many letters written by Dickens after April,
-1868, are quoted, and many remembrances of their intercourse when the
-Fieldses visited England in 1869, the year before Dickens’s death, are
-presented. Here it will suffice to quote one out of several passages in
-Mrs. Fields’s diary relating to Dickens, and to bring to light a single
-characteristic little note from Dickens, not hitherto printed.
-
-On Wednesday, May 12, 1869, Mrs. Fields wrote of Dickens:—
-
- He drove us through the Parks in the fashionable afternoon
- hour and afterward to dine with him at the St. James, where
- Fechter and Dolby were the only outsiders. Mrs. Collins was
- like one of Stothard’s pictures. I felt this more even after
- refreshing my memory of Stothard’s coloring at the Kensington
- Museum yesterday. C. D. told me that the book of all others
- which he read perpetually and of which he never tired, the book
- which always appeared more imaginative in proportion to the
- fresh imagination he brings to it, a book for inexhaustiveness
- to be placed before every other book, is Carlyle’s “French
- Revolution.” When he was writing “A Tale of Two Cities,” he
- asked Carlyle if he might see some book to which he referred in
- his history. Whereat Carlyle sent down to him all his books,
- and Dickens read them faithfully; but the more he read the
- more he was astounded to find how the facts but passed through
- the alembic of Carlyle’s brain and had come out and fitted
- themselves each as a part of the one great whole, making a
- compact result, indestructible and unrivalled, and he always
- found himself turning away from the books of reference and
- rereading this marvellous new growth from those dry bones with
- renewed wonder.
-
-The note from Dickens read:—
-
- GAD’S HILL PLACE
- HIGHAM BY ROCHESTER, KENT
-
- _Wednesday Sixth October, 1869_
-
- MY DEAR FIELDS:—
-
- Delighted to enjoy the prospect of seeing you and yours on
- Saturday. Wish you had been at Birmingham. Wish you were not
- going home. Wish you had had nothing to do with the Byron
- matter.[28] Wish Mrs. Stowe was in the pillory. Wish Fechter
- had gone over when he ought. Wish he may not go under when he
- oughtn’t.
-
- With love,
-
- Ever affectionately yours,
-
- CHARLES DICKENS
-
-[Illustration: _Facsimile note from Dickens to Fields_]
-
-Among the papers preserved by Mrs. Fields there are, besides the
-manuscript letters of Dickens himself, many letters written after his
-death by his sister-in-law, Miss Georgina Hogarth. From bits of these,
-and especially from a letter written by Dickens’s daughter, while his
-death was still a poignant grief, the affection in which he was held in
-his own household is touchingly imaged forth.
-
-“All the Old World,” wrote Miss Dickens, “all the New World loved him.
-He never had anything to do with a living soul without attaching them to
-him. If strangers could so love him, you can tell a little what he must
-have been to his own flesh and blood. It is a glorious inheritance to
-have such blood flowing in one’s veins. I’m so glad I have never changed
-my name.”
-
-From one of Miss Hogarth’s letters a single passage may be taken, since
-it adds something of first-hand knowledge to the accessible facts about
-one piece of Dickens’s writing which—in so far as the editor of these
-pages is aware—has never seen the light of print. This letter was written
-in the September after Dickens’s death:
-
-“I must now tell you about the beautiful little New Testament which he
-wrote for his children. I am sorry to say it is _never to be published_.
-It happens that he expressed that decided determination only last autumn
-to me, so we have no alternative. He wrote it years ago when his elder
-children were quite little. It is about sixteen short chapters, chiefly
-adapted from St. Luke’s Gospel, most beautiful, most touching, most
-simple, as such a narrative should be. He never would have it printed
-and I used to read it to the little boys in MS. before they were old
-enough to read _writing_ themselves. When Charley’s children became old
-enough to have this kind of teaching, I promised Bessy (his wife) that
-I would make her a copy of this History, and I determined to do it as
-a Christmas Gift for her last year, but before I began my copy I asked
-Charles if he did not think it would be well for him to have it printed,
-at all events for _private_ circulation, if he would not publish it
-(though I think it is a pity he would never do that!). He said he would
-look over the MS. and take a week or two to consider. At the end of the
-time he gave it back to me and said he had decided _never to publish
-it—or even have it privately printed_. He said I might make a copy for
-Bessy, or for any one of his children, _but for no one else_, and that
-he also begged that we would never even lend the MS., or a copy of it,
-to any one to take out of the house; so there is no doubt about his
-_strong feeling_ on the subject, and we must obey it. I made my copy for
-Bessy and gave it to her last Christmas. After his death the original
-MS. became _mine_. As it was never published, of course it did not count
-as one of Mr. Forster’s MSS., and therefore it was one of his private
-papers, which were left to me. So I gave it at once to Mamie, who was, I
-thought, the most natural and proper possessor of it, as being his eldest
-daughter. You must come to England and read it, dear Friend! as we must
-not send it to you! We should be glad to see you and to show it to you
-and Mr. Fields in our own house.”
-
-Miss Hogarth must have known full well that, if this manuscript Gospel
-according to Charles Dickens was to be shown to anybody outside his
-immediate circle, he himself would have chosen the Charles Street friends
-from what he called—to them—his “native Boston.”
-
-
-
-
-VI
-
-STAGE FOLK AND OTHERS
-
-
-Had anyone crossed the Charles Street threshold of the Fieldses with the
-expectation of encountering within none but the New England Augustans, he
-would soon have found himself happily disillusioned, even at a time when
-there was no Dickens in Boston. As it was in reality, so must it be in
-these pages, if they are to fulfill their purpose of restoring a vanished
-scene, the variety of which must indeed be counted among its most
-distinctive characteristics. The pages that follow will accordingly serve
-to illustrate the familiar fact that the pudding of a “family party” is
-often rendered the more acceptable by the introduction of a few plums not
-plucked from the domestic tree.
-
-Mrs. Fields once noted in her diary the circumstance that, when her
-husband came to Boston from Portsmouth at the age of fourteen, and began
-to work as a “boy” in the bookshop of Carter & Hendee, the second of
-these employers had a box at the theatre and, to keep his young employees
-happy, used constantly to ask one or more of them to see a play in his
-company. Thus enabled in his youth to see such actors as the elder Booth,
-Fanny Kemble and her father, and many others of the best players to
-be seen in America at the time, Fields acquired a love of the theatre
-and of stage folk which stood him in good stead throughout his life.
-A certain exuberance in his own nature must have sought a response
-in social contacts other than those of the straiter sect of his local
-contemporaries. In men and women of the stage, in authors from beyond
-the compass of the local horizon, writers with whom he formed relations
-in his double capacity of editor and publisher, in artists and public
-men outside the immediate “literary” circle of Boston, Fields took an
-unceasing delight, shared by his wife, and still communicable through her
-journals.
-
-[Illustration: JAMES T. FIELDS AT FIFTEEN
-
-_From a drawing by a French painter_]
-
-From their pages, then, I propose to assemble here a group of passages
-relating first to stage folk, and then to others, and, since these
-records so largely explain themselves, to burden them as lightly as
-possible with explanations. Slender as certain of the entries are, each
-contributes something to a recovery of the time and of the persons that
-graced it.
-
-Thomas Bailey Aldrich, says his biographer, used to declare in his later
-years, “Though I am not genuine Boston, I am Boston-plated.” His intimate
-relation with Boston began in 1865, through the publication of a “Blue
-and Gold” edition of his poems by the firm of which Fields was a member,
-and the beginning of his editorship of “Every Saturday,” an illustrated
-journal issued under the same auspices. His range of acquaintance
-before that time was such that when the “plating” process began,—it was
-really more like a transmutation of metals,—he sometimes served as a
-sympathetic link between his new Boston and his old New York. It was
-in New York, only a few weeks after the assassination of Lincoln, that
-Aldrich appears in the diary, fresh from seeing his friend, Edwin Booth.
-
- _May 3, 1865._—An hour before we went to tea, Aldrich came to
- see us. He said he and Launt Thompson were staying with Edwin
- Booth alternate nights during this season of sorrow; that it
- was “all right between himself and the lady he was about to
- marry.” Then he described to us the first night while Booth
- was plunged in agony. He said the gas was left burning low
- and the bed stood in the corner, just where he lay sleepless,
- looking at a fearfully good crayon portrait of Wilkes Booth
- which glared at him over the gas. Launt Thompson started with
- the mother from New York for Philadelphia, where she was going
- to join her daughter the day that John Wilkes was shot, and an
- extra containing the news was brought them by a newsboy as they
- stepped on the ferry-boat. The old woman would have the paper.
- “He was her ‘Johnny’ after all,” said T. B. A.
-
- _Friday._—Have seen a lady who knows the person to whom Booth
- is engaged—said that her letter telling him she was true passed
- his letter of relinquishment on its way to Philadelphia. She
- thinks these two women have saved Booth. “I have been loved too
- well,” he said once....
-
- Aldrich said we should not have been more astonished to hear he
- himself had done the terrible deed than he was to know Wilkes
- Booth had done it. “He was so gentle, gentler than I, and very
- handsome—a slight, beautiful figure,” and (as he described the
- face, it was the Greek Antinous kind of beauty there) I could
- not but reflect how the deed may deform the man. Nobody said he
- was beautiful after he was dead, but they laid a cloth upon the
- face and said how dreadful. It has been a strange experience to
- come among the people who know the family. I hoped I should be
- spared this, but the soul of good in things evil God means we
- should all see.
-
- _Sunday, May 7._—A radiant day. Went to hear Dr. Bellows—a
- grand discourse. After service sat in his drawing-room and
- talked and then walked together.... He too has been to see
- Edwin Booth. The poor fellow said to him, “Ah! if it had been a
- fellow like myself who had done this dreadful deed, the world
- would not have wondered—but Johnny!!”
-
- _Wednesday, January 3, 1866._—Dined with the Grahams and went
- to see Booth upon the occasion of his reappearance. The unmoved
- sadness of the young man and the unceasing plaudits of the
- house, half filled with his friends, were impressive and made
- it an occasion not to be forgotten.
-
-[Illustration: _Facsimile note from Booth to Mrs. Fields_]
-
- _September 23, 1866._—Edwin Booth and the Aldriches came to
- tea; also Tom Beal and Professor Sterry Hunt of Montreal, the
- latter late. Booth came in the twilight while a magnificent red
- and purple and gold sunset was staining the bay. The schooners
- anchored just off shore had already lighted their lanterns
- and swung them in the rigging, and the full moon cast a silver
- sheen over the scene. I hear he passes every Sunday morning
- while here at the grave of his wife in Mt. Auburn. He seems
- deeply saddened. He was very pleasant, however, and ready to
- talk, and gave amusing imitations—in particular of his black
- boy, Jan, who possesses, he says, the one accomplishment of
- forgetting everything he ought to remember. One day a man
- with a deep tragic voice, “Forrestian,” he said, came to him
- with letters of introduction asking Mr. Booth to assist him
- as he was about to go to England. Mr. B. told him he knew no
- one in England and could do nothing for him, he was sorry. If
- he ever found it possible to do him a service he would with
- pleasure. With that Mr. B. turned,—they were in the vestibule
- of the theatre—and entered the box-office to speak to someone
- there; immediately he heard the deep voice addressing Jan
- with “You are with Mr. Booth.” “Yes,” responded Jan with real
- negro accent, “I’m wid Mr. Booth.” “In what capacity—are
- you studying?” “Yaas,” returned Jan, unblushingly, “I’se
- studyin’.” “What are you upon now?” “Oh, Richelieu, Hamlet,
- an’ a few of dese yer.” “Ah, I should be pleased to enter into
- correspondence with you while I am abroad. Would you have any
- objections?” “Oh, no, no objection, no objection at all.”
- “Thank you, sir; good-day, sir.” With that they parted and
- Jan came with his mouth stretched wide with laughter. “Massa,
- what is ‘correspond’? I told him I’d correspond, what’d he
- mean, correspond?” Then Jan, convulsed with his joke, roared
- and roared again. They are surely a merry race, but provoking
- enough sometimes. They are capable of real attachments,
- however; this man has been several times dismissed but will
- not go. Booth told everything very dramatically, but I was
- especially struck with his description of a man travelling with
- two shaggy terrier pups in the cars. He had them in a basket
- and hung them up over his head and then composed himself to
- sleep. Waking up half an hour later, he observed a man on the
- opposite side of the car, his eyes starting from his head and
- the very picture of dismay, as if a demon were looking at him.
- The owner of the pups, following the direction of the man’s
- eyes, looked up and saw the two pups had their heads out of
- the basket. He quietly made a sign for them to go back and
- they disappeared. The man’s gaze did not apparently slacken,
- however, but in a moment became still more horrified when the
- pups again looked out. “What’s the matter?” said the owner.
- “What are those?” said the man, pointing with trembling finger;
- “pray excuse me, but I have been on a spree and I thought they
- were demons.” He introduced the subject of the stage and talked
- of points in “Hamlet,” which he had made for the first time,
- but occasionally through accident had omitted. The next day he
- will be sure to be asked by letter or newspaper why he omits
- certain points which would be so excellent to make, _the writer
- thinks_. He has had a life of strange vicissitudes, as almost
- all actors. He referred last night to his frequent travels
- during childhood over the Alleghanies with his father, of long
- nights spent in this kind of travel; and once in Nevada he
- walked fifty miles chiefly through snow. “Why?” said Lilian.
- “Because I was hard up, Lily,” he continued; “I walked it too
- in stage boots which were too tight—it was misery.” ...
-
- They had all gone by half-past ten, but we lay long awake
- thinking over poor Booth and his strange sad fortune. Hamlet,
- indeed!—although Forceythe Willson says, “I have been to see
- Mr. Hamlet play Booth.” Yes, perhaps when he is playing it for
- the 400th time with a bad cold, it may seem so; indeed I found
- it dullish myself, or his part, I mean, the other night; but he
- _did_ play it once—the night of his reappearance in New York.
-
-[Illustration: BOOTH AS HAMLET]
-
- _May 18, 1869._—Last Sunday evening Booth, Aldrich and his wife
- and sister, Dr. Holmes and Amelia and Launt Thompson, Leslie
- and ourselves took tea here together. In the evening came Mr.
- and Mrs. Emerson. We did have a rare and delightful symposium.
- Booth talked little as usual, and the next night went round
- to Aldrich’s and took himself off as he behaves in company!!
- Nevertheless he was glad to see Holmes, though every time Dr.
- H. addressed him across the table he seemed to receive an
- electric shock.
-
-A chance meeting between William Warren and Fields in a lane at the
-seaside Manchester is recorded, with their talk, in the diary as early
-as 1865. Two entries in 1872 have to do with Jefferson, first alone and
-then with Warren. The friendship with Jefferson, begun so long ago, was
-continued until his death.
-
- _Tuesday, March 18, 1872._—Left Boston for a short trip to New
- York. Jefferson the actor, famous throughout the world for
- his impersonation of “Rip Van Winkle,” was on the train and
- finding us out (or J. him), came to our compartment car to
- pass the day. He talked without cessation and without effort.
- He described his sudden disease of the eyes quite bravely
- and simply, from the use of too much whiskey. He said the
- newspapers had said it was the gas, and many other reasons had
- been assigned first and last; but he firmly believed there
- was no other reason than too much whiskey. He had taken the
- habit—when he was somewhat below his ordinary physical and
- mental condition in the evening and wished to rise to the
- proper point and “carry the audience”—of taking a small glass
- of whiskey. This glass was after a time made two, and even
- three or four. Finally he was stricken down by a trouble of
- the eyes which threatened the entire extinction of sight. His
- physician at once suggested that unnatural use of stimulants
- was the cause, of which he himself is now entirely convinced
- and no longer touches anything stronger than claret. He has
- played to a larger variety of audiences probably than almost
- any other great actor. The immense applause he received in
- England, where he played 170 consecutive nights at the Adelphi
- in London, always as “Rip,” has only served to make him
- more modest, it would seem, more desirous to uphold himself
- artistically. He gave us a hint of his taste for fishing and
- described his trout-raising establishment in Jersey; very
- curious and wonderful it was. Nature preserves only one in a
- hundred of the eggs of trout to come to maturity. Mr. Jefferson
- in his pond is able to raise 85 out of 100. There seems no
- delight to him so great as that of sitting beside a stream on a
- sunny day, line in hand.
-
- Talking of the everlasting repetition of “Rip,” he says he
- should be thankful to rest himself with another play, but this
- has been a growth and it would be a daring thing for him to
- attempt anything new with a public who would always compare
- him with himself in this play which is the result of years
- of his best thought and strength. I think myself, if he were
- quite well he would be almost sure to attempt something else.
- He told us several stories very dramatically. He is an odd,
- carelessly dressed little mortal, a cross between Charles Lamb
- and Grimaldi, but we have seldom passed a more delightful day
- of talk than with him. The hours absolutely fled away.
-
- _Wednesday, May 22, 1872._—Mr. Longfellow, Dr. Holmes, and
- Jefferson and Warren, the two first comedians of our time,
- dined here. The hour was three o’clock, to accommodate the
- two professional gentlemen. The hours until three, with the
- exception of two visits (Miss Sara Clarke and Miss Wainwright
- in spite of saying “engaged”), were occupied in making
- preparations for the little feast. I mean the hours after
- breakfast until time to dress. (Of hours before breakfast I
- have now-a-days nothing to say. I am not strong enough to do
- anything early, but country life this summer is to change all
- that.) Mr. Jefferson and Mr. Warren arrived first. Finding
- much to interest them in the pictures of our lower room, they
- lingered there a few moments before coming to the library,
- when we talked of Marney’s pictures (Mr. J. owns some of his
- water-colors) and looked about at others. Soon Longfellow came
- with Jamie. He said he felt like one on a journey. He left home
- early in the morning, had been sight-seeing in Boston all day,
- was to dine and go to the theatre with us afterward.
-
- He asked Mr. Warren why a Mr. Inglis was selling his fine
- library and pictures—a question nobody had been able to solve.
- Mr. Inglis is, however, in some way connected with the stage,
- and Warren told us it was because he had been arrested with
- Mr. Harvey Parker and others and condemned to be thrown in the
- House of Correction, for selling liquor. His money protected
- him from the rigor of the law, but the disgrace remained. His
- children felt it much and he was going to Europe at least for
- a season. We could not help feeling the injustice of this when
- we remembered the myriad liquor shops for the poor all over the
- town, with which no one interferes.
-
- Mr. Jefferson was deeply interested in our pictures of the
- players by Zanaçois. Dr. Holmes came in, talked a little at my
- suggestion about Anne Whitney’s bust of Keats, which he appears
- to know nothing about artistically (I observed the same lack
- of knowledge in Emerson), but he criticised the hair. He said
- he supposed nothing was known about Keats’s hair, so it might
- as well be one way as another. I told him on the contrary I
- owned some of it; whereat I got it out, and he went off in a
- little episode about an essay which he had sometimes thought
- of writing about hair. He has a machine by which the size of a
- hair can be measured and recorded. This he would like to use,
- and make a note of comparison between the hairs of “G. W.” (as
- he laughingly called Washington), Jefferson, Milton, and other
- celebrities of the earth. He thought it might be very curious
- to discover the difference in quality.
-
- We were soon seated at the table (only six all told) where the
- conversation never flagged. Longfellow properly began it by
- saying he thought Mr. Charles Mathews was entirely unjust to
- Mr. Forrest as King Lear. He considered Mr. Forrest’s rendering
- of the part, and he sat through the whole, as fine and close to
- nature. He could not understand Mr. Mathews’s underrating it
- as he did. Of course the other two gentlemen could say nothing
- more than the difficulty Mr. Mathews from his nature would
- have in estimating at its proper worth anything Mr. Forrest
- might do, their idea of Art being so dissimilar. Here arose the
- question if one actor was a good judge of another. Jefferson
- said he sometimes thought actors very bad judges—indeed he
- preferred to be judged by an audience inspired by feeling
- rather than by one intellectually critical.
-
- Jefferson has a clear blue eye, very fine and bright and sweet.
- Longfellow thinks his mouth a very weak one, and certainly his
- face is not impressive. Warren appears a man of finer intellect
- and more wit. He had many witty things to say and his little
- tales were always dramatically given. Dr. Holmes could not seem
- to recover from the idea that Jefferson had made a fortune out
- of one play and that he _never_ played but one. “I hear, Mr.
- Jefferson,” he said, when he first came in, “that you have been
- playing the same play ever since you came here.” (He has been
- playing the same for a dozen years, I believe, nearly—and has
- been here _three weeks_!) Jefferson could hardly help laughing
- as he assured him that for the space of three weeks he had
- given the same every night. Dr. Holmes had a way at the table
- of talking of “you actors,” “you gentlemen of the stage,” until
- I saw Longfellow was quite disturbed at the unsympathetic
- unmannerliness of it, in appearance, and tried to talk more
- than ever in a different strain.
-
- After I left the table, which I did because I thought they
- might like to smoke, Jamie sent for Parsons’s poems and read
- them some of the finest. Of course the talk was wittier and
- quicker as the time came to separate, but I cannot report
- upon it. The impression the two actors left upon me, however,
- was rather that of men who enjoyed coming up to the surface
- to breathe a natural air seldom vouchsafed to them than of
- men sparring with their wits—they are affectionate, gentle,
- subdued gentlemen and a noble contrast to the self-opinionated
- ignorance which we often meet in society. Dr. Holmes was,
- however, the wit of the occasion, as he always is, and
- everybody richly enjoyed his sallies. They stayed until the
- last moment—indeed I do not see how they got to their two
- theatres in time to dress. It must have been, as they say of
- eggs, a “hard scrabble.” _We_ went afterward—we four—to see a
- new actor, Raymond, play “Colleen Bawn” at the Globe—pretty
- play, though very touching and melodramatic, by Boucicault.
- I must confess to dislike such plays where your feelings are
- wrought to the highest pitch for nothing.
-
-[Illustration: JEFFERSON IN THE BETROTHAL SCENE OF “RIP VAN WINKLE”]
-
-The name of Fechter is familiar to the middle-aged through the memory
-of fathers, to the young through that of grandfathers. Readers of these
-pages will recall that Dickens, soon after reaching America in 1867,
-spoke of him in terms which caused Mrs. Fields to look forward with
-confidence to a new friendship. His coming to America was specifically
-heralded by an article, “On Mr. Fechter’s Acting,” contributed by Dickens
-to the “Atlantic” for August, 1869. When Fechter was in Boston, warmly
-received as Dickens’s friend, he often appears in the journals of Mrs.
-Fields, in conjunction with others.
-
- _Friday, February 25, 1870._—Mr. Fechter came to lunch with Mr.
- Longfellow, Mr. Appleton, Mr. and Mrs. Dorr. He talked freely
- about his Hamlet, so different from all other impersonations.
- His audience here he finds wonderfully good, better than any
- other; fine points which have never been applauded before
- bring out a round of applause. On the whole he appears to
- enjoy new hearers—does not understand the constant comparison
- between himself and Booth. They are already great friends.
- Booth was in the house the last night of his performance there;
- afterward he did not come to speak to him, and Fechter felt it;
- but a letter came yesterday saying he was so observed that he
- slipped away as soon as possible, and could not come on Sunday
- because visitors prevented him. Better late than never; it was
- pleasant to Fechter to hear from Booth—with one exception:
- he enclosed a notice from some newspaper, cutting up himself
- horribly and praising Fechter. “Ah! that won’t do; I shall send
- it back to him and tell him why. We are totally unlike in our
- Hamlets, and neither should be praised at the other’s expense.”
-
- Mr. Fechter described minutely Mr. Dickens’s attack of
- paralysis last year, and, the year before, his prompt
- appearance in the box of the theatre at the last performance of
- “No Thoroughfare,” which he said he should do; but as Fechter
- had not heard of his return from America, it was a great shock.
- “If it had been ‘Hamlet,’ or any difficult play, I could not
- have gone on! He should not have done such a thing.” He told us
- a strange touching story of M’lle Mars, during her last years.
- She came upon the stage one night to give one of the youthful
- parts in which she had once been so famous. When she appeared,
- some heartless wretch threw her a wreath of immortelles, as if
- for her grave. She was so shocked that the drops stood on her
- brow, the rouge fell from her cheeks, and she stood motionless
- before the audience, a picture of age and misery. She could not
- continue her part.
-
-[Illustration: A NAST CARTOON OF DICKENS AND FECHTER]
-
- He spoke with intense enthusiasm of Frédérick Lemaître, much
- as I have heard Mr. Dickens do. “The second-class actors were
- always arguing with him (only second-class people argue) and
- saying, ‘Why do you wish me to stand here, Frédérick?’ ‘I don’t
- know,’ he would say, ‘only do it.’”
-
- Mr. Appleton was deeply interested in the fact that Shakespeare
- proved himself such a believer in ghosts, as “Hamlet” shows,
- and would like to push the subject farther, Mr. Fechter
- evidently finding much to say on this topic also. Mr.
- Longfellow was interested to ask about the Dumas, _père et
- fils_. Mr. Fechter has known them well and has many queer
- stories to tell of their relation to each other. _Le fils_
- calls _mon père_, “my youngest child born many years ago,” and
- the father usually introduces the son as M. Dumas, _mon père_.
- The motto on Fechter’s note paper is very curious and a type
- of the man—“_Faiblesse vaut vice_.” Mr. Longfellow spoke again
- of Mr. Dickens’s restlessness, of his terrible sadness. “Yes,
- yes,” said Fechter, “all his fame goes for nothing.” ...
-
- Jamie is so weak that he went to sleep almost as soon as they
- were gone. God knows what it all means; I do not.
-
- It is odd that Fechter’s eyes should be brown after all. They
- look so light in the play. He is a round little man, naturally
- friendly, spontaneous. We do not know what his life has been,
- and we will not ask; that does not rest with us; but he is a
- very fine artist. His imitation of Mr. Dickens, as he sat on
- the lawn watching him at work, or as he joined him coming from
- his desk at lunchtime with tears on his cheek and a smile on
- his mouth, was very close to the life and delightful.
-
- Mr. Longfellow did not talk much, not as much as the last time
- he was here, but he was lovely and kind.[29] He brought a
- coin of the French Republic which had been touched by French
- wit, _Liberté_ x (point), _Egalité_ x (point), _Fraternité_ x
- (point). And more to the same effect, without altering the coin.
-
- Appleton has just bought a new Troyon, which he says he shall
- lend me for a week.
-
-At the end of the following August there is a record of a talk with
-Fechter on the boat from Boston to Nahant, where he and the Fieldses
-dined with Longfellow. Dickens had died in the June just past, and
-Fechter had much to say of him and his family life. “Day by day,” wrote
-Mrs. Fields, “I am grateful to think of him at rest.” The little party at
-Nahant is described.
-
- We found dear Longfellow looking through a glass to espy our
- approach, and all his dear little girls and Ernest and his wife
- and Appleton, who whisked me away from the dinner-table to his
- studio where he had some really good sketches. The conversation
- at table was half French, Longfellow and Appleton both finding
- it agreeable to recall the foreign scenes by the foreign
- tongue. But except a queer imitation of John Forster, by
- Fechter, I do not remember any quotable talk. F. said Forster
- always looked at everybody as if regarding their qualifications
- for a lunatic asylum (he is commissioner of lunacy), saying to
- himself, “Well, I’ll let you off _today_, but tomorrow you must
- certainly go and be shut up.” He describes Forster’s present
- state of health as something very precarious and wretched.
-
- _November 14, 1870._—Monday night went to see Fechter in
- “Claude Melnotte.” Longfellow and his daughter Edith sat in
- the box adjoining ours. It was the stage box where they were
- sheltered from observation; ours was the box next it, to be
- sure, but accessible to all eyes. During the curtain Longfellow
- came into our box; Mrs. Holmes and Mrs. Andrew were with me,
- both plain ladies dressed in mourning. His advent caused a
- little rustle of curiosity to ripple over the house. Longfellow
- was never looking finer than he is today. His white hair and
- deep blue eyes and kind face make his presence a benediction
- wherever he goes—of such men one cannot help feeling what
- Dr. Putnam so well expressed last Sunday in speaking of the
- presence of our Lord at a feast. “He rewarded the hospitality
- of his friends by his presence.”
-
- Longfellow brought an illegible scrawl in his hand which
- Parsons had written from London to Lunt. He told me also of
- having lately received a photograph from Virginia of a young
- woman, and written under it were the words, “What fault can be
- found with this?” He said he thought of replying, “The fault of
- too great youth.” It certainly could not be agreeable to him
- to sit in the eye of the audience as he did; but he was very
- talkative and pleasant, expressed his disappointment at not
- having us at his Nilsson dinner, but his family were too many
- for him; said how he liked her for her frankness; told me of
- the old impressario Garrett, the Jew, coming without invitation
- and certainly without being wanted (as it sent “his children
- upstairs to dine”); and then, as the play was about to begin,
- he withdrew. He was much amused and disgusted by the platitudes
- of the play. Returned to his own box, Jamie said he laughed
- immoderately over the absurdities of it as it continued. He
- tooted as the instruments tooted and spouted as the second-rate
- actors spouted, all of which was highly amusing to Edith, who
- was weeping over the unhappy lovers, utterly absorbed in the
- play. Mrs. Holmes and Mrs. Andrew, too, were full of tears, and
- I found it no use attempting to say anything more during the
- evening.
-
- Fechter was indeed marvellous. He raised the play into
- something human, something exquisite whenever he was upon the
- stage. His terrible earnestness sweeps the audience utterly
- away. But he is not the player for the million.
-
- _Sunday evening, December 11, 1870._—Went to Mr. Bartol’s and
- met Mr. Collyer. He was pleased to hear what Fechter said of
- him Saturday night (by the by we met Fechter at Mrs. Dorr’s
- dinner on Saturday), that he singled him out, found him a
- capital audience, and played to him. It was a fine house on
- Saturday and Fechter played “Don Cæsar.” It was never played
- better. Curtis was there, and fine company. Fechter was
- graceful and saucy too in talk at dinner—just right for the
- occasion.
-
- _Monday, December 19._—I have just returned from seeing Fechter
- in “Ruy Blas.” The public has just received the news that he
- is to leave the Globe Theatre and Boston in four weeks. The
- result was an enormous house, and the most fashionable house I
- have seen this season. He played with great fire and ease, but
- he has a wretched cold and his pronunciation was so thick and
- French (as it is apt to be when he is excited) that I could
- often hardly catch a word. But his audience was determined to
- be pleased and they caught and applauded all his good points.
- I saw but one dissenting spirit, that was a spoiled queen of
- fashion just returned from Europe, who saw nobody and nothing
- but herself....
-
- _Saturday, January 7, 1871_.—Dined at Mr. Longfellow’s with
- Mr. Fechter. The poet welcomed us with a cordiality peculiar
- to himself and his children, with a simple glad-to-see written
- over their faces which is worth a world of talk. We had a
- merry table-talk although Fechter was laboring under the
- unnatural excitement of his position in having lost his season
- at the Globe, broken with the proprietor Cheney who was his
- friend, and finding himself without an engagement for the time.
- Also, so mischance held the day, Miss Leclercq, his only fit
- support, injured herself in the afternoon and their superb
- audience went away disappointed. However, the dinner went off
- beautifully, as it always must with Longfellow at the helm.
- There was some talk of poetry and the drama and J. amused
- them too with anecdotes. Then we adjourned to the room of
- Charles the East-India man, where we saw many curiosities and
- had a very pleasant hour before leaving. Passing through the
- dressing-room of our dear Longfellow, I was struck with seeing
- how like the house of a German student it was—a Goethean aspect
- of simplicity and largeness everywhere—books too are put on all
- the walls. It is surely a most attractive house.
-
- _January 13, 1871._—Today Jamie lunched with Appleton. We
- passed the evening at Mrs. Quincy’s. It is the great benefit to
- Fechter, but in consequence of the tickets being sold unjustly
- at auction, we shall not go. Unhappily there are rumors about
- town that Fechter is to be insulted in the theatre. I wish I
- could get word to him. I shall wait until J. gets home and then
- ask him to drive up to put F. on his guard.
-
- _January 23._—It proved an unnecessary alarm! The evening went
- off well enough but unenthusiastically, and at last Fechter
- gave all the money to the poor!
-
-When Mrs. Fields first met that representative of the once alluring art
-of “elocution,” James E. Murdoch, he was already a veteran who had twice,
-at an interval of nearly twenty years, retired from the stage. Two notes
-about him recall his robust personality.
-
- _January 13, 1867._—I never met James E. Murdoch, the actor,
- to hear any talk until Sunday night. The knowledge of his
- patriotism, of his son who died in the war, and of the weary
- miles the father had travelled to comfort the soldiers by
- reading to them, and afterwards the large sums of money he
- had given to the country’s cause gathered up laboriously
- night by night by public “readings”—all this I had known. Of
- course no introduction could have been better, yet I liked
- the man even more than I had fancied was possible. He was so
- modest and talked in such a free generous way, purely for the
- entertainment of others, I fancied, because we saw he had a
- severe cold on his chest. The way too in which he recited
- “Sheridan’s Ride” and anything else for the children which he
- thought they would like was quite beautiful to see in a man
- of his years, who must have had quite enough of that kind of
- thing to do. His hobby is elocution. He is about to establish
- a school or college or something of that description, whatever
- its honorable title will be, at the West[30] (the money having
- been granted in part by legislature, the other half to be
- made by his own public efforts) for the purpose of educating
- speakers and teaching men and women how to read. He has known
- Grant and Sheridan well, lived in camp with them at the same
- mess-table, and has the highest opinion of the patriotism and
- probity of both of them. There is no mistake about one thing.
- Mr. Murdoch made himself a power during the war, and now that
- is over does not cease to work, nor does he allow himself to
- presume upon the laurels he has won nor to brag of his own work.
-
- _Saturday morning, November 13, 1875._—After a western
- journey, left for home. Sunday met James E. Murdoch in the
- cars at Springfield. It was about six o’clock A.M., but he was
- bound for Newton. He came in therefore with us, and talked
- delightfully until we parted. He is an old man but as full of
- nerve, vigor, and ripened intellect as anyone whom I have seen.
- His talk of the stage, of his disgust for Macready’s book, his
- disgust at the manner in which Forrest treated his wife, his
- account of his own experiences, when he was glad to play for
- $35 a week, were deeply interesting. The better side of Forrest
- he understood and appreciated thoroughly.
-
-[Illustration: JAMES E. MURDOCH AND WILLIAM WARREN]
-
-The hospitalities of Charles Street were by no means confined to the men
-of the theatrical and kindred professions. In later years Miss Ellen
-Terry, Lady Gregory, and those other ladies associated with the stage who
-so surely found their way to Mrs. Fields’s door when they visited Boston,
-were but carrying on the traditions of the earlier decades. As the
-visitors came and went, the diary in the sixties and seventies recorded
-their exits and their entrances. A few passages are typical of many.
-
-A portion of the notes relating to Charlotte Cushman will be the better
-understood for a preliminary remark upon a Boston event of huge local
-moment in the autumn of 1863. This was the dedication of the Great Organ,
-that wonder of the age, in Music Hall. The first public performance
-on the organ, at the ceremonies on the evening of November 2, were
-preceded by Charlotte Cushman’s reading of a dedicatory ode, contributed,
-according to the “Advertiser” of the next day, by an “anonymous lady of
-this city.” The secret of Mrs. Fields’s authorship of this poem, which
-the “Advertiser” found somewhat too long in spite of its merits, must
-have been shared by some of her friends, though it was temporarily kept
-from the public.
-
- _Sunday, September 20, 1863._—In the evening Charlotte Cushman
- and her niece, Dr. Dewey and Miss McGregor, Miss Mears and Mr.
- W. R. Emerson, passed a few hours with us. Charlotte, always
- of athletic but prejudiced mind, talked busily of people and
- events. She is a Seward-ite in politics and called Dr. Howe
- and Judge Conway “ass-sy” because they said Charles Sumner
- had prevented thus far a war with England. She has made money
- during the war, but believes apparently not at all in the
- patriotism of the people. She is to give one performance for
- “the Sanitary” in each of the four northern seacoast cities,
- also for fun and fame. She can’t endure to give up the stage.
- She is a woman of effects. She lives for effect, and yet doing
- always good things and possessed of most admirable qualities.
- She has warm friends. Mrs. Carlyle is extremely fond of her,
- gives her presents and says flattering things to her. “Cleverer
- than her husband,” says Miss Cushman. I put this quietly into
- my German pipe and puff peacefully.
-
- _Saturday Evening, September 26, 1863._—Charlotte Cushman
- played Lady Macbeth for the benefit of the Sanitary Commission
- to a large audience. Her reading of the letter when she first
- appears is one of her finest points. She moves her feet
- execrably and succeeds in developing all the devilish nature
- in the part, but discovers no beauty. Yet it is delightful
- to hear the wondrous poetry of the play intelligently and
- clearly rendered. It would be impossible to say this of the
- man who played Macbeth, who talked of “encarnardine,” and
- “heat-oppre_st_ brain,” for “oppressèd,” besides innumerable
- other faults and failures, which he mouthed too much for me
- to discover. Charlotte in the sleeping scene was fine—that
- deep-drawn breath of sleep is thrilling....
-
- There has been an ode written to be spoken at the organ
- opening. No one is to know who wrote it. Miss Cushman will
- speak it if they are speedy enough in their finishing. This
- is of interest to many. I trust they will be ready for Miss
- Cushman.
-
-[Illustration: FROM A CRAYON PORTRAIT OF CHARLOTTE CUSHMAN]
-
- _Monday, November 2, 1863._—Miss Dodge and Una Hawthorne
- came to dine. At 7 o’clock we all started for the Music Hall.
- Miss Cushman read my ode in a most perfect manner. She was
- very nervous about it and skipped something, but what she did
- read was perfect. Her dress and manner too were dignified and
- beautiful. It was a night never to be forgotten. Afterward we
- had a little supper. Dr. and Mrs. Holmes, Mr. Ogden of New
- York, Dr. Upham[31] and Judge Putnam and Mrs. Howe were added
- to our other guests. Charlotte Cushman left early the next day
- and Gail Hamilton and I sat down and took a long delicious
- draught of talk.
-
- _April 27, 1871._—Charlotte Cushman came to see us yesterday.
- Her full brain was brimming over, and her rich sympathetic
- voice is ringing now in my ears. She does not overestimate
- herself, that woman, which is part of her greatness, for the
- word _does_ apply to her in a certain way because she grows
- nearer to it every day. J. de Maistre refused the epithet
- “grand” to Napoleon because he lacked more stature—but this
- hand-to-hand fight with death over herself (loving life clearly
- as she does) has strengthened her hold upon her affection for
- life, insensibly. She grows daily wiser and nobler.
-
- _November 13, 1871._—We all went together to Charlotte
- Cushman’s début in Queen Katherine at the Globe Theatre. A
- house filled with her friends and a noble piece of acting. She
- spoke to every woman’s heart there; by this I felt the high art
- and the noble sympathetic nature far above art which was in
- the woman and radiates from her. Much of the play beside was
- poor, but Mrs. Hunt was very amusing and we laughed and laughed
- at her sallies until I was quite ashamed. J. went behind the
- scenes and talked with C. C. She was in first-rate condition.
-
-For other contacts with the stage, three brief passages may speak:—
-
- _November 8, 1866._—Went to see Ristori’s “Pia dei Tolomei” in
- the evening. It was pure and beautiful. Being R.’s benefit,
- she made a short speech, and exquisitely simple as it was, her
- fine voice and the slight difficulty of enunciating the English
- words made her speech one of the most touching features of the
- time.
-
- _Saturday._—Morning at home. Went to see Ristori for the last
- time, as Elizabeth, perhaps her finest characterization.
- Longfellow and Whittier had both promised to go with us, but
- the courage of both failed at the last moment. The house was
- crowded. Mr. Grau asked Mr. Fields to go and speak with the
- great actress, but he excused himself.
-
- Whittier had never been inside of a theatre and could not quite
- feel like breaking the bonds now—besides he said it would cost
- him many nights of sleep. Longfellow does not face high tragedy
- before a crowd.
-
-[Illustration: RISTORI AND FANNY KEMBLE
-
-_The photograph of Mrs. Kemble was taken in Philadelphia in 1863_]
-
- _January 16, 1868._—Fanny Kemble read “The Merchant of Venice”
- in Boston last night—the old way of losing her breath when she
- appeared, as if totally overcome by the audience. We could
- not doubt that she felt her return deeply and sincerely,
- but—however, the feeling was undoubtedly real if short-lived,
- and we will give her credit for it. Her voice is sadly faded
- since the brilliant readings of ten years ago; she has had much
- sorrow since then and shows the marks of it. It is interesting
- to compare her work with Mr. Dickens’s; he is so much the
- greater artist! You can never mistake one of his characters for
- another, nor lose a syllable of his perfectly enunciated words.
- She speaks much more slowly usually, and there is a grand
- intonation as the verses sway from her lips, but one cannot
- be sure always if Jessica or Nerissa be speaking, Antonio or
- Bassanio. Her face is marvellous in tender passages, a serenity
- falls upon it born of immortal youth. It is beautiful enough
- for tears. She enjoys the wit too herself thoroughly, and
- brought out Launcelot Gobbo with great unction. An enormous and
- enthusiastic audience gave her hearty welcome. Longfellow could
- not come. His wife in the old days enjoyed this play too well
- when they used to go together for him to trust himself to hear
- it again.
-
- _Monday, May 18, 1868._—Raining like all possessed again
- today. I was to have done my gardening today but there is
- no chance yet. Walked over to Roxbury with J. yesterday and
- found everything gay with the coming loveliness. It has
- scarcely come, however. Jamie was much entertained by tales
- Mrs. Kemble’s agent told him of that lady: how she watched an
- Irish scrubbing woman dawdle over her work, who was paid by
- the hour, and finally called her to her (she was sitting at
- her own reading-desk in the hall), and said in her stately
- fashion, “I fear, madam, if you exert yourself so much over
- your work you will make yourself ill. Your health is seriously
- endangered by your severe efforts.” The woman, not seeing
- the sarcasm, replied in the strongest possible brogue to the
- effect that nothing short of the direst necessity would compel
- such dreadful labor. Whereat Mrs. Kemble, with a look not to
- be reproduced, and a wink to Mr. Pugh, withdrew. She read
- “Midsummer Night’s Dream” on Saturday P.M. We went, but found
- the place entirely without air and left after the first part.
- She did not begin with much spirit, but her voice was exquisite
- and her fun also, and her dress was an æsthetic pleasure, as a
- lady’s dress should always be, but alas! so seldom is, in this
- country.
-
- _Wednesday, November 9, 1870._—We have had a reception today
- for Miss Nilsson. Longfellow and Henry Ward Beecher were
- here, beside Perabo and many excellent or talented people,
- nearly sixty in all. It was a curious fact to give out seventy
- invitations and have sixty (or nearly that) present.
-
- Miss Nilsson, Mrs. Richardson (her attendant), Alice
- Longfellow, and ourselves sat down to lunch afterward, when she
- sang snatches of her loveliest songs and talked and laughed and
- was as graceful and merry and sweet as ever a beautiful woman
- knows how to be. She is now twenty-seven years old. Her light
- hair, deep blue eyes, full glorious eyes, are of the Northern
- type, but her broad intellectual brow, her beautiful teeth,
- and strong character, belong only to the type of genius and
- beauty. She is not only brave but almost imperious, I fancy,
- at times; a manner quite necessary, I say, to protect her from
- vulgar animosity and audacity. We heard her last night sing
- “Auld Robin Gray” not only with exquisite feeling, but with
- a pronunciation of the Scottish dialect that appeared to us
- very remarkable. When we spoke to her of it she said, “Yes,
- but there is much like that too in the Swedish dialect. When I
- first came up a peasant to Stockholm to learn to sing, I had
- the dialect very bad indeed, and it was a long time before I
- lost it. Then I went to school in France, and now my accent
- and dialect are French. When I went back home and talked with
- the French dialect, they said to me, ‘Now Christine, don’t be
- absurd,’ but I could not help it. I catch everything. I have
- never studied English in my life. I am learning American fast.
- I have learned ‘I guess,’ and I shall soon say ‘I reckon’ by
- the time I come back from the West.”
-
- Vieuxtemps, the violinist, she appreciates and enjoys highly
- as an artist. Of Ole Bull she says, “He is a charlatan. Ah,
- you will excuse me, but it is true.” Of Viardot-Garcia she has
- the highest admiration. Nothing ever gave her higher delight
- than Viardot’s compliment after hearing her “Mignon.” It was
- uncalled for, unexpected, and from the heart. She rehearsed
- what we recall so well, Viardot’s plain face, poor figure—and
- great genius triumphant over all. Well, we hear poor Viardot
- has lost her fortune by this sad French war.
-
- I have set down nothing which can recall the strong sweet
- beauty of Nilsson. She is a power to command success—fine and
- strong and sweet. Her face glowed and responded and originated
- in a swift yet gentle way, as one person after another was
- presented, that was a study and a lesson. She neither looked
- nor seemed tired until the presentation was over, when she said
- she was hungry. “We have had no breakfast yet, nothing to eat
- all day; ah, I shall know again what it means when Mrs. Fields
- asks me to lunch at one o’clock!” with an arch look at me. I
- was extremely penitent and hurried the lunch, but the people
- could not go out of the dining-room. However, all was cleaned
- at last and we had a quiet cosy talk and sit-down, which was
- delightful.
-
- On Saturday she sang from “Hamlet,” the mad scene of Ophelia.
- As usual, her dress and whole appearance were of the most
- refined and perfect beauty, and her singing we appreciated even
- more deeply than ever. She has not the remote _exalté_ nature
- of highest genius, but she is the great singer of this new
- time, and her realism is in marked sympathy with her period.
-
-[Illustration: CHRISTINE NILSSON AS OPHELIA]
-
-It has already been suggested that, when Thomas Bailey Aldrich made his
-migration to Boston as editor of “Every Saturday,” he brought into the
-circle of the Fieldses many fresh breezes from the outer world. In the
-diary of Mrs. Fields there are frequent notes revealing a friendship
-which lasted, indeed, long after the diary ceased, and up to the end of
-Aldrich’s life, in 1907. Two entries—the first relating to the meteoric
-author of “The Diamond Lens,” regarded in its day as a bright portent
-in the literary heavens, the second to the Aldriches themselves at the
-country place with the name which Aldrich embalmed in his excellent
-title, “From Ponkapog to Pesth”—warrant conversion from manuscript into
-print.
-
- _November 9, 1865._—Aldrich told us the story of Fitz-James
- O’Brien, the able author of “The Diamond Lens.” He was a
- handsome fellow, and began his career by running away with
- the wife of an English officer. The officer was in India, and
- Fitz-James and the guilty woman had fled to one of the seaports
- on the south of England in order to take passage for America,
- when the arrival of the woman’s husband was announced to them
- and O’Brien fled. He concealed himself on board a ship bound
- for New York. There he ran a career of dissipation, landing
- with only sixty dollars. He went to a first-rate hotel, ordered
- wines, and left a large bill behind when the time came to run
- away. Then he wrote for Harpers, and one publisher and another,
- writing little and over-drawing funds on a large scale. He
- came and lived six weeks upon Aldrich in his uncle’s house one
- summer when the family were away. One day he tried to borrow
- money of Harpers, and being refused he went into the bindery
- department, borrowed a board, printed on it, “I am starving,”
- bored holes through the ends, put in a string, hung it round
- his neck, allowed his fawn-colored gloves to depend over each
- end, and stood in the doorway where the firm should see him
- when they went to dinner. A great laugh and more money was
- the result of this escapade. Finally, when the war broke out,
- he enlisted, and this was the last A. heard of him for some
- time; but, being himself called to take a position on General
- Lander’s staff, he was on his way to Richmond and had reached
- Petersburg, when someone told him Fitz-James O’Brien had been
- shot dead. Then he went to the hospital and saw him lying there
- dead.
-
- Shortly after this, when Bayard Taylor and his wife were dining
- in a hotel restaurant at Dover, I believe,—it was one of the
- south of England towns,—they saw themselves closely observed by
- a lady and gentleman sitting near them. Finally the gentleman
- arose and came to speak to Taylor, said he observed they were
- Americans, and asked if he had ever heard of F. J. O’Brien.
- “Oh, yes,” said Taylor, “I knew him very well. He was killed
- in our war.” Then the lady burst into tears and the gentleman
- said, “She is his mother!”
-
- I forgot to say in the course of the story that he borrowed
- once sixty-five dollars for which A. became responsible,
- and when it was not paid he sent a letter to O’B. saying he
- must pay it. In return O’Brien sent him a challenge for a
- duel, which A. accepted, in the meantime discovering that an
- honorable fight could not be between a debtor and a creditor.
- However, when the time appointed arrived, O’Brien had
- absconded. We could not repress a smile at the idea of A.’s
- _fighting_, for he is a painfully small gentleman.
-
- _May 31, 1876._—Passed the day with the Aldriches at Ponkapog.
- Aldrich maintained at dinner that the horse railroad injured
- Charles Street. His wife and J. T. F. took the opposite ground.
- Finally J. said, “Well, the Philadelphians don’t agree with
- you; they have learned the value of horse railroads in their
- streets.” “Oh, that’s because they are such Christians,” said
- A. “They know whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth.”
-
- He is a queer, witty creature. When the railroad dropped us
- at Green Lodge station, a tiny place surrounded by wild green
- woods and bog, we found him sitting on a corner of the platform
- where he said he had been “listening to the bullfrog tune
- his violin. He had been twanging at one string a long time!”
- Aldrich was in an ecstasy of delight, and in truth it was a day
- to put the most untuned spirit into tune. In the afternoon we
- floated on the beautiful pond. The whole day gave us a series
- of pictures—only thirteen miles from town, yet the beechwoods
- can be no more retired. Mr. Pierce owns 500 acres, and it
- must be a pleasure to him, while he is away in Washington, to
- feel that someone is using and enjoying his beautiful domain;
- and how could it be half so well used and enjoyed as by the
- family of a struggling literary man! The house they live in,
- which was going to decay, may really be considered a creation
- of Lilian’s. Altogether she is very clever and Aldrich most
- fortunate and our Washington senator is doubtless most content
- to think of the enjoyment of others in his domain.
-
-Still more exotic a figure in Boston than Aldrich was William Morris
-Hunt—in spite of his temporary association with Harvard College and
-his Boston marriage. Both he and his wife are constantly to be met in
-the pages of Mrs. Fields’s journals, from which they emerged with some
-frequency into her published “Biographical Notes,” even as they have
-reappeared, with others, on earlier pages of this book.
-
-In other places than Charles Street, Fields and Hunt were often meeting.
-One brief record of an encounter, at the end of a Saturday Club meeting,
-should surely be preserved, for all that it suggests of Hunt in amused
-rebellion against his surroundings.
-
- _Sunday, August 26, 1874._—Hunt came to Jamie when the
- afternoon was nearly ended and asked him to go up to his
- studio. As they went along, he said, “I’ve made a poem! First
- time I ever wrote anything in my life. ’Tisn’t long, only four
- lines, but I’ve got it written down.” Whereat then and there he
- pulled out his pocketbook and read:
-
- “Boston is a hilly place;
- People all are brothers-in-law.
- If you or I want something done
- They treat us then like mothers-in-law.
-
- “This goes to the tune of Yankee Doodle,” Whereat he sang
- it out on the public highway. He looked very handsome, was
- beautifully dressed in brown velvet with a gold chain about
- his neck, but swore like a trooper and was in one of his most
- lawless moods.
-
- He gave J. for me a photograph of a marvellous picture which
- he calls his Persian Sybil, Anahita. I see his wife in it as
- in so many of his best works. “I don’t mean to do any more
- portraits,” he said. “When I remember how I have wasted time on
- an eyebrow because somebody’s 14th cousin thought it ought to
- turn up a little more—it makes me mad!”
-
-[Illustration: _Facsimile letter from Hunt to Fields_]
-
-When the English painter, Lowes Dickinson, the father of G. Lowes
-Dickinson, was visiting the Fieldses in Boston, a photograph of Hunt’s
-portrait of Chief Justice Lemuel Shaw so impressed him that he asked to
-be taken to the painter’s studio. In Miss Helen M. Knowlton’s “Art Life
-of William Morris Hunt” this circumstance is related, together with its
-sequel, which was the publication of Hunt’s “Talks on Art” from notes
-made by Miss Knowlton herself. It is a surmise but slightly hazardous
-that a characteristic note found among the Fields papers was written
-apropos of Dickinson’s visit to Hunt: “Send ’em along—I mean Painters,”
-he wrote to Fields. “I have had a delightful day with your friend—and I
-know he is a painter—why? because he likes what I do well and _hates_
-what I do that ain’t worth....”
-
-It has been seen that, as early as November, 1868, James Parton suggested
-that “a writer named Mark Twain” be engaged to contribute to the
-“Atlantic.”[32] In October, 1868, “F. Bret Harte” wrote to the editor
-of the “Atlantic” from San Francisco: “As the author of ‘The Luck of
-Roaring Camp,’ I have to thank you for an invitation to contribute to
-the ‘Atlantic Monthly,’ but as editor of ‘The Overland,’ my duties
-claim most of my spare time outside of the Government office in which
-I am employed.... But I am glad of this opportunity to thank someone
-connected with the ‘Atlantic’ for its very gracious good-will toward
-me and my writings, particularly the book which G. W. Carleton of New
-York malformed in its birth. There was an extra kindness in your taking
-the deformed brat by the hand, and trying to recognize some traces of a
-parent so far away.”
-
-It was in the discharge of his work as editor of the “Atlantic” that
-Fields, hospitable to practitioners of all the arts, entered especially
-into relations with writers whose paths might not otherwise have crossed
-his, and his wife’s. Of all the young Lochinvars of the pen who came
-out of the West while Mrs. Fields was keeping her diary, Bret Harte and
-Mark Twain were the daring and dauntless gallants who most captured the
-imagination and have longest held it. To each of them Mrs. Fields devoted
-a number of pages in her diary. We shall see first what she had to say
-about Bret Harte.
-
- _Friday, March 10, 1871._—Too many days full of interest have
- passed unrecorded. Chiefly I should record what I can recall
- of Francis Bret Harte, who has made his first visit to the
- East just now, since he went to San Francisco in his early
- youth. He is now apparently about 35 years old. His mind is
- full of the grand landscape of the West, and filled also with
- sympathetic interest in the half-developed natives who are
- to be seen there, nearer to the surface than in our Eastern
- cities. He told me of a gambler who had a friend lying dead in
- the upper room of a gambling house. The man went out to see
- about having services performed. “Better have it at the grave,”
- said the parson to whom he applied. Jim shook his head as if
- he feared the proper honors would not be paid his friend. The
- other then suggested they should find the minister and leave
- it to him. “Well,” said Jim, “yes, I wish you’d do just that,
- for I ain’t much of a funeral ‘sharp’ myself.” He told me also,
- as a sign of the wonderful recklessness which had pervaded San
- Francisco, that at one time there was a glut of tobacco in the
- market and, a block of houses going up at the same period, _the
- foundations of those houses were laid of boxes of tobacco_.
- Bret Harte, as the world calls him, is natural, warm-hearted,
- with a keen relish for fun, disposed to give just value to the
- strong language of the West, which he is by no means inclined
- to dispense with; at ease in every society, quick of sense
- and sight. Jamie, who saw him more than I, finds him lovable
- above all. We liked his wife too,—not handsome but with good
- honest sense, appreciative of him,—and two children. She is
- said to sing well, but poor woman! the fatigues of that most
- distressing journey across the continent, the fêtes, the heat
- (for the weather is unusually warm), have been almost too much
- for her and she is not certainly at her best. They dined and
- took tea here last Friday.
-
-[Illustration: _Facsimile page from an early letter of Bret Harte’s_]
-
- _Tuesday, September 5, 1871._—J. went to Boston. I wrote in the
- pastures and walked all the morning. Coming home, after dinner,
- came a telegram for me to meet J. and Bret Harte at Beverly
- station with the pony carriage. I drove hard to catch the
- train, but arrived in season, glad to take up the two good boys
- and show them Beverly shore. Stopped at Mrs. Cabot’s returning
- to see Mrs. ——, etc. They were all glad to have a glimpse of
- Bret Harte. The talk turned a little upon Hawthorne, and I was
- much amused to hear Mrs. —— say, drawing herself up, “Yes, he
- was born in Salem, but we never knew anything about him.” (The
- truth was, Mrs. —— was the last person to appreciate him.) ...
- Fortunately Miss Howes was present, whose father was one of
- Hawthorne’s best friends; so matters were made clear there. We
- left soon and came on to Manchester, where, after showing him
- the shore, we sat and talked during the evening.
-
- Mr. Harte had much to say of the beautiful flowers of
- California, roses being in bloom about his own house there
- every month in the year. He found the cloudless skies and
- continued drought of California very hard to bear. For the
- first time in my life I considered how terrible perpetual
- cloudlessness would be! He thinks there is no beauty in the
- mountains of California, hard, bare, snowless peaks. Neither
- are there trees, nor any green grass.
-
- He is delighted with the fragrant lawns of Newport and has, I
- believe, put into verse a delightful ghost story which he told
- us.[33] He has taken a house of some antiquity in Newport,
- connected with which is the story of a lady who formerly lived
- there and who was very fond of the odor of mignonette. The
- flower was always growing in her house, and after her death,
- at two o’clock every night, a strong odor has always been
- perceived passing through the house as if wafted along by the
- garments of a woman. One night at the appointed hour, but
- entirely unconnected in his thought with the story Mr. Harte
- had long ago heard, he was arrested in his work by a strong
- perfume of mignonette which appeared to sweep by him. He looked
- about, thinking his wife might have placed a vase of flowers
- in the room, but finding nothing he began to follow the odor,
- which seemed to flit before him. Then he recalled, for the
- first time, the story he had heard. He opened the door; the
- odor was in the hall; he opened the room where the lady died,
- but there was no odor there; until returning, after making a
- circuit of the house, he found a faint perfume as if she had
- passed but not stayed there also. At last, somewhat oppressed
- perhaps by the ghostliness of the place and hour, he went out
- and stood upon the porch. There his dream vanished. The sweet
- lawn and tree flowers were emitting an odor, as is common at
- the hour when dews congeal, more sweet than at any other time
- of day or night, and the air was redolent of sweets which might
- easily be construed into mignonette. The story was well told
- and I shall be glad to see his poem.
-
- Many good stories came off during the evening, some very
- characteristic of California; ones such as that of an uproar in
- a theatre and a man about to be killed, when someone shouts,
- “Don’t waste him, but kill a fiddler with him.” Also one of the
- opening nights at the California theatre, the place packed,
- when a man who has taken too much whiskey wishes a noise;
- immediately the manager, a strong executive man, catches him
- up with the help of a policeman, and before anybody knows the
- thing is done or the disturber what is the matter, he finds
- himself set down on the sidewalk outside in the street. “Well,”
- said he with an oath, “is this the way you do business here;
- raise a fellow before he has a chance to draw?” (referring to
- the game of poker).
-
- Mr. Harte is a very sensitive and nervous man. He struggles
- against himself all the time. He sat on the piazza with J. and
- talked till a late hour. This morning at breakfast I found him
- most interesting. He talked of his early and best-loved books.
- It appears that at the age of nine he was a lover and reader of
- Montaigne. Certain writers, he says, seem to him to stand out
- as friends and brothers side by side in literature. Now Horace
- and Montaigne are so associated in his mind. Mr. Emerson, he
- thinks, never in the least approaches a comprehension of the
- character of the man. With an admiration for his great sayings,
- he has never guessed at the subtle springs from which they
- come. The pleasant acceding to both sides in politics, and
- other traits of like nature, gives him affinity with Hawthorne.
- By the way, he is a true appreciator of Hawthorne. He was moved
- to much merriment yesterday by remembering a passage in the
- notes, where he slyly remarks, “Margaret Fuller’s cows hooked
- the other cows.” Speaking of Dr. Bartol, he said, “What a dear
- old man he is! A venerable baby, nothing more!” But Harte is
- most kindly and tender. His wife has been very ill and has
- given him cause for terrible anxiety. This accounts for much
- left undone, but he is an oblivious man oftentimes to his
- surroundings—leaves things behind!!
-
- _January 12, 1872._—Bret Harte was here at breakfast. It is
- curious to see his feeling with regard to society. For purely
- literary society, with its affectations and contempts, he has
- no sympathy. He has at length chosen New York as his residence,
- and among the Schuylers, Sherwoods, and their friends he
- appears to find what he enjoys. There is evidently a _gêne_
- about people and life here, and provincialisms which he found
- would hurt him. He is very sensitive and keen, with a love and
- reverence for Dickens almost peculiar in this coldly critical
- age. Bryant he finds very cold and totally unwilling to lead
- the conversation, as he should do when they are together, as
- he justly remarks, he being so much younger—but never a word
- without cart and horses to fetch it.
-
- Bret Harte has a queer absent-minded way of spending his time,
- letting the hours slip by as if he had not altogether learned
- their value yet. It is a miracle to us how he lives, for he
- writes very little. Thus far I suppose he has had money from J.
- R. O. & Co., but I fancy they have done with giving out money
- save for a _quid pro quo_.
-
- _February, 1872_ [during a visit to New York].—We had promised
- to dine with Mr. and Mrs. Harte early and go to the theatre
- afterward, therefore four o’clock found us at their door. He
- welcomed us by opening it himself and only this reassured
- Jamie. We had driven up in a “Crystal,” much to my amusement,
- in which J. had insisted I should sit until he discovered if
- that was the house. The scene was altogether comic. I shortened
- the ludicrousness as much as possible by jumping out and
- running quickly up the steps. Mrs. Harte was not ready to see
- me, but I found Mr. Barrett the actor with Mr. Harte in the
- parlor, and soon being invited upstairs, found Mrs. Barrett and
- Mrs. Harte together. We had a merry dinner together, the young
- actor evidently quite nervous with respect to the evening’s
- performance. He went an hour before us to the play. We sat in
- the stage box; the play was “Julius Cæsar.” It is useless to
- deny Edwin Booth great talent, exquisite grace and feeling.
- Both the young men, the first, Barrett, a man of intellect, and
- Booth, a man of inherited grace and feeling as well as good
- mind, have the advantage moreover of being born to the stage.
- Their stage habits fit them more perfectly than those of the
- drawing-room and they walk the stage with the ease that most
- men do their own parlors. During the performance Booth invited
- us into his drawing-room; a short carpeted way led from the box
- into the small room where he was sitting in Roman costume, pipe
- in mouth; he rose and called “Mary,” as we approached, when the
- tiniest woman ever called wife made her appearance. She is an
- ardent little spark of human flame and he really looks large
- beside her.
-
- But his grace, his grace! His dress too, was as usual
- perfect—more, far more than all, both the actors had such
- feeling for Shakespeare and for their parts with which they
- are filling the stage nightly, that they were deeply and truly
- enthusiastic. It was a sight to warm Shakespeare.
-
-[Illustration: BRET HARTE AND MARK TWAIN
-
-_From early photographs_]
-
- _Saturday, September 18, 1875._—Bret Harte came on the ½ past
- 12 train. He came in good health, save a headache which ripened
- as the day went on; but he was bubbling over with fun, full of
- the most natural and unexpected sallies. He wished to know if
- I was acquainted with the Cochin China hen. They had one at
- Cohasset. They had named him Benventuro (after a certain gay
- Italian singer of strong self-appreciation who came formerly
- to America). He said this hen’s state of mind on finding a
- half-exploded firecracker and her depressed condition since
- its explosion was something extraordinary. His description was
- so vivid that I still see this hen perambulating about the
- house, first with pride, second with precipitation, fallen into
- disgrace among her fellows.
-
- He said Cohasset was not the place to live in the summer if
- one wanted sea-breezes. They all came straight from Chicago!!
- He fancied the place, thinking it an old fishing village, not
- unlike Yarmouth. Instead of which they prided themselves upon
- never having “any of your sea-smells,” and, being five miles
- from the doctor, could not be considered a cheerful place to
- live in with sick children. He said he was surprised to find J.
- T. F. without a sailor’s jacket and collar. The actors among
- whom he had been living rather overdid the business; their
- collars were wider, their shirts fuller, and their trousers
- more bulgy than those of any real sailor he had ever observed,
- and the manner of hitching up the trousers was entirely
- peculiar to themselves and to the stage.
-
- We went to call upon the Burlingames. In describing Harrisburg,
- Virginia, where he had lectured, he said a committee-man came
- to invite him to take a walk, and he was so afflicted with a
- headache that he was ready to take or give away his life at
- any moment; so he accepted the invitation and walked out with
- him. The man observed that Harrisburg was a very healthy place;
- only one man a day died in that vicinity. “Oh!” said Harte,
- remembering the dangerous state of his own mind, “has that
- man died yet today?” The man shook his head gravely, never
- suspecting a joke, and said he didn’t know, but he would try to
- find out. Whereat Harte, to keep up the joke, said he wished
- he would. He went to the lecture forgetting all about it and
- saw this man hanging around without getting a chance to speak.
- The next morning very early, he managed to get an opportunity
- to speak to him. “I couldn’t find out exactly about that man
- yesterday,” he said. “What man?” said H. “Why, the one we were
- speaking of; the Coroner said he couldn’t say precisely who it
- was, but the one man would average all right.”
-
- Harte said in speaking of Longfellow that no one had yet
- overpraised him. The delicate quality of humor, the exquisite
- fineness in the choice of words, the breadth and sweetness of
- his nature were something he could hardly help worshipping. One
- day after a dinner at Mr. Lowell’s he said, “I think I will
- not have a carriage to return to town. I will walk down to the
- Square.” “I will walk with you,” said Longfellow. When they
- arrived at his gate, he said, he was so beautiful that he could
- only think of the light and whiteness of the moon, and if he
- had stayed a moment longer he should have put his arms around
- him and made a fool of himself then and there. Whereat he said
- good night abruptly and turned away.
-
- He brought his novel and play[34] with him which are just now
- finished, for us to read. He has evidently enjoyed the play,
- and he enjoys the fame and the money they both bring him.
-
- He is a dramatic, lovable creature with his blue silk
- pocket-handkerchief and red dressing slippers and his quick
- feelings. I could hate the man who could help loving him—or the
- woman either.
-
-In the passages touching upon Mark Twain now to be copied from the
-journals, he is seen, not in Boston, but in Hartford. If Mrs. Fields
-had continued her diary until 1879, there would doubtless have been a
-faithful contemporaneous account of the humorist’s unhappy attempt to
-be funny both in the presence and at the expense of the “Augustans”
-assembled in honor of Whittier’s seventieth birthday.[35] But Mrs.
-Fields’s reports of talk and observations under his own roof, in the days
-when his fame rested entirely upon a handful of his earlier books, should
-take their place in the authentic annals of an extraordinary personality.
-On the first of the two occasions recorded, Fields went alone to deliver
-a lecture in Hartford, and in answer to a post-card invitation signed
-“Mark,” stayed in the new house of the Clemenses. On the second occasion,
-three weeks later, Mrs. Fields accompanied him. After her husband’s
-return from the first visit she wrote:—
-
- _April 6, 1876._—He found Mrs. Clemens quite ill. They had been
- in New York where he had given four lectures hoping to get
- money for Dr. Brown. He had never lectured there before without
- making a great deal of money. This time he barely covered
- his expenses. He was very interesting and told J. the whole
- story of his life. They sat until midnight after the lecture,
- Mark drinking ale to make him sleepy. He says he can’t sleep
- as other people do; his kind of sleep is the only sort for
- him—three or four hours of good solid comfort—more than that
- makes him ill; he can’t afford to sleep all his thoughts away.
- He described the hunger of his childhood for books, how the
- “Fortunes of Nigel” was one of the first stories which came to
- him while he was learning to be a pilot on a Mississippi boat.
- He hid himself with it behind a barrel where he was found by
- the master, who read him a lecture upon the ruinous effects
- of reading. “I’ve seen it over and over agin,” he said. “You
- needn’t tell me anythin’ about it; if ye’re going to be a pilot
- on this river yer needn’t ever think of reading, for it just
- spiles all. Yer can’t remember how high the tides was in Can’s
- Gut three trips before the last now, I’ll wager.” “Why no,”
- said Mark, “that was six months ago.” “I don’t care if’t was,”
- said the man. “If you hadn’t been spiling yer mind by readin’
- ye’d have remembered.” So he was never allowed to read any
- more after that. “And now,” says Mark, “not being able to have
- it when I was hungry for it, I can only read the Encyclopedia
- nowadays.” Which is not true—he reads everything.
-
- The story of his courtship and marriage, too, was very strange
- and interesting. A portion of this has, however, leaked into
- the daily papers, so I will not repeat it here. One point
- interested me greatly, however, as showing the strength of
- character and rightness of vision in the man. He said he had
- not been married many months when his wife’s father came to
- him one evening and said, “My son, wouldn’t you like to go to
- Europe with your wife?” “Why yes, sir,” he said, “if I could
- afford it.” “Well then,” said he, “if you will leave off
- smoking and drinking ale you shall have ten thousand dollars
- this next year and go to Europe beside.” “Thank you, sir,”
- said Mark, “this is very good of you, and I appreciate it,
- but I can’t sell myself. I will do anything I can for you or
- any of your family, but I can’t sell myself.” The result was,
- said Mark, “I never smoked a cigar all that year nor drank a
- glass of ale; but when the next year came I found I must write
- a book, and when I sat down to write I found it wasn’t worth
- anything. I must have a cigar to steady my nerves. I began
- to smoke, and I wrote my book; but then I couldn’t sleep and
- I had to drink ale to go to sleep. Now if I had sold myself,
- I couldn’t have written my book, or I couldn’t have gone to
- sleep, but now everything works perfectly well.”
-
- He and his wife have wretched health, poor things! And in spite
- of their beautiful home must often have rather a hard time. He
- is very eccentric, disturbed by every noise, and it cannot be
- altogether easy to have care of such a man. It is a very loving
- household though Mrs. Clemens’s mother, Mrs. Langdon, hardly
- knows what to make of him sometimes, it is quite evident.
-
- _Thursday, April 27, 1876_.—We lunched and at 3 P.M. were
- en route for Hartford. I slept, and read Mr. Tom Appleton’s
- journal on the Nile, and looked out at the sunset and the
- torches of spring in the hollows, each in turn, doing more
- sleeping than either of the others, I fear, because I seem for
- some unexplained reason to be tired, as Mrs. Hawthorne used
- to say, far into the future. By giving up to it, however, I
- felt quite fresh when we arrived, at half-past seven o’clock,
- Mr. Clemens’ (Mark Twain’s) carriage waiting for us to take
- us to the hall where he was to perform for the second night
- in succession Peter Spyle in the “Loan of a Lover.” It is a
- pretty play, and the girl’s part, Gertrude, was well done by
- Miss Helen Smith; but Mr. Clemens’ part was a creation. I see
- no reason why, if he chose to adopt the profession of actor,
- he should not be as successful as Jefferson in whatever he
- might conclude to undertake. It is really amazing to see what
- a man of genius can do beside what is usually considered his
- legitimate sphere.
-
-[Illustration: _Facsimile verses and letter from Mark Twain to Fields_]
-
- Afterward we went with Mr. Hammersley to the Club for a bit
- of supper—this I did not wish to do, but I was overruled of
- course by the decision of our host. We met at supper one of
- the clever actors who played in a little operetta called “The
- Artful Mendicants.” It was after twelve o’clock when we finally
- reached Mr. Clemens’ house. He believed his wife would have
- retired, as she is very delicate in health; but there she was
- expecting us, with a pretty supper table laid. When her husband
- discovered this, he fell down on his knees in mock desire for
- forgiveness. His mind was so full of the play, and with the
- poor figure he felt he had made in it, that he had entirely
- forgotten all her directions and injunctions. She is a very
- small, sweet-looking, simple, finished creature, charming in
- her ways and evidently deeply beloved by him. The house is a
- brick villa, designed by one of the first New York architects,
- standing in a lovely lawn which slopes down to a small stream
- or river at the side. In this spring season the blackbirds are
- busy in the trees and the air is sweet and vocal. Inside there
- is great luxury. Especially I delight in a lovely conservatory
- opening out of the drawing-room.
-
- Although we had already eaten supper, the gentlemen took a
- glass of lager beer to keep Mrs. Clemens company while she ate
- a bit of bread after her long anxiety and waiting. Meantime Mr.
- Clemens talked. The quiet earnest manner of his speech would
- be impossible to reproduce, but there is a drawl in his tone
- peculiar to himself. Also he is much interested in actors and
- the art of acting just now, and seriously talks of going to
- Boston next week to the début of Anna Dickinson.
-
- We were a tired company and went soon to bed and to sleep. I
- slept late, but I found Mr. Clemens had been re-reading Dana’s
- “Two Years before the Mast” in bed early and revolving subjects
- for his “Autobiography.” Their two beautiful baby girls came
- to pass an hour with us after breakfast—exquisite affectionate
- children, the very fountain of joy to their interesting
- parents....
-
- Returning to lunch, I found our host and hostess and eldest
- little girl in the drawing-room. We fell into talk of the
- mishaps of the stage and the disadvantage of an amateur under
- such circumstances. “For instance, on the first night of our
- little play,” said Mr. Clemens, “the trousers of one of the
- actors suddenly gave way entirely behind, which was very
- distressing to him, though we did not observe it at all.”
-
- I want to stop here to give a little idea of the appearance of
- our host. He is forty years old, with some color in his cheeks
- and a heavy light-colored moustache, and overhanging light
- eyebrows. His eyes are grey and piercing, yet soft, and his
- whole face expresses great sensitiveness. He is exquisitely
- neat also, though careless, and his hands are small, not
- without delicacy. He is a small man, but his mass of hair seems
- the one rugged-looking thing about him. I thought in the play
- last night that it was a wig.
-
- To return to our lunch table—he proceeded to speak of his
- “Autobiography,” which he intends to write as fully and simply
- as possible to leave behind him. His wife laughingly said she
- should look it over and leave out objectionable passages. “No,”
- he said, very earnestly, almost sternly, “_you_ are not to edit
- it—it is to appear as it is written, with the whole tale told
- as truly as I can tell it. I shall take out passages from it,
- and publish as I go along in the ‘Atlantic’ and elsewhere, but
- I shall not limit myself as to space, and at whatever age I am
- writing about, even if I am an infant, and an idea comes to me
- about myself when I am forty, I shall put that in. Every man
- feels that his experience is unlike that of anybody else, and
- therefore he should write it down. He finds also that everybody
- else has thought and felt on some points precisely as he has
- done, and therefore he should write it down.”
-
- The talk naturally branched to education, and thence to the
- country. He has lost all faith in our government. This wicked
- ungodly suffrage, he said, where the vote of a man who knew
- nothing was as good as the vote of a man of education and
- industry; this endeavor to equalize what God had made unequal
- was a wrong and a shame. He only hoped to live long enough to
- see such a wrong and such a government overthrown. Last summer
- he wrote an article for the “Atlantic,” printed without any
- signature, proposing the only solution of such evil of which
- he could conceive. “It is too late now,” he continued, “to
- restrict the suffrage; we must increase it—for this let us give
- every university man, let us say, ten votes, and every man with
- common-school education two votes, and a man of superior power
- and position a hundred votes, if we choose. This is the only
- way I see to get out of the false position into which we have
- fallen.”
-
- At five, the hour appointed for dinner, I returned to the
- drawing-room where our host lay at full length on the floor
- with his head on cushions in the bay-window, reading, and
- taking what he called “delicious comfort.” Mrs. Perkins came in
- to dinner, and we had a cosy good time. Mr. Clemens described
- the preaching of a Western clergyman, a great favorite, with
- the smallest possible allowance of idea to the largest possible
- amount of words. It was so truthfully and vividly portrayed
- that we all concluded, perhaps, since the man was in such
- earnest, he moved his audience more than if he had troubled
- them with too many ideas. This truthfulness of Mr. Clemens,
- which will hardly allow him to portray anything in a way to
- make out a case by exaggerating or distorting a truth, is a
- wondrous and noble quality. This makes art and makes life, and
- will continue to make him a daily increasing power among us.
-
- He is so unhappy and discontented with our government that he
- says he is not conscious of the least emotion of patriotism
- in himself. He is overwhelmed with shame and confusion and
- wishes he were not an American. He thinks seriously of going
- to England to live for a while, at least, and I think it not
- unlikely he may discover away from home a love of his country
- which is still waiting to be unfolded. I believe hope must
- dawn for us, that so much earnest endeavor of our statesmen
- and patriots cannot come to naught; and perhaps the very idea
- he has dropped, never believing that it can bring forth fruit,
- will be adopted in the end for our salvation. Certainly women’s
- suffrage and such a change as he proposes should be tried,
- since we cannot keep the untenable ground of the present....
-
- It is most curious and interesting to watch this growing man
- of forty—to see how he studies and how high his aims are. His
- conversation is always earnest and careful, though full of
- fun. He is just now pondering much upon actors and their ways.
- Raymond, who is doing the “Gilded Age,” is so hopelessly given
- “to saving at the spigot and losing at the bung-hole” that he
- is evidently not over-satisfied nor does he count the acting
- everything it might be.
-
- We sat talking, chiefly we women, after dinner and looking at
- the sunset. Mr. Clemens lay down with a book and J. went to
- look over his lecture. I did not go to lecture, but after all
- were gone I scribbled away at these pages and nearly finished
- Mr. Appleton’s “Nile Journal.” They returned rather late,
- it was after ten, bearing a box of delicious strawberries,
- Mrs. Colt’s gift from her endless greenhouses. They were
- a sensation; the whole of summer was foreshadowed by their
- scarlet globes. Some beer was brought for Mr. Clemens (who
- drinks nothing else, and as he eats but little this seems to
- answer the double end of nourishment and soothing for the
- nerves) and he began again to talk. He said it was astonishing
- what subjects were missed by the Poet Laureate. He thought
- the finest incident of the Crimean War had been certainly
- overlooked. That was the going down at sea of the man of
- war, Berkeley Castle. The ship with a whole regiment, one of
- the finest of the English army, on board, struck a rock near
- the Bosphorus. There was no help—the bottom was out and the
- boats would only hold the crew and the other helpless ones;
- there was no chance for the soldiers. The Colonel summoned
- them on deck; he told them the duty of soldiers was to die;
- they would do their duty as bravely there as if they were on
- the battle-field. He bade them shoulder arms and prepare for
- action. The drums beat, flags were flying, the service playing,
- as they all went down to silent death in the great deep.
-
- Afterward Mr. Clemens described to us the reappearance before
- his congregation of an old clergyman who had been incapacitated
- for work during twelve years—coming suddenly into the pulpit
- just as the first hymn was ended. The younger pastor proposed
- they should sing the old man’s favorite, “Coronation,”
- _omitting_ the first verse. He heard nothing of the omission,
- but beginning at the first verse he sang in a cracked treble
- the remaining stanza after all the people were still. There
- was a mingling of the comic and pathetic in this incident which
- made it consonant with the genius of our host. Our dear little
- hostess complained of want of air, and I saw she was very
- tired, so we all went to bed about eleven.
-
- _Saturday morning._—Dear J. was up early and out in the
- beautiful sunshine. I read and scribbled until breakfast at
- half-past nine. It was a lovely morning, and I had already
- ventured out of my window and round the house to hear the
- birds sing and see the face of spring before the hour came for
- breakfast. When I did go to the drawing-room, however, I found
- Mr. Clemens alone. He greeted me apparently as cheerfully as
- ever, and it was not until some moments had passed that he told
- me they had a very sick child upstairs. From that instant I
- saw, especially after his wife came in, that they could think
- of nothing else. They were half-distracted with anxiety. Their
- messenger could not find the doctor, which made matters worse.
- However, the little girl did not really seem very sick, so I
- could not help thinking they were unnecessarily excited. The
- effect on them, however, was just as bad as if the child were
- really very ill. The messenger was hardly despatched the second
- time before Jamie and Mr. Clemens began to talk of our getting
- away in the next train, whereat he (Mr. C.) said to his wife,
- “Why didn’t you tell me of that,” etc., etc. It was all over
- in a moment, but in his excitement he spoke more quickly than
- he knew, and his wife felt it. Nothing was said at the time,
- indeed we hardly observed it, but we were intensely amused and
- could not help finding it pathetic too afterward, when he came
- to us and said he spent the larger part of his life on his
- knees making apologies and now he had got to make an apology
- to us about the carriage. He was always bringing the blood to
- his wife’s face by his bad behavior, and here this very morning
- he had said such things about that carriage! His whole life
- was one long apology. His wife had told him to see how well we
- behaved (poor we!) and he knew he had everything to learn.
-
- He was so amusing about it that he left us in a storm of
- laughter, yet at bottom I could see it was no laughing matter
- to him. He is in dead earnest, with a desire for growth
- and truth in life, and with such a sincere admiration for
- his wife’s sweetness and beauty of character that the most
- prejudiced and hardest heart could not fail to fall in love
- with him. She looked like an exquisite lily as we left her.
- So white and delicate and tender. Such sensitiveness and
- self-control as she possesses are very, very rare.
-
- _May Day._—Longfellow, Greene, Alexander Agassiz and Dr. Holmes
- dined with us. This made summer, Longfellow said at table—that
- this was May Day enough, it was no matter how cold it was
- outside. (The wind outside had been raging all day and winter
- seemed to be giving us a last fling.) Jamie recalled one or
- two things “Mark Twain” had said which I have omitted. When
- he lectured a few weeks ago in New York, he said he had just
- reached the middle of his lecture and was going on with flying
- colors when he saw in the audience just in front of him a noble
- gray head and beard. “Nobody told me that William Cullen
- Bryant was there, but I had seen his picture and I knew that
- was the old man. I was sure he saw the failure I was making,
- and all the weak points in what I was saying, and I couldn’t do
- anything more—that old man just spoiled my work. Then they told
- me afterward that my lecture was good and all that; I could
- only say, ‘no, no, that fine old head spoiled all I had to say
- _that_ night.’”
-
- Longfellow was quite like himself again, but the talk was
- mainly sustained by Dr. Holmes and Mr. Agassiz. When Dr. Holmes
- first came in he looked earnestly at the portrait of Sydney
- Smith. “It reminds me of our famous story-teller, Sullivan,”
- he said; “it is full of epicureanism. _The mouth is made for
- kisses and canvas-backs._” Later on in the dinner, when Mr.
- Agassiz was describing the fatigue he suffered after talking
- Spanish all day while he still understood the language very
- imperfectly, “Why,” said Holmes, “it’s like playing the piano
- with mittens on.”
-
- There was something pathetic in the fact of this young man
- sitting here among his father’s friends, almost in the very
- place his father had filled so many times—but his speech
- was manly and wise, from a full brain. They talked of the
- spectroscope as on the whole the most important discovery
- the world had known. “Well, what is it?” said Longfellow.
- “Explain it to us.” (I was glad enough to have him ask.)
- Agassiz explained quite clearly that it was an instrument to
- discover the elements which compose the sun, and proceeded
- to unfold its working in some detail. Two men made the
- discovery simultaneously, one in India and one in England.
- This spectroscope has been infinitely improved, however, by
- every living mind brought to bear upon it, almost, since its
- first so-called discovery. It is so difficult, Dr. H. said,
- to tell where an invention began; you could go back until it
- seemed that no man that ever lived really did it—like some
- verses, whereupon one of Gray’s was given as an example. The
- talk turned somewhat upon the manner of putting things, the
- English manner being so poor and inexpressive compared with the
- southern natures—the French being the masters of expression.
-
- Longfellow gave a delightful account of the old artist and
- spiritualist, Kirkup, the discoverer of the Dante portrait,
- though Greene undertook to say that a certain Wilde was the
- man. I never heard anybody else have the credit but Kirkup, and
- certainly England believes it was he.
-
- I think they all had “a good time”; I am sure I did.
-
-[Illustration: CHARLES SUMNER]
-
-As Mark Twain, in the preceding pages may be said to have led the reader
-back into the Boston and Cambridge circle, so there were constant
-excursions of interest from that circle out into the world in which such
-a man as Sumner stood as the friend of such another as Longfellow. For
-twenty-three years, from 1851 till his death in 1874, Sumner was a member
-of the United States Senate, and consequently was much more to be seen
-in Washington than in the State he represented. He appears from time to
-time in the pages of Mrs. Fields’s diary, and in the two ensuing passages
-figures first at her Boston dinner-table and then in Washington:
-
- _Saturday, November 18, 1865._—Last night Miss Kate Field
- and Charles Sumner dined with us. Before we went to dinner
- Charlotte Foster, the young colored girl whom Elizabeth
- Whittier was so fond of and who is now secretary of the
- Freedmen’s Bureau, came in to call. She is very pretty
- and good. It is difficult nevertheless for her to find a
- boarding-place. People do not readily admit a colored woman
- into their families. I shall help her to find a good home....
-
- Mr. Sumner opened the conversation at dinner by asking Miss
- Field to tell him something of Mr. Landor. She, smiling, said
- that was difficult now because she had talked and written so
- much of him that she hardly knew what was left unsaid. Mr.
- Sumner described his own first introduction then at the house
- of his old friend, Mr. Kenyon, in London. He had dropped in
- there by accident, but was positively engaged elsewhere at
- dinner; before he left, however, he was able to parry skilfully
- a remark aimed at the Yankees, which tickled Mr. Landor and
- made him try to hold on and induce him to stay. He was obliged
- to go then, however, but he returned a few days after to
- breakfast, when Landor asked him why the body of Washington
- did not rest in the Capitol at Washington. “Because,” said Mr.
- Sumner, “his family wished his ashes to remain at Mt. Vernon.”
- “Ashes,” said L., “his body was not burned; why do you say
- ‘ashes,’ sir?” “I quoted, ‘E’en in our ashes live their wonted
- fires,’ and he said nothing more at the time, but,” added Mr.
- Sumner, “I have never used ‘ashes’ since.”
-
- Kate Field said “his wife was a perfect fiend”; but Mr. Sumner
- was inclined to doubt the statement. “These marriages with men
- of genius are hard,” he said, “because genius wins the race in
- the end.”
-
- Then Kate brought the authority of Mr. Browning and others to
- back her statement, but, referring to Mr. Landor’s temper, she
- said that while the Storys were at Siena passing the summer one
- year, the Brownings took a villa near by and Mr. Landor lived
- opposite, while she and Miss Isa Blagden went down to make the
- Brownings a visit. During their stay Mr. Landor fancied that
- the stock of tea lately purchased for his use was poisoned,
- and threw it all out of the window. The Contadine reaped the
- benefit of this; they came and gathered it up like a flock of
- doves.
-
- Mr. Sumner spoke of the high, very high place he accorded to
- Mr. Landor as a writer of prose. He had been a source of great
- admiration to him for years, he said. As long ago as when G.
- W. Greene was living in Rome and first becoming a writer,
- he asked Mr. Sumner what masters of prose he should study.
- “Then,” said Mr. S., “you remember his own style was bad; the
- sentences apt to be jumbled up together. I told him to read
- Bacon, and Hooker, and all the prose of Dryden he could find
- in the prefaces and elsewhere, and Walter Savage Landor; and
- my reverence for Mr. Landor as a writer of prose has never
- diminished.”
-
- Later during the dinner, talking of his life abroad, Mr. Sumner
- was reminded of a letter he had received from John P. Hale,
- our minister plenipotentiary to Spain. He said for a number
- of years, while Mr. Hale was in the Senate, whenever appeals
- came from our foreign ministers or consuls abroad asking for
- increase of salary, Mr. Hale would jump up and say, “Gentlemen
- of the Senate, allow me to say I would engage to live at any
- point in Europe upon the salary now granted by the Government.
- It is no economy, indeed it is a great lack of economy, to
- think of raising these salaries.”
-
- “Hereupon comes a letter from Spain urging an increase of
- salary in terms which would convulse the Senate with laughter
- after the protestations they have heard so often. I should like
- nothing better than to read it to them.” For the lack of their
- presence, however, he read it to us, and it was amusing truly,
- as if the old days and speeches were a blank.
-
- Mr. Sumner easily slipped from this subject into others
- connected with the Government.
-
- Kate Field said that Judge Russell told her that President
- Johnson was no better than a sot, and that the head of the
- Washingtonian Home (a refuge for inebriates here) had been
- sent for, as a man having skill in such cases, to try to save
- him. “Is this true, Mr. Sumner?” she asked. Mr. Sumner said
- not one word at first; then asked, “What authority had Judge
- Russell for making such an assertion?” Kate did not know, and
- I thought on the whole Mr. Sumner, who knew the man had really
- been sent for by the President himself, it is supposed for some
- other reason, doubted the whole tale. I doubted it sincerely
- from the first moment, and I wonder a man can be left to say
- such things.
-
- Sumner then continued to describe very vividly what he had
- known of Andy Johnson’s behavior. When he left Tennessee to
- come to Washington to be Vice-President, he travelled with a
- negro servant and two demijohns of whiskey which he dispensed
- freely, drinking enough himself at the same time to arrive at
- Washington in a maudlin condition, in which state he remained
- until after the fourth of March. He was then living at the
- hotel, and a young Massachusetts officer, who lived on the
- same floor and was obliged to pass Mr. Johnson’s door many
- times a day, told Mr. S. that during the two days subsequent
- to Mr. Johnson’s arrival he saw, while passing his room, and
- counted twenty-six glasses of whiskey go in. At length good men
- interfered; they saw delirium tremens or some other dreadful
- thing would be the result if this continued, and old Mr. Blair
- went with Mr. Preston King and persuaded Mr. Johnson to go
- down and stay at Mr. Blair’s house, and he surrendered at
- discretion. It was a small house and a very quiet family, but
- they stowed Mr. Johnson away and Mr. King also, who was kind
- enough to offer to take care of him. Shortly after this Mr.
- Lincoln and Mr. Sumner had gone down the river in a yacht, and
- had landed at General Grant’s headquarters. They were sitting
- together at two desks reading the papers for the day when
- Mr. Sumner observed a figure darken the door, and looking up
- found Mr. Johnson. “Ah, Mr. Vice-President, how do you do,” he
- said, putting his papers aside. “Mr. President, here is the
- Vice-President.” Mr. Lincoln arose and extended his hand, but
- as Mr. Sumner thought very coldly, and after a short time they
- started again for their yacht. Mr. Johnson walked as far as the
- wharf, talking with Mr. Lincoln, but when they arrived there,
- Mr. Lincoln did not say, “Come with us and have lunch,” or
- “Come at night and have dinner,” but bade him simply “Good-bye”
- there, where they observed him afterward watching their
- departure with Mr. King by his side, who had come to rejoin him.
-
- “This,” said Mr. Sumner, “is all Mr. Lincoln saw of Mr.
- Johnson. One week after this time the President was
- assassinated, and they never met from that hour until his
- death.”
-
- Mr. Sumner thinks Mr. Beecher is making a dangerous and deadly
- mistake, and told him so. He said further to Mr. B. that his
- anxieties prevented him from sleeping, that he had not slept
- for three nights. “I should think so,” Mr. Beecher replied,
- “you talk like a man who had been deprived of his natural
- rest.” The two men have a respect for each other and talk
- kindly of each other, but they do not see things from the same
- point of view now at all.
-
- _Friday morning, March 21, 1872._—L. W. J. and her daughter met
- us at the cars [in New York] bound to go with us to Washington.
- A pleasant day’s journey we had of it with their friendly faces
- to accompany us and with Colonel Winthrop to meet us at the
- train. The evening of our arrival Jamie went at once to see
- Charles Sumner who lives in a fine house adjoining our hotel.
- Nothing could be finer than the situation he has chosen. He
- kept J. until midnight and tried to detain him still longer,
- but the knowledge that I was waiting for him made him insist at
- length upon coming away. He found him better in health than he
- had supposed from the newspapers, and “the same old Sumner,” as
- Jamie said.
-
- Saturday morning I went in early with J. and passed the entire
- morning with the Senator. Several colored persons came in
- as we sat there, and those who were people of eminence were
- introduced. He talked of literature and showed us his own
- curiosities which appear to be numberless. Jamie was called
- away, but he urged me to stay. He said he had sent a message to
- the Senate which required a reply and he expected every moment
- to hear the sound of hoofs on the pavement, as he had requested
- a special messenger to be sent on horseback. The messenger did
- not arrive, but I stayed on all the same until his carriage
- came to take him to the Capitol, when he insisted that I should
- accompany him. He showed me all the wonders of the place,
- not forgetting the doors which Crawford never lived even to
- design in clay altogether, but which his wife, desiring to
- have the money, caused to be finished by her husband’s workmen
- and foisted upon our Government. They are poor enough. Sumner
- opposed her in what he considered a dishonest attempt to get
- money, but of course he could not make an open opposition of
- this nature against a lady, the widow of his friend.
-
- Sumner’s character is one of the most extraordinary pictures
- of opposing elements ever combined in one person. He is so
- possessed by Sumner that there is really no room for the fair
- existence of another in his world. Position, popularity,
- domestic happiness, health, have one by one been cut away
- from him, but he still stands erect, with as large a faith in
- Sumner and with as determined a look toward the future as if it
- beckoned him to glory and happiness. I suppose he must believe
- that the next turn of Fortune’s wheel must give him the favor
- he has now lost; but were he another man, all the honors of
- the state could hardly recompense him in the least for what
- he has lost. He has a firm proud spirit which his terrible
- bodily suffering does not appear to make falter. His health
- is so precarious that doubtless a few more adverse strokes
- would finish him; but he has had all there are to have, one
- would say. His friends, however, uphold him most tenderly;
- letters from dear Mrs. Child and others lay upon his table
- urging him to put away all excitement and try to live for the
- service of the state. Public honor, probity, the high service
- of his country seem to be the passions which animate him and
- by which he endures. He has a mania for collecting rare books
- and pictures nowadays and it is almost pitiful to see how
- this fancy runs away with him and how he must frequently be
- deceived. The tragedy of his marriage would be far more tragic
- if it had left any scar (as far as mortal can discover) save
- upon his pride. I would not do a man whom I hold in such honor
- any injustice, but he never _seemed_ in love.
-
- _Sunday._—Not well—kept to my room in the Arlington Hotel all
- day, obliged to refuse to see guests also, and dear J. has gone
- alone to dine with Sumner. I had hoped to see his home once
- more and to see him among his peers. There is always a doubt of
- course, but especially in his state of health, whether we may
- ever meet again. If not, I shall not soon forget his stately
- carriage at the Capitol yesterday nor the store he sets at
- present upon his counted friends.
-
- He pointed out the great avenue named Massachusetts, and the
- school house named after himself, with a just and noble pride
- yesterday. The trees are all ready to burst into leaf. Read
- Bayard Taylor’s Norwegian story, “Lars”—very sweet and fine it
- is—just missing “an excuse for being.” L. J. fills us with new
- respect and regard. Her devotion to her daughter is so perfect
- and so wise.
-
- Jamie returned about 12 o’clock. There had been a gorgeous
- dinner. The guests were Caleb Cushing, Carl Schurz, Perley
- Poore, Mr. Hill, J. T. F. The service was worthy of the house
- of an English nobleman, the feast worthy of Lucullus. It fairly
- astonished J. to see Sumner eat. He of course sat at S.’s
- right. Not a wine, nor a dish, was left untasted and even the
- richest puddings were taken in large quantities. I thought
- of poor Mrs. Child and other devout admirers of this their
- Republican (!) leader, then of Charlotte Brontë’s story of
- Thackeray at dinner. Some day, said J., we shall take up the
- paper and find Sumner is no more, and it will be after one of
- these dinners.
-
- The talk astonished J., utterly unused as he is to look behind
- the scenes of government. Caleb Cushing, a man over 70, who
- appears to have the vigor of 50, called Stanton “a master
- of duplicity.” Caleb Cushing said Seward was the first man
- who introduced ungentlemanly bearing into the Cabinet. Until
- he came there, there was no smoking, no putting up of the
- feet, but always a fine courtesy and dignity of behavior was
- preserved.
-
-Before leaving the diaries from which so many pages have already been
-drawn, before letting the last of the familiar faces which look out from
-them fade again from sight, it would be a pity not to assemble a few
-entries recalling notable persons of whom Mrs. Fields made fragmentary
-but significant record. Here, for instance, are glimpses of Henry Ward
-Beecher, fresh from the great service he rendered to the Union cause in
-the Civil War by his speeches in England.
-
- _Tuesday, November 17, 1863._—J. T. F. saw Mr. Kennard today
- and we heard from him the particulars of Mr. Beecher’s landing.
- He came on shore in the warm fog which was the precursor of
- the heavy rain we have today, at 3 o’clock A.M. of Sunday. He
- went to the Parker House until day should break and Mr. Kennard
- could come and take him to the retirement of Brookline, to
- pass the day until the train should leave for New York. News
- of his arrival getting abroad, a company of orthodox deacons
- waited upon him very early to invite him to preach. “Gentlemen,
- do you take me for a fool,” he said, “to jump so readily into
- the harness of the pulpit even before the fatigue of the voyage
- has worn away?” He heard of the illness of one of his younger
- children and therefore hastened as quickly as possible toward
- home.
-
- The day before the one upon which he was to speak at Exeter
- Hall he awoke in the morning with a heavy headache; his voice,
- too, was seriously impaired by over-use. He wanted to speak,
- his whole heart was in it, yet how in this condition? He shut
- himself up in the house all that day and hoped for better
- things and went early to bed that night. The next morning at
- dawn he awoke, he opened his eyes quickly. “Is God to suffer me
- to do this work?” He leaped from the bed with a bound. His head
- was clear and fresh, but his voice—he hardly dared to try that.
- “I will speak to my sister three thousand miles away,” he said,
- and cried, “Harriet.” The tones were clear and strong. “Thank
- God!” he said—then speedily dressed—trying his voice again and
- again—then he sat down and wrote off the heads of his address.
- All he needed to say came freshly and purely to his mind just
- in the form he wished. The day ebbed away and the carriage came
- to take him to the hall. When he descended to the street, to
- his surprise there was a long file of policemen, through whom
- he was conducted because of the crowds waiting about his door.
- He was obliged to descend also at some distance from Exeter
- Hall, and he was again conducted through another line of police
- before he reached the door. The people pushed and cried out
- so that he ran from the carriage towards the hall; and one of
- the staid policemen, observing a man running, cried out and
- caught him by the coat-tail saying he mustn’t run there, that
- line was preserved for the great speaker. “Well, my friend,”
- said Mr. Beecher, “I can tell you one thing. There won’t be
- much speaking till I get there.” While he hurried on, he felt
- a woman lay hold of the skirts of his coat. The police, seeing
- her, tried to push her away, but she said to one of them, “I
- belong to his party.” Mr. B. said, “I overheard the poor thing,
- but I thought if she chose to tell a lie I would not push her
- away; but as I neared the door she crept up and whispered to
- me, ‘I am one of your people. Don’t you remember ——, a Scotch
- woman who used to live in Brooklyn and go to the Plymouth
- Church? I have thought of this for weeks and longed and dreamt
- of being with you again. Now my desire is heard.’”
-
- The rest of this wonderful night the public journals and his
- own letters can tell us of—have told us. He has been as it were
- a man raised up for this dark hour of our dear Country. May he
- live to see the promised land, and not only from the top of
- Pisgah.
-
- _December 10, 1863._—Visit from H. W. Beecher.... Mr. Beecher
- did not like Mr. Browning. He found him flippant and worldly.
- To be sure he had but one interview and could scarcely judge,
- but had he met the man by chance in a company he should never
- have sought him a second time. He said of Charles Lamb that he
- always reminded him of a honeysuckle growing between and over
- a rough trellis; it would cover the stakes, it would throw
- out blossoms and tendrils, it would attract hummingbirds and
- make corners for their nests and fill the wide air with its
- fragrance. Such was C. Lamb to him.
-
- He was sure he could have liked Mrs. Browning—so credulous,
- generous, outspoken. He liked strong outspoken people, yet he
- liked serene people too; but then, he loved the world in its
- wide variety.
-
- He said his boy wished to be either a stage-driver or a
- missionary. His fancy was for stage-driving; he thought perhaps
- his duty might make him a missionary....
-
- It was such a privilege to see him back and such a privilege to
- grasp his hand, I could say nothing but be happy and thankful.
-
-A few years later a passing shape from still an earlier generation casts
-its shadow of tragic outline across the pages of the diary.
-
- _Sunday, January 6, 1867._—A driving snow-storm. Last night
- Jamie went to the Club; met W. Everett, who said that while his
- father was member of Congress and was at one time returning
- from Washington to Boston he was stopped in the street as he
- passed through Philadelphia by a haggard man wrapped in a
- cloak. “I am Aaron Burr,” said the figure, “and I pray you to
- ask Congress for an appropriation to aid me in my misery.”
- Mr. E. replied that the member from his own district was the
- person to whom to apply. “I know that,” was the sad rejoinder,
- “but the others are all strangers to me and I pray you to help
- me.” After some reflection Mr. Everett promised to try to do
- something in his behalf; fortunately, however, he was released
- by death before Congress was again in session.
-
-Then soon appears a more cheerful figure, in the person of the Rev.
-Elijah Kellogg whose lines of “Spartacus to the Gladiators” have
-resounded in many a schoolhouse. His tales of the Stowes and the family
-Bible may still divert a generation that knows not Spartacus.
-
- _Thursday, January 10, 1867._—Yesterday J. fell in with a Mr.
- Kellogg, a clergyman from Harpswell, Maine, the author of many
- noble things, among the rest, of the “Speech of Spartacus”
- which is in Sargent’s “School Speaker,” a piece of which the
- boys are very fond, but the masters are obliged to forbid
- their speaking it because it always takes the prize. He wrote
- it while in college, to speak himself. He went to school with
- Longfellow, though he is younger than the poet, and the latter
- calls him a man of genius. He is a preacher of the gospel and
- for the past ten months has been speaking every Sunday at
- the Sailor’s Bethel with great effect. He called to see J.
- and told him some queer anecdotes regarding his sea-life. He
- dresses like a fisherman, red shirt, etc., while at home. He
- remembers Professor Stowe and his wife well. He says their
- arrival at Brunswick was looked for with eagerness by many,
- with some natural curiosity by himself. One day about the time
- they were expected he was in his boat floating near the pier
- and preparing to return to his island where he lives, as the
- tide was going down and if he delayed much longer he would be
- ashore; but he observed a woman sitting on a cask upon the
- wharf swinging her heels, with two large holes the size of a
- dollar each in the back of her stockings, a man standing by her
- side, and several children playing about. At once he believed
- it must be the new professor, so he dallied about in his boat
- observing them. Presently the man cried out, “Hallo there, will
- you give my wife a sail?” “I can’t,” he replied, “there’s no
- wind.” “Will you give her a row then?” “The tide’s too low and
- I shan’t get home.” “Oh,” said the woman, “we will pay you;
- you’d better take me out a little way.” “No, I can’t,” he said.
- Presently he heard somebody say something about that’s being
- the minister and not a fisherman at all. “Do you think so?”
- said Mrs. Stowe. With that he dropped down into the bottom of
- his boat and was off before another word.
-
- He told Mr. Fields also of the professor who preceded Professor
- Stowe. He was an unmarried man with three sisters, all of
- whom were insane at times and frequently one of them was away
- from home in an asylum. One day the brother was away, the
- eldest sister being at home in apparently good health, when
- another professor came to visit them to whom she wished to
- be particularly polite. “What will you have for dinner,” said
- she, “today?” “Oh! the best thing you’ve got,” he replied. So
- when dinner came she had stewed the family Bible with cabbage
- for his repast. He speaks with the greatest enthusiasm of the
- beauty of that Maine coast. We must go there.
-
-Out of what seems a past almost pre-Augustan come these memories of N. P.
-Willis, a poet who suffered the misfortune of outliving much of his own
-fame.
-
- _Thursday, January 31, 1867._—The papers of last night brought
- the news of N. P. Willis’s death and that he was to be buried
- in Boston from St. Paul’s Church today. Early this morning
- a note came from Mrs. Willis asking Mr. Fields to see Dr.
- Howe and Edmund Quincy, to ask them to be pall-bearers with
- himself and Colonel Trimble. Fortunately last night J. had
- seen the announcement, and before going to Longfellow’s made
- up his mind to ask Longfellow and Lowell to come in to assist
- at the ceremony of their brother-author; he had also sent to
- Professor Holmes before the note came from Mrs. Willis. He then
- sent immediately for the others whom she mentioned and for a
- quantity of exquisite flowers. All his plans turned out as he
- had arranged and hoped and the poet’s grave was attended by the
- noblest America had to offer. The dead face was not exposed,
- but the people pressed forward to take a sprig from the coffin
- in memory of one who had strewn many a flower of thought on
- the hard way of their lives. There are some to speak hardly of
- Willis, but usually the awe of death ennobles his memory to the
- grateful world of his appreciators. “Refrain! refrain!” we long
- to say to the others who would carp. “If you have tears, shed
- them on the poet’s grave.”
-
- There had been previously an exquisite and touching service at
- Idlewild where Octavius Frothingham did all a man could do,
- inspired by the occasion and the loveliness of the day and
- scene. The service here would have seemed cold as stone except
- for the gracious poets who surrounded the body and prevented
- one thought of chill lack of sympathy from penetrating the
- flowers with which it was covered. I could not restrain my
- tears when I remembered a few years, only two, and the same
- company had borne Hawthorne’s body to its burial. Which, which,
- of that beloved and worshipped few was next to be borne by the
- weeping remnant!!
-
- _Wednesday, July 1, 1868._—In our walk yesterday J. delighted
- himself and me by rehearsing his memories of Willis. J. was at
- the Astor House when Willis returned first from Europe with his
- young bride. He was then the observed of all observers. As in
- those days travellers crossed in sailing vessels, his coming
- was not heralded; the first that was known of their arrival was
- when he walked into the Astor with his beautiful young wife
- upon his arm. He wore a brown cloak thrown gracefully about his
- shoulders and was a man to remind one of Lady Blessington’s
- saying, “If Willis had been born to £10,000 a year he would
- have been a perfect man.” He was then at the head of the world
- of literature in America; his influence could do anything and
- his heart and purse were both at the service of the needy
- asker. Unfortunately from the first he never paid his debts.
- J. said he never believed the tales of Willis’s dissipation.
- He spent money freely even when he had it not. All the English
- folk, lords and ladies, who then came to see America were the
- guests of Willis.
-
- I asked what his wife was like! “Like a seraph. She was lovely
- with all womanly attractions.”
-
-Of the various “causes” to which Mrs. Fields and her husband paid
-allegiance, the cause of equal opportunity for men and women cannot
-justly be left unmentioned. They espoused it before its friends were
-taken with the seriousness they have long commanded, and, as the
-following passage will suggest, were full of sympathy with those who
-fought its early battles. The impact of one of these combatants, Mrs.
-Mary A. Livermore, a reformer in sundry fields, against the rock of
-conservatism represented by the President of Harvard College, is the
-subject of a lively bit of record.
-
- _September 22, 1876._—At four came Miss Phelps, at six came
- Mrs. Livermore. Ah! She is indeed a great woman—a strong arm to
- those who are weak, a new faith in time of trouble. She came to
- tea as fresh as if she had been calmly sunning herself all the
- week instead of speaking at a great meeting at Faneuil Hall the
- previous evening and taking cold in the process. She talked
- most wittily and brilliantly, beside laughing most heartily and
- merrily over all dear J.’s absurd stories and illustrations.
- He told her of a woman who came to speak to him after one of
- his lectures, to thank him for what he was trying to do for the
- education of women. She said, “I was educated at home with my
- brothers and taught all they were taught, learning my lessons
- by their side and reciting with them until the time came for
- them to go to college. Nobody ever told me I was not to go to
- college! And when the moment arrived and it dawned upon me that
- I was to be left behind to do nothing, to learn nothing more, I
- was terribly unhappy.”
-
- “I know just how she felt,” said Mrs. Livermore; “there was a
- party of six of us girls, sisters and cousins, who had studied
- with our brothers up to the time for going to college. We were
- all ready, but what was to be done? We were told that no girls
- had entered Harvard thus far. We said to each other, we six
- girls will go to Cambridge and call upon President Quincy, show
- him where we stand in our lessons, and ask him to admit us. I
- was the youngest of the party. I was noted for being rather hot
- and intemperate in speech in those days, and the girls made me
- promise before we left the house [not to speak]—‘For as sure as
- you do,’ they said, ‘you will spoil all.’ So I promised, and we
- went to Cambridge and found Mr. Quincy. The girls laid their
- proposition before him as clearly as they dared, by showing
- him what they had done in their lessons. ‘Very smart girls,
- unusually capable girls,’ he said encouragingly; ‘but can you
- cook?’ ‘Oh, yes, sir,’ said one, ‘we have kept house for some
- time.’ ‘Highly important,’ he said; and so on during the space
- of an hour.”
-
- Mrs. Livermore said she found he was toying with them and
- they were as far away from the subject in their minds as the
- moment they arrived, and, forgetting her promise of silence,
- she said: “‘But, Mr. Quincy, what we came to ask is, will you
- allow us to come to college when our brothers do? You say we
- are sufficiently prepared; is there anything to prevent our
- admission?’ ‘Oh, yes, my dear, we never allow girls at Harvard;
- you know, the place for girls is at home.’ ‘Yes, but, Mr.
- Quincy, if we are prepared, we would not ask to recite, but may
- we not attend the recitations and sit silent in the classes?’
- ‘No, my dear, you may not.’ ‘Then I wish—’ ‘What do you wish?’
- he said. ‘I wish I were God for one instant, that I might kill
- every woman from Eve down and let you have a masculine world
- all to yourselves and see how you would like that.’ Up to this
- point the girls had been kept up by excitement, but there we
- broke down. I tried the best I could not to cry, but I found
- my eyes were getting full, and the only thing for us to do
- was to leave as soon as we could for home. We lived in the
- vicinity of Copp’s Hill and I can see, as distinctly as if it
- were yesterday, the room looking out on the burial-ground in
- which we all sat down together and cried ourselves half-blind.
- ‘I wish I was dead,’ said one. ‘I wish I had never been born,’
- said another. ‘Martha, get up from that stone seat,’ said
- a third; ‘you’ll get cold.’ ‘I don’t care if I do,’ said
- Martha; ‘I shall perhaps die the sooner.’ We were all terribly
- indignant.”
-
- I was deeply interested in this history. I was standing over
- the cradle of woman’s emancipation and seeing it rocked by the
- hand of sorrow and indignation.
-
-Other passages might be cited merely to illustrate the skill and industry
-of Mrs. Fields in reducing to narrative form the mass of reported talk
-of one sort or another which her husband brought home to her. A striking
-instance of this is found in the full rendering of a story told by R. H.
-Dana, Jr., to Fields, at a time when they were discussing a new edition
-of “Two Years before the Mast.” It is a long dramatic account of Dana’s
-experience on a burning ship in the Pacific, which he told Fields he
-had “never yet found time to write down.” In Charles Francis Adams’s
-biography of Dana, the bare bones of the story are preserved in a diary
-Dana was keeping during the voyage in which this calamity occurred. If
-Adams could but have turned to the diary of Mrs. Fields for 1868, he
-would have found a detailed description of an episode in Dana’s life
-which might well have been included in his biography.
-
-[Illustration: _From a letter of Edward Lear’s to Fields_]
-
-But the _if’s_ of bookmaking are hardly less abundant than those of
-history. If, for a single instance, this were in any real sense a
-biography of Mrs. Fields, it would be necessary for the reader to explore
-with the compiler the journals and letters written during two visits the
-Fieldses made to Europe in 1859 and 1869. But this would be foreign to
-the present purpose, which has not been either to produce a biography,
-or to evoke all the interesting persons known to Mrs. Fields, at home
-and abroad, but rather to present them and her against her own intimate
-and distinctive background. She herself has written, in her “Authors and
-Friends,” of Tennyson and Lady Tennyson, and to the pictures she has
-drawn of them it would be easily possible to add fresh lines from the
-unprinted records—as it would be, also, to bring forth passages touching
-upon many another familiar figure of Victorian England. The roving lover
-who justified himself by singing that
-
- They were my visits, but thou art my home,
-
-stated, in essence, the principle to which these pages have adhered.
-The frequenters of the house in Charles Street well knew that something
-of its color and flavor was derived from the excursions its hostess
-made into other scenes. Yet her own color and flavor were not those of
-the visitor, but of the visited. It is a pity that many who would have
-been welcome visitors—none more than Edward Lear—never came. Even as it
-is, there is ample ground for laying the emphasis of this book upon the
-panorama of a picturesque social life chiefly as seen from within the
-hospitable walls of Mr. and Mrs. Fields. When he died in 1881, a long and
-happy chapter in her long and happy life came to its close.
-
-
-
-
-VII
-
-SARAH ORNE JEWETT
-
-
-Such a statement about Mrs. Fields as that she “was to survive her
-husband many years and was to flourish as a copious second volume—the
-connection licenses the figure—of the work anciently issued,” almost
-identifies itself, without remark, as proceeding from the same friend,
-Henry James, whose words have colored a previous chapter of this book.
-The many years to which he referred were, indeed, nearly thirty-four
-in number, about a third of a century, or what is commonly counted a
-generation. For a longer period than that through which she was the
-wife of James T. Fields, she was thus his widow. Through nearly all
-of this period the need of her nature for an absorbing affectionate
-intimacy was met through her friendship with Sarah Orne Jewett. It was
-with reference to her that Mrs. Fields, in the preface to a collection
-of Miss Jewett’s letters, published in 1911, two years after her death,
-wrote of “the power that lies in friendship to sustain the giver as well
-as the receiver.” In the friendship of these two women it would have
-been impossible to define either one, to the exclusion of the other, as
-the giver or the receiver. They were certainly both sustained by their
-relation.
-
-Miss Jewett, born in South Berwick, Maine, in 1849, and continuously
-identified with that place until her death in 1909, first entered the
-“Atlantic circle” in 1869, when she was but twenty years old, and Fields
-was still editor of the magazine. In that year a story by her, called
-“Mr. Bruce” and credited in the index of the magazine—for contributions
-then appeared unsigned—to “A. C. Eliot,” was printed in the “Atlantic.”
-Four years later, _Consule Howells_, “The Shore House,” a second story,
-appeared over her own name, the practice of printing signatures having
-meanwhile been instituted. In May, 1875, the “Atlantic” contained a poem
-by Miss Jewett, which may be quoted, not so much to remind the readers
-of those stories of New England on which her later fame was based, that
-in her earlier years she was much given to the writing of verse, as to
-explain in a way the union—there is no truer word for it—that came later
-to exist between herself and Mrs. Fields.
-
-Thus it read:—
-
- TOGETHER
-
- I wonder if you really send
- Those dreams of you that come and go!
- I like to say, “She thought of me,
- And I have known it.” Is it so?
-
- Though other friends walk by your side,
- Yet sometimes it must surely be,
- They wonder where your thoughts have gone,
- Because I have you here with me.
-
- And when the busy day is done
- And work is ended, voices cease,
- When every one has said good night,
- In fading firelight, then in peace
-
- I idly rest: you come to me,—
- Your dear love holds me close to you.
- If I could see you face to face
- It would not be more sweet and true;
-
- I do not hear the words you speak,
- Nor touch your hands, nor see your eyes:
- Yet, far away the flowers may grow
- From whence to me the fragrance flies;
-
- And so, across the empty miles
- Light from my star shines. Is it, dear,
- Your love has never gone away?
- I said farewell and—kept you here.
-
-[Illustration: SARAH ORNE JEWETT]
-
-It was not strange that the writer of just such a poem should have
-seemed to Fields, before his death in 1881, the ideal friend to fill the
-impending gap in the life of his wife. He must have known that, when the
-time should come for readjusting herself to life without him, she would
-need something more than random contacts with friends, no matter how
-rewarding each such relationship might be. He must have realized that
-the intensely personal element in her nature would require an outlet
-through an intensely personal devotion. If he could have foreseen the
-relation that grew up between Mrs. Fields and Miss Jewett—her junior by
-about fifteen years—almost immediately upon his death, and continued
-throughout the life of the younger friend, he would surely have felt a
-great security of satisfaction in what was yet to be. In all her personal
-manifestations, and in all her work, Miss Jewett embodied a quality of
-distinction, a quality of the true _aristophile_,—to employ a term
-which has seemed to me before to fit that small company of lovers of
-the best to which these ladies preëminently belonged,—that made them
-foreordained companions. To Mrs. Fields it meant much to stand in a
-close relation—apart from all considerations of a completely uniting
-friendship—with such an artist as Miss Jewett, to feel that through
-sympathy and encouragement she was furthering a true and permanent
-contribution to American letters. To Miss Jewett, whose life, before
-this intimacy began, had been led almost entirely in the Maine village
-of her birth,—a village of dignity and high traditions that were her
-own inheritance,—there came an extension of interests and stimulating
-contacts through finding herself a frequent member of another household
-than her own, and that a very nucleus of quickening human intercourse. To
-pursue her work of writing chiefly at South Berwick, to come to Boston,
-or Manchester, for that freshening of the spirit which the creative
-writer so greatly needs, and there to find the most sympathetic and
-devoted of friends, also much occupied herself with the writing of books
-and with all commerce of vital thoughts—what could have afforded a more
-delightful arrangement of life?
-
-[Illustration: THE LIBRARY IN CHARLES STREET; MRS. FIELDS AT THE WINDOW,
-MISS JEWETT AT THE RIGHT]
-
-Even as early as 1881, the year of Fields’s death, Miss Jewett published
-the fourth of her many books, “Country By-Ways,” preceded by “Deephaven”
-(1877), “Play Days” (1878), and “Old Friends and New” (1879). From 1881
-onward her production was constant and abundant. In 1881 also began a
-period of remarkable productiveness on the part of Mrs. Fields. In
-that very year of her husband’s death she published both her “James T.
-Fields: Biographical Notes and Personal Sketches,” and a second edition
-of “Under the Olive,” a small volume in which she had brought together in
-1880 a number of poems in which the influence of the Greek and English
-poets is sometimes manifested—notably in “Theocritus”—to excellent
-purpose. If Mrs. Fields had been a poet of distinctive power, the fact
-would long ago have established itself. To make any such claim for her
-at this late day would be to depart from the purpose of this book. It
-was for the most part rather as a friend than as a daughter of the Muses
-that she turned to verse, the medium of utterance for so many of that
-nest of singing-birds in which her life was passed. In 1883 came her
-little volume “How to Help the Poor,” representing an interest in the
-less fortunate which prepared her to become one of the founders of the
-Associated Charities of Boston, kept her long active and influential in
-the service of that organization, and made her at the last one of its
-generous benefactors. In 1895 and 1900, respectively, appeared two more
-volumes of verse, “The Singing Shepherd and Other Poems,” assembling the
-work of earlier and later years, and “Orpheus, a Masque,” each strongly
-touched, like “Under the Olive,” with the Grecian spirit. From “The
-Singing Shepherd” I cannot resist quoting one of the best things it
-contains—a sonnet, “Flammantis Mœnia Mundi,” under which, in my own copy
-of the book, I find the penciled note, written probably more than twenty
-years ago: “Mrs. Fields tells me that this sonnet came to her complete,
-one may almost say; standing on her feet she made it, but for one or two
-small changes, just as it is, in about fifteen minutes.”
-
- I stood alone in purple space and saw
- The burning walls of the world, like wings of flame,
- Circling the sphere; there was no break nor flaw
- In those vast airy battlements whence came
- The spirits who had done with time and fame
- And all the playthings of earth’s little hour;
- I saw them each, I knew them for the same,
- Mothers and brothers and the sons of power.
-
- Yet were they changed; the flaming walls had burned
- Their perishable selves, and there remained
- Only the pure white vision of the soul,
- The mortal part consumed, and swift returned
- Ashes to ashes; while unscathed, unstained,
- The immortal passed beyond the earth’s control.
-
-For the rest, her writings may be said to have grown out of the life
-which the pages of her diary have pictured. The successive volumes
-were these: “Whittier: Notes of his Life and of his Friendship” (New
-York, 1893); “A Shelf of Old Books” (New York, 1894); “Letters of Celia
-Thaxter” (edited with Miss Rose Lamb, Boston, 1895); “Authors and
-Friends” (Boston, 1896); “Life and Letters of Harriet Beecher Stowe”
-(Boston, 1897); “Nathaniel Hawthorne” (in the “Beacon Biographies,”
-Boston, 1899); “Charles Dudley Warner” (New York, 1909); and, after the
-death of the friend whose name appears above this chapter, “Letters of
-Sarah Orne Jewett” (Boston, 1911).
-
-[Illustration: _An autograph copy of Mrs. Fields’s “Flammantis Mœnia
-Mundi” before its final revision_]
-
-This catalogue of publications is in itself a dry bit of reading, and
-to add the titles of all the books produced by Miss Jewett after 1881
-would not enliven the record. But the lists, explicit and implicit, will
-serve at least to suggest the range and nature of the activities of mind
-and spirit in which the two friends shared for many years. It is no
-wonder that Mrs. Fields, who abandoned the regular maintenance of her
-diary in the face of her husband’s failing health, resumed it in later
-years only under the special provocations of travel. In its place she
-took up the practice of writing daily missives—sometimes letters, more
-often the merest notes—to Miss Jewett whenever they were separated.
-These innumerable little messages of affection contained frequent
-references to persons and passing events, but rather as memoranda for
-talk when the two friends should meet than as records at all resembling
-the earlier journals. Such local friends as Mrs. Pratt and Mrs. Bell,
-in whom the spirit and wit of their father, Rufus Choate, shone on for
-later generations; Mrs. Whitman, mistress of the arts of color and
-of friendship; Miss Guiney, figuring always as “the Linnet,” even as
-Mrs. Thaxter was “the Sandpiper”; Dr. Holmes, Phillips Brooks, “dear
-Whittier”—these and scores of others, young and old, known and unknown
-to fame, people the scene which the little notes recall. There are,
-besides, such visitors from abroad as Matthew Arnold and his wife, Mrs.
-Humphry Ward and her daughter, M. and Mme. Brunetière, and Mme. Blanc
-(“Th. Bentzon”), whose article, “Condition de la Femme aux États-Unis,”
-in the “Revue des Deux Mondes” for September, 1894, could not have been
-written but for the knowledge of Boston acquired through a long visit to
-the house in Charles Street. Of the salon of her hostess she wrote: “Je
-voudrais essayer de peindre celui qui se rapproche le plus, par beaucoup
-de côtés, les salons de France de la meilleure époque, le salon de Mrs.
-J. T. Fields.” She goes on to paint it, and from the picture at least one
-fragment—apropos of the portraits in the house—should be rescued, if only
-for the piquancy conferred by Mme. Blanc’s native tongue upon a bit of
-anecdote: “Emerson réalise bien, en physique, l’idée d’immatérialité que
-je me faisais de lui. Mrs. Fields me conte une jolie anecdote: vers la
-fin de sa vie, il fut prit d’un singulier accès de curiosité; il voulut
-savoir une fois ce que c’était le whisky et entra dans un bar pour s’en
-servir:—Vous voulez un verre d’eau, Mr. Emerson? dit le garçon, sans lui
-donner le temps d’exprimer sa criminelle envie. Et le philosophe but son
-verre d’eau, ... et il mourut sans connaître le goût du whisky.”
-
-[Illustration: MRS. FIELDS ON HER MANCHESTER PIAZZA]
-
-But if the notes of Mrs. Fields to Miss Jewett, and Miss Jewett’s own
-letters to her friend in Boston, do not provide any counterpart to the
-diaries which make up the greater portion of this book, there are, in the
-journals kept by Mrs. Fields on special occasions of travel, records of
-experiences shared by the two friends which should be given here.
-
-When they went to Europe together, as early as 1882, the two travellers
-were happily characterized by Whittier in a sonnet, “Godspeed,” as
-
- her in whom
- All graces and sweet charities unite
- The old Greek beauty set in holier light;
- And her for whom New England’s byways bloom,
- Who walks among us welcome as the Spring,
- Calling up blossoms where her light feet stray.
-
-No effort or adventure seemed to daunt the companions in their
-journeyings. There was an indomitable quality in Mrs. Fields which
-Miss Jewett used to ascribe to her “May blood,” with its strain of
-abolitionism, and it showed itself when she accepted with enthusiasm,
-and successfully urged Miss Jewett to accept, an invitation to make a
-two months’ winter cruise in West Indian waters, in company with Mr. and
-Mrs. Aldrich, on the yacht Hermione of their friend, Henry L. Pierce.
-The diary of Mrs. Fields records discomforts and pleasures with an equal
-hand, and gives lively glimpses of island and ocean scenes. At Santo
-Domingo, for example, the President of the Republic of Haiti dined on the
-Hermione on St. Valentine’s Day, 1896, and talked in a manner to which
-the impending liberation of Cuba from the Spanish yoke may now be seen to
-have added some significance.
-
- Anything more interesting than his conversation [wrote Mrs.
- Fields] would be impossible to find. He ended just before
- we left the table by speaking of Cuba. He is inclined to
- believe that the day of Spain is over. The people are already
- conquerors in the interior and are approaching Havana. Spain
- will soon be compelled to retire to her coast defenses and she
- is sure to be driven thence in two years or sooner. Of course,
- if the Cubans are recognized by the great powers they will
- triumph all the sooner.
-
- “Do these island republics take the part of Cuba?” someone
- asked.
-
- “I will tell you a little tale of a camel,” he said, “if you
- will allow me—a camel greatly overladen who lamented his sad
- fate. ‘I am bent to the earth,’ he said; ‘everything is heaped
- upon me and I feel as if I could never rise again under such a
- load.’ Upon his pack was seated a flea, who heard the lament
- of the camel. Immediately the flea jumped to the ground. ‘See!’
- he said; ‘now rise, I have relieved you of my own weight.’
- ‘Thank you, Mr. Elephant,’ said the camel, as he glanced at the
- flea hopping away. The recognition of these islands would help
- Cuba about as much,” he added laughingly.
-
-But the President of Haiti, concerning whom much more might be quoted, is
-less a part of the present picture than Thomas Bailey Aldrich, of whom
-Mrs. Fields wrote, February 21:—
-
- T. B. A.’s wit and pleasant company never fail—he is so
- natural, finding fault at times, without being a fault-finder,
- and being crusty like another human creature when out of
- sorts—but on the whole a most refreshing companion, coming
- up from below every morning with a shining countenance, his
- hair curling like a boy’s, and ready for a new day. He said
- yesterday that he should like to live 450 years—“shouldn’t
- you?” “No,” I said; “I am on tip-toe for the flight.” “Ah,”
- he said with a visible shudder, “we know nothing about it!
- Oddly enough, I have strange impressions of having lived
- before—once in London especially—not at St. Paul’s, or Pall
- Mall, or in any of the great places where I might have been
- deceived by previous imaginations,—not at all,—but among some
- old streets where I had never been before and where I had no
- associations.” He would have gone on in this vein and would
- have drawn me into giving some reasons for my faith which would
- have been none to him, but fortunately we were interrupted.
- He is full of quips and cranks in talk—is a worshipper of the
- English language and a good student of Murray’s Grammar, in
- which he faithfully believes. His own training in it he values
- as much as anything which ever came to him. He picks up the
- unfortunates, of which I am chief, who say “people” meaning
- “persons,” who say “at length” for “at last,” and who use
- foolish redundancies, but I cannot seem to record his fun. He
- began to joke Bridget early in the voyage about the necessity
- of being tattooed when she arrived at the Windward Islands,
- like the rest of the crew! Fancying that he saw a sort of half
- idea that he was in earnest, he kept it up and told her that
- the butter-mark of Ponkapog should be the device! The matter
- had nearly blown over when yesterday he wanted her suddenly and
- called, “Bridget,” at the gangway rather sharply. “Here, sir,”
- said the dear creature running quickly to mount the stairs.
- “The tattoo-man is here,” said T. B. With all seriousness
- Bridget paused a moment, wavered, looked again, and then came
- on laughing to do what he really wanted. “That man will be
- the death of me—so he will,” said B. as she went away on her
- errand. She is his slave; gets his clothes and waits upon him
- every moment; but his fun and sweetness with her “_désennuie de
- service_,” and more, charges it with pleasantness.
-
- T. B. A. is a most careful reader and a true reporter upon the
- few good books of which he is cognizant. He has read Froude’s
- history twice through, and Queen Mary’s reign three times. He
- has read a vast number of novels, hundreds and hundreds,—French
- and English,—but his knowledge of French seems to stop there.
- He also once knew Spanish, but that seems to have dropped—he
- never, I think, could speak much of any language save his
- own. Being a master there is so much more than the rest of us
- achieve that we feel he has won his laurels.
-
-On a later journey, in 1898, Mrs. Fields and Miss Jewett, visiting
-England and France in company with Miss Jewett’s sister and nephew, were
-on more familiar and more suitable ground—if indeed that word can be used
-even figuratively for the unstable deck of a yacht. In London there were
-many old and new friends to be seen. In Paris Mme. Blanc opened for the
-travellers the doors of many a salon not commonly accessible to visiting
-Americans. But from all the abundant chronicle of these experiences, it
-will be enough to make two selections. The first describes a visit to the
-Provençal poet, Mistral, with his “Boufflo Beel” dog and hat; the second,
-a glimpse of Henry James at Rye.
-
-[Illustration: MISTRAL, MASTER OF “BOUFFLO BEEL”]
-
-It was in May of 1898, that Mrs. Fields and Miss Jewett, finding Paris
-cold and rainy, determined to strike for sunshine, and the South. A
-little journey into Provence, and a visit to Mistral, followed this
-decision. The following notes record the visit.
-
- A perfect time and perfect weather in which to see the country
- of Provence. Fields of great white poppies and other flowers
- planted for seed in this district made the way beautiful on
- either hand. Olive trees with rows of black cypress and old
- tiled-roofed farmhouses, and the mountains always on the
- horizon, filled the landscape. The first considerable house
- we reached was the home of the poet. A pretty garden which
- attracted our attention with a rare eglantine called La Reine
- Joanne, and other charming things hanging over the wall made
- us suspicious of the poet’s vicinity. Turning the corner of
- this garden and driving up a short road, we found the courtyard
- and door on the inner side as it were. We heard a barking
- dog. “Take care,” said the driver, “there is a dangerous dog
- inside.” We waited until Mistral himself came to meet us from
- the garden; he was much amused. There was an old dog tied,
- half asleep, on a bench and a young one by his side. He said
- laughing, “These are all, and they could not be less dangerous.
- The elder” (he let them loose while he spoke and they played
- about us), “the elder I call Bouffe, from Boufflo Beel”
- (Mistral does not speak any English, nor does his wife) “and
- the reason is because I happened to be in the neighborhood of
- Paris once just after Buffalo Bill had passed on toward Calais
- with his troupe. I saw a little dog, unlike the dogs of our
- country, who seemed to be lost, but the moment he saw me, he
- thought I was ‘Boufflo Beel’ and adopted me for his master.
- You see I look like him,” he said, putting his wide felt hat
- a little more on one side! Yes, we did think so. “Well, the
- little dog has been with us ever since. He possesses the most
- wonderful intelligence and understands every word we say. One
- day I said to him, ‘What a pity such a nice dog as you should
- have no children!’ A few days later the servant said to me,
- ‘Bouffe has been away nearly two days, but he has now come
- back bringing his wife.’ ‘Ah!’ I said, ‘take good care of them
- both.’ In due time this other little dog, his son, arrived
- in the world, and shortly after Bouffe carried his wife away
- again, but kept the little dog. He is a wonderful fellow, to be
- sure.”
-
- We went into the house and sat down to talk awhile about poetry
- and books. There was a large book-case full of French and
- Provençal literature here, but it was rather the parlor and
- everyday sitting-room than his work-room. Unhappily, they have
- no children. Evidently they are exceedingly happy together and
- naturally do not miss what they have never had. She opened the
- drawing-room for us, which is the room of state. It is full
- of interesting things connected with Provence and their own
- life, but perfectly simple, in accord with the country-like
- fashion of their existence. There is a noble bas-relief of
- the head of Mistral, the drum or “tambour” of the Félibre, or
- for the Farandole, and, without overloading, plenty of good
- things—photographs, one or two pictures, not many, for the
- house is not that of a rich man, plaster casts, and one or
- two busts,—perhaps the presents of artists,—illustrations of
- “Mirèio,” and things associated with their individual lives
- or the life of Provence. Presently Mistral gave me his arm
- and we went across the hall. Standing in the place of honor
- opposite the front door and in the large corner made by the
- staircase, is a fine copy of the bust of Lamartine, crowned
- with an olive wreath. We paused a moment here while Mistral
- spoke of Lamartine, and always with the sincere reverence which
- he has expressed in the poem entitled “_Élégie sur la mort de
- Lamartine_.” ...
-
- The dining-room was still more Provençal, if possible, than the
- rooms we had visited. The walls were white, which, with the
- closed green blinds, must give a pleasant light when the days
- are hot, yet bright even on grey days. Specimens of the pottery
- of the country hang around, decorated with soft colors. The
- old carved bread-mixing-and-holding affair, which belonged in
- every well-to-do house of the old time, was there, and one or
- two other old pieces of furniture, while the chairs, sofa, and
- table were of quaint shape, painted green with some decorations.
-
- The details are all petty enough, but they proved how sincerely
- Mistral and his wife love their country and their surroundings
- and endeavor to ennoble them and make the most of them. After
- sitting at table and enjoying their hospitality, we went out
- again into the garden where Madame Mistral gathered “Nerto”
- (myrtle) for us, beside roses and other more beautiful but
- more formidable things. “Nerto” is the title of one of his
- last books (I hear) and the wife doubtless believed that we
- should cherish a branch of her myrtle especially in memory of
- the visit. She was quite right, but these things which are
- “to last”—how frail they are; the things that remain are those
- which are written on the heart.
-
- We cannot forget these two picturesque beings standing in their
- garden, filling our hands with flowers and bidding us farewell.
- As we drove away into the sunny plain once more, we found it
- speaking to us with a voice of human kindness echoing from
- that poetic and friendly home. In a more personal vein, the
- address to Lamartine by Mistral expresses better his mood of
- the afternoon when we stood together looking at the bust and
- recalling each our personal remembrance of the man.
-
-An excursion from London, on September 12, devoted to a day with Henry
-James, gave Mrs. Fields a memorable glimpse of the son of an old friend,
-and an honest pleasure in learning at first hand of his appreciation of
-Miss Jewett’s writings.
-
- _Monday, September 13, 1898._—We left London about 11 o’clock
- for Rye, to pass the day with Mr. Henry James. He was waiting
- for us at the station with a carriage, and in five minutes we
- found ourselves at the top of a silent little winding street,
- at a green door with a brass knocker, wearing the air of
- impenetrable respectability which is so well known in England.
- Another instant and an old servant, Smith (who with his wife
- has been in Mr. James’s service for 20 years), opened the door
- and helped us from the carriage. It was a pretty interior—large
- enough for elegance, and simple enough to suit the severe
- taste of a scholar and private gentleman.
-
- Mr. James was intent on the largest hospitality. We were asked
- upstairs over a staircase with a pretty balustrade and plain
- green drugget on the steps; everything was of the severest
- plainness, but in the best taste, “not at all austere,” as he
- himself wrote us.
-
- We soon went down again after leaving our hats, to find a
- young gentleman, Mr. McAlpine, who is Mr. James’s secretary,
- with him, awaiting us. This young man is just the person to
- help Mr. James. He has a bump of reverence and appreciates
- his position and opportunity. We sat in the parlor opening on
- a pretty garden for some time, until Mr. James said he could
- not conceive why luncheon was not ready and he must go and
- inquire, which he did in a very responsible manner, and soon
- after Smith appeared to announce the feast. Again a pretty room
- and table. We enjoyed our talk together sincerely at luncheon
- and afterward strolled into the garden. The dominating note was
- dear Mr. James’s pleasure in having a home of his own to which
- he might ask us. From the garden, of course, we could see the
- pretty old house still more satisfactorily. An old brick wall
- concealed by vines and laurels surrounds the whole irregular
- domain; a door from the garden leads into a paved courtyard
- which seemed to give Mr. James peculiar satisfaction; returning
- to the garden, and on the other side, at an angle with the
- house, is a building which he laughingly called the temple
- of the Muse. This is his own place _par excellence_. A good
- writing-table and one for his secretary, a typewriter, books,
- and a sketch by Du Maurier, with a few other pictures (rather
- mementoes than works of art), excellent windows with clear
- light, such is the temple! Evidently an admirable spot for his
- work.
-
-[Illustration: _Reduced facsimile of postscript of a letter from Henry
-James, expressing the intention, which he could not fulfill, to provide
-an Introduction to the “Letters of Sarah Orne Jewett”_]
-
- After we returned to the parlor Mr. James took occasion to
- tell Sarah how deeply and sincerely he appreciated her work;
- how he re-reads it with increasing admiration. “It is foolish
- to ask, I know,” he said, “but were you in just such a place
- as you describe in the ‘Pointed Firs’?” “No,” she said, “not
- precisely; the book was chiefly written before I visited
- the locality itself.” “And such an island?” he continued.
- “Not exactly,” she said again. “Ah! I thought so,” he said
- musingly; and the language—“It is so absolutely true—not a word
- overdone—such elegance and exactness.” “And Mrs. Dennet—how
- admirable she is,” he said again, not waiting for a reply. I
- need not say they were very much at home together after this.
-
- Meanwhile the carriage came again to the door, for he had made
- a plan to take us on a drive to Winchelsea, a second of the
- Cinq Portes, Rye itself also being one. The sea has retreated
- from both these places, leaving about two miles of the Romney
- Marsh between them and the shore. Nothing could be more
- like something born of the imagination than the old city of
- Winchelsea.... Just outside the old gate looking towards Rye
- and the sea from a lonely height is the cottage where Ellen
- Terry has found a summer resting-place and retirement. It is a
- true home for an artist—nothing could be lovelier. Unhappily
- she was not there, but we were happy to see the place which she
- described to us with so great satisfaction.
-
- From Winchelsea Mr. James drove us to the station, where we
- took the train for Hastings. He had brought his small dog, an
- aged black and tan terrier, with him for a holiday. He put on
- the muzzle, which all dogs just now must wear, and took it off
- a great many times until, having left it once when he went to
- buy the tickets and recovered it, he again lost it and it could
- not be found; so as soon as he reached Hastings, he took a
- carriage again to drive us along the esplanade, but the first
- thing was to buy a new muzzle. This esplanade is three miles
- long, but we began to feel like tea, so having looked upon
- the sea sufficiently from this decidedly unromantic point of
- view, we went into a small shop and enjoyed more talk under new
- conditions. “How many cakes have you eaten?” “Ten,” gravely
- replied Mr. James—at which we all laughed. “Oh, I know,” said
- the girl with a wise look at the desk. “How do you suppose they
- know?” said Mr. James musingly as he turned away. “They always
- do!” And so on again presently to the train at Hastings, where
- Mr. McAlpine appeared at the right instant. Mr. James’s train
- for Rye left a few moments before ours for London. He took a
- most friendly farewell and having left us to Mr. McA. ran for
- his own carriage. In another five minutes we too were away,
- bearing our delightful memories of this meeting.
-
-Not because they record momentous events and encounters, but merely
-as little pictures of the life which Mrs. Fields and Miss Jewett led
-together, these passages are brought to light. They are the last to be
-presented here. For more than another decade beyond the summer of 1898,
-Miss Jewett, sorely invalided through the final years as the result of a
-carriage accident, remained the central personal fact in Mrs. Fields’s
-interest and affections. Soon after her death, in June, 1909, Mrs. Fields
-wrote about her to a common friend: “Of my dear Sarah—I believe one of
-her noblest qualities was her great generosity. Others could only guess
-at this, but I was allowed to know it. Not that she made gifts, but a
-wide sympathy was hers for every disappointed or incompetent fellow
-creature. It was a most distinguishing characteristic! Governor Andrew
-spoke of Judge B—— once as ‘A friend to every man who did not need a
-friend’! Sarah’s quick sympathy knew a friend was in need before she knew
-it herself; she was the spirit of beneficence, and her quick delicate wit
-was such a joy in daily companionship!”
-
-Of this daily companionship an anonymous contributor to the “Atlantic
-Monthly” for August, 1909, had been a fortunate witness. I need not ask
-his permission to repeat a portion of what he then wrote:—
-
-“There is but one familiar portrait of Miss Jewett. It has been so
-often reprinted that many who have seen it, even without seeing her,
-must think of her as immune from change, blessed with perpetual youth,
-with a gracious, sympathetic femininity, with an air of breeding and
-distinction quite independent of shifting fashions.
-
-“This portrait is intimately symbolic of her work. It typifies with a
-rare faithfulness the quality of all the products of her pen. In them
-one found, and finds, the same abiding elements of beauty, sympathy, and
-distinction. The element of sympathy—perhaps the greatest of these—found
-its expression in a humor that provoked less of outward laughter than
-of smiles within, and in a pathos the very counterpart of this delicate
-quality. The beauty and the distinction may be less capable of brief
-characterization, but they pervaded her art....
-
-“This work of hers, in dealing with the New England life she knew and
-loved, was essentially American, as purely indigenous as the pointed firs
-of her own countryside. The art with which she wrought her native themes
-was limited, on the contrary, by no local boundaries. At its best it had
-the absolute quality of the highest art in every quarter of the globe.
-And the spirit in which she approached her task was as broad in its
-scope and sympathy as her art in its form. It was precisely this union
-of what was at once so clearly American and so clearly universal that
-distinguished her stories, in the eyes of both editor and reader, as the
-best—so often—in any magazine that contained them.
-
-“Her constant demand upon herself was for the best. There were no
-compromises with mediocrity, either in her tastes or in her achievements.
-It was the best aspect of New England character and tradition on which
-her vision steadily dwelt. She was satisfied with nothing short of the
-best in her interpretation of New England life. The form of creative
-writing in which she won her highest successes—the short story—is the
-form in which Americans have made their most distinctive contributions
-to English literature: and her place with the few best of these writers
-appears to be secure.
-
-“If the familiar portrait typifies her work, it is equally true to the
-person herself. The quick, responsive spirit of youth, with all its
-sincerity, all its enjoyment in friendship or whatever else the day
-might hold, was an immutable possession. So were all the other qualities
-for which the features spoke. Through the recent years of physical
-disability, due in the first instance to an accident so gratuitous that
-it seemed to her friends unendurable, there was a noble patience, a
-sweet endurance, that could have sprung only from an heroic strain of
-character.”
-
-For nearly six years Mrs. Fields survived Miss Jewett, bereaved as by the
-loss of half her personal world, yet indomitable of spirit and energy,
-so long as her physical forces would permit any of the old accustomed
-exercises of hospitality and friendship. The selection and publication
-of Miss Jewett’s letters was a labor of love which continued the sense
-of companionship for the first two of the remaining years. Through the
-four others there was a failing of bodily strength, though not at all of
-mental and spiritual eagerness; and in her outward mien through all the
-later years, there was that which must have recalled to many the ancient
-couplet:—
-
- No Spring, nor summer’s beauty hath such grace
- As I have seen in one autumnal face.
-
-Towards the end there was a brief return to the keeping of a sporadic
-diary. Its final words, written January 25, 1913, were these: “The days
-go on cheerfully. I have just read Mark Twain’s life, the life of a man
-who had greatness in him. I am now reading his ‘Joan of Arc.’ I hope to
-wait as cheerfully as he did for the trumpet call and as usefully, but I
-am ready.”
-
-When Mrs. Fields died and the Charles Street door was finally closed, at
-the beginning of 1915, the world had entered upon its first entire year
-of a new era. It is an era as sharply separated from that of her intimate
-contemporaries, the American Victorians, as any new from any old order.
-The figures of every old order take their places by degrees as “museum
-pieces,” objects of curious and sometimes condescending study. But let
-us not be too sure that in parting with the past we have let it keep
-only that which can best be spared. We would not wish them back, those
-Victorians of ours. They were the product of their own day, and would be
-hardly at ease—poor things—in our twentieth-century Zion. Even some of us
-who inhabit it gain a sense of rest in reëntering their quiet, decorous
-dwelling-places. As we emerge again from one of them, may it be with a
-renewed allegiance to those lasting “things that are more excellent,”
-which belong to every generation of civilized men and women.
-
-
-
-
-FOOTNOTES
-
-
-[1] _A Shelf of Old Books_, by Mrs. Fields (1894), pictures many aspects
-of the house and its contents.
-
-[2] About two months later, Mrs. Fields wrote in her diary: “Emerson
-says Hawthorne’s book is ‘pellucid but not deep.’ He has cut out the
-dedication and letter, as others have done.”
-
-[3] The greater part of this chapter appeared in the _Yale Review_ for
-April, 1918.
-
-[4] George Tyler Bigelow, of the Harvard Class of 1829.
-
-[5] Harvard festivals were frequently noted. After the great day on which
-Lowell gave his _Commemoration Ode_, Mrs. Fields wrote (July 22, 1865):
-“What an ever-memorable day, the one at Harvard! The prayer of Phillips
-Brooks, the ode of Lowell, the address of Dr. Putnam and the Governor,
-and the heartfelt verses of Holmes, and the lovely music and the hymns.
-But Lowell’s Ode!! How it overtops the whole of what is preserved on
-paper beside! Charles G. Loring presided. ‘Awkwardly enough done,’ said
-O. W. H.; ‘It is a delicate thing to introduce a poet, he should be
-delivered to the table as a falconer delivers the falcon into the air,
-but Mr. Loring puts you down hard on the table—ca-chunk.’”
-
-[6] This anecdote of the revision of _The Last Leaf_, written in 1831, is
-told a little differently in the annotations of Holmes’s Complete Works.
-
-[7] See _Yesterdays with Authors_, p. 98, and _The Atlantic Monthly and
-Its Makers_, p. 46.
-
-[8] _The Dolliver Romance._
-
-[9] Fields drew upon this paragraph for one in _Yesterdays with Authors_,
-p. 112.
-
-[10] Only a month after making this entry, Mrs. Fields wrote in her
-journal: “A note came from Longfellow saying he had received a sad note
-from Hawthorne. ‘I wish we could have a little dinner for him,’ he says,
-‘of two sad authors and two jolly publishers—nobody else.’”
-
-[11] In Rose Hawthorne Lathrop’s _Memories of Hawthorne_ the relation
-between the two households is indicated in a sentence containing
-the nicknames of Mr. and Mrs. Fields: “My father also tasted the
-piquant flavors of merriment and luxury in this exquisite domicile of
-Heart’s-Ease and Mrs. Meadows.”
-
-[12] Thoreau’s younger sister.
-
-[13] In 1865 Alcott printed privately and anonymously the essay,
-_Emerson_, which appeared later in his acknowledged volume, _Ralph Waldo
-Emerson, an Estimate of his Character and Genius_ (Boston, 1882). This
-was evidently _The Rhapsodist_.
-
-[14] Thoreau’s older sister.
-
-[15] Josiah Phillips Quincy.
-
-[16] An allusion to the controversy over the claims of Dr. Jackson and
-Dr. Morton to the discovery of ether.
-
-[17] Daughter of the Rev. William Henry Furness, of Philadelphia, and
-translator of German novels.
-
-[18] One of Lowell’s reminiscences at the Saturday Club, recorded two
-years earlier by Mrs. Fields, suggests his essential youthfulness of
-spirit. Apropos of a story told by Dr. Holmes, “Lowell said that reminded
-him of experiments the boys at his school used to make on flies, to see
-how much weight they could carry. One day he attached a thread, which he
-pulled out of his silk handkerchief, to a fly’s leg, and to the other
-end a bit of paper with ‘the master is a fool’ written on it in small
-distinct letters. The fly flew away and lighted on the master’s nose; but
-he, regardless of all but the lessons, brushed him off, and the fly rose
-with his burden to the ceiling.”
-
-[19] After an evening of high discussion at Mrs. Howe’s in an earlier
-year, Mrs. Fields wrote in her journal (October 4, 1863): “The talk grew
-deep, and after it was over, she [Mrs. Howe] recalled the saying of Mrs.
-Bell, after a like evening, when she called for ‘a fat idiot.’”
-
-[20] If Mrs. Fields had lived to see _The Early Years of the Saturday
-Club_ (Boston, 1918), she would have found that I drew from the notes in
-her own diary a large portion of the memoir of James T. Fields which it
-contains.
-
-[21] This was in the midst of Aldrich’s occupancy of Elmwood, during
-Lowell’s two years’ absence in Europe.
-
-[22] The greater part of this chapter appeared in _Harper’s Magazine_ for
-May and June, 1922.
-
-[23] A few passages from it, relating to Dickens, are included in _James
-T. Fields: Biographical Notes and Personal Sketches_. When they are
-occasionally repeated here, it is in their original form, and not as Mrs.
-Fields edited them for publication.
-
-[24] On this very day Lowell wrote in the course of a letter to Fields:
-“James tells me you had a tremendous _queue_ this morning. Don’t fail
-to get me tickets, and for the first night. I should like to see his
-reception. It will leave a picture on the brain. And why should I not be
-there to welcome him, as well as Tom, Dick, or Harry?”
-
-[25] Even after Dickens’s return to England, his sayings found their way
-into Mrs. Fields’s journal; as, for example:—
-
-“_July 4, 1868._—J. made me laugh this morning (it was far too hot to
-laugh) by telling me that Dickens said of Gray, the poet, ‘No man ever
-walked down to posterity with so small a book under his arm!’”
-
-[26] See Forster’s _Life_, III, 368, for the same story told by Dickens
-in a letter to Lord Lytton, without naming Longfellow as the narrator.
-
-[27] In _Yesterdays with Authors_ (see pp. 230-31), Fields made use, with
-revisions and omissions, of this portion of his wife’s diary.
-
-[28] Mrs. Stowe’s unhappily historic article on “The True Story of Lady
-Byron’s Life” appeared in the _Atlantic Monthly_ for September, 1869.
-
-[29] On April 20, 1870, Longfellow wrote to Fields (See _Life of Henry
-Wadsworth Longfellow_, etc., edited by Samuel Longfellow, III, 148):—
-
-“Some English poet has said or sung:
-
- ‘At the close of the day, when the hamlet is still,
- And mortals the sweets of forgetfulness prove.’
-
-“I wish Hamlet would be still! I wish I could prove the sweets of
-forgetfulness! I wish Fechter would depart into infinite space, and
-‘leave, oh, leave me to repose!’ When will this disturbing star
-disappear, and suffer the domestic planetary system to move on in the
-ordinary course and keep time with the old clock in the corner?”
-
-[30] A contemporary definition of Cincinnati.
-
-[31] Dr. J. Baxter Upham, the moving spirit in the building of the Music
-Hall and the installation of the organ. He presided at its dedication.
-
-[32] See _ante_, page 111.
-
-[33] “A Newport Romance,” published in the _Atlantic Monthly_ for
-October, 1871.
-
-[34] Probably _Gabriel Conroy_ and _Two Men of Sandy Bar_.
-
-[35] See _The Atlantic Monthly and Its Makers_, pp. 73-75.
-
-
-
-
-INDEX
-
-
-Page numbers set in =bold-faced type= indicate, generally speaking, the
-more important references to the persons concerned. As a complete list
-of the pages on which Mr. or Mrs. Fields, or both, are mentioned would
-include substantially the whole book, only a few of the more significant
-references to them have been selected for inclusion under their names.
-
- Adams, Annie, marries =J. T. F.=, 11. And _see_ Fields, Annie.
-
- Adams, Charles F., Jr., 278.
-
- Adams, Lizzie, 20.
-
- Adams, Zabdiel B., 11.
-
- Agassiz, Alexander, 256, 257, 258.
-
- Agassiz, Elizabeth C., 159.
-
- Agassiz, Louis, 48, 93, 105, 141.
-
- Alcott, A. Bronson, 63, =72-77=, 81, 82, 95.
-
- Alcott, Mrs. A. Bronson, 63.
-
- Alcott, Louisa M., 73.
-
- Alden, Henry M., 57, 89.
-
- Aldrich, Lilian (Woodman), 126, 203, 229, 290.
-
- Aldrich, Thomas B., 11, 116, 126 and _n._, 127, =197= _ff._,
- =226-229=, 290, =291-293=.
-
- Andrew, John A., 11, 36 _n._, 302.
-
- Andrew, Mrs. John A., 28, 213, 214.
-
- Appleton, Thomas Gold, 115, 116, 126, 152, 154, 209, 211, 212,
- 213, 216, 246, 253.
-
- Aristotle, 133.
-
- Arnold, Matthew, 288.
-
- Astor, John Jacob, 76, 77.
-
- _Atlantic Monthly_, 6, 13, 14, 107, 111, 191 _n._, 209, 233,
- 252, 281, 282, 302.
-
-
- Bacon, Francis, Lord, 112.
-
- Baker, Sir Samuel, 149.
-
- Barbauld, Anna L. A., 101.
-
- Barker, Fordyce, 151, 185.
-
- Barlow, Francis C., 61.
-
- Barrett, Lawrence, 240.
-
- Bartol, Cyrus A., 114, 215, 239.
-
- Beal, James H., 143.
-
- Beal, Louisa (Adams), 42, 143.
-
- Beal, Thomas, 199.
-
- Beecher, Henry Ward, 89, 224, 263, =267-269=, 270.
-
- Bell, Helen (Choate), 98, 143, 288.
-
- Bellows, Henry W., 199.
-
- Bentzon, Th. _See_ Blanc, Marie T.
-
- Bigelow, George T., 36.
-
- Bigelow, Mr. and Mrs., 143, 144.
-
- Blagden, Isa, 260.
-
- Blake, Harrison G. O., 89, 90.
-
- Blanc, Marie Thérèse, 288, 289, 293.
-
- Blessington, Countess of, 274.
-
- Blumenbach, Johann F., 128, 129.
-
- Boccaccio, Giovanni, 58.
-
- Booth, Edwin, 28, =198-203=, 210, =240-241=.
-
- Booth, J. Wilkes, 28, 198, 199.
-
- Booth, Junius Brutus, 196.
-
- Booth, Mary (Mrs. Edwin), 241.
-
- Booth, Mary A. (Mrs. J. B.), 198.
-
- Boswell, James, 60.
-
- Boutwell, George S., 89.
-
- Bradford, George, 81, 82, 90.
-
- Bright, John, 177.
-
- Brontë, Charlotte, 131, 266.
-
- Brooks, Phillips, 36 _n._, 94, 288.
-
- Brown, John, _Pet Marjorie_, 59.
-
- Browne, Charles F., 21.
-
- Brownell, Henry Howard, 29.
-
- Browning, Elizabeth Barrett, 270.
-
- Browning, Robert, 43, 142, 260, 269.
-
- Brunetière, Ferdinand, 288.
-
- Bryant, William Cullen, 239, 257.
-
- “Buffalo Bill.” _See_ Cody, W. F.
-
- Bugbee, James M., 126.
-
- Bull, Ole, 225.
-
- Burr, Aaron, 270, 271.
-
- Butler, Benjamin F., 95.
-
-
- Cabot, Mrs., 236.
-
- Calderon de la Barca, Pedro, 110.
-
- Carleton, G. W., 233.
-
- Carlyle, Jane Welsh, 75, 142, 220.
-
- Carlyle, Thomas, 73, 75, 79, 89, 141, 142, 165, 167, 190, 191,
- 220.
-
- Channing, W. Ellery, 81, 98, 114.
-
- Cheney, Arthur, 216.
-
- Cheney, Ednah D., 114.
-
- Child, Lydia M., 265, 266.
-
- Childs, George W., 64.
-
- Choate, Rufus, 288.
-
- Cicero, 45.
-
- Clapp, Henry, 185.
-
- Clarke, James Freeman, 72, 114.
-
- Clarke, Sara, 205.
-
- Clemens, Samuel L., 232, 233, =244-257=, 305.
-
- Clemens, Mrs. S. L., 245 _ff._
-
- Cobden, Richard, 177.
-
- Cody, William F., 294.
-
- Colchester (medium), 168, 169, 170.
-
- Collins, Charles, 168.
-
- Collins, Mrs. Charles (daughter of Dickens), 190.
-
- Collins, W. Wilkie, 145, 189.
-
- Collyer, Robert, 215.
-
- Conway, Judge, 219.
-
- Cooke, George W., 120.
-
- Crabbe, George, 186.
-
- Crawford, Thomas, 264.
-
- Crawford, Mrs. Thomas, 264, 265.
-
- Cubas, Isabella, 22, 23.
-
- Curtis, George William, 14, 33, =184=, 188.
-
- Curtis, Mrs. G. W., 14.
-
- Cushing, Caleb, 266, 267.
-
- Cushman, Charlotte, 123, =219-222=.
-
-
- Dana, Charlotte, 161.
-
- Dana, Richard H., Jr., 93, 95, 116, 144, 250, 278.
-
- Dana, Mrs. R. H., Jr. 92, 93.
-
- Dana, Sallie, 161.
-
- Daniel, George, 95.
-
- Dante Alighieri, 258.
-
- Davidson, Edith, 99.
-
- Davis, George T., 19, 20.
-
- Dennet, of the _Nation_, 127.
-
- De Normandie, James, 81.
-
- Dewey, Dr., 219.
-
- Dickens, Bessy, 194.
-
- Dickens, Catherine (Hogarth), 160.
-
- Dickens, Charles, in America, 138-188; his readings, 140, 144,
- 145, 152, 157, 171, 172, 181, 182; letters of, to =J. T. F.=,
- 150, 191; 12, 32, 33, 118, 119, 120, =135-195=, 209, 210, 211,
- 212, 223, 240.
-
- Dickens, Charles, Jr., 194.
-
- Dickens, John, 175.
-
- Dickens, Mary: quoted, 193; 140, 164, 169, 194.
-
- Dickinson, Lowes, 232.
-
- Dodge, Mary Abigail, 144, 220, 221.
-
- Dolby, George, 136, 138, 139, 140, 143, 144, 149, 150, 161,
- 162, 165, 166, 171, 173, 178, 180, 185, 189, 190.
-
- Donne, Father, 102.
-
- Donne, John, 95.
-
- Dorr, Charles, 149, 209.
-
- Dorr, Mrs. Charles, 35, 149, 150, 209, 215.
-
- Dryden, John, 109.
-
- Dufferin, Earl of, 163.
-
- Dumas, Alex., 211.
-
- Dumas, Alex., _fils._, 211.
-
- Du Maurier, George, 300.
-
- Dunn, Rev. Mr., 122.
-
-
- Ecce Homo, 167.
-
- Eliot, Charles W., 41.
-
- Eliotson, Dr., 182, 183.
-
- Ellsler, Fanny, 24.
-
- Emerson, Edith, 89, 91. And _see_ Forbes, Edith (Emerson).
-
- Emerson, Edward W., 94, 103, 104.
-
- Emerson, Ellen, 88, 94, 96, 97, 99, 100, 103, 104.
-
- Emerson, Lilian (Jackson), letter of, to =Mrs. F.=, 88; 61, 62,
- 89, 94, 95, 99, 101, 203.
-
- Emerson, Ralph Waldo, letter of, to =J. T. F.=, 87; 14, 15
- _n._, 24, 61, 62, 67, 73, 74, 79, 83, 84, =86-105=, 130, 131,
- 141, =158=, 161, 165, 203, 206, 238, 239, =289=.
-
- Emerson, W. R., 219.
-
- England, Hawthorne on, 59, 60.
-
- Everett, Edward, 116, 270, 271.
-
- Everett, William, 270.
-
- _Every Saturday_, 197.
-
-
- Falstaff, Sir John, 110.
-
- Fechter, Charles, 139, 146, 148, 149, 159, 179, 190, 191, =209=
- _ff._
-
- Field, John W., 124.
-
- Field, Kate, 152, 259, 260, 261.
-
- Fielding, Henry, _Tom Jones_, 110, 111.
-
- Fields, Annie, disposition of her papers, 3; her Journals, 4,
- 12; H. James quoted on, 5; marriage, 11; her neighbors, 11;
- and Leigh Hunt, 15, 16; letter of Holmes to, on her memorial
- volume, 50, 51; her books, 53; H. James, Sr., quoted on,
- 85; “Thunderbolt Hill,” 101; her character as revealed in
- her diary, 132-134; her championship of Dickens, 156, 157;
- the variety of her friendships, 196 _ff._; her ode for the
- installation of the Music Hall organ, 219, 220, 221; with =J.
- T. F.=, visits Mark Twain at Hartford, 246 _ff._; and the cause
- of equal rights for women, 275, 278; her skill in digesting
- reports of conversations, 279, 280; her intimate friendship
- with Miss Jewett, 281 _ff._; her poetry, 285, 286; list of her
- published prose works, 286; friends of her later years, 288;
- travelling with Miss Jewett, 289 _ff._; and the President of
- Haiti, 290, 291; visits Mistral, 293-297; visits H. James, Jr.,
- at Rye, 297-301; quoted, on Miss Jewett, 302; her last years,
- 301, 305; the last words in her diary, 305; her death, 305.
- _James T. Field: Biographical Notes_, 4, 13, 16, 50; _Authors
- and Friends_, 4, 31, 86, 87, 105, 129, 134, 279; _A Shelf of
- Old Books_, 12 _n._; _Hawthorne_, 54.
-
- Fields, Eliza J. (Willard), 11.
-
- FIELDS, JAMES T., early days in Boston, 10, 11, 196; marries
- Annie Adams, 11; their home on Charles St., 11, 12, 137, 138,
- 218, 219; editor of the _Atlantic_, 14, 58, 67, 87, 107, 111,
- 119, 191 _n._, 233, 282; as _raconteur_, 21; Holmes quoted on
- his position in the literary world, 34; retires from business,
- 40; H. James, Sr., quoted on, 85; his love of the theatre and
- stage folk, 196, 197; his death, 280; fosters =Mrs. F.’s=
- friendship with Miss Jewett, 283. _Yesterdays with Authors_, 4,
- 54, 55, 62, 137, 176 _n._, 190.
-
- Fields, Osgood & Co., 10.
-
- Fiske, John, 48.
-
- Forbes, Edith (Emerson), 91.
-
- Forbes, William H., 91.
-
- Forrest, Edwin, 207, 218.
-
- Forrest, Mrs. Edwin, 218.
-
- Forster, John, 154, 160, 163, 171, 213.
-
- Foster, Charlotte, 259.
-
- Frothingham, Octavius B., 274.
-
- Froude, James A., 68, 293.
-
- Fuller, Margaret, 24, 239.
-
- Fulton, J. D., 122.
-
- Furness, William H., 101 _n._, 102, 103.
-
-
- Garrett (impressario), 214.
-
- Gaskell, Elizabeth C. S., 131.
-
- Godwin, Mrs. William, 16.
-
- Goethe, Johann W. von, _Wilhelm Meister_, 132, 133.
-
- Gorges, Sir F., 74.
-
- Gounod, Charles, 44.
-
- Grant, Julia Dent, 159.
-
- Grant, Ulysses S., 159, 262.
-
- Grau, Maurice, 222.
-
- Greene, George W., 19, 20, 44, 45, 47, 126, 141, 256, 258, 260.
-
- Gregory, Lady, 218.
-
- Guiney, Louise Imogen, 288.
-
-
- Haiti, President of, 290, 291.
-
- Hale, Edward E., 93.
-
- Hale, John P., 261.
-
- Hallam, Henry, 89.
-
- Hamilton, Gail. _See_ Dodge, Mary Abigail.
-
- Hammersley, Mr., 247.
-
- _Harper’s Weekly_, 14.
-
- Harris, William T., 81.
-
- Harte, F. Bret, 117, =233-243=.
-
- Harte, Mrs. F. B., 239, 240.
-
- Harvard College, Commemoration Day at, 36 _n._
-
- Hawthorne, Julian, 15, 144.
-
- Hawthorne, Nathaniel, death of, 27, 28, 67; letters of, to =J.
- T. F.=, 54, 55, 56; his last letter, 65-67; =13=, =14=, =15=
- and _n._, =18=, 19, 30, 32, 33, =54-72=, 97, =105=, 127, =236=.
-
- Hawthorne, Sophia (Peabody), letter to =Mrs. F.= on Hawthorne,
- 70-72; 61, 65, 66, 67, 68, 91, 144, 246.
-
- Hawthorne, Una, 15, 97, 221.
-
- Hawthorne, E. M., sister of Nathaniel, 69.
-
- Hayes, Isaac I., 33, 34.
-
- Herbert, George, 95.
-
- Herrick, Robert, 95.
-
- Higginson, Thomas W., 114.
-
- Hill, Thomas, 92.
-
- Hillard, George S. 17, 18, 19, 143.
-
- Hoar, Ebenezer R., 37, 90, 91, 141.
-
- Hogarth, Georgina, quoted, 193, 194; 140, 155, 165, 195.
-
- Holmes, Amelia (Jackson), 30, 34, 39, 40, 41, 51, 153, 203,
- 213, 214, 221.
-
- Holmes, Oliver Wendell, his relations with the Fieldses,
- generally, =17-52=; letters of, to =J. T. F.=, 17, 49, and to
- =Mrs. F.=, 50; 11, 13, 54, 90, 94, 96, 110, 111 _n_., 115, 116,
- 117, 118, 135, 141, 142, 203, 205, 206, 207, 208, 221, 256,
- 257, 273, 288.
-
- Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr., 21, 31.
-
- Home (medium), 163, 168.
-
- Horace, 238.
-
- Howe, Julia Ward, =9=, =10=, 61, 90, 114 and _n._, 221.
-
- Howe, Laura (Mrs. Richards), 150.
-
- Howe, Samuel G., 219, 273.
-
- Howells, William D., 38, 116, 166.
-
- Howes, Miss, 236.
-
- Howison, George H., 81.
-
- Hunt, Henry, 48.
-
- Hunt, Leigh, 15, 16, 58, 122.
-
- Hunt, T. Sterry, 199.
-
- Hunt, William M., 96, =97-99=, =230=, =232=.
-
- Hunt, Mrs. W. M., 96, 98, 222, 230.
-
- Hyacinthe, Père, 44.
-
-
- Ingelow, Jean, 142.
-
-
- Jackson, Charles T., 94 and _n._
-
- James, Alice, 77, 81, 83.
-
- James, George Abbot, 42.
-
- James, Henry, Sr., letter of, to =J. T. F.=, 82, and to =Mrs.
- F.=, 83, 85; =72-85=.
-
- James, Mrs. Henry, 75, 77, 81.
-
- James, Henry, Jr., quoted, 6, 7, 137, 281; letter of, to
- author, 8, 9; 119, 120, =297-301=.
-
- Jan (Booth’s servant), 200, 202.
-
- Jefferson, Joseph, =203-208=, 247.
-
- Jewett, Sarah Orne, her intimate relations with =Mrs. F.=, 281
- _ff._, 302-304; her early days, 281, 282; her literary work,
- 282-284; correspondence with =Mrs. F.=, 288, 289; H. James on
- her work, 300; her death, 302; 12, 50.
-
- Johnson, Andrew, impeachment of, 159; 261, 262, 263.
-
- Johnson, Samuel, 60.
-
- Jonson, Ben, 96.
-
- Julius Cæsar, 45.
-
-
- Keats, John, 43, 68, 206, 207.
-
- Kellogg, Elijah, 271, 272.
-
- Kemble, Charles, 196.
-
- Kemble, Frances Anne, 196, 222, 223, 224
-
- Kennard, Mr., 267, 268.
-
- King, Preston, 262, 263.
-
- Kirkup, Seymour S., 258.
-
- Knowlton, Helen M., 232.
-
-
- Lamartine, Alphonse de, 296, 297.
-
- Lamb, Charles, 270.
-
- Landor, Walter Savage, 259-261.
-
- Langdon, Mr., Mark Twain’s father-in-law, 245.
-
- Langdon, Mrs., 246.
-
- Larcom, Lucy, 70.
-
- Lathrop, George P., 97.
-
- Lathrop, Rose (Hawthorne), quoted, 67 _n._; 97, 144.
-
- Lear, Edward, 280.
-
- Leclercq, Carlotta, 216.
-
- Lemaître, Frédérick, 178, 179, 180, 211.
-
- Lincoln, Abraham, assassination of, 28, 198; 55, 56, 77, 262,
- 263.
-
- Livermore, Mary A., 275-278.
-
- Locke, David R., 33.
-
- Longfellow, Alice, 42, 96, 224.
-
- Longfellow, Charles, 128, 216.
-
- Longfellow, Edith, 42, 213, 214.
-
- Longfellow, Mrs. Ernest W., 42.
-
- Longfellow, Henry W., 13, 19, 33, 34, =35=, 39, 42, 43, =44=,
- 45, 46, 47, 48, =60= and _n._, 90, 96, =97=, 98, 99, 109, 115,
- 116, =117=, =119=, 123, 124, =125=, =126=, 127, =128=, =129=,
- 141, 144, 152, =153=, =159=, =160=, =161=, 172, 205, 206, 207,
- =208=, 209, 211, =212= and _n._, =213=, =214=, =215=, 216,
- =222=, =223=, 224, =243=, 256, 257, 258, 273.
-
- Longfellow, Mrs. H. W., 55, 223.
-
- Longfellow, Samuel, 42, 212 _n._
-
- Loring, Charles G., 36 _n._
-
- Lowell, Frances (Dunbar), 123, 124.
-
- Lowell, James Russell, letters of, to =J. T. F.=, 107, 108,
- 112, 113, 120, 141 _n._; =5=, 13, =33=, 34, 35, =36= _n._,
- =90=, =92=, =93=, =94=, =95=, 104, =105=, =106=, =107= _ff._,
- 116, =117=, =123=, =124=, 126, 127, =149=, 159, 163, 164, 166,
- 243, 273.
-
- Lowell, Mabel, 107, 113, 123, 124, 149.
-
- Lunt, George, 214.
-
- Luther, Martin, 89.
-
- Lytton, Edward Bulwer, Lord, 168, 176, 177.
-
-
- Macready, William, 218.
-
- Maistre, Joseph de, 221.
-
- Mars, Anne F. H., 210, 211.
-
- Mathews, Charles, 207.
-
- Merivale, Herman, 95.
-
- Miller, Joaquin, 43, 126.
-
- Milton, John, 74.
-
- Mistral, Frédéric, 293-297.
-
- Mistral, Mme. Frédéric, 295, 296, 297.
-
- Mitchell, Donald G., 185.
-
- Mitford, Mary R., 98.
-
- Montaigne, Michel de, 112, 238, 239.
-
- Morton, W. T. G., 94 and _n._
-
- Motley, J. Lothrop, 37.
-
- Mott, Lucretia C., 74.
-
- Murdoch, James E., 217, 218.
-
- Music Hall, Boston, great organ in, 219, 220, 221.
-
-
- “Nasby, Petroleum V.” _See_ Locke, D. R.
-
- Nichol, Professor, 90.
-
- Nilsson, Christine, 214, =224-226=.
-
- Norton, Caroline (Sheridan), 46.
-
- Norton, Charles Eliot, 92, 103, 104, 141, 144, 172, 185, 187.
-
- Norton, Mrs. C. E., 163.
-
-
- O’Brien, Fitz-James, 227-229.
-
- O’Connell, Daniel, 173, 176, 177.
-
- Orsay, Count d’, 145.
-
- Osgood, James R., 116, 136, 151, 153, 161, 162, 165, 166, 167,
- 185.
-
-
- Parker, Harvey D., 206.
-
- Parkman, Francis, 104, 105.
-
- Parkman, Mrs. Francis, 35.
-
- Parkman, George, murder of, 153.
-
- Parsons, Thomas W., 208, 214.
-
- Parton, James, 110, 111, 232.
-
- Peabody, Elizabeth, 82, 119.
-
- Pedro, Dom, Emperor of Brazil, 127, 128.
-
- Perabo, Ernst, 224.
-
- Phelps, Elizabeth Stuart, 275.
-
- Phi Beta Kappa, Harvard (1868), 36, 37; 92.
-
- Phillips, Wendell, 89, 114.
-
- Phipps, Colonel, 188, 189.
-
- Pickwick, Mr., 111.
-
- Pierce, Franklin, Hawthorne’s loyalty to, 13, 14, 15; 57, 58,
- 67.
-
- Pierce, Mrs. Franklin, death of, 57, 58.
-
- Pierce, Henry L., 229, 290.
-
- Poore, Ben Perle, 266.
-
- Pratt, Mrs. Ellerton, 288.
-
- Prescott, Harriet (Mrs. Spofford), 58.
-
- Putnam, George, 36 _n._, 213.
-
- Putnam, John P., 221.
-
-
- Quincy, Edmund, 86, 273.
-
- Quincy, Josiah, 85, 275, 276, 277.
-
- Quincy, Josiah P., 86, 92, 93.
-
- Quincy, Mrs. Josiah P., 92.
-
- Quixote, Don, 110.
-
-
- Radical Club, 114.
-
- Raymond, John T., 253.
-
- Read, John M., 31, 32.
-
- Read, T. Buchanan, 44.
-
- Reade, Charles, 146.
-
- Rip Van Winkle, 111.
-
- Ripley, Miss, 88.
-
- Ripley, Mrs., 91.
-
- Ristori, Adelaide, 222.
-
- Rogers, Samuel, 185.
-
- Rossetti, Christina, 97.
-
- Rowse, Samuel W., 152.
-
- Russell, Thomas, 261.
-
-
- Sanborn, F. B., 68.
-
- Saturday Club, 104, 105, 116 and _n._
-
- Schurz, Carl, 266.
-
- Scott-Siddons, Mrs., 110.
-
- Seward, William H., 28, 219, 267.
-
- Shaw, Lemuel, 232.
-
- Shaw, Robert G., 14, 24.
-
- Shelley, Percy B., 16.
-
- Sherman, William T., 77.
-
- Shiel, Mr., 173, 176.
-
- Silsbee, Mrs., 95, 143.
-
- Smith, Alexander, 17, 19.
-
- Smith, Samuel F., 47.
-
- Smith, Sydney, 89, 257.
-
- Somerset, Duchess of, 46.
-
- Stanley, Edward G. S. S. (afterward 14th Earl of Derby), 173,
- 174, 175.
-
- Stanton, Edwin M., 267.
-
- Stephen, Leslie, 95.
-
- Sterling, John, 75.
-
- Stone, Lucy, 114.
-
- Story, William W., 116.
-
- Stothard, Thomas, 190.
-
- Stowe, Calvin E., 272.
-
- Stowe, “Georgie,” 38, 39.
-
- Stowe, Harriet Beecher, 38, 39, 61, 191 and _n._, 268, 272.
-
- Sumner, Charles, 42, 44, 45, 46, 48, 77, 105, 219, =258-267=.
-
-
- Taylor, Bayard, 109, 110, 111, 116, 117, 118, 119, 228, 266.
-
- Taylor, Mrs. Bayard, 109, 110, 111.
-
- Tennent, Sir Emerson, 153.
-
- Tennyson, Alfred, Lord, 254, 279.
-
- Tennyson, Lady, 279.
-
- Terry, Ellen, 218, 300, 301.
-
- Thackeray, William M., 32, 33, 111, 154, 266.
-
- Thaxter, Celia, 98, =129-131=, 152, 154, 288.
-
- Thompson, Launt, 198.
-
- Thoreau, Helen, 62, 74.
-
- Thoreau, Henry D., 14, 62, 68, 74, 89, 90.
-
- Thoreau, Sophia, 68.
-
- Thoreau, Mrs. (mother of H. D. T.), 62, 68, 74.
-
- Ticknor, William D., =63= _ff._
-
- Ticknor and Fields, 10.
-
- Ticknor, Reed and Fields, 17.
-
- Towne, Alice, 45.
-
- Towne, Helen, 45.
-
- Townshend, Chauncey, 169.
-
- Trimble, Colonel, 273.
-
- Twain, Mark. _See_ Clemens, Samuel L.
-
-
- Upham, J. Baxter, 221 and _n._
-
-
- Vaughan, Henry, 74, 81, 95.
-
- Viardot-Garcia, Michelle F. P., 225.
-
- Victoria, Queen, 187, 188.
-
- Vieuxtemps, Henri, 225.
-
-
- Ward, Artemus. _See_ Browne, Charles F.
-
- Ward, Mary A. (Mrs. Humphry), 288.
-
- Ward, Samuel, 90.
-
- Warren, William, 203, 205, 206.
-
- Washington, George, 259.
-
- Wasson, David A., 114.
-
- Waterston, Mrs., 24.
-
- Watts, Isaac, 101.
-
- Webster, John W., =153=.
-
- Whipple, Edwin P., 20.
-
- White, Andrew D., 92.
-
- Whitman, Sarah, 288.
-
- Whitney, Anne, 101, 102, 206.
-
- Whittier, Elizabeth, 259.
-
- Whittier, John G., =39=, =40=, 68, 70, 114, =129=, =130=,
- =131=, 161, =222=, 244, 288.
-
- Willard, Eliza J. _See_ Fields, Eliza J. (Willard).
-
- MCGRATH-SHERRILL PRESS
- GRAPHIC ARTS BLDG.
- BOSTON
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Memories of a Hostess, by
-Mark Antony De Wolfe Howe and Mrs. James T. (Annie) Fields
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MEMORIES OF A HOSTESS ***
-
-***** This file should be named 62867-0.txt or 62867-0.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/6/2/8/6/62867/
-
-Produced by ellinora and the Online Distributed Proofreading
-Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from
-images generously made available by The Internet
-Archive/American Libraries.)
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
-specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
-eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
-for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
-performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
-away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
-not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
-trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country outside the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
- are located before using this ebook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
-Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
-mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
-volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
-locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
-Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
-date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
-official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
-
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-