summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/55158-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/55158-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/55158-0.txt8923
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 8923 deletions
diff --git a/old/55158-0.txt b/old/55158-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index aed7dee..0000000
--- a/old/55158-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,8923 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Chautauquan, Vol. 04, May 1884, No. 8, by
-The Chautauquan Literary and Scientific Circle
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
-other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
-the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
-to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
-
-Title: The Chautauquan, Vol. 04, May 1884, No. 8
-
-Author: The Chautauquan Literary and Scientific Circle
-
-Editor: Theodore L. Flood
-
-Release Date: July 20, 2017 [EBook #55158]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE CHAUTAUQUAN, MAY 1884 ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Emmy, Juliet Sutherland and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
- _A MONTHLY MAGAZINE DEVOTED TO THE PROMOTION OF TRUE CULTURE.
- ORGAN OF THE CHAUTAUQUA LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC CIRCLE._
-
- VOL. IV. MAY, 1884. No. 8.
-
-
-
-
-Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle.
-
-
-_President_—Lewis Miller, Akron, Ohio.
-
-_Superintendent of Instruction_—Rev. J. H. Vincent, D.D., New Haven, Conn.
-
-_Counselors_—Rev. Lyman Abbott, D.D.; Rev. J. M. Gibson, D.D.; Bishop H.
-W. Warren, D.D.; Prof. W. C. Wilkinson, D.D.
-
-_Office Secretary_—Miss Kate F. Kimball, Plainfield, N. J.
-
-_General Secretary_—Albert M. Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa.
-
-
-
-
-Contents
-
-Transcriber’s Note: This table of contents of this periodical was created
-for the HTML version to aid the reader.
-
- REQUIRED READING
- Readings from Roman History 437
- Commercial Law
- IV.—Real Estate 439
- Sunday Readings
- [_May 4_] 440
- [_May 11_] 441
- [_May 18_] 441
- [_May 25_] 442
- Readings in Art
- II.—The Painters and Paintings of Northern Europe 442
- Selections from American Literature
- Thomas Bailey Aldrich 446
- Bayard Taylor 446
- Celia Thaxter 447
- United States History 448
- The Divine Sculptor 451
- Reminiscences of Wendell Phillips 451
- Hesitation and Errors in Speech 454
- Astronomy of the Heavens for May 455
- The Amusements of the London Poor 457
- The Dead-Letter Office 460
- Agassiz 462
- Trained Nurses 466
- Eight Centuries with Walter Scott 467
- A Private Charity of Paris 471
- Self-Dependence 472
- Duties of Women as Mistresses of Households 473
- Military Prisoners and Prisons 475
- C. L. S. C. Work 477
- The Chautauqua University 478
- Outline of C. L. S. C. Readings 478
- Local Circles 478
- The C. L. S. C. in Canada 481
- Questions and Answers 482
- Chautauqua Normal Course 484
- Editor’s Outlook 485
- Editor’s Note-Book 488
- C. L. S. C. Notes on Required Readings for May 491
- Notes on Required Readings in “The Chautauquan” 494
- Talk About Books 495
-
-
-
-
-REQUIRED READING
-
-FOR THE
-
-_Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle for 1883-4_.
-
-MAY.
-
-
-
-
-READINGS FROM ROMAN HISTORY.
-
-SELECTED BY WILLIAM CLEAVER WILKINSON.
-
-It has not been the compiler’s purpose in these extracts to produce a
-continuous sketch of the history of Rome. That, in the space assigned,
-would be impossible. It has not been his purpose to present to readers
-incidents or events in Roman story judged to be the most important
-or the most striking of all that were open to his choice. That, too,
-would require more room than could here be commanded. His purpose has
-been simply, from the long historic panorama of Rome, to cut out a few
-pictures, at the same time interesting enough, compact enough, and
-complete enough within themselves, to deserve and to admit being shown to
-readers of THE CHAUTAUQUAN, in the comparatively small space that could
-be allotted to them in these columns.
-
-We begin with a tale taken from the legendary part of Roman history.
-Livy tells it for us, Mr. George Baker being his English interpreter, a
-practical one and excellent. A war is in progress between the Romans and
-the Albans.
-
-
-THE LEGEND OF THE HORATII AND THE CURIATII.
-
-[_No date assignable._]
-
-It happened that, in each of the armies, there were three twin brothers,
-between whom there was no disparity, in point of age, or of strength.
-That their names were Horatius and Curiatius, we have sufficient
-certainty, for no occurrence of antiquity has ever been more universally
-noticed; yet, notwithstanding that the fact is so well ascertained, there
-still remains a doubt respecting the names, to which nation the Horatii
-belonged, and to which the Curiatii; authors are divided on the point;
-finding, however, that the greater number concur in calling the Horatii
-Romans, I am inclined to follow them. To these three brothers, on each
-side, the kings proposed that they should support, by their arms, the
-honor of their respective countries, informing them that the sovereignty
-was to be enjoyed by that nation whose champions should prove victorious
-in the combat. No reluctance was shown on their parts, and time and
-place were appointed. Previous to the fight a league was made between
-the Romans and Albans, on these conditions: That, whichever of the two
-nations should, by its champions, obtain victory in the combat, that
-nation should, without further dispute, possess sovereign dominion over
-the other.
-
- * * * * *
-
-The league being concluded, the three brothers, on each side, pursuant
-to the agreement, took arms, the friends of each putting them in mind
-that “the gods of their country, the country itself, the whole of their
-countrymen, whether at home or in the army, rested on their prowess
-the decision of their fate.” Naturally bold and courageous, and highly
-animated, beside, by such exhortations, they advanced into the midst,
-between the two armies. The two armies sat down before their respective
-camps, free from all apprehensions of immediate danger to themselves, but
-not from deep anxiety, no less than sovereign power being at stake, and
-depending on the bravery and success of so small a number. With all the
-eagerness, therefore, of anxious suspense, they fixed their attention
-on an exhibition which was far, indeed, from being a matter of mere
-amusement. The signal being given, the three youths, who had been drawn
-upon each side, as in battle array, their breasts animated with the
-magnanimous spirits of whole armies, rushed forward to the fight, intent
-on mutual slaughter, utterly thoughtless of their own personal peril,
-and reflecting that, on the event of the contest, depended the future
-fate and fortune of their respective countries. On the first onset, as
-soon as the clash of their arms and the glittering of their swords were
-perceived, the spectators shuddered with excess of horror, and their
-hopes being, as yet, equally balanced, their voices were suppressed,
-and even their breath was suspended. Afterward, in the progress of the
-combat, during which not only the activity of the young men’s limbs, and
-the rapid motions of their arms, offensive and defensive, but wounds
-also, and blood, were exhibited to view, the three Albans were wounded,
-and two of the Romans fell lifeless, one over the other. On their fall
-the Alban army set up a shout of joy, while the Roman legions were in a
-state of the most painful anxiety, almost bereft of hope, and reduced
-to a state of despair by the situation of their champion, who was now
-surrounded by the three Curiatii. It happened that he was unhurt, so
-that, though singly he was by no means a match for them altogether,
-yet was he confident of success against each of them, separately. In
-order, therefore, to avoid their joint attack, he betook himself to
-flight, judging that they would pursue with such different degrees of
-speed as their wounds would allow. He had now fled to some distance
-from the place where they had fought, when, looking back, he perceived
-that there were large intervals between the pursuers, and that one was
-at no great distance from him; against him he turned back, with great
-fury, and while the Alban army called out to the Curiatii to succor
-their brother, Horatius having in the meantime slain his antagonist,
-proceeded, victorious, to attack the second. The Romans then cheered
-their champion with shouts of applause, such as naturally burst forth
-on occasions of unexpected joy; on his part, he delayed not to put an
-end to the combat; for, before the third, who was at no great distance,
-could come up to the relief of his brother, he dispatched the second
-Curiatius. And now they were brought to an equality, in point of number,
-only one on each side surviving, but were far from an equality either in
-hopes or in strength; the one, unhurt, and flushed with two victories,
-advanced with confidence to the third contest; the other, enfeebled by a
-wound, fatigued with running, and dispirited, beside, by the fate of his
-brethren already slain, met the victorious enemy. What followed could
-not be called a fight; the Roman, exulting, cried out: “Two of you have
-I offered to the shades of my brothers, the third I will offer to the
-cause in which we are engaged, that the Roman may rule over the Alban;”
-and, whilst the other could scarcely support the weight of his armor, he
-plunged his sword downward into his throat; then as he lay prostrate, he
-despoiled him of his arms. The Romans received Horatius with triumphant
-congratulations, and a degree of joy proportioned to the greatness of
-the danger that had threatened their cause. Both parties then applied
-themselves to the burying of their dead, with very different dispositions
-of mind; the one being elated with the acquisition of empire, the other
-depressed under a foreign jurisdiction. The sepulchers still remain, in
-the several spots where the combatants fell: those of the two Romans in
-one place, nearer to Alba, those of the three Albans on the side next to
-Rome; but in different places, as they fought.
-
- * * * * *
-
- Do our readers wonder that Byron speaks of Livy’s “pictured
- page?” We advance immediately to the beginning of authentic
- Roman history—the date of the war between Pyrrhus and Rome. Our
- historian shall be the German, Wilhelm Ihne (pronounced Eé-nuh),
- who, however, writes himself directly in English. He is still
- later than Mommsen, and far more judicial than he.
-
-
-THE EMBASSY OF CINEAS TO ROME.
-
-[_About 280 B. C._]
-
-The embassy of Cineas to Rome was celebrated in antiquity and was a
-favorite topic for rhetorical declamation. It is said that he took with
-him beautiful presents for men and women, but offered them in vain.[A]
-Rome, which in a later time the Numidian king Jugurtha declared to be
-ready to sell itself if only a purchaser could be found, was still, as
-is related, pure and virtuous. It was the time of Manius Curius, the
-conqueror of the Samnites, who, sitting by his own hearth and eating
-his simple peasant’s food, had proudly rejected the tempting presents
-of the Samnites; it was the time when C. Cornelius Rufinus was cast out
-of the senate by the censors because he had silver plate to the weight
-of ten pounds in his use. And was not Fabricius, the first soldier and
-statesman of his time, a pattern of simplicity and contentment, and
-superior to all temptation? What a contrast to the mercenary Greeks,
-whose greatest patriots and statesmen were publicly accused of bribery,
-and were compelled to defend themselves against such charges before the
-public tribunals! But Cineas was a shrewd, experienced negotiator. Where
-one scheme failed, he tried another. He discovered the point where the
-stout Romans were vulnerable. He flattered their pride. On the second day
-after his arrival he knew the names of all the senators and knights, and
-had something obliging to say to each. He visited the influential men in
-their houses, to get them secretly to favor his propositions. At length,
-when he appeared in the senate and made known his commission, when he
-brought offers of peace and friendship from the powerful king of Epirus,
-the redoubted warrior, the victor of Heraclea, the senate wavered in
-its decision; the deliberations lasted many days, and it appeared that
-the advice of those would prevail whose courage was damped and whose
-confidence was small. At that critical moment, the blind Appius Claudius,
-bowed down with age and infirmity, appeared, supported by his sons, in
-the solemn assembly. He had for some years retired from public life, but
-his haughty temper could not brook the idea that Rome should accept
-laws from a foreign conqueror. The Claudian pride which animated him was
-the genuine Roman pride, the first national virtue. He summoned all his
-strength once more to raise his voice in that council which he had so
-often swayed by his wisdom, and had subdued by his indomitable will. As
-if from the grave, and as if inspired by the genius of a better time,
-his words, echoing in the ears of the breathless assembly, scared away
-all pusillanimous considerations and infused the spirit of resistance
-which animated the men of Rome when, from the height of the capitol,
-they beheld the Gaulish conquerors rioting in the ruins of their town.
-The speech of Appius Claudius was a monument of a glorious time, the
-contemplation of which warmed and inspired succeeding generations. It
-is the first speech of the contents of which there has been preserved
-a substantially correct report. Later generations believed they
-possessed even the exact words, and Cicero speaks of it as of a literary
-composition of acknowledged authenticity. This view is hardly tenable;
-but it may be believed that the general purport and some of the arguments
-of the speech were faithfully preserved in the Claudian family books, and
-we can not deny ourselves the pleasure of listening to the faint echo
-which introduces us for the first time into the immediate presence of the
-most august assembly of the old world.
-
-According to the tradition, Appius spoke something as follows: “Hitherto,
-assembled fathers, I used to mourn that I was deprived of the light of
-the eye; now, however, I should consider myself happy if, in addition
-to that, I had lost the sense of hearing, that I might not hear the
-disgraceful counsels which are here publicly proposed, to the shame of
-the Roman name. How are you changed from your former estate! Whither
-have your pride and your courage flown? You that boasted you would have
-opposed the great Alexander himself if, in the period of your youth, he
-had dared to invade Italy; that he would have lost in battle against
-you the fame of the invincible, and would have found defeat or death in
-Italy, to the glory of the Roman name—you now show that all this was
-nothing but vain boasting; for you fear now the Chaonians and Molossians,
-who have always been the spoil of the Macedonians, and you tremble
-before Pyrrhus, who passed his life in the service of one of Alexander’s
-satellites. Thus one single misfortune has made you forget what you once
-were. And you are going to make him who is the author of your shame
-your friend, together with those who brought him over to Italy. What
-your fathers won by the sword, you will deliver up to the Lucanians
-and the Bruttians. What is this but making yourselves servants of the
-Macedonians? And some of you are not ashamed to call that peace which is
-really slavery!”
-
-When Appius had spoken, the negotiations with Cineas were broken off. He
-was warned immediately to leave the town, and to inform his king that
-there could be no idea of peace and friendship between him and the Roman
-people until he had left the shores of Italy. That was the answer of a
-people conquered, but not broken in spirit; a people prepared to stand up
-for their honor and their greatness, even to the last man. The impression
-which the Romans made on Cineas is described as very powerful. It is said
-that he compared the town of Rome to a temple, and the senators to kings.
-Indeed, the dignity, the calmness, and firmness of the Roman people could
-not have failed to convince him that the Romans were barbarians of a
-peculiar type; although in refinement and polish, in art and the higher
-enjoyments of life below the Greeks, still as citizens and soldiers very
-superior to them. The day of Heraclea was far from damping their courage.
-A new army was formed in Rome, probably under Cineas’s own eyes, from
-volunteers, who, full of enthusiasm, poured thither from all parts to
-fill up the gaps.
-
- * * * * *
-
- Let Dr. Thomas Arnold be compared with Ihne, at this point of
- the history, and a curiously instinctive contradiction appears.
- Both historians refer, for their authority, to precisely the
- same passages in two different works by Cicero; but whereas Ihne,
- as our readers have seen, makes Cicero in them vouch for the
- authenticity of Appius Claudius’s speech, Arnold, on the other
- hand, makes him regard it as utterly unworthy of trust! But
- Arnold adds a comment that our readers will like to see.
-
-No Englishman can have read thus far without remembering the scene, in
-all points so similar, which took place within our fathers’ memory in
-our own House of Parliament. We recollect how the greatest of English
-statesmen, bowed down by years and infirmity, like Appius, but roused,
-like him, by the dread of approaching dishonor to the English name, was
-led by his son and son-in-law into the House of Lords, and all the peers
-with one impulse arose to receive him. We know the expiring words of that
-mighty voice, when he protested against the dismemberment of this ancient
-monarchy, and prayed that if England must fall, she might fall with
-honor. The real speech of Lord Chatham against yielding to the coalition
-of France and America, will give a far more lively image of what was said
-by the blind Appius in the Roman senate, than any fictitious oration
-which I could either copy from other writers or endeavor myself to
-invent; and those who would wish to know how Appius spoke, should read
-the dying words of the great orator of England.
-
-[A] Plutarch, Pyrrh, 18. According to Zonaras, however (viii:3), the
-attempts at corruption were not fruitless.
-
-
-
-
-COMMERCIAL LAW.
-
-By EDWARD C. REYNOLDS, ESQ.
-
-
-IV.—REAL ESTATE.
-
-How known? Unfortunately, this is not always easily determined, as much
-expensive litigation is continually demonstrating. There are two general
-divisions of property, which we designate as real and personal.
-
-Land is real property, or real estate. Stocks, lumber, evidences of debt,
-and all that property which is classed as movable is personal estate.
-Personal estate may become real estate. How? Take lumber, bricks, etc.,
-which are personal property, and therewith construct a house, and locate
-it, with stone or brick foundation, on your land. The personal property,
-so used, merges its lesser title in that of the greater, that of the land
-on which it is placed, and becomes with the land real estate, subject
-to real estate law as regards taxation, transfer, and in fact every
-essential feature. Whence comes the original ownership? First by right
-of discovery; next by royal grant, and by purchase, and then by descent
-and purchase. It is our purpose to consider this transfer by purchase.
-This being accomplished through the medium of a deed, we pass on to
-mention a few of its characteristics. This document is the evidence of
-a sale and conveyance of certain real estate, which should therein be
-accurately described. There is a recognized form of deed in general use,
-which although containing a few seeming superfluous words, according
-to the ideas of an occasional iconoclast, is yet safe; and this blank,
-which may be purchased of publishers, is the one to use. Lack of space
-will not permit an analysis of a deed, but we will endeavor to explain
-its execution. The deed must be signed by the party or parties making
-the sale; must be sealed, acknowledged, witnessed (this is not required
-in all the states, but is generally done), delivered and recorded.
-The deed should be written in ink. The writing should be plain, since
-it is written to be read, a fact sometimes seemingly overlooked. The
-description and all the clerical work should be completed and accurately
-completed before signing, since no change is legitimate, if made after
-signature has been attached. The witnesses should see the grantor sign
-his name, and then sign themselves. A corporation making a transfer does
-it by its president or treasurer, who signs in this way:
-
- Cimbrian Manufacturing Company,
- By James Felt,
- President.
-
-A seal (a small piece of paper attached as a wafer or sealing wax is
-ordinarily used) is placed opposite the signature of the grantor, or,
-if more than one name, a seal for each. After signing, sealing and
-witnessing, the deed must be “acknowledged.” For this purpose the grantor
-goes before a Justice of the Peace, or Notary Public, or, if the grantor
-is not resident in the state where the real estate is situated, then
-before a State Commissioner of Deeds, _or_ if in a foreign country, then
-before a consul. These are persons qualified by appointment to the office
-which they hold, to take acknowledgments. The deed is shown the officer,
-to whom grantor makes the acknowledgment that the document by him signed
-is his free act and deed; and by whom a certificate to that effect by
-him signed, is attached to the deed. The deed being duly executed is
-now delivered by the grantor to the grantee (this matter of delivery is
-essential), and is by him placed upon record.
-
-By record is meant this: Each county of the state has an office wherein
-are kept the records of all the real estate conveyances of that county,
-or of land situated in that county. This office opens its records to
-the inspection of the public, and by the records there each real estate
-owner’s title may be investigated. Between the parties to a transfer,
-the deed would be sufficient evidence of such passing of title without
-record, but wherever the rights of other parties might clash with such
-a change of ownership, record would be absolutely necessary for the
-protection of the grantee. Make it a rule, then, when right or title in
-or to real estate becomes vested in you by deed, to allow no great length
-of time to elapse before having records made. Since all titles are to
-be established in the Registry of Deeds, it is the privilege of any one
-purchasing, either to investigate the title to his proposed purchase
-himself, or have some one do it for him. Whenever one wishes an agent to
-make a transfer he must first authorize his agent, by giving him a power
-of attorney to attend to the execution of the deed, and this power of
-attorney must contain specific authority and plenary, and be executed
-with the formality of a deed, and be regularly recorded.
-
-On writing deeds remember:
-
-That the price paid is ordinarily stated in the deed. The exact amount
-need not be mentioned. It may read “In consideration of one dollar.” The
-amount named is not conclusive evidence of amount paid;
-
-That the description should be accurate. It is quite common to find very
-imperfect descriptions, but this is wrong, and is the cause of much
-trouble. In addition to description, refer to previous deeds, by giving
-book and page; wherein recorded in the Registry of Deeds;
-
-That a deed should describe the incumbrances, if any there be. If any
-such exist, and the deed is silent regarding them, the grantor is selling
-that which does not belong to him, a species of business activity which
-the law does not encourage;
-
-That, if the grantor be a married man, his wife should sign the deed,
-relinquishing her interest in the property, commonly called dower;
-
-That either a warranty or quit-claim deed transfers the owner’s entire
-interest in the real estate; but while by the former the grantor warrants
-the title and engages to defend the same “against the lawful claims
-and demands of all persons,” by the latter he avoids all such personal
-liability. Therefore if property be free from incumbrances a quit-claim
-is as good as a warranty deed; notwithstanding this, a purchaser had
-better insist on having the latter in every case;
-
-That deeds should be recorded in the Registry of the county in which the
-real estate is located.
-
-
-MORTGAGES—Real Estate.
-
-A mortgage is a transfer made with intent of giving mortgagee security
-for money loaned or a debt in some way incurred. The mortgage is a deed
-conveying to the mortgagee the owner’s title to the estate granted
-in just the same way and with same formalities as a regular deed of
-transfer, subject to one condition, which is, that the mortgage deed
-shall be void if the amount therein specified is paid at the stated time.
-
-After the delivery of the mortgage deed the relative standing of the
-parties is this:
-
-The mortgagee:
-
-Unless the right is specially waived in the deed, he may enter and take
-possession. He is therefore the owner subject to a condition, and has in
-him the right of possession;
-
-He may sell and assign to a third party his interest in the mortgaged
-property, investing such person with all his rights therein;
-
-When the stated time for payment, whether of principal or interest, has
-elapsed, and the conditions have not been complied with, foreclosure of
-mortgage may be commenced, and at the expiration of three years from
-such commencement, he may take absolute possession of the estate, unless
-mortgagor redeems it within that time;
-
-He may insure mortgaged premises for his own protection.
-
-The mortgagor:
-
-He is not in possession of mortgaged premises by right, unless by special
-permission;
-
-He must pay all amounts designated in the mortgage deed, at the time
-therein specified;
-
-He may redeem the property at any time within three years after
-commencement of foreclosure, by paying amount due; with interest and
-legal costs.
-
-He may sell his remaining interest (called equity of redemption), after
-mortgage transfer, or procure other mortgages on same property.
-
-
-Personal Property.
-
-Mortgages of personal property are much more informal in their execution
-than similar transfers of real estate. The transfer is a complete change
-of ownership title, with similar conditional clause, relative to payment,
-to that of a mortgage deed.
-
-The several states make provisions for record of these conveyances, which
-are to be observed in order to insure the proper security of mortgagee’s
-title, since record has same significance with personal as with real
-estate mortgage transfers.
-
-A farther analogy may be found in the fact of a right of foreclosure and
-equity of redemption.
-
-
-Wills.
-
-If at any time we were to say that “Every man his own lawyer” would be
-giving to some very poor assistance, we think the suggestion would be
-eminently proper here. This is not the word of discouragement, but of
-caution, else the practicability of these articles, which is the theory
-leading to their publication, might with propriety be questioned. There
-is no department of legal work where more skill and care may be demanded
-than in this. But though care is ever to be exercised, not always is
-superior skill necessary, for one may desire a very simple and direct
-disposition of his property, and this may be done if only the formalities
-are observed, by one not conversant with the niceties of law points, and
-done in such a proper and regular manner that all complications will be
-avoided. But where different interests are to be carved out of an estate,
-then the execution of it requires skill and experience.
-
-Who may make a will? Any person who has attained proper age and is of
-sound mind. By the old common law a married woman was not competent, but
-this restriction has been removed by statutory enactment in most of the
-states, and a married woman in those states is no longer forbidden the
-disposition of her property in accordance with her own wishes.
-
-Quite generally eighteen years for males and sixteen for females
-are designated as proper ages. Children not mentioned in a will,
-unless provided for in testator’s lifetime, are presumed to have been
-accidentally omitted, and take same share of the estate as they would
-if there had been no will. It will therefore be readily seen that if
-omission was intentional, testator’s design would be defeated. Whenever
-such omission of gift to a child is designed it should be particularly
-mentioned in the will.
-
-A codicil is simply an addition to or change in the will, and should be
-attached to the original, and executed with same formalities.
-
-In making a will be careful to observe:
-
-That the person is of proper age and sound mind;
-
-That all statements and declarations be made in clear, unambiguous
-language, so that a misconception of it will be impossible;
-
-That, in propriety, the word “bequeath” should be used as applied to
-personal estate, and “devise” as belonging to real;
-
-That, unless a life estate simply is intended, words of inheritance
-(heirs) should be coupled with devisee’s name;
-
-That, in most of the states, three witnesses are required. They should be
-wholly disinterested, so far as having no personal interest in the will;
-they should see the testator sign, and should each attach his signature
-in testator’s presence, and in presence of the others;
-
-That it is well for the testator to name an executor, although this is
-not required, since in the absence of such directions the Court will
-appoint an administrator.
-
-
-OUTLINE OF FORM.
-
- I ⸺ ⸺ of ⸺ ⸺ being of sound mind, hereby make and declare this
- to be my last will and testament. I give, devise and bequeath my
- estate and property, real and personal as follows:
-
- [Then follow disposition of property and appointment of executor.]
-
- In witness whereof I have signed, sealed, published and declared
- this instrument to be my last will and testament, at ⸺ this ⸺ day
- of ⸺.
-
- ⸺ ⸺ [SEAL]
-
-The witnesses then add:
-
- The said ⸺ ⸺ on said ⸺ day of ⸺ signed, published and declared
- the above as his last will and testament; and we, at his request,
- and in his presence, and in the presence of each other, have
- hereunto subscribed our names as witnesses thereto.
-
- ⸺ ⸺
- ⸺ ⸺
- ⸺ ⸺
-
-The destruction of a will revokes it. The making of a new will revokes
-all former ones.
-
-
-
-
-SUNDAY READINGS.
-
-SELECTED BY THE REV. J. H. VINCENT, D.D.
-
-
-[_May 4._]
-
-Draw yet nearer, O, my soul! with thy _most fervent love_. Here is matter
-for it to work upon, something worth thy loving. O see what beauty
-presents itself! Is not all the beauty in the world united here? Is not
-all other beauty but deformity? Dost thou now need to be persuaded to
-love? Here is a feast for thine eyes and all the powers of thy soul; dost
-thou need entreaties to feed upon it? Canst thou love a little shining
-earth, a walking piece of clay? And canst thou not love that God, that
-Christ, that glory, which are so truly and unmeasurably lovely? Thou
-canst love thy friend because he loves thee; and is the love of a friend
-like the love of Christ? Their weeping or bleeding for thee does not ease
-thee, not stay the course of thy tears or blood; but the tears and blood
-that fell from thy Lord have a sovereign, healing virtue. O my soul! If
-love deserves and should beget love, what incomprehensible love is here
-before thee! Pour out all the store of thy affections here, and all is
-too little—O that it were more! O that it were many thousand times more!
-Let him be first served that served the first. Let him have the first
-born and strength of thy soul, who parted with strength, and life and
-love for thee.
-
-O my soul! dost thou love for _excellency_? Yonder is the region of
-light; this is the land of darkness. Yonder twinkling stars, that shining
-moon and radiant sun, are all but lanterns, hung out of thy Father’s
-house, to light thee while thou walkest in this dark world. But how
-little dost thou know the glory and blessedness that are within.
-
-Dost thou love for _suitableness_? What person more suitable than
-Christ—his god-head and humanity, his fullness and freeness, his
-willingness and constancy, all proclaim him thy most suitable friend.
-What state more suitable to thy misery than mercy, or to thy sin and
-pollution than honor and perfection? What place more suitable to thee
-than heaven? Does this world agree with thy desires? Hast thou not had a
-sufficient trial of it, or dost thou love for interest and near relation?
-Where hast thou better interest than in heaven, or nearer relation than
-there?
-
-Dost thou love for _acquaintance and familiarity_? Though thine eyes
-have never seen thy Lord, yet thou hast heard his voice, received his
-benefits, and lived in his bosom. He taught thee to know thyself and him;
-he opened thee that first window, through which thou sawest into heaven.
-Hast thou forgotten since thy heart was careless and he awakened it;
-hard, and he softened it; stubborn, and he made it yield; at peace, and
-he troubled it; whole, and he broke it; and broken, till he healed it
-again? Hast thou forgotten the times when he found thee in tears; when he
-heard thy secret sighs and groans, and left all to come and comfort thee?…
-
-Methinks I hear him still saying to me, “Poor sinner, though thou hast
-dealt unkindly with me, and cast me off, yet I will not do so by thee;
-though thou hast set light by me and all my mercies, yet they and myself
-are thine. What wouldst thou have that I can give thee? And what dost
-thou want that I can not give thee? If anything I have will give thee
-pleasure, thou shalt have it. Wouldst thou have pardon? I freely forgive
-thee all the debt. Wouldst thou have grace and peace? Thou shalt have
-both. Wouldst thou have myself? Behold I am thine, thy friend, thy Lord,
-thy brother, husband and head. Wouldst thou have the Father? I will bring
-thee to him, and thou shalt have him, in and by me.” These were my Lord’s
-reviving words.
-
- * * * * *
-
-If _bounty and compassion_ be an attractive of love, how immeasurably,
-then, am I bound to love him! All the mercies that have filled up my
-life, all the places that ever I abode in, all the societies and persons
-I have been conversant with, all my employments and relations, every
-condition I have been in, and every change I have passed through, all
-tell me that the fountain is overflowing goodness. Lord, what a sum of
-love am I indebted to thee! And how does my debt continually increase!
-How should I love again for so much love? But shall I dare to think of
-requiting thee, or of recompensing all thy love with mine? Will my mite
-requite thee for thy golden mines, my faint wishes for thy constant
-bounty; mine, which is nothing, or not mine, for thine, which is infinite
-and thine own? Shall I dare to contend in love with thee, or set my
-borrowed languid spark against the sun of love?
-
- * * * * *
-
-No, Lord, I yield; I am overcome. O blessed conquest. Go on victoriously
-and still prevail, and triumph in thy love. The captive of love shall
-proclaim thy victory; when thou leadest me in triumph from earth to
-heaven, from death to life, from the tribunal to the throne! myself, and
-all that see it, shall acknowledge thou hast prevailed, and all shall
-say, “Behold how he loved him.”—_From Baxter’s “Saint’s Rest,” abridged
-by Fawcett._
-
-
-[_May 11._]
-
-For we, being accustomed to a careless and perfunctory performing of
-these duties, can not but find it a hard and difficult matter to keep
-our hearts so close unto them as to perform them as we ought to do, and
-so as that we may be really said to do them. For we must not think that
-sitting in the church while the word of God is preached, is hearing
-the word of God, or being present there while prayers are read is real
-praying; no, no, there is a deal more required than this to our praying
-to the great God aright; insomuch that, for my own part, I really think
-that prayer, as it is the highest, so it is the hardest duty that we can
-be engaged in; all the faculties of our souls as well as members of our
-bodies being obliged to put forth themselves in their several capacities,
-to the due performance of it.
-
-And as for these several graces and virtues with which our souls must be
-adorned withal, before they ever can come to heaven, though it be easy
-to talk of them, it is not so to act them. I shall instance only in some
-few, as to love God above all other things, and other things only for
-God’s sake; to hope on nothing but God’s promises, and to fear nothing
-but his displeasure; to love other men’s persons so as to hate their
-vices, and so to hate their vices as still to love their persons; not
-to covet riches when we have them not, nor trust on them when we have
-them; to deny ourselves that we may please God, and to take up our cross
-that we may follow Christ; to live above the world whilst we are in it,
-and to despise it whilst we use it; to be always upon our watchguard,
-strictly observing not only the outward actions of our life, but the
-inward motions of our hearts; to hate those very things which we used to
-love, and to love those very duties which we used to hate; to choose the
-greatest affliction before the least sin, and to neglect the getting of
-the greatest gains rather than the performing of the smallest duty; to
-believe truths which we can not comprehend, merely upon the testimony of
-one whom we never saw; to submit our own wills to God’s and to delight
-ourselves in obeying him; to be patient under sufferings, and thankful
-for all the troubles we meet with here below; to be ready and willing to
-do and suffer anything we can for him who hath done and suffered so much
-for us; to clothe the naked, feed the hungry, relieve the indigent, and
-rescue the oppressed to the utmost of our power; in a word, to be every
-way as pious toward God, as obedient to Christ, as loyal to our prince,
-as faithful to our friends, as loving to our enemies, as charitable to
-the poor, as just in our dealings, as eminent in all true graces and
-virtues, as if we were to be saved by it; and yet by no confidence in
-it, but still look upon ourselves as unprofitable servants, and depend
-upon Christ, and Christ alone for pardon and salvation.—_From “Private
-Thoughts upon Religion and a Christian Life,” by Bishop Beveridge._
-
-
-[_May 18._]
-
-Now, upon the bank of the river, on the other side, they saw the two
-Shining Men again, who there waited for them. Therefore, being come out
-of the river, they saluted them, saying: “We are ministering spirits,
-sent forth to minister for those who shall be heirs of salvation.” Thus
-they went toward the gate.
-
-Now, you must note that the city stood upon a mighty hill; but the
-pilgrims went up that hill with ease, because they had these two men to
-lead them up by the arms; they had likewise left their mortal garments
-behind them in the river; for though they went in with them, they came
-out without them. They therefore went up here with much agility and
-speed, though the foundation upon which the city was framed was higher
-than the clouds; they therefore went up through the regions of the air,
-sweetly talking as they went, being comforted because they safely got
-over the river, and had such glorious companions to attend them.
-
-The talk that they had with the Shining Ones was about the glory of the
-place; who told them that the beauty and glory of it was inexpressible.
-There, said they, is “the Mount Zion, the heavenly Jerusalem, the
-innumerable company of angels, and the spirits of just men made perfect.”
-You are going now, said they, to the paradise of God, wherein you shall
-see the tree of life, and eat of the never fading fruits thereof; and,
-when you come there, you shall have white robes given you, and your
-walk and talk shall be every day with the King, even all the days of
-eternity. There you shall not see again such things as you saw when you
-were in the lower region, upon the earth, to-wit: sorrow, sickness,
-affliction and death; “for the former things are passed away.” You are
-going now to Abraham, to Isaac, and to the prophets, men that God hath
-taken away from the evil to come, and that are now resting upon their
-beds, each one walking in his righteousness. The men then asked, What
-must we do in the holy place? To whom it was answered: You must there
-receive the comfort of all your toil, and have joy for all your sorrow;
-you must reap what you have sown, even the fruit of all your prayers,
-and tears, and sufferings for the King by the way. In that place you
-must wear crowns of gold, and enjoy the perpetual sight and visions of
-the Holy One; for there you shall see him as he is. There also you shall
-serve him continually with praise, with shouting and thanksgiving, whom
-you desired to serve in the world, though with much difficulty, because
-of the infirmity of your flesh. There you shall enjoy your friends again
-that are gone thither before you, and there you shall with joy receive
-even every one that follows into the holy place after you. There also you
-shall be clothed with glory and majesty, and put into an equipage fit to
-ride out with the King of Glory.… Also when he shall again return to the
-city, you shall go too, with sound of trumpet and be ever with him.—_From
-Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress._
-
-
-[_May 25._]
-
-If we can make this with ourselves: I was in times past dead in
-trespasses and sins, I walked after the prince that ruleth in the air,
-and after the spirit that worketh in the children of disobedience; but
-God, who is rich in mercy, through his great love, wherewith he loved
-me, even when I was dead, hath quickened me in Christ. I was fierce,
-heady, proud, high minded, but God hath made me like a child that is
-newly weaned. I loved pleasures more than God; I followed greedily the
-joys of this present world; I esteemed him that erected a stage or
-theater more than Solomon which built a temple to the Lord; the harp,
-viol, timbrel, and pipe, men singers and women singers were at my feast;
-it was my felicity to see my children dance before me; I said of every
-kind of vanity, O how sweet art thou unto my soul! All which things are
-now crucified to me, and I to them; now I hate the pride of life, and
-the pomp of this world; now I take as great delight in the way of thy
-testimonies, O Lord, as in all riches; now I find more joy of heart in
-my Lord and Savior, than the worldly minded man when “his possessions do
-much abound;” now I taste nothing sweet but the bread which came down
-from heaven, to give life unto the world; now my eyes see nothing but
-Jesus rising from the dead; now my ears refuse all kinds of melody, to
-hear the song of them that have gotten the victory of the beast and of
-his image, and of his mark, and of the number of his name, that stand on
-the sea of glass, “having the harps of God, and singing the song of Moses
-the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvelous
-are thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are thy ways, O King of
-saints.” Surely, if the Spirit have been thus effectual in the sacred
-work of our regeneration with newness of life, if we endeavor thus to
-form ourselves anew, then we may say boldly with the blessed apostle, in
-the tenth to the Hebrews: We are not of them that withdraw ourselves to
-perdition, but which follow faith to the salvation of the soul.…
-
-The Lord of his infinite mercy give us hearts plentifully fraught with
-the treasure of this blessed assurance of faith unto the end.—_From
-Hooker._
-
- * * * * *
-
-All men have a rational soul and moral perfectibility; it is these
-qualities which make the poorest peasant sacred and valued by me. Moral
-perfectibility is our destiny, and here are opened up to the historian a
-boundless field and a rich harvest.—_Forster._
-
-
-
-
-READINGS IN ART.
-
-II.—THE PAINTERS AND PAINTINGS OF NORTHERN EUROPE.
-
- This paper is abridged from “German, Flemish and Dutch
- Paintings,” by H. J. Wilmot Buxton, M.A., and Edward J. Poynter,
- R.A.
-
-
-Art in Germany and the Netherlands may be considered as beginning about
-the middle of the fourteenth century. There is, however, no name of
-importance in the German school of artists until the time of Albrecht
-Dürer. Before him painters had shown little or no originality in their
-work. They had followed the Byzantine models largely, and had been
-influenced by the servile and narrow influences of the middle ages. With
-the new intellectual and spiritual life which sprang up in the fifteenth
-century, artistic life awoke in Germany. Dürer was the first and greatest
-master of the school. He was born in Nuremberg on the 21st of May, 1471.
-
-His father was a Hungarian, who settled in Nuremberg as a goldsmith.
-Albrecht Dürer was taught his father’s trade, but fortunately his talent
-for art was observed, and he was sent, in 1484, a boy of thirteen years,
-to Schongauer. In 1486 he was apprenticed to Michael Wolgemut for three
-years. From the studio of his master, Albrecht Dürer passed, in the year
-1490, to a new world—he traveled; and in those “wander-years,” which
-lasted till 1494, he was doubtless laying in stores of learning for the
-after-time; but unfortunately we know nothing of those years, except
-that he had a glimpse of Venice, the first sight of the Italian paradise
-which, in his case, though seen again, never made him unfaithful to the
-art of his fatherland. In 1494, Albrecht Dürer returned to Nuremberg, and
-married Agnes Frey, the daughter of a singer. He received two hundred
-florins with his wife for her dowry, and it has been said that with
-her he found more than two thousand unhappy days. In 1506, Dürer again
-traveled to Italy, and found a warm welcome from the painters at Venice,
-a city which he now beheld for the second time. Doubtless he learned
-much from the works which he saw, and the criticism which he heard, but,
-fortunately for his country, he could go to Italy without becoming a
-copyist. Giovanni Bellini paid him especial honor, and Dürer tells us
-that he considered Bellini “the best painter of them all.”
-
-Between the years 1507 and 1520, Dürer produced many of his most famous
-works. In 1509, he bought a house for himself in the Zisselgasse, at
-Nuremberg. In 1515 Raphael sent a sketch from his own pencil to his great
-brother, who has been well styled the “Raphael of Germany.” The sketch is
-in red chalk, and is preserved in the collection of the Archduke Charles,
-at Vienna. In 1520 we find Dürer appointed court-painter to the emperor,
-Charles V., a position which he had already held under Maximilian. His
-own countrymen seem to have been niggardly in their reward of genius,
-for the court-painter had only a salary of one hundred florins a year,
-and painted portraits for a florin (about twenty English pence). In the
-same year Dürer, accompanied by his wife, visited the Netherlands, and
-at Antwerp, then the most important town of the Low Countries, both he
-and his wife were entertained at a grand supper; the master has recorded
-in his journal his pleasure at the honor bestowed upon him. At Ghent
-and Bruges all were delighted to show their respect for his genius. At
-Brussels, Dürer was summoned to the court of Margaret of Austria, Regent
-of the Netherlands, to whom he presented several engravings. Either
-through jealous intrigues, or from some other cause, his court favor was
-of short duration. In Brussels he painted several portraits which were
-never paid for, and for a time he was in straitened circumstances. Just
-at this time, however, Christian II., king of Denmark, became acquainted
-with him, and having shown every mark of honor to the painter, sat to him
-for his portrait. Soon afterward he returned to Germany.
-
-Once more at home in his beloved Nuremberg, Dürer wrote to remind the
-Town Council that whilst the people of Venice and Antwerp had offered
-him liberal sums to dwell among them, his own city had not given him
-five hundred florins for thirty years of work. But we must pass to the
-end. Whether the health of Albrecht Dürer had been injured by home cares
-and the tongue of Agnes Frey, we know not, though many passages in his
-letters and journal seem to point to this fact. He died on the 6th of
-April, 1528, and was buried in the cemetery of St. John, at Nuremberg.
-
-Most of Dürer’s works are to be found in Germany. In the Louvre there are
-only three or four drawings. The Museum of Madrid possesses several of
-his paintings—a “Crucifixion” (1513), showing the maturity of his genius,
-two “Allegories” of the same type as the “Dance of Death,” so favorite
-a subject at this period, and a “Portrait of Himself,” bearing the date
-1496. At Munich we may trace, in a series of seventeen pictures, the
-dawn, the noonday, and the evening of Albrecht Dürer’s art. The “Portrait
-of his Father,” 1497, is one of his earliest works. His father was then
-seventy years old. The color is warm and harmonious. The masterpiece of
-Dürer’s art is the painting of the four apostles—“St. John, St. Peter,
-St. Paul and St. Mark.” This wonderful work is clearly the production of
-his later years; it bears no date, but the absence of the hardness, which
-Michael Wolgemut’s workshop had imparted to his early style, is gone, and
-the whole work shows the influence of his travels and unflagging study.
-It is usually assigned to the year 1526. The picture has been supposed
-to represent the “Four Temperaments,” but there is no satisfactory proof
-that Dürer intended this.
-
-Vienna possesses some of the finest specimens of his art. In the legend
-of “The Ten Thousand Martyrs,” who were slain by the Persian king
-Shahpour II., Dürer has described on a panel of about a foot square every
-conceivable kind of torture. These horrors are witnessed by two figures
-which represent the painter himself, and his friend Pirkheimer.
-
-The “Adoration of the Trinity” is one of the most famous of Dürer’s
-works. It is a vast allegorical picture, representing the Christian
-Religion.
-
-Of his wood-cuts the best known are the “Apocalypse,” 1498; the “Life
-of the Virgin,” 1511; and the “History of Christ’s Passion.” Of his
-copper-plate engravings, “St. Hubert,” “St. Jerome,” and “The Knight,
-Death, and the Devil,” bearing the date 1513, in which we see what Kugler
-calls “the most important work which the fantastic spirit of German art
-has ever produced.” The weird, the terrible, and the grotesque look forth
-from this picture like the forms of some horrible nightmare. Another
-famous engraving, called “Melancholy,” is full of mystic poetry; it bears
-the date 1514. To these may be added a series of sixteen drawings in pen
-and ink on gray paper, heightened with white, representing “Christ’s
-Passion,” which he never engraved. They are in his best style, and among
-the finest of his works.
-
-
-HANS HOLBEIN.
-
-Contemporary with Dürer lived another great artist, Hans Holbein. He was
-born at Augsburg, in 1497. Comparing him with Albrecht Dürer, Kugler
-says that “as respects grandeur and depth of feeling, and richness of
-his invention and conception in the field of ecclesiastical art, he
-stands below the great Nuremberg painter. Though not unaffected by the
-fantastic element which prevailed in the Middle Ages, Holbein shows it
-in his own way.” What we know of Holbein’s life must be told briefly. He
-was painting independently, and for profit, when only fifteen. He was
-only twenty when he left Augsburg and went to Bâle. There he painted his
-earliest known works, which still remain there. In 1519, after a visit to
-Lucerne, we find him a member of the Guild of Painters at Bâle, and years
-later he was painting frescoes for the walls of the Rathaus—frescoes
-which have yielded to damp and decay, and of which fragments only remain.
-These are in the Museum of Bâle, as well as eight scenes from “The
-Passion,” which belong to the same date. Doubtless Holbein had gone
-to Bâle poor, and in search of any remunerative work. It is said that
-he and his brother Ambrose visited that city with the hope of finding
-employment in illustrating books, an art for which Bâle was famous. Hans
-Holbein was destined, however, to find a new home and new patrons. In
-1526, Holbein went to England. The house of Sir Thomas More, in Chelsea,
-received him, and there he worked as an honored guest—painting portraits
-of the ill-fated Chancelor and his family. Of other portraits painted at
-this time that of “Sir Bryan Tuke,” treasurer of the king’s chamber, now
-in the collection of the Duke of Westminster, and that of “Archbishop
-Warham,” in the Louvre, are famous specimens. Having returned to Bâle for
-a season, hard times forced Holbein to seek work once more in England.
-This was in 1532, when he was taken into the service of Henry VIII., a
-position not without its dangers. He was appointed court-painter at a
-salary of thirty-four pounds a year, with rooms in the palace. The amount
-of this not very magnificent stipend is proved from an entry in a book at
-the Chamberlain’s office, which, under the date of 1538, contains these
-words: “Payd to Hans Holbein, Paynter, a quarter due at Lady Day last, £8
-10_s._ 9_d._”
-
-Holbein was employed to celebrate the marriage of Anne Boleyn by painting
-two pictures in tempera in the Banqueting Hall of the Easterlings, at the
-Steelyard. He chose the favorite subjects for such works, “The Triumph of
-Riches,” and “The Triumph of Poverty.” The pictures probably perished in
-the Great Fire of London. In 1538, Holbein was engaged on a very delicate
-mission, considering the matrimonial peculiarities of his royal master.
-He was sent to Brussels to paint the “Portrait of Christina,” widow of
-Francesco Sforza, Duke of Milan, whom Henry would have made his queen,
-had she been willing. Soon after, having refused an earnest invitation
-from Bâle to return there, Holbein painted an aspirant to the royal hand,
-Anne of Cleves. Perhaps the painter flattered the lady; at all events
-the original was so distasteful to the king that he burst into a fit of
-rage which cost Thomas Cromwell his head. Holbein continued his work as a
-portrait painter, and has left us many memorials of the Tudor Court. He
-died in 1543, of the plague, but nothing is known of his burial place.
-Some time before his death we hear of him as a resident in the parish of
-St. Andrew Undershaft, in the city.
-
-The fame of this great master rests almost entirely upon his power as
-a portrait painter. In the collection of drawings at Windsor, mostly
-executed in red chalk and Indian ink, we are introduced to the chief
-personages who lived in and around the splendid court in the troublous
-times of the second Tudor.
-
-
-JOHANN FRIEDRICH OVERBECK.
-
-After the death of Dürer and Holbein the German school did not long
-hold its supremacy. Its decline was rapid, and not until the present
-century was there a re-awakening. Johann Friedrich Overbeck, the chief
-of the revivalists of German art, was born at Lübeck, in 1789. When
-about eighteen years of age he went to Vienna, to study painting in the
-academy of that city. The ideas on art which he had carried with him
-were so entirely new and so little agreeable to the professors of the
-academy, that they met with but small approval. On the other hand, there
-were several among his fellow-pupils who gladly followed his lead; and in
-1810, Overbeck, accompanied by a small band of youthful artists, went to
-Rome, where he established the school which was afterward to become so
-famous.
-
-Overbeck, who was professor of painting in the Academy of St. Luke, a
-foreign member of the French Institute, and a member of all the German
-academies, died at Rome in 1869, at the advanced age of eighty years. He
-painted both in fresco and in oil. Of his productions in fresco, the most
-noteworthy are a “Vision of St. Francis” in Santa Maria degli Angeli, at
-Assisi, and five scenes from Tasso’s “Jerusalem Delivered,” in the villa
-of the Marchese Massimo, in Rome. Of his oil paintings, the best are the
-“Triumph of Religion in the Arts,” in the Städel Institute at Frankfort;
-“Christ on the Mount of Olives,” at Hamburg; the “Entrance of Christ
-into Jerusalem,” painted in 1816 for the Marien Kirche, at Lübeck; and
-a “Descent from the Cross,” at Lübeck. Overbeck also executed a number
-of small drawings. Of these we may mention forty designs of the “Life of
-Christ,” and many other Biblical subjects.
-
-
-THE SCHOOL OF THE NETHERLANDS.
-
-In the Netherlands, we find before the seventeenth century, two schools
-of art; that of Bruges, whose most famous painters were the brothers Van
-Eyck, and that of Antwerp, whose founder, Matsys, did some fine work. It
-was not until the beginning of the seventeenth century, however, that
-art in the Netherlands attained its full strength and life. The artist
-to whom the revival was due was Peter Paul Rubens. He was born on the
-day of the festival of St. Peter and St. Paul—the 29th of June, 1577, at
-Siegen, in Westphalia. His father was a physician, who being suspected of
-Protestant proclivities, had been forced to flee from his native town of
-Antwerp, and was subsequently imprisoned, not without cause, by William
-of Orange, whose side he had joined. When Peter Paul was a year old,
-his parents removed to Cologne, where they remained for nine years, and
-then on the death of her husband, the mother of Rubens returned with her
-child to Antwerp. Young Rubens was sent to a Jesuit school, doubtless
-in proof of his mother’s soundness in the faith of Rome, and studied
-art. Fortunately for the world, Rubens possessed too original a genius
-to be much influenced by his masters. He visited Italy in 1600, where
-the coloring of the Venetians exercised a great influence upon the young
-painter, and we may consider Paolo Veronese as the source of inspiration
-from which Rubens derived the richness of his tints. In 1601 we find
-Rubens in the service of Duke Vincenzo Gonzaga of Mantua, an enthusiastic
-patron of art, and two years later he was sent to Philip III. of Spain,
-on an “artistic commission,” some secret mission, perhaps, but certainly
-as the bearer of costly presents. On his return from Spain he passed some
-time in Mantua, Rome, and Genoa; the _dramatic power_ of his pictures
-he derived probably from Michelangelo, as he had learned richness of
-coloring from Veronese, and we can trace the influence of Giulio Romano,
-whose works he must have studied at Mantua.
-
-Rubens settled in Antwerp, and married in 1609 his first wife, Isabella
-Brandt. Always popular, and always successful, Rubens founded a school
-of painting in Antwerp, which was soon crowded with pupils. His life,
-however, was destined to be full of action and movement. In 1620 he
-went to Paris at the invitation of Marie de Medicis, then living in the
-Luxembourg Palace. The work which the widowed queen proposed to Rubens
-was to decorate two galleries, the one with scenes from her own history,
-the other with pictures from the life of Henri IV.
-
-In 1626 Rubens visited Holland, saw the principal painters of that
-country, and lost his wife in the same year. The picture of the two sons
-of this marriage is in the Lichtenstein Gallery, in Vienna. In 1627
-Rubens was employed in diplomatic service at the Hague, and in the next
-year he was ambassador to Philip IV. of Spain, from the Infanta Isabella,
-widow of the archduke Albert. In 1629 we find the painter still acting as
-a diplomatist, and this time to the Court of England. The courtly manner,
-handsome person, and versatile genius of Rubens made him a favorite at
-Whitehall.
-
-On his return to Antwerp in 1630, he married his second wife, Helena
-Fourment, a girl of sixteen, belonging to one of the richest families
-in the city. She served him many times as a model for his pictures. The
-great master died in 1640, wealthy, honored, and famous, not only in his
-own city, but in many another. He was buried in the Church of St. Jacques
-at Antwerp.
-
-In speaking briefly of the chief works of Rubens, we come first to the
-“Descent from the Cross,” in Antwerp Cathedral. We find in this wonderful
-work perfect unity, and a nobler conception and more finished execution
-than usual. Of the coloring it is needless to speak. But even here in
-this masterpiece we notice the absence of spirituality. The dead Christ
-is an unidealized study, magnificently painted and drawn, but unredeemed
-by any divinity of form, or pathos of expression in the head, so that we
-discover no foregleam of the Resurrection; it is a dead body, no more.
-Among the eighteen pictures by Rubens in the Antwerp Museum, is a “Last
-Communion of St. Francis,” which has a great reputation, but suffers from
-the ignoble type of St. Francis’s head. It was painted in 1619.
-
-In the Gallery at Munich we find ninety-five paintings by this master,
-illustrating all his styles. The masterpiece is the “Last Judgment.”
-Passing to Vienna, we find in the Lichtenstein Gallery the portraits
-of Rubens’s “Two Sons,” and a long series of pictures illustrating the
-“History of Decius.” In the Belvedere is a magnificent portrait of
-his second wife, “Helena Fourment.” In the Louvre we find forty-two
-paintings by Rubens. The greater number of these belong to the series
-illustrating “The Life of Marie de Medicis.” At Madrid in the Museo del
-Rey is a “Glorified Virgin,” a truly wonderful work. Turning to Russia,
-we find in the Hermitage at St. Petersburg some fine works by this
-master; especially deserving of notice is the “Feast in the House of
-Simon.” Coming home to England we find this great master again largely
-represented. The “History of Ixion on the Cloud” is in the gallery of
-the Duke of Westminster; and “Diana and her Nymphs surprised by Satyrs,”
-painted for Charles I. in 1629. Blenheim contains many great works by
-Rubens.
-
-
-ANTOON VAN DYCK,
-
-The greatest of the pupils of Rubens, the son of a merchant of good
-standing, was born at Antwerp, in 1599. At ten years of age he was
-studying art under Van Balen, and was registered in the Guild as his
-pupil; from him he proceeded to the studio of Rubens. His wonderful
-precocity enabled Van Dyck to become a master in the Guild of Antwerp
-painters when only nineteen. In 1620 he was engaged as an assistant by
-Rubens, and in the following year he was in England employed by James I.
-This royal service soon ended, and in 1623 Van Dyck went to Italy; in
-Venice he copied many of Titian’s works, and spent some time in Rome,
-and a much longer time at Genoa. Wherever he went he was busy with brush
-and canvas, and in Genoa he painted many of his best pictures. From
-1626 to 1632 Van Dyck was in Antwerp, diligently working at some of his
-greatest pictures, historical subjects and portraits. In the Cassel
-Gallery there are fourteen of his portraits, among which that of the
-“Syndic Meerstraten” is one of the most characteristic of his art at
-this period. At the close of these six years of Antwerp work a new world
-opened to him. His first visit to England seems to have been unfruitful,
-but in 1632 he became one of the court painters of Charles I. Success
-and honor now crowned the new works of Van Dyck. He received a salary of
-£200 a year as principal painter to the Stuart court, and was knighted
-by the king. Nothing succeeds like success, and we find Van Dyck sought
-after by the nobility and gentry of England, and at once installed as a
-fashionable portrait painter.
-
-Later, after his return to Flanders, in 1640, with his wife, a lady of
-the Scottish house of Ruthven, he went to Paris, hoping to obtain from
-Louis XIII. the commission to adorn with paintings the largest saloon in
-the Louvre, but here he was doomed to disappointment, as the work had
-been given to Poussin. Van Dyck returned to England, and found that he
-had fallen, like his patron, Charles I., “on evil tongues and evil days.”
-The Civil War had commenced. There was no time now for pipe or tabor,
-for painting of pictures or curling of lovelocks, and whilst trumpets
-were sounding to boot and saddle, and dark days were coming for England,
-Van Dyck died in Blackfriars, on the 9th of December, in 1641, and was
-buried hard by the tomb of John of Gaunt, in old St. Paul’s.
-
-Possessed of less power of invention than his great master, Van Dyck
-shows in his pictures that _feeling_ which is wanting in the works of
-Rubens. It is infinitely more pleasant to gaze on a crucifixion, or some
-other sacred subject, from the pencil of Van Dyck, than to examine the
-more brilliant but soulless treatment of similar works by his master. As
-a portrait painter Van Dyck occupies with Titian and Velasquez the first
-place. In fertility and production he was equal to Rubens, if we remember
-that his artistic life was very brief, and that he died at the age of
-forty-two. He lacked the inexhaustible invention which distinguishes
-his teacher, and generally confined himself to painting a “Dead Christ”
-or a “Mater Dolorosa.” Of Van Dyck’s sacred subjects we may mention the
-“Taking of Jesus in Gethsemane” (Museum of Madrid), “Christ on the Cross”
-(Munich Gallery), the “Vision of the Blessed Hermann Joseph” (Vienna),
-the famous “Madonna with the Partridges” (St. Petersburg), and the “Dead
-Christ,” mourned by the Virgin, and adored by angels, in the Louvre.
-
-Portraits by Van Dyck are scattered widely throughout the galleries of
-Europe, and his best are probably in the private galleries of England. In
-all his portraits there is that air of refinement and taste which rightly
-earned for Van Dyck the name which the Italians gave him, _Pittore
-Cavalieresco_.
-
-
-REMBRANDT.
-
-Contemporaneous with the Flemish school of which Rubens and Van Dyck were
-the masters, was the Dutch school, of which the great name was Rembrandt
-Harmensz van Rijn. Few persons have suffered more from their biographers
-than the painters of the Dutch school, and none of them more than
-Rembrandt. The writings of Van Mander, and the too active imagination
-of Houbraken, have misrepresented these artists in every possible way.
-Thus Rembrandt has been described as the son of a miller, one whose first
-ideas of light and shadow were gained among his father’s flour sacks
-in the old mill at the Rhine. He has been described as a spendthrift
-reveler at taverns, and as marrying a peasant girl. All this is fiction.
-The facts are briefly these: Rembrandt was born on July 15, 1607, in the
-house of his father, Hermann Gerritszoon Van Rijn, a substantial burgess,
-the owner of several houses, and possessing a large share in a mill on
-the Weddesteeg at Leyden. Educated at the Latin school at Leyden, and
-intended for the study of the law, Rembrandt’s early skill as an artist
-determined his father to allow him to follow his own taste.
-
-But it was not from these nor from any master that Rembrandt learnt to
-paint. Nature was his model, and he was his own teacher. In 1630 he
-produced one of his earliest oil paintings, the “Portrait of an Old
-Man,” and at this time he settled as a painter in Amsterdam. He devoted
-himself to the teaching of his pupils more than to the cultivation of the
-wealthy, but instead of being the associate of drunken boors, as some
-have described him, he was the friend of the Burgomaster Six, of Jeremias
-de Decker the poet, and many other persons of good position. In 1632
-Rembrandt produced his famous picture, “The Lesson in Anatomy;” about
-that time he was established in Sint Antonie Breedstraat; in the next
-year he married Saskia van Ulenburch, the daughter of the Burgomaster
-of Leeuwarden, whose face he loved to paint best after that of his old
-mother. We may see Saskia’s portrait in the famous picture, “Rembrandt
-with his wife on his knee,” in the Dresden Gallery; and a “Portrait of
-Saskia” alone is in the Cassel Gallery.
-
-In the year 1640 Rembrandt painted a portrait, long known under the
-misnomer of “The Frame-maker.” It is usually called “Le Doreur,” and it
-is said that the artist painted the portrait in payment for some picture
-frames; but is in reality a portrait of Dorer, a friend of Rembrandt.
-The year 1642 saw Rembrandt’s masterpiece, the so-called “Night-watch.”
-Saskia died in the same year, and the four children of the marriage
-all died early, Titus, the younger son, who promised to follow in his
-father’s steps, not surviving him. Rembrandt was twice married after
-Saskia’s death. The latter years of the great master’s life were clouded
-by misfortune. Probably owing to the stagnation of trade in Amsterdam,
-Rembrandt grew poorer and poorer, and in 1656 was insolvent. His goods
-and many pictures were sold by auction in 1658, and realized less than
-5,000 guilders. Still he worked bravely on. His last known pictures are
-dated 1668. On the 8th of October, 1669, Rembrandt died, and was buried
-in the Wester Kerk.
-
-Rembrandt was the typical painter of the Dutch School; his treatment is
-distinctly Protestant and naturalistic. Yet he was an idealist in his
-way, and as “The King of Shadows,” as he has been called, he brought
-forth from the dark recesses of nature, effects which become, under his
-pencil, poems upon canvas. Rembrandt loved to paint pictures warmed by a
-clear, though limited light, which dawns through masses of shadow, and
-this gives much of that air of mystery so noticeable in his works. In
-most of his pictures painted before 1633, there is more daylight and less
-shadow, and the work is more studied and delicate.
-
-In the National Gallery we find two portraits of Rembrandt, one
-representing him at the age of thirty-two, another when an old man.
-In the same collection is the “Woman taken in Adultery” (1644), and
-the “Adoration of the Shepherds” (1646), both superb in arrangement
-and execution. Germany and Russia are almost as rich as Holland in the
-number of Rembrandt’s pictures which they possess. The “Descent from the
-Cross,” in the Munich Gallery, is a specimen of the sacred subjects of
-this master. He interprets the Bible from the Protestant and realistic
-standpoint, and though the coloring of the pictures is marvelous, the
-grotesque features and Walloon dress of the personages represented
-make it hard to recognize the actors in the gospel story. Many of his
-Scripture characters were doubtless painted from the models afforded him
-in the Jews’ quarter of Amsterdam, where he resided. The magnificent
-panoramic landscape belonging to Lord Overstone, and the famous picture
-of “The Mill” against a sunset sky, are signal examples of his poetic
-power, and his etchings show us this peculiarity of his genius, even
-more than his oil paintings. Of these etchings, which range over every
-class of subject, religious, historical, landscape and portrait, there
-is a fine collection in the British Museum; and they should be studied
-in order to understand the immense range of his superb genius. The “Ecce
-Homo,” to say nothing of the splendor, the light and shade, and richness
-of execution, has never been surpassed for dramatic expression; and we
-forgive the commonness of form and type in the expression of touching
-pathos in the figure of the Savior; nor would it be possible to express
-with greater intensity the terrible raging of the crowd, the ignobly
-servile and cruel supplications of the priests, or the anxious desire to
-please on the part of Pilate. The celebrated plate “Christ Healing the
-Sick,” exhibits in the highest perfection his mastery of chiaroscuro, and
-the marvelous delicacies of gradation which he introduced into his more
-finished work.
-
-The number of Rembrandt’s pictures in Holland, although it includes
-his three greatest, is remarkably small—indeed, they may be counted on
-the fingers; and lately, by the sale of the Van Loon collection, the
-Dutch have lost two more of his finest works in the portraits of the
-“Burgomaster Six” and “His Wife.” But his works abound in the other great
-galleries of Europe.
-
- * * * * *
-
-There is really in nature such a thing as high life. A life of health, of
-sound morality, of disinterested intellectual activity, of freedom from
-petty cares is higher than a life of disease and vice, and stupidity and
-sordid anxiety. I maintain that it is right and wise in a nation to set
-before itself the highest attainable ideal of human life as the existence
-of a complete gentleman.—_Hamerton._
-
-
-
-
-SELECTIONS FROM AMERICAN LITERATURE.
-
-
-THOMAS BAILEY ALDRICH.
-
- “Among the writers who have done much to refine and elevate
- American literature, Thomas Bailey Aldrich should have the
- brightest place of one who has wrought equally well in prose and
- poetry. Among his early efforts ‘Baby Bell’ will longest hold its
- place in poetry.”—_Henry James, Jr._
-
-It is the vision of a gentle, tender spirit, and many eyes unused to
-tears will grow moist over the delicate lines. We have not room for the
-whole.
-
-
-“Baby Bell.”
-
- Have you not heard the poets tell,
- How came the dainty Baby Bell
- Into this world of ours?
- The gates of heaven were left ajar;
- With folded hands and dreamy eyes,
- Wandering out of Paradise,
- She saw this planet, like a star,
- Hung in the glistening depths of even—
- Its bridges, running to and fro,
- O’er which the white-winged angels go,
- Bearing the holy dead to heaven.
- She touched a bridge of flowers—those feet,
- So light they did not bend the bells
- Of the celestial asphodels.
- They fell like dew upon the flowers;
- Then all the air grew strangely sweet!
- And thus came dainty Baby Bell
- Into this world of ours.
-
- …
-
- O, Baby, dainty Baby Bell,
- How fair she grew from day to day!
- What woman-nature filled her eyes;
- What poetry within them lay!
- Those deep and tender twilight eyes,
- So full of meaning, pure and bright,
- As if she yet stood in the light,
- Of those oped gates of Paradise.
- And so we loved her more and more;
- Ah, never in our hearts before
- Was love so lovely born;
- We felt we had a link between
- This real world and that unseen—
- The land beyond the morn.
- And for the love of those dear eyes,
- For love of her whom God led forth
- (The mother’s being ceased on earth
- When Baby came from Paradise),
- For love of Him who smote our lives,
- And woke the chords of joy and pain,
- We said, Dear Christ! our hearts bent down
- Like violets after rain.
-
- …
-
- It came upon us by degrees,
- We saw its shadow ere it fell—
- The knowledge that our God had sent
- His messenger for Baby Bell.
- We shuddered with unlanguaged pain,
- And all our hopes were changed to fears,
- And all our thoughts ran into tears
- Like sunshine into rain.
- We cried aloud in our belief,
- “O, smite us gently, gently, God!
- Teach us to bend and kiss the rod,
- And perfect grow through grief.”
- Ah, how we loved her, God can tell;
- Her heart was folded deep in ours;
- Our hearts are broken, Baby Bell!
-
- At last he came, the messenger,
- The messenger from unseen lands;
- And what did dainty Baby Bell?
- She only crossed her little hands,
- She only looked more meek and fair;
- We parted back her silken hair,
- We wove the roses round her brow—
- White buds, the summer’s drifted snow—
- Wrapt her from head to foot in flowers
- And thus went dainty Baby Bell
- Out of this world of ours.
-
-Some of Aldrich’s descriptions of oriental scenery are richer in color
-and more luxurious, but he is more at home and more captivating with
-familiar themes drawn from every day life. We are charmed with such
-simple pictures as
-
-
-“Before the Rain.”
-
- We knew it would rain, for all the morn
- A spirit on slender ropes of mist
- Was lowering its golden buckets down
- Into the vapory amethyst
-
- Of marshes and swamps and dismal fens,
- Scooping the dew that lay in the flowers,
- Dipping the jewels out of the sea,
- To sprinkle them over the land in showers.
-
- We knew it would rain, for the poplars showed
- The white of their leaves, the amber grain
- Shrunk in the wind—and the lightning now
- Is tangled in tremulous skeins of rain.
-
-
-BAYARD TAYLOR.
-
-North from Jerusalem.
-
-We left Jerusalem by the Jaffa Gate. Not far from the city wall there
-is a superb terebinth tree, now in the full glory of its shining green
-leaves. It appears to be bathed in a perpetual dew; the rounded masses
-of foliage sparkle and glitter in the light, and the great spreading
-boughs flood the turf below with a deluge of delicious shade. A number
-of persons were reclining on the grass under it, and one of them, a very
-handsome Christian boy, spoke to us in Italian and English. I scarcely
-remember a brighter and purer day than that of our departure. The sky was
-a sheet of spotless blue; every rift and scar of the distant hills was
-retouched with a firmer pencil, and all the outlines, blurred away by the
-haze of the previous few days, were restored with wonderful distinctness.
-The temperature was hot, but not sultry, and the air we breathed was an
-elixir of immortality.
-
-Through a luxuriated olive grove we reached the Tombs of the Kings,
-situated in a small valley to the north of the city. Part of the valley,
-if not the whole of it, has been formed by quarrying away the crags of
-marble and conglomerate limestone for building the city. Near the edge
-of the low cliffs overhanging it, there are some illustrations of the
-ancient mode of cutting stone, which, as well as the custom of excavating
-tombs in the rocks, was evidently borrowed from Egypt. The upper surface
-of the rocks was first made smooth, after which the blocks were mapped
-out and cut apart by grooves chiseled between them. I visited four or
-five tombs, each of which had a sort of vestibule or open portico in
-front. The door was low, and the chambers which I entered, small and
-black, without sculptures of any kind. There were fragments of sarcophagi
-in some of them. On the southern side of the valley is a large quarry,
-evidently worked for marble, as the blocks have been cut out from below,
-leaving a large overhanging mass, part of which has broken off and fallen
-down. The opening of the quarry made a striking picture, the soft pink
-hue of the weather-stained rock contrasting exquisitely with the vivid
-green of the vines festooning the entrance.
-
-From the long hill beyond the tombs, we took our last view of Jerusalem,
-far beyond whose walls I saw the Church of the Nativity, at Bethlehem.
-Notwithstanding its sanctity, I felt little regret at leaving Jerusalem,
-and cheerfully took the rough road northward over the stony hills.
-There were few habitations in sight, yet the hillsides were cultivated,
-wherever it was possible for anything to grow. After four hours’ ride we
-reached El Bireh, a little village on a hill, with the ruins of a convent
-and a large Khan. The place takes its name from a fountain of excellent
-water, beside which we found our tents already pitched. The night was
-calm and cool, and the full moon poured a flood of light over the bare
-and silent hills.
-
-We rose long before sunrise and rode off in the brilliant morning—the
-sky unstained by a speck of vapor. In the valley, beyond El Bireh, the
-husbandmen were already at their plows, and the village boys were on
-their way to the uncultured parts of the hills with their flocks of sheep
-and goats. The valley terminated in a deep gorge, with perpendicular
-walls of rock on either side. Our road mounted the hill on the eastern
-side, and followed the brink of the precipice through the pass, where an
-enchanting landscape opened upon us.
-
-The village of Zebroud crowned a hill which rose opposite, and the
-mountain slopes leaning toward it on all sides were covered with
-orchards of fig trees, and either rustling with wheat or cleanly plowed
-for maize. The soil was a dark brown loam, and very rich. The stones
-have been laboriously built into terraces; and, even where heavy rocky
-boulders almost hid the soil, young fig and olive trees were planted in
-the crevices between them. I have never seen more thorough and patient
-cultivation. In the crystal of the morning air the very hills laughed
-with plenty, and the whole landscape beamed with the signs of gladness on
-its countenance.
-
-The site of ancient Bethel was not far to the right of our road. Over
-hills laden with the olive, fig and vine, we passed to Aian el Haramiyeh,
-or the fountain of the robbers. Here there are tombs cut in the rock on
-both sides of the valley. Over another ridge, we descend to a large,
-bowl-shaped valley, entirely covered with wheat, and opening eastward
-toward the Jordan. Thence to Nablous (the Shechem of the Old and Sychar
-of the New Testament) is four hours through a winding dell of the richest
-harvest land. On the way, we first caught sight of the snowy top of Mount
-Hermon, distant at least eighty miles in a straight line. Before reaching
-Nablous, I stopped to drink at a fountain of clear sweet water, beside
-a square pile of masonry, upon which sat two Moslem dervishes. This, we
-were told, was the tomb of Joseph, whose body, after having accompanied
-the Israelites in all their wanderings, was at last deposited near
-Shechem.
-
-There is less reason to doubt this spot than most of the sacred places of
-Palestine, for the reason that it rests not on Christian, but on Jewish
-tradition. The wonderful tenacity with which the Jews cling to every
-record or memento of their early history, and the fact that from the time
-of Joseph a portion of them have always lingered near the spot, render it
-highly probable that the locality of a spot so sacred should have been
-preserved from generation to generation to the present time.
-
-Leaving the tomb of Joseph, the road turned to the west and entered the
-narrow pass between Mounts Ebal and Gerizim. The former is a steep,
-barren peak, clothed with terraces of cactus, standing on the northern
-side of the pass. Mount Gerizim is cultivated nearly to the top, and is
-truly a mountain of blessing, compared with its neighbors. Through an
-orchard of grand old olive trees, we reached Nablous, which presented a
-charming picture, with its long mass of white, dome-topped stone houses,
-stretching along the foot of Gerizim through a sea of bowery orchards.
-The bottom of the valley resembles some old garden run to waste.
-
-
-CELIA THAXTER.
-
-Her home is by the sea, and she gives us some vivid glimpses of ocean
-scenes. Occasionally a joyous phrase is delicately presented, but the
-prevailing tone of her verse, on whatever subject, is in the minor.
-Perhaps “Beethoven” shows most imagination and insight, as well as
-felicity of expression.
-
-
-Beethoven.
-
- If God speaks anywhere, in any voice,
- To us his creatures, surely here and now
- We hear him, while the great chords seem to bow
- Our heads, and all the symphony’s breathless noise
- Breaks over us, with challenge to our souls!
- Beethoven’s music! From the mountain peaks
- The strong, divine, compelling thunder rolls;
- And “Come up higher, come!” the words it speaks,
- “Out of your darkened valleys of despair;
- Behold, I lift you upon mighty wings
- Into Hope’s living, reconciling air!
- Breathe, and forget your life’s perpetual stings—
- Dream, folded on the breast of Patience sweet,
- Some pulse of pitying love for you may beat!”
-
-
-Faith.
-
- Fain would I hold my lamp of life aloft
- Like yonder tower built high above the reef;
- Steadfast, though tempests rave or winds blow soft,
- Clear, though the sky dissolve in tears of grief.
-
- For darkness passes; storms shall not abide,
- A little patience and the fog is past.
- After the sorrow of the ebbing tide
- The singing flood returns in joy at last.
-
- The night is long and pain weighs heavily;
- But God will hold His world above despair.
- Look to the east, where up the lucid sky
- The morning climbs! The day shall yet be fair!
-
-
-The Sandpiper.
-
- Across the narrow beach we flit,
- One little sandpiper and I;
- And fast I gather, bit by bit,
- The scattered driftwood bleached and dry.
- The wild waves reach their hands for it,
- The wild wind raves, the tide runs high,
- As up and down the beach we flit—
- One little sandpiper and I.
-
- Above our heads the sullen clouds
- Scud black and swift across the sky,
- Like silent ghosts in misty shrouds
- Stand out the white light-houses high.
- Almost as far as eye can reach
- I see the close-reefed vessels fly,
- As fast we flit along the beach—
- One little sandpiper and I.
-
- I watch him as he skims along,
- Uttering his sweet and mournful cry;
- He starts not at my fitful song,
- Or flash of fluttering drapery;
- He has no thought of any wrong,
- He scans me with a fearless eye.
- Stanch friends are we, well tried and strong,
- The little sandpiper and I.
-
- Comrade, where wilt thou be to-night
- When the loosed storm breaks furiously?
- My driftwood fire will burn so bright!
- To what warm shelter canst thou fly?
- I do not fear for thee, though wroth
- The tempest rushes through the sky;
- For are we not God’s children both,
- Thou, little sandpiper and I?
-
-
-
-
-UNITED STATES HISTORY.
-
-THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR.
-
-
-Before the middle of the eighteenth century the current of events in the
-American colonies became rapid and impetuous. Many obstacles were met,
-but the swollen stream rushed on, leaping over, or dashing aside the
-barriers that seemed to accelerate, rather than hinder the progress.
-
-But a crisis was at hand, and the danger grew apparent.
-
-England and France, rival nations, and often in conflict, both had
-extensive possessions in this country, and their rights were in dispute.
-The English occupied the Atlantic coast from Maine to Florida, and their
-colonies were well established. As yet all their important settlements
-were east of the Allegheny Mountains, though they claimed, as their right
-by discovery, all the land westward to the Pacific.
-
-Meanwhile, the French had made important inland settlements, occupying
-principally the valley of the St. Lawrence and some of its tributaries.
-They had built Quebec and Montreal, more than 500 miles from the gulf,
-with other towns of importance; had fortified themselves at different
-points along the great chain of lakes, from Ontario to Superior; had
-penetrated the wilderness of western New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio,
-Michigan and Illinois, fixing their stations and building forts on all
-the more important tributaries of the Mississippi, with the evident
-and avowed intention of connecting their St. Lawrence and Canadian
-possessions with the great western valley; and, through the large rivers
-that drain it, find their way to the sea. They would thus confine the
-English to the Atlantic States, and found their empire in the West.
-Comparatively little intercourse as there was between the East and West,
-these designs were well understood, and the resolute purpose to thwart
-them was at once avowed. The nations beyond the Atlantic were nominally
-at peace, but not friendly, and neither disposed to yield to the claims
-of the other. France, dominated by Roman Catholics, and England, the
-leading Protestant nation of Europe, had nurtured hatred and jealousies
-that might any day precipitate a conflict of arms, and the theater of the
-strife would be in their colonial possessions.
-
-But before war was declared the colonists themselves became involved in
-actual hostilities. The English had adjusted their difficulties, and,
-confederate by articles of agreement and a strong national feeling,
-refused to be restrained by the mountain barriers. Two settlements were
-begun west of the Alleghenies, one on the Youghiogheny, and one in some
-part of western Virginia. Their relations with the Indians were friendly,
-and trade with them was profitable. The French, who had taken possession
-of the valley of the Ohio, and were doing their utmost to secure the
-influence of the Indians in all the region between the river and the
-lakes, protested against the encroachment of the English, and warned the
-Governor of Pennsylvania to restrain his subjects from entering territory
-claimed by the King of France. Of course no attention was paid to the
-warning other than appeared in preparations for the conflict that now
-seemed inevitable. The “Ohio Company,” composed of Virginians, continued
-to explore and survey the country. The natives protested against the
-French occupying their country, and the tribes prepared for an armed
-resistance. The Virginia charter included the whole country north to Lake
-Erie, and Governor Dinwiddy thought best, before hostilities were begun,
-to draw up a remonstrance, setting forth in order, the nature and extent
-of the English claim to the valley of the Ohio, and warning the French
-against any further attempt to occupy it. It was necessary that this
-paper, whatever danger and hardship it might require, should be carried
-to the French General St. Pierre, who was stationed at Erie, as commander
-of their forces in the West. The journey, that could be performed only
-on foot, would be through a vast, unbroken wilderness, and would require
-more than ordinary endurance, as well as undaunted courage. George
-Washington, then a young surveyor, was sent for from his home on the
-Potomac, and duly commissioned to carry the document. He set out on
-the last day of October, with four attendants and an interpreter. The
-route was through the mountains to the head waters of the Youghiogheny,
-thence down the stream to the site of Pittsburgh, which was noted as an
-important point, and the key to the situation in the valley of the Ohio.
-Thence the course was twenty miles down the river, and across to Venango
-(Franklin), and thence, by way of Meadville, to Fort Le Bœuf, on the
-head waters of French Creek, fourteen miles from Erie, where he met the
-General, who had come over in person to superintend the fortifications.
-
-The officer received him with courtesy, but declined to discuss any
-questions of national rights. “His superior, the Governor of Canada,
-owned the country from the lakes to the Ohio; and being instructed to
-drive every Englishman from the territory, he would do it.” A respectful
-but decided reply was sent to Dinwiddy, and Washington was dismissed, to
-find his way back to Virginia.
-
-It was by this time midwinter, and the perils of the long journey were
-increased by swollen rivers that had to be crossed on the treacherous
-ice, or on rafts constructed of logs and poles cut for the purpose. Of
-the incidents of that first great public service by the “Father of his
-Country,” but few authentic records are found, and we only know that it
-was performed with fidelity, and that the fuller information gathered
-respecting the strength of the French forces, and their preparations for
-descending the Allegheny with their large fleet of boats and canoes,
-in the spring, thoroughly aroused the Virginians to the importance
-of holding the point at the confluence of the great rivers forming
-the Ohio. In March, and before it was possible for the French to come
-down the Allegheny, a rude stockade was built; but there was not force
-enough to hold it. As the fleet came sweeping down the river, and
-resistance was found impossible, the little band at the head of the Ohio
-surrendered, and was allowed to withdraw from the stockade, which the
-enemy at once entered, and where they laid the foundations of Fort Du
-Quesne. Remonstrance and negotiations having failed, the alternative
-of war was promptly accepted, and Washington having been made Colonel,
-was commissioned to take the fort, “to kill or repel all who interfered
-with the English settlements in the disputed territory.” His regiment of
-Virginia soldiers, in the month of April, encountered difficulties and
-hardships in their westward march that made progress slow.
-
-The roads were well nigh impassable, the streams were bridgeless, and
-drenching rains fell on the tentless soldiers. Before reaching the
-Ohio, Washington learned that the enemy were on the march to attack
-him, and immediately built a stockade that he called Fort Necessity. He
-advanced cautiously, with some heavy skirmishing, in which a number of
-the enemy were killed, and some prisoners were taken. But the promised
-reinforcements not arriving, he fell back to his little fort, and was
-scarcely within the rude enclosure when he was surrounded. The enemy
-in force gained an eminence, from which they could fire into the fort,
-while they were partly concealed. For hours, the gallant little band,
-encouraged by the calm, resolute bearing of their colonel, vigorously
-returned the fire. Thirty of the company were killed, and others wounded,
-when they were allowed to withdraw, taking all their stores and equipage.
-The retreat was orderly, but the enterprise was abandoned.
-
-The valley of the Ohio and the whole country to the lakes was left in the
-power of the French, who were also strengthening their works at Crown
-Point and Fort Niagara.
-
-As yet there had been no declaration of war by England or France, and
-the ministers of the two countries kept assuring each other of peaceful
-intentions, though the hostility of their dependencies in America could
-not be ignored. Louis XV., to help keep the peace, sent an army of
-three thousand soldiers to Canada, and the British government ordered
-General Braddock, with two regiments, to America, to protect their
-frontier settlements. Early in the spring of 1755 this force reached the
-Chesapeake, and in April Braddock held a council with all the Governors,
-at Alexandria. As there had been no formal declaration of war they would
-not invade Canada, but repel the French from the northern and western
-frontier. Vigorous and concerted measures, however, were to be employed.
-Governor Lawrence was to settle and guard the boundaries of Nova Scotia.
-Johnson, of New York, with his militia and a force of Mohawks, hired
-for the purpose, was to capture the French post at Crown Point, while
-Shirley, of Massachusetts, was to drive the enemy from their fortress
-at Niagara; and Braddock himself as commander-in-chief, with the main
-body of the regulars, was to subdue Fort Du Quesne. It was a magnificent
-program, but easier to plan than to execute; and those so full of
-confidence were to encounter some sad reverses.
-
-Braddock’s army numbered about 2,000, nearly all veterans who had served
-in the wars of Europe. There were few provincial troops; two companies
-led by Gates, of New York, and Washington, joining the army at Fort
-Cumberland, was placed on Braddock’s staff as aid-de-camp. The movement
-was necessarily slow. Over a narrow and exceedingly rough road the
-slender column stretched out for some four miles. Braddock was a brave,
-resolute general, acquainted with his army, but ignorant of the country
-and the forces he would have to meet.
-
-Franklin and others had suggested that it would be wise to move
-cautiously. But he scouted the idea that the assault of untutored
-savages that might be encountered before reaching the fort he proposed
-to capture, could make any impression on his regulars. When Washington,
-understanding the modes of Indian warfare, suggested the possibility
-of an ambuscade, the General was furious, and indignantly refused to
-be advised by an inferior. They had advanced without any noteworthy
-casualty till within about seven miles of the fort, and no enemy yet
-appeared. Confident of speedy success, Braddock, at the head of twelve
-hundred chosen troops, pressed on more rapidly, Colonel Gage, leading a
-detachment of three hundred men, in the advance. The road was but twelve
-feet wide, the country uneven and thickly wooded; a hill on the one hand
-and a dry ravine on the other, the whole region covered with a thick
-undergrowth. A few scouts were thrown forward, but the situation gave
-no opportunity for the feeble flanking parties to act. Suddenly there
-was a sharp, rapid fire of musketry heard in the front. The scouts were
-killed or driven in. The advance forces were thrown back in confusion,
-leaving their cannon in the hands of the enemy, who were found to be
-an unexpectedly strong force of both French and Indians. The peril of
-the situation was at once apparent, and, suffering much from their
-concealed foe, Gage’s men wavered and became confusedly mixed in thickest
-underbrush with a regiment that Braddock pushed forward to support them.
-The confusion grew almost to a panic, the men firing constantly, with
-but little effect, in the direction of the concealed enemy, while their
-well directed volleys, from under the cover of rocks and trees, told with
-terrible effect on the English crowded together in the narrow roadway.
-The rash, but brave General rushed to the front, and with impetuous
-courage rallied his men to charge on the foe. But it was impossible.
-They, panic-stricken, were huddled together like sheep, or fled in
-disorder to the rear. The army routed, his aids and officers mostly
-killed or wounded, and the forest strewn with dead or disabled soldiers,
-the General, after having five horses shot under him, fell mortally
-wounded. To Washington, who came to his aid, the fallen hero said: “What
-shall we do now, Colonel?” “Retreat, sir, retreat!” This was ordered,
-and the dying General carried from the scene of carnage. Washington,
-with the Virginians that remained alive, covered the hasty retreat of
-the ruined army. Nearly everything was lost. The artillery, baggage,
-provisions and private papers of the officers were left on the field.
-Braddock died the fourth day, and was buried by the roadside, a mile west
-of Fort Necessity, where Dunbar had been left, an officer with neither
-capacity nor courage. When the fugitives, who had not been pursued far
-from the battleground, reached, his camp, the panic was communicated; he
-destroyed the remaining artillery, baggage and army stores, to the value
-of a hundred thousand pounds sterling, and joined in a most precipitate
-retreat to Fort Cumberland, and thence, in a thoroughly demoralized
-condition, to Philadelphia. Thus, the main army, of which much was
-expected, was in a few days practically destroyed, and nothing more was
-attempted that year.
-
-The work of subduing the French in Nova Scotia, assigned by Braddock and
-the Governors to Lawrence, assisted by the English fleet under Colonel
-Monckton, was done with dispatch and unparalleled cruelty.
-
-The province had been ceded to the English in the treaty of 1713, and,
-remaining under the dominion of Great Britain, was ruled by English
-officers, though the inhabitants were largely French.
-
-The French forts near the New Brunswick line being taken after but feeble
-resistance, the English were masters of the whole country east of the St.
-Croix; and, pretending to fear an insurrection on the part of the Nova
-Scotians, or Acadians, adopted measures with them that have always and
-everywhere met with the most unqualified condemnation. The French in the
-province outnumbered the English three to one, and had their pleasant
-homes in that oldest settlement of their people on the continent. They
-were ruthlessly torn from their homes and the graves of their kindred,
-driven at the point of the bayonet, forced on ship-board, and more than
-three thousand of them, half-starved and destitute, were scattered here
-and there among English colonists, from whom but little kindness and
-less of fellowship could be expected. The guilty agents in the infamous
-transaction, as cowardly as it was inhuman, made themselves the scorn of
-mankind.
-
-In about the only quarter where the British army had that year any
-success, what followed the victory was so shocking to the feelings of
-humanity, and met with such universal condemnation, that even the guilty
-perpetrators of the deed would have blotted the record if they could.
-
-The campaign planned for Shirley, who with his Indian allies was to take
-Fort Niagara, was about as utter a failure as that of Braddock. The fort
-had no great strength, and was not well garrisoned; but it was a month
-before he reached Oswego, where his provincials were to assemble. Four
-weeks were spent in getting his boats ready. A storm caused farther
-delay, and after the storm the wind was in the contrary direction. Then
-another storm caused delay. Sickness prevailed in camp, and by the first
-of October Shirley declared the lake too dangerous for navigation. The
-Indians deserted his standard. The fact was that while on the march, news
-of Braddock’s defeat reached him, and, as they had expected to meet at
-Niagara, he feared to go there, thinking the same fate might await him.
-So he marched homeward, without striking a blow.
-
-Johnson, who was to attack the enemy at Crown Point, had better success,
-though the objective point was not reached, and his was a dear-bought
-victory. His movements were all anticipated, and the portion of his army
-led by Williams, ambushed and cut to pieces. Several hundred Englishmen
-fell. The French still held Crown Point, and had seized and fortified
-Ticonderoga.
-
-That was a year of disasters to the English, and so was the next. The
-Indians, doubtless influenced by the unsuccessful campaign of the
-English, and perhaps instigated by French emissaries, had killed more
-than 1,000 people.
-
-In May, 1756, after two years of actual hostilities, war was declared.
-The English, chagrined with the reverses of the past year, and in danger
-of losing all the territory west of the Alleghenies, after much debate
-in Parliament, decided to place all the military forces sent to America
-under one command. A large army was equipped, and Lord Loudon placed in
-command. He proved unfit for the position, and another year passed with
-great losses and little or nothing gained. The French, led by competent,
-determined men, were everywhere successful, and wasted the British forces
-with repeated assaults, capturing or destroying a large part of the
-armament, till the English had not a single fort or hamlet remaining in
-the valley of the St. Lawrence. And every cabin where English was spoken
-was swept out of the valley of the Ohio. At the end of the year France
-seemed to be in secure possession of twenty times as much territory in
-America as her British rival.
-
-Her colonial possessions endangered, and the flag of the country in
-disgrace, the ministers were forced to resign, and the great commoner,
-William Pitt, became Prime Minister. The dilatory, imbecile Loudon, was
-deposed, and Abercrombie put in his place, with Lord Howe next in rank.
-The gallant Wolfe led a brigade. The campaign for the summer was well
-arranged and prosecuted with energy. In May Amhurst, at the head of ten
-thousand men, reached Halifax. A few days after the fleet was in Gabarus
-Bay, and Wolfe landed his division without serious loss, though under
-fire from the enemy’s batteries. The French dismantled their guns and
-retreated. The siege of Louisburg was pressed with great vigor. Four
-French vessels, one a seventy-four-gun ship, were fired by the English
-boats, and burned in the harbor. The town and fortress became a ruin.
-Resistance was hopeless, and Louisburg capitulated. The garrison, with
-the marines, in all six thousand men, became prisoners of war, and were
-sent to England. Cape Breton and Prince Edward’s Island were surrendered
-to Great Britain.
-
-In another quarter, however, there was not long after only partial
-success, followed by severe disaster. General Abercrombie, with 15,000
-men, reached Lake George, and embarked for Ticonderoga. His equipment
-was in all respects thorough. Proceeding to the northern extremity of
-the lake, they landed safely on the western shore. But the difficulty of
-going farther compelled them to leave the heavy artillery behind, Lord
-Howe leading the advance in person. Before reaching the fort, in a sharp
-skirmish with the pickets, that brave officer was killed. The French
-were overwhelmed, but the soldiers of Howe, smitten with grief, began to
-retreat. Abercrombie was in the rear with the main army, but the soul
-of the expedition was gone. Two days after a determined effort was made
-to take the fort by assault. The defences proved much stronger than was
-expected, and the assailing parties were again and again repulsed with
-great loss. The unavailing efforts were continued for four hours, and
-then they withdrew, having lost in killed and wounded nearly two thousand
-men. Probably in no other battle on the continent did the English have
-so many men engaged, or suffer such terrible loss. Abandoning this
-enterprise as hopeless, the army was withdrawn to Fort George, at the
-other extremity of the lake. Thence Colonel Bradstreet was sent with
-three thousand men, mostly provincials, against Fort Frontenac, at the
-present site of Kingston, at the outlet of Ontario. He embarked his
-command at Oswego, and landed within a mile of the fort. This fortress,
-of great importance, was at the time but feebly garrisoned, and after
-two days’ siege capitulated. Forty-six cannon, nine vessels of war,
-and a vast quantity of military stores were the fruit of this victory.
-It compensated the English for all their losses at Ticonderoga, except
-for the men who were there sacrificed. It was a crushing defeat for
-the French, who became disheartened. Their crops had failed, and with
-almost a famine in the land, it became so difficult to subsist the army
-that the people clamored for peace. “Peace, peace; no matter with what
-boundaries,” was the message sent by the brave Montcalm to the French
-ministry.
-
-The outlook in Canada and along the lakes was not encouraging, and
-Forbes, with nine thousand men from Philadelphia, undertook the
-reduction of Fort Du Quesne, and the expulsion of the French from the
-valley of the Ohio.
-
-Washington was again in command of the Virginians, Armstrong led the
-Pennsylvanians. An advance section, under Major Grant, more eager than
-wise, was attacked by the enemy in ambush, and lost heavily. The main
-column came on slowly, cutting roads and bridging streams, but in such
-force that, as they drew near, those in the fort became alarmed, burned
-their works, and with what they could carry, floated down the river.
-Those eager for the assault, and to avenge injuries received in former
-attempts, marched, unopposed, over the ruins, and unfurled their flag
-over that gateway of the West, calling it, in honor of the great British
-minister, whose energetic measures gave confidence to the army and hope
-to the colonists—Pittsburgh.
-
-Marked progress was made during the summer and fall campaign, and
-Parliament voted twelve million pounds sterling for carrying on the war.
-The colonial magistrates exerted themselves to the utmost, and by the
-spring of 1759 the whole effective force of the English was near fifty
-thousand, while the entire French army was less than eight thousand.
-
-The conquest of Canada was not at first contemplated, but it had become
-evident that the rival nations could not live in peace, with such slight
-natural barriers between them, and so Canada must be conquered and made
-a British province. With that object in view, the campaigns for the year
-were planned.
-
-Prideaux proceeded against Niagara, for the relief of which the French
-collected all their available forces from Detroit, Erie, Le Bœuf and
-Venango. Prideaux was accidentally killed on the 15th, and Sir William
-Johnson, on whom the command devolved, so disposed his forces as to
-intercept the approaching French, and a bloody battle was fought in which
-they were completely routed; the fort soon after capitulated.
-
-Amhurst was victorious on Lake Champlain, and proceeded through Lake
-George, to attack and take Ticonderoga, from which, after feeble
-resistance, the enemy withdrew to Crown Point, and the whole region,
-mapped out for his operations, was recovered, with but little loss on his
-part.
-
-The French were now sadly crippled everywhere, except in the valley of
-the St. Lawrence, and it remained for General Wolfe to achieve the final
-victory. As soon as the river was navigable in the spring he proceeded
-with a force of eight thousand men, and a fleet of forty-four vessels.
-He arrived on the 27th of June at the Isle of Orleans, four miles below
-Quebec, and began his operations vigorously. His camp was located on the
-upper end of the island, and the fleet gave him immediate command of the
-river. On the night of the 29th General Monckton was sent to plant a
-battery on Point Levi, opposite the city, and was successful.
-
-The lower town was soon reduced to ruins, and the upper much injured,
-but the fortress seemed unharmed. The French knowing that the city could
-not be stormed from the river side, had constructed three defences,
-reaching five miles from the Montmorenci to the St. Charles, and in these
-entrenchments the brave Montcalm, with ten or twelve thousand soldiers,
-awaited the movement of his assailants. Anxious for battle, though
-there were serious difficulties in the way of approaching the foe, it
-was decided to risk an engagement by fording the Montmorenci when the
-tide ran out. The attempt was made without success, and with the loss
-of nearly five hundred men. Disappointments, fatigue and exposure threw
-the English general into a fever that held him prisoner in the tent for
-some days; and when convalescent he proposed another assault on the
-lines of defence, but was in that overruled, and it was determined, if
-possible, to gain possession of the Plains of Abraham in the rear of the
-city, without passing the fortifications. After thorough examination a
-place, afterward called Wolfe’s Cove, was found, where it was thought
-possible to make the ascent. On the night appointed, everything being in
-readiness, the English entered their transports, quietly dropped down to
-the place, and with almost superhuman exertions ascended to the plain,
-and the morning revealed them to the greatly astonished defenders of the
-city, drawn up in battle array.
-
-When Montcalm learned the fact so unexpected, he said: “They are now on
-the weak side of this unfortunate city, and we must crush them before
-noon.” With great haste he withdrew his army from the trenches and threw
-them between the English and the city. The battle began with an hour’s
-cannonade, and then the attempt to turn the English flank, but he was
-driven back. The weakened ranks of the French wavered. Wolfe led his
-charge in person, and was shot thrice, and survived but a short time.
-Learning from an attendant that the enemy fled, he gave directions for
-securing the fruits of the battle, and declared he was happy thus to die.
-Montcalm also fell early in the battle, mortally wounded, and when told
-by his surgeon that the end was near, said: “It is well—then I shall not
-live to see Quebec surrendered.” The surrender took place a few days
-after, and the last resistance was offered by the French at Montreal, but
-it was hopeless and of short continuance. The remnants of their beaten
-armies collected there, to the number of ten thousand, were surrendered
-to General Amhurst, and all the French possessions in America were ceded
-to the English. Liberal terms were granted, the rights of conscience
-respected, and the ecclesiastical institutions and property of the
-Catholics respected and protected.
-
- [End of Required Reading for May.]
-
-
-
-
-THE DIVINE SCULPTOR.
-
-By MRS. EMILY J. BUGBEE.
-
-
- I feel the chiseling touch,
- And know that I shall stand,
- Finished and shapely as the work,
- Of the designer’s hand.
- Though cruel is the pain
- From His unceasing blows,
- I hold me, trustfully and still,
- What time “the Angel grows.”
-
- Through slowly passing years,
- With an unerring skill,
- His hand, with patient, tireless care,
- Is shaping to His will;
- That when I stand unveiled
- Before His glorious throne,
- No traces in me shall be found
- Of the unsightly stone.
-
- He sees what I _shall be_,
- Through all the rough disguise,
- And knows, at every stroke he gives,
- Some earthward clinging dies.
- Some harsh discordant part,
- Is rounded into grace;
- Some likeness of the pattern true
- Is fashioned in its place.
-
- Work on, oh, Master hand,
- I gladly yield to thee,
- Until within thy loftiest thought
- I stand complete and free;
- Thy glorious design
- I would not mar or break,
- I shall be satisfied I know,
- When perfected I wake.
-
-
-
-
-REMINISCENCES OF WENDELL PHILLIPS.
-
-By EDWARD EVERETT HALE.
-
-
-For many generations the gift of oratory has been in the blood of the
-Phillips family. The founder of the family in America, the Rev. George
-Phillips, first minister of Watertown, Mass., is noted in New England
-annals for his eloquence. “The irrefragable doctor” he was called by his
-hearers, we learn from the pedantic Mather, so able was he in dispute,
-and such readiness had he on all occasions to stand to his guns and to
-maintain any statement he had once made. But there must have been another
-strain of blood in Wendell Phillips, added to that in the veins of his
-ancestor George, for Mather goes on to say that the earlier Puritan
-was “very averse unto disputation until delivered thereto by extreme
-necessity.”
-
-The son of George Phillips, of Watertown, was the Rev. Samuel Phillips,
-first minister of Rowley, so distinguished a preacher that it was said of
-his father: “He would have been beyond compare, if he had not been the
-father of Samuel.” This is Mather’s epitaph on the Rev. George Phillips.
-
-The grandson of the first Phillips was another George, a minister like
-his father and grandfather, who lived at Brookhaven, Long Island. “A good
-man,” was the second Rev. George, but “thought to be too much addicted to
-facetiousness and wit;” more dangerous qualities in those Puritan times
-than nowadays, and suggesting, again, the Phillips of our day.
-
-The great-grandson of the first George Phillips, nephew to the second,
-was Samuel Phillips, for sixty years minister of Andover, and the father
-of John and Samuel Phillips, the founders of the Andover and Exeter
-academies. Strictly orthodox was the Rev. Samuel Phillips, as one may see
-from his sermons; and the religious tone that he gave to the village of
-Andover has lasted to this day. His many printed sermons are proof of the
-popularity of his public speech, and the election sermon, at least, shows
-that he was not afraid to deal with the living problems of the day.
-
-His sons founded the two Phillips academies, John that at Exeter, and
-the two together the academy at Andover. Samuel was as well a liberal
-benefactor to the theological seminary at Andover. It would be fair to
-say, that with one single exception, where there was perhaps insanity,
-the family has been distinguished for public spirit, as well as for
-eloquence. Two of the grandsons of the Rev. Samuel, Samuel and William,
-were chosen lieutenant-governors of the commonwealth of Massachusetts.
-Their second cousin, John Phillips, was the first mayor of Boston. Their
-grandfathers had been brothers, the one Samuel, the Andover minister, and
-the other John, a Boston merchant. The mother of this second John was
-Margaret Wendell. She was Wendell Phillips’s grandmother, and from her
-he had his Christian name. His mother was of another Puritan family. Her
-maiden name was Walley.
-
-John Phillips, father of Wendell, graduated at Harvard College in 1788,
-and became a lawyer. He was afterward one of the trustees of the college,
-and in 1809 was appointed a judge of common pleas. In 1822 Boston was
-made a city, and John Phillips was chosen the first mayor. He died in
-the next year of a trouble of the heart. His sudden death took place
-when Wendell and his brother George were both scholars in the Boston
-Latin School—the oldest school in America. At that time this school had
-recently been revived, and set in new order, with great local reputation,
-under Mr. Benjamin Apthorp Gould. It is said that the mayor, John
-Phillips, once came into the school to examine it, and, almost of course,
-had offered to him the seat of most dignity on the platform. This his
-little boys thought a mistake in etiquette, considering that no one could
-be of rank as high as the master. They did not hesitate then, more than
-in later days, to express their disapprobation, and when their father
-met them at table, told him they had been mortified to see him in that
-chair. “Ah,” he said, “you were not more ashamed of me than I was of you.”
-
-But this anecdote must only be taken to show that Wendell Phillips
-at eleven years was not afraid of his father, and was not averse to
-criticising what he thought mistaken. He took even distinguished rank
-at school, and another school anecdote shows how early boys can judge
-correctly of each other’s ability, for it is remembered that when he
-first spoke before the assembled school, on Saturday, the first class—who
-sat by themselves, and thought well of their own opinion—were not
-displeased. Charles Chauncey Emerson, who was a crack scholar, one of
-the very highest in repute, turned to George Stillman Hillard and said,
-“That boy will make an orator.” The name of Charles Emerson will not be
-familiar to all your readers, for he died young. But here he is still
-remembered by the men of his time as the young man of most promise, who,
-in those days, left Harvard College. They will not admit that his brother
-Waldo Emerson has won any renown in the world, or rendered any service
-which would not have come in the life of Charles, had it been spared to
-this earth.
-
-From this school, with a distinguished reputation among his fellows,
-Wendell Phillips entered Harvard College in 1827. The college was
-not then what it is now. Neither law nor divinity school was large,
-and these were the only graduate schools at Cambridge. The college
-proper, or the “seminary,” as President Quincy used to call it,
-numbered about two hundred students, of whom the greater part were
-from Massachusetts. A few southern lads, from distant plantation life,
-struggled up into what, in those days of no railroads and of no coast
-lines of steamers, was a foreign country. They were generally favorites;
-there was no such discussion of slavery as to make their position in
-the least uncomfortable, and, indeed, the general drift of sentiment
-among the people around them was not in sympathy with Abolitionists
-or abolitionism. Both these words, if spoken at all in those days in
-New England, were generally spoken with scorn. After a genial and
-affectionate administration, Dr. John Thornton Kirkland resigned the
-presidency of the college in the year 1828. Wendell Phillips was then a
-freshman. To succeed Dr. Kirkland, Josiah Quincy was appointed. He had
-won his reputation by steady work in Congress, first as a Federalist, and
-afterward as a watchful maintainer of northern rights. More lately he
-had approved himself an admirable administrative officer as Mayor of the
-city of Boston—the second chosen under its city charter. John Phillips,
-the father of Wendell Phillips, had been his immediate successor in that
-duty. The older Ware was professor of Divinity, Levi Hedge of Logic and
-Metaphysics, Dr. J. S. Popkin of Greek, Dr. Sidney Willard of Hebrew,
-John Farrar of Mathematics, Edward T. Channing of Rhetoric and Oratory,
-and George Ticknor of the Modern Languages. A few of these names will be
-remembered by general readers, though “’tis sixty years since” and more,
-and I record them because I wish all biographers would tell more than
-they are apt to do of the circumstances under which the mental powers of
-their heroes were trained.
-
-Several of Phillips’s classmates survive, and one of them, Mr. Francis
-Gold Appleton, a gentleman whose wide American sympathies and sterling
-public spirit have endeared him to the whole community in which he lives,
-has kindly given to me some personal reminiscences of the young fellow’s
-life there. Thirteen of his school companions entered college with him.
-Other Boston boys came from the Round Hill school, and Exeter, so that
-in a class of sixty there were at least twenty Boston boys. In a sense,
-therefore, Phillips was not lonely there. But his classmates saw, or
-fancied they saw, that at one time he was moody, and suffering from what
-they called religious depression. They knew, even then—for boys know
-almost everything of the abilities of their companions—that Phillips
-had remarkable power in elocution. They chose him into the Porcellian
-Club—which takes its name from the traditional roasting of a little pig
-(Porcellus)—and of this club he became president. In other days the
-Porcellians were thought to be specially Southern in their proclivities,
-and this club used to rally almost all the Southern students. It is
-therefore rather a queer incident in its history that Wendell Phillips
-stands as a popular president. His college reputation was that of an
-amiable and bright young man, with an especial gift for oratory. He took
-his first degree in 1831—studied at the Law School, then under Professor
-Greenleaf, and Judge Story—and took the degree of Bachelor of Laws in
-1833. He then went into a lawyer’s office in Boston and entered at the
-bar in 1834. He opened his modest office and waited for clients. But in
-those days, perhaps in these days, even such a young man waits long. For
-myself I think that the old dons of money or of business would rather
-give such scraps of formal business as they have to some young stranger
-from the country, who has no relatives in Boston, and whom nobody knows
-there, than to confide private affairs to somebody they have known from
-childhood, whose father, or uncle, or brother-in-law they meet at the
-Saturday Club or the Wednesday Club. But Phillips did not flinch from
-doing what anybody wanted him to do. It has been remembered that in the
-illness of his brother he did the almost mechanical work of the clerk
-of the Municipal Court. This means that he was brought into personal
-relation with every criminal who was brought up there for trial and
-sentence.
-
-But the skies were thickening, and there was not any danger that a young
-man of spirit would long lack a chance if he chose to take it. It was
-in October, 1835, that “a mob of gentlemen of property and standing”
-broke up a meeting of the Women’s Anti-Slavery Society of Boston.
-Phillips was an eye witness of the indignities with which Mr. Garrison
-was then treated. He loyally threw in his fortunes with those of the
-Abolitionists; and, as it proved, his chance came at a public meeting
-called at Faneuil Hall.
-
-At this meeting the small and unpopular set of Abolitionists was in a
-measure reinforced by persons who had not been identified with them;
-for it was a meeting in the interests of free speech. Lovejoy had been
-killed by a mob in Illinois, and the people of Boston were called to
-their historic Town Hall to remonstrate. The moderator selected was
-Jonathan Phillips, a relative of Wendell’s, and a man deservedly of
-leading position in Boston. He was rich, enterprising and wise. He was
-a leader in philanthropic organization. He was a great friend of Dr.
-William Ellery Channing, who said of him once, “I have had much more
-from Mr. Phillips than he ever had from me;” this from a friend who
-was saying that Phillips had derived great profit from Dr. Channing’s
-preaching. Benjamin F. Hallett, a distinguished anti-Masonic leader,
-moved the resolutions. Hillard, a young lawyer, sustained them, and the
-event of the day—on the program—was a speech from Dr. Channing, whose
-reputation as a man of letters and a leader in religious opinion was
-at its height, and who was senior pastor of the most fashionable and
-influential church in Boston. But the meeting was held in Faneuil Hall,
-which, by a clause in the city charter, must be given for the use of any
-fifty citizens who asked for it for a public purpose. Of course, at such
-a meeting any citizen might be present. On this occasion the enemies
-of the Abolitionists were on hand in force. When the fit moment came
-for them to reply, James T. Austin, one of the political leaders of the
-State, of Democratic antecedents, but now Attorney General of the State,
-under the rule of the newly named Whig party, took the floor against the
-resolutions proposed. It was clear enough that the hall was well filled
-with marketmen and truckmen, and other laboring men, who, in those days,
-all supposed that a “nigger” was the most despicable creature in the
-world, excepting that an “Abolitionist” was worse. Austin never spared
-invective, and he used it on this occasion to denounce Lovejoy and those
-who abetted him.
-
-I doubt if Phillips knew he was going to speak when he went to the
-meeting. Indeed, it is quite sure, that Austin secured for him the
-attention of the unfriendly assembly. But he had not spoken long before
-he was sure of their audience.
-
-“I thought this floor would yawn open before the gentleman and swallow
-him up. I thought the pictured forms behind me here would step from their
-frames in horror at his words.” These are Phillips’s phrases, which in
-one form or another those men repeat who heard him.
-
-The meeting was pitilessly opposed to him and his. After a fashion a
-vote was obtained for all the resolutions of sympathy. But nobody cared
-whether they passed or not. Nobody heard Phillips that day who did not
-know that there was an orator in the town who could do much what he would
-with any audience.
-
-He spared nobody and no thing in his attack. He never did till the last
-hour of his life. And it is right to say, that the people he opposed,
-denounced and satirized, replied with the sneer so often lavished on
-such men, “He has a devil and is mad, why do you hear him?” “Phillips’s
-crazy talk” is the phrase you constantly find as you turn over private
-or published letters of those times. None the less did people go to
-hear him, and, as I said, he could do with an audience, friendly or
-unfriendly, much what he would. He seemed to be—I think he was—quite
-careless about preparation. If he was asked to speak for the cause,
-he spoke. He thus had, very soon, the best possible training for his
-business. If I am right, it is the only training worth much—namely,
-constant practice. I have never, in forty years, varied from the opinion
-I expressed the night I first heard him, that he was the best public
-speaker we had in New England, as he was the best I had heard anywhere.
-He had the double gift of language and of easy familiar gesture. He was
-absolutely at his ease. He talked with his audience, played with them,
-joked with them, reasoned with them, scolded them, ridiculed them,
-soothed them, flattered them and compelled them, just as he chose. He
-knew his audience through and through. He knew what speech to make
-to them. He was never guilty of that ghastly folly which insists on
-addressing to the audience of to-day the speech which pleased some other
-audience a week ago.
-
-I have no intention of writing his biography or an abridged history of
-the time in which he was so active. I think he did not long remain at
-the bar. I think it was as early as 1838 that he refused to take the
-attorney’s oath of allegiance to the United States, without which he
-could not practice in any United States Court. For the theory of the
-extreme Abolitionists was that they must break up the Constitution of the
-United States. But in practice very few of their adherents followed them
-fully here, and many a man who cordially supported their newspapers and
-their meetings, voted as he chose at the next election, or when the time
-came went loyally into battle for the old flag. Nay, of Phillips himself
-I remember this: I met him on the Sunday before Fort Sumter was fired
-upon, and we walked half a mile together. He had brought up town the
-last news from the bulletin about the preparations of the South Carolina
-batteries. I had been on the spot, on Sullivan’s Island, and pointed out
-some inconsistency in the narrative, saying, what I thought then, that I
-believed the whole thing would turn out to be mere Carolina bluster. To
-which he replied with great cordiality, “I am sure I hope so;” and from
-that moment to the end of the war I think no one enjoyed the national
-successes more thoroughly than he.
-
-Side by side with the Anti-Slavery excitement, which every one connects
-with his name, was the growth of what may fairly enough be called the
-“Lyceum Movement.” In the beginning this was thought as pure a piece of
-philanthropy as the other. Almost every public spirited man considered
-it his duty to have one or more “Lectures” which he should deliver at
-the call of his neighbors when they had a “Lyceum.” I have no doubt that
-Phillips’s early lecturing was a bit of philanthropic effort of this
-sort. But as things went on, enterprising committees began to raise the
-price of their tickets, to send for distant lecturers and to pay them
-enough to make it worth their while to come. Even college societies
-and the providers for Commencement entertainments found it wise to
-pay a handsome honorarium to their speakers, and I am afraid that the
-element of philanthropy has long since disappeared from what is called
-the “Lecture Platform.” Phillips had an ingenious way of uniting the
-functions of a literary and of a political lecturer. No one was in more
-demand than he for the regular work of the winter Lyceums. But it would
-often happen that the timidity of a committee made them pause before they
-would listen to his radicalism in a lecture. For such agents he was quite
-ready. If people had scruples they must pay for them. His program was:
-“For a literary lecture without politics, $100 and my expenses.” “For a
-political lecture, nothing, and I pay my fares.”
-
-He used to tell a story of his arrival at a western city where the
-committee were divided, four to four, on the question whether they would
-hear his lecture on the “Lost Arts” or a political speech. Perhaps he
-would determine between them.
-
-“Let us have both,” said Phillips. To which they eagerly assented. So
-he delivered the “Lost Arts” first, innocent as a new rosebud of any
-political bias. Then a recess was given to the audience, and all who
-wished to go might go. But of course, after that beginning, no one went.
-And so Phillips had another hour, and an audience for as many heresies as
-he chose to utter.
-
-It ought to be remembered that as soon as he had any leisure from his
-work as an Anti-Slavery agitator, he gave his time and power, in the same
-open-handed way, to the temperance cause. In all these late years the
-friends of temperance reform have had no public man more ready to take up
-their work for them than he.
-
-The country has shown that it can duly honor such an agitator, whose own
-conscience was always clear, even though no man could agree with him in
-what he called opinions. The truth is, they were as often impulses as
-convictions. But in the matter of slavery, of temperance, and of charity,
-he had settled convictions, and lived on them without flinching. He was
-utterly without thought of self.
-
-The public has never known nor said enough of Mr. Phillips’s private
-charities, and I can not wonder at it. It is impossible for any one
-to speak fitly of them this side of the recording angel. Throughout
-the world Mr. Phillips had a reputation as helper of the oppressed,
-and with this reputation, the other, more dangerous to the comfort
-of its possessor, that he cared nothing for popularity, and that he
-acted from his own knowledge and will alone, and without regard to the
-recommendations of anybody. Thus it was natural that every wanderer,
-every outcast, of every color or nation, when he might find himself in
-need in Boston went first to Mr. Phillips’s door, and that he should
-find the door always open to him. He gave lavishly whenever he thought
-he ought to give, not only of his time but of his money; exactly how
-much no one but himself ever knew. His house became a sort of bureau of
-charity, investigation and relief, so that whenever man, woman or child
-was not known at the overseers of the poor, at the “Provident,” or at the
-“Associated Charities,” it was the more certain that he was known at Mr.
-Phillips’s. He gave his alms literally to all sorts and conditions of men.
-
-That would be a very queer world—and it would be hard to say how it would
-fare—which should be made up of Wendell Phillipses. But this may be
-fairly said—that one such man in a community like that of New England,
-renders essential service. In his case, while there were thousands
-who hated him, other thousands loved him—and the thousands who loved,
-lived much nearer to him, and knew him a thousand times better than the
-thousands who hated.
-
-
-
-
-HESITATION AND ERRORS IN SPEECH.
-
-By J. MORTIMER-GRANVILLE.
-
-
-Speech is, in a practical sense, more than the mere instrument of
-thought. It is so far an essential part of the faculty or function of
-“thinking,” that little beyond a simple recognition of the impressions
-received through the sensations can be accomplished without the aid of
-language—at least in one of its elementary forms. Thought and speech
-are so connected, that it is impossible to separate them. It is not a
-necessity that speech should be articulate and audible. It may be set
-in any key, from the loudest voice-utterance to the mere self-conscious
-conception of certain sounds, as when a person _thinks_ the pronunciation
-of a word, clearly marking its peculiarities in his own mind, but in
-a manner imperceptible to any one else. If the performance of this
-act—pronouncing a word in thought—be closely examined, it will be found
-that there is an impulse, as it were, to move the lips and tongue, but so
-restrained, that commonly no obvious muscular action takes place. There
-are exceptions to this limitation which not only prove the rule, but show
-how intimately thoughts and actions are connected.
-
-In sleep, during dreams, and in the case of some persons, especially
-the aged and feeble-minded, when awake, the lips move with nearly
-every thought, though no audible sound is emitted. When the restraint,
-normally exercised, is less forcible, or the impulse stronger, the
-thinker involuntarily speaks his thoughts; and comical stories are
-told of persons who have betrayed their real sentiments inopportunely
-by this process of thought-speaking. Faults in speech are, therefore,
-likely to be due to defects in thought, the two faculties being mutually
-dependent; or the reverse may be the case, and impediments and errors
-of speech react mischievously on the mind. Much interest and importance
-attach to the conclusion arrived at with respect to the real cause of the
-hesitation or error which marks the utterance of any particular sufferer.
-
-First, make quite sure that it is not ordinary confusion of thought,
-consequent upon a slovenly habit of thinking or the miserable practice of
-allowing thoughts to drift, which has produced the faltering or mistake
-that occasions anxiety. Many persons permit their minds to become overrun
-with tangled scrub, so that nothing short of the most acute or agile
-powers of way-finding can carry a thought safely through the domain, and
-then they complain of the difficulty of thought-driving! Clear away the
-jungle that renders the mind impassable, and thought will no longer be
-found to wander by circuitous paths, and too often be irrecoverably lost.
-The only measure by which this self-improvement can be accomplished is
-one of culture; the degree of labor required will vary from that of a
-settler in the backwoods, who finds it necessary to clear and dig every
-square yard of the land he would convert to useful purposes, to the
-ordinary weeding and breaking the clods which may suffice to repair the
-results of a single season of neglect. In any event, however great or
-small the task may be, the cultivation must be accomplished, or this, the
-most troublesome and inconvenient cause of speech-blundering, a weedy,
-tangled, and lumpy state of mind can not be remedied. We are not now
-concerned with faults of the motor apparatus or mechanism of the voice;
-and, excluding these, it maybe asserted that, of all causes of hesitation
-or error in speech which lie, so to say, deeper than the surface, the
-neglect of self-control in thought is the most common and, in many
-senses, the most mischievous.
-
-If a person who has previously been an easy and fluent speaker begins
-to hesitate in his utterance, there is generally reason for anxiety.
-Supposing the general health to be good, and nothing specially notable
-to have happened in the life of the individual which might have produced
-what is commonly called a “shock” to the mind or the nervous system,
-there is probably some physical or mental disorder in the background,
-to which attention should be directed. If the cause be physical, the
-attempt to speak will generally be accompanied by trembling or twitching
-in the muscles of the mouth, the lips, the nose, or the jaw. Should any
-such symptom be perceptible to friends, or self-detected, it will be
-wise to seek medical advice without delay, because it may be produced
-by conditions the most important, or comparatively trivial, and no one
-except a skilled practitioner can determine from which of several sources
-the agitation springs; whether it indicates mere weakness or serious
-disease.
-
-Commonly, when there is none of this trembling or twitching, and
-sometimes even when these are present, the hesitation is mental. Either
-the mind is too busy with a crowd of thoughts to maintain proper command
-of the word-finding function, or that faculty is so enfeebled that it
-seems incapable of any reasonable activity in the service of the will.
-It is quick enough in the response to influences which have no right
-to usurp control, but when the master-spirit of thought, the judgment
-ruling by the will, issues a mandate, the faculty is powerless to obey.
-This comes of a riotous or vicious habit of thinking. The mind-weakness
-which results from the terrible error of mental dissipation, whatever
-the direction in which the thoughts are permitted to disport themselves,
-is one of the most perilous conditions of exhaustion into which the
-faculties of a still sound brain can be allowed to sink. It is a state of
-which the mind in danger is itself conscious long before any indication
-becomes recognizable by others. Hesitation in speech is one of the
-earliest external symptoms which indicate this malady, but when that
-occurs, the weakening power has generally been in secret operation for a
-length of time sufficient to accomplish serious mischief. It is not, as
-a matter of fact, too late to mend matters; but the individual who has
-permitted his mind to pass into this condition has incurred a great peril.
-
-This is a point on which it is necessary to speak plainly. Habits of
-musing, brooding, or conjuring up mental pictures and scenes in which
-the thinker is himself an actor, and into which he gradually brings his
-faculties of imagination, and even his sensations, are the overlooked,
-the unconfessed, perhaps the unrecognized, causes of by far the larger
-number of attacks of “insanity.” And; though it seems cruel to say
-so, the great majority of poor creatures, especially the younger and
-middle-aged persons, who with wrecked minds drag out weary years in
-lunatic asylums have themselves to thank for the experience. Any one
-of a score of existing causes may overbalance the mind or occasion the
-outbreak and determine the particular form the mind-malady ultimately
-assumes; but the predisposing cause which renders the disaster possible
-and entails all the evil consequences is the morbid habit of allowing the
-thoughts to wander uncontrolled, at first innocently, then in forbidden
-paths, and finally wherever the haunting demon of the inner life, a man’s
-worse nature, his evil self, may lure or drive them!
-
-The habit of preoccupation which sometimes shows itself by hesitation in
-speech is less dangerous than weakness, but it should not be neglected.
-Having “too much to think about” is not so bad as having exhausted the
-power of voluntary thought, but it is an evil. “Too much” does not always
-mean more than the mind _ought_ to be able to receive and deal with.
-It is quite as often too much for the defective discipline of thought
-maintained, as really more than a due quantity for the mind engaged if
-the business of thinking were properly conducted. There is a marked
-tendency in modern education—and it increases each year—to neglect
-the training of minds. The subjects which were principally useful for
-purposes of mental development and exercise are being eliminated because
-they do not commend themselves to the commercial instinct of the day as
-producing marketable information. Greek, Latin, mathematics, and the
-like, are not possessed of a high value in the mart of commerce or on
-’Change, and they are therefore lightly estimated.
-
-We are beginning to reap the fruit of this time-serving policy in
-education, and it takes the form of a general break-down of young minds
-when set to any duty which involves dealing with a crowd of thoughts at
-once. The untrained and disorderly thinker can not choose his words, he
-has “no time” to arrange them, and can seldom find them when wanted.
-He is “thinking of something else.” It has come to be thought rather
-clever to be “abstracted,” and “so engrossed,” “with many things to
-think about!” These are the pitiful excuses offered by a generation of
-incompetent and confused thinkers when their speech betrays them. A
-clever talker will often bridge over the gap between two right words in
-place of interposing a wrong one. It is amusing and, in a certain sense,
-interesting to notice how admirably this is done by self-possessed though
-confused speakers; but the evil of disorderly thought lurks behind, and
-may be detected through the flimsy, though ingenious, artifice.
-
-The remedy for a growing hesitancy in speech, when not the result of
-serious mind-weakness—and the person affected is generally secretly
-conscious of the cause—is a better method of thinking. The first effort
-must be to preserve greater calmness; the second, to be more orderly
-in thought. There is a process in thinking which is the counterpart of
-dotting the _i_’s and putting in the stops in writing, or of knotting the
-thread and “fastening off” securely in needlework. If this be neglected,
-as it commonly is by what are called rapid—another word for careless,
-reckless, or impetuous—thinkers, entanglement and confusion in thought,
-showing themselves in hesitation and errors of speech, are inevitable.
-
-Verbal blunders are generally due to confusions of thought, but sometimes
-to disease. It is important to distinguish between the two varieties of
-this fault. The former is a matter for self-improvement, the latter will
-require medical aid. If the mistakes made seem to follow no particular
-line of error—if they are, so to say, general or capricious, the
-wrong words substituted for what it was wished to say being taken at
-random, perhaps from some other sentence at the moment darting across
-the mind—the “confusion” may be safely set down as one to be cured by
-mind-discipline. If, on the contrary, particular words, previously
-familiar and ready at hand, are forgotten, certain numbers dropped out of
-memory, and a sort of method seems to determine the occurrence of faults
-in speaking or writing, the matter may be more serious, and advice should
-be sought. It is a curious feature of the early forms of speech-disorder
-springing from physical sources—for example, incipient disease of the
-brain—that particular elements of knowledge seem to be effaced, and
-special processes of thought or reasoning can no longer be performed,
-although the great mass of mind-work goes on unimpaired.
-
-A world of trouble would be saved if, in all mental derangements, apart
-from brain-disease, persons who feel things going amiss with them (and I
-am convinced this premonition of mind-disorder is a common experience),
-whether the sensation be one of “irritability” or of “confusion,” would
-undertake of their own free motive, to cure the evil by subjecting the
-consciousness to a regular course of training. The best plan is to
-set the mind a daily task of reading, not too long, but sufficiently
-difficult to give the thoughts full employment while they are engaged.
-This should be performed at fixed hours. Perfect regularity is essential,
-because the object is to restore the rhythm of the mind and brace it up
-to higher tension. When, as in the class of cases we are considering,
-hesitation and errors in speech are the characteristic symptoms of a
-break-down or impaired vigor of mind, much good will often be done by
-reading aloud for an hour or more daily to the family.
-
-It is not only useless but harmful to read aloud when alone; the mind
-conjures up an imaginary audience, and this habit of “conjuring up”
-things is one of the short cuts to insanity which should be carefully
-avoided, more particularly by those who are most expert in the
-exercise—the highly imaginative. Another drawback consists in the fact
-that when a person reads aloud, without a real audience to engross that
-portion of the thoughts which will wander from the subject, the mind
-becomes engaged with the sound of the voice through the faculty of
-hearing; and this paves the way for other mischief. It is by gradually
-substituting in fancy, and then mistaking, their own voices for those of
-other beings that the weak and morbidly-minded become impressed with the
-notion that they are honored or plagued, as the mood may determine, with
-communications, super-or extra-natural—which are in truth the echoes of
-their own imaginary utterances.
-
-By reading aloud any healthy and improving work which is so interesting
-as to engage the thoughts, the strained connections between thought
-and speech will be relieved. Properly employed, this is one of the
-most patent and effective of remedies for disorders of the faculty of
-speech; but it is essential to success in the experiment of self-cure
-that the book read should be of a nature to interest, and sufficiently
-difficult to hold the attention. In some cases the exercise is rendered
-more effectual by reading aloud in one language from a work written in
-another—for example, a French book to an English audience. This gives
-practice in the choice of words, and brings the memory into play, the two
-faculties it is desired to develop and strengthen. Hesitation and errors
-in speech are of great moment, view them as we may. In their less serious
-forms they demand a vigorous effort for self-improvement; in their more
-grave varieties they portend the existence of perils to brain and mind.
-
-
-
-
-ASTRONOMY OF THE HEAVENS FOR MAY.
-
-By PROF. M. B. GOFF.
-
-
-THE SUN.
-
-Although, as mentioned last month, the sun gives out such a vast amount
-of heat and light, we must remember that these are sent out in all
-directions, and that we receive comparatively a very small portion. The
-best estimates make our part one twenty-three-hundred-millionths of the
-whole. But this quantity is no trifling matter, and its effects are not
-to be overlooked. Speaking of the general effect of the sun’s influence,
-Prof. Lockyer puts it in this way: “The enormous engines which do the
-heavy work of the world—the locomotives which take us so smoothly and
-rapidly across a whole continent—the mail packets which bear us so safely
-over the broad ocean—owe all their power to steam; and steam is produced
-by heating water by coal. We all know that coal is the product of an
-ancient vegetation; and vegetation is the direct effect of the sun’s
-action. Hence without the sun’s action in former times, we should have
-had no coal. The heavy work of the world is, therefore, indirectly done
-by the sun. Now for the light work. Let us take man. To work, a man must
-eat; does he eat beef? On what was the animal which supplied the beef
-fed? On grass. Does he eat bread? Of what is bread made? Of the flour
-of wheat and other grains. In these, and in all cases, we come back to
-vegetation, which is the direct effect of the sun’s action. Here again,
-then, we must confess that to the sun is due man’s power of work. In
-fact, all the world’s work, with the trifling exception of tide-work,
-is done by the sun; and man himself, prince or peasant, is but a little
-engine, which merely directs the energy supplied by the sun.” The use of
-the sun as a time-piece is perhaps more frequently thought of than any
-other, since its value is constantly presenting itself. Each day, as noon
-approaches, the question occurs, “How is the time?” and when possible,
-the time of crossing the meridian is compared with that exhibited by the
-clock. For this month, on the 1st, noon by the sun occurs at 11:57 a.
-m. clock time; on the 15th, at 11:56 a. m.; on the 31st, at 11:57½ a. m.
-Another method, though not very accurate, of determining time, is the
-noting of the rising and setting of the sun. One difficulty here would
-be the obtaining of a good horizon, such for example, as could be had at
-sea. The following times answer very well for most parts of the United
-States and Canada: On the 1st sun rises at 5:02 a. m. and sets at 6:52
-p. m.; daybreak occurs at 4:08 a. m., and twilight ends at 8:46 p. m.;
-on the 15th, sun rises at 4:48 a. m., sets at 7:05 p. m.; daybreak at
-2:44 a. m., and end of twilight at 9:09 p. m.; and on the 31st, sun rises
-at 4:37 a. m., and sets at 7:17 p. m.; daybreak occurs 2:24 a. m., and
-twilight ends 9:30 p. m. During the month the days increase in length
-some fifty minutes. On the 31st the sun reaches its highest elevation
-above the horizon, which in latitude 41° 30′ north is 70° 33′, nearly.
-As we are now moving away from the sun, its apparent diameter diminishes
-from 31′ 48″ to 31′ 37″.
-
-
-THE MOON
-
-Presents the following changes: First quarter at 59 minutes past twelve
-on the morning of the 2d; full moon on the 9th, at 10:59 p. m.; last
-quarter on the 17th, at 11:46 in the evening; new moon on the 24th, at
-5:28 p. m.; and first quarter again on the 31st, at 11:48 a. m. On the
-31st she sets at 12:12 a. m.; on the 15th, rises at 11:25 p. m.; on the
-31st, sets at 12:06 a. m. On the meridian, 1st at 5:56¼ p. m.; on the
-15th, at 3:58 a. m.; on 30th, at 5:30 p. m. Farthest from the earth, 10th
-at 7:24 p. m.; nearest the earth on 24th, at 1:36 p. m. Highest point
-above the horizon on 26th, which in latitude 41° 30′ north, is 67° 17′;
-and lowest on the 24th, 29° 45′.
-
-
-MERCURY
-
-Will be visible for a few evenings during the first of the month, setting
-on the 1st at 8:33, one hour and forty minutes after the sun; on the
-15th, sets at 7:20 p. m.; and on the 31st at 5:43 p. m. Its diameter
-increases from 9.2″ on the 1st to 12″ on the 15th, and then diminishes
-to 10.6″ on the 30th. On the 5th, about midnight, and again on the 30th
-about 3:00 p. m., it is stationary. At 5:00 p. m. on the 17th it is at
-its inferior conjunction, that is, on a line or nearly so, with the
-earth and sun, and between these latter bodies. On the 24th, at 1:37 a.
-m., it will be only one minute of arc south of the moon, but as both it
-and the moon will at that hour be below our horizon, we can not see the
-conjunction. On the same date it reaches its greatest distance (aphelion)
-from the sun.
-
-
-VENUS
-
-During this month (on the 2d about 5 p. m.) reaches its greatest eastern
-elongation, and will then be 45° 33′ from the sun. One might suppose that
-at this time the planet would appear to us the brightest; but this is not
-the case. The surface seen, though a greater portion of the disk than
-is visible thirty-two days later, is rendered less brilliant on account
-of its greater distance, and hence we find that the period of greatest
-brilliancy does not occur in this instance until the 3d of June. From
-the 1st to the 30th the diameter of Venus increases from 23.6″ to 34.6″,
-an increase of 11″, or about 50 per cent. It will set as follows: On the
-1st, at 10:49; on the 15th, at 10:49; and on the 30th, at 10:40 p. m. On
-the 27th, at 7:54 p. m., is 8° 7′ north of the moon.
-
-
-MARS,
-
-The fourth planet in distance from the sun, and, next to Venus, the one
-that comes nearest to the earth, has also to the latter some points of
-resemblance. Not that it is like it in size; for in fact, it is not more
-than about one-eighth as large; nor yet in the length of its year, which
-is nearly twice as long as one of our years (about 687 of our days).
-But it has about its equatorial regions, light and dark portions, which
-are generally admitted to be continents and oceans, whose distribution
-appears very much like that of the land and water on the earth’s surface.
-About the poles also appear during the planet’s winter brilliant white
-portions, which disappear during its summer. This is probably occasioned
-by the fall of snow in winter, and its melting in the spring and
-summer. Again, its time of revolution on its axis, which has been quite
-satisfactorily determined, and, indeed, much more accurately than that
-of any other planet, is shown to be 24 hours, 37 minutes, 23 seconds
-very nearly, making its days and nights very much like our own. Its
-seasons also resemble ours somewhat, though longer and subject to greater
-extremes of heat and cold. The inclination of the equator of Mars to the
-plane of its orbit is about 27°, or 3½° more than that of the earth;
-and its year being nearly twice as long and its orbit more eccentric,
-make the seasons in its northern hemisphere about as follows: Spring
-191⅓ days, summer 181 days, autumn 149⅓, and winter 147 days (of the
-planet). When nearest to us, its apparent diameter is about seven times
-as great as when farthest away. These distances are in round numbers
-35 and 247 millions of miles respectively. It appears brightest to us
-of course, when in opposition, that is, when we are between it and the
-sun, its distance from the earth at these periods varying from 35 to 62
-millions of miles, making it seem four times as bright at the former as
-at the latter distance. On account of the inclination of the equator
-to the orbit, we can see 27° beyond the north pole at conjunction, and
-27° beyond its south pole at opposition; hence astronomers are much
-better acquainted with its southern than with its northern regions. It
-is believed that Mars has not only land, water and snow, but also clouds
-and mists. The land is generally reddish when the planet’s atmosphere is
-clear; this is owing to the absorption of the atmosphere, as is the color
-of the setting sun with us. The water appears of a greenish tinge. Of
-this planet we have to report for this month, that it is decreasing in
-interest. Its diameter diminishes from 7.8″ to 6.6″. On the 2d it sets at
-1:34 a. m.; on the 16th, at 12:55 a. m.; and on the 31st, at 12:13 a. m.
-On the 2d, at 9:01 a. m., it is 7° 9′ north of the moon; on the 5th, at
-midnight, 90° east of the sun; on the 30th, at 3:20 p. m., is again in
-conjunction with and 5° 50′ north of moon; and on the 31st, at 11:00 a.
-m., is 58′ north of _Alpha Leonis_.
-
-
-JUPITER,
-
-“The greatest of the planets,” retains his position as an evening star,
-setting at the following times: On the 2d, at 12:34 a. m.; on the 15th,
-at 11:45 p. m.; on the 30th, at 10:54 p. m. His motion during the month
-is direct, and amounts to 4° 39′ 34″. His diameter diminishes 2.4″, being
-34.4″ on the 1st, and 32″ on the 31st. He is in conjunction twice with
-the moon; on the 1st, at 12:21 a. m., when he is 5° 58′, and on the 28th,
-at 3:42 p. m., when he is 5° 49′ to the north of our satellite.
-
-
-SATURN
-
-Makes this month a direct motion of four degrees and two seconds of arc,
-a greater advance than he has made for several months. He rises after
-daylight and sets on the 1st at 9:06 p. m., on the 15th at 8:19 p. m.,
-and on the 30th at 7:29 p. m.
-
-
-URANUS
-
-Has a mean distance from the sun of 1770 millions of miles, and makes one
-revolution in 84.02 years. To find it readily it is necessary to know
-its right ascension and declination, which for the 1st, 15th and 30th
-are in order as follows: Right ascension 11h. 40m. 35.92s., declination,
-2° 57′ 8.4″ north; right ascension, 11h. 39m. 36s., declination, 3° 3′
-1.5″ north; right ascension, 11h. 39m. 11.54s., declination, 3° 4′ 58.3″
-north. Will be evening star throughout the month, setting as follows: On
-the 2d, at 3:09 a. m.; on the 16th, at 2:13 a. m.; and on the 31st, at
-1:14 a. m. Its motion will be retrograde, amounting to 24′ 7.2″. Diameter
-on 1st, 3.8″, and on the 31st, 3.6″. On the 5th at 10:33 a. m., 3° 29′
-north of moon; and on 31st, at 9:00 a. m., stationary.
-
-
-NEPTUNE,
-
-The “Far-away,” remains close to the sun, as can be seen by comparing
-their times of rising and setting. The rising of Neptune occurs on the
-1st, at 5:37 a. m.; on the 15th, at 4:43 a. m.; and on the 30th, at 3:47
-a. m.; and the setting on the same dates in the same order at 7:31, 6:39
-and 5:43 p. m.
-
-
-
-
-THE AMUSEMENTS OF THE LONDON POOR.
-
-By WALTER BESANT.
-
-
-Everybody knows, in general terms, how the English working classes amuse
-themselves. Let us, however, set down the exact facts, so far as we can
-get at them, and consider them. First, it must be remembered that the
-workman of the present day possesses an accomplishment, or a weapon,
-which was denied to his fathers—_he can read_. That possession ought
-to open a boundless field; but it has not yet done so, for the simple
-reason that we have entirely forgotten to give the working man anything
-to read. This, if any, is a case in which the supply should have preceded
-and created the demand. Books are dear; beside, if a man wants to buy
-books, there is no one to guide him or tell him what he should get.
-Suppose, for instance, a studious workingman anxious to teach himself
-natural history, how is he to know the best, latest, and most trustworthy
-books? And so for every branch of learning. Secondly, there are no
-free libraries to speak of; I find in London one for Camden Town, one
-for Bethnal Green, one for South London, one for Notting Hill, one for
-Westminster, and one for the City; and this seems to exhaust the list.
-It would be interesting to know the daily average of evening visitors
-at these libraries. There are three millions of the working classes in
-London; there is, therefore, one free library for every half million, or,
-leaving out a whole three-fourths in order to allow for the children and
-the old people and those who are wanted at home, there is one library
-for every 125,000 people. The accommodation does not seem liberal, but
-one has as yet heard no complaints of overcrowding. It may be said,
-however, that the workman reads his paper regularly. That is quite true.
-The paper which he most loves is red hot on politics; and its readers
-are assumed to be politicians of the type which considers the millennium
-only delayed by the existence of the Church, the House of Lords, and a
-few other institutions. Yet our English workingman is not a firebrand,
-and though he listens to an immense quantity of fiery oratory, and reads
-endless fiery articles, he has the good sense to perceive that none of
-the destructive measures recommended by his friends are likely to improve
-his own wages or reduce the price of food. It is unfortunate that the
-favorite and popular papers, which might instruct the people in so many
-important matters—such as the growth, extent, and nature of the trades
-by which they live, the meaning of the word Constitution, the history of
-the British Empire, the rise and development of our liberties, and so
-forth—teach little or nothing on these or any other points.
-
-If the workman does not read, however, he talks. At present he talks for
-the most part on the pavement and in public houses, but there is every
-indication that we shall see before long a rapid growth of workmen’s
-clubs—not the tea-and-coffee make-believes set up by the well meaning,
-but honest, independent clubs, in every respect such as those in Pall
-Mall, managed by the workmen themselves. Meantime, there is the public
-house for a club, and perhaps the workman spends, night after night, more
-than he should, upon beer. Let us remember, if he needs excuse, that his
-employers have found him no better place and no better amusement than to
-sit in a tavern, drink beer (generally in moderation), and talk and smoke
-tobacco.
-
-Another magnificent gift he has obtained of late years—the excursion
-train and the cheap steamboat. For a small sum he can get far away
-from the close and smoky town, to the seaside perhaps, but certainly
-to the fields and country air; he can make of every fine Sunday in the
-summer a holiday indeed. Again, for those who can not afford the country
-excursion, there is now a park accessible from almost every quarter. And
-I seriously recommend to all those who are inclined to take a gloomy view
-concerning their fellow creatures, and the mischievous and dangerous
-tendencies of the lower classes, to pay a visit to Battersea Park on any
-Sunday evening in the summer.
-
-As regards the workingman’s theatrical tastes, they lean, so far as they
-go, to the melodrama; but as a matter of fact there are great masses of
-working people who never go to the theater at all. Music halls there
-are, certainly, and these provide shows more or less dramatic, and,
-though they are not so numerous as might have been expected, they form
-a considerable part of the amusements of the people; it is therefore a
-thousand pities that among the “topical” songs, the breakdowns, and the
-comic songs, room has never been found for part-songs or for music of
-a quiet and somewhat better kind. The proprietors doubtless know their
-audience, but wherever the Kyrle Society has given concerts to working
-people they have succeeded in interesting them by music and songs of a
-kind to which they are not accustomed in their music halls.
-
-The theater, the music hall, the public house, the Sunday excursion, the
-parks—these seem almost to exhaust the list of amusement. There are also,
-however, the suburban gardens, such as North Woolwich and Rosherville,
-where there are entertainments of all kinds, and dancing; there are the
-tea-gardens all round London; there are such places of resort as Kew and
-Hampton Court, Bushey, Burnham Beeches, Epping, Hainault and Rye House.
-There are also the harmonic meetings, the free-and-easy evenings, and the
-friendly leads at the public houses.
-
-As regards the women, I declare that I have never been able to find
-out anything at all concerning their amusements. Certainly one can see
-a few of them any Sunday walking about in the lanes and in the fields
-of northern London, with their lovers; in the evening they may also be
-observed having tea in the tea-gardens. These, however, are the better
-sort of girls; they are well dressed, and generally quiet in their
-behavior. The domestic servants, for the most part, spend their “evening
-out” in taking tea with other servants, whose evening is in. On the same
-principle, an actor, when he has a holiday, goes to another theater; and
-no doubt it must be interesting for a cook to observe the _differentiæ_,
-the finer shades of difference, in the conduct of a kitchen. When women
-are married and the cares of maternity set in, one does not see how they
-can get any holiday or recreation at all; but I believe a good deal is
-done for their amusement by the mothers’ meetings and other clerical
-agencies. There is, however, below the shopgirls, the dressmakers, the
-servants, and the working girls, whom the world, so to speak, knows,
-a very large class of women whom the world does not know, and is not
-anxious to know. They are the factory hands of London; you can see
-them, if you wish, trooping out of the factories and places where they
-work on any Saturday afternoon, and thus get them, so to speak, in the
-lump. Their amusement seems to consist of nothing but walking about the
-streets, two and three abreast, and they laugh and shout as they go so
-noisily that they must needs be extraordinarily happy. These girls are,
-I am told, for the most part so ignorant and helpless, that many of them
-do not know even how to use a needle; they can not read, or if they can,
-they never do; they carry the virtue of independence as far as they are
-able; and insist on living by themselves, two sharing a single room;
-nor will they brook the least interference with their freedom, even
-from those who try to help them. Who are their friends, what becomes of
-them in the end, why they all seem to be about eighteen years of age,
-at what period of life they begin to get tired of walking up and down
-the streets, who their sweethearts are, what are their thoughts, what
-are their hopes—these are questions which no man can answer, because no
-man could make them communicate their experiences and opinions. Perhaps
-only a Bible-woman or two knows the history, and could tell it, of the
-London factory girl. Their pay is said to be wretched, whatever work they
-do; their food, I am told, is insufficient for young and hearty girls,
-consisting generally of tea and bread or bread and butter for breakfast
-and supper, and for dinner a lump of fried fish and a piece of bread.
-What can be done? The proprietors of the factory will give no better
-wages, the girls can not combine, and there is no one to help them. One
-would not willingly add another to the “rights” of man or woman; but
-surely, if there is such a thing at all as a “right,” it is that a day’s
-labor shall earn enough to pay for sufficient food, for shelter, and for
-clothes. As for the amusements of these girls, it is a thing which may
-be considered when something has been done for their material condition.
-The possibility of amusement only begins when we have reached the level
-of the well-fed. Great Gaster will let no one enjoy play who is hungry.
-Would it be possible, one asks in curiosity, to stop the noisy and
-mirthless laughter of these girls with a hot supper of chops fresh from
-the grill? Would they, if they were first well fed, incline their hearts
-to rest, reflection, instruction, and a little music?
-
-The cheap excursions, the school feasts, the concerts given for
-the people, the increased brightness of religious services, the
-bank holidays, the Saturday half holidays, all point to the gradual
-recognition of the great natural law that men and women, as well as boys
-and girls, must have play. At the present moment we have just arrived
-at the stage of acknowledging this law; the next step will be that of
-respecting it, and preparing to obey it; just now we are willing and
-anxious that all should play; and it grieves us to see that in their
-leisure hours the people do not play because they do not know how.
-
-Compare, for instance, the young workman with the young gentleman—the
-public schoolman, one of the kind who makes his life as “all round” as
-he can, and learns and practices whatever his hand findeth to do. Or,
-if you please, compare him with one of the better sort of young city
-clerks; or, again, compare him with one of the lads who belong to the
-classes now held in the building of the old Polytechnic; or with the
-lads who are found every evening at the classes of the Birkbeck. First
-of all, the young workman can not play any game at all; neither cricket,
-football, tennis, racquets, fives, or any of the other games which the
-young fellows in the class above him love so passionately; there are,
-in fact, no places for him where these games can be played; for though
-the boys may play cricket in Victoria Park, I do not understand that the
-carpenters, shoemakers, or painters have got clubs and play there too.
-There is no gymnasium for them, and so they never know the use of their
-limbs; they can not row, though they have a splendid river to row upon;
-they can not box, fence, wrestle, play single-stick, or shoot with the
-rifle; they do not, as a rule, join the volunteer corps; they do not
-run, leap, or practice athletics of any kind; they can not swim; they
-can not sing in parts, unless, which is naturally rare, they belong to
-a church choir; they can not play any kind of instrument—to be sure the
-public school boy is generally groveling in the same shameful ignorance
-of music. They never read. Think what it must be to be shut out entirely
-from the world of history, philosophy, poetry, fiction, essays and
-travels! Yet our working classes are thus practically excluded. Partly
-they have done this for themselves, because they have never felt the
-desire to read books; partly, as I said above, we have done it for
-them, because we have never taken any steps to create the demand. Now
-as regards these arts and accomplishments, the public schoolman and
-the better class city clerk have the chance of learning some of them,
-at least, and of practicing them both before and after they have left
-school. What a poor creature would that young man seem who could do
-none of these things! Yet the workingman has no chance of learning any.
-There are no teachers for him; the schools for the small arts, the
-accomplishments, and the graces of life are not open to him. In other
-words, the public schoolman has gone through a mill of discipline out
-of school as well as in. Law reigns in his sports as in his studies.
-Whether he sits over his books or plays in the fields, he learns to be
-obedient to law, order, and rule; he obeys, and expects to be obeyed;
-it is not himself whom he must study to please; it is the whole body
-of his fellows. And this discipline of self, much more useful than the
-discipline of books, the young workman knows not. Worse than this, and
-worst of all, not only is he unable to do any of these things, but he is
-even ignorant of their uses and their pleasures, and has no desire to
-learn any of them, and does not suspect at all that the possession of
-these accomplishments would multiply the joys of life. He is content to
-go on without them. Now contentment is the most mischievous of all the
-virtues; if anything is to be done, any improvement is to be effected,
-the wickedness of discontent must first be introduced.
-
-Let us, if you please, brighten this gloomy picture by recognizing the
-existence of the artisan who pursues knowledge for its own sake. There
-are many of this kind. You may come across some of them botanizing,
-collecting insects, moths and butterflies in the fields on Sundays;
-others you will find reading works on astronomy, geometry, physics, or
-electricity; they have not gone through the early training, and so they
-often make blunders; but yet they are real students. One of them I knew
-once who had taught himself Hebrew; another, who read so much about
-coöperation, that he lifted himself clean out of the coöperative ranks,
-and is now a master; another, and yet another and another, who read
-perpetually, and meditate upon, books of political and social economy;
-and there are thousands whose lives are made dignified for them, and
-sacred, by the continual meditation on religious things. Let us make
-every kind of allowance for these students of the working class; and let
-us not forget, as well, the occasional appearance of those heaven-born
-artists who are fain to play music or die, and presently get into
-orchestras of one kind or another, and so leave the ranks of daily labor
-and join the great clan or caste of musicians, who are a race or family
-apart, and carry on their mystery from father to son.
-
-But, as regards any place or institution where the people may learn or
-practice or be taught the beauty and desirability of any of the commoner
-amusements, arts, and accomplishments, there is not one, anywhere in
-London. The Bethnal Green Museum certainly proposed unto itself, at
-first, to “do something,” in a vague and uncertain way, for the people.
-Nobody dared to say that it would be first of all necessary to make the
-people discontented, because this would have been considered as flying in
-the face of Providence; and there was, beside, a sort of nebulous hope,
-not strong enough for a theory, that by dint of long gazing upon vases
-and tapestry everybody would in time acquire a true feeling for art, and
-begin to crave for culture. Many very beautiful things have, from time
-to time, been sent there—pictures, collections, priceless vases; and I
-am sure that those visitors who brought with them the sense of beauty
-and feeling for artistic work which comes of culture, have carried away
-memories and lessons which will last them for a lifetime. On the other
-hand, to those who visit the Museum chiefly in order to see the people,
-it has long been painfully evident that the folk who do not bring that
-sense with them go away carrying nothing of it home with them. Nothing at
-all. Those glass cases, those pictures, those big jugs, say no more to
-the crowd than a cuneiform or a Hittite inscription. They have now, or
-had quite recently, on exhibition, a collection of turnips and carrots
-beautifully modeled in wax; it is perhaps hoped that the contemplation of
-these precious but homely things may carry the people a step farther in
-the direction of culture than pictures could effect. In fact, the Bethnal
-Green Museum does no more to educate the people than the British Museum.
-It is to them simply a collection of curious things which is sometimes
-changed. It is cold and dumb. It is merely an unintelligent branch of
-a department; and it will remain so, because whatever the collection
-may be, a museum can teach nothing, unless there is some one to expound
-the meaning of the things. Is it possible that, by any persuasion,
-attraction, or teaching, the working-men of this country can be induced
-to aim at those organized, highly skilled, and disciplined forms of
-recreation which make up the better pleasure of life? Will they consent,
-without hope of gain, to give the labor, patience and practice required
-of every man who would become master of any art or accomplishment, or
-even any game? There are men, one is happy to find, who think that it is
-not only possible, but even easy, to effect this, and the thing is about
-to be transferred from the region of theory to that of practice, by the
-creation of the People’s Palace.
-
-Let me say a few words as to what this palace may and may not do. In the
-first place it can do nothing, absolutely nothing to relieve the great
-fringe of starvation and misery which lies all about London, but more
-especially at the East-end. People who are out of work and starving do
-not want amusement, not even of the highest kind; still less do they want
-university extension. Therefore, as regards the palace, let us forget
-for awhile the miserable condition of the very poor who live in East
-London; we are concerned only with the well fed, those who are in steady
-work, the respectable artisans and _petits commis_, the artists in the
-hundred little industries which are carried on in the East-end; those,
-in fact, who have already acquired some power of enjoyment because they
-are separated by a sensible distance from their hand-to-mouth brothers
-and sisters, and are pretty certain to-day that they will have enough to
-eat to-morrow. It is for these, and such as these, that the palace will
-be established. It is to contain: (1) class rooms, where all kinds of
-study can be carried on; (2) concert rooms; (3) conversation rooms; (4)
-a gymnasium; (5) a library; and lastly, a winter garden. In other words,
-it is to be an institution which will recognize the fact that for some
-of those who have to work all day at, perhaps, uncongenial and tedious
-labor, the best form of recreation may be study and intellectual effort;
-while for others, that is to say for the great majority—music, reading,
-tobacco, and rest will be desired. Let us be under no illusions as to
-the supposed thirst for knowledge. Those who desire to learn are even in
-youth always a minority. How many men do we know, among our own friends,
-who have ever set themselves to learn anything since they left school?
-It is a great mistake to suppose that the working man, any more than the
-merchant man, or the clerk man, or the tradesman, is ardently desirous of
-learning. But there will always be a few; and especially there are the
-young who would fain, if they could, make a ladder of learning, and so,
-as has ever been the goodly and godly custom in this realm of England,
-mount unto higher things. The palace of the people would be incomplete
-indeed if it gave no assistance to ambitious youths. Next to the classes
-in literature and science come those in music and painting. There is no
-reason whatever why the palace should not include an academy of music,
-an academy of arts, and an academy of acting; in a few months after its
-establishment it should have its own choir, its own orchestra, its own
-concerts, its own opera, with a company formed of its own _alumni_.
-And in a year or two it should have its own exhibition of paintings,
-drawings, and sculpture. As regards the simpler amusements, there must
-be rooms where the men can smoke, and others where the girls and women
-can work, read, and talk; there must be a debating society for questions,
-social and political, but especially the former.
-
-As for the teaching of the classes, we must look for voluntary work
-rather than to a great endowment. The history of the college in Great
-Ormand Street shows how much may be done by unpaid labor, and I do not
-think it too much to expect that the palace of the people may be started
-by unpaid teachers in every branch of science and art; moreover, as
-regards science, history and language, the University Extension Society
-will probably find the staff. There must be, however, volunteers, women
-as well as men, to teach singing, music, sewing, speaking, drawing,
-painting, carving, modeling, and many other things. This kind of help
-should only be wanted at the outset, because before long, all the art
-departments ought to be conducted by ex-students who have become in
-their turn teachers; they should be paid, but not on the West-end scale,
-from fees—so that the schools may support themselves. Let us not _give_
-more than is necessary; for every class and every course there should be
-some kind of fee, though a liberal system of small scholarships should
-encourage the students, and there should be the power of remitting
-fees in certain cases. As for the difficulty of starting the classes,
-I think that the assistance of board schoolmasters, foremen of works,
-Sunday-schools, the political clubs and debating societies should be
-invited; and that beside small scholarships, substantial prizes of
-musical and mathematical instruments, books, artists’ materials, and so
-forth, should be offered, with the glory of public exhibition and public
-performances. After the first year there should be nothing exhibited in
-the palace except work done in the classes, and no performances of music
-or of plays should be given but by the students themselves.
-
-There has been going on in Philadelphia for the last two years an
-experiment, conducted by Mr. Charles Leland, whose sagacious and
-active mind is as pleased to be engaged upon things practical as upon
-the construction of humorous poems. He has founded, and now conducts
-personally, an academy for the teaching of the minor arts; he gets shop
-girls, work girls, factory girls, boys and young men of all classes
-together, and he teaches them how to make things, pretty things, artistic
-things. “Nothing,” he writes to me, “can describe the joy which fills a
-poor girl’s mind when she finds that she, too, possesses and can exercise
-a real accomplishment.” He takes them as ignorant, perhaps—but I have no
-means of comparing—as the London factory girl, the girl of freedom, the
-girl with the fringe—and he shows them how to do crewel work, fret work,
-brass work; how to carve in wood; how to design; how to draw—he maintains
-that it is possible to teach nearly every one to draw; how to make and
-ornament leather work, boxes, rolls, and all kinds of pretty things in
-leather. What has been done in Philadelphia amounts, in fact, to this:
-That one man who loves his brother man is bringing purpose, brightness
-and hope into thousands of lives previously made dismal by hard and
-monotonous work; he has put new and higher thoughts into their heads; he
-has introduced the discipline of methodical training; he has awakened in
-them the sense of beauty. Such a man is nothing less than a benefactor to
-humanity. Let us follow his example in the palace of the people.
-
-I must go on, though there is so much to be said. I see before us, in the
-immediate future, a vast university, whose home is in Mile End Road; but
-it has affiliated colleges in all the suburbs, so that even poor, dismal,
-uncared-for Hoxton shall no longer be neglected; the graduates of this
-university are the men and women whose lives, now unlovely and dismal,
-shall be made beautiful for them by their studies, and their heavy eyes
-uplifted to meet the sunlight; the subjects of examination shall be,
-first, the arts of every kind; so that unless a man have neither eyes to
-see nor hand to work with, he may here find something or other which he
-may learn to do; and next, the games, sports, and amusements with which
-we cheat the weariness of leisure and court the joy of exercising brain
-and wit and strength. From the crowded classrooms I hear already the
-busy hum of those who learn and those who teach. Outside, in the street,
-are those—a vast multitude, to be sure—who are too lazy and too sluggish
-of brain to learn anything; but these, too, will flock into the palace
-presently to sit, talk, and argue in the smoking rooms; to read in the
-library; to see the students’ pictures upon the walls; to listen to the
-students’ orchestra, discoursing such music as they have never dreamed of
-before; to look on while Her Majesty’s Servants of the People’s Palace
-perform a play, and to hear the bright-eyed girls sing madrigals.—_The
-Contemporary Review._
-
-
-
-
-THE DEAD-LETTER OFFICE.
-
-By MRS. PATTIE L. COLLINS.
-
-
-The sarcasm that “Good Americans expect to go to Paris when they die,”
-has lost its force. They have a City Beautiful of their own which more
-than justifies the enthusiasm of those who dwell within her gates.
-There are no tall houses that shut out the blue sky and the sunshine,
-no narrow, filthy streets swarming with the children of the vicious and
-starving, but everywhere clean, broad highways, decent abodes, and the
-priceless blessing of a pure atmosphere. The smoke of factories does
-not drop its dusky mantle over the smiling river and the church spires
-glancing heavenward. Not even does the sound of a great traffic intrude
-into the peaceful repose of this ideal city. Art schools, musical
-conservatories, libraries, and various institutions of learning offer
-every inducement for liberal culture at rates so cheap that it may almost
-be said to be “without money and without price.” Into this community one
-can not come without feeling its broadening and elevating influence.
-Prejudices are obliterated, gentle toleration is followed by wide
-charity, sectionalism dies, and to thoroughly understand and appreciate
-these things makes a residence under the shadow of the dome a blessed
-realization. But I should go on endlessly if permitted to dwell upon this
-home of my heart; the historic Potomac touching the hem of her garments,
-and the wooded heights of Georgetown forming a Rembrandt-like background,
-are accessories of a picture to which no words, unless “touched with
-fire,” could do justice. I have often thought that not even Genoa the
-Superb, with its palaces and rich cathedrals rising high and yet higher
-above its gulf of sapphire, and finally encircled by its olive-crowned
-hills, was more beautiful.
-
-If, as has often been said, America has no distinctive style of
-architecture, at least the anomalous constructions of the Capital are
-harmonious, artistic, and imposing. The hoary cities of the Old World
-can only vie with her in her bold and lusty youth. The Smithsonian, that
-temple of knowledge, the Treasury, custodian of countless millions, those
-twin sisters, the Patent and Postoffice Departments, and the peerless
-Capitol itself are all monuments of national power in which we have a
-legitimate pride.
-
-Washington is scarcely less the shrine of the Republic than is Mecca
-to the followers of the prophet. Its fifty millions seem to ebb and
-flow, like the tide of the restless sea, through its grand avenues, its
-parks, its public buildings, ceaselessly, from January to December.
-Perhaps, among these casual sight-seers, no place is so much visited
-as the Postoffice Department, in a general way, and, if I may use the
-expression, the Dead-Letter Office, specifically, which is the very
-_sanctum sanctorum_ of written communications. It is characteristic of
-human nature to stand with mere vague wonderment before any question or
-occurrence that appears distant and impersonal. But anything that comes
-in the shape of an everyday occurrence, that touches intimately social
-and domestic relations arouses at once an acute interest. The Pagan
-element thus selfishly asserts itself in this ready subordination of the
-great problem of humanity to personal considerations. This may account
-for the eager delight and interest always displayed by the Dead-Letter
-Office pilgrims. And, on the other hand, it may be observed that those
-who, officially speaking, possess a proprietary interest in defunct
-epistles are akin to the dealers in other wares—they like to vaunt their
-merchandise!
-
-The gleaming pile of white marble, chaste, symmetrical, inviting, might
-be likened, after an exploration of its contents, to many another
-sepulcher—but I forbear a premature expression of opinion, and beg to
-invite you, my readers, through the front door, which, like the gates
-of mercy, stands ever wide open, and allow you to receive your own
-impressions.
-
-Dry statistics, I have idly observed, are not usually relished by the
-average knowledge-seeker, or shall I say even tolerated? But I shall
-presume that all of mine will patiently grapple with my arithmetical
-statements, which I promise shall not be complicated, and I also hope to
-escape the incredulity which painfully embarrassed a modest gentleman
-in this office, while making statements in regard to its workings to a
-party of visitors. He said to these unbelievers, as they stood among
-Uncle Sam’s mail bags, piled to the right and to the left of them,
-watching the busy clerks assort their contents, that from twelve to
-fifteen thousand letters were received upon every working day. This was
-received with a depressing silence. Proceeding further, he added that
-the mails were a means of transportation not only for letters, but for
-clothes, books, jewelry, and almost every article of merchandise. At
-this, a somewhat ironical smile was discernible. The gentleman was now
-somewhat disconcerted, but determining to die by his colors nobly, he
-seized upon an immense brogan lying upon an adjacent desk and exclaimed,
-desperately: “This is a specimen—could not go forward to its destination
-on account of being over weight—more than four pounds.” Here the auditors
-smiled broadly (it was conjectured afterward that one of the ladies must
-have been a Chicago belle and that, like Cinderella, she had lost her
-slipper). “However,” continued the narrator, somewhat abashed, but not
-wholly discomfited, “that is nothing compared to this,” showing an iron
-hitching post! At this the supposed western belle sweetly and gravely
-inquired, “Was the horse fastened to it, sir?”
-
-To be exact, the precise number of letters at the Dead-Letter Office
-during the fiscal year which ended July 1st, 1883, was 4,379,198.
-The official report furnishes the following information: “Of these
-3,346,357 were advertised and unclaimed at the offices to which they were
-addressed; 78,865 were returned from hotels, because the departed guests
-failed to leave a new address; 175,710 were insufficiently prepaid; 1,345
-contained articles forbidden to be transported by the mails; 280,137 were
-erroneously or illegibly addressed, while 11,979 bore no superscription
-whatever. Of the domestic letters opened, 15,301 contained money
-amounting to $32,647.23; 18,905 contained drafts, checks, money orders,
-etc., to the value of $1,381,994.47; 66,137 enclosed postage stamps;
-40,125, receipts, paid notes, and canceled obligations of all kinds, and
-35,160, photographs.”
-
-Compare this statement with the record of the office during Franklin’s
-administration; one small, time-stained volume contains the history
-of every valuable letter received, duly inscribed in the crabbed
-hieroglyphics of the period. The contrast between the forlorn,
-dilapidated, provincial little city of Alexandria, beloved of the Father
-of his Country, to the Washington of to-day is not more forcible. Now
-nearly one hundred employes are needed to perform the duties of the
-office. A vast apartment, surrounded by a broad gallery, and seven
-smaller rooms, beside the space allotted for storage in the basement, are
-the quarters at present occupied by this division of the public service.
-
-Everything is so systematized that an immediate answer can be returned to
-the thousands of inquiries received during a year in reference to letters
-or packages that have miscarried and been finally sent to the Dead-Letter
-Office.
-
-A large proportion of the money is restored to the senders, and the
-balance is deposited in the Treasury to the credit of the Postoffice
-Department. But despite every precaution, parcels of all descriptions
-accumulate so rapidly that it has been found necessary to dispose of them
-at public auction as often as once in two years.
-
-The Museum contains a curious collection of articles which have not
-been offered for sale. They are arranged upon shelves covered with
-dark crimson cloth, and protected by glass cases. It is certainly a
-heterogeneous assortment. A miniature mountain of minerals, many-colored
-and gleaming, open bolls of cotton, a box filled with small gold
-nuggets, and specimens of valuable woods are silent but eloquent
-witnesses of our immense natural resources and still undeveloped wealth.
-A bottle of imported cologne, carefully wrapped in herbs, probably just
-as it was captured from a would-be smuggler, lies here, forever free from
-both Custom House officer or dishonest speculator. A necklace wrought of
-fish scales, so delicate that it seems as if it must have been designed
-for a fairy princess, shows daintily against its dark background just
-beneath the oddest, quaintest baby monkey that ever was seen, carved
-from a peach stone! There are Indian pipes and tomahawks, a birch-bark
-canoe and moccasins, and lava from the Modoc beds, darkly suggestive of
-savage malice and treachery. A box heaped with the cocoons of the silk
-worm keeps company with a bottle full of agates from the northern shores
-of Lake Superior, reading cards for the blind, masses of wood fiber as
-fine, white and strong as linen floss, birds’ eggs, Easter offerings,
-and the rosaries of pious Sisters. The little folk who throng the Museum
-pause in wondering delight before the array of dolls, pet “Jumbos” of
-home manufacture, and even a greater wonder still, a bedstead, pillows,
-covering, babies and all, made of sugar and chocolate!
-
-Not even does this enumeration draw the line of limitation for the abuse
-of our generous Uncle Sam. It is fortunate for his people that he is
-patient under blows and as long-suffering as a camel, else an imperial
-ukase would have probably long ere this interdicted even social and
-business correspondence. In this he would have been quite justified,
-since he can neither eat the cakes, raisins and fruits, use the tooth
-brushes, nor take the medicine, with which his mails are burdened.
-
-A pistol, half-cocked, and each chamber filled with a cartridge, was not
-called for by the young lady to whom it was addressed, in a western city,
-and it now reposes harmlessly beside a lock of hair and the autograph of
-Charles Guiteau.
-
-From some of our distant Territories there are specimens of pottery which
-archæologists seem inclined to accept as evidences of a pre-historic
-civilization.
-
-Quite apart, ensconced in an aristocratic quarter, are various articles
-of jewelry, rings, watches, etc., and a costly crucifix of silver and
-carnelian, in a glass-covered case, which was found in the postoffice at
-Savannah, Ga., at the close of the war. But perhaps the saddest memento
-to be seen here is a funeral wreath, woven after the homely fashion
-of the German and French peasantry, of black and white beads and the
-sunny hair of childhood commingled, whilst an inscription in the center
-commemorates the death of “Ernest and Dorcas,” who have died within a few
-days of each other.
-
-However, it is only a step from the pathos of this mute appeal to one’s
-sympathies to the grotesque and ridiculous.
-
-Of course the Museum would not be complete if it did not contain sundry
-sets of false teeth. Well, one day a gentleman and his wife stood before
-these in rapt contemplation. She winked, and stepped upon his toes, and
-nudged him sharply—and all in a quiet and conjugal manner—but to no
-purpose; his confidential communications, made in a stage whisper, could
-not be cut short. “That _is_ my set of teeth that I lost; I would know
-them anywhere, same as I would know you, or my hat. I don’t want ’em now,
-because I’ve got some more, and I don’t know how they got here, but I
-would swear to my teeth.”
-
-Chief among these curiosities may be mentioned the snakes. Now, these
-snakes constitute a regular “big bonanza.” Letters, garments, live bees,
-embroideries and etchings lose their interest in the presence of the
-bottled serpents. A Brewers’ Convention was once held in this city,
-and during its progress a Teutonic delegation gazed in open-mouthed
-astonishment at their snakeships upon learning that they had arrived at
-the Dead-Letter Office alive; and small wonder, for they are thirteen
-in number, and range from the inoffensive looking junior members of the
-family to ancient and loathsome monsters.
-
-“Vat you say, dey come here ’live? how den you kill dem?”
-
-“Why, they were carried to the Medical Museum and chloroformed, then
-dropped into alcohol, which killed them, just as readily as it does men.”
-
-The brewers turned from the snakes to the _raconteur_, and the least
-taciturn thus commented:
-
-“Mine friend, dis is von temperance speech. You didn’t look stout; come
-down to our place and ve vill give you more beer den you can drink.”
-
-Before leaving the Museum I must not neglect to mention the rare coins.
-They represent the currency of almost every nationality, and many of
-them are as valuable as they are curious. They have come from Sumatra,
-Persia, China, and all over the civilized world. But the most remarkable,
-and therefore the most precious of the entire collection is a Roman coin
-bearing an inscription which declares it to have been in existence nearly
-four hundred years before the Christian Era.
-
-From the Foreign Branch of this office during the last year, 400,898
-dead letters were returned unopened to their respective countries of
-origin. This special work is presided over by a lady who is a remarkable
-linguist, and the possessor of many other scholarly accomplishments which
-peculiarly fit her for the position. Her skill in translating foreign
-addresses, deciphering illegible superscriptions and supplying their
-deficiencies is truly phenomenal.
-
-Scarcely less interesting is the work of handling misdirected domestic
-letters, also for the purpose of sending them forward unopened to their
-proper destination. Of the 100,000 thus sent out last year, more than
-ninety per cent. were delivered. These letters, it must be understood,
-are _live_ letters, sent here directly from the mailing office, on
-account of this deficiency or illegibility. An accurate and comprehensive
-knowledge of geography and other general information are requisite for
-the duties of this desk, as well as a sufficient knowledge of modern
-languages to interpret the combinations of bad Italian, French and German
-with worse English. For instance, an undomesticated Gaul will address a
-letter to “Ste Traile,” or “St. Treasure,” Ill., instead of Centralia;
-a Scandinavian writes Phœnix, “Sjfonix,” and a German with perfect
-independence of American dictionaries spells Eagle Lake “Igel Lacht.”
-Then again, Senatobia figures as “St. Toby;” Kankakee, as “Quinkequet
-City,” and Bridgetown, N. J., as “Bruchstein, Geargei.” This epistolary
-“Comedy of Errors” certainly leads one through perplexing labyrinths; as
-when a letter intended for Mr. George D. Townsend, of Kilby St., Boston,
-is addressed to Rilby St., Washington, D. C., or one intended for Hans
-Jenssen, in far away Norway, stops short in direction at Novgerod or
-Stavenger. If, as is frequently the case, the address consists merely of
-a hotel, college, asylum, reform school, factory, or newspaper office,
-street and number, without city or state, the clue is generally followed
-successfully. Whatever may be involved in this work, whether cold
-reasoning, analytical study, or felicitous intuition, it is accomplished
-with satisfactory results, therefore it matters little to what it is
-attributed.
-
-There are a few things (but not many) over which these “experts” become
-slightly discouraged, as for instance an address like this:
-
-“Please forward to the physician who was looking for a housekeeper in St.
-Louis, last week; is a widower with two children; don’t know his name.”
-
-Other specimens of wit and indefiniteness are not wanting, as in the
-following:
-
- “Bummer’s letter, shove it ahead;
- Dead broke, and nary a red.
- Postmaster, put this letter through,
- And when I get paid I’ll pay you.”
-
-Another:
-
- “To George W. Knowles this letter is sent,
- To the town of Brighton, where the other one went;
- No matter who wrote it, a friend or a foe,
- To the State of New York, I hope it will go.”
-
-A sordid young man writes from Albia, Iowa, to Sydney, Australia, upon
-a postal card addressed, “To any good-looking girl, who is worth, say
-£10,000, rank immaterial.” Upon the reverse side are set forth the
-particulars of his intentions after this wise:
-
- “DEAR MISS:—Well, I have found you at last, thanks to the good
- postmaster, whose super excellent judgment, I am happy to assure
- you, is in perfect accord with my own. Now then, the object of
- dropping you this postal is to open a correspondence with you.
- Intentions, matrimonial. Satisfaction guaranteed. Write at once,
- enclosing stamp for photo.
-
- “Yours, presumably,
-
- “JOHN LOOPER.”
-
-Sometime since several letters were received among the “misdirected,”
-addressed to Zachary, Marshall Co., Ala. As no trace of such office
-could be found, a circular of inquiry was sent to the postmaster at
-Dodsonville, the county seat of Marshall, requesting him, if there was
-such village, hamlet or settlement in his county, to ascertain its
-location and inform the Department. His response was both prompt and
-lucid, as a literal transcription will readily show:
-
- “Sirs i would say in answer to this letter that the settlement
- of Zachary is about five miles a little w of S in the Tennassee
- River valley Between Dodsonville and Henreyville the people of
- that Settlement is furnished with or get ther mail at Dodsonville
- and Swaringin Zachary has not been known as an office since the
- war it would furnish more people with mail to move Dry cove back
- 3 miles to where it was first established when thos Mitchell was
- P M and discontinued the rout from Dodsonville to Cottenville and
- run it down the valley to Henreyville and reastablish Zachary but
- you can use your own pleasure about that
-
- “yours truly
-
- “J D Gross P M”
-
-I have never ascertained whether the Department adopted Mr. Gross’s
-suggestions. Gratuitous and intelligent information like this was
-certainly entitled to respectful, if not favorable, consideration.
-
-In the same category with this brilliant ornament of the postal service
-might be placed the Londoner who addressed the Postmaster General for
-information concerning his brother “Charles Egar Quinton, who had sailed
-for America about nine years previously, with the intention of keeping a
-public house, or an hotel, and had never been heard of since.” Even the
-“experts” hung their heads in confusion as they pondered the whereabouts
-of Mr. Quinton, confessing themselves vanquished, unless, indeed, the
-Department would grant them six months’ leave, “a roving commission” and
-expenses paid, in which case they would pledge themselves to return the
-long-lost Charles, dead or alive, to his sorrowing relatives.
-
-To these children of the government any ordinary work, such as
-calculating an eclipse, taking an astronomical observation, tunneling the
-Channel, or drawing up a Lasker resolution, would have been an easy and
-delightful task, and promptly executed, but this search for an unknown
-quantity still hidden among or long since eliminated from fifty millions
-was a task too herculean for contemplation.
-
- * * * * *
-
-I do not, for my own part, like the notion of keeping books cribbed and
-coffined under glass. They are like friends; if they can not be used
-freely, they are worth little. The dust will come, and finger-marks will
-come. Well, let them—if only the finger-mark has given a thought-mark to
-match it. I can not say but a little disarray of home-books is a good
-sign of familiarity, and that sort of acquaintance which makes them
-worshipful friends. Nay, I go farther than this, and would not give
-a shuttle cock for a home-book which I might not annotate. No matter
-what wealth is there already, our own little half-pence may be more
-relished by home eyes, than the pile of gold which retains its unbroken
-formality.—_From “Bound Together,” by Ik Marvel._
-
-
-
-
-AGASSIZ.
-
-LEAVES FROM OUR SCRAP BOOK.
-
-By Prof. J. TINGLEY, Ph.D.
-
-
-There are stories that should never be allowed to grow old. There are
-lives and characters whose memory should be forever kept green—whose
-light and fervor should glow in the minds of men as steadily as the
-unfading stars. While the Father of us all has given us but one perfect
-model, but one example of manhood without blemish, yet, all through
-the world’s history, remarkable types of men have been developed, so
-distinct, so worthy, so far removed from the average plane of humanity
-as to command the attention, the respect, and even the reverence of the
-thoughtful of all time. They are constant reminders of the heights of
-power and dignity to which the immortal soul may aspire. Familiarity
-with the events of their lives—with the loftiness of their purposes—with
-the warmth and passion of their thoughts—with the achievements of their
-energy and wisdom—lifts us all up, inspires us with eager desire to be
-like them in our devotion to truth and noble effort. No one will deny to
-Louis Agassiz a prominent place among these immortals—these “names that
-were not born to die.” So recently a living force among us, the echoes of
-eulogy still linger with us. With many a reader of THE CHAUTAUQUAN his
-name is doubtless a household word. Not for these, but for the younger
-class of readers, we gather from our scrap book something about the
-eminent naturalist, which they may not have met with elsewhere—something
-perhaps that may awaken the desire to know more of him. It is to be
-regretted that we have not yet a complete biography of so remarkable a
-man. At the time of his death it was supposed that the most competent
-hand for such a work would give it to the world at an early day—but it
-has not yet appeared.
-
-Short biographical sketches containing the leading events of his life,
-and giving an account of the results of his labor and studies may be
-found in the principal cyclopædias, and in many of the periodicals
-issued soon after his death. But there are volumes of incident and
-characteristic utterances which are scattered here and there—familiar
-only to such friends and admirers as cherish every line and word that has
-been written concerning him. Some of these we find in our scrap book.
-
-
-AGASSIZ, THE TEACHER.
-
-A prominent trait in the character of Agassiz was his dislike of
-ostentation. This is eminently illustrated in his virtual rejection of
-all titles. He possessed all the honors that Universities and learned
-societies could bestow, but made no use of them. On the title page of
-his great works we find only “Louis Agassiz.” There was, however, one
-title in which he did take pride—the only one he ever assumed. In his
-last will he described himself as “Louis Agassiz, teacher.” An intimate
-personal friend alluding to this, says that “he gloried in the title
-of schoolmaster, preferring it to that of professor.” He deemed the
-profession of teacher “the noblest of all professions, but included in
-that category all good and great minds engaged in disseminating knowledge
-or in increasing it.”
-
-The desire to know something of his methods and ideas of teaching,
-is often expressed. His methods were simple, but radically different
-from prevailing methods. He despised recitations by rote from
-text-books—allowed the use of books only for reference, and urged
-the selection of such as were authoritative and the work of original
-investigators. In teaching Natural History his leading purpose was to
-stimulate and secure independent observation. A fine illustration of this
-was given anonymously by one of his pupils, who subsequently became a
-successful entomologist, in _Every Saturday_, in 1874, which we venture
-to quote entire, as affording perhaps the best conception of his method:
-
-“It was more than fifteen years ago that I entered the laboratory of
-Professor Agassiz and told him I had enrolled my name in the scientific
-school as a student of natural history. He asked me a few questions
-about my object in coming, my antecedents generally, the mode in which
-I afterward proposed to use the knowledge I might acquire, and finally,
-whether I wished to study any special branch. To the latter I replied
-that while I wished to be well grounded in all departments of zoölogy, I
-purposed to devote myself specially to insects.
-
-“‘When do you wish to begin?’ he asked.
-
-“‘Now,’ I replied.
-
-“This seemed to please him, and with an energetic ‘Very well,’ he reached
-from a shelf a huge jar of specimens in yellow alcohol. ‘Take this fish,’
-said he, ‘and look at it; we call it a Hæmulon; by and by I will ask what
-you have seen.’
-
-“With that he left me, but in a moment he returned with explicit
-instructions as to the care of the object intrusted to me. ‘No man is
-fit to be a naturalist,’ said he, ‘who does not know how to take care of
-specimens.’
-
-“I was to keep the fish before me in a tin tray, and occasionally moisten
-the surface with alcohol from the jar, always taking care to replace
-the stopper tightly. Those were not the days of ground glass stoppers
-and elegantly shaped exhibition jars; all the old students will recall
-the huge, neckless glass bottles with their leaky, wax-besmeared corks,
-half eaten by insects and begrimed with cellar dust. Entomology was a
-cleaner science than ichthyology, but the example of the Professor, who
-had unhesitatingly plunged to the bottom of the jar to produce the fish,
-was infectious, and though this alcohol had ‘a very ancient and fish-like
-smell,’ I really dared not show any aversion within these sacred
-precincts, for gazing at a fish did not commend itself to an ardent
-entomologist. My friends at home, too, were annoyed when they discovered
-that no amount of eau de cologne would drown the perfume which haunted
-me like a shadow. In ten minutes I had seen all that could be seen in
-that fish, and started in search of the Professor, who had, however, left
-the museum; and when I returned, after lingering over some of the odd
-animals stored in the upper department, my specimen was dry all over.
-I dashed the fluid over the fish as if to resuscitate the beast from a
-fainting fit, and looked with anxiety for a return of the normal sloppy
-appearance. This little excitement over, nothing was to be done but
-return to a steadfast gaze at my mute companion. Half an hour passed—an
-hour—another hour; the fish began to look loathsome. I turned it over
-and around; looked it in the face—ghastly; from behind, beneath, above,
-sideways, at three-quarters view—just as ghastly. I was in despair; at
-an early hour I concluded that lunch was necessary; so, with infinite
-relief, the fish was carefully replaced in the jar, and for an hour I was
-free.
-
-“On my return, I learned that Professor Agassiz had been at the museum,
-but had gone and would not return for several hours. My fellow-students
-were too busy to be disturbed by continued conversation. Slowly I drew
-forth that hideous fish, and with a feeling of desperation again looked
-at it. I might not use a magnifying glass; instruments of all kinds were
-interdicted. My two hands, my two eyes, and the fish; it seemed a most
-limited field. I pushed my finger down its throat to feel how sharp the
-teeth were. I began to count the scales in the different rows until I
-was convinced that that was nonsense. At last a happy thought struck
-me—I would draw the fish—and now with surprise I began to discover new
-features in the creature. Just then the Professor returned. ‘That is
-right,’ said he; ‘a pencil is one of the best of eyes. I am glad to
-notice, too, that you keep your specimen wet and your bottle corked.’
-
-“With these encouraging words, he added: ‘Well, what is it like?’
-
-“He listened attentively to my brief rehearsal of the structure of parts
-whose names were still unknown to me; the fringed gill-arches and
-movable operculum; the pores of the head, fleshy lips, and lidless eyes;
-the lateral line, the spinous fins, and forked tail; the compressed and
-arched body. When I had finished he waited as if expecting more, and
-then, with an air of disappointment:
-
-“‘You have not looked very carefully. Why,’ he continued more earnestly,
-‘You haven’t even seen one of the most conspicuous features of the
-animal, which is as plainly before your eyes as the fish itself; look
-again, look again!’ and he left me to my misery.
-
-“I was piqued; I was mortified. Still more of that wretched fish. But
-now I set myself to work with a will, and discovered one new thing after
-another, until I saw how just the Professor’s criticism had been. The
-afternoon passed quickly, and when, towards its close, the Professor
-inquired:
-
-“‘Do you see it yet?’
-
-“‘No,’ I replied, ‘I am certain I do not—but I see how little I saw
-before.’
-
-“‘That is next best,’ said he earnestly, ‘but I won’t hear you now; put
-away your fish and go home; perhaps you will be ready with a better
-answer in the morning. I will examine you before you look at the fish.’
-
-“This was disconcerting; not only must I think of my fish all night,
-studying, without the object before me, what this unknown but most
-visible feature might be; but also, without reviewing my new discoveries,
-I must give an exact account of them the next day. I had a bad memory;
-so I walked home by Charles River in a distracted state, with my two
-perplexities.
-
-“The cordial greeting from the Professor the next morning was reassuring;
-here was a man who seemed to be quite as anxious as I, that I should see
-for myself what he saw—‘Do you perhaps mean,’ I asked, ‘that the fish has
-symmetrical sides with paired organs?’
-
-“His thoroughly pleased ‘Of course, of course!’ repaid the wakeful hours
-of the previous night. After he had discoursed most enthusiastically—as
-he always did—upon the importance of this point, I ventured to ask what I
-should do next. ‘Oh, look at your fish!’ he said, and left me again to my
-own devices.
-
-“In a little more than an hour he returned and heard my new catalogue.
-‘That is good, that is good!’ he repeated; ‘but that is not all; go on;’
-and so for three long days he placed that fish before my eyes, forbidding
-me to look at anything else, or to use any artificial aid. ‘Look, look,
-look,’ was his repeated injunction.
-
-“This was the best entomological lesson I ever had—a lesson whose
-influence has extended to the details of every subsequent study; a legacy
-the Professor has left to me, as he has left it to many others, of
-inestimable value, which we could not buy, with which we can not part.
-
-“A year afterward, some of us were amusing ourselves with chalking
-outlandish beasts upon the museum black-board. We drew prancing
-star-fishes; frogs in mortal combat; hydra-headed worms; stately
-craw-fishes, standing on their tails, bearing aloft umbrellas; and
-grotesque fishes with gaping mouths and staring eyes.
-
-“The Professor came in shortly after and was amused as any at our
-experiments. He looked at the fishes. ‘Hæmulons, every one of them,’ he
-said; ‘Mr. ⸺ drew them.’
-
-“True; and to this day, if I attempt a fish, I can draw nothing but
-Hæmulons. The fourth day a second fish of the same group was placed
-beside the first, and I was bidden to point out the resemblances and
-differences between the two; another and another followed, until the
-entire family lay before me, and a whole legion of jars covered the table
-and surrounding shelves; the odor had become a pleasant perfume; and
-even now, the sight of an old, six-inch, worm-eaten cork brings fragrant
-memories!
-
-“The whole group of Hæmulons was thus brought in review; and, whether
-engaged upon the dissection of the internal organs, the preparation and
-examination of the bony framework, or the description of the various
-parts, Agassiz’s training in the method of observing facts and their
-orderly arrangement, was ever accompanied by the urgent exhortation not
-to be content with them. ‘Facts are stupid things,’ he would say, ‘until
-brought into connection with some general law.’
-
-“At the end of eight months it was almost with reluctance that I left
-these friends and turned to insects; but what I had gained by this
-outside experience has been of greater value than years of later
-investigation in my favorite groups.”
-
-In Prof. Agassiz’s opening lecture to the Anderson School at Penikese
-some notable sayings occur, a few of which are quoted in further
-illustration of his ideas. “It is a great mistake to suppose that _any
-one_ can teach the elements of a science. This is indeed the most
-difficult part of instruction, and it requires the most mature teachers.”
-
-“Not by a superficial familiarity with many things, but _by a thorough
-knowledge of a few things_, does any one grow in mental strength and
-vigor. De Candolle told me that he could teach all he knew with a dozen
-plants. Unquestionably he could have done it better with so few than
-with many, certainly for beginners. If a teacher does not require many
-specimens, so they be well selected, neither should he seek for them far
-and wide. _Let the pupil find in his daily walks the illustrations and
-repeated evidence of what he has heard in the school room._ I think there
-should be a little museum in every school room, some dozen specimens of
-radiates, a few hundred shells, a hundred insects with some crustacea and
-worms, a few fishes, birds and mammalia, enough to characterize every
-class in the animal kingdom. Pupils should be encouraged to find their
-own specimens, and taught to handle them. This training is of greater
-value and wider application than it may seem. Delicacy of manipulation,
-such as the higher kinds of investigation demand requires the whole
-organization to be brought into harmony with the mental action. The whole
-nervous system must be in subordination to the intellectual purpose. Even
-the pulsation of the arteries must not disturb the steadiness of attitude
-and gaze of the investigator.”
-
-“The study of Nature is a mental struggle for the mastery of the external
-world. If we do not consider it in this light we shall hardly succeed in
-the highest aims of the naturalist. It is truly a struggle of man for an
-intellectual assimilation of the thought of God.”
-
-
-HIS UNSELFISHNESS.
-
-Another eminent trait in the character of Agassiz was his unselfish
-devotion to his life-work; the development and dissemination of
-scientific knowledge. Many anecdotes have been told in illustration of
-this trait. Every one has read of his reply to a proposition to direct
-his scientific efforts in a scheme for personal emolument: “_I can not
-afford to waste my time in making money._” A sentiment perfectly natural
-to him, but which struck every other mind as something so unique as to be
-reckoned sublime.
-
-When asked how he contrived to preserve his scientific independence
-while living in a community which was generally hostile to all opinion
-which clashed with its theological and political beliefs and passions,
-he replied: “Why the reason is plain—I never was a quarter of a dollar
-ahead in the world, and I never expect to be. When a man of science wants
-money for himself, he may be compelled to subordinate science to public
-opinion; when he wants money simply for the advancement of science, he
-gets it somehow, because it is known that not a cent sticks in his own
-pocket.”
-
-At one time when his museum was in need of money, and he had applied to
-the legislature of Massachusetts for an appropriation, two intelligent
-legislators, evidently farmers, who were considering the propriety of
-voting the sum required, were overheard: “I don’t know much,” said one,
-“about the value of this museum as a means of education, but of one thing
-I am certain, that if we give Agassiz the money he wants, _he_ will
-not make a dollar by it; that’s in his favor.” The appropriation was
-made—though probably no other man could have been similarly successful.
-
-
-HIS RELIGIOUS NATURE.
-
-Perhaps the most appreciative analysis of Agassiz’s work and character
-that has ever been written, appeared in _Harper’s Magazine_ for June,
-1879. It was written by E. P. Whipple, his intimate friend for over
-thirty years. In this most admirable article will be found a just
-estimate of Agassiz’s religious views. The author says: “No justice can
-be done to Agassiz which does not recognize the deep religiousness of his
-nature.” Agassiz is represented as using the following words: “I will
-frankly tell you that my experience in prolonged scientific investigation
-convinces me that a belief in God—a God who is behind and within the
-chaos of ungeneralized facts beyond the present vanishing points of human
-knowledge—adds a wonderful stimulus to the man who attempts to penetrate
-into the region of the unknown. For myself I may say that I now never
-make the preparations for penetrating into some small province of nature
-hitherto undiscovered without breathing a prayer to the Being who hides
-his secrets from me only to allure me graciously on to the unfolding of
-them. I sometimes hear preachers speak of the sad condition of men who
-live without God in the world, but a scientist who lives without God in
-the world seems to me worse off than ordinary men.”
-
-The same author says: “Of one thing I am sure, he had a deep conviction,
-as strong as that of Augustine, or Bernard, or Luther, or Edwards, or
-Wesley, or Channing, that there were means of communication between the
-Divine and the human mind.”
-
-
-HISTORY OF THE GLACIAL THEORY, AS TOLD BY AGASSIZ.
-
-As a geologist the name of Agassiz will always be associated with what
-is known in scientific parlance as “The Glacial Theory of Drift.” This
-was first advanced by him, and by him was it triumphantly sustained. The
-history of the growth and development of this important thought in his
-mind, is worthy of attention—both because of its intrinsic interest and
-importance and because it is an exhibition of the methods of research,
-scientific insight and powers of generalization characteristic of Agassiz.
-
-It is given here substantially as he gave it at the Anderson School at
-Penikese. This theory proposes to account for the huge boulders that are
-so profusely scattered over the surface of the continent north of the
-40th parallel of latitude—and for all the gravel beds that are found
-in the same localities, by assuming that during a comparatively recent
-geological period the continents were covered with ice many thousand
-feet in thickness, moving from the poles toward the equator—as glaciers
-move down the Alps and other mountain regions, and doing the same kind
-of work on a larger scale. This daring conception was received at first
-by scientific men almost with contempt and derision—but is now generally
-accepted.
-
-Glaciers are accumulations of ice, descending by gravity combined with
-other forces and conditions, down mountain slopes, along valleys, from
-snow-covered elevations. They are streams or rivers of ice varying in
-depth from a few hundred to thousands of feet. They are fed by the snows
-and frozen mist of regions above the limits of perpetual snow. They
-stretch far below the limit of perpetual snow, because their masses are
-too thick to be melted by the heat of the summer.
-
-Some of them reach down to the very orchards and the grain fields and
-the blooming gardens of the valley; remaining all summer long within a
-few hundred feet of the homes and cultivated fields of the inhabitants.
-They bear upon their bosom vast streams of stones and rocks that have
-fallen from the mountain slopes or have been torn from their places by
-the movement of the glaciers. These they carry to their termination
-and deposit in the valleys. These accumulations of stones, often many
-square miles in extent and hundreds of feet in thickness, are called
-moraines. Glaciers are not confined to mountain lands. Their domain is
-rather in the polar regions, where vast masses of ice accumulate and move
-forward by the same laws and in obedience to the same forces that govern
-the formation and movement of mountain glaciers. They produce similar
-effects, only upon a far grander scale.
-
-The summer of 1836 Agassiz passed at the foot of the Alps with his old
-friend Charpentier, who was familiar with the geology of Switzerland
-and had devoted a great deal of his time to the study of the glaciers.
-Charpentier had been told by the shepherds of the Alps that the glaciers
-had brought down the rocks that were scattered through the valleys. The
-scientists had previously believed them to have been transported by
-water. Venetz, a Swiss civil engineer, told him that the peasants were
-right, and the scientists wrong. “Upon this hint we acted,” said Agassiz,
-“and together we went to ascertain the facts.” Many of the leading
-geologists of the time believed with Werner, of Freiburg, Saxony, that
-the loose unstratified material upon the surface of the earth should be
-referred to the Noachian deluge as a sufficient explanation. From this
-belief these phenomena were called Diluvium, or drift. Others, with
-Hutton and Playfair, of Edinburgh, maintained that all rocks were derived
-in one way or another by the agency of heat. That great master, Leopold
-von Buch, soon showed that both were right, in part. “Von Buch,” said
-Agassiz, “was a wonderful man—one of the great original investigators—a
-man of indomitable perseverance. He traveled all over Europe on foot,
-to study its geology. I have known him to go from Berlin to Stockholm
-for the sake of comparing a single fossil with one there—or to start to
-St. Petersburg with only an extra pair of socks in his pocket.” Yet he
-was a German nobleman, and was welcome at the Emperor’s court—though
-an exceedingly modest and humble man. Geology owes its present form to
-Leopold von Buch, and to no one else. He was a pupil of Werner, but had
-discarded Werner’s errors. In his travels in Scandinavia he laid the
-foundation of geology as now known and understood. He had noticed the
-loose boulders all over the sides of the mountains, and in the valleys
-of Switzerland, to the Jura. He explained them by assuming that formerly
-there were large lakes high up in the Alps, that had broken their
-barriers and rushed down the mountains, carrying every thing with them
-and sweeping the materials over an extensive territory. This opinion was
-received as final, and the matter rested. Agassiz upon investigation,
-began to doubt, and soon satisfied himself that the boulders were in
-positions in which they could not have been placed by water. Charpentier
-and Venetz, from the hint of the Alpine shepherds, had concluded that all
-the phenomena were produced by the Alpine glaciers. Agassiz agreed with
-them only so far as the range of Switzerland was concerned. But there
-were boulders outside of Switzerland, beyond its valleys and mountains,
-that were of such materials as were not found in the Alps. Germany was
-covered with them clear up to the shores of the Baltic. Agassiz had
-observed them in France, and was told that boulders of the same kind
-were abundant in Scandinavia. “Then,” said Agassiz, “_it dawned upon me
-that there might once have been glaciers in countries where they are not
-now found, and they might have extended much farther than any we know of
-now_.”
-
-Surely this was a moment of inspiration—the first glimpse of the light
-which has since become clear and perfect day. So Agassiz conceived the
-idea of studying the glaciers, and went to work. In prosecuting his
-investigations he passed nine successive summer vacations upon the
-surface of the glaciers of the Alps, devoting his entire time to this one
-object. During one season he slept seventy-one consecutive nights upon
-the ice, under the stars. He said, “I studied glaciers to see how they
-were made; to see how they worked; what they did, and what effects they
-produced upon the countries where found. I was soon familiar with the
-condition of the surfaces under a glacier. I saw that they are smoothed,
-polished, grooved, scratched—as though a gigantic file had moved across
-them. I compared their effects with those produced by the action of
-water on rocks, in rivers, on the sea shore, in all sorts of places and
-conditions, and I found that wherever water was at work the surface of
-rocks was acted upon in a manner entirely different from that of ice. Ice
-acts like a plane; water wears into ruts. Pebbles by the motion of water
-are smoothed and rounded, but never polished. The effects are produced by
-pounding and not by rubbing. But when ice moves over a solid surface the
-moving mass between would be rolled, rubbed and polished. Scratches will
-be made, rectilinear in direction, if the mass moves continuously in one
-direction. The pebbles are found not only polished, but also themselves
-scratched. In this way I learned to discriminate between loose pebbles
-formed by water and those formed by ice. I next noticed that erratic
-boulders were found to be always associated with scratched materials,
-and lay over the surface, scratched. The materials were not stratified,
-as were river deposits, but piled pell mell together. Satisfied with the
-correctness of my observations in southern Europe, I asked myself whether
-any other country, England, for example, in which there was no suspicion
-of glaciers ever having existed, would exhibit the same phenomena. In
-1840 I went to England with this idea in view.
-
-“It was said, ‘Agassiz has gone to England on a glacier hunt,’ and I
-was laughed at all over Europe. There were at that time many harsh
-discussions going on between scientific men and others, and much
-heart-burning among the scientists themselves. But all geologists were
-satisfied, and agreed that the drift materials were all produced by the
-agency of water. Leopold von Buch, the veteran, was the leader in this
-opinion. So by my assertion that the drift had never been touched by
-water, I had offended the great master, and I was only a boy, and had
-only my convictions. _But I knew from my own investigations that I was
-right_, and I fought my way, not by argument or prevailing influence, but
-by evidence. In 1838, two years before my trip to England, I requested
-Dr. Buckland, of Oxford, to come over and see me in Switzerland, and
-allow me to show him the evidence of my convictions. Buckland was
-Professor of Geology in Oxford University, author of the Bridgewater
-treatise on geology, and afterward Dean of Westminster. He accepted my
-invitation and became satisfied that the holders of the old opinions had
-not seen all the facts—that the water theory, in short, was erroneous.
-I found in him the first friend ready to investigate and explore. So
-when I went to England in 1840 I readily induced him to accompany me in
-my journey. In company with him I traveled over most of that country
-and Scotland. The morning on which we approached the castle of the Duke
-of Argyle is one I never shall forget, for as we looked from the top
-of the coach upon the valley in which the castle lay, reminding me so
-strongly of some of the familiar landscapes of Switzerland, I said to Dr.
-Buckland: ‘Here we shall find our first indications of glaciers;’ _and
-we actually had to ride over glacial moraines_ to reach the castle. We
-traveled over nearly the whole of Great Britain, and I made a geological
-map of the island to which, I think, not much has since been added.
-Everywhere I found abundant evidence of glaciers, everywhere scratched
-surfaces, covered with scratched boulders. Moraines piled up, and
-elevations swept. _Then I did not hesitate to go beyond my facts, and
-generalize_; and my generalization was this: As all mountain centers,
-all high lands, constitute centers around which erratic boulders are
-scattered, and as in that country, these mountain centers are now all
-below the snow-line—that is, the line of perpetual snow—there must have
-been a colder climate, _and glaciers must have existed upon mountains now
-below the line of perpetual snow_. But this is true not only of England,
-but also of other countries. All boulders come from their own mountain
-centers, and similar phenomena are found in many parts of Europe, and on
-the other continents. There are also still more telling facts. There are
-spaces, now impassable, intervening between the drift boulders and their
-origin, that must have been bridged over by ice. There are boulders in
-Great Britain that must have come from Scandinavia across the North Sea.
-Those which are spread over northern Germany also came from Scandinavia,
-as is proven by the fossils they contain, and must therefore have crossed
-the Baltic Sea. These and similar facts lead to a broader generalization.
-_There was a time when the whole globe was very much colder than now,
-when a great geological winter spread over the whole earth._ This period
-I called the glacial period. It was anterior to our present state of
-things, but subsequent to a period much warmer than now.” That the
-age immediately preceding, which geology calls the Tertiary, was much
-warmer, is proven by the fact that the remains of tropical animals are
-scattered all over the American continent. Elephants, rhinoceroses,
-tigers, camels, and many other tropical animals roamed over the northern
-parts of the continent. They are all gone, and over their remains, and
-covering the continent everywhere from Baffin’s Bay to Cape Horn, are the
-erratic boulders and the drift. An examination of the drift phenomena of
-North America led Agassiz to the conclusion that during this succeeding
-geological winter our continent was covered by a sheet of ice many
-thousands of feet—not less than a mile—in thickness.
-
-Such is a brief account of the history of the inception and growth of
-this now well known theory. From 1837 to 1840 no geologist was bold
-enough to admit its truth; now no one is bold enough to deny it, except
-in unimportant particulars. It has stood the test of years of violent
-controversy. It stands now among the established facts of science. “In
-some recent geological writings,” says Dr. Thomas Hill, “it is assumed
-as a doctrine accepted from time immemorial, yet we all know that
-forty-five years ago Agassiz was the only man who had ever peered into
-the silent desert of that new thought.” Sir Roderick Murchison, the great
-English geologist, once said of the glacial theory: “I have been for
-twenty years opposing Agassiz’s views, and now I find that I have been
-for twenty years opposing the truth.” The establishment of this theory
-has a significance not thought of originally by its propounder. In one
-of his lectures on Brazil he thus states the case: “If this doctrine
-be true, you see at once how this intense cold must have modified the
-surface of the globe, to the extent of excluding life from its surface—of
-interrupting the normal course of the vital phenomena, and preparing the
-surface of the earth for the new creation which now exists upon it. I
-attach great importance in a philosophical point of view to the study
-of this ice period; because, if demonstrated that such was once the
-condition of our earth, it will follow that the doctrine of transmutation
-of species, and of the descent of animals that live now, from those of
-past days, is cut at the root by this winter, which put an end to all
-living beings on the surface of the globe.”
-
- * * * * *
-
-Archbishop Usher, when crossing the Channel from Ireland to England,
-was wrecked on some part of the coast of Wales. After having reached
-the shore, he made the best of his way to the house of a clergyman, who
-resided not far from the spot on which he was cast. Without communicating
-his exalted station, the archbishop introduced himself as a brother
-clergyman in distress, and stated the particulars of his misfortune. The
-Cambrian divine, suspecting his unknown visitor to be an impostor, gave
-him no very courteous reception, and said: “I dare say, you can’t tell
-me how many commandments there are?” “There are eleven,” replied the
-archbishop, very meekly. “Repeat the eleventh,” rejoined the other, “and
-I will relieve your distress.” “Then _you_ will put the commandment in
-practice,” answered the primate: “A new commandment I give unto you, that
-you love one another.”
-
-
-
-
-TRAINED NURSES.
-
-By LULIE W. WINCHESTER.
-
-
-It is my purpose in this paper to explain the duties of a nurse, and
-above all to endeavor to influence those of my sisters who are asking
-the old question, “What can I do?” to enter this field of usefulness,
-and make honored and helpful places for themselves in the ranks of this
-profession. It seems to me that the mission of the physician and nurse
-is more closely allied than any other, to that of our Savior, who went
-about doing good, who came not to be ministered unto but to minister,
-who walked throughout Judea, Samaria and Galilee, laying his hand on the
-poor, sick and oppressed, with its life and health-giving touch.
-
-The Bellevue Hospital Training School in New York City is the pioneer,
-being the first one established in the United States. It was commenced
-as an experiment in 1873 with six nurses, and has succeeded so well as
-to now accommodate sixty, who have the charge of fourteen wards. It is
-the largest, and in many respects the best, offering a greater variety of
-disease, and therefore giving the nurses more knowledge and experience in
-the treatment of the various ills to which humanity is subjected. Soon
-after the establishment of this school a similar one was started in St.
-Catharines, Canada, by the late well-known Dr. Mack. He sent to England
-for three trained nurses who took charge of the school at the General and
-Marine Hospital. It was very small at first, but now accommodates fifteen
-or twenty nurses. For a long time it was the only school in Canada, but
-within the last few years one has been established in Toronto. The course
-of training at the St. Catharines school is somewhat longer than in
-others, viz.: Three months on probation, and a term of three years, with
-a monthly salary and house and street uniform provided.
-
-The school at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston is widely
-known for its excellence, as also the Buffalo General Hospital School. In
-San Francisco there is but one small school at the Women’s and Children’s
-Hospital on Thirteenth Street. Indeed, it is the only one on the coast,
-and finds employment but for six or eight nurses. It seems strange that
-such an enterprising city as San Francisco should not take more decided
-steps toward the establishment of a larger school, with more variety in
-nursing. But it is a work that will grow and spread as the necessity for
-skillful nursing becomes more apparent. In all these schools the term is
-about the same, a month on probation, and a two years’ course, with a
-monthly salary and house uniform, which is usually a seersucker dress,
-long full white apron, and dainty white muslin or linen cap.
-
-The training consists of lectures by the medical staff and
-superintendent, on anatomy, physiology, hygiene, and the general
-principles of nursing, the observation and recording of symptoms, the
-diet of the sick, and the best methods of managing helpless patients.
-Instruction is given in the wards on the dressing of wounds, the
-application of blisters, fomentations, poultices, cups and leeches;
-the use of catheters and administration of enemas, methods of applying
-friction, bandaging, making beds, changing and drawing sheets, moving
-patients and preventing bed-sores, and the application of trusses and
-uterine appliances.
-
-At the end of the term examinations are held, and the successful ones
-receive their diplomas. Some choose to follow the vocation of private
-nurses, others seek a position as head nurse in some institution, while
-others are by their superior intelligence and education to become in
-their turn superintendents of other training schools.
-
-The qualifications necessary for a young woman to procure entrance
-on probation are a sound constitution, no defects in either hearing
-or sight, a common school education, and a good moral character.
-Certificates of the above must be presented—that of health from a
-physician.
-
-Exceptions are sometimes made in the matter of sight and hearing, as
-for instance, one nurse in the institution I was connected with, was
-totally deaf in one ear; the other was perfectly well, however, and she
-was a very successful nurse. There were several who were obliged to wear
-glasses, but did not seem at all unfitted for their duties. But generally
-the rules are strict, as must needs be, in order to keep up the good name
-and reputation of a school.
-
-Other qualifications are also indispensable in order to become a good
-nurse, although they are not always specified in the demands. Gentleness
-in manner, voice, touch and footstep is important. What is more annoying
-than a sharp, impatient voice, heavy step and touch? The poor patient’s
-nerves are all set on edge by such an attendant. I remember one poor
-woman in my ward, wasted almost to a skeleton with consumption, who asked
-me once while bathing her, what another nurse’s occupation had been
-before entering the hospital. She said the nurse was kind-hearted enough,
-but oh! so loud and hard and heavy about everything. I replied that I
-believed she had worked on a farm in the old country. “I thought so,”
-said the patient, “it seems as if she were more used to handling animals
-than human beings; she bathes me like she was rubbing down a horse or
-scrubbing the kitchen table.” And that is true of many. There is nothing
-more soothing than a light, delicate, but firm touch in handling invalids.
-
-Another thing to be cultivated is an even temper. Remember that an
-invalid is hardly to be considered a responsible person, no more so
-than a child, so bear all his whims and caprices with cheerfulness
-and equanimity. A bright, cheerful, sunny nurse or doctor is often
-better than medicine. I do not mean constant joking and laughing, but a
-prevailing atmosphere of sunshine.
-
-They are blessed indeed who are born with a bright, hopeful nature. But
-it can be cultivated—I know from experience—by dwelling in constant
-communion with Him who is the light of the world.
-
-Another thing that Miss Nightingale lays great stress upon is the habit
-of observation. A nurse should be quick to notice all changes in the
-temperature, respiration and appetite of the patient, together with
-numerous other changes and variations which can not here be mentioned. A
-quick, observing nurse, is an invaluable aid to a physician. This faculty
-is natural in a great many persons, and it may be cultivated.
-
-In attending private cases the nurse must take great heed to her ways,
-not to be too forward or talkative, and above all to guard sacredly all
-family matters which may come under her observation.
-
-The motto of the ancient Spartans at their public dinners, “No word
-spoken here, goes out there” (the door), might well be adopted by her.
-Of all things, a gossiping nurse is most odious, and she soon loses her
-reputation.
-
-Here is the routine for one day at the hospital I was employed in: The
-nurses rise at six, dress, and put their rooms in order, and hurry down
-to breakfast, which is served at half-past six. At seven they are in
-their wards, to relieve the night nurses. The first thing is to serve
-breakfast; after that is cleared away comes the bathing of helpless
-patients, and making the beds; then the long ward is swept twice from
-top to bottom, and every thing picked up, dusted, and put straight.
-Wounds are then dressed and medicines given out, and all is ready for
-the doctor’s visit at ten. After that comes the milk or beef-tea lunch
-for those who require it, and general waiting on and attending to the
-various wants of the patients (which are always numerous, whether real
-or fancied). Dinner is served in the ward at half-past twelve, and half
-an hour later for the nurses. After dinner more medicines are given
-out, and the time is filled with the general attendance, for of course
-some patients need a great deal more care than others; fomentations
-and poultices must be applied, the bed of a restless patient re-made,
-a broken limb bathed and re-bandaged, etc. Supper comes at half-past
-five, and after that the night work begins, making the beds smooth and
-comfortable for the poor, tired bodies, giving out medicines, and putting
-the wards straight for the house physician’s visit. The head nurse goes
-from bed to bed with him, giving a report of each patient, that suitable
-directions may be given the night nurse. At eight o’clock the nurses go
-off duty, tired perhaps, but happy in the consciousness that they have
-done their best. Every nurse has an hour off during the day, for rest or
-exercise in the open air, with an afternoon once a week.
-
-And now let me appeal to the female portion of the tens of thousands
-of readers of THE CHAUTAUQUAN, at least to those of them who want a
-vocation. Will you not take up this work? You will find a rich reward in
-so doing, not only financially (though it is a paying business), but the
-gladness and content you will feel in doing your share toward relieving
-the suffering and distress in this world will amply repay you for the
-hard and disagreeable part of your labor—for it has its disagreeable
-side, I admit. No one has greater opportunities for doing good than
-the loyal, consecrated Christian nurse. Just think of the many cups of
-cold water that can be given, the sweet word of Scripture that can be
-whispered in the ear of some sufferer, to prove a soft and comforting
-pillow for his weary head. Think of the bread of life it will be your
-privilege to break and distribute to the helpless and needy. Think of
-the dying who can be pointed upward, and led to place their trust in Him
-who is the Resurrection and the Life. If you have a talent for music,
-it can be used to advantage in the hospital ward. There is no limit to
-the opportunities you will find opening before you. We can not all be
-Florence Nightingales or Sister Doras, but we can be our best selves.
-
-
-
-
-EIGHT CENTURIES WITH WALTER SCOTT.
-
-By WALLACE BRUCE.
-
-
-“Woodstock” closed with the return of Charles the Second from long exile,
-and his hearty reception _en route_ from the cliffs of Dover to London.
-“Peveril of the Peak” opens with a mixed assembly of Presbyterians
-and Cavaliers convened at Martindale Castle in honor of “The Blessed
-Restoration of His most Sacred Majesty.”
-
-As might be premised, the gathering is not entirely harmonious. By wise
-foresight they are constrained to enter the castle by different gates,
-and to take their repast in different rooms. In this prologue to the
-story the reader notes the art with which Scott illustrates history.
-“By different routes, and forming each a sort of a procession, as if
-the adherents of each party were desirous of exhibiting its strength
-and numbers, the two several factions approached the castle; and so
-distinct did they appear in dress, aspect and manners, that it seemed as
-if the revelers of a bridal party, and the sad attendants upon a funeral
-solemnity, were moving toward the same point from different quarters. The
-Puritan party consisted chiefly of the middling gentry, with others whom
-industry or successful speculations in commerce or in mining had raised
-into eminence—the persons who feel most umbrage from the over-shadowing
-aristocracy, and are usually the most vehement in defense of what they
-hold to be their rights. Their dress was in general studiously simple
-and unostentatious, or only remarkable by the contradictory affectation
-of extreme simplicity or carelessness. The dark color of their cloaks,
-varying from absolute black to what was called sad-colored, their
-steeple-crowned hats, with their broad shadowy brims, their long swords,
-suspended by a simple strap around the loins, without shoulder-belt,
-sword-knot, plate, buckles, or any of the other decorations with which
-the Cavaliers loved to adorn their trusty rapiers—the shortness of their
-hair, which made their ears appear of disproportioned size—above all the
-stern and gloomy gravity of their looks, announced their belonging to
-that class of enthusiasts, who, resolute and undismayed, had cast down
-the former fabric of government, and who now regarded with somewhat more
-than suspicion that which had been so unexpectedly substituted in its
-stead.”
-
-The paragraph in which Scott portrays the Cavalier is none the less
-graphic: “If the Puritan was affectedly plain in his dress, and
-ridiculously precise in his manners, the Cavalier often carried his
-love of ornament into tawdry finery, and his contempt of hypocricy into
-licentious profligacy. Gay, gallant fellows, young and old, thronged
-together toward the ancient castle. Feathers waved, lace glittered,
-spears jingled, steeds caracoled; and here and there a petronel or pistol
-was fired off by some one, who found his own natural talents for making
-a noise inadequate to the dignity of the occasion. Boys halloo’d and
-whooped, ‘Down with the Rump,’ and ‘Fie upon Oliver!’ The revelry of the
-Cavaliers may be easily conceived, since it had the usual accompaniments
-of singing, jesting, quaffing of healths, and playing of tunes, which
-have in almost every age and quarter of the world been the accompaniments
-of festive cheer. The enjoyments of the Puritans were of a different and
-less noisy character. They neither sung, jested, heard music, nor drank
-healths; and yet they seemed none the less, in their own phrase, to enjoy
-the creature-comforts which the frailty of humanity rendered grateful to
-their outward man.”
-
-It seems almost marvelous that Scott, who loved rank and ancestral
-dignity, could lay aside his prejudices and speak so eloquently and
-fairly of the Puritan. His history of Napoleon is generally regarded
-unfair and distorted; and it could hardly have been otherwise following
-so closely upon the great triumph of Wellington; but we, as Americans and
-descendants of those who gave up home and comfort to establish a free
-government, have reason to feel grateful that the greatest novelist, or,
-if that is objected to by any of our readers, the greatest historical
-novelist that Britain has produced, was born and reared with an
-unprejudiced mind.
-
-It may seem strange to the reader of history to find the Cavalier and
-the strict Presbyterian, so different in principle, now hand in hand in
-policy; but the reader must remember that the party which brought Charles
-to the block consisted of two factors, styled by the haughty Countess of
-Derby with indignant sarcasm: “Varieties of the same monster, for the
-Presbyterians hallooed while the others hunted, and bound the victims
-whom the Independents massacred.” Misery according to Shakspere makes a
-person acquainted with strange bedfellows; and the politics of those days
-made England acquainted with strange coalitions. One choice only remained
-to that distracted nation—Charles the Second or the rule of the army;
-and to the common sense of discordant factions a solid government seemed
-preferable to anarchy. To the sensible Presbyterian the divine right
-of kings was better than the less divine right of petty leaders. The
-Independents, so powerful under Cromwell, were weak under the government
-of his son Richard. The people demanded a free Parliament, and a free
-Parliament meant the restoration of the Stuarts. As Macaulay tersely puts
-it: “A united army had long kept down a divided nation; but the nation
-was now united and the army was divided.”
-
-Scott, also, in passing, refers to the ejection of the Presbyterian
-clergy, which took place on St. Bartholomew’s day, when two thousand
-Presbyterian pastors were displaced and silenced throughout England;
-even in church matters the rule held good—that the spoils belonged to
-the victors: the great Baxter, Reynolds and Calamy refused bishoprics,
-and many ministers declined deaneries, preferring starvation and a clear
-conscience to the wealth and flattery of a corrupt court.
-
-Five years pass by and we are transported with Julian Peveril, son of
-the old knight, from the peaks of northern Derbyshire, which form the
-water-shed of central England, to the picturesque island of Man, the
-origin of whose name is still a mystery, whose ruins carry the visitor
-back beyond the legends of King Arthur and the dominion of the Romans to
-the dim twilight days of the Druids. To this strong sea-girded fortress
-the brave Countess of Derby fled after the execution of her husband at
-Bolton le Moor, and she has left in history a character for courage and
-hardihood allied to cruelty, in the execution of Edward Christian, who
-in her absence had yielded up the island to the Parliament forces. It is
-here that the young Peveril dreams away his boyhood, sharing his studies
-and recreations with the son of the Countess.
-
-In this story of diverse characters, the two pillars, which might be said
-to uphold the arch, under which the long procession of the narrative
-passes, are the elder Peveril and his wealthy neighbor Bridgenorth.
-Alice Bridgenorth was reared under the same roof with young Peveril;
-and strange to say, in the difference arising between the elder Peveril
-and Bridgenorth, she also is transported to the home of relatives in a
-romantic glen of the island of Man. But the course of true love was not
-destined even in this little island to run entirely smooth; for the old
-spirit of Bridgenorth is awakened to restore England to the greatness
-of the days of Cromwell. He endeavors to arouse the same zeal in young
-Peveril; he had just returned from the south of France, and had many
-stories to tell of the French Huguenots, who already began to sustain
-those vexations, which a few years afterward were summed up by the
-revocation of the edict of Nantz. He had been in Hungary, and spoke from
-personal knowledge of the leaders of the great Protestant insurrection.
-He talked also of Savoy, where those of the reformed religion still
-suffered a cruel persecution. He had even visited America, more
-especially he said: “The country of New England, into which our land has
-shaken from her lap, as a drunkard flings from him his treasures, so much
-that is precious in the eyes of God and of his children. There thousands
-of our best and most godly men—such whose righteousness might come
-between the Almighty and his wrath, and prevent the ruin of cities—are
-content to be the inhabitants of the desert, rather encountering the
-unenlightened savages, than stooping to extinguish, under the oppression
-practiced in Britain, the light that is within their own minds. There I
-remained for a time, during the wars which the colonies maintained with
-Philip, a great Indian chief, or sachem as they were called, who seemed
-a messenger sent from Satan to buffet them. His cruelty was great—his
-dissimulation profound; and the skill and promptitude with which he
-maintained a destructive and desultory warfare inflicted many dreadful
-calamities on the settlement. I was by chance at a small village in
-the woods, more than thirty miles from Boston, and in its situation
-exceedingly lonely, and surrounded with thickets. It was on a Sabbath
-morning, when we had assembled to take sweet counsel together in the
-Lord’s house. Our temple was but constructed of wooden logs; but when
-shall the chant of trained hirelings, or the sounding of tin and brass
-tubes amid the aisles of a minster, arise so sweetly to heaven, as did
-the psalm in which we united at once our voices and our hearts! An
-excellent worthy, long the companion of my pilgrimage, had just begun to
-wrestle in prayer, when a woman, with disordered looks and disheveled
-hair, entered our chapel in a distracted manner, screaming incessantly,
-‘The Indians! the Indians!’ In that land no man dares separate himself
-from his means of defense, and whether in the city or in the field, in
-the ploughed land or the forest, men keep beside them their weapons, as
-did the Jews at the re-building of the temple. So we sallied forth with
-our guns and our pikes, and heard the whoop of these incarnate devils
-already in possession of a part of the town. It was pitiful to hear the
-screams of women and children amid the report of guns and the whistling
-of bullets, mixed with the ferocious yells of these savages. Several
-houses in the upper part of the village were soon on fire. The smoke
-which the wind drove against us gave great advantage to the enemy, who
-fought, as it were invisible, and under cover, whilst we fell fast by
-their unerring fire. In this state of confusion, and while we were about
-to adopt the desperate project of evacuating the village, and, placing
-the women and children in the center, of attempting a retreat to the
-nearest settlement, it pleased heaven to send us unexpected assistance.
-A tall man of a reverend appearance, whom no one of us had ever seen
-before, suddenly was in the midst of us. His garments were of the skin
-of the elk, and he wore sword and carried gun; I never saw anything more
-august than his features, overshadowed by locks of gray hair, which
-mingled with a long beard of the same color. ‘Men and brethren,’ he
-said in a voice like that which turns back the flight, ‘why sink your
-hearts? and why are you thus disquieted? Follow me, and you shall see
-this day that there is a captain in Israel!’ He uttered a few brief but
-distinct orders, in the tone of one who was accustomed to command; and
-such was the influence of his appearance, his mien, his language, and
-his presence of mind, that he was implicitly obeyed by men who had never
-seen him until that moment. We were hastily divided into two bodies;
-one of which maintained the defense of the village with more courage
-than ever; while, under cover of the smoke, the stranger sallied forth
-from the town, at the head of the other division of New England men, and
-fetching a circuit, attacked the red warriors in the rear. The heathens
-fled in confusion, abandoning the half-won village, and leaving behind
-them such a number of the warriors, that the tribe hath never recovered
-its loss. Never shall I forget the figure of our venerable leader,
-when our men, and women and children of the village, rescued from the
-tomahawk and scalping knife, stood crowded around him. ‘Not unto me be
-the glory,’ he said, ‘I am but an implement, frail as yourselves, in the
-hand of Him who is strong to deliver.’ I was nearest to him as he spoke;
-we exchanged glances; it seemed to me that I recognized a noble friend
-whom I had long since deemed in glory; but he gave me no time to speak,
-had speech been prudent. Sinking on his knees, and signing us to obey
-him, he poured forth a strong and energetic thanksgiving for the turning
-back of the battle, which, pronounced with a voice loud and clear as a
-war trumpet, thrilled through the joints and marrows of the hearers. I
-have heard many an act of devotion in my life; but such a prayer as this,
-uttered amid the dead and the dying, with a rich tone of mingled triumph
-and adoration, was beyond them all—it was like the song of the inspired
-prophetess who dwelt beneath the palm-tree between Ramah and Bethel. He
-was silent; and for a brief space we remained with our faces bent to the
-earth—no man daring to lift his head. At length we looked up, but our
-deliverer was no longer amongst us, nor was he ever again seen in the
-land which he had rescued.”
-
-This beautiful story, true to fact, and so dramatically told, comes upon
-the reader with a pleasant surprise, and I have quoted it at length not
-only for its intrinsic beauty, but also as it commemorates a fact in the
-early history of our country. That venerable man was Richard Whalley, one
-of the great soldiers of England under Cromwell, and one of the judges
-who condemned Charles to the block. After the restoration he fled to
-Massachusetts, and was secreted in the house of the Rev. Mr. Russel at
-Hadley. It will be remembered that three of the regicides fled to this
-country—Dixwell, Goffe and Whalley. Dixwell is buried in New Haven in
-the rear of Center church. Goffe and Whalley are buried in Hadley. It
-is claimed by some that it was Goffe instead of Whalley who came to the
-rescue of the village. Scott in his notes assigns the honor to Whalley.
-
-Returning to our story we find that affairs of great moment on the part
-of the Countess call the young Peveril to London. He finds his father and
-mother arrested for supposed complicity in a Romish plot. We see the city
-in great excitement, heated and inflamed by the villain Oates—an episode
-which Scott weaves gracefully and naturally into the warp and woof of
-his story. He draws a picture of Colonel Blood, who made the well-known
-attempt on the crown-jewels, a bold, resolute man, who strange to say,
-after many acts of violence, lived to enjoy a pension from the king. We
-see the gay Rochester, still remembered for his celebrated epigrammatic
-epitaph on Charles the Second, composed at the king’s request, but too
-pungent, and too true to be relished.
-
- “Here lies our sovereign lord the king,
- Whose word no man relies on;
- He never said a foolish thing,
- And never did a wise one.”
-
-We see the Duchess of Portsmouth, and many another lady of rank, who had
-more regard for ancient titles than for ancestral virtues; we see George
-Villiers, Duke of Buckingham, a man of princely fortune and excellent
-talents, tossed about in a whirlpool of frivolous pleasures, whose
-character the great Dryden embalmed in vigorous lines:
-
- “A man so various, that he seemed to be
- Not one, but all mankind’s epitome;
- Stiff in opinions—always in the wrong—
- Was everything by starts, but nothing long;
- Who in the course of one revolving moon,
- Was chemist, fiddler, statesman, and buffoon.”
-
-Through the imprisonment of Julian Peveril we are made acquainted with
-the Tower and Newgate—a sad picture, but somewhat relieved by Scott’s
-humor in the portrait that he gives us of the well-known doughty
-dwarf, Sir Geoffrey Hudson; we see London given over to monopolies, to
-stock-jobbing, and South Sea speculations; we attend a conventicle held
-in a secret hall of the city, and trace a conspiracy designed to place
-the Duke of Buckingham upon the throne; until our story, one of the
-longest and most carefully prepared of the Waverley series, concludes
-with a court scene in Whitehall, where the faithful love of Edith
-Bridgenorth and Julian Peveril is announced to the satisfaction at least
-of two individuals.
-
-“Old Mortality,” our next volume, deals directly with the Covenanters
-of Scotland. It will be remembered that Charles the Second, on a former
-expedition into Scotland, before his restoration, had deliberately sworn
-to support the Solemn League and Covenant. The Presbyterian Church, alive
-to its own interests, sent an agent to General Monk, who had declared for
-a free Parliament, and was on his way to London, holding as it were in
-his hand the destiny of Britain. The agent sent by the Scottish Church
-was James Sharpe, a man well educated, logical in mind and commanding in
-character; but, false to his trust, he bartered his principles for power,
-and received as the price of his infamy the title and office of Lord
-Bishop of Saint Andrews, and Primate of Scotland. “The great stain” says
-Scott, in his Miscellaneous Prose Works, “will always remain, that Sharpe
-deserted and probably betrayed a cause which his brethren entrusted to
-him. When he returned to Scotland, he pressed the acceptance of the See
-of Saint Andrews upon Mr. Robert Douglas, affecting himself no ambition
-for the prelacy. The stern Presbyterian saw into his secret soul, and,
-when he had given his own positive rejection, demanded of Sharpe what
-he would do if the offer was made to him? He hesitated. ‘I perceive,’
-said Douglas, ‘you are clear—you will engage—you will be Primate of
-Scotland; take it then,’ he added, laying his hand on his shoulder, ‘and
-take the curse of God along with it.’ The subject would suit a painter.”
-Subsequent history shows that the curse was fulfilled.
-
-In the general joy attendant upon the restoration of Charles, the
-Parliament thought that the people would submit to almost any indignity
-or inconvenience. By a single sweeping resolution they annulled and
-rescinded every statute and ordinance which had been made by those
-holding supreme authority in Scotland since the commencement of the civil
-wars; the whole Presbyterian Church government was destroyed, and the
-Episcopal institutions, to which the nation had shown itself averse, were
-rashly and precipitately established. Thousands of ministers, who, for
-conscience sake, could not sign the Act of Conformity, were driven from
-their pulpits. Mere boys and dissolute young men were hastily summoned
-from schools and colleges to administer spiritual comfort to an indignant
-people. The solemn league and covenant, which had been solemnly sworn to
-by nobility, clergy and people, with weeping eyes and uplifted hands, ay,
-sworn to by the King himself, was burned at the cross of Edinburgh by an
-edict of Parliament. The Episcopal court severely punished all who left
-their own parish church to attend private meetings known as conventicles.
-A persecution like that of the early Christians at Rome was brought home
-to the descendants of Knox and of Calvin. As the earlier Christians were
-compelled to hold their meetings in caves and catacombs, so a persecuted
-people, in the bright dawn of the Reformation, were compelled to fly to
-the hills and heaths for a refuge, to lift up their banner in solitary
-and mountain places in order to foil
-
- “A tyrant’s and a bigot’s laws.”
-
-Such was the state of the country at the opening of our story in May,
-1679. The west of Scotland is aroused. Archbishop Sharpe is murdered in
-his carriage, by a party of men, of whom Balfour of Burley is the leader.
-The battle of Loudon Hill is won by the Covenanters, who increase daily
-in power until a force of six thousand men are assembled at Bothwell
-Bridge. Engaged in discussing church polemics, they entirely neglect
-the discipline necessary for success. Without leaders or guidance they
-are routed by the Duke of Monmouth. Four hundred men are killed. Twelve
-hundred prisoners are marched to Edinburgh, and imprisoned “like cattle
-in a fold” in the Greyfriar’s churchyard. Several ministers are tortured
-and executed, and many prisoners sent as slaves to the plantations. Henry
-Morton, one of their leaders, as seen in the story, is exiled. Edith
-Bellenden, one of the royal party, remains true to him. He returns, after
-long years of absence and military honor, and readers of fiction can
-readily guess how the story terminates without reading the postscript by
-the author.
-
-Such is the rude draft of this great romance, which Coleridge pronounces
-the grandest of Scott’s novels. It is, in fact, a novel that can not
-be well analyzed. We could speak of Lady Margaret Bellenden, who never
-forgot that Charles the Second took breakfast with her on his way to meet
-Cromwell at the field of Worcester; we could speak of the good natured
-Major, brave, noble, and generous; of Cuddie and his mother; ay, of Guse
-Gibbie, unfortunate in all fitting regimentals; of the miserly uncle of
-Henry Morton; of the cannie waiting-maid of Edith, who felt safe in the
-triumph of either side, as she had a lover in both armies. The reader
-will laugh and weep at these characters as he meets them in the pages
-of “Old Mortality.” But it is for us to refer merely to the historical
-features about which these characters are grouped; to note the ruggedness
-of Scotch character, destined to triumph at last, and bring victory
-out of defeat; a character which, perhaps, “shows most to advantage in
-adversity, when it seems akin to the native sycamore of their hills,
-which scorns to be biased in its mode of growth, even by the influence of
-the prevailing wind, but, shooting its branches with equal boldness in
-every direction, shows no weather side to the storm, and may be broken,
-but can never be bended.”
-
-In considering the motives, the ambition, the enthusiasm, or fanaticism
-of these men, we might stir up controversy. We know it was their
-lofty purpose to convert all England to the Presbyterian faith; and,
-whenever they were lifted to power, they were quite as arbitrary as the
-Episcopacy. It was true of both parties that they suffered persecution
-without learning mercy. Each side felt that, in pushing its own creed,
-it was doing the Lord’s work; but in this we all delight to-day, that
-both sides produced brave men, tenacious of their own rights, who
-struggled on until in our own generation the opposing forces have been
-adjusted, and out of chaos and confusion the different systems of faith
-or theology move serenely and calmly in their own spheres around one
-central and enduring light—the Creator and Father of all.
-
-The Covenanters were indeed the connecting link between the two great
-revolutions, which beheaded Charles the First and exiled James the
-Second; and, whatever our prejudices, or “whatever may be thought of
-the extravagance or narrow-minded bigotry of many of their tenets, it
-is impossible to deny the praise of devoted courage to a few hundred
-peasants, who, without leaders, without money, without any fixed plan of
-action, and almost without arms, borne out only by their innate zeal, and
-a detestation of the oppression of their rulers, ventured to declare open
-war against an established government, supported by a regular army and
-the whole force of three kingdoms.”
-
-It is sometimes claimed that Scott is over partial to Claverhouse—that
-he paints the man as a hero. If so he has poorly succeeded, for I have
-yet to meet a reader of “Old Mortality” who is fascinated with the
-portraiture of that cruel man. Scott makes him what history declares
-him to be, a cool and calculating soldier, bitter and unrelenting, a
-man without faith, and with no ambition save worldly glory. It rather
-seems to me on the contrary, that Scott for the time lays aside his own
-traditional sentiments as he reports the burning words of these Covenant
-preachers, as they paint the desolation of the Church, describing her
-“like Hagar watching the waning life of her infant amid the fountainless
-desert.” His poetic nature seems moved by brave men repairing “to worship
-the God of nature amid the fortresses of nature’s own construction.”
-
-There are two dramatic scenes in the volume, which can not be overlooked
-or forgotten: Burley in the cave, with his clasped Bible in one hand, and
-his drawn sword in the other. “His figure, dimly ruddied by the light
-of the red charcoal seems that of a fiend in the lurid atmosphere of
-Pandemonium striving with an imaginary demon.” The other scene reveals
-Henry Morton, overpowered, disarmed, bound hand and foot, facing a clock
-which, at the hour of twelve, was to strike his doom. “Among pale-eyed
-and ferocious zealots, whose hardened brows were soon to be bent, not
-merely with indifference, but with triumph upon his execution—without
-a friend to speak a kindly word, or give a look of either sympathy or
-encouragement—awaiting till the sword destined to slay him crept out
-of the scabbard gradually, as it were by straw-breadths, and condemned
-to drink the bitterness of death drop by drop. His executioners, as he
-gazed around him, seemed to alter their forms and features, like specters
-in a feverish dream their figures became larger, and their faces more
-disturbed; the walls seemed to drop with blood, and the light tick of
-the clock thrilled on his ear with such loud, painful distinctness, as
-if each sound were the prick of a bodkin inflicted on the naked nerve
-of the organ.” The maniac preacher, in an attitude of frenzy, springs
-upon a chair to push forward the fatal index; the party make ready their
-weapons for immediate execution, when a noise like the rushing of a brook
-over the pebbles, or the soughing of wind among the branches stays the
-executioners; it was the galloping of horse, the door is burst open, and
-Henry Morton is saved.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Men seem neither to understand their riches nor their strength—of the
-former they believe much more than they should; of the latter much less.
-Self-reliance and self-denial will teach a man to drink out of his own
-cistern, and eat his own sweet bread, and to learn and labor truly to
-get his living, and carefully to expend the good things committed to his
-trust.—_Bacon._
-
-
-
-
-A PRIVATE CHARITY OF PARIS.
-
-Translated from the French for THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
-
-Among the many interesting charitable institutions of Paris there is none
-more noteworthy than the private asylum for the blind conducted by the
-Sisters of St. Paul. This work was begun in 1850, by a woman of great
-piety, energy and sense, Anne Bergunion. Two blind girls were confided to
-her care. She proved to be remarkably adapted to training the peculiar
-characters which the nature of this affliction almost invariably causes.
-Gradually there grew up a large institution under her supervision. A
-writer in a late number of the _Revue des deux Mondes_ has given an
-exhaustive account of the work. The details are most interesting and
-suggestive. After describing the home of the Sisters and their work, he
-says: “They have reserved the least comfortable part of the building for
-themselves, and have given over to the blind the large rooms where the
-circulation is free, and there is opportunity for exercise. Passing from
-the convent into the asylum for the blind, I entered the workshop. Twenty
-workingwomen, whose ages ranged from twenty-five to fifty, started up
-at the sound of strange footsteps. The sight was pitiful; the faces and
-eyes seemed expressionless. There was nothing to warm up their terrible
-pallor, and in their attitude there was a restless attention, as if they
-were troubled by a presence which they could not define nor understand.
-
-“There is great difference between the different forms of blindness.
-There are eyes that have been paralyzed, which appear living, but yet
-are dead. They show neither joy nor sorrow, but remain fixed. A blind
-person does not move the eye when questioned, but by an unconscious
-gesture turns the ear to the speaker. Others are projecting, and seem
-almost bursting from their watery eyelids; they look like those marbles
-of whitish glass with which the children play; others again are almost
-invisible, showing only an inflamed line between the nearly closed
-eyelids. With some the lids are immovable; others continually flutter,
-like the wings of a frightened bird.
-
-“I saw no coquettishness in the arrangement of the hair, in the pose
-of the head or the body. Shut up in darkness, they are ignorant of the
-resources of feminine graces; hearing and touch teach them nothing of
-them. Their tidiness is extreme, however. If well taught, a blind person
-can not endure on his garments a particle of dust or drop of water; it
-wounds his sensitive touch.
-
-“The most of the inmates were born blind, or at least became blind so
-young that they have no remembrance of the light. For them the sun is
-bright, not because it shines, but because it is warm. There are some
-among them who have been made completely blind by an accident or a
-criminal action. Here is one whose eyes seem to have been torn out, and
-eyelids to have closed over the void. When she was quite a little girl,
-she owned a tame finch; at night it slept in its cage, but all day it
-was at the side of its young mistress, now on her head, again on her
-shoulders; it drank from the same glass with her and took the food from
-her lips. One day the eyes of the child attracted it; it picked at them
-and destroyed the sight. There is another who had a pet chicken. She had
-been accustomed to taking it in her little arms, rocking it, cuddling it,
-adoring it; they played together until suddenly, one day, the chicken,
-dashing itself against the face of the child, tore out both its eyes.
-
-“I have noticed among the inmates a woman whose eyes are white; a faint
-shade marks the outline of the iris. She seems to be about fifty years
-old; her complexion is sallow, and above her prominent forehead the brown
-hair is traced by silver; her mouth has a sad, almost bitter expression;
-her form is thin, and her bony fingers move very swiftly as she knits.
-When twenty-three years old she was sought in marriage by a young man
-for whom she did not care. He insisted, she refused. One evening he came
-to see her with a gun on his shoulder, and demanded: “Will you marry me?
-Yes, or no.” “No,” she replied. He drew his weapon and fired. The entire
-charge hit the upper part of her face. When they had picked her up and
-wiped away the blood, they saw that she was blind, and hopelessly so.
-Before the court the fellow did not lie. “It is her own fault. I will
-marry her all the same, if she is willing.” The poor girl did not think
-it best to give her hand, when asked in this way. She found the Sisters
-of St. Paul, and has been with them for twenty-five years.
-
-“It seemed very silent to me in the work-room. I am sorry for it.
-Conversation is as necessary to the blind as light for those who see;
-to them silence is night, noise is light. This is so true that in the
-Institution for Blind Young People, the black cell, the cell in which
-unruly members are confined as a punishment, is one where no sound is
-heard. I believe that conversation should always be allowed. The blind
-find an inspiration in it which gives zest to their work.
-
-“Music is their great passion, and some excel in it; the ear is most
-sensitive; at a sound in the least out of tune their foreheads will
-contract painfully. A woman sang for me here. She was about thirty-five
-years old, with pale face and fine features. She sang a fandango intended
-to be gay, but which was very mournful, coming from her discolored lips.
-Her voice was true but weak and worn. The poor girl is a worn-out artist.
-She had been dragged from city to city; had “done” the watering places
-and springs, had given concerts, and never touched the proceeds. When
-she had ruined her voice the manager had abandoned her. The poor child,
-hungry and cold, sought the St. Paul Asylum. She has a shelter here while
-she lives. She knits, sings, and, perhaps, sighs for the time when she
-heard the crowd clap after she had sung her piece.
-
-“A blind Sister, with one who has her sight, looks after the workshop.
-There is but one kind of work here—knitting; it seems to have become
-mechanical; they knit without thinking, as one breathes without knowing
-it. Four of the young girls sang a quartette for us, but they knit all
-the time without ceasing; the blind Sister beat time with her head, but
-continued to knit; the women in the shop turned toward the singers,
-listened, and knit. The blind Sisters teach this work. It takes about
-six weeks to make a skillful knitter, and initiate her into all the
-mysteries. They earn very little money in this way, however. The wool
-and patterns are furnished by the contractor, and for the knitting of a
-pair of child’s socks they will pay but a few cents. It takes a skillful
-knitter at least four hours to do the work, and then the work must be
-finished off by some one who sees, the buttons put on, the buttonholes
-made, and the ornaments attached. In spite of the great industry of the
-workers the shop earns in this way only about 1,300 francs per year. The
-great curse which burdens the blind, above all blind women, is that they
-can not earn a livelihood. It is safe to say that were it not for the
-Sisters of St. Paul all the persons whom I saw there would have died of
-hunger. There has been an effort made to find a trade for blind women
-by which they could at least earn their bread; it has not succeeded.
-The affliction is so heavy that it seems to paralyze their energies.
-One trade which seems peculiarly suitable for them, which is learned
-quickly and requires only a little attention, is that of making lines for
-fishing, and the like; the tools needed are not costly, and the trade is
-easy. Many of the blind practice it, and some are very skillful; yet, by
-the busiest day’s work, they can not earn more than fifteen cents. It is
-ridiculous to think of furnishing food, clothing and lodgings, on this
-sum. There has been a great deal of ingenuity spent in trying to teach
-them trades which require great skill; tact, however, can never take the
-place of sight. This fact has been forgotten by those who have tried to
-profit by the services of the blind, rather than put the means of earning
-their daily bread into their hands. An attempt was made to teach them
-to turn articles, but the results were curious rather than useful. The
-trade which they are taught should be as easy as possible; the method
-should be simple, the tools few and easily handled. Knitting is the model
-work for them.
-
-“Passing from the work-room we enter the children’s department. There are
-three classes, corresponding to the ages of the pupils: the intermediate,
-primary, and the school for the very young. Every one is blind, and as
-in the work-room, they knit, or rather learn to knit in the intervals
-between their lessons and play. I find that the same methods for teaching
-reading and writing are used as are common in institutions for the blind.
-The instruments for writing are the point, the tablet, and the guide
-invented by Louis Brille. This system satisfies the intellectual needs
-of the blind, but does not permit them to enter into communication with
-persons who have not studied the system. In this system each letter
-of the alphabet, each figure, each punctuation mark forms in relief a
-certain number of points. By pressing the ends of the fingers over the
-projecting points of these letters a blind person will read as rapidly
-as a person who sees will read the printed volume. Often I have seen
-the blind follow the lines of one of these books with his left hand,
-while with his right he reproduced it on M. Brille’s apparatus. A blind
-man named Foucant invented a very ingenious instrument composed of ten
-blunt points fastened in an iron triangle, and furnished with a spring.
-The instrument is mounted on a guide whose ten ends move in the groove
-of a frame. The apparatus moves on the guide from left to right, as in
-writing, and the guide moves up and down to mark the lines. The base of
-six points are placed in juxtaposition, and rest on a sheet of lead, the
-black surface of which is applied to a sheet of white paper; by striking
-the head of the point there is obtained a black point. By this means
-Roman letters are formed, each letter being composed of several points;
-in one word I counted fifty-eight. By this instrument some of the blind
-write very rapidly, and it is very valuable to them, as it gives them an
-opportunity to correspond with those who see; but this writing, clear as
-it is, has one great drawback; the blind can not read it. The impression
-produced by the stroke of the point is too feeble to be perceptible to
-the most delicate touch. After this invention, there still remained the
-problem of giving the blind a method of writing which could be read by
-them and by those who see. I believe that the problem has been solved.
-Count Jay de Beaufort has invented a very simple system. Abandoning
-the methods of Brille and Foucant, the Roman letters and the English
-writing, he has adopted a kind of heavy sloping style of writing which
-resembles the round hand, and is written wrong side to, like engravers’
-and lithographers’ work. A little time and attention enables the pupil
-to master this style. A sheet of paper, which is at the same time solid
-and soft, is placed on a frame containing a tablet which is marked with
-deep, straight and longitudinal furrows. By these furrows a straight line
-is obtained, and the distance between them determines the height of the
-letters. A light cloth covers the tablet. When the paper is placed on the
-frame and over the cloth, a letter made on it will of course be raised.
-That is, the layer of cloth underneath the paper causes each mark to
-indent the paper without breaking it. With a point or style the letters
-are traced on the paper. When the page is detached and turned over, the
-raised letters appear, recognizable to the eyes, and to the touch of the
-finger. The blind greatly appreciate this system, which is superior to
-all that have been invented for them, for it is the only one which puts
-into their hands a sure means of communication with those who see. Count
-Jay de Beaufort kindly gives lessons at the Institution for Blind Young
-People, and among the Sisters of St. Paul has trained several teachers,
-who in their turn are instructing their pupils.
-
-“The pupils that I saw in the children’s classes are not yet large
-enough to be set at Beaufort’s system. The studies taught there resemble
-those in all primary schools: Reading, writing, numbers, history and
-geography. They omit sewing, which is too difficult, and embroidery,
-which is impossible. Very often they have lessons in composition to teach
-them to unravel their thoughts and express them with precision, a thing
-which is difficult for those who see, but which must be very painful
-for the blind. I wished at one time to assure myself of the degree of
-advancement in the intermediate class, where the girls were from fourteen
-to sixteen years old, and I asked the three most advanced pupils to
-write an essay on a given subject—a walk into the country. Of course the
-subject was interesting only as it was being written on by the blind, and
-I hoped to find some expressions which would denote the peculiar feelings
-which they experienced. But, no; their instruction had come from those
-who could see, and they employed the language of their teachers, not even
-modifying it to fit their infirmity. The three essays were very little
-different in form. They all described a trip which they had taken to
-the suburbs of Paris. “It was a beautiful morning of spring time.” “It
-was a beautiful morning in the month of May,” was the general tone; but
-I shrugged my shoulders in impatience when I read: “What a delightful
-prospect met our view.” It made me think of a composition prepared by a
-deaf mute in which he spoke of “The symphony of the song of the birds,
-and the musical murmur of crystalline springs.” In their desire to
-appropriate feelings which they can not understand, these poor people try
-to reproduce a language which to them can mean nothing.
-
-“There is much that is strange about the dreams of the blind. I was
-struck with this while talking with some young people in the Institute
-for the Blind. They told me complacently of what they “saw” in their
-dreams. I was puzzled to know whether the dream of a blind person was
-like that of one who could see. I have found that the blind who have had
-their sight up to the age of reason, for a long time preserve the dreams
-of the time when they could see, as if the stored-up images reproduced
-themselves in the night. Little by little these images grow feeble,
-become dull, confused, and end by disappearing after fifteen or twenty
-years of blindness. As for those who are born blind, their dreams are in
-black. I convinced myself of this at Saint Paul, where I often talked
-with three blind Sisters, who were very intelligent. They explained to me
-that the phenomena of their dreams were borrowed from the sense of touch
-and hearing, and never from sight.”
-
-
-
-
-SELF-DEPENDENCE.
-
-By MATTHEW ARNOLD.
-
-
- “Ah, once more,” I cried, “ye stars, ye waters,
- On my heart your mighty charm renew;
- Still, still let me, as I gaze upon you,
- Feel my soul becoming vast like you!”
-
- From the intense, clear, star-sown vault of heaven,
- Over the lit sea’s unquiet way,
- In the rustling night-air came the answer:
- “Wouldst thou _be_ as these are? _Live_ as they.
-
- “Unaffrighted by the silence round them,
- Undistracted by the sights they see,
- These demand not that the things without them
- Yield them love, amusement, sympathy.
-
- “And with joy the stars perform their shining,
- And the sea its long moon-silver’d roll;
- For self-poised they live, nor pine with noting
- All the fever of some differing soul.
-
- “Bounded by themselves, and unregardful
- In what state God’s other works may be,
- In their own tasks all their powers pouring,
- These attain the mighty life you see.”
-
-
-
-
-DUTIES OF WOMEN AS MISTRESSES OF HOUSEHOLDS.
-
-By FRANCES POWER COBBE.
-
-
-I have no sympathy at all with those ladies who are seeking to promote
-coöperative housekeeping—in other words, to abolish the institution
-of the home. There may be, indeed, specially gifted women—artists,
-musicians, literary women—whom I could imagine finding it an interruption
-to their pursuits to take charge of a house. But, strange to say, though
-I have had a pretty large acquaintance with many of the most eminent
-of such women, I have almost invariably found them particularly proud
-of their housekeeping, and clever at the performance of all household
-duties, not excepting the ordering of “judicious” dinners. Not to make
-personal remarks on living friends, I will remind you that the greatest
-woman mathematician of any age, Mary Somerville, was renowned for her
-good housekeeping, and, I can add from my own knowledge, was an excellent
-judge of a well-dressed _déjeuner_; while Madame de Staël, driven by
-Napoleon from her home, went about Europe, as it was said, “preceded by
-her reputation and followed by her cook.”
-
-Rather, I suspect, it is not higher genius, but feeble inability to
-cope with the problems of domestic government, which generally inspires
-the women who wish to abdicate their little household thrones. Some
-sympathy may be given to them, but I should be exceedingly sorry to see
-many women catching up the cry and following their leading to the dismal
-_disfranchisement_ of the home—the practical homelessness of American
-boarding-houses or Continental _pensions_. I think for a woman to fail to
-make and keep a happy home is to be a “failure” in a truer sense than to
-have failed to catch a husband.
-
-The making of a true home is really our peculiar and inalienable right—a
-right which no man can take from us; for a man can no more make a home
-than a drone can make a hive. He can build a castle or a palace; but—poor
-creature!—be he wise as Solomon and rich as Crœsus, he can not turn it
-into a home. No masculine mortal can do that. It is a woman, and only
-a woman—a woman all by herself, if she likes, and without any man to
-help her—who can turn a house into a home. Woe to the wretched man who
-disputes her monopoly, and thinks, because he can arrange a club, he can
-make a home! Nemesis overtakes him in his old bachelorhood, when a home
-becomes the supreme ideal of his desires; and we see him—him who scorned
-the home-making of a _lady_—obliged to put up with the oppression of his
-cook or the cruelty of his nurse!
-
-In the first place, if home be our kingdom, it must be our joy and
-privilege to convert that domain, as quickly and as perfectly as we may,
-into a little province of the Kingdom of God; for remember that we may
-look on all our duties in this cheering and beautiful light—first, to set
-up God’s Kingdom in our own hearts, making them pure and true and loving,
-and then to make our homes little provinces of the same kingdom, and,
-lastly, to try to extend that kingdom through the world—the empire of
-Justice, Truth and Love. We are entirely responsible for our own souls,
-and very greatly responsible for those of all the dwellers in our homes;
-and, in a lesser way, we are answerable for each widening circle beyond
-us. How shall we set about making our homes provinces of the Divine
-Kingdom?
-
-1. Nobody must be morally the worse for living under our roof, if we
-can possibly help it. It is the _minimum_ of our duties to make sure
-that temptations to misconduct or intemperance are not left in any one’s
-way, or bad feelings suffered to grow up, or habits of moroseness or
-domineering formed, or quarrels kept hot, as if they were toasts before
-the kitchen fire. As much as possible, on the contrary, everybody must
-be helped to be better—not made better by act of the drawing-room,
-remember—that is impossible—but _helped_ to be better. The way to do
-this, I apprehend, is neither very much to scold, or exhort, or insist
-on people going to church whether they like it or not, or reading family
-prayers (excellent though that practice may be), but rather to spread
-through the house such an atmosphere of frank confidence and kindliness
-with servants, and of love and trust with children and relations, that
-bad feelings and doings will really have no place, no temptation, and, if
-they intrude, will soon die out.
-
-One such point out of many I may cite as specially concerning us women.
-Is it not absurd for a lady who spends hundreds of pounds and thousands
-of hours on her toilet, and takes evident pleasure in attracting
-admiration in fashionable raiment not always perfectly decent, to turn
-and lecture poor Mary Ann, her housemaid, on sobriety in attire, and set
-forth to her the peril and folly of flowers in her bonnet? The mistress
-who dresses modestly and sensibly may reasonably hope in time that her
-servants will dress modestly and sensibly likewise; but certainly they
-will not do so while she exhibits to their foolish young eyes the example
-of extravagance and folly.
-
-2. Next to the _virtue_ of those who live in our homes, their _happiness_
-should occupy us. In the first place, no creature under our roof should
-ever be miserable, if we can prevent it. In how many otherwise happy
-homes is there not one such miserable being? Sometimes, it is the
-sufferers’ own fault; their minds are warped and despairful, and our
-utmost efforts perhaps can only cheer them a little. But much oftener
-there is to be found in a large household some poor creature who has
-fallen, through no fault, into the miserable position of the family
-_butt_—the object of ill-natured and unfeeling jests and rude speeches,
-the last person to be given any pleasure, and the first person to be
-made to suffer any privation or ill-temper. Sometimes, it is a poor
-governess or tutor; sometimes, an old aunt or poor relation; now and
-then, but rarely in these days, a stupid servant; most often of all, a
-child, who is, perhaps, a step-child or nephew or niece of the mistress
-of the house, or, alas! her own child, only deformed in some way, or
-deficient in intellect. Then, the hapless, frightened creature, afraid of
-punishment, looks with furtive glances at the frowning faces about it,
-tries to escape by some little transparent deception, and only incurs
-the heavier penalty of falsehood and the name of a liar; and so the evil
-goes on growing day by day. It is astonishing and horrible to witness
-how the deep-seated, frightful human passion, which I have elsewhere
-named _heteropathy_, develops itself in such circumstances—the sight of
-suffering and down-trodden misery exciting not pity, but the reverse—a
-sort of cruel _aversion_ in the bystanders, till the whole household
-sometimes joins in hating the poor, helpless, and isolated victim.
-
-My friends, if you ever see anything approaching to this in your homes,
-for God’s sake, set your faces like a flint against it! If you dislike
-and mistrust the poor victim yourself, as you probably will do at first,
-never mind! Take my word for it, the first thing to be done in the
-Kingdom of God is to do _justice_ to all—to secure that no creature,
-however mean or even loathsome, should be treated with injustice. If you
-are, as I am supposing, mistress of the house, stop this persecution
-with a high hand; and if you have been in any way to blame in it, if
-it be _your_ dislike which you see thus reflected in the faces of your
-dependants, repent your great fault, and make amends to your victim. If
-you are not mistress, only a guest perhaps, or a humble friend, even then
-you can and ought to do much; you can look grave and pained whenever the
-butt is laughed at and jeered; and you can deliberately fix your eyes on
-him or her with sympathy, and treat him with respect. Even these little
-tokens of condemnation of what is going on will have (you may be sure)
-a startling effect on those whose custom it has become to treat the
-poor soul with contempt; and they will probably be angry with you for
-exhibiting them. You will never have borne resentment for a better cause.
-
-Nor is it only human beings who are thus made too often household
-victims. You must all know houses where some unlucky animal—a cat or
-dog—beginning by being the object of somebody’s senseless antipathy,
-becomes the general _souffre-douleur_ of masters and servants. The dog
-or cat (especially if it happens to be cherished by the human victim) is
-spoken to so roughly, driven out of every room, and perhaps punished for
-all sorts of offences it has never committed, that the animal assumes
-a downcast, sneaking aspect, which inevitably produces fresh and fresh
-_heteropathy_. You attempt, perhaps, to give it a little pat of sympathy,
-and the poor frightened beast snaps at you, expecting a blow, or runs
-off to hide under a sofa. Mistresses of homes, don’t let there be a dog
-or a cat or a donkey or any other creature, in or about your homes,
-which shrinks when a man or woman approaches it. And here I may add
-that, without thus specially victimizing the animals through dislike, a
-household frequently makes the life of some poor brute one long martyrdom
-through neglect. The responsibility for this neglect lies primarily with
-the mistress of the house. She must not only direct her servants, but
-_see that her directions be carried out_, in the way of affording water
-and food and needful exercise. A pretty “Kingdom of Heaven” some houses
-would be, if the poor brutes could speak—houses, possibly, with prayers
-going on twice a day, and grace said carefully before long, luxurious
-meals, and all the time the children’s birds and rabbits left untended in
-foul cages, without fresh food; mice thrown out of the traps on the fire,
-aged or diseased cats or superfluous puppies given to boys to destroy
-in any way their cruel invention may suggest, fowls for the consumption
-of the house carelessly and barbarously killed; and, worst of all, the
-poor house-dog, perhaps some loving-hearted little Skye or noble old
-mastiff or retriever, condemned for life to the penalties which we should
-think too severe for the worst of malefactors; chained up by the neck
-through all the long, bright summer days, under a burning sun, with its
-water-trough unfilled for days, or through the winter’s frost in some
-dark, sunless corner, freezing with cold and in agonies of rheumatism
-for want of straw or the chance of warming itself at a fire or by a run
-in the snow. And all this as a reward for the poor brute’s fidelity!
-When this kind of thing goes on for a certain time, of course the dog
-becomes horribly diseased. His longing to bound over the fresh grass,
-expressed so affectingly by his leaps and bounds when we approach his
-miserable dungeon, is not merely a longing for his natural pleasure, but
-for that which is indispensable to his health—namely, exercise and the
-power to eat grass; and, if refused, he very soon falls into disease;
-his beautiful coat becomes mangy and red; he is irritable, and becomes
-revolting to everybody, and the nurse cries to the children, who were his
-only friends and visitors, “Don’t go near that dog!”
-
-I say it deliberately, the mistress of a house in whose yard a dog is
-thus kept like a _forçat_—only worse treated than any murderer is treated
-in Italy—is guilty of a _very great sin_; and till she has taken care
-that the dog has his daily exercise and water, and that the cat and the
-fowls and every other sentient creature under her roof is well and kindly
-treated, she may as well, for shame’s sake, give up thinking she is
-fulfilling her duties by reading prayers and subscribing to missions.
-
-I assume that the master of the house, where there is one, will, as
-usual, look after the stable department. Where there is no master, or
-he does not interfere, the mistress is surely responsible for humane
-treatment of the horses, if she keep any. Further, I think every lady is
-bound to insist that any horse which draws her shall be free from the
-misery of a bearing-rein. She ought not to allow her vanity and ambition
-to be fashionable to induce her to connive at her coachman’s laziness and
-cruelty.
-
-When the mistress of a house has done all she can to _prevent the
-suffering_, mental or physical, of any creature, human or infra-human,
-under her roof, there remains still a delightful field for her ability
-in actually _giving pleasure_. We all know that life is made up chiefly
-of little pleasures and little pains, and how many of the former are in
-the power of the mistress of a house to provide, it is almost impossible
-to calculate. But let any clever woman simply take it to heart to make
-everybody about her _as happy as she can_, and the result I believe will
-always be wonderful. Let her see that, so far as possible, they have the
-rooms they like best, the little articles of furniture and ornament they
-prefer. Let her order meals with a careful forethought for their tastes
-and for the necessities of their health, seeing that every one has what
-he desires, and making him feel, however humble in position, that his
-tastes have been remembered. Let her not disdain to pay such attention
-to the position of the chairs and sofas of the family dwelling-rooms as
-that every individual may be comfortably placed, and feel that he or she
-has not been left out in the cold. And, after all these cares, let her
-try not so much to make her rooms splendid and æsthetically admirable
-as to make them thoroughly habitable and comfortable for those who are
-to occupy them; regarding their comfort rather than her own æsthetic
-gratification. A drawing-room bright and clean, sweet with flowers in
-summer or with dried rose leaves in winter, with tables at which the
-inmates may occupy themselves, and easy chairs wherever they are wanted,
-and plenty of soft light and warmth, or else of coolness adapted to the
-weather—this sort of room belongs more properly to a woman who seeks to
-make her house a province of the Kingdom of _Heaven_ than one which might
-be exhibited at South Kensington as having belonged to the Kingdom of
-_Queen Anne_!
-
-Then, for the moral atmosphere of the house, which depends so immensely
-on the tone of the mistress, I will venture to make one recommendation.
-Let it be as gay as ever she can make it. There are numbers of excellent
-women—the salt of the earth—who seem absolutely oppressed with their
-consciences, as if they were congested livers. They are in a constant
-state of anxiety and care; and perhaps, with the addition of feeble
-health, find it difficult to get through their duties except in a certain
-lachrymose and dolorous fashion. Houses where these women reign seem
-always under a cloud, with rain impending. Now, I conceive that good and
-even high animal spirits are among the most blessed of possessions—actual
-wings to bear us up over the dusty or muddy roads of life; and I think
-that to keep up the spirits of a household is not only indefinitely to
-add to its happiness, but also to make all duties comparatively light and
-easy. Thus, however naturally depressed a mistress may be, I think she
-ought to struggle to be cheerful, and to take pains never to quench the
-blessed spirits of her children or guests. All of us who live long in
-great cities get into a sort of subdued-cheerfulness tone. We are neither
-very sad nor very glad.
-
-One word in concluding these remarks on woman’s duties as a _Hausfrau_.
-If we can not perform these well, if we are not orderly enough,
-clear-headed enough, powerful enough, in short, to fulfil this immemorial
-function of our sex well and thoroughly, it is somewhat foolish of us to
-press to be allowed to share in the great housekeeping of the State. My
-beloved and honored friend, Theodore Parker, argued for the admission
-of women to the full rights of citizenship and share in government, on
-the express grounds that few women keep house so badly or with such
-wastefulness as Chancelors of the Exchequer keep the State, and womanly
-genius for organization applied to the affairs of the nation would be
-extremely economical and beneficial. But, if we can not keep our houses
-and manage our servants, this argument, I am afraid, will be turned the
-other way; and we shall be told that, _not_ having used our one talent,
-it is quite out of question to give us ten. Having shown ourselves
-incapable in little things, nobody in their senses will trust us with
-great ones.
-
-
-
-
-MILITARY PRISONERS AND PRISONS.
-
-By OLIVER W. LONGAN,
-
-Adjutant General’s Office, War Department.
-
-
-Lest the term “military prisoner” should mislead some reader whose
-recollection of the events of the late civil war, or of the stories
-concerning the treatment of prisoners brings to mind the captured
-soldier and his hardships and sufferings, it should be stated that a
-“prisoner of war” and a “military prisoner” sustain entirely different
-relations to the authority they serve. The former is a prisoner because
-of capture and detention by an enemy. The latter is a prisoner undergoing
-discipline or punishment because of some misdemeanor or crime committed
-against military law or regulations. In the greatest number of cases the
-offense is simply an _absence without leave_, now called _desertion_,
-which is the act of one who wilfully absents himself from his proper
-command with the intention not to return to it again. A military prisoner
-may be called a convict, and he may be a criminal, but either name is
-inappropriate in its ordinary sense. It is true the prisoner has been
-convicted of an offense against a law, but if a single example may be
-used to illustrate the majority, his offense has not been prompted
-by a vicious disposition or an evil nature. His guilt is not such as
-necessarily indicates degraded impulses or base endowments, hence it
-is manifest that a well defined line of separation may easily be drawn
-between the military prisoner and the one who may properly be called a
-criminal or a convict. The reason is also manifest why the institution
-where he is to be detained for punishment should be one especially set
-apart for his class.
-
-It has been stated that the majority of military prisoners have been
-guilty of the one crime of desertion. The fact is the number will
-reach eighty-five or ninety out of every hundred. It is proper in
-this connection to refer to some of the causes or supposed causes for
-the commission of so serious a crime which, if it could be entirely
-prevented, would reduce the number of “military prisoners” to an
-exceedingly small percentage of those who now suffer penalty for a crime
-committed without criminal intent.
-
-The number of men who applied during the last year for enlistment in the
-military service of United States was nearly thirty thousand. Of the
-number applying only about one-third were found qualified. The other
-two-thirds were rejected on account of disqualifications either legal,
-moral, social, mental, or physical. About one-twelfth of those rejected
-were boys under the age of twenty-one years. About the same proportion
-were foreigners who had not sufficient knowledge of the English language
-to enable them to learn their duties. Now, if the standard for acceptance
-be ever so high it can not reach absolute perfection, for there are
-disabilities or disqualifications which it is impossible to discover,
-particularly under the effort which is apt to be made by the applicant
-to conceal his defects, until time and conduct develop them. Manifest
-defects there are in all who are rejected, yet some, in the natural order
-of things must come very near the standard, some again, who reach the
-standard and are accepted, have so little margin upon which they succeed
-that they are separated a very little from those who are rejected.
-
-The motives are various which induce men in time of peace to relinquish
-the privileges enjoyed as civilians, to give up their freedom of movement
-and their right of choice in all things which aid in making up the sum of
-their liberties, and to voluntarily enter into an agreement obligating
-themselves for a term of years to render any service that may be ordered
-by proper authority and accept such remuneration and privileges as may
-be given them by the same authority, and they are perhaps impossible to
-enumerate, but it is known that many seek the service for a livelihood,
-others out of a desire for adventure, others to escape some threatened
-penalty or impending difficulty likely to result from the commission
-of some crime or misdemeanor. Very few enter the first time with any
-intention of making a profession so poorly paid their own, and none, it
-may be, have a good idea of what they are to encounter. They are met at
-the outset with lessons which teach them subordination to a commander
-rather than to a duty. They find that food and clothing are measured to
-them by a rule which makes no discrimination between them, and the one
-with great expectations is under no better care than the one of smallest
-desires. They receive treatment at the hands of petty officers which they
-choose to believe is cause for resentment. They incur sharp rebuke for
-some error or delinquency and seeking redress in their own way, as for an
-injury, they learn that “what in the captain is but a choleric word, in
-the soldier is flat blasphemy.”
-
-Recollections of home, and repentance for the hasty act which separated
-them from it, and many other reasons, both real and imaginary, make them
-feel that they must escape from contact with the source of so many woes,
-and without designing to commit any crime they become “deserters.” It
-must be admitted that the responsibility rests upon the individual as
-the cause is primarily in him, and his surrounding circumstances are
-only secondary, but there is no act called “crime” around which so many
-mitigating circumstances may be found. We must view the matter as a
-disease, the conditions for which are favorable in a service into which
-men are hurried without any instruction in its duties. The _skeleton_
-army, of which so much is required, demands the rapid replenishing of
-new flesh to take the place of the old that has yielded to the disease
-itself. The important question to follow is, what is the remedy and how
-is it applied? A preventive has been sought with care and diligence, but
-none has been found. A remedy then is the only recourse, and this must
-be applied in the shape of discipline or punishment for the offender. If
-he is of an inquiring turn of mind he may learn first of all that there
-is an exact measure of value attached to him as a deserter, and that for
-his capture and delivery to the military authorities the sum of thirty
-dollars will be paid in full liquidation of the service.
-
-A few words concerning the instrumentalities through which the “military
-prisoner” receives his punishment will not be out of place. There are
-three—more correctly four—kinds of tribunals before which a soldier
-may be brought to answer for his misdeeds, and to receive judgment and
-sentence. The first to be mentioned is the “field officer’s court,” which
-can be appointed only in time of war. This court is one officer, either
-a colonel, lieutenant-colonel, or major of a regiment, who is detailed
-by order of a superior officer of the same regiment, or the commander of
-a brigade, division or corps. The officer so detailed is counsel, jury
-and judge, and may try the case of any soldier of his own regiment for
-an offense not capital, and impose sentence. The next in order are the
-“regimental” and the “garrison” court-martial, differing so little except
-in the source of appointment, that they need no separate description.
-They are composed of three officers, and may try and sentence any cases
-not capital. The authority of these courts with respect to the sentences
-they may impose is so limited that ordinarily only petty offenses are
-brought before them, but because of the form of punishment usually
-imposed the results are anything but beneficial, and it is a question
-whether it would not be better to wink at the offense than to sensibly
-degrade the offender and aid him in developing a disposition to repeat
-breaches of discipline until stronger hands are laid upon him. The last
-to be mentioned is the “general court-martial,” the appointment of which
-may be made by the general commanding the army, by the general commanding
-a military department, or in certain cases by the President of the United
-States.
-
-The system of the military courts which have been mentioned is no doubt
-as carefully arranged as can be and contemplates as full recognition of
-the individual rights of the soldier as can be obtained before a civil
-court under civil law for a civilian. The selection of the officers to
-compose the courts is a matter of discretion in the authority appointing
-them, governed only by the exigencies of the service, but after their
-appointment they are under no restrictions with reference to the extent
-of the sentences which they shall impose in the cases of soldiers
-whom they find guilty of desertion, except that in time of peace the
-death penalty can not be inflicted, and in nearly all other cases the
-law declares that the punishment shall be such “as a court-martial
-may direct.” The result of this has been and still is a variation
-in the degrees of punishment for the same offense which defies any
-calculation outside the theory of chances. None can foresee or measure
-the considerations or influences which shall give to any case, the
-circumstances of which can not be just like those of an other case, its
-quality or quantity of punishment. Probably the disposition to administer
-severe discipline with the expectation that a pruning by the reviewing
-authority and a mitigation by the executive authority will most likely
-follow, is the most common cause of inequality in punishments. The remedy
-for the evil in the law which fixes no limit must be sought in other
-legislation, but the possibility of a remedy in a special prison system,
-and a separate prison for military prisoners drew attention to the duty
-of providing an institution where inequalities might be removed.
-
-June 30, 1871, a board of officers was appointed of the Secretary of
-War to investigate the subject of army prisons. The report of this
-board was transmitted to Congress by the honorable Secretary of War
-January 16, 1872, with a draft of a bill for consideration. The closing
-sentence of the letter of transmittal reads as follows: “It is of the
-utmost importance to the efficiency of our army that a thorough and
-practical system of punishment and military discipline be established,
-and experience has proven that the one now in use is wholly inadequate
-to meet the end desired.” After due consideration the Committee on
-Military Affairs of the House of Representatives made a favorable report
-to the House May 7, 1872, in which, after mentioning certain facts
-concerning 384 military prisoners then distributed in the penitentiaries
-of eleven states, and the guard-houses of thirty-two military posts,
-these words occur: “Many of these prisoners have been guilty of crimes
-against military law, and not involving any moral turpitude. They are
-cast into prison with the basest characters and punished with ‘those
-stained by every crime known to the law.’ Your committee feel convinced
-that this can not be done without injury to the prisoner whose offense
-may have been affected with but slight moral obliquity. To prevent this
-unnecessary contamination we think a separate prison should be provided.”
-This was followed within a year by the passage of an act which was
-approved by the President and became a law March 3, 1873, “to provide for
-the establishment of a military prison, and for its government.”
-
-The law required that the prison should be established on Rock Island,
-Illinois, an island in the Mississippi of about 1,000 acres, and about
-180 miles west of Chicago. It is now entirely devoted to the purposes
-of an extensive government arsenal. It also required the appointment of
-a board of commissioners, to consist of three officers of the army and
-two persons from civil life,[B] who were to adopt a plan for a prison
-building and to frame regulations for the prison. Its provisions required
-frequent inspections—twice each year by the Secretary of War and the
-board of commissioners, and four times a year by one of the inspectors
-of the army (monthly inspections are also made by the principal medical
-officer in the Department of the Missouri), all of which were intended
-to be, and are, so many safeguards against any neglect or failure in the
-proper and humane treatment of the prisoners. The law also provided for
-mitigations of sentence for good conduct and industry, for the care
-of the health and physical wants of prisoners. It gave the privilege
-of using newspapers and books, and of writing letters to friends, and
-directed that they be furnished decent clothing on discharge from the
-prison. The location was afterward changed from Rock Island, Illinois,
-to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. This change was authorized by an act of
-Congress approved May 21, 1874, which placed the prison where it is now
-situated, on the west bank of the Missouri river, about thirty miles
-north of Kansas City, Mo., and three miles from the city of Leavenworth,
-Kansas.
-
-To trace the history of the prison through the first decade of its
-existence would be more tedious than interesting. Its progress has
-been similar to that of all other new institutions of this country
-which are destined to become permanent. The obstacles in the way of its
-establishment have not been trifling, and amongst those whose duties
-brought them to take part in its affairs, not all have been favorable
-to the system undertaken, particularly with reference to the idea of
-utilizing the labor of the prisoners for the benefit of the army.
-Prudence and zeal on the part of the commissioners of the prison and the
-commandant have overcome all difficulties, and if there are to-day any
-remaining objections of the kind indicated, they are not proclaimed.
-
-The officers of the prison are a commandant, an executive, an adjutant,
-a commissary, a chaplain, and a surgeon. The guard comprises two
-officers and one hundred men. Within an enclosure of about five acres,
-surrounded by a stone wall averaging in height about 18 feet, surmounted
-at intervals of from two hundred to three hundred feet with brick watch
-towers, are located the offices, the hospital, the chapel, the library,
-the dormitories, the workshops and the store-houses of the prison. The
-buildings, except the hospital, are of stone or brick, and upon all
-of the new buildings, as well as the wall, the work has been done by
-prisoners.
-
-The great features of the institution are quiet and decorum under a kind
-but absolutely firm administration. Its chief object is the reformation
-of its inmates, to which end the efforts of the authorities are
-constantly directed.
-
-The labor of the prisoners is devoted to the manufacture of wagons,
-harness, shoes, boots, clothing, chairs, brooms and brushes, solely for
-army supplies and prison uses; to the manufacture of doors and windows
-and their frames, and to the cultivation of a large farm to obtain
-produce for the prison; also to the incidental work connected with the
-prison in its buildings and repairs and sanitary condition. During the
-eight working hours of each day except Sundays and holidays the hum of
-machinery and the arrival of material and departure of manufactured
-articles give the place the appearance of a large manufactory, and a tour
-through the busy workshops may be made with scarcely a sight of anything
-in dress or appearance to tell of the character of the place as a penal
-institution. The greater number of prisoners being under sentence for
-terms of two years (the sentences are equalized as far as possible by
-executive orders, after the arrival of the men at the prison), the system
-under which they are brought gives them knowledge in some mechanical
-pursuit, trains them in habits of cleanliness, regularity, and sobriety,
-and subjects them to wholesome discipline which, in that length of time,
-must work a “correction of life and manners” as far as any human rule
-can govern the matter. A Christian minister fills the office of chaplain
-and devotes his entire time to the secular and religious instruction
-of the prisoners. A library of 1,300 volumes is open to the use of the
-prisoners, from which they obtain books for reading in leisure hours. As
-an indication of their tastes the kind of books read may be divided by
-the hundred into—light literature 56, magazines 25, biography 6, history
-4, miscellany 4, travels and science each 3, religious 2.
-
-Since the establishment of the prison more than thirty-two hundred men
-have been received, and the average number constantly present is five
-hundred. An abatement of five days for each month of good conduct is
-allowed, and only thirty-seven have failed to obtain their liberty
-prior to the expiration of their full terms. Only twenty-two deaths
-have occurred, showing that even under the disadvantages always present
-in prisons, and with the class of men found there, it is possible to
-reduce the ill effects of prison life upon the physical system to almost
-nothing. Punishment for bad conduct in the prison is in harmony with the
-purposes of the prison, and in most cases the abatement above mentioned
-forms a credit account against which the prisoners are careful not to
-permit debits to be entered. On discharge from prison each prisoner
-receives a suit of clothing and five dollars, and, if his conduct has
-been good, a certificate which may enable him again to enter the service
-as a soldier, if he so desires.
-
-It is not an idle boast to say that the military prison system embodies
-more than the good features of other systems, and in holding reformation
-above punishment, providing food, clothing, treatment and surroundings
-with as little of the stamp of _prison_ upon them as possible, placing
-the control in the hands of officers thoroughly acquainted with the
-service from which the prisoners come and the influences which bring
-them under discipline, shutting out all the evils of the _contract
-system_ under which prisoners are hired out as beasts of burden to toil
-for money which they do not receive, and finally offering them the
-confidence placed only in men intrusted with honorable public service,
-the military authorities have found the method which shall inflict a
-penalty sufficient for the offense and yet develop that sense in the
-prisoner which will, as another self, acknowledge for him that at the end
-of his term he has not paid that penalty in full and is not at liberty
-to incur another. He will also feel that he has received something from
-society and good government which demands from him as a willing subject
-and copartner with all other good citizens of the commonwealth a more
-careful restraint, which must be self-imposed until a correct observance
-of all special obligations and a true attitude in all social relations
-shall become a matter of natural desire.
-
-[B] The places of the civilian commissioners were discontinued by act of
-June 22, 1874.
-
-
-
-
-C. L. S. C. WORK.
-
-By Rev. J. H. VINCENT, D. D., SUPERINTENDENT OF INSTRUCTION.
-
-
-“Addison Day”—Thursday, May 1.
-
-“Special Sunday”—May 11.
-
- * * * * *
-
-All communications descriptive of local circles and their work should be
-sent directly to Dr. T. L. Flood, editor of THE CHAUTAUQUAN, Meadville,
-Pa. The organization, name, postoffice address, and names of officers of
-local circles should be reported to Miss K. F. Kimball, Plainfield, N. J.
-
- * * * * *
-
-The item in this column for April, concerning the badge of the C. L.
-S. C. furnished by Mr. Henry Hart, has been misunderstood. A regular
-official badge of the C. L. S. C. has never yet been adopted, nor is it
-likely that such badge will be chosen for some time to come. The badge
-prepared by Mr. Henry Hart has been highly approved by many members,
-and is widely used. I very much like it, and am glad to know that our
-members like to wear it. Mr. Hart, being an enthusiastic member of the
-C. L. S. C., has advertised the badge widely, and generously proposed to
-give the C. L. S. C. a percentage on the sales. There could have been
-no selfishness in Mr. Hart’s motive in this proposal, and, in declining
-to receive such percentage, I did not reflect upon him in the slightest
-degree. He is an amiable, trustworthy, generous-hearted and honorable
-member of the C. L. S. C., and it will be a long time before another
-badge will be proposed as a substitute for his. Send to Mr. Henry Hart,
-Atlanta, Ga., for a C. L. S. C. badge.
-
- * * * * *
-
-New students of the C. L. S. C. beginning with 1884-’85 will devote the
-most of the year to Greek History and Literature. The “Brief History of
-Greece,” the “Preparatory Greek Course in English,” the “College Greek
-Course in English,” and Readings in THE CHAUTAUQUAN concerning Greek
-Mythology and Ancient Greek Life, will make the first year of the new
-class a “Greek Year.” Members of the classes of ’85, ’86, and ’87, having
-read the Greek History and the Preparatory Greek Course in English, will
-be required to read only the College Greek Course in English and the
-Required Readings in THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
- * * * * *
-
-In addition to the Readings in Greek History and Literature, we shall
-have Readings in Physical Science, in Chemistry, in Zoölogy, etc. Several
-admirable features will enter into the new year’s course.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Let me exhort members of the class of ’84 to be ready for the “Opening of
-the Gate,” August 19, at Chautauqua, or for the “Recognition Services” at
-Framingham, Lakeside, Island Park, Monona Lake, Monteagle, and elsewhere.
-
- * * * * *
-
-President Seelye, of Amherst College, is to deliver the annual address on
-the occasion of the “Recognition” of the class of ’84 at Framingham, Mass.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Counselor Wm. Cleaver Wilkinson will probably deliver the address on
-Commencement Day at Chautauqua, August 19.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Members of the class of 1884 are not required to read the “Hall in the
-Grove,” the “Outline Study of Man,” and “Hints for Home Reading,” but
-will receive a seal for the reading of the “Hall in the Grove,” “Hints
-for Home Reading,” and “Home-College Series” of tracts, price five cents
-each, as follows: No. 1, Thomas Carlyle; No. 2, William Wordsworth; No.
-4, Henry W. Longfellow; No. 8, Washington Irving; No. 13, George Herbert;
-No. 17, Joseph Addison; No. 18, Edmund Spenser; No. 21, William Hickling
-Prescott; No. 23, William Shakspere; No. 26, John Milton. These can be
-obtained of Phillips & Hunt, 805 Broadway, N. Y. City, or of Walden &
-Stowe, Cincinnati, O., or Chicago, Ill.
-
- * * * * *
-
-If, since joining the Circle, one has had to study certain books in order
-to prepare for a teacher’s certificate, and then takes up one of the
-special courses in which some of these books are required, will it be
-necessary to re-read them? Answer: No.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Where are we to put the White and White Crystal Seals after we get the
-blank spaces on the base of the pyramid on the diploma filled up? There
-are only seven spaces at the bottom, and where, after these are filled,
-will we put the two extra ones we receive each year? Answer: On the
-spaces of the pyramid. White Seals as well as special may go on the
-pyramid.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Will a special course in mathematics be added to the list? Answer: There
-will be such a course before long.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Members of Pacific Branch of the class of 1884 are not required to read
-Bushnell’s “Character of Christ,” as announced in the superintendent’s
-address sent out last autumn.
-
- * * * * *
-
-The paragraph quoted from Green, in “Pictures from English History,” pp.
-289-290, should appear under the heading “Edward I.,” page 287, instead
-of as pertaining to “Edward III.”
-
- * * * * *
-
-“My religion is very simple,” said Napoleon to Monge. “I look at this
-universe so vast, so complex, so magnificent, and I say to myself that
-it can not be the work of chance, but the work, however intended, of an
-unknown omnipotent being, as superior to man as the universe is superior
-to the finest machines of human invention.” Search the philosophers
-and you will not find a stronger or more decisive argument. But this
-truth is too succinct for man. He wishes to know respecting himself and
-respecting his future destiny a crowd of secrets which the universe does
-not disclose.
-
-
-
-
-THE CHAUTAUQUA UNIVERSITY.
-
-
-The Chautauqua University is a provision for the higher education of
-persons who, not being able to leave their homes for college, are willing
-to give much time and labor to the prosecution of college studies at
-home, by correspondence under the direction of superior professors.
-
-The curriculum is as comprehensive as that of any college in England or
-America. The memoranda and final written examination are sufficient to
-test the pupil’s work, attainment, and power.
-
-Pupils may take up one or more departments, spending what time they
-please upon each, passing the examinations whenever they are ready.
-
-As each course is finished to the satisfaction of the professor a
-certificate to that effect will be given, and when a required number of
-certificates is in the possession of the student, he will be entitled to
-a diploma and a degree.
-
-The University has nothing to do with the C. L. S. C., which is but as an
-outer court to the temple itself.
-
-The following departments have already been organized:
-
-
-DEPARTMENT OF MODERN LANGUAGES.
-
-German—Dr. J. H. Worman.
-
-French—Prof. A. Lalande.
-
-Spanish—Dr. J. H. Worman.
-
-English.
-
-Anglo-Saxon—Prof. W. D. MacClintock.
-
-
-DEPARTMENT OF ANCIENT LANGUAGES.
-
-Greek—Henry Lummis, A. M.
-
-New Testament Greek—A. A. Wright, A. M.
-
-Latin—E. S. Shumway, A. M.
-
-Hebrew—W. R. Harper, Ph. D.
-
-
-DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS.
-
-Mathematics—D. H. Moore, A. B.
-
-It will be the aim of the Mathematical Department to aid students in
-pursuing thoroughly the regular college mathematical course, and thereby
-in getting the peculiar mental drill derived from the study of pure
-mathematics and in acquiring a facility in its practical application.
-Requirements for entrance:
-
-_Higher Arithmetic._—Including the Metric system.
-
-_Algebra._—The equivalent of Loomis’ Algebra, chapters i-xx, or in other
-treatises everything with the exception of Logarithms and the Theory of
-Equations.
-
-_Geometry._—The equivalent of Chauvenet’s Geometry, Books i-iii, or other
-works up to the discussion of the areas of figures, with _exercises_
-illustrative of the principles of the text; such as are appended to
-Chauvenet, Todhunter’s Euclid, Davies’ Legendre, etc. A readiness in the
-proof of such theorems, and in the accurate solution of such problems
-with rule and dividers is necessary.
-
-
-THE COURSE IN MATHEMATICS.
-
-I.
-
-_Algebra._—Logarithms, Theory of Equations.
-
-_Geometry._—Plane Geometry finished.
-
-II.
-
-_Geometry._—Solid and Spherical.
-
-_Trigonometry._—Plane, Analytical and Spherical.
-
-III.
-
-_Trigonometry._—Applications to Mensuration, Surveying and Navigation.
-
-_Analytical Geometry._
-
- * * * * *
-
-Although it is humiliating to confess, yet I do confess that cleanliness
-and order are not matters of instinct; they are matters of education, and
-like most things—mathematics and classics—you must cultivate a taste for
-them.—_Lord Beaconsfield._
-
-
-
-
-OUTLINE OF C. L. S. C. READINGS.
-
-MAY, 1884.
-
-
-The Required Readings for May are: “Pictures from English History” to
-chapter xxi, page 139; Chautauqua Text-Books No. 4, English History, and
-No. 23, English Literature; and the Required Readings in THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
- * * * * *
-
-_First Week_ (ending May 8).—1. “Pictures from English History,” from
-page 9 to “Dunstan,” page 41.
-
-2. Readings in Roman History in THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
-3. Sunday Readings for May 4 in THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
- * * * * *
-
-_Second Week_ (ending May 16).—1. “Pictures from English History,” from
-page 41 to “The Assassination of Archbishop Becket,” page 75.
-
-2. Readings in Commercial Law in THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
-3. Sunday Readings for May 11 in THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
- * * * * *
-
-_Third Week_ (ending May 23).—1. “Pictures from English History,” from
-page 75 to “Bannockburn,” page 107.
-
-2. Readings in Art in THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
-3. Sunday Readings for May 18 in THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
- * * * * *
-
-_Fourth Week_ (ending May 30).—1. “Pictures from English History,” from
-page 107 to “The Battle of Agincourt,” page 139.
-
-2. Readings in United States History and American Literature in THE
-CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
-3. Sunday Readings for May 25 in THE CHAUTAUQUAN.
-
-
-
-
-LOCAL CIRCLES.
-
-
-The budget of Local Circle letters which strew our table so thickly each
-month brings us from the scattered and lonely members many a bit of
-pathos, of failing courage or of hard experience that makes us long for
-a few moments of personal greeting in which to wish them good cheer and
-good courage. There are numberless lonely readers who feel as an Illinois
-friend who writes us: “I have no outside encouragement. And when I come
-home from the school room I am too tired and sleepy to read anything
-except a newspaper or story. In the morning I have my school work to do,
-and the children’s lessons to look over, so that I have become almost
-discouraged, and have about decided to give up the course.” There is
-many a one who can say with one of our friends: “I have never _seen_ a
-Chautauquan except myself,” or who is like one of our =Texas= school
-teachers: “Hard worked and lonely, with no one with whom to exchange
-views, and no stimulus from a local circle.”
-
-Much discouragement results from poverty. There are many brave, willing
-men and women whose hard struggle to support themselves and those
-dependent upon them make it very difficult for them to obtain even the
-books for the C. L. S. C. One friend writes us from =Texas=: “Our great
-drawback is lack of funds with which to purchase books. To cite my own
-case as an example: I support my aged parents, my young sister (who is
-studying at the State Normal School this year), and myself, all on a
-salary of fifty dollars per month. Of course my first duty is to keep
-myself supplied with educational literature, being a teacher. And when
-the end of each month comes there is little of my salary left with which
-to purchase C. L. S. C. books. I am determined, however, to finish the
-course _some time_—if not in 1886, then in 1896.”
-
-It often happens that the time of a reader is so constantly occupied by
-work that it is only by tireless energy that the reading can be done.
-In a cheery =Ohio= letter we have found a specimen of determination in
-the face of such difficulties, which makes us friends at once with the
-writer. “I have heartily enjoyed the studies, and am only sorry that I
-have not been more successful in my efforts to get others interested. I
-have no intention of severing my connection with the Circle, but shall
-read on until every vacant space on my diploma has its appropriate seal.
-Like many others, I pursue my studies under difficulties. Having no
-one to look to for support I am obliged by my own labor, not only to
-maintain myself, but assist in taking care of my widowed mother. All
-day, and during the busy season until late in the evening, I am confined
-to my place at the cashier’s desk in a large retail dry goods store. No
-chance to read, and not much to think of anything except my work. I go
-home at night too weary in body and brain to do anything but rest up for
-next day’s work. Then again, during dull seasons there are times when I
-can have a book or paper at the store, and occasionally read a few pages,
-consequently my progress is rather irregular.”
-
-The cheerless, dreary distance that separates some of our friends from
-all the conveniences which railroads, telegraph and telephone offer,
-brings its peculiar trials. From the =Great North Woods of Michigan= a
-letter tells how THE CHAUTAUQUAN finds its way to the writer by being
-carried from a postoffice by a “tote” team for twenty-four miles; how
-it often comes wet, torn and crumpled by the carelessness of a careless
-teamster, but it always gets there, and is received eagerly. It is the
-only magazine which goes into those parts, and is looked upon by the
-ignorant woodsmen as something almost beyond their conception, as a
-majority of them can not read or write, and many can not spell their own
-names. The writer adds: “In a few weeks I shall leave the forest, as
-lumbering has commenced to wane for this year, but when I shall think
-of my life in the wilderness among bears, deer and wolves, I shall be
-reminded of the C. L. S. C. as the oasis in the path of my living in the
-woods.”
-
-A similar case is that of a lady who writes from =Norway House, Winnipeg,
-Manitoba=: “You know in our isolated home we are almost shut out from
-the outside world, and have but little communication with it. We receive
-and send letters between three or four times during the year. Our last
-packet came in in September, and now we hope in a few days to receive
-our winter packet.” And from =Rosser, Manitoba=, a letter comes from the
-prairie home of a brother and sister who are reading alone because, as
-they say: “It is impossible for us to form a local circle here, as we
-are comparatively alone. We are not at all discouraged, though without
-lectures or inspiration of any kind, excepting such as we receive from
-the perusal of THE CHAUTAUQUAN. But sometimes we feel a little isolated,
-as regards our connection with the C. L. S. C., away out here in the
-Northwest, and would like to draw a little nearer the Circle.”
-
-It may seem to some that true intellectual culture is not within the
-reach of persons so hampered by circumstances. There is a true and
-strong paragraph in Hamerton’s “Intellectual Life” which may be a help
-to the discouraged: “Intellectual life is really within the reach of
-every one who earnestly desires it.… The essence of intellectual living
-does not reside in extent of science or in perfection of expression,
-but in a constant preference for higher thoughts over lower thoughts,
-and this preference may be the habit of a mind which has not any very
-considerable amount of information.… Intellectual living is not so much
-an accomplishment as a state or condition of the mind in which it seeks
-earnestly for the highest and purest truth. It is the continual exercise
-of a firmly noble choice between the larger truth and the lesser, between
-that which is perfectly just and that which falls a little short of
-justice.” Such life is within the reach of us all, and that it is within
-our reach, whatever be our discouragements, it is the aim of our Circle
-to prove.
-
-_The_ day of February in the C. L. S. C. calendar was, of course,
-Longfellow’s Day. It is long over now, but if we read our letters aright,
-the mirth and pleasure of the time will gladly be recalled. There are so
-many reports that we can only glance at them, though the ring of each
-one is so genuine an expression of a royal good time that we would like
-to give them _in toto_. =Rutland, Vt.=, has three Chautauqua literary
-circles in successful operation, the eldest having already completed
-a two years’ course. At the invitation of Alpha chapter, the three
-circles met for the observance of the poet Longfellow’s birthday. The
-entertainment was a great success. The =Hockawanna, Conn.=, circle
-gave a pleasant entertainment to their friends on the occasion; this
-circle is very prosperous, their excellent “order of exercises” for
-their weekly meetings has one item which each circle should adopt—the
-“social” which follows the literary work. At =Havana, N. Y.=, the circle
-is not, they say, as strong numerically as some of their neighbors, but
-in enthusiasm it is a giant. The Longfellow Memorial Day was observed
-by the circle with exercises whose sentiments, they write us, “Varied
-from the most classical passage of the ‘_Morituri Salutamus_’ to ‘Mr.
-Finney had a turnip, and it grew, and it grew,’” etc. A pretty device
-of the supper with which they closed their evening is new to us: Within
-each napkin was found a souvenir card, adorned with sentiments from
-Longfellow, which were read aloud, amid much mirth as well as pleasure.
-Excellent programs have been forwarded us of the exercises held by the
-circles of =Granville, N. Y.=, =Angelica, N. Y.=, and =Henrietta, N.
-Y.= The local paper of =Phillipsburg, N. J.=, contains an interesting
-account of the memorial evening there, and speaks some kindly words
-about the influence the reading is exerting. The “Frances E. Willard
-Circle,” of =Philadelphia=, enjoyed, as they write, an evening which was
-a thorough success. Dainty cards, bearing their well arranged program,
-and an invitation to be present, reached us. If they were samples of
-the management of the “Memorial,” it must have been a fine success. The
-=Elizabeth, Pa.=, local circle was honored with a full account of their
-Longfellow evening in a local paper. This class numbers over a score of
-deeply interested members; of it the paper sent us says: “This society’s
-aims and advantages are not properly appreciated in the community, or
-it would be besieged with applications for membership.” In =Charleston,
-West Va.=, a delightful two hours were spent over music, essays and
-recitations. One of the pleasantest features was an article by Lyman
-Whiting, D.D., now of Cambridge, Mass., formerly an honored member of
-their circle, giving an account of a visit just made to Longfellow’s
-home, and accompanied by an autograph of the poet, and a leaf from his
-favorite olive tree. Our thanks are due to the Alpha circle of =Atlanta,
-Ga.=, and the Philomathean, of =Sabina, O.=, for programs of their
-evenings with the poet, and our hearty congratulations to the members of
-the circle at =Belding, Mich.=, who are so elated, as no doubt they have
-reason to be, over the success of their first public entertainment. A
-very interesting feature of the memorial at =Plymouth, Indiana=, was the
-music. The song, “The Light of Stars,” and the translation “Beware,” were
-set to music by one of the members, Mr. G. O. Work, a blind gentleman,
-a graduate of the asylum for the blind, at Indianapolis. The circle at
-=Roscoe, Ill.=, gave a public entertainment in honor of the day, which
-was largely attended. This circle has made admirable progress this year,
-increasing from twelve to twenty-six. Among their number is a lady nearly
-eighty-nine years old, who does all the reading, and enjoys it.
-
-At =Waupun, Wis.=, the C. L. S. C. is now in its fifth year. The interest
-is increasing, the circle numbering fourteen members, all ladies, four
-of whom have graduated in the Chautauqua course, but still continue to
-meet with the circle, encouraging it by their presence and interest in
-the Chautauqua work. They held a social and literary entertainment on
-February 26, which was very enjoyable.
-
-Where there are two or more circles in a town, of course the best and
-most social way is to unite. At =La Crosse, Wis.=, the Alpha and Athene
-had a union meeting of this kind on Longfellow’s Day, and at =Des Moines,
-Iowa=, the _six_ Chautauqua circles of the city, with their friends,
-spent the afternoon of the 27th together, and carried out a fine program.
-This city has a population of 35,000. It has two German clubs, a large
-and flourishing French club, several Shakspere clubs and many musical
-societies. With all these it has six Chautauqua classes, the Alpha, the
-branch Alpha, the Sycamore Street, the Rebecca, the Methodist Episcopal,
-the North Hill; all organized in October, 1882; the Vincent, organized
-October, 1883. Is there anywhere an equal to this?
-
-=Burlington, Iowa=, prepared a special program for the evening of their
-Longfellow memorial, and write us that it was the most enjoyable occasion
-of the winter. The prosperous class of twenty-two at =Wyandotte, Kansas=,
-and the one at =Hiawatha=, also remembered the day. This latter circle
-divides itself into two divisions for ordinary occasions, each having its
-president; for all special services they join their forces. The first
-and only Longfellow debate that we met with in examining the reports was
-in the program which we received of the union meeting of the =Omaha=
-and =Council Bluffs= circles. It was no doubt the spice so needful in
-any literary program, and, perhaps, took the place of “Mr. Finney and
-his turnip.” The subject was: “_Resolved_, That the Excelsior Youth was
-a Crank.” The last item comes from the Pacific coast, from the _Daily
-Democrat_, of =Santa Rosa, Cal.=: “The Chautauqua Literary and Social
-Club has had an existence in this city for over three years, and now
-numbers over twenty members, who determined to observe Longfellow’s
-anniversary in a becoming manner. About one hundred invitations were
-issued, and we guess all were accepted. The hall never presented a
-prettier appearance than on that night, and we believe that no audience
-was ever better pleased or more agreeably entertained than those who were
-fortunate enough to receive invitations to be present on that occasion.”
-
-Two villages on the shores of the beautiful =Casco Bay, Me.=, have
-united for work, and send us cheering words of their prosperity. They
-have followed the invaluable plan of supplementing certain branches in
-the course by additional readings; adopting United States History as
-their “special,” they have devoted three months to “Barnes’ History
-of the United States,” a text book used in their public schools. In
-connection with this study they have had readings each evening from
-“Bryant’s Popular History of the United States,” on the most interesting
-topics. We have seen this idea carried out most successfully in a little
-circle of fifteen in =Meadville, Pa.=, the home of THE CHAUTAUQUAN. The
-class decided to spend their time on Art, following as an outline the
-art readings in the course, Lübke, the Britannica, and the new series
-of English “Handbooks of Art” have become their right-hand men, while
-books of travels, stray waifs of description in novels, old newspaper
-pictures, Soule’s photographs, anything and everything obtainable are
-used to strengthen their impression and help them to get clear ideas of
-temples, statues and pictures. Of course all the readings have been done,
-but nothing has been taken up in the circle except art. This “Casco Bay
-Circle” has a method of “keeping up the interest,” which has never failed
-to be attractive since the time of our great-grandfathers’ spelling
-schools. They divided their circle into two sides. The same sides are
-kept each evening, and at the end of the year the defeated side, the
-one that has failed to answer the most questions, is to furnish a treat
-to the victorious one. The secretary adds: “We find that this plan adds
-very much to the interest of the circle, and that the lessons are more
-carefully prepared. By request of the president, no text book is taken to
-any regular meeting of the circle. The teacher being the only one that
-has a text book, the attention of the class is secured, and more benefit
-is derived from the meetings in every way.”
-
-From Vermont two circles report, one from =Burlington=, with a membership
-of fifteen, and another from =Cambridge=.
-
-From =Windsor, Ct.=, they write us: “We have a circle here numbering
-about fifteen, and composed of the best talent our town can boast of.”
-And from =Deep River=, of the same state, the “Ivy Branch” of the C.
-L. S. C. is reported, “loyal and hopeful, with growing enthusiasm,
-attachments and interest.”
-
-One of the most thorough and practical methods of extending the
-influence of the C. L. S. C. is to bring it before the young people of
-high schools, who are just forming reading habits, and are particularly
-in need of being directed to the best books. The Pallas Circle, of
-=Wareham, Mass.=, have hit upon a splendid idea. Upon Longfellow’s Day
-they sent the following invitation to their exercises: “Compliments of
-the Pallas Circle, C. L. S. C., for Wednesday evening, February 27, to
-meet the graduating class of the Wareham High School.” Such an invitation
-would commend itself at once to the young people, and undoubtedly
-increase the circle.
-
-Two new circles, each of eighteen members, have reported from
-Massachusetts this month; one from =Jamaica Plains=, and another from
-=Haverhill=. Also from =Providence, R. I.=, the Whittier Circle has
-come to join the ranks. The wonderful growth of the class of ’87 in
-New England, is no doubt largely due to the energetic work of the
-organization which was made at Framingham last summer. The president
-of this New England branch of class ’87 informs us that he has ready
-for mailing a circular of suggestions, according to a vote taken at
-Framingham last summer. Any New England member of class ’87 who has not
-received a copy of the same, may apply to Rev. George Benedict, Hanson,
-Plymouth Co., Mass.
-
-From =New York City= we hear of a circle with a membership of fourteen
-young ladies, which has been in existence since October, 1882. It is
-known as the “Alden” local circle, and has as an emblem “the Pansy.”
-
-The C. L. S. C. Alumni, of =Pittsburgh, Pa.=, by its constitution,
-provides for three entertainments each year, viz.: A banquet for its
-members, a lecture, and a public meeting, the speakers being members of
-the Alumni. The first year’s course was a success in every particular,
-notably the lecture by Bishop Henry W. Warren, D. D., which was delivered
-to a very large and highly appreciative audience. Of this year the
-secretary writes: “So far we have been grandly successful, in spite
-of wind and storm. Such was the miserable weather of January that we
-were filled with fears for the success of Dr. Vincent’s lecture on the
-4th of February. As the day drew near, the weather became worse and
-worse. Pittsburgh, you know, has the reputation of getting up the most
-miserable weather on the continent, but this winter she has quite outdone
-her former self. The fourth could not have been more unpromising for
-an audience, the rivers being at flood height, and still raining and
-pouring. What was our surprise when we drove to the church to find an
-audience of five hundred or more, waiting for the distinguished lecturer.
-Such a surprise was magical in its effect upon the Doctor, for he
-lectured as he never lectured before—at least so thought his delighted
-audience. His theme was ‘Among the Heights.’ The lecture was not only a
-success, but a triumph, placing the lecturer in the front ranks of the
-giant minds now upon the platform the lecture field. Neither rain or
-howling storm can keep a Pittsburgh audience at home, when Rev. J. H.
-Vincent, D. D., is the lecturer.”
-
-On Sabbath, February 10, Dr. Vincent was in Washington, where the
-Chautauqua Vesper Services were held at his suggestion. They write us
-that as usual “he made many converts.”
-
-One of the members of the =Wheeling, W. Va.=, circle enthusiastically
-writes: “Our circle here has never been so large as it is this winter. We
-were so pleased with the work of last winter that we kept up our meetings
-all summer, studying American Literature. In this way we gained many new
-members.”
-
-Perhaps there is nowhere a circle more to be congratulated on its leader
-than the one at =Akron, O.= That the members heartily appreciate this,
-too, we can plainly tell from the report which we have lately received.
-The writer asks: “Have you heard with what success our circle in Akron
-is being conducted? Were we to tell you the name of our president, that
-would suffice any Chautauquan mind _why_ we succeed. The president
-of Chautauqua, Lewis Miller, is our president. What do we do at our
-meetings? There is no routine, but everything for variety and interest.
-One evening Dr. Vincent was with us and gave his grand lecture, ‘Parlor
-Talk.’ Mrs. Clement Smith, on ‘Literature and Reformation,’ occupied
-one evening. Two evenings were spent with stereopticon views (furnished
-by our president), the descriptions being given, and points of interest
-pointed out, and historical accounts given by a citizen who has traveled
-in Europe extensively. One evening was devoted entirely to Italy’s
-capital, St. Peter’s Church being described. Then one of our resident
-architects talked to us on ‘Architecture,’ with illustrations. Several
-evenings were given to literature. Our president is soon to give us a
-paper on ‘Political Economy.’”
-
-In a letter from an Illinois lady we find a most enthusiastic notice of
-the circle at =McLeansboro, Ill.= She says: “There may be larger and more
-intelligent circles, but I am sure none more enthusiastic.”
-
-In the City of =Eau Claire, Wisconsin=, there is a housekeepers’ circle,
-which has been named the “Alpha,” as three or four other classes have
-been organized in the city. It is composed entirely of busy housekeepers,
-who of all people, perhaps, find it the hardest work to control
-their time, but they write that for the sake of the inspiration and
-encouragement which they find their studies give to their daily duties,
-they are willing to make any sacrifice of pleasure or convenience.
-
-=Strawberry Point, Iowa=, has a circle of six members, which reports a
-growing appreciation of the course, and at =Humboldt, Iowa=, there is a
-circle which, though small, can claim a distinction which is certainly
-very rare: among its members are a little boy of ten years, and his
-grandmother, aged eighty.
-
-=Jefferson, Texas=, formed a C. L. S. C. class in 1880. An active
-membership of twenty is now in existence there, and the work is zealously
-done.
-
-It is impossible for us to insert all the reports which have reached us
-at this writing, but in order of date they will be used. We sometimes
-receive letters complaining that reports have been sent but not used.
-Every report sent to THE CHAUTAUQUAN will be used, but, of course, the
-first coming must be first served.
-
-The following circles were noticed in THE CHAUTAUQUAN for 1882-3, but not
-reported to the Plainfield office. No names being given, we have no means
-of reaching these circles, and will be very glad if any one will send the
-names of the officers for 1882-3 or 1883-4 to the office of the C. L. S.
-C., Plainfield, New Jersey: Clancey, Montana Territory; Flint, Michigan;
-Friendship, New York: Gloucester, Mass.; Ketchum, Idaho Territory; Little
-Prairie Ronde, Mich.; Muskegon, Mich.; Magnolia, Mass.; McKeesport,
-Pa.; Manston, Wis.; New Alexandria, Pa.; North Leeds, Wis.; Picton,
-Ont., Canada; Pana, Ill.; Portland, Conn.; Phillipsburg, Pa.; Portland,
-Oregon; Rockbottom, Mass.; Stroudsburg, Pa.; South Marshfield, Mass.;
-Springville, N. Y.; West Haverhill, Mass.; Westfield, Mass.
-
-The following have been reported to THE CHAUTAUQUAN _this_ year, 1883-4,
-but not to the Plainfield office: Baltimore, Md., “Eutaw Circle;”*
-Brazil, Ind., “Philomathean;” Elkhorn, Wis., “Mutual Improvement
-Society;”* Gillmor, Pa.; Greenville, S. C.; Imlay City, Mich.; La Crosse,
-Wis.; Milwaukee, Wis., “Bay View;”* Metropolis, Ill.; Memphis, Tenn.,
-“The Southern Circle;”* Mattoon, Ill.; New Bedford, Mass., “Philomaths;”*
-Picton, Ont., Canada; Osceola, Iowa, two circles; Ravenna, Ohio,
-“Royal;”* St. Charles, Iowa; Troy, N. Y., “Beman Park Circle;”* Vallejo,
-Cal.; West Brattleboro, Vermont, “Pansy;”* West Haverhill, Mass.; West
-Brattleboro, Vermont, “Vincent Circle;”* Wareham, Mass., “The Pallas
-Circle.”
-
-Circles from the places marked (*) have been reported, but not under the
-names given above, and as in some cases there are several circles in the
-same town we do not know to which the names belong.
-
-
-
-
-THE C. L. S. C. IN CANADA.
-
-
-We were much pleased to receive a full account of the C. L. S. C. work in
-=Canada=, from Mr. Lewis C. Peake, the secretary of the famous Toronto
-Central Circle. We feel quite sure that everyone will be glad to find
-full reports from Canada in this number. In no former year has so much
-interest been displayed in the work of the Circle north of the lakes as
-in the present, although so little has appeared in the columns of THE
-CHAUTAUQUAN. The Canadian edition of the _Popular Education Circular_
-was distributed lavishly in every province of the Dominion, and in
-Newfoundland and Bermuda, resulting in the enrollment of about five
-hundred members into the class of 1887. We have good reason also to know
-that there has been a corresponding development of interest on the part
-of members of the earlier classes. Without doubt the year 1883-4 may be
-regarded as one of healthy progress. This will, I think, be more apparent
-if the work done at a few points should be considered separately.
-
-At =Toronto= the Circle has acquired a firm footing. It has come to stay.
-The missionary work of last year has borne fruit in the formation of
-four new circles, three of them by distinct request, and as a result of
-meetings then held.
-
-The campaign for this season opened in September, when the writer
-delivered an address to the members of the Y. M. C. A., following it
-up by forming a circle there and then, composed of young men of the
-association. This circle has met regularly twice a month during the
-winter, and is doing its part in developing the literary side of the
-character of the members. Another circle has been formed at the West
-End Branch Y. M. C. A., which has displayed a large amount of zeal in
-the study. The other two circles were formed—one by Mr. J. L. Hughes,
-and the other without any outside help. There are two other circles,
-the Metropolitan, which retains its character of the banner circle, of
-whose members I hope to see a goodly number in the graduating class at
-Chautauqua next August, and the Erskine Church Circle, which has lately
-lost its beautiful home by fire. The Central Circle meetings have been
-regularly held each month under the presidency of Mr. E. Gurney, Jr., to
-whose efforts much of the success in Toronto is due, and both attendance
-and interest are on the increase, the numbers generally ranging from 150
-to 200 members and friends.
-
-The October meeting was a popular one, with addresses upon the general
-work by the Revs. G. M. Milligan, B.A., and B. D. Thomas, D.D., with the
-president. In November and December Mr. W. Houston, M.A., Librarian of
-the Provincial Legislature, treated the subject of Greek History in a
-most familiar and attractive manner. In our January meeting we had the
-rare treat of a lecture by Prof. Ramsey Wright, of Toronto University,
-on “Moulds and their allies,” a branch of vegetable biology which he
-illustrated by a series of fine diagrams. In February the circle was
-favored with one of the most useful and practical lectures of the entire
-series on “The growth of the New Testament,” by the Rev. G. Cochran, D.
-D., in which he traced the successive stages by which the books of the
-New Testament gradually grew into their present harmonious whole. Our
-March meeting was addressed by Mr. J. L. Hughes, public school inspector,
-upon the topic, “Physical Manhood,” on which subject the lecturer is
-exceptionally well qualified to discourse at any time. In addition to
-these special lectures, a Round-Table conference is held each evening,
-when subjects of practical importance are discussed and reports received
-from the several local circles. We find no difficulty now in securing
-the assistance of the very best men, specialists in their several
-departments. The age of suspicion has passed, and now the best people of
-all classes recognize the invaluable work of the Circle, and are ready
-to help it forward. Picton has one of the model circles, containing
-about thirty members, comprising some of the most intelligent and best
-educated persons in the town. The circle has grown gradually since 1880,
-and has been already represented at Chautauqua two seasons. One of the
-members, Miss Bristol, is the Canadian secretary of the Class of 1887.
-
-=Dundas.=—This circle is the result of a visit to Chautauqua last year by
-Rev. R. W. Woodsworth, the president, and is composed entirely of members
-of the Class of 1887, of whom I have bright hopes.
-
-=London.=—A large circle has been formed here in connection with the
-Y. M. C. A., with a membership of about forty of both sexes, nearly
-all of whom are members of the class of 1887. =Thorold= had the honor
-of furnishing two members of the graduating class of 1882. Until this
-year, however, no circle organization was effected, and even at the
-organization few fully grasped the real advantage to the town of this
-method of encouraging study. This ignorance is being gradually overcome
-with the expected results. Careful observation, with hints from THE
-CHAUTAUQUAN, are enabling the members to excite interest among those
-who yet remain outside. Milton and Longfellow days were successfully
-celebrated. This circle numbers thirty-five members, regular and local.
-The president expects that most of the cadets will next October be
-enrolled as full members. At the Provincial Sunday-school Convention,
-held last October in Cobourg, Mr. Hughes and the writer took the
-opportunity to bring the plan of the C. L. S. C. before the delegates,
-and many became interested in it, some of whom have since become members;
-among those was Dr. C. V. Emory, of =Galt=, who upon his return home,
-immediately set to work and organized a circle, which numbers sixteen
-full members, and gives promise that the number will soon be doubled.
-=Brantford= has a goodly number of members of the several classes.
-A circle of eleven members of the class of 1887 has been formed in
-connection with the Congregational Church, the pastor of which is
-president. The circle meets fortnightly at the residences of the members.
-
-=Montreal.=—Here, at last, the C. L. S. C. has taken root, and a live
-circle of fifty members has been formed, chiefly through the efforts of
-the Rev. Dr. Potts, who is its president. The course is much admired,
-and as the working of the circle is being better understood, and its
-objects grasped, many, at first only slightly interested, are becoming
-enthusiastic admirers of the scheme. In no place has the Circle obtained
-a more representative membership than here.
-
-=Halifax, N. S.=—A very promising circle has been formed in connection
-with the Grafton Street Methodist Church. Mr. C. H. Longard (1884), the
-president, says: “We are starting under very favorable auspices, and
-I feel sure it will prove to be a great success, both educational and
-social.” =Fredericton, N. B.=—Two circles meet here. Fredericton Circle
-No. 1, comprising sixteen members, meets weekly at the homes of the
-members, all of whom are very much interested in the work. Another circle
-composed wholly of new members has been formed, and arrangements are
-being made for monthly union meetings.
-
-=Carbonear, Newfoundland.=—Down here by the sea we have one member who
-remained for two years the solitary representative of the C. L. S. C.
-A circle has however been formed this year, consisting of eight full
-members, with a few local ones, and we confidently expect the circle to
-extend to other parts of the island, indeed the extension has already
-commenced.
-
-Other circles are in successful operation in =Orillia=, =Wyoming=,
-=Brampton=, =St. Thomas=, =Paisley=, =Lindray=, =Peterboro=,
-=Kemptville=, =Bedford=, =Lacolle=, =St. John, N. B.=, =Charlottetown=,
-and many other points, of which neither my time nor your space will
-permit me now to write. The few reports given above may be taken as
-representing the whole. Our Canadian people are not usually hasty in
-adopting new ideas, but when they have found a good thing they know how
-to appreciate it.
-
-
-
-
-QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS.
-
-ONE HUNDRED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON PICTURES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY—FROM
-COMMENCEMENT OF BOOK TO PAGE 145.
-
-By A. M. MARTIN, GENERAL SECRETARY C. L. S. C.
-
-
-1. Q. When and under whom was the first invasion of Great Britain made by
-the Romans? A. In 55 B. C., under Julius Cæsar.
-
-2. Q. How long afterward was Great Britain finally abandoned by the
-Romans? A. About five hundred years afterward.
-
-3. Q. Before this period what people from the east of the Mediterranean
-had traded with the islanders? A. The Phœnicians.
-
-4. Q. What was the character of the islanders when first known to the
-Phœnicians and Romans? A. They were savages, going almost naked, or only
-dressed in the rough skins of beasts, and staining their bodies with
-colored earths and the juices of plants.
-
-5. Q. Into how many tribes were the ancient Britons divided? A. Into
-thirty or forty tribes, each commanded by its own king, and were
-constantly fighting with one another.
-
-6. Q. What was the strange and terrible religion of the Britons called?
-A. The religion of the Druids.
-
-7. Q. What sacrifice is it certain that the Druidical ceremonies
-included? A. The sacrifice of human beings.
-
-8. Q. What did the Druids build? A. Great temples and altars open to the
-sky, fragments of some of which are yet remaining.
-
-9. Q. Which is the most extraordinary of these erections? A. Stonehenge,
-on Salisbury Plain, in Wiltshire.
-
-10. Q. What are the names of six prominent Romans that came to Britain
-during the Roman occupancy? A. Aulus Plautus, Suetonius, Agricola,
-Hadrian, Severus and Caracalla.
-
-11. Q. What are the names of three leaders of the Britons who opposed
-the efforts of the Romans in their efforts to subdue the islanders? A.
-Cassivellaunus, Caractacus, and Boadicea.
-
-12. Q. By whom was a wall built across the north of Britain, and for what
-purpose? A. First by the Emperor Hadrian, of earth, and afterward rebuilt
-of stone by the Emperor Severus, to protect Britain from the Picts and
-Scots.
-
-13. Q. After the departure of the Romans, from whom did the Britons ask
-help to repel the invasions of the Picts and Scots? A. The Angles and
-Saxons from North Germany.
-
-14. Q. After defeating the Picts and Scots what conquest did the Angles
-and Saxons then attempt? A. That of Britain itself.
-
-15. Q. What two brother chieftains were leaders of the early invasions of
-the Saxons? A. Hengist and Horsa.
-
-16. Q. What name is especially famous among those who resisted the
-Saxons? A. That of King Arthur.
-
-17. Q. What was the religion of the Saxon conquerors of Britain? A.
-Paganism.
-
-18. Q. About the year 600 A. D. who were sent by Pope Gregory to England
-as missionaries? A. St. Augustine and forty monks.
-
-19. Q. What Pagan king became a convert to the Christian faith, through
-the labors of these missionaries? A. Ethelbert, the king of Kent.
-
-20. Q. On the Christmas after the baptism of the king, how many of the
-people, is it related, followed his example? A. Ten thousand.
-
-21. Q. Who first united the seven Saxon kingdoms called the Heptarchy
-into one kingdom called England? A. Egbert of Essex, in 827.
-
-22. Q. How long did the Saxon line, beginning with Egbert, govern
-England? A. For 190 years.
-
-23. Q. Who was the most eminent among the kings of this line? A. Alfred
-the Great.
-
-24. Q. What enemy of England did King Alfred finally subdue? A. The Danes.
-
-25. Q. How did King Alfred attempt to improve the condition of the
-people? A. By wise laws, schools, and books, which he either translated,
-or caused to be translated, from Greek and Latin.
-
-26. Q. During the reign of Athelstane, grandson of Alfred the Great, what
-abbot obtained prominence, and was really the ruler of England during the
-continuance of the greater part of the Saxon line? A. Dunstan.
-
-27. Q. What line of kings succeeded the Saxon? A. The Danish line.
-
-28. Q. How long did the Danish line hold control? A. Twenty-four years.
-
-29. Q. What three kings reigned during the continuance of the Danish
-line? A. Canute, and his two sons, Harold Harefoot and Hardicanute.
-
-30. Q. After the death of Hardicanute, for how long a time Was the Saxon
-line restored? A. Twenty-five years.
-
-31. Q. What conquest of England was made in 1066? A. The Norman conquest,
-by William the Conqueror.
-
-32. Q. By what great battle was the contest between the Normans and the
-Saxons for the possession of England decided? A. The battle of Hastings,
-October 14, 1066.
-
-33. Q. What does Lord Macaulay say in regard to this Norman conquest? A.
-The subjugation of a nation by a nation has seldom, even in Asia, been
-more complete.
-
-34. Q. How did William divide the land of conquered England? A. In fiefs
-among his barons, and gave all chief places in church and government to
-foreigners.
-
-35. Q. Who succeeded William the Conqueror to the throne of England? A.
-His second son, William Rufus.
-
-36. Q. What was the most remarkable event during his reign? A. The first
-Crusade.
-
-37. Q. What zealous missionary went through Italy and France preaching
-the Crusade? A. Peter the Hermit.
-
-38. Q. What action did Pope Urban II. take in regard to the Crusade? A.
-From a lofty scaffold in the market place of Clermont he preached the
-Crusade to assembled thousands.
-
-39. Q. Under what leaders, and to what number, did the first body of
-Crusaders set out for the Holy Land? A. One hundred thousand under the
-leadership of Peter the Hermit and Walter the Penniless.
-
-40. Q. What became of the remnant of this number that reached the Asiatic
-side of the Bosphorus? A. They were finally routed and cut to pieces by
-the Turks.
-
-41. Q. Under what commander did the regular army of the Crusaders at
-length approach Asia? A. Godfrey of Bouillon, Hugh of Vermandois,
-Robert of Normandy, Robert of Flanders, Stephen of Chartres, Raymond of
-Toulouse, Bohemond, and Tancred.
-
-42. Q. How long was it after Pope Urban had preached the Crusade at
-Clermont that Jerusalem fell, the Holy Sepulcher was free? A. More than
-three years.
-
-43. Q. What does Charles Knight say was the tendency of the Crusades? A.
-To elevate the character of European life, and to prepare the way for the
-ultimate triumph of mental freedom and equal government.
-
-44. Q. Who ascended the throne as successor of William Rufus in the year
-1100? A. His brother, Henry I.
-
-45. Q. To whom did Henry will the crown? A. His daughter, Matilda.
-
-46. Q. Upon the death of Henry who attempted to seize upon the throne? A.
-Stephen, a grandson of William the Conqueror.
-
-47. Q. To what did this lead? A. To civil wars between the adherents of
-Matilda and Stephen.
-
-48. Q. After ten years of civil warfare what was the result of the
-contest? A. Matilda fled to the continent and Stephen was acknowledged
-king.
-
-49. Q. With the death of Stephen what line ceased to hold the crown? A.
-The Norman line.
-
-50. Q. Who was the successor of Stephen? A. Henry II., the son of Matilda.
-
-51. Q. Of what line was he the first sovereign? A. The Plantagenet line.
-
-52. Q. How long did the Plantagenet line continue to hold the crown? A.
-Two hundred and forty-five years.
-
-53. Q. Whom did Henry make Archbishop of Canterbury? A. Thomas à Becket.
-
-54. Q. Concerning what did the king and Archbishop Becket have a
-prolonged contention? A. Concerning church and state authority.
-
-55. Q. How was this contention ended? A. By the assassination of Becket
-at the altar of his own cathedral.
-
-56. Q. What did Henry do to divert public attention from himself as
-instigator of the assassination of Becket? A. He underwent penance and
-was scourged at the tomb of Becket.
-
-57. Q. Who was the successor of Henry II.? A. Richard I., called Richard
-Cœur de Lion.
-
-58. Q. Soon after his accession to the throne in what enterprise did
-Richard take part? A. The Crusades.
-
-59. Q. With what other prominent leaders was Richard accompanied on the
-third Crusade? A. Philip of France, and the Duke of Austria.
-
-60. Q. What mediæval institution was at its height during the reign of
-Richard? A. Chivalry.
-
-61. Q. Who succeeded Richard to the throne? A. His brother John.
-
-62. Q. What two men were at this time prominent in their efforts to
-establish the fact that a king should rule in England by law instead of
-by force, or rule not at all? A. Stephen Langton, the Archbishop, and
-William, Earl of Pembroke.
-
-63. Q. What great document regarded as the foundation of English liberty
-did the barons force John to sign? A. Magna Charta.
-
-64. Q. When and where was Magna Charta signed? A. At Runnymede in 1215.
-
-65. Q. What was the result of John’s contentions with the Pope? A. His
-kingdom was laid under an interdict, and John himself was excommunicated.
-
-66. Q. What invasion of England was attempted during the reign of John?
-A. A French invasion, at the instance of the Pope, to dethrone John the
-king.
-
-67. Q. What put an end to the French invasion? A. The sudden death of
-John.
-
-68. Q. Who succeeded him on the throne? A. His son, Henry III.
-
-69. Q. Who was the great leader of the barons during the reign of Henry
-III.? A. Earl Simon de Montfort.
-
-70. Q. What was the result of an encounter between the king’s forces and
-the barons at Lewes? A. The barons were victorious, and the king, and his
-son Prince Edward, were taken prisoners.
-
-71. Q. For what was the parliament summoned by Earl Simon noted? A. As
-being the first one in which the citizens had part as well as the nobles
-and bishops.
-
-72. Q. In what battle were the forces of Montfort signally defeated and
-the Earl slain? A. The battle of Evesham.
-
-73. Q. Who succeeded Henry III. to the crown? A. His son, Edward I.
-
-74. Q. What part was conquered and annexed to England during his reign?
-A. Wales.
-
-75. Q. What title was given to the oldest son of king Edward which has
-since been retained by the oldest son of the reigning sovereign? A. The
-Prince of Wales.
-
-76. Q. In the midst of what attempted conquest did king Edward die? A.
-The attempted conquest of Scotland.
-
-77. Q. Who succeeded Edward I. to the throne? A. His son, Edward II.
-
-78. Q. Who was the leader of the Scots? A. Robert Bruce.
-
-79. Q. How did the attempt of Edward II. to complete the conquest of
-Scotland result? A. He was overwhelmingly defeated at the battle of
-Bannockburn, and abandoned the enterprise.
-
-80. Q. By what right did Edward III., the successor of Edward II., make
-claim to the French crown? A. The right of his mother, a sister to the
-deceased king of France, there being no surviving male descendant in the
-direct line.
-
-81. Q. Of what was this the beginning? A. The Hundred Years’ War between
-England and France.
-
-82. Q. In what battle did Edward gain a decisive victory over the French?
-A. The battle of Cressy.
-
-83. Q. What son of the king greatly distinguished himself in this battle?
-A. His oldest son, a youth of sixteen, known as the Black Prince.
-
-84. Q. With what did King Edward follow up this victory? A. The siege and
-capture of Calais.
-
-85. Q. In what other battle did the French suffer a memorable defeat at
-the hands of the English during the reign of Edward III.? A. The battle
-of Poitiers.
-
-86. Q. Who were taken prisoners by the Black Prince at this battle? A.
-The French king John and his son.
-
-87. Q. Who succeeded Edward III. on the throne? A. His grandson, Richard
-II.
-
-88. Q. What rising of the people took place in the early part of his
-reign? A. The peasant revolt.
-
-89. Q. Who was the leader of the peasants in this revolt? A. Wat Tyler.
-
-90. Q. How was the revolt ended? A. By the death of Tyler and the promise
-of the king to grant what the peasants asked.
-
-91. Q. By whom was Richard dethroned? A. By his uncle Henry of Lancaster,
-or Henry IV.
-
-92. Q. What line ended with the dethronement of Richard II.? A. The
-Plantagenet line.
-
-93. Q. What House began to reign with the accession of Henry IV.? A. The
-House of Lancaster.
-
-94. Q. How long did the House of Lancaster continue to hold the throne,
-and what sovereigns reigned during the time? A. It continued sixty-two
-years, embracing the reigns of the three Henries, IV., V. and VI.
-
-95. Q. During the reigns of Henry IV. and Henry V. the members of
-what religious sect were persecuted with great vindictiveness? A. The
-Lollards, several being burned at the stake.
-
-96. Q. What prominent supporter of the Lollards was made a victim of this
-persecution? A. Sir John Oldcastle, called Lord Cobham.
-
-97. Q. What invasion did Henry V. renew? A. The invasion of France.
-
-98. Q. What noted battle was fought in France during this invasion? A.
-The battle of Agincourt.
-
-99. Q. What was the result of this battle? A. The complete defeat of the
-French.
-
-100. Q. What were the important features of the treaty of Troyes that
-followed? A. The French king acknowledged Henry as heir in succession to
-the French crown, and gave him his daughter in marriage.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Good health is a great pre-requisite of successful or happy living. To
-live worthily or happily, to accomplish much for one’s self or others,
-when suffering from pain and disease, is attended with difficulty. Dr.
-Johnson used to say that “Every man is a rascal when he is sick.” And
-very much of the peevishness, irritability, capriciousness and impatience
-seen in men and women has its root in bodily illness. The very morals
-suffer from disease of the body.—_Mary A. Livermore._
-
-
-
-
-CHAUTAUQUA NORMAL COURSE.
-
-Season of 1884.
-
-
-LESSON IX.—BIBLE SECTION.
-
-_The House of the Lord._
-
-By REV. J. L. HURLBUT, D.D., AND R. S. HOLMES, A.M.
-
-The Temple on Mount Moriah was the result of long growth. 1. It began
-with _the Altar_, erected of loose stones wherever the patriarchs
-journeyed, and bearing its bloody sacrifice as a prefiguration of Christ.
-2. Next came _the Tabernacle_, a movable tent, designed for a nomadic
-people, and symbolizing God’s dwelling-place among his people. 3. When
-the Tabernacle was fixed at Shiloh, a more substantial structure, by
-degrees, took the place of the tent, surrounded by rooms in which the
-priests lived, and standing in an open court. 4. This, in the age of
-David and Solomon, furnished the ground plan for the Temple on Mount
-Moriah.
-
-There were three temples. 1. _Solomon’s Temple_, dedicated 1000 B. C.,
-and destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar, 587 B. C. 2. _Zerubbabel’s Temple_,
-begun by the Jews on the return from captivity, B. C. 536, and completed
-in 20 years. 3. _Herod’s Temple_, begun 30 B. C., as the second temple
-was in a ruinous condition, but not fully completed until 65 A. D., five
-years before its final destruction by Titus. The latter is the one to be
-briefly described in this lesson. It consisted of several courts and an
-interior building. The dimensions named below are not precise, as the
-length of the cubit and the thickness of the walls are uncertain.
-
-I. _The Court of the Gentiles_ was an open plaza, or quadrangle, not
-square, but of about 1000 feet on each side. It was surrounded by a
-high wall, and entered by six gates, of which three were on the west,
-toward the city, and one on each of the other sides. On the eastern side
-extended a double colonnade, Solomon’s Porch, and on the south another,
-Herod’s Porch. As this was not regarded a sacred place, it was considered
-no sacrilege to have a _market_ upon its marble floor, especially for the
-sale of animals for sacrifice.
-
-II. On the northwestern part of the Court was the _chel_, or sacred
-enclosure, a raised platform 8 feet high, surrounded by a fence, within
-which no Gentile could enter. Its outer dimensions were about 630 by 300
-feet. It was entered by nine gates, four each on the north and south, and
-one on the east. Upon the platform of the chel rose an inner wall 40 feet
-high and 600 by 250 feet in dimensions.
-
-III. The space enclosed by this lofty inner wall was divided into two
-sections, of which the eastern was a square of about 230 feet, called the
-_Court of the Women_, on account of a gallery for women around it. It had
-four gates, of which the one on the east was probably the Gate Beautiful.
-In its four corners were rooms, used for different purposes connected
-with the services; and upon its walls were boxes for the gifts of the
-worshipers, from which it was often called “the Treasury.”
-
-IV. _The Court of Israel_ occupied the western part of the enclosure,
-and was about 320 by 230 feet in size. Another court stood inside of it,
-so that it was simply a narrow platform 16 feet wide, from which male
-worshipers could view the sacrifices. In the southeastern corner was the
-hall in which the Sanhedrim met, and where Stephen stood on trial. In the
-wall around this court were rooms used for storage, for baking bread, for
-treasuries, etc. This court was entered by seven gates, on the north and
-south each three, and one on the east.
-
-V. _The Court of the Priests_ was a raised platform inside the Court of
-Israel, and separated from it by a low rail. It was 275 by 200 feet in
-size. Upon it stood the altar, the laver, and the Temple building.
-
-VI. _The Temple_ itself was the only covered building on the mountain. It
-consisted of a lofty vestibule, having a front 120 feet high; a series
-of rooms three stories high for the priests, and within these the house
-of God, divided into two rooms, the Holy Place and the Holy of Holies,
-separated by a veil. The outer room was 30 by 60 feet in size, the inner
-30 feet square and of the same height. In the Holy Place stood the table
-for the show-bread, the golden candlestick (properly a lamp-stand), and
-the golden altar of incense. In the Holy of Holies there was no ark in
-the New Testament period, but only a stone upon which the high-priest
-laid the censer when he entered the room, on but one day in the year, the
-great Day of Atonement.
-
-Notice, that each department of the Temple stood at a different
-elevation. Thus the platform of the chel was 8 feet above the pavement of
-the Gentile’s Court; the floor of the Women’s Court was 3 feet higher;
-that of the Court of Israel was 10 feet higher still; the Court of the
-Priests 3 feet above that of Israel; and the floor of the house was 8
-feet above the Court of the Priests. Thus there was a constant ascent to
-the one entering the Temple.
-
-
-SUNDAY-SCHOOL SECTION.
-
-LESSON IX.—THE TEACHING PROCESS.—ATTENTION.
-
-_Attention._—This is a Latin word of very decisive meaning; “a
-stretching of something toward something.” A bow strained is a literal
-illustration. In common acceptation it is limited to mental conditions.
-The dictionaries define it as “a steady exertion of the mind.”
-Without attention there can be no teaching. In Sunday-school teaching
-the _something stretched_ must be the pupil’s mind; the _objective
-something_, the truth to be taught.
-
-There are two kinds of attention: (1) Voluntary, and (2) Involuntary.
-Voluntary attention is born of ignorance and of desire to know, and
-places confidence in the power of the person to whom it yields itself to
-satisfy that desire.
-
-Illustration: My little child sees my hand upon the door-knob; sees the
-door open, and my egress. Next day, pursuing his desire, his hand seeks
-the knob, but the door does not open. He comes to me with his difficulty.
-I slowly turn the knob. He watches. He gives attention. It was born of
-ignorance; of desire to know; and of confidence in me. It was voluntary;
-and it will end when the necessity for it ends.
-
-2. Involuntary attention. This is of two kinds—(1) _Compelled_; (2)
-_Won_. The galley slave under a master’s eye illustrates the first.
-Another is furnished by a violin string, when strained. It is attent,
-it answers the thought in the soul of the musician who draws the bow
-upon it. But the bow was resined and the string strained by the artist’s
-hand. He created the attention. It was involuntary; nay, more; it was
-compelled. Such attention ends when the compulsion ends. I do not want
-such from my pupils.
-
-2. That which is won; and which involuntary at first soon becomes
-voluntary. This is the attention which results in teaching and learning.
-
-The duration of attention, voluntary or involuntary, must always depend
-on certain conditions:
-
-1. Conditions of Circumstance. (_a_) The place must be suitable; (_b_)
-the time must be opportune; (_c_) the ventilation good; (_d_) the
-temperature agreeable. These are necessary elements in the effort of
-holding attention. But though these things be all unfavorable, their
-disadvantages may be overcome, if there is no lack in the second class of
-conditions, namely:
-
-2. Conditions of Personality. By this I mean my personality as teacher.
-These conditions are (_a_) that of attractive power that will draw the
-pupil toward me; (_b_) that of magnetism that will hold the pupil fast to
-me; (_c_) that of enthusiasm that will fire my pupil with zeal for work;
-(_d_) that of self-withdrawal; (_e_) that which transfers attention from
-myself to my subject. If I have these personal elements in my teaching, I
-shall get attention and hold it. If I have not, I must cultivate them.
-
-3. Conditions of Knowledge. These are three. I must know _my subject_,
-_myself_, and _my pupil_. A knowledge of the subject, involves a
-knowledge of methods. And here is the critical test with a teacher.
-
-Notice some of the methods essential: (_a_) The use of illustrations
-apt and interesting; (_b_) the use of questions full of surprises and
-wise devices; (_c_) the use of elliptical readings between teacher and
-pupil; (_d_) the use of concert recitations in low tones by pupils; (_e_)
-the use of inter-questions, each pupil asking a question in turn of his
-fellow-pupil, and each also of the teacher; (_f_) the use of pictures,
-maps, and objects.
-
-
-
-
-EDITOR’S OUTLOOK.
-
-
-TWO KINDS OF LAWLESSNESS.
-
-A mob in Cincinnati, involving the loss of many lives and much property
-in a three days’ reign of terror, has added another to a long list
-of warnings that the criminal administration of this country needs a
-thorough-going reform. The popular indignation which expressed itself
-at Cincinnati has been growing slowly into steady strength for thirty
-years and more. About 1845, gangs of horse thieves in northern Illinois
-were broken up—the law having failed—by regulators composed of the best
-citizens, who summarily hanged the thieves. About ten years later this
-history was repeated in Cedar and Linn counties, Iowa. These are two
-incidents among many of like type. Most readers know the history of the
-vigilance committee in San Francisco. The criminal administration having
-utterly failed, the best citizens organized themselves outside of the
-law and by vigorous and summary punishment restored the supremacy of the
-law. The mobbing of the “Dukes jury” at Uniontown is a still fresh event.
-In New York City, a few years ago, a citizen was brutally murdered in a
-public place, and the murderer, when arrested, said: “Hanging is played
-out.” The remark roused public feeling and refreshed the courage of
-the courts so that for some time hanging became the certain punishment
-of wilful murder. But in New York City, it is the press which really
-administers criminal law—by compelling the courts to do their duty. In
-the Cincinnati case, the last of a series of miscarriages of justice was
-the convicting of manslaughter in a case where wilful and mean-motived
-murder had been proved. The judge commented harshly upon the verdict. A
-public meeting listened to appropriately animated addresses, and passed
-strong resolutions of condemnation of the jury in that case, and of
-the criminal administration of the city. The excitable elements of the
-audience broke up there to reorganize in an assault on the jail. They
-were joined by a baser element, and a reign of terror followed.
-
-The criminal system of the entire country is defective. It is not a
-terror to evil-doers. It tortures the conscience and the self respect of
-honest men. It has rendered human life much more insecure than private
-property. It is on the average safer to kill a man after robbing him than
-to rob him only. The match that lighted the Cincinnati conflagration was
-a murder done for the sake of robbery, and punished as if it had been
-robbery.
-
-Our evils in this branch of justice are several distinct fungus growths
-of demoralized customs. A murder trial seldom ends within a year of the
-discovery of the criminal; it often ends twice as long after the arrest
-of the murderer. In England, three months suffices for the same work.
-There is no civilized country except our own where these long delays
-are tolerated. This is the safest country in the world for a murderer
-to carry on his profession. He is less likely to be arrested; he is not
-tried until the general public has forgotten his crime. When he comes
-to the dock, _if he has money_, or friends possessed of money, he can
-buy out the law by employing some member of a class of lawyers who
-make a profitable industry of defeating the aims of public justice. In
-the Cincinnati case, the judge said, courageously, that the murderer
-had been cleared of that crime because _his friends had six or seven
-thousand dollars to fee criminal lawyers with_. It is almost a rule
-that if the murderer has money, his cunning lawyers will delay trial,
-destroy testimony, and confuse the jury, or bribe the jury. If these
-fail, and there is money left, motions for new trials will be pressed
-upon judges, and perhaps secured by fictitious testimony. The motto of a
-murderer may well be: “While there is money there is hope.” It is plain
-to all intelligent persons that the law’s delay, under the influence of
-money, has become intolerable. We do hang the poor; we seldom hang the
-men who can command money. There ought to be a more summary procedure.
-There ought to be more pure discretion—unhampered by precedent—vested
-in judges. These interminable delays ought to be impossible without the
-connivance of the judges.
-
-The power of money in criminal trials is a feature of the jury system
-_as we manage it_. In some states a man who knows what is going on in
-the world about him can not be admitted to serve on a jury. He has heard
-of the case and formed an opinion. Every intelligent man does that in
-a case of murder. This leaves jury duty to professional jurors, and to
-the least intelligent citizens. Worse still, on the plea of business
-duties intelligent men evade service on juries. In New York City, last
-year, a ring of “jury fixers” was discovered. They had hundreds, probably
-thousands, of customers—consisting of business men—who paid from ten
-to fifty dollars a year to have “things fixed” so that they should not
-be called on jury service. The men who thus bought themselves off from
-a civil duty were so numerous that even the press evaded the duty of
-vigorously exposing the crime. The men who are left, in large cities, to
-serve on juries, are men whose judgments can be involved in confusion
-by an artful plea; often, too, their verdicts can be bought with money.
-The city demoralization is gradually extending to the country. _We
-must reform._ We are nearing the end of popular patience. People begin
-to demand that they shall not be murdered with impunity. Get better
-juries; or amend the constitution and abolish juries. Give judges more
-power over the criminal lawyers, and more real discretion in refusing
-delays that defeat the ends of justice. Give judges to understand that
-we want more speedy trials and more direct methods of trial. Ask for
-reform—imperatively, emphatically—and reform will come. The lawlessness
-of court proceedings keeps within the forms of law; but it has become an
-ally of that other lawlessness which murders men, women and children—and
-gives its ally comparative impunity.
-
-
-THE REWARDS OF PUBLIC SERVICE.
-
-There is a large amount of well-founded distrust of the tendencies of
-our public life. It is not a distrust of Republican principles, or of
-universal suffrage, or of popular influence on government. It centers
-in our public service, and relates exclusively to the political paths
-to office, the uncertain or inadequate rewards for service, and the
-speculative element in the tenure of office. Are we not on a road which
-leads to demoralization in the civil service? The civil service law
-applies only to a small part of the public field. Cabinet officers, heads
-of departments, custom house and internal revenue officers, and all
-judicial officers, are outside of that law, not to forget the entire body
-of law makers. If we ask ourselves what first-class ability is worth,
-we find the railroads, banks and other corporations paying an average
-of twice (or more) as much as the government pays legislators, judges,
-cabinet officers, and heads of departments. If we compare what is needed
-by corporations with what is needed by the government, we shall be slow
-to admit that the public service can be satisfied with inferior ability.
-If we look at the cost of holding an office, we discover that a bank
-president may live where and in such style as he pleases, but a cabinet
-officer must live in Washington, and _ought_ to spend more than we pay
-him in acquitting himself of social obligations.
-
-The editor of THE CHAUTAUQUAN recently attended a party in the house
-of Secretary Chandler, the cost of which could not have been less than
-a thousand dollars; and there was no ostentation; only the reasonable
-social demand was met. Of course Secretary Chandler can not give such
-parties out of his salary, and could not meet the social demand upon his
-official position, if he had not a private fortune. The incident points
-to the suspicion that we are rapidly advancing to a condition of things
-under which poor men can not hold high offices. Everywhere the public
-officers of the classes which we have named are under special social
-obligations which exceed in money-cost the amount of their salaries.
-There is a double tendency—on two parallel lines—to exclude honest poor
-men, and to take in an inferior class of men who are either rich or
-unscrupulous. There is no reasonable doubt that the United States Senate
-has seriously deteriorated through the tendencies just mentioned. Every
-one knows that so many members of the other House are habitually absent,
-that a political battle has to be advertised to collect the members of
-the majority for the time being. The men in this case may or may not be
-inferior, but they are certainly rendering an inferior service—doing
-their own work while in the pay of the people. The other work is a
-growing factor. Senators live by their practice in the Supreme Court or
-by their services to corporations in which they hold office; this private
-work too often coming into collision with public interests.
-
-The subject is so large that we can barely hint at points. Here is a man
-climbing to public place through a political combination which taxes him
-at every step. He must have money, or borrow or steal money, to make the
-ascent. When he reaches the place, he is paid a salary so far below the
-demands of his office that if he is to meet his social obligations he
-must have an income beyond his salary, and this income he must earn as he
-can if he is not wealthy. And the real evil is still farther on: if he
-wishes to stay in public life he must pay tribute to political sponges;
-for the tenure of his office is so short that he must begin to provide
-for the next election as soon as the first is over. If he wishes to
-rise, he must pay, and keep on paying to the invisible army of political
-tax-collectors which lines, many ranks deep, every road that leads to
-an office. Rare and favored men escape these evils; but the majority of
-public men encounter them. To crown the edifice of bad policy, partisan
-rules are set up which limit time of service. Two terms, for example, is
-the limit for service in the lower House of Congress, in many districts.
-That is to say, your Congressman is advised at the outset that he must
-retire in four years. What motive has he for qualifying himself to be a
-good legislator? He naturally seeks an office under the government, and
-gives his brain power to that pursuit. But wherever he is—unless he hold
-a judicial office—he is menaced by the rule of rotation in office. We
-have been remarkably fortunate in the judicial service through the fact
-that, though the salaries are niggardly, the terms of service are long,
-and safe from partisan influences.
-
-We might profitably reflect on foreign comparisons. In Italy men
-receiving from $300 to $600 in bureaus serve for life, and have certain
-promotion. It is not a perfect method, but under it the government
-service is honorable to an extent which amazes an American. The honor is
-the largest item of the pay. We pay a less and less measure of honor.
-The path to our service grows more filthy, and the man who has reached
-the goal is often soiled with the filth through which he has waded—often
-enough to discredit, insensibly but surely, the class which he has
-joined. We pay too little in money; we pay too little in honor; we cheat
-ourselves and demoralize our public servants by befouling the ladders
-on which they climb, and by making their ascent as uncertain, and their
-hold on any round of the ladder as precarious, as possible. A large moral
-lies in the contrast that a bank cashier is discriminatingly chosen for
-ability, has no election expenses, is secure in his office, owes no
-social duties to the bank, and may rise to the presidency of it. It is
-the same in other corporations. As employers, the corporations have more
-soul and more sense than the people of the United States.
-
-
-DOCTOR NEWMAN’S NEW IDEA.
-
-The disturbance of Christian peace which has for some months affected
-the Madison Avenue Congregational Church, New York, has impressed us as
-disclosing a new phase of inter-church life. To an onlooker the case—the
-very heart of the case—is a struggle of a pastor to maintain himself in
-full membership with two denominations, against a struggle of men in both
-denominations to shut him out of one or the other denomination. This
-is the novelty in this New York “church quarrel.” For our part we are
-disposed to ask what general principle of morals, equity or discipline
-is violated by the Rev. Dr. John P. Newman’s position? He claims to be
-the permanent pastor of a Congregational church while retaining his
-membership in the Methodist Episcopal Church. Why not? It surely is
-not an axiom that a man can not belong to two denominations. Dialectic
-theologians may invent a score of arguments, but they will find their
-best one in the fact that the practice has been to confine a Christian’s
-membership to one branch of the church. But in the advance to Christian
-unity we have rapidly changed the practice at several points; and it is
-quite possible that Dr. Newman’s “new departure” may be another march on
-the general line of our progress.
-
-A few words respecting the Madison Avenue Church and its pastor will
-help our readers to understand the case. The church was founded a dozen
-or more years ago by Dr. Hepworth, who up to about that time had been a
-Unitarian clergyman. It was a very expensive enterprise, and Dr. Hepworth
-became satisfied, after a few years, that he could neither fill the
-church with an audience nor pay its debt. Dr. W. R. Davis, who had been a
-Methodist clergyman, and is now a Dutch Reformed pastor in Albany, N. Y.,
-succeeded Dr. Hepworth, and, after a few years of experience like that of
-his predecessor, hunted up a successor in the person of Dr. Newman, and
-resigned. There were two distinct difficulties in both these pastorates.
-One was the large debt; the other was the failure to secure adequate
-audiences. The last difficulty suggests no fault in either of the
-pastors. Both were gifted and popular. But the church is surrounded by
-other churches, and only an extraordinary man can secure a large body of
-hearers in it. The church was not at fault for not paying its debt; the
-burden was beyond its strength. When it asked Dr. Newman to become its
-pastor, it asked him for two reasons: He had friends who could pay the
-debt, and he would bring these friends into the church and congregation;
-and it was well understood that he could fill the large house with
-hearers.
-
-Rev. Dr. John P. Newman has a national reputation as a pulpit orator.
-He always has full houses where he statedly preaches. Among his friends
-he numbers General Grant, whose pastor he was in Washington in the days
-of Grant’s presidency. The ex-president is one of the men whom Dr.
-Newman took into the Madison Avenue congregation and made a trustee of
-the church property. Dr. Newman is one of the last of the classical
-pulpit orators. His style is stately, his presence majestic. Pure taste
-and high ideals characterize his thought. His noble person, his rich,
-smooth voice, and the elevation of his thought conspire to make him
-admired and reverenced in the pulpit. His ardent friends have called
-him “the Chrysostom of his age.” Not unnaturally, he has expected the
-highest places in Methodism. Neither Webster nor Clay became President
-of the United States—and John P. Newman did not become a bishop. Some
-difficulties arose respecting a place for him in New York three years
-ago, he having then finished his term as pastor of the Central Methodist
-Church. After a year of decorous waiting, he accepted the call to the
-Madison Avenue Church. There are controversies about sundry minor
-matters; but after painfully laboring through the documents, we find two
-clear facts: 1st. From the start Dr. Newman has clung to the idea of
-remaining a Methodist while becoming a Congregationalist; 2d, there is
-an abundant lack of proof that in this policy he has deceived any one
-or done any other act which is inconsistent with the character which
-he displays in the pulpit. A single sentence in his address before the
-council was out of place; but, even it, from his point of view, had great
-provocation. To the onlooking public, perhaps to Dr. Newman also, it
-was a surprise to see the editor of the _Christian Advocate_ furnishing
-material for use against Dr. Newman. This new party to the controversy
-presents the Methodists as semi-officially engaged in the effort to crowd
-Dr. Newman from his attitude as holding positions in two denominations.
-The justification of the editor of the _Christian Advocate_ can not rest
-on any special pleading; it must rest on the ground that Dr. Newman’s
-claim is a bad one in church moralities. If this be true, then his
-Methodist antagonist has discharged a disagreeable duty and “meddled” for
-a dignified purpose.
-
-The church quarrel did not originate in the new position of Dr. Newman,
-but the conflict having begun, this new position was made the point of
-attack by what is called the “Anti-Newman party.” It was the weak place
-because Dr. Newman had taken a new departure. The quarrel came out of the
-incompatibility of temper and interest developed between the old and the
-new elements in the church and congregation. Some of the old men left;
-the new were then more numerous and powerful than the old. The latter saw
-themselves gradually retiring to back seats, while the new men filled the
-front seats. They precipitated a conflict to secure themselves against
-the consequences of Dr. Newman’s abundant success. In the wisdom of this
-world, the new element put off paying the large debt; but they preferred
-to be certain that they would be left in peaceable possession after
-paying the debt.
-
-The council has “advised” that Dr. Newman is in an untenable position—is
-not the permanent pastor. The advice is probably according to precedent.
-But it was not according to precedent that Dr. Hepworth left the
-Unitarians, and Dr. Davis the Methodists, to become pastor of that
-church. And for forty years there has been an increasing interflow
-between denominations. Half a score of ex-Methodists, including some
-of the ablest pastors in the city, are preaching in churches of
-other denominations. Ministers and members pass and repass between
-denominations. All this would have looked strange forty years ago.
-Perhaps Dr. Newman’s new idea may not look strange forty years hence.
-The advice of the council has probably only changed the form of the
-conflict which does not depend on Dr. Newman, but on the antagonism of
-the old and new elements in the congregation. We should like to see Dr.
-Newman’s theory thoroughly tested, and Congregationalism is liberal
-enough to afford the desired test. Methodism, as a whole, has no reason
-for jealousy of Dr. Newman’s success in the Madison Avenue Church. His
-success and good fame reflect honor on all Methodist preachers. We may
-come to realize that if a man is “worthy of confidence and fellowship by
-virtue of his responsible connection with some other body of Christian
-churches”—words quoted by the late council—he may safely “be counted a
-minister of the Congregational,” or any other “order.”
-
-
-SUPERFLUOUS KNOWLEDGE.
-
-A writer in _Cornhill Magazine_, some years ago, facetiously suggested
-that, while societies for the acquisition of useful knowledge abounded,
-each, doubtless, in its way, proving of eminent service to mankind,
-another society, not so much as a direct opponent, but rather as
-a proper, and even necessary, corrective of its rivals, should be
-organized, the object of which should be to sift out and to suppress the
-vast and ever increasing accumulations of knowledge that are not only
-really worthless but which are an unmitigated nuisance, a useless burden,
-a confused and baffling heap.
-
-The suggestion above referred to, made perhaps in jest, is one, we
-venture to suggest, which might well be made in earnest. Useless
-knowledge! Has it never occurred to the reader what areas, and even
-continents, not to say oceans of valueless, of absolutely superfluous
-knowledge there are in the world? Observe we are not now writing of
-literature, or books, merely; we say knowledge.
-
-Useless knowledge! For everything that may, with any kind of propriety,
-be comprehended under this honored term, knowledge, we usually cherish a
-profound and reverent respect. The highest conception of scholarship, on
-the part of many, consists in being possessed of encyclopedic information
-concerning the details of almost every conceivable matter.
-
-According to this idea learning consists in an intimate acquaintance,
-at once and quite indiscriminately, with all the results of the latest
-scientific research, the facts of universal history, the mysteries of
-theology and subtleties of metaphysics; with all the institutes of law
-and politics; with all the literature of poetry and art.
-
-To one entertaining such an idea of scholarship as this how positively
-depressing must be the monstrous and obviously ever-accumulating mass
-of facts heaping up around him. He quite envies the great men of the
-olden time who, in consequence of the then comparatively narrow range of
-knowledge, found it not impracticable to maintain a creditable standing
-at once as statesmen, soldiers, poets, philosophers, and artists; while
-he, in his day, can serve, at best, only as an infinitesimal wheel in a
-machinery of boundless complication.
-
-Even were it desirable to burden the mind with boundless mental
-acquisitions, one certainly has not long to live to discover the utter
-futility of even the most capacious memory ever being able to compass
-any such result—to learn that the human mind, whatever its capabilities,
-is yet finite; that it is, therefore, the part of wisdom to select some
-one department of study and devote one’s energies mainly to the mastery
-of the same; and that, finally, one essential condition of usefulness
-depends on one’s thus wisely restricting himself to a comparatively
-narrow and limited field of inquiry and of attainment.
-
-In the meantime it should be distinctly understood that true scholarship
-does not, by any means, consist in thus knowing absolutely everything.
-The popular idea that learning consists in being a walking repository
-of all sorts of curious and of more or less ill-assorted erudition, is
-a most childish error. Scholarship may, perhaps, be properly defined as
-knowing _something_ about almost everything; but more especially every
-thing _about some one thing_. This is the true university idea. Some
-one has defined the university as being the school where _something_
-could be learned about everything, and _everything_ about some _one_
-thing. In other words, true scholarship consists in having just so much
-learning as one can not only digest and master but effectively use in
-connection with his own special work, or mission in life; in having
-the keys, if you please, that shall unlock and open up to one at will
-all the varied stores of knowledge; and more especially in being the
-undisputed master of just so much and of just such knowledge as he can
-himself best utilize. Just as no mechanic cares to encumber himself with
-more tools, or the soldier with more weapons, than he can advantageously
-use, so no true scholar, in our judgment, will covet more knowledge than
-he can render properly, wisely, available for service. Why, indeed, may
-not too much of a good thing, as well as too little—_l’embarrassment de
-richesse_ as well as the embarrassment of poverty—prove not a help but a
-burden, not a source of power but an occasion of weakness and a cause of
-stumbling?
-
-Let no one, therefore, be tempted to envy the attainments of certain
-knowing ones in those walks of literature, or of science, to which he is
-for the most a stranger; and, because of his ignorance comparatively on
-certain special lines of study and intellectual inquiry, to depreciate
-himself as a scholar. Rather, on the other hand, while thankful that, in
-your own chosen sphere, you have been enabled to give a good account of
-yourself and to render some service, however humble, to your kind, you
-should also rejoice that others have been called to explore fields of
-thought and inquiry by your feet as yet untrod.
-
-Who that, a few years ago, at the great Exposition at Philadelphia,
-walked through those acres of textile fabrics, miles of most ingenious
-machinery, and thousands of square yards of painting, but must have been
-profoundly impressed with the narrow limits of his own knowledge and
-attainments. And yet who, if really a sensible person, instead of feeling
-mortified and chagrined at all on this account, but was moved rather,
-at every step, silently to give thanks that here was presented another,
-and yet another branch of knowledge or industry concerning which it was
-his privilege to remain in profound and most contented ignorance? Why,
-indeed, should it be deemed specially important that, in order richly and
-intelligently to enjoy that marvellous display of the products of all
-nations, one should be altogether conversant with the Chinese puzzle, or
-versed in all the arts of sub-soiling, top-dressing, tile-draining, or
-stock-raising?
-
-Let the dictionaries, therefore, and the encyclopædias, the archives and
-the libraries, for the most part, serve as the treasure-houses of the
-materials of knowledge—especially of all more strictly technical and
-curious lore, properly classified, indexed, assorted, accessible. Let
-it be the part of scholarship, if you please, exhaustively to explore
-certain departments of learning as specialties; but to be content,
-meantime, as a general thing, to know where, and how readily to find, and
-to be able wisely to appropriate, and effectually to employ, as occasion
-may require, this accumulated and duly sifted and organized learning of
-the ages.
-
-
-
-
-EDITOR’S NOTE-BOOK.
-
-
-The discovery of a manuscript copy of “The Teachings of the Twelve
-Apostles,” a Christian compilation of the second century, has created
-a general expectation of new and better light by means of it, on early
-Christian history. The portions of this manuscript which have been
-published in this country are too brief to afford much satisfaction.
-The genuineness of the document is vouched for by Professor Harnack, of
-Giessen, one of the foremost patristic scholars. If there were not a
-general disposition to believe the manuscript to be genuine, we might
-note some circumstances as suspicious. Professor Harnack has believed
-and taught that such a book probably existed in the early centuries.
-If we were suspicious we should wonder whether another Saphira has
-not undertaken, of his own avaricious motion, to find what a great
-patristic scholar believes to exist—and to make discovery certain by
-constructing the desired document himself. No breath of suspicion taints
-the atmosphere, and the finding of the manuscript is regarded as a strong
-proof of the rare learning and sound judgment of Professor Harnack. But
-until the whole document, in the Original Greek, with a history of its
-discovery, has passed under the eyes of many scholars, it will be wise
-to keep our judgments in suspense respecting the genuineness and the
-importance of the document.
-
- * * * * *
-
-The new Congregational creed has been received with a good deal of favor.
-The aim of it is in the right direction; we leave others to decide
-whether or not it hits its mark. Theology consists of doctrines and
-explanations of doctrines. The aim of the authors of the new creed is to
-make a statement of doctrines, leaving explanations of doctrines to the
-field of liberty. It happens that the larger half of most creeds make
-doctrines out of explanations. For example, the deity of Jesus Christ is
-a doctrine; but along with it we hold a number of explanations of the
-doctrine. The atonement is a doctrine; but three-fourths of the texts
-of the creeds, on this subject, are explanatory theses. That Christ
-_died for us_ according to the Scriptures is doctrine; but the various
-theories called “Governmental,” “Substitutional,” “Moral Influence,”
-etc., are explanatory. That the Bible is God’s book, revealing Him
-and His law is doctrine; but the separation of the printers’ and
-proof-readers’ mistakes—that is all the failure in the human making-up
-of the book—proceeds by way of explanatory theology. If tolerably clear
-lines can be drawn between doctrine and explanation—we are not sure such
-a line can be drawn—then evangelical Christendom can have a common creed
-at once. The doctrinal unity exists in fact; we are only waiting for some
-one to state the doctrines clearly, leaving us to differ concerning the
-explanations. The new Congregational creed may prove to be a rough first
-sketch of the creed of Christendom. There is no doubt that the great body
-of Christians, though ranked in distinct divisions, has a common faith.
-Some symbolic expression of that faith is to be expected—is probably near
-at hand.
-
- * * * * *
-
-A shocking piece of news is that several women were recently attacked,
-and two of them killed, by wolves. That is bad enough, surely; but a
-greater shock will be experienced by the general reader when we add that
-the scene of this tragic incident was in southern Italy! Our habitual
-associations of Italian things are music, sculpture, architecture, and
-other high humanities, all overarched by beautiful sunshine. Most of us
-hardly realize that there has been a wolf in Italy since the demise of
-the one which suckled the boys who founded Rome. But in fact wolves and
-other ferocious beasts still reign in the Italian mountains, along with
-the brigands. The latter are not as numerous as when Spartacus collected
-an army of them which defeated Roman armies within sight of Naples.
-But the brigand is, like the wolf, an unconquerable element in Italian
-life. A few months ago, an Italian nobleman was captured by brigands
-who exacted and obtained fifty thousand dollars for restoring him to
-the bosom of his family. Add brigands and wolves to your “pictures from
-Italy.”
-
- * * * * *
-
-The regulation of railroad traffic has made more progress than the
-general public supposes. In Massachusetts, for instance, the Board of
-Railroad Commissioners say in their last report to the legislature that
-“No charge of unreasonable preference or discrimination by a lower charge
-for the longer haul has this year been brought before the board, except
-in two cases, where the evidence wholly failed to support the charges.”
-The Massachusetts system of supervision was founded twelve years ago
-by C. F. Adams, and the results obtained by him and his successors in
-office show clearly that an intelligent and judicious supervision by
-state authority benefits both parties—the railroads and their customers.
-But—and this point is the reason of the success in Massachusetts—there
-has not been one ounce of demagogism in the action of the commissioners.
-
- * * * * *
-
-The decision of the United States Supreme Court that Congress may
-issue paper money at its discretion has been received with lugubrious
-prophecies by a part of the press. It is probably good for us that the
-decision has been rendered now rather than a few years later—and it was
-certain to come. The good of it is, we know clearly what the powers and
-responsibilities of Congress are in regard to money. We can select our
-Congressmen with a plain and full understanding of their functions. The
-doubt which has hung over this subject for several years has had an
-unwholesome effect—“unsettled questions have no mercy on the peace of
-nations.” The people of this country are conservative under well defined
-responsibilities. Perhaps the prophets of evil have too little faith in
-the popular sense and conscience.
-
- * * * * *
-
-There is no sympathy in this country with the Irish dynamiters; but
-we are all more or less astonished by the gravity with which English
-newspapers rail at this country for not preventing the exportation of
-dynamite. The London _Times_ unconsciously puts its fingers on the proper
-place for the discovery of such dynamite when it calls attention to the
-fact that a ninety pound package of the murderous stuff got to London
-_through a British custom house_. The British custom house is the spot
-where the watching should be done. If the importation of goods was as
-closely supervised in England as it is in this country, no dynamite
-could reach London. We do not watch exportation closely because no
-export duties are allowed to be levied by the constitution. It is the
-inward movement, not the outward, for which we have official machinery
-of supervision. To invent and carry on machinery for watching exports
-is an expensive business in which we should not engage. It is entirely
-unnecessary. Let England watch at her own custom houses. If her officers
-admit dynamite in ninety pound cases, let her improve that branch of her
-civil service. The _Nation_ very judiciously says: “If the English custom
-house can not stop the infernal machines, it is folly to ask any foreign
-police to do it.”
-
- * * * * *
-
-Our suggestion that laws against intermarriage between races should be
-repealed (April number) has “shocked” one reader. Our friend does not get
-shocked at the right time and place. Intermarriage of white and colored
-persons is very rare, because nature and society exercise adequate
-restraint. The place for being shocked is in another part of the field.
-And yet it is an astounding fact that the peoples who are most easily
-shocked by the marriage of two persons of different races seem not to be
-shocked by the very large number of illegitimate children of dark skinned
-mothers. There is an exact parallel in the doctrine of the celibacy of
-the clergy, and the intense feeling which enforced it, in the days of
-Hildebrand. A recent writer says of that state of things: “The priest
-who kept a harem of concubines was simply guilty of a venial sin which
-did not vitiate his act as a priest; it was the act of marriage, with
-its more deliberate declaration of principle, which the church could not
-tolerate.” In both cases, that old case of mock celibacy and the present
-case of illegitimate mingling of races, the _feeling_ on the subject
-is very sincere, deep, aggressive, against _marriage_ “with its more
-deliberate declaration of principle.” But in each case the real evil
-evades the feeling and defeats its object with demoralizing effects.
-
- * * * * *
-
-They do some things better in France. The government has ordered
-observations to be made on strokes of lightning and their effects, by
-a bureau, using postmasters and others as observers. A report for the
-first half of 1883 shows that in January there was one lightning stroke
-which injured a man carrying an umbrella with metal ribs; in February
-there were no strokes; in March and April, four each month; in May
-twenty-eight; in June one hundred and thirteen. Seventy animals and seven
-men were killed, and about forty persons were injured. Lightning rods
-were treated with contempt, and the electric fluid especially attacked
-the bells and bell-towers of churches, and in one case blasted the gilt
-wooden figure of the Christ on a church which had a lightning rod.
-The second half of the year would of course show a longer chapter of
-accidents. Why can not we have in this country just such a system of
-collecting the facts about lightning strokes?
-
- * * * * *
-
-An interesting set of experiments is reported by Mr. G. H. Darwin, son of
-the great author of Darwinism, on right-leggedness and left-leggedness.
-The subject is of more importance than it seems. Most readers will
-remember that Charles Reade, the novelist, contended in a recent work
-that right-handedness is a fruit of bad education, and that, if children
-were not meddled with by nurses and teachers, both sides of the body
-would be equally strong and skilful. Mr. Darwin blindfolded a group of
-boys, having first ascertained whether they were right or left handed,
-and set them to walking toward a mark, leading them straight for three
-or four paces. All but one swung round to right or left, tending to a
-circular path, and the right-handed boys turned to the left, and the
-left-handed boys to the right. The one exception was a boy about equally
-expert with both hands. He went tolerably straight. Mr. Darwin’s opinion
-is that right-handed persons are left-legged, because every strong effort
-by the right hand is attended with a corresponding effort by the left
-leg. This does not, however, settle the question raised by Mr. Charles
-Reade; for left-leggedness is only an effect of right-handedness.
-
- * * * * *
-
-We shall have to study the machine politician a good deal before we
-dispense with his existence. In New York City, investigations show that
-the city offices, such as County Clerk, Register and Sheriff, afford from
-$50,000 to $100,000 a year of revenue to the man holding either office,
-and that he buys the office, never paying less than $50,000 for it to the
-bosses who control votes by arts that are as dark to respectable citizens
-as the mysteries of mediæval astrology. A man on a school board was
-caught selling teachers’ appointments. He was put off the board and went
-to selling liquor. In due time he became an alderman. The halls could
-not agree upon a president of the Board of Aldermen. Then the Republican
-boss made “a deal” with the Tammany hall and turned over the Republican
-aldermen’s votes to elect as president the smirched seller of teachers’
-places and bad whiskey. This man is mayor of New York when Mayor Edson is
-absent, and has recently acted as such. An intrigue of that sort is as
-well worth studying as the farewell letter of Washington. It opens the
-very heart of our political demoralization. The chief parties to this
-intrigue will both be at Chicago, one in June, the other in July, with
-the votes of their respective parties in New York City in their dirty
-hands. They are engaged in a commercial business the staple of which is
-ballots, and they amass fortunes by selling votes and offices.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Is there any other competitive industry which is exploited with so much
-skill as politics? We write these words in early April, within sixty
-days of the Republican convention, and we should hardly be able to
-affirm that any prominent candidate is an _avowed_ candidate. Are there
-no candidates, then? Is the nomination of the party which has ruled the
-country twenty-three years going a begging at Chicago? By no means. You
-are in the presence of management as a fine art. It is certain that the
-work of “getting up an interest” is going on briskly, and it is not
-possible that the candidates are ignorant of it. The popular pulse is
-rising, and there are men who can tell why it is rising. Perhaps the
-Democratic art is of a finer quality. Mr. Tilden has educated bright men
-in the delicate branches of political art. That there is no prominent
-candidate except Mr. Tilden, who is not a possible candidate, means that
-all dangerous aspirants are kept back by the candidacy of “the Sage of
-Greystone;” but the object of this suppression of candidates is out
-of sight. The children of this world are very wise in this political
-generation.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Our readers all know that the Methodist Episcopal General Conference
-meets May 1st in each Presidential election year. Not all of them have
-our opportunities of knowing what a wholesome effect the approaching
-session is having upon the seven or eight periodicals whose editors
-will be re-elected or relegated to pastoral cares by the conference.
-Ordinarily we can see small faults in these papers. Now we would as soon
-seek to find the proverbial “needle in a haystack” as to discover a
-blemish on the face of a Methodist periodical. A cynic at our elbow says:
-“What a pity the General Conference does not meet every year!” In sober
-earnest we must say that all these “official editors” have been outdoing
-their former selves during the last eight or ten months.
-
- * * * * *
-
-_Temple Bar_ for March contains a criticism of “The New School of
-American Fiction”—that of James and Howells—which makes some excellent
-points. Mr. Howells claims the art of fiction has become a finer art in
-our day than it was with Dickens and Thackeray. This reminds us of a
-story, as Lincoln used to say. Once a young preacher was warmly commended
-for his last sermon in the following terms: “It was a fine sermon, a
-very fine sermon, in fact it was so fine there was nothing of it.” The
-attenuated art of Mr. Howells spins out into a fineness which vanishes
-in nothingness. _Temple Bar_ thinks this “finer art” of our new school
-is a study of surface emotion and accidental types of mankind. The art
-is “a photograph where no artist’s hand has grouped the figures, only
-posed them before his lens.” Mr. Howells boasts that he finds “delight
-in the foolish, insipid face of real life.” But the life that wears that
-kind of face affords no material for art—is not _really_ real life.
-The accidental types which Mr. Howells paints so carefully please us
-just as a gossip’s description of a bridal dress pleases her feminine
-neighbor—for a moment. Sometimes we have seen specimens—as for example,
-Bartley Hubbard—of the transient creatures and recognize the photograph.
-But after all such photography is the function of the newspaper. We all
-know that last year’s newspaper is dull reading. The fiction produced by
-the “new school” will probably be just as dull in ten years. Dickens and
-Thackeray are much older than that and are still fascinating reading.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Is not the tone of the general newspaper press below that of the people
-who read newspapers? Are our people as slangy, coarse and low-toned as
-the average newspaper is? We do not believe that the people who _read_
-the papers are as vulgar-minded as the average reporter supposes them to
-be. We have read many defenses of the newspaper methods; but we never
-heard of a newspaper which died by becoming decent and wholesome. The
-reporter is trying to please a class which rarely reads anything, and is
-displeasing his habitual patrons. Let the latter take courage and tell
-him the simple truth and ask him to write English in future. A few talks
-of this nature will do the young man good.
-
- * * * * *
-
-The name of Adelaide Bell Morgan, Stapleton, N. Y., should have been
-among the list of C. L. S. C. graduates of the class of ’83, published in
-THE CHAUTAUQUAN for February.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Mr. W. A. Duncan, the new secretary of the Chautauqua Assembly, requests
-that all questions concerning Chautauqua matters should be addressed to
-him at Syracuse, N. Y.
-
- * * * * *
-
-A late number of _Harper’s Weekly_ says of Mrs. P. L. Collins, the author
-of the interesting article on the Dead-Letter Office which appears in
-this number of THE CHAUTAUQUAN: “Mrs. Collins has for several years held
-an important and responsible position in the Dead-Letter Office. Her fine
-culture, varied attainments, and the skill and ability displayed in the
-performance of the difficult and intricate duties of the service have won
-for her high and well deserved repute. No one is better qualified than
-Mrs. Collins to give our readers an insight into the workings of this
-important branch of our postal service.”
-
-
-
-
-C. L. S. C. NOTES ON REQUIRED READINGS FOR MAY.
-
-
-PICTURES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY.
-
-In reading “Pictures from English History” the “Chronology,” (page 274)
-will be found indispensable. It gives a complete and concise summary of
-English history while the most prominent features of that history are
-fully displayed in the “Pictures.”
-
-P. 12.—“Druid.” The origin of the word is obscure; the common derivation
-from the Greek word for _oak_, the best authorities consider fanciful,
-and give their preference to the derivation from the Celtic words for
-_God_ and _speaking_. Many of their rites have been found to be similar
-to those of the Oriental religions, thus indicating that the religion was
-brought to Gaul at the time of an Asiatic invasion. Their centers in Gaul
-were along the Loire and in modern Brittany.
-
-“Serpent’s egg.” The most remarkable of all the Druidical charms was the
-anguineum or snake’s egg. It was said to be produced from the saliva and
-frothy sweat of a number of serpents writhing in an entangled mass, and
-to be tossed up into the air as soon as it was formed. The fortunate
-Druid who managed as it fell to catch it in his sagum, or cloak, rode
-off at full speed on a horse that had been waiting for him, pursued by
-the serpents till they were stopped by the intervention of a running
-stream. Pliny declares that he had seen one. “It is,” he says, “about the
-size of a moderately large, round apple, and has a cartilaginous rind,
-studded with cavities like those on the arm of a polypus.”—_Encyclopædia
-Britannica._
-
-P. 13.—“Stonehenge,” stōnˈhĕnj. Hanging stones, the word means. About
-eight miles north of Salisbury (see map) there is a collection of about
-one hundred and forty large stones, ranging in weight from ten to seventy
-tons. Many of them are still in their original positions, showing that
-they were arranged in two ovals within two circles, and were surrounded
-by a bank of dirt fifteen feet high, and ten hundred and ten feet in
-circumference. Not all authorities agree that Stonehenge was a Druid
-temple, some asserting that it was an astronomical observatory, and
-others that it was a place for assemblies of the people.
-
-“Kit’s Coty House.” A cromlech, as the primitive monuments of the
-Scandinavians and Celts were called. It is composed of three upright
-stones about eight feet square by two thick, which support an irregular
-stone roof eleven feet long by eight wide. The name is a contraction of
-Kitigern’s coty house; _i. e._, Kitigern’s house made from _coits_, the
-Celtic word for huge, flat stones. Kitigern was a leader of the Britains
-slain in a battle against Hengist and Horsa.
-
-P. 14.—“Cassivellaunus,” casˈsi-ve-lauˌnus; “Chertsey,” chesˈse;
-“Hertfordshire,” harˈfurd-shire.
-
-P. 15.—“Aulus Plautius,” auˈlus plauˈti-us. He was a Roman consul when,
-in A. D. 48, he was sent to Britain, where he remained four years.
-
-“Ostorius Scapula,” os-toˈri-us scapˈula. He went to Britain about A. D.
-50. Soon after sending Caractacus to Rome, Scapula died in the province.
-
-“Caractacus,” ca-racˈta-cus.
-
-P. 16.—“Suetonius,” swe-toˈni-us. It was during the reign of the Emperor
-Nero that Suetonius fought in Britain. Previous to this campaign he had
-carried war against the Moors. After returning from Britain he was made
-consul. “Boadicea,” bo-adˈi-ceˌa.
-
-P. 17.—“Agricola” (37-93). Agricola had been trained in military
-service in Britain under Suetonius. Subsequently he had been governor
-of Aquitania, and consul at Rome. As governor of Britain he was very
-successful until the jealousy of the emperor, Domitian, caused his
-return. Tacitus, the historian, was his son-in-law, and wrote his life.
-
-“Hadrian” (76-138). Roman emperor. His trip to Britain was made about 119.
-
-“Severus.” Emperor of Rome from 193-211. It was 208 that he went to
-Britain where he carried on a campaign until his death at York.
-
-“Carausius,” ca-rauˈsi-us. Maximian had given Carausius the command of
-a fleet which was to protect the coast of Gaul. Dissatisfied with him,
-the emperor ordered his execution. Carausius discovering this crossed
-to Gaul and proclaimed himself Augustus. When the Roman emperors found
-it impossible to subdue him they made him a colleague. He ruled Britain
-until he was slain in 293.
-
-P. 18.—“Honorius,” ho-noˈri-us. Roman emperor from 395-423.
-
-P. 21.—“Hengist,” hĕnˈgĭst. A Jutish prince who, with his brother, Horsa,
-landed with a fleet on the Isle of Thanet about 449. At this time the
-Britains needed assistance against the incursions of the Picts and Scots,
-and hired Hengist and his troops. After repelling the barbarians the
-Saxons concluded to conquer Britain for themselves. After years of war
-Hengist succeeded in driving the Britains from Kent. He then established
-his court at Canterbury, where he reigned about thirty years.
-
-“Cerdic.” In 495 a band of Saxons, under Cerdic, attempted the conquest
-of southern Britain. In 519 the crown of the West Saxons was put on
-Cerdic’s head, but the next year the battle of Mount Bradon checked the
-advance.
-
-“Old Sarum.” A city two miles north of Salisbury, or New Sarum. It was
-deserted for the new site in the fifteenth century.
-
-“Marlborough,” mawlˈbrŭh. A town of Wiltshire.
-
-“Cirencester,” ciˈren-ces-ter. A town about fifteen miles south-east of
-Gloucester.
-
-“Ceaulin,” ceuˈlin.
-
-P. 22.—“Armorica,” ar-morˈi-ca. A name formerly given to the northwestern
-part of Gaul from the Loire to the Seine. The influx of Britons caused
-the country to be called Brittany.
-
-“Osismii,” o-sisˈmi-i. A people of Gaul in the neighborhood of the modern
-Quimper and Brest. See map in THE CHAUTAUQUAN for March.
-
-“Vannes,” vän; “Rennes,” ren; “Mantes,” mants. Towns of western France.
-
-“Vortimer,” vorˈti-mer. His father, Vorˈti-gern, was the chief of the
-British kings when Hengist came to Britain. Being unable to cope with the
-Saxon leader, Vortigern was deposed, and his son made commander. Hengist
-and Horsa were three times defeated under his leadership, Horsa being
-slain in the last battle. Hengist then returned to his country until
-Vortimer’s death, when Vortigern was restored. On the return of Hengist
-the whole country was easily conquered.
-
-P. 23.—“Ambrosius Aurelianus,” am-broˈsi-us au-reˈli-a-nus.
-
-“Arthur.” As the legend runs Arthur was the son of Uter Pendragon. His
-high birth was concealed until he one day drew from the stone in which it
-was concealed a sword with the inscription: “Whoso pulleth this sword out
-of this stone is rightwise born king of England.” Several years after he
-was crowned, he received the enchanted Round Table which had belonged to
-his father, and formed about it that circle of knights whose brilliant
-exploits form so large a part of English legendary history. Arthur was
-finally wounded in battle, and carried away by the fairies, who were to
-restore him to the Celts upon his recovery.
-
-“Jeffrey of Monmouth.” An old English chronicler of the first half of the
-twelfth century. He compiled a history of the Britains, professing to
-be a translation from an old Welsh manuscript. The historical value is
-doubted. It contains the legends of Arthur and his court, and Merlin’s
-“Prophecies.”
-
-“Knights of the Round-Table.” This Round-Table had been made by Merlin
-for Uter Pendragon. It was circular, it was said to prevent jealousy
-about precedent. The number of knights which Arthur had is variously
-estimated as twelve, forty, and one hundred and fifty. These knights went
-into all countries seeking adventures. Their chief exploits occurred in
-search of the Holy Cup brought to Britain by Joseph of Arimathea.
-
-“Uter,” uˈter. Pendragon (chief) was the follower of Ambrosius as leader
-of the Britons, and the father of King Arthur.
-
-P. 24.—“Merlin.” The Prince of Enchanters. The legends represent Merlin
-as the son of a demon. His supernatural powers recommended him to King
-Vortigern as a counselor, a position which he afterward filled to
-Ambrosius, Uter Pendragon and Arthur. Merlin finally fell a victim to a
-charm which he had taught his mistress, Vivien. See Tennyson’s “Merlin
-and Vivien.”
-
-“Lancelot,” lănˈce-lot. One of the chief knights of the Round-Table,
-called “the darling of the court.” He is often spoken of as _Lancelot du
-Lac_ (of the lake), as he was educated at the court of Vivien, known as
-the Lady of the Lake. Lancelot was celebrated for his amours with Queen
-Guinevere, the wife of King Arthur, and the exploits which he undertook
-for her.
-
-“Tristam.” A knight of the Round-Table. A nephew of the king of Cornwall.
-He had gone to Ireland, where, being wounded, he was healed by the
-Princess Iseult. Returning he told his uncle of her beauty. The latter
-sent for Iseult and married her, though she loved Tristam. Years after
-his own marriage, Tristam was again wounded, and was told that only
-Iseult could heal him. She was sent for, but his wife from jealousy,
-persuaded him that she was not coming, and he died. Matthew Arnold has a
-poem on this story.
-
-P. 25.—“Aurochs,” auˈrochs. A species of wild ox, contemporary with the
-mammoths, but now only found in Lithuania and the forests of the Caucasus.
-
-P. 26.—“Sagas.” The name given to the Scandinavian historical and
-mythological tales.
-
-“Edda.” A book containing Scandinavian poetry and mythology. There are
-two Eddas. The earliest is in thirty-nine poems containing mythology. The
-second is a collection of the myths of the gods, with instructions in the
-types and meters of the pagan poetry for the benefit of young poets. It
-is chiefly in prose.
-
-P. 27.—“Tarpeian Rock,” tar-peiˈan. A part of the Capitoline hill. It
-is said that once while the Sabines were warring against the Romans,
-Tarpeia, the daughter of the governor of the citadel on the Capitoline
-offered to open the gates to the enemy if they would give her “what they
-wore on their arms,” meaning their bracelets. They promised, but on
-entering crushed her with their shields. She was buried on the hill, and
-her name is still preserved in the name of the rock.
-
-“Jupiter Sator.” After the Sabines had gained possession of the city
-through the treachery of Tarpeia, a battle was fought, in which the
-Sabines were prevailing when Romulus vowed a temple to Jupiter, and the
-god gave him the victory.
-
-P. 31.—“Eulogius,” eu-loˈgi-us.
-
-“Oswald.” He became king of Northumbria about 635. The Welsh had shortly
-before this allied themselves under their king Cadwallon, or Cædwalla,
-with the king of Mercia, had defeated the Northumbrians and had slain
-their king. At the time of Oswald’s succession the Welsh were still in
-the north, and he attacked them. The cross being set up as a standard
-Oswald held it till the hollow in which it was to stand was filled in
-by his soldiers. Throwing himself on his knees he called on his army to
-pray. Cadwallon was slain on “Heaven’s field,” as this battle ground was
-called, and Oswald for nine years held the chief power. He was finally
-slain by Penda.
-
-“Maserfelth,” maˈser-felth.
-
-“Penda.” He became king of Mercia early in the seventh century. His life
-was spent in fighting for the old religion of the country. In 655 he met
-Oswin, or Oswi, the king of Northumbria, and was defeated in a battle, in
-which Green says “the cause of the older gods was lost forever.”
-
-“Offa.” King of Mercia from 758 to 796. Charlemagne, his contemporary,
-called him “the most powerful of the Christian kings of the West.”
-
-P. 32.—“Iona,” or Icolmkill. An island of the Hebrides, where Columba
-founded a monastery. Columba (521-597) was born in Ireland and trained
-in the monasteries. Trouble with a priest led to his being driven from
-the country. He went to Iona, where he founded a community which grew
-very rapidly and sent out many missionaries. Columba attained a great
-reputation, and built, it is said, 300 churches.
-
-“Wilfred.” (634?-709.) “The life of Wilfrith (or Wilfred), of York, was
-a mere series of flights to Rome and returns to England, of wonderful
-successes in pleading the right of Rome to the obedience of the Church of
-Northumbria, and of as wonderful defeats.”—_Green._
-
-“Biscop.” “Benedict Biscop worked toward the same end in a quieter
-fashion, coming backward and forward across the sea with books and relics
-and cunning masons and painters to rear a great church and monastery at
-Wearmouth, whose brethren owed allegiance to the Roman See.”—_Green._
-
-“Cædmon,” kĕdˈmon. The father of English song. He died in 680. According
-to traditions he was a swineherd to the monks of Whiteby. One night an
-angel appeared to him and commanded him to sing. Awakening, the words of
-a poem on creation came to him. He was admitted to the monastery as a
-member, after this. Milton is said to have taken the idea of “Paradise
-Lost” from this poem.
-
-“Adhelm,” adˈhelm.
-
-“Jarrow.” A town of Durham on the Tyne, where Biscop had founded a
-monastery, and where Bede was buried.
-
-P. 33.—“Ethelwulf,” ĕthˈel-wŏolf; “Osburga,” osˈbur-ga.
-
-P. 38.—“Hastings.” A Scandinavian viking born about 812. He joined a band
-of marauding Northmen, of whom he soon gained entire control. Leading his
-band against France he devasted the banks of the Loire, went thence to
-Spain where he pillaged Lisbon and burned Seville. Afterward he went to
-Tuscany, and by stratagem captured Rome. Having made another successful
-invasion of France, Hastings sailed to England, but was repulsed by King
-Alfred. Soon after he left his roving life to settle in Denmark, where
-his identity is lost.
-
-P. 41.—“Dunstan,” dŭnˈstan; “Athelstane,” ĕthˈel-stăn.
-
-“Glastonbury,” glasˈton-bury. A town of Somerset, near Bath.
-
-P. 42.—“Crediton,” credˈi-ton. A town of Devonshire.
-
-P. 43.—“Elgiva,” el-giˈva.
-
-P. 44.—“Cambria.” The ancient Latin name for Wales.
-
-“Sterlingshire.” A central county of Scotland. Bannockburn is within its
-limits.
-
-“Argyle.” A western county of Scotland, including several islands near
-the coast. Its hills are famous for their picturesque beauty. The columns
-and cave of Staffa are within its limits.
-
-P. 46.—“Elfrida,” elˈfri-da. The second wife of Edgar. The story of the
-wooing of Elfrida tells that Edgar having heard of her great beauty,
-sent his minister and friend to ascertain if the reports were true. The
-minister was so captivated with her charms that he misrepresented her
-beauty to the king and married her himself. When Edgar discovered the
-deceit, he promptly killed his friend and married Elfrida.
-
-P. 48.—“Canute,” ka-nūtˈ. The second king of Denmark of that name. He was
-the son of King Sweyn, of Denmark, and came over with him to England.
-Sweyn failed to establish his power, but left the succession to Canute,
-who, after obtaining forces from his native land, completed the conquest.
-
-P. 51.—“St. John.” (1801-1875.) An English author and traveler. He has
-written several volumes of histories, travels and philosophy.
-
-“Beau Ideal.” A model of beauty; ideal perfection.
-
-P. 53.—“Sobriquet,” sŏbˈre-kāˌ. A nickname. The word is sometimes
-incorrectly spelt _soubriquet_.
-
-“Falaise,” fă-laisz. A town of Normandy, France.
-
-“Palgrave.” (1788-1861.) An English author.
-
-P. 54.—“Thierry,” tyārˌreˈ. Jacques Nicholas Augustin (1795-1856). A
-French historian. He established a reputation as one of the most original
-historians of his times by a history of the conquest of England by the
-Normans. Several other volumes, mainly French histories, were written by
-him.
-
-P. 59.—“Pizarro,” pe-zārˈo. (1475?-1541.) A Spanish adventurer. Early
-in the sixteenth century he assisted in the settlement of Darien. Being
-anxious to explore the western coast of Peru for gold, he obtained
-supplies of men and arms several times from the governor of Darien, but
-the force was insufficient to accomplish his purpose. Pizarro at last
-went to Spain and obtained from Charles V. the right to conquest and
-discovery in Peru. The expedition was successful, but a quarrel with
-Almagro, his partner, led to a civil war, in which Pizarro was slain. His
-descendants bearing the title of Marquis of the Conquest are still to be
-found in Trujillo, Spain.
-
-P. 61.—“Malmesbury,” mämzˈber-ĭ, William of. (1095?-1143.) He was the
-librarian of the monastery of Malmesbury, and the author of several
-valuable historical works.
-
-“Guizot,” geˌzoˈ. (1787-1874.) A French statesman and historian.
-
-“Lisieux,” leˈze-uhˌ. A city of Normandy, formerly the seat of a
-bishopric, but in 1801 the diocese was abolished.
-
-“Peter the Hermit.” (1050-1115.) He had tried several pursuits, but
-finally became a hermit. In 1093 he made a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. The
-condition of things there led to his preaching the Crusades. He led the
-first band of Crusaders, and afterward was associated with Godfrey of
-Bouillon. After the capture of Jerusalem he returned to Europe where he
-founded an abbey in which he passed the rest of his life.
-
-P. 65.—“Godfrey of Bouillon,” booˈyonˌ. (1060?-1100.) In the struggle
-of Henry IV., of Germany, with Pope Gregory VII., Godfrey had aided
-Henry, and was the first to scale the walls of Rome at its capture. This
-violation of the sacred city burdened his conscience, and he went on the
-First Crusade, of which he became the virtual leader. In 1099 Godfrey
-captured Jerusalem after a siege of thirty-eight days. He took the title
-of duke, though offered a crown. On his death his brother succeeded him,
-assuming the title of Baldwin I., King of Jerusalem.
-
-“Count of Vermandois,” vĕrˌmŏnˈdwaˌ. Brother of the French king, Philip I.
-
-“Bohemond,” bōˈhe-mŏnd. (1060?-1111.) The eldest son of Robert Guiscard.
-Being expelled from his father’s throne he took a prominent part in the
-Crusades, and was made prince of Antioch. Returning to Europe he married
-the daughter of the king of France, and marched against Alexis, the
-emperor of Constantinople. He was unsuccessful, and concluded peace. His
-death occurred soon after.
-
-“Tancred,” tănkˈred. (1078-1112.) A cousin of Bohemond. He acted a
-distinguished part in the war against the Turks, attaining distinction
-at the sieges of Nicæa and Antioch, and at the storming of Jerusalem.
-He assisted Bohemond, and after the latter returned to Europe, Tancred
-defended Antioch. After the defeat of Bohemond, Tancred defeated the
-Saracens and drove the Sultan from Syria.
-
-P. 67.—“Brabanion.” Soldiers from Brabant, one of the divisions of the
-Netherlands.
-
-P. 68.—“Angevins,” änˈjāˌvŏnˌ. The inhabitants of Anjou.
-
-P. 69.—“Ely.” The fens of Ely were a portion of the section known now as
-the “Bedford Level,” a district in eastern England, which was formerly a
-vast morass, but which in the seventeenth century was reclaimed by the
-Earl of Bedford.
-
-“Baldwin de Rivier,” deh reˈveerˈ; “Lenoir,” le-noreˈ.
-
-P. 73.—“Hauberk,” hâuˈbërk. A coat of mail used in the middle ages, being
-a jacket or tunic, with wide sleeves reaching a little below the elbow,
-and with short trousers terminating at the knee.—_Fairholt._
-
-“De la Chesnage,” deh lä chĕsˈnazhˌ.
-
-P. 76.—“Brito,” brĭtˈo; “Fitzurse,” fitsˈurs.
-
-P. 86.—“Real,” rēˈal. A Spanish and Mexican silver coin worth about 12½
-cents.
-
-“Lists.” A place enclosed for combats.
-
-“Pursuivants,” pürˈswe-vănt. A follower or attendant.
-
-P. 87.—“Brian de Bois Guilbert,” bre-ŏnˈ deh bwä gĕlˌbêrˈ. A brave but
-voluptuous commander of the Knights Templar in Scott’s Ivanhoe.
-
-“Front de Bœuf,” frōn deh bŭf; “Richard de Malvoisin,” deh mălˈvwäˌsănˌ;
-“Grantmesnil,” grantˈmāsˌnelˌ; “Vipont,” veˈpŏnˌ.
-
-“St. John of Jerusalem.” A religious and military order which originated
-in the middle of the eleventh century. A chapel and hostelries had been
-built at Jerusalem near the Holy Sepulchre. The fraternity who cared
-for them showed such courage during the siege of Jerusalem that many
-knights and princes attached themselves to the hospitallers, and in
-1113 the order was approved as “Brothers Hospitallers of St. John in
-Jerusalem.” To monastic vows were added those of bearing arms in defense
-of Christianity. Many services were rendered to religion, but the order
-growing rich, degenerated. After the fall of Jerusalem it was established
-at Markab, and in 1291 removed to Cyprus. In 1530 the knights took Malta
-and retained it until its capture by Bonaparte in 1798. Since that time
-the order has existed only in name.
-
-P. 88.—“La Reyne de la,” etc. The queen of love and beauty.
-
-P. 89.—“Caracoled.” Wheeled about.
-
-P. 92.—“Laissez Aller.” Go.
-
-P. 93.—“Beau-scant.” The name of the Templars’ banner, which was half
-white, half black, to intimate, it is said, that they were candid and
-fair toward Christians, but black and terrible toward infidels.
-
-“Desdichado.” Scott says of this knight: “His suit of armor was formed of
-steel richly inlaid with gold, and the device on his shield was a young
-oak tree pulled up by the roots, with the Spanish word _Desdichado_,
-signifying disinherited.”
-
-P. 96.—“Chamfron,” chămˈfron. An ancient piece of armor for the head of a
-horse.
-
-P. 99.—“St. Edmundsbury” or Bury St. Edmunds. A borough in Suffolkshire.
-It received its name from Edmund, the Saxon king and martyr.
-
-P. 102.—“Ankerwyke,” anˈker-wike.
-
-P. 103.—“Lewes,” luˈis.
-
-“Mortimer.” The Earl of March. During the reign of Edward II. he became
-virtual sovereign of England, by favor of Queen Isabella. Through his
-instrumentality the king was imprisoned, and in 1326 murdered. Mortimer
-tried to gain control of the young prince, but was seized and hung in
-1330.
-
-P. 104.—“Llewelyn,” le-welˈin. Prince of Wales 1246. Was through life
-engaged in contests with the English, but finally submitted and resigned
-his territory 1277; revolted again and was killed by Mortimer 1282.
-
-P. 105.—“Justiciar,” jus-tishˈe-ar. Judge.
-
-“Marcher.” The border barons. The word _march_ means border. It is used
-chiefly in the plural, and in the English history applied to the border
-territories between England and Scotland, and England and Wales.
-
-P. 106.—“Glamorgan,” gla-morˈgan. The most southerly of the counties of
-Wales.
-
-P. 107.—“Hugh Dispenser.” The son of Simon de Montfort.
-
-P. 109.—“Mareschal,” märˈshal. The word is now written _marshal_. A
-military officer of high rank.
-
-P. 111.—“De Bohun,” deh boˈhun; “Inchaffray,” inˈchaf-fray; “Ingelram de
-Umphraville,” inˈgel-ram deh umphˈre-ville.
-
-P. 113.—“Ponthieu,” pōngˈte-ŭh.
-
-“Houseled,” houzˈeld. An obsolete word, meaning that they had received
-the eucharist.
-
-P. 114.—“Salet,” sălˈet. A light helmet used by foot soldiers.
-
-P. 115.—“Froissart,” froisˈärt (1337-1410). A French chronicler. He had
-been destined for the priesthood, but became interested in preparing a
-history of the wars of his time. He went to England to collect materials,
-where he held a state position until he had attained his object; then he
-visited Scotland and Italy before returning to a clerical position in
-France. His life as country priest did not suit him and he joined the
-duke of Brabant. Having traveled through several countries, collected a
-volume of poems and observed the life of nearly all the courts of western
-Europe, Froissart devoted the rest of his days to completing his great
-work, “The chronicles of the wonderful adventures, great enterprises and
-feats of arm which happened during my time in France, England, Brittany,
-Scotland, Spain, Portugal, and elsewhere.”
-
-“St. Denis.” A bishop of France in the third century who by legendary
-writers is confounded with Dionysius the Areopagite. The latter was an
-Athenian philosopher, who became a convert to St. Paul, and traveled
-through many countries preaching Christ. Arriving at Paris he resolved to
-stay there as a preacher. After several years of service he was executed.
-“He became the patron of the French monarchy, his name the war cry of the
-French armies. The famous oriflamme—the standard of France—was the banner
-consecrated upon his tomb.”
-
-“Alençon,” ä-lĕnˈson.
-
-P. 118.—“La Brayes,” lă brwa; “Reynault,” ráˈnōlˌ.
-
-P. 119.—“Entrepot,” ŏng-tr-pō. A free port where goods are received and
-deposited.
-
-“Vienne,” ve-enˈ.
-
-P. 121.—“Gossip.” This word was formerly used in the sense of comrade,
-friend.
-
-“Jehan d’Airs,” jāˈänˌdăr; “Jacques de Wisant,” zhäk deh veˈsŏnˌ.
-
-P. 124.—“John Ball.” An English fanatical preacher in the reign of
-Richard II. executed at Coventry in 1381. He had been repeatedly
-excommunicated for preaching ‘errors and schisms and scandals against the
-pope, the archbishops, bishops and clergy,’ and when Wyckliffe began to
-preach he adopted some of the reformer’s doctrines, and engrafted them
-on his own. He joined Wat Tyler’s rebellion in 1381, and at Blackheath
-preached to a hundred thousand of the insurgents a violent democratic
-sermon on the text,
-
- “When Adam delved and Eve span
- Who was then the gentleman?”
-
-P. 128.—“Good Parliament.” In the reign of Edward III., and so called
-from the severity with which it pursued the party of the duke of
-Lancaster.
-
-P. 129.—“Peter’s Pence.” An annual tribute of one penny paid at the feast
-of St. Peter to the See of Rome. At one time it was collected from every
-family, but afterwards it was restricted to those who had the value of
-thirty pence in quick or live stock. This tax was collected in England
-from 740 till it was abolished by Henry VIII.
-
-P. 137.—“Cinque Ports,” sink ports. The five English Channel ports of
-Hastings, Romney, Hythe, Dover, and Sandwich. These ports lying opposite
-to France received peculiar privileges in the days of early English
-history, on condition of providing in time of war a certain number of
-ships at their own expense.
-
-P. 138.—“Chandos.” (Sir John.) An English soldier of the fourteenth
-century, whose valor and virtue have been greatly praised by the
-historians of the time. At Crecy, Poitiers and Auray he won honors, was
-made constable of Aquitane, and seneschal of Poitou. On his death the
-king of France exclaimed that he was the only warrior who could have made
-peace between him and the king of England.
-
-“Du Guesclin,” dü gāˈklănˌ (1314?-1380). Constable of France, and its
-most famous warrior during his life.
-
-“Saint George.” The patron saint of England. Was at once the GREAT SAINT
-of the Greek Church and the patron of the chivalry of Europe. According
-to the legends he lived in the time of the emperor Diocletian. He
-performed many marvelous feats in defense of his religion, and suffered
-terrible persecution; when finally he was beheaded he was placed at the
-head of the martyrs. Mrs. Jameson says: “The particular veneration paid
-to him in England dates from the time of Richard I., who in the wars of
-Palestine placed himself and his army under the especial protection of
-St. George.”
-
-“Derby,” earl of, afterward earl of Lancaster. A cousin of Edward III.,
-who defended the English provinces in France against the French, winning
-a fine reputation as a warrior.
-
-“Hawkwood.” Sir John. An English military adventurer of the fourteenth
-century. He fought for Gregory XI., and for the king of Naples, and won
-great renown for daring and skill.
-
-
-
-
-NOTES ON REQUIRED READINGS IN “THE CHAUTAUQUAN.”
-
-
-READINGS FROM ROMAN HISTORY.
-
-P. 437, c. 1.—“Horatii,” ho-raˈti-i; “Curiatii,” cuˈri-aˌti-i.
-
-P. 438, c. 1.—“Cineas.” See Notes in THE CHAUTAUQUAN, page 370. “Manius
-Curius,” manˈi-us cuˈri-us; “Cornelius Rufinus,” cor-neˈli-us ru-fiˈnus;
-“Fabricius,” fa-bricˈi-us.
-
-“Heraclea,” herˈa-cleˌa. A city in Lucania, near the Tarentine Gulf. It
-was here that the first battle between Pyrrhus and the Romans took place
-in which the latter were defeated.
-
-“Appius Claudius,” apˈpi-us clauˈdi-us. He was censor in 312, when he
-built the Appian aqueduct and commenced the Appian Way. Appius was the
-earliest Roman writer whose name has come down to us.
-
-P. 438, c. 2.—“Chaonians,” chā-oˈni-ans. Inhabitants of Chaonia, a
-division of Epirus.
-
-“Molossians,” mo-losˈsi-ans. A people of Epirus.
-
-“Lucanians,” lu-caˈni-ans. Inhabitants of Lucania. A district of Lower
-Italy, corresponding to a part of the kingdom of Naples.
-
-“Bruttians,” brutˈti-ans. The district south of Lucania, in the southern
-extremity of Italy was called Bruttium, from which the people were called
-Bruttians.
-
-
-READINGS IN ART.
-
-P. 442.—“Dürer,” düˈrer; “Schongauer,” shōnˈgow-er. More generally known
-as Martin Schön (the beautiful Martin). Among the Italians he was called
-“Bel Martino,” and the French called him “Beau Martin”—so named from
-the beauty of his works. He lived in the fifteenth century—the greatest
-German artist of that period. His paintings are rare, he being more
-famous as an engraver than as a painter. A fine collection of his prints
-are in the British Museum.
-
-“Wolgemut,” wolˈge-moot. (1434-1519.) A native of Wurtemburg, who devoted
-himself chiefly to the carving and manufacture of huge altar chests and
-other specimens of church furniture. Specimens of his painting are in the
-gallery at Munich, also at Zwickau, and at Nuremburg.
-
-“Florins,” flŏrˈins. A silver coin of Florence first used in the twelfth
-century. The name is given to various coins, in different countries; the
-value varying from twenty-three to fifty-four cents.
-
-“Giovanni Bellini,” jo-väˈnee bel-leeˈnee. (1426-1516.) Generally
-regarded as the founder of the Venetian school of painting. He decorated
-the walls of the Hall of the Council, painted many church pieces, and a
-few portraits.
-
-“Zisselgasse,” tsiss-el-gassˈä; “Bruges,” brüzh.
-
-P. 443, c. 1.—“Shahpour,” shaˈpoor; “Pirkheimer,” pirkˈhi-mer; “Holbein,”
-hōlˈbin.
-
-“Kugler,” koogˈler. (1808-1858.) A German writer whose works on the
-history of art met with great success. He also wrote histories and
-published a volume of poems and several successful dramas.
-
-“Bâle,” bäl.
-
-“Rathaus,” rawtˈhous. Counsel house.
-
-P. 443, c. 2.—“More.” (1480-1535.) An English statesman. He was finely
-educated at the university, and afterward studied law. At the bar he
-became very successful. Under Henry VIII. he was employed in many public
-affairs until he won that monarch’s dislike by refusing to consent to his
-divorce from the queen. This dislike led to a charge of treason being
-preferred against him, and he was condemned and executed.
-
-“Chelsea,” chelˈse. Formerly a village about two miles from London, but
-now a suburb. The famous military hospital for invalid soldiers and the
-royal military asylum for the support and education of the children of
-soldiers are at Chelsea.
-
-“In tempera.” “_Tempera_ painting or _distemper_, as it is now called, is
-that in which the pigments are mixed with chalk or clay, and mixed with
-weak glue or size.”
-
-“Easterlings.” The popular name of traders from the Baltic and Germany
-during the Middle Ages.
-
-“Francesco Sforza,” fran-chĕsˈko sfortˈsä.
-
-“Friedrich Overbeck,” fredˈric oˌver-bekˈ.
-
-“Degli Angeli,” deˈglee änˈgel-ee.
-
-“Tasso.” (1144-1595.) An Italian poet. His “Jerusalem Delivered” was an
-epic poem on the delivery of the holy city by Godfrey of Bouillon.
-
-P. 444, c. 1.—“Marchese Massimo,” marˈchez mäs-seeˈmo; “Städel,” stäˈdel.
-
-“Van Eyck,” van-ikˈ. These brothers, Huibrecht and Jan Van Eyck, lived
-in the latter part of the fourteenth and first part of the fifteenth
-centuries. They attained a great success, which was undoubtedly due to
-the discovery of a new process for mixing colors with oil. This discovery
-led to a new coloring known as “the purple of Van Eyck.”
-
-“Matsys,” mätˌsisˈ. (1460?-1529.) He is said to have been a blacksmith
-in early life, and to have been a self-taught artist. His pictures are
-highly colored and finished. One of his best is an altar piece in the
-cathedral at Antwerp.
-
-“Siegen,” seˈgen.
-
-“Paolo Veronese,” pawˈlo vá-ro nā-zá. Commonly known as Cagliari
-(kälˈjä-ree) (1530?-1588.) A native of Verona. When quite young he
-painted the dome of the cathedral at Mantua, and soon after gained a
-prize at Venice from several eminent painters. His splendid coloring
-made his pictures very famous. One of the best known is the “Marriage of
-Cana,” in the Louvre. He also painted portraits of great merit.
-
-“Vincenzo Gonzaga,” vin-senˈzo gon-zäˈgä.
-
-“Giulio Romano,” jooˈle-o ro-mäˈno (1492-1546.) The most famous disciple
-of Raphael. “He was particularly successful as an original painter
-in battle pieces, and other warlike subjects, and was, above all, an
-inimitable designer.”
-
-“Lichtenstein,” lĭkˈten-stine.
-
-“Whitehall.” A famous royal palace of London of great historical
-interest. The old palace was burnt in 1697, leaving only a banqueting
-hall, which was converted into a Chapel Royal by George I.
-
-“Fourment,” foor-mentˈ.
-
-P. 444, c. 1.—“Decius.” Emperor of Rome from 249 to 251.
-
-“Ixion,” ixˈion; “Antoon van Dyck,” anˈtoon van dikeˈ.
-
-P. 445, c. 1.—“Velasquez,” vä-lasˈkes. (1599-1660.) A painter of Seville.
-He studied with the best masters of the times and early attained a
-success which led to his being appointed court painter to Philip IV. In
-1627 Velasquez visited Rome to study the masters there. On his return
-he was given a studio in the king’s palace, and in 1656 he was given a
-lucrative position as superintendent of the king’s lodgement. Of his
-painting it is said: “He drew nothing from the antique, and his visit to
-Italy produced no change in his style. He held up the mirror to his age
-alone; all his art was his own—original, national and idiosyncratic.”
-Mengs gives the historical picture—“General Pescara receiving the keys of
-a Flemish citadel” as his masterpiece. The finest pictures of Velasquez
-remain at Madrid.
-
-“Mater Dolorosa,” maˈter dō-lō-rōˈsä. Sorrowing mother.
-
-“Pittore Cavalieresco,” pitˈō-rā cä-välˌee-resˈcō. The Cavalier painter.
-
-“Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn,” remˈbrănt harˈmensz van rīn; “Van Mander,”
-van manˈder. (1548-1606.) A Flemish painter of historical pieces and
-landscapes.
-
-“Houbraken.” A Dutch painter of portraits and historical pieces, who
-lived in the latter part of the seventeenth century.
-
-“Hermann Gerritszoon,” herˈmann ger-ritsˈzoon; “Weddesteeg,” vedˈdes-tēg;
-“Antoine Breedstraat,” anˈto-ny breed-sträˈät; “Saskia van Ulenburch,”
-sasˈki-a van ooˈlen-burk; “Leeuwarden,” lö-warˈden.
-
-P. 445, c. 2.—“Guilders,” gĭldˈer. A Dutch coin worth about 38 cents.
-
-“Walloon,” walˈloon. A native of that part of Flanders between the
-Scheldt and the Lys.
-
-
-AMERICAN LITERATURE.
-
-P. 447, c. 1.—“El Bireh,” el bēˈrä; “Zebroud,” zé-broud; “Aian el
-Haramiyeh,” aiˈan el haˌram-iˈyeh; “Nablous,” naˈblous.
-
-
-UNITED STATES HISTORY.
-
-P. 448, c. 1.—“Youghiogheny,” yŏhˈho-gāˌnĭ.
-
-“Dinwiddy,” din-widˈdie. (1690-1770.) A Scotchman. Governor of Virginia
-from 1752 to 1758.
-
-P. 448, c. 2.—“Le Bœuf,” lŭhˈbŭf; “Du Quesne,” dü-kain.
-
-P. 449, c. 1.—“Braddock.” General Braddock was a Scotchman. He had earned
-his title in the wars in Flanders, and had been sent to America in
-February before his death, which it is believed was caused by one of his
-own men. Braddock gave the order that none of the English should protect
-themselves in the battle of Monongahela behind the trees as the French
-and Indians did. One of the provincial soldiers disobeyed. Braddock saw
-it and struck him with his sword. The brother of the man seeing this,
-shot Braddock in the back.
-
-“St. Croix,” krwâ.
-
-P. 450, c. 1.—“Loudon,” lŏwˈdon. (1705-1782.) He had been appointed
-governor of Virginia, and commander in-chief of the British forces in
-America, but he paid no attention to military affairs. Franklin said
-of him: “He is like little St. George on the sign boards, always on
-horseback, but never goes forward.”
-
-“Abercrombie,” ăbˈer-krŭm-bĭ. (1706-1781.) A Scotchman. He became a
-colonel in the British army in 1746, and came to America in 1756, where
-he held the chief command until the arrival of Loudon. After his defeat
-at Ticonderoga, Abercrombie returned to England and became a member of
-Parliament, where he advocated the obnoxious measures which led to the
-war of the Revolution.
-
-“Ticonderoga,” tī-conˈder-oˌga.
-
-“Lord Howe.” (1724-1758.) He was a member of the British army who came
-to America in the spring of 1758. It is said that with him “the soul of
-the expedition seemed to expire.” His body was taken from Ticonderoga
-to Albany and placed in a vault. When several years after, the remains
-were removed, his hair, which had been cut short as an example for his
-soldiers, had grown to long, flowing, and beautiful locks.
-
-“Wolfe.” (1726-1759.) He distinguished himself in the army when only
-twenty years old. His valor at Louisburg led to his being placed at the
-head of the expedition against Quebec, where he was killed.
-
-“Gabarus,” gabˈa-rus.
-
-P. 450, c. 2.—“Prideaux,” prĭdˈo; “Montmorenci,” mŏntˈmo-rĕnˌsĭ.
-
-“Johnson.” (1715-1774.) An Irishman who came to America in 1738 to take
-care of property in the Mohawk Valley for an uncle. He became a great
-favorite with the Indians, and at the breaking out of the French and
-Indian war was made superintendent of Indian Affairs. His great influence
-kept the Six Nations from any favoring of the French. Johnson was adopted
-into the Mohawk tribe and made a sachem. For his invaluable services
-during the war he was knighted and given a grant of 100,000 acres of land
-north of the Mohawk River.
-
-“Amherst.” (1717-1797.) After his campaign in the north, Amherst was made
-governor of Virginia in 1763, was afterward created a baron, and from
-1778 to 1795 was commander-in-chief.
-
-“Montcalm.” (1712-1759.) He had entered the French army when but 14 years
-old. In the war of the Austrian Secession, and afterward in Italy, he
-gained a high rank. In 1756 he was sent to Canada, where he was feebly
-seconded by the governor in his efforts to preserve the colony to the
-French. A fine monument stands at Quebec erected to both Montcalm and
-Wolfe.
-
-
-
-
-TALK ABOUT BOOKS.
-
-
-After a residence of sixteen years on the Pacific coast, and much
-travel, often by the most primitive methods, through a remote and, at
-the time, little known part of the country, Mrs. Leighton gives us in
-an unpretending little volume[C] some picturesque descriptions, and an
-entertaining narrative of her personal observations and experiences. As
-the work was written from memoranda made at the time, it, of course,
-describes the country and its inhabitants as they appeared fifteen or
-twenty years ago. The rapid immigration of enterprising white people with
-their multiform industries, schools, churches, and all the improvements
-of civilized life has so greatly changed things that a faithful picture,
-now drawn, of some of the localities would be in strong contrast
-with that here sketched for us. With the present railroad facilities,
-the steady stream of emigration to the “new land of promise” will be
-accelerated, and in the next decade the advancement of society there will
-be still more rapid.
-
-A work of rare excellence, and one that meets a demand that has long
-been felt, is Wheeler’s complete analysis of the Bible.[D] The learned
-author was eminently fitted for the work undertaken, every part of
-which witnesses his competency, fidelity and thoroughness. The field
-occupied is not new. We have several other works of the same class
-but none half so satisfactory. The Professor had already wrought with
-gratifying success on his “Analysis and Summary of Herodotus,” and also
-of “Thucydides,” books that present the principal facts narrated by those
-classic historians summarized with great clearness. The analyses in the
-present work present some of the very best examples of concise clearness
-of statement, and the summaries are carefully made. The synthesis of
-the four gospels gives all the principal events and sayings of the
-Savior’s life in chronological order, with explanatory notes. We most
-cordially commend it to all our friends who are able to place it in their
-libraries. If they are Bible students it is full of such information as
-will greatly interest them.
-
-We are glad to know that Dr. J. H. Vincent is publishing in neatly
-ornamented paper covers a series of tracts,[E] full of valuable
-suggestions, and that ought to be read by the young people of all
-fraternizing evangelical churches. They are written from a Methodist
-standpoint, in plain, forcible language, that can not fail to be
-understood. The writer is so well known and honored by Chautauquans, for
-his generous catholicity of spirit, and cordial fellowship with the good
-of all denominations that they will not wonder at his intense abhorrence
-of all bigotry and narrow-mindedness.
-
-Among the many books on temperance that have been written during the
-last two years one of the most useful is “Leaves from the Diary of an
-Old Lawyer.”[F] The materials for the volume are taken directly from
-the author’s experience as a criminal lawyer, and consist of incidents
-whose details he heard in the courts or in the cells of the jails. He
-says: “My experience at the bar has satisfied me that intemperance is the
-direct cause of nearly all the crime that is committed in our country. I
-have been at the bar over thirty years, have been engaged on over four
-thousand criminal cases, and, on mature reflection I am satisfied that
-over three thousand of those cases have originated from drunkenness
-alone, and I believe that a great proportion of the remainder could be
-traced either directly or indirectly to this great source of crime.” With
-such an experience and such a conviction it is needless to add that Mr.
-Richmond has made a strong plea for the temperance cause.
-
-When Messrs. Charles Scribner’s Sons announced that a new and complete
-edition of the writings of Donald G. Mitchell (Ik Marvel) was to be
-sent out from their house, the many lovers of “Reveries of a Bachelor,”
-and “Dream Life,” were heartily pleased. No other books in our American
-Literature have a charm like those two. We all feel a certain personal
-affection for the Bachelor whose fireside dreams and fancies are like our
-own, an affection which makes us turn gladly to anything he writes, and
-we are never disappointed in what we find. To be sure there is nothing in
-“Seven Stories,” or “Wet Days at Edgewood,” or “Dr. Johns,” that gives
-us the delight of our first favorites, but there is much of pleasant
-narrative and wholesome sentiment that drives away our dullness and tones
-up our thoughts. The new edition is very attractive, its cloth binding
-being “something new” in American books, and when the twelve volumes are
-out they will be a valuable addition to our _good_ books.
-
-The first new volume in the new edition of Ik Marvel is a bundle of
-pleasant papers which are put under the apt title of “Bound Together,”[G]
-because, as the author says, “after considerable search I could find
-no more unifying title.” Pleasant reading they are, indeed, on topics
-which are everyday enough and interesting enough to make every reader
-linger over them. Among the essays is the oration on Washington Irving,
-delivered at the centennial celebration of Irving’s birth, held a year
-ago, at Tarrytown; a course of lectures on “Titian and His Times;” “Two
-College Talks;” “Beginnings of an Old Town,” an address delivered upon
-the occasion of the second centennial of the foundation of the town of
-Norwich, and several delightful papers grouped under the general heads of
-“Processions of the Months,” and “In-doors and Out-of-doors.”
-
-There are a great many very suggestive and valuable hints in “My
-House.”[H] If house builders would only follow them our eyes and taste
-would not be so tried now-a-days by the ginger-bready piles of red and
-green peaks and towers and balconies and turrets and cupolas that are
-called houses; houses that are built for style, and not for fitness. It
-is a pity that a few sensible ideas about house building can not be put
-into our heads until we shall build a little nearer Mr. Bunce’s ideal,
-houses whose foundations are deep, and whose walls will stand through
-many generations to come, built for happiness and not to look at. He does
-not try to set forth cheap devices by which “inferior things are made
-to put on the seeming of better things,” nor to show how a house can be
-made pretentious by means of shams, but “how it can be made beautiful
-by choosing and combining intelligently.” “My theme is art, and not
-trickery; my design is to show how to bring about good results by right
-methods, not how to cover up paltry objects by false devices.”
-
-A book giving much needed and valuable information respecting the false
-systems of religion, has been lately issued, by Messrs. Phillips &
-Hunt.[I] It is a book for the times, and published for a purpose worthy
-of the source whence it comes. It contains nine distinct essays, by as
-many Christian scholars, well fitted for the work undertaken; beside
-their eminent ability they have severally been in circumstances most
-favorable to a thorough understanding of the subjects discussed. The
-thoughtful reader will discover in them sufficient grounds for the faith
-indicated by the title, “Doomed Religions,” and that the false systems
-that have for ages enthralled the race give evidence of decay.
-
-
-BOOKS RECEIVED.
-
-“The World’s Cyclopædia and Library of Universal Knowledge.” Compiled by
-Professor H. L. Williams. New York: World Manufacturing Co.
-
-“Biogen; A Speculation on the Origin and Nature of Life.” By Prof. Elliot
-Coues. Boston: Estes & Lauriat. 1884.
-
-“Stories by American Authors;” volumes I. and II. New York: Charles
-Scribner’s Sons. 1884.
-
-“The Last of the Luscombs;” by Helen Pearson Barnard. Boston:
-Congregational Sunday-School and Publishing Society.
-
-“The Retrospect. A Poem in Four Cantos;” by John Ap Thomas Jones.
-Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co. 1884.
-
-“The Opening of a Chestnut Burr.” By E. P. Roe. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.
-
-The Riverside Literature Series: “Mabel Martin and Other Poems.” By John
-Greenleaf Whittier. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin & Co.
-
-[C] Life at Puget Sound, with Sketches of Travel in Washington Territory,
-British Columbia, Oregon and California. 1865-1881. By Caroline C.
-Leighton. Boston: Lee & Shepard, publishers, 1884.
-
-[D] Wheeler’s Complete Analysis of the Bible. A Summary of Old and New
-Testament History. By J. T. Wheeler, F. R. G. S., Philadelphia: Thayer,
-Merriam & Co. 1882.
-
-[E] The Holy Catholic Church. The Antiquity of Methodism. The Episcopal
-Church. By J. H. Vincent, D.D. Phillips & Hunt, New York: 1884.
-
-[F] Leaves from the Diary of an Old Lawyer. By A. B. Richmond, Esq.,
-Meadville, Pa. Meadville Publishing House. 1883.
-
-[G] Bound Together: A Sheaf of Papers. By the author of “Wet Days at
-Edgewood,” “Reveries of a Bachelor,” etc. New York: Charles Scribner’s
-Sons. 1884.
-
-[H] My House; An Ideal. By Oliver B. Bunce. New York: Charles Scribner’s
-Sons. 1884.
-
-[I] Doomed Religions. A series of essays on Great Religions of the World.
-Edited by Rev. J. M. Reid, D.D., LL. D. New York: Phillips & Hunt. 1884.
-
- * * * * *
-
-[Illustration: ROYAL BAKING POWDER
-
-Absolutely Pure.]
-
-This powder never varies. A marvel of purity, strength and wholesomeness.
-More economical than the ordinary kinds, and can not be sold in
-competition with the multitude of low test, short weight, alum or
-phosphate powders. _Sold only in cans._ ROYAL BAKING POWDER CO., 106 Wall
-Street, New York.
-
- * * * * *
-
-Transcriber’s Notes:
-
-Obvious punctuation errors repaired.
-
-Page 438, “Kineas” changed to “Cineas” throughout, to match the heading,
-the note, and the prior issue of THE CHAUTAUQUAN referenced in the note.
-
-Pages 440-442, Sunday Readings: date headings changed from the dates of
-the Sundays in April 1884, to the dates of the Sundays in May 1884.
-
-Page 444, “DIJCK” changed to “DYCK” (heading: ANTOON VAN DYCK)
-
-Page 447, “phase” changed to “phrase” (a joyous phrase)
-
-Page 450, “loses” changed to “losses” (their losses at Ticonderoga)
-
-Page 461, “Jeussen” changed to “Jenssen” (Hans Jenssen, in far away
-Norway)
-
-Page 480, “Brittanica” changed to “Britannica” (Lübke, the Britannica,
-and)
-
-Page 483, “Vermamdois” changed to “Vermandois” (Hugh of Vermandois)
-
-Page 484, “suceessful” changed to “successful” (successful or happy
-living)
-
-Page 490, “Aquatania” changed to “Aquitania” (governor of Aquitania)
-
-Page 492, “owned” changed to “owed” (whose brethren owed allegiance)
-
-Page 494, “Perkheimer” changed to “Pirkheimer” (“Pirkheimer,” pirkˈhi-mer)
-
-Page 494, “Francesko Spforza” changed to “Francesco Sforza” (“Francesco
-Sforza,” fran-chĕsˈko sfortˈsä)
-
-Page 494, “Paola” changed to “Paolo“ (Paolo Veronese)
-
-Page 494, “Gongaza” and pronunciation “gon-gäˈzä“ changed to “Gonzaga“
-and “gon-zäˈgä” (“Vincenzo Gonzaga,” vin-senˈzo gon-zäˈgä)
-
-Page 495, “Pescarra” changed to “Pescara” (General Pescara receiving the
-keys)
-
-Page 495, “English” changed to “Indians” (as the French and Indians did)
-
-Page 495, “Louisberg” changed to “Louisburg” (His valor at Louisburg)
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Chautauquan, Vol. 04, May 1884,
-No. 8, by The Chautauquan Literary and Scientific Circle
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE CHAUTAUQUAN, MAY 1884 ***
-
-***** This file should be named 55158-0.txt or 55158-0.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/5/5/1/5/55158/
-
-Produced by Emmy, Juliet Sutherland and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
-specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
-eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
-for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
-performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
-away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
-not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
-trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country outside the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
- are located before using this ebook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
-Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
-mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
-volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
-locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
-Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
-date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
-official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
-
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-