diff options
| author | nfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org> | 2025-01-27 07:07:50 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | nfenwick <nfenwick@pglaf.org> | 2025-01-27 07:07:50 -0800 |
| commit | 8d85b8c3a7cb9f26dfd48098f3afb0d904d3a6fb (patch) | |
| tree | d8f087fb64e3e4daf7b14533da8d4800ce9cfe07 /old | |
| parent | 5886b1227343a1afbcea1f0f89af6f9421079e85 (diff) | |
Diffstat (limited to 'old')
| -rw-r--r-- | old/60026-0.txt | 4006 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/60026-0.zip | bin | 53434 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/60026-h.zip | bin | 238166 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/60026-h/60026-h.htm | 5005 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/60026-h/images/cover.jpg | bin | 151374 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/60026-h/images/title.jpg | bin | 78392 -> 0 bytes |
6 files changed, 0 insertions, 9011 deletions
diff --git a/old/60026-0.txt b/old/60026-0.txt deleted file mode 100644 index e625bdc..0000000 --- a/old/60026-0.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4006 +0,0 @@ -The Project Gutenberg EBook of Wars & Treaties, 1815-1914, by Arthur Ponsonby - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and -most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions -whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms -of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at -www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll -have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using -this ebook. - - - -Title: Wars & Treaties, 1815-1914 - -Author: Arthur Ponsonby - -Release Date: July 31, 2019 [EBook #60026] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: UTF-8 - -*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WARS & TREATIES, 1815-1914 *** - - - - -Produced by Turgut Dincer, Charlie Howard, and the Online -Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This -file was produced from images generously made available -by The Internet Archive) - - - - - - - - - -WARS AND TREATIES - -1815 to 1914 - - - - -DEMOCRACY AND DIPLOMACY - -(3s. 6d. net) - -BY - -ARTHUR PONSONBY - - -“It is the completest statement of the case for the democratic control -of foreign affairs which has been published, and contains a mass of -facts whose value cannot be exaggerated. We owe Mr. Ponsonby a great -debt for this work.”--_Labour Leader._ - -“... Mr. Ponsonby’s main contention is one which may and should receive -the hearty assent of many who disagree with him in detail. He strongly -urges the necessity in dealing with foreign affairs of ensuring the -co-operation and approval of the great mass of the people. He is -manifestly quite right.”--The late LORD CROMER in The _Spectator_. - - -REBELS AND REFORMERS - -(6s. net) - -BY - -ARTHUR & DOROTHEA PONSONBY - -Savonarola--William the Silent--Tycho Brahe--Cervantes--Giordano -Bruno--Grotius--Voltaire--Hans Andersen--Mazzini--W. Lloyd -Garrison--Thoreau--Tolstoy - - -“Mr. and Mrs. Ponsonby’s book is intended for children or for those -who are too busy to read books in many volumes. But the interest of -it lies not in the necessarily short and simple narratives giving the -story rather than the ideas, although these are done clearly and with -spirit, but in the reflections which lie about those stories and lodge -here and there in the reader’s mind. Like all books worth reading this -one is the outcome of a mass of judgments and beliefs which may be -very briefly expressed in the work itself, but lend it the gift which -in the case of human beings we call personality.”--_The Times Literary -Supplement._ - -“The story of these twelve lives is told in these pages--and told with -a most enticing simplicity and the happiest taste--in the hope of -redressing the balance between men of action and men of thought, and of -showing that this type of character and achievement can be made just as -interesting to the young as the more conventional hero of the history -book.... This book is more especially for the young, but it will be a -delight also to grown-up readers.”--_The Nation._ - -“The biographies are always well simplified and written in a clear -and pointed way. They are accompanied by portraits, which add not a -little to the work’s attractiveness as a book unusually well fitted to -the needs of young readers who are beginning to take an interest in -history.”--_The Scotsman._ - - - - - WARS & TREATIES - - 1815 to 1914 - - BY - ARTHUR PONSONBY - - [Illustration] - - LONDON: GEORGE ALLEN & UNWIN LTD. - RUSKIN HOUSE 40 MUSEUM STREET, W.C. 1 - NEW YORK THE MACMILLAN COMPANY - - - - - _First published_ _April 1918_ - - _Reprinted_ _June 1918_ - - _Third Edition, revised and enlarged_ _January 1919_ - - -(_All rights reserved_) - - - - -CONTENTS - - - PAGE - INTRODUCTION 7 - YEAR - 1821–1828 GREEK WAR 14 - - 1828–1829 RUSSO-TURKISH WAR 16 - - 1830–1839 WAR BETWEEN HOLLAND AND BELGIUM 18 - - 1830–1839 WAR IN PORTUGAL AND SPAIN 20 - - 1831 RUSSIAN CAMPAIGN IN POLAND 22 - - 1832–1841 TURKO-EGYPTIAN WAR 24 - - 1838–1842 FIRST AFGHAN WAR 26 - - 1840–1842 OPIUM WAR IN CHINA 28 - - 1846–1848 AMERICAN WAR WITH MEXICO 30 - - 1848–1849 AUSTRO-HUNGARIAN WAR 32 - - 1831 } - } - 1848–1849 } - } ITALIAN WAR OF LIBERATION 34 - 1859 } - } - 1866–1867 } - - 1854–1856 CRIMEAN WAR 36 - - 1857–1858 INDIAN MUTINY 38 - - 1857–1860 CHINESE WAR 40 - - 1861–1865 AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 42 - - 1862–1867 FRENCH EXPEDITION IN MEXICO 44 - - 1864–1870 BRAZILIAN WAR 46 - - 1864 DANISH WAR 48 - - 1866 AUSTRO-PRUSSIAN WAR 50 - - 1867–1868 BRITISH EXPEDITION IN ABYSSINIA 52 - - 1870–1871 FRANCO-GERMAN WAR 54 - - 1873–1874 THE ASHANTI WAR 56 - - 1877–1878 RUSSO-TURKISH WAR 58 - - 1878–1881 SECOND AFGHAN WAR 60 - - 1879 ZULU WAR 62 - - 1879–1882 THE CHILE-PERUVIAN WAR 64 - - 1881 FRENCH EXPEDITION IN TUNIS 66 - - 1882 EGYPTIAN WAR 68 - - 1884–1885 FRANCO-CHINESE WAR 70 - - 1823–1826 } - } - 1851 } BURMESE WARS 72 - } - 1885 } - - 1885 SERBO-BULGARIAN WAR 74 - - 1894–1895 CHINO-JAPANESE WAR 76 - - 1895–1896 ITALO-ABYSSINIAN WAR 78 - - 1896–1898 WAR IN THE SOUDAN 80 - - 1897 TURKO-GREEK WAR 82 - - 1897–1898 SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR 84 - - 1881 } - } THE BOER WARS 86 - 1899–1902 } - - 1899–1900 BOXER RISING IN CHINA 88 - - 1904–1905 RUSSO-JAPANESE WAR 90 - - 1911–1912 TURKO-ITALIAN WAR 92 - - 1912–1913 FIRST BALKAN WAR 94 - - 1913 SECOND BALKAN WAR 96 - - - IMPORTANT TREATIES 98 - - INDEX OF TREATIES 102 - - BIBLIOGRAPHY 104 - - - - -WARS AND TREATIES - -1815–1914 - - - - -INTRODUCTION - - -A growing number of people are devoting their attention to a closer -study of foreign affairs. Many of them may not have the opportunity to -read the larger volumes of histories; and, indeed, even if they had, -they would find their choice of books very much restricted when they -came to the more recent period of European and world history, although -in the last year or so the gap has to some extent been filled up by -several interesting studies of international politics in the nineteenth -century. Some knowledge of this period is essential if we are to -understand the full significance of the events of to-day, and if we are -to form any helpful opinion of the course to be pursued in future. - -Historians often take for granted that their readers already have some -general knowledge of the groundwork of events and they build up their -structure of criticism, their delineation of policy and tendencies, -and their survey of international problems on the assumption that the -scaffolding has been erected. But often it has not, and then history, -more especially the complex tangle of international history, becomes -difficult to grasp. It may therefore serve some useful purpose if a few -poles of scaffolding representing the dates and outline of conflicts -and agreements between nations can be supplied in a very brief and -easily intelligible form, a presentment of the bare record of facts -which may be useful for reference. - -During the last hundred years war has been a more common occurrence -in international intercourse than most people realize. The forty-two -records of wars tabled in these pages do not cover the whole ground. -They are the chief conflicts, or the conflicts fraught with the most -serious consequences, but they are by no means the only occasions on -which there was fighting in the world. Revolutions, unless they led -to international war, are not mentioned, neither are expeditions such -as the advance on Llassa, the Chitral expedition, the Indian frontier -wars, the Kaffir wars, the Somaliland expeditions, the revolt of the -Herreroes in German West Africa or the French expeditions in Morocco: -the wars between the states of South America, with two exceptions, have -also been omitted. But the list as it stands, is striking enough and -may suffice to make the student inquire further into the circumstances -which produced this almost unceasing strife. - -The causes are epitomized in the fewest possible words and the occasion -is separated from the cause. Causes of wars are very seldom remembered -and are not very easily discovered in the perusal of histories. The -occasion is sometimes mistaken for the cause, whereas it may often be -merely a pretext. The occasion of a war has not infrequently been a -comparatively trivial incident, whereas the cause can be traced to the -gradual development of friction for which divergence of policies or -conflict of ambitions may have been responsible. The trivial incident, -or even an incident of a more serious nature, may pass off without -fatal consequences if no friction exists between the nations and there -is a general atmosphere of amicable understanding. Where, on the -contrary, relations are strained it requires but a very small spark -to light up a conflagration. It is important therefore to detach the -occasion from the cause. - -Causes of war in the nineteenth century differ to some extent from -those of previous centuries. The elemental combative passion of man -expressing itself in fierce racial animosities is far less noticeable. -Religious differences do not figure so positively as a reason for -conflict. Dynastic ambitions linger on and still play a formidable -part, even after 1815, but not with the same unashamed and aggressive -arrogance as in bygone centuries. Nationalist aspirations begin -to assert themselves, and the waves of revolutionary exasperation -with outworn systems of despotic government have made those very -governments combat that spirit by force of arms. As the century -proceeds, and the wonderful inventions for rapid transit and -communication develop, the most noticeable element in war-making is -the commercial or colonial ambition of governments fostered largely -by the pressure of financial interests and declaring itself under the -name of Empire. This policy of competitive imperial expansion in the -newly accessible regions of the globe will be found to constitute the -most frequent cause of dispute, of jealousy, and of suspicion between -nations. The pretext will vary, the excuse will be presented under -plausible guises for popular consumption, but the ultimate cause, the -fundamental origin will be the same. Imperialism economic in its origin -is fostered largely by an exaggerated spirit of nationalism. - -The remarkable extent of Empire expansion in the latter part of the -nineteenth century is best illustrated by the following figures:-- - - -_Acquisitions of Territory_ - - To the British Empire 1870–1900: 4,754,000 square miles; - 88,000,000 population. - - To France 1884–1900: 3,583,580 square miles; 36,553,000 - population. - - To Germany 1884–1900: 1,026,220 square miles; 16,687,100 - population. - -But perhaps the chief and most frequent cause of war is war itself. In -the Balkan Peninsula--where, whenever the fighting has ceased, nothing -approaching a satisfactory settlement has ever been concluded--this is -specially true. Eight or nine of the wars recorded concern the Balkans. -Or take the Crimean War. Sir Spencer Walpole says: - -“From 1856 to 1878 the Continent of Europe was afflicted with five -great wars--the Franco-Austrian War of 1859; the Danish of 1864; -the Austro-Prussian of 1860; the Franco-German of 1870 and the -Russo-Turkish of 1878: all of which can be lineally traced to the war -of 1854,” and one at least of those wars, as we know, sowed the seeds -of future war. The war that is concluded by a dictated peace, the war -that leaves a sense of grievance and unsatisfied though legitimate -claims, the war that inspires a lasting desire for revenge inevitably -leads to future war. Wars are never aggressive but always defensive on -the part of those who are responsible for waging them. Wars are never -defensive but always aggressive on the part of those against whom they -are waged. The Ministers and monarchs do the quarrelling, the people -believe the version they are told and obey. The people do the fighting -and make the sacrifice, the Ministers and monarchs do the treaty-making -without consulting them. The people’s part is one of valiance, -endurance, and suffering; the part of the Ministers and monarchs is one -too often marred by failure and frequently disfigured by intrigue and -deception. - -Cast your eye through these forty-two very brief records of wars. Think -of the valour, the determination, and the heroism of the people, be -they soldiers or civilians. Consider the noble part played by those -who without question obeyed what they were led to believe was their -country’s call. And then look on the other side at the results--the -ineptitude of the statesmen, the patched-up treaties, the worthless -agreements, the wars that led to further wars, the failure to secure -a settlement after the soldier had done his part, and the unnecessary -prolongation of conflicts when agreement might have been reached by the -exercise of a little wisdom and foresight. The contrast is remarkable -between the actions on the battlefield and the intrigue in the council -chamber. Blood has been spilt, lives lost, and victories won often -without any positive advantage being gained in the final result. - -The wars are arranged according to date. Some were long-drawn-out -struggles, others sharp conflicts of a few months. The number of men -engaged in any battle and the casualties if they could be tabulated -would no doubt seem comparatively small to our modern eyes. The total -loss of life in the Crimean War amounted to about 600,000 men.[1] An -estimate of the loss in killed and wounded in some of the other great -battles may be given as follows: Solferino (1859), 31,500; Chickamauga -(1863), 35,100; Gettysburg (1863), 37,000; Königrätz (1866), 26,894; -Vionville (1870), 32,800; Gravelotte (1870), 30,000; Plevna (1877), -19,000;[2] The Boer War (1899–1902): British losses, 28,603; Boers -killed, 4,000, prisoners 40,000;[3] Mukden (1905), 131,000. - - [1] _The Cambridge Modern History_, vol. xii - - [2] An article in _Current History_, by General Duryee, of the - U.S.A. Army. - - [3] _Encyclopædia Britannica._ - -Wars to the generation that experiences them are unmixed evils -engendering hatred and evil passions and bringing in their train loss, -suffering, destruction, and impoverishment, all of which are acutely -felt. The succeeding generation inherit their consequences in the -shape of high taxation and the attempts to mend and reconstruct the -dislocated national life. The horror has gone but the memory remains. -To the succeeding generation they become episodes read of in the cold -pages of history, and then at last they fade into mere names--a battle -with a vaguely remembered date. - -Each war is terminated by a treaty. The main provisions of a few -additional treaties which were not concluded after wars are also given. -In but few instances have war treaties been observed, and in several -cases they were not worth the paper they were written on. Treaties are -signed and ratified by statesmen without the sanction or approval, -and sometimes without the knowledge, of their people. The statesmen -enter the council chamber as individuals bent on securing advantages -at other people’s expense, and ready by bargain and intrigue to attain -their ends. These instruments therefore are expressions of temporary -expediency sometimes exacted after defeat, sometimes the result of -compromise and generally inconclusive. If treaties are to become sacred -obligations founded on international justice and respected not merely -by changing governments but by whole nations, the spirit in which -they are drawn up and the method by which they are concluded must be -radically altered. The existence of secret treaties and engagements has -proved to be one of the gravest dangers to European peace. - -There are a large number of conventions which have been concluded -between nations, by which social intercourse with regard to such -matters as post and telegraph is facilitated, and of late years -arbitration treaties between one Power and another have multiplied very -rapidly. This is the one advance in which the efforts of diplomacy have -borne fruit. The important treaty of Arbitration between Great Britain -and the United States is the only one of these treaties mentioned -in the list. Agreements with regard to the conduct of war have been -made, such as the Geneva Convention of 1864 and 1906, and the Hague -Declarations of 1899 and 1907, but they have proved to a large extent -futile. - -Treaties are generally concluded for an undefined period, and lapse -owing to deliberate breach or altered circumstances. But no people, and -it may safely be said no government, was precisely aware which of the -innumerable treaties were still in force, and what actually in given -circumstances its obligations were. - -There may be many instances in which a nation may look back with pride -at the victory of its arms and the achievements of its generals. There -are but few instances in which a nation can look back with pride at -the advantages gained by treaties of peace and at the achievements -of its diplomatists. From the Treaty of Vienna, 1815, to the Treaty -of Bukarest, 1913, the record of so-called settlements is not one to -inspire confidence in the efficacy of warfare or in the methods of -diplomacy. - -After the termination of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 there were great -hopes of an era of peace. But two antagonistic elements existed in -Europe which were bound sooner or later to come into open conflict. -On the one hand the French Revolution had engendered in the peoples -a spirit of unrest, of discontent, of impatience with the unfettered -monarchical system, and at the same time confidence in their power and -hope of success in the destruction of tyranny and arbitrary government. -It was in fact the rise of democracy. On the other side the despotic -governments were ready to co-operate, and, under the guidance of -Metternich, endeavour to repress and exterminate the movement for the -establishment of constitutional government, and for the expression of -nationalist and democratic aspirations. Two waves of revolution passed -over Europe in 1830 and 1848, and by the middle of the century the -reactionaries could no longer hold their own, and many states had been -freed from despotism and oppression. - -In the latter part of the century, however, as has already been -pointed out, fresh causes for war arose in the competitive ambition -of governments for imperial expansion. Wars became more frequent -and extended into remote regions of the world which had become -accessible. There are forty-seven wars mentioned in these records; of -these thirteen took place before the Crimean War, which is about the -middle of the period, and thirty-three after. In twenty-one out of -the forty-five wars Great Britain was either directly or indirectly -concerned as a belligerent. There were only two wars in which Christian -nations were not primarily involved. - -It must be remembered that in no country had the peoples any voice -in the determination of policy so far as international affairs were -concerned. While for brevity’s sake the usual phraseology is adopted, -and such expressions used as “France decided,” “Russia refused,” “Italy -intended,” etc., etc., in no case does the name of the country mean -the people or indeed anything more than a monarch and a few statesmen. -Although constitutional monarchy became established during the period -in many countries, and with it, parliamentary government, the idea of -diplomacy, foreign policy, international engagements, and treaties -being under parliamentary supervision and control, had not yet been -suggested. - -The solution of the vast problem of the avoidance of war in the future, -if it rests alone on the wisdom of sovereigns and statesmen, is not -likely, judging by the experience of the past, to be reached very -rapidly. In the meanwhile a careful examination of the events of recent -history is a necessary preparation for all who want to dispel the -strange but prevalent delusion that force of arms settles international -disputes, and this record may be useful as a manual for reference. - - - - -THE GREEK WAR - -1821–1828 - - -Belligerents: - - Greece and later Russia, France and Great Britain. - Turkey. - - -Cause: - -Nationalist aspirations had been growing in Greece ever since the -French Revolution. These were encouraged by an intellectual revival and -commercial development. The tyranny and cruel oppression of Turkish -misgovernment under Sultan Mahmud gradually inflamed public opinion. - - -Occasion: - -The Hetæria Philike, a secret society, inaugurated the rebellion. The -first move was made in Moldavia, where it completely failed. This was -followed by a revolt in the Morea and the islands of the Ægean and -subsequently in Central Greece. - - -Course of the War: - -There were wholesale massacres on both sides, notably the destruction -by the Turks of the inhabitants of Chios. The Turks were unable to -suppress the revolt. The Greeks under Kolokotrones exhausted the -Turkish army, and assistance was sought by the Sultan from Mehemet Ali, -of Egypt, who in 1823 conquered Crete and defeated the Greeks at Psara. -The Egyptians and Turks entered Morea. Missolonghi fell after a year’s -siege, and the garrison in the Acropolis at Athens surrendered in June -1827. By a treaty signed at London in July 1827 Great Britain, France, -and Russia decided to intervene as mediators. The Turks rejected -mediation. The victory of the allied fleets at Navarino took place on -October 20 1827. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Adrianople_, September 1829 (see also p. 17) Greece -became autonomous under the supreme sovereignty of the Sultan. Shortly -afterwards the Powers agreed that Greece should be established as an -absolutely independent kingdom, but without Crete or Samos, and with -a frontier line drawn from the mouth of the River Achelous to a spot -near Thermopylæ. Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg accepted the crown, but -renounced it after a few months. Prince Otho of Bavaria accepted it in -February 1833. After a revolution in 1862 he was succeeded by Prince -George of Denmark in 1863, the father of King Constantine who was -deposed in 1917. - - -Remarks: - -Greece was confined within far too narrow limits, with which she could -not rest contented. The enmity between Russia and Turkey was in no way -mitigated, and Russian ambitions remained unsatisfied. - - - - -RUSSO-TURKISH WAR - -1828–1829 - - -Belligerents: - - Russia. - Turkey. - - -Cause: - -By the Treaty of London, July 1827, Great Britain, Russia, and France -undertook to put an end to the conflict in the East, which had arisen -out of the Greek struggle for independence. After the victory of -Navarino, Canning died and Great Britain was inactive. By the _Treaty -of Akerman_, October 1826, the points of contention between Russia and -Turkey had been settled in Russia’s favour. But the Russian Government -ardently desired a contest with Turkey. - - -Occasion: - -The Sultan Mahmud issued a proclamation which was a direct challenge -to Russia, and followed it by a levy of troops and the expulsion of -Christians from Constantinople. On April 26, 1828, Russia replied by -declaring war. - - -Course of the War: - -The Russians occupied the Roumanian principalities and crossed the -Danube. At first the Turks had considerable successes in the Dobrudja, -and the Russians, who suffered enormous losses, were only able to -capture Varna. Reserves were brought up during the winter. After fierce -resistance the Turks were routed near Shumla. In July 1829 the Russians -crossed the Balkans, the fleet co-operated in the Black Sea, and the -army began to march on Constantinople. In Asia, Kars and Erzeroum -having fallen into the Russian hands, the Sultan yielded. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Adrianople_, September 14, 1829, Russian ascendancy -in the principalities of the Danube was permanently assured, and the -whole of the Caucasus was converted into Russian territory. The Straits -were declared free and open to merchant ships of all Powers. The -Turkish Government gave its adhesion to the Treaty of London regulating -the Greek frontier. - - -Remarks: - -Russia’s hold over Turkey was greatly strengthened, but the -establishment of an absolutely independent kingdom in Greece was -finally secured. - - - - -WAR BETWEEN HOLLAND AND BELGIUM - -1830–1839 - - -Belligerents: - - Holland. - Belgium, France, Great Britain. - - -Cause: - -The Kingdom of the Netherlands was set up by the Congress of Vienna in -1815, but from the first there was discord between the two states of -the kingdom. King William was a Dutchman and a Protestant. Holland, -although the smaller of the two states, had a permanent majority in the -Chamber. Public offices and appointments were filled by Dutchmen. The -hatred of Dutch rule grew, and with it a desire for separation. - - -Occasion: - -The success of the French Revolution of 1830 led to an outbreak in -Brussels, and Belgian insurgents fought against the Dutch soldiers. -The Powers met in London, and Belgium was declared a separate kingdom. -Leopold of Saxe-Coburg was offered the crown and entered Brussels as -King of the Belgians on June 21, 1831; at the same time the Dutch -prepared for an invasion. - - -Course of the War: - -On August 9, 1831, the Belgians were routed in an encounter with -the Dutch, but on the intervention of the French army King William -withdrew. The Conference in London drew up a treaty, but King William -refused to come to terms and retained possession of Antwerp. In -November a combined British and French fleet sailed for the coast of -Holland, and a French army laid siege to Antwerp. The Dutch garrison -capitulated on December 23, 1831, and the town was handed over to the -Belgians and the French troops withdrew. Still the Dutch refused to -yield and held two forts which enabled them to command the navigation -of the Scheldt. Not till March 1838 did Holland signify her readiness -to accept the treaty. - - -Political Result: - -The Conference throughout had endeavoured to come to an agreement; -Austria, Prussia, and Russia sympathized with Holland; but eventually -the final _Treaty of London_ was signed on April 19, 1839. Luxemburg -was divided, and also the district of Maestricht. The Scheldt was -declared open to the commerce of both countries. The national debt was -divided, and the five Powers guaranteed the independence and neutrality -of Belgium. - - -Remarks: - -As independent states the two countries lived side by side amicably. -The neutrality of Belgium was reaffirmed in 1870 on the outbreak of the -Franco-German War. - -Leopold was succeeded in 1865 by his son Leopold II, under whose -sovereignty the Congo Free State was placed in 1885. King Albert -succeeded his uncle in 1909. - - - - -WAR IN PORTUGAL AND SPAIN - -1830–1839 - - -Belligerents: - - Followers of Don Miguel. - Portuguese Constitutionalists. - Spaniards. - Carlists. - and for a period France and Great Britain. - - -Cause: - -Don Miguel, the head of the reactionary party, was betrothed to -Donna Maria, daughter of Pedro of Brazil. In 1828, disregarding his -professions of loyalty to the Constitution, he declared himself King of -Portugal. The Constitutionalists, who were adherents of Donna Maria, -were crushed. She received no assistance from outside to deal with the -usurper. - -In Spain Don Carlos, the King’s brother, was the representative of -the reactionary party. King Ferdinand, before his death, issued the -Pragmatic Sanction, which enabled his daughter to succeed to the -throne. The King was weak and unpopular, and Don Carlos had a great -following in Spain. - - -Occasion: - -In 1830 Great Britain and France demanded satisfaction for the attacks -on their subjects in Lisbon, and their squadrons appeared in the Tagus. -Great Britain obtained an indemnity and an apology: the French admiral -carried off the best ships of Don Miguel’s navy. In 1831 Pedro came -over from Brazil and raised troops for the reconquest of Portugal, -which began in the following year. Don Carlos was making common cause -with Don Miguel when the King of Spain died in 1833, and his child -Isabella was declared Queen, with Christina, his wife, as Regent. -Rebellion broke out, and Don Carlos was proclaimed King in several -provinces. - - -Course of the War: - -Don Pedro captured Oporto, but was besieged there for nearly a year. -With assistance from outside he overcame the resistance of the enemy -and entered Lisbon in July, 1833. A quadruple treaty was signed at -London in April 1834, by which Spain and Portugal, assisted by Great -Britain and France, engaged to drive both Miguel and Carlos from the -Peninsula. A Spanish army marched against Miguel and the British fleet -arrived. Miguel renounced the crown, and quitted the Peninsula. Don -Carlos was conducted to London, but he escaped and appeared again in -Spain at the head of his insurgents in July 1834. He gained several -victories, and prepared to march on Madrid. Christina appealed to -France for assistance, but Louis Philippe was reluctant to embark on -the enterprise and refused. The war continued till at last General -Espatero forced back the insurgents, the Carlists turned their arms -against one another, and Don Carlos surrendered and crossed the French -frontier. - - -Political Result: - -Absolutism was crushed and a more constitutional form of government -was established. But the throne of Spain was the subject of further -disputes in the future. - - -Remarks: - -This prolonged and barbaric conflict disgraced the Spanish nation. The -three Eastern Powers favoured the cause of Don Carlos and reaction. -It was the fear of possibly provoking a general war that made France -refuse to intervene. - - - - -RUSSIAN CAMPAIGN IN POLAND - -1831 - - -Belligerents: - - Russia. - Poland. - - -Cause: - -By the three partitions of 1772, 1793, and 1795 Poland ceased to exist -as an independent state, and Polish territory was divided up between -Russia, Prussia, and Austria. But in 1814 the Grand Duchy of Warsaw -was established as a separate kingdom subject to the Czar of Russia. -The economic and political life was revived and with it antagonism to -Russia. In 1828 plans were made for an outbreak, but the opportunity -was neglected. The French Revolution of 1830 rekindled the flames. - - -Occasion: - -A revolt broke out in November 1830. An attempt was made to negotiate -with the Czar Nicholas, who let it be understood that Poland had but -two alternatives, unconditional submission or annihilation. The Polish -Government, in January 1831, replied by proclaiming his dethronement. -War was unavoidable, and Russian troops crossed the Polish frontier in -February. - - -Course of the War: - -The losses sustained by the Russian armies were considerable, but the -Poles had to fall back on Warsaw and were defeated at Ostrolenka. -Russian reinforcements came up, and on September 8, 1831, the Russian -army made its entrance into Warsaw, and the revolt was suppressed. - - -Political Result: - -The Constitution of Poland was abolished: it ceased to be a separate -kingdom and became a province of the Russian Empire. The Polish leaders -were exiled. - - -Remarks: - -The Poles might have won a gradual development of constitutional -liberty without a break with the powerful sovereignty of the Czar; -the revolt no doubt was rash and unwise. But, on the other hand, the -governments of Western Europe, including Great Britain, who, by the -Treaty of Vienna, guaranteed the autonomy of Poland, never lifted a -hand on behalf of Polish independence, and acquiesced in its complete -absorption by Russia. - - - - -THE TURKO-EGYPTIAN WAR - -1832–1841 - - -Belligerents: - - Turkey and later Prussia, Austria, Russia, and Great Britain. - Egypt. - - -Cause: - -The ambition for extension of power on the part of Mehemet Ali, Viceroy -of Egypt. - - -Occasion: - -Unsatisfied with the Island of Crete given to him for his services -to the Ottoman Empire, Mehemet Ali sent his son Ibrahim with a force -and laid siege to Acre. He was declared a rebel, and the Turkish army -entered Syria. - - -Course of the War: - -Syria and Asia Minor were conquered by Ibrahim. Russia offered aid, but -on the intervention of France the Sultan was persuaded to make peace, -making over to Mehemet Ali Syria and the province of Adena. At the -same time, in July 1833, a treaty of defensive alliance was signed at -_Unkiar Skelessi_ between Russia and Turkey, by which Russia obtained -very nearly complete ascendancy at Constantinople. Great Britain -desired to maintain the Sultan’s power: France befriended Mehemet Ali: -both were agreed in checking Russian influence in the Levant. War broke -out again. Ibrahim gained a victory at Nissibim in June 1839, and the -Turkish fleet surrendered to Mehemet Ali at Alexandria. A quadruple -treaty was signed by Great Britain, Russia, Austria, and Prussia, -by which it was proposed that Mehemet should have the hereditary -government of Egypt, should withdraw from Syria and hold Palestine as a -governor under the Porte. The exclusion of France from this agreement -roused great public indignation. By the aid of the Allies Mehemet Ali -was driven from Syria. Acre was captured by Sir Charles Napier, and -Mehemet submitted. - - -Political Result: - -By the final settlement, to which France also agreed, Mehemet Ali -abandoned all claim to provinces outside Egypt, undertook to restore -the Turkish fleet, and was assured the hereditary possession of Egypt. -The Straits were closed to the warships of all nations. This prevented -Russia from becoming a Mediterranean Power. - - -Remarks: - -Turkey now became dependent on the protection of Europe. Hopes of -internal reform, however, never fructified. The conflicting ambitions -of European Powers with regard to the continually shrinking dominions -of the Sultan became henceforth an increasing source of friction. - - - - -FIRST AFGHAN WAR - -1838–1842 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain and Indian Troops. - Afghanistan. - - -Cause: - -The close proximity of Afghanistan to India necessitated the British -Government watching jealously the affairs of that country, and -preparing for the possibility of its being brought under the domination -of any other Power. Russian intrigues had been throughout a source of -suspicion and uneasiness. The British policy was declared to be the -maintenance of the integrity and independence of Afghanistan. - - -Occasion: - -The British Government decided to reinstate Shah Shuja, who was a -refugee in British territory, Dost Mahommed being in power at Kabul. - - -Course of the War: - -A British Indian force advanced in March 1838, and entered Kandahar. -Shah Shuja was crowned. Dost Mahommed withdrew, and Kabul was -entered. The war was brought to an end, but in November 1841 a revolt -broke out in Kabul and there were serious massacres. The British -garrison in withdrawing was overwhelmed between Kabul and Jalalabad. -Reinforcements, in 1842, forced the Kyber Pass, relieved Jalalabad and -occupied Kabul. The army finally evacuated Afghanistan in December 1842. - - -Political Result: - -A ruler imposed on a free people by foreign arms is always unpopular. -The Afghans considered that Shah Shuja’s rule under the protection of -British troops might be fatal to their national independence. - - -Remarks: - -This war has been described as a rash, ill-planned, and hazardous -enterprise, and was the immediate cause of further trouble. (See p. -58.) - - - - -THE OPIUM WAR IN CHINA - -1840–1842 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain. - China. - - -Cause: - -The Chinese still held the doctrine that no political relations -or dealings should be held with any foreign country. The British -Government under Palmerston decided to place trade relations with China -on a more satisfactory basis, confusion and annoyance having arisen -owing to the expiry of the East India Company’s charter. They also -resolved to protect the opium traffic in spite of the protests of the -Chinese Government. This latter reason overshadowed the others, and -the war, which was known as the Opium War, was the subject of heated -controversy in England. - - -Occasion: - -The Chinese Government refused to recognize the British Commission or -to come to terms on the opium question. Reports in 1839 from Captain -Elliot, the British Trade Commissioner, led to the decision of the -British Government to send an expedition, and war was declared in 1840. - - -Course of the War: - -The fleet captured Chusan, and in the following year Amoy. Ningpo fell, -and in 1842 Chapu, Woosung, and Shanghai shared the same fate. Before -Nanking could be captured the Chinese Government proposed terms of -peace. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Nanking_, August 21, 1842, Hong-kong was formally -ceded to the British Crown; Canton, Amoy, Fuchow, Ningpo, and Shanghai -were declared open to foreign trade. A war indemnity of twelve million -dollars was paid to Great Britain, and subsequent treaties were signed -for the regulation of trade. - - -Remarks: - -This was the beginning of the exploitation of China by the Western -Powers. It led to further wars, and the opium question continued -to agitate public opinion in Great Britain and cause disputes with -China for the rest of the century, until the opium trade was finally -abolished in 1913. - - - - -AMERICAN WAR WITH MEXICO - -1846–1848 - - -Belligerents: - - The United States of America. - Mexico. - - -Cause: - -Texas seceded from Mexico in 1836. The independence of Texas was -recognized by the United States, but the proposal that the new state -should be admitted into the Union was declined. A strong support for -the annexation of Texas in the interests of slavery grew up, more -especially in the Southern states, and in December 1844 resolutions -were passed in both Houses, and it was formally enrolled as a new state. - - -Occasion: - -The Mexican Government still claimed Texas as a province, and its -annexation by the United States was considered an act of hostility. -The Americans had suffered long under continued acts of insult and -spoliation on the part of the Mexicans, and were therefore prepared to -fight. - - -Course of the War: - -The Americans under Taylor invaded Mexico, won battles at Palo Alto -and Resaca and captured Monterey. In 1847 there were more victories, -the Mexicans under Santa Anna being everywhere defeated. The Americans -entered Mexico City on September 14th. After further fighting peace was -proclaimed at Washington in July 1848. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo_, February 2, 1848, Mexico ceded -the whole of Texas, New Mexico, and Upper California. The United States -surrendered their other conquests. - - -Remarks: - -So far as Texas was concerned, the political opinion in the United -States was divided, and that division was to become more serious as -time went on. On the other hand, Mexico was a troublesome neighbour, -and has continued ever since to be the cause of disturbance and -dispute. - - - - -AUSTRO-HUNGARIAN WAR - -1848–1849 - - -Belligerents: - - Hungary. - Austria, the Southern Slavs and Russia. - - -Cause: - -The fall of Metternich, who had been the champion of despotism and -reaction throughout Europe, and the revolutionary spirit which ran -through Europe in 1848, created great unrest in the Austro-Hungarian -Empire. The Emperor Ferdinand was weak and worthless, and the Magyars -were determined not to submit to the domination of autocratic rule in -Austria. Jellacic, the Croatian leader, hoped to create a Southern Slav -state: he co-operated with the Austrians in opposition to Hungary, and -was supported by the Czechs of Bohemia. - - -Occasion: - -Finding it impossible to come to terms with the Emperor Ferdinand, -Kossuth, the Hungarian leader, took up an uncompromisingly hostile -attitude. Jellacic marched to Pesth. A revolutionary movement of -sympathy with Hungary broke out in Vienna. The Emperor fled to Olmutz. -Windischgrätz, the Austrian general, marched on Vienna and took -possession in November 1848. Ferdinand abdicated, and Francis Joseph, -his nephew, became Emperor December 2nd. The Hungarians refused to -acknowledge him. There was a rising of Roumanians in Transylvania, and -the whole Hungarian nation was called to arms. - - -Course of the War: - -The Austrians occupied Pesth on January 5, 1849; the Hungarians -withdrew to Debreczin and were defeated at Kapolona on February 26th. -In April the Magyar troops recovered and the Austrians were driven -out of Hungary. On April 19th Hungary was proclaimed an independent -state. Russia intervened to assist Austria, and marched an army across -Galicia. The Hungarians were now confronted with a force three times -the size of their own, and the main army capitulated at Vilagos on -August 13, 1849. - - -Political Result: - -Hungary was completely crushed and subjected to savage punishment by -its conquerors. Every vestige of its old constitutional rights was -extinguished. - - -Remarks: - -In 1860 the old Constitution was restored. In 1867 the Emperor Francis -Joseph was crowned King of Hungary. A responsible ministry was -appointed, and a financial agreement (Ausgleich) made between Austria -and Hungary. - -Nationality asserted itself in spite of all attempts at repression. But -the Hungarians, in their turn, held the Slav and Roumanian populations -within their borders with an iron grasp and failed to gain their -affection. - - - - -THE ITALIAN WAR OF LIBERATION - -1831, 1848–1849, 1859 and 1866–1867 - - -Belligerents: - - The States of Italy. - Austria. - France. - - -Cause: - -Italy, after the fall of Napoleon, was divided into separate -ill-governed small states, with Venice and Lombardy in the hands of -Austria. The idea of uniting Italy under one Government grew as the -century advanced, and received fresh impetus from the revolutionary -movements in Europe in 1830 and 1848. The society, “Young Italy,” under -the guidance of Mazzini, kept the spirit of revolution alive, although -several insurrections instigated by them failed. The expulsion of -Austria became the central idea of the movement. - - -Occasion: - -The quarrels between the smaller states: the hatred of the presence -of Austria, who, under Metternich’s guidance, desired throughout to -suppress the movement: the decline of Austrian power on the rise of -Prussia: the intervention of France to prevent Austrian aggrandizement -and to protect the Pope. - - -Course of the Wars: - -The revolt in the Papal States in 1831 was suppressed by Austrian -intervention. France also intervened, and the Austrian troops withdrew. -In 1848 Sardinian troops advanced against Austria, but after much -fighting round Verona were defeated at Santa Lucia. - -Civil war broke out between Naples and Sicily. Sardinia and Piedmont, -under Victor Emmanuel and his Minister, Cavour, now took the lead. -France became their ally in 1859. In spite of attempts at mediation by -Great Britain, Austria presented an ultimatum, April 23, 1859. Napoleon -III and the Allies won victories at Magenta and Solferino. By the -_Peace of Villa Franca_ in July, followed by the _Treaty of Zurich_, -November 10, 1859, Austria ceded Lombardy but not Venice. Tuscany, -Parma Modena, and Romagna were united to Piedmont by their own vote. -Savoy and Nice were ceded to France. - -In 1860 Garibaldi conquered Sicily and Naples. Piedmontese troops -entered the Papal States. By 1861 all Italy, with the exception of -Rome and Venice, was under Victor Emmanuel. In the North war broke -out again. The Italians were defeated by Austria at Custozza, but -after Königgrätz (see p. 50) the Austrians ceded Venice to France, and -Napoleon III handed it over to Italy. This arrangement was confirmed -by the _Treaty of Vienna_, October 3, 1866, between Austria and Italy. -In 1867 France defended the Papal States against Garibaldi’s invasion, -and he was defeated at Mentana. Finally, in 1870, Napoleon III withdrew -his troops from Papal territory, and on September 20th Victor Emmanuel -entered Rome. - - -Political Result: - -All Italy became united under one monarch with its capital at Rome. -Victor Emmanuel was succeeded in 1878 by Humbert, the father of King -Victor Emmanuel III. - - -Remarks: - -The rivalry between Austria and Italy did not die down, and there were -still certain territories--_Italia irredenta_ (such as Trentino)--which -remained in Austrian hands. - - - - -THE CRIMEAN WAR - -1854–1856 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain, France, Turkey and Sardinia. - Russia. - - -Cause: - -From 1830 onwards there was a growing estrangement between Great -Britain and Russia. The Czar Nicholas believed that the dominion of the -Turk in Europe was nearing its end, and cherished the ambition that -Russia should acquire provinces of the Ottoman dominions. On the other -hand, there was keen opposition in Great Britain to Russia’s expansion, -and to the idea of Constantinople falling into her hands. Louis -Napoleon had only two years previously become Emperor of the French. -His dynastic ambitions made him eager for military glory. Sardinia -joined the Allies for tactical reasons. - - -Occasion: - -The French claimed the custody of the Holy Places in Palestine: the -Russians made a counter-claim to the custody of the Holy Places and -to a Protectorate over the Greek Christians in the Ottoman Empire. -The Turkish Government, on the advice of the British Ambassador, Lord -Stratford de Redcliffe, refused to accept the Russian claims. Russian -troops crossed the Pruth in June 1853, and a Turkish squadron was -destroyed at Sinope in November. On the refusal of Russia to make -her ships re-enter port in the Black Sea and evacuate the Danubian -principalities, war was declared by France and England on March 27, -1854. - - -Course of the War: - -The Crimea was invaded, and fighting continued there for two years. The -Austrian attempt at mediation in May 1855, failed. The Russians were -defeated at Alma and Inkerman, and Sevastopol, after a long siege, fell -on September 9, 1855. The Russians captured Kars in November. - - -Political Results: - -By the _Treaty of Paris_, March 30, 1856, the Black Sea was -neutralized. An engagement was made by all the Powers to respect the -independence and integrity of the Ottoman Empire: the Sultan promised -to give equality of treatment to his Christian subjects. The Danubian -provinces were granted independence under the sovereignty of the Sultan. - - -Remarks: - -This treaty was absolutely barren. The Sultan’s promise was never acted -on: the neutrality of the Black Sea was maintained only till 1870: and -when the integrity of the Ottoman Empire was assailed in later years -none of the signatory Powers intervened in its defence. But at the -Congress of Berlin in 1878 the Powers partitioned parts of the Ottoman -Empire. So far from settling any disputes this war caused dissensions -which led to other wars. - - - - -THE INDIAN MUTINY - -1857–1858 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain. - Native Indians. - - -Cause: - -The East India Company had engaged in constant wars and employed an -army in which native troops outnumbered the British by eight to one. -The Sepoys especially became aware of their strength and importance. In -many ways religious sensibilities were offended, dissatisfaction with -the Company’s rule spread and unrest was abroad. - - -Occasion: - -The spirit of revolt grew, and a trivial incident was sufficient to -make the spark burst into a flame. Cartridges used for the new Enfield -rifle smeared with the fat of sacred cows and the lard of polluted pigs -were to be bitten by Hindu and Mohammedan alike. The ferment caused by -the rumour spread and the mutiny broke out. - - -Course of the War: - -Native troops mutinied at Mirat, and proceeded to Delhi, Cawnpore, and -Lucknow. Many British men and women were murdered. A British force in -June and July 1857 marched on Delhi. Engagements were fought, in which -there were heavy losses. Disease and cholera also carried off many -victims. After a great struggle Lahore was captured in September, and -Agra was relieved, also Cawnpore, where, under Nana Sahib, the most -hideous massacres and cruelty had taken place. At Lucknow a heroic -resistance was made against an overwhelming force of rebels. It was -relieved on November 22, 1857. In March 1858, the whole province of -Oudh was recovered by Outram and Colin Campbell. Not till the beginning -of 1859 did organized resistance come to an end in all parts of India. - - -Political Result: - -By the Queen’s proclamation of November 1858 the government of India -was taken over by the British Government. The Queen declared that -all her Indian subjects should be protected in the exercise of their -religious observances. Excessive measures of repression which had been -resorted to were stopped. - - -Remarks: - -Queen Victoria was styled Empress of India at the instance of Disraeli -in 1876. Various reforms have been instituted in Indian administration -tentatively allowing Indians some share in the government of the -country. But the problem of British rule in India is not one which is -capable of final solution. - - - - -THE CHINESE WAR - -1857–1860 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain, France. - China. - - -Cause: - -The increasing commercial ambitions of Western Powers in the East led -Great Britain and France to insist on the establishment of fair and -equitable terms of trade. The Chinese Government was in the hands of -the Tatars known as the Taipings, who, by their successful rebellion, -had overthrown the Manchu dynasty. - - -Occasion: - -The refusal of the Chinese Government to redress long-standing -grievances or to allow the diplomatic representatives of the Western -Powers to reside in Peking; the seizure of the crew of the British -ship _Arrow_ off Canton, and the refusal of the Chinese Governor to -apologize or surrender the men, and the murder of a French missionary -in Kwangsi brought things to a head. - - -Course of the War: - -Canton was taken by the British in December 1857. The Taku Forts fell -in May 1858 and Tientsin was occupied. Negotiations were attempted but -failed. An allied force of British and French landed in 1860, marched -on Peking, and the Chinese yielded. - - -Political Result: - -By the treaty of October 24, 1860, the Chinese paid an indemnity of -eight million taels. The right of Europeans to travel in the interior -was granted, and freedom guaranteed to the preaching of Christianity. -By the customs tariff agreed upon the import of opium was legalized. -In the course of 1861 British, French, and Russian legations were -permanently established at Peking, and in the following years the same -right was conceded to other European nations. By treaties with Russia -in the same year China ceded all its territory north of the Amur to -Russia, and in this territory Vladivostock was founded. - -Good relations having been established, the Chinese Government, with -the assistance of Gordon, carried out a successful campaign against the -Taipings, and the Manchu dynasty was restored. - - -Remarks: - -This was the opening of the door into China, and from henceforth the -Western Powers began to compete for commercial and territorial prizes -in the Chinese Empire. - - - - -AMERICAN CIVIL WAR - -1861–1865 - - -Belligerents: - - The Northern states of North America. - The Southern states of North America. - - -Cause: - -The cultivation of cotton progressed under very different conditions -in the North and South. In the North the white man had to work -vigorously to overcome the disadvantages of the soil. In the South -the negro labourer could be used with profit to his owner, and was -held as a slave. By 1860 the thirteen original states were enlarged to -thirty-three. The territories of the North-east found their prosperity -in free labour, the South throve on the cotton crop and continued to -exploit negro labour. The Southern states gradually combined together, -and between 1830 and 1850 gained a predominant voice in the control -of Federal affairs. The North also became consolidated, and a strong -movement against slavery grew up, chiefly owing to the efforts of -W. Lloyd Garrison. A new Republican party gained strength in its -opposition to the dominating differences of the South, and sectional -political differences were intensified. The prospect of the abolition -of slavery was not the only issue. The South resented the idea that -coercive measures might be used to keep the lower South in the Union. -They believed this to be an attack on the doctrine of the sovereignty -of states. A widespread feeling in favour of secession grew up. - - -Occasion: - -The Republican party triumphed at the election, and Abraham Lincoln -became President in November, 1860. South Carolina seceded, ten other -states followed, and the Confederate States were established under -the Presidency of Jefferson Davis. The attack on Fort Sumter by the -Confederates on April 4, 1861, made war inevitable. - - -Course of the War: - -The North was defeated at Bull Run in July 1861, but captured forts -Henry and Donelson in 1862, and gained a victory at Shiloh. At -Richmond, and later at Fredericksburg, the North was defeated. Lincoln -issued his proclamation of Emancipation on January 1, 1863. The -South, under Lee, were defeated in the greatest battle of the war at -Gettysburg, on July 4th. In 1864 there were further victories for the -North under Grant at Spottsylvania and Coldharbour; and Atlanta and -Savanah were captured. In 1865 Petersburg and Richmond were evacuated -by the Confederates and Lee surrendered. On May 26th the war came to an -end, after a desperate struggle of nearly four years. - - -Political Result: - -The Union was restored and slavery abolished. Lincoln was assassinated -on April 14, 1865, and his wise counsel was lost therefore for the -difficult work of reconstruction which followed the war. - - -Remarks: - -Great Britain declared neutrality at the outset, and thereby -implicitly, though not explicitly, recognized the Southern Confederacy -as a belligerent Power. There was much sympathy with the South among -the governing class, but the people were on the side of the North. The -Trent affair brought Great Britain and America very near to war. (See -_Treaty of Washington_, p. 94.) - - - - -FRENCH EXPEDITION IN MEXICO - -1862–1867 - - -Belligerents: - - France. - Mexican Republicans. - - -Cause: - -From 1789, the date of the first conspiracy against Spain, down to -1857, when a Constitution was promulgated, Mexico was in a state of -permanent warfare. In 1861 France, Spain, and Great Britain adopted -joint measures against the republic in order to get better protection -for their subjects and their property. In 1862 Great Britain and Spain -withdrew. But Napoleon III conceived the project of establishing a -monarchy in Mexico under his patronage, and so increasing French -ascendancy beyond the Atlantic. - - -Occasion: - -The financial misdemeanours of the Mexican Government were made the -pretext for the advance of French troops into Mexico in 1862. - - -Course of the War: - -The French force was checked in May 1862, and further reinforcements -were sent out. They advanced again in February 1863, and entered Mexico -City in June. A Provisional Government was established, and the crown -was offered to Maximilian of Austria, who accepted it and reached -Mexico City in June 1864. Juarez, the republican leader, was driven -into the extreme north of the country. But his resistance was by no -means overcome. Napoleon III bound himself to keep a force in Mexico -for the protection of Maximilian. In 1865, on the restoration of peace -after the Civil War in the United States, the Government of Washington -refused to acknowledge any authority in Mexico but that of Juarez. The -French were obliged to withdraw in 1867, and Maximilian was left to his -fate. The Juarists got the upper hand, and Maximilian was executed. - - -Political Result: - -Juarez, as President of Mexico, was succeeded by Diaz in 1877; and -order was maintained for a generation. - - -Remarks: - -This foolish enterprise damaged the reputation of Napoleon III. He was -regarded as a political adventurer, and became increasingly unpopular -in his own country. - - - - -BRAZILIAN WAR - -1864–1870 - - -Belligerents: - - Brazil, Uruguay, Argentine Republic. - Paraguay. - - -Cause: - -Brazil was part of the Portuguese possessions until 1822, when it -declared its independence. The Emperors Pedro I and II had frequent -trouble not only with the republican movement in Brazil itself, but -with the neighbouring states, with whom they were constantly at war. In -1855 Pedro II sent a squadron up the Parana to adjust several questions -outstanding with the republic of Paraguay. Although certain rights were -granted to Brazil the Government of Paraguay threw every obstacle in -the way to prevent a settlement. - - -Occasion: - -In 1864 Lopez, the ambitious dictator of Paraguay, without declaring -war, captured a Brazilian vessel, and invaded Brazil and the Argentine. -Uruguay joined them in a triple alliance of defence against Paraguay. - - -Course of the War: - -Owing to the strong natural position of Paraguay, and the obstinacy of -Lopez, the war was drawn out with constant fighting and great sacrifice -of life in addition to vast expenditure, until 1870, when it was -terminated by the capture and death of Lopez. - - -Political Result: - -External troubles ceased, but the republican movement gained in -strength until 1889, when Pedro was deposed and a republic declared in -Brazil. - - -Remarks: - -The slaughter in this war was so terrific that the population of -Paraguay was reduced from 1,337,439 to 221,079. - -This is only one example of the very frequent disturbances, both -internal and external, in the South American continent during the -course of the century. - - - - -THE DANISH WAR - -1864 - - -Belligerents: - - Denmark. - Prussia and Austria. - - -Cause: - -The strong revival of nationalism in Germany after the Napoleonic Wars -spread to the German inhabitants of the Duchies of Schleswig Holstein, -who desired in 1848 to be incorporated as a single constitutional -state in the German Federation. The Danish crown could be inherited by -female heirs, but in the Duchies the Salic law had never been repealed. -This made complications with regard to the succession. Frederick VII -of Denmark endeavoured to preserve the Duchy as an integral part of -Denmark. An insurrection broke out, and Prussia intervened by marching -troops into Holstein. Under pressure from other Powers the King of -Prussia signed a convention at Malmoe practically yielding all the -Danish demands, and in 1850, by the _Treaty of Berlin_, peace was -restored between Prussia and Denmark, but without any settlement of -the vexed question. In 1852 Great Britain intervened with a proposal -without success. In 1854 the King of Denmark promulgated special -Constitutions for the Duchies as well as a common Constitution for the -whole Monarchy. The German Confederation rejected this as the Diets of -the Duchies had not been consulted. The question became of European -interest: its complexity prevented any settlement being reached. -Bismarck alone was quite determined on eventual annexation, and Denmark -was equally determined not to yield. - - -Occasion: - -After further diplomatic disputes Austrian and Prussian troops entered -Schleswig in February 1864. - - -Course of the War: - -The allied troops broke through the frontier fortifications and -occupied the greater part of the Danish mainland. The Danes were -overthrown in the island of Alsen, and the German flag carried to the -northern extremity of Denmark. A conference was opened in London, April -1864, but the negotiations broke down and the war continued. - - -Political Result: - -Eventually, by the _Treaty of Vienna_, October 30, 1864, the King of -Denmark ceded the rights in the whole of Schleswig Holstein to the -Sovereigns of Austria and Prussia jointly. - - -Remarks: - -This was more a diplomatic war than a military war. The conflict was -between retention and annexation, and little regard was paid on any -side to the desires of the inhabitants of the disputed territory. -Although by the _Treaty of London_ of 1852 the Powers, including Great -Britain, had acknowledged as permanent the principle of the integrity -of the Danish Monarchy no steps were taken by them to maintain that -principle. The settlement did nothing to prevent the outbreak of war -between Prussia and Austria two years later, when Schleswig Holstein -was again one of the bones of contention. - - - - -THE AUSTRO-PRUSSIAN WAR - -1866 - - -Belligerents: - - Prussia and some of the smaller North German States and Italy. - Austria and the other German States. - - -Cause: - -From 1848 onwards in all the projects for a united Germany there was -keen rivalry between Prussia and Austria. Each resisted the domination -of the other in any new Empire, and the South German states were -inclined to side with Austria against Prussian supremacy. This state of -affairs prevented any final scheme from being agreed to. At the same -time there were serious differences between Austria and Italy, who was -Prussia’s ally. Bismarck made up his mind that Austria must be expelled -by force of arms from the German Federation. He was an ardent supporter -of the House of Hohenzollern. - - -Occasion: - -Austria supported Schleswig Holstein in their struggle for independence -against Prussia after the conclusion of the Danish War. An attempted -congress of neutrals failed. Austria called on the Diet of Frankfort -to take the affairs of Schleswig Holstein into its own hands, and -demanded and obtained the mobilization of the whole Federal armies. -Prussia declared that this action made an end of the Federal Union, -and submitted a new plan for the organization of Germany, which was -refused. Diplomatic relations were broken off June 12, 1866. - - -Course of the War: - -Hanover and Hesse Cassel were conquered by Prussia, the Austrians were -defeated at Königgrätz, July 3, 1866, and the Prussians pushed forward -in sight of Vienna. The Austrians defeated the Italians on land at -Custozza, and by sea at Lissa. - - -Political Result: - -Napoleon III offered mediation, which was accepted. The _Treaty of -Prague_, August 23, 1866. Prussia annexed Hanover, Nassau, Hesse -Cassel, and Frankfort: Germany north of the Main together with Saxony -was included in a Federation under Prussia: the Southern states were -left independent. Prussian sovereignty over Schleswig Holstein was -recognized. Austria withdrew completely from German affairs. - - -Remarks: - -Napoleon III had attempted, by dividing Germany in two, to put an -obstacle in the way of German unity. His clumsy diplomacy was greatly -disapproved of in France. By preventing a final settlement he made the -recurrence of war inevitable. - - - - -BRITISH EXPEDITION IN ABYSSINIA - -1867–1868 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain. - Abyssinia. - - -Cause: - -From 1855 Abyssinia came under the powerful rule of the Emperor -Theodore. He subdued the neighbouring kingdoms of Tigré and Shoa, and -took Menelek, son of the ruler of Tigré, to be trained in his service. -He ravaged the surrounding country, and oppressed his own people. In -1864 there was an interchange of letters between Theodore and the -British Government, out of which difficulties arose. - - -Occasion: - -The British Consul and his staff, and subsequently a British emissary, -were imprisoned in Magdala and put in chains. Their release was -demanded, but the Emperor paid no attention, and the British Government -decided they must have recourse to arms. - - -Course of the War: - -A British force under Sir Robert Napier landed in January 1868, a -march of three hundred miles was undertaken through the mountainous -districts, and, after a fierce engagement, Magdala was stormed and -taken on April 13, 1868. The Emperor committed suicide, and his son was -taken to England, where he died. The British troops left the country in -May 1868. - - -Political Result: - -The ruler of Tigré succeeded Theodore under the title of King John, and -on his death, in 1889, Menelek became Emperor. - - -Remarks: - -After this the Italians came on to the scene with ambitions in this -part of Africa (see p. 74), but Abyssinia remained an independent -kingdom. In the various expeditions against the Mullah in Somaliland -(1902–4) the Abyssinians co-operated with Great Britain. - - - - -THE FRANCO-GERMAN WAR - -1870–1871 - - -Belligerents: - - France. - Prussia and ten other German States. - - -Cause: - -For some years previously there had been increasing friction between -France and Prussia, owing chiefly to Louis Napoleon’s apprehensions -as to the possibility of closer union between Prussia and the South -German states, his repeated endeavours to extend the Eastern frontier -of France, and Bismarck’s counter-moves to frustrate his designs. The -desire also for a united Germany was growing stronger, and Bismarck -believed it could not be completed without a conflict with France. - - -Occasion: - -The candidature of Prince Leopold of Hohenzollern Sigmaringen for -the throne of Spain in 1870 was resented by France as calculated to -bring Spain under the influence of Prussia. King William of Prussia, -on representations from France, persuaded Prince Leopold to withdraw, -but refused firmly but politely a guarantee against the renewal of the -candidature. Bismarck published a telegram conveying the impression -that the French Ambassador, Benedetti, had been insulted by the King at -Ems on the occasion of the refusal. This infuriated public opinion in -France, the Empress Eugénie actively used her influence, and Napoleon -agreed to a declaration of war on July 14, 1870. - - -Course of the War: - -In the war, which lasted from July 1870 to February 1871, the -ill-organized and badly led French troops could make no stand against -the well-prepared armies of Germany. The French were defeated at Wörth, -August 6th; Metz, August 7th; Marsla Tour, August 17th; Gravelotte, -August 18th. Paris was besieged: Louis Napoleon capitulated at Sedan, -September 2nd; Strasburg fell, September 28th; Bazaine capitulated at -Metz, October 27th; and the Germans entered Paris on January 28, 1871. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Frankfort_, May 10, 1871, Alsace and half Lorraine -(with Metz) were ceded to Germany, and an indemnity of 200 millions was -exacted from France. The King of Prussia was proclaimed at Versailles -German Emperor. France was declared a republic, and Napoleon eventually -retired into exile in England. - - -Remarks: - -The dictation of terms and the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine entirely -prevented friendly relations from being established between the two -countries in the succeeding years. France, by getting rid of the -corrupt and incompetent government of Napoleon III, began to recuperate -from this time onward. Germany, having reached the ideal of unity, -proceeded gradually to join in the competition for commercial expansion -and Imperial aggrandizement. - - - - -THE ASHANTI WAR - -1873–1874 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain. - The Ashantis. - - -Cause: - -The Ashantis, a very fierce and warlike tribe on the Gold Coast of -Africa had repeatedly caused trouble owing to their treatment of the -Fantis, a tribe on the coast under British protection. In 1824 they -defeated a British force and carried off to Kumasi the skull of the -Governor, Sir Charles M’Carthy, which was used as a royal drinking cup. -They were afterwards defeated in 1826. In 1863 an expedition against -them had to be abandoned owing to the ravages done by sickness among -the troops. In 1867 a warlike king, Kofi Karikari succeeded as ruler -and proceeded to make hostile preparations against the Fantis. - - -Occasion: - -In 1872 some Dutch possessions on the Gold Coast were transferred to -Great Britain. The King of Ashanti claimed a tribute formerly allowed -to him by the Dutch and refused to evacuate the territory ceded -to Britain. He also held four Europeans in captivity. The British -Government determined to take up the matter seriously, and when in -January 1873 an Ashanti force invaded the British Protectorate an -expedition under Sir Garnet Wolseley was immediately despatched. - - -Course of the War: - -Owing to difficulties of climate it was necessary that the whole -campaign should be rapidly carried out. The Ashantis were defeated at -all points. Kumasi was reached and King Kofi surrendered. The European -troops suffered severely from fever but the objects were successfully -accomplished. Wolseley sailed from England on September 12, 1873, and -returned to Portsmouth on March 21, 1874. - - -Political Result: - -The King renounced his claim to supremacy over any part of the former -Dutch protectorate, paid an indemnity in gold, and agreed to prohibit -human sacrifices. Further trouble arose, however, after the death of -the King, his successors disregarding the treaty. In 1895 an expedition -was sent out under Colonel Sir F. Scott. Kumasi was occupied and King -Prempeh deported. Still the Ashanti tribes refused to submit, and -continued in rebellion. The Governor of the Gold Coast and a small -force were surrounded in Kumasi. He managed to escape and Kumasi was -finally relieved by an expedition under Colonel Wilcocks who gradually -suppressed the rebellion. By an Order in Council of September 26, 1901, -Ashanti was formally annexed to the British dominions and given a -separate administration under the control of the Governor of the Gold -Coast. - - -Remarks: - -Imperial responsibilities entail the protection of friendly tribes -against hostile attack in the outlying parts of the Empire. Punitive -expeditions become necessary and annexation is found to be the best -method of securing law and order. - - - - -RUSSO-TURKISH WAR - -1877–1878 - - -Belligerents: - - Russia. - Turkey. - - -Cause: - -The persecution and oppression of Christians in the Ottoman Empire -led to a revolt in Herzegovina in 1875. Andrassy, on behalf of -Austria, presented a Note to the Turkish Government demanding reforms, -and this was followed by the Berlin Memorandum, signed by Germany, -France, Austria, Russia, and Italy. Great Britain alone stood out. The -Bulgarian massacres in June 1876 caused a great sensation in England, -and were followed by a declaration of war by Servia and Montenegro -against Turkey. Great Britain, always mistrusting Russian designs, -called a Conference. The demands of the Conference were rejected by -Turkey in January 1877. The Sultan protested against the encroachment -of the Powers on his inviolable rights. - - -Occasion: - -The London Protocol of March 1877, signed by Great Britain and Russia -and agreed to by the other Powers, called for reforms and expressed the -intention of the Powers to safeguard the Christian population. This was -also rejected by the Turks, and Russia declared war on April 24, 1877. - - -Course of the War: - -The Russian army crossed the Danube. Plevna fell in December 1877. -The Russians entered Adrianople, January 1878. The advance of the -Russian army towards Gallipoli was followed by the dispatch of the -British fleet to Constantinople and brought Russia and Great Britain -within a hair’s-breadth of war. This, however, was avoided and peace -negotiations began. - - -Political Result: - -_Treaty of San Stefano_, March 3, 1878. The independence of Servia, -Montenegro, and Roumania was recognized. Bulgaria was made an -autonomous principality with frontiers including the greater part of -European Turkey; the Dobrudja and certain districts in Asia Minor were -ceded to Russia. - -Great Britain objected strongly to this treaty, and proposed a Congress -at Berlin. While the chances of the Congress hung in the balance, Great -Britain made warlike preparations, but the Congress was finally agreed -to. - -_Treaty of Berlin_, July 13, 1878. Bulgaria’s frontier was confined to -the country north of the Balkans. Bosnia and Herzegovina were handed -over to Austria: the territory given to Serbia and Montenegro was -further restricted: Thessaly and part of Epirus were ceded to Greece. - -By a secret convention Great Britain engaged to protect Turkey against -further aggression of Russia in Asia. In return the Porte assigned -Cyprus to be occupied and administered by England. - -Lord Beaconsfield was the British Plenipotentiary at the Peace Congress -and returned declaring he had secured “peace with honour.” - - -Remarks: - -This was a patched-up peace. It settled none of the problems in the -Balkans, which continued to be the danger zone in Europe for the rest -of the century. - - - - -THE SECOND AFGHAN WAR - -1878–1881 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain and Indian Troops. - Afghanistan. - - -Cause: - -In 1868 the expanding power of Russia in Asia resulted in Bokhara -becoming a Russian dependency. In 1873 Russia conquered Khiva. Shere -Ali, now ruler of Afghanistan, became alarmed, but failing to come -to an understanding with the British Government, he began to make -overtures to Russia. In 1877 an offer of alliance was made by the -Viceroy of India, but Shere Ali refused to admit a British Agent into -Afghanistan. - - -Occasion: - -In 1878 the Russian Government sent an envoy to Kabul to make a treaty -with the Amir. A British army was also sent, but was turned back on the -frontier, and hostilities were proclaimed by the Viceroy. - - -Course of the War: - -Two British forces marched into the interior of Afghanistan, and -occupied important positions. Shere Ali fled from his capital, and -died in February 1879. By the _Treaty of Gandamuk_, May 1879, Yakub -Khan was recognized as Amir, and he agreed that a British envoy should -reside at his Court. In September 1879, the envoy, his staff, and -his escort were massacred. A fresh expedition was sent under Sir F. -Roberts, who entered Kabul. In 1880, Abdur Rahman, nephew of Shere Ali, -returned from exile in Russia and established himself in the northern -provinces. The British Government came to an agreement with him, and he -was recognized as Amir. In July 1880 Ayub Khan, another son of Shere -Ali, defeated a British force at Maiwand. Roberts reached Kandahar -from Kabul by a rapid march, and defeated Ayub Khan on September 1, -1880. Again, in July 1881, Ayub Khan returned and took possession of -Kandahar, but was finally routed by Abdur Rahman in September. - - -Political Result: - -The frontiers of Afghanistan were delimited in agreement with Russia. -Abdur Rahman’s rulership over Afghanistan was established. He extended -and consolidated his dominion over the whole country, and was -peacefully succeeded by his son Habibullah in 1901. - - -Remarks: - -By the Anglo-Russia Convention of 1907, Great Britain engaged not to -alter the political status of Afghanistan, and Russia recognized it as -outside her sphere of influence. - - - - -THE ZULU WAR - -1879 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain. - The Zulus. - - -Cause: - -The warlike and threatening attitude of the Zulus under Cetywayo -constituted a perpetual menace to the safety of the British possessions -in South Africa. The policy of Sir Bartle Frere, Governor of the Cape -and High Commissioner, was the eventual Federation of all South African -states under British rule, and it was essential, therefore, in his -opinion, that the white inhabitants should be secured against native -raids. There was a strong opinion that this could be effected without -force of arms. - - -Occasion: - -The cruelties and excesses practised by Cetywayo culminated in a raid -into Natal, where women were carried off and murdered. Frere issued an -ultimatum demanding the break-up of the military system of Zululand, -and further that a British Resident was to be received and missionaries -were not to be molested. No reply was received, and British troops -entered Zululand on January 10, 1879. - - -Course of the War: - -Frere’s application for reinforcements was refused by the British -Government. But after a British defeat at Isandhlwana, January 22, -1879, which was only prevented from being a disaster by the gallant -defence of Rorke’s Drift, Sir Garnet Wolseley was sent out with more -troops. The Zulus were defeated at Ulundi, July 5th, and Cetywayo was -taken prisoner. - - -Political Result: - -Zululand was divided into thirteen districts, each with a separate -chief, and was placed under a British Resident. It was finally annexed -in 1887. - - -Remarks: - -This war is only an episode in the extension and consolidation of the -British Empire in South Africa. But it is an instance of the grave -responsibilities which are involved in Imperial expansion. - -In the course of the war the Prince Imperial, only son of Napoleon III, -was killed, and with him died the last hopes of a restoration of the -Napoleonic dynasty in France. - - - - -THE CHILE-PERUVIAN WAR - -1879–1882 - - -Belligerents: - - Chile. - Peru. Bolivia. - - -Cause: - -After the blockade and bombardment of their ports by a Spanish squadron -in 1865, on account of their sympathy with Peru in a quarrel with -Spain, the Chileans were impressed with the necessity of possessing an -adequate fleet to defend their long coast line. Ships were obtained and -officers trained, so that Chile became well equipped for any future -encounter. - -The authorities of Bolivia seized the effects of the Chilean Nitrate -Company at Antofogasta. - - -Occasion: - -Five hundred soldiers were despatched to protect Chilean interests. The -force landed and marched inland. Bolivia declared war on March 1st, -Peru on April 5, 1879. - - -Course of the War: - -The Chileans occupied every port on the Bolivian coast, and engaged the -Peruvian fleet. The _Huascar_, a Peruvian ironclad, after other ships -had been destroyed, did great damage under four successive commanders, -but after severe fighting was forced to surrender off Angamos, and the -Peruvian navy ceased to exist. After several engagements on land the -Chileans succeeded in taking possession of the Bolivian seaboard and -the Peruvian province of Tarapaca. - -Fighting continued in 1880 when, in spite of daring resistance, the -Peruvians were defeated at all points. Lima was occupied on January 17, -1881, and Callao surrendered on January 18th. The last engagement took -place in September 1882, and a small army of occupation was left in -Peru. - - -Political Result: - -The Treaty of Peace was not ratified till April 1884. Peru ceded to -Chile the province of Tarapaca. The provinces of Tacna and Arica were -placed under Chilean authority for ten years, after which they were to -decide their own future government. Chile, however, eventually evaded -compliance with this agreement and retained forcible possession of the -provinces. Chile retained possession of the Bolivian seaboard, thus -cutting off Bolivia from access to the Pacific. - - -Remarks: - -The aggressive attitude of Chile was a cause of complaint with the -neighbouring states, and nearly led on more than one occasion to -further conflict. By a Treaty signed in 1905, however, Bolivia at last -ceded all claims to a seaport and strip of coast. Chile, except for a -civil war in 1891, is distinguished among the South American States by -its freedom from revolution and serious political unrest. - - - - -THE FRENCH EXPEDITION IN TUNIS - -1881 - - -Belligerents: - - France. - The Arabs of Tunis. - - -Cause: - -Tunis under the government of the Beys formed part of the Ottoman -Empire. In 1862 Italy began to take an interest in Tunis. A triple -British, French, and Italian control over Tunisian finances was -established in 1869. In 1878, at the Congress of Berlin, Great Britain -came to a secret understanding to allow France a free hand in Tunis in -return for French acquiescence in the British lease of Cyprus. - - -Occasion: - -In 1880 the Italians bought the British railway from Tunis to Golitta. -France, under the pretext of chastising independent tribes in the -north-east, determined to take action. - - -Course of the War: - -A French force marched on the capital. The conquest of the country was -not effected without serious resistance, specially at Sjax, but finally -the whole country was brought completely under French jurisdiction, and -the Bey was compelled to accept a French protectorate. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Bardo_, May 12, 1881, and a further _Treaty of La -Marsa_, June 8, 1883, the French protectorate was established. Italy -did not recognize the full consequences of the French protectorate -till 1896. Protests by Turkey were ignored by France, and in 1892 the -Ottoman Government was prepared to delimit the Tunis-Tripoli frontier. -But there were various frontier incidents, and Turkey maintained the -claim that the Tunisians were Ottoman subjects. - - -Remarks: - -The occupation of Tunis led to an estrangement between France and -Italy. - - - - -THE EGYPTIAN WAR - -1882 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain. - Egypt. - - -Cause: - -Since 1840, while Egypt had been virtually independent, Great Britain -had been regarded as the special champion of Turkish suzerainty; -France as the protector of the Viceroys of Egypt. The construction of -the Suez Canal, chiefly engineered by France and Great Britain, made -Egypt of new importance, as the direct route to India now lay through -the Red Sea. An Anglo-French financial control was established to -secure payment of interest on the enormous sums lent to the Khedive -Ismail. British influence became paramount, and the British Government -gradually assumed the responsibility for good government in Egypt. - - -Occasion: - -An anti-Turkish revolt under Arabi Pasha broke out, and there was a -massacre of Christians in Alexandria in June 1882. The Khedive was -powerless. The Powers met in conference at Constantinople, but before -any decision was arrived at the British Government resolved to act. - - -Course of the War: - -The bombardment of Alexandria took place on July 11, 1882, and the -Egyptian troops set fire to the town. The Sultan was willing to enter -into a military convention with Great Britain, but before it was signed -the Egyptians were defeated at Tel-el Kebir by the British under Sir -Garnet Wolseley, on September 13, 1882, and Arabi surrendered. - - -Political Result: - -Arabi and other Pashas were banished to Ceylon. - -The military occupation of Egypt by Great Britain, in spite of -declarations to the effect that the troops would shortly be withdrawn, -and in spite of protests from France, became permanent. - - -Remarks: - -Till the Anglo-French agreement of 1904 France adopted a more or -less hostile attitude with regard to Egypt. Many administrative and -financial reforms were introduced by Sir Evelyn Baring, afterwards Lord -Cromer. The government was practically taken out of the hands of the -Egyptians, and from time to time there was trouble with a nationalist -movement. - - - - -FRANCO-CHINESE WAR - -1884–1885 - - -Belligerents: - - France. - China. - - -Cause: - -France, after 1870, turned its attention more and more to colonial -expansion in Africa, and also in Asia, where for some time efforts had -been made by the French to indemnify themselves in Indo-China for the -loss of Hindustan. In 1875 a vague treaty with the Emperor of Annam -gave France the protectorate. The importance was realized of finding a -path of penetration towards China. - - -Occasion: - -In 1883–1884 an attempt was made to force the Emperor of Annam to -acknowledge the protectorate and to secure the delta of Tonkin. The -Chinese Government, unwilling to have France as a neighbour, took the -offensive. - - -Course of the War: - -The French fleet destroyed the arsenal of Foochow, took possession of -Formosa, Kelung, and the Pescadores Islands, and blockaded Southern -China. A French brigade was put to flight near Langsen. Incorrect -information as to the extent of the reverse caused the overthrow of -Jules Ferry’s ministry. But the victories and blockade of the French -fleet induced China to accept peace. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Tientsin_, June 9, 1885, China recognized the French -protectorate in Tonkin and Annam, and promised to open the southern -provinces to French traders. - -By treaties with Siam in 1893, and Great Britain in 1892–1896, Cambodia -came also under French protection, and the Empire in Indo-China was -consolidated. - - -Remarks: - -France definitely joined in the competition for Imperial expansion. - - - - -THE BURMESE WARS - -1823–1826, 1851, 1885 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain. - Burma. - - -Cause: - -The expansion of the British Empire in India involved the subjection of -neighbouring states. In addition to this there was fear of the rivalry -of France in Burma. - - -Occasions: - -(1) The conquest of Assam, which was under British protection, by the -King of Ava in 1823, and the attack by him on a British fort at Shapur, -led to the declaration of war against Burma. - -(2) The insults offered to the British flag at Rangoon by the King of -Ava, led to the fresh outbreak of war in 1851. - -(3) King Thibaw’s despotic rule and his design to enter into an -agreement with France, led to the last Ultimatum in 1885. - - -Course of the Wars: - -(I) A British force was defeated at Ramu, and the first two attempts to -reach Ava failed. Martaban and Tennasserin were taken by the British, -and the Burmese were expelled from Rangoon in December 1824. Prome -was reached in April 1825. Myede was entered in December. In 1826 Sir -Archibald Campbell pushed on to Yandabu, forty-five miles from Ava. By -the treaty of peace February 24, 1826, the British gained the provinces -of Assam, Arakan, and the coast of Tenasserim. - -(II) In April, 1852, as the King of Ava refused to come to terms, -Rangoon, Martaban, and Bassein were taken by Dalhousie. Prome was -taken in October, and Pegu in November 1852. No treaty was signed but -the King was prepared to accept an accomplished fact. - -(III) In 1885 the British Ultimatum took King Thibaw by surprise, and -within a fortnight he surrendered unconditionally when the British -force approached his capital. Guerilla warfare continued for nearly two -years. - - -Political Result: - -By the proclamation of January 1, 1886, the whole of Burma was annexed, -and Thibaw was deported to India. - - -Remarks: - -The conquest of Burma was affected, not so much because of the misrule -of the Kings of Ava as from a motive of Imperial expansion and the -desire to forestall the designs of France. - - - - -THE SERBO-BULGARIAN WAR - -1885 - - -Belligerents: - - Bulgaria. - Serbia. - - -Cause: - -The Treaty of Berlin of 1878 left abundant material for future conflict -in European Turkey. Bulgaria was confined to the north of the Balkan -mountains, and Eastern Roumelia was still under the Sultan. Prince -Alexander of Battenberg, the ruler of Bulgaria, in September 1885, -marched south and occupied Philippopolis. The Sultan protested, the -Czar was indignant, but Great Britain approved the Union of Roumelia -with Bulgaria, and the danger of war passed away. The success of -Bulgaria whetted the appetite of Milan, who had become King of Serbia -in 1882. With a view to strengthening the prestige of his dynasty he -adopted a spirited foreign policy and awaited an opportunity. - - -Occasion: - -Frontier troubles and tariff disputes between the two countries had -embittered relations, and the King of Serbia declared war, thinking -he would have a triumphal march to Sofia, the Russian officers having -withdrawn from the Bulgarian army. - - -Course of the War: - -The Bulgarians gained a decisive victory at Slivnitsa on November 16, -1885, and occupied Pirot, and the road to Belgrade lay open before -them. But Austria intervened on behalf of Serbia, and after fourteen -days’ fighting an armistice was signed. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Buckarest_, March 3, 1886, the _status quo_ was -restored; Bulgaria gained nothing, but established her right to Eastern -Roumelia. Owing to Russian intrigue Alexander was forced to abdicate -and was succeeded by Ferdinand of Saxe-Coburg as Prince of Bulgaria. - - -Remarks: - -Bulgaria became gradually the most advanced and formidable state in the -Balkans. In 1908, at the time of the revolutionary crisis in Turkey and -the annexation of Bosnia and Herzogovina by Austria, Ferdinand declared -himself Czar of a completely independent Bulgaria. - -Milan abdicated in 1889, and his son Alexander became King of Serbia. -He and his wife were murdered in 1903 and Peter Karageorgevich accepted -the crown. - - - - -THE CHINO-JAPANESE WAR - -1894–1895 - - -Belligerents: - - Japan. - China and Korea. - - -Cause: - -Japan adopting Western ideas developed into a powerful state with -surprising rapidity during the last fifty years of the nineteenth -century. The growth of her armaments and an ambition for expansion -necessarily followed. China, on the other hand, did not welcome -the influence of the West, which rapid transit and communication -had brought into Asia. The weakness and misgovernment of Korea was -a perpetual temptation to her neighbours. Japan invited China to -co-operate in demanding reforms in Korea, but China refused and Japan -acted alone. - - -Occasion: - -In July 1894 Japan issued an Ultimatum calling on Korea to accept -a Japanese programme of reforms. Korea temporized, and Seoul, the -capital, was taken without difficulty, the Emperor being made a -prisoner. China immediately intervened. - - -Course of the War: - -By land and sea the Japanese, who had been trained by European -officers, were easily victorious. Asan was occupied, a victory was -gained off the Yalu River, and the Japanese marched on Yingkow. Port -Arthur, on the Liao-Tung peninsula, was captured, finally Wei-hai-Wei -fell, and Li Hung Chang, the Chinese Minister, sued for peace. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Shimonoseki_, China ceded to Japan the Liao Tung -peninsula, the island of Formosa and the Pescadores Islands, and the -indemnity was fixed at 200 million taels. But Russia, France, and -Germany intervened, and ordered Japan to surrender the Liao Tung -Peninsula on the ground that Port Arthur threatened the independence of -Peking. But the insincerity of the intervention of the Western Powers -was revealed in 1897, when China was compelled to lease Kiao Chow to -Germany, Port Arthur to Russia, Wei-hai-Wei to Great Britain, while -France obtained a concession near Tonkin. Only the Italian claim for -the port of Sanmen was refused by China. - - -Remarks: - -The encroachments of the Western Powers evoked intense indignation in -China. The rivalry in the exploitation of the Far East by the West had -begun in real earnest. - - - - -THE ITALO-ABYSSINIAN WAR - -1895–1896 - - -Belligerents: - - Italy. - Abyssinia. - - -Cause: - -Having become a united nation, Italy soon developed Imperialistic -ambitions. She looked towards Tunis, but was forestalled there by -France in 1881. In 1884, being secure from an attack by land, by an -alliance with Austria concluded in 1882, and being assured by Great -Britain that the occupation by a friendly Power of certain positions on -the Red Sea littoral would not be regarded unfavourably, the Italian -Government decided on a forward policy in Africa. - - -Occasion: - -After a preliminary expedition in 1887, which was unsuccessful and had -to be recalled, a treaty was made with Menelek, after the death of King -John of Abyssinia, which was interpreted in Italy as involving Italian -suzerainty over Abyssinia. Italy supported Menelek against his rival -Ras Mangascia. - - -Course of the War: - -Italian victories over the Dervishes at Agordat (1893) and Cassala -(1894) encouraged the ambition of Italy for a vast African Empire. -On a further Italian advance in 1895 the Abyssinians united in their -resistance. Menelek repudiated all idea of a protectorate, and General -Baratieri suffered a disastrous defeat at Adowah, March 1, 1896. - - -Political Result: - -The Italian suzerainty over Abyssinia was abandoned, and by the Treaty -of Peace signed in September 1900, the frontiers of the Italian colony -were reduced. - - -Remarks: - -The attempt on the part of Italy to hunt with the lions in colonial -aggrandizement ended in humiliation. Italy was now able to devote its -attention to much-needed internal reforms. But the Imperialist policy -only died down to be revived later. - - - - -THE WAR IN THE SOUDAN - -1896–1898 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain--Egypt. - Arabs and Dervishes. - - -Cause: - -The Soudan had fallen into the hands of rebellious tribes under the -Mahdi. In 1883 on Egyptian force under General Hicks had been defeated -at El Obeid, and General Baker was also defeated in his attempt to -relieve the Tokar garrison. The successes of a British force near -Suakin were rendered useless by the refusal of the British Government -to advance further. Early in 1884 it was decided to despatch General -Gordon, who had an intimate knowledge of the country, to bring away -Europeans from the Soudan. On arriving at Khartoum he was cut off from -all communication with Egypt, Berber and the Bahr-el-Gazal province -having fallen into the hands of the Mahdi. The relief expedition was -sent out too late to save him. Khartoum fell, and Gordon was killed -on January 25, 1885. The whole of the Soudan remained under the rule -of the Mahdi for thirteen years. The British Government came to the -conclusion that Egypt could never be considered permanently secure so -long as a hostile Power was in occupation of Khartoum. - - -Occasion: - -After the Italian defeat at Adowah it was decided to create a diversion -in Italian interests, and orders were given to occupy the province -of Dongola. Rumours of the crumbling power of the Khalifa, who had -succeeded the Mahdi, strengthened the idea that it was a favourable -opportunity to advance into the Soudan. - - -Course of the War: - -British and Egyptian troops under Kitchener occupied Dongola September -23, 1896. In 1897 desert railways were constructed, and Abu Hamed -and Berber were wrested from the dervishes. In 1898 reinforcements -of British troops were sent from Cairo. Omdurman, the stronghold of -Mahdism, was captured on September 2, 1898, and two days later Khartoum -was occupied. - - -Political Result: - -By an agreement between the British and Egyptian Governments in -January 1899, the Soudan was placed under their joint control, -the Governor-General to be appointed by the Khedive on British -recommendation. - - -Remarks: - -The arrival of Major Marchand at Fashoda, in September 1898, where -he hoisted the French flag, created a momentary excitement and talk -of war, but the British Government adopted a firm attitude, and he -received orders to withdraw. - -No opposition to the Anglo-Egyptian agreement was encountered in -Europe. The economic and agricultural development of the Soudan has -since progressed rapidly. - -Nearly a million square miles were added to the territory under British -rule. - - - - -THE TURKO-GREEK WAR - -1897 - - -Belligerents: - - Turkey. - Greece. - - -Cause: - -Crete, which formed part of the Ottoman Dominion, had been granted -a Constitution in 1868. A revolt in 1889 caused the Sultan to limit -the powers of the assembly and supersede the Christian governor by a -Mussulman. Disturbances broke out between Christians and Mohammedans -in the succeeding years. In February 1897 the Christians proclaimed -union with Greece, and Colonel Vassos was sent with a force to occupy -the island in the King’s name. The Powers intervened, and the Admirals -occupied Canea. Neither the Sultan nor the King wanted war. The King -was under the impression that the Powers would prevent it. - - -Occasion: - -Enthusiasm for war which was not accompanied by any sort of military -organization or preparation grew up in Greece. When armed bands crossed -the frontier into Macedonia, Turkey immediately declared war (April 17, -1897). - - -Course of the War: - -The Greek fleet, on which great hopes had been placed, effected -nothing. The Turkish forces occupied Larissa, advanced across Thessaly, -defeated the Greeks all along the line, and on May 17, 1897, the -victory of Domokos opened to the Turks the pass which leads down to -Lamia. The Powers intervened, and a armistice was signed. - - -Political Result: - -By the treaty of peace signed at Constantinople, December 4, 1897, -the Turks evacuated Thessaly, and certain strategic alterations were -made in the frontier. Greece paid an indemnity of four millions, and -accepted the European control of her finances. Crete continued to be -the arena of periodic conflict. Prince George of Greece was appointed -High Commissioner of the Powers under a new Constitution, but he -resigned in 1906. While virtually Greek the island remained under the -suzerainty of the Sultan. - - -Remarks: - -This was only one of the many Balkan conflicts. The intervention of -the Powers was invoked in order to check any increase in the dominion -of the Sultan. But owing to their own conflicting ambitions and the -inherent racial complications in the Balkans, they never at any time -reached a solution of the problems involved. - - - - -THE SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR - -1897–1898 - - -Belligerents: - - Spain. - The United States of America. - - -Cause: - -The decline of the Spanish Colonial Empire (which had reached its -highest point under Philip II at the end of the sixteenth century) -continued throughout the seventeenth, eighteenth, and early nineteenth -century, and was hastened by the misgovernment, corruption, and -incessant outbreaks of revolution in Spain itself. One by one by -means of revolution, the Spanish-American colonies had gained their -independence. The policy of the Holy Alliance and of Metternich was -to check the growth of Constitutional government in Europe. King -Ferdinand of Spain was in conflict with the constitutional movement, -and civil war prevailed. In 1823 France intervened in Spain on behalf -of Ferdinand, and French troops entered Madrid. Canning, on behalf of -Great Britain, prohibited the conquest by France or her allies of the -Spanish colonies, and formally recognized their independence in 1824. -Cuba and other islands were the last of the Spanish possessions. During -the remainder of the nineteenth century Spain continued periodically to -be torn and weakened by internal disturbances. - - -Occasion: - -In order to quell the revolts in Cuba more effectually the milder -policy of Martinez Campos was exchanged in 1897 for the ruthless and -brutal rule of General Weyler. The United States were deeply stirred -by the torture and starvation of their neighbours. General Weyler was -recalled. But when the American cruiser _Maine_ was blown up in the -port of Havana, the United States demanded the evacuation of Cuba by -Spain. Spain refused. - - -Course of the War: - -Two Spanish fleets were destroyed in May and July 1898, and American -land forces in Cuba, the Philippines, and Porto Rico won those islands -with comparatively little struggle. - - -Political Result: - -By the treaty of peace signed at Paris, December 1898, Spain -surrendered practically all her colonies. The Caroline Islands in the -Pacific were sold to Germany in 1899. - - -Remarks: - -This was the last chapter in the extinction of a vast colonial Empire, -which was dissolved owing to the spirit of independence in its various -states and the bad government in the Mother Country. - - - - -THE BOER WAR - -1881, 1899–1902 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain. - The Transvaal and Orange Free State. - - -Cause: - -The premature annexation of the Transvaal in 1877 was resented by the -majority of the Boers. In 1880 a formidable rebellion broke out, a -small British force was sent out which met with determined opposition -at Laing’s Nek and Ingogo, and on February 27, 1881, was defeated at -Majuba Hill. The Boers regained their independence under the suzerainty -of Great Britain. - -Cecil Rhodes, with vast ideas of Imperial expansion, became the -dominating influence in South Africa. In 1884 Bechuanaland was -annexed. In 1889 Rhodes founded the British South Africa Company. In -1896, after a successful conflict with the Matabeles, Buluwayo was -captured and Matabeleland added to the territory of Rhodesia. In 1886 -gold had been discovered in the Transvaal, and a great cosmopolitan -city arose at Johannesburg. This resulted in an enormous influx of -Europeans and the decision of the Boers to exclude them from any share -in the political life of the country. Behind Rhodes, who became Prime -Minister of Cape Colony in 1895, great financial interests grew up and -exerted considerable influence. Under the presidency of Kruger the -Boers adopted a more and more hostile attitude towards the Outlanders. -In 1895 the Jameson Raid, which was connived at by the authorities, -revived Kruger’s power, which had been waning, and made the Boers arm -in preparation for a further surprise. - - -Occasion: - -A promise of intervention was sent by the British Government in -reply to a petition from the Outlanders in 1899. Attempts to reach a -compromise with Kruger failed. Both sides were preparing for war, and -the mining interests exerted great pressure. On October 9, 1899, the -Transvaal issued an Ultimatum. - - -Course of the War: - -The Boers invaded Natal and Cape Colony; Ladysmith, Mafeking, and -Kimberley were invested. British defeats at Magersfontein, Stormberg, -and Colenso (December 1899) led to Lord Roberts being sent out to -supersede General Buller. Kimberley and Ladysmith were relieved, -Bloemfontein fell. In May 1900 Mafeking was relieved, and in June -Johannesburg and Pretoria were occupied. The attempt to insist on -unconditional surrender prolonged the war for two more years. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Vereeniging_, May 1902, the Transvaal lost its -independence. The Orange Free State had been annexed in 1900. Under -pressure from the financial interests Chinese were introduced to work -the gold-mines. This was one of the chief reasons for the fall of the -Conservative Government in 1906. Campbell-Bannerman, who became Prime -Minister, solved the problem of the future of the Transvaal by granting -them full self-government, and the importation of Chinese was stopped. - - -Remarks: - -The origin of the war can be directly traced to far less worthy -causes than that of redressing the grievances of the Outlanders. The -war was unnecessarily prolonged by an underestimate of the strength -of the Boers and the desire to humiliate them. But the grant of -self-government was the act that saved the war from being barren in -results and from being the precursor of further trouble. The Union of -South Africa was established in 1909. - -The Powers of Europe, with the exception of Italy, adopted an -unfriendly attitude towards Great Britain during the war. - - - - -THE BOXER RISING IN CHINA - -1899–1900 - - -Belligerents: - - Great Britain, Russia, Germany, France, and Japan. - China. - - -Cause: - -The humiliating results of the war of 1894–5 (p. 72) killed the reform -movement in China and brought the reactionary party, headed by the -Dowager-Empress, back to power. A society called the Boxers spread -very rapidly through the provinces, preaching death to foreigners and -receiving official support. - - -Occasion: - -Attacks on Europeans began in 1899, and became very frequent in -the early months of 1900. In May the Ministers at Peking asked for -additional guards. The Boxers surrounded the city, and Admiral -Seymour’s attempt to reach the capital was frustrated. The destruction -of the Taku Fort by the Allies was treated as a declaration of war, and -Chinese Imperial troops joined the Boxers. - - -Course of the War: - -The settlements at Tientsin were rescued by a Russian force. An -allied force made its way through from Taku, and forced an entry into -Pekin. In August a relief column of 18,000 allied troops defeated the -Chinese in several engagements and marched on Pekin. The legations -had for eight weeks withstood a siege. The Chinese Government gave -foreigners twenty-four hours to leave the capital. The German Minister -was murdered in the street. The British Legation formed the refuge of -all those who were driven out of their places of retreat. When the -relieving force arrived the Chinese only made a faint-hearted defence. -The Empress fled, the legations were relieved, and Pekin was occupied. - - -Political Result: - -By the peace protocol, which was signed on September 7, 1901, the -punishment of the ringleaders was demanded: the forts between Pekin -and the sea were dismantled, permanent guards for the legations were -established, and a large indemnity was fixed. - - -Remarks: - -Official intercourse with the Chinese Government was established on -a more satisfactory basis. But serious trouble in the Far East and -internal disturbances in China itself continued. - - - - -THE RUSSO-JAPANESE WAR - -1904–1905 - - -Belligerents: - - Russia. - Japan. - - -Cause: - -When Port Arthur, which Japan had been forced to surrender in 1895, was -seized by Russia there was deep indignation in Japan. In 1902 a treaty -of alliance was concluded between Great Britain and Japan. Russia -undertook to evacuate Manchuria, and although the withdrawal of troops -began in 1903, instead of continuing the evacuation Russia demanded -new concessions. In Korea Russian speculators obtained concessions, -and influential members of the Russian Court were interested in the -enterprise. Japan protested. - - -Occasion: - -A treaty regulating the position in Manchuria and Korea was suggested -by Japan, but Russia refused to recognize Japan’s paramount influence -in Korea, and after several months of fruitless negotiation Japan -issued an Ultimatum in February 1904. - - -Course of the War: - -After successful initial encounters on the part of Japan, Port Arthur -was surrendered on January 1, 1905. After a Japanese victory at Mukden, -the Russians retreated. In October 1904 the Russian fleet, coming -round from the Baltic, opened fire on a group of Hull fishing smacks -in crossing the Dogger Bank, mistaking them for torpedo boats. The -incident roused considerable indignation in Britain, but the Czar -expressed his regrets. The matter was referred to a commission of -admirals in Paris, and compensation was awarded for the damage done. -On May 27, 1905 the Russian fleet was annihilated by Admiral Togo at -Tsushima. The Japanese landed a force in Sakhalin, but, both sides -being exhausted and anxious for peace, negotiations were opened in -August 1905. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Portsmouth_, August 1905, the claims of Japan in -Korea were recognized; Russia agreed to evacuate Manchuria and ceded -the Liao-Tung peninsula (including Port Arthur) and the southern half -of Sakhalin to Japan. The payment of an indemnity, which had been the -chief obstacle to the conclusion of peace, was waived by Japan. The -moderation of the Japanese demands made a good impression in the world, -but was resented in Japan itself. - - -Remarks: - -This was a war of pure aggression, backed by high financial speculation -on the part of Russia. The easy triumph of Japan was a surprise. But -she was fighting for definite national objects, while the Russian -people knew nothing of the cause and aims of the war. Russia spent much -money in subsequent years in restoring her lost armaments. From this -time on the reform movements and revolutionary spirit in Russia grew -rapidly. - - - - -TURKO-ITALIAN WAR - -1911–1912 - - -Belligerents: - - Italy. - Turkey. - - -Cause: - -After the agreements with regard to North Africa between Great Britain -and France, Italy made up her mind that the time was favourable for a -decisive move with a view to expansion, and proceeded to make careful -preparations for military action early in 1911. The position in Tripoli -was made the subject of heated discussion in the Press, and the Turks -were charged with showing gross unfairness to Italian residents. The -possible designs of Germany in North Africa also induced the Italian -Government to take advantage of the first opportunity for an offensive -step. - - -Occasion: - -The Turks, foreseeing danger, sent war stores and munitions to Tripoli, -and on September 29, 1911, the Italians, with their fleet ready and -their troops embarked, declared war. - - -Course of the War: - -On September 30th, Tripoli was blockaded and occupied by the Italians -on October 5th; Benghazi fell on October 20th. In spite of the -publication of a decree annexing Tripoli as a province of Italy, the -advance of the invaders was kept in check. Austria refused to allow -operations in the Adriatic. Russia would not permit the blockade of the -Dardanelles. Fighting continued with indeterminate results and in a -desultory manner until a treaty of peace was finally signed at Ouchy on -October 15, 1912. - - -Result: - -By the _Treaty of Lausanne_, October 15, 1912, Turkish forces were -withdrawn from Tripoli and Cyrenaica, the Italians promised to withdraw -from the occupied islands of the Ægean, and a commercial agreement was -concluded between the two countries. There was no recognition by the -Turkish Government of Italian sovereignty in Tripoli. It was enough for -Italy that her sovereignty was recognized by the Powers. This was done, -France delaying her assent until Italy surrendered certain privileges -in Morocco. - - -Remarks: - -Italy’s aggressive action was prompted by a desire not to be left -behind in the competition for territorial acquisitions in Africa. - - - - -FIRST BALKAN WAR - -1912–1913 - - -Belligerents: - - Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece, Montenegro. - Turkey. - - -Cause: - -Even after the deposition of the Sultan, Abdul Hamid, and the triumph -of the Young Turks in the revolution of 1908 the misgovernment of -Turkey did not cease, more especially in Macedonia, where the European -Powers had entirely failed to secure any reforms, but produced an -intolerable situation in the Balkan Peninsula. Despairing of the -successful intervention of the Powers the Balkan States determined -to take matters into their own hands. For the first time an alliance -was formed between Greece, Bulgaria, and Serbia for the purpose of -destroying the Turkish Empire in Europe. - - -Occasion: - -In September 1912 the Powers, through Austria, Hungary, and Russia -strongly deprecated the outbreak of war. The Allies simultaneously -handed in to the Turkish Government an Ultimatum demanding certain -specified reforms. No reply was sent. The Turks underestimated the -strength of their opponents, and hoped to detach Greece. War broke out -October 17th. - - -Course of the War: - -The Turkish forces were completely overwhelmed. They were defeated by -the Serbians at Kumanovo, October 24, 1912, and Uskub was occupied: the -Greeks drove the enemy north and occupied Salonika: and the Bulgarians -defeated the Ottoman army at Lule Burgas, October 31st, and advanced to -Chatalja. After an armistice and an abortive attempt of the Powers to -secure peace, the war broke out again. Adrianople fell March 26, 1913, -and the Turks submitted. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of London_ Bulgaria was given a frontier from Enos on -the Mediterranean to Midia on the Black Sea. The future of Albania was -to be decided by the Allies and Turkey ceded the island of Crete to -Greece. - - -Remarks: - -Serious disputes as to the disposal of the spoils won from Turkey led -immediately to the outbreak of war among the Allies. - - - - -SECOND BALKAN WAR - -1913 - - -Belligerents: - - Serbia, Greece, Montenegro, Roumania. - Bulgaria. - Turkey. - - -Cause: - -In February 1912 a treaty was concluded between Bulgaria and Serbia, -whereby it was agreed that North-west Macedonia should go to Serbia, -another part to Bulgaria, and the zone lying between these two should -be submitted to the arbitration of the Czar. In December 1912, in the -First Balkan War, Austria protested against the occupation by Serbia of -Durazzo on the Adriatic, and of Scutari by Montenegro. Serbia declared -that Bulgaria did not adequately support her in resisting the Austrian -demand, felt impelled to claim more territory in Macedonia, and refused -to carry out the provisions of the treaty with Bulgaria. Serbia was -ready to arbitrate. Russia was inclined to support the Serbian claim. -Bulgaria hesitated. - - -Occasion: - -While the dispute was still in the balance the aggressive party in -Bulgaria got the upper hand, and war was declared against Serbia and -Greece in June 24, 1913, only a few months after the cessation of -hostilities in the First Balkan War. - - -Course of the War: - -The Bulgarians found themselves invaded on four frontiers. While they -were being driven back by Serbia and Greece, the Turks repudiated the -Treaty of London and retook Adrianople, and Roumania advanced from the -north and without striking a blow annexed a large slice of territory in -the Dobrudja. Bulgaria was obliged to yield. - - -Political Result: - -By the _Treaty of Bukarest_, August 10, 1913, Serbia acquired a large -district of South-east Macedonia, Greece obtained Kavalla, and Roumania -was given possession of the territory her troops had occupied. - -By the _Treaty of Constantinople_, August 1913, Bulgaria ceded back -to Turkey more than half of the territory won in the previous war, -including Adrianople. - - -Remarks: - -Bulgaria being again restricted in territory felt she had been betrayed -by the Powers, who did nothing to enforce the engagements of the Treaty -of London. Her rivals, Serbia and Greece, gained at her expense. On the -other hand, Bulgarian responsibility for the outbreak of the second war -was undoubted. - -The European Powers, by acting together, prevented the Balkan conflict -from spreading into a European War. But the Treaty of Bukarest was no -settlement, and was a signal exposure of their inability to solve the -Balkan problem, which was destined to be the spark for a world-wide -conflagration. - - - - -IMPORTANT TREATIES - -(OTHER THAN THOSE ALREADY MENTIONED) - - - The _Treaty of Vienna_, June 9, 1815. - - _Second Treaty of Paris_, November 20, 1815, Signed by Great Britain, - Austria, Prussia, Russia, France at the conclusion of the - Napoleonic Wars. - - France gave up certain fortresses on the frontier but retained - Alsace-Lorraine. Payment of 700 million francs was exacted from - France. The greater part of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw fell - to Russia, Posen to Prussia, and Cracow became a republic. - Prussia got back nearly all her old possessions, and there was a - reconstruction of German States under a Confederation. Holland, - Belgium, and Luxemburg were established as an independent - kingdom under the House of Orange: Switzerland was extended and - her integrity guaranteed: Sardinia obtained Genoa and other - territory: Austria received an extension of territory in North - Italy and on the coast of the Adriatic, and became the dominant - state in the German Confederation. The Pope and the King of the - Two Sicilies regained their former possessions. - - [The foregoing record of wars serves to show to what a small - extent this treaty secured the settlement of European territorial - problems.] - - _The Rushe-Bagot Treaty_, April 1817, between Great Britain and - the United States. The two powers agreed to withdraw their - battleships from the Great Lakes. - - It may be noted that the absence of armaments on the whole - Canadian frontier cannot be said to have endangered the relations - between the two countries in view of the fact that the - Anglo-American peace centenary was celebrated in 1915. - - _The Treaty of Washington_, May 8, 1871, between Great Britain and - the United States. The north-western boundary was finally - delimited: an attempt was made to settle the Canadian Fishery - dispute, and it was agreed to refer the Alabama Claims to a - tribunal of arbitration, which subsequently fixed the sum to be - paid over by Great Britain as indemnity. - - _The Triple Alliance_ in 1882 was the result of Italy joining the - alliance between Germany and Austria, which had grown out of the - support given to Austria as against Russia at the Congress of - Berlin in 1878, Italy having become estranged from France after - the occupation of Tunis in 1881. The Triple Alliance was renewed - for five years in 1887 and in 1891, and again in 1902 it was - extended for a term of twelve years. - - _The Berlin Act._ The outcome of the Conference of Berlin, 1884–5, at - which fourteen Powers were represented. The respective spheres - of influence of the European Powers in Africa were delimited. - The neutrality of the Congo Free State was recognized, and it - was established as an independent State under the sovereignty of - the King of the Belgians. An area was marked out in which there - should be free trade, which should be excluded from effects of - disputes between the signatory Powers, and be placed under the - rule of neutrality. - - The latter stipulation has, however, not been carried out. - - _The Suez Canal Convention_ signed by nine Powers at Constantinople, - October 29, 1888. Lesseps obtained the preliminary concession - for the construction of the Canal in 1856. The Canal was opened - in 1869. Disraeli bought four million pounds’ worth of shares - from the Khedive on behalf of the British Government in 1875. - The Convention ensured that the Canal should always be open to - vessels of commerce and war without distinction of flag. Great - Britain signed with a reservation, but in the Anglo-French - agreement of 1904 declared her adherence to the Convention and - agreed to its being put into force. - - _The Hay-Pauncefote Treaty_, November 18, 1901, between Great Britain - and the United States, gave the United States right of control - in time of war of the Panama Canal. The Clayton-Bulwer Treaty of - 1850, which established a joint Anglo-American protectorate over - the Canal was thereby abrogated. - - _The Anglo-Japanese Alliance._ Treaties signed in London January 30, - 1902, and August 12, 1905. The integrity and independence of - China was recognized. If either Great Britain or Japan should - be attacked and involved in a war with two Powers, they engaged - mutually to assist one another. The aim of the alliance was - officially defined as “the consolidation and maintenance of - general peace in the regions of Eastern Asia and of India.” In - 1911 the treaty was revised, a clause stipulating that there - was no obligation to go to war with a Power with whom a treaty - of arbitration was in force. This removed the danger of Great - Britain being involved in a war between Japan and the United - States. - - _The Argentine-Chile Treaty_, 1902. From 1840 to 1900 constant - boundary disputes arose between the two countries, which - invariably led to war. At last the people themselves in both - countries decided by large majorities to negotiate a peaceful - settlement of the dispute. The delimitation of the frontier was - carried out by a mixed commission, and to commemorate the treaty - an immense statue of Christ was erected on a high pass in the - Andes on the boundary line. - - _The Anglo-French Convention_, April 8, 1904. - - This removed outstanding causes of friction between the two - countries, and was the foundation of the Entente. - - Newfoundland fisheries and West African boundary problems were - settled: the Siamese, New Hebrides, and Madagascar disputes were - settled: Egypt was declared exclusively under British protection, - and Morocco was left to France. A Franco-Spanish Convention was - concluded in October of the same year with regard to Morocco. To - both these treaties secret clauses were attached which amounted - virtually to the prospective partition of Morocco by France and - Spain. - - _The Agreement of Karlstadt_, September 23, 1905. - - The Union between Sweden and Norway was dissolved, and Norway - recognized as an independent kingdom. - - The movement in favour of separation had grown rapidly from 1899. - It was resisted by the King of Sweden. A plebiscite in Norway - declared in favour of it, and agreement was reached without any - armed conflict. - - _The Algeciras Act_, April 7, 1906, agreed to by thirteen Powers, was - based on the sovereignty, independence, integrity, and economic - liberty of Morocco. The provisions concerned the organization - of police, regulation of taxation, customs, etc. This Act was - disregarded by France in 1911, when a French force was sent to - Fez and occupied the country. - - _The Anglo-Russian Convention_, September 23, 1907. - - Persia was divided so as to give Great Britain and Russia spheres - of influence with a neutral zone between. (Persia was not a party - to the treaty.) An agreement was come to with regard to - Afghanistan and Thibet, settling all points where dispute might - arise. - - _The Anglo-American Arbitration Treaty_, April 4, 1908. - - By this Treaty differences between Great Britain and the United - States which do not affect the vital interests, independence, - or honour of either country, or which do not concern the - interests of third parties are referred to the Permanent Court - of Arbitration at the Hague. - - - - -INDEX OF TREATIES - - - PAGE - Adrianople, Treaty of 15, 17 - - Akerman, Treaty of 16 - - Algeciras Act 101 - - Anglo-French Convention 100 - - Anglo-Japanese Alliance 100 - - Anglo-American Arbitration 101 - - Anglo-Russian Convention 101 - - Argentine-Chile Treaty 100 - - - Bardo, Treaty of 66 - - Berlin, Treaty of (1850) 48 - - Berlin, Treaty of (1878) 59 - - Berlin Act 99 - - Bukarest, Treaty of (1886) 75 - - Bukarest, Treaty of (1913) 97 - - - Constantinople, Treaty of (1897) 83 - - Constantinople, Treaty of (1913) 97 - - - Frankfort, Treaty of 55 - - - Gandamuk, Treaty of 58 - - Guadalupe-Hidalgo, Treaty of 30 - - - Hay-Pauncefote Treaty 100 - - - Karlstadt, Agreement of 101 - - - La Marsa, Treaty of 66 - - Lausanne, Treaty of 93 - - London, Treaty of (1834) 21 - - London, Treaty of (1839) 19 - - London, Treaty of (1852) 49 - - London, Treaty of (1913) 95 - - - Nanking, Treaty of 28 - - - Paris, Treaty of (1815) 98 - - Paris, Treaty of (1856) 37 - - Paris, Treaty of (1898) 85 - - Portsmouth, Treaty of 91 - - Prague, Treaty of 51 - - - Rushe-Bagot Treaty 98 - - - San Stefano, Treaty of 59 - - Shimonoseki, Treaty of 77 - - Suez Canal Convention 99 - - - Tientsin, Treaty of 66 - - Triple Alliance 99 - - - Unkiar Skelessi, Treaty of 24 - - - Vereenigen, Treaty of 87 - - Vienna, Treaty of (1815) 98 - - Vienna, Treaty of (1866) 35 - - Villa Franca, Treaty of 35 - - - Washington, Treaty of 43, 98 - - - Zurich, Treaty of 35 - - - - -BIBLIOGRAPHY - -(_Each war has its own literature. Only a few leading authorities and -books easily accessible to students are given here._) - - - The Cambridge Modern History, vols. xi, xii. - - Modern Europe. C. A. Fyffe. - - A Political History of Contemporary Europe. Seignobos. - - History of our own Times. Justin McCarthy. - - A Century of British Foreign Policy. Gooch and Masterman. - - History of our Time (1885–1911). G. P. Gooch. - - Wars of the Nineties. Atteridge. - - The Map of Europe by Treaty. Hertslet. - - International Law. C. E. Hall. - - The Termination of War and Treaties of Peace. Coleman Philipson. - - Three Centuries of Treaties of Peace. Sir W. Philimore. - - Turkey in Europe. Sir C. Eliot. - - Nationality and War in the Near East. A Diplomatist. - - The New Map of Europe. H. A. Gibbons. - - Historical Atlas of Modern Europe. Robertson and Bartholomew. - - The Balkan War. Lieut.-Col. Rankine. - - History of the Greek Revolution. G. Finlay. - - History of Italian Unity. Bolton King. - - The Far Eastern Question. M. V. Chirol. - - The History of South America. Akers. - - The American Civil War. F. L. Paxon. - - The Downfall of Spain. Wilson. - - The Invasion of the Crimea. A. W. Kinglake. - - Modern Egypt. Lord Cromer. - - The War in South Africa. Hobson. - - The War of Steel and Gold. H. N. Brailsford. - - Nationalism, War, and Society. E. Krehbiel. - - Ten Years of Secret Diplomacy. E. D. Morel. - - Imperialism. J. A. Hobson. - - International Tribunals. Evans Darby. - - -_Printed in Great Britain by_ - -UNWIN BROTHERS, LIMITED, THE GRESHAM PRESS, WOKING AND LONDON - - - - -Transcriber’s Notes - - -Italic text is encloseed in _underscores_. - -Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent when a -predominant preference was found in the original book; otherwise they -were not changed. - -Simple typographical errors were corrected; unbalanced quotation -marks were remedied when the change was obvious, and otherwise left -unbalanced. - -Text sometimes uses colons where current convention is to use -semi-colons. - -The index was not checked for proper alphabetization or correct page -references. - -Page 9: The Austro-Prussian War began in 1866, not in 1860. The error -has not been corrected here. - -Page 43: “Savanah” was printed that way. - -Page 86: “Buluwayo” was printed that way. - - - - - -End of Project Gutenberg's Wars & Treaties, 1815-1914, by Arthur Ponsonby - -*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WARS & TREATIES, 1815-1914 *** - -***** This file should be named 60026-0.txt or 60026-0.zip ***** -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: - http://www.gutenberg.org/6/0/0/2/60026/ - -Produced by Turgut Dincer, Charlie Howard, and the Online -Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This -file was produced from images generously made available -by The Internet Archive) - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will -be renamed. - -Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright -law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, -so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United -States without permission and without paying copyright -royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part -of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm -concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, -and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive -specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this -eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook -for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, -performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given -away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks -not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the -trademark license, especially commercial redistribution. - -START: FULL LICENSE - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full -Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at -www.gutenberg.org/license. - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or -destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your -possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a -Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound -by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the -person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph -1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this -agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the -Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection -of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual -works in the collection are in the public domain in the United -States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the -United States and you are located in the United States, we do not -claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, -displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as -all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope -that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting -free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm -works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the -Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily -comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the -same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when -you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are -in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, -check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this -agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, -distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any -other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no -representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any -country outside the United States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other -immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear -prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work -on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, -performed, viewed, copied or distributed: - - This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and - most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no - restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it - under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this - eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the - United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you - are located before using this ebook. - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is -derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not -contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the -copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in -the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are -redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply -either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or -obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm -trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any -additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms -will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works -posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the -beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including -any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access -to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format -other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official -version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site -(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense -to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means -of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain -Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the -full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -provided that - -* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed - to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has - agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid - within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are - legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty - payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in - Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg - Literary Archive Foundation." - -* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all - copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue - all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm - works. - -* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of - any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of - receipt of the work. - -* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than -are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing -from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The -Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm -trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project -Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may -contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate -or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other -intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or -other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or -cannot be read by your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium -with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you -with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in -lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person -or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second -opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If -the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing -without further opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO -OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT -LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of -damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement -violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the -agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or -limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or -unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the -remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in -accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the -production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, -including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of -the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this -or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or -additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any -Defect you cause. - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of -computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It -exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations -from people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future -generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see -Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at -www.gutenberg.org Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by -U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the -mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its -volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous -locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt -Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to -date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and -official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -For additional contact information: - - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND -DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular -state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To -donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project -Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be -freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and -distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of -volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in -the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not -necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper -edition. - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search -facility: www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. - diff --git a/old/60026-0.zip b/old/60026-0.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 4f810ce..0000000 --- a/old/60026-0.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/60026-h.zip b/old/60026-h.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index ca173b1..0000000 --- a/old/60026-h.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/60026-h/60026-h.htm b/old/60026-h/60026-h.htm deleted file mode 100644 index 94b54ce..0000000 --- a/old/60026-h/60026-h.htm +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5005 +0,0 @@ -<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" - "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> -<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> - <head> - <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" /> - <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> - <title> - The Project Gutenberg eBook of Wars and Treaties 1815 to 1914, by Arthur Ponsonby. - </title> - <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" /> - <style type="text/css"> - -body { - margin-left: 2.5em; - margin-right: 2.5em; -} - -h1, h2 { - text-align: center; - clear: both; - margin-top: 2.5em; - margin-bottom: 1em; -} - -h1 {line-height: 1;} - -h2+p {margin-top: 1.5em;} -h2 .subhead {display: block; margin-top: .5em; margin-bottom: 1em;} -h3 {text-align: left; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 0; font-weight: bold;} - -div.main p {margin-left: 2em; text-indent: 1.25em;} -.main p.bellig {text-indent: 0; padding-left: 1em;} - -.transnote h2 { - margin-top: .5em; - margin-bottom: 1em; -} - -.subhead { - text-indent: 0; - text-align: center; - font-size: smaller; -} - -p { - text-indent: 1.75em; - margin-top: .51em; - margin-bottom: .24em; - text-align: justify; -} -.caption p {text-align: center; text-indent: 0;} -p.center {text-indent: 0;} - -.p1 {margin-top: 1em;} -.p2 {margin-top: 2em;} -.p4 {margin-top: 4em;} -.b2 {margin-bottom: 2em;} -.vspace {line-height: 1.5;} - -.in0 {text-indent: 0;} - -.small {font-size: 70%;} -.smaller {font-size: 85%;} -.larger {font-size: 125%;} -.large {font-size: 150%;} -.xxlarge {font-size: 200%;} -.center {text-align: center;} - -.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} -.smcap.smaller {font-size: 75%;} - -hr { - width: 50%; - margin-top: 4em; - margin-bottom: 4em; - margin-left: 25%; - margin-right: auto; - clear: both; -} -hr.wide { - width: 100%; - margin: 2em 0 2em 0; - border: thin solid black; -} - -.tb { - text-align: center; - padding-top: .76em; - padding-bottom: .24em; - letter-spacing: 1.5em; - margin-right: -1.5em; -} - -table { - margin-left: auto; - margin-right: auto; - max-width: 80%; - border-collapse: collapse; -} - -#toc td {padding-bottom: .4em;} -#toc .small td, #toc .b0 td {padding-bottom: 0;} -#index td {padding-bottom: .4em;} -#index .small td {padding-bottom: 0;} -#index .first td {padding-top: 1em;} - -.tdl { - text-align: left; - vertical-align: top; - padding-right: 1em; - padding-left: 1.5em; - text-indent: -1.5em; -} - -#toc .tdl {padding-right: 0;} -#toc td.tdl.tall {padding: 0 .5em 0 0; text-indent: 0; font-size: 175%; line-height: .5;} - -.tdc {text-align: center;} -#toc .tdc {text-align: left; padding-left: 1.4em;} - -.tdr { - text-align: right; - vertical-align: bottom; - padding-left: .3em; - white-space: nowrap; -} -#toc .tdr {padding-left: 1em;} - -.tdl.mid, .tdr.mid {vertical-align: middle;} -table#toc {max-width: 30em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;} -#toc .tdl.dates {width: 8em;} -#toc .tdl.brackets {width: 1.6em;} - -.pagenum { - position: absolute; - right: 4px; - text-indent: 0em; - text-align: right; - font-size: 70%; - font-weight: normal; - font-variant: normal; - font-style: normal; - letter-spacing: normal; - line-height: normal; - color: #acacac; - border: 1px solid #acacac; - background: #ffffff; - padding: 1px 2px; -} - -.figcenter { - margin: 2em auto 2em auto; - text-align: center; - page-break-inside: avoid; - max-width: 100%; -} - -img { - padding: 0; - max-width: 100%; - height: auto; -} - -.footnote { - border: thin dashed black; - margin: 1.5em 10%; - padding: .5em 1em .5em 1.5em; -} - -.footnote {font-size: .95em;} -.footnote p {text-indent: 1em;} - -.fnanchor { - vertical-align: 60%; - line-height: .7; - font-size: smaller; - text-decoration: none; -} -.footnote .fnanchor {font-size: .8em;} - -blockquote { - margin-left: 5%; - margin-right: 5%; - font-size: 95%; -} - -.treaties blockquote p {text-indent: -5%; font-size: 100%;} -.treaties blockquote p.in {text-indent: 1.25em;} - -.transnote { - background-color: #999999; - border: thin dotted; - font-family: sans-serif, serif; - margin-left: 5%; - margin-right: 5%; - margin-top: 4em; - margin-bottom: 2em; - padding: 1em; -} -.covernote {visibility: hidden; display: none;} - -.wspace {word-spacing: .3em;} - -span.locked {white-space:nowrap;} - -.narrow {max-width: 35em; margin: auto;} -.bt {border-top: thin solid black; padding-top: .4em;} - -@media print, handheld -{ - h1, .chapter, .newpage {page-break-before: always;} - h1.nobreak, h2.nobreak, .nobreak {page-break-before: avoid; padding-top: 0;} - - p { - margin-top: .5em; - text-align: justify; - margin-bottom: .25em; - } - - table {width: 100%; max-width: 100%;} - - .tdl { - padding-left: 1em; - text-indent: -1em; - padding-right: 0; - } -} - -@media handheld -{ - body {margin: 0;} - - hr { - margin-top: .1em; - margin-bottom: .1em; - visibility: hidden; - color: white; - width: .01em; - display: none; - } - - blockquote {margin: 1.5em 3% 1.5em 3%;} - - .transnote { - page-break-inside: avoid; - margin-left: 2%; - margin-right: 2%; - margin-top: 1em; - margin-bottom: 1em; - padding: .5em; - } - - .covernote {visibility: visible; display: block; text-align: center;} -} - </style> - </head> - -<body> - - -<pre> - -The Project Gutenberg EBook of Wars & Treaties, 1815-1914, by Arthur Ponsonby - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and -most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions -whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms -of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at -www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll -have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using -this ebook. - - - -Title: Wars & Treaties, 1815-1914 - -Author: Arthur Ponsonby - -Release Date: July 31, 2019 [EBook #60026] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: UTF-8 - -*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WARS & TREATIES, 1815-1914 *** - - - - -Produced by Turgut Dincer, Charlie Howard, and the Online -Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This -file was produced from images generously made available -by The Internet Archive) - - - - - - -</pre> - - -<div class="transnote covernote"> -<p class="in0"><span class="larger">Transcriber’s Note:</span><br /> -Cover created by Transcriber and placed in the Public Domain.</p> -</div> - -<h1 class="vspace wspace">WARS AND TREATIES<br /><span class="subhead">1815 to 1914</span></h1> - -<hr /> - -<div class="narrow"> -<p class="newpage p1 center large">DEMOCRACY <span class="smaller">AND</span> DIPLOMACY</p> - -<p class="p1 center">(3s. 6d. net)</p> - -<p class="p1 center vspace wspace b2">BY<br /> - -<span class="larger">ARTHUR PONSONBY</span></p> - -<p class="smaller">“It is the completest statement of the case for the democratic control -of foreign affairs which has been published, and contains a mass of facts -whose value cannot be exaggerated. We owe Mr. Ponsonby a great -debt for this work.”—<cite>Labour Leader.</cite></p> - -<p class="smaller">“... Mr. Ponsonby’s main contention is one which may and should -receive the hearty assent of many who disagree with him in detail. He -strongly urges the necessity in dealing with foreign affairs of ensuring -the co-operation and approval of the great mass of the people. He is -manifestly quite right.”—The late <span class="smcap">Lord Cromer</span> in The <cite>Spectator</cite>.</p> - -<hr class="wide" /> -<hr class="wide" /> - -<p class="center large">REBELS AND REFORMERS</p> - -<p class="p1 center">(6s. net)</p> - -<p class="p1 center vspace wspace b2">BY<br /> - -<span class="larger">ARTHUR & DOROTHEA PONSONBY</span></p> - -<p class="center b2">Savonarola—William the Silent—Tycho Brahe—Cervantes—<br /> -Giordano Bruno—Grotius—Voltaire—Hans Andersen—<br /> -Mazzini—W. Lloyd Garrison—Thoreau—Tolstoy</p> - -<p class="smaller">“Mr. and Mrs. Ponsonby’s book is intended for children or for those who -are too busy to read books in many volumes. But the interest of it lies -not in the necessarily short and simple narratives giving the story rather -than the ideas, although these are done clearly and with spirit, but in the -reflections which lie about those stories and lodge here and there in the -reader’s mind. Like all books worth reading this one is the outcome of a -mass of judgments and beliefs which may be very briefly expressed in the -work itself, but lend it the gift which in the case of human beings we call -personality.”—<cite>The Times Literary Supplement.</cite></p> - -<p class="smaller">“The story of these twelve lives is told in these pages—and told with -a most enticing simplicity and the happiest taste—in the hope of redressing -the balance between men of action and men of thought, and of showing -that this type of character and achievement can be made just as interesting -to the young as the more conventional hero of the history book.... -This book is more especially for the young, but it will be a delight also to -grown-up readers.”—<cite>The Nation.</cite></p> - -<p class="smaller">“The biographies are always well simplified and written in a clear and -pointed way. They are accompanied by portraits, which add not a little -to the work’s attractiveness as a book unusually well fitted to the needs -of young readers who are beginning to take an interest in history.”—<cite>The -Scotsman.</cite></p> -</div> - -<hr /> - -<p class="newpage p1 center xxlarge vspace wspace"> -WARS & TREATIES<br /> - -<span class="smaller">1815 to 1914</span></p> - -<p class="p2 center vspace"><span class="small">BY</span><br /> -<span class="larger">ARTHUR PONSONBY</span></p> - -<div class="figcenter" style="max-width: 7em;"> -<img src="images/title.jpg" width="110" height="110" alt="Publisher's logo" /> -</div> - -<p class="p2 center vspace"><span class="wspace">LONDON: GEORGE ALLEN & UNWIN LTD.</span><br /> -RUSKIN HOUSE 40 MUSEUM STREET, W.C. 1<br /> -<span class="wspace">NEW YORK THE MACMILLAN COMPANY</span></p> - -<hr /> - -<table class="newpage p4 narrow" summary="publication dates"> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><i>First published</i></td> - <td class="tdr"><i>April 1918</i></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><i>Reprinted</i></td> - <td class="tdr"><i>June 1918</i></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><i>Third Edition, revised and enlarged</i></td> - <td class="tdr"><i>January 1919</i></td></tr> -</table> - -<p class="p2 center">(<i>All rights reserved</i>)</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">5</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="CONTENTS">CONTENTS</h2> -</div> - -<table id="toc" summary="Contents"> - <tr class="small"> - <td class="dates"> </td> - <td class="brackets"> </td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdr">PAGE</td></tr> - <tr class="b0"> - <td> </td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Introduction</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_7">7</a></td></tr> - <tr class="small"> - <td class="tdc">YEAR</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1821–1828</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Greek War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_14">14</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1828–1829</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Russo-Turkish War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_16">16</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1830–1839</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">War between Holland and Belgium</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_18">18</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1830–1839</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">War in Portugal and Spain</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_20">20</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1831</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Russian Campaign in Poland</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_22">22</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1832–1841</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Turko-Egyptian War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_24">24</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1838–1842</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">First Afghan War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_26">26</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1840–1842</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Opium War in China</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_28">28</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1846–1848</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">American War With Mexico</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_30">30</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1848–1849</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Austro-Hungarian War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_32">32</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdc">1831</td> - <td class="tdl tall">}</td> - <td class="tdl mid" rowspan="4"><span class="smcap">Italian War of Liberation</span></td> - <td rowspan="4" class="mid tdr"><a href="#Page_34">34</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1848–1849</td> - <td class="tdl tall">}</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdc">1859</td> - <td class="tdl tall">}</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1866–1867</td> - <td class="tdl tall">}</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1854–1856</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Crimean War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_36">36</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1857–1858</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Indian Mutiny</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_38">38</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1857–1860</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Chinese War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_40">40</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1861–1865</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">American Civil War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_42">42</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1862–1867</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">French Expedition in Mexico</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_44">44</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1864–1870</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Brazilian War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_46">46</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1864</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Danish War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1866</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Austro-Prussian War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_50">50</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1867–1868</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">British Expedition in Abyssinia</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_52">52</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1870–1871</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Franco-German War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_54">54</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">6</span></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1873–1874</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">The Ashanti War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_56">56</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1877–1878</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Russo-Turkish War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_58">58</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1878–1881</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Second Afghan War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_60">60</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1879</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Zulu War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_62">62</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1879–1882</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">The Chile-Peruvian War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_64">64</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1881</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">French Expedition in Tunis</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_66">66</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1882</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Egyptian War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_68">68</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1884–1885</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Franco-Chinese War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_70">70</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1823–1826</td> - <td class="tdl tall">}</td> - <td class="tdl mid" rowspan="3"><span class="smcap">Burmese Wars</span></td> - <td rowspan="3" class="mid tdr"><a href="#Page_72">72</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdc">1851</td> - <td class="tdl tall">}</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdc">1885</td> - <td class="tdl tall">}</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1885</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Serbo-Bulgarian War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_74">74</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1894–1895</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Chino-Japanese War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_76">76</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1895–1896</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Italo-Abyssinian War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_78">78</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1896–1898</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">War in the Soudan</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_80">80</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1897</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Turko-Greek War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_82">82</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1897–1898</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Spanish-American War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_84">84</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdc">1881</td> - <td class="tdl tall">}</td> - <td class="tdl mid" rowspan="2"><span class="smcap">The Boer Wars</span></td> - <td rowspan="2" class="mid tdr"><a href="#Page_86">86</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1899–1902</td> - <td class="tdl tall">}</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1899–1900</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Boxer Rising in China</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_88">88</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1904–1905</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Russo-Japanese War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_90">90</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1911–1912</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Turko-Italian War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_92">92</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1912–1913</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">First Balkan War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_94">94</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1913</td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Second Balkan War</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_96">96</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td> </td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Important Treaties</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_98">98</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td> </td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Index of Treaties</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_102">102</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td> </td> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Bibliography</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#BIBLIOGRAPHY">104</a></td></tr> -</table> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">7</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="WARS_AND_TREATIES"><span class="larger wspace vspace">WARS AND TREATIES<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1815–1914</span></span></h2> -</div> - -<hr /> -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="INTRODUCTION" class="nobreak p2">INTRODUCTION</h2> -</div> - -<p class="in0"><span class="smcap">A growing</span> number of people are devoting their attention -to a closer study of foreign affairs. Many of them may -not have the opportunity to read the larger volumes of -histories; and, indeed, even if they had, they would find -their choice of books very much restricted when they -came to the more recent period of European and world -history, although in the last year or so the gap has to some -extent been filled up by several interesting studies of international -politics in the nineteenth century. Some knowledge -of this period is essential if we are to understand -the full significance of the events of to-day, and if we are -to form any helpful opinion of the course to be pursued -in future.</p> - -<p>Historians often take for granted that their readers -already have some general knowledge of the groundwork -of events and they build up their structure of criticism, -their delineation of policy and tendencies, and their survey -of international problems on the assumption that the -scaffolding has been erected. But often it has not, and -then history, more especially the complex tangle of international -history, becomes difficult to grasp. It may -therefore serve some useful purpose if a few poles of scaffolding -representing the dates and outline of conflicts -and agreements between nations can be supplied in a very -brief and easily intelligible form, a presentment of the -bare record of facts which may be useful for reference.</p> - -<p>During the last hundred years war has been a more -common occurrence in international intercourse than most -people realize. The forty-two records of wars tabled in -these pages do not cover the whole ground. They are<span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">8</span> -the chief conflicts, or the conflicts fraught with the most -serious consequences, but they are by no means the -only occasions on which there was fighting in the world. -Revolutions, unless they led to international war, are -not mentioned, neither are expeditions such as the advance -on Llassa, the Chitral expedition, the Indian frontier wars, -the Kaffir wars, the Somaliland expeditions, the revolt of -the Herreroes in German West Africa or the French -expeditions in Morocco: the wars between the states -of South America, with two exceptions, have also been -omitted. But the list as it stands, is striking enough and -may suffice to make the student inquire further into the -circumstances which produced this almost unceasing strife.</p> - -<p>The causes are epitomized in the fewest possible words -and the occasion is separated from the cause. Causes -of wars are very seldom remembered and are not very -easily discovered in the perusal of histories. The occasion -is sometimes mistaken for the cause, whereas it may often -be merely a pretext. The occasion of a war has not infrequently -been a comparatively trivial incident, whereas -the cause can be traced to the gradual development of -friction for which divergence of policies or conflict of ambitions -may have been responsible. The trivial incident, -or even an incident of a more serious nature, may pass off -without fatal consequences if no friction exists between -the nations and there is a general atmosphere of amicable -understanding. Where, on the contrary, relations are -strained it requires but a very small spark to light up a -conflagration. It is important therefore to detach the -occasion from the cause.</p> - -<p>Causes of war in the nineteenth century differ to some -extent from those of previous centuries. The elemental -combative passion of man expressing itself in fierce racial -animosities is far less noticeable. Religious differences -do not figure so positively as a reason for conflict. -Dynastic ambitions linger on and still play a formidable -part, even after 1815, but not with the same unashamed -and aggressive arrogance as in bygone centuries. Nationalist -aspirations begin to assert themselves, and the waves -of revolutionary exasperation with outworn systems of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">9</span> -despotic government have made those very governments -combat that spirit by force of arms. As the century proceeds, -and the wonderful inventions for rapid transit and -communication develop, the most noticeable element in -war-making is the commercial or colonial ambition of -governments fostered largely by the pressure of financial -interests and declaring itself under the name of Empire. -This policy of competitive imperial expansion in the newly -accessible regions of the globe will be found to constitute -the most frequent cause of dispute, of jealousy, and of -suspicion between nations. The pretext will vary, the -excuse will be presented under plausible guises for popular -consumption, but the ultimate cause, the fundamental -origin will be the same. Imperialism economic in its -origin is fostered largely by an exaggerated spirit of nationalism.</p> - -<p>The remarkable extent of Empire expansion in the -latter part of the nineteenth century is best illustrated -by the following <span class="locked">figures:—</span></p> - -<p class="p2 center"><i>Acquisitions of Territory</i></p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>To the British Empire 1870–1900: 4,754,000 square -miles; 88,000,000 population.</p> - -<p>To France 1884–1900: 3,583,580 square miles; -36,553,000 population.</p> - -<p>To Germany 1884–1900: 1,026,220 square miles; -16,687,100 population.</p></blockquote> - -<p>But perhaps the chief and most frequent cause of war -is war itself. In the Balkan Peninsula—where, whenever -the fighting has ceased, nothing approaching a satisfactory -settlement has ever been concluded—this is specially true. -Eight or nine of the wars recorded concern the Balkans. -Or take the Crimean War. Sir Spencer Walpole says:</p> - -<p>“From 1856 to 1878 the Continent of Europe was afflicted -with five great wars—the Franco-Austrian War of 1859; -the Danish of 1864; the Austro-Prussian of 1860; the -Franco-German of 1870 and the Russo-Turkish of 1878: -all of which can be lineally traced to the war of 1854,” -and one at least of those wars, as we know, sowed the -seeds of future war. The war that is concluded by a dictated<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">10</span> -peace, the war that leaves a sense of grievance and -unsatisfied though legitimate claims, the war that inspires -a lasting desire for revenge inevitably leads to future war. -Wars are never aggressive but always defensive on the -part of those who are responsible for waging them. Wars -are never defensive but always aggressive on the part -of those against whom they are waged. The Ministers -and monarchs do the quarrelling, the people believe the -version they are told and obey. The people do the fighting -and make the sacrifice, the Ministers and monarchs do -the treaty-making without consulting them. The people’s -part is one of valiance, endurance, and suffering; the part -of the Ministers and monarchs is one too often marred by -failure and frequently disfigured by intrigue and deception.</p> - -<p>Cast your eye through these forty-two very brief records -of wars. Think of the valour, the determination, and -the heroism of the people, be they soldiers or civilians. -Consider the noble part played by those who without -question obeyed what they were led to believe was their -country’s call. And then look on the other side at the -results—the ineptitude of the statesmen, the patched-up -treaties, the worthless agreements, the wars that led to -further wars, the failure to secure a settlement after the -soldier had done his part, and the unnecessary prolongation -of conflicts when agreement might have been reached -by the exercise of a little wisdom and foresight. The -contrast is remarkable between the actions on the battlefield -and the intrigue in the council chamber. Blood -has been spilt, lives lost, and victories won often without -any positive advantage being gained in the final result.</p> - -<p>The wars are arranged according to date. Some were -long-drawn-out struggles, others sharp conflicts of a few -months. The number of men engaged in any battle and -the casualties if they could be tabulated would no doubt -seem comparatively small to our modern eyes. The total -loss of life in the Crimean War amounted to about 600,000 -men.<a id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">1</a> An estimate of the loss in killed and wounded in -some of the other great battles may be given as follows: -Solferino (1859), 31,500; Chickamauga (1863), 35,100;<span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">11</span> -Gettysburg (1863), 37,000; Königrätz (1866), 26,894; -Vionville (1870), 32,800; Gravelotte (1870), 30,000; Plevna -(1877), 19,000;<a id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">2</a> The Boer War (1899–1902): British -losses, 28,603; Boers killed, 4,000, prisoners 40,000;<a id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">3</a> -Mukden (1905), 131,000.</p> - -<div class="footnote"> -<p><a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="fnanchor">1</a> <cite>The Cambridge Modern History</cite>, vol. xii</p> - -<p><a id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2" class="fnanchor">2</a> An article in <cite>Current History</cite>, by General Duryee, of the -U.S.A. Army.</p> - -<p><a id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3" class="fnanchor">3</a> <cite>Encyclopædia Britannica.</cite></p> -</div> - -<p>Wars to the generation that experiences them are unmixed -evils engendering hatred and evil passions and -bringing in their train loss, suffering, destruction, and -impoverishment, all of which are acutely felt. The succeeding -generation inherit their consequences in the shape -of high taxation and the attempts to mend and reconstruct -the dislocated national life. The horror has gone but -the memory remains. To the succeeding generation they -become episodes read of in the cold pages of history, and -then at last they fade into mere names—a battle with a -vaguely remembered date.</p> - -<p>Each war is terminated by a treaty. The main provisions -of a few additional treaties which were not -concluded after wars are also given. In but few -instances have war treaties been observed, and in several -cases they were not worth the paper they were written -on. Treaties are signed and ratified by statesmen without -the sanction or approval, and sometimes without the -knowledge, of their people. The statesmen enter the -council chamber as individuals bent on securing advantages -at other people’s expense, and ready by bargain -and intrigue to attain their ends. These instruments -therefore are expressions of temporary expediency sometimes -exacted after defeat, sometimes the result of -compromise and generally inconclusive. If treaties are -to become sacred obligations founded on international -justice and respected not merely by changing governments -but by whole nations, the spirit in which they -are drawn up and the method by which they are -concluded must be radically altered. The existence of -secret treaties and engagements has proved to be one -of the gravest dangers to European peace.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">12</span> -There are a large number of conventions which have -been concluded between nations, by which social intercourse -with regard to such matters as post and telegraph -is facilitated, and of late years arbitration treaties between -one Power and another have multiplied very rapidly. This -is the one advance in which the efforts of diplomacy have -borne fruit. The important treaty of Arbitration between -Great Britain and the United States is the only one of these -treaties mentioned in the list. Agreements with regard -to the conduct of war have been made, such as the Geneva -Convention of 1864 and 1906, and the Hague Declarations -of 1899 and 1907, but they have proved to a large extent -futile.</p> - -<p>Treaties are generally concluded for an undefined period, -and lapse owing to deliberate breach or altered circumstances. -But no people, and it may safely be said no -government, was precisely aware which of the innumerable -treaties were still in force, and what actually in given -circumstances its obligations were.</p> - -<p>There may be many instances in which a nation may -look back with pride at the victory of its arms and the -achievements of its generals. There are but few instances -in which a nation can look back with pride at the advantages -gained by treaties of peace and at the achievements -of its diplomatists. From the Treaty of Vienna, 1815, to -the Treaty of Bukarest, 1913, the record of so-called settlements -is not one to inspire confidence in the efficacy of -warfare or in the methods of diplomacy.</p> - -<p>After the termination of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 -there were great hopes of an era of peace. But two antagonistic -elements existed in Europe which were bound -sooner or later to come into open conflict. On the one -hand the French Revolution had engendered in the peoples -a spirit of unrest, of discontent, of impatience with the -unfettered monarchical system, and at the same time confidence -in their power and hope of success in the destruction -of tyranny and arbitrary government. It was in fact the -rise of democracy. On the other side the despotic governments -were ready to co-operate, and, under the guidance -of Metternich, endeavour to repress and exterminate the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">13</span> -movement for the establishment of constitutional government, -and for the expression of nationalist and democratic -aspirations. Two waves of revolution passed over Europe -in 1830 and 1848, and by the middle of the century the -reactionaries could no longer hold their own, and many -states had been freed from despotism and oppression.</p> - -<p>In the latter part of the century, however, as has already -been pointed out, fresh causes for war arose in the competitive -ambition of governments for imperial expansion. -Wars became more frequent and extended into remote -regions of the world which had become accessible. There -are forty-seven wars mentioned in these records; of these -thirteen took place before the Crimean War, which is -about the middle of the period, and thirty-three after. In -twenty-one out of the forty-five wars Great Britain was -either directly or indirectly concerned as a belligerent. -There were only two wars in which Christian nations were -not primarily involved.</p> - -<p>It must be remembered that in no country had the -peoples any voice in the determination of policy so far -as international affairs were concerned. While for brevity’s -sake the usual phraseology is adopted, and such expressions -used as “France decided,” “Russia refused,” “Italy -intended,” etc., etc., in no case does the name of the country -mean the people or indeed anything more than a monarch -and a few statesmen. Although constitutional monarchy -became established during the period in many countries, -and with it, parliamentary government, the idea of diplomacy, -foreign policy, international engagements, and -treaties being under parliamentary supervision and control, -had not yet been suggested.</p> - -<p>The solution of the vast problem of the avoidance of -war in the future, if it rests alone on the wisdom of sovereigns -and statesmen, is not likely, judging by the experience -of the past, to be reached very rapidly. In the -meanwhile a careful examination of the events of recent -history is a necessary preparation for all who want to -dispel the strange but prevalent delusion that force of -arms settles international disputes, and this record may -be useful as a manual for reference.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">14</span></p> - -<div class="main"> -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_GREEK_WAR">THE GREEK WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1821–1828</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Greece and later Russia, France and Great Britain.<br /> -Turkey. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Nationalist aspirations had been growing in Greece -ever since the French Revolution. These were encouraged -by an intellectual revival and commercial -development. The tyranny and cruel oppression of -Turkish misgovernment under Sultan Mahmud gradually -inflamed public opinion.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The Hetæria Philike, a secret society, inaugurated -the rebellion. The first move was made in Moldavia, -where it completely failed. This was followed by a -revolt in the Morea and the islands of the Ægean -and subsequently in Central Greece.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>There were wholesale massacres on both sides, -notably the destruction by the Turks of the inhabitants -of Chios. The Turks were unable to suppress the -revolt. The Greeks under Kolokotrones exhausted -the Turkish army, and assistance was sought by the -Sultan from Mehemet Ali, of Egypt, who in 1823 conquered -Crete and defeated the Greeks at Psara. The -Egyptians and Turks entered Morea. Missolonghi -fell after a year’s siege, and the garrison in the Acropolis -at Athens surrendered in June 1827. By a -treaty signed at London in July 1827 Great Britain, -France, and Russia decided to intervene as mediators. -The Turks rejected mediation. The victory of the -allied fleets at Navarino took place on October 20 1827.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">15</span></p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Adrianople</i>, September 1829 (see -also p. <a href="#Page_17">17</a>) Greece became autonomous under the -supreme sovereignty of the Sultan. Shortly afterwards -the Powers agreed that Greece should be -established as an absolutely independent kingdom, -but without Crete or Samos, and with a frontier -line drawn from the mouth of the River Achelous to -a spot near Thermopylæ. Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg -accepted the crown, but renounced it after -a few months. Prince Otho of Bavaria accepted -it in February 1833. After a revolution in 1862 he -was succeeded by Prince George of Denmark in 1863, -the father of King Constantine who was deposed in -1917.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Greece was confined within far too narrow limits, -with which she could not rest contented. The enmity -between Russia and Turkey was in no way mitigated, -and Russian ambitions remained unsatisfied.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">16</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="RUSSO-TURKISH_WAR">RUSSO-TURKISH WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1828–1829</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Russia.<br /> -Turkey. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>By the Treaty of London, July 1827, Great Britain, -Russia, and France undertook to put an end to the -conflict in the East, which had arisen out of the Greek -struggle for independence. After the victory of -Navarino, Canning died and Great Britain was inactive. -By the <i>Treaty of Akerman</i>, October 1826, -the points of contention between Russia and Turkey -had been settled in Russia’s favour. But the Russian -Government ardently desired a contest with Turkey.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The Sultan Mahmud issued a proclamation which -was a direct challenge to Russia, and followed it by -a levy of troops and the expulsion of Christians from -Constantinople. On April 26, 1828, Russia replied -by declaring war.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Russians occupied the Roumanian principalities -and crossed the Danube. At first the Turks had -considerable successes in the Dobrudja, and the -Russians, who suffered enormous losses, were only -able to capture Varna. Reserves were brought up -during the winter. After fierce resistance the Turks -were routed near Shumla. In July 1829 the Russians -crossed the Balkans, the fleet co-operated in the Black -Sea, and the army began to march on Constantinople. -In Asia, Kars and Erzeroum having fallen into the -Russian hands, the Sultan yielded.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">17</span></p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Adrianople</i>, September 14, 1829, -Russian ascendancy in the principalities of the Danube -was permanently assured, and the whole of the Caucasus -was converted into Russian territory. The Straits -were declared free and open to merchant ships of all -Powers. The Turkish Government gave its adhesion -to the Treaty of London regulating the Greek frontier.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Russia’s hold over Turkey was greatly strengthened, -but the establishment of an absolutely independent -kingdom in Greece was finally secured.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">18</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="WAR_BETWEEN_HOLLAND_AND_BELGIUM">WAR BETWEEN HOLLAND AND BELGIUM<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1830–1839</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Holland.<br /> -Belgium, France, Great Britain. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The Kingdom of the Netherlands was set up by -the Congress of Vienna in 1815, but from the first -there was discord between the two states of the -kingdom. King William was a Dutchman and a -Protestant. Holland, although the smaller of the two -states, had a permanent majority in the Chamber. -Public offices and appointments were filled by -Dutchmen. The hatred of Dutch rule grew, and with -it a desire for separation.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The success of the French Revolution of 1830 led -to an outbreak in Brussels, and Belgian insurgents -fought against the Dutch soldiers. The Powers met -in London, and Belgium was declared a separate -kingdom. Leopold of Saxe-Coburg was offered the -crown and entered Brussels as King of the Belgians -on June 21, 1831; at the same time the Dutch prepared -for an invasion.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>On August 9, 1831, the Belgians were routed in -an encounter with the Dutch, but on the intervention -of the French army King William withdrew. The -Conference in London drew up a treaty, but King -William refused to come to terms and retained possession -of Antwerp. In November a combined British -and French fleet sailed for the coast of Holland, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">19</span> -a French army laid siege to Antwerp. The Dutch -garrison capitulated on December 23, 1831, and the -town was handed over to the Belgians and the French -troops withdrew. Still the Dutch refused to yield -and held two forts which enabled them to command -the navigation of the Scheldt. Not till March 1838 -did Holland signify her readiness to accept the treaty.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>The Conference throughout had endeavoured to -come to an agreement; Austria, Prussia, and Russia -sympathized with Holland; but eventually the final -<i>Treaty of London</i> was signed on April 19, 1839. Luxemburg -was divided, and also the district of Maestricht. -The Scheldt was declared open to the commerce of -both countries. The national debt was divided, and -the five Powers guaranteed the independence and -neutrality of Belgium.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>As independent states the two countries lived side -by side amicably. The neutrality of Belgium was -reaffirmed in 1870 on the outbreak of the Franco-German -War.</p> - -<p>Leopold was succeeded in 1865 by his son Leopold -II, under whose sovereignty the Congo Free State -was placed in 1885. King Albert succeeded his uncle -in 1909.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">20</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="WAR_IN_PORTUGAL_AND_SPAIN">WAR IN PORTUGAL AND SPAIN<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1830–1839</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Followers of Don Miguel.<br /> -Portuguese Constitutionalists.<br /> -Spaniards.<br /> -Carlists.<br /> -and for a period France and Great Britain. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Don Miguel, the head of the reactionary party, was -betrothed to Donna Maria, daughter of Pedro of -Brazil. In 1828, disregarding his professions of loyalty -to the Constitution, he declared himself King of -Portugal. The Constitutionalists, who were adherents -of Donna Maria, were crushed. She received no -assistance from outside to deal with the usurper.</p> - -<p>In Spain Don Carlos, the King’s brother, was the -representative of the reactionary party. King -Ferdinand, before his death, issued the Pragmatic -Sanction, which enabled his daughter to succeed to -the throne. The King was weak and unpopular, and -Don Carlos had a great following in Spain.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>In 1830 Great Britain and France demanded satisfaction -for the attacks on their subjects in Lisbon, -and their squadrons appeared in the Tagus. Great -Britain obtained an indemnity and an apology: the -French admiral carried off the best ships of Don -Miguel’s navy. In 1831 Pedro came over from Brazil -and raised troops for the reconquest of Portugal, -which began in the following year. Don Carlos -was making common cause with Don Miguel when -the King of Spain died in 1833, and his child Isabella -was declared Queen, with Christina, his wife, as Regent. -Rebellion broke out, and Don Carlos was proclaimed -King in several provinces.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">21</span></p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Don Pedro captured Oporto, but was besieged there -for nearly a year. With assistance from outside he -overcame the resistance of the enemy and entered -Lisbon in July, 1833. A quadruple treaty was signed -at London in April 1834, by which Spain and Portugal, -assisted by Great Britain and France, engaged to -drive both Miguel and Carlos from the Peninsula. A -Spanish army marched against Miguel and the British -fleet arrived. Miguel renounced the crown, and -quitted the Peninsula. Don Carlos was conducted -to London, but he escaped and appeared again in -Spain at the head of his insurgents in July 1834. -He gained several victories, and prepared to march -on Madrid. Christina appealed to France for assistance, -but Louis Philippe was reluctant to embark -on the enterprise and refused. The war continued -till at last General Espatero forced back the insurgents, -the Carlists turned their arms against one -another, and Don Carlos surrendered and crossed -the French frontier.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>Absolutism was crushed and a more constitutional -form of government was established. But the throne -of Spain was the subject of further disputes in the -future.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This prolonged and barbaric conflict disgraced the -Spanish nation. The three Eastern Powers favoured -the cause of Don Carlos and reaction. It was the -fear of possibly provoking a general war that made -France refuse to intervene.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">22</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="RUSSIAN_CAMPAIGN_IN_POLAND">RUSSIAN CAMPAIGN IN POLAND<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1831</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Russia.<br /> -Poland. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>By the three partitions of 1772, 1793, and 1795 -Poland ceased to exist as an independent state, and -Polish territory was divided up between Russia, -Prussia, and Austria. But in 1814 the Grand Duchy -of Warsaw was established as a separate kingdom -subject to the Czar of Russia. The economic and -political life was revived and with it antagonism to -Russia. In 1828 plans were made for an outbreak, -but the opportunity was neglected. The French -Revolution of 1830 rekindled the flames.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>A revolt broke out in November 1830. An attempt -was made to negotiate with the Czar Nicholas, who -let it be understood that Poland had but two alternatives, -unconditional submission or annihilation. -The Polish Government, in January 1831, replied by -proclaiming his dethronement. War was unavoidable, -and Russian troops crossed the Polish frontier -in February.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The losses sustained by the Russian armies were -considerable, but the Poles had to fall back on Warsaw -and were defeated at Ostrolenka. Russian reinforcements -came up, and on September 8, 1831, the Russian -army made its entrance into Warsaw, and the revolt -was suppressed.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">23</span></p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>The Constitution of Poland was abolished: it ceased -to be a separate kingdom and became a province of -the Russian Empire. The Polish leaders were exiled.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The Poles might have won a gradual development -of constitutional liberty without a break with the -powerful sovereignty of the Czar; the revolt no doubt -was rash and unwise. But, on the other hand, the -governments of Western Europe, including Great -Britain, who, by the Treaty of Vienna, guaranteed the -autonomy of Poland, never lifted a hand on behalf -of Polish independence, and acquiesced in its complete -absorption by Russia.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">24</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_TURKO-EGYPTIAN_WAR">THE TURKO-EGYPTIAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1832–1841</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Turkey and later Prussia, Austria, Russia, and Great Britain.<br /> -Egypt. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The ambition for extension of power on the part -of Mehemet Ali, Viceroy of Egypt.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>Unsatisfied with the Island of Crete given to him -for his services to the Ottoman Empire, Mehemet Ali -sent his son Ibrahim with a force and laid siege to -Acre. He was declared a rebel, and the Turkish army -entered Syria.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Syria and Asia Minor were conquered by Ibrahim. -Russia offered aid, but on the intervention of France -the Sultan was persuaded to make peace, making over -to Mehemet Ali Syria and the province of Adena. -At the same time, in July 1833, a treaty of defensive -alliance was signed at <i>Unkiar Skelessi</i> between Russia -and Turkey, by which Russia obtained very nearly -complete ascendancy at Constantinople. Great -Britain desired to maintain the Sultan’s power: France -befriended Mehemet Ali: both were agreed in checking -Russian influence in the Levant. War broke out -again. Ibrahim gained a victory at Nissibim in June -1839, and the Turkish fleet surrendered to Mehemet -Ali at Alexandria. A quadruple treaty was signed by -Great Britain, Russia, Austria, and Prussia, by which -it was proposed that Mehemet should have the hereditary -government of Egypt, should withdraw from -Syria and hold Palestine as a governor under the Porte.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">25</span> -The exclusion of France from this agreement roused -great public indignation. By the aid of the Allies -Mehemet Ali was driven from Syria. Acre was captured -by Sir Charles Napier, and Mehemet submitted.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the final settlement, to which France also -agreed, Mehemet Ali abandoned all claim to provinces -outside Egypt, undertook to restore the -Turkish fleet, and was assured the hereditary possession -of Egypt. The Straits were closed to the -warships of all nations. This prevented Russia from -becoming a Mediterranean Power.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Turkey now became dependent on the protection of -Europe. Hopes of internal reform, however, never -fructified. The conflicting ambitions of European -Powers with regard to the continually shrinking -dominions of the Sultan became henceforth an increasing -source of friction.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">26</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="FIRST_AFGHAN_WAR">FIRST AFGHAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1838–1842</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain and Indian Troops.<br /> -Afghanistan. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The close proximity of Afghanistan to India necessitated -the British Government watching jealously -the affairs of that country, and preparing for the -possibility of its being brought under the domination -of any other Power. Russian intrigues had been -throughout a source of suspicion and uneasiness. -The British policy was declared to be the maintenance -of the integrity and independence of -Afghanistan.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The British Government decided to reinstate Shah -Shuja, who was a refugee in British territory, Dost -Mahommed being in power at Kabul.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>A British Indian force advanced in March 1838, -and entered Kandahar. Shah Shuja was crowned. -Dost Mahommed withdrew, and Kabul was entered. -The war was brought to an end, but in November -1841 a revolt broke out in Kabul and there were -serious massacres. The British garrison in withdrawing -was overwhelmed between Kabul and Jalalabad. -Reinforcements, in 1842, forced the Kyber -Pass, relieved Jalalabad and occupied Kabul. The -army finally evacuated Afghanistan in December 1842.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>A ruler imposed on a free people by foreign arms -is always unpopular. The Afghans considered that<span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">27</span> -Shah Shuja’s rule under the protection of British -troops might be fatal to their national independence.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This war has been described as a rash, ill-planned, -and hazardous enterprise, and was the immediate -cause of further trouble. (See p. <a href="#Page_58">58</a>.)</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">28</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_OPIUM_WAR_IN_CHINA">THE OPIUM WAR IN CHINA<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1840–1842</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain.<br /> -China. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The Chinese still held the doctrine that no political -relations or dealings should be held with any foreign -country. The British Government under Palmerston -decided to place trade relations with China on a more -satisfactory basis, confusion and annoyance having -arisen owing to the expiry of the East India Company’s -charter. They also resolved to protect the opium -traffic in spite of the protests of the Chinese Government. -This latter reason overshadowed the others, -and the war, which was known as the Opium War, -was the subject of heated controversy in England.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The Chinese Government refused to recognize the -British Commission or to come to terms on the opium -question. Reports in 1839 from Captain Elliot, the -British Trade Commissioner, led to the decision of -the British Government to send an expedition, and -war was declared in 1840.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The fleet captured Chusan, and in the following -year Amoy. Ningpo fell, and in 1842 Chapu, Woosung, -and Shanghai shared the same fate. Before Nanking -could be captured the Chinese Government proposed -terms of peace.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Nanking</i>, August 21, 1842, Hong-kong -was formally ceded to the British Crown;<span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">29</span> -Canton, Amoy, Fuchow, Ningpo, and Shanghai were -declared open to foreign trade. A war indemnity -of twelve million dollars was paid to Great Britain, -and subsequent treaties were signed for the regulation -of trade.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This was the beginning of the exploitation of China -by the Western Powers. It led to further wars, and -the opium question continued to agitate public opinion -in Great Britain and cause disputes with China for -the rest of the century, until the opium trade was -finally abolished in 1913.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">30</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="AMERICAN_WAR_WITH_MEXICO">AMERICAN WAR WITH MEXICO<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1846–1848</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -The United States of America.<br /> -Mexico. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Texas seceded from Mexico in 1836. The independence -of Texas was recognized by the United States, -but the proposal that the new state should be admitted -into the Union was declined. A strong support -for the annexation of Texas in the interests of slavery -grew up, more especially in the Southern states, and -in December 1844 resolutions were passed in both -Houses, and it was formally enrolled as a new state.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The Mexican Government still claimed Texas as -a province, and its annexation by the United States -was considered an act of hostility. The Americans -had suffered long under continued acts of insult -and spoliation on the part of the Mexicans, and were -therefore prepared to fight.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Americans under Taylor invaded Mexico, won -battles at Palo Alto and Resaca and captured -Monterey. In 1847 there were more victories, the -Mexicans under Santa Anna being everywhere defeated. -The Americans entered Mexico City on -September 14th. After further fighting peace was -proclaimed at Washington in July 1848.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo</i>, February 2, -1848, Mexico ceded the whole of Texas, New Mexico, -and Upper California. The United States surrendered -their other conquests.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">31</span></p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>So far as Texas was concerned, the political opinion -in the United States was divided, and that division -was to become more serious as time went on. On -the other hand, Mexico was a troublesome neighbour, -and has continued ever since to be the cause of disturbance -and dispute.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">32</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="AUSTRO-HUNGARIAN_WAR">AUSTRO-HUNGARIAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1848–1849</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Hungary.<br /> -Austria, the Southern Slavs and Russia. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The fall of Metternich, who had been the champion -of despotism and reaction throughout Europe, and -the revolutionary spirit which ran through Europe -in 1848, created great unrest in the Austro-Hungarian -Empire. The Emperor Ferdinand was weak and -worthless, and the Magyars were determined not to -submit to the domination of autocratic rule in Austria. -Jellacic, the Croatian leader, hoped to create a Southern -Slav state: he co-operated with the Austrians in -opposition to Hungary, and was supported by the -Czechs of Bohemia.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>Finding it impossible to come to terms with the -Emperor Ferdinand, Kossuth, the Hungarian leader, -took up an uncompromisingly hostile attitude. Jellacic -marched to Pesth. A revolutionary movement of -sympathy with Hungary broke out in Vienna. The -Emperor fled to Olmutz. Windischgrätz, the Austrian -general, marched on Vienna and took possession in -November 1848. Ferdinand abdicated, and Francis -Joseph, his nephew, became Emperor December 2nd. -The Hungarians refused to acknowledge him. There -was a rising of Roumanians in Transylvania, and the -whole Hungarian nation was called to arms.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Austrians occupied Pesth on January 5, 1849; -the Hungarians withdrew to Debreczin and were defeated -at Kapolona on February 26th. In April the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">33</span> -Magyar troops recovered and the Austrians were -driven out of Hungary. On April 19th Hungary -was proclaimed an independent state. Russia intervened -to assist Austria, and marched an army across -Galicia. The Hungarians were now confronted with -a force three times the size of their own, and the main -army capitulated at Vilagos on August 13, 1849.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>Hungary was completely crushed and subjected to -savage punishment by its conquerors. Every vestige -of its old constitutional rights was extinguished.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>In 1860 the old Constitution was restored. In -1867 the Emperor Francis Joseph was crowned King -of Hungary. A responsible ministry was appointed, -and a financial agreement (Ausgleich) made between -Austria and Hungary.</p> - -<p>Nationality asserted itself in spite of all attempts -at repression. But the Hungarians, in their turn, -held the Slav and Roumanian populations within their -borders with an iron grasp and failed to gain their -affection.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">34</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_ITALIAN_WAR_OF_LIBERATION">THE ITALIAN WAR OF LIBERATION<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1831, 1848–1849, 1859 and 1866–1867</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -The States of Italy.<br /> -Austria.<br /> -France. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Italy, after the fall of Napoleon, was divided into -separate ill-governed small states, with Venice and -Lombardy in the hands of Austria. The idea of -uniting Italy under one Government grew as the century -advanced, and received fresh impetus from the -revolutionary movements in Europe in 1830 and 1848. -The society, “Young Italy,” under the guidance of -Mazzini, kept the spirit of revolution alive, although -several insurrections instigated by them failed. The -expulsion of Austria became the central idea of the -movement.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The quarrels between the smaller states: the hatred -of the presence of Austria, who, under Metternich’s -guidance, desired throughout to suppress the movement: -the decline of Austrian power on the rise of -Prussia: the intervention of France to prevent Austrian -aggrandizement and to protect the Pope.</p> - -<h3>Course of the Wars:</h3> - -<p>The revolt in the Papal States in 1831 was suppressed -by Austrian intervention. France also intervened, -and the Austrian troops withdrew. In 1848 Sardinian -troops advanced against Austria, but after much -fighting round Verona were defeated at Santa Lucia.</p> - -<p>Civil war broke out between Naples and Sicily. -Sardinia and Piedmont, under Victor Emmanuel and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">35</span> -his Minister, Cavour, now took the lead. France -became their ally in 1859. In spite of attempts at -mediation by Great Britain, Austria presented an -ultimatum, April 23, 1859. Napoleon III and the -Allies won victories at Magenta and Solferino. By -the <i>Peace of Villa Franca</i> in July, followed by the -<i>Treaty of Zurich</i>, November 10, 1859, Austria ceded -Lombardy but not Venice. Tuscany, Parma Modena, -and Romagna were united to Piedmont by their own -vote. Savoy and Nice were ceded to France.</p> - -<p>In 1860 Garibaldi conquered Sicily and Naples. -Piedmontese troops entered the Papal States. By -1861 all Italy, with the exception of Rome and Venice, -was under Victor Emmanuel. In the North war broke -out again. The Italians were defeated by Austria at -Custozza, but after Königgrätz (see p. <a href="#Page_50">50</a>) the Austrians -ceded Venice to France, and Napoleon III handed it -over to Italy. This arrangement was confirmed by the -<i>Treaty of Vienna</i>, October 3, 1866, between Austria -and Italy. In 1867 France defended the Papal States -against Garibaldi’s invasion, and he was defeated at -Mentana. Finally, in 1870, Napoleon III withdrew -his troops from Papal territory, and on September 20th -Victor Emmanuel entered Rome.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>All Italy became united under one monarch with -its capital at Rome. Victor Emmanuel was succeeded -in 1878 by Humbert, the father of King Victor Emmanuel -III.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The rivalry between Austria and Italy did not die -down, and there were still certain territories—<i>Italia -irredenta</i> (such as Trentino)—which remained in -Austrian hands.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">36</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_CRIMEAN_WAR">THE CRIMEAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1854–1856</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain, France, Turkey and Sardinia.<br /> -Russia. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>From 1830 onwards there was a growing estrangement -between Great Britain and Russia. The Czar -Nicholas believed that the dominion of the Turk in -Europe was nearing its end, and cherished the ambition -that Russia should acquire provinces of the -Ottoman dominions. On the other hand, there was -keen opposition in Great Britain to Russia’s expansion, -and to the idea of Constantinople falling into her -hands. Louis Napoleon had only two years previously -become Emperor of the French. His dynastic -ambitions made him eager for military glory. Sardinia -joined the Allies for tactical reasons.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The French claimed the custody of the Holy Places -in Palestine: the Russians made a counter-claim to -the custody of the Holy Places and to a Protectorate -over the Greek Christians in the Ottoman Empire. -The Turkish Government, on the advice of the British -Ambassador, Lord Stratford de Redcliffe, refused to -accept the Russian claims. Russian troops crossed -the Pruth in June 1853, and a Turkish squadron was -destroyed at Sinope in November. On the refusal -of Russia to make her ships re-enter port in the Black -Sea and evacuate the Danubian principalities, war -was declared by France and England on March 27, 1854.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Crimea was invaded, and fighting continued -there for two years. The Austrian attempt at mediation<span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">37</span> -in May 1855, failed. The Russians were defeated -at Alma and Inkerman, and Sevastopol, after a long -siege, fell on September 9, 1855. The Russians captured -Kars in November.</p> - -<h3>Political Results:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Paris</i>, March 30, 1856, the Black -Sea was neutralized. An engagement was made by -all the Powers to respect the independence and integrity -of the Ottoman Empire: the Sultan promised -to give equality of treatment to his Christian subjects. -The Danubian provinces were granted independence -under the sovereignty of the Sultan.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This treaty was absolutely barren. The Sultan’s -promise was never acted on: the neutrality of the -Black Sea was maintained only till 1870: and when -the integrity of the Ottoman Empire was assailed in -later years none of the signatory Powers intervened -in its defence. But at the Congress of Berlin in 1878 -the Powers partitioned parts of the Ottoman Empire. -So far from settling any disputes this war caused -dissensions which led to other wars.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">38</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_INDIAN_MUTINY">THE INDIAN MUTINY<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1857–1858</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain.<br /> -Native Indians. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The East India Company had engaged in constant -wars and employed an army in which native troops -outnumbered the British by eight to one. The Sepoys -especially became aware of their strength and importance. -In many ways religious sensibilities were -offended, dissatisfaction with the Company’s rule -spread and unrest was abroad.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The spirit of revolt grew, and a trivial incident was -sufficient to make the spark burst into a flame. Cartridges -used for the new Enfield rifle smeared with the -fat of sacred cows and the lard of polluted pigs were -to be bitten by Hindu and Mohammedan alike. -The ferment caused by the rumour spread and the -mutiny broke out.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Native troops mutinied at Mirat, and proceeded to -Delhi, Cawnpore, and Lucknow. Many British men -and women were murdered. A British force in June -and July 1857 marched on Delhi. Engagements -were fought, in which there were heavy losses. Disease -and cholera also carried off many victims. After a -great struggle Lahore was captured in September, -and Agra was relieved, also Cawnpore, where, under -Nana Sahib, the most hideous massacres and cruelty -had taken place. At Lucknow a heroic resistance -was made against an overwhelming force of rebels.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">39</span> -It was relieved on November 22, 1857. In March -1858, the whole province of Oudh was recovered by -Outram and Colin Campbell. Not till the beginning -of 1859 did organized resistance come to an end in all -parts of India.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the Queen’s proclamation of November 1858 the -government of India was taken over by the British -Government. The Queen declared that all her Indian -subjects should be protected in the exercise of their -religious observances. Excessive measures of repression -which had been resorted to were stopped.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Queen Victoria was styled Empress of India at the -instance of Disraeli in 1876. Various reforms have -been instituted in Indian administration tentatively -allowing Indians some share in the government of the -country. But the problem of British rule in India -is not one which is capable of final solution.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_40">40</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_CHINESE_WAR">THE CHINESE WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1857–1860</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain, France.<br /> -China. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The increasing commercial ambitions of Western -Powers in the East led Great Britain and France to -insist on the establishment of fair and equitable terms -of trade. The Chinese Government was in the hands -of the Tatars known as the Taipings, who, by -their successful rebellion, had overthrown the Manchu -dynasty.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The refusal of the Chinese Government to redress -long-standing grievances or to allow the diplomatic -representatives of the Western Powers to reside in -Peking; the seizure of the crew of the British ship -<i>Arrow</i> off Canton, and the refusal of the Chinese -Governor to apologize or surrender the men, and the -murder of a French missionary in Kwangsi brought -things to a head.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Canton was taken by the British in December 1857. -The Taku Forts fell in May 1858 and Tientsin was -occupied. Negotiations were attempted but failed. -An allied force of British and French landed in 1860, -marched on Peking, and the Chinese yielded.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the treaty of October 24, 1860, the Chinese paid -an indemnity of eight million taels. The right of -Europeans to travel in the interior was granted, and -freedom guaranteed to the preaching of Christianity.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_41">41</span> -By the customs tariff agreed upon the import of opium -was legalized. In the course of 1861 British, French, -and Russian legations were permanently established -at Peking, and in the following years the same right -was conceded to other European nations. By treaties -with Russia in the same year China ceded all its territory -north of the Amur to Russia, and in this territory -Vladivostock was founded.</p> - -<p>Good relations having been established, the Chinese -Government, with the assistance of Gordon, carried -out a successful campaign against the Taipings, and -the Manchu dynasty was restored.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This was the opening of the door into China, and -from henceforth the Western Powers began to compete -for commercial and territorial prizes in the Chinese -Empire.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">42</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="AMERICAN_CIVIL_WAR">AMERICAN CIVIL WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1861–1865</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -The Northern states of North America.<br /> -The Southern states of North America. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The cultivation of cotton progressed under very -different conditions in the North and South. In the -North the white man had to work vigorously to overcome -the disadvantages of the soil. In the South the -negro labourer could be used with profit to his owner, -and was held as a slave. By 1860 the thirteen original -states were enlarged to thirty-three. The territories -of the North-east found their prosperity in free labour, -the South throve on the cotton crop and continued -to exploit negro labour. The Southern states gradually -combined together, and between 1830 and 1850 -gained a predominant voice in the control of Federal -affairs. The North also became consolidated, and a -strong movement against slavery grew up, chiefly -owing to the efforts of W. Lloyd Garrison. A new -Republican party gained strength in its opposition -to the dominating differences of the South, and sectional -political differences were intensified. The -prospect of the abolition of slavery was not the only -issue. The South resented the idea that coercive -measures might be used to keep the lower South in -the Union. They believed this to be an attack on -the doctrine of the sovereignty of states. A widespread -feeling in favour of secession grew up.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The Republican party triumphed at the election, -and Abraham Lincoln became President in November, -1860. South Carolina seceded, ten other states followed, -and the Confederate States were established<span class="pagenum" id="Page_43">43</span> -under the Presidency of Jefferson Davis. The attack -on Fort Sumter by the Confederates on April 4, 1861, -made war inevitable.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The North was defeated at Bull Run in July 1861, -but captured forts Henry and Donelson in 1862, and -gained a victory at Shiloh. At Richmond, and later -at Fredericksburg, the North was defeated. Lincoln -issued his proclamation of Emancipation on January 1, -1863. The South, under Lee, were defeated in the -greatest battle of the war at Gettysburg, on July 4th. -In 1864 there were further victories for the North -under Grant at Spottsylvania and Coldharbour; and -Atlanta and Savanah were captured. In 1865 Petersburg -and Richmond were evacuated by the Confederates -and Lee surrendered. On May 26th the war came to -an end, after a desperate struggle of nearly four years.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>The Union was restored and slavery abolished. -Lincoln was assassinated on April 14, 1865, and his -wise counsel was lost therefore for the difficult work -of reconstruction which followed the war.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Great Britain declared neutrality at the outset, -and thereby implicitly, though not explicitly, recognized -the Southern Confederacy as a belligerent Power. -There was much sympathy with the South among the -governing class, but the people were on the side of -the North. The Trent affair brought Great Britain -and America very near to war. (See <a href="#twash"><i>Treaty of Washington</i></a>, -p. 94.)</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_44">44</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="FRENCH_EXPEDITION_IN_MEXICO">FRENCH EXPEDITION IN MEXICO<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1862–1867</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -France.<br /> -Mexican Republicans. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>From 1789, the date of the first conspiracy against -Spain, down to 1857, when a Constitution was promulgated, -Mexico was in a state of permanent warfare. -In 1861 France, Spain, and Great Britain adopted -joint measures against the republic in order to get -better protection for their subjects and their property. -In 1862 Great Britain and Spain withdrew. But -Napoleon III conceived the project of establishing a -monarchy in Mexico under his patronage, and so -increasing French ascendancy beyond the Atlantic.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The financial misdemeanours of the Mexican Government -were made the pretext for the advance of French -troops into Mexico in 1862.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The French force was checked in May 1862, and -further reinforcements were sent out. They advanced -again in February 1863, and entered Mexico City in -June. A Provisional Government was established, -and the crown was offered to Maximilian of Austria, -who accepted it and reached Mexico City in June -1864. Juarez, the republican leader, was driven into -the extreme north of the country. But his resistance -was by no means overcome. Napoleon III bound -himself to keep a force in Mexico for the protection -of Maximilian. In 1865, on the restoration of peace -after the Civil War in the United States, the Government<span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">45</span> -of Washington refused to acknowledge any -authority in Mexico but that of Juarez. The French -were obliged to withdraw in 1867, and Maximilian -was left to his fate. The Juarists got the upper hand, -and Maximilian was executed.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>Juarez, as President of Mexico, was succeeded by -Diaz in 1877; and order was maintained for a generation.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This foolish enterprise damaged the reputation of -Napoleon III. He was regarded as a political adventurer, -and became increasingly unpopular in his own -country.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">46</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="BRAZILIAN_WAR">BRAZILIAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1864–1870</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Brazil, Uruguay, Argentine Republic.<br /> -Paraguay. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Brazil was part of the Portuguese possessions until -1822, when it declared its independence. The Emperors -Pedro I and II had frequent trouble not only -with the republican movement in Brazil itself, but -with the neighbouring states, with whom they were -constantly at war. In 1855 Pedro II sent a squadron -up the Parana to adjust several questions outstanding -with the republic of Paraguay. Although certain -rights were granted to Brazil the Government of -Paraguay threw every obstacle in the way to prevent -a settlement.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>In 1864 Lopez, the ambitious dictator of Paraguay, -without declaring war, captured a Brazilian vessel, -and invaded Brazil and the Argentine. Uruguay -joined them in a triple alliance of defence against -Paraguay.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Owing to the strong natural position of Paraguay, -and the obstinacy of Lopez, the war was drawn out -with constant fighting and great sacrifice of life in -addition to vast expenditure, until 1870, when it was -terminated by the capture and death of Lopez.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>External troubles ceased, but the republican movement -gained in strength until 1889, when Pedro was -deposed and a republic declared in Brazil.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_47">47</span></p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The slaughter in this war was so terrific that the -population of Paraguay was reduced from 1,337,439 -to 221,079.</p> - -<p>This is only one example of the very frequent disturbances, -both internal and external, in the South -American continent during the course of the century.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">48</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_DANISH_WAR">THE DANISH WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1864</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Denmark.<br /> -Prussia and Austria. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The strong revival of nationalism in Germany after -the Napoleonic Wars spread to the German inhabitants -of the Duchies of Schleswig Holstein, who desired in -1848 to be incorporated as a single constitutional -state in the German Federation. The Danish crown -could be inherited by female heirs, but in the Duchies -the Salic law had never been repealed. This made -complications with regard to the succession. Frederick -VII of Denmark endeavoured to preserve the -Duchy as an integral part of Denmark. An insurrection -broke out, and Prussia intervened by marching -troops into Holstein. Under pressure from other -Powers the King of Prussia signed a convention at -Malmoe practically yielding all the Danish demands, -and in 1850, by the <i>Treaty of Berlin</i>, peace was restored -between Prussia and Denmark, but without any settlement -of the vexed question. In 1852 Great Britain -intervened with a proposal without success. In 1854 -the King of Denmark promulgated special Constitutions -for the Duchies as well as a common Constitution -for the whole Monarchy. The German Confederation -rejected this as the Diets of the Duchies -had not been consulted. The question became of -European interest: its complexity prevented any -settlement being reached. Bismarck alone was quite -determined on eventual annexation, and Denmark -was equally determined not to yield.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>After further diplomatic disputes Austrian and -Prussian troops entered Schleswig in February 1864.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_49">49</span></p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The allied troops broke through the frontier fortifications -and occupied the greater part of the Danish -mainland. The Danes were overthrown in the island -of Alsen, and the German flag carried to the northern -extremity of Denmark. A conference was opened -in London, April 1864, but the negotiations broke -down and the war continued.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>Eventually, by the <i>Treaty of Vienna</i>, October 30, -1864, the King of Denmark ceded the rights in the -whole of Schleswig Holstein to the Sovereigns of -Austria and Prussia jointly.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This was more a diplomatic war than a military war. -The conflict was between retention and annexation, -and little regard was paid on any side to the desires -of the inhabitants of the disputed territory. Although -by the <i>Treaty of London</i> of 1852 the Powers, including -Great Britain, had acknowledged as permanent the -principle of the integrity of the Danish Monarchy no -steps were taken by them to maintain that principle. -The settlement did nothing to prevent the outbreak -of war between Prussia and Austria two years later, -when Schleswig Holstein was again one of the bones -of contention.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_50">50</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_AUSTRO-PRUSSIAN_WAR">THE AUSTRO-PRUSSIAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1866</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Prussia and some of the smaller North German States and Italy.<br /> -Austria and the other German States. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>From 1848 onwards in all the projects for a united -Germany there was keen rivalry between Prussia and -Austria. Each resisted the domination of the other in -any new Empire, and the South German states were -inclined to side with Austria against Prussian supremacy. -This state of affairs prevented any final scheme -from being agreed to. At the same time there were -serious differences between Austria and Italy, who -was Prussia’s ally. Bismarck made up his mind that -Austria must be expelled by force of arms from the -German Federation. He was an ardent supporter of -the House of Hohenzollern.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>Austria supported Schleswig Holstein in their struggle -for independence against Prussia after the conclusion -of the Danish War. An attempted congress of neutrals -failed. Austria called on the Diet of Frankfort to -take the affairs of Schleswig Holstein into its own -hands, and demanded and obtained the mobilization -of the whole Federal armies. Prussia declared that -this action made an end of the Federal Union, and -submitted a new plan for the organization of Germany, -which was refused. Diplomatic relations were broken -off June 12, 1866.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Hanover and Hesse Cassel were conquered by Prussia, -the Austrians were defeated at Königgrätz, July 3,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_51">51</span> -1866, and the Prussians pushed forward in sight of -Vienna. The Austrians defeated the Italians on land -at Custozza, and by sea at Lissa.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>Napoleon III offered mediation, which was accepted. -The <i>Treaty of Prague</i>, August 23, 1866. Prussia -annexed Hanover, Nassau, Hesse Cassel, and Frankfort: -Germany north of the Main together with -Saxony was included in a Federation under Prussia: -the Southern states were left independent. Prussian -sovereignty over Schleswig Holstein was recognized. -Austria withdrew completely from German affairs.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Napoleon III had attempted, by dividing Germany -in two, to put an obstacle in the way of German -unity. His clumsy diplomacy was greatly disapproved -of in France. By preventing a final -settlement he made the recurrence of war inevitable.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_52">52</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="BRITISH_EXPEDITION_IN_ABYSSINIA">BRITISH EXPEDITION IN ABYSSINIA<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1867–1868</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain.<br /> -Abyssinia. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>From 1855 Abyssinia came under the powerful rule -of the Emperor Theodore. He subdued the neighbouring -kingdoms of Tigré and Shoa, and took Menelek, -son of the ruler of Tigré, to be trained in his service. -He ravaged the surrounding country, and oppressed -his own people. In 1864 there was an interchange -of letters between Theodore and the British Government, -out of which difficulties arose.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The British Consul and his staff, and subsequently -a British emissary, were imprisoned in Magdala and -put in chains. Their release was demanded, but the -Emperor paid no attention, and the British Government -decided they must have recourse to arms.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>A British force under Sir Robert Napier landed in -January 1868, a march of three hundred miles was -undertaken through the mountainous districts, and, -after a fierce engagement, Magdala was stormed and -taken on April 13, 1868. The Emperor committed -suicide, and his son was taken to England, where -he died. The British troops left the country in -May 1868.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>The ruler of Tigré succeeded Theodore under the -title of King John, and on his death, in 1889, Menelek -became Emperor.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">53</span></p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>After this the Italians came on to the scene with -ambitions in this part of Africa (see p. <a href="#Page_74">74</a>), but Abyssinia -remained an independent kingdom. In the -various expeditions against the Mullah in Somaliland -(1902–4) the Abyssinians co-operated with Great -Britain.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">54</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_FRANCO-GERMAN_WAR">THE FRANCO-GERMAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1870–1871</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -France.<br /> -Prussia and ten other German States. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>For some years previously there had been increasing -friction between France and Prussia, owing chiefly to -Louis Napoleon’s apprehensions as to the possibility -of closer union between Prussia and the South German -states, his repeated endeavours to extend the Eastern -frontier of France, and Bismarck’s counter-moves to -frustrate his designs. The desire also for a united -Germany was growing stronger, and Bismarck believed -it could not be completed without a conflict -with France.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The candidature of Prince Leopold of Hohenzollern -Sigmaringen for the throne of Spain in 1870 was resented -by France as calculated to bring Spain under -the influence of Prussia. King William of Prussia, -on representations from France, persuaded Prince -Leopold to withdraw, but refused firmly but politely -a guarantee against the renewal of the candidature. -Bismarck published a telegram conveying the impression -that the French Ambassador, Benedetti, had -been insulted by the King at Ems on the occasion -of the refusal. This infuriated public opinion in -France, the Empress Eugénie actively used her influence, -and Napoleon agreed to a declaration of war -on July 14, 1870.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>In the war, which lasted from July 1870 to -February 1871, the ill-organized and badly led French<span class="pagenum" id="Page_55">55</span> -troops could make no stand against the well-prepared -armies of Germany. The French were defeated at -Wörth, August 6th; Metz, August 7th; Marsla Tour, -August 17th; Gravelotte, August 18th. Paris was -besieged: Louis Napoleon capitulated at Sedan, September -2nd; Strasburg fell, September 28th; Bazaine -capitulated at Metz, October 27th; and the Germans -entered Paris on January 28, 1871.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Frankfort</i>, May 10, 1871, Alsace -and half Lorraine (with Metz) were ceded to Germany, -and an indemnity of 200 millions was exacted from -France. The King of Prussia was proclaimed at -Versailles German Emperor. France was declared -a republic, and Napoleon eventually retired into -exile in England.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The dictation of terms and the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine -entirely prevented friendly relations from -being established between the two countries in the -succeeding years. France, by getting rid of the corrupt -and incompetent government of Napoleon III, began -to recuperate from this time onward. Germany, -having reached the ideal of unity, proceeded gradually -to join in the competition for commercial expansion -and Imperial aggrandizement.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_56">56</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_ASHANTI_WAR">THE ASHANTI WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1873–1874</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain.<br /> -The Ashantis. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The Ashantis, a very fierce and warlike tribe on the -Gold Coast of Africa had repeatedly caused trouble -owing to their treatment of the Fantis, a tribe on the -coast under British protection. In 1824 they defeated -a British force and carried off to Kumasi the skull -of the Governor, Sir Charles M’Carthy, which was -used as a royal drinking cup. They were afterwards -defeated in 1826. In 1863 an expedition against them -had to be abandoned owing to the ravages done by -sickness among the troops. In 1867 a warlike king, -Kofi Karikari succeeded as ruler and proceeded to -make hostile preparations against the Fantis.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>In 1872 some Dutch possessions on the Gold Coast -were transferred to Great Britain. The King of -Ashanti claimed a tribute formerly allowed to him -by the Dutch and refused to evacuate the territory -ceded to Britain. He also held four Europeans in -captivity. The British Government determined to -take up the matter seriously, and when in January -1873 an Ashanti force invaded the British Protectorate -an expedition under Sir Garnet Wolseley was immediately -despatched.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Owing to difficulties of climate it was necessary -that the whole campaign should be rapidly carried -out. The Ashantis were defeated at all points. Kumasi -was reached and King Kofi surrendered. The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_57">57</span> -European troops suffered severely from fever but the -objects were successfully accomplished. Wolseley sailed -from England on September 12, 1873, and returned -to Portsmouth on March 21, 1874.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>The King renounced his claim to supremacy over -any part of the former Dutch protectorate, paid an -indemnity in gold, and agreed to prohibit human -sacrifices. Further trouble arose, however, after the -death of the King, his successors disregarding the -treaty. In 1895 an expedition was sent out under -Colonel Sir F. Scott. Kumasi was occupied and -King Prempeh deported. Still the Ashanti tribes -refused to submit, and continued in rebellion. The -Governor of the Gold Coast and a small force were -surrounded in Kumasi. He managed to escape and -Kumasi was finally relieved by an expedition under -Colonel Wilcocks who gradually suppressed the rebellion. -By an Order in Council of September 26, 1901, -Ashanti was formally annexed to the British dominions -and given a separate administration under the control -of the Governor of the Gold Coast.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Imperial responsibilities entail the protection of -friendly tribes against hostile attack in the outlying -parts of the Empire. Punitive expeditions become -necessary and annexation is found to be the best -method of securing law and order.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_58">58</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="RUSSO-TURKISH_WAR2">RUSSO-TURKISH WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1877–1878</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Russia.<br /> -Turkey. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The persecution and oppression of Christians in -the Ottoman Empire led to a revolt in Herzegovina -in 1875. Andrassy, on behalf of Austria, presented -a Note to the Turkish Government demanding reforms, -and this was followed by the Berlin Memorandum, -signed by Germany, France, Austria, Russia, and Italy. -Great Britain alone stood out. The Bulgarian massacres -in June 1876 caused a great sensation in England, -and were followed by a declaration of war by Servia -and Montenegro against Turkey. Great Britain, -always mistrusting Russian designs, called a Conference. -The demands of the Conference were rejected -by Turkey in January 1877. The Sultan protested -against the encroachment of the Powers on his inviolable -rights.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The London Protocol of March 1877, signed by -Great Britain and Russia and agreed to by the other -Powers, called for reforms and expressed the intention -of the Powers to safeguard the Christian population. -This was also rejected by the Turks, and Russia declared -war on April 24, 1877.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Russian army crossed the Danube. Plevna -fell in December 1877. The Russians entered Adrianople, -January 1878. The advance of the Russian -army towards Gallipoli was followed by the dispatch -of the British fleet to Constantinople and brought<span class="pagenum" id="Page_59">59</span> -Russia and Great Britain within a hair’s-breadth of -war. This, however, was avoided and peace negotiations -began.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p><i>Treaty of San Stefano</i>, March 3, 1878. The independence -of Servia, Montenegro, and Roumania was -recognized. Bulgaria was made an autonomous principality -with frontiers including the greater part of -European Turkey; the Dobrudja and certain districts -in Asia Minor were ceded to Russia.</p> - -<p>Great Britain objected strongly to this treaty, and -proposed a Congress at Berlin. While the chances of -the Congress hung in the balance, Great Britain made -warlike preparations, but the Congress was finally -agreed to.</p> - -<p><i>Treaty of Berlin</i>, July 13, 1878. Bulgaria’s frontier -was confined to the country north of the Balkans. -Bosnia and Herzegovina were handed over to Austria: -the territory given to Serbia and Montenegro was -further restricted: Thessaly and part of Epirus were -ceded to Greece.</p> - -<p>By a secret convention Great Britain engaged to -protect Turkey against further aggression of Russia -in Asia. In return the Porte assigned Cyprus to be -occupied and administered by England.</p> - -<p>Lord Beaconsfield was the British Plenipotentiary -at the Peace Congress and returned declaring he had -secured “peace with honour.”</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This was a patched-up peace. It settled none -of the problems in the Balkans, which continued to -be the danger zone in Europe for the rest of the -century.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_60">60</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_SECOND_AFGHAN_WAR">THE SECOND AFGHAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1878–1881</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain and Indian Troops.<br /> -Afghanistan. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>In 1868 the expanding power of Russia in Asia -resulted in Bokhara becoming a Russian dependency. -In 1873 Russia conquered Khiva. Shere Ali, now -ruler of Afghanistan, became alarmed, but failing to -come to an understanding with the British Government, -he began to make overtures to Russia. In -1877 an offer of alliance was made by the Viceroy of -India, but Shere Ali refused to admit a British Agent -into Afghanistan.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>In 1878 the Russian Government sent an envoy to -Kabul to make a treaty with the Amir. A British -army was also sent, but was turned back on the frontier, -and hostilities were proclaimed by the Viceroy.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Two British forces marched into the interior of -Afghanistan, and occupied important positions. -Shere Ali fled from his capital, and died in February -1879. By the <i>Treaty of Gandamuk</i>, May 1879, -Yakub Khan was recognized as Amir, and he agreed -that a British envoy should reside at his Court. In -September 1879, the envoy, his staff, and his escort -were massacred. A fresh expedition was sent under -Sir F. Roberts, who entered Kabul. In 1880, Abdur -Rahman, nephew of Shere Ali, returned from exile -in Russia and established himself in the northern -provinces. The British Government came to an -agreement with him, and he was recognized as Amir.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_61">61</span> -In July 1880 Ayub Khan, another son of Shere Ali, -defeated a British force at Maiwand. Roberts reached -Kandahar from Kabul by a rapid march, and defeated -Ayub Khan on September 1, 1880. Again, in July -1881, Ayub Khan returned and took possession of -Kandahar, but was finally routed by Abdur Rahman -in September.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>The frontiers of Afghanistan were delimited in -agreement with Russia. Abdur Rahman’s rulership -over Afghanistan was established. He extended and -consolidated his dominion over the whole country, -and was peacefully succeeded by his son Habibullah -in 1901.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>By the Anglo-Russia Convention of 1907, Great -Britain engaged not to alter the political status of -Afghanistan, and Russia recognized it as outside her -sphere of influence.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_62">62</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_ZULU_WAR">THE ZULU WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1879</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain.<br /> -The Zulus. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The warlike and threatening attitude of the Zulus -under Cetywayo constituted a perpetual menace to -the safety of the British possessions in South Africa. -The policy of Sir Bartle Frere, Governor of the Cape -and High Commissioner, was the eventual Federation -of all South African states under British rule, and it -was essential, therefore, in his opinion, that the white -inhabitants should be secured against native raids. -There was a strong opinion that this could be effected -without force of arms.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The cruelties and excesses practised by Cetywayo -culminated in a raid into Natal, where women were -carried off and murdered. Frere issued an ultimatum -demanding the break-up of the military system of -Zululand, and further that a British Resident was to -be received and missionaries were not to be molested. -No reply was received, and British troops entered -Zululand on January 10, 1879.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Frere’s application for reinforcements was refused -by the British Government. But after a British -defeat at Isandhlwana, January 22, 1879, which was -only prevented from being a disaster by the gallant -defence of Rorke’s Drift, Sir Garnet Wolseley was -sent out with more troops. The Zulus were defeated -at Ulundi, July 5th, and Cetywayo was taken prisoner.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_63">63</span></p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>Zululand was divided into thirteen districts, each -with a separate chief, and was placed under a British -Resident. It was finally annexed in 1887.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This war is only an episode in the extension and -consolidation of the British Empire in South Africa. -But it is an instance of the grave responsibilities which -are involved in Imperial expansion.</p> - -<p>In the course of the war the Prince Imperial, only -son of Napoleon III, was killed, and with him died -the last hopes of a restoration of the Napoleonic -dynasty in France.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_64">64</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_CHILE-PERUVIAN_WAR">THE CHILE-PERUVIAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1879–1882</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Chile.<br /> -Peru. Bolivia. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>After the blockade and bombardment of their ports -by a Spanish squadron in 1865, on account of their -sympathy with Peru in a quarrel with Spain, the -Chileans were impressed with the necessity of possessing -an adequate fleet to defend their long coast line. -Ships were obtained and officers trained, so that Chile -became well equipped for any future encounter.</p> - -<p>The authorities of Bolivia seized the effects of the -Chilean Nitrate Company at Antofogasta.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>Five hundred soldiers were despatched to protect -Chilean interests. The force landed and marched -inland. Bolivia declared war on March 1st, Peru on -April 5, 1879.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Chileans occupied every port on the Bolivian -coast, and engaged the Peruvian fleet. The <i>Huascar</i>, -a Peruvian ironclad, after other ships had been -destroyed, did great damage under four successive -commanders, but after severe fighting was forced to -surrender off Angamos, and the Peruvian navy ceased -to exist. After several engagements on land the Chileans -succeeded in taking possession of the Bolivian seaboard -and the Peruvian province of Tarapaca.</p> - -<p>Fighting continued in 1880 when, in spite of daring -resistance, the Peruvians were defeated at all points. -Lima was occupied on January 17, 1881, and Callao<span class="pagenum" id="Page_65">65</span> -surrendered on January 18th. The last engagement -took place in September 1882, and a small army of -occupation was left in Peru.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>The Treaty of Peace was not ratified till April 1884. -Peru ceded to Chile the province of Tarapaca. The -provinces of Tacna and Arica were placed under -Chilean authority for ten years, after which they were -to decide their own future government. Chile, however, -eventually evaded compliance with this agreement -and retained forcible possession of the provinces. -Chile retained possession of the Bolivian seaboard, -thus cutting off Bolivia from access to the Pacific.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The aggressive attitude of Chile was a cause of -complaint with the neighbouring states, and nearly -led on more than one occasion to further conflict. -By a Treaty signed in 1905, however, Bolivia at last -ceded all claims to a seaport and strip of coast. Chile, -except for a civil war in 1891, is distinguished among -the South American States by its freedom from revolution -and serious political unrest.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_66">66</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_FRENCH_EXPEDITION_IN_TUNIS">THE FRENCH EXPEDITION IN TUNIS<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1881</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -France.<br /> -The Arabs of Tunis. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Tunis under the government of the Beys formed -part of the Ottoman Empire. In 1862 Italy began -to take an interest in Tunis. A triple British, French, -and Italian control over Tunisian finances was established -in 1869. In 1878, at the Congress of Berlin, -Great Britain came to a secret understanding to allow -France a free hand in Tunis in return for French -acquiescence in the British lease of Cyprus.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>In 1880 the Italians bought the British railway -from Tunis to Golitta. France, under the pretext -of chastising independent tribes in the north-east, -determined to take action.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>A French force marched on the capital. The conquest -of the country was not effected without serious -resistance, specially at Sjax, but finally the whole -country was brought completely under French jurisdiction, -and the Bey was compelled to accept a French -protectorate.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Bardo</i>, May 12, 1881, and a further -<i>Treaty of La Marsa</i>, June 8, 1883, the French protectorate -was established. Italy did not recognize -the full consequences of the French protectorate till -1896. Protests by Turkey were ignored by France, -and in 1892 the Ottoman Government was prepared<span class="pagenum" id="Page_67">67</span> -to delimit the Tunis-Tripoli frontier. But there were -various frontier incidents, and Turkey maintained -the claim that the Tunisians were Ottoman subjects.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The occupation of Tunis led to an estrangement -between France and Italy.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_68">68</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_EGYPTIAN_WAR">THE EGYPTIAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1882</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain.<br /> -Egypt. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Since 1840, while Egypt had been virtually independent, -Great Britain had been regarded as the special -champion of Turkish suzerainty; France as the protector -of the Viceroys of Egypt. The construction -of the Suez Canal, chiefly engineered by France and -Great Britain, made Egypt of new importance, as the -direct route to India now lay through the Red Sea. -An Anglo-French financial control was established to -secure payment of interest on the enormous sums lent -to the Khedive Ismail. British influence became -paramount, and the British Government gradually -assumed the responsibility for good government in -Egypt.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>An anti-Turkish revolt under Arabi Pasha broke out, -and there was a massacre of Christians in Alexandria -in June 1882. The Khedive was powerless. The -Powers met in conference at Constantinople, but -before any decision was arrived at the British Government -resolved to act.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The bombardment of Alexandria took place on -July 11, 1882, and the Egyptian troops set fire to the -town. The Sultan was willing to enter into a military -convention with Great Britain, but before it was -signed the Egyptians were defeated at Tel-el Kebir -by the British under Sir Garnet Wolseley, on September -13, 1882, and Arabi surrendered.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_69">69</span></p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>Arabi and other Pashas were banished to Ceylon.</p> - -<p>The military occupation of Egypt by Great Britain, -in spite of declarations to the effect that the troops -would shortly be withdrawn, and in spite of protests -from France, became permanent.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Till the Anglo-French agreement of 1904 France -adopted a more or less hostile attitude with regard -to Egypt. Many administrative and financial reforms -were introduced by Sir Evelyn Baring, afterwards -Lord Cromer. The government was practically taken -out of the hands of the Egyptians, and from time to -time there was trouble with a nationalist movement.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_70">70</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="FRANCO-CHINESE_WAR">FRANCO-CHINESE WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1884–1885</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -France.<br /> -China. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>France, after 1870, turned its attention more and -more to colonial expansion in Africa, and also in Asia, -where for some time efforts had been made by the -French to indemnify themselves in Indo-China for -the loss of Hindustan. In 1875 a vague treaty with -the Emperor of Annam gave France the protectorate. -The importance was realized of finding a path of penetration -towards China.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>In 1883–1884 an attempt was made to force the -Emperor of Annam to acknowledge the protectorate -and to secure the delta of Tonkin. The Chinese -Government, unwilling to have France as a neighbour, -took the offensive.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The French fleet destroyed the arsenal of Foochow, -took possession of Formosa, Kelung, and the Pescadores -Islands, and blockaded Southern China. A French -brigade was put to flight near Langsen. Incorrect -information as to the extent of the reverse caused -the overthrow of Jules Ferry’s ministry. But the -victories and blockade of the French fleet induced -China to accept peace.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Tientsin</i>, June 9, 1885, China -recognized the French protectorate in Tonkin and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_71">71</span> -Annam, and promised to open the southern provinces -to French traders.</p> - -<p>By treaties with Siam in 1893, and Great Britain -in 1892–1896, Cambodia came also under French protection, -and the Empire in Indo-China was consolidated.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>France definitely joined in the competition for -Imperial expansion.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_72">72</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_BURMESE_WARS">THE BURMESE WARS<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1823–1826, 1851, 1885</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain.<br /> -Burma. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The expansion of the British Empire in India involved -the subjection of neighbouring states. In -addition to this there was fear of the rivalry of France -in Burma.</p> - -<h3>Occasions:</h3> - -<p>(1) The conquest of Assam, which was under British -protection, by the King of Ava in 1823, and the attack -by him on a British fort at Shapur, led to the declaration -of war against Burma.</p> - -<p>(2) The insults offered to the British flag at Rangoon -by the King of Ava, led to the fresh outbreak of war -in 1851.</p> - -<p>(3) King Thibaw’s despotic rule and his design to -enter into an agreement with France, led to the last -Ultimatum in 1885.</p> - -<h3>Course of the Wars:</h3> - -<p>(I) A British force was defeated at Ramu, and the -first two attempts to reach Ava failed. Martaban -and Tennasserin were taken by the British, and the -Burmese were expelled from Rangoon in December -1824. Prome was reached in April 1825. Myede -was entered in December. In 1826 Sir Archibald -Campbell pushed on to Yandabu, forty-five miles from -Ava. By the treaty of peace February 24, 1826, the -British gained the provinces of Assam, Arakan, and -the coast of Tenasserim.</p> - -<p>(II) In April, 1852, as the King of Ava refused to -come to terms, Rangoon, Martaban, and Bassein were<span class="pagenum" id="Page_73">73</span> -taken by Dalhousie. Prome was taken in October, -and Pegu in November 1852. No treaty was signed -but the King was prepared to accept an accomplished -fact.</p> - -<p>(III) In 1885 the British Ultimatum took King -Thibaw by surprise, and within a fortnight he surrendered -unconditionally when the British force approached -his capital. Guerilla warfare continued for -nearly two years.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the proclamation of January 1, 1886, the whole -of Burma was annexed, and Thibaw was deported to -India.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The conquest of Burma was affected, not so much -because of the misrule of the Kings of Ava as from -a motive of Imperial expansion and the desire to -forestall the designs of France.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_74">74</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_SERBO-BULGARIAN_WAR">THE SERBO-BULGARIAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1885</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Bulgaria.<br /> -Serbia. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The Treaty of Berlin of 1878 left abundant material -for future conflict in European Turkey. Bulgaria -was confined to the north of the Balkan mountains, -and Eastern Roumelia was still under the Sultan. -Prince Alexander of Battenberg, the ruler of Bulgaria, -in September 1885, marched south and occupied -Philippopolis. The Sultan protested, the Czar was -indignant, but Great Britain approved the Union of -Roumelia with Bulgaria, and the danger of war passed -away. The success of Bulgaria whetted the appetite -of Milan, who had become King of Serbia in 1882. -With a view to strengthening the prestige of his dynasty -he adopted a spirited foreign policy and awaited an -opportunity.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>Frontier troubles and tariff disputes between the -two countries had embittered relations, and the King -of Serbia declared war, thinking he would have a -triumphal march to Sofia, the Russian officers having -withdrawn from the Bulgarian army.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Bulgarians gained a decisive victory at Slivnitsa -on November 16, 1885, and occupied Pirot, and -the road to Belgrade lay open before them. But -Austria intervened on behalf of Serbia, and after -fourteen days’ fighting an armistice was signed.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_75">75</span></p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Buckarest</i>, March 3, 1886, the -<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">status quo</i> was restored; Bulgaria gained nothing, but -established her right to Eastern Roumelia. Owing -to Russian intrigue Alexander was forced to abdicate -and was succeeded by Ferdinand of Saxe-Coburg as -Prince of Bulgaria.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Bulgaria became gradually the most advanced and -formidable state in the Balkans. In 1908, at the -time of the revolutionary crisis in Turkey and the -annexation of Bosnia and Herzogovina by Austria, -Ferdinand declared himself Czar of a completely -independent Bulgaria.</p> - -<p>Milan abdicated in 1889, and his son Alexander -became King of Serbia. He and his wife were murdered -in 1903 and Peter Karageorgevich accepted the -crown.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_76">76</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_CHINO-JAPANESE_WAR">THE CHINO-JAPANESE WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1894–1895</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Japan.<br /> -China and Korea. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Japan adopting Western ideas developed into a -powerful state with surprising rapidity during the -last fifty years of the nineteenth century. The growth -of her armaments and an ambition for expansion -necessarily followed. China, on the other hand, did -not welcome the influence of the West, which rapid -transit and communication had brought into Asia. -The weakness and misgovernment of Korea was a -perpetual temptation to her neighbours. Japan invited -China to co-operate in demanding reforms in -Korea, but China refused and Japan acted alone.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>In July 1894 Japan issued an Ultimatum calling -on Korea to accept a Japanese programme of reforms. -Korea temporized, and Seoul, the capital, was taken -without difficulty, the Emperor being made a prisoner. -China immediately intervened.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>By land and sea the Japanese, who had been trained -by European officers, were easily victorious. Asan -was occupied, a victory was gained off the Yalu River, -and the Japanese marched on Yingkow. Port Arthur, -on the Liao-Tung peninsula, was captured, finally -Wei-hai-Wei fell, and Li Hung Chang, the Chinese -Minister, sued for peace.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_77">77</span></p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Shimonoseki</i>, China ceded to Japan -the Liao Tung peninsula, the island of Formosa and -the Pescadores Islands, and the indemnity was fixed -at 200 million taels. But Russia, France, and Germany -intervened, and ordered Japan to surrender the Liao -Tung Peninsula on the ground that Port Arthur -threatened the independence of Peking. But the -insincerity of the intervention of the Western Powers -was revealed in 1897, when China was compelled to -lease Kiao Chow to Germany, Port Arthur to Russia, -Wei-hai-Wei to Great Britain, while France obtained -a concession near Tonkin. Only the Italian claim for -the port of Sanmen was refused by China.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The encroachments of the Western Powers evoked -intense indignation in China. The rivalry in the -exploitation of the Far East by the West had begun -in real earnest.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_78">78</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_ITALO-ABYSSINIAN_WAR">THE ITALO-ABYSSINIAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1895–1896</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Italy.<br /> -Abyssinia. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Having become a united nation, Italy soon developed -Imperialistic ambitions. She looked towards Tunis, -but was forestalled there by France in 1881. In 1884, -being secure from an attack by land, by an alliance -with Austria concluded in 1882, and being assured by -Great Britain that the occupation by a friendly Power -of certain positions on the Red Sea littoral would not -be regarded unfavourably, the Italian Government -decided on a forward policy in Africa.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>After a preliminary expedition in 1887, which was -unsuccessful and had to be recalled, a treaty was -made with Menelek, after the death of King John of -Abyssinia, which was interpreted in Italy as involving -Italian suzerainty over Abyssinia. Italy supported -Menelek against his rival Ras Mangascia.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Italian victories over the Dervishes at Agordat -(1893) and Cassala (1894) encouraged the ambition -of Italy for a vast African Empire. On a further -Italian advance in 1895 the Abyssinians united in -their resistance. Menelek repudiated all idea of a -protectorate, and General Baratieri suffered a disastrous -defeat at Adowah, March 1, 1896.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>The Italian suzerainty over Abyssinia was abandoned, -and by the Treaty of Peace signed in September 1900, -the frontiers of the Italian colony were reduced.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_79">79</span></p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The attempt on the part of Italy to hunt with the -lions in colonial aggrandizement ended in humiliation. -Italy was now able to devote its attention to much-needed -internal reforms. But the Imperialist policy -only died down to be revived later.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_80">80</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_WAR_IN_THE_SOUDAN">THE WAR IN THE SOUDAN<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1896–1898</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain—Egypt.<br /> -Arabs and Dervishes. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The Soudan had fallen into the hands of rebellious -tribes under the Mahdi. In 1883 on Egyptian force -under General Hicks had been defeated at El Obeid, -and General Baker was also defeated in his attempt to -relieve the Tokar garrison. The successes of a British -force near Suakin were rendered useless by the refusal -of the British Government to advance further. Early -in 1884 it was decided to despatch General Gordon, -who had an intimate knowledge of the country, to -bring away Europeans from the Soudan. On arriving -at Khartoum he was cut off from all communication -with Egypt, Berber and the Bahr-el-Gazal province -having fallen into the hands of the Mahdi. The relief -expedition was sent out too late to save him. Khartoum -fell, and Gordon was killed on January 25, 1885. The -whole of the Soudan remained under the rule of the -Mahdi for thirteen years. The British Government -came to the conclusion that Egypt could never be -considered permanently secure so long as a hostile -Power was in occupation of Khartoum.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>After the Italian defeat at Adowah it was decided -to create a diversion in Italian interests, and orders were -given to occupy the province of Dongola. Rumours -of the crumbling power of the Khalifa, who had -succeeded the Mahdi, strengthened the idea that it -was a favourable opportunity to advance into the -Soudan.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_81">81</span></p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>British and Egyptian troops under Kitchener occupied -Dongola September 23, 1896. In 1897 desert -railways were constructed, and Abu Hamed and -Berber were wrested from the dervishes. In 1898 -reinforcements of British troops were sent from Cairo. -Omdurman, the stronghold of Mahdism, was captured -on September 2, 1898, and two days later Khartoum -was occupied.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By an agreement between the British and Egyptian -Governments in January 1899, the Soudan was placed -under their joint control, the Governor-General to -be appointed by the Khedive on British recommendation.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The arrival of Major Marchand at Fashoda, in -September 1898, where he hoisted the French flag, -created a momentary excitement and talk of war, -but the British Government adopted a firm attitude, -and he received orders to withdraw.</p> - -<p>No opposition to the Anglo-Egyptian agreement -was encountered in Europe. The economic and agricultural -development of the Soudan has since progressed -rapidly.</p> - -<p>Nearly a million square miles were added to the -territory under British rule.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_82">82</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_TURKO-GREEK_WAR">THE TURKO-GREEK WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1897</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Turkey.<br /> -Greece. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Crete, which formed part of the Ottoman Dominion, -had been granted a Constitution in 1868. A revolt -in 1889 caused the Sultan to limit the powers of the -assembly and supersede the Christian governor by a -Mussulman. Disturbances broke out between Christians -and Mohammedans in the succeeding years. In -February 1897 the Christians proclaimed union with -Greece, and Colonel Vassos was sent with a force to -occupy the island in the King’s name. The Powers -intervened, and the Admirals occupied Canea. Neither -the Sultan nor the King wanted war. The King was -under the impression that the Powers would prevent it.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>Enthusiasm for war which was not accompanied by -any sort of military organization or preparation grew -up in Greece. When armed bands crossed the frontier -into Macedonia, Turkey immediately declared war -(April 17, 1897).</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Greek fleet, on which great hopes had been placed, -effected nothing. The Turkish forces occupied Larissa, -advanced across Thessaly, defeated the Greeks all -along the line, and on May 17, 1897, the victory of -Domokos opened to the Turks the pass which leads -down to Lamia. The Powers intervened, and a -armistice was signed.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_83">83</span></p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the treaty of peace signed at Constantinople, -December 4, 1897, the Turks evacuated Thessaly, and -certain strategic alterations were made in the frontier. -Greece paid an indemnity of four millions, and accepted -the European control of her finances. Crete continued -to be the arena of periodic conflict. Prince -George of Greece was appointed High Commissioner -of the Powers under a new Constitution, but he resigned -in 1906. While virtually Greek the island -remained under the suzerainty of the Sultan.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This was only one of the many Balkan conflicts. -The intervention of the Powers was invoked in order -to check any increase in the dominion of the Sultan. -But owing to their own conflicting ambitions and the -inherent racial complications in the Balkans, they -never at any time reached a solution of the problems -involved.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_84">84</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_SPANISH-AMERICAN_WAR">THE SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1897–1898</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Spain.<br /> -The United States of America. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The decline of the Spanish Colonial Empire (which -had reached its highest point under Philip II at the -end of the sixteenth century) continued throughout -the seventeenth, eighteenth, and early nineteenth -century, and was hastened by the misgovernment, -corruption, and incessant outbreaks of revolution in -Spain itself. One by one by means of revolution, -the Spanish-American colonies had gained their independence. -The policy of the Holy Alliance and of -Metternich was to check the growth of Constitutional -government in Europe. King Ferdinand of Spain -was in conflict with the constitutional movement, -and civil war prevailed. In 1823 France intervened -in Spain on behalf of Ferdinand, and French troops -entered Madrid. Canning, on behalf of Great Britain, -prohibited the conquest by France or her allies of the -Spanish colonies, and formally recognized their independence -in 1824. Cuba and other islands were the -last of the Spanish possessions. During the remainder -of the nineteenth century Spain continued periodically -to be torn and weakened by internal disturbances.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>In order to quell the revolts in Cuba more effectually -the milder policy of Martinez Campos was exchanged -in 1897 for the ruthless and brutal rule of -General Weyler. The United States were deeply -stirred by the torture and starvation of their neighbours. -General Weyler was recalled. But when the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_85">85</span> -American cruiser <i>Maine</i> was blown up in the port of -Havana, the United States demanded the evacuation -of Cuba by Spain. Spain refused.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>Two Spanish fleets were destroyed in May and July -1898, and American land forces in Cuba, the Philippines, -and Porto Rico won those islands with comparatively -little struggle.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the treaty of peace signed at Paris, December -1898, Spain surrendered practically all her colonies. -The Caroline Islands in the Pacific were sold to -Germany in 1899.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This was the last chapter in the extinction of a vast -colonial Empire, which was dissolved owing to the -spirit of independence in its various states and the -bad government in the Mother Country.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_86">86</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_BOER_WAR">THE BOER WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1881, 1899–1902</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain.<br /> -The Transvaal and Orange Free State. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The premature annexation of the Transvaal in 1877 -was resented by the majority of the Boers. In 1880 -a formidable rebellion broke out, a small British force -was sent out which met with determined opposition at -Laing’s Nek and Ingogo, and on February 27, 1881, -was defeated at Majuba Hill. The Boers regained their -independence under the suzerainty of Great Britain.</p> - -<p>Cecil Rhodes, with vast ideas of Imperial expansion, -became the dominating influence in South Africa. -In 1884 Bechuanaland was annexed. In 1889 Rhodes -founded the British South Africa Company. In -1896, after a successful conflict with the Matabeles, -Buluwayo was captured and Matabeleland added to -the territory of Rhodesia. In 1886 gold had been -discovered in the Transvaal, and a great cosmopolitan -city arose at Johannesburg. This resulted in -an enormous influx of Europeans and the decision -of the Boers to exclude them from any share in the -political life of the country. Behind Rhodes, who -became Prime Minister of Cape Colony in 1895, great -financial interests grew up and exerted considerable -influence. Under the presidency of Kruger the Boers -adopted a more and more hostile attitude towards -the Outlanders. In 1895 the Jameson Raid, which -was connived at by the authorities, revived Kruger’s -power, which had been waning, and made the Boers -arm in preparation for a further surprise.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>A promise of intervention was sent by the British -Government in reply to a petition from the Outlanders -in 1899. Attempts to reach a compromise with<span class="pagenum" id="Page_87">87</span> -Kruger failed. Both sides were preparing for war, -and the mining interests exerted great pressure. On -October 9, 1899, the Transvaal issued an Ultimatum.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Boers invaded Natal and Cape Colony; -Ladysmith, Mafeking, and Kimberley were invested. -British defeats at Magersfontein, Stormberg, and Colenso -(December 1899) led to Lord Roberts being sent out to -supersede General Buller. Kimberley and Ladysmith -were relieved, Bloemfontein fell. In May 1900 Mafeking -was relieved, and in June Johannesburg and Pretoria -were occupied. The attempt to insist on unconditional -surrender prolonged the war for two more years.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Vereeniging</i>, May 1902, the Transvaal -lost its independence. The Orange Free State -had been annexed in 1900. Under pressure from -the financial interests Chinese were introduced to -work the gold-mines. This was one of the chief -reasons for the fall of the Conservative Government -in 1906. Campbell-Bannerman, who became Prime -Minister, solved the problem of the future of the -Transvaal by granting them full self-government, -and the importation of Chinese was stopped.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>The origin of the war can be directly traced to -far less worthy causes than that of redressing the -grievances of the Outlanders. The war was unnecessarily -prolonged by an underestimate of the strength -of the Boers and the desire to humiliate them. But the -grant of self-government was the act that saved -the war from being barren in results and from being -the precursor of further trouble. The Union of South -Africa was established in 1909.</p> - -<p>The Powers of Europe, with the exception of Italy, -adopted an unfriendly attitude towards Great Britain -during the war.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_88">88</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_BOXER_RISING_IN_CHINA">THE BOXER RISING IN CHINA<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1899–1900</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Great Britain, Russia, Germany, France, and Japan.<br /> -China. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>The humiliating results of the war of 1894–5 (p. 72) -killed the reform movement in China and brought the -reactionary party, headed by the Dowager-Empress, -back to power. A society called the Boxers spread -very rapidly through the provinces, preaching death -to foreigners and receiving official support.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>Attacks on Europeans began in 1899, and became -very frequent in the early months of 1900. In May -the Ministers at Peking asked for additional guards. -The Boxers surrounded the city, and Admiral Seymour’s -attempt to reach the capital was frustrated. The -destruction of the Taku Fort by the Allies was treated -as a declaration of war, and Chinese Imperial troops -joined the Boxers.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The settlements at Tientsin were rescued by a Russian -force. An allied force made its way through from -Taku, and forced an entry into Pekin. In August a -relief column of 18,000 allied troops defeated the -Chinese in several engagements and marched on Pekin. -The legations had for eight weeks withstood a siege. -The Chinese Government gave foreigners twenty-four -hours to leave the capital. The German Minister -was murdered in the street. The British Legation -formed the refuge of all those who were driven out -of their places of retreat. When the relieving force<span class="pagenum" id="Page_89">89</span> -arrived the Chinese only made a faint-hearted defence. -The Empress fled, the legations were relieved, and -Pekin was occupied.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the peace protocol, which was signed on September -7, 1901, the punishment of the ringleaders was -demanded: the forts between Pekin and the sea were -dismantled, permanent guards for the legations were -established, and a large indemnity was fixed.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Official intercourse with the Chinese Government -was established on a more satisfactory basis. But -serious trouble in the Far East and internal disturbances -in China itself continued.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_90">90</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="THE_RUSSO-JAPANESE_WAR">THE RUSSO-JAPANESE WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1904–1905</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Russia.<br /> -Japan. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>When Port Arthur, which Japan had been forced -to surrender in 1895, was seized by Russia there was -deep indignation in Japan. In 1902 a treaty of -alliance was concluded between Great Britain and -Japan. Russia undertook to evacuate Manchuria, -and although the withdrawal of troops began in 1903, -instead of continuing the evacuation Russia demanded -new concessions. In Korea Russian speculators obtained -concessions, and influential members of the -Russian Court were interested in the enterprise. Japan -protested.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>A treaty regulating the position in Manchuria and -Korea was suggested by Japan, but Russia refused -to recognize Japan’s paramount influence in Korea, -and after several months of fruitless negotiation Japan -issued an Ultimatum in February 1904.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>After successful initial encounters on the part of -Japan, Port Arthur was surrendered on January 1, -1905. After a Japanese victory at Mukden, the -Russians retreated. In October 1904 the Russian -fleet, coming round from the Baltic, opened fire on a -group of Hull fishing smacks in crossing the Dogger -Bank, mistaking them for torpedo boats. The incident -roused considerable indignation in Britain, but -the Czar expressed his regrets. The matter was<span class="pagenum" id="Page_91">91</span> -referred to a commission of admirals in Paris, and -compensation was awarded for the damage done. On -May 27, 1905 the Russian fleet was annihilated by -Admiral Togo at Tsushima. The Japanese landed a -force in Sakhalin, but, both sides being exhausted and -anxious for peace, negotiations were opened in August -1905.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Portsmouth</i>, August 1905, the -claims of Japan in Korea were recognized; Russia -agreed to evacuate Manchuria and ceded the Liao-Tung -peninsula (including Port Arthur) and the -southern half of Sakhalin to Japan. The payment -of an indemnity, which had been the chief obstacle -to the conclusion of peace, was waived by Japan. -The moderation of the Japanese demands made a -good impression in the world, but was resented in -Japan itself.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>This was a war of pure aggression, backed by high -financial speculation on the part of Russia. The easy -triumph of Japan was a surprise. But she was fighting -for definite national objects, while the Russian people -knew nothing of the cause and aims of the war. Russia -spent much money in subsequent years in restoring -her lost armaments. From this time on the reform -movements and revolutionary spirit in Russia grew -rapidly.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_92">92</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="TURKO-ITALIAN_WAR">TURKO-ITALIAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1911–1912</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Italy.<br /> -Turkey. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>After the agreements with regard to North Africa -between Great Britain and France, Italy made up her -mind that the time was favourable for a decisive move -with a view to expansion, and proceeded to make -careful preparations for military action early in 1911. -The position in Tripoli was made the subject of heated -discussion in the Press, and the Turks were charged -with showing gross unfairness to Italian residents. -The possible designs of Germany in North Africa also -induced the Italian Government to take advantage of -the first opportunity for an offensive step.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>The Turks, foreseeing danger, sent war stores and -munitions to Tripoli, and on September 29, 1911, the -Italians, with their fleet ready and their troops embarked, -declared war.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>On September 30th, Tripoli was blockaded and -occupied by the Italians on October 5th; Benghazi fell -on October 20th. In spite of the publication of a decree -annexing Tripoli as a province of Italy, the advance -of the invaders was kept in check. Austria refused -to allow operations in the Adriatic. Russia would -not permit the blockade of the Dardanelles. Fighting -continued with indeterminate results and in a desultory -manner until a treaty of peace was finally signed at -Ouchy on October 15, 1912.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_93">93</span></p> - -<h3>Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Lausanne</i>, October 15, 1912, Turkish -forces were withdrawn from Tripoli and Cyrenaica, -the Italians promised to withdraw from the occupied -islands of the Ægean, and a commercial agreement -was concluded between the two countries. There was -no recognition by the Turkish Government of Italian -sovereignty in Tripoli. It was enough for Italy that -her sovereignty was recognized by the Powers. This -was done, France delaying her assent until Italy surrendered -certain privileges in Morocco.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Italy’s aggressive action was prompted by a desire -not to be left behind in the competition for territorial -acquisitions in Africa.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_94">94</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="FIRST_BALKAN_WAR">FIRST BALKAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1912–1913</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece, Montenegro.<br /> -Turkey. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>Even after the deposition of the Sultan, Abdul Hamid, -and the triumph of the Young Turks in the revolution -of 1908 the misgovernment of Turkey did not cease, -more especially in Macedonia, where the European -Powers had entirely failed to secure any reforms, but -produced an intolerable situation in the Balkan Peninsula. -Despairing of the successful intervention of -the Powers the Balkan States determined to take -matters into their own hands. For the first time an -alliance was formed between Greece, Bulgaria, and -Serbia for the purpose of destroying the Turkish Empire -in Europe.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>In September 1912 the Powers, through Austria, -Hungary, and Russia strongly deprecated the outbreak -of war. The Allies simultaneously handed in to the -Turkish Government an Ultimatum demanding certain -specified reforms. No reply was sent. The Turks -underestimated the strength of their opponents, and -hoped to detach Greece. War broke out October 17th.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Turkish forces were completely overwhelmed. -They were defeated by the Serbians at Kumanovo, -October 24, 1912, and Uskub was occupied: the Greeks -drove the enemy north and occupied Salonika: and -the Bulgarians defeated the Ottoman army at Lule -Burgas, October 31st, and advanced to Chatalja. After<span class="pagenum" id="Page_95">95</span> -an armistice and an abortive attempt of the Powers -to secure peace, the war broke out again. Adrianople -fell March 26, 1913, and the Turks submitted.</p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of London</i> Bulgaria was given a frontier -from Enos on the Mediterranean to Midia on the Black -Sea. The future of Albania was to be decided by the -Allies and Turkey ceded the island of Crete to Greece.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Serious disputes as to the disposal of the spoils won -from Turkey led immediately to the outbreak of war -among the Allies.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_96">96</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="SECOND_BALKAN_WAR">SECOND BALKAN WAR<br /> - -<span class="subhead">1913</span></h2> -</div> - -<h3>Belligerents:</h3> - -<p class="bellig"> -Serbia, Greece, Montenegro, Roumania.<br /> -Bulgaria.<br /> -Turkey. -</p> - -<h3>Cause:</h3> - -<p>In February 1912 a treaty was concluded between -Bulgaria and Serbia, whereby it was agreed that North-west -Macedonia should go to Serbia, another part to -Bulgaria, and the zone lying between these two should -be submitted to the arbitration of the Czar. In -December 1912, in the First Balkan War, Austria -protested against the occupation by Serbia of Durazzo -on the Adriatic, and of Scutari by Montenegro. Serbia -declared that Bulgaria did not adequately support -her in resisting the Austrian demand, felt impelled to -claim more territory in Macedonia, and refused to carry -out the provisions of the treaty with Bulgaria. Serbia -was ready to arbitrate. Russia was inclined to support -the Serbian claim. Bulgaria hesitated.</p> - -<h3>Occasion:</h3> - -<p>While the dispute was still in the balance the aggressive -party in Bulgaria got the upper hand, and war -was declared against Serbia and Greece in June 24, -1913, only a few months after the cessation of hostilities -in the First Balkan War.</p> - -<h3>Course of the War:</h3> - -<p>The Bulgarians found themselves invaded on four -frontiers. While they were being driven back by -Serbia and Greece, the Turks repudiated the Treaty -of London and retook Adrianople, and Roumania -advanced from the north and without striking a blow -annexed a large slice of territory in the Dobrudja. -Bulgaria was obliged to yield.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_97">97</span></p> - -<h3>Political Result:</h3> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Bukarest</i>, August 10, 1913, Serbia -acquired a large district of South-east Macedonia, -Greece obtained Kavalla, and Roumania was given -possession of the territory her troops had occupied.</p> - -<p>By the <i>Treaty of Constantinople</i>, August 1913, -Bulgaria ceded back to Turkey more than half of the -territory won in the previous war, including Adrianople.</p> - -<h3>Remarks:</h3> - -<p>Bulgaria being again restricted in territory felt she -had been betrayed by the Powers, who did nothing -to enforce the engagements of the Treaty of London. -Her rivals, Serbia and Greece, gained at her expense. -On the other hand, Bulgarian responsibility for the -outbreak of the second war was undoubted.</p> - -<p>The European Powers, by acting together, prevented -the Balkan conflict from spreading into a European -War. But the Treaty of Bukarest was no settlement, -and was a signal exposure of their inability to solve -the Balkan problem, which was destined to be the -spark for a world-wide conflagration.</p> -</div> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_98">98</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="IMPORTANT_TREATIES">IMPORTANT TREATIES<br /> - -<span class="subhead">(OTHER THAN THOSE ALREADY MENTIONED)</span></h2> -</div> - -<div class="treaties"> -<blockquote> - -<p>The <i>Treaty of Vienna</i>, June 9, 1815.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>Second Treaty of Paris</i>, November 20, 1815,<br /> -Signed by Great Britain, Austria, Prussia, Russia, -France at the conclusion of the Napoleonic Wars.</p> - -<p class="in">France gave up certain fortresses on the frontier -but retained Alsace-Lorraine. Payment of 700 million -francs was exacted from France. The greater part -of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw fell to Russia, Posen -to Prussia, and Cracow became a republic. Prussia -got back nearly all her old possessions, and there -was a reconstruction of German States under a Confederation. -Holland, Belgium, and Luxemburg were -established as an independent kingdom under the -House of Orange: Switzerland was extended and her -integrity guaranteed: Sardinia obtained Genoa and -other territory: Austria received an extension of -territory in North Italy and on the coast of the Adriatic, -and became the dominant state in the German -Confederation. The Pope and the King of the Two -Sicilies regained their former possessions.</p> - -<p class="in">[The foregoing record of wars serves to show to what -a small extent this treaty secured the settlement of -European territorial problems.]</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Rushe-Bagot Treaty</i>, April 1817, between Great Britain -and the United States. The two powers agreed to -withdraw their battleships from the Great Lakes.</p> - -<p class="in">It may be noted that the absence of armaments -on the whole Canadian frontier cannot be said to -have endangered the relations between the two -countries in view of the fact that the Anglo-American -peace centenary was celebrated in 1915.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p id="twash"><i>The Treaty of Washington</i>, May 8, 1871, between Great -Britain and the United States. The north-western<span class="pagenum" id="Page_99">99</span> -boundary was finally delimited: an attempt was -made to settle the Canadian Fishery dispute, and it -was agreed to refer the Alabama Claims to a tribunal -of arbitration, which subsequently fixed the sum to -be paid over by Great Britain as indemnity.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Triple Alliance</i> in 1882 was the result of Italy joining -the alliance between Germany and Austria, which had -grown out of the support given to Austria as against -Russia at the Congress of Berlin in 1878, Italy having -become estranged from France after the occupation -of Tunis in 1881. The Triple Alliance was renewed -for five years in 1887 and in 1891, and again in 1902 -it was extended for a term of twelve years.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Berlin Act.</i> The outcome of the Conference of Berlin, -1884–5, at which fourteen Powers were represented. -The respective spheres of influence of the European -Powers in Africa were delimited. The neutrality of -the Congo Free State was recognized, and it was established -as an independent State under the sovereignty -of the King of the Belgians. An area was marked -out in which there should be free trade, which should -be excluded from effects of disputes between the signatory -Powers, and be placed under the rule of neutrality.</p> - -<p class="in">The latter stipulation has, however, not been carried -out.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Suez Canal Convention</i> signed by nine Powers at Constantinople, -October 29, 1888. Lesseps obtained the -preliminary concession for the construction of the Canal -in 1856. The Canal was opened in 1869. Disraeli -bought four million pounds’ worth of shares from the -Khedive on behalf of the British Government in 1875. -The Convention ensured that the Canal should always -be open to vessels of commerce and war without distinction -of flag. Great Britain signed with a reservation, -but in the Anglo-French agreement of 1904 -declared her adherence to the Convention and agreed -to its being put into force.</p></blockquote> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_100">100</span></p> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Hay-Pauncefote Treaty</i>, November 18, 1901, between -Great Britain and the United States, gave the United -States right of control in time of war of the Panama -Canal. The Clayton-Bulwer Treaty of 1850, which -established a joint Anglo-American protectorate over -the Canal was thereby abrogated.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Anglo-Japanese Alliance.</i> Treaties signed in London -January 30, 1902, and August 12, 1905. The integrity -and independence of China was recognized. If either -Great Britain or Japan should be attacked and involved -in a war with two Powers, they engaged mutually to -assist one another. The aim of the alliance was officially -defined as “the consolidation and maintenance of -general peace in the regions of Eastern Asia and of -India.” In 1911 the treaty was revised, a clause -stipulating that there was no obligation to go to war -with a Power with whom a treaty of arbitration was in -force. This removed the danger of Great Britain being -involved in a war between Japan and the United States.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Argentine-Chile Treaty</i>, 1902. From 1840 to 1900 -constant boundary disputes arose between the two -countries, which invariably led to war. At last the -people themselves in both countries decided by large -majorities to negotiate a peaceful settlement of the -dispute. The delimitation of the frontier was carried -out by a mixed commission, and to commemorate the -treaty an immense statue of Christ was erected on a -high pass in the Andes on the boundary line.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Anglo-French Convention</i>, April 8, 1904.</p> - -<p class="in">This removed outstanding causes of friction between -the two countries, and was the foundation of the Entente.</p> - -<p class="in">Newfoundland fisheries and West African boundary -problems were settled: the Siamese, New Hebrides, -and Madagascar disputes were settled: Egypt was -declared exclusively under British protection, and -Morocco was left to France. A Franco-Spanish Convention -was concluded in October of the same year<span class="pagenum" id="Page_101">101</span> -with regard to Morocco. To both these treaties secret -clauses were attached which amounted virtually to the -prospective partition of Morocco by France and Spain.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Agreement of Karlstadt</i>, September 23, 1905.</p> - -<p class="in">The Union between Sweden and Norway was dissolved, -and Norway recognized as an independent -kingdom.</p> - -<p class="in">The movement in favour of separation had grown -rapidly from 1899. It was resisted by the King of -Sweden. A plebiscite in Norway declared in favour -of it, and agreement was reached without any armed -conflict.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Algeciras Act</i>, April 7, 1906, agreed to by thirteen -Powers, was based on the sovereignty, independence, -integrity, and economic liberty of Morocco. The provisions -concerned the organization of police, regulation -of taxation, customs, etc. This Act was disregarded -by France in 1911, when a French force was sent to -Fez and occupied the country.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Anglo-Russian Convention</i>, September 23, 1907.</p> - -<p class="in">Persia was divided so as to give Great Britain and -Russia spheres of influence with a neutral zone between. -(Persia was not a party to the treaty.) An -agreement was come to with regard to Afghanistan -and Thibet, settling all points where dispute might -arise.</p></blockquote> - -<blockquote> - -<p><i>The Anglo-American Arbitration Treaty</i>, April 4, 1908.</p> - -<p class="in">By this Treaty differences between Great Britain -and the United States which do not affect the vital -interests, independence, or honour of either country, -or which do not concern the interests of third parties -are referred to the Permanent Court of Arbitration -at the Hague.</p></blockquote> -</div> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_102">102</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="INDEX_OF_TREATIES">INDEX OF TREATIES</h2> -</div> - -<table id="index" summary="Index of Treaties"> - <tr class="small"> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdr">PAGE</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Adrianople, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Akerman, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_16">16</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Algeciras Act</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_101">101</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Anglo-French Convention</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_100">100</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Anglo-Japanese Alliance</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_100">100</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Anglo-American Arbitration</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_101">101</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Anglo-Russian Convention</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_101">101</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Argentine-Chile Treaty</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_100">100</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Bardo, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_66">66</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Berlin, Treaty of (1850)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Berlin, Treaty of (1878)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_59">59</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Berlin Act</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_99">99</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Bukarest, Treaty of (1886)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_75">75</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Bukarest, Treaty of (1913)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_97">97</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Constantinople, Treaty of (1897)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_83">83</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Constantinople, Treaty of (1913)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_97">97</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Frankfort, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_55">55</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Gandamuk, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_58">58</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Guadalupe-Hidalgo, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_30">30</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Hay-Pauncefote Treaty</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_100">100</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Karlstadt, Agreement of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_101">101</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">La Marsa, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_66">66</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Lausanne, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_93">93</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">London, Treaty of (1834)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_21">21</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">London, Treaty of (1839)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_19">19</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">London, Treaty of (1852)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_49">49</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_103">103</span></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">London, Treaty of (1913)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_95">95</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Nanking, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_28">28</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Paris, Treaty of (1815)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_98">98</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Paris, Treaty of (1856)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_37">37</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Paris, Treaty of (1898)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_85">85</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Portsmouth, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_91">91</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Prague, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_51">51</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Rushe-Bagot Treaty</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_98">98</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">San Stefano, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_59">59</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Shimonoseki, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_77">77</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Suez Canal Convention</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_99">99</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Tientsin, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_66">66</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Triple Alliance</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_99">99</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Unkiar Skelessi, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_24">24</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Vereenigen, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_87">87</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Vienna, Treaty of (1815)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_98">98</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Vienna, Treaty of (1866)</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_35">35</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Villa Franca, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_35">35</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Washington, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></td></tr> - <tr class="first"> - <td class="tdl">Zurich, Treaty of</td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_35">35</a></td></tr> -</table> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_104">104</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="BIBLIOGRAPHY">BIBLIOGRAPHY</h2> -</div> - -<p class="center smaller b2">(<i>Each war has its own literature. Only a few leading authorities -and books easily accessible to students are given here.</i>)</p> - -<p class="in0 vspace b2"> -The Cambridge Modern History, vols. xi, xii.<br /> - -Modern Europe. C. A. Fyffe.<br /> - -A Political History of Contemporary Europe. Seignobos.<br /> - -History of our own Times. Justin McCarthy.<br /> - -A Century of British Foreign Policy. Gooch and Masterman.<br /> - -History of our Time (1885–1911). G. P. Gooch.<br /> - -Wars of the Nineties. Atteridge.<br /> - -The Map of Europe by Treaty. Hertslet.<br /> - -International Law. C. E. Hall.<br /> - -The Termination of War and Treaties of Peace. Coleman Philipson.<br /> - -Three Centuries of Treaties of Peace. Sir W. Philimore.<br /> - -Turkey in Europe. Sir C. Eliot.<br /> - -Nationality and War in the Near East. A Diplomatist.<br /> - -The New Map of Europe. H. A. Gibbons.<br /> - -Historical Atlas of Modern Europe. Robertson and Bartholomew.<br /> - -The Balkan War. Lieut.-Col. Rankine.<br /> - -History of the Greek Revolution. G. Finlay.<br /> - -History of Italian Unity. Bolton King.<br /> - -The Far Eastern Question. M. V. Chirol.<br /> - -The History of South America. Akers.<br /> - -The American Civil War. F. L. Paxon.<br /> - -The Downfall of Spain. Wilson.<br /> - -The Invasion of the Crimea. A. W. Kinglake.<br /> - -Modern Egypt. Lord Cromer.<br /> - -The War in South Africa. Hobson.<br /> - -The War of Steel and Gold. H. N. Brailsford.<br /> - -Nationalism, War, and Society. E. Krehbiel.<br /> - -Ten Years of Secret Diplomacy. E. D. Morel.<br /> - -Imperialism. J. A. Hobson.<br /> - -International Tribunals. Evans Darby. -</p> - -<p class="p2 center small vspace narrow bt"><i>Printed in Great Britain by</i><br /> - -UNWIN BROTHERS, LIMITED, THE GRESHAM PRESS, WOKING AND LONDON</p> - -<div class="chapter"><div class="transnote"> -<h2 id="Transcribers_Notes" class="nobreak p1">Transcriber’s Notes</h2> - -<p>Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made -consistent when a predominant preference was found -in the original book; otherwise they were not changed.</p> - -<p>Simple typographical errors were corrected; unbalanced -quotation marks were remedied when the change was -obvious, and otherwise left unbalanced.</p> - -<p>Text sometimes uses colons where current convention -is to use semi-colons.</p> - -<p>The index was not checked for proper alphabetization -or correct page references.</p> - -<p>Page <a href="#Page_9">9</a>: The Austro-Prussian War began in 1866, not -in 1860. The error has not been corrected here.</p> - -<p>Page <a href="#Page_43">43</a>: “Savanah” was printed that way.</p> - -<p>Page <a href="#Page_86">86</a>: “Buluwayo” was printed that way.</p> -</div></div> - - - - - - - - -<pre> - - - - - -End of Project Gutenberg's Wars & Treaties, 1815-1914, by Arthur Ponsonby - -*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WARS & TREATIES, 1815-1914 *** - -***** This file should be named 60026-h.htm or 60026-h.zip ***** -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: - http://www.gutenberg.org/6/0/0/2/60026/ - -Produced by Turgut Dincer, Charlie Howard, and the Online -Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This -file was produced from images generously made available -by The Internet Archive) - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will -be renamed. - -Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright -law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, -so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United -States without permission and without paying copyright -royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part -of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm -concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, -and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive -specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this -eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook -for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, -performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given -away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks -not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the -trademark license, especially commercial redistribution. - -START: FULL LICENSE - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full -Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at -www.gutenberg.org/license. - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or -destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your -possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a -Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound -by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the -person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph -1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this -agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the -Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection -of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual -works in the collection are in the public domain in the United -States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the -United States and you are located in the United States, we do not -claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, -displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as -all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope -that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting -free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm -works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the -Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily -comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the -same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when -you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are -in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, -check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this -agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, -distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any -other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no -representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any -country outside the United States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other -immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear -prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work -on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, -performed, viewed, copied or distributed: - - This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and - most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no - restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it - under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this - eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the - United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you - are located before using this ebook. - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is -derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not -contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the -copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in -the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are -redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply -either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or -obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm -trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any -additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms -will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works -posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the -beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including -any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access -to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format -other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official -version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site -(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense -to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means -of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain -Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the -full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -provided that - -* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed - to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has - agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid - within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are - legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty - payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in - Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg - Literary Archive Foundation." - -* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all - copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue - all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm - works. - -* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of - any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of - receipt of the work. - -* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than -are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing -from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The -Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm -trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project -Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may -contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate -or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other -intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or -other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or -cannot be read by your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium -with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you -with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in -lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person -or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second -opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If -the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing -without further opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO -OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT -LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of -damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement -violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the -agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or -limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or -unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the -remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in -accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the -production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, -including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of -the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this -or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or -additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any -Defect you cause. - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of -computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It -exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations -from people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future -generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see -Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at -www.gutenberg.org Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by -U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the -mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its -volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous -locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt -Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to -date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and -official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -For additional contact information: - - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND -DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular -state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To -donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project -Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be -freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and -distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of -volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in -the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not -necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper -edition. - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search -facility: www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. - - - -</pre> - -</body> -</html> diff --git a/old/60026-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/60026-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index bbdfe5e..0000000 --- a/old/60026-h/images/cover.jpg +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/60026-h/images/title.jpg b/old/60026-h/images/title.jpg Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 2b5edd6..0000000 --- a/old/60026-h/images/title.jpg +++ /dev/null |
