summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/62129-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/62129-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/62129-0.txt7807
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 7807 deletions
diff --git a/old/62129-0.txt b/old/62129-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 5182601..0000000
--- a/old/62129-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,7807 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of A History of Story-telling, by Arthur Ransome
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
-other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
-the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
-to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
-
-Title: A History of Story-telling
- Studies in the development of narrative
-
-Author: Arthur Ransome
-
-Illustrator: J. Gavin
-
-Release Date: May 14, 2020 [EBook #62129]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A HISTORY OF STORY-TELLING ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by MFR, Eleni Christofaki and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This
-file was produced from images generously made available
-by The Internet Archive)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber's note.
-
-Minor punctuation inconsistencies have been silently repaired. Variable
-spelling has been retained. Sidenotes are presented [within square
-brackets].
-
-Mark up:
-
- _italic_
- =bold=
-
-
-
-
-A HISTORY OF STORY-TELLING
-
-
-
-
-EDITED BY ARTHUR RANSOME
-
-THE WORLD'S STORY-TELLERS
-
-
-EACH volume contains a selection of complete stories, an Introductory
-Essay by ARTHUR RANSOME, and a Frontispiece Portrait by J. GAVIN.
-
-List of volumes already published:--
-
- GAUTIER
- HOFFMANN
- POE
- HAWTHORNE
- MÉRIMÉE
- BALZAC
- CHATEAUBRIAND
- THE ESSAYISTS
- CERVANTES
- Others in preparation
-
-_In cloth, 1s. net; cloth gilt, gilt top, 1s. 6d. net per vol._
-
-
-LONDON AND EDINBURGH
-
-T. C. AND E. C. JACK
-
-
-
-
-[Illustration: JEAN DE MEUNG]
-
-
-
-
- A HISTORY OF
- STORY-TELLING
-
- STUDIES IN THE
- DEVELOPMENT OF NARRATIVE
-
- BY
- ARTHUR RANSOME
- Editor of 'The World's Story-Tellers'
-
- [Illustration: ALIENI TEMPORIS FLORES]
-
- WITH 27 PORTRAITS BY J. GAVIN
-
- LONDON: T. C. & E. C. JACK
- 16 HENRIETTA STREET, W.C.
- 1909
-
-
-
-
-TO MY WIFE
-
-
-
-
-PREFACE
-
-
-THIS is a spring day, and I am writing in a flood of sunlight in front
-of a brown French inn. Above my head there is the dusty branch of a
-tree stuck out of a window, the ancient sign that gave point to the
-proverb, 'Good wine needs no bush.' Good books, I suppose, need no
-prefaces. But honest authors realise that their books are never as good
-as they had planned them. A preface, put on last and worn in front, to
-show what they would have liked their books to be, is the pleasantest
-of their privileges. And I am not inclined to do without it.
-
-A book that calls itself a history of a subject with as many byeways
-and blind alleys as exist in the history of story-telling, is precisely
-the kind of book that one would wish one's enemy to have written.
-Everybody who reads it grumbles because something or other is left
-out that, if they had had the writing of it, would have been put in.
-And yet in the case of this particular book (how many authors have
-thought the same!) criticism of omissions is like quarrelling with a
-guinea-pig because it has not got a tail. It is not the guinea-pig's
-business to have a tail, and it is not the business of this book to be
-a chronicle, full of facts, and admirable for reference. That place
-is already filled by Dunlop's _History of Fiction_, and, in a very
-delightful manner, by Professor Raleigh's _English Novel_. The word
-history can be used in a different sense. The French say that such an
-one makes a history of a thing when he makes a great deal of talk about
-it. That is what I set out to do. My business was not to be noting down
-dates and facts--this book was published in such a year and this in the
-year preceding. I was to write with a livelier imp astride my pen. The
-schoolmaster was to be sent to steal apples in the orchard. I was to
-write of story-telling as a man might write of painting or jewellery
-or any other art he loved. I was to take here a book and there a book,
-and notice the development of technique, the conquests of new material,
-the gradual perfecting of form. I would talk of old masters and modern
-ones, and string my chapters like beads, a space between each, along
-the history of the art.
-
-Well, I have _fait une histoire_, suggested mainly by the masterpieces
-that I love, and without too much regard for those that happen to be
-loved by other people. And now that it is done, I think of it sadly
-enough. It should have been so beautiful. When I see an old church,
-like the priory church at Cartmel, standing grey and solemn in the mist
-above the houses, or hear an old song, like 'Summer is icumen in,' or
-see a browned old picture, like Poussin's 'Bergers d'Arcadie,' I feel
-that these things have meant more to man than battles. These are his
-dreams and his ideals, resting from age to age, long after the din of
-fighting has died and been forgotten, recorded each in its own way,
-in stone, in melody, in colour, and in the tales also that, changing
-continually, have 'held children from play and old men from the
-chimney-corner,' the dreams lie hid. What a tapestry they should have
-made. For the story of this art, or indeed of any art, is the story
-of man. Looking back through the years, as I sit here and close my
-eyes against the sunlight, I see the hard men and fierce women of the
-Sagas living out their lives in the cold and vigorous north--Pippin,
-the grandfather of Charlemagne, sticking his sword indifferently
-through the devil, Beaumains and his scornful lady riding through the
-green wood. In the dungeon of the tower sits Aucassin sorrowing for
-Nicolete his so sweet friend. Among the orange-trees on the Italian
-slope the gold-haired Fiammetta watches for her lover. With battered
-armour and ascetic face Don Quixote, upright in his saddle, rides on
-the bare roads of Spain, dreaming of Dulcinea del Toboso. Gil Blas
-swindles his way through life and comes out top as an honest rascal
-will. Clarissa sits in her chamber blotting with tears her interminable
-correspondence. Tom Jones draws blood from many meaner noses. My Uncle
-Toby looks, not in the white, for the mote in the Widow Wadman's
-eye. Mrs. Bennet begs her husband, to 'come and make Lizzy marry Mr.
-Collins.' Old Goriot pawns his plate and moves to cheaper and yet
-cheaper rooms to keep his daughters in their luxury. Raphael, nearing
-death, watches the relentless shrinking of the morsel of shagreen.
-There falls the House of Usher. There floats the white face of Marie
-Roget down the waters of the Seine. Quasimodo leers through the rosace;
-Mateo Falcone feels the earth with the butt of his gun and finds it
-not too hard for the digging of a child's grave; Clarimonde throws her
-passionate regard across the cathedral to the young novice about to
-take his vows; and, with a clatter of hoofs, the musketeers ride off
-for the reputation of the Queen of France.
-
-A tapestry indeed.
-
-I turn over my chapters, torn rags of colour loosely patched together,
-and then look back to my dream, that gorgeous thing that for these
-five years past has glittered and swung before me. I look from one to
-the other and back again, and am almost ready to tear up the book in
-order to regain the delightful possession of the dream. It was a task
-to be taken up reverently and with love; and indeed these are the only
-qualifications I can honestly claim. But it needed far more. Now that I
-have done my best, I look at the result and am afraid. I hate, like I
-hate the tourists in Notre Dame, impertinent little books on splendid
-subjects. With my heart in my mouth I ask myself if I have made one.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Impertinent or no, my book is very vulnerable, and since it is my own I
-must defend it, so far as that is possible, by defining my intentions.
-The chapters are, as I meant them be, threaded like beads along the
-history of the art, and it is very easy to quarrel not only with the
-beads, but also with the spaces between them. There is no one who
-reads the book who will not find somewhere a space where he would have
-had a gleaming bead, a bead, where he would have had a contemptuous
-space. I could not put everything in; but have left material for many
-complementary volumes. It would perhaps be possible, writing only of
-authors I have not considered, to produce a history of story-telling
-no more incomplete than this. But it will be found, and the fact is
-perhaps my justification, that few of my omissions have been made by
-accident. In order to have the satisfaction of coming to an end at
-all, I had to seek the closest limits, and those limits, once chosen,
-barred, to my own surprise, more than one great story-teller from any
-detailed discussion.
-
-My object not being an expanded bibliography of story-telling, but
-rather a series of chapters that would trace the development of the
-art, many admirable writers, who were content with the moulds that
-were ready made to their hands, fell outside my range, however noble,
-however human was the material they poured into the ancient matrices.
-Dickens and Thackeray, for example, pouring their energy and feeling
-and wit and humour into the moulds designed by the eighteenth century,
-had, economically, to be passed over, since across the channel and in
-America men were writing stories, not necessarily greater, nor of wider
-appeal to mankind, but of more vital interest to their fellow artists.
-Throughout the book we hunt, my readers and I, with the hare. Always
-we discuss the art in those examples that seem the most advanced of
-their time. Just as with the Romantic movement I pass over from England
-to France, though the book contains no survey of French fiction, so
-when Cervantes is the leading story-teller, the artist nearest our own
-time, I shall be in Spain, though Spanish literature does not make a
-continuous thread in the history. I shall think more of the art than
-of my own country, or indeed of any country, and shall neglect all
-literatures in turn when they are producing nothing that is memorable
-in the progress of the technique of story-telling, however freely they
-may be contributing great or brilliant tales to the world's resources
-of amusement.
-
-Then too, it will be noticed that I neglect my opportunities.
-What a semblance of erudition I might have made by discussing,
-among the origins of story-telling, the Greek and Latin specimens
-of narrative. But it seemed desirable, since it was possible, to
-trace the development of the art entirely in the literatures of our
-own civilisation. French and English, the two greatest European
-literatures, contain, grafted on their national stocks, every flower
-of the art that was cultivated by Greece or Rome. I have used for
-discussion only the books known and made by our own ancestors, and
-when, at the Renaissance, they lifted forms out of Antiquity and
-filled them with imitations of classical matter, I have considered
-the imitations rather than the originals, if only because any further
-influence they may have had on the development of the art was exerted
-not by the classical writers but by the Englishmen, Frenchmen,
-Spaniards, and Italians who made their manners and materials their own.
-
-The book represents many years of reading, and two of writing where it
-should have taken ten. It has travelled about with me piecemeal, and,
-if I dated my chapters from the places where I wrote them, they would
-trace a very various itinerary. In France, in England, and in Scotland
-it has shared my adventures, and indeed it is a wilful, rambling thing,
-more than a little reminiscent of its infancy. Do not expect it to be
-too consistent. There is, I fear, no need for me to ask you not to read
-it all at once.
-
- ARTHUR RANSOME.
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS
-
-
- PAGE
-
- PREFACE vii
-
- PART I
-
- ORIGINS 5
- 'THE ROMANCE OF THE ROSE' 19
- CHAUCER AND BOCCACCIO 31
- THE ROGUE NOVEL 51
- THE ELIZABETHANS 67
- THE PASTORAL 81
- CERVANTES 93
- THE ESSAYISTS' CONTRIBUTION TO STORY-TELLING 107
- TRANSITION: BUNYAN AND DEFOE 125
- RICHARDSON AND THE FEMININE NOVEL 139
- FIELDING, SMOLLETT, AND THE MASCULINE NOVEL 155
- A NOTE ON STERNE 169
-
- PART II
-
- CHATEAUBRIAND AND ROMANTICISM 175
- SCOTT AND ROMANTICISM 187
- THE ROMANTICISM OF 1830 201
- BALZAC 217
- GAUTIER AND THE EAST 231
- POE AND THE NEW TECHNIQUE 243
- HAWTHORNE AND MORAL ROMANCE 257
- MÉRIMÉE AND CONVERSATIONAL STORY-TELLING 273
- FLAUBERT 287
- A NOTE ON DE MAUPASSANT 298
- CONCLUSION 305
-
- INDEX 313
-
-
-
-
-ILLUSTRATIONS
-
-
- TO FACE PAGE
-
- JEAN DE MEUNG 22
- GEOFFREY CHAUCER 38
- GIOVANNI BOCCACCIO 44
- ALAIN RENÉ LE SAGE 60
- SIR PHILIP SIDNEY 84
- MIGUEL DE CERVANTES SAAVEDRA 96
- RICHARD STEELE AND JOSEPH ADDISON 114
- JOHN BUNYAN 126
- DANIEL DEFOE 132
- SAMUEL RICHARDSON 140
- FANNY BURNEY 146
- JANE AUSTEN 150
- HENRY FIELDING 156
- TOBIAS SMOLLETT 166
- JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU 176
- FRANÇOIS RENÉ DE CHATEAUBRIAND 180
- SIR WALTER SCOTT 188
- VICTOR HUGO 202
- ALEXANDRE DUMAS 210
- HONORÉ DE BALZAC 218
- THÉOPHILE GAUTIER 236
- WILLIAM GODWIN 244
- EDGAR ALLAN POE 250
- NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE 258
- PROSPER MÉRIMÉE 274
- GUSTAVE FLAUBERT 288
- GUY DE MAUPASSANT 300
-
-
-
-
-PART I
-
-
-
-
-ORIGINS
-
-
-
-
-ORIGINS
-
-
-[Story-telling outside books.]
-
-STORY-TELLING has nowadays only a shamefaced existence outside books.
-We leave the art to the artist, perhaps because he has brought it to
-such perfection that we do not care to expose our amateur bunglings. If
-a man has a story to tell after dinner he carefully puts it into slang,
-or tells it with jerk and gesture in as few words as possible; it is as
-if he were to hold up a little placard deprecating the idea that he is
-telling a story at all. The only tales in which we allow ourselves much
-detail of colouring and background are those in which public opinion
-has prohibited professional competition. We tell improper stories
-as competently as ever. But, for the other tales, we set them out
-concisely, almost curtly, refusing any attempt to imitate the fuller,
-richer treatment of literature. Our tales are mere plots. We allow
-ourselves scarcely two sentences of dialogue to clinch them at the
-finish. We give them no framework. We are shy, except perhaps before a
-single intimate friend, of trying in a spoken story to reproduce the
-effect of moonlight in the trees, the flickering firelight on the faces
-in a tavern, or whatever else of delicacy and embroidery we should be
-glad to use in writing.
-
-But in the beginning story-telling was not an affair of pen and ink.
-It began with the Warning Examples naturally told by a mother to her
-children, and with the Embroidered Exploits told by a boaster to his
-wife or friends. The early woman would persuade her child from the
-fire with a tale of how just such another as he had touched the yellow
-dancer, and had had his hair burned and his eyelashes singed so that
-he could not look in the face of the sun. Enjoying the narrative, she
-would give it realistic and credible touches, and so make something
-more of it than the dull lie of utility. The early man, fresh from an
-encounter with some beast of the woods, would not be so little of an
-artist as to tell the actual facts; how he heard a noise, the creaking
-of boughs and crackling in the undergrowth, and ran. No; he would
-describe the monster, sketch his panic moments, the short, fierce
-struggle, his stratagem, and his escape. In these two primitive tales,
-and their combination in varying proportions, are the germs of all
-the others. There is no story written to-day which cannot trace its
-pedigree to those two primitive types of narrative, generated by the
-vanity of man and the exigencies of his life.
-
-[The professional story-teller.]
-
-At first there would be no professional story-tellers. But it would
-not be long before, by the camp fire, in the desert tents, and in
-the huts at night, wherever simple men were together relating the
-experiences of vigorous days, there would be found some one whose
-adventures were always the pleasantest to hear, whose deeds were the
-most marvellous, whose realistic details the most varied. Probably it
-would also be found that this same man could also give the neatest
-point to the tales of wisdom that were the children of the Warning
-Example. Men would begin to quote his stories, and gradually the
-discrepancy between his life and the life that he lived as he recounted
-it to his nightly audiences would grow too great to be ignored. His
-adventures would become too tremendous for himself, and, to save his
-modesty and preserve his credit, he would father them upon some dead
-chief, a strong man who had done things that others had not, and, being
-dead, was unable to contradict with his stone axe his too enthusiastic
-biographer. Such a man, like many a modern story-teller, would likely
-use his hold over the imagination of his fellows to become the medicine
-man of his tribe, the depositary of their traditions, their sage as
-well as their entertainer. He would create gods besides rebuilding men,
-and while his people were sheltering in the huts and listening atremble
-to the dying rolls of the thunder, would describe how his hero, the
-dead chief of long ago, was even now wrestling with the Thunder God and
-getting his knee upon that mighty throat. In the beginning man was a
-very little thing in the face of a stupendous Universe. Story-telling
-raised him higher and higher until at last heaven and earth were hidden
-by the gigantic figure of a man. In the Arthur legend, in the legend of
-Charlemagne, in the Sagas, we can watch men becoming heroes, and heroes
-supernatural. Then story-telling, having done so much, was to set to
-work in the opposite direction, and we shall see the figures of men
-gradually shrinking into their true proportions through each successive
-phase of the art, until, now that we have examples of all stages
-permanently before us, we manufacture gods, heroes, men, and creatures
-less than men, with almost equal profusion.
-
-[In early story-telling heroes are more than life size.]
-
-But in the beginning of written story-telling, when life was a huge
-battle in which it was the proper thing to die, when the heroes of
-stories were not finished off with marriage but by the more definite
-means of a battle-axe, when life was a thing of such swiftness,
-fierceness, and force, it was clear to his biographer that the creature
-who conquered it was surely more than man. His were the attributes of
-the gods, with whom he was not frightened to struggle or to be allied.
-Sigurd's pedigree is carried back to Odin. Pippin struck a sword
-through the devil who met him as he went to bath, and found that 'the
-shape was so far material that it defiled all those waters with blood
-and gore and horrid slime. Even this did not upset the unconquerable
-Pippin. He said to his chamberlain: "Do not mind this little affair.
-Let the defiled water run for a while; and then, when it flows clear
-again, I will take my bath without delay."' Beowulf fought with dragons
-and died boasting gloriously. Theirs are the figures of men a thousand
-times man's height, very man-like, but gigantic, like the watchers
-shadowed on the mountain mist.
-
-[Silk and homespun stories.]
-
-Each nation showed its peculiar spirit in huge cycles of narrative.
-The solid force of the Vikings and their sword-bright imagery survives
-in the Sagas; the French chivalry in the legends of Charlemagne and
-Arthur; the Celtic feeling for the veiled things in the spells and
-dreams of the _Mabinogion_. These were the great stories of their
-peoples. But side by side with them were others. The thralls of the
-Vikings heard of Brunhild and Gudrun, the serfs of France heard of
-Roland and Bertha with the Large Feet; but they had also tales of their
-own. The tales of silk have been preserved for us in writing, but what
-of the tales of homespun yarn that no old clerk thought worthy of a
-manuscript with gold leaves, and sweet faces, and blue and scarlet
-flowers entwined around its borders?
-
-Very few of these homespun stories were written down. _Reynard the
-Fox_ had few brethren except in spoken story-telling. Perhaps just
-because they never were written down, we can guess from the folk-lore
-that has survived among us to our own day, and from the tales we hear
-from savages, what were those tales of Jean and Jaques, that were
-perhaps nearer modern story-telling than the great books that were
-known by their masters. In folk-tale, as in _Reynard the Fox_, we find
-very different virtues from those of the knights, heroes, kings, and
-gods. In the silken tales the virtues are those of Don Quixote; in the
-homespun stories they are those of Sancho Panza. Chivalry would seem an
-old conceit; bravery, foolhardiness. Sagacity, cunning, and mischief
-are their motives. In the silken tales there is no scorn shown save of
-cowards, in the folk-tales none save of fools. Perhaps the proverbs
-illustrate them best. 'Do not close the stable door after the horse has
-gone.' 'A stitch in time saves nine.' 'A bird in the hand is worth two
-in the bush.' These are all short stories summed in a sentence, and any
-one of them might serve as the motive of a modern novel.
-
-[The swineherd and the king's daughter.]
-
-From the time that stories began to be written down, we can watch them
-coming nearer and nearer to this level, nearer and nearer the ordinary
-man. The history of story-telling henceforth is that of the abasement
-of the grand and the uplifting of the lowly, and of the mingling of the
-two. The folk-tale of the swineherd who married the king's daughter is
-the history alike of the progress of humanity and of the materials of
-story-telling.
-
-[Reduction in the size of the heroes.]
-
-But before the heroes of written story-telling could begin to be
-humble, they had to leave off being gods. It is possible to observe
-the transformation by comparing a set of early stories composed at
-practically the same time, but in different countries, in different
-stages of civilisation, and so, for the purpose of our argument,
-in sequence. The _Volsunga Saga_, the _Mabinogion_ and _Aucassin
-and Nicolete_ were all composed about the same time, but there are
-centuries of development between them. The heroes of the sagas are 'too
-largely thewed for life'; Aucassin is a boy. Love in the sagas is a
-fierce passion, the mainspring of terrific deeds; Aucassin's love is
-a tender obsession that keeps him from his arms, and lets him ride,
-careless and dreaming, into the midst of his enemies. In the _Morte
-Darthur_, as we have it in Malory's version of the much older tales,
-we can see the two spirits pulling at cross purposes in the same book.
-Beneath there is the rugged brutality of the old fighting tales,
-overlaid now with the softer texture of chivalry and gentleness. The
-one shows through the other like the grey rock through the green turf
-of our north country fields.
-
-[Technique of the Sagas.]
-
-The technique of the old tales varies most precisely with the humanity
-and loss of super-humanity of their heroes. In the sagas it is very
-simple. The effect is got by sheer weight and mass of magnificent
-human material. The details are those of personal appearance and
-armour; there are no settings. The men ride out gorgeous and bright
-in battle array, with gold about their helms, and painted shields, on
-great white horses against a sombre sky. There is no other background
-to the tales than heaven and the watchful gods. It was not until a
-later stage in their development that story-tellers painted their full
-canvas, and put in woodland and castle and all those other accessories
-that force their human figures to a human height. At first, like the
-early painters, they were content with the outlines of men doing
-things; their audiences, with unspoilt imaginations, filled in the rest
-themselves. Then, too, they told their tales in a short sing-song form
-of verse that served well to keep them in mind, but prevented any great
-variation in emphasis. A lament for the dead warrior, a pæan for his
-victory, and an account of his wife's beauty, a genealogical tree, were
-all forced to jog to the same tune, and the atmosphere and scent of
-their telling could only be altered by the intonations of the singer.
-They still depended for their effect on the men who recited them, and
-had not achieved the completeness of expression that would give them
-independence.
-
-[Of the _Mabinogion_.]
-
-The _Mabinogion_, that took literary form at about the same time, were
-made by a Celtic nation, far further advanced as artists than the
-Scandinavians. The men are not so great in their biographers' eyes as
-to hide all else. Picture after picture is made and left as the tale
-goes on. For example:--
-
- 'And at the mouth of the river he beheld a castle, the fairest that
- man ever saw, and the gate of the castle was open, and he went
- into the castle. And in the castle he saw a fair hall, of which
- the roof seemed to be all gold; the walls of the hall seemed to be
- entirely of glittering precious gems; the doors all seemed to be of
- gold. Golden seats he saw in the hall, and silver tables. And on
- a seat opposite to him he beheld two auburn-haired youths playing
- at chess. He saw a silver board for the chess, and golden pieces
- thereon. The garments of the youths were of jet black satin, and
- chaplets of ruddy gold bound their hair, whereon were sparkling
- jewels of great price, rubies, and gems, alternately with imperial
- stones. Buskins of new Cordovan leather on their feet, fastened by
- slides of red gold.
-
- 'And beside a pillar in the hall he saw a hoary-headed man, in
- a chair of ivory, with the figures of two eagles of ruddy gold
- thereon. Bracelets of gold were upon his arms, and many rings were
- on his hands, and a golden torque about his neck; and his hair was
- bound with a golden diadem. He was of powerful aspect. A chessboard
- of gold was before him and a rod of gold, and a steel file in his
- hand. And he was carving out chessmen.'[1]
-
-These two paragraphs are almost perfect in their kind. See only how
-the details are presented in a perfectly natural order, each one
-as it would strike a man advancing into the hall, who would see
-everything before discovering exactly what the old man was about with
-his chessboard, his gold, and his steel file. The Welsh bards were
-trained more rigorously than the skalds, and were more delicate in
-their craftsmanship. And yet it is interesting to see how these two
-paragraphs are the work of a man writing for people in whose eyes gold
-and ivory and precious stones have still the glory of the new. The
-feeling of that little piece of story is the same we know ourselves
-when we have a little child before us, and are telling it wonderful
-things to make it open its eyes. The opening of eyes was one of the
-effects at which the early artists aimed.
-
-[Of _Aucassin and Nicolete_.]
-
-And then when we come to _Aucassin and Nicolete_, also written at
-the same time, but in a country still less barbaric, we find an even
-more delicate artistry, and a material far nearer that of later
-story-telling. Not only have the heroes become men, but the wondrous
-background has become that of real life. There are no castles in
-_Aucassin and Nicolete_ whose walls are built 'of precious gems, whose
-doors are all of gold.' Nicolete 'went through the streets of Beaucaire
-keeping to the shadow, for the moon shone very bright; and she went on
-till she came to the tower where her friend was. The tower had cracks
-in it here and there, and she crouched against one of the piers, and
-wrapped herself in her mantle, and thrust her head into a chink in the
-tower, which was old and ancient, and heard Aucassin within weeping,
-and making very great sorrow, and lamenting for his sweet friend whom
-he loved so much.' Now that is a real tower, as we see again when
-presently Nicolete has to go along its wall, and let herself down into
-the ditch, hurting her feet sorely before climbing out on the other
-side. And is not that an admirable sense for reality that suggested
-the keeping to the shadow as she crept through the town? As for the
-humanity of the tale; we have been smitten to awe and worship by the
-heroes of the sagas, interested in the heroes of the magic-laden
-Mabinogion, and now we are made to be sorry for Aucassin. Like the
-swing of a pendulum, the character of heroes has swung from that of
-God-like ruffians, through that of men, almost to womanhood. We have
-had terrible tales, and wondrous tales, and now
-
- 'There is none in such ill case,
- Sad with sorrow, waste with care,
- Sick with sadness, if he hear,
- But shall in the hearing be
- Whole again and glad with glee,
- So _sweet_ the story.'
-
-Loveliness and delicacy are here for their own sakes. We have already
-passed the early stages of narrative. We are in the time of sweetly
-patterned art; in the monastery over in England a monk is writing
-the air of 'Summer is icumen in,' the first known piece of finished,
-ordered music; everywhere clerks and holy men, aloof a little from the
-turmoil of life, are making gardens in the margins of missals, and on
-the roads throughout the world the vagabond students, as separate from
-the turmoil as the monks, are singing the Latin songs that promised the
-Renaissance.
-
-
-
-
-'THE ROMANCE OF THE ROSE'
-
-
-
-
-'THE ROMANCE OF THE ROSE'
-
-
-[The thirteenth century.]
-
-THINKING of the Renaissance now, we are apt to see only the flowers
-of its spring, the work of men like Boccaccio and Chaucer, who were
-strong enough and aloof enough to lift their heads above the flood of
-classical learning that refreshed them, and to write as blithely as if
-there had been never a book in the world before them. It is easy to
-forget those dull years after Chaucer that showed how exceptional he
-had been in being at once a student and an artist. It is still easier
-to forget the winter years of ploughing and sowing and premature birth
-that were before him, the years when no one thought that poetry could
-be more esteemed than knowledge, those greedy years of rough and ready
-erudition between the making of the students' songs and the building of
-the _Decameron_. Many versions of old legends come to us from that time
-like the _Life of Robert the Devil_, whose son fought with Charlemagne.
-Many of the legends of the kind that the son of Mr. Bickerstaff's
-friend was such a proficient in, and many collections of miracles and
-small romances of chivalry less beautiful than that of Aucassin, were
-at least written down in these years. The monasteries held most of
-the learned men, and became more important than the minstrels in the
-history of story-telling. They produced the books of miracles, and also
-several armouries of warning examples, many of them taken from the
-classics, for the vanquishing of scrupulous sinners and the edification
-of all. Books like the _Gesta Romanorum_, volumes of tales more or less
-irrelevantly tagged with morals, were the forerunners of collections
-of less instructive stories, like those of Boccaccio's country-house
-party, or those of Chaucer's pilgrims riding to Canterbury. These
-books, with their frequent reference to antiquity, showed signs of the
-new spirit that was spreading over Europe; the miracle-tales and the
-exaggerated wondering biographies held the essence of the old. Rome in
-the former was the city built by Romulus and Remus; Rome in the latter
-was the place that had been rescued by Charlemagne, the place that was
-ruled by the Pope.
-
-But in that thirteenth century, when so many new things were struggling
-to birth, one book stands out above all others as the most perfect
-illustration of its spirit. The very fact that it is so much less of a
-story than the anecdotes of the _Gesta Romanorum_ had almost made me
-pass it over in a more detailed criticism of them, but this same fact
-perfects it as an example of an artist's attitude in the time of the
-revival of classical learning. It was almost an accident that let me
-see these years of novel study and eager wisdom so clearly expressed in
-the long rhyming narrative of the _Romance of the Rose_, that was known
-above all other books for a hundred years, that was read by Ronsard,
-modernised by Marot, and partly translated by Chaucer. The accident was
-such that I think there is no irrelevance in describing it.
-
-[Meung-sur-Loire.]
-
-Walking through France with the manuscript of my history on my back,
-I came at evening of an April day into the little grey French town of
-Meung, set on the side of a hill above the Loire. Small cobbled streets
-twisted this way and that, up and down, between the old houses, and
-walking under the gateway, the Porte d'Amont, with its low arch and
-narrow windows overhead, I felt I was stepping suddenly from the broad,
-practical France, whose roadside crucifixes are made of iron a hundred
-at a time, into a forgotten corner of that older France whose spirit
-clings about the new, like the breath of lavender in a room where it
-has once been kept. In the inn where I left my knapsack there was a
-miller who drank a bottle of wine with me, and talked of old Jean
-Clopinel, who was born here in Meung those centuries ago. 'And it was
-a big book he had the writing of too, and a wise book, so they tell
-me, and good poetry; but it's written in the old French that's not our
-language any longer; I could not read it if I tried, and why should I?
-They know all about it in the town.'
-
-Indeed the town seemed a piece of the old French itself, with its
-partly ruined church, and the little château crowned with conical
-cap-like towers, the broad Loire flowing below. I thought of _The
-Romance of the Rose_, Jean Clopinel's book, the book that meant so
-much to the Middle Ages, the book that, unwieldy as it is, is still
-deliciously alive. I thought of Jean Clopinel and his description of
-himself, put as a prophecy into the mouth of the God of Love:--
-
- 'Then shall appear Jean Clopinel,
- Joyous of heart, of body well
- And fairly built: at Meun shall he
- Be born where Loire flows peacefully.'[2]
-
-I made up my mind to look at the old book again when I should have
-left the road, and be within reach of a larger library than my own
-manuscript and a single volume of Defoe.
-
-[Jean de Meung.]
-
-Jean de Meung, joyous of heart, belongs absolutely to the mediæval
-revival of learning. He was less of a poet than a scholar, more pleased
-with a display of knowledge than of beauty, and yet so far undamped by
-his learning as to be always ready to put plainly out such observations
-upon life as keep a reader smiling to-day at their shrewdness and
-applicability. His share of _The Romance of the Rose_ is a strange and
-suggestive contrast with the beginning that was written by Guillaume
-de Lorris. The first part, earlier by forty years than the second, and
-about a fifth of the length, is a delicious allegory on love, with
-the sweetness and purity of _Aucassin and Nicolete_; the second opens
-solidly with a good round speech by Reason, filling something like two
-thousand lines, and ransacking antiquity to fit her wise saws with
-ancient instances according to the new fashion of the time.
-
-Taine finds this garrulous Jean 'the most tedious of doctors'; but it
-is difficult not to throw yourself into his own delight in his new-won
-knowledge, hard not to enjoy his continual little revelations of
-character, as when you read:--
-
- 'Let one demand of some wise clerk
- Well versed in that most noble work
- "Of Consolation" foretime writ
- By great Boethius, for in it
- Are stored and hidden most profound
- And learned lessons: 'twould redound
- Greatly to that man's praise who should
- Translate that book with masterhood,'
-
-and know that he made the translation himself.
-
-[The world at school.]
-
-The very popularity of the book proves that the whole world was at
-school then, and eager to be taught. Lorris, poet though he is, reminds
-his readers that his embroidered tale hides something really valuable,
-that it is 'fair wit with wisdom closely wed,' knowing well that he
-could find no better bait to keep them with him to the end. And Jean,
-when it comes to his turn, admirably expresses the contemporary point
-of view. He has no doubts at all between the comparative worths of
-manner and matter. He justifies the classics by saying:--
-
- 'For oft their quip and crank and fable
- Is wondrous good and profitable.'
-
-[One of the schoolmasters.]
-
-The permanent value of knowledge is always before him, and having
-learnt a great deal himself, what wonder that he should empty it all
-out, only now and again giving the tale a perfunctory prod forward
-before continuing his discourse? Knowledge comes always before culture,
-and knowledge taken with such abandon is almost inspiriting. I cannot
-be bored by a scholar who in the thirteenth century is so independent
-and so frank. Eager quarry work such as his had to precede the refined
-statuary of the Renaissance, and in _The Romance of the Rose_ the
-pedagogue is far too human to be dismissed as a dealer in books alone.
-Wisdom and observation were not disunited in him, and there are in that
-rambling, various repository of learning promises enough of realistic
-story-telling and of the criticism of life, sufficiently valuable
-to excuse its atrocious narrative, even were that not justified by
-the classical allusion with which it is so abundantly loaded. It
-gives me pleasure to hear Jean Clopinel defend plain speaking, and,
-protesting against calling spades anything but spades, prepare the
-way for Rabelais. What matter if the romance suffer a little, and the
-Rose lie pressed beneath a weight of scholarship? Jean himself moves
-on unhampered. He talked of women's table-manners so well that Chaucer
-himself could do no better than borrow from him. He attacked womenkind
-in general so mercilessly (with the authority of the classics behind
-him) that he won a stern rebuke from Christine de Pisan, that popular
-authoress of a century later, just as Schopenhauer might be censured by
-Miss Corelli. He looks at kings, and, turning away, remarks that it is
-best, if a man wishes to feel respectful towards them, that he should
-not see them too close. Nor does he forget to let us know his views
-on astronomy, on immortality, or his preference of nature over art in
-sculpture and painting. This last opinion of his is an illustration
-of that good and honest Philistinism that he needed for his work. All
-these things and a thousand others he puts, without a shudder, into the
-continuation of a story on the art of loving, that begins with a spring
-morning account of a dreamer's vision of a rose and a garden, and Mirth
-and Idleness, Youth and Courtesy, dancing together as if in a picture
-by Botticelli.
-
-[In Meung six hundred years ago.]
-
-I went down that night just after sunset and crossed the river in the
-dusk. Resting in the middle of the bridge and looking over the dim
-reflections to the far-distant bank, with its grove of huge trees, and
-the tower of the church with the outline of the gateway on the hill
-behind just showing against the sky, I dreamed that I was back in the
-old days, when the minstrel was giving place to the scholar, and that
-up there on the hill, in the little town of Meung, was Jean, Doctor of
-Divinity, poring at his books. I remembered the bust by Desvergnes,
-that beautiful scholar's face, and thought how strong a personality his
-must have been, to leave after six hundred years and more the memory of
-himself and the feeling of his time so vividly impressed upon the town.
-For even now, though they do not read his book in Meung, they know all
-about it, and talk of him with that reverence in speaking that children
-use when they talk of a master whom they do not often see. I could not
-help feeling that their attitude was traditional. It has been the same
-for all these years, and perhaps long ago the townsfolk, passing in
-the narrow streets, hushed themselves before one door, and whispered,
-'Yes; he is in there writing a book; there are not many who can do
-that,' while old Jean Clopinel inside nursed his lame leg and dipped
-from folio to folio, as he took gem and pebble from the dead tongue and
-put his vivid thought and gleeful knowledge in black letter on the
-parchment, in black-lettered French, the speech of his own people, that
-all might see how fine a thing it was to look into antiquity and to be
-wise.
-
-
-
-
-CHAUCER AND BOCCACCIO
-
-
-
-
-CHAUCER AND BOCCACCIO
-
-
-[The Romancers before Chaucer.]
-
-THE Franklin of Chaucer's pilgrims introduces his own story by
-remarking that,
-
- 'Thise olde gentil Britons in hir dayes
- Of diverse aventures maden layes,
- Rymeyed in hir firste Briton tonge;
- Which layes with hir instruments they songe,
- Or elles redden hem for hir pleasaunce;
- And oon of hem have I in remembraunce
- Which I shal seyn with good wil as I can.'
-
-Chaucer had many of them 'in remembraunce,' and though he shared the
-knowledge of Jean de Meung, and was not, like the Franklin, a man who
-
- 'sleep never on the mount of Parnaso,
- Ne lerned Marcus Tullius Cithero,'
-
-these tales, whether made by the 'olde gentil Britons' or the French,
-must not be forgotten in considering him.
-
-The romancers who preceded him, and, clad in bright colours, chanted
-their stories before the ladies and knights in the rush-carpeted halls,
-turning somersaults between their chapters, as many a modern novelist
-might for the enlivenment of his narrative, were not scholars, but
-had great store of legendary matter from which they made their tales.
-Their material continued to be used, more and more elaborately, until
-the time of Cervantes, and in such books as the _Morte Darthur_ we can
-see what manner of material it was. They were not in the least afraid
-of the supernatural, and they knew the undying attraction of hard
-blows. Their tales were compiled without reference to the classics,
-and contain all the characteristics of primitive story-telling noted
-in the chapter on Origins. They represented, fairly accurately, the
-Embroidered Exploit. They were tales of heroes, knights, and kings,
-half elfin stuff, half history, elaborate genealogical narratives in
-which the sins of the fathers are visited upon the children, and the
-grandsons' misfortunes are connected with their parents' revenge on
-the previous generation. There were great dragon-slayers before the
-Lord, and many who, like Charlemagne, were mighty killers of Saracens
-in the cause of Christendom. And then there were such tales as that of
-Melusine, whose father, King Helymas, married a fairy, and out of love
-for her broke his promise not to inquire how she was when she lay in
-childbed. Melusine suffers accordingly, spending every Saturday bathing
-herself, with her delicate white limbs hidden beneath a serpent's scaly
-skin. There comes to her a young knight called Raymondin whom she
-saves by her wisdom, enriches by her magic, weds with great pomp, and
-presents in successive years with ten sons, each curiously deformed by
-reason of the fairy blood. Raymondin, in espousing her, promises to
-make no inquiries about her doings on Saturdays. He breaks his promise,
-like his father-in-law before him, and when, in anger at the ill-deeds
-of one of his sons, he reproaches her with what she is, she sadly takes
-leave of him, and flies off through the window, 'transfigured lyke a
-serpent grete and long in fifteen foote of lengthe.' There were tales
-too of more charming fancy, like that of the queen who bore seven
-children at a birth, six boys and a girl, with silver chains about
-their necks. The midwife, in her devilish way, showed her seven puppies
-with silver collars instead of her litter of babes, privately sending
-the children to be killed. The children, however, left in the forest,
-were nurtured by a nanny-goat and cared for by a hermit, until the
-midwife discovered that they were not dead, when she sent men to see
-that they were properly scotched. But the men were so softened by the
-accident of meeting a crowd busied with the burning of a woman who had
-killed her child, that they had only heart to take the chains from off
-the babies' necks, whereupon they flew away as white swans. That is the
-beginning of the tale.
-
-[The _Gesta Romanorum._]
-
-There were tales like these representing the Embroidered Exploit,
-and there were others illustrating in a curious manner the growth of
-the Warning Example. These latter were the forerunners of the tales
-of Boccaccio, who, like Chaucer, stands as it were with a Janus-head,
-looking both ways, modern and primitive at once. The _Gesta Romanorum_
-is a perfectly delightful book, whose purpose was, however, not
-pleasure but edification. It is a collection of stories containing
-amusement and religion, diversion and instruction--a primrose path from
-the everlasting bonfire. The anecdotes are from a thousand sources.
-Many of them are taken from the classics, but the references are so
-inaccurate as to make it pretty certain that the monkish writer had not
-read them, but had gleaned them from the conversation of other monks he
-knew. And some of them cannot have come to him within the monastery.
-I can imagine the old man, with his hood well thrown back, lolling on
-a bench, behind a tankard of good wine and a dish of fruit, laughing
-gleefully at the tale of the rich patroness or pious knight who wished
-to entertain themselves and him. For almost the only things monkish
-about the stories are the applications or morals, some of which are so
-far fetched as to make it clear that the monk compiler has included a
-tale for the pleasure he has himself won from it, and, after writing it
-down, been hard put to it to find a moral that should justify its place
-in a book intended as an armoury for preachers. Here is an example:--
-
-
- 'OF THE AVARICIOUS PURSUIT OF RICHES, WHICH LEADS TO HELL.'
-
- 'A certain carpenter, residing in a city near the sea, very
- covetous and very wicked, collected a large sum of money, and
- placed it in the trunk of a tree, which he stationed by his
- fireside, and which he never lost sight of. A place like this, he
- thought, no one could suspect; but it happened, that while all his
- household slept, the sea overflowed its boundaries, broke down
- that side of the building where the log was situated, and carried
- it away. It floated many miles from its original destination, and
- reached at length a city in which there lived a person who kept
- open house. Arising early in the morning, he perceived the trunk
- of a tree in the water, and thinking it would be of service to
- him, he brought it to his own home. He was a liberal, kind-hearted
- man, and a great benefactor to the poor. It one day chanced that
- he entertained some pilgrims in his house; and the weather being
- extremely cold, he cut up the log for firewood. When he had struck
- two or three blows with the axe, he heard a rattling sound;
- and cleaving it in twain, the gold pieces rolled out in every
- direction. Greatly rejoiced at the discovery, he reposited them in
- a secure place, until he should ascertain who was the owner.
-
- 'Now the carpenter, bitterly lamenting the loss of his money,
- travelled from place to place in pursuit of it. He came, by
- accident, to the house of the hospitable man who had found the
- trunk. He failed not to mention the object of his search; and the
- host, understanding that the money was his, reflected whether his
- title to it were good. "I will prove," said he to himself, "if God
- will that the money should be returned to him." Accordingly he made
- three cakes, the first of which he filled with earth, the second
- with the bones of dead men, and in the third he put a quantity of
- the gold which he had discovered in the trunk. "Friend," said he,
- addressing the carpenter, "we will eat three cakes, composed of the
- best meat in my house. Chuse which you will have." The carpenter
- did as he was directed, he took the cakes and weighed them in
- his hand, one after another, and finding that the earth weighed
- heaviest, he chose it. "And if I want more, my worthy host," added
- he, "I will have that"--laying his hand upon the cake containing
- the bones. "You may keep the third cake yourself." "I see clearly,"
- murmured the host, "I see very clearly that God does not will the
- money to be returned to this wretched man." Calling, therefore,
- the poor and infirm, the blind and the lame, and opening the cake
- of gold in the presence of the carpenter, to whom he spoke, "Thou
- miserable varlet, this is thine own gold. But thou preferredst the
- cake of earth and dead men's bones. I am persuaded, therefore, that
- God wills not that I return thee thy money." Without delay, he
- distributed the whole among the paupers, and drove the carpenter
- away in great tribulation.'
-
-So much for the story, which is indeed rather long to be quoted in so
-small a book. But listen now to the application:--
-
- 'My beloved, the carpenter is any worldly-minded man; the trunk of
- the tree denotes the human heart, filled with the riches of this
- life. The host is a wise confessor. The cake of earth is the world;
- that of the bones of dead men is the flesh; and that of gold is the
- kingdom of heaven.'
-
-[Chaucer and Boccaccio.]
-
-The modern novel could have no beginning in a literature so far removed
-from ordinary life as the romances, so brief in narration, so pious
-in ideal as the Gesta. Something more of flesh and blood, something
-of coarser grain than dreams, on the one hand, and on the other
-something fuller fleshed than the skeletonic anecdote (however marrowy
-its bones) was needed to produce it. It needed men and women, and it
-needed a more delicate narrative form, portraiture, and the fine art of
-story-telling, Chaucer, and Boccaccio. Chaucer, for all that he wrote
-in verse, was not a _trouveur_ when he was at his best. Boccaccio was
-not a collector of anecdotes. The new classical learning had given them
-humaner outlooks. The attitude of the _Canterbury Tales_ is not that
-of the _Song of Roland_, or the _Morte Darthur_; the attitude of the
-_Decameron_ is not that of the Gesta. Chaucer and Boccaccio, sometimes
-at least, were plain men, pleasantly conscious of their humanity,
-telling stories to amuse their friends.
-
-Chaucer was a middle-class Englishman, Boccaccio a middle-class
-Italian. They both wrote in languages that were scarcely older than
-themselves, in languages that were rather popular than learned. They
-were both in a sense mediators between the classical culture and
-their own people. There the resemblance ends, and their personal
-characters begin to seal the impressions they made on their respective
-literatures. They represent two quite distinct advances in the art of
-story-telling, the one in material, the other in technique. In both of
-them there is a personal honesty of workmanship that makes their work
-their own. The names of the _trouveurs_ are lost, or, at least, not
-connected with what they did. They were workers on a general theme, and
-counted no more in the production of the whole than the thousand men
-who chiselled out each his piece of carving round the arches of Notre
-Dame. They were the tools of their nations. Chaucer and Boccaccio were
-men whose workmanship had its special marks, its private personality.
-They were artists in their own right and not artisans.
-
-[Illustration: GEOFFREY CHAUCER]
-
-[Chaucer.]
-
-Chaucer's was a fairly simple nature. He seems to have taken to
-Renaissance fashions just as he took to Renaissance learning, without
-in the least disturbing the solid Englishness of his foundation. He
-married a Damsell Philippa without letting his marriage interfere with
-an ideal and unrequited passion like that of Petrarch for Laura. He
-had Jean de Meung's own reverence for the classics. 'Go litel book, go
-litel my tragedie,' he says in '_Troilus and Criseyd_,
-
- 'And kiss the steppes, wher-as thou seest pace
- Virgil, Ovyde, Omer, Lucan, and Stace.'
-
-And yet few men have about them less of a classical savour. He may well
-have liked 'at his beddes heed
-
- 'Twenty bokes clad in blak or reed,
- Of Aristotle and his philosophye,'
-
-but he was a man of the true 'Merry England,' when oxen were roasted
-whole on feast-days, and pigs ran in the London streets. He followed
-the Court, but he knew the populace. His father was a vintner in Thames
-Street, and in the Cheapside taverns Chaucer found some of the material
-that his travels and learning taught him how to use. On St. George's
-day 1374 he was granted a pitcher of wine daily for life by his Majesty
-Edward the Third. It is probable that he met Petrarch at Padua. These
-two facts seem to me to present no very hollow portrait of the man.
-
-[Portraiture.]
-
-He brought into the art of story-telling a new clearness of sight in
-looking at other people and at the manners of the time. The romances
-had not represented contemporary life, but rather contemporary ideals.
-No one can pretend to find in Lancelot, in Roland, in Isoud of the
-White Hands, character-sketch or portrait. Lancelot is the perfect
-knight, Roland the perfect warrior, Isoud the beautiful woman. They
-were not a knight, a warrior, a woman. Those who heard the tales used
-the names as servant-girls use names in modern novels of plot, as pegs
-on which to hang their own emotions and their own ambitions. The lady
-who listened with her chin upon her hands as the _trouveurs_ chanted
-before her, took herself the part of Isoud, and gave her lover or the
-lover for whom she hoped the attributes of Tristram. The jack-squire
-listening near the foot of the table himself felt Roland's steed
-between his legs. These names of romance were qualities not people. The
-Wife of Bath is a very different matter.
-
- 'In al the parisshe wyf ne was ther noon
- That to th' offering bifore hir sholde goon;
- And if ther dide, certeyn, so wrooth was she,
- That she was out of alle charitee.
- Hir coverchiefs ful fyne were of ground;
- I dorste swere they weyeden ten pound
- That on a Sonday were upon hir heed.
- Hir hosen weren of fyn scarlet reed,
- Ful streite y-teyd, and shoos ful moiste and newe.
- Bold was hir face, and fair, and reed of hewe.
- She was a worthy womman al hir lyve,
- Housbondes at chirche-dore she hadde fyve,
- Withouten other companye in youthe;
- But therof nedeth nat to speke as nouthe.
- And thryes hadde she been at Jerusalem;
- She hadde passed many a straunge streem;
- At Rome she hadde been, and at Boloigne,
- In Galice at seint Jame, and at Coloigne.
- She coude much of wandring by the weye;
- Gat-tothed was she, soothly for to seye.
- Upon an amblere esily she sat,
- Y-wimpled wel, and on hir heed an hat
- As brood as is a bokeler or a targe;
- A foot-mantel aboute hir hipes large,
- And on hir feet a paire of spores sharpe.
- In felawschip wel coude she laughe and carpe.
- Of remedyes of love she knew perchaunce,
- For she coude of that art the olde daunce.'
-
-She is there, solid, garrulous, herself. She does not get husbands
-because she is a worshipped goddess, but because she is a practical
-woman. Bold indeed would be the lady who in imagination played her
-part. The Wife is no empty fancy dress in which we move and live; she
-is well filled out with her own flesh, and we watch her from outside as
-we would watch a neighbour. Hers is no veil of dreams, but a good and
-costly one, bought at Bristol Fair by one or other of her five husbands
-whom she has badgered into getting it.
-
-Story-tellers before Chaucer seemed scarcely to have realised that men
-were more than good or bad, brave or coward. You hated a man, or you
-loved him, laughed at, or admired him; it never occurred to you to
-observe him. Every man was man, every woman woman. It was not until the
-Renaissance that modern story-telling found one of its motives, which
-is, that there are as many kinds of man and woman as there are men and
-women in the world. Then, at last, character and individuality became
-suddenly important. Passion, reverence, charm had existed before in
-story-telling. To these was now added another possibility of the art
-in portrait painting. So was the modern world differentiated from the
-dark ages; blinking in the unaccustomed light, men began to look at one
-another. In painting, almost simultaneously with literature, the new
-power found expression. The Van Eycks were alive before Chaucer was
-dead, and in the careful, serene painting of 'John Arnolfini and his
-Wife,' is the observant spirit of the _Canterbury Tales_. That woman
-standing there in her miraculously real green robe, her linen neat upon
-her head, her hand laid in her husband's, and her eyes regarding his
-pious, solemn gesture as if she had consented in her own mind to see
-him painted as he wished, and not betray her sense of humour, the man,
-the pattens on the floor, the little dog, and the detailed chandelier,
-are all painted as if in Chaucer's verse. The identity of them is the
-amazing thing; their difference from all the other men and women of
-the town, the difference of their room from all other rooms, and their
-little dog from all other little dogs. To compare that married couple
-with any knight and lady carved in stone, hands folded over breasts, on
-a tomb in an old church, is to compare the modern with the mediæval,
-and the Wife of Bath with Guenevere or the Wife of Sir Segwarides.
-
-[Prose and verse.]
-
-After Chaucer, narrative scarcely developed except in prose. Scott,
-indeed, nearly five centuries later, wrote his first tales in verse,
-but the rhyming story-teller disappeared in the greater author of
-the Waverley Novels.[3] Chaucer himself is interesting for marking
-the transition. He had many attributes of later narrative, in his
-round English humour, in his concern with actual life, although in
-this essay I have only needed him to illustrate the beginnings of the
-portrait-making that has since become so important a byway of the art.
-But while his verse in the _Canterbury Tales_ has the effect of good
-prose, his prose, excellent elsewhere, is here unwieldy and beyond his
-governance. He expressed the new attitude in the old way; but when he
-was only nine years old, there had been written in Italy prose tales
-that have hardly been excelled as examples of the two forms of the
-short story. Chaucer was born in 1340. In 1349 Boccaccio finished the
-_Decameron_.
-
-[Boccaccio.]
-
-Boccaccio had a more intricate mind than Chaucer's, and a more
-elaborate life. He is said to have been an illegitimate son of a
-Florentine merchant and a Frenchwoman, and the two nations certainly
-seem to have contributed to his character. He spent six years of his
-youth apprenticed to a merchant in Paris, forsook business, and was
-sent to learn law, and only in the end persuaded his father to let him
-devote himself to books. He had a knowledge of the world uncommon even
-in his day, and a knowledge of letters that was rare. He was something
-of a scholar, something of a courtier, and, particularly, something of
-a poet. Sentence after sentence in the _Decameron_ glides by like a
-splash of sunlight on a stream with floating blossoms. I must quote
-one of his poems in Rossetti's most beautiful translation:--
-
- 'By a clear well, within a little field
- Full of green grass and flowers of every hue,
- Sat three young girls, relating (as I knew)
- Their loves. And each had twined a bough to shield
- Her lovely face; and the green leaves did yield
- The golden hair their shadow; while the two
- Sweet colours mingled, both blown lightly through
- With a soft wind for ever stirred and still'd.
- After a little while one of them said
- (I heard her), 'Think! If, ere the next hour struck,
- Each of our lovers should come here to-day,
- Think you that we should fly or feel afraid?'
- To whom the others answered, 'From such luck
- A girl would be a fool to run away.'
-
-He could write a poem like that; he could write the _Decameron_; he
-could write books of greater impropriety; and at the end of his life
-could beg his friends to leave such books alone, devoting himself to
-the compilation of ponderous works of classical learning. There is
-a legend of a deathbed vision of Judgment where Boccaccio figured,
-which, being reported to him, nearly gave the wit, the scholar, and the
-gallant the additional mask of the Carthusian religious.
-
-[Illustration: GIOVANNI BOCCACCIO]
-
-But the Boccaccio of the _Decameron_ was the mature young man, of
-personal beauty, and nimble tongue, a Dioneo, who had his own way
-with the company in which he found himself, and was licensed, like a
-professional jester, to say the most scandalous things. He knew the
-rich colour, classical learning, and jollity of morals of the Court
-of Naples. Here he heard the travelling story-tellers, and perhaps
-learnt from them a little of the art of narrative. He knew the _Gesta
-Romanorum_, and began to collect tales himself with the idea of making
-some similar collection. Noting story after story that he heard told
-(for it would be ridiculous to reason from the widespread origin of
-his tales that he had a stupendous knowledge of the world's books),
-he wrote them with a perfect feeling for value and proportion. In
-him the story-teller ceased to be an improviser. In his tales the
-longwindedness of the _trouveurs_ was gone, gone also the nakedness
-of the anecdote. He refused to excuse them with the moral tags of
-the Gesta. These new forms were not things of utility that needed
-justification; they were things of independent beauty.
-
-[His story-telling.]
-
-Boccaccio was intent simply on the art of telling tales. He knew enough
-of classical literature to feel the possible dignity and permanence of
-prose, and he told his stories as they were told to him in a supple,
-pleasant vernacular that obeyed him absolutely and never led him off by
-its own strangeness into byways foreign to the tales and to himself.
-He found his material in anecdotes of current gossip, like Cecco
-Angiolieri's misadventure with his money, his palfrey, and his clothes,
-and in popular tales like that of the overpatient Griselda. He took
-it in the rough and shaped it marvellously, creating two forms, the
-short story proper, the skilful development of a single episode, and
-the little novel, the French _nouvelle_, a tale whose incidents are
-many and whose plot may be elaborate. From his day to our own these two
-forms have scarcely altered, and in the use of both of them he showed
-that invaluable art, so strenuously attained by later story-tellers, of
-compelling us to read with him to the end, even if we know it, for the
-mere joy of narrative, the delight of his narrating presence. We are
-so well content with Chaucer's gorgeous improvisations that we never
-ask whether this piece or that is relevant to the general theme. But in
-Boccaccio there are no irrelevancies, praise that can be given to few
-story-tellers before the time of the self-conscious construction of men
-like Poe, and the austere selection of men like Mérimée and Flaubert.
-
-[Importance of framework in books of short tales.]
-
-Even without their setting his tales would have been something
-memorable, something that lifted the art to a new level and made less
-loving workmanship an obvious backsliding. But stories put together do
-not make good books. The _Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles_ are very short and
-make a collection of anecdotes. The _Exemplary Novels_ of Cervantes
-are very long and stand and fall each one alone. But the _Canterbury
-Tales_ are the better for that merry company on pilgrimage. And when
-Queen Joan of Naples, profligate, murderess, and bluestocking, asked
-Boccaccio to put his stories in a book, it was well that he should have
-the plague of 1348 to set as purple velvet underneath his gems--the
-morality inseparable from the tales was so simple and so careless.
-Boccaccio's attitude was that of his age. Man has wants: if he can
-satisfy them, good: if not, why then it may ease his sorrow to hear it
-professionally expressed:--'Help me,' as Chaucer says:--
-
- 'Help me that am the sorwful instrument
- That helpeth lovers, as I can, to pleyne!'
-
-As for good fortune, it is taken as naïvely as by the topers in the
-song:--
-
- 'Maults gone down, maults gone down
- From an old angel to a French crown.
- And every drunkard in this town
- Is very glad that maults gone down.'
-
-When Troilus is happy with Cressida, Chaucer smiles aside:--'With worse
-hap God let us never mete.' And Boccaccio, after describing a scene
-that in England at the present day would be the prelude to a case at
-law, and columns of loathsomely prurient newspaper reports, ejaculates
-with simple piety:--'God grant us the like.' The _Decameron_ owes
-much of its dignity and permanence to its double frame, to the Court
-of Story-telling in the garden on the hill, and to the deeper irony
-that places it, sweet, peaceful, and insouciant, in the black year of
-pestilence and death.
-
-
-
-
-THE ROGUE NOVEL
-
-
-
-
-THE ROGUE NOVEL
-
-
-[Democracy in literature.]
-
-FEW characters in literature have had so large or so honourable a
-progeny as the gutter-snipe. If the Kings' daughters of High Romance,
-charming, delicate creatures, had only wedded with Kings' sons, as
-delicately fashioned as themselves, we should never have known the
-sterling dynasty of the Tom Joneses and the Humphry Clinkers, with
-their honest hearts and coarse hides warranted to wear. All those Kings
-of men, whose thrones were beer-barrels, whose sceptres, oaken cudgels,
-whose perennial counsellor was Jollity, whose enemy, Introspection,
-would never have come to their own, and indeed would never have been
-born, if it had not been for the sixteenth century entry of the rascal
-into the Palace gardens, for the escapades of such shaggy-headed,
-smutfaced, barefooted urchins as Lazarillo de Tormes.
-
-To such rogues as he must be attributed much of our present humanity;
-for until we could laugh at those of low estate, we held them of
-little account. There is small mention made of serving-men in the
-_Morte Darthur_ or the _Mabinogion_, and when, in the _Heptameron_ of
-Margaret of Navarre, we hear of the drowning of a number of them in
-trying to render easy the passage of their masters through the floods,
-the comment is extremely short: 'One must not despair for the loss of
-servants, for they are easy to replace.' On a similar occasion 'all
-the company were filled with a joy inestimable, praising the Creator,
-who, contenting himself with serving-men, had saved the masters and
-mistresses,' an index alike to the ferocity they still attributed to
-God and the rather exclusive humanity of themselves. Do you not think
-with sudden awe of the revolution to come? Do you not hear a long way
-off the trampling of a million serving-men, prepared to satisfy God
-with other lives? It is a fine contrast to turn from these queenly
-sentences to this little book, the autobiography of a beggar, who
-thinks himself sufficiently important to set down the whole truth about
-his birth, lest people should make any mistake. 'My father, God be
-kind to him, had for fifteen years a mill on the river of Tormes....
-I was scarcely eight when he was accused of having, with evil intent,
-made leakage in his check sacks.... Letting himself be surprised, he
-confessed all, and suffered patiently the chastisement of justice,
-which makes me hope that he is, according to the Gospel, of the number
-of those happy in the Glory of God.' No very reputable parentage this,
-in a day when it was the fashion to derive heroes from Charlemagne or
-Amadis.
-
-[_Lazarillo de Tormes._]
-
-It is a short step from the ironic to the sincere. The author of the
-book is laughing at his hero, and makes a huge joke of his pretensions.
-But to recognise, even in jest, that a vagabond rogue could have
-pretensions, or indeed any personal character at all beyond that of a
-tool in the hand of whoever was kind enough to use him, was to look
-upon him with a humaner eye and, presently, to recognise him in earnest
-as a fellow creature. It seems to me significant that the first rogues
-in our literature should come from Spain, a country that has never
-quite forgotten its Moorish occupation. In the Spanish student, who, so
-tradition says, wrote _Lazarillo_ while in the University of Salamanca,
-there must have been something of the spirit of the race that lets the
-hunchback tell his story to the Caliph, and is glad when the son of the
-barber marries the daughter of the Grand Vizier. For, joke as it is,
-the book is the story of a beggar, told as a peculiarly fearless and
-brazen beggar would tell it, without suggesting or demanding either
-condescension or pity.
-
-[The morality of the underworld.]
-
-There is genius in the little book. Its author perhaps did better than
-he meant, for he brings on every page the moral atmosphere of the
-underworld, the old folk-morality, the same in sixteenth-century Spain
-as in the oldest tales of sagacity and cunning. Lazarillo's shameless
-mother apprentices him to a blind beggar who promises to treat him like
-a son and begins his education at once. He takes the boy to a big
-stone on the outskirts of the town, and bids him listen to the noise
-within it. The boy puts his head close to the stone to hear the better,
-and the old rascal gives him a thundering blow, which, the stone being
-an admirable anvil, nearly cracks his skull. That is his first lesson
-... never to be unsuspicious ... and it is as characteristic of the
-others as of _Reynard the Fox_.
-
-There never was so excellent a beggar as Lazarillo's master; no trick
-of the trade was unknown to him. As a fortune-teller, he could prophesy
-what his victims wished to hear. As a doctor he had his remedies for
-toothache, and for fainting-fits; not an illness could be mentioned
-but he had a physic ready to his hands. Then too, 'he knew by heart
-more prayers than all the blind men of Spain. He recited them very
-distinctly, in a low tone, grave and clear, calling the attention of
-the whole church; he accompanied them with a posture humble and devout,
-without gesticulations or grimaces of mouth, after the manner of those
-blind men who have not been properly brought up.' Indeed his only fault
-was avarice. 'He was not content with making me die of hunger,' says
-his pupil; 'he was doing the same himself.'
-
-Under such a master Lazarillo's wits sharpen quickly. 'A fool would
-have been dead a hundred times; but by my subtlety and my good
-tricks, I always, or mostly (in spite of all his care), succeeded
-in getting hold of the biggest and best portion.' Lazarillo becomes
-as astute a rascal as his teacher, and, living fairly and squarely
-in the conditions of the underworld, his villainy does not damp his
-spirits, or disturb his peace of nights. I was reminded of him by a
-young tramp with whom I walked in the north country, a rogue with as
-merry a heart as he, and a similar well-fitting morality. With me, from
-whom he knew there was nothing to gain but good fellowship, he was a
-good fellow, walked with a merry stride, whistled as he went, sang me
-songs in the Gaelic of his childhood, and told me of the jolly tricks
-he had played with a monkey he had brought from over sea. We walked
-like men in the sunshine. But when, beyond a turn in the road, he saw
-some person coming a little better dressed, why then his face flashed
-into a winking melancholy, his stride degenerated as if by magic into
-a slouch, and it was odd if his mean figure and despairing hand did
-not attract a copper, for which he would call down a blessing. Then,
-as soon as we were out of sight of his benefactor, he would resume his
-natural walk and burst again into whistling and merriment. Lazarillo
-is as frank as he. He recognises his needs (Hunger is not an easy
-fellow to ignore), and would be much surprised if you denied his right
-to satisfy them. Nor is he disappointed in you. Every honest man must
-love a rogue, and you are as consciencelessly glad as himself when
-Lazarillo, by kneeling before him and sucking the liquor through a
-straw, diddles the blind man who greedily guards the wine bowl between
-his ragged knees. You feel that he has but his due when he happens
-upon a wife and a living and (if you read the continuation of his
-history[4]) find nothing blameworthy in the fact that he spends his
-last years in the clothes and reputation of a dead hermit, subsisting
-on the charity of the religious.
-
-[The form of the rogue novel.]
-
-I have talked at some length about the contents of this little book in
-order to illustrate the new material then brought into story-telling.
-Let me now consider the new form that came with it. _Lazarillo de
-Tormes_ was a very simple development from the plain anecdote or merry
-quip of folklore or gossip, which was, as we have seen in the last
-chapter, one of the popular early forms of narrative. Boccaccio raised
-the anecdote to a higher level of art by giving it a fuller technique
-and expanding it into the short story. The inventors of the rogue
-novels achieved a similar result by stringing a number of anecdotes
-together about a particular hero, making as it were cycles of anecdotes
-comparable in their humbler way with the grand cycles of romance.
-Lazarillo himself is not an elaborate conception, but simply a fit
-rogue to play the main part in a score or so of roguish exploits, idly
-following one another as they occurred to the mind of the narrator. His
-life is a jest-book turned into a biography, a collection of anecdotes
-metamorphosed into a novel.
-
-[Its satirical material.]
-
-The new form gave story-telling a wider scope. In writing a collection
-of anecdotes it was difficult to realise the hero who was no more than
-a name that happened to be common to them all. It was impossible to
-make much of the minor characters who walk on or off the tiny stage of
-each adventure. But in stringing them along a biography, in producing
-instead of a number of embroidered exploits a single embroidered life,
-there need be no limit to the choice and elaboration of the embroidery.
-Though the hero was no more than a quality, a puppet guaranteed to
-jump on the pull of a string, the setting of his life turned easily
-into a satirical picture of contemporary existence, and satire became
-eventually one of the principal aims with which such novels were
-written.
-
-The low estate of the rogue novel's hero made satire from his lips
-not only easy but palatable. In writing the opinions of a rogue you
-can politely assume that his standpoint is not that of his readers.
-For that reason they can applaud the rascal's wit playing over other
-people, or, if it touches them too closely, regard it with compassion
-as lions might listen to the criticism of jackals. _Lazarillo_
-contains plenty of good-humoured, bantering portraits: the seller
-of forged indulgences, the miserly priest, and particularly the
-out-at-elbows gentleman who walks abroad each day to lunch with a
-rich friend, and is unable on his return from his hungry promenade to
-keep from eyeing, and at last from sharing, the rough bread that his
-servant has begged or stolen for himself. Lazarillo's merit is that he
-writes of himself _à propos_ of other people, and never barrenly of
-himself for his own sake. Smollett in writing _Roderick Random_ is true
-to his traditions in getting his own back from schoolmasters and the
-Navy Office. And the arms of Dickens, who reformed the workhouses in
-telling the story of Oliver Twist, must have had quartered upon them
-the rampant begging bowl of the little Spanish rogue.
-
-Now the characteristic language of satire is as pointed as the blade
-of a rapier, and for this we owe some gratitude to these rascally
-autobiographies whose plainness of style was nearer talk than that
-of any earlier form of narrative. The prose of the picaresque novel
-has been in every age remarkably free from the literary tricks most
-fashionable at the time. When your hero dresses in rags you cannot
-do better than clothe his opinions in simplicity. The writing of
-_Lazarillo_, of _Tom Jones_, of _Captain Singleton_, of _Lavengro_,
-is clear, virile, not at all ornate, the exact opposite to that of
-the Pastorals. Such heroes deliver their sentences, like Long Melford,
-straight from the shoulder, and would consider fine writing as so much
-aimless trifling in the air.
-
-[Picaresque autobiographies.]
-
-Mention of _Lavengro_ suggests a paragraph on one of the most curious
-developments to be noticed in the history of the art. All that we have
-examined so far have been from truth to fiction; this is a movement
-from fiction to truth. Stories of the deeds of a man have become
-romances of the deeds of a hero. A biography has changed as we watched
-it into a tale of miracle. Here is a quite different phenomenon. An
-imaginary autobiography that pretends to be real, of a rascally hero,
-makes it possible for rogues to write real autobiographies that pretend
-to be imaginary. _Lavengro_ and the _Romany Rye_ are two parts of a
-rogue novel constructed like the oldest of the kind. They contain a
-hero somehow put on a different plane from that of respectable society,
-and the books are made up of the people he meets and the things they
-say and do to him, or make him do and say. 'Why,' says Borrow, whose
-attitude towards life is as confident as Lazarillo's, 'there is not a
-chapter in the present book which is not full of adventures, with the
-exception of the present one, and this is not yet terminated.'
-
-[The development of the rogue novel.]
-
-But Borrow and other makers of confessions are not of the direct
-line, in spite of the roguish and adventurous air that clings about
-them as they rest upon our shelves. _Lazarillo_ had many sincerer and
-more immediate flatterers--Thomas Nash, for example, whose _Jacke
-Wilton, or the Unfortunate Traveller_, holds in itself, as one of the
-earliest pieces of realism in English literature, more than enough
-of interest for an essay. He had also many younger brothers at home,
-and an enormous progeny, and it has so happened that the influence of
-the rogue novel on our own fiction was exerted through them, and not
-through his early imitations in France and England. Cervantes used its
-form for the adventures of Don Quixote and Sancho Panza, and, combining
-the picaresque spirit with that of the tales of chivalry, produced the
-first realistic romance. Many lesser writers were content to follow
-Lazarillo's lead without such independent ingenuity. They brought up
-their literary children to be heroes after Lazarillo's fashion and
-were proud to have him as a godfather. In their hands the rogue novel
-retained its form and gained only a multiplicity of incident, a hundred
-writers earnestly devising new swindles and more exciting adventures
-for the hero, whose personality under all their buffetings remained
-constant to its original characteristics. No nation has shown more
-fertility in fancy than the Spanish. We owe to Spain half the trap-door
-excitements, half the eavesdropping discoveries, half the ingenious
-plots and counter-plots of the theatre. And when we remember that
-for a hundred and fifty years the rogue novel had been one of the most
-popular forms of Spanish literature, we need not wonder that Le Sage,
-in turning over volume after volume of the lives of Spanish rascals,
-should find that the Spanish language was an Open Sesame to an Ali
-Baba's cave of opulent invention. Just as a hundred forgotten trouveurs
-chanted the tales of the _Morte Darthur_, before Malory made from their
-songs the epic that we know, so the rogue novel had seeded and repeated
-itself again and again, before it met its great man who seized the
-vitality of a hundred bantlings to make a breeched book.
-
-[Illustration: ALAIN RENÉ LE SAGE]
-
-[Its culmination in Le Sage.]
-
-Just as Malory was not a Frenchman but an Englishman, so Le Sage was
-not a Spaniard but a Frenchman, and a Frenchman in a very different age
-from that which produced his models. The
-
- 'Stately Spanish galleons
- Sailing from the Isthmus,
- Dipping through the tropics by the palm green shores,
- With cargoes of diamonds,
- Emeralds, amethysts,
- Topazes and cinnamon and gold moidores,'[5]
-
-no longer brought the wealth of the Incas to Cadiz and Barcelona,
-but had been burnt as firewood in the cabins on the Irish coast. The
-Elizabethan age had come and gone. Cervantes had been dead a hundred
-years. Molière had brought comedy to the French stage. Watteau was
-painting, and Boileau was formulating the eighteenth-century code of
-letters, when in a little garden summer-house behind a Paris street, Le
-Sage sat at his desk, dipped through Spanish books, and wrote with a
-light heart of the people that he knew, disguised in foreign clothes,
-and moving in places he had never seen. He made his travels by his
-own fireside, and the contrast between Cervantes' active life and his
-peaceable _Galatea_ is no greater than that between the adventurous Gil
-Blas and Le Sage's sedentary industry. His lack of personal experience
-left him very free in the handling of his material, and made him just
-the man to recast the old adventures of a century before, to translate
-them, spilling none of their vitality, to a later time, to fill them
-out with a more delicate fancy, to finish them with a more fastidious
-pen, and to build from them a new and delicious French book, Spanish in
-colouring, but wholly Parisian in appeal.
-
-Gil Blas is a Frenchman in a Spanish cloak, Le Sage, as he imagined
-himself under the tattered mantle of Lazarillo. His disguise left him
-doubly licensed for the criticism of contemporary France. He was of
-low estate, so that he could see things from below, upside down, and
-comment upon them. His circumstances were Spanish, so that he could
-observe French things, call them by Spanish names, and laugh at them
-without being inexcusably impertinent. He had also a very excellent
-technique. Le Sage had read La Bruyère and La Bruyère's translation of
-Theophrastus, and was the better able to allow his hero to take the
-hint from Lazarillo, and use his autobiography as an outlet for his
-social satire. Everything that Lazarillo had done, Gil Blas did in a
-larger and more skilful fashion. The book summed up the rogue novels in
-itself, and in its own right brought their influence to bear on English
-narrative. Smollett translated it, and it shares with _Don Quixote_ the
-parentage of the masculine novel.
-
-
-
-
-THE ELIZABETHANS
-
-
-
-
-THE ELIZABETHANS
-
-
-[The new conditions of professional story-telling.]
-
-PROFESSIONAL story-tellers before the sixteenth century seem very far
-removed from the novelists of our circulating libraries. Theirs was
-a simpler patronage; they had but to please one rich man, and they
-could live. The invention of printing made them leap suddenly into the
-conditions of modernity. It changed the audience of the castle hall
-into the audience of the world, and patrons into the public. A man told
-his stories in his own room. He was not sure of a single listener; he
-might have ten thousand without raising his voice or pressing harder
-with his pen. Poets might write for their friends or the Court; but
-Elizabethan story-tellers were already able to exist by writing for
-the booksellers. Middlemen were between their audience and themselves.
-They had no chance of excusing the defects of their wares by charm
-of voice or charm of personality, unless they could get that charm
-on paper. The characteristics of modern story-telling were rapidly
-appearing; already, as in the case of _Euphues_, a single book might
-set the fashion for a thousand; already the novelist felt his audience
-through his sales. Men like Greene, swift 'yarkers up' of pamphlets,
-had to write what the Elizabethan public wanted--with the result that
-there is very little purely English story-telling of the period. The
-Elizabethans wanted silks and gold from overseas. They fell in love
-with what was new and strange. They were hungry for all countries but
-their own, and for all times but those in which they lived. There never
-were such thieves. They stole from Spain, from France, from Italy, from
-Portugal, and, curiously mixing impudence and awe, copied crudely and
-continually from a newly discovered antiquity.
-
-[Elizabethan borrowings.]
-
-There was _Paynter's Pallace_, peopled with characters from the
-love-tales of France and Italy, in whose adventures Elizabethan
-playwrights found a score of plots. And then there was _Pettie's
-Pallace_, with its delightful title, _A petite Pallace of Pettie his
-pleasure_, that shows how late our language lost its French. Pettie
-steals his tales from the classics, with a most engaging air of right
-of way. Wherever the Elizabethans went they carried their heads high
-and were not abashed. They were ready to nod to Cæsar, call Endymion
-a Johnny-head-in-air, and clink a glass in honour of Ulysses. All
-the world was so new that Antiquity seemed only yesterday. Classical
-allusion was used with the most lavish hand. Progne, inveighing against
-her husband, explains his iniquity as follows:--
-
- 'He sheweth his cursed cruel kind, he plainly proves himself to
- proceed of the progeny of that traitor Aeneas, who wrought the
- confusion of Queen Dido, who succoured him in his distress. It is
- evident he is engendered of Jason's race, who disloyally forsook
- Medea that made him win the golden fleece! He is descended of
- the stock of Demophoon, who through his faithless dealing forced
- Phyllis to hang herself! He seems of the seed of Theseus, who
- left Ariadne in the deserts to be devoured, through whose help he
- subdued the monster Minotaur, and escaped out of the intricate
- labyrinth! He cometh of Nero his cruel kind, who carnally abused
- his own mother Agrippina, and then caused her to be slain and
- ripped open, that he might see the place wherein he lay being an
- infant in her belly! So that what but filthiness is to be gathered
- of such grafts? What boughs but beastliness grow out of such stems?'
-
-And yet, quite undismayed by such family connections, so intimate was
-he with antiquity, the story-teller sums up the deeds of his characters
-as though he were a prosecuting counsel, and they even now cowering in
-the dock before him.
-
- 'It were hard here, Gentlewoman, for you to give sentence, who more
- offended of the husband or the wife, seeing the doings of both the
- one and the other near in the highest degree of devilishness--such
- unbridled lust and beastly cruelty in him, such monstrous mischief
- and murder in her; in him such treason, in her such treachery; in
- him such falseness, in her such furiousness; in him such devilish
- desire, in her such revengeful ire; in him such devilish heat,
- in her such haggish hate, that I think them both worthy to be
- condemned to the most bottomless pit in hell.'
-
-[Lyly writes for women.]
-
-There is something in the style of this, as well as in the address to
-a female reader, that suggests the _Euphues_ of John Lyly, published
-two years later. Lyly, alchemist of Spanish magniloquence into English
-euphuism, who settled the style of the Elizabethan romance, and brought
-into it many elements still characteristic of English story-telling,
-wrote as well as his letter to 'Gentlemen Readers,' and to his 'verrie
-good friends, the Gentlemen Schollers of Oxford,' Epistles dedicatory
-to women--'To the Ladies and Gentlewoemen of England, John Lyly wisheth
-what they would.' They were grateful to him, and since he said that he
-would rather 'lye shut in a Ladye's Casket, then open in a Scholler's
-studie,' there was scarce a gentlewoman in London but knew much of him
-by heart, addressed her husband or lover in terms his Lucia might have
-used, and woke nearly as eager to read in him as in her looking-glass.
-His was a very modern success. Then, too, the end of all his tales
-was high morality. He winds up each with a reflection, and like most
-English story-telling, they contain more of the Warning Example than of
-the Embroidered Exploit. He reminds the 'Gentlewoemen of England' that
-he has 'diligently observed that there shall be nothing found that may
-offend the chaste mind with unseemly tearmes or uncleanly talke.' And
-yet he wrote of love a hundred years before the eighteenth century,
-and throughout those hundred years, and for some fifty afterwards,
-the chaste mind was to be almost disregarded. Mrs. Aphra Behn was
-to pour forth what Swinburne called her 'weltering sewerage,' and
-Fielding and Smollett were to write, before the chaste mind was to
-exert any very lasting influence on literature. Fielding and Smollett
-wrote for men, while, like an earlier Richardson, 'could Euphues take
-the measure of a woman's minde, as the Tailour doth of hir bodie, he
-would go as neere to fit them for a fancie as the other doth for a
-fashion.' Elizabethan women must have been less squeamish than their
-descendants on the subject of themselves. For in this book planned to
-fit them, Lyly writes like an Elizabethan Schopenhauer:--'Take from
-them their periwigges, their paintings, their Jewells, their rowles,
-their boulstrings, and thou shalt soone perceive that a woman is the
-least part of hir selfe.' That is the gentle art of being rude, in
-which so much of early wit consisted. But, as it was designed as a
-'Cooling Carde for Philautus and all fond lovers,' whose affections
-were misplaced or unrequited, the women, accepting not without pride
-responsibility for the disease, must have found it easy to forgive him
-and to smile at so impotent a cure.
-
-[Euphuism.]
-
-The style of Euphues had a much wider influence than his matter. Like
-Pettie's, it is precious, but with a preciousness at the same time
-so elaborate and infectious that I am finding it difficult even now,
-in thinking about it, to keep from imitating it. Its principle is a
-battledore-and-shuttlecock motion, in which the sense, sometimes a
-little bruised, is kept up between similar sounds or words that are
-not quite puns but nearly so. An idea that could be expressed in a
-single very short sentence is expanded as long as the breath lasts,
-or longer, by the insertion of separate contrasts, like those used in
-the intermediate lines of one of the forms of Japanese poetry. There
-was something of this in Pettie's peroration that was quoted three
-paragraphs ago; and here is an example from Lyly:--'Alas, Euphues, by
-how much the more I love the high clymbing of thy capacitie, by so much
-the more I feare thy fall.' (There is the idea; all that follows is its
-embroidery.) 'The fine Christall is sooner erased then the hard Marble;
-the greenest Beech burneth faster then the dryest Oke; the fairest
-silke is soonest soyled; and the sweetest wine tourneth to the sharpest
-Vinegar. The Pestilence doth most infect the clearest complection, and
-the Caterpiller cleaveth into the ripest fruite: the most delycate
-witte is allured with small enticement unto vice, and most subject to
-yeelde unto vanitie.'
-
-['Cruditie and indigestion.']
-
-Such a style could not but attract a newly educated people, still able
-to marvel at knowledge. Its lavishness of information is comparable
-to that generosity of gold and precious gems that has been noticed as
-characteristic of the writers of the _Mabinogion_. The Briton wondered
-at wealth, the Elizabethan at learning. It is not surprising that in
-this state of civilisation a fact-laden style should be brought to
-perfection. 'It is a sign of cruditie and indigestion,' says Montaigne,
-'for a man to yeelde up his meat even as he swallowed the same: the
-stomach hath not wrought his full operation unlesse it have changed
-forme and altered fashion of that which was given him to boyle and
-concoct.' In Elizabethan England, when knowledge was so new and so
-delightful that men did not scruple to invent it, it is easy to imagine
-John Lyly writing with a huge Bestiary open to the left of him, and
-a classical dictionary open to the right, from which he might dig
-out metaphors learned and ingenious, and present them immediately to
-his readers without putting any undue strain on his own intellectual
-digestion.
-
-[Lyly's followers.]
-
-His imitators were no less numerous than his readers. If they could
-not write they talked his peculiar language. If they were novelists
-they wrote in something like his manner, and with cheerful consciences
-used his name as a trade-mark to attract his popularity to themselves.
-Lodge's _Rosalynde_ is introduced as _Euphues' Golden Legacie_, and
-many other stories were connected by some ingenious silken thread to
-Lyly's garlanded triumphal car. It is too easy to laugh at euphuism.
-It was the first prophecy of the ordered poetic prose in which such
-delicate work has been done in our own time. In the hands of Lodge and
-Greene, who tempered it with homelier periods, it showed at once its
-possibilities of beauty. Nor with Lyly was it continued pedantry. A
-golden smile appears sometimes beneath the mask. Euphues, crossing to
-England, tells the story of Callimachus to Philautus and the sailors,
-and when he says, 'You must imagine (because it were too long to
-tell all his journey) that he was Sea-sick (as thou beginnest to be,
-Philautus),' we perceive that Lyly is not always to be hidden behind
-his sentences. The stories he introduces, the tale of Callimachus and
-Cassander, or the pretty history of old Fidus and his Issida, are as
-pleasant as the tales of Lodge and Greene.
-
-How near he was to being a story-teller may be seen from the work of
-these two men. They tried to imitate him in everything; but Greene
-wrote in a hurry for the press, and you could not expect Lodge, writing
-on the high seas, to be as consistently euphuistical as an Oxford
-gentleman, holding an appointment from Lord Burleigh, and having
-nothing else to do. Euphuism fell away from both journalist and sailor,
-leaving a pleasant glow over their style. They were more intent than
-Lyly on the plain forwarding of the narrative. For the long rhetorical
-harangues they substituted shorter, simpler speeches to express the
-feelings of their characters. The harangue was a step from the bald
-statement that so-and-so 'made great dole,' and these shorter speeches
-were a further step from the by no means bald declamations on the
-subject of the dole, towards the working up of emotion by a closer
-copy of the action and dialogue in which emotion expresses itself.
-Dialogue was yet to be introduced from the theatre. In Lyly it meant
-argument, but in the best of his imitators it had become already a tool
-imperfectly understood but sometimes used for the actual progress of
-the tale.
-
-Greene and Lodge illustrate very well the characteristics of
-Elizabethan story-telling. _Pandosto_, _Rosalynde_, and some of
-Greene's confessions let us know pretty clearly what it was that the
-public of the day found interesting. Greene was a Bohemian, 'with a
-jolley red peaked beard' who could 'yark up a pamphlet in a single
-night,' and do it so well that the booksellers were glad to pay 'for
-the very dregs of his wit.' Lodge was an undergraduate at Oxford, a
-pirate, and later a very successful physician. Both were, like their
-audiences, exceedingly alive.
-
-[Romance and confession.]
-
-In Greene's _Pandosto_ we find reminiscences of old romance, classical
-nomenclature, the influence of the Italian _novelle_, and plenty of the
-wild improbability that still had power over his audience. _Pandosto_
-is a love pamphlet, and after a euphuistic dedication and a little
-preface on jealousy, 'from which oft ensueth bloody revenge as this
-ensuing history manifestly proveth,' Greene leads off with, 'In the
-country of Bohemia there reigned a king called Pandosto.' Bohemia
-is an island--no matter. Pandosto, in a most obliging manner, 'to
-close up the comedy with a tragical stratagem,' slays himself at the
-finish--no matter again. We must remember that for the Elizabethans,
-fortunate people who believed in the Lamia and the Boas, probability
-and improbability had no existence as relative terms. Everything was
-credible, and one of the joys of romance reading was the exercise of
-an athletic faith. Another was the gathering of knowledge, and Greene
-met this demand with books whose breathings of realism illustrate, like
-Nash's _Jacke Wilton_, the rogue novel in England, and give his name
-a double importance. These other books were more personal to their
-writer, and depend more closely on his own life and character. Greene
-was a wild liver with a conscience. He enjoyed debauch and the company
-of rogues better than virtue and the society of sober citizens. But
-his conscience oscillated between hibernation and wakefulness with
-a periodicity that corresponded to the fulness and emptiness of his
-purse, and in times of poverty and righteousness he wrote confessions
-of his own misdoing, and books on the methods of rapscallions with whom
-he consorted, that brought him the money to continue on his riotous
-career, and satisfied the curiosity of his public as well as his
-romances had delighted their imaginations.
-
-Lodge, although his work was also various, appealed mainly to the
-latter.
-
- 'Roome for a souldier and a sailer that gives you the fruits of his
- labors that he wrote, in the ocean, when everie line was wet with a
- surge, and every humorous passion countercheckt with a storme. If
- you like it, so; and yet I will be yours in duetie, if you be mine
- in favour. But if Momus, or any squinteied asse, that hath mighty
- eares to conceive with Midas, and yet little reason to judge, if
- he come abord our barke to find fault with the tackling, when hee
- knowes not the shrowds, Ile down into the hold, and fetch out a
- rustie pollax, that sawe no sunne this seaven yeare, and either
- well bebast him, or heave the cockescombe over boord to feed cods.
- But curteous gentlemen, that favour most, backbite none, and pardon
- what is overslipt, let such come and welcome; Ile into the stewards
- roome, and fetch them a kanne of our best bevradge.'
-
-[_As You Like It._]
-
-That is the way in which Thomas Lodge, newly returned to England from
-piracies on the western seas, introduces his _Rosalynde_. With such a
-preface, you would expect a ruffianly tale, full of hard knocks and
-coarse words, certainly not the dainty little pastoral, romantic fairy
-story, found in Euphues' cell, and holding lessons of much profit for
-the guidance of his friend's children. The very contrast between its
-buccaneering author and its own fragility is the same as that between
-the pastoral writers and their books, between, for example, Cervantes
-of Lepanto and the author of the _Galatea_, between the Sidney who died
-at Zutphen and the author of _Arcadia_. It is the tale of _As You Like
-It_, and Shakespeare, in turning it into a play, chose the right title
-for it, since it contains every one of the surest baits with which to
-hook an Elizabethan audience. It was brought from overseas, and in that
-time when ships were sailing up to London Bridge with all the new-found
-riches of the world, the hint of travel was a sufficient promise of
-delight. It begins with a dying knight who leaves a legacy between his
-sons, and its audience had not yet tired of Sir Bevis and Sir Isumbras.
-It has the fairy-tale notion of the youngest born, and was not England
-youngest son of all the world? There are beautiful women in it, and one
-of them dresses like a man--a delicious, romantic thing to dream upon.
-And finally, is it not left by Euphues himself, and therefore full of
-profit as of pleasure, of wit as of wisdom, and written in something
-not too far from that embroidered manner, as dear to the Elizabethans
-as their new won luxuries, their newly imported frivolities.
-
-
-
-
-THE PASTORAL
-
-
-
-
-THE PASTORAL
-
-
-[The discovery and exploitation of Arcadia.]
-
-THE Pastoral, whose influence touches even the Elizabethan novels not
-professedly Arcadian, had been fished up from sunken antiquity by the
-early scholars of the Renaissance. They were fascinated by the serene
-country pieces of Virgil, and the leafy embroideries of Theocritus, and
-were, of course, too newly learned, too eager for the name of learning,
-to be able to apply the old form to their own material. Instead, they
-did their best to write not only in a classical manner, but also of a
-classical country. They used Greek names, Latin names, any but homespun
-names of their own times. It was not on purpose that Arcadia was set by
-them in the Golden Age; they had aimed at a century more prosaic. The
-best time of all the world had a date for them, and they did their best
-to live up to its particular antiquity. But in using conventions so
-different from real life, in a time of hurry and stress, it was natural
-that they should be led into daydreams of a greater simplicity than
-their own elaborate existence. It was natural, too, that by refining
-character, tempering the wind, and keeping the year at its sweetest
-season, they should end in the making of books that were beyond all
-measure artificial. From the time of Boccaccio to the time of Cervantes
-these books had multiplied, and become more and more like arrangements
-of marionettes in landscapes dotted with Noah's Ark trees, until,
-when the curate in Don Quixote's library defends them to the niece
-and calls them 'ingenious books that can do nobody any prejudice,'
-the niece hurriedly replies, 'Oh! good sir, burn them with the rest I
-beseech you; for should my uncle get cured of his knight-errant frenzy,
-and betake himself to the reading of these books, we should have him
-turn shepherd, and so wander through the woods and fields; nay, and
-what would be worse yet, turn poet, which they say is a catching and
-incurable disease.'
-
-[Shepherds' plaints.]
-
-The niece was right, for when shepherds love sweet shepherdesses, it
-seems that for the benefit of a Renaissance public they must pour their
-sorrows out in verse, as elegant and classical as may be. No sooner
-does one shepherd begin his song than another joins him and another,
-until there is a chorus of complaining lovers; the infection is so
-virulent that it leaps from man to man, and if a shepherd-boy breathe a
-poem to his lass, it is great odds that she will cap it with another,
-and then they will keep it up between them like a shuttlecock. The
-disease is so strong indeed that if poor Corydon has no one to cross
-Muses with, it forces Echo herself to answer him in rhyme:--
-
- 'In what state was I then, when I took this deadly disease?
- Ease.
- And what manner of mind which had to that humour a vain?
- Vain.
- Hath not reason enough vehemence to desire to reprove?
- Prove.
- Oft prove I but what salve when reason seeks to begone?
- One.
- Oh! what is it? what is it that may be a salve to my love?
- Love.
- What do lovers seek for long seeking for to enjoy?
- Joy.
- What be the joys for which to enjoy they went to the pains?
- Pains.
- Then to an earnest love what doth best victory end?
- End.'
-
-These lines are from Sir Philip Sidney's _Arcadia_, which, of course,
-was not in the Knight's library. We are told in advance that they are
-hexameters. How delightfully they scan:--
-
- - ˘ ˘ | - - | - - | - - | - ˘ ˘ | -
- 'What do lov | ers seek | for long | seeking | for to en | joy?
- -
- Joy.'
-
-On the next page a shepherdess 'threw down the burden of her mind
-in Anacreon's kind of verses.' And 'Basilius, when she had fully
-ended her song, fell prostrate upon the ground and thanked the gods
-they had preserved his life so long as to hear the very music they
-themselves had used in an earthly body.' Presently follows a copy of
-'Phaleuciaks,' and then Dorus 'had long he thought kept silence from
-saying something which might tend to the glory of her, in whom all
-glory to his seeming was included, but now he broke it, singing those
-verses called Asclepiadiks.' And they thought the night had passed
-quickly.
-
-[Illustration: SIR PHILIP SIDNEY]
-
-[An apology to Sidney.]
-
-This is no insult to Sir Philip Sidney, but only to the rather
-exorbitant demands of the form he had chosen. His own sonnets vindicate
-him as a poet, and some of them, even Hazlitt owned, who did not
-like him, 'are sweet even to a sense of faintness, luscious as the
-woodbine, and graceful and luxurious like it.' Sidney lets us see
-his own attitude in that splendid sentence which begins, 'Certainly
-I must confesse my own barbarousnes, I neuer heard the olde song
-of _Percy_ and _Duglas_ that I found not my heart mooued more then
-with a Trumpet; and yet is it sung but by some blinde Crouder, with
-no rougher voyce then rude stile'; I should be almost sorry that
-he finished it by saying 'which, being so euill apparrelled in the
-dust and cobwebbes of that vnciuill age, what would it worke trymmed
-in the gorgeous eloquence of _Pindar_?' but that it rings with the
-sincerity of his classicism. Taste has changed, and now we find his
-'barbarousnes' in the question rather than in the confession. But the
-sentence illustrating at once his sensitiveness to simplicity and his
-predilection for the classics, shows how genuine was the expression
-that the busy, chivalric diplomatist found for himself in the confines
-of Arcadia. The classic metres brought as near as might be our Tudor
-English to 'the language of the Gods.'
-
-[The slow progress of Arcadian narrative.]
-
-The continual downpour of poetry, the Arcadian substitute for rain,
-was not the only drag on the narrative of the pastoral story-tellers.
-Serenity was considered essential, and so, while the story was being
-everlastingly shunted, so that the lovesick shepherds might plain, it
-had also for every step it took forward to take another back in order
-to catch again the chosen atmosphere of lovesick repose. The result
-was 'a note of linked sweetness long drawn out,' a series of agitated
-standstills, and a narrative impossible to end. Cervantes' _Galatea_
-was never finished; the last books of _Arcadia_ were written by another
-hand; d'Urfé died before putting an end to _l'Astrée_; and Montemor
-abandoned his _Diana_.
-
-In the history of story-telling it is not the form of the pastoral that
-is important, but the motive that gave it its popularity. We begin to
-understand the motive when we notice that it became the fashion to
-hide real people under the names of Corydon and Phyllis, and to put
-ribboned crooks and silver horns into the hands of enemies and friends.
-At first it was the genuine feeling that made Boccaccio enshrine his
-Fiammetta; at the end it degenerated into mere privy gossip and books
-uninteresting without their keys; but in general it was simply a
-desire of flattering elaborate people into thinking themselves of
-simple heart. [The motive of the Pastoral.] The pastorals were like the
-paintings of Watteau and Lancret, where we find the ladies of a lively
-court playing innocent games under the trees, while, if we searched in
-the brushwood, we should find in the soft earth under the brambles the
-hoofmarks of the sporting satyrs. The feelings of author and subjects
-were those of the Vicar of Wakefield's family when they sat before the
-portrait painter:--'Olivia would be drawn as an Amazon, sitting upon a
-bank of flowers, dressed in a green Joseph richly laced with gold, and
-a whip in her hand. Sophia was to be a shepherdess, with as many sheep
-as the painter could put in for nothing.' Elizabethan ladies liked to
-think of themselves sitting on banks garlanding flowers, troubled only
-by the sweet difficulties of love, and with innumerable sheep, since
-the writer was able to put them in so very inexpensively.
-
-[Poussin's _Les Bergers d'Arcadie_.]
-
-There is another artist who, living before Cervantes and Sidney were
-dead, gives in his pictures, cleaner and sweeter than Watteau, an idea
-of the pastoral spirit. You can imagine one of Watteau's shepherdesses
-using paint. It would be impossible to suspect the same of one of
-Sidney's, or of one of Nicolas Poussin's, that solemn, sweet-minded man
-who was shocked as if by sacrilege at Scarron's irreverent treatment
-of Virgil. There is in the Louvre (how many times have I been to see
-it) a picture called 'Les Bergers d'Arcadie.' Hazlitt mentions it, most
-inaccurately as to facts, but most precisely as to feeling, in his
-essay on the painter:[6]--'But above all, who shall celebrate in terms
-of fit praise, his picture of the shepherds in the Vale of Tempe going
-out on a fine morning in the spring, and coming to a tomb with this
-inscription: _Et Ego in Arcadia vixi!_ The eager curiosity of some, the
-expression of others who start back with fear and surprise, the clear
-breeze playing with the branches of the shadowing trees, "the valleys
-low where the mild zephyrs use," the distant, uninterrupted, sunny
-prospects speak (and for ever will speak on) of ages past to ages yet
-to come!'
-
-In those sentences Hazlitt, who found the written pastoral dull, shows
-us the very secret of its life. In trying to copy the classic country
-writing, it came to be an attempt to reconstruct the time that has
-always been past since the beginning of the world. Real shepherds
-never do and never did show fear and surprise and eager curiosity on
-their weather-beaten faces; but then in Arcadia is no rain. Sweet,
-sunny days, soft, peaceful nights, green grass, white sheep, and
-smooth-cheeked shepherds Grecian limbed; the whole is the convention of
-a dream. It was the dream of busy men in close touch with a life whose
-end was apt to come short and sharp between the lifting of a flagon
-and putting the lips to it. And in Sidney's dream especially, there is
-something of the true Renaissance worship of the ancient gods. Sidney's
-dream was of a pastoral life; yes, but to him other things in it were
-more important than its rusticity. For him, at least, it must be a life
-where the goatfoot god still moved in the green undergrowth, where
-Diana hunted the white fawns, while Silenus tippled in the valley, and
-Apollo looked serenely from the wooded hill.
-
-[Conventional and realistic art.]
-
-This was the same art as that of Malory, though not that of the
-chansons or the sagas. It is the art in which life is simplified into
-a convention, and human figures worked into a tapestry. The pastoral
-romances are duller than those of chivalry, partly, no doubt, because
-their conventions are not home-made but taken as strictly as possible
-from another civilisation, and partly because they are too long for
-their motives--the pattern is repeated too often. But they do not
-represent a dead or a dying art, but rather a stage in the infancy
-of an art that has blossomed in our own day, in some of the work of
-Théophile Gautier, for example; in Mr. Nevinson's _Plea of Pan_,
-in some of the drawings of Aubrey Beardsley. Sidney's _Arcadia_ is
-terribly unwieldy, but passage after passage in it breathes a fragrance
-different from anything in the literature of realism.
-
-Indeed it is well to mark thus early the distinction between these
-two arts, the one that seeks to show us our own souls, the other
-that shows us life, that one that, using symbols disentangled from
-ordinary existence, can legitimately fill books with things beautiful
-in themselves, and the other that reconciles us to ugliness by showing
-us some vital interest, some hidden loveliness, some makeshift beauty
-in things as they generally are. The spirit of the one set statues
-of lovely forms in the bedchambers of the Grecian women, the spirit
-of the other praises ugly babies to their mothers. Both spirits have
-shown their right to be by the works of art whose inspiration they
-have been. We must only be careful not to criticise the art of the one
-by the canons that rule the art of the other. There are two worlds,
-the actual and the ideal. If Tom Jones were to open a door by saying
-'Open Sesame' to it, we should have a right to laugh, just as we
-should be legitimately disappointed if Ali Baba were to turn a key and
-enter the robber's treasury in the ordinary way. We cannot blame the
-Arcadian shepherds because they are not like the shepherds we meet
-about the hills, any more than we can blame that little kitchen slut
-called Cinderella for riding to a king's ball in a gold chariot made
-of a pumpkin. Truth to an ideal is all we may ask of dreams. And the
-pastorals, in spite of their borrowed conventions, do hold an ideal,
-suffocated though it sometimes is under an impossible technique, and
-the weight of ornament which is so tempting to those who have but newly
-learned the secrets of its manufacture.
-
-[Poetic prose.]
-
-Our later Arcadians have not so hampered themselves. They have made
-short stories instead of labyrinthine narratives, and they have
-been able, as Sidney tried to do, to disclaim any competition with
-utilitarian homespun literature by the use of a poetic prose. In the
-prose of Sidney's _Arcadia_, imitated from that of Lyly, but a little
-less noisily eccentric, falling perhaps too often between poetry and
-prose, we can see the promise of that new prose of ornament perfected
-by the artists of the nineteenth century, a prose firm, unshaken by the
-recurrent rhythms of verse, but richer in colour and melody than the
-prose of use.
-
-
-
-
-CERVANTES
-
-
-
-
-CERVANTES
-
-
-[Prologue.]
-
-IT is curious how many odds and ends may be heaped together and woven
-into a patchwork of thought, by a mind concentrating itself upon one
-idea, and, as if in spite of itself, making excursions after each
-chance butterfly and puff of wind, each half promise of real or phantom
-value it perceives. The mind returns continually to where it stood,
-bringing with it always something new, like a starling adding to its
-nest, until at last the original idea is so covered over with half
-visualised images, half clarified obscurities, dimly comprehended
-notions, that it is itself no longer to be seen but by a reverse
-process of picking away and throwing aside, one by one, the accretions
-that have been brought to it by the adventuring mind. For the last hour
-I have been sitting in my easy-chair, a cup of tea at my elbow, a pipe
-in my mouth, a good fire at my feet, trying not to let myself stray too
-far from the consideration of Cervantes and his place in the history
-of story-telling. All that hour, without effort, almost against my
-will, my mind has been playing about the subject, and bringing straw
-and scraps of coloured cloth, until now the plain notion of Cervantes
-is dotted over and burdened with a dozen other things--a comparison
-between an active life and a bookish one, the relation between parody
-and progress, the mingling of rogue novel and romance, Sir Walter
-Scott, and the remembrance of a band of Spanish village musicians.
-Perhaps if I disentangle this superstructure piece by piece Cervantes
-himself will become as visible as he intends to allow me to present him.
-
- * * * * *
-
-[An active life and a bookish one.]
-
-Cervantes was one of the men who write books in two languages; in
-literature and in life. Indeed, his contribution to his country's
-history is scarcely less vivid than his share in the history of
-story-telling. Cervantes the soldier, losing the use of his hand in
-the naval battle of Lepanto, in which he took so glorious a part
-that the grandiloquent Spanish tradition attributed to him, a mere
-private soldier, more than half the merit of the victory, is quite
-as attractive as Cervantes the impecunious author, writing plays for
-the theatre and poems for the nobility, collecting taxes for the
-king, pleasing himself with his _Galatea_, and laying literature
-under an international debt to him for his _Exemplary Novels_ and his
-_Don Quixote_. Like Sir Philip Sidney, he won admiration from his
-contemporaries as much for his personal worth as for his intellect.
-The maimed hand meant to them and him as much as any printed books.
-His own life was as romantic as his romance. Wherever he had found
-himself, boarding a Turkish galley, plotting for freedom in the prisons
-of Algiers, he had played the game as stirringly as d'Artagnan. Don
-Quixote's patriotism was no more obstinate and glamorous than his, and
-Sancho Panza's wisdom was gained in no school of harder knocks.
-
-It is not without significance that his first book should be a specimen
-of pastoral romance. The _Galatea_ bears no closer relation to workaday
-life than Sir Philip Sidney's _Arcadia_. This old soldier began his
-career as a man of letters by trying to settle upon an estate in
-Arcady, the very country whose cardboard foliage he was afterwards to
-ridicule, and the last book he wrote, in spite of the humaner work
-that had preceded it, was a romance not dissimilar from his first.
-Partly this must have been due to the fashion of the time; but it is
-not extravagant to find in it an illustration of the wistful manner in
-which men write about their opposites. Men like Stevenson, caged in
-sick rooms, may love to be buccaneers on paper. The real adventurers
-set the balance even by imagining themselves tending sheep on a smooth
-grassy slope.
-
-[_Don Quixote_ no parody.]
-
-Cervantes' _Galatea_ is not a great work. Its shepherds weep more
-than Sir Philip Sidney's, and sing considerably worse. But it had
-its success, and Cervantes was never anything but proud of it, a
-fact that should not be forgotten in remembering his _Don Quixote_.
-_Don Quixote_ has often been described as a parody of the heroic and
-pastoral romances, which indeed had become a little foolish. But
-Cervantes was not the man to jeer at what he loved. Instead, he fills
-the old skins that had held the wine of dreams with the new wine of
-experience. He did not parody the old romances, but re-wrote them in
-a different way. Parody laughs and writes a full stop; the art of
-Cervantes, Fielding, and Rabelais ends always in a hyphen, a sign that
-allows all manner of developments.
-
-[Illustration: MIGUEL DE CERVANTES SAAVEDRA]
-
-[The picaresque form.]
-
-Cervantes, like Shakespeare, used all the resources of his time, and
-did not disdain to profit by other men's experiments. _Don Quixote_
-owed a triple debt to the common-sensible humorous rogue novel invented
-seventy years before, as well as to the more serious tales of knights
-and pastoral life that made his existence possible. Thieves and
-shepherds and paragons of chivalry assisted at his birth. The thieves
-in particular were responsible for the design, or lack of design, in
-the construction of the book. The rogue novels were made by stringing
-a series of disconnected 'merry quips' along the autobiography or
-biography of a disreputable hero. They were like Punch and Judy shows.
-The character of Punch is as stable as his red nose or his hump back.
-His deeds do not change him, and, so long as he is always well in the
-front of his stage we ask for no other connecting thread in the
-entertainment than his habit of punctuating his conversation with a
-well-directed log of wood. Let him continue his villainous career, let
-his squeaking inhuman voice continue to exult, and we are perfectly
-contented. It was so with the rogues, and it is so with _Don Quixote_.
-As the Bachelor says, 'many of those that love mirth better than
-melancholy, cry out, give us more Quixoteries: let but Don Quixote lay
-on, and Sancho talk, be it what it will, we are satisfied.'
-
-[Rogue novel and romance.]
-
-Three hundred years after the Bachelor, we too are satisfied with
-Sancho's chatter, and his master's Quixoteries, because they are both
-pretty closely connected with humanity. If Don Quixote is among the
-clouds, Sancho Panza sits firm upon his donkey, and between the two of
-them the book itself moves spaciously upon a mellowed earth. There is
-a perpetual interplay between dignity and impudence, the ridiculous
-and the sublime, and the partners, as if at tennis, lend vigour and
-give opportunity to each other. Sancho is not a mere village bellyful
-of common sense, whose business is to make the Knight of the Doleful
-Countenance appear ridiculous. He, too, has his delusions; he, too,
-prefers sometimes those two birds twittering distantly in the bush;
-Romance, smilingly enough, has touched his puzzled forehead also. And
-Don Quixote, with ideals no less noble than those of Amadis of Gaul or
-Don Belianis of Greece, with notions of life no less exaggerated than
-those in the interminable pastorals, is yet a man of blood and bone.
-His ideals and notions are properly fleshed, and are in the book as a
-soul in a body. _Don Quixote_ is a book of dreams set upon earth, and
-earthly shrewdness reaching vainly after dreams. The rogue novels and
-the romances were, either of them, the one without the other.
-
-[The ideal not spoilt by the reality.]
-
-We see Don Quixote's adventures with the realist's eye of disillusion,
-and find that external perfection does not matter to our dreams. ''Tis
-not the deed but the intent.' The gorgeous charger of the knight of
-chivalry is become a poor old starveling hack that should have been
-horsemeat these dozen years. Mambrino's helmet is but a barber's bason
-after all. Lancelot's Guinevere is Dulcinea of the Mill. Her feet are
-large and her shoulders one higher than the other. The castle is a
-wayside inn, the routed army a flock of luckless sheep. The goatherds
-do not talk after the fashion of the Court, like those in _Galatea_;
-but, 'with some coarse compliment, after the country way, they desired
-Don Quixote to sit down upon a trough with the bottom upwards.' Gone
-are the rose-flecked cloudy pinnacles of dawn; we know them now for
-drenching rain. And yet--the play's the thing, and is not judged by its
-trappings, but by its beating heart. Not one scene in the Romances, not
-one glimpse of the Happy Valley in the Pastorals, has ever moved us
-like this book, which is so near life that when we close it we seem not
-to have flown on an enchanted carpet from a thousand leagues away, but
-to have stepped merely from one room to another of our own existence.
-
-[The _Exemplary Novels_.]
-
-The _Exemplary Novels_ were begun before _Don Quixote_, and published
-afterwards. They are examples rather of a form in story-telling than
-of any particular piety. Cervantes was, he tells us, 'the first to
-essay novels in the Castilian tongue, for the many novels which go
-about in print in Spanish are all translated from foreign languages,
-while these are my own, neither imitated nor stolen.' He took the form
-of the Italian short story, not the episode but the _nouvelle_, the
-little novel that had inspired the Elizabethans. He took this form and
-filled it with his own material, told in his own manner. In thinking of
-that manner I am reminded of the band of Spanish village musicians who
-seemed at first to have no obvious connection with my subject. There
-were perhaps a dozen of them grouped on the stage of a London music
-hall, and they played small windy tunes, occasionally blaring out with
-trumpets, using a musical scale entirely different from our own. I
-remembered a Japanese I had heard playing on a bamboo flute, and then
-the semitones of a little henna-stained flageolet from Kairouan. For
-theirs was Eastern music, and I wondered if these Spaniards still owed
-their scale to the old rulers of Granada. They set me thinking whether
-the peculiar movement of Cervantes' narrative had not also an Eastern
-origin. The facts favour the supposition. Up to the battle of Lepanto
-the Turks were so far a ruling nation as to be the supreme sea-power;
-until even later the most likely of incidents for the use of the
-story-teller was that which happened to Cervantes himself--capture by
-a Moslem pirate and imprisonment in Algiers. Only a hundred years had
-passed since the Moors had been driven from Granada. It would indeed be
-surprising if in Cervantes' work we found no sign of Eastern influence.
-'I tell it you,' quoth Sancho of his tale, 'as all stories are told
-in my country, and I cannot for the blood of me tell it in any other
-way, nor is it fit I should alter the custom.' Many characteristics of
-Cervantes' narrative remind us that he was writing in a country only
-recently freed from the Moors, and in a time when it took the united
-forces of Venice, Spain, and the Papacy to beat the Turks at sea.
-
-[Oriental story-telling.]
-
-Cervantes is not ignorant, for example, of the literary trick
-of letting his heroes quote from the poets, after the engaging,
-erudite manner of the heroes of the _Arabian Nights_. Sancho Panza's
-conversation is an anthology of those short wisdom-laden maxims that
-had been the staple of Hebrew and Arabic literature. 'Set a hen
-upon an egg'; 'While a man gets he never can lose'; 'Where there is
-no hook, to be sure there can hang no bacon'; shrewd Ali and careful
-Hakim exchange such sentences to-day in the market-places of the
-East. But these are small things and beside the main point. I want to
-suggest that Cervantes had caught, whether in his Algerine prison, or
-in his Morocco-Spanish Spain, the yarning, leisurely, humanity-laden,
-unflinching atmosphere of Oriental story-telling. The form of the
-_nouvelle_, Eastern in origin, had been passed on from Naples to Paris
-and to London, without noticeable improvement, but it seems to me that
-now in Spain it met the East again, and was accordingly recreated. It
-is just the element of Eastern narrative, accidental in the genius of
-Cervantes, that makes his examples of that form so infinitely more
-important than those of the English Elizabethans. Scott told Lockhart
-that the reading of the _Exemplary Novels_ first turned his mind to
-the writing of fiction, and in Scott there is precisely the mood of
-uninterruptible story-telling that Cervantes shares with the Princess
-Scherazada.
-
-The novels are delightful specimens of ambling, elaborate narrative,
-full of the easiest, most confident knowledge of humanity, illustrating
-with serene clarity a point of view that is to-day as refreshing as it
-is surprising. The happy endings, when the seducer falls in love at
-sight on meeting the seduced of years before, and satisfies all her
-scruples, and turns her sorrow to unblemished joy by marrying her, show
-an ethic of respectability no less assured than Richardson's. They are
-enriched by passages whose observation is as minute as Fielding's. They
-are never tales about nothing. There is always meat on their bones.
-They are among the few stories that can be read on a summer afternoon
-under an apple-tree, for they will bear contact with nature, and are
-never in a hurry. Even if Cervantes had not written _Don Quixote_, the
-_Exemplary Novels_ would have assured him a place in the history of his
-art. There is no cleverness in them, any more than in the greater book.
-The whole body of Cervantes' work is an illustration of the impregnable
-advantage that plain humanity possesses over intellect.
-
-[The portrait of Cervantes.]
-
-And now, after these various questions for the schoolmen, questions to
-more than one of which the cautious man must answer with Sir Roger,
-that 'much might be said on both sides,' let us return to the old
-story-teller himself, who will survive by innumerable generations our
-little praises and discussions as he has lived benevolent and secure
-through the centuries that have already passed over his grave. The
-only authentic portrait of Cervantes is in his own words. A hundred
-artists have tried to supplement these words with paint, and their
-pictures have at least a family likeness. The portrait made by Miss
-Gavin after a careful comparison parison of many others represents
-very fairly the traditional Cervantes type, and does not materially
-belie the lineaments that he describes:--'He whom you here behold, with
-aquiline visage, with chestnut hair, smooth and unruffled brow, with
-sparkling eyes, and a nose arched though well proportioned, a silver
-beard, although not twenty years ago it was golden, large moustache,
-small mouth, teeth not important, for he has but six of them, and
-those in ill condition and worse placed because they do not correspond
-the one with the other, the body between two extremes, neither large
-nor small, the complexion bright, rather white than brown, somewhat
-heavy-shouldered, and not very nimble on his feet; this, I say, is
-the portrait of the author of the _Galatea_ and of _Don Quixote de
-la Mancha_.' That is the sort of statement of himself that an honest
-humorous man might make to a friend. Part of the satisfaction given
-by his books is due to the comfortable knowledge that there is a
-man behind them, a man who knew the world and had not frozen in it.
-Cervantes, for all his intimacy with life, never became worldly enough
-to believe in hatred. He assumed that all his readers were his friends,
-and made them so by the assumption.
-
- * * * * *
-
-[Epilogue.]
-
-No: Cervantes is too simple a man to do anything but suffer in
-discussion. There are men whom you know well, who seem to elude you
-like the final mystery of metaphysics when you try to talk about them.
-My history and not Cervantes is the clearer for the rags and tatters
-of observation I have picked off him one by one. I had put them there
-myself. It was necessary, for the purposes of my book, to notice the
-Eastern character of his story-telling and his position between rogue
-novel and romance, but, now that it is done, I am glad to go back to
-him without pre-occupations. There is yet hot water in the kettle, and
-tea in the pot, and four hours to spend with _Don Quixote_ before I go
-to bed. Cervantes, at least, will bear me no malice, but tell me his
-story as simply as before I had tried to bring it into argument.
-
-
-
-
-THE ESSAYISTS' CONTRIBUTION TO STORY-TELLING
-
-
-
-
-THE ESSAYISTS' CONTRIBUTION TO STORY-TELLING
-
-
-[The Character.]
-
-THE detailed, silver-point portrait studies of Fanny Burney, the
-miniatures of Jane Austen, and the stronger etchings of Fielding
-and Smollett, owed their existence to something outside the art of
-story-telling, something other than the grave, humorous pictures of
-Chaucer, or the hiding of real people under the homespun of lovesick
-shepherds, or the gay autobiographies of swindling rogues. They owed it
-to an art which in its beginnings seemed far enough away from any sort
-of narrative. In those happy, thievish times when plagiary was a virtue
-to be cried upon the housetops, this art, or rather this artistic form,
-had been, like much else, stolen from antiquity.
-
-When literature was for the first time become a fashionable toy, and
-when, even at Court, a gallant or a soldier was far outmatched by a
-wit, the little book of _Theophrastus his Characters_ suggested a
-pastime that offered no less opportunity than poetry for the display
-of nimbleness and sparkling fancy. Life had become very diverse and
-elaborate, and how delightful to take one of its flowerings, one man,
-one woman, of a particular species, and exhibit it in a small space,
-in a select number of points and quips, each one barbed and sticking
-in the chosen target. Sir Thomas Overbury, trying to define the art he
-used so skilfully, said, in his clear way:--'To square out a character
-by our English levell, it is a picture (reall or personall) quaintly
-drawne, in various colours, all of them heightned by one shadowing.
-It is a quicke and soft touch of many strings, all shutting up in one
-musicall close: it is wit's descant on any plaine song.' The thing had
-to be witty; it had to be short. A busy courtier could compose one
-in a morning while his barber was arranging his coiffure, and show
-it round in the afternoon for the delectation of his friends and the
-increase of his vanity. He could take a subject like 'A Woman,' and
-with quick sentences pin her to the paper like a butterfly on cork.
-Then he could take another title, like 'A Very Woman,' and repeat his
-triumph with another variety of the species. [Sir Thomas Overbury.]
-Sir Thomas Overbury, that charming, insolent, honest man, the friend
-of Somerset, venomously done to death by his Countess for having given
-too good advice to her husband, is perhaps the most notable of the
-early practitioners. He is not to be despised for his sage poem on the
-choice of a wife, but he is at his best in the making of these little
-portraits, like that of the 'Faire and happy Milk-mayd,' wherein, in
-accordance with his definition, he could polish each detail without
-jarring his musical close, and without nullifying the single shadowing
-designed to heighten the whole. The form was fitted to the times like
-their fashions in clothes. The Character belonged to that age, like the
-novel to the nineteenth century. Sir Thomas, as his title-page tells
-us, was assisted by 'other much learned gentlemen'; he was presently
-followed by a man as different from himself as gentle John Earle,
-Doctor of Divinity, and just such a student as an Inns of Court man
-like Sir Thomas would naturally despise. So general was the inclination
-of the age to portraiture.
-
-[John Earle.]
-
-With Earle we are nearer the drawing of individuals, and so to a
-tenderer touch on idiosyncrasies. He relies less on quaint conceits
-(though he has plenty of them and charming ones at command; witness the
-child whose 'father hath writ him as his owne little story, wherein hee
-reads those dayes of his life that hee cannot remember') and trusts
-more often to fragments of real observation. His Characters are not so
-consistently wit's descant on a plain song. He is often content to give
-us a plain descant on a plain song--less concerned with his cleverness
-than with his subjects. With Earle we are already some way from the
-age of Elizabeth, and indeed Overbury, though he was able to quarrel
-with Ben Jonson, and in spite of his Renaissance death, seems to have
-a part in a less youthful century. In his wisdom, in his wise advice
-unwisely given to his friend, there is something already of the flavour
-of Addison; an essence ever so slight of the sound morality of the
-periodical essayists whose work owed more than a little to his own.
-
-[La Bruyère.]
-
-The same impulse that suggested the pleasure and profit of collecting
-Londoners as Theophrastus had collected his Athenians, suggested
-also the noting of contemporary manners. Manners and Characters,
-especially since Characters meant peculiarities, belonged to each
-other. Overbury's 'Pyrate' is a picture of the times quite as much as
-of that sterling fellow they produced, to whom if you gave 'sea roome
-in never so small a vessell, like a witch in a sieve, you would think
-he were going to make merry with the devill.' And the portrait of 'The
-Faire and happy Milk-mayd' betrays in its painting more than a little
-of the artist and of the age in which she sat for him. This is true of
-the plain Character, unexpanded and unframed; it is still more true of
-the Character in the form it very speedily took. The Character became
-a paragraph in a discursive essay, and La Bruyère, who copied directly
-from Theophrastus, does not make series of separate portraits, but
-notices in his original less his picturing of types than his suggestion
-of their circumstances, dividing his own work into large sections,
-'de la ville,' 'de la Cour,' 'des Biens de Fortune,' 'de la Société
-et de la Conversation,' where he seems to stroll slowly through a
-garden-walk of philosophy, pointing his remarks with his stick, and
-using such portraits as he cares to make to illustrate his general
-observations. His Characters are almost anecdotes. He is like the more
-advanced naturalist who, no longer content with his butterflies on
-cork and his stuffed birds stiff on perches, attempts to place them in
-the setting of their ordinary existence, where they may illustrate at
-once that existence and their own natures by some characteristic pose.
-How near is this to the desire of seeing them alive and in continuous
-action, which, if he had had it, would perhaps have made him combine
-his notes and sketches in a novel.
-
-[The periodical essayists.]
-
-The periodical essayists had La Bruyère, and Earle's _Microcosmography:
-A Piece of the World discovered in Essays and Characters_, and Sir
-Thomas Overbury with his much learned gentlemen, and Theophrastus, the
-father of them all, well in their memory. They too were collectors
-of Characters and observers of public morals and censurers of
-private follies. La Bruyère's aims with something more were theirs.
-Hazlitt's is so excellent a description of their work that I shall
-quote it instead of writing a stupid one. '_Quicquid agunt homines
-nostri farrago libelli_, is the general motto of this department of
-literature.... It makes familiar with the world of men and women,
-assigns their motives, exhibits their whims, characterises their
-pursuits in all their singular and endless variety, ridicules their
-absurdities, exposes their inconsistencies, "holds the mirror up to
-nature, and shows the very age and body of the time its form and
-pressure"; takes minutes of our dress, air, looks, words, thoughts,
-and actions; shows us what we are, and what we are not; plays the
-whole game of human life over before us, and by making us enlightened
-spectators of its many coloured scenes, enables us (if possible)
-to become tolerably reasonable agents in the one in which we have
-to perform a part.' We might be listening to a description of the
-eighteenth century novel of manners. Fanny Burney would have recognised
-these pretensions for her secret own, though she might have blushed to
-see them so emblazoned.
-
-[Minuteness of observation.]
-
-_The Tatler_, _The Spectator_, _The Guardian_, and the rest of them,
-are like a long series of skirmishes in a determined campaign on the
-part of the essayists to cross the borderland of narrative. Their
-traditions, the Character, Montaigne, and Bacon, were very different
-from those of the story-tellers. The canvases prescribed for them were
-not huge things almost shutting out the sky, but a very small stock
-size, two or three pages only, to lie two days on coffee-house tables,
-and be used for wrapping butter on the third. The essayists were like
-men compelled to examine an elephant with a pocket microscope. Each
-subject, small as it was, hid all others for the moment, so that their
-observation made mountain peaks and ranges out of pimples and creases.
-These very limitations sharpened the weapons of their struggle, the
-weapons that were at last to be taken over by the novelists. The small
-canvas made carelessness impossible, and this compulsory attention to
-detail gave a new dignity to the trivialities that the novelists had so
-far overlooked.
-
-[Mr. Bickerstaff.]
-
-The very conception of these papers contained an accidental discovery
-of a possibility in fiction. _The Tatler_ was not written by Steele,
-or Swift, or Addison, or indeed by any one of its contributors, but
-by a Mr. Isaac Bickerstaff, an oldish gentleman, a bachelor, a lover
-of children and discreet good fellowship, of an austere but kindly
-life, possessed by a pleasant, old-gentlemanly desire to better the
-manners of the town. This is personal, yes, but ... and the _but_ has
-the dignity of the sentence ... the personality is imaginary. It is a
-Character so far alive as to be able to conduct a magazine. It was a
-utilitarian conception. Steele was, or pretended to be, vastly annoyed
-when the authorship was found out and his own jolly person discovered
-under the sober clothes of Mr. Bickerstaff. 'The work,' he says, 'has
-indeed for some time been disagreeable to me, and the purpose of it
-wholly lost by my being so long understood as its author.... The
-general purpose of the whole has been to recommend truth, innocence,
-honour, and virtue as the chief ornaments of life; but I considered
-that severity of manners was absolutely necessary to him who would
-censure others, and for that reason, and that only, chose to talk
-in a mask. I shall not carry my humility so far as to call myself a
-vicious man, but at the same time must confess, my life is at best but
-pardonable. And, with no greater character than this, a man would make
-but an indifferent progress in attacking prevailing and fashionable
-vices, which Mr. Bickerstaff has done with a freedom of spirit, that
-would have lost both its beauty and efficacy, had it been pretended
-to by Mr. Steele.' It is as if we were to hear Defoe apologising for
-dressing up as Robinson Crusoe, assuring us that his book is but an
-allegory, and telling us with due solemnity that he has lived with his
-wife these many years, and hardly above once set foot on shipboard, and
-then only between London Bridge and Greenwich. Steele was quite unaware
-that _The Tatler_ was an embryo novel. And yet, what is it, but an
-imaginary character, sometimes meeting other imaginary characters, and
-experiencing subjects instead of undergoing adventures?
-
-[Illustration: RICHARD STEELE AND JOSEPH ADDISON]
-
-[The Character and the short story.]
-
-Mr. Bickerstaff was in himself a contribution to character-study in
-fiction; the daily talks that were put into his mouth by Steele and
-his friends, supplied others no less valuable. The Character, the neat
-driven team of short sentences, became in his hands something like
-a story. It became an anecdote with no other point than to bring alive
-the person described. And the portraits became less general. Types
-turned into individuals. Ned Softly, for example, is not called 'a very
-Poet,' and hit off with, 'He will ever into Company with a Copy of
-Verses in his Pocket; and these will be read to all that suffer him.
-Every Opinion he taketh for Praise, and Ridicule in his Ears soundeth
-like Flattery.' He is given the name by which he is known in private
-life. We see him walk into the room, hear his preliminaries, watch
-his battery unmasked as he opens his pocket, listen to his verses,
-hear them again, line by ridiculous line, observe him batten on the
-opinions he extracts, and see him hide his darlings at the approach
-of sterner-featured critics. The Character is become a little scene.
-The moth has no pin through his middle, but flaps his way where we may
-see him best. Here is the very art that Fanny Burney, that charming
-show-woman, was to use for the exhibition of Madame Duval; here the
-alchemy that was to turn puppets into people. It is the same that gave
-Pygmalion his mistress. The essayists owed much to their own hearts, or
-to the heart they set in 'our' Mr. Bickerstaff, for if you love a man
-as well as you laugh at him, it is great odds that he will come alive.
-
-[Mr. Bickerstaff's letter-box.]
-
-Steele probably got a few letters from unknown correspondents, dull
-and stupid as such things are. Perhaps in laughingly parodying them
-at the coffee-house tables he caught the idea of inventing better
-ones for Mr. Bickerstaff's assistance. Perhaps, when hard pressed for
-time, thrown to the last minute for his work by some merry expedition
-with the Kit Kats to talk and drink wine under the mulberry-tree
-on Hampstead Heath, he found he could get quicker into a subject
-through the letter of a servant girl than through Mr. Bickerstaff's
-first-personal lucubrations. However that may be, much of the best
-reading in both _Tatler_ and _Spectator_ is held in the letters
-supposed to be written to the man who was supposed to write the whole.
-These letters are not mere statements of fact, to serve instead of
-Latin quotations as texts for essays. They are imitations, 'liker than
-life itself,' of the letters of reality. Each one of them is written
-by some individual person whose impress on its writing is so clear
-that the letter makes a portrait of himself. Even the cock in Clare
-Market has a personality quite his own when he sends Mr. Bickerstaff
-a petition. And as for the Quaker; remember how he would have been
-described in the old manner, and read this:--
-
- 'TO THE MAN CALLED THE SPECTATOR
-
- 'FRIEND,--Forasmuch as at the Birth of thy Labour, thou didst
- promise upon thy Word, that letting alone the Vanities that do
- abound, thou wouldest only endeavour to strengthen the crooked
- Morals of this our _Babylon_, I gave Credit to thy fair Speeches,
- and admitted one of thy Papers every Day, save _Sunday_, into my
- House; for the Edification of my Daughter _Tabitha_, and to the End
- that _Susanna_, the Wife of my Bosom, might profit thereby. But
- alas! my Friend, I find that thou art a Liar, and that the Truth is
- not in thee; else why didst thou in a Paper which thou didst lately
- put forth, make Mention of those vain Coverings for the Heads of
- our Females, which thou lovest to liken unto Tulips, and which are
- lately sprung up among us? Nay, why didst thou make Mention of them
- in such a Seeming, as if thou didst approve the Invention, insomuch
- that my Daughter _Tabitha_ beginneth to wax wanton, and to lust
- after these foolish Vanities? Surely thou dost see with the Eyes
- of the Flesh. Verily, therefore, unless thou dost speedily amend
- and leave off following thine own Imagination, I will leave off
- thee.--_Thy Friend as hereafter thou dost demean Thyself_,
-
- 'HEZEKIAH BROADBRIM.'
-
-Could anything of the kind be better? It needed only a series of such
-letters, consistent to a few characters, and dealing with a succession
-of events, to produce a 'Humphry Clinker.' The letters of Matthew
-Bramble and his sister, and Lyddy, 'who had a languishing eye and read
-romances,' are built no more cunningly than this of Hezekiah.
-
-[Sir Roger de Coverley--a novel.]
-
-If I were asked which was the first English novel of character-study,
-as I am asking myself now, I should reply, as I reply now, those essays
-in the _Spectator_ that are concerned with Sir Roger de Coverley.
-Set that little series of pictures in a book by themselves, as has
-been done with appropriate and delightful illustrations by Mr. Hugh
-Thomson, and in reading them you will find it hard to remember that you
-are not enjoying a more than usually leisurely kind of narrative. The
-knight is shown to us in different scenes; we watch him at the assizes,
-leaning over to the judge to congratulate him on the good weather
-his lordship enjoys; we see him smile in greeting of Will Wimble; we
-watch him fidget in his seat with impatience of the misdeeds of the
-villain in the play; we hear of his death with a tear in our eye that
-is a testimony to the completeness and humanity of the portraiture.
-If only his love-story were thinly spread throughout the book and not
-begun and ended in a chapter, _Sir Roger de Coverley_ would be a novel
-indeed. As it is, in that delicate picture of a country gentleman and
-country life--for Sir Roger does not stand against a black curtain for
-his portraiture, but before his tenants and his friends--we have the
-promise of _The Vicar of Wakefield_ and of _Cranford_, and of all that
-chaste and tender kind of story-telling that is almost peculiar to our
-literature.
-
-[Johnson and Goldsmith.]
-
-Johnson and Goldsmith followed the tradition. Even the ponderous Doctor
-could step lightly at times, and never so lightly as when he obeyed the
-instinct that turns discussion into fiction and essays into sketches.
-He too can write his letters, and that from Mrs. Deborah Ginger,
-the unfortunate wife of a city wit, is a story in itself. And as for
-Goldsmith, he can hardly hold his pen for half a paragraph before it
-breaks away from the hard road of ideas and goes merrily along the
-bridle-path of mere humanity. His letters from Lien Chi Altangi, that
-serious Chinese busied in exposing the follies of the Occident, turn
-continually to story-telling. A wise remark will usher in an Eastern
-tale, and, not even in the papers of Steele or Addison are the subjects
-of characters, like the little beau, who would have been a 'mere
-indigent gallant,' magicked so deliciously to life. Finally, he did
-with 'The Man in Black' what Addison and Steele could so well have done
-with Sir Roger. Fielding and Smollett had written before him, and he
-saw that he could follow their art without resigning any of the graces
-of the essayist.
-
-[The later essayists.]
-
-The eighteenth century saw the absorption of the periodical essayists
-into avowed story-telling. Miss Burney left them nothing to do
-but to write sketches for chapters that might have appeared in
-her books. The essayists who came later could only make beautiful
-examples of a form that was already a little old-fashioned, though,
-following other suggestions, they experimented in a new direction and
-found another art to teach to story-tellers. Leigh Hunt's pair of
-early nineteenth-century portraits, 'The Old Gentleman,' and 'The
-Old Lady,' betray the family likeness of the character as it was
-known to Overbury. Lamb's portrait of Mrs. Battle is nearer modern
-story-telling. He does not let us into more than one of Sarah Battle's
-secrets, but in telling us of her attitude towards the game of whist
-he shows us how she looked upon the game of life. We would know her
-if we met her, even if she were not seated at the card-table, the
-candles unsnuffed, the fire merry on the hearth, and in the faces of
-her and her partner and foes the frosty joy of 'the rigour of the
-game.' Hazlitt, though he stuck close to his Montaigne, and cared less
-to illustrate himself by other people than by his own opinions, gives
-us characters too--that noble one of his father!--and his account of
-Jack Cavanagh the fives player, and his description of his going down
-to see the fight, are splendid passages of biography and narrative.
-But the gift of the later essayists to story-telling was the new
-art of reverie, and of the description of an event so soaked in the
-describer's personality as to be at once an essay and a story. [The art
-of reverie.] Few forms are richer in opportunity either for essayist or
-story-teller, than that which made possible Lamb's 'Dream Children,'
-and in which the child De Quincey, who had been in Hell, could show
-us the calamity of three generations of beautiful children, and ask
-at last whether death or life were the more terrible, the more to be
-feared. It is sufficient to mention the names of Walter Pater and
-Mr. Cunninghame Graham to show that some of the finest work of modern
-times has been done in this kind of story-telling, and is being so done
-to-day. And this art, this most delicate art of suggested narrative, is
-it not also--to return, perhaps a little fancifully, to the tragic old
-knight's definition--is it not also 'a picture in various colours, all
-of them heightned by one shadowing'? Is it not also 'a quicke and soft
-touch of many strings, all shutting up in one musicall close'?
-
-
-
-
-TRANSITION: BUNYAN AND DEFOE
-
-
-
-
-TRANSITION: BUNYAN AND DEFOE
-
-
-[The old world of fairy tale.]
-
-THE hundred years between the Elizabethan romancers and the English
-novelists was not a period of great story-telling like the fifty that
-were to follow it, or the first half of the nineteenth century. It
-is of interest here mainly because it witnessed a complete change of
-audience, the gradual transition of all the arts from a light-hearted
-and credulous old world to a careful and common-sense new one. The
-change is made very clear by a comparison of the stories popular before
-and after.
-
-Robert Burton gives us a fairly accurate notion of the story-telling
-of the first quarter of the century, in a paragraph of _The Anatomy
-of Melancholy_. He is referring to spoken tales, but his description
-applies quite as well to tales in print. 'The ordinary recreations
-which we have in winter, and in the most solitarie times busie our
-minds with, are cards, tables and dice ... merry tales of errant
-knights, queens, lovers, lords, ladies, giants, dwarfs, theeves,
-cheaters, witches, fayries, goblins, friers, etc., such as the old
-woman told Psyche in Apuleius, Bocace novels, and the rest, _quarum
-auditione pueri delectantur, senes narratione_, which some delight to
-hear, some to tell, all are well pleased with.' In short, the material
-of Shakespeare's plays, of Spenser's _Faërie Queene_, of the early
-rogue books, and of the tales imitated from Italy and antiquity by
-Greene and Lodge and Pettie.
-
-[A more sober spirit.]
-
-By 1640 things had already changed a little. James Mabbe, the quaint
-flavour of whose Tudor style, endearing as the moss on an old house,
-reminds us that he published his translation of six of the _Exemplary
-Novels_ before Cervantes had been dead for a quarter of a century,
-felt that he had to apologise for them to the more sober spirit of the
-time. 'Your wisest and learnedst Men,' he writes, 'both in Church and
-Common-weale, will sometimes leave off their more serious discourses,
-and entertain themselves with matters of harmelesse Merriment and
-Disports. Such are these stories I present unto your view. I will
-not promise any great profit you shall reape by reading them, but I
-promise they will be pleasing and delightful, the Sceane is so often
-varied, the Passages are so pretty, the Accidents so strange, and in
-the end wrought to so happy a Conclusion.' That marks very neatly the
-mid-seventeenth-century attitude towards the art. It was not impossible
-that the simple unascetic humanity of Cervantes would be taken amiss
-by these people who were stirred by the forces that were producing a
-Cromwell and a Bunyan, a Commonwealth and a _Pilgrim's Progress_.
-Only, in contradiction to this, the translator could make a confident
-appeal to a Pepysian delight in pretty passages, strange accidents,
-and happy conclusions--a delight only different from that of the
-Elizabethans in its anxiety to be able to write 'harmelesse' when it
-had enjoyed them.
-
-[Illustration: JOHN BUNYAN]
-
-[Bunyan's world.]
-
-Before the _Pilgrim's Progress_ was written there had come to be
-two parties in the audience: one with an epicurean delight in loose
-living, and one whose care was for a stern decency that postponed all
-flamboyance to a future life. The men of the first party flung their
-roses the more joyously for their antagonism to the sober black of
-the others, and were all the merrier for the thought that most of the
-community held them damned, although, when Bunyan wrote, theirs was
-the outward victory. Consciences were violently stirred, and so were
-either hardened absolutely, or else unmistakably alive. If you were
-good you were very very good, and if you were bad you were horrid,
-like the little girl in the rhyme. There had been revolutions and
-counter-revolutions; and likes and dislikes were pretty strongly
-marked, because men had had to fight for them.
-
-Bunyan's business was the description of a pilgrim's progress through
-a world thus vividly good and bad. His choice of allegory as a method
-allowed him to illustrate at the same time the earnestness of his times
-and their extraordinary clarity of sensation. It was a form ready to
-his hand. The authorised version of the Bible, published in 1611, its
-English retaining the savour of a style then out of date, formed at
-once his writing and his method, as it constituted his education. 'My
-Bible and Concordance are my only library in my writings.' And, himself
-a minor prophet, he could quote from Hosea: 'I have used similitudes.'
-
-[The justification of allegory.]
-
-Bunyan's use of them was very different from Spenser's. Hazlitt said
-of _The Faërie Queene_ that, if you left the allegory alone, it would
-leave you; and his advice may be safely followed. It is not so with
-Bunyan, and his allegory must be defended in another manner. It needs
-defence, for although it is one of the oldest and pleasantest ways
-of producing wisdom-laden stories, it is so easy to use badly that
-people have become a little out of patience with it. We remember the
-far-fetched explanations tagged on to the _Gesta Romanorum_, and refuse
-any longer to be fobbed off with puzzles that are easy to make and hard
-to solve. We demand that a book shall have cost its author at least as
-much as it costs us. Allegory is like fantasy, either worthless, or not
-to be bought with rubies and precious stones; with anything, in fact,
-but blood. When Bunyan writes:
-
- 'It came from my own heart, so to my head,
- And thence into my fingers trickled;
- Then to my pen, from whence immediately
- On paper I did dribble it daintily,'
-
-he sets up the one plea that is an absolute justification of his
-method; that it is 'dribbled daintily,' and came from the depths of
-him. The old monks wrote their stories, and searched their heads for a
-meaning. But Bunyan thought for himself, and could not think without
-seeing. His heart's talk was in passionate imagery.
-
-[Bunyan and the early painters.]
-
-He was the son of a tinker, and a tinker himself, and saw his visions
-as clearly as he saw his tin pans. His book is never opalescent with
-the shifting colours of a vague mysticism. It is painted in tints as
-sharp and bright and simple as Anglo-Saxon words. Bunyan had to throw
-himself into no trance in order to watch the pilgrim's arrival at the
-New Jerusalem. The Celestial City was as real to him as London, and
-there seemed to him no need to describe it in a whisper. His eyes
-were as childlike as those of the early painters, who clothed the
-builders of the Tower of Babel in fifteenth-century Italian costume,
-put a little bonnet on the head and a flying cloak about the shoulders
-of Tobias, and set soft leather boots on the feet of the angel. The
-whole of the _Pilgrim's Progress_ is contemporary with Mr. Pepys. 'Now
-Christiana, if need was, could play upon the viol, and her daughter
-Mercy upon the lute; so, since they were so merry disposed, she played
-them a lesson, and Ready-to-halt would dance. So he took Despondency's
-daughter, named Much-afraid, by the hand, and to dancing they went
-in the road. True, he could not dance without one crutch in his
-hand; but, I promise you, he footed it well. Also the girl was to be
-commended, for she answered the music handsomely.' It might be Mr.
-Pepys himself describing the frolic of some friends. And yet it was
-the most natural, righteous thing in the world, since Great Heart had
-killed Giant Despair, and Despondency and Much-afraid had just been
-freed from the dungeons of Doubting Castle.
-
-[The Fear of Life.]
-
-It is characteristic of the English spirit that the greatest national
-classic of piety should be written by a man whose relish for life was
-in no way blunted by his thoughts of immortality. Bunyan had a fear of
-life no less real than his fear of God, and loved both God and life the
-better for fearing them. Men set capital letters to the Fear of God,
-and there is a Fear of Life no less different from cowardice. Bunyan,
-a brave man, imprisoned again and again for his beliefs, and more than
-once in imminent danger of hanging, shows in a passage of his _Grace
-Abounding_ this Fear of Life in a very glare of light. Bunyan had loved
-bell-ringing, and, after he had come to consider it not the occupation
-of a man whose profession was so perilous and serious as a Christian's,
-he could not help going to the belfry to watch those whose scruples
-still allowed them his favourite pastime.
-
- 'But quickly after, I began to think, "How if one of the bells
- should fall?" Then I chose to stand under a main beam, that lay
- athwart the steeple from side to side, thinking here I might stand
- sure; but then I thought again, should the bell fall with a swing,
- it might first hit the wall, and then rebounding upon me, might
- kill me for all this beam. This made me stand in the steeple door;
- and now thought I, I am safe enough, for if a bell should then
- fall, I can slip out behind these thick walls, and so be preserved
- notwithstanding. So after this I would yet go to see them ring,
- but would not go any further than the steeple door; but then it
- came into my head, 'How if the steeple itself should fall?' And
- the thought (it may, for aught I know, when I stood and looked
- on) did continually so shake my mind, that I durst not stand at
- the steeple-door any longer, but was forced to flee, for fear the
- steeple should fall upon my head.'
-
-A man who felt as vividly as that, and was as stout as Bunyan, taking
-existence as he would take a nettle, took it with a grip as firm as
-that of love, and loved and feared his life as he loved and feared
-his God. He knew that brightness and clarity of sensation desired by
-Stendhal when he wrote, 'The perfection of civilisation would be to
-combine all the delicate pleasures of the nineteenth century with the
-more frequent presence of danger.' Life was very actual to him, and
-so, in this account of a pious dream, we find the clearest prophecy of
-that sense for reality that distinguishes the novels of the eighteenth
-century. The _Pilgrim's Progress_ was the first great story of that
-series of books that was to paint the English character in the eyes of
-the world.
-
-[Facts.]
-
-A fact is something very like an Englishman. It is a thing complete in
-itself, and satisfactory on that account. There is no vanity about a
-fact, and, as a people, we hate showing off. I can think of no other
-nation as hungry for fact as ours, none with a book that corresponds
-to the _Newgate Calendar_ and has been so popular, none with a book of
-spiritual adventure so actual as the _Pilgrims Progress_, none with a
-book of bodily adventure comparable with _Robinson Crusoe_. Defoe and
-Bunyan stand for the plain facts of religion and existence, in both of
-which they found so English a delight.
-
-[The instinct for verisimilitude.]
-
-Bunyan's book is an account of a dream. It is not a frank fairy tale
-demanding a certain licence of nature to make possible its supernatural
-events. Like the _Romance of the Rose_, unlike the _Faërie Queene_, it
-takes its licence in its first sentence--'As I slept, I dreamed'--and
-is able thenceforth to be as miraculous as it pleases without much loss
-of credibility, since miracle, if not consistency and continuity, is of
-the very element of a dream. It was an instinct for reality that made
-Bunyan give his story such a setting. Giants and dwarfs could no longer
-be jostled with thieves and cheaters as when Burton wrote. And Defoe,
-writing another forty years later, shows this same instinct for reality
-very much more conscientiously developed.
-
-[Illustration: DANIEL DEFOE]
-
-With an imagination scarcely less opulent than Bunyan's, Defoe,
-if he had described a dream, would have managed somehow to make it
-as short-winded and inconsequent as a real one. He was in love with
-verisimilitude, and delighted in facts for their own sakes. 'To read
-Defoe,' wrote Charles Lamb, 'is like hearing evidence in a Court of
-Justice.' No compliment could have pleased him better.
-
-[Lamb and Defoe.]
-
-The letter in which Lamb paid it him was written at the East India
-House, immediately after the labour of entering the accounts of a tea
-sale. Careless as it is, it contains a criticism of Defoe's books that
-goes to the root of his method. Here is its kernel. 'The author,'
-writes Lamb, 'never appears in these self-narratives (for so they ought
-to be called, or rather, autobiographies), but the _narrator_ chains us
-down to an implicit belief in everything he says.' (It is interesting
-to notice that Defoe, a very early realist, obeyed the spirit of
-Flaubert's maxim, that a writer should be everywhere invisible in his
-work, and that his books should, so to speak, tell themselves.) 'There
-is all the minute detail of a log-book in it. Dates are painfully
-impressed upon the memory. Facts are repeated over and over in varying
-phases, till you cannot choose but believe them.' Then follows the
-sentence already quoted. Lamb goes on: 'So anxious the story-teller
-seems that the truth should be clearly comprehended, that when he has
-told us a matter of fact or a motive in a line or two farther down he
-repeats it, with his favourite figure of speech, 'I say,' so and so,
-though he had made it abundantly plain before. This is an imitation of
-the common people's way of speaking, or rather of the way in which they
-are addressed by a master or mistress, who wishes to impress something
-on their memories, and has a wonderful effect upon matter-of-fact
-readers.'
-
-[The new world of matter-of-fact.]
-
-There is little to add to that, though Lamb 'had not looked into
-them latterly,' or he would have noticed in Defoe's books, with his
-quick eye for such things, Defoe's wary way with anything that seems
-to him at all incredible. In _The Journal of the Plague Year_, for
-example, none of the more dramatic anecdotes are vouched for by the
-writer. He heard them from some one else, did not see them with his
-own eyes, finds them hard to believe, and so rivets the belief of his
-readers. We shall observe in discussing Hawthorne the more advanced
-possibilities of this ingenious trick. The best books of Defoe's
-are rogue novels, and in none of them was he content with a merely
-literary reality. His heroes are as solid as ordinary men, or more so.
-The figure of Selkirk shrinks away like a faint shadow behind that of
-Crusoe, whose imaginary adventures his own had suggested, and there
-can be no doubt in anybody's mind as to which of the two is the more
-credible. And then there is that style of his, homelier even than
-Bunyan's, though less markedly so, since he is describing homelier
-things. There is no Euphuism here; Defoe was not the man to deal in
-gossamers. The essayist's delicacy of line had not yet been given to
-the story-tellers, and Defoe was not the man to deal with silver point.
-His style is as simple and effective as a bricklayer's hod. He carries
-facts in it, and builds with them alone. The resulting books are like
-solid Queen Anne houses. There is no affectation about them; they are
-not decorated with carving; but they are very good for 'matter-of-fact
-readers' to live in. Matter-of-fact readers made Defoe's audience, and
-the hundred years since Burton wrote had made a matter-of-fact English
-nation out of the credulous Elizabethans. The eighteenth century opens
-with this note. The tales the old woman told Psyche have been blown
-away like dead leaves into heaps for the children to play in, and
-grown-up people, serious now, have done with fairy tale and are ready
-for the English novel.
-
-
-
-
-RICHARDSON AND THE FEMININE NOVEL
-
-
-
-
-RICHARDSON AND THE FEMININE NOVEL
-
-
-[For women by women.]
-
-EUPHUES had addressed a dedication to the 'Ladies and Gentlewomen
-of England,' and had said openly that he would rather lie shut in
-a tiring closet than open in a study; but, writing for women as he
-did, he never tried to write as if he were himself a woman. On the
-contrary, Lyly's attitude was that of the gallant. The Elizabethan
-romancers who followed him were read by women but content to be men.
-Mrs. Behn, whose 'weltering sewerage' we have not had space to discuss,
-wrote for women, but certainly not less coarsely than if she had been
-writing for her own heroes. It was not until the eighteenth century
-that there was fairly launched a new story-telling, characteristically
-English in origin, without the fine careless heroism and improbability
-of romance, that it held was 'calculated for amusement only,' and
-different also from the mischievous realism of the picaresque. These
-ships, with their gallant scarlet and gold pennons, and their merry
-skull and cross-bones, had been long afloat before there came to join
-them a white barge with a lily at the prow and on her decks girls in
-white dresses, with their heads close together telling stories to each
-other. The author of a tale had hitherto been either a man, a god, or
-a rascal; he had never been content to be a girl. And the first of the
-new craftswomen was a fat and solid little printer and alderman of the
-City of London, called Samuel Richardson.
-
-[Samuel Richardson.]
-
-Richardson was an author of a kind quite new to English
-letters--neither a great gentleman like Sidney, nor a roisterer like
-Greene, nor a fanatic preacher like Bunyan, nor a journalist like
-Defoe; just a quiet, conscientious, little business man, who, after a
-duteous apprenticeship, had married his master's daughter like a proper
-Whittington, and, when she died, had married again, with admirable
-judgment in each case. It is not every one who can marry two wives and
-be unhappy with neither. As a boy, he had written love-letters for
-young women who were shy of their abilities. Girlish in his youth, he
-had preferred the tea-table to the tavern. Surrounded by women in his
-manhood, he was a grotesque little figure of a man, as inquisitive as
-an old maid, as serious over detail as a village gossip; walking in the
-Park, and looking at the feet of the women he met, and, as they passed
-him, quickly scanning their faces, and saying to himself, 'that kind
-of person,' or 'this kind of person,' and then going on to observe and
-summarise the next. He was accustomed, like a Japanese draughtsman, or
-a woman in a theatre, to complete and instantaneous observation.
-His was just the mind to show women what they could do; and this, with
-their constant applause and help, he did.
-
-[Illustration: SAMUEL RICHARDSON]
-
-He had a lifetime of feminine society behind him when he was asked
-to write a series of letters on 'the useful concerns in common life'
-for the guidance of servant-girls, and, setting himself to the task,
-produced _Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded_, and then, stepping on from his
-success, _Clarissa Harlowe_, and finally the monstrous _Grandison_.
-The books were written in a close atmosphere of femininity. 'My
-worthy-hearted wife and the young lady who is with us, when I had read
-them some part of the story, which I had begun without their knowing
-it, used to come into my little closet every night, with--"Have you any
-more of Pamela, Mr. R.? We are come to hear a little more of Pamela."'
-Every letter of Clarissa's was canvassed by the tea-parties that wept
-and trembled for her fate, and worshipped her proud little creator.
-And all his friends contributed their ideas of the perfect man to the
-making of Sir Charles Grandison. No author had ever written so before.
-
-[The novel by post.]
-
-I believe that the femininity of the resulting books was due to his
-choice of the epistolary method as well as to his own temperament, and
-his enviable opportunities of studying the character of the audience
-at which he aimed. If he had not happened upon it, if he had tried
-to tell his stories in the manner fashionable at the time, they would
-but have been exaggerations and amplifications of tales that Steele
-would have put most comfortably into a single number of _The Tatler_
-or _Spectator_. If he had used the autobiographical form he would have
-been prohibited from much of his detail, and all the effect of lighting
-his subject from several points of view. But letters were so new in
-story-telling that they helped him to be new himself, just as a new
-and unusual fashion of coat helps a man to be militantly original,
-within as well as without. And then letters, always describing events
-that have scarcely happened, excuse the most unlimited detail, the
-most elaborately particularised gossip or confession. Letters were the
-perfect medium for the expression of the feminine mind.
-
-I do not deny that there are disadvantages in the novel by post,
-that concerns many characters in elaborate play. Richardson has, for
-example, to keep his corresponding couples, naughty Lovelace and
-uneasy Belford, Clarissa and the giddy Miss Howe, dodging apart again
-and again for the purpose of exchanging letters. We are tortured by
-Pamela's efforts for the good of her story, her letters sandwiched
-between tiles and buried in earth, the incredible agility of her
-postman John, and the forethought and luck that enables her to provide
-herself with ink and paper in the most impossible circumstances. And
-when Mr. Belford writes of Clarissa, 'there never was a woman so young
-who wrote so much and with such celerity,' we look at the huge volumes
-and find it easy to believe him. When we hear that 'Her thoughts
-keeping pace with her pen she hardly ever stopped or hesitated, and
-very seldom blotted out or altered,' we reflect that she certainly
-had not the time. And when later we are told that 'Last night, for
-the first time since Monday last, she got to her pen and ink; but
-she pursues her writing with such eagerness and hurry as show her
-discomposure,' we cannot help smiling to think how very advantageous
-such discomposure must be to Mr. Richardson, who is to edit the
-correspondence. There is this difficulty of credibility, and also
-occasional even more obvious awkwardnesses, as when the characters,
-always very obliging to their creator, have to enclose copies of
-letters that would not otherwise have got into print.
-
-[Richardson does not attempt illusion.]
-
-On the other hand, we cannot count these as serious blemishes on a
-form of art so far removed from any attempt at illusion. There is in
-Richardson's novels no sort of visualised presentment of life. We see
-his principal characters through little panes of glass over their
-hearts, and in no other way. I cannot for the life of me imagine what
-Clarissa really looked like, but I know well enough what she thought.
-Spasmodic reminders of Pamela's abstract prettiness produce little
-but an impatient desire to see a portrait. I remember but one glimpse
-of her, and that is in the first volume, when she has dressed herself
-up in her new homespun clothes, dangles a straw hat by its two blue
-strings, and looks at herself in the looking-glass. There comes an
-expression a little later, 'a pretty neat damsel,' and again, 'a tight
-prim lass,' and I think that the ghost of a little girl shows in the
-looking-glass, but only for a moment, like the reflection of a bird
-flying over a pool of water. Richardson's characters are decreasingly
-real from their hearts outwards. They have no feet. But their hearts
-are so beautifully exhibited that we cannot ask for anything else.
-To quarrel over them with Richardson is like quarrelling with the
-delightful Euclid because no one has ever been able to draw a straight
-line that should really be length without breadth. Such a line does
-not exist outside his books, yet Euclid is all in the right when he
-talks of geometry. Pamela and Clarissa do not exist outside their
-propositions, yet Johnson, talking fairly honestly, was able to say
-that there was more knowledge of the human heart in a letter of
-Richardson's than in all _Tom Jones_.
-
-[The passion for respectability.]
-
-It is knowledge of the human heart from the girl's point of view--the
-unromantic girl, for Richardson could never bring himself to believe
-in great passions. He would never have used as the text of a novel
-that sentence from the New Testament that has inspired so many later
-story-tellers: 'Her sins are forgiven her because she loved much.'
-Richardson's only passion is one not usually so called, and that is
-a passion for respectability. The desire for respectability, for her
-children's sake if not for her own, is part of every woman's armour
-in the battle of this world. In Richardson's two best novels it is
-something far more than this, an obsession that love cannot conquer nor
-goodness override. In Clarissa it is so Quixotic, so forlorn a hope
-as to be noble; but Pamela's respectability is a little disgusting.
-What, after all, is Pamela's story but the tale of a servant-girl
-who declaims continually about her honesty, writes foolish verse
-about it, lets her head fall on her master's shoulder, and refuses to
-be his except as his wife? She is quite right, of course, and most
-estimable. But her affronted virtue does not seem much more than a
-practical commercial asset, when she successfully marries the man who
-by every means in his power has sought to destroy it. Clarissa, on
-the other hand, has nothing to gain, nothing even to retain, except
-her self-respect. The respect of Howes, Belfords, and Harlowes could
-weigh but little with a being lifted from ordinary Philistine life
-into a conflict as unworldly as hers. She has the ivory dignity of
-some flowers, and the curious power of the book that traces her
-misfortunes is due to the spectacle of so flowerlike and fragile a
-being engaged in a struggle so terribly unequal. The struggle itself
-could hardly have been imagined by a wholly masculine writer. It is
-a kind of elaborate proposition, not a picture of life. It is like a
-chess problem in which we know that white mates in two moves, and are
-interested only in seeing how he does it. In Richardson, as in Euclid,
-we know always what is coming. Our artistic pleasure is in the logic
-and sequence of the intervening steps. If you expect a theorem to turn
-into a problem or _vice versâ_, the inevitability of Richardson annoys
-you; but if you read him in the right spirit that quality is your chief
-delight.
-
-It is interesting to notice that Richardson, inventing girls' theorems,
-is unable to draw a hero in whom a man can believe. Lovelace, for
-example, is touched in in a way that makes women fall in love with
-him, but men feel for cobwebs in the air. Pamela's master is frankly
-incredible. And it is no bad illustration of Richardson's femininity
-that Charles Grandison, planned as the perfect man, has been found
-unbearable in the smoking-room, insipid at the tea-table, and has
-probably had no conquests but a few Georgian ladies'-maids. But the
-women, abstractions, algebraical formulæ, as they are, let us into
-secrets of the machinery of a woman's mind that no earlier novelist had
-been able to examine.
-
-[Richardson's influence.]
-
-Richardson's precise, intimate, feminine knowledge of women and
-feminine method of writing had a wider influence than that we are
-tracing in this chapter. He showed story-tellers a new world to conquer
-and quite unexplored possibilities in the telling of a tale. It was
-for this that he was translated by the Abbé Prévost, the Jesuit,
-soldier, priest and novelist, who wrote in _Manon Lescaut_ of a passion
-greater and more self-sacrificing than any that had come in the way of
-the little printer of Salisbury Court. And when St. Preux and Julie
-exchange those letters that brought a new freedom of sentiment into
-literature, Rousseau, who taught them how to write, had himself been
-taught by Richardson.
-
-[Illustration: FANNY BURNEY]
-
-[Fanny Burney.]
-
-I do not intend any detailed portraiture of the later writers of the
-feminine novel, but only in a brief mention of two of them to suggest
-the course they took in the development of their art, until in the
-nineteenth century it combined with and became indistinguishable from
-the masculine novel that held it at first in a not lightly to be
-reconciled hostility. Let us look along the bookshelf for a volume
-called _Evelina, or the History of a Young Lady's Entrance into the
-World_. Thirty years had passed between the publication of _Clarissa_
-and that of Fanny Burney's best book, and in those years Fielding and
-Smollett had written, and _Humphry Clinker_ had shown that it was
-possible to describe in letters other things than a series of attacks
-on the armour of respectability. Fanny Burney took more material
-with a lighter hand, stealing away the business of _The Tatler_, _The
-Spectator_, _The Citizen of the World_, and trying not only to 'draw
-characters from nature' but also to 'mark the manners of the time.'
-She had learnt from a diligent perusal of Richardson, avoided a too
-elaborate postal system, and made her butterfly task the easier by
-writing of herself, whereas he had to invent the Clarissas and Pamelas
-of his more bee-like labours.
-
-[Young lady's 'manners.']
-
-Fanny Burney was the daughter of a popular music-master, whose house
-was always full of all sorts of people, so that she had the best of
-opportunities for observing that surface of life which she was able so
-incomparably to reproduce. She was able to see manners in contrast. Now
-'manners' described by a man in a coffee-house--by Steele, for example,
-or Goldsmith, mean the habits and foibles of contemporary society.
-'Manners' 'marked' at a young lady's rosewood desk mean vulgarity and
-its opposite, and the various shades between the two. In the essayist's
-eyes, manners were simply manners, to be described each one for its
-own sake. The feminine novelist found manners either good or bad, and
-was concerned with the tracing of a gossamer thread of distinction.
-The story of Evelina is not so much that of her love-affair with Lord
-Orville, but of the suffering or satisfaction of a sensitive person
-exposed alternately to atmospheres of bad manners or good. Evelina
-threads her way shyly along the border-line, and illustrates both
-sides by their effects upon her happiness. We are sorrier for her when
-she hears Miss Branghton cry out joyfully, 'Miss is going to marry a
-Lord,' than when she is in more serious trouble over her acknowledgment
-by her father. All the minor characters for whom the story makes a
-frame are set there as types less of character than of behaviour.
-There is Mrs. Selwyn with her habit of 'setting down' young men, and
-her characteristic praise of Lord Orville, 'there must have been
-some mistake about the birth of that young man; he was, undoubtedly,
-designed for the last age; for he is really polite.' There is Captain
-Mirvan, representing good birth and brutality of manners; Madame Duval,
-low birth seeking to veil itself in lofty affectation; the Branghtons,
-frank vulgarity; Mr. Smith, the tinsel gentility of the Holborn beau.
-Each character is in the book in order to inflict its peculiar type
-of manners on the heroine, so that we may watch the result. Evelina
-herself, delicious as she is, is given to us as a touchstone between
-good breeding and vulgarity.
-
-[Feminine standards of delicacy.]
-
-Miss Burney marks very clearly the introduction of the feminine
-standards of delicacy that were to rule the English novel of the
-nineteenth century. Evelina's criticism of _Love for Love_, written
-less than a hundred years before she saw it, distinguishes honestly
-between her own point of view and that of the best of men. 'Though it
-(the play) was fraught with wit and entertainment, I hope I shall never
-see it represented again; for it is so extremely indelicate--to use
-the softest word I can--that Miss Mirvan and I were perpetually out of
-countenance, and could neither make any observations ourselves, nor
-venture to listen to those of others. This was the more provoking, as
-Lord Orville was in excellent spirits, and exceedingly entertaining.'
-
-[Illustration: JANE AUSTEN]
-
-[Jane Austen.]
-
-Twenty years after _Evelina_, the novel of femininity took a further
-step in technique and breadth of design. Miss Austen, who in the last
-decade of the eighteenth century was writing the novels that were not
-to be published till after the first decade of the nineteenth, learnt
-from both her precursors. She was a proper follower of Richardson, but
-dispensed altogether with the artifice of letters, although the whole
-of her work is so intimate and particular in expression that it would
-almost seem to be written in a letter to the reader.[7] Like Miss
-Burney she had read the masculine novels of an ordinary life, whose
-strings were not so finely stretched as those of life in the books of
-the sentimental little printer; she had read Fielding and Smollett and
-the Essayists, and Miss Burney herself, but she carried the satire
-she had learnt from them deeper than Miss Burney's criticism of well
-or ill-bred manners. She deals more directly with existence. Miss
-Burney with lovable skill made her puppets play her game. Miss Austen's
-puppets played a game of their own. She remarked before writing _Emma_,
-'I am going to take a heroine whom no one but myself will much like,'
-exactly as if she were a little girl rather capriciously choosing a
-new plaything. But Emma, once chosen, illustrates no special theorem,
-and is compelled to tread no tight-rope over the abyss of vulgarity.
-Miss Austen's world has the vitality of independent life, and is yet
-close under observation, like society in a doll's house. Her people are
-alive and real, and yet so small that she found it easy to see round
-them and be amused. Indeed, she grew so accustomed to laughing at them
-that she came to include the reader in her play. I am not sure if it
-would not be wise for any one who found a page of hers a little dull
-or incomprehensible, to consider very carefully and seriously if she
-is not being mischievous enough and insolent enough to win her silvery
-laugh from his own self. To read her is like being in the room with an
-unscrupulously witty woman; it is delightful, but more than a trifle
-dangerous.
-
-[The analysis of the heart.]
-
-But Miss Austen's satire is not so important as the clear, keen sight
-that made it possible. The feminine novel finds its justification
-and characteristic in the quick light gossiping knowledge of Miss
-Burney, in Miss Austen's bric-à-brac of observation, in Richardson's
-topographical accuracy among the hidden alleys and byways of the
-heart. Its tenderness of detail is its most valuable contribution to
-story-telling, associated though it is with feminine standards of
-decency, and the sharp point of feminine raillery. The first of these
-concomitants is a gift of doubtful, and certainly not universal,
-virtue. The second is no more than a variation, a different-tinted,
-other-textured version of the satire of men. But the gift to which
-they were attached has made possible some of the finest work of later
-artists, in those stories whose absorbing interest is the unravelling
-of tangled skeins of intricate psychology. Theirs is a minuteness in
-the dissection of the heart quite different from, and indeed hostile
-to, the free-and-easy way of men like Fielding and Smollett, and
-wherever we meet with this fine and delicate surgery practice we can
-trace its ancestry with some assurance to the feminine novel of the
-eighteenth century.
-
-
-
-
-FIELDING, SMOLLETT, AND THE MASCULINE NOVEL
-
-
-
-
-FIELDING, SMOLLETT, AND THE MASCULINE NOVEL
-
-
-[The English Renaissance.]
-
-I HAVE always felt that the English Renaissance was considerably later
-than that of France or Italy, and happened in the eighteenth century.
-When we speak of the Italian or the French Renaissance we mean the
-times in the histories of Italy or France when the peculiar genius
-of each of these countries showed the most energetic and satisfying
-efflorescence. In Italy and in France this time was that of the revival
-of classical learning, when Boccaccio lectured on Dante at Florence
-and Ronsard gardened and rhymed. In England, although from the time
-of Chaucer to the time of Shakespeare we were picking continental
-flowers, and flowering ourselves individually and gorgeously, yet we
-had no general efflorescence in our national right, no sudden and
-complete self-portraiture in several arts at once. And this in the
-eighteenth century was what we had. All our national characteristics
-were unashamedly on view. Our solidity, our care for matter of fact,
-our love of oversea adventure, were exhibited in Defoe. Our sturdy
-spirituality had only recently found expression in Bunyan. Richardson
-discovered the young person who, rustling her petticoats, sits with
-so demure an air of permanence on Victorian literature, and represents
-indeed so real a part of our national character that we shall never be
-able to forget her blushes altogether. Our serious turn for morality
-showed itself at once in the aims all our authors professed, and in the
-pictures of Hogarth who, with courage unknown elsewhere, dared to paint
-ugliness as ugly. This is the century that represents us in the eyes
-of the world. If we would think of the Italian spirit we remember the
-_Decameron_; if of the French, we remember Ronsard's 'Mignonne, allons
-voir si la rose,' or Marot's 'Mignonne, je vous donne le bon jour.'
-But if a Frenchman tries to describe an Englishman his model is not a
-Chaucer but a Jean Bull, and the only adequate portraits of Jean Bull
-are to be found in the novels of Fielding and Smollett.
-
-[Illustration: HENRY FIELDING]
-
-[Two points of view.]
-
-Out of this general efflorescence were to spring two branches of
-story-telling different and hostile from the start. The novel was
-given sex. Richardson had scarcely invented the feminine novel before
-Fielding and Smollett were at work producing books of a masculinity
-correspondingly pronounced. Fielding was the first to mark the
-difference, and Richardson to the end of his life hated him for writing
-_Joseph Andrews_. It often happens that one philosopher hates another
-whose system though less elaborate is obviously founded on a broader
-basis than his own. Fielding could afford to laugh at Richardson, but
-Richardson could never laugh at Fielding. He could only enjoy the
-lesser satisfaction of holding his rival accursed. Their upbringings
-had been as different as the resulting books. Eton, law studies at
-Leyden and the Middle Temple, were a different training for the art of
-story-telling than the Dick Whittington youth of the little business
-man. Richardson saw the game of life from the outside. Harry Fielding
-knew the rough and tumble. Richardson was all for virtue; so was
-Fielding, but, as he would have put it himself, for virtue that is
-virtue. Virtue at the expense of nature he could no more understand
-than Benvenuto Cellini, who, if the facts in the case of Pamela had
-been set before him, would have thought her a devilish artful young
-woman, and, if he had met her, congratulated her upon her capture.
-Fielding had a short, rough and ready creed, and that was that a good
-heart goes farther than a capful of piety towards keeping the world a
-habitable place.
-
-[_Pamela_ and _Joseph Andrews_.]
-
-_Pamela_ made him laugh. He wanted to make money by writing, so he sat
-down to put the laugh on paper, with the ultimate notion of filling
-his pocket by publishing a squib. He set out to parody Pamela in the
-person of her brother Mr. Joseph Andrews. He had not gone very far in
-the performance before Parson Adams came into the story, and became
-so prodigiously delightful that it occurred to Fielding that he had
-here as admirable a couple for adventure as Cervantes himself could
-have wished, with the result that Mr. Andrews' correspondence does
-not compare at all favourably with his sister's, while his biography
-is infinitely more entertaining. When the book was done, its creator
-printed on the title-page: 'Written in imitation of the Manner of
-Cervantes, Author of Don Quixote,' made no very particular reference
-to his original purpose, and described his book as 'A Comic Epic in
-Prose.' The masculine novel was on its way. Like _Don Quixote_ or
-_Le Roman Comique_ it represented a smiling move towards reality, or
-the criticism of reality, in Fielding's hands through the high and
-difficult art of ridicule, in the hands of Smollett, whose first book
-was published six years later, through the easier art of caricature.
-
-These two men between them made the masculine novel of the eighteenth
-century. Its scope and character are best mapped out by a study
-of their respective lives, which were sufficiently unlike to make
-their books almost as different from each other's as they were from
-Richardson's.
-
-[Fielding and Smollett.]
-
-They both looked on man as man, a simple creature seldom wholly bad.
-They were not the fellows to tolerate humbug about platonic love,
-or the soul, or religion. Religion meant the Established Church,
-and a parson was a man, good or bad, a representative of the State
-perhaps, but not a representative of God. Love was no opal passion
-between Endymion and the moon. It meant desire between man and woman,
-as tender as you liked, but still desire. It was as simple a thing as
-valour, which meant ability to use the fists and stand fire. Fielding
-and Smollett knew a fairly brutal world. But their positions in it
-had been different. Fielding had always had his head above water. He
-is continually thinking of fair play, and feels, as we do, a thrill
-at the heart when he sees Tom Jones and an innkeeper shake hands
-after bleeding each other's noses. Smollett had had a harder time.
-He had known what it was to be denied the privileges of a gentleman.
-He had been in a subordinate position in the navy when that was an
-organisation of licensed brutality. He was as accustomed to seeing
-men's bodies cross-questioned, as Fielding to reading law-cases and
-examining men's minds. He writes always on a more animal level than
-Fielding. After every fight he lines up his characters for medical
-treatment:--
-
- '"'n' well," says he, "'n' how
- Are yer arms, 'n' legs, 'n' liver, 'n' lungs, 'n' bones
- a-feelin' now?"'
-
-Fielding only inquires after their hearts. Put their portraits side
-by side, and the difference is clear. Fielding's is the face of the
-fortunate man who has had his bad times and come smiling through;
-Smollett's that of the man not bruised but permanently scarred by the
-experiences he has suffered. An old sailor once said to me that you
-can judge of the roughness of a man's employment by the coarseness of
-his language; those whose work is roughest, using the coarsest words.
-Fielding is seldom disgusting. His heroes are constantly putting their
-feet into it; but not into unnecessary filth. It is impossible to say
-the same of Smollett.
-
-[Smollett and Le Sage.]
-
-Their choice of models was characteristic; _Joseph Andrews_ being
-written in imitation of the gentle banter of Cervantes, while _Roderick
-Random_ copied the more acid satire of Le Sage. Indeed, Le Sage
-was not serious enough. 'The disgraces of Gil Blas,' says Smollett
-in his preface, 'are for the most part such as rather excite mirth
-than compassion; he himself laughs at them; and his transitions from
-distress to happiness, or at least ease, are so sudden, that neither
-the reader has time to pity him, nor himself to be acquainted with
-affliction. This conduct, in my opinion, not only deviates from
-probability, but prevents that generous indignation, which ought to
-animate the reader against the sordid and vicious disposition of the
-world.' That is a moving and very remarkable paragraph. Between those
-lines is the memory of more than enough 'acquaintance with affliction,'
-and there is something terrible in the assumption, made with such
-absolute conviction, that good luck 'deviates from probability.'
-Smollett had not known much happiness, and found so light-hearted an
-aim as Le Sage's impossible. His own was almost vengeful. 'I have
-attempted to represent modest merit struggling with every difficulty to
-which a friendless orphan is exposed, from his own want of experience,
-as well as from the selfishness, envy, malice, and base indifference of
-mankind.' Roderick Random is a rogue and a skunk, but we cannot blame
-Tobias Smollett if he did not know it. Random's more objectionable
-qualities are those that pull him through his difficulties. A nicer man
-would have gone under. The difficulties are at fault for making not
-Random but Smollett what he was.
-
-[The technique of the English novel.]
-
-The technique of the English novel was more elaborate than that of its
-models. Just as _Joseph Andrews_ is more orderly than _Don Quixote_, so
-_Roderick Random_ is a step between the pure rogue novel, the string
-of adventures only connected by the person of the adventurer, and the
-modern novel of definite plot. _Don Quixote_ and _Gil Blas_ could be
-cut off anywhere. Their creators had only to kill them. But the curtain
-could not be rung down on the adventures of Random or Andrew before
-quite a number of different threads had been properly gathered and
-explained. There were a few pretty wild coincidences to be discovered.
-Rory, Joseph, and Fanny all find their true parents; perhaps but rough
-and ready means to give rotundity to a story, but still pleasant
-mysteries, to be kept like sweetmeats and dessert as lures for flagging
-appetites. The novel had assumed some of the elaborate interest of the
-_nouvelle_, as practised by Cervantes and the Elizabethans, and the
-influence of the stage perhaps partly accounts for the construction
-of the English imitations, more consistent than that of their Spanish
-and Franco-Spanish models. The art of play-writing had reached its
-period of most scrupulous technique so recently that these two men who
-had failed in the theatre were not likely to forget its methods when
-experimenting with the more plastic art of narrative.
-
-[Fielding the better artist.]
-
-Of the two, Fielding is always the better artist. He is more interested
-in his art, more single-minded. He never forgets his duties as a
-novelist, and continually turns to the reader, just as if he were a
-sculptor executing a difficult piece of work in the presence of an
-audience whose admiration he expects. He was ready to laugh at himself
-for it too: 'We assure the reader we would rather have suffered half
-mankind to be hanged than have saved one contrary to the strictest laws
-of unity and probability.' He did not always keep up this admirable
-conscientiousness; but he did so more consistently than Smollett.
-
-The delicacy of their craftsmanship is best compared not in their
-greatest books but in those two novels in which they essayed the same
-task, the portraiture of a rogue, and a rogue not after the merry
-sympathetic fashion of Lazarillo, but one whom the authors themselves
-accounted a villain and expected their readers to detest.
-
-[_Jonathan Wild._]
-
-The ironic biographer of Jonathan Wild realised the difficulties of
-the undertaking. He saw that unless he adopted an attitude which would
-make it proper for him always to express approval of his hero, his
-readers would begin to cast this way and that, not knowing whether to
-sympathise or hate, as the genius of the author or the villainy of the
-hero were alternately prominent in their eyes. Accordingly, choosing
-the name of a real and famous gallows-bird who had been hung some
-twenty years before, Fielding took his tone from those little penny
-biographies that used to be hawked among the crowd who waited at Tyburn
-to see their hero swing. He ironically takes this tone; and sustains it
-without a false note for a couple of hundred pages. How admirably he
-uses it:--
-
- 'The hero, though he loved the chaste Laetitia with excessive
- tenderness, was not of that low snivelling breed of mortals
- who, as is generally expressed, _tie themselves to a woman's
- apron-strings_; in a word, who are afflicted with that mean, base,
- low vice or virtue, as it is called, of constancy.'
-
-And again in the passage that sums up the book:--
-
- 'He laid down several maxims, as the certain means of attaining
- greatness, to which, in his own pursuit of it, he constantly
- adhered.
-
- As--
-
- 1. Never to do more mischief than was necessary to the effecting
- of his purpose; for that mischief was too precious a thing to be
- thrown away.
-
- 2. To know no distinction of men from affection; but to sacrifice
- all with equal readiness to his interest.
-
- 3. Never to communicate more of an affair than was necessary to the
- person who was to execute it.
-
- 4. Not to trust him who hath deceived you, nor who knows he has
- been deceived by you.
-
- 5. To forgive no enemy; but to be cautious and often dilatory in
- revenge.
-
- 6. To shun poverty and distress, and to ally himself as close as
- possible to power and riches.
-
- 7. To maintain a constant gravity in his countenance and behaviour,
- and to affect wisdom on all occasions.
-
- 8. To foment eternal jealousies in his gang, one of another.
-
- 9. Never to reward any one equal to his merit; but always to
- insinuate that the reward was above it.
-
- 10. That all men were knaves or fools, and much the greater number
- a composition of both.
-
- 11. That a good name, like money, must be parted with or at least
- greatly risked, in order to bring the owner any advantage.
-
- 12. That virtues, like precious stones, were easily counterfeited;
- that the counterfeits in both cases adorned the wearer equally;
- and that very few had knowledge or discernment sufficient to
- distinguish the counterfeit jewels from the real.
-
- 13. That many men were undone by not going deep enough in roguery;
- as in gaming any man may be a loser who doth not play the whole
- game.
-
- 14. That men proclaim their own virtues, as shopkeepers expose
- their goods, in order to profit by them.
-
- 15. That the heart was the proper seat of hatred, and the
- countenance of affection and friendship.'
-
-The whole scheme is worked out with a scrupulous attention to the main
-idea, and a consistency of mood that would not have been unworthy one
-of the self-conscious artists of a hundred years later. Poe himself
-could have built no more skilfully, and, lacking Fielding's knowledge
-of rascaldom, the straw for his bricks would not have been so good.
-
-[_Ferdinand, Count Fathom._]
-
-Smollett had the knowledge; but, a less perspicuous artist, did not
-realise the difficulties of using it. His villain is never frank in his
-villainy. Smollett intended from the beginning to disobey Fielding's
-principle, meant to save his rogue from the gallows, meant to do it
-all along, and was consequently handicapped in making him respectably
-wicked. Ferdinand, Count Fathom, does damnable deeds, but his author's
-purpose is completely nullified by his promise of eventual conversion.
-The book is not true to itself, but fails because Smollett was not
-sufficient of an artist to be able to send his hero to hell.
-
-It is interesting to notice in one of the dullest scenes of this
-unsatisfactory book, that Smollett touched for the first time, in a
-fumbling, hesitant manner, the note of quasi-supernatural horror that
-was soon to be sounded with clarity and almost too facile skill. In the
-hero's device for the undoing of Celinda there is the first warning of
-the Radcliffes and Lewises and their kind, with their groans upon the
-battlements, their figures in white, and their unearthly music in the
-wind. Smollett did not wait long enough to find out what could be done
-with this new sensation. He jangled the note, and, in his inartistic
-way, passed on to paint and to reform the wickedness of the Count.
-
-[Illustration: TOBIAS SMOLLETT]
-
-[Smollett the more versatile.]
-
-I am a little ungracious to Smollett in saying so loud that he was an
-artist inferior to Fielding. Inferior he was, but when I set their
-best books side by side, I remember that there is little to choose
-between the pleasures they have given me, and am compelled to admit
-that the less scrupulous Smollett had the wider range. I read _Tom
-Jones_ in one sitting of twenty-four hours, and should like to write
-an essay on it, but can find no excuse for discussing here that epic
-of good-heartedness, since its characteristics are not different from
-those already noticed in _Joseph Andrews_. But _Humphry Clinker_ would
-have held me for as long if it had had as many pages, and in the
-history of the art, has, as an example of the novel in letters, an
-interest wholly separate from that of _Roderick Random_, which is a
-specimen of the picaresque. When Smollett came to write that book he
-was fifty years old and just about to die. He seems to have forgotten
-his old feud with life, and to look at things with a kindlier eye
-as one just ready to depart. His late-won detachment helped him to
-a scheme as clear as one of Fielding's, although even in this he is
-sometimes submerged in human nature. His notion was to describe the
-same scenes and events simultaneously from several points of view, in
-letters from different persons, so as to keep a story moving gently
-forward, with half a dozen personalities revolving round it, able to
-realise themselves or be realised in their own letters or those of
-their friends. In none of his other books are the characters so rounded
-and complete. There is Matthew Bramble, the old knight, outwardly
-morose and secretly generous; his sister, an old maid determined not to
-remain one, for ever grumbling at her brother's generosities; Lyddy,
-their romantic niece, and Jerry, their young blood of a nephew; and, as
-persons of the counterplot, Mistress Winifred Jenkins and Mary Jones;
-not to speak of the ubiquitous Clinker. The letters tell the whole
-story, and yet, written long after Richardson's, they have an older
-manner. Richardson's letters, with all their passionate reiteration
-of detail, do not concern themselves with foibles. They do not make
-you smile at their writers, and if you had laughed, as Fielding did,
-he would have been prodigiously annoyed. Smollett's letters have the
-same aim as the letters of the _Spectator_ or the _Tatler_. They
-are different only in less brilliant polish, and in their grouping
-round a story. The Humphry Clinker correspondence is as important as
-the letters of Clarissa in forming the most delicate and humorous
-epistolary style employed by Miss Evelina Anville.
-
-[The motives of the masculine novel.]
-
-The extreme difficulty I have experienced throughout this chapter
-in thinking of the technique of these novelists, instead of their
-material, is a tribute to their power. It is the same with Hogarth.
-It is impossible to get at the artist for thinking of the life upon
-his canvases. It is almost impossible to consider Fielding or Smollett
-as technicians (I have had to do it in their least human books),
-for thinking of the England that they represented. And now that I
-am looking about for a concluding paragraph on the work of these
-two men, when I should be summing up the general characteristics of
-their craftsmanship, I look at the pile of their books on the table
-before me, and feel a full and comfortable stomach, and cannot get
-out of my nose the smell of beer and beef and cheese associated as
-closely with their pages as lavender with the pages of _Cranford_.
-What an England it was in their day. Mr. Staytape carried Rory 'into
-an alehouse, where he called for some beer and bread and cheese, on
-which we _breakfasted_.' 'Our landlord and we sat down at a board, and
-dined upon a shin of beef most deliciously; our reckoning amounting to
-twopence halfpenny each, bread and small beer included.' The bright
-glances of Mistress Waters 'hit only a vast piece of beef which he was
-carrying into his plate, and harmless spent their force.' Her sighs
-were drowned 'by the coarse bubbling of some bottled ale.' Square
-meals are the best antidotes for sentiment, and in every scene of
-these novelists there is always some one who has fed too recently to
-allow any hairsplitting delicacy in the room with him. No confessional
-disentangling of emotions, but beer, beef, cheese, a good heart, a
-sound skin, and the lack of these things, are the motives of the
-masculine novel.
-
-
- A NOTE ON STERNE
-
- STERNE hardly comes within the scope of this book, since his was
- the art, not of telling stories, but of withholding them, not of
- keeping things on the move, but of keeping them on the point of
- moving. It is not without much difficulty and two or three chapters
- that a character of Sterne's crosses the room. The nine books
- of _Tristram Shandy_ bring him through the midwife's hands, and
- a little further. I believe we hear breeches talked of for him.
- Another nine books would perhaps let him put one leg into them.
- _Tristram Shandy_ is a continuous denial of the forms that Fielding
- and Smollett were doing their best to fix. But it is read by many
- who find them superficial, because Sterne writes of universal,
- whereas they write of a limited and particular humanity. They
- write of a Mr. Jones or a Mr. Random, while the hero of Sterne's
- book is man. He begins, as he puts it himself, _ab ovo_. He saw
- that the whole of humanity is a constellation revolving round the
- birth of a child, and contrived to introduce into his book every
- imaginable incident connected with that event. If Tristram Shandy
- does not grow up quick enough to take to himself a wife, My Uncle
- Toby is taken as a husband by the Widow Wadman. If he does not
- die, Yorick does. If My Uncle Toby's affairs do not go far enough
- to produce a baby, Tristram is born. In this book, where nothing
- seems to happen, everything does. It is the Life and Opinions, not
- of Tristram Shandy, but of Humanity, illustrated, not in a single
- character over a long period, but in half a dozen over a short one.
- For the story of the three generations of the giants, Rabelais
- needed land and sea, Paris and Touraine. For the adventures of his
- strolling players, Scarron needed a dozen little towns along the
- Loire, with inns and châteaux and what not. But for the adventures
- of Humanity, Sterne, who learnt from both of them, needed only a
- bowling-green, a study, a bedroom, and a parlour. There is really
- little else of background to the story. And it is all there; birth,
- love, death, and all the sad comedy of man misunderstood, and
- fortunate when, like Uncle Toby, he does not try to understand, the
- beginning in triviality, and the end in 'Alas, poor Yorick!'
-
-
-
-
-PART II
-
-ROMANTICISM
-
-
-
-
-CHATEAUBRIAND AND ROMANTICISM
-
-
-
-
-CHATEAUBRIAND AND ROMANTICISM
-
-
-[Chateaubriand and the French Revolution.]
-
-THERE are some men who seem epitomes of their periods, of all the
-weaknesses, strengths, ideals and follies and wisdoms of their times.
-All the tangled skeins of different movements seem embroidered into
-the pattern of a face; and that face is theirs. We seek in them the
-years in which they lived, and are never disappointed. Sir Philip
-Sidney means the age of Elizabeth, Dr. Johnson the common-sense English
-eighteenth century, Rousseau the stirring of revolutionary France,
-Goethe the awakening of Germany. Of these men was Chateaubriand. He
-was born before the storm and died after it. He gathered up the best
-of the things that were before the revolution, and handed them on to
-the men who, when the revolution had left a new France, were to make
-that new country the centre of European literature. Rousseau and the
-Romantics meet in him. He wrote when France, her eyes still bright and
-wide after the sight of blood, was seeking in religion for one thing,
-at least, that might be covered by the tossing waves of revolution and
-yet survive. Christianity in his finest story is the rock on which
-his lovers break themselves. And Christianity was the first earthwork
-attacked before the revolution, and the first reoccupied afterwards.
-
-Chateaubriand stands curiously in the midst of the opposing elements.
-Like Byron he was a patrician and a fighter. He too would have died
-for freedom. But whereas Byron fought, contemptuously sometimes, for
-revolutionaries, Chateaubriand fought against them.
-
-When some of the ragged ones marched joyously down his street carrying
-the heads of two of their enemies bleeding on the ends of pikes, he
-cried at them, 'Brigands! Is this what you mean by Liberty?' and
-declared that if he had had a gun he would have shot them down like
-wolves. And if Chateaubriand had not been an aristocrat, he could never
-so well have represented his times. He would have fought and written
-as a revolutionist, instead of caring passionately for one party, and
-pinning to it the ideals of the other, so claiming both for his own.
-Everything that could make him one with his period and country was his.
-After a childhood of severe repression, he had seen the fall of the
-Bastille, and then sought liberty and the North-West Passage, coming
-back from America to find the revolution successful against himself.
-Could any man's life be so perfect an analogy of the meteor-like
-progress of France? France also sought liberty and a North-West
-Passage, quicker than all others; France also was to return and find
-the ground aquiver beneath her feet.
-
-[Illustration: JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU]
-
-[Jean-Jacques Rousseau.]
-
-After that she was to be mistress of Europe. The three stages of
-Romanticism correspond with these three stages of France; the last that
-of Hugo and Gautier and Dumas, the Romanticism of 1830, promised by
-that of Chateaubriand, itself made possible by the unrestful writing
-of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. It is impossible to understand any one of
-the three without referring to the others. Rousseau was the son of a
-watchmaker, in a day when superiority of intellect in a man of low
-birth won him either neglect or the most insufferable patronage.
-His mother died in bearing him, and his father, although he made a
-second marriage, never mentioned her without tears. He seems to have
-been a very simple-hearted man, and found such pleasure in romances
-that he would sit up all night reading them to his little son, going
-ashamedly to bed in the morning when the swallows began to call in
-the eaves. These two traits in his father are characteristic of the
-work of Rousseau himself. His life was spent in emphasising the
-compatibility of low birth with lofty animation, and so in preparing
-that democratisation of literature that generously attributes humanity
-to men who are not gentlemen. Richardson gave him a suitable narrative
-form for what he had to say, and _La Nouvelle Héloïse_ is a novel in
-letters whose hero is a poor tutor in love with his pupil. The book
-is full of an emotional oratory so fresh and sincere that it seems as
-if the ice of fifty years of passionless reasoning has suddenly broken
-over the springs of the human heart. There is in it too an Ossianic
-sharing of feelings with Nature, as if man had realised with the tears
-in his eyes that he had not always lived in towns.
-
-[The world of the Revolution.]
-
-Chateaubriand had not Rousseau's birthright of handicap. He could not
-feel the righteous energy of the watchmaker's son against a people who
-did not know their own language and were yet in a position to employ
-him as a footman. He was outside that quarrel. He left Rousseau's
-social reform behind him on the threshold of his world, but had learnt
-from him to carry his heart upon his sleeve, and to cry, like _Ossian_,
-'The murmur of thy streams, O Lara! brings back the memory of the past.
-The sound of thy woods, Garmallar, is lovely in mine ear.' He took with
-him Rousseau's twin worships of passion and nature into the melancholy
-turmoil that was waiting for him, sad with an unrest not of classes but
-of a nation. He knew, like France, what it was to question everything
-while standing firm upon nothing. In that maelstrom nothing seemed
-fixed; there was nothing a man might grasp for a moment to keep his
-head above the waters of infinite doubt. Everything seemed possible,
-and much of the Romantic melancholy is a despairing cry for a little
-impossibility from which at least there could be no escape. It is
-one thing to question religion by the light of atheism, or atheism by
-the light of religion; it is another thing, and far more terrible, to
-question both while sure of neither, and to see not one word in all the
-universe, not God, nor Man, nor State, nor Church, without a question
-mark at its side, a ghastly reminder of uncertainty, like, in some old
-engravings, the waiting figure of Death muffled in each man's shadow.
-
-[_Atala._]
-
-That was the world of the Revolution, a world whose permanent
-instability had been suddenly made manifest by a violent removal of the
-apparently stable crust. With the overturning of one mountain every
-other shuddered in its bed, and seemed ready at any moment to shake
-with crash and groan into the valleys. This was the world for whose
-expression the face of Chateaubriand, nervous, passionate, the fire of
-vision in his eye, the wind of chaos in his tempestuous hair, seems so
-marvellously made. This was the world in which, like the spirit of his
-age, he wrote the books the times expected because they were their own.
-_Atala_ and _René_, but particularly _Atala_, seemed to be the old,
-vague promises of Rousseau and _Ossian_, reaffirmed with the clarity
-of a silver trumpet. Chactas and Atala, those savage lovers, who 'took
-their way towards the star that never moves, guiding their steps by the
-moss on the tree stems,' walked like young deities of light before
-these people who had known the half-mummied courtesies of an eighteenth
-century civilisation. 'She made him a cloak of the inner bark of the
-ash, and mocassins of the musk rat's skin, and he set on her head a
-wreath of blue mallows, and on her neck red berries of the azalea,
-smiling as he did so to see how fair she was.' The world is young
-again, and man has won his way back into Eden, conscious of sorrow,
-conscious of evil, but alive and unafraid to be himself.
-
-[Nature and emotion.]
-
-Chateaubriand carried further than Rousseau the transfiguration of
-nature by emotion, although in _Atala_ nature is still a stage effect,
-subjected to its uses as illustration of the feelings of the humans in
-the tale. Chateaubriand tunes up the elements with crash of thunder,
-bright forked lightning, and fall of mighty tree, to the moment when,
-in the supreme crisis the hand of Atala's God intervenes between the
-lovers, and the bell of the forest hermitage sounds in the appropriate
-silence. But in those vivid, fiery descriptions there is already
-something besides the theatrical, a new generosity of sentiment that
-was to let Barye make lions and tigers instead of what would once
-have been rather impersonal decorations, and to allow Corot to give
-landscapes their own personality without always seeking to impose on
-them the irrelevant interest of human figures. Nature is never excluded
-from the story, and when the action is less urgent the setting is given
-a greater freedom. The lovers never meet on a studio background,
-but are always seen with trees and rivers, and forest dawn and forest
-night, more real than any that had been painted before. Chateaubriand
-is never content to call a tree a tree or a bird a bird, but gives them
-the dignity of their own names. Aurora no longer rises from her rosy
-bed in the approved convention for the dawn, but a bar of gold shapes
-itself in the east, the sparrow-hawks call from the rocks, and the
-martens retire to the hollows of the elms.
-
-[Illustration: FRANÇOIS RENÉ DE CHATEAUBRIAND]
-
-[Particularity in setting.]
-
-It was through caring for his setting in this way that Chateaubriand
-came as if by accident to the discovery of local colour. He wanted
-his savages to love in the wilderness, and happening to have seen a
-wilderness, reproduced it, and made his savages not merely savages but
-Muskogees, fashioned their talk to fit their race, and made it quite
-clear that this tale, at any rate, could not be imagined as passing
-on the Mountains of the Moon. When the older story-tellers named a
-locality they did little more than the Elizabethan stage managers, who
-placed a label on the stage and expected it to be sufficient to conjure
-up a forest or a battlefield. Chateaubriand, in making his writing
-more completely pictorial, visualised his scenes in detail, and so
-showed the Romantics the way to that close distinction between country
-and country, age and age, race and race, that made the artists of the
-nineteenth century richer than any who were before them in variety of
-subject, and in the material of self-expression.
-
-[Christianity.]
-
-The Christianity of _Atala_ was the religion that Chateaubriand
-offered to his country in _Le Génie du Christianisme_. I can never be
-quite sure that it was his own, but in that amazing book, divided and
-subdivided like an ancient treatise on some occult science, he showed
-with passionate use of reasoning and erudition that Christianity was
-not the ugly thing that it had been pictured by the eighteenth century
-philosophers, and, more, that it at least was older than France,
-and permanent in a world where kings, emperors, and republics swung
-hither and thither like dead leaves in the wind. The teaching came to
-Paris like a gospel. These people, anchorless as they were, were not
-difficult converts, because they were eager to be converted, and to be
-able, if only for a moment in their lives, to whisper, 'I believe' in
-something other than uncertainty. All society became Christian for a
-time, and when that time passed, the effects of the book did not all
-pass with it. The artists of a younger generation had learned that
-Christianity was the belief that had brought most loveliness into the
-world, and that the Gods of Antiquity were not the only deities who
-were favourable to beautiful things. The false taste of the end of the
-eighteenth century had been pierced by Gothic spires, and through the
-dull cloud of correct and half-hearted imitation showed again the
-pinnacles and gargoyles and flying buttresses of the naïve and trustful
-mediæval art. Atala joins hands with Nicolete, and links Victor Hugo
-with the builders of Notre Dame.
-
-[The art of Chateaubriand survives the battle in which it was used.]
-
-There is little wonder that a writer who answered so fully the needs
-of his own generation, and did so much to cut a way for the generation
-to come, became instantly famous, immediately execrated. Chateaubriand
-wrote: 'La polémique est mon allure naturelle.... Il me faut toujours
-un adversaire, n'importe où.' In 1800 he had no difficulty in finding
-them. But it takes two to make a quarrel. It would not have been
-surprising if books that belonged so absolutely to the battles of their
-times should have struck their blows, and been then forgotten for want
-of opposition. Manifestations of the time spirit, and particularly
-fighting manifestations, not infrequently manifest it only to the
-time, and are worthless to future generations. _Atala_, after setting
-in an uproar the Paris of 1802 is for us but a beautiful piece of
-colour whose pattern has faded away. Unless we can feel with the men
-of the dawn that we are tossing on mad waves, clutching at religion
-as at a rock beneath the shifting waters, and breathlessly thankful
-for any proof of its steadfastness and power: unless we can remember
-with them the old love of drawing-rooms and bent knees and kisses on
-gloved hands, and feel with them a passionate novelty in the love of
-wild things in the open air; unless we can remember the tamed, docile
-nature of the pastorals, and open our eyes upon a first view of any
-sort of real country; unless, in a word, we can dream back a hundred
-years, the beauty of _Atala_ is like that of an old battle-cry:--
-
- 'So he cried, as the fight grew thick at the noon,
- _Two red roses across the moon_!'
-
-The cry no longer calls to battle. The combatants are dead. The bugle
-sounds to armies of white bones, and we who overhear it think only of
-the skill of the trumpeter. And Chateaubriand had something in him
-that was independent of his doctrines, independent of his enemies.
-Flaubert, looking back to him over the years, saw in his books, when
-the dust of their battles settled about them, early examples of a most
-scrupulous technique. Chateaubriand the fighter, the man of his time,
-was forgotten in the old master of a new prose. These books shaped in
-the din of battle were models for men writing in a fat, quiet day of
-peace. Then it was possible, the clangour no longer sounding in the
-ears, to notice the mastery of form, the elaboration, carried so far
-and no further, of the main idea into the significant detail that was
-to make the idea alive; then became clear the economy that makes of
-every fact a vivid illustration of some trait in the people of the
-story, a heightening of the lights or a deepening of the shadows of the
-tale.
-
-
-
-
-SCOTT AND ROMANTICISM
-
-
-
-
-SCOTT AND ROMANTICISM
-
-
-[Scott's place in the romantic movement.]
-
-THE genius of a man like Scott does not leap into the world a complete
-and novel creation, like Minerva from the skull of Jupiter, ready
-for battle, and accoutred in the armour that it never afterwards
-forsakes. Nor does it with the strength of its own hand turn one world
-into another, or the audience of Fielding and Smollett into that
-of the Waverley Novels. The world is prepared for it; it finds its
-weapons lying round its cradle, and works its miracle with the world's
-co-operation.
-
-Romanticism, although, in our indolence, we like to think of it as the
-work of a single man, as a stream gushing from the hard rock at the
-stroke of a Moses, was no conjuring trick, nor sudden invention, but a
-force as old as story-telling. The rock had been built gradually over
-it, and was as gradually taken away. It suits our convenience and the
-pictorial inclination of our minds to imagine it as the work of one man
-or two; but there is hardly need to remind ourselves of facts we have
-so wilfully forgotten, and that, if we choose, we can trace without
-difficulty a more diffuse as well as a more ancient origin of the
-spring.
-
-Romanticism was a movement too large and too various to be defined in
-a paragraph, or to allow an essay on any single man to describe, even
-in the art of story-telling, its several sources, and the innumerable
-streams that flowed from them to fertilise the nineteenth century.
-It carried with it liberty and toleration, liberty of expression and
-toleration of all kinds of spiritual and physical vitality. It was
-comparable with and related to the French Revolution. It allowed men
-to see each other in their relations with the universe as well as with
-each other, and made existence a thing about which it was possible
-to be infinitely curious. Old desires for terror and fantasy and
-magnificence arose in the most civilised of minds. Glamour was thrown
-over the forest and the palace, and the modern and ancient worlds came
-suddenly together, so that all the ages seemed to be contemporary and
-all conditions of human life simultaneous and full of promise.
-
-Scott was a part of this revivified world, and his importance in it
-is not that of its inventor, but of the man who brought so many of
-its qualities into the art of story-telling that his novels became a
-secondary inspiration, and moved men as different as Hugo, Balzac, and
-Dumas, to express themselves in narrative.
-
-[Illustration: SIR WALTER SCOTT]
-
-[Romanticism before the Waverley Novels.]
-
-Before the writing of the Waverley Novels, Romanticism in English
-narrative had shown itself but a stuttering and one-legged
-abortion, remarkable only for its extravagances. It had not, except in
-poetry, been humane enough to be literature. It had made only violent
-gesticulations like a man shut up in a sack.
-
-Horace Walpole, protesting, I suppose, against Fielding and Smollett,
-had said that the 'great resources of fancy had been dammed up by a
-strict adherence to common life,' while the older romances were 'all
-imagination and improbability.' He had tried to combine the two in _The
-Castle of Otranto_, a book in which portraits sigh and step down from
-their canvases, dead hermits reappear as skeletons in sackcloth, and
-gigantic ghosts in armour rise to heaven in a clap of thunder. These
-eccentricities were efforts after the strangeness of all true romance,
-and their instant popularity showed how ready people were for mystery
-and ancient tale. Before Scott succeeded in doing what Walpole had
-attempted, in writing a tale that should be strange but sane, ancient
-but real, a crowd of novels, whose most attractive quality was their
-'horridness,' had turned the heads of the young women who read them.
-Miss Thorpe, in _Northanger Abbey_, says:
-
- 'My dearest Catherine, what have you been doing with yourself all
- this morning? Have you gone on with _Udolpho_?'
-
- 'Yes, I have been reading it ever since I woke; and I am got to the
- black veil.'
-
- 'Are you indeed? How delightful! Oh! I would not tell you what is
- behind the black veil for the world! Are not you wild to know?'
-
- 'Oh! yes, quite; what can it be? But do not tell me: I would not
- be told upon any account. I know it must be a skeleton; I am sure
- it is Laurentina's skeleton. Oh! I am delighted with the book! I
- should like to spend my whole life in reading it, I assure you; if
- it had not been to meet you, I would not have come away from it for
- all the world.'
-
- 'Dear creature, how much I am obliged to you; and when you have
- finished _Udolpho_, we will read the Italian together; and I have
- made out a list of ten or twelve more of the same kind for you.'
-
- 'Have you indeed! How glad I am! What are they all?'
-
- 'I will read you their names directly; here they are in my
- pocket-book. _Castle of Wolfenbach_, _Clermont_, _Mysterious
- Warnings_, _Necromancer of the Black Forest_, _Midnight Bell_,
- _Orphan of the Rhine_, and _Horrid Mysteries_. These will last us
- some time.'
-
- 'Yes; pretty well; but are they all horrid? Are you sure they are
- all horrid?'
-
- 'Yes, quite sure, for a particular friend of mine, a Miss Andrews,
- a sweet girl, one of the sweetest creatures in the world, has read
- every one of them. I wish you knew Miss Andrews, you would be
- delighted with her. She is netting herself the sweetest cloak you
- can imagine.'
-
-[Percy, _Ossian_, and Chatterton.]
-
-These things were but the clothes of romantic story-telling, walking
-bodiless about the world, while a poetry old enough to be astonishingly
-new was nurturing the body that was to stretch them for itself.
-Chatterton's ballads, imitations as they were, showed a sudden and
-novel feeling for mediæval colouring. _Ossian_, that book of majestic
-moments, carried imagination out again to stand between the wind and
-the hill. Scott disliked its vagueness, but it helped in preparing his
-world. Percy's _Reliques_, excused by their compiler on the frivolous
-ground of antiquarian interest, brought the rough voice and rude style
-of Sir Philip Sidney's blind beggar ringing across the centuries, and
-in those old tales, whose rhymes clash like sword on targe, Scott found
-the inspiration that Macpherson's disorderly, splendid flood swept down
-on other men.
-
-[Scott's life.]
-
-Scott's life was no patchwork but woven on a single loom. He did not
-turn suddenly in manhood to discover the colour of his life. It had
-been his in babyhood. An old clergyman, a friend of his aunt, protested
-that 'one may as well speak in the mouth of a cannon as where that
-child is,' while Walter Scott, aged three or four, shouted the ballad
-of Hardyknute:--
-
- 'And he has ridden o'er muir and moss,
- O'er hills and mony a glen,
- When he came to a wounded knight
- Making a heavy mane.
- Here maun I lye, here maun I dye,
- By treacherie's false guiles;
- Witless I was that e'er gave faith
- To wicked woman's smiles.'
-
-As he grew older, he was able, like Froissart, to 'inquire of the truth
-of the deeds of war and adventures' that were to be the background
-of much of his work. He knew old Lowland gentlemen who had paid
-blackmail to Rob Roy, was told of the '15 and the '45 by veterans who
-had used their swords on those occasions, and heard of the executions
-after Culloden from one who had seen at Carlisle the rebels' heads
-above the Scottish Gate. The warlike knowledge of his childhood was
-ripened and mellowed for story-telling by the enthusiasms of his
-youth. Riding through the Lowland valleys collecting the border
-minstrelsy, his good nature and pleasant way let him learn in a broad
-acquaintanceship fashion the character of his countrymen. He had not
-Balzac's deep-cutting analytic knowledge of men, but knew them as
-a warm-hearted fellow of themselves. He knew them as one man knows
-another, and not with the passionately speculative knowledge belonging
-to a mind that contemplates them from another world. He did not analyse
-them, but wrote of their doings with an unconscious externality that
-very much simplified their motives and made them fit participators in
-the sportsman-like life of his books.
-
-[Scott and reality.]
-
-Ballads and sagas and the historical reading to which they had given
-their savour; a free open air life, and a broad, humorous understanding
-of men; these were the things that Scott had behind him when Cervantes
-moved him to write narrative, and when the gold that shines through
-the dress of education in the stories of Maria Edgeworth made him
-fall in love with local as well as historical colour, anxious to draw
-his nation as she had drawn hers, and to paint Scottish character in
-prose as Burns had painted it in verse. The historical character of his
-work should not disguise from us its more vital qualities. Hazlitt,
-whose keen eye was not to be put out by the gold and pomp of trappings
-and armour, notices that Scott represents a return to the real. He
-is noticing the most invigorating quality of Romanticism. Scott's
-importance is not his because he wrote historical novels, but because
-his historical novels were humane. He had found out, as Hazlitt says,
-that 'there is no romance like the romance of real life.'
-
-[His technique.]
-
-'As for his technique, there is no need to praise him, who had so many
-other virtues, for that of delicate craftsmanship, which he had not.
-He was not a clever performer, but an honest one whose methods were no
-more elaborate than himself. Dumas describes them in that chapter of
-the _Histoire de mes Bêtes_ in which he discusses his own:--
-
- 'His plan was to be tedious, mortally tedious, often for half a
- volume, sometimes for a volume.
-
- 'But during this volume he posed his characters; during this volume
- he made so minute a description of their physiques, characters, and
- habits; you learnt so well how they dressed, how they walked, how
- they talked, that when, at the beginning of the second volume, one
- of these characters found himself in some danger, you exclaimed to
- yourself:
-
- '"What, that poor gentleman in an applegreen coat, who limped as
- he walked, and lisped as he talked, how is he going to get out of
- that?"
-
- 'And you were very much astonished, after being bored for half a
- volume, a volume, sometimes indeed for a volume and a half; you
- were astonished to find that you were enormously concerned for the
- gentleman who lisped in talking, limped in walking, and had an
- applegreen coat.'
-
-The sensation of reading a Waverley Novel is that of leaning on the
-parapet of a bridge on a summer day, watching the sunlight on a twig
-that lies motionless in a backwater. The day is so calm and the
-sunlight so pleasant that we continue watching the twig for a time
-quite disproportionate to the interest we feel in it, until, when it is
-at last carried into the main current, we follow its swirling progress
-down the stream, and are no more able to take our eyes from it than if
-we were watching the drowning of ourselves.
-
-[Improvisation.]
-
-Scott knew very well the disadvantages of improvisation, of piling
-up his interest and our own together. But he could work in no other
-manner. He said: 'There is one way to give novelty, to depend for
-success on the interest of a well contrived story. But, wo's me! that
-requires thought, consideration--the writing out of a regular plan or
-plot--above all, the adhering to one, which I can never do, for the
-ideas rise as I write, and bear such a disproportioned extent to that
-which each occupied at the first concoction, that (cocksnowns!) I shall
-never be able to take the trouble.' His was a mind entirely different
-from Poe's, or Mérimée's, or Flaubert's, those scrupulous technicians
-with whom was the future of Romanticism, and it was an artistic virtue
-in him to realise the fact, to proceed on his own course, leaving as he
-went large, rough, incomparable things, as impressive as the boulder
-stones of which the country people say that a giant threw them as he
-passed.
-
-[His character and work.]
-
-His swift, confused writing gets its effect because he never asked
-too much from it. He never tried to do anything with it beyond the
-description of his characters and the telling of their story. He
-had no need to catch an atmosphere by subtleties of language. His
-conception of the beings and life of another age did not make them
-different except in externals, from our own. He did not, like Gautier
-or Flaubert, regard the past as a miraculous time in which it was
-possible to be oneself, or in which true feeling was not veiled in
-inexactitudes. Very simple himself, he did not feel in the present
-those laxities of sensation or inexactitudes of expression that made
-the past a place of refuge. He was not dissatisfied with life as he
-found it, and was not disposed to alter it when he dressed it for a
-masquerade. Nor was that difficult for him. His mind was full of the
-stage properties of the past, and, as he walked about, he lived in any
-time he chose and was the same in all of them. He lived with humanity
-rather than in any particular half-century, and did not feel, like
-Peacock, the need of dainty, careful movement in order not to break the
-fabric he was building. _Maid Marian_ is the same story as _Ivanhoe_.
-Scott seems to have stepped straight out of his story to write it,
-Peacock to be looking a long way back, and building very skilfully
-the replica of something he had never seen but in a peculiarly happy
-vision. Scott is quite at home in his tale, and can treat it as rudely
-as he likes. Peacock seems to be playing very warily on the fragile
-keys of a spinet.
-
-Sir Walter's fingers would have broken a spinet. His was no elaborately
-patterned music threaded with the light delicacies of melody. He
-struck big chords and used the loud pedal. His was the art of a Wagner
-rather than that of a Scarlatti. 'The Big Bow-wow strain,' he wrote,
-comparing himself with Jane Austen, 'I can do like any now going; but
-the exquisite touch, which renders ordinary commonplace things and
-characters interesting, from the truth of the description and the
-sentiment, is denied to me.' 'One man can do but one thing. Universal
-pretensions end in nothing.' Scott knew that jewellery-work was not
-for him, and never tried his eyes by peering through the watchmaker's
-glass. He saw life, as a short-sighted man sees a landscape, in its
-essentials. He could spread over it what dress of detail he preferred,
-and chose that which came readiest to his hand, flinging over humanity
-the cloak of his boyish dreams. Humanity was not hampered by it, but
-moves through his pages like a stout wind over a northern moor.
-
-
-
-
-THE ROMANTICISM OF 1830
-
-
-
-
-THE ROMANTICISM OF 1830
-
-
-[The mingling of the arts.]
-
-DUMAS in _La Femme au Collier de Velours_ thus describes Hoffmann's
-room: 'It was the room of a genius at once capricious and picturesque,
-for it had the air of a studio, a music-shop, and a study, all
-together. There was a palette, brushes, and an easel, and on the easel
-the beginnings of a sketch. There was a guitar, a violin, and a piano,
-and on the piano an open sonata. There was pen, ink, and paper, and on
-the paper the first scrawled lines of a ballad. Along the walls were
-bows, arrows, and arbalests of the fifteenth century, sixteenth-century
-drawings, seventeenth-century musical instruments, chests of all
-times, tankards of all shapes, jugs of all kinds, and, lastly, glass
-necklaces, feather fans, stuffed lizards, dried flowers, a whole world
-of things, but a whole world not worth twenty-five silver thalers.'
-
-That account, whether from hearsay, conjecture, or knowledge, I do
-not know, is not only an admirable portrait of the room and brain of
-an arch-romantic, but might serve as a parable of the Romanticism
-of 1830. In that year Hugo's _Hernani_ was produced at the Comédie
-Française, and the young men who battled with the Philistines for its
-success were drawn from the studios as well as from the libraries,
-and had their David in Théophile Gautier. Never before had the arts
-been so inextricably entangled, had antiquarianism been so lively and
-humane, had gems and worthless baubles been so confounded together.
-Chateaubriand had reaffirmed the pictorial rights of literature.
-Delacroix was painting pictures from Byron and from Dante, in bold,
-predominant colours, very different from the lassitudinous livery
-of the schools. There was a new generosity of sentiment responsible
-for Corot's landscapes and Barye's beasts. The sudden widening of
-knowledge and sympathy was expressed in the new broadness and courage
-of technique, and the same forces that covered the palette with vivid
-reds and blues, and compelled the sculptor to a virile handling of his
-chisel, found outlet in words also. Writers, like painters, seized
-the human, coloured, passionate elements in foreign literatures,
-looking everywhere for the liberty and brilliance they desired. The
-open-throated, sinewy, gladiatorial muse of Byron found here devoted
-worshippers, and the spacious movements of Shakespeare, his people
-alive and free, independent of the dramas in which for a few hours
-in the Globe Theatre they had had a part to play, delighted men with
-an outlook very different from, and hostile to, that of Voltaire,
-although he had done his share in making their outlook possible.
-
-[Illustration: VICTOR HUGO]
-
-The studio and the study were very close together. Gautier, Hugo, and
-Mérimée were all painters in their own right, and there is a difference
-between the writers who have only seen life from a library, and those
-who have seen it from behind an easel. The writer who has once felt
-them can never forget the eye-delighting pleasures of the palette,
-but composes in colour-schemes, and feels for the tints of words as
-well as for their melody. The work of the Romantics was visualised
-and coloured in a manner then new. It was almost shocking to men who
-had been accustomed, as it were, to write in the severest monotone,
-and to refuse, if indeed they had ever thought of it, such luxury of
-realisation.
-
-[Local colour.]
-
-There is no need, except for the sake of the argument, to state the
-fact that pictures are called up in a reader's mind by a careful
-selection of details presented in a proper order. It is well known
-that a few details correctly chosen have a more compelling power on
-the imagination than a complete and catalogued description. These men,
-writing pictorially, gave a new responsibility to single touches. It
-became clear that visualisation was impossible unless observation
-preceded it, and details accordingly took upon themselves the exigent
-dignity of local colour. Local colour, from distinguishing between
-places, was brought to mark the difference between times. Archæology
-became suddenly of absorbing interest; its materials were more than
-its materials; they were made the symbols of lives as real and as red
-in the veins as those of the archæologists themselves. Notre Dame was
-no longer to be expressed in a learned antiquarian paper, but in a
-passionate book. And Victor Hugo visualising with the accuracy of a
-poet, found that just as archæology meant little without life, so the
-life was vapid without the archæology. Quasimodo shoves his hideous
-face through a hole in order to be elected king of fools, but Hugo does
-not allow that marvellous grimace to fill the picture. The hole must
-be there as well, and so 'une vitre brisée à la jolie rosace audessus
-de la porte laissa libre un cercle de pierre par lequel il fut convenu
-que les concurrents passeraient la tête.' The setting is as important
-as the head; humanity and its trappings are worthless by themselves,
-and valuable only together. Here is the source of Realism, within
-Romanticism itself. Indeed almost the whole development of the art in
-the nineteenth century is due to this new care for the frame, and to
-this new honesty in dealing with the man within it.
-
-[The youth of the Romantics.]
-
-An energetic simplicity of nature was needed for the fullest enjoyment
-of these new conditions, and the greatest of the French Romantics were
-almost like big interested children in their attitude towards life
-and themselves. As soon as we find a Romantic like Mérimée, reserved,
-subtle, a tender-hearted Machiavellian, we find a man who is to
-dissociate himself from them sooner or later, and to produce something
-different a little from the purely Romantic ideals. There is something
-beautiful and inspiriting in the youth of the Romantics. I like to
-think of Gautier, the olive-skinned boy from the studio in the rue
-St. Louis, overcome with nervousness at the idea of touching the hand
-of Hugo, himself only twenty-seven, sitting down and trembling like
-a girl on the stairs before the master's door. And then the splendid
-prank of Dumas, who, on the eve of revolution, went down into the
-country like one of his own heroes, held up a town, and with a very
-few friends obtained the submission of the governor, and captured an
-arsenal for his party. They were boys, and some hostility was needed
-for their uttermost delight. In England the battles of art are more
-like squabbles, but in the Paris of 1830 it seemed as if the town were
-divided into camps for the defence of classicism and the support of
-the new ideas. It was as if each point of vantage had to be taken by
-storm, and the great night of _Hernani_, when Hugo's supporters had
-red tickets and a password--the Spanish word _hierro_, which means
-'steel'--was the noblest memory in the life of at least one of Hugo's
-enthusiastic lieutenants.
-
-Such a joyous and vigorous thing was the Romanticism of 1830. It
-touched story-telling through Balzac, Hugo, Dumas, Gautier, and
-Mérimée, of whom the first three, in turning from the theatre to the
-art of narrative, found inspiration in Sir Walter Scott. Scott's
-influence has been one of bulk rather than of quality on English
-story-telling. But in France, instead of tracing his progeny in
-insipid copies, we follow it through the bold variations of these
-three powerful and original minds. Through them it returned to England
-again. Balzac, as the most important of the three, in view of the
-later developments of the novel, I have discussed in a separate
-chapter. Gautier's Oriental and Antique inspiration, and Mérimée's
-combination of ascetic narrative with vivid subject, are also themes
-for separate and particular consideration. But Hugo and Dumas are so
-generally representative of the Romantic movement in story-telling,
-that in writing of them in this chapter I feel I am but filling in the
-background already sketched for the others.
-
-[The Preface to _Cromwell_.]
-
-The theatre was, in 1830, the scene of the most decisive battle between
-Romanticism and Classicism. The fight of the painters, of the poets,
-of the story-tellers, seemed concentrated in the more obvious combat
-of the dramatists, whose armies could see their enemies, and even come
-to blows with them. And in Hugo's preface to _Cromwell_, that preface
-which is now so much more interesting than the play that follows
-it, he claims several things for the dramatist that by act if not by
-argument he was later to claim for the artist in narrative. He demands
-that the sublime and ridiculous should be together in literature
-and, as in life, win their force from each other. The drama, and so
-the novel, which also attempts in some sort a reproduction of human
-existence, is not to be written on a single note. It is not to be
-wholly sublime or wholly ridiculous, but both at once. The general in
-his triumphal car is to be genuinely afraid of toppling over. And so,
-in _Les Misérables_, the student's frolic is whole-heartedly described,
-without in any way binding the author to make light of the sorrow of
-Fantine when she finds that her own desertion is the merry surprise
-at the end of it. The sublime will not be the less sublime for being
-mingled with the grotesque, and so, in _Notre Dame de Paris_, the
-deepest passion in the book is felt by a hideous and deformed dwarf,
-and by this same dwarf rather than by any more obvious impersonation
-of justice, the lascivious priest is flung from the tower. Looking up
-in his agony, as he clings to the bending cornice his desperate hands
-have clutched, he does not meet the eyes of some person of a grandeur
-matching the moment, but sees the grotesque face of Quasimodo, utterly
-indifferent to him, looking, like one of the gargoyles, over Paris,
-with tears on his distorted cheeks.
-
-In this same preface, too, Hugo justifies innovations in language,
-very necessary for an art whose new won freedom was to let it explore
-so much that was unknown. When the body changes, he asks, would you
-keep the coat the same? Triumphantly appealing to history, he points
-out that 'the language of Montaigne is no longer that of Rabelais, the
-language of Pascal is no longer that of Montaigne, and the language of
-Montesquieu is no longer that of Pascal.' He is justifying there the
-coloured prose of Chateaubriand, the opulent vocabulary of Gautier, and
-his own infinitely various effects in prose and verse.
-
-[Victor Hugo on Scott.]
-
-He was, until Sainte-Beuve took the work from his hands, at once
-the leader and the defender of Romanticism. And, critic and artist,
-severally and in the combination that we have grown accustomed to
-expect in fulfilment of both these functions, his was too sovereign a
-mind to adopt or borrow anything from another writer without knowing
-very clearly what he intended to do with it. Writing of _Quentin
-Durward_, he said: 'Après le roman pittoresque mais prosaïque de
-Walter Scott il restera un autre roman à créer, plus beau et plus
-complet encore selon nous. C'est le roman, à la fois drame et épopée,
-pittoresque mais poètique, réel mais idéal, vrai mais grand, qui
-enchâssera Walter Scott dans Homère.' That romance is Victor Hugo's
-own. His tremendous books are conceived in the manner of an epic
-poet rather than of a novelist or a romancer. The relations of his
-characters are not solely concerned with themselves but with some
-large principle that animates the book in which they live. If he is
-without Norns or Fates, if he sets his characters against a background
-other than that of Destiny, he substitutes the power of the law or the
-power of the sea, and illumines with a story not only the actors who
-take part in it, but also the spirit of the Gothic or the spirit of
-revolution.
-
-[The Waverley Novels and Hugo's romances.]
-
-To turn from the Waverley Novels to the romances of Hugo, is like
-stepping from the open air into a vast amphitheatre whose enclosed
-immensity is more overwhelming than the clear sky. Scott writes, on a
-plain human level, tales that we can readily believe, chronicles that
-are like private documents, or memoirs such as might have been written
-by the ancestors of our own families. Hugo does not tell his tale from
-the point of view of its actors, but puts them before us in a setting
-far larger than the one they saw. Their petty adventures are but
-threads chosen arbitrarily from a far more intricate design, and they
-themselves but illustrations of some greater motion than any to which
-in their own right they could aspire. There are hundreds of them, and
-with our narrow powers of interest and attention we fasten on one or
-two, like children choosing colours on a race-course, and follow them
-to the end, while Hugo, with his godlike eye, sees them all as threads
-in his pattern, poor, small lives, twisted in accordance with a design
-beyond their comprehension. In Scott's open air we can live and breathe
-and be content, and stand firmly with our feet upon the ground. In
-Hugo's amphitheatre we see an ordered spectacle of life and death, and
-are, as it were, present at the shapings of the ends of man.
-
-[Illustration: ALEXANDRE DUMAS]
-
-[Dumas on Scott.]
-
-There is a much less terrible pleasure to be had from the works of
-Dumas. Behind all Hugo's books is the solemnity, behind Dumas' the joy
-of living, the _joie de vivre_--the French phrase, although identical,
-seems better to express it. To compare Hugo's with Dumas' criticism of
-the Scott novel is to see very clearly the difference in weight and
-depth between the two men. Hugo sees in Scott the promise of another
-and a greater kind of romance. Dumas sees only that it is possible
-to improve on Scott's technique. He notices that Scott spends half
-a volume or so in describing his characters before setting them in
-action, and in his gay way justifies him by saying: 'Il n'y a pas de
-feu sans fumée, il n'y a pas de soleil sans ombre. L'ennui, c'est
-l'ombre; l'ennui c'est la fumée.' Sacrifice fifty pages of _ennui_
-to the gods, and then away with your story. Dumas decides to improve
-on this, to set his characters moving, and to pour his libations of
-_ennui_ on the way. 'Commencer par l'intérêt, au lieu de commencer
- par l'ennui; commencer par l'action, au lieu de commencer par la
-préparation; parler des personnages après les avoir fait paraître, au
-lieu de les faire paraître après avoir parlé d'eux.' This is not very
-sublime, after the suggestion that Hugo won from the same subject; but
-it produced '_Les Trois Mousquetaires_.' D'Artagnan is in a hubbub on
-the first page, and the _ennui_ of description is given us so sparsely
-that, watching for it chapter by chapter, we almost consider ourselves
-swindled when we reach the last and are still without it. 'The purpose
-of this tale is not to describe interiors,' Dumas petulantly ejaculates
-when tired of talking about Cornelius' room in _La Tulipe Noire_. No;
-certainly not; neither of rooms nor of men. Damn psychology, and hey
-for full-blooded adventure. Dumas took a free stage for his duels and
-headlong rides and gallant adventures and ingenious stratagems. His
-men moved too fast not to feel themselves encumbered in a furnished
-room; there was little point in describing a landscape for them,
-since, before it was done, they were several leagues off in another;
-too intricate furniture in their own heads would have cost them
-hesitancies, unguarded stabs, and possible falls from a galloping horse.
-
-[_Les Trois Mousquetaires._]
-
-Dumas' novels are novels of the theatre. His first piece of work was
-an attempt to make a melodrama out of _Ivanhoe_, and his best books
-exhibit the art of Walter Scott modified by the rules of the stage.
-The curtain rises on people moving about. It falls on a climax. The
-action of all its scenes is in crescendo. Alter Scott to fit these
-rules, and you have something like the form that Dumas for more than
-half a century has imposed on non-psychological fiction. How admirably
-he filled it himself. Those splendid fellows of his, whose cavalier way
-fairly takes us off our feet, are not dead puppets made to wield toy
-swords at the pulling of a string. There is something exuberant and
-infectious even in the restraint of Athos. They are all alive, not with
-an independent, almost hostile existence like that of the characters
-of Balzac, but with a vitality they owe to their creator and to us,
-the free coursing blood of boyish dreams. They are the things that at
-one time or another we have set our hearts on being, the things that
-Dumas actually was. Where they ride a jolly spirit goes with them,
-and we know that Dumas had only to settle in a quiet village to turn
-it into a place of gay and prosperous festivity. 'Madeleine,' says
-D'Artagnan at the end of _Vingt Ans Après_, 'give me the room on the
-first floor. I must keep up my dignity now that I am captain of the
-musketeers. But always keep my room on the fifth floor; one never
-knows what may happen.' Is not that just the attitude of Dumas, who
-remarked upon his deathbed, 'I took twenty francs with me to Paris.
-Well, I have kept them. There they are,' and pointed to his last louis
-on the mantelpiece. In the flamboyant youthfulness of Dumas, who died
-a boy at sixty-seven, and called Mazarin 'still young, for he was only
-fifty-six,' is perhaps that characteristic that made Romanticism in
-France so complete and satisfactory a Renaissance. When such men as he
-were writing books the world had won its youth again.
-
-
-
-
-BALZAC
-
-
-
-
-BALZAC
-
-
-[His vitality.]
-
-BALZAC used to tell a story of his father, who, when asked to carve
-a partridge, not knowing how to set about it, rolled up his sleeves,
-gripped his knife and fork, and cut it in four with such energy as to
-cleave the plate at the same time and embed the knife in the table.
-That was the manner of setting about things natural to Balzac himself.
-He was a 'joyous wild boar' of a man, with the build and strength
-of a navvy. He was never ill. Gautier tells us that the habitual
-expression of that powerful face was a kind of Rabelaisian glee. Now a
-man who could write the _Comédie Humaine_ and look aside from it with
-a Rabelaisian glee was perhaps the only kind of man who could have
-attempted such a task without being turned, willy nilly, into a pedant.
-
-[The conception of the _Comédie Humaine_.]
-
-There was a logic, a completeness, in the groundwork of the scheme,
-that would have sterilised the imagination of a man with less exuberant
-vitality. Compare for a moment the _Comédie Humaine_ with the novels of
-Sir Walter Scott. Scott meant to Balzac what Maria Edgeworth had meant
-to himself. He had seen in her an attempt to paint Irish country and
-character, and had decided to do the same for Scotland. Balzac after
-those ten years of bad mediæval stories, those ten years of labour for
-the Rachel of his own soul, saw in him an attempt to paint Scottish
-country and character, and decided to do the same for France. But,
-whereas Scott had been brought up on the _Reliques of English Poetry_,
-and in the country of purple heather, grey rock, and leaping stream,
-Balzac was nourished on philosophy and science, and spent his youth in
-a Paris lodging. Scott saw men rather than kinds of man. Bailie Nicol
-Jarvie is more Nicol Jarvie than Bailie. Balzac comes at life in a
-much more scientific spirit. 'Does not Society make of man,' he asks,
-as Chaucer has unconsciously asked before him, 'as many different men
-as there are varieties in zoology? The differences between a soldier,
-a labourer, an administrator, an idler, a savant, a statesman, a
-merchant, a sailor, a poet, a pauper, a priest, are, though more
-difficult to seize, as considerable as those that distinguish the wolf,
-the lion, the ass, the crow, the shark, the sea-calf, the goat, etc.'
-Balzac made up his mind to collect specimens of the social species,
-not pressed and dried, like the old 'Characters' of the seventeenth
-century, but exhibited alive and in their natural surroundings. He was
-to make a world with the colour of contemporary France, an 'august lie,
-true in its details,' a world complete in itself, a world in which
-all the characters were to show the impress of that state of life to
-which it should please Balzac to call them. That was the idea that
-turned the Waverley Novels into the _Comédie Humaine_, that the idea
-whose exposition by a less full-blooded professor would have been so
-readily precise, so readily dull in its precision.
-
-[Illustration: HONORÉ DE BALZAC]
-
-[Physical energy and the task of writing.]
-
-Now there are few harder tasks for a man of overflowing physical energy
-than this, of covering innumerable sheets of paper with wriggling
-unnatural lines traced with the end of a pen. It is likely to become
-a torment; the feet cross and uncross, the fingers itch, the inkpot
-flies across the room, and the energy defeats itself. There is the
-legend of Scott's hand, covering sheet after sheet so swiftly and
-with such regularity that it was painful to watch it; but Scott's was
-not the bomb-like brute energy of Balzac. Balzac, to give life to
-his scientific ideas, needed a more fiery vitality than Scott's, who
-began and ended with merely human notions. The actual writing of his
-books was proportionately more difficult for him. There was no mere
-eccentricity in his habit of getting the sketches for his books set up
-in type, and enlarging them from proofs in the middle of large sheets
-of paper, covering the vast margins with the additions that were to
-make the books themselves. It was a wise attempt to give himself the
-same physical outlet as that enjoyed by the painter or sculptor, to
-give himself something to pull about, something actual, something that
-could be attacked, anything rather than the terrible silkworm spinning
-of a single endless fibre. His energy would have been wasted in a
-hundred ways unless, so far as was possible, he had fitted his work
-to himself and himself to his work. Giant of concentration as he was,
-he added cubits to his stature by taking thought. He made his writing
-hours different from every one else's, wore a white frock something
-like a monk's habit, and found in the drinking of enormous quantities
-of coffee a stimulant as much theatrical as medicinal. These things
-meant much to him, and his use of them was an action similar to that
-of Poe's schoolboy, who, when guessing odd or even the marbles in his
-playmate's hand, would imitate the expression of his adversary's face
-and see what thoughts arose in his mind. The paraphernalia of work were
-likely to induce the proper spirit. When all his fellow Parisians were
-in bed, Balzac, gathering the voluminous white folds about his sturdy
-person, and glancing at the coffee stewing on the fire, sat down to his
-writing-table with the conviction of an alderman sitting down to a city
-dinner. There could never be a doubt in his mind as to the purpose for
-which he was there.
-
-[Balzac's prose.]
-
-This navvy-work of production had its influence on the character of
-his writing. But it was never in Balzac's nature to have understood
-Gautier's craftsman's delight in the polishing and chasing of
-diminutive things. Balzac, the working machine, was simply enormous
-energy so coaxed and trained as to produce an enormous output. The raw
-material of his rich humanity passed through violent processes. It had
-but small chance of any very delicate finish. Balzac thought in books
-and in cycles of books, never in pages, paragraphs, or sentences.
-Although he was much preoccupied with 'style,' envying the men whose
-writing would be charming to the ear even if it meant nothing to the
-mind, the best of his own prose is unbeautiful, rugged, fiercely
-energetic, peculiarly his own, and therefore not to be grumbled at.
-He would have liked to write finely, just as he would have liked _la
-vie splendide_. But his mind, delivering pickaxe blows, or furiously
-wrestling with great masses of material, could not clothe itself in
-stately periods. Always, out of any splendour that he made for it,
-shows a brown, brawny arm, and the splendour becomes an impertinence.
-He had ideas on art, as he had ideas on science, but his was too large
-a humanity to allow itself to be subordinate to either. He was too
-full-blooded a man to be withered by a theory. He was too eager to say
-what he had in his mouth to be patient in the modulation of his voice.
-He was almost too much of a man to be an artist. To think of that man
-fashioning small, perfect poems, who avowed that he wrote his _Contes
-Drôlatiques_ because he happened to notice the fall in the French birth
-rate, is to think of a Colossus tinkering at the mechanism of a watch.
-
-[His proximity to life.]
-
-Then, too, he had been too close to life to think of art for art's
-sake. During the years that followed his setting up author in a garret,
-he had watched the existence of those who are so near starvation that
-they seem to make a living by sweeping the doorstep of Death. And,
-at the same time that, walking out in the evenings, and following a
-workman and his wife on their way home, he had been able to feel their
-rags upon his back, and to walk with their broken shoes upon his feet,
-he had also had his glimpses of _la vie splendide_, the more vivid, no
-doubt, for their contrast with the sober realities he knew. To this
-man, however great a writer he might become, life would always mean
-more than books. It always did. He could cut short other people's
-lamentations by saying, 'Well, but let us talk of real things; let us
-talk of Eugénie Grandet,' but Eugénie Grandet, the miser's daughter,
-interested him much more than the mere novel of that name. His people
-never existed for the sake of his books, but always his books for the
-sake of his people. He makes a story one-legged or humpbacked without
-scruple, so long as by doing so he can make his reader see a man and
-his circumstances exactly as they appeared to himself. He was not like
-a pure artist, an instrument on which life played, producing beautiful
-things. His concern with life was always positive. His world was not
-a world of dream and patterned imagery, but, according to his mood,
-was an elaborate piece of mechanism and he an impassioned mechanician,
-or a zoological garden and he an impassioned zoologist. It is almost
-matter for wonder that such a man should choose to express himself in
-narrative.
-
-[His conception of the novel.]
-
-And yet the novel, as he conceived it, gave him the best of
-opportunities for putting his results before the world. If we allow
-ourselves to set all our attention on politics and finance and social
-theory, we lose in life all but the smell of blue-books, and the grey
-colour of Stock Exchange returns. If Balzac had written science, and
-not stories, we should have only had the ideas of his novels without
-that passionate presentment of concrete things that gives those ideas
-their vitality. Indeed, the novels are far greater than the ideas, just
-as the poetic, seeing man in Balzac was greater than the scientist.
-Weariless in distinguishing man from man, type from type, specimen
-from specimen, by the slightest indication of the clay, he was able
-in novels, as he could never have done in works of science, to give
-the colour of each man's life expressed in his actions, in his talk,
-in his choice of clothes, in the furniture of his room. The action of
-all novels, like that of all plays, is performed in the brain of the
-reader or spectator. The novelist's and dramatist's characters are
-like pieces on a chessboard, symbols of possibilities not obviously
-expressed. In older fiction these possibilities were left so vague
-that the reader could adopt any part he chose, without in the least
-interfering with the story, independent as that was of personal
-character. Never before Balzac made them had the chessmen assumed so
-much of human detail. In his books they are no longer pegs of wood,
-depending for their meanings on the reader's generosity, for their
-adventures on the ingenuity of the author. They make their moves in
-their own rights. The hero of a Balzac novel is not the reader, in
-borrowed clothes, undergoing a series of quite arbitrary experiences.
-He cannot be made to do what the author requires, but fills his own
-suits, and has a private life. Balzac knows and makes his reader feel
-that his characters have not leapt ready-made into the world to eat
-and drink through a couple of hundred pages and vanish whence they
-came. They have left their mark on things, and things have left their
-mark on them. They have lived in pages where he has not seen them, and
-Balzac never drags them to take a part in existences to which they do
-not belong. I can remember no case where Balzac uses a stock scene, a
-room, or a garden, or a valley that would do for anything. There was
-only one room, one valley, one garden, where the characters could
-have said those words, lost that money, or kissed those kisses, and
-Balzac's stupendous energy is equal not only to pouring life into his
-people, but also to forcing the particular scene upon his canvas with
-such vivid strokes that every cobble seems to have a heart, and every
-flower in a pot to sway its blossoms with the sun. Even in the short
-stories, where he often follows gods that are not his own, writing of
-madness like a Hoffmann, and of intrigue like a Boccaccio, his peculiar
-genius is apparent in the environments. How carefully, in _La Messe
-de l'Athée_, he works out the conditions of life that made the story
-possible for its actors. And, in the longer novels, there is scarcely
-a sentence unweighted with evidence that is of real import to him who
-would truly understand the characters and happenings of the book. How
-much does not the story of _Eugénie Grandet_ owe to that description of
-the little money-getting, vine-growing town of Saumur, with its cobbled
-streets, its old houses, its greedy faces watching the weather from the
-house doors, the only proper setting for the narrow power of Goodman
-Grandet, and the leaden monotony of his daughter's life?
-
-[Balzac's world and that of Realism.]
-
-Balzac's fierce determination that his lies should be true in their
-details has often been remarked in claiming him as the first of the
-French realists. And, indeed, others of his characteristics, his
-interest in life as it is, the scientific bias that found its parody
-in Zola, his fearlessness in choice of subject, his entire freedom
-from classical ideals, are certainly attributes of realism. Realism
-is ready, like Balzac, to deal with stock exchanges and bakeries and
-all the side shops of civilisation; realism finds Greek Greek and not
-an Elixir of Life; realism tries to see life as it is. But realism
-(an impossible ideal) needs for its approximate attainment a man of
-ordinary energy; and this Balzac was not. Balzac used Thor's hammer,
-not one from the carpenter's shop. He lived like ten men and so do his
-characters. A crossing-sweeper in a story by Balzac would wear out
-his broom in half an hour, but the broom of a crossing-sweeper of de
-Maupassant or Flaubert would be certain of an average life. Balzac's
-world is not the world of realism, because it goes too fast, like a
-clock without a pendulum, running at full speed. His world is more
-alive than ours, and so are his men. They are demons, men carried to
-the _n_th power. Fire runs in their veins instead of blood, and we
-watch them with something like terror, as if we were peeping into hell.
-They are superhuman like Balzac himself, and have become a kind of
-lesser divinities. None but he would have dared 'to frame their fearful
-symmetry.' None but they could so well have illustrated existence as
-Balzac saw it.
-
-[A new motive in fiction.]
-
-And life, as this Rabelaisian Frenchman saw it, in the chaotic years of
-the nineteenth century, was a terrible thing except to the blind and
-the numbed, and to those who, like himself, possessed 'unconquerable
-souls.' He found two primary motives in existence. Passion and the
-production of children was one. He said that this was the only one.
-But his life and his work made it clear that there was another, and
-that this other was money. Money, the need of it, the spending of
-it, fantastic but always acute plans for getting hold of it, like
-that suggested in _Facino Cane_, filled his own life, and were not
-banished even from his love-letters. His own obsession by debts and
-business forced on him as a novelist a new way of looking at life,
-and, through him, gave another outlook to story-telling. In the older
-novels, Fielding's for example, rich were rich, and poor were poor,
-and only to be changed from one to the other by some calamity or fairy
-godmother of a coincidence. People were static; unless they turned
-out to be Somebody's illegitimate son or rightful heir, their clothes
-were not of a finer cut as they grew older, and if they ate off wooden
-platters in the first chapter, they supped no more daintily in the
-last. In romantic tales and fairy stories, a hero might cut his way
-to fortune through dragons or piratical Turks; in the rogue novels he
-might swindle a dinner, and after long switchbacking between twopence
-and nothing, happen by accident upon a competence; he never, before
-Balzac took him in hand, went grimly at life, closing his heart,
-concentrating his energies, compelling even love to help him in his
-steady climb from poverty to opulence. He left that to the villain,
-and the story-teller took care that the villain eventually got his
-deserts. The older novelists were vastly interested in the progress
-of a love-affair; Balzac looks kindly at that, but his real interest
-is in the progress of a financial superman. The wealth and poverty
-of Balzac's characters is the quality that makes or breaks them. The
-mainspring of their actions is the desire of getting on in life. What
-is the tragedy of Eugénie Grandet, but money? What is the tragedy of
-Père Goriot, but money? Eliminate wealth and poverty from either of
-them and they cease to exist. If old Goriot had been rich and indulgent
-to his daughters he would have been an estimable father; but he is
-poor; his daughters must be luxurious, and so he is Père Goriot.
-The story is that of Lear and his kingdom, translated into hundred
-franc notes and lacking the Cordelia. Love, Wisdom, Gentleness are
-inconsequent dreamers in a house of Mammon. They talk in window corners
-and behind curtains, ashamed of their disinterestedness. They are like
-the old gods banished from the temples, whispering in secret places in
-the woods, and going abroad quietly in the twilight, while in the glare
-of noon the clanking brazen giant strides heavily across the world.
-
- 'And underneath his feet, all scattered lay
- Dead skulls and bones of men, whose life had gone astray.'
-
-
-
-
-GAUTIER AND THE EAST
-
-
-
-
-GAUTIER AND THE EAST
-
-
-[The East as a means of expression.]
-
-THE East is an invention of the nineteenth century. We have only
-to look at the works of Voltaire or of Goldsmith to see that the
-Orient did not exist before the time of the Romantic movement. To
-early writers it meant nothing but polygamy, moguls, elephants, and
-'bonzes,' and the eighteenth-century translation of the _Arabian
-Nights_ did little more than supply an entertaining form to an ironical
-philosopher. Even when it became the fashion to make imaginary
-Orientals expose the follies of the West, the East had not yet become
-alive for us. We find scarcely a hint in the hundred and twenty letters
-of _The Citizen of the World_ that it meant more than a dialectical
-expression for topsy-turvydom, a place to which you could refer as
-to Lilliput or to Brobdingnag, useful like the _x_ of algebra in
-illustrating the properties of other things. The first glimmerings of
-discovery are in Beckford's _Vathek_, an extravagant book, belittled
-by a schoolboyish humour--as when the Caliph plays football with the
-rotund figure of the Indian Magician--but written by a man to whom the
-East did really mean some sort of gorgeous dream.
-
-For the East is not an expression of philosophy, or of geography, but
-of temperament; it is a dream that has led many to leave their people
-for its people, their homes for desert tents, in the effort to turn its
-conventions into realities of life. Men have fallen in love with it, as
-they have fallen in love with statues or with the beautiful women of
-pictures. It means more than itself, like a man whom time has lifted
-into Godhead. It has been given the compelling power of a religion. I
-believe it was an invention made possible by the discovery of local
-colour. With the emphasis of local colour came an emphasised difference
-in places. Minds only mildly preferring one place to another when both
-were vague, most vigorously preferred one or other place when both were
-realised in vivid detail, and could be readily compared. Fastidious
-minds seeking the stage-properties of expression could choose them in
-the booths of all the world. Men who did not care for the settings of
-their own lives were able to fill out their dim Arcadias with detail,
-and vein their phantom goddesses with blood.
-
-The East, when Gautier was growing up in the rich tastes of the
-Romantic movement, was ready to supply the most delicious conventions.
-Goethe had shown its possibilities. It was there like a many-coloured
-curtain behind which he could build a world less entangled, less
-unmanageable than his own. Its newness must not be forgotten in
-considering his use of it, and in thinking of his use of Antiquity we
-must remember that it was as novel as the East.
-
-[The Antique.]
-
-Now the Antique was one of the cudgels with which the Classicists tried
-to beat the heads of the Romanticists in the battles of that time. It
-did not mean to Gautier what it meant to them. Its metamorphosis was
-simultaneous with the birth of the East, and had almost the same cause.
-Insisting on local colour in places, the Romanticists insisted also on
-local colour in humanity. Cromwell was to be allowed to say that he
-had the parliament in his bag and the king in his pocket. Cæsar was to
-be allowed to talk like a man and even to be one. So that for Gautier
-Antiquity meant not a cold inhumanity that had been beautiful, but a
-warm, full-blooded life that worshipped simple, energetic gods, and
-found expression in a thousand ways other than the speech of blank
-verse and heroic actions that had been so often represented in pictures
-of an annoying timidity of colouring. The East and the Antique together
-had been touched as if by magic, and turned from the abstract into the
-concrete, from the heroic into the human, and so into the very material
-for personal expression.
-
-[The East and Arcadia.]
-
-Gautier's attitude towards the East is not unlike that of the
-Elizabethans towards Arcadia. Sir Philip Sidney, courtier, soldier,
-and busy statesman, wrote in terms of shepherds, shepherdesses, and
-shipwrecked princes, and worked in an ideal atmosphere where no cares
-were greater than love, or a thorn in a lamb's foot. He, with
-
- 'A sweet attractive kinde of grace
- A full assurance given by lookes,
- Continual comfort in a face,
- The lineaments of gospel bookes,'
-
-seemed to belong to that Golden Age which has never been now, but
-always long ago. And Gautier, busy writer of articles and travel-books,
-massive and vividly alive, could not persuade himself to be Parisian
-and contemporary. Nor would it be extravagant to compare him with the
-pastoral writers of to-day, Celtic and Gaelic, who like him lift their
-emotions into a simpler, more congenial atmosphere, and like him insist
-continually on the local colour of their dreams. These writers, sitting
-in London or in Edinburgh, hear, without moving from their comfortable
-chairs, the cry of the curlew on the moor, and are transported to a
-quiet bay, half enclosed by cliffs, 'in two white curves, like the
-wings of the solander when she hollows them as she breasts the north
-wind,' and under the spells of an intenser imagined life find their
-own emotions more vivid and more easily expressed. Gautier, sitting in
-Paris, sees the swallows fluttering about the roofs and flying south in
-autumn.
-
- 'Je comprends tout ce qu'elles disent,
- Car le poète est un oiseau;
- Mais captif ses élans se brisent
- Contre un invisible réseau!
-
- Des ailes! des ailes! des ailes!
- Comme dans le chant de Ruckert,
- Pour voler, là-bas avec elles
- Au soleil d'or, au printemps vert!'
-
-That cry for wings is the keynote of his most passionately beautiful
-work. When he is at his best; when he is not projecting young men with
-a mathematical freedom of morals into a Western society; in those
-moments when he is most himself, we hear clipped feathers beat against
-the bars. He sought to escape from Paris to the Enchanted Islands, and
-from the nineteenth century to the Golden Age. The Enchanted Islands
-he had identified with the East, and the Golden Age was the time of
-the Pharaohs or of the making of the Venus. As the Christian fingers
-his crucifix and is able to kneel upon the footsteps of the throne,
-so Gautier found talismans to help his dreams to their desires. A
-mummy's foot, a marble hand took him to the times he loved, or half
-revealed the perfections that reality refused. A curiosity shop was a
-postern-gate to heaven, and a merchant of antiquities held St. Peter's
-keys.
-
-[The story-telling of dreams.]
-
-His art is that of making his dreams come true. He is not an observer
-of life, like Richardson, Fielding, or De Maupassant. He does not copy
-the surface of contemporary existence; but cuts away all but passion,
-and clothes that in symbols whose strangeness disentangled it and
-helped him to make it real. Beautiful women step down to him from their
-tapestries, and, living on drops of his blood, come back to him out of
-their graves. The Princess Hermonthis claims her little foot that he
-has bought as a paper-weight, and takes him to the tomb of the Pharaohs
-and the pre-adamite kings sitting with their thousand peoples waiting
-for the final day. The Pompeian harlot is brought alive by the love of
-a youth for the imprint her perfect breasts have left in molten lava.
-He is ill at ease in his most famous _Roman de la Momie_ until he has
-finished with the Englishman and the doctor, and is translating the
-scroll of papyrus buried three thousand years ago with Tahoser in the
-sarcophagus.
-
-[Illustration: THÉOPHILE GAUTIER]
-
-[Gautier the man.]
-
-But it is too easy to construct a man out of his work. It is more
-interesting to compare the man of this world with the man he would
-have liked to be, and the man he chose to express. Gautier was not
-pure dreamer. Though the world of his art was as far from the world of
-Paris, as the world of Mr. Yeats from the world of London or Dublin,
-he was not a seer, or a poet between whom and reality hung a veil of
-dreams. He was a solid man, one of whose proudest memories was a blow
-that registered five hundred and thirty-two pounds on an automatic
-instrument, the result of daily washing down five pounds of gory
-mutton with three bottles of red Bordeaux. He was a Porthos, and the
-Gautier of his stories, that gorgeous barbaric figure, was his boast,
-cherished as Porthos cherished his dignity. The traits he loved in
-himself were those that gave colour to his fiction. His olive skin, his
-strength, his vitality, his scorn of the religion of sacrifice--these
-were the details he caressed. He was never tired of insisting on
-everything that helped in this Oriental and Antique projection of
-himself. His hero in _Mademoiselle de Maupin_ exclaims: 'I am a man of
-the Homeric times; the world where I live does not belong to me, and
-I do not understand the society about me. Christ has not yet come for
-me; I am as pagan as Alcibiades and Phidias.... I find the earth as
-beautiful as heaven, and I think that perfection of form is virtue.
-I love a statue better than a phantom, and full noon better than
-twilight. Three things please me: gold, marble and purple, splendour,
-solidity, colour.' When a reviewer described him as a being, 'fat,
-jovial, and sanguinary,' he quotes the description with gratitude, and
-explains gleefully that it refers to his taste for bull-fights. He
-begins a book: 'People have often caricatured us, dressed like a Turk,
-cross-legged on cushions.... The caricature is only an exaggeration
-of the truth.' That was how he liked to think of himself, and how he
-would like to be imagined. It is interesting to know that he was a
-kindly bear of a man, who was always called by his Christian name, and
-delighted in astonishing his friends with outbursts of genius served up
-in a joyous obscenity.
-
-He was not a man of wealth as his work suggests; but an extremely
-industrious journalist. Like Balzac, he was proud of his prodigious
-activity. He confesses that he wrote about three hundred volumes: but
-that is the estimate of Porthos; his biographer puts the number at
-sixty. From his twenty-fifth year he was an artist on a treadmill, and
-only at every hundredth, or two hundredth, or three hundredth turn of
-the wheel could he escape for a little and try to satisfy himself. That
-is why his poems and shorter stories are the most perfect specimens of
-his later work. He needed things that could be roughed out in a sitting
-and carried about without risk until the time when he could work on
-them again. He was able to hurry out of sight his dozen sheets for the
-_Presse_ or the _Figaro_, sit down on his cushions, let his fingers run
-through the long hair of a Persian cat, and turn over again and again
-one of the minute Enamels or Cameos of his poetry. In so small a space
-he could afford to be fastidious. He could take up the little thing
-a week later, and a month after that, and file and polish it to his
-content. It was the same with the stories. The story-telling Gautier
-was a Gautier on holiday.
-
-He was a complete man, and could, in active life, have twisted the
-present if he had chosen. But he did not choose. As for politics,
-'what does it matter whether one is ruled by a sabre, a sprinkler of
-holy-water, or an umbrella?' He has been censured for this, but the
-censure means no more than to say he was a perfect artist unfortunately
-not interested in local government. One does not ask a shoemaker if his
-soles and uppers are Socialist or only gentle Liberal. As for his own
-life, he worked hard, brought up his children, but found his emotions
-too intricate to please him. He had to separate them, and translate
-them into terms of another time and place. Modernity rattled past him,
-like the chariots of the king past the potter, who would not look up
-from his wheel lest an ugly curve should throw awry the vessel he was
-shaping. Gautier did his duty by this world and left it, discovering
-for others what Baudelaire called 'the consolation of the arts,' and
-finding peace himself in the less encumbered simplicity of his Ancient
-and Oriental Arcadia.
-
-[The flowers of the white narcissus.]
-
-His work was the construction of a paradise for himself in which other
-people are allowed to walk. His stories are a substitute for opium
-and haschisch, and take us into a world like that of old romance and
-myth, where we meet our own souls walking in strange clothes. 'Art,'
-says Santayana, 'so long as it needs to be a dream, will never cease
-to be a disappointment.' We leave a volume of Gautier as we leave the
-_Mabinogion_, or the _Morte Darthur_, or the _Volsunga Saga_, or a
-book of fairy-tales. We have to readjust ourselves before meeting the
-difficulties of life. But opposite Santayana's sentence we may set one
-from Mahomet. 'If any man have two loaves, let him sell one, and buy
-flowers of the white narcissus; for the one is food for the body and
-the other is food for the soul.' And perhaps this art, where the world
-is simplified into the conventions of a tapestry, by its intense appeal
-to primitive emotions, may help us like a touchstone to distinguish
-between the things to which more than lip-service is slavery, and the
-things to which less than life-service is death.
-
-
-
-
-POE AND THE NEW TECHNIQUE
-
-
-
-
-POE AND THE NEW TECHNIQUE
-
-
-[Self-conscious method.]
-
-'IT is the curse,' says Poe, 'of a certain order of mind that it can
-never rest satisfied with the consciousness of its ability to do a
-thing. Not even is it content with doing it. It must both know and
-show how it was done.' It is all very well to call it a curse; it is
-the curse that gave us Leonardo's notebooks, Reynolds' Discourses,
-and Stevenson's few essays on the art of writing; the curse that is
-among the reasons of Leonardo's excellence, Reynolds' excellence,
-Stevenson's excellence, and the excellence of Poe himself. It is the
-curse that is the secret of all real knowledge of technique. The man
-who is as interested in the way of doing a thing as in the thing when
-done, is the man who is likely to put a new tool in the hands of his
-fellow-craftsmen.
-
-Poe's methods were such a delight to him that his works have an uncanny
-atmosphere about them, as if he had not written them but had been
-present, passionately observant and critical, while they were being
-written by somebody else. More than once he used his pen to make a
-new thing out of a discussion of an old one, and on these occasions
-he dissects his own motives in so impersonal a manner that it is
-difficult for the reader to remember that the author examining is in
-any way connected with the author undergoing examination. _The Raven_,
-for example, a profound piece of technique, is scarcely as profound,
-and certainly not as surprising, as _The Philosophy of Composition_,
-in which its construction is minutely analysed, and Poe callously
-explains, as a matter of scientific rather than personal interest, that
-the whole poem was built on the refrain 'Nevermore,' and that this
-particular refrain was chosen on account of the sonority and ease of
-_o_ and _r_ sounded together. It was inevitable that such a man busying
-himself with story-telling should bring something new into the art.
-
-[Illustration: WILLIAM GODWIN]
-
-[William Godwin and _Caleb Williams_.]
-
-Another story-teller, who, like Poe, was a philosopher and deeply
-interested in technique, had existed before, and from him Poe had that
-strengthening of his ideas that is given by outside confirmation. He
-refers often to William Godwin, the author of _An Enquiry concerning
-Political Justice_ and of several novels, among them one now most
-undeservedly half forgotten, called _Caleb Williams_. It is seldom
-possible to point to any one book as the sign-post of a literary
-cross-roads, but there can be no doubt that in _Caleb Williams_ we see
-the beginnings of self-conscious construction in story-telling. Of that
-book Hazlitt wrote: 'No one ever began _Caleb Williams_ that did not
-read it through: no one that ever read it could possibly forget it,
-or speak of it after any length of time but with an impression as if
-the events and feelings had been personal to himself.' And the author
-not only had done this, but had known how it was done. It is usual to
-say that Poe himself was the first to choose an effect and then plan a
-story to produce it. But _Caleb Williams_ was published in 1794, and in
-a preface to one of the later editions Godwin gave his methods away. On
-him also lay that fruitful curse. He wrote: 'I formed a conception of a
-book of fictitious adventure that should in some way be distinguished
-by a very powerful interest. Pursuing this idea, I invented first the
-third volume of my tale, then the second, and last of all the first.'
-
-Godwin perhaps did not realise how revolutionary was his attitude,
-and even Hazlitt, delighted as he was by their results, does not
-seem to have noticed the novelty of his methods. But Poe, finding
-Godwin's ideas of the very temper of his own, developed them logically
-as far as they would go, and in two paragraphs that I am going to
-quote, expressed in a final manner the principles of self-conscious
-construction.
-
-[The architecture of narrative.]
-
-The first is taken from an essay on Hawthorne:
-
- 'A skilful literary artist has constructed a tale. If wise, he
- has not fashioned his thoughts to accommodate his incidents; but,
- having conceived, with deliberate care, a certain unique or single
- effect to be worked out, he then invents such incidents--he then
- contrives such events as may best aid him in establishing this
- preconceived effect. If his very initial sentence tend not to the
- outbringing of the effect, then he has failed in his first step.
- In the whole composition there should be no word written, of which
- the tendency, direct or indirect, is not to the one pre-established
- design. And by such means, with such care and skill, a picture is
- at length painted which leaves in the mind of him who contemplates
- it with a kindred art a sense of the fullest satisfaction. The idea
- of the tale has been presented unblemished, because undisturbed.'
- ...
-
-The second is more personal, and from _The Philosophy of Composition_:
-
- 'I prefer commencing with the consideration of an _effect_....
- Keeping originality always in view, I say to myself, in the first
- place, "Of the innumerable effects or impressions of which the
- heart, the intellect, or (more generally) the soul is susceptible,
- what one shall I, on the present occasion, select?" Having chosen
- a novel first, and secondly a vivid effect, I consider whether it
- can be best wrought out by incident or tone--whether by ordinary
- incidents and peculiar tone, or the converse, or by peculiarity
- both of incident and tone--afterwards looking about me (or rather
- within) for such combination of event and tone as shall best aid me
- in the construction of the effect.'
-
-[_The Masque of the Red Death._]
-
-Here, of course, he is exaggerating actual fact to make his meaning
-more clear; but I am sure that even the exaggeration is deliberate.
-If he did not literally work in that way he certainly worked in that
-spirit. A writer of Poe's fertility of imagination would be at least
-biassed in choosing his effect by consideration of material already in
-his head. But, the effect once chosen, he left nothing to chance. He
-would never, like the older story-tellers, allow himself to be carried
-away by a wave of his own emotion. He stands beside de Maupassant and
-the conscious artists of the latter half of the nineteenth century. His
-emotional material is never emptied carelessly in front of the reader.
-Chosen scraps of it are laid before him, one by one, in a chosen order,
-producing a more powerful effect than the unrestrained discharge of the
-whole. The first sentences of one of his stories prepare its readers
-for the atmosphere demanded by its conclusion. In _The Masque of the
-Red Death_, for example, revolting horror is the emotion on which he
-built. So, from the terrible opening lines, 'The Red Death had long
-devastated the country. No pestilence had ever been so fatal and so
-hideous. Blood was its Avatar and seal--the redness and the horror of
-blood. There were sharp pains and sudden dizziness, and then profuse
-bleeding at the pores, with dissolution ...' to the end, 'And now was
-acknowledged the presence of the Red Death. He had come like a thief in
-the night. And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed
-hall of their revel, and died, each in the despairing posture of his
-fall. And the life of the ebony clock went out with that of the last
-of the gay. And the flames of the tripods expired. And Darkness and
-Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all,' we are led
-on through consciously created disquietude and terror. How menacing
-is the sentence that immediately follows the prelude: 'But the Prince
-Prospero was happy and dauntless and sagacious.' We feel at once that
-the shadow of death is at his elbow.
-
-[The detective stories.]
-
-Perhaps Poe's technique is more easily examined in those of his tales
-in which the same faculties that planned the construction supplied also
-the motive. The three great detective stories, _The Purloined Letter_,
-_The Murders in the Rue Morgue_, and _The Mystery of Marie Roget_,
-are made of reasoning and built on curiosity, the very mainspring
-of analysis. It is a profitable delight to take any one of these
-stories, and, working backwards from the end to the beginning, to
-follow the mind of the architect. Each of the tales states a difficulty
-and secretes an explanation that is gradually to be reached by the
-reader, who identifies the processes of his own mind with those of
-the analytical Dupin. Starting always with the solution, we can watch
-Poe refusing the slightest irrelevance, and at the same time artfully
-piling up detail upon detail in exactly that order best calculated to
-keep the secret, to heighten the curiosity, to disturb the peace of the
-reader's mind, and to hold him in conjectural suspense until the end.
-
-[Poe's mind.]
-
-But it is easy, in considering the technique of Poe's stories, his
-smiling refusal of 'inspiration,' his confident mastery over his
-material, to let the brilliance of his analytical powers hide from
-us his intimacy with the beautiful, the richness and vividness of
-his imagination, and, particularly, the passionate character of his
-mind. Like Leonardo da Vinci, he was a man whose works were the result
-of the energetic fusing of an emotional personality into moulds
-designed by reason. Not all Leonardo's theories and calculations
-would have sufficed to make a _Mona Lisa_. And if Poe had been merely
-a skilled technician, like so many of his imitators, we should have
-had from him only unbeautiful toys no less valueless than theirs. All
-Poe's work depends, like all Leonardo's, on his power of retaining
-the poetry, the energy of his material, after submitting it to his
-constructive science, and then, when the moulds have been made, of
-pouring it into them red-hot and fluid, as if in the primal vitality
-of its conception. In those very detective stories, that seem built by
-and of the coldest-blooded reason, what is it that makes them great
-but Poe's absorbing passion for the manner of mind of their leading
-character. Dupin is not a mere detective. He is not an analyst, but
-analysis. He is the embodiment of the logical spirit in mankind, just
-as Nicolete, in the old French tale, is the embodiment of the loving
-spirit in womankind. It is for this reason that some have accused Dupin
-and Nicolete of a lack of individuality. They are not individual, but
-universal.
-
-If we would understand the matter as well as the manner of his
-stories, we must think of him as two men, and remember that the
-same sensibility that served the man of anagrams, and ciphers, and
-detective puzzles, served also the worshipper of beauty, and made him
-tremble like a lover at the faintest whisper of her name. Delicately
-balanced, alike as analyst and æsthete, he was moved profoundly by
-the smallest circumstance. Just as a glass of wine was sufficient to
-overturn his reason, so the least wind of suggestion stirred his brain
-in a deep and surprising manner. Nothing that happened to him touched
-him only on the surface. Everything dropped to the depths of him, and
-sometimes returned enriched and recreated. Ideas that others would have
-passed over became for him and for his readers powerful, haunting and
-inevitable. Ideas of mesmerism, of hypnotism, and of madness, that have
-been for so many lesser artists only the materials for foolishness,
-were pregnant for him with wonderful effects and stories that, once
-read, can never be forgotten. In _William Wilson_ he is using less
-flippantly than Stevenson the idea of dual personality. In _The Oval
-Portrait_, where a painter transfers the very soul of his lady to his
-canvas, and, as the portrait seems to breathe alive, turns round to
-find her dead, he is using the subtle, half-thought things that an
-earlier writer would scarcely have felt, or, if he had, would have
-brushed, like cobwebs, secretly aside.
-
-[Illustration: EDGAR ALLAN POE]
-
-[His failures.]
-
-With a mind so sensitive, a coinage so rare, and a technique so
-thorough, it is curious that he should so frequently have failed. And
-yet, when we examine his failures they are not difficult to explain.
-They are due in every case, saving only his attempts to be funny,
-which are like hangman's jokes, to sudden rents in the veils of his
-illusions, made by single impossible phrases whose impossibility
-he seems to have been unable to recognise. I could give a hundred
-examples, but perhaps none better than the excruciating line in an
-otherwise beautiful poem, where he tells us that
-
- 'The sweet Lenore hath "gone before," with Hope, that flew beside.'
-
-Lapses like that destroy like lightning flashes the mysterious
-atmosphere he has been at pains to create. They are the penalty he had
-to pay for being a citizen in a youthful democracy. Americans are never
-safe from the pitfalls of a language that is older than their nation.
-
-[His isolation.]
-
-In the America of that time, Poe was like the little boy in the
-grocer's shop, who, while the shopmen are busy with paper and string,
-dreams of green meadows and scribbles verses on the sugar bags. Even
-in Europe he would have been one of those men 'who live on islands in
-the sea of souls.' There are some like Scott and Gautier who are always
-called by their Christian names, and can talk unreservedly with a
-thousand. There are others more aloof in mind of whom it is difficult
-even to think with familiarity. It seems fitting enough to hear of
-Scott as Walter or Wattie, and of Gautier as Théo, even in old age;
-but who would have dared to call that man Tommy who heard in tavern
-song some echo of the music of the spheres? There are men who cannot be
-habitually good companions, and, when the talk is at its loudest, turn
-from the crowd, pull aside the curtain, and look up to see the pale
-moon far above the housetops. Such a man was Poe. He would have been
-lonely even in the city of Europe where he could perhaps have found
-three men of his own aloofness from the inessential, his own hatred
-of the commonplace, his own intense belief in individualism. He was
-extraordinarily lonely in America. His love of beauty, his elevation
-of his work above its results in gold, were next to incomprehensible
-by that people in that chaotic state of their development. Energetic
-and wholly practical, fiercely busied with material advancement,
-they could not understand his passionate, impractical, intellectual
-existence. His biographer, a literary man, remembered not that he was
-a great artist, but that he died through drink, not that he had made
-beautiful things but that he had gained little money by doing so. In
-the Poe who 'reeled across Broadway on the day of the publication of
-_The Raven_,' in the Poe who died in an hospital, they forgot the
-reality, and, in their hurry, found it easy to make a melodrama out of
-a gentle and inoffensive life. Their traditional idea of Poe allows his
-extravagances to represent him. It is as if we were to describe some
-hills by saying there was a lightning flash between the peaks. I prefer
-to think of the little cottage at Fordham, where he lived with his wife
-and her mother, and their pets, parrots and bobolinks, a peaceful,
-small citadel held by those three friends against the world. Throughout
-Poe's harassed existence this note of gentleness and quiet is always
-sounding somewhere below the discords of penury and suffering.
-
-[His work.]
-
-The result of his isolation, his poverty, his sensibility, and his
-intellectual energy was a great deal of work of no value whatever, some
-melancholy and beautiful verse, critical articles of a kind then new in
-America, a philosophical poem, some tales of the same flavour as the
-most delightful of Euclid's propositions, and some other stories that
-can only be fully enjoyed by those who come to them with the reverence
-and careful taste it is proper to bring to a glass of priceless wine.
-It is by them chiefly that he will be remembered. They are a delicacy,
-not a staple of food. They are not stories from which we can learn
-life; but they are the key to strange knowledge of ourselves. They
-leave us richer, not in facts but in emotions. We find our way with
-their help into novel corners of sensation. They are like rare coloured
-goblets or fantastic metal-work, and we find, often with surprise,
-that we have waited for them. That is their vindication, that the test
-between the valueless and the invaluable of the fantastic. There are
-tales of twisted extravagance that stir us with no more emotion than is
-given by an accidental or capricious decoration never felt or formed in
-the depths of a man. But these stories, like those patterns, however
-grotesque, that have once meant the world to a mind sensible to beauty,
-have a more than momentary import. Like old melody, like elaborate and
-beautiful dancing, like artificial light, like the sight of poison
-or any other concentrated power, they are among the significant
-experiences that are open to humanity.
-
-
-
-
-HAWTHORNE AND MORAL ROMANCE
-
-
-
-
-HAWTHORNE AND MORAL ROMANCE
-
-
-[The essayist in story-telling.]
-
-HAWTHORNE is one of the earliest story-tellers whom we remember as much
-for himself as for his books. He is loved or hated, as an essayist is
-loved or hated, without reference to the subjects on which he happened
-to write. He wrote in a community for whom a writer was still so novel
-as to possess some rags of the old splendours of the sage; an author
-was something wonderful, and no mere business man. He had not to expect
-any hostility in his reader, but rather a readiness to admire (of which
-he seldom took advantage), and an eagerness to enjoy him for his own
-sake. He could assume, as an essayist assumes when he dances naked
-before his readers, that they were not there to scoff. He brought a
-sweet ingenuous spirit into modern story-telling that would perhaps
-have been impossible had he been writing for a more sophisticated
-audience. We love him for it. He made books, he said, 'for his known
-and unknown friends.' As he says it, he brings us all into the circle.
-When we think of Fielding, Bunyan, or Cervantes, we think of _Tom
-Jones_, _Pilgrim's Progress_, and _Don Quixote_; when we think of
-_Elia_, _Table Talk_, and _The Scarlet Letter_, we think of Lamb,
-Hazlitt, and Hawthorne.
-
-[Hawthorne and Poe.]
-
-This engaging, unsuspicious, essayistical attitude of his would have
-been quite impossible to Poe; but we must remember that Hawthorne
-and Poe, although contemporary, knew very different Americas. Poe's
-birth was a kind of accident, and he approached America penniless, so
-that she was a hostile place to him, a country of skinflint editors
-and large terrible towns, from which to escape in books, and, as far
-as possible, in life. He hated the New America, but he belonged to
-her. Hawthorne belonged to the old. His family connected him with her
-history; he was never at her mercy; as we learn from his rambling
-prefaces, that would be intolerable in a less lovable writer, she was
-endeared to him by a delightful boyhood, and did not refuse him a
-peaceful youth of devotion to his art. She never treated him otherwise
-than tenderly, and he did not leave her until as a representative of
-her people, nor sought escape from her in books, except for those of
-his shadowy creatures who could move with greater freedom in a less
-bread-and-buttery fairyland.
-
-[Illustration: NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE]
-
-[Hawthorne's life.]
-
-His life, as we learn it from those prefaces and from his biographers,
-was as gentle as the man himself. We read of quiet days of work in
-a study from whose windows he could watch the sunlight through the
-willow boughs; of days on the river with Thoreau in a canoe which
-that angular reformer had built with his own hands; of meetings
-with Emerson walking in the woods, 'with that pure intellectual gleam
-diffused about his person like the garment of a shining one'; of
-evenings before the red fire in a little room with white moonlight
-bringing out the patterns on the carpet, weaving the tapestries
-of dream that were next day to come alive upon the paper. These
-people, who were to make the intellectual life of America, were not
-American in the peace of their existence. Hawthorne, in the newest
-of all countries, wrote 'in a clear, brown, twilight atmosphere.'
-He was a lover of secondhand things, and so clothed things with his
-imagination that all he touched was green with ivy. No contemporary or
-even historical romances have about them such ancient tenderness and
-legendary dusk as his. It is extraordinary to think that he was born
-within two years of Poe. He thought 'the world was very weary, and
-should recline its vast head on the first convenient pillow and take an
-age-long nap.' America, at least, had a thousand other things to do,
-but it was not until he had seen Europe that Hawthorne recognised the
-fact.
-
-[His notebooks.]
-
-His notebooks reflect at the same time this quiet life and its
-excitements, the stirring adventures of an artist in search of
-perfection. He 'had settled down by the wayside of life like a man
-under an enchantment.' None but the artist can know how happy such
-enchantment is. He notices the flashing soles of a boy's bare feet
-running past him in the wood, and 'a whirlwind, whirling the dried
-leaves round in a circle, not very violently.' He writes one day, 'The
-tops of the chestnut trees have a whitish appearance, they being, I
-suppose, in bloom'; two days later, unsatisfied, he makes another
-attempt to fit his words to his impression:--'The tops of the chestnut
-trees are peculiarly rich, as if a more luscious sunshine were falling
-on them than anywhere else, "Whitish," as above, don't express it.' One
-of his biographers, himself no mean artist, suggests that Hawthorne's
-must have been a dull existence, if in it such trifles were worthy of
-note. But the frequency of such notes, interspersed by innumerable
-sketches for stories, is not a sign of the poverty of Hawthorne's life
-but of its opulence. For Hawthorne, busied always with dim things not
-easily expressed, every walk was a treasure hunt that might supply some
-phrase, some simile, that would give blood and sinew to the ghost of an
-idea.
-
-[The material of his work.]
-
-His friends were as far removed from the ordinary as himself. He was
-never 'bustled in the world of workaday.' Even his spell of life as
-surveyor in the Customs was such that his description of it reads
-not unlike Charles Lamb's recollections of the old clerks in the
-South-Sea House. The Customs House was a place of sleep and cobwebs,
-and the people in it, mostly retired sea-captains, 'partook of the
-genius of the place.' 'Pour connaître l'homme,' says Stendhal, 'il
-suffit de l'étudier soi-même; pour connaître les hommes, il faut les
-pratiquer.' Hawthorne had never kept company with men; his nature
-and his circumstances made him learn man from his own heart. He was
-never hampered as a romancer by the kind of knowledge that would have
-made him a novelist. He deals not with manners, for he had little
-opportunity of studying them, nor with passions, for they had not
-greatly troubled him, but with conscience. He plays upon the strings of
-conscience, and, dusty as the instrument may be, his playing wakes an
-echo.
-
-Perhaps if he had been less personal, less lovable, we could not have
-tolerated his tampering with those secret strings whose music is so
-novel and so poignant. Certainly we would have found him intolerable
-if he had been less serious. If he had jangled those fibres with a
-laugh they would have given no response. If he had waked them with a
-careless discord they would have broken. We can bear it because he is
-Hawthorne; we listen to him because he is in earnest. All, in such
-matters, depends upon the attitude of the artist. War, for example, is
-a terrible thing in Tolstoy, a joyous thing in Dumas, and an ordinary
-thing, neither terrible nor joyous, in Smollett. We take to ourselves
-something of an artist's outlook, and sin is nothing to us unless we
-hear of it from a man to whom it is momentous.
-
-[Goya's 'Monk and Witch'.]
-
-I remember a little picture by Goya representing a monk and a witch.
-The woman, with white staring eyeballs, wide nostrils, fallen jaw,
-shrinks back against the monk in puling terror; and he, crazed utterly,
-his eyes fixed on nothingness, shrieks with gaping mouth some horrid
-incantation that drowns the gasping breathing of the witch. Theirs is
-no physical fear of fire or sword or scourge: they have sinned, and
-seen the face of God. Before me are a set of reproductions of Holbein's
-'Dance of Death.' Death lies before the feet of the burgess in the
-road, plucks unconcernedly at the robe of the abbot, viciously sticks
-a spear through the middle of the knight, and snuffs the altar candles
-in the nun's cell, where her young lover is playing on a guitar. But
-the picture of Judgment at the end is no more than a careless grace
-after meat. It is there with propriety but without conviction. Death is
-a full stop, not a comma. What is it to me that the burgess may have
-cheated, the abbot be a hypocrite, the knight a roysterer, and the
-nun a wanton? Death is close at hand to put a stop to the doings of
-them all. I do not know what was the sin of the monk or the witch, and
-yet the mere memory of their spiritual terror moves me more than the
-pictures before my eyes. Their peril is not of this world.
-
-[The background of Hawthorne's tales.]
-
-Hawthorne's finest stories are a Dance of Death, in which Death is
-no mere end of a blind alley, but a dividing of the ways. Those dim
-people he found in his own soul are important to us by their chances of
-salvation or damnation. Their feet
-
- 'Are in the world as on a tight-rope slung
- Over the gape and hunger of Hell.'[8]
-
-The background to their actions is not happiness and misery, questions
-of this world only, but righteousness and mortal sin. The fortunes
-of Hawthorne's characters are shaping for Eternity. When Ethan Brand
-flings himself into the furnace, what one of Hawthorne's readers ever
-thought he died there?
-
-Even this dignity of grave belief, combined with the charm of the
-writer, would not excuse unskilful playing. But Hawthorne is as
-dexterous on his chosen instrument as Poe on his, and as consciously
-an artist as Stevenson, who indeed, in _Markheim_, plays, no more
-skilfully than he, Hawthorne's peculiar tune. In the preface to _The
-House of the Seven Gables_ there is a paragraph that, though long, it
-is not impertinent to quote. It shows how carefully he had thought out
-the possibilities, and how scrupulously he had defined the limits, of
-his chosen art.
-
-[Romance and Novel.]
-
- 'When a writer calls his work a Romance it need hardly be observed
- that he wishes to claim a certain latitude, both as to its fashion
- and material, which he would not have felt himself entitled to
- assume had he professed to be writing a Novel. The latter form
- of composition is presumed to aim at a very minute fidelity, not
- merely to the possible, but to the probable and ordinary course
- of man's experience. The former--while, as a work of art, it must
- subject itself to laws, and while it sins unpardonably so far as
- it may swerve aside from the truth of the human heart--has fairly
- a right to present that truth under circumstances, to a great
- extent, of the writer's own choosing or creation. If he thinks
- fit, also, he may so manage his atmospherical medium as to bring
- out or mellow the lights, and deepen and enrich the shadows of the
- picture. He will be wise, no doubt, to make a very moderate use of
- the privileges here stated, and especially to mingle the Marvellous
- rather as a slight, delicate, and evanescent flavour, than as any
- portion of the actual substance of the dish offered to the public.
- He can hardly be said, however, to commit a literary crime, even if
- he disregard this caution.'
-
-There is a hint here of the provincial pedant; 'dishes offered
-to the public' are a little out of date; but the principles are
-sound. Hawthorne could not give clear outlines to the results of
-his 'burrowings in our common nature' unless he set them in an
-atmospherical medium that made such outlines possible for things so
-vague and so mysterious. Romance left him free to do so. He could
-make a world to fit them, a patterned world, coloured to suggest
-New England, Italy, or Nowhere. He was never forced to shock us by
-introducing them into quite ordinary life. He never loses command over
-his 'atmospherical medium,' and never weakens the importance of his
-characters by letting them escape from the dominion of morals. And yet
-his stories are not 'impaled on texts.' Moral feeling makes them alive,
-but it is treated like the Marvellous--'mingled as a slight, delicate,
-and evanescent flavour.' No artist had ever such tricky balances to
-keep. No artist keeps his balance more successfully.
-
-[Devices of craftsmanship.]
-
-His artistry is as subtle in the details as in the design. It is hard
-to examine his stories unmoved. But, if we quiet our consciences, and
-still the throbbing of our hearts, and force ourselves to read them
-paragraph by paragraph with scientific calm, we find there are few
-tales from which we can learn more delicate devices of craftsmanship
-in making afraid, and in giving reality to intangible and mysterious
-things. Before such skill the most prosaic reader surrenders his reason
-and shudders with the rest.
-
-Notice, for example, in _Rappacini's Daughter_, Hawthorne's way of
-making credible the marvellous. He states the miracle quite simply,
-and by asking 'Was it really so?' lays, without making his intention
-obvious, a double emphasis on every point. On every point he throws
-a doubt, and stamps belief into the mind. When Giovanni wonders if
-Beatrice is like the flowers in that rich garden of death, in breath
-and body poisonous, 'to be touched only with a glove, nor to be
-approached without a mask,' Hawthorne suggests that he had grown
-morbid. We know at once that he had not. A beautiful insect flutters
-about her and dies at her feet. 'Now here it could not be but that
-Giovanni Guasconti's eyes deceived him.' We know that they did not.
-As Beatrice goes into the house, Giovanni fancies that the flowers
-he had given her were already withering in her grasp. 'It was an
-idle thought,' says Hawthorne, 'there could be no possibility of
-distinguishing a faded flower from a fresh one at so great a distance.'
-We see the dead petals fall like leaves in autumn as she steps across
-the threshold.
-
-And then notice, in _The Scarlet Letter_, his use of simple actions
-made significant by their contexts. When Hester Prynne has thrown
-aside, as if for ever, the searing symbol of her outlawry, her child
-refuses to recognise her, until she picks it miserably up, and pains
-her bosom once again with the embroidered scarlet character. 'Now
-thou art my mother, indeed!' cries the child, 'and I am thy little
-Pearl!' And when Hester tells her that one day the minister will share
-a fireside with them, and hold her on his knees, and teach her many
-things, and love her dearly--'And will he always keep his hand over
-his heart?' the child inquires. It is quite natural in her to notice a
-peculiar habit, and to cling to a familiar piece of ornament; but her
-words and actions assume the dignity of portents when we know what
-they meant to that poor woman and that conscience-stricken man.
-
-[The power of details.]
-
-The imagination needs straws to make its bricks, and Hawthorne is
-careful never to set it the impossible task. He knows how to squeeze
-all the emotion in his material into one small fragment of pictorial
-suggestion that can be confidently left to produce its effect in
-concert with the reader's mind. Remember how Goodman Brown, at setting
-out, looked back and saw 'the head of Faith still peeping after
-him with a melancholy air in spite of her pink ribbons.' A trifle,
-apparently, but one that is not to be wasted. After his talk with the
-devil, he thought he heard his wife's voice above him in the air, as
-an unseen multitude of saints and sinners were encouraging her to
-that awful meeting in the forest. '"Faith!" he shouted in a voice of
-agony and desperation, and the echoes of the forest mocked him, crying
-"Faith! Faith!" as if bewildered wretches were seeking her all through
-the wilderness. The cry of grief, rage, and terror was yet piercing the
-night when the unhappy wretch held his breath for a response. There
-was a scream, drowned immediately in a louder murmur of voices, fading
-into far-off laughter, as the dark cloud swept away, leaving the dear
-and silent sky above Goodman Brown. But something fluttered lightly
-down through the air and caught on the branch of a tree. The young man
-seized it, and beheld a pink ribbon.'--A pink ribbon, a merry little
-thing that we can see and touch, is made a sudden, awful summary of
-horror and despair.
-
-He makes nature throb with his own mood, and by imperceptible art
-weights the simplest words with the emotion of his tale. How are the
-very tones of madness caught as the young man flourishes the devil's
-stick and strides along the forest path. '"Ha! ha! ha!" roared Goodman
-Brown when the wind laughed at him. "Let us hear which will laugh
-loudest. Think not to frighten me with your deviltry. Come witch, come
-wizard, come Indian powpow, come devil himself and here comes Goodman
-Brown. You may as well fear him as he fear you."' That paragraph is the
-work of a master.
-
-[The character of his work.]
-
-And yet, artist as he was, Hawthorne lived too near provincialism to
-show no signs of its influence in his outlook and his work. He could
-not enjoy statues without clothes. He was able to commit the enormity
-of typifying a search for the absolute beautiful by the making of a
-tiny toy butterfly that flapped its wings just like a real one. Nor
-did he ever reach that conception of his art, of all art, that sets
-prettiness in niches round rather than upon the altar of the temple.
-He valued perhaps too highly the simple flowerlike embroidery that is
-characteristic of his work. When, while he was in the Custom House,
-this power of facile prettiness deserted him for a season, he produced
-nothing, and feared that all his power was gone, for it was not in
-him to conjure without a wand. He thought afterwards that he might
-have written something with the pedestrian fidelity of the novel; but
-that was the one thing he could never do. A man who is accustomed to
-see his pages glimmer with opalescent colour, and to feel the touch
-of elfin fingers on his brow, is oddly disconcerted in those moments
-when the little people must be brushed aside like midges, and the
-glimmering veil be torn by the elbows of a ruder reality. Such men are
-not so common that we can complain of the _défauts de leurs qualités_.
-And indeed, in his more solemn stories, instinct with the spiritual
-terror of Goya's miniature, the grace that never leaves him adds to
-the effect. A rapier seems never more cruel than in a hand elaborately
-gloved. What kind of man is that, we ask, who, balancing souls between
-Heaven and Hell, can never quite forget his friendship with the
-fairies?
-
-
-
-
-MÉRIMÉE AND CONVERSATIONAL STORY-TELLING
-
-
-
-
-MÉRIMÉE AND CONVERSATIONAL STORY-TELLING
-
-
-[Mérimée's attitude towards writing.]
-
-THERE is a lean athletic air about the tales of Prosper Mérimée. Their
-author is like a man who throws balls at the cocoa-nuts in the fair--to
-bring them down, and not for the pleasure of throwing. His writing was
-something quite outside himself, undertaken for the satisfaction of
-feeling himself able to do it. He was in the habit of setting himself
-tasks. 'I will blacken some paper,' he writes, 'in 1829,' and he keeps
-his word. He was not an author, in the modern professional sense,
-but a man, one of whose activities was authorship. There is a real
-difference between writers of these classes, the amateurs existing
-outside their work, the professionals breathing only through it.
-Gautier, full-blooded, brutal, splendid creature, is almost invisible
-but in his books. Mérimée, irreproachably dressed, stands beside his,
-looking in another direction. I am reminded of the sporting gentlemen
-of Hazlitt's day who now and again would step into the ring and show
-that they too had a pretty way with the gloves. Late in his life, when
-one of his juvenile theatrical pieces was to be played for the first
-time, Mérimée went to the performance, and heard a hostile noise in the
-house. 'Is it me they are hissing?' he asked, 'I am going to hiss with
-the rest.' I think of Congreve asking Voltaire to consider him as a
-plain gentleman, not as an author.
-
-[Illustration: PROSPER MÉRIMÉE]
-
-Writing was only one of the interests of Mérimée's life; only one
-of the innumerable tasks he set himself. He learnt half a dozen
-languages without being a mere linguist. He travelled in half a dozen
-countries without being a traveller. He was extremely erudite, but
-never a bookish scholar. He fulfilled with enthusiasm his duties as
-Inspector of Ancient Monuments without lapsing into a dusty-handed
-antiquary. He saw much of the fashionable life of Paris without being
-a man of the world. He was a courtier without being nothing but a
-courtier, and could accomplish a state mission without turning into a
-diplomatist. He studied 'la théologie, la tactique, la poliorcétique,
-l'architecture, l'épigraphie, la numismatique, la magie et la cuisine,'
-without being solely a theologian, a tactician, a specialist in
-sieges, an architect, a decipherer of inscriptions, a coin collector,
-a wizard, or an undiluted cook. No more was he a writer, as Dumas,
-Hazlitt, Hawthorne, and Keats were writers. On no shore did he burn
-his boats. His character was as various as his activities. He was
-sensualist and sentimentalist, dandy and Bohemian. Evenings begun in
-the salon of Mme. de Boigne or at the Hôtel Castellane were, his
-biographer tells us, finished behind the scenes at the Opera. He wrote
-delightful love-letters, but whole series of his letters to his friends
-are unfitted for print by consistent indecency. He read his tales to
-his Empress, and told them in the gipsy tongue by the camp-fires of
-Andalusian muleteers. His experiments in literature were analogous
-to his experiments in cooking. Both were expressions of an intense
-curiosity about life and the methods of life, and a thirst for personal
-practical efficiency in them all. Never had man more facets in which to
-see the world. It is important in this essay, that considers only one
-of them, not to forget that there were others.
-
-[The imaginary author of his tales.]
-
-It is indeed not easy to see more than one facet of a man's personality
-at once, and difficult not to assume that this one facet is the whole.
-The _curés_ of the old churches in France who saw Mérimée busied in
-protecting the ancient buildings from ruin and restoration would
-have been amazed by the witty dandy of the dinners in the Café de
-la Rotonde, or by the author of _Colomba_. Each one of such a man's
-expressions suggests a complete portrait, but only the composite
-picture tells the truth. It is difficult not to reason from his work
-and build up an imaginary author--a discreet, slightly ironical person,
-who smiles only with the corners of his mouth, never laughs, never
-weeps, modestly disclaims any very personal connection with his tales,
-and is careful to seem as little moved as may be by the terrible or
-mysterious things he sets before us. This imaginary polite person,
-who represented Mérimée in conversation as well as in books, is not
-Mérimée, but, just now, as I see him quietly smiling in the air before
-me, I know who he is. He is the conventional raconteur, whose manner
-every Englishman assumes in the telling of anecdote or ghost story.
-
-[Printed and spoken stories.]
-
-Perhaps each nation has its own. Perhaps each nation adopts an attitude
-for anecdote peculiar to its own genius. The French at any rate is
-very different from the English. The Frenchman will gesticulate in
-his tale, suit the expression of his face to its emotions, and try,
-ingratiatingly, to win our indulgence for his story, that becomes,
-as he tells it, part of himself. The Englishman, more tenacious of
-his dignity, less willing to hazard it for an effect, throws all
-responsibility upon the thing itself. In England, the distinction
-between printed story-telling and story-telling by word of mouth is
-more marked than elsewhere. The object of both is to interest and
-move us, but, while the literary artist makes no bones about it, and
-takes every advantage possible, giving the setting of his tale, its
-colour scheme, its scent, its atmosphere, the plain Englishman shrinks
-from all assumption of craftsmanship, sets out his facts bare, rough
-like uncut stones, and repudiates by a purposely disordered language,
-perhaps by a few words of slang, any desire of competition with the
-professional.[9] And we, the audience, allow ourselves to be moved
-more readily by an amateur than by a man who avows his intention of
-moving us. The avowed intention provokes a kind of hostility; it is a
-declaration of war, an open announcement of a plan to usurp the throne
-of our own mind, and to order the sensations we like to think we can
-control. We are more lenient with the amateur; we wish to save his
-face; politeness and good-fellowship are traitors in our citadel, and
-we conspire with the enemy to compass our own yielding.
-
-[Mérimée's adoption of the conventions of anecdote.]
-
-Mérimée gives his tales no more background than an Englishman could
-put without immodesty into an after-dinner conversation. He does not
-decorate them with words, nor try to suggest atmosphere by rhythm or
-any other of the subtler uses of language. He does not laugh at his
-jokes, nor, in moments of pathos, show any mist in his eyes. The only
-openly personal touches in his stories are those sentences of irony as
-poignant as those of another great conversationalist, whose _Modest
-Proposal_ for the eating of little children is scarcely more cruel
-than _Mateo Falcone_. His style is without felicities. It has none of
-the Oriental pomp of Gautier's prose, none of the torrential eloquence
-of Hugo's; but its limitations are its virtues. Pomp is the ruin of a
-plain fact as of a plain man, and rhetoric rolls facts along too fast
-to do anything but smooth them. This style, that seems to disclaim any
-pretension to be a style at all, leaves facts unencumbered, with their
-corners unpolished. It emphasises Mérimée's continual suggestion that
-he is not a story-teller, and so helps to betray us into his power.
-But I cannot understand those critics who find it a style of clear
-glass that shows us facts through no personality whatever. Always, in
-reading a Mérimée, I have an impression of listening to a man who has
-seen the world, and was young once upon a time, who loves Brantôme, and
-who in another century would have been a friend of Anthony Hamilton,
-and perhaps have written or had a minor part in memoirs like those
-of the Count Grammont. And this man is the imaginary mouthpiece of
-English anecdote, the mask handed from speaker to speaker at an English
-dinner-table.
-
-[Mérimée's _anglomanie_.]
-
-Mérimée himself had something of the appearance of an Englishman;
-everything except the smile, according to Taine. No Frenchman can write
-of him without referring to his _anglomanie_. His mother had English
-relatives, and Hazlitt, Holcroft, and Hazlitt's worshipped Northcote
-were among his father's friends. He was not baptized in the Catholic
-religion. He seems to have grown up in an atmosphere not unlike that of
-many English intellectual families, and very early made friends across
-the Channel for himself. This Englishness perhaps partly accounts for
-the peculiar attitude he took as a story-teller, and also made possible
-that curious reconciliation between the virtues of rival schools that
-the attitude demanded; made possible, that is to say, the apparent
-paradox of a man whose subjects were Romantic, whose style was almost
-Classical, and whose stories were yet a prophecy of the Realists. It
-is not a French characteristic to recognise virtues in more than one
-type at once, and to combine them. 'Le Roi est mort; vive le Roi.' The
-French invented that saying. They do not recognise compromises, but are
-exclusive in their judgments, and regulate their opinions by general
-rules. A Romantic hates all Classicists, a Realist finds his worst term
-of opprobrium in the word Romantic. An Englishman, on the other hand,
-does not think of regulating his affections or actions by a theory. If
-he has principles, he locks them up with his black clothes for use on
-special occasions. He keeps a sturdy affection for Oliver Cromwell,
-without letting his love for the Commonwealth abate in the least his
-loyalty to the King. Mérimée seems extraordinarily English in being
-able to own Romantic ideals, without using Romantic method.
-
-[The contrast between his manner and his material.]
-
-The conversational story-telling depends for its success, not on the
-wit or charm of the talker, but on the plots of his stories. No more
-exigent test of the intrinsic power of a tale can be applied than
-this, of telling it badly in conversation. A good story will sometimes
-gain by the naked recital of its facts; a bad one is immediately
-betrayed. Bad stories, in this sense, are those that resemble the
-women of whom Lyly wrote:--'Take from them their periwigges, their
-paintings, their Jewells, their rowles, their boulstrings, and thou
-shalt soone perceive that a woman is the least part of hir selfe.'
-How many times, in repeating to a friend the story of a book, you
-have become suddenly aware it was an empty, worthless thing that, in
-clothes more gorgeous than it had a right to wear, had made you its
-dupe for a moment. Mérimée was compelled by his method to tell good
-stories or none. His material, to be sufficiently strong to stand
-without support, to be built with rigid economy, and to make its
-effects out of its construction, to be told as if with a desire of
-making no impression, and to make an impression all the stronger for
-such telling, could not be of a light or delicate nature. His events
-had to be striking, visible, conclusive. He had to choose stories in
-which something happened. There is death in almost every one of his
-tales. Hence comes the amazing contrast between his work and that of
-the Romantics. The large gesture, the simple violent passions are his
-as well as theirs, because he needed them, but, while they matched
-their subjects in their temperaments, and wrote of hot blood with
-pulsing veins, everything in Mérimée's stories is vivid and passionate
-except the author. The atmosphere of his tales is not warm or moist,
-but extraordinarily rarified. In that clear air his colours seem almost
-white. If they were not so brilliant we should not perceive them at
-all. Even his women are chosen for the attitude. The women a man loves
-are usually reflected in his work. But Mérimée's women are the women
-of Romance, dying for love or for hate, ready at any moment to throw
-their emotions into dramatic action, while the women he loved were
-capricious, whimsical, tender seldom, _outrées_ never. The writer
-needed picturesque women as clear as facts. The man loved women who
-never betrayed themselves, but were sufficiently elusive to give him an
-Epicurean pleasure in pursuing them.
-
-[An art of construction.]
-
-The art of Mérimée's tales is one of expository construction. He was
-compelled by his self-denials to be as conscious an artist as Poe. He
-is like a good chess-player who surrenders many pieces, and is forced
-to make most wonderful play with the few that remain. His effects are
-got from the material of his tales, not superimposed on the vital stuff
-like the front of a Venetian palace on the plain wall. He takes his
-dramatic material, and sets it before us in his undecorated style,
-so that no morsel of its vitality is wasted, smothering no wild
-gesture in elaborate drapery, but cutting it out so nakedly that every
-quivering sinew can be seen. His art has been compared to drawing, but
-it is more like sculpture. His stories are so cleanly carved out of
-existence that they are 'without deception.' We can examine them from
-above and from below, in a dozen different lights. There is no point of
-view from which the artist begs us to refrain. Behind a drawing there
-is a bare sheet. Behind a story of Mérimée's there is the other side.
-
-[Pointillism in facts.]
-
-His art is more like painting in those few tales of the marvellous
-that are his ghost stories, as the others are his anecdotes. Mérimée
-had the archæologist's hatred of the mysterious, and the artist's
-delight in creating it. He reconciled the two by producing mysterious
-effects by statements of the utmost clarity, the very clarity of the
-statements throwing the reader off his guard so that he does not
-perceive the purposeful skill with which they are chosen and put
-together. There is a school of painting in France, whose followers
-call themselves Pointillists; they get their effects by laying spots
-of simple colours side by side, each one separate, each one though in
-the right position with regard to other spots of other colours placed
-in its neighbourhood. At a sufficient distance they merge luminously
-into the less simple colours of the picture. Mérimée's treatment of
-the marvellous was not unlike this. The vague mystery of _La Vénus
-d'Ille_ is not reflected by any vagueness or mystery in the telling
-of the tale. It is impossible to point to the single sentence, the
-single paragraph that makes the mystery mysterious. You cannot find
-them because they do not exist. Instead, there are a hundred morsels of
-fact. Not one of them is incredible; not one is without a reasonable
-explanation if an explanation is necessary. And yet all these concrete,
-simple facts combine imperceptibly in producing the extraordinary
-supernatural feeling of the tale. Compare this negative manner of
-treating a miracle with the frank, positive fairy-tale of Gautier's
-_Arria Marcella_. The effects of both tales are perfectly achieved,
-but Arria Marcella belongs to written story-telling. We believe in her
-because Gautier wishes us to believe, and uses every means of colour
-and rhythm and sensual suggestion to compel his readers to subject
-their imaginations to his own. The Venus belongs to story-telling
-by word of mouth. Hers is a ghost story whose shudder we covet, and
-experience, in spite of ourselves, in spite of the half-incredulous
-story-teller, by virtue of those simple facts so cunningly put together.
-
-[Strength or charm.]
-
-But to write analytically of such stories is to write with compass and
-rule, dully, awkwardly, technically, badly. It is impossible to express
-the excellence of a bridge except by showing how perfectly its curves
-represent the principles of its design, and to talk like an architect
-of the method of its building. And that is so very inadequate. It is
-easy to write of warmth, of delicacy, of sweetness; there is nothing
-harder in the world than to write of the icy strength that is shown
-not in action but in construction. And although there is a real charm
-about the shy, active, intellectual man who made them, a charm that is
-shown in his love-letters, yet there is no charm at all about Mérimée's
-stories. The difference between them and such tales as Nathaniel
-Hawthorne's is that between the little Grecian lady in baked clay, who
-stands upon my mantelpiece, still removing with what grace of curved
-body and neck and delicate arm the thorn that pricked her tiny foot
-some thousand years ago, and the copy of an Egyptian god, standing
-upright, one straight leg advanced, his jackal head set square upon
-his shoulders, his arms stiff at his sides, his legs like pillars, so
-strong in the restraint of every line that to look at him is a bracing
-of the muscles. There is no charm in him, no grace, no delicacy, and
-he needs neither delicacy, grace, nor charm. Erect in his own economy
-of strength he has an implacable, strenuous power that any added
-tenderness would weaken and perhaps destroy.
-
-
-
-
-FLAUBERT
-
-
-
-
-FLAUBERT
-
-
-'I AM the last of the fathers of the church,' said Flaubert, and on
-this text his niece remarks that 'with his long chestnut coat, and
-little black silk skull-cap, he had something the air of one of the
-Port-Royal solitaries.' The metaphor is accurately chosen. Flaubert
-lived in an atmosphere of monastic devotion to his art, and the
-solitaries of Port-Royal were not more constant than he to their
-intellectual preoccupations. A man of excessive openness to sensation,
-he fled it and was fascinated by it. He would take ever so little of
-the world and torture himself with its examination because it hurt
-him to look at it. Life, and especially that life whose sensitiveness
-was so slight as, in comparison with his own, to have no existence,
-brought him continual pain. 'La bêtise entre mes pores.' Stupidity
-touching him anywhere made him shrink like a snail touched with a
-feather. He had _recoquillements_, shrinkings up, when with his dearest
-friends, and it was pain to him to be recalled to ordinary existence.
-He escaped from modernity in dreams of the Orient, but was continually
-drawn back by memory of the unhappiness that was waiting for him, to
-the contemplation of those ordinary people whose slightest act, as he
-imagined it, struck such a grating discord with himself. An exuberant
-life like Gautier's was impossible to such a man. He could not be so
-gregarious a recluse as Balzac. He had to fashion a peculiar retreat,
-a room with two windows, from one of which he could see the stars,
-and from the other watch and listen to the people whom he hated and
-found so efficient as the instruments of his self torture. He found
-the seclusion he desired in a most absolute devotion to the art of
-literature, which was in his hands the art of making beauty out of
-pain. Pain, self-inflicted, was at the starting-point of all his works,
-and in most of them went with him step by step throughout.
-
-[Illustration: GUSTAVE FLAUBERT]
-
-[Flaubert and the bourgeois.]
-
-An analysis of the pain that Flaubert suffered in examining
-Philistines, that white light of suffering which throws up so clearly
-the bourgeois figures on which he let it play, supplies the key
-not only to the matter of much of his work, but to its manner, and
-particularly to that wonderful prose of his, whose scrupulosity has
-been and is so frequently misunderstood. Flaubert was not pained by a
-bourgeois because he felt differently from himself. He was pained by
-a bourgeois because a bourgeois did not know that he felt differently
-from himself, because a bourgeois never knew how he felt at all.
-Whole wolves hate a lame one. It has never been stated with what
-inveterate hatred a lame one regards whole wolves. And Flaubert was
-less fitted for life than an ordinary man. He was given to know when
-he was honest or dishonest to himself. In so far was he, on their own
-ground, weaker than those others, who never know whether they tell the
-truth or a lie. He was born as it were with no skin over his heart.
-He had no need to make guesses at his feelings. What more terrible
-nightmare could be imagined for such a man than to hear men and women,
-educated, as the bourgeois are, into a horrible facility of speech,
-using the language of knowledge and emotion, unchecked by any doubts as
-to their possible inaccuracy. In all bourgeois life, where language and
-action have larger scales than are necessary, there is a discrepancy
-between expression and the thing for which expression is sought. For
-Flaubert, sensitive to this discrepancy as the ordinary man is not, it
-was a perpetual pain. And just as a man who has a nerve exposed in one
-of his teeth, touches it again and again, in spite of himself, for the
-exquisite twinge that reminds him it is there, so Flaubert in more than
-one half of his books is occupied in hurting himself by the delicate
-and infinitely varied search for this particular discord.
-
-[Flaubert's prose.]
-
-Flaubert's prose is due, like his unhappiness, to his inhuman trueness
-of feeling. He realised that flexible as language is, there are almost
-insuperable difficulties in the way of any one who wishes to put an
-idea accurately into words. He went to the bottom of all writing and
-announced that literature is founded on the word; and that unless you
-have the right word you have the wrong literature. He was a little
-puzzled at the survival of the mighty improvisations of older times,
-although he loved them; but there was no doubt in his mind that his
-own way was not 'a primrose path to the everlasting bonfire' of bad
-books. Whatever he wrote, he would have it in words chosen one by
-one, scrupulously matched in scent, colour, and atmosphere to the
-ideas or emotions he wished to express. His whole creed was to tell
-the truth. What exactly did he feel? These were the letters that were
-always flaming before him. It is vivid discomfort to a labourer to be
-cross-questioned, and forced to find words for his unrealised meanings.
-With increased facility of speech we grow callous, and, compromising
-with our words, write approximations to the thoughts that, not having
-accurately described, we can scarcely be said to possess. Flaubert, in
-disgust at such inexactitudes, forced on his own highly educated brain
-the discomfort of the cross-questioned labourer. Knowing the truth, he
-would say it or nothing, and rejected phrase after phrase in his search
-for precision. It was gain and loss to him; gain in texture, loss in
-scope. 'What a scope Balzac had,' he cried, and then: 'What a writer
-he would have been if only he had been able to write.' The work of such
-men is loosely knit in comparison with his, because built in a less
-resisting material. 'Oui,' says Gautier--
-
- 'Oui, l'œuvre sort plus belle
- D'une forme au travail
- Rebelle,
- Vers, marbre, onyx, émail.'
-
-Flaubert's attitude made prose a medium as hard, as challenging as
-these.
-
-It is difficult to believe that the older writers bought their
-excellence so dearly. Their thoughts cannot have been so biassed, for
-it is the expression of every bias, of the background, of the smell, of
-the feel of an idea that makes circumspicuity of writing so difficult.
-Montaigne, for example, sitting peaceably in his tower, asking himself
-with lively interest what were his opinions, was not at all like the
-almost terrible figure of Flaubert, striding to and fro in his chamber,
-wringing phrases from his nerves, asking passionately, ferociously,
-what he meant, and almost throttling himself for an accurate answer. Is
-it harder than it was to produce a masterpiece?
-
-[Romanticism and realism.]
-
-Flaubert, who held Chateaubriand a master, was the friend of Gautier,
-and the director in his art of Guy de Maupassant, who wrote with one
-hand _Madame Bovary_ and with the other _Salammbo_, who put in the same
-book _St. Julien l'Hospitalier_ and _Un Cœur Simple_, is, on a far
-grander scale than Mérimée, an illustration as well as a reason of the
-development of romanticism into realism. Flaubert's passionate care
-for the truth, would, if he had lived before the Romantic movement,
-have confined itself to the elaboration of a very scrupulous prose. But
-after the discovery of local colour, after the surprising discovery
-of the variety that exists in things, as great as the variety that
-exists in words and in their combinations, it was sure to apply itself
-not only to the writing but also to those external things that had
-suggested the ideas the writing was to embody. It would try to make
-the sentences true to their author; it would also try to make them
-true to the life they were to represent. It was Flaubert who said to
-De Maupassant as they passed a cabstand, 'Young man, describe that
-horse in one sentence so as to distinguish him from every other horse
-in the world, and I shall begin to believe that you have possibilities
-as a writer.' This demand for accurate portraiture turned the romantic
-realism of Balzac's _Comédie Humaine_ into the other realism of _Madame
-Bovary_. [_Madame Bovary._] Balzac had his models, yes, as hints in the
-back of his head, but he made his characters alive with his own energy
-and his own brain. As I have already pointed out, they are all too
-alive to be true. But Flaubert, true to himself in his manner, wished
-to be true to life in his matter. Madame Bovary, that second-rate,
-ordinary, foolish, weak, little provincial wife, has no atmosphere
-about her but her own. She has not been inoculated with the blood of
-Flaubert, as all the veins of all the characters of Balzac have been
-scorched with fire from those of that 'joyful wild boar.' When Flaubert
-wrote that everything in the book was outside himself, he was saying
-no more than the truth. He was as honest towards her and her life as
-he was towards his own ideas. She talks like herself. Now the older
-writers, like Fielding and Smollett, are content to let their people
-talk as men and women should talk to be fit for good literature. Even
-the characters of men like Balzac or Hugo say what they think, as
-nearly as their creators are themselves able to express it. Flaubert
-is infinitely more scrupulous. The Bovary never says what she thinks.
-Flaubert knew well enough what she was thinking, but sought out exactly
-those phrases and sentences beneath which she would have hidden her
-thought, those horrible bourgeois inaccuracies that it was torture for
-him to hear.
-
-A life so wholly concerned with intangible things seems too
-intellectual for humanity. I am glad to turn aside from it for a moment
-to remember the Flaubert who was loved by those who spent their days
-with him; the uncle who taught her letters to his little niece, and
-who would, as she says, have done anything imaginable to enliven her
-when sad or ill. 'One of his greatest pleasures was the amusement of
-those about him,' although he never saw a woman without thinking of
-her skeleton, a child without remembering that it would one day be
-old, or a cradle without finding in it the promise of a grave. He was
-one of the men who love their friends the dearer for their dislike of
-mankind in general. He never shaved without laughing at 'the intrinsic
-absurdity of human life,' and yet he lived out his own share in it
-with steadfast purpose, 'yoking himself to his work like an ox to the
-plough.'
-
-The result of his incessant labour divides itself into four kinds;
-novels of the bourgeoisie, a novel of the East, three short stories,
-and two other books that are, as it were, twin keys to the whole.
-
-[_Salammbo._]
-
-_Madame Bovary_ and _L'Éducation Sentimentale_ are the novels of the
-bourgeoisie, novels with an entirely new quality of vision, due to
-the sustained contrast between his own articulate habit of mind and
-the unconsciously inarticulate minds of his characters; these are the
-books commonly described as his contributions to Realism by men too
-ready to set him on their own level. Opposed to these two books there
-is _Salammbo_, an Oriental and ancient romance, a reposeful dream for
-him, in which move characters whose feelings and expressions are no
-more blurred than his own. All these books offer more delight at each
-re-reading, although the last, considered as an example of narrative,
-is almost a failure. The Romantics too often miss the trees for the
-wood. Flaubert's method makes it rather easy to miss the wood for the
-trees. But his trees are of such interest and beauty that we are ready
-to examine them singly. In writing _Madame Bovary_, his subject was
-close within his reach. Madame was too near to allow him to cover her
-up with a library of knowledge about his own times. But in _Salammbo_
-he was so anxious to be true to the life that he did not know, that he
-read until he knew too much. The book is made of perfect sentences,
-perfect descriptions, while the story itself is buried beneath a
-dust-heap of antiquity. Cartloads after cartloads of gorgeous things
-are emptied on the top of each other, until the whole is a glittering
-mass with here and there some splendid detail shining so brilliantly
-among the rest that we would like to remove it for a museum. The mass
-stirs: there are movements within it; but they are too heavily laden to
-shake themselves free and become visible and intelligible.
-
-[_Trois Contes._]
-
-No such criticism can be urged against the three short stories,
-the _Trois Contes_, in which Flaubert proves himself not only one
-of the greatest writers of all time, but also one of the greatest
-story-tellers. This little book is a fit pendant to the novels, since
-it represents both the Flaubert of _Madame Bovary_ and the Flaubert of
-_Salammbo_. _Un Cœur Simple_, the first of the three, is the story
-of a servant woman and her parrot, a subject that de Maupassant might
-have chosen. So completely is it weaned from himself, that no one
-would suspect that Flaubert wrote it after his mother's death, for the
-pleasure, in describing the provincial household, of remembering his
-own childhood. It and the two stories, _St. Julien l'Hospitalier_ and
-_Hérodias_, which are purely romantic in subject and treatment, and
-more scrupulous in technique than the finest of Gautier, are among the
-most beautiful tales that the nineteenth century produced. All three
-answer the supreme test of a dozen readings as admirably as those old
-improvisations from whose spirit they are so utterly alien.
-
-[_La Tentation de Saint Antoine_ and _Bouvard et Pécuchet_.]
-
-That is the sum of Flaubert's work in pure narrative. There are beside
-it two books, one a _Tentation de Saint Antoine_, that he spent his
-whole life in bringing to perfection, and the other, _Bouvard et
-Pécuchet_, that he left unfinished at his death. They are among the
-most wonderful philosophic books of the world. In an Oriental dream,
-a dialogue form with stage directions so explicit and descriptive as
-to do the work of narrative, and in a story whose form might have been
-dictated by Voltaire, whose material was the same as that used in the
-novels, he expressed man in the presence of Religion, and man in the
-presence of Knowledge. The legend of St. Anthony is treated by the
-Flaubert who loved the East, the story of Bouvard and Pécuchet by
-the Flaubert who tortured himself with observation of the bourgeois.
-St. Anthony is tempted of love and of all the religions; at last, not
-triumphing, but shaken and very weary, he kneels again, and Flaubert
-leaves him. Bouvard and Pécuchet, the two clerks given by the accident
-of a legacy the aloofness and the opportunity for development that was
-Anthony's, are tempted of love and of all the knowledges; at last made
-very miserable they return to their desks; that is where Flaubert would
-have left them if he had lived. To discuss the settings of these two
-great expositions is to ask the question that was asked by a disciple
-at the end of Voltaire's _Dream of Plato_. 'And then, I suppose, you
-awoke?' It is only permissible after recognising the grandeur of the
-underlying idea.
-
-[The statue of _Le Penseur_.]
-
-There have been two men with such a conception of thought. Rodin carved
-what Flaubert had written. The statue of _Le Penseur_, that stands
-in front of the Panthéon in Paris, is the statue of a man tormented
-like St. Anthony, baffled like Bouvard and Pécuchet. This statue does
-not represent man's dream of the power of thought, of the dominion of
-thought. That head is no clear mechanism, faultless and frictionless;
-that attitude is not one of placid contemplation. The head is in
-torture, the whole body grips itself in the agony of articulation. The
-statue is not that of _a_ thinker, but of _the_ thinker; man before
-the Universe, man unable to wrest the words out of himself. Flaubert
-had such a vision as that when he wrote the _Tentation_ and _Bouvard et
-Pécuchet_. He hated mankind because they could not share it with him.
-They did not know as he knew, or see as he saw, but knelt or worked,
-and were happy. This one stupendous conception of the true relation
-between man and thought is that on which all Flaubert's work is
-founded. Expressed in these two books, it is implied in all the others
-(even in _Salammbo_, which is almost an attempt to escape from it). It
-is not a message; it does not say anything; it is as dumb as Rodin's
-statue; it simply _is_--like _Paradise Lost_ or the _Mona Lisa_ or a
-religion. 'I am the last of the Fathers of the Church.'
-
-
- A NOTE ON DE MAUPASSANT
-
- DE MAUPASSANT for seven years submitted all he wrote to Flaubert's
- criticism. If we add to the preceding essay some sentences from
- Flaubert's correspondence, it will be easy to imagine the lines
- that criticism must have taken, and interesting to compare them
- with the resulting craftsman.
-
- 'I love above all the nervous phrase, substantial, clear, with
- strong muscles and browned skin. I love masculine phrases not
- feminine.
-
- 'What dull stupidity it is always to praise the lie, and to say
- that poetry lives on illusion: as if disillusion were not a hundred
- times more poetic.
-
- 'Find out what is really your nature, and be in harmony with it.
- _Sibi constat_ said Horace. All is there.
-
- 'Work, above all think, condense your thought; you know that
- beautiful fragments are worthless; unity, unity is everything.
-
- 'The author in his work ought to be like God in the Universe,
- present everywhere and visible nowhere.
-
- 'Fine subjects make mediocre works.'
-
- These sentences might well be taken as de Maupassant's inspiration.
- De Maupassant, a man of powerful mind, with Flaubert's example
- before him, makes each of his tales a rounded unity, and a thing
- outside himself, and yet a thing that no one else could have
- written. He shunned fine subjects. His stories are like sections
- of life prepared for examination, and in looking at them we are
- flattered into thinking that we have clearer eyes than usual. He
- chooses some quite ordinary incident, and by working up selected
- details of it, turns it into a story as exciting to the curiosity
- as a detective puzzle. He allows no abstract feminine-phrased
- discourses on the psychology of his characters: he does not take
- advantage of their confessions. Their psychology is manifested in
- things said and in things done. The works, as in life, are hidden
- in the fourth dimension, where we cannot see them.
-
- _La Rendezvous_, a tiny story of seven pages, will illustrate his
- methods. The chosen incident is that of a woman going to see her
- lover, meeting some one else on the way, and going off with him
- instead. That is all. Let us see how de Maupassant works it out.
- Here is his first paragraph:
-
- 'Her hat on her head, her cloak on her back, a black veil across
- her face, another in her pocket, which she would put on over the
- first as soon as she was in the guilty cab, she was tapping the
- point of her boot with the end of her umbrella, and stayed sitting
- in her room, unable to make up her mind to go out to keep the
- appointment.'
-
- The whole of her indecision is expressed before it is explained.
- Then there is a paragraph that lets us know that she had been
- keeping the appointment regularly for two years, and we sympathise
- with her a little. A description of her room follows, made by
- mention of a clock ticking the seconds, a half-read book on a
- rosewood desk, and a perfume. The clock strikes and she goes out,
- lying to the servant. We watch her, loitering on the way, telling
- herself that the Vicomte awaiting her would be opening the window,
- listening at the door, sitting down, getting up, and, since she
- had forbidden him to smoke on the days of her visits, throwing
- desperate glances at the cigarette-box. De Maupassant's characters
- think in pictures of physical action. People do so in real life.
-
- The heroine sits in a square watching children, and reflects,
- always in the concrete, how much the Vicomte is going to bore
- her, and on the terrible danger of rendezvous, and so on, making
- pictures all the time. At last, when she is three-quarters of an
- hour late, she gets up and sets out for his rooms. She has not gone
- ten steps before she meets a diplomatic baron, of whose character
- in her eyes de Maupassant has been careful to let us have a hint
- beforehand. He asks her, after the usual politenesses, to come and
- see his Japanese collections. He is an adroit person this baron.
- He does not make love to her. He laughs at her. He ends, after a
- delightful little dialogue, in half hurrying, half frightening her
- into a cab. They have scarcely started when she cries out that
- she has forgotten that she had promised her husband to invite the
- Vicomte to dinner. They stop at a post office. The baron goes
- in and gets her a telegram card. She writes on it in pencil--it
- would be vandalism to spoil the message by translating it from the
- French--she writes:
-
- 'Mon cher ami, je suis très souffrante; j'ai une névralgie
- atroce qui me tient au lit. Impossible sortir. Venez diner
- demain soir pour que je me fasse pardonner.
-
- JEANNE.'
-
- She licks the edge, closes it carefully, writes the Vicomte's
- address, and then, handing it to the baron, 'Now, will you be so
- good as to drop this in the box for telegrams.'
-
- There de Maupassant ends, without comment of any kind. His stories
- have always 'the look of a gentleman,' and know how to move, when
- to stop, what to put in and what to leave out. They are impersonal,
- but not more impersonal than Mérimée's. There is a man behind them,
- and in contradistinction to the school of writers with whom he has
- been confounded, he does not blink the fact, but obeys Flaubert's
- maxim, allowing his presence to be felt but keeping himself
- invisible. De Maupassant, the pupil of Flaubert, makes even clearer
- than his master the intimate connection between those apparently
- hostile things, Romanticism and Realism. Lesser and coarser minds
- may have needed the stimulus of a revolt when none was; but the
- great men on the heights knew that the suns of dawn and sunset were
- the same.
-
- De Maupassant's position in this book is commensurate neither with
- his genius nor with what I should like to say of him, and hope
- to write in another place. I had wished my book to end with the
- Romantic Movement, and so with Flaubert, who seems to me to mark
- its ultimate development without a change of name. De Maupassant is
- here only to show how direct is the descent of the least exuberant
- of modern story-telling from the Romanticism that made possible
- the work of Chateaubriand, Hugo, or Balzac. His true position is
- in a book that should begin with Flaubert and end with some great
- writer of to-morrow, whose work should show by what alchemy the
- story-telling of to-day will be changed into that of the future.
-
-[Illustration: GUY DE MAUPASSANT]
-
-
-
-
-CONCLUSION
-
-
-
-
-CONCLUSION
-
-
-MY table is covered with a green cloth, and on it, under the lamplight,
-are two bowls of roses. One is full of the rich garden flowers, whose
-hundred folded petals hold in their depths the shadows of their
-colourings--cream, crimson, and the rose and orange of an autumn
-sunset. In the other are three or four wild roses from the hedge on the
-far side of the lane. I scarcely know which give me greater pleasure.
-In comparing them I seem to be setting _Aucassin and Nicolete_ by the
-side of _La Morte Amoureuse_. How many flowers must represent the
-gradual growth of one into the other. How large a collection would be
-necessary to illustrate every stage of the transformation of the simple
-beauty of the wild blossoms into the luxuriant loveliness, majesty, and
-variety of the roses in the opposite bowl. I have attempted such a task
-in this book; not the impossible one of collecting every flower in any
-way different from those that had opened before it, but of bringing
-together a score or so to make the difference between first and last a
-little less tantalising and obscure.
-
-[Genius a stationary quality.]
-
-I had thought I was tracing a progress of the art itself; but I no
-longer think so. Century after century has laid its gift before the
-story-teller, its gift of a form, an unworked vein, a point of view. He
-has learnt to hold us with an episode, and also, evening after evening,
-to keep us interested in the lives of a dozen different people whose
-adventures in the pages of a book he makes no less actual than our
-own. In this last century of the art we have seen men looking back to
-all the ages before them, and bringing into modern story-telling the
-finest qualities of the most ancient, recreating it, and winning for
-it the universal acknowledgment that is given to painting, poetry, or
-music. Much seems to have been done, and yet, who would dare assign to
-a modern story-teller, however excellent a craftsman, a place above
-Boccaccio? Who says that his digressions make old Dan Chaucer out of
-date? Art does not progress but in consciousness of its technique and
-in breadth of power. Genius is a stationary quality. Techniques and the
-conditions of production, qualified the one by the other, and modified
-by genius, move past it side by side, like an endless procession before
-a seated king. The works they carry between them are not to be judged
-by their place in the cavalcade, but by the spirit before whom they
-pass, who wakes from time to time to give them life and meaning.
-
-None the less, there is a kind of imperfect contemporariness in the
-art that lets the finest works of all times remain side by side to
-be imitated or compared. And this power of survival that belongs to
-works of genius accounts for two phenomena, which give genius itself a
-spurious air of progress. The one is an ever clearer consciousness of
-technique, the other an ever wider range of possibilities, both due to
-the increasing number of works of art that are ready for comparison or
-imitation.
-
-[The dissociation of forms.]
-
-In the latter half of my book, and particularly in the chapters on
-Poe, Mérimée, Hawthorne, and Flaubert, we have been partly busied in
-remarking the later stages of self-conscious craftsmanship. There
-remains to be discussed the dissociation of one form from another
-that naturally accompanied this more observant technique. I want to
-distinguish here between the short story, the _nouvelle_, and the
-novel, which are not short, middle-sized, and lengthy specimens of the
-same thing, but forms whose beauties are individual and distinct. They
-demand quite different skills, and few men have excelled in more than
-one of them. Before proceeding to closer definition, let me name an
-example of each, to keep in our minds for purposes of reference while
-considering their several moulds. Balzac's _Père Goriot_ is a novel;
-Gautier's _La Morte Amoureuse_ is a _nouvelle_; de Maupassant's _La
-Petite Ficelle_ is a short story.
-
-[The novel.]
-
-The novel was the first form to be used by men with a clear knowledge
-of what it allowed them to do, and what it expected of them in return.
-Smollett's is its simplest definition. 'A novel,' he says, 'is a large
-diffused picture, comprehending the characters of life, disposed in
-different groups and exhibited in various attitudes, for the purpose
-of a uniform plan and general occurrence, to which every individual
-figure is subservient.' It is, as near as may be, a piece of life,
-and one of its similarities to ordinary existence is perhaps the
-characteristic that best marks its difference from the _nouvelle_. The
-novel contains at least one counterplot, the _nouvelle_ none. Life has
-as many counterplots as it has actors, as many heroes and heroines as
-play any part in it at all. No man is a hero to his valet, because in
-that particular plot the valet happens to be a hero to himself. The
-novelist does not attempt so equable a characterisation, but by telling
-the adventures of more than one group of people, and by threading
-their tales in and out through each other, he contrives to give a
-conventional semblance of the intricate story-telling of life.[10]
-
-[The _nouvelle_.]
-
-The _nouvelle_ is a novel without a counterplot, and on a smaller
-scale.[11] The latter quality is dependent on the former, since it
-combats the difficulty of sustained attention, that the novel avoids
-by continual change from one to another of its parallel stories. The
-_nouvelle_ was with Boccaccio little more than a plot made actual by
-the more important sentences of dialogue, and by concise sketching
-of its principal scenes. It has now grown to be a most delicate and
-delightful form, without breathlessness and without compression, its
-aim of pure story being implicit in the manner of its telling. It is
-differentiated from the short story, the advantage of whose brevity it
-shares in a lesser degree, by the separate importance of its scenes,
-which are not bound to be subjected so absolutely to its conclusion.
-For example, the splendid cathedral scene in _La Morte Amoureuse_,
-where, at the moment of ordination, a young priest is stricken with
-passion for a courtesan, would be unjustifiable in a short story unless
-it ended in the climax of the tale. The priest would have to die on
-the steps of the altar, or the woman to kill herself at his feet as he
-passed, a vowed celebate, down the cathedral aisle. The short story
-must be a single melody ending with itself; the _nouvelle_ a piece of
-music, the motive of whose opening bars, recurring again and again
-throughout, is finally repeated with the increase in meaning that is
-given it by the whole performance.
-
-[The short story.]
-
-The short story proper is in narrative prose what the short lyric is
-in poetry. It is an episode, an event, a scene, a sentence, whose
-importance is such that it allows nothing in the story that is not
-directly concerned with its realisation. This is true of many specimens
-of the _nouvelle_, but it is the essential rule of the short story.
-Look at the end of _La Petite Ficelle_, or of any other of the _Contes_
-of de Maupassant. 'Une 'tite ficelle ... une 'tite ficelle ... t'nez
-la, voila, m'sieu le Maire.' 'A little bit of string ... a little bit
-of string ... look, there it is, M. le Maire.' That sentence, repeated
-by the dying man in his delirium, needs for the full pathos of its
-effect every word of the story. From the first paragraph about an
-ordinary market day, the accident of the old man picking up a piece of
-string in a place where a purse had been lost, the false accusation,
-and his guilt-seeming protestation of innocence, every detail in the
-story is worked just so far as to make the reader's mind as ready and
-sensitive as possible for the final infliction of those few words.
-Keats once coated the inside of his mouth with cayenne pepper to feel
-as keenly as he could 'the delicious coolness of claret.' The art
-of the short story is just such a making ready for such a momentary
-sensation.
-
-[The possibilities of narrative.]
-
-Just as Time, with the clearer consciousness of technique, has made the
-moulds of the art more markedly distinct, so it has given the artist
-an infinite choice of amalgams with which to fill them. Although some
-of the most delightful examples of narrative are still produced with
-the old and worthy object of telling a tale to pass the time, although
-there are still men who lay their mats upon the ground, squat down on
-them, and keep their audiences happy by stories that demand no more
-intellectual attention than the buzz of bees in the magnolia flowers;
-yet, if we consider only those artists who have been discussed in
-the preceding chapters, we perceive at once how many are the other
-possibilities of narrative, and, if we examine the story-telling
-of our own day, we shall find that most of them are illustrated in
-contemporary practice.
-
-Story-telling has grown into a means of expression with a gamut as
-wide as that of poetry, which is as wide as that of humanity. 'It is
-literature,' says Wilde, 'that shows us the body in its swiftness and
-the soul in its unrest'; and the same art that helps us to laze away
-a summer afternoon is a key that lets us into the hearts of men we
-have never seen, and not infrequently opens our own to us, when, in
-the bustle of existence, we have gone out and found ourselves unable
-to return. It is a Gyges' ring with which, upon our finger, we can go
-about the world and mingle in the business of men to whom we would not
-bow, or who would not bow to us. It breaks the gold or iron collars of
-our classes and sets each man free as a man to understand all other men
-soever. It opens our eyes like Shelley's to see that life--
-
- 'like a dome of many-coloured glass,
- Stains the white radiance of eternity.'
-
-We become conscious of that radiance when, by this art made free of
-time, we can dream the dreams of the Pharaohs, pray with the hermits
-in the Thebaid, and send our hazardous guesses like seeking dogs into
-the dim forests of futurity. Our eyes may fitly shine, and we become
-as little children in brief resting-hours out of the grown-up world,
-when this art makes those tints ours that we never knew, and sends us,
-divested of our monotones, to choose among all the glittering colours
-of mankind.
-
-And if we are not listeners only, but have ourselves something to
-fit with wings and to send out to find those men who will know the
-whispering sound of its flight and take it to themselves, how much do
-we not owe to this most manifold art of story-telling?
-
-There is nothing that its pinions will not bear.
-
-
-
-
-INDEX
-
-
-ABERCROMBIE, Lascelles, 263.
-
-Addison, Joseph, 110, 113 _et seq._
-
-_Ali Baba_, 89.
-
-_Amadis of Gaul_, 52, 97.
-
-_Anatomy of Melancholy, The_, 125.
-
-Apuleius, 125.
-
-_Arabian Nights, The_, 46, 100, 101, 231.
-
-_Arcadia_, The Duchess of Pembroke's, 78, 83 _et seq._, 196.
-
-_Arria Marcella_, 283.
-
-_Astrée, l'_, 85.
-
-_Atala_, 179 _et seq._
-
-_Aucassin and Nicolete_, 11, 14, 15, 249, 305.
-
-
-BACON, Sir Francis, 112.
-
-Balzac, Honoré de, 188, 192, 206, 212, 217 _et seq._, 238, 288, 290,
-292, 293, 301, 307.
-
-Barye, Antoine Louis, 180, 202.
-
-Baudelaire, Charles, 239.
-
-Beardsley Aubrey, 88.
-
-Behn, Mrs. Aphra, 70, 139.
-
-Beowulf, 9.
-
-_Bergers d'Arcadie, Les_, 87.
-
-Bible, The, 128.
-
-_Bickerstaff, Mr._, 19, 113 _et seq._
-
-Boccaccio, Giovanni, 19, 20 _et seq._, 56, 82, 85, 125, 155, 225, 306,
-309.
-
-Boigne, Mme. de, 275.
-
-Boileau, Nicolas B.-Despreaux, 62.
-
-Borrow, George, 59.
-
-Botticelli, 25.
-
-_Bouvard et Pécuchet_, 296, 297, 298.
-
-Brantôme, 278.
-
-Browne, Sir Thomas, 252.
-
-Bunyan, John, 126 _et seq._, 140, 155, 257.
-
-Burleigh, Lord, 74.
-
-Burney, Fanny, 107, 112, 115, 119, 147 _et seq._
-
-Burns, Robert, 193.
-
-Burton, Robert, 125, 132, 134.
-
-Byron, Lord, 176, 202.
-
-
-_Caleb Williams_, 244, 245.
-
-_Canterbury Tales, The_, 37 _et seq._
-
-_Captain Singleton_, 58.
-
-_Caractères_, La Bruyère's, 110.
-
-_Castle of Otranto, The_, 189.
-
-Cellini, Benvenuto, 157.
-
-_Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles, Les_, 46.
-
-Cervantes, Miguel de C. Saavedra, 32, 60, 61, 78, 82, 85, 86, 93 _et
-seq._, 126, 158, 162, 192, 257.
-
-_Characters_, Sir Thomas Overbury's, 107 _et seq._
-
-Charlemagne, 8, 9, 32, 52.
-
-Chateaubriand, François René de, 175 _et seq._, 202, 208, 291, 301.
-
-Chatterton, Thomas, 190.
-
-Chaucer, Geoffrey, 19, 20, 21, 31 _et seq._, 107, 155, 156, 218, 306.
-
-_Cinderella_, 89.
-
-_Citizen of the World, The_, 148, 231.
-
-_Clarissa Harlowe_, 140 _et seq._
-
-Clopinel, Jean, 21 _et seq._
-
-Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, 42.
-
-_Colomba_, 275.
-
-_Comédie Humaine, La_, 217 _et seq._, 292.
-
-Congreve, William, 274.
-
-_Contes Drôlatiques, Les_, 222.
-
-Corelli, Miss, 25.
-
-_Cranford_, 118, 168.
-
-Cromwell, Oliver, 126.
-
-_Cromwell_, 206.
-
-
-_Dance of Death, The_, 262.
-
-Dante, 155, 202.
-
-_Decameron, The_, 19, 37 _et seq._, 156.
-
-Defoe, Daniel, 114, 132 _et seq._, 140, 155.
-
-Delacroix, Eugène, 202.
-
-De Quincey, Thomas, 120.
-
-Desvergnes, 26.
-
-_Diana_, 85.
-
-Dickens, Charles, 58.
-
-_Don Quixote_, 10, 60, 82, 96 _et seq._, 158, 161, 257.
-
-_Dream Children_, 120.
-
-Dumas, Alexandre, 177, 188, 193, 201, 205, 206, 210 _et seq._, 261, 274.
-
-
-EARLE, John, 109, 110, 111.
-
-Edgeworth, Maria, 192, 217.
-
-_Éducation Sentimentale, l'_, 294.
-
-Edward III., 39.
-
-_Elia_, 258.
-
-Ellis, F. S., 22.
-
-_Émaux et Camées_, 238.
-
-Emerson, Ralph Waldo, 259.
-
-_Emma_, 151.
-
-_Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, An_, 244.
-
-_Ethan Brand_, 263.
-
-Euclid, 144, 146, 253.
-
-_Eugénie Grandet_, 222, 225, 228.
-
-_Euphues_, 67, 70 _et seq._, 139.
-
-_Evelina_, 147 _et seq._, 168.
-
-_Exemplary Novels, The_, 46, 94, 99, 101, 102, 126.
-
-
-_Facino Cane_, 227.
-
-_Faërie Queene, The_, 126, 128, 132.
-
-_Femme au Collier de Velours, La_, 201.
-
-_Ferdinand Count, Fathom_, 165.
-
-Fiametta, 85.
-
-Fielding, Henry, 71, 96, 107, 119, 147, 150, 152, 156 _et seq._, 187,
-227, 235, 257, 293.
-
-_Figaro, Le_, 238.
-
-Flaubert, Gustave, 46, 133, 184, 195, 226, 287 _et seq._, 307.
-
-Froissart, 191.
-
-
-_Galatea_, 62, 78, 85, 94, 95, 98, 103.
-
-Gautier, Théophile, 88, 177, 195, 202, 203, 205, 206, 208, 217, 221,
-231 _et seq._, 251, 273, 277, 283, 288, 291, 307.
-
-Gavin, Miss J., 102.
-
-Gay, John, 42.
-
-_Génie du Christianisme, Le_, 182.
-
-_Gesta Romanorum, The_, 20, 34 _et seq._, 45, 128.
-
-_Gil Blas_, 61, 62, 63, 161.
-
-Godwin, William, 244 _et seq._
-
-Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von, 175, 232.
-
-Goldsmith, Oliver, 42, 118 _et seq._, 148, 231.
-
-Goya, Francisco Jose de G. y Lucientes, 262, 269.
-
-_Grace Abounding_, 130.
-
-Graham, R. B. Cunninghame, 121.
-
-_Grammont Memoirs, The_, 278.
-
-Greene, Robert, 67, 74, 126, 140.
-
-_Griselda_, 46.
-
-_Guardian, The_, 112.
-
-Guest, Lady Charlotte, 13.
-
-
-HAMILTON, Anthony, 278.
-
-_Hardyknute, The Ballad of_, 191.
-
-Hawthorne, Nathaniel, 134, 245, 257 _et seq._, 274, 283, 307, 308.
-
-Hazlitt, William, 84, 111, 128, 193, 244, 245, 258, 273, 274, 278.
-
-_Heptameron, The_, 51.
-
-_Hernani_, 201, 205.
-
-_Hérodias_, 296.
-
-_Histoire mes de Bêtes, l'_, 193.
-
-Hoffmann, Ernst Theodor Wilhelm, 201, 225.
-
-Hogarth, William, 156, 168.
-
-Holbein, Hans, 262.
-
-Holcroft, Thomas, 278.
-
-Homer, 208.
-
-Hosea, 128.
-
-_House of the Seven Gables, The_, 263.
-
-Hugo, Victor, 177, 183, 201, 203 _et seq._, 277, 295, 301.
-
-_Humphry Clinker_, 51, 117, 147, 166 _et seq._
-
-Hunt, Leigh, 119.
-
-
-_Ivanhoe_, 196, 211.
-
-
-_Jack Wilton_, or _The Unfortunate Traveller_, 60, 76.
-
-_John Arnolfini and his Wife_, 41.
-
-Johnson, Samuel, 118, 144, 175.
-
-_Jonathan Wild_, 163 _et seq._
-
-Jonson, Ben, 109.
-
-_Joseph Andrews_, 156 _et seq._
-
-_Journal of the Plague Year, A_, 134.
-
-_Julie_, or _La Nouvelle Héloïse_, 147, 177.
-
-
-KEATS, John, 42, 274, 310.
-
-_King Lear_, 228.
-
-Kit Kats, The, 115.
-
-
-LA BRUYÈRE, Jean de, 63, 110, 111.
-
-Lafontaine, Jean de, 42.
-
-Lamb, Charles, 120, 133, 258, 260.
-
-Lancret, Nicolas, 86.
-
-_Lavengro_, 58, 59.
-
-_Lazarillo de Tormes_, 51 _et seq._
-
-_Lenore_, 251.
-
-Leonardo da Vinci, 243, 248.
-
-Le Sage, Alain René, 61 _et seq._, 160.
-
-Lewis, Matthew Gregory, 166.
-
-Lockhart, John Gibson, 101.
-
-Lodge, Thomas, 73 _et seq._, 126.
-
-Lorris, Guillaume de, 23.
-
-_Love for Love_, 149.
-
-Luna, H. de, 56.
-
-Lyly, John, 70 _et seq._, 90, 139, 280.
-
-
-MABBE, James, 126.
-
-_Mabinogion, The_, 9, 11 _et seq._, 51, 73, 240.
-
-Macpherson, James, 191.
-
-_Madame Bovary_, 291 _et seq._
-
-_Mademoiselle de Maupin_, 237.
-
-Mahomet, 240.
-
-Malory, Sir Thomas, 11, 61, 88.
-
-_Manon Lescaut_, 147.
-
-Margaret, Queen of Navarre, 51.
-
-_Markheim_, 263.
-
-Marot, Clément, 21, 156.
-
-Masefield, John, 61.
-
-_Masque of the Red Death, The_, 247.
-
-_Mateo Falcone_, 277.
-
-Maupassant, Guy de, 226, 235, 247, 291, 292, 298 _et seq._, 307.
-
-Mérimée, Prosper, 46, 195, 203, 205, 206, 273 _et seq._, 292, 301, 307.
-
-_Messe de l'Athée, La_, 225.
-
-Meung, Jean de, 21 _et seq._, 31.
-
-_Microcosmography, A_, 111.
-
-Milton, John, 42.
-
-_Misérables, Les_, 207.
-
-_Modest Proposal, A_, 277.
-
-Molière, Jean Baptiste Poquelin de, 61.
-
-_Monk and Witch_, 262.
-
-_Mona Lisa_, 249, 298.
-
-Montaigne, Michel Eyquem Sieur de, 73, 112, 120, 208.
-
-Montemôr, Jorge de, 85.
-
-Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, Baron de, 208.
-
-_Morte Amoureuse, La_, 305, 307, 309.
-
-_Morte Darthur, The_, 8, 11, 32, 37, 51, 61, 240.
-
-_Mrs. Battle's Opinions on Whist_, 120.
-
-_Murders in the Rue Morgue, The_, 248.
-
-_Mystery of Marie Roget, The_, 248.
-
-
-NAPLES, Queen Joan of, 47.
-
-Nash, Thomas, 60, 76.
-
-Nevinson, H. W., 88.
-
-_Newgate Calendar, The_, 132.
-
-_New Testament, The_, 144.
-
-_Northanger Abbey_, 189.
-
-Northcote, James, 278.
-
-_Notre Dame de Paris_, 204, 207.
-
-_Nouvelle Héloïse, La_, or _Julie_, 147, 177.
-
-
-ODIN, 8.
-
-_Old Gentleman, The_, 119.
-
-_Old Lady, The_, 120.
-
-_Oliver Twist_, 58.
-
-_Ossian_, 178, 179, 191.
-
-_Oval Portrait, The_, 250.
-
-Overbury, Sir Thomas, 108, 109, 110, 111.
-
-
-_Pamela_, 140 _et seq._, 157.
-
-_Pandosto_, 75, 76.
-
-_Paradise Lost_, 298.
-
-Pascal, 208.
-
-Pater, Walter, 121.
-
-_Paynter's Pallace_, 68.
-
-Peacock, Thomas Love, 196.
-
-_Penseur, Le_, 297.
-
-Pepys, Samuel, 129.
-
-_Percy and Duglas_, 84.
-
-Percy, Bishop, 191.
-
-_Père Goriot_, 228, 307.
-
-_Petite Ficelle, La_, 307, 310.
-
-_Petite Pallace of Petite his Pleasure, A_, 68 _et seq._
-
-Petrarch, 38.
-
-Pettie, George, 68, 69, 126.
-
-_Philosophy of Composition, The_, 244, 246.
-
-_Pilgrim's Progress_, 126 _et seq._, 257.
-
-Pindar, 84.
-
-Pippin, 8.
-
-Pisan, Christine de, 25.
-
-_Plea of Pan, The_, 88.
-
-Poe, Edgar Allan, 46, 165, 195, 220, 243 _et seq._, 258, 259, 263, 281,
-307.
-
-Poussin, Nicolas, 86, 87.
-
-_Presse, La_, 238.
-
-Prévost, l'Abbé, 147.
-
-_Punch and Judy_, 96.
-
-_Purloined Letter, The_, 248.
-
-
-_Quentin Durward_, 208.
-
-
-RABELAIS, François, 25, 96, 170, 208.
-
-Radcliffe, Mrs., 166.
-
-_Rappacini's Daughter_, 265.
-
-_Raven, The_, 244, 253.
-
-_Reliques of Ancient English Poetry, The_, 191, 218.
-
-_Rendezvous, Le_, 299.
-
-_René_, 179.
-
-_Reynard the Fox_, 9, 54.
-
-Reynolds, Sir Joshua, 243.
-
-Richardson, Samuel, 71; 139 _et seq._, 155, 156, 157, 158, 167, 235.
-
-_Robert the Devil, The Life of_, 19.
-
-_Robinson Crusoe_, 114, 132.
-
-_Rob Roy_, 192.
-
-_Roderick Random_, 58, 160 _et seq._
-
-Rodin, Auguste, 297.
-
-_Romance of the Rose, The_, 19 _et seq._, 132.
-
-_Roman Comique, Le_, 158.
-
-_Roman de la Momie, Le_, 236.
-
-_Romany Rye, The_, 59.
-
-Ronsard, Pierre de, 21, 155, 158.
-
-_Rosalynde_, 73, 75, 77, 78.
-
-Rossetti, Dante Gabriel, 42, 44.
-
-Rousseau, Jean Jacques, 147, 175, 177, 178, 179, 180.
-
-
-SAINTE-BEUVE, Charles Augustin de, 208.
-
-_St. Julien l'Hospitalier_, 291, 296.
-
-_Salammbo_, 291, 294, 295, 298.
-
-Santayana, George, 239.
-
-Scarlatti, Alessandro, 196.
-
-_Scarlet Letter, The_, 258, 266.
-
-Scarron, Paul, 86, 170.
-
-Schopenhauer, Arthur, 25.
-
-Scott, Sir Walter, 42, 101, 187 _et seq._, 206, 208, 210, 211, 212,
-217, 218, 219, 251.
-
-Selkirk, Alexander, 134.
-
-_Sense and Sensibility_, 150.
-
-Shakespeare, William, 78, 96, 126, 155, 202.
-
-Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 311.
-
-Sidney, Sir Philip, 78, 83 _et seq._, 95, 140, 175, 191, 233.
-
-_Sir Charles Grandison_, 140.
-
-_Sir Roger de Coverley_, 117 _et seq._
-
-Smollett, Tobias, 58, 71, 107, 119, 147, 150, 152, 156 _et seq._, 187,
-261, 293, 308.
-
-Somerset, The Countess of, 108.
-
-Somerset, The Earl of, 108.
-
-_Song of Roland, The_, 37.
-
-_Spectator, The_, 112, 116, 117, 142, 148, 168.
-
-Spenser, Edmund, 42, 126, 128.
-
-Steele, Sir Richard, 113 _et seq._, 142, 148.
-
-Stendhal, Henri Beyle who wrote as, 131, 261.
-
-Sterne, Laurence, 169, 170.
-
-Stevenson, Robert Louis, 243, 250.
-
-_Summer is icumen in_, 15.
-
-Swift, Dean, 113.
-
-Swinburne, Algernon Charles, 71.
-
-
-_Table Talk_, 258.
-
-Taine, Hippolyte, 23, 278.
-
-_Tatler, The_, 112, 113, 142, 148, 168.
-
-Tennyson, Alfred, Lord, 42.
-
-_Tentation de Saint Antoine, La_, 296, 297, 298.
-
-Theocritus, 81.
-
-Theophrastus, 63, 107, 110, 111.
-
-Thomson, Hugh, 118.
-
-Thoreau, Henry David, 258.
-
-Tolstoy, Leo, Count, 261.
-
-_Tom Jones_, 51, 58, 89, 144, 166, 257.
-
-_Tristram Shandy_, 169, 170.
-
-_Troilus and Criseyd_, 38, 47.
-
-_Trois Contes_, 295.
-
-_Trois Mousquetaires, Les_, 211, 212.
-
-_Tulipe Noire, La_, 211.
-
-
-_Un Cœur Simple_, 291, 295.
-
-Urfé, Honoré d', 85.
-
-
-VAN EYCK, Jan and Hubert, 41, 42.
-
-_Vathek_, 231.
-
-_Venus d'Ille, La_, 283.
-
-_Vicar of Wakefield, The_, 86, 118, 119.
-
-_Vingt Ans Après_, 212.
-
-Virgil, 81, 86.
-
-_Volsunga Saga, The_, 11, 240.
-
-Voltaire, 202, 231, 274, 296, 297.
-
-
-WAGNER, Wilhelm Richard, 196.
-
-Walpole, Horace, 189.
-
-Watteau Antoine, 61, 86.
-
-_Waverley Novels, The_, 42, 187 _et seq._, 209.
-
-Wilde, Oscar, 311.
-
-_William Wilson_, 250.
-
-Wordsworth, William, 42.
-
-
-YEATS, William Butler, 236.
-
-_Young Goodman Brown_, 267, 268.
-
-
-ZOLA, Emile, 226.
-
-
-Printed by T. and A. CONSTABLE, Printers to His Majesty at the
-Edinburgh University Press
-
-
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
-[1] Translation by Lady Charlotte Guest, 1838.
-
-[2] The quotations in this chapter are from the translation by Mr. F.
-S. Ellis.
-
-[3] It would be possible to trace an interesting history of narrative
-in verse from Chaucer to our own day. But although the names of
-Spenser, Milton, Lafontaine, Gay, Goldsmith, Keats, Coleridge,
-Wordsworth, Tennyson, Rossetti, which with many others come instantly
-to mind, show how various and suggestive such an essay might be, yet
-the purpose of this book would hardly be served by its inclusion. It
-would be more nearly concerned with the history of poetry than with
-that of story-telling.
-
-[4] By H. de Luna, 1620. The earliest known edition of _Lazarillo_ was
-published in 1553.
-
-[5] From a poem by John Masefield.
-
-[6] There is another picture of the same name and subject in the Duke
-of Devonshire's collection.
-
-[7] It is worth noticing as an additional proof of the close connection
-between the story in letters and the feminine novel that _Sense and
-Sensibility_ was built out of an older tale that she actually wrote in
-epistolary form.
-
-[8] From a poem by Lascelles Abercrombie.
-
-[9] This is repeated with a new purpose from the chapter on Origins.
-
-[10] The distinction between novel and romance made in the chapter on
-Hawthorne is one of material rather than of form. It is possible to use
-the material of romance in the form of either novel, _nouvelle_, or
-short story.
-
-[11] The novelette is not the same as the _nouvelle_, but simply a
-short novel as its name implies.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-End of Project Gutenberg's A History of Story-telling, by Arthur Ransome
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A HISTORY OF STORY-TELLING ***
-
-***** This file should be named 62129-0.txt or 62129-0.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/6/2/1/2/62129/
-
-Produced by MFR, Eleni Christofaki and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This
-file was produced from images generously made available
-by The Internet Archive)
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
-specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
-eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
-for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
-performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
-away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
-not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
-trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country outside the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
- are located before using this ebook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
-Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
-mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
-volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
-locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
-Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
-date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
-official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
-
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-