summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/53290-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/53290-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/53290-0.txt2229
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2229 deletions
diff --git a/old/53290-0.txt b/old/53290-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 07006f3..0000000
--- a/old/53290-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,2229 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of Engravings of Lions, Tigers, Panthers,
-Leopards, Dogs, &c., by Thomas Landseer
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
-other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
-the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
-to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
-
-Title: Engravings of Lions, Tigers, Panthers, Leopards, Dogs, &c.
-
-Author: Thomas Landseer
-
-Illustrator: Edwin Henry Landseer
-
-Release Date: October 16, 2016 [EBook #53290]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGRAVINGS OF LIONS, TIGERS ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by MWS, ellinora and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images generously made available by The
-Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Transcriber’s Note
-
- Obvious typos and missing punctuation corrected.
-
- Antiquated use of ‘V’ for ‘U’, older spellings (e.g. opake),
- inconsistent spellings (e.g. artist names and work titles), and some
- inconsistencies in formatting of text have been retained.
-
- Work titles “Tiger Hunt” and “Tiger taking the Water” have been added
- to the captions of Plates XXXVI and XXXVII respectively.
-
- Small caps in the original are represented by ALL CAPS.
-
- Italics in the original are represented by underscores surrounding the
- _italic text_.
-
- Superscripts in the original are represented by a caret ^ preceding the
- raised character.
-
- The first plate shows a lion’s head breaking through an engraved
- tablet, removing some of the letters in the middle.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 1
-
- TWENTY ENGRAVINGS
- of
- LIONS TIGERS
- PANTHERS & LEOPARDS
- BY THO LANDSEER
-from ORIGINALS by STVBBS
-RVBENS SPILSBVRY.
-REMBRANT & EDWIN
-REYDINGER LANDSEER
-with an ESSAY on 1823
-the CARNIVORA
-by J. Lan]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- ENGRAVINGS
-
- OF
-
- LIONS, TIGERS,
- PANTHERS, LEOPARDS
- DOGS, &c.
-
- CHIEFLY AFTER THE DESIGNS OF
-
- SIR EDWIN LANDSEER,
-
- BY HIS BROTHER,
-
- THOMAS LANDSEER.
-
- PRINTED FROM THE ORIGINAL PLATES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1823 AND 1828.
-
-
- LONDON:
- HENRY G. BOHN, YORK STREET, COVENT GARDEN.
- MDCCCLIII.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- LIST OF PLATES.
-
-
- DESIGNER ENGRAVER
-
- 1 Lion couchant, _Frontispiece_ EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 2 Leopard, after Ridinger SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 3 Lions, after Rubens SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 4 Tiger, from Nature SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 5 Leopards, after Rubens SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 6 Contending Group, from Nature EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 7 Lion and Snake, from Nature SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 8 Senegal Lion and Lioness, after SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
- Ridinger
-
- 9 Lion and Tiger, after Stubbs SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 10 Tigress, from Nature T. LANDSEER _T. Landseer_
-
- 11 Lions, after Rubens SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 12 Panthers, after Stubbs SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 13 Panthers, after Stubbs SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 14 Leopards and Panthers, after Stubbs SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 15 Lions, after Rubens SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 16 Lions, after Rubens SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 17 Lioness and Bitch, from Cross’s EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- Menagerie LANDSEER
-
- 18 Lion, after Ridinger SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
-
- 19 Tiger and Indian Bullock, from Nature EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 20 { Senegal Lion, after Ridinger }
- { Black-maned Lion, after Rembrandt } SPILSBURY _T. Landseer_
- { Lioness, after Ridinger }
-
- 21 Neptune, a Newfoundland Dog EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 22 Brutus, a Terrier EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 23 Portrait of a Cross of the Dog and Fox EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 24 Dogs setting a Hare EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 25 Vixen, a Scotch Terrier EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 26 Fox Hounds of the Hatfield Hunt EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 27 Proctor, Study of a Blood-hound’s Head EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 28 Bob, a favourite Terrier EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 29 The Poacher, “The Wily Fox” EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 30 Alpine Mastiff EDWIN _T. Landseer_
- LANDSEER
-
- 31 Old Dog looks like a Picture EDWIN _J. Webb_
- LANDSEER
-
- 32 Fight between “Jacko Maccacco,” }
- a celebrated Monkey, } T.
- and Mr. Thos. Cribb’s } LANDSEER _T. Landseer_
- well known bitch “Puss” }
-
- 33 Little Billy, a celebrated Bull Dog T. LANDSEER _T. Landseer_
-
- 34 Black Cap, a Harrier’s head G. H. LAPORTE _T. Landseer_
-
- 35 Dead Red Deer EDWIN _J. R. Scott_
- LANDSEER
-
- 36 Tiger Hunt T. LANDSEER _T. Landseer_
-
- 37 Tiger taking the Water SIR C. _T. Landseer_
- D’OYLY, Bart.
-
- 38 Elephants returning from the Hunt SIR C. _T. Landseer_
- D’OYLY, Bart.
-
- 39 Red Deer R. HILLS _T. Landseer_
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- CARNIVOROUS QUADRUPEDS.
-
-
- DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES.
-
-That there has hitherto existed no good book of Engravings of the nobler
-wild animals, to assist the progress of the student in that department
-of Art, is to be regretted. The talents of Mr. JOHN SCOTT, brought into
-action by those of GILPIN, COOPER, and the REINAGLES, have presented the
-public with excellent representations of the distinguished ornaments of
-the turf: the sports of the field, and the habits and manners of the
-canine race, were also duly honoured: but of the ferocious TIGER tribe,
-and the lordly LION, we have nothing extant that would bear critical
-inspection, beyond a few detached prints:—nothing like a collection of
-figures, whose justness and accuracy of form, action, character, and
-expression, might be relied on.
-
-Does any reader imagine that the various Etchings which have been
-performed—chiefly abroad—by Artists of no mean ability, may be
-considered as exceptions? They are not exceptions: or at best, the
-number which might be so regarded is but small, and those, for the most
-part, of dimensions not accommodated to the drawer of the cabinet, or
-the shelf of the library.
-
-But they are not objectionable on this ground alone. Speaking of them in
-the aggregate, the heavier charge lies against them of being
-insufficient to those purposes of taste and information which are the
-ends of Art. Even those after TITIAN and after RUBENS (the latter of
-whom has perhaps painted a greater number than any other of the old
-masters) are far more deficient in form, character, and expression, than
-is generally supposed, or than will be easily believed, by those who
-have not actually compared them with the Lions, Leopards, and Tigers of
-Nature. They have been taken too much on the credit which attaches to
-the great names of their authors.—Nor is this intended to impugn the
-merits, as historical or poetical painters, of those distinguished
-Artists, but simply as an assertion of truth. It is possible, that as a
-painter of allegory, RUBENS might consider that strong infusion of
-_human_ form, character, and expression, by which his Lions, for
-example, are distinguished, as necessary, or conducive, to his
-allegorical purposes; or, it is possible that his knowledge of this
-animal may not have been thoroughly well-grounded, and that he may have
-laboured under early prejudice of mind, or of vision, in this part of
-his education as a Painter, and may not have seen Lions as they really
-are. This is what the writer is most inclined to believe, (though not to
-insist); for even in treating the subject of Daniel in the den of
-Lions—the scene of which, by the way, he has not represented as a royal
-menagerie, but as a wild, rocky cavern—his animals partake of the
-artificial character of which we cannot bring ourselves to approve.
-
-Of this fact, however, we purpose to exhibit proof with our assertion.
-Improved versions, to the best abilities of our Artists, of some of
-these Lions of RUBENS and the Assyrian king, will here be introduced,
-which the reader, who pleases, may compare with the originals. Our
-second, third, and fourth Plates are of the number.
-
-The Lions of RUBENS are _humanized_. We do not intend to discuss at
-length whether the ideality of allegorical painting required this: we
-only state the fact: yet the opinions which we felt at liberty to form
-on the subject, we feel at liberty to utter. So much in apology for
-using the licence of asserting that the heads of many of the Lions of
-RUBENS rather resemble those of frowning old gentlemen decorated with
-Ramillies wigs; as if Nature’s journeymen had made _manes_, and not made
-them well. There is a profusion of flowing and curling hair, which seems
-rather to solicit the unguents of the perfumer, than to have endured the
-torrid heats of the desert, or the rough storms of the forest. The shag
-of a Lion’s mane is a very different sort of thing.
-
-However such dressed Lions may be thought to accord with Allegory, they
-are demonstrably at variance with Nature. To be sure, what might become
-a Lion in the procession of the Cardinal Virtues, might be rather
-unsuitable in his den, or within the precincts of those wild haunts,
-where he is accustomed to roam in his natural state. We have often read
-of the fabled Men-bulls, or (Minotaurs,) and we find such on the coinage
-of Crete. These allegorical creatures of RUBENS, which, alas! have
-sometimes been _quoted_ by Artists without half his genius, and placed
-in savage conflicts, or beside their Britannias—are a species of
-Men-lions. Placed among the Sabæan sculptures, they might pass for
-incarnations of Sol in Leo; but would very ill pass for Leo alone.
-
-Among the observers of this poetic improvement, or this natural and
-unpoetical deficiency, on the part of RUBENS, TITIAN, JULIO ROMANO, and
-other painters, both ancient and modern; and of the consequent
-_desideratum_ on the part of the public, of a cabinet or library
-collection of the nobler wild animals in a state of Nature, so as to
-answer the purposes of reference, while they conduced to the pleasures
-of Taste, were Mr. EDGAR SPILSBURY and Mr. THOMAS LANDSEER. Whether or
-not the public “looked up to them for light” on that subject, (to use
-the language of STERNE,) they thought the Public “deserved it;” and they
-therefore, as the best practical means of eliciting that light, first
-copied the general forms and attitudes of most of the wild animals that
-appear in this book, from the old masters—generally speaking, from works
-that are well known—and then, went to Nature and corrected the details.
-They carried with them what, in those ancient masters, was meritorious
-in composition, attitude and chiaroscuro, and brought away, to the best
-of their ability—superadding it to, and blending it with, the
-above—accuracy of detail.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 2
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LEOPARD after REYDINGER.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Every artist does best, that which he is best qualified and best
-disposed to do. In completing the number of plates that has been found
-necessary for the Work, Mr. EDWIN LANDSEER has chosen to proceed toward
-the same purpose, upon a different principle. He has gone, without any
-introductory medium, directly to the living animals, and has exhibited
-the savage manners and habits of these quadrupeds, according to his own
-ideas and observations.
-
-On the distinction between CHARACTER and EXPRESSION, we shall now
-deliver our opinion. By the _Character_ of an animal, we mean those
-permanencies of his look and features which he always offers to view
-when in a placid, or unimpassioned state: by his _Expression_, the
-variations of muscular action superinduced on character, to which he is
-liable, as the storms of passion sweep by, and his mind becomes agitated
-by external circumstances acting on the ardours of his instinct.
-
-The former, seems to hold its court in the solid and massy parts: the
-latter, agitates, ofttimes rebelliously, the nerves and muscles.
-Character is ever present, both in the animal countenance, and in the
-“human face divine.” The most violent expression does not proscribe, or
-obliterate, character. Individuality consists of it, as far as concerns
-external appearance; and it forms the system of vowels of the language
-of Nature, without which no Expression could be.
-
-Whoever regards the faces of a flock of Sheep, will see in them an
-infinite variety of Character, with very little Expression, and that
-little without diversity: and if we descend a step lower in the scale of
-being, and contemplate the finny tribe, where Character is not wanting,
-we find no Expression at all. Even Trees and inanimate objects, possess
-Character. We recollect a poetical friend of ours, now in Italy, saying
-that every tree and every rock had a _face_—but of this we are not so
-certain; though very certain, that there is enough of _Character_ in
-rocks and trees, to make a poet think so.
-
-_Character_ and _Expression_, in the carnivorous class of animals, to
-which we here solicit attention, are always co-existent—their
-proportions varying with the existing occasions—in pictorial exhibitions
-of such subjects.
-
-
- No. II.
-
-There is much Character, and little Expression, in the reposing Leopard
-with his sheathed claws, which is shewn in the present engraving, copied
-by Mr. SPILSBURY from RIDINGER, and corrected from Nature. RIDINGER was
-an artist of great power, who studied wild animals in their sequestered
-haunts, as is shewn in his grand forest back-grounds; and who, generally
-speaking, left little or no room for others to improve, except on some
-few of his inferior works. The present is an interesting and beautiful
-animal, yet there is a latent capability of mischief characterised in
-his countenance, and we might ask, in the language of Job, “Who shall
-dare to rouse him up?”
-
-
- No. III.
-
-TWO COUCHANT LIONS, AFTER RUBENS, taken from his celebrated picture
-before alluded to, of the Prophet Daniel incarcerated in the den. The
-Lions are here supposed to be miraculously held in a state of
-tranquillity. Here, too, is not much Expression, but an extraordinary
-grandeur of Character, suited to the greatness of an occasion where the
-Deity himself especially interferes to seal up the voracious energies of
-the most terrible of his creatures, in calm submission. There is a
-character of royal dignity mingled with this submission, which is very
-impressive, and even sublime.
-
-The writer esteems this to be a successful restoration of the Nature
-that was wanting in the prints of this subject, (which has often been
-engraved by PICART and others,) after RUBENS. The original picture it
-has been our ill-fortune never to have seen. The shaggy manes, and the
-latent terror that sits gloomily enthroned in the open eyes of the
-superior Lion—suited to the darkness of the den, and the nature of this
-animal’s sense of vision,—are as well thought of, as they are executed;
-and are varied with much address from the closed eyes of the couching
-Lion beyond, of which also the character is most happily marked. A
-powerful and divine spell possesses them both.
-
-
- No. IV.
-
-THE TIGER WHICH MARCHES IN OUR PROCESSION, without an object before him
-to call forth emotion, possesses a calm character, combined with the
-resistless strength of that dreadful quadruped; whose very tranquillity,
-in his leisure sauntering, when no excitement is acting on his nerves,
-has an appalling effect.—His brow is clouded, though his claws are
-sheathed. There is a possibility of a dreadful storm which may not be
-far distant, and that is enough to stamp the Tiger’s character. None
-shall dare to arouse his energies, nor to encounter them when aroused.
-
-
- No. V.
-
-THIS GROUP OF PLAYFUL LEOPARDS, AFTER RUBENS, must be supposed to belong
-to the jocund train of Bacchus, since they are luxuriating at their
-ease, among grapes and vine branches. These Leopards are doubtless
-intended to have a degree of playful expression—induced perhaps by the
-exhilarating juice of the grape: and we should “guess” (as _Jonathan_
-says) that this group was studied from a litter of half-grown kittens.
-Few, however, except the sailors who were accustomed to gambol with the
-Tiger-cub on board the Pitt East-Indiaman, would like to venture to
-frolic _with_ them.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 3
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LIONS after RUBENS.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 4
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-TIGER after NATURE.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 5
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LEOPARDS after RUBENS.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 6
-
-_E. Landseer del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-CONTENDING GROUP after NATURE.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
- No. VI.
-
-In this GROUP by MR. EDWIN LANDSEER there is much of violent animal
-_Expression_, and Character fades before it, or rather, is absorbed in
-it. It tells a story of the past as well as the present, and is pregnant
-with a catastrophe not difficult to anticipate from the actions and
-expressions of the parties engaged. A FAWN has been seized by a LEOPARD,
-who has been despoiled of his prey by a more powerful TIGER. The Tiger
-in his turn becomes the victim of an enraged LION.
-
-The expression of the wounded Leopard is that of painful suffering
-mingled with dread. Together, they amount to agony. He shrieks while he
-submits. The Tiger is still enraged and resisting, though astounded with
-the power and suddenness of the Lion’s attack. He is losing his energy
-of resistance, and is beginning to feel that all resistance is vain. He
-roars with anguish; while his expression is that of terror, and
-indignation not yet subdued.
-
-The Lion, who has just made his thundering spring, appears conscious of
-having fatally seized his adversary, and luxuriates fearlessly in his
-victory; and with a powerful and just expression of carnivorous
-enjoyment.—Meanwhile the characters of the animals, severally, are
-faithfully and specifically represented.
-
-Although our main purpose be to exhibit rather a pictorial than a
-physiological view of the subject: having descanted on the word
-Character, we shall probably be expected to add, at least a word or two,
-on the leading characteristics of the carnivorous class of quadrupeds.
-
-The generic characters of the Feline, or Cat, kind, are easily
-enumerated in the concise language of the naturalists. Their heads are
-round; their visages short: they have six cutting teeth, and two canine,
-in either jaw: their tongues are aculeated, the prickles inclining
-backward; their claws sharp, hooked, and retractile; their ears small
-and acuminated; they have five toes on each of the fore-feet, and four
-only on those behind.
-
-Of this genera of Cats, we here exhibit the four principal species,
-Lions, Tigers, Leopards, and Panthers, of which the Lion is justly
-placed at the head—at least, the unanimous voice of ages has pronounced
-him to be the king of beasts, and we have enthroned him accordingly in
-our Title-page, (No. I.) They form a tribe that is especially and
-properly _Carnivorous_, being the only class of quadrupeds that are
-exclusively _flesh-eaters_. Their jaws are very completely armed for
-this purpose; their canine teeth being very long and angular, with the
-edges of the angles turned toward the inside of their mouths; so that
-when the animal has caused them to meet, or cross each other in the
-flesh of its prey, these formidable teeth will cut or tear a way
-through, by drawing them back without opening his mouth.
-
-Their claws, and the formation of their feet, too, are eminently
-conducive to their predacious and carnivorous habits. They walk on their
-toes: yet not so much from that habitual stealthiness of pace, by which
-they advance unperceived till within a spring of their prey; as because
-it is also the means of that celerity of motion which is necessary to
-the very existence of animals that can feed only on flesh.
-
-Their claws are exceedingly powerful; and they are enabled to draw them
-up into sheaths between their toes, so as to prevent their points from
-touching the ground; whence they are called retractile; and those claws
-are, in consequence, always kept sharp, unworn, and ready for active
-service.
-
-The eyes of the Feline tribe—of every face in nature a striking and
-important feature—vary in the different species, and are capable of much
-alteration in the same animal; as instinctive impulse, or internal
-emotion, changes the expression of his countenance; and also from the
-degrees of light which act upon their pupils. Of Lions the pupils of the
-eyes are circular, and not of a yellow colour, as has been stated in the
-most diffuse modern dissertations on the Carnivora, but black. It is the
-iris of the Lion’s eye that is yellow. They appear to be best suited to
-nocturnal, or twilight, vision; and hence the Lion rarely hunts his prey
-while the sun is above the horizon—perhaps never, but when pressed by
-hunger in an extraordinary degree. The Tiger, on the contrary, will seek
-his prey by day as well as by night; and during twilight the colour of
-his eyes is that of a blue-green flame. If a stranger passes near a
-Tiger in a menagerie, the colour of the animal’s eyes will sometimes
-alter suddenly, from yellow-green to blue-green; not from any alteration
-in the degree of light acting upon them, but from mental excitement, and
-from a certain natural facility of expansion and contraction of the
-eye-pupils.
-
-Hence a characteristic difference between the Lion and the Tiger. The
-habits of the latter are diurnal, and he disregards night-fires: the
-Lion, on the contrary, whose eyes are not calculated for the glare of
-day, cannot bear to encounter fire-light at night. Yet these physical
-conformations are sometimes overcome by the rage of hunger; and hence,
-in MR. EDWIN LANDSEER’S contending group, the Lion is represented as
-attacking the Tiger although it be day.
-
-MR. BELL treats learnedly, and we believe with much originality, of the
-facial-muscles of this class of quadrupeds, in his “Anatomy of
-Expression.”—We shall offer a few extracts, by which the reader will
-perceive how limited are their powers of expression of countenance, when
-compared with those of human nature, notwithstanding their superiority
-over all other quadrupeds.
-
-“The violent passions mark themselves so distinctly on the countenances
-both of men and of animals, that we are apt in the first instance to
-consider the movements by which they are indicated, as certain signs or
-characters provided by Nature, for the express purpose of intimating the
-internal emotion; and to suppose that they are interpreted by the
-observer in consequence of a peculiar and instinctive faculty. This view
-of things, however, so natural at first sight, is not altogether
-satisfactory to philosophy; and a more jealous observation of the facts,
-seems to suggest an opposite theory, in which instinctive agency is
-rejected, and the appearances are explained from a consideration of the
-necessities and voluntary exertions of the animal. With regard to the
-observer, it has been asserted, that it is by experience alone that he
-distinguishes the signs of the passions; that we learn, while infants,
-to consider smiles as expressions of kindness, because they are
-accompanied by acts of beneficence and by endearments; and frowns as the
-contrary, because we find them followed by blows; that the expression of
-anger in a brute, is only that which has been observed to precede his
-biting; and that of fondness, his fawning and licking of the hand. With
-regard to the creature itself, it is said, what has been called the
-external signs of passion, are merely the concomitants of those
-voluntary movements, which the passions or habits suggest; that the
-glare of the Lion’s eye, for example, is the consequence of a voluntary
-exertion to see his prey more clearly—his grin, or snarl, the natural
-motion of uncasing his fangs before he uses them. This, however, is not
-quite true of all animals and of all expression of passion.”
-
-“Attending merely to the evidence furnished by anatomical investigation,
-all that I shall venture to affirm is this: that a remarkable difference
-is to be found between the anatomy and range of expression, in man and
-in animals: that in the former there seems to be a systematic provision
-for that mode of communication and that natural language, which is to be
-read in the changes of the countenance: that there is no emotion in the
-mind of man which has not its appropriate signs; and that there are even
-muscles in the human face to which no other use can be assigned than to
-serve as the organs of this language: that, on the other hand, there is
-in the lower animals no range of expression which is not fairly
-referable as a mere accessary to the voluntary or needful actions of the
-animal; and that this accessary expression does not appear to be in any
-degree commensurate to the variety and extent of the animal’s passions.”
-
-“There appears to me (continues MR. BELL) to be no expression in the
-face of any animal lower in the scale of being than quadrupeds; and in
-them the strongest and most marked expression is that of rage; the
-object of which is opposition, resistance, and defence. But on
-examination it will be found (consistently with the position, that this
-is merely an accessary of the motions natural to the accomplishment of
-the object which the animal has in view) that the strength of the
-expression is in exact proportion to the strength of the principal
-action in the creature when thus excited.
-
-“The gramnivorous animals, which seek their subsistence, not by preying
-upon others, nor by the ferocity, contest, and victory which supply the
-carnivorous with food, have in their features no strong expression of
-rage. Their expression is chiefly confined indeed to the effect produced
-on the general system. Thus the inflamed eye and the breathing nostrils
-of the Bull, are induced only by the general excitement. His only proper
-expression of rage, is in the position of the head, with the horns
-turned obliquely to the ground, ready to strike: and indeed it may be
-observed in general that animals which strike with the horns, shew
-little indication of fear or rage, except in the position of the head.
-In all gramnivorous animals, the skin of the head is closely attached to
-the skull, and capable only of very limited motion: the eye is almost
-uniformly mild, and the lips unmoved by passion.
-
-“It is in carnivorous animals, with whose habits and manner of life,
-ferocity is instinctively connected, as the great means of their
-subsistence, that rage is distinguished by the most remarkable strength
-of expression. The eye-ball is terrible, and the retraction of the flesh
-of the lips indicates the most savage fury. But the first, is merely the
-exerted attention of the animal; and the other a preparatory exposure of
-the canine teeth. The great animals of prey—the Lion and the Tiger—are
-quite incapable of any other expression of feature, than this particular
-display of ferociousness. When they fawn upon their keeper, there is no
-motion in their features that indicates affection.”
-
-In this assertion, that the countenances of the great animals of prey
-are incapable of any other than ferocious expression, we do not quite
-coincide with our learned physiologist. When they fawn upon their
-keeper, we think that indications of affection are exhibited; and find
-ourselves ready to ask what else than kindly expression is that “licking
-of the hand” which our author has before mentioned. If, however, we
-should grant that they may not be capable of affectionate expression
-toward their keeper, we can scarcely doubt that—toward their young—if we
-could observe them in their wild state, and in their moments of playful
-intercourse and enjoyment among each other—they are: at least, we think
-there are motions in their features that indicate affection, as well as
-fear, enquiry, surprise, gratitude, pleasurable wantonness, and some
-other sentiments, or emotions. This is our conviction: at the same time,
-we perceive that the range of their ferocious expression far exceeds the
-savage circle of their domestic charities. Are not even the least of
-these observable in the habits and manners of the domestic Cat, who
-belongs to the Tiger genera? But we have even seen a Tiger in his den,
-who looked good-natured enough to be stroked and patted: and of the
-Lion, of whom MR. GRIFFITH relates the following anecdote, what can be
-said or thought?
-
-“Hearing some noise under his cage, the Lion passed his paw between the
-bars, and actually hauled up his keeper who was cleaning beneath; but as
-soon as he perceived that he had thus ill used his master, he instantly
-lay down upon his back in an attitude of complete submission.”
-
-Or what can be said of the circumstance mentioned by SENECA (of which he
-was personally witness), of a Lion, to whom a man, who had formerly been
-his keeper, was exposed for destruction in the amphitheatre at Rome; and
-who was not only instantly recognised, but defended and protected by the
-grateful beast?—Or of the story related by DR. SOUTHEY, of the Lion who
-had broken loose, submitting to the Cid, and allowing himself to be led
-back peaceably to his place of confinement?
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 7
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LION & SNAKE after NATURE.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Could any painter of talent proceed to represent either of these
-_facts_, without finding in the countenance of the Lion, the muscles and
-the means of expressing a corresponding gentleness, or generosity, of
-feeling?
-
-What could be said or thought of these things? Why it may be said, and
-will be thought, by all those who take both sides of the argument fairly
-into the question—that MR. BELL has discovered and declared, that the
-muscles of affection, do not exist in the carnivora. Ergo, that the
-sentiment which we so translate or acknowledge—the appearances (that is)
-with which we may find ourselves affected—can only be expression of a
-negative kind; resulting from the relaxation of those muscles whose
-tension is necessary to the purposes, or the expression, of ferocity:
-that “the force of Nature can no further go;” and that the painter—the
-supposed painter, of such subjects, who is appealed to above—in order to
-be in any degree successful, must “make a third, by joining the former
-two”—that is to say, by mingling a portion of human nature with that of
-the animal: which brings us round to the practice and the probable
-theory of RUBENS; of which it affords more justification, and of a
-higher kind, than superficial reasoners can be aware of.
-
-But, when muscles of affection are mentioned, do we talk of a positive
-and acknowledged certainty; or only of a construction that has been put
-upon certain muscles of the face, by those who have an hypothesis to
-maintain, or who can trace affectionate expression in no other? And, are
-we thence to infer the exhaustion of the subject, and non-entity of the
-expression?
-
-
- No. VII.
-
-MR. SPILSBURY’S LION, who has turned round his head to look at a Snake,
-affords a delineated example in point. Here is no more, we think, than
-the latent capability of ferocity: just so much as cannot be separated
-from the native character of this noble quadruped.—The eye-ball is here,
-not “terrible;” nor is “the most savage fury” indicated by the
-retraction of the lips, although the lower canine teeth are exposed.
-Here is a general sense of dignity; but the leading, present expression
-of the moment, (as it strikes us,) is that of curiosity, or excited
-attention; mingled with some degree of surprise that a contemptible
-little Snake should presume to roll his puny volumes in the royal
-presence. It would appear that the Lion has heard something hiss, and
-cares a little, to know what it may be.
-
-Will it be further objected that this is _Art_?—To be sure it is. But we
-think that such Lion-looks are to be seen in Nature; and that such were
-seen, when the Dog which appealed to, and obtained, the _royal_ pity,
-was first thrown into the Lion’s den at the Tower. We believe that this
-representation of the Lion and Snake is not taken from any old master,
-but is MR. SPILSBURY’S own design.
-
-
- No. VIII.
-
-Neither is there any expression of ferocity, but of home comfort, in
-these two maneless Lions—or LION and LIONESS of SENEGAL. That which is
-asleep, however, rather illustrates our definition of _Character_, and
-is so far out of the question. The Lioness—who is awake, is a kind of
-_Belle-Sauvage_. Entirely without ferocity, she has some little
-expression of attention gently aroused by some slight cause—less
-important, we should think than the distant cry of a Chacal—a noise in
-the den, perhaps, not loud enough to make it worth while to wake her
-companion in order to see what’s the matter. But her expression of
-countenance, is almost as mild as that of a kitten in a chimney
-corner.—In fact, they seem—notwithstanding their Herculean strength—a
-kind of hearth-rug Lions.[1]
-
-Footnote 1:
-
- This was written before the beautiful hearth-rug Lion introduced to us
- by Mr. Crosse of Leeds, and which is equal to the finest painting.
-
-After venturing to express this slight difference of opinion (if it
-amount to so much) with our distinguished anatomist of Expression, we
-return, with becoming respect, to his valuable Treatise: though as we do
-not propose to exhibit, like him, an anatomical and comparative view of
-the Carnivorous and Gramnivorous genera, we shall confine ourselves to a
-short extract or two, relating to the Carnivora alone—
-
-“It is of man alone that we can with strict propriety say the
-countenance is an index of the mind, having expression corresponding
-with each emotion of the soul. Other animals have no expression but that
-which arises by mere accident, the concomitant of the emotions necessary
-to the accomplishment of the object of the passions.”—
-
-“I have to remark, as relative to painting, (my original subject of
-enquiry) that this remarkable difference between the expression in man,
-and animals, naturally leads us to investigate what are the
-peculiarities of mere animal expression.
-
-“In order to see distinctly what the peculiarities of mere animal
-expression are, it seems proper to reduce the muscles of expression in
-animals, to their proper classes. These muscles, as they appear in the
-several quadrupeds, may be distinguished into—1. Those which raise the
-lips from the teeth: 2. Those which surround the eye-lids: and 3. Those
-which move the nostrils.”
-
-He next proceeds to state that “in the Carnivorous animal, the muscles
-of the lip are so directed as to raise the lip from the canine
-teeth;”—and these he distinguishes by the name of “_Ringentes_, or
-snarling muscles.”
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 8
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-SENEGAL LION & LIONESS after REYDINGER.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 9
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LION & TIGER after STUBBS.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-The snarling muscles take their origin from the margin of the orbit of
-the eye, and from the upper jaw, and are inserted into that part of the
-upper lip from which the whiskers grow, and which is opposite to the
-canine teeth; and although they are assisted in this office by other
-muscles, (the masticating and zygomatic muscles,) I have ventured to
-distinguish them particularly as the muscles of snarling. This action of
-snarling is quite peculiar to the ferocious and carnivorous animals.
-
-“2. Muscles which surround the eye-lid. In man the upper eye-lid is
-raised by a muscle coming from the bottom of the orbit. But, besides
-this muscle, animals of prey in whom there is that peculiar and
-ferocious splendour of the eye, which we distinguish in the Tiger, for
-example, or the Lion—have three muscles infixed in the eye-lids, which
-drawing the eye-lids backward upon the peculiarly prominent eye-ball,
-produce the fixed straining of the eye, and by stretching the coats,
-give a greater brilliancy to the reflection. These muscles may be
-classed under the term _Scintillantes_.
-
-“3. The muscles of the nostril are not less distinct and peculiar, in
-different classes of animals, than those of the eyes and lips. In the
-Carnivorous animals, the nose is comparatively insignificant, provision
-being made in the open mouth for any occasional increase of respiration
-above the uniform play of the lungs.”
-
-Taking respectful, friendly, and reluctant leave of MR. BELL, we trust
-that conformity will be found between these pictorial remarks and
-anatomical elucidations of his, and our engraved representations of the
-Carnivora.
-
-
- No. IX.
-
-The interior of a rocky den, where the LION dares to intrude on the
-retired repose of a ROYAL TIGER, copied by MR. SPILSBURY from the
-Sketch-book of STUBBS. On the part of the Tiger, there is expressed a
-certain half frantic suspension of purpose. His look is fierce, though
-apprehensive, and as if his mind was not made up whether to become the
-assailant, or stand on the defensive. He is evidently taken by surprise;
-and if he does not fear, he is thoroughly conscious (as DR. JOHNSON
-said, when he was to meet LORD THURLOW) that “there is something to
-_encounter_:” while the Lion, feeling also that he has met with his
-match, is arousing his terrible energies. The heroes are threatening:
-the storm has gathered: and is about to burst in fury.
-
-With regard to the “ferocious splendour of their eyes,” and the exposure
-of their canine teeth by means of the _Ringentes_, the reader will find
-here a strict accordance with MR. BELL’S theory.
-
-
- No. X.
-
-The TIGRESS of BENGAL, which has been designed, as well as etched, by
-MR. THOMAS LANDSEER, from that at the Exeter ’Change Menagerie, affords
-also a pertinent illustration of the principles which MR. BELL had
-derived from combining study with dissection: theory with practice. The
-“three muscles infixed in the eye-lids, which, drawing the eye-lids
-backward upon the peculiarly prominent eye-ball, produce the fixed
-straining of the eye, and by stretching the coats, give a greater
-brilliancy to the reflection,” are here brought into action by a violent
-and unexpected outrage done to the maternal feelings. Here too is
-exemplified the origin, insertion, and physical use, of those snarling
-muscles, which are so properly named and defined by our learned
-anatomist. We cannot but wish, however, that he had written also of
-those of the lower jaw, which so powerfully conduce to this snarling and
-dreadful expression.
-
-The mother has arrived at a fortunate conjuncture for her cubs, which
-lie sleeping below, in a small den or dark recess of the bank, whither a
-Serpent has stolen. Twisted among the jungle, which affords an
-advantageous post both of attack and defence for the Serpent—the Tigress
-has reason to dread an enemy so powerful and insidious; and, as in the
-preceding Engraving, both parties are prepared for the encounter, and
-fully aware of the importance of a first blow.
-
-
- No. XI.
-
-THESE RAMPANT LIONS, bear the name of RUBENS as their author. SIR JOHN
-SEBRIGHT, we believe, has the original picture. It would neither
-deteriorate from its intrinsic merit as a work of art, nor from its
-nominal value (we suspect), should it turn out to be from the pencil of
-SNYDERS; or a performance of RUBENS and SNYDERS in conjunction. They not
-unfrequently painted on the same canvas; but the high reputation and
-rank of RUBENS, has in some measure absorbed that of his coadjutor,
-except among first-rate connoisseurs—whereas, in all that relates to the
-details of Nature, SNYDERS was the superior painter of _animals_: and
-our reasons for thinking that he had at least a hand in this picture of
-the rampant Lions, are, 1st, The superior attention which is here paid
-to the details of Nature. 2ndly, That the action of the nearest of the
-two Lions, is precisely that of the same animal, in SNYDERS’ very
-capital picture from the fable of the Lion liberated by the Mouse, now
-in the Cabinet of THOMAS FRANKLIN, Esq. 3rdly, That the study in oil of
-a dead Lion, in the collection of G. WATSON TAYLOR, Esq. also believed
-to be from the hand of SNYDERS, bears internal evidence of being
-painted, not only from Nature, but from the very same individual Lion,
-with the above. They are all portraits of the same animal. It appears as
-if SNYDERS, having obtained possession of a dead Lion, after making the
-study now belonging to MR. TAYLOR, had put him in this rampant attitude,
-and painted from him as long as he lasted. But perhaps RUBENS and
-SNYDERS did this in concert: for on the other hand may be recollected a
-masterly sketch in oil of the heads only of these rampant Lions, which
-was exhibited at the British Gallery two seasons ago, bearing the _name_
-of RUBENS. If this name was written by RUBENS himself, the probability
-is as above stated, that both artists painted at the same time from the
-same model. On this point we do but sum up such evidence as is before
-us, leaving the verdict to the reader.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 10
-
-_Tho^s. Landseer del^t. et sculp^t._
-
-TIGRESS after NATURE.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 11
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LIONS after RUBENS.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-We believe that this subject also, has passed through the medium of an
-Etching by BLOTELING, for it differs in some minor respects from the
-picture in the gallery of SIR JOHN SEBRIGHT. It however affords further
-illustration of the theory of expression laid down by MR. BELL, while it
-embodies the Scriptural idea of a “ramping and roaring Lion seeking whom
-he may devour.”
-
-We have mentioned above, our having been disposed, on a certain occasion
-of visiting a public menagerie, to pat and stroke a Royal Tiger as he
-lay in his den with his nose toward the spectator, and whose looks,
-though certainly far from angelic, we could almost have called amiable:
-yet this is very far from being the character of the Tiger. To stroke,
-or pat, or touch them in any way, however, no person should ever
-venture, except their keepers; even the tame Tigers, that are sometimes
-brought up almost without animal food by the mendicant priests of
-Hindostan, are strictly prohibited from being touched—“under the utmost
-rigours of religious anathema,” says COL. WILLIAMSON, who relates a
-circumstance of his having visited a Faukeer who kept a Tiger of this
-kind in the wilds of Colgong.
-
-
- No. XII.
-
-The amiable-looking Tiger of whom we have spoken, lay something in the
-attitude and manner of the principal PANTHER, in the present picturesque
-group which MR. SPILSBURY copied from the Sketch-book of that admirable
-painter and anatomist of animals, STUBBS.
-
-Perhaps this sentiment of ours, may be ascribed—in part at least—to the
-undulations of form, glossiness of surface, and brilliancy of colours,
-of these interesting creatures, reviving the early mental impressions
-which we remember to have received at the sight of shining and speckled
-shells, butterflies’ wings, and other objects of pure beauty; and in
-part to our having associated ideas of innocence and domesticated habits
-and comfort, with the “sympathetic mirth” (as GOLDSMITH’S phrase is) of
-sportive kittens.
-
-It may not be unworthy of our best philosophy to pause here, and observe
-how Nature contrives to mingle, and seems to insist on mingling,
-sentiments and mental impressions, which analysing man is so fond of
-reducing to first elements—as he calls them. Surely there is, about
-these Carnivorous and terrible creatures, a saving grace—a beauty in
-their dreadfulness, which is exceedingly interesting, although it
-co-exist with cruelty: for if they are cruel, their cruelty is
-involuntary, and not implacable; and therefore, if not pardonable, not
-hateful—while the external beauty which they possess, is of a positive
-nature.
-
-Reverting here to our own scholastic distinction, we think that Nature
-has, in the instance of this species of quadrupeds, mingled with similar
-success, energy of character, with a degree of mildness of expression.
-The natural character of the Panther is fearfully ferocious, yet a
-superinduced kindly expression may be seen in this group from the pencil
-of STUBBS—a sworn disciple of Nature—which may shew that in their home
-retiredness, they have not been left destitute of the means of letting
-each other see that they are sociable, friendly, and not entirely
-without the means of expressing the gentler emotions. Men are perhaps
-too exclusively disposed to look at the objects around them, as those
-objects immediately concern themselves: MR. STUBBS, in composing this
-capital group, took a more extensive and genuine view of things; and
-notwithstanding the Panther is larger and more formidable than the
-Leopard (from which quadruped he is not always easily distinguishable),
-has depicted them as scarcely less mild and gentle than the domestic
-Cat.
-
-The evidence of facts, however, when set in apposition, affords, in all
-probability, the most efficacious and convincing means of manifesting
-such principles as we are here submitting, while they exhibit the
-_varieties_ of animal expression to the best advantage; and we therefore
-introduce another GROUP of PANTHERS, from the same Sketch-book, by
-STUBBS, more malignant in their aspects.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 12
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-PANTHERS after STUBBS.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 13
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-PANTHERS after STUBBS.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
- No. XIII.
-
-This is what one might call a domestic, or family, group; but they seem
-here to be meditating prey, and by no means so good-humoured as in the
-former instance, where they might be fancied to be quietly enjoying
-themselves after a sufficient repast. The two groups, when viewed
-together, seem very much to assist our perceptions of the capability of
-this animal of gentle, as well as of savage, expression.—They are
-contrasted, indeed, though without the direct opposition of violent
-brutal action, to calm repose: the eye being the chief seat of the
-difference. But neither the gentle, nor the more ferocious and
-malignant-looking, Panthers, or Tigers, will bear any comparison for
-commanding majesty of appearance with the regal Lion, whether in a calm
-or an excited state—as the vignette of our title-page is ready to bear
-witness.
-
-There is good chiaroscuro in both of the above groups; and the scene of
-rocky wildness in which the latter are placed, as well as the rich
-colouring of the fur of the animals, are ably indicated.
-
-The reader may perhaps not be displeased to attend here for a moment, to
-a short epitome of what the Naturalists have said concerning the
-distinctive marks of this interesting quadruped, the Panther: nor to be
-informed or reminded of the strong resemblance which he bears to the
-Leopard.
-
-DR. SHAW observes that LINNÆUS himself has confounded the Panther with
-the Leopard; but adds, that “a true distinctive mark between them, is by
-no means easy to communicate either by description or even by figure.”
-He thinks that the Leopard is the smaller of the two species of animals,
-and its colour a paler yellow: and MR. GRIFFITH, in his “Carnivora,”
-says, “A very fine animal is now exhibiting at Exeter ’Change under the
-name of Leopard, which is much larger as well as brighter than any other
-Leopard in that Menagerie, and should, therefore, according to SHAW,
-seem to be the Panther. But I am informed that the animal in question
-was taken in India, and that all those which come from Asia, are much
-brighter in colour than those from Africa, which is confirmed by
-inspection of the African specimens there; and that the females have
-more white about them than the other sex: and MR. CROSS, who has had
-opportunities of inspecting probably some hundreds of specimens, insists
-that he has never observed any specific difference between those brought
-from Asia and Africa, among themselves, except that the Asiatic are
-generally larger and brighter.”
-
-LICHTENSTEIN, in a note communicated to MAJOR SMITH, describes the
-Panther as resembling the Jaguar, in having the same number of rows of
-spots, but different in having no full spots, on the dorsal line. If
-this be correct, then is the existence of the Panther established as
-being distinct from the Leopard: but I do not find that full spots on
-the dorsal line always make a specific difference of the Jaguar. When,
-therefore, it is said, that the Panther much resembles the Jaguar, it is
-always strongly to be suspected that the type whence the observations
-are taken is an American animal. If the contrary be clearly established,
-and the animal be found to have large round or oval open marks of black,
-with a central spot on the sides and back, and a tail longer than from
-its insertion to the ground, it may be concluded that it is the real
-Panther.
-
-Lastly, that indefatigable investigator, CUVIER, says he was long in
-doubt whether the Panther and Leopard were distinct: but a comparison of
-a great number of skins, as well as observations on the numerous animals
-sent to the French Museum, have satisfied him that they are different;
-and he accordingly describes the Panther as having six or seven rows of
-rose-like spots in transverse lines, the tail longer and the head larger
-than the Jaguar, and the ground-colour of the fur paler. The Leopard he
-describes as a little less than the Panther, though with the same
-proportions; but the spots, as much more numerous, forming ten
-transverse lines.
-
-The opinion of CUVIER is certainly deserving of the greatest attention;
-but it may be observed that his enumeration of the six or seven rows of
-spots in the Panther, and of ten in the Leopard, is not so certainly
-intelligible as might be desired, when it is considered that the spots
-or marks in question have really little or no parallelism.
-Notwithstanding, therefore, this respectable authority, it seems very
-probable that the Panther and Leopard are one and the same species,
-which branches into two varieties, the Asiatic and the African; the
-former of which is brighter in colour, and probably something larger
-than the latter; and that the females of both are paler and less than
-the other sex. CICERO, in his letters to ATTICUS, speaks of the Panther
-of Africa, and the Asiatic Panther; as if they were different.
-
-The ancient naturalists were not a whit more successful in
-distinguishing these two quadrupeds, than the moderns, notwithstanding
-the opportunities which they possessed of inspecting so many. MR.
-GRIFFITH comments on SHAW, LICHTENSTEIN, and CUVIER; so did CICERO and
-PLINY, on ARISTOTLE. Hence their _Panthera_, _Pardus_, and the
-_Leopardus_ of the later ages of Rome (the last of which plainly
-indicates their supposition that a Lion or Lioness had been concerned in
-the generation of this spotted animal.)
-
-It is surprising to reflect on the great number of Panthers, which in
-those later ages of Rome, were brought from the deserts of Africa for
-their public shows. SCAURUS exhibited an hundred and fifty of them at
-one time; POMPEY, four hundred and ten; and AUGUSTUS, four hundred and
-twenty! They probably thinned the province of Mauritania almost to
-extirpation; which may account for the superior abundance of these
-quadrupeds, as well as of Lions, at present, in Guinea, and the more
-southern parts of Africa.
-
-It would appear, that after all that has been accomplished by the spot
-and row-counting philosophers, the distinction between Panthers and
-Leopards is by no means made out; and we take it, that whenever Nature
-means to mark a distinction of this sort, she always does it with a
-firmer hand, and more decisive line.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 14
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LEOPARD & PANTHER after STUBBS.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
- No. XIV.
-
-STUBBS, who had most likely paid sufficient attention to what the
-naturalists had previously said on the subject—and whom no naturalist
-has exceeded in accuracy of observation—appears to have here sketched
-out the differences, and the resemblances, between these two animals—if
-two they may be termed. It will be observed that the one which we esteem
-to be the LEOPARD—the nearer figure of the two—is somewhat smaller than
-the other, and that the dark spots on her body are not clustered in
-roselets, or oilettes, as they have sometimes been called; while on the
-body of the PANTHER, they are, and indeed everywhere, excepting on his
-head and fore-legs. In short, STUBBS’S delineation agrees best with the
-definition of CUVIER, whose discernment and philosophical tact are by no
-means inferior to that indefatigability for which he is praised by
-GRIFFITH.
-
-Of this Leopard and Panther, the actions and expression (although not
-the character—their noses and mouths being of longer and larger
-proportions) are very much those of the common domestic Cat, when in a
-playful mood. Something there is of burlesque clumsiness in their
-play—resembling HERCULES with the distaff; and something of that assumed
-look which may be observed among Cats while frolicking with their young.
-And these kindly and droll expressions of countenance—these “quips and
-cranks, and wanton wiles,”—are doubtless very well understood among the
-carnivorous comedians, notwithstanding that to some of ourselves, they
-may not appear to amount to much: yet the difference of these our
-engraved heads of a playful Leopard and Panther, and the ocular
-expressions of such animals when raging with hunger, or rendered angry
-by opposition, is immense, and could not fail, if presented together, to
-be strikingly obvious to those who are in the least studious of the
-physiognomical variations of the ferocious tribe. Let the reader compare
-them with the threatening LION and defying TIGER among the rocks, after
-the same master, which we have numbered 19.
-
-Horse-play is proverbially unwelcome: Panther-play must be worse. We
-cannot associate the idea of the endurance of it within reach of man.
-But where Cats and Kittens are occasionally permitted in the parlour,
-there is comparative harmlessness. And who has not witnessed with
-delight, among the rat-catching carnivora in their joyous moments, those
-spontaneous and electrical kindlings of various and rapid fun, which
-must have made HERACLITUS laugh, could he have seen them, and have been
-a lesson to LAVATER.
-
-
- No. XV.
-
-A LION and LIONESS, after RUBENS, where we esteem the execution—more
-especially of the parts which are brought into muscular action, and the
-rich hairy texture of the fur—to be highly creditable to the artists
-concerned. In these respects, it transcends beyond all comparison the
-Etching by PICART of the same subject. We were about to say more of
-these things, and to request attention more particularly to the hinder
-parts of the female, but the knit brow and threatening eye of the Lion
-glares upon us with its high claims, and terrible truth, and we cannot
-but perceive a broad, pervading, and dextrous display of light, shade,
-and expression of texture.—Now, where there is just harmony of parts, it
-is the _whole_ which merits praise; and this praise is of a higher kind
-than could possibly be bestowed with propriety on any part.
-
-The Expression of the Lion is not here so self-possessed and majestic as
-in some of the examples which we have passed. His magnanimity is
-exchanged for that dark treachery and cruel-mindedness, which some
-modern authors ascribe to him. Nor is the Lioness more amiable: both
-seem lurking, malicious, and as if animated by some horrid hope.
-
-RUBENS seems to have let them into his Assyrian den, in order to let the
-world see from how dreadful animals Providence was protecting its
-favoured minister.
-
-
- No. XVI.
-
-RUBENS has here painted one Lion as scowling, another as if in a sort of
-mysterious meditation, and a third yawning with ennui—no doubt to
-diversify a composition wherein he was of necessity obliged to introduce
-a considerable number of animals of the same kind.
-
-The Lion has been, of all quadrupeds whatever, the most idealised by the
-Arts, and the most variously represented. The tide of opinion ran for
-centuries in his favour. Kings took their designations from him: amongst
-whom have been our first RICHARD; but of late years very reputable
-travellers and other authors have appeared, who would bring down the
-poetic generosity, the reputation of which the Lion has so long enjoyed,
-to the plain prose craft and cruelty of the rest of the feline race.
-
-The noble disdain with which a Lioness, though half famished, and “with
-udders all drawn dry,”—scorned to prey on a sleeping man—Must we part
-with the sentiment? Must we also disbelieve the story which has been
-commemorated by a large French engraving, of a Lion gently taking up in
-his mouth a fallen infant, and as gently setting it down again, to the
-infinite delight of its terrified mother?—Such anecdotes have pleased
-and flattered us; but may possibly have gained undeserved credit because
-they pleased, and have pleased because they flattered—_human_ nature.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 15
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LIONS after RUBENS.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 16
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LIONS after RUBENS.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 17
-
-_Edwin Landseer delin^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LIONESS & BITCH from CROSS’S MENAGERIE.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
- No. XVII.
-
-Repeated instances of FRIENDSHIPS BETWEEN THE LION AND THE DOG, have
-occurred at the Menagerie at the Tower, as well as elsewhere in England:
-and we have pleasure in adding a corroborating fact of a novel
-character. Mr. EDWIN LANDSEER made it the subject of a Drawing from
-Nature, and we here present the public with an Engraving after it,
-executed by his brother, and numbered in our collection, 16.
-
-A female whelp was accidentally found, quite young, and even before its
-eye-lids were unclosed, in an African forest not far from the sea shore.
-It was brought on board ship by some sailors, where a smallish black
-bitch, by birth quite an ignoble cur, having recently pupped, the
-experiment was successfully made, of ascertaining whether she would
-suckle the young Lioness, who was christened _Charlotte_.—_Charlotte_
-soon began to thrive, and to play kitten frolics; and continued to be
-thus nurtured, till, at no great length of time, she became so much
-larger than her foster-parent, and required so much food, as to induce
-the necessity of weaning her.
-
-But the two quadrupeds continued, ever after, to live together on the
-most friendly and affectionate terms; constantly inhabiting the same
-cage, and habitually partaking of the same messes of provision. The
-Lioness, though now grown large, having never seen any other mother,
-continued through life to shew marks of daughterly obedience, and the
-bitch, of maternal regard. Mr. EDWIN LANDSEER, as well as many others,
-has frequently seen them caressing each other in their cage at the
-Exeter ’Change Menagerie, in the manner which he has represented: the
-Drawing, which exhibits portraits both of the LIONESS and BITCH, having
-been done some years ago.
-
-And these kitten frolics, or the youthful disposition to indulge in
-them, continued on the part of the Lioness, till her older and graver
-nurse became tired of the lion-play, and would sometimes snarl and bark
-forbiddingly. It was very entertaining, and an interesting chapter in
-Natural History, to behold this; for the Bitch ever retained an
-ascendancy, and much of the authority, of a parent: so that her
-foster-daughter, though so much larger, and so tremendously powerful,
-would retire obediently to the farther corner of the cage, waiting a
-favourable change of temper, on the part of her senior, before she
-renewed her playful familiarities.
-
-On a principle of prudence, however, and because it was judged that if
-these inmates of the same refectory, ever quarrelled, it would be at a
-meal-time, they were of late separately fed: that is to say, not at
-separate times, or tables, but, at opposite corners of the apartment:
-but the Bitch has often been known to help herself out of _Charlotte’s_
-portion, without fear or ceremony, and her majesty to shew no
-resentment, nor any kind of royal displeasure or hurt feeling, at the
-indecorum.
-
-We esteem this Engraving to afford a fair example of the positive, or
-negative, power of the sovereign of the forest, of physiognomically
-expressing the gentler emotions. But it occurs to us here—and we mention
-it in reference to an argument maintained in an earlier part of this
-dissertation—that perhaps licking with the tongue may belong to the dumb
-language of quadrupedal expression of affection. But the Dog, and the
-Cat, kind, express themselves in this way; and amongst each other, it
-cannot be misunderstood—the affectionate idea being impressed at the
-period of their very earliest susceptibilities, and associated—perhaps
-as indissolubly as the human endearments of smiles and kissing—with
-their youngest, purest, and most permanent recollections.
-
-
- No. XVIII.
-
-In this plate the ideas of expeditious motion, and quest, are admirably
-depicted:—kept up from stem to stern; he is evidently bent on
-destruction.—This is he that appeared to the terrified imagination of
-COLLINS’S Oriental camel-driver, who, in his beautiful Eclogue,
-exclaims—
-
- “What, if the LION _in his rage_ I meet!”
-
-And the determined purpose which pervades the whole frame and the mind
-of the sallying hero, is seen in his resolute look, as well as in every
-motion of his muscular limbs—aye, to the very tuft at the extremity of
-his tail. All is expressive of his plenitude of animation, and prey is
-obviously his purpose. None can mistake him.
-
-This will probably be thought another of the instances in which the
-present artists have been eminently successful in the execution of their
-subject. (For the design they were indebted to the etching-needle of
-RIDINGER.) The shag of the mane is characteristically varied from the
-short hair which covers the face, body, and limbs; the anatomy is ably
-indicated; and the chiaroscuro is vigorous.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 18
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-LION after REYDINGER.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-The hunters say that a dozen or fifteen dogs, trained to the sport, will
-overpower a Lion before he can strike many blows: but these are the
-limbs which “at every blow destroy an enemy.”
-
-We have next to treat of the ROYAL TIGER OF BENGAL, beautiful, powerful,
-fierce, and unrelenting.—Terrible, yet admirable!
-
-Mr. BEWICK says that the Tiger “is the most rapacious and destructive of
-all carnivorous animals. Fierce without provocation, and cruel without
-necessity, its thirst for blood is insatiable. Though glutted with
-slaughter, it continues its carnage; it fears neither the sight nor the
-opposition of man, whom it frequently makes its prey; and it is even
-said to prefer human flesh to that of any other animal:” a fact which is
-confirmed by COLONEL WILLIAMSON, and Mr. PAUL of Daudpore, the latter of
-whom has the reputation of having killed as many Tigers as any hundred
-other men in India.
-
-The strength of this animal is so great, that when it has killed a Deer,
-it carries it off with much ease. WOOD relates a story, on good
-authority, of a Buffalo being carried off by one; but it had previously
-refreshed itself by sucking the Buffalo’s blood. The latter had been
-hampered, and was weakened by its struggles in a quagmire; and the Tiger
-let fall its prey, and fled at the approach of some Indian peasants. We
-must suppose, too, this Tiger to have been one of the largest, and of
-extraordinary power, for COLONEL WILLIAMSON reports that in the public
-combats that are sometimes exhibited in India, between Tigers and
-Buffaloes, the latter is commonly the victor.
-
-But the eagerness of its voracity is believed to transcend that of any
-other creature whatever. If undisturbed at the commencement of its meal,
-it plunges its head into the body of its reeking victim, up to the very
-eyes, in order to glut itself with the bloody enjoyment. Oysters are not
-opened and swallowed with more zest and avidity.
-
-
- No. XIX.
-
-The commencement of such A CARNIVOROUS FEAST, where the TIGER has seized
-and slain—not a wild Buffalo, but a BULLOCK, from the tame herds of
-Hindostan. As the cattle descend toward the river to drink, their crafty
-enemy lies in ambush among the jungle, or creeps along cautiously and
-unseen; and, watching a favourable opportunity, makes his murderous
-spring.
-
-Although WILLIAMSON corroborates MR. BEWICK’S account of the Tiger’s
-fondness of human flesh, he does not agree to that of its fearlessness.
-On the contrary, he thinks that on occasions where Tigers have seemed
-fearless, momentary anguish or resentment, has been their real stimulus;
-and adds, that “the Tiger is, of all beasts of prey, the most cowardly;
-its treacherous disposition induces it, almost without exception, to
-conceal itself until its prey may arrive within reach of its spring, be
-its victim either bulky or diminutive. Size seems to occasion no
-deviation in the Tiger’s system of attack, which is founded on the art
-of surprising. We find, accordingly, that such as happen to keep the
-opposite side of a road, by which they are somewhat beyond the first
-spring, often escape injury; the Tiger being unwilling to be seen before
-he is felt. Hence it is rarely that a Tiger pursues; but, if the
-situation permit, his cunning will not fail to effect his purpose, he
-will steal along the road-side among the bushes parallel with the
-traveller’s course, until one of the many chances which present
-themselves of finding him within reach, induces to the attack. Often,
-where the country is rather too open to allow his proceeding in this
-manner, the Tiger will take a sweep among underwood or through ravines,
-in order to meet the traveller again at a spot whence he may make his
-spring.
-
-“Tigers are extremely partial to such sites as command a road, selecting
-one rather less frequented, in preference to one that is much in use. In
-the former, they are certain of finding as much as will answer their
-daily wants. If, however, the haunt be on a public road, it is usually
-at some spot abounding with grass or bushes, especially the _prauss_,
-and in the vicinity of some ample cover supplied with water, to which
-the prey can be dragged. There, in some low, opake spot, the sanguinary
-meal is consummated in gloomy silence.
-
-“It should be observed, that for the most part the Tiger chooses his
-station on that side of the road which is opposite to his haunt; so
-that, when he seizes his prey, he proceeds straight forward, without
-having occasion to turn, and thus drags it across mostly at a trot. If
-he misses his aim, he will rarely return, unless attacked; but, in a
-sullen manner, either skulks through the cover; or, if the country be
-not sufficiently close to conceal his motions, he moves on at a canter.”
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 19
-
-_E. Landseer del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._
-
-TIGER & INDIAN BULLOCK after NATURE.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 20
-
-SENEGAL LION after REYDINGER.
-
-BLACK-MANED LION after REMBRANDT.
-
-LIONESS after REYDINGER.
-
-_E. Spilsbury del^t._ _T. Landseer sculp^t._]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Finding the same anecdotes of Lions and Tigers repeated from book to
-book, the present writer has in general avoided to reiterate what he
-conceived would in most instances prove to have been already read: but
-he cannot wholly pass that in which a lady—next to the Royal Tiger
-himself—was the principal figure; more especially as it illustrates a
-fact of natural history not useless for Oriental travellers to be
-acquainted with—namely, the susceptibility of the Tiger of sudden alarm.
-
-Some ladies and gentlemen being on a party of pleasure, under a shade of
-trees on the banks of a river in Bengal, were suddenly surprised at
-seeing a Tiger ready to make its fatal spring. One of the ladies, with
-amazing presence of mind, laid hold of an umbrella, and unfurling it
-directly in the animal’s face, it instantly retired.
-
-The following also confirms WILLIAMSON’S account of the Tigers which are
-brought up tame by some of the mendicant Indian priests who inhabit the
-banks of the Ganges.
-
-A beautiful young male Tiger was brought from China, some twenty years
-ago in the Pitt East Indiaman: at the age of ten months it was so far
-domesticated, as to admit every kind of familiarity from the people on
-board. It seemed to be quite harmless, and was as playful as a kitten.
-It frequently slept with the sailors in their hammocks, and would suffer
-two or three of them to repose their heads upon its back, as upon a
-pillow, whilst it lay stretched out upon the deck. In return for this,
-it would, however, now and then steal their meat. Having one day taken a
-piece of beef from the carpenter, he followed the animal, took the meat
-out of its mouth, and beat it severely for the theft; which punishment
-it suffered with all the patience of a dog. It would frequently run out
-on the bowsprit; climb about the ship like a cat; and perform a number
-of tricks with an agility that was truly astonishing. There was a Dog on
-board the ship, with which it would often play in the most diverting
-manner. But it ought to be remembered at the time this Tiger was taken
-on board the ship, it was only a month or six weeks old; and when
-arrived in this country, it had not quite completed a year.
-
-
- No. XX.
-
-THREE small LIONS, on a single Plate; forming a sort of tail-piece, and
-bringing up the rear of our carnivorous procession.
-
-This plate exhibits three different VARIETIES. THE LION OF SENEGAL,
-nearly in profile, reclined, but under the influence of some slight
-degree of irritation; the black-maned LION of AFRICA; and the common
-LIONESS of ASIA, regaling herself on a dead bird.
-
-The upper and lower subjects, are after RIDINGER. The African Lion, in
-the middle, is originally from REMBRANDT, but has passed through the
-medium of an indifferent Etching by PICART; and, like the rest, has
-finally been corrected by a reference to Nature.—We believe it was
-corrected from the specimen that was some few years ago presented to
-LADY CASTLEREAGH; which was exhibited at Exeter ’Change, and of which
-MR. EDWIN LANDSEER and MR. THOMAS CHRISTMAS had the _post-obit_
-reversion.
-
-
- G. NORMAN, PRINTER, MAIDEN LANE, COVENT GARDEN.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- SUPPLEMENTARY PLATES.
-
-
- PLATE XXI.
- NEPTUNE, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-A beautiful and highly characteristic engraving of a favourite
-Newfoundland Dog. It is engraved by Mr. Thomas Landseer from a drawing
-by his brother Edwin, and highly admired as a faithful likeness of the
-original.
-
-
- PLATE XXII.
- BRUTUS, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-The property of Edwin Landseer, Esq. Good judges may at once perceive in
-this portrait the points that constitute a thorough good one of the
-breed. Rough, wiry and strong, with eyes almost concealed, Brutus is yet
-active, vigilant and courageous, possessing in great perfection the
-qualities most desirable in the terrier.
-
-
- PLATE XXIII.
- A CROSS OF THE DOG AND FOX, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY T.
- LANDSEER.
-
-The subject of this fine engraving had occasioned much doubt in the
-minds of naturalists, but the question as to its reality was decided, by
-the fact of the animal whose portrait we give, having been produced from
-a tan terrier bitch and a tame dog fox.
-
-
- PLATE XXIV.
- DOGS SETTING A HARE, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-Two dogs having caught the side wind of a hare are making a highly
-characteristic point. Nothing can more forcibly express that mute
-animation which gives so highly-toned a finish to the abilities of the
-setting dog as this vigorous and faithful delineation of their
-countenances. The Pointer is placed in a very interesting attitude
-admirably contrasted with the well chosen position of the setter his
-companion; while the hare, the object of their attraction, is not only
-judiciously placed, but the representation is strikingly true to nature.
-This representation of dogs setting a hare displays not only a correct
-knowledge of the subject but is one of those faithful delineations that
-cannot fail to merit the most unqualified approbation.
-
-
- PLATE XXV.
- VIXEN, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-A thorough-bred Scottish terrier, a favourite portrait by Mr. Edwin
-Landseer who has repeated her in several of his pictures.
-
-
- PLATE XXVI.
-FOX HOUNDS OF THE HATFIELD HUNT, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY T.
- LANDSEER.
-
-This sketch contains portraits of five of the principal fox hounds
-belonging to the above Hunt.
-
-
- PLATE XXVII.
- PROCTOR, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-Study of a head of a Blood-hound. This engraving is of a very celebrated
-dog, and the character of its peculiar species is well delineated.
-
-
- PLATE XXVIII.
- BOB, A FAVOURITE TERRIER, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY T.
- LANDSEER.
-
-This engraving represents a fine wire-haired specimen of his race,
-engaged in his favourite pursuit in his native wilds.
-
-
- PLATE XXIX.
- THE POACHER, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-Is not one of those who
-
- “Take delight of a shiny night,
- In the season of the year,”
-
-to pop pheasants from their perches with an air gun, or who sets
-“springes to catch woodcocks,” but it is he who
-
- “Skulks along
- Sleek at the shepherd’s cost, and plump with meals
- Purloined;”
-
-“The wily Fox,” and a very beautiful animal Mr. Landseer has made of
-him. The description we have quoted, finds in the picture an apt
-illustration.
-
-
- PLATE XXX.
- ALPINE MASTIFF, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-The drawing from which the present plate was engraved, was made from a
-very noble Alpine mastiff, which at that time although not full grown,
-was the largest dog in England.
-
-
- PLATE XXXI.
- OLD DOG, LOOKS LIKE A PICTURE, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY J.
- WEBB.
-
-An expressive picture, which betokens the subject, old in honour and
-years, and still following his favourite pursuit.
-
-
- PLATE XXXII.
- FIGHT BETWEEN JACKO AND PUSS, SKETCHED AND ETCHED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-The animals here so cleverly represented, and at the spot of their
-actual and sanguinary contest, were etched by T. Landseer, from a sketch
-made at the time by himself.
-
-
- PLATE XXXIII.
- LITTLE BILLY, DRAWN AND ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-The spirited and faithful style in which Mr. Landseer has executed this
-embellishment, presents us a portrait of a species of animal which was a
-great favourite with our ancestors, and was as ferocious to an enemy as
-faithful to a friend.
-
-
- PLATE XXXIV.
- BLACK CAP, PAINTED BY G. H. LAPORTE, ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-Is a clever specimen of a perfect Harrier’s head, ably treated.
-
-
- PLATE XXXV.
- DEAD RED DEER, PAINTED BY E. LANDSEER, ENGRAVED BY J. R. SCOTT.
-
-Gives us the spoils of the chase lifeless and rigid; the accessories to
-the picture are well told.
-
-
- PLATE XXXVI.
- TIGER HUNT, PAINTED AND ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-Tigers are hunted in India by Elephants assisted by fleet horses. We
-have in this clever picture a Tiger couching amongst the jungle
-seemingly undetermined whether to spring or to make off, the horse
-scared and frightened evidently has come upon him unexpectedly; an
-Elephant at a little distance is hastening towards the spot.
-
-
- PLATE XXXVII.
- TIGER TAKING THE WATER, PAINTED BY SIR CHARLES D’OYLY, ENGRAVED BY T.
- LANDSEER.
-
-The Tiger having been driven from the jungle and hunted over the plain,
-as a last resort takes to the water. He is here represented just after
-having entered, his powerful paws half above the water preparing to make
-a stroke, whilst his tail stiff and outstretched serves the purpose of a
-rudder. The hunters on their elephants from the bank of the river are
-taking a deliberate aim at him.
-
-
- PLATE XXXVIII.
- ELEPHANTS RETURNING FROM THE HUNT, PAINTED BY SIR CHARLES D’OYLY,
- ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-The Hunter seemingly tired of hunting on horseback has dismounted, and
-is climbing up the side of an elephant who kneels, whilst the fruit of
-the chase is upon the back of another, and a third is making his way
-through the jungle.
-
-
- PLATE XXXIX.
- RED DEER, PAINTED BY R. HILLS, ENGRAVED BY T. LANDSEER.
-
-A very clever work of Art upon which the great and universally
-acknowledged taste and talents of Mr. Thomas Landseer have been
-carefully bestowed. Both Painter and Engraver have done justice to the
-subject; few things can be finer than the stag in the foreground, or
-more effective than the brace of Does approaching upwards, as it were,
-from a romantic and obscure retirement.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 21
-
-_Engraved by T. Landseer from a Drawing by his Brother Edwin._
-
-_Neptune, the property of W. E. Gosling Esq^r._]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 22
-
-_Painted by E. Landseer & Engraved by T. Landseer._
-
-BRUTUS.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 23
-
-_Engraved by T. Landseer from a Sketch by his brother Edwin._
-
-_Portrait of a Cross of the Dog and Fox, in the possession of Lord
- Cranley._]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 24
-
-_Engraved by T. Landseer from a Drawing by his Brother Edwin._
-
-_Dogs Setting a Hare._]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 25
-
-_Eng^d. by T. Landseer from a Painting by his Brother._
-
-_Vixen, a Thorough bred Scotch Terrier._]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 26
-
-_Elliner_ _Lettager_ _Strider_ _Rachell_ _Adamant_
-
-_Fox Hounds, of the Hatfield Hunt._
-_Engraved by Tho^s. Landseer from a Painting by his Brother Edwin._]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 27
-
-_Eng^d. by T. Landseer from a Painting by his Brother Edwin._
-
-PROCTER.
-_Study of a Blood hounds Head._]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 28
-
-_Engraved by T. Landseer from a Painting by his Brother Edwin._
-
-_Bob, a favourite Terrier the property of W. E. Gosling Esq^r._]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 29
-
-_Eng^d. by T. Landseer from a Drawing by his Brother Edwin._
-
-_The Poacher._]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 30
-
-_Eng^d. by T. Landseer from a Drawing by his Brother._
-
-_Alpine Mastiff._]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 31
-
-Painted by E. Landseer R. A. Engraved by J. Webb.
-
-THE OLD DOG LOOKS LIKE A PICTURE.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 32
-
-_Etch’d by T. Landseer, from a sketch made at the time by himself._
-
-_Fight between “Jacko Maccacco,” a celebrated Monkey, and M^r. Tho^s.
- Cribb’s well known bitch “Puss.”_]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 33
-
-_Drawn and Engraved by Thomas Landseer._
-
-LITTLE BILLY, A Celebrated Bull Dog.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 34
-
-_Eng^d. by T. Landseer, from a Painting by G. H. Laporte._
-
-BLACK CAP.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 35
-
-DEAD RED DEER.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 36
-
-TIGER HUNT]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 37
-
-TIGER TAKING THE WATER]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 38
-
-ELEPHANTS RETURNING FROM THE HUNT.]
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-[Illustration: 39
-
-_Engraved by M^r. T. Landseer, from a Painting by M^r. R. Hills._
-
-RED DEER.]
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Engravings of Lions, Tigers, Panthers,
-Leopards, Dogs, &c., by Thomas Landseer
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGRAVINGS OF LIONS, TIGERS ***
-
-***** This file should be named 53290-0.txt or 53290-0.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/5/3/2/9/53290/
-
-Produced by MWS, ellinora and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images generously made available by The
-Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
-specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
-eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
-for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
-performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
-away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
-not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
-trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country outside the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
- are located before using this ebook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
-Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
-mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
-volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
-locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
-Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
-date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
-official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
-
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-