summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/60007-h/60007-h.htm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/60007-h/60007-h.htm')
-rw-r--r--old/60007-h/60007-h.htm17534
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 17534 deletions
diff --git a/old/60007-h/60007-h.htm b/old/60007-h/60007-h.htm
deleted file mode 100644
index 4b34c84..0000000
--- a/old/60007-h/60007-h.htm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,17534 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
-<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
-
-<head>
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
- <title>
- Earthquakes and Other Earth Movements, by John Milne–A Project Gutenberg eBook
- </title>
-
- <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" />
-
- <style type="text/css">
- body {
- margin-left: 10%;
- margin-right: 10%;
- }
-
- h1, h2, h3, h4 {
- text-align: center;
- clear: both;
- }
-
- h1 {
- font-size: 250%;
- font-weight: normal;
- margin-top: 8%;
- margin-bottom: 2%;
- page-break-before: avoid;
- }
-
- h2 {
- margin-top: 5%;
- margin-bottom: 2%;
- font-size: 130%;
- page-break-before: avoid;
- }
-
- h3 {
- font-size: medium;
- font-weight: normal;
- margin-top: 5%;
- }
-
- h4 {
- font-size: small;
- font-weight: normal;
- margin-top: 3%;
- margin-bottom: 1%;
- }
-
- .chapter {
- clear: both;
- margin-top: 10%;
- page-break-before: always;
- }
-
- p {
- margin-top: .5em;
- text-align: justify;
- margin-bottom: .5em;
- text-indent: 1em;
- }
-
- .hang1 {
- padding-left: 3.0em;
- text-indent: -2.0em;
- }
-
- .hang2 {
- padding-left: 3.0em;
- text-indent: -1.0em;
- }
-
- hr {
- width: 35%;
- margin: 1% 32.5%;
- clear: both;
- }
-
- hr.page {
- width: 65%;
- margin: 5% 17.5%;
- }
-
- hr.tb {
- width: 45%;
- margin: 3% 27.5%;
- }
-
- hr.r15 {
- width: 15%;
- margin: auto 42.5%;
- }
-
- sub { font-size: x-small; }
- sup { font-size: x-small; }
-
- /* === fonts === */
- .large { font-size: large; }
- .xlarge { font-size: x-large; }
- .xxlarge { font-size: xx-large; }
- .ssmall { font-size: 90%; }
- .small { font-size: small; }
- .xsmall { font-size: x-small; }
- .smcap { font-variant: small-caps; }
- .gespertt { letter-spacing: 0.1em; }
- .s { visibility: hidden; }
-
- /* === Alignment === */
- .mt0 { margin-top: 0; }
- .mt1 { margin-top: 1%; }
- .mt2 { margin-top: 2%; }
- .mt3 { margin-top: 3%; }
- .mt10 { margin-top: 10%; }
- .mb0 { margin-bottom: 0; }
- .mb1 { margin-bottom: 1.5%; }
- .mb2 { margin-bottom: 2%; }
- .ml5 { margin-left: 10%; }
- .mr1 { margin-right: 1%; }
- .pt2 { padding-top: 2%; }
- .pl0 { padding-left: 0; }
- .pr0 { padding-right: 0; }
- .pr1 { padding-right: 4%; }
- .lh1 { line-height: 1em; }
- .center { text-align: center; }
- .icenter { text-align: center; display:inline-block; }
- .left { text-align: left; }
- .right {
- float: right;
- vertical-align: middle;
- }
- .vatop { vertical-align: top}
- .vm { vertical-align: middle; }
- .nowrap { display: inline-block; }
-
- .noindent {
- text-indent: 0;
- margin-left: 0%;
- }
-
- .rightinset {
- text-align: right;
- margin-right: 2%;
- }
-
- .subhead {
- font-size: small;
- margin-top: 3%;
- display: inline-block;
- }
-
- .summary {
- font-size: small;
- font-weight: normal;
- margin-bottom: 2%;
- display: inline-block;
- text-align: justify;
- padding-left: 1.4em;
- text-indent: -1.4em;
- }
-
- /* === Page #s === */
- .pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
- /* visibility: hidden; */
- right: 1%;
- font-size: x-small;
- background-color: inherit;
- color: silver;
- text-indent: 0;
- text-align: right;
- position: absolute;
- border: thin solid silver;
- padding: .1em .2em;
- font-style: normal;
- font-variant: normal;
- font-weight: normal;
- text-decoration: none;
- }
-
- ul {
- list-style-type: none;
- text-align: left;
- display: inline-block;
- }
-
- ol {
- text-align: left;
- text-indent: 0.6em;
- display: inline-block;
- }
-
- li.biblio {
- text-align: justify;
- text-indent: -1em;
- padding-left: 1.2em;
- margin-top: 0.4em;
- margin-bottom: 0.4em;
- }
-
- .list-container { text-align: center; }
-
- /* === Tables === */
- table { margin: auto; }
-
- th {
- font-size: small;
- text-align: center;
- padding-right: 0.4em;
- padding-left: 0.4em;
- }
-
- td {
- vertical-align: middle;
- padding-right: 0.4em;
- padding-left: 0.4em;
- padding-top: 0;
- padding-bottom: 0;
- }
-
- .tdpage {
- font-size: x-small;
- line-height: 50%;
- }
-
- .tdpage div { text-align: right; }
-
- .tdl {
- text-align: left;
- padding-left: 1.4em;
- text-indent: -1.0em;
- }
-
- .tdl0 {
- text-align: left;
- padding-left: 0.8em;
- text-indent: -1.4em;
- }
-
- .tdr div {
- text-align: right;
- padding-right: 0.4em;
- }
- .tdc div { text-align: center; }
-
- .tdrt { vertical-align: top; }
- .tdrt div { text-align: right; }
-
- .tdrx div {
- text-align: right;
- padding-right: 1.5em;
- }
-
- .tdrb {
- padding-left: 0;
- vertical-align: bottom;
- }
- .tdrb div { text-align: right; }
-
- .tdr0 div {
- text-align: right;
- padding-left: 0;
- }
-
- .tdr1 {
- text-align: right;
- padding-right: 0;
- }
-
- .tdhang {
- text-align: left;
- padding-left: 1.2em;
- text-indent: -1.2em;
- }
-
- .tdc {
- text-align: center;
- margin-top: 5%;
- margin-bottom: 2%;
- }
-
- .tdh {
- text-align: center;
- margin-top: 5%;
- margin-bottom: 2%;
- font-size: large;
- }
-
- .tdr2 {
- text-align: right;
- padding-right: 15%;
- }
-
- table { border-collapse: collapse; }
-
- .collapse { border-collapse: collapse; }
-
- table#AbbotsResults {
- border-collapse: collapse;
- }
- table#AbbotsResults th {
- border: 1px solid black;
- }
- table#AbbotsResults td {
- border: 1px solid black;
- }
-
- table#amplitude2 {
- border-collapse: collapse;
- }
- table#amplitude2 th {
- border: 1px solid black;
- }
-
- table#propogation td {
- vertical-align: top;
- }
-
- .br { border-right: 1px solid black; }
- .bb { border-bottom: 1px solid black; }
- .bl { border-left: 1px solid black; }
- .ball { border: 1px solid black; }
-
- /* === Footnotes === */
- .footheader {
- font-size: 150%;
- text-align: center;
- text-decoration: underline;
- margin-bottom: 2%;
- }
- .footnotes {
- border: dashed 1px;
- margin-top: 10%;
- text-align: justify
- }
- .footnote {
- margin-left: 10%;
- margin-right: 10%;
- margin-bottom: 1%;
- font-size: 0.9em;
- }
- .footnote .label {
- position: absolute;
- right: 84%;
- text-align: right;
- }
-
- .fnanchor {
- vertical-align: super;
- font-size: .8em;
- text-decoration: none;
- }
-
- /* === Images === */
- .figcenter {
- margin: 3% auto 2% auto;
- text-align: center;
- page-break-inside: avoid;
- }
-
- .caption {
- margin-bottom: 1%;
- font-size: 90%;
- text-align: center;
- }
-
- img {
- max-width: 100%;
- height: auto;
- }
-
- .iglyph-a {
- width: auto;
- vertical-align: -0.6em;
- }
-
- .iglyph-b {
- width: auto;
- vertical-align: -2.0em;
- }
-
- .x200 {
- font-size: 220%;
- padding-bottom: 1%;
- padding-right: 0;
- text-align: right;
- line-height: 0.8em;
- }
-
- .x200a {
- font-size: 220%;
- vertical-align: -0.4em;
- }
-
- .x200b {
- font-size: 220%;
- vertical-align: -0.2em;
- }
-
- .x300 {
- font-size: 350%;
- padding-bottom: 30%;
- text-align: right;
- line-height: 0.8em;
- }
-
- .x300a {
- font-size: 350%;
- padding-right: 0;
- padding-left: 0;
- line-height: 80%;
- vertical-align: 0.2em;
- }
-
- .x400 {
- font-size: 480%;
- padding-bottom: 2%;
- padding-right: 0;
- padding-left: 0;
- text-align: right;
- line-height: 0.8em;
- }
-
- /* === Math === */
- span.frac {
- display: inline-block;
- position: relative;
- vertical-align: middle;
- font-size: 120%;
- text-align: center;
- text-indent: 0;
- }
-
- span.frac > sup {
- display: block;
- font-size: medium;
- }
-
- span.frac > span {
- display: none;
- }
-
- span.frac > sub {
- display: block;
- border-top: thin solid black;
- font-size: medium;
- }
-
- span.sqrt {
- padding-top: 2%;
- border-top: thin solid black;
- }
-
- span.sqrt2 {
- padding-top: 0.3em;
- padding-left: 0.2em;
- padding-right: 0.2em;
- border-top: medium solid black;
- }
-
- span.sqrt3 {
- border-top: thin solid black;
- }
-
- @media screen, print {
- .figright {
- float: right;
- margin: 1% 0 1% 2%;
- page-break-inside: avoid;
- }
-
- .figleft {
- float: left;
- margin: 1% 2% 1% 0;
- page-break-inside: avoid;
- }
- }
-
- @media handheld {
- body { margin: 0; }
-
- /* page break instead of rule for chapter heading */
- hr.page { display: none; }
-
- h2 { page-break-before: always; }
-
- /* repeating these here seems to override epubmaker 'float' treatment */
- .figright {
- float: right;
- margin: 1% 0 1% 2%;
- page-break-inside: avoid;
- }
-
- .figleft {
- float: left;
- margin: 1% 2% 1% 0;
- page-break-inside: avoid;
- }
- }
-
- /* === Transcriber's notes === */
- .transnote {
- background-color: #E6E6FA;
- color: black;
- font-size: smaller;
- padding: 0.5em;
- margin-bottom: 5em;
- font-family: sans-serif, serif;
- }
-
- </style>
-</head>
-
-<body>
-
-
-<pre>
-
-Project Gutenberg's Earthquakes and Other Earth Movements, by John Milne
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
-other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
-the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
-to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
-
-Title: Earthquakes and Other Earth Movements
-
-Author: John Milne
-
-Release Date: July 29, 2019 [EBook #60007]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK EARTHQUAKES, OTHER EARTH MOVEMENTS ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by deaurider, Robert Tonsing, and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
-file was produced from images generously made available
-by The Internet Archive)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-</pre>
-
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img id="coverpage" src="images/cover.jpg" width="529" height="800" alt="" />
- </div>
-
- <hr class="page" />
-
- <div class="center xlarge">
- <b>THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SERIES<br />
- VOLUME LV</b>
- </div>
-
- <hr class="page" />
-
- <div class="chapter">
- <div class="center mb1"><b>THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SERIES</b></div>
- <hr class="r15" />
- <h1><span class="gespertt">EARTHQUAKES</span><br />
- <span class="small">AND</span><br />
- <span class="xlarge gespertt">OTHER EARTH MOVEMENTS</span>
- </h1>
- </div>
-
- <div class="center mt10">
- <span class="small">BY</span><br />
- <span class=" large gespertt">JOHN MILNE</span><br />
- <span class="xsmall">PROFESSOR OF MINING AND GEOLOGY IN THE IMPERIAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,<br />
- TOKIO, JAPAN</span>
- </div>
-
- <div class="center small mt10"><i>WITH THIRTY-EIGHT FIGURES</i></div>
-
- <div class="center mt10">NEW YORK<br />
- <span class="large gespertt">D. APPLETON AND COMPANY</span><br />
- <span class="smcap small">1, 3, and 5 BOND STREET</span><br />
- 1886
- </div>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="PREFACE">
- <h2 class="gespertt xxlarge">PREFACE</h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/divider.png" width="80" height="9" alt="" />
- </div>
-
- <p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">In</span> the following pages it has been my object to give a systematic
- account of various Earth Movements.</p>
-
- <p>These comprise <em>Earthquakes</em>, or the sudden violent movements of the
- ground; <em>Earth Tremors</em>, or minute movements which escape our attention
- by the smallness of their amplitude; <em>Earth Pulsations</em>, or movements
- which are overlooked on account of the length of their period; and
- lastly, <em>Earth Oscillations</em>, or movements of long period and large
- amplitude which attract so much attention from their geological
- importance.</p>
-
- <p>It is difficult to separate these Earth Movements from each other,
- because they are phenomena which only differ in degree, and which are
- intimately associated in their occurrence and in their origin.</p>
-
- <hr class="tb" />
-
- <p>Because Earthquakes are phenomena which have attracted a universal
- attention since the earliest times, and about them so many observations
- have been made, they are treated of at considerable length.</p>
-
- <p>As very much of what might be said about the other Earth Movements is
- common to what is said about Earthquakes,
- <span class="pagenum">vi</span>it has been possible to make
- the description of these phenomena comparatively short.</p>
-
- <p>The scheme which has been adopted will be understood from the following
- table:—</p>
-
- <table class="ssmall" summary="Book scheme">
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3" class="tdc"><div>I. <span class="smcap">Earthquakes</span>.</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3" class="tdl">1. Introduction.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3" class="tdl">2. Seismometry.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">3. Earthquake Motion.</td>
- <td><div class="x300">{</div></td>
- <td class="tdl0">
- <div>(<i>a</i>) Theoretically.</div>
- <div>(<i>b</i>) As deduced from experiments.</div>
- <div>(<i>c</i>) As deduced from actual Earthquakes.</div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">4. Earthquake Effects.</td>
- <td><div class="x200">{</div></td>
- <td class="tdl0">
- <div>(<i>a</i>) On land.</div>
- <div>(<i>b</i>) In the ocean.</div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3" class="tdl">5. Determination of Earthquake origins.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">6. Distribution of Earthquakes.</td>
- <td><div class="x300">{</div></td>
- <td class="tdl0">
- <div>(<i>a</i>) In space.</div>
- <div>(<i>b</i>) In time (geological time, historical time, annual, seasonal, diurnal, &amp;c.)</div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3" class="tdl">7. Cause of Earthquakes.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3" class="tdl">8. Earthquake prediction and warning.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3" class="tdc"><div>II. <span class="smcap">Earth Tremors</span>.</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3" class="tdc"><div>&nbsp; III. <span class="smcap">Earth Pulsations</span>.</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3" class="tdc"><div>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;IV. <span class="smcap">Earth Oscillations</span>.</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p class="noindent">In some instances the grouping of phenomena according to the above
- scheme may be found inaccurate, as, for example, in the chapters
- referring to the effects and causes of Earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>This arises from the fact that the relationship between Earthquakes
- and other Earth phenomena are not well understood. Thus the sudden
- elevation of a coast line and an accompanying earthquake may be
- related, either as effect and cause, or <i xml:lang="la">vice versâ</i>, or they may both
- be the effect of a third phenomenon.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum">vii</span></p>
-
- <p>Much of what is said respecting Earthquake motion will show how little
- accurate knowledge we have about these disturbances. Had I been writing
- in England, and, therefore, been in a position to make references to
- libraries and persons who are authorities on subjects connected with
- Seismology, the following pages might have been made more complete,
- and inaccuracies avoided. A large proportion of the material embodied
- in the following pages is founded on experiments and observations
- made during an eight years’ residence in Japan, where I have had the
- opportunity of recording an earthquake every week.</p>
-
- <p>The writer to whom I am chiefly indebted is Mr. Robert Mallet. Not
- being in a position to refer to original memoirs, I have drawn many
- illustrations from the works of Professor Karl Fuchs and M. S. di
- Rossi. These, and other writers to whom reference has been made, are
- given in an appendix.</p>
-
- <p>For seeing these pages through the press, my thanks are due to
- Mr. Thomas Gray, who, when residing in Japan, did so much for the
- advancement of observational Seismology.</p>
-
- <p>For advice and assistance in devising experiments, I tender my thanks
- to my colleagues, Professor T. Alexander, Mr. T. Fujioka, and to my
- late colleague. Professor John Perry.</p>
-
- <p>For assistance in the actual observation of Earthquakes, I have to
- thank my friends in various parts of Japan, especially Mr. J. Bissett
- and Mr. T. Talbot, of Yokohama. For assistance in obtaining information
- from<span class="pagenum">viii</span>
- Italian sources I have to thank Dr. F. Du Bois, from German
- sources Professor C. Netto, and from Japanese sources Mr. B. H.
- Chamberlain. For help in carrying out experiments, I am indebted to
- the liberality of the British Association, the Geological Society of
- London, the Meteorological and Telegraph departments of Japan, and to
- the officers of my own institution, the Imperial College of Engineering.</p>
-
- <p>And, lastly, I offer my sincere thanks to those gentlemen who have
- taken part in the establishment and working of the Seismological
- Society of Japan, and to my publishers, whose liberality has enabled me
- to place the labours of residents in the Far East before the European
- public.</p>
-
- <p class="rightinset"><span class="smcap">John Milne.</span></p>
-
- <p class="small"><span class="smcap">Tokio, Japan</span>; <i>June</i> 30, 1883</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter">
- <span class="pagenum">ix</span>
- <h2 class="gespertt xxlarge">CONTENTS.</h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/divider.png" width="80" height="9" alt="" />
- </div>
-
- <table class="mt0" summary="Contents">
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">INTRODUCTION.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td></td>
- <td class="tdpage"><div>PAGE</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Relationship of man to nature—The aspect of a country is dependent
- on geological phenomena—Earthquakes an important
- geological phenomenon—Relationship of seismology to the
- sciences and arts—Earth movements other than earthquakes—Seismological
- literature—(Writings of Perrey, Mallet, Eastern
- writings, the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,
- the ‘Gentleman’s Magazine,’ the Bible, Herodotus, Pliny, Hopkins,
- Von Hoff, Humboldt, Schmidt, Seebach, Lasaulx, Fuchs,
- Palmieri, Bertelli, Seismological Society of Japan)—Seismological
- terminology
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>1</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">SEISMOMETRY.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Nature of earthquake vibrations—Many instruments called seismometers
- only seismoscopes—Eastern seismoscopes, columns, projection
- seismometers—Vessels filled with liquid—Palmieri’s
- mercury tubes—The ship seismoscope—The cacciatore—Pendulum
- instruments of Kreil, Wagner, Ewing, and Gray—Bracket
- seismographs—West’s parallel motion instrument—Gray’s conical
- pendulums, rolling spheres, and cylinders—Verbeck’s ball
- and plate seismograph—The principle of Perry and Ayrton—Vertical
- motion instruments—Record receiver—Time-recording
- apparatus—The Gray and Milne seismograph
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>12</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <span class="pagenum">x</span>
- <a href="#CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTHQUAKE MOTION DISCUSSED THEORETICALLY.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Ideas of the ancients (the views of Travagini, Hooke, Woodward,
- Stukeley, Mitchell, Young, Mallet)—Nature of elastic waves
- and vibrations—Possible causes of disturbance in the earth’s
- crust—The time of vibration of an earth particle—Velocity and
- acceleration of a particle—Propagation of a disturbance as determined
- by experiments upon the elastic moduli of rocks—The
- intensity of an earthquake—Area of greatest overturning moment—Earthquake
- waves—Reflexion, refraction, and interference
- of waves—Radiation of a disturbance
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>41</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTHQUAKE MOTION AS DEDUCED FROM EXPERIMENT.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Experiments with falling weights—Experiments with explosives—Results
- obtained from experiments—Relative motion of two
- adjacent points—The effect of hills and excavations upon the
- propagation of vibrations—The intensity of artificial disturbances—Velocity
- with which earth vibrations are propagated—Experiments
- of Mallet—Experiments of Abbot—Experiments
- in Japan—Mallet’s results—Abbot’s results—Results obtained
- in Japan
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>57</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTHQUAKE MOTION AS DEDUCED FROM OBSERVATION
- ON EARTHQUAKES.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Result of feelings—The direction of motion—Instruments as indicators
- of direction—Duration of an earthquake—Period of
- vibration—The amplitude of earth movements—Side of greatest
- motion—Intensity of earthquakes—Velocity and acceleration of
- an earth particle—Absolute intensity of an earthquake—Radiation
- of an earthquake—Velocity of propagation
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>67</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <span class="pagenum">xi</span>
- <a href="#CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">EFFECTS PRODUCED BY EARTHQUAKES UPON BUILDINGS.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- The destruction of buildings is not irregular—Cracks in buildings—Buildings
- in Tokio—Relation of destruction to earthquake
- motion—Measurement of relative motion of parts of a building
- shaken by an earthquake—Prevention of cracks—Direction of
- cracks—The pitch of roofs—Relative position of openings in a
- wall—The last house in a row—The swing of buildings—Principle
- of relative vibrational periods
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>96</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">EFFECTS PRODUCED UPON BUILDINGS (<i>continued</i>).</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Types of buildings used in earthquake countries—In Japan, in Italy,
- in South America, in Caraccas—Typical houses for earthquake
- countries—Destruction due to the nature of underlying rocks—The
- swing of mountains—Want of support on the face of hills—Earthquake
- shadows—Destruction due to the interference of
- waves—Earthquake bridges—Examples of earthquake effects—Protection
- of buildings—General conclusions
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>122</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_VIII">CHAPTER VIII.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">EFFECTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON LAND.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- 1. Cracks and fissures—Materials discharged from fissures—Explanation
- of fissure phenomena. 2. Disturbances in lakes, rivers,
- springs, wells, fumaroles, &amp;c.—Explanation of these latter phenomena.
- 3. Permanent displacement of ground—On coast lines—Level
- tracts—Among mountains—Explanation of these movements
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>146</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_IX">CHAPTER IX.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">DISTURBANCES IN THE OCEAN.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Sea vibrations—Cause of vibratory blows—Sea waves: preceding
- earthquakes; succeeding earthquakes—Magnitude of waves
- <span class="pagenum">xii</span>—Waves
- as recorded in countries distant from the origin—Records
- on tide gauges—Waves without earthquakes—Cause of waves—Phenomena
- difficult of explanation—Velocity of propagation—Depth
- of the ocean—Examples of calculations—Comparison of
- velocities of earthquake waves with velocities which ought to
- exist from the known depth of the ocean
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>163</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_X">CHAPTER X.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">DETERMINATION OF EARTHQUAKE ORIGINS.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Approximate determination of an origin—Earthquake-hunting in
- Japan—Determinations by direction of motion—Direction indicated
- by destruction of buildings—Direction determined by
- rotation—Cause of rotation—The use of time observations—Errors
- in such observations—Origin determined by the method
- of straight lines—The method of circles, the method of hyperbolas,
- the method of co-ordinates—Haughton’s method—Difference
- in time between sound, earth, and water waves—Method of Seebach
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>187</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XI">CHAPTER XI.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">THE DEPTH OF AN EARTHQUAKE CENTRUM.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- The depth of an earthquake centrum—Greatest possible depth of
- an earthquake—Form of the focal cavity
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>213</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XII">CHAPTER XII.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">DISTRIBUTION OF EARTHQUAKES IN SPACE AND TIME.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- General distribution of earthquakes—Occurrence along lines—Examples
- of distribution—Italian earthquake of 1873—In Tokio—Extension
- of earthquake boundaries—Seismic energy in relation
- to geological time; to historical time—Relative frequency of
- earthquakes—Synchronism of earthquakes—Secondary earthquakes
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>226</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <span class="pagenum">xiii</span>
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XIII">CHAPTER XIII.</a>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td><div class="center small">DISTRIBUTION OF EARTHQUAKES IN TIME (<i>continued</i>).</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>234</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XIV">CHAPTER XIV.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">DISTRIBUTION OF EARTHQUAKES IN TIME (<i>continued</i>).</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- The occurrence of earthquakes in relation to the position of the
- heavenly bodies—Earthquakes and the moon—Earthquakes and
- the sun; and the seasons; the months—Planets and meteors—Hours
- at which earthquakes are frequent—Earthquakes and
- sun spots—Earthquakes and the aurora
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>250</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XV">CHAPTER XV.</a><br />
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl small">
- BAROMETRICAL FLUCTUATIONS AND EARTHQUAKES—FLUCTUATIONS IN TEMPERATURE AND EARTHQUAKES
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>266</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XVI">CHAPTER XVI.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">RELATION OF SEISMIC TO VOLCANIC PHENOMENA.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Want of synchronism between earthquakes and volcanic eruptions—Synchronism
- between earthquakes and volcanic eruptions—Conclusion
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>270</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XVII">CHAPTER XVII.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">THE CAUSE OF EARTHQUAKES.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Modern views respecting the cause of earthquakes—Earthquakes
- due to faulting—To explosions of steam—To volcanic evisceration—To
- chemical degradation—Attractive influence of the
- heavenly bodies—The effect of oceanic tides—Variation in atmospheric
- pressure—Fluctuation in temperature—Winds and
- earthquakes—Rain and earthquakes—Conclusion
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>277</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <span class="pagenum">xiv</span>
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XVIII">CHAPTER XVIII.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">PREDICTION OF EARTHQUAKES.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- General nature of predictions—Prediction by the observation of unusual
- phenomena (Alteration in the appearance and taste of
- springs; underground noises; preliminary tremors; Earthquake
- prophets—warnings furnished by animals, &amp;c.)—Earthquake warning
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>297</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XIX">CHAPTER XIX.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTH TREMORS.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Artificially produced tremors—Observations of Kater, Denman,
- Airy, Palmer, Paul—Natural tremors—Observations of Zöllner,
- M. d’Abbadie, G. H. and H. Darwin—Experiments in Japan—With
- seismoscopes, microphones, pendulums—Work in Italy—Bertelli,
- Count Malvasia, M. S. di Rossi—Instruments employed
- in Italy—Tromometers, microseismographs, microphones—Results
- obtained in Italy—In Japan—Cause of microseismic motion
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>306</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XX">CHAPTER XX.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTH PULSATIONS.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Definition of an earth pulsation—Indications of pendulums—Indications
- of levels—Other phenomena indicating the existence of
- earth pulsations—Disturbances in lakes and oceans—Phenomena
- resultant on earth pulsations—Cause of earth pulsations
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>326</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2">
- <div class="tdh">
- <a href="#CHAPTER_XXI">CHAPTER XXI.</a><br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTH OSCILLATIONS.</span>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">
- Evidences of oscillation—Examples of oscillation—Temple of Jupiter
- Serapis—Observations of Darwin—Causes of oscillation
- </td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>344</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td><div class="tdl mt3"><a href="#APPENDIX">APPENDIX</a></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>349</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td><div class="tdl mt3"><a href="#INDEX">INDEX</a></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb"><div>359</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_I">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_1">1</span>
- <div class="xxlarge center"><b>EARTHQUAKES</b>.</div>
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/divider.png" width="80" height="9" alt="" />
- </div>
- <h2>CHAPTER I.<br />
- <span class="subhead">INTRODUCTION.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">Relationship of man to nature—The aspect of a country is dependent
- on geological phenomena—Earthquakes an important geological
- phenomenon—Relationship of seismology to the sciences and
- arts—Earth movements other than earthquakes—Seismological
- literature—(Writings of Perrey, Mallet, Eastern writings, the
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, the ‘Gentleman’s
- Magazine,’ the Bible, Herodotus, Pliny, Hopkins, Von Hoff,
- Humboldt, Schmidt, Seebach, Lasaulx, Fuchs, Palmieri, Bertelli,
- Seismological Society of Japan)—Seismological terminology.</div>
-
- <p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">In</span>
- bygone superstitious times lightning and thunder were regarded
- as supernatural visitations. But as these phenomena became better
- understood, and men learned how to avoid their destructive power, the
- superstition was gradually dispelled. Thus it is with Earthquakes:
- the more clearly they are understood, the more confident in the
- universality of law will man become, and the more will his mental
- condition be advanced.</p>
-
- <p>In his ‘History of Civilisation in England,’ Buckle has laid
- considerable stress upon the manner in which earthquakes, volcanoes,
- and other of the more terrible forms in which the workings of
- nature reveal themselves<span class="pagenum" id="Page_2">2</span>
- to us, have exerted an influence upon the
- imagination and understanding; and just as a sudden fright may affect
- the nerves of a child for the remainder of its life, we have in the
- annals of seismology records which indicate that earthquakes have not
- been without a serious influence upon the mental condition of whole
- communities.</p>
-
- <p>To a geologist there are perhaps no phenomena in nature more
- interesting than earthquakes, the study of which is called Seismology.
- Coming, as shocks often will, from a region of volcanoes, the study
- of these disturbances may enable us to understand something about
- the nature and working of a volcano. As an earthquake wave travels
- along from strata to strata, if we study its reflections and changing
- velocity in transit, we may often be led to the discovery of certain
- rocky structures buried deep beneath our view, about which, without the
- help of such waves, it would be hopeless ever to attain any knowledge.</p>
-
- <p>By studying the propagation of earthquake waves the physicist is
- enabled to confirm his speculations respecting the transmission of
- disturbances in elastic media. For the physicist earthquakes are
- gigantic experiments which tell him the elastic moduli of rocks as
- they exist in nature, and when properly interpreted may lead him to
- the proper comprehension of many ill-understood phenomena. It is not
- impossible that seismological investigation may teach us something
- about the earth’s magnetism, and the connection between earthquakes and
- the ‘earth currents’ which appear in our telegraph wires. These and
- numerous other kindred problems fall within the domain of the physicist.</p>
-
- <p>It is of interest to the meteorologist to know the connections which
- probably exist between earthquakes and the fluctuations of the
- barometer, the changes of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">3</span>
- thermometer, the quantity of rainfall,
- and like phenomena to which he devotes his attention.</p>
-
- <p>Next we may turn to the more practical aims of seismology and ask
- ourselves what are the effects of earthquakes upon buildings, and
- how, in earthquake-shaken countries, the buildings are to be made to
- withstand them. Here we are face to face with problems which demand
- the attention of engineers and builders. To attain what we desire,
- observation, common sense, and subtle reasoning must be brought to bear
- upon this subject.</p>
-
- <p>In the investigation of the principle on which earthquake instruments
- make their records, in the analysis of the results they give, in
- problems connected with astronomy, with physics, and with construction,
- seismology offers to the mathematician new fields for investigation.</p>
-
- <p>A study of the effects which earthquakes produce on the lower animals
- will not fail to interest the student of natural history.</p>
-
- <p>A study like seismology, which leads us to a more complete knowledge
- of earth-heat and its workings, is to be regarded as one of the
- corner-stones of geology. The science of seismology invites the
- co-operation of workers and thinkers in almost every department of
- natural science.</p>
-
- <p>We have already referred to the influence exerted by earthquakes over
- the human mind. How to predict earthquakes, and how to escape from
- their dangers, are problems which, if they can be solved, are of
- extreme interest to the world at large.</p>
-
- <p>In addition to the sudden and violent movements which we call
- earthquakes, the seismologist has to investigate the smaller motions
- which we call earth tremors. From observations which have been made
- of late years,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">4</span>
- it would appear that the ground on which we dwell is
- incessantly in a state of tremulous motion.</p>
-
- <p>A further subject of investigation which is before the seismologist is
- the experimental verification of the existence of what may be called
- ‘earth-pulsations.’ These are motions which mathematical physicists
- affirmed the existence of, but which, in consequence of the slowness of
- their period, have hitherto escaped observation.</p>
-
- <p>The oscillations, or slow changes in the relative positions of land and
- sea, might also be included; but this has already been taken up as a
- separate branch of geology.</p>
-
- <p>These four classes of movements are no doubt interdependent, and
- seismology in the widest sense might conveniently be employed to
- include them all. In succeeding chapters we will endeavour to indicate
- how far the first three of these branches have been prosecuted, and
- to point out that which remains to be accomplished. It is difficult,
- however, to form a just estimate of the amount of seismological work
- which has been done, in consequence of the scattered and uncertain
- nature of many of the records. Seismology, as a science, originated
- late, chiefly owing to the facts that centres of civilisation are
- seldom in the most disturbed regions, and that earthquake-shaken
- countries are widely separated from each other.</p>
-
- <p>As every portion of the habitable globe appears to have been shaken
- more or less by earthquakes, and as these phenomena are so terrible in
- their nature, we can readily understand why seismological literature is
- extensive. In the annals of almost every country which has a written
- history, references are made to seismic disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>An idea of the attention which earthquakes have received may be
- gathered from the fact that Professor Alexis Perrey, of Dijon, who
- has published some sixty memoirs<span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">5</span>
- on this subject, gave, in 1856, a
- catalogue of 1,837 works devoted to seismology.<a id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a>
- In 1858 Mr. Robert
- Mallet published in the Reports of the British Association a list of
- several hundred works relating to earthquakes. Sixty-five of these
- works are to be found in the British Museum. So far as literature is
- concerned, earthquakes have received as much attention in the East as
- in the West. In China there are many works treating on earthquakes, and
- the attention which these phenomena received may be judged of from the
- fact that in <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 136 the Government appointed a commission
- to inquire into the subject. Even the isolated empire of Japan can
- boast of at least sixty-five works on earthquakes, seven of which
- are earthquake calendars, and twenty-three earthquake monographs.<a id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a>
- Besides those treating especially of earthquakes, there are innumerable
- references to such disturbances in various histories, in the
- transactions of learned societies, and in periodicals. To attempt to
- give a complete catalogue of even the books which have been written
- would be to enter on a work of compilation which would occupy many
- years, and could never be satisfactorily finished.</p>
-
- <p>In the ‘Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,’ which were
- issued in the eighteenth century, there are about one hundred and
- eighty separate communications on earthquakes; and in the ‘Gentleman’s
- Magazine’ for 1755 there are no less than fifty notes and articles on
- the same subject. The great interest shown in earthquakes about the
- years 1750–60 in England, was chiefly due to the terrible calamity
- which overtook Lisbon in 1755, and to the fact that about this time
- several shocks were experienced in various parts of the British
- Islands. In 1750, which may <span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">6</span>
- be described as the earthquake year of
- Britain, ‘a shock was felt in Surrey on March 14; on the 18th of the
- same month the whole of the south-west of England was disturbed. On
- April 2, Chester was shaken; on June 7, Norwich was disturbed; on
- August 23, the inhabitants of Lancashire were alarmed; and on September
- 30 ludicrous and alarming scenes occurred in consequence of a shock
- having been felt during the hours of Divine service, causing the
- congregations to hurry into the open air.’<a id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a>
- As might be expected,
- these occurrences gave rise to many articles and notes directing
- attention to the subject of earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>Seismic literature has not, however, at all times been a measure of
- seismic activity: thus, in Japan, the earthquake records for the
- twelfth and sixteenth centuries scarcely mention any shocks. At first
- sight it might be imagined that this was owing to an absence of
- earthquakes; but it is sufficiently accounted for by the fact that
- at that time the country was torn with civil war, and matters more
- urgent than the recording of natural phenomena engaged the attention of
- the inhabitants. Professor Rockwood, who has given so much attention
- to seismic disturbances in America, tells us that during the recent
- contest between Chili and Peru a similar intermission is observable. We
- see, therefore, that an absence of records does not necessarily imply
- an absence of the phenomena to be recorded.</p>
-
- <p>Perhaps the earliest existing records of earthquakes are those which
- occur in the Bible. The first of these, which we are told occurred in
- Palestine, was in the reign of Ahab (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 918–897).<a id="FNanchor_4" href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a>
- One of the most terrible earthquakes mentioned in the Bible is that which took
- place in the days of Uzziah, king of Judah (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 811–759),
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">7</span>
- which shook the ground and rent the Temple. The awful character of
- this, and the deep impression produced on men’s minds, may be learned
- from the fact that the time of its occurrence was subsequently used as
- an epoch from which to reckon dates.</p>
-
- <p>The writings of Herodotus, Pliny, Livy, &amp;c., &amp;c., show the interest
- which earthquakes attracted in early ages. These writers chiefly
- devoted themselves to references and descriptions of disastrous shocks,
- and to theories respecting the cause of earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>The greater portion of the Japanese notices of earthquakes is simply
- a series of anecdotes of events which took place at the time of
- these disasters. We also find references to superstitious beliefs,
- curious occurrences, and the apparent connection between earthquake
- disturbances and other natural phenomena. In these respects the
- literature of the East closely resembles that of the West. The
- earthquake calendars of the East, however, form a class of books which
- can hardly be said to find their parallel in Europe;<a id="FNanchor_5" href="#Footnote_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> while, on the
- other hand, the latter possesses types of books and pamphlets which do
- not appear to have a parallel elsewhere. These are the more or less
- theological works—‘Moral Reflections on Earthquakes,’ ‘Sermons’ which
- have been preached on earthquakes, ‘Prayers’ which have been appointed
- to be read.<a id="FNanchor_6" href="#Footnote_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a></p>
-
- <p>Speaking generally, it may be said that the writings of the ancients,
- and those of the Middle Ages, down to the commencement of the
- nineteenth century, tended to the propagation of superstition and to
- theories based on speculations with few and imperfect facts for their
- foundation.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">8</span></p>
-
- <p>Among the efforts which have been made in modern times to raise
- seismology to a higher level, is that of Professor Perrey, of Dijon,
- who commenced in 1840 a series of extensive catalogues embracing
- the earthquakes of the world. These catalogues enabled Perrey, and
- subsequently Mallet in his reports to the British Association, to
- discuss the periodicity of earthquakes, with reference to the seasons
- and to other phenomena, in a more general manner than it had been
- possible for previous workers to accomplish. The facts thus accumulated
- also enabled Mallet to discuss earthquakes in general, and the various
- phenomena which they present were sifted and classified for inspection.
- Another great impetus which observational seismology received was Mr.
- Mallet’s report upon the Neapolitan earthquake of 1857, in which new
- methods of seismic investigation were put forth. These have formed
- the working tools of many subsequent observers, and by them, as well
- as by his experiments on artificially produced disturbances, Mallet
- finally drew the study of earthquakes from the realms of speculation by
- showing that they, like other natural phenomena, were capable of being
- understood and investigated.</p>
-
- <p>In addition to Perrey and Mallet, the nineteenth century has produced
- many writers who have taken a considerable share in the advancement of
- seismology. There are the catalogues of Von Hoff, the observations of
- Humboldt, the theoretical investigations of Hopkins, the monographs of
- Schmidt, Seebach, Lasaulx, and others; the books of Fuchs, Credner,
- Vogt, Volger; the records and observations of Palmieri, Bertelli,
- Rossi, and other Italian observers. To these, which are only a few
- out of a long list of names, may be added the publications of the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">9</span>
- Commission appointed for the observation of earthquakes by the Natural
- History Society of Switzerland, and the volumes which have been
- published by the Seismological Society of Japan.</p>
-
- <p>Before concluding this chapter it will be well to define a few of the
- more ordinary terms which are used in describing earthquake phenomena.
- It may be observed that the English word <em>earthquake</em>, the German
- <i xml:lang="de">erdbeben</i>, the French <i xml:lang="fr">tremblement de terre</i>, the Spanish <i xml:lang="es">terremoto</i>,
- the Japanese <i xml:lang="ja">jishin</i> &amp;c., all mean, when literally translated,
- <em>earth-shaking</em>, and are popularly understood to mean a sudden and more
- or less violent disturbance.</p>
-
- <p>Seismology (σειμός an earthquake, λόγος a discourse)
- in its simplest sense means the study of earthquakes. To be consistent
- with a Greek basis for seismological terminology, some writers have
- thrown aside the familiar expression ‘earthquake,’ and substituted the
- awkward word ‘seism.’</p>
-
- <p>The source from which an earthquake originates is called the ‘origin,’
- ‘focal cavity,’ or ‘centrum.’</p>
-
- <p>The point or area on the surface of the ground above the origin is
- called the ‘epicentrum.’ The line joining the centrum and epicentrum is
- called the ‘seismic vertical.’</p>
-
- <p>The radial lines along which an earthquake may be propagated from the
- centrum are called ‘wave paths.’</p>
-
- <p>The angle which a wave path, where it reaches the surface of the earth,
- makes with that surface is called the ‘angle of emergence’ of the wave.
- This angle is usually denoted by the letter <i>e</i>.</p>
-
- <p>As the result of a simple explosion at a point in a homogeneous medium,
- we ought, theoretically, to obtain at points on the surface of the
- medium equidistant<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">10</span>
- from the epicentrum, equal mechanical effects.
- These points will lie on circles called ‘isoseismic’ or ‘coseismic’
- circles. The area included between two such circles is an ‘isoseismic
- area.’ In nature, however, isoseismic lines are seldom circles.
- Elliptical or irregular curves are the common forms.</p>
-
- <p>The isoseismic area in which the greatest disturbance has taken place
- is called the ‘meizoseismic area.’ Seebach calls the lines enclosing
- this area ‘pleistoseists.’</p>
-
- <p>These last-mentioned lines are wholly due to Mallet and Seebach.</p>
-
- <p>Many words are used to distinguish different kinds of earthquakes from
- each other. All of these appear to be very indefinite and to depend
- upon the observer’s feelings, which, in turn, depend upon his nervous
- temperament and his situation.</p>
-
- <p>In South America small earthquakes, consisting of a series of rapidly
- recurring vibratory movements not sufficiently powerful to create
- damage, are spoken of as <i xml:lang="es">trembelores</i>.</p>
-
- <p>The <i xml:lang="es">terremotos</i> of South America are earthquakes of a destructive
- nature, in which distinct shocks are perceptible. It may be observed
- that shocks which at one place would be described as <i xml:lang="es">terremoto</i>
- would at another and more distant place probably be described as
- <i xml:lang="es">trembelores</i>.</p>
-
- <p>The <i xml:lang="es">succussatore</i> are the shocks where there is considerable vertical
- motion. The terrible shock of Riobamba (February 4, 1797), which is
- said to have thrown corpses from their graves to a height of 100 feet,
- was an earthquake of this order.</p>
-
- <p>The <i xml:lang="es">vorticosi</i> are shocks which have a twisting or rotatory motion.</p>
-
- <p>Another method of describing earthquakes would be
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">11</span> to refer to
- instrumental records. When the vibrations of the ground have only
- been along the line joining the observer and the epicentrum, the
- disturbance might be called ‘euthutropic.’ A disturbance in which the
- prominent movements are <em>transverse</em> to the above direction might be
- called ‘diagonic.’ If motions in both of these directions occur in the
- records, the shock might be said to be ‘diastrophic.’ If there be much
- vertical movement, the shock might be said to be ‘anaseismic.’ Some
- disturbances could only be described by using two or three of these
- terms.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_II">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">12</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER II.<br />
- <span class="subhead">SEISMOMETRY.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Nature of earthquake vibrations—Many instruments called
- seismometers only seismoscopes—Eastern seismoscopes, columns,
- projection seismometers—Vessels filled with liquid—Palmieri’s
- mercury tubes—The ship seismoscope—The cacciatore—Pendulum
- instruments of Kreil, Wagner, Ewing, and Gray—Bracket
- seismographs—West’s parallel motion instrument—Gray’s conical
- pendulums, rolling spheres, and cylinders—Verbeck’s ball and
- plate seismograph—The principle of Perry and Ayrton—Vertical
- motion instruments—Record receivers—Time-recording apparatus—The
- Gray and Milne seismograph.</div>
-
- <p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">Before</span>
- we discuss the nature of earthquake motion, the determination
- of which has been the aim of modern seismological investigation, the
- reader will naturally look for an account of the various instruments
- which have been employed for recording such disturbances. A description
- of the earthquake machines which have been used even in Japan would
- form a bulky volume. All that we can do, therefore, is to describe
- briefly the more prominent features of a few of the more important of
- these instruments. In order that the relative merits of these may be
- better understood, we may state generally that modern research has
- shown a typical earthquake to consist of a series of small tremors
- succeeded by a shock, or series of shocks, separated by more or less
- irregular vibrations of the ground. The vibrations are often both
- irregular in period<span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">13</span>
- and in amplitude, and they have a duration of from
- a few seconds to several minutes. We will illustrate the records of
- actual earthquakes in a future chapter, but in the meantime the idea
- that an earthquake consists of a single shock must be dismissed from
- the imagination.</p>
-
- <p>To construct an instrument which at the time of an earthquake shall
- move and leave a record of its motion, there is but little difficulty.
- Contrivances of this order are called <em>seismoscopes</em>. If, however,
- we wish to know the period, extent, and direction of each of the
- vibrations which constitutes an earthquake, we have considerable
- difficulty. Instruments which will in this way measure or write down
- the earth’s motions are called <em>seismometers</em> or <em>seismographs</em>.</p>
-
- <p>Many of the elaborate instruments supplemented with electro-magnetic
- and clockwork arrangements are, when we examine them, nothing more than
- elaborate seismoscopes which have been erroneously termed seismographs.</p>
-
- <p>The only approximations to true seismographs which have yet been
- invented are without doubt those which during the past few years have
- been used in Japan. It would be a somewhat arbitrary proceeding,
- however, to classify the different instruments as seismoscopes,
- seismometers, and seismographs, as the character of the record given
- by certain instruments is sometimes only seismoscopic, whilst at other
- times it is seismometric, depending on the nature of the disturbance.
- Many instruments, for instance, would record with considerable accuracy
- a single sudden movement, but would give no reliable information
- regarding a continued shaking.</p>
-
- <p><em>Eastern Seismoscopes.</em>—The earliest seismoscope of which we find any
- historical record is one which owes its origin to a Chinese called
- Chôko. It was invented in the year <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 136. A description is
- given in the Chinese<span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">14</span>
- history called ‘Gokanjo,’ and the translation of
- this description runs as follows:—</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p014.jpg" width="400" height="473" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 1.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>‘In the first year of Yōka, <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 136, a Chinese called Chôko
- invented the seismometer shown in the accompanying drawing. This
- instrument consists of a spherically formed copper vessel, the diameter
- of which is eight feet. It is covered at its top, and in form resembles
- a wine-bottle. Its outer part is ornamented by the figures of different
- kinds of birds and animals, and old peculiar-looking letters. In the
- inner part of this instrument a column is so suspended that it can
- move in eight directions. Also, in the inside of the bottle, there is
- an arrangement by which some record of an earthquake is made according
- to the movement of the pillar. On the outside of the bottle there
- are eight dragon heads, each<span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">15</span>
- of which holds a ball in its mouth.
- Underneath these heads there are eight frogs so placed that they appear
- to watch the dragon’s face, so that they are ready to receive the ball
- if it should be dropped. All the arrangements which cause the pillar to
- knock the ball out of the dragon’s mouth are well hidden in the bottle.’</p>
-
- <p>‘When an earthquake occurs, and the bottle is shaken, the dragon
- instantly drops the ball, and the frog which receives it vibrates
- vigorously; any one watching this instrument can easily observe
- earthquakes.’</p>
-
- <p>With this arrangement, although one dragon may drop a ball, it is
- not necessary for the other seven dragons to drop their balls unless
- the movement has been in all directions; thus we can easily tell the
- direction of an earthquake.</p>
-
- <p>‘Once upon a time a dragon dropped its ball without any earthquake
- being observed, and the people therefore thought the instrument of
- no use, but after two or three days a notice came saying that an
- earthquake had taken place at Rōsei. Hearing of this, those who doubted
- the use of this instrument began to believe in it again. After this
- ingenious instrument had been invented by Chōko, the Chinese Government
- wisely appointed a secretary to make observations on earthquakes.’</p>
-
- <p>Not only is this instrument of interest on account of its antiquity,
- but it is also of interest on account of the close resemblance it bears
- to many of the instruments of modern times.</p>
-
- <p>Another earthquake instrument also of Eastern origin is the magnetic
- seismoscope of Japan.</p>
-
- <p>On the night of the destructive earthquake of 1855, which devastated
- a great portion of Tokio, the owner of a spectacle shop in Asakusa
- observed that a magnet dropped<span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">16</span>
- some old iron nails and keys which had
- been attached to it. From this occurrence the owner thought that the
- magnet had, in consequence of its age, lost its powers. About two hours
- afterwards, however, the great earthquake took place, after which the
- magnet was observed to have regained its powers. This occurrence led
- to the construction of the seismoscope, which is illustrated in a book
- called the ‘Ansei-Kembun-Roku,’ or a description of the earthquake of
- 1855, and examples of the instrument are still to be seen in Tokio.
- These instruments consist of a piece of magnetic iron ore, which holds
- up a piece of iron like a nail. This nail is connected, by means of a
- string, with a train of clockwork communicating with an alarm. If the
- nail falls a catch is released and the clockwork set in motion, and
- warning given by the ringing of a bell. It does not appear that this
- instrument has ever acted with success.</p>
-
- <p><em>Columns.</em>—One of the commonest forms of seismoscope, and one which
- has been very widely used, consists of a round column of wood, metal,
- or other suitable material, placed, with its axis vertical, on a level
- plane, and surrounded by some soft material such as loose sand to
- prevent it rolling should it be overturned. The fall of such a column
- indicates that a shaking or shock has taken place. Attempts have been
- made by using a number of columns of different sizes to make these
- indications seismometric, but they seldom give reliable information
- either as to intensity or direction of shock. The indications as to
- intensity are vitiated by the fact that a long-continued gentle shaking
- may overturn a column which would stand a very considerable sudden
- shock, while the directions in which a number of columns fall seldom
- agree owing to the rotational motion imparted to them by the shaking.
- Besides, the direction of motion<span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">17</span>
- of the earthquake seldom remains in
- the same azimuth throughout the whole disturbance.</p>
-
- <p>An extremely delicate, and at the same time simple form of seismoscope
- may be made by propping up strips of glass, pins, or other easily
- overturned bodies against suitably placed supports. In this way bodies
- may be arranged, which, although they can only fall in one direction,
- nevertheless fall with far less motion than is necessary to overturn
- any column which will stand without lateral support.</p>
-
- <p><em>Projection Seismometers.</em>—Closely related to the seismoscopes and
- seismometers which depend on the overturning of bodies. Mallet has
- described two sets of apparatus whose indications depend on the
- distance to which a body is projected. In one of these, which consisted
- of two similar parts arranged at right angles, two metal balls rest one
- on each side of a stop at the lower part of two inclined
- <img class="iglyph-a" src="images/i_p017.png" alt="" width="48" height="25" />
- like troughs. In this position each of the balls completes an electric
- circuit. By a shock the balls are projected or rolled up the troughs,
- and the height to which they rise is recorded by a corresponding
- interval in the break of the circuits. The vertical component of the
- motion is measured by the compression of a spring which carries the
- table on which this arrangement rests. In the second apparatus two
- balls are successively projected, one by the forward swing, and the
- other by the backward swing of the shock. Attached to them are loose
- wires forming terminals of the circuits. They are caught in a bed
- of wet sand in a metal trough forming the other end of the circuit.
- The throw of the balls as measured in the sand, and the difference
- of time between their successive projections as indicated by special
- contrivances connected with the closing of the circuits, enables
- the observer to calculate the direction of the wave of shock,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">18</span> its
- velocity, and other elements connected with the disturbance. It will be
- observed that the design of this apparatus assumes the earthquake to
- consist of a distinct isolated shock.</p>
-
- <p>Oldham, at the end of his account of the Cachar earthquake of 1869,
- recommends the use of an instrument based on similar principles. In his
- instrument four balls like bullets are placed in notches cut in the
- corners of the upper end of a square stake driven into the ground.</p>
-
- <p><em>Vessels filled with liquid.</em>—Another form of simple seismoscope is
- made by partially filling a vessel with liquid. The height to which the
- liquid is washed up the side of the vessel is taken as an indication of
- the intensity of the shock, and the line joining the points on which
- maximum motion is indicated, is taken as the direction of the shock. If
- earthquakes all lasted for the same length of time, and consisted of
- vibrations of the same period, such instruments might be of service.
- These instruments have, however, been in use from an early date. In
- 1742 we find that bowls of water were used to measure the earthquakes
- which in that year alarmed the inhabitants of Leghorn. About the same
- time the Rev. S. Chandler, writing about the shock at Lisbon, tells us
- that earthquakes may be measured by means of a spherical bowl about
- three or four feet in diameter, the inside of which, after being dusted
- over with Barber’s puff, is filled very gently with water. Mallet,
- Babbage, and De la Bêche have recommended the same sort of contrivance,
- but, notwithstanding, it has justly been criticised as ‘ridiculous and
- utterly impracticable.’<a id="FNanchor_7" href="#Footnote_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a></p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">19</span></p>
-
- <p>An important portion of Palmieri’s well-known instrument consists
- of horizontal tubes turned up at the ends and partially filled with
- mercury. To magnify the motion of the mercury, small floats of iron
- rest on its surface. These are attached by means of threads to a pulley
- provided with indices which move in front of a scale of degrees. We
- thus read off the intensity of an earthquake as so many degrees, which
- means so many millimetres of washing up and down of mercury in a tube.
- The direction of movement is determined by the azimuth of the tube
- which gives the maximum indication, several tubes being placed in
- different azimuths.</p>
-
- <p>This form of instrument appears to have been suggested by Mallet, who
- gives an account of the same in 1846. Inasmuch as the rise and fall
- of the mercury in such tubes depend on its depth and on the period
- of the earthquake together with its duration, we see that although
- the results obtained from a given instrument may give us means of
- making approximate comparisons as to the relative intensity of various
- earthquakes, it is very far from yielding any absolute measurement.</p>
-
- <p>Another method which has been employed to magnify and register the
- motions of liquid in a vessel has been to float upon its surface a
- raft or ship from which a tall mast projected. By a slight motion of
- the raft, the top of the mast vibrated through a considerable range.
- This motion of the mast as to direction and extent was then recorded by
- suitable contrivances attached to the top of the mast.</p>
-
- <p>A very simple form of liquid seismoscope consists of a circular trough
- of wood with notches cut round its side. This is filled with mercury
- to the level of the notches. At the time of an earthquake the maximum
- quantity of mercury runs over the notches in the direction of greatest
- motion. This instrument, which has long been used in Italy, is known as
- a Cacciatore, being named after its inventor. It is a prominent feature
- in the collection<span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">20</span>
- of apparatus forming the well-known seismograph of Palmieri.</p>
-
- <p><em>Pendulum instruments.</em>—Mallet speaks of pendulum seismoscopes and
- seismographs as ‘the oldest probably of seismometers long set up in
- Italy and southern Europe.’ In 1841 we find these being used to record
- the earthquake disturbances at Comrie in Scotland.</p>
-
- <p>These instruments may be divided into two classes: first, those which
- at the time of the shock are intended to swing, and thus record the
- direction of movement; and second, those which are supposed to remain
- at rest and thus provide ‘steady points.’</p>
-
- <p>To obtain an absolutely ‘steady point’ at the time of an earthquake,
- has been one of the chief aims of all recent seismological
- investigations.</p>
-
- <p>With a style or pointer projecting down from the steady point to
- a surface which is being moved backward and forward by the earth,
- such a surface has written upon it by its own motions a record of
- the ground to which it is attached. Conversely, a point projecting
- upwards from the moving earth might be caused to write a record on the
- body providing the steady point, which in the class of instruments
- now to be referred to is supposed to be the bob of a pendulum. It is
- not difficult to get a pendulum which will swing at the time of a
- moderately strong earthquake, but it is somewhat difficult to obtain
- one which will not swing at such a time. During the past few years,
- pendulums varying between forty feet in length and carrying bobs of
- eighty pounds in weight, and one-eighth of an inch in length, and
- carrying a gun-shot, have been experimented with under a great variety
- of circumstances. Sometimes the supports of these pendulums have been
- as rigid as it is possible to make a structure from brick and mortar,
- and at other times they have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">21</span>
- intentionally been made loose and
- flexible. The indices which wrote the motions of these pendulums have
- been as various as the pendulums themselves. A small needle sliding
- vertically through two small holes, and resting its lower end on a
- surface of smoked glass, has on account of its small amount of friction
- been perhaps one of the favourite forms of recording pointers.</p>
-
- <p>The free pendulums which have been employed, and which were intended
- to swing, have been used for two purposes: first, to determine the
- direction of motion from the direction of swing, and second, to see if
- an approximation to the period of the earth’s motion could be obtained
- by discovering the pendulum amongst a series of different lengths which
- was set in most violent motion, this probably being the one which had
- its natural period of swing the most nearly approximating to the period
- of the earthquake oscillations.</p>
-
- <p>Inasmuch as all pendulums when swinging have a tendency to change the
- plane of their oscillation, and also as we now know that the direction
- of motion during an earthquake is not always constant, the results
- usually obtained with these instruments respecting the direction of
- the earth’s motion have been unsatisfactory. The results which were
- obtained by series of pendulums of different lengths were, for various
- reasons, also unsatisfactory.</p>
-
- <p>Of pendulums intended to provide a steady point, from which the
- relative motion of a point on the earth’s surface could be recorded,
- there has been a great variety. One of the oldest forms consisted of
- a pendulum with a style projecting downwards from the bob so as to
- touch a bed of sand. Sometimes a concave surface was placed beneath the
- pendulum, on which the record was traced by means of a pencil. Probably
- the best form was that in which a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">22</span>
- needle, capable of sliding freely up
- and down, marked the relative horizontal motion of the earth and the
- pendulum bob on a smoked glass plate.</p>
-
- <p>It generally happens that at the time of a moderately severe earthquake
- the whole of these forms of apparatus are set in motion, due partly to
- the motion of the point of support of the pendulum, and partly to the
- friction of the writing point on the plate.</p>
-
- <p>Among these pendulums may be mentioned those of Cavallieri, Faura,
- Palmieri, Rossi, and numerous others. It is possible that the
- originators of some of these pendulums may have intended that
- they should record by swinging. If this is so, then so far as the
- determination of the actual nature of earthquake motion is concerned,
- they belong to a lower grade of apparatus than that in which they are
- here included.</p>
-
- <p>A great improvement in pendulum apparatus is due to Mr. Thomas Gray
- of Glasgow, who suggested applying so much frictional resistance to
- the free swing of a pendulum that for small displacements it became
- ‘dead beat.’ By carrying out this suggestion, pendulum instruments
- were raised to the position of seismographs. The manner of applying
- the friction will be understood from the following description of a
- pendulum instrument which is also provided with an index which gives a
- magnification of the motion of the earth.</p>
-
- <p><span class="smcap">b b b b</span> is a box 113 cm. high and 30 cm. by 18 cm. square.
- Inside this box a lead ring <span class="smcap">r</span>, 17 cm. in diameter and 3 cm.
- thick, is suspended as a pendulum from the screw <span class="smcap">s</span>. This screw
- passes through a small brass plate <span class="smcap">p p</span>, which can be moved
- horizontally over a hole in the top of the box. These motions in the
- point of suspension allow the pendulum to be adjusted.</p>
-
- <div class="figright">
- <img src="images/i_p023.jpg" width="300" height="539" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 2.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>Projecting over the top of the pendulum there is a
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">23</span> wooden arm
- <span class="smcap">w</span> carrying two sliding pointers <span class="smcap">h h</span>, resting
- on a glass plate placed on the top of the pendulum. These pointers are
- for the purpose of giving the frictional resistance before referred to.
- If this friction plate is smoked, the friction pointers will write upon
- it records of <em>large</em> earthquakes independently of the records given
- by the proper index, which only gives satisfactory records in the case
- of shocks of ordinary intensity. Crossing the inside of the pendulum
- <span class="smcap">r</span> there is a brass bar perforated with a small conical hole at
- <span class="smcap">m</span>. A stiff wire passes through <span class="smcap">m</span> and forms the upper
- portion of the index <span class="smcap">i</span>, the lower portion of which is a thin
- piece of bamboo. Fixed upon the wire there is a small brass ball which
- rests on the upper side of a second brass plate also perforated with a
- conical hole, which plate is fixed on the bar <span class="smcap">o o</span> crossing the
- box.</p>
-
- <p>If at the time of an earthquake the upper part of the index <span class="smcap">i</span>
- remains steady at <span class="smcap">m</span>, then by the motion at <span class="smcap">o</span>, the
- lower end of the index which carries a sliding needle at <span class="smcap">g</span>,
- will magnify the motion of the earth in the ratios <span class="smcap">m o</span> :
- <span class="smcap">o g</span>. In this instrument <span class="smcap">o g</span> is about 17 cm.</p>
-
- <p>The needle <span class="smcap">g</span> works upon a piece of smoked glass. In
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">24</span> order to
- bring the glass into contact with the needle without disturbance, the
- glass is carried on a strip of wood <span class="smcap">k</span>, hinged at the back of
- the box, and propped up in front by a loose block of wood <span class="smcap">y</span>.
- When <span class="smcap">y</span> is removed the glass drops down with <span class="smcap">k</span> out of
- contact with the needle. The box is carried on bars of wood
- <span class="smcap">c c</span>, which are fixed to the ground by the stakes <span class="smcap">a</span>
- <span class="smcap">a</span>.</p>
-
- <p>The great advantage of a pendulum seismograph working on a stationary
- plate is, that the record shows at once whether the direction of motion
- has been constant, or whether it has been variable. The maximum extent
- of motion in various directions is also easily obtained.</p>
-
- <p>The disadvantage of the instrument is, that at the time of a large
- earthquake, owing perhaps to a slight swing in the pendulum, the
- records may be unduly magnified.</p>
-
- <p>On such occasions, however, fairly good records may be obtained from
- the friction pointers, provided that the plates on which they work have
- been previously smoked. It might perhaps be well to use two of these
- instruments, one having a comparatively high frictional resistance, and
- hence ‘dead beat’ for large displacements.</p>
-
- <p>Many attempts have been made to use a pendulum seismograph in
- conjunction with a record-receiving surface, which at the time of the
- earthquake should be kept in motion by clockwork. In this way it was
- hoped to separate the various vibrations of the earthquake, and thus
- avoid the greater or less confusion which occurs when the index of the
- pendulum writes its backward and forward motion on a stationary plate.
- Hitherto all attempts in this direction, in which a single multiplying
- index was used, have been unsuccessful because of the moving plate
- dragging the index in the direction of its motion for a
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">25</span> short
- distance, and then allowing it to fall back towards its normal position.</p>
-
- <p>In connection with this subject we may mention the pendulum
- seismographs of Kreil, Wagener, Ewing, and Gray.</p>
-
- <p>In the bob of Kreil’s pendulum there was clockwork, which caused a disc
- on the axis of the pendulum to continuously rotate. On this continually
- revolving surface a style fixed to the earth traced an unbroken circle.
- At the time of an earthquake, by the motion of the style, the circle
- was to be broken and lines drawn. The number and length of these lines
- were to indicate the length and intensity of the disturbance.</p>
-
- <p>Gray’s pendulum consisted of a flat heavy disc carrying on its upper
- surface a smoked glass plate. This, which formed the bob of the
- pendulum, was supported by a pianoforte steel wire. When set ready to
- receive an earthquake, the wire was twisted and the bob held by a catch
- so arranged that at the time of the earthquake the catch was released,
- and the bob of the pendulum allowed to turn slowly by the untwisting of
- the supporting wire. Resting on the surface of this rotating disc were
- two multiplying indices arranged to write the earth’s motions as two
- components.</p>
-
- <p>In the instruments of Wagener and Ewing, the clockwork and moving
- surface do not form part of the pendulum, but rest independently on
- a support rigidly attached to the earth. In Wagener’s instrument one
- index only is used, while in Ewing’s two are used for writing the
- record of the motion.</p>
-
- <p>A difficulty which is apparent in all pendulum machines is that when
- the bob of such a pendulum is deflected it tends to fall back to its
- normal position. To make a pendulum perfect it therefore requires
- some compensating<span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">26</span>
- arrangement, so that the pendulum, for small
- displacements, shall be in neutral equilibrium, and the errors due to
- swinging shall be avoided.</p>
-
- <p>Several methods have been suggested for making the bob of an ordinary
- pendulum astatic for small displacements. One method proposed by Gray
- consists in fixing in the bob of a pendulum a circular trough of
- liquid, the curvature of this trough having a proper form. Another
- method which was suggested, was to attach a vertical spiral spring
- to a point in the axis of the pendulum a little below the point of
- suspension, and to a fixed point above it, so that when the pendulum is
- deflected it would introduce a couple.</p>
-
- <p>Professor Ewing has suggested an arrangement so that the bob of the
- pendulum shall be partly suspended by a stretched spiral spring, and at
- the same time shall be partly held up from below by a vertically placed
- strut, the weight carried by the strut being to the weight carried by
- the spring in the ratio of their respective lengths. As to how these
- arrangements will act when carried into practice yet remains to be seen.</p>
-
- <p>Another important class of instruments are <em>inverted pendulums</em>. These
- are vertical springs made of metal or wood loaded at their upper end
- with a heavy mass of metal. An arrangement of this sort, provided at
- its upper end with a pencil to write on a concave surface, was employed
- in 1841 to register the earthquakes at Comrie in Scotland. In Japan
- they were largely employed in series, each member of a series having
- a different period of vibration. The object of these arrangements
- was to determine which of the pendulums, with a given earthquake,
- recorded the greatest motion, it being assumed that the one which was
- thrown into the most violent oscillation would be the one most nearly
- approximating<span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">27</span>
- with the period of the earthquake. The result of these
- experiments showed that it was usually those with a slow period of
- vibration which were the most disturbed.</p>
-
- <p><em>Bracket Seismographs.</em>—A group of instruments of recent origin which
- have done good work, are the bracket seismographs. These instruments
- appear to have been independently invented by several investigators:
- the germ from which they originated probably being the well-known
- horizontal pendulum of Professor Zöllner. In Japan they were first
- employed by Professor W. S. Chaplin. Subsequently they were used by
- Professor Ewing and Mr. Gray. They consist essentially of a heavy
- weight supported at the extremity of a horizontal bracket which is free
- to turn on a vertical axis at its other end. When the frame carrying
- this axis is moved in any direction excepting parallel to the length
- of the gate-like bracket, the weight causes the bracket to turn round
- a line known as the instantaneous axis of the bracket corresponding to
- this motion of the fixed axis. Any point in this line may therefore be
- taken as a steady point for motions at right angles to the length of
- the supporting bracket. Two of these instruments placed at right angles
- to each other have to be employed in conjunction, and the motion of
- the ground is written down as two rectangular components. In Professor
- Ewing’s form of the instrument, light prolongations of the brackets
- form indices which give magnified representations of the motion, and
- the weights are pivoted round a vertical axis through their centre.</p>
-
- <p>In the accompanying sketch <span class="smcap">b</span> is a heavy weight pivoted at the
- end of a small bracket <span class="smcap">c a k</span>, which bracket is free to turn
- on a knife-edge, <span class="smcap">k</span>, above, and a pivot <span class="smcap">a</span>, below,
- in the stand <span class="smcap">s</span>. At the time of an earthquake <span class="smcap">b</span>
- remains steady, and the index <span class="smcap">p</span>, forming a continuation
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">28</span> of
- the bracket, magnifies the motion of the stand, in the ratio of
- <span class="smcap">a c</span> : <span class="smcap">c n</span>.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p028a.jpg" width="500" height="225" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 3.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>In an instrument called a double-bracket seismograph, invented by Mr.
- Gray, we have two brackets hinged to each other, and one of them to a
- fixed frame. The planes of the two brackets are placed at right angles,
- so as to give to a heavy mass supported at the end of the outer bracket
- two degrees of horizontal freedom.</p>
-
- <p>In all bracket machines, especially those which carry a pivoted weight,
- it is doubtful whether the weight provides a truly steady point
- relatively to the plate on which the record is written for motion
- parallel to the direction of the arm.</p>
-
- <div class="figleft">
- <img src="images/i_p028b.jpg" width="266" height="175" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 4.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p><em>Parallel motion Instrument.</em>—A machine which writes its record as
- two components, and which promises great stability,
- is one suggested
- by Professor C. D. West. Like the bracket machines it consists of two
- similar parts placed at right angles to each other, and is as follows:
- A bar of iron <span class="smcap">a</span> is suspended from both sides on pivots at
- <span class="smcap">c c</span> by a system of light arms hinging with each other at
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">29</span> the
- black dots, between the upper and lower parts of the rigid frame
- <span class="smcap">b c</span>. The arms are of such a length that for small displacements
- parallel to the length of the bar, <span class="smcap">c c</span> practically move
- in a straight line, and the bar is in neutral equilibrium. A light
- prolongation of the bar <i>d</i> works the upper end of the light index <i>e</i>,
- passing as a universal joint through the rigid support <span class="smcap">f</span>. A
- second index <i>e′</i> from the bar at right angles also passes through
- <span class="smcap">f</span>. The multiplying ends of these indices are coupled together
- to write a resultant motion on a smoked glass plate <span class="smcap">s</span>.</p>
-
- <p><em>Conical Pendulums.</em>—Another group of instruments which have also
- yielded valuable records are the conical pendulum seismographs. The
- idea of using the bob of a conical pendulum to give a steady point in
- an earthquake machine was first suggested and carried into practice by
- Mr. Gray. The seismograph as employed consists of a pair of conical
- pendulums hung in planes at right angles to each other. The bob of each
- of these pendulums is fixed a short distance from the end of a light
- lever, which forms the writing index, the short end resting as a strut
- against the side of a post fixed in the earth. The weight is carried by
- a thin wire or thread, the upper end of which is attached to a point
- vertically above the fixed end of the lever.</p>
-
- <p><em>Rolling Spheres and Cylinders.</em>—After the conical pendulum
- seismographs, which claim several important advantages over the bracket
- machines, we come to a group of instruments known as rolling sphere
- seismographs. Here, again, we have a class of instruments for the
- various forms of which we are indebted to the ingenuity of Mr. Gray.</p>
-
- <p>The general arrangement and principle of one of these instruments will
- be readily understood from the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">30</span>
- accompanying figure. <span class="smcap">s</span> is a
- segment of a large sphere with a centre near <span class="smcap">c</span>. Slightly below
- this centre a heavy weight <span class="smcap">b</span>, which may be a lead ring, is
- pivoted. At the time of an earthquake <span class="smcap">c</span> is steady, and the
- earth’s motions are magnified by the pointer <span class="smcap">c a n</span> in the
- proportion of <span class="smcap">c a</span> : <span class="smcap">a n</span>. The working of this pointer
- or index is similar to that of the pointer in the pendulum.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p030.jpg" width="400" height="356" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 5.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>Closely connected with the rolling sphere seismographs, are Gray’s
- rolling cylinder seismographs.</p>
-
- <p>These are two cylinders resting on a surface plate with their axes at
- right angles to each other. Near to the highest point in each of these
- cylinders, this point remaining nearly steady when the surface plate
- is moved backwards and forwards, there is attached the end of a light
- index. These indices are again pivoted a short distance from their ends
- on axes connected with the surface plate. In order that the two indices
- may be brought parallel, one is cranked at the second pivot.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">31</span></p>
-
- <p><em>Ball and Plate Seismograph.</em>—Another form of seismograph, which is
- closely related to the two forms of apparatus just described, is
- Verbeck’s ball and plate seismograph. This consists of a surface plate
- resting on three hard spheres, which in turn rests upon a second
- surface plate. When the lower plate is moved, the upper one tends to
- remain at rest, and thus may be used as a steady mass to move an index.</p>
-
- <p><em>The Principle of Perry and Ayrton.</em>—An instrument which is of interest
- from the scientific principle it involves is a seismograph suggested
- by Professors Perry and Ayrton, who propose to support a heavy ball on
- three springs, which shall be sufficiently stiff to have an exceedingly
- quick period of vibration. By means of pencils attached to the ball by
- levers, the motions of the ball are to be recorded on a moving band of
- paper. The result would be a record compounded of the small vibrations
- of the springs superimposed on the larger, slower, wave-like motions
- of the earthquake, and, knowing the former of these, the latter might
- be separated by analysis. Although our present knowledge of earthquake
- motion indicates that the analysis of such a record would often present
- us with insuperable difficulties, this instrument is worthy of notice
- on account of the novelty of the principle it involves, which, the
- authors truly remark, has in seismometry been a ‘neglected’ one.</p>
-
- <p><em>Instruments to record Vertical Motion.</em>—The instruments which have
- been devised to record vertical motion are almost as numerous as those
- which have been devised to record horizontal motion. The earliest
- form of instrument employed for this purpose was a spiral spring
- stretched by weight, which, on account of its inertia, was supposed
- at the time of a shock to remain steady. No satisfactory results have
- ever been obtained<span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">32</span>
- from such instruments, chiefly on account of the
- inconvenience in making a spring sufficiently long to allow of enough
- elongation to give a long period of vibration. Similar remarks may
- be applied to the horizontally placed elastic rods, one end of which
- is fixed to a wall, whilst the opposite end is loaded with a weight.
- Such contrivances, furnished with pencil on the weight to write a
- record upon a vertical surface, were used in 1842 at Comrie, and we
- see the same principle applied in a portion of Palmieri’s apparatus.
- Contrivances like these neither give us the true amplitude of the
- vertical motion, insomuch as they are readily set in a state of
- oscillation; nor do they indicate the duration of a disturbance, for,
- being once set in motion, they continue that motion in virtue of their
- inertia long after the actual earthquake has ceased. They can only be
- regarded as seismoscopes.</p>
-
- <div class="figleft">
- <img src="images/i_p032.jpg" width="280" height="496" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 6.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>The most satisfactory instrument which has yet been devised for
- recording vertical motion is Gray’s horizontal lever spring seismograph.</p>
-
- <p>This instrument will be better understood from the accompanying sketch.
- A vertical spring <span class="smcap">s</span> is fixed at its upper end by means of a
- nut <i>n</i>, which rests on the top of the frame <span class="smcap">f</span>, and serves to
- raise or lower the spring through a short distance as a last adjustment
- for<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">33</span>
- the position of the cross-arm <span class="smcap">a</span>. The arm <span class="smcap">a</span> rests
- at one end on two sharp points, <i>p</i>, one resting in a conical hole
- and the other in a <span class="smcap">v</span>-slot; it is supported at <span class="smcap">b</span> by
- the spring <span class="smcap">s</span>, and is weighted at <span class="smcap">c</span> with a lead ring
- <span class="smcap">r</span>. Over a pin at the point <span class="smcap">c</span> a stirrup of thread is
- placed which supports a small trough, <i>t</i>. The trough <i>t</i> is pivoted at
- <i>a</i>, has attached to it the index <i>i</i> (which is hinged by means of a
- strip of tough paper at <i>h</i>, and rests through a fine pin on the glass
- plate <i>g</i>), and is partly filled with mercury.</p>
-
- <p>Another method of obtaining a steady point for vertical motion is that
- of Dr. Wagener, who employs a buoy partly immersed in a vessel of
- water. This was considerably improved upon by Mr. Gray, who suggested
- the use of a buoy, which, with the exception of a long thin style, was
- completely sunk.</p>
-
- <p>Among the other forms of apparatus used to record vertical motion may
- be mentioned vessels provided with india-rubber or other flexible
- bottoms, and partially filled with water or some other liquid. As the
- vessel is moved up and down, the bottom tends to remain behind and
- provides a more or less steady point. Pivoted to this is a light index,
- which is again pivoted to a rigid frame in connection with the earth.
- Instruments of this description have yielded good records.</p>
-
- <p><em>Record Receivers.</em>—A large number of earthquake machines having been
- referred to, it now remains to consider the apparatus on which they
- write their motions. The earlier forms of seismographs, as has already
- been indicated, recorded their movements in a bed of sand; others
- wrote their records by means of pencils on sheets of paper. Where we
- have seismographs which magnify the motion of the earth, it will be
- observed that methods like the above would involve great frictional
- resistances,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">34</span>
- tending to cause motion in the assumed steady points of
- the seismographs. One of the most perfect instruments would be obtained
- by registering photographically the motions of the recording index by
- the reflection of a ray of light. Such an instrument would, however,
- be difficult to construct and difficult to manipulate. One of the best
- practical forms of registering apparatus is one in which the record is
- written on a surface of smoked glass. This can afterwards be covered
- with a coat of photographer’s varnish, and subsequently photographed by
- the ‘blue process’ so well known to engineers.</p>
-
- <p>To obtain a record of all the vibrations of an earthquake it is
- necessary that the surface on which the seismograph writes should at
- the time of an earthquake be in motion. Of record-receiving machines
- there are three types. First, there are those which move continuously.
- The common form of these is a circular glass plate like an old form of
- chronograph, driven continuously by clockwork. On this the pointers of
- the seismograph rest and trace over and over again the same circles.
- At the time of an earthquake they move back and forth across the
- circles, which are theoretically fine lines, and leave a record of
- the earthquake. Instead of a circular plate, a drum covered with
- smoked paper may be used, which, after the earthquake, possesses the
- advantage, after unrolling, of presenting the record in a straight
- line, instead of a record written round the periphery of a circle, as
- is the case with the circular glass plates. Such records are easily
- preserved, but they are more difficult to photograph.</p>
-
- <p>The second form of apparatus is one which is set in motion at the
- time of a shock. This may be a contrivance like one of those just
- described, or a straight smoked glass plate on a carriage. By means
- of an electrical<span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">35</span>
- or a mechanical contrivance called a ‘starter,’ of
- which many forms have been contrived, the earthquake is caused to
- release a detent and thus set in motion the mechanism which moves the
- record receiver.</p>
-
- <p>The great advantage of continuously-moving machines is that the
- beginning and end of the shock can usually be got with certainty, while
- all the uncertainty as to the action of the ‘starter’ is avoided.
- Self-starting machines have, of course, the advantage of simplicity and
- cheapness, while there is no danger of the record getting obliterated
- by the subsequent motion of the plate under the index.</p>
-
- <p><em>Time-recording Apparatus.</em>—Of equal importance with the instruments
- which record the motion of the ground, are those instruments which
- record the time at which such motion took place. The great value of
- time records, when determining the origin from which an earthquake
- originates, will be shown farther on. The most important result which
- is required in connection with time observations, is to determine
- the interval of time taken by a disturbance in travelling from one
- point to another. On account of the great velocity with which these
- disturbances sometimes travel, it is necessary that these observations
- should be made with considerable accuracy. The old methods of adapting
- an apparatus to a clock which, when shaken, shall cause the clock to
- stop, are of little value unless the stations at which the observations
- are made are at considerable distances apart. This will be appreciated
- when we remember that the disturbance may possibly travel at the rate
- of a mile per second, that its duration at any station may often extend
- over a minute, and that one set of apparatus at one station may stop,
- perhaps, at the commencement of the disturbance, and the other near
- the end. A satisfactory time-taking<span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">36</span>
- apparatus will therefore require,
- not only the means for stopping a clock, but also a contrivance which,
- at the same instant that the clock is stopped, shall make a mark on a
- record which is being drawn by a seismograph. In this way we find out
- at which portion of the shock the time was taken.</p>
-
- <div class="figleft">
- <img src="images/i_p036.jpg" width="270" height="357" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 7.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>Palmieri stops a clock in his seismograph by closing an electric
- circuit. Mallet proposes to stop a clock by the falling of a column
- which is attached by a string to the pendulum of the clock. So long as
- the column is standing the string is loose and the pendulum is free
- to move; but when the column falls, the string is tightened and the
- pendulum is arrested. The difficulty which arises is to obtain a column
- that will fall with a slight disturbance. The best form of contrivance
- for causing a column to fall, and one which may also be used in drawing
- out a catch to relieve the machinery of a record receiver, is shown in
- the accompanying sketch.</p>
-
- <p><span class="smcap">s</span> is the segment of a sphere about 4·5 cm. radius, with a
- centre slightly above <span class="smcap">c</span>. <span class="smcap">l</span> is a disc of lead about 7
- cm. in diameter resting upon the segment. Above this there is a light
- pointer, <span class="smcap">p</span>, about 30 cm. long. On the top of the pointer a
- small cylinder of iron, <span class="smcap">w</span>, is balanced, and connected by a
- string with the catch to be relieved. When the table on which <span class="smcap">w p s</span>
- rests is shaken, rotation takes place near to <span class="smcap">c</span>, the
- motion of the base <span class="smcap">s</span> is magnified at the upper end of the
- pointer, and the weight overturned. This catch may be used to relieve
- a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">37</span>
- toothed bar axled at one end, and held up above a pin projecting
- from the face of the pendulum bob. When this falls it catches the
- projecting pin and holds the pendulum.</p>
-
- <p>Another way of relieving the toothed bar is to hold up the opposite
- end to that at which it is axled by resting it on the extremity of a
- horizontal wire fixed to the bob of a conical pendulum—for example, one
- of the indices of a conical pendulum seismograph. The whole of this
- apparatus, which may be constructed at the cost of a few pence, can be
- made small enough to go inside an ordinary clock case.</p>
-
- <p>The difficulty which arises with all these clock-stopping arrangements
- is that it is difficult for observers situated at distant stations
- to re-start their clocks so that their difference in time shall
- be accurately known. Even if each observer is provided with a
- well-regulated chronometer, with which he can make comparisons, the
- rating of these instruments is for all ordinary persons an extremely
- troublesome operation.</p>
-
- <p>In order to avoid this difficulty the author has of late years used a
- method of obtaining the time without stopping the clock. To do this a
- clock with a central seconds hand is taken, and the hour and minute
- hands are prolonged and bent out slightly at their extremities at right
- angles to the face, the hour hand being slightly the longest. Each
- hand is then tipped with a piece of soft material like cork, which is
- smeared with a glycerine ink. A light flat ring, with divisions in it
- corresponding to those on the face of the clock, is so arranged that
- at the time of a shock it can be quickly advanced to touch the inked
- pads on the hands of the clock and then withdrawn. This is accomplished
- by suitable machinery, which is relieved either by an electro-magnet
- or some other<span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">38</span>
- contrivance which will withdraw a catch. In this way an
- impression in the form of three dots is received on the disc, and the
- time known without either stopping or sensibly retarding the clock.</p>
-
- <p>For ordinary observers, if a time-taker is not used in conjunction
- with a record receiver, as good results as those obtained by ordinary
- clock-stopping apparatus are obtainable by glancing at an ordinary
- watch. Subsequently the watch by which the observation was made should
- be compared with some good time-keeper, and the local time at which the
- shock took place is then approximately known.</p>
-
- <p>From what has now been said it will be seen that for a complete
- seismograph we require three distinct sets of apparatus—an apparatus to
- record horizontal motion, an apparatus to record vertical motion, and
- an apparatus to record time. The horizontal and vertical motions must
- be written on the same receiver, and if possible side by side, whilst
- the instant at which the time record is made a mark must be made on
- the edge of the diagram which is being drawn by the seismograph. Such
- a seismograph has been constructed and is now erected in Japan. It is
- illustrated in the accompanying diagram.</p>
-
- <p><em>The Gray and Milne Seismograph.</em>—In this apparatus two mutually
- rectangular components of the horizontal motion of the earth are
- recorded on a sheet of smoked paper wound round a drum, <span class="smcap">d</span>,
- kept continuously in motion by clockwork, <span class="smcap">w</span>, by means of two
- conical pendulum seismographs, <span class="smcap">c</span>. The vertical motion is
- recorded on the same sheet of paper by means of a compensated-spring
- seismograph, <span class="smcap">s l m b</span>.</p>
-
- <p>The time of occurrence of an earthquake is determined by causing the
- circuit of two electro-magnets to be closed by the shaking. One of
- these magnets relieves a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">39</span>
- mechanism, forming part of a time-keeper, which causes the dial of the
- timepiece to come suddenly forwards on the hands and then move back
- to its original position. The hands are provided with ink-pads, which
- mark their positions on the dial, thus indicating the hour, minute, and
- second when the circuit was closed. The second
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_40">40</span> electro-magnet causes a
- pointer to make a mark on the paper receiving the record of the motion.
- This mark indicates the part of the earthquake at which the circuit was
- closed.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p039.jpg" width="625" height="699" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 8.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>The duration of the earthquake is estimated from the length of the
- record on the smoked paper and the rate of motion of the drum. The
- nature and period of the different movements are obtained from the
- curves drawn on the paper.</p>
-
- <p>Mr. Gray has since greatly modified this apparatus, notably by the
- introduction of a band of paper sufficiently long to take a record for
- twenty-four hours without repetition. The record is written in ink by
- means of fine siphons. In this way the instrument, which is extremely
- sensitive to change of level, can be made to show not only earthquakes,
- but the pulsations of long period which have recently occupied so much
- attention.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_III">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_41">41</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER III.<br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTHQUAKE MOTION DISCUSSED THEORETICALLY.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Ideas of the ancients (the views of Travagini, Hooke, Woodward,
- Stukeley, Mitchell, Young, Mallet)—Nature of elastic waves
- and vibrations—Possible causes of disturbance in the Earth’s
- crust—The time of vibration of an earth particle—Velocity and
- acceleration of a particle—Propagation of a disturbance as
- determined by experiments upon the elastic moduli of rocks—The
- intensity of an earthquake—Area of greatest overturning
- moment—Earthquake waves—Reflexion, refraction, and interference
- of waves—Radiation of a disturbance.</div>
-
- <p><em>Ideas of Early Writers.</em>—One of the first accounts of the varieties of
- motion which may be experienced at the time of an earthquake is to be
- found in the classification of earthquakes given by
- Aristotle.<a id="FNanchor_8" href="#Footnote_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a>
- It is as follows:—</p>
-
- <p>1. Epiclintæ, or earthquakes which move the ground obliquely.</p>
-
- <p>2. Brastæ, with an upward vertical motion like boiling water.</p>
-
- <p>3. Chasmatiæ, which cause the ground to sink and form hollows.</p>
-
- <p>4. Rhectæ, which raise the ground and make fissures.</p>
-
- <p>5. Ostæ, which overthrow with one thrust.</p>
-
- <p>6. Palmatiæ, which shake from side to side with a sort of tremor.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">42</span></p>
-
- <p>From the sixth group in this classification we see that this early
- writer did not regard earthquakes as necessarily isolated events, but
- that some of them consisted of a succession of backward and forward
- vibratory motions. He also distinguishes between the total duration of
- an earthquake and the length of, and intervals between, a series of
- shocks. Aristotle had, in fact, some idea of what modern writers upon
- ordinary earthquakes would term ‘modality.’</p>
-
- <p>The earliest writer who had the idea that an earthquake was a
- pulse-like motion propagated through solid ground appears to have been
- Francisci Travagini, who, in 1679, wrote upon an earthquake which
- in 1667 had overthrown Ragusa. The method in which the pulses were
- propagated he illustrated by experiments.</p>
-
- <p>Hooke, who, in 1690, delivered discourses on earthquakes before the
- Royal Society, divides these phenomena according to the geological
- effects they have produced; thus there is a <em>genus</em> producing
- elevations, a <em>genus</em> producing sinkings, a <em>genus</em> producing
- conversions and transportations, and a <em>genus</em> which produces what, in
- modern language, we should term metamorphic action.</p>
-
- <p>Woodward, in his ‘Natural History,’ written in 1695, speaks of
- earthquakes as being agitations and concussions produced by water in
- the interior of the earth coming in contact with internal fires.</p>
-
- <p>Stukeley observed that an earthquake was ‘a tremor of the earth,’ to
- be explained as a vibration in a solid. The Rev. John Mitchell, writing
- in 1760, says that the motion of the earth in earthquakes is partly
- tremulous and partly propagated by waves.</p>
-
- <p>From these few examples, to which might be added many more, it will
- be seen that an earthquake disturbance has usually been regarded as
- a concussion, vibration, trembling, or undulatory movement. Further,
- it can be<span class="pagenum" id="Page_43">43</span>
- seen in narratives of earthquakes that it had been often
- observed that these tremblings and shakings continued over a certain
- period of time. Although it had been noticed that large areas were
- almost simultaneously affected by these disturbances, no definite idea
- appears to have existed as to how earthquake motion was propagated.
- Usually it was assumed that the disturbance spread through subterranean
- channels.</p>
-
- <p>The first true conception of earthquake motion and the manner of its
- propagation is due to Dr. Thomas Young, who suggested that earthquake
- motion was vibratory, and it might be ‘propagated through the earth
- nearly in the same manner as a noise is conveyed through the air.’ The
- same idea was moulded into a more definite form by Gay Lussac.</p>
-
- <p>The first accurate definition of an earthquake is due to Mr. Robert
- Mallet, who, after collecting and examining many facts connected with
- earthquake phenomena, and reasoning on these, with the help of known
- laws connected with the production and propagation of waves of various
- descriptions, formulated his views as follows:—</p>
-
- <p>An earthquake is ‘<em>the transit of a wave or waves of elastic
- compression in any direction from vertically upwards to horizontally,
- in any azimuth, through the crust and surface of the earth, from any
- centre of impulse or from more than one, and which may be attended
- with sound and tidal waves, dependent upon the impulse and upon
- circumstances of position as to sea and land</em>.’</p>
-
- <p>In brief, so far as motion in the earth is concerned. Mallet defined
- an earthquake as being a motion due to the transit of waves of elastic
- compression. In many cases it is possible that this is strictly true,
- but in succeeding pages it will be shown that earthquake motion may
- also be due to the transit of waves of elastic distortion.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_44">44</span></p>
-
- <p>To obtain a true idea of earthquake motion is a matter of cardinal
- importance, as it forms the key-stone of many investigations.</p>
-
- <p>If we know the nature of the motion produced by an earthquake, we are
- aided in tracking it to its origin, and in reasoning as to how it was
- produced. If our knowledge of the nature of the motion of an earthquake
- is incorrect, it will be impossible for us intelligently to construct
- buildings to withstand the effects of these disturbances. We have thus
- to consider, in this portion of seismology, a point of great scientific
- importance, and shall deal with it at some length.</p>
-
- <p><em>Nature of Elastic Waves and Vibrations.</em>—When it is stated that an
- earthquake consists of elastic waves of compression and distortion, the
- student of physics has a clear idea of what is meant and a knowledge
- of the mechanical laws which govern such disturbances. The ordinary
- reader, however, and the majority of the inhabitants of earthquake
- countries, who of all people have the greatest interest in this matter,
- may not have so clear a conception, and it will, therefore, not be out
- of place to give some general explanation on this point.</p>
-
- <p>The ordinary idea of a wave is that it is a disturbance similar to
- that which we often see in water. Waves like these must not, however,
- be confounded with elastic waves. A disturbance produced in water,
- say, for instance, by dropping a stone into a pond, is propagated
- outwards by the action of gravity. First, a ridge of water is raised
- up by the stone passing beneath the surface. As this ridge falls
- towards its normal position in virtue of its weight, it raises a second
- ridge. This second ridge raises a third ridge, and so on. The water
- moves vertically up and down, whilst the wave itself is propagated
- horizontally.</p>
-
- <p>To understand what is meant by elastic waves, it is
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">45</span> first necessary
- to understand what is meant by the term elastic. In popular language
- the term elastic is confined to substances like india-rubber, and but
- seldom to rock-like materials, through which earthquake waves are
- propagated. India-rubber is called elastic because after we remove a
- compressive force it has a tendency to spring back to its original
- shape. The elastic force of the india-rubber is in this case the force
- which causes it to resist a change of form. Now, a piece of rock may,
- up to a certain point, like the india-rubber, be compressed, and when
- the compressing force is removed it will also tend to resume its
- original form. However, as the rock offers more resistance to the
- compressing force than the india-rubber offers, we say that it is the
- more elastic. It may be here observed that a substance like granite
- offers great resistance, not only to compression or a change of volume,
- but also to a change of form or shape; whereas a substance like air,
- which is also elastic, only offers resistance to compression, but not
- to a change of shape.</p>
-
- <p>With these ideas before us we will now proceed to consider how, after
- a body has been suddenly compressed or distorted, this disturbance
- is propagated through the mass. For the elastic body let us take a
- long spiral spring hung from the ceiling of a room and kept slightly
- stretched by a weight. If we give this weight an upward tap from below,
- say with a hammer, we shall observe a pulse-like wave which runs up the
- spring until it reaches the ceiling of the room. Here it will, so to
- speak, rebound, like a billiard ball from the end of a table, and run
- towards the weight from which it started. Whilst this is going on we
- may also observe that the weight is moving up and down.</p>
-
- <p>Here, then, we have two distinct things to observe—one being the
- transmission of motion up to the ceiling,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">46</span> which we may liken to the
- transmission of an earthquake wave between two distant localities on
- the earth’s surface, and the other being the up and down motion of our
- weight, which we may compare to the backward and forward swinging which
- we experience at the time of an earthquake.</p>
-
- <p>These two motions—namely, the pulse-like wave produced by the
- transmission of motion, and the backward and forward oscillation of the
- weight or of any point on the spring—must be carefully distinguished
- from each other.</p>
-
- <p>First, we will consider the backward and forward motion of the weight.
- The distance through which the weight moves depends upon the force
- of the blow. The number of up and down oscillations it makes, say
- in a second, depends upon the stiffness of the spring. The weight,
- supposing it to be always the same, will move more quickly at the end
- of a stiff spring than at the end of a flaccid one; that is to say, its
- velocity is quicker. As in any given spring the number of up and down
- oscillations are always the same in a given interval of time, if these
- oscillations are of great extent, the weight must move more quickly
- with large than with small oscillations.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of an earthquake the manner in which we are moved backward
- and forward is very similar to the manner in which the weight is moved.
- If we stand on a hard rock-like granite, we are to a great extent
- placed as if we were attached to a stiff quickly-vibrating spring.
- If, however, we are on a soft rock, it is more like being on a loose
- flaccid spring.</p>
-
- <p>All that has thus far been considered has been a backward and forward
- kind of motion, where there is a rectilinear <em>compression</em> and
- <em>extension</em> amongst the particles on which we stand.</p>
-
- <p>We might, however, imagine our rock, which for the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_47">47</span> moment we will
- consider to be a square column, to be twisted, and thus have its
- <em>shape</em> altered. When the twisting force is taken off it seems evident
- that the column would endeavour to untwist itself or regain its
- original form. Now the force which a body offers against a change of
- <em>volume</em> may be very different from that which it offers against a
- change of <em>form</em>.</p>
-
- <p>In disturbances which take place in the rocky crust of our earth,
- it would seem possible that we may have vibrations set up which are
- either compressions and extensions or twistings and distortions. These
- may take place separately or simultaneously, or we may have resultant
- motions due to their combination.</p>
-
- <p>The following are examples of possible causes which might give rise to
- these different orders of disturbance:—</p>
-
- <p>1. Imagine a large area stretched by elevation until it reaches the
- limit of its elasticity and cracks. After cracking, in consequence
- of its elasticity, it will fly back over the whole area like a
- broken spring, and each point in the area will oscillate round its
- new position of equilibrium. In this case there will be no waves
- of distortion excepting near the end of the crack, where waves are
- transmitted in a direction parallel to the fissure.</p>
-
- <p>2. The ground is broken and slips either up, down, or sideways, as
- we see to have taken place in the production of faults. Here we get
- distortion in the direction of the movement, and waves are produced
- by the elastic force of the rock, causing it to spring back from its
- distorted form. In a case like this the production of a fissure running
- north and south might give rise to north and south vibrations, which
- would be propagated end on towards the north and south, but broadside
- on towards the east and west. With disturbances of this kind, on
- account of the want of homogeneousness in the materials
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">48</span> in which
- they are produced, we should expect to find waves of compression and
- extension.</p>
-
- <p>3. A truly spherical cavity is suddenly formed by the explosion of
- steam in the midst of an elastic medium. In this case all the waves
- will be those of compression, each particle moving backward and forward
- along a radius.</p>
-
- <p>Should the cavity, instead of being truly spherical, be irregular, it
- is evident that, in addition to the normal vibration of compression,
- transverse waves of distortion will be more or less pronounced,
- depending upon the nature of the cavity.</p>
-
- <p>The combination of these two sets of vibrations may cause a point in
- the earth to move in a circle, an ellipse, the form of a figure eight,
- and in other curves similar to these, which are produced by apparatus
- designed to show the combination of harmonic motion. From these
- examples it will be seen that we have therefore to consider two kinds
- of vibrations—one produced by compression or the alteration of volume,
- and the other produced by an alteration in shape.</p>
-
- <p>Now the resistance which a body offers, either to a change in its
- volume or in its shape, is called its elasticity, and the law which
- governs the backward and forward motion of a particle under the
- influence of this elasticity may be expressed as follows:</p>
-
- <p>If <span class="smcap">t</span> be the time of vibration, or the time taken by a particle
- to make one complete backward and forward swing, <span class="smcap">d</span> the density
- of the material of which this particle forms a part, and <span class="smcap">e</span> the
- proper modulus of elasticity of the material, then,</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- <span class="smcap">t</span>&nbsp;=&nbsp;2π&nbsp;<span class="x200a">√</span><span class="sqrt2"><span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">d</span></sup><span>/</span><sub><span class="smcap">e</span></sub></span></span>
- </div>
-
- <p>From this formula,
- <span class="smcap">t</span>&nbsp;=&nbsp;2π&nbsp;<span class="x200a">√</span><span class="sqrt2"><span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">d</span></sup><span>/</span><sub><span class="smcap">e</span></sub></span></span>,
- we see that the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_49">49</span>
- time of vibration of the earth during an earthquake,
- or the rate at which we are shaken backwards and forwards, varies
- directly as the square root of the density of the material on which we
- stand, and inversely as the square root of a number proportional to its
- elasticity.</p>
-
- <p><em>Velocity and Acceleration of an Earth Particle.</em>—Another important
- point, which the practical seismologist has often brought to
- his notice, is the question of the velocity with which an earth
- particle moves. According to the formula,
- <span class="smcap">t</span>&nbsp;=&nbsp;2π&nbsp;<span class="x200a">√</span><span class="sqrt2"><span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">d</span></sup><span>/</span><sub><span class="smcap">e</span></sub></span></span>,
- we should expect that a particle would
- make each semi-vibration in an equal time, and from a knowledge of the
- density and elastic moduli of a body this time might be calculated.
- Although the time of a semi-oscillation may be constant, we must bear
- in mind that, like the bob of a pendulum during each of its swings, the
- particle starts from rest, increases in velocity until it reaches the
- middle portion of its half swing, from which it gradually decreases in
- speed until it reaches zero, when it again commences a similar motion
- in the opposite direction.</p>
-
- <p>These pendulum-like vibrations are sometimes spoken of as simple
- harmonic motions. If we know the distance through which an earthquake
- moves in making a single swing, and the time taken in making this
- swing, on the assumption that the motion is simple harmonic we can
- easily calculate the maximum velocity with which the particle moves.</p>
-
- <p>Thus, if an earth particle takes one second to complete a
- semi-oscillation, half of which, or the amplitude of the motion, equals
- <i>a</i>, the maximum velocity equals <i>π</i> × <i>a</i>.</p>
-
- <p>Again, assuming the earth vibrations to be simple harmonic, the maximum
- acceleration or rate of change in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_50">50</span>
- velocity will come about at the ends
- of each semi-oscillation; and if <span class="smcap">v</span> be the maximum velocity of
- the particle, and <i>a</i> the amplitude or half semi-oscillation, then the
- maximum acceleration equals
- <span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">v</span><sup>2</sup></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>a</i></sub></span>.</p>
-
- <p>Later on it will be shown, as the result of experiment, that certain of
- the more important earth oscillations in an earthquake are not simple
- harmonic motion. Nevertheless the above remarks will be of assistance
- in showing how the velocity and other elements connected with the
- motion of an earth particle, which are required by the practical
- seismologist, may be calculated, irrespective of assumptions as to the
- nature of the motion.</p>
-
- <p><em>Propagation of a Disturbance.</em>—We may next consider the manner in
- which a disturbance, in which there are both vibrations of compression
- and of distortion, is propagated. The first or normal set of vibrations
- are propagated in a manner similar to that in which sound vibrations
- are propagated. From a centre of disturbance these movements approach
- an observer at a distant station, so to speak, end on. The other
- vibrations have a direction of motion similar to that which we believe
- to exist in a ray of light. These would approach the observer broadside
- on.</p>
-
- <p>If the disturbance passed through a formation like a series of
- perfectly laminated slates, each of these two sets of vibration might
- be subdivided, and we should then obtain what Mallet has termed
- ordinary and extraordinary normal and transverse vibrations.</p>
-
- <p>In consequence of the difference in the elastic forces on which the
- propagation of these two kinds of vibration depends, the normal
- vibrations are transmitted faster than the transversal ones—that is
- to say, if an earthquake originated from a blow, the first thing that
- would be<span class="pagenum" id="Page_51">51</span>
- felt at a point distant from the origin of the shock would be
- a backward and forward motion in the direction to and from the origin,
- and then, a short interval afterwards, a motion transversal, or at
- right angles to this, would be experienced.</p>
-
- <p>From the mathematical theory of vibratory motions it is possible to
- calculate the velocity with which a disturbance is propagated. As the
- result of these investigations it has been shown that normal vibrations
- travel more quickly than transverse vibrations.</p>
-
- <p>Deductions from experiments on small specimens are, however,
- invalidated by the fact that the specimens used for experiments are,
- of course, nearly homogeneous, whilst the earthquake passes through
- a mass which is heterogeneous and more or less fissured. Mallet, by
- experiments ‘on the compressibility of solid cubes of these rocks,
- obtained the mean modulus of elasticity,’ with the result that ‘nearly
- seven-eighths of the full velocity of wave-transit due to the material,
- if solid and continuous, is lost by reason of the heterogeneity and
- discontinuity of the rocky masses as they are found piled together in
- nature.’ The full velocities of wave-transit, as calculated by Mallet
- from a theorem given by Poisson, were—</p>
-
- <blockquote>
- <p class="noindent">
- For slate and quartz transverse to lamination, 9,691 feet per second.<br />
- &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
- &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;in line of lamination,&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;5,415
- &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „
- </p>
- </blockquote>
-
- <p>This more rapid transmission in a direction transverse to the
- lamination, Mr. Mallet observes, may be more than counterbalanced by
- the discontinuity of the mass transverse to the same direction.</p>
-
- <p><em>The Intensity of an Earthquake.</em>—The intensity of an earthquake
- is best estimated by the intensity of the forces which are brought
- to bear on bodies placed on the earth’s surface. These forces are
- evidently proportional<span class="pagenum" id="Page_52">52</span>
- to the rate of change of velocity in the body,
- and, as the destructive effect will be proportional to the maximum
- forces, we may consistently indicate the intensity of an earthquake by
- giving the maximum acceleration to which bodies were subject during
- the disturbance. On the assumption that the motion of a point on
- the earth’s surface is simple harmonic, the maximum acceleration is
- directly as the maximum velocity and inversely as the amplitude of
- motion, or as
- <span class="frac"><sup><i>v</i><sup>2</sup></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>a</i></sub></span>
- where <i>v</i> indicates velocity and <i>a</i> amplitude.</p>
-
- <p>The next question of importance is to determine the manner in which
- earthquake energy becomes dissipated—that is, to compare together
- the intensity of an earthquake as recorded at two or more points at
- different distances from the origin. First let us imagine the origin
- of our earthquake to be surrounded by concentric shells, each of
- which is the breadth of the vibration of a particle. Going outwards
- from the centre, each successive shell will contain a greater number
- of particles, this number increasing directly as the square of the
- distance from the origin. Let the blow have its origin at the centre,
- and give a vibratory movement to the particles in one of the shells
- near the centre.</p>
-
- <p>This shell may be supposed to possess a certain amount of energy,
- which will be measured by its mass and the square of the velocity of
- its particles. In transferring this energy to the neighbouring shell
- which surrounds it, because it has to set in motion a greater number
- of particles than it contains itself, the energy in any one particle
- of the second layer will be less than the energy in any one particle
- in the first layer; the total energy in the second shell, however,
- will be equal to the total energy in the first shell. Neglecting the
- energy lost during the transfer, if<span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">53</span>
- the energy in a particle of the
- first shell at any particular phase of the motion be <span class="smcap">k</span><sub>1</sub>,
- and the energy in a particle of the second shell <span class="smcap">k</span><sub>2</sub>, these
- quantities are to each other inversely as the masses of the shells—that
- is, inversely as the squares of the mean radii of the shells.</p>
-
- <p>In symbols,
- <span class="icenter"><span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">k</span><sub>2</sub></sup><span>/</span><sub><span class="smcap">k</span><sub>1</sub></sub></span>
- &nbsp;=&nbsp; <span class="frac"><sup><i>r</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>r</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup></sub></span></span>
- <span class="right">(1)</span>
- </p>
-
- <p>Assuming that energy is dissipated,</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- <span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">k</span><sub>2</sub></sup><span>/</span><sub><span class="smcap">k</span><sub>1</sub></sub></span>
- &nbsp;&gt;&nbsp; <span class="frac"><sup><i>r</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>r</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup></sub></span>
- &nbsp;=&nbsp; <i>f</i>&nbsp; <span class="frac"><sup><i>r</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>r</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup></sub></span>
- <span class="right">(2)</span>
- </div>
-
- <p class="noindent">where <i>f</i> &lt; 1 is the rate of dissipation of energy which is assumed to
- be constant.</p>
-
- <p><em>Area of greatest Overturning Moment.</em>—Although the rate of dissipation
- of the impulsive effects of an earthquake may follow a law like that
- just enumerated, it must be remembered that if the depth of the origin
- is comparable with the radius of the area which is shaken, the maximum
- impulsive effect as exhibited by the actual destruction on the surface
- may not be immediately above the origin where buildings have simply
- been lifted vertically up and down, but at some distance from this
- point, where the impulsive effort has been more oblique.</p>
-
- <p>At the <em>epicentrum</em> we have the maximum of the true intensity as
- measured by the acceleration of a particle, or the height to which
- a body might be projected, but it will be at some distance from
- this where we shall have the maximum intensity as exhibited by an
- overturning effort.</p>
-
- <p>This will be rendered clear by the following diagram.</p>
-
- <p>In the accompanying diagram let <span class="smcap">o</span> be the origin of a shock,
- and <span class="smcap">o c</span> the seismic vertical equal to <i>r</i>. Let the direct or
- normal shock emerge at <span class="smcap">c</span>, <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>1</sub>, <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>2</sub>, and
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">54</span>
- at the angles <i>θ</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>θ</i><sub>2</sub>, &amp;c.</p>
-
- <p>Assuming that the displacement of an earth particle at <span class="smcap">c</span>
- equals <span class="smcap">c b</span>, and at <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>1</sub> equals <i>c</i><sub>1</sub> <i>b</i><sub>1</sub>,
- and at <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>2</sub> equals <i>c</i><sub>2</sub> <i>b</i><sub>2</sub>, &amp;c., and let these
- displacements <span class="smcap">c b</span>, <i>c</i><sub>1</sub> <i>b</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>c</i><sub>2</sub> <i>b</i><sub>2</sub>, &amp;c., for
- the sake of argument, vary inversely as <i>r</i>, <i>r</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>r</i><sub>2</sub>, &amp;c.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p054.jpg" width="460" height="164" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 9.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>The question is to determine where the horizontal component <span class="smcap">c a</span>
- of these normal motions is a maximum.</p>
-
- <p>First observe that the triangle <span class="smcap">o c</span> <i>c</i> is similar to <i>a</i>,
- <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>.</p>
-
- <p>Also <i>r</i> = <span class="frac"><sup><i>h</i></sup><span>/</span><sub>sin <i>θ</i></sub></span>,
- and therefore the normal component <i>c</i><sub>1</sub>
- <i>b</i><sub>1</sub> at <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>1</sub> is equal to
- <span class="smcap">c</span> <span class="frac"><sup>sin <i>θ</i></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>h</i></sub></span>.</p>
-
- <p>Also <i>c</i><sub>1</sub> <i>a</i><sub>1</sub> = <i>c</i><sub>1</sub> <i>b</i><sub>1</sub>, cos <i>θ</i>.</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- ∴ <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>1</sub> <i>a</i> = <span class="smcap">c</span>
- <span class="frac"><sup>sin <i>θ</i> cos <i>θ</i></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>h</i></sub></span>
- = <span class="frac"><sup><i>c</i></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>h</i></sub></span>
- ∙ <span class="frac"><sup>sin 2<i>θ</i></sup><span>/</span><sub>2</sub></span>,
- </div>
-
- <p class="noindent">and sin 2<i>θ</i> is greatest when 2<i>θ</i> = 90° or <i>θ</i> = 45°.</p>
-
- <p>That is to say, the horizontal component reaches a maximum where the
- angle of emergence equals 45°.</p>
-
- <p>This question has been discussed on the assumption that the amplitude
- of an earth particle varies inversely as its distance from the origin
- of the shock. Should we, however, assume that this amplitude varies
- inversely as the square of the distance from the origin, we are led to
- the result that the area of greatest disturbance is nearer to the point
- where the angle of emergence is 55° 44′ 9″.
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_55">55</span> Both of these methods are
- referred to by Mallet, but the first is considered as probably the more
- correct.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquake Waves.</em>—Hitherto we have chiefly considered earthquake
- vibrations; now we will say a few words about earthquake waves. If
- we strike a long iron rod at one end, we can imagine that, as in the
- long spring, a pulse-like motion is transmitted. If the rod be struck
- quickly, the pulses will rapidly succeed each other, and if struck
- slowly the pulses will be at longer intervals. Each individual pulse,
- however, will travel along the rod at the same rate, and hence the
- distance between any two will remain constant; but that distance will
- depend on the interval between the blows producing these pulses being
- equal to the distance travelled by one pulse before the next blow is
- struck.</p>
-
- <p>From this we see that an irregular disturbance will produce an
- irregular succession of motions; some will be like long undulations in
- a wide deep ocean, whilst others will be like ripples in a shallow bay.
- Again, consider the bar to be struck one blow only, and then left to
- itself. The bar will propagate a series of pulses along its length, due
- to the out and in vibration of its end. These will succeed each other
- at regular intervals, and will be mixed up with the pulses we have
- previously considered.</p>
-
- <p>From this we see that in an earthquake, if it be produced by one blow,
- the motion will be isochronous in its character; but if it be due to
- a succession of blows at regular intervals, the motion will be the
- resultant of a series of isochronous motions, and will be periodical.
- If the impulses are irregular, you have a motion which is the resultant
- of a number of isochronous motions due to each impulse, but these
- compounded together in a different manner at each instant during the
- earthquake, and giving as a result a motion which is in no sense
- isochronous.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_56">56</span>
- This approaches more nearly to the actual motions we feel
- as earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>If we can imagine the ground shaken by an earthquake, made of a
- transparent material which transmitted less light when compressed,
- and we could look down upon a long extent of this at the time of an
- earthquake, we should see a series of dark bands indicating strips of
- country which were compressed. The distances between these bands might
- be irregular. Keeping our attention on one particular band, this would
- be seen to travel forward in a direction from the source. If we kept
- our eye on one particular point, it would appear to open and shut,
- becoming light and dark alternately.</p>
-
- <p>As to the existence of these elastic waves in actual earthquakes we
- have no direct experimental evidence. The only kind of wave with which
- we are familiar is a true surface undulation, which, although having
- the appearance of a water-wave, may nevertheless represent a district
- of compression.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_IV">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_57">57</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER IV.<br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTHQUAKE MOTION AS DEDUCED FROM EXPERIMENT.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Experiments with falling weights—Experiments with
- explosives—Results obtained from experiments—Relative motion
- of two adjacent points—The effect of hills and excavations
- upon the propagation of vibrations—The intensity of artificial
- disturbances—Velocity with which earth vibrations are
- propagated—Experiments of Mallet—Experiments of Abbot—Experiments
- in Japan—Mallet’s results—Abbot’s results—Results obtained in
- Japan.</div>
-
- <p><em>Experiments with Falling Weights.</em>—A series of experiments, as the
- nature of the disturbance produced in the surface of the earth when
- a heavy weight is allowed to fall on it, was begun in November 1880
- by Mr. T. Gray and the author. These experiments were carried out at
- the Akabane Engineering Works in Tokio. The weight used was a ball
- of iron weighing about a ton, which in the different experiments was
- allowed to fall from heights varying between ten and thirty-five feet.
- The position of the place where the ball was allowed to fall was such
- that in one direction the vibrations were transmitted up the side of
- a steep hill, in another direction across a pond with perpendicular
- sides, and in another direction across a level plain the material of
- which consisted for the most part of hardened mud extending to a very
- considerable depth. The vibrations produced by the fall of the ball
- were transmitted through this hard mud with considerable intensity to a
- distance of between 300 and 400 feet.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_58">58</span></p>
-
- <p>The object of the experiment was to find the nature of the vibrations
- produced in the crust of the earth by such a blow, the velocity of
- transmission through this comparatively soft material, the effect of
- hills and excavations in cutting off such disturbances, and the law
- according to which the amplitude of the vibrations diminishes with the
- distance from the source.</p>
-
- <p>A considerable variety of apparatus was used during these experiments,
- but the most reliable results were obtained from the records of a
- rolling sphere seismograph, which wrote the vibrations on a stationary
- plate, and from the records of two bracket seismographs, similar to
- Professor Ewing’s horizontal lever seismographs, which gave a record
- of the vibrations as two rectangular components on a moving plate of
- smoked glass.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p058.jpg" width="514" height="283" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 10.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>The general result as to the nature of the disturbance was that two
- distinct sets of vibrations were set up by the blow. In one set the
- direction of motion was along a line joining the point of observation
- with the point from which the disturbance emanated; in the other set
- the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_59">59</span>
- direction of motion was at right angles to that line. The nature
- of the resultant motion will be gathered from fig. 10, which is taken
- from the records drawn by the rolling sphere seismograph at a distance
- of 50 feet, 100 feet, and 200 feet respectively from the point where
- the ball struck the ground. The direct or normal vibrations reached
- the instrument first, and were followed at an interval depending on
- the distance of the instrument from the origin by the transverse
- vibrations. From the records of these two sets of vibrations as
- separated by the bracket seismographs, combined with the known rate of
- motion of the glass plate, the velocity of transmission was found to
- be, for normal vibrations 446–438 feet per second, and for transverse
- vibrations 357–353 feet per second.</p>
-
- <p>The effect of the hill in cutting off the disturbance seemed to be
- slight, but the direction of the vibrations which ascended the side
- was mostly transverse. The pond, on the other hand, seemed completely
- to cut off the disturbance, which, however, gradually crept round the
- side, so that only a comparatively small triangular area was in shadow.</p>
-
- <p>The amplitude of the vibrations diminished directly as the distance
- increased for some distance from the origin, but at greater distance
- the rate of diminution seemed to be slower. The transverse vibration
- seemed to die out less quickly than the normal vibrations.<a id="FNanchor_9" href="#Footnote_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p>
-
- <p>These experiments were afterwards very considerably extended by the
- author. In these later experiments charges of from one to two pounds of
- dynamite were placed in bore-holes of various depths and exploded by
- means of electricity. The results obtained confirmed the conclusions
- already arrived at from the former experiments. The experiments on
- velocity, however, seemed to indicate <span class="pagenum" id="Page_60">60</span>
- that the higher the initial
- impulse the greater was the velocity. The velocity of propagation of
- the transverse vibrations seemed to approach more and more to that of
- the directed vibrations as the distance from the origin of disturbance
- increased. Fig. 11 shows the nature of the record obtained from the
- explosion of two pounds of dynamite at the bottom of a bore-hole eight
- feet deep. These records show the interval of time which elapsed
- between the arrival of the normal and the transverse vibrations at
- points distant 100, 250, and 400 feet from the bore-hole. In the case
- of the 100-feet station it will be observed that the motion towards the
- origin is greater than that from the origin. It is also to be noticed
- that the period of vibration becomes greater as the distance from the
- origin increases.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p060.jpg" width="563" height="458" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 11.</span>—Records obtained at three stations
- of the motion of the ground produced by the explosion of 2 lbs. of
- dynamite.</div>
- </div>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_61">61</span></p>
-
- <p><em>The Intensity of Artificial Disturbances.</em>—The data which we have at
- our disposal for determining the intensity of an earth particle which
- has been caused to vibrate by the explosion of a charge of dynamite are
- a series of records similar to that given on <a href="#Page_60">p. 60</a>. These disturbances
- are practically surface movements, and may be compared with the
- movements of an earthquake which spreads over an area the radius of
- which is great as compared with its depth.</p>
-
- <p>To find the mean acceleration of an earth particle, which quantity
- has been taken to represent intensity, during any simple backward or
- forward motion of the earth, it will be first necessary to determine
- the amplitude of this motion and its maximum velocity, the mean
- acceleration being equal to
- <span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">v</span><sup>2</sup></sup><span>/</span><sub>2<span class="smcap">a</span></sub></span>.</p>
-
- <div class="figright">
- <img src="images/i_p061.jpg" width="349" height="265" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 12.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>The second and third movements in a shock invariably exhibited the
- greatest intensity, and to a distance of 400 feet from the origin,
- where about three pounds of dynamite had been exploded in a bore-hole
- about six feet deep, these intensities decreased directly as the
- distance from the origin. The less intense movements also decreased
- directly as the distance from the origin to a certain point, but after
- that they decreased more slowly. A mean result of the more prominent
- vibrations in four sets of experiments is shown in the curve, fig. 12,
- where the horizontal measurements
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_62">62</span> represent distance from the origin
- in feet, and the vertical measurements mean acceleration in thousands
- of millimetres per second.</p>
-
- <p>This curve approximates to an equi-angular hyperbola. The area between
- the curve and its asymptotes is proportional to the whole energy of
- the shock. The area of the diagram is proportional to the energy given
- up to the ground by the explosion of three pounds of dynamite. If we
- call the unit shock the effect produced by the explosion of one pound
- of dynamite, the above artificial earthquake had an intensity equal to
- three.</p>
-
- <p>The only other investigations which have been made in this interesting
- branch of observational seismology are those by Mr. Robert Mallet,<a id="FNanchor_10" href="#Footnote_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a>
- and those by General Henry L. Abbot.<a id="FNanchor_11" href="#Footnote_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Mallet’s Results.</em>—The velocity with which earth vibrations were
- transmitted as deduced by Mr. Mallet were as follows:—</p>
-
- <table summary="Mallets results">
- <tr>
- <th>&nbsp;</th>
- <th>Feet per second</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdhang">In sand</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>824·915</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdhang">In contorted stratified rock, quartz, and slate at Holyhead</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1,088·669</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdhang">In discontinuous and much shattered granite</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1,306·425</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdhang">In more solid granite</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1,664·574</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>A striking result which was obtained by Mallet in his experiments at
- Holyhead was that the transit velocity increases with an increase in
- the intensity of the initial shock. Thus with a charge of 12,000 pounds
- of powder the transit rate was 1,373 feet per second, whilst with 2,100
- pounds the transit rate was 1,099 feet per second. In these experiments
- tremors were observed as preceding and following the main shock.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_63">63</span></p>
-
- <p><em>Abbot’s Results.</em>—The important results obtained by General Abbot are
- contained in the following table:—</p>
-
- <table id="AbbotsResults" summary="Abbots results">
- <tr>
- <th>No. of Observation</th>
- <th>Date</th>
- <th>Cause of Shock</th>
- <th>Distance to<br />Station in miles</th>
- <th>Type of Seismometer</th>
- <th>Velocity in<br />feet per second</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">Aug. 18, 1876</td>
- <td class="tdc">200 lbs. of dynamite</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>5 ±&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">B</td>
- <td class="tdc">5,280</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">Sep. 24, 1876</td>
- <td class="tdc">Hallet’s Point Explosion</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>5·134</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">A</td>
- <td class="tdc">3,873</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdc">„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; </td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>8·330</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">B</td>
- <td class="tdc">8,300</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdc">„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; </td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9·333</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">A</td>
- <td class="tdc">4,521</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdc">„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; </td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>12·769</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">B</td>
- <td class="tdc">5,309</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">Oct 10, 1876</td>
- <td class="tdc">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 70 lbs. dynamite</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1·360</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">A</td>
- <td class="tdc">1,240</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">Sept. 6, 1877</td>
- <td class="tdc">400&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; </td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1·169</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">A</td>
- <td class="tdc">3,428</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdc">&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1·169</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">B</td>
- <td class="tdc">8,814</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">Sept. 12, 1877</td>
- <td class="tdc">200&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; </td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1·340</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">A</td>
- <td class="tdc">6,730</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdc">&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1·340</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">B</td>
- <td class="tdc">8,730</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdc">&nbsp; 70&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; </td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1·340</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">A</td>
- <td class="tdc">5,559</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdc">&nbsp; &nbsp;„ &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1·340</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">B</td>
- <td class="tdc">8,415</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>A seismometer of type A means that the telescope used in observing the
- tremor produced on the surface of a vessel of mercury by the passage of
- the shock had a magnification of 6, whilst a telescope of the type B
- had a magnification of 12.</p>
-
- <p>The mean velocity given by six observations with type A is 4,225 feet
- per second, while that given by the same number with type B is 7,475
- feet per second.</p>
-
- <div class="figright">
- <img src="images/i_p063.jpg" width="283" height="151" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 13.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>If we assume that the first tremor observed in the mercury is to
- determine the true rate of transmission, General Abbot tells us that we
- must reject all observations made with type A, inasmuch as they do not
- reveal the velocity of the leading tremor. However, he also tells
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_64">64</span> us
- that a still higher power above 12 might have detected still earlier
- tremors.</p>
-
- <p>When gunpowder was the explosive, the observers noted that the
- disturbance observed in the mercury took a much longer time to reach a
- maximum than it did when dynamite was employed.</p>
-
- <p>It was also observed that explosions fired beneath deep water gave
- a higher velocity than similar explosions which took place beneath
- shallow water. In the latter case much of the energy was probably
- expended in throwing a jet of water into the air.</p>
-
- <p>Another point which was observed appears to have been that the rate
- varied with the initial shock. Thus:—</p>
-
- <table summary="Shockwave velocity">
- <tr>
- <th>&nbsp;</th>
- <th>Feet per second</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="left">400 lbs. of dynamite gave</td>
- <td class="tdc"><div>8,814</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="left">200&nbsp; &nbsp;„ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdc"><div>8,730</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="left">&nbsp; 70&nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; powder (deep) gave</td>
- <td class="tdc"><div>8,415</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>Also it is probable that the rate of a wave diminished with its
- advance. For,</p>
-
- <table summary="Shockwave velocity per distance">
- <tr>
- <th>&nbsp;</th>
- <th>Feet per second</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="left">&nbsp; 200&nbsp; lbs. of dynamite gave for 1&nbsp; &nbsp; mile</td>
- <td class="tdc"><div>8,730</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="left">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 5&nbsp; &nbsp; miles</td>
- <td class="tdc"><div>5,250</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="left">50,000&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 8&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdc"><div>8,300</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="left">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;13½&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="tdc"><div>5,300</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>General Abbot’s general conclusions are:—</p>
-
- <p>1. A high magnifying power of telescope is essential in seismometric
- observations.</p>
-
- <p>2. The more violent the initial shock the higher is the velocity of
- transmission.</p>
-
- <p>3. This velocity diminishes as the general wave advances.</p>
-
- <p>4. The movements of the earth’s crust are complex, consisting of many
- short waves first, increasing and then decreasing in amplitude; and
- with a detonating explosive the interval between the first wave and
- the maximum<span class="pagenum" id="Page_65">65</span>
- wave, at any station, is shorter than with a slow burning
- explosive.</p>
-
- <p><em>Results obtained in Japan.</em>—From some experiments made by the author
- in the grounds of the Meteorological Department in Tokio, the following
- results were obtained:—</p>
-
- <table id="JapanResults" class="collapse" summary="Japan shockwave velocity">
- <tr>
- <th colspan="3" class="ball">No. of Explosion</th>
- <th class="ball">Velocity in feet per second for the first 200 ft. (A to B)</th>
- <th class="ball">Velocity in feet per second for the second 200 ft. (B to C)</th>
- <th class="ball">Velocity in feet per second for 400 ft. (A to C)</th>
- <th class="ball">Number of Cartridges of Dynamite (6 = 1 lb.)</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc bl" rowspan="4">Vertical vibrations</td>
- <td class="tdr x400" rowspan="4"><div>{</div></td>
- <td class="tdr0 br"><div>I.</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">464</td>
- <td class="tdc br">186</td>
- <td class="tdc br">265</td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>8·3</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr0 br"><div>III.</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">&mdash;</td>
- <td class="tdc br">211</td>
- <td class="tdc br">&mdash;</td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>10·1</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr0 br"><div>IV.</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">352</td>
- <td class="tdc br">234</td>
- <td class="tdc br">281</td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>7·1</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr0 br"><div>V.</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">343</td>
- <td class="tdc br">232</td>
- <td class="tdc br">277</td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>5·0</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc bl" rowspan="2">Normal vibrations</td>
- <td class="tdr x200" rowspan="2"><div>{</div></td>
- <td class="tdr0 br"><div>VI.</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">&mdash;</td>
- <td class="tdc br">&mdash;</td>
- <td class="tdc br">407</td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>10·0</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr0 br"><div>VII.</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">&mdash;</td>
- <td class="tdc br">&mdash;</td>
- <td class="tdc br">516</td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>12·5</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc bl bb">Transverse vibrations</td>
- <td class="tdr x200 bb"><div>}</div></td>
- <td class="tdr0 br bb"><div>VIII.</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br bb">&mdash;</td>
- <td class="tdc br bb">&mdash;</td>
- <td class="tdc br bb">344</td>
- <td class="tdrx br bb"><div>12·5</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>The general results to be deduced from the above appear to be:—</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">1. For vertical motion.</p>
-
- <p class="hang2">(<i>a</i>) For the first 200 feet. The velocity depends upon the initial
- force—the greater the charge of dynamite the greater the velocity.</p>
-
- <p class="hang2">(<i>b</i>) For the second 200 feet. The above law only appears in
- experiments IV. and V., but it must be remembered that the origins
- of I. and III. were farther removed from A than IV. and V.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">The speed of the wave during the second 200 feet is always less
- than during the first 200 feet.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">2. For normal vibrations.</p>
-
- <p class="hang2">Here the speed between A and C is all that was measured, but we
- again see that the greater the initial force, or the nearer we are
- to the origin of the disturbance, the greater is the velocity. This
- velocity is greater than the velocity of the vertical or transverse
- vibrations.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_66">66</span></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">3. For transverse vibrations.</p>
-
- <p class="hang2">If we assume that the vertical vibrations are a component of the
- transverse motions we see the same law as before—namely, that the
- nearer we are to the origin of the disturbance the greater is the
- speed with which that disturbance is propagated.</p>
-
- <p>It will be observed that the chief law here enunciated respecting the
- decrease in speed of earth vibrations is the same as that pointed
- out by General Abbot, from which it only differs by its being in all
- cases proved without the introduction of personal errors, for the same
- explosion, along the same line of ground and for different kinds of
- vibrations.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_V">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_67">67</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER V.<br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTHQUAKE MOTION AS DEDUCED FROM OBSERVATION ON EARTHQUAKES.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Result of feelings—The direction of motion—Instruments as
- indicators of direction—Duration of an earthquake—Period of
- vibration—The amplitude of earth movements—Side of greatest
- motion—Intensity of earthquakes—Velocity and acceleration of an
- earth particle—Absolute intensity of an earthquake—Radiation of an
- earthquake—Velocity of propagation.</div>
-
- <p><em>Result of Feelings.</em>—As the result of our experiences, and by
- observations upon the movements produced in various bodies, we can
- say that an ordinary earthquake consists of a number of backward and
- forward motions of the ground following each other in quick succession.
- Sometimes these commence and die out so gently that those who have
- endeavoured to time the duration of an earthquake have found it
- difficult to say when the shock commenced and when it ended. This was
- a difficulty which Mr. James Bissett in Yokohama, and the author in
- Tokio, had to contend against when, in 1878, they commenced to time
- shocks between these two places.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes these motions gradually increase to a maximum and then die
- out as gradually as they commenced.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes the maximum comes suddenly, and at other times during an
- earthquake our feelings distinctly tell us that there are several
- maxima.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_68">68</span></p>
-
- <p>These have been the experiences of many observers, and have been
- recorded by writers since the earliest times. Mallet devotes a
- chapter to a consideration of the tremulous motion that precedes and
- follows a shock, and he tells us that a single shock is an absolute
- impossibility. In speaking of earthquakes, he says: ‘The almost
- universal succession of phenomena recorded in earthquakes is, first a
- trembling, then a severe shock, or several in quick succession, and
- then a trembling gradually but rapidly becoming insensible.’</p>
-
- <p>A quantitative and exact knowledge of the nature of earthquake
- motion has only been attained of late years. The chief results which
- investigators have aimed at have been the measurement of the amplitude,
- the period, the direction, and the duration of the motions which
- constitute an earthquake. Attention has also been given to the velocity
- with which a disturbance is propagated.</p>
-
- <p><em>The Direction of Motion.</em>—One of the most ordinary observations
- which are made about an earthquake is its direction. If we were to
- ask the inhabitants of a town which had been shaken by an earthquake
- the direction of the motion they experienced, it is not unlikely that
- their replies would include all the points of the compass. Many,
- in consequence of their alarm, have not been able to make accurate
- observations. Others have been deceived by the motion of the building
- in which they were situated. Some tell us that the motion had been
- north and south, whilst others say that it was east and west. A certain
- number have recognised several motions, and amongst the rest there will
- be a few who have felt a wriggling or twisting. Leaving out exceptional
- cases, the general result obtained from personal observation as to
- the direction of an earthquake of moderate intensity is extremely
- indefinite, and the only satisfactory information
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_69">69</span> to be obtained is
- that derived from instruments or from the effects of the earthquake
- exhibited in shattered buildings and bodies which had been overturned
- or projected.</p>
-
- <p>By the direction in which walls, columns, and other objects had been
- overthrown or fractured, Mallet was enabled to determine the position
- of the origin of the Neapolitan earthquake. Similar phenomena have many
- times been taken advantage of by other investigators of earthquake
- phenomena. Effects produced upon structures are, however, only to be
- observed as the results of a destructive earthquake, at which time
- cities may be regarded as collections of seismometers. (<em>See</em> chapter
- on Effects in Buildings.)</p>
-
- <p>To determine the direction of movement during a small earthquake, the
- most satisfactory method appears to be an appeal to instruments.</p>
-
- <p><em>Instruments as Indicators of Direction.</em>—The relative values of
- different kinds of instruments, such as columns, pendulums, and the
- like, as indicators of direction have already been discussed.</p>
-
- <p>By the use of pendulum seismographs it has been shown that during an
- earthquake the ground may move in one, two, or several directions (see
- <a href="#Page_21">p. 21</a>); and it is, generally speaking, only in those cases where we
- experience a decided shock in the disturbance that we can determine
- with any confidence the direction in which the motion has been
- propagated. Such directions are usually indicated by the major axis of
- certain more or less elliptical figures which have been drawn, which
- in themselves appear to indicate the combination of two rectilinear
- movements.</p>
-
- <p>Results similar to those indicated by the records of pendulum
- seismographs have also been obtained upon moving plates with a double
- bracket seismograph. Thus,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_70">70</span>
- in the earthquake which shook Tokio at 6
- <span class="smcap">a.m.</span> on July 5, 1881, there were indications of the following
- motions:—</p>
-
- <p>Near the commencement of the shock the motion was N. 112° E. One and a
- half second after this, the direction of motion appears to have been
- N. 50° E. In three-fourths of a second more it gradually changed to a
- direction N. 145° E., and after a similar interval to N. 62° E. Half a
- second after this it was N. 132° E., and four seconds later the motion
- was again in the original direction—namely, N. 112° E.</p>
-
- <p>These particular directions of motion have been selected because they
- were so definitely indicated.</p>
-
- <p>The commonest type of earthquake which is experienced in Japan, and
- probably also in other earthquake-shaken districts, is the compound or
- diastrophic form.</p>
-
- <p>That earthquakes often have motions compounded of two sets of
- vibrations, has also been proved by the analysis of the records
- obtained from two component seismographs. From an analysis of a record
- of this description, Professor Ewing has shown that in the earthquake
- felt in Tokio on March 11, 1881, there were approximate circular
- (somewhat spiral) movements.</p>
-
- <p>This leads us to the consideration of the twisting and wriggling
- motions which are said to be experienced by some observers. Motions
- like these, which by the Italians and Mexicans are called <i xml:lang="es">vorticosi</i>,
- are usually supposed to be the cause of objects like chimneys and
- gravestones being rotated. These phenomena, it will be seen from what
- is said in the chapter upon the effects produced in buildings, can be
- more easily explained upon the supposition of a simple rectilinear
- movement.</p>
-
- <p>That at the time of an earthquake there may be motion in more than one
- direction has been recognised since the time of Aristotle; and it is
- possible that two sets<span class="pagenum" id="Page_71">71</span>
- of rectilinear motion, as, for instance, the
- normal and transverse movements, may have led observers to imagine that
- there has been a twisting motion taking place, and this especially when
- the two sets of movements have quickly succeeded each other.</p>
-
- <p>Persons inside flexible buildings may possibly have experienced more
- or less of a rotatory motion, although the shock was rectilinear; the
- building assuming such a motion in consequence of its construction and
- its position with regard to the direction of the shock.</p>
-
- <p>In the case of destructive earthquakes, especially at points situated
- practically above the origin, the universal testimony, Mallet tells
- us, is that a twisting, wriggling motion in different planes, attended
- by an up-and-down movement of greater range, is experienced. To such
- disturbances the word <i xml:lang="es">sussultatore</i> is sometimes applied. Mallet has
- given many elliptical and other closed curves to illustrate the nature
- of such motions.</p>
-
- <p><em>Duration of an Earthquake.</em>—When reading accounts of earthquakes
- it is often difficult to determine the length of time a shaking was
- continuous. In Japan, in <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 745, there was a shaking which
- is said to have lasted sixty hours; and in <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 977 there were
- a series of shakings lasting 300 days. Often we meet with records of
- disturbances which have lasted from twenty to seventy days.</p>
-
- <p>At San Salvador, in 1879, more than 600 shocks were felt within ten
- days; in 1850, at Honduras, there were 108 shocks in a week; in 1746,
- at Lima, 200 shocks were felt in twenty-four hours; at the island of
- St. Thomas, in 1868, 283 shocks were felt during about ten hours.</p>
-
- <p>Disturbances like these, which succeed each other with sufficient
- rapidity to cause an almost continual trembling in the ground, may be
- regarded as collectively forming one great seismic effort which may
- last a minute, an hour,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_72">72</span>
- a day, a week, or even several years. Strictly
- speaking, they are a series of separate earthquakes, the resultant
- vibrations of which more or less overlap. Whenever a large earthquake
- occurs it is generally succeeded by a large number of smaller shocks.</p>
-
- <p>The seismic disturbance as regards time is, as Mallet remarks, very
- often ‘like an occasional cannonade during a continuous but irregular
- rattle of musketry.’ In the New Zealand earthquake of 1848, shocks
- continued for nearly five weeks, and during a large portion of the time
- there were at least 1,000 shocks per day.<a id="FNanchor_12" href="#Footnote_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a></p>
-
- <p>The earthquake of Lisbon, which in five minutes destroyed the whole
- town, was followed by a series of disturbances lasting over several
- months. After Basle had, on October 18, 1356, been laid in ruins,
- it is stated shocks followed each other for a period of a year. The
- Calabrian earthquake was continued with considerable strength for a
- year, and it is said that the earth did not come completely to rest for
- ten years. During this cannonade the heavy shocks announced, as they
- do in most earthquake countries at the present day, a series of weaker
- disturbances. In certain exceptional cases this order of events has
- been inverted, and slight shocks have announced the coming of heavy
- ones. Fuchs gives an example of this in the earthquake of Broussa, when
- the first shock was on February 28, 1855. On March 9 and 23 there were
- heavier shocks, but the heaviest did not arrive until March 28.</p>
-
- <p>Under certain conditions it is possible to have a sensible vibration
- produced in the ground which is practically of unlimited duration;
- thus, for instance, it has been noticed that the falling of water
- at certain large waterfalls, by its continuous rhythmical impact on
- the <span class="pagenum" id="Page_73">73</span>
- rocks, produces in them tremors which are to be observed at
- great distances. Of this the author convinced himself at the Falls
- of Niagara, where he observed the reflected and ever-moving image of
- the sun in a pool of water. Under favourable circumstances almost
- continual condensation of steam might take place in volcanic foci, each
- condensation giving rise to a blow sufficiently powerful to produce
- vibrations in the surrounding ground. Those who have stood near a large
- geyser, like the one in Iceland, when it makes an ineffectual effort
- to erupt, will recognise how powerful such a cause might be. Humboldt
- has remarked shocks on Vesuvius and Pichincha which were periodic,
- occurring twenty to thirty seconds before each ejection of vapour and
- ashes.</p>
-
- <p>Earthquakes like these may be of vast extent, gradually spreading
- further and further outwards. This spreading of earth vibrations may
- be observed at a large factory containing heavy machinery or a steam
- hammer. After the machinery comes to rest, it is probably some time
- before the ground returns to rest. Examples of disturbances of this
- nature are spoken of under the head of Earth Tremors.</p>
-
- <p>The record of the duration of an ordinary earthquake as observed at a
- given point is dependent upon the sensibility of our instruments.</p>
-
- <p>Continuous motions perceptible to our senses without the aid of
- instruments usually last from thirty seconds to about two or three
- minutes. In Japan the shocks, as timed by watches, usually last from
- twenty to forty seconds. Occasionally a continuous shaking is felt for
- more than one and a half minutes, and cases have been recorded where
- the motion has continued for as much as four minutes and thirty-three
- seconds.</p>
-
- <p>Seismometers having a multiplication of 6 to 12
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_74">74</span> usually indicate that
- motion continues longer than is perceptible to the senses.</p>
-
- <p><em>Period of Vibration.</em>—When an earthquake contains several prominent
- vibrations which might be called the <em>shocks</em> of the disturbance, our
- feelings tell us that these have occurred at unequal intervals.</p>
-
- <p>About the time which is taken for the complete backward and forward
- oscillation of the ground which constitutes the shock a little has
- already been said. This was deduced from the records of disturbances as
- drawn by seismographs. From the same sources we can readily obtain the
- period of all the prominent vibrations in a disturbance.</p>
-
- <p>In any given earthquake there are irregularities in period, and
- different earthquakes differ from each other. About the early attempts
- to determine the period of earth vibrations something has been said in
- the chapter on Earthquake Instruments.</p>
-
- <p>In the earthquake of March 11 (referred to on <a href="#Page_70">p. 70</a>) we find that both
- components commenced with a series of small vibrations, about five or
- six to the second; next came the shock, consisting of two complete
- vibrations executed in two seconds. In this it is to be observed that
- the motion eastwards was performed much more quickly than the motion
- westwards. Next, by reference to the east and west component, it is
- seen that there are a number of large vibrations, about one per second,
- on which a number of smaller motions are superposed. As the motion
- proceeds, these become less and less definitely pronounced and more
- irregular in their intervals, until finally the motion dies away.</p>
-
- <p>This earthquake, as recorded at the author’s house in Tokio, lasted
- about one and a half minute.</p>
-
- <p>The same earthquake, as recorded by Professor Ewing
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_75">75</span> at a station
- situated about one and a half mile distant, but on flat ground, appears
- to have lasted four and a half minutes. The largest wave had a period
- of 0·7 second.</p>
-
- <p>In the earthquake of March 8, 1881, there were on an average 1·4
- vibrations per second. These vibrations were executed in a direction
- transverse to the line joining the observing station and the locality
- from which the disturbance must have originated as determined by time
- observations. It can, therefore, be assumed that these vibrations,
- having so slow a period, were transverse motions, this slowness or
- sluggishness being due to the fact that the modulus for distortion
- is less than the modulus which governs the propagation of normal
- vibrations.</p>
-
- <p><em>The Amplitude of Earth Movements.</em>—In making estimates of the
- distances through which we are moved backward and forward at the time
- of an earthquake, if we judge by our feelings, we may often be misled.
- If a person is out of doors and walking, an earthquake may take place
- sufficiently strong to cause chimneys to fall and unroof houses, which,
- so far as the actual shaking of the ground is concerned, will be passed
- by unnoticed. On the other hand, to persons indoors, especially on an
- upper story, it is impossible even for a tremor to pass by without
- creating considerable alarm by the angular movement that has been taken
- up by the building.</p>
-
- <p>Many observers have endeavoured to make actual measurements of the
- maximum extent through which the earth moves at the time of an
- earthquake. Among the reports of the British Association for 1841 is
- the report of a committee which had been appointed ‘for obtaining
- instruments and registers to record shocks of earthquakes in Scotland
- and Ireland’. We read that in one<span class="pagenum" id="Page_76">76</span>
- earthquake which had been measured
- the displacement of the ground had been half an inch, and in another
- it had been less than half an inch. The instruments used to make these
- observations depended upon the inertia of pendulums which at the time
- of the disturbance were supposed to remain at rest. Observations
- similar to these have been made in Japan. One long series were made by
- Mr. E. Knipping for Dr. Gr. Wagener. They extended from November 1878
- to April 1880, and were as follows:—</p>
-
- <table summary="Earthquake amplitude">
- <tr>
- <th>Number of<br />Earthquakes</th>
- <th>Maximum horizontal<br />motion of the ground</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr2"><div>10</div></td>
- <td>&nbsp; ·0&nbsp; &nbsp; to 0·15 mm.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr2"><div>7</div></td>
- <td>&nbsp; ·15&nbsp; „&nbsp; 0·5&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr2"><div>8</div></td>
- <td>&nbsp; ·5&nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; 2·5&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr2"><div>2</div></td>
- <td>2·5&nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; more &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>With his apparatus for vertical motion Dr. Wagener also made
- observations on the absolute vertical motion. This seldom reached ·02
- mm. The greatest value was that observed for the destructive shock of
- Feb. 22, 1880, which was ·56 mm.</p>
-
- <p>By means of a number of instruments distributed at various localities
- round Tokio, the chief of which were pendulums with friction pointers
- to render them ‘<em>dead beat</em>,’ and with magnifying apparatus to show
- the actual motion of the ground, the author arrived at results similar
- to those obtained by Dr. Wagener—namely, that the earth’s maximum
- horizontal motion at the time of a small earthquake was usually only
- the fraction of a millimetre, and it seldom exceeded three or four
- millimetres. When we get a motion of five or six millimetres, we
- usually find that brick and stone chimneys have been shattered.</p>
-
- <p>The results obtained for vertical motion were also very small. In Tokio
- it is seldom that vertical motion can be
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_77">77</span> detected, and when it is
- recorded it is seldom more than a millimetre.</p>
-
- <p>These results, which were put forward some years ago, have since
- received confirmation by the use of a variety of instruments in the
- hands of different observers.</p>
-
- <p>Mallet, in his account of the Neapolitan earthquake of 1857,
- approximated to the amplitude of an earth particle by observing the
- width, at the level of the centre of gravity, of fissures formed
- through and remaining in great masses of very inelastic masonry.</p>
-
- <p>Taking stations situated on or very nearly on the same line passing
- through the seismic vertical (<em>epicentrum</em>), Mallet observed the
- amplitude increased as some function of the distance, as will be seen
- from the following table:—</p>
-
- <table id="amplitude2" summary="Earthquake amplitude per distance">
- <tr>
- <th>Station</th>
- <th>Polla</th>
- <th>La Sala</th>
- <th>Certosa</th>
- <th>Tramutola</th>
- <th>Sarconi</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Distance from Seismic Vertical in geographical miles</td>
- <td class="br">3·45</td>
- <td class="br">11·60</td>
- <td class="br">16·50</td>
- <td class="br">20·60</td>
- <td class="br">26·7</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br bb">Amplitude in inches</td>
- <td class="br bb">2·5</td>
- <td class="br bb">&nbsp; 3·5</td>
- <td class="br bb">&nbsp; 4·0</td>
- <td class="br bb">&nbsp; 4·5</td>
- <td class="br bb">&nbsp; 4·75</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>The possibility of a law such as this having an existence for places at
- a distance from the seismic vertical comparable with the vertical depth
- of the centrum will be shown farther on.</p>
-
- <p>With regard to the maximum displacement of an earth particle. Mallet
- was of opinion that there was evidence to show that it had in some
- cases been over one foot. M. Abella, in an earthquake which occurred in
- the Philippines in 1881, made a rough observation of the motion of the
- earth to a distance of about <em>two metres</em>. This, as might be expected,
- was beyond the elastic limits of the material, and caused fissures to
- be formed, which were seen to open and shut.</p>
-
- <p><em>Intensity of Earthquakes.</em>—In speaking of the strength
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_78">78</span> of an
- earthquake, we usually employ terms like ‘weak,’ ‘strong,’ ‘violent,’
- &amp;c. Although these expressions, accompanied by illustration of the
- effects which an earth quake has produced, convey a general idea of
- the strength of a shock as felt at some particular locality, our ideas
- nevertheless wanting in definiteness; and if we endeavour to compare
- one shock with another, as a whole, our want of exactness is augmented.
- We have seen that Palmieri’s seismograph indicates intensity by a
- certain number of degrees, which, to a certain extent, is a measure of
- the violence of the motion as indicated at a particular locality. The
- degrees, as before stated, refer to the height to which in consequence
- of the shaking, a certain quantity of mercury was washed in a tube,
- which is a function of the depth of mercury in the tube, and also of
- the duration of the disturbance.</p>
-
- <p>From this it seems possible that a very slow motion of small amplitude,
- continuing over a sufficient period of time, might, if it agreed with
- the period of the mercury, indicate an earthquake of many degrees of
- intensity, whilst residents in the neighbourhood might not have noticed
- the disturbance; and, on the other hand, a short but intense shock
- creating considerable destruction might have been recorded as of only a
- few degrees of intensity.</p>
-
- <p>Although objections like these might be raised to such a method of
- recording intensity, in practice it would appear that such results are
- not pronounced, and the indications of the instrument usually give us
- approximate indications of relative intensity.</p>
-
- <p>In writing about the Neapolitan earthquake of 1857, Mallet says that
- ‘area alone affords no test of seismic energy.’</p>
-
- <p>The area over which a shock is felt will depend not only upon the
- initial force of the disturbance, but also
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_79">79</span> upon the focal depth of
- a shock, the form and position of that focus, the duration of the
- disturbance, and the nature and arrangement of the materials which are
- shaken.</p>
-
- <p>From observations in Japan, it is clearly shown that massive mountain
- ranges exert a considerable influence upon the extension of seismal
- disturbances. On one side of a large range of mountains large cities
- might be laid in ruins, whilst on the other side the disturbance
- creating this destruction might not be noticed.</p>
-
- <p><em>Velocity and Acceleration of an Earth Particle.</em>—We now pass on to
- methods of determining the intensity of an earthquake which are less
- arbitrary than those which have just been discussed. These methods have
- already been discussed when speaking of artificial disturbances, where
- it was shown that the intensity of an earthquake as measured by its
- destructive effects greatly depended upon the suddenness with which the
- backward and forward motions of the ground were commenced or ended.</p>
-
- <p>Amongst the earlier investigators of seismic phenomena who observed
- that there existed a connection between the distance to which bodies
- had been projected during an earthquake and the suddenness or initial
- velocity with which the ground had been moved beneath them, was
- Professor Wenthrop of Cambridge, Massachusetts, who noted that bricks
- from his chimneys had, by the New England earthquake of 1755, been
- thrown thirty feet. From this and the known height of the chimney, he
- calculates that the bricks had been projected with an initial velocity
- of twenty-one feet per second.<a id="FNanchor_13" href="#Footnote_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a></p>
-
- <p>The calculations made by Mallet respecting the maximum velocity of
- an earth particle at the time of the Neapolitan earthquake in 1857
- depended upon the overthrow, projection, and fracture of bodies.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_80">80</span></p>
-
- <p>The principles which guided him in making the calculations will be
- understood from the following illustration.</p>
-
- <div class="figleft">
- <img src="images/i_p080.jpg" width="262" height="273" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 14.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>If a column, <span class="smcap">a b c d</span>, receive a shock or be suddenly moved in
- the direction of the arrow, the centre of gravity, <span class="smcap">g</span>, of this
- column will revolve round the edge, and tend to describe the path <span class="smcap">g o</span>.
- If it passes <span class="smcap">o</span>, the column will fall. The work done in
- such a case as this is equal to lifting the column through the height
- o <i>h</i>.</p>
-
- <p>If <span class="smcap">g a</span> = <i>a</i>, the angle <span class="smcap">g a</span> <i>h</i> = <i>ϕ</i>, and the
- weight of the body = <span class="smcap">w</span>, then the above work equals</p>
-
- <p class="center"><span class="smcap">w</span><i>a</i> (1 − cos <i>ϕ</i>).</p>
-
- <p>This must equal the work acquired—that is to say, the kinetic energy of
- rotation of the body, or</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- <span class="smcap">w</span><i>a</i> (1 − cos <i>ϕ</i>)&nbsp;=&nbsp;
- <span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">w</span><i>w</i><sup>2</sup><span class="smcap">k</span><sup>2</sup></sup>
- <span>/</span><sub>2 <i>g</i></sub></span>.
- </div>
-
- <p>Where <i>w</i> is the angular velocity of the body at starting, <span class="smcap">k</span>
- the radius of gyration round <span class="smcap">a</span>, and <i>g</i> the velocity acquired
- by a falling body in one second. Whence</p>
-
- <div class="center"><i>w</i><sup>2</sup> <span class="smcap">k</span><sup>2</sup> = 2 <i>ga</i> (1 − cos <i>ϕ</i>),</div>
-
- <p class="noindent">but <i>w</i>, the angular velocity, is equal to the statical couple applied,
- divided by the moment of inertia, or,</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- <i>w</i>&nbsp;=&nbsp;<span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">v</span><i>a</i> cos <i>ϕ</i></sup>
- <span>/</span><sub><span class="smcap">k</span><sup>2</sup></sub></span>,
- </div>
-
- <p class="noindent">squaring and substituting</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- <span class="smcap">v</span><sup>2</sup>&nbsp;=&nbsp;2<i>g</i>&nbsp;×&nbsp;
- <span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">k</span><sup>2</sup></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>a</i></sub></span>&nbsp;×&nbsp;
- <span class="frac"><sup>1 − cos <i>ϕ</i></sup><span>/</span><sub>cos<sup>2</sup> <i>ϕ</i></sub></span>,
- </div>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_81">81</span></p>
-
- <p class="noindent">and since the length of the corresponding pendulum is <i>l</i>&nbsp;=&nbsp;
- <span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">k</span><sup>2</sup></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>a</i></sub></span>,
- </p>
-
- <div class="center">
- <span class="smcap">v</span><sup>2</sup>&nbsp;= 2<i>gl</i>&nbsp;×&nbsp;<span class="frac"><sup>1 − cos <i>ϕ</i></sup>
- <span>/</span><sub>cos<sup>2</sup> <i>ϕ</i></sub></span>,
- </div>
-
- <p>To apply this to any given case we must find the value of <i>l</i> or of&nbsp;
- <span class="frac"><sup><span class="smcap">k</span><sup>2</sup></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>a</i></sub></span>.
- </p>
-
- <p>Mallet finds these values for the cube, solid and hollow rectangular
- parallelopipeds, solid and hollow cylinders, &amp;c. In these formulæ we
- have a direct connection between the dimensions and form of a body and
- the velocity with which the ground must move beneath it to cause its
- overthrow.</p>
-
- <div class="figright">
- <img src="images/i_p081.jpg" width="221" height="212" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 15.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>Not only is the case discussed for horizontal forces, but also for
- forces acting obliquely. Similar reasonings are applied to the
- productions of fractures in walls, but as there is uncertainty in our
- knowledge of the co-efficient of force necessary to produce fracture
- <em>through joints across</em> beds of masonry, the deductions ought not to
- be applied as the measures of velocity. Where the fractures occur at
- the base or in horizontal planes, or in those of the continuous beds of
- the masonry, or through homogeneous bodies, the uncertainty is not so
- great, and for cases like these Mallet gives several illustrations. The
- distance to which bodies had been projected, as, for example, ornaments
- from the tops of pedestals, coping-stones from the edges of roofs, were
- also used as means of determining the angle at which the shock had
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_82">82</span>
- emerged, or, if this be known, for determining the velocity.</p>
-
- <p>Thus by a shock in the direction <span class="smcap">o c</span>, a ball, <span class="smcap">a</span>,
- on the top of a pedestal would describe a trajectory to the point
- <span class="smcap">c</span>. Let the angle which <span class="smcap">o c</span> makes with the horizon be
- <i>e</i>, the vertical height through which the ball has fallen be <i>b</i>, and
- the horizontal distance of projection be <i>a</i>; then</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- <i>b</i>&nbsp;=&nbsp;<i>a</i> tan <i>e</i> +
- <span class="frac"><sup><i>a</i><sup>2</sup></sup>
- <span>/</span><sub>4<span class="smcap">h</span> cos<sup>2</sup> <i>e</i></sub></span>,
- </div>
-
- <p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">h</span> being the height due to the velocity of projection. Whence</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- Tan <i>e</i>&nbsp;=&nbsp;
- <span class="frac"><sup>2<span class="smcap">h</span> ± √<span class="sqrt">4<span class="smcap">h</span>(<span class="smcap">h</span> + <i>b</i>) − <i>a</i><sup>2</sup></span></sup>
- <span>/</span><sub><i>a</i></sub></span>
- </div>
-
- <div class="center mt1">
- <span class="smcap">v</span><sup>2</sup>&nbsp;=&nbsp;
- <span class="frac"><sup><i>a</i><sup>2</sup> <i>g</i></sup>
- <span>/</span><sub>2 cos<sup>2</sup> <i>e</i> (<i>b</i> − <i>a</i> tan <i>e</i>)</sub></span>.
- </div>
-
- <p>For the back motion or subnormal wave in the direction <span class="smcap">c o</span>,</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- Tan <i>e</i>&nbsp;=&nbsp;
- <span class="frac"><sup>2<span class="smcap">h</span> ± √<span class="sqrt">4<span class="smcap">h</span>(<span class="smcap">h</span> + <i>b</i>) − <i>a</i><sup>2</sup></span></sup>
- <span>/</span><sub><i>a</i></sub></span>
- </div>
-
- <div class="center mt1">
- <span class="smcap">v</span><sup>2</sup>&nbsp;=&nbsp;
- <span class="frac"><sup><i>a</i><sup>2</sup> <i>g</i></sup>
- <span>/</span><sub>2 cos<sup>2</sup> <i>e</i> (<i>b</i> + <i>a</i> tan <i>e</i>)</sub></span>.
- </div>
-
- <p>A serious error which may enter into calculations of this description
- when practically applied has been pointed out when speaking of columns
- as seismometers. It was then shown that such bodies before being
- overthrown may often be caused to rock, and therefore that their final
- overthrow may not have any direct connection with the impulse of the
- succeeding shock.</p>
-
- <p>Another point to which attention must be drawn respecting the above
- calculations is that if there was no friction or adherence between the
- projected body and its<span class="pagenum" id="Page_83">83</span>
- pedestal, in consequence of its inertia it
- would be left behind by the forward motion of the shock, and simply
- drop at the foot of its support. In the case of frictional adherence it
- would be carried forward by the velocity acquired before this adherence
- was broken, and thrown in a direction <em>opposite</em> to that given in the
- figure—that is to say, in the direction of the
- shock.<a id="FNanchor_14" href="#Footnote_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>The Absolute Intensity of the Force exerted by an Earthquake.</em>—No
- doubt it has occurred to many who have experienced an earthquake
- that the power which gave birth to such a disturbance must have been
- enormously great. The estimates which we shall make of the absolute
- amount of energy represented by an earthquake cannot, on account of the
- nature of the factors with which we deal, be regarded as accurate. They
- may, however, be of assistance in forming estimates of quantities about
- which we have at present no conception. One method of obtaining the
- result we seek is that which was employed by Mallet in his calculations
- respecting the Neapolitan earthquake. Although disbelieving in the
- general increment of temperature as we descend in the earth at an
- average rate of 1° F. for every fifty or sixty feet of descent, for
- want of better means. Mallet assumes this law to be true, and, knowing
- from a variety of observations the depth of various parts of the cavity
- from which the disturbance sprang, he calculates the temperatures of
- this cavity in various parts as due to its depth beneath the surface.
- Next, it is assumed that steam was suddenly admitted into this cavity,
- which might exert the greatest possible pressure due to the maximum
- temperature. This was calculated as being about 684 atmospheres.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_84">84</span></p>
-
- <p>Next, he determined the column of limestone necessary to balance such a
- pressure, which is about 8,550 feet in height. As the least thickness
- of strata above this cavity was 16,700 feet, the pressure of 684
- atmospheres was not sufficient to blow away its cover, but if suddenly
- admitted or generated in the cavity it might have produced the wave of
- impulse by the sudden compression of the walls of the cavity.</p>
-
- <p>The pressure of 684 atmospheres is equivalent to about 4·58 tons on
- the square inch, and, as the total area of the walls of the cavity is
- calculated at twenty-seven square miles, the total accumulated pressure
- would be more than 640,528 millions of tons. Mallet, however, shows
- that it is probable that the temperature of the focal cavity was much
- greater than that due to the hypogeal increment, and that therefore the
- pressure may have been greater.</p>
-
- <p>The capability of producing the earthquake impulse, however, depends
- on the <em>suddenness</em> with which the steam is flashed off. According
- to the experiments of Boutigny and others, Mallet tells us that the
- most sudden production of steam would take place at a temperature of
- 500°-550° C., which is but a few degrees below that calculated for the
- mean focal depth.</p>
-
- <p>Assuming the above calculated pressure to be true, and knowing the
- co-efficient of compression of the materials on which it acted, the
- volume of the wave at a given moment near the instant of starting—that
- is, at the focus—can be calculated, and from this the wave amplitude on
- reaching the surface may be deduced.</p>
-
- <p>Proceeding backwards, if we have observed the wave amplitude,
- calculated the depth of the focus, and know the co-efficient of
- expansion, then the total compression
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_85">85</span> may be calculated and the
- temperature due to the pressure producing this may be arrived at. In
- this way earthquakes may be used as a means of calculating subterranean
- temperature at depths that can never be attained experimentally.</p>
-
- <p>A method of proceeding which is probably more definite than that
- adopted by Mallet would be the application of the method indicated when
- speaking of the intensity of artificial disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>If for a given earthquake the origin of which is known we have
- determined by seismographs the mean acceleration of an earth particle
- at two or more stations at different distances from that origin, we are
- enabled to construct a curve of intensity the area between which and
- its asymptotes was shown to be a measure of the total intensity of the
- shock. Comparing this area with that of a unit disturbance produced,
- say, by the explosion of a pound of dynamite, one may approximately
- calculate in terms of this unit the initial intensity of the earthquake.</p>
-
- <p><em>Radiation of an Earthquake.</em>—The tremors preceding the more violent
- movements of an earthquake may be due, as Mallet has suggested,<a id="FNanchor_15" href="#Footnote_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a>
- to the free surface waves reaching a distant point before the direct
- vibrations.</p>
-
- <p>The fact that earth vibrations produced by striking a blow on or near
- the surface of the ground are wholly obliterated in reaching a cutting
- or valley, there being no underground waves of distortion to crop up
- on the opposite side of the valley, indicates that the disturbance is
- one that travels on the surface; the same fact is illustrated when we
- endeavour to transmit vibrations through the side of a hill into a
- tunnel.</p>
-
- <p>In the tunnel, although the distance may be small,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_86">86</span>no sensible effects
- are produced, whilst the same disturbance may be recorded at a long
- distance from its origin on the surface of the ground outside the
- tunnel.</p>
-
- <p>Lastly, we may refer to the experiences of miners underground.</p>
-
- <p>Occasionally it has happened that miners when deep underground, as in
- the Marienberg in the Saxon Erzgebirge, have felt shocks which have not
- been noticed on the surface. These observations are rare, and it is
- possible that they may be explained by the caving in of subterranean
- excavations.</p>
-
- <p>The usual experience is, that if a shock is felt underground it is also
- felt on the surface, as for example in the lead mines in Derbyshire at
- the time of the Lisbon disturbance (1755).</p>
-
- <p>The most frequent observation, however, is that a shock may be felt on
- the surface while it is not remarked by the miners beneath the surface,
- as at Fahlun and Presburg in November, 1823.</p>
-
- <p>At the Comstock Lode in Colorado about twelve years ago many
- earthquakes were felt. On one particular day twenty-four were counted.
- Superintendent Charles Foreman told the author when he visited Virginia
- City in 1882, that special observations were made to determine whether
- these shocks were felt as severely deep down in the mines as on the
- surface, where they were on the verge of being destructive. The
- universal testimony of many observers was that in most cases they were
- not felt at all underground, and when a shock was felt it was extremely
- feeble. At Takashima Colliery, in Japan, it is seldom that shocks are
- felt underground.</p>
-
- <p>The explanation of these latter observations appears to be either
- that, in consequence of a smaller amplitude
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_87">87</span> of motion in the solid
- rocks beneath the surface as compared with the extent of motion on
- the surface, the disturbances are passed by unnoticed, or else the
- disturbance is, at a distance from its origin, practically confined to
- the surface.</p>
-
- <p><em>Velocity of Propagation of an Earthquake.</em>—Although many have written
- upon earthquakes and have endeavoured to give to us the velocity with
- which they were propagated, the subject is one about which we have as
- yet but little exact information.</p>
-
- <p>The importance of this branch of investigation is undoubtedly great.
- By knowing the velocity with which an earthquake has travelled in
- various directions we are assisted in determining the locality of
- its origin; we may possibly make important deductions respecting the
- nature of the medium through which it has passed; perhaps also we
- may learn something regarding the intensity of the disturbance which
- created the earthquake. In the Report of the British Association for
- 1851 Mallet gives the table on next page, in which are placed together
- the approximate rates of transit of shocks of several earthquakes
- which he discusses. Some of these, it will be observed, are records of
- disturbances which must have passed through or across the bed of the
- ocean.</p>
-
- <p>In Mallet’s British Association Report for 1858, he gives data compiled
- by Mr. David Milne<a id="FNanchor_16" href="#Footnote_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> respecting the Lisbon earthquakes of 1755 and
- 1761, from which data the tables of velocities <a href="#Page_89">(p. 89)</a> have been
- calculated, omitting those which Mr. Mallet has marked as uncertain.</p>
-
- <p>The distances are marked in degrees of seventy English miles each, and
- the time is reduced to Lisbon time.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_88">88</span></p>
-
- <table id="propogation" class="collapse" summary="Propogation velocity">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">Occasion and Place</th>
- <th class="ball">Approx. rate in feet per second</th>
- <th class="ball">Formation constituting Range on surface as far as known or conjectured</th>
- <th class="ball">Authority</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Rev. John Mitchell’s guesses from the Lisbon earthquakes</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,760</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Sea bottom, probably on slates, secondary and crystalline rocks</td>
- <td class="tdc br">Mitchell</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Von Humboldt’s guesses from South America</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,760 to 2,464</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">From observations in various South American rocks in great part volcanic</td>
- <td class="tdc br">Humboldt</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc bl br pt2"><i>Lisbon Earthquake of 1761.</i></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Lisbon to Corunna</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,994</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Transition, carboniferous and granitoid</td>
- <td class="tdc br">‘Annual Register’</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Lisbon to Cork</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5,228</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Transition, carboniferous crystalline slates and granitoid, probably, under sea bottom</td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Lisbon to Santa Cruz</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3,261</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">The same with many alterations</td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc bl br pt2"><i>Antilles.</i></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Pointe à Pitre to Cayenne (doubtful)</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>6,586</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Probably volcanic rocks under sea bottom</td>
- <td class="tdc br">Stier and Perrey’s memorandum, Dijon</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc bl br pt2"><i>India.</i></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Cutch to Calcutta, 1819</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,173</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Alluvial, secondary, granitoid and later igneous rocks</td>
- <td class="tdc br">‘Royal Asiatic Journal’</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">India, Nepauls, and basin of the Ganges, 1834:&mdash;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Rungpur to Arrah</td>
- <td class="tdr1 br" rowspan="4">
- <table summary="Propogation sub-table">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr1">
- <div>
- 2,314<br />
- 3,520<br />
- 990<br />
- 1,210
- </div>
- </td>
- <td class="x400">}</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
- </td>
- <td class="tdl br" rowspan="4">Deep alluvia, with occasional transition, carboniferous, granitoid, and later igneous rocks</td>
- <td class="tdc br" rowspan="4">‘Royal Asiatic Journal’</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Monghyr to Gorackpur</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Rungpur to Monghyr</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Rungpur to Calcutta</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br bb">Ships ‘Rambler’ and ‘Millwood,’ at sea, 1851; between lat. 16° 30′ N.L., 54° 30′ W., and lat. 23° 30′ N.L., 58° 0′ W.</td>
- <td class="tdr br bb"><div>1,056</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br bb">Sea bottom resting on unknown rock</td>
- <td class="tdc br bb">‘Nautical Magazine’</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_89">89</span></p>
-
- <p class="center mt2"><span class="smcap">The Lisbon Earthquake on November 1, 1755.</span></p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Propogation velocity Lisbon 1755">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">Localities</th>
- <th class="ball" colspan="2">Moment observed of shock</th>
- <th class="ball" colspan="2">Distance from presumed origin</th>
- <th class="ball">Velocity in feet per second</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>h.</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>m.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>°</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>′</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Presumed focus of shock, lat. 30°, long. 11° W.</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>23</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br" colspan="2">&mdash;</td>
- <td class="tdc br">&mdash;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">A ship at sea in lat. 38°, long. 10° 47′ W.</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>24</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>3,091</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Colares</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,325</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Lisbon</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>32</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,030</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Oporto</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>38</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,030</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Ayamonte</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>50</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>916</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Cadiz</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>48</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,236</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Tangier and Tetuan</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>46</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,478</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Madrid</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>43</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,855</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Funchal</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,382</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Portsmouth</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,431</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Havre</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>23</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,339</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Reading</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,304</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Yarmouth</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>42</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>1,174</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Amsterdam</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>17</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>2,444</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br bb">Loch Ness</td>
- <td class="tdr bb"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br bb"><div>42</div></td>
- <td class="tdr bb"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br bb"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br bb"><div>1,409</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p class="center mt2"><span class="smcap">The Lisbon Earthquake of March 31, 1761.</span><a
- id="FNanchor_17" href="#Footnote_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a></p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Propogation velocity Lisbon 1761">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">Locality</th>
- <th class="ball" colspan="2">Moment observed of shock</th>
- <th class="ball" colspan="2">Distance from presumed origin</th>
- <th class="ball">Velocity in feet per second</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>h.</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>m.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>°</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>′</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Presumed focus, lat. 43°, long. 11° W.</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>51</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br" colspan="2">&mdash;</td>
- <td class="tdc br">&mdash;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Ship at sea in lat. 43°, many leagues from coast of Portugal</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>52</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>3,091</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Ship in lat. 44° 8′ and about 80 leagues from coast</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>54</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>45</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>3,607</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Corunna</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>51</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>2,576</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Ship lat. 44° 8′ and 80 leagues NNW. of Cape Finisterre</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>58</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>3,091</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Lisbon</td>
- <td class="tdc br" colspan="2">noon</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>3,091</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Madeira</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br"><div>4,122</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br bb">Cork</td>
- <td class="tdr bb"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br bb"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdr bb"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br bb"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrx br bb"><div>2,937</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>These tables, owing to the nature of the materials
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_90">90</span>which Mallet had at
- his disposal, are but rude approximations to the truth. Two interesting
- facts are, however, observable: the first being that the velocities
- for the earthquake of 1761 are much higher than those obtained for the
- earthquake of 1755; and, secondly, that in both cases the velocities as
- determined from the observations of ships at sea closely approximate
- to each other, in all cases being nearly the same as that with which a
- sound wave would travel through water.</p>
-
- <p>The great differences in transit velocity obtained for different
- earthquakes is a point worthy of attention.</p>
-
- <p>Seebach’s velocity is a <em>true</em> transit velocity, and its determination
- is dependent on the assumption that the shock radiated from the
- <em>centrum</em> and not from the <em>epicentrum</em>, Seebach’s method is explained
- when speaking about the determination of origins.</p>
-
- <p>Some interesting observations on the velocity with which the earthquake
- of October 7, 1874, was propagated, are given by M. S. di Rossi.<a id="FNanchor_18" href="#Footnote_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a></p>
-
- <p>One assumption is that the disturbance radiated from an origin
- to surrounding points of observation, whilst another is that the
- disturbance followed natural fractures, the direction of which is
- derived from the crest of certain mountain ranges. These velocities are
- as follows, Maradi being at or near the origin of the disturbance:—</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Rossi's velocity results">
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2" class="tdc ball">Velocity in feet per second with direct radiation</td>
- <td colspan="2" class="tdc ball">Velocity in feet per second by propagation along mountain chains</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Modigliana</td>
- <td class="tdr br">820</td>
- <td class="tdl">By the Valley of Marenzo</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,080</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Bologna</td>
- <td class="tdr br">656</td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Saveno</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,080</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Forli</td>
- <td class="tdr br">874</td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Montone</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,080</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl vm bl">Modena</td>
- <td class="tdr vm br">518</td>
- <td class="tdl vm">&nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Panaro</td>
- <td class="tdr0 pr0 br">
- <div>
- <table summary="maradi1" class="mr1">
- <tr>
- <td rowspan="2" class="tdr0 pr0"><div class="x200">{</div></td>
- <td class="tdr0 pr1"><div>1,080</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr0 pr1"><div>984</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
- </div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Firenze</td>
- <td class="tdr br">273</td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Sieve</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>540</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl bb">Compiobbi</td>
- <td class="tdr br bb">328</td>
- <td class="tdl bb">&nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="tdr br bb"><div>540</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_91">91</span></p>
- <p>Another set of interesting results are those of P. Serpieri on the
- earthquake of March 12, 1873. The curious manner in which this shock
- radiated is described in the chapter on the Geographical Distribution
- of Earthquakes (see <a href="#Page_231">p. 231</a>). Two large areas appear to have been
- almost simultaneously struck, so that, there being no time for elastic
- yielding, the velocities calculated between places situated on either
- of the areas are exceedingly great.<a id="FNanchor_19" href="#Footnote_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a></p>
-
- <table summary="Serpieri's velocity results">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">From Ragusa to Venice the velocity was</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>2,734</div></td>
- <td class="tdl">feet per second</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Spoleto&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>4,101</div></td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;„ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Perugia to Orvieto&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>601</div></td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „ &nbsp; Ancona</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1,640</div></td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „ &nbsp; Rome</td>
- <td class="tdr0 pr0">
- <div>
- <table summary="Serpieri sub-table">
- <tr>
- <td rowspan="2" class="tdr0 pr0"><span class="x200">{</span></td>
- <td class="tdr0 pr0"><div>1,640</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr0 pr0"><div>or, 2,186</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
- </div>
- </td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>The following are examples of approximate earthquake velocities which
- have been determined in Japan.</p>
-
- <p><em>The Tokio Earthquake of October 25, 1881.</em>—From records respecting
- this earthquake it appears to have been felt over the whole of Yezo
- and the northern and eastern coast of Nipon, a little farther south
- than Tokio. It was severest at Nemuro and Hakodate, and at the former
- place a little damage was done. From these facts, together with the
- indications of instruments recording direction of movement and a
- general inspection of the time records, it seems that the disturbance
- must have originated beneath the sea on the east coast of Yezo at a
- very long distance to the north-east of Tokio, from which place it
- passed in a practically direct line on to Yokohama.</p>
-
- <p>As the disturbance was felt at Yokohama twenty-one seconds later than
- at Tokio, and the distances between these two places is about sixteen
- geographical miles, for this portion of its course the disturbance must
- have travelled at a rate of at least 4,300 <em>feet per second</em>. If
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_92">92</span>we
- assume that the shock, after having reached Hakodate, travelled on at
- the same rate as it did between Tokio and Yokohama in order to reach
- Saporo, where the shaking was felt eighteen seconds after Hakodate,
- it must have had about thirteen geographical miles to travel after
- Hakodate was shaken before Saporo felt its effect.</p>
-
- <p>Drawing from Hakodate a tangent to the eastern side of a circle of
- thirteen miles radius described round Saporo, the origin of the
- disturbance must be on the line bisecting this tangent at right angles.
- As it also lies on a line drawn through Tokio and Yokohama, it lies in
- a position about 41 N. lat. and 144° 15′ E. long., which is a position
- somewhat nearer to Nemuro than Hakodate, as we should anticipate. If
- this be taken as approximately indicating the origin, then the shock,
- after reaching Hakodate from the Hakodate <em>homoseist</em>, travelled about
- 218 miles to reach Tokio in 128 seconds, which gives a <em>velocity of
- 10,219 feet per second</em>.</p>
-
- <p>The method here followed is equivalent to that of the hyperbola and one
- direction (see <a href="#Page_204">p. 204</a>). The hyperbola is described on the assumption
- that the velocity deduced from the time taken to travel between Tokio
- and Yokohama is correct, and also that the earth waves travelled with
- approximately the same velocity in the vicinity of Saporo as near
- Tokio. The probability, however, is that they travelled more quickly.
- If this be so, then the origin is thrown somewhat to the south-east and
- the velocity between the Hakodate homoseist and Tokio reduced. Thus,
- if the velocity in the Saporo district be double that observed in the
- Tokio district, the origin is shifted about twenty-eight miles to the
- south-west, and the last-mentioned velocity is reduced to about 9,000
- feet per second.</p>
-
- <p>If we work by the method of circles, and assume the velocity to have
- been constant in all directions, then this
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_93">93</span> velocity must have been
- about 6,000 feet per second. If we assume that the indications of
- direction obtained from seismographs and other sources give to us by
- this intersection a proper origin, the velocity in some directions may
- have been as much as 17,000 feet per second.</p>
-
- <p>An origin thus determined, or even if determined by the method of
- circles, is in discord with the fact that places like Nemuro, in the
- north-east of Yezo, were nearer to the origin than any of the other
- places which have been mentioned.</p>
-
- <p>The conclusion which we are therefore led to with regard to this shock,
- assuming of course that the time observations are tolerably correct,
- is that the velocity of propagation was variable, being greater when
- measured between points near to the origin than between points at a
- distance. The velocities estimated vary between 4,000 and 9,000 feet
- per second.</p>
-
- <p>In the case of the earthquake which has just been discussed, we have
- an example of a disturbance which must have passed between Tokio and
- Yokohama in what was almost a straight line from the origin. As this
- direction ought to give the maximum time of transit if all earthquakes
- are propagated with the same velocity, the following table is given of
- the interval between the time of observation of several shocks at these
- two stations:—</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Yokohama to Tokio transit interval">
- <tr>
- <th><span class="smcap">From Yokohama to Tokio.</span></th>
- <th><span class="smcap">From Tokio to Yokohama.</span></th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl br">1880 December 20th&nbsp; &nbsp; 36 seconds</td>
- <td>1882 October 25th&nbsp; 21 seconds</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl br">1881 January 7th&nbsp; &nbsp; 14–31&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdl">1883 February 6th&nbsp; &nbsp;23&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl br">&nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; March&nbsp; 8th&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;60&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; March 1&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 53&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl br">&nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 17th.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;66&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 63&nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl br">&nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; November 15th&nbsp; &nbsp; 31&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 8th &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 27&nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl br">1882 February 16th&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 22&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp;„&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; 11th&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;26&nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>As these are observations which have been made with the assistance of a
- telegraphic signal daily employed to
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_94">94</span> correct and rate the clocks from
- which the observations were obtained, they may be regarded as being
- tolerably, correct.</p>
-
- <p>The disturbance of February 6, the two shocks of March 1, appear, like
- that of October 25, to have passed in almost a direct line from an
- origin in the N.N.E, through Tokio on to Yokohama. Their velocities of
- propagation as calculated from the above intervals are approximately
- 3,900, 1,900, and 1,400 feet per second. The shock of February 16
- appears to have had its origin near to a point in Yedo Bay about eight
- miles east of Yokohama. Assuming this to be the case, the shock between
- the Yokohama homoseist and Tokio travelled at the rate of 2,454 feet
- per second, but between the Tokio homoseist and Chiba at the rate
- of 750 feet per second; that is to say, the velocity of propagation
- rapidly decreased as the disturbance spread outwards.</p>
-
- <p>At Yokohama it was recorded at 5.31.54, at Tokio at 5.32.16, and at
- Chiba at 5.33.48. These times are given in Tokio mean time.</p>
-
- <p>The shock of March 11, which was recorded at Tokio at 7.51.22
- <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> and at Yokohama at 7.51.33 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span>, appears, from
- the indications of instruments which were exceptionally definite in
- their records, to have originated in the N.E. corner of Yedo Bay,
- about nineteen miles S.S.W. from Chiba. This shock was rather severe,
- fracturing several chimneys. From the Tokio homoseist it appears to
- have travelled on to Yokohama at the rate of about 2,200 feet per
- second. Assuming these observations to be <em>approximately</em> accurate, if
- we take them with the records of previous observers they lead us to the
- following conclusions:—</p>
-
- <p>1. Different earthquakes, although they may travel across the same
- country, have very variable velocities,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_95">95</span> varying between several
- hundreds and several thousands of feet per second.</p>
-
- <p>2. The same earthquake travels more quickly across districts near to
- its origin than it does across districts which are far removed.</p>
-
- <p>3. The greater the intensity of the shock the greater is the velocity.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_VI">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_96">96</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER VI.<br />
- <span class="subhead">EFFECTS PRODUCED BY EARTHQUAKES UPON BUILDINGS.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- The destruction of buildings is not irregular—Cracks in
- buildings—Buildings in Tokio—Relation of destruction to
- earthquake motion—Measurement of relative motion of parts of a
- building shaken by an earthquake—Prevention of cracks—Direction
- of cracks—The pitch of roofs—Relative position of openings in a
- wall—The last house in a row—The swing of buildings—Principle of
- relative vibrational periods.</div>
-
- <p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">The</span> subject of this
- chapter is, from a practical point of view, one
- of the most important with which a seismologist has to deal. We
- cannot prevent the occurrence of earthquakes, and unless we avoid
- earthquake-shaken regions, we have not the means of escaping from
- them. What we can do, however, is in some degree to protect ourselves.
- By studying the effects produced by earthquakes upon buildings of
- different construction and variously situated, we are taught how to
- avoid or at least to mitigate calamities which, in certain regions of
- the world, are continually repeated. The subject is an extensive one,
- and what is here said about it must be regarded only as a contribution
- to the work of future writers who may give it the attention it
- deservedly requires.</p>
-
- <p><em>The Destruction produced by Earthquakes is not irregular.</em>—If we
- were suddenly placed amongst the ruins of a large city which had
- been shattered by an earthquake, it is doubtful whether we should at
- once<span class="pagenum" id="Page_97">97</span>
- recognise any law as to the relative position of the masses of
- <i xml:lang="fr">débris</i> and the general destruction with which we are surrounded.
- The results of observation have, however, shown us that, amongst the
- apparently chaotic ruin produced by earthquakes, there is in many cases
- more or less law governing the position of bodies which have fallen,
- the direction and position of cracks in walls, and the various other
- phenomena which result from such destructive disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>Mallet, at the commencement of his first volume, describing the
- Neapolitan earthquake of 1857, discusses the general effect produced by
- various shocks upon differently constructed buildings. First he shows
- that, if we have a rectangular building, the walls at right angles to
- the shock will be more likely to be overthrown than those which are
- parallel to it. Experience teaches a similar lesson. Thus Darwin, when
- speaking of the earthquake at Concepcion in 1835,<a id="FNanchor_20"
- href="#Footnote_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> tells us that
- the town was built in the usual Spanish fashion, with all the streets
- running at right angles to each other. One set ranged S.W. by W. and
- N.E. by E. and the other N.W. by N. and S.E. by S. The walls in the
- former direction certainly stood better than those in the latter. The
- undulations came from the S.W.</p>
-
- <p>In Caraccas it is said that every house has its <i xml:lang="es">laga securo</i>, or safe
- side, where the inhabitants place their fragile property. This <i xml:lang="es">laga
- securo</i> is the north side, and it was chosen because about two out of
- every three destructive shocks traversed the city from west to east,
- so that the walls in these sides of a building have been stricken
- broadside on.<a id="FNanchor_21" href="#Footnote_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a></p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_98">98</span></p>
-
- <p><em>Cracks in Buildings.</em>—Results like the above come from destructive
- earthquakes rather than from movements such as those we have to deal
- with ordinarily. When a building is subjected to a slight movement
- it is assumed that the walls at right angles to the direction of the
- shock move backwards and forwards as a whole, and there is little or
- no tendency for them to be fractured at their weaker parts, these
- weaker parts being those over the various openings. The walls, however,
- which are parallel to the direction of the movement are, so to speak,
- extended and contracted along their length, and in consequence they may
- be expected to give way over the various openings. This tendency for
- extension and contraction of a wall along its length may be supposed,
- for instance, to be due to the different portions of a wall, owing to
- differences in dimensions and elasticity, having different periods of
- natural vibration, or possibly for two portions of a long line of wall
- to be simultaneously affected by portions of waves in different phases.</p>
-
- <p>As an illustration of the giving way of a building in the manner here
- suggested we may take the case of a large brick structure which was
- recently being erected in Tokio. This building, at the time of the
- earthquake, was only some fourteen or fifteen feet above the surface
- of the ground. The length of the building stretched from N.W. to S.E.,
- and it was intersected by many walls at right angles to this direction.
- Through all the walls of this building there were many arched openings.
- In the central part of the transverse walls, which walls were fully
- five feet in thickness, the arches which joined them together were 4
- feet 4 inches in thickness. The arches therefore formed a comparatively
- lightly constructed link between heavy masses of brickwork.</p>
-
- <p>On March 3, 1879, at 4.43 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span>, an earthquake was
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_99">99</span> felt
- throughout Tokio, the strength of which, as judged by our feelings,
- was above that of an average shock. As registered by one of Palmieri’s
- instruments, it had a direction S.S.W. to N.N.E. and an intensity of
- 11°. On the same day there were several smaller shocks having the same
- direction, and these were succeeded by others on the 9th of the month.</p>
-
- <p>Immediately after these shakings it was discovered that almost every
- arch in the internal walls of the building here referred to had been
- cracked across the crown in a direction about N. 40° W. All the
- other arches of the building, of which there were a great number in
- walls at right angles to the direction of the shock, were found not
- to have sustained any injury. To this statement, however, there was
- one exception, which was subsequently proved to have been due to a
- settlement taking place.</p>
-
- <p>After examining these cracks the only cause to which they could be
- attributed was the series of shakings which they had just experienced.
- It seemed as if the heavy walls right and left of the arches had been
- in vibration without synchronism in their periods, and as a consequence
- the arches which connected them had been torn asunder.</p>
-
- <p>Although the time at which the cracks were formed and the peculiar
- positions in which they were only to be found pointed distinctly to
- their origin, to be certain that they were not due to settlement of the
- foundations, horizontal lines were ruled upon the brickwork and from
- time to time subsequently observed.</p>
-
- <p>The points to which the various cracks extended were also marked and
- observed. Beneath the walls as foundations there were beds of concrete
- about three feet thick and about ten feet in width. These had been
- under the pressure of the partially built walls for two years before
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_100">100</span>
- the arches had been put in. As these foundations were unusually strong,
- being intended to carry so very much greater weight than that to which
- they had been subjected, if any settlement had been detected it would
- have been a matter of surprise.</p>
-
- <p>Some weeks after the formation of these cracks it was observed that
- they gradually closed. This was probably due to the gradual falling
- inwards of the two broken portions of the arch, their position when
- open being one of instability.</p>
-
- <div class="figleft">
- <img src="images/i_p100.jpg" width="195" height="296" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 16.</span>—Cracks in a corner house,<br />Belluno, June 29, 1873
- (Bittner).</div>
- </div>
-
- <p>Had this building been more complete at the time of the shock, and
- the heavy walls been tied together at higher points, although the
- archways would have been points of weakness, it is quite possible
- that fracture would not have taken place. This illustration shows us
- that when a building is shaken in a definite direction there will be
- some rule as to the positions in which fractures occur. As another
- example, we may take the observations of Alexander Bittner upon the
- buildings of Belluno after the shock of June 29, 1873 (see Beiträge
- zur Kenntniss des Erdbebens von Belluno am 29 Juni, 1873, p. 40. Von
- Alexander Bittner. Aus dem LXIX. Bande der Sitzungsb. der K. Akad. der
- Wissensch., II. Abth., April-Heft. Jahrg. 1874).</p>
-
- <p>Speaking generally, he remarks that ‘Houses similarly situated have
- suffered in corresponding walls and corners in a similar manner. In
- Belluno there is a certain kind of damage which is repeated everywhere,
- making a peculiar<span class="pagenum" id="Page_101">101</span>
- system of splits in the S.W. and N.E. corners of the
- houses.’ This is well shown in the accompanying sketch, which evidently
- illustrates the effect of a shock oblique to the direction of two walls
- at right angles to each other.</p>
-
- <div class="figright">
- <img src="images/i_p101.jpg" width="345" height="268" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 17.</span>—Brick buildings<br />in Tokio, showing
- fractures.</div>
- </div>
-
- <p><em>Buildings in Tokio.</em>—For the purpose of finding out what has been the
- effect produced by earthquakes upon the buildings of Tokio, and at
- the same time for ascertaining whether blocks of buildings ranging in
- different directions suffered to the same extent, the author examined,
- in company with Mr. Josiah Conder, a large number of foreign-built
- houses in the district of the Ginza. The chief reason for choosing
- this was because it was the only district where a large number of
- <em>similar</em> buildings could be found. By examining houses or buildings of
- different constructions, the effects produced upon them by earthquakes
- are very often likely to show so many differences that it becomes
- almost an impossibility to determine what the general effect has
- been—unsymmetrical construction involving unsymmetrical ruin.</p>
-
- <p>A number of similarly constructed buildings in one locality may be
- regarded as a number of seismographs, the effect upon any one of them
- being judged of by the average of the general effect which has been
- produced upon the whole. The general form of two of these houses
- which were examined is shown in fig. 17. In this figure
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_102">102</span> the general
- character of the fractures which have been produced can also be seen.
- The houses are built of brick, and are in many cases faced with a thin
- coat of white plaster. Projecting from the level of the upper floor
- there is a balcony fronted by a low balustrade. This is supported by
- small beams which at their outer extremity are carried on a row of
- cylindrical columns. This forms a covered way in front of each row of
- houses. The roofs are covered with thick tiles. It will be observed
- that the arches of the upper windows spring <em>sharply</em> from their
- abutments, and at their crown they carry a heavy key-stone. The lower
- openings, which have a span of 9 feet, have evidently been constructed
- in imitation of the open front of an ordinary Japanese house. These
- archways curve out <em>gently</em> from their abutments. The outside walls
- have a thickness of 13½ inches.</p>
-
- <p>The results obtained from a careful examination of 174 houses in
- streets running N.E. and 156 houses in streets running N.W., all of
- these houses being similar, were as follows:—</p>
-
- <p>1. In the upper windows nearly all the cracks ran from the springing,
- which formed an angle with the abutment.</p>
-
- <p>2. In the lower arches, which <em>curved</em> into the abutments, not a single
- crack was observed at the springway. The cracks in these arches were
- near the crown, where beams projected to carry the balcony. In many
- instances the cracks proceeded from such beams, even if there were
- no arch beneath. That cracks should occur in peculiar positions, as
- is here indicated, is shown in the illustrations which accompany the
- accounts of many earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>3. The houses which were most cracked were in the streets running
- parallel to the direction in which the greater number and most powerful
- set of shocks cross the city.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_103">103</span></p>
-
- <p>The results showed that, in order to avoid the effects of small shocks,
- all walls containing principal openings should be placed as nearly
- as possible at right angles to the direction in which the shocks of
- the districts usually travel. The blank walls, or those containing
- unimportant openings, would then be parallel to the direction of the
- shocks—that is, presuming our building to be made up of two sets of
- walls at right angles to each other.</p>
-
- <p>Another point of importance would be to build archways <em>curving</em> into
- the supporting buttresses; the archways over doors and windows which we
- find in earthquake countries do not appear to be in any way different
- from those which are built in countries free from earthquakes. In
- the one country these structures have simply to withstand vertical
- pressures applied statically; in the other, they have to withstand more
- or less horizontal stresses, applied suddenly.</p>
-
- <p><em>Relation of Destruction to Earthquake Motion.</em>—The relations which
- exist between the overturning and projection of bodies and the motion
- of the ground have already been discussed. It may be interesting
- to call attention to the fact that in the formulæ showing three
- relationships, it was the <em>shape</em> rather than the <em>weight</em> of a body
- which determined whether it should be overturned or projected by a
- motion at its base.</p>
-
- <p>As an interesting proof that light bodies may be overturned as easily
- as heavy ones. Mallet refers to the overturning of several large
- haystacks as one of the results of the Neapolitan earthquake.</p>
-
- <p>If masses of material are displaced or fractured, then Mallet remarks
- that the maximum velocity will exceed √<span class="sqrt3">2<i>gh</i></span>, where <i>h</i> is the
- amplitude of the wave. Should the maximum velocity be less than this
- quantity, the masses which are acted upon will be simply raised and
- lowered,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_104">104</span>
- and there will be no relative displacements even if the
- emergence of the wave be nearly or quite vertical.</p>
-
- <p>When we get a vertical wave acting upon an irregular mass of masonry,
- the heavier portions of the masonry, by their inertia, tend to descend
- relatively to the remaining portions, and in this way vertical fissures
- will be produced. For this reason it would not be advisable to use
- heavy materials above archways, heavy roofs, or heavy floors. The
- vertical fissures, Mallet remarks, would have their widest opening at
- the base.</p>
-
- <p>In considering cases of fracture produced by earthquake motion, it
- must be remembered that these are due to stresses applied <em>suddenly</em>,
- and that if the same amount of stress had been <em>slowly</em> applied to a
- building, fractures might not have occurred.</p>
-
- <p>If a disturbance is horizontal, and has a direction parallel to the
- length of a wall, the wall is carried forward at its foundations. This
- motion is opposed by the inertia of the upper portion of the wall and
- the various loads it carries. The wall being elastic, distortion takes
- place, and cracks, which are widest at the top, will be formed. In a
- uniform wall the two most prominent fissures ought to be near the ends.</p>
-
- <p>If the horizontal backward and forward movement has a direction
- oblique to the plane of the wall, the wall will be either overthrown,
- fractured, or have a triangular fragment thrown off towards the origin
- from the end last reached.</p>
-
- <p>Should the wave emerge steeply, diagonal fissures at right angles to
- the direction of transit will be formed, or else triangular pieces will
- be projected.</p>
-
- <p>The accompanying figures are reduced from Mallet’s ‘Account of the
- Neapolitan Earthquake of 1857.’</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_105">105</span>
- <img src="images/i_p105.jpg" width="700" height="297" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 18.</span>—Cathedral Church, Potenza (Mallet).</div>
- </div>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_106">106</span></p>
-
- <p>Taking <i>a b</i> as the general direction of the fractures in
- fig. 18, then <i>c d</i> will represent the direction in which the shock
- emerged, which is at an angle of 23°·20′ to the horizon. It might be
- argued that the direction of these fractures was due to the direction
- in which surface undulations had travelled, or to the relative
- strengths and proportions of different portions of the building. The
- directions of cracks in a building are undoubtedly due to a complexity
- of causes, but for buildings situated in the region of shock the
- impulsive effect of the shock is probably<span class="pagenum" id="Page_107">107</span>
- the most important function
- to be considered. The method of applying the directions of emergence,
- deduced from observations on fractures, to determine the origin of a
- disturbance will be referred to in Chapter X.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p106.jpg" width="533" height="600" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 19.</span>—The Cathedral, Paterno (Mallet).
- Neapolitan Earthquake of 1857.</div>
- </div>
-
- <p>Mallet observed that, although two ends of a building might be nearly
- the same, the fissures and joints do not occur at equal distances from
- the ends, nor are they equally opened.</p>
-
- <p>The end where the joints are the most opened is that which was first
- acted upon, and this phenomenon may be sufficiently well pronounced
- to indicate the direction in which we must look to find the origin
- of a disturbance. Amongst possible explanations for this disposition
- of fractures in a wall. Mallet suggests that they may be due to real
- differences in the two semiphases of the wave of shock, the second
- semiphase being described with a somewhat slower velocity than the
- first. This, it will be observed, is contrary to the indications of
- seismographs.</p>
-
- <p>Fig. 19, of the cathedral at Paterno, shows the effect of a subnormal
- shock striking a wall obliquely and projecting one of its corners.</p>
-
- <h3>MEASUREMENTS OF THE RELATIVE MOTION OF PARTS OF A BUILDING AT THE TIME
- OF AN EARTHQUAKE.</h3>
-
- <p>In 1880 a series of observations was made in Tokio to determine whether
- at the time of an earthquake the various parts of the arched openings
- which we see in many buildings synchronised in their vibrations, or,
- for want of synchronism, were caused to approach and recede from each
- other. The arches experimented on were heavy brick arches forming the
- two corridors of the Imperial College of Engineering. The direction of
- one set of these corridors is N. 40° E. and that of the other N. 50° W.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_108">108</span></p>
-
- <p>The thickness of the walls in which these arches are placed is 1 ft.
- 11 in. They are built of Japanese bricks bound together with ordinary
- lime. The span of the arches is 8 ft. 3 in., and the height of the arch
- from the springing-line to the crown 4 ft. 1 in. The height of the
- abutments is 7 ft. 1½ in. The voussoirs of the arch are formed of a
- light grey soft volcanic rock, and on their faces show a depth of 12
- inches. The width of the intermediate columns between the arches is 4
- ft. 6⅞ in.</p>
-
- <p>To determine whether at the time of an earthquake there was any
- variation in the dimensions of these arches, a light stiff deal
- rod, about 2 in. by ½ in. in cross section, was placed across the
- springing-line of the arch. One end of this was firmly fixed to the
- top of one abutment by means of a spike; on the other end, which was
- to indicate any horizontal movement if the abutments approached each
- other, there was fixed a pointer made out of a piece of steel wire.
- This rested on a piece of smoked glass fixed to the ledge on which
- the loose end of the rod was resting. If the abutments approached or
- receded from each other a line would be drawn measuring the extent of
- the motion. As a further indication of motion, a second smoked glass
- plate was fixed on the transverse rod, which plate was marked on by a
- pointer attached to a vertical rod hanging down from the crown of the
- arch.</p>
-
- <p>As a general result of these experiments it may be said that the
- portions of the building which were examined usually either did not
- move at all, or else they practically synchronised in their movements.
- When they did move, the extent of motion was small, and the small
- differences in movement which were observed were in every probability
- far within the elastic limits of the structure.</p>
-
- <p><em>Observations on Cracks.</em>—To determine whether the walls of a building
- which have once been cracked, when<span class="pagenum" id="Page_109">109</span>
- subjected to a series of shocks,
- similar to those which they experienced before being cracked, still
- continued to give way, the extremities of a considerable number of
- cracks in the N.E. end of the museum buildings of the Engineering
- College were marked with pencil. Although since the time of marking
- there had been many severe shocks, these cracks did not visibly extend.
- These marks were made on the outside wall of the building. On the
- inside, one of these same cracks showed itself as a fissure about ¼
- inch in width. Across this crack a horizontal steel wire pointer was
- placed. One end of this wire was fixed in the wall; the other end,
- which was pointed, rested on the surface of a smoked glass plate placed
- on the other side of the crack. After small earthquakes there was no
- indication of motion having taken place, but after a shock on February
- 21, as indicated by a line upon the smoked glass plate, it was seen
- that the sides of the crack had approached and receded from each other
- through a distance of about ¹/₁₆ inch.</p>
-
- <p>By similar contrivances placed on cracks in a neighbouring building
- exactly similar results were obtained, namely, that during small
- earthquakes the two sides of the crack had retained their relative
- positions, but at the time of a large shock this position had been
- changed.</p>
-
- <p>In this building it was also observed that the cracks in many instances
- increased their length.</p>
-
- <p>By attaching levers to the end of the pointers to multiply any motion
- that might take place, no doubt the indications would be more frequent
- and more definite. It would also be easier to note the relative
- distances of motion in two directions, namely, how far the cracks had
- closed and how far they had opened. As to whether motion would occur or
- not, much would no doubt depend upon the direction of the earthquake.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_110">110</span></p>
-
- <p><em>Prevention of Fractures.</em>—One conclusion which may perhaps be drawn
- from these observations is, that a cracked building at the time of an
- earthquake shows a certain amount of flexibility. Whether a building
- which had been designed with cracks or joints between those parts
- which were likely to have different periods of vibration would be more
- stable, so far as earthquake shakings are concerned, than a similar
- building put up in an ordinary manner, is a matter to be decided by
- experiment. Certainly some of the cracks which have been examined
- indicate that if they had not existed, the strain upon the portion of
- the building where they occur would have been extremely great.</p>
-
- <p><em>Direction of Cracks.</em>—In looking at the cracks produced by small
- earthquakes it is interesting to note the manner of their extension.
- The basements of the buildings which have been most carefully examined
- are, for a height of two or three feet, built of large rectangular
- blocks of a greyish-coloured volcanic rock. In these parts the cracks
- pass in and out between the joints of the stone, indicating that
- the stones have evidently been stronger than the mortar which bound
- them together, and as a consequence the latter had to give way.
- Above this basement when the cracks enter the brickwork, they no
- longer exclusively confine themselves to the joints, but run in an
- irregular line through all they meet with, sometimes across the bricks
- and sometimes through the mortar joints. In places where they have
- traversed the brickwork, we can say that the mortar has been stronger
- than the bricks. This traversing of the bricks rather than the joints
- is, I think, the general rule for the direction of the cracks in the
- brickwork of Tokio buildings.</p>
-
- <p><em>The Pitch of Roofs.</em>—From observation of the effects
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_111">111</span> produced by
- earthquakes, it appears to us that the houses which lost the greater
- number of tiles appear to be those with the steepest pitch, and those
- where the tiles were simply laid upon the roof and not in any manner
- fastened down. It would seem that destruction of this sort might to a
- great extent be obviated by giving the roofs a less inclination and
- fixing the tiles with nails. It was also noticed that the greatest
- disturbance amongst the tiles was upon the ridges of the roofs.
- Destruction of this sort might be overcome by giving especial attention
- to these portions during the construction of the roof.</p>
-
- <div class="figleft">
- <img src="images/i_p112.jpg" width="330" height="236" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 20. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Fig. 21.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p><em>Relative Position of Openings in Walls.</em>—From what has been said about
- the fractures in the buildings of Tokio it will have been seen that,
- with but few exceptions, they have all taken place above openings
- like doorways and windows. If architecture demands that openings like
- arches should be placed one above another in heavy walls of this kind,
- as in fig. 17, there will be lines of weakness running through the
- openings parallel to the dotted lines. As arches are only intended
- to resist vertical thrusts, special construction must be adopted to
- make them strong enough to resist horizontal pulls. For instance, a
- flat arch would offer more resistance to horizontal pulls than an
- arch put together with ordinary voussoirs, there being in the former
- case more friction to prevent the component parts sliding over each
- other. Or again, above each arch an iron girder or wooden lintel might
- be inserted in the brick or stone arch. It was suggested to me by my
- colleague, Mr. Perry, that the best form calculated to give a wall
- uniform strength, would be to build it so that the openings of each
- tier would occupy alternate positions, that is to say, along lines
- parallel to the struts and ties of a girder. In this way we should have
- our materials so arranged that they would offer the same resistance to
- horizontal<span class="pagenum" id="Page_112">112</span>
- as to vertical movements. Such a wall is shown in fig. 20:
- the dotted lines running through the openings, and all similar lines
- parallel to the former, representing lines of weakness. If we compare
- this with fig. 21, we shall see that in the case of a horizontal
- movement <i>a b</i> or of a vertical movement <i>c d</i>, we should rather expect
- to find fractures in a house built like fig. 21 than in one built
- like fig. 20. If, however, these two buildings were shaken by a shock
- which had an angle of emergence of about 45° in the direction <i>e f</i>,
- the effects might be reversed. Usually, however, and always in a town
- like Tokio which is visited by shocks originating at a distance, the
- movements are practically horizontal ones, and, therefore, buildings
- erected on the principles illustrated by fig. 20 should be much
- superior, so far as resisting earthquakes is concerned, to buildings
- constructed in the ordinary manner, as in fig. 21. Fractures following
- a vertical line of weakness are shown in the accompanying drawing,
- fig. 22, of the Church of St. Augustin, at Manilla, shattered by the
- earthquakes of 1880.</p>
-
- <p><em>The last House in a Row.</em>—When an earthquake shock enters a line
- of buildings, and proceeds in a direction coincident with that of
- the buildings, we should expect that the last of these houses, being
- unsupported on one side, would be in the position of the last person in
- Tyndall’s row of boys. From this it would seem that the end house in a
- row would show the greatest tendency to fly away from its neighbours.
- If the last house stood upon the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_113">113</span>
- edge of a deep canal or a cliff,
- there would be a layer of ground, equal in thickness to the depth of
- the canal or to the height of the cliff, as the case may be, which
- would also be in a position to be thrown forward. The effect which is
- sometimes produced upon an end building is shown in fig. 23, which is
- taken from the photograph of a house shattered in 1868 at San Francisco.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p113.jpg" width="558" height="700" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 22.</span>—Church of St. Augustin, Manilla.
- Earthquakes of July 18–20, 1880.</div>
- </div>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_114">114</span></p>
-
- <p><em>The Swing of Buildings.</em>—The distance through which buildings are
- moved at the time of an earthquake depends partly on their construction
- and partly on the extent, nature, and duration of the movement
- communicated to them at their foundations. By violent shocks buildings
- may be completely overthrown. In the case of small earthquakes, the
- upper portion of a house may frequently move through a much greater
- distance than the ground at its foundation. For instance, during the
- Yokohama earthquake of February, 1880, when the maximum amplitude of
- the earth’s motion was probably under ¾ of an inch, from the slow
- swing of long Japanese pictures, from three to six feet in length,
- which oscillated backwards and forwards on the wall, it is very
- probable that the extent through which the upper portion of houses
- moved was very considerable. In some instances these pictures seem to
- have swung as much as two feet, and from the manner in which they swung
- they evidently synchronised with the natural swing of the house.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p114.jpg" width="536" height="336" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 23.</span>—Webber House, San Francisco.&nbsp; &nbsp; Oct. 21,
- 1868.</div>
- </div>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_115">115</span></p>
-
- <p>From this it would seem that such a house must have rocked from side to
- side one foot out of its normal perpendicular position. That the motion
- was great is testified by nearly all who tried to stand at the time of
- the shock, it having been impossible to walk steadily across the floor
- of a room in an upper story. The houses here referred to are either
- those which are purely Japanese, or else those which are framed of wood
- and built on European models, a class of building which is very common
- in Tokio and Yokohama.</p>
-
- <p>Perry and Ayrton calculated the period of a complete natural vibration
- of different structures. For a square house whose outer and inner
- sections were respectively 30 and 26 feet, and whose height was 30
- feet, the period calculated would be about ·06 second.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the above earthquake many houses seem to have moved like
- inverted pendulums. On the morning after the shock my neighbour, who
- was living upstairs in a tall wooden house with a tile roof, told me
- that he endeavoured to count the vibrations, and was of the impression
- that to make a complete swing it took about 2 seconds.</p>
-
- <p>Assuming now that the distance through which the top of a wooden house
- moved was about 1 foot, and the number of vibrations which it made per
- second was about ·5, then the greatest velocity of a point on the top
- of such a house must have been about 6 feet per second.</p>
-
- <p>Mallet, who made observations upon the vibrations of various
- structures, tells us that Salisbury spire moves to and fro in a gale
- more than 3 inches. A well-constructed brick and mortar wall, 40 feet
- high and 1 foot 6 inches thick, was observed to vibrate in a gale 2
- feet transversely before it fell.</p>
-
- <p>An octagonal chimney with a heavy granite capping,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_116">116</span> 160 feet high, was
- observed instrumentally to vibrate at the top nearly 5 inches.<a id="FNanchor_22" href="#Footnote_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a></p>
-
- <p>At the time of a severe earthquake it does not seem impossible but that
- a building may be swung completely over. The accompanying illustration,
- fig. 24, taken from a photograph,<a id="FNanchor_23" href="#Footnote_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> apparently indicates a movement
- of description.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p116.jpg" width="534" height="337" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 24.</span>—Stud Mill at Haywards,
- California.&nbsp; &nbsp; Oct. 21, 1868.</div>
- </div>
-
- <p><em>Principle of relative Vibrational Period.</em>—If a lath or thin pole
- loaded at one end with a weight fixed to the ground, so as to stand
- vertically, be shaken by an earthquake it will be caused to rock to
- and fro like an inverted pendulum. The period of its swing will be
- chiefly dependent on its dimensions, its elasticity, and its load. In
- a building we have to consider the vibration of a number of parts, the
- periods of which, if they were <span class="pagenum" id="Page_117">117</span>
- independent of each other, would be
- different. On account of this difference in period, whilst one portion
- of a building is endeavouring to move towards the right, another
- is pulling towards the left, and, in consequence, either the bonds
- which join them or else they themselves are strained or broken. This
- was strikingly illustrated by many of the chimneys in the houses at
- Yokohama, which by the earthquake of February 20, 1880, were shorn off
- just above the roof. The chimneys were shafts of brick, and probably
- had a slower period of vibration than the roof through which they
- passed, this latter vibrating with the main portion of the house, which
- was framed of wood.</p>
-
- <p>A particularly instructive example of this kind which came under my
- notice is roughly sketched in fig. 25.</p>
-
- <div class="figright">
- <img src="images/i_p117.jpg" width="142" height="219" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 25.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>This is a chimney standing alone, which, for the sake of support, was
- strapped by an iron band to an adjoining building. It would seem that
- at the time of the shock, the building moving one way and the chimney
- another, the swing of the heavy building gave the chimney a sharp jerk
- and cut it off. The upper portion, being then loose upon the lower
- part, rotated under the influence of the oscillations in manner similar
- to that in which gravestones are rotated.</p>
-
- <p>Mallet made observations similar to these in Italy. He tells us that a
- buttress may often not have time to transmit its stability to a wall.
- The wall and the buttress have different periods of vibration, and
- therefore they exert impulsive actions on each other. Effects like
- these were strikingly observable in many of the rural
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_118">118</span> Italian churches
- where the belfry tower is built into one of the quoins of the main
- rectangular building.</p>
-
- <p>Not only have we to consider the relative vibrations of the various
- parts of a building amongst themselves, but we have to consider the
- relation of the natural vibrations of any one of them or the vibration
- of the building as a whole, with regard to the earth, the vibrations of
- which it must be remembered are not strictly periodic.</p>
-
- <p>Some of the more important results dependent upon the principle of
- ‘relative vibrational periods’ may be understood from the following
- experiments:—</p>
-
- <div class="figleft">
- <img src="images/i_p118.jpg" width="258" height="155" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 26.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>In fig. 26 <span class="smcap">a</span>, <span class="smcap">b</span>, and <span class="smcap">c</span> are three flat
- springs made out of strips of bamboo, and loaded at the top with pieces
- of lead. At the bottom they are fixed into a piece of board <span class="smcap">d e</span>,
- and the whole rests on a table <span class="smcap">f g</span>. The legs of this
- table being slightly loose, by placing the fingers on the top of it, a
- quick short backward and forward movement can be produced. The weights
- on <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">b</span> are the same, but they are larger than
- the weight on <span class="smcap">c</span>. Consequently the periods of <span class="smcap">a</span> and
- <span class="smcap">b</span> are the same, but different to the period of <span class="smcap">c</span>.
- The dimensions of these springs are as follows: height, 18 inches;
- <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">b</span> each carry weights equal to 320 grammes, and
- they make one vibration per second; <span class="smcap">c</span> has a weight of 199
- grammes, and makes 0·75 vibrations per second.</p>
-
- <p><em>First Experiment.</em>—It will be found that by giving the table a gentle
- backward and forward movement, the extent of which movement may be
- so small that it will be difficult to detect it with the eye, either
- <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">b</span> may be
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_119">119</span> made to oscillate violently whilst
- <span class="smcap">c</span> remains still; or <i xml:lang="la">vice versâ</i>, <span class="smcap">c</span> may be caused to
- oscillate whilst <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">b</span> remain still. In the one
- case the period of shaking will have been synchronous with the natural
- period of <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">b</span>, whilst in the latter it will have
- been synchronous with that of <span class="smcap">c</span>. This would seem to show us
- that if the natural period of vibration of a house, or of parts of
- it, at any time agree with the period of the shock, it may be readily
- thrown into a state of oscillation which will be dangerous for its
- safety.</p>
-
- <p><em>Second Experiment.</em>—Bind <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">b</span> together with a
- strip of paper pasted between them. (The paper used was three-eighths
- of an inch broad and would carry a weight of nearly three pounds.)
- If the table be now shaken as before, <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">b</span> will
- always have similar movements, and tend to remain at the same distance
- apart, and as a consequence the strip of paper will not be broken. From
- this experiment it would seem that so long as the different portions
- of a building have almost the same periods of vibration, there will be
- little or no strain upon the tie-rods or whatever contrivance may be
- used in connecting the different parts.</p>
-
- <p><em>Third Experiment.</em>—Join <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">c</span>, or <span class="smcap">b</span>
- and <span class="smcap">c</span> with a strip of paper in a manner similar to the last
- experiment. If the table be now shaken with a period approximating
- either to that of <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">b</span>, or with that of
- <span class="smcap">c</span>, the paper will be suddenly snapped.</p>
-
- <p>This indicates that if we have different portions of a building of
- such heights and thicknesses that their natural periods of vibration
- are different, the strain upon the portions which connect such parts
- is enormous, and it would seem, as a consequence, that either the
- vibrators themselves, or else their connections, must, of a necessity,
- give way. This was very forcibly illustrated in the Yokohama
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_120">120</span>
- earthquake of February 1880 by the knocking over of chimneys. The
- particular case of the chimneys is, however, better illustrated by the
- next experiment.</p>
-
- <p><em>Fourth Experiment.</em>—Take a little block of wood three-quarters of
- an inch square and about one inch high, and place it on the top of
- <span class="smcap">a</span>, <span class="smcap">b</span>, or <span class="smcap">c</span>. It will be found that, although
- the spring on which it stands is caused to swing backwards and forwards
- through a distance of three inches, the little block will retain its
- position.</p>
-
- <p>This little block we may regard as the upper part of a chimney standing
- on a vibrating stack, and we see that, so long as this upper portion is
- light, it has no tendency to fall.</p>
-
- <p><em>Fifth Experiment.</em>—Repeat the fourth experiment, having first placed a
- small leaden cap on the top of the block representing the chimney. (The
- cap used only weighed a few grammes.) When vibration commences it will
- be found that the block quickly falls. This would seem to indicate that
- chimneys with heavy tops are more likely to fall than light ones.</p>
-
- <p><em>Sixth Experiment.</em>—Bind <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">b</span> together with a
- strip of paper and stand the little block upon the top of either. It
- will be found that the block will stand as in the fourth experiment.</p>
-
- <p><em>Seventh Experiment.</em>—Bind <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">c</span>, or <span class="smcap">b</span>
- and <span class="smcap">c</span> together, and place the block upon the top of either of
- them. When vibration commences, although the paper may not be broken,
- the little block will quickly fall.</p>
-
- <p><em>Eighth Experiment.</em>—Take two pencils or pieces of glass tube and place
- them under the board <span class="smcap">d e</span>. If the table <span class="smcap">F G</span> be now
- shaken in the direction <span class="smcap">d e</span>, it will be found that the springs
- will not vibrate.</p>
-
- <p>In a similar manner if a house or portion of a house were carried on
- balls or rollers, as has already been suggested,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_121">121</span> it would seem that
- the house might be saved from much vibration.</p>
-
- <p><em>Ninth Experiment.</em>—Set any of the springs in violent vibration by
- gently shaking <span class="smcap">d e</span> instead of the table, and then suddenly
- cease the actuating motion. It will be observed that at the moment
- of cessation the board and the springs will have a sudden and very
- decided motion of translation in the same direction as that in which
- the springs were last moving, and although the springs were at the time
- swinging through a considerable arc, all motion will suddenly cease.</p>
-
- <p>This shows, that if a house is in a state of vibration the strain at
- the foundations must be very great.</p>
-
- <p>It would not be difficult to devise other experiments to illustrate
- other phenomena connected with the principle of relative vibrational
- periods, but these may perhaps be sufficient to show to those who have
- not considered this matter its great importance in the construction
- of buildings. Perhaps the greater portion of what is here said may by
- many be regarded as self-evident truisms hardly worth the trouble of
- demonstration. Their importance, however, seems to be so great that I
- hope that their discussion has not been altogether out of place.</p>
-
- <p>I may remark that in the rebuilding of chimneys in Yokohama the
- principles here enunciated were taken advantage of by allowing the
- chimneys to pass freely through the roofs without coming in contact
- with any of the main timbers.</p>
-
- <p>In putting up buildings to resist the effects of an earthquake, besides
- the idea of making everything strong because the earthquake is strong,
- there are several principles which, like the one just enunciated, might
- advantageously be followed which as yet appear to have received but
- little attention.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_VII">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_122">122</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER VII.<br />
- <span class="subhead">EFFECTS PRODUCED UPON BUILDINGS (continued).</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Types of buildings used in earthquake countries—In Japan,
- in Italy, in South America, in Caraccas—Typical houses
- for earthquake countries—Destruction due to the nature of
- underlying rocks—The swing of mountains—Want of support on
- the face of hills—Earthquake shadows—Destruction due to the
- interference of waves—Earthquake bridges—Examples of earthquake
- effects—Protection of buildings—General conclusions.</div>
-
- <p><em>Types of buildings used in earthquake countries.</em>—In Japan there
- are excellent opportunities of studying various types of buildings.
- The Japanese types, of course, form the majority of the buildings.
- The ordinary Japanese house consists of a light framework of 4 or
- 5 inch scantling, built together without struts or ties, all the
- timbers crossing each other at right angles. The spaces are filled
- in with wattle-work of bamboo, and this is plastered over with mud.
- This construction stands on the top of a row of boulders or of square
- stones, driven into the surface soil to a distance varying from a few
- inches to a foot. The whole arrangement is so light that it is not an
- uncommon thing to see a large house rolled along from one position to
- another on wooden rollers. In buildings such as these after a series of
- small earthquake shocks, we could hardly expect to find more fractures
- than in a wicker basket.</p>
-
- <p>The larger buildings, such as temples and pagodas, are
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_123">123</span> also built of
- timber. These are built up of such a multitude of pieces and framed
- together in such an intricate manner that they also are capable of
- yielding in all directions. The European buildings are, of course,
- made of brick and stone with mortar joints. Some of these, as the
- buildings of the Ginza in Tokio, are not designed for great strength.
- On the other hand, others have thick and massive walls and are equal in
- strength to those we find in Europe.</p>
-
- <p>The third type of buildings are those which are built in blocks; and
- these blocks being bound together with iron rods traversing the walls
- in various directions are especially designed to withstand earthquakes.
- A system somewhat similar to this has been patented in America, and
- examples of these so-called earthquake-proof buildings are to be found
- in San Francisco.</p>
-
- <p>Speaking of Japanese buildings, Mr. R. H. Brunton, who has devoted
- especial attention to them says that,<a id="FNanchor_24" href="#Footnote_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> ‘to imagine that slight
- buildings, such as are seen here (i.e. in Japan), are the best
- calculated to withstand an earthquake shock is an error of the most
- palpable kind.’ After describing the construction of a Japanese house
- in pretty much the same terms as we have used, he says ‘that with its
- unnecessarily heavy roof and weak framework it is a structure of all
- others the worst adapted to withstand a heavy shock.’ He tells us,
- further, that these views are sustained by the truest principles of
- mechanics. In order to render buildings to some extent proof against
- earthquakes, some of the heavy roofs in Tokio have been so constructed
- that they are capable of sliding on the walls. Mr. Brunton mentions
- a design for a house, the upper <span class="pagenum" id="Page_124">124</span>
- part of which is to rest on balls,
- which roll on inverted cups fixed on the lower part of the building,
- which is to be firmly embedded in the earth. A similar design was,
- at the suggestion of Mallet, used to support the tables carrying the
- apparatus of some of the lighthouses erected in Japan by Mr. Brunton.
- The very existence of these designs seems to indicate that the ordinary
- European house, however solidly and strongly it may be built, is not
- sufficient to meet the conditions imposed upon it. What is required,
- is something that will give way—an approximation to the timber frame
- of a Japanese house, so strongly condemned by Mr. Brunton and others.
- The crucial test of the value of the Japanese structure, as compared
- with the modern buildings of brick and stone, is undoubtedly to be
- found by an appeal to the buildings themselves. So far as my own
- experience has gone, I must say that I have never seen any signs in
- the Japanese timber buildings which could be attributed to the effects
- of earthquakes, and His Excellency Yamao Yozo, Vice Minister of Public
- Works, who has made the study of the buildings of Japan a speciality,
- told me that none of the temples and palaces, although many of them
- are several centuries old, and although they have been shaken by small
- earthquakes and also by many severe ones, show any signs of having
- suffered. The greatest damage wrought by large earthquakes appears to
- have resulted from the influx of large waves or from fires. In every
- case where an earthquake has been accompanied by great destruction,
- by consulting the books describing the same, it can be seen, from the
- illustrations in these books portraying conflagrations, that this
- destruction was chiefly due to fire. When we remember that nearly
- all Japanese houses are constructed of materials that are readily
- inflammable, it is not hard to imagine how destruction of
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_125">125</span> this kind
- has come about. To a Japanese, living as he does in a house which has
- been compared to a tinder-box, fire is one of his greatest enemies,
- and in a city like Tokio it is not at all uncommon to see during the
- winter months many fires which sweep away from 100 to 500 houses. In
- one winter I was a spectator of three fires, each of which was said to
- have destroyed upwards of 10,000 houses.</p>
-
- <p>Although it would appear that the smaller earthquakes of Japan produce
- no visible effect upon the native buildings, it is nevertheless
- probable that small effects may have been produced, the observation
- of which is rendered difficult by the nature of the structure. If we
- look at buildings of foreign construction, by which are meant buildings
- of brick and stone, the picture before us is quite different, and
- everywhere the effects of earthquakes are palpable even to the most
- casual observer. Of these effects numerous examples have already been
- given. Not only are these buildings damaged by the cracking of walls
- and the overturning of chimneys, but they also appear to be affected
- internally. For instance, in the timbers of the roof of the museum
- attached to the Imperial College of Engineering in Tokio, there are a
- number of diagonal faces acting as struts or ties intended to prevent
- more or less horizontal movements taking place. Those which are rigidly
- joined together with bolts and angle irons have apparently suffered
- from their rigidity, being twisted and bent into various forms. The
- buildings in Tokio, which are strongly put together, being especially
- designed to withstand earthquakes, appear to have suffered but little.
- I know only one example which at the time of the severe shock of 1880
- had several of its chimneys damaged.</p>
-
- <p>The ordinary houses in Italy, though built of stone and
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_126">126</span> mortar, are
- but poorly put together, and, as Mallet has remarked, are in no way
- adapted to withstand the frightful shakings to which they are subjected
- from time to time.</p>
-
- <p>In the large towns, like Naples, Rome, and Florence, where happily
- earthquakes are of rare occurrence, although the building may be
- better than that found in the country, the height of the houses and
- the narrowness of the streets are sufficient to create a shudder, when
- we think of the possibility of the occurrence of a moderately severe
- earthquake.</p>
-
- <p>In South America, although many buildings are built with brick
- and stone, the ordinary houses, and even the larger edifices, are
- specially built to withstand earthquakes. In Mr. James Douglas’s
- account of a ‘Journey Along the West Coast of South America,’ we read
- the following<a id="FNanchor_25" href="#Footnote_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a>: ‘The characteristic building material of Guayaquil
- is bamboo, which grows to many inches in thickness, and which, when
- cut partially through longitudinally at distances of an inch or so,
- and once quite through, can be opened out into fine elastic boards of
- serviceable width. Houses, and even churches, of a certain primitive
- beauty are built of such reeds, so bound together with cords that few
- nails enter into the construction, and which, therefore, yield so
- readily to the contortions of the earth during an earthquake as to be
- comparatively safe.’</p>
-
- <p>Here we have a house, which, so far as earthquakes are concerned, is
- an exaggerated example of the principles which are followed in the
- construction of an ordinary Japanese dwelling.</p>
-
- <p>Another plan adopted in South America can be gathered from the same
- author’s writings upon Lima, about which he says, ‘To build high houses
- would be to erect structures for the first earthquake to make sport of,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_127">127</span>
- and, therefore, in order to obtain space, safety, and comfort, the
- houses of the wealthy surround court after court, filled with flowers,
- and cooled with fountains, connected one with another with wide
- passages which give a vista from garden to garden.’</p>
-
- <p>History would indicate that houses of this type have been arrived at as
- the results of experience, for it is said that when the inhabitants of
- South America first saw the Spaniards building tall houses, they told
- them they were building their own sepulchres.<a id="FNanchor_26" href="#Footnote_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a></p>
-
- <p>In Jamaica, we find that even as early as 1692 experience had taught
- the Spaniards to construct low houses, which withstood shakings better
- than the tall ones.<a id="FNanchor_27" href="#Footnote_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a></p>
-
- <p>In Caraccas, which has been called the city of earthquakes, it is
- said that the earthquakes cause an average yearly damage amounting to
- the equivalent of a <i xml:lang="la">per capita</i> tax of four dollars. To reduce this
- impost to a minimum much attention is paid to construction. ‘Projecting
- basement corners (giving the house a slightly pyramidal appearance)
- have been found better than absolutely perpendicular walls; mortised
- corner-stones and roof beams have saved many lives when the central
- walls have split from top to bottom; vaults and key-stone arches, no
- matter how massive, are more perilous than common wooden lintels, and
- there are not many isolated buildings in the city. In many streets
- broad iron girders, riveted to the wall, about a foot above the house
- door, run from house to house along the front of an entire square.
- Turret-like brick chimneys, with iron top ornaments, would expose the
- architect to the vengeance of an excited mob; the roofs are flat,
- or flat terraced; the chimney flues terminate near the eaves in a
- perforated lid.’<a id="FNanchor_28" href="#Footnote_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a></p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_128">128</span></p>
-
- <p><em>Typical houses for earthquake countries.</em>—From what has now been said
- about the different buildings found in earthquake countries, it will be
- seen that if we wish to put up a building able to withstand a severe
- shaking, we have before us structures of two types. One of these types
- may be compared with a steel box, which, even were it rolled down a
- high mountain, would suffer but little damage; and the other, with a
- wicker basket, which would equally withstand so severe a test. Both
- of these types may be, to some extent, protected by placing them upon
- a loose foundation, so that but little momentum enters them at their
- base. One suggestion is to place a building upon iron balls. Another
- method would be to place them upon two sets of rollers, one set resting
- upon the other set at right angles. The Japanese, we have seen, place
- their houses on round stones. The solid type of building is expensive,
- and can only be approached partially, whilst the latter is cheap, and
- can be approached closely. In the case of a solid building it would be
- a more difficult matter to support it upon a movable foundation than in
- the case of a light framework. Such a building is usually firmly fixed
- on the ground, and consequently at the time of an earthquake, as has
- already been shown by experiment, must be subjected to stresses which
- are very great. In consequence also of the greater weight of the solid
- structure, more momentum will enter it at its base than in the case of
- the light structure. Also, we must remember that the rigidity favours
- the transmission of momentum, and with rigid walls we are likely to
- have ornaments, coping-stones, and the comparatively freer portions
- forming the upper part of a building displaced; whilst, with flexible
- walls absorbing momentum in the friction of their various parts, such
- disturbances would not be so likely. Mr. T. Ronaldson, referring to
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_129">129</span>
- this, says, that in 1868, at San Francisco, the ornamental stone work
- in stone and cement buildings was thrown from its position, whilst
- similar ornaments in neighbouring brick buildings stood.</p>
-
- <p>To reduce the top weight of a building, hollow bricks might be
- employed. To render a building more homogeneous and elastic, the
- thickness of bricks might be reduced. Inasmuch as the elasticity
- of brick and timber are so different, the two ought to be employed
- separately. For internal decorations plaster mouldings might be
- replaced by <i xml:lang="fr">papier mâché</i> and <i xml:lang="fr">carton-pierre</i>, the elastic yielding of
- which is comparatively great.<a id="FNanchor_29" href="#Footnote_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> Houses, whether of brick and stone,
- or of timber, ought to be broad and low, and the streets three or four
- times as wide as the houses. The flatter the roofs the better.</p>
-
- <p>One of the safest houses for an earthquake country would probably be a
- one-storied strongly framed timber house, with a light flattish roof
- made of shingles or sheet-iron, the whole resting on a quantity of
- small cast-iron balls carried on flat plates bedded in the foundations.
- The chimneys might be made of sheet-iron carried through holes free of
- the roof. The ornamentation ought to be of light materials.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of severe earthquakes many persons seek refuge from their
- houses by leaving them. In this case accidents frequently happen from
- the falling of bricks and tiles. Others rush to the doorways and
- stand beneath the lintels. Persons with whom the author has conversed
- have suggested that strongly constructed tables and bedsteads in
- their rooms would give protection. To see persons darting beneath
- tables and bedsteads would undoubtedly give rise to humiliating and
- ludicrous exhibitions. This latter idea is not without a value, and
- most <span class="pagenum" id="Page_130">130</span>
- certainly, if applied in houses of the type described, would be
- valuable.</p>
-
- <p>The great danger of fire may partially be obviated by: the use of
- ‘earthquake lamps,’ which are so constructed that before they overturn
- they are extinguished. It is said that in South America some of the
- inhabitants are ready at any moment to seek refuge in the streets,
- and they have coats prepared, stocked with provisions and; other
- necessaries, which, if occasion demands, will enable them to spend the
- night in the open air. These coats, called ‘earthquake coats,’ might
- also, with properly constructed houses, be rendered unnecessary.</p>
-
- <p><em>Destruction due to the nature of the underlying rocks.</em>—That the
- nature of the ground on which a building stands is intimately related
- with the severity of the blow it receives is a fact which has often
- been demonstrated.</p>
-
- <p>One cause of destruction is due to placing a building on foundations
- which are capable of receiving the full effects of a shock, and
- transmitting it to the buildings standing on them.</p>
-
- <p>For instance, the reason why a soft bed might possibly make a good
- foundation, is, as has been pointed out by Messrs. Perry and Ayrton,
- because the time of transmission of momentum is increased; in fact, the
- soft bed is very like a piece of wood interposed between a nail and
- the blows of a hammer—it lengthens the duration of impact. For this
- reason we are told that a quaking bog will make a good foundation. When
- a shock enters loose materials its waves will be more crowded, and it
- is possible that a line of buildings may rest on more than one wave
- during a shock. There are many examples on record of the stability of
- buildings which rested on beds of particular material at the time of
- destructive earthquakes. As<span class="pagenum" id="Page_131">131</span>
- the observations which have been made
- by various writers on this subject appear to point in a contrary
- direction, I give the following examples:—</p>
-
- <p>In the great Jamaica earthquake of 1692, the portions of Port
- Royal which remained standing were situated on a compact limestone
- foundation; whilst those on sand and gravel were destroyed (‘Geological
- Observer,’ p. 426). Again, on p. 148 of the same work, we read,
- ‘According to the observations made at Lisbon, in 1737, by Mr. Sharpe,
- the destroying effects of this earthquake were confined to the tertiary
- strata, and were most violent on the blue clay, on which the lower part
- of the city is constructed. Not a building on the secondary limestone
- or on the basalt was injured.’</p>
-
- <p>In the great earthquakes of Messina, those portions of the town
- situated on alluvium, near the sea, were destroyed, whilst the high
- parts of the town, on granite, did not suffer so much. Similar
- observations were made in Calabria, when districts consisting of
- gravel, sand, and clay became, by the shaking, almost unrecognisable,
- whilst the surrounding hills of slate and granite were but little
- altered. At San Francisco, in 1868, the chief destruction was in the
- alluvium and made ground.</p>
-
- <p>At Talcahuano, in 1835, the only houses which escaped were the
- buildings standing on rocky ground; all those resting on sandy soil
- were destroyed.</p>
-
- <p>From the results of observations like these, it would seem the harder
- rocks form better foundations than the softer ones. The explanation of
- this, in many cases, appears to lie in the fact that the soft strata
- were in a state of unstable equilibrium, and by shaking, they were
- caused to settle. Observations like the following, however, point out
- another reason why soft strata may sometimes afford a bad foundation.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_132">132</span></p>
-
- <p>‘Humboldt observed that the Cordilleras, composed of gneiss and
- mica-slate, and the country immediately at their foot, were more shaken
- than the plains.’<a id="FNanchor_30" href="#Footnote_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a></p>
-
- <p>‘Some writers have asserted that the wave-like movements (of the
- Calabrian earthquake in 1783) which were propagated through recent
- strata from west to east, became very violent when they reached the
- point of junction with the granite, as if a reaction was produced when
- the undulatory movement of the soft strata was suddenly arrested by the
- more solid rocks.’</p>
-
- <p>Dolomieu when speaking of this earthquake says, the usual effect ‘was
- to disconnect from the sides of the Apennines all those masses (of sand
- and clay) which either had not sufficient bases for their bulk, or
- which were supported only by lateral adherence.’</p>
-
- <p>These intensified actions taking place at and near to lines of
- junction between dissimilar strata is probably due to the phenomena of
- reflection and refraction.</p>
-
- <p>When referring to the question as to whether buildings situated on
- loose materials suffered more or less than those on solid rocks,
- Mallet, in his description of the Neapolitan earthquake of 1857,
- remarks: ‘We have in this earthquake, towns such as Saponara and
- Viggiano, situated upon solid limestone, totally prostrated; and we
- have others such as Montemarro, to a great extent based upon loose
- clays, totally levelled. We have examples of almost complete immunity
- in places on plains of deep clay as that of Viscolione, and in places
- on solid limestone, like Castelluccio, or perched on mountain tops like
- Petina.’<a id="FNanchor_31" href="#Footnote_31" class="fnanchor">[31]</a></p>
-
- <p>After reading the above, we see that the probable reason why, in
- several cases, beds of soft materials have not made
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_133">133</span>good foundations,
- consists in the fact that they have either been of small extent or else
- have been observed only in the neighbourhood of lines which divided
- them from other formations, which lines are always those of great
- disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>At the end of his description of the Neapolitan earthquake of 1857,
- Mallet says that more buildings were destroyed on the rock than on the
- loose clay. This, however, he remarks, is hardly a fact from which we
- can draw any valuable deductions, because it so happened that more
- buildings were constructed on the hills than on the loose ground.<a id="FNanchor_32" href="#Footnote_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a></p>
-
- <p>Professor D. S. Martin, writing on the earthquake of New England in
- 1874, remarks that in Long Island the shock was felt where there was
- gneiss between the drift. Around portions to the east the observations
- were few and far between. He also remarks that generally the shocks
- were felt more strongly and frequently on rocky than on soft ground.<a id="FNanchor_33" href="#Footnote_33" class="fnanchor">[33]</a></p>
-
- <p>From these examples, it would appear that the hard ground, which
- usually means the hills, forms a better foundation than the softer
- ground, which is usually to be found in the valleys and plains. Other
- examples, however, point to a different conclusion. For instance, a
- civil engineer, writing about the New Zealand earthquake of 1855, when
- all the brick buildings in Wellington were overthrown, says that ‘it
- was most violent on the sides of the hills at those places, and least
- so in the centre of the alluvial plains.’<a id="FNanchor_34" href="#Footnote_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</a></p>
-
- <p>In this example it must be noticed that the soft alluvium here referred
- to was of large extent, and not loose material resting on the flanks of
- rocks, from which it was <span class="pagenum" id="Page_134">134</span>
- likely to be shaken down, as in most of the previous examples.</p>
-
- <p>The results of my own observations on this subject point as much in one
- direction as in the other. In Tokio, from instrumental observations
- upon the slopes and tops of hills, the disturbance appears to be
- very much less than it is in the plains. Thus, at my house, situated
- on the slope of a hill about 100 feet in height, for the earthquake
- of March 11, 1882, I obtained a maximum amplitude of motion of from
- three to four millimètres only, whilst Professor Ewing, with a similar
- instrument, situated on the level ground at about a mile distant,
- found a motion of fully seven millimètres. This calculation has been
- confirmed by observations on other earthquakes. Thus, for instance, in
- the destructive earthquake of 1855, when a large portion of Tokio was
- devastated, it was a fact, remarked by many, that the disturbance was
- most severe on the low ground and in the valleys, whilst on the hills
- the shock had been comparatively weak. As another illustration, I may
- mention that within three-quarters of a mile from my house in Tokio
- there is a prince’s residence which has so great a reputation for the
- severity of the shakings it receives that its marketable value has been
- considerably depreciated, and it is now untenanted.</p>
-
- <p>In Hakodadi, which is a town situated very similarly to Gibraltar,
- partly built on the slope of a high rocky mountain and partly on a
- level plain, from which the mountain rises, the rule is similar to
- that for Tokio, namely, that the low, flat ground is shaken more
- severely than the high ground. At Yokohama, sixteen miles south-west
- from Tokio, the rule is reversed, as was very clearly demonstrated
- by the earthquake of February 1880, when almost every house upon the
- high ground lost its chimney, whilst on the low ground there was
- scarcely any damage<span class="pagenum" id="Page_135">135</span>
- done; the only places on the low ground which
- suffered were those near to the base of the hills. The evidence as to
- the relative value of hard ground as compared with soft ground, for
- the foundation of a building, is very conflicting. Sometimes the hard
- ground has proved the better foundation and sometimes the softer, and
- the superiority of one over the other depends, no doubt, upon a variety
- of local circumstances.</p>
-
- <p>These latter observations open up the inquiry as to the extent to which
- the intensity of an earthquake may be modified by the topography of the
- disturbed area.</p>
-
- <p><em>The swing of mountains.</em>—If an earthquake wave is passing through
- ground the surface of which is level, so long as this ground is
- homogeneous, as the wave travels further and further we should expect
- its energy to become less and less, until, finally, it would insensibly
- die out. If, however, we have standing upon this plain a mountain,
- judging from Mallet’s remarks, this mountain would be set in a state
- of vibration much in the same way as a house is set in vibration,
- and it would tend to oscillate backward and forward with a period of
- vibration dependent upon the nature of its materials, size, and form.
- The upper portion of this mountain would, in consequence, swing through
- a greater arc than the lower portion, and buildings situated on the top
- of it would swing to and fro through a greater arc than those which
- were situated near its foot. This explanation why buildings situated
- on the top of a mountain should suffer more than those situated on
- a plain, is one which was offered by Mallet when writing of the
- Neapolitan earthquake. He tells us that towns on hills are ‘rocked as
- on the top of masts,’ and if we accept this explanation it would, in
- fact, be one reason why the houses situated on the Bluff at
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_136">136</span> Yokohama
- suffered more than those situated in the settlement. This explanation
- is given on account of the great authority it claims as a consequence
- of its source. It is not clear how the statement can be supported,
- as different portions of the mountain receive momentum in opposite
- directions at the same time.</p>
-
- <p><em>Want of support on the faces of hills.</em>—When a wave of elastic
- compression is propagated through a medium, we see that the energy of
- motion is being continually transmitted from particle to particle of
- that medium. A particle, in moving forwards, meets with an elastic
- resistance of the particles towards which it moves, but, overcoming
- these resistances, it causes these latter particles to move, and in
- turn to transmit the energy to others further on. So long as the medium
- in which this transfer of energy is continuous, each particle has a
- limit to its extent of motion, dependent on the nature of the medium.
- When, however, the medium, which we will suppose to be the earth, is
- not continuous, but suddenly terminates with a cliff or scarp, the
- particles adjacent to this cliff or scarp, having no resistance offered
- to their forward motion, are shot forward, and, consequently, the
- ground here is subjected to more extensive vibrations than at those
- places where it was continuous. This may be illustrated by a row of
- marbles lying in a horizontal groove; a single marble rolled against
- one end of this row will give a concussion which will run through the
- chain, like the bumping of an engine against a row of railway cars, and
- as a result, the marble at the opposite end of the row, being without
- support, will fly off. Tyndall illustrates the same thing with his
- well known row of boys, each one standing with his arms stretched out
- and his hands resting upon the shoulders of the boy before him. A push
- being given to the boy at the back,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_137">137</span>
- the effect is to transmit a push
- to the first boy, who, being unsupported, flies forward.</p>
-
- <p>In the case of some earthquakes, most disastrous results have occurred
- which seem only to admit of an explanation such as this. A remarkable
- instance of this kind occurred when the great earthquake of 1857 ‘swept
- along the Alps from Geneva to the east-north-east, and its crest
- reached the edge of the deep glen between Zermatt and Visp. Then the
- upper part of the wave-movement, a thousand or two thousand feet in
- depth from the surface, came to an end; the forward pulsation acted
- like the breaker of the sea, and heavy falls of rock encumbered the
- western side of the valley.’</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquake shadows.</em>—If a mountain stands upon a plain through which
- an elastic wave is passing, which is almost horizontal, the mountain
- is, so to speak, in the <em>shadow</em> of such a wave. If we only consider
- the normal motion of this wave, we see that the only motion which the
- mountain can obtain will be a wave of elastic distortion produced
- by a shearing force along the plain of the base. Should, however,
- the wave approach the mountain from below, and emerge into it at a
- certain angle, only the portion of the mountain on the side from
- which the wave advanced could remain in shadow, whilst the portion
- on the opposite side would be thrown into a state of compression and
- extension. Portions in shadow, however, would be subject to waves
- of elastic distortion. In a manner similar to this we may imagine
- that certain portions of the bluff, so far as the advancing wave was
- concerned, were in shadow, and thus saved from the immediate influence
- of the direct shock. A hypothetical case of such a shadow is shown in
- the accompanying section, illustrating the contour of the ground at
- Yokohama. The situation which might be in the shadow of
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_138">138</span> one shock,
- however, it is quite possible might not be in that of another. We
- must also remember that a place in shadow for a direct shock might be
- affected by reflected waves, and also by the transverse vibrations of
- the direct shock. These effects are over and above the effects produced
- by the waves of elastic distortion just referred to. It might be asked
- whether whole countries, like England, which are but seldom shaken, are
- in shadow.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p138.jpg" width="700" height="247" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 27.</span>—Hypothetical section at Yokohama.</div>
- </div>
-
- <p><em>Destruction due to the interference of waves.</em>—Referring to the
- section of the ground at Yokohama (Fig. 27), it will be seen that
- both the settlement and the bluff stand upon beds of gravel capping
- horizontal beds of grey tuff. The gravel of that portion of the
- settlement on the seaboard originally<span class="pagenum" id="Page_139">139</span>
- formed the line of a shingle
- beach. That portion of the settlement back from the sea stands upon
- ground which was originally marshy. In the central portions of the
- settlement this bed of gravel is very thick, perhaps 100 feet or so,
- but as you near the edge of the bluff it probably becomes thinner,
- until it finally dies out upon the flanks of the scarps.</p>
-
- <p>On the top of the bluff, the beds of gravel will, in every probability,
- be generally thinner than they are upon the lower level. The beds of
- tuff, which is a soft grey-coloured clay-like rock, produced by the
- solidification of volcanic mud, appear, when walking on the seaboard,
- to be horizontally stratified. If there is a dip inland, it is in all
- probability very slight. Here and there the beds slightly faulted.
- Taken as a whole we may consider these beds as being tolerably
- homogeneous, and an earthquake in passing through them would meet
- with but little reflection or refraction. At the junction of these
- beds with the overlying gravels, both reflection and refraction would
- comparatively be very great.</p>
-
- <p>On entering the gravel, as the wave would be passing into a less
- elastic medium, the direction of the wave would be bent towards the
- perpendicular to the line of junction, and the angle of emergence at
- the surface would consequently be augmented. At the surface certain
- reflection would also take place, but the chief reflections would be
- those at the junction of the tuff and the alluvium.</p>
-
- <p>Under the settlement it is probable that all the reflections which took
- place would be single. Thus wave fronts like <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub> advancing
- in a direction parallel to the line <i>a</i><sub>1</sub>; would be reflected in
- a direction <i>a</i><sub>2</sub> and give rise to a series of reflected waves
- <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>2</sub>. These are shown by thicker lines. Similarly all the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_140">140</span>neighbouring waves to the right and left of
- <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub> would give
- rise to a series of reflected waves. If the lines drawn representing
- wave fronts are districts of compression, then, where two of the
- lines cross each other, there would be double energy in producing
- compression. Similarly, districts of rarefaction might accord, and,
- again, compression of one wave might meet with the rarefaction
- of another and a neutralisation of effect take place. A diagram
- illustrating concurrence and interference of this description is given
- in Le Conte’s ‘Elements of Geology,’ p. 115. The interference which has
- been spoken of, however, is not the greatest which would occur. The
- greatest would probably be beneath the bluff and the scarps which run
- down to join the level ground below. This would be the case because it
- is a probability that there might not only be cases of interference of
- single reflected waves, but also of waves which had been not only twice
- but perhaps thrice reflected. For example, a wave like <span class="smcap">b</span><sub>1</sub>
- (which is parallel to <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub> of the first supposition),
- advancing in a direction parallel to <i>b</i><sub>1</sub> might be reflected
- along the line <i>b</i><sub>2</sub> giving rise to waves like <span class="smcap">b</span><sub>2</sub>,
- which in turn might be reflected along <i>b</i><sub>3</sub> giving rise to waves
- like <span class="smcap">b</span><sub>3</sub>. The number of districts where there would be
- concurrence and interference would, in consequence of the number of
- times waves might be reflected, be augmented. Here the violence of
- the shock would, at certain points, be considerably increased, but
- as a general result energy must be lost, so that even if some of the
- reflected waves found their way into the portion we have regarded as
- being in shadow, their intensity would not be so great as if they had
- entered it directly.</p>
-
- <p>The shaking down of loose materials from the sides of hills may be
- partially explained on the assumption of an increased disturbance due
- to interference.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquake bridges.</em>—In certain parts of South<span class="pagenum" id="Page_141">141</span> America there appear
- to exist tracts of ground which are practically exempt from earthquake
- shocks, whilst the whole country around is sometimes violently shaken.
- It would seem as if the shock passes beneath such a district as water
- passes beneath a bridge, and for this reason these districts have been
- christened ‘bridges.’</p>
-
- <p>This phenomenon appears to depend upon the nature of the underlying
- soil. When an elastic wave passes from one bed of rock to another of a
- different character, a certain portion of the wave is reflected, while
- the remainder of it is transmitted and refracted, and ‘bridges’ we
- may conceive of as occurring where the phenomenon of total reflection
- occurs.</p>
-
- <p>In the instances given of soft materials having proved good
- foundations, it was assumed that they had chiefly acted as absorbers
- of momentum. They have also acted as reflecting surfaces, and where no
- effects have been felt by those residing on them, this may have been
- the result of total reflection, and the soft beds thus have played the
- part of bridges.</p>
-
- <p>Fuchs gives an example taken from the records of the Syrian earthquake
- of 1837, where not only neighbouring villages suffered differently, but
- even neighbouring houses. In one case a house was entirely destroyed,
- whilst in the next house nothing was felt.</p>
-
- <p>In Japan, at a place called Choshi, about 55 miles east of the capital,
- earthquakes are but seldom felt, although the surrounding districts may
- be severely shaken.</p>
-
- <p>From descriptions of this place it would appear that there is a large
- basaltic boss rising in the midst of alluvial strata. The immunity from
- earthquakes in this district has probably given rise to the myth of
- the Kanam rock, which is a stone supposed to rest upon the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_142">142</span> head of a
- monstrous catfish (Namadzu), which by its writhings causes the shakings
- so often felt in this part of the world.<a id="FNanchor_35" href="#Footnote_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a></p>
-
- <p>Prof. D. S. Martin, writing on the earthquake of New England in 1874,
- says that it was felt at four points; it was felt in the heart of
- Brooklyn all within a circle of half a mile across; ‘and this fact
- would suggest that a ridge of rock perhaps approaches the surface at
- that point, though none is known to appear.’<a id="FNanchor_36" href="#Footnote_36" class="fnanchor">[36]</a></p>
-
- <p>The subject of special districts, which are more or less protected from
- severe shakings, will be again referred to, and it will be seen that
- after a seismic survey has been made even of a country like Japan,
- where there are on the average at least two earthquakes per day, it
- is possible to choose a place to build in as free from earthquakes as
- Great Britain.</p>
-
- <p><em>General examples of earthquake effects.</em>—The following examples of
- earthquake effects are drawn from Mallet’s account of the Neapolitan
- earthquake of 1857.</p>
-
- <p>At a town called Polla there was great destruction. Judging from
- the fissures in the parts that remained standing it seemed that the
- emergence of the shock had been more vertical in the upper part of the
- town than in the lower, proving that whatever had been the angle below,
- the hill had itself vibrated, which, being horizontal, had modified the
- angle of the fissures.</p>
-
- <p>Diano suffered but little, partly because it was well built, and partly
- on account of its situation, which was such that before the shock
- reached it the disturbance had to pass from beds of clay into nearly
- vertically placed beds of limestone. Also a great portion of the shock
- was cut off by the Vallone del Raccio to the north and north-west
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_143">143</span> of
- the town. Here the effects of the partial extinction of the wave on the
- ‘free outlaying stratum’ were visible in the masses of projected rock.</p>
-
- <p>Castellucio did not suffer because its well buttressed knoll was end
- on to the direction of shock, and on account of a barrier of vertical
- breccia beds protecting it upon the east.</p>
-
- <p>Pertosa stands on a mound. The destruction was least in the southern
- part of the town. From the relation of the beds of breccia on which the
- town stands, and the direction of the wave-path, it is evident that the
- southern part of the town received the force of the shock through a
- greater thickness of the breccia beds than the other parts did.</p>
-
- <p>Petina, standing on a level limestone spur jutting out from a mountain
- slope, suffered nothing, whilst Anletta five miles to the south-west,
- and Pertosa six miles distant, were in great part prostrated. (1) The
- terrace did not vibrate, and (2) between Petina and Anletta there is
- almost 6,000 feet of piled up limestone, so that any shock emergent at
- a steep angle had to pass up transversely through these beds.</p>
-
- <p><em>Protection of buildings.</em>—In addition to giving proper construction
- to our buildings, choosing proper foundations and positions for them,
- something might possibly be done to ward off the destructive effects of
- an earthquake. We read that the Temple of Diana at Ephesus was built on
- the edge of a marsh, in order to ward off the effect of earthquakes.
- Pliny tells us that the Capitol of Rome was saved by the Catacombs,
- and Elisée Reclus<a id="FNanchor_37" href="#Footnote_37" class="fnanchor">[37]</a> says that the Romans and Hellenes found out that
- caverns, wells, and quarries retarded the disturbance of the earth,
- and protected edifices in their neighbourhood.
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_144">144</span> The tower of Capua was
- saved by its numerous wells. Vivenzis asserts that in building the
- Capitol the Romans sunk wells to weaken the effects of terrestrial
- oscillations. Humboldt relates the same of the inhabitants of San
- Domingo.</p>
-
- <p>Quito is said to receive protection from the numerous cañons in the
- neighbourhood, whilst Lactacunga, fifteen miles distant, has often been
- destroyed.</p>
-
- <p>Similarly, it is extremely probable that many portions of Tokio have
- from time to time been protected more or less from the severe shocks of
- earthquakes by the numerous moats and deep canals which intersect it.</p>
-
- <p>Although we are not prepared to say how far artificial openings of this
- description are effectual in warding off the shocks of earthquakes,
- from theoretical considerations, and from the fact that their use has
- been discovered by persons who, in all probability, were without the
- means of making theoretical deductions, the suggestions which they
- offer are worthy of attention.</p>
-
- <p><em>General conclusions.</em>—The following are a few of the more important
- results which may be drawn from the preceding chapter:—</p>
-
- <p>1. In choosing a site for a house find out by the experience of others
- or experimental investigation the localities which are least disturbed.
- In some cases this will be upon the hills, in others in the valleys and
- on the plains.</p>
-
- <p>2. A wide open plain is less likely to be disturbed than a position on
- a hill.</p>
-
- <p>3. Avoid loose materials resting on harder strata.</p>
-
- <p>4. If the shakings are definite in direction, place the blank walls
- parallel to such directions, and the walls with many openings in them
- at right angles to such directions.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_145">145</span></p>
-
- <p>5. Avoid the edges of scarps or bluffs, both above and below.</p>
-
- <p>6. So arrange the openings in a wall, that for horizontal stresses the
- wall shall be of equal strength for all sections at right angles.</p>
-
- <p>7. Place lintels over flat arches of brick or stone.</p>
-
- <p>8. To withstand destructive shocks either rigidly follow one or other
- of the two systems of constructing an earthquake-proof building. The
- light building on loose foundations is the cheaper and probably the
- better.</p>
-
- <p>9. Let all portions of a building have their natural periods of
- vibration nearly equal.</p>
-
- <p>10. If it is a necessity that one portion of a building should have a very
- different period of vibration to the remainder, as for instance a
- brick chimney in a wooden house, it would seem advisable either to let these
- two portions be sufficiently free to have an independent motion,
- or else they must be bound together with great strength.</p>
-
- <p>11. Avoid heavy topped roofs and chimneys. If the foundations were free
- the roof might be heavy.</p>
-
- <p>12. In brick or stone work use good cement.</p>
-
- <p>13. Let archways curve into their abutments.</p>
-
- <p>14. Let roofs have a low pitch, and the tiles, especially those upon
- the ridges, be well secured.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_VIII">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_146">146</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER VIII.<br />
- <span class="subhead">EFFECTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON LAND.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- 1. Cracks and fissures—Materials discharged from
- fissures—Explanation of fissure phenomena. 2. Disturbances in
- lakes, rivers, springs, wells, fumaroles, &amp;c.—Explanation of
- these latter phenomena. 3. Permanent displacement of ground—On
- coast lines—Level tracts—Among mountains—Explanation of these
- movements.</div>
-
- <p><em>Cracks and fissures formed in the ground.</em>—Almost all large
- earthquakes have produced cracks in the ground. The cracks which were
- found in the ground at Yokohama (February 22, 1880) were about two or
- three inches wide, and from twenty to forty yards in length. They could
- be best seen as lines along a road running near the upper edge of some
- cliffs which overlook the sea at that place. The reason that cracks
- should have occurred in such a position rather than in others was
- probably owing to the greater motion at such a place, due to the face
- of the cliff being unsupported, and there being no resistance opposed
- to its forward motion. It often happens that earthquake cracks are many
- feet in width. At the Calabrian earthquake of 1783, one or two of the
- crevasses which were formed were more than 100 feet in width and 200
- feet in depth. Their lengths varied from half a mile to a mile.<a
- id="FNanchor_38" href="#Footnote_38" class="fnanchor">[38]</a>
- Besides these large cracks, many smaller ones of one or two feet in
- breadth and of great length were formed. In
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_147">147</span>the large fissures many
- houses were engulfed. Subsequent excavations showed that by the closing
- of the fissures these had been jammed together to form one compact
- mass. These cracks are usually more or less parallel, and at the same
- time parallel to some topographical feature, like a range of mountains.
- For example, the cracks which were formed by the Mississippi earthquake
- of 1812 ran from north-east to south-west parallel to the Alleghanies.
- By succeeding shocks these crevasses are sometimes closed and sometimes
- opened still wider. Their permanency will also depend upon the nature
- of the materials in which they are made.</p>
-
- <p>During an earthquake large cracks may suddenly open and shut.</p>
-
- <p>During the convulsions of 1692 which destroyed Port Royal, it is said
- that many of the fissures which were formed, opened and shut. In some
- of these, people were entirely swallowed up and buried. In others they
- were trapped by the middle, and even by the neck, where if not killed
- instantaneously they perished slowly. Subsequently their projecting
- parts formed food for dogs.<a id="FNanchor_39" href="#Footnote_39"
- class="fnanchor">[39]</a></p>
-
- <p>The earthquake which, July 18, 1880, shook the Philippines caused many
- fissures to be found, which in some places were so numerous that the
- ground was broken up into steps. Near to the village of San Antonio the
- soil was so disturbed that the surface of a field of sugar-canes was
- so altered that in some cases the top of one row of full grown plants
- was on a level with the roots of the next. Into one such fissure a boat
- disappeared, and into another, a child.</p>
-
- <p>Subsequently the child was excavated, and its body, which was found a
- short distance below the surface, was completely crushed.<a id="FNanchor_40"
- href="#Footnote_40" class="fnanchor">[40]</a></p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_148">148</span></p>
-
- <p>At the time of the Riobamba earthquake, not only were men engulfed,
- but animals, like mules, also sank into the fissures which were formed.</p>
-
- <p>The fissures which were formed at the time of the Owen’s Valley
- earthquake in 1872 extended for miles nearly parallel to the
- neighbouring Sierras. In some places the ground between the fissures
- sank twenty or thirty feet, and at one place about three miles east of
- Independence, a portion of the road was carried eighteen feet to the
- south by a fissure.<a id="FNanchor_41" href="#Footnote_41"
- class="fnanchor">[41]</a></p>
-
- <p>Speaking generally, it may be said that all large earthquakes are
- accompanied by the formation of fissures. The Japanese have a saying
- that at the time of a large earthquake persons must run to a bamboo
- grove.</p>
-
- <p>The object of this is to escape the danger of being engulfed in
- fissures, the ground beneath a bamboo grove being so netted together
- with fine roots that it is almost impossible for it to be rent open.</p>
-
- <p><em>Materials discharged from fissures.</em>—Together with the opening of
- cracks in the earth it often has happened that water, mud, vapours,
- gases, and other materials, have been ejected.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the Mississippi earthquake water, mixed with sand and
- mud, was thrown out with such violence that it spurted above the tops
- of the highest trees. In Italy such phenomena have often been repeated.</p>
-
- <p>From the fissures which were formed in 1692 at the time of the
- earthquakes in Sicily, water issued which in some instances was
- salt.<a id="FNanchor_42" href="#Footnote_42" class="fnanchor">[42]</a></p>
-
- <p>By the Cachar earthquake (January 10, 1869) numerous fissures were
- formed parallel to the banks of a river, from this water and mud were
- ejected. Dr. Oldham, who describes this earthquake, says that the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_149">149</span>
- first shot of dry mud or sand was mistaken for smoke or steam. The
- water was foul, and hotter than surface water at the time, but only
- slightly so; and the sulphurous smell was nothing more than you would
- perceive in stirring up the mud at the bottom of any stagnant pool
- which had lain undisturbed for some time.<a id="FNanchor_43"
- href="#Footnote_43" class="fnanchor">[43]</a></p>
-
- <p>In 1755, when Tauris was destroyed, boiling water issued from the
- cracks which were formed. Similar phenomena were witnessed at a place
- eight miles from La Banca in Mexico, in the year 1820. Part of this hot
- water was pure and part was muddy.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes the water which has been ejected has been so muddy that the
- mud has been collected to form small hills. This was the case at the
- time of the Riobamba earthquake. The mud in this case consisted partly
- of coal, fragments of augite, and shells of infusoria.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the Jamaica earthquake men who had fallen into crevices
- were in some cases thrown out again by issuing water.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes, as has already been mentioned, vapour, gases, and even
- flames issue from fissures. Vapour of sulphur appears to be exceedingly
- common. Kluge says that many fish were killed in consequence of the
- sulphurous vapours which rose in the sea near to the coast of New
- Zealand in 1855.</p>
-
- <p>On December 14, 1797, an insupportable smell of sulphur was observed to
- have accompanied the earthquake which at that time shook Cumana, which
- was greatest when the disturbance was greatest.</p>
-
- <p>Sulphurous fumes which were combustible were belched out of the
- earth at the time of the Jamaica earthquake in 1692. The smell which
- accompanied this <span class="pagenum" id="Page_150">150</span>
- was so powerful that it caused a general sickness
- which swept away about 3,000 persons.<a id="FNanchor_44" href="#Footnote_44"
- class="fnanchor">[44]</a></p>
-
- <p>From the fissures formed at Concepcion in 1835, water, which was black
- and fœtid, issued.<a id="FNanchor_45" href="#Footnote_45" class="fnanchor">[45]</a></p>
-
- <p>The earthquakes of New England in 1727 were accompanied by the
- formation of fissures, from which sand and water boiled out in
- sufficient quantity to form a quagmire. In some places ash and sulphur
- are said to have been ejected.</p>
-
- <p>At one house the stink of sulphur accompanying the earthquake was so
- great that the family could not bear to remain in doors.<a id="FNanchor_46"
- href="#Footnote_46" class="fnanchor">[46]</a></p>
-
- <p>Emanations of gas sometimes appear to have burst out from submarine
- sources.</p>
-
- <p>Thus the earthquake at Lima, in March, 1865, was accompanied with great
- agitation of the water and an odour of sulphuretted and carburetted
- hydrogen. This former gas was developed to such an extent that the
- white paint of the U.S. ship ‘Lancaster’ was blackened.<a id="FNanchor_47"
- href="#Footnote_47" class="fnanchor">[47]</a> With the
- smell, flames have sometimes been observed, as, for instance, at the
- time of the Lisbon earthquake.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the earthquakes of 1811 and 1813, in the Mississippi
- valley, steam and smoke issued from some of the fissures which were
- formed.</p>
-
- <p>Instances are recorded where stones have been shot up from fissures
- unaccompanied by water, as, for instance, at the earthquake of Pasto
- (January, 1834). It is imagined that the propelling power must have
- been the sudden expansion of escaping gases.</p>
-
- <p>It has been suggested that flames seen above fissures
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_151">151</span>might perhaps
- be due to the burning of materials like sulphur. Mr. D. Forbes, who
- examined the effects of the earthquakes of Mendoza, which were felt for
- a distance of 1,200 miles, says that where the hard rock came to the
- surface there were no traces of fissures, these being entirely confined
- to the alluvium. The rumours of fire and smoke having appeared at some
- of the fissures were without foundation, the presumed smoke being
- nothing but dust.<a id="FNanchor_48" href="#Footnote_48" class="fnanchor">[48]</a></p>
-
- <p>In addition to flames lights appear often to have been observed, the
- origin of which cannot be easily explained.</p>
-
- <p>The earthquake of November 22, 1751, at Genoa is said to have been
- accompanied by a light like that of a prodigious fire which seemed to
- arise out of the ground.<a id="FNanchor_49" href="#Footnote_49" class="fnanchor">[49]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Explanation of fissure phenomena.</em>—The manner in which fissures are
- formed has already been explained when referring to the want of support
- in the face of hills (page 136).</p>
-
- <p>Similar remarks may be applied to the banks of rivers and all
- depressions, whether natural or artificial, which have a steep slope.
- At such places the wave of shock emerges on a free surface, which,
- being unsupported in the direction of its motion, tends to tear itself
- away from the material behind, and form a fissure parallel to the face
- of the free surface. The distance of the fissure from the face of the
- free surface will, theoretically, be equal to half the amplitude of the
- wave of motion, one half tending to move forwards, and the other half
- backwards. The reason that water and other materials rush forth from
- fissures has been explained by Schüler as being due to cracks having
- been opened through impervious <span class="pagenum" id="Page_152">152</span>
- strata, which, before the earthquake,
- by their continuity prevented the rising of subterranean water under
- hydrostatic pressure.<a id="FNanchor_50" href="#Footnote_50" class="fnanchor">[50]</a></p>
-
- <p>Kluge explains the coming up of the waters as being due to the same
- causes which he considers may be the origin of disturbances in the sea.</p>
-
- <p>The most reasonable explanations of the eruption of water, mud, sand,
- and gas through fissures are those given by Oldham and Mallet in their
- account of the Cachar earthquake.</p>
-
- <p>In the case of a horizontal shock passing through a bed of ooze or
- water-bearing strata, the elastic wave will tend to pack up the water
- during the forward motion to such an extent that it will flow or
- spout up through any aperture communicating with the surface. By the
- repetition of these movements causing ejections, sand or mud cones,
- like those produced by a volcanic eruption, may be formed, and by a
- similar action water may be shot violently up out of wells, as was the
- case in Jamaica in 1692.</p>
-
- <p>If an emergent wave acts through a water-bearing bed upon a
- superincumbent layer of impervious material, this upper layer is,
- during the upward motion, by its inertia suddenly pressed down upon the
- latter.</p>
-
- <p>This pressure is equal to that which would raise the upper layer to
- a height equal to the amplitude of the motion of an earth particle,
- and with a velocity at least equal to the mean velocity of the earth
- particle resolved in the vertical direction.</p>
-
- <p>For a moment the water-bearing strata receive an enormous squeeze, and
- the water or mud starts up through any crevice which may be formed
- leading to the surface.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_153">153</span></p>
-
- <p>From this we see that liquids may rise far beyond the level due to
- hydrostatic pressure.<a id="FNanchor_51" href="#Footnote_51" class="fnanchor">[51]</a></p>
-
- <p>Volger has attributed the origin of lights or flames appearing above
- fissures to the friction which must take place between various rocky
- materials at the time when the fissures are opened. As confirmatory of
- this he refers to instances where similar phenomena have been observed
- at the time of landslips. At the time of these landslips the heat
- developed by friction has been sufficiently intense to convert water
- into steam, the tension of which threw mud and earth into the air like
- the explosion of a mine.<a id="FNanchor_52" href="#Footnote_52" class="fnanchor">[52]</a></p>
-
- <p>The gas eruptions which occasionally take place with earthquakes are
- probably due to the opening of fissures communicating with reservoirs
- or strata charged with products of natural distillation, or chemical
- action, which previously had accumulated beneath impervious strata. Of
- the existence of such gases we have abundant evidence. In coal mines we
- have fire damp which escapes in increased quantities with a lowering of
- the barometrical pressure. In volcanic regions we have many examples of
- natural springs of carbon dioxide.</p>
-
- <p>These various gases sometimes escape in quantity, or erupt without
- the occurrence of earthquakes. Rossi mentions an instance where a few
- years ago quantities of fish were killed by the eruption of gas in the
- Tiber, near Rome. Another instance is one which occurred at Follonica
- on April 6, 1874. On the morning of that day many of the streets and
- roads were covered with the dead bodies of rats and mice. It seemed as
- if it had rained rats. From the facts that the bodies of the creatures
- seemed healthy, <span class="pagenum" id="Page_154">154</span>
- that the destruction had happened suddenly, and not
- come on gradually like an epidemic, it was supposed that they had been
- destroyed by an emanation of carbon dioxide. The fact that many of them
- lay in long lines suggested the idea that they had been endeavouring
- to escape at the time of the eruption.<a id="FNanchor_53" href="#Footnote_53" class="fnanchor">[53]</a> If we can suppose sudden
- developments of gas like this to have occasionally accompanied
- earthquakes, we may sometimes have the means of accounting for the
- sickness which has been felt.</p>
-
- <p><em>Disturbances in lakes.</em>—It has often been observed that, at the time
- of large earthquakes, lakes have been thrown into violent agitation,
- and their waters have been raised or lowered. At the time of the great
- Lisbon earthquake, not only were the waters of European lakes thrown
- into a state of oscillation, but similar effects were produced in the
- great lakes of North America. In some instances, as in the case of
- small ponds, these movements may be produced by the horizontal backward
- and forward motion of the ground. At other times they are probably due
- to an actual tipping of a portion of their basins. Movements like these
- latter will be again referred to in the chapter on Earth Pulsations.
- On January 27, 1856, there was a shock of earthquake at Bailyborough,
- Ireland, which occasioned an adjacent lough to overflow its banks
- and rush into the town with great impetuosity. In returning it swept
- away two men, leaving behind a great quantity of pike and eels of a
- prodigious growth.<a id="FNanchor_54" href="#Footnote_54" class="fnanchor">[54]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Disturbances in rivers.</em>—Just as lakes have been disturbed, so also
- have there been sudden disturbances in rivers. Sometimes these have
- overflowed their banks, whilst at other times they have been suddenly
- dried up. In certain cases the reason that a portion of a river should
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_155">155</span>have become dry has been very apparent, as, for instance, at the time
- of the Zenkoji earthquake in Japan in 1847, when the Shikuma-gawa
- became partly dry in consequence of the large masses of earth which
- had been shaken down from overhanging cliffs damming a portion of
- its course, and thus forming, first, lakes, and subsequently, new
- water-courses. As another example, out of the many which might be
- quoted, may be mentioned the sudden drying up of the river Aboat,
- a tributary of the Magat, in the Philippine Islands, on July 27,
- 1881, shortly after a severe shock of earthquake. The water of this
- river ceased to flow for two hours, after which it reappeared with
- considerable increase of volume and of a reddish colour. Signor E. A.
- Casariego, who describes this, remarks that the phenomenon could easily
- be explained through the slipping down of the steep banks in narrow
- parts of its upper valley, by which means its flow had been obstructed
- until the water had time to accumulate and pass over or demolish the
- obstruction.</p>
-
- <p>After the earthquake of Belluno (June 29, 1873), the torrent Tesa,
- which is ordinarily limpid, became very muddy.<a id="FNanchor_55" href="#Footnote_55" class="fnanchor">[55]</a> Similar phenomena
- have been observed even in Britain, as, for instance, in 1787, when, at
- the time of a shock which was felt in Glasgow, there was a temporary
- stoppage in the waters of the Clyde. Again, in 1110, there was a
- dreadful earthquake at Shrewsbury and Nottingham, and the Trent became
- so low at Nottingham that people walked over it.</p>
-
- <p>The earthquake of 1158, which was felt in many parts of England, was
- accompanied by the drying up of the Thames, which was so low that it
- could be crossed on foot even at London.<a id="FNanchor_56" href="#Footnote_56" class="fnanchor">[56]</a></p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_156">156</span></p>
-
- <p>Facts analogous to these are mentioned in the accounts of many large
- earthquakes. Sometimes rivers only come muddy or change their colour.
- In an account of the Lisbon earthquake we read that some of the rivers
- near Neufchâtel suddenly became muddy.<a id="FNanchor_57" href="#Footnote_57" class="fnanchor">[57]</a></p>
-
- <p>At other times large waves are formed. Thus the earthquake of Kansas
- (April 24, 1867) apparently created a disturbance in the rivers at
- Manhattan, which rolled in a heavy wave from the north to the south
- bank.<a id="FNanchor_58" href="#Footnote_58" class="fnanchor">[58]</a></p>
-
- <p>Sometimes curious phenomena have happened with regard to rivers without
- the occurrence of earthquakes. Thus, for instance, on November 27,
- 1838, there was a simultaneous stoppage of the Teviot, Clyde, and Nith.</p>
-
- <p>In these rivers similar phenomena have been observed in previous years.</p>
-
- <p>Again, on January 1, 1755, there was a sudden sinking of the river
- Frooyd, near Pontypool. This appears to have been due to the water
- sinking into chasms which were suddenly opened.<a id="FNanchor_59" href="#Footnote_59" class="fnanchor">[59]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Effects produced in springs, wells, fumaroles, &amp;c.</em>—Springs also are
- often affected by earthquakes. Sometimes the character of their waters
- change; those which were pure become muddy, whilst those which were hot
- have their temperature altered.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes springs have been dried up, whilst at other times new springs
- have been formed.</p>
-
- <p>This latter was the case in New England (October 27, 1727). In some
- places springs were formed, whilst at other places they were either
- entirely or partly dried up.<a id="FNanchor_60" href="#Footnote_60" class="fnanchor">[60]</a></p>
-
- <p>At and near Lisbon, in 1755, some fountains became
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_157">157</span>muddy, others
- decreased, others increased, and others dried up. At Montreux, Aigle,
- and other places, springs became turbid.</p>
-
- <p>The baths at Toplitz, in Bohemia, which were discovered in
- <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 762, were seriously affected by the same earthquake.
- Previous to the earthquake it is said that they had always given a
- constant supply of hot water. At this time, however, the chief spring
- sent up vast quantities of water and ran over. One hour before this
- it had grown turbid and flowed muddy. After this it stopped for about
- one minute, but recommenced to flow with prodigious violence, driving
- before it considerable quantities of reddish ochre. Finally, it settled
- back to its original clear state and flowed as before.<a id="FNanchor_61" href="#Footnote_61" class="fnanchor">[61]</a></p>
-
- <p>In 1855, at the earthquake of Wallis, many new springs burst forth, and
- some of these in Nicolai Thale were so rich in iron that they quickly
- formed a deposit of ochre.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the Belluno earthquake (June 29, 1873), a hot spring, La
- Vena d’Oro, suddenly became red.<a id="FNanchor_62" href="#Footnote_62" class="fnanchor">[62]</a></p>
-
- <p>The following examples of like changes are taken from the writings of
- Fuchs.<a id="FNanchor_63" href="#Footnote_63" class="fnanchor">[63]</a></p>
-
- <p>In 1738 the hot springs of St. Euphema rose considerably in their
- temperature.</p>
-
- <p>During the earthquake of October, 1848, the hot springs of Ardebil,
- which usually had a temperature of from 44° to 46° C., rose so high
- that their temperature was sufficient to cause scalding.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the earthquake of Wallis, in 1855, the temperature of
- hot springs rose 7°, and the quantity of water increased three times.</p>
-
- <p>During the earthquake of 1835 in Chili, the springs
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_158">158</span>of Cauquenes fell
- from 118° to 92° F. Subsequently, however, they again rose.</p>
-
- <p>Fumaroles are similarly disturbed. Thus, at the time of the earthquakes
- of Martinique (September, 1875), the fumaroles there showed an abnormal
- activity.<a id="FNanchor_64" href="#Footnote_64" class="fnanchor">[64]</a></p>
-
- <p>Wells often appear to be acted upon in the same manner as springs.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the California earthquake (April, 1855), the level of
- the water in certain wells was raised ten to twelve feet.</p>
-
- <p>A consequence of the earthquake at Neufchâtel, in 1749, was to fill
- some of the wells with mud.<a id="FNanchor_65" href="#Footnote_65" class="fnanchor">[65]</a> At Constantinople, on September 2,
- 1754, wells became dry.<a id="FNanchor_66" href="#Footnote_66" class="fnanchor">[66]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Explanation of the above phenomena.</em>—That the water in springs and
- wells should be caused to rise at the time of an earthquake, admits of
- explanation on the supposition of compressions taking place similar
- to those which cause the rise of water in fissures. That the water in
- wells and springs should be rendered turbid, is partly explained on the
- supposition of more or less dislocation taking place in the earthy or
- rocky cavities in which they are contained or through which they flow.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of a large earthquake it is extremely probable that there
- is a general disturbance in the lines of circulation of subterranean
- waters and gases throughout the shaken area. By these disturbances, new
- waters may be brought to the surface, two or more lines of circulation
- may be united, and the flow of a spring or supply of a well be
- augmented. Fissures, through which waters reached the surface, may be
- closed, wells may become dry, or springs may cease to flow, hot springs
- may have their <span class="pagenum" id="Page_159">159</span>
- temperature lowered by the additions of cold water
- from another source, and, in a similar manner, waters may be altered
- in their mineralisation. An important point to be remembered in this
- consideration is the mutual dependence of various underground water
- supplies, and the area over which any given supply may circulate. A
- well in the higher part of Lincoln Heath is said to be governed by the
- river Trent, which is ten miles distant; when the river rises the well
- rises in proportion, and when the river falls the water in the well
- falls.<a id="FNanchor_67" href="#Footnote_67" class="fnanchor">[67]</a></p>
-
- <p>The change which is usually observed in hot springs is, that before or
- with earthquakes they increase in temperature, but afterwards sink back
- to their normal state. This increase in temperature may possibly be due
- to communication being opened with new or deeper centres of volcanic
- activity, or a temporarily increased rate of flow.</p>
-
- <p>That the water issuing from newly formed fissures or springs should
- be hot, might be explained on the supposition of its arising from a
- considerable depth, or from some volcanic centre. It might also be
- attributed to the heat developed by friction at the opening of the
- fissures. These changes which earthquakes produce upon the underground
- circulation of waters are phenomena deserving especial attention.
- Although we know much about the circulation of surface water, it is but
- little that we yet know about the movement of the streams hidden from
- view, from which these surface waters have their sources. Earthquakes
- may be regarded as gigantic experiments on the circulatory system of
- the earth, which, if properly interpreted, may yield information of
- scientific and utilitarian value.</p>
-
- <p>The sudden elevations, depressions, or lateral shifting of large tracts
- of country at the time of destructive earthquakes
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_160">160</span> are phenomena
- with which all students of geology are familiar. In most cases these
- displacements have been permanent; and evidences of many of the
- movements which occurred within the memory of man, remain as witnesses
- of the terrible convulsions with which they were accompanied.</p>
-
- <p><em>Movements on coast lines and level tracts.</em>—At the time of the
- great earthquake of Concepcion, on February 20, 1835, much of the
- neighbouring coast line was suddenly elevated four or five feet
- above sea level. This, however, subsequently sank until it was only
- two feet. A rocky flat, off the island of Santa Maria, was lifted
- above high-water mark, and left covered with ‘gaping and putrefying
- mussel-shells, still attached to the bed on which they had lived.’ The
- northern end of the island itself was raised ten feet and the southern
- extremity eight feet.<a id="FNanchor_68" href="#Footnote_68" class="fnanchor">[68]</a></p>
-
- <p>By the earthquake of 1839, the island of Lemus, in the Chonos
- Archipelago, was suddenly elevated eight feet.<a id="FNanchor_69" href="#Footnote_69" class="fnanchor">[69]</a></p>
-
- <p>Of movements like these, especially along the western shores of South
- America, Darwin, who paid so much attention to this subject, has given
- many examples. In 1822, the shore near Valparaiso was suddenly lifted
- up, and Darwin tells us that he heard it confidently asserted ‘that a
- sentinel on duty, immediately after the shock, saw a part of a fort
- which previously was not within the line of his vision, and this would
- indicate that the uplifting was not vertical.’<a id="FNanchor_70" href="#Footnote_70" class="fnanchor">[70]</a> That the large areas
- of land should be shifted permanently in horizontal directions, as well
- as vertically, we should anticipate from the observations which we are
- able to make upon large fissures which are caused by earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>Another remarkable example of sudden movement in
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_161">161</span>the rocky crust is
- that which took place during the earthquakes of 1811–12 in the valley
- of the Mississippi, near to the mouth of the Ohio, which was convulsed
- to such a degree, that lakes, twenty miles in extent, were formed
- in the course of an hour. This country, which is called the ‘sunk
- country,’ extends some seventy to eighty miles north and south, and
- thirty miles east and west.<a id="FNanchor_71" href="#Footnote_71" class="fnanchor">[71]</a></p>
-
- <p>In the ‘Gentleman’s Magazine’ we read of the little territory of
- Causa Nova, in Calabria, being sunk twenty-nine feet into the earth
- by an earthquake, without throwing down a house. The inhabitants,
- being warned by a noise, escaped into the fields, and only five were
- killed.<a id="FNanchor_72" href="#Footnote_72" class="fnanchor">[72]</a></p>
-
- <p>Other examples of these permanent dislocations of strata are to be
- found in almost every text-book on geology.</p>
-
- <p><em>Geological changes produced.</em>—Passing over the accounts of earth
- movements which are more or less fictitious, and confining our
- attention to the well authenticated facts, we see at once the important
- part which earthquakes have played as agents working geological
- changes. Even in the nineteenth century long tracts of coast, as in
- Chili and New Zealand, have been raised, whilst other areas, like the
- Delta of the Indus, have been sunk. Sir H. Bartle Frere, speaking about
- the disturbance which took place in his latter region in 1819, remarks
- that all the canals drawn from the Fullalee River ceased to run for
- about three days, probably indicating a general upheaval of the lower
- part of the canal. In consequence of the earthquakes in former times
- it is not unlikely that water-courses have ceased to flow, water has
- decreased in wells, and districts have been depopulated.<a id="FNanchor_73" href="#Footnote_73" class="fnanchor">[73]</a></p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_162">162</span></p>
-
- <p>Sometimes these changes have taken place gradually and sometimes with
- violence. Mountains have been toppled over, valleys have been filled,
- cities have been submerged or buried.</p>
-
- <p>With the records of these convulsions before us, we see that seismic
- energy yet exhibits a terrible activity in changing the features of the
- globe.</p>
-
- <p><em>Reason of these movements.</em>—To formulate a single reason for these
- catastrophes would be difficult. Where they are of the nature of
- landslips, or materials have been dislodged from mountain sides, the
- cause is evidently the sudden movement of this ground acting upon
- strata not held together in a sufficiently stable condition. A similar
- explanation may be given for the sudden elevations or depressions of
- strata in a district removed from the centre where the disturbance had
- its origin. The seismic effort exhibits itself in a certain area round
- its origin as a sudden push, and by this push, strata are fractured and
- caused to move relatively to each other.</p>
-
- <p>At or near to the origin of an earthquake it might be argued that it
- was the sudden falling of rocky strata towards a position of stable
- equilibrium that caused the shaking, and in such a case the movements
- referred to may be regarded as the cause rather than the effect of an
- earthquake.</p>
-
- <p>A subject closely connected with the sudden dislocation of strata,
- is the production of secondary or consequent earthquakes, due to the
- disturbance of ground in a critical state (see p. 248).</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_IX">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_163">163</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER IX.<br />
- <span class="subhead">DISTURBANCES IN THE OCEAN.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Sea vibrations—Cause of vibratory blows—Sea waves: Preceding
- earthquakes; Succeeding earthquakes—Magnitude of waves—Waves
- as recorded in countries distant from the origin—Records on
- tide gauges—Waves without earthquakes—Cause of waves—Phenomena
- difficult of explanation—Velocity of propagation—Depth of the
- ocean—Examples of calculations—Comparison of velocities of
- earthquake waves with velocities which ought to exist from the
- known depth of the ocean.</div>
-
- <p><em>Sea vibrations.</em>—Whilst residing in Japan I have had many
- opportunities of conversing with persons who had experienced
- earthquakes when on board ships, and it has often happened that these
- same earthquakes have been recorded on the shore. For example, at the
- time of every moderately severe earthquake which has shaken Yokohama,
- the same disturbance has been felt on board the ships lying in the
- adjoining harbour. In some cases the effect had been as if the ship
- was grounding; in others, as if a number of sharp jerks were being
- given to the cable. The effect produced upon a man-of-war lying in the
- Yokohama harbour on the evening of March 11, 1881, was described to me
- as a ‘violent irresistible shaking.’ Vessels eighty miles at sea have
- recorded and timed shocks which were felt like sudden blows. These were
- accompanied by a noise described as a ‘dull rattle like thunder.’</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_164">164</span></p>
-
- <p>In none of the cases here quoted was any disturbance of the water
- observed.</p>
-
- <p>The great earthquake of Lisbon was felt by vessels on the Atlantic,
- fifty miles away from shore.</p>
-
- <p>On February 10, 1716, the vessels in the harbour of New Pisco were so
- violently shaken that both ropes and masts were broken, and yet no
- motion in the water was observed. Some have described these shocks like
- those which would be produced by the sudden dropping of large masses of
- ballast in the hold of the vessel. Other cases are known where rigging
- was damaged, and even cannon have been jerked up and down from the
- decks on which they rested.</p>
-
- <p><em>Cause of vibratory blows.</em>—From the rattling sound which has
- accompanied some of these submarine shocks, many of which, it may be
- remarked, have never been recorded as earthquakes upon neighbouring
- shores, it does not seem improbable that they may have been the result
- of the sudden condensation of volumes of steam produced by submarine
- volcanic eruptions.</p>
-
- <p>As confirmatory of this supposition we have the fact, that many of
- the marine disturbances which might be called ‘sea-quakes,’ have been
- observed in places which are close to, or in the line of, volcanic
- vents. Thus, M. Daussy, who has paid special attention to this subject,
- has collected evidence to show that a large number of shocks have been
- felt by vessels in that portion of the Atlantic between Cape Palamas,
- on the west coast of Africa, and Cape St. Roque, on the east coast of
- South America.<a id="FNanchor_74" href="#Footnote_74" class="fnanchor">[74]</a></p>
-
- <p>Some of the vessels only felt shocks and tremblings, but others saw
- smoke, and some even collected floating ashes. In considering the
- submarine shocks of this particular
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_165">165</span> area, we must bear in mind that it
- lies in the line of Iceland, the west coast of Scotland, the Azores,
- Canaries, Cape de Verd Islands, St. Helena, and other places, all of
- which, if not at present in volcanic activity, shew evidence of having
- been so within recent times. The connection between volcanic action and
- earthquakes will be again referred to.</p>
-
- <p><em>Sea waves.</em>—Although in the above-mentioned instances sea waves have
- not been noticed, it is by no means uncommon to find that destructive
- earthquakes have been accompanied by waves of an enormous size, which,
- if the earthquake has originated beneath the sea, have, subsequently
- to the shaking, rolled in upon the land, to create more devastation
- than the actual earthquake. It may, however, be mentioned that a few
- exceptional cases exist when it is said that the sea wave has preceded
- the earthquake, as, for example, at Smyrna, on September 8, 1852.</p>
-
- <p>Again, at the earthquake in St. Thomas, in 1868, it is said that the
- water receded shortly <em>before</em> the first shock. When it returned, after
- the second shock, it was sufficient to throw the U.S. ship ‘Monagahela’
- high and dry.<a id="FNanchor_75" href="#Footnote_75" class="fnanchor">[75]</a></p>
-
- <p>Another American ship, the ‘Wateree,’ was also lost in 1868 by being
- swept a quarter of a mile inland by the sea wave which inundated
- Arequippa.</p>
-
- <p>Much of the great destruction which occurred at the time of the great
- Lisbon earthquake was due to a series of great sea waves, thirty to
- sixty feet higher than the highest tide, which swamped the town. These
- came in about an hour after the town had been shattered by the motion
- of the ground.</p>
-
- <p>The first motion in the waters was their withdrawal, which was
- sufficient to completely uncover the bar at the mouth of the Tagus. At
- Cadiz, the first wave, which was<span class="pagenum" id="Page_166">166</span>
- the greatest, is said to have been sixty feet in height. Fortunately
- the devastating effect which this would have produced was partially
- warded off by cliffs.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the Jamaica earthquake (1692) the sea drew back for a
- distance of a mile.</p>
-
- <p>In South America sea waves are common accompaniments of large
- earthquakes, and they are regarded with more fear than the actual
- earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>On October 28, 1724, Lima was destroyed, and on the evening of that day
- the sea rose in a wave eighty feet over Callao. Out of twenty-three
- ships in the harbour, nineteen were sunk, and four others were carried
- far inland. The first movement which is usually observed is a drawing
- back of the waters, and this is so well known to precede the inrush of
- large waves, that many of the inhabitants in South America have used it
- as a timely warning to escape towards the hills, and save themselves
- from the terrible reaction which, on more than one occasion, has so
- quickly followed.</p>
-
- <p>At Caldera, near to Copiapo, on May 9, 1877, which was the time when
- Iquique was devastated, the first motion which was observed in the sea
- was that it silently drew back for over 200 feet, after which it rose
- as a wave over five feet high. At some places the water came in as
- waves from twenty to eighty feet in height.</p>
-
- <p>At Talcahuano, on the coast of Chili, in 1835, there was a repetition
- of the phenomena which accompanied the destruction of Penco in 1730
- and 1751. About forty minutes after the first shock, the sea suddenly
- retired. Soon afterwards, however, it returned in a wave twenty feet
- high, the reflex of which swept everything towards the sea. These
- phenomena were repeated three times.<a id="FNanchor_76" href="#Footnote_76" class="fnanchor">[76]</a></p>
-
- <p>When Callao and Lima were destroyed, in 1746, the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_167">167</span>sea first drew back,
- then came in as waves, four or five minutes after the earthquake.
- Altogether, between October 28 and February 24, 451 shocks were
- counted. At one time the sea came in eighty feet above its usual
- level. One account says that the large waves came in forty-one and a
- half hours after the first shock, and seventeen and a half hours after
- comparative tranquillity had prevailed.<a id="FNanchor_77" href="#Footnote_77" class="fnanchor">[77]</a></p>
-
- <p>At the eruption of Monte Nuovo, near Naples, in September 27, 1538, the
- water drew back forty feet, so that the whole gulf of Baja became dry.</p>
-
- <p>In 1696, at the time of the Catanian earthquake, the sea is said to
- have gone back 2,000 fathoms. Instances are recorded where the sea has
- receded several miles.</p>
-
- <p>The time taken for the flowing back of the sea is usually very
- different. Sometimes it has only been five or six minutes, whilst at
- other times over half an hour, and there are records where the time is
- said to have been still longer.</p>
-
- <p>Thus, at the earthquake of Santa (June 17, 1678), the sea is stated to
- have gone as far back as the eye could reach, and did not rise again
- for twenty-four hours, when it flooded everything.</p>
-
- <p>In 1690 at Pisco the sea went back two miles, and did not return for
- three hours. When it returns it does so with violence, and examples of
- the heights to which it may reach have been given. The greatest sea
- wave yet recorded, according to Fuchs, is one which, on October 6,
- 1737, broke on the coast of Lupatka, 210 feet in height.</p>
-
- <p>There are, however, cases known where the sea has returned as gradually
- as it went out. Thus, on December
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_168">168</span>4, 1854, when Acapulco was
- destroyed, the sea is said to have returned as gently as it went out.</p>
-
- <p>When sea waves have travelled long distances from their origin, as,
- for instance, whenever a South American wave crosses the Pacific to
- Japan, the phenomena which are observed are like those which were
- observed at Acapulco; the sea falls and rises, at intervals of from ten
- minutes to half an hour, to heights of from six to ten feet, without
- the slightest appearance of a wave. Its phenomenon is like that of an
- unusually high tide, which repeats itself several times per hour. Even
- if we watch distant rocks with a telescope, although the surface of the
- ocean may be as smooth as the surface of a mirror, there is not the
- slightest visible evidence of what is popularly called a wave. The sea
- being once set in motion it continues to move as waves of oscillation
- for a considerable time. In 1877, as observed in Japan, the motion
- continued for nearly a whole day. The period and amplitude of the rise
- and fall were variable, usually it quickly reached a maximum, and then
- died out gradually. As observed in a self-recording tide gauge at San
- Francisco, the disturbance lasted for about four days. A diagram of
- this is here given. In its general appearance it is very similar to the
- records of other earthquake waves. The large waves represent the usual
- six hours rise and fall of the tides; usually these are fairly smooth
- curves. Superimposed on the large waves are the smaller zigzag curves
- of the earthquake disturbance, lasting with greater or less intensity
- for several days. As these curves are drawn to scale—horizontally for
- hours, and vertically one fifth inch to the foot, to show the extent of
- the rise and fall—they will be easily understood.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes, as in the present example, the first movement in the
- waters is that of an incoming wave. In many
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_169">169</span> instances, however, this
- observation may be due to the slow and more gentle phenomena of the
- previous drawing out of the water, which in a steep waste, or when the
- water is rough, would be difficult to observe, not having been remarked.</p>
-
- <p>The distance to which these sea waves have extended has usually been
- exceedingly great.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p169.jpg" width="692" height="517" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 28.</span>—Record of Tide Gauge at Port Point,
- San Francisco.&nbsp; &nbsp; Showing Earthquake Waves of May 1877.</div>
- </div>
-
- <p>The sea wave of the Iquique earthquake of May 9, 1877, like many of its
- predecessors, was felt across the basin of the whole Pacific, from New
- Zealand in the south, to Japan and Kamschatka in the north. And but for
- the intervention of the Eurasian and American continents
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_170">170</span> would have
- made itself appreciable over the surface of the whole of our globe. At
- places on the South American coast, it has been stated that the height
- of the waves varied from twenty to eighty feet. At the Samoa Islands
- the heights varied from six to twelve feet. In New Zealand the sea rose
- and fell from three to twenty feet. In Australia the heights to which
- the water oscillated were similar to those observed in New Zealand. In
- Japan it rose and fell from five to ten feet. In this latter country,
- the phenomena of sea waves which follow a destructive earthquake on the
- South American coast are so well known that old residents have written
- to the local papers announcing the probability of such occurrences
- having taken place some twenty-five hours previously in South America.
- In this way news of great calamities has been anticipated, details of
- which only arrived some weeks subsequently. Just as the destructive
- earthquakes of South America have announced themselves in Japan, in
- a like manner the destructive earthquakes of Japan have announced
- themselves upon the tide gauges of California. Similarly, but not so
- frequently, disturbances shake the other oceans of the world.</p>
-
- <p>For example, the great earthquake of Lisbon propagated waves to the
- coasts of America, taking on their journey nine and a half hours.</p>
-
- <p><em>Sea waves without earthquakes.</em>—Sometimes we get great sea waves
- like abnormal tides occurring without any account of contemporaneous
- earthquakes. Although earthquakes have not been recorded, these ill
- understood phenomena are usually attributed to such movements.</p>
-
- <p>Several examples of these are given by Mallet. Thus, at 10
- <span class="smcap">a.m.</span> on March 2, 1856, the sea rose and fell for a
- considerable distance at many places on the coast of Yorkshire. At
- Whitby, the tide was described ebbing and flowing six times per hour,
- and this to such a distance<span class="pagenum" id="Page_171">171</span>
- that a vessel entering the harbour was alternately afloat and aground.</p>
-
- <p>In 1761, on July 17, a similar phenomena was observed at the same place.</p>
-
- <p>A like occurrence took place at Kilmore, in the county of Wexford, on
- September 16, 1864, when the water ebbed and flowed seven times in the
- course of two hours and a half. These tides, which appear to have taken
- about five minutes to rise and five minutes to fall, were seen by an
- observer approaching from the west as six distinct ridges of water. The
- general character of the phenomena appears to have been very similar to
- that which was produced at the same place by the Lisbon earthquake of
- 1755; and the opinion of those who saw and wrote about their occurrence
- was that it was due to an earthquake disturbance. Such phenomena are
- not uncommon on the Wexford coast, where they are popularly known as
- ‘death waves,’ probably in consequence of the lives which have been
- lost by these sudden inundations.</p>
-
- <p>They have also been observed in other parts of Ireland, the north-east
- coast of England, and in many parts of the globe. They will be again
- referred to under the head of earth pulsations.</p>
-
- <p><em>Cause of sea waves.</em>—Mallet, who in his report to the British
- Association in 1858, writes upon this last-mentioned occurrence at
- considerable length, whilst admitting that many may have originated
- from earthquakes, he thinks it scarcely probable that an earthquake
- blow, sufficiently powerful to have produced waves like those observed
- at Kilmore, should not have been felt generally throughout the south of
- Ireland. He, therefore, suggests that sometimes waves like the above
- might be produced by an underwater slippage of the material forming
- the face of a submarine bank, the slope of which by degradation and
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_172">172</span>
- deposition, produced by currents, had reached an angle beyond the
- limits of repose of the material of which it was formed. Mallet does
- not insist upon the existence of these submarine landslips, but only
- suggests their existence as a means of explaining certain abnormal sea
- waves which do not appear to have been accompanied by earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>In the generality of cases sea waves are accompanied by earthquakes,
- but it may often happen that the connection between the two is
- difficult to clearly establish. One simple explanation for the origin
- of waves occurring with earthquakes, is, that in consequence of the
- earthquake a large volume of water suddenly finds its way into cavities
- which have been opened, the disturbance produced by the inrush giving
- rise to waves.</p>
-
- <p>A second explanation is, that the land along a shore is caused by an
- earthquake to oscillate upwards, the water running off to regain its
- level. A supposition like this is negatived by the fact that these
- disturbances are felt far away from the chief disturbance, on small
- islands. Also, it may be added, that the whole disturbance appears to
- approach the land from the sea, and not in the opposite direction.
- Thus, in the earthquake of Oahu (February 18, 1871), it was remarked
- that the shock was first felt by the ships farthest from the land.<a id="FNanchor_78" href="#Footnote_78" class="fnanchor">[78]</a></p>
-
- <p>Another suggestion is that the waves are due to a sudden heaving up
- of the bottom of the ocean. If this lifting took place slowly, then
- the first result would be that the water situated over the centres of
- disturbance would flow away radially in all directions from above the
- area of disturbance.</p>
-
- <p>If, however, the submarine upheaval took place with great rapidity, say
- by the sudden evolution of a large
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_173">173</span>volume of steam developed by the
- entry of water into a volcanic vent, as the water was heaped above the
- disturbed area, water might run in radially towards this spot.</p>
-
- <p>Supposing a primary wave to be formed in the ocean by any such causes,
- then the falling of this will cause a second wave to be formed,
- existing as a ring round the first one. The combined action of the
- first and second wave will form a third one, and so the disturbance,
- starting from a point, will radiate in broadening circles. During the
- up and down motion of these waves, the energy which is imparted to any
- particle of water will, on account of the work which it has to do in
- displacing its neighbours, by frictional resistance, gradually grow
- less and less, until it finally dies away. The waves which are the
- result of this motion will also grow less and less.</p>
-
- <p>If a series of sea waves were produced by a single disturbance, we see
- that these will be of unequal magnitude. Now, for small waves, the
- velocity with which they travel depends upon the square root of their
- lengths; but with large waves, like earthquake waves, the velocity
- depends upon the square root of the depth of water, and these latter
- travel more quickly than the former.</p>
-
- <p>If, therefore, we have a series of disturbances of unequal magnitude
- producing sea waves, which, from the series of shocks which have
- been felt upon shores subsequently invaded by waves, seems in all
- probability often to have been the case, it is not unlikely that the
- waves of an early disturbance may be overtaken and interfered with by a
- series which followed.</p>
-
- <p>These considerations help us to understand the appearance of the
- records on our tide gauges, and also the phenomena observed by those
- who have recorded tidal waves as they swept inwards upon the land.
- For instance, we understand the reason why sea waves, as observed at
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_174">174</span>
- places at different distances from the origin of a disturbance, should
- be of different heights. We also see an explanation for the fact that
- small waves should sometimes appear to be interpolated between large
- ones, and that these should occur at varying intervals.</p>
-
- <p>The fact that whenever a wave is produced, a certain quantity of water
- must be drawn from the level which surrounds it, in order that it
- should be formed, explains the phenomena that the sea is often observed
- first to draw back. Out in the open ocean it is drawn from the hollow
- between two waves. As has been pointed out by Darwin, it is like the
- drawing of the water from the shore of a river by a passing steamer.</p>
-
- <p>The difference in the height of waves, as observed at places lying
- close to each other, is probably due to the configuration of the coast,
- the interference of outlying islands, reefs, &amp;c.—causes which would
- produce similar effects in the height of tide.</p>
-
- <p>As a wave approaches shallow water it gradually increases in height,
- its front slope becomes steep, and its rear slope gentle, until finally
- it topples over and breaks. This increasing in height of waves is
- no doubt connected with the destruction of Talcahuano and Callao,
- which are situated at the head of shallow bays. Valparaiso, which is
- on the edge of deep water, has never been overwhelmed.<a id="FNanchor_79" href="#Footnote_79" class="fnanchor">[79]</a> Another
- case tending to produce anomalies in the character of waves would be
- their reflection and mutual interference, the reflections due to the
- configuration of the ocean bed and coast lines.</p>
-
- <p>The complete phenomena which may accompany a violent submarine
- disturbance are as follows:—</p>
-
- <p>By the initial impulse of explosion or lifting of the ground, a ‘great
- sea wave’ is generated, which travels
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_175">175</span>shorewards with a velocity
- dependent upon its size and the depth of the ocean. At the same
- instant, a ‘sound wave’ may be produced in the air, which travels at a
- quicker rate than the ‘great sea wave.’ A third wave which is produced,
- is an ‘earth wave,’ which will reach the shore with a velocity
- dependent on the intensity of the impulse and the elasticity of the
- rocks through which it is propagated. This latter, which travels the
- fastest, may carry on its back a small ‘forced sea wave.’ On reaching
- the shore and passing inland, this ‘earth wave’ will cause a slight
- recession of the water as the ‘forced sea wave’ slips from its back.</p>
-
- <p>As these ‘forced sea waves’ travel they will give blows to ships
- beneath which they may pass, being transmitted from the bottom of the
- ocean to the bottom of the ships like sound waves in water. At the
- time of small earthquakes, produced, for example, by the explosion of
- small quantities of water entering volcanic fissures, or by the sudden
- condensation of steam from such a fissure entering the ocean, aqueous
- sound waves are produced, which cause the rattling and vibrating jars
- so often noticed on board ships.</p>
-
- <p><em>Phenomena difficult of explanation.</em>—Although we can in this way
- explain the origin and phenomena of sea waves, we must remember, as
- Kluge has pointed out, that it is not the simple backward and forward
- movement of the ground which produces sea waves, and that the majority
- of earthquakes which have occurred in volcanic coasts have been
- unaccompanied by such phenomena. Out of 15,000 earthquakes observed on
- coast lines, only 124 were accompanied by sea waves.<a id="FNanchor_80" href="#Footnote_80" class="fnanchor">[80]</a> Out of 1,098
- earthquakes catalogued by Perrey for the west coast of South America,
- only nineteen are said to have been accompanied
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_176">176</span>by movements in the
- waters. According to the ‘Geographical Magazine’ (August 1877, p. 207),
- it would seem that out of seventy-one severe earthquakes which have
- occurred since the year 1500 upon the South American coast many have
- been accompanied by sea waves. Darwin also remarks, when speaking of
- South America, that almost every large earthquake has been accompanied
- by considerable agitation in the neighbouring sea.<a id="FNanchor_81" href="#Footnote_81" class="fnanchor">[81]</a></p>
-
- <p>On April 2, 1851, when many towns in Chili were destroyed, the sea was
- not disturbed. At the time of the great earthquake of New Zealand (June
- 23, 1855), although all the shocks came from the sea, yet there was no
- flood. The small shock of February 14, however, was accompanied by a
- motion in the sea.</p>
-
- <p>To these examples, which have been chiefly drawn from the writings of
- Fuchs, must be added the fact that the greater number of disturbances
- which are felt in the north-eastern part of Japan, although they
- emanate from beneath the sea, do not produce any visible sea waves.
- They are, however, sufficient to cause a vibratory motion on board
- ships situated near their origin.</p>
-
- <p>Another point referred to by Fuchs, as difficult of explanation,
- is, that the water, when it draws back, often does so with extreme
- slowness, and farther, in some instances, it has not returned to its
- original level. That the sea might be drawn back for a period of
- fifteen or thirty minutes is intelligible, when we consider the great
- length of the waves which are formed. Cases where it has retired for
- several hours or days, and when its original level is altered, appear
- only to be explicable on the assumption of more or less permanent
- changes in the levels of the ground. For example, in the earthquake
- of 1855 which shook New Zealand, the whole southern portion of the
- northern island was raised several feet.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_177">177</span></p>
-
- <p>These sudden alterations in the levels of coast lines have already
- been referred to.</p>
-
- <p>Other points which are difficult to understand are the occurrence
- of disturbances in the sea at the time of feeble earthquakes, and
- with earthquakes occurring in distant places. As examples of such
- occurrences, Fuchs quotes the following: ‘On May 16, 1850, at 4.28
- <span class="smcap">a.m.</span>, an earthquake took place in Pesth, and at 7.30 a
- motion was observed in the sea at Livorno. Again, at the time of the
- earthquake of December 19, 1850, which shook Heliopolis, a flood
- suddenly came in upon Cherbourg.’ May not these phenomena be the result
- of an earth pulsation, which produced an earthquake at one point, and a
- sea wave at another?</p>
-
- <p>Equally difficult to understand are the observations when the
- disturbance in the sea has occurred several hours after an earthquake;
- as, for instance, at Batavia, in 1852, when there was an interval of
- two hours; and to this must be added the observations where the motion
- of the sea has preceded that of the earthquake—as, for instance, in
- 1852, at Smyrna. Whilst recognising the fact that it is possible to
- suggest explanations for many of these anomalies, we must also bear
- in mind that they are, generally speaking, exceptional, and, in some
- instances, may possibly be due to errors in observations.</p>
-
- <p><em>Velocity of propagation of sea waves, and depth of the ocean.</em>—It
- has long been known to physical science that the velocity with which
- a given wave is propagated along a trough of uniform depth, holds a
- relation to the depth of the trough.</p>
-
- <p>If <i>v</i> is the velocity of the wave, and <i>h</i> the depth of the trough,
- this relation may be expressed as follows:—</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- <i>h</i> = <span class="frac"><sup><i>v</i><sup>2</sup></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>g</i></sub></span>
- or <i>h</i> = <span class="x200b">(</span><span class="frac"><sup><i>v</i></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>k</i></sub></span><span class="x200b">)</span><sup>2</sup>
- </div>
-
- <p class="center">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_178">178</span>
- Where <i>g</i> = 32·19 and <i>k</i> = 5·671.
- </p>
-
- <p>It will be observed that these two formulæ (the first of which is
- known as Russell’s formula, and the second as Airy’s) are practically
- identical.</p>
-
- <p>The apparent difference is in the average value assigned to the
- constant.</p>
-
- <p>For large waves such as we have to deal with, it would be necessary,
- if we were desirous of great accuracy, to increase the value of <i>h</i>
- by some small fraction of itself. We might also make allowance for
- the different values of <i>g</i>, according to our position on the earth’s
- surface. With these formulæ at our disposal it is an easy matter, after
- having determined the velocity with which a wave was propagated, to
- determine the average depth of the area over which it was transmitted.</p>
-
- <p>In making certain earthquake investigations the reverse problem is
- sometimes useful—namely, determining the velocity with which a sea wave
- has advanced upon a shown line, from a knowledge of the depth of the
- water in which it has been propagated.</p>
-
- <p>Calculations of the average depths of the Pacific, dependent on the
- velocity with which earthquake waves have been propagated, have been
- made by many investigators.</p>
-
- <p>In most cases, however, in consequence of having assumed the wave to
- have originated on a coast line, when the evidence clearly showed it
- to have originated some distance out at sea, the calculations which
- have been made are open to criticism. The average depths which I
- obtained for various lines across the Pacific appear to be somewhat
- less than the average depth as given by actual soundings. We must,
- however, remember that the common error in actual soundings is that
- they are usually too great, it being difficult in deep-sea sounding
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_179">179</span>
- to determine when the lead actually reaches the bottom. Until oceans
- have been more thoroughly surveyed with the improved forms of sounding
- apparatus, we shall not be able to verify the truth of the results
- which have been given to us by earthquake waves.</p>
-
- <h3><span class="smcap">Examples of Calculations on Sea Waves.</span></h3>
-
- <p>1. <em>The wave of 1854.</em>—This wave originated near Japan, and it was
- recorded on tide gauges at San Francisco, San Diego, and Astoria.</p>
-
- <p>On December 23, at 9.15. <span class="smcap">a.m.</span>, a strong shock was felt at
- Simoda in Japan, which, at 10 o’clock, was followed by a large wave
- thirty feet in height. The rising and falling of the water continued
- until noon. Half an hour after, the movement became more violent than
- before. At 2.15 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> this agitation decreased, and at 3
- <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> it was comparatively slow. Altogether there were five
- large waves.</p>
-
- <p>On December 23 and 25, unusual waves were recorded upon the
- self-registering tide gauges at San Francisco, San Diego, and Astoria.</p>
-
- <p>At San Francisco three sets of waves were observed. The average time of
- oscillation of one of the first set was thirty-five minutes, whilst one
- of the second and third sets was almost thirty-one minutes.</p>
-
- <p>At San Diego three series of waves were also shown, but with average
- times of oscillation of from four to two minutes shorter than the waves
- at San Francisco.</p>
-
- <p>The San Francisco waves appear to indicate a recurrence of the same
- phenomena.</p>
-
- <p>The record at San Diego shows what was probably the effect of a
- series of impulses, the heights increasing to the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_180">180</span> third wave, then
- diminishing, then once more renewed, after which it died away.</p>
-
- <p>The result of calculations based on these data were:—</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Simoda sea waves">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="ball">Distance<br />geographical<br />miles</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">Time of<br />transmission</th>
- <th class="ball">Velocity in<br />feet per sec.</th>
- <th class="ball">Depth of ocean<br />in fathoms</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <th class="bl">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="bl">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="bl">h.</th>
- <th class="br">m.</th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Simoda to San Diego</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">4917</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">12</td>
- <td class="tdc br">13</td>
- <td class="tdc br">545</td>
- <td class="tdc br">2100</td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl bl">Simoda to San Francisco</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">4527</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">12</td>
- <td class="tdc br">39</td>
- <td class="tdc br">528</td>
- <td class="tdc br">2500 or 2230</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>The difference for the depths in the San Francisco path depends whether
- the length of the waves is reckoned at 210 or 217 miles. The length of
- the waves on the San Diego path were 186 or 192 miles.<a id="FNanchor_82" href="#Footnote_82" class="fnanchor">[82]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>The wave of 1868.</em>—On August 11, 1868, a sea wave ruined many cities
- on the South American coast, and 25,000 lives were lost. This wave,
- like all the others, travelled the length and breadth of the Pacific.</p>
-
- <p>In Japan, at Hakodate, it was observed by Captain T. Blakiston, R.A.,
- who very kindly gave me the following account:</p>
-
- <p>On August 15, at 10.30 <span class="smcap">a.m.</span>, a series of bores or tidal waves
- commenced, and lasted until 3 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> In ten minutes there was
- a difference in the sea level of ten feet, the water rising above
- high water and falling below low water mark with great rapidity. The
- ordinary tide is only two and a half to three feet. The disturbance
- producing these waves originated between Iquique and Arica, in about
- lat. 18.28 S. at about 5 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> on August 13. In Greenwich time
- this would be about 13h. 9m. 40s. August 13. The arrival of the wave
- at Hakodate in Greenwich time would be about 14h. 7m. 6s. August 14:
- that is to say, the wave took about 24h. 57m. to travel about 8,700
- miles, which <span class="pagenum" id="Page_181">181</span>
- gives us an average rate of about 511 feet per second.
- These waves were felt all over the Pacific. At the Chatham Islands they
- rushed in with such violence that whole settlements were destroyed. At
- the Sandwich Islands the sea oscillated at intervals of ten minutes for
- three days.</p>
-
- <p>Comparing this wave with the one of 1877 we see that one reached
- Hakodate with a velocity of 511 feet per second, whilst the other
- travelled the same distance at 512 feet per second.</p>
-
- <p>An account of this earthquake wave has been given by F. von Hochstetter
- (‘Über das Erdbeben in Peru am 13. August 1868 und die dadurch
- veranlassten Fluthwellen im Pacifischen Ocean,’ Sitzungsberichte
- der Kaiserl. Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 58. Bd., 2. Abth.
- 1868). From an epitome of this paper given in ‘Petermann’s Geograph.
- Mittheil.’ 1869, p. 222, I have drawn up the following table of the
- more important results obtained by F. von Hochstetter.</p>
-
- <p>The wave is assumed to have originated near Arica.</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Hochstetter sea waves">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="ball">Distance<br />sea miles<br />from Arica</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">Time<br />taken by wave</th>
- <th class="ball">Velocity<br />in feet per<br />second</th>
- <th class="ball">Depth of<br />ocean in feet</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <th class="bl">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="bl">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="tdr bl"><div>h.</div></th>
- <th class="tdr br"><div>m.</div></th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="tdr br">&nbsp;</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Valdivia</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">1,420</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">479</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>7,140</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Chatham Islands</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,520</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>19</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">608</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>11,472</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Lyttleton</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">6,120</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>19</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">533</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8,838</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Newcastle</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">7,380</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>22</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>28</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">538</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9,006</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Apia (Samoa)</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,760</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>16</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">604</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>11,346</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Rapa</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">4,057</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">611</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>11,598</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Hilo</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,400</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>25</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">555</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9,568</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl bl">Honolulu</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,580</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>37</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">746</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>17,292</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>Calculations on the same disturbance are also given by J. E.
- Hilgard.<a id="FNanchor_83" href="#Footnote_83" class="fnanchor">[83]</a></p>
-
- <p>Assuming the origin of the wave to have been at Arica, his results are
- as follows:</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_182">182</span></p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Hilgard sea waves">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="ball">Distance<br />from Africa</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">Time of<br />transmission</th>
- <th class="ball">Nautical miles<br />per hour</th>
- <th class="ball">Mean depth<br />of ocean</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <th class="bl">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="bl">miles</th>
- <th class="tdr bl"><div>h.</div></th>
- <th class="tdr br"><div>m.</div></th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">feet</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">San Diego</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">4,030</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>55</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">369</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>12,100</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Fort Point</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">4,480</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>56</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">348</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10,800</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Astoria</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,000</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>51</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">265</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>6,200</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Kodiak</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">6,200</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>22</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>00</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">282</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>7,000</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Rapa</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">4,057</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>54</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">372</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>12,200</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Chatham Islands</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,520</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>01</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">368</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>12,100</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Hawaii</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,460</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">385</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>13,200</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Honolulu</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,580</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">454</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>18,500</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Samoa</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,760</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>38</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">368</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>12,100</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Lyttelton</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">6,120</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>19</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>01</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">322</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9,200</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Newcastle</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">9,380</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>22</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">332</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9,800</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl bl">Sydney</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">7,440</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>23</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>41</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">314</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8,800</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p><em>The wave of 1877.</em>—Two sets of calculations have been made upon the
- wave of 1877 by Dr. E. Geinitz of Rostock.<a id="FNanchor_84" href="#Footnote_84" class="fnanchor">[84]</a></p>
-
- <p>The following table is taken from Dr. Geinitz’s second paper, in which
- there are several modifications of his first results. The origin of the
- disturbance is assumed to have been near Iquique.</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Geinitz sea waves">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">Observation stations</th>
- <th class="ball">Distance<br />from Iquique<br />geol. miles</th>
- <th colspan="3" class="ball">Arrival of wave</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">Time taken<br />by wave</th>
- <th class="ball">Velocity in<br />feet per<br />second</th>
- <th class="ball">Mean depth<br />of ocean<br />in fathoms</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <th class="bl">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="bl">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="tdr bl"><div>h.</div></th>
- <th class="tdr"><div>m.</div></th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="tdr"><div>h.</div></th>
- <th class="tdr br"><div>m.</div></th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Taiohāc (Marquesa Islands)</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">4,086</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>40</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br"><span class="smcap">a.m.</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">563·8</td>
- <td class="tdc br">1,647</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Apia (Samoa)</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,740</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">610·4</td>
- <td class="tdc br">1,930</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Hilo (Sandwich Islands)</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,526</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr "><div>24</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">667·9</td>
- <td class="tdc br">2,310</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Kahuliu&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,628</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">675·2</td>
- <td class="tdc br">2,361</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Honolulu&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,712</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>50</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>25</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">669·7</td>
- <td class="tdc br">2,319</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Wellington (New Zealand)</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,657</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>40</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br"><span class="smcap">p.m.</span></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">524·2</td>
- <td class="tdc br">1,430</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Lyttelton&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">5,641</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>48</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>23</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">519·8</td>
- <td class="tdc br">1,400</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Newcastle (Australia)</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">6,800</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>32</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">633·0</td>
- <td class="tdc br">2,075</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Sydney&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">6,782</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>35</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">631·4</td>
- <td class="tdc br">2,065</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Kamieshi (Japan)</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">8,790</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>20</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>22</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>55</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">649·0</td>
- <td class="tdc br">2,182</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Hakodate&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">8,760</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>25</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>25</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">592·5</td>
- <td class="tdc br">1,818</td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl bl">Kadsusa&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdc bl">8,939</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>50</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>25</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">604·9</td>
- <td class="tdc br">1,895</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_183">183</span></p>
-
- <p>The mean depths represent a mean of two sets of calculations, one made
- with the aid of Airy’s formula, and the other by Scott-Russell’s
- formula. The result of my own investigation about this disturbance, the
- origin of which, by several methods of calculation, is shown to have
- been beneath the ocean, near 71° 5′ west long., and 21° 22′ south lat.,
- are given on next page.</p>
-
- <p>Dr. Geinitz considers that his calculated depths of the ocean and those
- obtained by actual soundings are in accordance, a result which is
- diametrically opposed to that which I have obtained.</p>
-
- <p>This difference between my calculations and those of Dr. Geinitz,
- Hochstetter, and others, chiefly rests on the origin we have assigned
- for the sea waves. Dr. Geinitz, for instance, although he says that
- the origin of the 1877 earthquake was not on the continent but to
- the west in the ocean, bases all his calculations on the assumption
- that the <em>centrum</em> was at or near to Iquique, and the time at which
- that city was disturbed was the time at which the waves commenced to
- spread across the ocean. This time is 8.25 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> At this time,
- however, it appears that the waves must have been more than double
- the distance between the true origin and Iquique, from Iquique on
- their way towards the opposite side of the Pacific. Introducing this
- element into the various calculations which have been made respecting
- the depth of the Pacific Ocean as derived from observations on
- earthquake waves—which element, insomuch as the waves appear to have
- come in to inundate the land some time after the shock, needs to be
- introduced—we reduce the velocity of transit of the earthquake wave
- and, consequently, the resultant depths of the ocean.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_184">184</span></p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Geinitz sea waves 2">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th colspan="3" class="ball">Longitude</th>
- <th colspan="3" class="ball">Arrival of<br />wave in<br />Greenwich<br /> mean time</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">Time taken<br />by wave</th>
- <th class="ball">Distance<br />from the<br />origin<br />in miles<br />(calculated<br />in great<br />circles)</th>
- <th class="ball">Velocity<br />in feet<br />per second</th>
- <th class="ball">Depth of<br />the ocean<br />in feet</th>
- <th class="ball">Height<br />of waves</th>
- <th class="ball">Interval<br />between waves<br />in minutes</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <th class="bl">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="tdr bl"><div>°</div></th>
- <th class="tdr"><div>′</div></th>
- <th class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></th>
- <th class="tdr bl"><div>day</div></th>
- <th class="tdr"><div>h.</div></th>
- <th class="tdr br"><div>m.</div></th>
- <th class="tdr bl"><div>h.</div></th>
- <th class="tdr br"><div>m.</div></th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Origin of wave</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>71</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>W.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>59</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">San Francisco</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>122</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>32</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>28</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>29</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>4,578</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">498</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>7,721</div></td>
- <td class="br">9 in.</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Callao</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>77</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>17</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>658</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">231</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,657</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Iquique</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>70</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>14½</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>21</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>22</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>87</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">348</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3,770</div></td>
- <td class="br">20 ft.</td>
- <td class="br">22</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Cobija</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>70</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>21</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>19</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>20</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>80</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">352</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3,857</div></td>
- <td class="br">30 „</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Mejillones</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>70</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>35</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>28</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>108</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">339</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3,587</div></td>
- <td class="br">35 „</td>
- <td class="br">15 or 45</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Chanaral</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>71</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>34</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>26</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>455</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">272</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2,309</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">10</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Coquimbo</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>71</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>24</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>16</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>508</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">328</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3,363</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">30</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Valparaiso</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>71</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>38</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>16</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>16</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>17</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>695</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">310</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3,000</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Concepcion</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>73</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>16</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>52</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>53</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>928</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">350</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3,824</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">12 to 15</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Honolulu</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>157</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>55</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>52</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>53</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5,694</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">561</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9,807</div></td>
- <td class="br">34 to 54 ft.</td>
- <td class="br">25</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Hilo</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>155</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5,506</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">563</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10,217</div></td>
- <td class="br">30 or 8 „</td>
- <td class="tdr0 pl0 br">
- <table summary="Geinitz sub-table">
- <tr>
- <td class="x200 pl0">{</td>
- <td class="tdr0 pr0 pl0"><div>3 or 15<br />18 or 27</div>
- </td>
- </tr>
- </table>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Kahuliu</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>156</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>43</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5,611</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">579</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10,437</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Samoa</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>171</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>41</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>W.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>57</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>58</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5,773</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">566</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9,972</div></td>
- <td class="br">12 ft.</td>
- <td class="br">10</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Taurauga</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>176</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>E.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>19</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>16</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5,615</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">427</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5,697</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Wellington</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>174</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>22</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>23</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5,574</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">445</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>6,168</div></td>
- <td class="br">11 „</td>
- <td class="br">10</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Akaroa</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>172</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>59</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>28</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>29</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5,542</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">440</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>6,031</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Lyttelton</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>172</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>45</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>29</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5,558</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">441</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>6,055</div></td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Kameishi</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>140</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>50</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>37</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>23</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>38</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8,844</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">549</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9,378</div></td>
- <td class="br">6 „</td>
- <td class="br">15</td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl bl">Hakodate</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>140</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>50</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>25</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8,778</div></td>
- <td class="tdc br">512</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8,169</div></td>
- <td class="br">7 „</td>
- <td class="br">20</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_185">185</span></p>
-
- <p>In Dr. Geinitz’s paper there are also some slight differences in the
- times at which the earthquake phenomena were observed at various localities. These, however, are but
- of minor importance. At the end of the paper by Dr. Geinitz two
- interesting tide gauge records are introduced, one from Sydney and the
- other from Newcastle. These appear to show a marked difference in the
- periods of the sea waves at these two places.<a id="FNanchor_85" href="#Footnote_85" class="fnanchor">[85]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Comparison of velocities of wave-transit which have been actually
- observed, with velocities which ought to exist from what we know of
- the depth of the Pacific by actual soundings.</em>—From a chart given in
- ‘Petermann’s Geograph. Mittheilungen,’ Band xxiii. p. 164, 1877, it is
- possible to draw approximate sections on lines in various directions
- across the bed of the Pacific.</p>
-
- <p>From the origin of the shock to Japan (Kameishi) the line would be as
- follows:—</p>
-
- <table summary="Wave travel depth to Japan">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>about 7,441</div></td>
- <td>miles</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div> 15,000</div></td>
- <td>feet deep</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1,100</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>18,000</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>160</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>27,000</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>80</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>12,000</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>60</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>6,000</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>On account of the Tuscarora and Belkap Deeps this would be the most
- irregular line over which the wave had to travel.</p>
-
- <p>From the origin to New Zealand (Wellington) the line would be</p>
-
- <table summary="Wave travel depth to New Zealand">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>about 5,274</div></td>
- <td>miles</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div> 15,000</div></td>
- <td>feet deep</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>„ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 300</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>12,000</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>From the origin to Samoa the line would be</p>
-
- <table summary="Wave travel depth to Samoa">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>about 5,773</div></td>
- <td>miles</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div> 15,000</div></td>
- <td>feet deep</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>From the origin to the Sandwich Islands (Honolulu) the line would be</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_186">186</span></p>
-
- <table summary="Wave travel depth to Honolulu">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>almost 5,634</div></td>
- <td>miles</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div> 15,000</div></td>
- <td>feet deep</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdr"><div>and&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 60</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div> 12,000</div></td>
- <td class="tdc">„</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>By Scott-Russell’s rule, or, what is almost identically the same, by
- Airy’s general formula, we can calculate how long it would take such
- waves as we have been speaking about to travel over the different
- portions of each of these lines, and by adding these times together we
- obtain the time taken to travel across any one line. I have made these
- calculations, but as I get in every case answers which are too small, I
- think it unnecessary to give them.</p>
-
- <p>The actual times taken to travel the distances just referred to were,</p>
-
- <table summary="Wave travel time">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">To Japan (Kameishi)</td>
- <td class="tdl">23 hr. 38 min.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;„&nbsp; New Zealand (Wellington)</td>
- <td class="tdl">18&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp;23&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;„&nbsp; Samoa</td>
- <td class="tdl">14&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp;58&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;„&nbsp; Sandwich Islands (Honolulu)</td>
- <td class="tdl">14&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp;53&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>From San Francisco to Simoda the line is almost 3,567 miles, 3,000
- fathoms deep, 840 miles, 2,500 fathoms deep, and 120 miles 1,000
- fathoms deep. This gives an average depth of about 2,854 fathoms. Bache
- calculated the depth at 2,500 fathoms.</p>
-
- <p>If we are to consider that, because the sea wave at Simoda came in
- some time after the land shock had been felt, the origin of this
- earthquake, instead of being at Simoda, was some distance out at sea,
- this calculated depth would be reduced.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_X">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_187">187</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER X.<br />
- <span class="subhead">DETERMINATION OF EARTHQUAKE ORIGINS.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Approximate determination of an Origin—Earthquake-hunting
- in Japan—Determinations by direction of motion—Direction
- indicated by destruction of buildings—Direction determined by
- rotation—Cause of rotation—The use of time observations—Errors
- in such observations—Origin determined by the method of straight
- lines—The method of circles, the method of hyperbolas, the method
- of co-ordinates—Haughton’s method—Difference in time between
- sound, earth, and water waves—Method of Seebach.</div>
-
- <p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">One</span> of the most practical problems which can be suggested to the
- seismologist is the determination of the district or districts in any
- given country from which earthquake disturbances originate. With a
- map of a country before us, shaded with tints of different intensity
- to indicate the relative frequency of seismic disturbance in various
- districts, we at once see the localities where we might dwell with
- the least disturbance, and those we should seek if we wish to make
- observational seismology a study. Before erecting observatories for
- the systematic investigation of earthquakes in a country, it would
- be necessary for us, in some way or other, to examine the proposed
- country to find out the most suitable district. The special problem
- of determining <em>approximately</em> the origin or origins of a set of
- earthquakes would be given to us. Having made this preliminary
- investigation, the next point is, by means of observatories so
- arranged that<span class="pagenum" id="Page_188">188</span>
- they could always work in conjunction with each other,
- to determine the origins more accurately. By knowing the origin from
- which a set of shocks spring we know the general direction in which
- we may expect the most violent disturbances, and we can arrange our
- seismometers accordingly.</p>
-
- <p><em>Approximate determination of origins.</em>—In 1880 I obtained a tolerably
- fair idea of the distribution of seismic energy throughout Japan, by
- compiling the facts obtained from some hundreds of communications
- received from various parts of the country respecting the number of
- earthquakes that had been felt.</p>
-
- <p>The communications were replies to letters sent to various residents
- in the country and to a large number of public officers. By taking
- these records, in conjunction with the records made by instruments, it
- was ascertained that in Japan alone there were certainly 1,200 shocks
- felt during the year, that is to say, three or four shocks per day.
- The greater number of these shocks were felt along the eastern coast,
- commencing at Tokio, in the south, and going northwards to the end of
- the main island. These shocks were seldom felt on the west coast. It
- appeared as if the central range of mountains formed a barrier to their
- progress. Similarly, ranges of mountains to the south-west of Tokio
- prevented the shocks from travelling southwards. Proceeding in this way
- the conclusion was arrived at that the west coast, the southern part
- of Japan, and the islands of Shikoku and Kiushiu, had their own local
- earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquake-hunting.</em>—These preliminary enquiries having shown that
- the northern part of Japan was a better district for seismological
- observations than the southern half, the next step was to subject the
- northern half to a closer analysis. This analysis was commenced by
- sending<span class="pagenum" id="Page_189">189</span>
- to all the important towns, from thirty to one hundred miles
- distant from Tokio, bundles of postcards. These were entrusted to the
- local government offices with a request that each week one of these
- cards would be returned to Tokio stating the number of shocks felt.
- In this way it was quickly discovered that the majority of shakings
- emanated from the north and east, and seldom, if ever, passed a heavy
- range of mountains to the south. The barricade of postcards was then
- extended farther northwards, with the result of surrounding the origin
- of certain shocks amongst the mountains, whilst others were traced to
- the sea shore. By systematically pursuing earthquakes it was seen that
- many shocks had their origin beneath the sea—they shook all the places
- on the north-east coast, but it was seldom that they crossed through
- the mountains, forming the backbone of the island, to disturb the
- places on the west coast.</p>
-
- <p>The actual results obtained in three months by this method of working
- are shown in the accompanying map, which embraces the northern half of
- the main island of Nipon and part of Yezo. The shaded portion of the
- map indicates the mountainous districts, which are traversed by ranges
- varying in height from about 2,000 and 7,000 feet. The dotted lines
- show the boundaries of the more important groups of earthquakes which
- were recorded.</p>
-
- <p>I. is the western boundary of earthquakes, which at places to the
- eastward are usually felt somewhat severely. Some of these have been
- felt the most severely at or near Hakodadi, whilst farther south their
- effects have been weak. Occasionally the greatest effect has been near
- to Kameishi. Sometimes these earthquakes terminate along the western
- boundaries of III. or IV., not being able to pass the high range of
- mountains which separate the plain of Musashi from Kofu.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_190">190</span>
- <img src="images/i_p190.jpg" width="378" height="700" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 29.</span>—Northern Japan.&nbsp; &nbsp; Mountainous districts
- shaded with oblique lines.</div>
- </div>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_191">191</span></p>
-
- <p>II. is the boundary of a shock confined to the plain which surrounds
- Kofu. These earthquakes are evidently quite local. Many of the
- disturbances have evidently originated beneath the ocean, having
- come in upon the land in the direction of the arrows <span class="smcap">a</span> or
- <span class="smcap">b</span>.</p>
-
- <p>III. This line indicates the boundary of a group of shocks which
- are often experienced in Tokio. These may come in the directions
- <span class="smcap">d</span>, <span class="smcap">e</span>, or
- <span class="smcap">f</span>. It is probable that some of
- them originate to the eastward of Yokohama, on or near to the opposite
- peninsula.</p>
-
- <p>IV. V. and VI. The earthquakes bounded by these lines probably
- originate in the directions <span class="smcap">c</span> or
- <span class="smcap">d</span>.</p>
-
- <p>VII. The earthquakes bounded by this line probably come from the
- direction <span class="smcap">e</span>.</p>
-
- <p>VIII. This line gives us the boundary of earthquakes which may come
- from the direction <span class="smcap">b</span>.</p>
-
- <p>The above boundaries sometimes do not extend so far to the westward as
- they are shown. At other times, groups like V. and VI. extend farther
- to the south-west. These earthquake boundaries, which so clearly show
- the effects of high mountains in preventing the extension of motion,
- have been drawn up, not from single earthquakes, but from a large
- series of earthquakes which have been plotted upon blank maps, and are
- now bound together to form an atlas. To give an idea of the material
- upon which I have been working, I may state that between March 1 and
- March 10, 1882, I received records of no less than thirty-four distinct
- shocks felt in districts between Hakodate and Tokio, and for each of
- these it is quite possible to draw a map. In addition to the boundaries
- of disturbances given in the accompanying map, other boundaries might
- be drawn for shocks which were more local in their character. The
- groups which contained the greatest number of shocks are III., IV., V.,
- VI., and VII. By<span class="pagenum" id="Page_192">192</span>
- work of this description it was found that a very
- important group of earthquakes might be studied by a line of stations
- commencing at Saporo in the north, passing through Hakodate, down the
- east coast of the main island, to Tokio or Yokohama in the south. A
- further aid to the study of this group, together with the study of
- an important local group, might be effected with the help of a few
- additional stations properly distributed on the plain of Musashi, which
- surrounds Tokio. With this example before us it will be recognised that
- the choice of sites for a connected set of seismological observatories
- will often be more or less a special problem. If earthquake stations
- were to be placed in different directions around Tokio without
- preliminary investigation, it is quite possible that some of them might
- be so situated that they would seldom if ever work in conjunction with
- the remaining observatories, and therefore be of but little value.
- And this remark must equally apply to districts in other portions
- of the globe. The method is crude, and, so far as actual earthquake
- origins are concerned, it only yields results which are approximate.
- The crudeness and the want of absoluteness in the results is, however,
- more than counterbalanced by the certainty with which we are enabled
- to express ourselves with regard to such results as are obtained. Even
- when working with the best instruments we have at our command, unless
- we are employing some elaborate system, this method of working gives a
- most valuable check upon our instrumental records, and enables us to
- interpret them with greater confidence.</p>
-
- <p><em>Determination of earthquake origins from the direction of motion.</em>—If
- we assume that an earthquake is propagated from a centre as a series
- of waves, in which normal vibrations are conspicuous, and obtain at
- two localities, not in the same straight line with the origin,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_193">193</span> and
- sufficiently far separated from each other, the direction of movement
- of these normal motions, by drawing lines parallel to these directions
- through our two stations, the lines would intersect at a point above
- the required origin. If instead of two points we had three, or, better
- still, a large number, the results we should obtain ought to be
- still more certain. Unfortunately, it seems that earthquakes seldom
- originate from a given point, and, further, normal motions are not
- always (sufficiently) prominent. Sometimes, as has already been shown
- in the chapters on earthquake motion, they may be non-existent. It is
- probable, however, that difficulties of this sort are more usually
- associated with non-destructive earthquakes. Mallet regards the
- destructive effects of an earthquake as almost solely due to normal
- motions. If this be true, for destructive earthquakes, the problem is
- shorn of many of its difficulties. In cases where normal vibrations
- are not prominent, where we have only transverse vibrations, motions
- due to the interference of normal or transverse motions, or directions
- of motions due to the topographical or geological nature through which
- the disturbance has passed, the determination of the origin of an
- earthquake by observations on the direction in which the ground has
- been moving appears to be a problem which is practically without a
- solution. We will, therefore, only consider the determination of the
- origin of those earthquakes which have predominating directions in
- their movements, which directions we will consider as normal ones.
- The question which is, then, before us, is the determination of the
- direction of these normal movements. First of all we may take the
- evidence of our senses. In exceptional cases these have given results
- which closely approximate to the truth, but in the majority of cases
- such results are not to be relied upon, as the inhabitants of a town
- will, for the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_194">194</span>
- same shock, give directions corresponding to all points
- of the compass. Much, no doubt, depends upon the situation of the
- observer, and much, perhaps, upon his temperament. If he is sitting
- in a room alone, and is accustomed to making observations on an
- earthquake, on feeling the earthquake, if he concentrates his attention
- on the direction in which he is being moved, his observations may be
- of value. If, however, he is not so situated, and his attention is
- not thus concentrated, his opinions, unless the motion has been very
- decided in its character, are usually of but little worth.</p>
-
- <p><em>Direction determined from destruction of buildings.</em>—When an observer
- first sees a town that has been partially shattered by an earthquake,
- all appears to be confusion, and it is difficult to imagine that in
- such apparent chaos we are able to discover laws. If, however, we take
- a general view of this destruction and compare together similarly
- built buildings, it is possible to discover that similar and similarly
- situated structures have suffered in a similar manner. By carefully
- analysing the destruction we are enabled to infer the direction in
- which the destroying forces have acted. It was chiefly by observing the
- cracks in buildings, and the direction in which bodies were overthrown
- or projected, that Mallet determined the origin of the Neapolitan
- earthquake. From the observations given in Chapter VII. it would appear
- that, with destructive earthquakes, walls which are transverse to the
- direction of motion are most likely to be overturned, whilst, with
- small earthquakes, these walls are the least liable to be fractured.</p>
-
- <p>From a critical examination of the <em>general</em> nature of the damage
- done on the buildings of a town, earthquake observers have shown that
- the direction of a shock may often be approximately determined. The
- direction in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_195">195</span>
- which a body having a regular form like a prismatic
- gravestone or a cylindrical column is overturned sometimes gives the
- means by which we can determine the direction from which a movement
- came.</p>
-
- <p><em>The rotation of bodies.</em>—It has often been observed that almost all
- large earthquakes have caused objects like tombstones, obelisks,
- chimneys, &amp;c., to rotate.</p>
-
- <p>One of the most natural and at the same time most simple explanations
- is to suppose that during the shock there had been a twisting, or
- backward and forward screw-like motion in the ground. Amongst the
- Italians and the Mexicans earthquakes producing an effect like this are
- spoken of as ‘vorticosi.’ In the Calabrian earthquake, not only were
- bodies like obelisks twisted on their bases, but straight rows of trees
- seem to have been left in interrupted zigzags. These latter phenomena
- have been explained upon the assumption of the interference of direct
- waves and reflected waves, the consequence of which being that points
- in close proximity might be caused to move in opposite directions.
- Reflections such as these would be most likely to occur near to the
- junction of strata of different elasticity, and it may be remarked that
- it is often near such places that much twisting has been observed.</p>
-
- <p>Another way in which it is possible for twisting to have taken place
- would be by the interference of the normal and transverse waves which
- probably always exist in an earthquake shock, or by the meeting of
- the parts of the normal wave itself, one having travelled in a direct
- line from the origin, whilst the other, travelling through variable
- material, has had its direction changed.</p>
-
- <p>Mallet, however, has shown that the rotation may have been in many
- cases brought about without the supposition of any actual twisting
- motion of the earth—<span class="pagenum" id="Page_196">196</span>a
- simple backward and forward motion being quite
- sufficient. If one block of stone rests upon another, and the two are
- shaken backwards and forwards in a straight line, and if the vertical
- through the centre of gravity of the upper block does not coincide with
- the point where there is the greatest friction between the blocks,
- rotation must take place. If the vertical through the centre of gravity
- falls on one side of the centre of friction, the rotation would be in
- one direction, whilst, if on the other side, the rotation would be in
- the opposite direction.</p>
-
- <p>Although the above explanation is simple, and also in many cases
- probably true, it hardly appears sufficient to account for all the
- phenomena which have been observed.</p>
-
- <p>Thus, for instance, if the stones in the Yokohama cemetery, at the time
- of the earthquake of 1880, had been twisted in consequence of the cause
- suggested by Mallet, we should most certainly have found that some
- stones had turned in one direction whilst others had been twisted in
- another. By a careful examination of the rotated stones, I found that
- every stone—the stones being in parallel lines—had <em>revolved in the
- same direction</em>, namely in a direction opposite to that of the hands of
- a watch.</p>
-
- <p>As it would seem highly improbable that the centre of greatest friction
- in all these stones of different sizes and shapes should have been at
- the same side of their centres of gravity, an effect like this could
- only be explained by the conjoint action of two successive shocks, the
- direction of one being transverse to the other.</p>
-
- <p>Although fully recognising the sufficiency of two transverse shocks
- to produce the effects which have been observed in Yokohama, I will
- offer what appears to me to be the true explanation of this phenomenon:
- it was first suggested by my colleague, Mr. Gray, and appears to be
- simpler than any with which I am acquainted.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_197">197</span></p>
-
- <div class="figright">
- <img src="images/i_p197.jpg" width="180" height="228" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 30.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>If any columnar-like object, for example a prism which the basal
- section is represented by <span class="smcap">a b c d</span> (see fig. 30), receives a
- shock at right angles to <span class="smcap">b c</span>, there will be a tendency for
- the inertia of the body to cause it to overturn on the edge <span class="smcap">b c</span>.
- If the shock were at right angles to <span class="smcap">d c</span>, the tendency
- would be to overturn on the edge <span class="smcap">d c</span>. If the shock were in
- the direction of the diagonal <span class="smcap">c a</span>, the tendency would be to
- overturn on the point <span class="smcap">c</span>. Let us, however, now suppose the
- impulse to be in some direction like <span class="smcap">e g</span>, where <span class="smcap">g</span>
- is the centre of gravity of the body. For simplicity we may imagine
- the overturning effect to be an impulse given through <span class="smcap">g</span> in an
- opposite direction—that is, in the direction <span class="smcap">g e</span>. This force
- will tend to tip or make the body bear heavily on <span class="smcap">c</span>, and at
- the same time to whirl round <span class="smcap">c</span> as an axis, the direction of
- turn being in the direction of the hands of a watch. If, however, the
- direction of impulse had been <span class="smcap">e′ g</span>, then, although the turning
- would still have been round <span class="smcap">c</span>, the direction would have been
- <em>opposite</em> to that of the hands of a watch.</p>
-
- <p>To put these statements in another form, imagine <span class="smcap">g e′</span> to
- be resolved into two components, one of them along <span class="smcap">g c</span> and
- the other at right angles, <span class="smcap">g f</span>. Here the component of the
- direction <span class="smcap">g c</span> tends to make the body tip on <span class="smcap">c</span>, whilst
- the other component along <span class="smcap">g f</span> causes revolution. Similarly
- <span class="smcap">g e</span> may be resolved into its two components <span class="smcap">g c</span> and
- <span class="smcap">g f′</span>, the latter being the one tending to cause revolution.</p>
-
- <p>From this we see that if a body has a rectangular section, so long as
- it is acted upon by a shock which is parallel to its sides or to its
- diagonals, there ought not to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_198">198</span>
- be any revolution. If we divide our
- section <span class="smcap">a b c d</span> up into eight divisions by lines through these
- directions, we shall see that any shock the direction of which passes
- through any of the octants which are shaded will cause a <em>positive</em>
- revolution in the body—that is to say, a revolution corresponding in
- its direction to that of the movements of the hands of a watch; whilst
- if its direction passes through any of the remaining octants the
- revolution will be <em>negative</em>, or opposite to that of the hands of a
- watch. From the direction in which any given stone has turned, we can
- therefore give two sets of limits between one of which the shock must
- have come.</p>
-
- <p>Further, it will be observed that the tendency of the turning is to
- bring a stone, like the one we are discussing, broadside on to the
- shock; therefore, if a stone with a rectangular cross section has
- turned sufficiently, the direction of a shock will be parallel to one
- of its faces, but if it has not turned sufficiently it will be more
- nearly parallel to its faces in their new position than it was to its
- faces when in their original position.</p>
-
- <p>If a stone receives a shock nearly parallel with its diagonal, on
- account of its instability it may turn either positively or negatively
- according as the friction on its base or some irregularity of surface
- bearing most influence. Similarly, if a stone receives a shock parallel
- to one of its faces, the twisting may be either positive or negative,
- but the probability is that it would only turn slightly; whereas in the
- former case, where the shock was nearly parallel to a diagonal, the
- turning would probably be great.</p>
-
- <p><em>Determination of direction from instruments.</em>—When speaking about
- earthquakes it was shown, as the result of many observations, that
- the same earthquake in the space of a few seconds, although it may
- sometimes have only one direction of motion, very often has many
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_199">199</span>
- directions of motion. In certain cases, therefore, our records, if we
- assume the most permanent motions to be normal ones, give definite and
- valuable results. In other cases it is necessary to carefully analyse
- the records, comparing those taken at one station with those taken at
- another.</p>
-
- <p>One remarkable fact which has been pointed out in reference to
- artificial earthquakes produced by exploding charges of gunpowder or
- dynamite, and also with regard to certain earthquakes, is that the
- greatest motion of the ground is <em>inwards</em>, towards the point from
- which the disturbance originated. Should this prove the rule, it gives
- a means of determining, not only the direction of earthquake, but the
- side from which it came.</p>
-
- <p><em>Determination of earthquake origins by time observations.</em>—The times
- at which an earthquake was felt at a number of stations are among the
- most important observations which can be made for the determination of
- an earthquake origin. The methods of making time observations, and the
- difficulties which have to be overcome, have already been described.
- When determining the direction from which a shock has originated, or
- determining the origin of the shock by means of time observations,
- it has been usual to assume that the velocity of propagation of the
- shock has been uniform from the origin. The errors involved in this
- assumption appear to as follows:—</p>
-
- <p>1. We know from observations on artificial earthquakes that the
- velocity of propagation is greater between stations near to the origin
- of the shock than it is between more remote stations; and also the
- velocity of propagation varies with the initial force which produced
- the disturbance. If our points of observation are sufficiently close
- together as compared with their distance from the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_200">200</span> origin of the
- disturbance, it is probable that errors of this description are small
- and will not make material differences in the general results.</p>
-
- <p>2. We have reasons for believing that the transit velocity of an
- earthquake is dependent on the nature of the rocks through which it
- is propagated. Errors which arise from causes of this description
- will, however, be practically eliminated if our observation points are
- situated on an area sufficiently large, so that the distribution of the
- causes tending to alter the velocity of a shock balance each other. It
- must be remarked, that causes of this description may also produce an
- alteration in the direction of our shock.</p>
-
- <p>Other errors which may sometimes enter into our results, when
- determining the origin of shocks by means of observations on
- velocities, are the assumptions that the disturbance has travelled
- along the surface from the <em>epicentrum</em> and not in a direct line from
- the <em>centrum</em>. Again, it is assumed that the origin is a point, whereas
- it may possibly be a cavity or a fissure. Lastly, if we desire extreme
- accuracy, we must make due allowance for the sphericity of the earth
- and the differences of elevation of the observing stations.</p>
-
- <p>I. <em>The method of straight lines.</em>—Given a number of pairs of points
- <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>0</sub>, <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub>, <span class="smcap">b</span><sub>0</sub>, <span class="smcap">b</span><sub>1</sub>,
- <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>0</sub>, <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>1</sub>, &amp;c., at each of which the shock was
- felt simultaneously, to determine the origin.</p>
-
- <p>Theoretically if we bisect the line which joins <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>0</sub>
- and <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub> by a line at right angles to <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>0</sub>,
- <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub>, and similarly bisect the lines <span class="smcap">b</span><sub>0</sub>,
- <span class="smcap">b</span><sub>1</sub>, <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>0</sub>, <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>1</sub>, all these bisecting
- lines <i>a</i><sub>0</sub>, <i>a</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>b</i><sub>0</sub>, <i>b</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>c</i><sub>0</sub>, <i>c</i><sub>1</sub>, &amp;c., ought
- to intersect in a point, which point will be the <em>epicentrum</em> or the
- point above the origin.</p>
-
- <p>This method will fail, first, if <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>0</sub>, <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub>,
- <span class="smcap">b</span><sub>0</sub>, <span class="smcap">b</span><sub>0</sub>, <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>0</sub>, <span class="smcap">c</span><sub>1</sub> form a
- continuous straight line, or if they form a series of parallel lines.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_201">201</span></p>
-
- <p>Hopkins gives a method based on a principle similar to the one which
- is here employed—namely, given that a shock arrives simultaneously
- at <em>three</em> points to determine, the centre. In this case, the
- relative positions of the three points, where the time of arrival was
- simultaneous, must be accurately known, and these three points must
- not lie in a straight line, or the method will fail. For practical
- application the problem must be restricted to the case of three points
- which do not lie nearly in the same straight line.</p>
-
- <p>II. <em>The method of circles.</em>—Given the times <i>t</i><sub>0</sub>, <i>t</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>t</i><sub>2</sub>,
- &amp;c., at which a shock arrived at a number of places <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>0</sub>,
- <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub>, <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>2</sub>, &amp;c., to determine the position from
- which the shock originated.</p>
-
- <p>Suppose <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>0</sub> to be the place which the shock reached first,
- and that it reached <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub>, <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>2</sub>, <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>3</sub>,
- &amp;c., successively afterwards.</p>
-
- <p>
- Let&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <i>t</i><sub>1</sub> - <i>t</i><sub>0</sub> = <i>a</i><br />
- &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<i>t</i><sub>2</sub> - <i>t</i><sub>0</sub> = <i>b</i><br />
- &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<i>t</i><sub>3</sub> - <i>t</i><sub>0</sub> = <i>c</i>, &amp;c.
- </p>
-
- <p>With <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub>, <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>2</sub>, <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>3</sub>, &amp;c. as centres,
- describe circles with radii proportional to the known qualities <i>a</i>,
- <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>, &amp;c., and also a circle which passes through <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>0</sub>
- and touches these circles. The centre of the last circle will be the
- <em>epicentrum</em>. The radii proportional to <i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>, &amp;c. may be
- represented by the quantities <i>ax</i>, <i>bx</i>, <i>cx</i>, &amp;c., where <i>x</i> is the
- velocity of propagation of the shock.</p>
-
- <p>It will be observed that the times at which the shock arrived at three
- places might alone be sufficient. If, instead of taking the times of
- arrival of a shock, the arrival of a sea wave be taken, the result
- would be a closer approximate to the absolute truth.</p>
-
- <p>It will be observed that this method is not a direct one, but is one
- of trial. If, however, an imaginary case
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_202">202</span> be taken, and three given
- points of observation, <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>0</sub>,
- <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>1</sub>, <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>2</sub>,
- be plotted on a piece of paper, it will be found that it is not a
- difficult matter to determine two numbers proportional to <i>a</i> and <i>b</i>
- which will allow you to draw two circles so that they may be touched
- by a third circle drawn through <span class="smcap">a</span><sub>0</sub>. This problem has
- practically been applied in the case of the arrival of a sea wave
- at a number of places on the South American coast, at the time of
- the earthquake of May 9, 1877. This is illustrated as follows. The
- places which were chosen were Huanillos, Tocopilla, Cobija, Iquique,
- Mejillones.</p>
-
- <p>In the following table the first column gives the times at which the
- sea wave arrived at each of these places in Iquique time; in the second
- column the difference between these times and the time at which it
- reached Huanillos is given; in the third column the distances through
- which a sea wave, propagated at the rate of 350 feet per second, could
- travel during the intervals noted in the second column is given.</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="South America sea waves">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">Arrival of<br /> sea wave</th>
- <th class="ball">Time after<br />arrival at<br />Huanillos</th>
- <th class="ball">Distance<br />at 350 feet<br />per second</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <th class="bl">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="tdr bl"><div>h.</div></th>
- <th class="tdr br"><div>m.</div></th>
- <th class="tdr br"><div>minutes</div></th>
- <th class="tdr br"><div>miles</div></th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Huanillos</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>0</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>0</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Tocopilla</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>32</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Cobija</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>38</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>32</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl">Iquique</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>40</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>40</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl bl">Mejillones</td>
- <td class="tdr bl"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>46</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>16</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>64</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>The distances marked in the third column are used as radii of the
- circles drawn round the places to which they respectively refer.</p>
-
- <p>The centre of the circle drawn to touch the circles of the first
- column, and at the same time to pass through Huanillos, is marked
- <span class="smcap">c</span>.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_203">203</span></p>
-
- <p>The position from which the shock originated appears therefore to have
- occurred very near to a place lying in Long. 7° 15′ W. and Lat. 21° 22′ S.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p203.jpg" width="549" height="680" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 31.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>The actual operations which were gone through in making the
- accompanying map were as follows. First, the places with which we had
- to deal were represented on a map in orthographical projection, the
- centre of projection<span id="Page_204" class="pagenum">204</span>
- being near to the centre of the map. This was
- done so that the measurements which were made upon the map might be
- more correct than those we should obtain from an ordinary chart where
- this portion of the world was not the centre of projection. Next, a
- number was taken as equal to the velocity with which the sea wave had
- travelled. The first velocity taken was about 400 feet per second—this
- being about the velocity with which, theoretically, it must have
- travelled in an ocean having a depth equal to that indicated upon the
- charts—also it seemed to have travelled at this rate from the various
- times of arrival as recorded at places along the coast. Circles were
- then drawn round Tocopilla, Cobija, Iquique, and Mejillones with radii
- equal to 2, 8, 10, and 15, each multiplied by (60 × 400). It was then
- seen <em>by trial</em> that it was impossible to draw a single circle which
- should touch four circles and also pass through Huanillos. These four
- circles were, in fact, too large. Four new but smaller circles, which
- are shown in the map, were next drawn, their radii being respectively
- equal to the numbers 2, 8, 10, and 16, each multiplied by (60 × 350),
- and it was found that a circle, with a centre <span class="smcap">c</span>, could be
- drawn which would practically touch the four circles, and at the same
- time would pass through Huanillos.</p>
-
- <p>III. <em>The method of hyperbolas.</em>—The method which I call that of
- hyperbolas is only another form of the method of circles. It is,
- however, useful in special cases, as, for instance, where we have the
- times of arrival of earthquakes at only two stations. Between Tokio
- and Yokohama, at which places I frequently obtain tolerably accurate
- time records, the method has been applied on several occasions with
- advantage. In the preceding example let us suppose that the only time
- records which we had were for Huanillos and Mejillones, and that the
- wave was felt at the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_205">205</span>
- latter place sixteen minutes or 960 seconds after
- it was experienced at the former. Calling these places <span class="smcap">h</span> and
- <span class="smcap">m</span> respectively, round <span class="smcap">m</span> draw a circle equal to the
- 960 multiplied by the velocity with which the wave was propagated. It
- is then evident that the origin of this disturbance must be the centre
- of a circle which passes through <span class="smcap">h</span> and touches the circle
- drawn round <span class="smcap">m</span>. Join <span class="smcap">h m</span>, cutting the circle round
- <span class="smcap">m</span> in <span class="smcap">y</span>. Bisect <span class="smcap">y h</span> in <span class="smcap">v</span>. It is
- evident that <span class="smcap">v</span> is one possible origin for the disturbance.
- Next, from <span class="smcap">m</span>, in the direction of <span class="smcap">h</span>, draw any line
- <span class="smcap">m z p</span>; join <span class="smcap">z h</span>; bisect <span class="smcap">z h</span> at right angles
- by the line <span class="smcap">o p n</span>. Because <span class="smcap">ph</span> = <span class="smcap">pz</span>, it is
- evident that <span class="smcap">p</span> is a second possible origin. Proceeding in this
- way a series of points lying to the right and left of <span class="smcap">v</span> on
- the curve <span class="smcap">r v t</span> may be found, and we may therefore say that
- the origin lies somewhere in the curve <span class="smcap">r v t</span>. By increasing
- or decreasing our velocity we vary the position of the curve <span class="smcap">r v t</span>,
- and, instead of a line on which our origin may be, we obtain a
- band. As the assumed velocity increases, the circle round <span class="smcap">m</span>
- becomes larger, and has its limit when it passes through <span class="smcap">h</span>,
- where the two arms of the curve <span class="smcap">r v t</span> will close together
- and form a prolongation of the line <span class="smcap">m y h</span> as the assumed
- velocity diminishes. The circle round <span class="smcap">m</span> becomes smaller
- until it coincides with the point <span class="smcap">m</span>. At such a moment the
- curve <span class="smcap">r v t</span> opens out to form a straight line bisecting
- <span class="smcap">m h</span> at right angles. The curve <span class="smcap">r v t</span> is a hyperbola
- with a vertex <span class="smcap">v</span> and foci <span class="smcap">h</span> and <span class="smcap">m</span>. Inasmuch
- as <span class="smcap">pm</span> - <span class="smcap">ph</span> = a constant quantity. If we have the
- time given at which the shock or wave arrived at a third station as
- at Iquique, it is evident that a second hyperbola <span class="smcap">r′ v′ t′</span>
- might be drawn with Iquique and Huanillos as foci, and that the mutual
- intersection of these two hyperbolas with a third hyperbola, having for
- its foci Iquique and Mejillones, would give the origin of the wave.
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_206">206</span>
- The obtaining of a mutual intersection would depend on the assumed
- velocity, and the accuracy of the result, like that of the method
- of circles, would depend upon the trials we made. The method here
- enunciated may be carried farther by describing hyperboloids instead
- of hyperbolas, the mutual intersection of which surfaces would, in the
- case of an earth wave, give the actual origin or <em>centrum</em> rather than
- the point above the origin or <em>epicentrum</em>.</p>
-
- <p>IV. <em>The method of co-ordinates.</em>—Given the times at which a shock
- arrived at five or more places, the position of which we have marked
- upon a map, or chart, to determine the position on the map of the
- centre of the shock, its depth, and the velocity of propagation.</p>
-
- <p>Commencing with the place which was last reached by the shock, call
- these places <i>p</i>, <i>p</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>p</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>p</i><sub>3</sub>, and <i>p</i><sub>4</sub>, and let the
- times taken to reach these places from the origin be respectively <i>t</i>,
- <i>t</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>t</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>t</i><sub>3</sub>, and <i>t</i><sub>4</sub>.</p>
-
- <p>Through <i>p</i> draw rectangular co-ordinates, and with a scale measure the
- co-ordinates of <i>p</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>p</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>p</i><sub>3</sub>, and <i>p</i><sub>4</sub>, and let these
- respectively be <i>a</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>b</i><sub>1</sub>; <i>a</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>b</i><sub>2</sub>; <i>a</i><sub>3</sub>, <i>b</i><sub>3</sub>;
- <i>a</i><sub>4</sub>, <i>b</i><sub>4</sub>. Then if <i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, and <i>z</i> be the co-ordinates of the
- origin of the shock, <i>d</i>, <i>d</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>d</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>d</i><sub>3</sub>, and <i>d</i><sub>4</sub>, the
- respective distances of <i>p</i>, <i>p</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>p</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>p</i><sub>3</sub>, and <i>p</i><sub>4</sub>
- from this origin, and <i>v</i> the velocity of the shock, we have</p>
-
- <div class="list-container">
- <ol>
- <li><i>x</i><sup>2</sup> + <i>y</i><sup>2</sup> + <i>z</i><sup>2</sup> = <i>d</i><sup>2</sup> = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> <i>t</i><sup>2</sup></li>
- <li>(<i>a</i><sub>1</sub> - <i>x</i>)<sup>2</sup> + (<i>b</i><sub>1</sub> - <i>y</i>)<sup>2</sup> + <i>z</i><sup>2</sup> = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> <i>t</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup></li>
- <li>(<i>a</i><sub>2</sub> - <i>x</i>)<sup>2</sup> + (<i>b</i><sub>2</sub> - <i>y</i>)<sup>2</sup> + <i>z</i><sup>2</sup> = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> <i>t</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup></li>
- <li>(<i>a</i><sub>3</sub> - <i>x</i>)<sup>2</sup> + (<i>b</i><sub>3</sub> - <i>y</i>)<sup>2</sup> + <i>z</i><sup>2</sup> = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> <i>t</i><sub>3</sub><sup>2</sup></li>
- <li>(<i>a</i><sub>4</sub> - <i>x</i>)<sup>2</sup> + (<i>b</i><sub>4</sub> - <i>y</i>)<sup>2</sup> + <i>z</i><sup>2</sup> = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> <i>t</i><sub>4</sub><sup>2</sup></li>
- </ol>
- </div>
-
- <p>Because we know the actual times at which the waves arrived at the
- places <i>p</i>, <i>p</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>p</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>p</i><sub>3</sub>, <i>p</i><sub>4</sub>, we know the values
- <i>t</i>—<i>t</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>t</i>—<i>t</i><sub>2</sub>, <i>t</i>—<i>t</i><sub>3</sub>, <i>t</i>—<i>t</i><sub>4</sub>. Call these
- respectively <i>m</i>, <i>p</i>, <i>q</i>, and <i>r</i>. Suppose <i>t</i> known, then</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_207">207</span></p>
-
- <div class="list-container">
- <ul>
- <li><i>t</i><sub>1</sub> = <i>t</i> - <i>m</i></li>
- <li><i>t</i><sub>2</sub> = <i>t</i> - <i>p</i></li>
- <li><i>t</i><sub>3</sub> = <i>t</i> - <i>q</i></li>
- <li><i>t</i><sub>4</sub> = <i>t</i> - <i>r</i>.</li>
- </ul>
- </div>
-
- <p>Subtracting equation No. 1 from each of the equations 2, 3, 4, and 5,
- we obtain,</p>
-
- <div class="list-container">
- <ul>
- <li><i>a</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>b</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup> - 2<i>a</i><sub>1</sub> <i>x</i> - 2<i>b</i><sub>1</sub> <i>y</i> = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> (<i>t</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup> - <i>t</i><sup>2</sup>) = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> (<i>m</i><sup>2</sup> - 2<i>t</i> <i>m</i>)</li>
- <li><i>a</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>b</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup> - 2<i>a</i><sub>2</sub> <i>x</i> - 2<i>b</i><sub>2</sub> <i>y</i> = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> (<i>t</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup> - <i>t</i><sup>2</sup>) = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> (<i>p</i><sup>2</sup> - 2<i>t</i> <i>p</i>)</li>
- <li><i>a</i><sub>3</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>b</i><sub>3</sub><sup>2</sup> - 2<i>a</i><sub>3</sub> <i>x</i> - 2<i>b</i><sub>3</sub> <i>y</i> = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> (<i>t</i><sub>3</sub><sup>2</sup> - <i>t</i><sup>2</sup>) = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> (<i>q</i><sup>2</sup> - 2<i>t</i> <i>q</i>)</li>
- <li><i>a</i><sub>4</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>b</i><sub>4</sub><sup>2</sup> - 2<i>a</i><sub>4</sub> <i>x</i> - 2<i>b</i><sub>4</sub> <i>y</i> = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> (<i>t</i><sub>4</sub><sup>2</sup> - <i>t</i><sup>2</sup>) = <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> - 2<i>t</i> <i>r</i>)</li>
- </ul>
- </div>
-
- <p>Now let <i>v</i><sup>2</sup> = <i>u</i>, and 2<i>v</i><sup>2</sup> <i>t</i> = <i>w</i>.</p>
-
- <p>Then</p>
-
- <div class="list-container">
- <ol>
- <li>2<i>a</i><sub>1</sub> <i>x</i> + 2<i>b</i><sub>1</sub> <i>y</i> + <i>u</i> <i>m</i><sup>2</sup> - <i>n</i> <i>m</i> = <i>a</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>b</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup></li>
- <li>2<i>a</i><sub>2</sub> <i>x</i> + 2<i>b</i><sub>2</sub> <i>y</i> + <i>u</i> <i>p</i><sup>2</sup> - <i>n</i> <i>p</i> = <i>a</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>b</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup></li>
- <li>2<i>a</i><sub>3</sub> <i>x</i> + 2<i>b</i><sub>3</sub> <i>y</i> + <i>u</i> <i>q</i><sup>2</sup> - <i>n</i> <i>q</i> = <i>a</i><sub>3</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>b</i><sub>3</sub><sup>2</sup></li>
- <li>2<i>a</i><sub>4</sub> <i>x</i> + 2<i>b</i><sub>4</sub> <i>y</i> + <i>u</i> <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> - <i>n</i> <i>r</i> = <i>a</i><sub>4</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>b</i><sub>4</sub><sup>2</sup></li>
- </ol>
- </div>
-
- <p>We have here four simple equations containing the four unknown
- quantities <i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>u</i>, and <i>w</i>.</p>
-
- <p><i>x</i> and <i>y</i> determine the origin of the shock. The absolute velocity
- <i>v</i> equals √ <i>u</i>. From <i>v</i> and <i>w</i> we obtain <i>t</i>. Substituting
- <i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>v</i>, and <i>t</i> in the first equation we obtain <i>z</i>.</p>
-
- <p>We have here assumed that the points of observation have all about the
- same elevation above sea level.</p>
-
- <p>If it is thought necessary to take these elevations into account, a
- sixth equation may be introduced.</p>
-
- <p>If the propagation of the wave is considered as a horizontal one, as
- would be done when calculating the position of the <em>epicentrum</em> or
- point above the origin, by means of the times of arrival of a sea wave,
- the ordinate <i>z</i> of the first five equations would be omitted. Working
- in this way the resulting four equations, viz.</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- 2<i>a</i><sub>1</sub> <i>x</i> + 2<i>b</i><sub>1</sub> <i>y</i> + <i>u</i><i>m</i><sup>2</sup> - <i>w</i><i>m</i><sup>2</sup> = <i>a</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup> + <i>b</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup><br />
- &amp;c.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &amp;c.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &amp;c.
- </div>
-
- <p class="noindent">remained unchanged.</p>
-
- <p>Applying this method to the same example as that
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_208">208</span> used as illustration
- for the two previous methods, we obtain for the co-ordinates of
- Mejillones, Iquique, Cobija, Tocopilla, and Huanillos, measured in
- geographical miles, and the times in Iquique time at which the wave
- reached each, as given in the following table; <i>ox</i> and <i>oy</i> being,
- drawn through Mejillones.</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="South America sea waves 2">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">Co-ordinates</th>
- <th colspan="3" class="ball">Time of arrival</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <th class="bl br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">OX</th>
- <th class="br">OY</th>
- <th class="tdr"><div>h.</div></th>
- <th class="tdr "><div>m.</div></th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Mejillones</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div><i>a</i>&nbsp; or&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;0</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div><i>b</i>&nbsp; or&nbsp; &nbsp;0</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>46</div></td>
- <td class="br">p. m.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Iquique</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div><i>a<sub>1</sub></i> or 150</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div><i>b<sub>1</sub></i> or 96</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>40</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Cobija</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div><i>a<sub>2</sub></i> or&nbsp; &nbsp;36</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div><i>b<sub>2</sub></i> or 14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>38</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Tocopilla</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div><i>a<sub>3</sub></i> or&nbsp; &nbsp;66</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div><i>b<sub>3</sub></i> or 31</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>32</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl bl br">Huanillos</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div><i>a<sub>4</sub></i> or 102</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div><i>b<sub>4</sub></i> or 58</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>From this data we find the co-ordinates <i>x</i> and <i>y</i> of this origin to
- be 85·8 and 56·7; whilst the velocity of propagation = 45 feet per
- second.</p>
-
- <p>Measuring these ordinates upon the map, we obtain a centre lying very
- near Long. 71° 5′ W. and Lat. 21° 22′ S., a position which is very near
- to that which has already been obtained by other methods.</p>
-
- <p>If instead of Huanillos we substitute the ordinates and time of arrival
- of the sea wave for Pabalon de Pica, another point for the origin will
- be obtained lying farther out at sea. To obtain the best result, the
- method to be taken will evidently be, first to reject those places
- at which it seems likely that some mistake has been made with the
- time observations, and then with the remaining places to form as many
- equations as possible, and from these to obtain a mean value. This
- is a long and tedious process, and as the time observations of this
- particular earthquake are probably one and all more or less inaccurate,
- it is hardly worth while to follow the investigation farther.</p>
-
- <p>In this example, as in the preceding ones, it will be
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_209">209</span> observed that
- it has been sea waves that have been dealt with, rather than earth
- vibrations. It is evident, however, that these latter vibrations may be
- dealt with in a similar manner.</p>
-
- <p>In these determinations it will also have been observed that it
- is assumed that the disturbance has radiated from a centre, and,
- therefore, approached the various stations in different directions.
- If we assume that we have three stations very near to each other as
- compared with their distances from the origin, so that we can assume
- that the wave fronts at the various stations were parallel, the
- determination of the direction in which the wave advanced appears to be
- much simplified. The determination of the direction in which a wave has
- passed across three stations was first given by Professor Haughton.</p>
-
- <p><em>Haughton’s method.</em>—Given, the time of an earthquake shock at three
- places, to determine its horizontal velocity and coseismal line.</p>
-
- <p>The solution of this is contained in the formula</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- tan <i>ϕ</i> = <span class="frac"><sup><i>a</i> (<i>t<sub>2</sub></i> - <i>t<sub>1</sub></i>)
- sin β</sup><span>/</span><sub><i>c</i> (<i>t<sub>3</sub></i> - <i>t<sub>2</sub></i>) +
- <i>a</i> (<i>t<sub>2</sub></i> - <i>t<sub>1</sub></i>) cos β</sub></span>.
- </div>
-
- <p>When <span class="smcap">a</span>, <span class="smcap">b</span>, and <span class="smcap">c</span> are three stations at
- which a shock is observed at the times <i>t<sub>1</sub></i>, <i>t<sub>2</sub></i>, and <i>t<sub>3</sub></i>;
- <i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, and <i>c</i> are the distances between <span class="smcap">a</span>, <span class="smcap">b</span>,
- and <span class="smcap">c</span>, and <i>ϕ</i> is the angle made by the coseismal lines <i>x</i>
- <span class="smcap">a</span> <i>x</i>, <i>y</i> <span class="smcap">b</span> <i>y</i>, and the line <span class="smcap">a b</span>, which
- are assumed to be parallel.</p>
-
- <p>This I applied in the case of the Iquique earthquake, but owing to
- the smallness of the angles between the three stations <span class="smcap">a</span>,
- <span class="smcap">b</span>, and <span class="smcap">c</span>, the result was unsatisfactory. The problem
- ought to be restricted, first, to places which are a long distance
- away from a centre, and, secondly, to places which are not nearly in a
- straight line. This problem may be solved more readily by geometrical
- methods.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_210">210</span>
- Plot the three stations <span class="smcap">a</span>, <span class="smcap">b</span>, and
- <span class="smcap">c</span> on a map, join the two stations between which there was the
- greatest difference in the time observation. Let these, for example,
- be <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">c</span>. Divide the line <span class="smcap">a c</span> at point
- <span class="smcap">d</span>, so that <span class="smcap">a d</span> : <span class="smcap">d c</span> as the interval between
- the shock felt at <span class="smcap">a</span> and <span class="smcap">b</span> is to the interval between
- the shock felt at <span class="smcap">b</span> and <span class="smcap">c</span>. The line <span class="smcap">b d</span> will
- be parallel to the direction in which the wave advanced.</p>
-
- <p><em>The difference in time of the arrival of two disturbances.</em>—In the
- various calculations which have been made to determine an origin
- based on the assumption of a known or of a constant velocity, we have
- only dealt with a single wave, which may have been a disturbance in
- the earth or in the water. A factor which has not yet been employed
- in this investigation is the difference in time between the arrival
- of two disturbances; one propagated, for instance, through the
- earth, and the other, for example, through the ocean. The difference
- in the times of the arrival of two waves of this description is a
- quantity which is so often recorded that it is well not to pass it
- by unnoticed. To the waves mentioned we might also add sound waves,
- which so frequently accompany destructive earthquakes, and, in some
- localities, as, for instance, in Kameishi, in North Japan, are also
- commonly associated with earthquakes of but small intensity. It was by
- observing the difference in time between the shaking and the sound in
- different localities that Signor Abella was enabled to come to definite
- conclusions regarding the origin of the disturbances which affected the
- province of Neuva Viscoya in the Philippines, in 1881; the places where
- the interval of time was short, or the places where the two phenomena
- were almost simultaneous, being, in all probability, nearer to the
- origin than when the intervals were comparatively large. I myself
- applied the method with considerable success
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_211">211</span> when seeking for the
- origin of the Iquique earthquake of 1877. The assumptions made in that
- particular instance were, first, that the velocity of the disturbance
- through the earth was known, and, secondly, that the velocity with
- which a sea wave was propagated was also known.</p>
-
- <p>A method similar to the above was first suggested by Hopkins. It
- depended on the differences of velocity with which normal and
- transversal waves are propagated.<a id="FNanchor_86" href="#Footnote_86" class="fnanchor">[86]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Seebach’s method.</em>—To determine the true velocity of an earthquake,
- the time of the first shock, and the depth of the centre.</p>
-
- <div class="figright">
- <img src="images/i_p211.jpg" width="315" height="295" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 32.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>Let the straight line <span class="smcap">m</span>, <i>m<sub>1</sub></i>, <i>m<sub>2</sub></i>, <i>m<sub>3</sub></i> represent
- the surface of the earth shaken by an earthquake. For small
- earthquakes, to consider the surface of the earth as a plane will not
- lead to serious errors.</p>
-
- <p>If an earthquake originates at <span class="smcap">c</span>, then to reach the surface at
- <span class="smcap">m</span> it traverses a distance <i>h</i> in the time <i>t</i>. To reach the
- surface at <span class="smcap">m</span><sub>1</sub> it traverses a distance <i>h</i> + <i>x<sub>1</sub></i> in a
- time <i>t<sub>2</sub></i>. If <i>v</i> equals the velocity of propagation,</p>
-
- <div class="center">
- then <i>t</i> = <span class="frac"><sup><i>h</i></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>v</i></sub></span>,&nbsp;
- <i>t</i><sub>1</sub> = <span class="frac"><sup><i>h</i> + <i>x</i><sub>1</sub></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>v</i></sub></span>,
- </div>
-
- <div class="center">
- <i>t</i><sub>2</sub> = <span class="frac"><sup><i>h</i> + <i>x</i><sub>2</sub></sup><span>/</span><sub><i>v</i></sub></span>, &amp;c.
- </div>
-
- <p>Seebach now says that <em>if we have given the position of</em> <span class="smcap">m</span>
- <em>or epicentrum of the shock</em>, and draw through it rectangular axes
- like <span class="smcap">m</span> <i>m</i><sub>3</sub> and <span class="smcap">m</span> <span class="smcap">t</span><sub>3</sub>, and lay down
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_212">212</span>on <span class="smcap">m</span>
- <i>m<sub>3</sub></i> in miles the distances from M of the various
- stations which have been shaken, and in equal divisions for minutes
- lay down on <span class="smcap">m</span> <span class="smcap">t</span><sub>3</sub> the differences of time at which
- <span class="smcap">m</span>, <i>m</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>m</i><sub>2</sub>, &amp;c.
- were shaken, then <span class="smcap">m</span><sub>1</sub>
- <span class="smcap">t</span><sub>1</sub>, <span class="smcap">m</span><sub>2</sub>
- <span class="smcap">t</span><sub>2</sub>, &amp;c. are the co-ordinates
- of points on an hyperbola. The degree of exactness with which this
- hyperbola is in any given case constructed is a check upon the accuracy
- of the time observations and the position of the <em>epicentrum</em>. The apex
- of the hyperbola is the <em>epicentrum</em>.</p>
-
- <p>The intersection of the asymptote with the ordinate axis is the time
- point of the first shock, which, because the scale for time and
- for space were taken as equal, gives the absolute position of the
- <em>centrum</em>. This intersection is shown by dotted lines. Knowing the
- position of the <em>centrum</em>, we can directly read from our diagram how
- far the disturbance has been propagated in a given time.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XI">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_213">213</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XI.<br />
- <span class="subhead">THE DEPTH OF AN EARTHQUAKE CENTRUM.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- The depth of an earthquake centrum—Greatest possible depth of an
- earthquake—Form of the focal cavity.</div>
-
- <p><em>Depth of centrum.</em>—The first calculations of the depth at which an
- earthquake originated were those made by Mallet for the Neapolitan
- earthquake of 1857. These were made on the assumption that the earth
- wave radiated in straight lines from the origin, and, therefore, at
- points at different distances from the <em>epicentrum</em> it had different
- angles of emergence. These angles of emergence were chiefly calculated
- from the inclination of fissures produced in certain buildings, which
- were assumed to be at right angles to the direction of the normal
- motion. If we have determined the <em>epicentrum</em> of an earthquake and
- the muzoseismal circle, and make either the assumption that the angle
- of emergence in this circle has been 45° or 54° 44′ 9″ (see page
- 54), it is evidently an easy matter by geometrical construction to
- determine the depth of the <em>centrum</em>. Höfer followed this method when
- investigating the earthquake of Belluno.</p>
-
- <p>Other methods of calculation which have been employed are based on time
- observations, as, for instance, the method of Seebach, the method of
- co-ordinates, the method of hyperboloids or spheres (see pages 200–212).</p>
-
- <p>By means of a number of lines parallel to twenty-six
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_214">214</span> angles of
- emergence, drawn in towards the seismic vertical, Mallet found that
- twenty-three of these intersected at a depth of 7⅛ geographical
- miles. The maximum depth was 8⅛ geographical miles, and the minimum
- depth 2¾ geographical miles.</p>
-
- <p>The mean depth was taken at a depth of 5¾ geographical miles where,
- within a range of 12,000 feet, eighteen of the wave paths intersected
- the seismic vertical.</p>
-
- <p>The point where these wave paths start thickest is at a depth not
- greater than three geographical miles, and this is considered to be the
- vertical depth of the focal cavity itself.</p>
-
- <p>For the Yokohama earthquake of 1880, from the indications of
- seismometers, and by other means, certain angles of emergence were
- obtained, leading to the conclusion that the depth of origin of that
- earthquake might be between 1½ and 5 miles.</p>
-
- <p>Possibly, perhaps, the earthquake may have originated from a fissure
- the vertical dimensions of which was comprised between these depths.</p>
-
- <p>A source of error in a calculation of this description is that the
- vertical motions may have been a component of transverse motions or
- perhaps due to the slope of surface waves.</p>
-
- <p>The following table of the depths at which certain earthquakes have
- originated has been compiled from the writings of several observers.</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Earthquake depths">
- <tr>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th colspan="3" class="ball">In feet</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <th class="bl br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">Minimum</th>
- <th class="br">Mean</th>
- <th class="br">Maximum</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Rhineland</td>
- <td class="tdl br">1846 (Schmidt)</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>127,309</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Sillien</td>
- <td class="tdl br">1858 (Schmidt)</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>86,173</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&nbsp;</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Middle Germany</td>
- <td class="tdl br">1872 (Seebach)</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>47,225</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>58,912</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>70,841</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Herzogenrath</td>
- <td class="tdl br">1873 (Lasaulx)</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>16,553</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>36,516</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>56,477</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Neapolitan</td>
- <td class="tdl br">1857 (Mallet)</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>16,705</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>34,930</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>49,359</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl bl br">Yokohama</td>
- <td class="tdl br">1880 (Milne)</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>7,920</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>17,260</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>26,400</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_215">215</span></p>
-
- <p>A table similar to this has been compiled by Lasaulx.<a id="FNanchor_87" href="#Footnote_87" class="fnanchor">[87]</a></p>
-
- <p>With the exception of the determination for the two last disturbances
- these calculations have been made with the assistance of the method
- of Seebach, which depends, amongst other things, on the assumptions
- of exact time determinations, direct transmission of waves from the
- centrum, and a constant velocity of propagation.</p>
-
- <p>Admitting that our observations of time are practically accurate, it
- appears that the other assumptions may often lead to errors of such
- magnitude that our results may be of but little value.</p>
-
- <p>From what has been said respecting the velocity with which earth
- disturbances are propagated, it seems that these velocities may vary
- between large limits, being greatest nearest to the origin.</p>
-
- <p>If we refer to Seebach’s method, we shall see that a condition of this
- kind would tend to make the differences in time between various places,
- as we recede from the <em>epicentrum</em>, greater than that required for the
- construction of the hyperbola. The curve which is obtained would, in
- consequence, have branches steeper than that of the hyperbola, and the
- resultant depth, obtained by the intersection of the asymptotes of this
- curve with the seismic vertical, indicates an origin which may be much
- too great.</p>
-
- <p>Another point worthy of attention, which is common to the method
- of Mallet as well as to that of Seebach, is the question whether
- the shock radiates directly from the origin, or is propagated from
- the origin more or less vertically to the surface, and then spreads
- horizontally. We know that earthquakes, both natural and artificial,
- may be propagated as undulations on the surface of the ground, and
- that the vertical motion of the latter, as
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_216">216</span>testified by the records
- of well-constructed instruments, has no practical connection with the
- depth from which the disturbance originated.</p>
-
- <p>In cases like these, the direction of cracks in buildings, and other
- phenomena usually accredited to a normal radiation, may in reality be
- due to changes in inclination of the surface on which the disturbed
- objects rested. When our points of observation are at a distance from
- the <em>epicentrum</em> of the disturbance which, as compared with the depth
- of the same, is not great, calculations or observations based on the
- assumption of a direct radiation of the disturbance may possibly lead
- to results which are tolerably correct. The calculations of Mallet
- for the Neapolitan earthquake appear to have been made under such
- conditions.</p>
-
- <p>For smaller earthquakes, and for places at a distance from the seismic
- vertical of a destructive earthquake, the results which are deduced
- from the observations on shattered buildings, and all observations
- based upon the assumption of direct radiation, we must accept with
- caution.</p>
-
- <p>Another error which may enter into calculations of this description
- is one which has been discussed by Mallet at some length. This is the
- effect which the form and the position of the focal cavity may have
- upon the transmission of waves.</p>
-
- <p>Should the impulse originate from a point or spherical cavity, then
- we might, in a homogeneous medium perhaps, regard the isoseismals as
- concentric circles, and expect to find that equal effects had been
- produced at equal distances from the <em>epicentrum</em>. Should, however,
- this cavity be a fissure, it is evident that even in a homogeneous
- medium the inclination of the plane of such a cavity will have
- considerable effect upon the form of the waves which would radiate from
- its two walls.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_217">217</span></p>
-
- <p>For example, let it be assumed that the first impulse of an earthquake
- is due to the sudden formation of a fissure, rent open from its centre,
- and that the waves leave the walls at all points normal to its surface.
- Then, as Mallet points out, it is evident that the disturbance will
- spread out in ellipsoidal waves, the greatest axis of which will be
- perpendicular to the plane of the fissure.</p>
-
- <p>By taking a number of cases of fissures lying in various directions
- and drawing the ellipsoidal waves which would result from an elastic
- pressure, like that of steam suddenly admitted into such cavities, the
- differences in effect which would be simultaneously produced by these
- waves on reaching the surface can be readily understood. The following
- example of an investigation on this subject will serve as an example to
- illustrate the general nature of the many other cases which might be
- taken.</p>
-
- <div class="figright">
- <img src="images/i_p217.jpg" width="369" height="295" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 33.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>Let a disturbance simultaneously originate from all points of the
- fissure <i>f</i> <i>f</i>. This will spread outwards in ellipsoidal shells to
- the surface of the earth <i>e</i> <i>e</i>. The major axis of these ellipsoidal
- shells will be the direction of greatest effect. In the direction <i>c</i>
- <i>d</i> the waves will plunge into the earth, and places to the right side
- of the fissure will, to use an expression due to Stokes, when speaking
- of analogous phenomena connected with sound, be in <em>earthquake shadow</em>.
- The same expression has been<span class="pagenum" id="Page_218">218</span>
- employed, somewhat differently, when
- speaking of the effects produced on buildings.</p>
-
- <p>For places, like <i>s</i> and <i>p</i>, situated at equal distances from the
- seismic vertical, it is evident that the intensity of the shock will be
- different, and also its time of arrival. It will also be observed that
- the isoseismals will take the form of ovals or distorted ellipses, the
- larger or fuller end of which being to the left of the fissure.</p>
-
- <p>Other cases, like those just given, which are discussed by Mallet in
- his account of the Neapolitan earthquake, are where the fissure forms
- the division between materials of different elasticities. In the hard
- and more elastic material the waves will be more crowded, the velocity
- of a wave particle will be greater, and the transit will be quicker
- than in the less elastic medium.</p>
-
- <p>The result is that the distance of equal effect from the seismic
- vertical will be greatest in the direction of the more compressible
- material.</p>
-
- <p>Unless these considerations are kept carefully before the mind when
- investigating the depth and, we may add, the position and form of the
- centrum of an earthquake, serious errors may arise.</p>
-
- <p><em>Greatest depth of an earthquake origin.</em>—A curious but instructive
- calculation which Mallet made was a determination of the greatest
- possible depth at which an earthquake may occur. This calculation is
- based upon the idea that the impulsive effect of an earthquake has an
- intimate relationship with the height of neighbouring volcanoes, the
- column of lava supported on a volcanic cone being a measure of the
- internal pressure tending to rupture the adjacent crust of the earth.</p>
-
- <p>Mitchell, in 1700, virtually propounded this idea, when he suggested that
- the velocity of propagation of an earthquake was related to the height
- of such a column.<a id="FNanchor_88" href="#Footnote_88" class="fnanchor">[88]</a></p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_219">219</span></p>
-
- <p>Mallet showed that there was probably considerable truth in such a
- supposition by appealing to the results of actual observation. The
- pressure gauge of the Neapolitan district would be Vesuvius, the height
- of which has in round numbers varied between 3,500 to 4,000 feet. One
- of the most destructive earthquakes in this district—namely, the one of
- 1857—projected bodies with an initial velocity of about fifteen feet
- per second. The Riobamba earthquake, which projected bodies with an
- initial velocity of eighty feet per second, appears to have been the
- most violent earthquake, so far as its impulsive effort is concerned,
- of which we have any record. It occurred amongst the Andes, where there
- are volcanoes from 16,000 to 21,000 feet in height.</p>
-
- <p>Comparing these two earthquakes together, we see that the Riobamba
- shock had a destructive power 5·33 times that of the Neapolitan shock,
- and we also see that the Riobamba volcanoes were about 5·33 times
- higher than Vesuvius. The accordance in these quantities is certainly
- interesting, and tends to substantiate the idea that volcanoes are
- barometrical-like pressure gauges of a district.</p>
-
- <p>Carrying the argument still further. Mallet says that if the depth of
- origin of earthquakes were the same, then the <em>area of disturbance</em>
- would, for like formations and configuration of surface, be a measure
- of the earthquake effort, and also some function of the velocity of the
- wave. From this we may generally infer ‘that earthquakes, like that of
- Lisbon, which have a <em>very great area</em> of sensible disturbance, have
- also a very deep seismal focus, and also the greatest depth of seismal
- focus within our planet is probably not greater than that ascertained
- for this Neapolitan earthquake, multiplied by the ratio that the
- velocity of the Riobamba wave bears to that of its wave,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_220">220</span> or, what is
- the same thing, by the ratio of the altitudes of the volcanoes of the
- Andes to that of Vesuvius.’</p>
-
- <p>Now, as the depth of the Neapolitan shock may be taken at 34,930
- feet, the greatest probable depth of origin of any earthquake impulse
- occurring in our planet is limited to 5·333 × 4,930 feet, or 30·64
- geographical miles.</p>
-
- <p>Ingenious as this argument is, we can hardly admit it without certain
- qualifications.</p>
-
- <p>First, we are called upon to admit the identity of the originating
- cause of the volcano and the earthquake—as to what may be the
- originating cause of earthquakes we have yet to refer, but certainly in
- the case of particular earthquakes, as, for instance, those which occur
- in countries like Scotland, Scandinavia, and portions of Siberia, the
- direct connection between these phenomena are not at first sight very
- apparent.</p>
-
- <p>Secondly, even if we admit the identity of the origin of these
- phenomena, it is not difficult to imagine that the fluid pressure
- brought to bear upon certain portions of the crust of the earth may
- possibly in many instances be infinitely greater than that indicated
- by the height of the column of liquid lava in the throat of a volcano,
- the true height of which we are unable to obtain. Further, in certain
- instances such a column only appears to be a measure of the pressure
- upon the crust of the earth in the immediate vicinity of the cone.</p>
-
- <p>Thus, in the Sandwich Islands, we have lava standing in the throat
- of the volcano of Mauna Loa 10,000 feet higher than it stands in the
- crater Kilauea, only twenty miles distant. That these columns should be
- measures of the same pressure, originating in a general subterranean
- liquid layer with which they are connected, is a supposition difficult
- to satisfactorily substantiate.</p>
-
- <p>Another measure of the impulsive efforts which subterranean
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_221">221</span>terranean forces
- may exert upon the crust above them is evidently the height to which
- volcanoes eject materials. Cotopaxi is said to have hurled a 200-ton
- block of stone nine miles. Sir W. Hamilton tells us that in 1779
- Vesuvius shot up a column of ashes 10,000 feet in height; and Judd
- tells us that this same mountain in 1872 threw up vapours and rock
- fragments to the enormous height of 20,000 feet. This would indicate an
- initial velocity of 1,131 feet per second.</p>
-
- <p>Notwithstanding Mallet’s calculation that thirty miles is the limiting
- depth for the origin of an earthquake, the origin of the Owen’s
- Valley earthquake of March 1872 was estimated as being at least fifty
- miles.<a id="FNanchor_89" href="#Footnote_89" class="fnanchor">[89]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Form of the focal cavity.</em>—Among the various problems which are put
- before those who study the physics of the interior of our earth it
- would at first sight appear that there was none more difficult than the
- attempt to determine the form of the cavity, if it be a cavity, from
- which an earthquake originates. Almost all investigators of seismology
- have recognised that the birthplace of an earthquake is not a point,
- and have made suggestions about its general nature. The ordinary
- supposition is that the earthquake originates from a fissure, and if
- the focus of a disturbance could be laid bare to us it would have the
- appearance of a fault such as we so often see exposed on the faces of
- cliffs.</p>
-
- <p>A strong argument, tending to demonstrate that some of the shakings
- which are felt in Japan are due to the production of such fissures,
- is the fact that the vibrations which are recorded are transverse to
- a line joining the point of observation and the district from which,
- by time observations, we know the shock to have originated. The most
- probable explanation of this phenomena appears to
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_222">222</span>be that one mass
- of rock has been sliding across another mass, giving rise to shearing
- strains, and producing waves of distortion.</p>
-
- <p>The first seismologist who attacked the problem of finding out the
- dimensions and position of such a fissure was Mallet, when working on
- the Neapolitan earthquake of 1857. The reasons that the origin should,
- in the first place, have been a fissure, rather than any other form of
- cavity, was that such a supposition seemed to be <i xml:lang="la">a priori</i> the most
- probable, and, further, that it afforded a better explanation of the
- various phenomena which were observed, than that obtained from any
- other assumption.</p>
-
- <p>The method on which Mallet worked to determine the form and position of
- the assumed fissure, which method was subsequently more or less closely
- followed by other investigators, was as follows:—</p>
-
- <p>From an observation of the various phenomena produced upon the surface
- of the disturbed area, a map of isoseismals was constructed. These were
- seen, as has been the case with many earthquakes, not to distribute
- themselves in circles round the <em>epicentrum</em>, but as distorted oval or
- elliptical figures, the major axes of which roughly coincided with each
- other. Further, the <em>epicentrum</em>, did not lie in the centre of these
- ovals, but was near to the narrow end where they converged.</p>
-
- <p>This at once showed, if the reasoning respecting the manner in which
- waves are propagated from an inclined fissure be correct, that the
- fissure was at right angles to the major axis of the curves, dipping
- from their narrow end downwards, in the direction of their larger
- widespread ends.</p>
-
- <p>The next weapon which Mallet employed to attack this problem was the
- sound which was heard at different points round about the focus. These
- sounds appear to have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_223">223</span>
- been of the nature of sudden explosive reports
- accompanied by rushing, rolling sounds. The form of the area in which
- these sounds were heard was closely similar to that of the first two
- isoseismals. Except in the central area of great disturbance, no sound
- was heard to accompany the shock.</p>
-
- <p>Those at the northern and southern extremity of the sound area all
- described what they heard as a ‘low, grating, heavy, sighing rush, of
- twenty to sixty seconds’ duration.’ Those in the middle and towards the
- east and west boundaries of this area described a sound of the same
- tone, but shorter and more abrupt, and accompanied with more rumbling.</p>
-
- <p>The nature of the arguments which were followed in discussing the sound
- observations will be found in the chapter relating to these phenomena.</p>
-
- <p>A portion of the argument which it is difficult to follow relates to
- the maximum rate at which it can be supposed possible for a fissure to
- be rent in rocks, which rate depends on the density and elasticity of
- these rocks and other constant factors.</p>
-
- <p>Next it was observed that the paths of the waves drawn on the surface,
- although generally intersecting in a point, did not do so absolutely,
- but along a line passing through the main focus some 7½ miles in
- length. This, coupled with the observations of sounds, led to the
- supposition that the centre of disturbance, considered horizontally,
- originated along a curved line passing through the chief focus and the
- various intersections of the wave paths.</p>
-
- <p>The last phenomena brought forward to assist in the solution of this
- interesting problem were a study of the tremulous movements that
- preceded and followed the shock, and their relation to the sound
- phenomena.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_224">224</span></p>
-
- <p>If the earthquake originated by the formation of a fissure, after the
- rending has gone on for a certain time the focal cavity is enlarged
- to a certain extent, and the great shock takes place. This would be
- followed by concluding tremulous waves. A succession of phenomena like
- those accompanied the shock about which Mallet writes.</p>
-
- <p>By observations such as these, coupled with what has been said about
- the maximum and mean depths of the focal cavity, Mallet came to the
- conclusion that the focal cavity was a fissure, the rending open of
- which produced the earthquake. The vertical dimensions of this cavity
- were not more than 5·3 miles, but were probably limited to three miles.</p>
-
- <p>From the intersection of the wave paths upon the surface and the
- observed emergences, this fissure followed horizontally a curve of
- double flexure, about nine geographical miles in length. The area of
- this fissure was twenty-seven geographical miles. The time of rending
- it open in Apennine limestone would be about 7½ seconds, which
- should be the same as the period during which tremors were felt. The
- time actually recorded was six or eight seconds.</p>
-
- <p>Briefly, this is, then, the line of reasoning which was followed by
- Mallet in an investigation the results of which are as interesting
- as they are startling. Since the line of investigation has been
- opened, and the existence of new problems has been indicated, other
- investigators, although not exactly following Mallet’s method in
- all their details, have, when endeavouring to attain the same ends,
- employed similar weapons.</p>
-
- <p>Thus, for example, Seebach, when determining the depth and nature of
- the origin of the earthquake of Middle Germany, reasoned somewhat as
- follows:—</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_225">225</span></p>
-
- <p>Had the origin been more or less of a spherical cavity, then the region
- of most violent disturbance upon the surface would, according to a
- theorem we have already mentioned, have been upon or near a circle of
- about 8·8 miles in radius round the <em>epicentrum</em>. This region, however,
- was found by observation to lie along a curved band about forty miles
- in length, altogether on one side of the <em>epicentrum</em>.</p>
-
- <p>To explain this anomaly Seebach followed Mallet, and assumed that the
- origin was not a spherical cavity, but a fissure.</p>
-
- <p>The depth and strike of this fissure was determined by the observation
- that the area of greatest disturbance was along a curved line lying
- radial to the <em>epicentrum</em>. Such a condition it was assumed indicated
- that the fissure of origin must be inclined towards this area of
- greatest disturbance. A line was then drawn from this area to the
- <em>centrum</em>. A second line at right angles to this one gave the dip of
- the fissure.</p>
-
- <p>Höfer, when working on the earthquake of Belluno, came to the
- conclusion that the disturbance originated from two faults meeting
- each other at an angle of 60°. In this determination he was chiefly
- influenced by the form of a certain homoseist which was of the form of
- an elongated ellipse met on one side by a second ellipse, the principal
- axes of the two ellipses giving the strike of the two faults.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XII">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_226">226</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XII.<br />
- <span class="subhead">DISTRIBUTION OF EARTHQUAKES IN SPACE AND TIME.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- General distribution of earthquakes—Occurrence along lines—Examples
- of distribution—Italian earthquake of 1873—In Tokio—Extension
- of earthquake boundaries—Seismic energy in relation to
- geological time; to historical time—Relative frequency of
- earthquakes—Synchronism of earthquakes—Secondary earthquakes.</div>
-
- <p><em>General distribution of earthquakes.</em>—The records of earthquakes
- collected by various seismologists lead us to the conclusion that
- at some time or other every country and every ocean in the world
- has experienced seismic disturbances. In some countries earthquakes
- are felt daily, and from what will be said in the chapter on earth
- pulsations it is not unlikely that every large earthquake might with
- proper instrumental appliances be recorded at any point on the land
- surfaces of our globe. The area over which any given earthquake extends
- is indeterminate. The area over which an earthquake is sensible is
- sometimes very great. The Lisbon shock of 1755 is estimated as having
- been sensible over an area of 3,300 miles long and 2,700 miles wide,
- but in the form of tremors and pulsations it may have shaken the whole
- globe.</p>
-
- <p>The regions in which earthquakes are frequent are indicated in the
- accompanying map, which, to a great extent, is a reproduction of a map
- drawn by Mallet. The regions coloured with the darkest tint are those
- where<span class="pagenum" id="Page_227">227</span>
- great earthquakes are the most frequent. The actual number of
- earthquakes which have been felt in the differently coloured areas are
- given, when speaking of the relation of seismic energy to season.</p>
-
- <p>When looking at this chart it must be remembered that if we were
- to make a detailed map of any one of the different countries where
- earthquakes are frequent, we should find in it all the differences that
- we observe in the general chart. For instance, one portion of Japan,
- where perhaps sixty shocks are felt per year, would be coloured with
- a dark tint, whilst other portions of the same country, where there
- is only one slight shaking felt every few years, would be left almost
- uncoloured. The black dots indicating the position of volcanic vents
- are even more general in their signification than the tinted areas.
- Professor Haughton gives for the world a list of 407 volcanoes, 225 of
- which are active. These numbers are the same as those given by A. von
- Humboldt. Of the active volcanoes 172 are on the margin of the Pacific,
- and of the total number eight are in Japan. From my own observations
- in Japan independently of the Kurile Islands, I have enumerated
- fifty-three volcanoes which are either active or have been active
- within a recent period. In a few years’ time this list will probably be
- increased. I mention this fact to show how very imperfect our knowledge
- is respecting the number of volcanic vents existing on our globe. If we
- were in a position to indicate the volcanoes which had been in eruption
- during the last 4,000 years, the probability is that they would number
- several thousands rather than four or five hundred.</p>
-
- <p>An inspection of the map shows that earthquakes chiefly occur in
- volcanic and mountainous regions. The most earthquake-shaken regions of
- the world form the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_228">228</span>
- boundaries of the Pacific ocean. It may be remarked
- that these boundaries slope beneath the neighbouring ocean at a much
- steeper angle than the boundaries of countries where earthquakes occur
- but seldom. The coasts of South America, Kamschatka, the Kuriles,
- Japan, and the Sandwich Islands, for example, have slopes beneath the
- Pacific from one in twenty to one in thirty. The coasts of Australia,
- Scandinavia, and the eastern parts of South America, where earthquakes
- are practically unknown, have slopes from one in fifty to one in two
- hundred and fifty. Many earthquakes have taken place in mid-ocean. In
- the Atlantic Ocean M. Perrey has given about 140 instances of such
- occurrences.</p>
-
- <p>The majority of the earthquakes which shake Japan appear to have their
- origin in the neighbouring ocean. If we could draw a map of earthquake
- origins, it is probable that the greater number of the marks indicating
- these origins would be found to be suboceanic and along lines parallel
- to the shores of continents and islands which rise steeply from the
- bed of deep oceans. In countries like Switzerland and India, our marks
- would hold a relationship to the mountains of these countries.<a id="FNanchor_90" href="#Footnote_90" class="fnanchor">[90]</a>
- Looking at the broad features of the globe, we see on its surface
- many vast depressions. Some of these saucer-like hollows form land
- surfaces, as in central Asia. The majority of these, however, are
- occupied by the oceans. Active volcanoes chiefly occur near the rim of
- the hollows which have the steepest slopes. The majority of earthquakes
- probably have their origin on or near the bottom of these slopes. To
- these, however, there are exceptions, as for instance the earthquakes
- in the Alps, in the hills of <span class="pagenum" id="Page_229">229</span>
- Scotland, and the shakings which are
- occasionally felt in countries like Egypt. The earthquakes which shake
- the borders of the Pacific have their origins in, and their effects are
- almost exclusively felt on, the sides of the bounding ridge facing this
- ocean. In Japan it is the eastern sides of the islands which suffer,
- the western side being almost as free from these convulsions as England.</p>
-
- <p>Similar remarks may be made about the eastern side of South America,
- especially the southern portion of the continent. At Buenos Ayres, for
- example, there has been no disturbance since Mendoza was destroyed,
- some twenty years ago. In British Guiana slight shocks are occasionally
- felt in the low delta which forms the settled portion of the colony,
- but they are extremely rare.</p>
-
- <p><em>Disturbances in lines or zones.</em>—It has often been observed that
- disturbances are propagated along the length of mountains or valleys,
- and it is but seldom that earthquakes cross them transversely. Thus the
- valleys of the Rhone, the Rhine, and the Danube are lines along which
- disturbances travel.</p>
-
- <p>The major axes of the elliptical areas of disturbances which have
- shaken India have a general direction parallel to the valley of the
- Ganges along the flanks of the Himalayas.</p>
-
- <p>The disturbances which have shaken London appear to have been chiefly
- east and west, or along the valley of the Thames. In South America the
- line of disturbance is along the western sides of the Andes. Another
- line is along the northern coast of the continent through Andalusia
- and Caraccas towards the Antilles and Trinidad. The shocks of the
- Pyrenees are chiefly felt along the southern side of these mountains.
- In the middle and on the northern side they are but seldom felt. This
- propagation in lines or zones may in certain cases be apparent rather
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_230">230</span>
- than real. Thus the north and south ranges of mountains in Japan are
- mountains almost simultaneously shaken along their eastern flanks,
- giving the impression that an earthquake had originated simultaneously
- from a fissure parallel to this line, or else, starting at one end,
- had run down their lengths. Time observations have, however, shown
- that such disturbances had their origin at some distance in the ocean,
- and, travelling inwards, had reached all points on the flanks of these
- mountains almost simultaneously. The same explanation will probably
- hold for the so-called linear disturbances of western South America.</p>
-
- <p>All earthquake disturbances have probably a tendency to radiate from
- their source, and are only prevented from doing so by meeting with
- heavy mountainous districts, which by their mass and structure absorb
- the energy communicated to them. Much energy is also lost by emergence
- on the open flanks of a range of mountains. Rather than say that
- high mountains often bound the extension of an earthquake, or that
- earthquakes appear to run along the flanks of such mountains, we might
- say that earthquakes have boundaries parallel to the strike of the
- rocks in a given district, that such a direction is the one in which
- the propagation is the easier.</p>
-
- <p>Rossi is of opinion that volcanic fractures play an important part in
- governing the distribution of seismic disturbances. When a volcano is
- formed, a series of starlike fractures are formed round the central
- crater. Secondary craters may indicate the line of these fissures. The
- mountains about Rome are regarded as typical of this radial structure.
- The more distant the secondary craters are from the centre of the
- system, the smaller will they be, and also the younger. If two fissures
- intersect we get a larger crater at the junction. Earthquakes are
- propagated along the direction of these fissures, whilst the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_231">231</span> rising
- and falling of these lips throw off transverse waves. Rossi adduces
- observations which appear to meet with explanation on such suppositions.</p>
-
- <p>Suess, who has written upon the earthquakes of lower Austria, shows how
- the majority of the disturbances have had their origin along certain
- lines which form a break in the continuity of the Alps. One line runs
- north-east from Bruck towards Vienna. Near Wiener Neustadt, where the
- greatest number and heaviest shocks have occurred, this line is met by
- a north-north-west line crossing the Danube and following the valley
- of the river Kamp.<a id="FNanchor_91" href="#Footnote_91" class="fnanchor">[91]</a> Hoeffer has drawn similar lines from the head
- of the Adriatic, one set running north-north-east to intersect near
- Litschau, and the other north-north-west to intersect near Frankfort in
- the valley of the Rhine.<a id="FNanchor_92" href="#Footnote_92" class="fnanchor">[92]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Examples of distribution.</em>—A curious example of the distribution of
- seismic movement is that of the earthquake of March 12, 1873, worked
- out by Professor P. A. Serpieri. This earthquake appears to have been
- simultaneously felt on the Dalmatian coast and in central Italy, in a
- region lying north-east from Rome and south-east from Florence. In both
- of these areas the motion was from south-east to north-west. The shock
- then radiated from the central Italian regions, so that at places on
- the western shore of the Adriatic it was felt after it had been felt on
- the Dalmatian coast.</p>
-
- <p>Many explanations might be offered for this peculiar distribution
- of seismic activity. Possibly the shock originated at a great depth
- beneath the bed of the southern part of the Adriatic, and by following
- existing lines of weakness simultaneously reached the surface of the
- earth in central Italy and Dalmatia.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_232">232</span></p>
-
- <p>In Tokio, which is built partly on a flat plain, partly in valleys
- denuded from a low tableland, and partly on the spurs of the tableland
- itself, the distribution of earthquakes is a subject yet requiring
- attention. Sometimes it has happened that persons in one house have
- been sufficiently alarmed to escape into the open air, whilst others,
- not more than a mile distant, have not been aware that the city had
- been shaken.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p232.jpg" width="302" height="430" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 34.</span><br />
- <div class="list-container">
- <div class="left nowrap">
- <div>
- Areas almost simultaneously struck from S.E. to N.W.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
- <img class="iglyph-a" src="images/i_p232a.png" alt="" width="40" height="40" />
- </div>
- <div>
- Subsequent radial disturbance&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
- <img class="iglyph-b" src="images/i_p232b.png" width="36" height="60" alt="" />
- </div>
- </div>
- </div>
- </div>
- </div>
-
- <p><em>Extension of earthquake boundaries.</em>—Natural obstructions which may be
- sufficient to retard small earthquakes may in certain instances not be
- found sufficient to retard the larger disturbances. Thus the shocks of
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_233">233</span>
- Calabria are usually only felt on the western side of the Apennines,
- but instances have occurred when they have crossed this barrier. In
- 1801 the earthquake of Cumana crossed a branch of the coast range.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes earthquake boundaries give way, and countries which they
- sheltered subsequently become exposed to all disturbances. The true
- explanation of this is probably in a shifting of the centre of seismic
- activity. Thus up to December 14, 1797, although Cumana was often
- devastated, the peninsula of Araya was not hurt. On this date Araya
- commenced to suffer, and has continued to suffer ever since.</p>
-
- <p>Fuchs gives an example of the movement of a seismic centre in the case
- of the Calabrian earthquake. The first shock commenced near Oppiedo,
- the second shock commenced four or five miles farther to the north, and
- the third shock had its origin five or six miles still farther, near to
- Girifalco.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XIII">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_234">234</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XIII.<br />
- <span class="subhead">DISTRIBUTION OF EARTHQUAKES IN TIME (<i>continued</i>).</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <p><em>Seismic energy in relation to geological time.</em>—If we admit that
- seismic energy is only a form of volcanic energy, it must also be
- admitted that any cause tending to produce a general decrease in the
- amount of the latter will also produce an alteration in the amount of
- the former.</p>
-
- <p>The nebular hypothesis of Laplace tells us that the solar system is the
- result of the whirling of a heated gaseous mass, which as it cooled
- continually contracted and consequently whirls the faster. With this
- hypothesis before us, we understand why all the planets and their
- satellites have a similarity in the directions of their movements, why
- they revolve nearly in the same plane, in orbits nearly circular, why
- some have a flattened figure and are surrounded by rings or belts, why
- the exterior planets should have a greater velocity of rotation, a
- greater number of satellites, and a less density as compared with the
- interior planets, the similarity of the elements in meteoric stones,
- the sun, the stars, and those found upon our earth, and lastly why
- there should be an increase in temperature as we descend into our
- earth.<a id="FNanchor_93" href="#Footnote_93" class="fnanchor">[93]</a> This increase in temperature as we descend into the earth
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_235">235</span>
- as deduced from many observations appears to be about 1° F. for every
- fifty or sixty feet of descent.</p>
-
- <p>To explain this and other kindred phenomena it is assumed that the
- earth was once very much hotter than it is at present, and to reach its
- present stage it has been gradually cooling. As the laws of cooling are
- perfectly known, to calculate how many years it must have taken a body
- like our earth to cool down to its present temperature is a definite
- problem. Sir William Thomson, starting with the temperature of 7,000°
- F., when all the rocks of the earth must have been molten and a skin or
- crust upon the surface, such as is so quickly produced upon the surface
- of molten lava, finds by calculation that the time taken to reach the
- present temperature must have been about one hundred million years.
- Into this period he and other physicists desire to compress the history
- of all the stratified deposits. Geologists find this period too short.
- Others seeking to reconcile the views of physicists and geologists
- endeavour to show that the various agencies engaged in degrading rocks
- and accumulating sediments in former ages are not to be judged of by
- the agencies we now see around us; in former times they were more
- active. At one period the elastic tides in the earth may have been so
- great that they resulted in the fracturing off from our planet its
- satellite the moon, and subsequently the moon, acting on the waters of
- the earth, may, even as late as 150,000 years ago, have produced every
- three hours tides 150 feet in height.</p>
-
- <p>Whatever may be the value of the figures here quoted, reasonings like
- these bring us to the conclusions that the various agencies which we
- now know to be acting upon our earth were once far more potent than
- they are at present, and if the moon, as a producer of elastic tides,
- has any influence upon the occurrence of earthquakes,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_236">236</span> it must have had
- a much greater influence in bygone times.</p>
-
- <p>We might speak similarly with regard to the internal heat of the earth.</p>
-
- <p>From the present heat gradient of our globe it is possible to calculate
- how much heat flows from the earth every year.</p>
-
- <p>This is equivalent to a quantity which would raise a layer of water ·67
- centimetres thick, covering the whole of our globe, from a temperature
- of 0° to 100° C.</p>
-
- <p>Similarly, we might calculate the quantity of heat which would be lost
- when the average heat gradient, instead of being 1° F. for fifty feet
- of descent, was 1° F. for twenty-five feet of descent.</p>
-
- <p>We might also calculate how many years ago it was since such a gradient
- existed.</p>
-
- <p>The general result which we should arrive at would be that in past
- ages the loss of heat was more rapid than it is at present. Now the
- contraction of a body as it cools is for low temperatures proportional
- to its loss of heat, and this law is also probably true for contraction
- as it takes place from high temperatures.</p>
-
- <p>Contraction being more rapid, it is probable that phenomena like
- elevations and depressions would be more rapid than they are at
- present, and generally all changes due to plutonic action, as has
- already been pointed out by Sir William Thomson, must have been more
- active.</p>
-
- <p>We have, therefore, every reason to imagine that earthquakes which
- belong to the category of phenomena here referred to were also numerous
- and occurred on a grander scale during the earlier stages of the
- world’s history than they do at present, and seismic and volcanic
- energy, when considered in reference to long periods of time, is
- probably a decreasing energy.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_237">237</span></p>
-
- <p>In making this statement we must not overlook the fact that in
- geological time, as testified by the records of our rocks, volcanic
- action, and with it probably seismic action, has been continually
- shifting, first appearing in one area and then in another, and even
- in the same area we have evidence to show that these have periods
- of activity and repose successively succeeding each other. Thus in
- Britain, during the Palæozoic times, we have many evidences of an
- intense volcanic activity. During the Mesozoic or Secondary period
- volcanic energy appears to have subsided, to wake up with renewed
- vigour in the Cainozoic or Tertiary period.</p>
-
- <p>During this latter period it is not at all improbable that Scotland
- was in past times as remarkable for its earthquakes as Japan is at the
- present day.</p>
-
- <p>Later on it will also be shown that earthquakes are concomitant
- phenomena, with those elevatory processes which we have reason to
- believe are slowly going on in certain portions of the earth’s crust.
- If, therefore, we are able by the examination of the rocks which
- constitute the accessible portions of our globe to determine which
- periods were characterised by elevation, we may assume that such
- periods were also periods of seismic activity.</p>
-
- <p>Amongst these periods we have those in which various mountain ranges
- appeared. Thus the Grampians, and the mountains of Scandinavia, were
- probably produced before the deposition of the Old Red sandstone. The
- Urals were upheaved prior to Permian times. The chief upheaval in the
- Alps took place after Eocene times. The Rigi and other sub-Alpine
- mountains were formed after the deposition of the Miocene beds. About
- this same time the Himalayas were upheaved.<a id="FNanchor_94" href="#Footnote_94" class="fnanchor">[94]</a></p>
-
- <p>The earthquakes which from time to time shake those
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_238">238</span>newer mountains
- apparently indicate that the process of mountain-making is hardly ended.</p>
-
- <p><em>Seismic energy in relation to historical time.</em>—The distribution
- of seismic energy with regard to historical time is a subject which
- has been very carefully examined by Mallet, who collected together
- a catalogue of between six and seven thousand earthquakes, embraced
- between the periods <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 1606 and <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 1850. The
- earthquake of <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 1606 was on the occasion of the delivery of
- the law at Mount Sinai. Between <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 1604 and <span class="smcap">b.c.</span>
- 1586 an earthquake probably occurred in Arabia, when Korah, Dathan,
- and Abiram were swallowed up. Another biblical record is that of
- <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 1566, when the walls of Jericho were overthrown.</p>
-
- <p>The earliest records from China is in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 595; in Japan
- <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 285; in India <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 894.</p>
-
- <p>By using the number of earthquakes which have been recorded in each
- century as ordinates, Mallet constructed a curve, which apparently
- shows a continual increase in seismic energy, especially during recent
- times. This, Mallet remarks, contradicts all the analogies of the
- physics of the globe, and points out that the rapid increase in the
- number of earthquakes in latter years is chiefly due to the greater
- number of records which have been made, and the increase of the area
- of observation. No doubt many of the records made by the ancients have
- been lost.</p>
-
- <p>If we compare Mallet’s records, as he invites us to do, with the
- great outlines of human progress, we see that the two increase
- simultaneously, and we come to the conclusion that, taken as a whole,
- during the historical period the seismic activity of the world has been
- tolerably constant.</p>
-
- <p>These conclusions, based on the evidence at our
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_239">239</span> command, are not to
- be confuted. If, however, instead of considering the seismic energy of
- the whole world, we consider the seismic energy of particular areas,
- it seems reasonable to expect that in certain instances sometimes a
- decrease and sometimes an increase in this energy might be discovered,
- especially, perhaps, in areas which are highly volcanic.</p>
-
- <p>In France we know that volcanic activity ceased at a period closely
- bordering on historical times, and it is not unlikely that seismic
- activity may have ceased at a corresponding time.</p>
-
- <p>In a country like Japan, it is possible that in one district seismic
- energy may be on the increase, whilst in another upon the decrease.</p>
-
- <p>In a country like England, it is probable that the seismic state is
- constant, and, whatever changes may be now occurring, they are taking
- place at so slow a rate that, even if our records of the historical
- period were complete, we could hardly be expected to find these changes
- sufficiently marked to be observable.</p>
-
- <p>For purposes of reference, and also for examining the present question,
- the table, page 240, has been compiled. The earthquakes given are
- chiefly those which have been recorded in histories as being more or
- less destructive.</p>
-
- <p>In the second column of this table will be seen the number of
- earthquakes which have occurred in Japan during each century, the
- centuries being marked in the first column. In columns 3 to 18
- inclusive are given the number of earthquakes which have occurred
- during different centuries in the various countries and districts
- mentioned at the head of each column. These latter, which are taken
- from the writings of Mallet, are given for the sake of comparison with
- the Japanese earthquakes. If we commence with the seventh century in
- the column for Japan, we see that a great increase in the number of earthquakes,
- as we come towards the present time, is not so observable as it is in
- the other columns.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_240">240</span></p>
-
- <div class="left hang2">Key:</div>
-
- <table class="ml5 mb2 lh1" summary="Earthquakes per country key">
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>1</div></td> <td class="tdr">Centuries</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>2</div></td> <td>Japan</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>3</div></td> <td>Scandinavia and Iceland</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>4</div></td> <td>British Isles and Northern Isles</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>5</div></td> <td>Spanish Peninsula</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>6</div></td> <td>France, Belgium, Holland</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>7</div></td> <td>Rhine Basin</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>8</div></td> <td>Switzerland and Rhine Basin</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>9</div></td> <td>Danube Basin</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>10</div></td> <td>Italy, Sicily, Sardinia, and Malta</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>11</div></td> <td>Supplemental table for Italy, Sardinia, and Malta</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>12</div></td> <td>Turco-Hellenic Territory, Syria, Ægean Isles, and Levant</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>13</div></td> <td>United States and Canada</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>14</div></td> <td>Mexico and Central America</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>15</div></td> <td>Antilles</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>16</div></td> <td>Cuba</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>17</div></td> <td>Chili and La Plata Basin</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>18</div></td> <td>Northern Zone of Asia</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="tdr"><div>19</div></td> <td>Approximate Intensity in the Kioto District of Japan</td></tr>
- </table>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Earthquakes per country">
- <tr class="bb">
- <th class="ball">1</th>
- <th class="ball">2</th>
- <th class="ball">3</th>
- <th class="ball">4</th>
- <th class="ball">5</th>
- <th class="ball">6</th>
- <th class="ball">7</th>
- <th class="ball">8</th>
- <th class="ball">9</th>
- <th class="ball">10</th>
- <th class="ball">11</th>
- <th class="ball">12</th>
- <th class="ball">13</th>
- <th class="ball">14</th>
- <th class="ball">15</th>
- <th class="ball">16</th>
- <th class="ball">17</th>
- <th class="ball">18</th>
- <th class="ball">19</th>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>I.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>II.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>III.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>IV.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>23</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>V.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>19</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>VI.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td rowspan="10" class="tdr br"><div>19</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>VII.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>15</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>VIII.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>17</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>IX.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>40</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>21</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>19</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>60</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>X.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>17</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>24</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>XI.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>20</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>16</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>28</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>XII.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>22</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>23</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>20</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>XIII.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>16</div></td>
- <td rowspan="5" class="tdr br"><div>28</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>26</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>16</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>XIV.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>19</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>21</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>20</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>51</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>25</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>XV.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>36</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>18</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>47</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>29</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>XVI.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>17</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>61</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>52</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>35</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>32</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>22</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>17</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>XVII.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>26</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>91</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>29</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>120</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>31</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>121</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>53</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>16</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>11</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>XVIII.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>31</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>111</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>63</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>93</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>237</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>71</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>141</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>88</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>438</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>20</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>124</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>88</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>24</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>85</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>32</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdr bl br"><div>XIX.</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>113</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>110</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>85</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>211</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>81</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>173</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>145</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>390</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>88</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>194</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>51</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>145</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>50</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>170</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>57</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_241">241</span></p>
-
- <p>The explanation for this probably lies in the fact that Japan has
- practised civilised arts for a longer period than many of the European
- and other countries mentioned in the table.</p>
-
- <p>In Japan, no doubt, the records of later years have been more perfect
- than they were in early times, but this, although so potent an effacer
- of what was probably the true state of natural phenomena in the case of
- Europe, has not quite obliterated the truth in Japan; for instead of an
- apparent increase of seismic energy since early times it shows a slight
- decrease.</p>
-
- <p>To draw up a table of earthquakes such as the one which has just been
- given, and then, after the inspection of it, draw conclusions as to
- whether there has been an increase or decrease in seismic energy, is,
- however, hardly a just method of reasoning. The earthquakes, taken as
- they are, for the whole of Japan, represent a collection of places some
- of which are 1,000 miles apart. When we consider that many earthquakes
- which occurred at one end of this line were never felt at the other
- end, in order to justly estimate the periodicity of seismic phenomena
- it would seem that we ought either to take some particular seismic area
- or else the whole world.</p>
-
- <p>The particular area which has been taken is that of Kioto in Central
- Japan, and the earthquakes which have been felt there are enumerated in
- the table.</p>
-
- <p>In order to show the variation in seismic activity of this district a
- curve has been plotted, fig. 35, with ordinates equal to the values
- given for the Kioto earthquakes during succeeding centuries. The upper
- points of these ascending and descending lines are
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_242">242</span> joined by a free
- curve. The lower points are similarly joined. The points of bisection
- of ordinates drawn between these two curves are taken as points in a
- curve to show the true secular change in seismic energy.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p242.jpg" width="700" height="209" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 35.</span>—Curve of Seismic Intensity for Kioto.</div>
- </div>
-
- <p>By looking at this wavy line it will be seen that the intervals between
- maxima and minima are closer together in early times than they are
- later on.</p>
-
- <p>Thus, between the eighth century and the ninth century, points of
- maximum and minimum seismic efforts occurred at times a century apart,
- whilst later on, from the eleventh to the fifteenth century, they were
- at intervals of 300 years apart.</p>
-
- <p>By inspecting either the wavy line or the resultant curve, it will be
- seen that since the ninth century down to the present time there has
- been a decided decrease in seismic energy. From the ninth century down
- to the fifteenth century this decrease is represented by a
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_243">243</span> regular
- curve. At this point, however, the decrease becomes slightly more
- rapid, and is represented by a second curve. If, instead of calculating
- ordinates for my curve, in which intensity has been considered, simply
- the number of earthquakes are counted, a similar result is obtained.
- From this it appears that the rate at which seismic energy decreased
- during the last 500 years was about the same as that at which it
- decreased during the 500 years previous to this period.</p>
-
- <p>If the lists for the Italian and Turco-Hellenic districts could be
- similarly analysed, and the earthquakes of any particular district
- picked out from the others, it is very probable that a similar decrease
- or alteration in seismic energy might be observed.</p>
-
- <p>Provided that we have at our disposal records of the various
- earthquakes which have occurred in any given district during a
- sufficiently long period of time, one conclusion that we may expect
- to arrive at is that we shall be able to trace some variation in
- the seismic activity of that district. For the Kioto area, it has
- been shown that there is a diminution in seismic activity, In other
- districts, however, there may possibly be an increase.<a id="FNanchor_95" href="#Footnote_95" class="fnanchor">[95]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Relative frequency of earthquakes.</em>—A question which is of great
- interest to those who dwell in shaken districts is as to how often
- disturbances may be expected to occur.</p>
-
- <p>From a general examination of this question, considering the
- earthquakes of the whole world. Mallet arrived at the following
- conclusions:—</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_244">244</span></p>
-
- <p>1. While the smallest or minimum paroxysmal intervals may be a year
- or two, the average interval is from five to ten years of comparative
- repose.</p>
-
- <p>2. The shorter intervals are in connection with periods of fewer
- earthquakes—not always with those of least intensity, but usually so.</p>
-
- <p>3. The alternations of paroxysm and of repose appear to follow no
- absolute law deducible from these curves.</p>
-
- <p>4. Two marked periods of extreme paroxysm are observable in each
- century, one greater than the other—that of greatest number and
- intensity occurring about the middle of each century, the other towards
- the end of each.</p>
-
- <p>The form of the curves which Mallet has drawn seem to indicate that
- seismic energy came in sudden bursts, and then subsided, gradually
- gathering strength for another exhibition. This is continually seen
- in the shocks experienced in various seismic areas—a large shock, or
- the maximum of the activity dying out by repeated small shocks on
- succeeding days.</p>
-
- <p>Mr. I. Hattori, writing on the large earthquakes of Japan, remarks that
- on the average there has been one large earthquake every ten years.
- They, however, occur in groups, as shown in the following table.</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Earthquake intervals">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">No. of shocks</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">Period</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">Interval</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">6</td>
- <td class="pr0">A.D.</td>
- <td class="br">827–836</td>
- <td class="tdr pr0"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="br">years</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">6</td>
- <td class="pr0">„</td>
- <td class="br">880–890</td>
- <td class="tdr pr0">10<div>10</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">4</td>
- <td class="pr0">„</td>
- <td class="br">1040–1043</td>
- <td class="tdr pr0"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">5</td>
- <td class="pr0">„</td>
- <td class="br">1493–1507</td>
- <td class="tdr pr0"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">4</td>
- <td class="pr0">„</td>
- <td class="br">1510–1513</td>
- <td class="tdr pr0"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">5</td>
- <td class="pr0">„</td>
- <td class="br">1645–1650</td>
- <td class="tdr pr0"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">5</td>
- <td class="pr0">„</td>
- <td class="br">1662–1664</td>
- <td class="tdr pr0"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="bl br">4</td>
- <td class="pr0">„</td>
- <td class="br">1853–1856</td>
- <td class="tdr pr0"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="br">„</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>Dr. E. Naumann, who has also written on the earthquakes
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_245">245</span>quakes in Japan,
- remarks that if periods of seismic activity do not occur every 490
- years, there is a repetition of the cycle after 980 years, but there
- is much variability. A period of 68 years is very marked. On the
- average, large earthquakes have occurred every 5·9 years. Fuchs
- gives some interesting examples of the repetition of earthquakes at
- definite intervals, of which the following are examples. Sometimes
- earthquakes appear to have repeated themselves after 100 years. One
- remarkable example of this is that of Lima, on June 17, 1578, which was
- repeated on the same day in the year 1678. In Copiapo it is believed
- that earthquakes occur every twenty-three years, and examples of such
- repetitions are found in the years 1773, 1796, and 1819. In Canada,
- near to Quebec, earthquakes lasting forty days are said to occur every
- twenty-five years. The plateau of Ardebil is said to be regularly
- shaken by earthquakes every two years.</p>
-
- <p>A. Caldcleugh, writing on the earthquake of Chili, in 1835,<a id="FNanchor_96" href="#Footnote_96" class="fnanchor">[96]</a> remarks
- that the Spaniards first had the idea that a great earthquake occurs
- every century. Afterwards they thought the period was every fifty
- years. As a matter of fact, however, there were large earthquakes in
- 1812, at Caracas; in 1818, at Copiapo; in 1822, at Santiago; in 1827,
- at Bogota; in 1828, at Lima; in 1829, at Santiago; and in 1832, at
- Huasco.</p>
-
- <p>The average period of seismic disturbances in any country probably
- depends upon the subterranean volcanic activity of that country.
- When the activity is great the large earthquakes may occur at short
- intervals; but when the activity is small, as in England, shocks of
- moderate intensity may not be felt more than once or twice per century.
- A general idea of the relative frequency of the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_246">246</span>large earthquakes in
- various parts of the world may be easily obtained by an inspection of
- the table on page 240.</p>
-
- <p>Between the years 1850 and 1857 Kluge found that in the world there had
- been 4,620 earthquakes, which is, upon the average, nearly two per day.
- This estimate of the frequency of earthquakes of sufficient intensity
- to be recorded without the aid of instruments is, however, much below
- the truth. In Japan alone there probably occurs, as a daily average, a
- number at least equal to that which has been just given for the whole
- world. Boussingault considered that, in the Andes, earthquakes were
- occurring every instant of time.<a id="FNanchor_97" href="#Footnote_97" class="fnanchor">[97]</a></p>
-
- <p>To state definitely how many earthquakes are felt in the world on the
- average every day is, from the data which we have at our command, an
- impossibility. Perhaps there may be ten, perhaps there may be 100. The
- question is one which remains to be decided by statistics which have
- yet to be compiled.</p>
-
- <p>After a large earthquake, smaller shocks usually occur at short
- intervals. At first the succession of disturbances are separated from
- each other by perhaps only a few minutes or hours. Later on, the
- intensity of these shocks usually decreases, and the intervals between
- them become greater and greater, until, finally, after perhaps a few
- months, the seismic activity of the area assumes a quiescent state.</p>
-
- <p>The great earthquake which overtook Concepcion on February 20, 1835,
- was followed by a succession of shocks like those just referred to,
- there being registered, between the date of the destructive shock and
- March 4, 300 smaller disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>During the twenty-four hours succeeding the destruction of Lima
- (October 28, 1746), 200 shocks were <span class="pagenum" id="Page_247">247</span>
- counted, and up to the 24th of
- February in the following year 451 shocks were felt.</p>
-
- <p>At St. Thomas, in 1868, 283 shocks were counted in nine and a quarter
- hours.</p>
-
- <p>Similar examples might be taken from the description of almost
- all destructive earthquakes of which we have records. For a large
- earthquake to occur, and not to be accompanied by a train of succeeding
- earthquakes, is exceptional. Sometimes we find that a large number of
- small earthquakes have occurred without a large one being felt. Seismic
- storms of this description have happened, even in England—for instance,
- in the year 1750, which appears to have been a year of earthquakes for
- many portions of the globe.</p>
-
- <p>In this year, which is known as the ‘earthquake year,’ shocks were felt
- in England as follows: On March 14, in Surrey; March 18, in south-west
- of England; April 2, at Chester; June 7, at Norwich; August 23, in
- Lincolnshire; September 30, Northamptonshire.</p>
-
- <p><em>Synchronism of earthquakes.</em>—One of the first writers who drew
- attention to the fact that two shocks of earthquakes have been felt
- simultaneously at distant places was David Milne, who published a list
- of these occurrences.<a id="FNanchor_98" href="#Footnote_98" class="fnanchor">[98]</a></p>
-
- <p>In two instances, February and March 1750, shocks were simultaneously
- felt in England and Italy. In September 1833 shocks appear to have been
- simultaneously felt in England and Peru. These and many other similar
- examples are discussed by Mallet, who thinks with Milne that these
- coincidences are in every probability matters of accident. According to
- Fuchs, Calabria and Sicily appear often to have had earthquakes at the
- same time, as for instance in 1169, 1535, 1638,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_248">248</span>when the town Euphemia
- sank, and in the years 1770, 1776, 1780, and 1783.</p>
-
- <p>A remarkable example of coincidence occurred on November 16, 1827, when
- a terrible earthquake was felt in Columbia, and at the same time a
- shock occurred on the Ochotsk plains, nearly antipodal to each other.</p>
-
- <p>Kluge also gives a large number of instances of simultaneous
- earthquakes; thus, on January 23, 1855, on the same day that
- Wellington, New Zealand, so severely suffered, there was a heavy
- earthquake in the Siebengeberge, and also in North America. To this
- might be added the fact that the last destructive earthquake in Japan
- occurred within a few days of this time.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes neighbouring countries where earthquakes are common are
- equally remarkable by their utter want of synchronism. For example,
- Southern Italy and Syria are said never to be shaken simultaneously.</p>
-
- <p><em>Secondary earthquakes.</em>—Although it is possible that the simultaneous
- occurrence of earthquakes in distant regions may sometimes be a
- matter of chance, it must also be remarked that the shaking produced
- by one earthquake may be sufficient to cause ground which is in a
- critical state to give way, and thus the first disturbance becomes the
- originator of a second earthquake. Admitting that an earthquake, as
- it radiates from its centre, may act in such a manner, we see that a
- feeble disturbance might be the ultimate cause in the production of a
- destructive earthquake, just as the disturbance of a stone upon the
- face of a scarp might, by its impact upon other stones, cause many tons
- of material to be dislodged.</p>
-
- <p>It is also easy to conceive how the seismic activity of two districts
- may be dependent upon each other. Inasmuch as these secondary shocks
- are direct effects of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_249">249</span>
- primary disturbances, they might have been treated in a previous chapter.</p>
-
- <p>As examples of consequent or secondary earthquakes Fuchs tells us that
- when small earthquakes take place in Constantinople and Asia Minor,
- earthquakes are felt in Bukharest, Galazy, and Kronstadt.</p>
-
- <p>The great Lisbon earthquake also appears to have given rise to several
- consequent disturbances. One was in Derbyshire, occurring at 11 a.m.
- It was sufficiently violent to cause plaster to fall from the sides
- of a room and a chasm to open on the surface of the ground. Some
- miners working underground were so alarmed that they endeavoured to
- escape to the surface. During twenty minutes there were three distinct
- disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>Another shock was felt at Cork.<a id="FNanchor_99" href="#Footnote_99" class="fnanchor">[99]</a></p>
-
- <p>Although these disturbances own a consequence of the Lisbon earthquake
- they might properly perhaps be attributed to the pulsations produced by
- the shock at Lisbon, which spread through England and other countries
- without being felt.</p>
-
- <p>The shocks which men felt in New Zealand and New South Wales in 1868
- were probably secondary shocks, due to the disturbance at Arequipa and
- other places on the South American coast.</p>
-
- <p>These so-called secondary earthquakes, although in many instances
- they may be due to earth pulsations produced by earthquake, or to the
- immediate sensible shaking of a large earthquake, may perhaps, in
- certain instances, be attributed to some widespread disturbance beneath
- the crust of the earth. The occurrence of periods where all earthquake
- countries suffer, unusual disturbances indicate the probability of such
- underground phenomena.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XIV">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_250">250</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XIV.<br />
- <span class="subhead">DISTRIBUTION OF EARTHQUAKES IN TIME (<i>continued</i>).</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- The occurrence of earthquakes in relation to the position of the
- heavenly bodies—Earthquakes and the moon—Earthquakes and the sun;
- and the seasons; the months—Planets and meteors—Hours at which
- earthquakes are frequent—Earthquakes and sun spots—Earthquakes
- and the aurora.</div>
-
- <p><em>The position of the heavenly bodies and the occurrence of
- earthquakes.</em>—Since the earliest times, in searching for the cause of
- various natural phenomena, man has turned his energies towards the
- heavens. One of the earliest observations was the connection that
- exists between the season of the year and the motions of the heavenly
- bodies. Tides were seen to be influenced by the moon. In later times
- it has been discovered that periods of maximum magnetic disturbances
- occur every ten or eleven years with the sun spots, and Herr Kreil, of
- Vienna, tells us our satellite, the moon, has also an influence upon
- the magnet.</p>
-
- <p>From day to day we see the bond connecting our planet with the sun, the
- moon, and other heavenly bodies which are outside us gradually becoming
- closer.</p>
-
- <p>Inasmuch as many phenomena, like the motion of the tides, the rise and
- fall of the barometer, fluctuations in temperature, are all more or
- less directly connected with the relative position of our planet with
- regard to the sun<span class="pagenum" id="Page_251">251</span>
- and moon, any coincidence between the phases of
- these bodies and the occurrence of earthquakes more or less involves a
- time relationship with the other phenomena resultant on lunar and solar
- influences.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquakes and the position of the moon.</em>—Many earthquake
- investigators have attempted to show the connection between earthquakes
- and the phases of the moon.</p>
-
- <p>The first and most successful worker in this branch of seismology was
- Professor Alexis Perrey, of Dijon, who, after many years of arduous
- labour in tabulating and examining catalogues of earthquakes, showed
- that earthquakes were more likely to occur at the following periods
- than at others.</p>
-
- <p>1. They are more frequent at new or full moon (syzygies) than at half
- moon (quadratures).</p>
-
- <p>2. They are more frequent when the moon is nearest the earth (perigee)
- than when she is farthest off (apogee).</p>
-
- <p>3. They are more frequent when the moon is on the meridian than when
- she is on the horizon.</p>
-
- <p>These results were obtained by Perrey after analysing his catalogues
- by three different and independent methods, and they were confirmed
- by the report of a committee appointed by the Academy of Sciences. It
- must, however, be remarked that in several instances anomalies occur,
- and also that the difference between the number of earthquakes at any
- two periods is not a very large one. Thus, for instance, the annual
- catalogues compiled by Perrey from 1844 to 1847, the earthquakes in
- perigee are to those in apogee as 47 : 39. Between the years 1843 and
- 1872 Perrey finds that 3,290 shocks occurred at the moon’s perigee, and
- 3,015 at the apogee.<a id="FNanchor_100" href="#Footnote_100" class="fnanchor">[100]</a></p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_252">252</span></p>
-
- <p>Between 1761 and 1800 earthquakes occurred as follows:—</p>
-
- <table summary="Earthquakes per distance of moon">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">In Perigee</td>
- <td>526</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">Apogee</td>
- <td>465</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>The following table shows the results which enabled Perrey to deduce
- his first law.</p>
-
- <p>Dividing the period of lunation into quarters, with the time of
- syzygies and quadratures as the centres of these quarters, he found
- that the earthquakes were distributed as follows.</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Earthquakes per phase of moon">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="ball">Totals</th>
- <th class="ball">Syzygies</th>
- <th class="ball">Quadratures</th>
- <th class="ball">Difference<br />in favour of<br />the Syzygies</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">1843–1847</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,604</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>850·48</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>753·52</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>69·96</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">1848–1852</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2,049</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,053·53</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>995·47</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>58·06</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">1853–1857</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3,018</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,534·13</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,483·87</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>50·26</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">1858–1862</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>3,140</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,602·99 </div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,537·41</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>65·98</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">1863–1867</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2,845</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,463·42</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>1,381·58</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>81·84</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">1868–1872</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>4,593</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2,333·48</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>2,259·52</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>73·96</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="bl br">1843–1872</td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>17,249</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8,838·03</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>8,410·97</div></td>
- <td class="tdr br"><div>427·06</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>The reported earthquakes between 1751 and 1843 are shown to conform
- with the same rule.<a id="FNanchor_101" href="#Footnote_101" class="fnanchor">[101]</a> Julius Schmidt, astronomer at Athens, found
- for the earthquakes of Eastern Europe and adjacent countries for the
- years 1776 to 1873 that there were more earthquakes when the moon was
- in perigee. Other maxima were at new moon, and two days after the first
- quarter. There was a diminution at full moon, and a minimum on the day
- of the last quarter. As one example of results which are antagonistic
- to the general results obtained by Perrey may be quoted the results of
- an examination by Professor W. S. Chaplin of the earthquake recorded at
- the meteorological observatory in Tokio. The list of earthquakes, 143
- in number, extending over a period of three years, was recorded by one
- of Palmieri’s instruments. The results were as follows:—</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_253">253</span></p>
-
- <p>1. There have been maxima of earthquakes when the moon was two and
- nine hours east and seven hours west. At the upper transit there is a
- minimum.</p>
-
- <p>2. Considering the moon’s position with regard to the sun, at
- conjunction there were 32, at opposition 37, and at quadrature 74. East
- of the meridian the maximum was at least four hours.</p>
-
- <p>3. When the moon was north of the equator these were 68, when south 82.</p>
-
- <p>4. A maximum of earthquakes seven and eleven days after the moon’s
- perigee. The fact that these results were obtained for the earthquakes
- of a special small seismic area renders them more interesting.<a id="FNanchor_102" href="#Footnote_102" class="fnanchor">[102]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Frequency of earthquakes in relation to the position of the sun.</em>—The
- question as to whether there is a connection between the frequency of
- earthquakes and the relative position of the sun is to a great extent
- identical with the question as to the relative frequency of earthquakes
- in the various seasons. It is a subject which we find referred to
- by writers in the earliest ages. Pliny and Aristotle thought that
- earthquakes occurred chiefly in spring and autumn. In later times it
- has been a subject which has been most carefully considered by Merian,
- von Hoff, Perrey, Mallet, Volger, Kluge, and others who have devoted
- attention to seismology. In a résumé of the earthquakes of Europe, and
- of the adjacent parts of Asia and Africa, from <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 306–1843,
- Mallet gives the following results:—</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Earthquakes in relation to sun">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th colspan="4" class="ball">For Nineteenth Century</th>
- <th colspan="4" class="ball">For the whole period</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Winter Solstice</td>
- <td class="">177</td>
- <td rowspan="3" class="pl0 pr0"><span class="x300a">}</span></td>
- <td colspan="2" class="tdl br">Solstices</td>
- <td class="">253</td>
- <td rowspan="3" class="pl0 pr0"><span class="x300a">}</span></td>
- <td colspan="2" class="tdl br">Solstices</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Spring Equinox</td>
- <td class="">151</td>
- <td rowspan="3" class="pl0 pr0 bb"><span class="x300a">}</span></td>
- <td class="br">306</td>
- <td class="">170</td>
- <td rowspan="3" class="pl0 pr0 bb"><span class="x300a">}</span></td>
- <td class="br">403</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Summer Solstice</td>
- <td class="">129</td>
- <td class="br">Equinoxes</td>
- <td class="">150</td>
- <td class="br">Equinoxes</td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl bl br">Autumnal Equinox</td>
- <td class="">164</td>
- <td class="">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">315</td>
- <td class="">159</td>
- <td class="">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">329</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_254">254</span></p>
-
- <p>The above periods were called by Perrey <em>critical epochs</em>, because
- as a general result of his researches he found that at such periods
- there was a greater frequency of earthquakes. Fuchs, quoting from
- Kluge’s tables, extending from 1850–1857, tells us that the recorded
- earthquakes occurred as follows:—</p>
-
- <p>
- In the Northern Hemisphere—
- </p>
- <table summary="Earthquakes in relation to sun north">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">Equinoxes</td>
- <td><b>1324</b></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">Solstices</td>
- <td>1202</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>
- In the Southern Hemisphere—
- </p>
- <table summary="Earthquakes in relation to sun south">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">Equinoxes</td>
- <td><b>301</b></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">Solstices</td>
- <td>261</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>Earthquakes are, therefore, more frequent at the equinoxes, and this
- especially at the autumnal equinox. In the northern hemisphere, at
- the solstices, the greater number of shocks occur about the winter
- solstices, whilst in the southern hemisphere, about the summer
- solstices.</p>
-
- <p>Exceptions, however, are found in Central America and the West Indies,
- in the Caucasus, and the Ægean Sea.</p>
-
- <p>The idea that earthquakes had a periodicity dependent upon the position
- of the heavenly bodies is by no means confined to Europe. In a Japanese
- work called ‘Jishin Setsu’ (an opinion about earthquakes) by a priest
- called Tensho, it is stated that the relative positions and movements
- of the twenty-eight constellations with respect to the moon cause
- earthquakes. This Tensho asserts after careful calculation, and Falb
- tells us that all future earthquakes can be predicted.</p>
-
- <p>In the Kuriles and Kamschatka, Sicily, and in parts of South America,
- it is said that the equinoxes are regarded as dangerous seasons.</p>
-
- <p><em>Frequency of earthquakes in relation to the seasons and months.</em>—What
- is here said respecting the relative<span class="pagenum" id="Page_255">255</span>
- frequency of earthquakes at the
- different seasons and months is little more than an extension and
- critical examination of the results which have been given respecting
- the frequency of earthquakes in regard to the position of the sun.</p>
-
- <p>That there is a difference between the number of earthquakes which are
- felt at one season of the year as compared with those felt at another
- is a fact which, as seismoscopic observations are extended, is becoming
- more and more recognised.</p>
-
- <p>Some of the more important results which were arrived at by Mallet from
- 5,879 observations made in the northern hemisphere, and 223 in the
- southern hemisphere, may be expressed as follows:—</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Earthquakes in relation to sun, hemispheres">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="ball">Maxima</th>
- <th class="ball">Minima</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl vatop bl br">Northern Hemisphere</td>
- <td class="tdl vatop br">January, also a slight rise in August and October</td>
- <td class="tdl vatop br">May, June, and July</td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl vatop bl br">Southern Hemisphere</td>
- <td class="tdl vatop br">November, also May and June</td>
- <td class="tdl vatop br">March, extending over one month, also August</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>Julius Schmidt, of Athens, who so carefully examined the earthquakes of
- eastern Europe, came to the following conclusions:—</p>
-
- <p>For the earthquakes between 1200 and 1873, a maximum on September 26
- and January 17; a minimum on December 3 and June 13.</p>
-
- <p>For the earthquakes between 1873 and 1874, a maximum on March 1 and
- October 1; a minimum on July 7 and December 15.</p>
-
- <p>For all the earthquakes of eastern Europe, a maximum on January 3; a
- minimum on July 8, or there was a maximum at perihelion and aphelion.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_256">256</span></p>
-
- <p>When the months are grouped together according to the seasons, spring,
- summer, autumn, and winter, we find that in the northern hemisphere the
- minimum is in summer and the maximum in winter, whilst in the southern
- hemisphere (giving the proper months corresponding to its seasons) we
- find two maxima, one at the commencement of winter, and the other at
- midsummer, whilst the minima are in spring and autumn.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p256.jpg" width="541" height="454" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 36.</span>—Curves of Monthly Seismic Intensity
- (Mallet).</div>
- </div>
-
- <p>In the following table the difference in the number of earthquakes felt
- at different seasons is given more in detail.</p>
-
- <p>In examining this table, we must remember that for countries like Peru,
- Chili, and New Zealand, lying in the southern hemisphere, the records
- given for the months April to September correspond to the winter months
- of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_257">257</span> those countries.
- The Roman numerals indicate the centuries between which the records date.</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Earthquakes in relation to season">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="ball">October to March</th>
- <th class="ball">April to September</th>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td rowspan="14" class="bl br">Northern Regions</td>
- <td class="tdrt"><div>1.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Scandinavia and Iceland, xii–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>129</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>91</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>2.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">British and Northern Isles, xi–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>123</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>94</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>3.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Belgium, France, and Holland, iv–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>395</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>272</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>4.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Rhone Basin, xvi–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>115</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>69</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>5.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Switzerland and Rhine Basin, ix–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>327</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>205</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>6.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Danube Basin, v–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>147</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>128</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>7.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Spanish Peninsula, xi–xiv</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>114</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>87</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>8.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Italy, Sicily, Sardinia, and Malta, iv–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>650</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>581</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>9.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Turco-Hellenic Territory, Syria, Ægean Isles, and Levant, iv–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>214</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>222</b></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>10.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Northern Zone of Asia, xviii–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>46</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>36</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>11.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Japan (Tokio area), 1872–1880 (small earthquakes)</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>213</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>157</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>12.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Japan <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 295-<span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 1872 (large earthquakes)</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>165</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>188</b></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>13.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Algeria and Northern Africa</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>26</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>20</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>14.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">United States and Canada, xvii–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>86</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>48</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td rowspan="5" class="bl br">Central Regions</td>
- <td class="tdrt"><div>15.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Java, Sumatra, and neighbouring Islands, 1873–4–7–8</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>194</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>182</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>16.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Mexico and Central America, xvi–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>26</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>26</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>17.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">West Indies (Mallet), xvi–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>108</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>114</b></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>18.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">West Indies, xvi–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>296</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>343</b></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>19.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Cuba, xvi–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>28</b></div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>23</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td rowspan="5" class="bl br bb">Southern Regions</td>
- <td class="tdrt"><div>20.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Chili, and La Plata Basin, xvi–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>89</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>89</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>21.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">Peru, Columbia, Basin of Amazons, xvi–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>506</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>541</b></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdrt"><div>22.</div></td>
- <td class="tdl br">New Zealand, 1869–1879</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>166</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div><b>176</b></div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>Neglecting those records which show as many earthquakes for the winter
- months as for the summer months, we see at a glance that generally
- the greater number of shocks have happened during the colder seasons.
- In the southern hemisphere, so far as the records go, this is not
- true. In the northern regions, out of fourteen examples there are
- two exceptions. In the central regions there are two cases where the
- greatest number of earthquakes have been recorded in the winter months,
- and two cases<span class="pagenum" id="Page_258">258</span>
- where the greatest number have been recorded for the summer.</p>
-
- <p>Altogether, out of twenty-two examples, there are only six exceptions
- to the rule. These exceptions altogether occur among records many of
- which are ancient, and are, therefore, more open to error than lists
- which have been compiled in modern times.</p>
-
- <p>Because small earthquakes are seldom noticed by persons out in the
- open air, it might be expected that the number of earthquakes observed
- in warm countries at one portion of the year would be equal to those
- observed in any other season. Such an argument, however, would hardly
- apply to most of the records which are quoted, as they refer to
- destructive disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>If, however, we take the records made in tropical countries from the
- table just given, we see that in such countries there have been almost
- as many observations of earthquakes at one season as at any other.</p>
-
- <p>Another fact which might be adduced against the rule that the
- greater number of earthquakes occur during the winter months would
- be the comparison of a table of earthquakes recorded previous to the
- nineteenth century. By doing this we see that for certain countries the
- winter rule is inverted, and that the greater number of shocks are felt
- during the summer.</p>
-
- <p>Notwithstanding these objections to Perrey’s conclusions, the balance
- of evidence is in favour of his general result, and we may conclude
- that during the colder portions of the year we may expect more shakings
- than during the warmer portions. Comparing the number of earthquakes of
- winter and autumn to those of summer and spring, they are to each other
- in the proportion of 4 : 3.</p>
-
- <p>A fairer way to examine this question, and to determine what is
- probably the present state of seismic activity in our globe, would
- be only to consider the earthquakes
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_259">259</span> which have taken place in
- comparatively recent times, laying especial stress upon those
- observations which have been made with the assistance of automatic
- instruments, or those which have been collected by persons interested
- in these investigations.</p>
-
- <p>For this purpose the following table, showing the distribution of
- earthquakes in different countries during the nineteenth century, has
- been compiled.</p>
-
- <p>The arrangement is mensual. Where the number of earthquakes in any
- month is above the average, the number is printed in large type; where
- below the average, in small type.</p>
-
-
- <p class="center"><span class="smcap">Earthquakes of the Nineteenth Century, chiefly from Perrey.</span></p>
-
- <div class="left hang2">Key:</div>
-
- <table class="ml5 mb2 lh1" summary="Earthquakes by country and month key">
- <tr><td>Jan</td> <td>January</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Feb</td> <td>February</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Mar</td> <td>March</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Apr</td> <td>April</td></tr>
- <tr><td>May</td> <td>May</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Jun</td> <td>June</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Jul</td> <td>July</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Aug</td> <td>August</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Sep</td> <td>September</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Oct</td> <td>October</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Nov</td> <td>November</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Dec</td> <td>December</td></tr>
- <tr><td>Ave</td> <td>Average per month</td></tr>
- </table>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Earthquakes by country and month">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="ball">Jan</th>
- <th class="ball">Feb</th>
- <th class="ball">Mar</th>
- <th class="ball">Apr</th>
- <th class="ball">May</th>
- <th class="ball">Jun</th>
- <th class="ball">Jul</th>
- <th class="ball">Aug</th>
- <th class="ball">Sep</th>
- <th class="ball">Oct</th>
- <th class="ball">Nov</th>
- <th class="ball">Dec</th>
- <th class="ball">Ave</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Scandinavia and Iceland</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">17</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>9·3</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">British Isles and Northern Isles</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>7</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>9<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">France, Belgium, Holland</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">27</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">17</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">21</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">17</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">17</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">21</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">25</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>17<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Basin of the Rhone</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">14</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>6·6</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Basin of the Rhine and Switzerland</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">15</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">17</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>13</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">17</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">24</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">25</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>14<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Basin of the Danube</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">14</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">15</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">16</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">16</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>11·8</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Spanish Peninsula</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">7</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">7</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>7<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Italian Peninsula, Sicily, Sardinia, and Malta</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">44</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">44</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">48</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">43</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">40</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>34</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">41</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">46</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">45</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>26</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">39</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>39<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Turco-Hellenic Territory, Syria, Ægean Islands, and Levant</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">22</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">20</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>16</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>15</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">22</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">17</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>14</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>16<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Northern Zone of Asia</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">7</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>4·7</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">1876–1881, Japan (Tokio area)</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">39</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">41</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">41</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">33</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>21</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>28</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">34</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">43</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>31·4</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Japan (large earthquakes)</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Algeria and North’rn Africa</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">7</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3·8</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">United States and Canada</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">7</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3·8</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Java, Sumatra, &amp;c., 1873–4–5–7 and 9</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">35</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">38</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>33</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>22</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">36</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">40</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>24</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">35</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>30</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>26</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>31<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Mexico and Central America</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2·5</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Antilles</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">19</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">16</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">13</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">12</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>11·8</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Cuba</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">5</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">6</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">4</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>4<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Chili and La Plata</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">14</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>10</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">14</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">19</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>11</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">16</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">15</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">16</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>9</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">27</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>8</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>13·9</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Peru, Columbia, Basins of Amazons, xvi–xix</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">92</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>83</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">92</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">106</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>79</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">94</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">93</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">97</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>77</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>72</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">90</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>87<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">New Zealand, 1869–79</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">31</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">37</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>23</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>22</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">31</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">36</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">37</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>21</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>27</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>23</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>28·5</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc bl br">Jan. 1850, Dec. 1857</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Northern Hemisphere</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">153</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">162</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>143</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">161</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>126</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>124</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>141</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">156</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">154</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">171</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">151</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">168</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>150<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Southern Hemisphere</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">72</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>43</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">61</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">66</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>46</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>42</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">53</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>39</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">54</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">55</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">57</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>46</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>53<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc bl br">1821–1830</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="br">&nbsp;</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl bl br">Northern Hemisphere</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">31</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">36</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">31</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>29</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">33</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">33</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>20</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">31</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>24</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">41</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>26</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">34</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>30<span class="s">·0</span></div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="tdl bl br">Southern Hemisphere</td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>&mdash;</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">3</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div class="large">2</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1</div></td>
- <td class="tdrb br"><div>1·6</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_260">260</span></p>
-
- <p>A glance at this table shows that for most countries in the northern
- hemisphere the rule that there are generally more earthquakes during
- the winter months—that is, from October to March—holds good. For
- countries which lie comparatively near to the Equator, and also for
- those countries in the southern hemisphere, the rule is not so clear.
- When examining this table it must be remembered that it does not enable
- us to judge of the relative frequency of earthquakes in different
- countries, inasmuch as the periods over which the records were taken
- are different in different cases.</p>
-
- <p>To the above table might be added the records of P. Merian, who
- examined the earthquakes felt in Basle up to 1831. As a result he
- found that during the winter months eighty shocks had been felt,
- whilst during the summer only forty. Taking the records for the two
- hemispheres from 1850–1857, compiled by Kluge,<a id="FNanchor_103" href="#Footnote_103" class="fnanchor">[103]</a> in the northern
- hemisphere we have in the months between October and March 948 shocks
- against 862 in the remainder of the year. In the same months in the
- southern hemisphere we have for the corresponding periods the numbers
- 337 and 300, and thus both hemispheres would appear to follow the same
- rule. If, however, we examine the table we see that the two seasons
- are not so pronounced for the southern hemisphere as they are for
- the northern, and that there may be two or three periods of maximum
- disturbance as has been previously indicated.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquakes and the planets and meteors.</em>—Just as the moon and the sun
- may exert an attractive influence upon the earth and cause earthquakes
- to predominate at certain seasons rather than at others, several
- investigators of seismic phenomena have thought that the planets might
- act in a similar manner.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_261">261</span></p>
-
- <p>M. J. Delauney, from a study of Perrey’s tables of earthquakes from
- 1750–1842, found two groups of maxima each with a period of about
- twelve years, one commencing in 1759 and the other in 1756. Two
- other groups with twenty-eight year periods respectively commence in
- 1756 and 1773. These groups coincide with the times when Jupiter and
- Saturn reach the mean longitudes of 265° and 135°. From this Delauney
- concludes that earthquakes have a maximum when the planets are in the
- mean longitudes just mentioned.</p>
-
- <p>The increased number of earthquakes, especially in November, are
- attributed to the passage of the earth through swarms of meteors, and
- in like manner supposes the influence of Jupiter and Saturn to be due
- to their passing through meteor streams situated in mean longitudes
- 135° and 265°.</p>
-
- <p>As a consequence of this he predicts an increase of earthquakes in the
- years 1886, 1891, 1898, 1900, &amp;c.<a id="FNanchor_104" href="#Footnote_104" class="fnanchor">[104]</a></p>
-
- <p>Dr. E. Naumann, who critically examined the large earthquakes of Japan,
- showed that there was an approximate coincidence between many of the
- disturbances and the thirty-three year period of meteoric showers.<a id="FNanchor_105" href="#Footnote_105" class="fnanchor">[105]</a></p>
-
- <p>Humboldt states that a great shower of meteors was seen at Quito before
- the great earthquake of Riobamba (Feb. 4, 1797). The earthquakes of
- 1766 and 1799 at Cumana are also said to have been accompanied with
- meteoric showers. Mallet gives a list of large earthquakes which
- occurred at the times when meteors were observed.<a id="FNanchor_106" href="#Footnote_106" class="fnanchor">[106]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>The hours at which earthquakes are most frequent.</em>—From the
- examination of a catalogue of over 2,000 earthquakes
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_262">262</span> which occurred
- in various parts of the world between the years 1850 and 1857, made by
- Kluge, it is found that both for the northern and southern hemispheres
- the observations which were made during the night generally exceed
- those which were made during the day.</p>
-
- <table class="collapse" summary="Day vs. night earthquakes">
- <tr>
- <th class="ball">&nbsp;</th>
- <th colspan="2" class="ball">Number of Earthquakes</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <th class="bl br">&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="br">Day</th>
- <th class="br">Night</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="bl br">In the Northern Hemisphere</td>
- <td class="br">938</td>
- <td class="br">1592</td>
- </tr>
- <tr class="bb">
- <td class="bl br">In the Southern Hemisphere</td>
- <td class="br">292</td>
- <td class="br">357</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p class="noindent">In the northern hemisphere the greatest number were observed between 10
- <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> and 12 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> (360 shocks), and the fewest between
- 12 and 2 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> (139 shocks). In the southern hemisphere, the
- greatest number were observed at night between 12 and 1, and the
- smallest number between 1 and 2 and 4 and 5 in the afternoon.<a id="FNanchor_107" href="#Footnote_107" class="fnanchor">[107]</a>
- These distinctions, however, are less distinctly marked as we approach
- the Equator. Schmidt found for the earthquakes of the Orient between
- 1774 and 1873, that shocks had been most frequent about half-past two
- <span class="smcap">a.m.</span>, and less frequent about 1 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> With regard
- to these conclusions, which have been reached with much labour, we
- might be inclined to think that they are partially to be explained on
- the supposition that more observations are made during the night than
- during the day—the personal experience of residents in an earthquake
- country being, that many earthquakes which occur during the day are
- passed by unnoticed, whilst those which occur during the night are
- recorded by thousands of observers. Such a view is certainly confirmed
- by the instrumental records obtained in Japan. From 1872 to 1880
- inclusive there were 261 shocks recorded, 132 of which occurred between
- the hours of 6 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> and 6 <span class="smcap">a.m.</span>
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_263">263</span></p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquakes and sun spots.</em>—Of late years considerable attention
- has been drawn to a coincidence between the occurrence of sun spots,
- magnetic disturbances, rainfall, and other natural phenomena.</p>
-
- <p>These periods of sun spots occur about every eleven years, and appear
- to be coincident with the periodical return of the planet Jupiter. In
- Japan, Dr. E. Naumann sought for a coincidence between these periods of
- sun spots and earthquakes, but without any marked results.</p>
-
- <p>Schmidt, who carefully compared his lists of earthquakes with the
- appearance of sun spots, came to the conclusion that there was no
- marked coincidence. The occurrence of earthquakes had sometimes
- synchronised with sun spots, whilst at other times there had been a
- maximum of sun spots and no earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>M. R. Wolf<a id="FNanchor_108" href="#Footnote_108" class="fnanchor">[108]</a> apparently considers that earthquakes, like volcanic
- eruptions and the appearance of the aurora, are coincident with sun
- spots.</p>
-
- <p>Kluge, however, came to the conclusion that when there are few sun
- spots, earthquakes, like volcanic eruptions and magnetic disturbances,
- have been at a maximum.</p>
-
- <p>M. A. Poey, who examined a catalogue of the earthquakes of Mexico
- and the Antilles, extending from 1634 to 1870, shows by a table that
- earthquakes have come in groups, first at the maxima and then at the
- minima period of sun spots. Out of thirty-eight groups, seventeen
- being at the maximum and seventeen at the minimum, the remaining four
- are exceptions to the rule, being between the maximum and minimum.
- Phenomena which are dependent upon heat occur with the minima of sun
- spots, and those dependent upon cold with the maxima.<a id="FNanchor_109" href="#Footnote_109" class="fnanchor">[109]</a></p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_264">264</span></p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquakes and the aurora.</em>—The possible connection between
- earthquakes and the aurora is a subject which has attracted some
- attention. Boué has especially made a careful examination of this
- subject.<a id="FNanchor_110" href="#Footnote_110" class="fnanchor">[110]</a></p>
-
- <p>He comes to the conclusion that if we compare the monthly periods of
- earthquake frequency and the aurora there is an agreement between
- the two. Comparing Perrey’s tables of earthquakes from the fourth to
- the nineteenth century, with tables of the aurora, one-third of both
- phenomena have occurred, not only in the same day, but often at the
- same hour. Between 1834 and 1847, 457 earthquakes are given and 351
- notices of the aurora.</p>
-
- <p class="mb0">Out of these:—</p>
-
- <div class="left ml5">
- 48 occur on the same day,<br />
- &nbsp; 5 occur in the same hour,<br />
- 30 approximate to the same time.
- </div>
-
- <p>The nearer together that these phenomena have occurred the stronger
- have they been.</p>
-
- <p>Professor M. S. di Rossi brings forward many examples where there
- has been a coincidence between the appearance of the aurora and
- earthquakes. On 139 nights out of 211 days the aurora was seen in
- some parts of Italy, and ninety-three times earthquakes were felt. On
- forty-six occasions earthquakes and aurora took place together.<a id="FNanchor_111" href="#Footnote_111" class="fnanchor">[111]</a> In
- considering the probability of a connection existing between these two
- phenomena, we must bear in mind that the aurora is at no great height
- above the surface of our earth, and, further, that it can be partially
- imitated. The fact that in earthquake countries, like Japan, the aurora
- is practically never seen, would indicate that
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_265">265</span>we can neither regard
- this imperfectly understood phenomenon either as an effect or cause
- of earthquakes. That earthquakes and the appearance of the aurora in
- certain countries should not sometimes coincide is an impossibility.</p>
-
- <p>Dr. Stukeley, who, it must be remembered, attempted to correlate
- the phenomena of earthquakes and electricity, when writing of the
- disturbances which shook England in 1849 and 1850, says that the
- weather had been unusually warm, the aurora borealis frequent and of
- unusually bright colours, whilst the whole year was remarkable for its
- fire-balls, lightnings, and corruscations.<a id="FNanchor_112" href="#Footnote_112" class="fnanchor">[112]</a></p>
-
- <p>The aurora was observed before the commencement of the Maestricht
- earthquakes in 1751<a id="FNanchor_113" href="#Footnote_113" class="fnanchor">[113]</a> whilst at the time of the shock flashes of
- light like lightning were observed in the sky.</p>
-
- <p>Glimmering lights were seen in the sky before the New England
- earthquakes (Nov. 18, 1755), and again, before the disturbances which
- occurred in the same region in 1727, peculiar flashes of light were
- seen.</p>
-
- <p>Preceding the Sicilian earthquake of 1692 strange lights were seen
- in the sky. Ignis fatui have also been observed with earthquakes. At
- the time of auroral displays Bertelli has observed microseismical
- disturbances, and M. S. di Rossi, who has made similar observations,
- thinks that there is an intimate connection between the aurora and
- earthquakes; the aurora either occurring in a period of earthquakes, or
- else taking the place of earthquakes.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XV">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_266">266</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XV.<br />
- <span class="subhead">BAROMETRICAL FLUCTUATIONS AND EARTHQUAKES—FLUCTUATIONS IN TEMPERATURE
- AND EARTHQUAKES.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <p><em>Changes in the barometer and earthquakes.</em>—Mallet, who collected
- together a number of examples of earthquakes which have occurred with
- a fall of the barometer, and a number which have happened with a rise,
- concludes that there are as many instances of the one as of the other.
- At the great earthquake of Calabria, in 1783, the barometer was very
- low. The earthquake of the Rhine (February 23, 1828) was preceded by
- a gradual fall of the barometer, which reached its lowest point upon
- that day. After the earthquake the barometer again rose. The earthquake
- of February 22, 1880, in Japan, was accompanied by exactly similar
- phenomena. Caldcleugh, who observed the heavy shocks in Chili (February
- 20, 1835), noticed that on February 17 and 18 the barometer fell 5/10
- inches. Similar phenomena were observed before the succeeding smaller
- shocks. After the shocks the barometer again rose. Principal Dawson,
- speaking of the earthquakes of Canada, observes that some of the shocks
- have been accompanied with a low barometer.</p>
-
- <p>P. Merian, who examined the connection between the Swiss earthquakes
- and atmospheric pressure, found that out of twenty-two earthquakes
- observed in Basle between<span class="pagenum" id="Page_267">267</span>
- 1755 and 1836, thirteen of these were
- local shocks, of which eight were accompanied with sudden changes of
- pressure. Of the remaining nine, which were only felt slightly in
- Basle, no change in atmospheric pressure was observed. Of thirty-six
- earthquakes which, between 1826 and 1836, were felt in Switzerland,
- thirty were chiefly confined to Switzerland, and ten of these occurred
- with a low or falling barometer.</p>
-
- <p>Humboldt is of opinion that earthquakes only occur with changes in
- barometric pressure in those countries where earthquakes are few; and
- he gives examples where the regular variations of the barometer have
- gone on without interruption at the time of earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>Frederick Hoffmann, who examined fifty-seven earthquakes which occurred
- at Palermo between 1788 and 1838, came to the following result:—</p>
-
- <table summary="Palermo barometer readings">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">The barometer was sinking</td>
- <td class="tdl">in 20 cases</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; rising</td>
- <td class="tdl">in 16&nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; at a minimum</td>
- <td class="tdl">in&nbsp; &nbsp;7&nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; maximum</td>
- <td class="tdl">in&nbsp; &nbsp;3&nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; undetermined</td>
- <td class="tdl">in 11&nbsp; &nbsp; „<a id="FNanchor_114" href="#Footnote_114" class="fnanchor">[114]</a></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>The observations of M. S. di Rossi apparently show that the earthquakes
- in Italy chiefly occur with a barometrical depression and with sudden
- jumps in atmospheric pressure.</p>
-
- <p>Schmidt, who examined the earthquakes of the Orient, which occurred
- between 1858 and 1873, says that they were rare with a high barometer,
- but numerous when the barometer was low.</p>
-
- <p>From an examination of a table of 396 earthquakes (May 8, 1875-Dec.
- 1881) felt in Tokio, furnished to me by Mr. Arai Ikunosuke, the
- director of the meteorological department, I obtained the following
- results:—</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_268">268</span></p>
-
- <table summary="Tokio barometer readings">
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">The barometer was rising</td>
- <td class="tdl">in 169 cases</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; falling</td>
- <td class="tdl">in 154&nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; steady</td>
- <td class="tdl">in&nbsp; &nbsp;73&nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; below the monthly mean</td>
- <td class="tdl">in 189&nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; above</td>
- <td class="tdl">in 192&nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>From this it would appear that in Japan at least the movements of the
- barometer do not show any marked connection with the occurrence of
- earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>When considering this question we must remember the marked effects
- which a lowering of the barometer produces upon certain volcanoes and
- solfataras. The volumes of steam emitted from Stromboli and from some
- of the solfataras in Tuscany hold a marked connection with atmospheric
- pressure as the quantity of fire damp given off from coal seams—these
- being greatest when the barometer is low. At certain changes of
- the weather it is said that the volcano of Vulture, near Melfi,
- emits noises. These phenomena at once place volcanic phenomena and
- barometrical pressure in direct relationship.</p>
-
- <p><em>Changes in temperature.</em>—If, with an earthquake, it should happen
- that there is a change in the height of the barometer, we should
- naturally expect that this might be accompanied with the changes in the
- temperature, in the wind, and in other atmospheric phenomena which are
- more or less connected with the height of the barometer.</p>
-
- <p>Many times it has been observed that after an earthquake there has been
- a sudden fall in the temperature. Such was the case with the Yokohama
- earthquakes of 1880.</p>
-
- <p>Cotte endeavours to show that the earthquakes of Lisbon produced a
- change upon the temperature of all Europe. In the year which followed
- this earthquake storms were more common than usual.</p>
-
- <p>Kluge has collected together a large number of
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_269">269</span> examples when there has
- been a fall of temperature at the time of an earthquake.<a id="FNanchor_115" href="#Footnote_115" class="fnanchor">[115]</a></p>
-
- <p>At Kiachta, in Siberia, at the time of the earthquake of December
- 27, 1856, the thermometer fell from 12° to 25° R. We must, however,
- remember that there are many cases known where the thermometer rose.</p>
-
- <p>M. S. di Rossi remarks that we have the highest records of temperature
- in the years richest in earthquakes. Thus, in 1873, at the time of the
- earthquakes in Central and Northern Italy, an abnormal high temperature
- was remarked. Japanese writers have remarked upon the unusual heat
- which has shaken their countries. The temperature of subterranean
- waters have been known to increase before earthquakes.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XVI">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_270">270</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XVI.<br />
- <span class="subhead">RELATION OF SEISMIC TO VOLCANIC PHENOMENA.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Want of synchronism between earthquakes and volcanic
- eruptions—Synchronism between earthquakes and volcanic
- eruptions—Conclusion.</div>
-
- <p><em>Connection between earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.</em>—Insomuch as
- it is a recognised fact that regions which are characterised by their
- seismic activity are chiefly those which are also characterised by
- the number of their volcanoes, it is generally assumed that these
- two phenomena have an intimate relation. The residents in a volcanic
- country, when seeking for the origin of an earthquake, invariably turn
- towards the volcanoes which surround them. If a neighbouring volcano
- is in a state of activity, it is often regarded as a safeguard against
- seismic convulsions, in other cases it is looked upon as being the
- cause of such disturbances. In certain instances both of these views
- have apparently been corroborated. When we consider that an earthquake
- and a volcanic eruption may both be the result of some great internal
- convulsion, and that first one and then the other may take place in the
- same neighbourhood, it is natural to expect that when these internal
- forces have expended themselves in the production of one of these
- phenomena, it is not so likely that they should exhibit themselves in
- the other. The inhabitants of Sicily and Naples, we are
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_271">271</span> told, regard
- eruptions of Etna and Vesuvius as safeguards against earthquakes. A
- similar belief is to be found in portions of South America with regard
- to the volcanoes for which that country is so celebrated.</p>
-
- <p>From an examination of the records of the large earthquakes and the
- volcanic eruptions which have taken place in Japan during the last
- 2,000 years, Dr. Naumann found that there was often an approximate
- coincidence between the times of the occurrence of these phenomena,
- suggesting the idea that the efforts which had been sufficient to
- establish the volcano had at the same time been sufficient to shake the
- ground.</p>
-
- <p>Of destructive earthquakes which have occurred at the time of volcanic
- eruptions, and of examples when these phenomena have occurred at widely
- separated intervals, the records are extremely numerous.</p>
-
- <p><em>Want of synchronism between earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.</em>—Many
- of the great earthquakes of South America do not appear to have been
- connected with volcanic eruptions.</p>
-
- <p>The great earthquakes of the world, like those of Calabria and Lisbon,
- which took place in regions which are not volcanic, have not, Fuchs
- tells us, taken place in conjunction with volcanic outbursts.</p>
-
- <p>In Japan, as in the Sandwich Islands and in many other parts of the
- globe, the small earthquakes which occur almost daily do not appear to
- show any marked connection with volcanic disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>In 1881, during the eruption of Natustake, a volcano lying about
- a hundred miles north of Tokio, there was neither an increase nor
- a decrease in the earthquakes which were felt in Tokio. Similar
- remarks apply to the state of seismic activity of 1876–77, when
- Oshima, a volcanic island about seventy miles to the south of Tokio,
- was in eruption.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_272">272</span>
- In the Sandwich Islands Mauna Loa seems to have
- its eruptions independently of the disturbances which shake these
- islands.<a id="FNanchor_116" href="#Footnote_116" class="fnanchor">[116]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Synchronism of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.</em>—Although many
- examples like the above may be quoted, which apparently show an utter
- want of connection between earthquakes and volcanoes, we must not
- overlook that class of earthquakes which almost invariably accompany
- all great volcanic disturbances. In fact the sudden explosions which
- take place at volcanic foci, as, for instance, at the commencement
- of an eruption, are enumerated as one of the causes which produce
- earthquakes. Earthquakes like these usually continue until the pressure
- of the steam and lava have found for themselves an opening. As compared
- with the total number of earthquakes which are recorded, they form but
- an insignificant portion.</p>
-
- <p>The direct connection which exists between these phenomena has, no
- doubt, done very much to spread the popular belief that all earthquakes
- may be connected with volcanic eruptions. As examples where this
- connection has existed we might quote from almost all the volcanic
- countries in the world.</p>
-
- <p>Thus, Fuchs tells us that on October 6, 1737, almost the whole of
- Kamschatka and the Kurile Islands were disturbed by movements which
- were simultaneous with the outbreak of the great volcano Klutschenskja
- of North Kamschatka.</p>
-
- <p>One of the earliest records of a severe earthquake and a volcanic
- eruption occurring simultaneously is found in the accounts of the
- destruction of Herculaneum and Pompeii. The throwing up of Monte Nuovo
- in the neighbourhood of Pozzuoli was accompanied with a dreadful
- earthquake.<a id="FNanchor_117" href="#Footnote_117" class="fnanchor">[117]</a></p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_273">273</span></p>
-
- <p>In 1868 the earthquake of Arequipa was accompanied by the opening of
- the volcano Misti, on its north side. The distance to the volcano is
- about fourteen miles.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the eruptions of Kilauea in 1789 the ground shook and
- rocked so that persons could not stand.</p>
-
- <p>The first eruption of the volcano Irasu, in Costa Rica (1783), was
- accompanied by violent earthquakes.<a id="FNanchor_118" href="#Footnote_118" class="fnanchor">[118]</a> The smoke and flames which
- are said to have issued from the side of Mount Fojo at the time of the
- Lisbon earthquake are regarded by some as having been volcanic. Others
- thought that the phenomena, rather than being on the side of Fojo,
- which showed no traces of volcanic action, had taken place in the ocean.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the great earthquake at Concepcion (1835), whilst the
- waves were coming in, two great submarine eruptions were observed. One,
- behind the Isle of Quiriquina, appeared like a column of smoke. The
- other, in the bay of San Vicente, appeared to form a whirlpool. The
- sea-water became black, and had a sulphurous smell, there being a vast
- eruption of gas in bubbles. Many fish were killed.<a id="FNanchor_119" href="#Footnote_119" class="fnanchor">[119]</a></p>
-
- <p>With this same earthquake, near to Juan Fernandez, about one mile from
- the shore, the sea appeared to boil, and a high column of smoke was
- thrown into the air. At night flames were seen.</p>
-
- <p>In 1861, when Mendoza was destroyed and 10,000 inhabitants killed, a
- volcano at the foot of which Mendoza is situated burst into eruption.</p>
-
- <p>The earthquake of 1822 at Valdivia was accompanied by eruptions of the
- neighbouring mountains, which only lasted a few minutes.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of the Leghorn shocks (January 16–27, 1742) some fishermen
- observed a part of the sea to rage
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_274">274</span>violently, to raise itself to a
- great height, and then rush landwards.<a id="FNanchor_120" href="#Footnote_120" class="fnanchor">[120]</a></p>
-
- <p>In 1797, when Riobamba was destroyed, the neighbouring volcanoes were
- not affected, but Mount Pasto, 120 miles distant, suddenly ceased to
- throw out its usual column of water.</p>
-
- <p>On the night of December 10, 1874, a strong shock was felt in New
- England, whilst at 4.45 <span class="smcap">a.m.</span> on December 11 a shock was felt
- in the Pic du Midi, in the Pyrenees. In the middle of December there
- were volcanic outbursts in Iceland.<a id="FNanchor_121" href="#Footnote_121" class="fnanchor">[121]</a></p>
-
- <p>It is possible that these occurrences might be the results of some
- widespread disturbance beneath the crust of the earth, or perhaps even
- of widely extended earth pulsations. The probability, however, is that
- these coincidences are accidental. When we remember that in a small
- area like the northern half of Japan alone there are periods when there
- are at least two shocks per day on the average, it is impossible for
- these coincidences not to exist. Less frequently coincidences between
- the larger disturbances must occur. Over and above these accidental
- coincidences, it would appear that in the world’s history periods
- have occurred when earthquakes were unusually frequent, and at such
- times distant countries have suffered simultaneously. This approximate
- coincidence in period, which has been referred to when speaking of the
- distribution of destructive earthquakes in historical time, does not
- imply an exact synchronism in the single shocks.</p>
-
- <p>Small earthquakes, or, more properly speaking, local tremblings, are a
- necessary accompaniment of almost all volcanic eruptions. Tremors of
- this description are seldom, however, felt beyond the crater, or at the
- most upon the flanks of the mountain where the eruption is going on.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_275">275</span></p>
-
- <p>They are due to the explosive action of steam bursting through the
- molten lava.</p>
-
- <p><em>Volcanic eruption succeeding earthquakes.</em>—Sometimes it has happened
- that an earthquake, or a series of earthquakes, have terminated with
- the formation of volcanic vents.</p>
-
- <p>As an example of a volcanic outburst terminating a seismic disturbance,
- may be mentioned the appearance of a new volcano in the centre of
- Lake Ilopango, as a sequel to the shocks which had disturbed that
- neighbourhood in 1879.<a id="FNanchor_122" href="#Footnote_122" class="fnanchor">[122]</a></p>
-
- <p>In 1750 there were continuous shakings lasting over three months at
- Manilla. These terminated with an eruption of a small island in the
- middle of a neighbouring lake. Three days after the commencement of
- this eruption, four other small islands rose in the same lake.<a id="FNanchor_123" href="#Footnote_123" class="fnanchor">[123]</a></p>
-
- <p>Antonio d’Ulloa, when speaking of the Andes, remarks that after a
- volcanic eruption the shocks cease.<a id="FNanchor_124" href="#Footnote_124" class="fnanchor">[124]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Conclusion.</em>—Looking at this question generally, insomuch as the
- greatest number of volcanic eruptions appear, according to Fuchs,
- to have taken place in summer, whilst the greatest number of its
- earthquakes have apparently taken place in winter, it would seem that
- the two phenomena are without any direct connection, unless it be that
- both are different effects of a common cause.</p>
-
- <p>Regarded in this manner, an earthquake may be looked upon as an
- uncompleted effort to establish a volcano. To use the words of Mallet,
- ‘The forces of explosion and impulse are the same in both; they differ
- only in degree <span class="pagenum" id="Page_276">276</span>
- of energy, or on the varying sorts and degrees of
- resistance opposed to them.’<a id="FNanchor_125" href="#Footnote_125" class="fnanchor">[125]</a></p>
-
- <p>Although we have many examples of earthquakes having occurred without
- volcanic eruptions, and, on the other hand, of volcanic eruptions
- without earthquakes, volcanoes may still be regarded as ‘safety-valves
- of the earth’s crust,’ which, by giving relief to internal stresses,
- guard us against the effects of earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>That many earthquakes are felt at Copiapo is attributed to the fact
- that in the neighbouring mountains there are no volcanic vents.</p>
-
- <p>We must not, however, overrate the protective influence of volcanoes.
- In the Sandwich Islands we see the columns of liquid lava in
- neighbouring mountains standing at different heights, indicating a
- want of subterranean connection between these vents. In consequence
- of this it would seem that enormous pressures might be generated in
- the neighbourhood of one of these mountains without finding relief at
- the other. When we have conditions like these, it would seem that the
- eruption of a volcano may have little or no influence in protecting
- neighbouring districts.</p>
-
- <p>This may possibly be the explanation of the fact that in 1835
- Concepcion was destroyed, notwithstanding there being an unusual
- activity in the volcanic vents of the neighbouring mountains.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XVII">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_277">277</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XVII.<br />
- <span class="subhead">THE CAUSE OF EARTHQUAKES.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Modern views respecting the cause of earthquakes—Earthquakes due
- to faulting—To explosions of steam—To volcanic evisceration—To
- chemical degradation—Attractive influence of the heavenly
- bodies—The effect of oceanic tides—Variation in atmospheric
- pressure—Fluctuation in temperature—Winds and earthquakes—Rain
- and earthquakes—Conclusion.</div>
-
- <p>As the results of modern inquiries respecting the cause of earthquakes,
- we see many investigators chiefly attributing these phenomena to
- special causes. A few attribute them to several causes. It seems to us
- that they might be attributed to very many causes which often act in
- a complex manner. The primary causes are telluric heats, solar heat,
- and variations in gravitating influences. These may be the principal,
- and sometimes the immediate, cause of an earthquake. The secondary
- causes are those dependent upon the primary causes, such as expansions
- and contractions of the earth’s crust, variations in temperature,
- barometrical pressure, rain, wind, the attractive influences of the
- sun and moon in producing tides in the ocean or the earth’s crust,
- variations in the distribution of stress upon the earth’s surface
- caused by processes of degradation, the alterations in the position of
- isogeothermal surfaces, &amp;c.</p>
-
- <p>The part which may be played by these various causes
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_278">278</span> in the production
- of oscillations, pulsations, and tremors will be referred to.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquakes consequent on faulting.</em>—In the chapter on Earth
- Oscillations, the causes producing the phenomena of elevation and
- depression are briefly indicated.</p>
-
- <p>By the variations in stress accompanying elevations and depressions,
- cracks are produced. Inasmuch as compression would crush the rocks
- constituting the earth’s crust, we must conclude with Captain Dutton
- that these cracks are formed by tension. By elevation, the upper rigid
- crust of the earth is stretched, and fissures are produced. The sudden
- formation of these fissures or faults gives rise to earthquakes, and
- perhaps also to volcanic vents. That earthquake and volcanic regions
- are situated on areas where there is evidence of rapid elevation is
- strikingly illustrated round the shores of the Pacific.</p>
-
- <p>Lasaulx considered that the earthquake of Herzogenrath was more
- or less intimately connected with the great mountain fissure—the
- <em>Feldbiss</em>—which crosses the coal region of the Wurm.<a id="FNanchor_126" href="#Footnote_126" class="fnanchor">[126]</a> The sudden
- elevation or sinking of large areas at the time of an earthquake may be
- a consequence of these dislocations.</p>
-
- <p>It has already been pointed out that the earthquake region of Japan
- is the one where we have evidence of recent and rapid elevation. That
- certain earthquakes of this region may possibly be the result of
- faulting we have the evidence of our senses and of our instruments. The
- sudden blows and jolts which are sometimes felt are indicative of the
- sliding of one mass of rock across another.</p>
-
- <p>Should the ground be simply torn asunder, this tearing would give rise
- to a series of waves of distortion, vibrating in directions parallel
- to the plane of the fissure. Supposing this motion to be propagated
- to a number of <span class="pagenum" id="Page_279">279</span>
- surrounding stations, it would be recorded at each of
- these as having the same direction. To those situated on a line forming
- a continuation of the strike of the fissure, the vibrations would
- advance so to speak <em>end on</em>, whilst to those stations lying in a line
- perpendicular to the strike of the fissure, the motion would advance
- <em>broadside on</em>.</p>
-
- <p>Motions like these latter have been recorded in Tokio, where
- earthquakes which from time observations were known to have come from
- the faulted and rising region to the south have been registered as a
- series of east and west motions, or vibrations transverse to this line
- of propagation.</p>
-
- <p>It must, however, be here mentioned that the registration of only
- transverse motion may possibly be due to the extinction of normal
- motion, although this is not generally regarded as probable.</p>
-
- <p>It would therefore appear that certain earthquakes and faults are
- closely related phenomena, the former being an immediate effect of
- the latter. Faults are due to earth oscillations, and to a variety of
- causes producing disturbances in the equilibrium of the earth’s crust;
- the principal cause of all these phenomena being alterations in the
- distribution of heat, and the attractive force of gravity.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquakes consequent on the explosion of steam.</em>—Humboldt regarded
- volcanoes and earthquakes as the results of a common cause, which he
- formulated as ‘the reaction of the fiery interior of the earth upon
- its rigid crust.’ Certain investigators, who have endeavoured to
- reduce Humboldt’s explanation to definite limits, have suggested that
- earthquakes may be due to sudden outbursts of steam beneath the crust
- of the earth, and its final escape through cracks and fissures.</p>
-
- <p>Admitting that steam may accumulate by separating
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_280">280</span> out from the cooling
- interior of our globe, its sudden explosion might be brought about by
- its own expansive force, or by the movements in the bubbling mass from
- which it originated.</p>
-
- <p>Others, however, rather than regard the steam as being a primeval
- constituent of the earth’s interior, imagine it arises from the gradual
- percolation of water from the surface of the earth down to volcanic
- foci, into which it is admitted against opposing pressures, by virtue
- of capillary action.</p>
-
- <p>Mallet, in his account of the Neapolitan earthquake, shows that the
- whole of the observed phenomena can be accounted for by the admission
- of steam into a fissure, which by the expansive force exerted on its
- walls was rent open. Just as at the Geysers we hear the thud and
- feel the trembling produced by the sudden evolution and condensation
- of steam, so may steam by its sudden evolution and condensation in
- the ground beneath us give rise to a series of shocks of varying
- intensity, accompanied by intermediate vibratory motions—that is to
- say, a motion which, as judged of by our feelings, is not unlike many
- earthquakes. Often it may happen that the result of the explosion may
- be the production of a fault, or at least a fissure; and thus in the
- resulting movements we may have a variety of vibrations, some being
- those of compression and distortion, produced by the blow of the
- explosion, and others being those of distortion alone, produced by the
- shearing action which may have taken place by the opening of the fault.
- Sometimes one set of these vibrations may be prominent, and sometimes
- the other. Thus, when we say that an earthquake has shown evidence by
- the nature of its vibrations that it was produced by a fault, this
- by no means precludes the possibility that an explosion of steam may
- also have been connected<span class="pagenum" id="Page_281">281</span>
- with the production of the disturbance.
- Mallet threw out the suggestion that the opening of fissures beneath
- the ocean might admit water to volcanic foci. During the time that the
- water was in the spheroidal state, the preliminary tremors, so common
- to many earthquakes, would be produced. These would be followed by the
- explosion, or series of explosions, constituting the shock or shocks of
- the earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>The chief reasons for believing that the earthquakes of North-Eastern
- Japan are partly due to explosive efforts are:—</p>
-
- <p>1. That the greater number of disturbances, perhaps ninety per cent.,
- originate beneath the sea, where we may imagine that the ground,
- under the superincumbent hydrostatic pressure, is continuously being
- saturated with moisture.</p>
-
- <p>2. Many of the diagrams show that the prominent vibrations, of which
- there are usually from one to three, in a given disturbance have the
- same character as those produced by an explosive like dynamite, the
- greatest and probably the most rapid motions being inwards towards the
- origin.</p>
-
- <p>It may here be remarked that a very large proportion of the destructive
- earthquakes of the world have originated beneath the sea, as has often
- been testified by the succeeding sea waves. Also, it must be observed,
- that earthquake countries, like volcanic countries, are chiefly those
- which have a coast line sloping at a steep angle beneath the sea—that
- is to say, earthquakes are frequent along coasts bordered by deep water.</p>
-
- <p>The earthquakes which occur at volcanic foci constitute another class
- of disturbances which may be accredited to the explosive efforts of
- steam.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquakes due to volcanic evisceration.</em>—By the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_282">282</span> ejection of ashes
- and lava from volcanic vents, there is an extensive evisceration of
- the neighbouring ground. When we look at a volcano like Fujiyama,
- 13,000 feet in height, and at least fifty miles in circumference, and
- remember that the mass of cinders and slag of which it is composed
- came from beneath the area on which it rests, the point to be wondered
- at is, that earthquakes, consequent on the collapse of subterranean
- hollows, are not more frequent than they are. At the time of a single
- eruption of a volcano, the quantity of lava ejected amounts to many
- thousand millions of cubic feet. In 1783 the quantity of lava ejected
- from Skaptas Joknee, in Iceland, was estimated as surpassing ‘in
- magnitude the bulk of Mont Blanc.’<a id="FNanchor_127" href="#Footnote_127" class="fnanchor">[127]</a> Admitting that hollow spaces
- are the results of these eruptions, and that in consequence of this
- evisceration the ground is rendered unstable, the instability being
- increased by the additional load placed above the eviscerated area, it
- would seem that from time to time earthquakes are inevitable.</p>
-
- <p>Facts, however, teach us that volcanoes act as safety valves, and
- that, as a rule, at or shortly after an eruption, earthquakes cease.
- The relationship of earthquakes to volcanic eruptions would therefore
- indicate, notwithstanding the arguments put forward to show that an
- area loaded by a volcano has in consequence of the evisceration and the
- load a quaquaversal dip, that evisceration does not take place beneath
- volcanoes as is usually supposed, and we may conclude that it is but
- few earthquakes which have an origin due to these causes.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquakes and evisceration by chemical degradation.</em>—A powerful
- agent, which tends to the formation of subterranean hollows, is
- chemical degradation. The effects of this have been often measured by
- quantitative <span class="pagenum" id="Page_283">283</span>
- analysis of the solid materials which are daily carried
- away by many of our springs. In limestone districts this is very great.
- Prof. Ramsay estimates that the mineral matter discharged annually by
- the hot springs of Bath is equivalent in bulk to a column 140 feet in
- height and 9 feet in diameter. At San Filippo, in Tuscany, the solid
- matter discharged from the springs has formed a hill a mile and a
- quarter long, a third of a mile broad, and 250 feet in thickness.<a id="FNanchor_128" href="#Footnote_128" class="fnanchor">[128]</a>
- Many other examples of subterranean chemical degradation will be found
- in text-books of geology.</p>
-
- <p>By this chemical action large cavernous hollows are produced. Beneath
- a volcano it is probable that liquid material immediately takes the
- place of that which is ejected, and that hollows are not formed as in
- the case of chemical degradation. If a cavern becomes too large, it
- eventually collapses.</p>
-
- <p>Of the falling in of large excavations we have examples in large mines.
- As a consequence, not only is a trembling produced, but also a noise,
- which is so like that produced by certain earthquakes that the South
- American miners have but one word, ‘bramido,’ to express both.<a id="FNanchor_129" href="#Footnote_129" class="fnanchor">[129]</a></p>
-
- <p>Boussingault, who was an advocate for the theory that many earthquakes
- are produced by the sinking of the ground, calls attention to the fact
- that we have evidences of the subsidence of great mountains, like
- the Andes, the districts around which are so well known for their
- earthquakes. Capac Urcu is one of these mountains which legends tell us
- has decreased in height.</p>
-
- <p>The variation in the height of mountains is a subject which deserves
- attention. That mountains may possibly be hollow, we have the
- remarkable results attained by <span class="pagenum" id="Page_284">284</span>
- Captain Herschel, who found that the
- attractive force of gravity in the neighbourhood of the Himalayas was
- not so great as it ought to have been had these mountains been solid.
- The Rev. O. Fisher gives another explanation of this phenomenon.
- Palmieri considers that the terrible earthquake which devastated
- Casamicciola (1881) was due to the hot springs having gradually eaten
- out cavernous spaces beneath the town. The extremely local character of
- this shock was certainly favourable to such a view.</p>
-
- <p>The earthquake which, in 1840, caused Mount Cernans, in the Jura, to
- fall, is also attributed to the solvent action of waters in undermining
- its foundations. This undermining action was in great measure probably
- due to a large spring, which, twenty-five years previously, had
- disappeared, and which subsequently may possibly have been slowly
- disintegrating the foundations of the mountain. Earthquakes of this
- order would be principally confined to districts where there are rocks
- which are more or less soluble, as, for instance, rock salt, gypsum,
- and limestone.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquakes and the attractive influences of the heavenly bodies.</em>—The
- most important attractions exercised upon our planet are those due to
- the sun and moon. To these influences we owe the tides in our ocean,
- and possibly elastic tides in the earth’s crust. Some theorists would
- also insist upon liquid tides in the fluid interior of our earth. The
- nature of the earth’s interior is, however, a question on which there
- is a diversity of opinion.</p>
-
- <p>One doctrine, which, until recent years, received much support, was
- that the interior of the earth was a reservoir of molten matter
- contained within a thin crust. Hopkins showed that the least
- possible thickness of such a crust must be from 800 or 1,000 miles,
- otherwise the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_285">285</span>
- motions of precession and nutation would be subject to interference.</p>
-
- <p>M. Delauney objected to the views of Hopkins, on the supposition that
- the fluid interior of the earth had a certain viscosity.</p>
-
- <p>Sir William Thomson arrives at the conclusion that the earth on the
- whole must be more rigid than a continuous solid globe of glass. Mr.
- George H. Darwin’s investigations on the bodily tides of viscous or
- semi-elastic spheroids tend to strengthen the arguments of Sir William
- Thomson.</p>
-
- <p>Some philosophers hold the view that the central portion of the earth,
- although intensely hot, is solid by pressure, whilst the outer crust is
- solid by cooling. Between the two there is a shell of liquid or viscous
- molten matter.</p>
-
- <p>Another argument is, that although the interior of the globe may be
- solid, it is only retained in that condition by an immense pressure, on
- the relief of which it is liquefied—it is potentially liquid.</p>
-
- <p>As these views, and the arguments for and against them, are to be
- found in all modern text-books of geology, we will at once proceed
- to consider the effect of solar and lunar attractive influences in
- producing earthquakes upon a globe which is either solid, partially
- solid, or which has an interior wholly liquid.</p>
-
- <p><em>Effect of the attractive influences of the sun and moon.</em>—In 1854
- M. F. Zantedeschi put forward the view—that it is probable there is
- a continual tendency of the earth to protuberance in the direction
- of the radii vectores of the two luminaries which attract it. In
- consequence of these protuberances, pendulums ought at one time to
- swing more slowly than at others. Zantedeschi remarks that the periods
- of earthquakes appear to confirm
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_286">286</span> such a view, insomuch as they occur
- more often at the syzygies, or epoch of the spring tides, than at neap
- tides—an observation found in the works of Georges Baglivi (1703) and
- Joseph Toaldo (1770).<a id="FNanchor_130" href="#Footnote_130" class="fnanchor">[130]</a></p>
-
- <p>Prof. Perrey, of Dijon, who did so much for seismology, held the view
- that the preponderance in the number of earthquakes felt at particular
- seasons was possibly due to the attractive influence of the sun and
- moon producing a tide in the fluid interior of the earth, which, acting
- on the solid crust, produced fractures.</p>
-
- <p>Rudolf Falb, whose writings have of late years attracted considerable
- attention, brings forward views which may be regarded as amplifications
- of those suggested by Perrey.</p>
-
- <p>According to Falb, the inner portion of the earth must be regarded as
- fluid. In the crust above this fluid reservoir are cracks and channels,
- into which, by the attraction of the moon and sun, the fluid is drawn.
- On entering these cracks cooling takes place, together with explosions
- of gas and subterranean volcanic disturbances. The attractions
- producing the internal tides required by Falb are chiefly dependent
- upon the following factors:—</p>
-
- <p>1. The nearness and distance of the sun from the earth (January 1 and
- July 1).</p>
-
- <p>2. The position of the moon with regard to the earth, which in every
- twenty-seven days is once near and once distant.</p>
-
- <p>3. The phases of the moon—whether full or new moon (syzygies), or
- whether first or last quarter (quadratures).</p>
-
- <p>4. The equinoxes, the position of the sun in the equator, and the
- relative position of the earth.</p>
-
- <p>5. The position of the moon relative to the equator.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_287">287</span></p>
-
- <p>6. The concurrence of the ‘centrifugal force’ of the earth with the
- last quarter of the moon.</p>
-
- <p>7. The entrance of the moon on the ecliptic—the so-called nodes.</p>
-
- <p>Assuming that earthquakes are wholly consequent on these attractions,
- it at once becomes possible to predict their occurrence. This Falb
- does, and when his predictions have been fulfilled he has certainly
- gained notoriety.</p>
-
- <p>He commenced by the predictions of great storms. In 1873 he predicted
- the destructive earthquake of Belluno, which earned for himself a
- eulogistic poem, which he has republished in his ‘Gedanken und Studien
- über Vulkanismus.’ After this, in 1874, he predicted the eruption of
- Etna. He also explained why, in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 4000, there should have
- been a great flood, and for <span class="smcap">a.d.</span> 6400 he predicts a repetition
- of such an occurrence.</p>
-
- <p>When we approach the question of the extent to which the attraction
- of the sun and moon may influence the production of earthquakes, a
- question which we have to answer is, whether it is likely that the
- attractive power of the moon is so great that it could draw up the
- crust the earth beyond its elastic limits. We know what it can do with
- water. It can lift up a hemispherical shell 8,000 miles in diameter
- about two or three feet higher at its crown than it lifts the earth.
- Even supposing the solid crust to be lifted 100 times the apparent
- rise of the tide, is it likely that a hemispherical arch 8,000 miles
- in diameter when it is raised 200 feet at its crown could by any
- possibility suffer fracture? If an arch is 12,000 miles in length, all
- that we here ask is, whether the materials which compose the arch are
- sufficiently elastic to allow themselves to be so far stretched that
- the crown may be raised 200 feet. The result which we should arrive
- at is apparently so obvious that actual calculation seems hardly
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_288">288</span>
- necessary. If we regard the earth as being solid, the question resolves
- itself into the inquiry as to whether a column of rock, which is equal
- in length to the diameter of the earth, or about 8,000 miles, can be
- elongated 200 feet without a fracture. This is equivalent to asking
- whether a piece of rock one yard in length can be stretched one seventy
- thousandth of a foot. Considering that this is a quantity which is
- scarcely appreciable under the most powerful of our microscopes, we
- must also regard this as a question which it is hardly necessary to
- enter into calculations about before giving it an answer. To vary
- the method of treating such a question, may we not ask what is the
- utmost limit to which it would be possible to raise up or stretch the
- crust of the earth without danger of a fracture? Thus, for instance,
- to what extent might a column of rock be elongated without danger
- of its being broken? From what we know of the tenacity of materials
- like brick and their moduli of elasticity, it would seem possible to
- stretch a bar of rock 8,000 miles in length for approximately half
- a mile before expecting it to break. As to whether there is a wave,
- the height of which is equal to half this quantity, running round our
- earth as successive portions of its surface pass beneath the attracting
- influences of the sun and moon, is a phenomenon which, if it exists,
- would probably long ago have met with a practical demonstration.</p>
-
- <p>The deformation which a solid globe or spherical shell would
- experience under the attractive influences of the sun and moon has
- been investigated by Lamé, Thomson, Darwin, and other physicists and
- mathematicians.</p>
-
- <p>A conclusion that we are led to as one result of these valuable
- investigations is, that if the interior of the earth be fluid, and
- covered with a thin shell, then enormous
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_289">289</span> elastic tides must be
- produced. A consequent phenomenon, dependent on the existence of these
- tides, would be a marked regularity in the occurrence of earthquakes.
- As this marked regularity does not exist, we must conclude that
- earthquakes are not due to the attractive influences of the sun and
- moon acting upon the thin crust of the earth covering a fluid interior.
- The periodicity of earthquakes corroborates the conclusions of Sir
- William Thomson, who remarks that if the earth were not extremely rigid
- the enormous elastic tides which must result would be sufficient to
- lift the waters of the ocean up and down so that the oceanic tide would
- be obliterated.</p>
-
- <p>Assuming that the earth has the rigidity assigned to it by mathematical
- and physical investigators, we nevertheless have travelling round our
- earth, following the attractions of the moon and sun, a tidal stress.
- This stress, imposed upon an area in a critical state, may cause it to
- give way, and thus be the origin of an earthquake. Earthquakes ought
- therefore to be more numerous when these stresses are the greatest.</p>
-
- <p>The periods of maximum stress or greatest pull exerted by the moon and
- sun will occur when these bodies are nearest to our planet—that is, in
- perigee and perihelion, and again when they are acting in conjunction
- or at the syzygies. That earthquakes are <em>slightly</em> more numerous
- at these particular periods than at others is a strong reason for
- believing that the attractions of the moon and sun enter into the list
- of causes producing these phenomena.</p>
-
- <p>Had there been a strongly marked distinction in the number of
- earthquakes occurring at these particular seasons as compared with
- others, we might have attributed earthquakes to the existence of
- elastic tides of a sensible<span class="pagenum" id="Page_290">290</span>
- magnitude. As the facts stand, it appears
- that the maximum pulls exerted by the moon and sun are only sufficient
- to cause a slight preponderance in the number of earthquakes felt at
- particular seasons, and therefore that these pulls only result in
- earthquakes when the distorting effort has been exerted on an area
- which, by volcanic evisceration, the pressure of included gases, and
- other causes, is on the verge of yielding.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquakes and the tides.</em>—If we assume that earthquakes are in many
- cases due to the overloading of an area and its consequent fracture,
- such loading may occur by the rising of the tide. A belief that the
- earthquakes of Japan were attributable to the tides may be found in the
- diary of Richard Cocks under the date November 7, 1618, who remarks:—</p>
-
- <p>‘And, as we retorned, about ten aclock, hapned a greate earthquake,
- which caused many people to run out of their howses. And about the lyke
- hower the night following hapned an other, this countrey being much
- subject to them. And that which is comunely markd, they allwais hapen
- at a hie water (or full sea); so it is thought it chauseth per reason
- is much wind blowen into hollow caves under ground at a loe water, and
- the sea flowing in after, and stoping the passage out, causeth these
- earthquakes, to fynd passage or vent for the wind shut up.’<a id="FNanchor_131" href="#Footnote_131" class="fnanchor">[131]</a></p>
-
- <p>Although we may not acquiesce in Cock’s views respecting the imprisoned
- wind, it would seem that a comparison of the occurrence of earthquakes
- and the state of the tide would be a legitimate research. Inasmuch
- as the stresses which are brought to bear upon an area by the rising
- of the tide are so very much greater than those due to barometrical
- changes, it is not unlikely <span class="pagenum" id="Page_291">291</span>
- that a marked connection would be found.
- But it must be remembered that because researches, so far as they have
- gone, tend to show that earth movements are more frequent when an area
- is relieved of a load, it is not unlikely that the greatest number of
- earthquakes may be found to occur at low water. Prof. W. S. Chaplin
- attempted to make this investigation in Japan, but not being able to
- obtain the necessary information respecting the tides, was compelled to
- relinquish this interesting work.</p>
-
- <p>Every foot of rise in a tide is equivalent to a load being placed on
- the area over which the tide takes place of sixty-two pounds to the
- square foot. This load is not evenly distributed, but stops abruptly at
- a coast line. Lastly, it may be observed that many coast lines are not
- simultaneously subjected to stresses consequent upon this load. Japan,
- for instance, may be regarded as an arch placed horizontally. The
- area near the crown of this arch is loaded by the tidal wave crossing
- the Pacific before the areas near the abutment, and farther there is
- a horizontal pressure at the crown which, if Japan were like a raft,
- would tend, as the tide advanced, to straighten its bow-like form, but
- as the wave passed its abutments to increase its curvature.</p>
-
- <p>Prof. G. Darwin has calculated the amount of rise and fall of a shore
- line due to tidal loads (see <a href="#Page_336">p. 336</a>, ‘Earth Pulsations’). The result
- of these calculations apparently indicates that these loads may have a
- considerable influence upon the stability of an area in a more or less
- critical condition.</p>
-
- <p>Mr. J. Carruthers suggests that tidal action may hold a general but
- indirect relationship to volcanic and seismic action by the retardation
- it causes on the earth’s rotation. By this retardation the polar axis
- tends to lengthen, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_292">292</span>
- tensile stresses are induced, resulting in
- fracture. The fluid interior of the earth, being no longer restrained,
- would move polewards, and, leaving equatorial portions unsupported,
- this would gradually collapse. The primary fractures would be north and
- south, while the secondary fractures would be east and west.<a id="FNanchor_132" href="#Footnote_132" class="fnanchor">[132]</a></p>
-
- <p>That the rise of the tide is accompanied by a greater percolation
- of water to volcanic foci, which, in consequence, assume a greater
- state of activity, is a theory which was advanced many years ago. To
- determine how far tides may directly be connected with earthquakes, the
- necessary records have yet to be examined.</p>
-
- <p><em>Variations in atmospheric pressure.</em>—When we consider the immense
- load which, by a sudden rise of the barometer, is placed upon the area
- over which this rise takes place, it is not difficult to imagine that
- this rise may occasionally be the final cause which makes the crust of
- the earth to give way. A barometric rise of an inch is equivalent to a
- load of about seventy-two pounds being put upon every square foot of
- area over which this rise takes place. On the other hand, a fall in the
- barometric column indicates that a load has been removed, and whatever
- elastic effort may be exerted by subterranean forces in endeavouring to
- escape, being met by less resistance, they may burst these bonds, and
- an earthquake will result. For reasons such as these the final cause
- of earthquakes has often been attributed to variations in atmospheric
- pressure. In Japan there are practically as many earthquakes with a
- high barometer as with a low one.</p>
-
- <p>The extent to which barometric fluctuations have acted as final causes
- in the production of earthquakes may be judged of by a comparison of
- the times of barometric<span class="pagenum" id="Page_293">293</span>
- variation and the times at which earthquakes have occurred.</p>
-
- <p>Three important laws of barometric variation are the following:—</p>
-
- <p>1. In the world generally the average barometric pressure is highest in
- winter. (Exceptions occur near Iceland and in the North Pacific.)</p>
-
- <p>2. The summer and winter monthly mean barometer differs least near the
- equator and over the great oceans. They differ most over the great
- continents and generally with increasing latitude.</p>
-
- <p>3. The greatest number of barometrical fluctuations usually take place
- in winter.</p>
-
- <p>Inasmuch as there are generally more earthquakes in winter than in
- summer, the first of these laws would indicate that this might be due
- to the greater load which acts upon the crust of the earth at that
- season. The second law would indicate that the distinction between
- the winter and summer earthquakes ought to be most marked in high
- latitudes, which, if we refer to the table on p. 257, we observe to be
- borne out by the results of observation. The countries where there are
- as many earthquakes in winter as in summer are chiefly those in low
- latitudes. The number of these countries from which we have records
- are, however, few.</p>
-
- <p>Facts opposed to the idea that earthquakes may be caused by an increase
- of barometric pressure are the results of observations like those of
- Schmidt and Rossi, which show that earthquakes chiefly occur with a low
- barometer.</p>
-
- <p>Assuming that these latter observations will be found by future
- investigators to be generally true, we must conclude that the relief
- of atmospheric pressure has an influence upon the occurrence of
- earthquakes. Such a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_294">294</span>
- conclusion would partially accord with the third
- barometrical law, or the fact that there are more occasions on which we
- get a low barometer during the winter months.</p>
-
- <p>Other writers who have examined this question are Volger, Kluge,
- Andrès, and Poly. The latter investigator sought a connection between
- earthquakes and revolving storms, in the centres of which there is
- usually an abnormal decrease of atmospheric pressure. If an area over
- which such a sudden change in pressure took place was in a critical
- state, it is not difficult to see that storms such as Poly refers to
- might sometimes be accompanied by earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p><em>Fluctuations in temperature.</em>—Inasmuch as fluctuations in temperature
- are governed by the sun, it may at once be said that there is a
- connection between earthquakes and readings of the thermometer.
- Certainly earthquakes occur mostly during the cold months or in
- winter. Similarly, as changes in temperature are so closely connected
- with barometric fluctuations, and these are said to have a direct
- influence upon the yielding of the earth’s crust, seismic phenomena are
- indirectly linked to fluctuations in temperature. A rise in temperature
- is usually accompanied by a fall in the barometer, and this in turn may
- be a condition favourable for the occurrence of an earthquake.</p>
-
- <p>If we regard solar heat as an agent causing expansions or contractions
- in the earth’s crust, then fluctuations in temperature become an
- immediate cause of earthquakes. The probability, however, is that
- solar heat has little or no connection with the final cause producing
- earthquakes, although at the same time coincidences between the
- occurrence of earthquakes and unusual fluctuations in temperature may
- from time to time be observed.</p>
-
- <p><em>Winds and earthquakes.</em>—Although it may be
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_295">295</span> admitted that high winds
- exert enormous pressures upon mountain ranges, and might occasionally
- give rise to stresses causing rocky masses in unstable equilibrium to
- give way, the coincidences which have been established between the
- occurrence of storms and earthquakes can usually only be regarded as
- occurrences which have synchronised by chance.</p>
-
- <p>Storms are usually accompanied with a barometric depression, and the
- relation of diminutions in atmospheric pressure to earthquakes has been
- discussed.</p>
-
- <p><em>Rain and earthquakes.</em>—It has already been shown that earthquakes
- have occasionally been found to coincide with rain and rainy seasons.
- Whether the saturation of the ground with moisture or the percolation
- of the same to volcanic foci may be a direct effect producing
- earthquakes it is difficult to say. The probability, however, is
- that, rain being dependent on phenomena like changes in temperature,
- barometric fluctuations, and winds, we must regard it and the
- earthquakes which happen to coincide with these precipitations of
- moisture as congruent effects of more general causes.</p>
-
- <p><em>Conclusion.</em>—Although it would be an easy matter to discuss the
- relationship of earthquakes and other phenomena, we must conclude
- that the primary cause of earthquakes is endogenous to our earth, and
- that exogenous phenomena, like the attraction of the sun and moon and
- barometric fluctuations, play but a small part in the actual production
- of these phenomena, their greatest effect being to cause a slight
- preponderance in the number of earthquakes at particular seasons. They
- may, therefore, sometimes be regarded as final causes. The majority of
- earthquakes are due to explosive efforts at volcanic foci. The greater
- number of these explosions take place beneath the sea, and are probably
- due to the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_296">296</span>
- admission of water through fissures to the heated rocks
- beneath. A smaller number of earthquakes originate at actual volcanoes.
- Some earthquakes are produced by the sudden fracture of rocky strata or
- the production of faults. This may be attributable to stresses brought
- about by elevatory pressure. Lastly, we have earthquakes due to the
- collapse of underground excavations.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XVIII">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_297">297</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XVIII.<br />
- <span class="subhead">PREDICTION OF EARTHQUAKES.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- General nature of predictions—Prediction by the observation of
- unusual phenomena (alteration in the appearance and taste of
- springs; underground noises; preliminary tremors; earthquake
- prophets—warnings furnished by animals, &amp;c.)—Earthquake warning.</div>
-
- <p><em>General nature of predictions.</em>—Ever since seismology has been
- studied, one of the chief aims of its students has been to discover
- some means which would enable them to foretell the coming of an
- earthquake, and the attempts which have been made by workers in various
- countries to correlate these occurrences with other well-marked
- phenomena may be regarded as attempts in this direction.</p>
-
- <p>Ability to herald the approach of these calamities would unquestionably
- be an inestimable boon to all who dwell in earthquake-shaken countries,
- and the attempts which have been made both here and in other places are
- extremely praiseworthy. In almost all countries where earthquakes are
- of common occurrence these movements of the earth have been more or
- less connected with certain phenomena which, in the popular mind, are
- supposed to be associated with an approach of an earthquake.</p>
-
- <p>If predictions were given in general terms, and they only referred
- to time, inasmuch as on the average there are in the world several
- shakings per day, we should<span class="pagenum" id="Page_298">298</span>
- always find that predictions were
- verified. We might even go further and predict that on certain days
- earthquakes would occur in certain countries, and still find that in
- many instances our supposed power of foresight had not deceived us.
- Thus, for instance, in Japan, where on the average there are probably
- one or two shakings every day, if prognostications were never correct
- there would be a violation of the laws of chance.</p>
-
- <p>What is required from those who undertake to forewarn us of an
- earthquake is an indication not only of the time at which the
- disturbance will happen, but also an indication of the area in which
- it is to occur. Those who dwell in an area where there are certain
- well-defined periods during which seismic activity is at a maximum—if
- ten or fourteen days should have passed without a shock—might, in many
- instances, find that a prophecy that there would be an earthquake
- within the next few days would prove itself correct. Also, if a severe
- shock had taken place, a prophecy that there would be a second or
- third smaller disturbance within a short period would also meet with
- verification.</p>
-
- <p>Certain persons with whom I am intimate appear to have persuaded
- themselves that they can foretell the coming of an earthquake by the
- sultry state of the atmosphere or a certain oppressiveness they feel,
- and an instinctive feeling arises that an earthquake is at hand.</p>
-
- <p>It is said that a few minutes before many of the shocks which shook
- New England between 1827 and 1847 people could foretell the coming
- disturbance by an alteration in their stomach.<a id="FNanchor_133" href="#Footnote_133" class="fnanchor">[133]</a> No doubt many who
- dwell in earthquake countries, and have been alarmed by earthquakes,
- are at times subject to nervous expectancy.</p>
-
- <p>The author has had such sensations himself, due, perhaps,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_299">299</span> to a
- knowledge that it was the earthquake season, that there had been no
- disturbance for some weeks, and a consequent increasing state of
- nervous presentments. In consequence of this, not only has he carefully
- prepared his instruments for the coming shock, but he has written and
- telegraphed to friends to do the same.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes these guesses have proved correct. One remarkable instance
- was a few hours prior to the severe shock of February 22, 1880, when
- he communicated with his friends in Yokohama and asked them to see
- that their instruments were in good order. Oftener, however, his
- prognostications have been incorrect. The point in connection with
- this subject which he wishes to be remarked is, that the instances
- where earthquakes occurred shortly after the receipt of his letters
- are carefully remembered, and often mentioned, but the instances in
- which earthquakes did not occur appear to be entirely forgotten. He is
- led to mention these facts because they appear to be an experimental
- proof of what has taken place in bygone times, and what still takes
- place, especially amongst savages—namely, that the record of that which
- is remarkable survives, whilst that which is of every-day occurrence
- quickly dies. Had the records of all prognostications been preserved,
- the probability is that we should find that they had, in the majority
- of cases, been incorrect, whilst it would have been but in very few
- instances they had been fulfilled.</p>
-
- <p><em>Prediction by the observation of natural phenomena.</em>—The above remarks
- may perhaps help us to understand the prognostications of the ancient
- philosophers about which Professor Antonio Favaro, of Padua, has
- written.<a id="FNanchor_134" href="#Footnote_134" class="fnanchor">[134]</a> Cicero in the ‘De Divinatione,’ speaking on this subject,
- says that ‘God has not predicted so much
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_300">300</span>as the divine intelligence of
- man.’—‘Non Deus prævidet tantum, sed et divini in genii viri.’ Favaro
- regards these predictions, however, as the result of observations of
- nature which show it is possible that indications of coming earthquakes
- had been announced by variations in the gas given out from subterranean
- sources, the change in colour, taste, level, temperature of the water
- in springs, &amp;c.</p>
-
- <p>In 1843 a bishop of Ischia forewarned his people of a conning
- earthquake, and thus was instrumental in the saving of many lives.
- Naturally, in an age of superstition, the bishop would be regarded as
- a prophet, but Favaro considers that the prognostication was probably
- due to a knowledge of premonitory signs as exhibited in changes in the
- characters of mineral waters.</p>
-
- <p>The shock of 1851, at Melfi, was in this way predicted by the Capuchin
- fathers, who observed that a lake near their door became frothy and
- turbulent.</p>
-
- <p>Underground noises have led persons to the belief that an earthquake
- was at hand. It was in this way that Viduari, a prisoner at Lima,
- predicted the destruction of that city.</p>
-
- <p>Before the earthquake of 1868, so severely felt at Iquique, the
- inhabitants were terrified by loud subterranean noises.</p>
-
- <p>That underground noises have preceded earthquakes by considerable
- intervals appears to be a fact, but, at the same time, it must
- be remembered that similar noises have often occurred without an
- earthquake having taken place.</p>
-
- <p>Farmers predicted the earthquake of St. Remo, in 1831, by underground
- noises.</p>
-
- <p>On the day before the earthquake which, in 1873, shook Mount Baldo,
- the inhabitants of Puos, a village north of Lake Santa Croce, heard
- underground noises.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_301">301</span></p>
-
- <p>Before the earthquakes which, in 1783, shook Calabria and Sicily, fish
- are said to have appeared in great numbers on the coast of Sicily, and
- the whirlpool of Charybdis assumed an unusual excited state.</p>
-
- <p>It is said that Pherecydes predicted the earthquakes of Lacedemon and
- Helm out, by the taste of the water in the very deep well at the castle
- of Lovain.<a id="FNanchor_135" href="#Footnote_135" class="fnanchor">[135]</a></p>
-
- <p>The writer of an article on the Lisbon earthquake says that ‘after the
- 24th I felt apprehensive, as I observed the same prognostics as on the
- afternoon of October 31, that is, the weather was severe, the wind
- northerly, a fog came from the sea, the water in a fountain ran of a
- yellow clay colour, and’ he adds, ‘from midnight to the morning of the
- 25th I felt five shocks.’<a id="FNanchor_136" href="#Footnote_136" class="fnanchor">[136]</a></p>
-
- <p>At the present time Rudolf Falb, following a theory based upon the
- attractive influences of the sun and moon, tells us the time at which
- we are to expect earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>That occasionally there are signs attendant on earthquakes, although
- we cannot give them a physical explanation, we cannot doubt. Also we
- know that in certain areas earthquakes are more likely to occur at
- one season than at another. Should earthquakes be foretold with the
- assistance of knowledge of this description, the predictions at once
- become the result of the application of certain natural laws, and are
- not to be regarded as predictions in the popularly accepted sense of
- that term, any more than the arrival of a friend is predicted by the
- previous receipt of a telegram announcing his coming.</p>
-
- <p>Rather than accredit the ancients and those of more modern times who,
- in consequence of their feelings, have recorded the coming of an
- earthquake, with a knowledge of premonitory signs, we might in many
- instances regard <span class="pagenum" id="Page_302">302</span>
- the records of those prognostications as the survival
- of accidental guesses, and, as such, examples of the survival of the
- useless.</p>
-
- <p>The effect of accidental occurrences of this description upon an
- uneducated mind, in engendering superstition, is a subject which has
- often been dwelt upon, and the difficulty of eradicating the same—as
- may be judged of by the following accident which came under the
- observation of Mr. T. B. Lloyd and the author, in 1873, when travelling
- in Newfoundland—will be easily appreciated.</p>
-
- <p>At the time to which I refer, my companion was bringing a canoe down
- the rapids below the Grand Pond in a country which is practically
- uninhabited, and where an Indian trapper would perhaps be the only
- person met with, and this not more than once a year. Whilst shooting
- the rapids one of the Indians, Reuben Soulian, shot at a deer passing
- up one bank of the river. That the deer had been hit was testified by a
- trail of blood which bespattered the rocks. Subsequently several more
- shots were fired, and it was believed by all that the deer was killed.
- Soulian quickly followed the animal to the spot where it was supposed
- to have fallen. Some time after he returned, having failed to find any
- trace of the animal. He was greatly agitated, but eventually became
- melancholy, saying that the sudden disappearance of the animal was a
- sure sign that some of his relations had suddenly died. About two hours
- afterwards Mr. Lloyd’s party met with a party of Indians coming up
- the river, the first they had seen for four weeks, who told them that
- Soulian’s sister had just died on the coast.</p>
-
- <p>In the northern part of South America certain shocks are anticipated by
- preliminary vibrations which cause a little bell attached to a T-shaped
- frame (cruz sonante) to ring. There are, however, persons (trembloron)
- who are<span class="pagenum" id="Page_303">303</span>
- supposed to be endowed with seismic foresight, whose verdicts
- are much relied upon.</p>
-
- <p>In Caraccas it is said that nearly every street in the river suburb has
- an earthquake Cassandra or two. Some of these go so far not only as
- to predict the coming seisms, but also the vicissitudes of particular
- streets.<a id="FNanchor_137" href="#Footnote_137" class="fnanchor">[137]</a> Earthquake prophets are, however, by no means confined to
- the new world, and many examples of them may be found in the histories
- of countries where earthquakes have been felt.</p>
-
- <p>The story of the crazy lifeguardsman who prophesied an earthquake to
- take place in London on April 4, 1691, is an example. The Rev. Sig.
- Pasquel E. Perdini, writing on the earthquakes at Leghorn in 1742,
- says that ‘a Milanese astrologer predicted this earthquake for January
- 27, by which “misfortune” the faith and credit given to the astrologer
- gained him more reverence and honour than the prophets and holy
- gospel.’ Before the time at which he predicted a second shock, people
- removed away from Leghorn.</p>
-
- <p><em>Warnings furnished by animals.</em>—A study of the warnings furnished by
- animals is also interesting. Several of the natives in Caraccas possess
- oracular quadrupeds, such as dogs, cats, and jerboas, which anticipate
- coming dangers by their restlessness.</p>
-
- <p>Before the catastrophe of 1812, at Caraccas, a Spanish stallion broke
- out from its stable and escaped to the highlands, which was regarded
- as the result of the prescience of a coming calamity. Before the
- disturbances of 1822 and 1835, which shook Chili, immense flocks of sea
- birds flew inland, as if they had been alarmed by the commencement of
- some suboceanic disturbance. Before this
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_304">304</span>last shock it is also related
- that all the dogs escaped from the city of Talcahuano.</p>
-
- <p><em>Earthquake warning.</em>—What has here been said respecting the prediction
- of earthquakes is necessarily imperfect—many of the signs which are
- popularly supposed to enable persons to foretell the coming of an
- earthquake having already been mentioned in previous chapters. That
- we shall yet be able to prepare ourselves against the coming of
- earthquakes, by the applications of laws governing these disturbances,
- is not an unreasonable hope.</p>
-
- <p>With an electric circuit which is closed by a movement of the ground,
- we are already in a position to warn the dwellers in surrounding
- districts that a movement is approaching.</p>
-
- <p>An earthquake which travelled at the rate of four seconds to the
- mile might, if it were allowed to close a circuit which fired a gun
- at a station fifteen miles distant, give the inhabitants at that
- place a minute’s warning to leave their houses. The inhabitants of
- Australia and the western shores of the Pacific might, by telegraphic
- communication, receive eighteen to twenty-five hours’ warning of the
- coming of destructive sea waves resulting from earthquakes in South
- America.</p>
-
- <p>Although warnings like these might have their value, that which is
- chiefly required is to warn the dwellers at and near an earthquake
- centre of coming disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>What the results of the observations on earth tremors will lead to is
- problematical.</p>
-
- <p>Should microseismic observation enable us to say when and where the
- minute movements of the soil will reach a head, a valuable contribution
- to the insurance of human safety in earthquake regions will have been
- attained.</p>
-
- <p>As to whether the movements of tromometers are destined to become
- barometric-like warnings of increased
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_305">305</span> activity beneath the earth
- crust, or whether they are only due to vibrations of the earth
- crust produced by variations in atmospheric pressure, has yet to be
- investigated.</p>
-
- <p>Other phenomena which may probably forewarn us of the coming of an
- earthquake are phenomena resultant on the stresses brought to bear upon
- the rocky crust previous to its fracture, or phenomena due to changes
- in the position and condition of heated materials beneath the earth’s
- surface. Amongst these may be mentioned electrical disturbances, which
- appear to be so closely related to seismic phenomena.</p>
-
- <p>At the time of earthquakes telegraph lines have been disturbed, but
- as to what may happen before an earthquake we have as yet but little
- information. The subject of earthquake warning is of importance to many
- countries, and is deserving of attention.</p>
-
- <p>As our knowledge of earth movements, and their attendant phenomena,
- increases, there is but little doubt that laws will gradually be
- formulated, and in the future, as telluric disturbances increase, a
- large black ball gradually ascending a staff may warn the inhabitants
- on the land of a coming earthquake, with as much certainty as the ball
- upon a pole at many seaports warns the mariner of coming storms.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XIX">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_306">306</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XIX.<br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTH TREMORS.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Artificially produced tremors—Observations of Kater, Denman,
- Airy, Palmer, Paul—Natural tremors—Observations of Zöllner,
- M. d’Abbadie, G. H. and H. Darwin—Experiments in Japan—With
- seismoscopes, microphones, pendulums—Work in Italy—Bertelli,
- Count Malvasia, M. S. di Rossi—Instruments employed in
- Italy—Tromometers, microseismographs, microphones—Results
- obtained in Italy—in Japan—Cause of microseismic motion.</div>
-
- <p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">During</span> the past few years considerable attention has been drawn towards
- the study of small vibratory motions of the ground, which to the
- unaided senses are usually passed by without recognition. These motions
- are called <em>earth tremors</em>. Their discovery appears to have been due
- to accident, and not to the results of inductive reasoning. No sooner
- had philosophers contrived astronomical and other instruments for the
- purpose of making refined measurements and observations than they at
- once discovered that they had an enemy to contend against in the form
- of microscopic earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p><em>Artificially produced tremors.</em>—Artificial disturbances of this
- description exist in all our towns, and near a railway line they are
- perceptible with every passing train. Those who have used microscopes
- of high power will readily appreciate how small a disturbance of
- the ground is visible in the apparent movement of the object under
- examination.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_307">307</span></p>
-
- <p>Captain Kater found that he could not perform his pendulum experiments
- in London on account of the vibrations produced by the rolling of
- carriages. Captain Denman, who made some observations on artificially
- produced tremors, found that a goods train produced an effect 1,100
- feet distant in marshy ground over sandstone. Vertically, however,
- above a tunnel through the sandstone, the effects only extended 100
- feet.</p>
-
- <p>A remarkable example of the trouble which artificially produced earth
- vibrations have occasioned those who make astronomical observations
- occurred some twenty years ago at the Greenwich Observatory. When
- determining the collimation error of the transit circle by means of the
- reflexion of a star in a tray of mercury, it was found that on certain
- nights the surface of the mercury was in such a state of trembling
- that the observers were unable to complete their observations until
- long after midnight. After obtaining a series of dates on which these
- disturbances occurred, it was found that they coincided with public and
- bank holidays, on which days crowds of the poorer classes of London
- flocked to Greenwich Park, and there amused themselves with running and
- rolling down the hill on which the observatory is situated. On these
- occasions it was found that the disturbances in the mercury were such
- that observations could not be made until two or three hours after the
- crowds had been turned out of the neighbouring park.<a id="FNanchor_138" href="#Footnote_138" class="fnanchor">[138]</a></p>
-
- <p>To obviate this difficulty Sir George Airy suspended his dish of
- mercury in a system of india-rubber bands, and in this way succeeded in
- eating the intruders up.</p>
-
- <p>Lieutenant-Colonel H. S. Palmer, R.E., when engaged with the transit
- of Venus expedition in New Zealand, in 1874, was troubled with
- vibrations produced from a <span class="pagenum" id="Page_308">308</span>
- neighbouring railway. To escape the enemy
- he intrenched his instruments by placing them in pits. With pits
- 3½ feet deep he found himself sufficiently protected. The distance
- from the line was about 400 yards, and the soil through which the
- disturbances were propagated was a coarse pebbly gravel.<a id="FNanchor_139" href="#Footnote_139" class="fnanchor">[139]</a></p>
-
- <p>Before the United States Naval Observatory was established at
- Washington, Professor H. M. Paul was deputed to make a tremor survey
- to discover stable ground. The results of these experiments were
- exceedingly interesting. By watching the reflected image of a star in
- a dish of mercury a passing train would be noticed at the distance of
- a mile. Its approach could be detected by the trembling of the image
- before its coming could be heard. At one point of observation the
- disturbance appeared to be cut off by a ravine. The strata was gravel
- and clay.<a id="FNanchor_140" href="#Footnote_140" class="fnanchor">[140]</a></p>
-
- <p>These few examples of artificially produced tremors, to which many
- more might be added, have been given because they teach us something
- respecting their nature. Hitherto earth tremors have only been regarded
- as intruders, which it was necessary to escape from or destroy. From
- what has been said they appear to be a superficial disturbance which
- is propagated to an enormous distance. This distance appears to
- depend upon the propagating medium, upon the intensity of the initial
- disturbance, and upon its duration. In the observation of these
- artificial disturbances, which are accessible to every one, and which
- hitherto have been so neglected, we have undoubtedly a fruitful source
- of study.</p>
-
- <p><em>Natural tremors.</em>—Next let us turn to those microscopical disturbances
- of our soil which are due to natural
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_309">309</span>causes. Thus far they seem to
- have been recorded wherever instruments suitable for their detection
- have been erected, and it is not improbable that they are common to the
- surface of the whole globe.</p>
-
- <p>Some of the more definite observations which have been made upon earth
- tremors were those made in connection with experiments on the deviation
- of the vertical due to the attractive influence of the moon and sun.</p>
-
- <p>Professor Zöllner, who invented the horizontal pendulum which he used
- in the attempt to measure the change in level due to lunar and solar
- attraction, found his instruments so sensitive that the readings were
- always changing.</p>
-
- <p>The most interesting observations which were made upon small
- disturbances of the soil were those of M. d’Abbadie, who carried on his
- experiments at Abbadia, in Subernoa, near Hendaye, 400 mètres distant
- from the Atlantic, and 62 mètres above sea level. The soil was a loamy
- rock. Here M. d’Abbadie constructed a concrete cone 8 mètres in height,
- which was pierced down the centre by a vertical hole or well, which was
- continued two mètres below the cone into the solid rock. At the bottom
- of this hole or well a pool of mercury was formed which reflected
- the image of cross wires placed at the top of the hole. These cross
- wires and their reflection were observed by means of a microscope.
- The observations consisted in noting the displacement and azimuth of
- the reflected image relatively to the real image of the wires. After
- allowing this structure five years to settle, M. d’Abbadie commenced
- his observations. To find the surface of the mercury tranquil was
- a rare occurrence. Sometimes the mercury appeared to be in violent
- motion, although both the air and neighbouring sea were perfectly calm.
- At times the reflected image would disappear as if the mercury had been
- disturbed by a microscopic earthquake.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_310">310</span></p>
-
- <p>The relative positions of the images were in part governed by the state
- of the tide. Altogether the movements were so strange that M. d’Abbadie
- did not venture any speculations as to their cause, but he remarks
- that the cause of the changes he observed were sometimes neither
- astronomical nor thermometrical. These observations, the principal
- object of which was to determine changes in level rather than earth
- vibrations, were carried on between the years 1868 and 1872.<a id="FNanchor_141" href="#Footnote_141" class="fnanchor">[141]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Observations at Cambridge.</em>—Another instructive set of observations
- were those which were made in the years 1880–1882, by George and Horace
- Darwin, in the Cavendish Laboratory, at Cambridge. The main object
- in these experiments was to determine the disturbing influence of
- gravity produced by lunar attraction. The result which was obtained,
- however, showed that the soil at Cambridge was in such an incessant
- state of vibration that whatever pull the moon may have exerted upon
- the instrument which was employed was masked by the magnitude of the
- effects produced by the earth tremors, and the experiments had, in
- consequence, to be abandoned.</p>
-
- <p>The principle of this instrument was similar to one devised by Sir
- William Thomson, and put up by him in his laboratory at Glasgow.
- As erected by the brothers Darwin, at Cambridge, it was briefly as
- follows: A pendulum, which was a massive cylinder of pure copper,
- was hung by a copper wire, about four feet long, inside a hollow
- cylindrical tube rising from a stone support. A small mirror was then
- hung by two silk fibres, one of which was fastened to the bob and the
- other to the stone basement. A ray of light sent from a lamp on to
- the mirror was reflected to a scale seven feet distant, and by this
- magnification any motion of the bob relatively to
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_311">311</span>the stone support
- was magnified 50,000 times. In several ways the apparatus was insulated
- from all accidental disturbances. The spot of light was observed from
- another room by means of a telescope. This instrument was so delicate
- that even at the distance of sixteen feet the shifting of your weight
- from one foot to the other caused the spot of light to run along the
- scale. So sensitive was the instrument that, notwithstanding its being
- cut off from the surrounding soil by a trench filled with water and
- the whole instrument being immersed in water to damp out the small
- vibrations, it would seem that the ground was in a constant state of
- tremor; in fact, so persistent and irregular were these movements that
- it seemed impossible to separate them from the perturbations due to the
- attraction of the moon.<a id="FNanchor_142" href="#Footnote_142" class="fnanchor">[142]</a></p>
-
- <p>As a result of observations like these, the world had gradually
- forced upon it the fact that the ground on which we live is probably
- everywhere in what is practically an incessant state of vibration.</p>
-
- <p>This led those who were interested in the study of earth movements to
- establish special apparatus for the purpose of recording these motions
- with the hope of eventually discovering the laws by which they were
- governed.</p>
-
- <p><em>Experiments in Japan.</em>—The simpler forms of apparatus which have been
- used in Japan may be described as delicate forms of seismoscopes,
- which, in addition to recording earth tremors, also record the
- occurrence of small earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>A simple contrivance which may be used for the purpose of recording
- small earthquakes can be made with a small compass needle.</p>
-
- <p>If a light, small sensitive compass needle be placed on
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_312">312</span>a table, it
- will be found that a small piece of iron like a nail may be pushed so
- near to it that the needle assumes a position of extremely unstable
- equilibrium. If the table now receives the slightest tap or shake this
- condition is overcome, and the needle flies to the iron and there
- remains. By making the support of the needle and the iron the poles of
- an electric circuit it is possible to register the time at which motion
- took place with considerable accuracy.</p>
-
- <p>With crude apparatus like this a large number of small earth
- disturbances have been recorded.</p>
-
- <p>Another form of apparatus, employed in Japan, has been a delicately
- constructed <em>circuit closer</em>. The motions of this instrument were
- recorded by causing an electro-magnet to deflect a pencil which was
- tracing a circle on a revolving dial. The revolving dial was a disc of
- wood covered with paper fixed to the hour-hand axle of a common clock.</p>
-
- <p>A third form of apparatus used in Japan consisted of a small piece of
- sheet lead about the size of a threepenny piece suspended by a short
- loop from a rigid support. Projecting from the lead a fine wire, about
- two inches in length, passed freely through a hole in a metallic plate.
- By the slightest motion of the support the small pendulum of lead was
- set into a state of tremor and caused its pointer to come in contact
- with one or other side of the hole in the metal plate and thus to close
- an electric circuit.</p>
-
- <p>A more refined kind of apparatus which has been employed in Japan was
- similar to that used by the Darwins at Cambridge. This was so arranged
- that any deflection of the mirror was permanent until the instrument
- was reset, and in this way the maximum disturbance which had taken
- place between each observation was recorded.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_313">313</span></p>
-
- <p>In addition to these and other contrivances, experiments were made with
- microphones.</p>
-
- <p>The microphones used were small doubly pointed pencils of carbon
- about three centimetres long, saturated with mercury, and supported
- vertically in pivot holes bored in other pieces of carbon, which were
- the terminals of an electric circuit. These microphones were screwed
- down on the top of stakes driven deeply into the ground. They were
- covered with a glass shade thickly greased at its base. The stakes were
- in the ground at the bottom of a small pit—about two feet square and
- two feet deep—which was lined with a box. The box was covered with a
- lid, and earth to the depth of nine inches or one foot. One of these
- pits was in the middle of a lawn in the front of my house, and the
- other was at the foot of a hill at the back of the house. The wires
- from the microphone passed through the side of the box into a bamboo
- tube and thence up to my dining-room and bed-room. In one of the
- circuits there were three Daniell’s cells, a telephone, and a small
- galvanometer. I used the galvanometer because I found that when there
- was sufficient motion in the microphone to produce a sound in the
- telephone a motion in the needle of a galvanometer was produced. If in
- any case motion took place in the magnetic needle during my absence, it
- was held deflected by a small piece of iron with which it was brought
- into contact by the movement.</p>
-
- <p>The sensitiveness of the arrangement may be judged of from the fact
- that if a person walked on the grass within six feet of the microphone,
- each step caused a creak in the telephone, and the needle of the
- galvanometer was caused to swing and come in contact with the iron.
- Dogs running on the grass had no effect. A small stone one or two
- inches in diameter thrown from the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_314">314</span> house so that it fell near to the
- microphone pit caused a sharp creak in the telephone and a movement in
- the needle.</p>
-
- <p>The nature of the records I received from this contrivance may be
- judged of from the following extract from my papers.</p>
-
- <table summary="Microphone contrivance readings">
- <tr>
- <th>&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="tdl">&nbsp;h. m.</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">1879. Nov. 12th</td>
- <td class="tdl">7&nbsp; &nbsp;0 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> contact of needle</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdl">7&nbsp; &nbsp;2&nbsp; „&nbsp; difficult to set the needle</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdl">7&nbsp; &nbsp;3&nbsp; „&nbsp; needle swings and telephone creaks</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdl">7&nbsp; &nbsp;4&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdl">7&nbsp; &nbsp;5&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdl">7&nbsp; &nbsp;6&nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdl">7 10&nbsp; „&nbsp; 3 more swings</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="tdl">7 11&nbsp; „&nbsp; again&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p class="noindent">Here I went out, took away the covering, and examined the microphone.
- Nothing wrong was to be observed. All that I saw was one small ant. I
- do not think that this could have caused the disturbance, because it
- could not get near the instrument.</p>
-
- <p>On the succeeding nights I experienced similar disturbances, and it
- seemed as if they might possibly have been the prelude to several small
- shocks which occurred about this time (November 15, 16, and 17). On
- November 17, at 8 <span class="smcap">a.m.</span>, the needle was found in contact, and
- again at 5 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span>, and at 6 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> the shock of a small
- earthquake was felt <em>which caused a rattling sound in the telephone for
- about one minute after the motion had appeared to cease</em>. The needle
- swung considerably, but did not come in contact.</p>
-
- <p>The great objection to these observations is that it is possible
- that the movements and sounds which I have recorded might, with the
- exception of one case when the shaking was actually felt, possibly have
- been produced by causes other than that of the movement of the ground.
- To determine this I subsequently put up two distinct sets
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_315">315</span> of apparatus
- to determine whether the motions of each were synchronous. So far as
- I went this appeared only to be sometimes the case:—but this is a
- question difficult to determine, unless a recorder of time be added to
- the apparatus.</p>
-
- <p>The greatest objection to observations of this sort is that the
- sensibility of the instrument is not constant. After a current has been
- running for several days it is no longer sensible to slight shocks, it
- appears as if its resistance had been increased. To overcome this it is
- necessary to resharpen the carbon points and bore out the pivot holes
- every three or four days. Farther, the battery varies. This might to
- some extent be overcome by using a battery with large plates. These
- two causes tend to reduce the sensitiveness of the galvanometer-like
- recorder—the deflection of the needle gradually becoming less and less,
- and therefore day by day needing a greater swing to bring it into
- contact with the iron. For reasons such as these this instrument, to be
- used successfully, appears to require considerable attention.</p>
-
- <p>Another form of microphone employed by the author consisted of an
- aluminium wire standing vertically on a metallic plate, its upper end
- passing loosely through a hole in an aluminium wire standard.</p>
-
- <p>The upper end of the vertical wire was loaded with lead. This
- contrivance possesses all the sensitiveness of an ordinary microphone,
- whilst, if it receives a sudden impulse, there is a sudden break in the
- current, and the vertical wire is thrown from one side to the other of
- the hole in the standard.</p>
-
- <p>After many months of tiresome observation with instruments of this
- description, and after eliminating all motions which might have been
- produced by accidental causes, the general result obtained showed that
- in Tokio<span class="pagenum" id="Page_316">316</span>
- there were movements of the soil to be detected every day,
- and sometimes many times per day, which to ordinary persons were passed
- by unnoticed.</p>
-
- <p><em>Work in Italy.</em>—The most satisfactory observations which have been
- made upon microseismic disturbances are those which have been made
- during the last ten years in Italy. The father of systematical
- microseismical research appears to have been Father Timoteo Bertelli,
- of Florence.</p>
-
- <p>In 1870 Father Bertelli suspended a pendulum in a cellar, and observed
- it with a microscope. As the result of his observations it was
- announced that he had perceived the earthquakes which shook Romagna,
- although to the ordinary observer in Florence these shakings had not
- been perceptible.</p>
-
- <p>In 1873 Bertelli, by means of microscopes fixed in several azimuths,
- made 5,500 observations on free pendulums. He also made observations on
- reflections from the surface of mercury.<a id="FNanchor_143" href="#Footnote_143" class="fnanchor">[143]</a></p>
-
- <p>One result of these observations was to show that microseismic motions
- increased with a fall of the barometer. Similar observations were made
- at Bologna by M. le Conte Malvasia, and also by M. S. di Rossi, near
- Rome. On January 14, 15, and February 25 these three observers at their
- respective stations simultaneously observed great disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>Similar investigations were made at Nice by M. le Baron Prost.</p>
-
- <p>Although doubt was cast upon Bertelli’s observations they appear to
- have been the origin of a series of microseismical observations, a
- distinguished leader in which is Professor Rossi, who, in 1874, found
- that large earthquakes were almost always preceded or accompanied with
- microseismical<span class="pagenum" id="Page_317">317</span>
- storms. In 1878 Professor Rossi worked upon these small
- disturbances with the assistance of the microphone and telephone, and
- his first results were published by Professor Palmieri.</p>
-
- <p>Many of Professor Rossi’s observations were made in the grotto of Roca
- de Papa, 700 mètres high and eighteen mètres under the soil. Here over
- 6,000 observations were made by means of microscopes, on pendulums of
- different lengths, suspended in tubes cut in the solid rock.</p>
-
- <p><em>Instruments employed in Italy.</em>—It is impossible to describe in detail
- the various forms of apparatus which have been used by the Italian
- investigators. A description of one or two of the more important
- instruments may not, however, be out of place, inasmuch as they will
- assist the reader to understand the manner in which the various results
- respecting the laws governing microseismic movements have been arrived
- at.</p>
-
- <p>The most important of these instruments is the <em>Normal Tromometer</em> of
- Bertelli and Rossi.</p>
-
- <p>This consists of a pendulum 1½ metres long, carrying, by means of
- a very fine wire, a weight of 100 grammes. To the base of the bob
- a vertical stile is attached, and the whole is enclosed in a tube
- terminated, at its base, by a glass prism of such a form that when
- looked through horizontally the motion of the stile can be seen in
- all azimuths. In front of this prism a microscope is placed. Inside
- the microscope there is a micromatic scale, so arranged that it can
- be turned to coincide with the apparent direction of oscillation of
- the point of the stile. In this way not only can the amplitude of the
- motion of the stile be measured, but also its azimuth. The extent of
- vertical motion is measured by the up and down motion of the stile due
- to the elasticity of the supporting<span class="pagenum" id="Page_318">318</span>
- wire. This instrument is shown in the accompanying drawing.</p>
-
- <div class="figleft">
- <img src="images/i_p318.jpg" width="303" height="545" alt="" />
- <div class="caption">
- <span class="smcap">Fig. 37.</span>—Normal Tromometer.<br />
- <span class="small">
- <span class="smcap">b</span>, bob of pendulum; <span class="smcap">p</span>, prism;
- <span class="smcap">m</span>, microscope; <span class="smcap">s</span>, rim of scale.
- </span>
- </div>
- </div>
-
- <p>Another apparatus is the <em>Microseismograph</em> of Professor Rossi. Here we
- have an arrangement which gives automatic records of slight motions.
- It consists of four pendulums, each about three feet long, suspended
- so that they form the corners of a square platform. In the centre
- of this platform a fifth, but rather longer, pendulum is suspended.
- The four pendulums are each connected just above their bobs to the
- central pendulum with loose silk threads. Fixed to the centre of each
- of these threads, and held vertically by a light spring, is a needle,
- so adjusted that each thread is depressed to form an obtuse angle of
- about 155°. These needles form the terminals of an electric circuit,
- the other termination of which is a small cup of mercury placed just
- below the lower end of the needle. By a horizontal swing of one of the
- pendulums this arrangement causes the needle to move vertically, but
- with a slightly multiplied amplitude. By this motion the needle comes
- in contact with the mercury, and an electro-magnet with a lever and
- pencil is caused to make a mark on a band of paper moved by clockwork.
- The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_319">319</span>
- five pendulums being of different lengths allows the apparatus to
- respond ‘to seismic waves of different
- velocities.’<a id="FNanchor_144" href="#Footnote_144" class="fnanchor">[144]</a></p>
-
- <p>Lastly, we have Professor Rossi’s <em>Microphone</em>. This consists of a
- metallic swing arranged like the beam of a balance. By means of a
- movable weight at one end of the beam this is so adjusted that it
- falls down until it comes in contact with a metallic stop. This can be
- so adjusted that a slight tap will cause the beam to slightly jump from
- the stop. The beam and the stop form two poles of an electric circuit,
- in which there is a telephone. The slightest motion in a <em>vertical</em>
- direction causes a fluctuation in the current passing between the stop
- and the beam, and a consequent noise is heard in the telephone.</p>
-
- <p>With instruments analogous to these, observations have been made by
- various observers in all portions of Italy, extending over a period
- of ten years. Every precaution appears to have been taken to avoid
- accidental disturbances, and the experiments have been repeated in a
- variety of forms.</p>
-
- <p><em>Results obtained in Italy.</em>—The results which from time to time have
- been announced are of the greatest interest to those who study the
- physics of the earth’s crust, and they appear to be leading to the
- establishment of laws of scientific value.</p>
-
- <p>It would seem that the soil of Italy is in incessant movement, there
- being periods of excessive activity usually lasting about ten days.
- Such periods are called seismic storms. These storms are separated by
- periods of relative calm. These storms have their greater regularity
- in winter, and sharp maximums are to be observed in spring and autumn.
- In the midst of such a period or
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_320">320</span>at its end there is usually an
- earthquake. Usually these storms are closely related to barometric
- depressions. To distinguish these movements from those which occur
- under high pressure, the latter are called baro seismic movements, and
- the former <em>vulcano seismic</em> movements. The relation of these storms
- to barometric fluctuation has been observed to have been very marked
- during the time of a volcanic eruption.</p>
-
- <p>At the commencement of a storm the motions are usually small, and one
- storm, lasting two or three days, may be joined to another storm.
- In such a case the action may be a local one. It has been observed
- that a barometrical depression tended to bring a storm to a maximum,
- whilst an increase of pressure would cause it to disappear. Sometimes
- these actions are purely local, but at other times they may affect a
- considerable tract of land.</p>
-
- <p>If a number of pendulums of different length are observed at the same
- place, there is a general similarity in their movements, but it is also
- evident that the free period of the pendulum more or less disturbs
- the character of the record. The greatest amplitude of motion in a
- set of pendulums is not reached simultaneously by all the pendulums,
- and at every disturbance the movement of one will predominate. From
- this Rossi argues that the character of the microseismical motions is
- not constant. Bertelli observed that the direction of oscillation of
- the pendulums is different at different places, but each place will
- have its particular direction dependent upon the direction of valleys
- and chains of mountains in the neighbourhood. Rossi shows that the
- directions of movement are perpendicular to the direction of lines of
- faults, the lips of these fractures rising and falling, and producing
- two sets of waves, one set parallel to the line of fracture,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_321">321</span> and the
- other perpendicular to such a direction. These movements, according
- to Bertelli, have no connection with the wind, rain, change of
- temperature, and atmospheric electricity.</p>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/i_p321.jpg" width="542" height="444" alt="" />
- <div class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig. 38.</span></div>
- </div>
-
- <p>The disturbances, as recorded at different towns, are not always
- strictly synchronous, but succeed each other at short intervals. If,
- however, we take monthly curves of the disturbances as recorded at
- different towns in Italy, we see that these are similar in character.
- The maximum of disturbance occurs about the winter solstice, and the
- minimum about the summer solstice, and in this respect they exhibit
- a perfect accordance with the curves drawn by Mallet to show the
- periodicity of earthquakes. The accompanying curves taken from one
- of Bertelli’s original memoirs not only show this general result but
- also show<span class="pagenum" id="Page_322">322</span>
- the close accord there is between the results obtained at
- different towns during successive months.</p>
-
- <p>At Florence, before a period of earthquakes there is an increase in the
- amplitude and frequency of vertical movements. These vertical movements
- do not appear to coincide with the barometrical disturbances, but they
- appear to be connected with the seismic disturbances.</p>
-
- <p>They are usually accompanied with noises in the telephone, but as the
- microphone is so constructed as to be more sensitive to vertical motion
- than to horizontal motion, this is to be expected. This vertical motion
- would appear to be a local action, inasmuch as the accompanying motions
- of an earthquake which originates at a distance are horizontal.</p>
-
- <p>Storms of microseismical motions appear to travel from point to point.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes a local earthquake is not noticed in the tromometer,
- whilst one which occurred at a distance, although it may be small,
- is distinctly observed. To explain this, Bertelli suggests the
- existence of nodes. Similar conclusions were arrived at by Rossi when
- experimenting on different portions of the sides of Vesuvius. Galli
- noticed an augmentation in microseismic activity when the sun and moon
- are near the meridian. Grablovitz found from Bertelli’s observations
- a maximum two or three days before the syzygies, and a minimum
- three days after these periods. He also found that the principal
- large disturbances occurred in the middle of periods separating
- the quadrature from the syzygies, the apogee from perigee, and the
- lunistigi period from the nodes, whilst the smallest disturbances
- happened in the middle of periods opposed to these.</p>
-
- <p>P. C. Melzi says that the curves of microseismical motions,
- earthquakes, lunar and solar motions, show a concordance with each
- other.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_323">323</span></p>
-
- <p>With the microphone Rossi hears sounds which he describes as roarings,
- explosions, occurring isolated or in volleys, metallic and bell-like
- sounds, ticking, &amp;c., which, he says, revealed natural telluric
- phenomena. Sometimes these have been intolerably loud. At Vesuvius the
- vertical shocks corresponded with a sound like volleys of musketry,
- whilst the undulatory shocks gave the roaring. Some of these sounds
- could be imitated artificially by rubbing together the conducting wires
- in the same manner in which the rocks must rub against each other in
- an earthquake. Other sounds were imitated by placing the microphone
- on a vessel of boiling water, or by putting it on a marble slab and
- scratching and tapping the under side of it.</p>
-
- <p>These, then, are some of the more important results which have been
- arrived at by the study of microseismic motions. One point which seems
- worthy of attention is that they appear to be more law-abiding than
- their more violent relations, the earthquakes, and as phenomena in
- which natural laws are to be traced they are certainly deserving our
- attention. As to whether they will ever become the means of forewarning
- ourselves against earthquakes is yet problematical. Their systematic
- study, however, will enable us to trace the progress of a microseismic
- storm from point to point, and it is not impossible that we may yet
- be enabled to foretell where the storm may reach its climax as an
- earthquake. These, I believe, are the views of Professor di Rossi, who
- is at the present time engaged in the establishment of a system of
- microseismic observations throughout Italy.</p>
-
- <p>Before the earthquake of San Remo (Dec. 6, 1874) Rossi’s tromometer
- was in a state of agitation, and similar disturbances were observed at
- Livorno, Florence, and Bologna.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_324">324</span></p>
-
- <p>Since February 1883 I have observed a tromometer in Japan, and such
- results as have been obtained accord with results obtained in Italy.
- The increase in microseismical activity with a fall of the barometer
- is very marked. Other peculiarities in the behaviour of the instrument
- will be referred to under ‘Earth Pulsations.’</p>
-
- <p><em>Cause of microseismic movements.</em>—As to the cause of tromometric
- movements, we have a field for speculation. Possibly they may be
- due to slight vibratory motions produced in the soil by the bending
- and crackling of rocks produced by their rise upon the relief of
- atmospheric pressure. If this were so we should expect similar
- movements to be produced at the time of an increase of pressure. Rossi
- suggests that they may be the result of an increased escape of vapour
- from the molten materials beneath the crust of the earth, consequent
- upon a relief of pressure. The similarity of some of the sounds which
- are heard with the microphone to those produced by boiling water are
- suggestive of this, and Rossi quotes instances when underground noises
- like those which we should expect to hear from a boiling fluid have
- been heard before earthquakes without the aid of microphones. One
- instance was that of Viduari, a prisoner in Lima, who, two days before
- the shock of 1824, repeatedly predicted the same in consequence of the
- noises he heard.</p>
-
- <p>A possible cause of disturbances of this order may be small but
- sudden fluctuations in barometric pressure, which are visible during
- a storm. During a small typhoon on September 15, 1881, when in the
- Kurile Islands, I observed that the needle of an aneroid worked back
- and forth with a period of from one to three seconds. This continued
- for several hours. With every gust of wind the needle suddenly rose
- and then immediately fell. At times it trembled. These movements were
- observed in the open<span class="pagenum" id="Page_325">325</span>
- air. The extent of these sudden variations
- was approximately from ·03 to ·05 inches. Beckoning an increase of
- barometrical pressure of one hundredth of an inch as equivalent to a
- load of twenty million pounds on the square mile, during this storm
- there must have been the equivalent of loads of from 60 to 100 million
- pounds to the square mile continually placed on and removed from a
- considerable tract of the earth’s surface. If the period of application
- of these stresses approximately coincide with the natural vibrational
- period of the area affected, it would surely seem, especially when
- we reflect upon the effect of an ordinary carriage, that tremors of
- considerable magnitude ought to be produced.</p>
-
- <p>An inspection of the following few observations taken from my note-book
- for the same typhoon will suggest that even the large and slower
- variations are capable of producing tremulous motions.</p>
-
- <table summary="Typhoon barometer readings">
- <tr>
- <th>Time<br />h.&nbsp; m.</th>
- <th>Barometer<br />reading</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp; &nbsp; 12&nbsp; &nbsp;5 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span></td>
- <td class="tdc">29·02</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp; &nbsp; 12 10&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="tdc">29·05</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp; &nbsp; 12 12&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="tdc">29·07</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp; &nbsp; 12 13&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="tdc">29·05</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp; &nbsp; 12 25&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="tdc">29·10</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp; &nbsp; 12 50&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="tdc">29·00</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1 10&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="tdc">29·00</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1 20&nbsp; &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="tdc">29·07</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XX">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_326">326</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XX.<br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTH PULSATIONS.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Definition of an earth pulsation—Indications of
- pendulums—Indications of levels—Other phenomena indicating
- the existence of earth pulsations—Disturbances in lakes and
- oceans—Phenomena resultant on earth pulsations—Cause of earth
- pulsations.</div>
-
- <p class="noindent"><span class="smcap">The</span> object of the present chapter is to show that from time to time it
- is very probable that slow but large wave-like undulations travel over
- or disturb the surface of the globe.</p>
-
- <p>These movements, which have escaped our attention on account of their
- slowness in period, for want of another term I call earth pulsations.</p>
-
- <p>The existence of movements such as these may be indicated to us by
- changes in the level of bodies of water like seas and lakes, by the
- movements of delicate levels, by the displacement of the bob of a
- pendulum relatively to some point on the earth above which it hangs,
- and by other phenomena which will be enumerated.</p>
-
- <p><em>Indication of pendulums.</em>—Pendulums which have been suspended for the
- purposes of seismometrical observations have, both by observers in
- Italy and Japan, been seen to have moved a short distance out from, and
- then back to, their normal position.</p>
-
- <p>This motion has simply taken place on one side of their central
- position, and is not due to a swing. The
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_327">327</span> character of these records
- is such that we might imagine the soil on which the support of the
- pendulum had rested to have been slowly tilted, and slowly lowered.
- They are the most marked on those pendulums provided with an index
- writing a record of its motions on a smoked glass plate, which index is
- so arranged that it gives a multiplied representation of the relative
- motion between it and the earth. As motions of this sort might be
- possibly due to the action of moisture in the soil tilting the support
- of the pendulum, and to a variety of other accidental causes, we cannot
- insist on them as being certain indications that there are slow tips in
- the soil, but for the present allow them to remain as possible proof of
- such phenomena.</p>
-
- <p>Evidence of displacement of the vertical, which are more definite than
- the above, are those made by Bertelli, Rossi, Count Malvasia, and other
- Italian observers, who, whilst recording earth tremors, have spent so
- much time in watching the vibrations of stiles of delicate pendulums
- by means of microscopes. As a result of these observations we are
- told that the point about which the stile of a pendulum oscillates
- is variable. These displacements take place in various azimuths, and
- they appear to be connected with changes of the barometer. I have made
- similar observations in Japan.</p>
-
- <p>From this, and from the fact that it is found that a number of
- different pendulums differently situated on the same area give similar
- evidence of these movements, it would hardly seem that these phenomena
- could be attributed to causes like changes in temperature and moisture.
- M. S. di Rossi lays stress on this point, especially in connection with
- his microseismograph, where there are a number of pendulums of unequal
- length which give indications of a like character. The direction in
- which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_328">328</span>
- these tips of the soil take place—which phenomena are noticeable
- in seismic as well as microseismic motions—Rossi states are related to
- the direction of certain lines of faulting.</p>
-
- <p><em>Indications of levels.</em>—Bubbles of delicate levels can be easily seen
- to change their position with meteorological variations; but Rossi also
- tells us that they change their position, sometimes not to return for
- a long time, during a microseismic storm. Here again we have another
- phenomenon pointing to the fact that microseismic disturbances are the
- companions of slow alterations in level.</p>
-
- <p>One of the most patient observers of levels has been M. Plantamour,
- who commenced his observations in 1878, at Sécheron, on the Lake of
- Geneva. He used two levels, one placed north and south, and the other
- east and west. During the summer of 1878 the east end rose, but at the
- end of September a depression set in. The diurnal movements had their
- maximum and minimum at 6 and 7.45 <span class="smcap">a.m.</span> and <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> The
- total amplitude was 4·89″. The variations of the east and west level
- appeared to be due to the temperature, but the movements of the north
- and south level were dependent upon an unknown cause.</p>
-
- <p>Between October 1, 1879, and September 30, 1880, the east end fell
- rapidly, from the middle of November up to December 26, amounting to
- 88·71″. It then rose 6·55″ to January 5, and then fell again. On
- January 28 it reached 89·95″, after which it rose.</p>
-
- <p>Between October 4, 1879, and January 28, 1880, the movement was 95·8″,
- against 28·08″ of the previous year.</p>
-
- <p>These movements were not due alone to temperature. The north and south
- level, which was not influenced by<span class="pagenum" id="Page_329">329</span>
- the cold of the winter, moved
- 4·56″. In the previous year 4·89″.<a id="FNanchor_145" href="#Footnote_145" class="fnanchor">[145]</a></p>
-
- <p>From February 17 to June 5, 1883, the author observed in Tokio the
- bubbles of two delicate levels, one placed north and south, and the
- other east and west. They were placed under glass cases on the head of
- a stone column. The column, which is inside a brick building, rests
- on a concrete foundation, and is about ten years old. It is in no way
- connected with the building. The temperature of the room has a daily
- variation of about 1° Fahr.</p>
-
- <p>In both these levels diurnal changes are very marked. Occasionally they
- are enormously great. Thus, on March 25, the readings of the south end
- of the north south level were as follows:—</p>
-
- <table summary="Tokio level readings">
- <tr>
- <th>&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="left">Time<br />h.&nbsp; m.</th>
- <th>Readings.</th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>25th.</td>
- <td class="left">4 00 <span class="smcap">p.m.</span></td>
- <td class="left">104·5</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="left">4 &nbsp; 5 &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="left">103</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="left">4 10 &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="left">102</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="left">4 25 &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="left">101</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="left">4 30 &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="left">100</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="left">4 40 &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="left">&nbsp; 98</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="left">4 42 &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="left">&nbsp; 99·5</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="left">4 45 &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="left">100</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="left">4 50 &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="left">101</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="left">4 55 &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="left">101</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>&nbsp;</td>
- <td class="left">5 00 &nbsp;„</td>
- <td class="left">100</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>26th.</td>
- <td class="left">7 00 <span class="smcap">a.m.</span></td>
- <td class="left">105</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>Usually this level moves through about three divisions per day.</p>
-
- <p>From March 25 to May 4 it travelled from 98 to 127. Since then, to June
- 5, it has descended to 116. During this period the east west level
- has been <em>comparatively</em> quiet. One division of the north south level
- equals about 2″ of arc.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_330">330</span></p>
-
- <p>Many of these changes may be due to changes in temperature, variations
- in moisture, and other local actions. Some of them, however, are hardly
- explicable on such assumptions. The fact that the general direction in
- change of the vertical, as indicated by a tromometer standing on the
- same column with the levels, showed that the change which was taking
- place was rather in the column than in the instruments.</p>
-
- <p>The fact also that at the time of a barometrical depression a
- <em>pulse-like surge</em> can be seen in the levels, having a period averaging
- about three seconds and sometimes amounting to about one second of
- arc, is a phenomenon hardly to be attributed to sudden fluctuations in
- moisture or temperature, but indicates real changes in level.<a id="FNanchor_146" href="#Footnote_146" class="fnanchor">[146]</a></p>
-
- <p>In addition to variation in the bubbles of levels which come on more or
- less gradually, we have many recorded instances of <em>sudden</em> alterations
- taking place in these instruments.</p>
-
- <p>Examples of what may have been a slow oscillating motion of the earth’s
- crust are referred to by Mr. George Darwin in a Report to the British
- Association in 1882.</p>
-
- <p>One of them was made by M. Magnus Nyrén, at Pulkova, who, when engaged
- in levelling the axis of a telescope, observed spontaneous oscillation
- in the bulb of the level.</p>
-
- <p>This was on May 10 (April 28), 1877. The complete period was about
- 20 seconds, the amplitude being 1·5″ and 2″. One hour and fourteen
- minutes before this he observes that there had been a severe earthquake
- at Iquique, the distance to which in a straight line was 10,600
- kilomètres, and on an arc of a great circle, 12,500 kilomètres.
- On September 20 (8), in 1867, Mr. Wagner
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_331">331</span>had observed at Pulkova
- oscillations of 3″, seven minutes before which there had been an
- earthquake at Malta. On April 4 (March 23), 1868, an agitation of the
- level had been observed by Mr. Gromadzki, five minutes before which
- there had been an earthquake in Turkestan. Similar observations had
- been made twice before. These, however, had not been connected with any
- earthquakes—at least, Mr. Darwin remarks—with certainty.</p>
-
- <p><em>Phenomena analogous to the pendulum and level observations.</em>—As
- examples of phenomena which are analogous to those made on pendulums
- and levels, the following may be noticed. On March 20, 1881, at 9
- <span class="smcap">p.m.</span> a watchmaker in Buenos Ayres observed that all his
- clocks oscillating north and south suddenly began to increase their
- amplitude, until some of them became twice as great as before. Similar
- observations were made in all the other shops. No motion of the earth
- was detected. Subsequently it was learnt that this corresponded with an
- earthquake in Santiago and Mendoza.<a id="FNanchor_147" href="#Footnote_147" class="fnanchor">[147]</a></p>
-
- <p>Another remarkable example illustrating the like phenomena is furnished
- by the observations which were made on December 21, 1860, by means of a
- barometer in San Francisco, which oscillated, with periods of rest, for
- half an hour. No shock was felt, nor is it likely that it was a local
- accident, as it could not be produced artificially. On the following
- day, however, a violent earthquake was experienced at Santiago.<a id="FNanchor_148" href="#Footnote_148" class="fnanchor">[148]</a></p>
-
- <p>At the time or shortly after the great Lisbon earthquake, curious
- phenomena were observed in distant countries, which only appear to be
- explicable on the assumption of the existence of earth pulsations.</p>
-
- <p>Thus at Amsterdam and other towns, chandeliers in churches were
- observed to swing. At Haarlem water was
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_332">332</span>thrown over the sides of tubs,
- and it is expressly mentioned that no motion was perceived in the
- ground.</p>
-
- <p>At the Hague a tallow chandler was surprised at the clashing noise
- made by his candles, and this the more so because no motion was felt
- underfoot.</p>
-
- <p><em>Unusual disturbances in bodies of water.</em>—At the time of large
- earthquakes it would appear that earth pulsations are produced, which
- exhibit themselves in countries where the actual shaking of the
- earthquake is not felt, by disturbances in bodies of waters like lakes
- and seas.</p>
-
- <p>Some remarkable examples of these disturbances are to be found in the
- records of the great Lisbon earthquake. This earthquake, as a violent
- movement of the ground, was chiefly felt in Spain, Portugal, northern
- Italy, the south of France and Germany, northern Africa, Madeira, and
- other Atlantic islands. In other countries further distant, as, for
- instance, Great Britain, Holland, Scandinavia, and North America,
- although the records are numerous, the only phenomena which were
- particularly observed was the slow oscillations of the waters in lakes,
- ponds, canals, &amp;c. In some instances the observers especially remark
- that there was no motion in the soil.</p>
-
- <p>Pebley Dam, in Derbyshire, which is a large body of water covering
- some thirty acres, commenced to oscillate from the south. A canal near
- Godalming flowed eight feet over the walk on the north side.</p>
-
- <p>Coniston Water, in Cumberland, which is about five miles long,
- oscillated for about five minutes, rising a yard up its shores. Near
- Durham a pond, forty yards long and ten broad, rose and fell about one
- foot for six or seven minutes. There were four or five ebbs and flows
- per minute.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_333">333</span></p>
-
- <p>Loch Lomond rose and fell through about two and a half feet every
- five minutes, and all the other lochs in Scotland seem to have been
- similarly agitated.</p>
-
- <p>At Shirbrun Castle, in Oxfordshire, where the water in some moats and
- ponds was very carefully observed, it was noticed that the floods
- began gently, the velocity then increased, till at last with great
- impetuosity they reached their full height. Here the water remained for
- a little while, until the ebb commenced, at first gently, but finally
- with great rapidity. At two extremities of a moat about 100 yards long,
- it was found that the sinkings and risings were almost simultaneous.
- The motions in a pond a short distance from the moat were also
- observed, and it was found that the risings and sinkings of the two did
- not agree.</p>
-
- <p>During these motions there were several maxima.</p>
-
- <p>These few examples of the motions of waters, without any record of the
- motions of the ground, at the time of the Lisbon earthquake, must be
- taken as examples of a very large number of similar observations of
- which we have detailed accounts.</p>
-
- <p>Like agitations, it must also be remembered, were perceived in North
- America and in Scandinavia, and if the lakes of other distant countries
- had been provided with sufficiently delicate apparatus, it is not
- unlikely that similar disturbances would have been recorded.</p>
-
- <p>Besides these movements in the waters of seas and lakes, at or about
- the time of great earthquakes, we have records of like movements, which
- take place as independent phenomena.</p>
-
- <p>Thus we read that on October 22, 1755, the waters of Lake Ontario rose
- and fell five and a half feet several times in the course of half an
- hour.<a id="FNanchor_149" href="#Footnote_149" class="fnanchor">[149]</a> On March 31, 1761,
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_334">334</span>Loch Ness rose suddenly for the period
- of three-quarters of an hour.<a id="FNanchor_150" href="#Footnote_150" class="fnanchor">[150]</a></p>
-
- <p>As another example of the disturbance of water at the time of a great
- earthquake in districts where the earthquake was not felt, may be
- mentioned the swelling of the waters of the Marañon, in 1746, on the
- night when Callao was overwhelmed.</p>
-
- <p>Sudden variations in the level of the water have been many times
- observed in the North American lakes. The changes in level which
- sometimes take place in the Genfer and Boden lakes are supposed to have
- some relation to the condition of the atmosphere. A rising and falling
- of especial note took place on April 18, 1855.</p>
-
- <p>In Switzerland these sudden changes are known as ‘seiches’ or ‘rhussen.’</p>
-
- <p>From the observations and calculations of Prof. Forel it would seem
- that the period of the ‘seiches’ depends upon the dimensions of the
- lakes; the calculated periods dependent on the depths of the lakes
- being approximately equal to the observed periods.<a id="FNanchor_151" href="#Footnote_151" class="fnanchor">[151]</a></p>
-
- <p>W. T. Bingham, writing on the volcanoes of the Hawaiian Islands,
- remarks that it is not unusual for the sea to be agitated by great and
- unusual tides, and that such sea waves have not been attended with
- volcanic eruptions or seismic disturbances. Thus in May 1819 the tide
- rose and fell thirteen times. On November 7, 1837, there was an ebb and
- flow of eight feet every twenty-eight minutes. Again, on May 17, 1841,
- like phenomena, unaccompanied by any other unusual occurrences, were
- recorded.<a id="FNanchor_152" href="#Footnote_152" class="fnanchor">[152]</a></p>
-
- <p>Phenomena which may possibly hold a relationship to earth pulsations
- are the periodical swellings of the ocean on the coast of Peru. Dr. C.
- F. Winslow, who made a long <span class="pagenum" id="Page_335">335</span>
- period observation upon the coast of Peru,
- found ‘the highest tides to prevail at Callao and Paita in December
- and January,’ and ‘also a series of enormous waves or sea-swells to
- be thrown from time to time upon the coast, varying from twenty-four
- to twenty-seven hours in continuance, accompanied by unusual height
- of the tide during the same period.’ During June and July the ocean
- was unusually tranquil. These phenomena do not appear to be connected
- with great atmospheric storms, nor do they hold any relation to the
- prevailing wind. They increase with and accompany the swelling of the
- tides, and occur generally, but not always, about full moon.</p>
-
- <p>Sometimes they break suddenly upon the coast. ‘<em>They are annual and
- constant in their periodicity.</em>’</p>
-
- <p>The periodical swellings are most noticeable between Tumbez 3° S.L. and
- the Chincha Islands 14° S.L.</p>
-
- <p>These oceanic phenomena synchronise with the periodic intensity of
- earthquake phenomena in that part of the globe, and these with tidal
- movements.<a id="FNanchor_153" href="#Footnote_153" class="fnanchor">[153]</a></p>
-
- <p><em>Other phenomena possibly attributable to earth pulsations.</em>—If we
- assume that earth pulsations have an existence, these many phenomena
- which are otherwise difficult to understand meet with an explanation.
- The curious effects which were produced in the springs at Toplitz at
- the time of the Lisbon earthquake may have been due to a pulse-like
- wave. The flow of the principal spring was greatly increased. Before
- the increase it became turbid and at one time stopped. Subsequently it
- became clear and flowed as usual, but the water was hotter and more
- strongly mineralised. Sudden changes in the flow of underground waters
- which from time to time are observed may be attributed to like causes.
- Secondary earthquakes such as occurred after the Lisbon
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_336">336</span>earthquake,
- as for instance in Derbyshire, may have been produced by pulsations
- disturbing the equilibrium of ground in a critical state.</p>
-
- <p>The falling in of subterranean excavations is also possibly connected
- with these phenomena.</p>
-
- <p><em>Possible causes of earth pulsations.</em>—Mr. George Darwin, in a report
- to the British Association (1882), has shown that movements of
- considerable magnitude may occur in the earth’s crust in consequence of
- fluctuations in barometrical pressure. (A rise of the barometer over an
- area is equivalent to loading that area with a weight, in consequence
- of which it is depressed. When the barometer falls, the load is removed
- from the area, which, in virtue of its elasticity, rises to its
- original position. This fall and rise of the ground completes a single
- pulsation.)</p>
-
- <p>On the assumption that the earth has a rigidity like steel, Mr. Darwin
- calculates that if the barometer rises an inch over an area like
- Australia, the load is sufficient to sink that continent two or three
- inches.</p>
-
- <p>The tides which twice a day load our shores cause the land to rise and
- fall in a similar manner. On the shores of the Atlantic, Mr. Darwin
- has calculated that this rise and fall of the land may be as much as 5
- inches. By these risings and fallings of the land the inclination of
- the surface is so altered that the stile of a plummet suspended from a
- rigid support ought not always to hang over the same spot. There would
- be a deflection of the vertical.</p>
-
- <p>In short, calculations respecting the effects of loads of various
- descriptions, which we know are by natural operations continually
- being placed upon and removed from the surface of various areas of the
- earth’s surface, indicate that slow pulsatory movements of the earth’s
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_337">337</span>
- surface must be taking place, causing variations in inclination of one
- portion of the earth’s crust relatively to another.</p>
-
- <p>Although it is possible that phenomena like the surging of levels may
- be attributable to causes like these, we can hardly attribute the other
- phenomena to such agencies.</p>
-
- <p>Rather than seek an explanation from agencies exogenous to our earth,
- we might perhaps with advantage appeal to the endogenous phenomena of
- our planet. When the barometer falls, which we have shown corresponds
- to an upward motion of the earth’s crust, we know, from the results of
- experiments, that microseismic motions are particularly noticeable.</p>
-
- <p>As a pictorial illustration of what this really means, we may imagine
- ourselves to be residing on the loosely fitting lid of a large
- cauldron, the relief of the external pressure over which increases the
- activity of its internal ebullition—the jars attendant on which are
- gradually propagated from their endogenous source to the exterior of
- our planet. This travelling outwards would take place much in the same
- way that the vibrations consequent to the rattle and jar of a large
- factory slowly spread themselves farther and farther from the point
- where they were produced.</p>
-
- <p>Admitting an action of this description to take place, it would then
- follow that this extra liberation of gaseous material beneath the
- earth’s crust would result in an increased upward pressure from within,
- and a tendency on the part of the earth’s crust to elevation. If we
- accept this as an explanation of the increased activity of a tremor
- indicator, then such an instrument may be regarded as a barometer,
- measuring by its motions the variations in the internal pressure of our
- planet.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_338">338</span></p>
-
- <p>The relief of external pressure and the increase of internal pressure,
- it will be observed, both tend in the same direction—namely, to an
- elevation of the earth’s crust.</p>
-
- <p>This explanation of the increased activity of earth tremors, which
- has also been suggested by M. S. di Rossi, is here only advanced as a
- speculation, more probable perhaps than many others.</p>
-
- <p>We know how a mass of sulphur which has been fused in the presence of
- water in a closed boiler gives up in the form of steam the occluded
- moisture upon the relief of pressure. In a similar manner we see steam
- escaping from volcanic vents and cooling streams of lava. We also
- know how gas escapes from the pores and cavities in a seam of coal
- on the fall of the barometrical column. We also know that certain
- wells increase the height of their column under like conditions. The
- latter of these phenomena, resulting in an increase in the rate of
- drainage of an area by its tendency to render such an area of less
- weight, facilitates its rise. If we follow the views of Mr. Mallet in
- considering that the pressures exerted on the crust of our earth may in
- volcanic regions be roughly estimated by the height of a column of lava
- in the volcanoes of such districts, we see that in the neighbourhood of
- a volcano like Cotopaxi the upward pressures must be enormously great.
- Further, the phenomena of earthquakes and volcanoes indicate that these
- pressures are variable. Before a volcano bursts forth we should expect
- that there would be in its vicinity an upward bulging of the crust, and
- after its formation a fall. Further, it is not difficult to conjecture
- other possible means by which such pressures may obtain relief.</p>
-
- <p>Should these pressures then find relief without rupturing the
- surface, it is not difficult to imagine them as the
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_339">339</span> originators of
- vast pulsations which may be recorded on the surface of the earth as
- wave-like motions of slow period.</p>
-
- <p>As an explanation of the strange movements observed on seas and lakes,
- Kluge brings forward the following strange and remarkable theory. The
- oxygen of the air is magnetic, whilst water is diamagnetic and the
- earth magnetic: we have, therefore, in our seas and lakes a diamagnetic
- body lying between and being, consequently, repelled from two magnetic
- bodies. By variation in temperature, the balance of repulsions
- exerted by the air and the earth is destroyed. Thus, by an elevation
- of temperature the air expands and flows away from the heated area,
- where, in consequence, there is less oxygen. The result of this is,
- that the repulsion of the air upon the waters is less than that of the
- earth upon the waters, and the waters are in consequence raised up. By
- a falling of temperature the waters may be depressed, and by either
- of these actions waves may be produced without the intervention of
- earthquakes or earth pulsations.</p>
-
- <p>The more definite kinds of information which we have to bring forward,
- tending to prove the existence of earth pulsations, too slow in period
- to be experienced by ordinary observers, are those which appear to be
- resultant phenomena of great earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>The phenomena that we are certain of in connection with earth
- vibrations, whether these vibrations are produced artificially by
- explosions of dynamite in bore-holes, or whether they are produced
- naturally by earthquakes, are, first, that a disturbance as it dies out
- at a given point often shows in the diagrams obtained by seismographs a
- decrease in period; and, secondly, a similar decrease in the period of
- the disturbance takes place as the disturbance spreads.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_340">340</span></p>
-
- <p>As examples of these actions I will quote the following.</p>
-
- <p>The diagram of the disturbance of March 1, 1882, taken at Yokohama,
- shows that the vibrations at the commencement of the disturbance had a
- period of about three per second, near the middle of the disturbance
- the period is about 1·1, whilst near the end the period has decreased
- to ·46. That is to say, the backward and forward motion of the ground
- at the commencement of the earthquake was six times as great as it was
- near the end, when to make one complete oscillation it took between two
- and three seconds. Probably the period became still less, but was not
- recorded owing to the insensibility of the instruments to such slow
- motions.<a id="FNanchor_154" href="#Footnote_154" class="fnanchor">[154]</a></p>
-
- <p>We have not yet the means of comparing together diagrams of two or more
- earthquakes, one having been taken near to the origin, and the other
- at a distance. The only comparisons which I have been enabled to make
- have been those of diagrams taken of the same earthquake, one in Tokio
- and the other in Yokohama. As this base is only sixteen miles, and the
- earthquake may have originated at a distance of several hundreds of
- miles, comparisons like these can be of but little value.</p>
-
- <p>Other diagrams illustrating the same point are those obtained at three
- stations in a straight line, but at different distances from the
- origin of a disturbance produced by exploding a charge of dynamite in
- a bore-hole. A simple inspection of these diagrams shows that at the
- near station the disturbance consisted of backward and forward motions,
- which, as compared with the same disturbance as recorded at a more
- distant station, were very rapid. Further, by examining the diagram
- of the motions, <span class="pagenum" id="Page_341">341</span>
- say, at the near station, it is clearly evident that
- the period of the backward and forward motion rapidly decreased as the
- motion died out.</p>
-
- <p>These illustrations are given as examples out of a large series of
- other records, all showing like results.</p>
-
- <p>An observation which confirms the records obtained from seismographs
- respecting the increase in period of an earthquake as it dies out
- I have had opportunities of twice making with my levels. After all
- perceptible motion of the ground subsequent upon a moderately severe
- shock had died away, I have distinctly seen the bubble in one of these
- levels slowly pulsating with an irregular period of from one to five
- seconds.</p>
-
- <p>Although we must draw a distinction between earth waves and water
- waves, we yet see that in these points they present a striking
- likeness. Let us take, for example, any of the large earthquake waves
- which have originated off the coast of South America, and then radiated
- outwards, until they spread across the Pacific, to be recorded in Japan
- and other countries perhaps twenty-five hours afterwards, at a distance
- of nearly 9,000 miles from their origin. Near this origin they appeared
- as walls of water which were seen rapidly advancing towards the coast.
- These have been from twenty to two hundred feet in height, and they
- succeeded each other at rapid intervals, until finally they died out as
- a series of gentle waves. By the time these walls of water traversed
- the Pacific, to, let us say, Japan, they broadened out to a swell so
- flat that it could not be detected on the smoothest water excepting
- along shore lines where the water rose and fell like the tide. Instead
- of a wall of water sixty feet in height, we had long flat undulations
- perhaps eight feet in height, but with a distance from crest to crest
- of from one to two hundred miles.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_342">342</span></p>
-
- <p>If we turn to the effects of large earthquakes as exhibited on the
- land, I think that we shall find records of phenomena which are only
- to be explained on the assumption of an action having taken place
- analogous to that which takes place so often in the ocean, or an action
- similar to that exhibited by small earthquakes, and artificially
- produced disturbances, if greatly exaggerated.</p>
-
- <p>The only explanation for the phenomena accompanying the Lisbon
- earthquake appears to be that the short quick vibrations which had
- ruined so many cities in Portugal had, by the time that they had
- radiated to distant countries, gradually become changed into long flat
- waves having a period of perhaps several minutes. In countries like
- England these pulse-like movements were too gentle to be perceived,
- except in the effects produced by tipping up the beds of lakes and
- ponds.</p>
-
- <p>The phenomenon was not unlike that of a swell produced by a distant
- storm. It would seem possible that in some cases pulsations producing
- phenomena like the ‘seiches’ of Switzerland might have their origin
- beneath the ocean, or deep down beneath the earth’s crust. Perhaps,
- instead of commencing with the ‘snap and jar’ of an earthquake, they
- may commence as a heaving or sinking of a considerable area, which
- may be regarded as an uncompleted effort in the establishment of an
- earthquake or a volcano.</p>
-
- <p>From what has now been said it would seem that earth pulsations
- are phenomena with a real existence, and that some of these are
- attributable to earthquakes. On the other hand, certain earthquakes are
- attributable to earth pulsations. Some of the phenomena which have been
- brought forward have only a possible connection with these movements,
- and they yet require investigation.
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_343">343</span> Elastic tides in the earth’s
- crust have for long been realities in the minds of physicists. These,
- however, are due to lunar and solar influences, and are regular in
- their action. The tidal-like movements called pulsations are of greater
- magnitude, and their goings and comings are irregular.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="CHAPTER_XXI">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_344">344</span>
- <h2>CHAPTER XXI.<br />
- <span class="subhead">EARTH OSCILLATIONS.</span>
- </h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="summary">
- Evidences of oscillation—Examples of oscillation—Temple of Jupiter
- Serapis—Observations of Darwin—Causes of oscillation.</div>
-
- <p><em>Evidences of oscillation.</em>—By earth oscillations are meant those slow
- and quiet changes in the relative level of the sea and land which
- geologists speak of as elevations or subsidences. These movements are
- especially characteristic of volcanic and earthquake-shaken countries.</p>
-
- <p>As evidences of elevations we appeal to phenomena like raised beaches,
- sea-worn caves, raised coral reefs, and the remains of other dead
- organisms like barnacles, and the borings of lithodomous shells in and
- on the rocks of many coasts high above the level of the highest tides.
- As a proof that subsidence has taken place, there is the evidence
- afforded by submerged forests, the prolongation of certain valleys
- beneath the bed of the ocean, the formation of coral islands, the
- peculiar distribution of the plants and animals which we find in many
- countries, and the submergence of works of human construction. Inasmuch
- as these phenomena are discussed so fully in many treatises on physical
- geology, the references to them here will be made as brief as possible.
- Elevations and depressions which have taken place at the time of large
- earthquakes<span class="pagenum" id="Page_345">345</span>
- in a paroxysmal manner have already been mentioned. The
- movements referred to in this chapter, although generally taking place
- with extreme slowness, in certain instances, by an increase in their
- rapidity, have approached in character to earth pulsations. In most
- instances it would appear that the upward movement of the ground, which
- may be likened to a process of tumefaction, goes on so gently that it
- only becomes appreciable after the lapse of many generations.</p>
-
- <p><em>Examples of movements.</em>—Lyell estimated that the average rate of rise
- in Scandinavia has been about two and a half feet per century. At the
- North Cape the rise may have been as much as five or six feet per
- century. Observations made at the temple of Jupiter Serapis, between
- October 1822 and July 1838, showed that the ground was sinking at the
- rate of about one inch in four years. Since the Roman period, when this
- temple was built, the ground has sunk twenty feet below the waves. Now
- the floor of the temple is on the level of the sea. Lyell remarks that
- if we reflect on the dates of the principal oscillations at this place
- there appears to be connection between the movements of upheaval and a
- local development of volcanic heat, whilst periods of depression are
- concurrent with periods of volcanic quiescence.<a id="FNanchor_155" href="#Footnote_155" class="fnanchor">[155]</a></p>
-
- <p>As examples of movements even more rapid than those at the Temple of
- Jupiter Serapis we refer to an account of the earthquakes in Vallais
- (November 1755), when the ground about a mountain at a small distance
- from Brigue sank about a thumb’s-breadth every twenty-four hours. This
- took place between December 9 and February 26.<a id="FNanchor_156" href="#Footnote_156" class="fnanchor">[156]</a></p>
-
- <p>Another remarkable example of earth movement is
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_346">346</span>given in the account
- of the earthquake at Scarborough, on December 29, 1737, when the head
- of the spa water well was forced up in the air about ten yards high. At
- this time the sands on the shore are said to have risen so slowly that
- people came out to watch them.<a id="FNanchor_157" href="#Footnote_157" class="fnanchor">[157]</a></p>
-
- <p>Two other examples of rapid earth movement are taken from Professor
- Rossi’s ‘Meteorologia Endogena.’ Professor D. Seghetti, writing to
- Professor Rossi, says that a few lustres ago (one lustre = twenty
- years) Mount S. Giovanni hid the towns Jenne and Subiaco from each
- other. From Subiaco the church at Jenne is now visible, which a few
- years ago was invisible. The people at Jenne also can see more than
- formerly. The supposition is that the side of Mount S. Giovanni is
- lowered. This fact corresponds to a fact stated by Professor Carina,
- who says that forty or fifty years ago from Granaiola you could not see
- either the church of S. Maria Assunta di Citrone or the church of S.
- Pietro di Corsena. Now you can see both.<a id="FNanchor_158" href="#Footnote_158" class="fnanchor">[158]</a></p>
-
- <p>For a remarkable example illustrating the connection between seismic
- activity and elevation we are indebted to the patient labours of
- Darwin, who carefully investigated the evidences of elevation which
- are visible upon the western coasts of South America. These evidences,
- consisting of marks of erosion, caves, ancient beaches, sand dunes,
- terraces of gravel, &amp;c., were traced between latitudes 45° 35′ to 12°
- 5′, a distance north and south of 2,075 geographical miles, and there
- is but little doubt that they extend much farther. As deduced from
- observations upon upraised shells alone, a summary of Mr. Darwin’s
- observations are contained in the following table:—</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_347">347</span></p>
-
- <table summary="Darwin's observations">
- <tr>
- <th>&nbsp;</th>
- <th class="tdr"><div>Feet</div></th>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">At Chiloe the recent elevation has been</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>350</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;„&nbsp; Concepcion&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>625 to 1,000</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;„&nbsp; Valparaiso&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>1,300</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;„&nbsp; Coquimbo&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>252</div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdl">&nbsp;„&nbsp; Lima&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; „</td>
- <td class="tdr"><div>85</div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- <p>Shells, similar to those clinging to uplifted rocks, which are
- evidences of these elevations, still exist in the neighbouring seas,
- and in the same proportionate numbers as they are found in the upraised
- beds. In addition to this, Mr. Darwin shows us that at Lima, during the
- Indo-human period, the elevation has been at least eighty-five feet.
- At Valparaiso, during the last 220 years, the rise was about nineteen
- feet, and in the seventeen years subsequent to 1817 the rise has been
- ten or eleven feet, a portion only of which can be attributed to
- earthquakes. In 1834 the rise there was apparently still in progress.</p>
-
- <p>At Chiloe there has been a gradual elevation of about four feet in four
- years. These, together with numerous other examples, testify to the
- gradual but, as compared with other parts of the globe, exceedingly
- rapid rise of the ground upon the western shores of South America.<a id="FNanchor_159" href="#Footnote_159" class="fnanchor">[159]</a>
- The most important point to be noticed is that this district of rapid
- elevation is one of the most earthquake-shaken regions of the world.
- And further, judging from Darwin’s remarks, in those portions of it
- where the movements have been the most extensive, and at the same time
- probably the most rapid, the seismic disturbances appear to have been
- the most noticeable.</p>
-
- <p>Similar remarks may be applied to Japan, it being in those districts
- where evidences of recent elevation are abundant that earthquakes
- are numerous. Thus, in the bay of Yedo, where we have borings of
- lithodomi in the tufaceous cliffs ten feet above high-water mark,
- which, <span class="pagenum" id="Page_348">348</span>
- inasmuch as the rock in which they are found is soft and easily
- weathered, indicate an exceedingly rapid elevation, earthquakes are of
- common occurrence.</p>
-
- <p>From the evidences of elevation which we have upon the South American
- coast, Japan, and in other countries, it appears that these movements
- are intermittent, there being periods of rest, when sea cliffs are
- denuded, and perhaps even periods of subsidence. There is also evidence
- to show that, although these movements have been gradual from time to
- time, they have been aided by starts occasioned by earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p>As to whether earthquakes are more numerous during periods of
- elevation, or of subsidence, or during the intermediate periods of
- rest, we have no evidence.</p>
-
- <p>Sudden displacements which occasionally accompany earthquakes might, it
- was said, sometimes be regarded as the <em>cause</em> of an earthquake, and
- sometimes as the <em>effect</em>.</p>
-
- <p>The slow elevations here referred to may be looked upon as being one of
- the more important factors in the production of earthquakes. By various
- causes the rocky coast is bent until, having reached the limit of its
- elasticity, it snaps, and, in flying back like a broken spring, causes
- the jars and tremors of an earthquake.</p>
-
- <p>If this is the case, then the number of earthquakes felt in a district
- which is being elevated may possibly be a function of the rate of
- elevation.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="APPENDIX">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_349">349</span>
- <h2>APPENDIX.</h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/divider.png" width="80" height="9" alt="" />
- </div>
-
- <h3><span class="smcap">List of the Principal Books, Papers, Periodicals, which are
- referred to in the Preceding Pages.</span></h3>
-
- <hr class="r15" />
- <p class="hang1"><i>For a more complete bibliography of earthquakes refer to Mallet’s
- catalogue of works given in his report to the British Association
- in 1858.</i></p>
-
- <hr class="r15" />
- <p class="hang1">A True and Particular Relation of the Dreadful Earthquake which
- happened at Lima, &amp;c. (1746). 1768.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Abbot, Gen. H. L. On the Velocity of Transmission of Earth Waves.
- <cite>Am. Jour. Sci.</cite> XV., March 1878.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Shock of the Explosion at Hallet’s Point, Nov. 14, 1876.
- <i>Battalion Press.</i></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Alexander, Prof. T. See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">American Journal of Science.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Annali del reale osservatorio meteorologico Vesuviano.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Annual Register, The.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Anonymous, A Chronological and Historical Account of the most
- Memorable Earthquakes in the World, &amp;c. 1750.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— A Vindication of the Bishop of London’s Letter occasioned by the
- Late Earthquake. 1750.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Phenomena of the Great Earthquake of Nov. 1, 1755.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Serious Thoughts occasioned by the Late Earthquake at Lisbon.
- 1755.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Asiatic Society of Japan, Transactions of.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ayrton, Prof. W. E. <i>See</i> Perry, J.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Bárceno, M. Estudio del Terremoto (May 17, 1879) Mexico. 1879.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Beke, Dr. C. T. Mount Sinai a Volcano.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_350">350</span></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Bissett, Rev. J. A Sermon (on account of the Earthquake at Lisbon,
- Nov. 1, 1755). 1757.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Bittner, A. Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Erdbebens von Belluno vom
- 29. Juni 1873.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Sitzungsb. der K. Akad. d. Wissensch., lxix. II. Abth., 1874.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Bollettino del Vulcanismo Italiano.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Boué, Dr. A. Ueber das Erdbeben welches Mittel-Albanien im
- October d. J. so schrecklich getroffen hat. <cite>Die K. Akad. d.
- Wissenschaften</cite>, Nov. 1851.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Parallele der Erdbeben, des Nordlichtes und des Erdmagnetismus.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Ueber die Nothwendigkeit die Erdbeben und vulkanischen
- Erscheinungen genauer als bis jetzt beobachten zu lassen. <cite>Die K.
- Akad. d. Wissenschaften</cite>, 1851 and 1857.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Bouguer, M. Of the Volcanoes and Earthquakes in Peru.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">British Association, Reports of.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Brunton, R. H. Constructive Art in Japan. <cite>Trans. Asiatic Soc. of
- Japan</cite>, II. and III., Pt. 2.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Bryce, J. Report to British Association, 1841.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Buffour, M. The Natural History of Earthquakes and Volcanoes.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">C. H. A Physical Discussion of Earthquakes, &amp;c. 1693.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Canterbury, Thomas, Lord Archbishop of, The Theory and History of
- Earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Casariego, E. A. See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Cawley, G. Some Remarks on Construction in Brick and Wood, &amp;c.
- <cite>Trans. Asiatic Soc. of Japan</cite>, VI. Plate ii.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Chaplin, Prof. W. S. An Examination of the Earthquakes recorded
- at the Meteorological Observatory, Tokio. <cite>Trans. Asiatic Soc. of
- Japan</cite>, VI. Part ii.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Comptes Rendus.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Credner, H. Das Dippoldiswalder Erdbeben vom Oktober 1877.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Zeitschr. f. d. Naturwiss. f. Sachsen u. Thüringen.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Das Vogtländisch-erzgebirgische Erdbeben, 23. Nov. 1875.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Zeitschr. f. d. gesammt. Naturwissenschaften, xlviii., Oktober.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Dan, T. See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Darwin, Charles. Researches on Geology and Natural History.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Geological observations.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Darwin, G. H. Reports on Lunar Disturbance of Gravity to British
- Association, 1881. 1882.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_351">351</span></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Diffenbach, F. Plutonismus und Vulkanismus in der Periode von
- 1868–1872, und ihre Beziehungen zu den Erdbeben im Rheingebiet.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Doelter, C. von. Ueber die Eruptivgebilde von Fleims, nebst einigen
- Bemerkungen über den Bau älterer Vulcane.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— lxxiv. Band d. Sitzungsb. d. K. Akad. d. Wissensch., I. Abth.,
- Dec. Heft, Jahrg. 1876.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Doolittle, Rev. T. Earthquakes Explained and Practically Improved,
- &amp;c. 1693.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Doyle, P. See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Emerson, Prof., B.A. Review of Von Seebachs’ Earthquake of March 6,
- 1872. <cite>Am. Jour. Sci.</cite>, Series III.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ewing, Prof. J. A. Earthquake Measurement. A memoir published by
- the Tokio University. 1883.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Falb, R. Gedanken und Studien über den Vulkanismus, &amp;c. 1875.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Grundzüge zu einer Theorie der Erdbeben und Vulkanausbrüche.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Das Erdbeben von Belluno. ‘Sirius,’ Bd. VI., Heft ii.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Flamstead, J. A Letter concerning Earthquakes. 1693.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Forel, F. A. Les Tremblements de Terre (Suisse). <cite>Arch. des
- Sciences Physiques et Naturelles</cite>, VI. p. 461.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Tremblement de Terre du 30 Décembre 1879.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Fuchs, Karl. Vulkane und Erdbeben.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— <cite>Die Vulkanischen Erscheinungen der Erde.</cite></p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Garcia, J. C. See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Geinitz, Dr. E. Das Erdbeben von Iquique am 9. Mai 1877, &amp;c. <cite>Die
- K. Leop.-Carol.-Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher</cite>, Band xl., Nr. 9.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Gentleman’s Magazine, The.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Geographical Society, Proceedings of.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Geological Society, Proceedings of.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Girard, Dr. H. Ueber Erdbeben und Vulkane. 1845.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Gray, T. See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— On Instruments for Measuring and Recording Earthquake Motions.
- Phil. Mag. Sept. 1881.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— On Recent Earthquake Investigation. <cite>The Chrysanthemum</cite>, 1881.
- Guiscardi, Prof. G. Notizie del Vesuvio. 1857.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Il terremoto di Casamicciola del 4 Marzo. 1881.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_352">352</span></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Hales, S., D.D., F.R.S. Some Considerations on the Causes of
- Earthquakes. 1750.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Hamilton, Sir W. Observations on Mount Vesuvius, Mount Etna, &amp;c.
- 1774.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Hattori, I. Destructive Earthquakes in Japan. <cite>Trans. Asiatic Soc.
- of Japan</cite>, V. Plate i.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Heim, Prof. A. Les Tremblements de Terre et leur Etude
- Scientifique. 1880.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Prof. A. Die Schweizerischen Erdbeben in 1881–1882.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Hoeffer, Prof. H. Die Erdbeben Kärntens und deren Stosslinien. <cite>Die
- Kais. Akademie d. Wissenschaften</cite>, Band xlii.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Höfer, Prof. H. Das Erdbeben von Belluno, am 29. Juni 1873.
- <cite>Sitzungsb. der K. Akad. d. Wissensch.</cite>, I. Abth., Band lxxiv.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Hoff, K. E. A. von. Geschichte der durch Ueberlieferung
- nachgewiesenen natürlichen Veränderungen der Erdoberfläche. 1822.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Hooke, R., M.D., F.R.S. Discourses concerning Earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Hopkins, William. Report to the British Association on the
- Geological Theories of Elevation and Earthquakes. 1847.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Horton, Rev. Mr. An Account of the Earthquake which happened at
- Leghorn in Italy (Jan. 1742). 1750.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Humboldt, Alexander von. Cosmos.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Travels.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Jeitteles, L. A. Bericht über das Erdbeben am 15. Januar 1858.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Sitzungsberichte der mathem.-naturw. Classe d. K. Akad. d.
- Wissensch., xxxv. S. 511.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Judd, J. W., Prof. Volcanoes, What they Are and What they Teach.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Knipping, E. Verzeichniss von Erdbeben wahrgenommen in Tokio,
- &amp;c. <cite>Mitt. d. Deutsch. Gesellsch. für Natur- und Völkerkunde
- Ostasiens</cite>, Heft 14.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Lasaulx, A. von. Das Erdbeben von Herzogenrath am 22. October 1873.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Lemery, M. A Physico-Chemical Explanation of Subterranean Fires,
- Earthquakes, &amp;c.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Lescasse, M. J. Etude sur les Constructions Japonaises, &amp;c.
- <cite>Mémoires de la Société des Ingénieurs Civils</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Lister, M., M.D., F.R.S. Of the Nature of Earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Little, Rev. J. Conjectures on the Physical Causes of Earthquakes
- and Volcanoes. 1820.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_353">353</span></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Mallet, R. The Neapolitan Earthquake, Vol. II. <cite>Reports to the
- British Association</cite>, 1850, 1851, 1852, 1854, 1858, 1861.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Secondary Effects of the Earthquake of Cachar. <cite>Proc. Geolog.
- Soc.</cite>, 1872.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Dynamics of Earthquakes. <cite>Trans. Royal Irish Acad.</cite> 1846.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, David. Reports to British Association, 1841, 1843, 1844.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, John. See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— On Seismic Experiments (with T. Gray, B.Sc., F.R.S.E.) <cite>Trans.
- Royal Soc.</cite> 1882.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— On Seismic Experiments (with T. Gray, B.Sc., F.R.S.E.) <cite>Proc.
- Royal Soc.</cite> No. 217, 1881.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Earthquake Observations and Experiments in Japan (with T. Gray,
- B.Sc., F.R.S.E.) <cite>Phil. Mag.</cite>, Nov. 1881.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— On the Elasticity and Strength Constants of certain Rocks (with
- T. Gray, B.Sc., F.R.S.E.) <cite>Jour. Geolog. Soc.</cite>, 1882.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— A Visit to the Volcano of Oshima. <cite>Geolog. Mag.</cite>, Dec. 2, Vol.
- IV., pp. 193–197, 255.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— On the Form of Volcanoes. <cite>Geolog. Mag.</cite>, Dec. 2, Vol. V., and
- Dec. 2, Vol. VI.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Note upon the Cooling of the Earth, &amp;c. <cite>Geolog. Mag.</cite>, Dec. 2.,
- Vol. VII., p. 99.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Investigation of the Earthquake Phenomena of Japan. <cite>Rep. Brit.
- Assoc.</cite>, 1881 and 1882.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— A Large Crater. <cite>Popular Science Review.</cite></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— The Volcanoes of Japan (a series of Articles). <cite>Japan Gazette.</cite></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Earthquake Literature of Japan (a series of Articles). <cite>Japan Gazette.</cite></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— The Earthquake of Dec. 23, 1880. <cite>The Crysanthemum</cite>, 1881.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Earthquake Motion. <cite>The Crysanthemum</cite>, 1882.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Seismology in Japan. <cite>Nature</cite>, Oct. 1882.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Earth Movements. <cite>The Times</cite>, Oct. 12, 1882.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Mitchell, Rev. J. Conjectures Concerning the Cause and Observations
- upon the Phenomena of Earthquakes. 1760.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Mohr, Dr. F. Geschichte der Erde. 1875.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Naturkundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch Indie. 1875–1880.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Naumann, Dr. E. Ueber Erdbeben und Vulkanausbrüche in Japan. <cite>Mitt.
- d. Deutsch. Gesellsch. für Natur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens.</cite> Heft 15.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_354">354</span></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Noggerath, Dr. J. Die Erdbeben vom 29. Juli 1846 im Rheingebiet, &amp;c.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Die Erdbeben im Vispthale (1855).</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Die Erdbeben im Rheingebiet in den Jahren 1868, 1869, 1870.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Jahrgänge d. Verbandlungen d. Natur. Vereins für 1870. <cite>Rheinland
- u. Westphalen</cite>, xxvii.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Oldham, Dr. Secondary Effects of the Earthquake of Cachas. <cite>Proc.
- Geolog. Soc.</cite> 1872.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Thermal Springs of India. <cite>Memoirs of Geolog. Survey of India</cite>,
- XIX. Plate 2.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— A Catalogue of Indian Earthquakes. <cite>Memoirs of Geolog. Survey of
- India</cite>, XIX. Plate 3.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— The Cachas Earthquake. <cite>Memoirs of Geolog. Survey of India</cite>, XIX.
- Plate 1.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Palmer, Col. H. S. See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Palmieri, Prof. L., e Scacchi, A. Della Regione Volcanica del Monte
- Vulture, e del Tremuoto ivi avvenuto nel dì 14 Agosto 1851, 1852.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Annali del reale Osservatorio Meteorologico Vesuviano.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Il Vesuvio, il Terremoto d’ Isernia e l’eruzione sottomarina di
- Santorino. <cite>R. Accad. d. Sci. Fis. e Mat. di Napoli</cite>, iv. 1866.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Sul recente Terremoto di Corleone. <cite>R. Accad. d. Sci. Fis. e
- Mat.</cite>, v. 1876.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Il Terremoto di Scio del dì 4 Aprile. <cite>R. Accad. d. Sci. Fis. e
- Mat. di Napoli</cite>, v. 1881.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Sul Terremoto di Casamicciola del 4 Marzo 1881. <cite>R. Accad. d.
- Sci. Fis. e. Mat. di Napoli</cite>. 1881.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Paul, Prof. H. M. See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Perrey, Prof. A. Earthquake Catalogue and Memoirs. (For list see
- Mallet’s Report to British Association. 1858.)</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Perry, J., and W. E. Ayrton. On a Neglected Principle that may be
- Employed in Earthquake Measurement.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Philosophical Magazine.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Pickering, Rev. R. An Address to those who have either retired
- or intend to leave Town under the Imaginary Apprehension of the
- Approaching Shock of another Earthquake. 1750.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ray, J., F.R.S. A Summary of the Causes of the Alterations which
- have happened to the Face of the Earth.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_355">355</span></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Rockstroh, E. Informe de la Comision Científica del Instituto
- Nacional de Guatemala, nombrada por el Sr. Ministro de Instruccion
- Pública para el Estudio de los Fenómenos Volcánicos en el Lago de
- Ilopango. 1880.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Rockwood, Prof. C. G. Notes on Earthquakes. Annually in the <cite>Am.
- Jour. Sci.</cite></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Japanese Seismology. <cite>Am. Jour. Sci.</cite>, XXII. Dec. 1881.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Romaine, W. A Discourse occasioned by the Late Earthquake. 1755.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Rossi, Prof. M. S. di. Intorno all’ odierna fase dei Terremoti in
- Italia, e segnatamente sul Terremoto in Casamicciola del 4 Marzo
- 1881. <cite>Società Geografica Italiana.</cite> 1881.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— La Meteorologia Endogena, 2 vols.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Royal Society, Transactions of.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Scacchi, A. <i>See</i> Palmieri.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Schmidt, Dr. J. F. Untersuchungen über das Erdbeben am 15. Januar
- 1858.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Studien über Erdbeben. 1879.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Die Eruption des Vesuv (1855). 1856.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Scrope, G. P. Volcanoes.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Seebach. Das mittle Deutsche Erdbeben (1872). <cite>Mitt. der K.K.
- geograph. Gesellsch.</cite>, II. Jahrg., 2. Heft, 1873.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Serpieri, Prof. A. C. S. Nuove Osservazioni sul Terremoto avvenuto
- in Italia il 12 Marzo 1873. <cite>Istituto Lombardo.</cite> 1873.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Il Terremoto di Rimini della notte 17–18 Marzo 1875.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Documenti nuove e Riflessioni sul Terremoto della notte 17–18
- Marzo 1875. <cite>Meteorologia Italiana</cite>, iv. 1875.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Determinazione delle fasi e delle leggi del grande Terremoto
- avvenuto in Italia nella notte 17–18 Marzo 1875. <cite>Istituto
- Lombardo.</cite> 1875.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Dell’ influenza del Lume Solare sui Terremoti. <cite>Istituto
- Lombardo.</cite> 1882.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Sherlock, T., D.D. (Lord Bishop of London). A Letter on the
- occasion of the late Earthquakes. 1750.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Shower, Rev. J., D.D. Practical Reflections on the Earthquakes that
- have happened in Europe and America, &amp;c. 1750.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Stübel, A. (see Reiss, W.)</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Stukeley, Rev. W., M.D., F.R.S. The Philosophy of Earthquakes,
- Natural and Religious, &amp;c. Plates 1, 2, and 3. 1756.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Sturmius, J. C. A Methodical Account of Earthquakes.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_356">356</span></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Suess, E. Die Erdbeben Niederösterreiches. <cite>Die Kais. Akademie der
- Wissenschaften</cite>, Bd. xxxiii.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Die Erdbeben des südlichen Italiens. <cite>Die Kais. Akademie der
- Wissenschaften</cite>, Bd. xxxiv.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Volger, Dr. G. H. Untersuchungen über das Phänomen der Erdbeben.
- 1857.</p>
-
- <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Wagener, Dr. G. Bemerkungen über Erdbebenmesser und Vorschläge zu
- einem neuen Instrumente dieser Art. <cite>Mitt. d. Deutsch. Gesellsch.
- für Natur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens</cite>, Heft 15.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— See <cite>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</cite>.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Winchilsea, The Earl of. A True and Exact Relation of the late
- Prodigious Earthquake and Eruption of Mount Etna. 1669.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Woodward, J., M.D., F.R.S. Earthquake caused by some Accidental
- Obstruction of a Continual Subterranean Heat.</p>
-
-
- <h3><span class="smcap">Seismological Society Of Japan.</span></h3>
-
- <p class="center">The following are a list of the papers published by this Society:—</p>
-
- <h4>VOL. I.</h4>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, J. Seismic Science in Japan. 35 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ewing, J. A. New Form of Pendulum Seismograph. 6 pages, 3 plates.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Gray, T. Seismometer and Torsion Pendulum Seismograph. 8 pages, 2
- plates.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Mendenhall, T. C. Acceleration of Gravity at Tokio (abstract). 2
- pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Wagener, G., and E. Knipping. New Seismometer and Observations with
- same. 18 pages, 1 plate.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, J. Earthquake in Japan of Feb. 22, 1880. 116 pages, 5
- plates, 8 woodcuts.</p>
-
-
- <h4>VOL. II.</h4>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, J. Recent Earthquakes of Yeddo, Effects on Buildings, &amp;c. 38
- pages, 2 plates, and many tables.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Mendenhall, T. C. Gravity on Summit of Fujiyama (abstract). 2 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Paul, H. M. Earth Vibrations from Railroad Trains (abstract). 4
- pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ewing, J. A. Astatic Horizontal Lever Seismograph (abstract). 5
- pages, 1 plate.</p>
-
- <p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_357">357</span></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, J. Peruvian Earthquake of May, 9, 1877. 47 pages, 2 plates,
- tables. Constitution, Rules, Officers and Members of the Society,
- Dec., 1881.</p>
-
- <h4>VOL. III.</h4>
-
- <p class="hang1">Gray, T. Steady Points for Earthquake Measurements. 11 pages, 3
- plates.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, J. Experiments in Observational Seismology. 53 pages, 1
- plate, tables.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— The Great Earthquakes of Japan. 38 pages, 1 plate, many tables.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Perry, J. Theory of a Rocking Column. 4 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Knipping, E. Earthquake of July 25, 1880, with Dr. Wagener’s
- Seismometer. 4 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ewing, J. A. Earthquake Observation at three or more Stations, &amp;c.
- 4 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Records of three recent Earthquakes. 6 pages, 3 plates.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Earthquake of March 8, 1881. 8 pages, 1 plate.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, J. Horizontal and Vertical Motion in Earthquake of March 8,
- 1881. 8 pages, 3 plates.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Gray, T. Seismograph for Registering Vertical Motion. 3 pages, 1
- plate.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ewing, J. A. Seismometer for Vertical Motion. 3 pages, 1 plate.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Gray, T. Seismograph for Large Motions. 2 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— Compensating a Pendulum to make it Astatic. 3 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Palmer, H. S. Note on Earth Vibrations. 3 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Kuwabara, M. The Hot Springs of Atami. 2 pages.</p>
-
- <h4>VOL. IV.</h4>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, J. Distribution of Seismic Activity in Japan. 30 pages, 1
- plate.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Wada, T. Notes on Fujiyama. 7 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Casariego, E. Abella y. Earthquakes of Nueva Vizcaya in 1881. 23
- pages, 2 maps.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, J. Utilisation of Earth’s Internal Heat. 12 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ewing, J. A. Earthquake of March 11, 1882. 5 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Doyle, P. Note on an Indian Earthquake. 6 pages.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, J. Systematic Observation of Earthquakes. 31 pages, 5 plates.</p>
-
- <h4>VOL. V.</h4>
-
- <p class="hang1">Naumann, Dr. E. Notes on Secular Changes of Magnetic Declination in
- Japan, p. 1–18.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Casariego, Don E. Abella y. Monografía Geológica del Volcan de
- Albay ó El Máyon. p. 19–43.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_358">358</span></p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Garcia, Don J. Centeno y. Abstract of a Memoir on the Earthquakes
- on the Island of Luzon in 1880. p. 43–89.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ewing, Prof. J. A. Seismological Notes.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— A Duplex Pendulum Seismometer.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— The Suspension of a Horizontal Pendulum.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">— A Speed Governor for Seismograph Clocks, p. 89–95.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Dan, T., S.B. Notes on the Earthquake at Atami, in the Province of
- Idzu, on September 29, 1882. p. 95–105.</p>
-
- <h4>VOL. VI.</h4>
-
- <p class="hang1">Alexander, Prof. T. The Development of the Record given by a
- Bracket Machine.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Milne, J. Earth Pulsations.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ewing, J. A. Note on a Duplex Pendulum with a Single Bob.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Gergens, F. Note on an Iron Casting, Supposed to have been
- Disturbed whilst Cooling by an Earthquake.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">West, C. D. On a Parallel Motion Seismograph.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Ewing, J. A. Certain Methods of Astatic Suspension.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Alexander, T. Ball and Cup Seismometer.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Knipping, Messrs. Paul and. Report on a System for Earthquake
- Observation.</p>
-
- <p class="hang1">Catalogues of Earthquakes.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <div class="chapter" id="INDEX">
- <span class="pagenum" id="Page_359">359</span>
- <h2>INDEX.</h2>
- </div>
-
- <div class="figcenter">
- <img src="images/divider.png" width="80" height="9" alt="" />
- </div>
-
- <ul>
- <li>Abbadie, M. d’, on earth tremors, <a href="#Page_309">309</a></li>
- <li>Abbot, General H. L., on the transmission of vibrations, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li>
- <li>Abella, M., on the earthquake in the Philippines in 1881, <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li>
- <li>Activity, on seismic, <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li>
- <li>Aristotle, on the classification of earthquakes, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li>
- <li>Artificial earthquakes, experiments on, <a href="#Page_57">57</a></li>
- <li>— — intensity of, <a href="#Page_61">61</a></li>
- <li>Aurora, on the occurrence of, with earthquakes, <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li>
- <li>Ayrton and Perry, on the effect of soft foundations, <a href="#Page_130">130</a></li>
- <li>— — on the period of vibration of buildings, <a href="#Page_115">115</a></li>
- <li>— — on the principle of, <a href="#Page_31">31</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Barometer, effect of changes of, on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_266">266</a></li>
- <li>Bertelli, on aurora and earthquakes, <a href="#Page_265">265</a></li>
- <li>— on earth tremors, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li>
- <li>— on the normal tromometer of, <a href="#Page_317">317</a></li>
- <li>Bittner, A., on the buildings of Belluno, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li>
- <li>Bridges, on earthquake, <a href="#Page_140">140</a></li>
- <li>Brunton, R. H., on buildings in earthquake countries, <a href="#Page_123">123</a></li>
- <li>Buckle, on the history of civilisation, <a href="#Page_1">1</a></li>
- <li>Builders, interest of the study of earthquakes to, <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li>
- <li>Buildings, on cracks in, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a></li>
- <li>— the effect of earthquakes on, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
- <li>— on the irregular destruction of, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li>
- <li>— — effect on the end house in a row, <a href="#Page_112">112</a></li>
- <li>— — church of St. Augustin at Manilla, <a href="#Page_113">113</a></li>
- <li>— — relation of destruction of, to earthquake motion, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li>
- <li>— — protection of, <a href="#Page_143">143</a></li>
- <li>— — pitch of the roof of, <a href="#Page_110">110</a></li>
- <li>— — position of openings in the walls of, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></li>
- <li>— — swing of, <a href="#Page_115">115</a></li>
- <li>— — period of vibration of, <a href="#Page_115">115</a></li>
- <li>— — principle of relative periods in, <a href="#Page_116">116</a></li>
- <li>— — types of, for earthquake countries, <a href="#Page_121">121</a></li>
- <li>— — effect of underlying rocks on, <a href="#Page_130">130</a></li>
- <li>— general conclusions regarding, <a href="#Page_144">144</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Cacciatore, definition of the, <a href="#Page_18">18</a></li>
- <li>Caldcleugh, A., on earthquake frequency, <a href="#Page_245">245</a></li>
- <li>— on barometric height and earthquakes, <a href="#Page_266">266</a></li>
- <li>Carruthers, J., on earthquakes and tides, <a href="#Page_291">291</a></li>
- <li>Centrum, definition of, <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li>
- <li>— on the depth of, <a href="#Page_213">213</a></li>
- <li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_360">360</span>— on the maximum depth of, <a href="#Page_218">218</a></li>
- <li>Centrum, determination of position of, <i>see</i> origins</li>
- <li>Chaplin, W. S., on the bracket seismometer of, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li>
- <li>— on earthquakes and the position of the moon, <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li>
- <li>Coast line, on the movement of, <a href="#Page_160">160</a></li>
- <li>Cocks, R., on earthquakes and tides, <a href="#Page_290">290</a></li>
- <li>Coseismic lines, definition of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
- <li>Curves, on microseismic, <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Darwin, Charles, on the movement of coast lines, <a href="#Page_160">160</a></li>
- <li>— George H., on earth tides, <a href="#Page_285">285</a></li>
- <li>— on tidal loads, <a href="#Page_291">291</a></li>
- <li>— on earth pulsation, <a href="#Page_330">330</a></li>
- <li>— on the effect of fluctuations of barometric pressure, <a href="#Page_336">336</a></li>
- <li>— experiments at Cambridge, <a href="#Page_310">310</a></li>
- <li>Delauney, M. J., on the influence of the planets on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_261">261</a></li>
- <li>Diagonic, definition of, <a href="#Page_11">11</a></li>
- <li>Diastrophic, definition of, <a href="#Page_11">11</a></li>
- <li>Direction of motion, from instrumental records, <a href="#Page_198">198</a></li>
- <li>Distribution, on earthquake, <a href="#Page_226">226</a></li>
- <li>— examples of, <a href="#Page_231">231</a></li>
- <li>Disturbance, on the propagation of, <a href="#Page_50">50</a></li>
- <li>Douglas, J., on South American houses, <a href="#Page_126">126</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Earth particle, on the velocity and acceleration of, <a href="#Page_79">79</a></li>
- <li>Earthquake motion, nature of, as deduced from the feelings, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li>
- <li>— direction of, derived from instrumental records, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></li>
- <li>— duration of, <a href="#Page_71">71</a></li>
- <li>— period of vibration in, <a href="#Page_74">74</a></li>
- <li>— examples of extent of, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>–<a href="#Page_77">77</a></li>
- <li>— absolute intensity of force in, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li>
- <li>— radiation of, <a href="#Page_85">85</a></li>
- <li>— velocity of propagation of, <a href="#Page_87">87</a></li>
- <li>Earthquake at Lisbon, velocity of propagation of, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li>
- <li>Earthquakes, general examples of effects of, <a href="#Page_142">142</a></li>
- <li>— geological changes produced by, <a href="#Page_161">161</a></li>
- <li>— hunting, <a href="#Page_187">187</a></li>
- <li>— distribution of, <a href="#Page_226">226</a></li>
- <li>— maps, <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li>
- <li>— secondary, <a href="#Page_248">248</a></li>
- <li>— table of, for nineteenth century, <a href="#Page_259">259</a></li>
- <li>— on the course of, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>–<a href="#Page_281">281</a></li>
- <li>— and tides, <a href="#Page_290">290</a></li>
- <li>— prediction of, <a href="#Page_297">297</a>–<a href="#Page_304">304</a></li>
- <li>Elastic waves, nature of, <a href="#Page_44">44</a></li>
- <li>Emergence, angle of, <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li>
- <li>Energy, dissipation of, in earthquakes, <a href="#Page_52">52</a></li>
- <li>— seismic, in relation to geological time, <a href="#Page_234">234</a></li>
- <li>— — table of, <a href="#Page_240">240</a></li>
- <li>Epicentrum, definition of, <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li>
- <li>Euthutropic, definition of, <a href="#Page_11">11</a></li>
- <li>Ewing, J. A., pendulum seismograph of, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></li>
- <li>— astatic pendulum of, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
- <li>— bracket seismograph of, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Falb, R., on the influence of the sun and moon on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_286">286</a></li>
- <li>Fissures, on the material discharged from, <a href="#Page_148">148</a></li>
- <li>— on the explanation of, <a href="#Page_151">151</a></li>
- <li>Focal cavity, definition of, <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li>
- <li>— on the form of, <a href="#Page_221">221</a></li>
- <li>Forbes, D., on an earthquake in Mendoza, <a href="#Page_151">151</a></li>
- <li>Frequency of earthquakes, <a href="#Page_243">243</a></li>
- <li>Frere, Sir H. Bartle, on geological changes produced by earthquakes, <a href="#Page_161">161</a></li>
- <li>Fuchs, on sea waves, <a href="#Page_176">176</a></li>
- <li>— on the movement of the seismic centre, <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li>
- <li>— on earthquakes and volcanic outbursts, <a href="#Page_271">271</a></li>
- <li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_361">361</span>— on hot springs, <a href="#Page_157">157</a></li>
- <li>Fumaroles, the effect of earthquakes on, <a href="#Page_156">156</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Geinitz, Dr., on sea waves, <a href="#Page_182">182</a></li>
- <li>Geologists, on the interest of seismology to, <a href="#Page_2">2</a></li>
- <li>Gray, T., astatic pendulum of, <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li>
- <li>— bracket seismometer of, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li>
- <li>— conical pendulum of, <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li>
- <li>— dead heat pendulum of, <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li>
- <li>— on the rotation of bodies, <a href="#Page_196">196</a></li>
- <li>— rolling spheres and cylinders of, <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li>
- <li>— torsion pendulum seismometer of, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></li>
- <li>— vertical motion seismometers of, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a></li>
- <li>— and Milne, seismograph of, <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Hattori, I., on the large earthquakes of Japan, <a href="#Page_244">244</a></li>
- <li>Haughton, Prof., list of active volcanoes of, <a href="#Page_227">227</a></li>
- <li>— method of finding earthquake origins of, <a href="#Page_209">209</a></li>
- <li>Hills, on the want of support on the face of, <a href="#Page_136">136</a></li>
- <li>Höfer, on an earthquake at Belluno, <a href="#Page_225">225</a></li>
- <li>Hoffmann, F., on the barometer and earthquakes, <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li>
- <li>Hooke, on earthquake motion, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li>
- <li>Hopkins, on the thickness of the earth’s crust, <a href="#Page_284">284</a></li>
- <li>Humboldt, on meteors and earthquakes, <a href="#Page_261">261</a></li>
- <li>— on the barometer and earthquakes, <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li>
- <li>— on volcanoes and earthquakes, <a href="#Page_279">279</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Imagination, effect of earthquakes on the, <a href="#Page_2">2</a></li>
- <li>Instruments, direction of motion derived from, <a href="#Page_198">198</a></li>
- <li>Intensity, on earthquake, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a></li>
- <li>— seismic curve of, for Kioto, <a href="#Page_242">242</a></li>
- <li>Isoseismic circles, definition of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
- <li>— areas, definition of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Kluge, on sea waves, <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li>
- <li>— on earthquake frequency, <a href="#Page_246">246</a></li>
- <li>— on simultaneous earthquakes, <a href="#Page_248">248</a></li>
- <li>— on earthquakes and sun spots, <a href="#Page_263">263</a></li>
- <li>— on earth pulsations, <a href="#Page_339">339</a></li>
- <li>Kreil, pendulum seismometer of, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Lakes, on disturbances in, <a href="#Page_154">154</a></li>
- <li>Land, effect of earthquakes on, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>–<a href="#Page_162">162</a></li>
- <li>— on the reason of movements of, <a href="#Page_162">162</a></li>
- <li>— on cracks and fissures formed in, <a href="#Page_146">146</a></li>
- <li>Level, on the use of for earth pulsations, <a href="#Page_328">328</a></li>
- <li>Literature, on seismic, <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li>
- <li>— on Japanese earthquake, <a href="#Page_7">7</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Mallet, R., on area of disturbance as a test of seismic energy, <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li>
- <li>— on clock stopping, <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li>
- <li>— list of works on earthquakes of, <a href="#Page_5">5</a></li>
- <li>— curve of seismic energy of, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li>
- <li>— definition of earthquake of, <a href="#Page_43">43</a></li>
- <li>— on earthquake frequency, <a href="#Page_243">243</a></li>
- <li>— on the influence of the heavenly bodies on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li>
- <li>— on maximum depth of origin, <a href="#Page_218">218</a></li>
- <li>— on pendulum seismometers, <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li>
- <li>— projection seismometer of, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></li>
- <li>— on the Neapolitan earthquake, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="#Page_280">280</a></li>
- <li>— on sea waves, <a href="#Page_170">170</a></li>
- <li>— on the swing of mountains, <a href="#Page_135">135</a></li>
- <li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_362">362</span>— on propagation from a fissure, <a href="#Page_217">217</a></li>
- <li>Mallet on the temperature of focal cavity, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li>
- <li>Malvasia, M. le Conte, on earth tremors, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li>
- <li>Martin, D. S., on the New England earthquake of 1874, <a href="#Page_142">142</a></li>
- <li>Meizoseismic area, definition of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
- <li>Melzi, on curves of microseismic motion, <a href="#Page_322">322</a></li>
- <li>Meteors, on earthquakes and, <a href="#Page_260">260</a></li>
- <li>Microseismic movements, on cause of, <a href="#Page_324">324</a></li>
- <li>Milne, D., on the Lisbon earthquake, <a href="#Page_87">87</a></li>
- <li>— on earthquake synchronism, <a href="#Page_247">247</a></li>
- <li>Mitchell, on earthquake motion, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li>
- <li>Moon, effect of, on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, <a href="#Page_285">285</a></li>
- <li>Mountains, on the swing of, <a href="#Page_135">135</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Naumann, E., on meteors and earthquakes, <a href="#Page_261">261</a></li>
- <li>— on sun spots and earthquakes, <a href="#Page_263">263</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Ocean, on disturbances in, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>–<a href="#Page_186">186</a></li>
- <li>Origin, definition of, <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li>
- <li>— on the determination of, <a href="#Page_187">187</a></li>
- <li>— position of, deduced from direction of motion, <a href="#Page_192">192</a></li>
- <li>— — from destruction of buildings, <a href="#Page_194">194</a></li>
- <li>— — from rotation of bodies, <a href="#Page_195">195</a></li>
- <li>— — from time of occurrence, <a href="#Page_199">199</a></li>
- <li>— — examples of methods of calculating, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>–<a href="#Page_212">212</a></li>
- <li>Oscillations, on earth, <a href="#Page_344">344</a></li>
- <li>Overturning moment, on the area of greatest, <a href="#Page_53">53</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Palmer, Col. H. S., on earth tremors, <a href="#Page_307">307</a></li>
- <li>Palmieri, on clock stopping, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li>
- <li>Paul, H. M., on earth tremors, <a href="#Page_308">308</a></li>
- <li>Perrey, A., on the influence of the moon on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_251">251</a></li>
- <li>Perrey on the periodicity of earthquakes, <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li>
- <li>Perry, J., on position of openings in walls, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></li>
- <li>Physicists, on the interest of earthquakes to, <a href="#Page_2">2</a></li>
- <li>Planets, influence of, on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_260">260</a></li>
- <li>Plantamour, M., on earth pulsations, <a href="#Page_328">328</a></li>
- <li>Pleistoseists, definition of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
- <li>Poly, M. A., on earthquakes and sun spots, <a href="#Page_263">263</a></li>
- <li>— on earthquakes and revolving storms, <a href="#Page_294">294</a></li>
- <li>Prost, M. le Baron, on earth tremors, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li>
- <li>Pulsation, on earth, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_326">326</a>–<a href="#Page_343">343</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Records, on receivers of, <a href="#Page_33">33</a></li>
- <li>Rivers, on disturbances in, <a href="#Page_154">154</a></li>
- <li>Rockwood, Prof., on American earthquakes, <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li>
- <li>Ronaldson, T., on San Francisco houses, <a href="#Page_129">129</a></li>
- <li>Rossi, M. S. di, on an eruption of gas in the Tiber, <a href="#Page_153">153</a></li>
- <li>— aurora and earthquakes, <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li>
- <li>— earth tremors, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li>
- <li>— earth oscillations, <a href="#Page_346">346</a></li>
- <li>— earth pulsations, <a href="#Page_327">327</a></li>
- <li>— microseismograph of, <a href="#Page_318">318</a></li>
- <li>— microphonic observations of, <a href="#Page_319">319</a>, <a href="#Page_323">323</a></li>
- <li>— normal tromometer of, <a href="#Page_317">317</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Schmidt, on the influence of barometric pressure on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li>
- <li>Sea waves, on nature of, <a href="#Page_165">165</a></li>
- <li>— on cause of, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li>
- <li>— seldom produced by earthquakes which originate inland, <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li>
- <li>— on velocity of propagation of, <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li>
- <li>— examples of, <a href="#Page_179">179</a></li>
- <li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_363">363</span>Seasons, frequency of earthquakes at different, <a href="#Page_254">254</a></li>
- <li>Seebach, on the determination of origins, <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li>
- <li>— on the focal cavity, <a href="#Page_224">224</a></li>
- <li>Seismic vertical, definition of, <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li>
- <li>Seismic and volcanic phenomena, relation of, <a href="#Page_270">270</a></li>
- <li>— — conclusions regarding, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>, <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li>
- <li>Seismology, definition of, <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li>
- <li>Seismometers, on various forms of, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>–<a href="#Page_40">40</a></li>
- <li>Seismoscopes, on various forms of, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>–<a href="#Page_20">20</a></li>
- <li>Serpieri, P. A., on distribution of seismic movement, <a href="#Page_231">231</a></li>
- <li>Shadows, on earthquake, <a href="#Page_137">137</a></li>
- <li>Spring, on frequency of earthquakes during, <a href="#Page_156">156</a></li>
- <li>Stukeley, on earthquake motion, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li>
- <li>— earthquakes and aurora, <a href="#Page_265">265</a></li>
- <li>Succussatore, definition of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
- <li>Sun, on the effect of, on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_253">253</a>, <a href="#Page_285">285</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Temperature, effect of changes of, on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>, <a href="#Page_294">294</a></li>
- <li>Terremoto, definition of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
- <li>Thomson, Sir W., on the rigidity of the earth, <a href="#Page_285">285</a></li>
- <li>Time, on recording apparatus for, <a href="#Page_35">35</a></li>
- <li>Travagini, F., on earthquake motion, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li>
- <li>Trembelores, definition of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
- <li>Tremors, on earth, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_306">306</a>–<a href="#Page_325">325</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Understanding, effects of earthquakes on, <a href="#Page_2">2</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Verbeck, on the ball and plate seismometer of, <a href="#Page_31">31</a></li>
- <li>Vibration, on the nature of earthquake, <a href="#Page_12">12</a></li>
- <li>Vorticose motion, on, <a href="#Page_70">70</a></li>
- <li>— definition of, <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Wagener, on the pendulum seismometer of, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></li>
- <li>— vertical motion seismometer of, <a href="#Page_33">33</a></li>
- <li>— list of earthquakes, <a href="#Page_76">76</a></li>
- <li>Wave paths, definition of, <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li>
- <li>Waves, on the nature of earthquake, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></li>
- <li>— on the interference of, <a href="#Page_138">138</a></li>
- <li>Wells, on the effect of earthquakes on, <a href="#Page_156">156</a></li>
- <li>Wenthrop, on the New Zealand earthquake of 1855, <a href="#Page_79">79</a></li>
- <li>West, on the parallel motion seismometer of, <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li>
- <li>Winslow, on pulsations of the ocean, <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li>
- <li>Wolf, R., on earthquakes and sun spots, <a href="#Page_263">263</a></li>
- <li>Woodward, on earthquake motion, <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Young, Dr. T., on earthquake motion, <a href="#Page_43">43</a></li>
- <li>&nbsp;</li>
- <li>Zantedeschi, M. F., on the influence of the sun and moon on earthquakes, <a href="#Page_285">285</a></li>
- <li>Zöllner, on the bracket seismometer of, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li>
- <li>— on earth tremors, <a href="#Page_309">309</a></li>
- </ul>
-
- <hr class="page" />
-
- <div class="footnotes">
- <div class="footheader"><b>Footnotes:</b></div>
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a>
- <i>Mémoires de l’Académie Imp. de Dijon</i>, vols. xiv. and xv., 2nd Series, 1855–56.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a>
- <i>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</i>, vol. iii. p. 65.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a>
- <i>Gentleman’s Magazine</i>, 1753.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_4" href="#FNanchor_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></a>
- 1 Kings xix. 11, 12.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_5" href="#FNanchor_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a>
- ‘Notes on the Great Earthquake of Japan.’ J. Milne, <i>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</i>, vol. iii.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_6" href="#FNanchor_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a>
- See Mallet’s List of Works on Earthquakes, <i>Report of the British Association</i>, 1858, p. 107.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_7" href="#FNanchor_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a>
- <i>Quarterly Review</i>, vol. lxiii. p. 61.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_8" href="#FNanchor_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a>
- <i>De Mundo</i>, c. iv.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_9" href="#FNanchor_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a>
- See <i>Phil. Trans. R. S.</i>, Part III. 1882.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_10" href="#FNanchor_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a>
- <i>Report of the British Association</i>, 1851.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_11" href="#FNanchor_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a>
- ‘On the Velocity of Transmission of Earth Waves,’ by General H. L, Abbot, <i>American, Journal of Science
- and Arts</i>, vol. xv. March 1878; ‘Shock of the Explosion at Hallet’s Point,’ by Bvt. Brig.-Gen. Henry
- L. Abbot, read before the Essayons Club of the Corps of Engineers, Nov. 1876.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_12" href="#FNanchor_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a>
- <i>West. Rev.</i>, July 1849.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_13" href="#FNanchor_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i>, L., 1755.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_14" href="#FNanchor_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a>
- The solution is taken from Mallet’s <i>Account of the Neapolitan Earthquake</i>, vol. i. p. 155.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_15" href="#FNanchor_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a>
- <i>Neapolitan Earthquake</i>, ii. p. 300.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_16" href="#FNanchor_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></a>
- See <i>Edinburgh Phil. Trans.</i>, vol. xxxi.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_17" href="#FNanchor_17"><span class="label">[17]</span></a>
- See <i>Report of British Association</i>, 1858, p. 10.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_18" href="#FNanchor_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a>
- <i>Meteorologia Endogena</i>, i. p. 306.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_19" href="#FNanchor_19"><span class="label">[19]</span></a>
- See remarks on the Earthquake ‘Push,’ p. 162.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_20" href="#FNanchor_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a>
- See <i>Researches in Geology and Natural History</i>, p. 374.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_21" href="#FNanchor_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a>
- ‘The City of Earthquakes,’ H. D. Warner, <i>Atlantic Monthly</i>, March, 1883.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_22" href="#FNanchor_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a>
- Mallet, <i>Dynamics of Earthquakes</i>.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_23" href="#FNanchor_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a>
- Stud Mill at Haywards.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_24" href="#FNanchor_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a>
- See ‘Constructive Art in Japan,’ by R. H. Brunton, C.E., F.R.G.S., F.G.S.,
- <i>Transactions of Asiatic Society of Japan</i>, December 22, 1873, and January 13, 1875.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_25" href="#FNanchor_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a>
- <i>Journal of the American Geographical Society</i>, vol. x.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_26" href="#FNanchor_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i>, li. 1760.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_27" href="#FNanchor_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a>
- <i>Ibid.</i>, xviii.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_28" href="#FNanchor_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a>
- ‘The City of Earthquakes,’ H. D. Warner, <i>Atlantic Monthly</i>, March 1883.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_29" href="#FNanchor_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a>
- T. Ronaldson, <i>A Treatise on Earthquake Dangers &amp;c.</i>
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_30" href="#FNanchor_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a>
- <i>Principles of Geology</i>, Lyell, vol. ii. p. 106.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_31" href="#FNanchor_31"><span class="label">[31]</span></a>
- <i>The Neapolitan Earthquake of 1857</i>, R. Mallet, vol. ii. p. 359.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_32" href="#FNanchor_32"><span class="label">[32]</span></a>
- <i>Am. J. Sci.</i> x. 191.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_33" href="#FNanchor_33"><span class="label">[33]</span></a>
- <i>Am. J. Sci.</i> x. 191.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_34" href="#FNanchor_34"><span class="label">[34]</span></a>
- <i>Reports of British Association</i>, 1858, p. 106.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_35" href="#FNanchor_35"><span class="label">[35]</span></a>
- See chapter ‘Causes of Earthquakes’ for details of this myth.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_36" href="#FNanchor_36"><span class="label">[36]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vol. x. p. 191.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_37" href="#FNanchor_37"><span class="label">[37]</span></a>
- <i>The Earth</i>, p. 599.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_38" href="#FNanchor_38"><span class="label">[38]</span></a>
- Lyell, <i>Principles of Geology</i>, vol. ii. chap. xxix.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_39" href="#FNanchor_39"><span class="label">[39]</span></a>
- <i>Gent. Mag.</i> vol. xx. p. 212.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_40" href="#FNanchor_40"><span class="label">[40]</span></a>
- <i>Trans. Seis. Soc.</i> vol. v. p. 67–68.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_41" href="#FNanchor_41"><span class="label">[41]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vol. iv.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_42" href="#FNanchor_42"><span class="label">[42]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. xviii.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_43" href="#FNanchor_43"><span class="label">[43]</span></a>
- Oldham and Mallet, ‘Cachar Earthquake,’ <i>Proc. Geolog. Soc.</i> 1872.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_44" href="#FNanchor_44"><span class="label">[44]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vols. li. and xviii.; <i>Gent. Mag.</i> vol.
- xx. 212.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_45" href="#FNanchor_45"><span class="label">[45]</span></a>
- <i>Trans. Royal Geog. Soc.</i> vol. vi.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_46" href="#FNanchor_46"><span class="label">[46]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vols. xxxvi. and xxxix.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_47" href="#FNanchor_47"><span class="label">[47]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. of Sci.</i> 1865, vol. xl. p. 365.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_48" href="#FNanchor_48"><span class="label">[48]</span></a>
- <i>Proc. Geolog. Soc. Ap.</i> 1875, p. 270.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_49" href="#FNanchor_49"><span class="label">[49]</span></a>
- <i>Gent. Mag.</i> vol. xxi. p. 569.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_50" href="#FNanchor_50"><span class="label">[50]</span></a>
- <i>Jahrb. f. Min.</i> 1840, p. 173.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_51" href="#FNanchor_51"><span class="label">[51]</span></a>
- Oldham and Mallet, ‘Cachar Earthquake,’ <i>Trans. Geolog.
- Soc. Ap.</i> 1872.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_52" href="#FNanchor_52"><span class="label">[52]</span></a>
- O. Volger, <i>Unters üb. d. Phän. d. Erdb.</i> vol. iii. p.
- 414.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_53" href="#FNanchor_53"><span class="label">[53]</span></a>
- <i>Meteorologia Endogena</i>, vol. i. p. 166.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_54" href="#FNanchor_54"><span class="label">[54]</span></a>
- <i>Gent. Mag.</i> vol. xxvi. p. 91.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_55" href="#FNanchor_55"><span class="label">[55]</span></a>
- <i>Compte Rendu</i>, 1873, p. 66.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_56" href="#FNanchor_56"><span class="label">[56]</span></a>
- <i>An Historical Account of Earthquakes</i>, p. 46.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_57" href="#FNanchor_57"><span class="label">[57]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. xlix. p. 436.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_58" href="#FNanchor_58"><span class="label">[58]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vol. xlv. p. 129.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_59" href="#FNanchor_59"><span class="label">[59]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. xlix. p. 547.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_60" href="#FNanchor_60"><span class="label">[60]</span></a>
- <i>Ibid.</i> vols. xlii. and xxxix.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_61" href="#FNanchor_61"><span class="label">[61]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. xlix, part i.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_62" href="#FNanchor_62"><span class="label">[62]</span></a>
- <i>Compte Rendu</i>, 1873, part ii. p. 66.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_63" href="#FNanchor_63"><span class="label">[63]</span></a>
- <i>Die Vulcan. Ers. d. Erde</i>, C. W. C. Fuchs.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_64" href="#FNanchor_64"><span class="label">[64]</span></a>
- <i>Comte Rendu</i>, 1875, p. 693.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_65" href="#FNanchor_65"><span class="label">[65]</span></a>
- <i>Gent. Mag.</i> vol. xix. p. 190.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_66" href="#FNanchor_66"><span class="label">[66]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. xlix. p. 115.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_67" href="#FNanchor_67"><span class="label">[67]</span></a>
- <i>Gent. Mag.</i> vol. xxi. 1751.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_68" href="#FNanchor_68"><span class="label">[68]</span></a>
- <i>Jour. Royal Geo. Soc.</i> vol. vi. p. 319.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_69" href="#FNanchor_69"><span class="label">[69]</span></a>
- Darwin, <i>Geolog. Observations</i>, p. 232.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_70" href="#FNanchor_70"><span class="label">[70]</span></a>
- <i>Ibid.</i> p. 245.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_71" href="#FNanchor_71"><span class="label">[71]</span></a>
- Lyell, <i>Principles of Geology</i>, vol. ii. pp. 107–8.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_72" href="#FNanchor_72"><span class="label">[72]</span></a>
- <i>Gent. Mag.</i> 1733, vol. iii. p. 217.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_73" href="#FNanchor_73"><span class="label">[73]</span></a>
- ‘Earthquakes of Cutch,’ <i>Jour. Royal Geo. Soc.</i> vol. xl.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_74" href="#FNanchor_74"><span class="label">[74]</span></a>
- M. Daussy, ‘Sur l’existence probable d’un volcan sousmarin situé ar environ 0° 20′ de lat. S.,
- et 22° 0′ de long, ouest,’ <i>Comptes Rendus</i>, vol. vi. p. 512.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_75" href="#FNanchor_75"><span class="label">[75]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vol. xlv. p. 133.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_76" href="#FNanchor_76"><span class="label">[76]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vol. xiv. p. 209.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_77" href="#FNanchor_77"><span class="label">[77]</span></a>
- D. C. F. Winslow, ‘Tides at Tahiti,’ <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> 1865, p. 45; also Mallet’s <i>Catalogue of Earthquakes</i>.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_78" href="#FNanchor_78"><span class="label">[78]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vol. i. p. 469.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_79" href="#FNanchor_79"><span class="label">[79]</span></a>
- Darwin, <i>Researches in Geology, &amp;c.</i>, p. 378.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_80" href="#FNanchor_80"><span class="label">[80]</span></a>
- Kluge, <i>Jahrb. f. Min.</i> 1861, p. 977.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_81" href="#FNanchor_81"><span class="label">[81]</span></a>
- Darwin, <i>Voyage of a Naturalist</i>, p. 309.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_82" href="#FNanchor_82"><span class="label">[82]</span></a>
- Prof. A. D. Bache, <i>United States Coast Survey Report</i>, 1855, p. 342.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_83" href="#FNanchor_83"><span class="label">[83]</span></a>
- <i>United States Coast Surrey Report</i>, or <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vi. p. 77.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_84" href="#FNanchor_84"><span class="label">[84]</span></a>
- <i>Petermann’s Mittheilungen</i>, 1877, Heft xii. S. 454, and <i>Nova Acta der
- Ksl. Leop. Carol. Deutschen Acad. d Naturforscher</i>, Band xl. No. 9.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_85" href="#FNanchor_85"><span class="label">[85]</span></a>
- J. Milne: ‘Peruvian Earthquake of May 9, 1877.’ See <i>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</i>, vol. ii.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_86" href="#FNanchor_86"><span class="label">[86]</span></a>
- <i>Report of British Association</i>, 1847, p. 84.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_87" href="#FNanchor_87"><span class="label">[87]</span></a>
- <i>Das Erdbeben von Herzogenrath, &amp;c.</i>, p. 134.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_88" href="#FNanchor_88"><span class="label">[88]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. li.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_89" href="#FNanchor_89"><span class="label">[89]</span></a>
- See <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> 1872.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_90" href="#FNanchor_90"><span class="label">[90]</span></a>
- David Milne says that ‘out of 110 shocks recorded in
- England, thirty-one originated in Wales, thirty-one along the south
- coast of England, fourteen on the borders of Yorkshire and Derbyshire,
- and five or six in Cumberland.’
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_91" href="#FNanchor_91"><span class="label">[91]</span></a>
- E. Suess, <i>Die Erdbeben Niederösterreiches</i>.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_92" href="#FNanchor_92"><span class="label">[92]</span></a>
- H. Hoeffer, <i>Die Erdbeben Kärntens</i>.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_93" href="#FNanchor_93"><span class="label">[93]</span></a>
- <i>Six Lectures on Physical Geography</i>, by Rev. S. Haughton, F.R.S., chap. i.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_94" href="#FNanchor_94"><span class="label">[94]</span></a>
- Ramsay, ‘Geological History of Mountain Chains,’ <i>Mining Journal</i>.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_95" href="#FNanchor_95"><span class="label">[95]</span></a>
- A notable example of a rapid diminution in the number of
- earthquakes felt at a place is that of Comrie in Scotland. In 1839–40,
- no less than sixty shocks were felt in eleven months. In 1842–43, about
- thirty shocks were felt, and in the following year thirty-seven. Since
- this time the number of shocks has decreased until they are almost of
- as rare occurrence at Comrie as in other portions of the British Isles.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_96" href="#FNanchor_96"><span class="label">[96]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. i. 1836.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_97" href="#FNanchor_97"><span class="label">[97]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. of Sci.</i> vol. xxxvii. p. 1.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_98" href="#FNanchor_98"><span class="label">[98]</span></a>
- Milne, ‘British Earthquakes,’ <i>Edin. Phil. Jour.</i> vol.
- xxxi.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_99" href="#FNanchor_99"><span class="label">[99]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. xlix. pt. i.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_100" href="#FNanchor_100"><span class="label">[100]</span></a>
- <i>Compte Rendus</i>, 1875, p. 690.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_101" href="#FNanchor_101"><span class="label">[101]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vol. xi. p. 233.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_102" href="#FNanchor_102"><span class="label">[102]</span></a>
- <i>Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan</i>, vol. vi. pt. i. p. 353.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_103" href="#FNanchor_103"><span class="label">[103]</span></a>
- Kluge, <i>Ueber die Ursachen</i>, &amp;c., p. 74.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_104" href="#FNanchor_104"><span class="label">[104]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vol. xix. p. 162.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_105" href="#FNanchor_105"><span class="label">[105]</span></a>
- <i>Mitt. d. Deutsch.</i> Ges., Aug. 1878.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_106" href="#FNanchor_106"><span class="label">[106]</span></a>
- <i>Report to British Association</i>, 1850, p. 74.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_107" href="#FNanchor_107"><span class="label">[107]</span></a>
- Fuchs, <i>Die Vulkanischen Erscheinungen der Erde</i>, p. 424.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_108" href="#FNanchor_108"><span class="label">[108]</span></a>
- <i>Bern. Naturf. Gesellschaft</i>, 1852.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_109" href="#FNanchor_109"><span class="label">[109]</span></a>
- <i>Comptes Rendus</i>, 1874, Jan. to June, p. 51.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_110" href="#FNanchor_110"><span class="label">[110]</span></a>
- Boué, <i>Parallele der Erdbeben, Nordlichter und Erdmagnetismus, in Sitz. der K. A. d. Wissensch</i>. 1856, vol. iv. p. 395.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_111" href="#FNanchor_111"><span class="label">[111]</span></a>
- <i>Meteorologia Endogena</i>, vol. i. p. 107, &amp;c.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_112" href="#FNanchor_112"><span class="label">[112]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. lxviii. p. 221.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_113" href="#FNanchor_113"><span class="label">[113]</span></a>
- <i>Gent. Mag.</i> vol. xxvii. p. 508.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_114" href="#FNanchor_114"><span class="label">[114]</span></a>
- <i>Die Vulkanischen Erscheinungen der Erde</i>, p. 419.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_115" href="#FNanchor_115"><span class="label">[115]</span></a>
- Petermann’s <i>Geogr. Mitth.</i> 1858, sec. 246.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_116" href="#FNanchor_116"><span class="label">[116]</span></a>
- <i>Notes on volcanoes of the Hawaiian Islands</i>, W. T. Brigham, Mem. Boston Soc. of Nat. Hist., 1868.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_117" href="#FNanchor_117"><span class="label">[117]</span></a>
- <i>Gent. Mag.</i> vol. xxiii., 1753.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_118" href="#FNanchor_118"><span class="label">[118]</span></a>
- <i>Jour. Royal Geog. Soc.</i> vol. vi.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_119" href="#FNanchor_119"><span class="label">[119]</span></a>
- <i>Ibid.</i> vol. vi.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_120" href="#FNanchor_120"><span class="label">[120]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. xlii.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_121" href="#FNanchor_121"><span class="label">[121]</span></a>
- <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vol. x. p. 191.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_122" href="#FNanchor_122"><span class="label">[122]</span></a>
- ‘Earthquakes of San Salvador, December 21–30, 1879.’ <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> vol. xix. p. 415.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_123" href="#FNanchor_123"><span class="label">[123]</span></a>
- <i>Gent. Mag.</i> 1757, p. 323.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_124" href="#FNanchor_124"><span class="label">[124]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. li., 1760.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_125" href="#FNanchor_125"><span class="label">[125]</span></a>
- Mallet, <i>Report to Brit. Ass.</i>, 1858, p. 67.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_126" href="#FNanchor_126"><span class="label">[126]</span></a>
- Von Lasaulx, <i>Earthquakes of Herzogenrath</i>.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_127" href="#FNanchor_127"><span class="label">[127]</span></a>
- Lyell, <i>Principles</i>, vol. ii. p. 51.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_128" href="#FNanchor_128"><span class="label">[128]</span></a>
- Lyell, <i>Principles</i>, vol. i. p. 402.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_129" href="#FNanchor_129"><span class="label">[129]</span></a>
- Fuchs, p. 464.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_130" href="#FNanchor_130"><span class="label">[130]</span></a>
- <i>Comptes Rendus</i>, August 1854.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_131" href="#FNanchor_131"><span class="label">[131]</span></a>
- <i>Nature</i>, April 26, 1883.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_132" href="#FNanchor_132"><span class="label">[132]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Soc.</i>, Wellington, New Zealand, 1875.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_133" href="#FNanchor_133"><span class="label">[133]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i>, vol. xlii.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_134" href="#FNanchor_134"><span class="label">[134]</span></a>
- M. S. di Rossi, <i>Earthquakes of Casamicciola</i>.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_135" href="#FNanchor_135"><span class="label">[135]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i>, vol. xviii. 1683–5.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_136" href="#FNanchor_136"><span class="label">[136]</span></a>
- <i>Ibid.</i> vol. xlix.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_137" href="#FNanchor_137"><span class="label">[137]</span></a>
- H. D. Warner, ‘The City of Earthquakes,’ <i>Atlantic Monthly</i>, March 1833.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_138" href="#FNanchor_138"><span class="label">[138]</span></a>
- Palmer, <i>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</i>, vol. iii. p. 148.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_139" href="#FNanchor_139"><span class="label">[139]</span></a>
- Palmer, <i>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</i>, vol. iii. p. 148.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_140" href="#FNanchor_140"><span class="label">[140]</span></a>
- Paul, <i>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</i>, vol. ii. p. 41.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_141" href="#FNanchor_141"><span class="label">[141]</span></a>
- G. H. and H. Darwin, <i>Reports of British Association</i>, 1881.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_142" href="#FNanchor_142"><span class="label">[142]</span></a>
- <i>Reports of British Association</i>, 1881.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_143" href="#FNanchor_143"><span class="label">[143]</span></a>
- <i>Comptes Rendus</i>, 1875, January to June, p. 685.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_144" href="#FNanchor_144"><span class="label">[144]</span></a>
- <i>Tel. Jour.</i>, November 15, 1881.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_145" href="#FNanchor_145"><span class="label">[145]</span></a>
- <i>Minutes and proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers</i>, vol. lx. p. 412, and vol. lxiv. p. 343.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_146" href="#FNanchor_146"><span class="label">[146]</span></a>
- <i>See</i> ‘Earth Tremors,’ p. 309, experiments of M. d’Abbadie, &amp;c.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_147" href="#FNanchor_147"><span class="label">[147]</span></a> <i>Meteorologia Endogena.</i>
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_148" href="#FNanchor_148"><span class="label">[148]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_149" href="#FNanchor_149"><span class="label">[149]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. xlix. p. 544.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_150" href="#FNanchor_150"><span class="label">[150]</span></a>
- <i>Annual Register</i>, vol. iv. 1761, p. 92.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_151" href="#FNanchor_151"><span class="label">[151]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Mag.</i>, May 1876, p. 447.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_152" href="#FNanchor_152"><span class="label">[152]</span></a>
- <i>Boston Soc. Nat. Hist.</i>, 1868.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_153" href="#FNanchor_153"><span class="label">[153]</span></a>
- ‘Notes on Tides at Tahiti,’ &amp;c., <i>Am. Jour. Sci.</i> 1866, vol. xlii. p. 45.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_154" href="#FNanchor_154"><span class="label">[154]</span></a>
- <i>Trans. Seis. Soc. of Japan</i>, vol. iv. Milne, <i>Systematic Observation of Earthquakes</i>.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_155" href="#FNanchor_155"><span class="label">[155]</span></a>
- <i>Principles of Geology</i>, vol. ii. 177.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_156" href="#FNanchor_156"><span class="label">[156]</span></a>
- <i>Gent. Mag.</i>, vol. xxvii. p. 448.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_157" href="#FNanchor_157"><span class="label">[157]</span></a>
- <i>Phil. Trans.</i>, vol. xli. p. 805.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_158" href="#FNanchor_158"><span class="label">[158]</span></a>
- <i>Meteorologia Endogena</i>, vol. i. pp. 186, 187.
- </div>
-
- <div class="footnote">
- <a id="Footnote_159" href="#FNanchor_159"><span class="label">[159]</span></a>
- Darwin, <i>Geological Observations</i>, p. 275 <i>et seq.</i>
- </div>
- </div>
-
- <hr class="page" />
-
- <div class="center mb2">THE<br /><span class="xlarge">INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SERIES.</span></div>
- <hr class="r15" />
- <p class="center"><span class="smcap">Each book complete in One Volume, 12mo, and bound in Cloth.</span></p>
- <hr class="r15" />
-
- <ol>
- <li class="biblio">FORMS OF WATER: A Familiar Exposition of the Origin and
- Phenomena of Glaciers. By <span class="smcap">J. Tyndall</span>, LL. D., F. R. S.
- With 25 Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">PHYSICS AND POLITICS; Or, Thoughts on the Application of the
- Principles of “Natural Selection” and “Inheritance” to Political
- Society. By <span class="smcap">Walter Bagehot</span>. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">FOODS. By <span class="smcap">Edward Smith</span>, M. D., LL. B., F. R. S. With
- numerous Illustrations. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">MIND AND BODY: The Theories of their Relation. By <span class="smcap">Alexander
- Bain</span>, LL. D. With 4 Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE STUDY OF SOCIOLOGY. By <span class="smcap">Herbert Spencer</span>. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE NEW CHEMISTRY. By Professor <span class="smcap">J. P. Cooke</span>, of Harvard
- University. With 31 Illustrations. $2.00.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">ON THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. By <span class="smcap">Balfour Stewart</span>, M.
- A., LL. D., F. R. S. With 14 Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">ANIMAL LOCOMOTION; or, Walking, Swimming, and Flying. By <span class="smcap">J.
- B. Pettigrew</span>, M. D., F. R. S., etc. With 130 Illustrations.
- $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">RESPONSIBILITY IN MENTAL DISEASE. By <span class="smcap">Henry Maudsley</span>, M.
- D. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE SCIENCE OF LAW. By Professor <span class="smcap">Sheldon Amos</span>. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">ANIMAL MECHANISM: A Treatise on Terrestrial and Aërial
- Locomotion. By Professor <span class="smcap">E. J. Marey</span>. With 117
- Illustrations. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE HISTORY OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN RELIGION AND SCIENCE. By
- <span class="smcap">J. W. Draper</span>, M. D., LL. D. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE DOCTRINE OF DESCENT AND DARWINISM. By Professor <span class="smcap">Oscar
- Schmidt</span> (Strasburg University). With 26 Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE CHEMICAL EFFECTS OF LIGHT AND PHOTOGRAPHY. By Dr.
- <span class="smcap">Hermann Vogel</span> (Polytechnic Academy of Berlin). Translation
- thoroughly revised. With 100 Illustrations. $2.00.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">FUNGI: Their Nature, Influences, Uses, etc. By <span class="smcap">M. C.
- Cooke</span>, M. A., LL. D. Edited by the Rev. M. J. Berkeley, M. A.,
- F. L. S. With 109 Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE LIFE AND GROWTH OF LANGUAGE. By Professor <span class="smcap">William
- Dwight Whitney</span>, of Yale College. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">MONEY AND THE MECHANISM OF EXCHANGE. By <span class="smcap">W. Stanley
- Jevons</span>, M. A., F. R. S. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE NATURE OF LIGHT, with a General Account of Physical Optics.
- By Dr. <span class="smcap">Eugene Lommel</span>. With 188 Illustrations and a Table
- of Spectra in Chromo-lithography. $2.00.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">ANIMAL PARASITES AND MESSMATES. By Monsieur <span class="smcap">Van
- Beneden</span>. With 83 Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">FERMENTATION. By Professor <span class="smcap">Schützenberger</span>. With 28
- Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE FIVE SENSES OF MAN. By Professor <span class="smcap">Bernstein</span>. With
- 91 Illustrations. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE THEORY OF SOUND IN ITS RELATION TO MUSIC. By Professor
- <span class="smcap">Pietro Blaserna</span>. With numerous Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">STUDIES IN SPECTRUM ANALYSIS. By <span class="smcap">J. Norman Lockyer</span>, F.
- R. S. With 6 Photographic Illustrations of Spectra, and numerous
- Engravings on Wood. $2.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">A HISTORY OF THE GROWTH OF THE STEAM-ENGINE. By Professor
- <span class="smcap">R. H. Thurston</span>. With 163 Illustrations. $2.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">EDUCATION AS A SCIENCE. By <span class="smcap">Alexander Bain</span>, LL. D.
- $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">STUDENTS’ TEXT-BOOK OF COLOR; Or, Modern Chromatics. With
- Applications to Art and Industry. By Professor <span class="smcap">Ogden N.
- Rood</span>, Columbia College. New edition. With 130 Illustrations.
- $2.00.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE HUMAN SPECIES. By Professor <span class="smcap">A. de Quatrefages</span>,
- Membre de l’Institut. $2.00.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE CRAYFISH: An Introduction to the Study of Zoölogy. By
- <span class="smcap">T. H. Huxley</span>, F. R. S. With 82 Illustrations. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE ATOMIC THEORY. By Professor <span class="smcap">A. Wurtz</span>. Translated
- by E. Cleminshaw, F. C. S. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">ANIMAL LIFE AS AFFECTED BY THE NATURAL CONDITIONS OF EXISTENCE.
- By <span class="smcap">Karl Semper</span>. With 2 Maps and 106 Woodcuts. $2.00.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">SIGHT: An Exposition of the Principles of Monocular and
- Binocular Vision. By <span class="smcap">Joseph Le Conte</span>, LL. D. With 132
- Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY OF MUSCLES AND NERVES. By Professor <span class="smcap">J.
- Rosenthal</span>. With 75 Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">ILLUSIONS: A Psychological Study. By <span class="smcap">James Sully</span>.
- $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE SUN. By <span class="smcap">C. A. Young</span>, Professor of Astronomy in the
- College of New Jersey. With numerous Illustrations. $2.00.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">VOLCANOES: What they Are and what they Teach. By <span class="smcap">John W.
- Judd</span>, F. R. S., Professor of Geology in the Royal School of
- Mines. With 96 Illustrations. $2.00.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">SUICIDE: An Essay in Comparative Moral Statistics. By <span class="smcap">Henry
- Morselli</span>, M. D., Professor of Psychological Medicine, Royal
- University, Turin. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE FORMATION OF VEGETABLE MOULD, THROUGH THE ACTION OF WORMS.
- With Observations on their Habits. By <span class="smcap">Charles Darwin</span>, LL.
- D., F. R. S. With Illustrations. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE CONCEPTS AND THEORIES OF MODERN PHYSICS. By <span class="smcap">J. B.
- Stallo</span>. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE BRAIN AND ITS FUNCTIONS. By <span class="smcap">J. Luys</span>. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">MYTH AND SCIENCE. By <span class="smcap">Tito Vignoli</span>. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">DISEASES OF MEMORY: An Essay in the Positive Psychology. By
- <span class="smcap">Th. Ribot</span>, author of “Heredity.” $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">ANTS, BEES, AND WASPS. A Record of Observations of the Habits
- of the Social Hymenoptera. By Sir <span class="smcap">John Lubbock</span>, Bart., F.
- R. S., D. C. L., LL. D., etc. $2.00.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">SCIENCE OF POLITICS. By <span class="smcap">Sheldon Amos</span>. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">ANIMAL INTELLIGENCE. By <span class="smcap">George J. Romanes</span>. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">MAN BEFORE METALS. By <span class="smcap">N. Joly</span>, Correspondent of the
- Institute. With 148 Illustrations. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE ORGANS OF SPEECH AND THEIR APPLICATION IN THE FORMATION
- OF ARTICULATE SOUNDS. By <span class="smcap">G. H. von Meyer</span>, Professor in
- Ordinary of Anatomy at the University of Zürich. With 47 Woodcuts.
- $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">FALLACIES: A View of Logic from the Practical Side. By
- <span class="smcap">Alfred Sidgwick</span>, B. A., Oxon. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED PLANTS. By <span class="smcap">Alphonse de Candolle</span>.
- $2.00.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">JELLY-FISH, STAR-FISH, AND SEA-URCHINS. Being a Research on
- Primitive Nervous Systems. By <span class="smcap">George J. Romanes</span>. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE COMMON SENSE OF THE EXACT SCIENCES. By the late <span class="smcap">William
- Kingdon Clifford</span>. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">PHYSICAL EXPRESSION: Its Modes and Principles. By <span class="smcap">Francis
- Warner</span>, M. D., Assistant Physician, and Lecturer on Botany to
- the London Hospital, etc. With 51 Illustrations. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">ANTHROPOID APES. By <span class="smcap">Robert Hartmann</span>, Professor in the
- University of Berlin. With 63 Illustrations. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">THE MAMMALIA IN THEIR RELATION TO PRIMEVAL TIMES. By <span class="smcap">Oscar
- Schmidt</span>. $1.50.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">COMPARATIVE LITERATURE. By <span class="smcap">Hutcheson Macaulay Posnett</span>,
- M. A., LL. D., F. L. S., Barrister-at-Law; Professor of Classics
- and English Literature, University College, Auckland, New Zealand,
- author of “The Historical Method,” etc. $1.75.</li>
-
- <li class="biblio">EARTHQUAKES AND OTHER EARTH MOVEMENTS. By <span class="smcap">John Milne</span>,
- Professor of Mining and Geology in the Imperial College of
- Engineering, Tokio, Japan. With 38 Figures.</li>
- </ol>
-
- <hr class="r15" />
-
- <p class="center">New York: D. APPLETON &amp; CO., 1, 3, &amp; 5 Bond Street.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
-
- <div class="xxlarge gespertt center">VOLCANOES:</div>
-
- <div class="center gespertt"><i>WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY TEACH</i>.</div>
-
- <p class="center"><b>By J. W. JUDD</b>,<br />
- <span class="small">Professor of Geology in the Royal School of Mines (London).</span></p>
-
- <hr class="r15" />
- <p class="center">With Ninety-six Illustrations. 12mo. Cloth, $2.00.</p>
- <hr class="r15" />
-
- <p>“The volume before us is one of the pleasantest science manuals we have
- read for some time.”—<i>Athenæum.</i></p>
-
- <p>“Mr. Judd’s summary is so full and so concise, that it is almost
- impossible to give a fair idea in a short review.”—<i>Pall Mall Gazette.</i></p>
-
- <p>“Professor Judd discusses the nature of volcanic action, the internal
- structure of volcanic mountains, the distribution of volcanoes upon
- the surface of the globe, their activity in different periods of the
- earth’s existence, the use of volcanoes in the economy of nature, the
- various theories that have been made to explain volcanic action. He has
- abbreviated in this volume a vast amount of information, which has a
- fascinating interest for many minds by reason of its relation to the
- past history and future destiny of this little bubble of earth upon
- which we sail through the infinite spaces of ether.”—<i>New York Home
- Journal.</i></p>
-
- <p>“The book gives an exhaustive statement of the phenomena of volcanoes,
- and of the facts in the formation of mountain-chains, and relates a
- mass of interesting observations and facts, the results of patient and
- extensive personal investigation and study, mostly in different places
- in Southern Europe, but not neglecting the world’s larger volcanoes in
- other regions.”—<i>Hartford Times.</i></p>
-
- <p>“A fascinating example of patient observation, sound judgment, and
- acute reasoning. Under Professor Judd’s skillful treatment the volcano
- is forced not only to tell its own history, but also to solve a number
- of earth problems seemingly disconnected with it; and the story is
- told in strong, nervous language, and with an earnestness and subdued
- enthusiasm that are delightfully stimulating.”—<i>Boston Gazette.</i></p>
-
- <p>“Professor Judd first points out the errors in the old definition of
- a volcano. The volcanic hole is very often not on the summit, but
- on the side, sometimes at the base of the mountain or hill, and it
- sends forth steam rather than smoke, and the supposed raging flames
- are nothing more than the glowing light of a mass of molten material
- reflected from those vapor-clouds. So our old ignorance vanishes, and
- in this admirable work the internal structure of volcanic mountains,
- the nature and products of volcanic action, and the distribution of the
- materials rejected from volcanic vents, the succession of operations
- taking place at volcanic centers, are all very ably and clearly
- discussed.”—<i>Philadelphia Times.</i></p>
-
- <p>“A succinct and excellent treatise on a very interesting
- subject.”—<i>Philadelphia North American.</i></p>
-
- <hr class="r15" />
-
- <p class="center"><i>For sale by all booksellers; or sent by mail, post paid, on receipt of
- price.</i></p>
-
- <hr class="r15" />
- <p class="center">New York: D. APPLETON &amp; CO., 1, 3, &amp; 5 Bond Street.</p>
-
- <hr class="page" />
- <p class="xxlarge center"><span class="smcap">The Concepts and Theories of Modern Physics.</span></p>
-
- <p class="center"><b>By J. B. STALLO.</b></p>
-
- <hr class="r15" />
- <p class="center">12mo, cloth&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; $1.75.</p>
-
- <hr class="r15" />
-
- <p>“Judge Stallo’s work is an inquiry into the validity of those
- mechanical conceptions of the universe which are now held as
- fundamental in physical science. He takes up the leading modern
- doctrines which are based upon this mechanical conception, such as
- the atomic constitution of matter, the kinetic theory of gases, the
- conservation of energy, the nebular hypothesis, and other views, to
- find how much stands upon solid empirical ground, and how much rests
- upon metaphysical speculation. Since the appearance of Dr. Draper’s
- ‘Religion and Science,’ no book has been published in the country
- calculated to make so deep an impression on thoughtful and educated
- readers as this volume.... The range and minuteness of the author’s
- learning, the acuteness of his reasoning, and the singular precision
- and clearness of his style, are qualities which very seldom have been
- jointly exhibited in a scientific treatise.”—<i>New York Sun.</i></p>
-
- <p>“Judge J. B. Stallo, of Cincinnati, is a German by birth, and came to
- this country at about the age of seventeen. He was early familiar with
- science, and he lectured for some years in an Eastern college; but
- at length he adopted the profession of law. He is also remembered by
- many as an author, having a number of years ago written a metaphysical
- treatise of marked ability for one of his youthful years. His present
- book must be read deliberately, must be studied to be appreciated; but
- the students of science, as well as those of metaphysics, are certain
- to be deeply interested in its logical developments. It is a timely and
- telling contribution to the philosophy of science, imperatively called
- for by the present exigencies in the progress of knowledge. It is to be
- commended equally for the solid value of its contents and the scholarly
- finish of its execution.”—<i>The Popular Science Monthly.</i></p>
-
- <p>“The book is of vital interest to a much larger class than
- specialists—to all, in fact, who value clear thinking or are interested
- in the accuracy more than the progress of scientific thought. It deals
- with the results and theories of physical science, and in no sense
- with the processes of the laboratory. It is written with a clearness
- that is uncommon in philosophic works and with a desire to find truth,
- conscious of the fact that a prime prerequisite of finding it is to
- clear the way of accumulated and fast-settling untruths. It is a
- scientific rebuke, as severe as it is lucid, of the scientists who
- leave their apparatus and go star-gazing: here is the pit into which
- they have fallen.”—<i>New York World.</i></p>
-
- <p>“The volume is an important contribution to scientific discussion,
- and is marked by closeness of reasoning, and clearness and cogency of
- statement.”—<i>Boston Journal.</i></p>
-
- <hr class="r15" />
- <p class="center"><i>For sale by all booksellers; or sent by mail, post paid, on receipt of
- price.</i></p>
-
- <hr class="r15" />
- <p class="center">New York: D. APPLETON &amp; CO., 1, 3, &amp; 5 Bond Street.</p>
-
- <div class="transnote mt10">
- <p class="large"><b>Transcriber’s Notes:</b></p>
- <p>Blank pages have been removed.</p>
- <p>Silently corrected typographical errors.</p>
- <p>Spelling and hyphenation variations made consistent.</p>
- <p>Front publication list moved to the back.</p>
- <p>Tables pages 77, 89: removed unneeded right braces.</p>
- <p>Tables pages 240, 257: changed to use cell borders instead of large right braces.</p>
- <p>Table page 259: Northern Hemisphere average 15·0 corrected to 150.</p>
- </div>
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-<pre>
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Earthquakes and Other Earth Movements, by
-John Milne
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK EARTHQUAKES, OTHER EARTH MOVEMENTS ***
-
-***** This file should be named 60007-h.htm or 60007-h.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/6/0/0/0/60007/
-
-Produced by deaurider, Robert Tonsing, and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
-file was produced from images generously made available
-by The Internet Archive)
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
-specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
-eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
-for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
-performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
-away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
-not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
-trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country outside the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
- are located before using this ebook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
-Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
-mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
-volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
-locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
-Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
-date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
-official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
-
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-
-
-
-</pre>
-
-</body>
-
-</html>