1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2170
2171
2172
2173
2174
2175
2176
2177
2178
2179
2180
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187
2188
2189
2190
2191
2192
2193
2194
2195
2196
2197
2198
2199
2200
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2397
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
2437
2438
2439
2440
2441
2442
2443
2444
2445
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2452
2453
2454
2455
2456
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469
2470
2471
2472
2473
2474
2475
2476
2477
2478
2479
2480
2481
2482
2483
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489
2490
2491
2492
2493
2494
2495
2496
2497
2498
2499
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
2542
2543
2544
2545
2546
2547
2548
2549
2550
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555
2556
2557
2558
2559
2560
2561
2562
2563
2564
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
2570
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579
2580
2581
2582
2583
2584
2585
2586
2587
2588
2589
2590
2591
2592
2593
2594
2595
2596
2597
2598
2599
2600
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2614
2615
2616
2617
2618
2619
2620
2621
2622
2623
2624
2625
2626
2627
2628
2629
2630
2631
2632
2633
2634
2635
2636
2637
2638
2639
2640
2641
2642
2643
2644
2645
2646
2647
2648
2649
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2656
2657
2658
2659
2660
2661
2662
2663
2664
2665
2666
2667
2668
2669
2670
2671
2672
2673
2674
2675
2676
2677
2678
2679
2680
2681
2682
2683
2684
2685
2686
2687
2688
2689
2690
2691
2692
2693
2694
2695
2696
2697
2698
2699
2700
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2720
2721
2722
2723
2724
2725
2726
2727
2728
2729
2730
2731
2732
2733
2734
2735
2736
2737
2738
2739
2740
2741
2742
2743
2744
2745
2746
2747
2748
2749
2750
2751
2752
2753
2754
2755
2756
2757
2758
2759
2760
2761
2762
2763
2764
2765
2766
2767
2768
2769
2770
2771
2772
2773
2774
2775
2776
2777
2778
2779
2780
2781
2782
2783
2784
2785
2786
2787
2788
2789
2790
2791
2792
2793
2794
2795
2796
2797
2798
2799
2800
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2844
2845
2846
2847
2848
2849
2850
2851
2852
2853
2854
2855
2856
2857
2858
2859
2860
2861
2862
2863
2864
2865
2866
2867
2868
2869
2870
2871
2872
2873
2874
2875
2876
2877
2878
2879
2880
2881
2882
2883
2884
2885
2886
2887
2888
2889
2890
2891
2892
2893
2894
2895
2896
2897
2898
2899
2900
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
2928
2929
2930
2931
2932
2933
2934
2935
2936
2937
2938
2939
2940
2941
2942
2943
2944
2945
2946
2947
2948
2949
2950
2951
2952
2953
2954
2955
2956
2957
2958
2959
2960
2961
2962
2963
2964
2965
2966
2967
2968
2969
2970
2971
2972
2973
2974
2975
2976
2977
2978
2979
2980
2981
2982
2983
2984
2985
2986
2987
2988
2989
2990
2991
2992
2993
2994
2995
2996
2997
2998
2999
3000
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3046
3047
3048
3049
3050
3051
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
3070
3071
3072
3073
3074
3075
3076
3077
3078
3079
3080
3081
3082
3083
3084
3085
3086
3087
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
3094
3095
3096
3097
3098
3099
3100
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3116
3117
3118
3119
3120
3121
3122
3123
3124
3125
3126
3127
3128
3129
3130
3131
3132
3133
3134
3135
3136
3137
3138
3139
3140
3141
3142
3143
3144
3145
3146
3147
3148
3149
3150
3151
3152
3153
3154
3155
3156
3157
3158
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3164
3165
3166
3167
3168
3169
3170
3171
3172
3173
3174
3175
3176
3177
3178
3179
3180
3181
3182
3183
3184
3185
3186
3187
3188
3189
3190
3191
3192
3193
3194
3195
3196
3197
3198
3199
3200
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3208
3209
3210
3211
3212
3213
3214
3215
3216
3217
3218
3219
3220
3221
3222
3223
3224
3225
3226
3227
3228
3229
3230
3231
3232
3233
3234
3235
3236
3237
3238
3239
3240
3241
3242
3243
3244
3245
3246
3247
3248
3249
3250
3251
3252
3253
3254
3255
3256
3257
3258
3259
3260
3261
3262
3263
3264
3265
3266
3267
3268
3269
3270
3271
3272
3273
3274
3275
3276
3277
3278
3279
3280
3281
3282
3283
3284
3285
3286
3287
3288
3289
3290
3291
3292
3293
3294
3295
3296
3297
3298
3299
3300
3301
3302
3303
3304
3305
3306
3307
3308
3309
3310
3311
3312
3313
3314
3315
3316
3317
3318
3319
3320
3321
3322
3323
3324
3325
3326
3327
3328
3329
3330
3331
3332
3333
3334
3335
3336
3337
3338
3339
3340
3341
3342
3343
3344
3345
3346
3347
3348
3349
3350
3351
3352
3353
3354
3355
3356
3357
3358
3359
3360
3361
3362
3363
3364
3365
3366
3367
3368
3369
3370
3371
3372
3373
3374
3375
3376
3377
3378
3379
3380
3381
3382
3383
3384
3385
3386
3387
3388
3389
3390
3391
3392
3393
3394
3395
3396
3397
3398
3399
3400
3401
3402
3403
3404
3405
3406
3407
3408
3409
3410
3411
3412
3413
3414
3415
3416
3417
3418
3419
3420
3421
3422
3423
3424
3425
3426
3427
3428
3429
3430
3431
3432
3433
3434
3435
3436
3437
3438
3439
3440
3441
3442
3443
3444
3445
3446
3447
3448
3449
3450
3451
3452
3453
3454
3455
3456
3457
3458
3459
3460
3461
3462
3463
3464
3465
3466
3467
3468
3469
3470
3471
3472
3473
3474
3475
3476
3477
3478
3479
3480
3481
3482
3483
3484
3485
3486
3487
3488
3489
3490
3491
3492
3493
3494
3495
3496
3497
3498
3499
3500
3501
3502
3503
3504
3505
3506
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3512
3513
3514
3515
3516
3517
3518
3519
3520
3521
3522
3523
3524
3525
3526
3527
3528
3529
3530
3531
3532
3533
3534
3535
3536
3537
3538
3539
3540
3541
3542
3543
3544
3545
3546
3547
3548
3549
3550
3551
3552
3553
3554
3555
3556
3557
3558
3559
3560
3561
3562
3563
3564
3565
3566
3567
3568
3569
3570
3571
3572
3573
3574
3575
3576
3577
3578
3579
3580
3581
3582
3583
3584
3585
3586
3587
3588
3589
3590
3591
3592
3593
3594
3595
3596
3597
3598
3599
3600
3601
3602
3603
3604
3605
3606
3607
3608
3609
3610
3611
3612
3613
3614
3615
3616
3617
3618
3619
3620
3621
3622
3623
3624
3625
3626
3627
3628
3629
3630
3631
3632
3633
3634
3635
3636
3637
3638
3639
3640
3641
3642
3643
3644
3645
3646
3647
3648
3649
3650
3651
3652
3653
3654
3655
3656
3657
3658
3659
3660
3661
3662
3663
3664
3665
3666
3667
3668
3669
3670
3671
3672
3673
3674
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
3682
3683
3684
3685
3686
3687
3688
3689
3690
3691
3692
3693
3694
3695
3696
3697
3698
3699
3700
3701
3702
3703
3704
3705
3706
3707
3708
3709
3710
3711
3712
3713
3714
3715
3716
3717
3718
3719
3720
3721
3722
3723
3724
3725
3726
3727
3728
3729
3730
3731
3732
3733
3734
3735
3736
3737
3738
3739
3740
3741
3742
3743
3744
3745
3746
3747
3748
3749
3750
3751
3752
3753
3754
3755
3756
3757
3758
3759
3760
3761
3762
3763
3764
3765
3766
3767
3768
3769
3770
3771
3772
3773
3774
3775
3776
3777
3778
3779
3780
3781
3782
3783
3784
3785
3786
3787
3788
3789
3790
3791
3792
3793
3794
3795
3796
3797
3798
3799
3800
3801
3802
3803
3804
3805
3806
3807
3808
3809
3810
3811
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816
3817
3818
3819
3820
3821
3822
3823
3824
3825
3826
3827
3828
3829
3830
3831
3832
3833
3834
3835
3836
3837
3838
3839
3840
3841
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848
3849
3850
3851
3852
3853
3854
3855
3856
3857
3858
3859
3860
3861
3862
3863
3864
3865
3866
3867
3868
3869
3870
3871
3872
3873
3874
3875
3876
3877
3878
3879
3880
3881
3882
3883
3884
3885
3886
3887
3888
3889
3890
3891
3892
3893
3894
3895
3896
3897
3898
3899
3900
3901
3902
3903
3904
3905
3906
3907
3908
3909
3910
3911
3912
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
<title>Mariner Mission to Venus, Compiled by Harold J. Wheelock: a Project Gutenberg eBook</title>
<meta name="author" content="Jet Propulsion Laboratory" />
<meta name="pss.pubdate" content="1963" />
<link rel="schema.DC" href="http://dublincore.org/documents/1998/09/dces/" />
<meta name="DC.Title" content="Mariner Mission to Venus" />
<meta name="DC.Language" content="en" />
<meta name="DC.Format" content="text/html" />
<meta name="DC.Created" content="1963" />
<meta name="DC.Creator" content="Jet Propulsion Laboratory" />
<meta name="DC.Creator" content="Harold J. Wheelock (ed.) (****-****)" />
<style type="text/css">
large { font-size:125%; }
sc { font-variant:small-caps; font-style: normal; }
/* == GLOBAL MARKUP == */
body, table.twocol tr td { margin-left:2em; margin-right:2em; } /* BODY */
.box { border-style:double; margin-bottom:2em; max-width:30em; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-top:2em; }
.box p { margin-right:1em; margin-left:1em; }
.box dl { margin-right:1em; margin-left:1em; }
h2, h5, h6, .titlepg p { text-align:left; margin-left:1.5em; clear:both; text-indent:0; font-family:sans-serif; }
/* HEADINGS */
h1 { text-align:right; margin-top:3em; text-indent:0; font-family:sans-serif; margin-right:.5em; }
h2 { margin-top:1.5em; margin-bottom:1em; }
h3 { text-align:left; clear:both; text-indent:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:90%; }
h3 { margin-top:2.5em; margin-left:2em; }
div.box h1 { margin-top:1em; }
h4, h5 { font-size:100%; text-align:center; clear:right; }
h6 { font-size:100%; }
h6.var { font-size:80%; font-style:normal; }
.titlepg { margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; border-style:double; clear:both; }
span.chaptertitle { font-style:normal; display:block; text-align:center; font-size:150%; text-indent:0; }
.tblttl { text-align:center; text-indent:0;}
.tblsttl { text-align:center; font-variant:small-caps; text-indent:0; }
pre sub.ms { width:4em; letter-spacing:1em; }
table.fmla { text-align:center; margin-top:0em; margin-bottom:0em; margin-left:0em; margin-right:0em; }
table.inline, table.symbol { display: inline-table; vertical-align: middle; }
td.cola { text-align:left; vertical-align:100%; }
td.colb { text-align:justify; }
p, blockquote, div.p, div.bq { text-align:justify; } /* PARAGRAPHS */
div.p, div.bq { margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; }
blockquote, .bq { margin-left:1em; margin-right:0em; }
.verse { font-size:100%; }
p.indent {text-indent:2em; text-align:left; }
p.tb, p.tbcenter, verse.tb, blockquote.tb { margin-top:2em; }
span.pb, div.pb, dt.pb, p.pb /* PAGE BREAKS */
{ text-align:right; float:right; margin-right:0em; clear:right; }
div.pb { display:inline; }
.pb, dl.index dt.pb, dl.toc dt.pb, dl.tocl dt.pb { text-align:right; float:right; margin-left: 1.5em;
margin-top:.5em; margin-bottom:.5em; display:inline; text-indent:0;
font-size:80%; font-style:normal; font-weight:bold;
color:gray; border:1px solid gray;padding:1px 3px; }
div.index .pb { display:block; }
.bq div.pb, .bq span.pb { font-size:90%; margin-right:2em; }
div.img, body a img {text-align:center; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:2em; clear:right; }
sup, a.fn { font-size:75%; vertical-align:100%; line-height:50%; font-weight:normal; }
h3 a.fn { font-size:65%; }
sub { font-size:75%; }
.center, .tbcenter { text-align:center; clear:both; text-indent:0; } /* TEXTUAL MARKUP */
span.center { display:block; }
table.center { clear:both; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; }
table.center tr td.l {text-align:left; margin-left:0em; }
table.center tr td.j {text-align:justify; }
table.center tr td.t {text-align:left; text-indent:1em; }
table.center tr td.t2 {text-align:left; text-indent:2em; }
table.center tr td.r {text-align:right; }
table.center tr th {vertical-align:bottom; }
table.center tr td {vertical-align:top; }
table.inline, table.symbol { display: inline-table; vertical-align: middle; }
p { clear:left; }
.small, .lsmall { font-size:80%; }
.smaller { font-size:80%; }
.smallest { font-size:67%; }
.larger { font-size:150%; }
.large { font-size:125%; }
.xlarge { font-size:200%; line-height:60%; }
.xxlarge { font-size:200%; line-height:60%; }
.gs { letter-spacing:1em; }
.gs3 { letter-spacing:2em; }
.gslarge { letter-spacing:.3em; font-size:110%; }
.sc { font-variant:small-caps; font-style:normal; }
.unbold { font-weight:normal; }
.xo { position:relative; left:-.3em; }
.over, over { text-decoration: overline; display:inline; }
hr { width:20%; }
.jl { text-align:left; }
.jr { text-align:right; min-width:2em; display:inline-block; float:right; }
.jr1 { text-align:right; margin-right:2em; }
h1 .jr { margin-right:.5em; }
.ind1 { text-align:left; margin-left:2em; }
.u { text-decoration:underline; }
.hst { margin-left:2em; }
.rubric { color:red; }
.cnwhite { color:white; background-color:black; min-width:2em; display:inline-block;
text-align:center; font-weight:bold; font-family:sans-serif; }
.cwhite { color:white; background-color:black; text-align:center; font-weight:bold;
font-family:sans-serif; }
ul li { text-align:justify; }
.ss { font-family:sans-serif; font-weight:bold; }
dd.t { text-align:left; margin-left: 5.5em; }
dl.toc { clear:both; margin-top:1em; } /* CONTENTS (.TOC) */
.toc dt.center { text-align:center; clear:both; margin-top:1em; text-indent:0; font-weight:bold; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:90%; }
.toc dt { text-align:left; clear:left; }
.toc dd { text-align:right; clear:both; }
.toc dd.ddt { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:4em; }
.toc dd.ddt2 { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:5em; }
.toc dd.ddt3 { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:6em; }
.toc dd.ddt4 { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:7em; }
.toc dd.ddt5 { text-align:right; clear:both; margin-left:8em; }
.toc dd.note { text-align:justify; clear:both; margin-left:5em; text-indent:-1em; margin-right:3em; }
.toc dt .xxxtest {width:17em; display:block; position:relative; left:4em; }
.toc dd a,
.toc dt span.left,
.toc dt span.lsmall,
.toc dd span.left { text-align:left; clear:right; float:left; }
.toc dt a span.cn { width:4em; text-align:right; margin-right:.7em; float:left; }
.toc dt.sc { text-align:right; clear:both; }
.toc dt.scl { text-align:left; clear:both; font-variant:small-caps; }
.toc dt.sct { text-align:right; clear:both; font-variant:small-caps; margin-left:1em; }
.toc dt.jl { text-align:left; clear:both; font-variant:normal; }
.toc dt.scc { text-align:center; clear:both; font-variant:small-caps; text-indent:0; }
.toc dt span.lj { text-align:left; display:block; float:left; }
.toc dd.center { text-align:center; text-indent:0; }
dd.tocsummary {text-align:justify; margin-right:2em; margin-left:2em; }
dd.center sc {display:block; text-align:center; text-indent:0; }
/* BOX CELL */
td.top { border-top:1px solid; width:.5em; height:.8em; }
td.bot { border-bottom:1px solid; width:.5em; height:.8em; }
td.rb { border:1px solid; border-left:none; width:.5em; height:.8em; }
td.lb { border:1px solid; border-right:none; width:.5em; height:.8em; }
/* INDEX (.INDEX) */
dl.index { clear:both; }
.index dt { margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left; }
.index dt.center {text-align:center; text-indent:0; }
.index dd { margin-left:4em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left; }
.index dd.ddt { margin-left:6em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left; }
.ab, .ab1, .ab2 {
font-weight:bold; text-decoration:none;
border-style:solid; border-color:gray; border-width:1px;
margin-right:0px; margin-top:5px; display:inline-block; text-align:center; text-indent:0; }
.ab { width:1em; }
.ab2 { width:1.5em; }
a.gloss { background-color:#f2f2f2; border-bottom-style:dotted; text-decoration:none; border-color:#c0c0c0; color:inherit; }
/* FOOTNOTE BLOCKS */
div.notes p { margin-left:1em; text-indent:-1em; text-align:justify; }
dl.undent dd { margin-left:3em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:justify; }
dl.undent dt { margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:justify; clear:both; }
dl.undent dd.t { margin-left:4em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:justify; }
/* POETRY LINE NUMBER */
.lnum { text-align:right; float:right; margin-left:.5em; display:inline; }
.hymn { text-align:left; } /* HYMN AND VERSE: HTML */
.verse { text-align:left; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:0em; }
.versetb { text-align:left; margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:0em; }
.originc { text-align:center; text-indent:0; }
.subttl { text-align:center; font-size:80%; text-indent:0; }
.srcttl { text-align:center; font-size:80%; text-indent:0; font-weight:bold; }
p.t0, p.l { margin-left:4em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.lb { margin-left:4em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.tw, div.tw, .tw { margin-left:1em; text-indent:-1em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t, div.t, .t { margin-left:5em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t2, div.t2, .t2 { margin-left:6em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t3, div.t3, .t3 { margin-left:7em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t4, div.t4, .t4 { margin-left:8em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t5, div.t5, .t5 { margin-left:9em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t6, div.t6, .t6 { margin-left:10em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t7, div.t7, .t7 { margin-left:11em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t8, div.t8, .t8 { margin-left:12em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t9, div.t9, .t9 { margin-left:13em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t10, div.t10,.t10 { margin-left:14em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t11, div.t11,.t11 { margin-left:15em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t12, div.t12,.t12 { margin-left:16em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t13, div.t13,.t13 { margin-left:17em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t14, div.t14,.t14 { margin-left:18em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.t15, div.t15,.t15 { margin-left:19em; text-indent:-3em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:left; }
p.lr, div.lr, span.lr { display:block; margin-left:0em; margin-right:1em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; text-align:right; }
dt.lr { width:100%; margin-left:0em; margin-right:0em; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:1em; text-align:right; }
dl dt.lr a { text-align:left; clear:left; float:left; }
.fnblock { margin-top:2em; }
.fndef { text-align:justify; margin-top:1.5em; margin-left:1.5em; text-indent:-1.5em; }
.fndef p.fncont, .fndef dl { margin-left:0em; text-indent:0em; }
dl.catalog dd { font-style:italic; }
dl.catalog dt { margin-top:1em; }
.author { text-align:right; margin-top:0em; margin-bottom:0em; display:block; }
dl.biblio dt { margin-top:.6em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:justify; clear:both; }
dl.biblio dt div { display:block; float:left; margin-left:-6em; width:6em; clear:both; }
dl.biblio dt.center { margin-left:0em; text-align:center; text-indent:0; }
dl.biblio dd { margin-top:.3em; margin-left:3em; text-align:justify; font-size:90%; }
.clear { clear:both; }
p.book { margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; }
p.review { margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; font-size:80%; }
p.pcap { margin-left:2em; text-indent:0em; margin-right:2em; text-align:justify; margin-top:0; font-weight:bold; }
p.pcapc { margin-left:4.7em; text-indent:0em; text-align:justify; }
dl.pcap { margin-left:6em; text-indent:-2em; margin-right:2em; text-align:justify; margin-top:0; font-weight:normal; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:90%; }
span.pn { display:inline-block; width:4.7em; text-align:left; margin-left:0; text-indent:0; }</style>
</head>
<body>
<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 54585 ***</div>
<div id="cover" class="img">
<img id="coverpage" src="images/cover.jpg" alt="Mariner Mission to Venus" width="500" height="744" />
</div>
<div class="img">
<img src="images/p001.jpg" alt="Mariner spacecraft" width="896" height="700" />
</div>
<div class="box">
<h1><span class="large">MARINER</span>
<br /><i><span class="smaller">MISSION TO VENUS</span></i></h1>
<p><span class="ss">Prepared for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
BY THE STAFF, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
Technology COMPILED BY HAROLD J. WHEELOCK <span class="hst">FOREWORD</span>
BY W. H. PICKERING, Director, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
Institute of Technology</span></p>
<p><span class="lr"><span class="ss">McGRAW-HILL BOOK COMPANY, INC.</span></span>
<span class="lr"><span class="ss">New York, San Francisco, Toronto, London</span></span></p>
</div>
<h3>MARINER MISSION TO VENUS</h3>
<p>Copyright © 1963 by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
California Institute of Technology. All Rights Reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.</p>
<p>Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 63-17489.</p>
<p>This book describes one phase of the U. S. civilian
space program—the journey of the Mariner spacecraft
to the vicinity of Venus and beyond. It reports upon
the measurements taken during the “flyby” on
December 14, 1962, when Mariner reached a point
21,598 miles from the planet, and 36,000,000 miles
from Earth (communication with the spacecraft was
continued up to a distance of approximately 54,000,000
miles from Earth). The Mariner mission was a
project of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
carried out under Contract No. NAS
7-100 by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
Institute of Technology.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_v">v</div>
<h3 id="c1">FOREWORD</h3>
<p>For many centuries scientific information about the planets and the
vast void that separates them has been collected by astronomers observing
from the surface of the Earth. Now, with the flight of Mariner II, we
suddenly have in our hands some 90 million bits of experimental data
measured in the region between Earth and the planet Venus. Thus, man
for the first time has succeeded in sending his instruments far into the
depths of space, and indeed, in placing them near another planet. A
whole new area of experimental astronomy has been opened up.</p>
<p>This book is a brief record of the Mariner Project to date and is designed
to explain in general terms the preliminary conclusions. Actually,
it will be months or years before all of the data from Mariner II have
been completely analyzed. The most important data were the measurements
made in the vicinity of the planet Venus, but it should also be
noted that many weeks of interplanetary environmental measurements
have given us new insight into some of the basic physical phenomena of
the solar system. The trajectory data have provided new, more accurate
measurements of the solar system. The engineering measurements of the
performance of the spacecraft will be of inestimable value in the design
of future spacecraft. Thus, the Mariner II spacecraft to Venus not only
looks at Venus but gives space scientists and engineers information helpful
in a wide variety of space ventures.</p>
<p>A project such as Mariner II is first a vast engineering task. Many
thousands of man-hours are required to design the complex automatic
equipment which must operate perfectly in the harsh environment of
space. Every detail of the system must be studied and analyzed. The
<span class="pb" id="Page_vi">vi</span>
operations required to carry out the mission must be understood and performed
with precision. A successful mission requires every member of
the entire project team to do his task perfectly. Whether it be the error
of a designer, mechanic, mathematician, technician, operator, or test
engineer—a single mistake, or a faulty piece of workmanship, may cause
the failure of the mission. Space projects abound with examples of the
old saying, “For want of a nail, the shoe was lost ...,” and so on, until
the kingdom is lost. Only when every member of the project team is
conscious of his responsibility will space projects consistently succeed.</p>
<p>The Mariner II Project started with the Lunar and Planetary Projects
Office of the Office of Space Sciences at NASA in Washington. Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, personnel provided
the main body of the team effort. They were heavily supported
by industrial contractors building many of the subassemblies of the spacecraft,
by scientists planning and designing the scientific experiments, and
by the Air Force which supplied the launching rockets. Several thousand
men and women had some direct part in the Mariner Project. It would be
impossible to list all of those who made some special contribution, but
each and every member of the project performed his job accurately, on
time, and to the highest standards.</p>
<p>Mariner II is only a prelude to NASA’s program of unmanned missions
to the planets. Missions to Mars as well as Venus will be carried out.
Spacecraft will not only fly by the planets as did Mariner II, but capsules
will be landed, and spacecraft will be put into orbit about the
planets. The next mission in the Mariner series will be a flyby of the
planet Mars in 1965.</p>
<p>By the end of the decade, where will we be exploring, what will new
Mariners have found? Will there be life on Mars, or on any other planet
of the solar system? What causes the red spot on Jupiter? What is at the
heart of a comet? These and many other questions await answers obtained
by our future spacecraft. Mariner II is just a beginning.</p>
<div class="verse">
<p class="t0"><span class="sc">W. H. Pickering</span></p>
<p class="t0"><i>Director</i></p>
<p class="t0"><i>Jet Propulsion Laboratory</i></p>
<p class="t0"><i>California Institute of Technology</i></p>
<p class="t0"><i>April, 1963</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_vii">vii</div>
<h3 class="center">CONTENTS</h3>
<dl class="toc">
<dt><a href="#c1"><span class="small"><i>FOREWORD</i></span></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c2"><span class="small"><i>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</i></span></a></dt>
<dt class="center"><a href="#c3">CHAPTER 1 VENUS</a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c4"><i>The Double Star of the Ancient World</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c5"><i>The Consensus prior to Mariner II</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c6"><i>The Cytherean Riddle: Living World or Incinerated Planet</i></a></dt>
<dt class="center"><a href="#c7">CHAPTER 2 PREPARING FOR SPACE</a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c8"><i>A Problem in Celestial Dynamics</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c9"><i>The Organization</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c10"><i>NASA: For Science</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c11"><i>JPL: JATO to Mariner</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c12"><i>General Dynamics: The Atlas</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c13"><i>Lockheed: Agena B</i></a></dt>
<dt class="center"><a href="#c14">CHAPTER 3 THE SPACECRAFT</a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c15"><i>The Spaceframe</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c16"><i>The Power System</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c17"><i>CC&S: The Brain and the Stopwatch</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c18"><i>Telecommunications: Relaying the Data</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c19"><i>Attitude Control: Balancing in Space</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c20"><i>Propulsion System</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c21"><i>Temperature Control</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c22"><i>The Scientific Instruments</i></a></dt>
<dt class="center"><a href="#c23">CHAPTER 4 THE LAUNCH VEHICLE</a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c24"><i>The Atlas Booster: Power of Six 707’s</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c25"><i>The Agena B: Start and Restart</i></a></dt>
<dt class="center"><a href="#c26">CHAPTER 5 FLIGHT INTO SPACE</a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c27"><i>Mariner I: An Abortive Launch</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c28"><i>Mariner II: A Roll before Parking</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c29"><i>The Parking Orbit</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c30"><i>Orientation and Midcourse Maneuver</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c31"><i>The Long Cruise</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c32"><i>Encounter and Beyond</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c33"><i>The Record of Mariner</i></a></dt>
<dt class="center"><a href="#c34">CHAPTER 6 THE TRACKING NETWORK</a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c35"><i>Deep Space Instrumentation Facility</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c36"><i>The Goldstone Complex</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c37"><i>The Woomera Station</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c38"><i>The Johannesburg Station</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c39"><i>Mobile Tracking Station</i></a></dt>
<dt class="center"><a href="#c40">CHAPTER 7 THIRTEEN MILLION WORDS</a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c41"><i>Communication Control</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c42"><i>The Operations Center</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c43"><i>Central Computing Facility</i></a></dt>
<dt class="center"><a href="#c44">CHAPTER 8 THE SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS</a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c45"><i>Data Conditioning System</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c46"><i>Cosmic Dust Detector</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c47"><i>Solar Plasma Experiment</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c48"><i>High-energy Radiation Experiment</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c49"><i>The Magnetometer</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c50"><i>Microwave Radiometer</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c51"><i>Infrared Radiometer</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c52"><i>Mariner’s Scientific Objectives</i></a></dt>
<dt class="center"><a href="#c53">CHAPTER 9 THE LEGACY OF MARINER</a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c54"><i>Space without Dust?</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c55"><i>The Ubiquitous Solar Wind</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c56"><i>High-energy Particles: Fatal Dosage?</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c57"><i>A Magnetic Field?</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c58"><i>The Surface: How Hot?</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c59"><i>Cloud Temperatures: The Infrared Readings</i></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c60"><i>The Radar Profile: Measurements from Earth</i></a></dt>
<dt class="center"><a href="#c61">CHAPTER 10 THE NEW LOOK OF VENUS</a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c62"><span class="small"><i>APPENDIX</i></span></a></dt>
<dt><a href="#c63"><span class="small"><i>INDEX</i></span></a></dt>
</dl>
<div class="pb" id="Page_ix">ix</div>
<h3 id="c2">ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</h3>
<p>Researching the material, gathering and comparing data, preparation
of review drafts and attending to the hundreds of details required to produce
a document on the results of such a program as the Mariner mission
to Venus is a tremendous task. Special acknowledgment is made to Mr.
Harold J. Wheelock who, on an extremely short time scale, carried the
major portion of this work to completion.</p>
<p>Although the prime sources for the information were the Planetary
Program office and the Technical Divisions of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
other organizations were extremely helpful in providing necessary
data, notably the George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, the Lockheed
Missiles and Space Company, the Astronautics Division of the General
Dynamics Corporation, and, of course, the many elements of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration.</p>
<p>JPL technical information staff members who assisted Mr. Wheelock
in production of the manuscript and its illustrations were Mr. James H.
Wilson, Mr. Arthur D. Beeman and Mr. Albert E. Tyler. JPL is also
grateful to Mr. Chester H. Johnson for his help and suggestions in preparing
the final manuscript.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_1">1</div>
<h2 id="c3"><span class="smaller">CHAPTER</span> 1
<br />VENUS</h2>
<p>Halfway between Los Angeles and Las Vegas, the California country
climbs southward out of the sunken basin of Death Valley onto the 3500-foot-high
floor of the Mojave desert.</p>
<p>On this immense plateau in an area near Goldstone Dry Lake, about
45 miles north of the town of Barstow, a group of 85-foot antennas forms
the nucleus of the United States’ world-wide, deep-space tracking network.</p>
<p>Here, on the morning of December 14, 1962, several men were
gathered in the control building beneath one of the antennas, listening
intently to the static coming from a loudspeaker. They were surrounded
by the exotic equipment of the space age. Through the window loomed
the gleaming metal framework of an antenna.</p>
<p>Suddenly a voice boomed from the loudspeaker: “The numbers are
changing. We’re getting data!”</p>
<p>The men broke into a cheer, followed by an expectant silence.</p>
<p>Again the voice came from the speaker: “The spacecraft’s crossing the
terminator ... it’s still scanning.”</p>
<p>At that moment, some 36 million miles from the Earth, the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Mariner<a class="fn" id="fr_1" href="#fn_1">[1]</a> spacecraft was passing
<span class="pb" id="Page_2">2</span>
within 21,600 miles of the planet Venus and was radioing back information
to the Goldstone Station—the first scientific data ever received by
man from the near-vicinity of another planet.</p>
<p>At the same time, in Washington, D.C., a press conference was in
progress. Mr. James E. Webb, Administrator of the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration, and Dr. William H. Pickering, Director of the
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, stood before a bank of microphones. In a few
moments, Dr. Pickering said, the audience would hear the sound of
Mariner II as it transmitted its findings back to the Earth.</p>
<p>Then, a musical warble, the voice of Mariner II, resounded in the hall
and in millions of radios and television sets around the nation. Alluding
to the Greek belief that harmonious sounds accompanied the movement
of the planets, Dr. Pickering remarked that this, in truth, was the music
of the spheres.</p>
<p>Mariner II had been launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida, on
August 27, 1962. Its arrival at Venus was the culmination of a 109-day
journey through the strange environment of interplanetary space. The
project had gone from the drawing board to the launching pad in less
than 11 months. Mariner had taxed the resources and the manpower of
the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology; the
Atlantic Missile Range centering at Cape Canaveral; theoretical and
experimental laboratories at several universities and NASA centers; numerous
elements of the aerospace industry; and, of course, NASA management
itself.</p>
<p>To the considerable body of engineers scattered around the world from
Pasadena to Goldstone to South Africa to Australia, the warble of Mariner
was something more than “the music of the spheres.” Intercept with
Venus was the climax of 109 days of hope and anxiety.</p>
<p>To the world at large, this warbling tone was a signal that the United
States had moved ahead—reached out to the planets. Mariner was exploring
the future, seeking answers to some of the unsolved questions
about the solar system.</p>
<h3 id="c4">THE DOUBLE STAR OF THE ANCIENT WORLD</h3>
<p>Venus, the glittering beacon of our solar system, has intrigued man for
at least 4,000 years. The Babylonians first mentioned the brilliant planet on
clay tablets as early as 2,000 years before Christ. The Egyptians, the
Greeks, and the Chinese had thought of Venus as two stars because it was
<span class="pb" id="Page_3">3</span>
visible first in the morning and then in the evening sky. The Greeks had
called the morning star Phosphorus and the evening star Hesperos.
By 500 B.C. Pythagoras, the Greek philosopher, had realized that the two
were identical.</p>
<p>Galileo discovered the phases of Venus in 1610. Because of the planet’s
high reflectivity, Copernicus falsely concluded that Venus was either self-luminous
or else transparent to the rays of the Sun.</p>
<p>Venus was tracked across the face of the Sun in 1761, from which event
the presence of an atmosphere about the planet was deduced because of
the fuzzy edges of the image visible in the telescope. Throughout the
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Venus continued to excite growing
scientific curiosity in Europe and America.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig1">
<img src="images/p002.jpg" alt="" width="658" height="500" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Venus’ orbit is almost circular. At inferior conjunction, the planet is between
the Earth and the Sun, approximately 26,000,000 miles away; at superior conjunction,
Venus is on the other side of the Sun. The elongations are the farthest
points to the east and the west of the Earth.</i></p>
</div>
<p>Even the development of giant telescopes and the refinement of
spectroscopic and radar astronomy techniques in recent times had yielded
few indisputable facts about Venus. Until radar studies, made from Goldstone,
California, in 1962, neither the rate nor the angle of axial spin
<span class="pb" id="Page_4">4</span>
could be determined with any degree of accuracy. The ever-shifting
atmosphere continued to shield the Venusian surface from visual observation
on Earth, and the nature of its atmosphere became an especially
controversial mystery.</p>
<h3 id="c5">THE CONSENSUS PRIOR TO MARINER II</h3>
<p>Venus is a virtual twin of the Earth; it approaches our planet closer
than any celestial body except the Moon, a few vagrant comets, and other
such galactic wanderers. Long fabled in song and legend as the most
beautiful object in the sky, Venus has an albedo, or reflectivity factor, of
59% (the Moon has one of 7%). In its brightest or crescent phase, Venus
glows like a torch, even casting a distinct shadow—the only body other
than the Sun and the Moon yielding such light.</p>
<p>Venus’ diameter is approximately 7,700 miles, compared with Earth’s
7,900. Also as compared with 1.0 for the Earth, Venus’ mean density is
0.91, the mass 0.81, and the volume 0.92.</p>
<p>The Cytherean orbit (the adjective comes from Cytherea, one of the
ancient Greek names for Aphrodite—or in Roman times, Venus—the
goddess of love) is almost a perfect circle, with an eccentricity (or out-of-roundness)
of only 0.0068, lowest of all the planets. Venus rides this
orbital path at a mean distance from the Sun of 67.2 million miles (Earth
is 93 million miles), and at a mean orbital speed of 78,300 miles per hour,
as compared with Earth’s 66,600 miles per hour.</p>
<p>It also has a shorter sidereal period (revolution around the Sun or
year): 224 Earth days, 16 hours, 48 minutes. Estimates of the Venus
rotational period, or the length of the Venus day, have ranged from
approximately 23 Earth hours to just over 224 Earth days. The latter
rotation rate would be almost equivalent to the Venusian year and, in such
case, the planet would always have the same face to the Sun.</p>
<p>Venus approaches within 26 million miles of the Earth at inferior
conjunction, and is as far away as 160 million miles at superior conjunction,
when it is on the opposite side of the Sun.</p>
<p>The escape velocity (that velocity required to free an object from the
gravitational pull of a planet) on Venus is 6.3 miles per second, compared
with Earth’s escape velocity of 7 miles per second. The gravity of the
Earth is sufficient to trap an oxygen-bearing atmosphere near the terrestrial
surface. Because the escape velocity of Venus is about the same as
that of Earth, men have long believed (or hoped) that the Cytherean
<span class="pb" id="Page_5">5</span>
world might hold a similar atmosphere and thus be favorable to the
existence of living organisms as we know them on the Earth. From this
speculation, numerous theories have evolved.</p>
<h3 id="c6">THE CYTHEREAN RIDDLE: LIVING WORLD OR INCINERATED PLANET</h3>
<p>Before Mariner II, Venus probably caused more controversy than any
other planet in our solar system except Mars. Observers have visualized
Venus as anything from a steaming abode of Mesozoic-like creatures such
as were found on the Earth millions of years ago, to a dead, noxious, and
sunless world constantly ravaged by winds of incredible force.</p>
<p>Conjectures about the Venusian atmosphere have been inescapably tied
to theories about the Venusian topography. Because the clouds forming
the Venusian atmosphere, as viewed from the Earth through the strongest
telescopes, are almost featureless, this relationship between atmosphere
and topography has posed many problems.</p>
<p>Impermanent light spots and certain dusky areas were believed by some
observers to be associated with Venusian oceans. One scientist believed
he identified a mountain peak which he calculated as rising more than
27 miles above the general level of the planet.</p>
<p>Another feature of the Venusian topography is the lack of (detectable)
polar flattening. The Earth does have such a flattening at the poles and
it was reasoned that, because Venus did not, its rate of rotation must be
much slower than that of the Earth, perhaps as little as only once during
a Venusian year, thus keeping one face perpetually toward the Sun.</p>
<p>Another school of thought speculated that Venus was covered entirely
by vast oceans; other observers concluded that these great bodies of
water have long since evaporated and that the winds, through the
Cytherean ages, have scooped up the remaining chloride salts and blasted
them into the Venusian skies, thus forming the clouds.</p>
<p>Related to the topographic speculations were equally tenuous theories
about its atmosphere. It was reasoned that if the oceans of Venus still
exist, then the Venusian clouds may be composed of water droplets; if
Venus were covered by water, it was suggested that it might be inhabited
by Venusian equivalents of Earth’s Cambrian period of 500 million years
ago, and the same steamy atmosphere could be a possibility.</p>
<p>Other theories respecting the nature of the Venusian atmosphere, depending
on how their authors viewed the Venusian terrain, included
<span class="pb" id="Page_6">6</span>
clouds of hydrocarbons (perhaps droplets of oil), or vapors of formaldehyde
and water. Finally, the seemingly high temperature of the planet’s
surface, as measured by Earth-bound instruments, was credited by some
to the false indications that could be given by a Cytherean ionosphere
heavily charged with free electrons.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig2">
<img src="images/p003.jpg" alt="" width="803" height="500" />
<p class="pcap"><i>As seen from Earth, Venus is brightest at its crescent phases as shown in these
six photographs made by the 100-inch telescope at Mt. Wilson, California.</i></p>
</div>
<p>However, the consensus of pre-Mariner scientific thinking seemed
generally to indicate no detectable free oxygen in the atmosphere; this
fact inveighed against the probability of surface vegetation, because
Earth-bound vegetation, at least, uses carbon dioxide and gives off oxygen
into the atmosphere. On the other hand, a preponderance of carbon
dioxide in the Venusian atmosphere was measured which would create a
greenhouse effect. The heat of the Sun would be trapped near the surface
of the planet, raising the temperature to as high as 615 degrees F. If the
topography were in truth relatively flat and the rate of rotation slow, the
heating effect might produce winds of 400 miles per hour or more, and
<span class="pb" id="Page_7">7</span>
sand and dust storms beyond Earthly experience. And so the controversy
continued.</p>
<p>But at 1:53.13.9 a.m., EST, on August 27, 1962, the theories of the
past few centuries were being challenged. At that moment, the night
along the east Florida coast was shattered by the roar of rocket engines
and the flash of incandescent exhaust streams. The United States was
launching Mariner II, the first spacecraft that would successfully penetrate
interplanetary space and probe some of the age-old mysteries of our
neighbor planet.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_8">8</div>
<h2 id="c7"><span class="smaller">CHAPTER</span> 2
<br />PREPARING FOR SPACE</h2>
<p>In the summer of 1961, the United States was pushing hard to
strengthen its position in the exploration of space and the near planets.
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration was planning two
projects, both to be launched by an Atlas booster and a Centaur high-energy
second stage capable of much better performance than that available
from earlier vehicles.</p>
<p>The Mariner program had two goals: Mariner A was ticketed for Venus
and Mariner B was scheduled to go to Mars. Caltech’s Jet Propulsion
Laboratory had management responsibility under NASA for both projects.
These spacecraft were both to be in the 1,000- to 1,250-pound class.
Launch opportunities for the two planets were to be best during the
1962-1964 period and the new second-stage booster known as Centaur
was expected to be ready for these operations.</p>
<p>But trouble was developing for NASA’s planners. By August, 1961, it
had become apparent that the Centaur would not be flying in time to
take advantage of the 1962 third-quarter firing period, when Venus would
approach inferior conjunction with the Earth. JPL studied the problem
and advised NASA that a proposed lightweight, hybrid spacecraft combining
certain design features of Ranger III (a lunar spacecraft) and
Mariner A could be launched to Venus in 1962 aboard a lower-powered
Atlas-Agena B launch vehicle.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_9">9</div>
<div class="img" id="fig3">
<img src="images/p004.jpg" alt="" width="736" height="500" />
<p class="pcap"><i>The Mariner II spacecraft was launched by an Atlas first-stage booster vehicle
and an Agena B second stage with restart capability.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dt>ATLAS-AGENA ADAPTER</dt>
<dt>AGENA B</dt>
<dt>MARINER SPACECRAFT</dt>
<dt>SHROUD</dt></dl>
<p>The proposed spacecraft would be called Mariner R and was to weigh
about 460 pounds and carry 25 pounds of scientific instruments (later
increased to 40 pounds). The restart capability of Agena was to be used
in a 98-statute-mile parking orbit. (The orbit was later raised to 115 statute
miles and the spacecraft weight was reduced to about 447 pounds.)</p>
<p>Two spacecraft would be launched one after the other from the same
pad within a maximum launch period extending over 56 days from July
to September, 1962. The minimum launch separation between the two
spacecraft would be 21 days.</p>
<p>As a result of the JPL recommendations, NASA cancelled Mariner A in
September, 1961, and assigned JPL to manage a Mariner R Project to fly
two spacecraft (Mariner I and II) to the vicinity of Venus in 1962.
Scientific measurements were to be made in interplanetary space and in
the immediate environs of the planet, which would also be surveyed in an
attempt to determine the characteristics of its atmosphere and surface.
Scientific and engineering data would also be transmitted from the spacecraft
to the Earth while it was in transit and during the encounter with
Venus.</p>
<p>Scientists and engineers were now faced with an arduous task. Within an
11-month period, on a schedule that could tolerate no delays, two spacecraft
had to be designed, developed, assembled, tested, and launched.
<span class="pb" id="Page_10">10</span>
In order to meet the schedule, tested flight assemblies and instruments
would have to be in the Pasadena assembly facility by mid-January, 1962,
just four months after the start of the project. Probably no other major
space project of similar scope had ever been planned on such a demanding
schedule.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig4">
<img src="images/p005.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="549" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Mariner II travelled across 180 million miles of space within our solar system
as it spanned the gap between Earth and Venus (shown here as the third and
second planets, respectively, from the Sun).</i></p>
</div>
<p>With the shipment of equipment to Atlantic Missile Range (AMR)
scheduled for 9½ months after inception of the project, management and
design teams went all-out on a true “crash” effort. Quick decisions had to
be made, a workable design had to be agreed upon very early, and, once
established, the major schedule objectives could not be changed. Certain
design modifications and manufacturing changes in the Atlas-Agena launch
vehicle were also necessary.</p>
<p>Wherever possible, Ranger design technology had to be used in the
new spacecraft and adapted to the requirements of a planetary probe.
Other necessary tasks included trajectory calculation; arrangements for
launch, space flight, and tracking operations; and coordination of AMR
Range support.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_11">11</div>
<p>Following NASA’s September, 1961 decision to go ahead with the
Mariner R Project, JPL’s Director, Dr. William H. Pickering, called on
his seasoned team of scientists and engineers. Under Robert J. Parks,
Planetary Program Director, Jack N. James was appointed as Project
Manager for Mariner R, assisted by W. A. Collier. Dan Schneiderman was
appointed Spacecraft System Manager, and Dr. Eberhardt Rechtin headed
the space tracking program, with supervision of the Deep Space Instrumentation
Facility (DSIF) operations under Dr. Nicholas Renzetti. The
Mariner space flight operations were directed by Marshall S. Johnson.</p>
<h3 id="c8">A PROBLEM IN CELESTIAL DYNAMICS</h3>
<p>In order to send Mariner close enough to Venus for its instruments to
gather significant data, scientists had to solve aiming and guidance problems
of unprecedented magnitude and complexity.</p>
<p>The 447-pound spacecraft had to be catapulted from a launching platform
moving around the Sun at 66,600 miles per hour, and aimed so
precisely that it would intercept a planet moving 78,300 miles per hour
(or 11,700 miles per hour faster than the Earth) at a point in space and
time some 180.2 million miles away and 109 days later, with only one
chance to correct the trajectory by a planned midcourse maneuver.</p>
<p>And the interception had to be so accurate that the spacecraft would
pass Venus within 8,000 to 40,000 miles. The chances of impacting the
planet could not exceed 1 in 1,000 because Mariner was not sterilized
and might contaminate Venus. Also, much more data could be gathered
on a near-miss flight path than on impact. Furthermore, at encounter (in
the target area) the spacecraft had to be so positioned that it could communicate
with Earth, see the Sun with its solar panels, and scan Venus at
the proper angles.</p>
<p>Along the way, Mariner had to be able to orient itself so that its solar
panels were facing or “locked onto” the Sun in order to generate its own
power; acquire and maintain antenna orientation to the Earth; correct its
attitude constantly to hold Earth and Sun lock; receive, store, and execute
commands to alter its course for a closer approach to Venus; and communicate
its findings to Earth with only 3 watts of radiated power and
over distances never before spanned.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_12">12</div>
<div class="img" id="fig5">
<img src="images/p006.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="679" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Mariner II was launched in a direction opposite to the orbital travel of the
Earth. The Sun’s gravity then pulled it in toward the planet Venus.</i></p>
</div>
<p>Early in the program it had been decided that two spacecraft would be
launched toward Venus. Only 56 days were available for both launchings
and the planet would not be close enough again for 19 months—the period
between inferior conjunctions or the planet’s closest approach to the Earth.
On any one of these days, a maximum of 2 hours could be used for getting
the vehicles off the launch pad. In addition, the Mariners would have to
leave the Earth in a direction opposite to that of the Earth’s direction of
orbital revolution around the Sun. This flight path was necessary so the
<span class="pb" id="Page_13">13</span>
spacecraft could then fall in toward the Sun and intercept Venus, catching
and passing the Earth along the way, about 65 days and 11.5 million
miles out.</p>
<p>This feat of celestial navigation had to be performed while passing
through the hostile environment of interplanetary space, where the probe
might be subjected to solar winds (charged particles) travelling at velocities
up to 500 miles per second; intense bombardment from cosmic radiation,
charged protons, and alpha particles moving perhaps 1.5 million
miles per hour; radiated heat that might raise the spacecraft temperatures
to unknown values; and the unknown dangers from cosmic dust, meteorites,
and other miscellaneous space debris.</p>
<p>In flight, each spacecraft would have to perform more than 90,000
measurements per day, reporting back to the Earth on 52 engineering
readings, the changes in interplanetary magnetic fields, the density and
distribution of charged particles and cosmic dust, and the intensity and
velocity of low-energy protons streaming out from the Sun.</p>
<p>At its closest approach to Venus, the spacecraft instruments would be
required to scan the planet during a brief 35-minute encounter, to gather
data that would enable Earth scientists to determine the temperature and
structure of the atmosphere and the surface, and to process and transmit
that data back to the Earth.</p>
<h3 id="c9">THE ORGANIZATION</h3>
<p>Flying Mariner to Venus was a team effort made possible through the
combined resources of several United States governmental organizations
and their contractors, science, and industry. The success of the Mariner
Project resulted primarily from the over-all direction and management of
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, and the production and launch capabilities of the vehicle
builders and the Air Force. Several organizations bore the major responsibility:
NASA Headquarters, JPL, NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center
and Launch Operations Center, Astronautics Division of General Dynamics,
and Lockheed Missiles and Space Company.</p>
<h3 id="c10">NASA: FOR SCIENCE</h3>
<p>The National Aeronautics and Space Administration was an outgrowth
of the participation of the United States in the International Geophysical
Year program and of the nation’s space effort, revitalized following Russia’s
successful orbiting of Sputnik I in 1957.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_14">14</div>
<div class="img" id="fig6">
<img src="images/p007.jpg" alt="" width="636" height="500" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Final NACA meeting, August 21, 1958.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig7">
<img src="images/p007a.jpg" alt="" width="464" height="599" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Model of X-1 research plane.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig8">
<img src="images/p007b.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="638" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Headquarters of National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_15">15</div>
<div class="img" id="fig9">
<img src="images/p007d.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="506" />
<p class="pcap"><i>JPL developed first JATO units in 1941.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig10">
<img src="images/p007f.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="665" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Other Laboratory Projects were the
Corporal missile (left) and Explorer I (right), the first U.S. satellite.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_16">16</div>
<p>Under the terms of the law which created NASA, it is a Federal Agency
dedicated to carrying out “activities in space ... devoted to peaceful
purposes for the benefit of all mankind.” NASA is charged to preserve the
role of our nation as a leader in the aeronautical and space sciences and
technology and to utilize effectively the science and engineering resources
of the United States in accomplishing these goals. Activities associated
with military operations in space and the development of weapons systems
are specifically assigned to the Defense Department.</p>
<p>In November, 1957, before the creation of NASA, President Eisenhower
had established a Scientific Advisory Committee to determine the national
objectives and requirements in space and to establish the basic framework
within which science, industry, and the academic community could best
support these objectives.</p>
<p>The Committee submitted a report to the President in March, 1958,
recommending creation of a civilian agency to conduct the national space
programs. The recommendation, endorsed by the President, was submitted
to the Congress on April 2, 1958. The National Aeronautics and
Space Act of 1958 was passed and became law in July, 1958.</p>
<p>NASA was officially established on October 1, 1958, and Dr. T. Keith
Glennan, President of Case Institute of Technology, was appointed as
the first Administrator. The facilities and personnel of the National
Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) were transferred to form
the nucleus of the new NASA agency.</p>
<p>NACA had performed important and significant research in aeronautics,
wind tunnel technology, and aerodynamics since 1915, including a series
of experimental rocket research aircraft that culminated in the X-15.
It was natural that it be expanded to include space operations.</p>
<p>Among the NACA Centers transferred to NASA were the Langley
Research Center at Hampton, Virginia; Lewis Research Center, Cleveland,
Ohio; Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California; Flight Research
Center, Edwards, California; and the rocket launch facility at Wallops
Island, Virginia.</p>
<p>Those personnel of the Naval Research Laboratory who had been
working on Project Vanguard were also transferred to NASA, as was the
project. These personnel are now part of the new Goddard Space Flight
Center at Greenbelt, Maryland.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_17">17</div>
<p>The October, 1958, transfers also included a number of the space
projects of the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Defense Department.
In a December, 1958, Executive Order, the President assigned the
former Army facilities of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at Pasadena, California,
to NASA. At the same time, the group working under Dr. Wernher
von Braun at the Army Ballistic Missile Agency (commanded by Major
General John B. Medaris) was made responsive to NASA requirements.</p>
<p>On July 1, 1960, the George C. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC)
was organized at Huntsville under von Braun’s direction. The former
Development Operations Division of ABMA formed the nucleus of the
new Center. The MSFC mission was to procure and to supervise the adaptation
of launch vehicles for NASA space missions, including Atlas, Thor,
and Agena. Marshall is directly responsible for the design and development
of advanced, high-thrust booster vehicles such as the Saturn C-1
and C-5 and the Nova.</p>
<p>An agency to conduct NASA affairs at Cape Canaveral was formed
within MSFC on July 1, 1960. Known then as the Launch Operations
Directorate (LOD), it was directed by Dr. Kurt H. Debus. LOD became
independent of Marshall in March, 1962, when it was redesignated the
Launch Operations Center (LOC), reporting directly to the Office of
Manned Space Flight. This separation resulted largely because the activities
at AMR were becoming more operational in character and less
oriented toward research and development.</p>
<p>LOC handles such functions for NASA as the scheduling of launch
dates and liaison with the Atlantic Missile Range for support activities.
The Center will have the responsibility in the field for assembly, checkout,
and launch of the Saturn and Nova boosters.</p>
<p>Following the election of President Kennedy in 1961, James E. Webb
replaced Dr. Glennan as Administrator of NASA. Shortly after, a new
national goal was announced—placing a man on the Moon and returning
him safely to the Earth in this decade. Meanwhile, JPL had been assigned
responsibility for unmanned exploration of the Moon, the planets, and
interplanetary space, and thus was charged with supporting the NASA
manned flight program through these activities.</p>
<p>In less than five years, NASA grew to include eight flight and research
centers and about 21,000 technical and management personnel. Within
NASA, Dr. Abe Silverstein’s Office of Space Flight Programs was responsible
for the Mariner R Project which was directly assigned to Ed Cortright,
<span class="pb" id="Page_18">18</span>
Director of Lunar & Planetary Programs, and Fred Kochendorfer,
who is NASA’s Program Chief for Mariner. A subsequent reorganization
placed responsibility under Dr. Homer Newell’s Office of Space Sciences,
and Oran Nicks became Director of Lunar & Planetary Programs.</p>
<h3 id="c11">JPL: JATO TO MARINER</h3>
<p>The Jet Propulsion Laboratory, staffed and operated for NASA by
California Institute of Technology, had long been active in research and
development in the fields of missiles, rockets, and the space-associated
sciences. The first government-sponsored rocket research group in the
United States, JPL had originated on the Caltech campus in 1939, an
outgrowth of the Guggenheim Aeronautical Laboratories, then headed
by celebrated aerodynamicist Dr. Theodore von Karman.</p>
<p>Von Karman and his associates moved their operation to a remote spot
at the foot of the San Gabriel mountains and, working from this base, in
1941 the pioneering group developed the first successful jet-assisted aircraft
takeoff (JATO) units for the Army Air Force. The Laboratory began
a long association with the Army Ordnance Corps in 1944, when the
Private A test rocket was developed. In retrospect, it is now recognized
that the Private A was the first U. S. surface-to-surface, solid-propellant
rocket. Its range was 10 miles!</p>
<p>JPL’s WAC Corporal rocket set a U. S. high-altitude record of 43.5
miles in 1945. Mounted on a German V-2 as the Bumper-WAC, it achieved
an altitude record of 250 miles in 1947. More important, this event was
the first successful in-flight separation of a two-stage rocket—the feasibility
of space exploration had been proved.</p>
<p>After the end of World War II, JPL research set the stage for high-energy
solid-propellant rockets. For the first time the solid propellants,
which contained both fuel and oxidizers, were cast in thin-walled cases.
Techniques were then developed for bonding the propellants to the case,
and burning radially outward from the central axis was achieved. Attention
was then turned to increasing the energy of the propellants.</p>
<p>By 1947, the Corporal E, a new liquid-propellant research rocket, was
being fired. JPL was asked to convert it into a tactical weapon in 1949.
The Corporal E then became the first liquid-propellant surface-to-surface
guided missile developed by the United States or the Western bloc of
nations.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_19">19</div>
<p>Because of the need for higher mobility and increased firing rate, JPL
later designed and developed the solid-propellant Sergeant—the nation’s
first “second-generation” weapon system. This inertially guided missile
was immune to electronic countermeasures by an enemy.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, JPL scientists had pioneered in the development of electronic
telemetering techniques, which permit an accurate monitoring of
system performance while missiles are in flight. By 1944, Dr. William H.
Pickering, a New Zealand born and Caltech-trained physicist who had
worked with Dr. Robert Millikan in cosmic ray research, had been placed
in charge of the telemetering effort at JPL. Pickering became Director of
the Laboratory in 1954.</p>
<p>Following the launching of Sputnik I, the Army-JPL team which had
worked on the Jupiter C missile to test nose cones, was assigned the
responsibility for putting the first United States satellite into orbit as soon
as possible. In just 83 days, a modified Jupiter C launch vehicle was
prepared, an instrumented payload was assembled, a network of space
communications stations was established, and Explorer I was orbited on
January 31, 1958. Explorer was an instrumented assembly developed by
JPL and the State University of Iowa. It discovered the inner Van Allen
radiation belt.</p>
<p>Subsequently, JPL worked with the Army on other projects to explore
space and to orbit satellites. Among these were Pioneer III, which located
the outer Van Allen Belt, and Pioneer IV, the first U. S. space probe to
reach Earth-escape velocity and to perform a lunar fly-by mission.</p>
<h3 id="c12">GENERAL DYNAMICS: THE ATLAS</h3>
<p>The launch vehicle for Mariner was an Atlas D booster with an
Agena B second stage. Historically, Atlas can be traced to October, 1954,
when the former Convair Corporation (later acquired by General
Dynamics) was invited to submit proposals for research and development
of four missile systems, including a 5,000-mile intercontinental
weapon.</p>
<p>In January, 1946, Convair assigned K. J. Bossart to begin a study of
two proposed types of 5,000-mile missiles: one jet powered at subsonic
speeds, with wings for aerodynamic control; the other a supersonic,
ballistic (wingless and bullet-like), rocket-powered missile capable of
operating outside the Earth’s atmosphere.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_20">20</div>
<div class="img" id="fig11">
<img src="images/p008.jpg" alt="" width="577" height="799" />
<p class="pcap"><span class="center small"><i>Photo courtesy of General Dynamics/Astro</i></span>
<i>Atlas missiles in assembly facility at General Dynamics/Astronautics plant.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_21">21</div>
<p>This was the beginning of Project MX-774, lineal ancestor of Atlas.
After captive testing at San Diego in 1947, three of the experimental
missiles were test-launched at White Sands Proving Ground in New
Mexico. The first flight failed at 6,200 feet after a premature engine
burnout.</p>
<p>In 1947, the Air Force shelved the MX-774 project. However, this
brief program had proved the feasibility of three concepts later used in
Atlas: swiveling engines for directional control; lightweight, pressurized
airframe structures; and separable nose cones.</p>
<p>The Korean War stimulated the ICBM concept and, in 1951, a new
MX-1593 contract was awarded to Convair to study ballistic and glide
rockets. By September, 1951, Convair was proposing a ballistic missile
that would incorporate some of the features of the MX-774 design. A plan
for an accelerated program was presented to the Air Force in 1953. After
a year of study, a full go-ahead for the project, now called Atlas, was
given in January, 1955.</p>
<p>The unit handling the Atlas program was set up as Convair Astronautics,
with J. R. Dempsey as president, on March 1, 1957.</p>
<p>The first Atlas test flight, in June of 1957, ended in destruction of the
missile when it went out of control. Following another abortive attempt,
the first fully successful flight of an Atlas missile was made from Cape
Canaveral on December 17, 1957.</p>
<p>The Atlas program was in full swing by 1958, when 14 test missions
were flown. The entire missile was orbited in December, 1958, as Project
Score. It carried the voice of President Eisenhower as a Christmas message
to the world. The Atlas missile system was accepted for field operations
by the Air Force in 1958.</p>
<p>Also in 1958, an Atlas achieved a new distance record, flying more
than 9,000 miles down the Atlantic Missile Range, where it landed in
the Indian Ocean, off the South African coast.</p>
<p>Atlas has been modified for use by NASA as a space vehicle booster.
Known as the Atlas D, it has launched lunar probes, communications and
scientific Earth satellites, and manned space vehicles.</p>
<h3 id="c13">LOCKHEED: AGENA B</h3>
<p>The Lockheed Agena B second-stage vehicle was mounted on top of
the Atlas booster in the launch of the Mariner spacecraft. The U. S. Air
Force had first asked Lockheed Missiles and Space Division, headed by
<span class="pb" id="Page_22">22</span>
L. E. Root, to work on an advanced orbital vehicle for both military and
scientific applications in 1956. On October 29 of that year, Lockheed was
appointed prime weapon system contractor on the new Agena Project,
under the Air Force Ballistic Missile Division. In order to speed the program,
the Thor missile was used as the booster stage for the early Agena
flights. The Atlas was also utilized in later operations.</p>
<p>In August, 1957, the Air Force recommended that the program be
accelerated as much as possible. After Russia orbited Sputnik I in October
of 1957, a further speed-up was ordered.</p>
<p>The first of the Agena-Discoverer series was launched into orbit on
February 28, 1959, with the Thor missile as the booster. The first restart
in orbit occurred on February 18, 1961, when the new Agena B configuration
was used to put Discoverer XXI into orbit. All of the NASA missions
using Agena, beginning with Ranger I in August, 1961, have been
flown with the B model.</p>
<p>Agena holds several orbiting records for U. S. vehicles. The first water
recovery followed the 17 orbits of Discoverer XIII on August 11, 1960.
The first air recovery of a capsule from orbit occurred with Discoverer
XIV on August 18, 1960. In all, a total of 11 capsules were recovered
from orbit, 7 in the air, 4 from the sea.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_23">23</div>
<h2 id="c14"><span class="smaller">CHAPTER</span> 3
<br />THE SPACECRAFT</h2>
<p>In the 11 brief months which JPL had to produce the Mariner spacecraft
system, there was no possibility of designing an entirely new
spacecraft. JPL’s solution to the problem was derived largely from the
Laboratory’s earlier space exploration vehicles, such as the Vega, the
Ranger lunar series, and the cancelled Mariner A.</p>
<p>Wherever possible, components and subsystems designed for these
projects were either utilized or redesigned. Where equipment was purchased
from industrial contractors, existing hardware was adapted, if
practicable. Only a minimum of testing could be performed on newly
designed equipment and lengthy evaluation of “breadboard” mock-ups
was out of the question.</p>
<p>Ready for launch, the spacecraft measured 5 feet in diameter and
9 feet 11 inches in height. With the solar panels and the directional
antenna unfolded in the cruise position, Mariner was 16 feet 6 inches
wide and 11 feet 11 inches high.</p>
<h3 id="c15">THE SPACEFRAME</h3>
<p>The design engineers were forced to work within the framework of the
earlier spacecraft technology because of the time restrictions, but Mariner
I and II could weigh only about half as much as the Ranger spacecraft
and just over one-third as much as the planned Mariner A.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_24">24</div>
<div class="img" id="fig12">
<img src="images/p009.jpg" alt="" width="603" height="700" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Mariner spacecraft with solar panels, microwave radiometer, and directional
antenna extended in flight position. Principal components are shown.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dt>ROLL AXIS</dt>
<dt>OMNIANTENNA</dt>
<dt>MAGNETOMETER SENSOR</dt>
<dt>PARTICLE FLUX DETECTORS (GEIGER TUBES)</dt>
<dt>RADIOMETER REFERENCE HORNS</dt>
<dt>MICROWAVE RADIOMETER</dt>
<dt>INFRARED RADIOMETER</dt>
<dt>ION-CHAMBER</dt>
<dt>COSMIC DUST DETECTOR</dt>
<dt>EARTH SENSOR</dt>
<dt>SOLAR PANEL</dt>
<dt>COMMAND ANTENNA</dt>
<dt>SOLAR SAIL</dt>
<dt>ATTITUDE CONTROL GAS BOTTLES</dt>
<dt>SOLAR PLASMA DETECTOR</dt>
<dt>DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA</dt></dl>
<div class="pb" id="Page_25">25</div>
<p>The basic structural unit of Mariner was a hexagonal frame made of
magnesium and aluminum, to which was attached an aluminum superstructure,
a liquid-propelled rocket engine for midcourse trajectory correction,
six rectangular chassis mounted one on each face of the hexagonal
structure, a high-gain directional antenna, the Sun sensors, and gas jets
for control of the spacecraft’s attitude.</p>
<p>The tubular, truss-type superstructure extended upward from the base
hexagon. It provided support for the solar panels while latched under the
shroud during the launch phase, and for the radiometers, the magnetometer,
and the nondirectional antenna, which was mounted at the top of
the structure. The superstructure was designed to be as light as possible,
yet be capable of withstanding the predicted load stresses.</p>
<p>The six magnesium chassis mounted to the base hexagon housed the
following equipment: the electronics circuits for the six scientific experiments,
the communications system electronics; the data encoder (for
processing data before telemetering it to the Earth) and the command
electronics; the attitude control, digital computer, and timing sequencer
circuits; a power control and battery charger assembly; and the battery
assembly.</p>
<p>The allotment of weights for Mariner II forced rigid limitation in the
structural design of the spacecraft. As launched, the weights of the major
spacecraft subsystems were as follows:</p>
<table class="center" summary="">
<tr><td class="l">Structure </td><td class="r">77 pounds</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Solar panels </td><td class="r">48 pounds</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Electronics </td><td class="r">146 pounds</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Propulsion </td><td class="r">32 pounds</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Battery </td><td class="r">33 pounds</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Scientific experiments </td><td class="r">41 pounds</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Miscellaneous equipment </td><td class="r"><span class="u">70 pounds</span></td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Gross weight </td><td class="r">447 pounds</td></tr>
</table>
<h3 id="c16">THE POWER SYSTEM</h3>
<p>Mariner II was self-sufficient in power. It converted energy from sunlight
into electrical current through the use of solar panels composed of
photoelectric cells which charged a battery installed in one of the six
chassis on the hexagonal base. The control, switching, and regulating circuits
were housed in another of the chassis cases.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_26">26</div>
<div class="img" id="fig13">
<img src="images/p010.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="442" />
<p class="pcap"><i>This hexagonal frame, constructed of magnesium and aluminum, is the basic
supporting structure around which the Mariner spacecraft is assembled.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig14">
<img src="images/p010a.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="549" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Plan view from top showing six magnesium chassis hinged in open position.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dt>VIEW LOOKING AFT ASSEMBLIES HINGED IN OPEN POSITION</dt>
<dd>SCIENTIFIC EQUIPMENT ASSEMBLY I</dd>
<dd>COMMUNICATIONS ASSEMBLY II</dd>
<dd>DATA ENCODER AND COMMAND ASSEMBLY III</dd>
<dd>ATTITUDE CONTROL AND CC AND S ASSEMBLY IV</dd>
<dd>POWER ASSEMBLY V</dd>
<dd>BATTERY ASSEMBLY VI</dd></dl>
<div class="pb" id="Page_27">27</div>
<p>The battery operated the spacecraft systems during the period from
launch until the solar panels were faced onto the Sun. In addition, the
battery supplied power during trajectory maneuvers when the panels
were temporarily out of sight of the Sun. It shared the demand for power
when the panels were overloaded. The battery furnished power directly
for switching various equipment in flight and for certain other heavy
loads of brief duration, such as the detonation of explosive devices for
releasing the solar panels.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig15">
<img src="images/p010d.jpg" alt="" width="572" height="801" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Mariner spacecraft with solar panels in open position. Note
extension to left panel to balance solar pressures in flight.</i></p>
</div>
<p>The Mariner battery used sealed silver-zinc cells and had a capacity of
1000 watt-hours. It weighed 33 pounds and was recharged in flight by
the solar panels.</p>
<p>The solar panels, as originally designed, were 60 inches long by
30 inches wide and contained approximately 9800 solar cells in a total
area of 27 square feet. Each solar cell produced only about 230 one-thousandths
of a volt. The entire array was designed to convert the Sun’s
<span class="pb" id="Page_28">28</span>
energy to electrical power in the range between 148 and 222 watts.
When a later design change required the extension of one panel in order
to add more solar cells, it was necessary to add a blank extension to the
other panel in order to balance the solar pressure on the spacecraft.</p>
<p>In order to protect the solar cells from the infrared and ultraviolet radiation
of the Sun, which would produce heat but no electrical energy, each
cell was shielded from these rays by a glass filter which was nevertheless
transparent to the light which the cells converted into power.</p>
<p>The power subsystem electronics circuits were housed in another of
the hexagon chassis cases. This equipment was designed to receive and
switch power either from the solar panels, the battery, or a combination
of the two, to a booster-regulator.</p>
<h3 id="c17">CC&S: THE BRAIN AND THE STOPWATCH</h3>
<p>Once the Atlas booster lifted Mariner off the launch pad, the digital
Central Computer and Sequencer (CC&S) performed certain computations
and provided the basic timing control for those spacecraft subsystems
which required a sequenced programming control.</p>
<p>The CC&S was designed to initiate the operations of the spacecraft in
three distinct sequences or “modes”: (1) the launch mode, from launch
through the cruise configuration; (2) the midcourse propulsion mode,
when Mariner readjusted its sights on Venus; and (3) the encounter
mode, involving commands for data collection in the immediate vicinity
of the planet.</p>
<p>The CC&S timed Mariner’s actions as it travelled more than 180 million
miles in pursuit of Venus. A highly accurate electronic clock (crystal-controlled
oscillator) scheduled the operations of the spacecraft subsystems.
The oscillator frequency of 307.2 kilocycles was reduced to the
2,400- and 400-cycle-per-second output required for the power subsystem.</p>
<p>The control oscillator also timed the issuance of commands by the
CC&S in each of the three operating modes of the spacecraft.</p>
<p>A 1-pulse-per-minute signal was provided for such launch sequence
events as the extension of the solar panels 44 minutes after launch, turning
on power for the attitude control subsystem one hour after launch,
and for certain velocity correction commands during the midcourse
maneuver.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_29">29</div>
<div class="img" id="fig16">
<img src="images/p011.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="752" />
<p class="pcap"><i>The spacecraft used two antennas for communication.
The omni-antenna (top) was utilized when the directional antenna (bottom)
could not be pointed at the Earth.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig17">
<img src="images/p011a.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="443" />
<p class="pcap"><i>This command antenna (on solar panel) was used to receive maneuver commands.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_30">30</div>
<p>A 1-pulse-per-second signal was generated as a reference during the
roll and pitch maneuvers in the midcourse trajectory correction phase.
One pulse was generated every 3.3 hours in order to initiate the command
to orient the directional antenna on the Earth at 167 hours after
launch.</p>
<p>Finally, one pulse every 16.7 hours was used to readjust the Earth-oriented
direction of the antenna throughout the flight.</p>
<h3 id="c18">TELECOMMUNICATIONS: RELAYING THE DATA</h3>
<p>The telecommunications subsystem enabled Mariner to receive and
to decode commands from the Earth, to encode and to transmit information
concerning space and Mariner’s own functioning, and to provide a
means for precise measurement of the spacecraft’s velocity and position
relative to the Earth. The spacecraft accomplished all these functions
using only 3 watts of transmitted power up to a maximum range of
53.9 million miles.</p>
<p>A data encoder unit, with CC&S sequencing, timed the three phases
of Mariner’s journey: (1) In the launch mode, only engineering data on
spacecraft performance were transmitted; (2) during the cruise mode,
information concerning space and Mariner’s own functioning was transmitted;
and (3) while the spacecraft was in the vicinity of Venus, only
scientific information concerning the planet was to be transmitted. (The
CC&S failed to start the third mode automatically and it was initiated by
radio command from the Earth.) After the encounter with Venus, Mariner
was programmed to switch back to the cruise mode for handling both
engineering and science data (this sequence was also commanded by
Earth radio).</p>
<p>Mariner II used a technique for modulating (superimposing intelligent
information) its radio carrier with telemetry data known as phase-shift
keying. In this system, the coded signals from the telemetry measurements
displace another signal of the same frequency but of a different
phase. These displacements in phase are received on the Earth and then
translated back into the codes which indicate the voltage, temperature,
intensity, or other values measured by the spacecraft telemetry sensors
or scientific instruments.</p>
<p>A continually repeating code, almost noise-like both in sound and
appearance on an oscilloscope, was used for synchronizing the ground
receiver decoder with the spacecraft. This decoder then deciphered the
data carried on the information channel.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_31">31</div>
<p>This technique was called a two-channel, binary-coded, pseudo-noise
communication system and it was used to modulate a radio signal for
transmission, just as in any other radio system.</p>
<p>Radio command signals transmitted to Mariner were decoded in a
command subassembly, processed, and routed to the proper using devices.
A transponder was used to receive the commands, send back confirmation
of receipt to the Earth, and distribute them to the spacecraft subsystems.</p>
<p>Mariner II used four antennas in its communication system. A cone-like
nondirectional (omni) antenna was mounted at the top of the spacecraft
superstructure, and was used from injection into the Venus flight
trajectory through the midcourse maneuver (the directional antenna
could not be used until it had been oriented on the Earth).</p>
<p>A dish-type, high-gain, directional antenna was used at Earth orientation
and after the trajectory correction maneuver was completed. It could
receive radio signals at greater distances than the nondirectional antenna.
The directional antenna was nested beneath the hexagonal frame of the
spacecraft while it was in the nose-cone shroud. Following the unfolding
of the solar panels, it was swung into operating position, although it was
not used until after the spacecraft locked onto the Sun.</p>
<p>The directional antenna was equipped with flexible coaxial cables and
a rotary joint. It could move in two directions; one motion was supplied
by rolling the spacecraft around its long axis.</p>
<p>In addition, two command antennas, one on either side of one of the
solar panels, received radio commands from the Earth for the midcourse
maneuver and other functions.</p>
<h3 id="c19">ATTITUDE CONTROL: BALANCING IN SPACE</h3>
<p>Mariner II had to maintain a delicate balance in its flight position
during the trip to Venus (like a tight-wire walker balancing with a pole)
in order to keep its solar panels locked onto the Sun and the directional
antenna pointed at the Earth. Otherwise, both power and communications
would have been lost.</p>
<p>A system of gas jets and valves was used periodically to adjust the
attitude or position of the spacecraft. Expulsion of nitrogen gas supplied
the force for these adjustments during the cruise mode. While the spacecraft
was subjected to the heavier disturbances caused by the rocket
engine during the midcourse maneuver, the gas jets could not provide
<span class="pb" id="Page_32">32</span>
enough power to control the attitude of the spacecraft and it was necessary
to use deflecting vanes as rudders in the rocket engine exhaust stream
for stabilizing purposes.</p>
<p>The attitude control system was activated by CC&S command 60 minutes
after launching. It operated first to align the long axis of the spacecraft
with the Sun; thus its solar panels would face the Sun. Either the
Sun sensors or the three gyroscopes mounted in the pitch (rocking back
and forth), yaw (side to side), and roll axes, could activate the gas jet
valves during the maneuver, which normally required about 30 minutes
to complete.</p>
<p>The spacecraft was allowed a pointing error of 1 degree in order to
conserve gas. The system kept the spacecraft swinging through this
1 degree of arc approximately once each 60 minutes. As it neared the
limit on either side, the jets fired for approximately ¹/₅₀ of a second to
start the swing slowly in the other direction. Thus, Mariner rocked
leisurely back and forth throughout its 4-month trip.</p>
<p>Sensitive photomultiplier tubes or electric eyes in the Earth sensor,
mounted on the directional antenna, activated the gas jets to roll the
spacecraft about the already fixed long axis in order to face the antenna
toward the Earth. When the Earth was “acquired,” the antenna would
then necessarily be oriented in the proper direction. If telemetry revealed
that Mariner had accidentally fixed on the Moon, over-ride radio commands
from the Earth could restart the orientation sequence.</p>
<h3 id="c20">PROPULSION SYSTEM</h3>
<p>The Mariner propulsion system for midcourse trajectory correction
employed a rocket engine that weighed 37 pounds with fuel and a
nitrogen pressure system, and developed 50 pounds of thrust for a maximum
of 57 seconds. The system was suspended within the central portion
of the basic hexagonal structure of the spacecraft.</p>
<p>This retro-rocket engine used a type of liquid propellant known as
anhydrous hydrazine and it was so delicately controlled that it could burn
for as little as ²/₁₀ of a second and increase the velocity of the spacecraft
from as little as ⁷/₁₀ of a foot per second to as much as 200 feet per second.</p>
<p>The hydrazine fuel was stored in a rubber bladder inside a doorknob-shaped
container. At the ignition command, nitrogen gas under 3,000-pound-per-square-inch
pressure was forced into the propellant tank
<span class="pb" id="Page_33">33</span>
through explosively activated valves. The nitrogen then squeezed the
rubber bladder, forcing the hydrazine into the combustion chamber.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig18">
<img src="images/p012.jpg" alt="" width="752" height="600" />
<p class="pcap"><i>The midcourse propulsion system provides trajectory
correction for close approach to Venus.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dt>FUEL TANK</dt>
<dt>NITROGEN TANK</dt>
<dt>JET VANE ACTUATOR (ONE OF FOUR)</dt>
<dt>THRUST CHAMBER</dt></dl>
<p>Hydrazine, a monopropellant, requires a starting ignition for proper
combustion. In the Mariner system, nitrogen tetroxide starting or “kindling”
fluid was injected into the propellant tank by a pressurized cartridge.
Aluminum oxide pellets in the tank acted as catalysts to control
the speed of combustion of the hydrazine. The burning of the hydrazine
was stopped when the flow of nitrogen gas was halted, also by explosively
activated valves.</p>
<h3 id="c21">TEMPERATURE CONTROL</h3>
<p>Mariner’s 129 days in space presented some unique problems in temperature
control. Engineers were faced with the necessity of achieving
some form of thermal balance so that Mariner would become neither too
hot nor too cold in the hostile environment of space.</p>
<p>The spacecraft’s temperature control system was made as thermally
self-sufficient as possible. Paint patterns, aluminum sheet, thin gold plating,
and polished aluminum surfaces reflected and absorbed the proper
amount of heat necessary to keep the spacecraft and its subsystems at
the proper operating temperatures.</p>
<p>Thermal shields were used to protect the basic hexagon components.
The upper shield, constructed of aluminized plastic on a fiberglass panel,
<span class="pb" id="Page_34">34</span>
protected the top of the basic structure and was designed for maximum
immunity to ultraviolet radiation. The lower shield was installed below
the hexagon; it was made of aluminum plastic faced with aluminum foil
where it was exposed to the blast of the midcourse rocket engine exhaust.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig19">
<img src="images/p013.jpg" alt="" width="735" height="600" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Methods used to control the temperature of the Mariner spacecraft in flight.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dt>CHROMATE CONVERSION COATING</dt>
<dt>UPPER THERMAL SHIELD</dt>
<dt>POLISHED ALUMINUM</dt>
<dt>LOUVERS</dt>
<dt>GOLD PLATE</dt>
<dt>BLACK PAINT</dt>
<dt>LOWER THERMAL SHIELD</dt>
<dt>WHITE PAINT</dt></dl>
<p>The six electronics cases on the hexagon structure were variously
treated, depending upon the power of the components contained in each.
Those of high power were coated with a good radiating surface of white
paint; assemblies of low power were provided with polished aluminum
shields to minimize the heat loss.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_35">35</div>
<p>The case housing the attitude control and CC&S electronics circuits
was particularly sensitive because the critical units might fail above
130 degrees F. A special assembly was mounted on the face of this case;
it consisted of eight movable, polished aluminum louvers, each actuated
by a coiled, temperature-sensitive, bimetallic element. When the temperature
rose, the elements acted as springs and opened the louvers. A drop
in temperature would close them.</p>
<p>Structures and bracket assemblies external to the basic hexagon were
gold plated if made of magnesium, or polished if aluminum. Thus protected,
these items became poor thermal radiators as well as poor solar
absorbers, making them relatively immune to solar radiation. External
cabling was wrapped in aluminized plastic to produce a similar effect.</p>
<p>The solar panels were painted on the shaded side for maximum radiation
control properties. Other items were designed so that the internal
surfaces were as efficient radiators as possible, thus conserving the spacecraft’s
heat balance.</p>
<h3 id="c22">THE SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS</h3>
<p>Four instruments were operated throughout the cruise and encounter
modes of Mariner: a magnetometer, a solar plasma detector, a cosmic
dust detector, and a combined charged-particle detector and radiation
counter. Two radiometers were used only in the immediate vicinity of
Venus.</p>
<p>These instruments are described in detail in <a href="#c44">Chapter 8</a>.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_36">36</div>
<h2 id="c23"><span class="smaller">CHAPTER</span> 4
<br />THE LAUNCH VEHICLE</h2>
<p>The motive power of Mariner itself was limited to a trajectory correction
rocket engine and an ability, by means of gas jets, to keep its two
critical faces pointing at the Sun and the Earth. Therefore, the spacecraft
had to be boosted out of the Earth’s gravitational field and injected
into a flight path accurate enough to allow the trajectory correction system
to alter the course to deliver the spacecraft close enough to Venus
to be within operating range of the scientific instruments.</p>
<p>The combined Atlas-Agena B booster system which was selected to do
the job had a total thrust of about 376,000 pounds. With this power,
Atlas-Agena could put 5,000 pounds of payload into a 345-mile orbit,
propel 750 pounds on a lunar trajectory, or launch approximately 400
pounds on a planetary mission. This last capability would be taxed to the
limit by the 447 pounds of the Mariner spacecraft.</p>
<h3 id="c24">THE ATLAS BOOSTER: POWER OF SIX 707’S</h3>
<p>The 360,000 pounds of thrust developed by the Atlas D missile is
equivalent to the thrust generated by the engines of six Boeing 707 jet
airplanes. All of this awesome power requires a gargantuan amount of
fuel: in less than 20 seconds, Atlas consumes more than a propeller-driven,
four-engine airplane burns in flying coast-to-coast nonstop.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_37">37</div>
<div class="img" id="fig20">
<img src="images/p014.jpg" alt="" width="428" height="800" />
<p class="pcap"><span class="center small"><i>Photo courtesy of General Dynamics/Astronautics</i></span>
<i>This military version of the Atlas missile is modified for NASA
space flights.</i></p>
</div>
<p>The Atlas missile, as developed by Convair for the Air Force, has a
range of 6,300 miles and reaches a top speed of 16,000 miles per hour.
The missile has been somewhat modified for use by NASA as a space
booster vehicle. Its mission was to lift the second-stage Agena B and the
Mariner spacecraft into the proper position and altitude at the right speed
so that the Agena could go into Earth orbit, preliminary to the takeoff
for interplanetary space.</p>
<p>The Atlas D has two main sections: a body or sustainer section, and a
jettisonable aft, or booster engine section. The vehicle measures about
100 feet in length (with military nose cone) and has a diameter of
10 feet at the base. The weight is approximately 275,000 pounds.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_38">38</div>
<p>No aerodynamic control surfaces such as fins or rudders are used. The
Atlas is stabilized and controlled by “gimbaling” or swiveling the engine
thrust chambers by means of a hydraulic system. The direction of thrust
can thus be altered to control the movements of the missile.</p>
<p>The aft section mounts two 154,500-pound-thrust booster engines and
the entire section is jettisoned or separated from the sustainer section
after the booster engines burn out. The 60,000-pound-thrust sustainer
engine is attached at the center line of the sustainer section. Two 1,000-pound-thrust
vernier (fine steering) engines are installed on opposite
sides of the tank section in the yaw or side-turn plane.</p>
<p>All three groups of engines operate during the booster phase. Only the
sustainer and the vernier engines burn after staging (when the booster
engine section is separated from the sustainer section of the missile).</p>
<p>All of the engines use liquid oxygen and a liquid hydrocarbon fuel
(RP-1) which is much like kerosene. Dual turbopumps and valves control
the flow of these propellants. The booster engine propellants are delivered
under pressure to the propellant or combustion chamber, where they are
ignited by electroexplosive devices. Each booster thrust chamber can be
swiveled a maximum of 5 degrees in pitch (up and down) and yaw
(from side to side) about the missile centerline.</p>
<p>The sustainer engine is deflected 3 degrees in pitch and yaw. The outboard
vernier engines gimbal to permit pitch and roll movement through
140 degrees of arc, and yaw movement through 20 degrees toward the
missile body and 30 degrees outward.</p>
<p>All three groups of engines are started and develop their full rated
thrust while the missile is held on the launch pad. After takeoff, the
booster engines burn out and are jettisoned. The sustainer engine continues
to burn until its thrust is terminated. The swiveled vernier engines
provide the final correction in velocity and missile attitude before they
are also shut down.</p>
<p>The propellant tank is the basic structure of the forward or sustainer
section of the Atlas. It is made of thin stainless steel and is approximately
50 feet long. Internal pressure of helium gas is used to support the tank
structure, thus eliminating the need for internal bracing structures, saving
considerable weight, and increasing over-all performance of the missile.
The helium gas used for this purpose is expanded to the proper pressure
by heat from the engines.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_39">39</div>
<p>Equipment pods on the outside of the sustainer section house the electrical
and electronic units and other components of the missile systems.</p>
<p>The Atlas uses a flight programmer, an autopilot, and the gimbaled
engine thrust chamber actuators for flight control. The attitude of the
vehicle is controlled by the autopilot, which is set for this automatic
function before the flight. Guidance commands are furnished by a ground
radio guidance system and computer.</p>
<p>The airborne radio inertial guidance system employs two radio beacons
which respond to the ground radar. A decoder on board the missile
processes the guidance commands.</p>
<h3 id="c25">THE AGENA B: START AND RESTART</h3>
<p>Launching Mariner to Venus required a second-stage vehicle capable
of driving the spacecraft out of Earth orbit and into a proper flight path
to the planet.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig21">
<img src="images/p015.jpg" alt="" width="528" height="801" />
<p class="pcap"><span class="center small"><i>Photo courtesy of Lockheed Missiles and Space Company</i></span>
<i>The Agena B second stage is hoisted to the top of the gantry at AMR.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_40">40</div>
<p>The Agena B used for this purpose weighs 1,700 pounds, is 60 inches
in diameter, and has an over-all length of 25 feet, varying somewhat with
the payload. The Agena B fuel tanks are made of 0.080-inch aluminum
alloy.</p>
<p>The liquid-burning engine develops more than 16,000 pounds of thrust.
The propellants are a form of hydrazine and red fuming nitric acid.</p>
<p>The Agena can be steered to a desired trajectory by swiveling the
gimbal-mounted engine on command of the guidance system. The attitude
of the vehicle is controlled either by gimbaling the engine or by
ejecting gas from pneumatic thrusters.</p>
<p>The Agena has the ability to restart its engine after it has already fired
once to reach an Earth orbital speed. This feature makes possible a significant
increase in payload and a change of orbital altitude. A velocity
meter ends the first and second burns when predetermined velocities have
been reached.</p>
<p>After engine cutoff, the major reorientation of the vehicle is achieved
through gas jets controlled from an electronic programming device. This
system can turn the Agena completely around in orbit, or pitch it down
for reentry into the atmosphere. The attitude is controlled by an infrared,
heat-sensitive horizon scanner and gyroscopes.</p>
<p>The principal modification to the Agena vehicle for the Mariner II
mission was an alteration to the spacecraft-Agena adapter in order to
reduce weight.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_41">41</div>
<h2 id="c26"><span class="smaller">CHAPTER</span> 5
<br />FLIGHT INTO SPACE</h2>
<p>With the Mariner R Project officially activated in the fall of 1961 and
the launch vehicles selected, engineers proceeded at full speed to meet
the difficult launch schedule.</p>
<p>A preliminary design was adopted in late September, when the scientific
experiments to be carried on board were also selected. By October 2,
a schedule had been established that would deliver two spacecraft to the
assembly building in Pasadena by January 15 and 29, 1962, respectively,
with the spares to follow in two weeks.</p>
<p>During the week of November 6, tests were underway to determine
problems involved in mating a mock-up of the spacecraft with the Agena
shroud and adapter assembly. A thermal control model of the spacecraft
had already gone into the small space simulator at JPL for preliminary
temperature tests.</p>
<p>MR-1, the first Mariner scheduled for flight, was in assembly immediately
after January 8, 1962, and the process was complete by the end of
the month, when electrical and magnetic field tests had been started. At
the same time, assembly of MR-2 was underway. Work on MR-1 was a
week ahead of schedule by the end of the month.</p>
<p>A full-scale temperature control model of the spacecraft went into the
large space simulator on February 26. In mid-March, system tests began
on both spacecraft and it was decided that the flight hardware would
be tested only in the small simulator, with the temperature control model
continuing in the large chamber.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_42">42</div>
<div class="img" id="fig22">
<img src="images/p016.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="886" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Technician wears hood and protective goggles while working on Mariner spacecraft
in Space simulator chamber at Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_43">43</div>
<p>On March 26, MR-1 was subjected to full-scale mating tests with the
shroud (cover) and the adapter for mounting the spacecraft on top of the
Agena. MR-2 was undergoing vibration tests during the week of April 16.
By April 30, MR-1 had completed vibration tests and had been mapped
for magnetic fields so that, once compensated for, they would not interfere
with the magnetometer experiment in space.</p>
<p>A dummy run of MR-1 was conducted on May 7 and the spacecraft,
space flight center, and computing equipment were put through a simulated
operations test run during the same week.</p>
<p>By May 14, clean-up and final inspection by microscope had begun on
MR-1, MR-2, and MR-3 (the latter spacecraft had been assembled from
the spares). Soon after, the first two van loads of equipment were shipped
to Cape Canaveral. The final system test of MR-1 was completed on
May 21 and the test of MR-2 followed during the same week.</p>
<p>During the week of May 28, all three spacecraft and their associated
ground support equipment were packed, loaded, and shipped to the
Atlantic Missile Range (AMR). At the same time, the Atlas designated to
launch MR-1 went aboard a C-133 freight aircraft at San Diego. On the
same day, an Air Force order grounded all C-133’s for inspection and the
plane did not depart until June 9.</p>
<p>By June 11, 1962, the firing dates had been established and both spacecraft
were ready for launching. The Atlas booster had already been
erected on the launch pad. The dummy run and a joint flight acceptance
test were completed on MR-1 during the week of July 2. Final flight
preparations and system test of MR-1 and the system test of MR-2 were
concluded a week later.</p>
<p>Thus, in 324 days, a new spacecraft project had been activated; the
design, assembly, and testing had been completed; and the infinite number
of decisions pertaining to launch, AMR Range Operations, deep-space
tracking, and data processing activities had been made and implemented.</p>
<p>Venus was approaching the Earth at the end of its 19-month excursion
around the Sun. The launch vehicles and Mariners I and II stood ready
to go from Canaveral’s Launch Complex 12. The events leading to the
first close-up look at Venus and intervening space were about to reach
their first crisis: a fiery explosion over the Atlantic Ocean.</p>
<h3 id="c27">MARINER I: AN ABORTIVE LAUNCH</h3>
<p>After 570 hours of testing, Mariner I was poised on top of the Atlas-Agena
launch vehicle during the night of July 20, 1962. The time was
<span class="pb" id="Page_44">44</span>
right, the Range and the tracking net were standing by, the launch
vehicles were ready to cast off the spacecraft for Venus.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig23">
<img src="images/p017.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="470" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Atlas for launching Mariner II arrives at Cape Canaveral in C-133 aircraft.</i></p>
</div>
<p>The countdown was begun at 11:33 p.m., EST, July 20, after several
delays because of trouble in the Range Safety Command system. At the
time, the launch count stood at T minus 176 minutes—if all went well,
176 minutes until the booster engines were ignited.</p>
<p>Another hold again delayed the count until 12:37 a.m., July 21, when
counting was resumed at T minus 165 minutes. The count then proceeded
without incident to T minus 79 minutes at 2:20 a.m., when uncertainty
over the cause of a blown fuse in the Range Safety circuits caused the
operations to be “scrubbed” or cancelled for the night. The next launch
attempt was scheduled for July 21-22.</p>
<p>The second launch countdown for Mariner I began shortly before midnight,
July 21. Spacecraft power had been turned on at 11:08 p.m., with
the launch count at T minus 200 minutes. At T minus 135 minutes, the
weather looked good. A 41-minute hold was required at minus 130 minutes
(12:17 a.m., July 22) in order to change a noisy component in the
ground tracking system.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_45">45</div>
<p>When counting was resumed at T minus 130 minutes, the clock read
12:48 a.m. A previously scheduled hold was called at T minus 60 minutes,
lasting from 1:58 to 2:38 a.m. The good weather still held.</p>
<p>At T minus 80 seconds, power fluctuations in the radio guidance system
forced a 34-minute hold. Time was resumed at 4:16 a.m., when the
countdown was set back to T minus 5 minutes.</p>
<p>At exactly 4:21.23 a.m., EST, the Atlas thundered to life and lifted off
the pad, bearing its Venus-bound load. The boost phase looked good
until the Range Safety officer began to notice an unscheduled yaw-left
(northeast) maneuver. By 4:25 a.m., it was evident that, if allowed to
continue, the vehicle might crash in the North Atlantic shipping lanes
or in some inhabited area. Steering commands were being supplied but
faulty application of the guidance equations was taking the vehicle far
off course.</p>
<p>Finally, at 4:26.16 a.m., after 293 seconds of flight and with just 6 seconds
left before separation of the Atlas and Agena—after which the
launch vehicle could not be destroyed—a Range Safety officer hit the
“destruct” button.</p>
<p>A flash of light illuminated the sky and the choppy Atlantic waters
were awash with the glowing death of a space probe. Even as it fluttered
down to the sea, however, the radio transponder of the shattered Mariner I
continued to transmit for 1 minute and 4 seconds after the destroy command
had been sent.</p>
<p>Mariner I did not succumb easily.</p>
<h3 id="c28">MARINER II: A ROLL BEFORE PARKING</h3>
<p>Ever since Mariner II had arrived at the Cape on June 4, test teams of
all organizations had labored day and night to prepare the spacecraft for
launch. The end of their efforts culminated after some 690 hours of test
time, both in California and in Florida.</p>
<p>Thirty-five days after Mariner I met its explosive end, the first countdown
on Mariner II was underway. At 6:43 p.m., EST, August 25, 1962,
time was picked up. The countdown did not proceed far, however. The
Atlas crew asked for a hold at T minus 205 minutes (8:39 p.m.) because
of stray voltages in the command destruct system caused by a defective
Agena battery. After considerable delay, the launch effort was scrubbed
at 10:06 p.m.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_46">46</div>
<div class="img" id="fig24">
<img src="images/p018.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="786" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Two assembly operations and system checkouts are performed
separated by a trip to the pad to verify compatibility with the launch vehicle</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig25">
<img src="images/p018a.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="594" />
<p class="pcap"><i>A complete electronic checkout station in the hangar
supports the spacecraft to ensure operability</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_47">47</div>
<div class="img" id="fig26">
<img src="images/p018e.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="684" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Mariner takes form as the solar panels are attached and the final hangar
checkout operations are performed before the launch.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig27">
<img src="images/p018f.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="376" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Wrapped in a dust cover, the spacecraft is transferred from Hangar AE at
AMR to the explosive safe area for further tests.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_48">48</div>
<div class="img" id="fig28">
<img src="images/p019.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="494" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Inside the bunker-like explosive safe area, the powerful midcourse maneuver
rocket engine is installed in the center of the spacecraft.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig29">
<img src="images/p019b.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="855" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Final assembly and inspection complete, Mariner is
“canned” in the nose shroud that will protect it through
the Earth’s atmosphere and into space.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_49">49</div>
<div class="img" id="fig30">
<img src="images/p019c.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="904" />
<p class="pcap"><i>At the pad, the shrouded spacecraft is lifted past the Atlas ...</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig31">
<img src="images/p019d.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="770" />
<p class="pcap"><i>... and the Agena.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_50">50</div>
<div class="img" id="fig32">
<img src="images/p020.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="980" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Twelfth floor: Mariner reaches its mating level.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_51">51</div>
<div class="img" id="fig33">
<img src="images/p020a.jpg" alt="" width="595" height="775" />
<p class="pcap"><i>The spacecraft is eased over to the top of the Agena ...</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig34">
<img src="images/p020b.jpg" alt="" width="598" height="562" />
<p class="pcap"><i>... and carefully mated to it.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_52">52</div>
<p>The second launch attempt started at 6:37 p.m., August 26, with the
Atlas-Agena B and Mariner II ready on the pad. At 9:52 p.m., T minus
100 minutes, a 40-minute hold was called to replace the Atlas main battery.
By 10:37, with 95 minutes to launch, all spacecraft systems were
ready to go.</p>
<p>A routine hold at T minus 60 minutes was extended beyond 30 minutes
in order to verify the spacecraft battery life expectation. At 11:48
p.m., with the count standing at T minus 55 minutes, the spacecraft, the
vehicles, the Range, and the DSIF were all given the green light.</p>
<p>When good launching weather was reported at 12:18 a.m., August 27,
just 25 minutes from liftoff, a cautious optimism began to mount in the
blockhouse and among the tired crews.</p>
<p>But the tension began to build again. The second prescheduled hold
at T minus 5 minutes was extended beyond a half-hour when the radio
guidance system had difficulty with ground station power. Counting was
“picked up” and the clock continued to move down to 60 seconds before
liftoff.</p>
<p>Suddenly, the radio guidance system was in trouble again. Fluctuations
showed in its rate beacon signals, and another hold was called. Still
another hold for the same reason followed at T minus 50 seconds. This
time, at 1:30 a.m., the count was set back to T minus 5 minutes.</p>
<p>One further crisis developed during this hold—only 3 minutes of pre-launch
life remained in Atlas’ main battery. A quick decision was made
to hold the switchover to missile power until T minus 60 seconds to help
conserve the life of the battery.</p>
<p>At 1:48 a.m., the count was resumed again at T minus 5 minutes. The
long seconds began to drag. Finally, the Convair test director pressed
the fire button.</p>
<p>Out on the launch pad, the Atlas engines ignited with a white puff
and began to strain against the retaining bolts as 360,000 pounds of
thrust began to build up. In a holocaust of noise and flame, the Atlas was
released and lifted off the launch pad on a bearing of 106.8 degrees at exactly
1 hour, 53 minutes, 13.927 seconds in the morning of August 27, 1962.</p>
<p>Mariner II was on its way to listen to the music of the spheres.</p>
<p>As the launch vehicle roared up into the night sky, the JPL Launch
Checkout Station (DSIF O) tracked the spacecraft until Mariner disappeared
over the horizon. A quick, preliminary evaluation of spacecraft
data showed normal readings and Atlas seemed to be flying a true course.
<span class="pb" id="Page_53">53</span>
The AMR in-flight data transmission and computational operations were
being performed as expected. With liftoff out of the way, the launch
began to look good.</p>
<p>After the radio signal from the ground guidance system cut off the
engines and the booster section was jettisoned, the remaining Atlas forward
section, plus the Agena and the spacecraft began to roll. However,
it stabilized itself in a normal attitude. Although the Atlas had not gone
out of the Range Safety restrictions, it was within just 3 degrees of
exceeding the Agena horizon sensor limits, which would have forced
another aborted mission.</p>
<p>After the booster separation, the Atlas sustainer and vernier engines
continued to burn until they were shut off by radio guidance command.
Shortly thereafter, spring-loaded bolts ejected the nose-cone shroud which
had protected the spacecraft against frictional heating in the atmosphere.
Simultaneously, the gyroscopes in the Agena were started and, at about
1:58 a.m., the Agena and the spacecraft separated from the now-spent
Atlas, which was retarded by small retro-rockets and drifted back into
the atmosphere, where it was destroyed by friction on reentry.</p>
<h3 id="c29">THE PARKING ORBIT</h3>
<p>As the Agena separated from the Atlas booster vehicle, it was programmed
to pitch down almost 15 degrees, putting it roughly parallel
with the local horizon. Then, following a brief coasting period, the Agena
engine ignited at 1:58.53 a.m. and fired until 2:01.12 a.m. Cut-off
occurred at a predetermined value of velocity. Both the Agena and the
spacecraft had now reached a speed of approximately 18,000 miles per
hour and had gone into an Earth orbit at an altitude of 116.19 statute miles.</p>
<p>The second stage and the spacecraft were now in a “parking orbit,”
which would allow the vehicle to coast out to a point more favorable than
Cape Canaveral for blasting off Mariner for Venus.</p>
<p>During the launch, Cape radar had tracked the radar beacon on the
Agena, losing it on the horizon at 2:00.53 a.m. Radar stations at Grand
Bahama Island, San Salvador, Ascension, the Twin Falls Victory ship, and
Pretoria (in South Africa) continued to track down range. Meanwhile,
Antigua had “locked on” and tracked the spacecraft’s radio transponder
and telemetry from 1:58 to 2:08 a.m. when it went over the Antigua
horizon.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_54">54</div>
<div class="img" id="fig35">
<img src="images/p021.jpg" alt="" width="962" height="600" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Mariner II is accelerated to Earth-escape velocity and out of orbit near St. Helena. Rotation of earth causes flight path to
appear to double back to west over Africa.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_55">55</div>
<div class="img" id="fig36">
<img src="images/p021a.jpg" alt="" width="683" height="600" />
<p class="pcap"><i>The sequence of events in the launch phase of the Mariner flight to Venus.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dd class="t">EVENT</dd>
<dt>1. LIFTOFF</dt>
<dt>2. ATLAS BOOSTER ENGINE CUTOFF</dt>
<dt>3. ATLAS SUSTAINER ENGINE CUTOFF</dt>
<dt>4. ATLAS VERNIER ENGINE CUTOFF</dt>
<dt>5. SPACECRAFT SHROUD EJECTION</dt>
<dt>6. ATLAS-AGENA B SEPARATION</dt>
<dt>7. AGENA B FIRST IGNITION</dt>
<dt>8. AGENA B FIRST CUTOFF</dt>
<dt>9. AGENA B SECOND IGNITION</dt>
<dt>10. AGENA B SECOND CUTOFF</dt>
<dt>11. SPACECRAFT SEPARATION</dt>
<dt>12. INITIATE AGENA YAW MANEUVER</dt>
<dt>13. COMPLETE AGENA YAW MANEUVER</dt>
<dt>14. EXPEL UNUSED AGENA PROPELLANT</dt></dl>
<p>The second coasting period lasted 16.3 minutes, a time determined by
the ground guidance computer and transmitted to the Agena during the
vernier burning period of Atlas. Then, Agena restarted its engine and
fired for a second time. At the end of this firing period, both the Agena
and Mariner, still attached, had been injected into a transfer trajectory
to Venus at a velocity exceeding that required to escape from the Earth’s
gravity.</p>
<p>The actual injection into space occurred at 26 minutes 3.08 seconds
after liftoff from the Cape (2:19.19 a.m., EST) at a point above 14.873
degrees south latitude and 2.007 degrees west longitude. Thus, Mariner
made the break for Venus about 360 miles northeast of St. Helena, 2,500
miles east of the Brazilian coast, and about 900 miles west of Angola on
the west African shore.</p>
<p>During injection, the vehicle was being tracked by Ascension, telemetry
ship Twin Falls Victory, and Pretoria. Telemetry ship Whiskey secured
the spacecraft signal just after injection and tracked until 2:26 a.m.
Pretoria began its telemetry track at 2:21 and continued to track for
almost two hours, until 4:19 a.m.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_56">56</div>
<p>Injection velocity was 7.07 miles per second or 25,420 miles per hour,
just beyond Earth-escape speed. The distance at the time of injection
from Canaveral’s Launch Complex 12 was 4,081.3 miles.</p>
<p>The Agena and Mariner flew the escape path together for another two
minutes after injection before they were separated at 2:21 a.m. Agena then
performed a 140-degree yaw or retro-turn maneuver by expelling unused
propellants. The purpose was to prevent the unsterilized Agena from
possibly hitting the planet, and from following Mariner too closely and
perhaps disturbing its instruments.</p>
<p>Now, Mariner II was flying alone and clear. Ahead lay a journey of
109 days and more than 180 million miles.</p>
<h3 id="c30">ORIENTATION AND MIDCOURSE MANEUVER</h3>
<p>As Mariner II headed into space, the Deep Space Instrumentation
Facility (DSIF) network began to track the spacecraft. At 2:23.59 a.m.,
DSIF 5 at Johannesburg, aided by the Mobile Tracking Station, installed
in vans in the vicinity, was “looking” at the spacecraft, just four minutes
after injection.</p>
<p>Johannesburg was able to track Mariner until 4:04 p.m. because, as the
trajectory took Mariner almost radially away from the Earth, our planet
began in effect to turn away from under the spacecraft. On an Earth map,
because of its course and the rotation of the Earth, Mariner II appeared
to describe a great arc over the Indian Ocean far to the west of Australia,
then to turn north and west and to proceed straight west over south-central
Africa, across the Atlantic, and over the Amazon Basin of northern
South America. Johannesburg finally lost track at a point over the middle
of South America.</p>
<p>While swinging over the Indian Ocean on its first pass, the spacecraft
was acquired by Woomera’s DSIF 4 at 2:42.30 a.m., and tracked until
8:08 a.m., when Mariner was passing just to the north of Madagascar on
a westerly course. Goldstone did not acquire the spacecraft until it was
approaching the east coast of South America at 3:12 p.m., August 27.</p>
<p>With Mariner slowly tumbling in free space, it was now necessary to
initiate a series of events to place the spacecraft in the proper flight position.
At 2:27 a.m., 44 minutes after launch, the Mariner Central Computer
and Sequencer (CC&S) on board the spacecraft issued a command for
explosively activated pin pullers to release the solar panels and the
radiometer dish from their launch-secured positions. At 2:53, 60 minutes
after liftoff, the attitude control system was turned on and the Sun orientation
sequence began with the extension of the directional antenna to a
preset angle of 72 degrees.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_57">57</div>
<div class="img" id="fig37">
<img src="images/p022.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="511" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Mariner II was launched while Venus was far behind the Earth. During the
109-day flight, Venus overtook and passed the Earth. It rendezvoused with the
spacecraft at a point about 36,000,000 miles from the Earth.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig38">
<img src="images/p022a.jpg" alt="" width="782" height="600" />
<p class="pcap"><i>During the midcourse maneuver, the trajectory of Mariner II was corrected so
that the spacecraft would approach within 21,598 miles of Venus.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dt>ROLL MANEUVER ANTENNA UP</dt>
<dt>PITCH MANEUVER</dt>
<dt>MOTOR BURN</dt>
<dt>SUN REAQUISITION ANTENNA REPOSITION</dt>
<dt>EARTH REAQUISITION</dt></dl>
<div class="pb" id="Page_58">58</div>
<p>The Sun sensors then activated the gas jets and moved the spacecraft
about until the roll or long axis was pointed at the Sun. This maneuver
required only 2½ minutes after the CC&S issued the command. The
solar panel power output of 195 watts was somewhat higher than anticipated,
as were the spacecraft temperatures, which decreased and stabilized
six hours after the spacecraft oriented itself on the Sun.</p>
<p>On August 29, a command from Johannesburg turned on the cruise
scientific experiments, including all the instruments except the two radiometers.
The rate of data transmission was then observed to decrease as
planned and the data conditioning system was functioning normally.</p>
<p>For seven days, no attempt was made to orient the spacecraft with
respect to the Earth because the Earth sensors were too sensitive to
operate properly at such a close range. On September 3, the CC&S initiated
the Earth acquisition sequence. The gyroscopes were turned on, the cruise
scientific instruments were temporarily switched off, and a search for the
Earth began about the roll axis of the spacecraft.</p>
<p>During this maneuver, the long axis of the spacecraft was held steady
in a position pointing at the Sun and the gas jets rolled the spacecraft
around this axis until the sensors, mounted in the directional antenna,
could “see” the Earth. Apparently, the Earth sensor was already viewing
the Earth because the transmitter output immediately switched from the
omni- to the directional antenna, indicating that no search was necessary.</p>
<p>However, the initial brightness reading from the Earth sensor was 38,
an intensity that might be expected if the spacecraft were locked onto the
Moon instead of the Earth. As a result, the midcourse maneuver was
delayed until verification of Earth lock was obtained.</p>
<p>Mariner’s injection into the Venus trajectory yielded a predicted miss
of 233,000 miles in front of the planet, well within the normal miss pattern
expected as a result of the launch. Because the spacecraft was designed
to cross the orbit of Venus behind the planet and pass between it and the
Sun, it was necessary to correct the trajectory to an approximate 8,000- to
40,000-mile “fly-by” so the scientific instruments could operate within
their design ranges.</p>
<p>After comparison of the actual flight path with that required for a
proper near-miss, the necessary roll, pitch, and motor-burn commands
<span class="pb" id="Page_59">59</span>
were generated by the JPL computers. When, on September 4, it had
been established that the spacecraft was indeed oriented on the Earth
and not the Moon, a set of three commands was transmitted to the spacecraft
from Goldstone, to be stored in the electronic “memory unit” until
the start command was sent.</p>
<p>At 1:30 p.m., PST, the first commands were transmitted: a 9.33-degree
roll turn, a 139.83-degree pitch turn, and a motor-burn command to
produce a 69.5-mile-per-hour velocity change.</p>
<p>At 2:39 p.m., a fourth command was sent to switch from the directional
antenna to the omni-antenna. Finally, a command went out instructing
the spacecraft to proceed with the now “memorized” maneuver program.</p>
<p>Mariner then turned off the Earth and Sun sensors, moved the directional
antenna out of the path of the rocket exhaust stream, and executed
a 9.33-degree roll turn in 51 seconds.</p>
<p>Next, the pitch turn was completed in 13¼ minutes, turning the spacecraft
almost completely around so the motor nozzle would point in the
correct direction when fired.</p>
<p>The spacecraft was stabilized and the roll and pitch turns controlled
by gyroscopes, which signalled the attitude control system the rate of
correction for comparison with the already computed values.</p>
<p>With the solar panels no longer directly oriented on the Sun, the battery
began to share the power demand and finally carried the entire load
until the spacecraft had again been oriented on the Sun.</p>
<p>At the proper time, the motor—controlled by the CC&S—ignited and
burned for 27.8 seconds, while the spacecraft’s acceleration was compared
with the predetermined values by the accelerometer. During this
period, when the gas jets could not operate properly, the spacecraft was
stabilized by movable vanes or rudders in the exhaust of the midcourse
motor.</p>
<p>The velocity added by the midcourse motor resulted in a decrease of
the relative speed of the spacecraft with respect to the Earth by 59 miles
per hour (from 6,748 to 6,689 miles per hour), while the speed relative
to the Sun increased by 45 miles per hour (from 60,117 to 60,162 miles
per hour).</p>
<p>This apparently paradoxical condition occurred because, in order to
intercept Venus, Mariner had been launched in a direction opposite to
the Earth’s course around the Sun. The midcourse maneuver turned the
spacecraft around and slowed its travel away from the Earth while allowing
<span class="pb" id="Page_60">60</span>
it to increase its speed around the Sun in the direction of the Earth’s
orbit. Gradually, then, the spacecraft would begin to fall in toward the
Sun while moving in the same direction as the Earth, catching and passing
the Earth on the 65th day and intersecting Venus’ orbit on the 109th day.</p>
<p>At the time of the midcourse maneuver, the spacecraft was travelling
slightly inside the Earth’s orbit by 70,000 miles, and was behind the
Earth by 1,492,500 miles.</p>
<h3 id="c31">THE LONG CRUISE</h3>
<p>After its completion of the midcourse maneuver, Mariner reoriented
itself on the Sun in 7 minutes and on the Earth in about 30 minutes.
During the midcourse maneuver, the omnidirectional antenna was used;
now, with the maneuver completed, the directional antenna was switched
back in for the duration of the mission.</p>
<p>Ever since the spacecraft had left the parking orbit near the Earth and
been injected into the Venus trajectory, the Space Flight Operations
Center back in Pasadena had been the nerve center of the mission. Telemetered
data had been coming in from the DSIF stations on a 24-hour
schedule. During the cruise phase, from September 5 to December 7, a
total of 16 orbit computations were made to perfect the planet encounter
prediction. On December 7, the first noticeable Venus-caused effects on
Mariner’s trajectory were observed, causing a definite deviation of the
spacecraft’s flight path.</p>
<p>On September 8, at 12:50 p.m., EST, the spacecraft lost its attitude
control, which caused the power serving the scientific instruments to
switch off and the gyroscopes to switch on automatically for approximately
three minutes, after which normal operation was resumed. The
cause was not apparent but the chances of a strike by some small space
object seemed good.</p>
<p>As a result of this event, a significant difference in the apparent brightness
reading of the Earth sensor was noted. This sensor had been causing
concern for some time because its readings had decreased to almost
zero. Further decrease, if actually caused by the instrument and not by
the telemetry sensing elements, could result in loss of Earth lock and the
failure of radio contact.</p>
<p>After the incident of September 8, the Earth sensor brightness reading
increased from 6 to 63, a normal indication for that day. Thereafter, this
<span class="pb" id="Page_61">61</span>
measurement decreased in an expected manner as the spacecraft increased
its distance from the Earth.</p>
<p>Mariner II was now embarked on the long cruise. On September 12,
the distance from the Earth was 2,678,960 miles and the spacecraft speed
relative to the Earth was 6,497 miles per hour. Mariner was accelerating
its speed as the Sun’s gravity began to exert a stronger pull than the
Earth’s. On October 3, Mariner was nearly 6 million miles out and
moving at 6,823 miles per hour relative to the Earth. A total of 55,600,000
miles had been covered to that point.</p>
<p>Considerable anxiety had developed at JPL when Mariner’s Earth
sensor reading had fallen off so markedly. This situation was relieved
by the unexplained return to normal on September 8, although the day-to-day
change in the brightness number was watched closely. The apparent
ability of the spacecraft to recover its former performance after the loss
of attitude control on September 8 and again on September 29 was an
encouraging sign.</p>
<p>Another disturbing event occurred on October 31, when the output
from one solar panel deteriorated abruptly. The entire power load was
thrown on the other panel, which was then dangerously near its maximum
rated output. To alleviate this situation, the cruise scientific instruments
were turned off. A week later, the malfunctioning panel returned
to normal operation and the science instruments were again turned on.
Although the trouble had cleared temporarily, it developed again on
November 15 and never again corrected itself. The diagnosis was a partial
short circuit between one string of solar cells and the panel frame, but
by now the spacecraft was close enough to the Sun so that one panel
supplied enough power.</p>
<p>By October 24, the spacecraft was 10,030,000 miles from the Earth
and was moving at 10,547 miles per hour relative to the Earth. The
distance from Venus was now 21,266,000 miles.</p>
<p>October 30 was the 65th day of the mission and at 5 a.m., PST, Mariner
overtook and passed the Earth at a distance of 11,500,000 miles. Since
the spacecraft’s direction of travel had, in effect, been reversed by the
midcourse maneuver, it had been gaining on the Earth in the direction
of its orbit, although constantly falling away from the Earth in the
direction of the Sun.</p>
<p>The point of equal distance between the Earth and Venus was passed
on November 6, when Mariner was 13,900,000 miles from both planets
<span class="pb" id="Page_62">62</span>
and travelling at 13,843 miles per hour relative to the Earth. As November
wore on, hope for a successful mission began to mount. Using tracking data
rather than assumptions of standard midcourse performance, the Venus
miss distance had now been revised to about 21,000 miles and encounter
was predicted for December 14. But the DSIF tracking crews, the space
flight and computer operators, and the management staff could not yet
relax. The elation following the successful trajectory correction maneuver
on September 4 had given way alternately to discouragement and
guarded optimism.</p>
<p>Four telemetry measurements were lost on December 9 and never returned
to normal. They measured the angle of the antenna hinge, the fuel
tank pressure, and the nitrogen pressure in the midcourse and attitude
control systems. A blown fuse, designed to protect the data encoder from
short circuits in the sensors, was suspected. However, these channels
could not affect spacecraft operation and Mariner continued to perform
normally.</p>
<p>The rising temperatures recorded on the spacecraft were more serious.
Only the solar panels were displaying expected temperature readings;
some of the others were as much as 75 degrees above the values predicted
for Venus encounter. The heat increase became more rapid after
November 20. By December 12, six of the temperature sensors had
reached their upper limits. It was feared that the failure point of the
equipment might be exceeded.</p>
<p>The CC&S performed without incident until just before encounter,
when, for the first time, it failed to yield certain pulses. JPL engineers
were worried about the starting of the encounter sequence, due the next
day, although they knew that Earth-based radio could send these commands,
if necessary.</p>
<p>On December 12, with the climax of the mission near, the spacecraft
was 34,218,000 miles from the Earth, with a speed away from the Earth
of 35,790 miles per hour, a Sun-relative speed of 83,900 miles per hour.</p>
<p>Only 635,525 miles from Venus at this point, Mariner II was closing
fast on the cloud-shrouded planet. But it was a hot spacecraft that was
carrying its load of inquisitive instruments to the historic encounter.</p>
<h3 id="c32">ENCOUNTER AND BEYOND</h3>
<p>On its 109th day of travel, Mariner had approached Venus in a precarious
condition. Seven of the over-heated temperature sensors had
<span class="pb" id="Page_63">63</span>
reached their upper telemetry limits. The Earth-sensor brightness reading
stood at 3 (0 was the nominal threshold) and was dropping. Some
149 watts of power were being consumed out of the 165 watts still
available from the crippled solar panels.</p>
<p>At JPL’s Space Flight Operations Center, there was reason to believe
that the ailing CC&S might not command the spacecraft into its encounter
sequence at the proper time. Twelve hours before encounter, these fears
were verified.</p>
<p>Quickly, the emergency Earth-originated command was prepared for
transmission. At 5:35 a.m., PST, a radio signal went out from Goldstone’s
Echo Station. Thirty-six million miles away, Mariner II responded to the
tiny pulse of energy from the Earth and began its encounter sequence.</p>
<p>After Mariner had “acknowledged” receipt of the command from the
Earth, the spacecraft switched into the encounter sequence as engineering
data were turned off and the radiometers began their scanning motion,
taking up-and-down readings across the face of the planet. As throughout
the long cruise, the four experiments monitoring the magnetic fields,
cosmic dust, charged particles, and solar plasma experiments continued
to operate.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig39">
<img src="images/p023.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="570" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Mariner II approached Venus from the dark side, crossed between the planet
and the Sun while making three radiometer scans of the disk.</i></p>
</div>
<p>As Mariner approached Venus on its night side, it was travelling about
88,400 miles per hour with respect to the Sun. At the point of closest
<span class="pb" id="Page_64">64</span>
approach, at 11:59.28 a.m., PST, the distance from the planet was
21,598 miles.</p>
<p>During encounter with Venus, three scans were made: one on the dark
side, one across the terminator dividing dark and sunlit sides, and one on
the sunlit side. Although the scan went slightly beyond the edge of the
planet, the operation proceeded smoothly and good data were received
on the Earth.</p>
<p>With encounter completed, the cruise condition was reestablished by
radio command from the Earth and the spacecraft returned to transmitting
engineering data, together with the continuing readings of the four
cruise scientific experiments.</p>
<p>After approaching closer to a planet and making more meaningful scientific
measurements than any man-made space probe, Mariner II continued
on into an orbit around the Sun.</p>
<p>December 27, 13 days after Venus encounter, marked the perihelion,
or point of Mariner’s closest approach to the Sun: 65,505,935 miles. The
Sun-related speed was 89,442 miles per hour. As Mariner began to pull
away from the Sun in the following months, its Sun-referenced speed
would decrease.</p>
<p>Data were still being received during these final days and the Earth
and Sun lock were still being maintained. Although the antenna hinge
angle was no longer being automatically readjusted by the spacecraft,
commands were sent from the Earth in an attempt to keep the antenna
pointed at the Earth, even if the Earth sensor were no longer operating
properly.</p>
<p>At 2 a.m., EST, January 3, 1963, 20 days after passing Venus, Mariner
finished transmitting 30 minutes of telemetry data to Johannesburg and
the station shut down its operation. When Woomera’s DSIF 4 later made
a normal search for the spacecraft signal, it could not be found. Goldstone
also searched in vain for the spacecraft transmissions, but apparently
Mariner’s voice had at last died, although the spacecraft would go into
an eternal orbit around the Sun.</p>
<p>It was estimated that Mariner’s aphelion (farthest point out) in its
orbit around the Sun would occur on June 18, 1963, at a distance of
113,813,087 miles. Maximum distance from the Earth would be 98,063,599
miles on March 30, 1963; closest approach to the Earth: 25,765,717 miles
on September 27, 1963.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_65">65</div>
<h3 id="c33">THE RECORD OF MARINER</h3>
<p>The performance record of Mariner II exceeded that of any spacecraft
previously launched from Earth:</p>
<ul><li>It performed the first and most distant trajectory-correcting maneuver in deep space, firing a rocket motor at the greatest distance from the Earth: 1,492,000 miles (September 4, 1962).</li>
<li>The spacecraft transmitted continuously for four months, sending back to the Earth some 90 million bits of information while using only 3 watts of transmitted power.</li>
<li>Useful telemetry measurements were made at another record distance from the Earth: 53.9 million miles (January 3, 1963).</li>
<li>Mariner II was the first spacecraft to operate in the immediate vicinity of another planet and return useful scientific information to the Earth: approximately 21,598 miles from Venus (December 14, 1962).</li>
<li>Measurements were made closest to the Sun: 65.3 million miles away (December 27, 1962).</li>
<li>Mariner’s communication system operated for the longest continuous period in interplanetary space: 129 days (August 27, 1962, to January 3, 1963).</li>
<li>Mariner achieved the longest continuous operation of a spacecraft attitude-stabilization system in space, and at a greater distance from the Earth than any previous spacecraft: 129 days (August 27, 1962, to January 3, 1963), at 53.9 million miles from the Earth.</li></ul>
<div class="pb" id="Page_66">66</div>
<h2 id="c34"><span class="smaller">CHAPTER</span> 6
<br />THE TRACKING NETWORK</h2>
<p>Thirty-six million miles separated the Earth from Venus at encounter.
Communicating with Mariner II and tracking it out to this distance, and
beyond, represented a tremendous extension of man’s ability to probe
interplanetary space.</p>
<p>The problem involved:</p>
<dl class="undent"><dt>1. The establishment of the spacecraft’s velocity and position relative to the Earth, Venus, and the Sun with high precision.</dt>
<dt>2. The transmission of commands to activate spacecraft maneuvers.</dt>
<dt>3. The reception of readable spacecraft engineering and scientific data from the far-ranging Mariner.</dt></dl>
<p>The tracking network had to contend with many radio noise sources:
the noise from the solar system and from extragalactic origins; noise originating
from the Earth and its atmosphere; and the inherent interference
originating in the receiving equipment. These problems were solved by
using advanced high-gain antennas and ultra-stable, extremely sensitive
receiving equipment.</p>
<h3 id="c35">DEEP SPACE INSTRUMENTATION FACILITY</h3>
<p>The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has constructed a
network of deep-space tracking stations for lunar and planetary exploration
<span class="pb" id="Page_67">67</span>
missions. In order to provide continuous, 24-hour coverage, three
stations were built, approximately 120 degrees of longitude apart, around
the world: at Goldstone in the California desert, near Johannesburg in
South Africa, and at Woomera in the south-central Australian desert.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig40">
<img src="images/p024.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="554" />
<p class="pcap"><i>The three tracking stations of the Deep Space Instrumentation Facility are
located around the world so as to provide continuous flight coverage.</i></p>
</div>
<p>These stations are the basic elements of the Deep Space Instrumentation
Facility (DSIF). In addition, a mobile tracking station installed
in vans is used near the point of injection of a spacecraft into an Earth-escape
trajectory to assist the permanent stations in finding the spacecraft
and to acquire tracking data. The control point for the DSIF net is
located at JPL in Pasadena, California (see <a href="#table1">Table 1</a>).</p>
<p>The Jet Propulsion Laboratory has the responsibility for the technical
direction of the entire DSIF net and operates the Goldstone facilities with
assistance from the Bendix Corporation as a subcontractor. The overseas
stations are staffed and operated by agencies of the Republic of South
Africa and the Commonwealth of Australia.</p>
<p>The DSIF net tracks the position and velocity of U.S. deep-space
probes, issues commands to direct the spacecraft in flight, receives engineering
and scientific data from the probes, and automatically relays the
<span class="pb" id="Page_68">68</span>
data to JPL in Pasadena, where it is processed by computers and interpreted.
(In the tracking operation, a signal is transmitted to the spacecraft,
where it is received and processed in a transponder, which then
sends the signal back to the Earth. The change in frequency, known as
the doppler effect, involved in this operation enables engineers to determine
the velocity at which the spacecraft is moving.)</p>
<h4 id="table1"><i>Table 1. Deep Space Instrumentation Facility Stations</i></h4>
<table class="center" summary="">
<tr class="th"><th><i>Station</i> </th><th><i>Location</i> </th><th><i>Equipment</i> </th><th><i>Functions</i></th></tr>
<tr><td class="l">DSIF 1 (Mobile Tracking Station) </td><td class="l">Near point of injection of spacecraft into Earth-escape trajectory </td><td class="l">10-ft antenna 25-w, 890-mc transmitter </td><td class="l">Fast tracking for acquisition of spacecraft</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Goldstone: </td><td class="l">California </td><td class="l"> </td><td class="l"> </td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="l"><span class="hst">Pioneer Site (DSIF 2)</span> </td><td class="l"> </td><td class="l">85-ft polar-mount antenna; Cassegrain feed; maser and parametric amplifier </td><td class="l">Reception of telemetry<br />Tracking spacecraft</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l"><span class="hst">Echo Site (DSIF 3)</span> </td><td class="l"> </td><td class="l">85-ft polar-mount antenna; parametric amplifier<br />10-kw, 890-mc transmitter </td><td class="l">Transmission of commands<br />Tracking spacecraft<br />Stand-by reception</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l"><span class="hst">Venus Site</span> </td><td class="l"> </td><td class="l">85-ft radar-type antenna </td><td class="l">Advanced radar astronomy<br />Communications research</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">DSIF 4 </td><td class="l">Woomera, Australia </td><td class="l">85-ft polar-mount antenna; parametric amplifier </td><td class="l">Reception of telemetry<br />Tracking spacecraft</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">DSIF 5 </td><td class="l">Johannesburg, South Africa </td><td class="l">85-ft polar-mount antenna; parametric amplifier<br />10-kw, 890-mc transmitter </td><td class="l">Reception of telemetry<br />Tracking spacecraft<br />Transmission of commands</td></tr>
</table>
<div class="pb" id="Page_69">69</div>
<p>The stations are equipped with receiving and tracking instruments so
sensitive that engineers estimate that they can detect radio-frequency
energy equivalent to that radiated by a 1-watt light bulb at a distance of
approximately 75 to 80 million miles. Such energy received at the antenna
would measure about 0.00000000000000000002 watt (2 × 10⁻²⁰).</p>
<p>The amount of power received at the antenna during Mariner’s encounter
with Venus has been calculated at about 0.000000000000000001 of
a watt (1 × 10⁻¹⁸). If a 100 percent efficient storage battery were
charged with this amount of energy for some 30 billion years, the battery
would then have stored enough energy to light an ordinary 1-watt flashlight
bulb for about 1 second only.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Goldstone engineers estimate that, if Mariner II had continued
to function in all its systems and to point its directional antenna
at the Earth, useful telemetry data could have been obtained by the
DSIF stations out to about 150 to 200 million miles, and tracking data
could have been secured from as far as 300 to 400 million miles.</p>
<p>Construction of the DSIF net was begun in 1958. The Goldstone station
was ready for the Pioneer III mission in December of that year.
In March, 1959, Pioneer IV was successfully tracked beyond the Moon.
Later in 1959, Pioneer V was tracked out to over 3 million miles.</p>
<p>Goldstone participated in the 1960 Project Echo communication satellite
experiments and the entire net was used in the Ranger lunar missions
of 1961-1962. The Goldstone station performed Venus radar experiments
in 1961 and 1962 to determine the astronomical unit more precisely and
to study the rotation rate and surface characteristics of the planet.</p>
<p>Following the launch of Mariner II on August 27, 1962, the full DSIF
net provided 24-hour-per-day tracking coverage throughout the mission
except for a few days during the cruise phase. The net remained on the
full-coverage schedule through the period of Venus encounter on December
14.</p>
<h3 id="c36">THE GOLDSTONE COMPLEX</h3>
<p>The tracking antennas clustered in a 7-mile radius near Goldstone Dry
Lake, California, are the central complex of the DSIF net. Three tracking
sites are included in the Goldstone Station: Pioneer Site (DSIF 2), Echo
Site (DSIF 3), and Venus Site. The Venus Site is used for advanced
<span class="pb" id="Page_70">70</span>
radar astronomy, communication research experiments, and radio development;
it took no direct part in the Mariner spacecraft tracking operations,
but was used for the Venus radar experiments.</p>
<p>Pioneer Site has an 85-foot-diameter parabolic reflector antenna and
the necessary radio tracking, receiving, and data recording equipment.
The antenna can be pointed to within better than 0.02 of a degree. The
antenna has one (hour-angle) axis parallel to the polar axis of the Earth,
and the other (declination) axis perpendicular to the polar axis and
parallel to the equatorial plane of the Earth. This “polar-mount” feature
permits tracking on only one axis without moving the other.</p>
<p>The antenna weighs about 240 tons but can be rotated easily at a maximum
rate of 1 degree per second. The minimum tracking rate or antenna
swing (0.250686486 degree per minute) is equal to the rotation rate of
the Earth. Two drive motors working simultaneously but at different
speeds provide an antibacklash safety factor. The antenna can operate
safely in high winds.</p>
<p>The Pioneer antenna has a type of feed system (Cassegrain) that is
essentially similar to that used in many large reflector telescopes. A convex
cone is mounted at the center of the main dish. A received signal is
gathered by the main dish and the cone, reflected to a subreflector on
a quadripod, where the energy is concentrated in a narrow beam and
reflected back to the feed collector point on the main dish. The Cassegrain
feed system lowers the noise picked up by the antenna by reducing interference
from the back of the antenna, and permits more convenient
location of components.</p>
<p>The receiving system at Pioneer Site is also equipped with a low-noise,
extremely sensitive installation combining a parametric amplifier and a
maser. The parametric amplifier is a device that is “pumped” or excited
by microwave energy in such a way that, when an incoming signal is at
its maximum, the effect is such that the “pumped-in” energy augments
the original strength of the incoming signal. At the same time, the parametric
amplifier reduces the receiving system’s own electronic noise to
such a point that the spacecraft can be tracked twice as far as before.</p>
<p>The maser uses a synthetic ruby mixed with chromium and is maintained
at the temperature of liquid helium—about 4.7 degrees K or -450
degrees F (just above absolute zero)—and when “pumped” with a
microwave field, the molecular energy levels of the maser material are
redistributed so as to again improve the signal amplification while lowering
<span class="pb" id="Page_71">71</span>
the system noise. The maser doubles the tracking capability of the
system with a parametric amplifier, and quadruples the capability of the
receiver alone.</p>
<p>The antenna output at Pioneer is a wide-band telemetering channel.
In addition, the antenna can be aimed automatically, using its own
“error signals.” At both the Pioneer and Echo sites at Goldstone, however,
the antenna is pointed by a punched tape prepared by a special-purpose
computer at JPL and transmitted to Goldstone by teletype.</p>
<p>Pioneer Site has a highly sensitive receiver designed to receive a continuous
wave signal in a narrow frequency band in the 960-megacycle
range. The site has equipment for recording tracking data for use by
computers in determining accurate spacecraft position and velocity.</p>
<p>The instrumentation equipment also includes electronic signal
processing devices, magnetic-tape recorders, oscillographs, and other
supplementary receiving equipment. The telemetered data can be decommutated
(recovered from a signal shared by several measurements on a
time basis), encoded, and transmitted by teletype in real time (as received
from the spacecraft) to JPL.</p>
<p>Echo Site is the primary installation in the Goldstone complex and has
antenna and instrumentation facilities identical to those at Pioneer, except
that there is no maser amplifier and a simpler feed system is used
instead of the Cassegrain. However, Echo was used as a transmitting facility
and only as a stand-by receiving station during the Mariner mission.</p>
<p>Echo has a 10-kilowatt, 890-megacycle transmitter which was utilized
for sending commands to the Mariner spacecraft. In addition, the site
has an “atomic clock” frequency standard, based on the atomic vibrations
of rhubidium, which permits high-precision measurements of the
radial velocity of the spacecraft. A unit in the Echo system provides for
“readback” and “confirmation” by the spacecraft of commands transmitted
to it. In a sense, the spacecraft acknowledges receipt of the commands
before executing them.</p>
<p>Walter E. Larkin manages the Goldstone Station for JPL.</p>
<h3 id="c37">THE WOOMERA STATION</h3>
<p>The Woomera, Australia, Station (DSIF 4), managed by William Mettyear
for the Australian Department of Supply, has essentially the same
antenna and tracking capabilities as Goldstone Echo Site, but it has no
provisions for commanding the spacecraft. A small transmitter is used for
tracking purposes only. The station is staffed and operated by the Australian
Department of Supply.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_72">72</div>
<div class="img" id="fig41">
<img src="images/p025.jpg" alt="" width="403" height="799" />
<p class="pcap"><i>The Mobile Tracking Station (DSIF 1) follows the fast-moving spacecraft
during its first low-altitude pass over South Africa.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig42">
<img src="images/p025a.jpg" alt="" width="606" height="600" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Station 5 of the DSIF is located near Johannesburg in South Africa.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig43">
<img src="images/p025b.jpg" alt="" width="616" height="600" />
<p class="pcap"><i>DSIF 4, at Woomera, dominates the landscape in Australia’s “outback.”</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_73">73</div>
<p>Woomera, like Johannesburg, is capable of receiving tracking (position
and velocity) data and telemetered information for real-time transmission
by radio teletype to JPL.</p>
<h3 id="c38">THE JOHANNESBURG STATION</h3>
<p>DSIF 5 is located just outside Johannesburg in the Republic of South
Africa. This station is staffed by the National Institute of Telecommunications
Research (NITR) of the South African Council for Scientific and
Industrial Research and managed by Douglas Hogg.</p>
<p>The antenna and receiving equipment are identical to the Goldstone
Echo Site installation except for minor details. The station has both
transmitting and receiving capability and can send commands to the
spacecraft. Recorded tracking and telemetered data are transmitted in
real time to JPL by radio teletype.</p>
<h3 id="c39">MOBILE TRACKING STATION</h3>
<p>The Mobile Tracking Station (DSIF 1) is a movable installation designed
for emplacement near the point of injection of a space probe to
assist the permanent stations in early acquisition of the spacecraft. This
station is necessary because at this point the spacecraft is relatively low
in altitude and consequently appears to move very fast across the sky.
The Mobile Tracking Station has a fast-tracking antenna for use under
these conditions. DSIF 1 was located near the South African station for
Mariner II. It has a 10-foot parabolic antenna capable of tracking at a
10-degree-per-second rate. A 25-watt, 890-megacycle transmitter is used
for obtaining tracking information. A diplexer permits simultaneous
transmission and reception on the same antenna without interference.</p>
<p>The equipment is installed in mobile vans so that the station can be
operated in remote areas. The antenna is enclosed in a plastic dome and
is mounted on a modified radar pedestal. The radome is inflatable with
air and protects the antenna from wind and weather conditions.</p>
<p>These stations of the DSIF tracked Mariner II in flight and sent commands
to the spacecraft for the execution of maneuvers. The telemetry
data received from the spacecraft during the 129 days of its mission were
recorded and transmitted to JPL, where the information was processed
and reduced by the computers of the space flight operations complex.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_74">74</div>
<h2 id="c40"><span class="smaller">CHAPTER</span> 7
<br />THIRTEEN MILLION WORDS</h2>
<p>The task of receiving, relaying, processing, and interpreting the data
coming in simultaneously on a twenty-four-hour basis for several months
from the several scientific and many engineering sources of the Mariner
spacecraft was of truly monumental proportions.</p>
<p>This activity involved five DSIF tracking stations scattered around the
world, a communication network, two computing stations and auxiliary
facilities, and some 400 personnel over a four-month period.</p>
<p>Although the Mariner scientific information could be stored and subsequently
processed at a later (non-real) time, it was necessary to make
tracking and position data available almost as soon as it was received
(in real time) so that the midcourse maneuver might be computed and
transmitted to the spacecraft, and to further perfect the predicted trajectory
and arrival time at Venus.</p>
<p>The engineering performance of the many spacecraft subsystems was
also of vital concern. Inaccurate operation in any of several areas could
endanger the success of the entire mission. The performance of the attitude
control system, the Earth and Sun sensors, the power system, and
communications were all of critical importance. Corrective action was
possible in certain subsystems where trouble could be predicted from the
data or where limited breakdown had occurred.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_75">75</div>
<p>To integrate all the varied activities necessary to accomplish the mission
objectives, an organization was formed within JPL to coordinate the
DSIF, the communication network, the work of engineering and scientific
advisory panels, and the computer facilities required to evaluate the
data.</p>
<p>This organization was known as the Space Flight Operations Complex.
For operational purposes only, it included the Space Flight Operations
Center, a Communication Center, and a Central Computing Facility
(CCF). The DSIF was responsive to the requirements of the organization,
but was not an integral part of it.</p>
<p>A space flight operations director was responsible for integrating these
many functions into a world-wide Mariner space-flight organization. It
was an exhausting 109-day task, one that would severely tax all the resources
of JPL in terms of know-how, qualified personnel, time, and
equipment before Mariner completed its encounter with Venus.</p>
<h3 id="c41">COMMUNICATION CONTROL</h3>
<p>The Communication Center at JPL in Pasadena was one of the most
active areas during the many days and nights of the Mariner II mission.
All of the teletype and radio lines from the Cape, South Africa, Australia,
and Goldstone terminated in this Center. A high-speed data line
bypassed the Communication Center, linking Goldstone directly with the
Central Computing Facility for quick, real-time computer processing of
vital flight information.</p>
<p>From the Communication Center, the teletype data and voice circuits
were connected to the several areas within JPL where the mission-control
activities were centered, and where the data output was being studied.</p>
<p>The Communication Center was equipped with teletype paper-page
printers and paper-tape hole reperforators, which received and transmitted
data-word and number groups. The teletype lines terminating at
the Center included circuits from Goldstone, South Africa, Australia, and
Cape Canaveral.</p>
<p>There were three lines to Goldstone for full-time, one-way data transmission.
Duplex (simultaneous two-way) transmission was available to
Woomera and South Africa on a full-time basis. In each case, a secondary
circuit was provided to the overseas sites for use during critical periods
and in case the primary radio-teletype circuits had transmission difficulties.
These secondary circuits used different radio transmission paths in
order to reduce the chance of complete loss of contact for any extended
period of time.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_76">76</div>
<div class="img" id="fig44">
<img src="images/p026.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="923" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Radio signals from Mariner are received on 85-ft. antenna.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_77">77</div>
<div class="img" id="fig45">
<img src="images/p026a.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="504" />
<p class="pcap"><i>The highly sensitive receiver (shown under test) is located
in the control room of the station.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig46">
<img src="images/p026b.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="696" />
<p class="pcap"><i>In Goldstone control room, DSIF personnel await confirmation
that spacecraft has begun to scan the planet Venus.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_78">78</div>
<div class="img" id="fig47">
<img src="images/p027.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="607" />
<p class="pcap"><i>From DSIF stations, the data are teletyped in coded format to Pasadena.</i></p>
</div>
<p>
</p>
<div class="img" id="fig48">
<img src="images/p027a.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="287" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Messages are received and routed at the JPL Communications Center.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_79">79</div>
<div class="img" id="fig49">
<img src="images/p027c.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="420" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Data are routed to the digital computer at JPL.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig50">
<img src="images/p027d.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="335" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Printout data are made available to experimenters.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig51">
<img src="images/p027e.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="326" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Spacecraft status is posted in Operations Center.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_80">80</div>
<p>The Mobile Tracking Station in South Africa used the Johannesburg
communication facilities.</p>
<p>Two one-way circuits for testing and control purposes were open to
Cape Canaveral from a month before until after the spacecraft was
launched. Lines from the Communication Center to the Space Flight
Operations Center at JPL terminated in page printers and reperforators in
several locations.</p>
<p>Voice circuits connected all of the stations with Operations Center
through the Communication Center. Long-distance radio telephone calls
were placed to South Africa to establish contact before the launch sequence
was started. Woomera used the Project Mercury voice circuits to
the United States during launch and for three days after.</p>
<h3 id="c42">THE OPERATIONS CENTER</h3>
<p>The actual nerve center of the Mariner operation was the Space Flight
Operations Center (SFOC) at Pasadena. Here, technical and scientific
advisory panels reported to the Project Manager and the Mariner Test
Director on the performance of the spacecraft in flight, analyzed trajectories,
calculated the commands for the midcourse trajectory correction,
and studied the scientific aspects of the mission.</p>
<p>These panels were a Spacecraft Data Analysis Team, a Scientific Data
Group, an Orbit Determination Group, a Tracking Data Analysis Group,
and a Midcourse Command Group.</p>
<p>The Spacecraft Data Analysis Team analyzed the engineering data
transmitted from the spacecraft to evaluate the performance of the subsystems
in flight. The Team was composed of one or more of the engineers
responsible for each of the spacecraft subsystems, and a chairman.</p>
<p>The Science Data Group was composed of the project scientist and
certain other scientists associated with the experiments on board the
spacecraft. This Group evaluated the data from the scientific experiments
while Mariner was in flight and advised the Test Director on the scientific
status of the mission.</p>
<p>The Science Data Group was on continuous duty until 48 hours after
launch, and at other times during the mission. During encounter with
Venus, the Group was also in contact with the scientific experimenters
from other participating organizations who were working with JPL.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_81">81</div>
<div class="img" id="fig52">
<img src="images/p028.jpg" alt="" width="759" height="500" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Closed circuit television monitors are used for instant surveillance of the internal
activities of the Operations Center.</i></p>
</div>
<p>A Tracking Data Analysis Group analyzed the tracking data to be used
in orbit determination. They also assessed the performance of the DSIF
facilities and equipment used to obtain the data.</p>
<p>The Orbit Determination Group used the tracking data to produce
estimates of the actual spacecraft trajectory, and to compute the spacecraft
path with respect to the Earth, Venus, and the Sun. These calculations
were made once each day before the midcourse maneuver, once a
week during the cruise phase, and daily during and immediately after
the planet encounter.</p>
<p>The Operations Center was equipped with lighted boards on which the
progress of the mission was displayed. This information included trajectory
data, spacecraft performance, temperature and pressure readings,
and other data telemetered from the spacecraft subsystems.</p>
<p>Closed-circuit television was used for coordinating the activities of the
SFOC. Operating personnel could use television monitors in four consoles
which were linked to six fixed cameras viewing teletype page printers.
The entire Operations Room could be kept under surveillance by the
Project Manager, the Test Director, or the DSIF Operations Manager,
using cameras controlled in “pan,” “tilt,” and “zoom.”</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_82">82</div>
<h3 id="c43">CENTRAL COMPUTING FACILITY</h3>
<p>During the Mariner II mission, the JPL Central Computing Facility
(CCF) processed approximately 13.1 million data words, or over 90 million
binary bits of computer data. (Binary bit = a discrete unit of information
intelligible to a digital computer. One data word = 7 binary bits.)</p>
<p>In the four-month operation, about 100,000 tracking and telemetering
data cards were received and processed, yielding over 1.2 million computer
pages of tabulated, processed, and analyzed data for evaluation by
the engineers and scientists. Approximately 1,000 miles of magnetic tape
were used in the 1,056 rolls recorded by the DSIF.</p>
<p>The Central Computing Facility processed and reduced tracking and
telemetry data from the spacecraft, as recorded and relayed by the stations
of the DSIF. The tracking information was the basis for orbital calculations
and command decisions. After delivery of telemetry data on
magnetic tapes by the DSIF, the CCF stored the data for later reduction
and analysis. Where telemetry data were being processed in real or near-real
time, certain critical engineering and scientific functions were programmed
to print-out an “alarm” reading when selected measurements
in the data were outside specified limits.</p>
<p>The CCF consists of three stations at JPL: Station C, the primary computing
facility; Station D, the secondary installation; and the Telemetry
Processing Station (TPS).</p>
<p>Station C was the principal installation for processing both tracking
and telemetry data received from the DSIF tracking stations, both
in real and non-real time. The Station was equipped with a high-speed,
general-purpose digital computer with a 32,168-word memory and two
input-output channels, each able to handle 6 tape units. The associated
card-handling equipment was also available.</p>
<p>Tape translators or converters were provided for converting teletype
data and other digital information into magnetic tape format for computer
input. The teletype-to-tape unit operated at a rate of 300 characters
per second.</p>
<p>A smaller computer acted as a satellite of the larger unit, performing
bookkeeping and such related functions as card punching, card reading,
and listing.</p>
<p>A high-speed unit microfilmed magnetic-tape printout was received
from the large computer. It provided “quick-look” copy within 30 minutes
of processing the raw data. Various paper-tape-to-card and card-to-paper-tape
<span class="pb" id="Page_83">83</span>
converters were used to eliminate human error in converting
teletype data tape to computer cards.</p>
<p>Station C also utilized another computer as a real-time monitor and to
prepare a magnetic tape file of all telemetered measurements for input to
the large computer.</p>
<p>Station D was the secondary or backup computational facility, primarily
intended for use in case of equipment failure in Station C. During certain
critical phases of the Mariner mission—launch, orbit determination,
midcourse maneuver—this facility paralleled the operations in Station C.</p>
<p>Station D is equipped with three computers and various card-to-tape
converters and teletype equipment.</p>
<p>The Telemetry Processing Station received and processed all demodulated
data (that recovered from the radio carrier) on magnetic tapes recorded
at the DSIF stations. The TPS output was digital magnetic tapes
suitable for computer entry.</p>
<p>The TPS equipment included FM discriminators, a code translator,
a device for converting data from analog to digital form, and magnetic-tape
recorders. Basically, the equipment accepted the digital outputs from
the tape units, the analog-to-digital converter, and the code translator and
put them in digital tape format for the computer input.</p>
<p>As the launch operation started on August 27, the powered-flight portion
of the space trajectories program was run at launch minus 5 minutes
(L minus 5) and was repeated several times because of holds at AMR.
The orbit determination program was run at lift-off to calculate the first
orbit predictions used for aiding the DSIF in finding the spacecraft in
flight.</p>
<p>During the 12 hours following launch, both C and D Stations performed
parallel computations on tracking data. Station D discontinued
space flight operations at L plus 12 hours and resumed at the beginning
of the midcourse maneuver phase.</p>
<p>Tracking data processing and midcourse maneuver studies were conducted
daily until the midcourse maneuver was performed at L plus
eight days. For the following 97 days, tracking data were processed once
each week for orbit determination. Starting three days before the encounter,
tracking data were processed daily until the beginning of the
encounter phase.</p>
<p>Tracking data processing was conducted in near-real time throughout
encounter day, and daily for two days thereafter. For these three days,
<span class="pb" id="Page_84">84</span>
tracking data were handled in Station D in order to permit exclusive
use of Station C for telemetry data processing and analysis. After this
three-day period, including the encounter, Station C processed the tracking
data every sixth day until the mission terminated on L plus 129 days.</p>
<p>Telemetry data were processed in a different manner. Following the
launch, DSIF Station 5 at South Africa received the telemetry signal first,
demodulated it, and put it in the proper format for teletype transmission
to JPL. The other DSIF stations followed in sequence as the spacecraft
was heard in other parts of the world. For two days after launch, the
computers processed telemetry data as required by the Spacecraft Data
Analysis Team.</p>
<p>During those periods when the large computer was processing tracking
data, a secondary unit supplied quick-look data in near-real time.
When Goldstone was listening to the spacecraft, quick-look data were
processed in real time, using the high-speed data line direct to the Central
Computing Facility.</p>
<p>For the 106 days that Mariner was actually in Mode II (cruise), the
telemetry data were processed twenty-four hours a day, seven days a
week. Data were presented to the engineering and science analysis teams
in quick-look format every three hours, except for short maintenance interruptions,
one computer failure, and a major modification requiring three
days, when a back-up data process mode of operation was used. The
large computer performed full processing and analysis of engineering and
science data seven days a week from launch until the Venus encounter.</p>
<p>On encounter day, the secondary Station C computer processed telemetry
data from the high-speed Goldstone line. Data on magnetic tapes
produced by the computer were processed and analyzed by the large
unit in near-real time every 30 minutes. The computer processing and
delivery time during this operation varied from 4½ to 7 minutes.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_85">85</div>
<h2 id="c44"><span class="smaller">CHAPTER</span> 8
<br />THE SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS</h2>
<p>After a year of concentrated effort, in which the resources of NASA,
the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and American science and industry had
been marshalled, Mariner II had probed secrets of the solar system some
billions of years old.</p>
<p>Scientists and engineers had studied the miles of data processed in
California from the tapes recorded at the five DSIF tracking stations
around the world. Two and a half months of careful analysis and evaluation
yielded a revised estimate of Venus and of the phenomena of space.
As a result, the dynamics of the solar system were revealed in better
perspective and the shrouded planet stood partially unmasked. When
the Mariner data were correlated with the data gathered by JPL radar
experiments at Goldstone in 1961 and 1962, the relationships between
the Earth, Venus, and the Sun became far clearer than ever before.</p>
<p>Two experiments were carried on the spacecraft for a close-up investigation
of Venus’ atmosphere and temperature characteristics—a microwave
radiometer and an infrared radiometer. They were designed to
operate during the approximate 35-minute encounter period and at a
distance varying from about 10,200 miles to 49,200 miles from the center
of the planet.<a class="fn" id="fr_2" href="#fn_2">[2]</a></p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_86">86</div>
<div class="img" id="fig53">
<img src="images/p029.jpg" alt="" width="539" height="500" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Cosmic dust detector.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig54">
<img src="images/p029a.jpg" alt="" width="637" height="500" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Solar plasma spectrometer.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dt>COLLECTOR CUP</dt>
<dt>PROGRAMMER</dt>
<dt>ELECTROMETER</dt>
<dt>DEFLECTION PLATES</dt></dl>
<div class="img" id="fig55">
<img src="images/p029d.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="485" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Magnetometer.</i></p>
</div>
<div class="img" id="fig56">
<img src="images/p029e.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="609" />
<p class="pcap"><i>High-energy particle detector.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dt>COLLECTOR</dt>
<dt>SHIELD CAN</dt>
<dt>QUARTZ FIBER</dt></dl>
<div class="img" id="fig57">
<img src="images/p029f.jpg" alt="" width="595" height="799" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Microwave and infrared radiometers.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dt>REFERENCE HORNS</dt>
<dt>MICROWAVE RADIOMETER</dt>
<dt>INFRARED RADIOMETER</dt></dl>
<div class="pb" id="Page_87">87</div>
<h4 id="table2"><i>Table 2. Mariner Experiments</i></h4>
<table class="center" summary="">
<tr class="th"><th><i>Experiment</i> </th><th><i>Description</i> </th><th><i>Experimenters</i></th></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Microwave radiometer </td><td class="l">Determine the temperature of the planet surface and details concerning its atmosphere </td><td class="l">Dr. A. H. Barrett, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; D. E. Jones, JPL; Dr. J. Copeland, Army Ordnance Missile Command and Ewen-Knight Corp.; Dr. A. E. Lilley, Harvard College Observatory</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Infrared radiometer </td><td class="l">Determine the structure of the cloud layer and temperature distributions at cloud altitudes </td><td class="l">Dr. L. D. Kaplan, JPL and University of Nevada; Dr. G. Neugebauer, JPL; Dr. C. Sagan, University of California, Berkeley, and Harvard College Observatory</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Magnetometer </td><td class="l">Measure planetary and interplanetary magnetic fields </td><td class="l">P. J. Coleman, NASA; Dr. L. Davis, Caltech; Dr. E. J. Smith, JPL; Dr. C. P. Sonett, NASA</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Ion chamber and matched Geiger-Mueller tubes </td><td class="l">Measure high-energy cosmic radiation </td><td class="l">Dr. H. R. Anderson, JPL; Dr. H. V. Neher, Caltech</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Anton special-purpose tube </td><td class="l">Measure lower radiation (especially near Venus) </td><td class="l">Dr. J. Van Allen and L. Frank, State University of Iowa</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Cosmic dust detector </td><td class="l">Measure the flux of cosmic dust </td><td class="l">W. M. Alexander, Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Solar plasma spectrometer </td><td class="l">Measure the intensity of low-energy positively charged particles from the Sun </td><td class="l">M. Neugebauer and Dr. C. W. Snyder, JPL</td></tr>
</table>
<div class="pb" id="Page_88">88</div>
<p>Four experiments for investigation of interplanetary space and the
regions near Venus employed: a magnetometer; high-energy charged particle
detectors, including an ionization chamber and Geiger-Mueller
radiation counters; a cosmic dust detector; and a solar plasma detector.</p>
<p>These six scientific experiments represented the cooperative efforts of
scientists at nine institutions: The Army Ordnance Missile Command,
the Ewen-Knight Corp., the California Institute of Technology, the Goddard
Space Flight Center of NASA, Harvard College Observatory, the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the
State Universities of Iowa and Nevada, and the University of California
at Berkeley. <a href="#table2">Table 2</a> lists the experiments, the experimenters, and their
affiliations.</p>
<p>At the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the integration of the scientific experiments
and the generation of a number of them were carried out under
the direction of Dr. Manfred Eimer. R. C. Wyckoff was the project
scientist and J. S. Martin was responsible for the engineering of the
scientific experiments.</p>
<h3 id="c45">DATA CONDITIONING SYSTEM</h3>
<p>Mariner’s scientific experiments were controlled and their outputs processed
by a data conditioning system which gathered the information
from the instruments and prepared it for transmission to the Earth by
telemetry. In this function, the data system acted as a buffer between
the science systems and the spacecraft data encoder.</p>
<p>The pulse output of certain of the science instruments was counted
and the voltage amplitude representations of other instruments were
converted from analog form to a binary digital equivalent of the information
signals. The data conditioning system also included circuits to permit
time-sharing of the telemetry channels with the spacecraft engineering
data, generation of periodic calibration signals for the radiometer and
magnetometer, and control of the direction and speed of the radiometer
scanning cycle.</p>
<p>During Mariner’s cruise mode, the data conditioning system was used
for processing both engineering and science data. If the spacecraft lost
lock on the Sun or the Earth during the cruise mode, no scientific data
would be telemetered during the reorientation period. Engineering data
were sampled and transmitted for about 17 seconds during every 37-second
interval. The planetary encounter mode involved only science and
<span class="pb" id="Page_89">89</span>
no engineering data transmission. In this mode, the science data were
sampled during 20-second intervals.</p>
<h3 id="c46">COSMIC DUST DETECTOR</h3>
<p>The cosmic dust detector on Mariner II was designed to measure the
flux density, direction, and momentum of interplanetary dust particles
between the Earth and Venus. These measurements were concerned
with the particles’ direction and distance from the Sun, the momentum
with respect to the spacecraft, the nature of any concentrations of the
dust in streams, variations in cosmic dust flux with distance from the
Earth and Venus, and the possible effects on manned flight.</p>
<p>Mariner’s cosmic dust instrument could detect a particle as small as
something like a billionth of a gram, or about five-trillionths of a pound.
This type of sensor had been used on rockets even before Explorer I.
It had yielded good results on Pioneer I in the region between the Earth
and the Moon. The instrument was a 55-square-inch acoustical detector
plate, or sounding board, made of magnesium. A crystal microphone was
attached to the center of the plate. The instrument could detect both
low- and high-momentum particles and also provide a rough idea of their
direction of travel.</p>
<p>The dust particle counters were read once each 37 seconds during the
cruise mode. This rate was increased to once each 20 seconds during the
encounter with Venus.</p>
<p>The instrument was attached to the top of the basic hexagonal structure;
it weighed 1.85 pounds, and consumed only 0.8 watt of power.</p>
<h3 id="c47">SOLAR PLASMA EXPERIMENT</h3>
<p>In order to investigate the phenomena associated with the movement
of plasma (charged particles of low energy and density streaming out
from the Sun to form the so-called “solar wind”) in interplanetary space,
Mariner carried a solar plasma spectrometer that measured the flux and
energy spectrum of positively charged plasma components with energies
in the range 240 to 8400 volts. The extremely sensitive plasma detector
unit was open to space, consumed 1 watt of power, and consisted of four
basic elements: curved electrostatic deflection plates and collector cup,
electrometer, a sweep amplifier, and a programmer.</p>
<p>The curved deflector plates formed a tunnel that projected from the
chassis on the spacecraft hexagon in which the instrument was housed.
<span class="pb" id="Page_90">90</span>
Pointed toward the Sun, the gold-plated magnesium deflector plates
gathered particles from space. Since the walls of the tunnel each carried
different electrical charges, only particles with just the correct energy
and speed could pass through and be detected by the collector cup without
striking the charged walls. A sensitive electrometer circuit then measured
the current generated by the flow of the charged particles reaching
the cup.</p>
<p>The deflection plates were supplied by amplifier-generated voltages
which were varied in 10 steps, each lasting about 18 seconds, allowing
the instrument to measure protons with energies in the 240 to 8,400
electron volt range. The programmer switched in the proper voltage and
resistances.</p>
<h3 id="c48">HIGH-ENERGY RADIATION EXPERIMENT</h3>
<p>Mariner carried an experiment to measure high-energy radiation in
space and near Venus. The charged particles measured by Mariner were
primarily cosmic rays (protons or the nuclei of hydrogen atoms), alpha
particles (nuclei of helium atoms), the nuclei of other heavier atoms,
and electrons. The study of these particles in space and those which
might be trapped near Venus was undertaken in the hope of a better
understanding of the dynamics of the solar system and the potential
hazards to manned flight.</p>
<p>The high-energy radiation experiment consisted of an ionization chamber
and detectors measuring particle flux (velocity times density), all
mounted in a box measuring 6 × 6 × 2 inches and weighing just under
3 pounds. The box was attached halfway up the spacecraft superstructure
in order to isolate the instruments as much as possible from secondary
emission particles produced when the spacecraft was struck by
cosmic rays, and to prevent the spacecraft from blocking high-energy
radiation from space.</p>
<p>The ionization chamber had a stainless steel shell 5 inches in diameter,
with walls only 1/100-inch thick. The chamber was filled with argon gas
into which was projected a quartz fibre next to a quartz rod.</p>
<p>A charged particle entering the chamber would leave a wake of ions
in the argon gas. Negative ions accumulated on the rod, reducing the
potential between the rod and the spherical shell, eventually causing the
quartz fibre to touch the rod. This action discharged the rod, producing
<span class="pb" id="Page_91">91</span>
an electrical pulse which was amplified and transmitted to the Earth.
The rod was then recharged and the fibre returned to its original position.</p>
<p>In order to penetrate the walls of the chamber, protons required an
energy of 10 million electron volts (Mev), electrons needed 0.5 Mev,
and alpha particles 40 Mev.</p>
<p>The particle flux detector incorporated three Geiger-Mueller tubes,
two of which formed a companion experiment to the ionization chamber;
each generated a current pulse whenever a charged particle was detected.
One tube was shielded by an 8/1,000-inch-thick stainless steel sleeve,
the other by a 24/1,000-inch-thick electron-stopping beryllium shield.
Thus, the proportion of particles could be determined.</p>
<p>The third Geiger-Mueller tube was an end-window Anton-type sensor
with a mica window that admitted protons with energies greater than
0.5 Mev and electrons, 40,000 electron volts. A magnesium shield around
the rest of the tube enabled the instrument to determine the direction
of particles penetrating only the window.</p>
<p>The three Geiger-Mueller tubes protruded from the box on the superstructure
of the spacecraft. The end-window tube was inclined 20 degrees
from the others and 70 degrees from the spacecraft-Sun line since
it had to be shielded from direct solar exposure.</p>
<h3 id="c49">THE MAGNETOMETER</h3>
<p>Mariner carried a magnetometer to measure the magnetic field in
interplanetary space and in the vicinity of Venus. Lower sensitivity limit
of the instrument was about 5 gamma. A gamma is a unit of magnetic
measurement and is equal to 10⁻⁵ or 1/100,000 oersted, or 1/30,000 of
the Earth’s magnetic field at the equator. The nails in one of your shoes
would probably produce a field of about 1 gamma at a distance of approximately
4 feet.</p>
<p>Housed in a 6- × 3-inch metal cylinder, the instrument consisted of
three magnetic core sensors, each aligned on a different axis to read the
three magnetic field components and having primary and secondary
windings. The presence of a magnetic field altered the current in the
secondary winding in proportion to the strength of the field encountered.</p>
<p>The magnetometer was attached near the top of the superstructure,
just below the omni-antenna, in order to remove it as far as possible from
any spacecraft components having magnetic fields of their own.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_92">92</div>
<p>An auxiliary coil was wound around each of the instrument’s magnetic
sensor cores to compensate for permanent magnetic fields existing in the
spacecraft itself. These spacecraft fields were measured at the magnetometer
before launch and, in flight, the auxiliary coils carried currents
of sufficient strength to cancel out the spacecraft’s magnetic fields.</p>
<p>The magnetometer reported almost continuously on its journey and for
20 days after encounter. During the encounter, observations were made
each 20 seconds on each of the three components of the magnetic field.</p>
<h3 id="c50">MICROWAVE RADIOMETER</h3>
<p>A microwave radiometer on board Mariner II was designed to scan
Venus during encounter at two wavelengths: 13.5 and 19 millimeters.
The radiometer was intended to help settle some of the controversies
about the origin of the apparently high surface temperature emanating
from Venus, and the value of the surface temperature.</p>
<p>The equipment included a 19-inch-diameter parabolic antenna mounted
above the basic hexagonal structure on a swivel driven in a 120-degree
scanning motion by a motor. The radiometer electronics circuits were
housed behind the antenna dish. The antenna was equipped with a
diplexer, which allowed it to receive both wavelengths at once without
interference, and to compare the signals emanating from the two reference
horns with those from the planet. The reference horns were pointed
away from the main antenna beam so they would look into deep space as
Mariner passed Venus. This feature allowed the antenna to “bring in” a
reference temperature of approximately absolute zero during encounter.</p>
<p>The microwave radiometer was to be turned on 10 hours before the
encounter began. An electric motor was then to start a scanning or “nodding”
motion of 120 degrees at the rate of 1 degree per second. Upon
radiometer contact with the planet, this scanning rate would be reduced
to 1/10 degree per second as long as the planetary disk was scanned.
A special command system in the data conditioning system would
reverse or normalize the direction of scan as the radiometer reached the
edge or limb of the planet.</p>
<p>The signals from the antenna and the reference horns were to be processed
and the data handled in a receiver, located behind the antenna,
which measured the difference between the signals from Venus and the
reference signals from space. The information was then to be telemetered
to the Earth.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_93">93</div>
<p>The microwave radiometer was automatically calibrated twenty-three
times during the mission by a sequence originating in the data conditioning
system, so that the correct functioning of the instrument could
be determined before the encounter with Venus.</p>
<h3 id="c51">INFRARED RADIOMETER</h3>
<p>The infrared radiometer was a companion experiment to the microwave
instrument and was rigidly mounted to the microwave antenna so
that both radiometers would look at the same area of Venus with the
same scanning rate. The instrument detected radiation in the 8 to 9 and
10 to 10.8 micron regions of the infrared spectrum.</p>
<p>The infrared radiometer had two optical sensors. As the energy entered
the system, it was “chopped” by a rotating disk, alternately passing or
comparing emissions from Venus and from empty space. The beam was
then split by a filter into the two wavelength regions. The output was
then detected, processed, and transmitted to the Earth.</p>
<p>The infrared radiometer measured 6 inches by 2 inches, weighed 2.7
pounds, and consumed 2 watts of power. The instrument was equipped
with a calibration plate which was mounted on a superstructure truss
adjacent to the radiometer.</p>
<h3 id="c52">MARINER’S SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES</h3>
<p>Equipped with these instruments and with the mechanism for getting
the measurements back to Earth, Mariner II was prepared to look for
the answers to some of the questions inherent in its over-all mission
objectives:</p>
<dl class="undent"><dt>1. The investigation of interplanetary space between the Earth and Venus, measuring such phenomena as the cosmic dust, the mysterious plasma or solar winds, high-energy cosmic rays from space outside our solar system, charged particles from the Sun, and the magnetic fields of space.</dt>
<dt>2. The experiments to be performed near Venus (at about 21,150 miles out from the surface) in an effort to understand its magnetic fields, radiation belts, the temperature and composition of its clouds, and the temperature and conditions on the surface of the planet.</dt></dl>
<div class="pb" id="Page_94">94</div>
<h2 id="c53"><span class="smaller">CHAPTER</span> 9
<br />THE LEGACY OF MARINER</h2>
<p>If intelligent life had existed on Venus on the afternoon of the Earth’s
December 14, 1962, and if it could have seen through the clouds, it
might have observed Mariner II approach from the night side, drift down
closer, cross over to the daylight face, and move away toward the Sun
to the right. The time was the equivalent of 12:34 p.m. along the Pacific
Coast of the United States, where the spacecraft was being tracked.</p>
<p>Mariner II had reached the climax of its 180-million-mile, 109-day
trip through space. The 35-minute encounter with Venus would tell
Earth scientists more about our sister planet than they had been able to
learn during all the preceding centuries.</p>
<h3 id="c54">SPACE WITHOUT DUST?</h3>
<p>Before Mariner, scientists theorized about the existence of clouds of
cosmic dust around the Sun. A knowledge of the composition, origin,
and the dynamics of these minute particles is necessary for study of the
origins and evolution of the solar system.</p>
<p>Tiny particles of cosmic dust (some with masses as low as 1.3 × 10⁻¹⁰
gram or about one-trillionth of a pound) were thought to be present in
the solar system and have been recorded by satellites in the near-Earth
regions.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_95">95</div>
<p>These microcosmic particles could be either the residue left over after
our solar system was formed some 5 billion years ago, possibly by condensation
of huge masses of gas and dust clouds; or, the debris deposited
within our system by the far-flung and decaying tails of passing comets;
or, the dust trapped from galactic space by the magnetic fields of the
Sun and the planets.</p>
<p>Analysis of the more than 1,700 hours of cosmic dust detector data
recovered from the flight of Mariner II seems to indicate that in the
region between the Earth and Venus the concentration of tiny cosmic
dust particles is some ten-thousand times less than that observed near
the Earth.</p>
<p>During the 129 days (including the post-encounter period) of Mariner’s
mission, the data showed only one dust particle impact which
occurred in deep space and not near Venus. Equivalent experiments
near Earth (on board Earth satellites) have yielded over 3,700 such
impacts within periods of approximately 500 hours. The cause of this
heavy near-Earth concentration, the exact types of particles, and their
source are still unknown.</p>
<p>The cosmic dust experiment performed well during the Mariner mission.
Although some calibration difficulty was observed about two weeks
before the Venus encounter, possibly caused by overheating of the sensor
crystal, there was no apparent effect in the electronic circuits.</p>
<h3 id="c55">THE UBIQUITOUS SOLAR WIND</h3>
<p>For some time prior to Mariner, scientists postulated the existence of
a so-called plasma flow or “solar wind” streaming out from the Sun, to
explain the motion of comet tails (which always point away from the
Sun, perhaps repelled by the plasma), geomagnetic storms, aurorae, and
other such disturbances. (Plasma is defined as a gas in which the atoms
are dissociated into atomic nuclei and electrons, but which, as a whole,
is electrically neutral.)</p>
<p>The solar wind was thought to drastically alter the configuration of
the Sun’s external magnetic field. Plasma moving at extreme velocities
is able to carry with it the lines of magnetic force originating in the
Sun’s corona and to distort any fields it encounters as it moves out from
the Sun.</p>
<p>It was believed that these moving plasma currents are also capable
of altering the size of a planet’s field of magnetic flux. When this happens,
<span class="pb" id="Page_96">96</span>
the field on the sunlit face of the planet is compressed and the
dark side has an elongated expansion of the field. For example, the outer
boundary of the Earth’s magnetic field is pushed in by the solar wind
to about 40,000 miles from the Earth on the sunward side. On the dark
side, the field extends out much farther.</p>
<p>The solar wind was also known to have an apparent effect on the
movement of cosmic rays. As the Sun spots increase in the regular 11-year
cycle, the number of cosmic rays reaching the Earth from outside
our solar system will decrease.</p>
<p>Mariner II found that streams of plasma are constantly flowing out
from the Sun. This fluctuating, extremely tenuous solar wind seems to
dominate interplanetary space in our region of the solar system. The
wind moves at velocities varying from about 200 to 500 miles per second
(about 720,000 to 1,800,000 miles per hour), and measures up to perhaps
a million degrees Fahrenheit (within the subatomic structure).</p>
<p>With the solar plasma spectrometer working at ten different energy
levels, Mariner required 3.7 minutes to run through a complete energy
spectrum. During the 123 days, when readings were made, a total of
40,000 such spectra were recorded. Plasma was monitored on 104 of
those 123 days, and on every one of the spectra, the plasma was always
present.</p>
<p>Mariner showed that the energies of the particles in the solar winds
are very low, on the order of a few hundred or few thousand electron
volts, as compared with the billions and trillions of electron volts measured
in cosmic radiation.</p>
<p>The extreme tenuousity or low density of the solar wind is difficult
to comprehend: about 10 to 20 protons (hydrogen nuclei) and electrons
per cubic inch. But despite the low energy and density, solar wind
particles in our region of the solar system are billions of times more
numerous than cosmic rays and, therefore, the total energy content of the
winds is much greater than that of the cosmic rays.</p>
<p>Mariner found that when the surface of the Sun was relatively inactive,
the velocity of the wind was a little less than 250 miles per second and
the temperature a few hundred thousand degrees. The plasma was
always present, but the density and the velocity varied. Flare activity
on the Sun seemed to eject clouds of plasma, greatly increasing the
velocity and density of the winds. Where the particles were protons, their
energies ranged from 750 to 2,500 electron volts.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_97">97</div>
<p>The experiment also showed that the velocity of the plasma apparently
undergoes frequent fluctuations of this type. On approximately twenty
occasions, the velocity increased within a day or two by 20 to 100%.
These disturbances seemed to correlate well with magnetic storms observed
on the Earth. In several cases, the sudden increase in the solar
plasma flux preceded various geomagnetic effects observed on the Earth
by only a short time.</p>
<p>The Mariner solar plasma experiment was the first extensive measurement
of the intensity and velocity spectrum of solar plasma taken far
enough from the Earth’s field so that the Earth would have no effect on
the results.</p>
<h3 id="c56">HIGH-ENERGY PARTICLES: FATAL DOSAGE?</h3>
<p>Speculation has long existed as to the amount of high-energy radiation
(from cosmic rays and particles from the Sun with energies in the millions
of electron volts) present within our solar system and as to whether
exposure would be fatal to a human space traveler.</p>
<p>This high-energy type of ionizing radiation is thought to consist of
the nuclei of such atoms as hydrogen and helium, and of electrons, all
moving very rapidly. The individual particles are energetic enough to
penetrate considerable amounts of matter. The concentration of these
particles is apparently much lower than that of low-energy plasma.</p>
<p>The experiments were designed to detect three types of high-energy
radiation particles: the cosmic rays coming from outside the solar system,
solar flare particles, and radiation trapped around Venus (as that which
is found in the Earth’s Van Allen Belt).</p>
<p>These high-energy radiation particles (also thought to affect aurorae
and radio blackouts on the Earth) measure from about one hundred
thousand electron volts up to billions of volts. The distribution of this
energy is thought to be uniform outside the solar system and is assumed
to move in all directions in a pattern remaining essentially constant over
thousands of years.</p>
<p>Inside the solar system, the amount of such radiation reaching the
Earth is apparently controlled by the magnetic fields found in interplanetary
space and near the Earth.</p>
<p>The number of cosmic rays changes by a large amount over the course
of an 11-year Sun-spot cycle, and below a certain energy level (5,000
<span class="pb" id="Page_98">98</span>
Mev) few cosmic rays are present in the solar system. They are probably
deflected by plasma currents or magnetic fields.</p>
<p>Mariner’s charged particles experiment indicated that cosmic radiation
(bombardment by cosmic rays), both from galactic space and those
particles originating in the Sun, would not have been fatal to an astronaut,
at least during the four-month period of Mariner’s mission.</p>
<p>The accumulated radiation inside the counters was only 3 roentgens,
and during the one solar storm recorded on October 23 and 24, the
dosage measured only about ¼ roentgen. In other words, the dosage
amounts to about one-thousandth of the usually accepted “half-lethal”
dosage, or that level at which half of the persons exposed would die. An
astronaut might accept many times the dosage detected by Mariner II
without serious effects.</p>
<p>The experiment also showed little variation in density of charged
particles during the trip, even with a 30% decrease in distance from the
Sun, and no apparent increase due to magnetically trapped particles or
radiation belts near Venus as compared with interplanetary space. However,
these measurements were made during a period when the Sun was
slowly decreasing in activity at the end of an 11-year cycle. The Sun
spots will be at a minimum in 1964-1965, when galactic cosmic rays
will sharply increase. Further experiments are needed to sample the
charged particles in space under all conditions.</p>
<p>The lack of change measured by the ionization chamber during the
mission was significant; the cosmic-ray flux of approximately 3 particles
per square centimeter per second throughout the flight was an unusually
constant value. A clear increase in high-energy particles (10 Mev to about
800 Mev) emitted by the Sun was noted only once: a flare-up between
7:42 and 8:45 a.m., PST, October 23. The ionization chamber reading
began to increase before the flare disappeared. From a background reading
of 670 ion pairs per cubic centimeter per second per standard atmosphere,
it went to a peak value of 18,000, varied a bit, and remained above
10,000 for 6 hours before gradually decreasing over a period of several
days. Meanwhile, the flux of the particles detected by the Geiger counter
rose from the background count of 3 to a peak of 16 per square centimeter
per second. Ionization thus increased much more than the number
of particles, indicating to the scientists that the high-energy particles
coming from the Sun might have had much lower average energies than
the galactic cosmic rays.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_99">99</div>
<div class="img" id="fig58">
<img src="images/p030.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="460" />
<p class="pcap"><i>Data obtained by microwave radiometer are illustrated at left; results of infrared
radiometer experiment are shown at right. Note how moving spacecraft sees
more of atmosphere along limb or edge of planet, less in center.</i></p>
</div>
<p>In contrast, the low-energy experiment detected the October 23 event,
and eight or ten others not seen by the high-energy detectors. These must
have been low-penetrating particles excluded by the thicker walls of the
high-energy instrument. These particles were perhaps protons between
0.5 and 10 Mev or electrons between 0.04 and 0.5 Mev.</p>
<p>At 20,000 miles from the Earth, the rate at which high-energy particles
have been observed has been recorded at several thousand per second.
With Mariner at approximately the same distance from Venus, the average
was only one particle per second, as it had been during most of the
month of November in space. Such a rate would indicate a low planetary
magnetic field, or one that did not extend out as far as Mariner’s 21,598-mile
closest approach to the surface.</p>
<p>Mariner II measured and transmitted data in unprecedented quantity
and quality during the long trip. In summary, Mariner showed that, during
the measuring period, particles were numerous in the energy ranges
from a few hundred to 1,000 electron volts. Protons in the range 0.5 to
10 Mev were not numerous, but at times the flux (density) was several
times that of cosmic rays.</p>
<p>Almost no protons were shown in the 10 to 800 Mev range, except during
solar flares when the particles in this range were numerous. Above
<span class="pb" id="Page_100">100</span>
800 Mev (primarily those cosmic rays entering interplanetary space from
outside the solar system) the number decreased rapidly as the energy
increased, the average total being about 3 per centimeter per second.</p>
<p>During one 30-day period in November and December, the low-energy
counter saw only two small increases in radiation intensity. At this time,
the mean velocity of the solar wind was considerably lower than during
September and October. This might suggest that high-velocity plasma and
low-energy cosmic rays might both originate from the same solar source.</p>
<h3 id="c57">A MAGNETIC FIELD?</h3>
<p>Prior to the Mariner II mission, no conclusive evidence had ever been
presented concerning a Venusian magnetic field and nothing was known
about possible fluid motions in a molten core or other hypotheses concerning
the interior of the planet.</p>
<p>Scientists assumed that Venus had a field somewhat similar to the
Earth’s, although possibly reduced in magnitude because of the apparently
slow rate of rotation and the pressure of solar plasma. Many questions
had also been raised concerning the nature of the atmosphere,
charged particles in the vicinity of the planet, magnetic storms, and
aurorae. Good magnetometer data from Mariner II would help solve some
of these problems.</p>
<p>Mariner’s magnetometer experiment also sought verification of
the existence and nature of a steady magnetic field in interplanetary
space. This would be important in understanding the charged particle
balance of the inner solar system. Other objectives of the experiment
were to establish both the direction and the magnitude of long-period
fluctuations in the interplanetary magnetic field and to study solar disturbances
and such problems in magnetohydrodynamics (the study of the
motion of charged particles and their surrounding magnetic fields) as the
existence and effect of magnetized and charged plasmas in space.</p>
<p>The strength of a planet’s field is thought to be closely related to its
rate of rotation—the slower the rotation, the weaker the field. As a consequence,
if Venus’ field is simple in structure like the Earth’s, the surface
field should be 5 to 10% that of the Earth. If the structure of the field
is complex, the surface field in places might exceed the Earth’s without
increasing the field along Mariner’s trajectory to observable values.</p>
<p>Most of the phenomena associated with the Earth’s magnetic field are
likely to be significantly modified or completely absent in and around
<span class="pb" id="Page_101">101</span>
Venus. Auroral displays and the trapping of charged particles in radiation
belts such as our Van Allen would be missing. The field of the Earth
keeps low- and moderate-energy cosmic rays away from the top of the
atmosphere, except in the polar regions. The cosmic ray flux at the top
of Venus’ atmosphere is likely to correspond everywhere to the high level
found at the Earth’s poles.</p>
<div class="img" id="fig59">
<img src="images/p031.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="597" />
<p class="pcap"><i>As it encountered
Venus, Mariner II
made three scans of the
planet.</i></p>
</div>
<dl class="pcap"><dt>SUN</dt>
<dt>DIRECTION OF SCAN</dt>
<dt>DATA READINGS (18 TOTAL)</dt></dl>
<p>In contrast to Venus, Jupiter, which is ten times larger in mass and
volume and rotates twice as fast as the Earth, has a field considerably
stronger than the Earth’s. The Moon has a field on the sunlit side
(according to Russian measurements) which, because of the Moon’s slow
rotation rate, is less than ⅓ of 1% of the Earth’s at the Equator. Thus,
a planet’s rotation, if at a less rapid rate than the Earth’s, seems to produce
smaller magnetic fields. This theory is consistent with the idea of
a planetary magnetic field resulting from the dynamo action inside the
molten core of a rotating planet.</p>
<p>The Sun, on the whole, has a fairly regular dipole field. Superimposed
on this are some very large fields associated with disturbed regions such
as spots or flares, which produce fields of very great intensities.</p>
<p>These solar fields are drawn out into space by plasma flow. Although
relatively small in magnitude, these fields are an important influence on
<span class="pb" id="Page_102">102</span>
the propagation of particles. And the areas in question are very large—something
on the order of an astronomical unit.</p>
<p>Mariner II seemed to show that, in space, a generally quiet magnetic-field
condition was found to exist, measuring something less than 10
gamma and fluctuating over periods of 1 second to 1 minute.</p>
<p>As Mariner made its closest approach to Venus, the magnetometer saw
no significant change, a condition also noted by the radiation and solar
plasma detectors. The magnetic field data looked essentially as they had
in interplanetary space, without either fluctuations or smooth changes.</p>
<p>The encounter produced no slow changes, nor was there a continuous
fluctuation as in the interplanetary regions. There was no indication of
trapped particles or near-Venus modification in the flow of solar plasma.</p>
<p>On the Earth’s sunny side, a definite magnetic field exists out to 40,000
miles, and on the side away from the Sun considerably farther. If Venus’
field had been similar to the Earth’s, a reading of 100 to 200 gamma, a
large cosmic-ray count, and an absence of solar plasma should have
been shown, but none of these phenomena were noted by Mariner.</p>
<p>These results do not prove that Venus definitely has no magnetic field,
but only that it was not measurable at Mariner’s 21,598-mile point of
closest approach. The slow rotation rate and the pressure of the solar
winds probably combine to limit the field to a value one tenth of the
Earth’s. Since Mariner passed Venus on the sunlit side, readings are
required on the dark side in order to confirm the condition of the magnetic
field on that side of the planet, which normally should be considerably
extended.</p>
<h3 id="c58">THE SURFACE: HOW HOT?</h3>
<p>Before Mariner, scientists had offered two main theories about the
surface of Venus: It had either an electrically charged ionosphere causing
false high-temperature readings on Earth instruments despite a cool surface,
or a hot surface with clouds becoming increasingly colder with
altitude.</p>
<p>The cool-surface theory supposed an ionosphere with a layer of electrons
having a density thousands of times that of the Earth’s upper atmosphere.
Microwave radiations from this electrical layer would cause
misleading readings on Earth instruments. As a space probe scanned
across such an atmosphere, it would see the least amount of charged
<span class="pb" id="Page_103">103</span>
ionosphere when looking straight down, and the most concentrated
amount while scanning the limb or edge. In the latter case, it would be
at an angle and would show essentially a thickening effect of the atmosphere
because of the curvature of the planet.</p>
<p>As the probe approached the edge, the phenomenon known as “limb
brightening” would occur, since the instruments would see more of the
electron-charged ionosphere and little if any of the cooler surface. The
temperature readings would, therefore, be correspondingly higher at the
limbs.</p>
<p>The other theory, held by most scientists, visualized a hot surface on
Venus, with no heavy concentration of electrons in the atmosphere, but
with cooler clouds at higher altitudes. Thus, the spacecraft would look at
a very hot planet from space, covered by colder, thick clouds. Straight
down, the microwave radiometer would see the hot surface through the
clouds. When approaching the limb, the radiations would encounter a
thicker concentration of atmosphere and might not see any of the hot
surface. This condition, “limb darkening,” would be characterized by
temperatures decreasing as the edges of the planet were approached.</p>
<p>An instrument capability or resolution much higher than that available
from the Earth was required to resolve the limb-brightening or limb-darkening
controversy. Mariner’s radiometer would be able to provide
something like one hundred times better resolution than the Earth-based
measurements.</p>
<p>At 11:59 a.m., PST, on December 14, 1962, Mariner’s radiometers
began to scan the planet Venus in a nodding motion at a rate of 0.1
degree per second and reaching an angular sweep of nominally 120
degrees. The radiometers had been switched on 6½ hours before the
encounter with Venus and they continued to operate for another hour
afterward.</p>
<p>The microwave radiometer looked at Venus at a wavelength of 13.5
millimeters and 19 millimeters. The 13.5-millimeter region was the location
of a microwave water absorption band within the electromagnetic
spectrum, but it was not anticipated that it would detect any water vapor
on Venus. These measurements would allow determination of atmospheric
radiation, averaging the hot temperatures near the surface, the warmer
clouds at lower levels, and the lower temperatures found in the high
atmosphere. If the atmosphere were a strong absorber of microwave
<span class="pb" id="Page_104">104</span>
energy at 13.5 millimeters, only the temperature of the upper layers
would be reported.</p>
<p>Unaffected by water vapor, 19-millimeter radiations could be detected
from deeper down into the cloud cover, perhaps from near or at the
planet’s surface. Large temperature differences between the 19- and 13.5
millimeter readings would indicate the relative amount of water vapor
present in the atmosphere. The 19-millimeter radiations would also test
the limb-brightening theory.</p>
<p>During its scanning operation, Mariner telemetered back to Earth about
18 digital data points, represented as voltage fluctuations in relation to
time. The first scan was on the dark side, going up on the planet: the
distance from the surface was 16,479 miles at midscan, and the brightness
temperature was 369 degrees F. The second scan nearly paralleled
the terminator (junction of light and dark sides) but crossed it going
down; it was made from 14,957 miles at midscan and showed a temperature
of 566 degrees F. The final scan, 13,776 miles at midpoint, showed
261 degrees F as it swept across the sunlit side of Venus in an upward
direction.</p>
<p>The brightness temperature recorded by Mariner’s radiometer is not
the true temperature of the surface. It is derived from the amount of light
or radio energy reflected or emitted by an object. If the object is not a
perfect light emitter, as most are not, then the light and radio energy will
be some fraction of that returned from a 100% efficient body, and the
object is really hotter than the brightness measurement shows. Thus, the
brightness temperature is a minimum reading and in this case, was lower
than the actual surface temperature.</p>
<p>Mariner’s microwave radiometer showed no significant difference between
the light and dark sides of Venus and, importantly, higher temperatures
along the terminator or night-and-day line of the planet. These
results would indicate no ionosphere supercharged with electrons, but a
definite limb-darkening effect, since the edges were cooler than the center
of the planet.</p>
<p>Therefore, considering the absorption characteristics of the atmosphere
and the emissivity factor derived from earlier JPL radar experiments, a
fairly uniform 800 degrees F was estimated as a preliminary temperature
figure for the entire surface.</p>
<p>Venus is, indeed, a very hot planet.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_105">105</div>
<h3 id="c59">CLOUD TEMPERATURES: THE INFRARED READINGS</h3>
<p>Mariner II took a close look at Venus’ clouds with its infrared radiometer
during its 35-minute encounter with the planet. This instrument was
firmly attached to the microwave radiometer so the two devices would
scan the same areas of Venus at the same rate and the data would be
closely correlated. This arrangement was necessary to produce in effect a
stereoscopic view of the planet from two different regions of the spectrum.</p>
<p>Because astronomers have long conjectured about the irregular dark
spots discernible on the surface of Venus’ atmosphere, data to resolve
these questions would be of great scientific interest. If the spots were
indeed breaks in the clouds, they would stand out with much better
definition in the infrared spectrum. If the radiation came from the cloud
tops, there would be no breaks and the temperatures at both frequencies
measured by the infrared radiometer would follow essentially the same
pattern.</p>
<p>The Venusian atmosphere is transparent to the 8-micron region of the
spectrum except for clouds. In the 10-micron range, the lower atmosphere
would be hidden by carbon dioxide. If cloud breaks existed, the 8-micron
emissions would come from a much lower point, since the lower atmosphere
is fairly transparent at this wavelength. If increasing temperatures
were shown in this region, it might mean that some radiation was coming
up from the surface.</p>
<p>As a result of the Mariner II mission, scientists have hypothecated
that the cold cloud cover could be about 15 miles thick, with the lower
base beginning about 45 miles above the surface, and the top occurring
at 60 miles. In this case, the bottom of the cloud layer could be approximately
200 degrees F; at the top, the readings vary from about minus
30 degrees F in the center of the planet to temperatures of perhaps
minus 60 degrees to minus 70 degrees F along the edges. This temperature
gradient would verify the limb-darkening effect seen by the microwave
radiometer.</p>
<p>At the center of Venus, the radiometer saw a thicker, brighter, hotter
part of the cloud layer; at the limbs, it could not see so deeply and
the colder upper layers were visible. Furthermore, the temperatures
along the cloud tops were approximately equally distributed, indicating
that both 8- and 10-micron “channels” penetrated to the same depth and
that both were looking at thick, dense clouds quite opaque to infrared
radiation.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_106">106</div>
<p>Both channels detected a curious feature along the lower portion of
the terminator, or the center line between the night and day sides of the
planet. In that region, a spot was shown that was apparently about 20
degrees F colder than the rest of the cloud layer. Such an anomaly could
result from higher or more opaque clouds, or from such an irregularity as
a hidden surface feature. A mountain could force the clouds upward,
thus cooling them further, but it would have to be extremely high.</p>
<p>The data allow scientists to deduce that not enough carbon dioxide
was present above the clouds for appreciable absorption in the 10-micron
region. This effect would seem to indicate that the clouds are thick and
that there is little radiation coming up from the surface. And, if present,
water vapor content might be 1/1,000 of that in the Earth’s atmosphere.</p>
<p>Since the cloud base is apparently at a very high temperature, neither
carbon dioxide nor water is likely to be present in quantity. Rather, the
base of the clouds must contain some component that will condense in
small quantities and not be spectroscopically detected.</p>
<p>As a result of the two radiometer experiments, the region below the
clouds and the surface itself take on better definition. Certainly, heat-trapping
of infrared radiation, or a “greenhouse” effect, must be expected
to support the 800 degree F surface temperature estimated from the
microwave radiometer data. Thus, a considerable amount of energy-blanketing
carbon dioxide must be present below the cloud base. It is
thought that some of the near-infrared sunlight might filter through the
clouds in small amounts, so that the sky would not be entirely black, at
least to human eyes, on the sunlit side of Venus. There also may be some
very small content of oxygen below the clouds, and perhaps considerable
amounts of nitrogen.</p>
<p>The atmospheric pressure on the surface might be very high, about 20
times the Earth’s atmosphere or more (equivalent to about 600 inches
of mercury, compared with our 30 inches). The surface, despite the high
temperature, is not likely to be molten because of the roughness index
seen in the earlier radar experiments, and other indicators. However, the
possibility of small molten metal lakes cannot be totally ignored.</p>
<p>The dense, high-pressure atmosphere and the heat-capturing greenhouse
effect could combine over long periods of time to carry the extremely
high temperature around to the dark side of Venus, despite the
slow rate of rotation, possibly accounting for the relatively uniform
surface temperatures apparently found by Mariner II.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_107">107</div>
<h3 id="c60">THE RADAR PROFILE: MEASUREMENTS FROM EARTH</h3>
<p>In 1961, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory conducted a series of experiments
from its Goldstone, California, DSIF Station, successfully bouncing
radar signals off the planet Venus and receiving the return signal after it
had travelled 70 million miles in 6½ minutes.</p>
<p>In order to complement the Mariner mission to Venus, the radar
experiments were repeated from October to December, 1962 (during the
Mariner mission), using improved equipment and refined techniques. As
in 1961, the experiments were directed by W. K. Victor and R. Stevens.</p>
<p>The 1961 experiments used two 85-foot antennas, one transmitting 13
kilowatts of power at 2,388 megacycles, the other receiving the return
signal after the round trip to and from Venus. The most important result
was the refinement of the astronomical unit—the mean distance from the
Earth to the Sun—to a value of 92,956,200 ±300 miles.</p>
<p>Around 1910, the astronomical unit, plotted by classical optical methods,
was uncertain to 250,000 miles. Before the introduction of radar
astronomy techniques such as those used at Goldstone, scientists believed
that the astronomical unit was known to within 60,000 miles, but even
this factor of uncertainty would be intolerable for planetary exploration.</p>
<p>In radar astronomy, the transit time of a radio signal moving at the
speed of light (186,000 miles per second) is measured as it travels to a
planet and back. In conjunction with the angular measurement techniques
used by earlier investigators, this method permits a more precise calculation
of the astronomical unit.</p>
<p>Optical and radar measurements of the astronomical unit differ by
50,000 miles. Further refinement of both techniques should lessen the
discrepancy between the two values.</p>
<p>The 1961 tests also established that Venus rotates at a very slow rate,
possibly keeping the same face toward the Sun at all times. The reflection
coefficient of the planet was estimated at 12%, a bright value similar to
that of the Earth and contrasted with the Moon’s 2%. The average
dielectric constant (conductivity factor) of the surface material seemed
to be close to that of sand or dust, and the surface was reported to be
rough at a wavelength of 6 inches.</p>
<p>The surface roughness was confirmed in 1962. Since it is known that
a rough surface will scatter a signal, the radar tests were observed for
such indications. Venus had a scattering effect on the radar waves similar
<span class="pb" id="Page_108">108</span>
to the Moon’s, probably establishing the roughness of the Venusian surface
as more or less similar to the lunar terrain.</p>
<p>Some of the most interesting work was done in reference to the rotation
rate of Venus. A radar signal will spread in frequency on return from a
target planet that is rotating and rough enough to reflect from a considerable
area of its surface. The spread of 5 to 10 cycles per second noted
on the Venus echo would suggest a very slow rotation rate, perhaps
keeping the same face toward the Sun, or possibly even in a retrograde
direction, opposite to the Earth’s.</p>
<p>In the Goldstone 1962 experiments, Venus was in effect divided into
observation zones and the doppler effect or change in the returned signal
from these zones was studied. The rate of rotation was derived from
three months of sampling with this radar mapping technique. Also, the
clear, sharp tone characteristic of the transmitted radar signal was altered
on return from Venus into a fuzzy, indistinct sound. This effect seemed
to confirm the slow retrograde rotation (as compared with the Earth)
indicated by the radar mapping and frequency change method.</p>
<p>In addition to these methods of deducing the slow rotation rate, two
other phenomena seemed to verify it: a slowly fluctuating signal strength,
and the apparent progression of a bright radar spot across from the center
of Venus toward the outside edge.</p>
<p>As a result, JPL scientists revised their 1961 estimate of an equal
Venusian day and year consisting of 225 Earth days. The new value for
Venus’ rotation rate around its axis is 230 Earth days plus or minus 40
to 50 days, and in a retrograde direction (opposite to synchronous or
Sun-facing), assuming that Venus rotates on an axis perpendicular to the
plane of its orbit.</p>
<p>Thus, on Venus the Sun would appear to rise in the west and cross to
the east about once each Venusian year. If the period were exactly 225
days retrograde, the stars would remain stationary in the sky and Venus
would always face a given star rather than the Sun.</p>
<p>A space traveller hovering several million miles directly above the
Sun would thus see Venus as almost stopped in its rotation and possibly
turning very slowly clockwise. All the other planets of our system including
the Earth, rotate counterclockwise, except Uranus, whose axis is
almost parallel to the plane of its orbit, making it seem to roll around
the Sun on its side. The rotation direction of distant Pluto is unknown.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_109">109</div>
<p>The Goldstone experiments also studied what is known as the Faraday
rotation of the plane of polarization of a radio wave. The results indicated
that the ionization and magnetic field around Venus are very low.
These data tend to confirm those gathered by Mariner’s experiments close
to the planet.</p>
<p>The mass of Venus was another value that had never been precisely
established. The mass of planetary bodies is determined by their gravitational
effect on other bodies, such as satellites. Since Venus has no
known natural satellite or moon, Mariner, approaching closely enough
to “feel” its gravity, would provide the first opportunity for close measurement.</p>
<p>The distortion caused by Venus on Mariner’s trajectory as the spacecraft
passed the planet enabled scientists to calculate the mass with an
error probability of 0.015%. The value arrived at is 0.81485 of the mass
of the Earth, which is known to be approximately 13.173 septillion
(13,173,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) pounds. Thus, the mass of Venus
is approximately 10.729 septillion (10,729,408,500,000,000,000,000,000)
pounds.</p>
<p>In addition to these measurements, the extremely precise tracking system
used on Mariner proved the feasibility of long-range tracking in
space, particularly in radial velocity, which was measured to within 1/10
of an inch per second at a distance of about 54 million miles.</p>
<p>As the mission progressed, the trajectory was corrected with respect
to Venus to within 10 miles at encounter. An interesting result was the
very precise location of the Goldstone and overseas tracking stations of
the DSIF. Before Mariner II, these locations were known to within 100
yards. After all the data have been analyzed, these locations will be redefined
or “relocated” to within an error of only 20 yards.</p>
<p>Mariner not only made the first successful journey to Venus—it also
helped pinpoint spots in the Californian and Australian deserts and the
South African veldt with an accuracy never before achieved.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_110">110</div>
<h2 id="c61"><span class="smaller">CHAPTER</span> 10
<br />THE NEW LOOK OF VENUS</h2>
<p>The historic mission of Mariner II to the near-vicinity of Venus and
beyond has enabled scientists to revise many of their concepts of interplanetary
space and the planet Venus.</p>
<p>The composite picture, taken from the six experiments aboard the
spacecraft and the data from the DSIF radar experiments of 1961 and
1962 revealed the following:</p>
<ul><li>Interplanetary space between the Earth and Venus, at least as it was during the four months of Mariner’s mission, had a cosmic dust density some ten-thousand times lower than the region immediately surrounding the Earth.</li>
<li>During this period, the extremely tenuous, widely fluctuating solar winds streamed continually out from the Sun, at velocities ranging from 200 to 500 miles per second.</li>
<li>An astronaut travelling through these regions in the last quarter of 1962 would not have been seriously affected by the cosmic and high-energy radiation from space and the Sun. He could easily have survived many times the amount of radiation detected by Mariner’s instruments.</li>
<li class="pb" id="Page_111">111</li>
<li>The astronomical unit, as determined by radar, the yardstick of our solar system, stands at 92,956,200, plus or minus 300 miles.</li>
<li>The mass of Venus in relation to the Earth’s is 0.81485, with an error probability of 0.015%.</li>
<li>The rotation rate of Venus is quite slow and is now estimated as equal to 230 Earth days, plus or minus 40 to 50 days. The rotation might be retrograde, clockwise with respect to a Sun-facing reference, with the Sun rising in the west and setting in the east approximately one Venusian year later. The planet seems to remain nearly star-fixed rather than permanently oriented with one face to the Sun.</li>
<li>Venus has no magnetic field discernible at the 21,598-mile approach of Mariner II and at that altitude there were no regions of trapped high-energy particles or radiation belts, as there are near the Earth.</li>
<li>The clouds of Venus are about 15 miles thick, extending from a base 45 miles above the surface to a top altitude of about 60 miles.</li>
<li>At the resolution of the Mariner II infrared radiometer, there were no apparent breaks in the cloud cover. Cloud-top temperature readings are about minus 30 degrees F near the center (along the terminator), and ranging down to minus 60 degrees to minus 70 degrees F at the limbs, showing an apparent limb-darkening effect, which would indicate a hot surface and the absence of a supercharged ionosphere.</li>
<li>A spot 20 degrees F colder than the surrounding area exists along the terminator in the southern hemisphere: a high mountain could exist in this region, but such an hypothesis is purely conjectural. A bright radar reflection is also found on the Equator in the same general region. Causes of these phenomena are not established.</li>
<li>At their base, the clouds are about 200 degrees F and probably are comprised of condensed hydrocarbons held in oily suspension. Below the clouds, the atmosphere must be heavily charged with carbon dioxide, may contain slight traces of oxygen, and probably has a strong concentration of nitrogen.</li>
<li class="pb" id="Page_112">112</li>
<li>As determined by the microwave radiometer, Venus’ surface temperature averages approximately 800 degrees F on both light and dark sides of the planet. Some roughness is indicated and the surface reflectivity is equivalent to that of dust and sand. No water could be present at the surface but there is some possibility of small lakes of molten metal of one type or another.</li>
<li>Some reddish sunlight, in the filterable infrared spectrum, may find its way through the 15-mile-thick cloud cover, but the surface is probably very bleak.</li>
<li>The heavy, dense atmosphere creates a surface pressure of some twenty times that found on the Earth, or equal to about 600 inches of mercury.</li></ul>
<p>The mission was completed and the spacecraft had gone into an endless
orbit around the Sun. But before Mariner II lost its sing-song voice,
it produced 13 million data words of computer space lyrics to accompany
the music of the spheres.</p>
<div class="pb" id="Page_113">113</div>
<h2 id="c62">APPENDIX
<br />SUBCONTRACTORS</h2>
<p>Thirty-four subcontractors to JPL provided instruments and other hardware
for Mariners I and II.</p>
<p>The subcontractors were:</p>
<table class="center" summary="">
<tr><td class="l">Aeroflex Corporation<br />Long Island City, New York </td><td class="l">Jet vane actuators</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">American Electronics, Inc.<br />Fullerton, California </td><td class="l">Transformer-rectifiers for flight telecommunications</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Ampex Corporation<br />Instrumentation Division<br />Redwood City, California </td><td class="l">Tape recorders for ground telemetry and data handling equipment</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Applied Development Corporation<br />Monterey Park, California </td><td class="l">Decommutators and teletype encoders for ground telemetry equipment</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Astrodata, Inc.<br />Anaheim, California </td><td class="l">Time code translators, time code generators, and spacecraft signal simulators for ground telemetry equipment</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Barnes Engineering Company<br />Stamford, Connecticut </td><td class="l">Infrared radiometers<br />Planet simulator</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Bell Aerospace Corporation<br />Bell Aerosystems Division<br />Cleveland, Ohio </td><td class="l">Accelerometers and associated electronic modules</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Computer Control Company, Inc.<br />Framingham, Massachusetts </td><td class="l">Data conditioning systems</td></tr>
<tr class="pbtr"><td colspan="2">
</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Conax Corporation<br />Buffalo, New York </td><td class="l">Midcourse propulsion explosive valves<br />Squibs</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Consolidated Electrodynamics Corp.<br />Pasadena, California </td><td class="l">Oscillographs for data reduction</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Consolidated Systems Corporation<br />Monrovia, California </td><td class="l">Scientific instruments<br />Operational support equipment</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Dynamics Instrumentation Company<br />Monterey Park, California </td><td class="l">Isolation amplifiers for telemetry<br />Operational support equipment</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Electric Storage Battery Company<br />Missile Battery Division<br />Raleigh, North Carolina </td><td class="l">Spacecraft batteries</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Electro-Optical Systems, Inc.<br />Pasadena, California </td><td class="l">Spacecraft power conversion equipment</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Fargo Rubber Corporation<br />Los Angeles, California </td><td class="l">Midcourse propulsion fuel tank bladders</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Glentronics, Inc.<br />Glendora, California </td><td class="l">Power supplies for data conditioning system</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Groen Associates<br />Sun Valley, California </td><td class="l">Actuators for solar panels</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Houston Fearless Corporation<br />Torrance, California </td><td class="l">Pin pullers</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Kearfott Division<br />General Precision, Inc.<br />Los Angeles, California </td><td class="l">Gyroscopes</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Marshall Laboratories<br />Torrance, California </td><td class="l">Magnetometers and associated operational support equipment</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Matrix Research and Development Corporation<br />Nashua, New Hampshire </td><td class="l">Power supplies for particle flux detectors</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Menasco Manufacturing Company<br />Burbank, California </td><td class="l">Midcourse propulsion fuel tanks and nitrogen tanks</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Midwestern Instruments<br />Tulsa, Oklahoma </td><td class="l">Oscillographs for data reduction</td></tr>
<tr class="pbtr"><td colspan="2">
</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Mincom Division<br />Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing<br />Los Angeles, California </td><td class="l">Tape recorders for ground telemetry and data handling equipment</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Motorola, Inc.<br />Military Electronics Division<br />Scottsdale, Arizona </td><td class="l">Spacecraft command subsystems, transponders, and associated operational support equipment</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Nortronics<br />Division of Northrop Corporation<br />Palos Verdes Estates, California </td><td class="l">Attitude control gyro electronic, autopilot electronic, and antenna servo electronic modules, long-range Earth sensors and Sun sensors</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Ransom Research<br />Division of Wyle Laboratories<br />San Pedro, California </td><td class="l">Verification and ground command modulation equipment</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Rantec Corporation<br />Calabasas, California </td><td class="l">Transponder circulators and monitors</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Ryan Aeronautical Company<br />Aerospace Division<br />San Diego, California </td><td class="l">Solar panel structures</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Spectrolab<br />Division of Textron Electronics, Inc.<br />North Hollywood, California </td><td class="l">Solar cells and their installation and electrical connection on solar panels</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">State University of Iowa<br />Iowa City, Iowa </td><td class="l">Calibrated Geiger counters</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Sterer Engineering & Manufacturing Company<br />North Hollywood, California </td><td class="l">Valves and regulators for midcourse propulsion and attitude control systems</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Texas Instruments, Inc.<br />Apparatus Division<br />Dallas, Texas </td><td class="l">Spacecraft data encoders and associated operational support equipment, ground telemetry demodulators</td></tr>
<tr><td class="l">Trans-Sonic, Inc.<br />Burlington, Massachusetts </td><td class="l">Transducers</td></tr>
</table>
<p>In addition to these subcontractors, over 1,000 other industrial firms
contributed to the Mariner Project.</p>
<h2>FOOTNOTES</h2>
<div class="fnblock"><div class="fndef"><a class="fn" id="fn_1" href="#fr_1">[1]</a>Throughout this book “Mariner” refers to the successful Mariner II Venus mission.
Mariner I was launched earlier but was destroyed when the launch vehicle flew off course.
</div><div class="fndef"><a class="fn" id="fn_2" href="#fr_2">[2]</a>For scientific reasons, distances from Venus are calculated from the center of the planet.
Hereafter in this chapter, these distances will be reckoned from the surface.
</div>
</div>
<div class="pb" id="Page_116">116</div>
<h2 id="c63">INDEX</h2>
<p class="center"><a href="#index_A" class="ab">A</a> <a href="#index_B" class="ab">B</a> <a href="#index_C" class="ab">C</a> <a href="#index_D" class="ab">D</a> <a href="#index_E" class="ab">E</a> <span class="ab">F</span> <a href="#index_G" class="ab">G</a> <a href="#index_H" class="ab">H</a> <a href="#index_I" class="ab">I</a> <a href="#index_J" class="ab">J</a> <span class="ab">K</span> <a href="#index_L" class="ab">L</a> <a href="#index_M" class="ab">M</a>
<br /><a href="#index_N" class="ab">N</a> <span class="ab">O</span> <a href="#index_P" class="ab">P</a> <span class="ab">Q</span> <a href="#index_R" class="ab">R</a> <a href="#index_S" class="ab">S</a> <a href="#index_T" class="ab">T</a> <span class="ab">U</span> <a href="#index_V" class="ab">V</a> <a href="#index_W" class="ab">W</a> <span class="ab">X</span> <span class="ab">Y</span> <span class="ab">Z</span></p>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_A"><b>A</b></dt>
<dt>ABMA, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></dt>
<dt>Agena B, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_40">40</a></dt>
<dt>Antennas, <a href="#Page_66">66</a></dt>
<dd>Goldstone, description, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a></dd>
<dd>onboard, description, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a></dd>
<dd class="ddt">directional control, <a href="#Page_30">30</a></dd>
<dd>Pioneer tracking site, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a></dd>
<dt>ARPA, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></dt>
<dt>Astronomical unit, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></dt>
<dd>refinement, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></dd>
<dt>Atlantic Missile Range, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></dt>
<dt>Atlas-Agena B, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a></dt>
<dt>Atlas D, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>-39, <a href="#Page_89">89</a></dt>
<dt>Attitude control</dt>
<dd>Atlas D, <a href="#Page_38">38</a></dd>
<dd>Earth acquisition, <a href="#Page_58">58</a></dd>
<dd>loss of control and reorientation, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a></dd>
<dt>Attitude control system, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_32">32</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_B"><b>B</b></dt>
<dt>Battery, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></dt>
<dt>Bumper-WAC, <a href="#Page_18">18</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_C"><b>C</b></dt>
<dt>C-133 aircraft, <a href="#Page_43">43</a></dt>
<dt>Centaur, <a href="#Page_8">8</a></dt>
<dt>Central Computer and Sequencer, <a href="#Page_28">28</a></dt>
<dd>commands, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a></dd>
<dd>failure at encounter, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></dd>
<dd>midcourse maneuver control, <a href="#Page_59">59</a></dd>
<dt>Central Computing Facility, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a></dt>
<dt>Charged particles, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_90">90</a></dt>
<dt>Charged particle detector, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></dt>
<dt>Computers, data processing, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></dt>
<dt>Corporal E, <a href="#Page_18">18</a></dt>
<dt>Cosmic dust, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></dt>
<dd>density, <a href="#Page_110">110</a></dd>
<dd>distribution and mass, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a></dd>
<dd>measurement, <a href="#Page_89">89</a></dd>
<dt>Cosmic dust detector, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a></dt>
<dt>Cosmic radiation, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></dt>
<dt>Cosmic ray flux, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_D"><b>D</b></dt>
<dt>Data conditioning system, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></dt>
<dt>Data processing, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a></dt>
<dd>CCF, equipment and operation, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></dd>
<dd>launch and tracking operations, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></dd>
<dd>telemetry data, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></dd>
<dd>transmission time, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></dd>
<dt>Detectors</dt>
<dd>charged particle, <a href="#Page_35">35</a></dd>
<dd>cosmic dust, <a href="#Page_35">35</a></dd>
<dd>solar plasma, <a href="#Page_35">35</a></dd>
<dt>DSIF, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></dt>
<dd>functions, <a href="#Page_68">68</a></dd>
<dd>Goldstone, <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>-79, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></dd>
<dd>Johannesburg, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a></dd>
<dd>Mobile, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a></dd>
<dd>tracking during midcourse maneuver, <a href="#Page_56">56</a></dd>
<dd>orientation, <a href="#Page_56">56</a></dd>
<dd>Woomera, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a></dd>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_E"><b>E</b></dt>
<dt>Earth sensor</dt>
<dd>final orientation commands, <a href="#Page_64">64</a></dd>
<dd>September 8, crises and recovery, <a href="#Page_60">60</a></dd>
<dt>Echo Project, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></dt>
<dt>Echo site functions, <a href="#Page_71">71</a></dt>
<dt>Electronics equipment weight, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></dt>
<dt>Explorer I, <a href="#Page_19">19</a></dt>
<dt>Experiments, <a href="#Page_35">35</a></dt>
<dd>Anton special purpose tube, <a href="#Page_87">87</a></dd>
<dd>atmospheric investigation, <a href="#Page_85">85</a></dd>
<dd>charged particle detector, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>-100</dd>
<dd class="ddt">density variation data, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></dd>
<dd class="ddt">radiation hazard findings, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></dd>
<dd>cosmic dust detector data, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>-89, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a></dd>
<dd>high energy radiation, <a href="#Page_90">90</a></dd>
<dd>infrared radiometer, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a></dd>
<dd>ion chamber and Geiger-Mueller tubes, <a href="#Page_87">87</a></dd>
<dd>magnetometers, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></dd>
<dd>microwave radiometer, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>-93</dd>
<dd>objectives, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a></dd>
<dd>processing of data, <a href="#Page_85">85</a></dd>
<dd>radiometers, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></dd>
<dd>responsible organizations, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></dd>
<dd>results, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>-112</dd>
<dd>solar plasma detector, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>-90</dd>
<dd>temperature investigation, <a href="#Page_85">85</a></dd>
<dd>transmission of data, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></dd>
<dd>weight, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></dd>
</dl>
<div class="pb" id="Page_117">117</div>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_G"><b>G</b></dt>
<dt>Geiger counter, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></dt>
<dt>Geiger-Mueller tubes, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></dt>
<dt>George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></dt>
<dt>Goldstone Tracking Station, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></dt>
<dd>Echo site, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a></dd>
<dd>Pioneer site, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a></dd>
<dd>Venus site, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a></dd>
<dt>Guidance, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_H"><b>H</b></dt>
<dt>High-energy radiation experiments, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_I"><b>I</b></dt>
<dt>Infrared radiometer experiment</dt>
<dd>cloud observations, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></dd>
<dd>description, <a href="#Page_93">93</a></dd>
<dd>dimensions, <a href="#Page_93">93</a></dd>
<dd>operating characteristics, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a></dd>
<dt>Interplanetary magnetic field, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></dt>
<dt>Interplanetary space</dt>
<dd>cosmic dust density, <a href="#Page_110">110</a></dd>
<dd class="ddt">distribution, <a href="#Page_95">95</a></dd>
<dd>hazards to spacecraft, <a href="#Page_13">13</a></dd>
<dt>Ion chamber, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_J"><b>J</b></dt>
<dt>Johannesburg tracking station, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a></dt>
<dd>equipment, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a></dd>
<dd>functions, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a></dd>
<dt>JPL, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></dt>
<dd>accomplishments, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="#Page_19">19</a></dd>
<dd>background, <a href="#Page_18">18</a></dd>
<dd>DSIF control point, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a></dd>
<dd>pre-Mariner spacecraft, <a href="#Page_23">23</a></dd>
<dt>Jupiter, contrast to Venus, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></dt>
<dt>Jupiter C, <a href="#Page_19">19</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_L"><b>L</b></dt>
<dt>Launch Operations Center, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></dt>
<dt>Launching, <a href="#Page_56">56</a></dt>
<dd>Atlas performance, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a></dd>
<dd>Atlas-Agena B, <a href="#Page_52">52</a></dd>
<dd>battery, <a href="#Page_52">52</a></dd>
<dd>gyroscopes, <a href="#Page_53">53</a></dd>
<dd>radio guidance system, <a href="#Page_52">52</a></dd>
<dd>time limitations, <a href="#Page_12">12</a></dd>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_M"><b>M</b></dt>
<dt>Magnetometer experiment, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></dt>
<dd>data, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a></dd>
<dd>description, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></dd>
<dd>function, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></dd>
<dd>objectives, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></dd>
<dd>onboard location, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></dd>
<dt>Mariner I, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>-45</dt>
<dt>Mariner R, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></dt>
<dt>Masers, <a href="#Page_70">70</a></dt>
<dt>Materials, thermal shielding, <a href="#Page_33">33</a></dt>
<dt>Microwave radiometer experiment</dt>
<dd>description, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></dd>
<dd>function, <a href="#Page_91">91</a></dd>
<dd>measurements, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></dd>
<dd>operating characteristics, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>-93</dd>
<dt>Midcourse maneuver, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>-59, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></dt>
<dt>Mission achievements, records, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></dt>
<dt>Mobile tracking station, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a></dt>
<dd>location, equipment and function, <a href="#Page_73">73</a></dd>
<dt>MX-774 Project, <a href="#Page_21">21</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_N"><b>N</b></dt>
<dt>NACA, precursor of NASA, <a href="#Page_16">16</a></dt>
<dt>NASA, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_P"><b>P</b></dt>
<dt>Parking orbit, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></dt>
<dt>Pioneer III, <a href="#Page_19">19</a></dt>
<dt>Pioneer IV, <a href="#Page_19">19</a></dt>
<dt>Pioneer project, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></dt>
<dt>Pioneer tracking site, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a></dt>
<dt>Power system, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></dt>
<dt>Private A, <a href="#Page_18">18</a></dt>
<dt>Propellants</dt>
<dd>Atlas D, <a href="#Page_38">38</a></dd>
<dd>attitude control system, <a href="#Page_32">32</a></dd>
<dd>spacecraft, controlled burning, <a href="#Page_32">32</a></dd>
<dd class="ddt">rocket thrust system, <a href="#Page_32">32</a></dd>
<dt>Propulsion system, Mariner</dt>
<dd>spacecraft, hydrazine propellant, <a href="#Page_33">33</a></dd>
<dd class="ddt">propellant storage, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a></dd>
<dd>weight, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></dd>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_R"><b>R</b></dt>
<dt>Radiation, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>-100</dt>
<dt>Ranger III, <a href="#Page_8">8</a></dt>
<dt>Receivers, <a href="#Page_66">66</a></dt>
<dt>Records, Mariner</dt>
<dd>attitude control system, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></dd>
<dd>measurements near Sun, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></dd>
<dd>operation near Venus</dd>
<dd>telemetry measurements, distance, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></dd>
<dd>trajectory correction maneuver, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></dd>
<dd>transmission, continuous performance, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></dd>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_S"><b>S</b></dt>
<dt>Sensors</dt>
<dd>Earth, for attitude control, <a href="#Page_32">32</a></dd>
<dd>Sun, for attitude control, <a href="#Page_32">32</a></dd>
<dt>Sergeant missile, <a href="#Page_19">19</a></dt>
<dt>Shielding, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a></dt>
<dt>Solar cells, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a></dt>
<dt>Solar flares, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></dt>
<dt>Solar panels</dt>
<dd>description, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></dd>
<dd>design, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></dd>
<dd>output deterioration, <a href="#Page_61">61</a></dd>
<dd>release, <a href="#Page_11">11</a></dd>
<dd>support, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></dd>
<dd>weight, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></dd>
<dt>Solar plasma detector, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></dt>
<dd>description, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_90">90</a></dd>
<dd>function, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_90">90</a></dd>
<dd>recordings, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></dd>
<dt>Solar plasma flux</dt>
<dd>correlation with geomagnetic effects, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></dd>
<dt class="pb" id="Page_118">118</dt>
<dt>Solar wind</dt>
<dd>effects on cosmic-ray movements, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></dd>
<dd class="ddt">magnetic fields, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></dd>
<dd>low density and energy, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></dd>
<dd>measurement, <a href="#Page_89">89</a></dd>
<dd>particle concentration near Earth, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></dd>
<dd>particle energies, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></dd>
<dd>temperature, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></dd>
<dd>theories, <a href="#Page_95">95</a></dd>
<dd>velocities, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a></dd>
<dt>Space Flight Operations Center, <a href="#Page_60">60</a></dt>
<dd>organization and operation, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></dd>
<dt>Space simulator, temperature control, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></dt>
<dt>Spacecraft, <a href="#Page_31">31</a></dt>
<dd>attitude control system, <a href="#Page_31">31</a></dd>
<dd>Central Computer and Sequencer, <a href="#Page_28">28</a></dd>
<dd>components and subsystems, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></dd>
<dd>configuration, <a href="#Page_23">23</a></dd>
<dd>electronic equipment, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></dd>
<dd>frame materials, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></dd>
<dd>launching, <a href="#Page_12">12</a></dd>
<dd>power system, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></dd>
<dd>preliminary design, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></dd>
<dd>propulsion system, <a href="#Page_32">32</a></dd>
<dd>shroud and adapter, <a href="#Page_43">43</a></dd>
<dd>system tests, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></dd>
<dd>telecommunications subsystem, <a href="#Page_30">30</a></dd>
<dd>temperature, <a href="#Page_33">33</a></dd>
<dd>test models, <a href="#Page_41">41</a></dd>
<dd>testing, <a href="#Page_23">23</a></dd>
<dd>trajectory, <a href="#Page_11">11</a></dd>
<dd>weight, <a href="#Page_25">25</a></dd>
<dt>Sun sensor, <a href="#Page_32">32</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_T"><b>T</b></dt>
<dt>Telemetry</dt>
<dd>continuous transmission, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></dd>
<dd>data processing, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></dd>
<dd>description, <a href="#Page_30">30</a></dd>
<dd>loss of monitoring data, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></dd>
<dd>phase-shift modulation, <a href="#Page_30">30</a></dd>
<dd>transmission cutoff, <a href="#Page_64">64</a></dd>
<dt>Telemetry processing station, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></dt>
<dt>Telemetry system</dt>
<dd>data processing, <a href="#Page_30">30</a></dd>
<dd>onboard, description, <a href="#Page_30">30</a></dd>
<dt>Temperature control</dt>
<dd>coatings, <a href="#Page_34">34</a></dd>
<dd>heating problems, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></dd>
<dd>housing structures, <a href="#Page_35">35</a></dd>
<dd>materials, <a href="#Page_33">33</a></dd>
<dd>problems, <a href="#Page_33">33</a></dd>
<dd>solar panels, <a href="#Page_35">35</a></dd>
<dd>solar radiation shielding, <a href="#Page_35">35</a></dd>
<dd>thermal shielding, <a href="#Page_33">33</a></dd>
<dt>Tracking</dt>
<dd>Antigua, <a href="#Page_53">53</a></dd>
<dd>Ascension, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></dd>
<dd>DSIF, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a></dd>
<dd>Earth noise, <a href="#Page_66">66</a></dd>
<dd>Grand Bahama Island, <a href="#Page_53">53</a></dd>
<dd>Johannesburg, <a href="#Page_56">56</a></dd>
<dd>Pretoria, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></dd>
<dd>problems, <a href="#Page_66">66</a></dd>
<dd>radio noise, <a href="#Page_66">66</a></dd>
<dd>San Salvador, <a href="#Page_53">53</a></dd>
<dd>solar noise, <a href="#Page_66">66</a></dd>
<dd>Twin Falls Victory, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></dd>
<dd>Whiskey, <a href="#Page_55">55</a></dd>
<dd>Woomera, <a href="#Page_56">56</a></dd>
<dt>Trajectory, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_V"><b>V</b></dt>
<dt>V-2 rocket, <a href="#Page_18">18</a></dt>
<dt>Van Allen radiation belt, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a></dt>
<dt>Venus</dt>
<dd>atmosphere, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_112">112</a></dd>
<dd>atmospheric temperature, <a href="#Page_85">85</a></dd>
<dd>atmospheric winds, <a href="#Page_5">5</a></dd>
<dd>CO₂ content above clouds, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></dd>
<dd>cloud cover, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></dd>
<dd>cloud observations, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></dd>
<dd>clouds, data, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></dd>
<dd>compared with Earth, <a href="#Page_5">5</a></dd>
<dd>description, <a href="#Page_4">4</a></dd>
<dd>dielectric constant, surface material, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></dd>
<dd>encounter, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a></dd>
<dd>historical data, <a href="#Page_2">2</a></dd>
<dd>inferior and superior conjunctions, <a href="#Page_4">4</a></dd>
<dd>magnetic field, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></dd>
<dd class="ddt">comparison with geomagnetic, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></dd>
<dd class="ddt">data, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a></dd>
<dd class="ddt">strength, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a></dd>
<dd>mass, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></dd>
<dd>orbit, <a href="#Page_4">4</a></dd>
<dd>radar experiments, 1961, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></dd>
<dd>radar experiments during mission, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></dd>
<dd>reflection coefficient, <a href="#Page_107">107</a></dd>
<dd>revolution, <a href="#Page_4">4</a></dd>
<dd>rotation, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></dd>
<dd>surface, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></dd>
<dd>brightness temperature, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a></dd>
<dd>characteristics, theories, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></dd>
<dd>“greenhouse” effect, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></dd>
<dd>measurements, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a></dd>
<dd>pressure, <a href="#Page_112">112</a></dd>
<dd>reflectivity, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></dd>
<dd>roughness, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a></dd>
<dd>temperature, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></dd>
<dd>temperature, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></dd>
<dd>topography, <a href="#Page_5">5</a></dd>
<dd>water vapor in atmosphere, <a href="#Page_106">106</a></dd>
<dt>Venus encounter, <a href="#Page_63">63</a></dt>
</dl>
<dl class="index">
<dt class="center" id="index_W"><b>W</b></dt>
<dt>WAC Corporal, <a href="#Page_18">18</a></dt>
<dt>Woomera Tracking Station, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a></dt>
<dd>equipment, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a></dd>
</dl>
<h2>Transcriber’s Notes</h2>
<ul>
<li>Retained publication information from the printed edition: this eBook is public-domain in the country of publication.</li>
<li>In the text versions only, text in italics is delimited by _underscores_.</li>
<li>Silently corrected a few typos.</li>
<li>In the index, entry “propellant storage”, replaced one nonsensical page number (200) with a plausible conjecture (38).</li>
</ul>
<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 54585 ***</div>
</body>
</html>
|
