diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'old/55489-h/55489-h.htm')
| -rw-r--r-- | old/55489-h/55489-h.htm | 10310 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10310 deletions
diff --git a/old/55489-h/55489-h.htm b/old/55489-h/55489-h.htm deleted file mode 100644 index 7fdbbbf..0000000 --- a/old/55489-h/55489-h.htm +++ /dev/null @@ -1,10310 +0,0 @@ -<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" - "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> -<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> - <head> - <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" /> - <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> - <title> - The Project Gutenberg eBook of Representative British Orations, Volume I (of 4), by Charles Kendall Adams.. - </title> - <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" /> - <style type="text/css"> - -body { - margin-left: 2.5em; - margin-right: 2.5em; -} - -h1, h2 { - text-align: center; - clear: both; - margin-top: 2.5em; - margin-bottom: 1em; -} - -h1 {line-height: 2; margin-top: 0;} - -h2+p {margin-top: 1.5em;} -h2 .subhead {display: block; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em;} - -.transnote h2 { - margin-top: .5em; - margin-bottom: 1em; -} - -.subhead { - text-indent: 0; - text-align: center; - font-size: 75%; - max-width: 80%; margin-left: 10%; -} - -p { - text-indent: 1.75em; - margin-top: .51em; - margin-bottom: .24em; - text-align: justify; -} -.caption p {text-align: center; text-indent: 0;} -p.center {text-indent: 0;} - -.p1 {margin-top: 1em;} -.p2 {margin-top: 2em;} -.p4 {margin-top: 4em;} -.b1 {margin-bottom: 1em;} -.vspace {line-height: 1.5;} - -.in0 {text-indent: 0;} -.in1 {padding-left: 1em;} -.in6 {padding-left: 5.5em;} -.l2 {padding-right: 2em;} - -.small {font-size: 70%;} -.smaller {font-size: 85%;} -.larger {font-size: 125%;} -.large {font-size: 150%;} -.xlarge {font-size: 175%;} - -.center {text-align: center;} - -.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} -.smcap.smaller {font-size: 75%;} - -.bold {font-weight: bold;} - -hr { - width: 33%; - margin-top: 4em; - margin-bottom: 4em; - margin-left: 33%; - margin-right: auto; - clear: both; -} - -table { - margin: 1em auto 1em auto; - margin-left: auto; - margin-right: auto; - max-width: 80%; - border-collapse: collapse; -} - -.tdl { - text-align: left; - vertical-align: top; - padding-right: 1em; - padding-left: 1.5em; - text-indent: -1.5em; -} - -.tdc {text-align: center;} - -.tdr { - text-align: right; - vertical-align: bottom; - padding-left: .3em; - white-space: nowrap; -} - -#toc .tdl, #toc .tdr {padding-top: 1em;} -#toc tr.sub .tdl {padding-top: .25em;} -#toc .tdl.notpad, #toc .tdr.notpad {padding-top: 0;} -tr.sub .tdl { - font-size: 90%; - text-align: justify; - padding-left: 3em; - text-indent: -1.5em; -} - -#pop th { - font-size: 110%; - font-weight: normal; - text-align: center; - border-top: thin solid black; - border-bottom: thin solid black; - border-left: thin solid black; - padding-top: .33em; padding-bottom: .33em; -} -#pop th.nobdr {border-left: none;} -#pop td.tdc {border-left: thin solid black; padding-left: 1em; padding-right: 1em;} -#pop tr.bot td {border-bottom: thin solid black;} -.table200 {width: 25em;} -.bt {border-top: thin solid black;} - -.pagenum { - position: absolute; - right: 4px; - text-indent: 0em; - text-align: right; - font-size: 70%; - font-weight: normal; - font-variant: normal; - font-style: normal; - letter-spacing: normal; - line-height: normal; - color: #acacac; - border: 1px solid #acacac; - background: #ffffff; - padding: 1px 2px; -} - -.footnotes {font-size: 95%;} - -.footnotep { - border: thin dashed black; - margin: 1.5em 10%; - padding: .5em 1em .5em 1.5em; - font-size: 90%; -} - -.footnote {margin-top: 1em;} -.footnote p, .footnotep p {text-indent: 1em;} -.footnote p.in0 {text-indent: 0;} - -.fnanchor { - vertical-align: 60%; - line-height: .7; - font-size: smaller; - text-decoration: none; -} -.footnote .fnanchor {font-size: .8em;} -.fnanchor.smaller {font-size: .5em; vertical-align: text-top;} -.footnotes .fnanchor { - vertical-align: inherit; - line-height: inherit; - text-decoration: underline; - font-size: 110%; -} - -blockquote { - margin-left: 5%; - margin-right: 5%; - font-size: 95%; -} -blockquote.end {margin-left: 2%; margin-right: 2%; margin-top: 2em; font-size: 92.5%;} - -blockquote.inhead p, blockquote.hang p {padding-left: 1.5em; text-indent: -1.5em;} -blockquote.inhead.center p {padding-left: 0; text-indent: 0; text-align: center;} -.ad blockquote {margin-left: 0; padding-left: .5em;} - -.hang { - text-align: justify; - padding-left: 1.5em; - text-indent: -1.5em; -} - -.poem-container { - text-align: center; - font-size: 98%; -} - -.poem { - display: inline-block; - text-align: left; - margin-left: 0; -} - -.poem .stanza{padding: 0.5em 0;} -.poem .stanza-attrib {padding-bottom: 0;} - -.poem .attrib {margin-right: -2em; text-align: right;} - -.poem span.iq {display: block; margin-left: -.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} -.poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} -.poem span.i2 {display: block; margin-left: 1em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} -.poem span.i16 {display: block; margin-left: 7em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} -.poem span.i18 {display: block; margin-left: 8em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} -.poem span.i20 {display: block; margin-left: 9em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - -.transnote { - background-color: #EEE; - border: thin dotted; - font-family: sans-serif, serif; - color: #000; - margin-left: 5%; - margin-right: 5%; - margin-top: 4em; - margin-bottom: 2em; - padding: 1em; -} - -.sigright { - margin-right: 2em; - text-align: right;} - -.gesperrt { - letter-spacing: 0.2em; - margin-right: -0.2em; -} - -.ad { - margin-top: 4em; - display: inline-block; max-width: 20em; text-align: center; - border: thin solid black; padding: 1em;} -.narrow {display: inline-block; max-width: 35em; text-align: center; - padding: .2em;} -.bordout {border: .25em solid red; padding: .3em;} -.bordin {border: .1em solid black; padding: 1.5em;} -.sans {font-family: sans-serif, serif;} -p.sal {text-indent: 0; padding-top: .5em; margin-bottom: 0; font-size: 125%;} -p.sal+p {margin-top: 0;} - -@media print, handheld -{ - h1, .chapter, .newpage {page-break-before: always;} - h1.nobreak, h2.nobreak, .nobreak {page-break-before: avoid; padding-top: 0;} - - p { - margin-top: .5em; - text-align: justify; - margin-bottom: .25em; - } - - table {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: auto; width: 85%; max-width: 85%;} - table.table200 {width: 85%;} - table.table200 .tdl {min-width: 80%;} - table.table200 .tdr {min-width: 20%;} - - .tdl { - padding-left: 1em; - text-indent: -1em; - padding-right: 0; - } - .ad { - margin-top: 4em; margin-left: 10%; - display: block; max-width: 20em; text-align: left; - border: thin solid black; padding: 1em;} - .narrow {display: block; max-width: 35em; text-align: center; - padding: .2em; margin-left: 10%;} - .bordout {border: .25em solid red; padding: .3em;} - .bordin {border: .1em solid black; padding: 1.5em;} - -} - -@media handheld -{ - body {margin: 0;} - - hr { - margin-top: .1em; - margin-bottom: .1em; - visibility: hidden; - color: white; - width: .01em; - display: none; - } - - blockquote {margin: 1.5em 3% 1.5em 3%;} - - .poem-container {text-align: left; margin-left: 5%;} - .poem {display: block;} - .poem .attrib {max-width: 25em; margin-right: 0;} - .poem .stanza {page-break-inside: avoid;} - - .hang {margin: .5em 3% 2em 3%;} - - .transnote { - page-break-inside: avoid; - margin-left: 2%; - margin-right: 2%; - margin-top: 1em; - margin-bottom: 1em; - padding: .5em; - } - -} - </style> - </head> - -<body> - - -<pre> - -The Project Gutenberg EBook of Representative British Orations with -Introductions and Explanatory Notes,, by Charles Kendall Adams - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most -other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions -whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of -the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at -www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have -to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook. - -Title: Representative British Orations with Introductions and Explanatory Notes, Volume I (of 4) - -Author: Charles Kendall Adams - -Release Date: September 6, 2017 [EBook #55489] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: UTF-8 - -*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK REPRESENTATIVE BRITISH ORATIONS, VOL 1 *** - - - - -Produced by Larry B. Harrison, Charlie Howard, and the -Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net -(This file was produced from images generously made -available by The Internet Archive) - - - - - - -</pre> - - -<div class="center"><div class="ad"> -<p class="center sans">Uniform with British Orations</p> - -<blockquote class="hang"> - -<p>AMERICAN ORATIONS, to illustrate -American Political History, edited, with -introductions, by <span class="smcap">Alexander Johnston</span>, -Professor of Jurisprudence and Political -Economy in the College of New Jersey. -3 vols., 16 mo, $3.75.</p> - -<p>PROSE MASTERPIECES FROM MODERN -ESSAYISTS, comprising single specimen essays -from <span class="smcap">Irving</span>, <span class="smcap">Leigh Hunt</span>, <span class="smcap">Lamb</span>, <span class="smcap">De -Quincey</span>, <span class="smcap">Landor</span>, <span class="smcap">Sydney Smith</span>, <span class="smcap">Thackeray</span>, -<span class="smcap">Emerson</span>, <span class="smcap">Arnold</span>, <span class="smcap">Morley</span>, <span class="smcap">Helps</span>, -<span class="smcap">Kingsley</span>, <span class="smcap">Ruskin</span>, <span class="smcap">Lowell</span>, <span class="smcap">Carlyle</span>, <span class="smcap">Macaulay</span>, -<span class="smcap">Froude</span>, <span class="smcap">Freeman</span>, <span class="smcap">Gladstone</span>, <span class="smcap">Newman</span>, -<span class="smcap">Leslie Stephen</span>. 3 vols., 16 mo, bevelled -boards, $3.75 and $4.50.</p></blockquote> - -<p class="p2 center"><span class="smcap">G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York and London</span></p> -</div></div> - -<div class="newpage p4 center"><div class="narrow bordout"> -<div class="bordin"> -<h1><span class="small">REPRESENTATIVE</span><br /> -BRITISH ORATIONS</h1> - -<p class="p2 center vspace">WITH<br /> -INTRODUCTIONS AND EXPLANATORY NOTES</p> - -<p class="p2 center vspace">BY<br /> -<span class="large">CHARLES KENDALL ADAMS.</span></p> - -<div class="p2 poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza-attrib"> -<span class="i0"><i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Videtisne quantum munus sit oratoris historia?</i></span></div> -<div class="attrib"> -—<span class="smcap">Cicero</span>, <cite>DeOratore</cite>, ii, 15</div> -</div></div> - -<p class="p1 center xlarge">✩</p> - -<p class="p1 center vspace">NEW YORK & LONDON<br /> -<span class="larger gesperrt">G. P. PUTNAM’S SONS</span><br /> -<span class="bold">The Knickerbocker Press</span><br /> -1884 -</p> -</div></div></div> - -<p class="newpage p4 center vspace smaller"> -COPYRIGHT<br /> -G. P. PUTNAM’S SONS<br /> -1884.</p> - -<p class="p2 center vspace smaller">Press of<br /> -<span class="smcap">G. P. Putnam’s Sons</span><br /> -New York -</p> - -<hr /> - -<p class="newpage p4 center vspace">TO<br /> -<span class="large">A. D. A.</span></p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_iii">iii</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="CONTENTS">CONTENTS.</h2> -</div> - -<table id="toc" summary="Contents"> - <tr class="small"> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdr">PAGE</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl notpad"><span class="smcap">Sir John Eliot</span></td> - <td class="tdr notpad"><a href="#SIR_JOHN_ELIOT">1</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Sir John Eliot</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#SIR_JOHN_ELIOT2">13</a></td></tr> - <tr class="sub"> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">On the Condition of England under the Duke of Buckingham. Delivered in House of Commons, June 3, 1628.</span></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">John Pym</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#JOHN_PYM">27</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">John Pym</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#JOHN_PYM2">37</a></td></tr> - <tr class="sub"> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">On the Subject of Grievances in the Reign of Charles I. House of Commons, April 5, 1640.</span></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Lord Chatham</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#LORD_CHATHAM">85</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Lord Chatham</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#LORD_CHATHAM2">98</a></td></tr> - <tr class="sub"> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">On the Right of Taxing America. House of Commons, January 14, 1766.</span></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Lord Chatham</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#LORD_CHATHAM3">120</a></td></tr> - <tr class="sub"> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">On an Address to the Throne concerning Affairs in America. House of Lords, November 18, 1777.</span></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Lord Mansfield</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#LORD_MANSFIELD">143</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Lord Mansfield</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#LORD_MANSFIELD2">150</a></td></tr> - <tr class="sub"> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">On the Right of England to Tax America. House of Lords, February 3, 1766.</span></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Edmund Burke</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#EDMUND_BURKE">172</a></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Mr. Burke</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#MR_BURKE">182</a></td></tr> - <tr class="sub"> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">On Moving Resolutions for Conciliation with America. House of Commons, March 22, 1775.</span></td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Illustrative Notes</span></td> - <td class="tdr"><a href="#ILLUSTRATIVE_NOTES">299</a></td></tr> -</table> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_v">v</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="PREFACE">PREFACE.</h2> -</div> - -<p>The three small volumes here offered to the -public have been prepared in the hope that -they would be of some service in showing the -great currents of political thought that have -shaped the history of Great Britain during the -past two hundred and fifty years. The effort -has been not so much to make a collection of -the most remarkable specimens of English eloquence, -as to bring together the most famous -of those oratorical utterances that have changed, -or here tended to change, the course of English -history.</p> - -<p>Eliot and Pym formulated the grievances -against absolutism, a contemplation of which -led to the revolution that established Anglican -liberty on its present basis. Chatham, Mansfield, -and Burke elaborated the principles which,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_vi">vi</span> -on the one hand, drove the American colonies -into independence, and, on the other, enabled -their independence to be won and secured. -Mackintosh and Erskine enunciated in classical -form the fundamental rights which permanently -secured the freedom of juries and the freedom -of the press. Pitt, in the most elaborate as well -as the most important of all his remarkable -speeches, expounded the English policy of continuous -opposition to Napoleon; and Fox, in -one of the most masterly of his unrivalled replies, -gave voice to that sentiment which was in -favor of negotiations for peace. Canning not -only shaped the foreign policy of the nation -during the important years immediately succeeding -the Napoleonic wars, but put that -policy into something like permanent form in -what has generally been considered the masterpiece -of his eloquence. Macaulay’s first speech -on the Reform Bill of 1832 was the most cogent -advocacy of what proved to be nothing less -than a political revolution; and Cobden, the -inspirer and apostle of Free Trade, enjoys the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_vii">vii</span> -unique distinction of having reversed the opinions -of a prime-minister by means of his persuasive -reasonings. Bright embodied in a single -eloquent address the reasons why so many have -thought the foreign policy of England to be -only worthy of condemnation. Beaconsfield -concentrated into one public utterance an -expression of the principles which it has long -been the object of the Conservative party -to promulgate and defend; and Gladstone, in -one of his Mid-Lothian speeches, put into -convenient form the political doctrines of the -Liberals in regard to affairs both at home -and abroad. It is these speeches, which at -one time or another have seemed to go forth -as in some sense the authoritative messages of -English history to mankind, that are here -brought together.</p> - -<p>The speeches are in almost all cases given -entire. A really great oration is a worthy -presentation of a great subject, and such an -utterance does not lend itself readily to abridgment, -for the reason that its very excellence<span class="pagenum" id="Page_viii">viii</span> -consists of a presentation in just proportion of -all its parts. An orator who has a great message -to deliver, and who fulfils his task in a -manner worthy of his subject, excludes every -thing that does not form an essential part of -his argument; and therefore in editing these -orations it has seldom been thought wise to -make either reductions or omissions. In a few -instances, notably in the speeches of Fox and -Cobden, a few elaborations of purely local and -temporary significance have been excluded; -but the omissions in all cases are indicated by -asterisks.</p> - -<p>In the introductions to the several speeches -an effort has been made to show not only the -political situation involved in the discussion, -but also the right of the orator to be heard. -These two objects have made it necessary to -place before the reader with some fulness the -political careers of the speakers and the political -questions at issue when the speeches were -made. The illustrative notes at the end of the -volumes are designed simply to assist the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_ix">ix</span> -reader in understanding such statements and -allusions as might otherwise be obscure.</p> - -<p>I cannot submit these volumes to the public -without expressing the hope that they will in -some small measure at least contribute to a -juster appreciation of that liberty which we -enjoy, and to a better understanding of the -arduous means by which free political institutions -have been acquired.</p> - -<p class="sigright larger">C. K. A.</p> - -<p class="smaller"> -<span class="smcap">University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</span>,<br /> -<span class="in6"><i>November 22, 1884</i>.</span> -</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_1">1</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="SIR_JOHN_ELIOT">SIR JOHN ELIOT.</h2> -</div> - -<p>During the second half of the sixteenth century -and the first half of the seventeenth, the -political and religious energies of Europe were -very largely devoted to the settlement of questions -that had been raised by that great upheaval -known as the Protestant Reformation. On the -Continent a reaction had almost everywhere set -in. Not only were the new religious doctrines -very generally stifled, but even those political -discontents which seemed to follow as an inseparable -consequence of the religious movement, -were put down with a rigorous hand. -The general tendency was toward the establishment -of a firmer absolution both in Church and -in State.</p> - -<p>But in England this tendency was arrested. -It was the good fortune of the nation to have a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_2">2</span> -monarch upon the throne who vigorously resisted -every foreign attempt to interfere with -English affairs. It was doubtless the political -situation rather than earnestness of religious -conviction that led Elizabeth to make the -Church of England independent of the Church -of Rome. But in securing political independence -she also secured the success of the Reformation. -Doubtless she was neither able nor -inclined to resist the prevailing tendency toward -political absolutism; but it had been indispensable -to her success that she should enlist in -the cause of religious and political independence -all the powers of the nation. However, -as soon as independence was established by the -destruction of the Spanish Armada, it became -evident that there was another question to be -settled of not less significance. That question -was whether the English Constitution was to be -developed in the direction of its traditional -methods, or whether the government and people -should adopt the reactionary methods that -were coming to be so generally accepted on the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">3</span> -Continent. It took a century of strife to answer -the question. The struggle did not become -earnest during the reign of Elizabeth, -but it cost Charles I. his head, and the Stuart -dynasty its right to the throne. For three -generations the kings were willing to stake -every thing in favor of the Continental policy, -while Parliament was equally anxious to maintain -the traditional methods. It was unavoidable -that a conflict should ensue; and the -Great Revolution of the seventeenth century -was the result.</p> - -<p>James I., during the whole of his reign, -showed a disposition to override whatever -principles of the Constitution stood in the way -of his personal power. Charles I. was a man -of stronger character than his father, and he -brought to the service of the same purpose a -greater energy and a more determined will. -As soon as he ascended the throne in 1625, it -began to look as though a contest would be -inevitable between royal will on the one hand -and popular freedom on the other. The King,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">4</span> -determined to rule in his own way, not only -questioned the right of Parliament to inquire -into grievances, but even insisted upon what he -regarded as his own right to levy money for the -support of the Government without the consent -of Parliament. This determination Parliament -was disposed to question, and in the end to -resist.</p> - -<p>Under the maxim of the English Government, -that “the King can do no wrong,” there -is but one way of securing redress, in case of an -undue exercise of royal power. As the Constitution -presumes that the King never acts -except under advice, his ministers, as his constitutional -advisers, may be held responsible for -all his acts. The impeachment of ministers, -therefore, is the constitutional method of redress. -It was the method resorted to in 1626. -Articles of Impeachment were brought by the -House of Commons against the King’s Prime -Minister and favorite, the Duke of Buckingham.</p> - -<p>One of the most prominent members of Parliament, -and the foremost orator of the day<span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">5</span> -was Sir John Eliot. This patriot, born in 1590, -and consequently now thirty-six years of age, -was appointed by the Commons one of the -managers of the impeachment. With such -skill and vigor did he conduct the prosecution -against Buckingham, that the king determined -to put a stop to the impeachment by ordering -Eliot’s arrest and imprisonment. Eliot was -thrown into the Tower; but the Commons regarded -the arrest as so flagrant a violation of -the rights of members that they immediately -resolved “not to do any more business till they -were righted in their privileges.” The King, in -view of this unexpected evidence of spirit on -the part of the Commons, deemed it prudent -to relent. Eliot was discharged; and the Commons, -on his triumphal reappearance in the -House, declared by vote “that their managers -had not exceeded the commission entrusted to -them.”</p> - -<p>Thus the first triumph in the contest was -gained by the Commons. But the King was -not unwilling to resort to even more desperate<span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">6</span> -measures. He determined to raise money independently -of Parliament, and, if Parliament -should continue to pry into the affairs of his -minister, to dispense with Parliament almost or -quite altogether. This desperate determination -he undertook to carry out chiefly by the raising -of forced loans and the issuing of monopolies. -But here again the King met with a more strenuous -opposition than he had anticipated. Eliot -and Hampden, with some seventy-six other -members of the English gentry refused to -make the contribution demanded. As such -defiance threatened to break down the whole -system, the King was forced either to resort to -extreme measures or to abandon his method. -He resolved upon the former course, but he -was forced to the latter. He threw Eliot and -Hampden into prison; but the outcry of the -people was so great and so general that the -necessary money could not be raised, and so he -was obliged to call his third Parliament. Eliot -and Hampden, though in prison, were elected -members; and the King, not deeming it prudent<span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">7</span> -to retain them, ordered their release a few -days before the opening of the session.</p> - -<p>The special object for which Parliament had -been called by the King was the granting of -money; but the members were in no mood to -let the opportunity pass without securing from -the monarch an acknowledgment of their rights -in definite form. Accordingly, they appointed -Sir Edward Coke, the most distinguished lawyer -of the time, to draw up a petition to the -King that should embody a declaration of the -constitutional privileges on which they reposed -their rights. The result was the famous “Petition -of Right,” an instrument which, in the -history of English liberty, has been only second -in importance to the Great Charter itself. The -petition asked the King’s assent to a number -of propositions, the most important of which -were that no loan or tax should be levied without -the consent of Parliament; that no man -should be imprisoned except by legal process; -and that soldiers should not be quartered upon -the people without the people’s consent. These<span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">8</span> -propositions introduced nothing new into the -Constitution. They professed simply to ask -the King’s approval of principles and methods -that had been acknowledged and acted upon -for hundreds of years. The great significance -of the Petition of Right was that it designed to -secure the assent of the monarch to a reign -of law instead of a reign of arbitrary will. The -object of Parliament was to put into definite -form a clear expression of the King’s purpose. -They desired to know whether his intention -was to rule according to the precedents of the -English Constitution that had been taking definite -form for centuries, or whether, on the contrary, -he was determined to build up a system -of absolutism similar to that which was very -generally coming to prevail on the Continent. -The petition passed the two Houses and went -to the King for his approval. He gave an -evasive answer.<a id="FNanchor_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">1</a><a id="FNanchor_A" href="#Footnote_A" class="fnanchor">; A</a> Parliament was taken by -surprise and seemed likely to be baffled. It was -<span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">9</span>a crisis of supreme danger. Sir John Eliot was -the first to see that if they were now to thwart -the King’s purpose it must be done by availing -themselves immediately of the responsibility of -Buckingham. He determined that the proper -course was a remonstrance to the King; and -it was in moving this remonstrance that his -great speech was made.</p> - -<div class="footnotep"> -<p><a id="Footnote_A" href="#FNanchor_A" class="fnanchor">A</a> Numerals -inserted in the course of the work refer the -reader to corresponding Illustrative Notes at the end of each -volume.</p> -</div> - -<p>On hearing the King’s answer, Parliament, in -great perplexity and despondency, immediately -adjourned till the next day. When, on the -morning of June 3, 1628, the Commons came -together, “the King’s answer,” says Rushworth, -“was read, and seemed too scant, in regard to -so much expense, time, and labor as had been expended -in contriving the petition. Whereupon -Sir John Eliot stood up and made a long speech, -and a lively representation of all grievances, -both general and particular, as if they had -never before been mentioned.”<a id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">2</a></p> - -<p>Throughout the speech there is a compactness -and an impetuosity truly remarkable. No -one at all familiar with the history and condition<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">10</span> -of the time, will fail to see that it was a -masterly presentation of the issues at stake. It -is pervaded with a tone of loyalty—even of affection—toward -the King. The argument was -founded on the theory that even under the best -of kings, with an irresponsible form of administration, -there can be no security against selfish -and ambitious ministers, and that under any -government whatever there can be no adequate -guarantees against such abuses except in the -provisions of law. The orator introduces no -grievance personal to himself, though he had -already twice suffered imprisonment for words -spoken in debate. His entire object seems to -have been to expose abuses that had oppressed -the people during the ten years under Buckingham’s -rule, and to show how, by means of his -duplicity and incompetency, the honor of the -country had been sacrificed, its allies betrayed, -and those necessities of the King created which -gave rise to the abuses complained of in the -Petition of Right.</p> - -<p>Aside from the striking oratorical merits of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">11</span> -speech and the light it throws on the all-important -struggles of the time, there are two circumstances -that tend to give it peculiar interest. -It is the earliest parliamentary speech of -real importance that has been preserved to us. -The age in which it was delivered is enough to -account for the antique air of the orator’s style—a -style, however, which will be especially -relished by all those who have learned to enjoy -the quaint literary flavor of our early masters -of English prose. The other circumstance of -especial interest is the fact that soon after the -delivery of the speech, and in consequent of it, -Eliot was thrown into prison, where, after an -ignominious confinement and a brutal treatment -of two and a half years, he died a martyr’s -death. His earnest plea not only cost him his -life, but it cost him a long period of ignominy -that was far worse than death. But he kept -the faith, and calmly underwent his slow martyrdom. -The last word that he sent out from -his prison was an expression of belief that upon -the maintenance or the abandonment of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">12</span> -privileges of Parliament would depend the future -glory or misery of England. By the -ability of his advocacy, by the constancy of his -purpose, and by the manner of his death, he -fully deserved that the author of the “Constitutional -History of England” should call him, as -he does, “the most illustrious confessor in the -cause of liberty whom that time produced.”</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">13</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="SIR_JOHN_ELIOT2">SIR JOHN ELIOT.<br /> - -<span class="subhead">ON THE CONDITION OF ENGLAND UNDER THE DUKE -OF BUCKINGHAM, DELIVERED IN THE HOUSE -OF COMMONS, JUNE 3, 1628.</span></h2> -</div> - -<p class="sal"><span class="smcap">Mr. Speaker</span>:</p> - -<p>We sit here as the great council of the King, -and, in that capacity it is our duty to take into -consideration the state and affairs of the kingdom; -and, where there is occasion, to give -them in a true representation by way of council -and advice, what we conceive necessary -or expedient for them.</p> - -<p>In this consideration, I confess, many a sad -thought has frighted me: and that not only in -respect of our dangers from abroad, which yet -I know are great, as they have been often -in this place prest and dilated to us; but in -respect of our disorders here at home, which -do inforce those dangers, as by them they were -occasioned.</p> - -<p>For I believe I shall make it clear unto you,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">14</span> -that as at first the causes of those dangers -were our disorders, our disorders still remain -our greatest dangers. It is not now so much -the potency of our enemies, as the weakness of -ourselves, that threatens us; and that saying of -the Father may be assumed by us, <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Non tam -potentia sua quam negligentia nostra</i>. Our -want of true devotion to Heaven, our insincerity -and doubling in religion, our want of -councils, our precipitate actions, the insufficiency -or unfaithfulness of our generals -abroad, the ignorance or corruption of our -ministers at home, the impoverishing of the -sovereign, the oppression and depression of the -subject, the exhausting of our treasures, the -waste of our provisions, consumption of our -ships, destruction of our men!—These make the -advantage to our enemies, not the reputation -of their arms. And if in these there be not -reformation, we need no foes abroad! Time -itself will ruin us.</p> - -<p>You will all hold it necessary that what I -am about to urge seem not an aspersion on the -state or imputation on the government, as I -have known such mentions misinterpreted. Far -is it from me to purpose this, that have none -but clear thoughts of the excellency of his<span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">15</span> -Majesty, nor can have other ends but the -advancement of his glory.</p> - -<p>To shew what I have said more fully, therefore, -I shall desire a little of your patience -extraordinary to open the particulars: which I -shall do with what brevity I may, answerable -to the importance of the cause and the necessities -now upon us; yet with such respect and -observation to the time as I hope it shall not -be thought too troublesome.</p> - -<p>For the first, then, our insincerity and doubling -in religion, the greatest and most dangerous -disorder of all others, which has never been unpunished, -and for which we have so many -strange examples of all states and in all times -to awe us,—what testimony does it want? -Will you have authority of books? look on the -collections of the committee for religion, there -is too clear an evidence. Will you have -records? see then the commission procured -for composition with the papists in the North? -Note the proceedings thereupon. You will -find them to little less amounting than a toleration -in effect, though upon some slight payments; -and the easiness in <em>them</em> will likewise -shew the favor that’s intended. Will you have -proofs of men? witness the hopes, witness the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">16</span> -presumptions, witness the reports of all the -papists generally. Observe the dispositions of -commands, the trust of officers, the confidence -of secrecies of employments, in this kingdom, -in Ireland, and elsewhere. They all will shew -it has too great a certainty. And, to these, add -but the incontrovertible evidence of that all-powerful -hand which we have felt so sorely, -to give it full assurance! For as the Heavens -oppose themselves to us, it was our impieties -that first opposed the Heavens.</p> - -<p>For the second, our want of councils, that -great disorder in a State with which there cannot -be stability,<a id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">3</a> if effects may shew their causes, as -they are often a perfect demonstration of them, -our misfortunes, our disasters, serve to prove -it! And (if reason be allowed in this dark age, -by the judgment of dependencies, the foresight -of contingencies, in affairs) the consequences -they draw with them confirm it. For, if we -view ourselves at home, are we in strength, are -we in reputation, equal to our ancestors? If -we view ourselves abroad, are our friends as -many, are our enemies no more? Do our -friends retain their safety and possessions? Do -our enemies enlarge themselves, and gain from -them and us? What council, to the loss of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">17</span> -Palatinate,<a id="FNanchor_4" href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">4</a> sacrificed both our honor and our -men sent thither; stopping those greater powers -appointed for that service, by which it -might have been defensible? What council -gave directions to that late action whose -wounds lie yet a bleeding? I mean the expedition -unto Rhée,<a id="FNanchor_5" href="#Footnote_5" class="fnanchor">5</a> of which there is yet so sad -a memory in all men! What design for us, or -advantage to our State, could that work import? -You know the wisdom of our ancestors, -the practice of their times; and how they preserved -their safeties! We all know, and have -as much cause to doubt as they had, the greatness -and ambition of that kingdom, which the -old world could not satisfy! Against this -greatness and ambition we likewise know the -proceedings of that princess, that never to be -forgotten excellence, Queen Elizabeth; whose -name, without admiration, falls not into mention -with her enemies. You know how she advanced -herself, how she advanced this kingdom, -how she advanced this nation, in glory and in -State; how she depressed her enemies, how she -upheld her friends; how she enjoyed a full -security, and made them then our scorn, who -now are made our terror!<a id="FNanchor_6" href="#Footnote_6" class="fnanchor">6</a></p> - -<p>Some of the principles she built on, were<span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">18</span> -these; and if I be mistaken, let reason and our -statesmen contradict me.</p> - -<p>First, to maintain, in what she might, a unity -in France, that that kingdom, being at peace -within itself, might be a bulwark to keep back -the power of Spain by land. Next, to preserve -an amity and league between that State and us; -that so we might join in aid of the Low Countries, -and by that means receive their help and -ships by sea.</p> - -<p>Then, that this treble cord, so wrought between -France, the States, and us, might enable -us, as occasion should require, to give assistance -unto others; by which means, the experience -of that time doth tell us, we were not only free -from those fears that now possess and trouble -us, but then our names were fearful to our -enemies. See now what correspondence our -action hath had with this.</p> - -<p>Square it by these rules. It did induce as a -necessary consequence the division in France between -the Protestants and their king, of which -there is too woeful, too lamentable an experience. -It has made an absolute breach between -that State and us; and so entertains us against -France, France in preparation against us, that -we have nothing to promise to our neighbors,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">19</span> -hardly for ourselves. Nay, but observe the -time in which it was attempted, and you shall -find it not only varying from those principles, -but directly contrary and opposite <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">ex diametro</i> -to those ends; and such as from the issue and -success rather might be thought <em>a conception of -Spain than begotten here with us</em>.<a id="FNanchor_B" href="#Footnote_B" class="fnanchor">B</a></p> - -<div class="footnotep"> -<p><a id="Footnote_B" href="#FNanchor_A" class="fnanchor">B</a> This -allusion or insinuation of Eliot’s provoked an instantaneous -uproar. Buckingham had visited the Courts of Spain -and France, and his name had been associated with discreditable -intrigues. In the streets of London there had been talk -of “treasonable correspondence,” and of “a sacrifice to vanity -or passion of the most sacred duties of patriotism.” When -Eliot, therefore, alluded to the act of England as springing -from the “conception of Spain,” he struck a sensitive spot. -The Chancellor, Sir Humphrey May, sprang to his feet, and -exclaimed: “Sir, this is strange language. It is arraigning -the Council.” But a general shout arose demanding that Eliot -should go on. Then the Chancellor said: “If Sir John Eliot is -to go on, I claim permission to go out.” In an instant, the Sergeant, -by order of the House, opened the door, and, according -to testimony of Alured, who was present, “they all bade him -begone! Yet he stayed, and heard Sir John out.” It is evident -from this incident that Eliot had the sympathies of the -House in his firm grasp. When quiet was restored, Sir John -resumed his argument.</p> -</div> - -<p>Mr. Speaker, I am sorry for this interruption, -but much more sorry if there have been occasion; -wherein, as I shall submit myself wholly -to your judgment to receive what censure you -<span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">20</span>shall give me if I have offended, so in the -integrity of my intentions, and clearness of -my thoughts, I must still retain this confidence, -that no greatness may deter me from the duties -which I owe to the service of the country, the -service of the King. With a true English heart, -I shall discharge myself as faithfully and as really, -to the extent of my poor powers, as any man -whose honors or whose offices most strictly -have obliged him.</p> - -<p>You know the dangers Denmark was then in, -and how much they concerned us; what in -respect of our alliance with that country, what -in the importance of the Sound; what an acquisition -to our enemies the gain thereof would be, -what loss, what prejudice to us! By this division, -we, breaking upon France, France being -engaged by us, and the Netherlands at amazement -between both, neither could intend to aid -that luckless King whose loss is our disaster.</p> - -<p>Can those now, that express their troubles at -the hearing of these things, and have so often -told us in this place of their knowledge in the -conjunctures and disjunctures of affairs, say -they advised in this? Was <em>this</em> an act of council, -Mr. Speaker? I have more charity than to -think it; and unless they make a confession -of themselves, I cannot believe it.<a id="FNanchor_7" href="#Footnote_7" class="fnanchor">7</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">21</span> -What shall I say? I wish there were not -cause to mention it; and, but out of apprehension -of the danger that is to come if the like -choice hereafter be not now prevented, I could -willingly be silent. But my duty to my Sovereign -and to the service of this House, the safety -and the honor of my country, are above all -respects; and what so nearly trenches to the -prejudice of these, may not, shall not, be forborne.</p> - -<p>At Cadiz,<a id="FNanchor_8" href="#Footnote_8" class="fnanchor">8</a> then, in that first expedition we -made, when they arrived and found a conquest -ready (the Spanish ships, I mean), fit for the satisfaction -of a voyage, and of which some of the -chiefs then there have since themselves assured -me the satisfaction would have been sufficient, -either in point of honor, or in point of profit. -Why was it neglected? Why was it not -achieved? it being of all hands granted how -feasible it was.</p> - -<p>Afterward, when, with the destruction of -some men, and the exposure of some others -(who, though their fortunes have not since -been such, then by chance came off), when, I -say, with the losses of our serviceable men, that -unserviceable fort was gained, and the whole -army landed, why was there nothing done,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">22</span> -nothing once attempted? If nothing were intended, -wherefore did they land? If there were -a service, why were they shipped again?</p> - -<p>Mr. Speaker, it satisfies me too much in this, -when I think of their dry and hungry march -unto that drunken quarter (for so the soldiers -termed it) where was the period of their journey, -that divers of our men being left as a -sacrifice to the enemy, that labor was at an end.</p> - -<p>For the next undertaking, at Rhée, I will -not trouble you much; only this in short: -Was not that whole action carried against the -judgment and opinion of the officers? those -that were of council? Was not the first, was -not the last, was not all, in the landing, in the -intrenching, in the continuance there, in the -assault, in the retreat? Did any advice take -place of such as were of the council? If there -should be a particular disquisition thereof, these -things would be manifest, and more. I will -not instance now the manifestation that was -made for the reason of these arms; nor by -whom, nor in what manner, nor on what -grounds it was published; nor what effects it -has wrought, drawing, as you know, almost -all the whole world into league against us! -Nor will I mention the leaving of the mines,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">23</span> -the leaving of the salt, which were in our possession; -and of a value as it is said, to have answered -much of our expense. Nor that great -wonder, which nor Alexander nor Cæsar ever -did, the enriching of the enemy by courtesies -when the soldiers wanted help! nor the private -intercourses and parlies with the fort, -which continually were held. What they intended -may be read in the success, and upon -due examination thereof they would not -want the proofs. For the last voyage to -Rochelle, there needs no observation; it is so -fresh in memory. Nor will I make an inference -or corollary on all. Your own knowledge shall -judge what truth, or what sufficiency they express.</p> - -<p>For the next, the ignorance or corruption of -our ministers, where can you miss of instances? -If you survey the court, if you survey -the country, if the church, if the city be examined; -if you observe the bar, if the bench; -if the courts, if the shipping; if the land, if the -seas; all these will render you variety of proofs. -And in such measure and proportion as shows -the greatness of our sickness, that if it have not -some speedy application for remedy, our case -is most desperate.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">24</span> -Mr. Speaker, I fear I have been too long in -these particulars that are past, and am unwilling -to offend you; therefore in the rest I -shall be shorter. And in that which concerns -the impoverishing of the King, no other arguments -will I use than such as all men grant.</p> - -<p>The exchequer you know is empty, the reputation -thereof gone! The ancient lands are -sold, the jewels pawned, the plate engaged, the -debt still great, and almost all charges, both ordinary -and extraordinary, borne by projects! -What poverty can be greater? What necessity -so great? What perfect English heart is not -almost dissolved into sorrow for the truth?</p> - -<p>For the oppression of the subject, which, as -I remember, is the next particular I proposed, -it needs no demonstration. The whole kingdom -is a proof. And for the exhausting of our -treasures, that oppression speaks it. What -waste of our provisions, what consumption of -our ships, what destruction of our men, have -been,—witness the journey to Algiers!<a id="FNanchor_9" href="#Footnote_9" class="fnanchor">9</a> Witness -that with Mansfield! Witness that to -Cadiz! Witness the next! Witness that to -Rhée! Witness the last! (And I pray God -we may never have more such witnesses.) -Witness likewise the Palatinate! Witness<span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">25</span> -Denmark! Witness the Turks! Witness the -Dunkirkers! <em>Witness all!</em> What losses we -have sustained! How we are impaired in munition, -in ships, in men! It has no contradiction! -We were never so much weakened, nor -had less hope how to be restored!</p> - -<p>These, Mr. Speaker, are our dangers; these -are they do threaten us, and are like that -Trojan horse brought in cunningly to surprise -us! For in these do lurk the strongest of our -enemies ready to issue on us; and if we do not -now the more speedily expel them, these will -be the sign and invitation to the others. They -will prepare such entrance that we shall have -no means left of refuge or defence; for if we -have these enemies at home, how can we strive -with those that are abroad? But if we be free -from these, no others can impeach us! Our -ancient English virtue, that old Spartan valor, -cleared from these disorders; being in sincerity -of religion once made friends with Heaven; -having maturity of councils, sufficiency of generals, -incorruption of officers, opulency in the -king, liberty in the people, repletion in treasures, -restitution of provisions, reparation of -ships, preservation of men—our ancient English -virtue, I say thus rectified, will secure us.</p> - -<p>But unless there be a speedy reformation in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">26</span> -these, I know not what hope or expectation we -may have.</p> - -<p>These things, sir, I shall desire to have taken -into consideration. That as we are the great -council of the kingdom, and have the apprehension -of these dangers, we may truly represent -them to the King; wherein I conceive we -are bound by a treble obligation of duty unto -God, of duty to his Majesty, and of duty to our -country.</p> - -<p>And therefore I wish it may so stand with the -wisdom and judgment of the house, that they -may be drawn into the body of a <em>Remonstrance</em>, -and there with all humility expressed; with a -prayer unto his Majesty, that for the safety of -himself, for the safety of the kingdom, for the -safety of religion, he will be pleased to give us -time to make perfect inquisition thereof; or to -take them into his own wisdom and there give -them such timely reformation as the necessity of -the cause, and his justice do import. And thus, -sir, with a large affection and loyalty to his -Majesty, and with a firm duty and service to my -country, I have suddenly, and it may be with -some disorder, expressed the weak apprehensions -I have, wherein if I have erred, I humbly -crave your pardon, and so submit it to the -censure of the House.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">27</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="JOHN_PYM">JOHN PYM.</h2> -</div> - -<p>When the English Parliament of 1628 came -together, the King told them: “If you do not -your duty, mine would then order me to use -those other means which God has put into my -hand.” Charles’s notion of Parliamentary duty -was simply that the members should vote necessary -supplies, and then leave the expenditures to -the royal will. Parliament, however, insisted -upon some assurances that abuses would not be -repeated. The Petition of Right, as we saw in -our account of Eliot, was the result. Though -the King was obliged to give his assent to the -petition, it soon became evident that he had no -intention to carry out its provisions either in -the letter or in the spirit. The liberal supplies -granted by Parliament after the signing of the -petition were soon exhausted. Every expedient<span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">28</span> -of economy was resorted to in order to -avoid the necessity of calling another Parliament.</p> - -<p>At first there was perhaps no clearly defined -purpose to cause any positive breach of -constitutional obligation, but gradually the -government drifted into a policy of the most -flagrant oppression. No Parliament was called -for eleven years. The powers of the prerogative -were strained at every point. Knighthood was -forced on the gentry in order that large -sums might be extorted as the price of composition. -Enormous fines were levied for removing -defects in title deeds. Large sums -were exacted of landowners for encroachments -on the crown lands. London, in consequence -of its open sympathy with the Parliamentary -cause, became a special object of royal dislike. -An edict was issued prohibiting the enlargement -of the metropolis; and large districts in the -suburbs were saved from demolition only by the -payment of three years’ rental to the royal -treasury. The powers of the Court of Star<span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">29</span> -Chamber were applied to the trying of causes -on the simple information of the King’s attorney, -and the court was authorized to adjudge any -punishment short of death. Under its jurisdiction -enormous fines were levied for the most -trifling offences. A simple brawl between two -wealthy lords had to be atoned for by the payment -of £5,000, and more than twice that sum -was exacted of a gentleman as a fine for contracting -marriage with his niece. Monopolies, -which had been formally abandoned both by -Elizabeth and by James, were now revived in -direct and open violation of the Petition of -Right, in order that large sums might be realized -from the persons receiving the privileges -bestowed by the concession. Nearly every -article of domestic necessity had to be procured -directly or indirectly from some monopolist; -and, consequently, the expense of living was -very greatly increased. Customs duties were -levied just as if they had been voted by -Parliament, and after a time writs were issued -for a general levy of benevolences from the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">30</span> -shires. Thus, one by one, even the most flagrant -of the abuses he had promised to abolish, -were resorted to without hesitation and without -scruple.</p> - -<p>Not less flagrant were the abuses of a religious -nature. The Commons, in the last moments -of the session of 1629, had resolved that -“whoever should bring in innovations in religion,” -as well as “whoever advised the levy of -subsidies not granted in Parliament,” was to be -regarded as “a capital enemy of the kingdom -and commonwealth.” And yet it was to “bring -in innovations in religion” that the energies of -the English church were now chiefly directed. -At the head of the church was Archbishop -Laud, whose determination was “to raise the -Church of England to what he conceived to be -its real position as a branch, though a reformed -branch, of the great Catholic church throughout -the world.” He protested alike against the innovations -of Rome and the innovations of -Calvin. In his view the Episcopal succession -was the essence of the church; and, therefore,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">31</span> -when the Lutheran and Calvanistic churches rejected -the office of Bishop, they “ceased to be -churches at all.” As he rejected the church of -the reformers, and as he acknowledged Rome -as a true branch of the church, he drew constantly -nearer to Rome, and removed further and -further from the doctrines of the Reformers. -In all parts of England ministers who refused -to conform were expelled from their cures. It -was this aggressive and revolutionary policy -that drove thousands of Puritans to New -England. Three thousand emigrants left England -in a single year; and during the period -between 1629 and 1640 no less than about -twenty thousand Puritans found a refuge in the -New World.</p> - -<p>In Scotland resistance to the innovations of -Laud took a more active turn. Royal proclamation -had been made, reinstating the Episcopal -forms; but when the Dean of Edinburgh -opened the new Prayer Book, a murmur of discontent -ran through the congregation, and a -stool, hurled by one of the members, felled him<span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">32</span> -to the ground. Petitions for the removal of the -Prayer Book were showered in upon the court. -Various writers were dragged before the Star -Chamber and branded as “trumpets of sedition.” -To a petition presented by the Duke of -Hamilton the King replied: “I will rather die -than yield to these impertinent and damnable -demands.” Of these seething discontents, what -is sometimes called the “Bishops’ War” was -the result. The King was determined to suppress -opposition by force of arms, and for that -purpose he committed the fatal error of calling -over Strafford from Ireland. Scotland at once -arose to resist him, while at his back all England -was at the point of revolt. A London -mob burst into the Bishop’s palace at Lambeth, -and then proceeded to break up the sittings of -the High Commission at St. Paul’s. Charles, -finding the army in no condition to cope with -the discontents of the time, at length, with -great reluctance, yielded to his advisers, and -once more summoned the Houses of Parliament.</p> - -<p>In April of 1640, the newly-elected members<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">33</span> -came together. During the eleven years that -had elapsed since the dismissal of the Parliament -of 1629, many of the old leaders had -passed away. Sir Edward Coke and Sir Robert -Philips were dead, and Eliot had perished as a -martyr in prison. But in the meantime a new -leader had appeared. By the consent of all, -that distinction was now held by John Pym. -This gentleman, now fifty-four years of age, -had been the companion of Eliot in the third -Parliament of Charles, and, next to Eliot and -Wentworth, had been acknowledged the most -effective speaker in that body. But in the -course of the past eleven years his talents and -his energy had caused him everywhere to be -hailed as the popular leader. He was a gentleman -of good family, a graduate of Oxford, and -an Episcopalian in religion. His influence was -probably all the greater because he did not belong -to the extreme party. We are told that -he was no fanatic, that he was genial and even -convivial in his nature. He has been called by -Mr. Forster the first great popular organizer in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">34</span> -English politics. In company with Hampden -he rode through several of the English counties, -as Anthony Wood states, “with a view of promoting -elections of the puritanical brethren.” -He urged the people to meet and send petitions -to Parliament, and by him the custom of petitioning -was first organized into a system. -When the new House of Commons was called -to order every one looked to Pym as by a common -instinct for guidance.</p> - -<p>The speech with which Pym responded to -this expectation is doubtless one of the most -remarkable in the history of British eloquence. -It abounds in passages which, for weight of -argument and closeness of reasoning, remind -one of the compositions of Lord Bacon. -Throughout the whole there is a precision of -statement, and a gravity of manner that show -plainly enough that he was not unconscious of -the responsibility that rested upon him. The -speech has been a matter of general comment -with all the historians of the period, for there is -abundant evidence of its extraordinary influence<span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">35</span> -on Parliament and on the people of England. -And yet, until within a few years, no -complete copy of it was known to be in existence. -Several mutilated versions were published -in the seventeenth century, but these -conveyed a very imperfect impression of its -power. Mr. May, the historian of the Long -Parliament says that “Mr. Pym, a grave and -religious gentleman, in a long speech of almost -two hours, recited a catalogue of grievances -which at that time lay heavy on the commonwealth, -of which many abbreviated copies, as -extracting the heads only, were with great -greediness taken by gentleman and others -throughout the kingdom, for it was not then -the fashion to print speeches in Parliament.” -These “abbreviated copies” “of heads only,” -were until recently supposed to be the only -reports of the speech in existence. But Mr. -Forster, when writing his Life of Pym, was led -to institute a careful search among the world of -papers in the British Museum; and his effort was -rewarded with success. He discovered a report<span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">36</span> -of the speech with corrections by Pym’s own -hand. This version, corrected by the orator -himself, is the one here reproduced. It is somewhat -abridged by Mr. Forster; and the report -given in the third person is preserved. In -unabbreviated form it has never been published.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">37</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="JOHN_PYM2">JOHN PYM.<br /> - -<span class="subhead">ON THE SUBJECT OF GRIEVANCES IN THE REIGN OF<br /> -CHARLES I. <span class="in1">HOUSE OF COMMONS.</span><br />APRIL 5, 1640.</span></h2> -</div> - -<blockquote class="end"> - -<p>After an interval of eleven years since the dissolution of the -Third Parliament of Charles I., the Fourth or Short Parliament -was opened by the King on the 3d of April, 1640. In -his opening speech, Charles simply said: “My Lords and -Gentlemen: There never was a king that had a more great -and weighty cause to call his people together than myself: I -will not trouble you with the particulars. I have informed -my Lord Keeper, and command him to speak, and desire -your attention.” After this short and ungracious declaration, -the Lord Keeper proceeded to speak in a very lofty and absurd -strain in regard to the Royal Prerogative, and ending with the -admonition, “that his Majesty did not expect advice from -them, much less that they should interfere in any office of -mediation, which would not be grateful to him: but that they -should, as soon as might be, give his Majesty a supply, and -that he would give them time enough afterwards to represent -grievances to him.”</p> - -<p>Two days later, as soon as Parliament assembled, a -number of petitions were presented, “complaining of ship-money -projects and monopolies, the star-chamber and high-commission -courts and other grievances.” Between the consideration<span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">38</span> -of these petitions and deference to the King’s request -to grant supplies at once, there was a hesitation; and it was of -this sense of “divided duty” that Pym determined to avail -himself. Clarendon says: “Whilst men gazed upon each -other, looking who should begin (much the greater part having -never before sat in Parliament) Mr. Pym, a man of good reputation, -but much better known afterwards, who had been as -long in these assemblies as any man then living, broke the ice, -and in a set discourse of about two hours,” addressed the -House.</p></blockquote> - -<p>Never Parliament had greater business to dispatch, -nor more difficulties to encounter; therefore -we have reason to take all advantages of -order and address, and hereby we shall not -only do our own work, but dispose and inable -ourselves for the better satisfaction of his -Majesty’s desire of supply. The grievances -being removed, our affections will carry us with -speed and cheerfulness, to give his Majesty that -which may be sufficient both for his honor and -support. Those that in the very first place -shall endeavor to redress the grievances, will be -found not to hinder, but to be the best furtherers -of his Majesty’s service. He that takes -away weights, doth as much advantage motion, -as he that addeth wings. Divers pieces -of this main work have been already propounded; -his endeavor should be to present to -the House a model of the whole. In the creation,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">39</span> -God made the world according to that -idea or form which was eternally preëxistent in -the Divine mind. Moses was commanded to -frame the tabernacle after the pattern showed -him in the mount. Those actions are seldom -well perfected in the execution, which are not -first well moulded in the design and proposition.</p> - -<p>He said he would labor to contract those manifold -affairs both of the Church and State, which -did so earnestly require the wisdom and faithfulness -of this House, into a double method of -grievances and cures. And because there -wanted not some who pretended that these -things, wherewith the commonwealth is now -grieved, are much for the advantage of the -King, and that the redress of them will be to -his Majesty’s great disadvantage and loss, he -doubted not but to make it appear, that in discovering -the present great distempers and disorders, -and procuring remedy for them, we -should be no less serviceable to his Majesty, -who hath summoned us to this great council -than useful to those whom we do here represent. -For the better effecting whereof, he propounded -three main branches of his discourse. -In the first, he would offer them the several<span class="pagenum" id="Page_40">40</span> -heads of some principal grievances, under which -the kingdom groaned. In the second, he undertook -to prove that the disorders from -whence those grievances issued, were as hurtful -to the King as to the people. In the -third, he would advise such a way of healing, -and removing those grievances, as might be -equally effectual to maintain the honor and -greatness of the King, and to procure the prosperity -and contentment of the people.</p> - -<p>In the handling whereof he promised to use -such expressions as might mitigate the sharpness -and bitterness of those things whereof he -was to speak, so far as his duty and faithfulness -would allow. It is a great prerogative to the -King, and a great honor attributed to him, in a -maxim of our law, that he can do no wrong; -he is the fountain of justice; and, if there be -any injustice in the execution of his commands, -the law casts it upon the ministers, and frees -the King.</p> - -<p>Activity, life, and vigor are conveyed into -the sublunary creatures by the influence of -heaven; but the malignity and distemper, the -cause of so many epidemical diseases, do proceed -from the noisome vapors of the earth, or -some ill-affected qualities of the air, without<span class="pagenum" id="Page_41">41</span> -any infection or alteration of those pure, celestial, -and incorruptible bodies. In the like -manner, he said, the authority, the power, and -countenance of princes, may concur in the actions -of evil men, without partaking in the -injustice and obliquity of them. These matters -whereof we complain, have been presented to his -Majesty, either under the pretence of royal prerogatives, -which he is bound to maintain, or of -public good, which is the most honorable object -of regal wisdom. But the covetous and ambitious -designs of others have interposed betwixt -his royal intentions and the happiness of his -people, making those things pernicious and -hurtful, which his Majesty apprehended as just -and profitable.</p> - -<p>He said, the things which he was to propound -were of a various nature, many of them such -as required a very tender and exquisite consideration. -In handling of which, as he would -be bold to use the liberty of the place and -relation wherein he stood, so he would be very -careful to express that modesty and humility -which might be expected by those of whose -actions he was to speak. And if his judgment -or his tongue should slip into any particular -mistake, he would not think it so great a shame<span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">42</span> -to fail by his own weakness as he should esteem -it an honor and advantage to be corrected by -the wisdom of that House to which he submitted -himself, with this protestation, that he -desired no reformation as much as to reform -himself.</p> - -<p>The greatest liberty of the kingdom is religion; -thereby we are freed from spiritual -evils, and no impositions are so grievous as -those that are laid upon the soul.</p> - -<p>The next great liberty is justice, whereby we -are preserved from injuries in our persons and -estates; from this is derived into the commonwealth, -peace, and order, and safety; and -when this is interrupted, confusion and danger -are ready to overwhelm all.</p> - -<p>The third great liberty consists in the power -and privilege of parliaments; for this is the -fountain of law, the great council of the kingdom, -the highest court; this is inabled by the -legislative and conciliary power, to prevent -evils to come; by the judiciary power, to suppress -and remove evils present. If you consider -these three great liberties in the order of -dignity, this last is inferior to the other two, as -means are inferior to the end; but, if you consider -them in the order of necessity and use,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_43">43</span> -this may justly claim the first place in our care, -because the end cannot be obtained without -the means: and if we do not preserve this, we -cannot long hope to enjoy either of the others. -Therefore being to speak of those grievances -which lie upon the kingdom, he would observe -this order.</p> - -<p>1. To mention those which were against -the privilege of parliaments. 2. Those which -were prejudicial to the religion established in -the kingdom. 3. Those which did interrupt -the justice of the realm in the liberty of our -persons and propriety of our estates.</p> - -<p>The privileges of Parliament were not given -for the ornament or advantage of those who -are the members of Parliament.<a id="FNanchor_10" href="#Footnote_10" class="fnanchor">10</a> They have a -real use and efficacy toward that which is the -end of parliaments. We are free from suits -that we may the more entirely addict ourselves -to the public services; we have, therefore, -liberty of speech, that our counsels may not be -corrupted with fear, or our judgments perverted -with self respects. Those three great faculties -and functions of Parliament, the legislative, -judiciary, and conciliary power,<a id="FNanchor_11" href="#Footnote_11" class="fnanchor">11</a> cannot be well -exercised without such privileges as these. The -wisdom of our laws, the faithfulness of our<span class="pagenum" id="Page_44">44</span> -counsels, the righteousness of our judgments, -can hardly be kept pure and untainted if they -proceed from distracted and restrained minds.</p> - -<p>It is a good rule of the moral philosopher,—<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Et -non lædas mentem gubernatricem omnium -actionum</i>. These powers of Parliament are to -the body politic as the rational faculties of the -soul to a man; that which keeps all the parts -of the commonwealth in frame and temper, -ought to be most carefully preserved in that -freedom, vigor, and activity, which belongs to -itself. Our predecessors in this House have -ever been most careful in the first place to -settle and secure their privileges; and he -hoped, that we, having had greater breaches -made upon us than heretofore, would be no less -tender of them, and forward in seeking reparation -for that which is past, and prevention of -the like for the time to come.</p> - -<p>Then he propounded divers particular points -wherein the privileges of Parliament had been -broken. First, in restraining the members of -the House from speaking. Secondly, in forbidding -the Speaker to put any question.</p> - -<p>These two were practiced the last day of the -last Parliament (and, as was alleged, by his -Majesty’s command); and both of them trench<span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">45</span> -upon the very life and being of parliaments; -for if such a restraining power as this should -take root, and be admitted, it will be impossible -for us to bring any resolution to perfection -in such matters as shall displease those about -the King.<a id="FNanchor_12" href="#Footnote_12" class="fnanchor">12</a></p> - -<p>Thirdly, by imprisoning divers members of -the House, for matters done in Parliament. -Fourthly, by indictments, informations, and -judgments in ordinary and inferior courts, for -speeches and proceedings in parliaments. -Fifthly, by the disgraceful order of the King’s -bench, whereby some members of this House -were enjoined to put in security of their good -behaviour; and for refusal thereof, were continued -in prison divers years, without any particular -allegation against them. One of them -was freed by death. Others were not dismissed -till his Majesty had declared his intention to -summon the present Parliament. And this he -noted not only as a breach of privilege, but as -a violation of the common justice of the kingdom. -Sixthly, by the sudden and abrupt dissolution -of parliaments, contrary to the law and -custom.</p> - -<p>Often hath it been declared in parliaments, -that the Parliament should not be dissolved,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">46</span> -till the petitions be answered. This (he said) -was a great grievance because it doth prevent -the redress of other grievances. It were a hard -case that a private man should be put to death -without being heard. As this representative -body of the Commons receives a being by the -summons, so it receives a civil death by the -dissolution. Is it not a much more heavy -doom by which we lose our being, to have this -civil death inflicted on us in displeasure, and -not to be allowed time and liberty to answer -for ourselves? That we should not only die, -but have this mark of infamy laid upon us? to -be made intestabiles, disabled to make our wills, -to dispose of our business, as this House hath -always used to do before adjournments or dissolutions? -Yet this hath often been our case! -We have not been permitted to pour out our -last sighs and groans into the bosom of our -dear sovereign. The words of dying men are -full of piercing affections; if we might be heard -to speak, no doubt we should so fully express -our love and faithfulness to our prince, as -might take off the false suggestions and aspersions -of others; at least we should in our -humble supplications recommend some such -things to him in the name of his people, as<span class="pagenum" id="Page_47">47</span> -would make for his own honor, and the public -good of his kingdom.</p> - -<p>Thus he concluded the first sort of grievances, -being such as were against the privilege -of Parliament, and passed on to the next, concerning -religion; all which he conveyed under -these four heads. The first, was the great encouragement -given to popery, of which he produced -these particular evidences. 1. A suspension -of all laws against papists, whereby they -enjoy a free and almost public exercise of -that religion. Those good statutes which were -made for restraint of idolatry and superstition, -are now a ground of security to them in the -practice of both; being used to no other end -but to get money into the King’s purse; which -as it is clearly against the intentions of the law, -so it is full of mischief to the kingdom. By -this means a dangerous party is cherished and -increased, who are ready to close with any opportunity -of disturbing the peace and safety of -the State. Yet he did not desire any new laws -against popery, or any rigorous courses in the -execution of those already in force; he was far -from seeking the ruin of their persons or -estates; only he wished they might be kept -in such a condition as should restrain them from -doing hurt.<a id="FNanchor_13" href="#Footnote_13" class="fnanchor">13</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">48</span> -It may be objected, there are moderate and -discreet men amongst them, men of estates, -such as have an interest in the peace and prosperity -of the kingdom as well as we. These (he -said) were not to be considered according to -their own disposition, but according to the -nature of the body whereof they are parties. -The planets have several and particular motions -of their own, yet they are all rapt and transported -into a contrary course by the superior -orb which comprehends them all. The principles -of popery are such as are incompatible -with any other religion. There may be a suspension -of violence for some by certain respects; -but the ultimate end even of that moderation -is, that they may with more advantage extirpate -that which is opposite to them. Laws will not -restrain them. Oaths will not. The Pope can -dispense with both these, and where there is -occasion, his command will move them to the -disturbance of the realm—against their own -private disposition—yea, against their own -reason and judgement—to obey him; to whom -they have (especially the Jesuitical party) absolutely -and entirely obliged themselves, not only -in spiritual matters, but in temporal, as they are -in order <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">ad spiritualia</i>. Henry III. and Henry<span class="pagenum" id="Page_49">49</span> -IV. of France were no Protestants themselves, -yet were murthered because they tolerated Protestants. -The King and the kingdom can have -no security but in their weakness and disability -to do hurt.</p> - -<p>2. A second encouragement is, their admission -into places of power and trust in the Commonwealth, -whereby they get many dependents -and adherents, not only of their own, but even -of such as make profession to be Protestants.</p> - -<p>3. A third, their freedom of resorting to London -and the court, whereby they have opportunity, -not only of communicating their counsels -and designs, one to another, but of diving -into his Majesty’s counsels, by the frequent -access of those who are active men amongst -them, to the tables and company of great men; -and under subtle pretences and disguises they -want not means of cherishing their own projects, -and of endeavoring to mould and bias -the public affairs to the great advantage of that -party.</p> - -<p>4. A fourth, that as they have a congregation -of cardinals at Rome, to consider of the -aptest ways and means of establishing the -Pope’s authority and religion in England, so -they have a nuncio here, to act and dispose<span class="pagenum" id="Page_50">50</span> -that party to the execution of those counsels, -and, by the assistance of such cunning and -Jesuitical spirits as swarm in this town, to -order and manage all actions and events, to -the furtherance of that main end.<a id="FNanchor_14" href="#Footnote_14" class="fnanchor">14</a></p> - -<p>The second grievance of religion, was from -those manifold innovations lately introduced -into several parts of the kingdom, all inclining to -popery, and disposing and fitting men to entertain -it. The particulars were these: 1. Divers -of the chiefest points of religion in difference -betwixt us and the papists have been publicly -defended, in licensed books, in sermons, in university -acts and disputations. 2. Divers popish -ceremonies have been not only practised but -countenanced, yea, little less than enjoined, -as altars, images, crucifixes, bowings, and other -gestures and observances, which put upon our -churches a shape and face of popery. He compared -this to the dry bones in Ezekiel. First, -they came together; then the sinews and the -flesh came upon them; after this the skin -covered them; and then breath and life was -put into them! So (he said) after these men -had moulded us into an outward form and -visage of popery, they would more boldly endeavor -to breathe into us the spirit of life and -popery.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_51">51</span> -The third grievance was the countenancing -and preferring those men who were most forward -in setting up such innovations; the particulars -were so well known that they needed -not to be named.<a id="FNanchor_15" href="#Footnote_15" class="fnanchor">15</a></p> - -<p>The fourth was, the discouragement of -those who were known to be most conscionable -and faithful professors of the truth. Some of -the ways of effecting this he observed to be -these: 1. The courses taken to enforce and enlarge -those unhappy differences, for matters of -small moment, which have been amongst ourselves, -and to raise up new occasions of further -division, whereby many have been induced to -forsake the land, not seeing the end of those -voluntary and human injunctions in things appertaining -to God’s worship. Those who are -indeed lovers of religion, and of the churches -of God, would seek to make up those breaches, -and to unite us more entirely against the common -enemy. 2. The over rigid prosecution of -those who are scrupulous in using some things -enjoined, which are held by those who enjoin -them, to be in themselves indifferent. It hath -been ever the desire of this House, expressed -in many parliaments in Queen Elizabeth’s time -and since, that such might be tenderly used.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_52">52</span> -It was one of our petitions delivered at Oxford -to his Majesty that now is; but what little -moderation it hath produced is not unknown to -us all! Any other vice almost may be better -endured in a minister than inconformity. 3. -The unjust punishments and vexations of -sundry persons for matters required without -any warrant of law: as, for not reading the book -concerning recreation on the Lord’s day<a id="FNanchor_16" href="#Footnote_16" class="fnanchor">16</a>; -for not removing the communion table to be -set altarwise at the east end of the chancel; -for not coming up to the rails to receive the -sacrament; for preaching the Lord’s day in -the afternoon; for catechising in any other -words and manner than in the precise words -of the short catechism in the common prayer-book.</p> - -<p>The fifth and last grievance concerning religion, -was the encroachment and abuse of -ecclesiastical jurisdiction. The particulars -mentioned were these: 1. Fining and imprisoning -in cases not allowed by law. 2. The challenging -their jurisdiction to be appropriate to -their order, which they allege to be <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">jure divino</i>. -3. The contriving and publishing of new articles, -upon which they force the churchwardens to -take oaths, and to make inquiries and presentments,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">53</span> -as if such articles had the force of canons; -and this was an effect of great presumption -and boldness, not only in the -bishops, but in the archdeacons, officials, and -chancellors, taking upon themselves a kind of -synodal authority. The injunctions of this -kind might, indeed, well partake in name with -that part of the common law which is called the -extravagants!</p> - -<p>Having despatched these several points, he -proceeded to the third kind of grievances, being -such as are against the common justice of the -realm, in the liberty of our persons, and propriety -of our estates, of which he had many -to propound: in doing whereof, he would -rather observe the order of time, wherein they -were acted, than of consequence; but when he -should come to the cure, he should then persuade -the House to begin with those which -were of most importance, as being now in execution, -and very much pressing and exhausting -the commonwealth.</p> - -<p>He began with the tonnage and poundage and -other impositions not warranted by law; and -because these burdens had long lain upon us, -and the principles which produced them are the -same from whence divers others are derived, he<span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">54</span> -thought it necessary to premise a short narrative -and relation of the grounds and proceedings -of the power of imposing herein practised.<a id="FNanchor_17" href="#Footnote_17" class="fnanchor">17</a> -It was a fundamental truth, essential -to the constitution and government of this -kingdom—an hereditary liberty and privilege -of all the freeborn subjects of the land—that no -tax, tallage, or other charge might be laid upon -us, without common consent in Parliament. -This was acknowledged by the Conquerro; -ratified in that contract which he made with -this nation, upon his admittance to the kingdom; -declared and confirmed in the laws which -he published. This hath never been denied by -any of our kings—though broken and interrupted -by some of them, especially by King -John and Henry III. Then, again, it was confirmed -by Mag. Chart., and other succeeding -laws; yet not so well settled but that it was -sometime attempted by the two succeeding -Edwards, in whose times the subjects were -very sensible of all the breaches made upon the -common liberty, and, by the opportunity of -frequent parliaments, pursued them with fresh -complaints, and for the most part found redress, -and procured the right of the subject to be -fortified by new statutes.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_55">55</span> -He observed that those kings, even in the -acts whereby they did break the law, did really -affirm the subject’s liberty, and disclaim that -right of imposing which is now challenged: for -they did usually procure the merchants’ consent -to such taxes as were laid, thereby to put -a color of justice upon their proceeding; and -ordinarily they were limited to a short time, and -then propounded to the ratification of the Parliament, -where they were cancelled or confirmed, -as the necessity and state of the kingdom -did require. But for the most part such -charges upon merchandise were taken by authority -of Parliament, and granted for some -short time, in a greater or lesser proportion, as -was requisite for supply of the public occasions—six -or twelve in the pound, for one, two or -three years, as they saw cause to be employed -for the defence of the sea: and it was acknowledged -so clearly to be in the power of Parliament, -that they have sometimes been granted -to noblemen, and sometimes to merchants, to -be disposed for that use. Afterward they were -granted to the King for life, and so continued -for divers descents, yet still as a gift and grant -of the Commons.</p> - -<p>Betwixt the time of Edward III. and Queen<span class="pagenum" id="Page_56">56</span> -Mary, never prince (that he could remember) -offered to demand any imposition but by grant -in Parliament. Queen Mary laid a charge -upon cloth, by the equity of the statute of tonnage -and poundage, because the rate set upon -wool was much more than upon cloth; and, -there being little wool carried out of the kingdom -unwrought, the Queen thought she had -reason to lay on somewhat more; yet not full -so much as brought them to an equality, but -that still there continued a less charge upon -wool wrought into cloth, than upon wool carried -out unwrought; until King James’ time -when upon Nicholson’s project, there was a -further addition of charge, but still upon pretence -of the statute, which is that we call the -pretermitted custom.</p> - -<p>In Queen Elizabeth’s time, it is true, one or -two little impositions crept in, the general prosperity -of her reign overshadowing small errors -and innovations. One of these was upon currants, -by occasion of the merchants’ complaints -that the Venetians had laid a charge upon the -English cloth, that so we might be even with -them, and force them the sooner to take it off. -But this being demanded by King James, was -denied by one Bates, a merchant, and upon a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_57">57</span> -suit in the exchequer, was adjudged for the -King. Now the manner of that judgment was -thus: There were then but three judges in -that court, all differing from one another in the -grounds of their sentences. The first was of -opinion, the King might impose upon such commodities -as were foreign and superfluous, as -currants were, but not upon such as were native -and to be transported, or necessary, and to -be imported for the use of the kingdom. The -second judge was of opinion, he might impose -upon all foreign merchandise, whether superfluous -or no, but not upon native. The third, -that for as much as the King had the custody -of the ports, and the guard of the seas, and -that he might open and shut up the ports as he -pleased, he had a prerogative to impose upon -all merchandise, both exported and imported. -Yet this single, distracted, and divided judgment, -is the foundation of all the impositions -now in practice; for, after this, King James -laid new charges upon all commodities outward -and inward, not limited to a certain time and -occasion, but reserved to himself, his heirs and -successors, forever,—the first impositions in fee-simple -that were ever heard of in this kingdom. -This judgment, and the right of imposing thereupon<span class="pagenum" id="Page_58">58</span> -assumed, was questioned in septimo and -duodecimo<a id="FNanchor_18" href="#Footnote_18" class="fnanchor">18</a> of that king, and was the cause -of the breach of both those parliaments. In -18 and 21 Jacobi, indeed, it was not agitated by -this House, but only that they might preserve -the favor of the king, for the despatch of some -other great businesses, upon which they were -more especially attentive.<a id="FNanchor_19" href="#Footnote_19" class="fnanchor">19</a> But in the first of -his present Majesty, it necessarily came to be -remembered, upon the proposition on the -King’s part, for renewing the bill of tonnage -and poundage; yet so moderate was that Parliament, -that they thought rather to confirm -the impositions already set by a law to be -made, than to abolish them by a judgment in -Parliament; but that and divers ensuing parliaments -have been unhappily broken, before that -endeavor could be accomplished: only at the -last meeting a remonstrance was made concerning -the liberty of the subject in this point; and -it hath always been expressed to be the meaning -of the House, and so it was (as he said) his -own meaning in the proposition now made, to -settle and restore the right according to law, -and not to diminish the king’s profit, but to establish -it by a free grant in Parliament.</p> - -<p>However, since the breach of the last Parliament,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_59">59</span> -his majesty hath, by a new book of rates, -very much increased the burden upon merchandise, -and now tonnage and poundage, old and -new impositions, are all taken by prerogative, -without any grant in Parliament, or authority -of law, as we conceive; from whence divers inconveniences -and mischiefs are produced. 1. -The danger of the precedent, that a judgment -in one court, and in one case, is made binding -to all the kingdom. 2. Men’s goods are seized, -their legal suits are stopped, and justice denied -to those that desire to take the benefit of the -law. 3. The great sums of money received upon -these impositions, intended for the guard of -the seas, claimed and defended upon no ground -but of public trust, for protection of merchants -and defence of the ports, are dispersed to other -uses, and a new tax raised for the same purposes. -4. These burdens are so excessive, that -trade is thereby very much hindered, the commodities -of our own growth extremely abased, -and those imported much enhanced; all which -lies not upon the merchant alone, but upon the -generality of the subject; and by this means -the stock of the kingdom is much diminished, -our exportation being less profitable, and our -importation more changeable. And if the wars<span class="pagenum" id="Page_60">60</span> -and troubles in the neighbor parts had not -brought almost the whole stream of trade into -this kingdom, we should have found many more -prejudical effects of these impositions, long before -this time, than yet we have done. Especially -they have been insupportable to the poor -plantations, whither many of his Majesty’s subjects -have been transported, in divers parts of -the continent and islands of America, in furtherance -of a design tending to the honor of the -kingdom, and the enlargement of his Majesty’s -dominions. The adventurers in this noble -work have for the most part no other support -but tobacco, upon which such a heavy rate is -set, that the King receives twice as much as the -true value of the commodity to the owner. 5. -Whereas these great burdens have caused -divers merchants to apply themselves to a way -of traffic abroad by transporting goods from -one country to another, without bringing them -home into England. But now it hath been -lately endeavored to set an imposition upon -this trade, so that the King will have a duty -even out of those commodities which never -come within his dominions, to the great discouragement -of such active and industrious -men.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_61">61</span> -The next general head of civil grievances, -was enforcing men to compound for knighthood; -which though it may seem past, because -it is divers years since it was used, yet upon -the same grounds the King may renew it, as -often as he pleaseth, for the composition looks -backward, and the offence continuing, is subject -to a new fine. The state of that business -he laid down thus: Heretofore, when the services -due by tenure were taken in kind, it were -fit there were some way of trial and approbation -of those that were bound to such services. -Therefore, it was ordained, that such as were to -do knight’s services, after they came of age, -and had possession of their lands, should be -made knights; that is, publicly declared to be -fit for that service:—divers ceremonies and solemnities -were in use for this purpose; and if -by the party’s neglect this was not done, he -was punishable by fine; there being in those -times an ordinary and open way to get knighthood, -for those who were born to it. Now it is -quite true, that although the use of this hath -for divers ages been discontinued, yet there -have passed very few kings under whom there -hath not been a general summons, requiring -those who had lands of such value as the law<span class="pagenum" id="Page_62">62</span> -prescribes, to appear at the coronation, or some -other great solemnity, and to be knighted, and -yet nothing intended but the getting of some -small fines. So this grievance is not altogether -new in the kind; but it is new in the manner, -and in the excess of it, and that in divers -respects. 1. First, it hath been extended beyond -all intention and color of law. Not only -inn-holders, but likewise leaseholders, copyholders, -merchants, and others; scarce any man -free from it. 2. The fines have been immoderate, -far beyond the proportion of former -times.<a id="FNanchor_20" href="#Footnote_20" class="fnanchor">20</a> 3. The proportion has been without -any example, precedent, or rule of justice. For -though those that were summoned did appear, -yet distresses infinite were made out against -them, and issues increased and multiplied, and -no way open to discharge those issues, by plea -or otherwise, but only by compounding with -the commissioners at their own pleasure.</p> - -<p>The third general head of civil grievances was, -the great inundation of monopolies: whereby -heavy burthens are laid, not only upon foreign, -but also native commodities. These began in -the soap patent. The principal undertakers in -this were divers Popish recusants, men of estate -and quality, such as in likelihood did not only<span class="pagenum" id="Page_63">63</span> -aim at their private gain, but that by this open -breach of law, the King and his people might -be more fully divided, and the ways of Parliament -men more thoroughly obstructed. -Amongst the infinite inconveniences and mischiefs -which this did produce, these few may -be observed: 1. The impairing the goodness, -and enhancing the price of most of the commodities -and manufactures of the realm, yea, of -those which are of most necessary and common -use, as salt, soap, beer, coals, and infinite others. -2. That, under color of licenses, trades and -manufactures are restrained to a few hands, and -many of the subjects deprived of their ordinary -way of livelihood. 3. That, upon such illegal -grants, a great number of persons had -been unjustly vexed by pursuivants, imprisonments, -attendance upon the council table, forfeiture -of goods, and many other ways.</p> - -<p>The fourth head of civil grievances was that -great and unparalleled grievance of the ship -money, which, though it may seem to have -more warrant of law than the rest, because -there hath a judgment passed for it, yet in -truth it is thereby aggravated, if it be considered -that the judgment is founded upon the -naked opinion of some judges without any<span class="pagenum" id="Page_64">64</span> -written law, without any custom, or authority -of law books, yea, without any one precedent -for it.<a id="FNanchor_21" href="#Footnote_21" class="fnanchor">21</a> Many express laws, many declarations -in parliaments, and the constant practice and -judgment at all times being against it! Yea, -in the very nature of it, it will be found to be -disproportionable to the case of “necessity” -which is pretended to be the ground of it! -Necessity excludes all formalities and solemnities. -It is no time then to make levies and -taxes to build and prepare ships. Every man’s -person, every man’s ships are to be employed -for the resisting of an invading enemy. The -right on the subject’s part was so clear, and the -pretences against it so weak, that he thought -no man would venture his reputation or conscience -in the defence of that judgment, being -so contrary to the grounds of the law, to the -practice of former times, and so inconsistent in -itself.</p> - -<p>Amongst many inconveniences and obliquities -of this grievance, he noted these: 1. That -it extendeth to all persons, and to all times; it -subjecteth our goods to distress, and our persons -to imprisonment; and, the causes of it -being secret and invisible, referred to his -Majesty’s breast alone, the subject was left<span class="pagenum" id="Page_65">65</span> -without possibility of exception and relief. 2. -That there were no rules or limits for the proportion; -so that no man knew what estate he -had, or how to order his course or expenses. -3. That it was taken out of the subject’s purse -by a writ, and brought into the King’s coffers -by instructions from the lords of his most honorable -privy council. Now, in the legal defence -of it, the writ only did appear; of the instructions -there was no notice taken, which yet in -the real execution of it were most predominant. -It carries the face of service in the writ, and of -revenue in the instructions. Why, if this way -had not been found to turn the ship into money, -it would easily have appeared how incompatible -this service is with the office of a sheriff, in -the inland counties; and how incongruous and -inconvenient for the inhabitants! The law in a -body politic is like nature, which always prepareth -and disposeth proper and fit instruments -and organs for every natural operation. If the -law had intended any such charge as this, there -should have been certain rules, suitable means, -and courses, for the levying and managing of it.</p> - -<p>The fifth head was the enlargement of the -forests beyond the bounds and perambulations<a id="FNanchor_22" href="#Footnote_22" class="fnanchor">22</a> -appointed and established by act of Parliament,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_66">66</span> -27 and 28 Edward I.; and this is done upon the -very reasons and exceptions which had been on -the King’s part propounded, and by the Commons -answered, in Parliament, not long after -that establishment. It is not unknown to -many in this House that those perambulations -were the fruit and effect of that famous charter -which is called “Charta de Forrestâ,” whereby -many tumults, troubles, and discontents had -been taken away, and composed between the -King and his subjects; and it is full of danger, -that by reviving those old questions, we may -fall into the like distempers. Hereby, however, -no blame could fall upon that great lord, who -is now justice in Eyre, and in whose name -these things were acted; it could not be expected -that he should take notice of the laws -and customs of the realm; therefore he was -careful to procure the assistance and direction -of the judges; and if any thing were done -against law, it was for them to answer, and not -for him.</p> - -<p>The particular irregularities and obliquities -of this business were these:—1. The surreptitious -procuring a verdict for the King; without -giving notice to the country whereby they -might be prepared to give in evidence for their<span class="pagenum" id="Page_67">67</span> -own interest and indemnity, as was done in -Essex. 2. Whereas the judges in the justice -seat in Essex were consulted with about the -entry of the former verdict, and delivered their -opinion touching that alone, without meddling -with the point of right; this opinion was after -enforced in other counties as if it had been a -judgment upon the matter, and the council for -the county discountenanced in speaking, because -it was said to be already adjudged. 3. -The inheritance of divers of the subjects have -been hereupon disturbed, after the quiet possession -of three or four hundred years, and a -way opened for the disturbance of many others. -4. Great sums of money have been drawn from -such as have lands within these pretended -bounds, and those who have forborne to make -composition have been threatened with the execution -of these forest laws. 5. The fifth was the -selling of nuisances, or at least some such things -as are supposed to be nuisances. The King, as -father of the commonwealth, is to take care of -the public commodities and advantages of his -subjects, as rivers, highways, common sewers, -and suchlike, and is to remove whatsoever is prejudicial -to them; and for the trial of those there -are legal and ordinary writs of <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">ad quod damnum</i>;<span class="pagenum" id="Page_68">68</span> -but of late a new and extrajudicial way hath -been taken, of declaring matters to be nuisances; -and divers have thereupon been questioned, and -if they would not compound, they have been -fined; if they do compound, that which was first -prosecuted as a common nuisance is taken into -the King’s protection and allowed to stand; -and having yielded the King money, no further -care is taken whether it be good or bad for the -commonwealth. By this a very great and public -trust is either broken or abused. If the -matter compounded for be truly a nuisance, -then it is broken to the hurt of the people; if -it be not a nuisance, then it is abused to the -hurt of the party. The particulars mentioned -were:—First, the commission for buildings in -and about this town, which heretofore hath -been presented by this House as a grievance in -King James’ time, but now of late the execution -hath been much more frequent and prejudicial -than it was before. Secondly, commission -for depopulation,<a id="FNanchor_23" href="#Footnote_23" class="fnanchor">23</a> which began some few -years since, and is still in hot prosecution. By -both these the subject is restrained from disposing -of his own. Some have been commanded to -demolish their houses; others have been forbidden -to build; others, after great trouble and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_69">69</span> -vexation, have been forced to redeem their -peace with large sums, and they still remain, by -law, as liable to a new question as before; for -it is agreed by all that the King cannot license -a common nuisance; and although indeed these -are not such, yet it is a matter of very ill consequence -that, under that name, they should be -compounded for, and may in ill times hereafter -be made a precedent for the Kings of this realm -to claim a power of licensing such things as are -nuisances indeed.<a id="FNanchor_24" href="#Footnote_24" class="fnanchor">24</a></p> - -<p>The seventh great civil grievance hath been, -the military charges laid upon the several -counties of the kingdom; sometimes by warrant -under his Majesty’s signature, sometimes -by letters from the council table, and sometimes -(such had been the boldness and presumption -of some men), by the order of the Lord Lieutenants, -or deputy-lieutenant alone. This is a -growing evil; still multiplying and increasing -from a few particulars to many, from small -sums to great. It began first to be practised -as a loan, for supply of coat and conduct -money; and for this it hath some countenance -from the use in Queen Elizabeth’s time, when -the lords of the council did often desire the -deputy-lieutenants to procure so much money<span class="pagenum" id="Page_70">70</span> -to be laid out in the country as the service did -require, with a promise to pay it again in London; -for which purpose there was a constant -warrant in the exchequer. This was the -practice in her time, and in a great part of -King James’. But the payments were then so -certain, as it was little otherwise than taking up -money upon bills of exchange. At this day -they follow these precedents in the manner of -the demand (for it is with a promise of a repayment), -but not in the certainty and readiness -of satisfaction.</p> - -<p>The first particular brought into a tax (as he -thought) was the muster master’s wages, at -which many repined; but being for small sums, -it began to be generally digested; yet, in the -last Parliament, this House was sensible of it, -and to avoid the danger of the precedent that -the subjects should be forced to make any payments -without consent in Parliament, they -thought upon a bill that might be a rule to the -lieutenants what to demand, and to the people -what to pay. But the hopes of this bill were -dashed in the dissolution of that Parliament. -Now of late divers other particulars are growing -into practise, which make the grievance -much more heavy. Those mentioned were<span class="pagenum" id="Page_71">71</span> -these: 1. Pressing men against their will, and -forcing them which are rich or unwilling to -serve, to find others in their place. 2. The -provision of public magazines for powder, and -other munition, spades and pickaxes. 3. The -salary of divers officers besides the muster master. -4. The buying of cart-horses and carts, -and hiring of carts for carriages.</p> - -<p>The eighth head of civil grievances was the -extrajudicial declarations of judges, whereby -the subjects have been bound in matters of -great importance without hearing of counsel or -argument on their part, and are left without -legal remedy, by writ of error or otherwise. He -remembered the expression used by a former -member of the House, of a “teeming parliament.” -This, he said, was a teeming grievance; -from hence have issued most of the great -grievances now in being. The ship-money—the -pretended nuisances already mentioned—and -some others which have not yet been touched -upon,—especially that concerning the proceedings -of ecclesiastical courts.</p> - -<p>The ninth general head was—that the authority -and wisdom of the council table have -been applied to the contriving and managing -of several monopolies, and other great grievances.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_72">72</span> -The institution of the council-table was -much for the advantage and security of the -subject, to avoid surreptitious and precipitate -courts in the great affairs of the kingdom. But -by law an oath should be taken by all those of -the King’s council, in which, amongst other -things it is expressed that they should for no -cause forbear to do right to all the King’s -people. If such an oath be not now taken, he -wished it might be brought into use again.</p> - -<p>It was the honor of that table, to be, as it -were, incorporated with the King; his royal -power and greatness did shine most conspicuously -in their actions and in their counsels. -We have heard of projectors and referees heretofore; -and what opinion and relish they have -found in this House is not unknown.<a id="FNanchor_25" href="#Footnote_25" class="fnanchor">25</a> But that -any such thing should be acted by the council-table -which might give strength and countenance -to monopolies, as it hath not been used -till now of late, so it cannot be apprehended -without the just grief of the honest subject, and -encouragement of those who are ill affected. -He remembered that <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">in tertio</i> of this king, a -noble gentleman, then a very worthy member -of the Commons’ House, now a great lord and -eminent counsellor of State, did in this place<span class="pagenum" id="Page_73">73</span> -declare an opinion concerning that clause used -to be inserted in patents of monopoly, whereby -justices of peace are commanded to assist -the patentees; and that he urged it to be a -great dishonor to those gentlemen which are in -commission to be so meanly employed—with -how much more reason may we, in jealousy of -the honor of the council-table, humbly desire -that their precious time, their great abilities, -designed to the public care and service of the -kingdom, may not receive such a stain, such a -diminution as to be employed in matters of so -ill report, in the estimation of the law; of so ill -effect in the apprehension of the people!</p> - -<p>The tenth head of civil grievances was comprised -in the high court of star chamber, which -some think succeeded that which in the parliament -rolls is called <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">magnum concilium</i>, and to -which parliaments were wont so often to refer -those important matters which they had no -time to determine. But now this court, which -in the late restoration or erection of it in Henry -VII.’s time, was especially designed to restrain -the oppression of great men, and to remove the -obstructions and impediments of the law,—this, -which is both a court of counsel and a court of -justice—hath been made an instrument of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_74">74</span> -erecting and defending monopolies and other -grievances; to set a face of right upon those -things which are unlawful in their own nature; -a face of public good upon such as are pernicious -in their use and execution. The soap-patent -and divers other evidences thereof may be -given, so well known as not to require a particular -relation. And as if this were not enough, -this court hath lately intermeddled with the -ship money! divers sheriffs have been questioned -for not levying and collecting such sums -as their counties have been charged with; and -if this beginning be not prevented, the star -chamber will become a court of revenue, and it -shall be made crime not to collect or pay such -taxes as the State shall require!</p> - -<p>The eleventh head of civil grievance was -now come to. He said, he was gone very high, -yet he must go a little higher. That great and -most eminent power of the King, of making -edicts and proclamations, which are said to be -<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">leges temporis</i>, and by means of which our -princes have used to encounter with such sudden -and unexpected danger, as would not endure -so much delay, as assembling the great -council of the kingdom—this, which is one of -the most glorious beams of majesty, most rigorous<span class="pagenum" id="Page_75">75</span> -in commanding reverence and subjection, -hath, to our unspeakable grief, been often exercised -of late for the enjoining and maintaining -sundry monopolies and other grants; exceeding -burdensome and prejudicial to the people.</p> - -<p>The twelfth next. Now, although he was -come as high as he could upon earth, yet the -presumption of evil men did lead him one step -higher—even as high as heaven—as high as the -throne of God! It was now (he said) grown -common for ambitious and corrupt men of the -clergy to abuse the truth of God and the bond -of conscience; preaching down the laws and -liberties of the kingdom; and pretending divine -authority for an absolute power in the King, to -do what he would with our persons and goods. -This hath been so often published in sermons -and printed books, that it is now the highway -to preferment!</p> - -<p>In the last parliament we had a sentence of -an offence of this kind against one Manwaring, -then a doctor, now a bishop; concerning -whom (he said) he would say no more but this, -that when he saw him at that bar, in the most -humble and dejected posture that ever he observed, -he thought he would not so soon have -leaped into a bishop’s chair! But his success<span class="pagenum" id="Page_76">76</span> -hath emboldened others; therefore (he said) -this may well be noted as a double grievance, -that such doctrine should be allowed, and that -such men should be preferred; yea, as a root of -grievances, whereby they endeavor to corrupt -the King’s conscience, and, as much as in them -lies, to deprive the people of that royal protection -to which his Majesty is bound by the -fundamental laws of the kingdom, and by his -own personal oath.</p> - -<p>The thirteenth head of civil grievences he -would thus express: The long intermission of -parliaments, contrary to the two statutes yet -in force, whereby it is appointed there should -be parliaments once a year, at the least; and -most contrary to the public good of the kingdom; -since, this being well remedied, it would -generate remedies for all the rest.</p> - -<p>Having gone through the several heads of -grievances, he came to the second main branch, -propounded in the beginning; that the disorders -from whence these grievances issued were -as hurtful to the King as to the people, of which -he gave divers reasons.</p> - -<p>1. The interruption of the sweet communion -which ought to be betwixt the King and -his people, in matters of grace and supply.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_77">77</span> -They have need of him by his general pardon; -to be secured from projectors and informers; -to be freed from obsolete laws; from the -subtle devices of such as seek to restrain -the prerogative to their own private advantage, -and the public hurt; and he hath need -of them for counsel and support in great -and extraordinary occasions. This mutual intercourse, -if indeed sustained, would so weave -the affections and interests of his subjects into -his actions and designs that their wealth and -their persons would be his; his own estate -would be managed to most advantage; and -public undertakings would be prosecuted at the -charge and adventure of the subject. The victorious -attempts in Queen Elizabeth’s time upon -Portugal, Spain, and the Indies, were for the -greatest part made upon the subjects’ purses, -and not upon the Queen’s; though the honor -and profit of the success did most accrue to her.</p> - -<p>2. Those often breaches and discontentments -betwixt the King and the people are very apt -to diminish his reputation abroad, and disadvantage -his treaties and alliances.</p> - -<p>3. The apprehension of the favor and encouragement -given to popery hath much weakened -his Majesty’s party beyond the sea, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_78">78</span> -impaired that advantage which Queen Elizabeth -and his royal father have heretofore made, of -being heads of the Protestant union.</p> - -<p>4. The innovations in religion and rigor of -ecclesiastical courts have forced a great many -of his Majesty’s subjects to forsake the land; -whereby not only their persons and their posterity, -but their wealth and their industry are -lost to this kingdom, much to the reduction, -also, of his Majesty’s customs and subsidies. -And, amongst other inconveniences of such a -sort, this was especially to be observed, that -divers clothiers, driven out of the country, had -set up the manufacture of cloth beyond the -seas; whereby this State is like to suffer much -by abatement of the price of wools, and by -want of employment for the poor; both which -likewise tend to his Majesty’s particular loss.</p> - -<p>5. It puts the King upon improper ways of -supply, which, being not warranted by law, are -much more burdensome to the subject than advantageous -to his Majesty. In France, not long -since, upon a survey of the King’s revenue, it -was found that two parts in three never came -to the King’s purse, but were diverted to the -profit of the officers or ministers of the crown, -and it was thought a very good service and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_79">79</span> -reformation to reduce two parts to the King, -leaving still a third part to the instruments that -were employed about getting it in. It may well -be doubted that the King may have the like or -worse success in England, which appears already -in some particulars. The King, for instance, -hath reserved upon the monopoly of wines -thirty thousand pounds rent a year; the vintner -pays forty shillings a ton, which comes to ninety -thousand pounds; the price upon the subject -by retail is increased two-pence a quart, which -comes to eight pounds a ton, and for forty-five -thousand tons brought in yearly, amounts to -three hundred and sixty thousand pounds; -which is three hundred and thirty thousand -pounds loss to the kingdom, above the King’s -rent! Other monopolies also, as that of soap, -have been very chargeable to the kingdom and -brought very little treasure into his Majesty’s -coffers. Thus it is that the law provides for -that revenue of the crown which is natural and -proper, that it may be safely collected and -brought to account; but this illegal revenue, -being without any such provision, is left to -hazard and much uncertainty, either not to be -retained, or not duly accounted of.</p> - -<p>6. It is apt to weaken the industry and courage<span class="pagenum" id="Page_80">80</span> -of the subject; if they be left uncertain, -whether they shall reap the benefit of their -own pains and hazard. Those who are brought -into the condition of slaves will easily grow to -a slavish disposition, who, having nothing to -lose, do commonly shew more boldness in disturbing -than defending a kingdom.</p> - -<p>7. These irregular courses do give opportunity -to ill instruments, to insinuate themselves -into the King’s service, for we cannot but observe, -that if a man be officious in furthering -their inordinate burdens of ship money, monopolies, -and the like, it varnisheth over all -other faults, and makes him fit both for employment -and preferment; so that out of their -offices, they are furnished for vast expenses, -purchases, buildings; and the King loseth often -more in desperate debts at their death, than he -got by them all their lives. Whether this were -not lately verified in a western man, much employed -while he lived, he leaves to the knowledge -of those who were acquainted with his -course; and he doubted not but others might -be found in the like case. The same course, -again, has been pursued with those that are affected -to popery, to profaneness, and to superstitious -innovations in matters of religion. All<span class="pagenum" id="Page_81">81</span> -kinds of spies and intelligencers, have means to -be countenanced and trusted if they will be but -zealous in these kind of services, which, how -much it detracts from his Majesty, in honor, -in profit, and prosperity of public affairs, lies -open to every man’s apprehension. And from -these reasons or some of them, he thought it -proceeded, that through the whole course of -the English story it might be observed, that -those kings who had been most respectful of -the laws, had been most eminent in greatness, -in glory, and success, both at home and abroad; -and that others, who thought to subsist by the -violation of them, did often fall into a state of -weakness, poverty, and infortunity.</p> - -<p>8. The differences and discontents betwixt -his Majesty and the people at home, have in -all likelihood diverted his royal thoughts and -counsels from those great opportunities which -he might have, not only to weaken the House -of Austria, and to restore the palatinate, but to -gain himself a higher pitch of power and greatness -than any of his ancestors. For it is not -unknown how weak, how distracted, how discontented -the Spanish colonies are in the -West Indies. There are now in those parts -in New England, Virginia, and the Caribbean<span class="pagenum" id="Page_82">82</span> -Islands, and in the Bermudas, at least sixty -thousand able persons of this nation, many of -them well armed, and their bodies seasoned to -that climate, which with a very small charge, -might be set down in some advantageous parts -of these pleasant, rich, and fruitful countries, -and easily make his Majesty master of all that -treasure, which not only foments the war, but -is the great support of popery in all parts of -Christendom.</p> - -<p>9. And lastly, those courses are likely to produce -such distempers in the State as may not be -settled without great charge and loss; by which -means more may be consumed in a few months -than shall be gotten by such ways in many years.</p> - -<p>Having thus passed through the two first -general branches, he was now come to the -third, wherein he was to set down the ways of -healing and removing those grievances which -consisted of two main branches: first, in declaring -the law where it was doubtful; the -second, in better provision for the execution of -law, where it is clear. But (he said) because he -had already spent much time, and begun to -find some confusion in his memory,<a id="FNanchor_26" href="#Footnote_26" class="fnanchor">26</a> he would -refer the particulars to another opportunity, -and for the present only move that which was<span class="pagenum" id="Page_83">83</span> -general to all, and which would give weight and -advantage to all the particular ways of redress. -That is, that we should speedily desire a conference -with the lords, and acquaint them with -the miserable condition wherein we find the -Church and State; and as we have already resolved -to join in a religious seeking of God, in -a day of fast and humiliation, so to entreat -them to concur with us in a parliamentary -course of petitioning the King, as there should -be occasion; and in searching out the causes and -remedies of these many insupportable grievances -under which we lie. That so, by the united -wisdom and authority of both Houses, such -courses may be taken as (through God’s blessing) -may advance the honor and greatness of -his Majesty, and restore and establish the peace -and prosperity of the kingdom.</p> - -<p>This, he said, we might undertake with comfort -and hope of success; for though there be -a darkness upon the land, a thick and palpable -darkness, like that of Egypt, yet, as in that, the -sun had not lost his light, nor the Egyptians -their sight (the interruption was only in the -medium), so with us, there is still (God be -thanked) light in the sun—wisdom and justice -in his Majesty—to dispel this darkness; and in -us there remains a visual faculty, whereby we<span class="pagenum" id="Page_84">84</span> -are enabled to apprehend, and moved to desire, -light. And when we shall be blessed in the -enjoying of it, we shall thereby be incited to -return his Majesty such thanks as may make it -shine more clearly in the world, to his own -glory, and in the hearts of his people, to their -joy and contentment.</p> - -<blockquote class="end"> - -<p>At the conclusion of Pym’s speech, the King’s solicitor, -Herbert, “with all imaginable address,” attempted to call off -the attention of the members from the extraordinary impression -it had made. But the singular moderation no less than -the deadly force of Pym’s statements had created a calm but a -settled determination. A committee was at once appointed to -inquire into violations of privilege; and it was resolved to ask -for a conference on grievances with the Lords. A conference -was held, and the debate continued for two days—that of the -second day continuing from eight in the morning till five in the -afternoon. The King saw that grievances would have to be redressed -before supplies would be granted, and, accordingly, at -an early hour on the following morning, he dissolved Parliament.</p> - -<p>The Revolution was now probably inevitable. The affection -of the people and of the members of Parliament for the King -was fast transformed into distrust, and finally into hostility. -Macaulay in his essays on “Hampden” and “Hallam’s Constitutional -History” has well shown the several steps in the -process of transformation. The King was soon obliged to -summon another Parliament; and when the new members -came together in November of the same year, it was evident -that compromise was no longer possible. The impeachment -and execution of Strafford were soon followed by an attempt -of the King to arrest the leading members of Parliament, and -this attempt in turn was followed by the outbreak of war.</p></blockquote> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_85">85</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="LORD_CHATHAM">LORD CHATHAM.</h2> -</div> - -<p>The elder William Pitt entered the House -of Commons at the age of twenty-six, in the -year 1735. At Eton and at Oxford his energies -had been devoted to a course of study that was -admirably adapted to develop the remarkable -powers for which his name is so well known. -We are told that he was a devoted student of -the classics, that he wrote out again and again -carefully-prepared translations of some of the -great models of ancient oratory, and that in -this way he acquired his easy command of a -forcible and expressive style. His studies in -English, too, were directed to the same end. -He read and reread the sermons of Dr. Barrow, -till he had acquired something of that great -preacher’s copiousness of vocabulary and exactness -of expression. With the same end in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_86">86</span> -view he also performed the extraordinary task -of going twice through Bailey’s Dictionary, examining -every word, and making himself, as far -as possible, complete master of all the shades -of its significance. Joined to these efforts was -also an unusual training in elocution, which -gave him extraordinary command of a remarkable -voice, and made him an actor scarcely inferior -to Garrick himself. It may be doubted -whether any one, since the days of Cicero, has -subjected himself to an equal amount of pure -drudgery in order to fit himself for the duties -of a public speaker.</p> - -<p>When Pitt entered the House of Commons, -Walpole was at the height of his power. Pitt’s -first speech was on the occasion of the marriage -of the Prince of Wales in 1736; and, although -it consisted mainly of a series of high-sounding -compliments, it attracted immediate -and universal attention on account of its fine -command of language and its general elegance -of manner. United with these characteristics -was also a vein of irony that made it “gall<span class="pagenum" id="Page_87">87</span> -and wormwood” to the King and to Walpole. -The Prince of Wales, as so often has happened -in English history, was at the head of the opposition -to the government. This opposition -had been so strenuous as to provoke the energetic -displeasure of the King and of the First -Minister. King George’s animosity had gone -so far as to forbid the moving of the congratulatory -address by the Minister of the Crown. -This fact gave to Pitt an opportunity which he -turned to immediate account. Though there -was not a syllable in the speech that could be -regarded as disrespectful or improper, the orator -so managed the subject as to give to his compliments -all the effect of the keenest irony. -His glowing utterances on the “filial virtues” -of the son, and the “tender paternal delight” of -the father, showed to his astonished auditors that -he was concealing under the cover of faultless -phrases an able and a dangerous opposition. -Walpole was filled with anxiety and alarm. He is -said to have remarked: “We must at all events -muzzle that terrible cornet of horse.” It is<span class="pagenum" id="Page_88">88</span> -probable that the arts of bribery were attempted -in order to win over the young officer; -but it is certain that, if the effort was made, it -met with failure, for Pitt remained inflexibly -attached to the Prince and the opposition. -Walpole could at least throw him into disgrace. -Within two weeks after his speech, Pitt was deprived -of his commission.</p> - -<p>The effect was what an acute politician -should have foreseen. It made the Court more -odious; it created a general sympathy for the -young orator; it put him at the head of -the new party known as the Patriots. Walpole, -from this moment, was obliged to assume the -defensive, and his power steadily declined till -his fall in 1741. It was in a succession of -assaults upon Walpole that the great abilities -of Pitt forced themselves into universal recognition.</p> - -<p>The sources of his power were two-fold. In -the first place he made himself the avowed -champion of what may be called the popular -part of the Constitution. His effort was to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_89">89</span> -rescue the government from those corruptions -which had kept Walpole so long in place, and -had so long stifled all the popular sentiments -of the nation. In the interests of this purpose -he was the first to propose a reform of the House -of Commons, as a result of which there might be -something like a true representation of popular -interests. The other source of his power was -in the methods and characteristics of his eloquence. -He was not in a true sense a great -debator. His ability lay not in any power to -analyze a difficult and complicated subject and -present the bearings of its several parts in a manner -to convince the reason. His peculiarities -were rather in his way of seizing upon the more -obvious phases of the question at issue, and -presenting them with a nobility of sentiment, a -fervor of energy, a loftiness of conception, and -a power of invective that bore down and destroyed -all opposition.</p> - -<p>During much of the time between 1735 and -1755 Pitt was in the opposition. When, on -the fall of Walpole in 1741, Carteret came into<span class="pagenum" id="Page_90">90</span> -power, Pitt assailed his narrow views and sordid -methods with such energy that after three -years he was given up as an object of merited -reprobation. Pelham was now called to the -head of affairs; but he would accept the office -of First Minister only on condition that Pitt -would take office under him. The King for a -long time resisted; but, after a vain attempt to -have a government formed under Pulteney, he -gave his assent. Thus Pitt became Paymaster -of the Forces in 1746, an office which he held -till the death of Pelham in 1754.</p> - -<p>But on the accession of Pelham’s brother, -the Duke of Newcastle, he once more fell into -the opposition. The two years that followed -were the most brilliant period of his oratory. -The ministry gave him ample opportunities, -and he took every occasion to improve them. -Disasters abounded in every quarter of the -British Empire. The loss of Minorca, the capture -of Calcutta, the defeat of Gen. Braddock, -the threatened invasion of England by the -French, were themes well calculated to call<span class="pagenum" id="Page_91">91</span> -forth his awful invective. The result was that -Newcastle was driven from his place. Public -opinion demanded that the reins now be placed -in the hands of the only man fitted to hold -them. Pitt became Prime Minister in December -of 1756.</p> - -<p>But the personal dislike of the King still -would allow him no success. Newcastle with -the support of the royal favor was able to defeat -him in the House of Commons; and in -April, 1757, he was ordered to retire. But the -outburst of popular indignation showed itself in -all parts of the kingdom. The chief towns sent -gold boxes containing the “freedom of the -cities” in token of their approval of the minister. -As Horace Walpole said: “It rained -gold boxes.” The King was obliged to give -way, and in June of 1757 Pitt was recalled.</p> - -<p>Then began his great career as a statesman. -With a power that in England has never been -equalled, he infused his own spirit into all -those about him. The panic which had paralyzed -all effort gave way to an air of proud<span class="pagenum" id="Page_92">92</span> -and defiant confidence. The secret was, that -Pitt had the faculty of transfusing his own -zeal into all those with whom he came in -contact. “It will be impossible to have so -many ships prepared so soon,” said Lord Anson, -when a certain expedition was ordered. “If -the ships are not ready,” cried out Pitt, “I will -impeach your Lordship, in the presence of the -House.” The ships were ready; indeed, so -was every thing else as he required. And this -was the spirit that carried into England the energy -of a new existence. Within little more -than two years all was changed. In Africa -France was obliged to give up every settlement -she possessed. In India she was stripped of -every post, and, after defeat at sea, was obliged -to abandon her contest for the mastery of the -East. In the New World the victories of the -English were even more striking and more important. -A chain of French forts had hemmed -in the English settlers, and threatened the very -existence of the Colonies. One after another, -Fort Duquesne, Ticonderoga, Crown Point,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_93">93</span> -Oswego, Niagara, Louisburg, and Quebec, fell -into the hands of the English. The war is -summarized by saying that at the close of the -conflict, not a foot of territory was left to the -French in the Western World. In Europe the -French were defeated at Créveldt and Minden; -Havre was bombarded; the fortifications at -Cherbourg were destroyed; and the great victory -off Quiberon demolished the French Navy -for the remainder of the war. And yet, when in -1760 George III. ascended the throne, he conspired -with the Tory leaders to overthrow the -great minister, “in order,” as was finely said by -Grattan, “to be relieved of his superiority.” -George was determined to follow his mother’s injunctions -and “be king.” The royal opposition -succeeded in defeating Pitt on the manner of -beginning the Spanish war; and the most glorious -ministry that England had ever seen was -brought to an end in October, 1761. In four -and a half years England had been taken from -a state of extreme humiliation and made the first -power in Europe.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_94">94</span> -The remaining sixteen years of Pitt’s life -with one brief interval, were devoted to the -Opposition. He was tortured with the gout, -and during much of this period was unable to be -in his place in Parliament, or even to leave his -bed. But at times the energy of his will overcame -the infirmities of his body and he appeared -in the House, where he always made his -voice and his influence felt. With the accession -of the Tories under the lead of the King, the -traditional methods of government were in danger. -It was to combat these tendencies,—as -he said: “to restore, to save, to confirm the -Constitution,”—that all his powers of body -and mind were directed. He was the champion -of popular interests in opposition to the -usurping prerogatives of George III.</p> - -<p>It was during this period that most of his -speeches preserved to us in one form and another -were delivered. But the reporting of -speeches had not yet come into vogue. Most -of his efforts were written out with more or -less fulness by some of his friends. The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_95">95</span> -speech which every school boy learns, beginning: -“The atrocious crime of being a young -man,” was written out by Dr. Johnson. The -speech on the Stamp Act, delivered in January -of 1766, was reported by Sir Robert Dean and -Lord Charlemont. The one selected for this -collection, that on an Address to the Throne -concerning affairs in America, was reported by -Hugh Boyd, and is said to have been corrected -by Chatham himself. It is probable that no -speeches ever lost more in the process of reporting -than his; for, more than any one else -he was dependent on the circumstances and -the inspiration of the moment. An eminent -contemporary said of him: “No man ever -knew so little what he was going to say”; and -he once said of himself: “When once I am up, -every thing that is in my mind comes out.” -His speeches were in the matter of form -strictly extemporaneous, and they acquired -their almost marvellous power, very largely -from those peculiarities of voice and manner -which are wholly absent in the printed form.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_96">96</span> -Macaulay in one of his essays says of him: -“His figure was strikingly graceful and commanding, -his features high, his eye full of fire. -His voice, even when it sunk to a whisper, was -heard to the remotest benches; and when he -strained it to its fullest extent, the sound rose -like the swell of an organ of a great cathedral, -shook the house with its peal, and was heard -through lobbies and down staircases to the -Court of Requests and the precincts of Westminster -Hall. He cultivated all these eminent -advantages with the most assiduous care. His -action is described by a very malignant observer -as equal to that of Garrick. His play -of countenance was wonderful; he frequently -disconcerted a hostile orator by a single glance -of indignation or scorn.” To understand the -full power of his oratory, the reader must keep -these characteristics always in mind.</p> - -<p>From the beginning of the reign of George -III., Chatham, of course, was almost constantly -in the opposition. Afflicted by disease and -saddened by disappointment, he was seldom in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_97">97</span> -Parliament; and sometimes even when there, -he was too weak to give adequate expression to -his ardent thoughts. He was “the great Commoner”; -and his influence therefore was much -weakened when in 1767 he went into the House -of Lords. But to the last his character was -above suspicion, and it was finely said of him -that “great as was his oratory, every one felt -that the man was infinitely greater than the -orator.” Even Franklin said of him: “I have -sometimes seen eloquence without wisdom, and -often wisdom without eloquence; but in him I -have seen them united in the highest degree.” -His death occurred on the 11th of May, 1778, -in the seventieth year of his age.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_98">98</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="LORD_CHATHAM2">LORD CHATHAM.<br /> - -<span class="subhead">ON THE RIGHT OF TAXING AMERICA.<br /> -HOUSE OF COMMONS,<br />JANUARY 14, 1766.</span></h2> -</div> - -<blockquote class="end"> - -<p>The famous Stamp Act resorted to as a means of raising a -revenue from the American Colonies during the Ministry of -Mr. George Grenville, was approved on the 22d of March, 1765. -The law was never successfully enforced; and when, a few -months after its passage, the Ministry of Grenville was succeeded -by that of Lord Rockingham, it became evident that -nothing but a change of policy would restore America to -tranquillity. The plan of the Ministry was to repeal the act, -but at the same time to assert the <em>right</em> of Parliament to tax -the Colonies. Against this position, Pitt (for he had not yet -become Lord Chatham) determined to take a stand. The following -speech, made on the occasion, is a good specimen of -his earlier oratory,—though in parts it was evidently much -abridged in the process of reproduction. It was reported by -Sir Robert Dean, assisted by Lord Charlemont, and the version -here given is supposed to be more nearly as the speech -was spoken than is the report of any of the other of his -speeches, except that on an “Address to the Throne,” given -hereafter.</p></blockquote> - -<p class="sal"><span class="smcap">Mr. Speaker</span>:</p> - -<p>I came to town but to-day. I was a stranger -to the tenor of his Majesty’s speech, and the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_99">99</span> -proposed address, till I heard them read in this -House. Unconnected and unconsulted, I have -not the means of information. I am fearful of -offending through mistake, and therefore beg to -be indulged with a second reading of the proposed -address. [The address being read, Mr. Pitt -went on:] I commend the King’s speech, and -approve of the address in answer, as it decides -nothing, every gentleman being left at perfect -liberty to take such a part concerning America -as he may afterward see fit. One word only I -cannot approve of: an “early,” is a word that -does not belong to the notice the ministry have -given to Parliament of the troubles in America. -In a matter of such importance, the communication -ought to have been <em>immediate</em>!</p> - -<p>I speak not now with respect to parties. I -stand up in this place single and independent. -As to the late ministry [turning himself to Mr. -Grenville, who sat within one of him], every -capital measure they have taken has been entirely -wrong! As to the present gentlemen, to -those at least whom I have in my eye [looking -at the bench where General Conway sat with -the lords of the treasury], I have no objection. -I have never been made a sacrifice by any of -them. Their characters are fair; and I am always<span class="pagenum" id="Page_100">100</span> -glad when men of fair character engage -in his Majesty’s service. Some of them did -me the honor to ask my opinion before they -would engage. These will now do me the justice -to own, I advised them to do it—but, notwithstanding -[for I love to be explicit], <em>I cannot -give them my confidence</em>. Pardon me, gentlemen -[bowing to the ministry], confidence is a -plant of slow growth in an aged bosom. Youth -is the season of credulity. By comparing -events with each other, reasoning from effects -to causes, methinks I plainly discover the -traces of an <em>overruling</em> influence.<a id="FNanchor_27" href="#Footnote_27" class="fnanchor">27</a></p> - -<p>There is a clause in the Act of Settlement -obliging every minister to sign his name to the -advice which he gives to his sovereign. Would -it were observed! I have had the honor to -serve the Crown, and if I could have submitted -to <em>influence</em>, I might have still continued to -serve: but I would not be responsible for others. -I have no local attachments. It is indifferent -to me whether a man was rocked in his -cradle on this side or that side of the Tweed. -I sought for merit wherever it was to be found. -It is my boast, that I was the first minister -who looked for it, and found it, in the mountains -of the North. I called it forth, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_101">101</span> -drew into your service a hardy and intrepid -race of men—men, who, when left by your -jealousy, became a prey to the artifices of your -enemies, and had gone nigh to have overturned -the state in the war before the last. These -men, in the last war, were brought to combat -on your side. They served with fidelity, as -they fought with valor, and conquered for you -in every part of the world. Detested be the -national reflections against them! They are -unjust, groundless, illiberal, unmanly! When -I ceased to serve his Majesty as a minister, it -was not the <em>country</em> of the man by which I was -moved—but the <em>man</em> of that country wanted -wisdom, and held principles incompatible with -freedom.</p> - -<p>It is a long time, Mr. Speaker, since I have -attended in Parliament. When the resolution -was taken in this House to tax America, I was -ill in bed. If I could have endured to be carried -in my bed—so great was the agitation of -my mind for the consequences—I would have -solicited some kind hand to have laid me down -on this floor, to have borne my testimony against -it! It is now an act that has passed. I would -speak with decency of every act of this House; -but I must beg the indulgence of the House to -speak of it with freedom.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_102">102</span> -I hope a day may soon be appointed to consider -the state of the nation with respect to -America. I hope gentlemen will come to this -debate with all the temper and impartiality that -his Majesty recommends, and the importance -of the subject requires; a subject of greater -importance than ever engaged the attention of -this House, that subject only excepted, when, -near a century ago, it was the question whether -you yourselves were to be bond or free. In -the meantime, as I cannot depend upon my -health for any future day (such is the nature of -my infirmities), I will beg to say a few words at -present, leaving the justice, the equity, the -policy, the expediency of the act to another -time.</p> - -<p>I will only speak to one point—a point which -seems not to have been generally understood -I mean to the <em>right</em>. Some gentlemen [alluding -to Mr. Nugent] seem to have considered it -as a point of honor. If gentlemen consider it -in that light, they leave all measures of right -and wrong, to follow a delusion that may lead -to destruction. It is my opinion, that this kingdom -has no right to lay a tax upon the colonies. -At the same time, I assert the authority of this -kingdom over the colonies to be sovereign and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_103">103</span> -supreme, in every circumstance of government -and legislation whatsoever. They are the subjects -of this kingdom; equally entitled with -yourselves to all the natural rights of mankind -and the peculiar privileges of Englishmen; -equally bound by its laws, and equally participating -in the constitution of this free country. -The Americans are the sons, not the bastards -of England! Taxation is no part of the governing -or legislative power. The taxes are a -voluntary <em>gift</em> and <em>grant</em> of the Commons alone. -In legislation the three estates of the realm are -alike concerned; but the concurrence of the -peers and the Crown to a tax is only necessary -to clothe it with the form of a law. The gift -and grant is of the Commons alone. In ancient -days, the Crown, the barons, and the clergy -possessed the lands. In those days, the barons -and the clergy gave and granted to the Crown. -They gave and granted what was their own! -At present, since the discovery of America, and -other circumstances permitting, the Commons -are become the proprietors of the land. The -Church (God bless it!) has but a pittance. The -property of the lords, compared with that of -the commons, is as a drop of water in the -ocean; and this House represents those commons,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_104">104</span> -the proprietors of the lands; and those -proprietors virtually represent the rest of the -inhabitants. When, therefore, in this House, -we give and grant, we give and grant what -is our own. But in an American tax, what -do we do? “We, your Majesty’s Commons -for Great Britain, give and grant to your -Majesty”—what? Our own property! No! -“We give and grant to your Majesty” the -property of your Majesty’s Commons of America! -It is an absurdity in terms.<a id="FNanchor_28" href="#Footnote_28" class="fnanchor">28</a></p> - -<p>The distinction between legislation and taxation -is essentially necessary to liberty. The -Crown and the peers are equally legislative -powers with the Commons. If taxation be a -part of simple legislation, the Crown and the -peers have rights in taxation as well as yourselves; -rights which they will claim, which they -will exercise, whenever the principle can be supported -by power.</p> - -<p>There is an idea in some that the colonies are -<em>virtually</em> represented in the House. I would -fain know by whom an American is represented -here. Is he represented by any knight of -the shire, in any county in this kingdom? -Would to God that respectable representation -was augmented to a greater number! Or will<span class="pagenum" id="Page_105">105</span> -you tell him that he is represented by any representative -of a borough? a borough which, perhaps, -its own representatives never saw! This -is what is called the rotten part of the Constitution. -It cannot continue a century. If it does -not drop, it must be amputated.<a id="FNanchor_29" href="#Footnote_29" class="fnanchor">29</a> The idea of -a virtual representation of America in this -House is the most contemptible idea that ever -entered into the head of a man. It does not -deserve a serious refutation.</p> - -<p>The Commons of America represented in -their several assemblies, have ever been in possession -of the exercise of this, their constitutional -right, of giving and granting their own -money. They would have been slaves if they -had not enjoyed it! At the same time, this -kingdom, as the supreme governing and legislative -power, has always bound the colonies by -her laws, by her regulations, and restrictions in -trade, in navigation, in manufactures, in every -thing, except that of taking their money out of -their pockets without their consent.</p> - -<p>Here I would draw the line:</p> - -<p class="p1 b1 center"> -Quam ultra citraque neque consistere rectum. -</p> - -<p>[When Lord Chatham had concluded, Mr. -George Grenville secured the floor and entered<span class="pagenum" id="Page_106">106</span> -into a general denunciation of the tumults and -riots which had taken place in the colonies, and -declared that they bordered on rebellion. He -condemned the language and sentiments which -he had heard as encouraging a <em>revolution</em>. A -portion of his speech is here inserted, as it is -necessary for a complete understanding of the -reply of Lord Chatham.]</p> - -<p>“I cannot,” said Mr. Grenville, “understand -the difference between external and internal -taxes. They are the same in effect, and differ only -in name. That this kingdom has the sovereign, -the supreme legislative power over America, is -granted; it cannot be denied; and taxation is a -part of that sovereign power. It is one branch -of the legislation. It is, it has been, exercised -over those who are not, who were never represented. -It is exercised over the India Company, -the merchants of London, the proprietors of the -stocks, and over many great manufacturing -towns. It was exercised over the county palatine -of Chester, and the bishopric of Durham, -before they sent any representatives to Parliament. -I appeal for proof to the preambles of -the acts which gave them representatives; one -in the reign of Henry VIII., the other in that of -Charles II.” [Mr. Grenville then quoted the acts,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_107">107</span> -and desired that they might be read; which being -done, he said]: “When I proposed to tax -America, I asked the House if any gentleman -would object to the right; I repeatedly asked it, -and no man would attempt to deny it. Protection -and obedience are reciprocal. Great Britain -protects America; America is bound to yield -obedience. If not, tell me when the Americans -were emancipated? When they want the protection -of this kingdom, they are always very -ready to ask it. That protection has always -been afforded them in the most full and ample -manner. The nation has run herself into an -immense debt to give them their protection; -and now, when they are called upon to contribute -a small share toward the public expense—an -expense arising from themselves—they -renounce your authority, insult your officers, -and break out, I might almost say, into open -rebellion. The seditious spirit of the colonies -owes its birth to the factions in this House. -Gentlemen are careless of the consequences of -what they say, provided it answers the purposes -of opposition. We were told we trod on tender -ground. We were bid to expect disobedience. -What is this but telling the Americans -to stand out against the law, to encourage their<span class="pagenum" id="Page_108">108</span> -obstinacy with the expectation of support from -hence? “Let us only hold out a little,” they -would say, “our friends will soon be in power.” -Ungrateful people of America! Bounties have -been extended to them. When I had the honor -of serving the Crown, while you yourselves -were loaded with an enormous debt, you gave -bounties on their lumber, on their iron, their -hemp, and many other articles. You have relaxed -in their favor the Act of Navigation, that -palladium of the British commerce; and yet I -have been abused in all the public papers as an -enemy to the trade of America. I have been -particularly charged with giving orders and instructions -to prevent the Spanish trade, and -thereby stopping the channel by which alone -North America used to be supplied with cash -for remittances to this country. I defy any -man to produce any such orders or instructions. -I discouraged no trade but what was illicit, -what was prohibited by an act of Parliament. -I desire a West India merchant [Mr. Long], -well known in the city, a gentleman of character, -may be examined. He will tell you that I -offered to do every thing in my power to advance -the trade of America. I was above giving -an answer to anonymous calumnies; but in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_109">109</span> -this place it becomes one to wipe off the aspersion.”</p> - -<p>[Here Mr. Grenville ceased. Several members -got up to speak, but Mr. Pitt seeming to -rise, the House was so clamorous for Mr. <em>Pitt!</em> -Mr. <em>Pitt!</em> that the speaker was obliged to call -to order.]</p> - -<p>Mr. Pitt said, I do not apprehend I am speaking -twice. I did expressly reserve a part of my -subject, in order to save the time of this House; -but I am compelled to proceed in it. I do -not speak twice; I only finish what I designedly -left imperfect. But if the House is of a -different opinion, far be it from me to indulge -a wish of transgression against order. I am -content, if it be your pleasure, to be silent. -[Here he paused. The House resounding with -<em>Go on! go on!</em> he proceeded:]</p> - -<p>Gentlemen, sir, have been charged with giving -birth to <em>sedition</em> in America. They have -spoken their sentiments with freedom against -this unhappy act, and that freedom has become -their crime. Sorry I am to hear the liberty of -speech in this House imputed as a crime. But -the imputation shall not discourage me. It is -a liberty I mean to exercise. No gentleman -ought to be afraid to exercise it. It is a liberty<span class="pagenum" id="Page_110">110</span> -by which the gentleman who calumniates it -might have profited. He ought to have desisted -from his project. The gentleman tells -us, America is obstinate; America is almost in -open rebellion. I rejoice that America has resisted. -Three millions of people, so dead to -all the feelings of liberty as voluntarily to submit -to be slaves, would have been fit instruments -to make slaves of the rest. I come not -here armed at all points, with law cases and -acts of Parliament, with the statute book -doubled down in dog’s ears, to defend the -cause of liberty. If I had, I myself would have -cited the two cases of Chester and Durham. I -would have cited them to show that, even -under former arbitrary reigns, Parliaments were -ashamed of taxing a people without their consent, -and allowed them representatives. Why -did the gentleman confine himself to Chester -and Durham?<a id="FNanchor_30" href="#Footnote_30" class="fnanchor">30</a> He might have taken a higher -example in Wales—Wales, that never was -taxed by Parliament till it was incorporated. -I would not debate a particular point of law -with the gentleman. I know his abilities. I -have been obliged to his diligent researches. -But, for the defence of liberty, upon a general -principle, upon a constitutional principle, it is a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_111">111</span> -ground on which I stand firm—on which I dare -meet any man. The gentleman tells us of many -who are taxed, and are not represented—the -India company, merchants, stockholders, manufacturers. -Surely many of these are represented -in other capacities, as owners of land, or -as freemen of boroughs. It is a misfortune -that more are not equally represented. But -they are all inhabitants, and as such, are they -not virtually represented? Many have it in -their option to be actually represented. They -have connections with those that elect, and -they have influence over them. The gentleman -mentioned the stockholders. I hope he does -not reckon the debts of the nation as a part of -the national estate.</p> - -<p>Since the accession of King William, many -ministers, some of great, others of more moderate -abilities, have taken the lead of government. -[Here Mr. Pitt went through the list of them, -bringing it down till he came to himself, giving -a short sketch of the characters of each, and -then proceeded:] None of these thought, or even -dreamed, of robbing the colonies of their constitutional -rights. That was reserved to mark -the era of the late administration. Not that -there were wanting some, when I had the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_112">112</span> -honor to serve his Majesty, to propose to me -to burn my fingers with an American stamp -act. With the enemy at their back, with our -bayonets at their breasts, in the day of their -distress, perhaps the Americans would have -submitted to the imposition; but it would have -been taking an ungenerous, an unjust advantage. -The gentleman boasts of his bounties to -America! Are not these bounties intended -finally for the benefit of this kingdom? If -they are not, he has misapplied the national -treasures!</p> - -<p>I am no courtier of America. I stand up for -this kingdom. I maintain that the Parliament -has a right to bind, to restrain America. Our -legislative power over the colonies is sovereign -and supreme. When it ceases to be sovereign -and supreme, I would advise every gentleman -to sell his lands, if he can, and embark for that -country. When two countries are connected -together like England and her colonies, without -being incorporated, the one must necessarily -govern. The greater must rule the less. -But she must so rule it as <em>not to contradict the -fundamental principles that are common to -both</em>.</p> - -<p>If the gentleman does not understand the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_113">113</span> -difference between external and internal taxes, -I cannot help it. There is a plain distinction -between taxes levied for the purposes of raising -a revenue, and duties imposed for the regulation -of trade, for the accommodation of the -subject; although, in the consequences, some -revenue may incidentally arise from the -latter.</p> - -<p>The gentleman asks, When were the colonies -emancipated? I desire to know, when were -they made slaves? But I dwell not upon -words. When I had the honor of serving his -Majesty, I availed myself of the means of information -which I derived from my office. I -speak, therefore, from knowledge. My materials -were good. I was at pains to collect, to -digest, to consider them; and I will be bold to -affirm, that the profits to Great Britain from the -trade of the colonies, through all its branches, -is two millions a year. This is the fund that -carried you triumphantly through the last war. -The estates that were rented at two thousand -pounds a year, threescore years ago, are at -three thousand at present. Those estates sold -then from fifteen to eighteen years purchase; -the same may now be sold for thirty. You -owe this to America. This is the price America<span class="pagenum" id="Page_114">114</span> -pays you for her protection. And shall a miserable -financier come with a boast, that he can -bring “a pepper-corn” into the exchequer by -the loss of millions to the nation?<a id="FNanchor_31" href="#Footnote_31" class="fnanchor">31</a> I dare -not say how much higher these profits may -be augmented. Omitting [<i>i. e.</i>, not taking into -account] the immense increase of people, by -natural population, in the northern colonies, -and the emigration from every part of Europe, -I am convinced on other grounds that the -commercial system of America may be altered -to advantage. You have prohibited where you -ought to have encouraged. You have encouraged -where you ought to have prohibited. Improper -restraints have been laid on the continent -in favor of the islands. You have but two -nations to trade with in America. Would you -had twenty! Let acts of Parliament in consequence -of treaties remain; but let not an English -minister become a custom-house officer for -Spain, or for any foreign power. Much is -wrong! Much may be amended for the general -good of the whole!</p> - -<p>Does the gentleman complain he has been -misrepresented in the public prints? It is a -common misfortune. In the Spanish affair of -the last war, I was abused in all the newspapers<span class="pagenum" id="Page_115">115</span> -for having advised his Majesty to violate the laws -of nations with regard to Spain. The abuse was -industriously circulated even in hand-bills. If -administration did not propagate the abuse, administration -never contradicted it. I will not -say what advice I did give the King. My advice -is in writing, signed by myself, in the possession -of the Crown. But I will say what advice -I did not give to the King. I did <em>not</em> -advise him to violate any of the laws of -nations.</p> - -<p>As to the report of the gentleman’s preventing -in some way the trade for bullion with the -Spaniards, it was spoken of so confidently that I -own I am one of those who did believe it to be -true.</p> - -<p>The gentleman must not wonder he was not -contradicted when, as minister, he asserted the -right of Parliament to tax America. I know -not how it is, but there is a modesty in this -House which does not choose to contradict a -minister. Even your chair, sir, looks too often -toward St. James’. I wish gentlemen would -get the better of this modesty. If they do not, -perhaps the collective body may begin to abate -of its respect for the representative. Lord Bacon -has told me, that a great question would not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_116">116</span> -fail of being agitated at one time or another. I -was willing to agitate such a question at the -proper season, viz., that of the German war—<em>my</em> -German war, they called it! Every session -I called out, Has any body any objection to the -German war? Nobody would object to it, one -gentleman only excepted, since removed to the -Upper House by succession to an ancient barony -[Lord Le Despencer, formerly Sir Francis -Dashwood]. He told me he did not like a German -war. I honored the man for it, and was -sorry when he was turned out of his post.</p> - -<p>A great deal has been said without doors of -the power, of the strength of America. It is a -topic that ought to be cautiously meddled with. -In a good cause, on a sound bottom, the force -of this country can crush America to atoms. I -know the valor of your troops. I know the skill -of your officers. There is not a company of foot -that has served in America, out of which you -may not pick a man of sufficient knowledge and -experience to make a governor of a colony there. -But on this ground, on the Stamp Act, which so -many here will think a crying injustice, I am -one who will lift up my hands against it.</p> - -<p>In such a cause, your success would be hazardous. -America, if she fell, would fall like the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_117">117</span> -strong man; she would embrace the pillars of -the State, and pull down the Constitution along -with her. Is this your boasted peace—not to -sheathe the sword in its scabbard, but to sheathe -it in the bowels of your countrymen? Will you -quarrel with yourselves, now the whole house of -Bourbon is united against you; while France -disturbs your fisheries in Newfoundland, embarrasses -your slave trade to Africa, and withholds -from your subjects in Canada their property -stipulated by treaty; while the ransom for the -Manillas is denied by Spain, and its gallant conqueror -basely traduced into a mean plunderer; -a gentleman [Colonel Draper] whose noble and -generous spirit would do honor to the proudest -grandee of the country? The Americans have -not acted in all things with prudence and temper: -they have been wronged: they have been -driven to madness by injustice. Will you punish -them for the madness you have occasioned? -Rather let prudence and temper come first -from this side. I will undertake for America -that she will follow the example. There are -two lines in a ballad of Prior’s, of a man’s -behavior to his wife, so applicable to you and -your colonies, that I can not help repeating -them:</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_118">118</span></p> - -<div class="poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="iq">“Be to her faults a little blind;<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Be to her virtues very kind.”<br /></span> -</div></div> -</div> - -<p>Upon the whole, I will beg leave to tell the -House what is my opinion. It is, that the -Stamp Act be repealed absolutely, totally, and -immediately. That the reason for the repeal -be assigned, viz., because it was founded on an -erroneous principle. At the same time, let the -sovereign authority of this country over the -colonies be asserted in as strong terms as can -be devised, and be made to extend to every -point of legislation whatsoever; that we may -bind their trade, confine their manufactures, and -exercise every power whatsoever, except that -of taking their money out of their pockets without -their consent.</p> - -<blockquote class="end"> - -<p>Notwithstanding the advice of Pitt, the government pushed -on in its mad course. The Stamp Act had to be repealed; -but accompanying the repeal was a declaration that Parliament -had the power and the right “to bind the colonies and people -of America in all cases whatsoever.” This was the very position -that the Colonies had denied. It was not so much the -<em>tax</em> as the <em>right</em> to tax that the Americans questioned. When -the resolution reached the House of Peers, Lord Camden sustained -the American view. He said: “My position is this,—I -repeat it—I will maintain to the last hour, taxation and representation -are inseparable. This position is founded on the -law of nature. It is more, it is in itself an eternal law of -nature. For whatever is a man’s own is absolutely his own.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_119">119</span> -No man has a right to take it from him without his consent -either expressed by himself or his representative. Whoever -attempts to do this attempts an injury. Whoever does it, -commits a robbery.” Lord Mansfield, however, as we shall -see, took the opposite ground, and the opposite ground prevailed. -The consequence was that the Colonies were lost.</p></blockquote> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_120">120</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="LORD_CHATHAM3">LORD CHATHAM.<br /> - -<span class="subhead">ON AN ADDRESS TO THE THRONE CONCERNING -AFFAIRS IN AMERICA.<br />HOUSE OF LORDS, -NOVEMBER 18, 1777.</span></h2> -</div> - -<blockquote class="end"> - -<p>Though at the delivery of this speech Chatham had already -entered upon his seventieth year, he seems to have been inspired -with all the fire of his youth. It is by most critics regarded as -his greatest effort. Chatham had abundant reason for an extraordinary -affection for America, and, as he saw that a persistence -in the mad course entered upon would inevitably -result in a loss of the colonies, he brought all his powers to an -advocacy of a treaty of peace on such terms as would at once -save the colonies and the honor of the mother country. It is -the only speech of Chatham, the report of which was corrected -by himself and published with his approval.</p></blockquote> - -<p>I rise, my Lords, to declare my sentiments -on this most solemn and serious subject. It -has imposed a load upon my mind, which, I -fear, nothing can remove, but which impels me -to endeavor its alleviation, by a free and unreserved -communication of my sentiments.</p> - -<p>In the first part of the address, I have the -honor of heartily concurring with the noble<span class="pagenum" id="Page_121">121</span> -Earl who moved it. No man feels sincerer joy -than I do; none can offer more genuine congratulations -on every accession of strength to -the Protestant succession. I therefore join in -every congratulation on the birth of another -princess, and the happy recovery of her -Majesty.</p> - -<p>But I must stop here. My courtly complaisance -will carry me no farther. I will not join -in congratulation on misfortune and disgrace. -I cannot concur in a blind and servile address, -which approves and endeavors to sanctify the -monstrous measures which have heaped disgrace -and misfortune upon us. This, my Lords, -is a perilous and tremendous moment! It is -not a time for adulation. The smoothness of -flattery cannot now avail—cannot save us in -this rugged and awful crisis. It is now necessary -to instruct the Throne in the language of -truth. We must dispel the illusion and the -darkness which envelop it, and display, in its -full danger and true colors, the ruin that is -brought to our doors.</p> - -<p>This, my Lords, is our duty. It is the -proper function of this noble assembly, sitting, -as we do, upon our honors in this House, the -hereditary council of the Crown. <em>Who</em> is the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_122">122</span> -minister—<em>where</em> is the minister, that has dared -to suggest to the Throne the contrary, unconstitutional -language this day delivered from it? -The accustomed language from the Throne has -been application to Parliament for advice, and -a reliance on its constitutional advice and assistance. -As it is the right of Parliament to -give, so it is the duty of the Crown to ask it. -But on this day, and in this extreme momentous -exigency, no reliance is reposed on our -constitutional counsels! no advice is asked -from the sober and enlightened care of Parliament! -but the Crown, from itself and by itself, -declares an unalterable determination to pursue -measures—and what measures, my Lords? -The measures that have produced the imminent -perils that threaten us; the measures that -have brought ruin to our doors.</p> - -<p>Can the minister of the day now presume to -expect a continuance of support in this ruinous -infatuation? Can Parliament be so dead to its -dignity and its duty as to be thus deluded into -the loss of the one and the violation of the -other? To give an unlimited credit and support -for the steady perseverance in measures -not proposed for our parliamentary advice, but -dictated and forced upon us—in measures, I<span class="pagenum" id="Page_123">123</span> -say, my Lords, which have reduced this late -flourishing empire to ruin and contempt! -“But yesterday, and England might have -stood against the world: now none so poor to -do her reverence.” I use the words of a poet; -but, though it be poetry, it is no fiction. It is -a shameful truth, that not only the power and -strength of this country are wasting away and -expiring, but her well-earned glories, her true -honor, and substantial dignity are sacrificed.</p> - -<p>France, my Lords, has insulted you; she -has encouraged and sustained America; and, -whether America be wrong or right, the dignity -of this country ought to spurn at the officious -insult of French interference. The ministers -and embassadors of those who are called rebels -and enemies are in Paris; in Paris they transact -the reciprocal interests of America and France. -Can there be a more mortifying insult? Can -even our ministers sustain a more humiliating -disgrace? Do they dare to resent it? Do they -presume even to hint a vindication of their -honor, and the dignity of the State, by requiring -the dismission of the plenipotentiaries of -America? Such is the degradation to which -they have reduced the glories of England! -The people whom they affect to call contemptible<span class="pagenum" id="Page_124">124</span> -rebels, but whose growing power has -at last obtained the name of enemies; the people -with whom they have engaged this country -in war, and against whom they now command -our implicit support in every measure of desperate -hostility—this people, despised as rebels, -or acknowledged as enemies, are abetted against -you, supplied with every military store, their -interests consulted, and their embassadors entertained, -by your inveterate enemy! and our -ministers dare not interpose with dignity or -effect. Is this the honor of a great kingdom? -Is this the indignant spirit of England, who -“but yesterday” gave law to the house of -Bourbon? My Lords, the dignity of nations -demands a decisive conduct in a situation like -this. Even when the greatest prince that perhaps -this country ever saw filled our Throne, -the requisition of a Spanish general, on a similar -subject, was attended to and complied with; -for, on the spirited remonstrance of the Duke -of Alva, Elizabeth found herself obliged to -deny the Flemish exiles all countenance, support, -or even entrance into her dominions; and -the Count Le Marque, with his few desperate -followers, were expelled the kingdom. Happening -to arrive at the Brille, and finding it<span class="pagenum" id="Page_125">125</span> -weak in defence, they made themselves masters -of the place; and this was the foundation of -the United Provinces.</p> - -<p>My Lords, this ruinous and ignominious situation, -where we can not act with success, nor -suffer with honor, calls upon us to remonstrate -in the strongest and loudest language of truth, -to rescue the ear of majesty from the delusions -which surround it. The desperate state of our -arms abroad is in part known. No man thinks -more highly of them than I do. I love and -honor the English troops. I know their virtues -and their valor. I know they can achieve any -thing except impossibilities; and I know that -the conquest of English America <em>is an impossibility</em>. -You cannot, I venture to say it, <em>you cannot</em> -conquer America. Your armies in the last -war effected every thing that could be effected; -and what was it? It cost a numerous army, -under the command of a most able general -[Lord Amherst], now a noble Lord in this -House, a long and laborious campaign, to expel -five thousand Frenchmen from French America. -My Lords, <em>you cannot conquer America</em>. What -is your present situation there? We do not -know the worst; but we know that in three -campaigns we have done nothing and suffered<span class="pagenum" id="Page_126">126</span> -much. Besides the sufferings, perhaps <em>total -loss</em> of the Northern force,<a id="FNanchor_32" href="#Footnote_32" class="fnanchor">32</a> the best appointed -army that ever took the field, commanded by -Sir William Howe, has retired from the American -lines. <em>He was obliged</em> to relinquish his attempt, -and with great delay and danger to -adopt a new and distant plan of operations. -We shall soon know, and in any event have -reason to lament, what may have happened -since. As to conquest, therefore, my Lords, I -repeat, it is impossible. You may swell every -expense and every effort still more extravagantly; -pile and accumulate every assistance -you can buy or borrow; traffic and barter with -every little pitiful German prince that sells and -sends his subjects to the shambles of a foreign -prince; your efforts are forever vain and impotent—doubly -so from this mercenary aid on -which you rely; for it irritates, to an incurable -resentment, the minds of your enemies, to -overrun them with the mercenary sons of rapine -and plunder, devoting them and their possessions -to the rapacity of hireling cruelty! If I -were an American, as I am an Englishman, -while a foreign troop was landed in my country, -I never would lay down my arms—never—never—never.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_127">127</span> -Your own army is infected with the contagion -of these illiberal allies. The spirit of plunder -and of rapine is gone forth among them. I -know it; and, notwithstanding what the noble -Earl [Lord Percy] who moved the address has -given as his opinion of the American army, I -know from authentic information, and the <em>most -experienced officers</em>, that our discipline is deeply -wounded. While this is notoriously our sinking -situation, America grows and flourishes; -while our strength and discipline are lowered, -hers are rising and improving.</p> - -<p>But, my Lords, who is the man that, in addition -to these disgraces and mischiefs of our -army, has dared to authorize and associate to -our arms the tomahawk and scalping-knife of -the savage? to call into civilized alliance the -wild and inhuman savage of the woods; to delegate -to the merciless Indian the defence of -disputed rights, and to wage the horrors of his -barbarous war against our brethren? My -Lords, these enormities cry aloud for redress -and punishment. Unless thoroughly done -away, it will be a stain on the national character. -It is a violation of the Constitution. I -believe it is against law. It is not the least of -our national misfortunes that the strength and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_128">128</span> -character of our army are thus impaired. Infected -with the mercenary spirit of robbery and -rapine; familiarized to the horrid scenes of -savage cruelty, it can no longer boast of the -noble and generous principles which dignify a -soldier; no longer sympathize with the dignity -of the royal banner, nor feel the pride, pomp, -and circumstance of glorious war, “that make -ambition virtue!” What makes ambition -virtue?—the sense of honor. But is the sense -of honor consistent with a spirit of plunder, or -the practice of murder? Can it flow from mercenary -motives, or can it prompt to cruel -deeds? Besides these murderers and plunderers, -let me ask our ministers, What other allies -have they acquired? What <em>other powers</em> have -they associated in their cause? Have they -entered into alliance with the <em>king of the gipsies</em>? -Nothing, my Lords, is too low or too -ludicrous to be consistent with their counsels.</p> - -<p>The independent views of America have been -stated and asserted as the foundation of this -address. My Lords, no man wishes for the due -dependence of America on this country more -than I do. To preserve it, and not confirm -that state of independence into which <em>your -measures</em> hitherto have <em>driven them</em>, is the object<span class="pagenum" id="Page_129">129</span> -which we ought to unite in attaining. The -Americans, contending for their rights against -arbitrary exactions, I love and admire. It is -the struggle of free and virtuous patriots. But, -contending for independency and total disconnection -from England, as an Englishman, I -cannot wish them success; for in a due constitutional -dependency, including the ancient supremacy -of this country in regulating their -commerce and navigation, consists the mutual -happiness and prosperity both of England and -America. She derived assistance and protection -from us; and we reaped from her the -most important advantages. She was, indeed, -the fountain of our wealth, the nerve of our -strength, the nursery and basis of our naval -power. It is our duty, therefore, my Lords, if -we wish to save our country, most seriously to -endeavor the recovery of these most beneficial -subjects; and in this perilous crisis, perhaps the -present moment may be the only one in which -we can hope for success. For in their negotiations -with France, they have, or think they -have, reason to complain; though it be notorious -that they have received from that -power important supplies and assistance of -various kinds, yet it is certain they expected it<span class="pagenum" id="Page_130">130</span> -in a more decisive and immediate degree. -America is in ill humor with France; on some -points they have not entirely answered her expectations. -Let us wisely take advantage of -every possible moment of reconciliation. Besides, -the natural disposition of America herself -still leans toward England; to the old habits -of connection and mutual interest that united -both countries. This <em>was</em> the established sentiment -of all the Continent; and still, my -Lords, in the great and principal part, the -sound part of America, this wise and affectionate -disposition prevails. And there is a very -considerable part of America yet sound—the -middle and the southern provinces. Some -parts may be factious and blind to their true -interests; but if we express a wise and benevolent -disposition to communicate with them -those immutable rights of nature and those -constitutional liberties to which they are equally -entitled with ourselves, by a conduct so just -and humane we shall confirm the favorable and -conciliate the adverse. I say, my Lords, the -rights and liberties to which they are equally -entitled with ourselves, <em>but no more</em>. I would -participate to them every enjoyment and freedom -which the colonizing subjects of a free<span class="pagenum" id="Page_131">131</span> -state can possess, or wish to possess; and I do -not see why they should not enjoy every fundamental -right in their property, and every -original substantial liberty, which Devonshire, -or Surrey, or the county I live in, or any other -county in England, can claim; reserving always, -as the sacred right of the mother country, the -due constitutional dependency of the colonies. -The inherent supremacy of the state in regulating -and protecting the navigation and commerce -of all her subjects, is necessary for the -mutual benefit and preservation of every part, -to constitute and preserve the prosperous arrangement -of the whole empire.</p> - -<p>The sound parts of America, of which I have -spoken, must be sensible of these great truths -and of their real interests. America is not in -that state of desperate and contemptible rebellion -which this country has been deluded to -believe. It is not a wild and lawless banditti, -who, having nothing to lose, might hope to -snatch something from public convulsions. -Many of their leaders and great men have a -great stake in this great contest. The gentleman -who conducts their armies, I am told, has -an estate of four or five thousand pounds a -year; and when I consider these things, I cannot<span class="pagenum" id="Page_132">132</span> -but lament the inconsiderate violence of -our penal acts, our declaration of treason and -rebellion, with all the fatal effects of attainder -and confiscation.</p> - -<p>As to the disposition of foreign powers which -is asserted [in the King’s speech] to be pacific -and friendly, let us judge, my Lords, rather by -their actions and the nature of things than by -interested assertions. The uniform assistance -supplied to America by France suggests a different -conclusion. The most important interests -of France in aggrandizing and enriching -herself with what she most wants, supplies of -every naval store from America, must inspire -her with different sentiments. The extraordinary -preparations of the House of Bourbon, -by land and by sea, from Dunkirk to the Straits, -equally ready and willing to overwhelm these -defenceless islands, should rouse us to a sense -of their real disposition and our own danger.<a id="FNanchor_33" href="#Footnote_33" class="fnanchor">33</a> -Not five thousand troops in England! hardly -three thousand in Ireland! What can we oppose -to the combined force of our enemies? -Scarcely twenty ships of the line so fully or -sufficiently manned, that any admiral’s reputation -would permit him to take the command of. -The river of Lisbon in the possession of our<span class="pagenum" id="Page_133">133</span> -enemies! The seas swept by American privateers! -Our Channel trade torn to pieces by -them! In this complicated crisis of danger, -weakness at home, and calamity abroad, terrified -and insulted by the neighboring powers, -unable to act in America, or acting only to be -destroyed, where is the man with the forehead -to promise or hope for success in such a situation, -or from perseverence in the measures that -have driven us to it? Who has the forehead -to do so? Where is that man? I should be -glad to see his face.</p> - -<p>You can not <em>conciliate</em> America by your present -measures. You cannot <em>subdue</em> her by your -present or by any measures. What, then, can -you do? You cannot conquer; you cannot -gain; but you can <em>address</em>; you can lull the -fears and anxieties of the moment into an ignorance -of the danger that should produce -them. But, my Lords, the time demands the -language of truth. We must not now apply -the flattering unction of servile compliance or -blind complaisance. In a just and necessary -war, to maintain the rights or honor of my -country, I would strip the shirt from my back to -support it. But in such a war as this, unjust -in its principle, impracticable in its means, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_134">134</span> -ruinous in its consequences, I would not contribute -a single effort nor a single shilling. I -do not call for vengeance on the heads of those -who have been guilty; I only recommend to -them to make their retreat. Let them walk off; -and let them make haste, or they may be assured -that speedy and condign punishment will -overtake them.</p> - -<p>My Lords, I have submitted to you, with -the freedom and truth which I think my duty, -my sentiments on your present awful situation. -I have laid before you the ruin of your power, -the disgrace of your reputation, the pollution -of your discipline, the contamination of your -morals, the complication of calamities, foreign -and domestic, that overwhelm your sinking -country. Your dearest interests, your own -liberties, the Constitution itself, totters to the -foundation. All this disgraceful danger, this -multitude of misery, is the monstrous offspring -of this unnatural war. We have been deceived -and deluded too long. Let us now stop short. -This is the crisis—the only crisis of time and -situation, to give us a possibility of escape from -the fatal effects of our delusions. But if, in an -obstinate and infatuated perseverance in folly, -we slavishly echo the peremptory words this<span class="pagenum" id="Page_135">135</span> -day presented to us, nothing can save this devoted -country from complete and final ruin. -We madly rush into multiplied miseries, and -“confusion worse confounded.”</p> - -<p>Is it possible, can it be believed, that ministers -are yet blind to this impending destruction? -I did hope, that instead of this false and empty -vanity, this overweening pride, engendering -high conceits and presumptuous imaginations, -ministers would have humbled themselves in -their errors, would have confessed and retracted -them, and by an active, though a late, repentance, -have endeavored to redeem them. But, -my Lords, since they had neither sagacity -to foresee, nor justice nor humanity to shun -these oppressive calamities—since not even severe -experience can make them feel, nor the -imminent ruin of their country awaken them -from their stupefaction, the guardian care of -Parliament must interpose. I shall, therefore, -my Lords, propose to you an amendment of -the address to his Majesty, to be inserted immediately -after the two first paragraphs of congratulation -on the birth of a princess, to recommend -an immediate cessation of hostilities, and -the commencement of a treaty to restore peace -and liberty to America, strength and happiness<span class="pagenum" id="Page_136">136</span> -to England, security and permanent prosperity -to both countries. This, my Lords, is yet in -our power; and let not the wisdom and justice -of your Lordships neglect the happy, and, perhaps, -the only opportunity. By the establishment -of irrevocable law, founded on mutual -rights, and ascertained by treaty, these glorious -enjoyments may be firmly perpetuated. And -let me repeat to your Lordships, that the -strong bias of America, at least of the wise and -sounder parts of it, naturally inclines to this -happy and constitutional reconnection with you. -Notwithstanding the temporary intrigues with -France, we may still be assured of their ancient -and confirmed partiality to us. America and -France cannot be congenial. There is something -decisive and confirmed in the honest -American, that will not assimilate to the futility -and levity of Frenchmen.</p> - -<p>My Lords, to encourage and confirm that innate -inclination to this country, founded on -every principle of affection, as well as consideration -of interest; to restore that favorable disposition -into a permanent and powerful reunion -with this country; to revive the mutual -strength of the empire; again to awe the House -of Bourbon, instead of meanly truckling, as<span class="pagenum" id="Page_137">137</span> -our present calamities compel us, to every insult -of French caprice and Spanish punctilio; -to re-establish our commerce; to reassert our -rights and our honor; to confirm our interests, -and renew our glories forever—a consummation -most devoutly to be endeavored! and which, I -trust, may yet arise from reconciliation with -America—I have the honor of submitting to -you the following amendment, which I move to -be inserted after the two first paragraphs of the -address:</p> - -<p>“And that this House does most humbly advise -and supplicate his Majesty to be pleased -to cause the most speedy and effectual measures -to be taken for restoring peace in America; -and that no time may be lost in proposing an -immediate opening of a treaty for the final -settlement of the tranquillity of these invaluable -provinces, by a removal of the unhappy -causes of this ruinous civil war, and by a just -and adequate security against the return of the -like calamities in times to come. And this -House desire to offer the most dutiful assurances -to his Majesty, that they will, in due time, -cheerfully co-operate with the magnanimity and -tender goodness of his Majesty for the preservation -of his people, by such explicit and most<span class="pagenum" id="Page_138">138</span> -solemn declarations, and provisions of fundamental -and irrevocable laws, as may be judged -necessary for the ascertaining and fixing forever -the respective rights of Great Britain and her -colonies.”</p> - -<p>[In the course of this debate, Lord Suffolk, -secretary for the northern department, undertook -to defend the employment of the Indians -in the war. His Lordship contended that, -besides its <em>policy</em> and <em>necessity</em>, the measure was -also allowable on <em>principle</em>; for that “it was -perfectly justifiable to use all the means that -<em>God and nature put into our hands</em>!”]</p> - -<p>I am astonished [exclaimed Lord Chatham, -as he rose], shocked! to hear such principles -confessed—to hear them avowed in this House, -or in this country; principles equally unconstitutional, -inhuman, and unchristian!</p> - -<p>My Lords, I did not intend to have encroached -again upon your attention, but I cannot repress -my indignation. I feel myself impelled by -every duty. My Lords, we are called upon as -members of this House, as men, as Christian -men, to protest against such notions standing -near the Throne, polluting the ear of Majesty. -“That God and nature put into our hands!” I -know not what ideas that Lord may entertain<span class="pagenum" id="Page_139">139</span> -of God and nature, but I know that such abominable -principles are equally abhorrent to religion -and humanity. What! to attribute the sacred -sanction of God and nature to the massacres -of the Indian scalping-knife—to the cannibal -savage, torturing, murdering, roasting, and -eating—literally, my Lords, <em>eating</em> the mangled -victims of his barbarous battles! Such horrible -notions shock every precept of religion, divine -or natural, and every generous feeling of humanity. -And, my Lords, they shock every sentiment -of honor; they shock me as a lover of -honorable war, and a detester of murderous -barbarity.</p> - -<p>These abominable principles, and this more -abominable avowal of them, demand the most -decisive indignation. I call upon that right reverend -bench, those holy ministers of the Gospel, -and pious pastors of our Church—I conjure -them to join in the holy work, and vindicate the -religion of their God. I appeal to the wisdom -and the law of this learned bench, to defend -and support the justice of their country. I call -upon the Bishops to interpose the unsullied -sanctity of their lawn; upon the learned judges, -to interpose the purity of their ermine, to save -us from this pollution. I call upon the honor<span class="pagenum" id="Page_140">140</span> -of your Lordships, to reverence the dignity of -your ancestors, and to maintain your own. I -call upon the spirit and humanity of my country -to vindicate the national character. I invoke -the genius of the Constitution. From the -tapestry that adorns these walls, the immortal -ancestor of this noble Lord frowns with indignation -at the disgrace of his country.<a id="FNanchor_34" href="#Footnote_34" class="fnanchor">34</a> In vain -he led your victorious fleets against the boasted -Armada of Spain; in vain he defended and established -the honor, the liberties, the religion—the -<em>Protestant religion</em>—of this country, against -the arbitrary cruelties of popery and the Inquisition, -if these more than popish cruelties and -inquisitorial practices are let loose among us—to -turn forth into our settlements, among our -ancient connections, friends, and relations, the -merciless cannibal, thirsting for the blood of man, -woman and child, to send forth the infidel savage—against -whom? against your Protestant brethren; -to lay waste their country, to desolate their -dwellings, and extirpate their race and name with -these horrible hell-hounds of savage war—<em>hell-hounds, -I say, of savage war!</em> Spain armed herself -with blood-hounds to extirpate the wretched -natives of America, and we improve on the inhuman -example even of Spanish cruelty; we<span class="pagenum" id="Page_141">141</span> -turn loose these savage hell-hounds against our -brethren and countrymen in America, of the -same language, laws, liberties, and religion, endeared -to us by every tie that should sanctify -humanity.</p> - -<p>My Lords, this awful subject, so important -to our honor, our Constitution, and our religion, -demands the most solemn and effectual inquiry. -And I again call upon your Lordships, and the -united powers of the State, to examine it thoroughly -and decisively, and to stamp upon it an -indelible stigma of the public abhorrence. And -I again implore those holy prelates of our religion -to do away these iniquities from among -us. Let them perform a lustration; let them -purify this House, and this country, from this -sin.</p> - -<p>My Lords, I am old and weak, and at present -unable to say more; but my feelings and indignation -were too strong to have said less. I -could not have slept this night in my bed, nor -reposed my head on my pillow, without giving -this vent to my eternal abhorrence of such preposterous -and enormous principles.</p> - -<blockquote class="end"> - -<p>The warning voice was heard in vain. Chatham’s urgent -anxiety was not enough to carry his amendment. It was lost -by a vote of 97 to 24. The address triumphed; Parliament<span class="pagenum" id="Page_142">142</span> -adjourned; the members went to their Christmas festivities; -the treaty with France was framed and ratified; and the -chance of recovering the colonies was lost forever. Chatham -did not live till the end of the war, but as soon as he learned -that the treaty with France was signed, he knew that the fatal -result was inevitable.</p></blockquote> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_143">143</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="LORD_MANSFIELD">LORD MANSFIELD.</h2> -</div> - -<p>The most formidable rival and opponent of -Lord Chatham was William Murray, known in -history as Lord Mansfield. In point of native -talent it would not be easy to determine which -had the advantage; but it is generally conceded -that Mansfield’s mind was the more carefully -trained, and that his memory was the more fully -enriched with the stores of knowledge. He was -preëminently a lawyer and a lover of the classics; -but Lord Campbell speaks of his familiarity -with modern history as “astounding and even -<em>appalling</em>, for it produces a painful consciousness -of inferiority, and creates remorse for time -misspent.” His career is one of the most extraordinary -examples in English history of an -unquestioning acceptance of the stern conditions -of the highest success.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_144">144</span> -Mansfield’s education was characterized by a -phenominal devotion to some of the severer -kinds of intellectual drudgery. Though he was -fourth son of Lord Stormont and brother of -Lord Dunbar, the Secretary of the Pretender, -he seems from the first to have been fully conscious -that he must rely for distinction upon -his own efforts alone. When he was but fourteen -he had become so familiar with the Latin -language that he wrote and spoke it “with accuracy -and ease,” and in after-life he declared -that there was not one of the orations of Cicero -which he had not, while at Oxford, written -into English, and after an interval, according to -the best of his ability, re-translated into Latin. -Leaving Oxford at the age of twenty-two he -was entered as a student of law at Lincoln’s -Inn in 1727. Lord Campbell says of him: -“When he was admitted to the bar in 1730, he -had made himself acquainted not only with the -international law, but with the codes of all the -most civilized nations, ancient and modern; -he was an elegant classical scholar; he was<span class="pagenum" id="Page_145">145</span> -thoroughly imbued with the literature of his -own country; he had profoundly studied our -mixed constitution; he had a sincere desire to -be of service to his country; and he was animated -by a noble aspiration after honorable -fame.”</p> - -<p>The family of Murray was one of those Scotch -families upon whom a peerage was bestowed by -James I. It is not very singular therefore that -Lord Stormont, the representative of the family, -in the eighteenth century, should, like his -predecessors, remain true to the Stuarts and -the Pretender. William, the fourth son, grew up -in the traditional political beliefs of his ancestors. -While Pitt, therefore, was a Whig, Murray -was a High Tory. In manner they were -as different as in politics. Pitt was ardent -and imperious, Murray was cool and circumspect. -Pitt strove to overwhelm, but Murray -strove to convince. Though Pitt was the great -master of declamatory invective, Murray was -vastly his superior in all the qualities that go to -make up a great debater. The immediate influence<span class="pagenum" id="Page_146">146</span> -of Pitt’s speeches was far more overwhelming, -but the qualities of Murray’s argument -were more persuasive and more permanent -in their influence. Pitt entered the -House of Commons in 1735 at twenty-six; Murray -in 1742 at thirty-seven. During fourteen -years therefore, before 1756 they were each the -great exponents of the political parties to -which they respectively belonged. Murray entered -the House of Lords as Chief Justice and -with the title of Baron Mansfield in the same -year in which Pitt began his great career as -Prime Minister. The power of Pitt was in the -House of Commons, while that of Murray was -in the House of Lords. Pitt’s influence was -over the masses, whose devotion was such that -“they hugged his footmen and even kissed his -horses.” Murray’s power was over the more -thoughtful few who in the end directed public -opinion and moulded public action.</p> - -<p>The character of Murray, like that of his great -rival, was not only above reproach, but was remarkable -for its stern rejection of every thing<span class="pagenum" id="Page_147">147</span> -that tried to turn him aside from his great -purpose. When the Duchess of Marlborough -strove to put him under obligations by sending -him a retainer of a thousand guineas, he returned -nine hundred and ninety-five, with the remark -that a retaining fee was never more nor less than -five guineas. When Newcastle offered him a -pension of £6,000 a year, if he would remain in -the House of Commons, instead of taking the -Bench, he put the offer aside without a moment’s -hesitation, saying: “What merit have -I, that you should lay on this country, for which -so little is done with spirit, the additional burden -of £6,000 a year?” He was Lord Chief -Justice for nearly thirty-two years. Though he -probably did more to strengthen the cause of -the mother country against the colonies than -any other one man, yet his great services have -been no less generously acknowledged in America -than in England. It was Mr. Justice Story -who said: “England and America, and the -civilized world, lie under the deepest obligations -to him. Wherever commerce shall extend<span class="pagenum" id="Page_148">148</span> -its social influences; wherever justice shall be -administered by enlightened and liberal rules; -wherever contracts shall be expounded upon -the eternal principles of right and wrong; -wherever moral delicacy and judicial refinement -shall be infused into the municipal code, at -once to persuade men to be honest and to keep -them so; wherever the intercourse of mankind -shall aim at something more elevated than that -grovelling spirit of barter, in which meanness, -and avarice, and fraud strive for the mastery -over ignorance, credulity, and folly, the name -of Lord Mansfield will be held in reverence by -the good and the wise, by the honest merchant, -the enlightened lawyer, the just statesman, and -the conscientious judge. The proudest monument -of his fame is in the volumes of Burrow, -and Cowper, and Douglas, which we may -fondly hope will endure as long as the language -in which they are written shall continue to instruct -mankind. His judgments should not be -merely referred to and read on the spur of particular -occasions, but should be studied as<span class="pagenum" id="Page_149">149</span> -models of juridical reasoning and eloquence.”</p> - -<p>When the matter of repealing the Stamp Act -came before Parliament, the question turned, -as we have already observed, chiefly on the -subject of the clause declaring the <em>right</em> of Parliament -to levy the tax. While Chatham arrayed -all his powers against the right, Mansfield was -its most strenuous supporter. His speech on -the subject is of great importance to the American -student, because it is by far the most able -and plausible ever delivered in support of the -British policy. It is avowedly directed to the -question of right, not at all to the question of -expediency. Lord Campbell, although inclined -to the doctrines of the Whigs, refers to the -speech as one of arguments to which he “has -never been able to find an answer.” The position -of Mansfield undoubtedly had a very great -influence in determining and strengthening the -policy of the King and of the ministry. The -speech was corrected for the press by the orator’s -own hand, and may be regarded as authentic.</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_150">150</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="LORD_MANSFIELD2">LORD MANSFIELD.<br /> - -<span class="subhead">ON THE RIGHT OF ENGLAND TO TAX AMERICA.<br /> -HOUSE OF LORDS, FEBRUARY 3, 1766.</span></h2> -</div> - -<blockquote class="end"> - -<p>The discussion, of which the speech of Pitt already given, -formed a part, came up on the adoption of the motion declaring -the right of England to tax America,—a motion accompanying -the bill repealing the Stamp Act. The motion was -strenuously opposed, not only by Pitt in the House of Commons, -but also by Lord Camden in the House of Lords. -Camden said: “In my opinion, my Lords, the legislature -have no right to make this law. The sovereign authority, the -omnipotence of the legislature is a favorite doctrine; but there -are some things which you cannot do. You cannot take away -a man’s property, without making him a compensation. You -have no right to condemn a man by bill of attainder without -hearing him. But, though Parliament cannot take away a -man’s property, yet every subject must make contributions, -and this he consents to do by his representative. Notwithstanding -the King, Lords, and Commons could in ancient -times tax other people, they could not tax the clergy.” Lord -Camden then went on to show at length, that the counties -palatine of Wales and of Berwick, were never taxed till they -were represented in Parliament. The same was true, he said, -of Ireland; and the same doctrines should prevail in regard to -America. It was in answer to Lord Camden that the following -speech of Lord Mansfield was made.</p></blockquote> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_151">151</span></p> - -<p class="sal"><span class="smcap">My Lords</span>:</p> - -<p>I shall speak to the question strictly as a -matter of right; for it is a proposition in its -nature so perfectly distinct from the expediency -of the tax, that it must necessarily be taken -separate, if there is any true logic in the world; -but of the expediency or inexpediency I will -say nothing. It will be time enough to speak -upon that subject when it comes to be a question.</p> - -<p>I shall also speak to the distinctions which -have been taken, without any real difference, as -to the nature of the tax; and I shall point out, -lastly, the necessity there will be of exerting the -force of the superior authority of government, -if opposed by the subordinate part of it.</p> - -<p>I am extremely sorry that the question has -ever become necessary to be agitated, and that -there should be a decision upon it. No one in -this House will live long enough to see an end -put to the mischief which will be the result of -the doctrine which has been inculcated; but the -arrow is shot and the wound already given. I -shall certainly avoid personal reflections. No -one has had more cast upon him than myself; -but I never was biased by any consideration of -applause from without, in the discharge of my<span class="pagenum" id="Page_152">152</span> -public duty; and, in giving my sentiments according -to what I thought law, I have relied -upon my own consciousness. It is with great -pleasure I have heard the noble Lord who moved -the resolution express himself in so manly and -sensible a way, when he recommended a dispassionate -debate, while, at the same time, he -urged the necessity of the House coming to such -a resolution, with great dignity and propriety of -argument.</p> - -<p>I shall endeavor to clear away from the question, -all that mass of dissertation and learning -displayed in arguments which have been fetched -from speculative men who have written upon the -subject of government, or from ancient records, -as being little to the purpose. I shall insist that -these records are no proofs of our present Constitution. -A noble Lord has taken up his argument -from the settlement of the Constitution -at the revolution; I shall take up my argument -from the Constitution as it now is. The Constitution -of this country has been always in a moving -state, either gaining or losing something -and with respect to the modes of taxation, -when we get beyond the reign of Edward the -First, or of King John, we are all in doubt and -obscurity. The history of those times is full<span class="pagenum" id="Page_153">153</span> -of uncertainties. In regard to the writs upon -record, they were issued some of them according -to law, and some not according to law; and -such [<i>i. e.</i>, of the latter kind] were those concerning -ship-money, to call assemblies to tax -themselves, or to compel benevolences. Other -taxes were raised from escuage, fees for knights’ -service, and by other means arising out of the -feudal system. Benevolences are contrary to -law; and it is well known how people resisted -the demands of the Crown in the case of ship-money, -and were persecuted by the Court; and -if any set of men were to meet now to lend the -King money, it would be contrary to law, and -a breach of the rights of Parliament.</p> - -<p>I shall now answer the noble Lord particularly -upon the cases he has quoted. With respect -to the Marches of Wales, who were the -borderers, privileged for assisting the King in -his war against the Welsh in the mountains, -their enjoying this privilege of taxing themselves -was but of a short duration, and during -the life of Edward the First, till the Prince of -Wales came to be the King; and then they -were annexed to the Crown, and became subject -to taxes like the rest of the dominions of -England; and from thence came the custom,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_154">154</span> -though unnecessary, of naming Wales and the -town of Monmouth in all proclamations and in -acts of Parliament. Henry the Eighth was the -first who issued writs for it to return two members -to Parliament. The Crown exercised this -right <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">ad libitum</i>, from whence arises the inequality -of representation in our Constitution at -this day. Henry VIII. issued a writ to Calais -to send one burgess to Parliament. One of the -counties palatine [I think he said Durham] was -taxed fifty years to subsidies, before it sent -members to Parliament. The clergy were at -no time unrepresented in Parliament. When -they taxed themselves, it was done with the -concurrence and consent of Parliament, who -permitted them to tax themselves upon their -petition, the Convocation sitting at the same -time with the Parliament. They had, too, their -representatives always sitting in this House, -bishops and abbots; and, in the other House, -they were at no time without a right of voting -singly for the election of members; so that the -argument fetched from the case of the clergy -is not an argument of any force, because they -were at no time unrepresented here.</p> - -<p>The reasoning about the colonies of Great -Britain, drawn from the colonies of antiquity,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_155">155</span> -is a mere useless display of learning; for the -colonies of the Tyrians in Africa, and of the -Greeks in Asia, were totally different from our -system. No nation before ourselves formed -any regular system of colonization, but the -Romans; and their system was a military one, -and of garrisons placed in the principal towns -of the conquered provinces. The States of -Holland were not colonies of Spain; they were -States dependent upon the house of Austria in -a feudal dependence. Nothing could be more -different from our colonies than that flock of -men, as they have been called, who came from -the North and poured into Europe. Those -emigrants renounced all laws, all protection, -all connection with their mother countries. -They chose their leaders, and marched under -their banners to seek their fortunes and establish -new kingdoms upon the ruins of the -Roman empire.</p> - -<p>But our colonies, on the contrary, emigrated -under the sanction of the Crown and Parliament. -They were modelled gradually into their -present forms, respectively, by charters, grants, -and statutes; but they were never separated -from the mother country, or so emancipated as -to become <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">sui juris</i>. There are several sorts of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_156">156</span> -colonies in British America. The charter colonies, -the proprietary governments, and the -King’s colonies. The first colonies were the -charter colonies, such as the Virginia Company; -and these companies had among their -directors members of the privy council and of -both houses of Parliament; they were under -the authority of the privy council, and had -agents resident here, responsible for their proceedings. -So much were they considered as -belonging to the Crown, and not to the King -personally (for there is a great difference, -though few people attend to it), that when the -two Houses, in the time of Charles the First, -were going to pass a bill concerning the colonies, -a message was sent to them by the King -that they were the King’s colonies, and that -the bill was unnecessary, for that the privy -council would take order about them; and the -bill never had the royal assent. The Commonwealth -Parliament, as soon as it was settled, -were very early jealous of the colonies separating -themselves from them; and passed a -resolution or act (and it is a question whether -it is not in force now) to declare and establish -the authority of England over its colonies.</p> - -<p>But if there was no express law, or reason<span class="pagenum" id="Page_157">157</span> -founded upon any necessary inference from an -express law, yet the usage alone would be sufficient -to support that authority; for, have not -the colonies submitted ever since their first establishment -to the jurisdiction of the mother -country? In all questions of property, the -appeals from the colonies have been to the -privy council here; and such causes have been -determined, not by the law of the colonies, but -by the law of England. A very little while -ago, there was an appeal on a question of -limitation in a devise of land with remainders; -and, notwithstanding the intention of the testator -appeared very clear, yet the case was determined -contrary to it, and that the land should -pass according to the law of England. The -colonies have been obliged to recur very frequently -to the jurisdiction here, to settle the -disputes among their own governments. I well -remember several references on this head, when -the late Lord Hardwicke was attorney general, -and Sir Clement Wearg solicitor general. New -Hampshire and Connecticut were in blood -about their differences; Virginia and Maryland -were in arms against each other. This shows -the necessity of one superior decisive jurisdiction, -to which all subordinate jurisdictions may<span class="pagenum" id="Page_158">158</span> -recur. Nothing, my Lords, could be more fatal -to the peace of the colonies at any time, than -the Parliament giving up its authority over -them; for in such a case, there must be an -entire dissolution of government. Considering -how the colonies are composed, it is easy to -foresee there would be no end of feuds and -factions among the several separate governments, -when once there shall be no one government -here or there of sufficient force or authority -to decide their mutual differences; and, -government being dissolved, nothing remains -but that the colonies must either change their -Constitution, and take some new form of government, -or fall under some foreign power. -At present the several forms of their Constitution -are very various, having been produced, as -all governments have been originally, by accident -and circumstances. The forms of government -in every colony were adopted, from time -to time, according to the size of the colony; -and so have been extended again, from time to -time, as the numbers of their inhabitants and -their commercial connections outgrew the first -model. In some colonies, at first there was -only a governor assisted by two or three counsel; -then more were added; afterward courts<span class="pagenum" id="Page_159">159</span> -of justice were erected; then assemblies were -created. Some things were done by instructions -from the secretaries of state; other things -were done by order of the King and council; -and other things by commissions under the -great seal. It is observable, that in consequence -of these establishments from time to time, and -of the dependency of these governments upon -the supreme Legislature at home, the lenity of -each government in the colonies has been extreme -toward the subject; and a great inducement -has been created for people to come and -settle in them. But, if all those governments -which are now independent of each other, -should become independent of the mother country, -I am afraid that the inhabitants of the -colonies are very little aware of the consequences. -They would feel in that case very -soon the hand of power more heavy upon them -in their own governments, than they have yet -done, or have ever imagined.</p> - -<p>The Constitutions of the different colonies -are thus made up of different principles. They -must remain dependent, from the necessity of -things, and their relations to the jurisdiction of -the mother country; or they must be totally -dismembered from it, and form a league of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_160">160</span> -union among themselves against it, which could -not be effected without great violences. No -one ever thought the contrary till the trumpet -of sedition was blown. Acts of Parliament -have been made, not only without a doubt of -their legality, but with universal applause, the -great object of which has been ultimately to fix -the trade of the colonies, so as to centre in the -bosom of that country from whence they took -their original. The Navigation Act shut up -their intercourse with foreign countries.<a id="FNanchor_35" href="#Footnote_35" class="fnanchor">35</a> Their -ports have been made subject to customs and -regulations which have cramped and diminished -their trade. And duties have been laid, affecting -the very inmost parts of their commerce, -and, among others, that of the post; yet all -these have been submitted to peaceably, and -no one ever thought till now of this doctrine, -that the colonies are not to be taxed, regulated, -or bound by Parliament. A few particular -merchants were then, as now, displeased -at restrictions which did not permit them -to make the greatest possible advantages of -their commerce in their own private and peculiar -branches. But, though these few merchants -might think themselves losers in articles which -they had no right to gain, as being prejudicial<span class="pagenum" id="Page_161">161</span> -to the general and national system, yet I must -observe that the colonies, upon the whole, -were benefited by these laws. For these -restrictive laws, founded upon principles of -the most solid policy, flung a great weight of -naval force into the hands of the mother country, -which was to protect its colonies. Without -a union with her, the colonies must have -been entirely weak and defenceless, but they -thus became relatively great, subordinately, -and in proportion as the mother country advanced -in superiority over the rest of the maritime -powers in Europe, to which both mutually -contributed, and of which both have reaped -a benefit, equal to the natural and just relation -in which they both stand reciprocally, of -dependency on one side, and protection on the -other.</p> - -<p>There can be no doubt, my Lords, but that -the inhabitants of the colonies are as much -represented in Parliament, as the greatest part -of the people of England are represented; -among nine millions of whom there are eight -which have no votes in electing members of -Parliament. Every objection, therefore, to -the dependency of the colonies upon Parliament, -which arises to it upon the ground of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_162">162</span> -representation, goes to the whole present Constitution -of Great Britain; and I suppose it -is not meant to new-model <em>that</em> too. People -may form speculative ideas of perfection, and -indulge their own fancies or those of other -men. Every man in this country has his -particular notion of liberty; but perfection -never did, and never can exist in any human -institution. To what purpose, then, are arguments -drawn from a distinction, in which there -is no real difference—of a virtual and actual -representation? A member of Parliament, -chosen for any borough, represents not only -the constituents and inhabitants of that particular -place, but he represents the inhabitants -of every other borough in Great Britain. He -represents the city of London, and all the -other commons of this land, and the inhabitants -of all the colonies and dominions of Great -Britain; and is, in duty and conscience, bound -to take care of their interests.</p> - -<p>I have mentioned the customs and the post -tax. This leads me to answer another distinction, -as false as the above; the distinction of -internal and external taxes. The noble Lord -who quoted so much law, and denied upon -those grounds the right of the Parliament of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_163">163</span> -Great Britain to lay internal taxes upon the -colonies, allowed at the same time that restrictions -upon trade, and duties upon the ports, -were legal. But I cannot see a real difference -in this distinction; for I hold it to be true, that -a tax laid in any place is like a pebble falling -into and making a circle in a lake, till one circle -produces and gives motion to another, and -the whole circumference is agitated from the -centre. For nothing can be more clear than -that a tax of ten or twenty per cent. laid upon -tobacco, either in the ports of Virginia or London, -is a duty laid upon the inland plantations -of Virginia, a hundred miles from the sea, -wheresoever the tobacco grows.</p> - -<p>I do not deny but that a tax may be laid injudiciously -and injuriously, and that people in -such a case may have a right to complain. But -the nature of the tax is not now the question; -whenever it comes to be one, I am for lenity. -I would have no blood drawn. There is, I am -satisfied, no occasion for any to be drawn. A -little time and experience of the inconveniences -and miseries of anarchy, may bring people to -their senses.</p> - -<p>With respect to what has been said or written -upon this subject, I differ from the noble Lord,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_164">164</span> -who spoke of Mr. Otis and his book with contempt, -though he maintained the same doctrine -in some points, while in others he carried it -farther than Otis himself, who allows everywhere -the supremacy of the Crown over the -colonies.<a id="FNanchor_36" href="#Footnote_36" class="fnanchor">36</a> No man, on such a subject, is contemptible. -Otis is a man of consequence -among the people there. They have chosen -him for one of their deputies at the Congress -and general meeting from the respective governments. -It was said, the man is mad. What -then? One madman often makes many. -Masaniello was mad. Nobody doubts it; yet, -for all that, he overturned the government of -Naples. Madness is catching in all popular -assemblies and upon all popular matters. The -book is full of wildness. I never read it till a -few days ago, for I seldom look into such -things. I never was actually acquainted with -the contents of the Stamp Act, till I sent for it -on purpose to read it before the debate was -expected. With respect to authorities in -<em>another House</em>, I know nothing of them. I believe -that I have not been in that House more -than once since I had the honor to be called up -to this; and, if I did know any thing that -passed in the other House, I could not, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_165">165</span> -would not, mention it as an authority here. I -ought not to mention any such authority. I -should think it beneath my own and your Lordship’s -dignity to speak of it.</p> - -<p>I am far from bearing any ill will to the -Americans; they are a very good people, and I -have long known them. I began life with them, -and owe much to them, having been much concerned -in the plantation causes before the privy -council; and so I became a good deal acquainted -with American affairs and people. I -dare say, their heat will soon be over, when -they come to feel a little the consequences of -their opposition to the Legislature. Anarchy -always cures itself; but the ferment will continue -so much the longer, while hot-headed -men there find that there are persons of weight -and character to support and justify them here.</p> - -<p>Indeed, if the disturbances should continue -for a great length of time, force must be the -consequence, an application adequate to the -mischief, and arising out of the necessity of the -case; for force is only the difference between a -superior and subordinate jurisdiction. In the -former, the whole force of the Legislature resides -collectively, and when it ceases to reside, -the whole connection is dissolved. It will, indeed,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_166">166</span> -be to very little purpose that we sit here -enacting laws, and making resolutions, if the -inferior will not obey them, or if we neither can -nor dare enforce them; for then, and then, I -say, of necessity, the matter comes to the -sword. If the offspring are grown too big and -too resolute to obey the parent, you must try -which is the strongest, and exert all the powers -of the mother country to decide the contest.</p> - -<p>I am satisfied, notwithstanding, that time and -a wise and steady conduct may prevent those -extremities which would be fatal to both. I -remember well when it was the violent humor -of the times to decry standing armies and garrisons -as dangerous, and incompatible with the -liberty of the subject. Nothing would do but -a regular militia. The militia are embodied; -they march; and no sooner was the militia law -thus put into execution, but it was then said to -be an intolerable burden upon the subject, and -that it would fall, sooner or later, into the -hands of the Crown. That was the language, -and many counties petitioned against it. This -may be the case with the colonies. In many -places they begin already to feel the effects of -their resistence to government. Interest very -soon divides mercantile people; and, although<span class="pagenum" id="Page_167">167</span> -there may be some mad, enthusiastic, or ill-designing -people in the colonies, yet I am convinced -that the greatest bulk, who have understanding -and property, are still well affected to -the mother country. You have, my Lords, -many friends still in the colonies; and take care -that you do not, by abdicating your own authority, -desert them and yourselves, and lose -them forever.</p> - -<p>In all popular tumults, the worst men bear -the sway at first. Moderate and good men are -often silent for fear or modesty, who, in good -time, may declare themselves. Those who have -any property to lose are sufficiently alarmed already -at the progress of these public violences -and violations, to which every man’s dwelling, -person, and property are hourly exposed. Numbers -of such valuable men and good subjects -are ready and willing to declare themselves for -the support of government in due time, if -government does not fling away its own authority.</p> - -<p>My Lords, the Parliament of Great Britain -has its rights over the colonies; but it may abdicate -its rights.</p> - -<p>There was a thing which I forgot to mention. -I mean, the manuscript quoted by the noble<span class="pagenum" id="Page_168">168</span> -Lord. He tells you that it is there said, that if -the act concerning Ireland had passed, the Parliament -might have abdicated its rights as to -Ireland. In the first place, I heartily wish, my -Lords, that Ireland had not been named, at a -time when that country is of a temper and in a -situation so difficult to be governed; and when -we have already here so much weight upon our -hands, encumbered with the extensiveness, variety, -and importance of so many objects in a -vast and too busy empire, and the national system -shattered and exhausted by a long, bloody, -and expensive war, but more so by our divisions -at home, and a fluctuation of counsels. I wish -Ireland, therefore, had never been named.</p> - -<p>I pay as much respect as any man to the -memory of Lord Chief Justice Hale; but I did -not know that he had ever written upon the -subject; and I differ very much from thinking -with the noble Lord, that this manuscript ought -to be published. So far am I from it, that I -wish the manuscript had never been named; -for Ireland is too tender a subject to be touched. -The case of Ireland is as different as possible -from that of our colonies. Ireland was a conquered -country; it had its <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">pacta conventa</i> and -its <em>regalia</em>. But to what purpose is it to mention<span class="pagenum" id="Page_169">169</span> -the manuscript? It is but the opinion of one -man. When it was written, or for what particular -object it was written, does not appear. -It might possibly be only a work of youth, or -an exercise of the understanding, in sounding -and trying a question problematically. All people, -when they first enter professions, make their -collections pretty early in life; and the manuscript -may be of that sort. However, be it -what it may, the opinion is but problematical; -for the act to which the writer refers never -passed, and Lord Hale only said, that if it had -passed, the Parliament might have abdicated -their right.</p> - -<p>But, my Lords, I shall make this application -of it. You may abdicate your right over the -colonies. Take care, my Lords, how you do -so, for such an act will be irrevocable. Proceed, -then, my Lords, with spirit and firmness; -and, when you shall have established your authority, -it will then be a time to show your -lenity. The Americans, as I said before, are a -very good people, and I wish them exceedingly -well; but they are heated and inflamed. The -noble Lord who spoke before ended with a -prayer. I cannot end better than by saying -to it Amen; and in the words of Maurice, Prince<span class="pagenum" id="Page_170">170</span> -of Orange, concerning the Hollanders: “<em>God -bless this industrious, frugal, and well-meaning, -but easily-deluded people.</em>”</p> - -<blockquote class="end"> - -<p>The Stamp Act was repealed, and the Declaratory Act, thus -advocated by Lord Mansfield, was also passed by a large -majority.</p> - -<p>The positions taken by Lord Mansfield were answered in a -variety of ways by the colonists. What may be called the -American Case, was carefully stated in a “Declaration of -Rights and Grievances,” passed by the New York Congress, -October 19, 1765. The substance of the American claims may -be summarized in the following propositions:</p> - -<p>1. They owed their existence not to Parliament, but to the -Crown. The King, in the exercise of the high sovereignty -then conceded to him, had made them by charter <em>complete -civil communities</em>, with legislatures of their own having power -to lay taxes and do all other acts which were necessary to their -subsistence as distinct governments. Hence,</p> - -<p>2. They stood substantially on the same footing as Scotland -previous to the Union. Like her they were subject to -the Navigation Act, and similar regulations touching the <em>external</em> -relations of the empire; and like her the ordinary legislation -of England did not reach them, nor did the common law -any farther than they chose to adopt it. Hence,</p> - -<p>3. They held themselves amenable in their internal concerns, -not to Parliament, but to the Crown alone. It was to -the <em>King</em> in council or to <em>his</em> courts that they made those occasional -references and appeals, which Lord Mansfield endeavors -to draw into precedents. So “the post tax” spoken -of above, did not originate in Parliament, but in a charter to -an individual which afterward reverted to the Crown, and it -was in this way alone that the post-office in America became<span class="pagenum" id="Page_171">171</span> -connected with that of England. Even the American Declaration -of Independence does not once refer to the British Parliament. -The colonists held that they owed allegiance to the -King only, and hence it was the King’s conduct alone that was -regarded as a just reason for their renouncing their allegiance. -One of their grievances was, that he confederated with others -in “<em>pretended acts of legislation</em>.”</p> - -<p>The Colonists supported their argument by an appeal to -“long-continued usage.” Burke acknowledged the force of -this position, though he drew from it the conclusion merely -that, “to introduce a change now, is both inexpedient and unwise.” -The Colonists, on the contrary, held: “You have no -right to lay the taxes.” The attitude of the colonies is best -studied in the volume of “Prior Documents to Almon’s Remembrancer,” -where all the important papers and the resolutions -of the several colonies are given. See, also, Pilkin’s “Political -History,” Marshall’s “American Colonies,” and vol. i. -of Story, “On the Constitution.” There is an excellent summary -of the debate in the English Parliament, probably written -by Burke, in the <cite>Annual Register</cite>, vol. ix., pp. 35–48; -and a still fuller one embracing the examination of Franklin, -in Hansard’s “Parliamentary History,” vol. xvi., pp. 90–200.</p></blockquote> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_172">172</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="EDMUND_BURKE">EDMUND BURKE.</h2> -</div> - -<p>There is much in the oratory of Edmund -Burke to suggest the amplitude of mind and -the power and scope of intellectual grasp that -characterized Shakespeare. He surveyed every -subject as if standing on an eminence and taking -a view of it in all its relations, however -complex and remote. United with this remarkable -comprehensiveness was also a subtlety -of intellect that enabled him to penetrate the -most complicated relations and unravel the -most perplexed intricacies. Why? Whence? -For what end? With what results? were the -questions that his mind seemed always to be -striving to answer. The special objects to -which he applied himself were the workings of -political institutions, the principles of wise -legislation, and the sources of national security<span class="pagenum" id="Page_173">173</span> -and advancement. <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Rerum cognoscere causas</i>,—to -know the causes of things—in all the multiform -relations of organized society, was the -constant end of his striving. More than any -other one that has written in English he was a -political philosopher. But he was far more -than that. He had a memory of extraordinary -grasp and tenacity; and this, united with a -tireless industry, gave him an affluence of -knowledge that has rarely been equalled. He -had the fancy of a poet, and his imagination -surveyed the whole range of human experience -for illustrations with which to enrich the train -of his thought.</p> - -<p>For the purposes of legislative persuasion -many of Burke’s qualities were a hindrance -rather than a help. His course of reasoning -was often too elaborate to be carried in the -mind of the hearer. His exuberant fancy constantly -tempted him into illustrative excursions -that led the hearer too far away from the -march of the argument. The one thing which -he always found it difficult to do was to restrain<span class="pagenum" id="Page_174">174</span> -the exuberance of his genius. He could not -be straightforward and unadorned. He carried -his wealth with him and displayed it on -all occasions. Mr. Matthew Arnold has very -happily characterized this feature of his mind -as “Asiatic.” “He is the only man,” said -Johnson, “whose common conversation corresponds -with the general fame which he has -in the world. No man of sense could meet -Burke by accident under a gateway to avoid a -shower without being convinced that he was -the first man in England.”</p> - -<p>It is not singular that these characteristics -were often thought to be oppressive. In the -House of Commons he sometimes poured forth -the wealth of his knowledge for hour after hour -till the members were burdened and driven out -of the House in sheer self-defence. This peculiarity -was well described by the satirist who -said:</p> - -<div class="poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i16">“He went on refining,<br /></span> -<span class="i0">And thought of convincing when they thought of dining.”<br /></span> -</div></div> -</div> - -<p class="in0">Erskine, during the delivery of the speech<span class="pagenum" id="Page_175">175</span> -on “Conciliation with America,” crept out -of the House behind the benches on his hands -and knees, and yet afterward wrote that he -thought the speech the most remarkable one of -ancient or modern times.</p> - -<p>But this vast superabundance, this superfluity -of riches, so oppressive to the ear of the hearer, -must ever be a source of pleasure and profit to -the thoughtful reader. It is safe to say that there -is no other oratory of any language or time -that yields so rich a return to the thoughtful -efforts of the genuine student. What Fox said -to members of Parliament in regard to the -speech on the “Nabob of Arcot’s debts,” may be -appropriately said with perhaps even greater -emphasis to American students in regard to -either of the speeches on American affairs: -“Let gentlemen read this speech by day and -meditate on it by night: let them peruse it -again and again, study it, imprint it on their -minds, impress it on their hearts.” After all -that has been written, the student can nowhere -find a more correct and comprehensive account<span class="pagenum" id="Page_176">176</span> -of the causes of the American Revolution than -in the speeches on Taxation and Conciliation.</p> - -<p>Burke’s education had given him peculiar -qualifications for discussing American affairs. -These qualifications were both general and -special. At the age of fourteen he entered -Trinity College in his native city of Dublin, -where he remained six years, performing not -only his regular college duties, but carrying on -a very elaborate course of study of his own devising. -He not only read a greater part of the -poets and orators of antiquity, but he also devoted -himself to philosophy in such a way that -his mind took that peculiar bent which made -him ultimately what has been called “the -<em>philosophical</em> orator” of the language. In 1750, -when he was twenty, he began the study of -law at the Middle Temple, in London. But -his law studies were not congenial to him; and -his great energies, therefore, were chiefly devoted -to the study of what would now be -called Political Science. It was at this period -that he acquired that habit which never deserted<span class="pagenum" id="Page_177">177</span> -him of following out trains of thought to their -end, and framing his views on every subject he -investigated into an organized system. He -was a very careful student of Bolingbroke’s -works; and such an impression had this writer’s -methods of reasoning made upon him, that -when his first pamphlet, “The Vindication of -Natural Society” appeared in 1756, it was -thought by many to be a posthumous work of -Bolingbroke himself. In the same year he -astonished the reading world by publishing at -the age of twenty-six, his celebrated philosophical -treatise on the “Sublime and Beautiful.” -But the best of his thoughts were given to a -contemplation of the forms and principles of -civil society. In 1757 he prepared and published -two volumes on the “European Settlements -in America,” in the course of which, he -showed that he had already traced the character -of the Colonial institutions to the spirit -of their ancestors, and to an indomitable love -of liberty. While preparing these volumes his -prophetic intelligence came to see the boundless<span class="pagenum" id="Page_178">178</span> -resources and the irresistible strength that -the colonies were soon destined to attain. Thus -more than ten years before the troubles with -America began, Burke had filled his mind with -stores of knowledge in regard to American -affairs, and had qualified himself for those marvellous -trains of reasoning with which he came -forward when the Stamp Act was proposed. -The very next year after the publication of his -treatise on the American Colonies, he projected -the <cite>Annual Register</cite>; a work which even -down to the present day has continued to give -a yearly account of the most important occurrences -in all parts of the globe. The undertaking -could hardly have been successful except -in the hands of a man of extraordinary powers. -The first volumes were written almost exclusively -by Burke, and the topics discussed as -well as the events described, offered the best of -opportunities for the exercise of his peculiar -gifts. So great was the demand for the work -that the early volumes rapidly passed through -several editions. The first article in the first<span class="pagenum" id="Page_179">179</span> -volume is devoted to the relations of the American -Colonies to the mother country; and the -preëminence, thus indicated of the American -question in Burke’s mind, continued to be evident -till the outbreak of the Revolution.</p> - -<p>Burke entered Parliament in 1765, and in -January, 1766, he delivered his maiden speech -in opposition to the Stamp Act. The effort -was not simply successful,—it showed so much -compass and power that Pitt publicly complimented -him as “a very able advocate.” In -1771, he received the appointment of agent for -the Colony of New York, a position which he -continued to hold till the outbreak of the war. -Thus, not only by his general attainments and -abilities, but also as the result of his special application -to the subject, he brought to the discussion -of the question qualifications that were -unequalled even by those of Chatham himself.</p> - -<p>Of the speeches delivered by Burke, in all -several hundred in number, only six of the -more important ones have been preserved. -These were written out for publication by the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_180">180</span> -orator himself. In point of compass and variety -of thought as well as in lofty declamation -and withering invective it is probable that the -most remarkable of all his efforts was that on -the “Nabob of Arcot’s debts.” But it is -marked by the author’s greatest faults as well -as by his greatest merits. For five hours he -poured out the pitiless and deluging torrents -of his denunciations; and the reader who now -sits down to the task of mastering the speech is -as certain to be wearied by it as were the members -of the House of Commons when it was delivered. -The speech on “Conciliation with -America” is marred by fewer blemishes, and -its positive merits are of transcendant importance. -That this great utterance exerted a vast -influence on both sides of the Atlantic admits of -no doubt. It is worthy of note, however, that -during the greater part of Burke’s political life -he was in the opposition, and that by those in -power, he was regarded as simply what Lord -Lauderdale once called him, “a splendid madman.” -To this characterization Fox replied:<span class="pagenum" id="Page_181">181</span> -“It is difficult to say whether he is mad or inspired, -but whether the one or the other, every -one must agree that he is a <em>prophet</em>.” And at -a much later period Lord Brougham observed -that “All his predictions, except one momentary -expression, have been more than fulfilled.”</p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_182">182</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"> -<h2 id="MR_BURKE">MR. BURKE.<br /> - -<span class="subhead">ON MOVING RESOLUTIONS FOR CONCILIATION WITH -AMERICA.<br />HOUSE OF COMMONS, MARCH 22, 1775.</span></h2> -</div> - -<blockquote class="end"> - -<p>The repeal of the Grenville Stamp Act had not brought a -return of friendly feeling, for the reason that the Commons -had preferred to adopt the policy of George III. instead of -the policy of Pitt. The <em>right</em> to tax America was affirmed in -the very act withdrawing the tax. When Lord North came -into power he adopted a weak and fatal mixture of concession -and coercion. After the destruction of the tea in Boston -harbor the policy of coercion became dominant. In 1774, the -Charter of Massachusetts was taken away, and the port of -Boston was closed to all commerce. The British Government -labored under the singular delusion that the inconvenience -thus inflicted would bring the colonies at once to terms. It -was boldly said that the question was merely one of shillings -and pence, and that the colonists would give way as soon as -they came to see that their policy entailed a loss. There were -a few who held the opposite ground. On the night of April -19, 1774, Mr. Fuller moved to go “into Committee of the -whole House to take into consideration the duty of threepence -a pound on tea, payable in all his Majesty’s dominions in -America.” It was understood that the aim of the motion was -the repealing of the Act; and it was in seconding the motion -that Mr. Burke made his famous speech on American taxation.</p> - -<p>But the policy advocated in the speech was voted down by<span class="pagenum" id="Page_183">183</span> -182 to 49. Thus the ministry determined to drift on in the -old way. It soon became evident, however, that some change -was imperatively necessary. The method determined upon by -Lord North was an insidious scheme for sowing dissensions -among the colonies, and thus breaking that strength which -comes from united action. His plan was to offer that whenever -a colony, in addition to providing for its own government, -should raise a fair proportion for the general defence, -and should place this sum at the disposal of Parliament, that -colony should be exempted from all further taxation, except -such duties as might be necessary for the regulation of commerce. -He thus designed to array the colonies against one -another, and so open the way for treating with them individually. -This was put forward by North as a plan for <em>conciliation</em>. -While Burke saw clearly the mischief that lurked in the -scheme of the ministry, he was anxious to avail himself of the -<em>idea of conciliation</em>; and with this end in view he brought -forward a series of resolutions “to admit the Americans to an -equal interest in the British Constitution, and to place them at -once on the footing of other Englishmen.” It was in moving -these resolutions that the following speech was made.</p> - -<p>The method of treatment by the orator is so elaborate, that -a brief analysis of the argument may be of service. The -speech is divided into two parts: first, Ought we to make concessions? -and if so, secondly, What ought we to concede? -Under the first head the orator enters with surprising minuteness -of detail into an examination of the condition of the colonies. -He surveys (1) their population; (2) their commerce; -(3) their agriculture, and (4) their fisheries. Having thus determined -their material condition, he shows that force cannot -hold a people possessing such advantages in subjection to the -mother country, if they are inspired with a spirit of liberty. -He shows that such a spirit prevails, and examining it, he -traces it to six sources: (1) the descent of the people; (2) their<span class="pagenum" id="Page_184">184</span> -forms of government; (3) the religious principles of the North; -(4) the social institutions of the South; (5) the peculiarities of -their education, and (6) their remoteness from Great Britain. -He then sums up the first part, by showing that it is vain to -think either (1) of removing these causes, or (2) of regarding -them as criminal. Reaching the conclusion then, that conciliation -is the true policy, he proceeds to inquire what this concession -should be. Obviously it should relate to taxation, -since taxation is the cause of the contest. Referring to the -earlier history of Ireland, Durham, Chester, and Wales, he -shows that in every case, either an independent parliament -existed, or the territory was admitted to representation in the -English Parliament. He then points out that direct representation -of the colonies is impracticable, and he shows the evils -that would result from the adoption of Lord North’s scheme. -Finally, he reaches the conclusion that Americans ought to be -admitted to the privileges of Englishmen—the privilege of -contributing whatever they grant to the Crown through their -own legislature. To this end he presents six resolutions, -with a brief consideration of which he closes the speech.</p> - -<p>This brief outline is perhaps enough to show that the -speech is remarkable for its logical order, and for its happy -grouping of historical facts. But so far from being a collection -of mere matters of fact, it is enriched from beginning to -end with thoughts and reflections from a brain teeming with -ideas on the science of government. It abounds with passages -that have always been greatly admired, and the train of -argument is not interrupted by the introduction of matter only -remotely relevant to the subject in hand. It may be said -therefore to have more of the author’s characteristic merits, -and fewer of his characteristic defects, than any other of his -speeches. Every careful student will probably agree with Sir -James Mackintosh in pronouncing it “the most faultless of -Mr. Burke’s productions.”</p></blockquote> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_185">185</span></p> - -<p class="sal"><span class="smcap">Mr. Speaker</span>:</p> - -<p>I hope, sir, that, notwithstanding the austerity -of the chair, your good nature will incline -you to some degree of indulgence toward human -frailty.<a id="FNanchor_37" href="#Footnote_37" class="fnanchor">37</a> You will not think it unnatural -that those who have an object depending, which -strongly engages their hopes and fears, should -be somewhat inclined to superstition. As I -came into the House full of anxiety about the -event of my motion, I found, to my infinite -surprise, that the grand penal bill, by which we -had passed sentence on the trade and sustenance -of America, is to be returned to us from -the other House.<a id="FNanchor_38" href="#Footnote_38" class="fnanchor">38</a> I do confess, I could not -help looking on this event as a fortunate omen. -I look upon it as a sort of providential favor, -by which we are put once more in possession -of our deliberative capacity, upon a business so -very questionable in its nature, so very uncertain -in its issue. By the return of this bill, -which seemed to have taken its flight forever, -we are, at this very instant, nearly as free to -choose a plan for our American government, as -we were on the first day of the session. If, sir, -we incline to the side of conciliation, we are -not at all embarrassed (unless we please to make -ourselves so) by any incongruous mixture of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_186">186</span> -coercion and restraint. We are therefore called -upon, as it were by a superior warning voice, -again to attend to America; to attend to the -whole of it together; and to review the subject -with an unusual degree of care and calmness.</p> - -<p>Surely it is an awful subject, or there is none -so on this side of the grave. When I first had -the honor of a seat in this House, the affairs of -that continent pressed themselves upon us as -the most important and most delicate object of -parliamentary attention. My little share in -this great deliberation oppressed me. I found -myself a partaker in a very high trust; and -having no sort of reason to rely on the strength -of my natural abilities for the proper execution -of that trust, I was obliged to take more than -common pains to instruct myself in every thing -which relates to our colonies. I was not less -under the necessity of forming some fixed ideas -concerning the general policy of the British -empire. Something of this sort seemed to be -indispensable, in order, amid so vast a fluctuation -of passions and opinions, to concentre my -thoughts; to ballast my conduct; to preserve -me from being blown about by every wind of -fashionable doctrine. I really did not think it<span class="pagenum" id="Page_187">187</span> -safe or manly, to have fresh principles to seek -upon every fresh mail which should arrive from -America.</p> - -<p>At that period I had the fortune to find myself -in perfect concurrence with a large majority -in this House.<a id="FNanchor_39" href="#Footnote_39" class="fnanchor">39</a> Bowing under that high authority, -and penetrated with the sharpness and -strength of that early impression, I have continued -ever since in my original sentiments -without the least deviation. Whether this be -owing to an obstinate perseverance in error, -or to a religious adherence to what appears -to me truth and reason, it is in your equity to -judge.</p> - -<p>Sir, Parliament having an enlarged view of -objects, made, during this interval, more frequent -changes in their sentiment and their conduct -than could be justified in a particular -person upon the contracted scale of private information. -But though I do not hazard any -thing approaching to a censure on the motives -of former Parliaments to all those alterations, -one fact is undoubted—that under them the -state of America has been kept in continual -agitation. Everything administered as remedy -to the public complaint, if it did not produce, -was at least followed by, a heightening of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_188">188</span> -distemper; until, by a variety of experiments, -that important country has been brought into -her present situation—a situation which I will -not miscall, which I dare not name, which I -scarcely know how to comprehend in the terms -of any description.</p> - -<p>In this posture, sir, things stood at the beginning -of the session. About that time, a -worthy member of great parliamentary experience, -who, in the year 1766, filled the chair of -the American committee with much ability, -took me aside, and, lamenting the present aspect -of our politics, told me things were come -to such a pass that our former methods of proceeding -in the House would be no longer tolerated. -That the public tribunal (never too indulgent -to a long and unsuccessful opposition) -would now scrutinize our conduct with unusual -severity. That the very vicissitudes and shiftings -of ministerial measures, instead of convicting -their authors of inconstancy and want of system, -would be taken as an occasion of charging -us with a predetermined discontent, which -nothing could satisfy; while we accused every -measure of vigor as cruel, and every proposal -of lenity as weak and irresolute. The public, -he said, would not have patience to see us play<span class="pagenum" id="Page_189">189</span> -the game out with our adversaries: we must -produce our hand. It would be expected that -those who, for many years, had been active in -such affairs, should show that they had formed -some clear and decided idea of the principles of -colony government, and were capable of drawing -out something like a platform of the ground -which might be laid for future and permanent -tranquillity.</p> - -<p>I felt the truth of what my honorable friend -represented, but I felt my situation too. His -application might have been made with far -greater propriety to many other gentlemen. -No man was, indeed, ever better disposed or -worse qualified for such an undertaking than -myself. Though I gave so far into his opinion -that I immediately threw my thoughts into a -sort of parliamentary form, I was by no means -equally ready to produce them. It generally -argues some degree of natural impotence of -mind, or some want of knowledge of the world, -to hazard plans of government, except from a -seat of authority.<a id="FNanchor_40" href="#Footnote_40" class="fnanchor">40</a> Propositions are made, not -only ineffectually, but somewhat disreputably, -when the minds of men are not properly disposed -for their reception; and, for my part, I -am not ambitious of ridicule—not absolutely -a candidate for disgrace.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_190">190</span> -Besides, sir, to speak the plain truth, I have -in general no very exalted opinion of the virtue -of paper government, nor of any politics in -which the plan is to be wholly separated from -the execution. But when I saw that anger and -violence prevailed every day more and more, -and that things were hastening toward an incurable -alienation of our colonies, I confess my -caution gave way. I felt this as one of those -few moments in which decorum yields to a -higher duty. Public calamity is a mighty leveller, -and there are occasions when any, even the -slightest, chance of doing good, must be laid -hold on, even by the most inconsiderable person.</p> - -<p>To restore order and repose to an empire so -great and so distracted as ours, is merely in the -attempt an undertaking that would ennoble -the flights of the highest genius, and obtain -pardon for the efforts of the meanest understanding. -Struggling a good while with these -thoughts, by degrees I felt myself more firm. -I derived, at length, some confidence from -what in other circumstances usually produces -timidity. I grew less anxious, even from the -idea of my own insignificance. For, judging of -what you are by what you ought to be, I persuaded<span class="pagenum" id="Page_191">191</span> -myself that you would not reject a -reasonable proposition because it had nothing -but its reason to recommend it. On the other -hand, being totally destitute of all shadow of -influence, natural or adventitious, I was very -sure that if my proposition were futile or dangerous—if -it were weakly conceived or improperly -timed, there was nothing exterior to it of -power to awe, dazzle, or delude you. You will -see it just as it is, and you will treat it just as -it deserves.</p> - -<p>The <span class="smcap smaller">PROPOSITION</span> is peace.<a id="FNanchor_41" href="#Footnote_41" class="fnanchor">41</a> Not peace -through the medium of war; not peace to be -hunted through the labyrinth of intricate and -endless negotiations; not peace to arise out of -universal discord, fomented from principle, in -all parts of the empire; not peace to depend on -the juridical determination of perplexing questions, -or the precise marking the shadowy boundaries -of a complex government. It is simple -peace, sought in its natural course and its ordinary -haunts. It is peace sought in the spirit of -peace, and laid in principles purely pacific. I -propose, by removing the ground of the difference, -and by restoring <em>the former unsuspecting -confidence of the colonies in the mother country</em>,<a id="FNanchor_42" href="#Footnote_42" class="fnanchor">42</a> -to give permanent satisfaction to your people;<span class="pagenum" id="Page_192">192</span> -and, far from a scheme of ruling by discord, to -reconcile them to each other in the same act, -and by the bond of the very same interest, -which reconciles them to British government.</p> - -<p>My idea is nothing more. Refined policy -ever has been the parent of confusion, and ever -will be so as long as the world endures. Plain -good intention, which is as easily discovered at -the first view as fraud is surely detected at last, -is (let me say) of no mean force in the government -of mankind. Genuine simplicity of heart -is a healing and cementing principle. My plan, -therefore, being formed upon the most simple -grounds imaginable, may disappoint some people -when they hear it. It has nothing to recommend -it to the pruriency of curious ears. -There is nothing at all new and captivating in -it. It has nothing of the splendor of the -project which has been lately laid upon your -table by the noble Lord in the blue ribbon.<a id="FNanchor_43" href="#Footnote_43" class="fnanchor">43</a> -It does not propose to fill your lobby with -squabbling colony agents, who will require the -interposition of your mace at every instant to -keep the peace among them. It does not institute -a magnificent auction of finance, where -captivated provinces come to general ransom -by bidding against each other, until you knock<span class="pagenum" id="Page_193">193</span> -down the hammer, and determine a proportion -of payments beyond all the powers of algebra -to equalize and settle.</p> - -<p>The plan which I shall presume to suggest -derives, however, one great advantage from the -proposition and registry of that noble Lord’s -project. The idea of conciliation is admissible. -First, the House, in accepting the resolution -moved by the noble Lord, has admitted, notwithstanding -the menacing front of our address,<a id="FNanchor_44" href="#Footnote_44" class="fnanchor">44</a> -notwithstanding our heavy bill of pains -and penalties, that we do not think ourselves -precluded from all ideas of free grace and -bounty.</p> - -<p>The House has gone farther; it has declared -conciliation admissible, <em>previous</em> to any submission -on the part of America. It has even shot -a good deal beyond that mark, and has admitted -that the complaints of our former mode -of exerting the right of taxation were not -wholly unfounded. That right, thus exerted, -is allowed to have had something reprehensible -in it, something unwise, or something grievous; -since, in the midst of our heat and resentment, -we, of ourselves, have proposed a capital alteration, -and, in order to get rid of what seemed -so very exceptionable, have instituted a mode<span class="pagenum" id="Page_194">194</span> -that is altogether new; one that is, indeed, -wholly alien from all the ancient methods and -forms of Parliament.</p> - -<p>The <em>principle</em> of this proceeding is large -enough for my purpose. The means proposed -by the noble Lord for carrying his ideas into -execution, I think, indeed, are very indifferently -suited to the end; and this I shall endeavor to -show you before I sit down. But, for the present, -I take my ground on the admitted principle. -I mean to give peace. Peace implies reconciliation; -and, where there has been a material dispute, -reconciliation does in a manner always -imply concession on the one part or on the -other. In this state of things I make no difficulty -in affirming that the proposal ought to -originate from us. Great and acknowledged -force is not impaired, either in effect or in -opinion, by an unwillingness to exert itself. -The superior power may offer peace with honor -and with safety. Such an offer from such a -power will be attributed to magnanimity. But -the concessions of the weak are the concessions -of fear. When such a one is disarmed, he is -wholly at the mercy of his superior, and he loses -forever that time and those chances which, as -they happen to all men, are the strength and -resources of all inferior power.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_195">195</span> -The capital leading questions on which you -must this day decide, are these two: <em>First, -whether you ought to concede; and, secondly, -what your concession ought to be</em>.</p> - -<p>On the first of these questions we have -gained, as I have just taken the liberty of observing -to you, some ground. But I am sensible -that a good deal more is still to be done. -Indeed, sir, to enable us to determine both on -the one and the other of these great questions -with a firm and precise judgment, I think it -may be necessary to consider distinctly.</p> - -<p>The true <em>nature</em> and the peculiar <em>circumstances</em> -of the object which we have before us; -because, after all our struggle, whether we will -or not, we must govern America according to -that nature and to those circumstances, and -not according to our imaginations; not according -to abstract ideas of right; by no means -according to mere general theories of government, -the resort to which appears to me, in our -present situation, no better than arrant trifling. -I shall therefore endeavor, with your leave, to -lay before you some of the most material of -these circumstances in as full and as clear a -manner as I am able to state them.</p> - -<p>(1) The first thing that we have to consider<span class="pagenum" id="Page_196">196</span> -with regard to the nature of the object, is the -number of people in the colonies. I have -taken for some years a good deal of pains on -that point. I can by no calculation justify -myself in placing the number below two millions -of inhabitants of our own European blood -and color, besides at least five hundred thousand -others, who form no inconsiderable part of -the strength and opulence of the whole. This, -sir, is, I believe, about the true number. -There is no occasion to exaggerate, where -plain truth is of so much weight and importance. -But whether I put the present numbers -too high or too low, is a matter of little -moment. Such is the strength with which -population shoots in that part of the world, -that, state the numbers as high as we will, -while the dispute continues, the exaggeration -ends. While we are discussing any given magnitude, -they are grown to it. While we spend -our time in deliberating on the mode of governing -two millions, we shall find we have -two millions more to manage. Your children -do not grow faster from infancy to manhood, -than they spread from families to communities, -and from villages to nations.<a id="FNanchor_45" href="#Footnote_45" class="fnanchor">45</a></p> - -<p>I put this consideration of the present and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_197">197</span> -the growing numbers in the front of our deliberation; -because, sir, this consideration will -make it evident to a blunter discernment than -yours, that no partial, narrow, contracted, -pinched, occasional system will be at all suitable -to such an object. It will show you that -it is not to be considered as one of those -<em>minima</em><a id="FNanchor_46" href="#Footnote_46" class="fnanchor">46</a> which are out of the eye and consideration -of the law; not a paltry excrescence of -the state; not a mean dependent, who may be -neglected with little damage, and provoked -with little danger. It will prove that some -degree of care and caution is required in the -handling such an object; it will show that you -ought not, in reason, to trifle with so large a -mass of the interests and feelings of the human -race. You could at no time do so without -guilt; and, be assured, you will not be able to -do it long with impunity.</p> - -<p>But the population of this country, the great -and growing population, though a very important -consideration, will lose much of its weight, -if not combined with other circumstances. -The commerce of your colonies is out of all -proportion beyond the numbers of the people. -This ground of their commerce, indeed, has -been trod some days ago, and with great<span class="pagenum" id="Page_198">198</span> -ability, by a distinguished person at your bar.<a id="FNanchor_47" href="#Footnote_47" class="fnanchor">47</a> -This gentleman, after thirty-five years—it is so -long since he appeared at the same place to -plead for the commerce of Great Britain—has -come again before you to plead the same -cause, without any other effect of time, than -that, to the fire of imagination and extent -of erudition which even then marked him as -one of the first literary characters of his age, -he has added a consummate knowledge in the -commercial interest of his country, formed by a -long course of enlightened and discriminating -experience.</p> - -<p>Sir, I should be inexcusable in coming after -such a person with any detail, if a great part of -the members who now fill the House had not -the misfortune to be absent when he appeared -at your bar. Besides, sir, I propose to take the -matter at periods of time somewhat different -from his. There is, if I mistake not, a point of -view, from whence, if you will look at this subject, -it is impossible that it should not make an -impression upon you.</p> - -<p>I have in my hand two accounts: one a -comparative state of the export trade of -England to its colonies as it stood in the year -1704, and as it stood in the year 1772; the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_199">199</span> -other a state of the export trade of this country -to its colonies alone, as it stood in 1772, compared -with the whole trade of England to -all parts of the world, the colonies included, -in the year 1704. They are from good vouchers; -the latter period from the accounts on -your table, the earlier from an original manuscript -of Davenant, who first established the -inspector general’s office, which has been -ever since his time so abundant a source of -parliamentary information.<a id="FNanchor_48" href="#Footnote_48" class="fnanchor">48</a></p> - -<p>The export trade to the colonies consists -of three great branches: the African, which, -terminating almost wholly in the colonies, must -be put to the account of their commerce; the -West Indian, and the North American. All -these are so interwoven, that the attempt to -separate them would tear to pieces the contexture -of the whole, and, if not entirely destroy, -would very much depreciate the value of all the -parts. I therefore consider these three denominations -to be, what in effect they are, one -trade.</p> - -<p>The trade to the colonies, taken on the export -side, at the beginning of this century, that is, in -the year 1704, stood thus:</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_200">200</span></p> - -<table class="table200" summary="Exports in 1704"> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Exports to North America and the West Indies</td> - <td class="tdr">£483,265</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">To Africa</td> - <td class="tdr">86,665</td></tr> - <tr> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdr"><span class="bt">£569,930</span></td></tr> -</table> - -<p>In the year 1772, which I take as a middle -year between the highest and lowest of those -lately laid on your table, the account was as -follows:</p> - -<table class="table200" summary="Exports in 1772"> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">To North America and the West Indies</td> - <td class="tdr">£4,791,734</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">To Africa</td> - <td class="tdr">866,398</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">To which, if you add the export trade from Scotland, which had in 1704 no existence</td> - <td class="tdr">364,000</td></tr> - <tr> - <td> </td> - <td class="tdr"><span class="bt">£6,022,132</span></td></tr> -</table> - -<p>From five hundred and odd thousand, it has -grown to six millions. It has increased no -less than twelve-fold. This is the state of the -colony trade, as compared with itself at these -two periods, within this century; and this is -matter for meditation. But this is not all. -Examine my second account. See how the export -trade to the colonies alone in 1772 stood -in the other point of view, that is, as compared -to the whole trade of England in 1704.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_201">201</span></p> - -<table class="table200" summary="Exports in 1704 vs. 1772"> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">The whole export trade of England, including that to the colonies, in 1704</td> - <td class="tdr">£6,509,000</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">Exported to the colonies alone, in 1772</td> - <td class="tdr">6,024,000</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdr l2">Difference</td> - <td class="tdr"><span class="bt">£485,000</span></td></tr> -</table> - -<p>The trade with America alone is now within -less than £500,000 of being equal to what this -great commercial nation, England, carried on at -the beginning of this century with the whole -world! If I had taken the largest year of those -on your table, it would rather have exceeded. -But, it will be said, is not this American trade -an unnatural protuberance, that has drawn the -juices from the rest of the body? The reverse. -It is the very food that has nourished every other -part into its present magnitude. Our general -trade has been greatly augmented, and augmented -more or less in almost every part to which -it ever extended, but with this material difference, -that of the six millions which in the beginning -of the century constituted the whole -mass of our export commerce, the colony trade -was but one twelfth part; it is now (as a part -of sixteen millions) considerably more than a -third of the whole. This is the relative proportion<span class="pagenum" id="Page_202">202</span> -of the importance of the colonies of these -two periods; and all reasoning concerning our -mode of treating them must have this proportion -as its basis, or it is a reasoning weak, rotten, -and sophistical.<a id="FNanchor_49" href="#Footnote_49" class="fnanchor">49</a></p> - -<p>Mr. Speaker, I cannot prevail on myself to -hurry over this great consideration. It is good -for us to be here. We stand where we have an -immense view of what is, and what is past. -Clouds, indeed, and darkness, rest upon the future. -Let us, however, before we descend from -this noble eminence, reflect that this growth of -our national prosperity has happened within the -short period of the life of man. It has happened -within sixty-eight years. There are those alive -whose memory might touch the two extremities. -For instance, my Lord Bathurst might remember -all the stages of the progress. He was in -1704 of an age at least to be made to comprehend -such things. He was then old enough “<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">acta -parentum jam legere et quæ sit poterit cognoscere -virtus</i>.”<a id="FNanchor_50" href="#Footnote_50" class="fnanchor">50</a> Suppose, sir, that the angel of this -auspicious youth, foreseeing the many virtues -which made him one of the most amiable, as he -is one of the most fortunate men of his age, had -opened to him in vision, that when, in the fourth -generation, the third prince of the House of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_203">203</span> -Brunswick had sat twelve years on the throne -of that nation, which, by the happy issue of -moderate and healing councils, was to be made -Great Britain, he should see his son, Lord -Chancellor of England, turn back the current of -hereditary dignity to its fountain, and raise him -to a higher rank of peerage, while he enriched the -family with a new one. If, amid these bright -and happy scenes of domestic honor and prosperity, -that angel should have drawn up the -curtain, and unfolded the rising glories of his -country, and while he was gazing with admiration -on the then commercial grandeur of England, -the genius should point out to him a little -speck, scarce visible in the mass of the national -interest, a small seminal principle rather than a -formed body, and should tell him: “Young man, -there is America—which at this day serves for -little more than to amuse you with stories of -savage men and uncouth manners; yet shall, before -you taste death, show itself equal to the -whole of that commerce which now attracts the -envy of the world. Whatever England has been -growing to by a progressive increase of improvement, -brought in by varieties of people, by succession -of civilizing conquests and civilizing -settlements in a series of seventeen hundred<span class="pagenum" id="Page_204">204</span> -years, you shall see as much added to her by -America in the course of a single life!” If -this state of his country had been foretold to -him, would it not require all the sanguine -credulity of youth, and all the fervid glow of -enthusiasm, to make him believe it? Fortunate -man, he has lived to see it! Fortunate indeed, -if he lived to see nothing to vary the prospect -and cloud the setting of his day!</p> - -<p>Excuse me, sir, if, turning from such thoughts, -I resume this comparative view once more. -You have seen it on a large scale; look at it -on a small one. I will point out to your attention -a particular instance of it in the single -province of Pennsylvania. In the year 1704 -that province called for £11,459 value of -your commodities, native and foreign. This -was the whole. What did it demand in 1772? -Why nearly fifty times as much; for in that -year the export to Pennsylvania was £507,909, -nearly equal to the export to all the colonies -together in the first period.</p> - -<p>I choose, sir, to enter into these minute and -particular details, because generalities, which, -in all other cases are apt to heighten and raise -the subject, have here a tendency to sink it. -When we speak of the commerce with our<span class="pagenum" id="Page_205">205</span> -colonies, fiction lags after truth; invention is -unfruitful, and imagination cold and barren.</p> - -<p>So far, sir, as to the importance of the object -in the view of its commerce, as concerned in -the exports from England. If I were to detail -the imports, I could show how many enjoyments -they procure, which deceive the burden -of life; how many materials which invigorate -the springs of national industry, and extend -and animate every part of our foreign and -domestic commerce. This would be a curious -subject indeed; but I must prescribe bounds to -myself in a matter so vast and various.</p> - -<p>(3) I pass, therefore, to the colonies in -another point of view—their agriculture. This -they have prosecuted with such a spirit, that, -besides feeding plentifully their own growing -multitude, their annual export of grain, comprehending -rice, has, some years ago, exceeded -a million in value. Of their last harvest I am -persuaded they will export much more. At -the beginning of the century, some of these -colonies imported corn from the mother country. -For some time past the old world has -been fed from the new. The scarcity which -you have felt would have been a desolating -famine, if this child of your old age, with a true<span class="pagenum" id="Page_206">206</span> -filial piety, with a Roman charity, had not put -the full breast of its youthful exuberance to -the mouth of its exhausted parent.<a id="FNanchor_51" href="#Footnote_51" class="fnanchor">51</a></p> - -<p>As to the wealth which the colonies have -drawn from the sea by their fisheries, you had -all that matter fully opened at your bar. You -surely thought those acquisitions of value, for -they seemed even to excite your envy; and yet, -the spirit by which that enterprising employment -has been exercised, ought rather, in my -opinion, to have raised your esteem and admiration. -And pray, sir, what in the world is equal -to it? Pass by the other parts, and look at the -manner in which the people of New England -have of late carried on the whale fishery. -While we follow them among the tumbling -mountains of ice, and behold them penetrating -into the deepest frozen recesses of Hudson’s -Bay and Davis’ Straits—while we are looking -for them beneath the arctic circle, we hear that -they have pierced into the opposite region of -polar cold—that they are at the antipodes, and -engaged under the frozen Serpent of the south. -Falkland Island, which seemed too remote and -romantic an object for the grasp of national -ambition, is but a stage and resting-place in the -progress of their victorious industry. Nor is<span class="pagenum" id="Page_207">207</span> -the equinoctial heat more discouraging to them -than the accumulated winter of both the poles. -We know that while some of them draw the -line, and strike the harpoon on the coast of -Africa, others run the longitude, and pursue -their gigantic game along the coast of Brazil. -No sea but what is vexed by their fisheries. -No climate that is not witness to their toils. -Neither the perseverance of Holland, nor the -activity of France, nor the dexterous and firm -sagacity of English enterprise, ever carried this -most perilous mode of hardy industry to the -extent to which it has been pushed by this -recent people—a people who are still, as it -were, but in the gristle, and not yet hardened -into the bone of manhood. When I contemplate -these things—when I know that the -colonies in general owe little or nothing to any -care of ours, and that they are not squeezed -into this happy form by the constraints of -watchful and suspicious government, but that, -through a wise and salutary neglect, a generous -nature has been suffered to take her own way -to perfection—when I reflect upon these effects—when -I see how profitable they have been to -us, I feel all the pride of power sink, and -all presumption in the wisdom of human contrivances<span class="pagenum" id="Page_208">208</span> -melt, and die away within me. My -rigor relents. I pardon something to the spirit -of liberty.<a id="FNanchor_52" href="#Footnote_52" class="fnanchor">52</a></p> - -<p>I am sensible, sir, that all which I have asserted -in my detail is admitted in the gross; -but that quite a different conclusion is drawn -from it. America, gentlemen say, is a noble -object. It is an object well worth fighting for. -Certainly it is, if fighting a people be the best -way of gaining them. Gentlemen in this respect -will be led to their choice of means by -their complexions and their habits. Those -who understand the military art will, of course, -have some predilection for it. Those who wield -the thunder of the State may have more confidence -in the efficacy of arms. But I confess, -possibly for want of this knowledge, my opinion -is much more in favor of prudent management -than of force; considering force not as an odious, -but a feeble, instrument for preserving a -people so numerous, so active, so growing, so -spirited as this, in a profitable and subordinate -connection with us.</p> - -<p>First, sir, permit me to observe, that the use -of force alone is but <em>temporary</em>. It may subdue -for a moment, but it does not remove the necessity -of subduing again; and a nation is not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_209">209</span> -governed which is perpetually to be conquered.</p> - -<p>My next objection is its <em>uncertainty</em>. Terror -is not always the effect of force; and an armament -is not a victory. If you do not succeed, -you are without resource; for, conciliation failing, -force remains; but, force failing, no farther -hope of reconciliation is left. Power and authority -are sometimes bought by kindness, but -they can never be begged as alms by an impoverished -and defeated violence.</p> - -<p>A farther objection to force is, that you <em>impair -the object</em> by your very endeavors to preserve -it. The thing you fought for is not the -thing which you recover; but depreciated, -sunk, wasted, and consumed in the contest. -Nothing less will content me than <em>whole</em> -America. I do not choose to consume its -strength along with our own, because in all -parts it is the British strength that I consume. -I do not choose to be caught by a foreign -enemy at the end of this exhausting conflict, -and still less in the midst of it. I may escape; -but I can make no insurance against such an -event. Let me add, that I do not choose -wholly to break the American spirit, because it -is the spirit that has made the country.</p> - -<p>Lastly, we have no sort of <em>experience</em> in favor<span class="pagenum" id="Page_210">210</span> -of force as an instrument in the rule of our colonies. -Their growth and their utility have been -owing to methods altogether different. Our -ancient indulgence has been said to be pursued -to a fault. It may be so; but we know, if feeling -is evidence, that our fault was more tolerable -than our attempt to mend it; and our sin -far more salutary than our penitence.</p> - -<p>These, sir, are my reasons for not entertaining -that high opinion of untried force, by which -many gentlemen, for whose sentiments in other -particulars I have great respect, seem to be so -greatly captivated.</p> - -<p>But there is still behind a third consideration -concerning this object, which serves to determine -my opinion on the sort of policy which ought -to be pursued in the management of America, -even more than its population and its commerce—I -mean its temper and character. In this -character of the Americans <em>a love of freedom</em> -is the predominating feature, which marks and -distinguishes the whole; and, as an ardent is -always a jealous affection, your colonies become -suspicious, restive, and untractable, whenever -they see the least attempt to wrest from them -by force, or shuffle from them by chicane, what -they think the only advantage worth living for.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_211">211</span> -This fierce spirit of liberty is stronger in the -English colonies, probably, than in any other -people of the earth, and this from a variety of -powerful causes, which, to understand the true -temper of their minds, and the direction which -this spirit takes, it will not be amiss to lay open -somewhat more largely.</p> - -<p>First, the people of the colonies are descendants -of Englishmen. England, sir, is a nation -which still, I hope, respects, and formerly -adored her freedom. The colonists emigrated -from you when this part of your character was -most predominant<a id="FNanchor_53" href="#Footnote_53" class="fnanchor">53</a>; and they took this bias -and direction the moment they parted from -your hands. They are, therefore, not only devoted -to liberty, but to liberty according to English -ideas and on English principles. Abstract -liberty, like other mere abstractions, is not to -be found. Liberty inheres in some sensible -object; and every nation has formed to itself -some favorite point which, by way of eminence, -becomes the criterion of their happiness. It -happened you know, sir, that the great contests -for freedom in this country were, from the -earliest times chiefly upon the question of taxing. -Most of the contests in the ancient commonwealths -turned primarily on the right of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_212">212</span> -election of magistrates, or on the balance among -the several orders of the State. The question -of money was not with them so immediate. -But in England it was otherwise. On this point -of taxes the ablest pens and most eloquent -tongues have been exercised; the greatest -spirits have acted and suffered. In order to -give the fullest satisfaction concerning the importance -of this point, it was not only necessary -for those who in argument defended the excellence -of the English Constitution, to insist on -this privilege of granting money as a dry point -of fact, and to prove that the right had been -acknowledged in ancient parchments and blind -usages to reside in a certain body called the -House of Commons. They went much farther: -they attempted to prove (and they succeeded) -that in theory it ought to be so, from the particular -nature of a House of Commons, as an -immediate representative of the people, whether -the old records had delivered this oracle or not. -They took infinite pains to inculcate, as a -fundamental principle, that, in all monarchies, -the people must, in effect, themselves, mediately -or immediately, possess the power of granting -their own money, or no shadow of liberty could -subsist. The colonies draw from you, as with<span class="pagenum" id="Page_213">213</span> -their life-blood, those ideas and principles. -Their love of liberty, as with you, fixed and attached -on this specific point of taxing. Liberty -might be safe or might be endangered -in twenty other particulars, without their being -much pleased or alarmed. Here they felt its -pulse, and, as they found that beat, they -thought themselves sick or sound. I do not -say whether they were right or wrong in applying -your general arguments to their own case. -It is not easy, indeed, to make a monopoly of -theorems and corollaries. The fact is, that -they did thus apply those general arguments; -and your mode of governing them, whether -through lenity or indolence, through wisdom or -mistake, confirmed them in the imagination -that they, as well as you, had an interest in -these common principles.</p> - -<p>They were further confirmed in these pleasing -errors by the form of their provincial legislative -assemblies. Their governments are popular -in a high degree; some are merely popular; -in all, the popular representative is the most -weighty;<a id="FNanchor_54" href="#Footnote_54" class="fnanchor">54</a> and this share of the people in their -ordinary government never fails to inspire them -with lofty sentiments, and with a strong aversion -from whatever tends to deprive them of -their chief importance.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_214">214</span> -If any thing were wanting to this necessary -operation of the form of government, religion -would have given it a complete effect. Religion, -always a principle of energy, in this new -people is no way worn out or impaired; and -their mode of professing it is also one main -cause of this free spirit. The people are Protestants; -and of that kind which is the most -averse to all implicit submission of mind and -opinion. This is a persuasion not only favorable -to liberty, but built upon it. I do not -think, sir, that the reason of this averseness in -the dissenting churches from all that looks like -absolute government, is so much to be sought -in their religious tenets as in their history. -Everyone knows that the Roman Catholic religion -is at least coeval with most of the governments -where it prevails; that it has generally -gone hand in hand with them; and received -great favor and every kind of support -from authority. The Church of England, too, -was formed from her cradle under the nursing -care of regular government. But the dissenting -interests have sprung up in direct opposition -to all the ordinary powers of the world, -and could justify that opposition only on a -strong claim to natural liberty. Their very<span class="pagenum" id="Page_215">215</span> -existence depended on the powerful and unremitted -assertion of that claim. All Protestantism, -even the most cold and passive, is a -kind of dissent. But the religion most prevalent -in our northern colonies is a refinement -on the principle of resistance; it is the dissidence -of dissent; and the Protestantism of the -Protestant religion. This religion, under a variety -of denominations, agreeing in nothing but -in the communion of the spirit of liberty, is -predominant in most of the northern provinces; -where the Church of England, notwithstanding -its legal rights, is in reality no more than a sort -of private sect, not composing, most probably, -the tenth of the people. The colonists left -England when this spirit was high, and in the -emigrants was the highest of all; and even that -stream of foreigners, which has been constantly -flowing into these colonies, has, for the greatest -part, been composed of dissenters from the establishments -of their several countries, and -have brought with them a temper and character -far from alien to that of the people with whom -they mixed.</p> - -<p>Sir, I can perceive by their manner that some -gentlemen object to the latitude of this description, -because in the southern colonies the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_216">216</span> -Church of England forms a large body, and has -a regular establishment. It is certainly true. -There is, however, a circumstance attending -these colonies, which, in my opinion, fully counterbalances -this difference, and makes the spirit -of liberty still more high and haughty than in -those to the northward. It is that in Virginia -and the Carolinas they have a vast multitude -of <em>slaves</em>. Where this is the case in any part -of the world, those who are free are by far the -most proud and jealous of their freedom. Freedom -is to them not only an enjoyment, but a -kind of rank and privilege. Not seeing there -that freedom, as in countries where it is a common -blessing, and as broad and general as the -air, may be united with much abject toil, with -great misery, with all the exterior of servitude, -liberty looks, among them, like something that -is more noble and liberal. I do not mean, sir, -to commend the superior morality of this sentiment, -which has at least as much pride as virtue -in it; but I cannot alter the nature of man. -The fact is so; and these people of the southern -colonies are much more strongly, and with -a higher and more stubborn spirit, attached to -liberty than those to the northward. Such were -all the ancient commonwealths; such were our<span class="pagenum" id="Page_217">217</span> -Gothic ancestors; such, in our days, were the -Poles, and such will be all masters of slaves, who -are not slaves themselves. In such a people the -haughtiness of domination combines with the -spirit of freedom, fortifies it, and renders it invincible.</p> - -<p>Permit me, sir, to add another circumstance -in our colonies, which contributes no mean part -toward the growth and effect of this untractable -spirit—I mean their <em>education</em>. In no country -perhaps in the world is the law so general a -study. The profession itself is numerous and -powerful; and in most provinces it takes the -lead. The greater number of the deputies sent -to Congress were lawyers. But all who read, -and most do read, endeavor to obtain some -smattering in that science. I have been told -by an eminent bookseller, that in no branch of -his business, after tracts of popular devotion, -were so many books as those on the law exported -to the Plantations. The colonists have -now fallen into the way of printing them for -their own use. I hear that they have sold nearly -as many of Blackstone’s Commentaries in -America as in England. General Gage marks -out this disposition very particularly in a letter -on your table. He states that all the people<span class="pagenum" id="Page_218">218</span> -in his government are lawyers, or smatterers in -law; and that in Boston they have been enabled, -by successful chicane,<a id="FNanchor_55" href="#Footnote_55" class="fnanchor">55</a> wholly to evade -many parts of one of your capital penal constitutions. -The smartness of debate will say that -this knowledge ought to teach them more clearly -the rights of legislature, their obligations to -obedience, and the penalties of rebellion. All -this is mighty well. But my honorable and -learned friend [the Attorney-General, afterward -Lord Thurlow] on the floor, who condescends to -mark what I say for animadversion, will disdain -that ground. He has heard, as well as I, that -when great honors and great emoluments do -not win over this knowledge to the service of -the State, it is a formidable adversary to government. -If the spirit be not tamed and broken -by these happy methods, it is stubborn and -litigious. <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Abeunt studia in mores.</i> This study -renders men acute, inquisitive, dexterous, -prompt in attack, ready in defence, full of resources. -In other countries, the people, more -simple and of a less mercurial cast, judge of -an ill principle in government only by an actual -grievance. Here they anticipate the evil, and -judge of the pressure of the grievance by the -badness of the principle. They augur misgovernment<span class="pagenum" id="Page_219">219</span> -at a distance; and snuff the approach -of tyranny in every tainted breeze.</p> - -<p>The last cause of this disobedient spirit in -the colonies is hardly less powerful than the -rest, as it is not merely moral, but laid deep in -the natural constitution of things. Three thousand -miles of ocean lie between you and them. -No contrivance can prevent the effect of this -distance in weakening government. Seas roll -and months pass between the order and the execution; -and the want of a speedy explanation -of a single point is enough to defeat the whole -system. You have, indeed, “winged ministers” -of vengeance, who carry your bolts in their -pouches to the remotest verge of the sea.<a id="FNanchor_56" href="#Footnote_56" class="fnanchor">56</a> But -there a power steps in that limits the arrogance -of raging passion and furious elements, and -says: “So far shalt thou go, and no farther.” -Who are you, that should fret and rage, and -bite the chains of nature? Nothing worse happens -to you than does to all nations who have -extensive empire; and it happens in all the -forms into which empire can be thrown. In -large bodies the circulation of power must be -less vigorous at the extremities. Nature has -said it. The Turk cannot govern Egypt, and -Arabia, and Koordistan as he governs Thrace;<span class="pagenum" id="Page_220">220</span> -nor has he the same dominion in Crimea and -Algiers which he has at Broosa and Smyrna. -Despotism itself is obliged to truck and huckster. -The Sultan gets such obedience as he -can. He governs with a loose rein, that he may -govern at all; and the whole of the force and -vigor of his authority in his centre is derived -from a prudent relaxation in all his borders. -Spain, in her provinces, is, perhaps, not so well -obeyed as you are in yours. She complies too; -she submits; she watches times. This is the -immutable condition, the eternal law, of extensive -and detached empire.</p> - -<p>Then, sir, from these six capital sources of -descent, of form of government, of religion in -the northern provinces, of manners in the southern, -of education, of the remoteness of situation -from the first mover of government—from all -these causes a fierce spirit of liberty has grown -up. It has grown with the growth of the -people in your colonies, and increased with the -increase of their wealth; a spirit that, unhappily -meeting with an exercise of power in -England, which, however lawful, is not reconcilable -to any ideas of liberty, much less with -theirs, has kindled this flame, that is ready to -consume us.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_221">221</span> -I do not mean to commend either the spirit -in this excess, or the moral causes which produce -it. Perhaps a more smooth and accommodating -spirit of freedom in them would be -more acceptable to us. Perhaps ideas of liberty -might be desired, more reconcilable with -an arbitrary and boundless authority. Perhaps -we might wish the colonists to be persuaded -that their liberty is more secure when held in -trust for them by us, as guardians during a perpetual -minority, than with any part of it in -their own hands. But the question is not -whether their spirit deserves praise or blame. -What, in the name of God, shall we do with it? -You have before you the object, such as it -is, with all its glories, with all its imperfections -on its head. You see the magnitude, the importance, -the temper, the habits, the disorders. -By all these considerations we are strongly -urged to determine something concerning it. -We are called upon to fix some rule and line -for our future conduct, which may give a little -stability to our politics, and prevent the return -of such unhappy deliberations as the present. -Every such return will bring the matter before -us in a still more untractable form. For, what -astonishing and incredible things have we not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_222">222</span> -seen already? What monsters have not been -generated from this unnatural contention? -While every principle of authority and resistance -has been pushed upon both sides, as -far as it would go, there is nothing so solid -and certain, either in reasoning or in practice, -that it has not been shaken. Until very lately, -all authority in America seemed to be nothing -but an emanation from yours. Even the popular -part of the colony constitution derived all -its activity, and its first vital movement, from -the pleasure of the Crown. We thought, sir, -that the utmost which the discontented colonists -could do, was to disturb authority. We -never dreamed they could of themselves supply -it, knowing in general what an operose business -it is to establish a government absolutely new. -But having, for our purposes in this contention, -resolved that none but an obedient assembly -should sit, the humors of the people there, finding -all passage through the legal channel -stopped, with great violence broke out another -way. Some provinces have tried their experiment, -as we have tried ours; and theirs has -succeeded. They have formed a government -sufficient for its purposes, without the bustle of -a revolution, or the troublesome formality of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_223">223</span> -an election. Evident necessity and tacit consent -have done the business in an instant. So -well they have done it, that Lord Dunmore (the -account is among the fragments on your table) -tells you, that the new institution is infinitely -better obeyed than the ancient government -ever was in its most fortunate periods. Obedience -is what makes government, and not the -names by which it is called; not the name -of governor, as formerly, or committee, as at -present. This new government has originated -directly from the people, and was not transmitted -through any of the ordinary artificial -media of a positive constitution. It was not a -manufacture ready formed, and transmitted to -them in that condition from England. The -evil arising from hence is this: that the colonists -having once found the possibility of enjoying -the advantages of order in the midst of -a struggle for liberty, such struggles will not -henceforward seem so terrible to the settled -and sober part of mankind as they had appeared -before the trial.</p> - -<p>Pursuing the same plan of punishing by the -denial of the exercise of government to still -greater lengths, we wholly abrogated the ancient -government of Massachusetts. We were<span class="pagenum" id="Page_224">224</span> -confident that the first feeling, if not the very -prospect of anarchy, would instantly enforce -a complete submission. The experiment was -tried. A new, strange, unexpected face of -things appeared. Anarchy is found tolerable. -A vast province has now subsisted, and subsisted -in a considerable degree of health and vigor, -for near a twelvemonth, without governor, -without public council, without judges, without -executive magistrates. How long it will continue -in this state, or what may arise out of -this unheard-of situation, how can the wisest of -us conjecture? Our late experience has taught -us, that many of those fundamental principles, -formerly believed infallible, are either not of the -importance they were imagined to be, or that -we have not at all adverted to some other far -more important and far more powerful principles, -which entirely overrule those we had considered -as omnipotent. I am much against any -farther experiments, which tend to put to the -proof any more of these allowed opinions, -which contribute so much to the public tranquillity. -In effect, we suffer as much at home -by this loosening of all ties, and this concussion -of all established opinions, as we do abroad. -For, in order to prove that the Americans have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_225">225</span> -no right to their liberties, we are every day endeavoring -to subvert the maxims which preserve -the whole spirit of our own. To prove -that the Americans ought not to be free, we are -obliged to depreciate the value of freedom itself; -and we never seem to gain a paltry advantage -over them in debate, without attacking -some of those principles, or deriding some of -those feelings, for which our ancestors have -shed their blood.</p> - -<p>But, sir, in wishing to put an end to pernicious -experiments, I do not mean to preclude -the fullest inquiry. Far from it. Far from deciding -on a sudden or partial view, I would patiently -go round and round the subject, and survey -it minutely in every possible aspect. Sir, if -I were capable of engaging you to an equal attention, -I would state that, as far as I am capable -of discerning, there are but three ways of proceeding -relative to this stubborn spirit which -prevails in your colonies and disturbs your government. -These are, to change that spirit, as -inconvenient, by removing the causes; to prosecute -it as criminal; or to comply with it as necessary. -I would not be guilty of an imperfect -enumeration. I can think of but these three. -Another has, indeed, been started—that of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_226">226</span> -giving up the colonies; but it met so slight a -reception, that I do not think myself obliged -to dwell a great while upon it. It is nothing -but a little sally of anger, like the frowardness -of peevish children, who, when they cannot -get all they would have, are resolved to take -nothing.</p> - -<p>The <em>first</em> of these plans, to change the spirit, -as inconvenient, by removing the causes, I -think is the most like a systematic proceeding. -It is radical in its principle, but it is attended -with great difficulties, some of them little short, -as I conceive, of impossibilities. This will -appear by examining into the plans which have -been proposed.</p> - -<p>As the growing population of the colonies is -evidently one cause of their resistance, it was -last session mentioned in both Houses by men of -weight, and received, not without applause, that, -in order to check this evil, it would be proper for -the Crown to make no farther grants of land. -But to this scheme there are two objections. -The first, that there is already so much unsettled -land in private hands as to afford room for an -immense future population, although the Crown -not only withheld its grants, but annihilated -its soil. If this be the case, then the only effect<span class="pagenum" id="Page_227">227</span> -of this avarice of desolation, this hoarding of a -royal wilderness, would be to raise the value of -the possessions in the hands of the great private -monopolists without any adequate check to the -growing and alarming mischief of population.</p> - -<p>But if you stopped your grants, what would -be the consequence? The people would occupy -without grants. They have already so occupied -in many places. You cannot station garrisons -in every part of these deserts. If you -drive the people from one place, they will carry -on their annual tillage, and remove with their -flocks and herds to another. Many of the -people in the back settlements are already little -attached to particular situations. Already they -have topped the Apalachian Mountains.<a id="FNanchor_57" href="#Footnote_57" class="fnanchor">57</a> -From thence they behold before them an immense -plain, one vast, rich, level meadow—a -square of five hundred miles. Over this they -would wander without a possibility of restraint. -They would change their manners with the habits -of their life; would soon forget a government -by which they were disowned; would become -hordes of English Tartars; and, pouring down -upon your unfortified frontiers a fierce and irresistible -cavalry, become masters of your governors -and your counsellors, your collectors and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_228">228</span> -controllers, and of all the slaves that adhered to -them. Such would, and, in no long time, -must be the effect of attempting to forbid as a -crime, and to suppress as an evil, the command -and blessing of Providence, “Increase and -multiply.” Such would be the happy result of -an endeavor to keep as a lair of wild beasts -that earth which God by an express charter -has given to the children of men. Far different, -and surely much wiser, has been our policy -hitherto. Hitherto we have invited our people, -by every kind of bounty, to fixed establishments. -We have invited the husbandman to -look to authority for his title. We have taught -him piously to believe in the mysterious virtue -of wax and parchment. We have thrown each -tract of land, as it was peopled, into districts, -that the ruling power should never be wholly -out of sight. We have settled all we could, -and we have carefully attended every settlement -with government.</p> - -<p>Adhering, sir, as I do, to this policy, as well -as for the reasons I have just given, I think this -new project of hedging in population to be -neither prudent nor practicable.</p> - -<p>To impoverish the colonies in general, and -in particular to arrest the noble course of their<span class="pagenum" id="Page_229">229</span> -marine enterprises, would be a more easy task. -I freely confess it. We have shown a disposition -to a system of this kind; a disposition even -to continue the restraint after the offence, looking -on ourselves as rivals to our colonies, and -persuaded that of course we must gain all that -they shall lose. Much mischief we may -certainly do. The power inadequate to all -other things is often more than sufficient for -this. I do not look on the direct and immediate -power of the colonies to resist our violence -as very formidable. In this, however, I may -be mistaken. But when I consider that we -have colonies for no purpose but to be serviceable -to us, it seems to my poor understanding -a little preposterous to make them unserviceable -in order to keep them obedient. It is, in -truth, nothing more than the old, and, as I -thought, exploded problem of tyranny, which -proposes to beggar its subject into submission. -But, remember, when you have completed your -system of impoverishment, that nature still proceeds -in her ordinary course; that discontent -will increase with misery; and that there are -critical moments in the fortunes of all states, -when they who are too weak to contribute to -your prosperity may be strong enough to complete<span class="pagenum" id="Page_230">230</span> -your ruin. “<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Spoliatis arma supersunt.</i>”</p> - -<p>The temper and character which prevail in -our colonies are, I am afraid, unalterable by any -human art. We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree -of this fierce people, and persuade them -that they are not sprung from a nation in whose -veins the blood of freedom circulates. The language -in which they would hear you tell them -this tale would detect the imposition. Your -speech would betray you. An Englishman is -the unfittest person on earth to argue another -Englishman into slavery.</p> - -<p>I think it is nearly as little in our power to -change their republican religion as their free -descent; or to substitute the Roman Catholic -as a penalty, or the Church of England as an -improvement. The mode of inquisition and -dragooning is going out of fashion in the old -world, and I should not confide much to their -efficacy in the new. The education of the -Americans is also on the same unalterable bottom -with their religion. You cannot persuade -them to burn their books of curious science; to -banish their lawyers from their courts of law; -or to quench the lights of their assemblies, by -refusing to choose those persons who are best -read in their privileges. It would be no less<span class="pagenum" id="Page_231">231</span> -impracticable to think of wholly annihilating -the popular assemblies in which these lawyers -sit. The army, by which we must govern in -their place, would be far more chargeable to us; -not quite so effectual; and perhaps, in the end, -full as difficult to be kept in obedience.</p> - -<p>With regard to the high aristocratic spirit of -Virginia and the southern colonies, it has been -proposed, I know, to reduce it, by declaring a -general enfranchisement of their slaves. This -project has had its advocates and panegyrists, -yet I never could argue myself into an opinion -of it. Slaves are often much attached to their -masters. A general wild offer of liberty would -not always be accepted. History furnishes few -instances of it. It is sometimes as hard to persuade -slaves to be free as it is to compel freemen -to be slaves; and in this auspicious scheme -we should have both these pleasing tasks on -our hands at once. But when we talk of enfranchisement, -do we not perceive that the -American master may enfranchise too, and arm -servile hands in defence of freedom? A measure -to which other people have had recourse -more than once, and not without success, in a -desperate situation of their affairs.</p> - -<p>Slaves as these unfortunate black people are,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_232">232</span> -and dull as all men are from slavery, must they -not a little suspect the offer of freedom from -that very nation which has sold them to their -present masters? From that nation, one of -whose causes of quarrel with those masters is -their refusal to deal any more in that inhuman -traffic? An offer of freedom from England -would come rather oddly, shipped to them in -an African vessel, which is refused an entry into -the ports of Virginia or Carolina, with a cargo -of three hundred Angola negroes. It would be -curious to see the Guinea captain attempt at -the same instant to publish his proclamation of -liberty and to advertise the sale of slaves.</p> - -<p>But let us suppose all these moral difficulties -got over. The ocean remains. You cannot -pump this dry; and as long as it continues in -its present bed, so long all the causes which -weaken authority by distance will continue.</p> - -<div class="poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="iq">“Ye gods! annihilate but space and time,<br /></span> -<span class="i0">And make two lovers happy!”<br /></span> -</div></div> -</div> - -<p class="in0">was a pious and passionate prayer, but just as -reasonable as many of these serious wishes of -very grave and solemn politicians.</p> - -<p>If, then, sir, it seems almost desperate to -think of any alterative course for changing the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_233">233</span> -moral causes (and not quite easy to remove the -natural) which produce the prejudices irreconcilable -to the late exercise of our authority, but -that the spirit infallibly will continue, and, continuing, -will produce such effects as now embarrass -us, the <em>second</em> mode under consideration -is to prosecute that spirit in its overt acts as -<em>criminal</em>.</p> - -<p>At this proposition I must pause a moment. -The thing seems a great deal too big for my -ideas of jurisprudence. It should seem, to my -way of conceiving such matters, that there is a -very wide difference in reason and policy -between the mode of proceeding on the -irregular conduct of scattered individuals, or -even of bands of men, who disturb order within -the state, and the civil dissensions which may, -from time to time, on great questions, agitate -the several communities which compose a great -empire. It looks to me to be narrow and pedantic -to apply the ordinary ideas of criminal -justice so this great public contest. I do not -know the method of drawing up an indictment -against a whole people. I cannot insult and -ridicule the feelings of millions of my fellow-creatures, -as Sir Edward Coke insulted one excellent -individual at the bar.<a id="FNanchor_58" href="#Footnote_58" class="fnanchor">58</a> I am not ripe to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_234">234</span> -pass sentence on the gravest public bodies, intrusted -with magistracies of great authority -and dignity, and charged with the safety of -their fellow-citizens, upon the very same title -that I am. I really think that, for wise men, -this is not judicious; for sober men, not decent; -for minds tinctured with humanity, -not mild and merciful.</p> - -<p>Perhaps, sir, I am mistaken in my idea of -an empire, as distinguished from a single state -or kingdom. But my idea of it is this; that an -empire is the aggregate of many states, under -one common head, whether this head be a -monarch or a presiding republic. It does, -in such constitutions, frequently happen (and -nothing but the dismal, cold, dead uniformity -of servitude can prevent its happening) that -the subordinate parts have many local privileges -and immunities. Between these privileges -and the supreme common authority, the -line may be extremely nice. Of course, disputes—often, -too, very bitter disputes, and -much ill blood, will arise. But, though every -privilege is an exemption, in the case, from the -ordinary exercise of the supreme authority, it -is no denial of it. The claim of a privilege -seems rather, <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">ex vi termini</i>, to imply a superior<span class="pagenum" id="Page_235">235</span> -power; for to talk of the privileges of a state -or of a person who has no superior, is hardly -any better than speaking nonsense. Now, in -such unfortunate quarrels among the component -parts of a great political union of communities, -I can scarcely conceive any thing more -completely imprudent than for the head of the -empire to insist that, if any privilege is pleaded -against his will or his acts, that his <em>whole</em> authority -is denied; instantly to proclaim rebellion, -to beat to arms, and to put the offending provinces -under the ban. Will not this, sir, very -soon teach the provinces to make no distinctions -on their part? Will it not teach them -that the government against which a claim of -liberty is tantamount to high treason, is a government -to which submission is equivalent to -slavery? It may not always be quite convenient -to impress dependent communities -with such an idea.</p> - -<p>We are, indeed, in all disputes with the colonies, -by the necessity of things, the judge. It -is true sir; but I confess that the character of -judge in my own cause is a thing that frightens -me. Instead of filling me with pride, I am exceedingly -humbled by it. I cannot proceed -with a stern, assured, judicial confidence, until<span class="pagenum" id="Page_236">236</span> -I find myself in something more like a judicial -character. I must have these hesitations as -long as I am compelled to recollect that, in my -little reading upon such contests as these, the -sense of mankind has at least as often decided -against the superior as the subordinate power. -Sir, let me add, too, that the opinion of my having -some abstract right in my favor would not -put me much at my ease in passing sentence, unless -I could be sure that there were no rights -which in their exercise under certain circumstances, -were not the most odious of all wrongs, -and the most vexatious of all injustice. Sir, -these considerations have great weight with -me, when I find things so circumstanced that I -see the same party at once a civil litigant -against me in point of right and a culprit before -me; while I sit as criminal judge on acts -of his whose moral quality is to be decided on -upon the merits of that very litigation. Men -are every now and then put, by the complexity -of human affairs, into strange situations; but -justice is the same, let the judge be in what -situation he will.</p> - -<p>There is, sir, also a circumstance which convinces -me that this mode of criminal proceeding -is not, at least in the present stage of our<span class="pagenum" id="Page_237">237</span> -contest, altogether expedient, which is nothing -less than the conduct of those very persons -who have seemed to adopt that mode, by lately -declaring a rebellion in Massachusetts Bay, as -they had formerly addressed to have traitors -brought hither, under an act of Henry the -Eighth, for trial. For, though rebellion is declared, -it is not proceeded against as such; nor -have any steps been taken toward the apprehension -or conviction of any individual offender, -either on our late or our former address; but -modes of <em>public</em> coercion have been adopted, -and such as have much more resemblance to a -sort of qualified hostility toward an independent -power than the punishment of rebellious subjects. -All this seems rather inconsistent; but -it shows how difficult it is to apply these juridical -ideas to our present case.</p> - -<p>In this situation, let us seriously and coolly -ponder. What is it we have got by all our -menaces, which have been many and ferocious? -What advantage have we derived from the -penal laws we have passed, and which, for the -time, have been severe and numerous? What -advances have we made toward our object by -the sending of a force which, by land and sea, -is no contemptible strength? Has the disorder<span class="pagenum" id="Page_238">238</span> -abated? Nothing less. When I see things in -this situation, after such confident hopes, bold -promises, and active exertions, I cannot, for -my life, avoid a suspicion that the plan itself is -not correctly right.</p> - -<p>If, then, the removal of the causes of this -spirit of American liberty be, for the greater -part, or rather entirely, impracticable; if the -ideas of criminal process be inapplicable, or, if -applicable, are in the highest degree inexpedient, -what way yet remains? No way is -open but the third and last—to comply with -the American spirit as necessary, or, if you -please, to submit to it as a necessary evil.</p> - -<p>If we adopt this mode, if we mean to conciliate -and concede, let us see, of what nature the -concessions ought to be. To ascertain the nature -of our concession, we must look at their complaint. -The colonies complain that they have -not the characteristic mark and seal of British -freedom. They complain that they are taxed -in Parliament in which they are not represented. -If you mean to satisfy them at all, -you must satisfy them with regard to this complaint. -If you mean to please any people, you -must give them the boon which they ask; not -what you may think better for them, but of a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_239">239</span> -kind totally different. Such an act may be a -wise regulation, but it is no concession, whereas -our present theme is the mode of giving satisfaction.</p> - -<p>Sir, I think you must perceive that I am -resolved this day to have nothing at all to do -with the question of the right of taxation. -Some gentlemen startle, but it is true. I put -it totally out of the question. It is less than -nothing in my consideration. I do not, indeed, -wonder, nor will you, sir, that gentlemen of -profound learning are fond of displaying it on -this profound subject. But my consideration -is narrow, confined, and wholly limited to the -policy of the question. I do not examine -whether the giving away a man’s money be a -power excepted and reserved out of the general -trust of government, and how far all mankind, -in all forms of polity, are entitled to an exercise -of that right by the charter of nature; or -whether, on the contrary, a right of taxation is -necessarily involved in the general principle of -legislation, and inseparable from the ordinary -supreme power. These are deep questions, -where great names militate against each other; -where reason is perplexed; and an appeal to -authorities only thickens the confusion; for<span class="pagenum" id="Page_240">240</span> -high and reverend authorities lift up their heads -on both sides, and there is no sure footing in -the middle. The point is</p> - -<div class="poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i18">That Serbonian bog<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Betwixt Damieta and Mount Cassius old,<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Where armies whole have sunk.<a id="FNanchor_59" href="#Footnote_59" class="fnanchor">59</a><br /></span> -</div></div> -</div> - -<p class="in0">I do not intend to be overwhelmed in this bog, -though in such respectable company. The -question with me is, not whether you have a -right to render your people miserable, but -whether it is not your interest to make them -happy. It is not what a lawyer tells me I <em>may</em> -do, but what humanity, reason, and justice tell -me I <em>ought</em> to do. Is a politic act the worse for -being a generous one? Is no concession -proper but that which is made from your want -of right to keep what you grant? Or does it -lessen the grace or dignity of relaxing in the -exercise of an odious claim, because you have -your evidence-room full of titles, and your -magazines stuffed with arms to enforce them? -What signify all those titles and all those arms? -Of what avail are they, when the reason of the -thing tells me that the assertion of my title is -the loss of my suit, and that I could do nothing -but wound myself by the use of my own -weapons?<a id="FNanchor_60" href="#Footnote_60" class="fnanchor">60</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_241">241</span> -Such is steadfastly my opinion of the absolute -necessity of keeping up the concord of this -empire by a unity of spirit, though in a diversity -of operations, that, if I were sure the -colonists had, at their leaving this country, -sealed a regular compact of servitude; that -they had solemnly abjured all the rights of -citizens; that they had made a vow to renounce -all ideas of liberty for them and their posterity -to all generations, yet I should hold myself -obliged to conform to the temper I found universally -prevalent in my own day, and to govern -two millions of men, impatient of servitude, on -the principles of freedom. I am not determining -a point of law. I am restoring tranquillity, -and the general character and situation of a -people must determine what sort of government -is fitted for them. That point nothing -else can or ought to determine.</p> - -<p>My idea, therefore, without considering -whether we yield as matter of right, or grant -as matter of favor, is <em>to admit the people of our -colonies into an interest in the Constitution</em>, and, -by recording that admission in the journals of -Parliament, to give them as strong an assurance -as the nature of the thing will admit, that -we mean forever to adhere to that solemn declaration -of systematic indulgence.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_242">242</span> -Some years ago, the repeal of a revenue act, -upon its understood principle, might have -served to show that we intended an unconditional -abatement of the exercise of a taxing -power. Such a measure was then sufficient to -remove all suspicion, and to give perfect -content. But unfortunate events, since that -time, may make something farther necessary, -and not more necessary for the satisfaction of -the colonies, than for the dignity and consistency -of our own future proceedings.</p> - -<p>I have taken a very incorrect measure of the -disposition of the House, if this proposal in itself -would be received with dislike. I think, -sir, we have few American financiers. But our -misfortune is, we are too acute; we are too exquisite -in our conjectures of the future, for men -oppressed with such great and present evils. -The more moderate among the opposers of -parliamentary concessions freely confess that -they hope no good from taxation, but they apprehend -the colonists have farther views, and, if -this point were conceded, they would instantly -attack the Trade Laws. These gentlemen are -convinced that this was the intention from the -beginning, and the quarrel of the Americans -with taxation was no more than a cloak and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_243">243</span> -cover to this design. Such has been the language -even of a gentleman [Mr. Rice] of real -moderation, and of a natural temper well adjusted -to fair and equal government. I am, -however, sir, not a little surprised at this kind -of discourse, whenever I hear it; and I am the -more surprised, on account of the arguments -which I constantly find in company with it, and -which are often urged from the same mouths -and on the same day.</p> - -<p>For instance, when we allege that it is against -reason to tax a people under so many restraints -in trade as the Americans, the noble lord in -the blue ribbon shall tell you that the restraints -on trade are futile and useless; of no advantage -to us, and of no burden to those on whom -they are imposed; that the trade of America is -not secured by the acts of navigation, but by -the natural and irresistible advantage of a commercial -preference.</p> - -<p>Such is the merit of the trade laws in this -posture of the debate. But when strong internal -circumstances are urged against the -taxes; when the scheme is dissected; when -experience and the nature of things are brought -to prove, and do prove, the utter impossibility -of obtaining an effective revenue from the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_244">244</span> -colonies; when these things are pressed, or -rather press themselves, so as to drive the advocates -of colony taxes to a clear admission of -the futility of the scheme; then, sir, the sleeping -trade laws revive from their trance, and this -useless taxation is to be kept sacred, not for its -own sake, but as a counterguard and security -of the laws of trade.</p> - -<p>Then, sir, you keep up revenue laws which -are mischievous, in order to preserve trade laws -that are useless. Such is the wisdom of our -plan in both its members. They are separately -given up as of no value, and yet one is always -to be defended for the sake of the other. But I -cannot agree with the noble lord, nor with -the pamphlet from whence he seems to have -borrowed these ideas, concerning the inutility -of the trade laws<a id="FNanchor_61" href="#Footnote_61" class="fnanchor">61</a>; for, without idolizing them, -I am sure they are still, in many ways, of great -use to us; and in former times, they have been -of the greatest. They do confine, and they do -greatly narrow the market for the Americans; -but my perfect conviction of this does not help -me in the least to discern how the revenue laws -form any security whatsoever to the commercial -regulations, or that these commercial -regulations are the true ground of the quarrel,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_245">245</span> -or that the giving way in any one instance of -authority is to lose all that may remain unconceded.</p> - -<p>One fact is clear and indisputable. The public -and avowed origin of this quarrel was on -taxation. This quarrel has, indeed, brought on -new disputes on new questions, but certainly -the least bitter, and the fewest of all, on the -trade laws. To judge which of the two be the -real radical cause of quarrel, we have to see -whether the commercial dispute did, in order -of time, precede the dispute on taxation. There -is not a shadow of evidence for it. Next, to -enable us to judge whether at this moment a -dislike to the trade laws be the real cause of -quarrel, it is absolutely necessary to put the -taxes out of the question by a repeal. See how -the Americans act in this position, and then -you will be able to discern correctly what is the -true object of the controversy, or whether any -controversy at all will remain. Unless you -consent to remove this cause of difference, it is -impossible, with decency, to assert that the dispute -is not upon what it is avowed to be. And -I would, sir, recommend to your serious consideration, -whether it be prudent to form a rule for -punishing people, not on their own acts, but on<span class="pagenum" id="Page_246">246</span> -your conjectures. Surely it is preposterous at -the very best. It is not justifying your anger -by their misconduct, but it is converting your -ill will into their delinquency.</p> - -<p>But the colonies will go farther. Alas! alas! -when will this speculating against fact and reason -end? What will quiet these panic fears -which we entertain of the hostile effect of a -conciliatory conduct? Is it true that no case -can exist in which it is proper for the sovereign -to accede to the desires of his discontented subjects? -Is there any thing peculiar in this case -to make a rule for itself? Is all authority of -course lost, when it is not pushed to the extreme? -Is it a certain maxim, that the fewer -causes of dissatisfaction are left by government -the more the subject will be inclined to resist -and rebel?</p> - -<p>All these objections being, in fact, no more -than suspicions, conjectures, divinations, formed -in defiance of fact and experience, they did not, -sir, discourage me from entertaining the idea of -a conciliatory concession, founded on the principles -which I have just stated.</p> - -<p>In forming a plan for this purpose, I endeavored -to put myself in that frame of mind which -was the most natural and the most reasonable,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_247">247</span> -and which was certainly the most probable -means of securing me from all error. I set out -with a perfect distrust of my own abilities; a -total renunciation of every speculation of my -own; and with a profound reverence for the -wisdom of our ancestors, who have left us the -inheritance of so happy a constitution and so -flourishing an empire, and, what is a thousand -times more valuable, the treasury of the maxims -and principles which formed the one and obtained -the other.</p> - -<p>During the reigns of the Kings of Spain of the -Austrian family, whenever they were at a loss -in the Spanish councils, it was common for their -statesmen to say, that they ought to consult -the genius of Philip the Second. The genius -of Philip the Second might mislead them; and -the issue of their affairs showed that they had -not chosen the most perfect standard. But, -sir, I am sure that I shall not be misled, when, -in a case of constitutional difficulty, I consult -the genius of the English Constitution. Consulting -at that oracle (it was with all due humility -and piety), I found four capital examples -in a similar case before me: those of Ireland, -Wales, Chester, and Durham.</p> - -<p>Ireland, before the English conquest, though<span class="pagenum" id="Page_248">248</span> -never governed by a despotic power, had no -Parliament. How far the English Parliament -itself was at that time modelled according to the -present form, is disputed among antiquarians. -But we have all the reason in the world to be -assured, that a form of Parliament, such as -England then enjoyed, she instantly communicated -to Ireland; and we are equally sure that -almost every successive improvement in constitutional -liberty, as fast as it was made here, -was transmitted thither. The feudal baronage -and the feudal knighthood, the roots of our -primitive constitution, were early transplanted -into that soil, and grew and flourished there. -Magna Charta, if it did not give us originally -the House of Commons, gave us, at least, a -House of Commons of weight and consequence. -But your ancestors did not churlishly sit down -alone to the feast of Magna Charta. Ireland -was made immediately a partaker. This benefit -of English laws and liberties, I confess, was -not at first extended to <em>all</em> Ireland. Mark the -consequence. English authority and English -liberty had exactly the same boundaries. Your -standard could never be advanced an inch before -your privileges.<a id="FNanchor_62" href="#Footnote_62" class="fnanchor">62</a> Sir John Davis shows -beyond a doubt, that the refusal of a general<span class="pagenum" id="Page_249">249</span> -communication of these rights was the true -cause why Ireland was five hundred years in -subduing; and after the vain projects of a military -government, attempted in the reign of -Queen Elizabeth, it was soon discovered that -nothing could make that country English, in -civility and allegiance, but your laws and your -forms of legislature.<a id="FNanchor_63" href="#Footnote_63" class="fnanchor">63</a> It was not English arms, -but the English Constitution, that conquered -Ireland. From that time, Ireland has ever had -a general Parliament, as she had before a partial -Parliament. You changed the people; you -altered the religion; but you never touched the -form or the vital substance of free government -in that kingdom. You deposed kings; you -restored them; you altered the succession to -theirs, as well as to your own crown: but you -never altered their Constitution; the principle -of which was respected by usurpation; restored -with the restoration of monarchy, and established, -I trust, forever, by the glorious revolution. -This has made Ireland the great and -flourishing kingdom that it is; and from a disgrace -and a burden intolerable to this nation, -has rendered her a principal part of our strength -and ornament. This country cannot be said -to have ever formally taxed her. The irregular<span class="pagenum" id="Page_250">250</span> -things done in the confusion of mighty troubles, -and on the hinge of great revolutions, even if -all were done that is said to have been done, -form no example. If they have any effect in -argument, they make an exception to prove the -rule. None of your own liberties could stand -a moment if the casual deviations from them, -at such times, were suffered to be used as proofs -of their nullity. By the lucrative amount of -such casual breaches in the Constitution, judge -what the stated and fixed rule of supply has -been in that kingdom. Your Irish pensioners -would starve, if they had no other fund to live -on than taxes granted by English authority. -Turn your eyes to those popular grants from -whence all your great supplies are come, and -learn to respect that only source of public -wealth in the British empire.</p> - -<p>My next example is Wales. This country -was said to be reduced by Henry the Third. -It was said more truly to be so by Edward the -First.<a id="FNanchor_64" href="#Footnote_64" class="fnanchor">64</a> But though then conquered, it was not -looked upon as any part of the realm of England. -Its old Constitution, whatever that might -have been, was destroyed, and no good one -was substituted in its place. The care of that -tract was put into the hands of Lords Marchers—a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_251">251</span> -form of government of a very singular -kind; a strange heterogeneous monster, something -between hostility and government; perhaps -it has a sort of resemblance, according -to the modes of those times, to that of commander-in-chief -at present, to whom all civil -power is granted as secondary. The manners -of the Welsh nation followed the genius of -the government. The people were ferocious, -restive, savage, and uncultivated; sometimes -composed, never pacified. Wales, within itself, -was in perpetual disorder; and it kept the frontier -of England in perpetual alarm. Benefits -from it to the State there were none. Wales -was only known to England by incursion and -invasion.</p> - -<p>Sir, during that state of things, Parliament -was not idle. They attempted to subdue the -fierce spirit of the Welsh by all sorts of rigorous -laws. They prohibited by statute the -sending all sorts of arms into Wales, as you -prohibit by proclamation (with something more -of doubt on the legality) the sending arms to -America. They disarmed the Welsh by statute, -as you attempted (but still with more question -on the legality) to disarm New England by an -instruction. They made an act to drag offenders<span class="pagenum" id="Page_252">252</span> -from Wales into England for trial, as you -have done (but with more hardship) with regard -to America. By another act, where one -of the parties was an Englishman, they ordained -that his trial should be always by English. -They made acts to restrain trade, as you do; -and they prevented the Welsh from the use of -fairs and markets, as you do the Americans -from fisheries and foreign ports. In short, -when the statute-book was not quite so much -swelled as it is now, you find no less than fifteen -acts of penal regulation on the subject of -Wales.<a id="FNanchor_65" href="#Footnote_65" class="fnanchor">65</a></p> - -<p>Here we rub our hands—a fine body of precedents -for the authority of Parliament and the -use of it—I admit it fully; and pray add likewise -to these precedents, that all the while -Wales rid this kingdom like an <em>incubus</em>; that it -was an unprofitable and oppressive burden; -and that an Englishman travelling in that country -could not go six yards from the highroad -without being murdered.</p> - -<p>The march of the human mind is slow. Sir, -it was not until after two hundred years discovered -that, by an eternal law, Providence had decreed -vexation to violence, and poverty to rapine. -Your ancestors did, however, at length<span class="pagenum" id="Page_253">253</span> -open their eyes to the ill husbandry of injustice. -They found that the tyranny of a free people -could of all tyrannies the least be endured, and -that laws made against a whole nation were not -the most effectual methods for securing its -obedience. Accordingly, in the twenty-seventh -year of Henry VIII., the course was entirely -altered. With a preamble stating the entire -and perfect rights of the Crown of England, it -gave to the Welsh all the rights and privileges -of English subjects. A political order was established; -the military power gave way to the -civil; the marches were turned into counties. -But that a nation should have a right to English -liberties, and yet no share at all in the fundamental -security of these liberties, the grant -of their own property, seemed a thing so incongruous, -that, eight years after, that is, in the -thirty-fifth of that reign, a complete and not -ill-proportioned representation by counties and -boroughs was bestowed upon Wales by act of -Parliament. From that moment, as by a charm, -the tumults subsided; obedience was restored; -peace, order, and civilization followed in the -train of liberty. When the day-star of the -English Constitution had arisen in their hearts, -all was harmony within and without.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_254">254</span></p> - -<div class="poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i2">Simul alba nautis<br /></span> -<span class="i2">Stella refulsit,<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Defluit saxis agitatus humor:<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Concidunt venti, fugiuntque nubes;<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Et minax (quod sic voluere) ponto<br /></span> -<span class="i2">Unda recumbit.<a id="FNanchor_66" href="#Footnote_66" class="fnanchor">66</a><br /></span> -</div></div> -</div> - -<p>The very same year the county palatine of -Chester received the same relief from its oppressions -and the same remedy to its disorders. -Before this time Chester was little less distempered -than Wales. The inhabitants, without -rights themselves, were the fittest to destroy -the rights of others; and from thence Richard -II. drew the standing army of archers with -which for a time he oppressed England. The -people of Chester applied to Parliament in a -petition penned as I shall read to you:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“To the King our sovereign lord, in most humble wise -shown unto your excellent Majesty, the inhabitants of your -Grace’s county palatine of Chester; that where the said county -palatine of Chester is and hath been always hitherto exempt, excluded -and separated out and from your high court of Parliament, -to have any knights and burgesses within the said court; -by reason whereof the said inhabitants have hitherto sustained -manifold disherisons, losses, and damages, as well in their -lands, goods, and bodies, as in the good, civil, and politic governance -and maintenance of the Commonwealth of their said -country. (2) And, forasmuch as the said inhabitants have -always hitherto been bound by the acts and statutes made and -ordained by your said highness and your most noble progenitors,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_255">255</span> -by authority of the said court, as far forth as other counties, -cities, and boroughs have been, that have had their knights and -burgesses within your said court of Parliament, and yet have -had neither knight nor burgess there for the said county palatine; -the said inhabitants, for lack thereof, have been oftentimes -touched and grieved with acts and statutes made within -the said court, as well derogatory unto the most ancient jurisdictions, -liberties, and privileges of your said county palatine, -as prejudicial unto the Commonwealth, quietness, rest, and -peace of your Grace’s most bounden subjects inhabiting within -the same.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>What did Parliament with this audacious address? -Reject it as a libel? Treat it as an -affront to government? Spurn it as a derogation -from the rights of legislature? Did they -toss it over the table? Did they burn it by -the hands of the common hangman? They -took the petition of grievance, all rugged as it -was, without softening or temperament, unpurged -of the original bitterness and indignation -of complaint; they made it the very preamble -to their act of redress, and consecrated -its principle to all ages in the sanctuary of legislation.</p> - -<p>Here is my third example. It was attended -with the success of the two former. Chester, -civilized as well as Wales, has demonstrated -that freedom, and not servitude, is the cure of -anarchy, as religion, and not atheism, is the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_256">256</span> -true remedy for superstition. Sir, this pattern -of Chester was followed in the reign of Charles -II. with regard to the county palatine of Durham, -which is my fourth example. This county -had long lain out of the pale of free legislation. -So scrupulously was the example of Chester followed, -that the style of the preamble is nearly -the same with that of the Chester act; and -without affecting the abstract extent of the -authority of Parliament, it recognizes the equity -of not suffering any considerable district in -which the British subjects may act as a body -to be taxed without their own voice in the -grant.</p> - -<p>Now, if the doctrines of policy contained in -these preambles, and the force of these examples -in the acts of Parliament, avail anything, -what can be said against applying them with -regard to America? Are not the people of -America as much Englishmen as the Welsh? -The preamble of the act of Henry VIII. says, -the Welsh speak a language no way resembling -that of his Majesty’s English subjects. Are the -Americans not as numerous? If we may trust -the learned and accurate Judge Barrington’s -account of North Wales, and take that as a -standard to measure the rest, there is no comparison.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_257">257</span> -The people cannot amount to above -200,000; not a tenth part of the number in the -colonies. Is America in rebellion? Wales was -hardly ever free from it. Have you attempted -to govern America by penal statutes? You -made fifteen for Wales. But your legislative -authority is perfect with regard to America. -Was it less perfect in Wales, Chester, and Durham! -But America is virtually represented. -What! does the electric force of virtual representation -more easily pass over the Atlantic -than pervade Wales, which lies in your neighborhood; -or than Chester and Durham, surrounded -by abundance of representation that is -actual and palpable? But, sir, your ancestors -thought this sort of virtual representation, however -ample, to be totally insufficient for the -freedom of the inhabitants of territories that -are so near, and comparatively so inconsiderable. -How, then, can I think it sufficient for those -which are infinitely greater and infinitely more -remote?</p> - -<p>You will now, sir, perhaps imagine that I am -on the point of proposing to you a scheme for -representation of the colonies in Parliament. -Perhaps I might be inclined to entertain some -such thought, but a great flood stops me in my<span class="pagenum" id="Page_258">258</span> -course. <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Opposuit natura.</i> I cannot remove -the eternal barriers of the creation. The thing -in that mode I do not know to be possible. As -I meddle with no theory, I do not absolutely -assert the impracticability of such a representation; -but I do not see my way to it; and those -who have been more confident have not been -more successful. However, the arm of public -benevolence is not shortened, and there are -often several means to the same end. What -nature has disjoined in one way wisdom may -unite in another. When we cannot give the -benefit as we would wish, let us not refuse it -altogether. If we cannot give the principal, -let us find a substitute. But how? Where? -What substitute?</p> - -<p>Fortunately I am not obliged for the ways -and means of this substitute to tax my own -unproductive invention. I am not even obliged -to go to the rich treasury of the fertile framers -of imaginary commonwealths; not to the Republic -of Plato, not to the Utopia of More, not -to the Oceana of Harrington. It is before me. -It is at my feet.</p> - -<div class="poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i20">And the dull swain<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Treads daily on it with his clouted shoon.<a id="FNanchor_67" href="#Footnote_67" class="fnanchor">67</a><br /></span> -</div></div> -</div> - -<p class="in0">I only wish you to recognize, for the theory, the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_259">259</span> -ancient constitutional policy of this kingdom -with regard to representation, as that policy has -been declared in acts of Parliament; and, as to -the practice, to return to that mode which a uniform -experience has marked out to you as best, -and in which you walked with security, advantage, -and honor, until the year 1763.</p> - -<p>My resolutions, therefore, mean to establish -the equity and justice of a taxation of America, -by <em>grant</em> and not by <em>imposition</em>. To mark the -<em>legal competency</em> of the colony assemblies for -the support of their government in peace, and -for public aids in time of war. To acknowledge -that this legal competency has had <em>a dutiful -and beneficial exercise</em>; and that experience -has shown the <em>benefit of their grants</em>, and the -<em>futility of parliamentary taxation as a method of -supply</em>.</p> - -<p>These solid truths compose six fundamental -propositions. There are three more resolutions -corollary to these. If you admit the first set, -you can hardly reject the others. But if you -admit the first, I shall be far from solicitous -whether you accept or refuse the last. I think -these six massive pillars will be of strength -sufficient to support the temple of British concord. -I have no more doubt than I entertain<span class="pagenum" id="Page_260">260</span> -of my existence, that, if you admitted these, -you would command an immediate peace; and, -with but tolerable future management, a lasting -obedience in America. I am not arrogant in -this confident assurance. The propositions are -all mere matters of fact; and if they are such -facts as draw irresistible conclusions even in the -stating, this is the power of truth, and not any -management of mine.</p> - -<p>Sir, I shall open the whole plan to you -together, with such observations on the motions -as may tend to illustrate them where they may -want explanation. The first is a resolution:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“That the colonies and plantations of Great Britain in -North America, consisting of fourteen separate governments, -and containing two millions and upward of free inhabitants, -have not had the liberty and privilege of electing and sending -any knights and burgesses or others to represent them in the -high court of Parliament.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>This is a plain matter of fact, necessary to be -laid down, and (excepting the description) it is -laid down in the language of the Constitution: -it is taken nearly <em>verbatim</em> from acts of Parliament.</p> - -<p>The second is like unto the first:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“That the said colonies and plantations have been liable -to and bounden by several subsidies, payments, rates, and taxes,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_261">261</span> -given and granted by Parliament, though the said colonies and -plantations have not their knights and burgesses in the said -high court of Parliament, of their own election, to represent -the condition of their country; by lack whereof they have -been oftentimes touched and grieved by subsidies given, -granted, and assented to, in said court, in a manner prejudicial -to the commonwealth, quietness, rest, and peace of the subjects -inhabiting within the same.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>Is this description too hot or too cold, too -strong or too weak? Does it arrogate too -much to the supreme Legislature? Does it -lean too much to the claims of the people? If -it runs into any of these errors, the fault is not -mine. It is the language of your own ancient -acts of Parliament.</p> - -<div class="poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">Nec meus hic sermo est sed quæ præcipit Ofellus<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Rusticus, abnormis sapiens.<a id="FNanchor_68" href="#Footnote_68" class="fnanchor">68</a><br /></span> -</div></div> -</div> - -<p>It is the genuine produce of the ancient, rustic, -manly, home-bred sense of this country. I did -not dare to rub off a particle of the venerable -rust that rather adorns and preserves, than destroys -the metal. It would be a profanation to -touch with a tool the stones which construct -the sacred altar of peace.<a id="FNanchor_69" href="#Footnote_69" class="fnanchor">69</a> I would not violate -with modern polish the ingenuous and noble -roughness of these truly constitutional materials. -Above all things, I was resolved not to be guilty -of tampering, the odious vice of restless and unstable<span class="pagenum" id="Page_262">262</span> -minds. I put my foot in the tracks of our -forefathers, where I can neither wander nor -stumble. Determining to fix articles of peace, -I was resolved not to be wise beyond what was -written; I was resolved to use nothing else than -the form of sound words, to let others abound -in their own sense, and carefully to abstain -from all expressions of my own. What the law -has said, I say. In all things else I am silent. -I have no organ but for her words. This, if it -be not ingenious, I am sure, is safe.</p> - -<p>There are, indeed, words expressive of grievance -in this second resolution, which those who -are resolved always to be in the right will deny -to contain matter of fact, as applied to the present -case, although Parliament thought them true -with regard to the counties of Chester and Durham. -They will deny that the Americans were -ever “touched and grieved” with the taxes. If -they considered nothing in taxes but their weight -as pecuniary impositions, there might be some -pretence for this denial. But men may be sorely -touched and deeply grieved in their privileges as -well as in their purses. Men may lose little in -property by the act which takes away all their -freedom. When a man is robbed of a trifle on -the highway, it is not the twopence lost that constitutes<span class="pagenum" id="Page_263">263</span> -the capital outrage. This is not confined -to privileges. Even ancient indulgences -withdrawn, without offence on the part of those -who enjoy such favors, operate as grievances. -But were the Americans then not touched and -grieved by the taxes, in some measure merely -as taxes? If so, why were they almost all either -wholly repealed or exceedingly reduced? Were -they not touched and grieved, even by the regulating -duties of the sixth of George II.? Else -why were the duties first reduced to one third -in 1764, and afterward to a third of that third -in the year 1766? Were they not touched and -grieved by the Stamp Act? I shall say they -were, until that tax is revived. Were they not -touched and grieved by the duties of 1767, which -were likewise repealed, and which Lord Hillsborough -tells you, for the ministry, were laid contrary -to the true principle of commerce? Is not -the assurance given by that noble person to the -colonies of a resolution to lay no more taxes on -them, an admission that taxes would touch and -grieve them? Is not the resolution of the noble -lord in the blue ribbon, now standing on your -journals, the strongest of all proofs that Parliamentary -subsidies really touched and grieved -them? Else why all these changes, modifications, -repeals, assurances, and resolutions?</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_264">264</span> -The next proposition is:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“That, from the distance of the said colonies, and from -other circumstances, no method hath hitherto been devised for -procuring a representation in Parliament for the said colonies.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>This is an assertion of a fact. I go no farther -on the paper; though in my private judgment, a -useful representation is impossible; I am sure -it is not desired by them, nor ought it, perhaps, -by us, but I abstain from opinions.</p> - -<p>The fourth resolution is:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“That each of the said colonies hath within itself a body -chosen in part or in the whole, by the freemen, freeholders, -or other free inhabitance thereof, commonly called the General -Assembly, or General Court, with powers legally to raise, levy, -and assess, according to the several usages of such colonies, -duties and taxes toward the defraying all sorts of public services.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>This competence in the colony assemblies is -certain. It is proved by the whole tenor of their -acts of supply in all the assemblies, in which the -constant style of granting is, “an aid to his Majesty”; -and acts granting to the Crown have regularly -for near a century passed the public offices -without dispute. Those who have been pleased -paradoxically to deny this right, holding that -none but the British Parliament can grant to the -Crown, are wished to look to what is done, not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_265">265</span> -only in the colonies, but in Ireland, in one uniform, -unbroken tenor every session.<a id="FNanchor_70" href="#Footnote_70" class="fnanchor">70</a></p> - -<p>Sir, I am surprised that this doctrine should -come from some of the law servants of the -Crown. I say that if the Crown could be responsible, -his Majesty—but certainly the ministers, -and even these law officers themselves, -through whose hands the acts pass biennially -in Ireland, or annually the colonies, are in a -habitual course of committing impeachable -offences. What habitual offenders have been all -presidents of the council, all secretaries of state, -all first lords of trade, all attorneys, and all solicitors-general! -However, they are safe, as no -one impeaches them; and there is no ground -of charge against them, except in their own -unfounded theories.</p> - -<p>The fifth resolution is also a resolution of -fact:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“That the said General Assemblies, General Courts, or -other bodies legally qualified as aforesaid, have at sundry -times freely granted several large subsidies and public aids for -his Majesty’s service, according to their abilities, when required -thereto by letter from one of his Majesty’s principal -secretaries of State. And that their right to grant the same, -and their cheerfulness and sufficiency in the said grants, have -been at sundry times acknowledged by Parliament.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>To say nothing of their great expenses in the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_266">266</span> -Indian wars; and not to take their exertion in -foreign ones, so high as the supplies in the year -1695, not to go back to their public contributions -in the year 1710, I shall begin to travel -only where the journals give me light; resolving -to deal in nothing but fact authenticated -by parliamentary record, and to build myself -wholly on that solid basis.</p> - -<p>On the 4th of April, 1748, a committee of -this House came to the following resolution:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“<i>Resolved</i>, That it is the opinion of this committee, <em>that it -is just and reasonable</em> that the several provinces and colonies of -Massachusetts Bay, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode -Island, be reimbursed the expenses they have been at in taking -and securing to the Crown of Great Britain the Island of Cape -Breton and its dependencies.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>These expenses were immense for such colonies. -They were above £200,000 sterling; -money first raised and advanced on their public -credit.</p> - -<p>On the 28th of January, 1756, a message from -the King came to us to this effect:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“His Majesty being sensible of the zeal and vigor with -which his faithful subjects of certain colonies in North America -have exerted themselves in defence of his Majesty’s just -rights and possessions, recommends it to this House to take -the same into their consideration, and to enable his Majesty to -give them such assistance as may be a <em>proper reward and encouragement</em>.”</p></blockquote> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_267">267</span> -On the 3d of February, 1756, the House came -to a suitable resolution, expressed in words -nearly the same as those of the message; but -with the farther addition, that the money then -voted was an <em>encouragement</em> to the colonies to -exert themselves with vigor. It will not be -necessary to go through all the testimonies -which your own records have given to the truth -of my resolutions. I will only refer you to the -places in the journals: Vol. xxvii., 16th and -19th May, 1757; vol. xxviii., June 1st, 1758—April -26th and 30th, 1759—March 26th and -31st, and April 28th, 1760—January 9th and -20th, 1761; vol. xxix., January 22d and 26th, -1762—March 14th and 17th, 1763.</p> - -<p>Sir, here is the repeated acknowledgment of -Parliament, that the colonies not only gave, but -gave to satiety. This nation has formally acknowledged -two things: first, that the colonies -had gone beyond their abilities, Parliament having -thought it necessary to reimburse them; secondly, -that they had acted legally and laudably in -their grants of money, and their maintenance of -troops, since the compensation is expressly given -as reward and encouragement. Reward is not -bestowed for acts that are unlawful; and encouragement -is not held out to things that deserve<span class="pagenum" id="Page_268">268</span> -reprehension. My resolution, therefore, -does nothing more than collect into one proposition -what is scattered through your journals. -I give you nothing but your own, and you cannot -refuse in the gross what you have so often -acknowledged in detail. The admission of this, -which will be so honorable to them and to you, -will, indeed, be mortal to all the miserable -stories by which the passions of the misguided -people have been engaged in an unhappy system. -The people heard, indeed, from the beginning -of these disputes, one thing continually -dinned in their ears, that reason and justice demanded -that the Americans, who paid no taxes, -should be compelled to contribute. How did -that fact of their paying nothing stand when -the taxing system began? When Mr. Grenville -began to form his system of American -revenue, he stated in this House that the colonies -were then in debt two million six hundred -thousand pounds sterling money, and was -of opinion they would discharge that debt in -four years. On this state, those untaxed people -were actually subject to the payment of taxes -to the amount of six hundred and fifty thousand -a year. In fact, however, Mr. Grenville was -mistaken. The funds given for sinking the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_269">269</span> -debt did not prove quite so ample as both the -colonies and he expected. The calculation was -too sanguine: the reduction was not completed -till some years after, and at different times in -different colonies. However, the taxes after -the war continued too great to bear any addition, -with prudence or propriety; and when -the burdens imposed in consequence of former -requisitions were discharged, our tone became -too high to resort again to requisition. No -colony, since that time, ever has had any requisition -whatsoever made to it.</p> - -<p>We see the sense of the Crown, and the -sense of Parliament, on the productive nature -of a <em>revenue by grant</em>. Now search the same -journals for the produce of the <em>revenue by imposition</em>. -Where is it? Let us know the volume -and the page. What is the gross, what is the -net produce? To what service is it applied? -How have you appropriated its surplus? What, -can none of the many skilful index-makers that -we are now employing, find any trace of it? -Well, let them and that rest together. But, -are the journals, which say nothing of the revenue, -as silent on the discontent? Oh, no! a -child may find it. It is the melancholy burden -and blot of every page.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_270">270</span> -I think, then, I am, from those journals, -justified in the sixth and last resolution, -which is:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“That it hath been found by experience that the manner of -granting the said supplies and aids, by the said general assemblies, -hath been more agreeable to the said colonies, and more -beneficial and conducive to the public service, than the mode -of giving and granting aids in Parliament, to be raised and -paid in the said colonies.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>This makes the whole of the fundamental -part of the plan. The conclusion is irresistible. -You cannot say that you were driven by -any necessity to an exercise of the utmost -rights of legislature. You cannot assert that -you took on yourselves the task of imposing -colony taxes, from the want of another legal -body, that is competent to the purpose of supplying -the exigencies of the State without -wounding the prejudices of the people. Neither -is it true that the body so qualified, and having -that competence, had neglected the duty.</p> - -<p>The question now on all this accumulated -matter, is—whether you will choose to abide by -a profitable experience, or a mischievous theory; -whether you choose to build on imagination or -fact; whether you prefer enjoyment or hope; -satisfaction in your subjects or discontent?</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_271">271</span> -If these propositions are accepted, every -thing which has been made to enforce a contrary -system must, I take it for granted, fall -along with it. On that ground I have drawn -the following resolution, which, when it comes -to be moved, will naturally be divided in a -proper manner:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“That it may be proper to repeal an act, made in the -seventh year of the reign of his present Majesty, entitled An -Act for granting certain duties in the British colonies and plantations -in America; for allowing a drawback of the duties of -customs upon the exportation from this kingdom of coffee and -cocoa-nuts of the produce of the said colonies or plantations; -for discontinuing the drawbacks payable on China earthenware -exported to America, and for more effectually preventing -the clandestine running of goods in the said colonies and -plantations; and that it may be proper to repeal an act, made -in the fourteenth year of the reign of his present Majesty, entitled, -An Act to discontinue, in such manner, and for such -time as are therein mentioned, the landing and discharging, -lading, or shipping, of goods, wares, and merchandise, at the -town and within the harbor of Boston, in the province of -Massachusetts Bay, in North America; and that it may be -proper to repeal an act, made in the fourteenth year of the -reign of his present Majesty, entitled, An Act for the impartial -administration of justice in the cases of persons questioned -for any acts done by them in the execution of the law, or for -the suppression of riots and tumults in the province of Massachusetts -Bay, in New England; and that it may be proper to -repeal an act, made in the fourteenth year of the reign of his -present Majesty, entitled, An Act for the better regulating the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_272">272</span> -government of the province of Massachusetts Bay, in New -England; and also, that it may be proper to explain and -amend an act, made in the thirty-fifth year of the reign of -King Henry the Eighth, entitled, An Act for the trial of treasons -committed out of the King’s dominions.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>I wish, sir, to repeal the Boston Port Bill, because -(independently of the dangerous precedent -of suspending the rights of the subject -during the King’s pleasure) it was passed, as I -apprehend, with less regularity, and on more -partial principles, than it ought. The corporation -of Boston was not heard before it was condemned. -Other towns, full as guilty as she was, -have not had their ports blocked up. Even the -restraining bill of the present session does not -go to the length of the Boston Port Act. The -same ideas of prudence which induced you not -to extend equal punishment to equal guilt, -even when you were punishing, induce me, who -mean not to chastise, but to reconcile, to be satisfied -with the punishment already partially inflicted.</p> - -<p>Ideas of prudence, and accommodation to -circumstances, prevent you from taking away -the charters of Connecticut and Rhode Island, -as you have taken away that of Massachusetts -Colony, though the Crown has far less power -in the two former provinces than it enjoyed in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_273">273</span> -the latter; and though the abuses have been full -as great and as flagrant in the exempted as in the -punished. The same reasons of prudence and -accommodation have weight with me in restoring -the charter of Massachusetts Bay. Besides, -sir, the act which changes the charter of Massachusetts -is in many particulars so exceptionable, -that if I did not wish absolutely to repeal, I -would by all means desire to alter it, as several -of its provisions tend to the subversion of all -public and private justice. Such, among others, -is the power in the Governor to change the -Sheriff at his pleasure, and to make a new returning -officer for every special cause. It is -shameful to behold such a regulation standing -among English laws.</p> - -<p>The act for bringing persons accused of committing -murder under the orders of government -to England for trial, is but temporary. That -act has calculated the probable duration of our -quarrel with the colonies, and is accommodated -to that supposed duration. I would hasten the -happy moment of reconciliation, and therefore -must, on my principle, get rid of that most -justly obnoxious act.</p> - -<p>The act of Henry the Eighth, for the trial of -treasons, I do not mean to take away, but to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_274">274</span> -confine it to its proper bounds and original intention; -to make it expressly for trial of -treasons (and the greatest treasons may be -committed) in places where the jurisdiction of -the Crown does not extend.</p> - -<p>Having guarded the privileges of local legislature, -I would next secure to the colonies -a fair and unbiased judicature; for which purpose, -sir, I propose the following resolution:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“That, from the time when the General Assembly or General -Court of any colony or plantation in North America, shall -have appointed by act of assembly, duly confirmed, a settled -salary to the offices of the Chief Justice and other judges -of the Superior Court, it may be proper that the said Chief -Justice and other judges of the Superior Courts of such colony, -shall hold his and their office and offices during their good -behavior, and shall not be removed therefrom, but when the -said removal shall be adjudged by his Majesty in council, -upon a hearing on complaint from the General Assembly, -or on a complaint from the Governor, or Council, or the -House of Representatives severally, of the colony in which -the said Chief Justice and other judges have exercised the -said offices.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>The next resolution relates to the Courts of -Admiralty. It is this:</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>“That it may be proper to regulate the Courts of Admiralty, -or Vice Admiralty, authorized by the 15th chapter of the 4th -of George the Third, in such a manner as to make the same -more commodious to those who sue, or are sued, in the said<span class="pagenum" id="Page_275">275</span> -courts, and to provide for the more decent maintenance of the -judges in the same.”</p></blockquote> - -<p>These courts I do not wish to take away. -They are in themselves proper establishments. -This court is one of the capital securities of the -Act of Navigation. The extent of its jurisdiction, -indeed, has been increased; but this is -altogether as proper, and is, indeed, on many -accounts, more eligible, where new powers were -wanted, than a court absolutely new. But -courts incommodiously situated, in effect, deny -justice; and a court, partaking in the fruits of -its own condemnation, is a robber. The Congress -complain, and complain justly, of this -grievance.</p> - -<p>These are the three consequential propositions. -I have thought of two or three more, but they -come rather too near detail, and to the province -of executive government, which I wish Parliament -always to superintend, never to assume. -If the first six are granted, congruity will carry -the latter three. If not, the things that remain -unrepealed will be, I hope, rather unseemly encumbrances -on the building, than very materially -detrimental to its strength and stability.</p> - -<p>Here, sir, I should close, but that I plainly -perceive some objections remain, which I<span class="pagenum" id="Page_276">276</span> -ought, if possible, to remove. The first will be, -that, in resorting to the doctrine of our ancestors, -as contained in the preamble to the -Chester act, I prove too much; that the grievance -from a want of representation stated in -that preamble, goes to the whole of legislation -as well as to taxation. And that the colonies, -grounding themselves upon that doctrine, -will apply it to all parts of legislative authority.</p> - -<p>To this objection, with all possible deference -and humility, and wishing as little as any man -living to impair the smallest particle of our supreme -authority, I answer, that <em>the words are the -words of Parliament, and not mine</em>; and that all -false and inconclusive inferences drawn from -them are not mine, for I heartily disclaim any -such inference. I have chosen the words of an -act of Parliament, which Mr. Grenville, surely a -tolerably zealous and very judicious advocate for -the sovereignty of Parliament, formerly moved -to have read at your table, in confirmation of -his tenets. It is true that Lord Chatham considered -these preambles as declaring strongly in -favor of his opinions. He was a no less powerful -advocate for the privileges of the Americans. -Ought I not from hence to presume that these<span class="pagenum" id="Page_277">277</span> -preambles are as favorable as possible to both, -when properly understood; favorable both to the -rights of Parliament, and to the privilege of the -dependencies of this crown? But, sir, the object -of grievance in my resolution I have not -taken from the Chester, but from the Durham -act, which confines the hardship of want of representation -to the case of subsidies, and which, -therefore, falls in exactly with the case of the -colonies. But whether the unrepresented counties -were <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">de jure</i> or <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">de facto</i> bound, the preambles -do not accurately distinguish; nor indeed -was it necessary; for, whether <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">de jure</i> or <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">de facto</i>, -the Legislature thought the exercise of the -power of taxing, as of right, or as of fact without -right, equally a grievance, and equally oppressive.</p> - -<p>I do not know that the colonies have, in any -general way or in any cool hour, gone much beyond -the demand of immunity in relation to -taxes. It is not fair to judge of the temper or -dispositions of any man, or any set of men, when -they are composed and at rest, from their conduct -or their expressions in a state of disturbance -and irritation. It is, besides, a very -great mistake to imagine that mankind follow -up practically any speculative principle, either<span class="pagenum" id="Page_278">278</span> -of government or freedom, as far as it will go in -argument and logical illation. We Englishmen -stop very short of the principles upon which we -support any given part of our Constitution, or -even the whole of it together. I could easily, if -I had not already tired you, give you very -striking and convincing instances of it. This is -nothing but what is natural and proper. All -government, indeed every human benefit and -enjoyment, every virtue and every prudent act, -is founded on compromise and barter.<a id="FNanchor_71" href="#Footnote_71" class="fnanchor">71</a> We -balance inconveniences; we give and take; we -remit some rights that we may enjoy others; -and we choose rather to be happy citizens than -subtle disputants. As we must give away some -natural liberty to enjoy civil advantages, so we -must sacrifice some civil liberties for the advantages -to be derived from the communion and -fellowship of a great empire. But, in all fair -dealings, the thing bought must bear some proportion -to the purchase paid. None will barter -away “the immediate jewel of his soul.”<a id="FNanchor_72" href="#Footnote_72" class="fnanchor">72</a> -Though a great house is apt to make slaves -haughty, yet it is purchasing a part of the artificial -importance of a great empire too dear to -pay for it all essential rights and all the intrinsic -dignity of human nature. None of us who<span class="pagenum" id="Page_279">279</span> -would not risk his life rather than fall under a -government purely arbitrary. But, although -there are some among us who think our Constitution -wants many improvements to make it a -complete system of liberty, perhaps none who -are of that opinion would think it right to -aim at such improvement by disturbing his -country, and risking every thing that is dear to -him. In every arduous enterprise we consider -what we are to lose as well as what we are to -gain; and the more and better stake of liberty -every people possess, the less they will hazard -in a vain attempt to make it more. These are -<em>the cords of man</em>.<a id="FNanchor_73" href="#Footnote_73" class="fnanchor">73</a> Man acts from adequate -motive relative to his interest, and not on -metaphysical speculations. Aristotle, the great -master of reasoning, cautions us, and with -great weight and propriety, against this species -of delusive geometrical accuracy in moral arguments -as the most fallacious of all sophistry.<a id="FNanchor_74" href="#Footnote_74" class="fnanchor">74</a></p> - -<p>The Americans will have no interest contrary -to the grandeur and glory of England, when -they are not oppressed by the weight of it; and -they will rather be inclined to respect the acts -of a superintending Legislature, when they see -them the acts of that power which is itself the -security, not the rival, of their secondary importance.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_280">280</span> -In this assurance my mind most -perfectly acquiesces, and I confess I feel not -the least alarm from the discontents which are -to arise from putting people at their ease; nor -do I apprehend the destruction of this empire -from giving, by an act of free grace and indulgence, -to two millions of my fellow-citizens, -some share of those rights upon which I have -always been taught to value myself.</p> - -<p>It is said, indeed, that this power of granting, -vested in American assemblies, would dissolve -the unity of the empire, which was preserved -entire, although Wales, and Chester, and Durham -were added to it. Truly, Mr. Speaker, I -do not know what this unity means, nor has it -ever been heard of, that I know, in the constitutional -policy of this country. The very idea -of subordination of parts excludes this notion -of simple and undivided unity. England is the -head, but she is not the head and the members -too. Ireland has ever had from the beginning -a separate, but not an independent -Legislature, which, far from distracting, promoted -the union of the whole. Every thing -was sweetly and harmoniously disposed through -both islands for the conservation of English -dominion and the communication of English<span class="pagenum" id="Page_281">281</span> -liberties. I do not see that the same principles -might not be carried into twenty islands, and -with the same good effect. This is my model -with regard to America, as far as the internal -circumstances of the two countries are the -same. I know no other unity of this empire -than I can draw from its example during these -periods, when it seemed to my poor understanding -more united than it is now, or than it -is likely to be by the present methods.</p> - -<p>But since I speak of these methods, I recollect, -Mr. Speaker, almost too late, that I -promised, before I finished, to say something -of the proposition of the noble Lord [Lord -North] on the floor, which has been so lately -received, and stands on your journals. I must -be deeply concerned whenever it is my misfortune -to continue a difference with the majority -of this House. But as the reasons for -that difference are my apology for thus troubling -you, suffer me to state them in a very few -words. I shall compress them into as small a -body as I possibly can, having already debated -that matter at large when the question was before -the committee.</p> - -<p>First, then I cannot admit that proposition -of a ransom by auction, because it is a mere<span class="pagenum" id="Page_282">282</span> -project. It is a thing new; unheard of; supported -by no experience; justified by no analogy; -without example of our ancestors, or root -in the Constitution. It is neither regular parliamentary -taxation nor colony grant. “<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Experimentum -in corpore vili</i>”<a id="FNanchor_75" href="#Footnote_75" class="fnanchor">75</a> is a good rule, -which will ever make me adverse to any trial -of experiments on what is certainly the most -valuable of all subjects, the peace of this empire.</p> - -<p>Secondly, it is an experiment which must be -fatal, in the end, to our Constitution. For -what is it but a scheme for taxing the colonies -in the ante-chamber of the noble Lord and his -successors? To settle the quotas and proportions -in this House is clearly impossible. You, -sir, may flatter yourself you shall sit a state -auctioneer with your hammer in your hand, -and knock down to each colony as it bids. But -to settle (on the plan laid down by the noble -Lord) the true proportional payment for four -or five-and-twenty governments according to -the absolute and the relative wealth of each, and -according to the British proportion of wealth -and burden, is a wild and chimerical notion. -This new taxation must therefore come in by -the back door of the Constitution. Each quota<span class="pagenum" id="Page_283">283</span> -must be brought to this House ready formed; -you can neither add nor alter. You must -register it. You can do nothing farther. For -on what grounds can you deliberate, either before -or after the proposition. You cannot -hear the counsel for all these provinces, quarrelling -each on its own quantity of payment, -and its proportion to others. If you should -attempt it, the committee of provincial ways -and means, or by whatever other name it will -delight to be called, must swallow up all the -time of Parliament.</p> - -<p>Thirdly, it does not give satisfaction to the -complaint of the colonies. They complain -that they are taxed without their consent; you -answer, that you will fix the sum at which -they shall be taxed. That is, you give them -the very grievance for the remedy. You tell -them indeed, that you will leave the mode to -themselves. I really beg pardon. It gives me -pain to mention it; but you must be sensible -that you will <em>not perform</em> this part of the contract. -For, suppose the colonies were to lay -the duties which furnished their contingent -upon the importation of your manufactures? -you know you would never suffer such a tax to -be laid. You know, too, that you would not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_284">284</span> -suffer many other modes of taxation; so that -when you come to explain yourself, it will be -found that you will neither leave to themselves -the quantum nor the mode, nor, indeed, any -thing. The whole is delusion from one end to -the other.</p> - -<p>Fourthly, this method of ransom by auction, -unless it be <em>universally</em> accepted, will plunge -you into great and inextricable difficulties. In -what year of our Lord are the proportions of -payments to be settled, to say nothing of the -impossibility, that colony agents should have -general powers of taxing the colonies at their -discretion? Consider, I implore you, that the -communication by special messages, and orders -between these agents and their constituents on -each variation of the case, when the parties -come to contend together, and to dispute on -their relative proportions, will be a matter of -delay, perplexity, and confusion that never can -have an end.</p> - -<p>If all the colonies do not appear at the outcry, -what is the condition of those assemblies, -who offer, by themselves or their agents, to tax -themselves up to your ideas of their proportion? -The refractory colonies who refuse all -composition will remain taxed only to your old<span class="pagenum" id="Page_285">285</span> -impositions, which, however grievous in principle, -are trifling as to production. The obedient -colonies in this scheme are heavily taxed; the -refractory remain unburdened. What will you -do? Will you lay new and heavier taxes by -Parliament on the disobedient? Pray consider -in what way you can do it. You are perfectly -convinced that in the way of taxing you can do -nothing but at the ports. Now suppose it is -Virginia that refuses to appear at your auction, -while Maryland and North Carolina bid handsomely -for their ransom, and are taxed to your -quota. How will you put these colonies on a -par? Will you tax the tobacco of Virginia? If -you do, you give its death wound to your English -revenue at home, and to one of the very greatest -articles of your own foreign trade. If you -tax the import of that rebellious colony, what -do you tax but your own manufactures, or the -goods of some other obedient and already well-taxed -colony? Who has said one word on this -labyrinth of detail, which bewilders you more -and more as you enter into it? Who has presented, -who can present you with a clew to -lead you out of it? I think, sir, it is impossible -that you should not recollect that the -colony bounds are so implicated in one another<span class="pagenum" id="Page_286">286</span> -(you know it by your on experiments in the -bill for prohibiting the New England fishery) -that you can lay no possible restraints on almost -any of them which may not be presently -eluded, if you do not confound the innocent -with the guilty, and burden those whom, upon -every principle, you ought to exonerate. He -must be grossly ignorant of America who thinks -that, without falling into this confusion of all -rules of equity and policy, you can restrain -any single colony, especially Virginia and Maryland, -the central and most important of them -all.</p> - -<p>Let it also be considered, that either in the -present confusion you settle a permanent contingent -which will and must be trifling, and then -you have no effectual revenue; or, you change -the quota at every exigency, and then on every -new repartition you will have a new quarrel.</p> - -<p>Reflect, besides, that when you have fixed a -quota for every colony, you have not provided -for prompt and punctual payment. Suppose -one, two, five, ten years arrears. You cannot -issue a Treasury Extent<a id="FNanchor_76" href="#Footnote_76" class="fnanchor">76</a> against the failing -colony. You must make new Boston Port bills, -new restraining laws, new acts for dragging men -to England for trial. You must send out new<span class="pagenum" id="Page_287">287</span> -fleets, new armies. All is to begin again. From -this day forward the empire is never to know -an hour’s tranquillity. An intestine fire will be -kept alive in the bowels of the colonies, which -one time or another must consume this whole -Empire. I allow, indeed, that the Empire of -Germany raises her revenue and her troops by -quotas and contingents; but the revenue of the -Empire, and the army of the Empire, is the -worst revenue and the worst army in the world.</p> - -<p>Instead of a standing revenue, you will therefore -have a perpetual quarrel. Indeed, the noble -Lord who proposed this project of a ransom by -auction, seemed himself to be of that opinion. -His project was rather designed for breaking -the union of the colonies than for establishing -a revenue. He confessed that he apprehended -that his proposal would not be to <em>their taste</em>. -I say this scheme of disunion seems to be at -the bottom of the project; for I will not suspect -that the noble Lord meant nothing but -merely to delude the nation by an airy phantom -which he never intended to realize. But, -whatever his views may be, as I propose the -peace and union of the colonies as the very -foundation of my plan, it cannot accord with -one whose foundation is perpetual discord.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_288">288</span> -Compare the two. This I offer to give you -is plain and simple. The other, full of perplexed -and intricate mazes. This is mild; that, harsh. -This is found by experience effectual for its -purposes; the other is a new project. This is -universal; the other, calculated for certain colonies -only. This is immediate in its conciliatory -operation; the other, remote, contingent, -full of hazard. Mine is what becomes the dignity -of a ruling people; gratuitous, unconditional, -and not held out as matter of bargain -and sale. I have done my duty in proposing it -to you. I have indeed tired you by a long discourse; -but this is the misfortune of those to -whose influence nothing will be conceded, and -who must win every inch of their ground by -argument. You have heard me with goodness. -May you decide with wisdom! For my part, I -feel my mind greatly disburdened by what I -have done to-day. I have been the less fearful -of trying your patience, because on this subject -I mean to spare it altogether in future. I have -this comfort, that in every stage of the American -affairs, I have steadily opposed the measures -that have produced the confusion, and may -bring on the destruction of this Empire. I now -go so far as to risk a proposal of my own. If I<span class="pagenum" id="Page_289">289</span> -cannot give peace to my country, I give it to -my conscience.</p> - -<p>But what, says the financier, is peace to us -without money? Your plan gives us no revenue. -No! But it does—for it secures to the -subject the power of REFUSAL—the first of -all revenues. Experience is a cheat, and fact a -liar, if this power in the subject of proportioning -his grant, or of not granting at all, has not -been found the richest mine of revenue ever -discovered by the skill or by the fortune of -man. It does not indeed vote you £152,750 -11<i>s.</i> 2¾<i>d.</i>, nor any other paltry limited sum, but -it gives the strong box itself, the fund, the bank, -from whence only revenues can arise among -a people sensible of freedom: <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Posita luditur -arca</i>.<a id="FNanchor_77" href="#Footnote_77" class="fnanchor">77</a></p> - -<p>Cannot you in England; cannot you at this -time of day; cannot you—a House of Commons—trust -to the principle which has raised -so mighty a revenue, and accumulated a debt -of near one hundred and forty millions in this -country? Is this principle to be true in England -and false everywhere else? Is it not true -in Ireland? Has it not hitherto been true in -the colonies? Why should you presume, that -in any country, a body duly constituted for any<span class="pagenum" id="Page_290">290</span> -functions will neglect to perform its duty, and -abdicate its trust? Such a presumption would -go against all government in all modes. But, -in truth, this dread of penury of supply, from a -free assembly, has no foundation in nature. For -first observe, that, besides the desire, which all -men have naturally, of supporting the honor of -their own government, that sense of dignity, -and that security of property, which ever attends -freedom, has a tendency to increase the -stock of the free community. Most may be -taken where most is accumulated. And what -is the soil or climate where experience has not -uniformly proved that the voluntary flow of -heaped-up plenty, bursting from the weight of -its own rich luxuriance, has ever run with a -more copious stream of revenue, than could be -squeezed from the dry husks of oppressed indigence, -by the straining of all the politic machinery -in the world.</p> - -<p>Next, we know that parties must ever exist -in a free country. We know, too, that the -emulations of such parties, their contradictions, -their reciprocal necessities, their hopes and -their fears, must send them all in their turns to -him that holds the balance of the state. The -parties are the gamesters, but Government<span class="pagenum" id="Page_291">291</span> -keeps the table, and is sure to be the winner in -the end. When this game is played, I really -think it is more to be feared that the people -will be exhausted, than that Government will -not be supplied; whereas, whatever is got -by acts of absolute power, ill obeyed, because -odious, or by contracts ill kept, because constrained, -will be narrow, feeble, uncertain, and -precarious.</p> - -<div class="poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i16">“Ease would retract<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Vows made in pain, as violent and void.”<a id="FNanchor_78" href="#Footnote_78" class="fnanchor">78</a><br /></span> -</div></div> -</div> - -<p>I, for one, protest against compounding our -demands. I declare against compounding, for a -poor limited sum, the immense ever-growing, -eternal debt which is due to generous government -from protected freedom. And so may I -speed in the great object I propose to you, as I -think it would not only be an act of injustice, -but would be the worst economy in the world, -to compel the colonies to a sum certain, either -in the way of ransom or in the way of compulsory -compact.</p> - -<p>But to clear up my ideas on this subject; a -revenue from America transmitted hither—do -not delude yourselves—you never can receive it—no, -not a shilling. We have experienced -that from remote countries it is not to be expected.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_292">292</span> -If, when you attempted to extract -revenue from Bengal, you were obliged to return -in loan what you had taken in imposition, -what can you expect from North America? for -certainly, if ever there was a country qualified -to produce wealth, it is India; or an institution -fit for the transmission, it is the East India -Company. America has none of these aptitudes. -If America gives you taxable objects -on which you lay your duties <em>here</em>, and gives -you, at the same time, a surplus by a foreign -sale of her commodities to pay the duties on -these objects which you tax at home, she has -performed her part to the British revenue. But -with regard to her own internal establishments, -she may, I doubt not she will, contribute in -moderation; I say in moderation, for she ought -not to be permitted to exhaust herself. She -ought to be reserved to a war, the weight of -which, with the enemies that we are most likely -to have, must be considerable in her quarter of -the globe. There she may serve you, and serve -you essentially.</p> - -<p>For that service, for all service, whether of -revenue, trade or empire, my trust is in her -interest in the British Constitution. My hold -of the colonies is in the close affection which<span class="pagenum" id="Page_293">293</span> -grows from common names, from kindred -blood, from similar privileges, and equal protection. -These are ties which, though light as -air, are as strong as links of iron. Let the colonies -always keep the idea of their civil rights -associated with your government; they will -cling and grapple to you, and no force under -heaven will be of power to tear them from their -allegiance. But let it be once understood that -your government may be one thing, and their -privileges another; that these two things may -exist without any mutual relation; the cement -is gone; the cohesion is loosened; and every -thing hastens to decay and dissolution. As -long as you have the wisdom to keep the sovereign -authority of this country as the sanctuary -of liberty, the sacred temple consecrated to our -common faith, wherever the chosen race and -sons of England worship Freedom, they will -turn their faces toward you. The more they -multiply, the more friends you will have. The -more ardently they love liberty, the more perfect -will be their obedience. Slavery they can have -anywhere. It is a weed that grows in every -soil. They may have it from Spain; they may -have it from Prussia; but, until you become -lost to all feeling of your true interest and your<span class="pagenum" id="Page_294">294</span> -natural dignity, freedom they can have from -none but you. This is the commodity of price, -of which you have the monopoly. This is the -true Act of Navigation, which binds to you the -commerce of the colonies, and through them -secures to you the wealth of the world. Deny -them this participation of freedom, and you -break that sole bond which originally made, -and must still preserve, the unity of the empire. -Do not entertain so weak an imagination as -that your registers and your bonds, your affidavits -and your sufferances, your cockets and -your clearances, are what form the great securities -of your commerce. Do not dream that -your letters of office, and your instructions, and -your suspending clauses, are the things that -hold together the great contexture of this -mysterious whole. These things do not make -your government. Dead instruments, passive -tools as they are, it is the spirit of the English -communion that gives all their life and efficacy -to them. It is the spirit of the English Constitution, -which, infused through the mighty -mass, pervades, feeds, unites, invigorates, vivifies -every part of the empire, even down to the -minutest member.<a id="FNanchor_79" href="#Footnote_79" class="fnanchor">79</a></p> - -<p>Is it not the same virtue which does every -thing for us here in England?</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_295">295</span> -Do you imagine then, that it is the Land -Tax<a id="FNanchor_80" href="#Footnote_80" class="fnanchor">80</a> which raises your revenue? that it is the -annual vote in the Committee of Supply, which -gives you your army? or that it is the Mutiny -Bill,<a id="FNanchor_81" href="#Footnote_81" class="fnanchor">81</a> which inspires it with bravery and discipline? -No! surely no! It is the love of the -people; it is their attachment to their Government, -from the sense of the deep stake they -have in such a glorious institution, which gives -you your army and your navy, and infuses into -both that liberal obedience, without which your -army would be a base rabble, and your navy -nothing but rotten timber.</p> - -<p>All this, I know well enough, will sound wild -and chimerical to the profane herd of those -vulgar and mechanical politicians, who have no -place among us; a sort of people who think -that nothing exists but what is gross and material, -and who, therefore, far from being qualified -to be directors of the great movement of empire, -are not fit to turn a wheel in the machine. -But to men truly initiated and rightly -taught, these ruling and master principles, -which, in the opinion of such men as I have -mentioned, have no substantial existence, are -in truth every thing and all in all. Magnanimity -in politics is not seldom the truest wisdom;<span class="pagenum" id="Page_296">296</span> -and a great empire and little minds go -ill together. If we are conscious of our situation, -and glow with zeal to fill our place as becomes -our station and ourselves, we ought to -auspicate all our public proceeding on America -with the old warning of the church, <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">sursum corda</i>!<a id="FNanchor_82" href="#Footnote_82" class="fnanchor">82</a> -We ought to elevate our minds to the -greatness of that trust to which the order of -Providence has called us. By adverting to the -dignity of this high calling, our ancestors have -turned a savage wilderness into a glorious empire, -and have made the most extensive and -the only honorable conquests, not by destroying -but by promoting, the wealth, the number, the -happiness of the human race. Let us get an -American revenue as we have got an American -empire. English privileges have made it all -that it is; English privileges alone will make -it all it can be.</p> - -<p>In full confidence of this unalterable truth, -I now, <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">quod felix faustumque sit</i>,<a id="FNanchor_83" href="#Footnote_83" class="fnanchor">83</a> lay the -first stone in the temple of peace; and I move -you,</p> - -<p>That the colonies and plantations of Great -Britain in North America, consisting of fourteen -separate governments, and containing two millions -and upward of free inhabitants, have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_297">297</span> -not had the liberty and privilege of electing -and sending any knights and burgesses, or -others, to represent them in the high court of -Parliament.</p> - -<blockquote class="end"> - -<p>On the first resolution offered by Mr. Burke the votes in favor -of it were only 78 while those against it were 270. The other -resolutions were not put to vote. This may be regarded as the -final answer of the House of Commons to all attempts to save -the colonies except by force. The policy of war was thus -adopted, with what result the world very well knows.</p></blockquote> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_299">299</span></p> - -<div class="chapter"><div class="footnotes"> -<h2 class="nobreak p1" id="ILLUSTRATIVE_NOTES">ILLUSTRATIVE NOTES.</h2> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 1</span></a>, <a href="#Page_8">p. 8</a>.—Ever since the Norman Conquest the royal -assent to measures of Parliament has been given in a form from -which there has been no variation. To “public bills” the words -attached are “<i xml:lang="fr" lang="fr">le roy le veult</i>”; to petitions, “<i xml:lang="fr" lang="fr">soit droit fait -comme il est désiré</i>”; and for grants of money, “<em>the King -heartily thanks his subjects for their good wills</em>.” In the present -instance, instead of <i xml:lang="fr" lang="fr">soit droit fait comme il est désiré</i>, the King -caused to be appended to the petition, “The King willeth -that right be done according to the laws and customs of the -realm; that the statutes be put into due execution; and that -his subjects may have no cause to complain of any wrong or -oppressions contrary to their just rights and liberties, to the -preservation whereof he holds himself in conscience as well -obliged, as of his own prerogative.”—Rushworth, i., 588. On -the forms of royal assent see the learned account by Selden in -“Parliamentary History,” viii., 237.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 2</span></a>, <a href="#Page_9">p. 9</a>.—Rushworth, i., 591. The version of Eliot’s -speech given by Rushworth is the one ordinarily reprinted in -modern collections. But in the papers of the Earl of St. -Germans, a descendant of Sir John Eliot, Mr. John Forster, -some years ago, found a copy of the speech corrected by Eliot -himself while in prison. This form, much superior to the -others, is the one here reproduced.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 3</span></a>, <a href="#Page_16">p. 16</a>.—Eliot, in the expression, “want of councils,” -doubtless alludes to the absorption of the various powers -of the State by Buckingham. The allusion was not without -reason, as the list of Buckingham’s titles shows. He was: -Duke, Marquis, and Earl of Buckingham, Earl of Coventry, -Viscount Villiers, Baron of Whaddon, Great Admiral of England -and Ireland, etc., etc., etc., Governor-General of the Seas -and the Ships of the same, Lieutenant-General Admiral, Captain-General -and Governor of his Majesty’s fleet and army, -etc., Minister of the House, Lord Warden, Chancellor, and -Admiral of the Cinque Ports, etc., Constable of Dover Castle, -Justice in Eyrie of the Forest of Chases on this side of the -Trent, Constable of the Castle of Windsor, Gentleman of the -Bedchamber, Knight of the Garter, Privy Councillor, etc. -The royal domains that he had managed to have given to him -brought an income of £284,395 a year. All this was so much -drawn from the public treasury. See Bradie’s “Constitutional -History,” new edition, vol. i., p. 424, and Guizot, “Charles -I.,” Bohn’s ed., p. 15.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_300">300</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_4" href="#FNanchor_4" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 4</span></a>, <a href="#Page_17">p. 17</a>.—The Elector Palatine, Frederick V., had -married Elizabeth, the daughter of James I., of England, and -by his election as King of Bohemia, became in a certain sense -the representative and head of the Protestant party in Germany -at the outbreak of the Thirty Years’ War in 1618. His cause -was badly managed at home, and still more wretchedly managed -in England. Constantly deluded with hopes of support from -the great Protestant power in the North, he was doomed to -perpetual disappointment. His cause was shattered at the -first serious conflict at White Mountain in 1620, and he was -obliged to flee to Holland for his life. Twelve thousand English -troops were subsequently sent to the support of Mansfeldt, -but they were so ill managed that they nearly all perished -before they could be of any assistance. The sacrifice of -“honor” and of “men” was most abundant.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_5" href="#FNanchor_5" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 5</span></a>, <a href="#Page_17">p. 17</a>.—In 1627 Richelieu was engaged in the -work of reducing La Rochelle, the stronghold of the Huguenots, -into subordination to the King of France. The -work had to be done by means of a siege, which included -the construction of a dyke across the mouth of the harbor. -Buckingham, inflamed with resentment against Richelieu, -for personal reasons, determined to relieve the -Rochellois. He collected a hundred ships and seven -thousand land forces, and advanced to the rescue. But -on reaching the scene of action, instead of advancing immediately -to relieve the beleaguered city, he disembarked on -the Isle of Rhée, and contented himself with issuing a proclamation, -calling upon all French Protestants to arise for a -relief of their brethren. The result was two-fold. In the first -place, La Rochelle, after one of the most memorable sieges in -all history, was reduced; and, secondly, the cause of Protestantism -in France was completely crushed. In response to -Buckingham’s call, the Protestants everywhere arose; but -Richelieu was now at leisure to destroy them, and thus their -last hope perished.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_301">301</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_6" href="#FNanchor_6" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 6</span></a>, <a href="#Page_17">p. 17</a>.—The beauty of this allusion to the policy -and the power of Queen Elizabeth has very justly been greatly -admired. Nothing could have been more adroit than Eliot’s -comparison of the ways of Elizabeth with those of Buckingham.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_7" href="#FNanchor_7" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 7</span></a>, <a href="#Page_20">p. 20</a>.—Having now come to the third division of -his subject, “The insufficiency of our generals,” Eliot naturally -pauses before dragging Buckingham personally upon the -scene. But for what follows the Duke was personally responsible.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_8" href="#FNanchor_8" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 8</span></a>, <a href="#Page_21">p. 21</a>.—In 1625 an expedition of eighty sail had -been fitted out for the purpose of intercepting the Spanish -treasure ships from America. But by reason of the incompetency -of the commander there was no concert of action in -the fleet, and the treasure ships escaped, though seven of them -that would have richly repaid the expedition might easily have -been taken. But not wishing to return empty handed, the -commander effected a landing near Cadiz. The soldiers broke -open the wine-cellars and became so drunk that when the -commander determined to withdraw, several hundred were -left to perish under the knives of the peasants.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_302">302</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_9" href="#FNanchor_9" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 9</span></a>, <a href="#Page_24">p. 24</a>.—What the orator contemptuously calls the -“journey to Algiers,” was nothing less than an expedition sent -out for its conquest. But it fared like the most of Buckingham’s -other “journeys.” The Algerines turned upon the -English; and thirty-five ships engaged in the Mediterranean -trade were destroyed, and their crews sold into slavery.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_10" href="#FNanchor_10" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 10</span></a>, <a href="#Page_43">p. 43</a>.—For powers and privileges of the early -English Parliaments, see Stubbs, ii., §§ 220–233, and 271–298. -Also on the right of Parliament to make a grant depend -on redress of grievances, Hallam: “Mid. Ages,” Am. ed., iii., -p. 84, <i>seq.</i> It is a curious fact that in the Early Middle Ages -there was a very general reluctance on the part of towns to -send representatives. Hallam: “Mid. Ages,” iii., 111. Cox: -“Ant. Parl. Elections,” 84, 93, 98. Todd: “Parl. Govt.,” -ii., 21. Hearn: “Govt. in Eng.,” 394–407.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_11" href="#FNanchor_11" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 11</span></a>, <a href="#Page_43">p. 43</a>.—Bagehot, in his remarkable work on the -English Constitution (p. 133) lays much stress on what he -calls “the teaching” and “informing” functions of the House -of Commons. “In old times one office of the House of Commons -was to inform the Sovereign what was wrong.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_12" href="#FNanchor_12" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 12</span></a>, <a href="#Page_45">p. 45</a>.—There is a remarkable letter written by -Thomas Allured, a member of the Parliament of 1628, which -describes what took place on the day alluded to. The letter is -preserved in Rushworth’s Hist., Coll. i., 609–10, and in part is -reproduced in Carlyle’s Cromwell, i., 46. After saying that -“Upon Tuesday, Sir John Eliot moved that as we intended to -furnish his Majesty with money, we should also supply him -with counsel,” he says: “But next day, Wednesday, we had -a message from his Majesty, by the Speaker ‘that we should -husband the time and despatch our old business without entertaining -new.’ Yesterday, Thursday morning, a new message -was brought us, which I have here inclosed, which, requiring -us not to cast or lay any aspersion on any Minister of -his Majesty, the House was much affected thereby. Sir -Robert Philips, of Somershire, spoke and mingled his words -with weeping. Mr. Pym did the like. Sir Edward Cook, -overcome with passion, seeing the desolation likely to ensue, -was forced to sit down, when he began to speak, by abundance -of tears. Yea, the Speaker in his speech could not refrain -from weeping and shedding of tears, besides a great many -others whose grief made them dumb. But others bore up in -that storm and encouraged the rest.” The writer then states -how the House resolved itself into a Committee, how the Speaker -who was in close communication with the King, asked for -leave to withdraw for half an hour, and how “It was ordered -that no other man leave the House on pain of going to the -Tower.” He then continues: “Sir Edward Cook told us -‘He now saw God had not accepted of our humble and moderate -carriages and fair proceedings; and he feared the reason -was, we had not dealt sincerely with the King and country, and -made a true representation of all these miseries, which he, for -his part, repented that he had not done sooner. And, therefore, -not knowing whether he should ever again speak in this -House, he would now do it freely; and so did here protest, -that the author and cause of all these miseries was the <span class="smcap">Duke -of Buckingham</span>,’ which was entertained and answered with a -cheerful acclamation of the House. As when one good hound -recovers the scent, the rest come in with full cry, so they pursued -it, and every one came home, and laid the blame where -he thought the fault was. And as we were putting it to the -question whether he should be <em>named</em> in our <em>Remonstrance</em>, -as the chief cause of all our miseries at home and abroad, the -Speaker having been, not half an hour, but three hours absent, -and with the King, returned, bringing this message: -‘That the House should then rise, adjourn till the morrow -morning, no Committee sit or other business go on in the interim.’ -What we expect this morning, God in heaven knows! -We shall meet betimes this morning, partly for the business’ -sake, and partly because two days ago we made an order, that -whoever comes in after Prayers shall pay twelve pence to the -poor.” -</p> -<p> -The events alluded to by Pym in this rapid indictment are -all given in considerable detail in “Parl. Hist.,” ii., 442–525. -On the 2d of March, when Eliot moved a new Remonstrance, -the Speaker refused to put the motion, alleging an order from -the King. The House insisted, whereupon he was about to -leave the Chair. Holles, Valentine, and some others forced -him back into it. “God’s wounds,” said Holles, “you shall -sit till it please the House to rise.” And much else of a -similar nature. “Parl. Hist.,” ii., 487–491.</p> -</div> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_304">304</span></p> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_13" href="#FNanchor_13" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 13</span></a>, <a href="#Page_47">p. 47</a>.—The moderation of Pym in this part of his -speech will appear evident to every one at all familiar with -the course of events under the influence of Laud. A brief -but excellent account of the influence of that prelate’s policy -is given by Guizot, <cite>Eng. Rev.</cite>, Bohn ed., pp. 49–59.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_14" href="#FNanchor_14" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 14</span></a>, <a href="#Page_50">p. 50</a>.—The particular privileges here enumerated -were all contrary to the statute passed in the reign of -Elizabeth. The significance of the tolerance of Catholics -was chiefly in the fact that during the same time the <em>Protestant</em> -Nonconformist was subjected to every indignity for refusing -to bow his conscience to the prescribed formula of doctrine -and ceremony. Laud’s favor toward the Catholics was -so marked that the Pope offered him a Cardinal’s hat. Laud’s -“Diary,” p. 49.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_15" href="#FNanchor_15" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 15</span></a>, <a href="#Page_51">p. 51</a>.—The most notorious cases were Dr. -Montague and Dr. Mainwaring, who both received rich benefices -and afterwards became Catholics. A daughter of the -Duke of Devonshire entered the Catholic Church. When -Laud asked for her reasons she responded: “I hate to be in -a crowd, and as I perceive your Grace and many others are -hastening toward Rome, I want to get there comfortably by -myself before you.”</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_305">305</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_16" href="#FNanchor_16" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 16</span></a>, <a href="#Page_52">p. 52</a>.—The Crown and the Archbishop regarded -Sunday “simply as one of the holidays of the Church,” and -encouraged the people in pastimes and recreations. A -“Book of Sports” had been issued in the time of James I., -pointing out the amusements the people might properly indulge -in. Laud now ordered that every minister should read -the declaration in favor of Sunday pastimes from the pulpit. -Some refused. One had the wit to obey, and to close his reading -with the declaration: “You have heard read, good people, -both the commandment of God and the commandment -of man. Obey which you please.” As the result of disobeying -the command, however, many were silenced or deposed. In -the diocese of Norwich alone, thirty clergymen were expelled -from their cures. See Green: “Hist. of Eng. Peo.,” -Eng. ed., iii., 160.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_17" href="#FNanchor_17" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 17</span></a>, <a href="#Page_54">p. 54</a>.—Of this part of Pym’s speech Mr. Forster -says: “A more massive document was never given to history. -It has all the solidity, weight, and gravity of a judicial record, -while it addresses itself equally to the solid good sense of the -masses of the people, and to the cultivated understandings of -the time. The deliberative gravity, the force, the broad, decided -manner of this great speaker, contrast forcibly with those -choice specimens of awkward affectations and labored extravagances, -that have not seldom passed in modern times for -oratory.” “Life of Pym,” p. 99.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_18" href="#FNanchor_18" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 18</span></a>, <a href="#Page_58">p. 58</a>.—The seventh and twelfth of James I. were -1610 and 1615.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_19" href="#FNanchor_19" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 19</span></a>, <a href="#Page_58">p. 58</a>.—The Thirty Years’ War in the Palatinate -in which the sons-in-law of James I. were the representative -of the Protestant cause.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_306">306</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_20" href="#FNanchor_20" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 20</span></a>, <a href="#Page_62">p. 62</a>.—A partial list of fines imposed between -1629 and 1640 is given in Guizot, <cite>Eng. Rev.</cite>, 445. The list -includes “Hillyard, for having sold saltpetre, £5,000”; -“John Averman, for not having followed the King’s orders in -the fabrication of soap, £13,000”; “Morley, for having -struck Sir George Thesbold within the precinct of the Court, -£10,000”; and a vast number of other similar ones.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_21" href="#FNanchor_21" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 21</span></a>, <a href="#Page_64">p. 64</a>.—The tax known as ship money, which had -its origin in the necessity of universal defence when the country -was threatened with invasion was attempted by Charles but -resisted by John Hampden. The case went to trial, and the -judges by a bare majority decided in favor of the legality of -the tax. The decision is, however, not now regarded as having -been correct. The case is reviewed in Hallam, “Con. -Hist.,” i., 430.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_22" href="#FNanchor_22" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 22</span></a>, <a href="#Page_65">p. 65</a>.—The “bounds and perambulations” were -the boundary marks and legally established roads and paths. -This was at a time when there were very few, if any, inclosures. -The possibilities of dispute were taken advantage of by the -Government in a way that was enormously oppressive. For -example, the Earl of Salisbury was fined £20,000 for “encroachments,” -Westmorland £19,000, etc. Guizot: <cite>Eng. -Rev.</cite>, 445.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_23" href="#FNanchor_23" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 23</span></a>, <a href="#Page_68">p. 68</a>.—The application of this grievance was particularly -burdensome in the vicinity of London. Exemption -from demolition was purchased by the immediate payment of -fine amounting to a three years’ tax.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_24" href="#FNanchor_24" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 24</span></a>, <a href="#Page_69">p. 69</a>.—The King had specifically agreed in the -“Petition of Right” to correct the grievance here complained -of. And yet it continued after eleven years to be “a -growing evil.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_25" href="#FNanchor_25" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 25</span></a>, <a href="#Page_72">p. 72</a>.—The “projectors” referred to were those -undertaking monopolies. The “referees” were law officers -appointed by the Crown to decide all legal questions arising in -regard to monopolies. In 1621 Buckingham threw the blame -of all irregularities in the matter of monopolies on the “referees,” -and, on motion of Cranfield, a Parliamentary inquiry -was made into their conduct. The matter is explained in -Gardiner’s “History of England,” 2d ed., iv., 48; and in -Church’s “Bacon,” 128.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_307">307</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_26" href="#FNanchor_26" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 26</span></a>, <a href="#Page_82">p. 82</a>.—The reader who has followed this speech -so far certainly will not be surprised that Pym at length experienced -some “confusion of memory.” The “opportunity” -was never afforded, as parliament was dissolved within three -days.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_27" href="#FNanchor_27" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 27</span></a>, <a href="#Page_100">p. 100</a>.—The reference here is to Lord Bute, -whose influence with the King had secured the overthrow of -Pitt’s ministry in 1761. Bute was a politician whose chief -power was in his gifts for intrigue. Though for these very -qualities he was liked by the King, he was detested by the -people,—as Macaulay says,—“by many as a Tory, by many -as a favorite, and by many as a Scot.” For a long time it -was not prudent for him to appear in the streets without disguising -himself. The populace were in the habit of representing -him by “a jackboot, generally accompanied by a petticoat.” -This they paraded as a contemptuous pun on his -name, and ended by fastening it on the gallows or committing -it to the flames. Pitt had been charged with prejudice against -Bute on account of his being a Scotchman. It was to refute -this charge that he alludes to his having been the first to employ -the Scotch Highlanders.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_28" href="#FNanchor_28" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 28</span></a>, <a href="#Page_104">p. 104</a>.—This whole passage may well be compared -with that on the same subject in Lord Mansfield’s -speech on <a href="#Page_150">p. 150</a>. Compare also the argument of Burke on -American Taxation.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_29" href="#FNanchor_29" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 29</span></a>, <a href="#Page_105">p. 105</a>.—This is believed to be the first reference -made in Parliament to the necessity of legislative reform. -The younger Pitt advocated a reform during the early years -of his career; but the horrors of the French Revolution so -shocked public opinion, that no change for the better could be -made until the Ministry of Earl Grey in 1832.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_308">308</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_30" href="#FNanchor_30" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 30</span></a>, <a href="#Page_110">p. 110</a>.—It was not until the reign of Henry VIII. -that the right of representation in Parliament was extended to -Wales, and the counties of Chester and Monmouth. To the -county of Durham the right was not given till 1673. Until -these counties were represented, they were not directly taxed -except for purely local purposes.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_31" href="#FNanchor_31" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 31</span></a>, <a href="#Page_114">p. 114</a>.—One of the speakers, Mr. Nugent, had -said that “a pepper-corn, in acknowledgment of the right to -tax America, was of more value than millions without it.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_32" href="#FNanchor_32" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 32</span></a>, <a href="#Page_126">p. 126</a>.—The capitulation of Burgoyne’s army -took place October 17, 1777, just one month before the delivery -of Chatham’s speech. There was still much doubt in -England in regard to the magnitude of the disaster.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_33" href="#FNanchor_33" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 33</span></a>, <a href="#Page_132">p. 132</a>.—Negotiations had been going on between -the colonies and France for more than a year, though this fact, -of course, was not known in England. Silas Deane had been -appointed Commissioner to France even before the Declaration -of Independence. In Nov. of 1776, Lee and Franklin were -appointed by Congress to negotiate a treaty of friendship and -commerce with the French king. But the French were wary -of alliance, though they were willing to wink at the secret arrangements -by which supplies were furnished by Beaumarchais. -These supplies, furnished in the autumn of 1777, were detained, -and did not reach America in time to prevent the -terrible sufferings at Valley Forge in the following winter. -When news of Burgoyne’s surrender reached France, the -French Government no longer hesitated, and a final treaty by -which France acknowledged the Independence of the United -States was signed on the 6th of February, 1778. For most -interesting and authentic details, see Parton’s “Life of Franklin,” -vol. ii., ch. vii.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_309">309</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_34" href="#FNanchor_34" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 34</span></a>, <a href="#Page_140">p. 140</a>.—The walls of the old room in which the -House of Lords assembled were covered with tapestries, one -of which represented the English fleet led out to conflict with -the Spanish Armada by Lord Effingham Howard, an ancestor -of Lord Suffolk.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_35" href="#FNanchor_35" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 35</span></a>, <a href="#Page_160">p. 160</a>.—This argument of Mansfield drawn from -the Navigation Acts is fully refuted by Burke in his speech -on “American Taxation.” Burke takes the ground that -none of these acts were passed for the sake of revenue, but -that all of them were designed simply to give direction to -trade. He also shows that there is a marked distinction between -<em>external</em> and <em>internal</em> taxation. The whole of Burke’s -speech may well be read with profit in connection with that -of Mansfield.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_36" href="#FNanchor_36" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 36</span></a>, <a href="#Page_164">p. 164</a>.—This reference is probably to James Otis’ -volume published in London in 1765, entitled: “The Rights of -the Colonies Asserted and Proved.” It had previously been -published in Boston, after having been read in MS. in the Massachusetts -House of Representatives. The instructions of May, -1764, contained in the appendix were drawn up by Samuel -Adams. It is possible, however, that the orator referred to -Otis’ “Vindication of the Conduct of the House of Representatives -of the Province of Mass. Bay,” which had appeared in -1762, and which contained in a nutshell the whole American -cause. John Adams said of it: “Look over the Declarations -of Rights and Wrongs issued by Congress in 1774; look into -the Declaration of Independence of 1776; look into the writings -of Dr. Price and Dr. Priestley. Look into all the French -Constitutions of Government; and, to cap the climax, look into -Mr. Thomas Paine’s ‘Common Sense,’ ‘Crisis,’ and ‘Rights -of Man,’ and what can you find that is not to be found in this -Vindication of the House of Representatives?” During the -same year also, Otis published “A Vindication of the British -Colonies,” and “Considerations on behalf of the Colonists, -in a letter to a Noble Lord.” The London reprint of the -“Vindication of the British Colonies” was accompanied with -the statement: “This tract is republished, <em>not for any excellence -of the work, but for the eminence of the author</em>.” We -see here the leader in the American disputes declaring the -universal opinion of the Colonies against the authority of -the British Parliament.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_310">310</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_37" href="#FNanchor_37" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 37</span></a>, <a href="#Page_185">p. 185</a>.—This exordium is almost bad enough to -justify Hazlitt’s remark: “Most of his speeches have a sort of -parliamentary preamble to them; there is an air of affected -modesty and ostentatious trifling in them; he seems fond of -coquetting with the House of Commons, and is perpetually -calling the Speaker out to dance a minuet with him before he -begins.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_38" href="#FNanchor_38" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 38</span></a>, <a href="#Page_185">p. 185</a>.—This was an Act to restrain the Commerce -of the Provinces of New England, and to confine it to Great -Britain, Ireland, and the British West Indies.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_39" href="#FNanchor_39" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 39</span></a>, <a href="#Page_187">p. 187</a>.—Reference is made to the Repeal of the -Stamp Act, which took place in Rockingham’s Administration -by a vote of 275 to 161.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_40" href="#FNanchor_40" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 40</span></a>, <a href="#Page_189">p. 189</a>.—This rather striking thought was firmly -implanted in Burke’s mind. In his paper on “Present Discontent,” -he apologized for “stepping a little out of the -ordinary sphere” of private people. In one of his letters he -says: “We live in a nation where, at present, there is scarce -a single head that does not teem with politics. Every man -has contrived a scheme of government for the benefit of his -fellow-subjects.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_41" href="#FNanchor_41" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 41</span></a>, <a href="#Page_191">p. 191</a>.—It must be confessed this is a little -pompous. Burke’s scheme was simply to yield to the colonies -what they claimed, and it was not good policy to pronounce -such an encomium on it in advance. There were those who -said: “On this simple principle of granting every thing required, -and stipulating for nothing in return, we can terminate -every difference throughout the world.”</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_311">311</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_42" href="#FNanchor_42" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 42</span></a>, <a href="#Page_191">p. 191</a>.—The Congress of Philadelphia in 1774 -declared that after the Repeal of the Stamp Act the colonies -“fell into their ancient state of unsuspecting confidence in the -mother country.” Burke comments on this statement in his -letter to the Sheriffs of Bristol in 1777.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_43" href="#FNanchor_43" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 43</span></a>, <a href="#Page_192">p. 192</a>.—Lord North’s plan of conciliation, already -described in the introduction to this speech.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_44" href="#FNanchor_44" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 44</span></a>, <a href="#Page_193">p. 193</a>.—The address to the King declaring that -rebellion existed in Massachusetts, requesting the King to take -energetic measures to suppress it, and pledging the coöperation -of Parliament.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_45" href="#FNanchor_45" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 45</span></a>, <a href="#Page_196">p. 196</a>.—The computation carefully made by -Mr. Bancroft (“Hist.,” 8vo ed., vol. iv., p. 128) more than -justifies Burke’s figures. Bancroft gives the following: -</p> - -<table id="pop" summary="American colonial population"> - <tr><th class="nobdr"> </th><th>White.</th><th>Black.</th><th>Total.</th></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1750</td> - <td class="tdc">1,040,000</td> - <td class="tdc">220,000</td> - <td class="tdc">1,260,000</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1754</td> - <td class="tdc">1,165,000</td> - <td class="tdc">260,000</td> - <td class="tdc">1,425,000</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1760</td> - <td class="tdc">1,385,000</td> - <td class="tdc">310,000</td> - <td class="tdc">1,695,000</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1770</td> - <td class="tdc">1,850,000</td> - <td class="tdc">462,000</td> - <td class="tdc">2,312,000</td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="tdl">1780</td> - <td class="tdc">2,383,000</td> - <td class="tdc">562,000</td> - <td class="tdc">2,945,000</td></tr> - <tr class="bot"> - <td class="tdl">1790</td> - <td class="tdc">3,177,257</td> - <td class="tdc">752,069</td> - <td class="tdc">3,927,326</td></tr> -</table> - -<p class="in0"> -See Johnson’s “Taxation no Tyranny” (Works, x., 96) in -which he savagely speaks of “3,000,000 Whigs, fierce for -liberty, which multiply with the fecundity of their own -rattlesnakes.” He thought the eggs should be destroyed.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_46" href="#FNanchor_46" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 46</span></a>, <a href="#Page_197">p. 197</a>.—Reference to the legal maxim, “<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">De -minimis non jurat lex</i>.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_47" href="#FNanchor_47" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 47</span></a>, <a href="#Page_198">p. 198</a>.—Mr. Glover who appeared at the bar to -support a petition of the West Indian planters praying that -peace might be concluded with the colonies.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_48" href="#FNanchor_48" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 48</span></a>, <a href="#Page_199">p. 199</a>.—Davenant afterward published a somewhat -important work entitled “Discourses on Revenue and -Trade,” and it was probably the MS. of this to which Burke -referred.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_312">312</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_49" href="#FNanchor_49" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 49</span></a>, <a href="#Page_202">p. 202</a>.—Burke’s reasoning has been more than -justified by subsequent history. Cobden: “Writings,” i., 98, -more than fifty years after Burke spoke, declared: “The -people of the United States constitute our largest and most -valuable connection. The business we carry on with them -is nearly twice as extensive as that with any other people.” -The American official returns since 1850 show that more than -one third of the imports came from England, and that more -than one half of the exports go to England.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_50" href="#FNanchor_50" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 50</span></a>, <a href="#Page_202">p. 202</a>.—A curious adaptation from Virgil. Ecl. -iv., 26. If, while he was changing <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">parentis</i> to <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">parentum</i> -he had omitted <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">poterit</i>, he would at least have left a -good Latin sentence. But Burke quoted from memory -and was often inexact, not only in the choice of words, -but also in pronunciation. Harford relates that he was -once indulging in some very severe animadversions on Lord -North’s management of the public purse. While this philippic -was going on, North appeared to be half-asleep, -“heaving backward and forward like a great turtle.” Burke -introduced the aphorism: <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">magnum vectígal est parsimonia</i>, -putting a wrong accent on the second word and calling it -<em>véctigal</em>. The scholarly ear of North was sufficiently attentive -to catch the mistake, and he shouted out <em>vectígal</em>. “I thank -the noble lord,” responded Burke, “for the correction, more -particularly as it gives me the opportunity to repeat what he -greatly needs to have reiterated upon him.” He then thundered -out: “<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Magnum vectígal est parsimonia</i>.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_51" href="#FNanchor_51" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 51</span></a>, <a href="#Page_206">p. 206</a>.—In allusion to the well-known story told -at length by Valerius Maximus, lib. v., 7; and in briefer -form by Pliny, “Nat. Hist.,” vii., 36.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_52" href="#FNanchor_52" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 52</span></a>, <a href="#Page_208">p. 208</a>.—The whole of this magnificent passage -was founded upon very substantial facts. Massachusetts -had 183 vessels, carrying 13,820 tons in the North, and 120 -vessels, carrying 14,026 tons in the South. It was in 1775, -the very year of Burke’s speech, that English ships were -first fitted out to follow the Americans into the fisheries of -the South Seas. See <cite>Quarterly Review</cite>, lxiii., 318.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_313">313</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_53" href="#FNanchor_53" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 53</span></a>, <a href="#Page_211">p. 211</a>.—At the time of the great struggle against -the Stuarts. In the <cite>Annual Register</cite>, for 1775, p. 14, Burke -says: “The American freeholders at present are nearly, in -point of condition, what the English yeomen were of old when -they rendered us formidable to all Europe, and our name celebrated -throughout the world. The former, from many obvious -circumstances, are more enthusiastical lovers of liberty -than even our yeomen were.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_54" href="#FNanchor_54" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 54</span></a>, <a href="#Page_213">p. 213</a>.—The differences here indicated are fully -explained in Marshall’s “American Colonies,” Story “On -the Constitution,” Lodge’s “English Colonies in America,” -and more briefly in vol. iv., chap, vi., of Bancroft. It is -noteworthy that it was not in the most democratic forms of -government that the most violent resolutions were passed. -See <cite>Ann. Reg.</cite> for 1775, p. 6.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_55" href="#FNanchor_55" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 55</span></a>, <a href="#Page_218">p. 218</a>.—General Gage had prohibited the <em>calling</em> -of town meetings after August 1, 1774. The meetings held -before August 1st were adjourned over from time to time, and -consequently there was no need of “<em>calling</em>” meetings. Gage -complained that by such means they could keep their meetings -alive for ten years. See Bancroft, vii., chap. viii., and -<cite>Ann. Reg.</cite>, 1775, p. 11.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_56" href="#FNanchor_56" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 56</span></a>, <a href="#Page_219">p. 219</a>.—The “<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">ministrum fulminis alitem</i>” of -Horace, bk. iv., ode i.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_57" href="#FNanchor_57" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 57</span></a>, <a href="#Page_227">p. 227</a>.—In 1766, Lieutenant-Governor Fauquier -had written to the Lords in Trade: “In disobedience to all -proclamations, in defiance of law, and without the least shadow -of right to claim or defend their property, people are daily -going out to settle beyond the Alleghany Mountains.” -Migration hither was prohibited. “But the prohibition only -set apart the Great Valley as the sanctuary of the unhappy, -the adventurous, and the free; of those whom enterprise, or -curiosity, or disgust at the forms of life in the old plantations -raised above royal edicts.” Bancroft, vi., 33.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_314">314</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_58" href="#FNanchor_58" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 58</span></a>, <a href="#Page_233">p. 233</a>.—Reference is made to the brutal attack of -Sir Edward Coke upon Sir Walter Raleigh, the details of -which are given in Howell’s “State Trials,” ii., 7.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_59" href="#FNanchor_59" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 59</span></a>, <a href="#Page_240">p. 240</a>.—Milton’s “Paradise Lost,” ii., 594.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_60" href="#FNanchor_60" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 60</span></a>, <a href="#Page_240">p. 240</a>.—This passage has been much admired -for the skill with which Burke excludes the general question of -the right of taxation, and confines himself to the expediency -of particular methods. But this was in accordance with all of -Burke’s political philosophy. In his “Appeal from the Old to -the New Whigs,” he announces the principle which governs him -in all such cases: “Nothing universal can be rationally affirmed -on any moral or any political subject. Pure metaphysical -abstraction does not belong to these matters. The lines of -morality are not like ideal lines of mathematics. They are -broad and deep as well as long. They admit of exceptions; -they demand modifications. These exceptions and modifications -are not made by the process of logic, but by the rules of -prudence. <em>Prudence is not only the first in rank of the virtues -political and moral, but she is the director, the regulator, the -standard of them all.</em>”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_61" href="#FNanchor_61" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 61</span></a>, <a href="#Page_244">p. 244</a>.—The pamphlet from which Lord North -“seems to have borrowed these ideas,” was by Dean Tucker, -a work to which, Dr. Johnson in “Taxation no Tyranny,” -(Works, x., 139) pays his respects, and which Burke had alluded -to in no very complimentary terms in his speech on “American -Taxation.” But Mr. Forster, in his “Life of Goldsmith,” -i., 412, speaks of Tucker as “the only man of that day who -thoroughly anticipated the judgment and experience of our -own on the question of the American colonies.” The fact is -that Tucker was a “free trader,” and was in favor of the -establishment of complete freedom of trade, as the best that -could possibly be done with the colonies. To an account of -Dean Tucker’s pamphlets several interesting pages are given -in Smyth’s “Modern History,” Lecture xxxii., Am. ed., p. -571, <i>seq.</i></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_315">315</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_62" href="#FNanchor_62" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 62</span></a>, <a href="#Page_248">p. 248</a>.—The English settlers in Ireland were -obliged to keep themselves within certain boundaries known as -“The Pale.” They were distinct from the Irish, and were governed -by English lords. By an act in the time of James I., the -privileges of the Pale were first extended to the rest of Ireland.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_63" href="#FNanchor_63" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 63</span></a>, <a href="#Page_249">p. 249</a>.—In 1612, Sir John Davis, who had been -much in Ireland, and knew Irish affairs better than any other -person in his time, published a book entitled: “Discoverie -of the true Causes why Ireland was never entirely subdued -until the beginning of his Majestie’s happy reign.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_64" href="#FNanchor_64" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 64</span></a>, <a href="#Page_250">p. 250</a>.—Under Henry III., Wales was ruled by -its own Prince Llewellen, who secured the assistance of -Henry against a rebellious son, and as a reward acknowledged -fealty as a vassal. It was not till Edward I., that the conquest -was completed. O’Connell once said: “Wales was once -the Ireland of the English Government,” and then proceeded -to apply to Ireland what Burke here says of Wales.—“O’Connell’s -speech of Aug. 30, 1826.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_65" href="#FNanchor_65" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 65</span></a>, <a href="#Page_252">p. 252</a>.—When the reduction to order of Wales -was found impossible by ordinary means, the English King -granted to the Lords Marchers “such lands as they could win -from the Welshmen.” On these lands the lords were allowed -“to take upon themselves such prerogative and authority as -were fit for the quiet government of the country.” About the -castles of the Lords Marchers grew up the towns of Wales. -Within their domains they exercised English laws; but on the -unconquered lands the old Welsh laws still prevailed. The -courts, therefore, had to administer both forms of law, and -there was consequently great confusion even in the most peaceful -times. There were fifteen acts of penal regulation, providing -that no Welshman should be allowed to become a -burgess, or purchase any land in town. Henry IV., ii., -chaps. xii.-xx. In the time of Edward I., the special privileges -of the Lords Marchers were swept away. See Stubbs’ “Con. -Hist.,” 8vo ed., i., 514–520, and ii., 117–137; Scott’s “Betrothed,” -and the Appendix to Pennant’s “Tour in Wales.”</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_316">316</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_66" href="#FNanchor_66" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 66</span></a>, <a href="#Page_254">p. 254</a>.—Horace, “Odes,” bk. i., 12, 27. The -allusion is to the deification of Augustus and the superintending -influence of Castor and Pollux. The passage was -translated by Gifford thus: -</p> - -<div class="poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i2">“When their auspicious star<br /></span> -<span class="i2">To the sailor shines afar,<br /></span> -<span class="i0">The troubled waters leave the rocks at rest;<br /></span> -<span class="i2">The clouds are gone, the winds are still,<br /></span> -<span class="i2">The angry wave obeys their will,<br /></span> -<span class="i0">And calmly sleeps upon the ocean’s breast.”<br /></span> -</div></div> -</div> -</div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_67" href="#FNanchor_67" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 67</span></a>, <a href="#Page_258">p. 258</a>.—Milton’s “Comus,” l. 633, not quite -correctly quoted.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_68" href="#FNanchor_68" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 68</span></a>, <a href="#Page_261">p. 261</a>.—Horace, “Satir.,” ii., 2. “The precept -is not mine. Ofellus gave it in his rustic strain irregular, -but wise.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_69" href="#FNanchor_69" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 69</span></a>, <a href="#Page_261">p. 261</a>.—In allusion to the declaration in Exodus -xx., 25: “If thou lift up thy tool upon it [the altar] thou hast -polluted it.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_70" href="#FNanchor_70" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 70</span></a>, <a href="#Page_265">p. 265</a>.—In allusion to a statement that had -been made by Grenville. Burke said in his speech on American -taxation: “He has declared in this House an hundred -times, that the colonies could not legally grant any revenues -to the Crown.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_71" href="#FNanchor_71" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 71</span></a>, <a href="#Page_278">p. 278</a>.—This was in strict accordance with Burke’s -political philosophy. In a letter to the Sheriff of Bristol, he -wrote: “Of one thing I am perfectly clear, that it is not by -deciding the suit, but by compromising the difference, that -peace can be restored or kept.”</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_317">317</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_72" href="#FNanchor_72" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 72</span></a>, <a href="#Page_278">p. 278</a>.—Shak.: “Othello,” Act iii., Scene v. So -at the beginning of his paper on the “Present Discontents,” -Burke speaks of “reputation, the most precious possession of -every individual.” In the fourth letter on a “Regicide Peace,” -he said: “Our ruin will be disguised in profit, and the sale of -a few wretched baubles will bribe a degenerate people to barter -away the most precious jewel of their souls.”</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_73" href="#FNanchor_73" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 73</span></a>, <a href="#Page_279">p. 279</a>.—“I drew them with cords of a man, with -bands of love.”—<span class="smcap">Hosea</span>, xi., 4.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_74" href="#FNanchor_74" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 74</span></a>, <a href="#Page_279">p. 279</a>.—Another illustration of Burke’s habit of -making use of the inestimable maxims of the great Greek -politician.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_75" href="#FNanchor_75" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 75</span></a>, <a href="#Page_282">p. 282</a>.—“Experiment upon a worthless subject” -was a maxim among old scientific inquirers.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_76" href="#FNanchor_76" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 76</span></a>, <a href="#Page_286">p. 286</a>.—A “Treasury Extent” was a writ of -Commission for valuing lands and tenements for satisfying a -Crown debt.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_77" href="#FNanchor_77" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 77</span></a>, <a href="#Page_289">p. 289</a>.—The quotation is from Juvenal i., l. 90, -and refers to the habit of the Roman gambler. Gifford renders -the passage: -</p> - -<div class="poem-container"> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="iq">“For now no more the pocket’s stores supply<br /></span> -<span class="i0">The boundless charges of the desperate die,<br /></span> -<span class="i0"><em>The chest itself is staked</em>.”<br /></span> -</div></div> -</div> -</div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_78" href="#FNanchor_78" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 78</span></a>, <a href="#Page_291">p. 291</a>.—Milton’s Paradise Lost, iv., 106. This -also is a misquotation:—<em>retract</em> should be <em>recant</em>. Burke seldom -took the trouble to verify his quotations, but relied upon -a powerful, though slightly fallible, memory.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_79" href="#FNanchor_79" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 79</span></a>, <a href="#Page_294">p. 294</a>.—This passage is perhaps one of the noblest -and most characteristic of all Burke’s utterances. And -yet, in all its magnificence it shows how largely the orator was -indebted to his reading. Mr. E. J. Payne, as an illustration -of the way in which Burke “repays his rich thievery of the -Bible and the English poets,” has pointed out the sources from -which the most striking expressions were consciously or unconsciously -derived. The closing sentence in an adaptation from -Virgil, Æn. vi., 726; “My trust is in her,” is from the Psalms; -“Light as air,” etc., from Othello; “Grapple to you,” from -Hamlet; “No force under heaven,” etc., from St. Paul; -“Chosen race,” Tate & Brady; “Perfect obedience” and -“mysterious whole,” from Pope. Most striking of all, the -passage in which “the chosen race” is represented “turning -their faces towards you,” is from 1. Kings, viii., 44–45. “If -the people go out to battle, or whithersoever thou shall send -them, and shall pray unto the Lord toward the city, which -thou hast chosen, and toward the house that I have built in thy -name, then hear thou in heaven their prayer and their supplication, -and maintain their cause.”</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_318">318</span></p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_80" href="#FNanchor_80" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 80</span></a>, <a href="#Page_295">p. 295</a>.—Until 1798 the Land Tax yielded from -one third to one half of all the revenue; but in that year it was -made permanent, and now yields only about one sixty-fourth.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_81" href="#FNanchor_81" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 81</span></a>, <a href="#Page_295">p. 295</a>.—The Mutiny Bill plays a very curious part -in English Constitutional usage. In the Declaration of Rights -it was declared that “standing armies and martial law in peace, -without the consent of Parliament, are illegal.” The “consent -of Parliament” is now secured in the following manner: An -appropriation is made to support such an army as is needed, -but all of the provisions of the appropriating bill are limited -<em>to one year</em>. In order to maintain even the nucleus of an army, -therefore, it is absolutely necessary that Parliament should be in -session every year. This is the only provision guaranteeing an -annual assembling of Parliament.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_82" href="#FNanchor_82" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 82</span></a>, <a href="#Page_296">p. 296</a>.—<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Sursum Corda</i>: “let your hearts arise,” -was the form of a call to silent prayer at certain intervals in the -Roman Catholic service.</p></div> - -<div class="footnote"> - -<p><a id="Footnote_83" href="#FNanchor_83" class="fnanchor"><span class="smcap">Note 83</span></a>, <a href="#Page_296">p. 296</a>.—<em>Let it be happy and prosperous</em>, was a -form of prayer among the Romans at the beginning of an important -undertaking.</p></div> -</div></div> - -<div class="chapter"><div class="transnote"> -<h2 id="Transcribers_Notes" class="nobreak p1">Transcriber’s Notes</h2> - -<p>Punctuation and spelling were made consistent when a predominant -preference was found in this book; otherwise they were not changed.</p> - -<p>Simple typographical errors were corrected; occasional unbalanced -quotation marks retained.</p> - -<p>Ambiguous hyphens at the ends of lines were retained; occurrences -of inconsistent hyphenation have not been changed.</p> -</div></div> - - - - - - - - -<pre> - - - - - -End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Representative British Orations with -Introductions and Explanatory Notes,, by Charles Kendall Adams - -*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK REPRESENTATIVE BRITISH ORATIONS, VOL 1 *** - -***** This file should be named 55489-h.htm or 55489-h.zip ***** -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: - http://www.gutenberg.org/5/5/4/8/55489/ - -Produced by Larry B. Harrison, Charlie Howard, and the -Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net -(This file was produced from images generously made -available by The Internet Archive) - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will -be renamed. - -Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright -law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, -so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United -States without permission and without paying copyright -royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part -of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm -concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, -and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive -specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this -eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook -for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, -performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given -away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks -not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the -trademark license, especially commercial redistribution. - -START: FULL LICENSE - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full -Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at -www.gutenberg.org/license. - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or -destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your -possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a -Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound -by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the -person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph -1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this -agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the -Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection -of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual -works in the collection are in the public domain in the United -States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the -United States and you are located in the United States, we do not -claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, -displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as -all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope -that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting -free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm -works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the -Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily -comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the -same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when -you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are -in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, -check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this -agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, -distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any -other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no -representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any -country outside the United States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other -immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear -prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work -on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, -performed, viewed, copied or distributed: - - This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and - most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no - restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it - under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this - eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the - United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you - are located before using this ebook. - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is -derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not -contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the -copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in -the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are -redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply -either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or -obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm -trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any -additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms -will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works -posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the -beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including -any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access -to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format -other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official -version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site -(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense -to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means -of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain -Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the -full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -provided that - -* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed - to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has - agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid - within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are - legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty - payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project - Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in - Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg - Literary Archive Foundation." - -* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all - copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue - all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm - works. - -* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of - any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of - receipt of the work. - -* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than -are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing -from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The -Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm -trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project -Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may -contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate -or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other -intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or -other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or -cannot be read by your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium -with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you -with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in -lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person -or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second -opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If -the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing -without further opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO -OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT -LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of -damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement -violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the -agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or -limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or -unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the -remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in -accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the -production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, -including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of -the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this -or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or -additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any -Defect you cause. - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of -computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It -exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations -from people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future -generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see -Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at -www.gutenberg.org - - - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by -U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the -mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its -volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous -locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt -Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to -date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and -official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -For additional contact information: - - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND -DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular -state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To -donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project -Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be -freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and -distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of -volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in -the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not -necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper -edition. - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search -facility: www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. - - - -</pre> - -</body> -</html> |