summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/54897-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/54897-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/54897-0.txt10610
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10610 deletions
diff --git a/old/54897-0.txt b/old/54897-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index e92fa9e..0000000
--- a/old/54897-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,10610 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of Preliminary Discourse on the Study of
-Natural Philosophy, by John F. W. Herschel
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
-other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
-the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
-to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
-
-Title: Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy
-
-Author: John F. W. Herschel
-
-Release Date: June 12, 2017 [EBook #54897]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE--NATURAL PHILOSOPHY ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Sonya Schermann, Charlie Howard, and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
-file was produced from images generously made available
-by The Internet Archive)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE_
- on the Study of
- NATURAL PHILOSOPHY
-
- BY
- SIR JOHN F. W. HERSCHEL, BART. K.H.
- _M.A.--D.C.L.--F.R.S.L&E.--M.R.I.A.--F.R.A.S.
- F.G.S.--M.C.U.P.S.--&c. &c._
-
-
- NEW EDITION.
- 1851.
-
-[Illustration:
-
- _H. Corbould del._ _E. Finden. sculp._
-
-NATURÆ MINISTER ET INTERPRES.]
-
-
- NEW EDITION.
-
- London:
- PRINTED FOR LONGMAN, BROWN, GREEN & LONGMANS, PATERNOSTER ROW
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS.
-
-
- Page
- PART I.
-
- OF THE GENERAL NATURE AND ADVANTAGES OF THE STUDY OF THE
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES.
-
-
- CHAP. I.
-
- Of Man regarded as a Creature of Instinct, of Reason, and
- Speculation.--General Influence of Scientific Pursuits on
- the Mind. 1
-
-
- CHAP. II.
-
- Of abstract Science as a Preparation for the Study of Physics.--
- A profound Acquaintance with it not indispensable for a
- clear Understanding of Physical Laws.--How a Conviction
- of their Truth may be obtained without it.--Instances.--
- Further Division of the Subject. 18
-
-
- CHAP. III.
-
- Of the Nature and Objects, immediate and collateral, of
- Physical Science, as regarded in itself, and in its
- Application to the practical Purposes of Life, and its
- Influence on the Well-being and Progress of Society. 35
-
-
- PART II.
-
- OF THE PRINCIPLES ON WHICH PHYSICAL SCIENCE RELIES FOR ITS
- SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTION, AND THE RULES BY WHICH A SYSTEMATIC
- EXAMINATION OF NATURE SHOULD BE CONDUCTED, WITH ILLUSTRATIONS
- OF THEIR INFLUENCE AS EXEMPLIFIED IN THE HISTORY OF ITS
- PROGRESS.
-
-
- CHAP. I.
-
- Of Experience as the Source of our Knowledge.--Of the
- Dismissal of Prejudices.--Of the Evidence of our Senses. 75
-
-
- CHAP. II.
-
- Of the Analysis of Phenomena. 85
-
-
- CHAP. III.
-
- Of the State of Physical Science in General, previous to the
- Age of Galileo and Bacon. 104
-
-
- CHAP. IV.
-
- Of the Observation of Facts and the Collection of Instances. 118
-
-
- CHAP. V.
-
- Of the Classification of Natural Objects and Phenomena, and of
- Nomenclature. 135
-
-
- CHAP. VI.
-
- Of the First Stage of Induction.--The Discovery of Proximate
- Causes, and Laws of the lowest Degree of Generality, and
- their Verification. 144
-
-
- CHAP. VII.
-
- Of the higher Degrees of Inductive Generalization, and of the
- Formation and Verification of Theories. 190
-
-
- PART III.
-
- OF THE SUBDIVISION OF PHYSICS INTO DISTINCT BRANCHES, AND THEIR
- MUTUAL RELATIONS.
-
-
- CHAP. I.
-
- Of the Phenomena of Force, and of the Constitution of Natural
- Bodies. 221
-
-
- CHAP. II.
-
- Of the Communication of Motion through Bodies.--Of Sound and
- Light. 246
-
-
- CHAP. III.
-
- Of Cosmical Phenomena. 265
-
-
- CHAP. IV.
-
- Of the Examination of the material Constituents of the World.
- 290
-
-
- CHAP. V.
-
- Of the Imponderable Forms of Matter. 310
-
-
- CHAP. VI.
-
- Of the Causes of the actual rapid Advance of the Physical
- Sciences compared with their Progress at an earlier Period. 347
-
-
-
-
- “In primis, hominis est propria VERI inquisitio atque
- investigatio. Itaque cum sumus negotiis necessariis, curisque
- vacui, tum avemus aliquid videre, audire, ac dicere,
- cognitionemque rerum, aut occultarum aut admirabilium, ad benè
- beatéque vivendum necessariam ducimus;--ex quo intelligitur,
- quod VERUM, simplex, sincerumque sit, id esse naturæe hominis
- aptissimum. Huic veri videndi cupiditati adjuncta est appetitio
- quædam principatûs, ut nemini parere animus benè a naturâ
- informatus velit, nisi præcipienti, aut docenti, aut utilitatis
- causa justè et legitimè imperanti: ex quo animi magnitudo
- existit, et humanararum rerum contemtio.”
-
- CICERO, DE OFFICIIS, Lib. 1. § 13.
-
-
- Before all other things, man is distinguished by his pursuit
- and investigation of TRUTH. And hence, when free from needful
- business and cares, we delight to see, to hear, and to
- communicate, and consider a knowledge of many admirable and
- abstruse things necessary to the good conduct and happiness of
- our lives: whence it is clear that whatsoever is TRUE, simple,
- and direct, the same is most congenial to our nature as men.
- Closely allied with this earnest longing to see and know the
- truth, is a kind of dignified and princely sentiment which
- forbids a mind, naturally well constituted, to submit its
- faculties to any but those who announce it in precept or in
- doctrine, or to yield obedience to any orders but such as are
- at once just, lawful, and founded on utility. From this source
- spring greatness of mind and contempt of worldly advantages and
- troubles.
-
-
-
-
- PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE
- ON
- THE STUDY
- OF
- NATURAL PHILOSOPHY.
-
-
-
-
- PART I.
-
- OF THE GENERAL NATURE AND ADVANTAGES OF THE STUDY OF
- THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER I.
-
- OF MAN REGARDED AS A CREATURE OF INSTINCT, OF REASON, AND
- SPECULATION.--GENERAL INFLUENCE OF SCIENTIFIC PURSUITS ON THE
- MIND.
-
-
-(1.) The situation of man on the globe he inhabits, and over which he
-has obtained the control, is in many respects exceedingly remarkable.
-Compared with its other denizens, he seems, if we regard only his
-physical constitution, in almost every respect their inferior, and
-equally unprovided for the supply of his natural wants and his defence
-against the innumerable enemies which surround him. No other animal
-passes so large a portion of its existence in a state of absolute
-helplessness, or falls in old age into such protracted and lamentable
-imbecility. To no other warm-blooded animal has nature denied that
-indispensable covering without which the vicissitudes of a temperate
-and the rigours of a cold climate are equally insupportable; and to
-scarcely any has she been so sparing in external weapons, whether for
-attack or defence. Destitute alike of speed to avoid and of arms to
-repel the aggressions of his voracious foes; tenderly susceptible of
-atmospheric influences; and unfitted for the coarse aliments which the
-earth affords spontaneously during at least two thirds of the year,
-even in temperate climates,--man, if abandoned to mere instinct, would
-be of all creatures the most destitute and miserable. Distracted by
-terror and goaded by famine; driven to the most abject expedients
-for concealment from his enemies, and to the most cowardly devices
-for the seizure and destruction of his nobler prey, his existence
-would be one continued subterfuge or stratagem;--his dwelling would
-be in dens of the earth, in clefts of rocks, or in the hollows of
-trees; his food worms, and the lower reptiles, or such few and crude
-productions of the soil as his organs could be brought to assimilate,
-varied with occasional relics, mangled by more powerful beasts of prey,
-or contemned by their more pampered choice. Remarkable only for the
-absence of those powers and qualities which obtain for other animals a
-degree of security and respect, he would be disregarded by some, and
-hunted down by others, till after a few generations his species would
-become altogether extinct, or, at best, would be restricted to a few
-islands in tropical regions, where the warmth of the climate, the
-paucity of enemies, and the abundance of vegetable food, might permit
-it to linger.
-
-(2.) Yet man is the undisputed lord of the creation. The strongest
-and fiercest of his fellow-creatures,--the whale, the elephant, the
-eagle, and the tiger,--are slaughtered by him to supply his most
-capricious wants, or tamed to do him service, or imprisoned to make
-him sport. The spoils of all nature are in daily requisition for his
-most common uses, yielded with more or less readiness, or wrested with
-reluctance, from the mine, the forest, the ocean, and the air. Such
-are the first fruits of reason. Were they the only or the principal
-ones, were the mere acquisition of power over the materials, and the
-less gifted animals which surround us, and the consequent increase
-of our external comforts, and our means of preservation and sensual
-enjoyment, the sum of the privileges which the possession of this
-faculty conferred, we should after all have little to plume ourselves
-upon. But this is so far from being the case, that every one who passes
-his life in tolerable ease and comfort, or rather whose whole time
-is not anxiously consumed in providing the absolute necessaries of
-existence, is conscious of wants and cravings in which the senses have
-no part, of a series of pains and pleasures totally distinct in kind
-from any which the infliction of bodily misery or the gratification
-of bodily appetites has ever afforded him; and if he has experienced
-these pleasures and these pains in any degree of intensity, he will
-readily admit them to hold a much higher rank, and to deserve much
-more attention, than the former class. Independent of the pleasures
-of fancy and imagination, and social converse, man is constituted a
-speculative being; he contemplates the world, and the objects around
-him, not with a passive, indifferent gaze, as a set of phenomena in
-which he has no further interest than as they affect his immediate
-situation, and can be rendered subservient to his comfort, but as
-a system disposed with order and design. He approves and feels the
-highest admiration for the harmony of its parts, the skill and
-efficiency of its contrivances. Some of these which he can best trace
-and understand he attempts to imitate, and finds that to a certain
-extent, though rudely and imperfectly, he can succeed,--in others, that
-although he can comprehend the nature of the contrivance, he is totally
-destitute of all means of imitation;--while in others, again, and those
-evidently the most important, though he sees the effect produced,
-yet the means by which it is done are alike beyond his knowledge
-and his control. Thus he is led to the conception of a Power and an
-Intelligence superior to his own, and adequate to the production and
-maintenance of all that he sees in nature,--a Power and Intelligence to
-which he may well apply the term infinite, since he not only sees no
-actual limit to the instances in which they are manifested, but finds,
-on the contrary, that the farther he enquires, and the wider his sphere
-of observation extends, they continually open upon him in increasing
-abundance; and that as the study of one prepares him to understand and
-appreciate another, refinement follows on refinement, wonder on wonder,
-till his faculties become bewildered in admiration, and his intellect
-falls back on itself in utter hopelessness of arriving at an end.
-
-(3.) When from external objects he turns his view upon himself, on his
-own vital and intellectual faculties, he finds that he possesses a
-power of examining and analysing his own nature to a certain extent,
-but no farther. In his corporeal frame he is sensible of a power to
-communicate a certain moderate amount of motion to himself and other
-objects; that this power depends on his will, and that its exertion
-can be suspended or increased at pleasure within certain limits; but
-_how_ his will acts on his limbs he has no consciousness: and whence he
-derives the power he thus exercises, there is nothing to assure him,
-however he may long to know. His senses, too, inform him of a multitude
-of particulars respecting the external world, and he perceives an
-apparatus by which impressions from without may be transmitted, as a
-sort of signals to the interior of his person, and ultimately to his
-brain, wherein he is obscurely sensible that the thinking, feeling,
-reasoning being he calls _himself_, more especially resides; but by
-what means he becomes conscious of these impressions, and what is the
-nature of the immediate communication between that inward sentient
-being, and that machinery, his outward man, he has not the slightest
-conception.
-
-(4.) Again, when he contemplates still more attentively the thoughts,
-acts, and passions of this his sentient intelligent self, he finds,
-indeed, that he can remember, and by the aid of memory can compare
-and discriminate, can judge and resolve, and, above all, that he is
-irresistibly impelled, from the perception of any phenomenon without
-or within him, to infer the existence of something prior which stands
-to it in the relation of a _cause_, without which it would not be, and
-that this knowledge of causes and their consequences is what, in almost
-every instance, determines his choice and will, in cases where he is
-nevertheless conscious of perfect freedom to act or not to act. He
-finds, too, that it is in his power to acquire more or less knowledge
-of causes and effects according to the degree of attention he bestows
-upon them, which attention is again in great measure a voluntary act;
-and often when his choice has been decided on imperfect knowledge or
-insufficient attention, he finds reason to correct his judgment, though
-perhaps too late to influence his decision by after consideration. A
-world within him is thus opened to his intellectual view, abounding
-with phenomena and relations, and of the highest immediate interest.
-But while he cannot help perceiving that the insight he is enabled to
-obtain into this internal sphere of thought and feeling is in reality
-the source of all his power, the very fountain of his predominance over
-external nature, he yet feels himself capable of entering only very
-imperfectly into these recesses of his own bosom, and analysing the
-operations of his mind,--in this as in all other things, in short, “_a
-being darkly wise_;” seeing that all the longest life and most vigorous
-intellect can give him power to discover by his own research, or time
-to know by availing himself of that of others, serves only to place
-him on the very frontier of knowledge, and afford a distant glimpse
-of boundless realms beyond, where no human thought has penetrated,
-but which yet he is sure must be no less familiarly known to that
-Intelligence which he traces throughout creation than the most obvious
-truths which he himself daily applies to his most trifling purposes.
-Is it wonderful that a being so constituted should first encourage a
-hope, and by degrees acknowledge an assurance, that his intellectual
-existence will not terminate with the dissolution of his corporeal
-frame, but rather that in a future state of being, disencumbered of
-a thousand obstructions which his present situation throws in his
-way, endowed with acuter senses, and higher faculties, he shall drink
-deep at that fountain of beneficent wisdom for which the slight taste
-obtained on earth has given him so keen a relish?
-
-(5.) Nothing, then, can be more unfounded than the objection which has
-been taken, _in limine_, by persons, well meaning perhaps, certainly
-narrow-minded, against the study of natural philosophy, and indeed
-against all science,--that it fosters in its cultivators an undue and
-overweening self-conceit, leads them to doubt the immortality of the
-soul, and to scoff at revealed religion. Its natural effect, we may
-confidently assert, on every well constituted mind is and must be
-the direct contrary. No doubt, the testimony of natural reason, on
-whatever exercised, must of necessity stop short of those truths which
-it is the object of revelation to make known; but, while it places
-the existence and principal attributes of a Deity on such grounds as
-to render doubt impossible, it unquestionably opposes no natural or
-necessary obstacle to further progress: on the contrary, by cherishing
-as a vital principle an unbounded spirit of enquiry, and ardency of
-expectation, it unfetters the mind from prejudices of every kind, and
-leaves it open and free to every impression of a higher nature which
-it is susceptible of receiving, guarding only against enthusiasm and
-self-deception by a habit of strict investigation, but encouraging,
-rather than suppressing, every thing that can offer a prospect or a
-hope beyond the present obscure and unsatisfactory state. The character
-of the true philosopher is to hope all things not impossible, and to
-believe all things not unreasonable. He who has seen obscurities which
-appeared impenetrable in physical and mathematical science suddenly
-dispelled, and the most barren and unpromising fields of enquiry
-converted, as if by inspiration, into rich and inexhaustible springs
-of knowledge and power on a simple change of our point of view, or
-by merely bringing to bear on them some principle which it never
-occurred before to try, will surely be the very last to acquiesce in
-any dispiriting prospects of either the present or future destinies of
-mankind; while, on the other hand, the boundless views of intellectual
-and moral as well as material relations which open on him on all hands
-in the course of these pursuits, the knowledge of the trivial place he
-occupies in the scale of creation, and the sense continually pressed
-upon him of his own weakness and incapacity to suspend or modify the
-slightest movement of the machinery he sees in action around him, must
-effectually convince him that humility of pretension, no less than
-confidence of hope, is what best becomes his character.
-
-(6.) But while we thus vindicate the study of natural philosophy from a
-charge at one time formidable, owing to the pertinacity and acrimony
-with which it was urged, and still occasionally brought forward to
-the distress and disgust of every well constituted mind, we must
-take care that the testimony afforded by science to religion, be its
-extent or value what it may, shall be at least independent, unbiassed,
-and spontaneous. We do not here allude to such reasoners as would
-make all nature bend to their narrow interpretations of obscure and
-difficult passages in the sacred writings: such a course might well
-become the persecutors of Galileo and the other bigots of the fifteenth
-and sixteenth centuries, but can only be adopted by dreamers in the
-present age. But, without going these lengths, it is no uncommon thing
-to find persons, earnestly attached to science and anxious for its
-promotion, who yet manifest a morbid sensibility on points of this
-kind,--who exult and applaud when any fact starts up explanatory (as
-they suppose) of some scriptural allusion and who feel pained and
-disappointed when the general course of discovery in any department
-of science runs wide of the notions with which particular passages in
-the Bible may have impressed themselves. To persons of such a frame of
-mind it ought to suffice to remark, on the one hand, that truth can
-never be opposed to truth, and, on the other, that error is only to be
-effectually confounded by searching deep and tracing it to its source.
-Nevertheless, it were much to be wished that such persons, estimable
-and excellent as many of them are, before they throw the weight of
-their applause or discredit into the scale of scientific opinion on
-such grounds, would reflect, first, that the credit and respectability
-of _any_ evidence may be destroyed by tampering with its _honesty_;
-and, secondly, that this very disposition of mind implies a lurking
-mistrust in its own principles, since the grand and indeed only
-character of truth is its capability of enduring the test of universal
-experience, and coming unchanged out of every possible form of _fair_
-discussion.
-
-(7.) But if science may be vilified by representing it as opposed to
-religion, or trammelled by mistaken notions of the danger of free
-enquiry, there is yet another mode by which it may be degraded from
-its native dignity, and that is by placing it in the light of a mere
-appendage to and caterer for our pampered appetites. The question
-“_cui bono_” to what practical end and advantage do your researches
-tend? is one which the speculative philosopher who loves knowledge
-for its own sake, and enjoys, as a rational being should enjoy, the
-mere contemplation of harmonious and mutually dependent truths, can
-seldom hear without a sense of humiliation. He feels that there is a
-lofty and disinterested pleasure in his speculations which ought to
-exempt them from such questioning; communicating as they do to his own
-mind the purest happiness (after the exercise of the benevolent and
-moral feelings) of which human nature is susceptible, and tending to
-the injury of no one, he might surely allege _this_ as a sufficient
-and direct reply to those who, having themselves little capacity, and
-less relish for intellectual pursuits, are constantly repeating upon
-him this enquiry. But if he can bring himself to descend from this
-high but fair ground, and justify himself, his pursuits, and his
-pleasures in the eyes of those around him, he has only to point to the
-history of all science, where speculations, apparently unprofitable,
-have, in innumerable instances, been those from which great practical
-applications have emanated. What, for instance, could be more so than
-the dry speculations of the ancient geometers on the properties of the
-conic sections, or than the dreams of Kepler (as they would naturally
-appear to his contemporaries) about the numerical harmonies of the
-universe? Yet these are the steps by which we have risen to a knowledge
-of the elliptic motions of the planets and the law of gravitation,
-with all its splendid theoretical consequences, and its inestimable
-practical results. The ridicule attached to “_Swing-swangs_” in
-Hooke’s time[1] did not prevent him from reviving the proposal of the
-_pendulum_ as a standard of measure, since so effectually wrought into
-practice by the genius and perseverance of Captain Kater;--nor did
-that which Boyle encountered in his researches on the elasticity and
-pressure of the air act as any obstacle to the train of discovery which
-terminated in the steam-engine. The dreams of the alchemists led them
-on in the path of experiment, and drew attention to the wonders of
-chemistry, while they brought their advocates (it must be admitted) to
-merited contempt and ruin. But in this case it was moral dereliction
-which gave to ridicule a weight and power not necessarily or naturally
-belonging to it: but among the alchemists were men of superior minds,
-who reasoned while they worked, and who, not content to grope always in
-the dark, and blunder on their object, sought carefully in the observed
-nature of their agents for guides in their pursuit. To these we owe the
-creation of experimental philosophy.
-
-(8.) Not that it is meant, by any thing above said, to assert
-that there is no such thing as a great or a little in speculative
-philosophy, or to place the solution of an enigma on a level with
-the developement of a law of nature, still less to adopt the homely
-definition of Smith[2], that a philosopher is a person whose trade it
-is to do nothing, and speculate on every thing. The speculations of
-the natural philosopher, however remote they may for a time lead him
-from beaten tracks and every-day uses, being grounded in the realities
-of nature, have all, of necessity, a practical application,--nay
-more, such applications form the very criterions of their truth,
-they afford the readiest and completest verifications of his
-theories;--verifications which he will no more neglect to test them by
-than an arithmetician would omit to _prove_ his sums, or a cautious
-geometer to try his general theorems by particular cases.[3]
-
-(9.) After all, however, it must be confessed, that to minds
-unacquainted with science, and unused to consider the mutual
-dependencies of its various branches, there is something neither
-unnatural nor altogether blamable in the ready occurrence of this
-question of direct advantage. It requires some habit of abstraction,
-some penetration of the mind with a tincture of scientific enquiry,
-some conviction of the value of those estimable and treasured
-principles which lie concealed in the most common and homely
-facts,--some experience, in fine, of success in developing and placing
-them in evidence, announcing them in precise terms, and applying them
-to the explanation of other facts of a less familiar character, or to
-the accomplishment of some obviously useful purpose:--to cure the mind
-of this tendency to rush at once upon its object, to undervalue the
-means in over-estimation of the end, and while gazing too intently at
-the goal which alone it has been accustomed to desire, to lose sight
-of the richness and variety of the prospects that offer themselves on
-either hand on the road.
-
-(10.) We must never forget that it is principles, not phenomena,--the
-interpretation, not the mere knowledge of facts,--which are the
-objects of enquiry to the natural philosopher. As truth is single,
-and consistent with itself, a principle may be as completely and as
-plainly elucidated by the most familiar and simple fact, as by the
-most imposing and uncommon phenomenon. The colours which glitter on
-a soap-bubble are the immediate consequence of a principle the most
-important from the variety of phenomena it explains, and the most
-beautiful, from its simplicity and compendious neatness, in the whole
-science of optics. If the nature of periodical colours can be made
-intelligible by the contemplation of such a trivial object, from that
-moment it becomes a noble instrument in the eye of correct judgment;
-and to blow a large, regular, and durable soap-bubble may become the
-serious and praiseworthy endeavour of a sage, while children stand
-round and scoff, or children of a larger growth hold up their hands
-in astonishment at such waste of time and trouble. To the natural
-philosopher there is no natural object unimportant or trifling. From
-the least of nature’s works he may learn the greatest lessons. The fall
-of an apple to the ground may raise his thoughts to the laws which
-govern the revolutions of the planets in their orbits; or the situation
-of a pebble may afford him evidence of the state of the globe he
-inhabits, myriads of ages ago, before his species became its denizens.
-
-(11.) And this is, in fact, one of the great sources of delight
-which the study of natural science imparts to its votaries. A mind
-which has once imbibed a taste for scientific enquiry, and has
-learnt the habit of applying its principles readily to the cases
-which occur, has within itself an inexhaustible source of pure and
-exciting contemplations:--one would think that Shakspeare had such
-a mind in view when he describes a contemplative man as finding all
-nature eloquent--the very trees, the brooks, and the stones reading
-to him lessons of deep and serious import. Accustomed to trace the
-operation of general causes, and the exemplification of general laws,
-in circumstances where the uninformed and unenquiring eye perceives
-neither novelty nor beauty, he walks in the midst of wonders: every
-object which falls in his way elucidates some principle, affords some
-instruction, and impresses him with a sense of harmony and order. Nor
-is it a mere passive pleasure which is thus communicated. A thousand
-questions are continually arising in his mind, a thousand subjects of
-enquiry presenting themselves, which keep his faculties in constant
-exercise, and his thoughts perpetually on the wing, so that lassitude
-is excluded from his life, and that craving after artificial excitement
-and dissipation of mind, which leads so many into frivolous, unworthy,
-and destructive pursuits, is altogether eradicated from his bosom.
-
-(12.) It is not one of the least advantages of these pursuits, which,
-however, they possess in common with every class of intellectual
-pleasures, that they are altogether independent of external
-circumstances, and are to be enjoyed in every situation in which a man
-can be placed in life. The highest degrees of worldly prosperity are so
-far from being incompatible with them, that they supply inestimable
-advantages for their pursuit, and that sort of fresh and renewed relish
-which arises partly from the sense of contrast, partly from experience
-of the peculiar pre-eminence they possess over the pleasures of sense
-in their capability of unlimited increase and continual repetition
-without satiety or distaste. They may be enjoyed, too, in the intervals
-of the most active business; and the calm and dispassionate interest
-with which they fill the mind renders them a most delightful retreat
-from the agitations and dissensions of the world, and from the conflict
-of passions, prejudices, and interests in which the man of business
-finds himself involved. There is something in the contemplation of
-general laws which powerfully induces and persuades us to merge
-individual feeling, and to commit ourselves unreservedly to their
-disposal; while the observation of the calm, energetic regularity of
-nature, the immense scale of her operations, and the certainty with
-which her ends are attained, tends, irresistibly, to tranquillize and
-re-assure the mind, and render it less accessible to repining, selfish,
-and turbulent emotions. And this it does, not by debasing our nature
-into weak compliances and abject submission to circumstances, but by
-filling us, as from an inward spring, with a sense of nobleness and
-power which enables us to rise superior to them; by showing us our
-strength and innate dignity, and by calling upon us for the exercise
-of those powers and faculties by which we are susceptible of the
-comprehension of so much greatness, and which form, as it were, a link
-between ourselves and the best and noblest benefactors of our species,
-with whom we hold communion in thoughts and participate in discoveries
-which have raised them above their fellow-mortals, and brought them
-nearer to their Creator.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. II.
-
- OF ABSTRACT SCIENCE AS A PREPARATION FOR THE STUDY OF PHYSICS.--A
- PROFOUND ACQUAINTANCE WITH IT NOT INDISPENSABLE FOR A CLEAR
- UNDERSTANDING OF PHYSICAL LAWS.--HOW A CONVICTION OF THEIR TRUTH
- MAY BE OBTAINED WITHOUT IT.--INSTANCES.--FURTHER DIVISION OF THE
- SUBJECT.
-
-
-(13.) Science is the knowledge of many, orderly and methodically
-digested and arranged, so as to become attainable by one. The knowledge
-of reasons and their conclusions constitutes _abstract_, that of causes
-and their effects, and of the laws of nature, _natural science_.
-
-(14.) Abstract science is independent of a system of nature,--of a
-creation,--of every thing, in short, except memory, thought, and
-reason. Its objects are, first, those primary existences and relations
-which we cannot even conceive not to _be_, such as space, time,
-number, order, &c.; and, secondly, those artificial forms, or symbols,
-which thought has the power of creating for itself at pleasure, and
-substituting as representatives, by the aid of memory, for combinations
-of those primary objects and of its own conceptions,--either to
-facilitate the act of reasoning respecting them, or as convenient
-deposits of its own conclusions, or for their communication to others.
-Such are, first, _language_, oral or written; its conventional forms,
-which constitute grammar, and the rules for its use in argument,
-in which consists the logic of the schools; secondly, _notation_,
-which, applied to _number_, is _arithmetic_,--and, to the more general
-relations of abstract quantity or order, is _algebra_; and, thirdly,
-that higher kind of logic, which teaches us to use our reason in the
-most advantageous manner for the discovery of truth; which points
-out the criterions by which we may be sure we have attained it; and
-which, by detecting the sources of error, and exposing the haunts where
-fallacies are apt to lurk, at once warns us of their danger, and shows
-us how to avoid them. This greater logic may be termed _rational_[4];
-while, to that inferior department which is conversant with words
-alone, the epithet _verbal_[5] may, for distinction, be applied.
-
-(15.) A certain moderate degree of acquaintance with abstract science
-is highly desirable to every one who would make any considerable
-progress in physics. As the universe exists in time and place; and as
-motion, velocity, quantity, number, and order, are main elements of
-our knowledge of external things and their changes, an acquaintance
-with these, abstractedly considered, (that is to say, independent of
-any consideration of the particular things moved, measured, counted,
-or arranged,) must evidently be a useful preparation for the more
-complex study of nature. But there is yet another recommendation of
-such sciences as a preparation for the study of natural philosophy.
-Their objects are so definite, and our notions of them so distinct,
-that we can reason about them with an assurance, that the words and
-signs used in our reasonings are full and true representatives of the
-things signified; and, consequently, that when we use language or signs
-in argument, we neither, by their use, introduce extraneous notions,
-nor exclude any part of the case before us from consideration. For
-example: the words space, square, circle, a hundred, &c., convey to
-the mind notions so complete in themselves, and so distinct from every
-thing else, that we are sure when we use them we know and have in
-view the whole of our own meaning. It is widely different with words
-expressing natural objects and mixed relations. Take, for instance,
-iron. Different persons attach very different ideas to this word. One
-who has never heard of magnetism has a widely different notion of
-_iron_ from one in the contrary predicament. The vulgar, who regard
-this metal as incombustible, and the chemist, who sees it burn with the
-utmost fury, and who has other reasons for regarding it as one of the
-most combustible bodies in nature;--the poet, who uses it as an emblem
-of rigidity; and the smith and engineer, in whose hands it is plastic,
-and moulded like wax into every form;--the jailer, who prizes it as
-an obstruction, and the electrician, who sees in it only a channel of
-open communication by which that most impassable of obstacles, the
-air, may be traversed by his imprisoned fluid, have all different, and
-all imperfect, notions of the same word. The meaning of such a term
-is like a rainbow--every body sees a different one, and all maintain
-it to be the same. So it is with nearly all our terms of sense. Some
-are indefinite, as hard or soft, light or heavy (terms which were at
-one time the sources of innumerable mistakes and controversies); some
-excessively complex, as man, life, instinct. But, what is worst of
-all, some, nay most, have two or three meanings; sufficiently distinct
-from each other to make a proposition true in one sense and false in
-another, or even false altogether; yet not distinct enough to keep us
-from confounding them in the process by which we arrived at it, or
-to enable us immediately to recognise the fallacy when led to it by
-a train of reasoning, each step of which we _think_ we have examined
-and approved. Surely those who thus attach two senses to one word, or
-superadd a new meaning to an old one, act as absurdly as colonists who
-distribute themselves over the world, naming every place they come
-to by the names of those they have left, till all distinctions of
-geographical nomenclature are confounded, and till we are unable to
-decide whether an occurrence stated to have happened at Windsor took
-place in Europe, America, or Australia.[6]
-
-(16.) It is, in fact, in this double or incomplete sense of words that
-we must look for the origin of a very large portion of the errors
-into which we fall. Now, the study of the abstract sciences, such as
-arithmetic, geometry, algebra, &c., while they afford scope for the
-exercise of reasoning about objects that are, or, at least, may be
-conceived to be, external to us; yet, being free from these sources
-of error and mistake, accustom us to the strict use of language as
-an instrument of reason, and by familiarizing us, in our progress
-towards truth, to walk uprightly and straight-forward on firm ground,
-give us that proper and dignified carriage of mind which could never
-be acquired by having always to pick our steps among obstructions
-and loose fragments, or to steady them in the reeling tempest of
-conflicting meanings.
-
-(17.) But there is yet another point of view under which some
-acquaintance with abstract science may be regarded as highly desirable
-in general education, if not indispensably necessary, to impress on us
-the distinction between strict and vague reasoning, to show us what
-demonstration really _is_, and to give us thereby a full and intimate
-sense of the nature and strength of the evidence on which our knowledge
-of the actual system of nature, and the laws of natural phenomena,
-rests. For this purpose, however, a very moderate acquaintance with the
-more elementary branches of mathematics may suffice. The chain is laid
-before us, and every link is submitted to our unreserved examination,
-if we have patience and inclination to enter on such detail. Hundreds
-have gone through it, and will continue to do so; but, for the
-generality of mankind, it is enough to satisfy themselves of the
-solidity and adamantine texture of its materials, and the unreserved
-exposure of its weakest, as well as its strongest, parts. If, however,
-we content ourselves with this general view of the matter, we must be
-content also to take on trust, that is, on the authority of those who
-have examined deeper, every conclusion which cannot be made apparent
-to our senses. Now, among these there are many so very surprising,
-indeed apparently so extravagant, that it is quite impossible for any
-enquiring mind to rest contented with a mere hearsay statement of
-them,--we feel irresistibly impelled to enquire further into their
-truth. What mere assertion will make any man believe, that in one
-second of time, in one beat of the pendulum of a clock, a ray of light
-travels over 192,000 miles, and would therefore perform the tour of the
-world in about the same time that it requires to wink with our eyelids,
-and in much less than a swift runner occupies in taking a single
-stride? What mortal can be made to believe, without demonstration, that
-the sun is almost a million times larger than the earth? and that,
-although so remote from us, that a cannon ball shot directly towards
-it, and maintaining its full speed, would be twenty years in reaching
-it, it yet affects the earth by its attraction in an inappreciable
-instant of time?--a closeness of union of which we can form but a
-feeble, and totally inadequate, idea, by comparing it to any material
-connection; since the communication of an impulse to such a distance,
-by any solid intermedium we are acquainted with, would require, not
-moments, but whole years. And when, with pain and difficulty we have
-strained our imagination to conceive a distance so vast, a force so
-intense and penetrating, if we are told that the one dwindles to an
-insensible point, and the other is unfelt at the nearest of the fixed
-stars, from the mere effect of their remoteness, while among those
-very stars are some whose actual splendour exceeds by many hundred
-times that of the sun itself, although we may not deny the truth of the
-assertion, we cannot but feel the keenest curiosity to know _how_ such
-things were ever made out.
-
-(18.) The foregoing are among those results of scientific research
-which, by their magnitude, seem to transcend our powers of conception.
-There are others, again, which, from their minuteness, would appear
-to elude the grasp of thought, much more of distinct and accurate
-measurement. Who would not ask for demonstration, when told that a
-gnat’s wing, in its ordinary flight, beats many hundred times in a
-second? or that there exist animated and regularly organized beings,
-many thousands of whose bodies laid close together would not extend an
-inch? But what are these to the astonishing truths which modern optical
-enquiries have disclosed, which teach us that every point of a medium
-through which a ray of light passes is affected with a succession of
-periodical movements, regularly recurring at equal intervals, no less
-than five hundred millions of millions of times in a single second!
-that it is by such movements, communicated to the nerves of our eyes,
-that we see:--nay more, that it is the _difference_ in the frequency of
-their recurrence which affects us with the sense of the diversity of
-colour; that, for instance, in acquiring the sensation of redness our
-eyes are affected four hundred and eighty-two millions of millions of
-times; of yellowness, five hundred and forty-two millions of millions
-of times; and of violet, seven hundred and seven millions of millions
-of times per second.[7] Do not such things sound more like the ravings
-of madmen, than the sober conclusions of people in their waking senses?
-
-(19.) They are, nevertheless, conclusions to which any one may most
-certainly arrive, who will only be at the trouble of examining the
-chain of reasoning by which they have been deduced; but, in order
-to do this, something beyond the mere elements of abstract science
-is required. Waving, however, such instances as these, which, after
-all, are rather calculated to surprise and astound than for any other
-purpose, it must be observed that it is not possible to satisfy
-ourselves completely that we _have_ arrived at a true statement of any
-law of nature, until, setting out from such statement, and making it
-a foundation of reasoning, we can show, by strict argument, that the
-facts observed must follow from it as necessary logical consequences,
-and _this_, not vaguely and generally, but with all possible precision
-in time, place, weight, and measure.
-
-(20.) To do this, however, as we shall presently see, requires in many
-cases a degree of knowledge of mathematics and geometry altogether
-unattainable by the generality of mankind, who have not the leisure,
-even if they all had the capacity, to enter into such enquiries,
-some of which are indeed of that degree of difficulty that they can
-be only successfully prosecuted by persons who devote to them their
-whole attention, and make them the serious business of their lives.
-But there is scarcely any person of good ordinary understanding,
-however little exercised in abstract enquiries, who may not be readily
-made to comprehend at least the general train of reasoning by which
-any of the great truths of physics are deduced, and the essential
-bearings and connections of the several parts of natural philosophy.
-There are whole branches too and very extensive and important ones, to
-which mathematical reasoning has never been at all applied; such as
-chemistry, geology, and natural history in general, and many others,
-in which it plays a very subordinate part, and of which the essential
-principles, and the grounds of application to useful purposes, may
-be perfectly well understood by a student who possesses no more
-mathematical knowledge than the rules of arithmetic; so that no one
-need be deterred from the acquisition of knowledge, or even from
-active original research in such subjects, by a want of mathematical
-information. Even in those branches which, like astronomy, optics, and
-dynamics, are almost exclusively under the dominion of mathematics, and
-in which no effectual progress can be made without _some_ acquaintance
-with geometry, the principal _results_ may be perfectly understood
-without it. To one incapable of following out the intricacies of
-mathematical demonstration, the conviction afforded by verified
-predictions must stand in the place of that purer and more satisfactory
-reliance which a verification of every step in the process of reasoning
-can alone afford, since every one will acknowledge the validity of
-pretensions which he is in the daily habit of seeing brought to the
-test of practice.
-
-(21.) Among the verifications of this practical kind which abound
-in every department of physics, there are none more imposing than
-the precise prediction of the greater phenomena of astronomy; none,
-certainly, which carry a broader conviction home to every mind from
-their notoriety and unequivocal character. The prediction of eclipses
-has accordingly from the earliest ages excited the admiration of
-mankind, and been one grand instrument by which their allegiance (so
-to speak) to natural science, and their respect for its professors,
-has been maintained; and though strangely abused in unenlightened ages
-by the supernatural pretensions of astrologers, the credence given
-even to their absurdities shows the force of this kind of evidence on
-men’s minds. The predictions of astronomers are, however, now far too
-familiar to endanger the just equipoise of our judgment, since even the
-return of comets, true to their paths and exact to the hour of their
-appointment, has ceased to amaze, though it must ever delight all who
-have souls capable of being penetrated by such beautiful instances of
-accordance between theory and facts. But the age of mere wonder in
-such things is past, and men prefer being guided and enlightened, to
-being astonished and dazzled. Eclipses, comets, and the like, afford
-but rare and transient displays of the powers of calculation, and of
-the certainty of the principles on which it is grounded. A page of
-“lunar distances” from the Nautical Almanack is worth all the eclipses
-that have ever happened for inspiring this necessary confidence in the
-conclusions of science. That a man, by merely measuring the moon’s
-apparent distance from a star with a little portable instrument held
-in his hand, and applied to his eye, even with so unstable a footing
-as the deck of a ship, shall say positively, within five miles, where
-he is, on a boundless ocean, cannot but appear to persons ignorant of
-physical astronomy an approach to the miraculous. Yet, the alternatives
-of life and death, wealth and ruin, are daily and hourly staked with
-perfect confidence on these marvellous computations, which might
-almost seem to have been devised on purpose to show how closely the
-extremes of speculative refinement and practical utility can be brought
-to approximate. We have before us an anecdote communicated to us by
-a naval officer[8], distinguished for the extent and variety of his
-attainments, which shows how impressive such results may become in
-practice. He sailed from San Blas on the west coast of Mexico, and
-after a voyage of 8000 miles, occupying 89 days, arrived off Rio de
-Janeiro, having, in this interval, passed through the Pacific Ocean,
-rounded Cape Horn, and crossed the South Atlantic, without making any
-land, or even seeing a single sail, with the exception of an American
-whaler off Cape Horn. Arrived within a week’s sail of Rio, he set
-seriously about determining, by lunar observations, the precise line
-of the ship’s course and its situation in it at a determinate moment,
-and having ascertained this within from five to ten miles, ran the
-rest of the way by those more ready and compendious methods, known to
-navigators, which can be safely employed for short trips between one
-known point and another, but which cannot be trusted in long voyages,
-where the moon is the only sure guide. The rest of the tale we are
-enabled by his kindness to state in his own words:--“We steered towards
-Rio de Janeiro for some days after taking the lunars above described,
-and having arrived within fifteen or twenty miles of the coast, I hove
-to at four in the morning till the day should break, and then bore
-up; for although it was very hazy, we could see before us a couple of
-miles or so. About eight o’clock it became so foggy that I did not
-like to stand in farther, and was just bringing the ship to the wind
-again before sending the people to breakfast, when it suddenly cleared
-off, and I had the satisfaction of seeing the great Sugar Loaf Rock,
-which stands on one side of the harbour’s mouth, so nearly right ahead
-that we had not to alter our course above a point in order to hit the
-entrance of Rio. This was the first land we had seen for three months,
-after crossing so many seas and being set backwards and forwards by
-innumerable currents and foul winds.” The effect on all on board might
-well be conceived to have been electric; and it is needless to remark
-how essentially the authority of a commanding officer over his crew may
-be strengthened by the occurrence of such incidents, indicative of a
-degree of knowledge and consequent power beyond their reach.
-
-(22.) But even such results as these, striking as they are, yet fall
-short of the force with which conviction is urged upon us when,
-through the medium of reasoning too abstract for common apprehension,
-we arrive at conclusions which outrun experience, and describe
-beforehand what will happen under new combinations, or even correct
-imperfect experiments, and lead us to a knowledge of facts contrary
-to received analogies drawn from an experience wrongly interpreted
-or overhastily generalised. To give an example:--every body knows
-that objects viewed through a transparent medium, such as water or
-glass, appear distorted or displaced. Thus, a stick in water appears
-bent, and an object seen through a prism or wedge of glass seems to
-be thrown aside from its true place. This effect is owing to what is
-called the _refraction_ of light; and a simple rule discovered by
-Willebrod Snell enables any one to say exactly _how much_ the stick
-will be bent, and _how far_, and in what _direction_, the apparent
-situation of an object seen through the glass will deviate from the
-real one. If a shilling be laid at the bottom of a basin of water
-and viewed obliquely, it will appear to be raised by the water; if
-instead of water spirits of wine be used it will appear more raised;
-if oil, still more:--but in none of these cases will it appear to be
-thrown _aside_ to the _right_ or _left_ of its true place, however
-the eye be situated. The _plane_, in which are contained the eye,
-the object, and the point in the surface of the liquid at which the
-object is seen, is an upright or _vertical_ plane; and this is one of
-the principal characters in the _ordinary refraction_ of light, viz.
-that the ray by which we see an object through a refracting surface,
-although it undergoes a bending, and is, as it were, broken at the
-surface, yet, in pursuing its course to the eye, does not _quit a plane
-perpendicular to the refracting surface_. But there are again other
-substances, such as rock-crystal, and especially Iceland spar, which
-possess the singular property of _doubling_ the image or appearance
-of an object seen through them in certain directions; so that instead
-of seeing one object we see two, side by side, when such a crystal or
-spar is interposed between the object and the eye; and if a ray or
-small sunbeam be thrown upon a surface of either of these substances,
-it will be split into two, making an angle with each other, and each
-pursuing its own separate course,--this is called _double refraction_.
-Now, of these images or doubly refracted rays, one always follows
-the same rule as if the substance were glass or water: its deviation
-can be correctly calculated by Snell’s law above mentioned, and it
-does not quit the plane perpendicular to the refracting surface. The
-other ray, on the contrary, (which is therefore said to have undergone
-_extraordinary refraction_) _does_ quit that plane, and the amount of
-its deviation from its former course requires for its determination a
-much more complicated rule, which cannot be understood or even stated
-without a pretty intimate knowledge of geometry. Now, rock-crystal
-and Iceland spar differ from glass in a very remarkable circumstance.
-They affect naturally certain regular figures, not being found in
-shapeless lumps, but in determinate geometrical forms; and they are
-susceptible of being cleft or split much easier in certain directions
-than in others--they have a _grain_ which glass has not. When other
-substances having this peculiarity (and which are called _crystallized_
-substances) were examined, they were all, or by far the greater part,
-found to possess this singular property of _double refraction_; and
-it was very natural to conclude, therefore, that the same thing took
-place in all of them, viz. that of the two rays, into which any beam of
-light falling on the surface of such a substance was split, or of the
-two images of an object seen through it, _one_ only was turned aside
-out of its _plane_ and _extraordinarily_ refracted, while the other
-followed the _ordinary_ rule. Accordingly this was supposed to be the
-case; and not only so, but from some trials and measurements purposely
-made by a philosopher of great eminence, it was considered to be a fact
-sufficiently established by experiment.
-
-(23.) Perhaps we might have remained long under this impression, for
-the measurements are delicate, and the subject very difficult. But
-it has lately been demonstrated by an eminent French philosopher and
-mathematician, M. Fresnel, that, granting certain _principles_ or
-postulates, all the phenomena of double refraction, including perhaps
-the greatest variety of facts that have ever yet been arranged under
-one general head, may be satisfactorily explained and deduced from them
-by strict mathematical calculation; and _that_, when applied to the
-cases first mentioned, these principles give a satisfactory account
-of the _want_ of the extraordinary image; _that_ when applied to such
-cases as those of rock-crystal or Iceland spar, they also give a
-correct account of both the images, and agree in their conclusions with
-the rules before ascertained for them: but so far from coinciding with
-that part of the previous statement, which would make these conclusions
-extend to all crystallised substances, M. Fresnel’s principles lead
-to a conclusion quite opposite, and point to a _fact_ which had never
-been observed, viz. that in by far the greater number of crystallized
-substances which possess the property of double refraction, _neither_
-of the images follows the ordinary law, but both undergo a deviation
-from their original plane. Now this had never been observed to be
-the case in any previous trial, and all opinion was against it. But
-when put to the test of experiment in a great variety of new and
-ingenious methods, it was found to be fully verified; and to complete
-the evidence, the substances on whose imperfect examination the
-first erroneous conclusion was founded, having been lately subjected
-to a fresh and more scrupulous examination, the result has shown
-the insufficiency of the former measurements, and proved in perfect
-accordance with the newly discovered laws. Now it will be observed
-in this case, first, that, so far from the principles assumed by M.
-Fresnel being at all obvious, they are extremely remote from ordinary
-observation; and, secondly, that the chain of reasoning by which they
-are brought to the test is one of such length and complexity, and the
-purely mathematical difficulty of their application so great, that
-no _mere_ good common sense, no general tact or ordinary practical
-reasoning, would afford the slightest chance of threading their
-mazes. Cases like this are the triumph of theories. They show at once
-how large a part pure reason has to perform in our examination of
-nature, and how implicit our reliance ought to be on that powerful and
-methodical system of rules and processes which constitute the modern
-mathematical analysis, in all the more difficult applications of exact
-calculation to her phenomena.
-
-(24.) To take an instance more within ordinary apprehension. An
-eminent living geometer had proved by calculations, founded on strict
-optical principles, that in the _centre of the shadow_ of a small
-circular plate of metal, exposed in a dark room to a beam of light
-emanating from a _very small brilliant point_, there ought to be no
-darkness,--in fact, _no shadow_ at that place; but, on the contrary, a
-degree of illumination precisely as bright as if the metal plate were
-away. Strange and even impossible as this conclusion may seem, it has
-been put to the trial, and found perfectly correct.[9]
-
-(25.) We shall now proceed to consider more particularly, and in
-detail,--
-
- I. The nature and objects immediate and collateral of physical
- science, as regarded in itself, and in its application to
- the practical purposes of life, and its influence on the
- well-being and progress of society.
-
- II. The principles on which it relies for its successful
- prosecution, and the rules by which a systematic examination
- of nature should be conducted, with examples illustrative of
- their influence.
-
- III. The subdivision of physical science into distinct branches,
- and their mutual relations.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. III.
-
- OF THE NATURE AND OBJECTS, IMMEDIATE AND COLLATERAL, OF PHYSICAL
- SCIENCE, AS REGARDED IN ITSELF, AND IN ITS APPLICATION TO THE
- PRACTICAL PURPOSES OF LIFE, AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE WELL-BEING
- AND PROGRESS OF SOCIETY.
-
-
-(26.) The first thing impressed on us from our earliest infancy is,
-that events do not succeed one another at random, but with a certain
-degree of order, regularity, and connection;--some constantly, and, as
-we are apt to think, immutably,--as the alternation of day and night,
-summer and winter,--others contingently, as the motion of a body from
-its place, if pushed, or the burning of a stick if thrust into the
-fire. The knowledge that the former class of events _has_ gone on,
-uninterruptedly, for ages beyond all memory, impresses us with a strong
-expectation that it will continue to do so in the same manner; and
-thus our notion of an _order of nature_ is originated and confirmed.
-If every thing were equally regular and periodical, and the succession
-of events liable to no change depending on our own will, it may be
-doubted whether we should ever think of looking for causes. No one
-regards the night as the cause of the day, or the day of night. They
-are alternate effects of a common cause, which their regular succession
-alone gives us no sufficient clue for determining. It is chiefly,
-perhaps entirely, from the other or contingent class of events that
-we gain our notions of cause and effect. From them alone we gather
-that there are such things as laws of nature. The very idea of a law
-includes that of contingency. “_Si quis mala carmina condidisset, fuste
-ferito_;” if such a case arise, such a course shall be followed,--if
-the match be applied to the gunpowder, it will explode. Every law is a
-provision for cases which _may_ occur, and has relation to an infinite
-number of cases that never have occurred, and never will. Now, it is
-this provision, _à priori_, for contingencies, this contemplation
-of possible occurrences, and predisposal of what shall happen, that
-impresses us with the notion of a _law_ and a _cause_. Among all the
-possible combinations of the fifty or sixty elements which chemistry
-shows to exist on the earth, it is likely, nay almost certain, that
-_some_ have never been formed; that some elements, in some proportions,
-and under some circumstances, have never yet been placed in relation
-with one another. Yet no chemist can doubt that it is _already fixed_
-what they will do when the case does occur. They will obey certain
-laws, of which we know nothing at present, but which must _be_ already
-fixed, or they could not be laws. It is not by habit, or by trial
-and failure, that they will learn what to do. When the contingency
-occurs, there will be no hesitation, no consultation;--their course
-will at once be decided, and will always be the same if it occur ever
-so often in succession, or in ever so many places at one and the same
-instant. This is the perfection of a law, that it includes all possible
-contingencies, and ensures implicit obedience,--and of this kind are
-the laws of nature.
-
-(27.) This use of the word _law_, however, our readers will of course
-perceive has relation to us as understanding, rather than to the
-materials of which the universe consists as obeying, certain rules.
-To obey a law, to act in _compliance_ with a rule, supposes an
-understanding and a will, a power of complying or not, in the being who
-obeys and complies, which we do not admit as belonging to mere matter.
-The Divine Author of the universe cannot be supposed to have laid down
-particular laws, enumerating all individual contingencies, which his
-materials have understood and obey,--this would be to attribute to
-him the imperfections of human legislation;--but rather, by creating
-them, endued with certain fixed qualities and powers, he has impressed
-them in their origin with the _spirit_, not the _letter_, of his law,
-and made all their subsequent combinations and relations inevitable
-consequences of this first impression, by which, however, we would no
-way be understood to deny the constant exercise of his direct power in
-maintaining the system of nature, or the ultimate emanation of every
-energy which material agents exert from his immediate will, acting in
-conformity with his own laws.
-
-(28.) The discoveries of modern chemistry have gone far to establish
-the truth of an opinion entertained by some of the ancients, that
-the universe consists of distinct, separate, indivisible _atoms_,
-or individual beings so minute as to escape our senses, except when
-united by millions, and by this aggregation making up bodies of even
-the smallest visible bulk; and we have the strongest evidence that,
-although there exist great and essential differences in individuals
-among these atoms, they may yet all be arranged in a very limited
-number of groups or classes, all the individuals of each of which
-are, to all intents and purposes, _exactly alike_ in all their
-properties. Now, when we see a great number of things precisely alike,
-we do not believe this similarity to have originated except from a
-common principle independent of them; and that we recognise this
-likeness, chiefly by the identity of their deportment under similar
-circumstances, strengthens rather than weakens the conclusion. A line
-of spinning-jennies[10], or a regiment of soldiers dressed exactly
-alike, and going through precisely the same evolutions, gives us no
-idea of independent existence: we must see them act out of concert
-before we can believe them to have independent wills and properties,
-not impressed on them from without. And this conclusion, which would
-be strong even were there only two individuals precisely alike in
-_all_ respects and _for ever_, acquires irresistible force when their
-number is multiplied beyond the power of imagination to conceive. If
-we mistake not, then, the discoveries alluded to effectually destroy
-the idea of an _eternal self-existent matter_, by giving to each of its
-atoms the essential characters, at once, of a _manufactured article_,
-and a _subordinate agent_.
-
-(29.) But to ascend to the origin of things, and speculate on the
-creation, is not the business of the natural philosopher. An humbler
-field is sufficient for him in the endeavour to discover, as far
-as our faculties will permit, what _are_ these primary qualities
-originally and unalterably impressed on matter, and to discover the
-_spirit_ of the laws of nature, which includes groups and classes of
-relations and facts from the _letter_ which, as before observed, is
-presented to us by single phenomena: or if, after all, this should
-prove impossible; if such a step be beyond our faculties; and the
-essential qualities of material agents be really _occult_, or incapable
-of being expressed in any form intelligible to our understandings, at
-least to approach as near to their comprehension as the nature of the
-case will allow; and devise such forms of words as shall include and
-_represent_ the greatest possible multitude and variety of phenomena.
-
-(30.) Now, in this research there would seem one great question to
-be disposed of before our enquiries can even be commenced with any
-thing like a prospect of success, which is, whether the laws of
-nature themselves _have_ that degree of permanence and fixity which
-can render them subjects of systematic discussion; or whether, on the
-other hand, the qualities of natural agents are subject to mutation
-from the lapse of time. To the ancients, who lived in the infancy of
-the world, or rather, in the infancy of man’s experience, this was a
-very rational subject of question, and hence their distinctions between
-corruptible and incorruptible matter. Thus, according to some among
-them, the matter only of the celestial spaces is pure, immutable, and
-incorruptible, while all sublunary things are in a constant state of
-lapse and change; the world becoming paralysed and effete with age,
-and man himself deteriorating in character, and diminishing at once in
-intellectual and bodily stature. But to us, who have the experience
-of some additional thousands of years, the question of permanence is
-already, in a great measure, decided in the affirmative. The refined
-speculations of modern astronomy, grounding their conclusions on
-observations made at very remote periods, have proved to demonstration,
-that one at least of the great powers of nature, the force of
-gravitation, the main bond and support of the material universe, has
-undergone no change in intensity from a high antiquity. The stature of
-mankind is just what it was three thousand years ago, as the specimens
-of mummies which have been examined at various times sufficiently
-show. The intellect of Newton, Laplace, or Lagrange, may stand in
-fair competition with that of Archimedes, Aristotle, or Plato; and the
-virtues and patriotism of Washington with the brightest examples of
-ancient history.
-
-(31.) Again, the researches of chemists have shown that what the
-vulgar call corruption, destruction, &c., is nothing but a change of
-arrangement of the same ingredient elements, the disposition of the
-same materials into other forms, without the loss or actual destruction
-of a single atom; and thus any doubts of the permanence of natural
-laws are discountenanced, and the whole weight of _appearances_ thrown
-into the opposite scale. One of the most obvious cases of apparent
-destruction is, when any thing is ground to dust and scattered to the
-winds. But it is one thing to grind a fabric to powder, and another to
-annihilate its materials: scattered as they may be, they must fall
-somewhere, and continue, if only as ingredients of the soil, to perform
-their humble but useful part in the economy of nature. The destruction
-produced by fire is more striking: in many cases, as in the burning
-of a piece of charcoal or a taper, there is no smoke, nothing visibly
-dissipated and carried away; the burning body wastes and disappears,
-while nothing _seems_ to be produced but warmth and light, which we
-are not in the habit of considering as substances; and when all has
-disappeared, except perhaps some trifling ashes, we naturally enough
-suppose it is gone, lost, destroyed. But when the question is examined
-more exactly, we detect, in the invisible stream of heated air which
-ascends from the glowing coal or flaming wax, the _whole_ ponderable
-matter, only united in a new combination with the air, and dissolved in
-it. Yet, so far from being thereby destroyed, it is only become again
-what it was before it existed in the form of charcoal or wax, an active
-agent in the business of the world, and a main support of vegetable
-and animal life, and is still susceptible of running again and again
-the same round, as circumstances may determine; so that, for aught we
-can see to the contrary, the same identical atom may lie concealed for
-thousands of centuries in a limestone rock; may at length be quarried,
-set free in the limekiln, mix with the air, be absorbed from it by
-plants, and, in succession, become a part of the frames of myriads of
-living beings, till some concurrence of events consigns it once more to
-a long repose, which, however, no way unfits it from again resuming its
-former activity.
-
-(32.) Now, this absolute indestructibility of the ultimate materials
-of the world, in periods commensurate to our experience, and their
-obstinate retention of the same properties, under whatever variety of
-circumstances we choose to place them, however violent and seemingly
-contradictory to their natures, is, of itself, enough to render it
-highly improbable that time alone should have any influence over
-them. All that age or decay can do seems to be included in a wasting
-of parts which are only dissipated, not destroyed, or in a change of
-sensible properties, which chemistry demonstrates to arise only from
-new combinations of the same ingredients. But, after all, the question
-is one entirely of experience: we cannot be sure, _à priori_, that
-the laws of nature are _immutable_; but we can ascertain, by enquiry,
-_whether they change or not_; and to this enquiry all experience
-answers in the negative. It is not, of course, intended here to
-deny that great operations, productive of extensive changes in the
-visible state of nature,--such as, for instance, those contemplated
-by the geologists, and embracing for their completion vast periods
-of time,--are constantly going on; but these are consequences and
-fulfilments of the laws of nature, not contradictions or exceptions
-to them. No theorist regards such changes as alterations in the
-fundamental principles of nature; he only endeavours to reconcile them,
-and show how they result from laws already known, and judges of the
-correctness of his theory by their ultimate agreement.
-
-(33.) But the laws of nature are not only permanent, but consistent,
-intelligible, and discoverable with such a moderate degree of
-research, as is calculated rather to stimulate than to weary curiosity.
-If we were set down, as creatures of another world, in any existing
-society of mankind, and began to speculate on their actions, we should
-find it difficult at first to ascertain whether they were subject to
-any laws at all: but when, by degrees, we had found out that they did
-consider themselves to be so; and would then proceed to ascertain, from
-their conduct and its consequences, what these laws were, and in what
-spirit conceived; though we might not perhaps have much difficulty
-in discovering single rules applicable to particular cases, yet, the
-moment we came to generalize, and endeavour from these to ascend, step
-by step, and discover any steady pervading principle, the mass of
-incongruities, absurdities, and contradictions, we should encounter,
-would either dishearten us from further enquiry or satisfy us that what
-we were in search of did not exist. It is quite the contrary in nature;
-there we find no contradictions, no incongruities, but all is harmony.
-What once is learnt we never have to unlearn. As rules advance in
-generality, apparent exceptions become regular; and equivoque, in her
-sublime legislation, is as unheard of as maladministration.
-
-(34.) Living, then, in a world where such laws obtain, and under their
-immediate dominion, it is manifestly of the utmost importance to know
-them, were it for no other reason than to be sure, in all we undertake,
-to have, at least, the law on our side, so as not to struggle in vain
-against some insuperable difficulty opposed to us by natural causes.
-What pains and expense would not the alchemists, for instance, have
-been spared by a knowledge of those simple laws of composition and
-decomposition, which now preclude all idea of the attainment of their
-declared object! what an amount of ingenuity, thrown away on the
-pursuit of the perpetual motion, might have been turned to better
-use, if the simplest laws of mechanics had been known and attended to
-by the inventors of innumerable contrivances destined to that end!
-What tortures, inflicted on patients by imaginary cures of incurable
-diseases, might have been dispensed with, had a few simple principles
-of physiology been earlier recognised!
-
-(35.) But if the laws of nature, on the one hand, are invincible
-opponents, on the other, they are irresistible auxiliaries; and it
-will not be amiss if we regard them in each of those characters, and
-consider the great importance of a knowledge of them to mankind,--
-
- I. _In showing us how to avoid attempting impossibilities._
-
- II. _In securing us from important mistakes in attempting what
- is, in itself, possible, by means either inadequate, or
- actually opposed, to the end in view._
-
- III. _In enabling us to accomplish our ends in the easiest,
- shortest, most economical, and most effectual manner._
-
- IV. _In inducing us to attempt, and enabling us to accomplish,
- objects which, but for such knowledge, we should never have
- thought of undertaking._
-
-We shall therefore proceed to illustrate by examples the effect of
-physical knowledge under each of these heads:--
-
-(36.) Ex. 1. (35.) I. It is not many years since an attempt was made
-to establish a colliery at Bexhill, in Sussex. The appearance of
-thin seams and sheets of fossil-wood and wood-coal, with some other
-indications similar to what occur in the neighbourhood of the great
-coal-beds in the north of England, having led to the sinking of a
-shaft, and the erection of machinery on a scale of vast expense, not
-less than eighty thousand pounds are said to have been laid out on
-this project, which, it is almost needless to add, proved completely
-abortive, as every geologist would have at once declared it must, the
-whole assemblage of geological facts being adverse to the existence
-of a regular coal-bed _in_ the Hastings’ _sand_; while this, on which
-Bexhill is situated, is separated from the _coal-strata_ by a series
-of interposed beds of such enormous thickness as to render all idea of
-penetrating _through_ them absurd. The history of mining operations
-is full of similar cases, where a very moderate acquaintance with the
-_usual order of nature_, to say nothing of theoretical views, would
-have saved many a sanguine adventurer from utter ruin.
-
-(37.) Ex. 2. (35.) II. The smelting of iron requires the application
-of the most violent heat that can be raised, and is commonly performed
-in tall furnaces, urged by great iron bellows driven by steam-engines.
-Instead of employing this power to force _air_ into the furnace through
-the intervention of bellows, it was, on one occasion, attempted to
-employ the steam itself in, apparently, a much less circuitous manner;
-viz. by directing the current of steam in a violent blast, from the
-boiler at once into the fire. From one of the known ingredients of
-steam being a highly inflammable body, and the other that essential
-part of the air which supports combustion, it was imagined that this
-would have the effect of increasing the fire to tenfold fury, whereas
-it simply _blew it out_; a result which a slight consideration of the
-laws of chemical combination, and the state in which the ingredient
-elements exist in steam, would have enabled any one to predict without
-a trial.
-
-(38.) Ex. 3. (35.) II. After the invention of the diving-bell, and its
-success in subaqueous processes, it was considered highly desirable
-to devise some means of remaining for any length of time under water,
-and rising at pleasure without assistance, so as either to examine,
-at leisure, the bottom, or perform, at ease, any work that might be
-required. Some years ago, an ingenious individual proposed a project
-by which this end was to be accomplished. It consisted in sinking
-the hull of a ship made quite water-tight, with the decks and sides
-strongly supported by shores, and the only entry secured by a stout
-trap-door, in such a manner, that by disengaging, from within, the
-weights employed to sink it, it might rise of itself to the surface. To
-render the trial more satisfactory, and the result more striking, the
-projector himself made the first essay. It was agreed that he should
-sink in twenty fathoms water, and rise again without assistance at
-the expiration of twenty-four hours. Accordingly, making all secure,
-fastening down his trap-door, and provided with all necessaries, as
-well as with the means of making signals to indicate his situation,
-this unhappy victim of his own ingenuity entered and was sunk. No
-signal was made, and the time appointed elapsed. An immense concourse
-of people had assembled to witness his rising, but in vain; for the
-vessel was never seen more. The pressure of the water at so great a
-depth had, no doubt, been completely under-estimated, and the sides of
-the vessel being at once crushed in, the unfortunate projector perished
-before he could even make the signal concerted to indicate his distress.
-
-(39.) Ex. 4. (35.) III. In the granite quarries near Seringapatam the
-most enormous blocks are separated from the solid rock by the following
-neat and simple process. The workman having found a portion of the rock
-sufficiently extensive, and situated near the edge of the part already
-quarried, lays bare the upper surface, and marks on it a line in the
-direction of the intended separation, along which a groove is cut with
-a chisel about a couple of inches in depth. Above this groove a narrow
-line of fire is then kindled, and maintained till the rock below is
-thoroughly heated, immediately on which a line of men and women, each
-provided with a pot full of cold water, suddenly sweep off the ashes,
-and pour the water into the heated groove, when the rock at once
-splits with a clean fracture. Square blocks of six feet in the side,
-and upwards of eighty feet in length, are sometimes detached by this
-method, or by another equally simple and efficacious, but not easily
-explained without entering into particulars of mineralogical detail.[11]
-
-(40.) Ex. 5. (35.) III. Hardly less simple and efficacious is the
-process used in some parts of France, where mill-stones are made. When
-a mass of stone sufficiently large is found, it is cut into a cylinder
-several feet high, and the question then arises how to subdivide
-this into horizontal pieces so as to make as many mill-stones. For
-this purpose horizontal indentations or grooves are chiselled out
-quite round the cylinder, at distances corresponding to the thickness
-intended to be given to the mill-stones, into which wedges of dried
-wood are driven. These are then wetted, or exposed to the night dew,
-and next morning the different pieces are found separated from each
-other by the expansion of the wood, consequent on its absorption of
-moisture; an irresistible natural power thus accomplishing, almost
-without any trouble, and at no expense, an operation which, from
-the peculiar hardness and texture of the stone, would otherwise
-be impracticable but by the most powerful machinery or the most
-persevering labour.
-
-(41.) Ex. 6. (35.) III. To accomplish our ends quickly is often of, at
-least, as much importance as to accomplish them with little labour and
-expense. There are innumerable processes which, if left to themselves,
-_i. e._ to the ordinary operation of natural causes, are done, and well
-done, but with extreme slowness, and in such cases it is often of
-the highest practical importance to accelerate them. The bleaching of
-linen, for instance, performed in the natural way by exposure to sun,
-rain, and wind, requires many weeks or even months for its completion;
-whereas, by the simple immersion of the cloth in a liquid, chemically
-prepared, the same effect is produced in a few hours. The whole circle
-of the arts, indeed, is nothing but one continued comment upon this
-head of our subject. The instances above given are selected, not on
-account of their superior importance, but for the simplicity and
-_directness_ of application of the principles on which they depend, to
-the objects intended to be attained.
-
-(42.) But so constituted is the mind of man, that his views enlarge,
-and his desires and wants increase, in the full proportion of the
-facilities afforded to their gratification, and, indeed, with augmented
-rapidity, so that no sooner has the successful exercise of his powers
-accomplished any considerable simplification or improvement of
-processes subservient to his use or comfort, than his faculties are
-again on the stretch to extend the limits of his newly acquired power;
-and having once experienced the advantages which are to be gathered
-by availing himself of some of the powers of nature to accomplish
-his ends, he is led thenceforward to regard them all as a treasure
-placed at his disposal, if he have only the art, the industry, or the
-good fortune, to penetrate those recesses which conceal them from
-immediate view. Having once learned to look on knowledge as power, and
-to avail himself of it as such, he is no longer content to limit his
-enterprises to the beaten track of former usage, but is constantly
-led onwards to contemplate objects which, in a previous stage of his
-progress, he would have regarded as unattainable and visionary, had he
-even thought of them at all. It is here that the investigation of the
-hidden powers of nature becomes a mine, every vein of which is pregnant
-with inexhaustible wealth, and whose ramifications appear to extend in
-all directions wherever human wants or curiosity may lead us to explore.
-
-(43.) Between the physical sciences and the arts of life there subsists
-a constant mutual interchange of good offices, and no considerable
-progress can be made in the one without of necessity giving rise to
-corresponding steps in the other. On the one hand, every art is in
-some measure, and many entirely, dependent on those very powers and
-qualities of the material world which it is the object of physical
-enquiry to investigate and explain; and, accordingly, abundant examples
-might be cited of cases where the remarks of experienced artists, or
-even ordinary workmen, have led to the discovery of natural qualities,
-elements, or combinations which have proved of the highest importance
-in physics. Thus (to give an instance), a soap-manufacturer remarks
-that the residuum of his ley, when exhausted of the alkali for which
-he employs it, produces a corrosion of his copper boiler for which he
-cannot account. He puts it into the hands of a scientific chemist for
-analysis, and the result is the discovery of one of the most singular
-and important chemical elements, iodine. The properties of this,
-being studied, are found to occur most appositely in illustration
-and support of a variety of new, curious, and instructive views then
-gaining ground in chemistry, and thus exercise a marked influence
-over the whole body of that science. Curiosity is excited: the origin
-of the new substance is traced to the sea-plants from whose ashes
-the principal ingredient of soap is obtained, and ultimately to the
-sea-water itself. It is thence hunted through nature, discovered in
-salt mines and springs, and pursued into all bodies which have a marine
-origin; among the rest, into sponge. A medical practitioner[12] then
-calls to mind a reputed remedy for the cure of one of the most grievous
-and unsightly disorders to which the human species is subject--the
-_goître_--which infests the inhabitants of mountainous districts to
-an extent that in this favoured land we have happily no experience
-of, and which was said to have been originally cured by the ashes of
-burnt sponge. Led by this indication he tries the effect of iodine on
-that complaint, and the result establishes the extraordinary fact that
-this singular substance, taken as a medicine, acts with the utmost
-promptitude and energy on _goître_, dissipating the largest and most
-inveterate in a short time, and acting (of course, like all medicines,
-even the most approved, with occasional failures,) as a specific, or
-natural antagonist, against that odious deformity. It is thus that
-any accession to our knowledge of nature is sure, sooner or later, to
-make itself felt in some practical application, and that a benefit
-conferred on science by the casual observation or shrewd remark of even
-an unscientific or illiterate person infallibly repays itself with
-interest, though often in a way that could never have been at first
-contemplated.
-
-(44.) It is to such observation, reflected upon, however, and matured
-into a rational and scientific form by a mind deeply imbued with the
-best principles of sound philosophy, that we owe the practice of
-vaccination; a practice which has effectually subdued, in every country
-where it has been introduced, one of the most frightful scourges of
-the human race, and in some extirpated it altogether. Happily for us
-we know only by tradition the ravages of the small-pox, as it existed
-among us hardly more than a century ago, and as it would in a few
-years infallibly exist again, were the barriers which this practice,
-and that of inoculation, oppose to its progress abandoned. Hardly
-inferior to this terrible scourge on land was, within the last seventy
-or eighty years, the scurvy at sea. The sufferings and destruction
-produced by this horrid disorder on board our ships when, as a matter
-of course, it broke out after a few months’ voyage, seem now almost
-incredible. Deaths to the amount of eight or ten a day in a moderate
-ship’s company; bodies sewn up in hammocks and washing about the decks
-for want of strength and spirits on the part of the miserable survivors
-to cast them overboard; and every form of loathsome and excruciating
-misery of which the human frame is susceptible:--such are the pictures
-which the narratives of nautical adventure in those days continually
-offer.[13] At present the scurvy is almost completely eradicated in
-the navy, partly, no doubt, from increased and increasing attention to
-general cleanliness, comfort, and diet; but mainly from the constant
-use of a simple and palatable preventive, the acid of the lemon,
-served out in daily rations. If the gratitude of mankind be allowed on
-all hands to be the just meed of the philosophic physician, to whose
-discernment in seizing, and perseverance in forcing it on public notice
-we owe the great safeguard of infant life, it ought not to be denied to
-those[14] whose skill and discrimination have thus strengthened the
-sinews of our most powerful arm, and obliterated one of the darkest
-features in the most glorious of all professions.
-
-(45.) These last, however, are instances of simple observation,
-limited to the point immediately in view, and assuming only so far the
-character of science as a systematic adoption of good and rejection of
-evil, when grounded on experience carefully weighed, justly entitle
-it to do. They are not on that account less appositely cited as
-instances of the importance of a knowledge of nature and its laws to
-our well-being; though, like the great inventions of the mariner’s
-compass and of gunpowder, they may have stood, in their origin,
-unconnected with more general views. They are rather to be looked upon
-as the spontaneous produce of a territory essentially fertile, than as
-forming part of the succession of harvests which the same bountiful
-soil, diligently cultivated, is capable of yielding. The history of
-iodine above related affords, however, a perfect specimen of the
-manner in which a knowledge of natural properties and laws, collected
-from facts having no reference to the object to which they have
-been subsequently applied, enables us to set in array the resources
-of nature against herself; and deliberately, of afore-thought, to
-devise remedies against the dangers and inconveniences which beset
-us. In this view we might instance, too, the _conductor_, which, in
-countries where thunder-storms are more frequent and violent than in
-our own, and at sea (where they are attended with peculiar danger,
-both from the greater probability of accident, and its more terrible
-consequences when it does occur,) forms a most real and efficient
-preservative against the effects of lightning[15]:--the _safety-lamp_,
-which enables us to walk with light and security while surrounded with
-an atmosphere more explosive than gunpowder:--the _life-boat_, which
-cannot be sunk, and which offers relief in circumstances of all others
-the most distressing to humanity, and of which a recent invention
-promises to extend the principle to ships of the largest class:--the
-_lighthouse_, with the capital improvements which the lenses of
-Brewster and Fresnel, and the elegant lamp of lieutenant Drummond, have
-conferred, and promise yet to confer by their wonderful powers, the one
-of producing the most intense light yet known, the others of conveying
-it undispersed to great distances:--the discovery of the disinfectant
-powers of chlorine, and its application to the destruction of miasma
-and contagion:--that of _quinine_, the essential principle in which
-reside the febrifuge qualities of the Peruvian bark, a discovery by
-which posterity is yet to benefit in its full extent, but which has
-already begun to diffuse _comparative_ comfort and health through
-regions almost desolated by pestiferous exhalations[16];--and, if we
-desist, it is not because the list is exhausted, but because a sample,
-not a catalogue, is intended.
-
-(46.) One instance more, however, we will add, to illustrate the
-manner in which a most familiar effect, which seemed destined only
-to amuse children, or, at best, to furnish a philosophic toy, may
-become a safeguard of human life, and a remedy for a most serious
-and distressing evil. In needle manufactories the workmen who point
-the needles are constantly exposed to excessively minute particles of
-steel which fly from the grindstones, and mix, though imperceptible
-to the eye, as the finest dust in the air, and are inhaled with their
-breath. The effect, though imperceptible on a short exposure, yet,
-being constantly repeated from day to day, produces a constitutional
-irritation dependent on the tonic properties of the steel, which is
-sure to terminate in pulmonary consumption; insomuch, that persons
-employed in this kind of work used scarcely ever to attain the age of
-forty years.[17] In vain was it attempted to purify the air before its
-entry into the lungs by gauzes or linen guards; the dust was too fine
-and penetrating to be obstructed by such coarse expedients, till some
-ingenious person bethought him of that wonderful power which every
-child who searches for its mother’s needle with a magnet, or admires
-the motions and arrangement of a few steel filings on a sheet of paper
-held above it, sees in exercise. Masks of magnetized steel wire are now
-constructed and adapted to the faces of the workmen. By these the air
-is not merely _strained_ but _searched_ in its passage through them,
-and each obnoxious atom arrested and removed.
-
-(47.) Perhaps there is no result which places in a stronger light the
-advantages which are to be derived from a mere knowledge of the _usual
-order of nature_, without any attempt on our part to modify it, and
-apart from all consideration of its causes, than the institution of
-life-assurances. Nothing is more uncertain than the life of a single
-individual; and it is the sense of this insecurity which has given
-rise to such institutions. They are, in their nature and objects,
-the precise reverse of gambling speculations, their object being to
-equalize vicissitude, and to place the pecuniary relations of numerous
-masses of mankind, in so far as they extend, on a footing independent
-of individual casualty. To do this with the greatest possible
-advantage, or indeed with any advantage at all, it is necessary to know
-the _laws of mortality_, or the average numbers of individuals, out
-of a great multitude, who die at every period of life from infancy to
-extreme old age. At first sight this would seem a hopeless enquiry; to
-some, perhaps, a presumptuous one. But it has been made; and the result
-is, that, abating extraordinary causes, such as wars, pestilence, and
-the like, a remarkable regularity _does_ obtain, quite sufficient
-to afford grounds not only for general estimations, but for nice
-calculations of risk and adventure, such as infallibly to insure the
-success of any such institution founded on good computations; and thus
-to confer such stability on the fortunes of families dependent on the
-exertions of one individual as to constitute an important feature in
-modern civilization. The only thing to be feared in such institutions
-is their too great multiplication and consequent competition, by which
-a spirit of gambling and underbidding is liable to be generated among
-their conductors, and the very mischief may be produced, on a scale of
-frightful extent, which they are especially intended to prevent.
-
-(48.) We have hitherto considered only cases in which a knowledge of
-natural laws enables us to improve our condition, by counteracting
-evils of which, but for its possession, we must have remained forever
-the helpless victims. Let us now take a similar view of those in which
-we are enabled to call in nature as an auxiliary to augment our actual
-power, and capacitate us for undertakings, which without such aid might
-seem to be hopeless. Now, to this end, it is necessary that we should
-form a just conception of what those hidden powers of nature _are_,
-which we can at pleasure call into action;--how far they transcend
-the measure of human force, and set at naught the efforts not only of
-individuals but of whole nations of men.
-
-(49.) It is well known to modern engineers, that _there is virtue_ in a
-bushel of coals properly consumed, to raise seventy millions of pounds
-weight a foot high. This is actually the _average_ effect of an engine
-at this moment working in Cornwall.[18] Let us pause a moment, and
-consider what this is equivalent to in matters of practice.
-
-(50.) The ascent of Mont Blanc from the valley of Chamouni is
-considered, and with justice, as the most toilsome feat that a strong
-man can execute in two days. The combustion of two pounds of coal would
-place him on the summit.[19]
-
-(51.) The Menai Bridge, one of the most stupendous works of art that
-has been raised by man in modern ages, consists of a mass of iron, not
-less than four millions of pounds in weight, suspended at a medium
-height of about 120 feet above the sea. The consumption of seven
-bushels of coal would suffice to raise it to the place where it hangs.
-
-(52.) The great pyramid of Egypt is composed of granite. It is 700 feet
-in the side of its base, and 500 in perpendicular height, and stands on
-eleven acres of ground. Its weight is, therefore, 12,760 millions of
-pounds, at a medium height of 125 feet; consequently it would be raised
-by the effort of about 630 chaldrons of coal, a quantity consumed in
-some founderies in a week.
-
-(53.) The annual consumption of coal in London is estimated at
-1,500,000 chaldrons. The effort of this quantity would suffice to raise
-a cubical block of marble, 2200 feet in the side, through a space equal
-to its own height, or to pile one such mountain upon another. The Monte
-Nuovo, near Pozzuoli, (which was erupted in a single night by volcanic
-fire,) might have been raised by such an effort, from a depth of 40,000
-feet, or about eight miles.
-
-(54.) It will be observed, that, in the above statement, the inherent
-power of fuel is, of necessity, greatly under-rated. It is not
-pretended by engineers that the economy of fuel is yet pushed to its
-utmost limit, or that the whole effective power is obtained in any
-application of fire yet devised; so that were we to say 100 millions
-instead of 70, we should probably be nearer the truth.
-
-(55.) The powers of wind and water, which we are constantly impressing
-into our service, can scarcely be called latent or hidden, yet it
-is not fully considered, in general, what they _do_ effect for us.
-Those who would judge of what advantage may be taken of the wind, for
-example, even on land (not to speak of navigation), may turn their
-eyes on Holland. A great portion of the most valuable and populous
-tract of this country lies much below the level of the sea, and is only
-preserved from inundation by the maintenance of embankments. Though
-these suffice to keep out the abrupt influx of the ocean, they cannot
-oppose that law of nature, by which fluids, in seeking their level,
-insinuate themselves through the pores and subterraneous channels
-of a loose sandy soil, and keep the country in a constant state of
-infiltration from below upwards. To counteract this tendency, as well
-as to get rid of the rain water, which has no natural outlet, pumps
-worked by windmills are established in great numbers, on the dams
-and embankments, which pour out the water, as from a leaky ship, and
-in effect preserve the country from submersion, by taking advantage
-of every wind that blows. To drain the Haarlem lake[20] would seem a
-hopeless project to any speculators but those who had the steam-engine
-at their command, or had learnt in Holland what might be accomplished
-by the constant agency of the desultory but unwearied powers of wind.
-But the Dutch engineer measures his surface, calculates the number of
-his pumps, and, trusting to time and his experience of the operation of
-the winds for the success of his undertaking, boldly forms his plans to
-lay dry the bed of an inland sea, of which those who stand on one shore
-cannot see the other.[21]
-
-(56.) To gunpowder, as a source of mechanical power, it seems hardly
-necessary to call attention; yet it is only when we endeavour to
-_confine_ it, that we get a full conception of the immense energy of
-that astonishing agent. In count Rumford’s experiments, twenty-eight
-grains of powder confined in a cylindrical space, _which it just
-filled_, tore asunder a piece of iron which would have resisted
-a strain of 400,000 lbs.[22], applied at no greater mechanical
-disadvantage.
-
-(57.) But chemistry furnishes us with means of calling into sudden
-action forces of a character infinitely more tremendous than that
-of gunpowder. The terrific violence of the different fulminating
-compositions is such, that they can only be compared to those
-untameable animals, whose ferocious strength has hitherto defied all
-useful management, or rather to spirits evoked by the spells of a
-magician, manifesting a destructive and unapproachable power, which
-makes him but too happy to close his book, and break his wand, as the
-price of escaping: unhurt from the storm he has raised. Such powers are
-not yet subdued to our purposes, whatever they may hereafter be; but,
-in the expansive force of gases, liberated slowly and manageably from
-chemical mixtures, we have a host of inferior, yet still most powerful,
-energies, capable of being employed in a variety of useful ways,
-according to emergencies.[23]
-
-(58.) Such are the forces which nature lends us for the accomplishment
-of our purposes, and which it is the province of practical Mechanics to
-teach us to combine and apply in the most advantageous manner; without
-which the mere command of power would amount to nothing. Practical
-Mechanics is, in the most pre-eminent sense, a _scientific art_; and
-it may be truly asserted, that almost all the great combinations of
-modern mechanism, and many of its refinements and nicer improvements,
-are creations of pure intellect, grounding its exertion upon a moderate
-number of very elementary propositions in theoretical mechanics and
-geometry. On this head we might dwell long, and find ample matter,
-both for reflection and wonder; but it would require not volumes
-merely, but libraries, to enumerate and describe the prodigies of
-ingenuity which have been lavished on every thing connected with
-machinery and engineering. By these it is that we are enabled to
-diffuse over the whole earth the productions of any part of it; to fill
-every corner of it with miracles of art and labour, in exchange for its
-peculiar commodities; and to concentrate around us, in our dwellings,
-apparel and utensils, the skill and workmanship not of a few expert
-individuals, but of all who, in the present and past generations, have
-contributed their improvements to the processes of our manufactures.
-
-(59.) The transformations of chemistry, by which we are enabled to
-convert the most apparently useless materials into important objects
-in the arts, are opening up to us every day sources of wealth and
-convenience of which former ages had no idea, and which have been
-pure gifts of science to man. Every department of art has felt their
-influence, and new instances are continually starting forth of the
-unlimited resources which this wonderful science developes in the
-most sterile parts of nature. Not to mention the impulse which its
-progress has given to a host of other sciences, which will come more
-particularly under consideration in another part of this discourse,
-what strange and unexpected results has it not brought to light in its
-application to some of the most common objects! Who, for instance,
-would have conceived that linen rags were capable of producing _more
-than their own weight_ of sugar, by the simple agency of one of the
-cheapest and most abundant acids?[24]--that dry bones could be a
-magazine of nutriment, capable of preservation for years, and ready to
-yield up their sustenance in the form best adapted to the support of
-life, on the application of that powerful agent, steam, which enters
-so largely into all our processes, or of an acid at once cheap and
-durable?[25]--that sawdust itself is susceptible of conversion into
-a substance bearing no remote analogy to bread; and though certainly
-less palatable than that of flour, yet no way disagreeable, and
-both wholesome and digestible as well as highly nutritive?[26] What
-economy, in all processes where chemical agents are employed, is
-introduced by the exact knowledge of the proportions in which natural
-elements unite, and their mutual powers of displacing each other! What
-perfection in all the arts where fire is employed, either in its more
-violent applications, (as, for instance, in the smelting of metals by
-the introduction of well adapted fluxes, whereby we obtain the whole
-produce of the ore in its purest state,) or in its milder forms, as
-in sugar-refining (the whole modern practice of which depends on a
-curious and delicate remark of a late eminent scientific chemist on the
-nice adjustment of temperature at which the crystallization of syrup
-takes place); and a thousand other arts which it would be tedious to
-enumerate!
-
-(60.) Armed with such powers and resources, it is no wonder if the
-enterprise of man should lead him to form and execute projects
-which, to one uninformed of their grounds, would seem altogether
-disproportionate. Were they to have been proposed at once, we should,
-no doubt, have rejected them as such: but developed, as they have been,
-in the slow succession of ages, they have only taught us that things
-regarded impossible in one generation may become easy in the next; and
-that the power of man over nature is limited only by the one condition,
-that it must be exercised in conformity with the laws of nature. He
-must study those laws as he would the disposition of a horse he would
-ride, or the character of a nation he would govern; and the moment he
-presumes either to thwart her fundamental rules, or ventures to measure
-his strength with hers, he is at once rendered severely sensible of
-his imbecility, and meets the deserved punishment of his rashness and
-folly. But if, on the other hand, he will consent to use, without
-abusing, the resources thus abundantly placed at his disposal, and obey
-that he may command, there seems scarcely any conceivable limit to the
-degree in which the _average_ physical condition of great masses of
-mankind may be improved, their wants supplied, and their conveniences
-and comforts increased. Without adopting such an exaggerated view,
-as to assert that the meanest inhabitant of a civilized society is
-superior in physical condition to the lordly savage, whose energy and
-uncultivated ability gives him a natural predominance over his fellow
-denizens of the forest,--at least, if we compare like with like, and
-consider the multitude of human beings who are enabled, in an advanced
-state of society, to subsist in a degree of comfort and abundance,
-which at best only a few of the most fortunate in a less civilized
-state could command, we shall not be at a loss to perceive the
-principle on which we ought to rest our estimate of the advantages of
-civilization; and which applies with hardly less force to every degree
-of it, when contrasted with that next inferior, than to the broad
-distinction between civilized and barbarous life in general.
-
-(61.) The difference of the degrees in which the individuals of a great
-community enjoy the good things of life has been a theme of declamation
-and discontent in all ages; and it is doubtless our paramount duty, in
-every state of society, to alleviate the pressure of the purely evil
-part of this distribution as much as possible, and, by all the means
-we can devise, secure the lower links in the chain of society from
-dragging in dishonour and wretchedness: but there is a point of view
-in which the picture is at least materially altered in its expression.
-In comparing society on its present immense scale, with its infant
-or less developed state, we must at least take care to enlarge every
-feature in the same proportion. If, on comparing the _very_ lowest
-states in civilized and savage life, we admit a difficulty in deciding
-to which the preference is due, at least in every superior grade we
-cannot hesitate a moment; and if we institute a similar comparison in
-every different stage of its progress, we cannot fail to be struck with
-the rapid _rate of dilatation_ which every degree upward of the scale,
-so to speak, exhibits, and which, in an estimate of averages, gives
-an immense preponderance to the present over every former condition
-of mankind, and, for aught we can see to the contrary, will place
-succeeding generations in the same degree of superior relation to the
-present that this holds to those passed away. Or we may put the same
-proposition in other words, and, admitting the existence of every
-inferior grade of advantage in a higher state of civilization which
-subsisted in the preceding, we shall find, first, that, taking state
-for state, the proportional numbers of those who enjoy the higher
-degrees of advantage increases with a constantly accelerated rapidity
-as society advances; and, secondly, that the superior extremity of
-the scale is constantly enlarging by the addition of new degrees. The
-condition of a European prince is now as far superior, in the command
-of real comforts and conveniences, to that of one in the middle ages,
-as that to the condition of one of his own dependants.
-
-(62.) The advantages conferred by the augmentation of our physical
-resources through the medium of increased knowledge and improved art
-have this peculiar and remarkable property,--that they are in their
-nature diffusive, and cannot be enjoyed in any exclusive manner by a
-few. An eastern despot may extort the riches and monopolize the art
-of his subjects for his own personal use; he may spread around him an
-unnatural splendour and luxury, and stand in strange and preposterous
-contrast with the general penury and discomfort of his people; he may
-glitter in jewels of gold and raiment of needlework; but the wonders
-of well contrived and executed manufacture which we use daily, and
-the comforts which have been invented, tried, and improved upon by
-thousands, in every form of domestic convenience, and for every
-ordinary purpose of life, can never be enjoyed by him. To produce a
-state of things in which the physical advantages of civilized life
-can exist in a high degree, the stimulus of increasing comforts and
-constantly elevated desires, must have been felt by millions; since it
-is not in the power of a few individuals to create that wide demand
-for useful and ingenious applications, which alone can lead to great
-and rapid improvements, unless backed by that arising from the speedy
-diffusion of the same advantages among the mass of mankind.
-
-(63.) If this be true of physical advantages, it applies with still
-greater force to intellectual. Knowledge can neither be adequately
-cultivated nor adequately enjoyed by a few; and although the conditions
-of our existence on earth may be such as to preclude an abundant
-supply of the physical necessities of all who may be born, there
-is no such law of nature in force against that of our intellectual
-and moral wants. Knowledge is not, like food, destroyed by use, but
-rather augmented and perfected. It acquires not, perhaps, a greater
-certainty, but at least a confirmed authority and a probable duration,
-by universal assent; and there is no body of knowledge so complete,
-but that it may acquire accession, or so free from error but that it
-may receive correction in passing through the minds of millions. Those
-who admire and love knowledge for its own sake ought to wish to see
-its elements made accessible to all, were it only that they may be
-the more thoroughly examined into, and more effectually developed in
-their consequences, and receive that ductility and plastic quality
-which the pressure of minds of all descriptions, constantly moulding
-them to their purposes, can alone bestow. But to this end it is
-necessary that it should be divested, as far as possible, of artificial
-difficulties, and stripped of all such technicalities as tend to place
-it in the light of a craft and a mystery, inaccessible without a kind
-of apprenticeship. Science, of course, like every thing else, has its
-own peculiar terms, and, so to speak, its idioms of language; and these
-it would be unwise, were it even possible, to relinquish: but every
-thing that tends to clothe it in a strange and repulsive garb, and
-especially every thing that, to keep up an appearance of superiority
-in its professors over the rest of mankind, assumes an unnecessary
-guise of profundity and obscurity, should be sacrificed without mercy.
-Not to do this, is to deliberately reject the light which the natural
-unencumbered good sense of mankind is capable of throwing on every
-subject, even in the elucidation of principles: but where principles
-are to be applied to practical uses it becomes absolutely necessary;
-as all mankind have then an interest in their being so familiarly
-understood, that no mistakes shall arise in their application.
-
-(64.) The same remark applies to arts. They cannot be perfected till
-their whole processes are laid open, and their language simplified and
-rendered universally intelligible. Art is the application of knowledge
-to a practical end. If the knowledge be merely accumulated experience,
-the art is _empirical_; but if it be experience reasoned upon and
-brought under general principles, it assumes a higher character, and
-becomes a _scientific art_. In the progress of mankind from barbarism
-to civilised life, the arts necessarily precede science. The wants and
-cravings of our animal constitution must be satisfied; the comforts,
-and some of the luxuries, of life must exist. Something must be given
-to the vanity of show, and more to the pride of power: the round of
-baser pleasures must have been tried and found insufficient, before
-intellectual ones can gain a footing; and when they have obtained it,
-the delights of poetry and its sister arts still take precedence of
-contemplative enjoyments, and the severer pursuits of thought; and
-when these in time begin to charm from their novelty, and sciences
-begin to arise, they will at first be those of pure speculation. The
-mind delights to escape from the trammels which had bound it to earth,
-and luxuriates in its newly found powers. Hence, the abstractions of
-geometry--the properties of numbers--the movements of the celestial
-spheres--whatever is abstruse, remote, and extramundane--become the
-first objects of infant science. Applications come late: the arts
-continue slowly progressive, but their realm remains separated from
-that of science by a wide gulf which can only be passed by a powerful
-spring. They form their own language and their own conventions, which
-none but artists can understand. The whole tendency of empirical
-art, is to bury itself in technicalities, and to place its pride in
-particular short cuts and mysteries known only to adepts; to surprise
-and astonish by results, but conceal processes. The character of
-science is the direct contrary. It delights to lay itself open to
-enquiry, and is not satisfied with its conclusions, till it can make
-the road to them broad and beaten: and in its applications it preserves
-the same character; its whole aim being to strip away all technical
-mystery, to illuminate every dark recess, and to gain free access to
-all processes, with a view to improve them on rational principles.
-It would seem that a union of two qualities almost opposite to each
-other--a going forth of the thoughts in two directions, and a sudden
-transfer of ideas from a remote station in one to an equally distant
-one in the other--is required to start the first idea of _applying
-science_. Among the Greeks, this point was attained by Archimedes, but
-attained too late, on the eve of that great eclipse of science which
-was destined to continue for nearly eighteen centuries, till Galileo in
-Italy, and Bacon in England, at once dispelled the darkness: the one,
-by his inventions and discoveries; the other, by the irresistible force
-of his arguments and eloquence.
-
-(65.) Finally, the improvement effected in the condition of mankind
-by advances in physical science as applied to the useful purposes of
-life, is very far from being limited to their direct consequences in
-the more abundant supply of our physical wants, and the increase of our
-comforts. Great as these benefits are, they are yet but steps to others
-of a still higher kind. The successful results of our experiments and
-reasonings in natural philosophy, and the incalculable advantages which
-experience, systematically consulted and dispassionately reasoned on,
-has conferred in matters purely physical, tend of necessity to impress
-something of the well weighed and progressive character of science on
-the more complicated conduct of our social and moral relations. It
-is thus that legislation and politics become gradually regarded as
-experimental sciences; and history, not, as formerly, the mere record
-of tyrannies and slaughters, which, by immortalizing the execrable
-actions of one age, perpetuates the ambition of committing them in
-every succeeding one, but as the archive of experiments, successful
-and unsuccessful, gradually accumulating towards the solution of the
-grand problem--how the advantages of government are to be secured
-with the least possible inconvenience to the governed. The celebrated
-apophthegm, that nations never profit by experience, becomes yearly
-more and more untrue. Political economy, at least, is found to have
-sound principles, founded in the moral and physical nature of man,
-which, however lost sight of in particular measures--however even
-temporarily controverted and borne down by clamour--have yet a stronger
-and stronger testimony borne to them in each succeeding generation, by
-which they must, sooner or later, prevail. The idea once conceived and
-verified, that great and noble ends are to be achieved, by which the
-condition of the whole human species shall be permanently bettered,
-by bringing into exercise a sufficient quantity of sober thought, and
-by a proper adaptation of means, is of itself sufficient to set us
-earnestly on reflecting what ends _are_ truly great and noble, either
-in themselves, or as conducive to others of a still loftier character;
-because we are not now, as heretofore, hopeless of attaining them. It
-is not now equally harmless and insignificant, whether we are right
-or wrong; since we are no longer supinely and helplessly carried down
-the stream of events, but feel ourselves capable of buffetting at
-least with its waves, and perhaps of riding triumphantly over them:
-for why should we despair that the reason which has enabled us to
-subdue all nature to our purposes, should (if permitted and assisted
-by the providence of God) achieve a far more difficult conquest; and
-ultimately find some means of enabling the collective wisdom of mankind
-to bear down those obstacles which individual short-sightedness,
-selfishness, and passion, oppose to all improvements, and by which
-the highest hopes are continually blighted, and the fairest prospects
-marred.
-
-
-
-
- PART II.
-
- OF THE PRINCIPLES ON WHICH PHYSICAL SCIENCE RELIES FOR ITS
- SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTION, AND THE RULES BY WHICH A SYSTEMATIC
- EXAMINATION OF NATURE SHOULD BE CONDUCTED, WITH ILLUSTRATIONS OF
- THEIR INFLUENCE AS EXEMPLIFIED IN THE HISTORY OF ITS PROGRESS.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER I.
-
- OF EXPERIENCE AS THE SOURCE OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.--OF THE DISMISSAL OF
- PREJUDICES.--OF THE EVIDENCE OF OUR SENSES.
-
-
-(66.) Into abstract science, as we have before observed, the notion of
-cause does not enter. The truths it is conversant with are _necessary_
-ones, and exist independent of cause. There may be no such real _thing_
-as a right-lined triangle marked out in space; but the moment we
-conceive one in our minds, we cannot refuse to admit the sum of its
-three angles to be equal to two right angles; and if in addition we
-conceive one of its angles to be a right angle, we cannot thenceforth
-refuse to admit that the sum of the squares on the two sides, including
-the right angle, is equal to the square on the side subtending it. To
-maintain the contrary, would be, in effect, to deny its being right
-angled. No one _causes_ or _makes_ all the diameters of an ellipse
-to be bisected in its centre. To assert the contrary, would not be
-to rebel against a power, but to deny our own words. But in natural
-science _cause_ and _effect_ are the ultimate relations we contemplate;
-and _laws_, whether imposed or maintained, which, for aught we can
-perceive, might have been other than they are. This distinction is
-very important. A clever man, shut up alone and allowed unlimited
-time, might reason out for himself all the truths of mathematics, by
-proceeding from those simple notions of space and number of which he
-cannot divest himself without ceasing to think. But he could never
-tell, by any effort of reasoning, what would become of a lump of sugar
-if immersed in water, or what impression would be produced on his eye
-by mixing the colours yellow and blue.
-
-(67.) We have thus pointed out to us, as the great, and indeed only
-ultimate source of our knowledge of nature and its laws, EXPERIENCE;
-by which we mean, not the experience of one man only, or of one
-generation, but the accumulated experience of all mankind in all ages,
-registered in books or recorded by tradition. But experience may be
-acquired in two ways: either, first, by noticing facts as they occur,
-without any attempt to influence the frequency of their occurrence, or
-to vary the circumstances under which they occur; this is OBSERVATION:
-or, secondly, by putting in action causes and agents over which we
-have control, and purposely varying their combinations, and noticing
-what effects take place; this is EXPERIMENT. To these two sources we
-must look as the fountains of all natural science. It is not intended,
-however, by thus distinguishing observation from experiment, to
-place them in any kind of contrast. Essentially they are much alike,
-and differ rather in degree than in kind; so that, perhaps, the
-terms _passive_ and _active observation_ might better express their
-distinction; but it is, nevertheless, highly important to mark the
-different states of mind in inquiries carried on by their respective
-aids, as well as their different effects in promoting the progress of
-science. In the former, we sit still and listen to a tale, told us,
-perhaps obscurely, piecemeal, and at long intervals of time, with our
-attention more or less awake. It is only by after-rumination that we
-gather its full import; and often, when the opportunity is gone by, we
-have to regret that our attention was not more particularly directed to
-some point which, at the time, appeared of little moment, but of which
-we at length appretiate the importance. In the latter, on the other
-hand, we cross-examine our witness, and by comparing one part of his
-evidence with the other, while he is yet before us, and reasoning upon
-it in his presence, are enabled to put pointed and searching questions,
-the answer to which may at once enable us to make up our minds.
-Accordingly it has been found invariably, that in those departments
-of physics where the phenomena are beyond our control, or into which
-experimental enquiry, from other causes, has not been carried, the
-progress of knowledge has been slow, uncertain, and irregular; while in
-such as admit of experiment, and in which mankind have agreed to its
-adoption, it has been rapid, sure, and steady. For example, in our
-knowledge of the nature and causes of volcanoes, earthquakes, the fall
-of stones from the sky, the appearance of new stars and disappearance
-of old ones, and other of those great phenomena of nature which are
-altogether beyond our command, and at the same time are of too rare
-occurrence to permit any one to repeat and rectify his impressions
-respecting them, we know little more now than in the earliest times.
-Here our tale is told us slowly, and in broken sentences. In astronomy,
-again, we have at least an uninterrupted narrative; the opportunity
-of observation is constantly present, and makes up in some measure
-for the impossibility of varying our point of view, and calling for
-information at the precise moment it is wanted. Accordingly, astronomy,
-regarded as a science of mere observation, arrived, though by very
-slow degrees, to a state of considerable maturity. But the moment that
-it became a branch of mechanics, a science essentially experimental,
-(that is to say, one in which any principle laid down can be subjected
-to immediate and decisive _trial_, and where experience does not
-require to be waited for,) its progress suddenly acquired a tenfold
-acceleration; nay, to such a degree, that it has been asserted, and
-we believe with truth, that were the records of all observations from
-the earliest ages annihilated, leaving only those made in a single
-observatory[27], during a single lifetime[28], the whole of this most
-perfect of sciences might, from those data, and as to the objects
-included in them, be at once reconstructed, and appear precisely as
-it stood at their conclusion. To take another instance: mineralogy,
-till modern times, could hardly be said to exist. The description
-of even the precious stones in Theophrastus and Pliny are, in most
-cases, hardly sufficient to identify them, and in many fall short
-even of that humble object; more recent observers, by attending more
-carefully to the obvious characters of minerals, had formed a pretty
-extensive catalogue of them, and made various attempts to arrange and
-methodize the knowledge thus acquired, and even to deduce some general
-conclusions respecting the forms they habitually assume: but from the
-moment that chemical analysis was applied to resolve them into their
-constituent elements, and that, led by a happy accident, the genius
-of Bergmann discovered the general fact, that they could be _cloven_
-or split in such directions as to lay bare their peculiar primitive
-or fundamental forms, (which lay concealed within them, as the statue
-might be conceived encrusted in its marble envelope,)--from that
-moment, mineralogy ceased to be an unmeaning list of names, a mere
-laborious cataloguing of stones and rubbish, and became, what it now
-is, a regular, methodical, and most important science, in which every
-year is bringing to light new relations, new laws, and new practical
-applications.
-
-(68.) Experience once recognized as the fountain of all our knowledge
-of nature, it follows that, in the study of nature and its laws, we
-ought at once to make up our minds to dismiss as idle prejudices, or
-at least suspend as premature, any preconceived notion of what might
-or what ought to be the order of nature in any proposed case, and
-content ourselves with observing, as a plain matter of fact, what _is_.
-To experience we refer, as the only ground of all physical enquiry.
-But before experience itself can be used with advantage, there is one
-preliminary step to make, which depends wholly on ourselves: it is
-the absolute dismissal and clearing the mind of all prejudice, from
-whatever source arising, and the determination to stand and fall by
-the result of a direct appeal to facts in the first instance, and of
-strict logical deduction from them afterwards. Now, it is necessary
-to distinguish between two kinds of prejudices, which exercise very
-different dominion over the mind, and, moreover, differ extremely
-in the difficulty of dispossessing them, and the process to be gone
-through for that purpose. These are,--
-
- 1. Prejudices of opinion.
- 2. Prejudices of sense.
-
-(69.) By prejudices of opinion, we mean opinions hastily taken up,
-either from the assertion of others, from our own superficial views,
-or from vulgar observation, and which, from being constantly admitted
-without dispute, have obtained the strong hold of habit on our minds.
-Such were the opinions once maintained that the earth is the greatest
-body in the universe, and placed immovable in its centre, and all the
-rest of the universe created for its sole use; that it is the nature
-of fire and of sounds to ascend; that the moonlight is cold; that dews
-_fall_ from the air, &c.
-
-(70.) To combat and destroy such prejudices we may proceed in two ways,
-either by demonstrating the falsehood of the facts alleged in their
-support, or by showing how the appearances, which seem to countenance
-them, are more satisfactorily accounted for without their admission.
-But it is unfortunately the nature of prejudices of opinion to adhere,
-in a certain degree, to every mind, and to some with pertinacious
-obstinacy, _pigris radicibus_, after all ground for their reasonable
-entertainment is destroyed. Against such a disposition the student of
-natural science must contend with all his power. Not that we are so
-unreasonable as to demand of him an instant and peremptory dismission
-of all his former opinions and judgments; all we require is, that
-he will hold them without bigotry, retain till he shall see reason
-to question them, and be ready to resign them when fairly proved
-untenable, and to doubt them when the weight of probability is shown to
-lie against them. If he refuse this, he is incapable of science.
-
-(71.) Our resistance against the destruction of the other class of
-prejudices, those of sense, is commonly more violent at first, but less
-persistent, than in the case of those of opinion. Not to trust the
-evidence of our senses, seems, indeed, a hard condition, and one which,
-if proposed, none would comply with. But it is not the direct evidence
-of our senses that we are in any case called upon to reject, but only
-the erroneous judgments we unconsciously form from them, and this only
-when they can be shown to be so _by counter evidence of the same sort_;
-when one sense is brought to testify against another, for instance; or
-the same sense against itself, and the obvious conclusions in the two
-cases disagree, so as to compel us to acknowledge that one or other
-must be wrong. For example, nothing at first can seem a more rational,
-obvious, and incontrovertible conclusion, than that the _colour_ of
-an object is an inherent quality, like its weight, hardness, &c. and
-that to _see_ the object, and see it _of its own colour_, when nothing
-intervenes between our eyes and it, are one and the same thing. Yet
-this is only a prejudice; and that it is so, is shown by bringing
-forward the same sense of vision which led to its adoption, as evidence
-on the other side; for, when the differently coloured prismatic rays
-are thrown, in a dark room, in succession upon any object, whatever be
-the colour we are in the habit of calling its own, it will appear of
-the particular hue of the light which falls upon it: a yellow paper,
-for instance, will appear scarlet when illuminated by red rays, yellow
-when by yellow, green by green, and blue by blue rays; its own (so
-called) proper colour _not in the least degree mixing with that it so
-exhibits_.
-
-(72.) To give one or two more examples of the kind of illusion which
-the senses practise on us, or rather which we practise on ourselves,
-by a misinterpretation of their evidence: the moon at its rising
-and setting appears much larger than when high up in the sky. This
-is, however, a mere erroneous judgment; for when we come to measure
-its diameter, so far from finding our conclusion borne out by fact,
-we actually find it to measure materially less. Here is eyesight
-opposed to eyesight, with the advantage of deliberate measurement.
-In ventriloquism we have the hearing at variance with all the other
-senses, and especially with the sight, which is sometimes contradicted
-by it in a very extraordinary and surprising manner, as when the voice
-is made to seem to issue from an inanimate and motionless object. If
-we plunge our hands, one into ice-cold water, and the other into water
-as hot as can be borne, and, after letting them stay awhile, suddenly
-transfer them both to a vessel full of water at a blood heat, the one
-will feel a sensation of heat, the other of cold. And if we cross the
-two first fingers of one hand, and place a pea in the fork between
-them, moving and rolling it about on a table, we shall (especially if
-we close our eyes) be fully persuaded we have two peas. If the nose
-be held while we are eating cinnamon, we shall perceive no difference
-between its flavour and that of a deal shaving.
-
-(73.) These, and innumerable instances we might cite, will convince
-us, that though we are never deceived in the _sensible impression_
-made by external objects on us, yet in forming our judgments of them
-we are greatly at the mercy of circumstances, which either modify the
-impressions actually received, or combine them with adjuncts which have
-become habitually associated with different judgments; and, therefore,
-that, in estimating the degree of confidence we are to place in our
-conclusions, we must, of necessity, take into account these modifying
-or accompanying circumstances, whatever they may be. We do not, of
-course, here speak of deranged organization; such as, for instance,
-a distortion of the eye, producing double vision, and still less of
-mental delusion, which absolutely perverts the meaning of sensible
-impressions.
-
-(74.) As the mind exists not in the place of sensible objects, and
-is not brought into immediate relation with them, we can only regard
-sensible impressions as signals conveyed from them by a wonderful, and,
-to us, inexplicable mechanism, to our minds, which receives and reviews
-them, and, by habit and association, connects them with corresponding
-qualities or affections in the objects; just as a person writing down
-and comparing the signals of a telegraph might interpret their meaning.
-As, for instance, if he had constantly observed that the exhibition of
-a certain signal was sure to be followed next day by the announcement
-of the arrival of a ship at Portsmouth, he would connect the two facts
-by a link of the very same nature with that which connects the notion
-of a large wooden building, filled with sailors, with the impression of
-her outline on the retina of a spectator on the beach.
-
-(75.) In captain Head’s amusing and vivid description of his journey
-across the Pampas of South America occurs an anecdote quite in point.
-His guide one day suddenly stopped him, and, pointing high into the
-air, cried out, “A lion!” Surprised at such an exclamation, accompanied
-with such an act, he turned up his eyes, and with difficulty perceived,
-at an immeasurable height, a flight of condors soaring in circles in
-a particular spot. Beneath that spot, far out of sight of himself or
-guide, lay the carcass of a horse, and over that carcass stood (as the
-guide well knew) the lion, whom the condors were eyeing with envy from
-their airy height. The signal of the birds was to him what the sight of
-the lion alone could have been to the traveller, a full assurance of
-its existence.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. II.
-
-OF THE ANALYSIS OF PHENOMENA
-
-
-(76.) _Phenomena_, then, or appearances, as the word is literally
-rendered, are the sensible results of processes and operations carried
-on among external objects, or their constituent principles, of which
-they are only signals, conveyed to our minds as aforesaid. Now, these
-processes themselves may be in many instances rendered _sensible_;
-that is to say, analysed, and shown to consist in the motions or other
-affections of sensible objects themselves. For instance, the phenomenon
-of the sound produced by a musical string, or a bell, when struck,
-may be shown to be the result of a process consisting in the rapid
-vibratory motion of its parts communicated to the air, and thence to
-our ears; though the immediate effect on our organs of hearing does
-not excite the least idea of such a motion. On the other hand, there
-are innumerable instances of sensible impressions which (at least
-at present) we are incapable of tracing beyond the mere sensation;
-for example, in the sensations of bitterness, sweetness, &c. These,
-accordingly, if we were inclined to form hasty decisions, might be
-regarded as ultimate qualities; but the instance of sounds, just
-adduced, alone would teach us caution in such decisions, and incline
-us to believe them mere results of some secret process going on in
-our organs of taste, which is too subtle for us to trace. A simple
-experiment will serve to set this in a clearer light. A solution of
-the salt called by chemists _nitrate of silver_, and another of the
-_hyposulphite of soda_, have each of them separately, when taken into
-the mouth, a disgustingly bitter taste; but if they be mixed, or if
-one be tasted before the mouth is thoroughly cleared of the other,
-the sensible impression is that of intense sweetness. Again, the salt
-called _tungstate of soda_ when first tasted is sweet, but speedily
-changes to an intense and pure bitter, like quassia.[29]
-
-(77.) How far we may ever be enabled to attain a knowledge of the
-ultimate and inward processes of nature in the production of phenomena,
-we have no means of knowing; but, to judge from the degree of obscurity
-which hangs about the only case in which we feel within ourselves
-a _direct_ power to produce any one, there seems no great hope of
-penetrating so far. The case alluded to is the production of motion by
-the exertion of force. We are conscious of a power to move our limbs,
-and by their intervention other bodies; and that this effect is the
-result of a certain inexplicable process which we are aware of, but
-can no way describe in words, by which we exert _force_. And even when
-such exertion produces no visible effect, (as when we press our two
-hands violently together, so as just to oppose each other’s effort,) we
-still perceive, by the fatigue and exhaustion, and by the impossibility
-of maintaining the effort long, that something is going on within us,
-of which the mind is the agent, and the will the determining cause.
-This impression which we receive of the nature of force, from our own
-effort and our sense of fatigue, is quite different from that which
-we obtain of it from seeing the effect of force exerted by others in
-producing _motion_. Were there no such thing as motion, had we been
-from infancy shut up in a dark dungeon, and every limb encrusted with
-plaster, this internal consciousness would give us a complete idea
-of _force_; but when set at liberty, habit alone would enable us to
-recognize its exertion by its _signal_, motion, and _that_ only by
-finding that the same action of the mind which in our confined state
-enables us to fatigue and exhaust ourselves by the tension of our
-muscles, puts it in our power, when at liberty, to move ourselves and
-other bodies. But how obscure is our knowledge of the process going on
-within us in the exercise of this important privilege, in virtue of
-which alone we act as direct _causes_, we may judge from this, that
-when we put any limb in motion, the seat of the exertion seems to us to
-be _in_ the limb, whereas it is demonstrably no such thing, but either
-in the brain or in the spinal marrow; the proof of which is, that if a
-little fibre, called a nerve, which forms a communication between the
-limb and the brain, or spine, be divided in any part of its course,
-however we may make the effort, the limb will not move.
-
-(78.) This one instance of the obscurity which hangs about the only act
-of direct _causation_ of which we have an immediate consciousness, will
-suffice to show how little prospect there is that, in our investigation
-of nature, we shall ever be able to arrive at a knowledge of ultimate
-causes, and will teach us to limit our views to that of _laws_, and
-to the analysis of complex phenomena by which they are resolved into
-simpler ones, which, appearing to us incapable of further analysis, we
-must consent to regard as causes. Nor let any one complain of this as a
-limitation of his faculties. We have here “ample room and verge enough”
-for the full exercise of all the powers we possess; and, besides, it
-does so happen, that we are actually able to trace up a very large
-portion of the phenomena of the universe to this one _cause_, viz. the
-exertion of mechanical _force_; indeed, so large a portion, that it has
-been made a matter of speculation whether this is not the only one that
-is capable of acting on material beings.
-
-(79.) What we mean by the analysis of complex phenomena into simpler
-ones, will best be understood by an instance. Let us, therefore,
-take the phenomenon of sound, and, by considering the various cases
-in which sounds of all kinds are produced, we shall find that they
-all agree in these points:--1st, The excitement of a motion in the
-sounding body. 2dly, The communication of this motion to the air or
-other intermedium which is interposed between the sounding body and our
-ears. 3dly, The propagation of such motion from particle to particle
-of such intermedium in due succession. 4thly, Its communication, from
-the particles of the intermedium adjacent to the ear, to the ear
-itself. 5thly, Its conveyance in the ear, by a certain mechanism, to
-the auditory nerves. 6thly, The excitement of sensation. Now, in this
-analysis, we perceive that two principal matters must be understood,
-before we can have a true and complete knowledge of sound:--1st,
-The excitement and propagation of motion. 2dly, The production of
-sensation. These, then, are two other phenomena, of a simpler, or, it
-would be more correct to say, of a more general or elementary order,
-into which the complex phenomenon of sound resolves itself. But again,
-if we consider the communication of motion from body to body, or from
-one part to another of the same, we shall perceive that it is again
-resolvable into several other phenomena. 1st, The original setting in
-motion of a material body, or any part of one. 2dly, The behaviour of
-a particle set in motion, when it meets another lying in its way, or
-is otherwise impeded or influenced by its connection with surrounding
-particles. 3dly, The behaviour of the particles so impeding or
-influencing it under such circumstances; besides which, the last two
-point out another phenomenon, which it is necessary also to consider,
-viz. the phenomenon of the connection of the parts of material bodies
-in masses, by which they form aggregates, and are enabled to influence
-each other’s motions.
-
-(80.) Thus, then, we see that an analysis of the phenomenon of sound
-leads to the enquiry, 1st, of two _causes_, viz. the cause of motion,
-and the cause of sensation, these being phenomena which (at least as
-human knowledge stands at present) we are unable to analyse further;
-and, therefore, we set them down as simple, elementary, and referable,
-for any thing we can see to the contrary, to the immediate action of
-their causes. 2dly, Of several questions relating to the connection
-between the motion of material bodies and its cause, such as, _What
-will happen_ when a moving body is surrounded on all sides by others
-not in motion? _What will happen_ when a body not in motion is advanced
-upon by a moving one? It is evident that the answers to such questions
-as these can be no other than _laws of motion_, in the sense we have
-above attributed to laws of nature, viz. a statement in words of what
-will happen in such and such proposed general contingencies. Lastly,
-we are led, by pursuing the analysis, and considering the phenomenon
-of the aggregation of the parts of material bodies, and the way in
-which they influence each other, to two other general phenomena, viz.,
-the cohesion and elasticity of matter; and these we have no means
-of analysing further, and must, therefore, regard them (till we see
-reasons to the contrary) as _ultimate phenomena_, and referable to the
-direct action of causes, viz. an attractive and a repulsive _force_.
-
-(81.) Of force, as counterbalanced by opposing force, we have, as
-already said, an internal consciousness; and though it may seem strange
-to us that matter should be capable of exerting on matter the same kind
-of effort, which, judging alone from this consciousness, we might be
-led to regard as a mental one; yet we cannot refuse the direct evidence
-of our senses, which shows us that when we keep a spring stretched with
-one hand, we feel our effort opposed exactly in the same way as if we
-had ourselves opposed it with the other hand, or as it would be by
-that of another person. The enquiry, therefore, into the aggregation
-of matter resolves itself into the general question, What will be the
-behaviour of material particles under the mutual action of opposing
-forces capable of counterbalancing each other? and the answer to
-this question can be no other than the announcement of the _law_ of
-equilibrium, whatever law that may be.
-
-(82.) With regard to the cause of sensation, it must be regarded as
-much more obscure than that of motion, inasmuch as we have no conscious
-knowledge of it, _i. e._ we have no power, by any act of our minds
-and will, to call up a sensation. It is true, we are not destitute
-of an approach to it, since, by an effort of memory and imagination,
-we can produce in our minds an impression, or idea, of a sensation
-which, in peculiar cases, may even approach in vividness to actual
-reality. In dreams, too, and, in some cases of disordered nerves, we
-have sensations without objects. But if force, as a cause of motion,
-is obscure to us, even while we are in the act of exercising it, how
-much more so is this other cause, whose exercise we can only imitate
-imperfectly by any voluntary act, and of whose purely internal action
-we are only fully conscious when in a state that incapacitates us from
-reasoning, and almost from observation!
-
-(83.) Dismissing, then, as beyond our reach, the enquiry into causes,
-we must be content at present to concentrate our attention on the laws
-which prevail among phenomena, and which seem to be their immediate
-results. From the instance we have just given, we may perceive that
-every enquiry into the intimate nature of a complex phenomenon
-branches out into as many different and distinct enquiries as there
-are simple or elementary phenomena into which it may be analysed; and
-that, therefore, it would greatly assist us in our study of nature, if
-we could, by any means, ascertain what _are_ the ultimate phenomena
-into which all the composite ones presented by it may be resolved.
-There is, however, clearly no way by which this can be ascertained _à
-priori_. We must go to nature itself, and be guided by the same kind
-of rule as the chemist in his analysis, who accounts every ingredient
-an _element_ till it can be decompounded and resolved into others. So,
-in natural philosophy, we must account every phenomenon an elementary
-or simple one till we can analyse it, and show that it is the result
-of others, which in their turn become elementary. Thus, in a modified
-and relative sense, we may still continue to speak of causes, not
-intending thereby those ultimate principles of action on whose exertion
-the whole frame of nature depends, but of those proximate links which
-connect phenomena with others of a simpler, higher, and more general or
-elementary kind. For example: we may regard the vibration of a musical
-string as the proximate cause of the sound it yields, receiving it,
-so far, as an ultimate fact, and waving or deferring enquiry into the
-cause of vibrations, which is of a higher and more general nature.
-
-(84.) Moreover, as in chemistry we are sometimes compelled to
-acknowledge the existence of elements different from those already
-identified and known, though we cannot insulate them, and to perceive
-that substances have the characters of compounds, and must therefore
-be susceptible of analysis, though we do not see how it is to be set
-about; so, in physics, we may perceive the complexity of a phenomenon,
-without being able to perform its analysis. For example: in magnetism,
-the agency of electricity is clearly made out, and they are shown to
-stand to one another in the relation of effect and cause. But the
-analysis of magnetism, in its relation to particular metals, is not
-yet quite satisfactorily performed; and we are compelled to admit
-the existence of some cause, whether proximate or ultimate, whose
-presence in different metals, or in different states of the same metal,
-determines that peculiar electric condition which constitutes permanent
-magnetism. Cases like these, of all which science presents, offer the
-highest interest. They excite enquiry, like the near approach to the
-solution of an enigma; they show us that there is light, could only a
-certain veil be drawn aside.
-
-(85.) In pursuing the analysis of any phenomenon, the moment we find
-ourselves stopped by one of which we perceive no analysis, and which,
-therefore, we are forced to refer (at least provisionally) to the
-class of ultimate facts, and to regard as elementary, the study of
-that phenomenon and of its laws becomes a separate branch of science.
-If we encounter the same elementary phenomenon in the analysis of
-several composite ones, it becomes still more interesting, and assumes
-additional importance; while at the same time we acquire information
-respecting the phenomenon itself, by observing those with which it
-is habitually associated, that may help us at length to its analysis.
-It is thus that sciences increase, and acquire a mutual relation and
-dependency. It is thus, too, that we are at length enabled to trace
-parallels and analogies between great branches of science themselves,
-which at length terminate in a perception of their dependence on some
-common phenomenon of a more general and elementary nature than that
-which form the subject of either separately. It was thus, for example,
-that, previous to Oërsted’s great discovery of electro-magnetism,
-a general resemblance between the two sciences of electricity and
-magnetism was recognised, and many of the chief phenomena in each were
-ascertained to have their parallels, _mutatis mutandis_, in the other.
-It was thus, too, that an analogy subsisting between sound and light
-has been gradually traced into a closeness of agreement, which can
-hardly leave any reasonable doubt of their ultimate coincidence in one
-common phenomenon, the vibratory motion of an elastic medium. If it be
-allowed to pursue our illustration from chemistry, and to ground its
-application not on what has been, but on what may one day be, done,
-it is thus that the general family resemblance between certain groups
-of bodies, now regarded as elementary, (as nickel and cobalt, for
-instance, chlorine, iode, and brome,) will, perhaps, lead us hereafter
-to perceive relations between them of a more intimate kind than we can
-at present trace.
-
-(86.) On those phenomena which are most frequently encountered in
-an analysis of nature and which most decidedly resist further
-decomposition, it is evident that the greatest pains and attention
-ought to be bestowed, not only because they furnish a key to the
-greatest number of enquiries, and serve to group and classify together
-the greatest range of phenomena, but by reason of their higher nature,
-and because it is in these that we must look for the direct action of
-causes, and the most extensive and general enunciation of the laws of
-nature. These, once discovered, place in our power the explanation of
-all particular facts, and become grounds of reasoning, independent of
-particular trial: thus playing the same part in natural philosophy
-that axioms do in geometry; containing, in a refined and condensed
-state, and as it were in a quintessence, all that our reason has
-occasion to draw from experience to enable it to follow out the truths
-of physics by the mere application of logical argument. Indeed, the
-axioms of geometry themselves may be regarded as in some sort an appeal
-to experience, not corporeal, but mental. When we say, the whole is
-greater than its part, we announce a general fact, which rests, it
-is true, on our ideas of whole and part; but, in abstracting these
-notions, we begin by considering them as subsisting in space, and time,
-and body, and again, in linear, and superficial, and solid space.
-Again, when we say, the equals of equals are equal, we mentally make
-comparisons, in equal spaces, equal times, &c.; so that these axioms,
-however self-evident, are still general propositions so far of the
-inductive kind, that, independently of experience, they would not
-present themselves to the mind.
-
-The only difference between these and axioms obtained from extensive
-induction is this, that, in raising the axioms of geometry, the
-instances offer themselves spontaneously, and without the trouble of
-search, and are few and simple; in raising those of nature, they are
-infinitely numerous, complicated, and remote; so that the most diligent
-research and the utmost acuteness are required to unravel their web,
-and place their meaning in evidence.
-
-(87.) By far the most general phenomenon with which we are acquainted,
-and that which occurs most constantly, in every enquiry into which we
-enter, is motion, and its communication. Dynamics, then, or the science
-of force and motion, is thus placed at the head of all the sciences;
-and, happily for human knowledge, it is one in which the highest
-certainty is attainable, a certainty no way inferior to mathematical
-demonstration. As its axioms are few, simple, and in the highest degree
-distinct and definite, so they have at the same time an immediate
-relation to geometrical quantity, space, time, and direction, and
-thus accommodate themselves with remarkable facility to geometrical
-reasoning. Accordingly, their consequences may be pursued, by arguments
-purely mathematical, to any extent, insomuch that the limit of our
-knowledge of dynamics is determined only by that of pure mathematics,
-which is the case in no other branch of physical science.
-
-(88.) But, it will now be asked, how we are to proceed to analyse a
-composite phenomenon into simpler ones, and whether any general rules
-can be given for this important process? We answer, None; any more
-than (to pursue the illustration we have already had recourse to)
-general rules can be laid down by the chemist for the analysis of
-substances of which all the ingredients are unknown. Such rules, could
-they be discovered, would include the whole of natural science; but
-we are very far, indeed, from being able to propound them. However,
-we are to recollect that the analysis of phenomena, philosophically
-speaking, is principally useful, as it enables us to recognize, and
-mark for special investigation, those which appear to us simple; to
-set methodically about determining their laws, and thus to facilitate
-the work of raising up general axioms, or forms of words, which shall
-include the whole of them; which shall, as it were, transplant them
-out of the external into the intellectual world, render them creatures
-of pure thought, and enable us to reason them out _à priori_. And what
-renders the power of doing this so eminently desirable is, that, in
-thus reasoning back from generals to particulars, the propositions
-at which we arrive apply to an immense multitude of combinations and
-cases, which were never individually contemplated in the mental process
-by which our axioms were first discovered; and that, consequently, when
-our reasonings are pushed to the utmost limit of particularity, their
-results appear in the form of _individual facts_, of which we might
-have had no knowledge from immediate experience; and thus we are not
-only furnished with the explanation of all known facts, but with the
-actual discovery of such as were before unknown. A remarkable example
-of this has already been mentioned in Fresnel’s _à priori_ discovery
-of the extraordinary refraction of both rays in a doubly refracting
-medium. To give another example:--The law of gravitation is a physical
-axiom of a very high and universal kind, and has been raised by a
-succession of inductions and abstractions drawn from the observation
-of numerous facts and subordinate laws in the planetary system. When
-this law is taken for granted, and laid down as a basis of reasoning,
-and applied to the actual condition of our own planet, one of the
-consequences to which it leads is, that the earth, instead of being an
-exact sphere, must be compressed or flattened in the direction of its
-polar diameter, the one diameter being about thirty miles shorter than
-the other; and this conclusion, deduced at first by mere reasoning, has
-been since found to be true in fact. All astronomical predictions are
-examples of the same thing.
-
-(89.) In the important business of raising these axioms of nature, we
-are not, as in the analysis of phenomena, left wholly without a guide.
-The nature of abstract or general reasoning points out in a great
-measure the course we must pursue. A law of nature, being the statement
-of what will happen in certain general contingencies, may be regarded
-as the announcement, in the same words, of a whole group or class of
-phenomena. Whenever, therefore, we perceive that two or more phenomena
-agree in so many or so remarkable points, as to lead us to regard
-them as forming a class or group, if we lay out of consideration, or
-_abstract_, all the circumstances in which they disagree, and retain in
-our minds those only in which they agree, and then, under this kind of
-mental convention, frame a definition or statement of one of them, in
-such words that it shall apply equally to them all, such statement will
-appear in the form of a general proposition, having so far at least the
-character of a law of nature.
-
-(90.) For example: a great number of transparent substances, when
-exposed, in a certain particular manner, to a beam of light which has
-been prepared by undergoing certain reflexions or refractions, (and has
-thereby acquired peculiar properties, and is said to be “_polarized_,”)
-exhibit very vivid and beautiful colours, disposed in streaks, bands,
-&c. of great regularity, which seem to arise within the substance, and
-which, from a certain regular succession observed in their appearance,
-are called “periodical colours.” Among the substances which exhibit
-these periodical colours occur a great variety of transparent solids,
-but no fluids and no opake solids. Here, then, there seems to be
-sufficient community of nature to enable us to use a general term, and
-to state the proposition as a law, viz. _transparent solids_ exhibit
-periodical colours by exposure to polarized light. However, this,
-though true of many, does not apply to _all_ transparent solids, and
-therefore we cannot state it as a general truth or law of nature in
-this form; although the reverse proposition, that all solids which
-exhibit such colours in such circumstances are _transparent_, would
-be correct and general. It becomes necessary, then, to make a list of
-those to which it does apply; and thus a great number of substances of
-all kinds become grouped together, in a class linked by this common
-property. If we examine the individuals of this group, we find among
-them the utmost variety of colour, texture, weight, hardness, form and
-composition; so that, in these respects, we seem to have fallen upon
-an assemblage of contraries. But when we come to examine them closely,
-in all their properties, we find they have all one point of agreement,
-in the property of double refraction, (see page 30.) and therefore we
-may describe them all truly as _doubly refracting substances_. We may,
-therefore, state the fact in the form, “Doubly refracting substances
-exhibit periodical colours by exposure to polarized light;” and in
-this form it is found, on further examination, to be true, not only
-for those particular instances which we had in view when we first
-propounded it, but in all cases which have since occurred on further
-enquiry, without a single exception; so that the proposition is
-general, and entitled to be regarded as a law of nature.
-
-(91.) We may therefore regard a law of nature either, 1st, as a general
-proposition, announcing, in abstract terms, a whole group of particular
-facts relating to the behaviour of natural agents in proposed
-circumstances; or, 2dly, as a proposition announcing that a whole
-class of individuals agreeing in one character agree also in another.
-For example: in the case before us, the law arrived at includes, in
-its general announcement, among others, the particular facts, that
-rock crystal and saltpetre exhibit periodical colours; for these are
-both of them doubly refracting substances. Or, it may be regarded as
-announcing a relation between the two phenomena of double refraction,
-and the exhibition of periodical colours; which in the actual case is
-one of the most important, viz. the relation of _constant association_,
-inasmuch as it asserts that in whatever individual the one character is
-found, the other will invariably be found also.
-
-(92.) These two lights, in which the announcement of a general law may
-be regarded, though at bottom they come to the same thing, yet differ
-widely in their influence on our minds. The former exhibits a law as
-little more than a kind of artificial memory; but in the latter it
-becomes a step in philosophical investigation, leading directly to
-the consideration of a proximate, if not an ultimate, cause; inasmuch
-as, whenever two phenomena are observed to be invariably connected
-together, we conclude them to be related to each other, either as cause
-and effect, or as common effects of a single cause.
-
-(93.) There is still another light in which we may regard a law of
-the kind in question, viz. as a proposition asserting the mutual
-connection, or in some cases the entire identity, of two classes of
-individuals (whether individual objects or individual facts); and this
-is, perhaps, the simplest and most instructive way in which it can be
-conceived, and that which furnishes the readiest handle to further
-generalization in the raising of yet higher axioms. For example: in
-the case above mentioned, if observation had enabled us to establish
-the existence of a class of bodies possessing the property of double
-refraction, and observations of another kind had, independently of the
-former, led as to recognize a class possessing that of the exhibition
-of periodical colours in polarized light, a mere comparison of lists
-would at once demonstrate the identity of the two classes, or enable us
-to ascertain whether one was or was not included in the other.
-
-(94.) It is thus we perceive the high importance in physical science of
-just and accurate classifications of particular facts, or individual
-objects, under general well considered heads or points of agreement
-(for which there are none better adapted than the simple phenomena
-themselves into which they can be analysed in the first instance); for
-by so doing each of such phenomena, or heads of classification, becomes
-not a particular but a general fact; and when we have amassed a great
-store of such _general facts_, they become the objects of another and
-higher species of classification, and are themselves included in laws
-which, as they dispose of groups, not individuals, have a far superior
-degree of generality, till at length, by continuing the process, we
-arrive at _axioms_ of the highest degree of generality of which science
-is capable.
-
-(95.) This process is what we mean by induction; and, from what
-has been said, it appears that induction may be carried on in two
-different ways,--either by the simple juxta-position and comparison of
-ascertained classes, and marking their agreements and disagreements;
-or by considering the individuals of a class, and casting about, as
-it were to find in what particular they all agree, besides that which
-serves as their principle of classification. Either of these methods
-may be put in practice as one or the other may afford facilities in
-any case; but it will naturally happen that, where facts are numerous,
-well observed, and methodically arranged, the former will be more
-applicable than in the contrary case: the one is better adapted to the
-maturity, the other to the infancy, of science: the one employs, as an
-engine, the division of labour; the other mainly relies on individual
-penetration, and requires a union of many branches of knowledge in one
-person.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. III.
-
-OF THE STATE OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE IN GENERAL, PREVIOUS TO THE AGE OF
-GALILEO AND BACON.
-
-
-(96.) It is to our immortal countryman Bacon that we owe the broad
-announcement of this grand and fertile principle; and the developement
-of the idea, that the whole of natural philosophy consists entirely
-of a series of inductive generalizations, commencing with the most
-circumstantially stated particulars, and carried up to universal laws,
-or axioms, which comprehend in their statements every subordinate
-degree of generality, and of a corresponding series of inverted
-reasoning from generals to particulars, by which these axioms are
-traced back into their remotest consequences, and all particular
-propositions deduced from them; as well those by whose immediate
-consideration we rose to their discovery, as those of which we had
-no previous knowledge. In the course of this descent to particulars,
-we must of necessity encounter all those facts on which the arts and
-works that tend to the accommodation of human life depend, and acquire
-thereby the command of an unlimited practice, and a disposal of the
-powers of nature co-extensive with those powers themselves. A noble
-promise, indeed, and one which ought, surely, to animate us to the
-highest exertion of our faculties; especially since we have already
-such convincing proof that it is neither vain nor rash, but, on the
-contrary, has been, and continues to be, fulfilled, with a promptness
-and liberality which even its illustrious author in his most sanguine
-mood would have hardly ventured to anticipate.
-
-(97.) Previous to the publication of the Novum Organum of Bacon,
-natural philosophy, in any legitimate and extensive sense of the word,
-could hardly be said to exist. Among the Greek philosophers, of whose
-attainments in science alone, in the earlier ages of the world, we
-have any positive knowledge, and that but a very limited one, we are
-struck with the remarkable contrast between their powers of acute and
-subtle disputation, their extraordinary success in abstract reasoning,
-and their intimate familiarity with subjects purely intellectual,
-on the one hand; and, on the other, with their loose and careless
-consideration of external nature, their grossly illogical deductions of
-principles of sweeping generality from few and ill-observed facts, in
-some cases; and their reckless assumption of abstract principles having
-no foundation but in their own imaginations, in others; mere forms of
-words, with nothing corresponding to them in nature, from which, as
-from mathematical definitions, postulates, and axioms, they imagined
-that all phenomena could be derived, all the laws of nature deduced.
-Thus, for instance, having settled it in their own minds, that a
-circle is the most perfect of figures, they concluded, of course, that
-the movements of the heavenly bodies must all be performed in exact
-circles, and with uniform motions; and when the plainest observation
-demonstrated the contrary, instead of doubting the principle, they saw
-no better way of getting out of the difficulty than by having recourse
-to endless combinations of circular motions to preserve their ideal
-perfection.
-
-(98.) Undoubtedly among the Greek philosophers were many men of
-transcendent talents and virtues, the ornaments of their species,
-and justly entitled to the veneration of all posterity; but regarded
-as a body they can hardly be considered otherwise than as a knot of
-disputatious candidates for popular favour, too busy in maintaining
-their ascendency over their followers and admirers, by an ostentatious
-display of superior knowledge, to have the leisure (had they always the
-inclination) to base their pretensions on a deep and sure foundation,
-and yet too sensible of the disgrace and inconvenience of failure,
-not to defend their dogmas, however shallow, when once promulgated,
-against their keen and sagacious opponents, by every art of sophism
-or appeal to passion. Hence the crudities and chimerical views with
-which their systems of philosophy, both natural and moral, were
-overloaded; their endless disputes about verbal subtleties, and, last
-and worst, the proud assumption with which they sheltered ignorance
-and indolence under the screen of unintelligible jargon or dogmatical
-assertion. Perhaps, however, this character applies rather to the
-later than to the earlier of the Greek philosophers. The spirit of
-rational enquiry into nature seems, if we can judge from the uncertain
-and often contradictory notices handed down to us of their tenets, to
-have been far more alive, and less warped by this vain and arrogant
-turn, then than at a later period. We know not now what was the
-precise meaning attached by Thales to his opinion, that water was
-the origin of all things; but modern geologists will not be at a loss
-to conceive how an observant traveller might become impressed with
-this notion, without having recourse to the mystic records of Egypt
-or Chaldea. His ideas of eclipses and of the nature of the moon were
-sound; and his prediction of an eclipse of the sun, in particular,
-was attended with circumstances so remarkable as to have made it a
-matter of important investigation to modern astronomers. Anaxagoras,
-among a number of crude and imperfectly explained notions, speculated
-rationally enough on the cause of the winds and of the rainbow, and
-less absurdly on earthquakes than many modern geologists have done, and
-appears generally to have had his attention alive to nature, and his
-mind open to just reasoning on its phenomena; while Pythagoras, whether
-he reasoned it out for himself, or borrowed the notion from Egypt or
-India, had attained a just conception of the general disposition of
-the parts of the solar system, and the place held by the earth in it;
-nay, according to some accounts, had even raised his views so far as to
-speculate on the attraction of the sun as the bond of its union.
-
-(99.) But the successors of these _bonâ fide_ enquirers into nature
-debased the standard of truth; and, taking advantage of the credit
-justly attached to their discoveries, renounced the modest character
-of learners, and erected themselves into teachers, and, to maintain
-their pretensions to this character, adopted the tone of men who had
-nothing further to learn. Unfortunately for true science, the national
-character gave every encouragement to pretensions of this kind. That
-restless craving after novelty, which distinguished the Greeks in their
-civil and political relations, pursued them into their philosophy.
-Whatever speculations were only ingenious and new had irresistible
-charms; and the teacher who could embody a clever thought in elegant
-language, or at once save his followers and himself the trouble of
-thinking or reasoning, by bold assertion, was too often induced to
-acquire cheaply the reputation of superior knowledge, snatch a few
-superficial notions from the most ordinary and obvious facts, envelope
-them in a parade of abstruse words, declare them the primary and
-ultimate principles of all things, and denounce as absurd and impious
-all opinions opposed to his own.
-
-(100.) In this war of words the study of nature was neglected, and
-an humble and patient enquiry after facts altogether despised, as
-unworthy of the high _priori_ ground a true philosopher ought to take.
-It was the radical error of the Greek philosophy to imagine that the
-same method which proved so eminently successful in mathematical,
-would be equally so in physical, enquiries, and that, by setting out
-from a few simple and almost self-evident notions, or _axioms_, every
-thing could be reasoned out. Accordingly, we find them constantly
-straining their invention to discover these principles, which were to
-prove so pregnant. One makes _fire_ the essential matter and origin
-of the universe; another, _air_; a third, discovers the key to every
-difficulty, and the explanation of all phenomena, in the “το απειρον”
-or infinitude of things; a fourth, in the το ὁν and the το μη ὁν, that
-is to say, in entity and nonentity;--till at length an authority,
-which was destined to command opinions for nearly two thousand years,
-settled this important point, by deciding, that _matter_, _form_, and
-_privation_, were to be considered the principles of all things.
-
-(101.) It were to do injustice to Aristotle, however, to judge of him
-by _such_ a sample of his philosophy. He, at least, saw the necessity
-of having recourse to nature for something like principles of physical
-science; and, as an observer, a collector and recorder of facts and
-phenomena, stood without an equal in his age. It was the fault of that
-age, and of the perverse and flimsy style of verbal disputation which
-had infected all learning, rather than his own, that he allowed himself
-to be contented with vague and loose notions drawn from general and
-vulgar observation, in place of seeking carefully, in well arranged
-and thoroughly considered instances, for the true laws of nature. His
-voluminous works, on every department of human knowledge existing in
-his time, have nearly all perished. From his work on animals, which
-has descended to us, we are, however, enabled to appreciate his powers
-of observation; and a parallel drawn by an eminent Oxford professor
-between his classifications and those of the most illustrious of
-living naturalists, shows him to have attained a view of animated
-nature in a remarkable degree comprehensive, and which contrasts
-strikingly with the confusion, vagueness, and assumption of his
-physical opinions and dogmas. In these it is easy to recognize a mind
-not at home, and an impression of the necessity of saying something
-learned and systematic, without knowing what to say. Thus he divides
-motions into natural and unnatural; the natural motion of fire and
-light bodies being upwards, those of heavy downwards, each seeking its
-kindred nature in the heavens and the earth. Thus, too, the immediate
-impressions made on us by external objects, such as hardness, colour,
-heat, &c. are referred at once, in the Aristotelian philosophy, to
-occult qualities, in virtue of which they are as they are, and beyond
-which it is useless to enquire.[30] Of course there will occur a limit
-beyond which it _is_ useless for merely human faculties to enquire; but
-where that limit is placed, experience alone can teach us; and at least
-to assert that we _have_ attained it, is now universally recognized as
-the sure criterion of dogmatism.
-
-(102.) In the early ages of the church the writings of Aristotle were
-condemned, as allowing too much to reason and sense; and even so late
-as the twelfth century they were sought out and burned, and their
-readers excommunicated. By degrees, however, the extreme injustice
-of this impeachment of their character was acknowledged: they became
-the favourite study of the schoolmen, and furnished the keenest
-weapons of their controversy, being appealed to in all disputes as of
-sovereign authority; so that the slightest dissent from any opinion
-of the “great master,” however absurd or unintelligible, was at once
-drowned by clamour, or silenced by the still more effectual argument of
-bitter persecution. If the logic of that gloomy period could be justly
-described as “the art of talking unintelligibly on matters of which we
-are ignorant,” its physics might, with equal truth, be summed up in a
-deliberate preference of ignorance to knowledge, in matters of every
-day’s experience and use.
-
-(103.) In “this opake of nature and of soul,” the perverse activity of
-the alchemists from time to time struck out a doubtful spark[31]; and
-our illustrious countryman, Roger Bacon, shone out at the obscurest
-moment, like an early star predicting dawn. It was not, however, till
-the sixteenth century that the light of nature began to break forth
-with a regular and progressive increase. The vaunts of Paracelsus
-of the power of his chemical remedies and elixirs, and his open
-condemnation of the ancient pharmacy, backed as they were by many
-surprising cures, convinced all rational physicians that chemistry
-could furnish many excellent remedies, unknown till that time[32], and
-a number of valuable experiments began to be made by physicians and
-chemists, desirous of discovering and describing new chemical remedies.
-The chemical and metallurgic arts, exercised by persons empirically
-acquainted with their secrets, began to be seriously studied with a
-view to the acquisition of rational and useful knowledge, and regular
-treatises on branches of natural science at length to appear. George
-Agricola, in particular, devoted himself with ardour to the study
-of mineralogy and metallurgy in the mining districts of Bohemia and
-Schemnitz, and published copious and methodical accounts of all
-the facts within his knowledge: and our countryman, Dr. Gilbert of
-Colchester, in 1590, published a treatise on magnetism, full of
-valuable facts and experiments, ingeniously reasoned on; and he
-likewise extended his enquiries to a variety of other subjects, in
-particular to electricity.
-
-(104.) But, as the decisive mark of a great commencing change in the
-direction of the human faculties, astronomy, the only science in which
-the ancients had made any real progress, and ascended to any thing like
-large and general conceptions, began once more to be studied in the
-best spirit of a candid philosophy; and the Copernican or Pythagorean
-system arose or revived, and rapidly gained advocates. Galileo at
-length appeared, and openly attacked and refuted the Aristotelian
-dogmas respecting motion, by direct appeal to the evidence of sense,
-and by experiments of the most convincing kind. The persecutions
-which such a step drew upon him, the record of his perseverance and
-sufferings, and the ultimate triumph of his opinions and reasonings,
-have been too lately and too well related[33] to require repetition
-here.
-
-(105.) By the discoveries of Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo, the
-errors of the Aristotelian philosophy were effectually overturned on a
-plain appeal to the facts of nature; but it remained to show on broad
-and general principles, how and why Aristotle was in the wrong; to set
-in evidence the peculiar weakness of his method of philosophizing,
-and to substitute in its place a stronger and better. This important
-task was executed by Francis Bacon, Lord Verulam, who will, therefore,
-justly be looked upon in all future ages as the great reformer of
-philosophy, though his own actual contributions to the stock of
-physical truths were small, and his ideas of particular points strongly
-tinctured with mistakes and errors, which were the fault rather of the
-general want of physical information of the age than of any narrowness
-of view on his own part; and of this he was fully aware. It has been
-attempted by some to lessen the merit of this great achievement, by
-showing that the inductive method had been practised in many instances,
-both ancient and modern, by the mere instinct of mankind; but it is not
-the introduction of inductive reasoning, as a new and hitherto untried
-process, which characterizes the Baconian philosophy, but his keen
-perception, and his broad and spirit-stirring, almost enthusiastic,
-announcement of its paramount importance, as the alpha and omega of
-science, as the grand and only chain for the linking together of
-physical truths, and the eventual key to every discovery and every
-application. Those who would deny him his just glory on such grounds
-would refuse to Jenner or to Howard their civic crowns, because a few
-farmers in a remote province had, time out of mind, been acquainted
-with vaccination, or philanthropists, in all ages, had occasionally
-visited the prisoner in his dungeon.
-
-(106.) An immense impulse was now given to science, and it seemed as
-if the genius of mankind, long pent up, had at length rushed eagerly
-upon Nature, and commenced, with one accord, the great work of
-turning up her hitherto unbroken soil, and exposing the treasures
-so long concealed. A general sense now prevailed of the poverty and
-insufficiency of existing knowledge in _matters of fact_; and, as
-information flowed fast in, an era of excitement and wonder commenced,
-to which the annals of mankind had furnished nothing similar. It
-seemed, too, as if Nature herself seconded the impulse; and, while
-she supplied new and extraordinary aids to those senses which were
-henceforth to be exercised in her investigation,--while the telescope
-and the microscope laid open _the infinite_ in both directions,--as
-if to call attention to her wonders, and signalize the epoch, she
-displayed the rarest, the most splendid and mysterious, of all
-astronomical phenomena, the appearance and subsequent total extinction
-of a new and brilliant fixed star twice within the lifetime of Galileo
-himself.[34]
-
-(107.) The immediate followers of Bacon and Galileo ransacked all
-nature for new and surprising facts, with something of that craving
-for the marvellous, which might be regarded as a remnant of the age of
-alchemy and natural magic, but which, under proper regulation, is a
-most powerful and useful stimulus to experimental enquiry. Boyle, in
-particular, seemed animated by an enthusiasm of ardour, which hurried
-him from subject to subject, and from experiment to experiment,
-without a moment’s intermission, and with a sort of undistinguishing
-appetite; while Hooke (the great contemporary, and almost the worthy
-rival, of Newton) carried a keener eye of scrutinizing reason into a
-range of research even yet more extensive. As facts multiplied, leading
-phenomena became prominent, laws began to emerge, and generalizations
-to commence; and so rapid was the career of discovery, so signal the
-triumph of the inductive philosophy, that a single generation and the
-efforts of a single mind sufficed for the establishment of the system
-of the universe, on a basis never after to be shaken.
-
-(108.) We shall now endeavour to enumerate and explain in detail the
-principal steps by which legitimate and extensive inductions are
-arrived at, and the processes by which the mind, in the investigation
-of natural laws, purges itself by successive degrees of the
-superfluities and incumbrances which hang about particulars, and
-obscure the perception of their points of resemblance and connection.
-We shall state the helps which may be afforded us, in a work of so
-much thought and labour, by a methodical course of proceeding, and
-by a careful notice of those means which have at any time been found
-successful, with a view to their better understanding and adaptation
-to other cases: a species of mental induction of no mean utility and
-extent in itself; inasmuch as by pursuing it alone we can attain a more
-intimate knowledge than we actually possess of the laws which regulate
-our discovery of truth, and of the rules, so far as they extend, to
-which invention is reducible. In doing this, we shall commence at the
-beginning, with experience itself, considered as the accumulation of
-the knowledge of individual objects and facts.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. IV.
-
-OF THE OBSERVATION OF FACTS AND THE COLLECTION OF INSTANCES.
-
-
-(109.) Nature offers us two sorts of subjects of contemplation in the
-external world,--objects, and their mutual actions. But, after what
-has been said on the subject of sensation, the reader will be at no
-loss to perceive that we know nothing of the objects themselves which
-compose the universe, except through the medium of the impressions they
-excite in us, which impressions are the results of certain actions and
-processes in which sensible objects and the material parts of ourselves
-are directly concerned. Thus, our observation of external nature is
-limited to the mutual action of material objects on one another; and
-to facts, that is, the associations of phenomena or appearances. We
-gain no information by perceiving merely that an object is black; but
-if we also perceive it to be fluid, we at least acquire the knowledge
-that blackness is not incompatible with fluidity, and have thus made
-a step, however trifling, to a knowledge of the more intimate nature
-of these two qualities. Whenever, therefore, we would either analyse
-a phenomenon into simpler ones, or ascertain what is the course or
-law of nature under any proposed general contingency, the first step
-is to accumulate a sufficient quantity of well ascertained facts or
-recorded instances, bearing on the point in question. Common sense
-dictates this, as affording us the means of examining the same subject
-in several points of view; and it would also dictate, that the more
-different these collected facts are in all other circumstances but that
-which forms the subject of enquiry, the better; because they are then
-in some sort brought into contrast with one another in their points of
-disagreement, and thus tend to render those in which they agree more
-prominent and striking.
-
-(110.) The only facts which can ever become useful as grounds of
-physical enquiry are those which happen uniformly and invariably
-under the same circumstances. This is evident: for if they have
-not this character they cannot be included in laws; they want that
-universality which fits them to enter as elementary particles into the
-constitution of those universal axioms which we aim at discovering.
-If one and the same result does not constantly happen under a given
-combination of circumstances, apparently the same, one of two things
-must be supposed,--caprice (_i. e._ the arbitrary intervention of
-mental agency), or differences in the circumstances themselves,
-really existing, but unobserved by us. In either case, though we may
-record such facts as curiosities, or as awaiting explanation when
-the difference of circumstances shall be understood, we can make
-no use of them in scientific enquiry. Hence, whenever we notice a
-remarkable effect of any kind, our first question ought to be, Can it
-be reproduced? What are the circumstances under which it has happened?
-And will it _always_ happen again if those circumstances, so far as we
-have been able to collect them, co-exist?
-
-(111.) The circumstances, then, which accompany any observed fact, are
-main features in its observation, at least until it is ascertained
-by sufficient experience what circumstances have nothing to do with
-it, and might therefore have been left unobserved without sacrificing
-_the fact_. In observing and recording a fact, therefore, altogether
-new, we ought not to omit any circumstance capable of being noted,
-lest some one of the omitted circumstances should be essentially
-connected with the fact, and its omission should, therefore, reduce
-the implied statement of a _law of nature_ to the mere record of an
-_historical event_. For instance, in the fall of meteoric stones,
-flashes of fire are seen proceeding from a cloud, and a loud rattling
-noise like thunder is heard. These circumstances, and the sudden stroke
-and destruction ensuing, long caused them to be confounded with an
-effect of lightning, and called thunderbolts. But one circumstance is
-enough to mark the difference: the flash and sound have been perceived
-occasionally to emanate from a _very small cloud_ insulated in _a clear
-sky_; a combination of circumstances which never happens in a thunder
-storm, but which is undoubtedly intimately connected with their real
-origin.
-
-(112.) Recorded observation consists of two distinct parts: 1st, an
-exact notice of the thing observed, and of all the particulars which
-may be supposed to have any natural connection with it; and, 2dly, a
-true and faithful record of them. As our senses are the only inlets
-by which we receive impressions of facts, we must take care, in
-observing, to have them all in activity, and to let nothing escape
-notice which affects any one of them. Thus, if lightning were to
-strike the house we inhabit, we ought to notice what kind of light we
-saw--whether a sheet of flame, a darting spark, or a broken zig-zag;
-in what direction moving, to what objects adhering, its colour, its
-duration, &c.; what sounds were heard--explosive, crashing, rattling,
-momentary, or gradually increasing and fading, &c.; whether any smell
-of fire was perceptible, and if sulphureous, metallic, or such as
-would arise merely from substances scorched by the flash, &c.; whether
-we felt any shock, stroke, or peculiar sensation, or experienced any
-strange taste in our mouths. Then, besides detailing the effects of the
-stroke, all the circumstances which might in any degree seem likely to
-attract, produce, or modify it, such as the presence of conductors,
-neighbouring objects, the state of the atmosphere, the barometer,
-thermometer, &c., and the disposition of the clouds, should be noted;
-and after all this particularity, the question _how_ the house _came
-to be struck?_ might ultimately depend on the fact that a flash of
-lightning twenty miles off passed at that particular moment _from
-the ground to the clouds_, by an effect of what has been termed the
-returning stroke.
-
-(113.) A writer in the Edinburgh Philosophical Journal[35] states
-himself to have been led into a series of investigations on the
-chemical nature of a peculiar acid, by noticing, accidentally, a bitter
-taste in a liquid about to be thrown away. Chemistry is full of such
-incidents.
-
-(114.) In transient phenomena, if the number of particulars be
-great, and the time to observe them short, we must consult our
-memory before they have had time to fade, or refresh it by placing
-ourselves as nearly as possible in the same circumstances again; go
-back to the spot, for instance, and try the words of our statement
-by appeal to all remaining indications, &c. This is most especially
-necessary where we have not observed ourselves, but only collect and
-record the observations of others, particularly of illiterate or
-prejudiced persons, on any rare phenomenon, such as the passing of
-a great meteor,--the fall of a stone from the sky,--the shock of an
-earthquake,--an extraordinary hailstorm, &c.
-
-(115.) In all cases which admit of numeration or measurement, it is of
-the utmost consequence to obtain precise numerical statements, whether
-in the measure of time, space, or quantity of any kind. To omit this,
-is, in the first place, to expose ourselves to illusions of sense which
-may lead to the grossest errors. Thus, in alpine countries, we are
-constantly deceived in heights and distances; and when we have overcome
-the first impression which leads us to under-estimate them, we are then
-hardly less apt to run into the opposite extreme. But it is not merely
-in preserving us from exaggerated impressions that numerical precision
-is desirable. It is the very soul of science; and its attainment
-affords the only criterion, or at least the best, of the truth of
-theories, and the correctness of experiments. Thus, it was entirely
-to the omission of exact numerical determinations of quantity that the
-mistakes and confusion of the Stahlian chemistry were attributable,--a
-confusion which dissipated like a morning mist as soon as precision,
-in this respect, came to be regarded as essential. Chemistry is in the
-most pre-eminent degree a science of quantity; and to enumerate the
-discoveries which have arisen in it, from the mere determination of
-weights and measures, would be nearly to give a synopsis of this branch
-of knowledge. We need only mention the law of definite proportions,
-which fixes the composition of every body in nature in determinate
-proportional weights of its ingredients.
-
-(116.) Indeed, it is a character of all the higher laws of nature to
-assume the form of precise _quantitative_ statement. Thus, the law of
-gravitation, the most universal truth at which human reason has yet
-arrived, expresses not merely the general fact of the mutual attraction
-of all matter; not merely the vague statement that its influence
-decreases as the distance increases, but the exact numerical rate at
-which that decrease takes place; so that when its amount is known at
-any one distance it may be calculated exactly for any other. Thus, too,
-the laws of crystallography, which limit the forms assumed by natural
-substances, when left to their own inherent powers of aggregation, to
-precise geometrical figures, with fixed angles and proportions, have
-the same essential character of strict mathematical expression, without
-which no exact particular conclusions could ever be drawn from them.
-
-(117.) But, to arrive at laws of this description, it is evident that
-every step of our enquiry must be perfectly free from the slightest
-degree of looseness and indecision, and carry with it the full force of
-strict numerical announcement; and that, therefore, the observations
-themselves on which all laws ultimately rest ought to have the same
-property. None of our senses, however, gives us direct information
-for the exact comparison of quantity. Number, indeed, that is to
-say, integer number, is an object of sense, because we can count;
-but we can neither weigh, measure, nor form any precise estimate of
-fractional parts by the unassisted senses. Scarcely any man could tell
-the difference between twenty pounds and the same weight increased or
-diminished by a few ounces; still less could he judge of the proportion
-between an ounce of gold and a hundred grains of cotton by balancing
-them in his hands. To take another instance: the eye is no judge of the
-proportion of different degrees of illumination, even when seen side
-by side; and if an interval elapses, and circumstances change, nothing
-can be more vague than its judgments. When we gaze with admiration
-at the gorgeous spectacle of the golden clouds at sunset, which seem
-drenched in light and glowing like flames of real fire, it is hardly
-by any effort we can persuade ourselves to regard them as the very
-same objects which at noonday pass unnoticed as mere white clouds
-basking in the sun, only participating, from their great horizontal
-distance, in the ruddy tint which luminaries acquire by shining through
-a great extent of the vapours of the atmosphere, and thereby even
-losing something of their light. So it is with our estimates of time,
-velocity, and all other matters of quantity; they are absolutely vague,
-and inadequate to form a foundation for any exact conclusion.
-
-(118.) In this emergency we are obliged to have recourse to
-instrumental aids, that is, to contrivances which shall substitute for
-the vague impressions of sense the precise one of number, and reduce
-all measurement to counting. As a first preliminary towards effecting
-this, we fix on convenient _standards_ of weight, dimension, time,
-&c., and invent contrivances for readily and correctly repeating them
-as often as we please, and counting how often such a standard unit is
-contained in the thing, be it weight, space, time, or angle, we wish to
-measure; and if there be a fractional part over, we measure this as a
-new quantity by aliquot parts of the former standard.
-
-(119.) If every scientific enquirer observed only for his own
-satisfaction, and reasoned only on his own observations, it would be
-of little importance what standards he used, or what contrivances (if
-only just ones) he employed for this purpose; but if it be intended
-(as it is most important they should) that observations once made
-should remain as records to all mankind, and to all posterity, it is
-evidently of the highest consequence that all enquirers should agree on
-the use of a common standard, and that this should be one not liable
-to change by lapse of time. The selection and verification of such
-standards, however, will easily be understood to be a matter of extreme
-difficulty, if only from the mere circumstance that, to verify the
-permanence of one standard, we must compare it with others, which it
-is possible may be themselves inaccurate, or, at least, stand in need
-of verification.
-
-(120.) Here we can only call to our assistance the presumed permanence
-of the great laws of Nature, with all experience in its favour, and the
-strong impression we have of the general composure and steadiness of
-every thing relating to the gigantic mass we inhabit--“the great globe
-itself.” In its uniform rotation on its axis, accordingly, we find a
-standard of time, which nothing has ever given us reason to regard
-as subject to change, and which, compared with other periods which
-the revolutions of the planets about the sun afford, has demonstrably
-undergone none since the earliest history. In the dimensions of the
-earth we find a natural unit of the measure of space, which possesses
-in perfection every quality that can be desired; and in its attraction
-combined with its rotation the researches of dynamical science have
-enabled us, through the medium of the pendulum, to obtain another
-invariable standard, more refined and less obvious, it is true, in
-its origin, but possessing a great advantage in its capability of
-ready verification, and therefore easily made to serve as a check on
-the other. The former, viz. direct measurement of the dimensions of
-the earth, is the origin of the _mètre_, the French unit of linear
-measure; the latter, of the British yard. Theoretically speaking,
-they are equally eligible; but when we consider that the _quantity
-directly measured_, in the case of the mètre, is a length a great many
-thousand times the final unit, and in the pendulum or yard very nearly
-the unit itself, there can be no hesitation in giving the preference
-as an original measure to the former, because any error committed in
-the process by which that is determined becomes subdivided in the
-final result; while, on the other hand, any minute error committed
-in determining the length of the pendulum becomes multiplied by the
-repetition of the unit in all measurements of considerable lengths
-performed in yards.
-
-(121.) The same admirable invention of the pendulum affords a means of
-subdividing time to an almost unlimited nicety. A clock is nothing more
-than a piece of mechanism for counting the oscillations of a pendulum;
-and by that peculiar property of the pendulum, that one vibration
-commences exactly where the last terminates, no part of time is lost
-or gained in the juxta-position of the units so counted, so that the
-precise fractional part of a day can be ascertained which each such
-unit measures.
-
-(122.) It is owing to this peculiar property by which the
-_juxta-position_ of units of time and weight can be performed _without
-error_, that the whole of the accuracy with which time and weight can
-be multiplied and subdivided is owing.[36] The same thing cannot be
-accomplished in _space_, by any method we are yet acquainted with, so
-that our means of subdividing space are much inferior in precision.
-The beautiful principle of repetition, invented by Borda, offers the
-nearest approach to it, but cannot be said to be absolutely free from
-the source of error in question. The method of “double weighing,” which
-we owe to the same distinguished observer, affords an instance of the
-direct comparison of two equal weights independent of almost every
-source of error which can affect the comparison of one object with
-another. It has been remarked by Biot, that previous to the invention
-of this elegant method, instruments afforded no perfect means of
-ascertaining the weight of a body.
-
-(123.) But it is not enough to possess a standard of this abstract
-kind: a real material measure must be constructed, and exact copies of
-it taken. This, however, is not very difficult; the great difficulty
-is to preserve it unaltered from age to age; for unless we transmit to
-posterity the units of our measurements, _such as we have ourselves
-used them_, we, in fact, only half bequeath to them our observations.
-This is a point too much lost sight of, and it were much to be wished
-that some direct provision for so important an object were made.[37]
-
-(124.) But, it may be asked, if our measurement of quantity is thus
-unavoidably liable to error, how is it possible that our observations
-can possess that quality of numerical veracity which is requisite to
-render them the foundation of laws, whose distinguishing perfection
-consists in their strict mathematical expression? To this the reply is
-twofold. 1st, that though we admit the necessary existence of numerical
-error in every observation, we can always assign a limit which such
-error cannot possibly exceed; and the extent of this _latitude of
-error of observation_ is less in proportion to the perfection of
-the instrumental means we possess, and the care bestowed on their
-employment. In the greater part of modern measurements it is, in point
-of fact, extremely minute, and may be still further diminished, almost
-to any required extent, by repeating the measurements a great number of
-times, and under a great variety of circumstances, and taking a mean of
-the results, when errors of opposite kinds will, at length, compensate
-each other. But, 2dly, there exists a much more fundamental reply to
-this objection. In reasoning upon our observations, the existence and
-possible amount of quantitative error is always to be allowed for; and
-the extent to which theories may be affected by it is never to be lost
-sight of. In reasoning upwards, from observations confessedly imperfect
-to general laws, we must take care always to regard our conclusions
-as conditional, so far as they may be affected by such unavoidable
-imperfections; and when at length we shall have arrived at our highest
-point, and attained to axioms which admit of general and deductive
-reasoning, the question, whether they _are_ vitiated by the errors of
-observation or not, will still remain to be decided, and must become
-the object of subsequent verification. This point will be made the
-subject of more distinct consideration hereafter, when we come to speak
-of the verification of theories and the laws of probability.
-
-(125.) With respect to our record of observations, it should be not
-only circumstantial but _faithful_; by which we mean, that it should
-contain all we did _observe_, and nothing else. Without any intention
-of falsifying our record, we may do so unperceived by ourselves, owing
-to a mixture of the views and language of an erroneous theory with
-that of simple fact. Thus, for example, if, in describing the effect
-of lightning, we should say, “The thunderbolt struck with violence
-against the side of the house, and beat in the wall,” a fact would be
-stated which we did not see, and would lead our hearers to believe that
-a solid or ponderable projectile was concerned. The “strong smell of
-sulphur,” which is sometimes said to accompany lightning, is a remnant
-of the theory which made thunder and lightning the explosion of a kind
-of aërial gunpowder, composed of sulphureous and nitrous exhalations.
-There are some subjects particularly infested with this mixture of
-theory in the statement of observed fact. The older chemistry was
-so overborne by this mischief, as quite to confound and nullify the
-descriptions of innumerable curious and laborious experiments. And in
-geology, till a very recent period, it was often extremely difficult,
-from this circumstance, to know what _were_ the facts observed. Thus,
-Faujas de St. Fond, in his work on the volcanoes of central France,
-describes with every appearance of minute precision craters existing
-no where but in his own imagination. There is no greater fault (direct
-falsification of fact excepted) which can be committed by an observer.
-
-(126.) When particular branches of science have acquired that degree
-of consistency and generality, which admits of an abstract statement
-of laws, and legitimate deductive reasoning, the principle of the
-division of labour tends to separate the province of the observer from
-that of the theorist. There is no accounting for the difference of
-minds or inclinations, which leads one man to observe with interest
-the developements of phenomena, another to speculate on their causes;
-but were it not for this happy disagreement, it may be doubted whether
-the higher sciences could ever have attained even their present degree
-of perfection. As laws acquire generality, the influence of individual
-observations becomes less, and a higher and higher degree of
-refinement in their performance, as well as a great multiplication in
-their number, becomes necessary to give them importance. In astronomy,
-for instance, the superior departments of theory are completely
-disjoined from the routine of practical observation.
-
-(127.) To make a perfect observer, however, either in astronomy
-or in any other department of science, an extensive acquaintance
-is requisite, not only with the particular science to which his
-observations relate, but with every branch of knowledge which may
-enable him to appretiate and neutralize the effect of extraneous
-disturbing causes. Thus furnished, he will be prepared to seize on any
-of those minute indications, which (such is the subtlety of nature)
-often connect phenomena which seem quite remote from each other. He
-will have his eyes as it were opened, that they may be struck at once
-with any occurrence which, according to received theories, ought
-not to happen; for these are the facts which serve as clews to new
-discoveries. The deviation of the magnetic needle, by the influence
-of an electrified wire, must have happened a thousand times to a
-perceptible amount, under the eyes of persons engaged in galvanic
-experiments, with philosophical apparatus of all kinds standing around
-them; but it required the eye of a philosopher such as Oërsted to
-seize the indication, refer it to its origin, and thereby connect
-two great branches of science. The grand discovery of Malus of the
-polarization of light by reflection originated in his casual remark of
-the disappearance of one of the images of a window in the Luxembourg
-palace, one evening, when strongly illuminated by the setting sun,
-viewed through a doubly refracting prism.
-
-(128.) To avail ourselves as far as possible of the advantages which
-a division of labour may afford for the collection of facts, by the
-industry and activity which the general diffusion of information,
-in the present age, brings into exercise, is an object of great
-importance. There is scarcely any well-informed person, who, if he
-has but the will, has not also the power to add something essential
-to the general stock of knowledge, if he will only observe regularly
-and methodically some particular class of facts which may most excite
-his attention, or which his situation may best enable him to study
-with effect. To instance one or two subjects, which can only be
-effectually improved by the united observations of great numbers widely
-dispersed:--Meteorology, one of the most complicated but important
-branches of science, is at the same time one in which any person
-who will attend to plain rules, and bestow the necessary degree of
-attention, may do effectual service. What benefits has not Geology
-reaped from the activity of industrious individuals, who, setting
-aside all theoretical views, have been content to exercise the useful
-and highly entertaining occupation of collecting specimens from the
-countries which they visit? In short, there is no branch of science
-whatever in which, at least, if useful and sensible queries were
-distinctly proposed, an immense mass of valuable information might not
-be collected from those who, in their various lines of life, at home
-or abroad, stationary or in travel, would gladly avail themselves of
-opportunities of being useful. Nothing would tend better to attain
-this end than the circulation of printed skeleton forms, on various
-subjects, which should be so formed as, 1st, to ask distinct and
-pertinent questions, admitting of short and definite answers; 2dly, To
-call for exact numerical statement on all principal points; 3dly, To
-point out the attendant circumstances most likely to prove influential,
-and which ought to be observed; 4thly, To call for their transmission
-to a common centre.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. V.
-
-OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF NATURAL OBJECTS AND PHENOMENA, AND OF
-NOMENCLATURE.
-
-
-(129.) The number and variety of objects and relations which the
-observation of nature brings before us are so great as to distract
-the attention, unless assisted and methodized by such judicious
-distribution of them in classes as shall limit our view to a few at
-a time, or to groups so bound together by general resemblances that,
-for the immediate purpose for which we consider them, they may be
-regarded as individuals. Before we can enter into any thing which
-deserves to be called a general and systematic view of nature, it is
-necessary that we should possess an enumeration, if not complete, at
-least of considerable extent, of her materials and combinations; and
-that those which appear in any degree important should be distinguished
-by names which may not only tend to fix them in our recollection,
-but may constitute, as it were, nuclei or centres, about which
-information may collect into masses. The imposition of a name on any
-subject of contemplation, be it a material object, a phenomenon of
-nature, or a group of facts and relations, looked upon in a peculiar
-point of view, is an epoch in its history of great importance. It not
-only enables us readily to refer to it in conversation or writing,
-without circumlocution, but, what is of more consequence, it gives
-it a recognized existence in our own minds, as a matter for separate
-and peculiar consideration; places it on a list for examination;
-and renders it a head or title, under which information of various
-descriptions may be arranged; and, in consequence, fits it to perform
-the office of a connecting link between all the subjects to which such
-information may refer.
-
-(130.) For these purposes, however, a temporary or provisional name,
-or one adapted for common parlance, may suffice. But when a very great
-multitude of objects come to be referred to one class, especially of
-such as do not offer very obvious and remarkable distinctions, a more
-systematic and regular nomenclature becomes necessary, in which the
-names shall recall the differences as well as the resemblances between
-the individuals of a class, and in which the direct relation between
-the name and the object shall materially assist the solution of the
-problem, “_given the one, to determine the other_.” How necessary
-this may become, will be at once seen, when we consider the immense
-number of individual objects, or rather species, presented by almost
-every branch of science of any extent; which absolutely require to be
-distinguished by names. Thus, the botanist is conversant with from
-80,000 to 100,000 species of plants; the entomologist with, perhaps,
-as many, of insects: the chemist has to register the properties of
-combinations, by twos, threes, fours, and upwards, in various doses
-of upwards of fifty different elements, all distinguished from each
-other by essential differences; and of which though a great many
-thousands are known, by far the greater part have never yet been
-formed, although hundreds of new ones are coming to light, in perpetual
-succession, as the science advances; all of which are to be named as
-they arise. The objects of astronomy are, literally, as numerous as the
-stars of heaven; and although not more than one or two thousand require
-to be expressed by distinct names, yet the number, respecting which
-particular information is required, is not less than a hundred times
-that amount; and all these must be registered in lists, (so as to be
-at once referred to, and so that none shall escape,) if not by actual
-names, at least by some equivalent means.
-
-(131.) Nomenclature, then, is, in itself, undoubtedly an important
-part of science, as it prevents our being lost in a wilderness of
-particulars, and involved in inextricable confusion. Happily, in those
-great branches of science where the objects of classification are most
-numerous, and the necessity for a clear and convenient nomenclature
-most pressing, no very great difficulty in its establishment is felt.
-The very multitude of the objects themselves affords the power of
-grouping them in subordinate classes, sufficiently well defined to
-admit of names, and these again into others, whose names may become
-attached to, or compounded with, the former, till at length the
-particular species is identified. The facility with which the botanist,
-the entomologist, or the chemist, refers by name to any individual
-object in his science shows what may be accomplished in this way
-when characters are themselves distinct. In other branches, however,
-considerable difficulty is experienced. This arises mostly where the
-species to be distinguished are separated from each other chiefly by
-difference in degree, of certain qualities common to all, and where the
-degrees shade into each other insensibly. Perhaps such subjects can
-hardly be considered ripe for systematic nomenclature; and that the
-attempt to apply it ought only to be partial, embracing such groups
-and parcels of individuals as agree in characters evidently natural
-and generic, and leaving the remainder under trivial or provisional
-denominations, till they shall be better known, and capable of being
-scientifically grouped.
-
-(132.) Indeed, nomenclature, in a systematic point of view, is as
-much, perhaps more, a consequence than a cause of extended knowledge.
-Any one may give an arbitrary name to a thing, merely to be able to
-talk of it; but, to give a name which shall at once refer it to a
-place in a system, we must know its properties; and we must _have_ a
-system, large enough, and regular enough, to receive it in a place
-which belongs to it, and to no other. It appears, therefore, doubtful
-whether it is desirable, for the essential purposes of science, that
-extreme refinement in systematic nomenclature should be insisted on.
-Were science perfect, indeed, systems of classification might be
-agreed on, which should assign to every object in nature a place in
-some class, to which it more remarkably and pre-eminently belonged
-than to any other, and under which it might acquire a name, never
-afterwards subject to change. But, so long as this is not the case,
-and new relations are daily discovered, we must be very cautious how
-we insist strongly on the establishment and extension of classes
-which have in them any thing artificial, as a basis of a rigid
-nomenclature; and especially how we mistake the means for the end, and
-sacrifice convenience and distinctness to a rage for arrangement. Every
-nomenclature dependent on artificial classifications is necessarily
-subject to fluctuations; and hardly any thing can counterbalance the
-evil of disturbing well-established names, which have once acquired a
-general circulation. In nature, one and the same object makes a part of
-an infinite number of different systems,--an individual in an infinite
-number of groups, some of greater, some of less importance, according
-to the different points of view in which they may be considered. Hence,
-as many different systems of nomenclature may be imagined as there can
-be discovered different heads of classification, while yet it is highly
-desirable that each object should be universally spoken of under one
-name, _if possible_. Consequently, in all subjects where comprehensive
-heads of classification do not prominently offer themselves, all
-nomenclature must be a balance of difficulties, and a good, short,
-_unmeaning_ name, which has once obtained a footing in usage, is
-preferable to almost any other.
-
-(133.) There is no science in which the evils resulting from a rage for
-nomenclature have been felt to such an extent as in mineralogy. The
-number of simple minerals actually recognised by mineralogists does not
-exceed a few hundreds, yet there is scarcely one which has not four or
-five names in different books. The consequence is most unhappy. No name
-is suffered to endure long enough to take root; and every new writer
-on this interesting science begins, as a matter of course, by making a
-_tabula rasa_ of all former nomenclature, and proposing a new one in
-its place. The climax has at length been put to this most inconvenient
-and bewildering state of things by the appearance of a system supported
-by extraordinary merit in other respects, and therefore carrying
-the highest authority, in which names which had acquired universal
-circulation, and had hitherto maintained their ground in the midst of
-the general confusion, and even worked their way into common language,
-as denotive of _species_ too definite to admit of mistake, are actually
-rendered _generic_, and extended to whole groups, comprising objects
-agreeing in nothing but the arbitrary heads of a classification
-from which the most important natural relations are professedly and
-purposely rejected.[38]
-
-(134.) The classifications by which science is advanced, however, are
-widely different from those which serve as bases for artificial systems
-of nomenclature. They cross and intersect one another, as it were, in
-every possible way, and have for their very aim to interweave all the
-objects of nature in a close and compact web of mutual relations and
-dependence. As soon, then, as any resemblance or analogy, any point of
-agreement whatever, is perceived between any two or more things,--be
-they what they will, whether objects, or phenomena, or laws,--they
-immediately and _ipso facto_ constitute themselves into a group or
-class, which may become enlarged to any extent by the accession of
-such new objects, phenomena, or laws, agreeing in the same point, as
-may come to be subsequently ascertained. It is thus that the materials
-of the world become grouped in natural families, such as chemistry
-furnishes examples of, in its various groups of acids, alkalies,
-sulphurets, &c.; or botany, in its euphorbiaceæ, umbelliferæ, &c. It is
-thus, too, that phenomena assume their places under general points of
-resemblance; as, in optics, those which refer themselves to the class
-of periodic colours, double refraction, &c.; and that resemblances
-themselves become traced, which it is the business of induction to
-generalize and include in abstract propositions.
-
-(135.) But every class formed on a positive resemblance of characters,
-or on a distinct analogy, draws with it the consideration of a negative
-class, in which that resemblance either does not subsist at all, or the
-contrary takes place; and again, there are classes in which a given
-quality is possessed by the different individuals in a descending scale
-of intensity. Now, it is of consequence to distinguish between cases
-in which there is a real opposition of quality, or a mere diminution
-of intensity, in some quality susceptible of degrees, till it becomes
-imperceptible. For example, between transparency and opacity there
-would at first sight appear a direct opposition; but, on nearer
-consideration, when we consider the gradations by which transparency
-diminishes in natural substances, we shall see reason to admit that
-the latter quality, instead of being the _opposite_ of the former,
-is only its _extreme lowest degree_. Again, in the arrangement of
-natural objects under the head of weight or specific gravity, the scale
-extends through all nature, and we know of no natural body in which the
-opposite of gravity, or positive _levity_, subsists. On the other hand,
-the opposite electricities; the north and south magnetic polarities;
-the alkaline and acid qualities of chemical agents; the positive and
-negative rotations impressed by plates of rock crystal on the planes
-of polarization of the rays of light, and many other cases, exemplify
-not merely a negation, but an active opposition of quality. Both these
-modes of classification have their peculiar importance in the inductive
-process: the one, as affording an opportunity of tracing a relation
-between phenomena by the observation of a correspondence in their
-scales of intensity; the other, by that of contrast, as we shall show
-more at large in the next section.
-
-(136.) There is a very wide distinction, too, to be taken between such
-classes as turn upon a single head of resemblance among individuals
-otherwise very different, and such as bind together in natural groups,
-by a great variety of analogies, objects which yet differ in many
-remarkable particulars. For example: if we make colourless transparency
-a head of classification, the list of the class will comprise objects
-differing most widely in their nature, such as water, air, diamond,
-spirit of wine, glass, &c. On the other hand, the chemical families of
-alkalies, metals, &c. are instances of groups of the other kind; which,
-with properties in many respects different, still agree in a general
-resemblance of several others, which at once decides us in considering
-them as having a natural relation. In the former cases, our ingenuity
-is exercised to determine what can be the cause of their resemblance,
-in the latter, of their difference; the former belong to the province
-of inductive generalization, and afford the most instructive cases for
-the investigation of causes; the latter appertain to the more secret
-recesses of nature; the very existence of such families being in itself
-one of the great and complicated phenomena of the universe, which we
-cannot hope to unriddle without an intimate and extensive acquaintance
-with the highest laws.[39]
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. VI.
-
- OF THE FIRST STAGE OF INDUCTION.--THE DISCOVERY OF PROXIMATE
- CAUSES, AND LAWS OF THE LOWEST DEGREE OF GENERALITY, AND THEIR
- VERIFICATION.
-
-
-(137.) The first thing that a philosophic mind considers, when any
-new phenomenon presents itself, is its _explanation_, or reference
-to an immediate producing cause. If that cannot be ascertained, the
-next is to _generalize_ the phenomenon, and include it, with others
-analogous to it, in the expression of some law, in the hope that its
-consideration, in a more advanced state of knowledge, may lead to the
-discovery of an adequate proximate cause.
-
-(138.) Experience having shown us the manner in which one phenomenon
-depends on another in a great variety of cases, we find ourselves
-provided, as science extends, with a continually increasing stock
-of such antecedent phenomena, or causes (meaning at present merely
-proximate causes), competent, under different modifications, to the
-production of a great multitude of effects, besides those which
-originally led to a knowledge of them. To such causes Newton has
-applied the term _veræ causæ_; that is, causes recognized as having a
-real existence in nature, and not being mere hypotheses or figments
-of the mind. To exemplify the distinction:--The phenomenon of shells
-found in rocks, at a great height above the sea, has been attributed
-to several causes. By some it has been ascribed to a plastic virtue in
-the soil; by some, to fermentation; by some, to the influence of the
-celestial bodies; by some, to the casual passage of pilgrims with their
-scallops; by some, to birds feeding on shell-fish; and by all modern
-geologists, with one consent, to the life and death of real mollusca
-at the bottom of the sea, and a subsequent alteration of the relative
-level of the land and sea. Of these, the plastic virtue and celestial
-influence belong to the class of figments of fancy. Casual transport
-by pilgrims is a real cause, and might account for a few shells here
-and there dropped on frequented passes, but is not extensive enough for
-the purpose of explanation. Fermentation, generally, is a real cause,
-so far as that there _is such a thing_; but it is not a real cause
-of the production of a shell in a rock, since no such thing was ever
-witnessed as one of its effects, and rocks and stones do not ferment.
-On the other hand, for a shell-fish dying at the bottom of the sea to
-leave his shell in the mud, where it becomes silted over and imbedded,
-happens daily; and the elevation of the bottom of the sea to become dry
-land has really been witnessed so often, and on such a scale, as to
-qualify it for a _vera causa_ available in sound philosophy.
-
-(139.) To take another instance, likewise drawn from the same
-deservedly popular science:--The fact of a great change in the general
-climate of large tracts of the globe, if not of the whole earth,
-and of a diminution of general temperature, having been recognised
-by geologists, from their examination of the remains of animals and
-vegetables of former ages enclosed in the strata, various causes for
-such diminution of temperature have been assigned. Some consider
-the whole globe as having gradually cooled from absolute fusion;
-some regard the immensely superior activity of former volcanoes, and
-consequent more copious communication of internal heat to the surface,
-in former ages, as the cause. Neither of these can be regarded as
-real causes in the sense here intended; for we do not _know_ that the
-globe has so cooled from fusion, nor are we sure that such supposed
-greater activity of former than of present volcanoes really did exist.
-A cause, possessing the essential requisites of a _vera causa_, has,
-however, been brought forward[40] in the varying influence of the
-distribution of land and sea over the surface of the globe: a change
-of such distribution, in the lapse of ages, by the degradation of the
-old continents, and the elevation of new, being a demonstrated fact;
-and the influence of such a change on the climates of particular
-regions, if not of the whole globe, being a perfectly fair conclusion,
-from what we know of continental, insular, and oceanic climates by
-actual observation. Here, then, we have, at least, a cause on which a
-philosopher may consent to reason; though, whether the changes actually
-going on are such as to warrant the whole extent of the conclusion,
-or are even taking place in the right direction, may be considered as
-undecided till the matter has been more thoroughly examined.
-
-(140.) To this we may add another, which has likewise the essential
-characters of a _vera causa_, in the astronomical _fact_ of the actual
-slow diminution of the eccentricity of the earth’s orbit round the
-sun; and which, as a general one, affecting the _mean temperature of
-the whole globe_, and as one of which the effect is both inevitable,
-and susceptible, to a certain degree, of exact estimation, deserves
-consideration. It is evident that the _mean_ temperature of the
-whole surface of the globe, in so far as it is maintained by the
-action of the sun at a higher degree than it would have were the sun
-extinguished, must depend on the mean quantity of the sun’s rays which
-it receives, or, which comes to the same thing, on the _total_ quantity
-received in a given invariable time: and the length of the year
-being unchangeable in all the fluctuations of the planetary system,
-it follows, that the total _annual_ amount of solar radiation will
-determine, _cæteris paribus_, the general climate of the earth. Now,
-it is not difficult to show that this amount is inversely proportional
-to the minor axis of the ellipse described by the earth about the
-sun, regarded as slowly variable; and that, therefore, the major axis
-remaining, as we know it to be, constant, and the orbit being actually
-in a state of approach to a circle, and, consequently, the minor axis
-being on the _increase_, the mean annual amount of solar radiation
-received by the whole earth must be actually on the _decrease_. We have
-here, therefore, an evident real cause, of sufficient universality, and
-acting _in the right direction_, to account for the phenomenon. Its
-adequacy is another consideration.[41]
-
-(141.) Whenever, therefore, any phenomenon presents itself for
-explanation, we naturally seek, in the first instance, to refer it to
-some one or other of those real causes which experience has shown to
-exist, and to be efficacious in producing similar phenomena. In this
-attempt our probability of success will, of course, mainly depend,
-1st, On the number and variety of causes experience has placed at our
-disposal; 2dly, On our habit of applying them to the explanation of
-natural phenomena; and, 3dly, On the number of analogous phenomena
-we can collect, which have either been explained, or which admit of
-explanation by some one or other of those causes, and the closeness of
-their analogy with that in question.
-
-(142.) Here, then, we see the great importance of possessing a stock
-of analogous instances or phenomena which class themselves with that
-under consideration, the explanation of one among which may naturally
-be expected to lead to that of all the rest. If the analogy of two
-phenomena be very close and striking, while, at the same time, the
-cause of one is very obvious, it becomes scarcely possible to refuse
-to admit the action of an analogous cause in the other, though not so
-obvious in itself. For instance, when we see a stone whirled round in a
-sling, describing a circular orbit round the hand, keeping the string
-stretched, and flying away the moment it breaks, we never hesitate
-to regard it as retained in its orbit by the tension of the string,
-that is, by _a force_ directed to the centre; for we feel that we do
-really exert such a force. We have here _the direct perception_ of the
-cause. When, therefore, we see a great body like the moon circulating
-round the earth and not flying off, we cannot help believing it to
-be prevented from so doing, not indeed by a material tie, but by
-that which operates in the other case through the intermedium of the
-string,--a _force_ directed constantly to the centre. It is thus that
-we are continually acquiring a knowledge of the existence of causes
-acting under circumstances of such concealment as effectually to
-prevent their direct discovery.
-
-(143.) In general we must observe that motion, wherever produced or
-changed, invariably points out the existence of _force_ as its cause;
-and thus the forces of nature become known and measured by the
-motions they produce. Thus, the _force_ of magnetism becomes known by
-the deviation produced by iron in a compass needle, or by a needle
-leaping up to a magnet held over it, as certainly as by that adhesion
-to it, when in contact and at rest, which requires force to break the
-connection; and thus the currents produced in the surface of a quantity
-of quicksilver, electrified under a conducting fluid, have pointed out
-the existence and direction of forces of enormous intensity developed
-by the electric circuit, of which we should not otherwise have had the
-least suspicion.[42]
-
-(144.) But when the cause of a phenomenon neither presents itself
-obviously on the consideration of the phenomenon itself, nor is as it
-were forced on our attention by a case of strong analogy, such as above
-described, we have then no resource but in a deliberate assemblage of
-all the parallel instances we can muster; that is, to the formation
-of a class of facts, having the phenomenon in question for a head of
-classification; and to a search among the individuals of this class
-for some other common points of agreement, among which the cause will
-of necessity be found. But if more than one cause should appear, we
-must then endeavour to find, or, if we cannot find, to _produce, new
-facts_, in which each of these in succession shall be wanting, while
-yet they agree in the general point in question. Here we find the use
-of what Bacon terms “_crucial instances_,” which are phenomena brought
-forward to decide between two causes, each having the same analogies in
-its favour. And here, too, we perceive the utility of _experiment_ as
-distinguished from mere passive observation. We make an experiment of
-the crucial kind when we form combinations, and put in action causes
-from which some particular one shall be deliberately excluded, and
-some other purposely admitted; and by the agreement or disagreement of
-the resulting phenomena with those of the class under examination, we
-decide our judgment.
-
-(145.) When we would lay down general rules for guiding and
-facilitating our search, among a great mass of assembled facts, for
-their common cause, we must have regard to the characters of that
-relation which we intend by cause and effect. Now, these are,--
-
- 1st, Invariable connection, and, in particular, invariable
- antecedence of the cause and consequence of the effect, unless
- prevented by some counteracting cause. But it must be observed,
- that, in a great number of natural phenomena, the effect is
- produced gradually, while the cause often goes on increasing in
- intensity; so that the antecedence of the one and consequence
- of the other becomes difficult to trace, though it really
- exists. On the other hand, the effect often follows the cause
- so instantaneously, that the interval cannot be perceived. In
- consequence of this, it is sometimes difficult to decide, of two
- phenomena constantly accompanying one another, which is cause or
- which effect.
-
- 2d, Invariable negation of the effect with absence of the cause,
- unless some other cause be capable of producing the same effect.
-
- 3d, Increase or diminution of the effect, with the increased
- or diminished intensity of the cause, in cases which admit of
- increase and diminution.
-
- 4th, Proportionality of the effect to its cause in all cases of
- _direct unimpeded_ action.
-
- 5th, Reversal of the effect with that of the cause.
-
-(146.) From these characters we are led to the following observations,
-which may be considered as so many propositions readily applicable to
-particular cases, or rules of philosophizing: we conclude, 1st, That if
-in our group of facts there be one in which any assigned peculiarity,
-or attendant circumstance, is wanting or opposite, such peculiarity
-cannot be the cause we seek.
-
-(147.) 2d, That any circumstance in which all the facts without
-exception agree, _may_ be the cause in question, or, if not, at least
-a collateral effect of the same cause: if there be but one such point
-of agreement, this possibility becomes a certainty; and, on the other
-hand, if there be more than one, they may be concurrent causes.
-
-(148.) 3d, That we are not to deny the existence of a cause in favour
-of which we have a unanimous agreement of strong analogies, though
-it may not be apparent how such a cause can produce the effect, or
-even though it may be difficult to conceive its existence under the
-circumstances of the case; in such cases we should rather appeal to
-experience when possible, than decide _à priori_ against the cause, and
-try whether it cannot be made apparent.
-
-(149.) For instance: seeing the sun vividly luminous, every analogy
-leads us to conclude it intensely hot. How heat can produce light,
-we know not; and how such a heat can be maintained, we can form no
-conception. Yet we are not, therefore, entitled to deny the inference.
-
-(150.) 4th, That contrary or opposing facts are equally instructive for
-the discovery of causes with favourable ones.
-
-(151.) For instance: when air is confined with moistened iron filings
-in a close vessel over water, its bulk is diminished, by a certain
-portion of it being abstracted and combining with the iron, producing
-_rust_. And, if the remainder be examined, it is found that it will
-_not_ support flame or animal life. This contrary fact shows that the
-cause of the support of flame and animal life is to be looked for in
-that part of the air which the iron abstracts, and which rusts it.
-
-(152.) 5th, That causes will very frequently become obvious, by a
-mere arrangement of our facts in the order of intensity in which
-some peculiar quality subsists; though not of necessity, because
-counteracting or modifying causes may be at the same time in action.
-
-(153.) For example: sound consists in impulses communicated to our ears
-by the air. If a series of impulses of equal force be communicated
-to it at equal intervals of time, at first in slow succession, and
-by degrees more and more rapidly, we hear at first a rattling noise,
-then a low murmur, and then a hum, which by degrees acquires the
-character of a musical note, rising higher and higher in acuteness,
-till its pitch becomes too high for the ear to follow. And from
-this correspondence between the pitch of the note and the rapidity
-of succession of the impulse, we conclude that our sensation of
-the different pitches of musical notes originates in the different
-rapidities with which their impulses are communicated to our ears.
-
-(154.) 6th, That such counteracting or modifying causes may subsist
-unperceived, and annul the effects of the cause we seek, in instances
-which, but for their action, would have come into our class of
-favourable facts; and that, therefore, exceptions may often be made
-to disappear by removing or allowing for such counteracting causes.
-This remark becomes of the greatest importance, when (as is often the
-case) a single striking exception stands out, as it were, against an
-otherwise unanimous array of facts in favour of a certain cause.
-
-(155.) Thus, in chemistry, the _alkaline_ quality of the alkaline
-and earthy bases is found to be due to the presence of oxygen
-combined with one or other of a peculiar set of metals. Ammonia is,
-however, a violent outstanding exception, such as here alluded to,
-being a compound of azote and hydrogen: but there are almost certain
-indications that this exception is not a real one, but assumes that
-appearance in consequence of some modifying cause not understood.
-
-(156.) 7th, If we can either find produced by nature, or produce
-designedly for ourselves, two instances which agree _exactly_ in all
-but one particular, and differ in that one, its influence in producing
-the phenomenon, if it have any, _must_ thereby be rendered sensible.
-If that particular be present in one instance and wanting altogether
-in the other, the production or non-production of the phenomenon will
-decide whether it be or be not the only cause: still more evidently,
-if it be present _contrariwise_ in the two cases, and the effect be
-thereby reversed. But if its total presence or absence only produces
-a change in the _degree_ or intensity of the phenomenon, we can then
-only conclude that it acts as a concurrent cause or condition with
-some other to be sought elsewhere. In nature, it is comparatively
-rare to find instances pointedly differing in one circumstance and
-agreeing in every other; but when we call experiment to our aid, it
-is easy to produce them; and this is, in fact, the grand application
-of _experiments of enquiry_ in physical researches. They become more
-valuable, and their results clearer, in proportion as they possess this
-quality (of agreeing exactly in all their circumstances but one), since
-the question put to nature becomes thereby more pointed, and its answer
-more decisive.
-
-(157.) 8th, If we cannot obtain a complete negative or opposition of
-the circumstance whose influence we would ascertain, we must endeavour
-to find cases where it varies considerably in degree. If _this_ cannot
-be done, we may perhaps be able to weaken or exalt its influence by
-the introduction of some fresh circumstance, which, abstractedly
-considered, seems _likely_ to produce this effect, and thus obtain
-indirect evidence of its influence. But then we are always to remember,
-that the evidence so obtained _is_ indirect, and that the new
-circumstance introduced _may_ have a direct influence of its own, or
-may exercise a modifying one on some _other_ circumstance.
-
-(158.) 9th, Complicated phenomena, in which several causes concurring,
-opposing, or quite independent of each other, operate at once, so as to
-produce a compound effect, may be simplified by subducting the effect
-of all the known causes, as well as the nature of the case permits,
-either by deductive reasoning or by appeal to experience, and thus
-leaving, as it were, a _residual phenomenon_ to be explained. It is by
-this process, in fact, that science, in its present advanced state, is
-chiefly promoted. Most of the phenomena which nature presents are very
-complicated; and when the effects of all known causes are estimated
-with exactness, and subducted, the residual facts are constantly
-appearing in the form of phenomena altogether new, and leading to the
-most important conclusions.
-
-(159.) For example: the return of the comet predicted by professor
-Encke, a great many times in succession, and the general good agreement
-of its calculated with its observed place during any one of its periods
-of visibility, would lead us to say that its gravitation towards the
-sun and planets is the sole and sufficient cause of all the phenomena
-of its orbitual motion; but when the effect of this cause is strictly
-calculated and subducted from the observed motion, there is found to
-remain behind a _residual phenomenon_, which would never have been
-otherwise ascertained to exist, which is a small anticipation of the
-time of its reappearances or a diminution of its periodic time, which
-cannot be accounted for by gravity, and whose cause is therefore to be
-enquired into. Such an anticipation would be caused by the resistance
-of a medium disseminated through the celestial regions; and as there
-are other good reasons for believing this to be a _vera causa_, it has
-therefore been ascribed to such a resistance.
-
-(160.) This 9th observation is of such importance in science, that
-we shall exemplify it by another instance or two. M. Arago, having
-suspended a magnetic needle by a silk thread, and set it in vibration,
-observed, that it came much sooner to a state of rest when suspended
-over a plate of copper, than when no such plate was beneath it. Now, in
-both cases there were two _veræ causæ_ why it _should_ come at length
-to rest, viz. the resistance of the air, which opposes, and at length
-destroys, all motions performed in it; and the want of perfect mobility
-in the silk thread. But the effect of these causes being exactly known
-by the observation made in the absence of the copper, and being thus
-allowed for and subducted, a _residual_ phenomenon appeared, in the
-fact that a retarding influence was exerted by the copper itself;
-and this fact, once ascertained, speedily led to the knowledge of
-an entirely new and unexpected class of relations. To add one more
-instance. If it be true (as M. Fourrier considers it demonstrated to
-be) that the celestial regions have a temperature independent of the
-sun, not greatly inferior to that at which quicksilver congeals, and
-much superior to some degrees of cold which have been artificially
-produced, two causes suggest themselves: one is that assigned by the
-author above mentioned; the radiation of the stars; another may be
-proposed in the ether or elastic medium mentioned in the last section,
-which the phenomena of light and the resistance of comets give us
-reason to believe fills all space, and which, in analogy to all the
-elastic media known, may be supposed to possess a temperature and a
-specific heat of its own, which it is capable of communicating to
-bodies surrounded by it. Now, if we consider that the heat radiated
-by the sun follows the same proportion as its light, and regard it as
-reasonable to admit with respect to stellar heat what holds good of
-solar; the effect of stellar radiation in maintaining a temperature in
-space should be as much inferior to that of the radiation of the sun
-as the light of a moonless midnight is to that of an equatorial noon;
-that is to say, almost inconceivably smaller. Allowing, then, the full
-effect for this cause, there would still remain a great residuum due to
-the presence of the ether.
-
-(161.) Many of the new elements of chemistry have been detected in
-the investigation of _residual phenomena_. Thus, Arfwedson discovered
-lithia by perceiving an _excess of weight_ in the sulphate produced
-from a small portion of what he considered as magnesia present in a
-mineral he had analysed. It is on this principle, too, that the _small
-concentrated residues of great operations_ in the arts are almost
-sure to be the lurking places of new chemical ingredients: witness
-iodine, brome, selenium, and the new metals accompanying platina in the
-experiments of Wollaston and Tennant. It was a happy thought of Glauber
-to examine what every body else threw away.
-
-(162.) Finally, we have to observe, that the detection of a _possible_
-cause, by the comparison of assembled cases, _must_ lead to one of
-two things: either, 1st, The detection of a real cause, and of its
-manner of acting, so as to furnish a complete explanation of the facts;
-or, 2dly, The establishment of an abstract law of nature, pointing
-out two phenomena of a general kind as invariably connected; and
-asserting, that where one is, there the other will always be found.
-Such invariable connection is itself a phenomenon of a higher order
-than any particular fact; and when many such are discovered, we may
-again proceed to classify, combine, and examine them, with a view to
-the detection of _their_ causes, or the discovery of still more general
-laws, and so on without end.
-
-(163.) Let us now exemplify this inductive search for a cause by one
-general example: suppose _dew_ were the phenomenon proposed, whose
-cause we would know. In the first place, we must separate dew from rain
-and the moisture of fogs, and limit the application of the term to
-what is really meant, which is, the spontaneous appearance of moisture
-on substances exposed in the open air when no rain or _visible_ wet
-is falling. Now, here we have analogous phenomena in the moisture
-which bedews a cold metal or stone when we breathe upon it; that which
-appears on a glass of water fresh from the well in hot weather; that
-which appears on the _inside_ of windows when sudden rain or hail
-chills the external air; that which runs down our walls when, after
-a long frost, a warm moist thaw comes on: all these instances agree
-in one point (Rule 2. § 147.), the coldness of the object dewed, in
-comparison with the air in contact with it.
-
-(164.) But, in the case of the night dew, is this a _real cause_--is it
-a fact that the object dewed _is_ colder than the air? Certainly not,
-one would at first be inclined to say; for what is to _make_ it so? But
-the analogies are cogent and unanimous; and, therefore, (pursuant to
-Rule 3. § 148.) we are not to discard their indications; and, besides,
-the experiment is easy: we have only to lay a thermometer in contact
-with the dewed substance, and hang one at a little distance above it
-out of reach of its influence. The experiment has been therefore made;
-the question has been asked, and the answer has been invariably in the
-_affirmative_. Whenever an object contracts dew, _it is_ colder than
-the air. Here, then, we have _an invariable concomitant_ circumstance:
-but is this chill an effect of dew, or its cause? That dews are
-accompanied with a chill is a common remark; but vulgar prejudice would
-make the cold the _effect_ rather than the cause. We must, therefore,
-collect more facts, or, which comes to the same thing, vary the
-circumstances; since every instance in which the circumstances differ
-is a fresh fact; and, especially, we must note the contrary or negative
-cases (Rule 4. § 150.), _i. e._ where no dew is produced.
-
-(165.) Now, 1st, no dew is produced on the surface of _polished
-metals_, but it is very copiously on glass, both exposed with their
-faces upwards, and in some cases the under side of a horizontal plate
-of glass is also dewed; which last circumstance (by Rule 1. § 146.)
-excludes the _fall_ of moisture from the sky in an invisible form,
-which would naturally suggest itself as a cause. In the cases of
-polished metal and polished glass, the contrast shows evidently that
-the _substance_ has much to do with the phenomenon; therefore, let
-the substance _alone_ be diversified as much as possible, by exposing
-polished surfaces of various kinds. This done, _a scale of intensity_
-becomes obvious (Rule 5. § 152.). Those polished substances are found
-to be most strongly dewed which conduct heat worst; while those which
-conduct well resist dew most effectually. Here we encounter a _law_
-of the first degree of generality. But, if we expose rough surfaces,
-instead of polished, we sometimes find this law interfered with
-(Rule 5. § 152.). Thus, roughened iron, especially if painted over
-or blackened, becomes dewed sooner than varnished paper: the kind of
-_surface_ therefore has a great influence. Expose, then, the _same_
-material in very diversified states as to surface (Rule 7. § 156.), and
-another scale of intensity becomes at once apparent; those _surfaces_
-which _part with their heat_ most readily by radiation are found to
-contract dew most copiously: and thus we have detected another law of
-the same generality with the former, by a comparison of two classes of
-facts, one relating to dew, the other to the radiation of heat from
-surfaces. Again, the influence ascertained to exist of _substance_ and
-_surface_ leads us to consider that of _texture_: and here, again, we
-are presented on trial with remarkable differences, and with a third
-_scale of intensity_, pointing out substances of a close firm texture,
-such as stones, metals, &c. as unfavourable, but those of a loose one,
-as cloth, wool, velvet, eiderdown, cotton, &c. as eminently favourable,
-to the contraction of dew: and these are precisely those which are best
-adapted for clothing, or for impeding the free passage of heat from
-the skin into the air, so as to allow their outer surfaces to be very
-cold while they remain warm within.
-
-(166.) Lastly, among the negative instances, (§ 150.) it is observed,
-that dew is never copiously deposited in situations much screened
-from the open sky, and not at all in _a cloudy night_; but if the
-clouds withdraw, even for a few minutes, and leave a clear opening,
-a deposition of dew presently begins, and goes on increasing. Here,
-then, a cause is distinctly pointed out by its antecedence to the
-effect in question (§ 145.). A clear view of the cloudless sky, then,
-is an essential condition, or, which comes to the same thing, clouds or
-surrounding objects act as _opposing causes_. This is so much the case,
-that dew formed in clear intervals will often even evaporate again when
-the sky becomes thickly overcast (Rule 4. § 150.).
-
-(167.) When we now come to assemble these partial inductions so as to
-raise from them a general conclusion, we consider, 1st, That all the
-conclusions we have come to have a reference to that first general
-fact--the cooling of the exposed surface of the body dewed below
-the temperature of the air. Those surfaces which part with their
-heat outwards most readily, and have it supplied from within most
-slowly, will, of course, become coldest if there be an opportunity
-for their heat to escape, and not be restored to them from without.
-Now, a clear sky affords such an opportunity. It is a law well known
-to those who are conversant with the nature of heat, that heat is
-constantly escaping from _all bodies_ in rays, or by _radiation_, but
-is as constantly restored to them by the similar radiation of others
-surrounding them. Clouds and surrounding objects therefore act as
-opposing causes by replacing the whole or a great part of the heat so
-radiated away, which can escape effectually, without being replaced,
-only through openings into infinite space. Thus, at length, we arrive
-at the general proximate cause of dew, in the cooling of the dewed
-surface by radiation faster than its heat can be restored to it, by
-communication with the ground, or by counter-radiation; so as to
-become colder than the air, and thereby to cause a condensation of its
-moisture.
-
-(168.) We have purposely selected this theory of dew, first developed
-by the late Dr. Wells, as one of the most beautiful specimens we can
-call to mind of inductive experimental enquiry lying within a moderate
-compass. It is not possible in so brief a space to do it justice; but
-we earnestly recommend his work[43] (a short and very entertaining one)
-for perusal to the student of natural philosophy, as a model with which
-he will do well to become familiar.
-
-(169.) In the analysis above given, the formation of dew is referred to
-two more general phenomena; the radiation of heat, and the condensation
-of invisible vapour by cold. The cause of the former is a much higher
-enquiry, and may be said, indeed, to be totally unknown; that of the
-latter actually forms a most important branch of physical enquiry. In
-such a case, when we reason upwards till we reach an ultimate fact, we
-regard a phenomenon as fully explained; as we consider the branch of
-a tree to terminate when traced to its insertion in the trunk, or a
-twig to its junction with the branch; or rather, as a rivulet retains
-its importance and its name till lost in some larger tributary, or in
-the main river which delivers it into the ocean. This, however, always
-supposes that, on a reconsideration of the case, we see clearly how the
-admission of such a fact, with all its attendant laws, will perfectly
-account for _every particular_--as well those which, in the different
-stages of the induction, have led us to a knowledge of it, as those
-which we had neglected, or considered less minutely than the rest.
-But, had we no previous knowledge of the radiation of heat, this same
-induction would have made it known to us, and, duly considered, might
-have led to the knowledge of many of its laws.
-
-(170.) In the study of nature, we must not, therefore, be scrupulous
-as to _how_ we reach to a knowledge of such general facts: provided
-only we verify them carefully when once detected, we must be content
-to seize them wherever they are to be found. And this brings us to
-consider the _verification_ of inductions.
-
-(171.) If, in our induction, every individual case has actually been
-present to our minds, we are sure that it will find itself duly
-_represented_ in our final conclusion: but this is impossible for
-such cases as were _unknown_ to us, and hardly ever happens even
-with all the known cases; for such is the tendency of the human mind
-to speculation, that on the least idea of an analogy between a few
-phenomena, it leaps forward, as it were, to a cause or law, to the
-temporary neglect of all the rest; so that, in fact, almost all our
-principal inductions must be regarded as a series of ascents and
-descents, and of conclusions from a few cases, verified by trial on
-many.
-
-(172.) Whenever, therefore, we think we have been led by induction to
-the knowledge of the proximate cause of a phenomenon or of a law of
-nature, our next business is to examine deliberately and _seriatim_
-all the cases we have collected of its occurrence, in order to satisfy
-ourselves that they are explicable by our cause, or fairly included in
-the expression of our law: and in case any exception occurs, it must
-be carefully noted and set aside for re-examination at a more advanced
-period, when, possibly, the cause of exception may appear, and the
-exception itself, by allowing for the effect of that cause, be brought
-over to the side of our induction; but should exceptions prove numerous
-and various in their features, our faith in the conclusion will be
-proportionally shaken, and at all events its importance lessened by the
-destruction of its universality.
-
-(173.) In the conduct of this verification, we are to consider whether
-the cause or law to which we are conducted be one already known and
-recognised as a more general one, whose nature is well understood, and
-of which the phenomenon in question is but one more case in addition
-to those already known, or whether it be one less general, less known,
-or altogether new. In the latter case, our verification will suffice,
-if it merely shows that all the cases considered are plainly cases in
-point. But in the former, the process of verification is of a much
-more severe and definite kind. We must trace the action of our cause
-with distinctness and precision, as modified by all the circumstances
-of each case; we must estimate its effects, and show that nothing
-unexplained remains behind; at least, in so far as the presence of
-unknown modifying causes is not concerned.
-
-(174.) Now, this is precisely the sort of process in which _residual
-phenomena_ (such as spoken of in art. 158.) may be expected to occur.
-If our induction be really a valid and a comprehensive one, _whatever_
-remains unexplained in the comparison of its conclusion with particular
-cases, under all their circumstances, _is_ such a phenomenon, and comes
-in its turn to be a subject of inductive reasoning to discover its
-cause or laws. It is thus that we may be said to witness facts with
-the eyes of reason; and it is thus that we are continually attaining a
-knowledge of new phenomena and new laws which lie beneath the surface
-of things, and give rise to the creation of fresh branches of science
-more and more remote from common observation.
-
-(175.) Physical astronomy affords numerous and splendid instances of
-this. The law, for example, which asserts that the planets are retained
-in their orbits about the sun, and satellites about their primaries,
-by an attractive force, decreasing as the square of the distances
-increases, comes to be verified in each particular case by deducing
-from it the exact motions which, under the circumstances, ought to take
-place, and comparing them with fact. This comparison, while it verifies
-in general the existence of the law of gravitation as supposed, and
-its adequacy to explain all the principal motions of every body in the
-system, yet leaves some small deviations in those of the planets, and
-some very considerable ones in that of the moon and other satellites,
-still unaccounted for; residual phenomena, which still remain to be
-traced up to causes. By further examining these, their causes have at
-length been ascertained, and found to consist in the mutual actions of
-the planets on each other, and the disturbing influence of the sun on
-the motions of the satellites.
-
-(176.) But a law of nature has not that degree of generality which
-fits it for a stepping-stone to greater inductions, unless it be
-_universal_ in its application. We cannot rely on its enabling us to
-extend our views beyond the circle of instances from which it was
-obtained, unless we have already had experience of its power to do so;
-unless it actually _has_ enabled us before trial to say what will take
-place in cases analogous to those originally contemplated; unless, in
-short, we have studiously placed ourselves in the situation of its
-antagonists, and even perversely endeavoured to find exceptions to
-it without success. It is in the precise proportion that a law once
-obtained endures this extreme severity of trial, that its value and
-importance are to be estimated; and our next step in the verification
-of an induction must therefore consist in _extending_ its application
-to cases not originally contemplated; in studiously varying the
-circumstances under which our causes act, with a view to ascertain
-whether their effect is general; and in pushing the application of our
-laws to extreme cases.
-
-(177.) For example, a fair induction from a great number of facts led
-Galileo to conclude that the accelerating power of gravity is the same
-on all sorts of bodies, and on great and small masses indifferently;
-and this he exemplified by letting bodies of very different natures
-and weights fall at the same instant from a high tower, when it was
-observed that they struck the ground at the same moment, abating a
-certain trifling difference, due, as he justly believed it to be, to
-the greater proportional resistance of the air to light than to heavy
-bodies. The experiment could not, at that time, be fairly tried with
-extremely light substances, such as cork, feathers, cotton, &c. because
-of the great resistance experienced by these in their fall; no means
-being then known of removing this cause of disturbance. It was not,
-therefore, till after the invention of the air-pump that this law could
-be put to the severe test of an extreme case. A guinea and a downy
-feather were let drop at once from the upper part of a tall exhausted
-glass, and struck the bottom at the same moment. Let any one make the
-trial _in the air_, and he will perceive the force of an _extreme case_.
-
-(178.) In the verification of a law whose expression is _quantitative_,
-not only must its generality be established by the trial of it in as
-various circumstances as possible, but every such trial must be one of
-precise measurement. And in such cases the means taken for subjecting
-it to trial ought to be so devised as to repeat and multiply a great
-number of times any deviation (if any exist); so that, let it be ever
-so small, it shall at last become sensible.
-
-(179.) For instance, let the law to be verified be, that _the gravity
-of every material body is in the direct proportion of its mass_, which
-is only another mode of expressing Galileo’s law above mentioned.
-The time of falling from any moderate height cannot be measured with
-precision enough for our purpose: but if it can be repeated a very
-great multitude of times _without any loss or gain_ in the intervals,
-and the whole amount of the times of fall so repeated measured by
-a clock; and if at the same time the resistance of the air can be
-rendered _exactly alike_ for all the bodies tried, we have here
-Galileo’s trial in a much more refined state; and it is evident that
-almost unlimited exactness may be obtained. Now, all this Newton
-accomplished by the simple and elegant contrivance of enclosing in a
-hollow pendulum the same weights of a great number of substances the
-most different that could be found in all respects, as gold, glass,
-wood, water, wheat, &c.[44], and ascertaining the time required for
-the pendulum so charged to make a great number of oscillations; in
-each of which it is clear the weights had to fall, and be raised again
-successively, without loss of time, through the same _identical_
-spaces. Thus any difference, however inconsiderable, that might
-exist in the time of one such fall and rise would be multiplied and
-accumulated till they became sensible. And none having been discovered
-by so delicate a process in any case, the law was considered verified
-both in respect of generality and exactness. This, however, is nothing
-to the verifications afforded by astronomical phenomena, where the
-deviations, if any, accumulate for thousands of years instead of a few
-hours.
-
-(180.) The surest and best characteristic of a well-founded and
-extensive induction, however, is when verifications of it spring up,
-as it were, spontaneously, into notice, from quarters where they might
-be least expected, or even among instances of that very kind which
-were at first considered hostile to them. Evidence of this kind is
-irresistible, and compels assent with a weight which scarcely any other
-possesses. To give an example: M. Mitscherlich had announced a law to
-this effect--_that_ the chemical elements of which all bodies consist
-are susceptible of being classified in distinct groups, which he termed
-_isomorphous_ groups; and _that_ these groups are so related, that
-when similar combinations are formed of individuals belonging to two,
-three, or more of them, such combinations will crystallize in the same
-geometrical forms. To this curious and important law there appeared
-a remarkable exception. According to professor Mitscherlich, the
-arsenic and phosphoric acids _are_ similar combinations coming under
-the meaning of his law, and their combinations with soda and water,
-forming the salts known to chemists under the names of arseniate and
-phosphate of soda, ought, if the law were general, to crystallize in
-identical shapes. The fact, however, was understood to be otherwise.
-But lately, Mr. Clarke, a British chemist, having examined the two
-salts attentively, ascertained the fact that their compositions
-deviate essentially from that similarity which M. Mitscherlich’s law
-requires; and that, therefore, the exception in question disappears.
-This was something: but, pursuing the subject further, the same
-ingenious enquirer happily succeeded in producing a _new_ phosphate of
-soda, differing from that generally known in containing a different
-proportion of water, and agreeing in composition exactly with the
-arseniate. The crystals of this new salt, when examined, were found by
-him to be precisely identical in form with those of the arseniate: thus
-verifying, in a most striking and totally unexpected manner, the law in
-question, or, as it is called, the law of isomorphism.
-
-(181.) Unexpected and peculiarly striking confirmations of inductive
-laws frequently occur in the form of residual phenomena, in the course
-of investigations of a widely different nature from those which gave
-rise to the inductions themselves. A very elegant example may be cited
-in the unexpected confirmation of the law of the developement of heat
-in elastic fluids by compression, which is afforded by the phenomena
-of sound. The enquiry into the cause of sound had led to conclusions
-respecting its mode of propagation, from which its velocity in the air
-could be precisely calculated. The calculations were performed; but,
-when compared with fact, though the agreement was quite sufficient
-to show the general correctness of the cause and mode of propagation
-assigned, _yet_ the _whole_ velocity could not be shown to arise from
-this theory. There was still a _residual_ velocity to be accounted
-for, which placed dynamical philosophers for a long time in a great
-dilemma. At length Laplace struck on the happy idea, that this might
-arise from the _heat_ developed in the act of that condensation which
-necessarily takes place at every vibration by which sound is conveyed.
-The matter was subjected to exact calculation, and the result was
-at once the complete explanation of the residual phenomenon, and a
-striking confirmation of the general law of the developement of heat by
-compression, under circumstances beyond artificial imitation.
-
-(182.) In extending our inductions to cases not originally
-contemplated, there is one step which always strikes the mind with
-peculiar force, and with such a sensation of novelty and surprise,
-as often gives it a weight beyond its due philosophic value. It is
-the transition from the little to the great, and _vice versâ_, but
-especially the former. It is so beautiful to see, for instance, an
-experiment performed in a watch-glass, or before a blowpipe, succeed,
-in a great manufactory, on many tons of matter, or, in the bosom of
-a volcano, upon millions of cubic fathoms of lava, that we almost
-forget that these great masses are made up of watch-glassfuls, and
-blowpipe-beads. We see the enormous intervals between the stars and
-planets of the heavens, which afford room for innumerable processes
-to be carried on, for light and heat to circulate, and for curious
-and complicated motions to go forward among them: we look more
-attentively, and we see sidereal systems, probably not less vast and
-complicated than our own, crowded apparently into a small space (from
-the effect of their distance from us), and forming groups resembling
-bodies of a substantial appearance, having form and outline: yet we
-recoil with incredulous surprise when we are asked _why_ we cannot
-conceive the atoms of a grain of sand to be as remote from each other
-(proportionally to their sizes) as the stars of the firmament; and
-why there may not be going on, in that little microcosm, processes
-as complicated and wonderful as those of the great world around us.
-Yet the student who makes any progress in natural philosophy will
-encounter numberless cases in which this transfer of ideas from the one
-extreme of magnitude to the other will be called for: he will find,
-for instance, the phenomena of the propagation of winds referred to
-the same laws which regulate the propagation of motions through the
-smallest masses of air; those of lightning assimilated to the mere
-communication of an electric spark, and those of earthquakes to the
-tremors of a stretched wire: in short, he must lay his account to
-finding the distinction of great and little altogether annihilated in
-nature: and it is well for man that such is the case, and that the same
-laws, which he can discover and verify in his own circumscribed sphere
-of power, should prove available to him when he comes to apply them on
-the greatest scale; since it is thus only that he is enabled to become
-an exciting cause in operations of any considerable magnitude, and to
-vindicate his importance in creation.
-
-(183.) But the business of induction does not end here: its final
-result must be followed out into all its consequences, and applied to
-all those cases which seem even remotely to bear upon the subject of
-enquiry. Every new addition to our stock of causes becomes a means
-of fresh attack with new vantage ground upon all those unexplained
-parts of former phenomena which have resisted previous efforts. It
-can hardly be pressed forcibly enough on the attention of the student
-of nature, that there is scarcely any natural phenomenon which can be
-fully and completely explained in all its circumstances, without a
-union of several, perhaps of all, the sciences. The great phenomena of
-astronomy, indeed, may be considered exceptions; but this is merely
-because their scale is so vast that one only of the most widely
-extending forces of nature takes the lead, and all those agents whose
-sphere of action is limited to narrower bounds, and which determine
-the production of phenomena nearer at hand, are thrown into the back
-ground, and become merged and lost in comparative insignificance. But
-in the more intimate phenomena which surround us it is far otherwise.
-Into what a complication of different branches of science are we not
-led by the consideration of such a phenomenon as rain, for instance,
-or flame, or a thousand others, which are constantly going on before
-our eyes? Hence, it is hardly possible to arrive at the knowledge of
-a law of any degree of generality in any branch of science, but it
-immediately furnishes us with a means of extending our knowledge of
-innumerable others, the most remote from the point we set out from; so
-that, when once embarked in any physical research, it is impossible for
-any one to predict where it may ultimately lead him.
-
-(184.) This remark rather belongs to the inverse or _deductive_
-process, by which we pursue laws into their remote consequences.
-But it is very important to observe, that the successful process of
-scientific enquiry demands continually the alternate use of both
-the _inductive_ and _deductive_ method. The path by which we rise to
-knowledge must be made smooth and beaten in its lower steps, and often
-ascended and descended, before we can scale our way to any eminence,
-much less climb to the summit. The achievement is too great for a
-single effort; stations must be established, and communications kept
-open with all below. To quit metaphor; there is nothing so instructive,
-or so likely to lead to the acquisition of general views, as this
-pursuit of the consequences of a law once arrived at into every subject
-where it may seem likely to have an influence. The discovery of a
-new law of nature, a new ultimate fact, or one that even temporarily
-puts on that appearance, is like the discovery of a new element in
-chemistry. Thus, selenium was hardly discovered by Berzelius in the
-vitriol works of Fahlun, when it presently made its appearance in the
-sublimates of Stromboli, and the rare and curious products of the
-Hungarian mines. And thus it is with every new law, or general fact. It
-is hardly announced before its traces are found every where, and every
-one is astonished at its having so long remained concealed. And hence
-it happens that unexpected lights are shed at length over parts of
-science that had been abandoned in despair, and given over to hopeless
-obscurity.
-
-(185.) The verification of _quantitative_ laws has been already spoken
-of (178.); but their importance in physical science is so very great,
-inasmuch as they alone afford a handle to strict mathematical deductive
-application, that something ought to be said of the nature of the
-inductions by which they are to be arrived at. In their simplest or
-least general stages (of which alone we speak at present) they usually
-express some numerical relation between two quantities dependent on
-each other, either as collateral effects of a common cause, or as the
-amount of its effect under given numerical circumstances or _data_.
-For example, the law of refraction before noticed (§ 22.) expresses,
-by a very simple relation, the amount of angular deviation of a ray
-of light from its course, when the _angle_ at which it is inclined to
-the refracting surface is known, viz. that the _sine_ of the angle
-which the incident ray makes with a perpendicular to the surface is
-always to that of the angle made by the refracted ray with the same
-perpendicular, in a constant proportion, so long as the refracting
-substance is the same. To arrive inductively at laws of this kind,
-where one quantity _depends_ on or _varies with_ another, all that is
-required is a series of careful and exact measures in every different
-state of the _datum_ and _quæsitum_. Here, however, the mathematical
-form of the law being of the highest importance, the greatest attention
-must be given to the _extreme cases_ as well as to all those points
-where the one quantity changes rapidly with a small change of the
-other.[45] The results must be set down in a table in which the _datum_
-gradually increases in magnitude from the lowest to the highest limit
-of which it is susceptible. It will depend then entirely on our
-habit of treating mathematical subjects, how far we may be able to
-include such a table in the distinct statement of a mathematical law.
-The discovery of such laws is often remarkably facilitated by the
-contemplation of a class of phenomena to be noticed further on, under
-the head of Collective Instances, (see § 194.) in which the nature of
-the mathematical expression in which the law sought is comprehended, is
-pointed out by the figure of some curve brought under inspection by a
-proper mode of experimenting.
-
-(186.) After all, unless our induction embraces a series of cases which
-absolutely include the whole scale of variation of which the quantities
-in question admit, the mathematical expression so obtained cannot be
-depended upon as the true one, and if the scale actually embraced be
-small, the extension of laws so derived to extreme cases will in all
-probability be exceedingly fallacious. For example, air is an elastic
-fluid, and as such, if enclosed in a confined space and squeezed, its
-bulk diminishes: now, from a great number of trials made in cases where
-the air has been compressed into a half, a third, &c. even as far
-as a fiftieth of its bulk, or less, it has been concluded that “the
-density of air is proportional to the compressing force,” or the bulk
-it occupies _inversely_ as that force; and when the air is rarefied
-by taking off part of its natural pressure, the same is found to be
-the case, within very extensive limits. Yet it is impossible that this
-should be, strictly or mathematically speaking, the true law; for, if
-it were so, there could be no limit to the condensation of air, while
-yet we have the strongest analogies to show that long before it had
-reached any very enormous pitch the air would be reduced into a liquid,
-and even, perhaps, if pressed yet more violently, into a solid form.
-
-(187.) Laws thus derived, by the direct process of including in
-mathematical formulæ the results of a greater or less number of
-measurements, are called “empirical laws.” A good example of such a
-law is that given by Dr. Young (Phil. Trans. 1826,) for the decrement
-of life, or the law of mortality. Empirical laws in this state are
-evidently _unverified inductions_, and are to be received and reasoned
-on with the utmost reserve. No confidence can ever be placed in them
-beyond the limits of the data from which they are derived; and even
-within those limits they require a special and severe scrutiny to
-examine _how nearly_ they do represent the observed facts; that is to
-say, whether, in the comparison of their results with the observed
-quantities, the differences are such as may fairly be attributed to
-error of observation. When so carefully examined, they become, however,
-most valuable; and frequently, when afterwards verified theoretically
-by a deductive process (as will be explained in our next chapter),
-turn out to be rigorous laws of nature, and afford the noblest and
-most convincing supports of which theories themselves are susceptible.
-The finest instances of this kind are the great laws of the planetary
-motions deduced by Kepler, entirely from a comparison of observations
-with each other, with no assistance from theory. These laws, viz. that
-the planets move in ellipses round the sun; that each describes about
-the sun’s centre equal areas in equal times; and that in the orbits of
-different planets the squares of the periodical times are proportional
-to the cubes of the distances; were the results of inconceivable
-labour of calculation and comparison: but they amply repaid the
-labour bestowed on them, by affording afterwards the most conclusive
-and unanswerable proofs of the Newtonian system. On the other hand,
-when empirical laws are unduly relied on beyond the limits of the
-observations from which they were deduced, there is no more fertile
-source of fatal mistakes. The formulæ which have been empirically
-deduced for the elasticity of steam (till very recently), and those
-for the resistance of fluids, and other similar subjects, have almost
-invariably failed to support the theoretical structures which have been
-erected on them.
-
-(188.) It is a remarkable and happy fact, that the shortest and most
-direct of all inductions should be that which has led at once, or by
-very few steps, to the highest of all natural laws,--we mean those of
-motion and force. Nothing can be more simple, precise, and general,
-than the enunciation of these laws; and, as we have once before
-observed, their application to particular facts in the descending or
-deductive method is limited by nothing but the limited extent of our
-mathematics. It would seem, then, that dynamical science were taken
-thenceforward out of the pale of induction, and transformed into a
-matter of absolute _à priori_ reasoning, as much as geometry; and so
-it would be, were our mathematics perfect, and all the _data_ known.
-Unhappily, the first is so far from being the case, that in many
-of the most interesting branches of dynamical enquiry they leave
-us completely at a loss. In what relates to the motions of fluids,
-for instance, this is severely felt. We can include our problems,
-it is true, in algebraical equations, and we can demonstrate that
-they _contain_ the solutions; but the equations themselves are so
-intractable, and present such insuperable difficulties, that they often
-leave us quite as much in the dark as before. But even were these
-difficulties overcome, recourse to experience must still be had, to
-establish the _data_ on which particular applications are to depend;
-and although mathematical analysis affords very powerful means of
-_representing_ in general terms the data of any proposed case, and
-_afterwards_, by comparison of its results with fact, determining
-_what_ those data must be to explain the observed phenomena, still,
-in any mode of considering the matter, an appeal to experience in
-every particular instance of application is unavoidable, even when
-the general principles are regarded as sufficiently established
-without it. Now, in all such cases of difficulty we must recur to our
-inductive processes, and regard the branches of dynamical science where
-this takes place as purely experimental. By this we gain an immense
-advantage, viz. that in all those points of them where the abstract
-dynamical principles _do_ afford distinct conclusions, we obtain
-verifications for our inductions of the highest and finest possible
-kind. When we work our way up inductively to one of these results, we
-cannot help feeling the strongest assurance of the validity of the
-induction.
-
-(189.) The necessity of this appeal to experiment in every thing
-relating to the motions of fluids on the large scale has long been
-felt. Newton himself, who laid the first foundations of hydrodynamical
-science (so this branch of dynamics is called), distinctly perceived
-it, and set the example of laborious and exact experiments on their
-resistance to motion, and other particulars. Venturi, Bernoulli, and
-many others, have applied the method of experiment to the motions
-of fluids in pipes and canals; and recently the brothers Weber have
-published an elaborate and excellent experimental enquiry into the
-phenomena of waves. One of the greatest and most successful attempts,
-however, to bring an important, and till then very obscure, branch
-of dynamical enquiry back to the dominion of experiment, has been
-made by Chladni and Savart in the case of sound and vibratory motion
-in general; and it is greatly to be wished that the example may be
-followed in many others hardly less abstruse and impracticable when
-theoretically treated. In such cases the inductive and deductive
-methods of enquiry may be said to go hand in hand, the one verifying
-the conclusions deduced by the other; and the combination of experiment
-and theory, which may thus be brought to bear in such cases, forms
-an engine of discovery infinitely more powerful than either taken
-separately. This state of any department of science is perhaps of
-all others the most interesting, and that which promises the most to
-research.
-
-(190.) It can hardly be expected that we should terminate this division
-of our subject without some mention of the “prerogatives of instances”
-of Bacon, by which he understands characteristic phenomena, selected
-from the great miscellaneous mass of facts which occur in nature,
-and which, by their number, indistinctness, and complication, tend
-rather to confuse than to direct the mind in its search for causes
-and general heads of induction. Phenomena so selected on account of
-some peculiarly forcible way in which they strike the reason, and
-impress us with a kind of sense of causation, or a particular aptitude
-for generalization, he considers, and justly, as holding a kind of
-prerogative dignity, and claiming our first and especial attention in
-physical enquiries.
-
-(191.) We have already observed that, in forming inductions, it will
-most commonly happen that we are led to our conclusions by the especial
-force of some two or three strongly impressive facts, rather than by
-affording the whole mass of cases a regular consideration; and hence
-the need of cautious verification. Indeed, so strong is this propensity
-of the human mind, that there is hardly a more common thing than to
-find persons ready to assign a cause for every thing they see, and, in
-so doing, to join things the most incongruous, by analogies the most
-fanciful. This being the case, it is evidently of great importance
-that these first ready impulses of the mind should be made on the
-contemplation of the cases most likely to lead to good inductions.
-The misfortune, however, is, in natural philosophy, that the choice
-does not rest with us. We must take the instances as nature presents
-them. Even if we are furnished with a list of them in tabular order,
-we must understand and compare them with each other, before we can
-tell which _are_ the instances thus deservedly entitled to the highest
-consideration. And, after all, after much labour in vain, and groping
-in the dark, accident or casual observation will present a case which
-strikes us at once with a full insight into a subject, before we can
-even have time to determine to what class its _prerogative_ belongs.
-For example, the laws of crystallography were obscure, and its causes
-still more so, till Haüy fortunately dropped a beautiful crystal of
-calcareous spar on a stone pavement, and broke it. In piecing together
-the fragments, he observed their facets not to correspond with those of
-the crystal in its entire state, but to belong to another form; and,
-following out the hint offered by a “_glaring instance_” thus casually
-obtruded on his notice, he discovered the beautiful laws of the
-cleavage, and the primitive forms of minerals.
-
-(192.) It has always appeared to us, we must confess, that the help
-which the classification of instances, under their different titles of
-prerogative, affords to inductions, however just such classification
-may be in itself, is yet more apparent than real. The force of the
-instance must be felt in the mind, before it can be referred to
-its place in the system; and, before it can be either referred or
-appretiated, it must be known; and when it _is_ appretiated, we are
-ready enough to interweave it in our web of induction, without greatly
-troubling ourselves with enquiring whence it derives the weight we
-acknowledge it to have in our decisions. However, since much importance
-is usually attached to this part of Bacon’s work, we shall here give a
-few examples to illustrate the nature of some of his principal cases.
-One, of what he calls “glaring instances,” has just been mentioned.
-In these, the _nature_ or cause enquired into, (which in this case
-is the cause of the assumption of a peculiar external form, or the
-internal _structure_ of a crystal,) “stands naked and alone, and this
-in an eminent manner, or in the highest degree of its power.” No doubt,
-such instances as these are highly instructive; but the difficulty in
-physics is to find such, not to perceive their force when found.
-
-(193.) The contrary of glaring are “clandestine instances,” where
-“the nature sought is exhibited in its weakest and most imperfect
-state.” Of this, Bacon himself has given an admirable example in the
-cohesion of fluids, as a _clandestine instance_ of the “_nature_ or
-quality of consistence, or solidity.” Yet here, again, the same acute
-discrimination which enabled Bacon to perceive the analogy which
-connects fluids with solids, through the common property of cohesive
-attraction, would, at the same time, have enabled him to draw from it,
-if properly supported, every consequence necessary to forming just
-notions of the cohesive force; nor does its reference to the class of
-clandestine instances at all assist in bringing forward and maturing
-the final results. When, however, the final result is obtained,--when
-our induction is complete, and we would verify it,--this class of
-instances is of great use, being, in fact, frequently no other than
-that of _extreme cases_, such as we have already spoken of (in §
-177.); which, by placing our conclusions, as it were, in violent
-circumstances, try their temper, and bring their vigour to the test.
-
-(194.) Bacon’s “collective instances” (_instantiæ unionis_), are no
-other than general facts, or laws of some degree of generality, and
-are themselves the results of induction. But there is a species of
-collective instance which Bacon does not seem to have contemplated, of
-a peculiarly instructive character; and that is, where particular cases
-are offered to our observation in such numbers at once as to make the
-induction of their law a matter of ocular inspection. For example, the
-parabolic form assumed by a jet of water spouted from a round hole,
-is a _collective instance_ of the velocities and directions of the
-motions of all the particles which compose it _seen at once_, and which
-thus leads us, without trouble, to recognize the law of the motion of
-a projectile. Again, the beautiful figures exhibited by sand strewed
-on regular plates of glass or metal set in vibration, are _collective
-instances_ of an infinite number of points which remain at rest while
-the remainder of the plate vibrates; and in consequence afford us,
-as it were, a sight of the law which regulates their arrangement
-and sequence throughout the whole surface. The beautifully coloured
-lemniscates seen around the optic axes of crystals exposed to polarized
-light afford a superb example of the same kind, pointing at once to
-the general mathematical expression of the law which regulates their
-production.[46] Of such collective instances as these, it is easy to
-see the importance, and its reason. They lead us to a general law by an
-induction which offers itself spontaneously, and thus furnish advanced
-points in our enquiries; and when we start from these, already “a
-thousand steps are lost.”
-
-(195.) A fine example of a collective instance is that of the system
-of Jupiter or Saturn with its satellites. We have here, in miniature,
-and seen at one view, a system similar to that of the planets about
-the sun; of which, from the circumstance of our being involved in it,
-and unfavourably situated for seeing it otherwise than in detail, we
-are incapacitated from forming a general idea but by slow progressive
-efforts of reason. Accordingly, the contemplation of the _circumjovial
-planets_ (as they were called) most materially assisted in securing the
-admission of the Copernican system.
-
-(196.) Of “Crucial instances” we have also already spoken, as affording
-the readiest and securest means of eliminating extraneous causes, and
-deciding between rival hypotheses. Owing to the disposition of the
-mind to form hypotheses, and to prejudge cases, it constantly happens
-that, among all the possible suppositions which may occur, two or three
-principal ones occupy us, to the exclusion of the rest; or it may
-be that, if we have been less precipitate, out of a great multitude
-rejected for obvious inapplicability to some one or other case, two or
-three of better claims remain for decision; and this such instances
-enable us to do. One of the instances cited by Bacon in illustration of
-his crucial class is very remarkable, being neither more nor less than
-the proposal of a direct experiment to determine whether the tendency
-of heavy bodies downwards is a result of some peculiar mechanism in
-themselves, or of the attraction of the earth “by the corporeal mass
-thereof, as by a collection of bodies of the same nature.” If it be so,
-he says, “it will follow that the nearer all bodies approach to the
-earth, the stronger and with the greater force and velocity they will
-tend to it; but the farther they are, the weaker and slower:” and his
-experiment consists in comparing the effect of a spring and a weight
-in keeping up the motions of two “clocks,” regulated together, and
-removed alternately to the tops of high buildings and into the deepest
-mines. By _clocks_ he could not have meant pendulum clocks, which were
-not then known, (the first made in England was in 1662,) _fly_-clocks,
-so that the comparison, though too coarse, was not contrary to sound
-mechanical principles. In short, its principle was the comparison of
-the effect of a spring with that of a weight, in producing certain
-motions in certain times, on heights and in mines. Now, this is the
-very same thing that has really been done in the recent experiments
-of professors Airy and Whewell in Dolcoath mine: a pendulum (a weight
-moved by gravity) has been compared with a chronometer balance, moved
-and regulated by a spring. In his 37th aphorism, Bacon also speaks of
-gravity as an incorporeal power, acting at a distance, and _requiring
-time for its transmission_; a consideration which occurred at a later
-period to Laplace, in one of his most delicate investigations.
-
-(197.) A well chosen and strongly marked crucial instance is,
-sometimes, of the highest importance; when two theories, which run
-parallel to each other (as is sometimes the case) in their explanation
-of great classes of phenomena, at length come to be placed at issue
-upon a single fact. A beautiful instance of this will be cited in the
-next section. We may add to the examples above given of such instances,
-that of the application of chemical tests, which are almost universally
-crucial experiments.
-
-(198.) Bacon’s “travelling instances” are those in which the _nature_
-or quality under investigation “travels,” or varies in degree; and thus
-(according to § 152.) afford an indication of a cause by a gradation
-of intensity in the effect. One of his instances is very happy, being
-that of “paper, which is white when dry, but proves less so when wet,
-and comes nearer to the state of transparency upon the exclusion of the
-air, and admission of water.” In reading this, and many other instances
-in the Novum Organum, one would almost suppose (had it been written)
-that its author had taken them from Newton’s Optics.
-
-(199.) The travelling instances, as well as what Bacon terms “frontier
-instances,” are cases in which we are enabled to trace that general
-law which seems to pervade all nature--the law, as it is termed, of
-continuity, and which is expressed in the well known sentence, “Natura
-non agit per saltum.” The pursuit of this law into cases where its
-application is not at first sight obvious, has proved a fertile source
-of physical discovery, and led us to the knowledge of an analogy and
-intimate connection of phenomena between which at first we should never
-have expected to find any.
-
-(200.) For example, the transparency of gold leaf, which permits a
-bluish-green light to pass through it, is a frontier instance between
-the transparency of pellucid bodies and the opacity of metals, and it
-prevents a breach of the law of continuity between transparent and
-opake bodies, by exhibiting a body of the class generally regarded
-the most opake in nature, as still possessed of some slight degree
-of transparency. It thus proves that the quality of opacity is not a
-_contrary_ or _antagonist_ quality to that of transparency, but only
-its extreme lowest degree.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. VII.
-
- OF THE HIGHER DEGREES OF INDUCTIVE GENERALIZATION, AND OF THE
- FORMATION AND VERIFICATION OF THEORIES.
-
-
-(201.) As particular inductions and laws of the first degree of
-generality are obtained from the consideration of individual facts,
-so Theories result from a consideration of these laws, and of the
-proximate causes brought into view in the previous process, regarded
-all together as constituting a new set of phenomena, the creatures
-of reason rather than of sense, and each representing under general
-language innumerable particular facts. In raising these higher
-inductions, therefore, more scope is given to the exercise of pure
-reason than in slowly groping out our first results. The mind is more
-disencumbered of matter, and moves as it were in its own element. What
-is now before it, it perceives more intimately, and less through the
-medium of sense, or at least not in the same manner as when actually at
-work on the immediate objects of sense. But it must not be therefore
-supposed that, in the formation of theories, we are abandoned to
-the unrestrained exercise of imagination, or at liberty to lay down
-arbitrary principles, or assume the existence of mere fanciful causes.
-The liberty of speculation which we possess in the domains of theory is
-not like the wild licence of the slave broke loose from his fetters,
-but rather like that of the freeman who has learned the lessons of
-self-restraint in the school of just subordination. The ultimate
-objects we pursue in the highest theories are the same as those of the
-lowest inductions; and the means by which we can most securely attain
-them bear a close analogy to those which we have found successful in
-such inferior cases.
-
-(202.) The immediate object we propose to ourselves in physical
-theories is the analysis of phenomena, and the knowledge of the hidden
-processes of nature in their production, so far as they can be traced
-by us. An important part of this knowledge consists in a discovery
-of the actual structure or mechanism of the universe and its parts,
-through which, and by which, those processes are executed; and of the
-agents which are concerned in their performance. Now, the mechanism of
-nature is for the most part either on too large or too small a scale
-to be immediately cognizable by our senses; and her agents in like
-manner elude direct observation, and become known to us only by their
-effects. It is in vain therefore that we desire to become witnesses to
-the processes carried on with such means, and to be admitted into the
-secret recesses and laboratories where they are effected. Microscopes
-have been constructed which magnify more than a thousand times in
-_linear_ dimension, so that the smallest visible grain of sand may
-be enlarged to the appearance of one a thousand million times more
-bulky; yet the only impression we receive by viewing it through such
-a magnifier is, that it reminds us of some vast fragment of a rock,
-while the intimate structure on which depend its colour, its hardness,
-and its chemical properties, remains still concealed: we do not seem
-to have made even an approach to a closer analysis of it by any such
-scrutiny.
-
-(203.) On the other hand, the mechanism of the great system of which
-our planet forms a part escapes immediate observation by the immensity
-of its scale, nay, even by the slowness of its evolutions. The motion
-of the minute hand of a watch can hardly be perceived without the
-closest attention, and that of the hour hand not at all. But what are
-these, in respect of the impression of slowness they produce in our
-minds, compared with a revolving movement which takes a whole year, or
-twelve, thirty, or eighty years to complete, as is the case with the
-planets in their revolutions round the sun. Yet no sooner do we come
-to reflect on the linear dimensions of these orbs, (which however we
-do not _see_, nor can we measure them but by a long, circuitous, and
-difficult process,) than we are lost in astonishment at the swiftness
-of the very motions which before seemed so slow.[47] The motion of the
-sails of a windmill offers (on a small scale) an illustrative case. At
-a distance the rotation seems slow and steady--but when we stand close
-to one of the sails in its sweep, we are surprised at the swiftness
-with which it rushes by us.
-
-(204.) Again, the agents employed by nature to act on material
-structures are invisible, and only to be traced by the effects they
-produce. Heat dilates matter with an irresistible force; but what heat
-is, remains yet a problem. A current of electricity passing along a
-wire moves a magnetized needle at a distance; but except from this
-effect we perceive no difference between the condition of the wire
-when it conveys and when it does not convey the stream: and we apply
-the terms current, or stream, to the electricity only because in some
-of its relations it reminds us of something we have observed in a
-stream of air or water. In like manner we see that the moon circulates
-about the earth; and because we believe it to be a solid mass, and
-have never seen one solid substance revolve round another within our
-reach to handle and examine unless retained by a force or united by a
-tie, we conclude that there _is_ a force, and a mode of connection,
-between the moon and the earth; though, what that mode can be, we have
-no conception, nor can imagine _how_ such a force can be exerted at a
-distance, and with empty space, or at most an invisible fluid, between.
-(See § 148.)
-
-(205.) Yet are we not to despair, since we see regular and beautiful
-results brought about in human works by means which nobody would, at
-first sight, think could have any thing to do with them. A sheet of
-blank paper is placed upon a frame, and shoved forwards, and after
-winding its way successively over and under half a dozen rollers, and
-performing many other strange evolutions, comes out printed on both
-sides. And, after all, the acting cause in this process is nothing
-more than a few gallons of water boiled in an iron vessel, at a
-distance from the scene of operations. But _why_ the water so boiled
-should be capable of producing the active energy which sets the whole
-apparatus in motion is, and will probably long remain, a secret to us.
-
-(206.) This, however, does not at all prevent our having a very perfect
-comprehension of the whole subsequent process. We might frequent
-printing-houses, and form a theory of printing, and having worked our
-way up to the point where the mechanical action commenced (the boiler
-of the steam-engine), and verified it by taking to pieces, and putting
-together again, the train of wheels and the presses, and by sound
-theoretical examination of all the transfers of motion from one part to
-another; we should, at length, pronounce our theory good, and declare
-that we understood printing thoroughly. Nay, we might even go away and
-apply the principles of mechanism we had learned in this enquiry to
-other widely different purposes; construct other machines, and put them
-in motion by the same moving power, and all without arriving at any
-correct idea as to the ultimate source of the force employed. But, if
-we were inclined to theorize farther, we might do so; and it is easy
-to imagine how two theorists might form very different _hypotheses_ as
-to the origin of the power which alternately raised and depressed the
-piston-rod of the engine. One, for example, might maintain that the
-boiler (whose contents we will suppose that neither theorist has been
-permitted to examine) was the den of some powerful unknown animal, and
-he would not be without plausible analogies in the warmth, the supply
-of fuel and water, the breathing noises, the smoke, and above all, the
-mechanical power exerted. He would say (not without a show of reason),
-that where there is a positive and wonderful effect, and many strong
-analogies, such as materials consumed, and all the usual signs of life
-maintained, we are not to deny the existence of animal life because
-we know no animal that consumes such food. Nay, he might observe with
-truth, that the fuel actually consists of the chemical ingredients
-which constitute the chief food of all animals, &c.; while, on the
-other hand, his brother theorist, who caught a glimpse of the fire,
-and detected the peculiar sounds of ebullition, might acquire a better
-notion of the case, and form a theory more in consonance with fact.
-
-(207.) Now, nothing is more common in physics than to find two, or even
-many, _theories_ maintained as to the origin of a natural phenomenon.
-For instance, in the case of heat itself, one considers it as a really
-existing material fluid, of such exceeding subtlety as to penetrate
-all bodies, and even to be capable of combining with them chemically;
-while another regards it as nothing but a rapid vibratory or rotatory
-motion in the ultimate particles of the bodies heated; and produces
-a singularly ingenious train of mechanical reasoning to show, that
-there is nothing contradictory to sound dynamical principles in such
-a doctrine. Thus, again, with light: one considers it as consisting
-in actual particles darted forth from luminous bodies, and acted
-upon in their progress by forces of extreme intensity residing in the
-substances on which they strike; another, in the vibratory motion of
-the particles of luminous bodies, communicated to a peculiar subtle and
-highly elastic ethereal medium, filling all space, and conveyed through
-it into our eyes, as sounds are to our ears, by the undulations of the
-air.
-
-(208.) Now, are we to be deterred from framing hypotheses and
-constructing theories, because we meet with such dilemmas, and
-find ourselves frequently beyond our depth? Undoubtedly not. _Est
-quodam prodire tenus si non datur ultra._ Hypotheses, with respect
-to theories, are what presumed proximate causes are with respect to
-particular inductions: they afford us motives for searching into
-analogies; grounds of citation to bring before us all the cases which
-seem to bear upon them, for examination. A well imagined hypothesis,
-if it have been suggested by a fair inductive consideration of general
-laws, can hardly fail at least of enabling us to generalize a step
-farther, and group together several such laws under a more universal
-expression. But this is taking a very limited view of the value and
-importance of hypotheses: it may happen (and it has happened in the
-case of the undulatory doctrine of light) that such a weight of analogy
-and probability may become accumulated on the side of an hypothesis,
-that we are compelled to admit one of two things; either that it is
-an actual statement of what really passes in nature, or that the
-reality, whatever it be, must run so close a parallel with it, as to
-admit of some mode of expression common to both, at least in so far
-as the phenomena actually known are concerned. Now, this is a very
-great step, not only for its own sake, as leading us to a high point in
-philosophical speculation, but for its applications; because whatever
-conclusions we deduce from an hypothesis so supported must have at
-least a strong presumption in their favour: and we may be thus led to
-the trial of many curious experiments, and to the imagining of many
-useful and important contrivances, which we should never otherwise have
-thought of, and which, at all events, if verified in practice, are real
-additions to our stock of knowledge and to the arts of life.
-
-(209.) In framing a theory which shall render a rational account of
-any natural phenomenon, we have _first_ to consider the agents on
-which it depends, or the causes to which we regard it as ultimately
-referable. These agents are not to be arbitrarily assumed; they
-must be such as we have good inductive grounds to believe do exist
-in nature, and do perform a part in phenomena analogous to those we
-would render an account of; or such, whose presence in the actual
-case can be demonstrated by unequivocal signs. They must be _veræ
-causæ_, in short, which we can not only show to exist and to act,
-but the laws of whose action we can derive independently, by direct
-induction, from experiments purposely instituted; or at least make
-such suppositions respecting them as shall not be contrary to our
-experience, and which will remain to be verified by the coincidence of
-the conclusions we shall deduce from them, with facts. For example,
-in the theory of gravitation we suppose an agent,--_viz._ force, or
-mechanical power,--to act on _any_ material body which is placed in
-the presence of _any_ other, and to urge the two mutually towards each
-other. This is a _vera causa_; for heavy bodies (that is, all bodies,
-but some more, some less,) tend to, or endeavour to reach, the earth,
-and require the exertion of force to counteract this endeavour, or
-to keep them up. Now, that which opposes and neutralizes force _is_
-force. And again, a plumb-line, which, when allowed to hang freely,
-always hangs perpendicularly; is found to hang observably aside from
-the perpendicular when in the neighbourhood of a considerable mountain;
-thereby proving that a force is exerted upon it, which draws it towards
-the mountain. Moreover, since it is a fact that the moon does circulate
-about the earth, it must be drawn towards the earth by a force; for if
-there were no force acting upon it, it would go on in a straight line
-without turning aside to circulate in an orbit, and would, therefore,
-soon go away and be lost in space. This force, then, which we call the
-_force_ of gravity, is a real cause.
-
-(210.) We have next to consider the laws which regulate the action of
-these our primary agents; and these we can only arrive at in three
-ways: 1st, By inductive reasoning; that is, by examining all the
-cases in which we know them to be exercised, inferring, as well as
-circumstances will permit, its amount or intensity in each particular
-case, and then piecing together, as it were, these _disjecta membra_,
-generalizing from them, and so arriving at the laws desired; 2dly,
-By forming at once a bold hypothesis, particularizing the law,
-and trying the truth of it by following out its consequences and
-comparing them with facts; or, 3dly, By a process partaking of both
-these, and combining the advantages of both without their defects,
-viz. by assuming indeed the laws we would discover, but so generally
-expressed, that they shall include an unlimited variety of particular
-laws;--following out the consequences of this assumption, by the
-application of such general principles as the case admits;--comparing
-them in succession with all the particular cases within our knowledge;
-and, lastly, _on this comparison_, so modifying and restricting the
-general enunciation of our laws as to _make the results agree_.
-
-(211.) All these three processes for the discovery of those general
-elementary laws on which the higher theories are grounded are
-applicable with different advantage in different circumstances.
-We might exemplify their successive application to the case of
-gravitation: but as this would rather lead into a disquisition too
-particular for the objects of this discourse, and carry us too much
-into the domain of technical mathematics, we shall content ourselves
-with remarking, that the method last mentioned is that which
-mathematicians (especially such as have a considerable command of
-those general modes of representing and reasoning on quantity, which
-constitute the higher analysis,) find the most universally applicable,
-and the most efficacious; and that it is applicable with especial
-advantage in cases where subordinate inductions of the kind described
-in the last section have already led to laws of a certain generality
-admitting of mathematical expression. Such a case, for instance,
-is the elliptic motion of a planet, which is a general proposition
-including the statement of an infinite number of particular _places_,
-in which the laws of its motion allow it to be some time or other
-found, and for which, of course, the law of force must be so assumed as
-to account.
-
-(212.) With regard to the first process of the three above enumerated,
-it is in fact an induction of the kind described in § 185.; and all
-the remarks we there made on that kind of induction apply to it in
-this stage. The direct assumption of a particular hypothesis has been
-occasionally practised very successfully. As examples, we may mention
-Coulomb’s and Poisson’s theories of electricity and magnetism, in
-both which, phenomena of a very complicated and interesting nature
-are referred to the actions of attractive and repulsive forces,
-following a law similar in its expression to the law of gravitation.
-But the difficulty and labour, which, in the greater theories, always
-attends the pursuit of a fundamental law into its remote consequences,
-effectually precludes this method from being commonly resorted to as
-a means of discovery, unless we have some good reason, from analogy
-or otherwise, for believing that the attempt will prove successful,
-or have been first led by partial inductions to particular laws which
-naturally point it out for trial.
-
-(213.) In this case the law assumes all the characters of a general
-phenomenon resulting from an induction of particulars, but not yet
-verified by comparison with _all_ the particulars, nor extended to all
-that it is capable of including. (See § 171.) It is the verification
-of such inductions which constitutes theory in its largest sense, and
-which embraces an estimation of the influence of all such circumstances
-as may modify the effect of the cause whose laws of action we have
-arrived at and would verify. To return to our example: particular
-inductions drawn from the motions of the several planets about the
-sun, and of the satellites round their primaries, &c. having led us
-to the general conception of an attractive force exerted by every
-particle of matter in the universe on every other according to the law
-to which we attach the name of gravitation; when we would verify this
-induction, we must set out with assuming this law, considering the
-whole system as subjected to its influence and implicitly obeying it,
-and nothing interfering with its action; we then, for the first time,
-perceive a train of modifying circumstances which had not occurred to
-us when reasoning upwards from particulars to obtain the fundamental
-law; we perceive that _all the planets_ must attract _each other_,
-must therefore draw each other out of the orbits which they would
-have if acted on only by the sun; and as this was never contemplated
-in the inductive process, its validity becomes a question, which can
-only be determined by ascertaining precisely how great a deviation
-this new class of mutual actions will produce. To do this is no easy
-task, or rather, it is the most difficult task which the genius of
-man has ever yet accomplished: still, it _has_ been accomplished by
-the mere application of the general laws of dynamics; and the result
-(undoubtedly a most beautiful and satisfactory one) is, that all
-those observed deviations in the motions of our system which stood
-out as exceptions (§ 154.), or were noticed as residual phenomena and
-reserved for further enquiry (§ 158.), in that imperfect view of the
-subject which we got in the subordinate process by which we rose to
-our general conclusion, prove to be the immediate consequences of the
-above-mentioned mutual actions. As such, they are neither exceptions
-nor residual facts, but fulfilments of general rules, and essential
-features in the statement of the case, _without_ which our induction
-would be invalid, and the law of gravitation positively untrue.
-
-(214.) In the theory of gravitation, the law is all in all, applying
-itself at once to the materials, and directly producing the result.
-But in many other cases we have to consider not merely the laws
-which regulate the actions of our ultimate causes, but a system of
-mechanism, or a structure of parts, through the intervention of which
-their effects become sensible to us. Thus, in the delicate and curious
-electro-dynamic theory of Ampere, the mutual attraction or repulsion
-of two magnets is referred to a more universal phenomenon, the mutual
-action of electric currents, according to a certain fundamental law.
-But, in order to bring the case of a magnet within the range of this
-law, he is obliged to make a supposition of a peculiar structure or
-mechanism, which constitutes a body a magnet, viz. that around each
-particle of the body there shall be constantly circulating, in a
-certain stated direction, a small current of electric fluid.
-
-(215.) This, we may say, is too complex; it is artificial, and cannot
-be granted: yet, if the admission of this or any other structure
-tenfold more artificial and complicated will enable any one to present
-in a general point of view a great number of particular facts,--to make
-them a part of one system, and enable us to reason from the known to
-the unknown, and actually to _predict facts before trial_,--we would
-ask, why should it _not_ be granted? When we examine those instances
-of nature’s workmanship which we can take to pieces and understand,
-we find them in the highest degree artificial in our own sense of the
-word. Take, for example, the structure of an eye, or of the skeleton of
-an animal,--what complexity and what artifice! In the one, a _pellucid
-muscle_; a lens formed with elliptical surfaces; a circular aperture
-capable of enlargement or contraction without loss of form. In the
-other, a framework of the most curious carpentry; in which occurs
-not a single straight line, nor any known geometrical curve, yet all
-evidently systematic, and constructed by rules which defy our research.
-Or examine a crystallized mineral, which we can in some measure
-dissect, and thus obtain direct evidence of an internal structure.
-Neither artifice nor complication are here wanting; and though it
-is easy to assert that these appearances are, after all, produced
-by something which would be very simple, if we did but know it, it
-is plain that the same might be _said_ of a steam-engine executing
-the most complicated movements, previous to any investigation of its
-nature, or any knowledge of the source of its power.
-
-(216.) In estimating, however, the value of a theory, we are not to
-look, _in the first instance_, to the question, whether it establishes
-satisfactorily, or not, a particular process or mechanism; for of
-this, after all, we can never obtain more than that indirect evidence
-which consists in its leading to the same results. What, in the actual
-state of science, is far more important for us to know, is whether our
-theory truly represent _all_ the facts, and include _all_ the laws, to
-which observation and induction lead. A theory which did this would,
-no doubt, go a great way to establish any hypothesis of mechanism or
-structure, which might form an essential part of it: but this is very
-far from being the case, except in a few limited instances; and, till
-it is so, to lay any great stress on hypotheses of the kind, except in
-as much as they serve as a scaffold for the erection of general laws,
-is to “quite mistake the scaffold for the pile.” Regarded in this
-light, hypotheses have often an eminent use: and a facility in framing
-them, if attended with an equal facility in laying them aside when
-they have served their turn, is one of the most valuable qualities a
-philosopher can possess; while, on the other hand, a bigoted adherence
-to them, or indeed to peculiar views of any kind, in opposition to the
-tenor of facts as they arise, is the bane of all philosophy.
-
-(217.) There is no doubt, however, that the safest course, when it
-can be followed, is to rise by inductions carried on among laws, as
-among facts, from law to law, perceiving, as we go on, how laws which
-we have looked upon as unconnected become particular cases, either
-one of the other, or all of one still more general, and, at length,
-blend altogether in the point of view from which we learn to regard
-them. An example will illustrate what we mean. It is a general law,
-that all hot bodies throw out or _radiate_ heat in all directions, (by
-which we mean, not that heat is an actual substance darted out from hot
-bodies, but only that the laws of the transmission of heat to distant
-objects are similar to those which would regulate the distribution
-of particles thrown forth in all directions,) and that other colder
-bodies placed in their neighbourhood become hot, _as if_ they received
-the heat so radiated. Again, all solid bodies which become heated in
-one part _conduct_, or diffuse, the heat from that part through their
-whole substance. Here we have two modes of communicating heat,--by
-radiation, and by conduction; and both these have their peculiar,
-and, to all appearance, very different laws. Now, let us bring a hot
-and a cold body (of the same substance) gradually nearer and nearer
-together,--as they approach, the heat will be communicated from the hot
-to the cold one by the _laws of radiation_; and from the nearer to the
-farther part of the colder one, as it gradually grows warm, by _those
-of conduction_. Let their distance be diminished till they just lightly
-touch. How does the heat _now_ pass from one to the other? Doubtless,
-by radiation; for it may be proved, that in such a contact there is yet
-an interval. Let them then be _forced_ together, and it will seem clear
-that it must now be by _conduction_. Yet their _interval_ must diminish
-gradually, as the force by which they are pressed together increases,
-till they actually cohere, and form one. The law of continuity, then,
-of which we have before spoken (§ 199.), forbids us to suppose that
-the intimate nature of the process of communication is changed in this
-transition from light to violent contact, and from that to actual
-union. If so, we might ask, at what point does the change happen?
-Especially since it is also demonstrable, that the particles of the
-most solid body are not, really, in contact. _Therefore_, the laws of
-conduction and radiation have a mutual dependence, and the former are
-only extreme cases of the latter. If, then, we would rightly understand
-what passes, or what is the process of nature in the slow communication
-of heat through the substance of a solid, we must ground our enquiries
-upon what takes place at a distance, and then urge the laws to which we
-have arrived, up to their extreme case.
-
-(218.) When two theories run parallel to each other, and each explains
-a great many facts in common with the other, any experiment which
-affords a crucial instance to decide between them, or by which one or
-other must fall, is of great importance. In thus verifying theories,
-since they are grounded on general laws, we may appeal, not merely
-to particular cases, but to whole classes of facts; and we therefore
-have a great range among the individuals of these for the selection
-of some particular effect which ought to take place oppositely in the
-event of one of the two suppositions at issue being right and the other
-wrong. A curious example is given by M. Fresnel, as decisive, in his
-mind, of the question between the two great opinions on the nature
-of light, which, since the time of Newton and Huyghens, have divided
-philosophers. (See § 207.) When two very clean glasses are laid one
-on the other, if they be not perfectly flat, but one or both in an
-almost imperceptible degree convex or prominent, beautiful and vivid
-colours will be seen between them; and if these be viewed through a
-red glass, their appearance will be that of alternate dark and bright
-stripes. These stripes are formed _between_ the two surfaces in
-apparent contact, as any one may satisfy himself by using, instead of
-a flat _plate_ of glass for the upper one, a triangular-shaped piece,
-called a prism, like a three-cornered stick, and looking through the
-inclined side of it next the eye, by which arrangement the reflection
-of light from the upper surface is prevented from intermixing with that
-from the surfaces in contact. Now, the coloured stripes thus produced
-are explicable on both theories, and are appealed to by both as strong
-confirmatory facts; but there is a difference in one circumstance
-according as one or the other theory is employed to explain them.
-In the case of the Huyghenian doctrine, the intervals between the
-bright stripes ought to appear _absolutely black_; in the other,
-_half bright_, when so viewed through a prism. This curious case of
-difference was tried as soon as the opposing consequences of the two
-theories were noted by M. Fresnel, and the result is stated by him to
-be decisive in favour of that theory which makes light to consist in
-the vibrations of an elastic medium.
-
-(219.) Theories are best arrived at by the consideration of general
-laws; but most securely verified by comparing them with particular
-facts, because this serves as a verification of the whole train
-of induction, from the lowest term to the highest. But then, the
-comparison must be made with facts purposely selected so as to include
-every variety of case, not omitting extreme ones, and in sufficient
-number to afford every reasonable probability of detecting error. A
-single numerical coincidence in a final conclusion, however striking
-the coincidence or important the subject, is not sufficient. Newton’s
-theory of sound, for example, leads to a numerical expression for the
-actual velocity of sound, differing but little from that afforded by
-the correct theory afterwards explained by Lagrange, and (when certain
-considerations not contemplated by him are allowed for) agreeing with
-fact; yet this coincidence is no verification of Newton’s view of the
-general subject of sound, which is defective in an essential point,
-as the great geometer last named has very satisfactorily shown. This
-example is sufficient to inspire caution in resting the verification of
-theories upon any thing but a very extensive comparison with a great
-mass of observed facts.
-
-(220.) But, on the other hand, when a theory will bear the test
-of such extensive comparison, it matters little how it has been
-originally framed. However strange and, at first sight, inadmissible
-its postulates may appear, or however singular it may seem that
-such postulates should have been fixed upon,--if they only lead
-us, by legitimate reasonings, to conclusions in exact accordance
-with numerous observations purposely made under such a variety of
-circumstances as fairly to embrace the whole range of the phenomena
-which the theory is intended to account for, we cannot refuse to admit
-them; or if we still hesitate to regard them as demonstrated truths, we
-cannot, at least, object to receive them as temporary substitutes for
-such truths, until the latter shall become known. If they suffice to
-explain all the phenomena known, it becomes highly improbable that they
-will not explain more; and if all their conclusions we have tried have
-proved correct, it is probable that others yet untried will be found so
-too; so that _in rejecting them altogether, we should reject all the
-discoveries to which they may lead_.
-
-(221.) In all theories which profess to give a true account of the
-process of nature in the production of any class of phenomena, by
-referring them to general laws, or to the action of general causes,
-through a train of modifying circumstances; before we can apply those
-laws, or trace the action of those causes in any assigned case, we
-require to know the circumstances: we must have data whereon to ground
-their application. Now, these can be learned only from observation;
-and it may seem to be arguing in a vicious circle to have recourse
-to observation for any part of those theoretical conclusions, by
-whose comparison with fact the theory itself is to be tried. The
-consideration of an example will enable us to remove this difficulty.
-The most general law which has yet been discovered in chemistry is
-this, that all the elementary substances in nature are susceptible of
-entering into combination with each other only in fixed or _definite
-proportions_ by weight, and not arbitrarily; so that when any two
-substances are put together with a view to unite them, if their weights
-are not in some certain determinate proportion, a complete combination
-will not take place, but some part of one or the other ingredient will
-remain over and above, and uncombined. Suppose, now, we have found a
-substance having all the outward characters of a homogeneous or unmixed
-body, but which, on analysis, we discover to consist of sulphur, and
-lead in the proportion of 20 parts of the former to 130 of the latter
-ingredient; and we would know whether this is to be regarded as a
-verification of the law of definite proportions or an exception to
-it. The question is reduced to this, whether the proportion 20 to 130
-be or be not _that_ fixed and definite proportion, (or one of them,
-if there be more than one proportion possible,) in which, according
-to the law in question, sulphur and lead can combine; now, this can
-never be decided by merely looking at the law in all its generality.
-It is clear, that when particularized by restricting its expression
-to sulphur and lead, the law should state _what are_ those particular
-fixed proportions in which these bodies can combine. That is to say,
-there must be certain data or numbers, by which these are distinguished
-from all other bodies in nature, and which require to be known before
-we can apply the general law to the particular case. To determine such
-data, observation must be consulted; and if we were to have recourse
-to that of the combination of the two substances in question with each
-other, no doubt there would be ground for the logical objection of
-a vicious circle: but this is not done; the determination of these
-numerical data is derived from experiments purposely made on a great
-variety of different combinations, among which that under consideration
-does not of necessity occur, and all these being found, independently
-of each other, to agree in giving the same results, they are therefore
-safely assumed as part of the system. Thus, the law of definite
-proportions, when applied to the actual state of nature, requires two
-separate statements, the one announcing the general law of combination,
-the other particularizing the numbers appropriate to the several
-elements of which natural bodies consist, or the data of nature. Among
-these data, if arranged in a list, there will be found opposite to the
-element sulphur the number 16, and opposite to lead, 104[48]; and since
-20 is to 130 in the exact proportion of 16 to 104, it appears that the
-combination in question affords a satisfactory verification of the law.
-
-(222.) The great importance of physical data of this description,
-and the advantage of having them well determined, will be obvious,
-if we consider, that a list of them, when taken in combination with
-the general law, affords the means of determining at once the exact
-proportion of the ingredients of all natural compounds, if we only know
-the place they hold in the system. In chemistry, the number of admitted
-elements is between fifty and sixty, and new ones are added continually
-as the science advances. Now, the moment the number corresponding to
-any new substance added to the list is determined, we have, in fact,
-ascertained all the proportions in which it can enter into combination
-with all the others, so that a careful experiment made with the object
-of determining this number is, in fact, equivalent to as many different
-experiments as there are binary, ternary, or yet more complicated
-combinations capable of existing, into which the new substance may
-enter, as an ingredient.
-
-(223.) The importance of obtaining exact physical data can scarcely
-be too much insisted on, for without them the most elaborate theories
-are little better than mere inapplicable forms of words. It would be
-of little consequence to be informed, abstractedly, that the sun and
-planets attract each other, with forces proportional to their masses,
-and inversely as the squares of their distances: but, as soon as we
-know the data of our system, as soon as we have an accurate statement
-(no matter how obtained) of the distances, masses, and actual motions
-of the several bodies which compose it, we need no more to enable us to
-predict all the movements of its several parts, and the changes that
-will happen in it for thousands of years to come; and even to extend
-our views backwards into time, and recover from the past, phenomena,
-which no observation has noted, and no history recorded, and which yet
-(it is possible) may have left indelible traces of their existence in
-their influence on the state of nature in our own globe, and those of
-the other planets.
-
-(224.) The proof, too, that our data _are_ correctly assumed, is
-involved in the general verification of the whole theory, of which,
-when once assumed, they form a part; and the same comparison with
-observation which enables us to decide on the truth of the abstract
-principle, enables us, at the same time, to ascertain whether we
-have fixed the values of our data in accordance with the actual
-state of nature. If not, it becomes an important question, whether
-the assumed values can be corrected, so as to bring the results of
-theory to agree with facts? Thus it happens, that as theories approach
-to their perfection, a more and more exact determination of data
-becomes requisite. Deviations from observed fact, which, in a first
-or approximative verification, may be disregarded as trifling, become
-important when a high degree of precision is attained. A difference
-between the calculated and observed places of a planet, which would
-have been disregarded by Kepler in his verification of the law of
-elliptic motion, would now be considered fatal to the theory of
-gravity, unless it could be shown to arise from an erroneous assumption
-of some of the numerical data of our system.
-
-(225.) The observations most appropriate for the ready and exact
-determination of physical data are, therefore, those which it is most
-necessary to have performed with exactness and perseverance. Hence
-it is, that their performance, in many cases, becomes a national
-concern, and observatories are erected and maintained, and expeditions
-despatched to distant regions, at an expense which, to a superficial
-view, would appear most disproportioned to their objects. But it
-may very reasonably be asked why the direct assistance afforded by
-governments to the execution of continued series of observations
-adapted to this especial end should continue to be, as it has hitherto
-almost exclusively been, confined to astronomy.
-
-(226.) Physical data intended to be employed as elements of calculation
-in extensive theories, require to be known with a much greater degree
-of exactness than any single observation possesses, not only on account
-of their dignity and importance, as affording the means of representing
-an indefinite multitude of facts; but because, in the variety of
-combinations that may arise, or in the changes that circumstances may
-undergo, cases will occur when any trifling error in one of the data
-may become enormously magnified in the final result to be compared
-with observation. Thus, in the case of an eclipse of the sun, when
-the moon enters very obliquely upon the sun’s disc, a trifling error
-in the diameter of either the sun or moon may make a great one in the
-time when the eclipse shall be announced to commence. It ought to
-be remarked, that these are, of all others, the conjunctures where
-observations are most available for the determination of data; for,
-by the same rule that a small change in the data will, in such cases,
-produce a great one in the thing to be observed; so, _vice versâ_, any
-moderate amount of error, committed in an observation undertaken for
-ascertaining its value, can produce but a very trifling one in the
-_reverse_ calculation from which the data come to be determined by
-observation. This remark extends to every description of physical data
-in every department of science, and is never to be overlooked when the
-object in view is the determination of data with the last degree of
-precision.
-
-(227.) But how, it may be asked, are we to ascertain _by_ observation,
-data more precise than observation itself? How are we to conclude the
-value of that which we do not see, with greater certainty than that
-of quantities which we actually see and measure? It is the number of
-observations which may be brought to bear on the determination of data
-that enables us to do this. Whatever error we may commit in a single
-determination, it is highly improbable that we should always err the
-same way, so that, when we come to take an average of a great number of
-determinations, (unless there be some constant cause which gives a bias
-one way or the other,) we cannot fail, at length, to obtain a very near
-approximation to the truth, and, even allowing a bias, to come much
-nearer to it than can fairly be expected from any single observation,
-liable to be influenced by the same bias.
-
-(228.) This useful and valuable property of the average of a great
-many observations, that it brings us nearer to the truth than any
-single observation can be relied on as doing, renders it the most
-constant resource in all physical enquiries where accuracy is desired.
-And it is surprising what a rapid effect, in equalizing fluctuations
-and destroying deviations, a moderate multiplication of individual
-observations has. A better example can hardly be taken than the average
-height of the quicksilver in the common barometer, which measures
-the pressure of the air, and whose fluctuations are proverbial.
-Nevertheless, if we only observe it regularly every day, and, at the
-end of each month, take an average of the observed heights, we shall
-find the fluctuations surprisingly diminished in amount; and if we
-go on for a whole year, or for many years in succession, the annual
-averages will be found to agree with still greater exactness. This
-equalizing power of averages, by destroying all such fluctuations as
-are irregular or accidental, frequently enables us to obtain evidence
-of fluctuations really regular, periodic in their recurrence, and
-so much smaller in their amount than the accidental ones, that, but
-for this mode of proceeding, they never would have become apparent.
-Thus, if the height of the barometer be observed four times a day,
-constantly, for a few months, and the averages taken, it will be seen
-that a regular _daily_ fluctuation, of very small amount, takes place,
-the quicksilver rising and falling twice in the four-and-twenty hours.
-It is by such observations that we are enabled to ascertain--what no
-single measure (unless by a fortunate coincidence), could give us any
-idea, and never any certain knowledge of--the true _sea level_ at any
-part of the coast, or the height at which the water of the ocean would
-stand, if perfectly undisturbed by winds, waves, or tides: a subject of
-very great importance, and upon which it would be highly desirable to
-possess an extensive series of observations, at a great many points on
-the coasts of the principal continents and islands over the whole globe.
-
-(229.) In all cases where there is a direct and simple relation between
-the phenomenon observed and a single _datum_ on which it depends,
-every single observation will give a value of this quantity, and the
-average of all (under certain restrictions) will be its exact value. We
-say, under certain restrictions; for, if the circumstances under which
-the observations are made be not alike, they may not all be equally
-favourable to exactness, and it would be doing injustice to those most
-advantageous, to class them with the rest. In such cases as these,
-as well as in cases where the _data_ are numerous and complicated
-together, so as not to admit of single, separate determination (a
-thing of continual occurrence), we have to enter into very nice, and
-often not a little intricate, considerations respecting the _probable_
-accuracy of our results, or the limits of error within which it is
-_probable_ they lie. In so doing we are obliged to have recourse to
-a refined and curious branch of mathematical enquiry, called the
-doctrine of probabilities, the object of which (as its name imports)
-is to reduce our estimation of the probability of any conclusion to
-calculation, so as to be able to give more than a mere guess at the
-degree of reliance which ought to be placed in it.
-
-(230.) To give some general idea of the considerations which such
-computations involve, let us imagine a person firing with a pistol
-at a wafer on a wall ten yards distant: we might, in a general way,
-take it for granted, that he would hit the wall, but not the wafer,
-at the first shot; but if we would form any thing like a probable
-conjecture of _how near_ he would come to it, we must first have an
-idea of his skill. No better way of judging could be devised than
-by letting him fire a hundred shots at it, and marking where they
-all struck. Suppose this done,--suppose the wafer has been hit once
-or twice, that a certain number of balls have hit the wall within an
-inch of it, a certain number between one and two inches, and so on,
-and that one or two have been some feet wide of the mark. Still the
-question arises, what estimate are we thence to form of his skill? how
-_near_ (or nearer) may we, after this experience, safely, or at least
-not unfairly, bet that he will come to the mark the next subsequent
-shot? This the laws of probability enable us on such data to say.
-Again, suppose, _before_ we were allowed to measure the distances,
-the wafer were to have been taken away, and we were called upon, on
-the mere evidence of the marks on the wall, to say where it had been
-placed; it is clear that no reasoning would enable any one to say with
-certainty; yet there is assuredly one place which we may fix on with
-greater probability of being right than any other. Now, this is a very
-similar case to that of an observer--an astronomer for example--who
-would determine the exact place of a heavenly body. He points to it
-his telescope, and obtains a series of results disagreeing among
-themselves, but yet all agreeing within certain limits, and only a
-comparatively small number of them deviating considerably from the mean
-of all; and from these he is called upon to say, definitively, what he
-shall consider to have been the most probable place of his star at the
-moment. Just so in the calculation of physical _data_; where no two
-results agree exactly, and where all come within limits, some wide,
-some close, what have we to guide us when we would make up our minds
-what to conclude respecting them? It is evident that any system of
-calculation that can be shown to lead of necessity to the most probable
-conclusion where certainty is not to be had must be valuable. However,
-as this doctrine is one of the most difficult and delicate among the
-applications of mathematics to natural philosophy, this slight mention
-of it must suffice at present.
-
-(231.) In the foregoing pages we have endeavoured to explain the spirit
-of the methods to which, since the revival of philosophy, natural
-science has been indebted for the great and splendid advances it has
-made. What we have all along most earnestly desired to impress on the
-student is, that natural philosophy is essentially united in all its
-departments, through all which one spirit reigns and one method of
-enquiry applies. It cannot, however, be studied as a whole, without
-subdivision into parts; and, in the remainder of this discourse, we
-shall therefore take a summary view of the progress which has been made
-in the different branches into which it may be most advantageously
-so subdivided, and endeavour to give a general idea of the nature of
-each, and of its relations to the rest. In the course of this, we shall
-have frequent opportunity to point out the influence of those general
-principles we have above endeavoured to explain, on the progress of
-discovery. But this we shall only do as cases arise, without entering
-into any regular analysis of the history of each department with that
-view. Such an analysis would, indeed, be a most useful and valuable
-work, but would far exceed our present limits. We are not, however,
-without a hope that this great desideratum in science will, ere long,
-be supplied from a quarter every way calculated to do it justice.
-
-
-
-
- PART III.
-
- OF THE SUBDIVISION OF PHYSICS INTO DISTINCT BRANCHES,
- AND THEIR MUTUAL RELATIONS.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER I.
-
-OF THE PHENOMENA OF FORCE, AND OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NATURAL BODIES.
-
-
-(232.) Natural History may be considered in two very different lights:
-either, 1st, as a collection of facts and objects presented by nature,
-from the examination, analysis, and combination of which we acquire
-whatever knowledge we are capable of attaining both of the order of
-nature, and of the agents she employs for producing her ends, and from
-which, therefore, all sciences arise; or, 2dly, as an assemblage of
-phenomena to be explained; of effects to be deduced from causes; and of
-materials prepared to our hands, for the application of our principles
-to useful purposes. Natural history, therefore, considered in the
-one or the other of these points of view, is either the beginning or
-the end of physical science. As it offers to us, in a confused and
-interwoven mass, the elements of all our knowledge, our business is to
-disentangle, to arrange, and to present them in a separate and distinct
-state: and to this end we are called upon to resolve the important but
-complicated problem,--Given the effect, or assemblage of effects, to
-find the causes. The principles on which this enquiry relies are those
-which constitute the relation of cause and effect, as it exists with
-reference to our minds; and their rules and mode of application have
-been attempted to be sketched out, (though in far less detail than the
-intrinsic interest of the subject, both in a logical and practical
-point of view, would demand,) in the foregoing pages. It remains
-now to bring together, in a summary statement, the results of the
-general examination of nature, so far as it has been prosecuted to the
-discovery of natural agents, and the mode in which they act.
-
-(233.) The first great agent which the analysis of natural phenomena
-offers to our consideration, more frequently and prominently than
-any other, is force. Its effects are either, 1st, to counteract the
-exertion of opposing force, and thereby to maintain _equilibrium_; or,
-2dly, to produce _motion_ in matter.
-
-(234.) Matter, or that, whatever it be, of which all the objects in
-nature which manifest themselves directly to our senses consist,
-presents us with two general qualities, which at first sight appear
-to stand in contradiction to each other--activity and inertness. Its
-activity is proved by its power of spontaneously setting other matter
-in motion, and of itself obeying their mutual impulse, and moving
-under the influence of its own and other force; inertness, in refusing
-to move unless obliged to do so by a force impressed externally, or
-mutually exerted between itself and other matter, and by persisting in
-its state of motion or rest unless disturbed by some external cause.
-Yet in reality this contradiction is only apparent. Force being the
-cause, and motion the effect produced by it on matter, to say that
-matter is inert, or has _inertia_, as it is termed, is only to say
-that the cause is expended in producing its effect, and that the
-same cause cannot (without renewal) produce double or triple its own
-proper effect. In this point of view, equilibrium may be conceived as
-a continual production of two opposite effects, each undoing at every
-instant what the other has done.
-
-(235.) However, if this should appear too metaphysical, at all events
-this difference of effects gives rise to two great divisions of the
-science of force, which are commonly known by the names of STATICS and
-DYNAMICS; the latter term, which is general, and has been used by us
-before in its general sense, being usually confined to the doctrine
-of motion, as produced and modified by force. Each of these great
-divisions again branches out into distinct subdivisions, according as
-we consider the equilibrium or motion of matter in the three distinct
-states in which it is presented to us in nature, the solid, liquid, and
-aëriform state, to which, perhaps, ought to be added the _viscous_,
-as a state intermediate between that of solidity and fluidity, the
-consideration of which, though very obscure and difficult, offers a
-high degree of interest on a variety of accounts.
-
-
-_Statics and Dynamics._
-
-(236.) The principles have been definitively fixed by Galileo and his
-successors, down to Newton, on a basis of sound induction; and as they
-are perfectly general, and apply to every case, they are competent,
-as we have already before observed, to the solution of every problem
-that can occur in the deductive processes, by which phenomena are
-to be explained, or effects calculated. Hence, they include every
-question that can arise respecting the motions and rest of the smallest
-particles of matter, as well as of the largest masses. But the mode of
-reasoning from these general principles differs materially, whether
-we consider them as applied to masses of matter of a sensible size,
-or to those excessively minute, and perhaps indivisible, molecules of
-which such masses are composed. The investigations which relate to the
-latter subject are extremely intricate, as they necessarily involve the
-consideration of the hypotheses we may form respecting the intimate
-constitution of the several sorts of bodies above enumerated.
-
-(237.) On the other hand, those which respect the equilibrium and
-motions of sensible masses of matter are happily capable of being
-so managed as to render unnecessary the adoption of any particular
-hypothesis of structure. Thus, in reasoning respecting the application
-of forces to a solid mass, we suppose its parts indissolubly and
-unalterably connected; it matters not by what tie, provided this
-condition be satisfied, that one point of it cannot be moved without
-setting all the rest in motion, so that the relative situation of the
-parts one among another be not changed. This is the abstract notion
-of a solid which the mechanician employs in his reasonings. And their
-conclusions will apply to natural bodies, of course, only so far as
-they conform to such a definition. In strictness of speaking, however,
-there are no bodies which absolutely conform to it. No substance is
-known whose parts are absolutely incapable of yielding one among
-another; but the amount by which they do yield is so excessively
-small as to be demonstrably incapable, in most cases, of having any
-influence on the results: and in those where it has such influence, an
-especial investigation of its amount can always be made. This gives
-rise to two subdivisions of the application of mechanical reasonings
-to solid masses. Those which refer to the action of forces on flexible
-or elastic, and on inflexible or rigid, bodies, comprehending under
-the latter all such whose resistance to flexure or fracture is so
-very great as to permit our adoption of the language and ideas of the
-extreme case without fear of material error.
-
-(238.) In like manner, when we reason respecting the action of forces
-on a fluid mass, all we have occasion to assume is, that its parts
-are freely moveable one among the other. If, besides this, we choose
-to regard a fluid as incompressible, and deduce conclusions on this
-supposition, they will hold good only so far as there may be found
-such fluids in nature. Now, in strictness, there are none such; but,
-practically speaking, in the greater number of cases their resistance
-to compression is so very great that the result of the reasoning so
-carried on is not sensibly vitiated; and, in the remaining cases,
-the same general principles enable us to enter on a special enquiry
-directed to this point: and hence the division of fluids, in mechanical
-language, into compressible and incompressible, the latter being only
-the extreme or limiting case of the former.
-
-(239.) As we propose here, however, only to consider what is the actual
-constitution of nature, we shall regard all bodies, as they really
-are, more or less flexible and yielding. We know for certain, that
-the space which any material body appears to occupy is not entirely
-filled by it; because there is none which by the application of a
-sufficient force may not be _compressed_ or forced into a smaller
-space, and which, either wholly, as in air or liquids, or in part, as
-in the greater number of solids, will not recover its former dimensions
-when the force is taken off. In the case of air, this condensation
-may be urged to almost any extent; and not only does a mass of air
-so condensed completely recover its original bulk, when the applied
-pressure is removed, but if that ordinary pressure under which it
-exists at the earth’s surface (and which arises from the weight of
-the atmosphere) be also removed by an air-pump, it will still further
-dilate itself without limit so far as we have yet been able to try
-it. Hence we are led to the conclusion that the particles of air are
-mutually elastic, and have a _tendency to recede from one another_,
-which can only be counteracted by _force_, and therefore is itself a
-force of the repulsive kind. Nevertheless, as air is heavy, and as
-gravitation is a universal property of matter, there is no doubt that
-this repulsive tendency must have a limit, and that there is a distance
-to which, if the particles of the air could be removed from each other,
-their mutual repulsion would cease, and an attraction take its place.
-This limit is probably attained at some very great height above the
-earth’s surface, beyond which, of course, its atmosphere cannot extend.
-
-(240.) What, however, we can only conclude by this or similar reasoning
-respecting air, we see distinctly in liquids. They are all, though
-in a small degree, compressible, and recover their former dimensions
-completely when the pressure is removed; but they cannot be dilated (by
-mechanical means), and have no tendency, while they remain liquids, to
-enlarge themselves beyond a certain limit, and therefore they assume a
-determinate _surface_ while at rest, and their parts actually resist
-further separation with a considerable force, thus giving rise to the
-phenomenon of the _cohesion of liquids_.
-
-(241.) Both in air and in liquids, however, the most perfect freedom
-of motion of the parts among each other subsists, which could hardly
-be the case if they were not separate and independent of each other.
-And from this, combined with the foregoing considerations, it has been
-concluded that they do not actually touch, but are kept asunder at
-determinate distances from each other, by the constant action of the
-two forces of attraction and repulsion, which are supposed to balance
-and counteract each other at the ordinary distances of the particles,
-but to prevail, the one, or the other, according as they are forcibly
-urged together or pulled asunder.
-
-(242.) In solids, however, the case is very different. The mutual free
-motion of their parts _inter se_ is powerfully impeded, and in some
-almost destroyed. In some, a slow and gradual change of figure may be
-produced to a great extent, by pressure or blows, as for instance in
-the metals, clay, butter, &c.; in others, fracture is the consequence
-of any attempt to change the figure by violence beyond a certain very
-small limit. In solids, then, it is evident, that the consideration of
-their intimate structure has a very great influence in modifying the
-general results of the action of such attractive and repulsive forces
-as may be assumed to account for the phenomena they present; yet the
-general facts that their parts _cohere_ with a certain energy, and that
-they resist displacement or intrusion on the part of other bodies,
-are sufficient to demonstrate at least the existence of such forces,
-whatever obscurity may subsist as to their mode of action.
-
-(243.) This division of bodies into airs, liquids, and solids, gives
-rise, then, to three distinct branches of mechanical science, in each
-of which the general principles of equilibrium and motion have their
-peculiar mode of application; viz. pneumatics, hydrostatics, and what
-might, without impropriety, be termed stereostatics.
-
-
-_Pneumatics._
-
-(244.) Pneumatics relates to the equilibrium or movements of aërial
-fluids under all circumstances of pressure, density, and elasticity.
-The weight of the air, and its pressure on all the bodies on the
-earth’s surface, were quite unknown to the ancients, and only first
-perceived by Galileo, on the occasion of a sucking-pump refusing to
-draw water above a certain height. Before his time it had always been
-supposed that water rose by suction in a pipe, in consequence of a
-certain natural _abhorrence of a vacuum_ or empty space, which obliged
-the water to enter by way of supplying the place of the air sucked out.
-But if any such abhorrence existed, and had the force of an _acting
-cause_, which could urge water a single foot into a pipe, there is no
-reason why the same principle should not carry it up two, three, or
-any number of feet; none why it should suddenly stop short at a certain
-height, and refuse to rise higher, however violent the suction might
-be, nay, even fall back, if purposely forced up too high.
-
-(245.) Galileo, however, at first contented himself with the
-conclusion, that the natural abhorrence of a vacuum was not strong
-enough to sustain the water more than about thirty-two feet above
-its level; and, although the true cause of the phenomenon at length
-occurred to him, in the pressure of the air on the general surface,
-it was not satisfactorily demonstrated till his pupil, Torricelli,
-conceived the happy idea of instituting an experiment on a small
-scale by the use of a much heavier liquid, mercury, instead of water,
-and, in place of sucking out the air from above, employing the much
-more effectual method of filling a long glass tube with mercury, and
-inverting it into a basin of the same metal. It was then at once seen,
-as by a _glaring instance_, that the maintenance of the mercury in the
-tube (which is nothing else than the common barometer) was the effect
-of a perfectly definite external cause, while its fluctuations from day
-to day, with the varying state of the atmosphere, strongly corroborated
-the notion of its being due to the pressure of the external air on the
-surface of the mercury in the reservoir.
-
-(246.) The discovery of Torricelli was, however, at first much
-misconceived, and even disputed, till the question was finally decided
-by appeal to a _crucial instance_, one of the first, if not the very
-first on record in physics, and for which we are indebted to the
-celebrated Pascal. His acuteness perceived that if the weight of the
-incumbent air be the direct cause of the elevation of the mercury,
-it must be measured by the amount of that elevation, and therefore
-that, by carrying a barometer up a high mountain, and so ascending
-into the atmosphere _above_ a large portion of the incumbent air, the
-pressure, as well as the length of the column sustained by it, must
-be diminished; while, on the other hand, if the phenomenon were due
-to the cause originally assigned, no difference could be expected to
-take place, whether the observation were made on a mountain or on the
-plain. Perhaps the decisive effect of the experiment which he caused
-to be instituted for the purpose, on the Puy de Dôme, a high mountain
-in Auvergne, while it convinced every one of the truth of Torricelli’s
-views, tended more powerfully than any thing which had previously been
-done in science to confirm, in the minds of men, that disposition to
-experimental verification which had scarcely yet taken full and secure
-root.
-
-(247.) Immediately on this discovery followed that of the air-pump,
-by Otto von Guericke of Magdeburgh, whose aim seems to have been to
-decide the question, whether a vacuum could or could not exist, by
-endeavouring to make one. The imperfection of his mechanism enabled
-him only to diminish the aërial contents of his receivers, not
-entirely to empty them; but the curious effects produced by even a
-partial exhaustion of air speedily excited attention, and induced our
-illustrious countryman, Robert Boyle, to the prosecution of those
-experiments which terminated in his hands, and in those of Hauksbee,
-Hooke, Mariotte, and others, in a satisfactory knowledge of the
-general law of the equilibrium of the air under the influence of
-greater or less pressures. These discoveries have since been extended
-to all the various descriptions of aërial fluids which chemistry has
-shown to exist, and to maintain their aëriform state under artificial
-pressure, and even to those which may be produced from liquids reduced
-to a state of vapour by heat, so long as they retain that state.
-
-(248.) The manner in which the observed law of equilibrium of an
-elastic fluid, like air, may be considered to originate in the mutual
-repulsion of its particles, has been investigated by Newton, and
-the actual statement of the law itself, as announced by Mariotte,
-“that the density of the air, or the quantity of it contained in the
-same space, is, _cæteris paribus_, proportional to the pressure it
-supports,” has recently been verified within very extensive limits by
-direct experiment, by a committee of the Royal Academy of Paris. This
-law contains the principle of solution of every dynamical question
-that can occur relative to the equilibrium of elastic fluids, and is
-therefore to be regarded as one of the highest _axioms_ in the science
-of pneumatics.
-
-
-_Hydrostatics._
-
-(249.) The principles of the equilibrium of liquids, understanding
-by this word such fluids as do not, though quite at liberty, attempt
-to dilate themselves beyond a certain point, are at once few and
-simple. The first steps towards a knowledge of them were made by
-Archimedes, who established the general fact, that a solid immersed in
-a liquid loses a portion of its weight equal to that of the liquid it
-displaces. It seems very astonishing, after this, that it should not
-have been at once concluded that the weight thus said to be _lost_ is
-only _counteracted_ by the upward pressure of the liquid, and that,
-therefore, a portion of any liquid, surrounded on all sides by a liquid
-of the same kind, does really exert its weight in keeping its place.
-Yet the prejudice that “liquids do not gravitate in their natural
-place” kept its ground, and was only dispelled with the mass of error
-and absurdity which the introduction of a rational and experimental
-philosophy by Galileo swept away.
-
-(250.) The hydrostatical law of _the equal pressure of liquids in all
-directions_, with its train of curious and important consequences, is
-an immediate conclusion from the perfect mobility of their parts among
-one another, in consequence of which each of them tends to recede from
-an excess of pressure on one side, and thus bears upon the rest, and
-distributes the pressure among its neighbours. In this form it was
-laid down by Newton, and has proved one of the most useful and fertile
-principles of physico-mathematical reasoning on the equilibrium of
-fluid masses, as affording a means of tracing the action of a force
-applied at any point of a liquid through its whole extent. It applies,
-too, without any modification, to expansible fluids as well as to
-liquids; and, in the applications of geometry to this subject, enables
-us to dispense with any minute and intricate enquiries as to the mode
-in which individual particles act on each other.
-
-(251.) In a practical point of view, this law is remarkable for the
-directness of its application to useful purposes. The immediate and
-perfect distribution of a pressure applied on any one part, however
-small, of a fluid surface through the whole mass, enables us to
-communicate _at one instant_ the same pressure to any number of such
-parts by merely increasing the surface of the fluid, which may be done
-by enlarging the containing vessel; and if the vessel be so constructed
-that a large portion of its surface shall be moveable together, the
-pressures on all the similar parts of this portion will be united into
-one consentient force, which may thus be increased to any extent we
-please. The hydraulic press, invented by Bramah, (or rather applied by
-him after a much more ancient inventor, Stevin,) is constructed on this
-principle. A small quantity of water is driven by sufficient pressure
-into a vessel _already full_, and provided with a moveable surface or
-piston of great size. Under such circumstances something must give way;
-the great surface of the piston accumulates the pressure on it to such
-an extent that nothing can resist its violence. Thus, trees are torn
-up by the roots; piles extracted from the earth; woollen and cotton
-goods compressed into the most portable dimensions; and even hay, for
-military service, reduced to such a state of coercion as to be easily
-packed on board transports.
-
-(252.) Liquids differ from aëriform fluids by their _cohesion_, which
-may be regarded as a kind of approach to a solid state, and was so
-regarded by Bacon (193.). Indeed, there can be little doubt that
-the solid, liquid, and aëriform states of bodies are merely stages
-in a progress of gradual transition from one extreme to the other;
-and that, however strongly marked the distinctions between them may
-appear, they will ultimately turn out to be separated by no sudden or
-violent line of demarcation, but shade into each other by insensible
-gradations. The late experiments of Baron Cagnard de la Tour may be
-regarded as a first step towards the full demonstration of this (199.).
-But the cohesion of liquids is not, like that of solids, so modified
-by their structure in other respects as to destroy the mobility of
-their parts one among another (unless in those cases of nearer approach
-to the solid state which obtain in viscid or gummy liquids). On the
-contrary, the two qualities co-exist, and give rise to a number of
-curious and intricate phenomena.
-
-(253.) One of the most remarkable of these is capillary attraction,
-or capillarity as it is sometimes called. Every body has remarked the
-adhesion of water to glass. The elevation of the general surface of
-the liquid where it is in contact with the containing vessel; the form
-of a drop suspended at the under side of a solid: these are instances
-of capillary attraction. If a small glass tube with a bore as fine as
-a hair be immersed in water, the water will be observed to rise in
-it to a certain height, and to assume a concave surface at its upper
-extremity. The attraction of the glass on the water, and the cohesion
-of the parts of the water to each other, are no doubt the joint causes
-of this curious effect; but the mode of action is at once obscure and
-complex; and although the researches of Laplace and Young have thrown
-great light on it, further investigation seems necessary before we can
-be said distinctly to understand it.
-
-(254.) As the capillarity and cohesion of the parts of liquids shows
-them to possess the power of mutual attraction, so their elasticity
-demonstrates that they also possess that of repulsion when forcibly
-brought nearer than their natural state. From the extremely small
-extent to which the compression of liquids can be carried by any force
-we can employ, compared with that of air, we must conclude that this
-repulsion is much more violent in the former than in the latter, but
-counteracted also by a more powerful force of attraction. So much more
-powerful, indeed, is the resistance of liquids to compression, that
-they were usually regarded as incompressible; an opinion corroborated
-by a celebrated experiment made at Florence, in which water was forced
-through the pores (as it was said) of a golden ball. More recent
-experiments by Canton, and since by Perkins, Oërsted, and others,
-have demonstrated however the contrary, and assigned the amount of
-compression.
-
-(255.) The consideration of the motions of fluids, whether liquid
-or expansible, is infinitely more complicated than that of their
-equilibrium. When their motions are slow, it is reasonable to suppose
-that the law of the equable distribution of pressure obtains; but in
-very rapid displacements of their parts one among the other, it is not
-easy to see how such an equable distribution can be accomplished, and
-some phenomena exist which seem to indicate a contrary conclusion.
-
-(256.) Independent of this, there are difficulties of an almost
-insuperable nature to the regular deductive application of the general
-principles of mechanics to this subject, which arise from the excessive
-intricacy of the pure mathematical enquiries to which its investigation
-leads. It was Newton who set the example of a first attempt to draw
-any conclusions respecting the motion of fluid masses by direct
-reasoning from dynamical principles, and thus laid the foundation of
-HYDRODYNAMICS; but it was not till the time of D’Alembert that the
-method of reducing any question respecting the motions of fluids under
-the action of forces to strict mathematical investigation could be said
-to be completely understood. But the cases even now in which this mode
-of treating such questions can be applied with full satisfaction are
-few in comparison of those in which the experimental method of enquiry
-as already observed (189.) is preferable. Such, for example, is that
-of the resistance of fluids to bodies moving through them; a knowledge
-of which is of great importance in naval architecture and in gunnery,
-where the resistance of the air acts to an enormous extent. Such,
-too, among the practical subjects which depend mainly on this branch
-of science, are the use of sails in navigation; the construction of
-windmills, and water-wheels; the transmission of water through pipes
-and channels; the construction of docks and harbours, &c.
-
-
-_Nature of Solids in general._
-
-(257.) The intimate constitution of solids is, in all probability, very
-complicated, and we cannot be said to know much of it. By some recent
-delicate experiments on the dimensions of wires violently strained, it
-has been shown that they are to a certain small extent capable of being
-dilated by tension, as they are also of being compressed by pressure,
-but within limits even narrower than those of liquids. Usually, when
-strained too far, they break, and refuse to re-unite; or, if compressed
-too forcibly, take a permanent contraction of dimension. Thus, wood
-may be indented by a blow, and metals rendered denser and heavier by
-hammering or rolling. There is a certain degree of confusion prevalent
-in ordinary language about the hardness, elasticity, and other similar
-qualities, of solids, which it may be well to remove. Hardness is that
-disposition of a solid which renders it difficult to displace its
-parts among themselves. Thus, steel is harder than iron; and diamond
-almost infinitely harder than any other substance in nature: but the
-compressibility of steel, or the extent to which it will yield to a
-given pressure and recover itself, is not much less than that of soft
-iron, and that of ice is very nearly the same with that of water.
-
-(258.) Again, we call Indian rubber a very elastic body, and so it is;
-but in a different sense from steel. Its parts admit of great mutual
-displacement without permanent dislocation; however distorted, it
-recovers its figure readily, but with a small force. Yet, if Indian
-rubber were to be enclosed in a space that it just filled, so as not to
-permit its parts to yield laterally, doubtless it would resist actual
-compression with great violence. Here, then, we have an instance
-of two kinds of elasticity in one substance; a feebler effort of
-recovery from distorted figure, and a more violent one from a state
-of altered dimension. Both, however, originate in the same causes,
-and are referable to the same principles; the former being in fact
-only a modified case of the latter, as the effort of a steel spring,
-when bent, to recover its former shape, is referable to the same
-forces which give to steel its hardness and strength to resist actual
-compression and fracture.
-
-(259.) The toughness of a solid, or that quality by which it will
-endure heavy blows without breaking, is again distinct from hardness
-though often confounded with it. It consists in a certain yielding of
-parts with a powerful general cohesion, and is compatible with various
-degrees of elasticity. Malleability is again another quality of solids,
-especially metals, quite distinct from toughness, and depends on their
-capability of being deprived of their figure without an effort to
-recover it and without fracture.
-
-(260.) Tenacity, again, is a property of solids more directly depending
-on the cohesion of their parts than toughness. It consists in their
-power of resisting separation by a strain steadily applied, while the
-quality of toughness is materially influenced by their disposition
-to communicate through their substance the jarring effect of a
-blow. Accordingly, the tenacity of a solid is a direct measure of
-the cohesive attraction of its parts, and is the best proof of the
-existence of such a power.
-
-
-_Crystallography._
-
-(261.) It cannot be supposed that these and many other tangible
-qualities, as they may be called, should subsist in solids without
-a corresponding mechanism in their internal structure. That they
-have such a mechanism, and that a very curious and intricate one,
-the phenomena of crystallography sufficiently show. This interesting
-and beautiful department of natural science is of comparatively very
-modern date. That many natural substances affected certain forms must
-have been known from the earliest times. Pliny appears to have been
-acquainted with this fact, at least in some instances, as he describes
-the forms of quartz and diamond. But till the time of Linnæus no
-material attention seems to have been bestowed on the subject. He,
-however, observed, and described with care, the crystalline forms
-of a variety of substances, and even regarded them as so definite a
-character of the solids which assumed them, that he supposed every
-particular form to be generated by a particular salt. Romé de l’Isle
-pursued the study of the crystalline forms of bodies yet farther. He
-first ascertained the important fact of the constancy of the angles
-at which their faces meet; and observing further that many of them
-appear in several different shapes, first conceived the idea that these
-shapes might be reducible to one, appropriated in a peculiar manner to
-each _substance_, and modified by strict geometrical laws. Bergmann,
-reasoning on a fact imparted to him by his pupil Gahn, made a yet
-greater step, and showed how at least one species of crystal might
-be built up of thin laminæ ranged in a certain order, and following
-certain rules of superposition. He failed, however, in deducing just
-and general conclusions from this remark, which, correctly viewed, is
-the foundation of the most important law of crystallography, that which
-connects the primitive form with other forms capable of being exhibited
-by the same substance, by a certain fixed relation. An idea may be
-formed of what is meant by this sort of connection of one form with
-another, by considering a pointed pyramid built up of cubic stones,
-disposed in layers, each of which separately is a square plate of the
-thickness of a single stone. These layers, laid horizontally one on the
-other, and decreasing regularly in size from the bottom to the top,
-produce a pyramidal form with a rough or channeled surface; and if the
-layers are so extremely thin that the channels cease to be visible to
-the eye, the pyramid will seem smooth and perfect.
-
-(262.) Very shortly after this, and without knowledge of what had been
-done by Gahn and Bergmann, the Abbé Haüy, instructed by the accidental
-fracture of a fine group of crystals, made the remark noticed already
-(in 67.), and reasoning on it with more caution and success, and
-pursuing it into all its detail, developed the general laws which
-regulate the superposition of the layers of particles of which he
-supposes all crystals to be built up, and which enable us, from knowing
-their primitive forms, to discover, previous to trial, what other
-forms they are capable of assuming; and which, according to this idea,
-are called derivative or secondary forms. Mohs and others have since
-imagined processes and systems by which the derivation of forms from
-each other is facilitated, and have corrected some errors of over-hasty
-generalization into which their predecessors had fallen, as well as
-advanced, by an extraordinary diligence of research, our knowledge of
-the forms which the various substances which occur in nature and art
-actually do assume.
-
-(263.) In what manner a variety in point of external form may originate
-in a variety of figures in the ultimate particles of which a solid
-is composed, may very readily be imagined by considering what would
-happen if the bricks of which an edifice is constructed had all a
-certain _leaning_ or bias in one direction out of the perpendicular.
-Suppose every brick, for instance, when laid flat on its face, with
-its longer edges north and south, had its eastern and western faces
-upright, but its northern and southern ones leaning southwards at a
-certain inclination the same for each brick; a house built of such
-bricks would lean the same way, if the bricks fitted well together.
-If, _besides this_, the eastern and western faces of the bricks,
-instead of being truly upright, had an inclination eastward, the house
-would have a similar one, and all its four corners, instead of being
-upright, would lean to the south-east. Suppose, instead of a house, a
-pyramid were built of such oblique bricks, with the sides of its base
-directed to the four points of the compass; then its point, instead
-of being situated vertically over the centre of its base, would stand
-perpendicularly over some point to the south-east of that centre, and
-the pyramid itself would have its sides facing the south and the east,
-more highly inclined to the horizon than those towards the north and
-west.
-
-(264.) Whatever conception we may form of the manner in which the
-particles of a crystal cohere and form masses, it is next to impossible
-to divest ourselves of the idea of a determinate figure common to them
-all. Any other supposition, indeed, would be incompatible with that
-exact similarity in all other respects which the phenomena of chemistry
-may be considered as having demonstrated. However, it must be borne in
-mind that this idea, plausible as it may appear, is yet in some degree
-hypothetical, and that the laws of crystallography, as determined from
-inductive observation, are quite independent of any supposition of the
-kind, or even of the existence of such things as ultimate particles or
-atoms at all.
-
-(265.) Still, that peculiar internal constitution of solid bodies,
-whatever it be, which is indicated by the assumption of determinate
-figures, by their splitting easier in some directions than in others,
-and by their presenting glittering plane surfaces when broken into
-fragments, cannot but have an important influence on all their
-relations to external agents, as well as to their internal movements
-and the mutual actions of their parts on one another. Accordingly, the
-division of bodies into crystallized and uncrystallized, or imperfectly
-crystallized, is one of the most universal importance; and almost all
-the phenomena produced by those more intimate natural causes which
-act within small limits, and as it were on the immediate mechanism
-of solid substances, are remarkably modified by their crystalline
-structure. Thus, in transparent solids, the course taken by the rays
-of light, in traversing them, as well as the properties impressed upon
-them in so doing, are intimately connected with this structure. The
-recent experiments of M. Savart, too, have proved that this is also the
-case with their power of resistance to external force, on which depends
-their elasticity. Crystallized substances, according to the results of
-these experiments, resist compression with different degrees of elastic
-force, according to the direction in which it is attempted to compress
-them; and all the phenomena dependent on their elasticity are affected
-by this cause, especially those which relate to their vibratory
-movements and their conveyance of sound.
-
-(266.) There can be little doubt that modifications, similarly
-depending on the internal structure of crystals, will be traced through
-every department of physics. In that interesting one which relates
-to the action of heat in expanding the dimensions of substances, a
-beginning has already been made by Professor Mitscherlich. It had long
-been known that all substances are dilated by heat, and no exception
-to this law has been found, so long as we regard the _bulk_ of the
-heated body. Thus, an iron rod when hot is both longer and thicker than
-when cold; and the difference of dimension, though but trifling in
-itself, is yet capable of being made sensible, and is of considerable
-consequence in engineering. Thus, too, the quicksilver in a common
-thermometer occupies a larger space when hot than when cold; and being
-confined by the glass ball, (which also expands, but _not so much in
-proportion_,) it is forced to rise in the tube. These and similar facts
-had long been known; and accurate measures of the total amount of
-dilatation of a variety of different bodies, under similar accessions
-of heat, had been obtained and registered in tables. But no one had
-suspected the important fact, that this expansion in crystallized
-bodies takes place under totally different circumstances from what
-obtains in uncrystallized ones. M. Mitscherlich has lately shown that
-such substances expand differently in different directions, and has
-even produced a case in which expansion in one direction is actually
-accompanied with contraction in another. This step, the most important
-beyond a doubt which has yet been made in pyrometry, can however only
-be regarded as the first in a series of researches which will occupy
-the next generation, and which promises to afford an abundant harvest
-of new facts, as well as the elucidation of some of the most obscure
-and interesting points in the doctrine of heat.
-
-(267.) From what has been said, it is clear that if we look upon solid
-bodies as collections of particles or atoms, held together and kept
-in their places by the perpetual action of attractive and repulsive
-forces, we cannot suppose these forces, at least in crystallized
-substances, to act alike in all directions. Hence arises the conception
-of _polarity_, of which we see an instance, on a great scale, in the
-magnetic needle, but which, under modified forms, there is nothing to
-prevent us from conceiving to act among the ultimate atoms of solid
-or even fluid bodies, and to produce all the phenomena which they
-exhibit in their crystallized state, either when acting on each other,
-or on light, heat, &c. It is not difficult, if we give the reins to
-imagination, to conceive how attractive and repulsive atoms, bound
-together by some unknown tie, may form little machines or compound
-particles, which shall have many of the properties which we refer to
-polarity; and accordingly many ingenious suppositions have been made to
-that effect: but in the actual state of science it is certainly safest
-to wave these hypotheses, without however absolutely rejecting them,
-and regard the _polarity of matter_ as one of the ultimate phenomena to
-which the analysis of nature leads us, and of which it is our business
-fully to investigate the laws, before we endeavour to ascertain its
-causes, or trace the mechanism by which it is produced.
-
-(268.) The mutual attractions and repulsions of the particles of
-matter, then, and their polarity, whether regarded as an original or a
-derivative property, are the forces which, acting with great energy,
-and within very confined limits, we must look to as the principles on
-which the intimate constitution of all bodies and many of their mutual
-actions depend. These are what are understood by the general term of
-_molecular forces_. Molecular attraction has been attempted to be
-confounded by some with the general attraction of gravity, which all
-matter exerts on all other matter; but this idea is refuted by the
-plainest facts.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. II.
-
-OF THE COMMUNICATION OF MOTION THROUGH BODIES.--OF SOUND AND LIGHT.
-
-
-(269.) The propagation of motion through all substances, whether of a
-single impulse, as a blow or thrust, or of one frequently and regularly
-repeated, such as a jarring or vibratory movement, depends wholly on
-these molecular forces; and it is on such propagation that sound and
-very probably light depend. To conceive the manner in which a motion
-may be conveyed from one part of a substance to another, whether solid
-or fluid, we may attend to what takes place when a wave is made to
-run along a stretched string, or the surface of still water. Every
-part of the string, or water, is in succession moved from its place,
-and agitated with a motion similar to that of the original impulse,
-leaving its place and returning to it, and when one part ceases to move
-the next receives as it were the impression, and forwards it onward.
-This may seem a slow and circuitous process in description; but when
-sound, for example, is conveyed through the air, we are to consider,
-1st, that the air, the substance actually in motion, is extremely light
-and acted upon by a very powerful elasticity, so that the force which
-propagates the motion, or by which the particles adjacent act on, and
-urge forward, each other, is very great, compared with the quantity of
-materials set in motion by it: and the same is true, even in a greater
-degree, in liquids and solids; for in these the elastic forces are even
-greater, in proportion to the weight, than in air.
-
-(270.) A general notion of the mode in which sounds are conveyed
-through the air was not altogether deficient among the ancients; but
-it is to Newton that we owe the first attempt to analyze the process,
-and show correctly what takes place in the communication of motion
-from particle to particle. Reasoning on the properties of the air as
-an elastic body, he showed the effect of an impulse on any portion of
-it to consist in a condensation of the air immediately adjacent in the
-direction of the impulse, which then, re-acting by its spring, drives
-back the portion which had advanced to its original place, and at the
-same time urges forward the portion before it, in the direction of the
-impulse, so that every particle alternately advances and retreats.
-But, in pursuing this idea into its details, Newton fell into some
-errors which were pointed out by Cramer, though their origin was not
-traced, nor the reasoning corrected, till the subject was resumed by
-Lagrange and Euler; nor is this any impeachment of the penetration of
-our immortal countryman. The mathematical theory of the propagation
-of sound, and of vibratory and undulatory motions in general, is
-one of the utmost intricacy; and, in spite of every exertion on the
-part of the most expert geometers, continues to this day to give
-continual occasion for fresh researches; while phenomena are constantly
-presenting themselves, which show how far we are from being able to
-deduce all the particulars, even of cases comparatively simple, by any
-direct reasoning from first principles.
-
-(271.) Whenever an impulse of any kind is conveyed by the air, to our
-ears, it produces the impression of sound; but when such an impulse
-is regularly and uniformly repeated in extremely rapid succession, it
-gives us that of a musical note, the pitch of the note depending on
-the rapidity of the succession (see art. 153.). The sense of harmony,
-too, depends on the periodical recurrence of coincident impulses on the
-ear, and affords, perhaps, the only instance of a sensation for whose
-pleasing impression a distinct and intelligible reason can be assigned.
-
-(272.) Acoustics, then, or the science of sound, is a very considerable
-branch of physics, and one which has been cultivated from the earliest
-ages. Even Pythagoras and Aristotle were not ignorant of the general
-mode of its transmission through the air, and of the nature of harmony;
-but as a branch of science, independent of its delightful application
-in the art of music, it could be hardly said to exist, till its nature
-and laws became a matter of experimental enquiry to Bacon and Galileo,
-Mersenne and Wallis; and of mathematical investigation to Newton, and
-his illustrious successors, Lagrange and Euler. From that time its
-progress, as a branch both of mathematical and experimental science,
-has been constant and accelerated. A curious and beautiful method of
-observation, due to Chladni, consists in the happy device of strewing
-sand over the surfaces of bodies in a state of sonorous vibration,
-and marking the figures it assumes. This has made their motions
-susceptible of ocular examination, and has been lately much improved
-on, and varied in its application, by M. Savart, to whom we also owe a
-succession of instructive researches on every point connected with the
-subject of sound, which may rank among the finest specimens of modern
-experimental enquiry. But the subject is far from being exhausted; and,
-indeed, there are few branches of physics which promise at once so much
-amusing interest, and such important consequences, in its bearings on
-other subjects, and especially, through the medium of strong analogies,
-on that of light.
-
-
-_Light and Vision._
-
-(273.) The nature of light has always been involved in considerable
-doubt and mystery. The ancients could scarcely be said to have any
-opinion on the subject, unless, indeed, it could be considered such
-to affirm that distant bodies could not be put into communication
-without an intermedium; and that, therefore, there must be _something_
-between the eye and the thing seen. What that something is, however,
-they could only form crude and vague conjectures. One supposed that
-the eyes themselves emit rays or emanations of some unknown kind, by
-which distant objects are as it were felt; a singularly unfortunate
-idea, since it gives no reason why objects should not be equally
-well seen in the dark--no account, in short, of the part performed
-by _light_ in vision. Others imagined that all visible objects are
-constantly throwing out from them, in all directions, some sort of
-resemblances or spectral forms of themselves, which, when received by
-the eyes, produce an impression of the objects. Vague and clumsy as
-this hypothesis obviously is, it assigns to the object a power, and to
-light a diffusive propagation in all directions, which are, the one and
-the other, independent of our eyes, and therefore goes to separate the
-phenomena of _light_ from those of _vision_.
-
-(274.) The hypothesis of Newton is a refinement and improvement on
-this idea. Instead of spectra or resemblances, he supposes luminous
-objects actually to dart out from them in all directions, particles,
-of inconceivable minuteness (as indeed they must be, having such
-an enormous velocity (see 17.), not to dash in pieces every thing
-they strike upon). These particles he supposes to be acted upon by
-attractive and repulsive forces, residing in all material bodies, the
-latter extending to some very small distance beyond their surfaces; and
-by the action of these forces to be turned aside from their natural
-straight-lined course, without ever coming in actual contact with the
-particles themselves of the bodies on which they fall, but either being
-turned back and _reflected_ by the repulsive forces before they reach
-them, or penetrating between their intervals, as a bird may be supposed
-to fly through the branches of a forest, and undergoing all their
-actions, to take at quitting them a direction finally determined by
-the position of the surface at which they emerge with respect to their
-course.
-
-(275.) This hypothesis, which was discussed and reasoned upon by Newton
-in a manner worthy of himself, affords, by the application of the
-same dynamical laws which he had applied with so much success to the
-explanation of the planetary motions, not merely a plausible, but a
-perfectly reasonable and fair explanation of all the _usual_ phenomena
-of light known in his time. His own beautiful discoveries, too, of
-the different refrangibilities of the differently coloured rays,
-were perfectly well represented in this theory, by simply admitting
-a difference of velocity in the particles, which produce in the eye
-the sensations of different colours. And had the properties of light
-remained confined to these, there would have been no occasion to have
-resorted to any other mode of conceiving it.
-
-(276.) A very different hypothesis had, however, been suggested about
-the same period by Huyghens, who supposed light to be produced in the
-same manner with sound, by the communication of a vibratory motion
-from the luminous body to a highly elastic fluid, which he imagined
-as filling all space, and as being less condensed within the limits
-of space occupied by matter, and that to a greater or less extent,
-according to the nature of the occupying substance. Thus, in place of
-any thing actually thrown off, he substituted waves, or vibrations,
-propagated in all directions from luminous bodies, through this medium,
-or ether, as he called it. Huyghens, being himself a consummate
-mathematician, was enabled to trace many of the consequences of this
-hypothesis, and to show that the ordinary laws of reflection and
-refraction were represented or accounted for by it, as well as by
-Newton’s. But the hypothesis of Huyghens has not been fully successful
-in accounting for what may be considered the chief of all optical
-facts, the production of colours in the ordinary refraction of
-light by a prism, of which the theory of Newton gives a complete and
-elegant explanation; and the discovery of which by him marks one of
-the greatest epochs in the annals of experimental science. This, which
-has been often urged in objection to it, remains still, if not quite
-unanswered, at least only imperfectly removed.
-
-(277.) Other phenomena, however, were not wanting to afford a further
-trial of the _explanatory powers_ of either hypothesis. The diffraction
-or inflection of light, discovered by Grimaldi, a Jesuit of Bologna,
-seemed to indicate that the rays of light were turned aside from their
-straight course by merely passing near bodies of every description.
-These phenomena, which are very curious and beautiful, were minutely
-examined by Newton, and referred by him to the action of repulsive
-forces extending to a sensible distance from the surfaces of bodies;
-and his explanation, so far as the facts known to him are concerned,
-appears as satisfactory as could reasonably be then expected; and much
-more so than any thing which could at that time be produced on the side
-of the hypothesis of Huyghens, which, in fact, seemed incapable of
-giving any account whatever of them.
-
-(278.) Another class of delicate and splendid optical phenomena, which
-had begun to attract attention somewhat previous to Newton’s time,
-seemed to leave both hypotheses equally at a loss. These were the
-colours exhibited by very thin films, either of a liquid (such as a
-soap-bubble), or of air, as when two glasses are laid together with
-only air between them. These colours were examined by Newton with a
-minuteness and care altogether unexampled in experimental philosophy
-at that time, and with which few researches undertaken since will bear
-to stand in competition. Their result was a theory of a very singular
-nature, which he grounded on an hypothesis of what he termed _fits of
-easy transmission and reflection_; and which supposed each ray of light
-to pass in its progress periodically through a succession of states
-such as would alternately dispose it to penetrate or be reflected back
-from the surface of a body on which it might fall. The simplest way
-in which the reader may conceive this hypothesis, is to regard every
-particle of light as a sort of little magnet revolving rapidly about
-its own centre while it advances in its course, and thus alternately
-presenting its attractive and repulsive pole, so that when it arrives
-at the surface of a body with its repulsive pole foremost, it is
-repelled and reflected; and when the contrary, attracted, so as to
-enter the surface. Newton, however, very cautiously avoided announcing
-his theory in this or any similar form, confining himself entirely to
-general language. In consequence, it has been confidently asserted
-by all his followers, that the doctrine of fits of easy reflection
-and transmission, as laid down by him, is substantially nothing more
-than a statement of facts. Were it so, it is clear that any other
-theory which should offer a just account of the same phenomena must
-ultimately involve and coincide with that of Newton. But this, as we
-shall presently see, is not the case; and this instance ought to serve
-to make us extremely cautious how we employ, in stating physical laws
-derived from experiment, language which involves any thing in the
-slightest degree theoretical, if we would present the laws themselves
-in a form which no future research shall modify or subvert.
-
-(279.) A third class of optical phenomena, which were likewise
-discovered while Newton was yet engaged in his optical researches, was
-that exhibited by doubly refracting crystals. In what the phenomenon of
-double refraction consists, we have already had occasion to explain.
-The fact itself was first noticed by Erasmus Bartolin in the crystal
-called Iceland spar; and was studied with attention by Huyghens, who
-ascertained its laws, and referred it with remarkable ingenuity and
-success to his theory of light, by the additional hypothesis of such
-a constitution of his ethereal medium within the crystal as should
-enable it to convey an impulse faster in one direction than another:
-as if, for example’s sake, we should suppose a sound conveyed through
-the air with different degrees of rapidity in a vertical and horizontal
-direction.
-
-(280.) Some remarkable facts accompanying the double refraction
-produced by Iceland spar, which Bartolin, Huyghens, and Newton, had
-observed, led the latter to conceive the singular idea that a ray of
-light after its emergence from such a crystal acquires _sides_, that
-is to say, distinct relations to surrounding space, which it carries
-with it through its whole subsequent course, and which give rise to all
-those curious and complicated phenomena which are now known under the
-name of the _polarization of light_. These results, however, appeared
-so extraordinary, and offered so little handle for further enquiry,
-that their examination dropped, as if by common consent; Newton himself
-resting content with urging strongly the apparent incompatibility of
-these properties with the Huyghenian doctrine, but without making any
-attempt to explain them by his own.
-
-(281.) From the period of Newton’s optical discoveries to the
-commencement of the present century, no great accession to our
-knowledge of the nature of light was made, if we except one, which,
-from its invaluable practical application, must ever hold a prominent
-place in the annals both of art and science: we mean, the discovery
-of the principle of the achromatic telescope, which originated in a
-discussion between the celebrated geometer Euler, Klingenstierna, an
-eminent Swedish philosopher, and our own countryman, the admirable
-optician Dollond, on the occasion of certain abstract theoretical
-investigations of the former, which led him to speculate on its
-_possibility_, and which ultimately terminated in its complete and
-happy _execution_ by the latter; a memorable case in science, though
-not a singular one, where the speculative geometer in his chamber,
-apart from the world, and existing among abstractions, has originated
-views of the noblest practical application.[49]
-
-(282.) The explanation which our knowledge of optical laws affords of
-the mechanism of the eye, and the process by which vision is performed,
-is as complete and satisfactory as that of hearing by the propagation
-of motion through the air. The camera obscura, invented by Baptista
-Porta in 1560, gave the first idea how the actual images of external
-objects might be conveyed into the eye, but it was not till after a
-considerable interval that Kepler, the immortal discoverer of those
-great laws which regulate the periods and motions of the planets,
-pointed out distinctly the offices performed by the several parts
-of the eye in the act of vision. From this to the invention of the
-telescope and microscope there would seem but a small step, but it is
-to accident rather than design that it is due; and its re-invention
-by Galileo, on a mere description of its effects, may serve, among
-a thousand similar instances, to show that inestimable practical
-applications lie open to us, if we can only once bring ourselves
-to conceive their possibility, a lesson which the invention of the
-achromatic telescope itself, as we have above related it, not less
-strongly exemplifies.
-
-(283.) The little instrument with which Galileo’s splendid discoveries
-were made was hardly superior in power to an ordinary finder of the
-present day; but it was rapidly improved on, and in the hands of
-Huyghens attained to gigantic dimensions and very great power. It was
-to obviate the necessity of the enormous length required for these
-telescopes, and yet secure the same power, that Gregory and Newton
-devised the reflecting telescope, which has since become a much
-more powerful instrument than its original inventors probably ever
-contemplated.
-
-(284.) The telescope, as it exists at present, with the improvements
-in its structure and execution which modern artists have effected, must
-assuredly be ranked among the highest and most refined productions of
-human art; that in which man has been able to approximate most closely
-to the workmanship of nature, and which has conferred upon him, if
-not another sense, at least an exaltation of one already possessed
-by him that merits almost to be regarded as a new one. Nor does it
-appear yet to have reached its ultimate perfection, to which indeed
-it is difficult to assign any bounds, when we take into consideration
-the wonderful progress which workmanship of every kind is making,
-and the delicacy, far superior to that of former times, with which
-materials may now be wrought, as well as the ingenious inventions and
-combinations which every year is bringing forth for accomplishing the
-same ends by means hitherto unattempted.[50]
-
-(285.) After a long torpor, the knowledge of the properties of light
-began to make fresh progress about the end of the last century,
-advancing with an accelerated rapidity, which has continued unabated
-to the present time. The example was set by our late admirable and
-lamented countryman, Dr. Wollaston, who re-examined and verified
-the laws of double refraction in Iceland spar announced by Huyghens.
-Attention being thus drawn to the subject, the geometry of Laplace
-soon found a means of explaining at least one portion of the mystery
-of this singular phenomenon, by the Newtonian theory of light, applied
-under certain supposed conditions; and the reasoning which led him to
-the result (at that time quite unexpected), may justly be regarded as
-one of his happiest efforts. The prosecution of the subject, which had
-now acquired a high degree of interest, was encouraged by the offer
-of a prize on the part of the French Academy of Sciences; and it was
-in a memoir which received this honourable reward on that occasion,
-in 1810, that Malus, a retired officer of engineers in the French
-army, announced the great discovery of the _polarization of light_ by
-ordinary reflection at the surface of a transparent body.
-
-(286.) Malus found that when a beam of light is reflected from the
-surface of such a body at a certain angle, it acquires precisely the
-same singular property which is impressed upon it in the act of double
-refraction, and which Newton had before expressed by saying that it
-possessed _sides_. This was the first circumstance which pointed out a
-connection between that hitherto mysterious phenomenon and any of the
-ordinary modifications of light; and it proved ultimately the means of
-bringing the whole within the limits, if not of a complete explanation,
-at least of a highly plausible theoretical representation. So true is,
-in science, the remark of Bacon, that no natural phenomenon can be
-adequately studied _in itself alone_, but, to be understood, must be
-considered _as it stands connected with all nature_.
-
-(287.) The new class of phenomena thus disclosed were immediately
-studied with diligence and success, both abroad by Malus and Arago, and
-at home by our countryman Dr. Brewster, and their laws investigated
-with a care proportioned to their importance; when another and
-apparently still more extraordinary class of phenomena presented
-itself in the production of the most vivid and beautiful colours
-(every way resembling those observed by Newton in thin films of air
-or liquids, only infinitely more developed and striking,) in certain
-transparent crystallized substances, when divided into flat plates in
-particular directions, and exposed in a beam of polarized light. The
-attentive examination of these colours by Wollaston, Biot, and Arago,
-but more especially by Brewster, speedily led to the disclosure of a
-series of optical phenomena so various, so brilliant, and evidently
-so closely connected with the most important points relating to the
-intimate structure of crystallized bodies, as to excite the highest
-interest,--that sort of interest which is raised when we feel we are
-on the eve of some extraordinary discovery, and expect every moment
-that some leading fact will turn up, which will throw light on all that
-appears obscure, and reduce into order all that seems anomalous.
-
-(288.) This expectation was not disappointed. So long before the time
-we are speaking of as the first year of the present century, our
-illustrious countryman, the late Dr. Thomas Young, had established a
-principle in optics, which, regarded as a physical law, has hardly its
-equal for beauty, simplicity, and extent of application, in the whole
-circle of science. Considering the manner in which the vibrations of
-two musical sounds arriving at once at the ear affect the sense with
-an impression of sound or silence according as they conspire or oppose
-each other’s effects, he was led to the idea that the same ought to
-hold good with light as with sound, if the theory which makes light
-analogous to sound be the true one; and that, therefore, two rays of
-light, setting off from the same origin, at the same instant, and
-arriving at the same place by different routes, ought to strengthen
-or wholly or partially destroy each other’s effects according to
-the difference in length of the routes described by them. That two
-lights should in any circumstances combine to produce darkness may
-be considered strange, but is _literally true_; and it had even been
-noticed long ago as a singular and unaccountable fact by Grimaldi, in
-his experiments on the inflection of light. The experimental means by
-which Dr. Young confirmed this principle, which is known in optics
-by the name of the _interference_ of the rays of light, were as
-simple and satisfactory as the principle itself is beautiful; but the
-verifications of it, drawn from the explanation it affords of phenomena
-apparently the most remote, are still more so. Newton’s colours of thin
-films were the first phenomena to which its author applied it with full
-success. Its next remarkable application was to those of diffraction,
-of which, in the hands of M. Fresnel, a late eminent French geometer,
-it also furnished a complete explanation, and that, too, in cases to
-which Newton’s hypothesis could not apparently be made to apply, and
-through a complication of circumstances which might afford a very
-severe test of any hypothesis.
-
-(289.) A simple and beautiful experiment on the interferences of
-polarized light due to Fresnel and Arago enabled them to bring Dr.
-Young’s law to bear on the colours produced by crystallized plates in a
-polarized beam, and by so doing afforded a key to all the intricacies
-of these magnificent but complex phenomena. Nothing now was wanting to
-a rational theory of double refraction but to frame an hypothesis of
-some mode in which light might be conceived to be propagated through
-the elastic medium supposed to convey it in such a way as not to be
-contradictory to any of the facts, nor to the general laws of dynamics.
-This essential idea, without which every thing that had been before
-done would have been incomplete, was also furnished by Dr. Young, who,
-with a sagacity which would have done honour to Newton himself, had
-declared, that to accommodate the doctrine of Huyghens to the phenomena
-of polarized light it is necessary to conceive the mode of propagation
-of a luminous impulse through the ether, differently from that of a
-sonorous one through the air. In the latter, the particles of the air
-_advance_ and _recede_; in the former, those of the ether must be
-supposed to _tremble laterally_.
-
-(290.) Taking this as the groundwork of his reasoning, Fresnel
-succeeded in erecting on it a theory of polarization and double
-refraction, so happy in its adaptation to facts, and in the coincidence
-with experience of results deduced from it by the most intricate
-analysis, that it is difficult to conceive it unfounded. If it be
-so, it is at least the most curiously artificial system that science
-has yet witnessed; and whether it be so or not, so long as it serves
-to group together in one comprehensive point of view a mass of facts
-almost infinite in number and variety, to reason from one to another,
-and to establish analogies and relations between them; on whatever
-hypothesis it may be founded, or whatever arbitrary assumptions it
-may make respecting structures and modes of action, it can never be
-regarded as other than a most real and important accession to our
-knowledge.
-
-(291.) Still, it is by no means impossible that the Newtonian theory of
-light, if cultivated with equal diligence with the Huyghenian, might
-lead to an equally plausible explanation of phenomena now regarded
-as beyond its reach. M. Biot is the author of the hypothesis we have
-already mentioned of a rotatory motion of the particles of light about
-their axes. He has employed it only for a very limited purpose; but
-it might doubtless be carried much farther; and by admitting only the
-regular emission of the luminous particles at equal intervals of time,
-and in similar states of motion from the shining body, which does not
-seem a very forced supposition, all the phenomena of interference at
-least would be readily enough explained without the admission of an
-ether.
-
-(292.) The optical examination of crystallized substances affords
-one among many fine examples of the elucidation which every branch
-of science is capable of affording to every other. The indefatigable
-researches of Dr. Brewster and others have shown that the phenomena
-exhibited by polarized light in its transmission through crystals
-afford a certain indication of the most important points relating to
-the structure of the crystals themselves, and thus become most valuable
-characters by which to recognise their internal constitution. It was
-Newton who first showed of what importance as a physical character,--as
-the indication of other properties,--the action of a body on light
-might become; but the characters afforded by the use of polarized light
-as an instrument of experimental enquiry are so marked and intimate,
-that they may almost be said to have furnished us with a kind of
-intellectual sense, by which we are enabled to scrutinize the internal
-arrangement of those wonderful structures which Nature builds up by
-her refined and invisible architecture, with a delicacy eluding our
-conception, yet with a symmetry and beauty which we are never weary
-of admiring. In this point of view the science of optics has rendered
-to mineralogy and crystallography services not less important than to
-astronomy by the invention of the telescope, or to natural history by
-that of the microscope; while the relations which have been discovered
-to exist between the optical properties of bodies and their crystalline
-forms, and even their chemical habitudes, have afforded numerous
-and beautiful instances of general laws concluded from laborious and
-painful induction, and curiously exemplifying the simplicity of nature
-as it emerges slowly from an entangled mass of particulars in which, at
-first, neither order nor connection can be traced.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. III.
-
-OF COSMICAL PHENOMENA.
-
-
-_Astronomy and Celestial Mechanics._
-
-(293.) Astronomy, as has been observed in the former part of this
-discourse, as a science of observation, had made considerable progress
-among the ancients: indeed, it was the only branch of physical science
-which could be regarded as having been cultivated by them with any
-degree of assiduity or real success. The Chaldean and Egyptian records
-had furnished materials from which the motions of the sun and moon
-could be calculated with sufficient exactness for the prediction of
-eclipses; and some remarkable cycles, or periods of years in which
-the lunar eclipses return in very nearly the same order, had been
-ascertained by observation. Considering the extreme imperfection of
-their means of measuring time and space, this was, perhaps, as much
-as could have been expected at that early period, and it was followed
-up for a while in a philosophical spirit of just speculation, which,
-if continued, could hardly have failed to lead to sound and important
-conclusions.
-
-(294.) Unfortunately, however, the philosophy of Aristotle laid it
-down as a principle, that the celestial motions were regulated by laws
-proper to themselves, and bearing no affinity to those which prevail
-on earth. By thus drawing a broad and impassable line of separation
-between celestial and terrestrial mechanics, it placed the former
-altogether out of the pale of experimental research, while it at the
-same time impeded the progress of the latter by the assumption of
-principles respecting natural and unnatural motions, hastily adopted
-from the most superficial and cursory remark, undeserving even the
-name of observation. Astronomy, therefore, continued for ages a
-science of mere record, in which theory had no part, except in so
-far as it attempted to conciliate the inequalities of the celestial
-motions with that assumed law of uniform circular revolution which
-was alone considered consistent with the perfection of the heavenly
-mechanism. Hence arose an unwieldy, if not self-contradictory, mass
-of hypothetical motions of sun, moon, and planets, in circles, whose
-centres were carried round in other circles, and these again in others
-without end,--“cycle on epicycle, orb on orb,”--till at length, as
-observation grew more exact, and fresh epicycles were continually
-added, the absurdity of so cumbrous a mechanism became too palpable to
-be borne. Doubts were expressed, to which the sarcasm of a monarch[51]
-gave a currency they might not have obtained in a period when men
-scarcely dared trust themselves to think; and at length Copernicus,
-promulgating his own, or reviving the Pythagorean doctrine, which
-places the sun in the centre of our system, gave to astronomy a
-simplicity which, contrasted with the complication of the preceding
-views, at once commanded assent.
-
-(295.) An elegant writer[52], whom we have before had occasion to
-quote, has briefly and neatly accounted for the confused notions which
-so long prevailed respecting the constitution of our system, and the
-difficulty experienced in acquiring a true notion of the disposition
-of its parts. “We see it,” he observes, “not in _plan_, but in
-_section_.” The reason of this is, that our point of observation lies
-in its general plane, but the notion we aim at forming of it is not
-that of its section, but of its plan. This is as if we should attempt
-to read a book, or make out the countries on a map, with the eye on a
-level with the paper. We can only judge directly of the distances of
-objects by their sizes, or rather of their change of distance by their
-change of size; neither have we any means of ascertaining, otherwise
-than indirectly, even their positions, one among the other, from their
-apparent places as seen by us. Now, the variations in apparent size
-of the sun and moon are too small to admit of exact measure without
-the use of the telescope, and the bodies of the planets cannot even be
-distinguished as having any distinct size with the naked eye.
-
-(296.) The Copernican system once admitted, however, this difficulty
-of conception, at least, is effectually got over, and it becomes
-a mere problem of geometry and calculation to determine, from the
-observed places of a planet, its real orbit about the sun, and the
-other circumstances of its motion. This Kepler accomplished for the
-orbit of Mars, which he ascertained to be an ellipse having the sun
-in one of its foci; and the same law, being extended by inductive
-analogy to all the planets, was found to be verified in the case of
-each. This with the other remarkable laws which are usually cited in
-physical astronomy by the name of Kepler’s laws, constitute undoubtedly
-the most important and beautiful system of geometrical relations which
-have ever been discovered by a mere inductive process, independent of
-any consideration of a theoretical kind. They comprise within them a
-compendium of the motions of all the planets, and enable us to assign
-their places in their orbits at any instant of time past or to come
-(disregarding their mutual perturbations), provided certain purely
-geometrical problems can be numerically resolved.
-
-(297.) It was not, however, till long after Kepler’s time that the
-real importance of these laws could be felt. Regarded in themselves,
-they offered, it is true, a fine example of regular and harmonious
-disposition in the greatest of all the works of creation, and a
-striking contrast to the cumbersome mechanism of the cycles and
-epicycles which preceded them; but there their utility seemed to
-terminate, and, indeed, Kepler was reproached, and not without a
-semblance of reason, with having rendered the actual calculation of
-the places of the planets more difficult than before, the resources of
-geometry being then inadequate to resolve the problems to which the
-strict application of his laws gave rise.
-
-(298.) The first result of the invention of the telescope and its
-application to astronomical purposes, by Galileo, was the discovery
-of Jupiter’s disc and satellites,--of a system offering a beautiful
-miniature of that greater one of which it forms a portion, and
-presenting to the eye of sense, at a single glance, that disposition of
-parts which in the planetary system itself is discerned only by the eye
-of reason and imagination (see 195.). Kepler had the satisfaction of
-seeing it ascertained, that the law which he had discovered to connect
-the times of revolution of the planets with their distances from the
-sun, holds good also when applied to the periods of circulation of
-these little attendants round the centre of their principal; thus
-demonstrating it to be something more than a mere empirical rule, and
-to depend on the intimate nature of planetary motion itself.
-
-(299.) It had been objected to the doctrine of Copernicus, that, were
-it true, Venus should appear sometimes horned like the moon. To this
-he answered by admitting the conclusion, and averring that, should we
-ever be able to see its actual shape, it _would_ appear so. It is easy
-to imagine with what force the application would strike every mind when
-the telescope confirmed this prediction, and showed the planet just as
-both the philosopher and his objectors had agreed it ought to appear.
-The history of science affords perhaps only one instance analogous to
-this. When Dr. Hutton expounded his theory of the consolidation of
-rocks by the application of heat, at a great depth below the bed of
-the ocean, and especially of that of marble by actual fusion; it was
-objected that, whatever might be the case with others, with calcareous
-or marble rocks, at least, it was impossible to grant such a cause
-of consolidation, since heat decomposes their substance and converts
-it into quicklime, by driving off the carbonic acid, and leaving a
-substance perfectly infusible, and incapable even of agglutination
-by heat. To this he replied, that the pressure under which the heat
-was applied would prevent the escape of the carbonic acid; and that
-being retained, it might be expected to give that fusibility to the
-compound which the simple quicklime wanted. The next generation saw
-this anticipation converted into an observed fact, and verified by the
-direct experiments of Sir James Hall, who actually succeeded in melting
-marble, by retaining its carbonic acid under violent pressure.
-
-(300.) Kepler, among a number of vague and even wild speculations on
-the causes of the motions whose laws he had developed so beautifully
-and with so much patient labour, had obtained a glimpse of the general
-law of the inertia of matter, as applicable to the great masses of the
-heavenly bodies as well as to those with which we are conversant on
-the earth. After Kepler, Galileo, while he gave the finishing blow to
-the Aristotelian dogmas which erected a barrier between the laws of
-celestial and terrestrial motion, by his powerful argument and caustic
-ridicule, contributed, by his investigations of the laws of falling
-bodies and the motions of projectiles, to lay the foundation of a
-true system of dynamics, by which motions could be determined from a
-knowledge of the forces producing them, and forces from the motions
-they produce. Hooke went yet farther, and obtained a view so distinct
-of the mode in which the planets might be retained in their orbits
-by the sun’s attraction, that, had his mathematical attainments been
-equal to his philosophical acumen, and his scientific pursuits been
-less various and desultory, it can hardly be doubted that he would have
-arrived at a knowledge of the law of gravitation.
-
-(301.) But every thing which had been done towards this great end,
-before Newton, could only be regarded as smoothing some first
-obstacles, and preparing a state of knowledge, in which powers like his
-could be effectually exerted. His wonderful combination of mathematical
-skill with physical research enabled him to invent, at pleasure, new
-and unheard-of methods of investigating the effects of those causes
-which his clear and penetrating mind detected in operation. Whatever
-department of science he touched, he may be said to have formed afresh.
-Ascending by a series of close-compacted inductive arguments to the
-highest axioms of dynamical science, he succeeded in applying them
-to the complete explanation of all the great astronomical phenomena,
-and many of the minuter and more enigmatical ones. In doing this, he
-had every thing to create: the mathematics of his age proved totally
-inadequate to grapple with the numerous difficulties which were to
-be overcome; but this, so far from discouraging him, served only to
-afford new opportunities for the exertion of his genius, which, in the
-invention of the method of fluxions, or, as it is now more generally
-called, the differential calculus, has supplied a means of discovery,
-bearing the same proportion to the methods previously in use, that
-the steam-engine does to the mechanical powers employed before its
-invention. Of the optical discoveries of Newton we have already spoken;
-and if the magnitude of the objects of his astronomical discoveries
-excite our admiration of the mental powers which could so familiarly
-grasp them, the minuteness of the researches into which he there set
-the first example of entering, is no less calculated to produce a
-corresponding impression. Whichever way we turn our view, we find
-ourselves compelled to bow before his genius, and to assign to the
-name of NEWTON a place in our veneration which belongs to no other in
-the annals of science. His era marks the accomplished maturity of the
-human reason as applied to such objects. Every thing which went before
-might be more properly compared to the first imperfect attempts of
-childhood, or the essays of inexpert, though promising, adolescence.
-Whatever has been since performed, however great in itself, and worthy
-of so splendid and auspicious a beginning, has never, in point of
-intellectual effort, surpassed that astonishing one which produced the
-Principia.
-
-(302.) In this great work, Newton shows all the celestial motions known
-in his time to be consequences of the simple law, that every particle
-of matter attracts every other particle in the universe with a force
-proportional to the product of their masses directly, and the square
-of their mutual distance inversely, and is itself attracted with an
-equal force. Setting out from this, he explains how an attraction
-arises between the great spherical masses of which our system consists,
-regulated by a law precisely similar in its expression; how the
-elliptic motions of planets about the sun, and of satellites about
-their primaries, according to the exact rules inductively arrived at
-by Kepler, result as necessary consequences from the same general law
-of force; and how the orbits of comets themselves are only particular
-cases of planetary movements. Thence proceeding to applications of
-greater difficulty, he explains how the perplexing inequalities of
-the moon’s motion result from the sun’s disturbing action; how tides
-arise from the unequal attraction of the sun as well as of the moon
-on the earth, and the ocean which surrounds it; and, lastly, how the
-precession of the equinoxes is a necessary consequence of the very same
-law.
-
-(303.) The immediate successors of Newton found full occupation
-in verifying his discoveries, and in extending and improving the
-mathematical methods which it had now become manifest were to prove
-the keys to an inexhaustible treasure of knowledge. The simultaneous
-but independent discovery of a method of mathematical investigation in
-every respect similar to that of Newton, by Leibnitz, while it created
-a degree of national jealousy which can now only be regretted, had the
-effect of stimulating the continental geometers to its cultivation, and
-impressing on it a character more entirely independent of the ancient
-geometry, to which Newton was peculiarly attached. It was fortunate
-for science that it did so; for it was speedily found that (with one
-fine exception on the part of our countryman Maclaurin, followed up,
-after a long interval, by the late Professor Robison of Edinburgh, with
-equal elegance,) the geometry of Newton was like the bow of Ulysses,
-which none but its master could bend; and that, to render his methods
-available beyond the points to which he himself carried them, it was
-necessary to strip them of every vestige of that antique dress in which
-he had delighted to clothe them. This, however, the countrymen of
-Newton were very unwilling to do; and they paid the penalty in finding
-themselves condemned to the situation of lookers on, while their
-continental neighbours both in Germany and France were pushing forward
-in the career of mathematico-physical discovery with emulous rapidity.
-
-(304.) The legacy of research which Newton may be said to have left
-to his successors was truly immense. To pursue, through all its
-intricacies, the consequences of the law of gravitation; to account for
-all the inequalities of the planetary movements, and the infinitely
-more complicated, and to us more important ones, of the moon; and to
-give, what Newton himself certainly never entertained a conception
-of, a demonstration of the stability and permanence of the system,
-under all the accumulating influence of its internal perturbations;
-this labour, and this triumph, were reserved for the succeeding
-age, and have been shared in succession by Clairaut, D’Alembert,
-Euler, Lagrange and Laplace. Yet so extensive is the subject, and so
-difficult and intricate the purely mathematical enquiries to which it
-leads, that another century may yet be required to go through with
-the task. The recent discoveries of astronomers have supplied matter
-for investigation, to the geometers of this and the next generation,
-of a difficulty far surpassing any thing that had before occurred.
-Five primary planets have been added to our system; four of them
-since the commencement of the present century, and these, singularly
-deviating from the general analogy of the others, and offering _cases
-of difficulty_ in theory, which no one had before contemplated. Yet
-even the intricate questions to which these bodies have given rise
-seem likely to be surpassed by those which have come into view, with
-the discovery of several comets revolving in elliptic orbits, like the
-planets, round the sun, in very moderate periods. But the resources of
-modern geometry seem, so far from being exhausted, to increase with the
-difficulties they have to encounter, and already, among the successors
-of Lagrange and Laplace, the present generation has to enumerate a
-powerful array of names, which promise to render it not less celebrated
-in the annals of physico-mathematical research than that which has just
-passed away.
-
-(305.) Meanwhile the positions, figures, and dimensions of all the
-planetary orbits, are now well known, and their variations from century
-to century in great measure determined; and it has been generally
-demonstrated, that all the changes which the mutual actions of the
-planets on each other can produce in the course of indefinite ages,
-are _periodical_, that is to say, increasing to a certain extent (and
-that never a very great one), and then again decreasing; so that the
-system can never be destroyed or subverted by the mutual action of its
-parts, but keeps constantly oscillating, as it were, round a certain
-mean state, from which it can never deviate to any ruinous extent. In
-particular the researches of Laplace, Lagrange, and Poisson, have shown
-the ultimate invariability of the mean distance of each planet from the
-sun, and consequently of its periodic time. Relying on these grand
-discoveries, we are enabled to look forward, from the point of time
-which we now occupy, many thousands of years into futurity, and predict
-the state of our system without fear of material error, but such as
-may arise from causes whose existence at present we have no reason to
-suppose, or from interference which we have no right to anticipate.
-
-(306.) A correct enumeration and description of the fixed stars in
-catalogues, and an exact knowledge of their position, supply the
-only effectual means we can have of ascertaining what changes they
-are liable to, and what motions, too slow to deprive them of their
-usual epithet, _fixed_, yet sufficient to produce a sensible change
-in the lapse of ages, may exist among them. Previous to the invention
-of the compass, they served as guides to the navigator by night; but
-for this purpose, a very moderate knowledge of a few of the principal
-ones sufficed. Hipparchus was the first astronomer, who, excited
-by the appearance of a new star, conceived the idea of forming a
-catalogue of the stars, with a view to its use as an astronomical
-record, “by which,” says Pliny, “posterity will be able to discover,
-not only whether they are born and die, but also whether they change
-their places, and whether they increase or decrease.” His catalogue,
-containing more than 1000 stars, was constructed about 128 years before
-Christ. It was in the course of the laborious discussion of his own and
-former observations of them, undertaken with a view to the formation of
-this catalogue, that he first recognised the fact of that slow, general
-advance of all the stars eastward, when compared with the place of
-the equinox, which is known under the name of the precession of the
-equinoxes, and which Newton succeeded in referring to a motion in the
-earth’s axis, produced by the attraction of the sun and moon.
-
-(307.) Since Hipparchus, at various periods in the history of
-astronomy, catalogues of stars have been formed, among which that
-of Ulugh Begh, comprising about 1000 stars, constructed in 1437, is
-remarkable as the production of a sovereign prince, working personally
-in conjunction with his astronomers; and that of Tycho Brahe,
-containing 777 stars, constructed in 1600, as having originated in a
-phenomenon similar to that which drew the attention of Hipparchus. In
-more recent times, astronomers provided with the finest instruments
-their respective eras could supply, and established in observatories,
-munificently endowed by the sovereigns and governments of different
-European nations, have vied and are still vying with each other,
-in extending the number of registered stars, and giving the utmost
-possible degree of accuracy to the determination of their places.
-Among these, it would be ungrateful not to claim especial notice
-for the superb series of observations which, under a succession of
-indefatigable and meritorious astronomers, has, for a very long period,
-continued to emanate from our own national observatory of Greenwich.
-
-(308.) The distance of the fixed stars is so immense, that every
-attempt to assign a limit, _within which_ it _must_ fall, has hitherto
-failed. The enquiries of astronomers of all ages have been directed
-to ascertain this distance, by taking the dimensions of our own
-particular system of sun and planets, or of the earth itself, as the
-unit of a scale on which it might be measured. But although many have
-imagined that their observations afforded grounds for the decision
-of this interesting point, it has uniformly happened either that the
-phenomena on which they relied have proved to be referable to other
-causes not previously known, and which the superior accuracy of their
-researches has for the first time brought to light; or to errors
-arising from instrumental imperfections and unavoidable defects of the
-observations themselves.
-
-(309.) The only indication we can expect to obtain of the actual
-distance of a star, would consist in an annual change in its apparent
-place corresponding to the motion of the earth round the sun, called
-its _annual parallax_, and which is nothing more than the measure
-of the apparent size of the earth’s orbit as seen from the star.
-Many observers have thought they have detected a measurable amount
-of this parallax; but as astronomical instruments have advanced in
-perfection, the quantity which they have successively assigned to it
-has been continually reduced within narrower and narrower limits,
-and has invariably been commensurate with the errors to which the
-instruments used might fairly be considered liable. The conclusion this
-strongly presses on us is, that it is really a quantity too small to
-admit of distinct measurement in the present state of our means for
-that purpose; and that, therefore, the distance of the stars must be
-a magnitude of such an order as the imagination almost shrinks from
-contemplating. But this increase in our scale of dimension calls for
-a corresponding enlargement of conception in all other respects. The
-same reasoning which places the stars at such immeasurable remoteness,
-exalts them at the same time into glorious bodies, similar to, and even
-far surpassing, our own sun, the centres perhaps of other planetary
-systems, or fulfilling purposes of which we can have no idea, from any
-analogy in what passes immediately around us.
-
-(310.) The comparison of catalogues, published at different periods,
-has given occasion to many curious remarks, respecting changes both
-of place and brightness among the stars, to the discovery of variable
-ones which lose and recover their lustre periodically, and to that of
-the disappearance of several from the heavens so completely as to have
-left no vestige discernible even by powerful telescopes. In proportion
-as the construction of astronomical and optical instruments has gone on
-improving, our knowledge of the contents of the heavens has undergone
-a corresponding extension, and, at the same time, attained a degree of
-precision which could not have been anticipated in former ages. The
-places of all the principal stars in the northern hemisphere, and of a
-great many in the southern, are now known to a degree of nicety which
-must infallibly detect any real motions that may exist among them,
-and has in fact done so, in a great many instances, some of them very
-remarkable ones.
-
-(311.) It is only since a comparatively recent date, however, that
-any great attention has been bestowed on the smaller stars, among
-which there can be no doubt of the most interesting and instructive
-phenomena being sooner or later brought to light. The minute
-examination of them with powerful telescopes, and with delicate
-instruments for the determination of their places, has, indeed, already
-produced immense catalogues and masses of observations, in which
-thousands of stars invisible to the naked eye are registered; and has
-led to the discovery of innumerable important and curious facts, and
-disclosed the existence of whole classes of celestial objects, of a
-nature so wonderful as to give room for unbounded speculation on the
-extent and construction of the universe.
-
-(312.) Among these, perhaps the most remarkable are the revolving
-double stars, or stars which, to the naked eye or to inferior
-telescopes, appear single; but, if examined with high magnifying
-powers, are found to consist of two individuals placed almost close
-together, and which, when carefully watched, are (many of them) found
-to revolve in regular elliptic orbits about each other; and so far
-as we have yet been able to ascertain, to obey the same laws which
-regulate the planetary movements. There is nothing calculated to give a
-grander idea of the scale on which the sidereal heavens are constructed
-than these beautiful systems. When we see such magnificent bodies
-united in pairs, undoubtedly by the same bond of mutual gravitation
-which holds together our own system, and sweeping over their enormous
-orbits, in periods comprehending many centuries, we admit at once that
-they must be accomplishing ends in creation which will remain for ever
-unknown to man; and that we have here attained a point in science
-where the human intellect is compelled to acknowledge its weakness, and
-to feel that no conception the wildest imagination can form will bear
-the least comparison with the intrinsic greatness of the subject.
-
-
-_Geology._
-
-(313.) The researches of physical astronomy are confessedly incompetent
-to carry us back to the origin of our system, or to a period when
-its state was, in any great essential, different from what it is
-at present. So far as the causes now in action go, and so far as
-our calculations will enable us to estimate their effects, we are
-equally unable to perceive in the general phenomena of the planetary
-system either the evidence of a beginning, or the prospect of an end.
-Geometers, as already stated, have demonstrated that, in the midst of
-all the fluctuations which can possibly take place in the elements of
-the orbits of the planets, by reason of their mutual attraction, the
-general balance of the parts of the system will always be preserved,
-and every departure from a mean state periodically compensated. But
-neither the researches of the physical astronomer, nor those of
-the geologist, give us any ground for regarding our system, or the
-globe we inhabit, as of eternal duration. On the contrary, there are
-circumstances in the physical constitution of our own planet which at
-least obscurely point to an origin and a formation, however remote,
-since it has been found that the figure of the earth is not globular
-but elliptical, and that its attraction is such as requires us to admit
-the interior to be more dense than the exterior, and the density to
-increase with some degree of regularity from the surface towards the
-centre, and _that_, in layers arranged elliptically round the centre,
-circumstances which could scarcely happen without some such successive
-deposition of materials as would enable pressure to be propagated with
-a certain degree of freedom from one part of the mass to another, even
-if we should hesitate to admit a state of primitive fluidity.
-
-(314.) But from such indications nothing distinct can be concluded;
-and if we would speculate to any purpose on a former state of our
-globe and on the succession of events which from time to time may have
-changed the condition and form of its surface, we must confine our
-views within limits far more restricted, and to subjects much more
-within the reach of our capacity, than either the creation of the world
-or its assumption of its present figure. These, indeed, were favourite
-speculations with a race of geologists now extinct; but the science
-itself has undergone a total change of character, even within the last
-half century, and is brought, at length, effectually within the list
-of the inductive sciences. Geologists now no longer bewilder their
-imaginations with wild theories of the formation of the globe from
-chaos, or its passage through a series of hypothetical transformations,
-but rather aim at a careful and accurate examination of the records
-of its former state, which they find indelibly impressed on the great
-features of its actual surface, and to the evidences of former life
-and habitation which organised remains imbedded and preserved in its
-strata indisputably afford.
-
-(315.) Records of this kind are neither few nor vague; and though the
-obsoleteness of their language when we endeavour to interpret it too
-minutely, may, and no doubt often does, lead to misapprehension, still
-its general meaning is, on the whole, unequivocal and satisfactory.
-Such records teach us, in terms too plain to be misunderstood, that
-the whole or nearly the whole of our present lands and continents
-were formerly at the bottom of the sea, where they received deposits
-of materials from the wearing and degradation of other lands not now
-existing, and furnished receptacles for the remains of marine animals
-and plants inhabiting the ocean above them, as well as for similar
-spoils of the land washed down into its bosom.
-
-(316.) These remains are occasionally brought to light; and their
-examination has afforded indubitable evidence of the former existence
-of a state of animated nature widely different from what now obtains
-on the globe, and of a period anterior to that in which it has been
-the habitation of man, or rather, indeed, of a series of periods, of
-unknown duration, in which both land and sea teemed with forms of
-animal and vegetable life, which have successively disappeared and
-given place to others, and these again to new races approximating
-gradually more and more nearly to those which now inhabit them, and at
-length comprehending species which have their counterparts existing.
-
-(317.) These wrecks of a former state of nature, thus wonderfully
-preserved (like ancient medals and inscriptions in the ruins of an
-empire), afford a sort of rude chronology, by whose aid the successive
-depositions of the strata in which they are found may be marked out
-in epochs more or less definitely terminated, and each characterized
-by some peculiarity which enables us to recognise the deposits of any
-period, in whatever part of the world they may be found. And, so far
-as has been hitherto investigated, the _order_ of succession in which
-these deposits have been formed appears to have been the same in every
-part of the globe.
-
-(318.) Many of the strata which thus bear evident marks of having been
-deposited at the bottom of the sea, and of course in a horizontal
-state, are now found in a position highly inclined to the horizon, and
-even occasionally vertical. And they often bear no less evident marks
-of violence, in their bending and fracture, the dislocation of parts
-which were once contiguous, and the existence of vast collections of
-broken fragments which afford every proof of great violence having been
-used in accomplishing some at least of the changes which have taken
-place.
-
-(319.) Besides the rocks which carry this internal evidence of
-submarine deposition, are many which exhibit no such proofs, but on the
-contrary hold out every appearance of owing their origin to volcanoes
-or to some other mode of igneous action; and in every part of the
-world, and among strata of all ages, there occur evidences of such
-action so abundant, and on such a scale, as to point out the volcano
-and the earthquake as agents which may have been instrumental in the
-production of those changes of level, and those violent dislocations
-which we perceive to have taken place.
-
-(320.) At all events, in accounting for those changes, geologists
-have no longer recourse, as formerly, to causes purely hypothetical,
-such as a shifting of the earth’s axis of rotation, bringing the sea
-to overflow the land, by a change in the place of the longer and
-shorter diameters of the spheroidal figure, nor to tides produced by
-the attraction of comets suddenly approaching very near the earth,
-nor to any other fanciful and arbitrarily assumed hypotheses; but
-rather endeavour to confine themselves to a careful consideration
-of causes evidently in action at present, with a view to ascertain
-how far they, in the first instance, are capable of accounting for
-the facts observed, and thus legitimately bringing into view, as
-residual phenomena, those effects which cannot be so accounted for.
-When this shall have been in some measure accomplished, we shall be
-able to pronounce with greater security than at present respecting the
-necessity of admitting a long succession of tremendous and ravaging
-catastrophes and cataclysms,--epochs of terrific confusion and violence
-which many geologists (perhaps with justice) regard as indispensable to
-the explanation of the existing features of the world. We shall learn
-to distinguish between the effects which require for their production
-the sudden application of convulsive and fracturing efforts, and those,
-probably not less extensive, changes which may have been produced by
-forces equally or more powerful, but acting with less irregularity,
-and so distributed over time as to produce none of those _interregnums_
-of chaotic anarchy which we are apt to think (perhaps erroneously)
-great disfigurements of an order so beautiful and harmonious as that of
-nature.
-
-(321.) But to estimate justly the effects of causes now in action in
-geology is no easy task. There is no _à priori_ or deductive process by
-which we can estimate the amount of the annual erosion, for instance,
-of a continent by the action of meteoric agents, rain, wind, frost,
-&c., nor the quantity of destruction produced on its coasts by the
-direct violence of the sea, nor the quantity of lava thrown up _per
-annum_ by volcanoes over the whole surface of the earth, nor any
-similar effect. And to consult experience on all such points is a
-slow and painful process if rightly gone into, and a very fallible
-one if only partially executed. Much, then, at present must be left
-to opinion, and to that sort of clear-judging tact which sometimes
-anticipates experience; but this ought not to stand in the way of our
-making every possible effort to obtain accurate information on such
-points, by which alone geology can be rendered, if not an experimental
-science, at least a science of that kind of active observation which
-forms the nearest approach to it, where actual experiment is impossible.
-
-(322.) Let us take, for example, the question, “What is the actual
-direction in which changes of relative level are taking place between
-the existing continents and seas?” If we consult partial experience,
-that is, _all_ the information that we possess respecting ancient
-sea-marks, soundings, &c., we shall only find ourselves bewildered in
-a mass of conflicting, because imperfect, evidence. It is obvious that
-the only way to decide the point is to ascertain, by very precise and
-careful observations at proper stations on coasts, selected at points
-where there exist natural marks not liable to change in the course of
-at least a century, the true elevation of such marks above the _mean_
-level of the sea, and to multiply these stations sufficiently over the
-whole globe to be capable of affording real available knowledge. Now,
-this is not a very easy operation (considering the accuracy required);
-for the _mean_ level of the sea can be determined by no single
-observation, any more than the mean height of the barometer at a given
-station, being affected both by periodical and accidental fluctuations
-due to tides, winds, waves, and currents. Yet if an instrument adapted
-for the purpose were constructed, and rendered easily attainable, and
-rules for its use carefully drawn up, there is little doubt we should
-soon (by the industry of observers scattered over the world) be in
-possession of a most valuable mass of information, which could not fail
-to afford a point of departure for the next generation, and furnish
-ground for the only kind of argument which ever can be conclusive on
-such subjects.
-
-(323.) Geology, in the magnitude and sublimity of the objects of
-which it treats, undoubtedly ranks, in the scale of the sciences,
-next to astronomy; like astronomy, too, its progress depends on the
-continual accumulation of observations carried on for ages. But, unlike
-astronomy, the observations on which it depends, when the whole extent
-of the subject to be explored is taken into consideration, can hardly
-yet be said to be more than commenced. Yet, to make up for this, there
-is another important difference, that while in the latter science it is
-impossible to recall the past or anticipate the future, and observation
-is in consequence limited to a single fact in a single moment; in
-the former, the records of the past are always present;--they may be
-examined and re-examined as often as we please, and require nothing
-but diligence and judgment to put us in possession of their whole
-contents. Only a very small part of the surface of our globe has,
-however, been accurately examined in detail, and of that small portion
-we are only able to scratch the mere exterior, for so we must consider
-those excavations which we are apt to regard as searching the bowels
-of the earth; since the deepest mines which have been sunk penetrate
-to a depth hardly surpassing the ten thousandth part of the distance
-between its surface and its centre. Of course inductions founded on
-such limited examination can only be regarded as provisional, except
-in those remarkable cases where the same great formations in the same
-order have been recognised in very distant quarters, and without
-exception. This, however, cannot long be the case. The spirit with
-which the subject has been prosecuted for many years in our own country
-has been rewarded with so rich a harvest of surprising and unexpected
-discoveries, and has carried the investigation of our island into such
-detail, as to have excited a corresponding spirit among our continental
-neighbours; while the same zeal which animates our countrymen on their
-native shore accompanies them in their sojourns abroad, and has
-already begun to supply a fund of information respecting the geology of
-our Indian possessions, as well as of every other point where English
-intellect and research can penetrate.
-
-(324.) Nothing can be more desirable than that every possible facility
-and encouragement should be afforded for such researches, and indeed
-to the pursuits of the enlightened resident or traveller in every
-department of science, by the representatives of our national authority
-wherever our power extends. By these only can our knowledge of the
-actual state of the surface of the globe, and that of the animals
-and vegetables of the ancient continents and seas, be extended and
-perfected, while more complete information than we at present possess
-of the habits of those actually existing, and the influence of changes
-of climate, food, and circumstances, on them, may be expected to render
-material assistance to our speculations respecting those which have
-become extinct.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. IV.
-
-OF THE EXAMINATION OF THE MATERIAL CONSTITUENTS OF THE WORLD.
-
-
-_Mineralogy._
-
-(325.) The consideration of the history and structure of our globe, and
-the examination of the fossil contents of its strata, lead us naturally
-to consider the materials of which it consists. The history of these
-materials, their properties as objects of philosophical enquiry, and
-their application to the useful arts and the embellishments of life,
-with the characters by which they can be certainly distinguished one
-from another, form the object of mineralogy, taken in its most extended
-sense.
-
-(326.) There is no branch of science which presents so many points
-of contact with other departments of physical research, and serves
-as a connecting link between so many distant points of philosophical
-speculation, as this. To the geologist, the chemist, the optician, the
-crystallographer, the physician, it offers especially the very elements
-of their knowledge, and a field for many of their most curious and
-important enquiries. Nor, with the exception of chemistry, is there any
-which has undergone more revolutions, or been exhibited in a greater
-variety of forms. To the ancients it could scarcely be said to be at
-all known, and up to a comparatively recent period, nothing could
-be more imperfect than its descriptions, or more inartificial and
-unnatural than its classification. The more important minerals in the
-arts, indeed, those used for economical purposes and those from which
-metals were extracted, had a certain degree of attention paid to them,
-for the sake of their utility and commercial value, and the precious
-stones for that of ornament. But until their crystalline forms were
-attentively observed and shown to be determinate characters on which
-dependence could be placed, no mineralogist could give any correct
-account of the real distinction between one mineral and another.
-
-(327.) It was only, however, when chemical analysis had acquired
-a certain degree of precision and universal applicability that
-the importance of mineralogy as a science began to be recognized,
-and the connection between the external characters of a stone and
-its ingredient constituents brought into distinct notice. Among
-these characters, however, none were found to possess that eminent
-distinctness which the crystalline form offers; a character, in the
-highest degree geometrical, and affording, as might be naturally
-supposed, the strongest evidence of its necessary connection with the
-intimate constitution of the substance. The full importance of this
-character was, however, not felt until its connection with the texture
-or cleavage of a mineral was pointed out, and even then it required
-numerous and striking instances of the critical discernment of Haüy
-and other eminent mineralogists in predicting from the measurements
-of the angles of crystals which had been confounded together that
-differences would be found to exist in their chemical composition, all
-which proved fully justified in their result before the essential value
-of this character was acknowledged. This was no doubt in great measure
-owing to the high importance set by the German mineralogists on those
-external characters of touch, sight, weight, colour, and other sensible
-qualities, which are little susceptible, with the exception of weight,
-of exact determination, and which are subject to material variations
-in different specimens of the same mineral. By degrees, however, the
-necessity of ascribing great weight to a character so definite was
-admitted, especially when it was considered that the same step which
-pointed out the intimate connection of external form with internal
-structure furnished the mineralogist with the means of reducing all
-the forms of which a mineral is susceptible under one general type, or
-primitive form, and afforded grounds for an elegant theoretical account
-of the assumption of definite figures _ab initio_.
-
-(328.) A simple and elegant invention of Dr. Wollaston, the reflecting
-goniometer, gave a fresh impulse to that view of mineralogy which makes
-the crystalline form the essential or leading character, by putting
-it in the power of every one, by the examination of even the smallest
-portion of a broken crystal, to ascertain and verify that essential
-character on which the identity of a mineral in the system of Haüy
-was made to depend. The application of so ready and exact a method
-speedily led to important results, and to a still nicer discrimination
-of mineral species than could before be attained; and the confirmation
-given to these results by chemical analysis stamped them with a
-scientific and decided character which they have retained ever since.
-
-(329.) Meanwhile the progress made in chemical analysis had led to
-the important conclusion that every chemical compound susceptible of
-assuming the solid state assumed with it a determinate crystalline
-form; and the progress of optical science had shown that the
-fundamental crystalline form, in the case at least of transparent
-bodies, drew with it a series of optical properties no less curious
-than important in relation to the affections of light in its passage
-through such substances. Thus, in every point of view, additional
-importance became added to this character; and the study of the
-crystalline forms of bodies in general assumed the form of a separate
-and independent branch of science, of which the geometrical forms of
-the mineral world constituted only a particular case. Mineralogy,
-however, as a branch of natural history, remains still distinct either
-from optics or crystallography. The mineralogist is content, and thinks
-he has performed his task, if not as a natural historian at least as
-a classifier and arranger, if he only gives such a characteristic
-description of a mineral as shall effectually distinguish it from every
-other, and shall enable any one who may encounter such a body in any
-part of the world to impose on it its name, assign it a place in his
-system, and turn to his books for a further description of all that
-the chemist, the optician, the lapidary, or the artist, may require to
-know. Still this is no easy matter: the laborious researches of the
-most eminent mineralogists can hardly yet be said to have effectually
-accomplished it; and its difficulty may be appreciated by the small
-number of simple minerals, or minerals of perfectly definite and
-well-marked characters, which have been hitherto made out. Nor can
-this indeed be wondered at, when we consider that by far the greater
-portion of the rocks and stones which compose the external crust of the
-globe consists of nothing more than the accumulated _detritus_ of older
-rocks, in which the fragments and powder of an infinite variety of
-substances are mingled together, in all sorts of varying proportions,
-and in such a way as to defy separation. Many of these rocks, however,
-so compounded, occur with sufficient frequency and uniformity of
-character to have acquired names and to have been usefully applied;
-indeed, in the latter respect, minerals of this description far surpass
-all the others. As objects of natural history, therefore, they are well
-worthy of attention, however difficult it may be to assign them a place
-in any artificial arrangement.
-
-(330.) This paucity of simple minerals, however, is probably rather
-apparent than real, and in proportion as the researches of the chemist
-and crystallographer shall be extended throughout nature, they will
-no doubt become much more numerous. Indeed, in the great laboratories
-of nature it can hardly be doubted that almost every kind of chemical
-process is going forwards, by which compounds of every description are
-continually forming. Accordingly, it is remarked, that the lavas and
-ejected scoriæ of volcanoes are receptacles in which mineral products
-previously unknown are constantly discovered, and that the primitive
-formations, as they are called in geology, which bear no marks of
-having been produced by the destruction of others, are also remarkable
-for the beauty and distinctness of character of their minerals.
-
-(331.) The great difficulty which has been experienced in attempts to
-classify mineral substances by their chemical constituents has arisen
-from the observed presence, in some specimens of minerals bearing
-that general resemblance in other respects as well as agreement in
-form which would seem to entitle them to be considered as alike, of
-ingredients foreign to the usual composition of the species, and that
-occasionally in so large a proportion as to render it unjustifiable
-to refer their occurrence to accidental impurities. These cases, as
-well as some anomalies observed in the classification of minerals by
-their crystalline forms, which seemed to show that the same substance
-might occasionally appear under two distinct forms, as well as some
-remarkable coincidences between the forms of substances quite distinct
-from each other in a chemical point of view, have within a recent
-period given rise to a branch of the science of crystallography of a
-very curious and important nature. The _isomorphism_ of certain groups
-of chemical elements has already afforded us an example illustrative
-of the manner in which inductions sometimes receive unexpected
-verifications (see 180.). The laws and relations thus brought to light
-are among the most curious and interesting parts of modern science,
-and seem likely in their further developement to afford ample scope
-for the exercise of chemical and mineralogical research. They have
-already afforded innumerable fine examples of that important step in
-science by which anomalies disappear, and occasional incongruities
-become reconciled under more general expressions of physical laws,
-and thus unite in affording support to those very views which they
-promised, when first observed, to overset. Nothing, indeed, can be
-more striking than to see the very ingredient which every previous
-chemist and mineralogist would agree to disregard and reject as a
-mere casual impurity brought forward and appealed to in support of a
-theory expressly directed to the object of rescuing science from the
-imputation of disregarding, under any circumstances, the plain results
-of direct experiment.
-
-
-_Chemistry._
-
-(332.) The laws which concern the intimate constitution of bodies,
-not as respects their _structure_ or the manner in which their parts
-are put together, but as regards their _materials_ or the ingredients
-of which those parts are composed, form the objects of chemistry. A
-solid body may be regarded as a fabric, more or less regularly and
-artificially constructed, in which the materials and the workmanship
-may be separately considered, and in which, though the latter be
-ruined and confounded by violence, the former remain unchanged in
-their nature, though differently arranged. In liquid or aërial bodies,
-too, though there prevails a less degree of difference in point of
-structure, and a greater facility of dispersion and dissipation, than
-in solids, yet an equal diversity of _materials_ subsists, giving to
-them properties differing extremely from each other.
-
-(333.) The inherent activity of matter is proved not only by the
-production of motion by the mutual attractions and repulsions of
-distant or contiguous masses, but by the changes and apparent
-transformations which different substances undergo in their sensible
-qualities by mere mixture. If water be added to water, or salt to salt,
-the effect is an increase of quantity, but no change of quality. In
-this case, the mutual action of the particles is entirely mechanical.
-Again, if a blue powder and a yellow one, each perfectly dry, be mixed
-and well shaken together, a green powder will be produced; but this
-is a mere effect arising in the eye from the intimate mixture of the
-yellow and blue light separately and independently reflected from
-the minute particles of each; and the proof is had by examining the
-mixture with a microscope, when the yellow and blue grains will be seen
-separate and each quite unaltered. If the same experiment be tried with
-coloured liquids, which are susceptible of mixing without chemical
-action, a compound colour is likewise produced, but no examination
-with magnifiers is in that case sufficient to detect the ingredients;
-the reason obviously being, the excessive minuteness of the parts, and
-their perfect intermixture, produced by agitating two liquids together.
-From the mixture of two powders, extreme patience would enable any one,
-by picking out with a magnifier grain after grain, to separate the
-ingredients. But when liquids are mixed, no mechanical separation is
-any longer practicable; the particles are so minute as to elude all
-search. Yet this does not hinder us from regarding such a compound as
-still a mere mixture, and its properties are accordingly intermediate
-between those of the liquids mixed. But this is far from being the
-case with all liquids. When a solution of potash, for example, and
-another of tartaric acid, each perfectly liquid, are mixed together in
-proper proportions, a great quantity of a solid saline substance falls
-to the bottom of the containing vessel, which is quite different from
-either potash or tartaric acid, and the liquid from which it subsided
-offers no indications by its taste or other sensible qualities of the
-ingredients mixed, but of something totally different from either.
-It is evident that this is a phenomenon widely different from that
-of mere mixture; there has taken place a great and radical change in
-the intimate nature of the ingredients, by which a new substance is
-produced which had no existence before. And it has been produced by the
-_union_ of the ingredients presented to each other; for when examined
-it is found that nothing has been _lost_, the weight of the whole
-mixture being the sum of the weights mixed. Yet the potash and tartaric
-acid have disappeared entirely, and the weight of the new product is
-found to be exactly equal to that of the tartaric acid and potash
-employed, taken together, abating a small portion held in solution in
-the liquid, which may be obtained however by evaporation. They have
-therefore combined, and adhere to one another with a cohesive force
-sufficient to form a solid out of a liquid; a force which has thus been
-called into action by merely presenting them to each other in a state
-of solution.
-
-(334.) It is the business of chemistry to investigate these and similar
-changes, or the reverse of such changes, where a single substance is
-resolved into two or more others, having different properties from it,
-and from each other, and to enquire into all the circumstances which
-can influence them; and either determine, modify, or suspend their
-accomplishment, whether such influence be exercised by heat or cold, by
-time and rest, or by agitation or pressure, or by any of those agents
-of which we have acquired a knowledge, such as electricity, light,
-magnetism, &c.
-
-(335.) The wonderful and sudden transformations with which chemistry is
-conversant, the violent activity often assumed by substances usually
-considered the most inert and sluggish, and, above all, the insight
-it gives into the nature of innumerable operations which we see daily
-carried on around us, have contributed to render it the most popular,
-as it is one of the most extensively useful, of the sciences; and
-we shall, accordingly, find none which have sprung forward, during
-the last century, with such extraordinary vigour, and have had such
-extensive influence in promoting corresponding progress in others. One
-of the chief causes of its popularity is, perhaps, to be sought for in
-this, that it is, of all the sciences, perhaps, the most completely an
-experimental one; and even its theories are, for the most part, of that
-generally intelligible and readily applicable kind, which demand no
-intense concentration of thought, and lead to no profound mathematical
-researches. The simple process of inductive generalization, grounded on
-the examination of numerous facts, all of them presenting considerable
-intrinsic interest, has sufficed, in most instances, to lead, by a
-clear and direct road, to its highest laws yet known. But, on the other
-hand, these laws, when stated, are not yet fully sufficient to lead us,
-except in very limited cases, to a deductive knowledge of particulars
-never before examined, at least, not without great caution, and
-constant appeal to experiment as a check on our reasoning; so that we
-are justified in regarding the _axioms_ of chemistry, the true handles
-of deductive reasoning, as still unknown, and, perhaps, likely long
-to remain so. This is no fault of its cultivators, who have comprised
-in their list the highest and most varied talents and industry, but
-of the inherent complexity of the subject, and the infinite multitude
-of causes which are concerned in the production of every, even the
-simplest, chemical phenomenon.
-
-(336.) The history of chemistry (on which, however, we are not about
-to enlarge,) is one of great interest to those who delight to trace
-the steps by which mankind advance to the discovery of truth through
-a series of mistakes and failures. It may be divided, 1st, into
-the period of the alchemists, a lamentable epoch in the annals of
-intellectual wandering; 2dly, that of the phlogistic doctrines of
-Beccher and Stahl, in which, as if to prove the perversity of the human
-mind, of two possible roads the wrong was chosen; and a theory obtained
-universal credence on the strength of an induction, valid as such, but
-wrongly interpreted, which is negatived, _in every instance_, by an
-appeal to the balance. This, too, happened, not by reason of unlucky
-coincidences, or individual oversights, but of necessity, and from an
-inherent defect of the theory itself, which thus impeded the progress
-of the science, as far as a science of experiment can be impeded by
-a false theory, by perplexing its cultivators with the appearance of
-contradictions in their experiments where none really subsisted, by
-destroying all their confidence in the numerical exactness of their
-own results, and by involving the subject in a mist of visionary and
-hypothetical causes in place of the true acting principles. Thus, in
-the combustion of any substance which is incapable of flying away in
-fumes, an increase of weight takes place,--the ashes are heavier than
-the fuel. Whenever this was observed, however, it was passed carelessly
-over as arising from the escape of phlogiston, or the principle of
-inflammability, which was considered as being either the element of
-fire itself, or in some way combined with it, and thus essentially
-_light_. It is now known that the increase of weight is owing to
-the absorption of, and combination with, a quantity of a peculiar
-ingredient called _oxygen_, from the air, a principle essentially
-_heavy_. So far as weight is concerned, it makes no difference whether
-a body having weight enters, or one having levity escapes; but there
-is this plain difference in a philosophical point of view, that oxygen
-is a real producible substance, and phlogiston is no such thing: the
-former is a _vera causa_, the latter an hypothetical being, introduced
-to account for what the other accounts for much better.
-
-(337.) The third age of chemistry--that which may be called
-emphatically modern chemistry--commenced (in 1786) when Lavoisier, by
-a series of memorable experiments, extinguished for ever this error,
-and placed chemistry in the rank of one of the exact sciences,--a
-science of number, weight, and measure. From that epoch to the
-present day it has constantly advanced with an accelerated progress,
-and at this moment may be regarded as more progressive than ever.
-The principal features in this progress may be comprised under the
-following general heads:--
-
- 1. The discovery of the proximate, if not the ultimate, elements
- of all bodies, and the enlargement of the list of known
- elements to its present extent of between fifty and sixty
- substances.
-
- 2. The developement of the doctrine of latent heat by Black,
- with its train of important consequences, including the
- scientific theory of the steam-engine.
-
- 3. The establishment of Wenzel’s law of definite proportions on
- his own experiments, and those of Richter, a discovery
- subsequently merged in the more general wording and better
- development of Dalton’s atomic theory.
-
- 4. The precise determination of the atomic weights of the
- different chemical elements, mainly due to the astonishing
- industry of Berzelius, and his unrivalled command of chemical
- resources, as well as to the researches of the other chemists
- of the Swedish and German school.
-
- 5. The assimilation of gases and vapours, by which we are led
- to regard the former, universally, as particular cases of
- the latter, a generalization resulting chiefly from the
- experiments of Faraday on the condensation of the gases,
- and those of Gay-Lussac and Dalton, on the laws of their
- expansion by heat compared with that of vapours.
-
- 6. The establishment of the laws of the combination of gases and
- vapours by definite volumes, by Gay-Lussac.
-
- 7. The discovery of the chemical effects of electricity, and
- the decomposing agency of the Voltaic pile, by Nicholson
- and Carlisle; the investigation of the laws of such
- decompositions, by Berzelius and Hisinger: the decomposition
- of the alkalies by Davy, and the consequent introduction into
- chemistry of new and powerful agents in their metallic bases.
-
- 8. The application of chemical analysis to all the objects of
- organized and unorganized nature, and the discovery of
- the ultimate constituents of all, and the proximate ones
- of organic matter, and the recognisance of the important
- distinctions which appear to divide these great classes of
- bodies from each other.
-
- 9. The applications of chemistry to innumerable processes in the
- arts, and among other useful purposes to the discovery of the
- essential medical principles in vegetables, and to important
- medicaments in the mineral kingdom.
-
- 10. The establishment of the intimate connection between
- chemical composition and crystalline form, by Haüy
- and Vauquelin, with the successive rectifications the
- statement of that connection has undergone in the hands of
- Mitscherlich, Rose, and others, with the progress of chemical
- and crystallographical knowledge.
-
-(338.) To pursue these several heads into detail would lead us into
-a treatise on chemistry; but a few remarks on one or two of them, as
-they bear upon the general principles of all scientific enquiry, will
-not be irrelevant. And first, then, with reference to the discovery
-of new elements, it will be observed, that philosophical chemistry no
-more aims at determining the one essential element out of which all
-matter is framed--the one ultimate principle of the universe--than
-astronomy at discovering the origin of the planetary movements in
-the application of a determinate projectile force in a determinate
-direction, or geology at ascending to the creation of the earth. There
-may be such an element. Some singular relations which have been pointed
-out in the atomic weights of bodies seem to suggest to minds fond of
-speculation that there is; but philosophical chemistry is content to
-wait for some striking fact, which may either occur unexpectedly or
-be led to by the slow progress of enlarged views, to disclose to us
-its existence. Still, the multiplication of so-considered elementary
-bodies has been considered by some as an inconvenience. We confess
-we do not coincide with this view. Whatever they be, the obstinacy
-with which they resist decomposition shows that they are ingredients
-of a very high and primary importance in the economy of nature; and
-such as, in any state of science, it would be indispensably necessary
-to be perfectly familiar with. Like particular theorems in geometry,
-which, though not rising to the highest point of generality, have yet
-their several scopes and ranges of extensive application, they must be
-well and perfectly understood in all their bearings. Should we ever
-arrive at an analysis of these bodies, the chemical properties of the
-new elements which will then come into view will be known only by our
-knowledge of these, or of other compounds of the same class, which they
-may be capable of forming. Not but that such an analysis would be a
-most important and indeed triumphant achievement, and change the face
-of chemistry; but it would undo nothing that has been done, and render
-useless no point of knowledge which we have yet arrived at.
-
-(339.) The atomic theory, or the law of definite proportions, which
-is the same thing presented in a form divested of all hypothesis,
-after the laws of mechanics, is, perhaps, the most important which
-the study of nature has yet disclosed. The extreme simplicity which
-characterizes it, and which is itself an indication, not unequivocal,
-of its elevated rank in the scale of physical truths, had the effect
-of causing it to be announced at once by Mr. Dalton, in its most
-general terms, on the contemplation of a few instances[53], without
-passing through subordinate stages of painful inductive ascent by the
-intermedium of subordinate laws, such as, had the contrary course been
-pursued by him, would have been naturally preparatory to it, and such
-as would have led others to it by the prosecution of Wenzel’s and
-Richter’s researches, had they been duly attended to. This is, in fact,
-an example, and a most remarkable one, of the effect of that natural
-propensity to generalize and simplify (noticed in 171.), which, if it
-occasionally leads to over-hasty conclusions, limited or disproved by
-further experience, is yet the legitimate parent of many of our most
-valuable and soundest results. Instances like this, where great and,
-indeed, immeasurable steps in our knowledge of nature are made at once,
-and almost without intellectual effort, are well calculated to raise
-our hopes of the future progress of science, and, by pointing out the
-simplest and most obvious combinations as those which are actually
-found to be agreeable to the harmony of creation, to hold out the
-cheering prospect of difficulties diminishing as we advance, instead of
-thickening around us in increasing complexity.
-
-(340.) A consequence of this immediate presentation of the law of
-definite proportions in its most general form is, that its subordinate
-laws--those which limit its generality in particular cases, which
-diminish the number of combinations abstractly possible, and restrain
-the indiscriminate mixture of elements,--remain to be discovered. Some
-such limitations have, in fact, been traced to a certain extent, but by
-no means so far as the importance of the subject requires; and we have
-here abundant occupation for chemists for some time.
-
-(341.) The determination of the atomic weights of the chemical
-elements, like that of other standard physical data, with the utmost
-exactness, is in itself a branch of enquiry not only of the greatest
-importance, but of extreme difficulty. Independent of the general
-reasons for desiring accuracy in this respect, there is one peculiar
-to the subject. It has been suggested (by Dr. Prout), and strongly
-insisted on (by Dr. Thomson), that all the numbers representing these
-weights, constituting a scale of great extent, in which the extremes
-already known are in proportion to each other, as 1 to upwards of 200,
-are simple even multiples of the least of them. If this be really the
-case, it opens views of such importance as to justify any degree of
-labour and pains in the verification of the law as a purely inductive
-one. But in the actual state of chemical analysis, with all deference
-to such high authority, we confess it appears to us to stand in great
-need of further confirmation, since it seems doubtful whether such
-accuracy has yet been attained as to enable us to answer positively
-for a fraction not exceeding the three or four hundredth part of the
-whole quantity to be determined: at least the results of the first
-experimenters, obtained with the greatest care, differ often by a
-greater amount; and this degree of exactness, at least, would be
-required to verify the law satisfactorily in the higher parts of the
-scale.
-
-(342.) The mere agitation of such a question, however, points out
-a class of phenomena in physical science of a remote and singular
-kind, and of a very high and refined order, which could never become
-known but in an advanced state of science, not only practical, but
-theoretical,--we mean, such as consist in observed relations among the
-_data_ of physics, which show them to be quantities not _arbitrarily_
-assumed, but depending on laws and causes which they may be the means
-of at length disclosing. A remarkable instance of such a relation is
-the curious law which Bode observed to obtain in the progression of the
-magnitudes of the several planetary orbits. This law was interrupted
-between Mars and Jupiter, so as to induce him to consider a planet
-as wanting in that interval;--a deficiency long afterwards strangely
-supplied by the discovery of _four_ new planets in that very interval,
-all of whose orbits conform in dimension to the law in question, within
-such moderate limits of error as may be due to causes independent of
-those on which the law itself ultimately rests.[54]
-
-(343.) Neither is it irrelevant to our subject to remark, that the
-progress which has been made in this department of chemistry, and
-the considerable exactness actually attainable in chemical analysis,
-have been owing, in great measure, to a circumstance which might at
-first have been hardly considered likely to exercise much influence
-on the progress of a science,--the discovery of platina. Without the
-resources placed at the ready disposal of chemists by this invaluable
-metal, it is difficult to conceive that the multitude of delicate
-analytical experiments which have been required to construct the fabric
-of existing knowledge could have ever been performed. This, among many
-such lessons, will teach us that the most important uses of natural
-objects are not those which offer themselves to us most obviously. The
-chief use of the moon for man’s immediate purposes remained unknown to
-him for five thousand years from his creation. And, since it cannot but
-be that innumerable and most important uses remain to be discovered
-among the materials and objects already known to us, as well as among
-those which the progress of science must hereafter disclose, we may
-hence conceive a well-grounded expectation, not only of constant
-increase in the physical resources of mankind, and the consequent
-improvement of their condition, but of continual accessions to our
-power of penetrating into the arcana of nature, and becoming acquainted
-with her highest laws.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. V.
-
-OF THE IMPONDERABLE FORMS OF MATTER.
-
-
-_Heat._
-
-(344.) One of the chief agents in chemistry, on whose proper
-application and management the success of a great number of its
-enquiries depends, and many of whose most important laws are disclosed
-to us by phenomena of a chemical nature, is HEAT. Although some of
-its effects are continually before our eyes as matters of the most
-common occurrence, insomuch that there is scarcely any process in the
-useful arts and manufactures which does not call for its intervention,
-and although, independent of this high utility, and the proportionate
-importance of a knowledge of its nature and laws, it presents in itself
-a subject of the most curious speculation; yet there is scarcely
-any physical agent of which we have so imperfect a knowledge, whose
-intimate nature is more hidden, or whose laws are of such delicate and
-difficult investigation.
-
-(345.) The word heat generally implies the sensation which we
-experience on approaching a fire; but, in the sense it carries in
-physics, it denotes the cause, whatever it be, of that sensation, and
-of all the other phenomena which arise on the application of fire,
-or of any other heating cause. We should be greatly deceived if we
-referred only to sensation as an indication of the presence of this
-cause. Many of those things which excite in our organs, and especially
-of those of taste, a sensation of heat, owe this property to chemical
-stimulants, and not at all to their being actually _hot_. This error
-of judgment has produced a corresponding confusion of language, and
-hence had actually at one period[55] crept into physical philosophy
-a great many illogical and absurd conclusions. Again, there are a
-number of chemical agents, which, from their corroding, blackening, and
-dissolving, or drying up the parts of some descriptions of bodies, and
-producing on them effects not generally unlike (though intrinsically
-very different from) those produced by heat, are said, in loose and
-vulgar language, to burn them; and this error has even become rooted
-into a prejudice, by the fact that some of these agents are capable
-of becoming actually and truly _hot_ during their action on moist
-substances, by reason of their combination with the water the latter
-contain. Thus, quicklime and oil of vitriol both exercise a powerful
-corrosive action on animal and vegetable substances, and both become
-violently hot by their combination with water. They are, therefore,
-set down in vulgar parlance as substances of a hot nature; whereas,
-in their relations to the physical cause of heat, they agree with the
-generality of bodies similarly constituted.
-
-(346.) The nature of heat has hitherto been chiefly studied under the
-general heads of--
-
- 1st, Its sources, or the phenomena which it usually accompanies.
-
- 2d, Its communication from its sources to substances capable of
- receiving it, and from these to others, with a view to
- discover the laws which regulate its distribution through
- space or through the bodies which occupy it.
-
- 3d, Its effects, on our senses, and on the bodies to which it is
- communicated in its various degrees of intensity, by which,
- means are afforded us of measuring these degrees.
-
- 4th, Its intimate relations to the atoms of matter, as exhibited
- in its capability of acquiring a latent state under certain
- circumstances, and of entering into something like chemical
- combinations.
-
-(347.) The most obvious sources of heat are, the sun, fire, animal
-life, fermentations, violent chemical actions of all kinds, friction,
-percussion, lightning, or the electric discharge, in whatever manner
-produced, the sudden condensation of air, and others, so numerous,
-and so varied, as to show the extensive and important part it has
-to perform in the economy of nature. The discoveries of chemists,
-however, have referred most of these to the general head of chemical
-combination. Thus, fire, or the combustion of inflammable bodies, is
-nothing more than a violent chemical action attending the combination
-of their ingredients with the oxygen of the air. Animal heat is, in
-like manner, referable to a process bearing no remote analogy to
-a slow combustion, by which a portion of carbon, an inflammable
-principle existing in the blood, is united with the oxygen of the air
-in respiration; and thus carried off from the system: fermentation
-is nothing more than a decomposition of chemical elements loosely
-united, and their re-union in a more permanent state of combination.
-The analogy between the sun and terrestrial fire is so natural as to
-have been chosen by Newton to exemplify the irresistible force of an
-inference derived from that principle. But the nature of the sun and
-the mode in which its wonderful supply of light and heat is maintained
-are involved in a mystery which every discovery that has been made
-either in chemistry or optics, so far from elucidating, seems only to
-render more profound. Friction as a source of heat is well known: we
-rub our hands to warm them, and we grease the axles of carriage-wheels
-to prevent their setting fire to the wood; an accident which, in
-spite of this precaution, does sometimes happen. But the effect of
-friction, as a means of producing heat with little or no consumption
-of materials, was not fully understood till made the subject of direct
-experiment by count Rumford, whose results appear to have established
-the extraordinary fact, that an unlimited supply of heat may be derived
-by friction from the same materials. Condensation, whether of air by
-pressure, or of metals by percussion, is another powerful source of
-heat. Thus, iron may be so dexterously hammered as to become red-hot,
-and the rapid condensation of a confined portion of air will set tinder
-on fire.
-
-(348.) The most violent heats known are produced by the concentration
-of the solar rays by burning glasses,--by the combustion of oxygen and
-hydrogen gases mixed in the exact proportion in which they combine to
-produce water,--and by the discharge of a continued and copious current
-of electricity through a small conductor. As these three sources of
-heat are independent of each other, and each capable of being brought
-into action in a very confined space, there seems no reason why they
-might not all three be applied at once at the same point, by which
-means, probably, effects would be produced infinitely surpassing any
-hitherto witnessed.
-
-(349.) Heat is communicated either by _radiation_ between bodies at a
-distance, or by _conduction_ between bodies in contact, or between the
-contiguous parts of one and the same body. The laws of the radiation
-of heat have been studied with great attention, and have been found
-to present strong analogies with that of light in some points, and
-singular differences in others. Thus, the heat which accompanies the
-sun’s rays comports itself, in all respects, like light; being subject
-to similar laws of reflection, refraction, and even of polarization, as
-has been shown by Berard. Yet they are not identical with each other;
-Sir William Herschel having shown, by decisive experiments, verified by
-those of Sir H. Englefield, that there exist in a solar beam both rays
-of heat which are not luminous, and rays of light which have no heating
-power.
-
-(350.) The heat, radiated by terrestrial fires, and by bodies
-_obscurely_ hot, by whatever means they have acquired their heat
-(even by exposure to the sun’s rays), differs very materially from
-solar heat in their power of penetrating transparent substances. This
-singular and important difference was first noticed by Mariotte, and
-afterwards made the subject of many curious and interesting experiments
-by Scheele, who found that terrestrial heat, or that radiated from
-fires or heated bodies, is intercepted and detained by glass or
-other transparent bodies, while solar heat is not; and that, being
-so detained, it heats them: which the latter, as it passes freely
-through them, is incapable of doing. The more recent researches of
-Delaroche, however, have shown that this detention is complete only
-when the temperature of the source of heat is low; but that, as that
-temperature is higher, a portion of the heat radiated acquires a
-power of penetrating glass; and that the quantity which does so bears
-continually a larger and larger proportion to the whole, as the heat
-of the radiant body is more intense. This discovery is very important,
-as it establishes a community of nature between solar and terrestrial
-heat; while at the same time it leads us to regard the actual
-temperature of the sun as far exceeding that of any earthly flame.
-
-(351.) A variety of theories have been framed to account for these
-curious phenomena; but the subject stands rather in need of further
-elucidation from experiment, and is one which merits, and will probably
-amply repay, the labours of those who may hereafter devote their
-attention to it. The theory of the radiation of heat, in general, which
-seems to agree best with the known phenomena, is that of M. Prevost,
-who considers all bodies as constantly radiating out heat in all
-directions, and receiving it by a similar means of communication from
-others, and thus tending, in any space filled, wholly or in part, with
-bodies at various temperatures, to establish an equilibrium or equality
-of heat in all parts. The application of this idea to the explanation
-of the phenomenon of dew we have already seen (see 167.). The laws
-of such radiation, under various circumstances, have been lately
-investigated in a beautiful series of experiments on the cooling of
-bodies by their own radiation in vacuo, by Messrs. Dulong and Petit,
-which offer some of the best examples in science of the inductive
-investigation of quantitative laws.
-
-(352.) The communication of heat between bodies in contact, or between
-the different parts of the same body, is performed by a process called
-conduction. It is, in fact, only a particular case of radiation, as
-has been explained above (217.); but a case _so_ particular as to
-require a separate and independent investigation of its laws. The most
-important consideration introduced into the enquiry by this peculiarity
-is that of time. The communication of heat by conduction is performed,
-for the most part, with extreme slowness, while that performed by
-direct radiation is probably not less rapid than the propagation
-of light itself. The analysis of the delicate and difficult points
-which arise in the investigation of this subject in its reduction
-to direct geometrical treatment has been executed with admirable
-success by the late Baron Fourrier, whose recent lamented death has
-deprived science of an ornament it could ill spare, thinned as its
-ranks have been within the last few years. This acute philosopher and
-profound mathematician has developed, in a series of elaborate memoirs
-presented to the French Institute, the laws of the communication of
-heat through the interior of solid masses, placed under the influence
-of any external heating and cooling causes, and has in particular
-applied his results to the conditions on which the maintenance of the
-actual observed temperature on the earth’s surface depends; to the
-possible influence of a supposed central heat on our climates; and to
-the determination of the actual amount of the heat, derived to us from
-the sun, or at least that portion of it on which the difference of the
-seasons depends.
-
-(353.) The principal effects of heat are the sensations of warmth or
-cold consequent on its entry or egress into or out of our bodies; the
-dilatation it causes in the dimensions of all substances in which it is
-accumulated; the changes of state it produces in the melting of solids,
-and the conversion of them and of liquids into vapour; and the chemical
-changes it performs by actual decompositions effected in the intimate
-molecules of various substances, especially those of which vegetables
-and animals are composed; to which we may add, the production of
-electric phenomena under certain circumstances in the contact of
-metals, and the developement of electric polarity in crystallised
-substances.
-
-(354.) Cold has been considered by some as a positive quality, the
-effect of a cause antagonist to that of heat; but this idea seems
-now (with perhaps a single exception) to be universally abandoned.
-The sensation of cold is as easily explicable by the passage of heat
-outwards through the surface of the body as that of heat by its ingress
-from without; and the experiments cited in proof of a radiation of
-cold are all perfectly explained by Prevost’s theory of reciprocal
-interchange. It is remarkable, however, how very limited our means
-of producing intense cold are, compared with those we possess of
-effecting the accumulation of heat in bodies. This is one of the
-strongest arguments adducible in favour of the doctrines of those who
-maintain the possibility of exhausting the heat of a body altogether,
-and leaving it in a state absolutely devoid of it. But we ought to
-consider, that the known methods of generating heat chiefly turn on the
-production of chemical combinations: we may easily conceive, therefore,
-that, to obtain equally powerful corresponding frigorific effects, we
-ought to possess the means of effecting a disunion equally extensive
-and rapid between such elements, actually combined, as have already
-produced heat by their union. This, however, we can only accomplish by
-engaging them in combinations still more energetic, that is to say,
-in which we may reasonably expect more heat to be produced by the new
-combination than would be destroyed or abstracted by the proposed
-decomposition. Chemistry, however, (unaided by electric agency,)
-affords no means of suddenly breaking the union of two elements, and
-presenting _both_ in an uncombined state. A certain analogy to such
-disunion, however, and its consequences, may be traced in the sudden
-expansion of condensed gases from a liquid state into vapour, which is
-the most powerful source of cold known.
-
-(355.) The dilatation of bodies by heat forms the subject of that
-branch of science called pyrometry. There is no body but is capable
-of being penetrated by heat, though some with greater, others with
-less rapidity; and being so penetrated, all bodies (with a very few
-exceptions, and those depending on very peculiar circumstances,) are
-dilated by it in bulk, though with a great diversity in the amount
-of dilatation produced by the same degree of heat. Of the several
-forms of natural bodies, gases and vapours are observed to be most
-dilatable; liquids next, and solids least of all. The dilatation of
-solids has been made a subject of repeated and careful measurement by
-several experimenters; among whom, Smeaton, Lavoisier, and Laplace, are
-the principal. The remarkable discovery of the unequal dilatation of
-crystallised bodies by Mitscherlich has already been spoken of. (266.)
-That of gases and vapours was examined about the same time by Dalton
-and Gay-Lussac, who both arrived independently at the conclusion of an
-equal dilatability subsisting in them all, which constitutes one of the
-most remarkable points in their history.
-
-(356.) The dilatation of air by heat affords, perhaps, the most
-unexceptionable means known of measuring degrees of heat. The
-thermometer, as originally constructed by Cornelius Drebell, was an
-air thermometer. Those now in common use measure accessions of heat
-not by the degree of dilatation of air but of mercury. It has been
-shown, by the researches of Dulong and Petit, that its indications
-coincide exactly with that of the air-thermometer in moderate
-temperatures; though at very elevated ones they exhibit a sensible,
-and even considerable, deviation. By this instrument, which owes its
-present convenience and utility to the happy idea of Newton, who first
-thought of fixing determinate points on its scale, we are enabled
-to estimate, or at least identify, the degrees of heat; and thereby
-to investigate with accuracy the laws of its communication and its
-other properties. Were we sure that equal additions of heat produced
-equal increments of dimension in any substance, the indications of a
-thermometer would afford a true and secure _measure_ of the quantity
-present; but this is so far from being the case, that we are nearly in
-total ignorance on this important point; a circumstance which throws
-the greatest difficulty in the way of all theoretical reasoning, and
-even of experimental enquiry. The laws of the dilatation of liquids, in
-consequence of this deficiency of necessary preliminary knowledge, are
-still involved in great obscurity, notwithstanding the pains which have
-been bestowed on them by the elaborate experiments and calculations of
-Gilpin, Blagden, Deluc, Dalton, Gay-Lussac, and Biot.
-
-(357.) The most striking and important of the effects of heat consist,
-however, in the liquefaction of solid substances, and the conversion of
-the liquids so produced into vapour. There is no solid substance known
-which, by a sufficiently intense heat, may not be melted, and finally
-dissipated in vapour; and this analogy is so extensive and cogent,
-that we cannot but suppose that all those bodies which are liquid
-under ordinary circumstances, owe their liquidity to heat, and would
-freeze or become solid if their heat could be sufficiently reduced.
-In many we see this to be the case in ordinary winters; for some,
-severe frosts are requisite; others freeze only with the most intense
-artificial colds; and some have hitherto resisted all our endeavours;
-yet the number of these last is few, and they will probably cease to be
-exceptions as our means of producing cold become enlarged.
-
-(358.) A similar analogy leads us to conclude that all aëriform
-fluids are merely liquids kept in the state of vapour by heat. Many
-of them have been actually condensed into the liquid state by cold
-accompanied with violent pressure; and as our means of applying these
-causes of condensation have improved, more and more refractory ones
-have successively yielded. Hence we are fairly entitled to extend our
-conclusion to those which we have not yet been able to succeed with;
-and thus we are led to regard it as a general fact, that the liquid and
-aëriform or vaporous states are entirely dependent on _heat_; that were
-it not for this cause, there would be nothing but solids in nature; and
-that, on the other hand, nothing but a sufficient intensity of heat is
-requisite to destroy the cohesion of every substance, and reduce all
-bodies, first to liquids, and then into vapour.
-
-(359.) But solids, themselves, by the abstraction of heat shrink in
-dimension, and at the same time become harder, and more brittle;
-yielding less to pressure, and permitting less separation between
-their parts by tension. These facts, coupled with the greater
-compressibility of liquids, and the still greater of gases, strongly
-induce us to believe that it is heat, and heat alone, which holds
-the particles of all bodies at that distance from each other which
-is necessary to allow of compression; which in fact gives them
-their elasticity, and acts as the antagonist force to their mutual
-attraction, which would otherwise draw them into actual contact, and
-retain them in a state of absolute immobility and impenetrability.
-Thus we learn to regard heat as one of the great maintaining powers of
-the universe, and to attach to all its laws and relations a degree of
-importance which may justly entitle them to the most assiduous enquiry.
-
-(360.) It was first ascertained by Dr. Black that when heat produces
-the liquefaction of a solid, or the conversion of a liquid into vapour,
-the liquid or the vapour resulting is no _hotter_ than the solid or
-liquid from which it was produced, though a great deal of heat has been
-expended in producing this effect, and has actually entered into the
-substance.
-
-(361.) Hence he drew the conclusion that it has become _latent_, and
-continues to exist in the product, maintaining it in its new state,
-without increasing its temperature. He further proved, that when the
-vapour condenses, or the liquid freezes, this latent heat is again
-given out from it. This great discovery, with its natural and hardly
-less important concomitant, that of the difference of specific heats in
-different bodies, or the different quantities of heat they require to
-raise their temperature equally, are the chief reasons for regarding
-heat as a material substance in a more decided manner than light, with
-which in its radiant state it holds so close an analogy.
-
-(362.) The subject of latent heat has been far less attentively
-studied than its great practical importance would appear to demand,
-when we consider that it is to this part of physical science that the
-theory of the steam-engine is mainly referable, and that material
-improvements may not unreasonably be expected in that wonderful
-instrument, from a more extended knowledge than we possess of the
-latent heats of different vapours. This is not the case, however,
-with the subject of specific heat, which was followed up immediately
-after its first promulgation with diligence by Irvine; and, after a
-brief interval, by Lavoisier and Laplace, as well as by our countryman
-Crawfurd, who determined the specific heats of many substances, both
-solid and liquid. After a considerable period of inactivity, the
-subject was again resumed by Delaroche and Berard, and subsequently
-by Dulong and Petit: the result of whose investigations has been the
-inductive establishment of one of those simple and elegant physical
-laws which carry with them, if not their own evidence, at least their
-own recommendation to our belief, as being in unison with every thing
-we know of the harmony of nature. The law to which we allude is
-this:--that the atoms of all the simple chemical elements have exactly
-the same capacity for heat, or are all equally heated or cooled by
-equal accessions or abstractions of heat. It is only among laws like
-this that we can expect to find a clew capable of guiding us to a
-knowledge of the true nature of heat, and its relations to ponderable
-matter.
-
-
-_Magnetism and Electricity._
-
-(363.) These two subjects, which had long maintained a distinct
-existence, and been studied as separate branches of science, are at
-length effectually blended. This is, perhaps, the most satisfactory
-result which the experimental sciences have ever yet attained. All
-the phenomena of magnetic polarity, attraction, and repulsion, have
-at length been resolved into one general fact, that two currents of
-electricity, moving in the same direction repel, and in contrary
-directions attract, each other. The phenomena of the communication
-of magnetism and what is called its induced state, alone remain
-unaccounted for; but the interesting theory which has been developed
-by M. Ampere, under the name of Electro-dynamics, holds out a hope
-that this difficulty will also in its turn give way, and the whole
-subject be at length completely merged, as far as the consideration of
-the acting causes goes, in the more general one of electricity. This,
-however, does not prevent magnetism from maintaining its separate
-importance as a department of physical enquiry, having its own peculiar
-laws and relations of the highest practical interest, which are capable
-of being studied quite apart from all consideration of its electrical
-origin. And not only so, but to study them with advantage, we must
-proceed as if that origin were totally unknown, and, at least up to
-a certain point, and that a considerably advanced one, conduct our
-enquiries into the subject on the same inductive principles as if this
-branch of physics were absolutely independent of all others.
-
-(364.) Iron, and its oxides and alloys, were for a long time the only
-substances considered susceptible of magnetism. The loadstone was
-even one of the examples produced by Bacon of that class of physical
-instances to which he applies the term “Instantiæ monodicæ”--_singular
-instances_. And the history of magnetism affords a beautiful comment
-on his remark on instances of this sort. “Nor should our enquiries,”
-he observes, “into their nature be broken off, till the properties and
-qualities found in such things as may be esteemed wonders in nature
-are reduced and comprehended under some certain law; so that all
-irregularity or singularity may be found to depend upon some common
-form, and the wonder only rest in the exact differences, degrees,
-or extraordinary concurrence, and not in the species itself.” The
-discovery of the magnetism of nickel, which though inferior to that
-of iron, is still considerable; that of cobalt, yet feebler, and
-that of titanium, which is only barely perceptible, have effectually
-broken down the imaginary limit between iron and the other materials
-of the world, and established the existence of that general law of
-continuity which it is one chief business of philosophy to trace
-throughout nature. The more recent discoveries of M. Arago (mentioned
-in 160.) have completed this generalization, by showing that there
-is no substance but which, under proper circumstances, is capable of
-exhibiting unequivocal signs of the magnetic virtue. And to obliterate
-all traces of that line of separation which was once so broad, we are
-now enabled, by the great discovery of Oërsted, to communicate at and
-during pleasure to a coiled wire of any metal indifferently all the
-properties of a magnet;--its attraction, repulsion, and polarity; and
-_that_ even in a more intense degree than was previously thought to
-be possible in the best natural magnets. In short, in this case, and
-in this case only, perhaps, in science, have we arrived at that point
-which Bacon seems to have understood by the discovery of “forms.” “The
-_form_ of any nature,” says he, “is such, that where it is, the given
-nature must infallibly be. The form, therefore, is perpetually present
-when that nature is present; ascertains it universally, and accompanies
-it every where. Again, this form is such, that when removed, the given
-nature infallibly vanishes. Lastly, a true form is such as can deduce
-a given nature from some essential property, which resides in many
-things.”
-
-(365.) Magnetism is remarkable in another important point of view. It
-offers a prominent, or “_glaring instance_” of that quality in nature
-which is termed _polarity_ (267.), and that under circumstances which
-peculiarly adapt it for the study of this quality. It does not appear
-that the ancients had any knowledge of this property of the magnet,
-though its attraction of iron was well known to them. The first mention
-of it in modern times cannot be traced earlier than 1180, though it
-was probably known to the Chinese before that time. The polarity of
-the magnet consists in this, that if suspended freely, one part of it
-will invariably direct itself towards a certain point in the horizon,
-the other towards the opposite point; and that, if two magnets, so
-suspended, be brought near each other, there will take place a mutual
-action, in consequence of which, the positions of both will be
-disturbed, in the same manner as would happen if the corresponding
-parts of each repelled, and those oppositely directed attracted, each
-other; and by properly varying the experiment, it is found that they
-really do so. If a small magnet, freely suspended, be brought into
-the neighbourhood of a larger one, it will take a position depending
-on the position of the _poles_ of the larger one, with respect to its
-point of suspension. And it has been ascertained that these and all
-other phenomena exhibited by magnets in their mutual attractions and
-repulsions are explicable on the supposition of two forces or virtues
-lodged in the particles of the magnets, the one predominating at one
-end, the other at the other; and such that each particle shall attract
-those in which the _opposite_ virtue to its own prevails, and repel
-those in which a _similar_ one resides with a force proportional to the
-inverse square of their mutual distance.
-
-(366.) The direction in which a magnetic bar, or needle of steel,
-freely suspended, places itself, has been ascertained to be different
-at different points of the earth’s surface. In some places it points
-exactly north and south, in others it deviates from this direction
-more or less, and at some actually stands at right angles to it. This
-remarkable phenomenon, which is called the variation of the needle,
-and which was discovered by Sebastian Cabot in the year 1500, is
-accompanied with another called the dip, noticed by Robert Norman in
-1576. It consists in a tendency of a needle, nicely balanced on its
-centre, when unmagnetized, to _dip_ or point downwards when rendered
-magnetic, towards a point below the horizon, and situated within the
-earth. By tracing the variation and dip over the whole surface of the
-globe, it has been found that these phenomena take place as they would
-do if the earth itself were a great magnet, having its poles deeply
-situated below the surface,--and, what is very remarkable, possessing
-a slow motion within it, in consequence of which neither the variation
-nor dip remain constantly the same at the same place. The laws of this
-motion are at present unknown; but the discovery of electro-magnetism,
-by rendering it almost certain that the earth’s magnetism is merely an
-effect of the continual circulation of great quantities of electricity
-round it, in a direction generally corresponding with that of its
-rotation, have dissipated the greater part of the mystery which hung
-over these phenomena; since a variety of causes, both geological and
-others, may be imagined which may produce considerable deviations in
-the intensity, and partial ones in the direction, of such electric
-currents. The unequal distribution of land and sea in the two
-hemispheres, by affecting the operation of the sun’s heat in producing
-evaporation from the latter, which is probably one of the great sources
-of terrestrial electricity, may easily be conceived to modify the
-general tendency of such currents, and to produce irregularities in
-them, which may render a satisfactory account of whatever still appears
-anomalous in the phenomena of terrestrial magnetism. This branch
-of science thus becomes connected, on a great scale, with that of
-meteorology, one of the most complicated and difficult, but at the same
-time interesting, subjects of physical research; one, however, which
-has of late begun to be studied with a diligence which promises the
-speedy disclosure of relations and laws of which at present we can form
-but a very imperfect notion.
-
-(367.) The communication of magnetism from the earth to a magnetic
-body, or from one magnetic body to another, is performed by a process
-to which the name of induction has been given, and the laws and
-properties of such induced magnetism have been studied with much
-perseverance and success,--practically, by Gilbert, Boyle, Knight,
-Whiston, Cavallo, Canton, Duhamel, Rittenhouse, Scoresby, and others;
-and theoretically, by Æpinus, Coulomb, and Poisson, and in our own
-country by Messrs. Barlow and Christie, who have investigated with
-great care the curious phenomena which take place when masses of iron
-are presented successively, in different positions, by rotation on
-an axis, to the influence of the earth’s magnetism. The magnetism of
-crystallized bodies (partly from the extreme rarity of such as are
-susceptible of any considerable magnetic virtue) has not hitherto been
-at all examined, but would probably afford very curious results.
-
-(368.) To electricity the views of the physical enquirer now turn
-from almost every quarter, as to one of those universal powers which
-Nature seems to employ in her most important and secret operations.
-This wonderful agent, which we see in intense activity in lightning,
-and in a feebler and more diffused form traversing the upper regions
-of the atmosphere in the northern lights, is present, probably in
-immense abundance, in every form of matter which surrounds us, but
-becomes sensible only when disturbed by excitements of peculiar
-kinds. The most effectual of these is friction, which we have already
-observed to be a powerful source of heat. Everybody is familiar
-with the crackling sparks which fly from a cat’s back when stroked.
-These, by proper management, may be accumulated in bodies suitably
-disposed to receive them, and, although then no longer visible, give
-evidence of their existence by the exhibition of a vast variety of
-extraordinary phenomena,--producing attractions and repulsions in
-bodies at a distance,--admitting of being transferred by contact, or
-by sudden and violent transilience of the interval of separation, from
-one body to another, under the form of sparks and flashes;--traversing
-with perfect facility the substance of the densest metals, and a
-variety of other bodies called conductors, but being detained by
-others, such as glass, and especially _air_, which are thence called
-non-conductors,--producing painful shocks and convulsive motions, and
-even death itself if in sufficient quantity, in animals through which
-they pass, and finally imitating, on a small scale, all the effects of
-lightning.
-
-(369.) The study of these phenomena and their laws until a
-comparatively recent period occupied the entire attention of
-electricians, and constituted the whole of the science of electricity.
-It appears, as the result of their enquiries, that all the phenomena in
-question are explicable on the supposition that electricity consists
-in a rare, subtle, and highly elastic fluid, which in its tendency
-to expand and diffuse itself pervades with more or less facility
-the substance of conductors, but is obstructed and detained from
-expansion more or less completely by non-conductors. It is supposed,
-moreover, that this electric fluid possesses a power of attraction
-for the particles of all ponderable matter, together with that of a
-repulsion for particles of its own kind. Whether it has weight, or is
-rather to be regarded as a species of matter distinct from that of
-which ponderable bodies consist, is a question of such delicacy, that
-no direct experiments have yet enabled us to decide it; but at all
-events its _inertia_ compared with its elastic force must be conceived
-excessively small, so that it is to be regarded as a fluid in the
-highest degree _active_, obeying every impulse, internal or external,
-with the greatest promptitude; in short, a fluid whose energies can
-only be compared with those of the ethereal medium by which, in the
-undulatory doctrine, light is supposed to be conveyed. The properties
-of hydrogen gas compared with those of the denser aëriform fluids will,
-in some slight degree, aid our conception of the excessive mobility and
-penetrating activity of a fluid so constituted. Electricity, however,
-must be regarded as differing in some remarkable points from all those
-fluids to which we have hitherto been accustomed to apply the epithet
-elastic, such as air, gases, and vapours. In these, the repulsive force
-of the particles on which their elasticity depends is considered as
-extending only to very small distances, so as to affect only those in
-the immediate vicinity of each other, while their attractive power, by
-which they obey the general gravitation of all matter, extends to any
-distance. In electricity, on the other hand, the very reverse must be
-admitted. The force by which its particles repel each other extends to
-great distances, while its force of adhesion to ponderable matter must
-be regarded as limited in its extent to such minute intervals as escape
-observation.
-
-(370.) The conception of a single fluid of this kind, which when
-accumulated in excess in bodies tends constantly to escape, and seek
-a restoration of equilibrium by communicating itself to any others
-where there may be a deficiency, is that which occurs most naturally
-to the mind, and was accordingly maintained by Franklin, to whom the
-science of electricity is under great obligations for those decisive
-experiments which informed us respecting the true nature of lightning.
-The same theory was afterwards advocated by Æpinus, who first showed
-how the laws of equilibrium of such a fluid might be reduced to strict
-mathematical investigation. But there are phenomena accompanying its
-transfer from body to body and the state of equilibrium it affects
-under various circumstances, which appear to require the admission of
-_two distinct fluids_ antagonist to each other, each attracting the
-other, and repelling itself; but each, alike, susceptible of adhesion
-to material substances, and of transfer more or less rapid from
-particle to particle of them. These fluids in the natural undisturbed
-state are conceived to exist in a state of combination and mutual
-saturation; but this combination may be broken, and either of them
-separately accumulated in a body to any amount without the other,
-provided its escape be properly obstructed by surrounding it with
-non-conductors. When so accumulated, its repulsion for its own kind
-and attraction of the opposite species in neighbouring bodies tends
-to disturb the natural equilibrium of the two fluids present in them,
-and to produce phenomena of a peculiar description, which are termed
-_induced_ electricity. Curious and artificial as this theory may
-appear, there has hitherto been produced no phenomenon of which it
-will not afford at least a plausible, and in by far the majority of
-cases a very satisfactory, explanation. It has one character which is
-extremely valuable in any theory, that of admitting the application of
-strict mathematical reasoning to the conclusions we would draw from
-it. Without this, indeed, it is scarcely possible that any theory
-should ever be fairly brought to the test by a comparison with facts.
-Accordingly, the mathematical theory of electrical equilibrium,
-and the laws of the distribution of the electric fluids over the
-surfaces of bodies in which they are accumulated, have been made the
-subject of elaborate geometrical investigation by the most expert
-mathematicians, and have attained a degree of extent and elegance
-which places this branch of science in a very high rank in the scale
-of mathematico-physical enquiry. These researches are grounded on
-the assumption of a law of attraction and repulsion similar to those
-of gravity and magnetism, and which by the general accordance of the
-results with facts, as well as by experiments instituted for the
-express purpose of ascertaining the laws in question, are regarded as
-sufficiently demonstrated.
-
-(371.) The most obscure part of the subject is no doubt the original
-mode of disturbance of electrical equilibrium, by which electricity is
-excited in the first instance, either by friction or by any other of
-those causes which have been ascertained to produce such an effect:
-analogies, it is true, are not wanting[56]; but it must be allowed that
-hitherto nothing decisive has been offered on the subject; and that
-conjectural modes of action have in this instance too often usurped the
-place of those to which a careful examination of facts alone can lead
-us.
-
-(372.) Philosophers had long been familiar with the effects of
-electricity above referred to, and with those which it produces in
-its sudden and violent transfer from one body to another, in rending
-and shattering the parts of the substances through which it passes,
-and where in great quantity, producing all the effect of intense
-heat, igniting, fusing, and volatilizing metals, and setting fire to
-inflammable bodies; even its occasional influence in destroying or
-altering the polarity of the magnetic needle had been noticed: but as
-heat was known to be produced by mechanical violence, and as magnetism
-was also known to be greatly affected by the same cause, these effects
-were referred rather to that cause than to any thing in the peculiar
-nature of the electric matter, and regarded rather as an indirect
-consequence of its mode of action than as connected with its intimate
-nature. In short, electricity seemed destined to furnish another in
-addition to many instances of subjects insulated from the rest of
-philosophy, and capable of being studied only in its own internal
-relations, when the great discoveries of Galvani and Volta placed a new
-power at the command of the experimenter, by whose means those effects
-which had before been crowded within an inappreciable instant could
-be developed in detail and studied at leisure; and those forces which
-had previously exhibited themselves only in a state of uncontrollable
-intensity were tamed down, as it were, and made to distribute their
-efficacy over an indefinite time, and to regulate their action at the
-will of the operator. It was then soon ascertained that electricity
-in the act of its passage along conductors, produces a variety of
-wonderful effects, which had never been previously suspected; and these
-of such a nature, as to afford points of contact with several other
-branches of physical enquiry, and to throw new and unexpected lights on
-some of the most obscure operations of nature.
-
-(373.) The history of this grand discovery affords a fine illustration
-of the advantage to be derived in physical enquiry from a close and
-careful attention to any phenomenon, however apparently trifling,
-which may at the moment of observation appear inexplicable on received
-principles. The convulsive motions of a dead frog in the neighbourhood
-of an electric discharge, which originally drew Galvani’s attention to
-the subject, had been noticed by others nearly a century before his
-time, but attracted no further remark than as indicating a peculiar
-sensibility to electrical excitement depending on that remnant of
-vitality which is not extinguished in the organic frame of an animal
-by the deprivation of actual life. Galvani was not so satisfied. He
-analysed the phenomenon; and in investigating all the circumstances
-connected with it was led to the observation of a peculiar electrical
-excitement which took place when a circuit was formed of three distinct
-parts, a muscle, a nerve, and a metallic conductor, each placed in
-contact with the other two, and which was manifested by a convulsive
-motion produced in the muscle. To this phenomenon he gave the name of
-animal electricity, an unfortunate epithet, since it tended to restrict
-enquiry into its nature to the class of phenomena in which it first
-became apparent. But this circumstance, which in a less enquiring age
-of science might have exercised a fatal influence on the progress of
-knowledge, proved happily no obstacle to the further developement of
-its principles, the subject being immediately taken up with a kind
-of prophetic ardour by Volta, who at once generalized the phenomena,
-rejecting the physiological considerations introduced by Galvani, as
-foreign to the enquiry, and regarding the contraction of the muscles
-as merely a delicate means of detecting the production of electrical
-excitements too feeble to be rendered sensible by any other means.
-It was thus that he arrived at the knowledge of a general fact, that
-of the disturbance of electrical equilibrium by the mere contact of
-different bodies, and the circulation of a current of electricity in
-one constant direction, through a circuit composed of three different
-conductors. To increase the intensity of the very minute and delicate
-effect thus observed became his next aim, nor did his enquiry terminate
-till it had placed him in possession of that most wonderful of all
-human inventions, the pile which bears his name, through the medium of
-a series of well conducted and logically combined experiments, which
-has rarely, if ever, been surpassed in the annals of physical research.
-
-(374.) Though the original pile of Volta was feeble compared to those
-gigantic combinations which were afterwards produced, it sufficed,
-however, to exhibit electricity under a very different aspect from any
-thing which had gone before, and to bring into view those peculiar
-modifications in its action which Dr. Wollaston was the first to
-render a satisfactory account of, by referring them to an increase
-of _quantity_, accompanied with a diminution of _intensity_ in the
-supply afforded. The discovery had not long been made public, and
-the instrument in the hands of chemists and electricians, before it
-was ascertained that the electric current, transmitted by it through
-conducting liquids, produces in them chemical decompositions. This
-capital discovery appears to have been made, in the first instance, by
-Messrs. Nicholson and Carlisle, who observed the decomposition of water
-so produced. It was speedily followed up by the still more important
-one of Berzelius and Hisinger, who ascertained it as a general law,
-that, in all the decompositions so effected, the acids and oxygen
-become transferred to, and accumulated around, the positive,--and
-hydrogen, metals, and alkalies round the negative, pole of a Voltaic
-circuit; being transferred in an invisible, and, as it were, a latent
-or torpid state, by the action of the electric current, through
-considerable spaces, and even through large quantities of water or
-other liquids, again to re-appear with all their properties at their
-appropriate resting-places.
-
-(375.) It was in this state of things that the subject was taken up
-by Davy, who, seeing that the strongest chemical affinities were thus
-readily subverted by the decomposing action of the pile, conceived
-the happy idea of bringing to bear the intense power of the enormous
-batteries of the Royal Institution on those substances which, though
-strongly suspected to be compounds, had resisted all attempts to
-decompose them--the alkalies and earths. They yielded to the force
-applied, and a total revolution was thus effected in chemistry; not so
-much by the introduction of the new elements thus brought to light, as
-by the mode of conceiving the nature of chemical affinity, which from
-that time has been regarded (as Davy broadly laid it down, in a theory
-which was readily adopted by the most eminent chemists, and by none
-more readily than by Berzelius himself,) as entirely due to electric
-attractions and repulsions, those bodies combining most intimately
-whose particles are habitually in a state of the most powerful
-electrical antagonism, and dispossessing each other, according to the
-amount of their difference in this respect.
-
-(376.) The connection of magnetism and electricity had long been
-suspected, and innumerable fruitless trials had been made to determine,
-in the affirmative or negative, the question of such connection. The
-phenomena of many crystallized minerals which become electric by heat,
-and develope opposite electric poles at their two extremities, offered
-an analogy so striking to the polarity of the magnet, that it seemed
-hardly possible to doubt a closer connection of the two powers. The
-developement of a similar polarity in the Voltaic pile pointed strongly
-to the same conclusion; and experiments had even been made with a
-view to ascertain whether a pile in a state of excitement might not
-manifest a disposition to place itself in the magnetic meridian; but
-the essential condition had been omitted, that of allowing the pile to
-discharge itself freely, a condition which assuredly never would have
-occurred of itself to any experimenter. Of all the philosophers who
-had speculated on this subject, none had so pertinaciously adhered to
-the idea of a necessary connection between the phenomena as Oërsted.
-Baffled often, he returned to the attack; and his perseverance was at
-length rewarded by the complete disclosure of the wonderful phenomena
-of electro-magnetism. There is something in this which reminds us of
-the obstinate adherence of Columbus to his notion of the necessary
-existence of the New World; and the whole history of this beautiful
-discovery may serve to teach us reliance on those general analogies
-and parallels between great branches of science by which one strongly
-reminds us of another, though no direct connection appears; as an
-indication not to be neglected of a community of origin.
-
-(377.) It is highly probable that we are still ignorant of many
-interesting features in electrical science, which the study of the
-Voltaic circuit will one day disclose. The violent mechanical effects
-produced by it on mercury, placed under conducting liquids which have
-been referred by Professor Erman to a modified form of capillary
-attraction, but which a careful and extended view of the phenomena
-have led others[57] to regard in a very different light, as pointing
-out a primary action of a dynamical rather than a statical character,
-deserve, in this point of view, a further investigation; and the
-curious relations of electricity to heat, as exhibited in the phenomena
-of what has been called thermo-electricity, promise an ample supply of
-new information.
-
-(378.) Among the remarkable effects of electricity disclosed by the
-researches of Galvani and Volta, perhaps the most so consisted in its
-influence on the nervous system of animals. The origin of muscular
-motion is one of those profound mysteries of nature which we can
-scarcely venture to hope will ever be fully explained. Physiologists,
-however, had long entertained a general conception of the conveyance
-of some subtle fluid or spirit from the brain to the muscles of
-animals along the nerves; and the discovery of the rapid transmission
-of electricity along conductors, with the violent effects produced by
-shocks, transmitted through the body, on the nervous system, would
-very naturally lead to the idea that this nervous fluid, if it had
-any real existence, might be no other than the electrical. But until
-the discoveries of Galvani and Volta, this could only be looked upon
-as a vague conjecture. The character of a _vera causa_ was wanting to
-give it any degree of rational plausibility, since no reason could
-be imagined for the disturbance of the electrical equilibrium in the
-animal frame, composed as it is entirely of conductors, or rather, it
-seemed contrary to the then known laws of electrical communication
-to suppose any such. Yet one strange and surprising phenomenon might
-be adduced indicative of the possibility of such disturbance, viz.
-the powerful shock given by the torpedo and other fishes of the same
-kind, which presented so many analogies with those arising from
-electricity, that they could hardly be referred to a different source,
-though _besides_ the shock neither spark nor any other indication of
-electrical tension could be detected in them.
-
-(379.) The benumbing effect of the torpedo had been ascertained to
-depend on certain singularly constructed organs composed of membranous
-columns, filled from end to end with laminæ, separated from each other
-by a fluid: but of its mode of action no satisfactory account could be
-given; nor was there any thing in its construction, and still less in
-the nature of its materials, to give the least ground for supposing
-it an electrical apparatus. But the pile of Volta supplied at once
-the analogies both of structure and of effect, so as to leave little
-doubt of the electrical nature of the apparatus, or of the power, a
-most wonderful one certainly, of the animal, to determine, by an effort
-of its will, that concurrence of conditions on which its activity
-depends. This remained, as it probably ever will remain, mysterious
-and inexplicable; but the principle once established, that there
-exists in the animal economy a power of determining the developement
-of electric excitement, capable of being transmitted along the nerves,
-and it being ascertained, by numerous and decisive experiments, that
-the transmission of Voltaic electricity along the nerves of even
-a dead animal is sufficient to produce the most violent muscular
-action, it became an easy step to refer the origin of muscular motion
-in the living frame to a similar cause; and to look to the brain, a
-wonderfully constituted organ, for which no mode of action possessing
-the least plausibility had ever been devised, as the source of the
-required electrical power.[58]
-
-(380.) It is not our intention, however, to enter into any further
-consideration of physiological subjects. They form, it is true, a
-most important and deeply interesting province of philosophical
-enquiry; but the view that we have taken of physical science has
-rather been directed to the study of inanimate nature, than to that of
-the mysterious phenomena of organization and life, which constitute
-the object of physiology. The history of the animal and vegetable
-productions of the globe, as affording objects and materials for the
-convenience and use of man, and as dependent on and indicative of the
-general laws which determine the distribution of heat, moisture, and
-other natural agents, over its surface, and the revolutions it has
-undergone, are of course intimately connected with our subject, and
-will, therefore, naturally afford room for some remarks, but not such
-as will long detain the reader’s attention.
-
-(381.) In _zoology_, the connection of peculiar modes of life and
-food, with peculiarities of structure, has given rise to systems of
-classification at once obvious and natural; and the great progress
-which has been made in comparative anatomy has enabled us to trace
-a graduated scale of organization almost through the whole chain of
-animal being; a scale not without its intervals, but which every
-successive discovery of animals heretofore unknown has tended to fill
-up. The wonders disclosed by microscopic observation have opened to
-us a new world, in which we discover, with astonishment, the extremes
-of minuteness and complexity of structure united; while, on the other
-hand, the examination of the fossil remains of a former state of
-creation has demonstrated the existence of animals far surpassing in
-magnitude those now living, and brought to light many forms of being
-which have nothing analogous to them at present, and many others
-which afford important connecting links between existing genera. And,
-on the other hand, the researches of the comparative anatomist and
-conchologist have thrown the greatest light on the studies of the
-geologist, and enabled him to discern, through the obscure medium of a
-few relics, scattered here and there through a stratum, circumstances
-connected with the formation of the stratum itself which he could have
-recognised by no other indication. This is one among many striking
-instances of the unexpected lights which sciences, however apparently
-remote, may throw upon each other.
-
-(382.) To _botany_ many of the same remarks apply. Its artificial
-systems of classification, however convenient, have not prevented
-botanists from endeavouring to group together the objects of their
-science in natural classes having a community of character more
-intimate than those which determine their place in the Linnean or any
-similar system; a community of character extending over the whole
-habit and properties of the individuals compared. The important
-chemical discoveries which have been lately made of peculiar proximate
-principles which, in an especial manner, characterize certain
-families of plants, hold out the prospect of a greatly increased
-field of interesting knowledge in this direction, and not only
-interesting, but in a high degree important, when it is considered
-that the principles thus brought into view are, for the most part,
-very powerful medicines, and are, in fact, the essential ingredients
-on which the medical virtues of the plants depend. The law of the
-distribution of the generic forms of plants over the globe, too, has,
-within a comparatively recent period, become an object of study to the
-naturalist; and its connection with the laws of climate constitutes one
-of the most interesting and important branches of natural-historical
-enquiry, and one on which great light remains to be thrown by future
-researches. It is this which constitutes the chief connecting link
-between botany and geology, and renders a knowledge of the vegetable
-fossils, of any portion of the earth’s surface, indispensable to the
-formation of a correct judgment of the circumstances under which it
-existed in its ancient state. Fossil botany is accordingly cultivated
-with great and increasing ardour; and the subterraneous “Flora” of a
-geological formation is, in many instances, studied with a degree of
-care and precision little inferior to that which its surface exhibits.
-
-
-
-
-CHAP. VI.
-
- OF THE CAUSES OF THE ACTUAL RAPID ADVANCE OF THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- COMPARED WITH THEIR PROGRESS AT AN EARLIER PERIOD.
-
-
-(383.) There is no more extraordinary contrast than that presented by
-the slow progress of the physical sciences, from the earliest ages
-of the world to the close of the sixteenth century, and the rapid
-developement they have since experienced. In the former period of
-their history, we find only small additions to the stock of knowledge,
-made at long intervals of time; during which a total indifference
-on the part of the mass of mankind to the study of nature operated
-to effect an almost complete oblivion of former discoveries, or,
-at best, permitted them to linger on record, rather as literary
-curiosities, than as possessing, in themselves, any intrinsic interest
-and importance. A few enquiring individuals, from age to age, might
-perceive their value, and might feel that irrepressible thirst after
-knowledge which, in minds of the highest order, supplies the absence
-both of external stimulus and opportunity. But the total want of a
-right direction given to enquiry, and of a clear perception of the
-objects to be aimed at, and the advantages to be gained by systematic
-and connected research, together with the general apathy of society
-to speculations remote from the ordinary affairs of life, and
-studiously kept involved in learned mystery, effectually prevented
-these occasional impulses from overcoming the inertia of ignorance, and
-impressing any regular and steady progress on science. Its objects,
-indeed, were confined in a region too sublime for vulgar comprehension.
-An earthquake, a comet, or a fiery meteor, would now and then call the
-attention of the whole world, and produce from all quarters a plentiful
-supply of crude and fanciful conjectures on their causes; but it was
-never supposed that sciences could exist among common objects, have a
-place among mechanical arts, or find worthy matter of speculation in
-the mine or the laboratory. Yet it cannot be supposed, that all the
-indications of nature continually passed unremarked, or that much good
-observation and shrewd reasoning on it failed to perish unrecorded,
-before the invention of printing enabled every one to make his ideas
-known to all the world. The moment this took place, however, the sparks
-of information from time to time struck out, instead of glimmering
-for a moment, and dying away in oblivion, began to accumulate into a
-genial glow, and the flame was at length kindled which was speedily to
-acquire the strength and rapid spread of a conflagration. The universal
-excitement in the minds of men throughout Europe, which the first
-out-break of modern science produced, has been already spoken of. But
-even the most sanguine anticipators could scarcely have looked forward
-to that steady, unintermitted progress which it has since maintained,
-nor to that rapid succession of great discoveries which has kept up
-the interest of the first impulse still vigorous and undiminished. It
-may truly, indeed, be said, that there is scarcely a single branch of
-physical enquiry which is either stationary, or which has not been,
-for many years past, in a constant state of advance, and in which the
-progress is not, at this moment, going on with accelerated rapidity.
-
-(384.) Among the causes of this happy and desirable state of things,
-no doubt we are to look, in the first instance, to that great
-increase in wealth and civilization which has at once afforded the
-necessary leisure and diffused the taste for intellectual pursuits
-among numbers of mankind, which have long been and still continue
-steadily progressive in every principal European state, and which the
-increase and fresh establishment of civilized communities in every
-distant region are rapidly spreading over the whole globe. It is not,
-however, merely the increased number of cultivators of science, but
-their enlarged opportunities, that we have here to consider, which, in
-all those numerous departments of natural research that require local
-information, is in fact the most important consideration of all. To
-this cause we must trace the great extension which has of late years
-been conferred on every branch of natural history, and the immense
-contributions which have been made, and are daily making, to the
-departments of zoology and botany, in all their ramifications. It is
-obvious, too, that all the information that can possibly be procured,
-and reported, by the most enlightened and active travellers, must fall
-infinitely short of what is to be obtained by individuals actually
-resident upon the spot. Travellers, indeed, may make collections,
-may snatch a few hasty observations, may note, for instance, the
-distribution of geological formations in a few detached points, and now
-and then witness remarkable local phenomena; but the resident alone can
-make continued series of regular observations, such as the scientific
-determination of climates, tides, magnetic variations, and innumerable
-other objects of that kind, requires; can alone mark all the details
-of geological structure, and refer each stratum, by a careful and long
-continued observation of its fossil contents, to its true epoch; can
-alone note the habits of the animals of his country, and the limits
-of its vegetation, or obtain a satisfactory knowledge of its mineral
-contents, with a thousand other particulars essential to that complete
-acquaintance with our globe as a whole, which is beginning to be
-understood by the extensive designation of physical geography. Besides
-which, ought not to be omitted multiplied opportunities of observing
-and recording those extraordinary phenomena of nature which offer an
-intense interest, from the rarity of their occurrence as well as the
-instruction they are calculated to afford. To what, then, may we not
-look forward, when a spirit of scientific enquiry shall have spread
-through those vast regions in which the process of civilization, its
-sure precursor, is actually commenced and in active progress? And what
-may we not expect from the exertions of powerful minds called into
-action under circumstances totally different from any which have yet
-existed in the world, and over an extent of territory far surpassing
-that which has hitherto produced the whole harvest of human intellect?
-In proportion as the number of those who are engaged on each department
-of physical enquiry increases, and the geographical extent over which
-they are spread is enlarged, a proportionately increased facility
-of communication and interchange of knowledge becomes essential to
-the prosecution of their researches with full advantage. Not only
-is this desirable, to prevent a number of individuals from making
-the same discoveries at the same moment, which (besides the waste of
-valuable time) has always been a fertile source of jealousies and
-misunderstandings, by which great evils have been entailed on science;
-but because methods of observation are continually undergoing new
-improvements, or acquiring new facilities, a knowledge of which, it is
-for the general interest of science, should be diffused as widely and
-as rapidly as possible. By this means, too, a sense of common interest,
-of mutual assistance, and a feeling of sympathy in a common pursuit,
-are generated, which proves a powerful stimulus to exertion; and, on
-the other hand, means are thereby afforded of detecting and pointing
-out mistakes before it is too late for their rectification.
-
-(385.) Perhaps it may be truly remarked, that, next to the
-establishment of institutions having either the promotion of science
-in general, or, what is still more practically efficacious in its
-present advanced state, that of particular departments of physical
-enquiry, for their express objects, nothing has exercised so powerful
-an influence on the progress of modern science as the publication
-of monthly and quarterly scientific journals, of which there is now
-scarcely a nation in Europe which does not produce several. The quick
-and universal circulation of these, places observers of all countries
-on the same level of perfect intimacy with each other’s objects and
-methods, while the abstracts they from time to time (if well conducted)
-contain of the most important researches of the day consigned to the
-more ponderous tomes of academical collections, serve to direct the
-course of general observation, as well as to hold out, in the most
-conspicuous manner, models for emulative imitation. In looking forward
-to what may hereafter be expected from this cause of improvement, we
-are not to forget the powerful effect which must in future be produced
-by the spread of elementary works and digests of what is actually known
-in each particular branch of science. Nothing can be more discouraging
-to one engaged in active research, than the impression that all he
-is doing may, very likely, be labour taken in vain; that it may,
-perhaps, have been already done, and much better done, than, with his
-opportunities, or his resources, he can hope to perform it; and, on the
-other hand, nothing can be more exciting than the contrary impression.
-Thus, by giving a connected view of what has been done, and what
-remains to be accomplished in every branch, those digests and bodies
-of science, which from time to time appear, have, in fact, a very
-important weight in determining its future progress, quite independent
-of the quantity of information they communicate. With respect to
-elementary treatises, it is needless to point out their utility, or
-to dwell on the influence which their actual abundance, contrasted
-with their past remarkable deficiency, is likely to exercise over the
-future. It is only by condensing, simplifying, and arranging, in the
-most lucid possible manner, the acquired knowledge of past generations,
-that those to come can be enabled to avail themselves to the full of
-the advanced point from which they will start.
-
-(386.) One of the means by which an advanced state of physical science
-contributes greatly to accelerate and secure its further progress,
-is the exact knowledge acquired of physical data, or those normal
-quantities which we have more than once spoken of in the preceding
-pages (222.); a knowledge which enables us not only to appretiate
-the accuracy of experiments, but even to correct their results. As
-there is no surer criterion of the state of science in any age than
-the degree of care bestowed, and discernment exhibited, in the choice
-of such data, so as to afford the simplest possible grounds for the
-application of theories, and the degree of accuracy attained in their
-determination, so there is scarcely any thing by which science can be
-more truly benefited than by researches directed expressly to this
-object, and to the construction of tables exhibiting the true numerical
-relations of the elements of theories, and the actual state of nature,
-in all its different branches. It is only by such determinations that
-we can ascertain what changes are slowly and imperceptibly taking place
-in the existing order of things; and the more accurate they are, the
-_sooner_ will this knowledge be acquired. What might we not now have
-known of the motions of the (so-called) fixed stars, had the ancients
-possessed the means of observation we now possess, and employed them
-as we employ them now?
-
-(387.) In any enumeration of causes which have contributed to
-the recent rapid advancement of science, we must not forget the
-very important one of improved and constantly improving means of
-observation, both in instruments adapted for the exact measurement of
-quantity, and in the general convenience and well-judged adaptation
-to its purposes, of every description of scientific apparatus. In
-the actual state of science there are few observations which can
-be productive of any great advantage but such as afford accurate
-measurement; and an increased refinement in this respect is constantly
-called for. The degree of delicacy actually attained, we will not say
-in the most elaborate works of the highest art, but in such ordinary
-apparatus as every observer may now command, is such as could not have
-been arrived at unless in a state of the mechanical arts, which in
-its turn (such is the mutual re-action of cause and effect) requires
-for its existence a very advanced state of science. What an important
-influence may be exercised over the progress of a single branch of
-science by the invention of a ready and convenient mode of executing a
-definite measurement, and the construction and common introduction of
-an instrument adapted for it cannot be better exemplified than by the
-instance of the reflecting goniometer. This simple, cheap, and portable
-little instrument, has changed the face of mineralogy, and given it all
-the characters of one of the exact sciences.
-
-(388.) Our means of perceiving and measuring minute quantities, in the
-important relations of weight, space, and time, seem already to have
-been carried to a point which it is hardly conceivable they should
-surpass. Balances have been constructed which have rendered sensible
-the millionth part of the whole quantity weighed; and to turn with the
-thousandth part of a grain is the performance of balances pretending
-to no very extraordinary degree of merit. The elegant invention of
-the sphærometer, by substituting the sense of touch for that of sight
-in the measurement of minute objects, permits the determination of
-their dimensions with a degree of precision which is fully adequate
-to the nicest purposes of scientific enquiry. By its aid an inch may
-be readily subdivided into ten or even twenty thousand parts; and the
-lever of contact, an instrument in use among the German opticians,
-enables us to appretiate quantities of space even yet smaller. For
-the subdivision of time, too, the perfection of modern mechanism has
-furnished resources which leave very little to be desired. By the
-aid of clocks and chronometers, as they are now constructed, a few
-tenths of a second is all the error that need be apprehended in the
-subdivision of a day; and for the further subdivision of smaller
-portions of time, instruments have been imagined which admit of
-almost unlimited precision, and permit us to appreciate intervals to
-the nicety of the hundredth, or even the thousandth part of a single
-second.[59] When the precision attainable by such means is contrasted
-with what could be procured a few generations ago, by the rude and
-clumsy workmanship of even the early part of the last century, it will
-be no matter of astonishment that the sciences which depend on exact
-measurements should have made a proportional progress. Nor will any
-degree of nicety in physical determinations appear beyond our reach, if
-we consider the inexhaustible resources which science itself furnishes,
-in rendering the quantities actually to be determined by measure great
-multiples of the elements required for the purposes of theory, so as to
-diminish in the same proportion the influence of any errors which may
-be committed on the final results.
-
-(389.) Great, indeed, as have been of late the improvements in the
-construction of instruments, both as to what regards convenience and
-accuracy, it is to the discovery of improved _methods_ of observation
-that the chief progress of those parts of science which depend on
-exact determinations is owing. The balance of torsion, the ingenious
-invention of Cavendish and Coulomb, may be cited as an example of what
-we mean. By its aid we are enabled not merely to render sensible,
-but to subject to precise measurement and subdivision, degrees of
-force infinitely too feeble to affect the nicest balance of the usual
-construction, even were it possible to bring them to act on it. The
-galvanometer, too, affords another example of the same kind, in an
-instrument whose range of utility lies among electric forces which we
-have no other means of rendering sensible, much less of estimating
-with exactness. In determinations of quantities less minute in
-themselves, the methods devised by Messrs. Arago and Fresnel, for the
-measurement of the refractive powers of transparent media by means of
-the phenomenon of diffraction, may be cited as affording a degree of
-precision limited only by the wishes of the observer, and the time and
-patience he is willing to devote to his observation. And in respect of
-the direction of observations to points from which real information
-is to be obtained, and positive conclusions drawn, the hygrometer of
-Daniell may be cited as an elegant example of the introduction into
-general use of an instrument substituting an indication founded on
-strict principles for one perfectly arbitrary.
-
-(390.) In speculating on the future prospects of physical science,
-we should not be justified in leaving out of consideration the
-probability, or rather certainty, of the occasional occurrence of those
-happy accidents which have had so powerful an influence on the past;
-occasions, where a fortunate combination opportunely noticed may admit
-us in an instant to the knowledge of principles of which no suspicion
-might occur but for some such casual notice. Boyle has entitled one of
-his essays thus remarkably,--“_Of Man’s great Ignorance of the Uses
-of natural Things; or that there is no one Thing in Nature whereof
-the Uses to human Life are yet thoroughly understood_.”[60] The whole
-history of the arts since Boyle’s time has been one continued comment
-on this text; and if we regard among the uses of the works of nature,
-_that_, assuredly the noblest of all, which leads us to a knowledge
-of the Author of nature through the contemplation of the wonderful
-means by which he has wrought out his purposes in his works, the
-sciences have not been behind hand in affording their testimony to its
-truth. Nor are we to suppose that the field is in the slightest degree
-narrowed, or the chances in favour of such fortunate discoveries at all
-decreased, by those which have already taken place: on the contrary,
-they have been incalculably extended. It is true that the ordinary
-phenomena which pass before our eyes have been minutely examined, and
-those more striking and obvious principles which occur to superficial
-observation have been noticed and embodied in our systems of science;
-but, not to mention that by far the greater part of natural phenomena
-remain yet unexplained, every new discovery in science brings into
-view whole classes of facts which would never otherwise have fallen
-under our notice at all, and establishes relations which afford to
-the philosophic mind a constantly extending field of speculation,
-in ranging over which it is next to impossible that he should not
-encounter new and unexpected principles. How infinitely greater, for
-instance, are the mere chances of discovery in chemistry among the
-innumerable combinations with which the modern chemist is familiar,
-than at a period when two or three imaginary elements, and some ten
-or twenty substances, whose properties were known with an approach to
-distinctness, formed the narrow circle within which his ideas had to
-revolve? How many are the instances where a new substance, or a new
-property, introduced into familiar use, by being thus brought into
-relation with all our actual elements of knowledge, has become the
-means of developing properties and principles among the most common
-objects, which could never have otherwise been discovered? Had not
-platina (to take an instance) been an object of the most ordinary
-occurrence in a laboratory, would a suspicion have ever occurred that
-a lamp could be constructed to burn without flame; and should we have
-ever arrived at a knowledge of those curious phenomena and products of
-semi-combustion which this beautiful experiment discloses?
-
-(391.) Finally, when we look back on what has been accomplished in
-science, and compare it with what remains to be done, it is hardly
-possible to avoid being strongly impressed with the idea that we have
-been and are still executing the labour by which succeeding generations
-are to profit.[61] In a few instances only have we arrived at those
-general axiomatic laws which admit of direct deductive inference,
-and place the solutions of physical phenomena before us as so many
-problems, whose principles of solution we fully possess, and which
-require nothing but acuteness of reasoning to pursue even into their
-farthest recesses. In fewer still have we reached that command of
-abstract reasoning itself which is necessary for the accomplishment of
-so arduous a task. Science, therefore, in relation to our faculties,
-still remains boundless and unexplored, and, after the lapse of a
-century and a half from the æra of Newton’s discoveries, during which
-every department of it has been cultivated with a zeal and energy which
-have assuredly met their full return, we remain in the situation in
-which he figured himself,--standing on the shore of a wide ocean, from
-whose beach we may have culled some of those innumerable beautiful
-productions it casts up with lavish prodigality, but whose acquisition
-can be regarded as no diminution of the treasures that remain.
-
-(392.) But this consideration, so far from repressing our efforts, or
-rendering us hopeless of attaining any thing intrinsically great, ought
-rather to excite us to fresh enterprise, by the prospect of assured
-and ample recompense from that inexhaustible store which only awaits
-our continued endeavours. “It is no detraction from human capacity to
-suppose it incapable of infinite exertion, or of exhausting an infinite
-subject.”[62] In whatever state of knowledge we may conceive man to
-be placed, his progress towards a yet higher state need never fear a
-check, but must continue till the last existence of society.
-
-(393.) It is in this respect an advantageous view of science, which
-refers all its advances to the discovery of general laws, and to
-the inclusion of what is already known in generalizations of still
-higher orders; inasmuch as this view of the subject represents it, as
-it really is, essentially incomplete, and incapable of being fully
-embodied in any system, or embraced by any single mind. Yet it must be
-recollected that, so far as our experience has hitherto gone, every
-advance towards generality has at the same time been a step towards
-simplification. It is only when we are wandering and lost in the mazes
-of particulars, or entangled in fruitless attempts to work our way
-downwards in the thorny paths of applications, to which our reasoning
-powers are incompetent, that nature appears complicated:--the moment we
-contemplate it as it is, and attain a position from which we can take a
-commanding view, though but of a small part of its plan, we never fail
-to recognise that sublime simplicity on which the mind rests satisfied
-that it has attained the truth.
-
-
-
-
-INDEX.
-
-
- Acoustics cultivated by Pythagoras and Aristotle, page 248.
-
- Æpinus, his laws of equilibrium of electricity, 332.
-
- Aëriform fluids, liquids kept in a state of vapour, 321.
-
- Agricola, George, his knowledge of mineralogy and metallurgy, 112.
-
- Air, compressibility and elasticity of; limitation to the repulsive
- tendency of, 226.
- Weight of, unknown to the ancients, 228.
- First perceived by Galileo, 228.
- Proved by a crucial instance, 229.
- Equilibrium of, established, 231.
- Dilatation of, by heat, 319.
-
- Air-pump, discovery of, 230.
-
- Airy, his experiments in Dolcoath mine, 187.
-
- Alchemists, advantages derived from, 11.
-
- Algebra, 19.
-
- Ampere, his electro-dynamic theory, 202.
- Utility of, 203, 324.
-
- Analysis of force, 86.
- Of motion, 87.
- Of complex phenomena, 88.
-
- Anaxagoras, philosophy of, 107.
-
- Animal electricity, 337.
-
- Arago, M., his experiment with a magnetic needle and a plate of
- copper, 157.
-
- Archimedes, his practical application of science, 72.
- His knowledge of hydrostatics, 231.
-
- Arfwedson, his discovery of lithia, 158.
-
- Aristotle, his knowledge of natural history, 109.
- His works condemned, and subsequently studied with avidity, 111.
- His philosophy overturned by the discoveries of Copernicus, Kepler,
- and Galileo, 113.
-
- Arithmetic, 19.
-
- Art, empirical and scientific, differences between, 71.
- Remarks on the language, terms, or signs, used in treating of
- it, 70.
-
- Assurances, life, utility and abuses of, 58.
-
- Astronomy, cause of the slow progress of our knowledge of, 78.
- Theory and practical observations distinct in, 132.
- An extensive acquaintance with science and every branch of knowledge
- necessary to make a perfect observer in, 132.
- Five primary planets added to our system, 274.
- Positions, figures, and dimensions of all the planetary orbits now
- well known, 275.
-
- Atomic theory, 305.
- Advantage of, 306.
-
- Atomic weights of chemical elements, 306.
-
- Attraction, capillary, or capillarity, investigated by Laplace and
- Young, 234.
-
-
- Bacon, celebrated in England for his knowledge of science, 72.
- Benefits conferred on Natural Philosophy by him, 104.
- His Novum Organum, 105.
- His reform in philosophy proves the paramount importance of
- induction, 114.
- His prerogative of facts, 181.
- Illustrated by the fracture of a crystallized substance, 183.
- His collective instances, 184.
- Importance of, 185.
- His experiment on the weight of bodies, 186.
- Travelling instances of, frontier instances of, 188.
- His difference between liquids and aëriform fluids, 233.
-
- Bartolin, Erasmus, first discovers the phenomena exhibited by doubly
- refracting crystals, 254.
-
- Beccher, phlogistic doctrines of, 300.
-
- Bergmann, his advancement in crystallography, 239.
-
- Bernoulli, experiments of, in hydrodynamical science, 181.
-
- Biot, his hypothesis of a rotatory motion of the particles of light
- about their axes, 262.
-
- Black, Dr., his discovery of latent heat, 322.
-
- Bode, his curious law observed in the progression of the magnitudes of
- the several planetary orbits, 308.
-
- Bodies, natural constitution of, 221.
- Division of, into crystallized and uncrystallized, 242.
-
- Bones, dry, a magazine of nutriment, 65.
-
- Borda, his invention for subdivision, 128.
-
- Botany, general utility of, 345.
-
- Boyle, Robert, his enthusiasm in the pursuit of science, 115.
- His improvement on the air-pump, 230.
-
- Brain, hypothesis of its being an electric pile, 343.
-
- Bramah’s press, principle and utility of, 233.
-
- Brewster, Dr., his improvement on lenses for lighthouses, 56.
- His researches prove that the phenomena exhibited by polarized
- light, in its transmission through crystals, afford a certain
- indication of the most important points relating to the
- structure of crystals themselves, 263.
-
-
- Cabot, Sebastian, his discovery of the variation of the needle, 327.
-
- Cagnard, Baron de la Tour, utility of his experiments, 234.
-
- Causes and consequences directors of the will of man, 6.
-
- Causes, proximate, discovery of, called by Newton _veræ causæ_, 144.
-
- Celestial mechanics, 265.
-
- Chaldean records, 265.
-
- Chemistry furnishes causes of sudden action, also fulminating
- compositions, 62.
- Analogy of the complex phenomena of, with those of physics, 92.
- Benefits arising from the analysis of, 94.
- Axioms of, analogous to those of geometry, 95.
- Many of the new elements of, detected in the investigation of
- residual phenomena, 158.
- The most general law of, 209.
- Illustration of, 210.
- Between fifty and sixty elements in, 211.
- Objects of, 296.
- General heads of the principal improvements in, 302.
- Remarks on those general heads, 304.
-
- Chemistry, Stahlian, cause of the mistakes and confusions of, 123.
-
- Chladni, experiments of, in dynamical science, 181.
-
- Chlorine, disinfectant powers of, 56.
-
- Clarke, Dr., his experiments on the arseniate and phosphate
- of soda, 170.
- His success in producing a new phosphate of soda, 171.
-
- Climate, change of, in large tracts of the globe, alleged
- cause of, 145.
-
- Coals, power of a bushel of, properly consumed, 59.
- Quantity consumed in London, 60.
-
- Cohesion, an ultimate phenomenon, 90.
-
- Cold, qualities of, 318.
-
- Compass, mariner’s, 55.
-
- Condensation, a source of heat, 313.
-
- Conduction of heat, laws of, 205.
-
- Copernicus, effect of his discoveries on the Aristotelian
- philosophy, 113.
- Objections to his astronomical doctrines, 269.
-
- Crystallography, laws of, 123, 239.
- A determinate figure supposed to be common to all the particles of a
- crystal, 242.
-
-
- D’Alembert, his improvements in hydrodynamics, 236.
-
- Dalton, his announcement of the atomic theory, 305.
- His examination of gases and vapours, 319.
-
- Davy, Sir H., brings the voltaic pile to bear upon the earths and
- alkalies, 339.
-
- Deduction, utility of, 174.
-
- De l’Isle, Romé, his study of crystalline bodies, 239.
-
- Dew, causes of, investigated, 159.
- Effects of, on different substances, 160.
- Objects capable of contracting it, 161.
- A cloudless sky favourable to its production, 162.
- General proximate cause of, 163.
-
- Drummond, lieutenant, his improvement on lenses for lamps of
- lighthouses, 56.
-
- Dynamics, importance of, 96, 223.
-
-
- Earth, the orbit of,--diminution of its eccentricity round
- the sun, 147.
-
- Economy, political, 73.
-
- Egypt, great pyramid of, height, weight, and ground occupied by
- it, 60.
- Accuracy of the astronomical records of, 265.
-
- Elasticity, an ultimate phenomenon, 90.
-
- Electricity may be the cause of magnetism, 93.
- Universality of, 329.
- Effects of, 330.
- Activity of, 331.
- Equilibrium of, 332.
- Productive of chemical decomposition, 338.
-
- Empirical laws, 178.
- Evils resulting from, 179.
-
- Encke, professor, his prediction of the return of the comet so many
- times in succession, 156.
-
- Englefield, sir H., his analysis of a solar beam, 314.
-
- Equilibrium maintained by force, 222.
-
- Erman, professor, his opinion of the effects of the voltaic
- circuit, 340.
-
- Euler, his improvement on Newton’s theory of sound, 247.
-
- Experience, source of our knowledge of nature’s laws, 76.
-
- Experiment, a means of acquiring experience, 76.
- Utility of, 151.
-
-
- Facts, the observation of, 118.
-
- Faujas de St. Fond, imaginary craters of, 131.
-
- Fluids, laws of the motion of, 181.
- Compressibility of, 225.
- Consideration of the motions of, more complicated than that of
- equilibrium, 235.
-
- Force, analysis of, 86.
- The cause of motion, 149.
- Phenomena of, 221.
- Molecular forces, 245.
-
- Fourier, baron, his opinion that the celestial regions have a
- temperature, independent of the sun, not greatly inferior
- to that at which quicksilver congeals, 157.
- His analysis of the laws of conduction and radiation of heat, 317.
-
- Franklin, Dr., his experiments on electricity, 332.
-
- Fresnel, M., his mathematical explanation of the phenomena of double
- refraction, 32.
- His improvement on lenses for lamps of lighthouses, 56.
- His opinions on the nature of light, 207.
- His experiments on the interference of polarized light, 261.
- His theory of polarization, 262.
-
- Friction, a source of heat, 313.
-
-
- Galileo, celebrity of, for his knowledge of science, 72.
- His exposition of the Aristotelian philosophy, 110.
- His refutation of Aristotle’s dogmas respecting motion, his
- persecution in consequence of it, 113.
- His knowledge of the accelerating power of gravity, 168.
- His knowledge of the weight of the atmosphere, 228.
-
- Galvani, utility of his discoveries in electricity, 335.
- His application of it to animals, 336.
-
- Gay-Lussac, his examination of gases and vapours, 319.
-
- Generalization, inductive, 1, 90.
-
- Geology, 281.
- Its rank as a science, 287.
-
- Geometry, axioms of, an appeal to experience, not corporeal, but
- mental, 95.
-
- Gilbert, Dr., of Colchester, his knowledge of magnetism and
- electricity, 112.
-
- Gravitation, law of, a physical axiom of a very high and universal
- kind, 98.
- Influence of, decreases in the inverse ratio of the square of the
- distance, 123.
-
- Greece, philosophers of, their extraordinary success in abstract
- reasoning, and their careless consideration of external
- nature, 105.
- Their general character, 106.
- Philosophy of, 108.
-
- Grimaldi, a jesuit of Bologna, his discovery of diffraction, or
- inflection of light, 252.
-
- Guinea and feather experiment, 168.
-
- Gunpowder, invention of, 55.
- A mechanical agent, 62.
-
-
- Haarlem lake, draining of, 61.
-
- Harmony, sense of, 248.
-
- Head, captain, anecdote of, 84.
-
- Heat, 193.
- Radiation and conduction of, 205.
- One of the chief agents in chemistry, 310.
- Our ignorance of the nature of, 310.
- Abuse of the sense of the term, 311.
- The general heads under which it is studied, 312.
- Its most obvious sources, 312.
- Animal heat, to what process referable, 313.
- Radiation and conduction of, 314.
- Solar heat differs from terrestrial fires, or hot bodies, 315.
- Principal effects of, 317.
- The antagonist to mutual attraction, 322.
- Latent heat, 322.
- Specific heat, 323.
-
- Herschel, sir William, his analysis of a solar beam, 314.
-
- Hipparchus, his catalogue of stars, 276.
-
- Holland drained of water by windmills, 61.
-
- Hooke almost the rival of Newton, 116.
-
- Huel Towan, steam-engine at, 59.
-
- Huyghens, his doctrine of light, 207.
- Ascertains the laws of double refraction, 254.
-
- Hydrostatics, first step towards a knowledge of, made by
- Archimedes, 231.
- Law of the equal pressure of liquids, 232.
- General applicability of, 232.
-
- Hypothesis, not to be deterred from framing them, 196.
- Conditions on which they should be framed, 197.
- Illustrated by the laws of gravitation, 198.
- Use and abuse of, 204.
-
-
- Induction, different ways of carrying it on, 102.
- Steps by which it is arrived at on a legitimate and extensive
- scale, 118.
- First stage of, 144.
- Verification of, 164.
- Instanced in astronomy, 166.
- Must be followed into all its consequences, and applied to all those
- cases which seem even remotely to bear upon the subject of
- enquiry, 173.
- Nature of the inductions by which quantitative laws are arrived
- at, 176.
- Necessity of induction embracing a series of cases which absolutely
- include the whole scale of variation of which the quantities
- in question admit, 177.
-
- Induced electricity, 333.
-
- Inertia, 223.
-
- Iodine, discovery of, 50.
- Efficacy of, in curing goître, 51.
-
- Isomorphism, law of, 170.
-
-
- Kepler, effect of his discoveries on the Aristotelian philosophy, 113.
- Nature of his laws of the planetary system, 178.
- Proofs of the Newtonian system, 179.
-
- Knowledge, physical facts illustrative of the utility of, 45.
- Diffusion of, how to take advantage of in the investigation of
- nature, 138.
-
-
- Lagrange, his improvements on Newton’s theory of sound, 247.
- His astronomical researches, 275.
-
- Lamp, safety, 55.
-
- Laplace, his explanation of the residual velocity of sound and
- confirmation of the general law of the developement of heat
- by compression, 172.
- His astronomical research, 275.
- His experiments on the dilatation of bodies by heat, 319.
- His study of specific heat, 323.
- Latent heat, 323.
-
- Laws, inductive, 171.
- General, 198.
- How applicable, 199.
- Illustrated by the planetary system, 201.
- Empirical laws, 178.
-
- Lavoisier, his improvements in chemical science, 302.
- Experiments on dilatation of bodies by heat, 319.
- His investigation on specific heat, 323.
-
- Light, refraction of, 30.
- Double refraction of, 31.
- Polarization of, 254.
-
- Light and vision, ignorance of the ancients respecting, 249.
-
- Lighthouse, 56.
-
- Lightning, how to judge philosophically of it, 120.
- Returning stroke of, 121.
-
- Liquids, cohesion, attraction and repulsion of the particles of, 227.
- Differ from aëriform fluids by their cohesion, 233.
- The Florentine experiment on; experiments by Canton, Perkins,
- Oërsted, and others on, 235.
- Obscurity of the laws of dilatation of, 320.
-
- Linnæus, his knowledge of crystalline substances, 239.
-
- Logic, 19.
-
- Lyell’s Principles of Geology, extract from, 146.
-
-
- Magnetism may be caused by electricity, 93.
- Offers a “glaring instance” of polarity, 326.
- Experiments illustrative of, 327.
-
- Malus, a French officer of engineers, discovers the polarization of
- light, 132, 258.
-
- Man, regarded as a creature of instinct, 1.
- Of reason and speculation, 3.
- His will determined by causes and consequences, 6.
- Advantages to, from the study of science, 7.
- His necessity to study the laws of nature illustrated, 66.
- Happiness and the opposite state of man in the aggregate, 67.
- Advantages conferred on, by the augmentation of physical
- resources, 68.
- Advantages from intellectual resources, 69.
-
- Mariotte, his law of equilibrium of an elastic fluid recently verified
- by the Royal Academy of Paris, 231.
- His difference between solar and other heat, 315.
-
- Matter, indestructibility of; Divided by grinding, 40.
- By fire, 41.
- Dilated by heat, 193.
- Inertia of, 202.
- Polarity of, one of the ultimate phenomena to which the analysis of
- nature leads us, 245.
- Inherent activity of, 297.
- Causes of the polarity of, 299.
- Imponderable forms of, 310.
-
- Measure, the standard, difficulty of preserving it unaltered, 128.
- How to be assisted in measurement, 129.
- Our conclusions from, should be conditional, 130.
-
- Menai Bridge, weight and height of, 60.
-
- Mechanics, practical, 63.
-
- Mètre, the French, 126.
-
- Microscopes, power of, 191.
-
- Millstones, method of making in France, 48.
-
- Mind, its transition from the little to the great, and _vice versâ_,
- illustrated, 172.
-
- Mineralogy unknown to the ancients, 79.
- Prejudiced by the rage for nomenclature, 139.
- Benefited by the progress of chemical analysis, 293.
-
- Minerals, simple, apparent paucity of, 294.
- Difficulty in classing them, 295.
-
- Mitscherlich, his law of isomorphism, 170.
- His experiments on the expansion of substances by heat, 243.
-
- Motion, 87.
- Simplicity and precision of the laws of, 179.
-
-
- Nature, laws of, 37.
- Immutability of, 42.
- Harmony of, and advantage of studying them, 43.
- Prove the impossibility of attaining the declared object of the
- alchemist. How they serve mankind generally, 44.
- Illustrated by mining, 45.
- Economy derived from a knowledge of, 65.
- How to be regarded, 100, 101.
-
- Nature, objects of, an enumeration and nomenclature of, useful in the
- study of, 135.
- Mechanism of, on too large or too small a scale to be immediately
- cognisable by our senses, 191.
-
- Newton, his proof of Galileo’s laws of gravitation by an experiment
- with a hollow glass pendulum, 160.
- His foundation to hydrodynamical science, 181.
- Fixes the division between statics and dynamics, 223.
- His investigation of the law of equilibrium of elastic fluids, 231.
- His law of hydrostatics, 232.
- His foundation of hydrodynamics 236.
- His analysis of sound, 247.
- Hypothesis of light, 250.
- Examination of a soap-bubble, 252.
- His hypothesis of fits of easy transmission and reflection, 253.
- His combination of mathematical skill with physical research, 271.
- His Principia, 272.
- His successors; his geometry, 273.
-
- Nomenclature, importance of, to science, 136.
- More a consequence than a cause of extended knowledge, 138.
- Prejudicial to mineralogy, 139.
-
- Norman, Robert, his discovery of the dip of the needle, 327.
-
- Numerical precision, necessity of, in science, 122.
-
-
- Objects, and their mutual actions, subjects of contemplation, 118.
-
- Observation, a means of acquiring experience, 76.
- Passive and active, 77.
- Recorded observation, 120.
- Necessity of, to acquire precise physical data, 215.
- Illustrated by the barometer, 216.
-
- Oërsted, his discoveries in electricity and magnetism, 132.
- Of electro-magnetism, 340.
-
- Opacity, 189.
-
- Otto von Guericke of Magdeburgh, his invention of the air-pump, 230.
-
-
- Paracelsus, power of his chemical remedies; his use of mercury,
- opium, and tartar, 112.
-
- Pascal, his crucial instances proving the weight of air, 229.
-
- Pendulum, 126.
-
- Phenomena, analysis of, illustrated by musical sounds, the sensation
- of taste, 85.
- The ultimate and inward process of nature in the production of, 86.
- Analysis of complex phenomena, 88.
- Ultimate phenomena, 90.
- How the analysis of, is useful, 97.
- A transient phenomenon, how to judge of, 122.
- Method of explaining one when it presents itself, 148.
- How to discover the cause of one, 150.
- Two, or many, theories, maintained as the origin of, in
- physics, 195.
- Cosmical phenomena, 265.
-
- Philosophy, natural, unfounded objections to the study of, 7.
- Advantages derivable from the study of, 10.
- Pleasure and happiness, the consequences of the study of, 15.
-
- Phlogistic doctrines of Beccher and Stahl, 300.
-
- Physical data, necessity of, 209.
- Great importance of, 211.
- Illustrated by the erection of observatories, 213.
- Necessity of an exact knowledge of, 214.
- More precise than the observations by which we acquire them, 215.
-
- Physics, axioms of; analysis of, 102.
-
- Planets, circumjovial, 186.
-
- Platina, discovery of, 308.
-
- Pliny, his knowledge of quartz and diamond, 239.
-
- Pneumatics, 228.
-
- Political economy, 73.
-
- Prejudices of opinion and sense, 80.
- Conditions on which such are injurious, 81.
- Illustrated by the division of the rays of light, by the moon at the
- horizon, and by ventriloquism, 82.
- By the transition of the hand from heat to cold, 83.
-
- Prevost, M., his theory of heat, 316.
- His theory of reciprocal interchanges, a proof of the radiation
- of cold, 318.
-
- Printing, the art of, 193.
- Performed by steam, 194.
-
- Probabilities, doctrine of, 217.
- Illustrated by shooting at a wafer, 218.
-
- Prout, Dr., his opinion of the atomic weights, 307.
-
- Pyrometry, 319.
-
- Pythagoras, philosophy of, 107.
-
-
- Quinine, sulphate of, comparative comfort and health resulting from
- the use of, 56.
-
-
- Radiation of heat, laws of, 205.
-
- Repulsion in fluids and solids, 227.
-
- Rules, general, for guiding and facilitating our search among a great
- mass of assembled facts, 151.
-
- Rumford, count, experiments of, on gunpowder, 62.
-
-
- Savart, M., his experiments on solids, 243.
- His researches on sound, 249.
-
- Science, abstract, a preparation for the study of physics, 19.
- Not indispensable to the study of physical laws, 25.
- Instances illustrative of, 27.
-
- Science, physical, nature and objects, immediate and collateral, as
- regarded in itself and in its application to the practical
- purposes of life, and its influence on society, 35.
- State of, previous to the age of Galileo and Bacon, 104.
- Causes of the rapid advance of, compared with the progress at an
- earlier period, 347.
-
- Science, natural, cause and effect, the ultimate relations of, 76.
-
- Sciences and Arts, remarks on the language, terms, or signs used in
- treating of them, 70.
- Receive an impulse by the Baconian philosophy, 114.
-
- Sensation, cause of, 91.
-
- Senses, inadequate to give us direct information for the exact
- comparison of quantity, 124.
- Substitutes for the inefficiency of, 125.
-
- Seringapatam, method of breaking blocks from the quarries of, 47.
-
- Shells found in rocks at a great height above the sea, supposed
- cause of, 145.
-
- Smeaton, his experiments on bodies dilated by heat, 319.
-
- Solids, transparent, exhibit periodical colours when exposed to
- polarized light, 99.
- Influence of, on the Mind, 101.
-
- Solids in general, nature of, 236.
- Constitution of, complicated, 237.
- Toughness of, distinct from hardness; tenacity of, 238.
- Become liquefied by the addition of heat, 321.
-
- Sounds, musical, illustrative of the analysis of phenomena, 85.
- Means of having a knowledge of, 89.
- Propagation of, through the air, 246.
- Newton’s analysis of, 247.
-
- Standard measurement, necessity of, 125.
- Laws of nature used as such, illustrated by the rotation of the
- earth, 126.
-
- Substances all subject to dilatation by the addition of heat, 243.
-
- Sun, the character of the heat of, 315.
-
-
- Thales, philosophy of, 107.
-
- Theories, how to estimate the value of, 204.
- Best arrived at by the consideration of general laws, 208.
- Explanatory of the phenomena of nature; on what their application
- ought to be grounded, 209.
-
- Thomson, Dr., his opinion of the atomic weights, 307.
-
- Thermometer, air, 319.
-
- Thermo-electricity, 341.
-
- Time, division of, 126, 127.
-
- Torricelli, pupil of Galileo, his experiments proving the weight of
- atmosphere, 229.
-
- Torpedo, shock of, 341, 342.
-
-
- Ulugh Begh, his catalogue of stars, 277.
-
-
- Vaccination, success of, as a preventive to small-pox, 52.
-
- Vision and light, ignorance of the ancients respecting, 249.
-
- Volta, his discoveries in electricity, 335.
- Electric pile of, 337.
-
- Voltaic circuit, 338.
-
-
- Water, effects of the power of, 61.
-
- Whewell, his experiments, 187.
-
- Wells, Dr., his theory of dew, 163.
-
- Wind, effects of the power of, 61.
-
- Wire steel, magnetized masks of, used by needle-makers, 57.
-
- Wollaston, Dr., his verification of the laws of double refraction in
- Iceland spar, 258.
- His invention of the goniometer, 292.
-
- World, the materials of the, 290.
-
-
- Young, Dr., his experiments on the interference of the rays of
- light, 260.
-
-
- Zoology, fossil, 344.
-
-
-THE END.
-
-
- LONDON
- PRINTED BY SPOTTISWOODE AND CO.
- NEW-STREET SQUARE.
-
-
-
-
-FOOTNOTES
-
-
-[1] Hooke’s Posthumous Works. Lond. 1705.--p. 472 and p. 458.
-
-[2] Wealth of Nations, book i. chap. i. p. 15.
-
-[3] On this subject, we cannot forbear citing a passage from one of
-the most profound but at the same time popular writers of our time, on
-a subject unconnected it is true with our own, but bearing strongly
-on the point before us. “But, if science be manifestly incomplete,
-and yet of the highest importance, it would surely be most unwise
-to restrain enquiry, conducted on just principles, even where the
-immediate practical utility of it was not visible. In mathematics,
-chemistry, and every branch of natural philosophy, how many are the
-enquiries necessary for their improvement and completion, which, taken
-separately, do not appear to lead to any specifically advantageous
-purpose! how many useful inventions, and how much valuable and
-improving knowledge, would have been lost, if a rational curiosity,
-and a mere love of information, had not generally been allowed to be a
-sufficient motive for the search after truth!”--Malthus’s Principles of
-Political Economy, p. 16.
-
-[4] Λογος, _ratio_, reason.
-
-[5] Λογος, _verbum_, a word.
-
-[6] It were much to be wished that navigators would be more cautious in
-laying themselves open to a similar censure. On looking hastily over
-a map of the world we see three Melville Islands, two King George’s
-Sounds, and Cape Blancos innumerable.
-
-[7] Young. Lectures on Nat. Phil. ii. 627. See also Phil. Trans. 1801-2.
-
-[8] Captain Basil Hall, R. N.
-
-[9] We must caution our readers who would assure themselves of it by
-trial, that it is an experiment of some delicacy, and not to be made
-without several precautions to ensure success. For these we must refer
-to our original authority (Fresnel. Mémoire sur la Diffraction de la
-Lumiere, p. 124.); and the principles on which they depend will of
-course be detailed in that volume of the Cabinet Cyclopædia which is
-devoted to the subject of LIGHT.
-
-[10] Little reels used in cotton mills to twist the thread.
-
-[11] Such a block would weigh between four and five hundred thousand
-pounds. See Dr. Kennedy’s “Account of the Erection of a Granite Obelisk
-of a Single Stone about Seventy Feet high, at Seringapatam.”--_Ed.
-Phil. Trans._ vol. ix, p. 312.
-
-[12] Dr. Coindet of Geneva.
-
-[13] Journal of a Voyage to the South Seas, &c. &c. under the Command
-of Commodore George Anson, in 1740-1744, by Pascoe Thomas, Lond. 1745,
-So tremendous were the ravages of scurvy, that, in the year 1726,
-admiral Hosier sailed with seven ships of the line to the West Indies,
-and buried his ships’ companies twice, and died himself in consequence
-of a broken heart. Dr. Johnson, in the year 1778, could describe a
-sea-life in such terms as these:--“As to the sailor, when you look down
-from the quarter deck to the space below, you see the utmost extremity
-of human misery, such crowding, such filth, such stench!”--“A ship is
-a prison with the chance of being drowned--it is worse--worse in every
-respect--worse room, worse air, worse food--worse company!” Smollet,
-who had personal experience of the horrors of a seafaring life in those
-days, gives a lively picture of them in his Roderick Random.
-
-[14] Lemon juice was known to be a remedy for scurvy far superior
-to all others 200 years ago, as appears by the writings of Woodall.
-His work is entitled “The Surgeon’s Mate, or Military and Domestic
-Medicine. By John Woodall, Master in Surgery London, 1636,” p. 165. In
-1600, Commodore Lancaster sailed from England with three other ships
-for the Cape of Good Hope, on the 2d of April, and arrived in Saldanha
-Bay on the 1st of August, the commodore’s own ship being in perfect
-health, from the administration of three table-spoonsfull of lemon
-juice every morning to each of his men, whereas the other ships were so
-sickly as to be unmanageable for want of hands, and the commander was
-obliged to send men on board to take in their sails and hoist out their
-boats. (Purchas’s Pilgrim, vol. i. p. 149.) A Fellow of the college,
-and an eminent practitioner, in 1753 published a tract on sea scurvy,
-in which he adverts to the superior virtue of this medicine; and Mr. A.
-Baird, surgeon of the Hector sloop of war, states, that from what he
-had seen of its effects on board of that ship, he “thinks he shall not
-be accused of presumption in pronouncing it, if properly administered,
-a _most infallible remedy_, both in the cure and prevention of
-scurvy.” (Vide Trotter’s Medicina Nautica.) The precautions adopted
-by captain Cook in his celebrated voyages, had fully demonstrated by
-their complete success the practicability of keeping scurvy under in
-the longest voyages, but a uniform system of prevention throughout the
-service was still deficient.
-
-It is to the representations of Dr. Blair and sir Gilbert Blane, in
-their capacity of commissioners of the board for sick and wounded
-seamen, in 1795, we believe, that its _systematic introduction into
-nautical diet_, by a general order of the admiralty, is owing. The
-effect of this wise measure (taken, of course, in conjunction with the
-general causes of improved health,) may be estimated from the following
-facts:--In 1780, the number of cases of scurvy received into Haslar
-hospital was 1457; in 1806 _one_ only, and in 1807 _one_. There are now
-many surgeons in the navy who have never seen the disease.
-
-[15] Throughout France the conductor is recognised as a most
-valuable and useful instrument; and in those parts of Germany where
-thunder-storms are still more common and tremendous they are become
-nearly universal. In Munich there is hardly a modern house unprovided
-with them, and of a much better construction than ours--several copper
-wires twisted into a rope.
-
-[16] We have been informed by an eminent physician in Rome, (Dr.
-Morichini) that a vast quantity of the sulphate of quinine is
-manufactured there and consumed in the Campagna, with an evident effect
-in mitigating the severity of the malarious complaints which affect its
-inhabitants.
-
-[17] Dr. Johnson, Memoirs of the Medical Society, vol. v.
-
-[18] The engine at Huel Towan. See Mr. Henwood’s Statement “of the
-performance of steam-engines in Cornwall for April, May, and June,
-1829.” Brewster’s Journal, Oct. 1829.--The _highest_ monthly average of
-this engine extends to 79 millions of pounds.
-
-[19] However, this is not quite a fair statement; a man’s daily labour
-is about 4 lbs. of coals. The extreme toil of this ascent arises from
-other obvious causes than the mere height.
-
-[20] Its surface is about 40,000 acres, and medium depth about 20 feet.
-It was proposed to drain it by running embankments across it, and thus
-cutting it up into more manageable portions to be drained by windmills.
-
-[21] No one doubts the _practicability_ of the undertaking. Eight or
-nine thousand chaldrons of coals duly burnt would evacuate the whole
-contents. But many doubt whether it would be profitable, and some,
-considering that a few hundreds of fishermen who gain their livelihood
-on its waters would be dispossessed, deny that it would be _desirable_.
-
-[22] “Experiments to determine the Force of fired Gunpowder.” Phil.
-Trans. vol. lxxxvii. p. 254. et seq.
-
-[23] See a very ingenious application of this kind in Mr. Babbage’s
-article on Diving in the Encyc. Metrop.--Others will readily suggest
-themselves. For instance, the ballast in reserve of a balloon might
-consist of materials capable of evolving great quantities of hydrogen
-gas in proportion to their weight, should such be found.
-
-[24] The sulphuric. Bracconot, Annales de Chimie, vol. xii. p. 184.
-
-[25] D’Arcet, Annales de l’Industrie, Fevrier, 1829.
-
-[26] See Dr. Prout’s account of the experiments of professor Autenrieth
-of Tubingen. Phil. Trans. 1827, p. 381. This discovery, which renders
-famine next to _impossible_, deserves a higher degree of celebrity than
-it has obtained.
-
-[27] Greenwich.
-
-[28] Maskelyne’s.
-
-[29] Thomson’s First Principles of Chemistry, vol. ii. p. 68.
-
-[30] Galileo exposes unsparingly the Aristotelian style of reasoning.
-The reader may take the following from him as a specimen of its
-quality. The object is to prove the immutability and incorruptibility
-of the heavens; and thus it is done:--
-
- I. Mutation is either generation or corruption.
-
- II. Generation and corruption only happen between contraries.
-
- III. The motions of contraries are contrary.
-
- IV. The celestial motions are circular.
-
- V. Circular motions have no contraries.
-
- α. Because there can be but three simple motions.
- 1. To a centre.
- 2. Round a centre.
- 3. From a centre.
-
- β. Of three things, one only can be contrary to one.
-
- γ. But a motion to a centre is manifestly the contrary to a
- motion from a centre.
-
- δ. Therefore a motion _round_ a centre (_i. e._ a circular
- motion) remains without a contrary.
-
- VI. _Therefore_ celestial motions have no contraries--_therefore_
- among celestial _things_ there are no contraries--_therefore_
- the heavens are eternal, immutable, incorruptible, and so forth.
-
-It is evident that all this string of nonsense depends on the excessive
-vagueness of the notions of generation, corruption, contrariety, &c. on
-which the changes are rung.--_See_ GALILEO, _Systema Cosmicum_, Dial.
-i. p. 30.
-
-[31] Macquer justly observes, that the alchemists would have rendered
-essential service to chemistry had they only related their unsuccessful
-experiments as clearly as they have obscurely related those which they
-pretend to have been successful.--_Macquer’s Dictionary of Chemistry_,
-i. x.
-
-[32] Paracelsus performed most of these cures by mercury and opium,
-the use of which latter drug he had learned in Turkey. Of mercurial
-preparations the physicians of his time were ignorant, and of opium
-they were afraid, as being “cold in the fourth degree.” Tartar was
-likewise a great favourite of Paracelsus, who imposed on it that name,
-“because it contains the water, the salt, the oil, and the acid, which
-burn the patient as hell does:” in short, a kind of counterbalance to
-his opium.
-
-[33] See the Life of Galileo Galilei, by Mr. Drinkwater, with
-Illustrations of the Advancement of Experimental Philosophy.
-
-[34] The temporary star in Cassiopeia observed by Cornelius Gemma, in
-1572, was so bright as to be seen at noon-day. That in Serpentarius,
-first seen by Kepler in 1604, exceeded in brilliancy all the other
-stars and planets.
-
-[35] Edinburgh Phil. Journ. 1819, vol. i. p. 8.
-
-[36] The abstract principle of repetition in matters of measurement
-(viz. juxta-position of units without error) is applicable to a great
-variety of cases in which quantities are required to be determined to
-minute nicety. In chemistry, in determining the standard atomic weights
-of bodies, it seems easily and completely applicable, by a process
-which will suggest itself at once to every chemist, and seems the only
-thing wanting to place the exactness of chemical determinations on a
-par with astronomical measurements.
-
-[37] Accurate and _perfectly_ authentic copies of the yard and pound,
-executed in platina, and hermetically sealed in glass, should be
-deposited deep in the interior of the massive stone-work of some great
-public building, whence they could only be rescued with a degree
-of difficulty sufficient to preclude their being disturbed unless
-on some very high and urgent occasion. The fact should be publicly
-recorded, and its memory preserved by an inscription. Indeed, how much
-valuable and useful information of the actual existing state of arts
-and knowledge at any period might be transmitted to posterity in a
-distinct, tangible, and imperishable form, if, instead of the absurd
-and useless deposition of a few coins and medals under the foundations
-of buildings, specimens of ingenious implements or condensed statements
-of scientific truths, or processes in arts and manufactures, were
-substituted. Will books infallibly preserve to a remote posterity all
-that we may desire should be hereafter known of ourselves and our
-discoveries, or all that posterity would wish to know? and may not a
-useless ceremony be thus transformed into an act of enrolment in a
-perpetual archive of what we most prize, and acknowledge to be most
-valuable?
-
-[38] In the system alluded to, the name of quartz is assigned to
-iolite and obsidian; that of mica to plumbago, chlorite, and uranite;
-sulphur, to orpiment and realgar, &c. See Mohs’s System of Mineralogy,
-translated by Haidinger.
-
-[39] The following passage, from Lindley’s Synopsis of the British
-Flora, characterises justly the respective merits, in a philosophical
-point of view, of natural and artificial systems of classification
-in general, though limited in its expression to his own immediate
-science:--“After all that has been effected, or is likely to be
-accomplished hereafter, there will always be more difficulty in
-acquiring a knowledge of the natural system of botany than of the
-Linnæan. The latter skims only the surface of things, and leaves the
-student in the fancied possession of a sort of information which it is
-easy enough to obtain, but which is of little value when acquired: the
-former requires a minute investigation of every part and every property
-known to exist in plants; but when understood has conveyed to the mind
-a store of real information, of the utmost use to man in every station
-of life. Whatever the difficulties may be of becoming acquainted with
-plants according to this method, they are inseparable from botany,
-which cannot be usefully studied without encountering them.” Schiller
-has some beautiful lines on this, entitled “Menschliches Wissen” (or
-Human Knowledge); Gedichte, vol. i. p. 72. Leipzig, 1800.
-
-[40] Lyell’s Principles of Geology, vol. i. Fourrier, Mém. de l’Acad.
-des Sciences, tom. vii. p. 592. “L’établissement et le progrès des
-sociétés humaines, l’action des forces naturelles, peuvent changer
-notablement, et dans de vastes contrées, l’état de la surface du sol,
-la distribution des eaux, et les grands mouvemens de l’air. De tels
-effets sont propres à faire varier, dans le cours de plusieurs siècles,
-le dégré de la chaleur moyenne; car les expressions analytiques
-comprennent des coefficiens qui se rapportent à l’état superficiel,
-et qui influent beaucoup sur la valeur de la température.” In this
-enumeration, by M. Fourrier, of causes which may vary the general
-relation of the surface of extensive continents to heat, it is but
-justice to Mr. Lyell to observe, that the gradual shifting of the
-_places_ of the continents themselves on the surface of the globe,
-by the abrading action of the sea on the one hand, and the elevating
-agency of subterranean forces on the other, does not expressly occur
-and cannot be fairly included in the general sense of the passage,
-which confines itself to the consideration of such changes as may take
-place on the existing surface of the land.
-
-[41] The reader will find this subject further developed in a paper
-lately communicated to the Geological Society.
-
-[42] Phil. Trans. 1824.
-
-[43] Wells on Dew.
-
-[44] Principia, book iii. prop. 6.
-
-[45] A very curious instance of the pursuit of a law completely
-empirical into an extreme case is to be found in Newton’s rule for
-the dilatation of his coloured rings seen between glasses at great
-obliquities. Optics, book ii. part i. obs. 7.
-
-[46] See Phil. Trans. 1819.
-
-[47] “When we are told that Saturn moves in his orbit more than 22,000
-miles an hour, we fancy the motion to be swift; but when we find that
-he is more than three hours moving his own diameter, we must then think
-it, as it really is, slow.” Thirty Letters on various Subjects, by
-William Jackson, 1795.
-
-[48] Thomson’s First Principles of Chemistry.
-
-[49] There seems no doubt, however, that an achromatic telescope had
-been constructed by a private amateur, a Mr. Hall, some time before
-either Euler or Dollond ever thought of it.
-
-[50] We allude to the recently invented achromatic combinations of
-Messrs. Barlow and Rogers, and the dense glasses of which Mr. Faraday
-has recently explained the manufacture in a memoir full of the most
-beautiful examples of delicate and successful chemical manipulation,
-and which promise to give rise to a new era in optical practice, by
-which the next generation at least may benefit. See Phil. Trans. 1830.
-
-[51] Alphonso of Castile, 1252.
-
-[52] Jackson, Letters on Various Subjects, &c.
-
-[53] Thomson’s First Principles of Chemistry, Introduction.
-
-[54] The progress of astronomical discovery has since shown that this
-law cannot be relied on (1851).
-
-[55] Novum Organum, part ii. table 2. (24), (30), &c. on the form or
-nature of heat.
-
-[56] We will mention one which we do not remember to have seen
-noticed elsewhere in the case of a disturbance of the equilibrium of
-heat produced by means purely mechanical, and by a process depending
-entirely on a certain order and sequence of events, and the operation
-of known causes. Suppose a quantity of air enclosed in a metallic
-reservoir, of some good conductor of heat, and suddenly compressed by
-a piston. After giving time for the heat developed by the condensation
-to be communicated from the air to the metal which will be thereby
-more or less raised in temperature _above_ the surrounding atmosphere,
-let the piston be suddenly retracted and the air restored to its
-original volume in an instant. The whole apparatus is now precisely in
-its initial situation, as to the disposition of its material parts,
-and the whole quantity of heat it contains remains unchanged. But it
-is evident that the distribution of this heat within it is now very
-different from what it was before; for the air in its sudden expansion
-cannot re-absorb in an instant of time all the heat it had parted with
-to the metal: it will, therefore, have a temperature _below_ that of
-the general atmosphere, while the metal yet retains one above it. Thus,
-a subversion of the equilibrium of temperature has been _bonâ fide_
-effected. Heat has been driven from the air into the metal, while every
-thing else remains unchanged.
-
-We have here a means by which, it is evident, heat may be obtained, to
-any extent, from the air, without fuel. For if, in place of withdrawing
-the piston and letting the _same_ air expand, within the reservoir, it
-be allowed to escape so suddenly as not to re-absorb the heat given
-off, and fresh air be then admitted and the process repeated, any
-quantity of air may thus be _drained_ of its heat.
-
-[57] See Phil. Trans. 1824.
-
-[58] If the brain be an electric pile, constantly in action, it may be
-conceived to discharge itself at regular intervals, when the tension
-of the electricity developed reaches a certain point, along the nerves
-which communicate with the heart, and thus to excite the pulsations of
-that organ. This idea is forcibly suggested by a view of that elegant
-apparatus, the dry pile of Deluc; in which the successive accumulations
-of electricity are carried off by a suspended ball, which is kept by
-the discharges in a state of regular pulsation for any length of time.
-We have witnessed the action of such a pile maintained in this way for
-whole years in the study of the above-named eminent philosopher. The
-same idea of the cause of the pulsation of the heart appears to have
-occurred to Dr. Arnott; and is mentioned in his useful and excellent
-work on physics, to which however, we are not indebted for the
-suggestion, it having occurred to us independently many years ago.
-
-[59] See a description of a contrivance of this kind by Dr. Young,
-Lectures, vol. i. p. 191.
-
-[60] Boyle’s Works, folio, vol. iii. Essay x. p. 185.
-
-[61] Jackson, The Four Ages, p. 52. London: Cadell and Davies, 1798.
-8vo.
-
-[62] Jackson, The Four Ages, p. 90.
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber’s Notes
-
-
-Cover created by Transcriber and placed in the Public Domain.
-
-Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent when a
-predominant preference was found in this book; otherwise they were not
-changed.
-
-Simple typographical errors were corrected; occasional unbalanced
-quotation marks retained.
-
-Ambiguous hyphens at the ends of lines were retained.
-
-Spelling of non-English words was not reviewed.
-
-Text uses both “appreciate” and “appretiate”; both retained.
-
-Index not checked for proper alphabetization or correct page references.
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Preliminary Discourse on the Study of
-Natural Philosophy, by John F. W. Herschel
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE--NATURAL PHILOSOPHY ***
-
-***** This file should be named 54897-0.txt or 54897-0.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/5/4/8/9/54897/
-
-Produced by Sonya Schermann, Charlie Howard, and the Online
-Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
-file was produced from images generously made available
-by The Internet Archive)
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
-specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
-eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
-for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
-performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
-away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
-not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
-trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country outside the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
- are located before using this ebook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
-Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
-mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
-volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
-locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
-Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
-date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
-official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
-
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-