summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/53153-h/53153-h.htm
blob: 9cb1987b80cb4a000106f1fad38cc0fe55415e85 (plain) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2170
2171
2172
2173
2174
2175
2176
2177
2178
2179
2180
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187
2188
2189
2190
2191
2192
2193
2194
2195
2196
2197
2198
2199
2200
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2397
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
2437
2438
2439
2440
2441
2442
2443
2444
2445
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2452
2453
2454
2455
2456
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469
2470
2471
2472
2473
2474
2475
2476
2477
2478
2479
2480
2481
2482
2483
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489
2490
2491
2492
2493
2494
2495
2496
2497
2498
2499
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
2542
2543
2544
2545
2546
2547
2548
2549
2550
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555
2556
2557
2558
2559
2560
2561
2562
2563
2564
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
2570
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579
2580
2581
2582
2583
2584
2585
2586
2587
2588
2589
2590
2591
2592
2593
2594
2595
2596
2597
2598
2599
2600
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2614
2615
2616
2617
2618
2619
2620
2621
2622
2623
2624
2625
2626
2627
2628
2629
2630
2631
2632
2633
2634
2635
2636
2637
2638
2639
2640
2641
2642
2643
2644
2645
2646
2647
2648
2649
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2656
2657
2658
2659
2660
2661
2662
2663
2664
2665
2666
2667
2668
2669
2670
2671
2672
2673
2674
2675
2676
2677
2678
2679
2680
2681
2682
2683
2684
2685
2686
2687
2688
2689
2690
2691
2692
2693
2694
2695
2696
2697
2698
2699
2700
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2720
2721
2722
2723
2724
2725
2726
2727
2728
2729
2730
2731
2732
2733
2734
2735
2736
2737
2738
2739
2740
2741
2742
2743
2744
2745
2746
2747
2748
2749
2750
2751
2752
2753
2754
2755
2756
2757
2758
2759
2760
2761
2762
2763
2764
2765
2766
2767
2768
2769
2770
2771
2772
2773
2774
2775
2776
2777
2778
2779
2780
2781
2782
2783
2784
2785
2786
2787
2788
2789
2790
2791
2792
2793
2794
2795
2796
2797
2798
2799
2800
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2844
2845
2846
2847
2848
2849
2850
2851
2852
2853
2854
2855
2856
2857
2858
2859
2860
2861
2862
2863
2864
2865
2866
2867
2868
2869
2870
2871
2872
2873
2874
2875
2876
2877
2878
2879
2880
2881
2882
2883
2884
2885
2886
2887
2888
2889
2890
2891
2892
2893
2894
2895
2896
2897
2898
2899
2900
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
2928
2929
2930
2931
2932
2933
2934
2935
2936
2937
2938
2939
2940
2941
2942
2943
2944
2945
2946
2947
2948
2949
2950
2951
2952
2953
2954
2955
2956
2957
2958
2959
2960
2961
2962
2963
2964
2965
2966
2967
2968
2969
2970
2971
2972
2973
2974
2975
2976
2977
2978
2979
2980
2981
2982
2983
2984
2985
2986
2987
2988
2989
2990
2991
2992
2993
2994
2995
2996
2997
2998
2999
3000
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3046
3047
3048
3049
3050
3051
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
3070
3071
3072
3073
3074
3075
3076
3077
3078
3079
3080
3081
3082
3083
3084
3085
3086
3087
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
3094
3095
3096
3097
3098
3099
3100
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3116
3117
3118
3119
3120
3121
3122
3123
3124
3125
3126
3127
3128
3129
3130
3131
3132
3133
3134
3135
3136
3137
3138
3139
3140
3141
3142
3143
3144
3145
3146
3147
3148
3149
3150
3151
3152
3153
3154
3155
3156
3157
3158
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3164
3165
3166
3167
3168
3169
3170
3171
3172
3173
3174
3175
3176
3177
3178
3179
3180
3181
3182
3183
3184
3185
3186
3187
3188
3189
3190
3191
3192
3193
3194
3195
3196
3197
3198
3199
3200
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3208
3209
3210
3211
3212
3213
3214
3215
3216
3217
3218
3219
3220
3221
3222
3223
3224
3225
3226
3227
3228
3229
3230
3231
3232
3233
3234
3235
3236
3237
3238
3239
3240
3241
3242
3243
3244
3245
3246
3247
3248
3249
3250
3251
3252
3253
3254
3255
3256
3257
3258
3259
3260
3261
3262
3263
3264
3265
3266
3267
3268
3269
3270
3271
3272
3273
3274
3275
3276
3277
3278
3279
3280
3281
3282
3283
3284
3285
3286
3287
3288
3289
3290
3291
3292
3293
3294
3295
3296
3297
3298
3299
3300
3301
3302
3303
3304
3305
3306
3307
3308
3309
3310
3311
3312
3313
3314
3315
3316
3317
3318
3319
3320
3321
3322
3323
3324
3325
3326
3327
3328
3329
3330
3331
3332
3333
3334
3335
3336
3337
3338
3339
3340
3341
3342
3343
3344
3345
3346
3347
3348
3349
3350
3351
3352
3353
3354
3355
3356
3357
3358
3359
3360
3361
3362
3363
3364
3365
3366
3367
3368
3369
3370
3371
3372
3373
3374
3375
3376
3377
3378
3379
3380
3381
3382
3383
3384
3385
3386
3387
3388
3389
3390
3391
3392
3393
3394
3395
3396
3397
3398
3399
3400
3401
3402
3403
3404
3405
3406
3407
3408
3409
3410
3411
3412
3413
3414
3415
3416
3417
3418
3419
3420
3421
3422
3423
3424
3425
3426
3427
3428
3429
3430
3431
3432
3433
3434
3435
3436
3437
3438
3439
3440
3441
3442
3443
3444
3445
3446
3447
3448
3449
3450
3451
3452
3453
3454
3455
3456
3457
3458
3459
3460
3461
3462
3463
3464
3465
3466
3467
3468
3469
3470
3471
3472
3473
3474
3475
3476
3477
3478
3479
3480
3481
3482
3483
3484
3485
3486
3487
3488
3489
3490
3491
3492
3493
3494
3495
3496
3497
3498
3499
3500
3501
3502
3503
3504
3505
3506
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3512
3513
3514
3515
3516
3517
3518
3519
3520
3521
3522
3523
3524
3525
3526
3527
3528
3529
3530
3531
3532
3533
3534
3535
3536
3537
3538
3539
3540
3541
3542
3543
3544
3545
3546
3547
3548
3549
3550
3551
3552
3553
3554
3555
3556
3557
3558
3559
3560
3561
3562
3563
3564
3565
3566
3567
3568
3569
3570
3571
3572
3573
3574
3575
3576
3577
3578
3579
3580
3581
3582
3583
3584
3585
3586
3587
3588
3589
3590
3591
3592
3593
3594
3595
3596
3597
3598
3599
3600
3601
3602
3603
3604
3605
3606
3607
3608
3609
3610
3611
3612
3613
3614
3615
3616
3617
3618
3619
3620
3621
3622
3623
3624
3625
3626
3627
3628
3629
3630
3631
3632
3633
3634
3635
3636
3637
3638
3639
3640
3641
3642
3643
3644
3645
3646
3647
3648
3649
3650
3651
3652
3653
3654
3655
3656
3657
3658
3659
3660
3661
3662
3663
3664
3665
3666
3667
3668
3669
3670
3671
3672
3673
3674
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
3682
3683
3684
3685
3686
3687
3688
3689
3690
3691
3692
3693
3694
3695
3696
3697
3698
3699
3700
3701
3702
3703
3704
3705
3706
3707
3708
3709
3710
3711
3712
3713
3714
3715
3716
3717
3718
3719
3720
3721
3722
3723
3724
3725
3726
3727
3728
3729
3730
3731
3732
3733
3734
3735
3736
3737
3738
3739
3740
3741
3742
3743
3744
3745
3746
3747
3748
3749
3750
3751
3752
3753
3754
3755
3756
3757
3758
3759
3760
3761
3762
3763
3764
3765
3766
3767
3768
3769
3770
3771
3772
3773
3774
3775
3776
3777
3778
3779
3780
3781
3782
3783
3784
3785
3786
3787
3788
3789
3790
3791
3792
3793
3794
3795
3796
3797
3798
3799
3800
3801
3802
3803
3804
3805
3806
3807
3808
3809
3810
3811
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816
3817
3818
3819
3820
3821
3822
3823
3824
3825
3826
3827
3828
3829
3830
3831
3832
3833
3834
3835
3836
3837
3838
3839
3840
3841
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848
3849
3850
3851
3852
3853
3854
3855
3856
3857
3858
3859
3860
3861
3862
3863
3864
3865
3866
3867
3868
3869
3870
3871
3872
3873
3874
3875
3876
3877
3878
3879
3880
3881
3882
3883
3884
3885
3886
3887
3888
3889
3890
3891
3892
3893
3894
3895
3896
3897
3898
3899
3900
3901
3902
3903
3904
3905
3906
3907
3908
3909
3910
3911
3912
3913
3914
3915
3916
3917
3918
3919
3920
3921
3922
3923
3924
3925
3926
3927
3928
3929
3930
3931
3932
3933
3934
3935
3936
3937
3938
3939
3940
3941
3942
3943
3944
3945
3946
3947
3948
3949
3950
3951
3952
3953
3954
3955
3956
3957
3958
3959
3960
3961
3962
3963
3964
3965
3966
3967
3968
3969
3970
3971
3972
3973
3974
3975
3976
3977
3978
3979
3980
3981
3982
3983
3984
3985
3986
3987
3988
3989
3990
3991
3992
3993
3994
3995
3996
3997
3998
3999
4000
4001
4002
4003
4004
4005
4006
4007
4008
4009
4010
4011
4012
4013
4014
4015
4016
4017
4018
4019
4020
4021
4022
4023
4024
4025
4026
4027
4028
4029
4030
4031
4032
4033
4034
4035
4036
4037
4038
4039
4040
4041
4042
4043
4044
4045
4046
4047
4048
4049
4050
4051
4052
4053
4054
4055
4056
4057
4058
4059
4060
4061
4062
4063
4064
4065
4066
4067
4068
4069
4070
4071
4072
4073
4074
4075
4076
4077
4078
4079
4080
4081
4082
4083
4084
4085
4086
4087
4088
4089
4090
4091
4092
4093
4094
4095
4096
4097
4098
4099
4100
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
4106
4107
4108
4109
4110
4111
4112
4113
4114
4115
4116
4117
4118
4119
4120
4121
4122
4123
4124
4125
4126
4127
4128
4129
4130
4131
4132
4133
4134
4135
4136
4137
4138
4139
4140
4141
4142
4143
4144
4145
4146
4147
4148
4149
4150
4151
4152
4153
4154
4155
4156
4157
4158
4159
4160
4161
4162
4163
4164
4165
4166
4167
4168
4169
4170
4171
4172
4173
4174
4175
4176
4177
4178
4179
4180
4181
4182
4183
4184
4185
4186
4187
4188
4189
4190
4191
4192
4193
4194
4195
4196
4197
4198
4199
4200
4201
4202
4203
4204
4205
4206
4207
4208
4209
4210
4211
4212
4213
4214
4215
4216
4217
4218
4219
4220
4221
4222
4223
4224
4225
4226
4227
4228
4229
4230
4231
4232
4233
4234
4235
4236
4237
4238
4239
4240
4241
4242
4243
4244
4245
4246
4247
4248
4249
4250
4251
4252
4253
4254
4255
4256
4257
4258
4259
4260
4261
4262
4263
4264
4265
4266
4267
4268
4269
4270
4271
4272
4273
4274
4275
4276
4277
4278
4279
4280
4281
4282
4283
4284
4285
4286
4287
4288
4289
4290
4291
4292
4293
4294
4295
4296
4297
4298
4299
4300
4301
4302
4303
4304
4305
4306
4307
4308
4309
4310
4311
4312
4313
4314
4315
4316
4317
4318
4319
4320
4321
4322
4323
4324
4325
4326
4327
4328
4329
4330
4331
4332
4333
4334
4335
4336
4337
4338
4339
4340
4341
4342
4343
4344
4345
4346
4347
4348
4349
4350
4351
4352
4353
4354
4355
4356
4357
4358
4359
4360
4361
4362
4363
4364
4365
4366
4367
4368
4369
4370
4371
4372
4373
4374
4375
4376
4377
4378
4379
4380
4381
4382
4383
4384
4385
4386
4387
4388
4389
4390
4391
4392
4393
4394
4395
4396
4397
4398
4399
4400
4401
4402
4403
4404
4405
4406
4407
4408
4409
4410
4411
4412
4413
4414
4415
4416
4417
4418
4419
4420
4421
4422
4423
4424
4425
4426
4427
4428
4429
4430
4431
4432
4433
4434
4435
4436
4437
4438
4439
4440
4441
4442
4443
4444
4445
4446
4447
4448
4449
4450
4451
4452
4453
4454
4455
4456
4457
4458
4459
4460
4461
4462
4463
4464
4465
4466
4467
4468
4469
4470
4471
4472
4473
4474
4475
4476
4477
4478
4479
4480
4481
4482
4483
4484
4485
4486
4487
4488
4489
4490
4491
4492
4493
4494
4495
4496
4497
4498
4499
4500
4501
4502
4503
4504
4505
4506
4507
4508
4509
4510
4511
4512
4513
4514
4515
4516
4517
4518
4519
4520
4521
4522
4523
4524
4525
4526
4527
4528
4529
4530
4531
4532
4533
4534
4535
4536
4537
4538
4539
4540
4541
4542
4543
4544
4545
4546
4547
4548
4549
4550
4551
4552
4553
4554
4555
4556
4557
4558
4559
4560
4561
4562
4563
4564
4565
4566
4567
4568
4569
4570
4571
4572
4573
4574
4575
4576
4577
4578
4579
4580
4581
4582
4583
4584
4585
4586
4587
4588
4589
4590
4591
4592
4593
4594
4595
4596
4597
4598
4599
4600
4601
4602
4603
4604
4605
4606
4607
4608
4609
4610
4611
4612
4613
4614
4615
4616
4617
4618
4619
4620
4621
4622
4623
4624
4625
4626
4627
4628
4629
4630
4631
4632
4633
4634
4635
4636
4637
4638
4639
4640
4641
4642
4643
4644
4645
4646
4647
4648
4649
4650
4651
4652
4653
4654
4655
4656
4657
4658
4659
4660
4661
4662
4663
4664
4665
4666
4667
4668
4669
4670
4671
4672
4673
4674
4675
4676
4677
4678
4679
4680
4681
4682
4683
4684
4685
4686
4687
4688
4689
4690
4691
4692
4693
4694
4695
4696
4697
4698
4699
4700
4701
4702
4703
4704
4705
4706
4707
4708
4709
4710
4711
4712
4713
4714
4715
4716
4717
4718
4719
4720
4721
4722
4723
4724
4725
4726
4727
4728
4729
4730
4731
4732
4733
4734
4735
4736
4737
4738
4739
4740
4741
4742
4743
4744
4745
4746
4747
4748
4749
4750
4751
4752
4753
4754
4755
4756
4757
4758
4759
4760
4761
4762
4763
4764
4765
4766
4767
4768
4769
4770
4771
4772
4773
4774
4775
4776
4777
4778
4779
4780
4781
4782
4783
4784
4785
4786
4787
4788
4789
4790
4791
4792
4793
4794
4795
4796
4797
4798
4799
4800
4801
4802
4803
4804
4805
4806
4807
4808
4809
4810
4811
4812
4813
4814
4815
4816
4817
4818
4819
4820
4821
4822
4823
4824
4825
4826
4827
4828
4829
4830
4831
4832
4833
4834
4835
4836
4837
4838
4839
4840
4841
4842
4843
4844
4845
4846
4847
4848
4849
4850
4851
4852
4853
4854
4855
4856
4857
4858
4859
4860
4861
4862
4863
4864
4865
4866
4867
4868
4869
4870
4871
4872
4873
4874
4875
4876
4877
4878
4879
4880
4881
4882
4883
4884
4885
4886
4887
4888
4889
4890
4891
4892
4893
4894
4895
4896
4897
4898
4899
4900
4901
4902
4903
4904
4905
4906
4907
4908
4909
4910
4911
4912
4913
4914
4915
4916
4917
4918
4919
4920
4921
4922
4923
4924
4925
4926
4927
4928
4929
4930
4931
4932
4933
4934
4935
4936
4937
4938
4939
4940
4941
4942
4943
4944
4945
4946
4947
4948
4949
4950
4951
4952
4953
4954
4955
4956
4957
4958
4959
4960
4961
4962
4963
4964
4965
4966
4967
4968
4969
4970
4971
4972
4973
4974
4975
4976
4977
4978
4979
4980
4981
4982
4983
4984
4985
4986
4987
4988
4989
4990
4991
4992
4993
4994
4995
4996
4997
4998
4999
5000
5001
5002
5003
5004
5005
5006
5007
5008
5009
5010
5011
5012
5013
5014
5015
5016
5017
5018
5019
5020
5021
5022
5023
5024
5025
5026
5027
5028
5029
5030
5031
5032
5033
5034
5035
5036
5037
5038
5039
5040
5041
5042
5043
5044
5045
5046
5047
5048
5049
5050
5051
5052
5053
5054
5055
5056
5057
5058
5059
5060
5061
5062
5063
5064
5065
5066
5067
5068
5069
5070
5071
5072
5073
5074
5075
5076
5077
5078
5079
5080
5081
5082
5083
5084
5085
5086
5087
5088
5089
5090
5091
5092
5093
5094
5095
5096
5097
5098
5099
5100
5101
5102
5103
5104
5105
5106
5107
5108
5109
5110
5111
5112
5113
5114
5115
5116
5117
5118
5119
5120
5121
5122
5123
5124
5125
5126
5127
5128
5129
5130
5131
5132
5133
5134
5135
5136
5137
5138
5139
5140
5141
5142
5143
5144
5145
5146
5147
5148
5149
5150
5151
5152
5153
5154
5155
5156
5157
5158
5159
5160
5161
5162
5163
5164
5165
5166
5167
5168
5169
5170
5171
5172
5173
5174
5175
5176
5177
5178
5179
5180
5181
5182
5183
5184
5185
5186
5187
5188
5189
5190
5191
5192
5193
5194
5195
5196
5197
5198
5199
5200
5201
5202
5203
5204
5205
5206
5207
5208
5209
5210
5211
5212
5213
5214
5215
5216
5217
5218
5219
5220
5221
5222
5223
5224
5225
5226
5227
5228
5229
5230
5231
5232
5233
5234
5235
5236
5237
5238
5239
5240
5241
5242
5243
5244
5245
5246
5247
5248
5249
5250
5251
5252
5253
5254
5255
5256
5257
5258
5259
5260
5261
5262
5263
5264
5265
5266
5267
5268
5269
5270
5271
5272
5273
5274
5275
5276
5277
5278
5279
5280
5281
5282
5283
5284
5285
5286
5287
5288
5289
5290
5291
5292
5293
5294
5295
5296
5297
5298
5299
5300
5301
5302
5303
5304
5305
5306
5307
5308
5309
5310
5311
5312
5313
5314
5315
5316
5317
5318
5319
5320
5321
5322
5323
5324
5325
5326
5327
5328
5329
5330
5331
5332
5333
5334
5335
5336
5337
5338
5339
5340
5341
5342
5343
5344
5345
5346
5347
5348
5349
5350
5351
5352
5353
5354
5355
5356
5357
5358
5359
5360
5361
5362
5363
5364
5365
5366
5367
5368
5369
5370
5371
5372
5373
5374
5375
5376
5377
5378
5379
5380
5381
5382
5383
5384
5385
5386
5387
5388
5389
5390
5391
5392
5393
5394
5395
5396
5397
5398
5399
5400
5401
5402
5403
5404
5405
5406
5407
5408
5409
5410
5411
5412
5413
5414
5415
5416
5417
5418
5419
5420
5421
5422
5423
5424
5425
5426
5427
5428
5429
5430
5431
5432
5433
5434
5435
5436
5437
5438
5439
5440
5441
5442
5443
5444
5445
5446
5447
5448
5449
5450
5451
5452
5453
5454
5455
5456
5457
5458
5459
5460
5461
5462
5463
5464
5465
5466
5467
5468
5469
5470
5471
5472
5473
5474
5475
5476
5477
5478
5479
5480
5481
5482
5483
5484
5485
5486
5487
5488
5489
5490
5491
5492
5493
5494
5495
5496
5497
5498
5499
5500
5501
5502
5503
5504
5505
5506
5507
5508
5509
5510
5511
5512
5513
5514
5515
5516
5517
5518
5519
5520
5521
5522
5523
5524
5525
5526
5527
5528
5529
5530
5531
5532
5533
5534
5535
5536
5537
5538
5539
5540
5541
5542
5543
5544
5545
5546
5547
5548
5549
5550
5551
5552
5553
5554
5555
5556
5557
5558
5559
5560
5561
5562
5563
5564
5565
5566
5567
5568
5569
5570
5571
5572
5573
5574
5575
5576
5577
5578
5579
5580
5581
5582
5583
5584
5585
5586
5587
5588
5589
5590
5591
5592
5593
5594
5595
5596
5597
5598
5599
5600
5601
5602
5603
5604
5605
5606
5607
5608
5609
5610
5611
5612
5613
5614
5615
5616
5617
5618
5619
5620
5621
5622
5623
5624
5625
5626
5627
5628
5629
5630
5631
5632
5633
5634
5635
5636
5637
5638
5639
5640
5641
5642
5643
5644
5645
5646
5647
5648
5649
5650
5651
5652
5653
5654
5655
5656
5657
5658
5659
5660
5661
5662
5663
5664
5665
5666
5667
5668
5669
5670
5671
5672
5673
5674
5675
5676
5677
5678
5679
5680
5681
5682
5683
5684
5685
5686
5687
5688
5689
5690
5691
5692
5693
5694
5695
5696
5697
5698
5699
5700
5701
5702
5703
5704
5705
5706
5707
5708
5709
5710
5711
5712
5713
5714
5715
5716
5717
5718
5719
5720
5721
5722
5723
5724
5725
5726
5727
5728
5729
5730
5731
5732
5733
5734
5735
5736
5737
5738
5739
5740
5741
5742
5743
5744
5745
5746
5747
5748
5749
5750
5751
5752
5753
5754
5755
5756
5757
5758
5759
5760
5761
5762
5763
5764
5765
5766
5767
5768
5769
5770
5771
5772
5773
5774
5775
5776
5777
5778
5779
5780
5781
5782
5783
5784
5785
5786
5787
5788
5789
5790
5791
5792
5793
5794
5795
5796
5797
5798
5799
5800
5801
5802
5803
5804
5805
5806
5807
5808
5809
5810
5811
5812
5813
5814
5815
5816
5817
5818
5819
5820
5821
5822
5823
5824
5825
5826
5827
5828
5829
5830
5831
5832
5833
5834
5835
5836
5837
5838
5839
5840
5841
5842
5843
5844
5845
5846
5847
5848
5849
5850
5851
5852
5853
5854
5855
5856
5857
5858
5859
5860
5861
5862
5863
5864
5865
5866
5867
5868
5869
5870
5871
5872
5873
5874
5875
5876
5877
5878
5879
5880
5881
5882
5883
5884
5885
5886
5887
5888
5889
5890
5891
5892
5893
5894
5895
5896
5897
5898
5899
5900
5901
5902
5903
5904
5905
5906
5907
5908
5909
5910
5911
5912
5913
5914
5915
5916
5917
5918
5919
5920
5921
5922
5923
5924
5925
5926
5927
5928
5929
5930
5931
5932
5933
5934
5935
5936
5937
5938
5939
5940
5941
5942
5943
5944
5945
5946
5947
5948
5949
5950
5951
5952
5953
5954
5955
5956
5957
5958
5959
5960
5961
5962
5963
5964
5965
5966
5967
5968
5969
5970
5971
5972
5973
5974
5975
5976
5977
5978
5979
5980
5981
5982
5983
5984
5985
5986
5987
5988
5989
5990
5991
5992
5993
5994
5995
5996
5997
5998
5999
6000
6001
6002
6003
6004
6005
6006
6007
6008
6009
6010
6011
6012
6013
6014
6015
6016
6017
6018
6019
6020
6021
6022
6023
6024
6025
6026
6027
6028
6029
6030
6031
6032
6033
6034
6035
6036
6037
6038
6039
6040
6041
6042
6043
6044
6045
6046
6047
6048
6049
6050
6051
6052
6053
6054
6055
6056
6057
6058
6059
6060
6061
6062
6063
6064
6065
6066
6067
6068
6069
6070
6071
6072
6073
6074
6075
6076
6077
6078
6079
6080
6081
6082
6083
6084
6085
6086
6087
6088
6089
6090
6091
6092
6093
6094
6095
6096
6097
6098
6099
6100
6101
6102
6103
6104
6105
6106
6107
6108
6109
6110
6111
6112
6113
6114
6115
6116
6117
6118
6119
6120
6121
6122
6123
6124
6125
6126
6127
6128
6129
6130
6131
6132
6133
6134
6135
6136
6137
6138
6139
6140
6141
6142
6143
6144
6145
6146
6147
6148
6149
6150
6151
6152
6153
6154
6155
6156
6157
6158
6159
6160
6161
6162
6163
6164
6165
6166
6167
6168
6169
6170
6171
6172
6173
6174
6175
6176
6177
6178
6179
6180
6181
6182
6183
6184
6185
6186
6187
6188
6189
6190
6191
6192
6193
6194
6195
6196
6197
6198
6199
6200
6201
6202
6203
6204
6205
6206
6207
6208
6209
6210
6211
6212
6213
6214
6215
6216
6217
6218
6219
6220
6221
6222
6223
6224
6225
6226
6227
6228
6229
6230
6231
6232
6233
6234
6235
6236
6237
6238
6239
6240
6241
6242
6243
6244
6245
6246
6247
6248
6249
6250
6251
6252
6253
6254
6255
6256
6257
6258
6259
6260
6261
6262
6263
6264
6265
6266
6267
6268
6269
6270
6271
6272
6273
6274
6275
6276
6277
6278
6279
6280
6281
6282
6283
6284
6285
6286
6287
6288
6289
6290
6291
6292
6293
6294
6295
6296
6297
6298
6299
6300
6301
6302
6303
6304
6305
6306
6307
6308
6309
6310
6311
6312
6313
6314
6315
6316
6317
6318
6319
6320
6321
6322
6323
6324
6325
6326
6327
6328
6329
6330
6331
6332
6333
6334
6335
6336
6337
6338
6339
6340
6341
6342
6343
6344
6345
6346
6347
6348
6349
6350
6351
6352
6353
6354
6355
6356
6357
6358
6359
6360
6361
6362
6363
6364
6365
6366
6367
6368
6369
6370
6371
6372
6373
6374
6375
6376
6377
6378
6379
6380
6381
6382
6383
6384
6385
6386
6387
6388
6389
6390
6391
6392
6393
6394
6395
6396
6397
6398
6399
6400
6401
6402
6403
6404
6405
6406
6407
6408
6409
6410
6411
6412
6413
6414
6415
6416
6417
6418
6419
6420
6421
6422
6423
6424
6425
6426
6427
6428
6429
6430
6431
6432
6433
6434
6435
6436
6437
6438
6439
6440
6441
6442
6443
6444
6445
6446
6447
6448
6449
6450
6451
6452
6453
6454
6455
6456
6457
6458
6459
6460
6461
6462
6463
6464
6465
6466
6467
6468
6469
6470
6471
6472
6473
6474
6475
6476
6477
6478
6479
6480
6481
6482
6483
6484
6485
6486
6487
6488
6489
6490
6491
6492
6493
6494
6495
6496
6497
6498
6499
6500
6501
6502
6503
6504
6505
6506
6507
6508
6509
6510
6511
6512
6513
6514
6515
6516
6517
6518
6519
6520
6521
6522
6523
6524
6525
6526
6527
6528
6529
6530
6531
6532
6533
6534
6535
6536
6537
6538
6539
6540
6541
6542
6543
6544
6545
6546
6547
6548
6549
6550
6551
6552
6553
6554
6555
6556
6557
6558
6559
6560
6561
6562
6563
6564
6565
6566
6567
6568
6569
6570
6571
6572
6573
6574
6575
6576
6577
6578
6579
6580
6581
6582
6583
6584
6585
6586
6587
6588
6589
6590
6591
6592
6593
6594
6595
6596
6597
6598
6599
6600
6601
6602
6603
6604
6605
6606
6607
6608
6609
6610
6611
6612
6613
6614
6615
6616
6617
6618
6619
6620
6621
6622
6623
6624
6625
6626
6627
6628
6629
6630
6631
6632
6633
6634
6635
6636
6637
6638
6639
6640
6641
6642
6643
6644
6645
6646
6647
6648
6649
6650
6651
6652
6653
6654
6655
6656
6657
6658
6659
6660
6661
6662
6663
6664
6665
6666
6667
6668
6669
6670
6671
6672
6673
6674
6675
6676
6677
6678
6679
6680
6681
6682
6683
6684
6685
6686
6687
6688
6689
6690
6691
6692
6693
6694
6695
6696
6697
6698
6699
6700
6701
6702
6703
6704
6705
6706
6707
6708
6709
6710
6711
6712
6713
6714
6715
6716
6717
6718
6719
6720
6721
6722
6723
6724
6725
6726
6727
6728
6729
6730
6731
6732
6733
6734
6735
6736
6737
6738
6739
6740
6741
6742
6743
6744
6745
6746
6747
6748
6749
6750
6751
6752
6753
6754
6755
6756
6757
6758
6759
6760
6761
6762
6763
6764
6765
6766
6767
6768
6769
6770
6771
6772
6773
6774
6775
6776
6777
6778
6779
6780
6781
6782
6783
6784
6785
6786
6787
6788
6789
6790
6791
6792
6793
6794
6795
6796
6797
6798
6799
6800
6801
6802
6803
6804
6805
6806
6807
6808
6809
6810
6811
6812
6813
6814
6815
6816
6817
6818
6819
6820
6821
6822
6823
6824
6825
6826
6827
6828
6829
6830
6831
6832
6833
6834
6835
6836
6837
6838
6839
6840
6841
6842
6843
6844
6845
6846
6847
6848
6849
6850
6851
6852
6853
6854
6855
6856
6857
6858
6859
6860
6861
6862
6863
6864
6865
6866
6867
6868
6869
6870
6871
6872
6873
6874
6875
6876
6877
6878
6879
6880
6881
6882
6883
6884
6885
6886
6887
6888
6889
6890
6891
6892
6893
6894
6895
6896
6897
6898
6899
6900
6901
6902
6903
6904
6905
6906
6907
6908
6909
6910
6911
6912
6913
6914
6915
6916
6917
6918
6919
6920
6921
6922
6923
6924
6925
6926
6927
6928
6929
6930
6931
6932
6933
6934
6935
6936
6937
6938
6939
6940
6941
6942
6943
6944
6945
6946
6947
6948
6949
6950
6951
6952
6953
6954
6955
6956
6957
6958
6959
6960
6961
6962
6963
6964
6965
6966
6967
6968
6969
6970
6971
6972
6973
6974
6975
6976
6977
6978
6979
6980
6981
6982
6983
6984
6985
6986
6987
6988
6989
6990
6991
6992
6993
6994
6995
6996
6997
6998
6999
7000
7001
7002
7003
7004
7005
7006
7007
7008
7009
7010
7011
7012
7013
7014
7015
7016
7017
7018
7019
7020
7021
7022
7023
7024
7025
7026
7027
7028
7029
7030
7031
7032
7033
7034
7035
7036
7037
7038
7039
7040
7041
7042
7043
7044
7045
7046
7047
7048
7049
7050
7051
7052
7053
7054
7055
7056
7057
7058
7059
7060
7061
7062
7063
7064
7065
7066
7067
7068
7069
7070
7071
7072
7073
7074
7075
7076
7077
7078
7079
7080
7081
7082
7083
7084
7085
7086
7087
7088
7089
7090
7091
7092
7093
7094
7095
7096
7097
7098
7099
7100
7101
7102
7103
7104
7105
7106
7107
7108
7109
7110
7111
7112
7113
7114
7115
7116
7117
7118
7119
7120
7121
7122
7123
7124
7125
7126
7127
7128
7129
7130
7131
7132
7133
7134
7135
7136
7137
7138
7139
7140
7141
7142
7143
7144
7145
7146
7147
7148
7149
7150
7151
7152
7153
7154
7155
7156
7157
7158
7159
7160
7161
7162
7163
7164
7165
7166
7167
7168
7169
7170
7171
7172
7173
7174
7175
7176
7177
7178
7179
7180
7181
7182
7183
7184
7185
7186
7187
7188
7189
7190
7191
7192
7193
7194
7195
7196
7197
7198
7199
7200
7201
7202
7203
7204
7205
7206
7207
7208
7209
7210
7211
7212
7213
7214
7215
7216
7217
7218
7219
7220
7221
7222
7223
7224
7225
7226
7227
7228
7229
7230
7231
7232
7233
7234
7235
7236
7237
7238
7239
7240
7241
7242
7243
7244
7245
7246
7247
7248
7249
7250
7251
7252
7253
7254
7255
7256
7257
7258
7259
7260
7261
7262
7263
7264
7265
7266
7267
7268
7269
7270
7271
7272
7273
7274
7275
7276
7277
7278
7279
7280
7281
7282
7283
7284
7285
7286
7287
7288
7289
7290
7291
7292
7293
7294
7295
7296
7297
7298
7299
7300
7301
7302
7303
7304
7305
7306
7307
7308
7309
7310
7311
7312
7313
7314
7315
7316
7317
7318
7319
7320
7321
7322
7323
7324
7325
7326
7327
7328
7329
7330
7331
7332
7333
7334
7335
7336
7337
7338
7339
7340
7341
7342
7343
7344
7345
7346
7347
7348
7349
7350
7351
7352
7353
7354
7355
7356
7357
7358
7359
7360
7361
7362
7363
7364
7365
7366
7367
7368
7369
7370
7371
7372
7373
7374
7375
7376
7377
7378
7379
7380
7381
7382
7383
7384
7385
7386
7387
7388
7389
7390
7391
7392
7393
7394
7395
7396
7397
7398
7399
7400
7401
7402
7403
7404
7405
7406
7407
7408
7409
7410
7411
7412
7413
7414
7415
7416
7417
7418
7419
7420
7421
7422
7423
7424
7425
7426
7427
7428
7429
7430
7431
7432
7433
7434
7435
7436
7437
7438
7439
7440
7441
7442
7443
7444
7445
7446
7447
7448
7449
7450
7451
7452
7453
7454
7455
7456
7457
7458
7459
7460
7461
7462
7463
7464
7465
7466
7467
7468
7469
7470
7471
7472
7473
7474
7475
7476
7477
7478
7479
7480
7481
7482
7483
7484
7485
7486
7487
7488
7489
7490
7491
7492
7493
7494
7495
7496
7497
7498
7499
7500
7501
7502
7503
7504
7505
7506
7507
7508
7509
7510
7511
7512
7513
7514
7515
7516
7517
7518
7519
7520
7521
7522
7523
7524
7525
7526
7527
7528
7529
7530
7531
7532
7533
7534
7535
7536
7537
7538
7539
7540
7541
7542
7543
7544
7545
7546
7547
7548
7549
7550
7551
7552
7553
7554
7555
7556
7557
7558
7559
7560
7561
7562
7563
7564
7565
7566
7567
7568
7569
7570
7571
7572
7573
7574
7575
7576
7577
7578
7579
7580
7581
7582
7583
7584
7585
7586
7587
7588
7589
7590
7591
7592
7593
7594
7595
7596
7597
7598
7599
7600
7601
7602
7603
7604
7605
7606
7607
7608
7609
7610
7611
7612
7613
7614
7615
7616
7617
7618
7619
7620
7621
7622
7623
7624
7625
7626
7627
7628
7629
7630
7631
7632
7633
7634
7635
7636
7637
7638
7639
7640
7641
7642
7643
7644
7645
7646
7647
7648
7649
7650
7651
7652
7653
7654
7655
7656
7657
7658
7659
7660
7661
7662
7663
7664
7665
7666
7667
7668
7669
7670
7671
7672
7673
7674
7675
7676
7677
7678
7679
7680
7681
7682
7683
7684
7685
7686
7687
7688
7689
7690
7691
7692
7693
7694
7695
7696
7697
7698
7699
7700
7701
7702
7703
7704
7705
7706
7707
7708
7709
7710
7711
7712
7713
7714
7715
7716
7717
7718
7719
7720
7721
7722
7723
7724
7725
7726
7727
7728
7729
7730
7731
7732
7733
7734
7735
7736
7737
7738
7739
7740
7741
7742
7743
7744
7745
7746
7747
7748
7749
7750
7751
7752
7753
7754
7755
7756
7757
7758
7759
7760
7761
7762
7763
7764
7765
7766
7767
7768
7769
7770
7771
7772
7773
7774
7775
7776
7777
7778
7779
7780
7781
7782
7783
7784
7785
7786
7787
7788
7789
7790
7791
7792
7793
7794
7795
7796
7797
7798
7799
7800
7801
7802
7803
7804
7805
7806
7807
7808
7809
7810
7811
7812
7813
7814
7815
7816
7817
7818
7819
7820
7821
7822
7823
7824
7825
7826
7827
7828
7829
7830
7831
7832
7833
7834
7835
7836
7837
7838
7839
7840
7841
7842
7843
7844
7845
7846
7847
7848
7849
7850
7851
7852
7853
7854
7855
7856
7857
7858
7859
7860
7861
7862
7863
7864
7865
7866
7867
7868
7869
7870
7871
7872
7873
7874
7875
7876
7877
7878
7879
7880
7881
7882
7883
7884
7885
7886
7887
7888
7889
7890
7891
7892
7893
7894
7895
7896
7897
7898
7899
7900
7901
7902
7903
7904
7905
7906
7907
7908
7909
7910
7911
7912
7913
7914
7915
7916
7917
7918
7919
7920
7921
7922
7923
7924
7925
7926
7927
7928
7929
7930
7931
7932
7933
7934
7935
7936
7937
7938
7939
7940
7941
7942
7943
7944
7945
7946
7947
7948
7949
7950
7951
7952
7953
7954
7955
7956
7957
7958
7959
7960
7961
7962
7963
7964
7965
7966
7967
7968
7969
7970
7971
7972
7973
7974
7975
7976
7977
7978
7979
7980
7981
7982
7983
7984
7985
7986
7987
7988
7989
7990
7991
7992
7993
7994
7995
7996
7997
7998
7999
8000
8001
8002
8003
8004
8005
8006
8007
8008
8009
8010
8011
8012
8013
8014
8015
8016
8017
8018
8019
8020
8021
8022
8023
8024
8025
8026
8027
8028
8029
8030
8031
8032
8033
8034
8035
8036
8037
8038
8039
8040
8041
8042
8043
8044
8045
8046
8047
8048
8049
8050
8051
8052
8053
8054
8055
8056
8057
8058
8059
8060
8061
8062
8063
8064
8065
8066
8067
8068
8069
8070
8071
8072
8073
8074
8075
8076
8077
8078
8079
8080
8081
8082
8083
8084
8085
8086
8087
8088
8089
8090
8091
8092
8093
8094
8095
8096
8097
8098
8099
8100
8101
8102
8103
8104
8105
8106
8107
8108
8109
8110
8111
8112
8113
8114
8115
8116
8117
8118
8119
8120
8121
8122
8123
8124
8125
8126
8127
8128
8129
8130
8131
8132
8133
8134
8135
8136
8137
8138
8139
8140
8141
8142
8143
8144
8145
8146
8147
8148
8149
8150
8151
8152
8153
8154
8155
8156
8157
8158
8159
8160
8161
8162
8163
8164
8165
8166
8167
8168
8169
8170
8171
8172
8173
8174
8175
8176
8177
8178
8179
8180
8181
8182
8183
8184
8185
8186
8187
8188
8189
8190
8191
8192
8193
8194
8195
8196
8197
8198
8199
8200
8201
8202
8203
8204
8205
8206
8207
8208
8209
8210
8211
8212
8213
8214
8215
8216
8217
8218
8219
8220
8221
8222
8223
8224
8225
8226
8227
8228
8229
8230
8231
8232
8233
8234
8235
8236
8237
8238
8239
8240
8241
8242
8243
8244
8245
8246
8247
8248
8249
8250
8251
8252
8253
8254
8255
8256
8257
8258
8259
8260
8261
8262
8263
8264
8265
8266
8267
8268
8269
8270
8271
8272
8273
8274
8275
8276
8277
8278
8279
8280
8281
8282
8283
8284
8285
8286
8287
8288
8289
8290
8291
8292
8293
8294
8295
8296
8297
8298
8299
8300
8301
8302
8303
8304
8305
8306
8307
8308
8309
8310
8311
8312
8313
8314
8315
8316
8317
8318
8319
8320
8321
8322
8323
8324
8325
8326
8327
8328
8329
8330
8331
8332
8333
8334
8335
8336
8337
8338
8339
8340
8341
8342
8343
8344
8345
8346
8347
8348
8349
8350
8351
8352
8353
8354
8355
8356
8357
8358
8359
8360
8361
8362
8363
8364
8365
8366
8367
8368
8369
8370
8371
8372
8373
8374
8375
8376
8377
8378
8379
8380
8381
8382
8383
8384
8385
8386
8387
8388
8389
8390
8391
8392
8393
8394
8395
8396
8397
8398
8399
8400
8401
8402
8403
8404
8405
8406
8407
8408
8409
8410
8411
8412
8413
8414
8415
8416
8417
8418
8419
8420
8421
8422
8423
8424
8425
8426
8427
8428
8429
8430
8431
8432
8433
8434
8435
8436
8437
8438
8439
8440
8441
8442
8443
8444
8445
8446
8447
8448
8449
8450
8451
8452
8453
8454
8455
8456
8457
8458
8459
8460
8461
8462
8463
8464
8465
8466
8467
8468
8469
8470
8471
8472
8473
8474
8475
8476
8477
8478
8479
8480
8481
8482
8483
8484
8485
8486
8487
8488
8489
8490
8491
8492
8493
8494
8495
8496
8497
8498
8499
8500
8501
8502
8503
8504
8505
8506
8507
8508
8509
8510
8511
8512
8513
8514
8515
8516
8517
8518
8519
8520
8521
8522
8523
8524
8525
8526
8527
8528
8529
8530
8531
8532
8533
8534
8535
8536
8537
8538
8539
8540
8541
8542
8543
8544
8545
8546
8547
8548
8549
8550
8551
8552
8553
8554
8555
8556
8557
8558
8559
8560
8561
8562
8563
8564
8565
8566
8567
8568
8569
8570
8571
8572
8573
8574
8575
8576
8577
8578
8579
8580
8581
8582
8583
8584
8585
8586
8587
8588
8589
8590
8591
8592
8593
8594
8595
8596
8597
8598
8599
8600
8601
8602
8603
8604
8605
8606
8607
8608
8609
8610
8611
8612
8613
8614
8615
8616
8617
8618
8619
8620
8621
8622
8623
8624
8625
8626
8627
8628
8629
8630
8631
8632
8633
8634
8635
8636
8637
8638
8639
8640
8641
8642
8643
8644
8645
8646
8647
8648
8649
8650
8651
8652
8653
8654
8655
8656
8657
8658
8659
8660
8661
8662
8663
8664
8665
8666
8667
8668
8669
8670
8671
8672
8673
8674
8675
8676
8677
8678
8679
8680
8681
8682
8683
8684
8685
8686
8687
8688
8689
8690
8691
8692
8693
8694
8695
8696
8697
8698
8699
8700
8701
8702
8703
8704
8705
8706
8707
8708
8709
8710
8711
8712
8713
8714
8715
8716
8717
8718
8719
8720
8721
8722
8723
8724
8725
8726
8727
8728
8729
8730
8731
8732
8733
8734
8735
8736
8737
8738
8739
8740
8741
8742
8743
8744
8745
8746
8747
8748
8749
8750
8751
8752
8753
8754
8755
8756
8757
8758
8759
8760
8761
8762
8763
8764
8765
8766
8767
8768
8769
8770
8771
8772
8773
8774
8775
8776
8777
8778
8779
8780
8781
8782
8783
8784
8785
8786
8787
8788
8789
8790
8791
8792
8793
8794
8795
8796
8797
8798
8799
8800
8801
8802
8803
8804
8805
8806
8807
8808
8809
8810
8811
8812
8813
8814
8815
8816
8817
8818
8819
8820
8821
8822
8823
8824
8825
8826
8827
8828
8829
8830
8831
8832
8833
8834
8835
8836
8837
8838
8839
8840
8841
8842
8843
8844
8845
8846
8847
8848
8849
8850
8851
8852
8853
8854
8855
8856
8857
8858
8859
8860
8861
8862
8863
8864
8865
8866
8867
8868
8869
8870
8871
8872
8873
8874
8875
8876
8877
8878
8879
8880
8881
8882
8883
8884
8885
8886
8887
8888
8889
8890
8891
8892
8893
8894
8895
8896
8897
8898
8899
8900
8901
8902
8903
8904
8905
8906
8907
8908
8909
8910
8911
8912
8913
8914
8915
8916
8917
8918
8919
8920
8921
8922
8923
8924
8925
8926
8927
8928
8929
8930
8931
8932
8933
8934
8935
8936
8937
8938
8939
8940
8941
8942
8943
8944
8945
8946
8947
8948
8949
8950
8951
8952
8953
8954
8955
8956
8957
8958
8959
8960
8961
8962
8963
8964
8965
8966
8967
8968
8969
8970
8971
8972
8973
8974
8975
8976
8977
8978
8979
8980
8981
8982
8983
8984
8985
8986
8987
8988
8989
8990
8991
8992
8993
8994
8995
8996
8997
8998
8999
9000
9001
9002
9003
9004
9005
9006
9007
9008
9009
9010
9011
9012
9013
9014
9015
9016
9017
9018
9019
9020
9021
9022
9023
9024
9025
9026
9027
9028
9029
9030
9031
9032
9033
9034
9035
9036
9037
9038
9039
9040
9041
9042
9043
9044
9045
9046
9047
9048
9049
9050
9051
9052
9053
9054
9055
9056
9057
9058
9059
9060
9061
9062
9063
9064
9065
9066
9067
9068
9069
9070
9071
9072
9073
9074
9075
9076
9077
9078
9079
9080
9081
9082
9083
9084
9085
9086
9087
9088
9089
9090
9091
9092
9093
9094
9095
9096
9097
9098
9099
9100
9101
9102
9103
9104
9105
9106
9107
9108
9109
9110
9111
9112
9113
9114
9115
9116
9117
9118
9119
9120
9121
9122
9123
9124
9125
9126
9127
9128
9129
9130
9131
9132
9133
9134
9135
9136
9137
9138
9139
9140
9141
9142
9143
9144
9145
9146
9147
9148
9149
9150
9151
9152
9153
9154
9155
9156
9157
9158
9159
9160
9161
9162
9163
9164
9165
9166
9167
9168
9169
9170
9171
9172
9173
9174
9175
9176
9177
9178
9179
9180
9181
9182
9183
9184
9185
9186
9187
9188
9189
9190
9191
9192
9193
9194
9195
9196
9197
9198
9199
9200
9201
9202
9203
9204
9205
9206
9207
9208
9209
9210
9211
9212
9213
9214
9215
9216
9217
9218
9219
9220
9221
9222
9223
9224
9225
9226
9227
9228
9229
9230
9231
9232
9233
9234
9235
9236
9237
9238
9239
9240
9241
9242
9243
9244
9245
9246
9247
9248
9249
9250
9251
9252
9253
9254
9255
9256
9257
9258
9259
9260
9261
9262
9263
9264
9265
9266
9267
9268
9269
9270
9271
9272
9273
9274
9275
9276
9277
9278
9279
9280
9281
9282
9283
9284
9285
9286
9287
9288
9289
9290
9291
9292
9293
9294
9295
9296
9297
9298
9299
9300
9301
9302
9303
9304
9305
9306
9307
9308
9309
9310
9311
9312
9313
9314
9315
9316
9317
9318
9319
9320
9321
9322
9323
9324
9325
9326
9327
9328
9329
9330
9331
9332
9333
9334
9335
9336
9337
9338
9339
9340
9341
9342
9343
9344
9345
9346
9347
9348
9349
9350
9351
9352
9353
9354
9355
9356
9357
9358
9359
9360
9361
9362
9363
9364
9365
9366
9367
9368
9369
9370
9371
9372
9373
9374
9375
9376
9377
9378
9379
9380
9381
9382
9383
9384
9385
9386
9387
9388
9389
9390
9391
9392
9393
9394
9395
9396
9397
9398
9399
9400
9401
9402
9403
9404
9405
9406
9407
9408
9409
9410
9411
9412
9413
9414
9415
9416
9417
9418
9419
9420
9421
9422
9423
9424
9425
9426
9427
9428
9429
9430
9431
9432
9433
9434
9435
9436
9437
9438
9439
9440
9441
9442
9443
9444
9445
9446
9447
9448
9449
9450
9451
9452
9453
9454
9455
9456
9457
9458
9459
9460
9461
9462
9463
9464
9465
9466
9467
9468
9469
9470
9471
9472
9473
9474
9475
9476
9477
9478
9479
9480
9481
9482
9483
9484
9485
9486
9487
9488
9489
9490
9491
9492
9493
9494
9495
9496
9497
9498
9499
9500
9501
9502
9503
9504
9505
9506
9507
9508
9509
9510
9511
9512
9513
9514
9515
9516
9517
9518
9519
9520
9521
9522
9523
9524
9525
9526
9527
9528
9529
9530
9531
9532
9533
9534
9535
9536
9537
9538
9539
9540
9541
9542
9543
9544
9545
9546
9547
9548
9549
9550
9551
9552
9553
9554
9555
9556
9557
9558
9559
9560
9561
9562
9563
9564
9565
9566
9567
9568
9569
9570
9571
9572
9573
9574
9575
9576
9577
9578
9579
9580
9581
9582
9583
9584
9585
9586
9587
9588
9589
9590
9591
9592
9593
9594
9595
9596
9597
9598
9599
9600
9601
9602
9603
9604
9605
9606
9607
9608
9609
9610
9611
9612
9613
9614
9615
9616
9617
9618
9619
9620
9621
9622
9623
9624
9625
9626
9627
9628
9629
9630
9631
9632
9633
9634
9635
9636
9637
9638
9639
9640
9641
9642
9643
9644
9645
9646
9647
9648
9649
9650
9651
9652
9653
9654
9655
9656
9657
9658
9659
9660
9661
9662
9663
9664
9665
9666
9667
9668
9669
9670
9671
9672
9673
9674
9675
9676
9677
9678
9679
9680
9681
9682
9683
9684
9685
9686
9687
9688
9689
9690
9691
9692
9693
9694
9695
9696
9697
9698
9699
9700
9701
9702
9703
9704
9705
9706
9707
9708
9709
9710
9711
9712
9713
9714
9715
9716
9717
9718
9719
9720
9721
9722
9723
9724
9725
9726
9727
9728
9729
9730
9731
9732
9733
9734
9735
9736
9737
9738
9739
9740
9741
9742
9743
9744
9745
9746
9747
9748
9749
9750
9751
9752
9753
9754
9755
9756
9757
9758
9759
9760
9761
9762
9763
9764
9765
9766
9767
9768
9769
9770
9771
9772
9773
9774
9775
9776
9777
9778
9779
9780
9781
9782
9783
9784
9785
9786
9787
9788
9789
9790
9791
9792
9793
9794
9795
9796
9797
9798
9799
9800
9801
9802
9803
9804
9805
9806
9807
9808
9809
9810
9811
9812
9813
9814
9815
9816
9817
9818
9819
9820
9821
9822
9823
9824
9825
9826
9827
9828
9829
9830
9831
9832
9833
9834
9835
9836
9837
9838
9839
9840
9841
9842
9843
9844
9845
9846
9847
9848
9849
9850
9851
9852
9853
9854
9855
9856
9857
9858
9859
9860
9861
9862
9863
9864
9865
9866
9867
9868
9869
9870
9871
9872
9873
9874
9875
9876
9877
9878
9879
9880
9881
9882
9883
9884
9885
9886
9887
9888
9889
9890
9891
9892
9893
9894
9895
9896
9897
9898
9899
9900
9901
9902
9903
9904
9905
9906
9907
9908
9909
9910
9911
9912
9913
9914
9915
9916
9917
9918
9919
9920
9921
9922
9923
9924
9925
9926
9927
9928
9929
9930
9931
9932
9933
9934
9935
9936
9937
9938
9939
9940
9941
9942
9943
9944
9945
9946
9947
9948
9949
9950
9951
9952
9953
9954
9955
9956
9957
9958
9959
9960
9961
9962
9963
9964
9965
9966
9967
9968
9969
9970
9971
9972
9973
9974
9975
9976
9977
9978
9979
9980
9981
9982
9983
9984
9985
9986
9987
9988
9989
9990
9991
9992
9993
9994
9995
9996
9997
9998
9999
10000
10001
10002
10003
10004
10005
10006
10007
10008
10009
10010
10011
10012
10013
10014
10015
10016
10017
10018
10019
10020
10021
10022
10023
10024
10025
10026
10027
10028
10029
10030
10031
10032
10033
10034
10035
10036
10037
10038
10039
10040
10041
10042
10043
10044
10045
10046
10047
10048
10049
10050
10051
10052
10053
10054
10055
10056
10057
10058
10059
10060
10061
10062
10063
10064
10065
10066
10067
10068
10069
10070
10071
10072
10073
10074
10075
10076
10077
10078
10079
10080
10081
10082
10083
10084
10085
10086
10087
10088
10089
10090
10091
10092
10093
10094
10095
10096
10097
10098
10099
10100
10101
10102
10103
10104
10105
10106
10107
10108
10109
10110
10111
10112
10113
10114
10115
10116
10117
10118
10119
10120
10121
10122
10123
10124
10125
10126
10127
10128
10129
10130
10131
10132
10133
10134
10135
10136
10137
10138
10139
10140
10141
10142
10143
10144
10145
10146
10147
10148
10149
10150
10151
10152
10153
10154
10155
10156
10157
10158
10159
10160
10161
10162
10163
10164
10165
10166
10167
10168
10169
10170
10171
10172
10173
10174
10175
10176
10177
10178
10179
10180
10181
10182
10183
10184
10185
10186
10187
10188
10189
10190
10191
10192
10193
10194
10195
10196
10197
10198
10199
10200
10201
10202
10203
10204
10205
10206
10207
10208
10209
10210
10211
10212
10213
10214
10215
10216
10217
10218
10219
10220
10221
10222
10223
10224
10225
10226
10227
10228
10229
10230
10231
10232
10233
10234
10235
10236
10237
10238
10239
10240
10241
10242
10243
10244
10245
10246
10247
10248
10249
10250
10251
10252
10253
10254
10255
10256
10257
10258
10259
10260
10261
10262
10263
10264
10265
10266
10267
10268
10269
10270
10271
10272
10273
10274
10275
10276
10277
10278
10279
10280
10281
10282
10283
10284
10285
10286
10287
10288
10289
10290
10291
10292
10293
10294
10295
10296
10297
10298
10299
10300
10301
10302
10303
10304
10305
10306
10307
10308
10309
10310
10311
10312
10313
10314
10315
10316
10317
10318
10319
10320
10321
10322
10323
10324
10325
10326
10327
10328
10329
10330
10331
10332
10333
10334
10335
10336
10337
10338
10339
10340
10341
10342
10343
10344
10345
10346
10347
10348
10349
10350
10351
10352
10353
10354
10355
10356
10357
10358
10359
10360
10361
10362
10363
10364
10365
10366
10367
10368
10369
10370
10371
10372
10373
10374
10375
10376
10377
10378
10379
10380
10381
10382
10383
10384
10385
10386
10387
10388
10389
10390
10391
10392
10393
10394
10395
10396
10397
10398
10399
10400
10401
10402
10403
10404
10405
10406
10407
10408
10409
10410
10411
10412
10413
10414
10415
10416
10417
10418
10419
10420
10421
10422
10423
10424
10425
10426
10427
10428
10429
10430
10431
10432
10433
10434
10435
10436
10437
10438
10439
10440
10441
10442
10443
10444
10445
10446
10447
10448
10449
10450
10451
10452
10453
10454
10455
10456
10457
10458
10459
10460
10461
10462
10463
10464
10465
10466
10467
10468
10469
10470
10471
10472
10473
10474
10475
10476
10477
10478
10479
10480
10481
10482
10483
10484
10485
10486
10487
10488
10489
10490
10491
10492
10493
10494
10495
10496
10497
10498
10499
10500
10501
10502
10503
10504
10505
10506
10507
10508
10509
10510
10511
10512
10513
10514
10515
10516
10517
10518
10519
10520
10521
10522
10523
10524
10525
10526
10527
10528
10529
10530
10531
10532
10533
10534
10535
10536
10537
10538
10539
10540
10541
10542
10543
10544
10545
10546
10547
10548
10549
10550
10551
10552
10553
10554
10555
10556
10557
10558
10559
10560
10561
10562
10563
10564
10565
10566
10567
10568
10569
10570
10571
10572
10573
10574
10575
10576
10577
10578
10579
10580
10581
10582
10583
10584
10585
10586
10587
10588
10589
10590
10591
10592
10593
10594
10595
10596
10597
10598
10599
10600
10601
10602
10603
10604
10605
10606
10607
10608
10609
10610
10611
10612
10613
10614
10615
10616
10617
10618
10619
10620
10621
10622
10623
10624
10625
10626
10627
10628
10629
10630
10631
10632
10633
10634
10635
10636
10637
10638
10639
10640
10641
10642
10643
10644
10645
10646
10647
10648
10649
10650
10651
10652
10653
10654
10655
10656
10657
10658
10659
10660
10661
10662
10663
10664
10665
10666
10667
10668
10669
10670
10671
10672
10673
10674
10675
10676
10677
10678
10679
10680
10681
10682
10683
10684
10685
10686
10687
10688
10689
10690
10691
10692
10693
10694
10695
10696
10697
10698
10699
10700
10701
10702
10703
10704
10705
10706
10707
10708
10709
10710
10711
10712
10713
10714
10715
10716
10717
10718
10719
10720
10721
10722
10723
10724
10725
10726
10727
10728
10729
10730
10731
10732
10733
10734
10735
10736
10737
10738
10739
10740
10741
10742
10743
10744
10745
10746
10747
10748
10749
10750
10751
10752
10753
10754
10755
10756
10757
10758
10759
10760
10761
10762
10763
10764
10765
10766
10767
10768
10769
10770
10771
10772
10773
10774
10775
10776
10777
10778
10779
10780
10781
10782
10783
10784
10785
10786
10787
10788
10789
10790
10791
10792
10793
10794
10795
10796
10797
10798
10799
10800
10801
10802
10803
10804
10805
10806
10807
10808
10809
10810
10811
10812
10813
10814
10815
10816
10817
10818
10819
10820
10821
10822
10823
10824
10825
10826
10827
10828
10829
10830
10831
10832
10833
10834
10835
10836
10837
10838
10839
10840
10841
10842
10843
10844
10845
10846
10847
10848
10849
10850
10851
10852
10853
10854
10855
10856
10857
10858
10859
10860
10861
10862
10863
10864
10865
10866
10867
10868
10869
10870
10871
10872
10873
10874
10875
10876
10877
10878
10879
10880
10881
10882
10883
10884
10885
10886
10887
10888
10889
10890
10891
10892
10893
10894
10895
10896
10897
10898
10899
10900
10901
10902
10903
10904
10905
10906
10907
10908
10909
10910
10911
10912
10913
10914
10915
10916
10917
10918
10919
10920
10921
10922
10923
10924
10925
10926
10927
10928
10929
10930
10931
10932
10933
10934
10935
10936
10937
10938
10939
10940
10941
10942
10943
10944
10945
10946
10947
10948
10949
10950
10951
10952
10953
10954
10955
10956
10957
10958
10959
10960
10961
10962
10963
10964
10965
10966
10967
10968
10969
10970
10971
10972
10973
10974
10975
10976
10977
10978
10979
10980
10981
10982
10983
10984
10985
10986
10987
10988
10989
10990
10991
10992
10993
10994
10995
10996
10997
10998
10999
11000
11001
11002
11003
11004
11005
11006
11007
11008
11009
11010
11011
11012
11013
11014
11015
11016
11017
11018
11019
11020
11021
11022
11023
11024
11025
11026
11027
11028
11029
11030
11031
11032
11033
11034
11035
11036
11037
11038
11039
11040
11041
11042
11043
11044
11045
11046
11047
11048
11049
11050
11051
11052
11053
11054
11055
11056
11057
11058
11059
11060
11061
11062
11063
11064
11065
11066
11067
11068
11069
11070
11071
11072
11073
11074
11075
11076
11077
11078
11079
11080
11081
11082
11083
11084
11085
11086
11087
11088
11089
11090
11091
11092
11093
11094
11095
11096
11097
11098
11099
11100
11101
11102
11103
11104
11105
11106
11107
11108
11109
11110
11111
11112
11113
11114
11115
11116
11117
11118
11119
11120
11121
11122
11123
11124
11125
11126
11127
11128
11129
11130
11131
11132
11133
11134
11135
11136
11137
11138
11139
11140
11141
11142
11143
11144
11145
11146
11147
11148
11149
11150
11151
11152
11153
11154
11155
11156
11157
11158
11159
11160
11161
11162
11163
11164
11165
11166
11167
11168
11169
11170
11171
11172
11173
11174
11175
11176
11177
11178
11179
11180
11181
11182
11183
11184
11185
11186
11187
11188
11189
11190
11191
11192
11193
11194
11195
11196
11197
11198
11199
11200
11201
11202
11203
11204
11205
11206
11207
11208
11209
11210
11211
11212
11213
11214
11215
11216
11217
11218
11219
11220
11221
11222
11223
11224
11225
11226
11227
11228
11229
11230
11231
11232
11233
11234
11235
11236
11237
11238
11239
11240
11241
11242
11243
11244
11245
11246
11247
11248
11249
11250
11251
11252
11253
11254
11255
11256
11257
11258
11259
11260
11261
11262
11263
11264
11265
11266
11267
11268
11269
11270
11271
11272
11273
11274
11275
11276
11277
11278
11279
11280
11281
11282
11283
11284
11285
11286
11287
11288
11289
11290
11291
11292
11293
11294
11295
11296
11297
11298
11299
11300
11301
11302
11303
11304
11305
11306
11307
11308
11309
11310
11311
11312
11313
11314
11315
11316
11317
11318
11319
11320
11321
11322
11323
11324
11325
11326
11327
11328
11329
11330
11331
11332
11333
11334
11335
11336
11337
11338
11339
11340
11341
11342
11343
11344
11345
11346
11347
11348
11349
11350
11351
11352
11353
11354
11355
11356
11357
11358
11359
11360
11361
11362
11363
11364
11365
11366
11367
11368
11369
11370
11371
11372
11373
11374
11375
11376
11377
11378
11379
11380
11381
11382
11383
11384
11385
11386
11387
11388
11389
11390
11391
11392
11393
11394
11395
11396
11397
11398
11399
11400
11401
11402
11403
11404
11405
11406
11407
11408
11409
11410
11411
11412
11413
11414
11415
11416
11417
11418
11419
11420
11421
11422
11423
11424
11425
11426
11427
11428
11429
11430
11431
11432
11433
11434
11435
11436
11437
11438
11439
11440
11441
11442
11443
11444
11445
11446
11447
11448
11449
11450
11451
11452
11453
11454
11455
11456
11457
11458
11459
11460
11461
11462
11463
11464
11465
11466
11467
11468
11469
11470
11471
11472
11473
11474
11475
11476
11477
11478
11479
11480
11481
11482
11483
11484
11485
11486
11487
11488
11489
11490
11491
11492
11493
11494
11495
11496
11497
11498
11499
11500
11501
11502
11503
11504
11505
11506
11507
11508
11509
11510
11511
11512
11513
11514
11515
11516
11517
11518
11519
11520
11521
11522
11523
11524
11525
11526
11527
11528
11529
11530
11531
11532
11533
11534
11535
11536
11537
11538
11539
11540
11541
11542
11543
11544
11545
11546
11547
11548
11549
11550
11551
11552
11553
11554
11555
11556
11557
11558
11559
11560
11561
11562
11563
11564
11565
11566
11567
11568
11569
11570
11571
11572
11573
11574
11575
11576
11577
11578
11579
11580
11581
11582
11583
11584
11585
11586
11587
11588
11589
11590
11591
11592
11593
11594
11595
11596
11597
11598
11599
11600
11601
11602
11603
11604
11605
11606
11607
11608
11609
11610
11611
11612
11613
11614
11615
11616
11617
11618
11619
11620
11621
11622
11623
11624
11625
11626
11627
11628
11629
11630
11631
11632
11633
11634
11635
11636
11637
11638
11639
11640
11641
11642
11643
11644
11645
11646
11647
11648
11649
11650
11651
11652
11653
11654
11655
11656
11657
11658
11659
11660
11661
11662
11663
11664
11665
11666
11667
11668
11669
11670
11671
11672
11673
11674
11675
11676
11677
11678
11679
11680
11681
11682
11683
11684
11685
11686
11687
11688
11689
11690
11691
11692
11693
11694
11695
11696
11697
11698
11699
11700
11701
11702
11703
11704
11705
11706
11707
11708
11709
11710
11711
11712
11713
11714
11715
11716
11717
11718
11719
11720
11721
11722
11723
11724
11725
11726
11727
11728
11729
11730
11731
11732
11733
11734
11735
11736
11737
11738
11739
11740
11741
11742
11743
11744
11745
11746
11747
11748
11749
11750
11751
11752
11753
11754
11755
11756
11757
11758
11759
11760
11761
11762
11763
11764
11765
11766
11767
11768
11769
11770
11771
11772
11773
11774
11775
11776
11777
11778
11779
11780
11781
11782
11783
11784
11785
11786
11787
11788
11789
11790
11791
11792
11793
11794
11795
11796
11797
11798
11799
11800
11801
11802
11803
11804
11805
11806
11807
11808
11809
11810
11811
11812
11813
11814
11815
11816
11817
11818
11819
11820
11821
11822
11823
11824
11825
11826
11827
11828
11829
11830
11831
11832
11833
11834
11835
11836
11837
11838
11839
11840
11841
11842
11843
11844
11845
11846
11847
11848
11849
11850
11851
11852
11853
11854
11855
11856
11857
11858
11859
11860
11861
11862
11863
11864
11865
11866
11867
11868
11869
11870
11871
11872
11873
11874
11875
11876
11877
11878
11879
11880
11881
11882
11883
11884
11885
11886
11887
11888
11889
11890
11891
11892
11893
11894
11895
11896
11897
11898
11899
11900
11901
11902
11903
11904
11905
11906
11907
11908
11909
11910
11911
11912
11913
11914
11915
11916
11917
11918
11919
11920
11921
11922
11923
11924
11925
11926
11927
11928
11929
11930
11931
11932
11933
11934
11935
11936
11937
11938
11939
11940
11941
11942
11943
11944
11945
11946
11947
11948
11949
11950
11951
11952
11953
11954
11955
11956
11957
11958
11959
11960
11961
11962
11963
11964
11965
11966
11967
11968
11969
11970
11971
11972
11973
11974
11975
11976
11977
11978
11979
11980
11981
11982
11983
11984
11985
11986
11987
11988
11989
11990
11991
11992
11993
11994
11995
11996
11997
11998
11999
12000
12001
12002
12003
12004
12005
12006
12007
12008
12009
12010
12011
12012
12013
12014
12015
12016
12017
12018
12019
12020
12021
12022
12023
12024
12025
12026
12027
12028
12029
12030
12031
12032
12033
12034
12035
12036
12037
12038
12039
12040
12041
12042
12043
12044
12045
12046
12047
12048
12049
12050
12051
12052
12053
12054
12055
12056
12057
12058
12059
12060
12061
12062
12063
12064
12065
12066
12067
12068
12069
12070
12071
12072
12073
12074
12075
12076
12077
12078
12079
12080
12081
12082
12083
12084
12085
12086
12087
12088
12089
12090
12091
12092
12093
12094
12095
12096
12097
12098
12099
12100
12101
12102
12103
12104
12105
12106
12107
12108
12109
12110
12111
12112
12113
12114
12115
12116
12117
12118
12119
12120
12121
12122
12123
12124
12125
12126
12127
12128
12129
12130
12131
12132
12133
12134
12135
12136
12137
12138
12139
12140
12141
12142
12143
12144
12145
12146
12147
12148
12149
12150
12151
12152
12153
12154
12155
12156
12157
12158
12159
12160
12161
12162
12163
12164
12165
12166
12167
12168
12169
12170
12171
12172
12173
12174
12175
12176
12177
12178
12179
12180
12181
12182
12183
12184
12185
12186
12187
12188
12189
12190
12191
12192
12193
12194
12195
12196
12197
12198
12199
12200
12201
12202
12203
12204
12205
12206
12207
12208
12209
12210
12211
12212
12213
12214
12215
12216
12217
12218
12219
12220
12221
12222
12223
12224
12225
12226
12227
12228
12229
12230
12231
12232
12233
12234
12235
12236
12237
12238
12239
12240
12241
12242
12243
12244
12245
12246
12247
12248
12249
12250
12251
12252
12253
12254
12255
12256
12257
12258
12259
12260
12261
12262
12263
12264
12265
12266
12267
12268
12269
12270
12271
12272
12273
12274
12275
12276
12277
12278
12279
12280
12281
12282
12283
12284
12285
12286
12287
12288
12289
12290
12291
12292
12293
12294
12295
12296
12297
12298
12299
12300
12301
12302
12303
12304
12305
12306
12307
12308
12309
12310
12311
12312
12313
12314
12315
12316
12317
12318
12319
12320
12321
12322
12323
12324
12325
12326
12327
12328
12329
12330
12331
12332
12333
12334
12335
12336
12337
12338
12339
12340
12341
12342
12343
12344
12345
12346
12347
12348
12349
12350
12351
12352
12353
12354
12355
12356
12357
12358
12359
12360
12361
12362
12363
12364
12365
12366
12367
12368
12369
12370
12371
12372
12373
12374
12375
12376
12377
12378
12379
12380
12381
12382
12383
12384
12385
12386
12387
12388
12389
12390
12391
12392
12393
12394
12395
12396
12397
12398
12399
12400
12401
12402
12403
12404
12405
12406
12407
12408
12409
12410
12411
12412
12413
12414
12415
12416
12417
12418
12419
12420
12421
12422
12423
12424
12425
12426
12427
12428
12429
12430
12431
12432
12433
12434
12435
12436
12437
12438
12439
12440
12441
12442
12443
12444
12445
12446
12447
12448
12449
12450
12451
12452
12453
12454
12455
12456
12457
12458
12459
12460
12461
12462
12463
12464
12465
12466
12467
12468
12469
12470
12471
12472
12473
12474
12475
12476
12477
12478
12479
12480
12481
12482
12483
12484
12485
12486
12487
12488
12489
12490
12491
12492
12493
12494
12495
12496
12497
12498
12499
12500
12501
12502
12503
12504
12505
12506
12507
12508
12509
12510
12511
12512
12513
12514
12515
12516
12517
12518
12519
12520
12521
12522
12523
12524
12525
12526
12527
12528
12529
12530
12531
12532
12533
12534
12535
12536
12537
12538
12539
12540
12541
12542
12543
12544
12545
12546
12547
12548
12549
12550
12551
12552
12553
12554
12555
12556
12557
12558
12559
12560
12561
12562
12563
12564
12565
12566
12567
12568
12569
12570
12571
12572
12573
12574
12575
12576
12577
12578
12579
12580
12581
12582
12583
12584
12585
12586
12587
12588
12589
12590
12591
12592
12593
12594
12595
12596
12597
12598
12599
12600
12601
12602
12603
12604
12605
12606
12607
12608
12609
12610
12611
12612
12613
12614
12615
12616
12617
12618
12619
12620
12621
12622
12623
12624
12625
12626
12627
12628
12629
12630
12631
12632
12633
12634
12635
12636
12637
12638
12639
12640
12641
12642
12643
12644
12645
12646
12647
12648
12649
12650
12651
12652
12653
12654
12655
12656
12657
12658
12659
12660
12661
12662
12663
12664
12665
12666
12667
12668
12669
12670
12671
12672
12673
12674
12675
12676
12677
12678
12679
12680
12681
12682
12683
12684
12685
12686
12687
12688
12689
12690
12691
12692
12693
12694
12695
12696
12697
12698
12699
12700
12701
12702
12703
12704
12705
12706
12707
12708
12709
12710
12711
12712
12713
12714
12715
12716
12717
12718
12719
12720
12721
12722
12723
12724
12725
12726
12727
12728
12729
12730
12731
12732
12733
12734
12735
12736
12737
12738
12739
12740
12741
12742
12743
12744
12745
12746
12747
12748
12749
12750
12751
12752
12753
12754
12755
12756
12757
12758
12759
12760
12761
12762
12763
12764
12765
12766
12767
12768
12769
12770
12771
12772
12773
12774
12775
12776
12777
12778
12779
12780
12781
12782
12783
12784
12785
12786
12787
12788
12789
12790
12791
12792
12793
12794
12795
12796
12797
12798
12799
12800
12801
12802
12803
12804
12805
12806
12807
12808
12809
12810
12811
12812
12813
12814
12815
12816
12817
12818
12819
12820
12821
12822
12823
12824
12825
12826
12827
12828
12829
12830
12831
12832
12833
12834
12835
12836
12837
12838
12839
12840
12841
12842
12843
12844
12845
12846
12847
12848
12849
12850
12851
12852
12853
12854
12855
12856
12857
12858
12859
12860
12861
12862
12863
12864
12865
12866
12867
12868
12869
12870
12871
12872
12873
12874
12875
12876
12877
12878
12879
12880
12881
12882
12883
12884
12885
12886
12887
12888
12889
12890
12891
12892
12893
12894
12895
12896
12897
12898
12899
12900
12901
12902
12903
12904
12905
12906
12907
12908
12909
12910
12911
12912
12913
12914
12915
12916
12917
12918
12919
12920
12921
12922
12923
12924
12925
12926
12927
12928
12929
12930
12931
12932
12933
12934
12935
12936
12937
12938
12939
12940
12941
12942
12943
12944
12945
12946
12947
12948
12949
12950
12951
12952
12953
12954
12955
12956
12957
12958
12959
12960
12961
12962
12963
12964
12965
12966
12967
12968
12969
12970
12971
12972
12973
12974
12975
12976
12977
12978
12979
12980
12981
12982
12983
12984
12985
12986
12987
12988
12989
12990
12991
12992
12993
12994
12995
12996
12997
12998
12999
13000
13001
13002
13003
13004
13005
13006
13007
13008
13009
13010
13011
13012
13013
13014
13015
13016
13017
13018
13019
13020
13021
13022
13023
13024
13025
13026
13027
13028
13029
13030
13031
13032
13033
13034
13035
13036
13037
13038
13039
13040
13041
13042
13043
13044
13045
13046
13047
13048
13049
13050
13051
13052
13053
13054
13055
13056
13057
13058
13059
13060
13061
13062
13063
13064
13065
13066
13067
13068
13069
13070
13071
13072
13073
13074
13075
13076
13077
13078
13079
13080
13081
13082
13083
13084
13085
13086
13087
13088
13089
13090
13091
13092
13093
13094
13095
13096
13097
13098
13099
13100
13101
13102
13103
13104
13105
13106
13107
13108
13109
13110
13111
13112
13113
13114
13115
13116
13117
13118
13119
13120
13121
13122
13123
13124
13125
13126
13127
13128
13129
13130
13131
13132
13133
13134
13135
13136
13137
13138
13139
13140
13141
13142
13143
13144
13145
13146
13147
13148
13149
13150
13151
13152
13153
13154
13155
13156
13157
13158
13159
13160
13161
13162
13163
13164
13165
13166
13167
13168
13169
13170
13171
13172
13173
13174
13175
13176
13177
13178
13179
13180
13181
13182
13183
13184
13185
13186
13187
13188
13189
13190
13191
13192
13193
13194
13195
13196
13197
13198
13199
13200
13201
13202
13203
13204
13205
13206
13207
13208
13209
13210
13211
13212
13213
13214
13215
13216
13217
13218
13219
13220
13221
13222
13223
13224
13225
13226
13227
13228
13229
13230
13231
13232
13233
13234
13235
13236
13237
13238
13239
13240
13241
13242
13243
13244
13245
13246
13247
13248
13249
13250
13251
13252
13253
13254
13255
13256
13257
13258
13259
13260
13261
13262
13263
13264
13265
13266
13267
13268
13269
13270
13271
13272
13273
13274
13275
13276
13277
13278
13279
13280
13281
13282
13283
13284
13285
13286
13287
13288
13289
13290
13291
13292
13293
13294
13295
13296
13297
13298
13299
13300
13301
13302
13303
13304
13305
13306
13307
13308
13309
13310
13311
13312
13313
13314
13315
13316
13317
13318
13319
13320
13321
13322
13323
13324
13325
13326
13327
13328
13329
13330
13331
13332
13333
13334
13335
13336
13337
13338
13339
13340
13341
13342
13343
13344
13345
13346
13347
13348
13349
13350
13351
13352
13353
13354
13355
13356
13357
13358
13359
13360
13361
13362
13363
13364
13365
13366
13367
13368
13369
13370
13371
13372
13373
13374
13375
13376
13377
13378
13379
13380
13381
13382
13383
13384
13385
13386
13387
13388
13389
13390
13391
13392
13393
13394
13395
13396
13397
13398
13399
13400
13401
13402
13403
13404
13405
13406
13407
13408
13409
13410
13411
13412
13413
13414
13415
13416
13417
13418
13419
13420
13421
13422
13423
13424
13425
13426
13427
13428
13429
13430
13431
13432
13433
13434
13435
13436
13437
13438
13439
13440
13441
13442
13443
13444
13445
13446
13447
13448
13449
13450
13451
13452
13453
13454
13455
13456
13457
13458
13459
13460
13461
13462
13463
13464
13465
13466
13467
13468
13469
13470
13471
13472
13473
13474
13475
13476
13477
13478
13479
13480
13481
13482
13483
13484
13485
13486
13487
13488
13489
13490
13491
13492
13493
13494
13495
13496
13497
13498
13499
13500
13501
13502
13503
13504
13505
13506
13507
13508
13509
13510
13511
13512
13513
13514
13515
13516
13517
13518
13519
13520
13521
13522
13523
13524
13525
13526
13527
13528
13529
13530
13531
13532
13533
13534
13535
13536
13537
13538
13539
13540
13541
13542
13543
13544
13545
13546
13547
13548
13549
13550
13551
13552
13553
13554
13555
13556
13557
13558
13559
13560
13561
13562
13563
13564
13565
13566
13567
13568
13569
13570
13571
13572
13573
13574
13575
13576
13577
13578
13579
13580
13581
13582
13583
13584
13585
13586
13587
13588
13589
13590
13591
13592
13593
13594
13595
13596
13597
13598
13599
13600
13601
13602
13603
13604
13605
13606
13607
13608
13609
13610
13611
13612
13613
13614
13615
13616
13617
13618
13619
13620
13621
13622
13623
13624
13625
13626
13627
13628
13629
13630
13631
13632
13633
13634
13635
13636
13637
13638
13639
13640
13641
13642
13643
13644
13645
13646
13647
13648
13649
13650
13651
13652
13653
13654
13655
13656
13657
13658
13659
13660
13661
13662
13663
13664
13665
13666
13667
13668
13669
13670
13671
13672
13673
13674
13675
13676
13677
13678
13679
13680
13681
13682
13683
13684
13685
13686
13687
13688
13689
13690
13691
13692
13693
13694
13695
13696
13697
13698
13699
13700
13701
13702
13703
13704
13705
13706
13707
13708
13709
13710
13711
13712
13713
13714
13715
13716
13717
13718
13719
13720
13721
13722
13723
13724
13725
13726
13727
13728
13729
13730
13731
13732
13733
13734
13735
13736
13737
13738
13739
13740
13741
13742
13743
13744
13745
13746
13747
13748
13749
13750
13751
13752
13753
13754
13755
13756
13757
13758
13759
13760
13761
13762
13763
13764
13765
13766
13767
13768
13769
13770
13771
13772
13773
13774
13775
13776
13777
13778
13779
13780
13781
13782
13783
13784
13785
13786
13787
13788
13789
13790
13791
13792
13793
13794
13795
13796
13797
13798
13799
13800
13801
13802
13803
13804
13805
13806
13807
13808
13809
13810
13811
13812
13813
13814
13815
13816
13817
13818
13819
13820
13821
13822
13823
13824
13825
13826
13827
13828
13829
13830
13831
13832
13833
13834
13835
13836
13837
13838
13839
13840
13841
13842
13843
13844
13845
13846
13847
13848
13849
13850
13851
13852
13853
13854
13855
13856
13857
13858
13859
13860
13861
13862
13863
13864
13865
13866
13867
13868
13869
13870
13871
13872
13873
13874
13875
13876
13877
13878
13879
13880
13881
13882
13883
13884
13885
13886
13887
13888
13889
13890
13891
13892
13893
13894
13895
13896
13897
13898
13899
13900
13901
13902
13903
13904
13905
13906
13907
13908
13909
13910
13911
13912
13913
13914
13915
13916
13917
13918
13919
13920
13921
13922
13923
13924
13925
13926
13927
13928
13929
13930
13931
13932
13933
13934
13935
13936
13937
13938
13939
13940
13941
13942
13943
13944
13945
13946
13947
13948
13949
13950
13951
13952
13953
13954
13955
13956
13957
13958
13959
13960
13961
13962
13963
13964
13965
13966
13967
13968
13969
13970
13971
13972
13973
13974
13975
13976
13977
13978
13979
13980
13981
13982
13983
13984
13985
13986
13987
13988
13989
13990
13991
13992
13993
13994
13995
13996
13997
13998
13999
14000
14001
14002
14003
14004
14005
14006
14007
14008
14009
14010
14011
14012
14013
14014
14015
14016
14017
14018
14019
14020
14021
14022
14023
14024
14025
14026
14027
14028
14029
14030
14031
14032
14033
14034
14035
14036
14037
14038
14039
14040
14041
14042
14043
14044
14045
14046
14047
14048
14049
14050
14051
14052
14053
14054
14055
14056
14057
14058
14059
14060
14061
14062
14063
14064
14065
14066
14067
14068
14069
14070
14071
14072
14073
14074
14075
14076
14077
14078
14079
14080
14081
14082
14083
14084
14085
14086
14087
14088
14089
14090
14091
14092
14093
14094
14095
14096
14097
14098
14099
14100
14101
14102
14103
14104
14105
14106
14107
14108
14109
14110
14111
14112
14113
14114
14115
14116
14117
14118
14119
14120
14121
14122
14123
14124
14125
14126
14127
14128
14129
14130
14131
14132
14133
14134
14135
14136
14137
14138
14139
14140
14141
14142
14143
14144
14145
14146
14147
14148
14149
14150
14151
14152
14153
14154
14155
14156
14157
14158
14159
14160
14161
14162
14163
14164
14165
14166
14167
14168
14169
14170
14171
14172
14173
14174
14175
14176
14177
14178
14179
14180
14181
14182
14183
14184
14185
14186
14187
14188
14189
14190
14191
14192
14193
14194
14195
14196
14197
14198
14199
14200
14201
14202
14203
14204
14205
14206
14207
14208
14209
14210
14211
14212
14213
14214
14215
14216
14217
14218
14219
14220
14221
14222
14223
14224
14225
14226
14227
14228
14229
14230
14231
14232
14233
14234
14235
14236
14237
14238
14239
14240
14241
14242
14243
14244
14245
14246
14247
14248
14249
14250
14251
14252
14253
14254
14255
14256
14257
14258
14259
14260
14261
14262
14263
14264
14265
14266
14267
14268
14269
14270
14271
14272
14273
14274
14275
14276
14277
14278
14279
14280
14281
14282
14283
14284
14285
14286
14287
14288
14289
14290
14291
14292
14293
14294
14295
14296
14297
14298
14299
14300
14301
14302
14303
14304
14305
14306
14307
14308
14309
14310
14311
14312
14313
14314
14315
14316
14317
14318
14319
14320
14321
14322
14323
14324
14325
14326
14327
14328
14329
14330
14331
14332
14333
14334
14335
14336
14337
14338
14339
14340
14341
14342
14343
14344
14345
14346
14347
14348
14349
14350
14351
14352
14353
14354
14355
14356
14357
14358
14359
14360
14361
14362
14363
14364
14365
14366
14367
14368
14369
14370
14371
14372
14373
14374
14375
14376
14377
14378
14379
14380
14381
14382
14383
14384
14385
14386
14387
14388
14389
14390
14391
14392
14393
14394
14395
14396
14397
14398
14399
14400
14401
14402
14403
14404
14405
14406
14407
14408
14409
14410
14411
14412
14413
14414
14415
14416
14417
14418
14419
14420
14421
14422
14423
14424
14425
14426
14427
14428
14429
14430
14431
14432
14433
14434
14435
14436
14437
14438
14439
14440
14441
14442
14443
14444
14445
14446
14447
14448
14449
14450
14451
14452
14453
14454
14455
14456
14457
14458
14459
14460
14461
14462
14463
14464
14465
14466
14467
14468
14469
14470
14471
14472
14473
14474
14475
14476
14477
14478
14479
14480
14481
14482
14483
14484
14485
14486
14487
14488
14489
14490
14491
14492
14493
14494
14495
14496
14497
14498
14499
14500
14501
14502
14503
14504
14505
14506
14507
14508
14509
14510
14511
14512
14513
14514
14515
14516
14517
14518
14519
14520
14521
14522
14523
14524
14525
14526
14527
14528
14529
14530
14531
14532
14533
14534
14535
14536
14537
14538
14539
14540
14541
14542
14543
14544
14545
14546
14547
14548
14549
14550
14551
14552
14553
14554
14555
14556
14557
14558
14559
14560
14561
14562
14563
14564
14565
14566
14567
14568
14569
14570
14571
14572
14573
14574
14575
14576
14577
14578
14579
14580
14581
14582
14583
14584
14585
14586
14587
14588
14589
14590
14591
14592
14593
14594
14595
14596
14597
14598
14599
14600
14601
14602
14603
14604
14605
14606
14607
14608
14609
14610
14611
14612
14613
14614
14615
14616
14617
14618
14619
14620
14621
14622
14623
14624
14625
14626
14627
14628
14629
14630
14631
14632
14633
14634
14635
14636
14637
14638
14639
14640
14641
14642
14643
14644
14645
14646
14647
14648
14649
14650
14651
14652
14653
14654
14655
14656
14657
14658
14659
14660
14661
14662
14663
14664
14665
14666
14667
14668
14669
14670
14671
14672
14673
14674
14675
14676
14677
14678
14679
14680
14681
14682
14683
14684
14685
14686
14687
14688
14689
14690
14691
14692
14693
14694
14695
14696
14697
14698
14699
14700
14701
14702
14703
14704
14705
14706
14707
14708
14709
14710
14711
14712
14713
14714
14715
14716
14717
14718
14719
14720
14721
14722
14723
14724
14725
14726
14727
14728
14729
14730
14731
14732
14733
14734
14735
14736
14737
14738
14739
14740
14741
14742
14743
14744
14745
14746
14747
14748
14749
14750
14751
14752
14753
14754
14755
14756
14757
14758
14759
14760
14761
14762
14763
14764
14765
14766
14767
14768
14769
14770
14771
14772
14773
14774
14775
14776
14777
14778
14779
14780
14781
14782
14783
14784
14785
14786
14787
14788
14789
14790
14791
14792
14793
14794
14795
14796
14797
14798
14799
14800
14801
14802
14803
14804
14805
14806
14807
14808
14809
14810
14811
14812
14813
14814
14815
14816
14817
14818
14819
14820
14821
14822
14823
14824
14825
14826
14827
14828
14829
14830
14831
14832
14833
14834
14835
14836
14837
14838
14839
14840
14841
14842
14843
14844
14845
14846
14847
14848
14849
14850
14851
14852
14853
14854
14855
14856
14857
14858
14859
14860
14861
14862
14863
14864
14865
14866
14867
14868
14869
14870
14871
14872
14873
14874
14875
14876
14877
14878
14879
14880
14881
14882
14883
14884
14885
14886
14887
14888
14889
14890
14891
14892
14893
14894
14895
14896
14897
14898
14899
14900
14901
14902
14903
14904
14905
14906
14907
14908
14909
14910
14911
14912
14913
14914
14915
14916
14917
14918
14919
14920
14921
14922
14923
14924
14925
14926
14927
14928
14929
14930
14931
14932
14933
14934
14935
14936
14937
14938
14939
14940
14941
14942
14943
14944
14945
14946
14947
14948
14949
14950
14951
14952
14953
14954
14955
14956
14957
14958
14959
14960
14961
14962
14963
14964
14965
14966
14967
14968
14969
14970
14971
14972
14973
14974
14975
14976
14977
14978
14979
14980
14981
14982
14983
14984
14985
14986
14987
14988
14989
14990
14991
14992
14993
14994
14995
14996
14997
14998
14999
15000
15001
15002
15003
15004
15005
15006
15007
15008
15009
15010
15011
15012
15013
15014
15015
15016
15017
15018
15019
15020
15021
15022
15023
15024
15025
15026
15027
15028
15029
15030
15031
15032
15033
15034
15035
15036
15037
15038
15039
15040
15041
15042
15043
15044
15045
15046
15047
15048
15049
15050
15051
15052
15053
15054
15055
15056
15057
15058
15059
15060
15061
15062
15063
15064
15065
15066
15067
15068
15069
15070
15071
15072
15073
15074
15075
15076
15077
15078
15079
15080
15081
15082
15083
15084
15085
15086
15087
15088
15089
15090
15091
15092
15093
15094
15095
15096
15097
15098
15099
15100
15101
15102
15103
15104
15105
15106
15107
15108
15109
15110
15111
15112
15113
15114
15115
15116
15117
15118
15119
15120
15121
15122
15123
15124
15125
15126
15127
15128
15129
15130
15131
15132
15133
15134
15135
15136
15137
15138
15139
15140
15141
15142
15143
15144
15145
15146
15147
15148
15149
15150
15151
15152
15153
15154
15155
15156
15157
15158
15159
15160
15161
15162
15163
15164
15165
15166
15167
15168
15169
15170
15171
15172
15173
15174
15175
15176
15177
15178
15179
15180
15181
15182
15183
15184
15185
15186
15187
15188
15189
15190
15191
15192
15193
15194
15195
15196
15197
15198
15199
15200
15201
15202
15203
15204
15205
15206
15207
15208
15209
15210
15211
15212
15213
15214
15215
15216
15217
15218
15219
15220
15221
15222
15223
15224
15225
15226
15227
15228
15229
15230
15231
15232
15233
15234
15235
15236
15237
15238
15239
15240
15241
15242
15243
15244
15245
15246
15247
15248
15249
15250
15251
15252
15253
15254
15255
15256
15257
15258
15259
15260
15261
15262
15263
15264
15265
15266
15267
15268
15269
15270
15271
15272
15273
15274
15275
15276
15277
15278
15279
15280
15281
15282
15283
15284
15285
15286
15287
15288
15289
15290
15291
15292
15293
15294
15295
15296
15297
15298
15299
15300
15301
15302
15303
15304
15305
15306
15307
15308
15309
15310
15311
15312
15313
15314
15315
15316
15317
15318
15319
15320
15321
15322
15323
15324
15325
15326
15327
15328
15329
15330
15331
15332
15333
15334
15335
15336
15337
15338
15339
15340
15341
15342
15343
15344
15345
15346
15347
15348
15349
15350
15351
15352
15353
15354
15355
15356
15357
15358
15359
15360
15361
15362
15363
15364
15365
15366
15367
15368
15369
15370
15371
15372
15373
15374
15375
15376
15377
15378
15379
15380
15381
15382
15383
15384
15385
15386
15387
15388
15389
15390
15391
15392
15393
15394
15395
15396
15397
15398
15399
15400
15401
15402
15403
15404
15405
15406
15407
15408
15409
15410
15411
15412
15413
15414
15415
15416
15417
15418
15419
15420
15421
15422
15423
15424
15425
15426
15427
15428
15429
15430
15431
15432
15433
15434
15435
15436
15437
15438
15439
15440
15441
15442
15443
15444
15445
15446
15447
15448
15449
15450
15451
15452
15453
15454
15455
15456
15457
15458
15459
15460
15461
15462
15463
15464
15465
15466
15467
15468
15469
15470
15471
15472
15473
15474
15475
15476
15477
15478
15479
15480
15481
15482
15483
15484
15485
15486
15487
15488
15489
15490
15491
15492
15493
15494
15495
15496
15497
15498
15499
15500
15501
15502
15503
15504
15505
15506
15507
15508
15509
15510
15511
15512
15513
15514
15515
15516
15517
15518
15519
15520
15521
15522
15523
15524
15525
15526
15527
15528
15529
15530
15531
15532
15533
15534
15535
15536
15537
15538
15539
15540
15541
15542
15543
15544
15545
15546
15547
15548
15549
15550
15551
15552
15553
15554
15555
15556
15557
15558
15559
15560
15561
15562
15563
15564
15565
15566
15567
15568
15569
15570
15571
15572
15573
15574
15575
15576
15577
15578
15579
15580
15581
15582
15583
15584
15585
15586
15587
15588
15589
15590
15591
15592
15593
15594
15595
15596
15597
15598
15599
15600
15601
15602
15603
15604
15605
15606
15607
15608
15609
15610
15611
15612
15613
15614
15615
15616
15617
15618
15619
15620
15621
15622
15623
15624
15625
15626
15627
15628
15629
15630
15631
15632
15633
15634
15635
15636
15637
15638
15639
15640
15641
15642
15643
15644
15645
15646
15647
15648
15649
15650
15651
15652
15653
15654
15655
15656
15657
15658
15659
15660
15661
15662
15663
15664
15665
15666
15667
15668
15669
15670
15671
15672
15673
15674
15675
15676
15677
15678
15679
15680
15681
15682
15683
15684
15685
15686
15687
15688
15689
15690
15691
15692
15693
15694
15695
15696
15697
15698
15699
15700
15701
15702
15703
15704
15705
15706
15707
15708
15709
15710
15711
15712
15713
15714
15715
15716
15717
15718
15719
15720
15721
15722
15723
15724
15725
15726
15727
15728
15729
15730
15731
15732
15733
15734
15735
15736
15737
15738
15739
15740
15741
15742
15743
15744
15745
15746
15747
15748
15749
15750
15751
15752
15753
15754
15755
15756
15757
15758
15759
15760
15761
15762
15763
15764
15765
15766
15767
15768
15769
15770
15771
15772
15773
15774
15775
15776
15777
15778
15779
15780
15781
15782
15783
15784
15785
15786
15787
15788
15789
15790
15791
15792
15793
15794
15795
15796
15797
15798
15799
15800
15801
15802
15803
15804
15805
15806
15807
15808
15809
15810
15811
15812
15813
15814
15815
15816
15817
15818
15819
15820
15821
15822
15823
15824
15825
15826
15827
15828
15829
15830
15831
15832
15833
15834
15835
15836
15837
15838
15839
15840
15841
15842
15843
15844
15845
15846
15847
15848
15849
15850
15851
15852
15853
15854
15855
15856
15857
15858
15859
15860
15861
15862
15863
15864
15865
15866
15867
15868
15869
15870
15871
15872
15873
15874
15875
15876
15877
15878
15879
15880
15881
15882
15883
15884
15885
15886
15887
15888
15889
15890
15891
15892
15893
15894
15895
15896
15897
15898
15899
15900
15901
15902
15903
15904
15905
15906
15907
15908
15909
15910
15911
15912
15913
15914
15915
15916
15917
15918
15919
15920
15921
15922
15923
15924
15925
15926
15927
15928
15929
15930
15931
15932
15933
15934
15935
15936
15937
15938
15939
15940
15941
15942
15943
15944
15945
15946
15947
15948
15949
15950
15951
15952
15953
15954
15955
15956
15957
15958
15959
15960
15961
15962
15963
15964
15965
15966
15967
15968
15969
15970
15971
15972
15973
15974
15975
15976
15977
15978
15979
15980
15981
15982
15983
15984
15985
15986
15987
15988
15989
15990
15991
15992
15993
15994
15995
15996
15997
15998
15999
16000
16001
16002
16003
16004
16005
16006
16007
16008
16009
16010
16011
16012
16013
16014
16015
16016
16017
16018
16019
16020
16021
16022
16023
16024
16025
16026
16027
16028
16029
16030
16031
16032
16033
16034
16035
16036
16037
16038
16039
16040
16041
16042
16043
16044
16045
16046
16047
16048
16049
16050
16051
16052
16053
16054
16055
16056
16057
16058
16059
16060
16061
16062
16063
16064
16065
16066
16067
16068
16069
16070
16071
16072
16073
16074
16075
16076
16077
16078
16079
16080
16081
16082
16083
16084
16085
16086
16087
16088
16089
16090
16091
16092
16093
16094
16095
16096
16097
16098
16099
16100
16101
16102
16103
16104
16105
16106
16107
16108
16109
16110
16111
16112
16113
16114
16115
16116
16117
16118
16119
16120
16121
16122
16123
16124
16125
16126
16127
16128
16129
16130
16131
16132
16133
16134
16135
16136
16137
16138
16139
16140
16141
16142
16143
16144
16145
16146
16147
16148
16149
16150
16151
16152
16153
16154
16155
16156
16157
16158
16159
16160
16161
16162
16163
16164
16165
16166
16167
16168
16169
16170
16171
16172
16173
16174
16175
16176
16177
16178
16179
16180
16181
16182
16183
16184
16185
16186
16187
16188
16189
16190
16191
16192
16193
16194
16195
16196
16197
16198
16199
16200
16201
16202
16203
16204
16205
16206
16207
16208
16209
16210
16211
16212
16213
16214
16215
16216
16217
16218
16219
16220
16221
16222
16223
16224
16225
16226
16227
16228
16229
16230
16231
16232
16233
16234
16235
16236
16237
16238
16239
16240
16241
16242
16243
16244
16245
16246
16247
16248
16249
16250
16251
16252
16253
16254
16255
16256
16257
16258
16259
16260
16261
16262
16263
16264
16265
16266
16267
16268
16269
16270
16271
16272
16273
16274
16275
16276
16277
16278
16279
16280
16281
16282
16283
16284
16285
16286
16287
16288
16289
16290
16291
16292
16293
16294
16295
16296
16297
16298
16299
16300
16301
16302
16303
16304
16305
16306
16307
16308
16309
16310
16311
16312
16313
16314
16315
16316
16317
16318
16319
16320
16321
16322
16323
16324
16325
16326
16327
16328
16329
16330
16331
16332
16333
16334
16335
16336
16337
16338
16339
16340
16341
16342
16343
16344
16345
16346
16347
16348
16349
16350
16351
16352
16353
16354
16355
16356
16357
16358
16359
16360
16361
16362
16363
16364
16365
16366
16367
16368
16369
16370
16371
16372
16373
16374
16375
16376
16377
16378
16379
16380
16381
16382
16383
16384
16385
16386
16387
16388
16389
16390
16391
16392
16393
16394
16395
16396
16397
16398
16399
16400
16401
16402
16403
16404
16405
16406
16407
16408
16409
16410
16411
16412
16413
16414
16415
16416
16417
16418
16419
16420
16421
16422
16423
16424
16425
16426
16427
16428
16429
16430
16431
16432
16433
16434
16435
16436
16437
16438
16439
16440
16441
16442
16443
16444
16445
16446
16447
16448
16449
16450
16451
16452
16453
16454
16455
16456
16457
16458
16459
16460
16461
16462
16463
16464
16465
16466
16467
16468
16469
16470
16471
16472
16473
16474
16475
16476
16477
16478
16479
16480
16481
16482
16483
16484
16485
16486
16487
16488
16489
16490
16491
16492
16493
16494
16495
16496
16497
16498
16499
16500
16501
16502
16503
16504
16505
16506
16507
16508
16509
16510
16511
16512
16513
16514
16515
16516
16517
16518
16519
16520
16521
16522
16523
16524
16525
16526
16527
16528
16529
16530
16531
16532
16533
16534
16535
16536
16537
16538
16539
16540
16541
16542
16543
16544
16545
16546
16547
16548
16549
16550
16551
16552
16553
16554
16555
16556
16557
16558
16559
16560
16561
16562
16563
16564
16565
16566
16567
16568
16569
16570
16571
16572
16573
16574
16575
16576
16577
16578
16579
16580
16581
16582
16583
16584
16585
16586
16587
16588
16589
16590
16591
16592
16593
16594
16595
16596
16597
16598
16599
16600
16601
16602
16603
16604
16605
16606
16607
16608
16609
16610
16611
16612
16613
16614
16615
16616
16617
16618
16619
16620
16621
16622
16623
16624
16625
16626
16627
16628
16629
16630
16631
16632
16633
16634
16635
16636
16637
16638
16639
16640
16641
16642
16643
16644
16645
16646
16647
16648
16649
16650
16651
16652
16653
16654
16655
16656
16657
16658
16659
16660
16661
16662
16663
16664
16665
16666
16667
16668
16669
16670
16671
16672
16673
16674
16675
16676
16677
16678
16679
16680
16681
16682
16683
16684
16685
16686
16687
16688
16689
16690
16691
16692
16693
16694
16695
16696
16697
16698
16699
16700
16701
16702
16703
16704
16705
16706
16707
16708
16709
16710
16711
16712
16713
16714
16715
16716
16717
16718
16719
16720
16721
16722
16723
16724
16725
16726
16727
16728
16729
16730
16731
16732
16733
16734
16735
16736
16737
16738
16739
16740
16741
16742
16743
16744
16745
16746
16747
16748
16749
16750
16751
16752
16753
16754
16755
16756
16757
16758
16759
16760
16761
16762
16763
16764
16765
16766
16767
16768
16769
16770
16771
16772
16773
16774
16775
16776
16777
16778
16779
16780
16781
16782
16783
16784
16785
16786
16787
16788
16789
16790
16791
16792
16793
16794
16795
16796
16797
16798
16799
16800
16801
16802
16803
16804
16805
16806
16807
16808
16809
16810
16811
16812
16813
16814
16815
16816
16817
16818
16819
16820
16821
16822
16823
16824
16825
16826
16827
16828
16829
16830
16831
16832
16833
16834
16835
16836
16837
16838
16839
16840
16841
16842
16843
16844
16845
16846
16847
16848
16849
16850
16851
16852
16853
16854
16855
16856
16857
16858
16859
16860
16861
16862
16863
16864
16865
16866
16867
16868
16869
16870
16871
16872
16873
16874
16875
16876
16877
16878
16879
16880
16881
16882
16883
16884
16885
16886
16887
16888
16889
16890
16891
16892
16893
16894
16895
16896
16897
16898
16899
16900
16901
16902
16903
16904
16905
16906
16907
16908
16909
16910
16911
16912
16913
16914
16915
16916
16917
16918
16919
16920
16921
16922
16923
16924
16925
16926
16927
16928
16929
16930
16931
16932
16933
16934
16935
16936
16937
16938
16939
16940
16941
16942
16943
16944
16945
16946
16947
16948
16949
16950
16951
16952
16953
16954
16955
16956
16957
16958
16959
16960
16961
16962
16963
16964
16965
16966
16967
16968
16969
16970
16971
16972
16973
16974
16975
16976
16977
16978
16979
16980
16981
16982
16983
16984
16985
16986
16987
16988
16989
16990
16991
16992
16993
16994
16995
16996
16997
16998
16999
17000
17001
17002
17003
17004
17005
17006
17007
17008
17009
17010
17011
17012
17013
17014
17015
17016
17017
17018
17019
17020
17021
17022
17023
17024
17025
17026
17027
17028
17029
17030
17031
17032
17033
17034
17035
17036
17037
17038
17039
17040
17041
17042
17043
17044
17045
17046
17047
17048
17049
17050
17051
17052
17053
17054
17055
17056
17057
17058
17059
17060
17061
17062
17063
17064
17065
17066
17067
17068
17069
17070
17071
17072
17073
17074
17075
17076
17077
17078
17079
17080
17081
17082
17083
17084
17085
17086
17087
17088
17089
17090
17091
17092
17093
17094
17095
17096
17097
17098
17099
17100
17101
17102
17103
17104
17105
17106
17107
17108
17109
17110
17111
17112
17113
17114
17115
17116
17117
17118
17119
17120
17121
17122
17123
17124
17125
17126
17127
17128
17129
17130
17131
17132
17133
17134
17135
17136
17137
17138
17139
17140
17141
17142
17143
17144
17145
17146
17147
17148
17149
17150
17151
17152
17153
17154
17155
17156
17157
17158
17159
17160
17161
17162
17163
17164
17165
17166
17167
17168
17169
17170
17171
17172
17173
17174
17175
17176
17177
17178
17179
17180
17181
17182
17183
17184
17185
17186
17187
17188
17189
17190
17191
17192
17193
17194
17195
17196
17197
17198
17199
17200
17201
17202
17203
17204
17205
17206
17207
17208
17209
17210
17211
17212
17213
17214
17215
17216
17217
17218
17219
17220
17221
17222
17223
17224
17225
17226
17227
17228
17229
17230
17231
17232
17233
17234
17235
17236
17237
17238
17239
17240
17241
17242
17243
17244
17245
17246
17247
17248
17249
17250
17251
17252
17253
17254
17255
17256
17257
17258
17259
17260
17261
17262
17263
17264
17265
17266
17267
17268
17269
17270
17271
17272
17273
17274
17275
17276
17277
17278
17279
17280
17281
17282
17283
17284
17285
17286
17287
17288
17289
17290
17291
17292
17293
17294
17295
17296
17297
17298
17299
17300
17301
17302
17303
17304
17305
17306
17307
17308
17309
17310
17311
17312
17313
17314
17315
17316
17317
17318
17319
17320
17321
17322
17323
17324
17325
17326
17327
17328
17329
17330
17331
17332
17333
17334
17335
17336
17337
17338
17339
17340
17341
17342
17343
17344
17345
17346
17347
17348
17349
17350
17351
17352
17353
17354
17355
17356
17357
17358
17359
17360
17361
17362
17363
17364
17365
17366
17367
17368
17369
17370
17371
17372
17373
17374
17375
17376
17377
17378
17379
17380
17381
17382
17383
17384
17385
17386
17387
17388
17389
17390
17391
17392
17393
17394
17395
17396
17397
17398
17399
17400
17401
17402
17403
17404
17405
17406
17407
17408
17409
17410
17411
17412
17413
17414
17415
17416
17417
17418
17419
17420
17421
17422
17423
17424
17425
17426
17427
17428
17429
17430
17431
17432
17433
17434
17435
17436
17437
17438
17439
17440
17441
17442
17443
17444
17445
17446
17447
17448
17449
17450
17451
17452
17453
17454
17455
17456
17457
17458
17459
17460
17461
17462
17463
17464
17465
17466
17467
17468
17469
17470
17471
17472
17473
17474
17475
17476
17477
17478
17479
17480
17481
17482
17483
17484
17485
17486
17487
17488
17489
17490
17491
17492
17493
17494
17495
17496
17497
17498
17499
17500
17501
17502
17503
17504
17505
17506
17507
17508
17509
17510
17511
17512
17513
17514
17515
17516
17517
17518
17519
17520
17521
17522
17523
17524
17525
17526
17527
17528
17529
17530
17531
17532
17533
17534
17535
17536
17537
17538
17539
17540
17541
17542
17543
17544
17545
17546
17547
17548
17549
17550
17551
17552
17553
17554
17555
17556
17557
17558
17559
17560
17561
17562
17563
17564
17565
17566
17567
17568
17569
17570
17571
17572
17573
17574
17575
17576
17577
17578
17579
17580
17581
17582
17583
17584
17585
17586
17587
17588
17589
17590
17591
17592
17593
17594
17595
17596
17597
17598
17599
17600
17601
17602
17603
17604
17605
17606
17607
17608
17609
17610
17611
17612
17613
17614
17615
17616
17617
17618
17619
17620
17621
17622
17623
17624
17625
17626
17627
17628
17629
17630
17631
17632
17633
17634
17635
17636
17637
17638
17639
17640
17641
17642
17643
17644
17645
17646
17647
17648
17649
17650
17651
17652
17653
17654
17655
17656
17657
17658
17659
17660
17661
17662
17663
17664
17665
17666
17667
17668
17669
17670
17671
17672
17673
17674
17675
17676
17677
17678
17679
17680
17681
17682
17683
17684
17685
17686
17687
17688
17689
17690
17691
17692
17693
17694
17695
17696
17697
17698
17699
17700
17701
17702
17703
17704
17705
17706
17707
17708
17709
17710
17711
17712
17713
17714
17715
17716
17717
17718
17719
17720
17721
17722
17723
17724
17725
17726
17727
17728
17729
17730
17731
17732
17733
17734
17735
17736
17737
17738
17739
17740
17741
17742
17743
17744
17745
17746
17747
17748
17749
17750
17751
17752
17753
17754
17755
17756
17757
17758
17759
17760
17761
17762
17763
17764
17765
17766
17767
17768
17769
17770
17771
17772
17773
17774
17775
17776
17777
17778
17779
17780
17781
17782
17783
17784
17785
17786
17787
17788
17789
17790
17791
17792
17793
17794
17795
17796
17797
17798
17799
17800
17801
17802
17803
17804
17805
17806
17807
17808
17809
17810
17811
17812
17813
17814
17815
17816
17817
17818
17819
17820
17821
17822
17823
17824
17825
17826
17827
17828
17829
17830
17831
17832
17833
17834
17835
17836
17837
17838
17839
17840
17841
17842
17843
17844
17845
17846
17847
17848
17849
17850
17851
17852
17853
17854
17855
17856
17857
17858
17859
17860
17861
17862
17863
17864
17865
17866
17867
17868
17869
17870
17871
17872
17873
17874
17875
17876
17877
17878
17879
17880
17881
17882
17883
17884
17885
17886
17887
17888
17889
17890
17891
17892
17893
17894
17895
17896
17897
17898
17899
17900
17901
17902
17903
17904
17905
17906
17907
17908
17909
17910
17911
17912
17913
17914
17915
17916
17917
17918
17919
17920
17921
17922
17923
17924
17925
17926
17927
17928
17929
17930
17931
17932
17933
17934
17935
17936
17937
17938
17939
17940
17941
17942
17943
17944
17945
17946
17947
17948
17949
17950
17951
17952
17953
17954
17955
17956
17957
17958
17959
17960
17961
17962
17963
17964
17965
17966
17967
17968
17969
17970
17971
17972
17973
17974
17975
17976
17977
17978
17979
17980
17981
17982
17983
17984
17985
17986
17987
17988
17989
17990
17991
17992
17993
17994
17995
17996
17997
17998
17999
18000
18001
18002
18003
18004
18005
18006
18007
18008
18009
18010
18011
18012
18013
18014
18015
18016
18017
18018
18019
18020
18021
18022
18023
18024
18025
18026
18027
18028
18029
18030
18031
18032
18033
18034
18035
18036
18037
18038
18039
18040
18041
18042
18043
18044
18045
18046
18047
18048
18049
18050
18051
18052
18053
18054
18055
18056
18057
18058
18059
18060
18061
18062
18063
18064
18065
18066
18067
18068
18069
18070
18071
18072
18073
18074
18075
18076
18077
18078
18079
18080
18081
18082
18083
18084
18085
18086
18087
18088
18089
18090
18091
18092
18093
18094
18095
18096
18097
18098
18099
18100
18101
18102
18103
18104
18105
18106
18107
18108
18109
18110
18111
18112
18113
18114
18115
18116
18117
18118
18119
18120
18121
18122
18123
18124
18125
18126
18127
18128
18129
18130
18131
18132
18133
18134
18135
18136
18137
18138
18139
18140
18141
18142
18143
18144
18145
18146
18147
18148
18149
18150
18151
18152
18153
18154
18155
18156
18157
18158
18159
18160
18161
18162
18163
18164
18165
18166
18167
18168
18169
18170
18171
18172
18173
18174
18175
18176
18177
18178
18179
18180
18181
18182
18183
18184
18185
18186
18187
18188
18189
18190
18191
18192
18193
18194
18195
18196
18197
18198
18199
18200
18201
18202
18203
18204
18205
18206
18207
18208
18209
18210
18211
18212
18213
18214
18215
18216
18217
18218
18219
18220
18221
18222
18223
18224
18225
18226
18227
18228
18229
18230
18231
18232
18233
18234
18235
18236
18237
18238
18239
18240
18241
18242
18243
18244
18245
18246
18247
18248
18249
18250
18251
18252
18253
18254
18255
18256
18257
18258
18259
18260
18261
18262
18263
18264
18265
18266
18267
18268
18269
18270
18271
18272
18273
18274
18275
18276
18277
18278
18279
18280
18281
18282
18283
18284
18285
18286
18287
18288
18289
18290
18291
18292
18293
18294
18295
18296
18297
18298
18299
18300
18301
18302
18303
18304
18305
18306
18307
18308
18309
18310
18311
18312
18313
18314
18315
18316
18317
18318
18319
18320
18321
18322
18323
18324
18325
18326
18327
18328
18329
18330
18331
18332
18333
18334
18335
18336
18337
18338
18339
18340
18341
18342
18343
18344
18345
18346
18347
18348
18349
18350
18351
18352
18353
18354
18355
18356
18357
18358
18359
18360
18361
18362
18363
18364
18365
18366
18367
18368
18369
18370
18371
18372
18373
18374
18375
18376
18377
18378
18379
18380
18381
18382
18383
18384
18385
18386
18387
18388
18389
18390
18391
18392
18393
18394
18395
18396
18397
18398
18399
18400
18401
18402
18403
18404
18405
18406
18407
18408
18409
18410
18411
18412
18413
18414
18415
18416
18417
18418
18419
18420
18421
18422
18423
18424
18425
18426
18427
18428
18429
18430
18431
18432
18433
18434
18435
18436
18437
18438
18439
18440
18441
18442
18443
18444
18445
18446
18447
18448
18449
18450
18451
18452
18453
18454
18455
18456
18457
18458
18459
18460
18461
18462
18463
18464
18465
18466
18467
18468
18469
18470
18471
18472
18473
18474
18475
18476
18477
18478
18479
18480
18481
18482
18483
18484
18485
18486
18487
18488
18489
18490
18491
18492
18493
18494
18495
18496
18497
18498
18499
18500
18501
18502
18503
18504
18505
18506
18507
18508
18509
18510
18511
18512
18513
18514
18515
18516
18517
18518
18519
18520
18521
18522
18523
18524
18525
18526
18527
18528
18529
18530
18531
18532
18533
18534
18535
18536
18537
18538
18539
18540
18541
18542
18543
18544
18545
18546
18547
18548
18549
18550
18551
18552
18553
18554
18555
18556
18557
18558
18559
18560
18561
18562
18563
18564
18565
18566
18567
18568
18569
18570
18571
18572
18573
18574
18575
18576
18577
18578
18579
18580
18581
18582
18583
18584
18585
18586
18587
18588
18589
18590
18591
18592
18593
18594
18595
18596
18597
18598
18599
18600
18601
18602
18603
18604
18605
18606
18607
18608
18609
18610
18611
18612
18613
18614
18615
18616
18617
18618
18619
18620
18621
18622
18623
18624
18625
18626
18627
18628
18629
18630
18631
18632
18633
18634
18635
18636
18637
18638
18639
18640
18641
18642
18643
18644
18645
18646
18647
18648
18649
18650
18651
18652
18653
18654
18655
18656
18657
18658
18659
18660
18661
18662
18663
18664
18665
18666
18667
18668
18669
18670
18671
18672
18673
18674
18675
18676
18677
18678
18679
18680
18681
18682
18683
18684
18685
18686
18687
18688
18689
18690
18691
18692
18693
18694
18695
18696
18697
18698
18699
18700
18701
18702
18703
18704
18705
18706
18707
18708
18709
18710
18711
18712
18713
18714
18715
18716
18717
18718
18719
18720
18721
18722
18723
18724
18725
18726
18727
18728
18729
18730
18731
18732
18733
18734
18735
18736
18737
18738
18739
18740
18741
18742
18743
18744
18745
18746
18747
18748
18749
18750
18751
18752
18753
18754
18755
18756
18757
18758
18759
18760
18761
18762
18763
18764
18765
18766
18767
18768
18769
18770
18771
18772
18773
18774
18775
18776
18777
18778
18779
18780
18781
18782
18783
18784
18785
18786
18787
18788
18789
18790
18791
18792
18793
18794
18795
18796
18797
18798
18799
18800
18801
18802
18803
18804
18805
18806
18807
18808
18809
18810
18811
18812
18813
18814
18815
18816
18817
18818
18819
18820
18821
18822
18823
18824
18825
18826
18827
18828
18829
18830
18831
18832
18833
18834
18835
18836
18837
18838
18839
18840
18841
18842
18843
18844
18845
18846
18847
18848
18849
18850
18851
18852
18853
18854
18855
18856
18857
18858
18859
18860
18861
18862
18863
18864
18865
18866
18867
18868
18869
18870
18871
18872
18873
18874
18875
18876
18877
18878
18879
18880
18881
18882
18883
18884
18885
18886
18887
18888
18889
18890
18891
18892
18893
18894
18895
18896
18897
18898
18899
18900
18901
18902
18903
18904
18905
18906
18907
18908
18909
18910
18911
18912
18913
18914
18915
18916
18917
18918
18919
18920
18921
18922
18923
18924
18925
18926
18927
18928
18929
18930
18931
18932
18933
18934
18935
18936
18937
18938
18939
18940
18941
18942
18943
18944
18945
18946
18947
18948
18949
18950
18951
18952
18953
18954
18955
18956
18957
18958
18959
18960
18961
18962
18963
18964
18965
18966
18967
18968
18969
18970
18971
18972
18973
18974
18975
18976
18977
18978
18979
18980
18981
18982
18983
18984
18985
18986
18987
18988
18989
18990
18991
18992
18993
18994
18995
18996
18997
18998
18999
19000
19001
19002
19003
19004
19005
19006
19007
19008
19009
19010
19011
19012
19013
19014
19015
19016
19017
19018
19019
19020
19021
19022
19023
19024
19025
19026
19027
19028
19029
19030
19031
19032
19033
19034
19035
19036
19037
19038
19039
19040
19041
19042
19043
19044
19045
19046
19047
19048
19049
19050
19051
19052
19053
19054
19055
19056
19057
19058
19059
19060
19061
19062
19063
19064
19065
19066
19067
19068
19069
19070
19071
19072
19073
19074
19075
19076
19077
19078
19079
19080
19081
19082
19083
19084
19085
19086
19087
19088
19089
19090
19091
19092
19093
19094
19095
19096
19097
19098
19099
19100
19101
19102
19103
19104
19105
19106
19107
19108
19109
19110
19111
19112
19113
19114
19115
19116
19117
19118
19119
19120
19121
19122
19123
19124
19125
19126
19127
19128
19129
19130
19131
19132
19133
19134
19135
19136
19137
19138
19139
19140
19141
19142
19143
19144
19145
19146
19147
19148
19149
19150
19151
19152
19153
19154
19155
19156
19157
19158
19159
19160
19161
19162
19163
19164
19165
19166
19167
19168
19169
19170
19171
19172
19173
19174
19175
19176
19177
19178
19179
19180
19181
19182
19183
19184
19185
19186
19187
19188
19189
19190
19191
19192
19193
19194
19195
19196
19197
19198
19199
19200
19201
19202
19203
19204
19205
19206
19207
19208
19209
19210
19211
19212
19213
19214
19215
19216
19217
19218
19219
19220
19221
19222
19223
19224
19225
19226
19227
19228
19229
19230
19231
19232
19233
19234
19235
19236
19237
19238
19239
19240
19241
19242
19243
19244
19245
19246
19247
19248
19249
19250
19251
19252
19253
19254
19255
19256
19257
19258
19259
19260
19261
19262
19263
19264
19265
19266
19267
19268
19269
19270
19271
19272
19273
19274
19275
19276
19277
19278
19279
19280
19281
19282
19283
19284
19285
19286
19287
19288
19289
19290
19291
19292
19293
19294
19295
19296
19297
19298
19299
19300
19301
19302
19303
19304
19305
19306
19307
19308
19309
19310
19311
19312
19313
19314
19315
19316
19317
19318
19319
19320
19321
19322
19323
19324
19325
19326
19327
19328
19329
19330
19331
19332
19333
19334
19335
19336
19337
19338
19339
19340
19341
19342
19343
19344
19345
19346
19347
19348
19349
19350
19351
19352
19353
19354
19355
19356
19357
19358
19359
19360
19361
19362
19363
19364
19365
19366
19367
19368
19369
19370
19371
19372
19373
19374
19375
19376
19377
19378
19379
19380
19381
19382
19383
19384
19385
19386
19387
19388
19389
19390
19391
19392
19393
19394
19395
19396
19397
19398
19399
19400
19401
19402
19403
19404
19405
19406
19407
19408
19409
19410
19411
19412
19413
19414
19415
19416
19417
19418
19419
19420
19421
19422
19423
19424
19425
19426
19427
19428
19429
19430
19431
19432
19433
19434
19435
19436
19437
19438
19439
19440
19441
19442
19443
19444
19445
19446
19447
19448
19449
19450
19451
19452
19453
19454
19455
19456
19457
19458
19459
19460
19461
19462
19463
19464
19465
19466
19467
19468
19469
19470
19471
19472
19473
19474
19475
19476
19477
19478
19479
19480
19481
19482
19483
19484
19485
19486
19487
19488
19489
19490
19491
19492
19493
19494
19495
19496
19497
19498
19499
19500
19501
19502
19503
19504
19505
19506
19507
19508
19509
19510
19511
19512
19513
19514
19515
19516
19517
19518
19519
19520
19521
19522
19523
19524
19525
19526
19527
19528
19529
19530
19531
19532
19533
19534
19535
19536
19537
19538
19539
19540
19541
19542
19543
19544
19545
19546
19547
19548
19549
19550
19551
19552
19553
19554
19555
19556
19557
19558
19559
19560
19561
19562
19563
19564
19565
19566
19567
19568
19569
19570
19571
19572
19573
19574
19575
19576
19577
19578
19579
19580
19581
19582
19583
19584
19585
19586
19587
19588
19589
19590
19591
19592
19593
19594
19595
19596
19597
19598
19599
19600
19601
19602
19603
19604
19605
19606
19607
19608
19609
19610
19611
19612
19613
19614
19615
19616
19617
19618
19619
19620
19621
19622
19623
19624
19625
19626
19627
19628
19629
19630
19631
19632
19633
19634
19635
19636
19637
19638
19639
19640
19641
19642
19643
19644
19645
19646
19647
19648
19649
19650
19651
19652
19653
19654
19655
19656
19657
19658
19659
19660
19661
19662
19663
19664
19665
19666
19667
19668
19669
19670
19671
19672
19673
19674
19675
19676
19677
19678
19679
19680
19681
19682
19683
19684
19685
19686
19687
19688
19689
19690
19691
19692
19693
19694
19695
19696
19697
19698
19699
19700
19701
19702
19703
19704
19705
19706
19707
19708
19709
19710
19711
19712
19713
19714
19715
19716
19717
19718
19719
19720
19721
19722
19723
19724
19725
19726
19727
19728
19729
19730
19731
19732
19733
19734
19735
19736
19737
19738
19739
19740
19741
19742
19743
19744
19745
19746
19747
19748
19749
19750
19751
19752
19753
19754
19755
19756
19757
19758
19759
19760
19761
19762
19763
19764
19765
19766
19767
19768
19769
19770
19771
19772
19773
19774
19775
19776
19777
19778
19779
19780
19781
19782
19783
19784
19785
19786
19787
19788
19789
19790
19791
19792
19793
19794
19795
19796
19797
19798
19799
19800
19801
19802
19803
19804
19805
19806
19807
19808
19809
19810
19811
19812
19813
19814
19815
19816
19817
19818
19819
19820
19821
19822
19823
19824
19825
19826
19827
19828
19829
19830
19831
19832
19833
19834
19835
19836
19837
19838
19839
19840
19841
19842
19843
19844
19845
19846
19847
19848
19849
19850
19851
19852
19853
19854
19855
19856
19857
19858
19859
19860
19861
19862
19863
19864
19865
19866
19867
19868
19869
19870
19871
19872
19873
19874
19875
19876
19877
19878
19879
19880
19881
19882
19883
19884
19885
19886
19887
19888
19889
19890
19891
19892
19893
19894
19895
19896
19897
19898
19899
19900
19901
19902
19903
19904
19905
19906
19907
19908
19909
19910
19911
19912
19913
19914
19915
19916
19917
19918
19919
19920
19921
19922
19923
19924
19925
19926
19927
19928
19929
19930
19931
19932
19933
19934
19935
19936
19937
19938
19939
19940
19941
19942
19943
19944
19945
19946
19947
19948
19949
19950
19951
19952
19953
19954
19955
19956
19957
19958
19959
19960
19961
19962
19963
19964
19965
19966
19967
19968
19969
19970
19971
19972
19973
19974
19975
19976
19977
19978
19979
19980
19981
19982
19983
19984
19985
19986
19987
19988
19989
19990
19991
19992
19993
19994
19995
19996
19997
19998
19999
20000
20001
20002
20003
20004
20005
20006
20007
20008
20009
20010
20011
20012
20013
20014
20015
20016
20017
20018
20019
20020
20021
20022
20023
20024
20025
20026
20027
20028
20029
20030
20031
20032
20033
20034
20035
20036
20037
20038
20039
20040
20041
20042
20043
20044
20045
20046
20047
20048
20049
20050
20051
20052
20053
20054
20055
20056
20057
20058
20059
20060
20061
20062
20063
20064
20065
20066
20067
20068
20069
20070
20071
20072
20073
20074
20075
20076
20077
20078
20079
20080
20081
20082
20083
20084
20085
20086
20087
20088
20089
20090
20091
20092
20093
20094
20095
20096
20097
20098
20099
20100
20101
20102
20103
20104
20105
20106
20107
20108
20109
20110
20111
20112
20113
20114
20115
20116
20117
20118
20119
20120
20121
20122
20123
20124
20125
20126
20127
20128
20129
20130
20131
20132
20133
20134
20135
20136
20137
20138
20139
20140
20141
20142
20143
20144
20145
20146
20147
20148
20149
20150
20151
20152
20153
20154
20155
20156
20157
20158
20159
20160
20161
20162
20163
20164
20165
20166
20167
20168
20169
20170
20171
20172
20173
20174
20175
20176
20177
20178
20179
20180
20181
20182
20183
20184
20185
20186
20187
20188
20189
20190
20191
20192
20193
20194
20195
20196
20197
20198
20199
20200
20201
20202
20203
20204
20205
20206
20207
20208
20209
20210
20211
20212
20213
20214
20215
20216
20217
20218
20219
20220
20221
20222
20223
20224
20225
20226
20227
20228
20229
20230
20231
20232
20233
20234
20235
20236
20237
20238
20239
20240
20241
20242
20243
20244
20245
20246
20247
20248
20249
20250
20251
20252
20253
20254
20255
20256
20257
20258
20259
20260
20261
20262
20263
20264
20265
20266
20267
20268
20269
20270
20271
20272
20273
20274
20275
20276
20277
20278
20279
20280
20281
20282
20283
20284
20285
20286
20287
20288
20289
20290
20291
20292
20293
20294
20295
20296
20297
20298
20299
20300
20301
20302
20303
20304
20305
20306
20307
20308
20309
20310
20311
20312
20313
20314
20315
20316
20317
20318
20319
20320
20321
20322
20323
20324
20325
20326
20327
20328
20329
20330
20331
20332
20333
20334
20335
20336
20337
20338
20339
20340
20341
20342
20343
20344
20345
20346
20347
20348
20349
20350
20351
20352
20353
20354
20355
20356
20357
20358
20359
20360
20361
20362
20363
20364
20365
20366
20367
20368
20369
20370
20371
20372
20373
20374
20375
20376
20377
20378
20379
20380
20381
20382
20383
20384
20385
20386
20387
20388
20389
20390
20391
20392
20393
20394
20395
20396
20397
20398
20399
20400
20401
20402
20403
20404
20405
20406
20407
20408
20409
20410
20411
20412
20413
20414
20415
20416
20417
20418
20419
20420
20421
20422
20423
20424
20425
20426
20427
20428
20429
20430
20431
20432
20433
20434
20435
20436
20437
20438
20439
20440
20441
20442
20443
20444
20445
20446
20447
20448
20449
20450
20451
20452
20453
20454
20455
20456
20457
20458
20459
20460
20461
20462
20463
20464
20465
20466
20467
20468
20469
20470
20471
20472
20473
20474
20475
20476
20477
20478
20479
20480
20481
20482
20483
20484
20485
20486
20487
20488
20489
20490
20491
20492
20493
20494
20495
20496
20497
20498
20499
20500
20501
20502
20503
20504
20505
20506
20507
20508
20509
20510
20511
20512
20513
20514
20515
20516
20517
20518
20519
20520
20521
20522
20523
20524
20525
20526
20527
20528
20529
20530
20531
20532
20533
20534
20535
20536
20537
20538
20539
20540
20541
20542
20543
20544
20545
20546
20547
20548
20549
20550
20551
20552
20553
20554
20555
20556
20557
20558
20559
20560
20561
20562
20563
20564
20565
20566
20567
20568
20569
20570
20571
20572
20573
20574
20575
20576
20577
20578
20579
20580
20581
20582
20583
20584
20585
20586
20587
20588
20589
20590
20591
20592
20593
20594
20595
20596
20597
20598
20599
20600
20601
20602
20603
20604
20605
20606
20607
20608
20609
20610
20611
20612
20613
20614
20615
20616
20617
20618
20619
20620
20621
20622
20623
20624
20625
20626
20627
20628
20629
20630
20631
20632
20633
20634
20635
20636
20637
20638
20639
20640
20641
20642
20643
20644
20645
20646
20647
20648
20649
20650
20651
20652
20653
20654
20655
20656
20657
20658
20659
20660
20661
20662
20663
20664
20665
20666
20667
20668
20669
20670
20671
20672
20673
20674
20675
20676
20677
20678
20679
20680
20681
20682
20683
20684
20685
20686
20687
20688
20689
20690
20691
20692
20693
20694
20695
20696
20697
20698
20699
20700
20701
20702
20703
20704
20705
20706
20707
20708
20709
20710
20711
20712
20713
20714
20715
20716
20717
20718
20719
20720
20721
20722
20723
20724
20725
20726
20727
20728
20729
20730
20731
20732
20733
20734
20735
20736
20737
20738
20739
20740
20741
20742
20743
20744
20745
20746
20747
20748
20749
20750
20751
20752
20753
20754
20755
20756
20757
20758
20759
20760
20761
20762
20763
20764
20765
20766
20767
20768
20769
20770
20771
20772
20773
20774
20775
20776
20777
20778
20779
20780
20781
20782
20783
20784
20785
20786
20787
20788
20789
20790
20791
20792
20793
20794
20795
20796
20797
20798
20799
20800
20801
20802
20803
20804
20805
20806
20807
20808
20809
20810
20811
20812
20813
20814
20815
20816
20817
20818
20819
20820
20821
20822
20823
20824
20825
20826
20827
20828
20829
20830
20831
20832
20833
20834
20835
20836
20837
20838
20839
20840
20841
20842
20843
20844
20845
20846
20847
20848
20849
20850
20851
20852
20853
20854
20855
20856
20857
20858
20859
20860
20861
20862
20863
20864
20865
20866
20867
20868
20869
20870
20871
20872
20873
20874
20875
20876
20877
20878
20879
20880
20881
20882
20883
20884
20885
20886
20887
20888
20889
20890
20891
20892
20893
20894
20895
20896
20897
20898
20899
20900
20901
20902
20903
20904
20905
20906
20907
20908
20909
20910
20911
20912
20913
20914
20915
20916
20917
20918
20919
20920
20921
20922
20923
20924
20925
20926
20927
20928
20929
20930
20931
20932
20933
20934
20935
20936
20937
20938
20939
20940
20941
20942
20943
20944
20945
20946
20947
20948
20949
20950
20951
20952
20953
20954
20955
20956
20957
20958
20959
20960
20961
20962
20963
20964
20965
20966
20967
20968
20969
20970
20971
20972
20973
20974
20975
20976
20977
20978
20979
20980
20981
20982
20983
20984
20985
20986
20987
20988
20989
20990
20991
20992
20993
20994
20995
20996
20997
20998
20999
21000
21001
21002
21003
21004
21005
21006
21007
21008
21009
21010
21011
21012
21013
21014
21015
21016
21017
21018
21019
21020
21021
21022
21023
21024
21025
21026
21027
21028
21029
21030
21031
21032
21033
21034
21035
21036
21037
21038
21039
21040
21041
21042
21043
21044
21045
21046
21047
21048
21049
21050
21051
21052
21053
21054
21055
21056
21057
21058
21059
21060
21061
21062
21063
21064
21065
21066
21067
21068
21069
21070
21071
21072
21073
21074
21075
21076
21077
21078
21079
21080
21081
21082
21083
21084
21085
21086
21087
21088
21089
21090
21091
21092
21093
21094
21095
21096
21097
21098
21099
21100
21101
21102
21103
21104
21105
21106
21107
21108
21109
21110
21111
21112
21113
21114
21115
21116
21117
21118
21119
21120
21121
21122
21123
21124
21125
21126
21127
21128
21129
21130
21131
21132
21133
21134
21135
21136
21137
21138
21139
21140
21141
21142
21143
21144
21145
21146
21147
21148
21149
21150
21151
21152
21153
21154
21155
21156
21157
21158
21159
21160
21161
21162
21163
21164
21165
21166
21167
21168
21169
21170
21171
21172
21173
21174
21175
21176
21177
21178
21179
21180
21181
21182
21183
21184
21185
21186
21187
21188
21189
21190
21191
21192
21193
21194
21195
21196
21197
21198
21199
21200
21201
21202
21203
21204
21205
21206
21207
21208
21209
21210
21211
21212
21213
21214
21215
21216
21217
21218
21219
21220
21221
21222
21223
21224
21225
21226
21227
21228
21229
21230
21231
21232
21233
21234
21235
21236
21237
21238
21239
21240
21241
21242
21243
21244
21245
21246
21247
21248
21249
21250
21251
21252
21253
21254
21255
21256
21257
21258
21259
21260
21261
21262
21263
21264
21265

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of Snakes, by Catherine Cooper Hopley</title>
     <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" />
    <style type="text/css">

body {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;}
div.limit   {max-width: 35em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}
div.chapter  {page-break-before: always;}
.f1      {font: 1em "Old English Text MT", serif;}
.vh      {visibility: hidden;}

    h1,h2,h3,h4  {text-align: center; clear: both;}

.ln1     {position: absolute; text-align: right; top: auto; margin-left: -1em;}

p      {margin-top: 0.2em; text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0em; text-indent: 1.5em;}
.pind  {text-indent: 0em; padding-left: 6em; font-size: 125%; font-weight: bold; margin-top: 0.7em; margin-bottom: 0.5em;}
.pn1   {margin-top: 1em; text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0em; text-indent: 0em;}
.pi2   {margin-top: 0em; padding-left: 2em; text-indent: 0em;}
.pi4   {text-indent: 0.2em; padding-left: 4em;}
.pi6   {text-indent: 0.2em; padding-left: 6em;}
.pi8   {text-indent: 0.2em; padding-left: 8em;}
.pi10  {text-indent: 0.2em; padding-left: 10em;}
.pch   {text-align: center; text-indent: 0em; font-size: 115%; margin-top: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 2em;}
.pc    {text-align: center; text-indent: 0em;}
.pc1   {margin-top: 1em; text-align: center; text-indent: 0em;}
.pc4   {margin-top: 4em; text-align: center; text-indent: 0em;}
.pp6s  {margin-top: 0em; font-size: 90%; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 0em; padding-left: 6em; text-indent: -0.35em;}
.pp10  {margin-top: 0em; font-size: 90%; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 0em; padding-left: 10em; text-indent: 0em;}
.pbq   {line-height: 1em; text-indent: 1.2em; font-size: 90%; margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 5%;}
.pni   {margin-top: 0.5em; font-size: 90%; text-align: left; margin-left: 5%; text-indent: -1em;}
.pnii  {margin-top: 0em; font-size: 90%; text-align: left; margin-left: 10%; text-indent: -1em;}
.pniii {margin-top: 0em; font-size: 90%; text-align: left; margin-left: 15%; text-indent: -1em;}
.pfn4  {margin-top: 1em; font-size: 90%; text-indent: 0em; margin-left: 4em; margin-right: 1em;}
.ptn   {margin-top: 0.3em;  text-indent: -1em; margin-left: 2%;}
.pr2   {margin-top: 0em; text-align: right; padding-right: 2em;}


.p1       {margin-top: 1em;}
.p2       {margin-top: 2em;}
.p4       {margin-top: 4em;}

.small   {font-size: 75%;}
.reduct  {font-size: 90%;}
.lmid    {font-size: 110%;}
.mid     {font-size: 125%;}
.large   {font-size: 150%;}
.elarge  {font-size: 175%;}

hr       {width: 33%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em; margin-left: 33.5%; margin-right: 33.5%; clear: both;}
hr.chap  {width: 65%; margin-left: 17.5%; margin-right: 17.5%;}

table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}
    .tdc      {text-align: center;}
    .tdl      {text-align: left;}
    .tdr      {text-align: right;}
    .tdl1     {text-align: left; padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -1.5em;}
    .tdrh     {text-align: right; vertical-align: top; padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;}
    .tdrl     {text-align: right; vertical-align: bottom; padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;}
    .tdlh     {text-align: left; padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -1.5em; vertical-align: top;}

#toc  {width: 80%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 1em; margin-top: 1em;}
#tb1  {width: 90%; font-size: 150%; line-height: 0.9em;}
#td1  {width: 90%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 0.9em; margin-top: 1em;}
#td2  {width: 80%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 0.9em; margin-top: 1em;}
#td3  {width: 80%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 0.9em; margin-top: 1em;}
#td4  {width: 50%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 0.9em; margin-top: 1em;}
#tc1  {width: 80%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 0.9em;}
#tc2  {width: 60%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 0.9em;}
#tc3  {width: 80%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 0.9em;}
#tc4  {width: 60%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 0.9em;}
#tc5  {width: 70%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 0.9em;}
#tc6  {width: 70%; font-size: 90%; line-height: 0.9em;}

.pagenum { /* visibility: hidden; */ position: absolute; left: 94%; color: gray;
          font-size: smaller; text-align: right; text-indent: 0em; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal;}

.smcap    {font-variant: small-caps;}
.caption  {font-weight: bold;}
.cf       {font-weight: bold; font-size: 90%;}

.p150     {width: 12em;}

.figcenter  {margin: auto; text-align: center; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em;}
.floatright {float: right;  clear: right; text-align: center; padding-left: 1em; padding-top: 1em; padding-bottom: 0.5em;}

.footnotes  {border: dashed 1px; padding: 1em;}
.label      {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;}
.fnanchor   {vertical-align: super; font-size: .8em; text-decoration: none; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal;}

p.drop-cap04 {padding-top: 2em; text-indent: -0.4em;}
p.drop-cap06 {padding-top: 2em; text-indent: -0.6em;}
p.drop-cap08 {padding-top: 2em; text-indent: -0.8em;}
p.drop-cap16 {padding-top: 2em; text-indent: -1.6em;}

p.drop-cap04:first-letter,
p.drop-cap06:first-letter,
p.drop-cap08:first-letter,
p.drop-cap16:first-letter
  {float: left; margin: 0.07em 0.1em 0em 0em; font-size: 480%; line-height:0.85em;}

@media handheld {p.drop-cap04:first-letter,
                 p.drop-cap06:first-letter,
                 p.drop-cap08:first-letter,
                 p.drop-cap16:first-letter
      {float: none; margin: 0; font-size: 100%;}
}

.transnote {background-color: #E6E6FA; color: black; font-size:smaller; padding:0.5em; margin-bottom:5em; font-family:sans-serif, serif; }

    hr.full { width: 100%;
              margin-top: 3em;
              margin-bottom: 0em;
              margin-left: auto;
              margin-right: auto;
              height: 4px;
              border-width: 4px 0 0 0; /* remove all borders except the top one */
              border-style: solid;
              border-color: #000000;
              clear: both; }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 53153 ***</div>
<h1>The Project Gutenberg eBook, Snakes, by Catherine Cooper Hopley</h1>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="0" style="background-color: #ccccff;margin: 0 auto;" cellpadding="10">
  <tr>
    <td valign="top">
      Note:
    </td>
    <td>
      Images of the original pages are available through
      Internet Archive/American Libraries. See
      <a href="https://archive.org/details/snakescuriositie00hopl">
      https://archive.org/details/snakescuriositie00hopl</a>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr class="full" />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<div class="limit">
<div class="chapter">
<div class="figcenter">
 <img src="images/cover.jpg" width="350" height="533" alt="" />
</div>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_i" id="Page_i">[i]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<p class="pc4 elarge">SNAKES:</p>

<p class="pc1 mid"><i>CURIOSITIES AND WONDERS OF SERPENT LIFE</i>.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ii" id="Page_ii">[ii]</a></span></p>

<p class="pc4 reduct"><i>Morrison &amp; Gibb, Edinburgh,<br />
Printers to Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.</i></p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/fr.jpg" width="400" height="252"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption">
<table id="tc1" summary="tc1">
 <tr>
  <td class="tdc">Hamadryad,<br /><i>Ophiophagus bungarus</i>.</td>
  <td class="tdc">Cobra,<br /><i>Naja tripudians</i>.</td>
  <td class="tdc">Rat Snake,<br /><i>Ptyas mucosus</i>.</td>
 </tr>
</table>
<table id="tc2" summary="tc2">
 <tr>
  <td class="tdc"><i>Echis carinata.</i>.</td>
  <td class="tdc">Reticulated Python,<br /><i>Python reticulatus</i>.</td>
  <td class="tdc"><i>Amphisbæna.</i></td>
 </tr>
</table>
<p class="pc">SOME OPHIDIANS AT HOME.<br /><span class="reduct">INDIA.</span></p>
</div></div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_iii" id="Page_iii">[iii]</a></span></p>

<h1 class="p4">SNAKES:<br />
<span class="small"><i>CURIOSITIES AND WONDERS OF SERPENT LIFE</i></span>.</h1>

<p class="pc4">BY</p>

<p class="pc1 large">CATHERINE C. HOPLEY,</p>

<p class="pc1 reduct">AUTHOR OF ‘SKETCHES OF THE OPHIDIANS,’ ‘LIFE IN THE SOUTH,’ ‘RAMBLES AND
ADVENTURES IN THE WILDS OF THE WEST,’ ETC. ETC.</p>


<p class="pi6 p4">‘These lithe and elegant Beings.’&mdash;<span class="smcap">Rymer Jones</span>.<br />

‘Can outswim the Fish and outclimb the Monkey.’&mdash;<span class="smcap"><span class="smcap">Owen</span></span>.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/logo.jpg" width="200" height="218"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>


<p class="pc4 large">GRIFFITH AND FARRAN,</p>
<p class="pc reduct">SUCCESSORS TO NEWBERY AND HARRIS,</p>
<p class="pc">WEST CORNER OF ST. PAUL’S CHURCHYARD, LONDON.<br />
E. P. DUTTON &amp; CO., NEW YORK.<br />
1882.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_iv" id="Page_iv">[iv]</a></span></p>

<p class="pc4 reduct"><i>The Rights of Translation and of Reproduction are reserved.</i></p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">[v]</a></span></p>


<p class="pc4"><i>TO MY<br />
MUCH HONOURED AND ESTEEMED FRIEND</i>,<br />
<span class="f1 mid">Professor Richard Owen, F.R.S.,<br /></span>
<i>WHO HAS GRACIOUSLY ENCOURAGED THE STUDIES<br />
OUT OF WHICH IT CAME;<br />
AND WHOSE CORDIAL SYMPATHY AND REGARD,<br />
WITH FRANKEST RECOGNITION OF HIS<br />
DEEP DEVOTION TO HIS ART,<br />
GAVE ONE OF ITS FEW GREAT PLEASURES TO THE<br />
SHORT LIFE OF<br />
A DEAR BROTHER OF MINE,<br />
THIS BOOK<br />
IS HUMBLY DEDICATED,<br />
WITH GRATEFUL RECOLLECTIONS OF THE PAST</i></p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">[vi]</a></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[vii]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-vii.jpg" width="500" height="113"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CONTENTS.</h2>


<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/b1.jpg" width="100" height="23"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<table id="toc" summary="cont">

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrl"><span class="small">CHAP.</span></td>
  <td>&nbsp;</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><span class="small">PAGE</span></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">I.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">SEEING A SNAKE FEED,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_27">27</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">II.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">SNAKES OF FICTION AND OF FACT,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_41">41</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">III.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">OPHIDIAN TASTE FOR BIRDS’ EGGS,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_59">59</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">IV.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">DO SNAKES DRINK?</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_75">75</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">V.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE TONGUE OF A SNAKE&mdash;PART I. WHAT IT IS ‘NOT,’</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_94">94</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">VI.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE TONGUE OF A SNAKE&mdash;PART II. WHAT IT ‘IS,’</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_107">107</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">VII.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE TONGUE OF A SNAKE&mdash;PART III. ITS USES,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_115">115</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">VIII.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE GLOTTIS,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_129">129</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">IX.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">BREATHING AND HISSING OF SNAKES,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_142">142</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">X.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">HIBERNATION,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_159">159</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XI.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE TAIL OF A SNAKE,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_170">170</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XII.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">OPHIDIAN ACROBATS: CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRICTION,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_192">192</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XIII.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">FRESH-WATER SNAKES,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_221">221</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XIV.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE PELAGIC OR SEA SNAKES,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_233">233</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XV.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">‘THE GREAT SEA SERPENT,’</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_247">247</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XVI.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">RATTLESNAKE HISTORY,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_268">268</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XVII.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE RATTLE,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_294">294</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XVIII.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE INTEGUMENT&mdash;‘HORNS,’ AND OTHER EPIDERMAL APPENDAGES,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_315">315</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XIX.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">DENTITION,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_342">342</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XX.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">VIPERINE FANGS,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_368">368</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XXI.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[viii]</a></span></td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE CROTALIDÆ,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_381">381</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XXII.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE XENODONS,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_395">395</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XXIII.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">OPHIDIAN NOMENCLATURE, AND VERNACULARS,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_413">413</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XXIV.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">DO SNAKES INCUBATE THEIR EGGS?</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_431">431</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XXV.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">ANACONDA AND ANGUIS FRAGILIS,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_452">452</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XXVI.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">‘LIZZIE,’</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_470">470</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XXVII.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">DO SNAKES AFFORD A REFUGE TO THEIR YOUNG?</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_483">483</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XXVIII.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">SERPENT WORSHIP, ‘CHARMING,’ ETC.,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_507">507</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XXIX.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">THE VENOMS AND THEIR REMEDIES,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_532">532</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdrh">XXX.</td>
  <td class="tdlh">NOTES FROM THE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_561">561</a></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td> </td>
  <td class="tdlh">INDEX,</td>
  <td class="tdrl"><a href="#Page_593">593</a></td>
 </tr>

</table>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-viii.jpg" width="200" height="243"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[1]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-001.jpg" width="500" height="109"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">INTRODUCTION.</h2>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/b2.jpg" width="100" height="31"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<p class="drop-cap04">TO the many friends who have repeatedly asked me, ‘What <i>could</i> induce
you to take up such a <i>horrid</i> subject as snakes?’ a few words of
explanation must be offered. Some words of apology are also due that
I, a learner myself, should aspire to instruct others. I cannot do
better, therefore, than tell the history of this book from its birth,
and in so doing cancel both obligations. The little history will be a
sort of <i>OPHIDIANA</i>, or gossip about snakes; and in this I only follow
the example of most herpetologists, who, when writing exclusively on
these reptiles, preface their work with some outline of the history of
ophiology, and generally with an excuse for introducing the unwelcome
subject at all. There is still reason to lament that traditional
prejudice invests everything in the shape of a serpent with repulsive
qualities, and that these prejudices are being only very slowly swept
away by the besom of science.</p>

<p>Serpents are intimately associated with our religious<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[2]</a></span> beliefs. Not
that we <i>worship</i> them! Far otherwise. Many excellent and orthodox
persons associate with a serpent all the sin and misery which ever
existed on our globe, and are persuaded that the sooner everything in
the shape of one is exterminated the better.</p>

<p>On the other hand, those who can look at a snake with unprejudiced eyes
and study its habits, find continual reason to wonder at and admire the
extraordinary features which exhibit themselves in its organization.
Owing to their retiring habits, many of them nocturnal, and partly in
consequence of preconceived errors, less is understood about them than
almost any other natural group of animals; therefore&mdash;as the reader
will discover&mdash;a student, when left to himself, has to wade through
ages of writers in order to find out what to believe regarding them.
Scientific ophiologists are still engaged in settling mooted questions
concerning them. But apart from science there is a glamour of poetry,
romance, and mystery about snakes, and not without reason. There has
been a great deal of what we may call ‘Drawing-room Natural History’
of late years&mdash;charmingly sensational and romantic; attractive also in
illustrations and colouring, but not always intended as reliable guides
for students.</p>

<p>All travellers are not naturalists; and though they may contribute
valuable information in one branch of science, it is possible they may
mislead in another; and from the very popularity of their books, such
errors are rapidly disseminated. I aspire to a place on drawing-room
tables for my book also, but let me assure my readers that my aim has
been to assist by diligent search to establish truthfulness.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[3]</a></span> Whatever
of romance or sensation attaches to it, is due to the marvellous powers
of the creatures who fill its pages, and whose true nature I have
laboured to comprehend.</p>

<p>Schlegel and Dumeril are two authorities on serpents much quoted by
English writers, and both give us a list of all the naturalists of
repute who have done service to herpetology, up to the date of their
works. As many of these are introduced in the body of my work, let
us glance at the progress of ophiology since the date of these two
distinguished authors. In zoology as much as in any branch of science
progressiveness is observable; and in zoology the advance of ophiology
has of late years been remarkable. In 1843, when Schlegel’s <i>Essai sur
la Physionomie des Serpents</i>, 1837, was translated into English by Dr.
Thos. Stewart Traill, of the University of Edinburgh, he mentioned as a
reason for curtailing the original (and not adding the atlas containing
421 figures, with charts and tables), that the low state of ophiology
in this country did not invite a larger work, and ‘deters booksellers
from undertaking such costly illustrations;’ but he hoped to be useful
to science by cultivating a branch of zoology hitherto neglected. Ten
years prior to that date, viz. 1833, the monthly scientific magazine
<i>The Zoologist</i> was started; in introducing which the Editor, Mr. Ed.
Newman, wrote: ‘To begin, the attempt to combine scientific truths with
readable English has been considered by my friends one of surpassing
rashness;’ that he had ‘many solicitations to desist from so hopeless
a task,’ and many ‘supplications to introduce a few Latin descriptions
to give it a scientific character,’ science being then<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[4]</a></span> confined to
the scientific alone. Nevertheless the <i>Zoologist</i> has survived half a
century, and under able editorship has taken its stand as a popular as
well as scientific journal. Formerly you might have hunted the pages of
such magazines year after year without finding mention of an ‘odious
snake;’ but within the last decade, not only this but other periodicals
have frequently opened their pages to ophiology, and a considerable
removal of prejudice is noticeable.</p>

<p>Mr. Newman felt encouraged by the success attending the publication
of White’s <i>Selborne</i>, that being one of the first works to induce a
practical study of nature. Yet, until the appearance of Bell’s <i>British
Reptiles</i> in 1849, our present subject occupied but very stinted space
in literature. Indeed, we must admit that as a nation we English have
<i>followed</i>, not <i>taken</i>, the lead as naturalists. So long ago as
1709, Lawson in his <i>History of Carolina</i> lamented the ‘misfortune
that most of our Travellers who go to this vast Continent are of the
meaner Sort, and generally of very slender Education; hired laborers
and merchants to trade among the Indians in remote parts.’ ... ‘The
French outstrip us in nice Observations,’ he said. ‘First by their
numerous Clergy; their Missionaries being obedient to their Superiors.’
Secondly by gentlemen accompanying these religious missions, sent out
to explore and make discoveries and to keep strict journals, which duly
were handed over to science. And what Lawson remarked of the American
colonies was extended to wherever the French, Portuguese, and Italians
established religious communities. We find our book-shelves ever
enriched by foreign naturalists.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[5]</a></span></p>

<p>In Germany, also, ophiology was far in advance of us. Lenz, Helmann,
Effeldt, and many others pursued the study practically; and produced
some valuable results in their printed works, which unfortunately are
too little known in England. Doubtless because we in England have so
few native reptiles, there is less inducement to concern ourselves
about them. Not so in America, where herpetology soon found many
enthusiasts; and the researches of Holbrooke, Emmons, De Kay, and Weir
Mitchell were published within a few years of each other. Dr. Cantor
in India, and Dr. Andrew Smith in South Africa, Drs. Gray and Günther
and P. H. Gosse in England, all enriched ophiological literature
previous to 1850, to say nothing of the valuable additions to the
science dispersed among the <i>Reports</i> and <i>Transactions</i> of the various
scientific Societies. After the appearance of Dr. Günther’s important
work, <i>The Reptiles of British India</i>, in 1864, published under the
auspices of the Ray Society, another fresh impetus was observable, and
we had Krefft’s <i>Snakes of Australia</i>, 1869; <i>Indian Snakes</i>, by Dr. E.
Nicholson, 1870; culminating in <i>The Thanatophidia of India</i>, by Sir
Joseph, then Dr. Fayrer, F.R.S., C.S.I., etc., Surgeon-Major of the
Bengal Army, in 1872, which brings me to the commencement of my own
studies.</p>

<p>A few years ago, I knew nothing whatever about snakes; and to them,
though deriving my chief pleasures from an inherited love of all
things in nature, a faint interest <i>at a respectful distance</i>, was
all I accorded. In Virginia and Florida, where a country life and a
gorgeous flora enticed my steps into wild and secluded districts, we
not unfrequently<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[6]</a></span> saw them and one or two ‘narrow escapes’ seasoned
the pages of my notebook. When in such rambles we caught sight of one,
we flew at our utmost speed, encountering the far greater danger of
treading on a venomous one in our precipitous flight, than in shunning
the probably innocent one from which we were fleeing.</p>

<p>My first startling adventure in Virginia was more ridiculous than
dangerous. We were about to cross a little rivulet that ran rippling
through a wood, in which there were many such to ford. Often fallen
boughs or drifting logs, dragged into the shallow parts by the negroes,
served as stepping-stones. These becoming blackened in the water, and
partially covered with tangled drift-weed, were so familiar a sight
that, without pausing to observe, I was making a spring, when my
companion caught hold of my dress, crying out, ‘Don’t step on them!
They will bite you!’ The supposed shining and tangled boughs were
two large black snakes commonly known as ‘Racers,’ enjoying a bath;
but until I had hastily regained the top of the bank, alarmed at the
excitement of my young friend, I did not discover the nature of our
intended stepping-stones. The snakes were not venomous, but very
‘spiteful,’ and might have resented the interruption by sharp bites. In
moving, they probably would have caused me to fall upon them and into
the water, when they might have attacked me with unpleasant results.
Now, however, my chief vexation was that they got away so quickly, I
could learn nothing about them.</p>

<p>Another ‘escape’ was on an intensely hot day, when in early morning
we had started for a botanical ramble. Our<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[7]</a></span> way lay along a sloping
bit of pasture land, bounded on the east and higher ground by a dense
wood, which afforded shelter from the sun. Beguiled on and on, among
the lovely copses of exquisite flowering shrubs and a wealth of floral
treasures which carpeted the turfy slopes, we were unconscious of time.</p>

<p>Though only in the merry month of May, blackberries of enormous size
and delicious flavour, trailing on long briars yards and yards over the
mossy grass, invited us to break our fast; and, all unmindful of the
breakfast-hour, we feasted and rested.</p>

<p>Suddenly we found ourselves no longer shaded by the wood to the east
of us, for the sun had mounted high; and at the first touch of his
scorching rays as we rose to our feet, we glanced at each other in
dismay, for we had open ground to cross in getting home. My Virginia
companion said that it would be better to ford the streams in the wood,
than risk sunstroke by crossing a cornfield, our nearest way home.</p>

<p>This we decided to do, and having surmounted all obstacles, were almost
within earshot of the house, when Ella, with a shriek, started and ran
back, exclaiming, ‘A moccasin!’</p>

<p>‘What? where?’ I eagerly inquired, trying to follow the direction of
her eye.</p>

<p>‘Oh, Miss Hopley, come back! Quick! Come away! Water moccasins are
worse than rattlesnakes, for they dart at you!’</p>

<p>Sufficiently alarming, certainly; yet I wanted to <i>see</i> the terrible
object, and ascertain how far off it was, and at length discovered
the head and neck of a snake erect.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[8]</a></span> About a foot of it was visible,
and might have been taken for a slight stem or stick standing
perpendicularly out of the swampy herbage bordering the narrow path.
The fixed eyes and darting ‘sting’&mdash;which I then thought the tongue to
be&mdash;seemed to endorse the character my young friend had given it. Yet
I lingered, ‘fascinated,’ no doubt, by its gaze, the fascination in my
case partaking of curiosity chiefly. The reptile remained so rigid that
I was inclined to venture nearer; nor did I welcome the idea of having
to retrace our steps and risk the open field under that Virginia sun.
But Ella would not hear of passing the deadly snake. There were others,
she was sure, in that swampy part.</p>

<p>Well, we reached home at last, more dead than alive, having discarded
our treasured specimens and substituted sprays of enormous leaves with
which to shield our heads from the sun. And I have ever reflected, that
of the two dangers&mdash;snakes and sunstroke&mdash;we risked the greater in
traversing that cornfield at such an hour.</p>

<p>Besides that ‘deadly moccasin’ and frequent ‘black snakes,’ there
were ‘whip snakes,’ ‘milk snakes,’ and many others which the negroes
would bring home as trophies of their courageous slaughter; but by no
scientific names were they known there. Except this name <i>moccasin</i>
or <i>mokeson</i>, which probably conveyed some especial meaning to the
aborigines, few of the Indian vernaculars have been preserved in the
United States, as we find them in other parts of America, which latter
are treated of in chapters xxii. and xxiii. of this work; but common
English names prevail.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[9]</a></span></p>

<p>After a time I proposed to write a book about snakes, starting with the
stereotyped ideas that they all ‘stung’ in some incomprehensible way;
that the larger kinds crushed up horses and cattle like wisps of straw;
and that all, having viciously taken the life of the victim, proceeded
with epicurean gusto to lick it all over and smear it with saliva, that
it might glide down their throat like an oyster! There are those who to
this day believe the same.</p>

<p>My proposed book was, however, simply to recount some adventures
among the snakes which were encountered in our American rambles. It
was intended for the amusement of juvenile readers, and to supplement
the little work about my pet birds<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a>, which had met with so kind and
encouraging a reception.</p>

<p>But in order to merely recount an adventure with a snake, some
knowledge of the reptile is essential. One must, at least, be sure
of the correct name of the ‘horrid thing’ which lifted its ‘menacing
head’ a few feet in front of us; such local names as ‘black snake’ and
‘moccasin snake’ affording no satisfactory information.</p>

<p>Nor were hasty references to books much more satisfactory. Mr. P. H.
Gosse had been over the same ground, gathering many interesting items
of natural history; but in his <i>Letters from Alabama</i> I could not
decide on my moccasin snake. From this and his other works, and then
from the authors quoted by him, I discovered only that there were
many ‘black snakes,’ some deadly, others harmless. The same with the
‘moccasin’ snake, which was now of this colour, now of that. While one
writer expatiates on the beauty of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[10]</a></span> the ‘emerald snake,’ a ‘living
gem, which the dark damsels of southern climes wind round their necks
and arms,’ another describes snakes of emerald green which are dreaded
and avoided. One traveller tells of a ‘coral snake’ whose bite is
fatal within an hour; while elsewhere a ‘coral snake’ is petted and
handled. Equally perplexing were the ‘carpet snakes,’ ‘whip snakes,’
‘Jararacas,’ and ‘brown snakes.’</p>

<p>Nor were names the only puzzle to unravel; for in almost every other
particular writers on snakes are at variance.</p>

<p>Those ‘moccasin snakes’ in Virginia were venomous, I was sure, having
known of accidents from their bite. Hoping to become enlightened as to
their true name and character, I repaired to the Zoological Gardens to
ascertain if they were known there. Yes; there were several together
in one cage, labelled ‘Moccasins’ (<i>Tropidonotus fasciatus</i>) ‘from
America;’ but to identify them with the one in Virginia, of which I
had seen only a short portion from a distance, was impossible. To add
to the perplexity, Holland the keeper assured me these were ‘quite
harmless.’</p>

<p>‘But are you <i>sure</i> these are harmless snakes? They are poisonous in
America.’</p>

<p>‘Well, miss, they have bitten my finger often enough for me to know,’
returned Holland.</p>

<p>‘Then there must be <i>two</i> kinds of moccasin snakes,’ I argued, ‘for
the others are <i>extremely</i> venomous;’ and I related my Virginia
experiences, and that I had known of a horse bitten by one that had
died in an hour or so, fearfully swollen.</p>

<p>‘They have never hurt me,’ persisted Holland.</p>

<p>Subsequently I discovered that in the United States this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[11]</a></span> name
<i>moccasin</i> is a common vernacular, first and chiefly applied to a
really dangerous viper, <i>Ancistrodon pugnax</i> or <i>piscivorus</i>, the
one, most likely, that we saw in the wood; and secondly, to a number
of harmless snakes which are <i>supposed</i> to be dangerous, and of which
those at the Gardens, <i>Tropidonotus fasciatus</i>, are among the latter.
Thus at the very outset the puzzles began.</p>

<p>Nevertheless, after some research I learnt enough of snake nature to
feel safe in proceeding with my book of <i>Adventures</i>, and in presenting
it to a publisher.</p>

<p>‘As a gift-book no one would look at it, and as an educational work
there would be no demand for it,’ was its encouraging reception.</p>

<p>This was about ten years ago; and so far from inducing me to relinquish
the subject, I began to aspire to become a means of assisting to
overcome these prejudices. For the space of two years the anticipated
‘sequel’ to my <i>American Pets</i> went the round of the London publishers
of juvenile works, and to several in Scotland. It was read by many
of them, who professed to have been unexpectedly and ‘extremely
interested’ in it&mdash;‘<i>but</i>’&mdash;none could be persuaded to ‘entertain so
repulsive a subject.’ One member of a publishing house distinguished
for the high standard of its literature, positively admitted among
his insurmountable objections, that when a child his mother had never
permitted him to look through a certain favourite volume late in
the day, ‘for fear the pictures of snakes in it should prevent his
sleeping!’</p>

<p>An editor of a magazine told me he should lose his subscribers if he
put snakes in its pages; and another made<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[12]</a></span> excuse that his children
would not look at the magazine with a snake in it.</p>

<p>Perhaps this is not so surprising when we reflect that until within
a late date snakes in children’s books, if represented at all,
are depicted as if with full intent of creating horror. They are
represented with enormously extended jaws, and&mdash;by comparison with
the surrounding trees or bushes&mdash;of several hundred feet in length;
sometimes extending up a bank or over a hedge into the next field, or
winding round a rock or a gnarled trunk, that must be&mdash;if the landscape
have any pretensions to perspective&mdash;a long way off. Slender little
tree snakes of two or three feet long are represented winding round
and round thick stems and branches strong enough to support you. Into
the chasm of a mouth from which an enormous instrument (intended for a
tongue) is protruding, a deer the size of a squirrel (by comparison),
or a squirrel the size of a mouse, is on the point of running meekly to
its doom.</p>

<p>No wonder children ‘skip’ the few pages devoted to snakes in
their natural history books, and grow up full of ignorance and
prejudices regarding them. In no class of literature are original and
conscientious illustrations more required than to replace some of those
which reappear again and again, and have passed down from encyclopædias
into popular works, conveying the same erroneous impressions to each
unthinking reader.</p>

<p>The strongly-expressed opinions of publishers convinced me that the
prejudices of adults must first be overcome before children could be
persuaded to look at a snake as they would look at a bird or a fish,
or to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[13]</a></span> enter the Reptile House at the Zoological Gardens without the
premeditated ‘Aughs!’ and ‘Ughs!’ and shudders.</p>

<p>During the two years that witnessed the MS. of <i>Aunt Jenny’s
Adventures</i> lying in first one and then another publishing house, an
especial occurrence acted as a great stimulant, and induced an almost
obstinate persistence in my apparently hopeless studies.</p>

<p>This was the sensation caused by the daily papers in reporting the
case of ‘Cockburn <i>versus</i> Mann;’ and the ‘SNAKES IN CHANCERY.’ To
the horror and dismay of the ‘general public,’ Mr. Mann, of Chelsea,
was represented as ‘keeping for his amusement <i>all manner of venomous
serpents</i>;’ or, as another paper put it, ‘Mr. Mann had a peculiar
penchant for keeping as domestic pets a large number of venomous
snakes.’ (I copy verbatim from the papers of that date.) That these
‘water vipers and puff adders’ were ‘apt to stray in search of
freedom;’ or, ‘being accustomed to take their walks abroad,’ had
strayed into the neighbours’ gardens, to the terror of maid-servants
and children;’ and were ‘now roaming up and down Cheyne Walk,’ and
‘turning the College groves into a garden of Eden.’ So an action was
brought against Mr. Mann: for the neighbours decided that ‘there was no
better remedy for a stray cobra than a suit in Chancery.’ ‘Everybody’
during July 1872 was reading those delightfully sensational articles,
and asking, ‘<i>Have</i> you heard about Mr. Mann’s cobras?’</p>

<p>Mr. Frank Buckland was brave enough to venture into the dangerous
precincts of Cheyne Walk, and even into the house of Mr. Mann, to test
the virtues and vices of both the ‘pets’ and their possessors. He
finally tranquillized the public<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[14]</a></span> mind by publishing accounts of his
visit, affirming that not <i>one</i> of the snakes was venomous, but, on
the contrary, were charmingly interesting and as tame as kittens. The
testimony of so popular an authority served not only to allay local
terrors, but to modify the sentence that might otherwise have been
passed on the ophiophilist, who was merely cautioned by the honourable
judge to keep his pets within due bounds.</p>

<p>After this, Mr. and Mrs. Mann and their domesticated ophidians held
daily receptions. I was invited to see them, and in company with a
clerical friend repaired to Chelsea. It was the first family party
of snakes I had ever joined, and I must confess to considerable
fluctuations of courage as we knocked at the door. Nor could one quite
divest oneself of apprehension lest the boa-constrictors to which we
were introduced should suddenly make a spring and constrict us into a
pulp. But they didn’t. On the contrary, towards ourselves they were
disappointingly undemonstrative, and only evinced their consciousness
of the presence of strangers by entwining themselves about the members
of the family, as if soliciting their protection. They were very
jealous of each other, Mr. Mann said; jealous also of other company, as
if unwilling to lose their share of attention. There were half-a-dozen
or more snakes&mdash;viz., several boas, of whom ‘Cleo,’ or Cleopatra, has
become historical; two or three lacertine snakes from North Africa; and
a common English snake. The smaller ones were regaled on frogs for our
special edification. At that time I had never been to the Reptilium at
the Zoological Gardens on feeding days, and when Mr. Mann permitted a
frog to hop about the table, and we saw<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[15]</a></span> the ring snake glide swiftly
towards it and catch it in its mouth, we could not comprehend what was
to happen next. ‘What <i>will</i> he do with it?’ we both exclaimed. We had
not long to wait. Somehow or other the frog, caught by its hind leg,
got turned round till its head was in the snake’s mouth and the hind
legs were sprawling and kicking, but in vain. Then head-foremost it
vanished by degrees into the jaws of the snake; while the head of the
latter, ‘poor thing,’ seemed dislocated out of all shape! It was a
wonderful but painful sight; for how the snake’s head stretched in that
amazing manner, and how the frog was drawn into the mouth, was past our
comprehension.</p>

<p>An equally wonderful but far more attractive sight was Mrs. Mann,
a graceful and charming little lady in black velvet, with Cleo
coiling around her in Laocoon-like curves. The rich colouring of the
beautifully-marked reptile entwining the slender form of the woman, the
picturesque and caressing actions of Cleo, and the responsive repose
of Mrs. Mann as the snake was now round her waist, now undulating
around and over her head and neck, was altogether a sight never to
be forgotten. Two sweet little children were equally familiar with
the other boas, that seemed quite to know who were their friends and
play-fellows, for the children handled them and patted and talked to
them as we talk to pet birds and cats.</p>

<p>Such were the ‘vipers, cobras, and puff adders’ that had figured in the
daily papers.</p>

<p>After this, the reptile house at the Zoological Gardens became a
new attraction. From there to the bookshelves and back again to the
Gardens, my little book of adventures<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[16]</a></span> was discarded for a more
ambitious work; but still was confronted by disaffected publishers,
whom even the Chelsea snakes failed to convince of public interest.</p>

<p>Friends protested&mdash;and still demand&mdash;even while I write&mdash;‘How <i>can</i>
you give your mind to such odious, loathsome, slimy creatures?’ and
I boldly reply, ‘In the hope of inducing you to believe that they
are <i>not</i> odious and loathsome, and especially not “slimy,” but in
the majority graceful, useful, beautiful, <i>wonderful</i>!’ And I invite
them to accompany me to the Zoological Gardens, and endeavour there
to contemplate a reptile as they look at the other denizens of the
Gardens, simply as a member of the wide family of the brute creation,
appointed by the Great All-wise to live and feed and enjoy existence
as much as the rest, and that have to accomplish the purpose for which
they were created equally with the feathered families which we admire
and&mdash;devour!</p>

<p>And as whatever may be original or novel in this book has been obtained
at the Zoological Gardens, I now invite my readers to accompany me in
imagination to the Ophidarium, where we may learn how that little ring
snake was able to swallow his prodigious mouthful without separating it
limb from limb, as a carnivorous mammal would divide the lamb it has
killed.</p>

<p>‘But’&mdash;you exclaim in horror&mdash;‘we do not wish to contemplate so
painful, so repulsive a spectacle! How <i>could</i> you, how <i>can</i> you,
stand coolly there and see that poor frog tortured and swallowed alive?’</p>

<p>Dear, tender-hearted reader, I did not, I <i>could</i> not, unmoved,
contemplate this sight at first; nor for a very<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[17]</a></span> long while could I
bring myself to watch a living creature being drawn into that living
trap. Nor could we&mdash;you and I&mdash;feel aught but horror in visiting a
slaughter-house and watching a poor calf slowly die. Nor could we, for
pleasure merely, look coolly on at a painful surgical operation. Yet we
know that such things must be. The life of the snake is as important
as that of the frog. If we are to talk about cruelty, this book of
natural history, and of intended&mdash;let me say, of hoped-for&mdash;usefulness,
would become one of political economy instead. We might discuss the
sport of the angler, the huntsman; the affairs of the War Office;
of railroad managers and of road-makers; the matters of the Society
for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; followed by an examination
into the questions that have been ventilated in so-called ‘benevolent
organs;’ and how some of them employ writers who in every tenth line
betray their ignorance of the creatures they attempt to describe. Not
even theology could be dispensed with in this work; for, since the time
when Adam was told to have ‘dominion over the fish of the sea, and
over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon
the earth,’ the question of ‘cruelty’ has never been satisfactorily
solved. Morally and broadly, let us understand it to mean <i>unnecessary</i>
torture&mdash;pain and suffering that can be <i>avoided</i>, and which offers
a very wide scope indeed. In the animal world, ‘every creature is
destined to be the food of some other creature;’ and by these economies
only is the balance of nature maintained. Happily we are spared the
too vivid realization of the destruction of life ceaselessly going on
throughout creation; the myriads of insects destroyed each moment by
birds, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[18]</a></span> sufferings inflicted by the feline families and by birds
of prey, the countless shoals of the smaller fish devoured&mdash;swallowed
<i>alive</i> too!&mdash;by larger ones, or caught (and not too tenderly) for
our own use. These things we dismiss from our minds, and accept as
inevitable. We do not ventilate them in daily journals. Nor do we
take our children to the slaughter-house or the surgery for their
entertainment; or repair thither ourselves for the sake of minutely
discussing afterwards the sufferings we have witnessed. You will,
I hope, discover that the pain inflicted by the constrictor or the
viper is not, after all, so acute as it is by some imagined to be. The
venomous bite of the latter causes almost immediate insensibility; the
frog which the ring snake ate probably died of suffocation, which also
produces insensibility; the constriction of the boa&mdash;in its natural
condition&mdash;produces also a speedy death. Besides, as Dr. Andrew Wilson,
in a paper on this subject, has explained to us, the sufferings of a
frog or a rat are not like <i>our</i> sufferings. Their brain and nerves are
of a lower order.<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a></p>

<p>Permit me, therefore, in the outset, to dismiss from these pages the
question of cruelty as not being a branch of zoology; and as we cannot
prevent snakes from eating frogs, or the vipers from catching field
mice (nor need we wish to do so, or the small quarry would soon become
too many for us), let us examine the curious construction of a snake’s
head and jaw-bones that enables it to accomplish the task so easily.</p>

<p>With reference to the rapid development of science, it has<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[19]</a></span> been said
that a scientific work is old as soon as the printer’s ink is dry. Up
to the moment of sending my concluding pages to press, I realize this;
and remarkably so in the growing interest in the Ophidia. Writings on
this subject are becoming so frequent that, while correcting proofs, I
am tempted to add footnotes enough almost for another volume.</p>

<p>Several circumstances have combined to enrich ophiological literature
within a few years; one which, in 1872, I quite think established a
sort of new era in this branch of zoology, was the appearance of Dr.
Fayrer’s magnificent work, <i>The Thanatophidia of India</i>. Mr. Bullen,
then the Superintendent of the Reading-Room at the British Museum,
knowing that the subject was engaging my attention, informed me of the
arrival of this book, and, with his ever kind thought for students,
ordered it into the room for my express use; and I think I may affirm,
that I was the very first ‘reader’ who had the privilege of inspecting
the work, and, I hope, of helping to make it popular. For as day after
day those huge folio leaves stood open, with the conspicuous and
lifelike illustrations almost moving before your eyes, readers would
linger and gaze, acquaintances would stop to inquire and inspect; some
with a shudder would ask ‘how on earth I could endure the sight of such
fearful creatures?’ while a few would manifest sufficient interest and
intelligence to be indulged with a full display, and to whom I eagerly
aired my convictions of the tremendous errors afloat concerning the
snake tribe.</p>

<p>‘Beyond the pale of science but little is known of Ophiology,’ were
Fayrer’s words. Two years previously<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[20]</a></span> to this, in 1870, Dr. Edward
Nicholson wrote his book, <i>Indian Snakes</i>, ‘in the hope of dispelling
the lamentable ignorance regarding some of the <i>most beautiful and
harmless</i> of God’s creatures.’</p>

<p>This enthusiasm is gradually spreading, and we now not unfrequently
hear of domesticated snakes in English homes; both from friends
who keep them, and from the correspondence of the <i>Field, Land and
Water</i>, and similar papers, in whose columns inquiries for information
are often made regarding ophidian pets. Lord Lilford, one of the
kindest patrons of the London Reptilium, has, I believe, for many
years been a practical ophiologist. There is one little favourite
snake that figures in these pages of which his lordship gave an
excellent character from personal acquaintance, ‘the beautiful species
<i>Elaphis-quater-radiatus</i>, as being the most naturally tame of all the
colubrines, never hissing or trying to bite though frequently handled.’
A noble lady not long since carried a pet snake to the Gardens. It was
twined round her arm, where it remained quiet and content, though to
the alarm of some monkeys who caught sight of it. Some members of our
Royal Family, with the enlightened intelligence which displays itself
in them all, have more than once paid visits to the Reptile House at
the Zoological Gardens, where the keeper has enjoyed the high honour of
taking snakes out of their cages to place in royal hands. The good-will
and interest towards the inmates of the Ophidarium are likewise
displayed by some country gentlemen in presents of game, in the form
of ring snakes for the Ophiophagus and frogs for the lesser fry. Lord
Arthur Russell, Lord Lilford, and other<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[21]</a></span> distinguished personages set
excellent examples of this kind. All of which proofs of prejudices
overcome are features in the history of ophiology, and especially in
the last decade.</p>

<p>Then, in glancing at recent literature, a great change is discernible,
more particularly so during the last two years, since the popular
contributions of Dr. Arthur Stradling, a corresponding member of the
Zoological Society, have imparted a novel interest to this branch of
zoology. To this gentleman my own most grateful acknowledgments are
due, as will be evident to the reader, not only for the zest imparted
by his correspondence from Brazil, but for some important specimens
presented to me by him, which have enabled me to describe them
minutely from personal observations, as well as to add some original
illustrations from them. Though my work and my studies were far
advanced, previous to his valued acquaintance, yet I have been able to
enrich my pages from his experience, and have added footnotes from his
published writings.</p>

<p>Already, however, some few dispassionate students of nature among
editors were promoters of herpetology, and I must here express my
acknowledgments to the talented daughters of the lamented Mrs. Alfred
Gatty (and editresses of that <i>facile princeps</i> among juvenile
periodicals, <i>Aunt Judy’s Magazine</i>), for having been the first
to encourage and accept from my pen a snake in their pages, and
subsequently several papers on ophidian manners and habits for their
magazine.</p>

<p>In preparing ‘Sketches of the Ophidians’ for the <i>Dublin University
Magazine</i>, December 1875, and January and February 1876 (in all, about
forty closely-written pages), I, by request of the editor, included
a paper on the venom<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[22]</a></span> and the various remedies, though, reluctant to
intrude within the arena of professional science, a sort of summing
up of evidence was all that I attempted. Having been thus required to
glean some crude ideas from technical writings (which necessitated
glossaries and dictionaries to be ever at hand), I again add a chapter
on the ‘Venoms’ to my present work. Left entirely to my own independent
conclusions, if I have ventured to think in opposition to some popular
writers, and have even presumed to offer some suggestions of my own, I
trust I may be treated with clemency.</p>

<p>With regard to the terrible death-rate from snake-bite in India, it
does, however, appear to me that journalists who hold up their hands
in horror, and write strong articles on this subject, lose sight of
the religious and social condition of the low-caste Hindûs, who are
the chief sufferers, and whose superstition is so fatal to them.
<i>Snake-worship</i> is the root of the evil! <i>Education</i> must lower the
death-rate. During the visit of H.R.H. the Prince of Wales to India,
the entire programme was on one occasion interrupted because some
Hindû children, to whom a feast was to be given, could not eat in
the presence of Christians, whose ‘shadow would have polluted their
food,’ or some obstacle of this nature. Similar difficulties arise when
they are snake-bitten; their creed prohibits their having recourse to
approved remedies. ‘Snake-charmers’ and native quacks are sent for
instead, and often when cures are possible the fatalists submit to
death.</p>

<p>To Professor Owen, who six years ago permitted me the honour of
dedicating this contemplated work to him, and to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[23]</a></span> others who were then
led to expect its early appearance, I may be allowed to offer an excuse
for tardiness. Like the creatures which fill its pages, I succumb to
the chills of winter, and depend on the suns of summer for renewed
vigour and activity. At one time impaired health, and the enforced
suspension of literary pursuits under the threatened loss of the use of
my right hand, were grievous interruptions.</p>

<p>Filial duties and domestic bereavements caused another two years’
delay. Banished to the seaside, and the pen prohibited during the
winter of 1874-75, I had almost despaired of turning my studies to
account, when a new impulse arrived in the shape of a note from the
editor of <i>Chambers’s Journal</i>, begging to know if my ‘work on the
Ophidia was out, and by whom published’? My ‘work on the Ophidia’?
Could that mean my poor, despised little book that had been long ago
submitted among others to those Edinburgh publishers? <i>My work on the
Ophidia!</i> I began to get better from that day; and from that date,
March 1875, I have had the inexpressible pleasure and privilege of
including among my kindest and most sympathetic ophiological friends,
the Editor of that popular journal. On the Ophidia, he entrusted me
with work in various directions, encouraged by which I again returned
to town, and to the Zoological Gardens.</p>

<p>If I am so fortunate as to afford instruction or entertainment in the
following pages, my readers will join me in congratulating ourselves
on the possession of so large and valuable a zoological collection as
that in the Regent’s Park, without which this book could not have been
attempted. And I may embrace this opportunity of expressing<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[24]</a></span> my sincere
thanks to the President and Council of the Zoological Society for the
privileges and facilities afforded me at their Gardens, where not only
the Reptilium but the annual series of zoological lectures there, given
by the first biologists of the day, have been of inexpressible use to
me.</p>

<p>I would also express my thanks to Professor Flower, Hunterian Professor
at the Royal College of Surgeons, London, for his invariable courtesy
in facilitating my examination of the ophiological specimens in the
museum of that College, to which my honoured father (himself a member)
attributed all the love of the study of natural history which from our
earliest recollections were encouraged in his children. My thanks are
also due to Dr. Günther of the British Museum for similar facilities
there. Indeed, the words of encouragement given me, no less than six
years ago, by the distinguished heads of the zoological department
of our great national collection, sustained my courage in opposition
to all counter influences <i>outside</i> the British Museum. When first
contemplating and presenting some outline of this work to Dr. Günther,
he honoured me by expressing his opinion that such a book was ‘much
needed;’ that it would be ‘extremely useful and interesting.’ He was
even so kind as to promise to state this opinion in writing to any
publisher who might consult him on the subject. I here claim the
pleasure of thanking my present publishers for dispensing with the
necessity of troubling Dr. Günther, and for entrusting me with the
preparation of this book, which, before a chapter of it was completed,
they engaged to publish. Deficient as I feel it to be, it is at length
launched on the doubtful waters of public criticism.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[25]</a></span> If any scientific
eyes honour it with a glance, they will with clemency remember that,
with no scientific knowledge whatever to start with, I have had to
grope my way unaided, plodding over technicalities which in themselves
were studies; and if, as no doubt is the case, any misapprehension of
such technicalities has here and there crept in and misinterpreted the
true meaning, I anxiously trust that the truth has not been altogether
obliterated by such obscurities.</p>

<p>In conclusion, let me not omit a grateful tribute to the invariable
kindness of the heads of the Reading-Room at the British Museum;
and for their assistance in obtaining books of which I might never
have known. The kindness of Mr. Garnett extended even beyond the
Reading-Room; for while I was invalided at the seaside, and could only
read, <i>not write</i>, he translated and forwarded to me some important
pages from Lenz, a German ophiologist. To him, therefore, the thanks of
the reader are also due.</p>

<p>In the choice of illustrations my aim has been rather to exemplify a
few leading features than to attract by brilliantly-figured examples.
Some of the woodcuts are borrowed from Günther’s and Fayrer’s works;
others I have drawn faithfully from natural specimens; but in them
all I am indebted to the kind and patient work of Mr. A. T. Elwes in
reproducing my own imperfect attempts. And as it was impossible to draw
a snake <i>in action</i> from life, or to witness a second time the precise
coils or movements which had at first struck me as remarkable, the
composition of some of these subjects was by no means an easy one. Our
united efforts have been to represent the natural actions as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[26]</a></span> far as
possible, and this I hope may commend them to the reader.</p>

<p>There are few English persons who have not relatives in India,
Australia, America, and Africa, and from whom they are continually
hearing of escapes or accidents from snakes. Many letters from these
friends beyond the seas find place in the columns of the daily
journals. Whether, therefore, naturalists or not, a very large class of
the intelligent public claims an anxious interest in the Serpent race,
and to all of whom my OPHIDIANA or snake gossip is hopefully addressed.</p>

<p class="pr2">CATHERINE C. HOPLEY.</p>

<p class="reduct"><span class="smcap">London</span>, <i>October 1882</i>.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-026.jpg" width="200" height="206"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[27]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-027.jpg" width="500" height="106"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<p class="pc4 elarge">SNAKES:</p>

<p class="pc1 lmid"><i>CURIOSITIES AND WONDERS OF SERPENT LIFE.</i></p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/b1.jpg" width="100" height="23"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER I.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>SEEING A SNAKE FEED.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">IN any person who for the first time witnesses a snake with prey
just captured, the predominant feeling must be one of surprise at
the seemingly unmanageable size of the animal it has seized; and he
probably exclaims to himself, or to his companion, as we did on the
occasion described in the introduction, ‘What will he do with it?’
Let us again take our common ring snake, <i>Coluber natrix</i>, that ate a
frog for our edification; only, in the present instance, instead of
seeing a tame snake in a private residence at Chelsea, we will suppose
ourselves to be watching one on the banks of a stream in fine summer
weather. A slight movement in the grass causes us to turn our eyes
towards the spot, and we are just in time to see the quick dash, and
the next instant a recalcitrant frog held<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[28]</a></span> aloft in the jaws of a snake
that with elevated head glides up the bank. Coluber’s head is no bigger
than a filbert, and the frog is nearly full grown, its body inflated
to twice its original size, and its legs, of impracticable length and
angles, kicking remonstrantly.</p>

<p>‘How in the world is the snake going to manage it?’ again you exclaim,
and your amazement is not exceptional. It is what has been witnessed
and heard weekly in London when the public were admitted to the
Reptilium on feeding days, and it is what the reader will recall in his
own case when first informed that a snake was going to swallow that
monstrous mouthful undivided.</p>

<p>In the present instance, the injury to froggie’s feelings thus far
partakes more of moral than of physical pain, for the grasp of the
snake is not violent, and he finds that the more he struggles the
more he injures himself. Yet he kicks and struggles on, at thus being
forcibly detained against his will. In the mouth of the snake he is
as proportionately large as the shoulder of mutton in the jaws of
the dog that has just stolen it from the butcher’s shop. How do the
canines manage unwieldy food? The dog can tackle the joint of meat, big
though it be, because he has limbs to aid him, and he was prepared for
emergencies before he stole it. He knew of a certain deserted yard up
a passage close by, and of some lumber stacked there; he watched his
opportunity, and is off to his hiding-place; and once hidden behind the
lumber, he settles down quietly with his ill-gotten dinner firmly held
between his fore-paws, while, with eyes and ears on the alert, he gnaws
away.</p>

<p>The snake, no doubt, knows of a hole in the bank, or in a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[29]</a></span> hollow
tree, in which he can hide if alarmed; but he cannot set his frog down
for one instant, nor can he relax his jaws in the slightest degree,
or his dinner hops away, and he has to pursue it, or wait for another
frog, when the same thing may happen again. He has only his teeth to
trust to, and these have all the work of paws and claws, and nails
and talons, to accomplish, while yet, not for one instant, must they
relinquish their hold.</p>

<p>‘Besides!&mdash;how much too big that frog is for Coluber’s small mouth!’
And we continue to gaze in wonderment, filled with amazement that
brings us to the bookshelves, to endeavour to comprehend the
phenomenon. Not, however, until we have seen the end of that frog on
the banks of the stream, where the reader is supposed to be waiting.</p>

<p>First, let me explain that in the manner of feeding, snakes may
be divided into three classes, viz. those that kill their prey by
constriction or by smothering it in the coils of their body; those
that kill by poison; and some smaller kinds, which, like the ring
snake, eat it alive&mdash;the latter a quick process, which may also be
said to be death by suffocation. Our little Coluber is in a spot where
we can watch it easily; so we keep rigidly still, and soon perceive
that though the snake just now had hold of froggie’s side, he now has
the head in his mouth. How can this be? and how has he managed to
shift it thus, almost imperceptibly, while seeming to hold it still?
Now the head begins to disappear, and the snake’s jaws stretch in a
most distorted fashion, as if dislocated; its head expands out of all
original shape, while slowly, slowly, the frog is drawn in as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[30]</a></span> if by
suction. Now its legs are passive; they no longer kick right and left,
but lie parallel, as by degrees they also vanish, and only the four
feet remain in sight. These presently have been sucked in, and the
skin of the snake is stretched like a knitted stocking over the lump
which tells us just how far down Coluber’s neck the frog has reached.
Gradually the lump gets farther and farther down, but is less evident
as it reaches the larger part of the body. The snake remains still for
a few moments till his jaws are comfortably in place again; then he
yawns once or twice, and finally retires for his siesta, and we to the
bookshelves.</p>

<p>‘Snakes work their prey down through the collapsed pharynx,’ says
Günther. That is, the muscles of the throat seize upon what is
presented to them, and do their part, as in other animals. Only, in
most other animals there is the <i>action</i> of swallowing, one mouthful
at a time; whereas in serpents the action is continuous, the throat
going on with the work begun by the teeth, which in a snake is
only grasping and working the food in with a motion so gradual as
to simulate suction. The reason why the head and jaws have been so
enormously stretched and distorted, is because all the bones are, in
common language, <i>loose</i>; that is, they are not consolidated like the
head-bones of higher animals, but united by ligaments so elastic as
to enable them to separate in the way we have seen. This extends to
the jaws, and even to the palate, which is also armed with teeth, two
rows extending backwards. The lower jaw or mandible being extremely
long, the elastic ligament by which the pair of bones is connected
in front, forming the chin, enables them to separate widely and move
independently. This is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[31]</a></span> the case in a lesser degree with the palate
bones, and the upper jaw-bones, all six being furnished with long,
fine, recurved, close-set teeth, adapted for <i>grasping</i> and <i>holding</i>,
but not for dividing or for mastication in any way.</p>

<p>For, as we have seen, if a snake were to open its mouth one moment
for the purpose of what we call <i>biting</i>, the prey would escape. In
addition to a very unusual length, the lower jaw is joined to the
skull by an extra bone,&mdash;one which is not found in mammals, but only,
I think, in birds,&mdash;a long ‘tympanic’ bone, which forms an elbow, and
permits of that wide expansion of the throat necessary for the passage
of such large undivided prey.</p>

<p>The illustration of the skeleton of a cobra, on p. 33, will enable
the student to distinguish the principal head-bones. There is so much
similarity of construction throughout the whole ophidian families
that a cobra is chosen here, because the unusually long anterior ribs
which form the hood can be observed, and the expansion of which is
described elsewhere. The longer teeth in the upper jaw are here fangs;
the inclination of the other rows of teeth and the bones sufficiently
illustrate those of the non-venomous kinds generally, such as the
little ring snake that has just swallowed his frog. A few of the larger
constricting snakes possess an additional bone&mdash;an intermaxillary in
front between the upper jaws, very small, yet sometimes furnished with
two or four teeth, thus facilitating the expansion of the jaws as well
as the retention of the food.</p>

<p>It is this adaptive development of head-bones that enabled <i>Coluber
natrix</i> to turn his frog round to a more convenient<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[32]</a></span> position, and then
draw it into his mouth so gradually that we scarcely comprehended how
it disappeared. The six rows of small teeth form six jaws so to speak,
each one of which advanced a very little, while the other five were
engaged in holding firmly. In those largest pythons which have the
little bone in front between the two upper jaw-bones (intermaxillary)
we may say there are <i>seven</i> jaws. As those gigantic snakes have to
deal with proportionately large and strong prey, they are thus enabled
to retain and manage it.</p>

<p>In the graphic language of Professor Owen let me recapitulate.</p>

<p>The mouth can be opened laterally or transversely, as in insects, as
well as vertically, as in other vertebrates. The six jaws are four
above and two below, each of which can be protruded or retracted
independently of the others. ‘The prey having been caught and held,
one jaw is then unfixed by the teeth of that jaw being withdrawn and
pushed forward, when they are again unfixed farther back upon the prey;
another jaw is then unfixed, protruded, and re-attached, and so with
the rest in succession. This movement of protraction, being almost
the only one of which they are susceptible, while stretched apart to
the utmost by the bulk of the animal encompassed by them: and thus by
their successive movements, the prey is slowly introduced into the
gullet.’<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a></p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[33]</a></span></p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-033.jpg" width="350" height="635"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Skeleton of a Cobra (from Owen’s <i>Anatomy of the
Vertebrates</i>).</p>
</div></div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[34]</a></span></p>

<p>This working of the jaws would be almost imperceptible excepting to
a very close observer. In the lower jaw-bones the independent action
can be more readily perceived and is often very grotesque, one side of
the mouth opening while the other is closed, conveying the idea of the
reptile making grimaces at you; but the gradual disappearance of the
prey so much more bulky than the snake itself is quite incomprehensible
until we are acquainted with the remarkable phenomena of the six rows
of teeth acting independently. Thus, in turning the frog round to
adjust it to a more convenient position, the jaws acted like hands in
moving, dragging, or shifting some cumbrous article, say a carpet or
a plank, when the left hand follows the movement of the right hand
until the plank or carpet is worked round or forward in the required
direction.</p>

<p>The form and arrangement of the fine claw-shaped teeth assist the
process. They are too close together, and the pressure is too slight
to inflict a wound; they merely retain what they hold, and it is in
vain for the prey to struggle against them, or it might get some ugly
scratches as they all incline backwards. In chapter xix. illustrations
of teeth, life-size, show their forms and direction; here it only need
be added regarding them, that the above description refers chiefly to
the non-venomous snakes.</p>

<p>The palate being covered with that armoury of teeth, the snake must
have but a slight sense of taste, which is to its advantage, we should
say; for having no assistant in the shape of beak or limbs to divide
its prey, hair, fur, feathers, dust&mdash;all must be swallowed with the
meal, completely disguising whatever flesh they cover, so that we
should suppose the process of feeding could be productive of very
little enjoyment to the reptile. Perhaps out of this state of things
has developed their habit of eating so seldom, but when they<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[35]</a></span> do take
the trouble of feeding, of doing it thoroughly, so that their meal
lasts them a long while.</p>

<p>Deglutition is greatly facilitated by an abundant supply of saliva,
which lubricates that uncomfortable coating of feathers or fur; but
‘lubrication’ is understood to refer merely to the natural secretions
of the mouth, in which the tongue performs no part at all.</p>

<p>The salivary apparatus of snakes is peculiar to them, and very
complicated. Even the nasal and lachrymal glands pour their superfluous
secretions through small canals into the mouth.<a name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> These active and
abundant glands are excited by hunger or the sight of food, just as in
mammals; and for the more common expression of the mouth ‘watering’
that of ‘lubrication’ is here used, because over the rough-coated
prey these salivary secretions act as a great aid in deglutition. The
erroneous impressions that have obtained on this subject are touched
upon in describing the tongue (chap. vi.).</p>

<p>A circumstance happened at the London Zoological Gardens a few years
ago, which, although familiar to many, may be referred to as bearing
on two of the above features&mdash;namely, the dull sense of taste in a
snake, and the abundant supply of mucous secretions. It was in the case
of a large boa which swallowed her blanket. She was about to change
her skin, and, as usual on such occasions, was partially blind, as
also indifferent to food. The rabbits given to her dodged her grasp,
and her appreciation of flavours was not sufficient to enable her to
discriminate between blanket and rabbit fur; so, seizing a portion of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[36]</a></span>
the rug, she with natural instinct constricted this, and proceeded to
swallow it. She was, however, made to disgorge it afterwards, when it
was scarcely recognisable from the thick and abundant coating of mucous
in which it was enveloped. Mr. F. Buckland described its appearance as
that of a ‘long flannel sausage.’</p>

<p>These highly-developed salivary glands are beneficent provisions in
the economy of the serpent race. The reptile cannot, as we said, tear
flesh from bones, and discard the latter; nor separate the food from
the enveloping feathers or fur; nor reject whatever unsavoury portions
other animals might detach and leave uneaten. All must be swallowed by
a snake, and all digested; and its digestion, sufficiently powerful, is
aided by the excessive flow of saliva, or the insalivation of such food.</p>

<p>It is not difficult to make snakes disgorge their food. They often
do so on their own account, when, after swallowing some bulky meal,
they are alarmed or pursued, and escape is less easy with that load to
carry. The illustration exhibiting the numerous ribs, which are all
loosely articulated with the spinal column, enables us to comprehend
the capacity for bulk, and the ease with which these fine ribs would
expand to accommodate a body even broader than the snake itself. We
comprehend, also, why it is that a creature swallowed alive need not
be injured or wounded by the mere fact of being swallowed, but would
die of suffocation after all. A frog has been known to turn round and
escape from the body of the snake, if the latter indulge in a prolonged
yawn; and yawning almost always does follow as soon as the prey is
swallowed, because the snake has<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[37]</a></span> for the time breathed less regularly,
and now requires to take in a fresh supply of air. In this act you see
the two jaws extended to an enormous degree, almost, indeed, to form
one straight line perpendicularly. In such condition the teeth are well
out of the way, and the adjustable ribs, expansile covering, and loose
head bones render them not insurmountable obstacles to an escape when
the prey is uninjured.</p>

<p>One sometimes hears of the egg-stealing snakes, cobras, etc., when
surprised and pursued, first relieving themselves of their plunder
before they attempt to escape. Often it may be observed, when two
snakes are in a cage together, and both get hold of the same frog
or rat, that they each advance upon it till their heads meet, when
either the stronger or the larger snake will gain the day, and
finish his frog, and then proceed to swallow his friend; or else
one will relinquish his hold, when, even in those few minutes, the
half-swallowed prey will be completely disguised in the mucous saliva
which has already enveloped it.</p>

<p>Some snakes, though not quarrelsome at other times, for some reason
inexplicable to the looker-on, persistently set their heart on the same
bird or frog, though many are presented for their choice. In a pair
of <i>Tropidonoti</i> at the Gardens this occurs almost every week; and in
such instances the keeper keeps a sharp watch over them; for as neither
snake will relinquish its capture, the one that begins first comes in
contact with the head of his comrade, who will assuredly be swallowed
too, were not a little moral, or rather physical coercion in the shape
of a good shaking administered. Sometimes both get their ears boxed,
figuratively;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[38]</a></span> yet the discipline has no more than a passing effect,
and next week the same thing happens again.</p>

<p>Not many months ago a very valuable snake was thus rescued literally
from the jaws of death. A South American rat snake (<i>Geoptyas
collaris</i>) began to eat a rabbit that was put in the cage for a python,
which also began to eat it. <i>Collaris</i> would not let it go, and so the
python continued to advance upon it until he came to his comrade, and
proceeded with this prolonged repast. <i>Collaris</i> is a rather large
snake of some eight or ten feet long. When nearly the whole of him had
vanished, the keeper&mdash;who, of course, had been occupied at each cage in
turn&mdash;fortunately discovered about a foot of tail fast disappearing in
the mouth of the python, the whole of <i>Collaris</i>, excepting this caudal
portion, having been swallowed. Just in time to rescue the victim,
the keeper, by his experienced manipulation, made the python open his
mouth, while the assistant helped to pull at <i>Collaris</i>. At last they
pulled back all the seven feet of snake, which sustained no further
injury than a slight scratch or two against the python’s teeth; but he
seemed none the worse, and was no sooner free than he seized a rat,
constricted and ate it with a celerity which seemed to say he would
make sure of a meal this time.</p>

<p>On the following Friday the very same thing was about to occur again.
<i>Collaris</i> had begun to swallow the python’s rabbit, the latter having
prior hold; but the keeper was on the watch, and administered a little
practical reproof which made the rat snake loosen his hold. Matters
were further complicated on this occasion by the python throwing some
coils around his intended feast, so that to get a purchase<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[39]</a></span> and manage
these two constrictors was less easy than on the previous occasion,
though then the snake had been swallowed. In the same cage were also
two other pythons, quite strong enough to strangle a person had
they taken a fancy to hug him round the neck. Both were aroused and
displeased at the commotion, and ready to ‘fly’ at the men, who, on the
whole, had an exciting time with the four constrictors, all from eight
to twelve feet long.</p>

<p>Cannibalism is very common in snakes, particularly among the <i>Elapidæ</i>,
which have small and narrow heads, and can therefore more conveniently
swallow a fellow-creature than a bird or a quadruped. The keeper told
me that often a box arrives at the Gardens labelled ‘Ten cobras,’
or ‘twelve,’ as may be; when, on opening the box, the number falls
short; suggesting that cannibalism has diminished the company. It is
a curious fact, however, that snakes, as a rule, seize prey whose
bulk far exceeds their own, even when a more manageable kind could be
easily caught. It is as if they were aware of the accommodating nature
of their multifold ribs; as a snake longer than themselves must be
doubled up in their stomach, and those broader than themselves must,
one would imagine, be a most uncomfortable meal to dispose of. Yet this
is common. Mr. H. W. Bates found in a jarraraca an amphisbœna larger
than itself, and in another snake a lizard whose bulk exceeded its own.
My Brazilian correspondent, Dr. Arthur Stradling, wrote me of a similar
circumstance. He received a little <i>Elaps lemniscatus</i> in Maceio, which
presented a singularly bloated appearance. It no doubt felt itself
in a condition not favourable to rapid escape; or captivity impaired
its digestion,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[40]</a></span> for ‘the next morning it disgorged an amphisbœna or
small serpent (it was half digested) actually longer than itself, and
weighing half as much again.’</p>

<p>Prodigious meals engender drowsiness, and thus the Ophidia habitually
repose a long while after taking food.</p>

<p>This habit of gorging enormous prey being one of the most striking
of ophidian characteristics, it has been introduced thus early in my
work, as affording opportunity for a general glance at the anatomical
structure. In the next chapter we will enumerate a few other peculiar
features, ere proceeding to examine in detail some of the most
important organs.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-040.jpg" width="200" height="273"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[41]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-041.jpg" width="500" height="101"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER II.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>SNAKES OF FICTION AND OF FACT.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">IN a celebrated lecture on ‘Snakes,’ given by Mr. Ruskin at the London
Institution in March 1880, he introduced his subject with the three
considerations: ‘What has been thought about them?’ ‘What is truly
known about them?’&mdash;extremely little, as he suggested;&mdash;and, ‘What is
wisely asked about them, and what is desirable to know?’</p>

<p>The three questions exactly agree with the object of my work, this
chapter especially; and I will invite my readers to seek in their own
minds the answer to the first question, which will also furnish a
solution to the second, and, I trust, incite some interest in the third.</p>

<p>The learned lecturer carried us through the realms of fancy, to conjure
up all the grotesque creatures which, under the name of ‘serpents,’
have figured in heraldry and mythology. By these, and by the light
of the poets of old, and in later times through the naturalists of
the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, we learn what a ‘serpent’
was to them, and what it included. In remote antiquity it was an
embodiment of the hideous and the terrible; and in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[42]</a></span> spite of Aristotle
(a comparatively recent authority), dragons and such-like chimærical
creatures have pervaded the mind both of the erudite and the ignorant,
in association with serpents, till within three hundred years, and are
not even yet altogether discarded.</p>

<p>Nor am I inclined to believe that the terror-inspiring representations
of classic days are so unreal as might be supposed. Palæontology is
continually bringing to light new evidences of the presence of man
on the earth in ages far remote; and we do not know for certain what
strange forms of animal life were his contemporaries, or when the
faculty of speech was so far developed in him as to enable him to learn
about his predecessors, which were still more terrible. We do know that
fossils of mammoth creatures, passing strange, are coeval with fossil
human remains, and to those early types of humanity a knowledge of
still stranger creatures of reptilian forms may have been handed down
from mouth to mouth; for there is generally a germ of truth at the root
of a myth. Fossil remains tell us of the gigantic forms of ancient
reptiles, or compound reptile-fish or reptile-birds, and quadrupeds
which have gradually diminished in size or become altogether extinct as
our own period has been approached.</p>

<p>Said Professor Huxley, at the British Association in 1878, ‘Within the
last twenty years we have an astonishing accumulation of evidence of
the existence of man in ages antecedent to those of which we have any
historical record. Beyond all question, man, and what is more to the
purpose, intelligent man, existed at a time when the whole physical<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[43]</a></span>
conformation of the country was totally different from that which now
characterizes it.’</p>

<p>Did these intelligent beings know anything of the <i>Dinotherium</i>
(dreadful beast), or the <i>Dinornis</i> (dreadful bird), or any other of
those fearful forms which have furnished historic ages with a dragon?</p>

<p>Coming down to our own era, and the time when travel and education
first induced the observation and study of animals with a view to learn
their habits, and to arrange them under some system of classification,
we begin to see the perplexities that presented themselves to
naturalists, especially with regard to egg-producing creatures. To
Topsell, a writer of the seventeenth century, every creeping or
crawling thing was ‘a Serpente,’ and many insects were included in his
category. To Lawson, on the contrary, every egg-producing creature, if
not a bird, was an ‘Insect.’ In his <i>History of Carolina</i>, 1709, he
describes, under ‘Insects of Carolina,’ all the snakes he saw, also
the alligators, lizards, etc., and thus continues: ‘The Reptiles or
smaller Insects are too numerous to relate here, the Country affording
innumerable quantities thereof; as the Flying Stags with Horns,
Beetles, Butterflies, Grasshoppers, Locusts, and several hundred of
uncouth Shapes.’ Having thus gone through the ‘Insects,’ except the
‘Eel-snake’ (which turns out to be a ‘Loach’ or <i>leech</i>), he gets
puzzled over a ‘Tortois, vulgarly called Turtle, which I have ranked
among the Insects, because they lay Eggs, and I did not know well
where to put them.’ And Lawson was not alone in not knowing ‘where to
put’ a countless number of other creatures that go to form the endless
links in the long chain of living organisms; even<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[44]</a></span> plants, which, to
use Darwin’s words, ‘with animals, though most remote in the scale of
nature, are bound together by a web of complex relations.’ You may
place the dove at one end of the chain and the crocodile at the other,
without one broken link. The earliest bird which palæontology has
revealed had teeth in its bill, claws on the end of its wings, and a
long tail with feathers growing out of it, like a pinnate leaf.</p>

<p>We see those strange forms reproduced in the gardens of the Crystal
Palace. Lizards with the head of a bird and other combinations, the
Pterosauria or winged-lizards, Ichthyosauria or fish-lizards, of which
some representative types still exist in the African <i>Lepidosiren</i>
and the Mexican <i>Axolotl</i>, which have puzzled modern physiologists as
much as the Carolina tortoise puzzled Lawson; for whether to call them
reptiles or fishes was long a disputed question. Dr. Carpenter, in his
<i>Zoology</i>, reckons fifty-eight of such links among reptiles; as, for
instance, the transition from turtles to crocodiles, from tortoises
to lizards, in which latter we find the legs growing shorter, till
they are gone altogether in the blindworms and amphisbænas. These
again branch off to the cecilias, and the cecilias to worms on one
side, and to frogs on the other, having the form of a snake, but the
skin of the batrachian. There are the Ophiosaurians, snake-lizards,
and Saurophidians, lizard-snakes; there are lizard-like frogs and
frog-like lizards; some of them beginning life with gills, and becoming
air-breathers afterwards, others of saurian aspect retaining their
gills through life; and from these, again, is the transition between
reptiles and fishes. There are diminutive snakes of worm-like aspect,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[45]</a></span>
and gigantic worms which might be mistaken for snakes; and among modern
naturalists, that is to say within one hundred years, worms have been
classed with reptiles when none such enormous species as those lately
found in Africa were dreamed of.</p>

<p>There is in no branch of zoology so much confusion as in herpetology;
and if the reader will, with a sweep of the imagination, embrace the
innumerable forms that come under the class <i>Reptilia</i>, their various
coverings, and their close gradations, he will not wonder at this. Let
us glance at a few of the systems adopted by Linnæus and others of his
time, who, we must remember, had to combat not only inherited ideas
of ‘creeping things,’ but the difficulties presented by badly stuffed
or bottled specimens; the latter often having been so long in alcohol
that their colours had flown, or their covering changed in texture. The
Atlantic was not crossed in a week in those days; and three months,
instead of three weeks, barely sufficed to reach India, to say nothing
of inland journeys when you got there. If foreign specimens came home
after the manipulations of a taxidermist, he had done his very best to
render them as hideous as tradition painted them. Sometimes a wooden
head on a stuffed body; teeth that might furnish the jaws of the
largest felines, and a tongue to match; while with external cleansings,
scrapings, and polishings, it were hard to discover what manner of skin
had originally clothed the creature.</p>

<p>Carefully chosen was Aristotle’s name for reptiles, ‘the terrestrial,
oviparous, sanguineous animals;’ for those which we are considering,
breathe by lungs, and are therefore red-blooded.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[46]</a></span> Cuvier divided the
egg-producing animals into oviparous quadrupeds (lizards, turtles,
crocodiles, and frogs); bipeds, the birds; insects and serpents.
Linnæus&mdash;who, by the way, preceded Cuvier&mdash;called all reptiles
‘amphibious animals,’ of which serpents were the second order, those
‘without limbs.’ He also divided them into orders, genera, and species;
but in the Ophidia was guided too much by the scales, which has caused
confusion ever since, as both poisonous and harmless snakes often
present similar characters in this respect.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-046.jpg" width="100" height="238"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>


<p>If the reader will turn to the illustration of scales (p. 193), he will
see an example of the large scutæ or ventral plates that are possessed
by the majority of the true Ophidia. The burrowing snakes, most of
them small and allied to lizards in their structure, are protected by
a cuirass of hard, close-set, polished scales, <i>alike all round</i>; or
else with a thick, smooth skin arranged in rings. Some very poisonous
serpents, notably the sea-snakes, have also the scales alike all round,
because they do not require the hold which those large ventral scales
afford to land serpents in progression; but it will at once be seen
that on so slight a resemblance it would be unsuitable to arrange such
widely-differing families in the same group. The majority of snakes
have the scales under the tail different from those under the body;
and a very large number, both of venomous and innocuous snakes, have
broad ventral scales, as far as the termination of the body, and then a
double row where the tail commences. The accompanying illustration is
sufficient to convey<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[47]</a></span> a general idea of the arrangement of the scales
before and after the anus.</p>

<p>Linnæus called all serpents with these two rows of sub-caudal scales,
<i>Colubers</i>, including under this name many both large and small,
land and water, poisonous and harmless snakes. In respect for the
great talent and vast work accomplished by this eminent naturalist,
as well as his then paramount and diffusive knowledge, his systems
prevailed for a very long while. Cuvier, after Linnæus, became also a
great authority for a time. He recognised distinctions in the fangs
of venomous snakes, and would reform some previous errors regarding
scales. ‘<i>Boa</i> comprenaient autrefois tous les serpens venimeux ou
non, dont le dessous du corps et de la queue est garni de bandes d’une
seul pièce.’<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> It was equally unsuitable to mingle those with the
double rows, as it put a viper and a coluber together. Cuvier also
made closer distinctions between the lizard-like snakes and the true
Ophidia, ‘<i>serpens proprement dit</i>.’ The words <i>herpetology</i> (from the
Greek), and <i>serpents</i> (from the Latin <i>serpo</i>), formerly embraced a
much larger variety; the former may include <i>all</i> reptiles, while the
more recently adopted one of <i>ophiology</i> comprises snakes only. And the
history of the word tells of the history of the distinctions gradually
adopted as above described, as the true snakes or serpents, without
external limbs, were separated from the rest.</p>

<p>The various names for a snake&mdash;Anguis, Serpens, Coluber, etc.&mdash;having
been made generic distinctions by some of the older naturalists, cause
considerable puzzle to the student,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[48]</a></span> who finds these words applied
alike to many varying species in as many books, because a writer has
often taken one author for his guide, instead of comparing a number.
Many modern writers on ophiology give us a list of synonymes, which
in time are found to unravel the above perplexities, but which are at
first more puzzling than not, because a single snake is presented to
you under so many different names. This will be apparent in the course
of this work, wherein much that is merely suggestive in the present
chapter will be treated more fully under various headings, without, I
trust, offering a too wearisome repetition. Indeed, the whole study of
the Ophidia presents so many exceptions that recapitulations may be
acceptable rather than otherwise. An interlacing of subjects has not
here been avoided so much as contrived, in the hope of presenting the
whole more clearly to the mind of the student.</p>

<p>Ruskin favoured his audience with printed lists of the ‘names of the
snake tribe in the great languages.’ And these I gladly reproduce for
the benefit of my readers.</p>


<p class="pc1"><span class="smcap">‘Names of the Snake Tribe in the Great Languages.’</span></p>

<p class="p1">1. Ophis (Greek), ‘the seeing’ (creature, understood). Meaning
especially one that sees all round it.</p>

<p>2. Dracon (Greek), Drachen (German), ‘the beholding.’ Meaning one that
looks well into a thing, or person.</p>

<p>3. Anguis (Latin), ‘the strangling.’</p>

<p>4. Serpens (Latin), ‘the winding.’</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[49]</a></span></p>

<p>5. Coluber (Latin), Couleuvre (French), ‘the coiling.’</p>

<p>6. Adder (Saxon), ‘the grovelling.’</p>

<p>7. Snake (Saxon), Schlange (German), ‘the crawling’ (with sense of
dragging, and of smoothness).</p>

<p class="p1">The first, and <i>Ophidion</i>, a small serpent, <i>Ophiodes</i>, etc., have
given the name <i>Ophiology</i> to the science; the second was also a
‘serpente’ in days of yore. The third, <i>Anguis</i>, is now applied to some
of the smooth, burrowing snakes; and the rest speak for themselves.</p>

<p>Before quite taking leave of obsolete teachings, a few lines from
two very distinguished authors of the seventeenth century must be
quoted, the influence of both having no doubt gone a great way towards
diffusing beliefs. Lord Bacon&mdash;in his book, <i>Of the Proficience and
Aduancement of Learning, Diuine and Humane</i>. To the King. 1605&mdash;writes,
‘It is not possible to join Serpentine Wisdom with the Columbine
Innocency, except men know exactly all the conditions of the Serpent;
his Baseness and going upon his Belly, his Volubility and Lubricity,
his Envy and Sting; for without this, Virtue lyeth unfenced.’</p>

<p>What quality is to be understood by ‘Volubility,’ the reader must
decide. Of the other five offences, all except that of crawling are
simply imaginary. By ‘Lubricity,’ a supposed sliminess may be intended,
or the old fable of ‘licking’ the prey; and the only reasonable
interpretation of the ‘Sting’ is that the old Saxon word <i>styng</i> did
imply a wound punctured or pierced with any fine, sharp instrument; and
the venomous tooth is not so very unlike an insect’s sting after all.</p>

<p>The next is from <i>Pepys’ Diary</i>, vol. i. p. 322.&mdash;Feb. 4th,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[50]</a></span>
1661:&mdash;‘Mr. Templer, an ingenious Man, discoursing of the Nature of
Serpents, told us that some in the waste Places of Lincolnshire do grow
to a Great Bigness, and do feed upon Larkes which they take thus:&mdash;They
observe when the Larke is soared to the Highest, and do crawl till they
come to be just underneath them, and there they place themselves with
their mouth uppermost; and there, as it is conceived, they do eject
Poyson upon the Bird; for the Bird do suddenly come down again in its
course of a Circle, and falls directly into the Mouth of the Snake.’</p>

<p>This story, founded on fact, is related by a beholder who, to use the
words of Dr. Andrew Wilson when discoursing on ‘Zoological Myths,’ made
‘an unscientific use of his imagination.’ Our largest English snake has
no poison to ‘eject, as it was conceived.’ Quite possible that it might
have looked up towards the singing lark, and with the swiftness of the
bird in its descent, glided towards the spot, ready to pounce upon it.
The absurdity of poison being ejected upwards through a needle-like
fang,&mdash;had the snake possessed such an instrument,&mdash;and to such a
height, is evident.</p>

<p>Having reduced a very large circle of anomalous reptiles, till the
Ophidia only are in possession of the enclosure, let me endeavour
to dispose of these according to the present accepted methods&mdash;not
of classification, or this volume would be mere lists of names. In
1858, when Dr. Günther arranged and classified the collection in
the British Museum, there were 3100 colubrine snakes (those with no
viperine features); and when you think of these three thousand odd
having, on an average, a dozen<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[51]</a></span> names each (the reason for which is
deferred till the later chapters), my readers will cheerfully dispense
with much in the way of classes and orders, especially as the present
methods are reckoned very defective, and there is a loud cry for a new
classification of the <i>Reptilia</i>. Already the reader can surmise some
of the difficulties, and they will be more evident as we proceed.</p>

<p>The whole order of Ophidia may be divided into the venomous and the
non-venomous, or into other two divisions, viz. those which approach
the Saurians, having scales alike all round, vestiges of shoulder bones
and hind limbs, and with ribs nearly encircling the body; and those
which have the broad ventral plates, no rudimentary limbs, and a tongue
far more extensible than the previous group.</p>

<p>It will not, I trust, be out of place to introduce a table as presented
to us at some of the ‘Davis Lectures’ at the London Zoological Gardens;
for I think I am safe in saying this arrangement is adopted by nearly
all our living authorities. To go back to the days of our childhood
and the game of ‘Animal, Vegetable, or Mineral?’&mdash;the original three
kingdoms of Nature,&mdash;the first heads our table: ANIMAL KINGDOM. Next
comes the sub-kingdom, comprising five divisions, namely mammals,
birds, reptiles, frogs, and fishes, each of which is divided into
class, order, family, genus, species, with sometimes a sub-class or
a sub-order. Professor St. George Mivart divides the whole of the
reptiles into&mdash;(1) <i>Chelonia</i>, the tortoises; (2) <i>Ophidia</i>, the
snakes; (3) <i>Crocodilia</i>, or <i>Loricata</i>, the crocodiles; (4) <i>Sauria</i>,
the lizards. <i>Batrachia</i>,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[52]</a></span> the frogs, he separates, because they begin
life as a fish. Originally there were nine orders of reptiles; then
for a long while we were taught that there were four,&mdash;Chelonians,
Ophidians, Saurians, and Batrachians. Every one of the above so merges
into the others that many herpetologists differ in drawing the lines
between them.</p>

<p>If we were asked to define our little friend, the ring snake, that ate
a frog while we were studying his anatomy, we would say that he belongs
to the&mdash;</p>

<p class="pi10 p1">1. <span class="smcap">Animal Kingdom.</span><br />
2. <span class="smcap">Sub-Kingdom</span>, <i>Vertebrata</i>.<br />
3. <span class="smcap">Class</span>, <i>Reptilia</i>.<br />
4. <span class="smcap">Order</span>, <i>Ophidia</i>.<br />
5. <span class="smcap">Family</span>, <i>Tropidonotus</i>.<br />
6. <span class="smcap">Genus</span>, <i>Coluber</i>.<br />
7. <span class="smcap">Species</span>, <i>Natrix</i>.</p>

<p class="p1">He is most frequently known as <i>Coluber natrix</i>, though as both words
mean simply a snake, the name is inadequate. In fact, our common
English snake has been rather neglected in the way of titles, the
only generic name which is at all descriptive being <i>Tropidonotus</i>,
so called from the keel which characterizes the scales. So he is
<i>Tropidonotus natrix</i>, and <i>Natrix tropidonotus</i>, and <i>Natrix torquata</i>
of the different authors, the last-named specific presumably given on
account of the collar which he wears, and which being often yellow,
has gained for him the name of ‘ring snake.’ <i>Coluber natrix</i>, having
so few synonymes, they are all given, in illustration of what has
been already said of the perplexity of names assigned by different
naturalists. And,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[53]</a></span> by the way, this ‘ring’ or ‘collar’ is not an
invariable mark. Sometimes the yellow is wanting altogether, and only
a white collar is displayed. At the time of writing<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> there is one
of these snakes at the Zoological Gardens with not the least tint of
yellow on its neck; and I have before me in alcohol a very young and
beautiful little specimen in which the white collar is very bright
and large, and set off with deep black behind it, but there is not an
approach to yellow or to a ring, the throat being pure white. His Latin
specific is therefore more appropriate than his English one, the collar
being always there, but not always the ring.</p>

<p>Dr. Günther divides the whole of the Ophidia into five groups, and in
briefly describing these I shall hope to conduct my readers towards
a consideration of those remarkable features which will be discussed
under their various heads, and which will exhibit the class as unique
in their marvellous organization and physical powers.</p>

<p>The five groups are&mdash;</p>

<p class="pi10 p1"><span class="smcap">1. Burrowing Snakes.<br />
2. Ground Snakes.<br />
3. Tree Snakes.<br />
4. Fresh-water Snakes.<br />
5. Sea Snakes.</span></p>

<p class="p1">(1) The <i>Burrowing Snakes</i> live chiefly underground, some of them
working their way down like the worms; and to fit them for this life
they are characterized by having short stiff bodies covered with hard,
firm, close scales, to form an<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[54]</a></span> armour. Most of them have short and
rather curious tails, as described in chap. xi.; but many that burrow
and hide in the ground live a good deal on the surface as well. Our
little native slow-worm (<i>Anguis fragilis</i>) is allied to these. Their
heads are small and narrow, their muzzle smooth and strong to help them
to work their way. Their jaws do not stretch apart, nor does their head
get out of shape in eating, the bones being all more consolidated;
and their food being chiefly insects, slugs, worms, etc., they seize
upon these, and hold them, and then with quick snaps get them down
their throats. Many of them have rudiments of a sternum, and pelvic
bones&mdash;<i>vestiges</i>, perhaps, is a more correct term, as we shall find
by and by, for their saurian ancestors had perfect limbs. The group is
large, perfectly harmless, and has representatives in most countries
where a snake or a lizard is to be found. None are of great size.</p>

<p>(2) The <i>Ground Snakes</i> include by far the greatest number and
diversity, and though passing their time chiefly on the surface like
our ‘ring-snake,’ can both climb trees and enjoy the water. Some of the
most venomous as well as the harmless and gentle kinds, and some of the
largest as well as the smallest, live habitually on the ground. To fit
them for progression, they have the broad ventral scales described on
p. 46, wide dilatable jaws like <i>Coluber natrix</i>, and scales of various
patterns and colourings. Vipers, the cobras, the coronellas, the boas,
moccasins, ‘carpet snakes,’ and other familiar names belong to this
large group.</p>

<p>(3) <i>Tree Snakes</i> include both venomous and innocent genera. They are
none of them large, many of them of a brilliant green, and some of them
exquisitely beautiful.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[55]</a></span> Slender and active, the harmless kinds skim
among the branches, which scarcely bend beneath their weight. Many of
them have small and peculiarly arranged ventral shields, not requiring
to hold on in progression; many also have long prehensile tails, which
wind and cling while the little acrobats swing to and fro, or hang down
to take a young bird or an egg out of the nest. The poisonous kinds
of tree snakes abound in India, have a thick body, broad head, and a
dull, sluggish habit, but still are handsome as to colour, and mostly
green. They hide in the trunks of trees, or in the hollow forks of the
branches, and rarely venture upon the ground. Some, however, live only
in bushy foliage lower down, while other arboreal species frequent the
highest branches, where, moving with amazing celerity, they are as much
at home as the feathered inhabitants.</p>

<p>(4) <i>Fresh-Water Snakes</i> are especially adapted for an aquatic
existence, and have their nostrils on the top of the snout, to enable
them to breathe easily when in the water. Some of them can hold on
to weeds or other things by their tails. They swim and dive, and are
as active as eels. None are very large, and all are harmless. But a
good many of the second group that are poisonous, spend so much of
their time in the water that they are known as ‘water vipers,’ ‘water
moccasins,’ etc., though not truly water snakes.</p>

<p>(5) <i>Sea Snakes.</i>&mdash;All highly venomous. These, as also the fresh-water
snakes, are treated fully in chapters xiii. and xiv. The five divisions
assist the student towards grasping an idea of the principal groups,
but the whole five pass into each other by intermediate forms and
imperceptible degrees.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[56]</a></span></p>

<p>Some other general characteristics of the Ophidia are that all
are carnivorous, catching their prey alive; all are oviparous;
and in organization and intelligence they rank between birds and
fishes,&mdash;higher than fishes in having lungs, and lower than birds,
which are warm-blooded animals. Their heart is so formed as to send
only a portion of blood to the lungs on each contraction of it;
their temperature, therefore, is that of the surrounding atmosphere
(see p. 142). Their normal condition, particularly that of the
venomous species, is one of lethargic repose and indolence, with a
disposition to retreat and hide, rather than to obtrude themselves.
On this account, and also because so many of them are nocturnal in
their habits, less has been truly known of serpents than of most
other creatures, prejudice having added to a prevailing indifference
regarding them. The duration of their lives is uncertain, or whether
they have a stated period of growth. Some naturalists think they grow
all their lives; but this must not be taken literally, or that if a
small snake happened to escape dangers, and live a very long while, it
would acquire the dimensions of a python. Some think that formerly the
constrictors did attain more formidable proportions than those of the
present day.</p>

<p>Snakes have small brains, slight intelligence, and slow sensations,
amounting almost to insensibility to pain. They can live a long while
without their brains and without their heart; while the latter, if
taken from the body, will continue its pulsations for a considerable
time. Also if the head be severed, the body will for a certain time
continue to move, coil, and even spring, and the head will try to bite,
and the tongue dart out as in life.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[57]</a></span></p>

<p>Persons who dislike snakes continually ask, ‘What is the use of them?’
That they are not without a use will, I hope, appear in the course of
this work, were it necessary to preach that <i>all</i> things have their
use. But in one habit that offended Lord Bacon, viz. of ‘going on
their belly,’ lies one of their greatest uses, because that, together
with their internal conformation and external covering, enables them
to penetrate where no larger carnivorous animal could venture, into
dense and noisome morasses, bogs, jungles, swamps, amid the tangled
vegetation of the tropics, where swarms of the lesser reptiles, on
which so many of them feed, would otherwise outbalance the harmony
of nature, die, and produce pestilences. Wondrously and exquisitely
constructed for their habitat, they are able to exist where the higher
animals could not; and while they help to clear those inaccessible
places of the lesser vermin, they themselves supply food for a number
of the smaller mammalia, which, with many carnivorous birds, devour
vast numbers of young snakes. The hedgehog, weasel, ichneumon, rat,
peccary, badger, hog, goat, and an immense number of birds keep snakes
within due limits, while the latter perform their part among the
grain-devouring and herbivorous lesser creatures. Thus beautifully is
the balance of nature maintained.</p>

<p>Dr. Kirtland, an eminent naturalist of Ohio, who lived at a time when
that State was being very rapidly settled, namely, during the early
and middle part of the present century, observed a great increase of
certain snakes as game birds which fed on them decreased. The latter
were, of course, in request for the market, and the snakes, the ‘black<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[58]</a></span>
snake’ particularly, having fewer enemies to consume him, flourished
accordingly. It would be worth while to ascertain whether the farmer
in Ohio had reason to rejoice over this redundancy of rat and vermin
consumers. At the present time, when so much of the land is under
cultivation, snakes have decreased again through human agency.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-058.jpg" width="250" height="92"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[59]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-059.jpg" width="500" height="110"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER III.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>OPHIDIAN TASTE FOR BIRDS’ EGGS.</i></p>


<p class="drop-cap06">CAN we correctly say that snakes have a ‘taste’ for eggs? What flavour
can there be in an egg-shell, and what pleasure or gratification can
a snake derive from swallowing a hard, round, tasteless, apparently
odourless, and inconvenient mass like a large egg?</p>

<p>That snakes do devour eggs and swallow them whole, though the
fact is often questioned in zoological journals, is well known in
countries where snakes abound. Therefore, we are led to consider by
what extraordinary insight or perception a snake discovers that this
uncompromising solid contains suitable food? Avoiding, as snakes do as
a rule, all dead or even motionless food, it is the more surprising
that eggs should prove an exception. And not merely the small and
soft-shelled eggs of little birds, that can be got easily into the
mouth and swallowed, but the eggs of poultry and the larger birds,
which must in the first place be difficult to grasp, and in the second
place to which the jaws so wonderfully adjust themselves that the egg
passes down entire into the stomach.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[60]</a></span></p>

<p>Many snakes which do not habitually live in trees, will climb them
in search of birds’ eggs; and many others, not so agile in climbing,
consume vast numbers of eggs from the nests of birds which build upon
the ground. In countries where snakes are numerous and population
sparse, their depredations in the poultry-yards of secluded residences
are of common occurrence. And it is a noteworthy fact that the crawling
culprits possess an excellent memory for the localities of hens’ nests,
so that when once the eggs have been missing, and the snake’s tracks
discovered, the farm-hands well know that the offence will be repeated,
and watch for the thief, to whom no mercy is shown. But between their
virtues as mousers and their vices as egg-thieves, an American farmer
does sometimes hesitate in destroying certain non-venomous snakes, and
may occasionally feel disposed to save his crops, to the sacrifice of
his wife’s poultry-yard.</p>

<p>A gentleman, long a resident in India, informed me that a cobra once
got through a chink into his hen-house, and ate so many eggs from under
a sitting hen, that it could not effect its exit through the same
chink, and so remained half in and half out, where the next morning it
was discovered in a very surfeited condition. It was immediately killed
and cut open, when, as the eggs were found to be unbroken and still
warm, the experiment was tried of replacing them under the mother,
who in due time hatched the brood none the worse for this singular
‘departure’ in their process of incubation.</p>

<p>In another poultry-yard a cobra was found coiled in a hen’s nest, from
which all the eggs were gone but two. In<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[61]</a></span> this case, also, the snake
had swallowed more than it could conveniently manage, but either alarm,
capture, or greediness so impaired its digestion that all the eggs were
ejected entire!</p>

<p>A similar incident was recorded in the <i>Field</i> newspaper, in May 1867,
the editor introducing the narrator as one of undoubted intelligence
and veracity.</p>

<p>His gardener informed him that a cobra had attacked a guinea-fowl’s
nest in the compound. He took his gun and repaired immediately to
the spot, where he saw the cobra making off, followed by a host of
screaming fowls. The gentleman shot the culprit through the head, and
then observed a tumour-like swelling, as of an egg recently swallowed.
The gardener cut the reptile open, and took out the egg safe and sound.
The gentleman marked the egg, and set it with fourteen others under a
guinea-fowl. In due time the young chick was hatched; and this he also
marked, in order to observe whether it would grow up a healthy bird,
which it did.</p>

<p>Several other well-authenticated instances of this nature might be
related; but those who have friends or relatives in India are no doubt
sufficiently familiar with such stories to dispense with them here.</p>

<p>Aware of a cobra’s penchant for eggs, the snake-catchers, or those who
pack them for transportation to Europe, sometimes place a supply in the
cages, as convenient food for the snakes during the voyage. The keeper
of the Ophidarium<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> at the London Zoological Gardens frequently<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[62]</a></span> finds
hens’ eggs unbroken on opening a case containing the newly-arrived
cobras. How many eggs were originally in the box, and how many had
been eaten and digested, or reproduced during the voyage, it would be
interesting to ascertain if possible.</p>

<p>Snakes are fastidious feeders and long fasters during confinement.
Those cobras may have fasted during the whole journey, or they may have
swallowed and disgorged the eggs through terror, like their friends
at home. Two things are clear, viz. that the eggs were deposited in
the cage as a favourite delicacy, and that a hen’s egg is not a too
cumbrous morsel for even the small-headed cobra to manage.</p>

<p>A gentleman, accustomed to snakes, on hearing of this, regarded the
eggs found intact in the box as a proof against their egg-eating
propensities, and pointed to the Ophiophagus which, for lack of his
ordinary food one winter, had in vain been tempted with both pigeons’
and hens’ eggs. ‘He won’t eat them, he won’t notice them,’ was the
keeper’s testimony; but, then, other snakes often decline food, even
their habitual and favourite food, when in confinement; and so far as
the Indian snakes are concerned, their egg-eating habits are confirmed
by many writers, including Sir Joseph Fayrer, who affirms that ‘they
will eat and swallow the eggs whole.’ ‘Snakes are all carnivorous,
existing on animals and birds’ eggs,’ he again remarks.<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> ‘Cobras rob
hen-roosts, and swallow the eggs whole.’<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a></p>

<p>And does not the very fact of the eggs being placed in the cages by the
natives for their food during a journey,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[63]</a></span> show that these latter knew
what would be most likely to tempt them?</p>

<p>The Indian vernacular of the Ophiophagus is <i>Sunkerchor</i>, which means,
as Fayrer tells us, ‘a breaker of shells.’ I have taken some pains to
ascertain a more definite reason for this name being assigned to the
Ophiophagus, or snake-eater, but without success. Is it because he is
an <i>exception</i> to the rule of eggs being swallowed <i>whole</i>, he having
for his size a particularly small mouth and swallow; and that he, like
his relatives the cobras, being unwilling to relinquish the dainty,
manages them clumsily, and breaks the shells? There must be some reason
for his being known as the ‘shell-breaker.’</p>

<p>Being a tree snake, it may be that ‘Sunkerchor,’ the shell-breaker,
attempts the smaller birds’ eggs, which are too tender to be swallowed
without fracture.</p>

<p>The cobra-worshipping Hindûs on their festivals place eggs for their
gods, that they also may partake of the feast.</p>

<p>But examples of egg-eating snakes are not confined to India. America,
the Cape colonies, and all snake countries are prolific of them.</p>

<p>Mr. P. H. Gosse in Jamaica killed a yellow boa (<i>Chilobothrus
inornatus</i>), inside of which he found seven unbroken hen’s eggs. It had
been caught in a rat trap.</p>

<p>Catesby, the early American naturalist, in describing the corn-coloured
snake, says ‘it is harmless except as a robber of hens’ roosts.’
Lawson, the still earlier traveller, in his quaint description of the
‘Racer,’ or ‘black snake’ (<i>Coluber constrictor</i>), says:&mdash;‘He is an
excellent Egg Merchant, for he does not suck the Eggs, but swallows
them whole. He will<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[64]</a></span> often swallow all the Eggs from under a Hen that
sits, and coil himself under the Hen in the nest, where sometimes the
Housewife finds him.’ Lawson, also, describes the ‘Egg and Chicken
Snake’ (a doubtful vernacular), ‘so called because it is frequent about
the Hen-Yard, and eats Eggs and Chickens.’ The early American settlers
guarded their poultry-yards against snakes as vigilantly as against
rats, foxes, and other such predators. As for the ‘black snake,’ though
non-venomous, all rearers of poultry visit him with vengeance.</p>

<p>Often in our rambles through the woods in Virginia we saw these snakes,
and the swiftness with which they would vanish through the grass like
a flash of steel, proved how well they merited their name of ‘Racer.’
These are the ‘black snakes’ <i>par excellence</i>, in distinction to the
black water-viper and several other kinds which have more or less black
about them. Sometimes they lay basking in our path, probably after a
meal, when they become sleepy and inactive. On one such occasion I had
an excellent opportunity of examining one of them, and of measuring
it. It was exactly six feet long, and in the largest part as thick as
a man’s arm. Its scales were beautifully bright, like an armour of
steel, the white throat and pale under tints completing the resemblance
of polished metal. It was sleeping on a soft carpet of moss and grass
which bordered our sandy path, and which showed the Racer to great
advantage. My young companion, a Virginian boy to whom no sport came
amiss, espied it with delight, and ran to pick up a stout stick.
Knowing that it was harmless, and so excellent a mouser, I pleaded for
its life; for in truth the nocturnal visitors in the shape of rats
at our country dwelling were so noisy<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[65]</a></span> and numerous, that I regarded
the Racer as a friend rather to be encouraged and domesticated than
ruthlessly slain. Its couch now, in its spring green and freshness,
was enamelled with the star-like partridge-berry (<i>Mitchella repens</i>),
dotted here and there with twin coral berries that had lingered through
the winter; the bright-leaved, white-flowered winter green (<i>Chimaphila
maculata</i>); the Bluets (<i>Oldenlandia purpurea</i>), and other exquisite
little flowers too lovely to be crushed and tainted; while a sunbeam
glancing through the trees, and showing up the polished scales of the
unconscious Racer, all seemed eloquent with mercy.</p>

<p>It was the first time I had been close enough to touch so large a
snake; and the whole scene is vividly before me now. Culprit though it
might be, it was splendid and beautiful; and I entreated Johnny to wait
and wake it up, so that we might watch its actions.</p>

<p>‘All very fine!’ cried the boy, not yet in his teens, ‘and fourteen
more eggs gone from the hen-house last night!’</p>

<p>So he pounced upon a fallen bough, which he rapidly trimmed to suit
his purpose, then with one sharp blow across the poor thing’s back,
disabled it. I think the snake was quite killed by the blows the boy
subsequently dealt, for I do not remember that it moved at all.</p>

<p>‘<i>Now</i> you can look at it as much as you please,’ said the juvenile
sportsman as he straightened the reptile out to its full length. Then I
examined and measured it, and found it was more than two lengths of my
long-handled parasol. Black creatures with two hands and two legs were
far more likely to be the egg-stealers than that poor Racer far off in
the woods.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[66]</a></span></p>

<p>This ‘black snake’ climbs trees with ease, and hangs from a branch to
reach a nest below him. ‘He is the nimblest creature living,’ says an
old writer on Virginia, for he not only has the credit of stealing
hens’ eggs, but he ‘even swallows the eggs of small birds, without
breaking them,’ which again is a proof of the remarkable control these
creatures possess of regulating the pressure of their powerful jaws.</p>

<p>Many of the African snakes climb trees, and also suspend themselves
from a branch while reaching into a bird’s nest lower down for the
eggs it may contain. Both Livingstone and Dr. Andrew Smith<a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> make
particular mention of some of the egg-eating snakes of South Africa,
the latter in his general description of ophidians stating that ‘many,
perhaps all snakes, devour eggs when they have an opportunity. A few
feed entirely on eggs,’ notably some of the small tree snakes, to which
the name <i>Oligodon</i> (few teeth) has been given, this family having no
teeth on the palate, like all other snakes. Their food, therefore,
cannot be of a nature to require a very strong grasp, though we have no
authority for stating that the <i>Oligodons</i> feed exclusively on eggs.</p>

<p>There is, however, one of the family with a dentition so remarkable
that it has been considered a distinct type, and Dr. Andrew Smith,
who was the first to observe its habits, gave it the generic name
of <i>Anodon</i> (toothless), the jaws being merely roughened with the
rudiments of teeth. This little snake, of about two feet in length, is
exclusively an egg-feeder. ‘Its business,’ says Professor Owen in his
<i>Odontography</i>, ‘is to restrain the undue increase of small<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[67]</a></span> birds by
devouring their eggs.’ Its remarkable organization is favourable for
the passage of these thin-shelled eggs unbroken until far back in the
throat or gullet, when the egg comes in contact with certain ‘gular
teeth,’ which then break the shell without any loss of the contents to
the feeder. These gular teeth are a curious modification of some of
the spinal processes, presenting a singular anomaly in the presence of
points of enamel on the extremity of some of them.</p>

<p>Professor Owen has very fully described this remarkable
development,<a name="FNanchor_11_11" id="FNanchor_11_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> and as his works have been the text-books of many
later physiologists, his words may here be quoted, even at the risk of
repetition.</p>

<p>‘In the rough tree snake, <i>Deirodon scaber</i>, with 256 vertebræ,
a hypapophysis&mdash;from ὑπὸ (Latin, <i>sub</i>), an offshoot from
beneath&mdash;projects from the 32 anterior ones, which are directed
backwards in the first ten, and incline forwards in the last ten,
where they are unusually long, and tipped with a layer of hard cement
(dentine). These perforate the dorsal parietes of the œsophagus, and
serve as teeth.</p>

<p>‘Those who are acquainted with the habits and food of this species
have shown how admirably this apparent defect&mdash;viz. the lack of
teeth&mdash;is adapted to its well-being. Now, if the teeth had existed
of the ordinary form and proportions in the maxillary and palatal
regions, the egg must have been broken as soon as it was seized, and
much of the nutritious contents would have escaped from the lipless
mouth; but owing to the almost edentulous state of the jaws, the
egg glides along the expanded mouth unbroken,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[68]</a></span> and not until it has
reached the gullet, and the closed mouth prevents the escape of any
of the nutritious matter, is it exposed to the instruments adapted to
its perforation. These instruments consist of the inferior spinous
processes,’ etc., already described. ‘They may be readily seen even in
very small subjects, in the interior of that tube in which their points
are directed backwards. The shell being sawed open longitudinally by
these vertebral teeth, the egg is crushed by the contractions of the
gullet, and is carried to the stomach, where the shell is no doubt soon
dissolved by the acid gastric juice.’</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-068.jpg" width="500" height="241"
         alt=""
         title="" />
<table id="tc3" summary="tc3">
 <tr>
  <td class="tdl1">Portion of spine of the Deirodon, from Andrew Smith’s
<i>Zoology of South Africa</i>.</td>
  <td class="tdl1">Gular teeth penetrating into the gullet, <i>ib.</i></td>
  <td class="tdl1">Portion of spine from a skeleton at the museum of the R.
C. S., natural size.</td>
 </tr>
</table>
</div>

<p>The two from Smith’s <i>Zoology</i> must be much magnified; the third, from
the skeleton, being the true size, excepting that the ribs are broken
short off, some entirely so. The minute processes extend two or more
inches.</p>

<p>As the learned professor has described the <i>Deirodon</i> (neck-toothed)
both under the head of teeth, and also of vertebrated animals, the two
accounts are blended, but given <i>verbatim</i> as far as possible.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[69]</a></span></p>

<p>The colour of the <i>Deirodon</i> is of a brightish or yellowish brown, very
minutely spotted with white. Such few true teeth as some individuals
may possess are extremely small and conical, discovered only towards
the angle of the mouth.</p>

<p>Dr. Andrew Smith first examined a specimen in 1829, when he found that
the gular teeth commence exactly 2-1/4 inches behind the apex of the
lower jaw, and penetrate the œsophagal canal through small holes in its
tunics, and that each point is armed with enamel. He had observed that
the living specimens which he had in captivity always, when feeding,
retained the egg stationary about two inches from their head, and while
there, used great efforts to crush it. Dissecting a specimen in order
to investigate this strange action, he discovered the gular teeth just
where the egg had stopped, and which, he felt satisfied, had assisted
in fixing it there, and also in breaking the shell when subjected to
the muscular action of the surrounding parts. The gular teeth are
developed in very young <i>Deirodons</i>.</p>

<p>Dr. Smith saw that the broken shell was ejected, while the fluid
contents were conveyed onwards; but this may have been an exceptional
case, because by a snake in health egg-shells are easily digested.
Probably those snakes watched by Dr. A. Smith being captives, and
presumably not altogether as happy and healthy as in their sylvan
homes, found the shells too much for them, and so ejected them; as
the cobras above described disgorged the stolen eggs. This habit of
disgorging food appears to be sometimes voluntary.</p>

<p>Snakes have been known to pass the egg through their body entire, but
this also must be owing to an abnormal<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[70]</a></span> state of health or of habit, as
the strong juices of the stomach, which can convert even bones and horn
to nutriment, ordinarily dissolve an egg-shell.</p>

<p>Throughout nature we find that, whatever the habits of the creature may
be, its structure and capacities are adapted to it. Every need is, as
it were, anticipated in the process of development; and wherever, as
in this harmless little tree snake, we find a departure from general
rules, it is because some especial requirements are met, and in order
that the creature may be the better prepared for the struggle for
existence. In the present example we find a marvellous adaptation of
spine bones to dental purposes; how many ages it has taken to develop
them we cannot conjecture. All we know is that these spinal projections
are just the sort of teeth that the egg-swallower requires, and that
its natural teeth are gradually becoming obsolete from disuse.</p>

<p>A writer who was quoted at some length in the <i>Zoologist</i> for 1875, and
in several other contemporary journals, stated that some snakes ‘suck
out the contents of hen’s eggs by making a hole at the end.’<a name="FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a></p>

<p>We are not told with what instrument these evidently scientific
serpents punctured the shell. Some skill is required, as schoolboys
give us to understand, to prick an egg-shell without breaking it; and
even when the hole <i>is</i> bored, additional care is required to suck out
the contents. How a snake could first grasp firmly, and then puncture a
fowl’s egg, is incomprehensible; how the sucking process is achieved<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[71]</a></span>
is still more so. We can understand that a snake which discovered a
broken egg might seem to lap some of the contents, because, as we shall
by and by show, the tongue habitually investigates, and is immediately
in requisition under all circumstances. But to lap up an egg would be a
very slow process for so slender an instrument. One is reminded of the
dinner which Sir Reynard invited his friend the Stork to partake with
him.</p>

<p>While still marvelling over these South African egg-suckers, I
watched some lizards with a broken egg in their cage. Their tongues
were long, thin, blade-like, and bifid, much better adapted for
the purpose of lapping than that of a snake, yet stupidly slow and
inefficient was this ribbon-like tongue. The lizards threw it out,
spatula-fashion, into the midst of the pool of egg which was spreading
itself over the floor, and caught whatever of the fluid adhered to it.
Had the lizards possessed lips adapted for such a purpose, and, in
addition, intelligence enough to ‘suck,’ they might have drawn some
of the cohesive mass into their throats, but they only obeyed their
instinctive habit of lapping. Snakes would do the same. Their habit
is to moisten the tongue in lapping; and I fear we must not place too
much credence in the exceptional intelligence of that South African
egg-sucker, but rather regret the loose account which conveys so
erroneous an impression. I watched those lizards for many minutes, and
decided that the egg would be dried up long before it could be consumed
by lizard-lapping.</p>

<p>The tongue of a snake is undoubtedly an important and highly-developed
organ. That its sensitiveness assists the smell, we have reason to
believe, and possibly it possesses<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[72]</a></span> other faculties of which we are at
present ignorant. In the case of an unbroken egg, for instance, the
tongue has told the snake that there is something good inside it; and
instinct immediately leads the reptile to get the awkward mouthful
between its jaws, which expand just so far as to retain it safely,
yet just so lightly that not one of those rows of long, sharp teeth
shall penetrate the shell or fracture it in the slightest degree. How
delicate must be the adjustment whereby those six jaws, all bristling
with fine, needle-like teeth, grasp and yet not break the delicate
shell! for, after all, an egg <i>is</i> a fragile substance in proportion to
the size of the feeder and its muscular power.</p>

<p>Snakes have been known to get choked in attempting to swallow an egg,
as they have also come to grief with other impediments, such as horns
of cattle; but this we must attribute to their not being able to
estimate their own swallowing capacities, or to some other untoward
event.</p>

<p>The Messrs. Woodward’s scientific snake would not have crept into
these pages had it not previously figured in the <i>Zoologist</i>, and
thence copied in other prints, thereby misleading many readers. It
also proved a subject worth discussing by thinking persons, and was
alluded to very particularly by an ophiological friend and publisher
in a letter to myself, which may be here usefully quoted. My friend,
who has long stimulated me by his kind encouragement of my work, and by
the assistance of his experience and judgment, was pleased to express
much interest in a little paper on the <i>Deirodon</i><a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a>, which I had
written for <i>Aunt Judy’s<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[73]</a></span> Magazine</i>, he having read it shortly before
the appearance of the Messrs. Woodward’s statement in the <i>Zoologist</i>,
April 1875:&mdash;</p>

<p>‘In this month’s <i>Zoologist</i>,’ wrote my friend, ‘a writer says that a
certain snake makes havoc of the hen-house, by boring a hole in the
egg and sucking its contents! Can this be true? To a letter of mine to
Mr. Newman (the then editor of the <i>Zoologist</i>), on the subject, he
replies, “With regard to snakes eating eggs, it has been repeated so
often that I cannot help fearing Mr. Woodward may have <i>imbibed the
notion from American sources</i>. It is so common in the United States to
find snakes in holes in the bottoms of trees made by woodpeckers, that
it seems almost impossible to resist the conviction that they enter
these holes to get the birds themselves, or their young, or their eggs.
It must be regretted that those witnesses who come into court with
such evidence are not, generally speaking, the kind of close observers
in whose dicta we can place implicit reliance.” This,’ continues my
correspondent, ‘Mr. Newman writes after I had suggested that some
families of snakes have triturating powers (learned from <i>Aunt Judy</i>)
in the throat, independent altogether of palatal teeth. The subject
seems to be as much steeped in the unknown, as are the ways of the
beautiful creatures themselves.’</p>

<p>This from a well-known and highly-popular publisher, a man of
education, culture, and scientific attainments, though snakes hitherto
had not been his specialty, any more than that of the late editor of
the <i>Zoologist</i>. The latter, however, admitting his doubts on the
subject of ophidian egg-feeders, would have done well to have added
a note to that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[74]</a></span> effect to the account given by Mr. Woodward, which,
simply from its appearance in a scientific journal, might be received
as authority.</p>

<p>A few more well-known proofs of ophidian taste for eggs may conclude
this chapter. Of our own green or ring snake (<i>Coluber natrix</i>), Mr.
Bell says, ‘It feeds upon young birds, <i>eggs</i>, and mice, but prefers
frogs.’ In Balfour’s <i>India</i>, on the subject of cobra-worship, mention
is made of the snakes getting into larders for <i>eggs</i> and milk, and
being protected as the good genius of the house on such occasions.</p>

<p>But the Hindû custom of placing eggs for snakes at their serpent
festivals must be too familiar to most of my readers to need further
comment.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-074.jpg" width="200" height="108"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[75]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-075.jpg" width="500" height="112"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER IV.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>DO SNAKES DRINK?</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap06">PERHAPS in no other branch of natural history has such a degree of
interest been awakened during the last decade, and such an advance made
as in ophiology. The result of a spirit of inquiry thus set afloat is
that information is being continually elicited from travellers and
observers. Those who now entertain predilections for this branch of
science, will many of them admit that whatever interest they feel in
the subject has been of a comparatively recent date; that since they
have at all studied snake nature, they have repeatedly had to combat
with preconceived notions. Again and again they have been ‘surprised to
learn that so-and-so’&mdash;some now established fact, perhaps&mdash;is the case,
when they had ‘<i>always</i> thought’&mdash;probably something quite the contrary.</p>

<p>This has been frequently verified in my own experience in my
correspondence with really scholarly men, who have generously admitted
as much. Not a few, during my ten years’ study of the Ophidia, have
traced their interest in snakes to my own enthusiasm. Preconceived
errors are not<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[76]</a></span> to be wondered at when we consider that, apart from
scientific works, so much that has been related of serpents has
been mingled with prejudice, fable, and tradition, clouding our
intelligence at the very outset. Nor need we hesitate in admitting our
misconceptions, when we find scientific men themselves devoting page
after page to a mooted question, and after all, sometimes venturing to
sum up a given subject with a modest doubt only. (Would that the less
scientific writers were equally cautious in their statements!) Whether
snakes drink, and <i>what</i> they drink, have been among these debated
questions.</p>

<p>Those who possess a love for natural history are, of course, acquainted
with the works of the eminent naturalist, Dr. Thomas Bell, on our
native fauna; and those who admit their interest in the much-maligned
snakes have included in their studies his <i>British Reptiles</i>.<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> In
one portion of that work, where science is so charmingly blended with
personal observations, we are carried on to the heaths and commons to
watch our pretty little agile lizards skim across the grass, and flit
away with legs too fleet for us to follow them.</p>

<p>We linger on the banks of a stream where a ring snake lies in wait for
a frog; and then we are conducted into Mr. Bell’s study, where the same
harmless creature, now tamed, is nestling in his sleeve, or lapping
milk from his hand.</p>

<p>Most of my readers also, whether naturalists or not, are familiar
with some of the numerous works on India, its creeds, customs, and
superstitions, where mention is so frequently made of cobra-worship,
and of the natives setting saucers of milk near its hole to conciliate
and propitiate<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[77]</a></span> the serpent. Familiar to us all, too, is the picture of
a little child with a bowl of milk on its lap, and a snake receiving
a tap with the spoon to check the too greedy intrusion of its head
into the bowl, but into which, according to the story, it had been
accustomed and permitted to dip its tongue. Some persons place that
story in Wales; others, and with better reason, trace it to New
England. The child and its surroundings, the size of the snake, all
justify this latter belief, and that the intruder is the notorious
milk-stealer so common in the United States, the ‘black snake,’ or
Racer (introduced p. 64).</p>

<p>In the face of these well-known facts, it may seem strange to propose
the question, ‘Do snakes ever drink?’ and still stranger to affirm that
this was lately a disputed point among some of our scientific writers.
‘On s’ignore,’ says Schlegel, ‘si les serpents boivent, et s’il est
juste d’opiner pour la negative; toutefois on n’a jamais aperçu des
fluides dans ceux dont on a examiné l’estomac.’<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a></p>

<p>Schlegel, when he wrote, had not the benefit of Mr. Bell’s experience,
and as a foreigner, probably he had not read Jesse’s <i>Gleanings</i> nor
White’s <i>Selborne</i>; nor, as a scientific student, had he time to bestow
on promiscuous works on India, which, by the way, were not so numerous
then as now. But there are several well-known milk-drinking snakes
in America which had been described by writers prior to Schlegel.
This learned author, however, puts down the milk-loving snakes among
the ‘fables’ and ‘prejudices;’ and, as we have seen, dismissed the
water-drinkers with a doubt.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[78]</a></span></p>

<p>Mr. Bell’s work has enjoyed upwards of thirty years’ popularity, and
his milk-drinking pet has been quoted by scores of writers of both
adult and juvenile books. Thomas Bell, F.L.S., F.G.S., was secretary
to the Royal Society; Professor of Zoology of King’s College, London;
and one of the Council of the Zoological Society of London. He was
also a ‘corresponding member’ of the learned societies of Paris and
Philadelphia, and of the Boston Society of Natural History.</p>

<p>As a gentleman of widely recognised learning and veracity, therefore,
it may be considered that Mr. Bell, and with good reason, entertained
no doubt whatever as to snakes drinking, and also drinking milk. Mr.
Bell, moreover, had known of the celebrated python at Paris (see chap.
xxiv.), which in 1841 evinced a thirstiness that has become historical
in all zoological annals. The circumstance was fully recorded by M.
Valenciennes at the time; when a no less distinguished ophiologist
than M. Dumeril,<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> <i>Professeur d’Erpétologie au Musée à Paris</i>,
was especially appointed to the management of the reptile department
there. That very distinguished ophidian lady, the python, need be
referred to here only as regards the drinking question, the rest of her
history coming in its place in this book. It will be remembered that
she laid eggs, and to the surprise of all, coiled herself upon them
to hatch them. ‘Pendant tout le temps d’incubation la femelle n’a pas
voulu manger’ (she began to incubate on the 6th May); ‘mais le 25<sup>e</sup> de
mai, après vingt jours de couvaison, son gardien, Vallée, homme très
soigneux et très intelligent, la voyant plus inquiète que de coutume,
remeuée la tête, et lui<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[79]</a></span> présenta de l’eau dans un petit basin; elle
y plongea le bout de son museau, et l’animal en <i>but</i> avec avidité
environs de deux verres. Elle a ensuite bu quatre fois pendant le reste
du temps de sa couvaison: le 4 juin, 13, 19, 26.’ (Her eggs began to
hatch early in July.)</p>

<p>The interesting invalid, ordinarily tame and gentle, had latterly
displayed anger and irritability on being disturbed, pushing away
the hand if touched; but in her present state the want of water was
so great that she evinced uneasiness to her guardian, and permitted
him to move and turn her head, so that she could dip the end of her
muzzle into the basin. The narrator argued, from this remarkable
demonstration, that the incubation (in which a rise of temperature was
observable) produced a sort of feverishness which caused her to decline
solid food, though her thirst was so great that she almost asked for
drink.</p>

<p>When eight of the fifteen eggs were hatched, the little pythons ate
nothing until after their first moult (which happened to them all
within a fortnight), but during those early days of their existence
they ‘<i>drank several times</i>, and also bathed themselves.’</p>

<p>This event perhaps established the fact beyond any doubt that snakes
do drink, so far as modern and scientific ophiologists had ventured to
decide; and M. Dumeril, from long observation, is able to tell us how.</p>

<p>Speaking of the tongue of a snake, this experienced naturalist informs
us that ‘cette langue fort longue sert-elle comme on l’a observée
quelquefois à faire pénétrer un peu de liquide dans la bouche, car nous
avons vu nous-même des couleuvres laper ainsi l’eau, que nous avions
placée auprès<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[80]</a></span> d’elles dans la cage, où nous les tenions renfermées
pour les observer à loisir.’<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a></p>

<p>But, as he goes on to describe, ‘quelques serpents avalent de l’eau
sans se servir de la langue pour laper. Alors ils tiennent la tête
enfoncée sous l’eau au-dessous du niveau, ils écartent un peu les
mâchoires, et font baisser le fond de la gorge, dans laquelle l’eau
descend par son propres poids.’ You can then perceive the slight
movements of swallowing, like a thirsty man gulping down a beverage (<i>à
la régalade</i>).</p>

<p>What follows affords an explanation of M. Schlegel’s statement that
he had never discovered water in a snake which he had dissected, this
learned author not having gone so thoroughly into the matter. ‘Cette
eau,’ says M. Dumeril, ‘sert à laver les intestines; car elle est
rendue liquide avec les fèces, elle ne parait pas expulsée par les
voies urinaires.’</p>

<p>M. Dumeril speaks very clearly on this point both in his introductory
preface, and again in vol. vi., under the more detailed descriptions of
each especial sense and organ.</p>

<p>Snakes rarely drink (that is, not every day, as most animals do),
most of them living in dry regions or forests, where for long periods
they are deprived of water. The live prey upon which they subsist
supplies them with sufficient liquid. This may be known by the natural
discharges, which are usually of a liquid nature. Nevertheless, a large
number of serpents live close to water, and love to plunge and to swim.
These truly drink,&mdash;lapping with the tongue, as above described; at
other times with the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[81]</a></span> head under water, and the neck still lower, so
that the water <i>falls into the mouth by its own weight</i>, and is then
swallowed. But this, he repeats, does not go into the blood, or <i>very
little</i> of it, <i>car ils rendent en grand partie</i>, etc., as above, its
function being principally to moisten the intestines.</p>

<p>Lenz, a German ophiologist of still earlier date than Schlegel,
went very conscientiously into the subject of whether snakes drink
or not,<a name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a> having adopted various means in order to test them. His
personal experience was, however, of a more limited range.</p>

<p>It is worth while to bear in mind the dates of some of these writings,
both that we may watch the gradual advance of ophidian knowledge, and
also that we may the better appreciate the vast amount of time, care,
labour, and research by which we are finally put in possession of facts
of natural history.</p>

<p>As a comparatively modern writer, Lenz, without doubt, made very
valuable contributions to the science of ophiology, and at a time when
fact was only beginning to be sifted from fable. It will be seen that,
though writing several years before Schlegel, he had arrived at the
same conclusions.</p>

<p>‘The numerous snakes and other animals which inhabit arid mountains,
or plains destitute of water, can only quench their thirst with rain
or dew. Snakes require but little water as long as they live in the
open air. It is an established rule that no water is found in the maw,
stomach, or entrails of snakes killed in the open air, even when<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[82]</a></span>
destroyed by or in a piece of water. <i>Snakes are never seen to go to
drink in any part of the world.</i>’</p>

<p>This last clause is, as we have now seen, a too positive assertion,
and one not subsequently borne out by other equally conscientious and
intelligent writers. Livingstone, who was a close observer of nature,
informs us that he has known some of the African snakes <i>come a long
way to pools and rivers to drink</i>. Dr. Theodore Cantor, who is one of
the best authorities on the Indian sea snakes, and who was a member
of the Zoological Society, tells us that he has seen snakes ‘both
drink and also moisten the tongue; <i>two distinct operations</i>,’ he
explains.<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> This conviction having been stated prior to Dumeril’s
elaborate and much-prized work, is valuable testimony. The majority of
snakes in India are partial to water, he tells us, with the exception
of the arboreal species, which probably obtain sufficient moisture from
the rain or dew upon the leaves; and as it is not in their nature to be
on the ground, their organization doubtless renders them independent of
water.</p>

<p>We of late so often see it said of any particular snakes in captivity
that ‘they neither ate nor drank at first;’ or that ‘they drank, though
they would not eat,’ that we almost wonder their bibulous propensities
were ever doubted; especially as the majority of snakes are fond of
water, and swim readily. We are surprised, therefore, that the second
edition of Mr. Lenz’ really valuable work, published so lately as 1870,
should still retain the assertion that snakes have never been <i>seen</i> to
drink.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[83]</a></span></p>

<p>Mr. Frank Buckland saw his Coronella drink frequently, though she
ate nothing; and as the discovery and captivity of this interesting
lady and her brood, born in London in 1862,<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id="FNanchor_20_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> formed the subject of
many papers in the scientific journals at the time, one would suppose
that they would have been heard of in Germany, where the species (<i>C.
lævis</i>) is well known.</p>

<p>‘Though not to be tempted with food, they are very fond of water,’ says
Mr. F. Buckland.</p>

<p>Lenz’ experiments are, however, well worth noticing, because subsequent
observations have in many instances confirmed this author’s conclusions.</p>

<p>‘In confinement,’ he says, ‘snakes are more easily induced to lick up
drops sprinkled on grass than to drink from a vessel.’ Naturally so. In
their native haunts they are not accustomed to pans of water or saucers
of milk, but they <i>are</i> accustomed to moisten their tongues on the
blades of grass or the leaves of plants which hold the drops of rain
or dew. Lenz then mentions some experiments which he himself made with
snakes. He placed a ring snake and an adder in an empty box, and kept
them there without food for a fortnight, at the end of which period he
placed them in a tub containing half an inch of water, and left them
there for half an hour. He then killed them both, and on dissection
found no water inside of them. This led him to the conclusion that
they had not drank at all; but, in the first place, had they occupied
the whole half-hour in lapping with their thread-like tongue, it may
be doubted whether any appreciable quantity could be imbibed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[84]</a></span> during
that time; and in the second place, the sudden transition and strange
situation in which they found themselves would, through fright,
entirely destroy whatever inclination they might have had to appease
hunger or thirst.</p>

<p>It will be seen that snakes are exceedingly capricious in taking food;
and that when in an abnormal or strange locality they rarely feed for
a long while. Mr. Lenz himself is of opinion that, had he left them
longer in the water, or placed them in a dry tub where liquid could
be got at, they would or might have drunk. Thus, the experiments only
go to corroborate what all keepers of snakes have observed, viz. that
captivity or strange surroundings render them averse to feed.</p>

<p>M. Lenz placed his snakes among the cows in order to test the foolish
belief that obtains in some countries that snakes will ‘suck’ the
udders; but of course, and for similar reasons, even could such an
achievement be possible, the snakes attempted no such thing.</p>

<p>His snakes were strict members of a temperance society also, for not
even wine could tempt them to drink, though this and other liquids
were placed within reach to entice their taste. Not so Pliny’s snakes,
for he would have us believe that they show ‘a great liking for wine,’
whenever an opportunity presented itself for their tasting it!</p>

<p>But how came the idea to obtain that snakes suck cows,&mdash;a fact so
frequently asserted by the older naturalists? One old writer goes so
far as to state that a certain American snake ‘causes cows to give
forth bloody milk.’ And yet, to the thinking or observing person,
the origin of the belief may be easily accounted for. That snakes
have partiality<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[85]</a></span> for milk no longer admits of a doubt; that they like
warmth and shelter is an equally established fact. Therefore, they
find their way into cattle-sheds, and hide in the straw or any snug
corner, possibly even among the recumbent cattle; and, being there,
their ever busy exploring tongues discover a savour of milk, and the
snake is led by this intelligent tongue to the very fountain of their
favourite drop. The irritated cow would then naturally stir or kick,
and endeavour to shake off the strange intruder, who, in its turn
alarmed or angered, would bite the udder, and fetch blood. This, in the
dark ages of natural history, and during the period when the serpent
was invested with all manner of cruel and revolting wilfulness, would
suffice to give rise to the belief that has so long prevailed. The
rat snake (<i>Ptyas mucosus</i>) and the <i>Clothonia</i> of India are ‘said’
to suck the teats of cows; so also are the ‘hoop snake’ and several
other American species, which, with their climbing propensities, may
sometimes twine themselves about the legs of cattle, and thus reach the
udders, where persons have discovered them. It is just possible that
the snakes may get the teat into their mouths, and advance upon it,
with the intention of swallowing it, not knowing that it was only a
teat, with a cow inconveniently attached to it, and not some small and
more manageable prey.</p>

<p>Among the American milk-drinking snakes is <i>Coluber eximius</i>, known as
the ‘milk snake,’ one of the dairy frequenters, which is said to seek
milk with avidity. This snake is mentioned by De Kay,<a name="FNanchor_21_21" id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> Emmons,<a name="FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a>
and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[86]</a></span> Holbrooke,<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id="FNanchor_23_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> who all describe it as being very beautiful and
‘innocent’ (except in the eyes of the farmers’ wives). It is of a pale,
pearly white, sometimes tinged with pink, and with rich chocolate spots
on its back. The Racer, of egg-stealing notoriety, is also a sad milk
thief, and, like our own little ring snake, has been known to retrace
its way into dairies. Such depredations were more frequent formerly
when the snakes were more numerous. Of the Racer, Lawson<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> says,
‘This Whipster haunts the Dairies of careless Housewives, and never
misses to skim the Milk clear of the Cream.’</p>

<p>The same love of warmth which takes the reptiles among cattle, guides
them into dwellings, particularly during the night; and in hot
countries where nursing-women of the poorer classes lie exposed, snakes
have been found upon their breasts, and absurd stories have been told
of their sucking the teats of women. In India, Australia, and America,
such stories are common.</p>

<p>After all, it does not seem surprising that snakes should like milk.
Being carnivorous by nature, they would at once detect an animal
flavour in the liquid by the agency of their sensitive tongue.</p>

<p>Now turning to India, we find that the love of snakes for milk is
mentioned by numerous writers on the manners and customs of the Hindûs,
as well as by travellers and naturalists. Balfour<a name="FNanchor_25_25" id="FNanchor_25_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> tells us ‘when
a snake discovers how to get at the eggs and <i>milk</i> in a larder, no
native will on any account kill it, because it is regarded as the good
genius of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[87]</a></span> house.’ And again, ‘that the cobra is fed with <i>milk</i> in
some of the temples where it is worshipped.’</p>

<p>Dr. Shortt of Madras keeps a man to attend to his cobras, and finds
they thrive excellently on sour milk, which is administered once in
ten or twelve days.<a name="FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> ‘Snakes feed on eggs and <i>milk</i>,’ says Sir J.
Fayrer.</p>

<p>When we read similar facts mentioned incidentally, and with no especial
object, we may give them credence even more than if a prejudiced writer
were endeavouring to prove such or such a thing. For instance, during
the visit of H.R.H. the Prince of Wales to India, the exhibition
of snakes and snake-charming formed a not unimportant item in the
programme, and furnished many columns of cobra performances and
cobra traditions to the papers. More than one of the journalists
unintentionally corroborated what Balfour and other writers tell us
about the ‘good luck’ of having a cobra in the <i>chuppur</i> of the hut,
the fearlessness with which the children regard their ‘uncle,’ as they
call it, and their care in placing <i>milk</i> and eggs for it each evening.</p>

<p>But I am reminded of a singular case which came to me through a
personal acquaintance from India who was present at the time.</p>

<p>Four officers sitting in a bungalow in India were deep in a game of
whist. Suddenly one of them, turning deadly pale, made signs that no
one should move or speak. In a hushed voice he exclaimed, ‘Keep still,
for God’s sake! I feel a cobra crawling about my legs!’ He knew that
timidity was one of the strongest characteristics of this snake, and
that if not disturbed or alarmed, it would in due<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[88]</a></span> time depart of its
own accord. All present were accustomed to the stealthy intruders, and
did not, happily, lose their presence of mind. They very noiselessly
bent down so as to take a survey beneath the table, when, sure enough,
there was the unwelcome visitor, a full-sized cobra, twining and
gliding about the legs of their hapless friend. Literally death was at
his feet! A movement, a noise, even an agitated tremble might have been
fatal.</p>

<p>Luckily one of the four was acquainted with the milk-loving habit of
the cobra, and rising from his seat with quiet and cautious movements,
not daring to hasten, yet dreading delay, he managed to steal from
the room, while he signed the rest to remain motionless. Quickly he
crept back with a saucer of milk in his hand, and still with noiseless
movements set the saucer under the table as close to the terrible
reptile as it was safe to venture.</p>

<p>That fearful strain on their nerves was happily of not long duration,
for presently they were relieved by seeing the creature gradually
untwine itself and go to the milk.</p>

<p>Never before or since did that officer leap from his seat as he did
then, the moment he felt himself free from the coils of the cobra, and
read in the faces of his comrades that he was saved. Short thrift,
however, had Mr. Cobra, for sticks and whip-handles were freely
administered, even before the saucer was reached.</p>

<p>The enemy got rid of, the game was resumed; and it is worth the while
of those in India to bear this narrow escape in mind, and bring milk to
the rescue in case of similar danger.</p>

<p>That snakes drink, and occasionally drink milk, is sufficiently<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[89]</a></span>
established. Modern authorities now affirm it decidedly. Says Dr.
Günther in his great work, published by the Ray Society,<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id="FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a> ‘All
snakes drink, and <i>die</i> when deprived of water.’ Dr. Edward Nicholson,
another of our practical ophiologists, speaking of one of his pet
snakes, a <i>Tropidonotus</i>, says ‘the offer of a drink of water will at
once gain its heart.’ In watching snakes drinking, he has frequently
counted one hundred gulps before the drinker is satisfied.<a name="FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> If
<i>Anguis fragilis</i>, the common blindworm, from its snake-like form, may
be cited here, I may mention one of my own, which, after being shut up
in a box for safety during my absence from home for some days, drank
for such a long while when first released from captivity, that I was
really tired of waiting to watch her. She almost immediately went to
a flower-pot saucer of water, with which she was familiar, and which
I placed near her. For some time I watched the tongue thrown out and
withdrawn, till I began to wonder how much longer she would remain
dipping that little bifid organ. I then began to count, and she dipped
it seventy-five times more, after drinking at least as long as that
previously. Then she moved away, and explored among the books on the
table, but soon returned to the saucer and dipped her tongue again
upwards of seventy times. How much more I cannot affirm, as I could
not remain any longer waiting for her, and left her still drinking.
(‘Lizzie,’ thus named from her lizard nature, must claim a chapter
to herself in this book, for she greatly distinguished herself in
lacertine doings.)</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[90]</a></span></p>

<p>While puzzling over this drinking question, I find a favourite author,
P. H. Gosse, affirm, ‘Snakes drink by suction, not by lapping,’ and
that ‘serpents are said to lap up fluids with their forked tongue,
which, however, seems to be ill suited to such an operation.’<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id="FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a></p>

<p>Then one naturally turns to the encyclopedias, where we grow still more
perplexed, for no two agree precisely on all points.</p>

<p>‘The use of the tongue in serpents is not exactly known.’<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id="FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> And
again, ‘It is believed that serpents never drink.’<a name="FNanchor_31_31" id="FNanchor_31_31"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_31" class="fnanchor">[31]</a> It is true that
the compiler of the article <i>Reptilia</i> quotes Schlegel a good deal;
but unfortunately that is the very point on which Schlegel speaks
doubtfully. Nor do we presume to include the learned Schlegel as one
of the inaccurately informed individuals, though he does discredit
the milk-drinkers. Of him Dumeril thus writes, or of his work rather,
which he pronounced to be ‘le plus detaillé et le plus complet qui
ait paru jusqu’ici (1844), et auquel nous serons sans cesse obligé
d’avoir recours.’ Schlegel is also quoted by Cantor, 1841; by Dr. J. E.
Gray, 1849; by Dr. A. Günther, 1864; and, in fact, by most scientific
ophiologists. Natural history is an ever-advancing science, more so,
perhaps, than any other. Linnæus and Cuvier were great in their day,
but their systems obtain no longer.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, a dozen book-makers and a thousand journalists seek
no farther than encyclopedias when they are ‘reading up’ a subject;
and not until too late, if at all, or after<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[91]</a></span> long searchings and a
realization of the importance of dates, do these wide spreaders of
information discover the error. Compilers of articles for encyclopedias
are always limited as to space, and often as to time; and life would
not be long enough to wade through <i>Zoological Records</i> covering fifty
years, or <i>Annales des sciences naturelles</i> which date from 1824 to the
present time. Only, the compilers of articles on the <i>Reptilia</i> should
surely have known of Mr. Bell’s <i>Coluber natrix</i>, and of the Paris
python, and of the <i>Amphisbæna</i> of the Zoological Gardens, all ophidian
celebrities in their day.</p>

<p>The mention of the Zoological Gardens reminds me of my promise
to conduct my readers thither as an agreeable change from the
book-shelves. Therefore, without further wearying them with the
conflicting statements of fifty writers, let us repair thither, and see
what Holland, the keeper, tells us about his thirsty snakes.</p>

<p>First, we observe that most of the cages are furnished with a tank or
a pan of water, and this not for the watersnakes only. Many of the
others, also, are lying in their bath, coiled up in apparent enjoyment.
Questioning the intelligent keeper, he tells us that when fresh
ophidian inmates arrive, they almost invariably go to the water, and
though for a time they refuse food, they <i>always drink</i>. On several
occasions some have drunk so eagerly that the water has visibly sunk in
the tank. These were the larger snakes, of course. He does ‘not believe
they would live without water.’ He then tells us the story of the
<i>Amphisbæna</i> over again, the snake that lived for six months on milk
only, and which was chronicled in the zoological magazines of the day,
and has figured in books ever since.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[92]</a></span></p>

<p>Mr. Mann confirmed all these facts in his own ophidian pets, and going
to see these interesting individuals, we felt no doubt about it when a
saucer of water was in the way.</p>

<p>But I do feel inclined to doubt whether the use of the tongue in
‘lapping,’ as it has been called, is not rather to moisten that organ
than to quench the thirst. We shall see in the following chapter what
it does for its owner, and we shall see the necessity for this delicate
organ to be well lubricated. Both it and its sheath require to be
constantly moistened; how else could it glide in and out with that
wonderful activity? how in a dry and parched condition could it retain
its exceeding flexibility and delicacy of perception?</p>

<p>Unfortunately, the position of the tanks in the cages at the London
Zoological Gardens, and the stone ledge in front of them, prevent the
visitors from watching the actions of the snakes in the water, either
when swimming or drinking. Occasionally one of the inmates of the
larger cages may be seen in a pan of water, though their motions are
necessarily restricted there. One day, however, the yellow Jamaica
boa, when drinking from the pan, afforded an excellent opportunity for
observation. And he was a long time imbibing. There was no perceptible
action of the lips, which were barely parted. The snake kept its mouth
just below the level of the water, and the only action or movement
seen was at the back of the head, or on each side of the neck, like
a pulsation, as the water passed down in short gulps. This is the
‘suction’ which writers describe, a drawing in of the liquid; but the
lips do not take part in the act. When, therefore, we read that snakes
drink both by lapping and also by suction, we may surmise that the
former<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[93]</a></span> is for the benefit of the tongue, the latter of the body; and
a large quantity of liquid is often drawn in by this sort of suction,
very distinct from ‘sucking,’ the reputed way of enjoying milk from the
living fountain, and a process impossible to creatures that have not
soft lips and a broad tongue. The Jamaica boa drew in those perceptible
gulps for a long time, then raised his head, and rested awhile, and
presently drank again, and this several times while we were watching.
It was what Dumeril described <i>à la régalade</i>.</p>

<p>Mr. Sam Lockwood of New Jersey, writing in the <i>American Naturalist</i>,
vol. ix. 1875, describes the pine snake drinking. ‘It lays its head
flat upon the water, letting the lower jaw just sink a little below the
surface, when with a very uniform movement the water is drawn up into
the mouth and passed into the throat. It is true drinking, like that of
a horse.’ One that he watched drank five minutes by the clock without
taking breath. Then it paused, looked about for three minutes, and then
drank again for five minutes more. ‘In all, it drank a little over a
gill. Previously it has been without water for four weeks.’</p>

<p>In size this pine snake differs not much from the Jamaica boa
(<i>Chilobothrus inornatus</i>), that we watched at the Gardens, and the
manner and time were very similar. True, we did not time him by a
watch, nor could we tell exactly how much he drank, nor how long
previously he had been without drinking; but, at a guess, he could not
have been much less than five minutes without taking breath. <i>Anguis
fragilis</i>, that lapped seventy times, and stopped, and lapped again,
must also have been some minutes without breathing, because hers was
the most leisurely lapping I ever saw.</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[94]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-001.jpg" width="500" height="109"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER V.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE TONGUE OF A SNAKE.</i></p>

<p class="pch reduct">PART I.&mdash;WHAT IT IS <i>NOT</i>.</p>

<p class="drop-cap08">GOSSIP from the Zoological Gardens to confirm what has been so often
said, namely, that nine out of every ten of the visitors to the
Ophidarium will point to the tongue of a snake and exclaim, ‘Look
at its sting!’ seems too trivial and too defiantly challenging the
credulity of my readers, to introduce here. Nevertheless, that it is
necessary emphatically to state not only that the tongue of a snake is
not its sting, but that a snake has no sting at all, you will admit
the very next time you go there. You will hear not only the Monday,
but the <i>Sunday</i> visitors&mdash;well dressed, and apparently well educated
persons&mdash;say to each other when watching a snake, ‘That’s its sting!’ I
must be permitted, therefore, to ‘gossip’ a moment in confirmation.</p>

<p>One Friday, in April 1881, just before the time when the public were
excluded at feeding hours, we were watching the movements of a pretty
little harmless snake, the rapid quivering of whose tongue denoted
excitement of some<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[95]</a></span> kind. Probably it was anticipating the frog in
store for it, as this was feeding day. Its tongue was unusually active,
and was exserted to its extreme length, its motions being almost
invisible in their rapidity.</p>

<p>Two gentlemen drew near, and also stopped before this cage. One of
them, a tall, dark man, looked like a foreigner; but he was talking
pure English to his friend, and had been talking a good deal about the
snakes, as if he were familiar with their habits. ‘From the Tropics,’
observed my companion, <i>sotto voce</i>, and looking as if we might hear
something worth knowing from this large, loud-voiced visitor.</p>

<p>‘See <i>that</i>?’ he presently exclaimed to his friend. ‘Look there!’</p>

<p>‘That thing it keeps putting out of its mouth?’</p>

<p>‘Yes. That’s its sting. One touch of that, just one little touch, and
you’re a dead man. There’s no cure for it!’</p>

<p>No less than four different parties made similar remarks in our hearing
during our short visit to the reptile house that day, and these not of
the common crowd either.</p>

<p>First, two lads who looked as if they ought to have known better. Next,
a party of several persons, of whom the one more particularly addressed
when his friend informed him, ‘That’s the sting that it jerks out so,’
replied, ‘Ah, but they extract it!’ Thirdly, a young gentleman remarked
to his lady companion, ‘See how it keeps darting out its sting!’ to
whom she ejaculated, ‘Oh, the fearful creature!’ Fourthly, the tall
man. And all this of poor little innocent <i>Tropidonotus</i> (our common
ring snake), with not even a fang to injure you!</p>

<p>Like many other of the zoological myths not yet extinct,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[96]</a></span> this
‘stinging tongue’ has its origin in mystery. Long before a deadly
serpent was examined by an intelligent reasoner, and the nature of its
fatal stroke comprehended, the mysterious ‘dart’ was seen to play;
this, to the ignorant, being the only visible and possible instrument
of such fatality. But that the fable should still obtain is amazing.
Even some learned men of the present century, if they do not happen to
have included natural history in their studies, assist in disseminating
the error. Can they, however, be acquainted with classical writers?
Pliny, to whom many of the old-time errors in natural history have
been traced, must be acquitted as regards the poisonous tongue; for
though he speaks of the ‘sting’ of a serpent, I do not recall that he
once attributed the injury to the tongue. Aristotle, whose reputation
as a naturalist ranks far higher, distinctly and frequently speaks of
the <i>bite</i>, and the degrees of injury inflicted by the various kinds
of serpent bites. It is possible that some classical writers may have
supposed the tongue to be an instrument of death, as it is certain
that some of the sacred writers did. But our inherited faith in Bible
history has, until recently, checked all doubt and even inquiry. Now,
however, that a new version of Holy Writ has been deemed essential, it
is to be hoped that an efficient naturalist is included in the Council.</p>

<p>In justification of the above criticism I may be permitted to quote
just one of the many unquestioning writers. The author of the <i>History
of Egypt</i>, W. Holt Yates, M.R.C.P. of London, President of the Royal
Medical Society of Edinburgh, Physician to the General Dispensary,
etc., says in a footnote (vol. i. p. 322), ‘It is a mistake to suppose
that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[97]</a></span> snakes hurt only with their teeth. Some have no teeth, but only
hard gums. Others only attack with their tongue&mdash;the same end is
attained in either case by the insertion of the poison.’</p>

<p>Now were you to ask that writer, as I have several times asked persons
who were under the same impression, ‘What reason have you to suppose
that the snake’s tongue is poisonous?’ he would very likely reply,
‘Oh! well&mdash;it <i>is</i> venomous. I always thought so.’ Then, reflectively,
he might add, ‘Poisonous-tongued?&mdash;“whose tongue outvenoms”&mdash;“with
deadlier tongue than thine, thou serpent”’&mdash;or some such familiar
words, proving that his idea was poetical, imaginative, and acquired he
can scarcely explain how.</p>

<p>What very little he knew about snakes, then, was learned from
Shakspeare&mdash;we say Shakspeare, for what other author has been read and
re-read, and committed to memory, and quoted during the last three
centuries like the Bard of Avon? The bard, genius though he was, and
wide his field of information, was certainly <i>not</i> a naturalist. Nor
did he make any pretensions to be one. He was as unconscious of the
errors in natural history which he was handing down to posterity, as
he was unconscious of his own enduring fame; or that he would be ‘the
immortal bard’ three hundred years later, with every probability of
ever living in the human mind as such.</p>

<p>His idea of the poisonous tongue of a snake was the prevalent one of
his day. It was an inherited prejudice, which he had never stopped
to question, any more than nine hundred and ninety-nine out of every
thousand of his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[98]</a></span> readers have ever stopped to question the fact of an
adder’s <i>tongue</i> being poisonous, Shakspeare having affirmed that it is
so.</p>

<p>People do not read Shakspeare to learn natural history, you say. True;
but his poetry, his similes, take hold of the mind, fix themselves in
the memory, and take root; and an assertion, as in the case of the
gentle little ‘blindworm,’ takes very deep root, as it seems, and
thrives for three hundred years; or naturalists of the present day
would not feel called upon to explain that it is neither ‘blind,’ nor
‘deaf,’ nor ‘venomous.’</p>

<p>Still you reject the idea that Shakspeare through his immense and
universal popularity is responsible for a ridiculous error. Not
Shakspeare alone, then, or culpably so. But since the idea has
prevailed for thousands of years, even to the present time, and since
persons are more likely to quote Shakspeare on the subject than any
other author, let us glance at the literature of Shakspeare’s time,
and endeavour to account for his fixed impression as to a serpent’s
tongue being poisonous. Let us also try to recall from any one of the
writers of the same era, or those who wrote in English previously, any
single line on the present subject that has become so engrafted on the
mind, so incorporated with our education, as those, for example, above
quoted. There was a host of other play-writers in Shakspeare’s time,
but very few naturalists.</p>

<p>Poetry, plays, and Protestantism characterized the literature of the
period. But familiar to us <i>by name</i> as are his contemporaries, it will
be as easy to find one educated person who has read the whole of their
works, as it<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[99]</a></span> would be to find one educated person who has not read
Shakspeare.</p>

<p>There were travels and histories written, the great maritime
discoveries of the age giving birth to this new class of literature.
Hakluyt’s voyages were printed when Shakspeare was only twenty-five
years of age, and even if he read them he would not have learned much
about serpents there. Nor in Sir Walter Raleigh’s histories either,
which were written chiefly during his prison life, he being liberated
the same year that saw the death of Shakspeare, 1616.</p>

<p>Many other well-known authors will occur to the reader, to say nothing
of the writers of the previous eras, the great divines and scholars who
wrote in Latin, and the many English ballad-writers more likely to be
perused by ‘the Bard.’</p>

<p>As for natural history, it found no place on those shelves, for as a
science it did not as yet exist in England. Lord Bacon, Shakspeare’s
celebrated contemporary, did make some pretensions to be a naturalist;
but his <i>Novum Organum</i> was written in Latin, and we are not led to
believe that the poet enjoyed any very great educational and classical
advantages, having had</p>

<p class="pp6s p1">‘Small Latin and less Greek,’</p>

<p class="pn1">according to his friend and eulogist, Ben Jonson.</p>

<p>And even if Shakspeare did read what was then <i>the Book</i> of the period,
Lord Bacon unfortunately fell into some of the popular errors, or made
very hazardous conjectures, so far as natural history was understood;
and of him Dr. Carpenter says, ‘So far from contributing to our
knowledge<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[100]</a></span> of natural history, he often gave additional force to error
by the weight of his authority.’</p>

<p>In recalling some lines from Shakspeare, the reader will find how very
familiar to the mind are the serpent similes. Some of them prove that
the poet was cognizant of a tooth being also a source of evil; but
it is evident that he thought the tongue was so also, especially the
tongue of the ‘blindworm.’</p>

<p>For a few out of the many in which Shakspeare’s plays abound, <i>vide</i>
<i>Timon of Athens</i>, Act iv. Scene 3: ‘The gilded newt and eyeless
venomed worm.’</p>

<p><i>Midsummer Night’s Dream</i>, Act iii. Scene 2. When Hermia thinks
that Demetrius has killed Lysander while sleeping, she scathingly
ejaculates: ‘O brave touch! Could not a worm, an adder do so much? An
adder did it; for with deadlier tongue than thine, thou serpent, never
adder stung!’</p>

<p>In <i>Cymbeline</i>, Act iii. Scene 2, Pisanio says: ‘What false Italian, as
poisonous tongued as handed, hath prevailed on thy too ready hearing?’
Again, in Scene 4 of the same Act, Pisanio would not hear evil of his
mistress, and cries: ‘No, ‘tis slander; whose edge is sharper than the
sword, whose tongue outvenoms all the worms.’</p>

<p><i>Henry VI.</i>, Act ii. Scene 2, Clifford says to the King: ‘Who ‘scapes
the lurking serpent’s mortal sting!’ Act iii. Scene 2: ‘Their touch
affrights me as a serpent’s sting.... What! art thou like the adder
waxen deaf? Be poisonous too!’</p>

<p><i>Much Ado about Nothing</i>, Act v. Scene 1, Antonio says: ‘As I dare take
a serpent by the tongue.’</p>

<p>And in <i>King John</i>, Act ii. Scene 1, Randolph says to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[101]</a></span> King Philip,
‘France, thou may’st hold a serpent by the tongue!’</p>

<p>Not snakes only, but toads, lizards, spiders, and other ‘creeping
things,’ were thought venomous in Shakspeare’s time.</p>

<p>Song in <i>Midsummer Night’s Dream</i>: ‘You spotted snakes, with double
tongue.’ Then, in appeal to the ‘serpents’ not to injure the Fairy
Queen: ‘Newts and blindworms, do no wrong.’</p>

<p>The nearest approach to a scientific work on natural history written in
English at that time was a curious volume published in 1608, in whose
folio pages may be seen most astonishing ‘Serpentes,’ combinations
of worms and feathered fowls, saurian, ophidian, and batrachian,
wonderfully adorned with horns, gills, wings, spear-shaped or forked
tongues, and arrow-shaped tails. The zoological illustrations of that
work give us some idea of what a snake was supposed to be. Among them
is one with a human head, and another with a crown, because he is ‘the
King of Serpentes for his Magnitude or Greatnesse.’ There is also a
‘Dragon’ with horns, wings, scales, claws, two rows of robust teeth,
and an arrow-headed tongue. Mingled fable and fancy with some few
facts, these anomalies are solemnly described as ‘The Naturall Historie
of Serpentes,’ the said serpents including bees, wasps, ‘frogges,’
toads, earthworms, lizards, spiders, etc., and a ‘cockatrice.’</p>

<p>The author, E. Topsell, addresses the ‘gentle and pious Reader’ on the
‘publishing of this Treatise of Venomous Beasts,’ and more particularly
of ‘Serpentes, Divine, Morall, and Naturell, their Poyson and Bitings,
since the gentle and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[102]</a></span> pious Reader will see how that the Historie of
Serpentes begineth at the Creation.’</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-102.jpg" width="150" height="65"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Fabulous tongues.</p>
</div></div>

<p>Thus we see that the ideal snake was a religious principle, carried
out in illustrations and architectural embellishments, where ‘that
old serpent the devil’ was depicted as a creature as terrible as
imagination could conceive it; and of course with a highly-developed
tongue in the form of a dart or a spear, more or less alarming.</p>

<p>Far in advance of Topsell, and far in advance of England, were the
naturalists of Southern Europe. Gesner, professor of philosophy at
Zurich, published his <i>Historia Animalium</i> in 1551; and Aldrovanus,
professor of philosophy and physic at Bologna, wrote thirteen folio
volumes of natural history, four only of which were published during
his lifetime, and the rest after his death, which was in 1605. These
two authors, though out of date at the present day, have left their
names perpetuated in plants and animals examined by them.</p>

<p>As one of the objects of this work is to trace the origin of some of
the many errors that have obtained regarding the serpent race, and to
note the gradual enlightenment observable in successive writers, it is
a part of our duty to quote the Bible; and this we do with reverence,
emboldened by the fact that the present state of knowledge has demanded
a new translation to satisfy the intellect of the age.</p>

<p>Shakspeare himself might have had the Bible devoutly in his mind when
he talked of the adder’s ‘sting.’</p>

<p>Among the many commentators and exponents of Holy Writ, Cruden (A.D.
1794) says, ‘Some place the venom of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[103]</a></span> the serpent in its gall, others
in its tongue, and others in its teeth.’ David seems to place it in
its tongue:&mdash;Ps. cxl. 3, ‘They have sharpened their tongues like a
serpent.’ So also Job, xx. 16, ‘The viper’s tongue shall slay him.’</p>

<p>The sacred writers, however, quite understood that serpents did bite as
well as ‘sting.’ Solomon made the same distinction that is observable
in Shakspeare, ‘biteth like a serpent, stingeth like an adder.’</p>

<p>In fact, the <i>tongue</i> of an adder, whether in allusion to ‘the worm of
the Nile,’ or to our own pretty little ‘deaf-adder,’ seems still to
bear the evil character which it has borne from time immemorial.</p>

<p>Superstition, prejudice, and ignorance are still rampant whenever a
snake is thought of. Inherited and educated antipathies regarding them
are still so strong that some persons will not even allow themselves to
<i>un</i>learn their misconceptions; others by misrepresentations do their
best to prevent a true comprehension of their habits from being better
understood; and, again, there are those who know better, and who are
even engaged in instructing others by their pen, but who fall into the
habit of encouraging horror and hatred, instead of reason, truth, and a
tolerance towards a creature wisely produced to fulfil its part and to
perform its duties in the great balance of organized beings.</p>

<p>Some journalists religiously keep up the delusion about the tongue
of a snake, by using a prejudicial prefix. From a pile of newspaper
cuttings and other printed matter relative to snakes, I transcribe a
few sentences at random, to illustrate what is meant:&mdash;‘Its horrid
forked tongue.’ ‘Its slithering tongue.’ ‘Its villanous poisonous
tongue,’ etc.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[104]</a></span> And if sensationalism seem to demand still more forcible
language, as, for instance, in describing an injury or an escape, our
journalist tells us of the ‘forked tongue darting defiance.’ ‘The
wicked-looking serpent tongue protruded with lightning-like swiftness.’
‘To see the reptile run its devilish tongue out at you.’ ‘Its horrid
lancinating tongue protruded,’ etc. These are only a few of such
sentences copied <i>verbatim</i>, but they are unfortunately too common,
even with the better-informed writers.</p>

<p>The idea of a snake being sufficiently intelligent, reasoning, and
reflective to deliberately ‘run its tongue out at you,’ as if conscious
of its own moral power and your moral weakness, is too ludicrous.
If the snake could truly inflict injury with those soft, flexible,
delicate filaments,&mdash;if it could, with one rapid touch, insert poison,
as the tall talker at the Zoological Gardens affirmed, the threatening
quiver could only be in friendly warning. Let the poor reptile at least
be thanked for that.</p>

<p>Our lamented friend, Frank Buckland, fell into the same error (or
inadvertency, since he quite understood that the tongue could do no
harm) when he wrote thus of the tongue in his <i>Curiosities of Natural
History</i>:&mdash;‘The tongue is generally protruded in order to intimidate
the bystanders;’ and, ‘The tongue acts as a sort of intimidation
to its aggressors;’ thus giving the snake the credit of a waggish
sort of intelligence, far more complimentary to the reptile than
to the bystander. In imagination we behold a solemn Convention of
snakes, held in ages long ago, and a resolution to this effect passed
unanimously:&mdash;‘Now these poor ignorant mortals think we can kill them<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[105]</a></span>
with our soft and tender tongues. Though so tall, and powerful, and
terrible to us, they look dreadfully frightened whenever we use our
tongues in our own service. Therefore, whenever any of these two-legged
creatures come near us, we will put out our tongues at them, and
frighten them off,’&mdash;a resolution which has answered admirably well
down to the present time. ‘Down to the present time’ is written and
repeated in all seriousness.</p>

<p>Let me be pardoned for introducing a little more gossip here, as it is
the fashion to relate what is seen and heard at the Zoological Gardens.
And so much is related, and has been related, and even printed, to
mislead the public, that, in the earnest hope and aspiration of
assisting in correcting false impressions, I claim to repeat what was
heard as well as the rest. Besides, when persons talk as loudly as if
they were delivering a lecture, and apparently with the benevolent
intention of instructing the public generally, one feels justified in
quoting them.</p>

<p>Eight years ago, when first contemplating this work, and anxiously
seeking to ascertain precisely what could be learned, and what was
already understood about snakes, so far as the reptile house at the
Zoological Gardens was a means of instruction, I made very careful
notes of what I saw there, and occasionally of what I <i>heard</i> there.</p>

<p>In the summer of 1874 some well-dressed children, accompanied by their
parents, were watching the pythons in the largest cage, when one of
the little ones asked, ‘Papa, what is that thing that the snake keeps
putting out of its mouth?’ ‘Oh, that is its poisonous sting,’ replied
the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[106]</a></span> father. The eldest girl (in her teens), with an affected shudder,
cried ‘Ugh!’ and a boy exclaimed, ‘I am glad it can’t put it through
the glass at <i>us</i>!’</p>

<p>August 3, 1877.&mdash;A gentleman, to all appearance well-bred and
intelligent, told his two boys, ‘That’s the sting,’ as they were
watching the play of a snake’s tongue in one of the cages. The boys
looked wonderingly at the terrible instrument, and were evidently
anxious to know more about it, and turned to ask their father. But he
had passed on, and was then calling to them to look at something else.</p>

<p>July 1880.&mdash;A lady, apparently the governess of two girls of about
twelve and fourteen, and of a boy of about eight, who were with her,
was conscientiously endeavouring to blend instruction with amusement,
and was telling them some strange and hitherto unheard-of facts
about the snakes; as, for instance, that the rattlesnake was now
going to ‘crush a guinea-pig by winding itself round it;’ for it was
feeding-day, and the keeper had just put poor piggy into the cage.
But the children got tired of waiting to see what did not occur; the
rattlesnake was merely investigating matters by means of its useful
tongue. ‘Now, watch it!’ cried the lady eagerly, ‘and you’ll see it
lick the guinea-pig with its poisonous tongue.’</p>

<p>Neither was this feat performed by the Crotalus, and as the children
got tired of waiting, and were impatient to ‘see something else,’ the
party moved on.</p>

<p>But the reader will be weary of hearing what the tongue of a snake is
<i>not</i>, and be desirous of knowing what it <i>is</i>; and to this purpose we
will devote another chapter.</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[107]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-107.jpg" width="500" height="119"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER VI.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE TONGUE OF A SNAKE.</i></p>

<p class="pch reduct">PART II.&mdash;WHAT IT <i>IS</i>.</p>

<p class="drop-cap04">IF only by the law of compensation, another chapter must be devoted to
the innocent tongue of a snake. It has been an object of hatred and
aversion for untold ages, and the misrepresentation of it, and the
abuse of it, would fill many chapters. Were it endowed with speech, and
the words of St. James applied to it,&mdash;‘the tongue is a fire, a world
of iniquity,’&mdash;no stronger animosity could be displayed.</p>

<p>Happily, this animosity is by degrees dying away; but only by degrees,
as we have seen, some writers during the last twenty years having
been undergoing a sort of transition state with regard to the use of
the tongue, inasmuch as, while they have arrived at the conviction
that it does not ‘sting,’ they are not yet quite clear as to what it
does do. Some few have even clung to the lubrication theory. <i>Popular
writers</i>, to speak more correctly, not scientific ones. Still, it is
the popular writers who most influence<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[108]</a></span> the casual reader. To satisfy a
passing interest, we turn to these, to the books they quote, and next
to encyclopedias, and not to scientific text-books, where we are beset
by technicalities which are in themselves a study to be first mastered.
Otherwise, from scientific works a good deal might have been learned
long ago about this exceedingly wonderful organ, the tongue of a snake.</p>

<p>It is evident, however, that a good many of our drawing-room
naturalists have not thought it necessary to first devote themselves to
the scientific study of a snake’s tongue before they ventured to write
about it; therefore they remained only partially enlightened. To such
an extent has the supposed ‘lubrication’ prevailed, that ophiologists
of the day have not thought it too trivial to speak of and to refute.
The same visitors to the Zoological Gardens who tell their friends or
children to look at the snake’s ‘sting,’ also wait to ‘see the snake
lick the rabbit all over before it begins to swallow it.’</p>

<p>Were a painter to set to work to paint a house, or a mason to whitewash
the ceiling, with a camel’s-hair pencil, it would not be a more tedious
and impossible process than that of a snake ‘licking all over with its
tongue’ the body of the animal it is about to devour. Illustrations, in
order to be as startling as possible, and to feed the educated horror
of snakes, often represent a boa or an anaconda coiled round a bull or
some other equally large and rough-coated animal, which, as the writer
informs us, ‘it was seen to lick all over and cover with its mucus.’</p>

<p>Let the reader reflect a moment, and he will perceive what supply
of moisture this degree of lubrication would<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[109]</a></span> demand. Even were the
snake’s whole body furnished with salivary glands, and were it provided
with a broad, flat tongue to work with, what must the rate of secretion
be to enable the snake to go through such a task, and to enable it to
perform it in a period of time in which a spectator (supposing he had
sufficient powers of endurance) could stand by and watch the process!</p>

<p>Snakes are, it is true, supplied very abundantly with a mucous saliva.
Describing the mode of swallowing, Dr. Günther says: ‘But for the
quantity of saliva discharged over the body of the prey, deglutition
would be slow.’ Slow in comparison with the feeding of other animals
it is, under any circumstances, and it would be painfully tedious,
almost impossible, for the unfortunate reptile to feed at all, were
its difficulties not relieved by this ‘abundant supply’ of saliva.
But this is not saying that the tongue performs any office in
systematic lubrication. It simply means that the mouth of the hungry
snake ‘waters’ over its food, and waters far more freely than is the
usual case with other animals. We ourselves know something of this
stimulation of the salivary glands at the sight or smell of food when
we are hungry; but snakes are beneficently provided with the salivary
apparatus (described in the first chapter), and the mouth waters
over its prey, as much when the tongue is in its sheath as when the
tongue is engaged in its own peculiar and distinct functions. What the
spectator does see is this tongue fulfilling its office of feeling,
examining, exploring, investigating, ascertaining whether the prey is
thoroughly dead, and the best way of setting to work on the great task
of swallowing the huge, rough mass. All this work the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[110]</a></span> tongue does for
its owner; and we shall, as I hope, see before we have done with it,
that so far from exciting our hatred and disgust, there is perhaps no
other feature or organ belonging to the helpless snake so important
to it, so worthy of our own observation and admiration, as this
much-abused tongue.</p>

<p>We have an admirable opportunity for study in our visits to the
Zoological Gardens, and there the lover of nature can decide for
himself. Hours and hours has one watched, and I admit (in the early
days of my studies) <i>waited</i>, to see this lubrication which, as the
books told me, was performed by the tongue. Often and often one has
heard visitors say to each other when they have seen the prey about to
be devoured, ‘Now we shall see, or you will see’ (as the case might be)
‘the snake lick it all over before he swallows it.’</p>

<p>An observation to this effect was once made in our hearing while I was
on the point of asking the keeper if he had ever observed anything of
the kind, and was telling him how often it had been so stated in print.</p>

<p>‘Snakes never did, and never <i>will</i>, lick their prey, ma’am,’ returned
Holland emphatically; ‘but I have seen the saliva flow, it is so
plentiful.’ And so have I, and so may you, patient reader, if you are
sufficiently interested in the subject. You will soon become convinced
that such a process as ‘licking’ is impossible, and you will soon
decide that if the reptile did this instinctively, its tongue would
have developed into something more like that of a cat, strong and rough
with tiny spines, or some organ better adapted to the performance than
a thin pencil or fork of tender flesh.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[111]</a></span></p>

<p>It is much to be regretted that a number of anecdotes which describe
this ‘lubrication’ have been retained and quoted over and over again in
books on snakes. Writers who are conscientiously instructing us, and
who are even telling us ‘snakes do <i>not</i> lick their prey,’ quote the
anecdotes which tell us that they <i>do</i>, and thus appear to favour the
assumed mistake.</p>

<p>Space will not permit of the numerous examples which might be here
introduced in proof of this. Nor is it necessary to name more than
two or three of these misleading anecdotes; the reader will at once
recognise them, for they appear everywhere.</p>

<p>First comes the M’Leod narrative, which has found favour with popular
writers for no less than sixty-three years! The first edition of the
<i>Voyage of the Alceste</i>, by Dr. M’Leod, the surgeon on board, was
published in London in 1817, a second edition in 1818, and a third
(so popular was the work) in 1819. His account of feeding the boa
constrictor was not the least popular part of the little book; for in
those days there were few who knew what to believe where a snake was
concerned. The account of a goat being swallowed fills several pages,
written in a style to exaggerate horrors, and apparently deny to the
reptile any right to obey nature’s laws. ‘The python fixed a deadly and
malignant eye on the goat:’ ... ‘first operation was to dart out its
forked tongue:’ ... ‘continued to grasp with its fangs:’ ... ‘began
to prepare for swallowing:’ and ‘commenced by lubricating with its
saliva:’ ... ‘commission of this murder,’ etc.</p>

<p>Maunder, in his <i>Treasury of Natural History</i>, quotes this, having
previously stated (under the head Boa Constrictor):<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[112]</a></span> ‘The prey is
then prepared for being swallowed, which the creature accomplished by
pushing the limbs into the most convenient position, and <i>then covering
the surface with a glutinous saliva</i>.’ Though not positively asserted
that the tongue is the agent in this ‘covering,’ the reader naturally
jumps to this conclusion. The ‘Penny’ and several other encyclopedias
quote the M’Leod story, among them the <i>Encyclopedia Britannica</i>, ed.
1856, notwithstanding the compiler of the article ‘Reptilia’ affirms,
‘The use of the tongue is not exactly known.’ Surely this licking over
an enormous mass of fur or wool, each time the reptile partakes of
food, would be a very important use indeed of the tongue, did such a
process take place.</p>

<p>Mr. Philip Henry Gosse, in his <i>Natural History of Reptiles</i>, 1860,
repeats the M’Leod story but he follows it up by also quoting a writer,
Broderip, who carefully considered the subject, and who doubted the
possibility of such a tongue performing this office.</p>

<p>Mr. Gosse is one of the most popular of our ‘drawing-room’ naturalists.
A careful and conscientious writer, he has contributed in his various
works a great deal of valuable information, and has done as much, if
not more, towards inducing a taste for natural history than any other
author of his day and class.</p>

<p>Another popular anecdote much used is that of Sir R. Ker Porter,
who (<i>cir.</i> 1820-24) sent an anaconda to the United Service Museum,
accompanied by an account of its seizing its prey. ‘In an instant every
bone is broken, and the long, fleshy tongue passes over the entire form
of the lifeless beast, leaving on it a sort of glutinous saliva which
greatly facilitates<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[113]</a></span> deglutition.’ This last clause was particularly
striking, and you find those three words, ‘greatly facilitates
deglutition,’ used ever since by more writers than one can enumerate.</p>

<p>A third of the many well-worn anecdotes in which the ‘lubrication’ is
conspicuous, is taken from a German journal, the <i>Ephemerides</i>, in
which a combat between a boa constrictor and a buffalo is described in
the approved sensational style, and this sentence occurs:&mdash;‘In order to
make the body slip down the throat more glibly, it (the snake) was seen
to lick the whole body over, and thus cover it with its mucus.’</p>

<p>Perhaps these three anecdotes, copied from book to book for, say, only
fifty years, have done as much to mislead regarding the second reputed
use of the tongue, as Shakspeare and his predecessors did regarding the
stinging theory.</p>

<p>Sir Robert Ker Porter published two very handsome quarto volumes
(illustrated) of his <i>Travels in Georgia, Persia, and the East</i>, during
the years 1817 to 1821. Such a work from a distinguished traveller in
that day would soon grow into popularity; but, like Dr. M’Leod, he does
not describe his snake by the cool light of science.</p>

<p>In a very able article, ‘Boa’ in the good old <i>Penny Cyclopedia</i>,
dated 1835, the writer, quoted by Mr. Philip Henry Gosse, mildly
criticises the lubrication theory, and gives at length an excellent
paper on the subject, contributed to the <i>Zoological Journal</i> in 1826
by the distinguished naturalist, W. J. Broderip, F.L.S., etc.<a name="FNanchor_32_32" id="FNanchor_32_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a>
Very courteously Mr. Broderip discusses Dr. McLeod’s description,
and in giving an account of what he himself witnessed in the manner
of a boa feeding, speaks of ‘the secretion<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[114]</a></span> of lubricating mucus
being excessive,’ and that ‘the jaws dripped with the mucus which had
lubricated the parts,’ but not once mentioning the tongue as having any
part in this function. The writer in the <i>Penny Cyclopedia</i> concludes
by saying that he had himself frequently watched the snakes while
feeding, and they ‘never covered the victim; the tongue was thrust
forth, but only,’ etc. And yet so many book-makers who must have read
this have copied the anecdotes without the comment, and have thus
popularized the lingual lubrication!</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-114.jpg" width="200" height="151"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[115]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-115.jpg" width="500" height="107"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER VII.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE TONGUE OF A SNAKE.</i></p>

<p class="pch reduct">PART III.&mdash;<i>ITS USES</i>.</p>


<p class="drop-cap08">ONE more function in which the tongue has no part it is important first
to mention. ‘It is supposed to be concerned in the function of voice,
that is, hissing,’ says Mr. Frank Buckland in his <i>Curiosities of
Natural History</i>, 1860. Now, as this is an extremely popular book, and
as Mr. Buckland was a very popular writer, and much quoted and believed
in from his pleasant and genial style, and his many opportunities, it
is necessary to explain that the tongue is often or generally in its
sheath while the snake hisses, and therefore has <i>no part whatever</i> in
the ‘function of voice.’</p>

<p>More recently still, a writer in 1876 is under the same impression.
It is well known that the contributors to that excellent magazine,
the <i>Leisure Hour</i>, are for the most part persons of good literary
standing. However, in the matter of snakes we are all only learners.</p>

<p>There are in the magazine referred to, three chapters ‘On Snakes,’
occupying, with the illustrations, about eight pages, in which the
general subject is treated.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[116]</a></span></p>

<p>‘It is a very general belief that the sting of a poisonous snake is in
its tongue,’ says this writer, ‘and to any one who has seen an adder
ready for attack, with its body coiled, its head and neck reared aloft,
and its long, narrow tongue, split for a considerable distance from
the point inwards, and thus resembling a two-pronged fork, vibrating
rapidly, accompanied by a hissing sound, the needle-like points of the
tongue have a decidedly stinging aspect. It need hardly be said that
the tongue is only responsible for the hissing.’ The hissing is from
the lungs (see chap. ix.), and, as may be repeated, often while the
tongue is within its sheath, the opening of which is forward in the
mouth.</p>

<p>The tongue of a snake occupies much the same place in the lower jaw as
that of other animals; only being, while passive, within its sheath,
which opens at the tip, the tongue can move but in one direction,
namely, <i>forwards</i>.</p>

<p>The illustration in the <i>Leisure Hour</i> which accompanies the above
writer’s explanation, displays a rattlesnake with widely-extended jaws,
and a tongue which, by comparison, must be from root to tip half a foot
in length, and represented as coming from far back in the throat, as if
no sheath existed.</p>

<p>The tongue of a snake not being so planted, and not by any possibility
intercepting the breath, it is needless to repeat that it can never
be any agent of the voice, <i>i.e.</i> ‘hissing,’ nor is it every snake
that does hiss (see chap. ix.). Illustrations conveying an entirely
erroneous impression are very much to be regretted, and unfortunately
this misplacing of the snake’s tongue is an extremely common error,
and we recognise the familiar woodcut again and again in a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[117]</a></span> number of
different publications, misconceptions thus being seriously multiplied.
Bad illustrations, even more than printed errors, are responsible,
because more persons turn the leaves of a book to look at these, than
those who read the page, and a glance either instructs or misinforms
the eye.</p>

<p>The hissing of a snake, as we may here add, is merely an escape or
expulsion of air from the lungs, more or less quick or ‘loud,’ as
the reptile is more or less alarmed or angry. Conjecturally, one may
suppose this hissing to correspond with the agitated breathing or
panting of other animals, or of an excited person.</p>

<p>In the seventeenth century, when travellers were visiting for the first
time the newly-settled colonies in America and Africa, and when the
early explorers in various parts of the world were sending home stuffed
specimens of animals (in the days when taxidermy, like other sciences,
was in its infancy), a stuffed snake was furnished with a huge, broad,
fleshy tongue, big enough to crowd its entire mouth, minus teeth and
gums.<a name="FNanchor_33_33" id="FNanchor_33_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_33" class="fnanchor">[33]</a> Whether this broad tongue was to favour the delusion of
‘licking,’ or whether the licking was presupposed from the look of the
tongue, we cannot say, but that the stuffed specimens did encourage the
delusion is clear.</p>

<p>Our Philosophical Society, founded about the middle of that century,
and the ‘Philosophical Transactions’ of those days record the first
arrival of tropical serpents in England, and the marvellous beliefs
concerning them. From them we learn, nevertheless, that many things
said to be ‘new to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[118]</a></span> science’ in our own time, were not unknown two
centuries ago.</p>

<p>Passing by a large number of writers on snakes, who, being convinced
that the tongue neither ‘stings’ nor ‘licks’ nor ‘aids in hissing,’
and who, therefore, cursorily dismiss it with, ‘the use of the tongue
is not known,’ let us thoroughly examine for ourselves this mysterious
organ; and this we can do with the assistance of those who have devoted
careful attention to the subject.</p>

<p>Quoting first our English authorities, Dr. J. E. Gray tells us: ‘Tongue
very long, retractile into a sheath at its base. Apex forked, very
long, slender, and tapering.’</p>

<p>Says Dr. Günther: ‘Tongue long, vermiform, forked; an organ of touch;
frequently and rapidly exserted to examine an object. The slightest
provocation brings the tongue into play.’</p>

<p>Rymer Jones, in his <i>Organization of the Animal Kingdom</i>, tells us that
‘in snakes the bulk of the tongue is reduced to the utmost extent. The
whole organ seems converted into a slender, bifid instrument of touch,
and is covered with a delicate membrane.’ Again, in Todd’s <i>Cyclopedia
of Anatomy</i>, the same writer says that ‘the tongue of a snake seems to
perform functions, the nature of which is not so obvious’ (as that of
some other reptiles).</p>

<p>Der Hœven (Clark’s translation) tells us ‘the tongue of a snake is an
organ of feeling or tact, and much used, as the antennæ of insects.’</p>

<p>It will be observed that while no two of the above writers use
precisely the same words, each helps us to picture the tongue
more accurately, and we glean from each some new<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[119]</a></span> particular. The
<i>Encyclopedia Britannica</i>, after telling us ‘the use of the tongue is
not exactly known,’ adds, ‘they (the snakes) are continually lancing it
into the air, and may possibly in this way gather moisture from grass
or herbage’ (alluding to the question of ‘drinking,’ see chap. iv.).</p>

<p>Professor Owen still further defines it as a pair of muscles, or
a double muscle partly connected and partly free. The reader will
prefer the learned Professor’s own words, notwithstanding the slight
repetition.</p>

<p>In his <i>Anatomy of the Vertebrates</i>, p. 463, after describing the
prehensile character of the tongue in some reptiles, notably the toad
and the chameleon, he says: ‘In serpents the tongue takes no other
share in the prehension of food than by the degree in which it may
assist in the art of drinking. It is very long, slender, cylindrical,
protractile, consisting of a pair of muscular cylinders in close
connection along the two basal thirds, but liberated from each other,
and tapering each to a point at the anterior third; these are in
constant vibration when the tongue is protruded, and are in great
part withdrawn with the undivided body of the tongue into a sheath
when the organ is retracted.’ The pair of parallel muscles can be
distinguished in the largest of the accompanying illustrations, viz.
the tongue of a Jamaica boa of about 8 feet long. It was cut out and
given me immediately after the death of the reptile, and while soft
and flexible was carefully copied. The hair-like points diminish to an
almost invisible fineness impossible to represent with pen or pencil.
The <i>slender</i> little tongue is that of the young <i>Jararaca</i>; and the
shortest is that of the African viperling. I have drawn only as much as
is usually exserted<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[120]</a></span> when in use. The entire tongues are much longer,
of a pale flesh tint, and somewhat thicker towards the root. It is
observable that the organs, like their possessors, are either shorter
and stouter, or longer and more slender.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-120.jpg" width="400" height="80"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Three tongues from nature (exact size).</p>
</div></div>

<p>The reader will concur with Mr. P. H. Gosse and the <i>Penny Cyclopedia</i>,
that ‘no instrument is less adapted for licking.’</p>

<p>There is yet one more of our English scientific writers who must be
quoted, and who, though he wrote so far back as 1834, shows us that
even then this tongue was far better understood by the French and
German zoologists than ourselves. Roget, in his <i>Animal Physiology</i>
(one of the Bridgewater Treatises), says: ‘Hellmann has shown us that
the slender, bifurcated tongue of snakes is used for the purposes of
touch.’</p>

<p>It is to be regretted that we have no translation of this and of
several other German ophiologists of whom mention is made by Roget and
others. Lenz gives us to understand that in 1817 Hellmann had decided
that a snake uses its tongue as an insect does its antennæ. And in
watching with unprejudiced eyes the varying play of the organ, the
similarity of action will at once be recognised.</p>

<p>After all, how little can we ever know of these organs beyond
conjecture! Who shall say whether each or both may not possess a
sense of which we ourselves have no true perception? Close observers
are convinced that the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[121]</a></span> tongue of a snake is endowed with peculiar
sensibilities; and it is the more astonishing, therefore, that reason
and observation have so long been blinded and enslaved by prejudice
regarding it.</p>

<p>Some naturalists think that the sense of smell lies in antennæ. The
sense of smell itself is dull in snakes; yet they have means of
ascertaining what other animals learn by smell. Says Huxley, ‘The
great majority of the sensations we call taste are in reality complex
sensations, into which smell and even touch largely enter.’<a name="FNanchor_34_34" id="FNanchor_34_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> It is
certain that the snake’s tongue is in constant use for some purpose or
other, though beyond what we see of its form and actions we can only
speculate, or, at best, draw conclusions from observation.</p>

<p>Both Dumeril and Lenz give the result of their own observations. The
former, however, devotes so many pages to the tongue and its functions
under the various headings of ‘touch,’ ‘nutrition,’ ‘the senses,’ etc.,
that it will be necessary to curtail a good deal, particularly as this
great author has been quoted by those other physiologists whose words
were given above. Of the sheath into which the tongue is received he
says:&mdash;‘Une gaîne cylindrique, charnue; mais l’extrémité de cette
langue est fourchue, ou divisée en deux pointes mobiles, vibrantes,
susceptible de se mouvoir indépendamment l’une de l’autre, de s’écarter
et d’être lancées, pour ainsi dire: ce que la fait regarder par le
vulgaire comme une sorte de darte, auquel même quelques peintres ont
donné dans leurs tableaux la forme d’un fer de flêche. Le vrai est que
cette langue est molle, humide, très faible, et que l’on a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[122]</a></span> fait des
conjectures, plutôt sur les usages auquels on l’a cru destinée, que
sur l’utilité réelle dont elle peut être aux serpents dans l’acte de
la deglutition; car les serpents ne mâchent jamais leurs alimens.’<a name="FNanchor_35_35" id="FNanchor_35_35"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a>
‘Quoiqu’on ignore le véritable usage de la langue humide et charnue que
les serpents brandissent et font continuellement sortir de la bouche
et vibrer dans l’air, il est facile de concevoir qu’à cause de la
forme cylindrique et de son etroitesse elle ne pourrait faciliter la
mastication, quand même les dents seraient propres de cet usage.’<a name="FNanchor_36_36" id="FNanchor_36_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_36" class="fnanchor">[36]</a></p>

<p>This first volume of <i>Erpétologie générale</i> treats of all reptiles
inclusively; but in the sixth volume, where the <i>ophidia</i> particularly
are introduced, the tongue is, with the rest of the organs, more
minutely described. Some repetition necessarily occurs; but there is
still a good deal that will repay perusal.</p>

<p>After stating that in serpents the sense of touch is dull, on account
of the integument, and the absence of what may be regarded as tactile
organs, and that the sense of smell is dull, the nostrils being feebly
developed, Dumeril adds: ‘The tongue, though fleshy, very mobile, and
constantly moist, is rather an especial instrument for touch, for the
action of lapping, and for other functions, than to perceive the nature
of liquids;’ in other words, than as an organ of <i>taste</i>. ‘It is,
however, very remarkable; though smooth and even above, it is furnished
with little fringes or papillæ along the sides. Notwithstanding its
length and narrowness, it is singularly protractile and retractile; and
in its exceedingly rapid vibrations has impressed the vulgar with the
idea<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[123]</a></span> that it is formed with the two spear-like points. It is clothed
with a delicate skin.’<a name="FNanchor_37_37" id="FNanchor_37_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_37" class="fnanchor">[37]</a></p>

<p>Lenz made many interesting experiments. In his work he gives us the
result of these, and also what some other German ophiologists had seen
and done. He observed how entirely the snake trusted to its tongue
in any unusual circumstances; the all-important member was then in
ceaseless activity. Confined in a glass jar containing wine or any
liquid that the snake did not like, the tongue was ever agitated.
Crawling up the side, the tongue was in constant request to feel the
glass (as may be often seen at the Zoological Gardens); and on arriving
at the top, the head was turned this way and that, and then bent over
the edge, as if to make certain that no further obstacle existed; the
tongue not for one instant quiet, but exserted sometimes as far forward
as the whole length of the head, telling to its owner all that the
other senses could not discover.</p>

<p>Permitting it to touch his hand, he felt it like the sweep of a thread,
so light and delicate. Too fine and flexible to injure any surface, the
slightest touch of one or both the tips suffices for intelligence. Nay,
sometimes without even touching&mdash;that is, without positive contact, but
by some subtle sense, it seems to act as guide.</p>

<p>When the snake is excited by fear or alarm, or when in a strange place,
the activity of the tongue is so great, the vibrations are so rapid,
that the eye cannot follow them. It is like the play of electricity.</p>

<p>So far from participating in deglutition, the snake withdraws<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[124]</a></span> the
slender instrument into its sheath, which, while feeding, is safely
closed. For this highly-endowed organ is so guarded against injury,
that the reptile has not only a place of safety provided, but power
to close the mouth of its scabbard, lest dust or other irritating
particles should enter.</p>

<p>We have only to reflect upon and to observe the habits of snakes to
perceive the importance of their tongue to them. For the most part
nocturnal, winding their way under tangled masses of vegetation, often
in dark caves, holes, crevices, and obscure retreats, with their eyes
so placed that they can see neither before nor under them, and with
other senses only feebly developed, the tongue with its sensitive
papillæ feels its way, and conveys impressions to its owner.</p>

<p>Cats have their whiskers to help them in the dark; moles and mice have
their quick sense of smell to guide them; all nocturnal animals are
gifted in some manner or another, but snakes have only their tongue.</p>

<p>We can now imagine the helpless condition of the reptile if deprived of
the tongue! Rudolph Effeldt, of whom Lenz speaks as the ‘most eminent
observer of living snakes,’ found that when deprived of the tongue,
they would neither eat nor drink, and, of course, died after a while.
But Lenz had some snakes sent him which had been deprived of their
tongues, and he observed that though for a time dull and declining,
they did recover, and by and by ate as usual. From which we can only
conclude that snakes, like other animals, differ in their powers of
endurance. Some survive mutilation and suffering, some do not.</p>

<p>Another error in illustrations is to represent the tongue<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[125]</a></span> far extended
while the mouth is wide open. Snakes very rarely open their mouths and
use their tongues at the same time. Indeed, excepting to gape, the
snake does <i>not</i> generally open its mouth; nor invariably keep it open
while advancing on its prey, as illustrations often represent.</p>

<p>Nature has further provided for the safety of the tongue by leaving a
small opening in the upper lip, or at the point of the muzzle, just
where no teeth are in the way, so that the snake can use its tongue
without exposing the sheath and mouth to injury. This ‘chink in the
rostral shield,’ to use technical language, permits the free exit of
the tongue and the independent actions of the two muscles of which
it is formed, enabling the reptile to hold the two fine tips close
together as one tip, while passing the tongue through the narrow chink,
and to expand them afterwards.</p>

<p>Lenz never observed any dust or small particles adhering to the tongue;
but Mr. Arthur Nicols, the author of <i>Zoological Notes</i>, informs me
that he <i>has</i> noticed little fragments of rubbish cling to the tongue
and carried into the mouth. Dr. Cantor also says: ‘Sea snakes make no
use of the tongue while <i>in</i> the water, but considerable use of it as
a feeler when out of the water.’ He has noticed ‘several Indian land
snakes use it to bring into the mouth various small bodies, as stones,
sand, twigs, which they swallow to stimulate digestion.’</p>

<p>This is curious and noteworthy. The power or volition which can control
the sheath and close the valve can, no doubt, exclude these foreign
particles; as, while lapping, the mouth must be moistened as well as
the interior of the sheath, both it and the tongue requiring frequent
lubrication.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[126]</a></span></p>

<p>But we have now reached the confines of speculation. There is enough of
real fact about this ‘horrid forked tongue’ to interest and astonish
us. We find it guarded, aided, especially provided for, and especially
constructed and endowed; especially <i>harmless</i> also. To the owner its
importance ranks not second even to the eyes.</p>

<p>The importance of the antennæ to insects is evident to all who have
ever watched the play of those active and beautifully-elaborate organs,
their infinitely varying forms (often many times the length of the
insect itself), their ceaseless play and independent action. Constantly
waving, they lightly touch every contiguous object; investigating on
all sides, they convey to insect intelligence all it requires to know
regarding its environments. Like a herald or a scout, they literally
‘spy out the land,’ and thus become a guide and a guard to the tiny
feeble creature which possesses them. Through them the owner learns all
that is needful for its well-being.</p>

<p>Much as an insect uses these exquisitely-constructed antennæ, so does
a snake its long, slender, pliant, bifurcate, and highly-sensitive
tongue. Ever busy, ever vigilant, exploring while barely touching each
surface within reach, yet by night and by day conveying with that
slight contact all necessary information to its owner. Sent out with
the speed of a flash, it telegraphs back with like quickness the result
of its discoveries.</p>

<p>If we may assign intelligence to any single organ, we might affirm that
there is more of what we consider rational intelligence in the tongue
of a snake than in any other of its perceptive faculties. Probably the
most important<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[127]</a></span> knowledge demanded by the reptile is conveyed, or, at
least, confirmed by this organ.</p>

<p>‘<i>Colorée</i>,’ says Dumeril of the tongue, as botanists say of the part
of a plant ordinarily green, as, for instance, a calyx; ‘coloured,’ but
not what colour. This is precisely as we may describe the colour of a
snake’s tongue. My attention was first drawn to this on reading one of
Dr. Arthur Stradling’s communications to <i>Land and Water</i>, April 2,
1881. ‘It would be interesting to know why some snakes have red tongues
and others black,’ he writes. ‘Here beside me, in a glass case, are two
little snakes, both belonging to the same genus (<i>Tropidonotus</i>)&mdash;a
seven-banded (<i>T. leberis</i>), and a moccasin (<i>T. fasciatus</i>), both
hailing from the United States, and both alike in their habits and
choice of food; yet it is a case of <i>rouge et noir</i> with their lingual
appendages.’</p>

<p>After reading this, I noticed the varieties of colour in all the
‘forked tongues’ that exhibited themselves at the Zoological Gardens.
Black or very dark tongues, I think, predominate; and next to black,
brownish or olive tints, resembling those of the snake itself. But
not as a rule; for some very light snakes have dark tongues, and the
converse. In two small green tree snakes of distinct genera, one had
a pale pink or flesh-coloured tongue, and the other a black one. Some
tongues are almost white, while a few are red. There seems to be as
much caprice as in the colour of the human hair and eyes; and as
physiologists have traced some sort of connection or relationship with
complexions and constitutions in these, so ophiologists may, after a
time, discover a similar relation or sympathy between the colour of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[128]</a></span> a
snake’s tongue and its integument or eyes. At present, I have observed
only so far as that two entirely black and two entirely green snakes
may present four distinct colours as regards their four tongues, and
that many tints of brown, black, and pink may be seen in the tongues of
as many snakes.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-128.jpg" width="200" height="199"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[129]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-041.jpg" width="500" height="101"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER VIII.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE GLOTTIS.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap08">ONE Friday in august 1873, while watching a large python, at the
Zoological Gardens, swallowing a duck which it had just killed, I was
struck by a singular something projecting or hanging from the side of
the snake’s mouth. It looked like a kind of tube or pipe, about one
inch and a half or two inches of which were visible. The python had
rather an awkward hold of the duck, having begun at the breast with the
neck doubled back, the head forming some temporary impediment to the
progress of the jaws upon the prey. So the strange protuberance gave
one a ‘sort of turn,’ and a shudder. It looked as if it might be some
part of the crushed bird, and then again it had the appearance of some
internal arrangement; and another shudder crept over one as the idea
suggested itself that the poor snake had ruptured its throat in some
way. What <i>could</i> this queer thing be, hanging on one side, as you see
the tongue of a horse or dog sometimes lolling sideways over its lower
jaw? While intently pondering and observing this strange tube-like
object, in size somewhat as big as the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[130]</a></span> edge of a thimble, I saw the
end of it moving of itself, an orifice contracting and closing tight,
by the loose skin puckering up, so to speak. Presently it opened, and
by and by again closed tight, as you see the breathing orifice of the
octopus contract and expand, open and close, at regular intervals, only
in the present case the intervals were not regular. This strange tube,
then, had life and volition in it! What could it be?</p>

<p>Suddenly a certain day of one’s childhood flashed into my mind, and a
certain scene of home. One Michaelmas Day it was, when, having stolen
surreptitiously into the kitchen to coax the cook to ‘<i>let</i> me see
the goose!’ I found her busy preparing the bird, and clambered into a
chair to watch her. ‘What’s <i>that</i>?’ I demanded, seeing part of a long,
pipe-like looking thing lying there.</p>

<p>‘Oh, that’s the windpipe. That’s like what <i>you’ve</i> got in <i>your</i>
throat; and that’s where the crumbs get to make you choke so,’ in
allusion to a recent occurrence.</p>

<p>I gazed with awe and interest at that very strange thing, and wondered
if it really could be like anything in my own throat, and where it
began and ended, and so on. And that goose’s windpipe was indelibly
stamped on my memory.</p>

<p>And now that scene came vividly back to me, for there was a windpipe
sort of look about this appendage to the snake’s jaw, only it did not
appear to be bruised or injured in any way. Nor from the position of
the duck (by this time half swallowed) could it belong to the bird.
And, again, it moved with an independent motion!</p>

<p>And now the snake threw up its head, to free the legs of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[131]</a></span> the duck from
its folds where it had been held, and as you see horses toss up their
heads to get the grain in the bag hung on their noses, and I saw the
tube-like object still more plainly. Then, with a strange, awe-struck
feeling, came a conviction that this could be nothing less than the
poor snake’s windpipe, and that something must be very wrong with it.</p>

<p>I beckoned to the keeper, and pointed to it, telling him, ‘I do think
that must be its windpipe. Is it hurt?’</p>

<p>The keeper said, ‘No, the snake was not hurt. That he had often seen
it like that when the snakes were feeding; and that he also thought it
must be the windpipe, to enable the snake to breathe while feeding.’</p>

<p>Next day, with eager steps and excited curiosity, I hurried to the
British Museum reading-room, thinking I had made a wonderful discovery,
for I had never heard this strange phenomenon alluded to, and the
keeper evidently knew very little about it.</p>

<p>With this great secret on my mind, I flew to the well-known shelves, to
secure those books which would certainly enlighten me if information
were to be had. Alas! for my wonderful discovery, though it really had
been a portion of the windpipe which was thus extended from the mouth,
it was what had been known long ago by those physiologists who had
studied the anatomy of the ophidia, and it was as coolly described as
if it were the commonest occurrence in the world for creatures to do
what they pleased with their windpipe!</p>

<p>Says Professor Owen in his <i>Anatomy of the Vertebrates</i>, vol. i. p.
525: ‘The glottis of serpents can be drawn forward<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[132]</a></span> and protruded
from the mouth by the action of’ (certain surrounding) ‘muscles. In
marine serpents the glottis is situated very near the fore part of the
mouth, and the air can be inspired at the surface of the water without
exposure of the jaws.’</p>

<p>The lungs of snakes, then, are supplied with air through that moveable
tube, and the ‘glottis,’ which is the mouth or opening of what may here
be called the air-tube, not to venture on scientific terms, was what I
had seen ‘puckered up,’ as it appeared.</p>

<p>We may briefly remind the reader that our own throats contain two
passages, one to the lungs, the other to the stomach; and in order that
the air passage may be safely guarded from the entrance of any foreign
particles, there are various parts, valves, and muscles which come
into play with the action of swallowing, each and all having technical
names, larynx, pharynx, glottis, epiglottis, etc., which need not be
here described. But in the adaptive development of those wonderful
creatures, snakes, the entrance or mouth of the windpipe&mdash;which begins
<i>in</i> their mouth&mdash;can not only be closed at will, but still further to
protect the passage, and also to enable the reptiles to breathe during
the long process of swallowing, they can absolutely bring the apparatus
forward, even <i>beyond</i> their mouths; and this was what had so surprised
me on witnessing it.</p>

<p>The glottis, being the soft, membranous end or aperture, was what
opened and closed, expanded and contracted, by that sort of puckering
up and loosening again that was observable, and which here was rounded,
but in the higher animals is a narrow, lip-like slit.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">[133]</a></span></p>

<p>Some physiologists, in describing this ‘air-tube’ of serpents, speak
of it as the <i>larynx</i>, which is what we unscientific folk would call
the entrance to, or the upper portion of, the true windpipe or trachea.
Others, again, affirm that they saw the ‘windpipe’ projecting. After
all, much less has been said about it than one could wish; and what
is said is somewhat conflicting, perhaps on account of the obscurity
connected with this surprising adaptation of means to necessities.
A thorough examination of the position of the trachea of snakes
<i>while feeding</i>, and a perfect realization of its functions, could
only be obtained were it possible to arrest the process of feeding
by the instantaneous death of the feeder, and while every muscle of
the snake’s mouth remained in position. Even then, one could not be
positive, as snakes are endowed with the astonishing power of carrying
out their intentions, or, in common language, ‘going on with their
business,’ even after death. That is to say, owing to the irritability
of their muscles, the action which they were about to perform (as,
for instance, springing at a foe) continues should the head be shot
off at the moment of making the attempt. In p. 56 and chap. xxi. some
remarkable elucidations of this are given.</p>

<p>The general appearance of a windpipe is familiar to every one. It
is formed of a series of rings or hoops, partially cartilaginous in
mammals; that is to say, they are incomplete behind, where their
ends are united by muscle and membrane, and come in contact with the
gullet; but in serpents the rings are entire, the ends of each being
joined together by an elastic substance. The rings themselves are
also connected with each other by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[134]</a></span> elastic membranes, so that the
windpipe is capable of being extended like an india-rubber tube, and of
regaining its former position.</p>

<p>The length of it naturally varies according to the size and species
of serpent; but as a rule it is always much longer comparatively than
in man. In a full-sized rattlesnake, the trachea is about twenty
inches long. In a boa constrictor, also, though a much larger snake,
it measures about the same. In smaller snakes it is, of course, much
shorter; but there is the same singular diversity in this as we find in
other serpent anomalies, viz. a great variation in the length in snakes
of equal size, and without any very apparent reason.</p>

<p>Bingley, in his <i>Animal Biography</i>, 1820, describes the appearance of
a large snake (M’Leod’s celebrated boa) when gorging a goat; but the
account, like those of that time, is more sensational than scientific.
‘His cheeks were immensely dilated, and appeared to be bursting, and
his <i>windpipe</i> projected three inches beyond his jaws.’</p>

<p>Broderip, a few years later, 1825, more lucidly and dispassionately
describes what he had observed. ‘I have uniformly found that the larynx
is, during the operation of swallowing, protruded sometimes as much as
a quarter of an inch beyond the edge of the dilated lower jaw. I have
seen, in company with others, the valves of the glottis open and shut,
and the dead rabbit’s fur immediately before the aperture stirred,
apparently by the serpent’s breath, when his jaws and throat were
stiff, and stretched to excess’ (<i>Zoological Journal</i>, ii. 1826). This
account is quoted from the paper entitled, ‘Some Account of the Mode in
which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">[135]</a></span> the Boa Constrictor takes its Prey, and of the Adaptation of its
Organization to its Habits,’ by W. J. Broderip, Esq., F.L.S. The paper
was written as a criticism of the M’Leod story.</p>

<p>I, also, on several occasions, saw the fur or feathers stirred by
air when the mouth or valve opened of what we may safely call the
<i>air-tube</i>, whether larynx or trachea.</p>

<p>Though so rarely mentioned in popular books on snakes, this
surprising modification of the breathing apparatus was described by
the indefatigable Dr. Edward Tyson, on his dissection of the first
rattlesnake that fell into the hands of the Royal Society, 1683, and
whose paper on the <i>Vipera caudisona</i>, as he named it, is quoted in
chapters xvi. and xx. ‘Over the tongue did lye the <i>larynx</i>, not formed
with that variety of cartilages as is usual in other animals, but so as
to make a rime or slit for receiving or conveying out the air. Nor was
there any epiglottis for preventing other bodies from slipping in, this
being sufficiently provided for by the strict closure of it.’<a name="FNanchor_38_38" id="FNanchor_38_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_38" class="fnanchor">[38]</a></p>

<p>Dr. Tyson examined only a dead specimen, and could not therefore
witness the action observable in life; but his remarkable accuracy in
describing the parts will be evident in comparing what he said with
Dumeril, who did observe the living reptiles. The confusion which
sometimes occurs in distinguishing the parts may be also explained by
the less complicated structure of the tube, which in higher animals
presents the nicer distinctions of the parts, glottis, epiglottis,
larynx, etc.</p>

<p>‘Il n’y a pas de véritable larynx, une petite languette<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[136]</a></span> mobile qui
s’ajuste, sur l’ouverture linéaire; c’est la glotte.... La glotte,
située au-dessous de la victime, se porte en avant, et l’acte de
respiration ne se trouve point empêché. C’est que nous avons indiqué à
l’article de la déglutition; car on voit distinctement alors la glotte
se fermer et se délater.’<a name="FNanchor_39_39" id="FNanchor_39_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_39" class="fnanchor">[39]</a></p>

<p>This <i>petite languette</i> became a new object of curiosity, and soon
came fresh opportunities for observation, namely, when some of the
larger snakes were engaged in yawning. On account of its extreme
mobility, you do not always detect the form of this little point on
the upper lip, which as often as not presents a rounded opening; but
occasionally the little tongue&mdash;which can be nothing but an apology for
an epiglottis&mdash;is very distinct, and may be compared with the moveable,
pointed snout of some of the large pachyderms, or, still better, with
an exactly similar formation at the end of the elephant’s trunk, and
which, though for a different purpose, moves similarly.</p>

<p>As to the <i>exact position</i> of this glottis when at rest, a word or two
must be said; for a number of prepositions have been used to describe
it. One writer says ‘beneath’ the tongue sheath, others say ‘beyond,’
others again ‘before;’ ‘over,’ ‘above,’ ‘behind,’ ‘in front of,’ have
been variously used, and all depending on which way the snake is
viewed; but without drawing upon half a score of prepositions to puzzle
the reader, as I myself was sorely puzzled until a yawning snake was so
kind as to afford me an ocular scrutiny of its lingual arrangements, we
can easily comprehend where a passage to the windpipe and lungs must
necessarily be, and which, it is clear, is not <i>under</i> the tongue.
When a snake’s<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[137]</a></span> head is raised, as in crawling up a wall or a tree,
the glottis may be said to be ‘beneath’ or ‘under;’ but the general
position of a snake being horizontal, the mouth then opened would show
you the opening of the tongue sheath <i>nearest</i> to you and to the front;
and beyond that, behind, over, or <i>upon</i> the tongue sheath, is another
aperture, which is the glottis or entrance to the larynx and trachea or
windpipe.</p>

<p>So there are in fact two sheaths or tubes lying one upon the other,
viz. the tongue sheath, and upon this and parallel with it, the
windpipe.</p>

<p>After becoming better acquainted with the nature of that tube which
had impressed me so strangely, I lost no opportunity of making further
observations, and on the following feeding day at the Gardens I saw the
air-tubes of several snakes plainly. In September of that year, a new
‘Horseshoe’ snake (<i>Zamenis hippocrepis</i>) arrived from Morocco. It was
a small and very pretty snake, and while enjoying the privilege of a
private inspection, the keeper got its mouth open for me, enabling me
to see the glottis, as well as to both see and <i>feel</i> the four upper
rows of its beautiful little teeth, closely placed, and as sharp as
the finest pins. But the action of the air-tube was very distinct.
Probably little <i>Zamenis</i> was breathing harder and nervously under the
detention, but no word better describes the formation of the aperture
of the perfectly rounded tube, and the movement of it, than the <i>petite
languette</i>.</p>

<p>Subsequently, there were opportunities of observing the air-tube in
two of the large African vipers, the ‘River Jack’ or ‘Nose-horned’
vipers (<i>Vipera rhinosceros</i>) occupying the same cage. Each struck a
guinea-pig and held it. One of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[138]</a></span> them began to eat his before it was
quite dead, and had finished it before his friend had begun. In his
case, the air-pipe was at the side of his distended jaws. In the other,
it projected more than half an inch <i>beneath</i>, nearly in the centre.</p>

<p>This happened on a mild, damp day in November 1873, and after that
I saw the tube in ‘several snakes,’ but I regret the names were not
entered in my notebook at the time. In the smaller non-venomous snakes,
or in the lacertines&mdash;of which there were then a large number&mdash;I do
not remember to have observed it. They despatch their frog or mouse so
quickly that they would scarcely need a fresh supply of air meanwhile.
In the larger vipers, rattlesnakes, and constrictors, the air-tube
was undoubtedly witnessed. Winter then terminated my observations,
and afterwards a prolonged absence from town. Unfortunately, when
observations were about to be resumed, the change of the plans at
the Zoological Gardens, and the exclusion of the public, defeated my
intentions, though on one occasion I did see the windpipe of little
<i>Natrix torquata</i> very distinctly; and this was the smallest snake in
which I had ever observed it. <i>Natrix</i> had nearly disposed of a large
frog. The whole of it was in his mouth, which was widely expanded,
and the air-tube was protruded sideways, not <i>out</i> of the mouth, but
sufficiently forward to enable one to distinguish its form, and the
action of the <i>petite languette</i>. The prey being unusually large, the
snake had needed air while swallowing it.</p>

<p>On several occasions in snakes recently dead, and of various sizes, one
has been able to notice how admirably this tube, which lies along the
mouth like a soft cushion,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">[139]</a></span> somewhat in the form of a parrot’s tongue,
is supplied with space in the roof, arched to fit it, the palate teeth
enclosing it on each side, while the opening, or glottis, exactly meets
the nostrils, <i>les arrières nez</i>, bringing it into communication with
the outer air.</p>

<p>In a little <i>Coluber</i>, just dead, I again had an opportunity of making
observations. The membranous coating was so thin and transparent that
the rings of the windpipe could be very distinctly traced from a quite
forward position in the mouth, and beginning on and over the tongue
sheath. The surrounding skin or membrane was also loose and abundant,
so that with the point of a needle the upper part of the windpipe could
be easily drawn forward <i>beyond</i> the lips. In life the little snake
could thus have voluntarily protruded it as occasion required.</p>

<p>Another day the large reticulated python seemed to intentionally
gratify my curiosity by affording me a most leisurely and excellent
opportunity for observation. His head was raised, and so close to the
glass that the process of swallowing could be watched conveniently.
The final swallow, or successive efforts at the last were, as usual,
attended with frequent yawns. The glottis, as could on these occasions
be distinctly seen, was repeatedly opened and closed, and after being
extended beyond the mouth, it gradually resumed its natural position.
While the prey occupied the entire space between the gaping jaws, one
could see the air-tube pushed forward <i>beneath</i>; but as by degrees
the duck disappeared down the throat, the interior of the mouth could
be better and better observed. In this large snake the membrane or
skin was too thick to enable<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">[140]</a></span> one to discern rings as in the little
<i>Coluber</i>; but as the larynx is merely the upper part of the trachea,
and as the glottis is the mere membranous opening to the larynx, it
seems evident that the windpipe itself is also extensible, the windpipe
being, indeed, the only portion of the air-tube sufficiently firm and
resisting to aid the purpose of respiration under such conditions.</p>

<p>The exact distance which the tube is extended cannot be accurately
stated. It would not be equally protruded in snakes of different sizes
nor under different conditions. Broderip saw it ‘as much as a quarter
of an inch.’ Bingley, an earlier and a less safe authority, says ‘the
windpipe projected <i>three inches</i> beyond his jaws.’ The keeper at the
Gardens thought he had sometimes seen it ‘as much as two inches in the
largest snakes;’ and my own impression was, one inch, at least, in the
python, and almost that in the large vipers.</p>

<p>It is undoubtedly one of those interesting features worthy of further
investigation, and one is surprised that more accurate information
regarding it has not appeared in our later encyclopedias and in the
‘Proceedings of the Zoological Societies.’</p>

<p>So long ago as 1826, it was observed and confirmed by the distinguished
author of <i>Zoological Researches</i>, and <i>Leaves from the Notebook of
a Naturalist</i>. The author of <i>British Reptiles</i>, who conducted the
<i>Zoological Journal</i> when Mr. Broderip contributed the valuable paper
above quoted, added a note by special request, stating that his own
‘not unfrequent observations have on every point been completely
confirmatory of those above recorded’ by W. J. Broderip, Esq.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">[141]</a></span></p>

<p>A very good account of the whole is quoted in the <i>Penny Magazine</i>,
1836, and we are therein further enlightened by reading that Joseph
Henry Green, Esq., F.R.S., in one of his lectures at the Royal College
of Surgeons, alluded to Broderip’s paper ‘On the Mode in which
Constrictors swallow their Prey,’ and which had drawn his attention to
the statement about the larynx, and led him to examine the mouth of a
snake.</p>

<p>In process of dissection, he detected two muscles in the lower jaw,
evidently intended for the purpose of bringing the larynx forward; how
far forward and how much of the true windpipe was also brought forward,
he did not say. But this in a dead specimen could scarcely be affirmed
with certainty.</p>

<p>From the large size of their prey, and the jaws being stretched
open and gorged to their utmost capacity, it is plain that snakes
cannot breathe freely in the ordinary manner while feeding, a process
sometimes of an hour or more. Owing to the construction of their lungs
and their capability to contain a large volume of air, they do not
require to breathe frequently; still they do occasionally take a fresh
inspiration, and their needs are met by this wonderful arrangement of
the breathing apparatus.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-141.jpg" width="200" height="61"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">[142]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-059.jpg" width="500" height="110"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER IX.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>BREATHING AND HISSING OF SNAKES.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap06">FOLLOWING on the subject of the last chapter comes that of respiration;
and in connection with breathing is the ‘voice,’ so far as this class
of animals can be said to possess a voice.</p>

<p>As already seen in the description of the glottis, serpents do not
breathe in the ordinary way, with short and regular inspirations, but
when they do respire, they take in a supply of air to last them for
some time. Their lungs, instead of occupying one particular portion of
the body corresponding with the chest of the higher animals, are less
developed. One lung&mdash;or what Professor Owen calls the long pulmonary
bag&mdash;of snakes extends along more than half of their body; in some
species nearly to the anus. Only one lung is normal, the other is
rudimentary. The circulation is so arranged that on each contraction
of the heart only a part of the blood is exposed to the influence of
the air and becomes oxygenated, the rest returning to the parts without
having undergone the action of respiration at all. The blood is, in
consequence, poor in red corpuscles, its circulation<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">[143]</a></span> is comparatively
languid, the reptile becomes easily torpid, and its temperature is
influenced by the surrounding atmosphere more than by the vigour of its
own functions. This is why, when not excited to activity by external
warmth, reptiles can pass a long time without food. Having no fixed
temperature to maintain, one important source of demand for food is
withdrawn.</p>

<p>The air enters their lungs chiefly in a direct course from the
nostrils, only by the mouth when open. If you observe the flatness of
the head, and the very short space that can exist between the nose and
the mouth of snakes, you will readily trace the communication between
the entrance to the trachea and the outer air through the nostrils
when the glottis is not closed. Professor Owen, in his <i>Anatomy of
the Vertebrates</i>, vol. i. p. 528, describes this process fully. In
the foregoing description I have borrowed from him, as well as from
Dr. Carpenter, Todd, and others; but as there is nothing like ‘seeing
for oneself,’ I would persuade my readers to watch a snake for a few
minutes. An inspiration at intervals will be easily discerned by the
expansion of the body. You will also perceive partial or slighter
breathings, and the trunk dilating and expanding gently through a sort
of internal respiration which is going on; every now and then comes the
deeper, fuller breath.</p>

<p>You may perceive that sometimes one short portion of the body expands,
as if the lung in that part only were at work. This is more easily seen
in the larger snakes. I have watched these for a quarter of an hour or
more at a time, during which period only a comparatively short portion
of the body showed any signs of breathing.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">[144]</a></span> Schlegel, who carefully
studied this action, observed sometimes as many as thirty such partial
dilatations of the trunk and lung between two full inspirations.</p>

<p>In the large reticulated python I once saw that about two feet of the
body, viz. four to six feet from the head, dilated with occasional and
irregular inspirations, and no other part. By and by slight indications
of breathing were observable much lower down, many feet apart from
the previous action, while during the whole time I was watching I saw
not one full and entire inflation of the lungs. This was on a rather
chilly September afternoon, and the python had partaken of a couple of
ducks for dinner the previous day, and it was a time when inactivity is
usual. In a rattlesnake, on the same day, similar partial and irregular
respirations were observable, this serpent having caused four rats to
disappear at his last night’s supper.</p>

<p>Sometimes you can discern no indication whatever of breathing for a
very long time. When the reptiles are not in health, when they are
about to cast their skin, or when in a half-torpid condition, you may
observe this.</p>

<p>When a snake yawns&mdash;a long and leisurely proceeding&mdash;the lungs are
doubtless greatly refreshed; otherwise these reptiles do not rest with
their mouths open, and the only possible access of outer air by the
lips being through the chink appropriated to the service of the tongue
(and which is as exactly opposite the opening of the tongue-sheath as
the nostrils are opposite to the glottis), they must breathe almost
entirely through the nose, <i>except when yawning</i>.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">[145]</a></span></p>

<p>From the elongated form of the pulmonary bag, and the large volume
of air which it contains, we can understand not only how a temporary
suspension of respiration can be supported, but we comprehend how it is
that these reptiles can remain under water for long periods, as they
often do,&mdash;not because they breathe <i>in</i> the water, but because they
can for a while do without breathing.</p>

<p>Snakes have been seen to remain perfectly quiet at the bottom of a
clear stream for half an hour or more. Sometimes in this totally
quiescent state one has been supposed to be dead, until, on a stone
being thrown, it has darted away like a fish. None of the aquatic birds
or the cetaceous mammalia can remain so long under water without coming
to the surface to breathe as serpents can.</p>

<p>At the Zoological Gardens they remain for hours at a time in their
tanks. Often you will see a head peeping out&mdash;which, unfortunately, is
all we <i>can</i> see&mdash;while the bath is being enjoyed, but as often the
head is also immersed, though, of course, for a shorter interval, the
snake lifting it to breathe occasionally.</p>

<p>We can imagine also the great assistance in swimming which this long
air-receptacle must be, these reptiles deriving from it the same
advantage, says Professor Owen, ‘as an eel from its swim-bladder.’ In
chap. XII. is described the almost swimming motion of the more active
snakes when gliding through long grass, or effecting progress over
a very smooth surface. In the water the action is similar&mdash;that is,
the progression is by lateral undulations, the tail being the chief
propelling power. Whether through the resisting medium of water, or
beating the air, so to speak,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">[146]</a></span> when skimming over smooth or unresisting
surfaces, this swimming motion is ever easy and graceful. In the
chapter on Tails, we shall see what an important agent in progression
is this limb, whether by pressure, as in the burrowing snakes, or by
its oar-like or paddle-like use in rapid motion.</p>

<p>To recapitulate the above in a few words&mdash;first, respiration warms the
blood; snakes are cold-blooded because only a portion of the blood
passes through the lungs to become oxygenated, and in proportion to the
diminution of the quantity of blood transmitted to the lungs, so does
respiration become weaker; therefore reptiles are less dependent on
breathing.</p>

<p>Regarding the ‘voice’ of serpents, so surprising are the qualities
attributed to it, that one would imagine the existence of varieties of
snakes of widely differing organizations, if we were to believe all we
read of the sounds they produce. ‘Hissing loudly,’ or ‘whistling,’ is
the rule. No ordinary writer or traveller who says a word about a snake
ever heard it hiss anything but ‘loudly,’ a statement traceable to
the same sentiment which causes persons to talk of the ‘horrid forked
tongue.’ A benevolently-disposed snake who would warn you away with
that terrible tongue would also strengthen his argument by a prolonged
hiss, and the louder the better.</p>

<p>But let us turn to the hard, cold, unpoetical, unimaginative language
of science, and see what a snake can really do in the vocal expression
of its feelings.</p>

<p>Says Dr. Carpenter: ‘In all air-breathing vertebrata the production
of sound depends upon the passage of air through<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">[147]</a></span> a certain portion
of the respiratory tube, which is so constructed as to set the air
in vibration. In reptiles and mammals it is at the point where the
windpipe opens into the front of the pharynx, that this vibrating
apparatus is situated. Few of the animals of the former class, however,
can produce any other sound than a <i>hiss</i>, occasioned by the passage of
air through the narrow chink by which the trachea communicates with the
pharynx; but this sound, owing to the great capacity of their lungs, is
often very much prolonged’ (<i>Animal Physiology</i>),&mdash;prolonged, but not
powerful, be it observed.</p>

<p>Says Professor Owen: ‘The true “<i>chordæ vocales</i>” are absent in
serpents, and the voice is reduced to a hissing sound, produced by the
action of the expired air upon the margins of the glottis’ (<i>Anatomy of
the Vertebrates</i>).</p>

<p>Speaking of the escape of air from the lungs, Dumeril says: ‘Lorsqu’il
est passé plus vivement il laisse entendre une sorte de vibration, qui
le plus souvent, ne consiste que dans le bruit d’un soufflement.’<a name="FNanchor_40_40" id="FNanchor_40_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_40" class="fnanchor">[40]</a></p>

<p>Sometimes, according to the position of a snake, or when the passage is
well open and uninterrupted, the hiss partakes somewhat of a whistling
sound, like the blowing through a quill. I observed this particularly
in a ‘tree boa’ (<i>Epicratis cenchris</i>), which hissed at me angrily one
day because I took the liberty of touching it when the keeper opened
its cage to arrange its blanket. The ‘hiss,’ not loud, or by any means
musical, differed from the ordinary blowing only as a current of
air passing through a round tube would differ from the same current
passing<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">[148]</a></span> through a narrow slit. A true ‘hiss,’ such as we produce
with closed teeth in prolonging the sound of <i>s</i>, a serpent can never
express. The nearest approach to it in the human voice is when the
tongue is in the position as if we are about to say <i>ye</i> or <i>he</i>, and
then prolong the breath; that is to say, breathe out while the tongue
is so placed before the word is uttered.</p>

<p>Naturally the larger the snake the stronger the ‘hiss;’ the more rapid
the expiration, the more powerful will be the volume of air with its
attendant <i>soufflement</i>.</p>

<p>The sound and action, as well as degree, are easily seen in the ‘puff
adder’ (<i>Clotho</i>, or <i>Vipera arietans</i>). When angry or alarmed, it
draws in a full breath, and its body swells perceptibly; then you hear
the escaping air like a prolonged sigh or blowing till the lungs are
empty. This process is repeated as long as the provocation lasts.</p>

<p>These alternate inspirations and expirations, with their accompanying
movements, the swelling and then diminishing of the trunk and the
regular <i>soufflants</i>, are so precisely like those of a pair of bellows,
that excepting in shape, we require no more complete comparison. The
<i>degree</i> or strength of hiss is in this reptile very perceptible. When
recently imported and easily excited, its violent ‘puffing’ corresponds
with a very large pair of bellows; but in time it grows less alarmed
at the appearance of the human beings who unceremoniously stare at it;
and at length the puffing is very slight, ceasing altogether after
the snake becomes accustomed to its surroundings. But if molested and
alarmed, you then see the full play of the lungs, and the whole body
alternately expanding and contracting as before.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">[149]</a></span></p>

<p>We may almost compare this pulmonary action to the panting or full
breathings of ourselves under alarm or agitation. Only, in comparison
as the lung of snakes is elongated, and there is so much of it to fill
with air, so is the sound prolonged, and the breathing a slower process.</p>

<p>There is another viper, the small Cape adder (<i>Vipera atropos</i>), a most
deadly little reptile, in which a similar sound to that of the ‘puff
adder’ may be heard. When this creature is disturbed, it draws in a
long breath which expands its whole body in the same manner, and then
in expelling the air, a long sort of wheeze or blowing is audible.
Even in drawing the breath in, a slight sound is heard (as it also is
in our native viper and some others); but instead of the prolonged
hiss by which most snakes display their agitation, this little adder
expresses itself in long successive blowings, like its larger relative
<i>arietans</i>, only a little less regularly. In the present instance, I
saw the lung inflated with an agitated undulating motion, as if the
fluid air were entering in little waves. I do not state positively that
this is invariably the case from having witnessed it in one specimen.
This might be the normal process, or this viper’s lungs and health may
have been impaired. I am thus precise because it is unsafe to establish
as an invariable fact in natural history what may have been seen only
occasionally, a habit which has so often led to the promulgation of
erroneous impressions.</p>

<p>The prolonged sound of the hiss in snakes is due to the size of the
lung, they having a large supply of air to draw upon. Some serpents
expand their bodies under excitement without any perceptible hiss:
the cobra both hisses and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">[150]</a></span> expands, so do some others; but all these
movements are, no doubt, connected with respiration in some way, just
as in human beings, sighing, sobbing, panting, etc., in which the
ribs take part, are only modifications of the ordinary movements of
respiration, and chiefly emotional.</p>

<p>Very similar also to the manner of the puff adder is that of <i>Vipera
rhinosceros</i>, one of the largest African poisonous serpents, known as
the ‘River Jack,’ being fond of water. One of these was in the London
collection for several years, and I observed that whenever disturbed,
its body swelled considerably, while the ‘hissing,’ or expulsion of
breath, alternated with this expansion.</p>

<p>Snakes, like other animals, probably differ in temper or in
nervousness; for while some are noted hissers, others hiss only on
great provocation, and others, again, not at all. One remarkable
example of a non-hissing snake, though from no amiability of temper,
is the little carpet viper of India (<i>Echis carinata</i>). Unless you
were positively assured by learned authorities that this exceedingly
irritable little viper never hisses, you would scarcely believe your
ears, so sibilant is the sound it causes by rustling its scales
together.</p>

<p>Sir Joseph Fayrer, in the <i>Thanatophidia</i>, describes this as a very
fierce and aggressive little viper, always ready to attack and be on
the defensive. It throws itself into a double coil, and its agitated
motion causes the rough, carinated scales to rub against each other,
and make a sound like hissing, but ‘<i>it does not hiss</i>.’</p>

<p>This rustling is very much like the sound of the crotalus rattle, and
the dry scales must be raised in a sort of way, or<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">[151]</a></span> ruffled, as an
alarmed hen ruffles her feathers. ‘The outer scales are prominent,
and at a different angle to the rest,’ says Fayrer. It generally lies
coiled in a compact form, often like a ‘w,’ as may be seen in the
frontispiece, with its head in the centre, but always towards the point
of supposed danger, which in a cage is facing the spectator.</p>

<p>Curious and wonderful is the agitation into which this carpet snake
throws itself when disturbed, every inch of it, excepting the head, in
motion. The head retains its fixed position, the eyes intently keeping
guard, while the body moves in every conceivable curve, like wheels
within wheels, yet retaining the same outline, or occupying the same
place and space, though every muscle must be in activity.</p>

<p>One can liken this behaviour only to what is seen in the blending
of liquids of different densities. As you look down into a glass
containing one fluid while drop after drop of another is falling, you
perceive fresh currents and curves in every direction. Watching one
of these, it has changed places with another, you lose trace of it,
each drop is lost in the commingling of the whole. So it is with this
wonderful little echis. It is almost impossible to follow with the eye
any one portion or coil of its moving length; but each inch changes
places and mingles with the rest, like blending fluids.</p>

<p>Speaking of an American snake (<i>Pituophis melanoleucus</i>), in which a
similar excitement is observable, Mr. Samuel Lockwood<a name="FNanchor_41_41" id="FNanchor_41_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_41" class="fnanchor">[41]</a> likens it
to a ‘mystic wheel.’ ‘The movement consists of numberless units of
individual activities,’ he says, ‘and all regulated by and under the
perfect control of one<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">[152]</a></span> will that is felt in every curved line.’ There
is some likeness to the ‘thousand personal activities of a regiment of
soldiers on their winding way.’ He has watched the creature ‘melting
into movements so intricate and delicate that the lithe and limbless
thing looks like gossamer incarnate.’</p>

<p>This Pine snake is very smooth, and in the excited actions thus
graphically described, it makes no noise like the little Indian viper;
but Mr. Lockwood’s words are so appropriate to both snakes that
the reader has only to add in imagination the rustling noise that
accompanies the quivering echis.</p>

<p>Among other of the ophidians remarkable for their hissing is <i>Psamophis
sibilans</i>, the ‘hissing sand snake,’ a very slender little creature.
Several mentioned by the earlier naturalists as ‘the hissing snake,’
are evidently <i>Heterodons</i>. Catesby, Lawson, and others mention one as
the ‘blowing viper;’ <i>Blauser</i> of the Dutch, also the ‘chequered’ or
‘spreading-adder,’ which leaves no difficulty in identifying <i>Heterodon
platyrhinos</i>. An American writer indulges in a figure of speech while
describing this little Coluber by saying, ‘It emits a succession
of hisses, “sibilant sounds,” similar to letting off steam from a
small steam engine.’ He at the same time admits that it is harmless
and inoffensive in spite of its threatening aspect when flattening
its head.’ This is the ‘spread head’ alluded to in chap. xxii., an
unfortunate demonstration of alarm which has gained for it its venomous
titles. Several of this species have from time to time been added to
the collection at the Zoological Gardens, and the chief drawback to
their anticipated attractions is that they so soon become tame and
peaceful that you can scarcely provoke them to exhibit their reputed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">[153]</a></span>
power. I have seen one flatten its head so slightly as to be barely
noticeable, but I never heard it ‘hiss.’</p>

<p>‘Its spots become visibly brighter through rage,’ wrote Carver in 1796,
‘and at the same time it blows from its mouth with great force a subtle
wind that is reported to be of a nauseous smell.’ Chateaubriand, of
course, had something to say of ‘the hissing snake,’ frequent in the
warmer States of America. ‘When approached it becomes flat, appears
of different colours, and opens its mouth hissing. Great caution is
necessary not to enter the atmosphere which surrounds it. It decomposes
the air, which, imprudently inhaled, induces languor. The person wastes
away, the lungs are affected, and in the course of four months he dies
of consumption!’ Of another snake this author says, ‘He hisses like a
mountain eagle, he bellows like a bull!’</p>

<p>It may be objected, ‘Why occupy space by quoting such old wives’
fables?’ I reply, because they have already been so abundantly quoted;
and to such fables are in great part due the erroneous impressions
which exist to the present day. Several members of the <i>Heterodon</i>
family have from time to time been in our London collection. Friends
of mine have had <i>Heterodons</i> in their keeping as pets; I have often
handled them, and found them gentle and inoffensive in every way. They
are indeed so popularly and peculiarly interesting that they will claim
a page presently, the present chapter being devoted exclusively to
ophidian lungs, not human lungs, supposed to be destroyed by them!</p>

<p>While admitting various degrees and qualities of hissing,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">[154]</a></span> we may give
a passing mention to Du Chaillu’s snakes, all of which appear to be of
the whistling, as well as of the ‘springing’ kind. He saw ‘an enormous
black shining snake, loathsome and horrid.’ ... ‘Then the fellow gave a
spring, and whistled in a most horrid manner.’ And when he was wounded,
he again ‘gave a sharp whistle.’ On another occasion, while a Goree man
was playing with a large Naja, ‘the air around seemed to be filled with
the whistling sound of the creature,’ and so on.</p>

<p>Another African snake, the ‘Green Mamba,’ has such very bad manners
that it not only hisses, but spits and darts at you. In this instance
my informant was a young lady, who had ‘seen it!’</p>

<p>Somewhat more perplexing, because more deserving of notice, is what
Livingstone tells us of a serpent called <i>Nega-put-sane</i>, or ‘serpent
of a kid,’ which ‘utters a cry by night exactly like the bleating of
that animal,’ and that he had ‘heard one at a spot where no kid could
possibly have been.’<a name="FNanchor_42_42" id="FNanchor_42_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_42" class="fnanchor">[42]</a></p>

<p>‘<i>Il canta como un gallo</i>,’ said Albert Seba of an astonishing snake in
Hayti and St. Domingo once.</p>

<p>‘Beyond a hissing and often a peculiar drumming noise, snakes emit
no sound,’ says Krefft, one of our very able authorities.<a name="FNanchor_43_43" id="FNanchor_43_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_43" class="fnanchor">[43]</a> This
experienced writer does not positively affirm that the ‘drumming’
is produced by the voice, and it is more likely to proceed from
the beating of an agitated tail, an action which may be frequently
witnessed in excited snakes.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">[155]</a></span></p>

<p>Dr. Otto Wucherer saw this in a South American snake, <i>Xenodon
colubrinus</i>. ‘It has the habit of striking the ground rapidly with the
tail when irritated’ (<i>Zoo. Soc. Proc.</i> 1861).</p>

<p>So do <i>Spilotes variabilis</i>, and some others. So also does the Pine
snake, whose tail ends in a horny tip, ‘like a four-sided spike,’ and
which vibrates like a crotalus in rudiment, or strikes the ground.</p>

<p>Several American naturalists have contributed interesting accounts
of this last species, known as the ‘Bull’ or ‘Pine snake,’ or ‘Pilot
snake,’ the largest of the N. American Colubers. It was this species
(<i>Pituophis melanoleucus</i>) whose actions Mr. Sam. Lockwood described as
mystic circles, and its activity as almost equal to that of the ‘Racer’
(<i>American Naturalist</i>, vol. ix. 1875). But it is called the Bull snake
because it ‘roars like a bull.’ Bartram went so far as to say like
thunder! ‘Said to hiss like thunder,’ or ‘resembling distant thunder,’
is the cautious testimony of Holbrooke, who adds, ‘but I never heard
it, though well acquainted with it.’</p>

<p>Mr. Lockwood minutely described one in his possession. In reading
his account we can but notice the similarity of action between this
‘Bull snake’ and the African vipers in ‘puffing,’ though regarding
the nature of the sound, the writer positively affirms that ‘there is
nothing sibilant in this blowing, not the slightest hiss about it.’
Mr. Lockwood records his experience of several that he had seen and
heard, and of a fight between one and a rat. ‘Now began that fearful
blowing. The snake slowly fills its lungs with air, and then expels it
with a bellowing sound that is really formidable.’ And again, in the
same volume, in reference<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">[156]</a></span> to the former account, he says: ‘As there
noted, the <i>Pituophis</i>, when alarmed or enraged, slowly inflates itself
with air, thus nearly doubling its normal size along its entire length,
except the tail. It then slowly expels the air with its own peculiar
sound.’ He recalls his boyish terror on once hearing this sound, which
came upon him suddenly in a field, ‘like the restrained roaring of a
bull.’ This was in New Jersey; but the <i>Pituophis</i> family extends to
the Western States, and to the Rocky Mountains, where ‘Bull snakes’
are frequently seen. In the reports of the United States Exploring
Expeditions, mention has been made of the prairie Bull snake, and of
others in Nebraska and as far west as California.</p>

<p>Some attain to seven feet in length; Holbrooke mentions one of nine
feet, and ‘as thick as your arm,’ in common parlance. An angry snake of
this size could, of course, blow with considerable force, and the term
‘bellowing’ might not unreasonably be applied to the sound; as it is
also applied to the croaking of the ‘bull frog’ (<i>Rana mugiens</i>), the
sound of which is really so like the lowing of cattle, that, on hearing
one for the first time in the woods of Virginia, I looked round, quite
expecting to see a young heifer in close proximity.<a name="FNanchor_44_44" id="FNanchor_44_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44_44" class="fnanchor">[44]</a> Probably, had
the bovine lungs sounded at the same moment, the reptilian ‘bellow’
would have proved but a feeble imitation. A sound out of place, so
to speak, or unanticipated, strikes upon the ear more forcibly than
when expected. But if one reptile, and that a very small one, can so
well imitate a bull as it is universally known the bull frog does,
why<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">[157]</a></span> may not another do the same?&mdash;an argument which I venture to use
notwithstanding many herpetologists accept doubtfully the possibility
of a snake producing such a sound. ‘Il est difficile à concevoir
comment les serpents auraient la faculté de siffler, comme on pretend
que peuvent le faire certaines espèces de couleuvres, et comme les
poëtes se plaisent à nous les representer. Jamais nous n’avons pu
entendre qu’un soufflement très sourd, provenant de l’air qui sortait
avec plus ou moins de rapidité de l’interieur de leur poumon que l’on
voyait s’affaisser en trouvant une issue par la glotte, à travers
les trous des narines ou directement par la bouche dont la mâchoire
superieure est naturellement echanchrée. Alors la bruit était seulement
comparable à celui qui resulterait du passage rapide et continue de
l’air dans un tube ou par un tuyau sec et etroit, comme serait celui
d’une plume.’<a name="FNanchor_45_45" id="FNanchor_45_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_45" class="fnanchor">[45]</a></p>

<p>This no doubt answers to the ordinary ‘hissing’ of the majority of
snakes; but that the sound varies under certain conditions, and in the
same serpent, cannot be denied. A. R. Wallace relates an incident which
may well be introduced here, as affording both a proof of the length
of time snakes can sustain a sort of half suffocation, and also the
expression or power of ‘voice’ in breathing. A young boa was caught,
and in order to prevent its escape, its captors, while preparing a box
in which to convey it away, tied it tightly round the neck to a thick
stick, which not only fettered its movements, but appeared to nearly
stop its respiration. It lay writhing in much discomfort, sometimes
opening its mouth with a suspicious<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">[158]</a></span> yawn, as if trying hard to
breathe. By and by, when relieved from its clog and safely consigned
to a box with bars on the top, it began to make up for loss of time by
breathing violently, ‘the expirations sounding like high-pressure steam
escaping from a locomotive. This continued for some hours, of four and
a half respirations a minute,’ when the breathing&mdash;in this case we may
say panting&mdash;gradually subsided, and then the poor thing settled down
into silence.<a name="FNanchor_46_46" id="FNanchor_46_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_46_46" class="fnanchor">[46]</a></p>

<p>The expression of feelings by the tail in so many snakes, producing a
sibilant sound in rustling dead leaves, and in some which are supposed
never to hiss, is a subject well worth the attention of scientific
naturalists. It would be interesting to ascertain if any peculiarity of
trachea or of glottis exist in these.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-158.jpg" width="200" height="216"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">[159]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-001.jpg" width="500" height="109"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER X.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>HIBERNATION.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">THE periodical torpor known as the winter sleep of reptiles is
intimately connected with respiration, and a chapter must now be
devoted to this subject.</p>

<p>‘Reptiles are obedient to the external atmosphere,’ has been aptly said
of them. Thus, they obey the sun; for if exposed to his rays, they
warm into life and activity. They obey the frost; for when exposed to
its influence, their functions grow feeble or fail altogether, and
they succumb to within a verge of lifelessness. They obey all the
intermediate variations of temperature during the changing year, by
displaying degrees of animation and activity responsive to the degree
of warmth externally which they do not possess in themselves.</p>

<p>Bell speaks of hibernation as ‘amongst the most remarkable and
interesting phenomena which occur in the history of animals.’ It is
not a state of suffering, like that of a warm-blooded creature that is
frozen to death; but with one common impulse, reptiles all retire, and
remain in an almost lifeless repose, with every function so nearly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">[160]</a></span>
suspended, that no external signs of existence are visible. For them it
is a sort of rest, and we may cease to wonder at their longevity since
they live only half their lives. It is, indeed, a convenient mode of
getting through life, reminding us of a theory or proposal ventilated
not long since, by which convicts were to be economically provided
for by submitting them to a certain freezing process, and disposing
them neatly on rows of shelves until the expiration of their term of
punishment; all to be done then was to dust them thoroughly&mdash;perhaps
scrub them a little&mdash;and restore them to the world and life again. And
they were promised to be none the worse, not even to have lost their
memory or to have acquired the rheumatism. Unfortunately the wonderful
process has never been made clear to anxious inquirers, or some others
of us, who are <i>not</i> convicts, might gladly resort to this method of
rest occasionally, and of freezing out the worries of existence.</p>

<p>On the principle of political economy, this would be all very well, and
in the great routine of nature there is beneficence in the hibernation
of creatures, whether reptiles or other animals, that are sent to
sleep at the very time when food fails them. The smaller members of
the class have no longer insects and molluscs; the larger ones feed
chiefly on rodents and birds which have also retired or migrated, or on
their lesser kinsfolk, that no longer abound where most wanted by them.
Therefore, this going to sleep every winter, and doing without food
when there is no food to be had, is most convenient for a considerable
section of animated nature.</p>

<p>There is something strangely analogous in the almost<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">[161]</a></span> total suspension
of vital forces in reptiles to that which vegetation undergoes.
Circulation stops, the juices become stagnant, whether in a tree or
in a snake, and it is sometimes difficult to decide in either case
whether life is extinct or not. But with returning warmth comes renewed
vitality; the fluids, whether of the animal or the vegetable organism,
are thawed by the revivifying solar rays, which set them circulating
and start the pulsation; and the animal machinery, like a watch wound
up, is set in working order again.</p>

<p>It is owing to this lack of warmth in themselves that snakes can live
only in hot countries, or in cooler latitudes, during the warmer
weather, and not at all in the frigid zones. In speaking of them,
Dumeril says Linnæus was right in calling them cold animals in hot
countries. ‘Aussi la plupart des Ophidiens habitent-ils les climats
chauds, et c’est en parlant d’eux que Linné a pu dire avec raison:
“Frigida æstuantium animalia.”’<a name="FNanchor_47_47" id="FNanchor_47_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47_47" class="fnanchor">[47]</a></p>

<p>Dumeril describes their respiration as arbitrary, suspended, retarded,
or accelerated at will. ‘La respiration étant volontairement accélerée
ou retardée, les actions chimiques et vitales qui en resultent doivent
être naturellement excitées ou ralenties par cette cause.’<a name="FNanchor_48_48" id="FNanchor_48_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48_48" class="fnanchor">[48]</a> ‘The
electric fluid,’ says Latreille, ‘is one of the great agents in
animating living beings; and upon reptiles it operates in conjunction
with warmth in rousing them from their inactivity.’</p>

<p>The periodical torpor and insensibility which reptiles undergo cannot,
however, be always associated with extremes of cold, nor in all cases
called strictly a ‘<i>winter</i>’ sleep;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">[162]</a></span> because it is during the hottest
seasons in the tropics that they resign themselves similarly to an
almost death-like repose and temporary tomb, burying themselves in the
mud, which is hard-baked around and over them, almost hermetically
sealed until the rainy season loosens the soil, and frees them from
this literal sarcophagus. In this case the so-called ‘hibernation’ is
the result of drought. It is moisture now which revivifies them, rain
which restores their vital functions, and like the chrysalis bursting
its shell and emerging a new and brilliant creature, the reptile lives
anew, doffs his muddy coat, and reappears in all his resplendent
colouring.</p>

<p>The prairie rattlesnake (<i>Crotalus confluentus</i>) is known to undergo
this species of torpor, which is, in fact, estivation. It is described
as having been found in this ‘stupid condition’ in the dry cañons of
the Rocky Mountains during the droughts of July and August. American
naturalists who accompany the Exploring Expeditions affirm that this
partial torpor is common to many species of snakes, and analogous to
hibernation. They are ‘sluggish, stupid, blind, striking wildly,’ says
one of the official Reports.</p>

<p>Snakes remain torpid on an average half the year. It is a winter sleep
in colder and temperate climates, and a summer sleep in hot ones.
The green garter-snake of the United States hibernates eight months
out of the twelve. So do some of the Australian snakes, others being
underground five months in the year, Krefft tells us. The duration of
insensibility varies, of course, with the climate and season.</p>

<p>Snakes in menageries have been known to manifest inactivity<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_163" id="Page_163">[163]</a></span> and
disinclination for food as early as September if the season be
unusually cold, at other times in October; but, on the contrary,
during a milder season they keep active until November, while some do
not hibernate at all. Their habits there can, however, scarcely be
cited as normal, since the artificial heat regularly maintained in the
Ophidarium never permits the rigours of an out-door winter to affect
them. Nevertheless they manifest the disposition for repose; and if
it could be so arranged that the tropical snakes could be submitted
to tropical heat and drought, and those of cooler countries to frosty
air, as in a state of nature, we might witness both estivation and
hibernation under the same roof.</p>

<p>A partial hibernation is observable in reptiles in captivity when,
though not absolutely inactive, they decline food. For twenty-two
weeks a python at the Zoological Gardens fasted during one winter; at
another time, twenty weeks. The large python (<i>reticulatus</i>) fasted
for one year and eleven months, covering two winters, but fed well
and retained its health after this. Meanwhile, during this prolonged
fast, should a gleam of sunshine penetrate the foggy atmosphere of our
London winters, and shine through the glass roof upon a constrictor’s
coverlet, he may slowly emerge therefrom, displaying a few feet of his
lazy length for an hour or so, thus verifying the words, ‘obedient
to the external atmosphere.’ No creatures are so susceptible of the
changes of temperature; and the same degree which caused them to seek a
retreat will, on the return of spring, reanimate them. And warmth&mdash;in
them almost another word for vitality&mdash;equally affects their appetite.
In the very height of summer, should their feeding-day<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_164" id="Page_164">[164]</a></span> prove a chilly
one, a much lighter drain on the larder is observable, while a warm,
bright day will show a heavy poulterer’s bill <i>in re Ophidarium</i>. Dr.
A. Stradling, a practical ophiologist, found that the common English
snakes ‘thrive exceedingly by reason of their increased appetites,’
when taken to the tropics. ‘It is impossible to say what degree of heat
a reptile will not stand and enjoy,’ says this writer (<i>Field</i>, July
28, 1881). ‘On the hottest days in the hottest places on earth, one
surprises snakes and lizards basking in the blazing sun-glare, on sands
and rocks which it would almost blister the hand to touch.’ Florida is
the most southern extreme of my own experience; but during a summer
there one could not rest the hand on the almost burning stones and
walls on which the reptiles delightedly reposed; and even in England,
during a hot August, my little Bournemouth lizards were positively
hot to the touch when basking in the full power of a bright noon sun.
Dumeril corroborates these facts when he says some reptiles can endure
a temperature higher than blood-heat. Sometimes in early spring he
found a snake seeming to be asleep under a very hot wall which had been
exposed to the mid-day sun, but which had been several hours in shadow.
So tenaciously had the reptile retained the heat it had then absorbed,
that though the air now felt cold, the snake imparted <i>une chaleur très
notable</i> when he touched it. Many times, in taking up a lizard from a
sunny rock in summer, it really has <i>brulé les doigts</i>.<a name="FNanchor_49_49" id="FNanchor_49_49"></a><a href="#Footnote_49_49" class="fnanchor">[49]</a> The old
fable about salamanders living in fire no doubt originates in the fact
of reptiles loving heat as they do. Many pages might be filled with
instances<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">[165]</a></span> of this, and of their approaching fire to a suicidal extent.</p>

<p>Equally strange is the degree of cold to which they can sometimes
submit, and yet recover. But we must conclude that this is when they
are overcome <i>gradually</i>, not suddenly, by it, and not exposed to the
outer air so that the tissues would be injured. Dr. Carpenter mentions
reptiles having been kept three years in an ice-house, and recovering
on being gradually restored to warmth. Too recklessly acting upon this,
I deposited my pet lizards in a small, shallow box containing moss,
sand, and soft rubbish, and left them outside a window to hibernate.
They buried themselves as deeply as they could go,&mdash;only a few inches,
alas!&mdash;but a sudden and severe frost set in, and the poor little
victims were frozen stiff at the bottom of their prison-house. It was
in a bleak north-eastern aspect, and the sharp frost easily striking
through the wood, that slight box must have proved a very different
sort of nest to what they would have chosen on their native heath,&mdash;far
down, and well protected from the icy winds. In a strong, deep box, or
an earthenware jar, with sufficient earth and rubbish in it, they might
have survived.</p>

<p>In the Museum of Paris in 1875-76, sixteen rattlesnakes are said to
have died of cold. The heating apparatus at the Jardin des Plantes is
less effective than our own in London, where very few of the snakes
have been known to suffer from lowered temperature.</p>

<p>Snakes are abundantly supplied with oily fat; thick layers of it line
their intestines in autumn, and this is gradually absorbed during
their torpor. They therefore lose weight,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">[166]</a></span> and awake in an enfeebled
condition, only gradually recovering their normal strength after some
days.</p>

<p>The power of endurance in serpents, and their independence of a large
supply of oxygen, render them important agents in the economy of
nature. In the swamps and morasses where malaria abounds, reptiles
are most numerous. Many such places under canopies of pestilential
vapours, swarm with insects, molluscs, worms, caterpillars, and the
smaller reptiles on which snakes mostly feed. They are, therefore, the
scavengers of such localities; they fulfil a great law by keeping up
the balance of nature even to the extent of rendering certain countries
habitable.</p>

<p>Those ophidian families which prefer higher lands, sandy or rocky
districts, select the sunny hill-sides when the frost sets in, and
hide themselves under stones or in caves where, as described in the
chapter on rattlesnakes, they congregate in vast numbers. Piles and
convolutions of serpents in this condition have often been discovered,
and as often described. It is as if the small degree of animal
warmth each one possessed were harvested for their mutual good, and
to the benefit of the whole community. Nor are these assemblages
at all exclusive as to kind, but are dens of discordant materials,
where, as an American wrote, ‘the liberal terms of admission seemed
only to require the evidence of snakeship.’ Lizards, too, though
of widely-branching kinship, are guided by the same instinct, and
sometimes share the retreat.</p>

<p>A few years ago, near Hayward’s Heath in Sussex, some men who were
levelling the ground for building, dug out of a bank at a depth of from
four to five feet, upwards of one<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_167" id="Page_167">[167]</a></span> hundred slow worms and as many small
lizards, all in a torpid state. It was during February.</p>

<p>At the end of September more recently, a farmer in Wales, who with his
labourers was removing a heap of manure, came upon an extraordinary
bed of snakes and slow worms, and no less than 352 were killed,
together with an enormous quantity of eggs; ‘thousands in clusters were
destroyed.’ Three of the snakes were of immense size, and one hundred
of them nine to twelve inches long.’ These latter were probably slow
worms, and the three ‘immense’ ones ring snakes. One feels curious
to know whether judgment for this act of wanton cruelty visited that
farmer in a destruction of his crops next year by the mice and insects
from which these harmless reptiles would have saved them!</p>

<p>The general reptilian instincts are the same in all climates where
the temperature is similar. In Australia, as Krefft tells us, this is
a grand time among schoolboys for ‘snake-hunting.’ They lay traps of
large flat stones on open sunny ridges where the reptiles are likely
to resort. Six to ten specimens of different species are often taken
under one such stone. Even the venomous kinds may be easily captured
and transferred to a bag in their half-dormant condition. Sometimes
in lifting a stone, a dozen or more handsome and beautiful lizards
are found among their ophidian cousins. The Wallaby hunters generally
provide themselves with a collecting-bag, and thousands of snakes have
thus been transferred to museums. So expert do the hunters become,
that in eight years, the same author affirms, not one accident has
occurred from a venomous<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">[168]</a></span> species. From May to September in Australia,
timid persons need be in no fear of snakes in the ‘scrub.’ The larger
and more dangerous species retire deep into the ground, and only the
young ones under stones. Warm days entice them out for an hour or two,
and they retire again at night, just as is the case with those of the
United States.</p>

<p>The ancients were aware of this hibernation of reptiles; and Pliny,
who, having sometimes a foundation of fact to build upon, is all the
more dangerous from his fabulous superstructure, writes, ‘The viper
is the only serpent that conceals itself in the earth. It can live
there without taking food for a whole year. <i>They are not venomous
when they are asleep</i>,’ he sagely adds. Vipers can live without food
for even more than a year, and so can other snakes; but this often is
irrespective of hibernation, and of this more will be said presently.</p>

<p>A still stronger evidence of vitality or suspended animation is
witnessed in the extraordinary custom of packing the poor wretched
snakes in air-tight bottles, which some barbarous (the word here in
both senses may be used) people adopt. A Cerastes arrived in England
in a bottle, which had been hermetically closed for six weeks, and
it revived. It was so crowded into the bottle as to look quite dead,
but revived directly it was released, and struck a fowl, which died
instantly! Sometimes a bottle or jar is literally crowded with ophidian
captives, that are certainly out of harm’s way so far as others are
concerned, and travel in a compact compass; but it stands to reason
that even when they survive this close imprisonment, they are not in a
very lively condition,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_169" id="Page_169">[169]</a></span> and the large mortality which is found in most
collections may be imputed to a great extent to the unhealthy condition
in which they arrive after injudicious packing. Nailed up in air-tight
boxes, is a very ordinary mode of transportation, a species of cruelty
which would raise a cry of horror were the captive any other than a
despised ‘reptile!’ In connection with breathing or not breathing, and
powers of endurance, <i>such packing</i> receives only a passing mention
here, but is one that should be thoroughly exposed in the <i>Animal
World</i> and similar papers.</p>

<p>One more singular example of periodical repose, but which can scarcely
be called either hibernation or estivation, is seen in the sea snakes,
the <i>Hydrophidæ</i> of the Eastern Ocean. Of these Dr. Cantor affirms
that they are seen so soundly asleep on the surface of the water,
that a ship passing among them does not awaken them. This is the more
remarkable because the eyes of sea snakes are organized to endure
the glare of light only when modified or subdued through water, and
are easily affected when out of it, the reptiles becoming dazzled,
and even blinded, by bright sunshine. So that we must suppose some
peculiar insensibility of nerve in these, or a cessation of active
functions during their repose analogous to the hibernation of land
snakes. Another interesting inquiry suggests itself: viz. How does
one ascertain that an open-eyed snake is ‘<i>asleep</i>’? We called that
Racer (p. 64) ‘asleep,’ as it appeared to be quite unconscious of
interruption, and did not move at our approach.</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_170" id="Page_170">[170]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-075.jpg" width="500" height="112"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XI.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE TAIL OF A SNAKE.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap08">SETTING aside for the present the true death-dealing powers of
the ophidians, viz. the fangs of the poisonous families and the
constricting powers of the larger non-venomous kinds, another
<i>supposed</i> medium of mischief, second only to the tongue, is the tail!</p>

<p>The old-time fables of the ‘stinging tails’ have always obtained
credence, and do so still among the ignorant classes in many countries.
Nor is the belief without some apparent reason, for the tail of a large
number of snakes, both of the poisonous and the non-poisonous families,
terminates in a horny spine more or less hard and pointed. In a few,
this sharp spine is curved with an undeniably weapon-like aspect. Some
of these thorn-like tips might even be capable of inflicting a slight
wound were the owners conscious of this, and had they a disposition to
avail themselves of it. But, as a weapon, snakes do <i>not</i> instinctively
use their pointed tails; they are chiefly assistants in locomotion. As
a fulcrum, and sometimes a propeller, certain species make constant
and important use of them. You may observe that when in a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">[171]</a></span> position
of danger, many snakes trust greatly to the pressure of their tails,
whether pointed or not, as a balance or even a support. This pressure,
which is forcible, but not aggressive, no doubt gave rise in the first
instance to the belief that the snake was intentionally endeavouring to
inflict a wound&mdash;a myth which, like all the other ophidian myths, is so
hard to eradicate.</p>

<p>Sir Thomas Browne, in his <i>Pseudoxia</i>, more than two hundred years
ago, mentioned this as one of the ‘Vulgar Errours.’ As very little
was known of foreign snakes at that time, 1672, excepting through
classic writers, one must suppose that our poor little native <i>Anguis
fragilis</i> was included among the weapon-tailed snakes, ‘that worm with
venomed tongue’ which does really in a remarkable manner make important
though innocent use of its very blunt tail as a means of progression.
He says, ‘That Snakes and Vipers do sting, or transmit their Mischief
by the Tail, is a common Expression, not easy to be justified.... The
Poison lying about their Teeth and communicated by Bite in such as are
destructive. And Bitings mentioned in Scripture are differentially set
down from such as Mischief by Stings.’<a name="FNanchor_50_50" id="FNanchor_50_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_50_50" class="fnanchor">[50]</a> ‘God commanded Moses to
take up the Serpent by the Tail,’ Sir Thomas Browne reminds us, as if
in proof that the caudal extremity was perfectly harmless. ‘Nor are
all Snakes of such empoisoning Qualities as common Opinion presumeth,’
the author endeavours to impress upon his readers, because there are
several histories of domestic snakes from ‘Ophiophagous Nations and
such as feed on Serpents.’ Then follows an opinion equally wise and
witty. ‘Surely the destructive<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">[172]</a></span> Delusion of Satan in this Shape hath
much enlarged the Opinion of their Mischief. Which was not so high with
the Heathens, in whom the Devil had wrought a better Opinion of this
Animal, it being sacred unto the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans, and the
common symbol of Sanity.’</p>

<p>But, alas! many spiny-tailed snakes have sprung to light in various
countries, long since Sir Thomas Browne so wisely instructed his
readers; and even now, the ‘death adder of Australia (<i>Acanthophis
antarctica</i>) is much dreaded on account of its thorn-like tail.’
Krefft’s<a name="FNanchor_51_51" id="FNanchor_51_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_51_51" class="fnanchor">[51]</a> description of the repulsive aspect of this snake is
sufficiently terrifying, apart altogether from its looks alone, its
ragged-looking head, with its loose scales, thick body, and its
short, rough, unmistakeable tail, terminating in a suspicious-looking
point, as if one sharp spine had taken root there, and was capable of
inflicting a wound. The tail spine hardens only in age, he tells us,
and ‘is really not a weapon either of attack or defence.’</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-172.jpg" width="250" height="136"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Death Adder<br />(from Krefft’s <i>Snakes of Australia</i>).</p>
</div></div>

<p>Another tail of evil repute belongs to the Water Viper of the United
States, vernacularly known as the ‘Thorn-tail’ snake, <i>Trigonocephalus
piscivorus</i> of American herpetologists.</p>

<p>John Lawson, in his <i>History of Carolina</i>, published in 1707, was one
of the first to describe it. After him we hear of it<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">[173]</a></span> from Catesby. The
quaint descriptions of each of these early travellers are amusing; and
from such accounts the progress of science is traced.</p>

<p>‘Of the Horn Snake,’ says Lawson, ‘I never saw but two that I remember.
They are like the Rattlesnake in Colour, but rather lighter. They hiss
exactly like a Goose when anything approaches them. They strike at
their Enemy with their Tail, and kill whatsoever they wound with it,
which is armed at the End with a Horny Substance like a Cock’s Spur.
This is their Weapon. I have heard it credibly reported by those who
said they were Eye-Witnesses, that a small Locust Tree, about the
Thickness of a Man’s Arm, being struck by one of these Snakes at Ten
o’clock in the Morning, then verdant and flourishing, at Four in the
Afternoon was dead, and the Leaves dead and withered.’ (Probably the
tree had been struck by lightning during the interval, a very frequent
occurrence in those parts.) ‘Doubtless, be it how it will, they are
very venomous. I think the Indians do not pretend to cure their wound.’</p>

<p>When Lawson travelled, setting out in December 1700, as an appointed
‘Surveyor-General’ of the newly settled colony of North Carolina, very
little was known of the natural history and productions of those parts,
and he relied on the native tribes for much of his information.</p>

<p>His work was dedicated ‘To His Excellency, William Lord Craven,
Palatine; The Most Noble Henry, Duke of Beaufort; The Right Hon. John
Lord Carteret; and the rest of the True and Absolute Lords, Proprietors
of the Province of Carolina in America.’</p>

<p>‘As a Debt of Gratitude the Sheets were laid at their Lordships<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">[174]</a></span>’ Feet,
having nothing to recommend them but Truth, a Gift which every Author
may be Master of if he will.’</p>

<p>With ever so praiseworthy an <i>intention</i> of telling ‘the Truth,’ Lawson
did not possess the scientific knowledge to enable him to guard against
error. Neither did Colonel Beverley, who wrote a <i>History of Virginia</i>,
published in London in 1722, and who perpetuated the ‘stinging tail.’
‘There is likewise a Horn Snake, so called from a Sharp Horn it carries
in its Tail, with which it assaults anything that offends it, with that
Force that, as it is said, it will strike its Tail into the Butt End of
a Musket, from whence it is not able to disengage itself.’</p>

<p>A few years later, Catesby went over the same ground as a professed
naturalist, and afforded a more rational account of this ‘horn snake,’
to which he assigned the name of <i>Vipera aquatica</i>, ‘Water viper,’ or
‘Water rattlesnake.’ ‘Not that it hath a Rattle. The Tail of this Viper
is small towards the End, and terminates in a blunt, horny Point, about
half an Inch long. This harmless little Thing has given a dreadful
Character to its Owner, imposing a Belief on the Credulous that he is
the terrible Horn Snake armed with Death at both Ends, thus attributing
to him another Instrument of Death besides that he had before, though
in reality of equal Truth with that of the Two-headed Amphisbæna. Yet
we are told that this fatal Horn, by a Jerk of the Tail, not only
mortally wounds Men and other Animals but if by Chance struck into a
young Tree, whose Bark is more easily penetrated than an old one, the
Tree instantly withers, and turns black and dies.’<a name="FNanchor_52_52" id="FNanchor_52_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_52_52" class="fnanchor">[52]</a></p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">[175]</a></span></p>

<p>Unfortunately, in mentioning the ‘Horn snake,’ many subsequent writers,
seizing on the marvellous rather than the rational, have omitted the
qualifying ‘it is said to inflict a wound,’ and Catesby’s exposition of
the absurdity; thus handing down as a fact that the tail was truly a
terrible weapon!</p>

<p>It was probably this water viper which Chateaubriand had in his mind
when, towards the end of that century, he described the ‘Prickly snake,
short and thick. It has a sting in its tail, the wound of which is
mortal!’ Chateaubriand was much quoted for a long period.</p>

<p>Dr. J. E. Holbrooke, in his <i>North American Herpetology</i>, published
at New York in 1842, corroborates all Catesby further said regarding
the fish-loving tastes of the ‘Thorn-tail’ snake, and which obtained
for it the specific name <i>piscivorus</i>. It frequents damp and swampy
places, and is never seen far from water. In the summer (during
Catesby’s time), great numbers might be seen lying on the low boughs
of trees overhanging a river, whence they would drop into the water
and pursue the fish with great swiftness. Few fish exceed its velocity
in swimming. <i>Cenchris</i> or <i>Trigonocephalus piscivorus</i> is the name by
which American herpetologists now recognise it. It is becoming rare
where formerly it abounded, but is still found in the wilder districts
of the less settled States, and in the hot weather may be seen lying
motionless on the low branches, and often so like a portion of the
bough as not to be observed till the sudden plunge tells that a deadly
snake was close at hand. It is a cannibal besides, and other snakes
are afraid of it and give it a wide berth. The horny spine<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">[176]</a></span> (which is
a mere hardening and consolidation of the terminal scales) and another
feature, namely the ‘pit’ in its cheeks, described in chap. xxi., prove
it to be allied to the rattlesnake. It is therefore included among the
<i>Crotalidæ</i>, of which more hereafter.<a name="FNanchor_53_53" id="FNanchor_53_53"></a><a href="#Footnote_53_53" class="fnanchor">[53]</a></p>

<p>A number of the ‘Pit vipers’ and <i>Trigonocephali</i> are furnished with
hard-pointed tails, and when they vibrate them rapidly, as many snakes
do under excitement, the rustling against the dead leaves produces a
sound very similar to the sibilation of the true <i>Crotalus</i> tail.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-176.jpg" width="200" height="96"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Tail of <i>Lachesis mutus</i> (exact size).</p>
</div></div>

<p><i>Trigonocephalus contortrix</i>, the ‘Copper-head,’ is another of these.
Also the renowned ‘Bushmaster’ of Guiana and Brazil (<i>Lachesis mutus</i>,
or <i>Crotalus mutus</i>), of which latter Darwin wrote, confirming Cuvier’s
reasons for making it a sub-genus of the rattlesnake:&mdash;‘I observed a
fact which appears to me very curious, as showing how every character,
even though it may be independent of structure, has a tendency to vary
by slow degrees. The extremity of the tail of this snake is terminated
by a horny point, which is slightly enlarged, and as the animal glides
along, it constantly vibrates the last inch or so; and this part,
striking against the dry grass and brushwood, produces a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_177" id="Page_177">[177]</a></span> rattling
noise which can be distinctly heard at the distance of six feet. As
often as the animal was irritated or surprised, its tail was shaken,
and its vibrations were extremely rapid. This <i>Trigonocephalus</i> has,
therefore, in some respects the structure of a viper with the habits of
a rattlesnake.’</p>

<p>Dr. Günther and Sir Joseph Fayrer both mention a peculiarity of this
kind in some of the Eastern representatives of the <i>Crotalus</i>, viz.
the <i>Trimeresuri</i>, Indian tree snakes. The former writes: ‘Some have

prehensile tails, which, when not so occupied, vibrate rapidly,
producing a rustling sound among the leaves.’<a name="FNanchor_54_54" id="FNanchor_54_54"></a><a href="#Footnote_54_54" class="fnanchor">[54]</a> Others of the family
have horny tails.</p>

<p>Dr. Andrew Smith, in his <i>Zoology of South Africa</i>, mentions <i>Vipera
caudalis</i> especially, as having a ‘tail distinctly recognised, at the
termination of his very thick body, and which is not often seen.’ In
the vipers, however, more than others, tails are distinguishable,
those of many of them being short as well as suddenly tapering to a
point. The deadly Puff adder is called <i>Brachyura</i> on this account, its
tail being extremely short for the size of the snake. One exceedingly
dangerous kind in St. Lucia is known as the ‘Rat-tailed snake.’ For
climbing, and as a propelling power, this slender tail can be of little
service. In St. Lucia is also a ‘Rat snake,’ <i>Crebo</i> or <i>Cribo</i> in
vernacular (<i>Spilotes variabilis</i>), one of the active non-venomous
kinds which, not content with rats and mice for food, wages war on its
most venomous fellow-reptiles; as the ‘Racer’ and the ‘King snake’
do against the rattlesnake of the United States. This <i>Crebo</i> is a
graceful, elegant creature, and on account of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">[178]</a></span> its twofold virtues of
mouser and ‘rat-tail’ catcher, is domesticated and petted in some of
the islands.<a name="FNanchor_55_55" id="FNanchor_55_55"></a><a href="#Footnote_55_55" class="fnanchor">[55]</a></p>

<p>In many of the Colubrine snakes it is almost impossible to distinguish
where the ribs cease and the tail begins, except by the anus, so very
gradually does the body taper. Nor does there appear to be any certain
rule about the <i>length</i> of tails, which in some snakes are even longer
than their bodies, and in others not one-tenth the length.</p>

<p>In giving the length of a few snakes (not in feet or inches, but in
the number of their vertebræ), the reader will obtain a clear idea of
this variation in tails. One species of rattlesnake has 194 vertebræ,
of which 168 support each a pair of ribs, leaving 24 for its tail,
or one-eighth. The python has 291 vertebræ, of which the 3d to the
251st support a pair of ribs, leaving 40 for its tail, or less than
one-seventh of its length.</p>

<p>Let me explain a seeming discrepancy of arithmetic. The spine of the
boa constrictor consists of 304 vertebræ, of which 2 next the head
support no ribs, and 252 support each a pair of ribs. Taking away the
first two, which, having <i>no ribs</i>, may be said to form the neck of the
snake, that leaves fifty joints for the tail, or about one-sixth of the
entire length. Our little sums, therefore, are as follows, in reckoning
the vertebræ:&mdash;</p>

<table id="td1" summary="td1">

 <tr>
  <td colspan="2" class="tdc">RATTLESNAKE.</td>
  <td rowspan="6"><span class="vh">&mdash;</span></td>
  <td colspan="2" class="tdc">BOA CONSTRICTOR.</td>
  <td rowspan="6"><span class="vh">&mdash;</span></td>
  <td colspan="2" class="tdc">PYTHON.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Neck,</td>
  <td class="tdr">2</td>
  <td class="tdl">Neck,</td>
  <td class="tdr">2</td>
  <td class="tdl">Neck,</td>
  <td class="tdr">2</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Supporting ribs,</td>
  <td class="tdr">168</td>
  <td class="tdl">Supporting ribs,</td>
  <td class="tdr">252</td>
  <td class="tdl">With ribs,</td>
  <td class="tdr">249</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Tail,</td>
  <td class="tdr">24</td>
  <td class="tdl">Tail,</td>
  <td class="tdr">50</td>
  <td class="tdl">Tail,</td>
  <td class="tdr">40</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td> </td>
  <td class="tdr">&mdash;&mdash;</td>
   <td> </td>
  <td class="tdr">&mdash;&mdash;</td>
  <td> </td>
  <td class="tdr">&mdash;&mdash;</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdr">Total,</td>
  <td class="tdr">194</td>
  <td class="tdr">Total,</td>
  <td class="tdr">304</td>
  <td class="tdr">Total,</td>
  <td class="tdr">291</td>
 </tr>

</table>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">[179]</a></span></p>

<p class="p1">Though in form the ‘neck’ of a snake is often as undistinguishable as
the tail&mdash;‘une tête sans col, et une queue, dont l’origine se confond
avec le reste du corps,’ as Dumeril expresses it&mdash;there is the one
invariable rule belonging to it, namely, that the first two joints of
a snake’s spine are ribless, and that the ribs begin at the third.
Physiologists tell us a snake has no neck, and for reasons which will
be explained in the next chapter; yet, by way of distinction, all speak
of ‘the neck’ as an accepted fact.</p>

<p>No invariable rule as to tails can, however, be established, either as
regards length, shape, or character. Firstly, the length of the tail
varies from inches to feet in snakes of nearly the same size. Secondly,
both venomous and harmless ones are occasionally furnished with horny
tips, and both vibrate them with equal rapidity. Thirdly, snakes that
have long <i>spineless</i> tails also vibrate them rapidly; as do snakes
with short spineless tails; so that one cannot say that spines are
confined to one genus, any more than is their use or their action.
The vibration of the tail is, in fact, only ‘an outlet for suppressed
energy,’ as Professor Shaler of the United States has lucidly put it.
Excitement displays itself in the tail of a snake as much as in the
tail of a dog. This may be observed at the Ophidarium, or wherever
an active snake can be watched. In the rattlesnake it is, of course,
more conspicuous, and always audible when agitated; but many others
similarly display their feelings in their eloquent caudal terminations.</p>

<p>A handsome young python, of about eight feet long, at<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">[180]</a></span> the Zoological
Gardens, has a tail of which the last few inches taper so suddenly that
the extreme end of this reptile appears almost ludicrously trivial for
so fine a possessor. One inch of this&mdash;hardly thicker than a rat’s
tail&mdash;you may see wriggling so rapidly that you can scarcely follow its
movements, or believe that it is a part of the large quiescent body to
which it is attached. In pursuit of its prey the python itself glides
with slow dignity, while the trifling little terminal inch or so of
tail is in a perpetual but most <i>un</i>dignified wriggle.</p>

<p>In the ‘Racer,’ already familiar to the reader, the tail is one-fourth
the length of the body; in the ‘milk snake’ (<i>Coluber eximius</i>),
introduced in chapter iv., it is one-fifth. The extensive variation in
tails may be comprehended by their number of vertebræ, which in some
snakes amount to 200, and in others are reduced to 5.</p>

<p>Of the practical uses of the snake’s tail, the <i>natural</i> uses,&mdash;those
above mentioned being either imaginary ones, or a mere expression
of feeling,&mdash;the prehensile power is one of the greatest. ‘Strictly
speaking, the true prehensile tail is found only in the boa,’ Schlegel,
Owen, and other physiologists tell us; but that statement refers to
some peculiar anatomical construction, enabling the tail to twine and
grasp with extraordinary force, because nearly all snakes can manage to
climb, or to raise themselves when occasion requires it, making use of
their tails, as was stated at the commencement of this chapter. ‘Even
the clumsy, ugly death adder can climb well,’ Krefft assures us, and
that it can support itself against a wall with only a portion of its
tail on the ground.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">[181]</a></span></p>

<p>Many writers and observers, in describing this power or force in
the snake, have given rise to the idea that snakes can <i>stand</i> on
their tails. Erect themselves nearly upright they certainly do, even
without extraneous support for a few moments, and <i>with</i> support for a
considerable time.</p>

<p>Cobras can do this. A personal friend, Colonel C&mdash;&mdash;, when in India,
once heard a sort of muffled sound at his door, which caused him to
open it suddenly, when a cobra, which had raised itself three or more
feet against it, fell straight into the room. He sprang quickly aside,
and ran to fetch a stick, but when he got back the cobra was gone.</p>

<p>But to return to their prehensile powers. Snakes which are not habitual
climbers are often found in trees, suspending themselves from or
supporting themselves upon the branches, as instanced in the chapter
on the egg-eaters. The <i>Hamadryad</i> is also much in trees, as its name
implies, and is seen hanging from the branches. This latter, and also
the Indian tree snakes, <i>Trimeresuri</i>, are poisonous, and far removed
from the boas with the true prehensile tail. Familiar to every one are
illustrations of tropical scenery, in which the boa constrictor and
the anaconda, hanging from trees, are important features. Dumeril, in
general terms, says: ‘Les ophidiens rampent, glissent, s’accrochent,
se suspendent, gravissent en s’aidant de la totalité de leur corps,
sautent, s’élancent, bondissent, nagent, et plongent,’<a name="FNanchor_56_56" id="FNanchor_56_56"></a><a href="#Footnote_56_56" class="fnanchor">[56]</a> in every
one of which movements the tail is an important agent. <i>S’accrocher</i>
and <i>se suspendre</i> must be mainly by the agency of the tail.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">[182]</a></span> Schlegel
follows up his statement, ‘tail strictly prehensile found only in
boas,’ by explaining, nevertheless, that a short tail is sufficiently
vigorous to <i>attach</i> itself to any point, and support the whole
body.<a name="FNanchor_57_57" id="FNanchor_57_57"></a><a href="#Footnote_57_57" class="fnanchor">[57]</a> In the non-venomous tree snakes the tail is long and slender,
and no squirrel or bird is more active and at home in a tree than
these. They glide, swing, climb, and almost fly from branch to branch,
scarcely disturbing a leaf.</p>

<p>Our ‘excellent egg merchant,’ introduced as the Racer, though a
ground snake, is equally at home in a tree, and holds on by its tail
with remarkable adroitness, but then the Racer or ‘Pilot snake’ is a
true boa also. (The true ‘boa’ is distinguished by its dentition and
formation of jaw-bones, the term ‘boa,’ so variously and perplexingly
used by some of the older naturalists, being now restricted to certain
non-venomous species which possess such anatomical structure.)</p>

<p>Lawson’s description of this ‘Racer’ is graphic. ‘The long black Snake
frequents the Land altogether, and is the nimblest Creature living. His
Bite has no more Venom than a Prick with a Pin. He is the best Mouser
that can be; for he leaves not one of that Vermin alive where he comes.
He also kills the Rattlesnake wherever he meets him by twisting his
Head about the Neck of the Rattlesnake, and whipping him to Death with
his Tail. This Whipster, for all his Agility, is so brittle that when
he is pursued, and gets his Head into the Hole of a Tree, if anybody
gets hold of the other End, he will twist and break himself in the
Middle.’</p>

<p>Lawson does not appear to have understood the nature of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">[183]</a></span> constrictors.
‘Whipping’ the rattlesnake was probably only the tail lashed in anger,
or used in controlling the exceedingly active movements of the captor.
As for its ‘breaking itself in halves,’ many exaggerated stories are
told by unscientific spectators of the ‘brittleness’ of snakes, the
simple explanation being that all are alike irritated and terrified
when rendered helpless by their tail being fettered, and may then
struggle until they injure themselves. The common blindworm (<i>Anguis
fragilis</i>) has been seen to so-call ‘break itself in halves;’ but this
will be explained in its place (chap. xxv.).</p>

<p>This sensitiveness&mdash;<i>sensibility</i>, one may almost term it&mdash;in the
tail of snakes has been pointed out by the late Frank Buckland, Dr.
Stradling, and others of like practical experience, affording useful
information in case of danger. ‘If attacked by a boa constrictor, it
is of no use to pull and haul, but catch held of the tip of the tail
and unwind him.’ Also, ‘when striking, aim at the tail. The spinal cord
there being only thinly covered with bone, it is more easily wounded;
and when the spine is broken, the animal is disabled.’<a name="FNanchor_58_58" id="FNanchor_58_58"></a><a href="#Footnote_58_58" class="fnanchor">[58]</a></p>

<p>Certain it is, that by the muscular power of the tail snakes perform
wonderful feats, not only erecting themselves, and maintaining their
balance for a short time, as a long pole is balanced by an acrobat
on his chin or his nose; hanging by an inch or so of the tip, as an
acrobat hangs for a time on one foot or one finger; raising themselves
against a smooth surface, as you see the large pythons at the Gardens
do against the smooth sides or glass fronts of their cages, even to the
very top, but springing, ‘executing leaps,’ as Roget<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">[184]</a></span> and others term
it. For though the ‘leap’ is not strictly like the action of a frog or
a grasshopper, or a man whose two limbs act in concert and together,
the result is the same,&mdash;the reptile accomplishes a long distance with
quickness, decision, and aim. Professor Owen<a name="FNanchor_59_59" id="FNanchor_59_59"></a><a href="#Footnote_59_59" class="fnanchor">[59]</a> calls it a saltatory
motion, ‘the sudden extension of the coils of the body reacting upon
the point of earth on which the tail presses, throwing the serpent
forward.’ Sometimes, when the creature lies closely coiled, the sudden
unbending has the effect of a spiral spring; and occasionally, when
the tail is brought suddenly up to the head, and the serpent springs
forward again, and continues to do this in pursuit, as has often been
witnessed, the effect is that of a rolling hoop, and has given rise to
a belief among the ignorant that the reptile really rolls along.</p>

<p>One in America, known as the ‘Hoop snake,’ is reported to ‘roll down
hill,’ the idea originating possibly from the optical illusion in
consequence of the rapid changes of position&mdash;an effect which we see in
that amusing toy, the zoetrope.</p>

<p>The ‘black snake’ of Australia, <i>Hoplocephalus pseudechis</i>, is one of
the very active venomous kinds, whose motions in pursuit or escape are
almost like leaps, and present the appearance of a hoop or circle.
Reputed ‘hoop snakes’ are there also. The reptile rapidly extends
itself to full length, then brings up its posterior portion in a loop,
and so springs forward again, continuing to do this with amazing
rapidity.</p>

<p>The most easy and natural convolutions of a snake are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_185" id="Page_185">[185]</a></span> <i>lateral</i>. As
closely as their body can be coiled on a given space, as close as a
ribbon or a rope, they can curl themselves round sideways, that is,
with the ventral scales all prone to the ground, and the vertebral
column upwards; nor could they, from the construction of their spine,
coil themselves similarly in a vertical position, as a hedgehog and
a dormouse roll themselves up. But temporarily and partially they
<i>can</i> bend themselves vertically; for you see a snake often with a
part of its body raised vertically against a wall, while the rest is
horizontally along the ground, and consequently one part is at right
angles with the other part, and as the creature rises against the wall
every joint has in turn taken this position. Also, when coiled round
a branch, you do occasionally see that the curves are not invariably
and unexceptionally lateral, but sometimes vertical, although not so
closely so as in the more natural coils. I have very narrowly observed
this, because the ‘hoop’-like motion is often ridiculed; but it seems
a not impossible action when a large circle is described by the body,
though close coils would be less possible.<a name="FNanchor_60_60" id="FNanchor_60_60"></a><a href="#Footnote_60_60" class="fnanchor">[60]</a></p>

<p>A clergyman of Australia had a narrow escape from one of these
‘rolling’ creatures. His daughter gave me an account of the
circumstance, she also, when a resident there, having been well
acquainted with such scenes. Her father accidentally trod on one of
those dangerous serpents, which immediately made a spring at him,
but which he expertly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">[186]</a></span> eluded, and took to his heels with all speed,
knowing the vicious nature of that snake. Looking back, he saw the
reptile pursuing him with ‘strides’ or ‘bounds,’ stretching itself to
full length, then bringing up its tail and springing forward again
with terrific vigour. In its excitement it seemed almost to fly, now
gaining on him, and now, as an occasional obstacle had to be avoided,
giving his victim some slight advantage. For the space of three whole
fields, ‘paddocks,’ he was thus chased, he the while using his utmost
speed. His home was in the bush, and when, almost dropping with
excessive fatigue and terror, he came within sight of it, one of his
farm-servants saw him thus tearing along, and, guessing the cause,
seized his gun, and hastened to meet the fugitive, and put an end to
the chase.</p>

<p>Du Chaillu’s snakes were almost always ‘springing’ at him, and very
probably some of them did so. At the same time, most of his snakes had
‘fangs’ as well; but then, in his ‘<i>Wild Life</i>’ he witnessed many other
anomalies.</p>

<p>As a rule, the most active are the non-venomous kinds; yet among
the venomous colubrines, the slender <i>elapidæ</i>, of which the above
Australian snake is one, we find much activity.</p>

<p>Mr. P. H. Gosse was struck with the amazing springing power of the
yellow Jamaica boa (<i>Chilobothrus inornatus</i>), and by a similar use
of its tail as a propelling power.<a name="FNanchor_61_61" id="FNanchor_61_61"></a><a href="#Footnote_61_61" class="fnanchor">[61]</a> It rears itself up and leaps
an incredible distance, he tells us; one covered nearly twenty feet
in such a spring, but that was on the incline of a hill. He noticed
another suspending<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">[187]</a></span> itself from a branch, not with its tail <i>curled</i>
round, but with a mere tip of it lying longitudinally, pressure alone
supporting the reptile. The slightest contact suffices to maintain the
hold.</p>

<p>There is still one more offending tail to describe. It belongs to a
West Indian relative of our own little ‘blindworm,’ bearing also the
family name, and for more justifiable reasons, inasmuch as the eyes
of the Jamaica species really are not easily distinguished. It is
worm-like in aspect, and of about the same size as <i>Anguis fragilis</i>,
similarly smooth and polished, and so active that it is difficult to
hold it. <i>Typhlops lumbricalis</i> is its name, the first word signifying
blind, and the second worm-like. It moves backwards and forwards with
equal facility, and is therefore commonly called the ‘two-headed
snake.’ The coloured people are dreadfully afraid of its short blunt
tail, which they think can ‘sting,’ and which terminates in a minute
horny nipple on a shining round plate or scale. Being a burrowing
snake, this hard, protected tail is of great use as a fulcrum; but when
off the ground, taken up by the hand, for instance, the little shining
worm makes still further use of its tail, as its English cousin does,
pressing the tip firmly against the fingers, or whatever surface is
near it, to support itself, and to the terror of those who hold it, and
who forthwith dash it down, though it is wholly powerless to injure.</p>

<p>In Australia it has some allies, whose tails are remarkably developed
into this useful point. The reptiles being as round as rulers and as
smooth, the difficulty of progression without this aid as a fulcrum
will be evident. Below are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">[188]</a></span> three tails, which will suffice to
exemplify their purpose and utility.</p>

<p>A curious modification is seen in the centre tail, belonging to
<i>Uropeltis philippinus</i>, which, as the name implies, terminates in a
round disk or shield. This snake is also one of the smooth cylindrical
forms, ‘admirably adapted to burrowing,’ says Dr. Günther. Its
truncated appearance is as if it were chopped clean in halves.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-188.jpg" width="400" height="88"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Tails of three burrowing snakes.</p>
</div></div>

<p>Another is the <i>Cylindrophis</i>, from its form. Several of the burrowing
family are remarkable for a similarity of head and tail, obscure
features, inconspicuous eyes, and very small mouth, rendering it
difficult on first sight to decide which is the head and which the
tail. All being feeble, inoffensive, and entirely harmless, the evil
attached to them of having ‘two heads’ is only another proof of the
prejudice and animosity displayed towards every creature in the shape
of a snake, however innocent. These poor little ‘blindworms,’ admirably
organized to dig and burrow and find their food in deep and hidden
places, have their uses. In countries where dangerous ants swarm, we
might well tremble for the consequences, had not nature anticipated
such evils by providing insectivorous reptiles, as well as birds and
ant-eaters, to keep them in check.</p>

<p>We must not omit one other of the family of burrowing<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">[189]</a></span> snakes, which
from the very earliest ages has been supposititiously endowed with two
heads. Its name, <i>Amphisbæna</i>, or ‘double-walker’ (going both ways),
however, is well merited, because, like <i>Typhlops</i>, it can progress
either way, forwards or backwards, with equal facility. This is the one
alluded to by Catesby (p. 174). We can comprehend the advantage of the
retrogressing power to these otherwise unprotected little reptiles,
when they cautiously peep from their narrow burrow in the ground, and
espy one of their many enemies in the shape of a much larger ophidian,
or a carnivorous bird. Quick as thought, back they glide, and are safe.
Living chiefly among the ants, on which they feed, their cuirass of
hard, polished, close-set scales protects them from a bite or sting.
Another beautiful provision of nature is, that the young ones, on being
hatched, find food ready at hand&mdash;at mouth, rather&mdash;the eggs having
been laid, or the young ones born, in the nest of the ants.</p>

<p>Of this harmless and useful reptile, Pliny seriously wrote: ‘The
amphisbæna has two heads; that is, it has a second one at its tail, as
though one mouth were too little for the discharge of all its venom!’</p>

<p>Even at the present day this belief in ‘two heads,’ or ‘two tails,’ and
‘death at both ends,’ is not wholly eradicated, and not merely among
the lower classes either.</p>

<p>It only remains to say that when two heads have really appeared&mdash;and
there are several such cases on record&mdash;they are simply monstrosities,
malformations, as found in other animals occasionally. An example of
this kind may be seen at the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons.
Another was described by Frank Buckland in <i>Land and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">[190]</a></span> Water</i>, April
1872. It was sent to him by his friend Dr. Bowerbank of St. Leonard’s.</p>

<p>A curious jumble of the <i>Amphisbæna</i> and the Cobra, with its elevated
and expanded neck, is found in the <i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, vol.
iii. p. 863, for 1665. There had been a correspondence on the subject
of two heads, and a reader was evidently sceptical, for the writer thus
protests that he is telling the truth:&mdash;</p>

<p>‘There are indeed such Serpents in these Parts (Java Naja) which have
an Head on each End of their Body, called <i>Capra capella</i>. They are
esteemed Sacred by these People, and fortunate to those in whose House
and Lands they are found; but pernicious to whomsoever doth them Harm.’</p>

<p>This credulous gentleman writes from the East, and cannot corroborate
what he has been told by a personal acquaintance with even an
Amphisbæna, which might really deceive a casual observer. But that
the belief prevailed extensively prior to this, we find from a
distinguished physician of his day, F. Hermandez, or Fernandez, who, in
his work, <i>Animalium Mexicanum</i>, 1628, represents a creature that would
fill one of these pages, with two heads like a ram with wattles and
other ample appendages, and distinguishes it as <i>Amphisbæna Europæa</i>.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-190.jpg" width="150" height="136"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc"><i>Amphisbæna Europæa.</i></p>
</div></div>

<p>‘It is not for us to question the Ancients,’ says the much too
modest author, betraying a lurking misgiving as to the reality of
the creature, but nevertheless doing his best to represent it as his
imagination depicts it. It is here much reduced in size, but may be
found on p. 797 of the above very interesting volume.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_191" id="Page_191">[191]</a></span></p>

<p>Sir Thomas Browne includes this among his ‘Vulgar Errours,’ and traces
it to Nicander, Galen, and other classic writers, but to ‘Ælian
most confidently.’ He discusses the creature with dispassionate
intelligence, and shows us that ‘poets have been more reasonable than
philosophers’ about it.<a name="FNanchor_62_62" id="FNanchor_62_62"></a><a href="#Footnote_62_62" class="fnanchor">[62]</a> Again, if such a thing there were, it were
not to be obtruded by the name of <i>Amphisbæna</i>, or as an animal of one
denomination, with a duplicity of hearts and heads,’ he argues, giving
honour to the head, and therefore that the creature must be dual.</p>

<p>There are frequently some of the smooth, ruler-like snakes in our
London Reptilium; their very small eyes and mouth, and blunt, shapeless
head, render it difficult to decide at the moment between head and
tail. Any with sheep’s heads we are not likely to see, and those that
have had the malformation of two reptilian heads generally present
something of two necks as well. The writers, however, whom we have
quoted were not thinking of monstrosities, but had profound faith in a
veritable <i>Amphisbæna Europæa</i>, which an artist with an unscientific
imagination has handed down to posterity!</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-191.jpg" width="200" height="83"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">[192]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-192.jpg" width="500" height="122"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XII.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>OPHIDIAN ACROBATS: CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRICTION.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap06">BEFORE discussing the most remarkable of all ophidian caudal
appendages, the <i>Crotalus</i> rattle, and the many speculations regarding
it, we will enumerate some other acrobatic achievements of which snakes
are capable; as, in accounting for these, some interesting facts
appertaining to their anatomical structure can be described.</p>

<p>A humorous journalist has said, ‘There is apparently nothing that a
snake can <i>not</i> do, except swallow a porcupine.’<a name="FNanchor_63_63" id="FNanchor_63_63"></a><a href="#Footnote_63_63" class="fnanchor">[63]</a> Presuming that
he alludes to physical feats, he is not far from wrong. For all that,
the Western pioneers of America tell us of yet one more thing that
these reptiles cannot accomplish, and that is, cross over a rope
of horse-hair.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_193" id="Page_193">[193]</a></span> Having by accident discovered that they turn aside
from this, some Western settlers, when camping out, have effectually
entrenched themselves within a circle of horse-hair rope as a barrier
to rattlesnakes while sleeping.</p>

<p>Let us try to account for this.</p>

<p>Many of my readers have seen the cast-off coat of a snake. Those who
have not can have the pleasure of examining one or several the next
time they go to the Zoological Gardens, where the obliging keeper
will cheerfully exhibit them. Others at a distance may not enjoy this
facility, and for these the accompanying diagrams may be a slight
compensation.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-193.jpg" width="400" height="225"
         alt=""
         title="" />
<table id="tc4" summary="tc4">
 <tr>
  <td class="tdc">Portion of slough of a rattlesnake (exact size).</td>
  <td class="tdc">Ventral scales of the same, and a section.</td>
 </tr>
</table>
</div>

<p>The whole cuticle or epidermis of a serpent is composed of these
overlapping scales, of which the above illustrations are only
fragments. Thus when we speak of their <i>scales</i>, we do not mean
distinct and separable laminæ, like the scales of some fishes, each
of which may be scraped or plucked off,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_194" id="Page_194">[194]</a></span> and which overlie each other
like the feathers of birds. The covering of a snake is one entire
piece, loose-fitting, and so arranged as to lie in those scale-like
folds which accommodate themselves to every movement of the body. The
ventral or under scales are, in fact, a regular kilting, as may be seen
by the section; and the upper ones correspond somewhat with what our
lady friends call the shell or the leaf pattern in knitting work. The
outer or exposed folds are stronger, thicker, and more hardened than
the inner parts, just as the knitter ‘throws up’ her pattern with a
coarser wool or larger needles, and knits the less conspicuous parts in
a softer material. The naked space of thinner skin between these scales
being very considerable, one can therefore easily understand how,
when a snake would attempt to pass over a horse-hair rope, the sharp,
prickly hairs, standing out <i>chevaux-de-frise</i> fashion, would insinuate
themselves unpleasantly in those softer and more vulnerable interstices
which become exposed by the sinuations of the body. Probably, if we
knew it, or had an opportunity of observing, we should ascertain that
snakes do not crawl over furze bushes, or thistles, or the prickly pear
(<i>opuntia</i>), or any similar vegetation of tropical climates, and for
the same reason. The close-scaled burrowing snakes, with their hard
and strong cuirass all round them, might have nothing to fear from a
furze bush; but this is mere speculation. That fine, sharp spines or
prickles, and therefore a horse-hair rope, would incommode the tender
intermediate epidermal folds of other snakes, we can well suppose. Had
they sense enough to <i>leap</i> the obstacle, this they could easily do,
after the manner of ‘leaping’ already described; but the ‘leap’ is only
an<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_195" id="Page_195">[195]</a></span> instinctive action used in pursuit or escape; and it may be equally
instinctive to turn aside from uncomfortable obstacles, whether prickly
pears or horse-hair ropes.</p>

<p>Mr. Ruskin, in his highly-entertaining lecture on ‘Snakes,’ at the
London Institution, March 1880 (a lecture which, by the way, was
artistic, poetic, figurative, imaginative&mdash;‘Snakes’ from a Ruskin, but
not a zoological, point of view), remarked ‘that no scientific book
tells us why the reptile <i>is</i> a “serpent,” <i>i.e.</i> serpentine in its
motions, and why it cannot go straight.’ Now, may not the fact that
snakes have acquired these ever-varying sinuations arise from their
sensitiveness to the slightest, and what would be to other creatures
almost impalpable, obstructions in their path?&mdash;mere inequalities which
in their lazy nature it is easier, they know not why, to circumvent
than to surmount; because they <i>can</i> go straight, and <i>do</i> go straight
when the way is plain.</p>

<p>Rymer Jones, in his <i>Organization of the Animal Kingdom</i>, thinks that
their sense of touch from the nature of their integument must be
extremely imperfect; they being ‘deprived of any limbs which can be
regarded as tactile organs,’ p. 753. But close observation leads one
to agree rather with a much older writer, Roget, who, in his <i>Animal
Physiology</i>, intimates that the peculiar conformation of serpents must
be exceedingly favourable to the acquisition of correct perceptions of
touch, and that these perceptions which lead to a perfect acquaintance
with the tangible properties of surrounding bodies must contribute much
to the sagacity of snakes;&mdash;that their whole body is a hand, conferring
some of the advantages of that instrument.</p>

<p>That this latter faculty is strictly and marvellously the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">[196]</a></span> case, we
shall presently see, owing to the flexibility of the spine, and its
capability of grasping and twining round objects of almost any shape,
and of taking, as Roget says, ‘their exact measure.’ For this grasping
power is not confined to the constricting snakes only. In all snakes
a great flexibility is abundantly provided for in the construction
of ‘these lithe and elegant beings,’ as Rymer Jones in unprejudiced
language calls them (p. 724 of the book above quoted); ‘the spinal
column admits the utmost pliancy of motion in any required direction.’</p>

<p>Though snakes have no limbs externally, ‘the work of hands, feet, and
fins is performed by a modification of the vertebral column.’<a name="FNanchor_64_64" id="FNanchor_64_64"></a><a href="#Footnote_64_64" class="fnanchor">[64]</a>
‘Except flying, there is no limit to their locomotion,’ said Professor
Huxley in <i>his</i> lecture on ‘Snakes,’ a few weeks previously to that of
Ruskin, and under the same roof. To both these lectures we shall again
refer, as the reader will feel sure that all coming from such sources
must add value to the present writer’s arguments.</p>

<p>As ‘flying,’ the swift motions of many snakes have been described by
ancient writers, as, for example, the ‘flying serpents’ of Scripture,
though these are by many supposed to be the <i>Dracunculi</i>, the earliest
known of human parasites. The astonishing movements of serpents were,
however, in superstitious ages ascribed to supernatural agency. Says
Pliny: ‘The Jaculus darts from trees, flies through the air as if
it were hurled from an engine.’ The ‘wisest of men’ admitted that
the actions of serpents were beyond his comprehension; ‘the way of a
serpent on a rock’ was ‘too wonderful’ for him.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_197" id="Page_197">[197]</a></span></p>

<p>Even in intermediate ages, when travellers and naturalists began to
confront fiction with fact, even in the days of Buffon and Lacepède,
a serpent was regarded as a living allegory rather than a zoological
reality by many intelligent, albeit unscientific persons. Of such
was Chateaubriand, whose contemplation of the serpent partook of
religious awe. ‘Everything is mysterious, secret, astonishing in this
incomprehensible reptile. His movements differ from those of all
other animals. It is impossible to say where his locomotive principle
lies, for he has neither fins, nor feet, nor wings; and yet he flits
like a shadow, he vanishes as if by magic, he reappears, and is gone
again like a light azure vapour on the gleams of a sabre in the dark.
Now he curls himself into a circle, and projects a tongue of fire;
now standing erect upon the extremity of his tail he moves as if by
enchantment. He rolls himself into a ball, rises and falls like a
spiral line, gives to his rings the undulations of a wave, twines round
the branches of trees, glides under the grass of the meadow, or skims
along the surface of the water,’ and so forth.<a name="FNanchor_65_65" id="FNanchor_65_65"></a><a href="#Footnote_65_65" class="fnanchor">[65]</a></p>

<p>Excepting the ‘tongue of fire,’ the whole of this poetic description is
so far true and unexaggerated, that Chateaubriand has not attributed
to the reptile one action of which it is not capable, and which, to
the untutored mind, might well seem supernatural. Roget, Schlegel,
Huxley, and others tell us the same things in the language of science.
To quote them all is impossible; the reader will be content with one
scientific assurance of ophidian capabilities, not less poetic than
Chateaubriand’s.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_198" id="Page_198">[198]</a></span></p>

<p>Professor Owen, in describing the bony structure of the Ophidia,
and in allusion to the scriptural text&mdash;‘Upon thy belly shalt thou
go’&mdash;affirms that so far from the reptiles being degraded from a higher
type, their whole organization demonstrates how exquisitely their parts
are adapted to their necessities, and thus proceeds: ‘They can outclimb
the monkey, outswim the fish, outleap the jerboa, and suddenly loosing
the coils of their crouching spiral, they can spring into the air and
seize the bird upon its wing.’</p>

<p>The active snakes can always ‘leap’ their own length, whether upwards
to seize a bird, or horizontally, and, as in the case of the Jamaica
boa (described p. 186), can leap much farther from a similar impetus
when the direction is <i>downwards</i>. Indeed, they can let themselves fall
from a certain elevation with an additional impetus to progress, as a
boy first runs in order to leap a ditch.</p>

<p>‘With neither hands nor talons, they can out-wrestle the athlete,
and crush their prey in the embrace of their ponderous, overlapping
folds.... Instead of licking up its food as it glides along, the
serpent uplifts its crushed prey, and presents it grasped in its
death-like coil, as in a hand, to its gaping mouth.’<a name="FNanchor_66_66" id="FNanchor_66_66"></a><a href="#Footnote_66_66" class="fnanchor">[66]</a></p>

<p>A similarly graphic account is given by Rymer Jones, p. 718 of his
work,<a name="FNanchor_67_67" id="FNanchor_67_67"></a><a href="#Footnote_67_67" class="fnanchor">[67]</a> that will be read with interest by those who wish to pursue
the study scientifically.</p>

<p>In watching the larger constricting snakes while feeding, you see
how <i>dexterously</i> they manage.&mdash;(One may use this word here, because
those above quoted, ‘as in a hand,’ are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_199" id="Page_199">[199]</a></span> literally, scientifically
true; therefore we may suppose fingers as well as a hand, and say how
dexterously the creatures bring their coils to their aid.)</p>

<p>They have quickly strangled and begun to eat, say an opossum or
a turkey buzzard, when a part of the prey not swallowed offers
some impediment to the expanded jaws; the wings or legs may be
inconveniently extended, or have become wedged between some immoveable
obstacles&mdash;a log, a narrow space, or under a portion of themselves.
Their mouth, the only apparent grasping agent, is already occupied, and
a strain sufficiently powerful, while the jaws are thus retaining the
prey, would be painful to the feeder, might even drag back the food,
to the injury of the engaged teeth. How does the reptile proceed in
this emergency? With the lightness and deftness of enormous strength,
it applies two folds of its body, two loops of its own coils, and with
them drags forth, lifts up, or otherwise adjusts its prey in a more
convenient position&mdash;in fact, ‘presents it as in a hand’ to its own
mouth.</p>

<p>A very remarkable instance of a constricting snake thus using its
coils is related by Dr. Elliott Coues, of the United States army,
late surgeon and naturalist to the United States Northern Boundary
Commission. He witnessed one of those frequent combats between the
Racer and the Rattlesnake, in which the former&mdash;and in far less time
than it takes to read one line of this page&mdash;threw two folds or coils
round his adversary, one coil of the anterior portion of his own body
round one part, and a second coil of the posterior portion of his own
body round another part, and then, by a sudden extension of himself,
tore the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">[200]</a></span> rattlesnake in halves. And this was done with greater ease
and swiftness than we could snap a thread which we must first secure
round the fingers of our two hands. As if indeed possessed of two
hands, the constrictor snapped his foe in twain. This is Lawson’s
‘Whipster,’ p. 182.</p>

<p>The coiling of the constricting snakes is like lightning; you cannot
follow the movements. In this case death must have been instantaneous,
and indeed it is doubtful whether any beast or bird of prey puts his
victim to a more speedy and less torturing death than the constrictors
when following their own instincts.</p>

<p>Repairing to the Zoological Gardens in the hope of witnessing the
wonderful adaptation of coils to manual uses, after reading what
Roget and Owen had affirmed, one soon had a favourable opportunity
in watching a python. It was, I think, in June 1874, and the poor
python had a ruptured side. In spite of which&mdash;as my zoological notes
record&mdash;‘it helped by the folds of its body to get the wings of the
duck down flat and close, so as to swallow it more easily. With reason
does Roget say, “Its whole body is a hand,” for it used its loops to
hold and to push and to flatten in a manner truly intelligent.’</p>

<p>Such was my first entry and observation. Subsequently, and indeed
almost on every feeding day, the same kind of thing was to be seen at
the Gardens. Many such examples are recorded in my notebook; but of
these one or two later notes will suffice to illustrate the subject.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">[201]</a></span></p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-201.jpg" width="400" height="252"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">‘Totsey,’ a python born in the Gardens, June 30, 1877,<br />
taking her supper, Sept. 24, 1880.</p><br />
</div></div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">[202]</a></span></p>

<p>A young python was hanging from a branch, more than half its body
curved as in the accompanying sketch, remaining motionless and
quiescent, watching some sparrows which the keeper had just put into
the cage. The birds, eyeing certain insects among the gravel, seemed
all unconscious of the pair of glistening eyes looking down upon them.
Suddenly a movement, a flicker, like the flash of a whip, and the snake
had changed its position. Too quick for us to follow the motion, but in
that flash of time it now hung like a pendulum, with a sparrow almost
hidden in its coils. The snake had precisely measured its distance,
reached down, and recoiled with the swiftness of an elastic spring.
After a few minutes, <i>feeling</i> that its prey was dead, it prepared to
swallow it, holding it encircled in a portion of its body, while the
head was free to commence the usual examination. Still hanging there,
it held and devoured the bird.</p>

<p>On another occasion, one of the larger pythons caught a guinea-pig
in the same manner. This also was so quick in its movements that one
scarcely knew what had happened until the snake was seen to have
changed its position, some of the anterior coils had embraced a
something, and a quadruped was missing. This snake also still hung
while eating its meal, the whole process occupying less than ten
minutes. In both these cases we saw the prehensile tail in its natural
use, while the rest of the body was free for action.</p>

<p>One of the most remarkable cases of what we may call independent
constricting powers, that is, two or more parts of the reptile being
engaged at the same time, was in some very hungry, or very greedy, or
very sagacious little constrictors, the ‘four-rayed snakes,’ <i>Elaphis
quater-radiatus</i>.</p>

<p>They are slender for their length, which may be from<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">[203]</a></span> three to five
feet, of an inconspicuous colour, but with two black lines on each
side, running the whole length of their body; hence their name,
‘four-lined,’ or ‘four-rayed.’ In the present instance, there were in
the same cage three of these, also one young royal python, one small
common boa, and one ‘thick-necked tree boa’ (<i>Epicratis cenchris</i>), all
constrictors. The day was close and warm for April, and the snakes,
reviving from their winter torpor, seemed particularly active and
lively. Probably they had not fed much of late, and thought now was
their opportunity, for the keeper no sooner threw the birds&mdash;finches,
and plenty of them for all&mdash;into the cage, than there was a general
scuffle. Each of the six snakes seized its bird and entwined it,
then on the part of the reptiles all was comparatively still. The
rest of the poor little birds, fluttering hither and thither, were,
however, not disregarded, for although each snake was constricting its
captive, several of them captured another bird by pressing it beneath
them, and holding it down with a disengaged part of themselves. One
of the four-rayed snakes felt its held-down victim struggling, and
instantaneously a second coil was thrown round it. Then another caught
a second bird in its mouth, for its head and neck were not occupied
with the bird already held, and in order to have coils at its disposal,
slipped down its first captive, or rather passed itself onwards to
constrict the second, the earlier coils not changing in form in the
slightest degree, any more than a ring passed down a cord would change
its form. The next moment I saw one of those two hungry ones with
three birds under its control. It had already begun to eat the first,
a second was coiled about eight inches behind, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">[204]</a></span> a good deal of
the posterior portion of the reptile was still disengaged when a bird
passed across its tail, and instantly that was captured. All this was
done by a sense of feeling only, as the snakes did not once turn their
heads. Two of these ‘four-rayed’ snakes were so close together, so
rapid in their movements, so excited and eager for their prey, that
which of them first began his bird, and which one caught the third, it
is impossible to affirm confidently.</p>

<p>Whenever either of them was in the same position for one quiet minute,
a few hurried strokes of the pencil fixed them in my notebook, and of
the hasty though faithful sketches thus made, I present three to the
reader on the opposite page.</p>

<p>April 1st, 1881.&mdash;After this date nothing more was to be seen!
Henceforth visitors were to be excluded, and the reptiles were to be
fed <i>after sunset</i>.</p>

<p>Now, however painfully and sympathetically we may regard those poor
little birds so unceremoniously seized, crushed, and devoured, we can
but reverently, and almost with awe, admire the astonishing facility
with which these limbless, toolless reptiles provide themselves
with food. With still deeper awe and reverence we shall admire when
we examine their anatomical structure, and see by what marvellous
development it has been adapted to their necessities.</p>

<p>We feel sadly for the finches, it is true; because finches are often
our pets, and are sweet songsters. Were a toad or a rat thus treated,
we should care less, perhaps; because there is as much repugnance
towards toads and ‘vermin,’ as towards snakes.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">[205]</a></span></p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-205.jpg" width="400" height="263"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">[206]</a></span></p>

<p>But if the finches did not become the prey of snakes, they would become
the victims of bird-catchers and milliners; and if they escaped these
wanton spoilers, they would fall victims to birds of prey, as much
larger birds fall victims to our own need of food.</p>

<p>Reptiles also have existence and requirements, and an organization
adapted to such requirements. This should be their claim upon our
tolerance; and if they do not win our admiration, we cannot deny them
the right to live, the right to feed according to their instincts,
and to secure their natural food in their own way, which&mdash;begging the
reader to pardon this feeble moralizing&mdash;we find to be a very wonderful
way.</p>

<p>Though the term ‘reptile’ is applied to a whole tribe of crawling
creatures, whether four-legged or limbless, that are covered with
scales, horny plates, or a skin more or less hardened, imbricated, or
rugose (viz. crocodiles, lizards, frogs, toads, serpents, and their
congeners), snakes are more truly reptiles, being limbless, from
<i>repo</i>, to creep. Hence serpents (from <i>serpo</i>, to creep, and its
derivatives serpentine, serpentize, etc., from <i>serpens</i>, winding)
have been separated from the rest. The true serpents, therefore, are
those without feet, and which move only close to the ground, by the
sinuations of their body.</p>

<p>We have seen that the constricting snakes use this body as a substitute
for hands, literally <i>managing</i> with it; but though they are externally
legless, and <i>apodal</i> (without feet), the truth is that few creatures,
none perhaps, not even millipedes, are more liberally furnished with
legs and feet than serpents. One curious exception to general rules is,
that while other creatures have the same number of feet as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_207" id="Page_207">[207]</a></span> legs, that
is, one foot to each leg, a snake has only one foot to each pair of
legs!</p>

<p>Many of my observant readers have already discovered for themselves
where and what these numerous legs and feet are. In the early days of
my ophidian studies, which then consisted chiefly of observations, I
noticed the action of limbs beneath the skin of the pythons as they
moved about, and more particularly when they were climbing up the glass
in front of their cages, and as in the case of the glottis, I thought
I had made a grand discovery; and so I had, as far as myself was
concerned.</p>

<p>Deductions from personal observation, which in the history of many
sciences have again and again been claimed as original discoveries by
rival thinkers or experimentalists, no doubt <i>were</i> original on the
part of each.</p>

<p>Probably, also, many other persons have noticed this leg-like action
of the ribs, but who, not being specially interested in snakeology,
have never troubled themselves to ascertain ‘further particulars,’ or
cared whether any one else had observed this or not. But it <i>is</i> a very
evident and unmistakeable action, and one quite worth studying on your
next visit to the Reptilium.</p>

<p>Books on ophiology tell us that Sir Joseph Banks was the first to
observe this limb-like action of the ribs. Sir Everard&mdash;then Mr.&mdash;Home,
F.R.S, and the most distinguished anatomist of his time, was, however,
the first to publish a scientific description of the fact; his account
and the illustrations accompanying it having been subsequently adopted
by most ophiologists.</p>

<p>In vol. cii. of the <i>Philosophical Transactions</i> of 1812, p.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_208" id="Page_208">[208]</a></span> 163, is a
paper which was read before the Royal Society in February of that year,
by Everard Home, Esq., F.R.S. It is entitled, ‘Observations to show
that the Progressive Motion of Snakes is partly performed by the Ribs.’</p>

<p>We give his introductory words, not only because the ‘discovery’ was
a great event in the history of ophiology, but as showing that to see
and examine a foreign snake was at that time a rare if not a novel
occurrence. He tells us that on a former occasion in 1804, he had
described the anterior ribs of a cobra, those which form the ‘hood.’ At
that time he was ‘not in possession of the bodies of snakes,’ so that
he could compare their structure, but had <i>since</i> found out a good deal
more about their anatomy, and then he proceeds: ‘A Coluber of unusual
size lately brought to London to be exhibited, was shown to Sir Joseph
Banks. The animal was lively and moved along the carpet briskly; while
it was doing so, Sir Joseph thought he saw the ribs come forward in
succession, like the feet of a caterpillar. This remark he immediately
communicated to me, and gave me an opportunity of seeing the snake
and making my own observations. The fact was already established, and
I could feel the ribs with my fingers as they were brought forward.
I placed my hand under the snake, and the ribs were felt distinctly
upon the palm as the animal passed over it. This becomes the more
interesting discovery as it constitutes a new species of progressive
motion, and one widely different from those already known.’</p>

<p>The ‘unusually large Coluber’ was probably a python. Had a previous
opportunity presented itself to this scientific and thoughtful
observer, Sir Joseph Banks might not have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">[209]</a></span> been the one to carry off
the palm in this discovery. Home had already described the peculiarity
of the cobra’s anterior ribs (chap. xviii.), and, as already suggested,
it is scarcely possible to watch one of those larger constrictors
<i>without</i> perceiving the mode of progression. We shall see in the
course of this book that snake observers have arrived at the same
conclusions on several points, while wholly ignorant of what others had
said or decided regarding the same.</p>

<p>In the previous chapter the number of vertebræ forming the spinal
column of three or four snakes was given, but this number varies
greatly, not only in snakes but in species. In some species there are
above 400 vertebræ or joints in a snake’s spine. But here is a puzzle
that baffles the student. ‘Every one knows,’ says Schlegel, ‘that their
number differs’ (speaking of the vertebræ), ‘not only according to the
species, but also in individuals, so that sometimes we find in serpents
of the same species a difference of thirty or forty vertebræ more or
less.’<a name="FNanchor_68_68" id="FNanchor_68_68"></a><a href="#Footnote_68_68" class="fnanchor">[68]</a></p>

<p>Taking this literally according to the text, one might expect to find
one ring-snake in a family of ten measuring two feet, while his brother
measured two yards, and a third four feet, and so on, as if each had a
different number of vertebræ.</p>

<p>‘The same species,’ that is, two anacondas or two cobras! ‘A
mistranslation,’ one naturally decided, and proceeded to consult the
original. But no. The translator had faithfully and unquestioningly
followed the original French; but the fact was so irreconcilable that I
sought Dr. Günther’s kind assistance in comprehending the passage.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_210" id="Page_210">[210]</a></span></p>

<p>‘Evidently an oversight. Manifestly impossible,’ that learned authority
at once decided. (As Schlegel stands high as a scientific ophiologist,
the misprint is pointed out for the benefit of future students.)</p>

<p>Thus lengths, <i>as to the number of vertebræ</i>, vary in species of the
same genus, but <i>not</i> in ‘individuals of the same species.’ And this
alone is sufficiently perplexing.</p>

<p>For example, we read in one work that a rattlesnake has 194 vertebræ,
and in another that ‘it,’ viz. ‘a rattlesnake,’ has 207 vertebræ. Both
equally correct, because two distinct species are described. Again,
Dr. Carpenter, in his <i>Animal Physiology</i> (edition of 1872), gives a
table of the vertebræ of various animals, in which ‘a python’ has 422
joints, while Owen gives ‘a python’ 291 joints, each learned anatomist
having examined a different species. By these facts we comprehend what
Schlegel intended to say.</p>

<p>The little constrictors caught their finches with five feet of body
at their disposal. An anaconda, with five yards of body to work with,
might with equal ease coil three opossums.</p>

<p>‘The skeleton of a snake exhibits the greatest possible simplicity
to which a vertebrate animal can be reduced,’ says Roget. It is
‘merely a lengthened spinal column.’ It is ‘simple’ in the same way
that botanists call a stem simple when it has no branches, or bracts,
or leaves, to interrupt its uniformity. For this reason, having no
limbs, and therefore none of those bones which in quadrupeds connect
the limbs to the trunk, the spine is, in unscientific language, alike
all the way down; ‘<i>un corps tout en tronc</i>.’ And because those two
first joints of the spine which have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_211" id="Page_211">[211]</a></span> no ribs attached to them are in
form precisely like the other joints, physiologists tell us that a
snake has ‘no neck.’ By way of simplifying matters we just now called
those two joints an invariable neck. But in the way of <i>cervical</i> or
neck vertebræ, however, we must bear in mind that a true anatomical
neck, in the eyes of science, a snake has not. Some of the four-legged
reptiles have a true neck, that is, they have cervical vertebræ which
differ from dorsal, lumbar, etc. vertebræ, as we ourselves and mammals
in general have; because four-legged reptiles have a breast-bone and
limbs to support, and their neck varies in length. For example, a
tortoise has nine cervical or neck joints, a monitor lizard six, and a
salamander only one.</p>

<p>But so also do the necks of mammals vary very greatly <i>in length</i>,
while all, without exception, are formed of seven joints, <i>only seven
vertebræ</i>; a man, a whale, a giraffe, and a mouse possess each seven
cervical vertebræ, different in form from the rest of the joints of the
spinal column. We might say that in appearance a whale has no neck,
but its seven neck joints are flat and close as seven cards or seven
pennies, while those of the giraffe are extraordinarily prolonged; and
in ourselves&mdash;well, of course, the reader will admit the perfection
of symmetry in our own necks, and the seven joints, therefore, are
precisely of the proper size.</p>

<p>While the spine of a snake is ‘simple’ in respect of its joints being
all formed on the same plan, it is the reverse of simple in its
wonderfully complex structure. Professor Huxley, in his delightful
lecture, said that ‘the most beautiful piece of anatomy he knew was
the vertebra of a snake.’ Professor Owen thus anatomically describes
it: ‘The vertebræ<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_212" id="Page_212">[212]</a></span> of serpents articulate with each other by eight
joints, in addition to those of the cup and ball on the centrum; and
interlock by parts reciprocally receiving and entering one another,
like the joints called tenon and mortice in carpentry’ (<i>Anatomy of the
Vertebrates</i>, p. 54).</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-212.jpg" width="400" height="203"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Front and back view of a vertebra.</p>
</div></div>

<p>Bearing in mind that each of these highly complicated joints supports
a pair of moveable ribs, and that the ends of these ribs are connected
by muscles with the large stiff scutes or scales crossing the under
surface of the body (see illustrations, p. 193), which move with the
ribs, one foot-like scale to each pair, we comprehend how snakes exceed
millipedes in the number of their <i>limbs</i>, if not true legs, and how
they excel the insect also in variety of movement. Those ‘ball and
socket’ joints admit of free lateral flexion, and every variety of
curvature&mdash;‘<i>the utmost pliancy of motion</i>,’ to repeat the words of
Rymer Jones; and also of that surprisingly independent motion which
enables the constrictors to surpass even the <i>Bimana</i> (except practised
experts) in doing <i>several things at once</i>.</p>

<p>Thoughtful persons who can contemplate this wondrous<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">[213]</a></span> organization with
due reverence, and witness it in activity&mdash;as we admiringly observe the
works of a watch in motion&mdash;will forget to censure those who supply
food to this piece of animated mechanism, and even pardon a hungry
little snake for so expertly securing three birds at once.</p>

<p>Think of 300 back-bones and 300 pairs of legs, all requiring wholesome
exercise. Some snakes have 300 pairs of ribs&mdash;each pair capable of
independent motion, and articulated with that complex spine; and each
pair moving together, and carrying along with them a foot in the shape
of a broad ventral scale. ‘This scutum by its posterior edge lays hold
of the ground,’ says Sir Everard Home, ‘and becomes a fixed point
whence to set out anew.’</p>

<p>The hold which the ventral scales have of the ground obviously renders
it easier for the reptiles to pass over a rough than a smooth surface;
what are obstacles to other creatures are facilities to them. But they
appear to be never at a loss. On a boarded room, or even a marble
floor, they will manage progression of some sort,&mdash;many by the pressure
of the tail to push themselves forward, and others with an action that
can be compared only with swimming. With the same rapid, undulating
motion as swimming, the active snakes skim through the grass, or over
soft herbage, on which they seem to make no impression. Their swift
sinuations are almost invisible to the eye. You only know that a snake
<i>was</i> there, and now has vanished. The ‘Rat’ snake of Ceylon (<i>Ptyas
mucosus</i>) (see frontispiece) and the ‘Pilot’ snakes of America are
among the best known of these swift-flitting or gliding creatures.</p>

<p>Rats are fleet little quadrupeds, but their enemies, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">[214]</a></span> Rat snakes
of India, are more than their match. Sir Emerson Tennant, in his
<i>History of Ceylon</i>, describes an encounter with one. <i>Ptyas mucosus</i>
caught a rat, and both captor and captive were promptly covered with
a glass shade to be watched. With an instinct to escape stronger than
hunger, <i>Ptyas</i> relinquished his hold, and manifested uneasiness. Then
the glass shade was raised a trifle, and instantly away ran the rat;
but the snake was after it like a flash, caught it, and glided away
swiftly, with head erect and the rat in its mouth.</p>

<p>At one of the Davis lectures at the Zoological Gardens, a fine Rat
snake in the Society’s collection was exhibited, and was permitted to
be handled by a favoured few. To hold it <i>still</i> was not possible,
for the creature glided through the hand, and entwined itself about
one as if a dozen snakes had you in possession. It was very tame, and
accustomed to be handled by the keeper, whose especial pet it was;
otherwise <i>Ptyas</i> is a powerful snake, and quite capable of strangling
you should it take a fancy to constrict your neck. On another occasion
this same snake constricted my arm sufficiently to make my fingers
swell; but that was not so much in anger as for safety, because it
did not like to be fettered in its movements, or to be somewhat
unceremoniously examined. A younger and less tame specimen tried to
bite me, and squeezed my fingers blue by constricting them.</p>

<p>There is no circumventing these ‘lithe and elegant beings.’ They will
get into your pocket, or up your sleeve; and while you think you have
the head safely in your hand, the whole twelve feet of snake will have
glided through, and be making its way to the book shelves, or where you
least expect to see it.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">[215]</a></span></p>

<p>When frequently handling the young constrictors, one has been able
to <i>feel</i> as well as to observe the action of the ribs. As they pass
through the hand, you feel them expanded, so as to present a flatter
under surface. In <i>Ptyas</i> the back is remarkably keeled when crawling,
a section of his body presenting the form of the middle diagram given
below.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-215.jpg" width="300" height="109"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<p>Schlegel describes the forms which the bodies of various snakes assume
in swimming, climbing, clinging, etc. Sometimes they are laterally
compressed, at others flattened. The three figures above are on a much
reduced scale, but give an idea of the sections of three different
snakes, though each snake is capable of several such changes of form.
When snakes climb against the glass of their cages, you may easily
discern the flattening of their bodies. In this action there seems to
be a compressing power, any hold of the scutæ against a polished plane
being, of course, impossible; yet without holding they seem to cling;
and the ribs advance in wave-like intervals just the same, with an
intermediate space at rest until in turn the wave is there and passes
on, while from an anterior portion another wave approaches, and so on.
Yet the <i>compressure</i> strikes one forcibly. There is also the evident
support of the tail in a large python thus crawling to the very top of
his cage.</p>

<p>Mr. Gosse observed the dilatation and flattening of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_216" id="Page_216">[216]</a></span> body in the
climbing snakes, and that they had no more difficulty in gliding up a
tree or a wall in a straight line than on the ground. In the <i>Anecdotes
of Serpents</i>, revised for the Messrs. W. &amp; R. Chambers, of Edinburgh,
in 1875, from the tract by the late John Keast Lord, I also recorded my
observations on this peculiarity.</p>

<p>Some young Jamaica boas crawled to the top of their cage as soon as
they were born. I saw them the same day; <i>held</i> them, as well as it
was possible to hold threads of quicksilver; <i>felt</i> them, too, for
the exceedingly juvenile constrictors tied up my fingers cleverly. So
did some young boa constrictors, born alive at the Gardens, June 30,
1877. They were from fifteen to twenty inches in length, and had teeth
sufficiently developed to draw blood from Holland’s hand, showing fight
and ingratitude at the same time. They were exceedingly active, and fed
on young mice, which they constricted instinctively. One of them, known
as ‘Totsey,’ subsequently <i>hung</i> for her portrait, as on p. 201.</p>

<p>In vol. xx. of <i>Nature</i>, p. 528, is a very clever paper on the
progression of snakes, by H. F. Hutchinson, who has evidently
observed them closely. He arrives at the conclusion that they have
three different modes, viz. ‘on smooth plane surfaces by means of
their rib-legs;’ ... ‘through high grass by rapid, almost invisible,
sinuous onward movement, like swimming;’ in climbing straight walls
or ascending smooth surfaces by creating a vacuum with the ventral
scales. He reminds us that cobras, kraits, the rat snake, and other
slender and active kinds are constantly found on house roofs, walls,
straight smooth trees, etc., and asks how they got there. He has seen
the ‘abdominal scales<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">[217]</a></span> creating a vacuum like the pedal scales of house
lizards.’ He put some active little snakes on the ground, where there
was no hold for the scutæ, and they ‘flew about in all directions.’ He
saw that they moved on by these quick, sinuous curves&mdash;‘rapid wriggles.’</p>

<p>In company with my esteemed friend, Mr. Robert Chambers of Edinburgh,
we made similar experiments by placing some of the smooth-scaled,
active snakes on a boarded floor. Being extremely wild, they displayed
their anger and skill to perfection, and literally <i>swam</i> along,
scarcely touching the floor, and so swiftly that we had difficulty in
pursuing and securing them again. Some very young <i>Tropidonoti</i> when
disturbed flew or ‘swam’ about their cage in the same manner. We also
saw pythons climb up a window-frame, and a corner of the room where no
visible hold could be obtained; and after the example of Sir Everard
Home, we allowed the reptiles to crawl over our hands, when we could
feel the expansion and flattening of the body by the spreading of the
ribs. I incline to agree, therefore, with the writer in <i>Nature</i>, that
there is a sort of vacuum created by the ventral scales. Dr. Stradling
observed that on occasions of retreat, some snakes move in such rapid
and ever-varying sinuations as to baffle you completely when you
attempt to lay hold of them; the part you thought to grasp is gone.<a name="FNanchor_69_69" id="FNanchor_69_69"></a><a href="#Footnote_69_69" class="fnanchor">[69]</a>
Such are the movements of <i>Pituophis</i> and of <i>Echis</i> (p. 151).</p>

<p>At the risk of being tedious, a few more words must be added on this
subject of progression, because we so constantly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">[218]</a></span> see it asserted that
snakes ‘move with difficulty over smooth surfaces.’ Their actions have
not excited sufficient attention and study. Have you ever watched them
moving about in their bath at the Zoological Gardens? The motions of
a python once particularly struck me. The earthenware pan was smooth
polished ware, and with enough water in it to render it smoother, if
that be possible. The reptile was not swimming, for the thicker part
of its body was not even wholly submersed. The pan was too shallow
for that, and too small to permit of any portion of the python being
fully extended. It moved in ever-varying coils and curves, yet with
the greatest ease, its head slightly raised, so that the nostrils and
mouth were out of water. It seemed to be enjoying its bath, as it
actively glided, turned, and curved in that wonderful fashion which
Ruskin described as ‘a bit one way, a bit another, and some of him not
at all.’ There could be no hold for the scutæ in this case, nor could
I detect any action of the ribs as in crawling over a less smooth
surface. The creature seemed to move by its easy sinuations, and with
no more effort than you see in the fish at an aquarium. Perfectly
incomprehensible is this lax and leisurely movement in shallow
water. Even the inert little slow-worm astonishes us by its physical
achievements, which will be duly described in its especial chapter.</p>

<p>But among the most characteristically active are the small and slender
tree snakes, the <i>Dryadidæ</i> and <i>Dendrophidæ</i>, mostly of a brilliant
green. These and the Whip snakes are exceedingly long and slender,
the tails of many of them very gradually diminishing to a fine and
attenuated point. Some of them are closely allied to the lizards, and
skim and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">[219]</a></span> dash through the foliage with a scarcely perceptible weight.
These are the true acrobats, full of gracile ease and activity. Many
are over four feet in length, and not much thicker than a pencil.</p>

<p>They are found in the hot countries of both hemispheres. The Siamese
call some of them ‘sunbeams,’ from their combination of grace and
splendour, and in Brazil some have the brilliant tints of the
humming-birds. These little creatures in your hand feel like soft,
fine, satin cords endowed with life.</p>

<p>Dr. Wucherer, writing from Brazil, enthusiastically declared that he
was always delighted to find one of them in his garden. He discovered
them coiled in a bird’s nest, their body of two feet long occupying a
space no larger than the hollow of your hand. ‘In an instant they dart
upwards between the branches and over the leaves, which scarcely bend
beneath their weight. A moment more, and you have lost them.’<a name="FNanchor_70_70" id="FNanchor_70_70"></a><a href="#Footnote_70_70" class="fnanchor">[70]</a></p>

<p>Krefft, of Australia, had some of the active snakes, which were
confined in an empty room, but one day could not be found. At last they
were discovered upon the moulding of a door, nine feet from the floor!
They must have climbed up the smooth wood-work in their own mysterious
fashion.</p>

<p>Ere concluding this chapter, one slight exception to the extremely
‘simple’ spinal column must be named. This is that certain families,
more nearly allied to the lizards, or most far removed from the vipers,
have rudiments of pelvic bones, or those which in bipeds connect the
legs with the trunk. In a few families there is even a pair of these
rudiments externally, though only in the form of a spur or<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_220" id="Page_220">[220]</a></span> claw, as
seen in the boa constrictor, the pythons, and some of the blindworms,
and usually more developed in the male.</p>

<p>There is, however, the true skeleton of a claw beneath the skin,
composed of several bones, and presenting somewhat the form of a bird’s
claw, hinting at the common ancestry between snakes and lizards. These
spurs, though mere vestiges of limbs, must still be of some use to the
large constrictors when climbing trees and hanging from the branches.
They are found in the boa, python, eryx, and tortrix, four groups
which approach the lizard characteristics; also in <i>Boa aquatica</i>, the
anaconda.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-040.jpg" width="200" height="273"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">[221]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-027.jpg" width="500" height="106"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XIII.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>FRESH-WATER SNAKES.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">THE frequent allusion to water snakes in the preceding chapters seems
to render this a suitable place to describe them more in detail; and
among them are of course the sea snakes, and ‘The Great Sea Serpent’
must not be omitted.</p>

<p>In many books on natural history, particularly if herpetology occupy
any space, we find the subject wound up with a chapter on ‘The Sea
Serpent,’ forming a sort of apologetic little addendum, as if the
creature of questionable existence must claim no space in the heart of
the volume, yet is not quite so unimportant as to be omitted altogether.</p>

<p>On the part of some other authors, a total and summary dismissal of the
‘monster’ is apt to exclude with it any reference to the smaller sea
snakes, whose actual existence is therefore a fact less known than it
should be; and many persons, seeing the doubt cast upon the celebrated
individual whose reputed reappearance on the prorogation of Parliament<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">[222]</a></span>
has become an annual joke, conclude that all sea snakes are similarly
mythical.</p>

<p>Admitting it to be a dubious creature, with neither name nor
ancestry in ophidian annals, I must not give it precedence of the
recognised water snakes; but it shall figure in the heart of my book
notwithstanding.</p>

<p>‘<i>Fresh-water snakes</i>’ form the fourth, and ‘<i>Sea snakes</i>’ the fifth
of the five groups into which Dr. Günther has separated the ophidian
families; but the gradations between the land and the fresh-water
species, and between the latter and the salt-water snakes or the true
<i>Hydrophidæ</i>, are, like all other herpetological features, extremely
close. There are water-loving land snakes and land-frequenting water
snakes, that is, those which are equally at home in both. In the
true water species, however, we find modifications of ordinary rules
which show them to be peculiarly protected and adapted for an aquatic
existence.</p>

<p>One notable characteristic in all, both salt-water and fresh, is the
position of the nostrils on the top of the snout, and in many these are
protected by a valve which closes at will. As air-breathing animals
they must come to the surface, but the timid, stealthy ophidian
instinct which seeks to hide from observation can be indulged even
in the water, with the nostrils so situated that only a very small
surface of the head need be exposed. Could we examine the interior
of the mouth we should doubtless find some slight variation in the
position of the glottis also. In a foregoing chapter we saw that the
trachea opens exactly opposite to and close behind what Dumeril calls
the ‘arrière-narines;’ ‘leur glotte qui est à deux lèvres et qui
represente un larynx très simple,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">[223]</a></span> s’ouvre dans la bouche derrière
le fourreau de la langue ... elle s’élève pour se presenter dilatée
sous les arrière-narines.’<a name="FNanchor_71_71" id="FNanchor_71_71"></a><a href="#Footnote_71_71" class="fnanchor">[71]</a> The glottis of water snakes must have a
still more upward direction to present itself to those air passages.
Perhaps water snakes do not require to yawn so frequently as is the
habit of their terrestrial relatives; and if they do, it must be a rare
privilege to be able to inspect the process, as one can so frequently
do with the pythons and vipers at home. Our authorities do not give us
much information on this point.<a name="FNanchor_72_72" id="FNanchor_72_72"></a><a href="#Footnote_72_72" class="fnanchor">[72]</a></p>

<p>Their moderately long tapering tail is used as a propelling power.
Exteriorly, too, water snakes have smooth non-imbricated scales, though
exceptions exist in those species which frequent both land and water,
as the <i>Tropidonoti</i>, a large family of which our common English ring
snake is a member, and which, as their name denotes, have all keeled
scales, from τρόπις, τρόπιδος, <i>a keel</i>. These, also, can elevate
their ribs, and so flatten the body in the water, another assistant in
swimming.</p>

<p>A marked exception to the smooth-scaled, water-loving snakes is the
African viper, known as the ‘River Jack’ from its partiality to water.
<i>Vipera rhinosceros</i>, from the spinous scales which have the appearance
of horns on its nose, is allied to those described in the 18th chapter.
Though<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">[224]</a></span> not strictly a water snake, it much frequents it, and glides
through it with ease, the more remarkable because, in common with those
other ‘horned vipers’ of Africa, it has a short, insignificant little
tail, which can be of little use as a propelling power. Altogether,
it is one of the ugliest and most ferocious-looking of the whole
serpent tribe, with a thick, heavy body, a dingy, rough exterior, and
strongly-carinated scales. Excepting in colour, and a more horizontal
inclination of its horns, it is not unlike the <i>V. nasicornis</i> of the
coloured illustration, chap. xviii.</p>

<p>While all the <i>Homalopsidæ</i> or true fresh-water snakes are innocent,
there are many other venomous kinds known as ‘water serpents,’ both
in Africa and America. For example, the ‘water viper,’ or ‘water
moccasin,’ <i>Cenchris piscivorus</i>, whose aquatic and fish-eating
propensities were described in the chapter on Tails. This ‘thorn-tail’
viper has not, however, the nostrils of the true fresh-water snakes or
<i>Homalopsidæ</i>. In Australia also are several poisonous species, known
vernacularly as ‘water snakes;’ but strictly speaking, and on the
authority of Günther, the true <i>Homalopsidæ</i> are all non-venomous.</p>

<p>To describe these more minutely from Günther, Krefft, and Dr. E.
Nicholson, ‘they have a body moderately cylindrical, a tail somewhat
compressed at the root, and more or less prehensile. Many of them have
a distinctly prehensile tail, by which they hold on to projecting
objects;’ and in times of storms and strong currents we can imagine
the importance of this security to them. Their eyes, though prominent,
are small, and thus less exposed to injury; and the nostrils, as
already stated, are on the upper surface of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">[225]</a></span> the head, and provided
with a valvule. Another peculiarity is that the last or back tooth of
the maxillary bone is a grooved fang, a transitional tooth between an
ordinary one and a fang; but there is no evidence of any poisonous
saliva connected with it. Indeed, as we may repeat, Dr. Günther
distinctly affirms that all the fresh-water snakes are harmless and
<i>thoroughly aquatic</i>, though a few are occasionally found on the
beach. They inhabit rivers and estuaries, feeding on fish, and rarely
coming to land; some of them frequent brackish waters, and even enter
the sea. These latter in their organization approach the true marine
serpents. One Indian example, <i>Hydrinus</i>, is semi-pelagic. They are all
viviparous, producing their young in the water; and they belong to the
tropical or semi-tropical regions. In Australia they are found only
in the far north; but in America some so-called ‘water snakes,’ which
spend most of their time in the water, frequent rivers which are frozen
over in winter, during which season they probably undergo hibernation
in holes near the banks.</p>

<p>Several of the older naturalists describe ‘water snakes’ in words which
leave us no doubt as to the <i>numbers</i>, though of their name we cannot
be so certain. Carver in 1796 mentioned some small islands near the
western end of Lake Erie, so infested with snakes that it was dangerous
to land upon them. It is impossible that any place can produce a
greater number of all kinds of snakes, particularly the ‘water snake,’
than this. He says: ‘The lake is covered near the banks of the islands
with the large pond lily, the leaves of which lie on the surface of the
water so thick as to cover it entirely for many acres together, and
on each of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">[226]</a></span> these lay wreaths of water snakes, amounting to myriads,
basking in the sun.’ A sight of the last century this. I have passed
over that part of Lake Erie and through the Detroit river, and remember
the islands and the water-lilies and other attractive objects, but
‘wreaths of water snakes’ were not of these.</p>

<p>Lawson, too, can assure us of their habitat, but not their name, and
his account is of worth chiefly to verify their swarming numbers. It is
possible that some of those which he describes are now extinct or very
rare. ‘Of water Snakes there are four sorts. The first is of the Horn
Snake’s Colour, though less.’ (This might be the young of the ‘water
moccasin,’ <i>Cenchris</i>, or <i>Trigonoceph. piscivorus</i>.) ‘The next is a
very long Snake, differing in Colour, and will make nothing to swim
over a River a League wide. They hang upon Birches and other Trees by
the Water Side. I had the Fortune once to have one of them leap into
my Boat as I was going up a narrow River. The Boat was full of Mats,
which I was glad to take out and so get rid of him. They are reckoned
poisonous. A third is much of an English Adder Colour, but always
frequents the Salts, and lies under the drift Seaweed, where they are
in Abundance, and are accounted mischievous when they bite. The last
is of a sooty, black Colour, and frequents Ponds and Ditches. What his
Qualities are, I cannot tell.’</p>

<p>Catesby is responsible for having called <i>Tropidonotus fasciatus</i>
‘the brown water viper,’ a stumbling-block to many ever since, much
confusion existing between this and the true ‘water viper,’ the
dangerous moccasin snake. Occasionally they are very dark. They are
rather thick<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_227" id="Page_227">[227]</a></span> and viperish-looking as well, but are perfectly harmless.</p>

<p>This is the snake to which almost this book owes its origin, the
specimens at the Zoological Gardens called ‘Moccasins’ tripping me up
at the outset, as my preface sets forth. Holbrooke describes it as
spending most of its time in the water, or about pond and river banks.
It swims rapidly, and hundreds may be seen darting in all directions
through the water. They are very common in the United States, and might
have formed the ‘wreathed myriads’ on Lake Erie formerly. In summer
they roost on the lower branches of trees, overhanging the water, like
<i>Trigonocephalus piscivorus</i>, the true ‘water moccasin,’ or ‘cotton
mouth.’ At the time of writing there are examples of both these at
the Gardens, the harmless ‘moccasin,’ a rather handsome snake, and
the venomous one (not there recognised as the well-known moccasin of
the United States), so nearly black that we can account for its being
occasionally called the ‘black water viper.’</p>

<p>It is probably <i>Tropidonotus</i> which Parker Gilmore describes as ‘water
vipers.’<a name="FNanchor_73_73" id="FNanchor_73_73"></a><a href="#Footnote_73_73" class="fnanchor">[73]</a> At Vincennes in Indiana, he says, ‘On the side where some
alder bushes grow in the water, I have seen, on a very warm and bright
day, such numbers of water vipers twined round the limbs and trunks
which margin the pond, that it would be almost impossible to wade a
yard without being within reach of one of them. They certainly have all
the appearance of being venomous; the inhabitants say, however, they
are harmless. They feed principally on fish, frogs, and small birds.’</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_228" id="Page_228">[228]</a></span></p>

<p>Of American water snakes, the anaconda deserves special mention. Of
it Seba says, ‘Ce serpent habite plus les eaux que les rochers;’ and
in its having the nostrils situated on the top of the head, and in
possessing some other features in common with the <i>Homalopsidæ</i>, we
are justified in calling it a water serpent, notwithstanding it is a
true constrictor. ‘Mother of waters,’ the aborigines of South America
call it. It is the <i>Boa aquatica</i> of Neuwied, and <i>Eunectes murinus</i>
of Wagler, the latter name being the one most frequently used by
modern herpetologists. Dumeril adopts it, <i>l’Eunect murin</i>, giving the
origin of the generic name, <i>bon nageur</i>, from the Greek εὐ, <i>bien</i>,
<i>fort</i>, and νηϰτής, <i>nageur</i>&mdash;<i>qui nage bien</i>. As to the meaning of the
specific name <i>murinus</i>, there can be but little doubt, though some
have attributed it to its mouse-coloured skin or spots. <i>Le mangeur de
rats</i>, Bonnat called it; <i>le rativoro</i>, Lacepède. Seba, who was one of
the first to describe it, says, ‘Il font guerre aux rats;’ and Bonnat,
on his authority, says, ‘Il se nourrit d’une espèce de rats.’ ‘Serpent
d’Amerique à moucheteur de tortue,’ Seba also describes it, and with
‘jolies écailles magnifiquement madrées de grandes taches, semblable de
celles des tortues; taches semées sans ordres, grands, petits,’ etc.
<i>Murinus</i>, therefore, clearly refers to its food, not its colour.</p>

<p>Dumeril’s description is of more scientific exactness: ‘Pas de
fossettes aux lèvres. On peut aisément reconnaitre les Eunectes seul
entre les boa, ils ont les narines percées à la face supérieure du bout
du museau et directement tournées vers le ciel.’ These, being extremely
small, and with a power to close hermetically, declare its aquatic
habits. Its eyes are prominent, and so placed that the reptile can<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">[229]</a></span> see
before it, and also below&mdash;that is, down into the waters.</p>

<p>On first sight it might be a matter of wonder that so large a serpent
should condescend to a meal of rats and mice; but to explain this we
must again go back to the early naturalists, when we discover that what
Seba called <i>le rat d’Amerique</i> was a rodent quite worth constricting
for dinner. Under the order <i>Muridæ</i> were included in those days a
number of the larger rodents, such as the Paca, <i>Mus Braziliensis</i>; the
Coypu, <i>Mus coypus</i>; <i>Myopotamus</i>, the Capybara; the Murine opossum,
and several others, aquatic in their habits, and large enough to
attract the ‘Giant of the Waters.’</p>

<p>From the vernacular <i>Matatoro</i>, or ‘Bull killer,’ also a whole century
of misrepresentations have arisen, the said ‘bull’ being really as
small in proportion as the ‘rats’ and ‘mice’ were large. ‘The deer
swallower’ is another of its local titles, showing that it is a serpent
of varying tastes. Stories are told of this ‘monster’ killing itself
in attempting to gorge large animals with enormously extended horns,
animals not to be found among the Brazilian fauna; and familiar to
most persons are the illustrations of anacondas of untraceable length,
the posterior portion coiled round a branch fifty feet high, and the
anterior coiled round a bull as big as a prize ox. These illustrations
are the offspring of ignorance rather than reality, and though
occasionally <i>Eunectes</i> might come to grief by attacking a somewhat
unmanageable meal, yet its recognised specific, <i>murinus</i> or <i>murina</i>,
points more clearly the true nature of its food, viz. rodents of at
most some two feet long.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_230" id="Page_230">[230]</a></span></p>

<p>No less exaggerated than its appetite is its length. Possibly anacondas
may have attained greater size formerly when there were fewer enemies
than at present, if it be true, as some have affirmed, that serpents
grow all their lives. Thirty feet is the utmost length on record.
Wallace affirms that he has never seen one exceeding twenty feet. Those
individuals at the Zoological Gardens have rarely exceeded this, and
Günther gives twenty-two feet as their average length in the present
day.</p>

<p>Of those known in South Africa as ‘water snakes,’ one is <i>Avusamans</i>
vernacularly, a black one and common, and another, <i>Iffulu</i>, of a
beautiful bright green. Mr. Woodward, whose scientific egg-sucker
has been already mentioned in chap. iii., states that both these are
poisonous, that he never saw the green one out of water, and that
it is unsafe to bathe where they are. On referring to Dr. Andrew
Smith’s <i>Zoology of South Africa</i>, I am not able to identify these
with certainty, and do not, therefore, give the above as scientific
information.</p>

<p>But before concluding this part of the subject, I would add a word or
two on the importance of an accurate description of the snake, as far
as possible, when one is found in some unusual situation; because a
snake being found in the water is no proof that it is a water snake, or
even that it was there by choice. Livingstone, in his <i>Expedition to
the Zambesi</i>, p. 150, describes the number of venomous creatures, such
as scorpions, centipedes, etc., that were found on board, ‘having been
brought into the ship with wood.’ ‘Snakes also came sometimes with the
wood, but oftener floated down the river to us, climbing easily by the
chain<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_231" id="Page_231">[231]</a></span> cable. Some poisonous ones were caught in the cabin. A green one
was there several weeks, hiding in the daytime.’</p>

<p>Often in newspapers are stories of ‘sea snakes’ as having appeared
quite out of their geographical range. These on investigation may
reasonably be traced to land snakes which have been carried out by the
tidal rivers. In <i>Land and Water</i> of Jan. 5, 1878, was such a story.
Again, March 31, the following year, a correspondent, ‘J. J. A.,’ on
‘Animal Life in New Caledonia,’ stated that the sea inside the reefs
is sometimes covered with both dead and living creatures carried out
by the violence of the currents after heavy rains. ‘The flooded rivers
rush with great force from the mountains,’ and numbers of reptiles were
among the victims of that force. He saw ‘incredible numbers of snakes,’
and described the common sea snakes as ‘stupid, fearless things, that
will not get out of your way.... The small sand-islands are literally
alive with them.’ The writer made no pretensions to be a naturalist, or
to state confidently what the snakes were specifically. New Caledonia
would seem to be rather beyond the range of sea snakes proper, and
those ‘incredible numbers’ may have been only land snakes involuntarily
taking a sea bath, or certain species frequenting brackish waters, like
those in South Carolina described by Lawson.</p>

<p>About the same time an American newspaper contained an account given
by Captain O. A. Pitfield, of the steamship <i>Mexico</i>, who stated that
he had ‘passed through a tangled mass of snakes’ off the Tortuga
islands, at the entrance to the Gulf of Mexico. The ship was ‘more
than<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">[232]</a></span> an hour’ in passing them. ‘They were of all sizes, from the
ordinary green water snake of two feet long, to monsters, genuine “sea
serpents,” of fourteen to fifteen feet in length.’ I replied to both
these communications at the time (<i>Land and Water</i>, April 5, 1879),
inviting further information, and describing the features by which
true water and true sea snakes could be easily distinguished. Nothing
further appeared on the subject, and I have little doubt but that, in
both cases, the ‘shoals of sea snakes’ were land species that had been
merely carried out to sea by force of rivers. I have since been more
strongly inclined to this opinion on learning from Dr. Stradling that
similar transportations of snakes occur through the force of some of
the South American rivers. ‘Do you know the snakes which belong to the
River Plate proper?’ he asks me by letter. ‘So many are brought down by
floods from Paraguay&mdash;even the big constrictors&mdash;that it is difficult
to determine from occasional specimens.’</p>

<p>I could not, unfortunately, refer to any books that afforded much
information on this subject; for amongst the greatest literary needs
experienced by an ophiologist is some complete and special work on
the South American snakes, corresponding with Günther’s <i>Reptiles of
British India</i>, and Krefft’s <i>Snakes of Australia</i>.</p>

<p>Other writers have mentioned the occurrence of boa constrictors and
anacondas far out at sea occasionally, beguiling the unsophisticated
into reporting a veritable ‘sea serpent’ to the <i>Times</i> by the first
homeward-bound mail.</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">[233]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-041.jpg" width="500" height="101"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XIV.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE PELAGIC OR SEA SNAKES.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">THE modifications of ordinary forms which are seen in the fresh-water
snakes are still more beautifully developed in the <i>Hydrophidæ</i>, or
true marine serpents. The former, being never out of easy reach of
shore, could easily find a safe harbour from violent torrents, in holes
in the banks or among the strong aquatic weeds along the borders of
lakes and rivers; and to be enabled to hold on to these in times of
danger or of repose, they possess a prehensile power of tail. In a
rough and stormy ocean, a much more powerful propeller and rudder would
be necessary for the guidance of the reptile, and to afford resistance
against the denser medium of sea water; therefore the tail of sea
snakes is not only prehensile but strongly compressed, so as to almost
form a vertical fin, answering altogether to that of a fish. This is
their most conspicuous and striking feature, and one that would leave
no doubt in the mind of the observer between the true marine and those
fresh-water species which may by accident drift out to sea by force of
current.</p>

<p>Another distinguishing feature is the absence of ventral<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">[234]</a></span> scales in
most of the species. In land snakes we saw how admirably adapted are
the broad, ventral plates for assisting those reptiles over rough
surfaces, as affording hold; but the <i>Hydrophidæ</i> requiring no such aid
in a fluid, those scutæ would be useless; they are therefore, excepting
in one or two species, entirely absent, or but slightly developed, and
the belly is ridged instead, like the keel of a boat.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-234.jpg" width="150" height="282"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="p150">Portion of the under side of a sea snake, above and
below the anus, with no distinction in tail scales.</p>
</div></div>

<p>The nostrils are small, placed horizontally on the top of the snout,
as in the <i>Homalopsidæ</i>, and in most of the sea snakes they are
contiguous. They are, moreover, furnished with a valve, which is under
control of the will, opening to admit air, and closing to exclude water
when diving. For, be it remembered, these marine reptiles breathe
through their nostrils even more entirely than terrestrial snakes, the
latter being better able to indulge their yawning propensities, or to
occasionally respire slightly, and through parted lips and the tongue
chink as well. Sea snakes, on the contrary, not requiring the continual
use of their tongue to feel and explore surroundings, and not using
it below water, are not provided with the little centre chink for its
exsertion; but the middle plate of the upper lip, <i>i.e.</i> the ‘rostral
shield’ (see illus. p. 238), is altogether of a different form. Indeed,
the centre plates or shields in both lips are conspicuously modified,
the upper one often inclining downwards in a point which fits into the
lower one shaped to receive it, so that the mouth is firmly closed
to keep out the water. Less required, the tongue is shorter and less
developed, the tips are less hair-like,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">[235]</a></span> as only these, if at all,
are exposed to the sea water, and a very small notch on each side of
the pointed rostral shield of some permits the slight egress of these
tips. When out of their natural element, the tongue is brought into
more active service, for then the bewildered reptiles require its
assistance, and it is then seen to be exserted as in land snakes. Their
lungs extend the whole length of the body to the anus, and by retaining
a large supply of air, these animals are enabled to float easily, as
they do for a long while on the surface of the calm tropical seas, not
only while sleeping, as mentioned in the chapter on hibernation, but in
pure enjoyment, and probably in the lazy <i>postprandial</i> condition.</p>

<p>As has been already stated, the eyes of sea snakes are adapted to
see better through the medium of water than through the brilliant
atmosphere of their native latitudes. They are very small, and soon
blinded by light; consequently, though among the swiftest and most
gracile of serpents in their native element, the movements of the
<i>Hydrophidæ</i> on land are uncertain and ‘maladroit.’</p>

<p>Some forty years ago, Dr. Theodore Cantor, F.Z.S., devoted a good deal
of time to the study of the pelagic serpents, and wrote a somewhat
detailed account of them to the Zoological Society. His paper,
published in the <i>Zoological Society Transactions</i>, 1842, vol. ii., was
considered the most important that had as yet appeared. He, therefore,
has been one of our first authorities. Subsequently we are indebted to
Günther, Dr. E. Nicholson, Gerard Krefft, and Sir Joseph Fayrer for the
results of their individual observations.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">[236]</a></span> In my foregoing descriptions
I have culled from each of these, and as most modern writers on this
subject merely reproduce from the works of Günther, Cantor, and Fayrer,
I will keep chiefly to these in what further has to be said of sea
snakes.</p>

<p>First, they belong to the tropical seas of the Eastern hemisphere,
and are most numerous in the Indian Ocean, where they abound. The
geographical range of a few is, however, somewhat extensive, viz. from
Madagascar and that part of the African coast to northern Australia,
the Bay of Bengal, and even to the western coasts of Panama; while
others are restricted to certain localities. All are highly venomous.
They are wild and ferocious as well, and therefore peculiarly
dangerous, and are the great dread of fishermen, who carefully avoid
them. Accidents, nevertheless, frequently happen through their being
caught in the nets, when, from their exceeding activity, it is
difficult to disengage them and set them free again. When out of the
water they try to bite at the nearest objects, and being dazzled by the
light, strike wildly, unable to aim correctly. Cantor informs us that
he has known them to turn and strike their own bodies in their rage,
and that he has found difficulty in disengaging their fangs and teeth
from their own flesh.</p>

<p>Owing to the great danger attending their capture, and also the almost
impossibility of keeping them alive when out of the sea, less is
accurately known of the pelagic than most other snakes. Even if placed
in a large hole in the ground filled with sea water, or a capacious
tank similarly supplied, they die very rapidly. Sir Joseph Fayrer
in his experiments resorted to every means in order to keep them<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">[237]</a></span>
alive, but informs us that their exceeding delicacy caused their rapid
death in spite of the utmost care. Dr. Vincent Richards, however, has
succeeded in keeping some alive several weeks.</p>

<p>In length they vary from two to ten feet. Krefft says that the largest
he ever saw was nine feet long. Günther states that they sometimes
attain twelve feet, and sea snakes of even fourteen feet in length have
been occasionally reported, though not perhaps from well authenticated
sources. It is probable that, like all other reptiles, they attain
their greatest proportions in the hottest regions.</p>

<p>Though purely oceanic, and no more found in fresh water than on dry
ground, yet they come some distance up the rivers as far as brackish
water. When washed on shore by the surf, they are helpless and blind,
and at such times ‘peaceable,’ by reason of their helplessness.
Occasionally they are seen coiled up asleep on the beach, where they
have probably been washed by the tide, and where the next tide will no
doubt release them from their uncongenial bed. Those species which have
a less keeled body and the partially developed ventral scales might
even manage to get back to sea independently of the tide. Even those
without ventral scales contrive to wriggle along in their own fashion.</p>

<p>Such an occurrence is related by Mr. E. H. Pringle in the <i>Field</i>
newspaper of 3d September 1881. He tracked an <i>Enhydrina</i> fifty feet
along the sands, making its way back to the sea from a salt-water pool,
where it had probably been left by the tide. This species is the one
peculiarly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">[238]</a></span> favoured in having tiny orifices for the egress of the
tongue tips on each side of its lobulated snout.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-238.jpg" width="200" height="100"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc"><i>Enhydrina.</i> From Fayrer’s<br /><i>Thanatophidia</i>.</p>
</div></div>

<p>Its profile, being somewhat remarkable, is here presented to the
reader, who will perhaps detect a certain determination in that very
beak-like snout. This species is found along the Burman coast. Another,
though keeping to its native element, has explored the Pacific to the
very borders of America, and has been seen on the western coast of
Panama. This is <i>Pelamis bicolor</i>, of distinct black and yellow, like
a striped satin ribbon. The back is black, and the belly brown or
yellowish, and its rather short, flat tail is spotted with a bluish
colour as well. None of his relatives venture so far from the oriental
islands as <i>Pelamis</i>. His presence as far north as New Caledonia has
not, that I am aware of, been authoritatively recorded; we cannot
suggest, therefore, the probability of ‘J. J. A.’s’ sea snakes, ‘stupid
and fearless,’ being ‘incredible numbers’ of the <i>Pelamis</i> family. Dr.
Stradling affirms that they are ‘not unfrequently met with along the
eastern coast of South America, and that one found its way on board the
royal mail steamship <i>Douro</i>, and concealed itself under the covering
of the patent lead, having probably climbed up the quarter line as she
lay made fast to the wharf at Santos.’<a name="FNanchor_74_74" id="FNanchor_74_74"></a><a href="#Footnote_74_74" class="fnanchor">[74]</a></p>

<p>Some slight controversy on the possibility of <i>Pelamis</i> ‘climbing’
followed this statement. But Mr. F. Buckland also recorded one ‘which
crawled up the anchor-chain of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_239" id="Page_239">[239]</a></span> a man-of-war, when she was moored in
the mouth of the Ganges. The midshipman of the watch saw something
moving along the chain, and without thinking went to pick it up, when
it turned upon him, and bit him. The poor young midshipman did not live
many hours after the accident’ (<i>Land and Water</i>, Nov. 15, 1879).</p>

<p>In the same issue the writer described one which was caught in the
telegraph wire of the Eastern Extension Telegraph Company. One of the
cables was being raised, and when it came to the surface, the snake
was found coiled tightly round it. <i>Hydrophis</i> was here exercising his
prehensile powers, not understanding the reason of the violent motion.
Snakes, as has been already affirmed, are not restricted in their
acrobatic achievements; so that even sea snakes, not naturally either
climbers or crawlers, can do both on an occasion.</p>

<p>The more interesting question regarding Dr. Stradling’s cable climber
is, was it a true <i>Pelamis</i>, or one of the <i>Hydrophidæ</i> at all? If so,
it was more likely to be an entirely distinct species from those of the
oriental seas. Either Cape Horn or the Cape of Good Hope would be far
too southward for their range, they being essentially tropical. When
Panama comes to be severed by water communication, some enterprising
<i>Pelamis</i> or <i>Enhydrina</i> may find its way through, and get down even to
Santos; but at present, as Dr. Stradling did not <i>see</i> the snake, but
only <i>heard</i> of it, the evidence of the presence of <i>Hydrophidæ</i> on the
eastern coast of South America cannot be fully established.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_240" id="Page_240">[240]</a></span></p>

<div class="floatright">

     <img src="images/ill-240.jpg" width="150" height="286"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Sea snakes’ scales.<br />From the <i>Thanatophidia</i>.</p>
</div></div>

<p>A further facility to their agile and graceful movements in the water
are their smooth, non-imbricated, or only slightly imbricated scales.
These, though mostly hexagonal, and laid side by side, different from
those of land snakes, yet vary much in size and form; and the head
shields particularly are so abnormal, that, as Günther affirms, you can
tell a sea snake at once by them (see illustrations, chap. xviii.).</p>

<p>To distinguish a pelagic from a fresh-water snake is, however, far
easier than to distinguish species among themselves. They present great
varieties of form and colour, but the transitions are very gradual,
and the female is generally larger than the male, and sometimes of a
different colour, which adds to the difficulty.</p>

<p>They are all viviparous, and produce their young in the water, where
the little ones are at once able to take care of themselves, and feed
on small fish or molluscs. The full-grown <i>Hydrophidæ</i> feed on fish
corresponding with their own dimensions, and swallowed head foremost.
Even spiny fish are managed by them, notwithstanding that they have a
smaller jaw than most land snakes. Being killed by the poison of the
bite on being caught, Günther explains, the muscles of the fish are
relaxed, and the prey being commenced at the head, the armature does
not interfere, but folds back flat as the fish is gradually drawn into
the jaws.</p>

<p>An interesting study to the lover of nature it is to watch the
wonderful movements of these sea reptiles. Swimming and diving with
equal facility, flashing into sight and disappearing again in twos or
scores, or in large shoals,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">[241]</a></span> pursuing fish, many of them of bright
colouring, they offer constant amusement to the beholder. Sometimes,
when the sailors are throwing their nets, they disappear beneath the
waves, and are no longer seen for half an hour or more; when presently,
far away from the spot where they vanished so suddenly, up they come to
the surface again, to sport once more, or take in a fresh supply of air.</p>

<p>Pity they possess such evil qualities to blind us to their beauties,
for they rank among the most venomous of serpents. They belong to the
sub-order of venomous colubrine snakes, or <i>Ophidia colubriformes
Venenosi</i>, those which outwardly have the aspect of harmless snakes,
while yet furnished with poison fangs. In the chapter on Dentition,
these distinctions, facilitated by the illustrations, are more fully
explained; here it need only be said that though they have smaller
jaws and shorter fangs than many other venomous snakes of their size,
the virus is plentiful, and so active that the danger from the bite is
great. All the pelagic serpents have also a few simple teeth behind
the fangs; therefore, as Fayrer warns the natives, it does not do to
trust to the <i>appearance</i> of the wound, which, though looking like the
bite of a harmless snake, would demand immediate remedies. A certain
conviction of danger is that the bite being inflicted in salt water,
would leave no doubt as to the nature of the snake. Even a painless
wound it is not safe to trust; and Sir Joseph Fayrer gives several such
warnings among his cases of bite from sea snakes, two of which I will
quote.</p>

<p>Captain S&mdash;&mdash;, while bathing in a tidal river, felt what he thought was
the pinch of a crab on his leg, but took no<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">[242]</a></span> notice of it, and after
his bath called on some friends, being to all appearance exceedingly
well. He remained about an hour, playing the concertina to amuse the
children, and declaring himself never in better health. In about two
hours, feeling strange symptoms of suffocation, enlargement of the
tongue, and a rigidity of muscles, he sent for a doctor, but still
having no suspicion of danger. The next morning a native detected
the peculiar symptoms which usually follow the bite of a sea snake;
and Captain S&mdash;&mdash;, then examining the foot which the supposed crab
had nipped, found marks of fangs no bigger than mosquito bites on
the tendon Achilles near the ankle. Immediate steps were taken, and
remedies applied which seemed to promise favourable results for a time;
but in the evening of the third day the victim was seized with spasms,
and died, seventy-one hours after the accident. In this case, owing to
the sound health of the captain, and no local pain ensuing to warn him,
together with the stimulants and remedies applied, and the bite being
where absorption was slow, his death was protracted; otherwise death
often occurs within twenty-four hours from that species of snake.<a name="FNanchor_75_75" id="FNanchor_75_75"></a><a href="#Footnote_75_75" class="fnanchor">[75]</a></p>

<p>The second case was that of a man who was bitten in the finger by a sea
snake, and thinking lightly of it, used no means whatever to arrest the
poison, and was dead in four hours.</p>

<p>In some cases the victim becomes quickly insensible, when, if no aid is
near, he never wakes to consciousness. Immediate stimulants revive the
patient, and if he can be kept awake, these, with local applications,
<i>at once applied</i>,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_243" id="Page_243">[243]</a></span> may save his life. ‘Hope itself is a powerful
stimulant,’ adds the learned experimentalist.</p>

<p>Many other cases are given by Fayrer of bites by sea snakes, some of
which yielded to remedies and others were fatal; but for these the
reader is referred to the <i>Thanatophidia</i>.</p>

<p>Dr. Cantor had previously made many experiments on various dumb
creatures in order to ascertain the virulence of the poison of these
hitherto unstudied reptiles. He found that a fowl died in violent
spasms eight minutes after a bite; and a second fowl, bitten directly
afterwards by the same snake, with its half-exhausted venom, in ten
minutes. Fish died in ten minutes; a tortoise in twenty-eight minutes,
from the bite of another species; and a harmless snake was paralyzed
within half an hour.</p>

<p>Among the fresh-water snakes, Dr. Günther tells us of one, <i>Hydrinus</i>,
which is semi-pelagic, and which indulges in little excursions down the
rivers to exchange greetings with his marine relatives, some of whom,
on their part, occasionally go a certain distance up the rivers. Again,
among the sea snakes is one who rambles for change of air or diversity
of diet over the fields and far away. In him, Dr. Günther describes one
of those many transitions found in every class and order throughout
nature. <i>Platurus</i> is his name; he has the ventral scales of land
snakes to enable him to wander over the salt water marshes which he
loves. His nostrils are on the side of his head instead of on the top,
and his head shields differ from those of all his relatives. His venom
fangs are small, and his tail is not prehensile, presenting the united
characters of fresh and salt water and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">[244]</a></span> land snakes. Thus we have links
between sea and land snakes, between fresh water and salt, and between
these latter and fishes, for in many instances the affinities are so
close that naturalists have doubted in which class to place them.
When that remarkable animal, the <i>Lepidosiren</i>, which Darwin calls a
living fossil, was first brought from Africa some thirty years ago,
it was found to present so many characteristics in common with both
reptiles and fishes, that it was for some time a mooted question in
which class to place it. In appearance it more resembles the former,
with its four curious filamentary limbs, which Owen considers ‘the
beginnings of organs which attain full functional development in the
higher vertebrates.’ The same high authority has decided that the
only character which absolutely distinguishes fishes from reptiles,
so closely are some of them allied, is whether or not there is an
open passage from the nostrils to the mouth; and the ‘Lepidosiren’ is
now known as ‘the mud-fish of the Gambia,’ the ichthyic characters
predominating.</p>

<p>Sea snakes were not unknown to the ancients. Aristotle mentions
them (Taylor’s Translation, 1812, Book ii. vol. 6), ‘Of sanguineous
animals, however, there remains the genus of serpents. But they partake
of the nature both of terrestrial and aquatic animals. For most of
them are terrestrial, and not a few are aquatic, and which live in
potable water. There are also marine serpents similar in form to the
terrestrial genus, except that their head more resembles that of a
conger. There are, however, many genera of marine serpents, and they
are an all-various colour; but they are not generated in very deep
places.’</p>

<p>These latter words suggest what has not been mentioned<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">[245]</a></span> as a positive
fact, while yet in part it is corroborated by Cantor, who tells us
that the young sea snakes feed on soft-shelled molluscs; we may argue,
therefore, that the mother snakes come into shallow water to give
birth to their young, where small fish and suitable food may abound.
Aristotle was evidently aware of the distinctions between fresh and
salt water snakes, and gives us the former as frequenting rivers
(‘potable waters’).</p>

<p>The Greek mariners who frequented the tropical seas knew of the
poisonous snakes with wholesome dread. Sir Emerson Tennant tells us
that the fishermen on the west coast of Ceylon are still in perpetual
fear of them. They say there are some with the head hooded like the
cobra, that coil themselves up like serpents on land, not only biting
with their teeth, but ‘crushing their prey in their coils.’</p>

<p>The ‘hood’ part of the story is not borne out by any scientific writer;
and as for the ‘crushing in coils,’ the sailors may possibly mistake
the prehensile actions of holding on&mdash;even to a large fish&mdash;possibly
for the action of crushing in the way of constricting. In
self-protection, or for safety, venomous serpents do entwine themselves
pretty tightly round an object sometimes. An instance of this was just
now given. But constricting for the purpose of killing is happily
confined to the non-venomous families. It would indeed be terrible if
the ‘giants of the waters’ could both constrict and bite with poison
fang; and of this a word or two will be said in the following chapter.
Admittedly but little has been accurately ascertained about the marine
serpents in comparison with the terrestrial ones. And there really<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">[246]</a></span>
may be species hitherto unobserved. The great sea serpent question is
not yet satisfactorily settled; and among the lesser kind, the true
pelagians, varieties are frequently occurring. Krefft describes one in
the Australian Museum which, not being like any other that he had seen,
he sets down as a new type. Forty-eight distinct species were described
by Cantor. The whole family comprises seven genera, four of which
belong to the Indian Ocean.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-128.jpg" width="200" height="199"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">[247]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-059.jpg" width="500" height="110"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XV.</h2>

<p class="pch">‘<i>THE GREAT SEA SERPENT.</i>’</p>

<p class="drop-cap04">THE question of varieties and of constriction brings us to ‘The Great
Sea Serpent;’ for, putting all the evidence together, if the creature
exist at all he must be a constrictor.</p>

<p>I do not intend to trouble my readers with the detailed history of this
great unknown, for his literature would more than exceed the limits of
this whole volume. Those who are sufficiently interested in him will
find ample reading in most of the encyclopedias, which again refer
us to various books in which he has figured from his first supposed
appearance in modern times.</p>

<p>Ever and again, when a new ‘sea monster’ has been reported, the
newspapers take up the theme, and often give a <i>resumé</i> of its history,
from Bishop Pontoppidan’s down to the most recent specimen. References
to the most important of the journalistic authorities usually accompany
the more detailed accounts; but among them an excellent abridgement of
‘sea serpent’ literature, which appeared in the <i>Illustrated London
News</i> of October 1848, is worth studying. Another of interest was in
the <i>Echo</i> of January 15, 1877. In <i>Silliman’s<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_248" id="Page_248">[248]</a></span> Journal of Science</i>,
1835, was also an excellent paper. One of the best digests is that
given by P. H. Gosse, in his <i>Romance of Natural History</i>, of the ed.
1860. This author, after weighing all the published evidence both from
ordinary and scientific sources, and presenting it in a well-arranged
and lucid form, sums up as follows:&mdash;</p>

<p>‘In conclusion, I express my own confident persuasion that there exists
some oceanic animal of immense proportions, which has not yet been
received into the category of scientific zoology; and my strong opinion
that it possesses close affinities with the fossil <i>enaliosauria</i> of
the lias.’</p>

<p>Having respect for the opinion of so thoughtful a writer, and further
encouraged by the fact that some of our most eminent physiologists have
not thought it beneath them to give their attention to the various
serpentine appearances which from time to time are seen at sea, and
that the majority of them believe in the possibility of an unknown
marine reptile, let us accept this idea as the basis of an endeavour to
lay before my readers another summing up of evidence gathered from the
still more recent writings on ‘The Great Sea Serpent’ of modern times.</p>

<p>Those who have honoured this book with attentive perusal thus far,
will have become initiated in certain ophidian manners, actions, and
appearances which would enable them at once to identify a snake were
they to have a complete view of one. But to those who are not familiar
with such peculiarities, and possess only a vague idea of the ophidian
form, many a merely elongated outline at sea may be, and has been,
set down as a ‘serpent,’ which on closer inspection, or by the light
of science, has proved something entirely different.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_249" id="Page_249">[249]</a></span> Ribbon-fish,
strings of porpoises and other cetaceans, long lines of sea-birds on
the surface of the waves, even logs of drifting wood or bamboo, with
bunches of seaweed doing service as ‘manes’ or ‘fins,’ have in turn,
and by the aid of the imagination, been dubbed ‘the sea serpent’
again and again. These may be dismissed by the mere mention of a few
such as examples. For instance, in <i>Nature</i>, vol. xviii., 1878, Dr.
Dean describes a reported ‘sea serpent,’ which resolved itself into
a flight of birds. E. H. Pringle describes the serpentine appearance
of a bamboo swaying up and down, which at a distance had deceived the
beholders into the idea of the sea serpent; others explained that long
lines of birds or of sea-weeds had again similarly deceived sailors. In
<i>Land and Water</i>, Sept. 22, 1877, we read that the crew of the barque
<i>Aberfoyle</i>, off the coast of Scotland, thought they really had got
one this time, and approaching the ‘monster,’ lowered and manned a
boat, and seized a harpoon to ‘catch’ the singularly passive creature,
which proved to be a mass of ‘a sort of jelly-fish description,’
some of which they bottled and corked down air-tight; but, alas! it
‘deliquesced’!</p>

<p>Again, in <i>Nature</i>, Feb. 10, 1881, an imaginary sea serpent seen from
the <i>City of Baltimore</i> (a ship in which the present writer crossed the
Atlantic, though unfortunately not on that voyage) was pronounced to be
a species of whale, the <i>Zeuglodontia</i>.</p>

<p>One more out of scores of similar reports, which go to show that if
some unknown marine animal of a longish form is caught, those who
have anything to do with it immediately label it ‘the sea serpent.’
In <i>Land and Water</i>, Aug. 24, 1878, Mr. Frank Buckland published a
communication<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_250" id="Page_250">[250]</a></span> from an Australian correspondent, regarding a ‘most
remarkable fish,’ of nearly fifteen feet long, and eight inches in
diameter at the thickest part. It has ‘no scales,’ but ‘a skin like
polished silver,’ is of a tapering form, has a very queer mouth,
a ‘mane’ on the neck, and ‘two feelers under the chin, thirty-two
inches long.’ And this unsnake-like thing was taken to the Mechanics’
Institute of that town, and unhesitatingly. labelled ‘Sea Serpent!’ Dr.
Buckland suggested that it was a ribbon fish.</p>

<p>Thus, we may repeat that it is almost impossible for an unscientific
person even to <i>see</i>, far less to describe, unfamiliar living forms in
a manner that would prove sound data for zoologists to decide upon.</p>

<p>In a rather detailed communication to <i>Land and Water</i> on this subject,
by Dr. Andrew Wilson, September 15, 1877, he also reminds us how easily
and frequently we may trace supposed resemblances to animals or faces,
where none can possibly exist; as, for instance, ‘in the gnarled trunks
and branches of trees.’ Much more true resemblances to serpentine
forms are really seen at sea; as, for example, those ‘floating trunks
and roots of trees serving as a nucleus, around which sea-weed has
collected.’ In one instance, as Dr. Wilson relates, some such object,
seen from the deck of a yacht, was so deceptive even to intelligent men
who scrutinized it through the telescope, that the course of the ship
was changed on purpose to inspect it closely. Dr. Wilson regrets the
unfortunate discredit which has been cast upon all sea-serpent stories
through such erroneous observations, causing even the more trustworthy
accounts to be received with almost universal ridicule, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_251" id="Page_251">[251]</a></span> as already
observed in the opening of chap. xiii., almost to the ignoring of the
true sea snakes, which are too often included among the mythical.</p>

<p>Briefly to enumerate some of those which appear to have recently had
the chiefest claims to attention as really living creatures, otherwise
than flights of birds or shoals of fish, but making due allowance for
unscientific observations, and vague or exaggerated representations, we
find that gigantic marine animals were observed as follows:&mdash;</p>

<div class="pbq">

<p class="p1">1734. Off Greenland.</p>

<p>1740. Off Norway; described by Bishop Pontoppidan as 600 feet in</p>
<p>length.</p>

<p>1809. Off the Hebrides.</p>

<p>1815. Near Boston, U.S.</p>

<p>1817. Ditto.</p>

<p>1819. Ditto. From 80 to 250 yards in length!</p>

<p>1819. One seen for a month off Norway.</p>

<p>1822. Ditto; and again 600 feet long.</p>

<p>1827. Ditto.</p>

<p>1829. Mr. Davidson, surgeon, R.N., described one seen in the Indian
seas as precisely similar to that seen afterwards from the <i>Dædalus</i>
in 1848. He wrote of it during the controversy that passed regarding
the latter. Mr. Gosse regarded his testimony as of much value.</p>

<p>1833. One seen by five British officers off Halifax, and described by
P. H. Gosse.</p>

<p>1837. Again off Norway.</p>

<p>1846. Off Norway, and in the same locality as one seen about one
hundred years previously; also during the hottest part of the summer.
This individual had two ‘fins,’ and ‘the movements were like those of
a snake forty to fifty feet long.’</p>

<p>1848. The one seen from the <i>Dædalus</i>.</p>

<p>1850. Off Norway.</p>

<p>1851. Ditto.</p>

<p>1852. One described by Captain Steele, mentioned by Gosse.</p>

<p>1857. One described by Captain Harrison, and considered trustworthy
evidence.</p>

<p>1875. One seen from the <i>Pauline</i>, July 8, in lat. 5° 30´ S., long.
35° W. Also on July 13, ‘a similar serpent’ seen from the same barque
<i>Pauline</i>.</p>

<p>1875. September 11. ‘An enormous marine salamander’ in the Straits of
Malacca, seen from the <i>Nestor</i>.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_252" id="Page_252">[252]</a></span></p>

<p>1877. Large marine animal seen from the royal yacht <i>Osborne</i> off
Sicily.</p>

<p>1879. Colonel Leathes, of Herring Fleet Hall, Yarmouth, informs Mr.
F. Buckland of sea serpents seen from the <i>White Adder</i> off Aden, and
again off New Guinea and the Cape. (See <i>Land and Water</i>, Sept. 6,
1879.)</p>

</div>

<p class="p1">In the above list we are struck by the fact that the coast of Norway
and the northern seas <i>during the hottest weather</i> are the favourite
playgrounds of these gigantic marine animals, though as for the
‘600’ feet, we must first be assured of Norwegian measurement before
forming any estimate beyond that the creatures were doubtless of great
length. ‘Witnesses of unimpeachable character’ have produced so much
trustworthy evidence as far as Norway is concerned, that no doubt any
longer exists there as to ‘the’ or <i>a</i> ‘marine animal’ of enormous
length. ‘There is scarcely a sailor who has not seen one,’ it has been
broadly stated; and Norwegians wonder that English naturalists are so
sceptical on the subject.</p>

<p>Of still more marvellous proportions was the one seen off the American
coast in 1819, and which is vaguely described as from 80 to 250 yards!
That outdoes Norway altogether; but then, of course, an American sea
serpent <i>would</i> exceed all others.</p>

<p>Next to the Norwegian, the American coast was at one time so favoured
by strange marine ‘monsters,’ that they were commonly reported as ‘the
American sea serpent.’ Excepting these northern Atlantic visitants,
others have been observed mostly in the eastern seas, rarely in the
south.</p>

<p>This has given rise to the question, ‘How is it that they are seen
almost exclusively in the north?’ One reason may<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">[253]</a></span> be that there are
more persons to see them, and because marine traffic is far greater
in the north than in similar southern latitudes; and another reason
may be, that the rocky coasts of both continents in those latitudes
may afford congenial retreats for mammoth marine reptiles. We have
seen that reptiles exist for a very long period without breathing,
and even without air; as, for instance, those encased in baked mud in
the tropics, and those frozen up or bottled up tight and hermetically
sealed, as the examples given in preceding chapters.</p>

<p>From long observation of ophidian habits, I venture to offer certain
suggestions in addition to published opinions; and I may remind my
readers that as all reptiles undergo a species of hibernation, we may
reasonably conclude that these huge marine ones form no exception to
the rule. They may lie for months dormant in the deep recesses of the
ocean, and reappear during the long days and hot weather like their
land relatives. It seems strange that so far from this having been
taken into consideration, it has become the fashion to ridicule the
‘reappearance of the great sea serpent’ at the very time when all other
reptiles reappear as a matter of course. Long days are more favourable
for observations, and probably log-books record many other creatures,
whether mammal, bird, or fish, seen during the summer and not in other
seasons, as well as ‘sea serpents.’ Not because this is the slack time
of journalists, therefore, who are supposed to be at their wits’ end
for subjects, but simply because ships coming home at this time bring
reports of their summer observations.</p>

<p>It is much to be regretted that these reports have come<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_254" id="Page_254">[254]</a></span> to be
associated with ‘the gigantic gooseberry,’ and such seasonable wonders,
because the door to investigation is thus closed. It is also, to be
regretted that many hoaxes have undeniably been committed to print,
really to fill up newspaper columns, and feed a love of the marvellous.
Professor Owen’s words may well be repeated here, ‘It is far harder to
establish a truth than to kill an untruth.’</p>

<p>One more little matter is also to be seriously deplored; and this
is the unscientific habit of calling all these unfamiliar animals
‘monsters,’ a word signifying truly a <i>monstrosity</i>, a creature with
two heads, a beast with five or six legs instead of four, or other such
malformations. These are truly monsters, and to use the term otherwise
only creates mistaken impressions. Inadvertently even scientific men
fall into this habit; naturalists and well-known authorities are seen
in print to talk of these sea ‘monsters,’ but who in the same page
denounce exaggerated expressions.</p>

<p>In <i>Land and Water</i> of September 8, 1877, several of our distinguished
naturalists contributed papers on the evidence of the officers of
the royal yacht <i>Osborne</i>, relative to a large marine animal seen
off Sicily on June 3 of that year. Professor Owen also acceded to
an earnest request to add a few words on the subject, and it was
noticeable that more than once in his few pithy lines this eminent
authority delicately hinted at the mistake of calling animals
‘<i>monsters</i>’ without just reason for so doing: ‘The phenomena were
not necessarily caused by a <i>monster</i>,’ he writes; ‘and the words
... denote rather a cetacean than a <i>monster</i>.’ Again, ‘There are no
grounds for calling it a <i>monster</i>.’</p>

<p>On the occasion referred to, the official reports of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">[255]</a></span> animal seen
were sent to the Admiralty; and the Right Hon. R. A. Cross, then
Secretary of State for the Home Department, requested the opinion of
Mr. Frank Buckland on the matter, the result being a full account given
to the readers of <i>Land and Water</i>, to which Mr. F. Buckland was so
popular a contributor. In addition to Owen’s valued opinion, the public
were favoured with able papers by Mr. A. D. Bartlett, of the Zoological
Gardens, Captain David Gray, of the whaling ship <i>Eclipse</i>, Mr. Henry
Lee, and Frank Buckland himself.</p>

<p>From the discrepancies in the records of the four officers, and the
sketches of nothing in nature which accompanied those records, not one
of those able writers ventured an assertion as to what the strange
animal could possibly be. The captain&mdash;Commander Pearson&mdash;‘saw the
fish through a telescope;’ a ‘seal-shaped head of immense size, large
flappers, and part of a huge body.’</p>

<p>Lieutenant Haynes saw ‘a ridge of fins above the surface of the water,
extending about thirty feet, and varying from five to six feet in
height.’ Through the telescope he saw ‘a head, two flappers, and about
<i>thirty</i> feet of an animal’s shoulder; the shoulder was about <i>fifteen</i>
feet across.’ The animal propelled itself by its two ‘fins.’</p>

<p>Mr. Douglas M. Forsyth saw ‘a huge monster, having a head about fifteen
to twenty feet in length.’ The part of the body not in the water ‘was
certainly not under forty-five or fifty feet in length.’</p>

<p>Mr. Moore, the engineer, observed ‘an uneven ridge of what appeared
to be the fins of a fish above the surface of the water, varying in
height, and as near as he could<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">[256]</a></span> judge, from seven to eight feet above
the water, and extending about forty feet along the surface.’</p>

<p>Though we are not able to say what this strange animal really was, we
can positively affirm what it was <i>not</i>. A snake has neither fins,
flippers, flappers, nor ‘shoulders fifteen feet broad;’ therefore
this assuredly was no ‘sea serpent.’ Nor would it be introduced here,
excepting as inviting further comment on its mysterious existence.</p>

<p>And curious enough it is to remark the persistence with which all these
anomalies are announced as ‘<i>the</i> sea serpent,’ as if the sea produced
but one solitary specimen, which is now the shape of a ‘turtle;’ next
of a ‘frog,’ with ‘one hundred and fifty feet of tail;’ then a creature
with ‘fins’ and a ‘mane,’ ‘flippers’ and ‘flappers’ and ‘ridges of
fins.’ All these appendages are one after the other described, and yet
as belonging to a ‘serpent,’ which has no such appendages.</p>

<p>A few of the recorders do really describe something more of the true
ophidian, and those who do this, not being familiar with ophidian
manners, are more useful as witnesses than those who at once report a
‘serpent,’ and afterwards proceed unknowingly to disprove their own
words.</p>

<p>Among the more noteworthy, the following account, copied from the
Liverpool papers at the time, is worth considering:&mdash;</p>

<div class="pbq">

<p class="p1">‘The story of the mate and crew of the barque <i>Pauline</i>, of London,
said to have arrived in port from a twenty months’ voyage to Akyab,
about having seen a “sea serpent” while on a voyage in the Indian
seas, was yesterday declared to on oath before Mr. Raffles, the
stipendiary magistrate at the police court. The affidavit was made in
consequence of the doubtfulness with which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_257" id="Page_257">[257]</a></span>
anything about the sea serpent has hitherto been received; and to show
the genuine character of the story, it has been placed judicially on
record. The following is a copy of the declaration, which will be
regarded as unprecedented in its way:&mdash;</p>

<p class="pi4 p1">‘“<i>Borough of Liverpool, in the County Palatine of Lancaster, to wit.</i></p>

<p class="p1">‘“We, the undersigned, captain, officers, and crew of the barque
<i>Pauline</i> (of London), of Liverpool, in the county of Lancaster, in
the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, do solemnly and
sincerely declare that, on July 8, 1875, in lat. 5° 13´ S., long. 35°
W., we observed three large sperm whales, and one of them was gripped
round the body with two turns of what appeared to be a huge serpent.
The head and tail appeared to have a length beyond the coils of about
thirty feet, and its girth eight or nine feet. The serpent whirled its
victim round and round for about fifteen minutes, and then suddenly
dragged the whale to the bottom, head first.</p>

<p class="pi8">‘“GEORGE DREVAR, <i>Master</i>.<br />
‘“HORATIO THOMPSON.<br />
‘“JOHN HENDERSON LANDELLS.<br />
‘“OWEN BAKER.<br />
‘“WILLIAM LEWARN.</p>

<p class="p1">‘“Again, on July 13, a similar serpent was seen about two hundred
yards off, shooting itself along the surface, head and neck being out
of the water several feet. This was seen only by the captain and one
ordinary seaman, whose signatures are affixed.</p>

<p class="pi8">‘“GEORGE DREVAR, <i>Master</i>.</p>

<p class="p1">‘“A few moments after, it was seen elevated some sixty feet
perpendicularly in the air, by the chief officer and the following
able seamen, whose signatures are also affixed:&mdash;</p>

<p class="pi10">‘“HORATIO THOMPSON.<br />
‘“WILLIAM LEWARN.</p>

<p class="p1">‘“And we make this solemn declaration, conscientiously believing the
same to be true, and by virtue of the provisions of an Act made and
passed in the sixth year of the reign of his late Majesty, intituled
an Act to repeal an Act of the present session of Parliament,
intituled an Act for the more effectual abolition of oaths and
affirmations, taken and made in various departments of the State, and
to substitute declarations in lieu thereof, and for the more entire
suppression of voluntary and extra-judicial oaths and affidavits, and
to make other provisions for the abolition of unnecessary oaths.</p>

<p class="pi6">‘“GEORGE DREVAR, <i>Master</i>.<br />
‘“WILLIAM LEWARN, <i>Steward</i>.<br />
‘“HORATIO THOMPSON, <i>Chief Officer</i>.<br />
‘“JOHN HENDERSON LANDELLS, <i>Second Officer</i>.<br />
‘“OWEN BAKER.</p>

<p class="p1"><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">[258]</a></span></p>
‘ “Severally declared and subscribed at Liverpool aforesaid, the tenth<br />
day of January, one thousand eight hundred and seventy-seven, before
T. S. Raffles, J.P. for Liverpool.”’

</div>

<p class="p1">In the above descriptions there is no mention of fins, flippers, or
mane, but simply the manners of a huge constrictor, with the head
and the tail free, and the middle portion of its body engaged in
crushing the prey, a process which may at any time be seen in a captive
constrictor seizing its food. The ‘whirling its victim’ was, no doubt,
in the struggle between the two, the whale using its powerful efforts
to escape, but being overcome at last. Nor in comparison with the size
of the described serpent would a whale be impracticably large.</p>

<p>Again, in the next one seen, the true serpent motion is unintentionally
exhibited in the ‘shooting itself along the surface, the head and neck
being several feet out of water.’ Snakes continually advance with their
heads elevated; and their rapid, darting movements are well expressed
by ‘shooting.’</p>

<p>‘A few minutes after, it was seen elevated some sixty feet
perpendicularly in the air.’ <i>Sixty feet</i> at a guess. Unless some mast,
the precise height of which was known, or some other perpendicular
object were in close proximity, it would be exceedingly difficult to
estimate the height. To an unaccustomed eye even twenty or thirty
feet of snake suddenly darting upright from the waves would be a
startling and bewildering spectacle; yet we know that land snakes raise
themselves in this manner one-third, one-half, or for a moment even
more than that; ‘stand erect,’ some physiologists have stated (see
p. 181); so again, unintentionally,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">[259]</a></span> and by those not likely to be
familiar with ophidian capabilities, is a natural action described.</p>

<p>In several other instances, the animal seen has raised its head many
feet, and ‘let it down suddenly;’ exactly what land snakes do.</p>

<p>The one seen from on board H.M.S. <i>Dædalus</i> in 1848 is considered one
of the most circumstantially recorded evidences of some really existing
serpentine animal within the memory of many still living. It was much
commented upon in the journals of that year, and claims a passing
mention here.</p>

<p>Captain M’Quhæ, who commanded the <i>Dædalus</i>, in an official report to
the Admiralty, gave the date of the ‘monster’s’ appearance as August
6, 1848, and its exact locality in the afternoon of that day as lat.
24° 44’ S., and long. 9° 22’ E., which would be somewhere between the
Cape of Good Hope and St. Helena. In his own mind the captain had
no doubt whatever as to the nature of the animal, which he simply
reported as an ‘enormous serpent, with head and shoulders kept about
four feet constantly above the surface of the sea; and as nearly as
we could approximate, by comparing it with the length of what our
main-topsail yard would show in the water, there was, at the very
least, sixty feet of the animal <i>à fleur d’eau</i>, no portion of which
was, to our perception, used in propelling it through the water, either
by vertical or horizontal undulations. There seemed to be as much as
thirty to forty feet of tail as well.’ The animal passed the ship
‘rapidly, but so close under our lee-quarter, that, had it been a man
of my acquaintance, I should easily have recognised his features<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">[260]</a></span> with
the naked eye.’ The size of the creature is given as about fifteen
or sixteen inches diameter in the neck ‘behind the head, which was,
without doubt, that of a snake.’ No fins were seen, but ‘something like
the mane of a horse, or rather a bunch of seaweed washing about its
back.’ Its progress was about fifteen miles an hour, and it remained
twenty minutes in sight.</p>

<p>Lieutenant Drummond, also of the <i>Dædalus</i>, reported what he saw, and
from his log-book, while the captain’s was from memory. The lieutenant
thought he saw ‘a back fin ten feet long, and also a tail fin.’ The
head was ‘rather raised, and occasionally dipping, and gave him the
idea of that of a large eel.’</p>

<p>Without being an ophiologist, Captain M’Quhæ also unintentionally
describes a creature of ophidian habits and proportions. He
inadvertently says ‘shoulders,’ when, as my readers know, a snake has
anatomically no shoulders, any more than ‘neck.’ But for all that, the
raised head, and the absence of any striking movements in the part
visible, are the manners of a serpent in the water, when propelled
by its tail, which would be out of sight; and the captain simply
describing what he saw, but giving no name, those acquainted with
herpetology would at once decide that he described a long-necked and
slender reptile of some sort, perhaps some enormous saurian, whose feet
were under water, if not a serpent.</p>

<p>There were many learned discussions concerning this creature, and for
these I refer my reader to the journals and scientific publications of
the time. No one doubted the fact that some strange animal was seen,
but the wisest<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">[261]</a></span> refrained from giving it a name. Very similar was the
verdict on the more recent object seen from the <i>Osborne</i> in 1877;
but in those thirty intervening years a vast stride had been made in
zoological knowledge; and in the very able papers written on this later
phenomenon, we now find a general disposition to accept the fact that
there <i>are</i> gigantic forms of marine animals existing, that have not as
yet been scientifically described and received into systematic zoology.</p>

<p>Mr. A. D. Bartlett, in the discussion already alluded to, after
dispassionately reviewing and criticizing the evidence of H.M.’s
officers, thus concludes:&mdash;</p>

<div class="pbq">

<p class="p1">‘When we consider the vast extent of the ocean, its great depth,
the rocky, cavernous nature of the bottom,&mdash;of many parts of which
we know really nothing,&mdash;who can say what may be hidden for ages,
and may still remain a mystery for generations yet to come; for we
have evidence on land that there exists some of the largest mammals,
probably by thousands, of which only one solitary individual has been
caught or brought to notice. I allude to the Hairy-eared Two-horned
Rhinoceros (<i>R. lasiotis</i>), captured in 1868 at Chittagong (where it
was found stranded in the mud), and now known as an inhabitant of the
Zoological Gardens.</p>

<p>‘This animal remains unique, and no part or portion was previously
known to exist in any museum at home or abroad.</p>

<p>‘(We have here an instance of the existence of a species found on the
continent of India, where for many years collectors and naturalists
have worked and published lists of all the animals met with, and have
hitherto failed to meet with or obtain any knowledge of this great
beast.)</p>

<p>‘May I not therefore presume that in the vast and mighty ocean,
animals, perhaps of nocturnal habits (and therefore never, except by
some extraordinary accident, forced into sight), may exist, whose form
may resemble the extinct reptiles whose fossil remains we find in such
abundance.</p>

<p>‘As far as I am able to judge from the evidence before me, I have
reason to believe that aquatic reptiles of vast size have been seen
and described by those persons who have endeavoured to explain what
they have witnessed.</p>

<p>‘One thing is certain, that many well-known reptiles have the power
of remaining for long periods (months, in fact) at the bottom, under
water or imbedded in soft mud, being so provided with organs of
circulation and respiration that they need not come to the surface
<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_262" id="Page_262">[262]</a></span>to breathe. The large crocodiles, alligators, and turtles have this
power, and I see no valid reason to doubt but that there may and do
exist in the unknown regions of the ocean, creatures so constructed.</p>

<p>‘It may be argued that if such animals still live, they must from
time to time die, and their bodies would float, and their carcases
would be found, or parts of them would wash on shore. To this I say:
however reasonable such arguments may appear, most animals that die
or are killed in the water, sink at first to the bottom, where they
are likely to have the flesh and soft parts devoured by other animals,
such as crustacea, fishes, etc. etc., and sinking in the deep, the
bones, being heavier than the other parts, may soon become imbedded,
and thus concealed from sight.’</p>

</div>

<p class="p1">It was gratifying to me to find my own ideas of hibernation thus
supported, the above allusion to the probability of temporary repose in
marine reptiles being the first I had met with.</p>

<p>Mr. Henry Lee, in the same issue, reminds us that the existence of
gigantic cuttle-fish was popularly disbelieved until within the past
five or six years, during which period several specimens&mdash;some of them
fifty feet in total length&mdash;have been taken, and all doubts upon the
subject have been removed. He argues, also, that during the deep-sea
dredgings of H.M. ships <i>Lightning</i>, <i>Porcupine</i>, and <i>Challenger</i>,
many new species of mollusca, supposed to have been extinct ever since
the Chalk epoch, were brought to light, and that there were brought up
by the deep-sea trawlings from great depths <i>fishes of unknown species,
which could not exist near the surface owing to the distension and
rupture of their air-bladder when removed from the pressure of deep
water</i>.</p>

<p>Forcibly suggestive are such facts of still further undiscovered
denizens of the deep! And as to <i>what</i> they are, fish, mammal, or
reptile, or a compound of either two or all three of these, why doubt
<i>any</i> possibility when we know that on land are similarly complicated
organisms which so lately have perplexed our most able physiologists?
Take, for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_263" id="Page_263">[263]</a></span> example, that curious anomaly, the mud-fish of the Gambia,
<i>Lepidosiren</i>, referred to in the last chapter, and which, to look at,
is as much like a lizard as a fish, with its four singular appendages
where either legs or fins might be. Again, we have that paradox in
nature&mdash;bird, reptile, and quadruped combined&mdash;in the Australian
<i>Platypus</i>, a semi-aquatic animal. ‘These two fresh-water animals
are,’ says Darwin, ‘among the most anomalous forms now found in the
world; and like fossils, they connect, to a certain extent, orders
at present widely sundered in the natural scale.’<a name="FNanchor_76_76" id="FNanchor_76_76"></a><a href="#Footnote_76_76" class="fnanchor">[76]</a> Other equally
remarkable links between the various groups might be cited to prepare
us for any marine anomalies which may hereafter surprise us. Taking
into consideration, also, that many of our smaller aquatic animals
have their representatives on a huge scale in the ocean, why should
there not be gigantic ophidian forms to correspond with the terrestrial
pythons and anacondas? As in point of size salt-water fishes exceed
those of our rivers, and as the enormous marine mammalia exceed those
on land, we might the rather wonder if there were not <i>one</i> ‘great
sea serpent,’ but many unsuspected species of reptiles, compound
ophiosaurians, or saurophidians, or who shall say what, in those
inaccessible depths.</p>

<p>‘How is it none have ever been captured?’ it is asked. In reply, Has
any one ever captured a swiftly-retreating land snake escaping pursuit?
Who can overtake or circumvent it when in its tropical vigour? And
how vastly must the powers and swiftness of those immense pelagians
exceed the kinds with which we are familiar! ‘Then, Why have no bones
been found?’ Mr. Bartlett’s reason is one of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">[264]</a></span> those assigned, and in
addition I may suggest that the love of locality, so strong in land
reptiles, may also exist in marine ones, which probably retire to the
recesses of their submarine habitats to die.</p>

<p>‘How is it none have ever been killed?’ Well! A cannon ball on the
instant, and not much less, would be required to ‘kill it on the spot,’
as some have sagely recommended.</p>

<p>Mr. Henry Lee, among others, does not regard capture as impossible
and in support of my own speculations&mdash;more correctly speaking
<i>imagination</i>, perhaps&mdash;I give the concluding words of his paper:&mdash;</p>

<p class="pbq p1">‘I therefore think it by no means impossible&mdash;first, that there may
be gigantic marine animals unknown to science having their ordinary
<i>habitat</i> in the great depths of the sea, only occasionally coming
to the surface, and perhaps avoiding habitually the light of day;
and, second, that there may still exist, though supposed to have been
long extinct, some of the old sea reptiles whose fossil remains tell
of their magnitude and habits, or others of species unknown even to
palæontologists.</p>

<p class="pbq">‘The evidence is, to my mind, conclusive that enormous animals, with
which zoologists are at present unacquainted, exist in the “great and
wide sea,” and I look forward hopefully to the capture of one or more
of them, and the settlement of this vexed question.’</p>

<p class="p1">I cannot conclude this chapter without further reference to one
other of our very popular physiologists, Dr. Andrew Wilson. The week
following that in which Owen, Captain Gray, and Messrs. Lee, Buckland,
and Bartlett contributed their opinions to <i>Land and Water</i>, September
8, 1877, Dr. Wilson also favoured its readers with two closely written
pages on ‘The Sea Serpent of Science.’ Some of his introductory words
have been already quoted. He then presents the claims to attention
which these various ‘sea monsters’ offer, as reported by thoroughly
trustworthy<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">[265]</a></span> witnesses, suggesting that the idea of a ‘serpent’ is too
restricted.</p>

<p>Notwithstanding much already said, the opinion of Dr. Wilson will be
valued by many of my readers, and I therefore give portions in his own
words:&mdash;</p>

<p class="pbq p1">‘As far as I have been able to ascertain, zoologists and other writers
on this subject have never made allowance for the <i>abnormal and huge
development of ordinary marine animals</i>. My own convictions on this
matter find in these the most reasonable and likely explanation of the
personality of the sea serpent, and also the reconciliation of such
discrepancies as the various narratives may be shown to evince.... I
think we may build up a most reasonable case both for their existence
and for the explanation of their true nature, by taking into account
the fact that <i>the term “sea serpent,” as ordinarily employed, must be
extended to include other forms of vertebrate animals which possess
elongated bodies: and that cases of the abnormally large development
of ordinary serpents and of serpent-like animals will reasonably
account for the occurrence of the animals popularly named “sea
serpents.”</i> ...</p>

<p class="pbq">‘Whilst to my mind the only feasible explanation of the narrative of
the crew of the <i>Pauline</i> must be founded on the idea that the animals
observed by them were gigantic snakes, the habits of the animals
in attacking the whales evidently point to a close correspondence
with those of terrestrial serpents of large size, such as the boas
and pythons; whilst the fact of the animals being described in the
various narratives as swimming with the head out of the water would
seem to indicate that, like all reptiles, they were air-breathers,
and required to come more or less frequently to the surface for the
purpose of respiration.’</p>

<p class="p1">Apology is due to so eminent a physiologist for having first given
expression to my own opinion on the <i>Pauline</i> serpent, though in
tardily quoting a high authority I may risk suspicion of plagiarism.
I must be permitted to explain, therefore, that on seeing the subject
ventilated in <i>Land and Water</i> (to which I had for some years been a
contributor on ophidian matters), I also, though uninvited, prepared a
paper on ‘the sea serpent.’ In a letter to the Editors, I even presumed
to criticise part of what had lately appeared, enclosing MS. with yet
more.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">[266]</a></span></p>

<p>In reply, I was informed that the subject would not be continued or
‘re-opened,’ and my returned MS. is still before me, much of it now
for the first time being presented to the public. To proceed with Dr.
Wilson:&mdash;</p>

<p class="pbq p1">‘The most important feature in my theory, ... and that which really
constitutes the strong point of this explanation, is the probability
of the development of a huge or gigantic size of ordinary marine
serpents....</p>

<p class="pbq">‘Is there anything more improbable, I ask, in the idea of a gigantic
development of an ordinary marine snake into a veritable giant of its
race; or, for that matter, in the existence of distinct species of
monster sea serpents, than in the production of huge cuttle-fishes,
which, until within the past few years, remained unknown to the
foremost pioneers of science? In the idea of the gigantic developments
of snakes or snake-like animals, be they fishes or reptiles, I hold we
have at least a feasible and rational explanation of the primary fact
of the actual existence of such organisms.’</p>

<p class="p1">In a most interesting lecture on ‘Zoological Myths,’ delivered at St.
George’s Hall, January 2, 1881, Dr. Andrew Wilson again laid much
stress on the ‘gigantic development of an ordinary marine snake into’
one of those amazing individuals which, say, at the very least, are
over a hundred feet in length!</p>

<p>How long would the poison fang of such a reptile be? How many ounces of
venom would its glands contain? Or does the Dr. wish us to understand
that as the vertebræ of a <i>Hydrophis</i> has gradually developed into
the complicated structure of a constrictor, so has the poison-fang
become gradually obsolete? Appalling, indeed, would it be were those
enormous developments armed with poison-fangs! Monarchs of the deep
they truly would be. Happily, venomous serpents are restricted in
their size; but an interesting speculation has been opened in the
above theory of abnormal development, and I trust it may be followed
up by abler reasoners than the present humble writer.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_267" id="Page_267">[267]</a></span> In the previous
chapter the distinguishing characteristics of the true marine snakes
were described, and I feel more disposed to agree with Dr. Andrew
Wilson when he says, ‘<i>or for the matter of that, in the existence of
distinct species of monster sea serpents</i>,’ than in the development of
a small venomous one into an amazing constrictor. Except the ‘monster.’
Why should not the gigantic forms be perfect in themselves, with an
inherited anatomical structure? In volume xviii. of <i>Nature</i>, 1878, Dr.
Andrew Wilson again discusses the sea serpent, and thus concludes:’ ...
and as a firm believer from the standpoint of zoology that the large
development of the marine ophidians of warmer seas offers the true
explanation of the sea-serpent mystery.’</p>

<p>Their physical constitution, then, as well as structure, must have very
much changed to enable them to exist so far from the tropics.</p>

<p>And still there are the creatures with flippers, and flappers, and fins
to decide upon. And then the gigantic salamander with a hundred and
fifty feet of tail! But these not being ophidians, and certainly not
‘sea serpents,’ must not intrude themselves here.</p>

<p>In their enormous development alone the supporters of Darwin may justly
exult, for surely in them we shall see ‘the survival of the fittest.’</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-267.jpg" width="200" height="72"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">[268]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-075.jpg" width="500" height="112"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XVI.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>RATTLESNAKE HISTORY.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap06">FROM the peculiar rattling appendage, with which this snake is armed,
it has excited the notice of European explorers since the very first
settlement of the American Continent. Whenever a traveller attempted
any printed account of the New World and its products, mention was made
of this ‘viper with the bell.’</p>

<p>By and by, in 1762, a live specimen was brought to England, where it
arrested the attention of the members of the Royal Society and the
scientific ‘Chirugions’ of the day.</p>

<p>From this time the rattlesnake began to be honoured with a literature
of its own&mdash;one which equals if not exceeds in interest that of any
other ophidian history handed down to us; for Cleopatra’s asp has its
literature, and the <i>Cobra capella</i>, and M’Leod’s boa, and some few
other distinguished ophidians, but none so voluminous and inexhaustible
as the American <i>Crotalus</i> with its sonorous tail.</p>

<p>And despite the attention of naturalists for above two hundred years,
it is not yet done with. First its rattle, then<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">[269]</a></span> its fangs, next its
maternal affection and the security offered to its young in ‘its own
bosom,’ then its ‘pit,’ and again its rattle&mdash;each and all in turn
have continued to occupy the pen of zoologists as, with the advance of
science, fresh light has been thrown upon ophiology.</p>

<p>American naturalists have continually something new to tell us about
the <i>Crotalus</i>, and not even yet have they decided among themselves of
what precise use that remarkable rattle is, either to its owner or its
auditors.</p>

<p>The various theories regarding its construction, mode of growth, its
age and supposed uses, will occupy the second part of the present
subject; other rattlesnake features will come in their places, but
first an outline of what the early English writers had to say about it
will not be devoid of interest.</p>

<p>Natural history as a science was then in its infancy. The Royal Society
of England had as yet no existence; snakes were ‘insects,’ because they
lay eggs; insects were ‘serpents,’ because they creep; and the majority
of all such ‘creeping things’ were ‘venomous,’ of course.</p>

<p>In those early days of science there was little or no recognition of
species, two, or at most three, different kinds of rattlesnakes being
named. The distinguishing rattle seemed enough to separate them from
all other snakes: they were ‘the vipers with the bell,’ or ‘the vipers
with the sounding tail.’ ‘Vipers’ they were at once decided to be,
conformably with the old idea that vipers, in distinction to every
other kind of snake, produced their young alive. In this respect those
early observers were correct; and from their general characteristics
they are still <i>vipers</i> in the eyes<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">[270]</a></span> of science: that is, they belong
to the sub-order <i>Viperina</i>, though their dentition more than any other
feature separates them from the rest, and we know now that several
non-venomous snakes produce live young as well as the vipers.</p>

<p>In appearance the rattlesnake is so well known that a minute
description of it is uncalled for. Throughout the whole genera of the
<i>Crotalidæ</i> the viperine character is seen in the broad, angular,
flattish head; the thinner neck, distinct between it and the thicker
body; a short, tapering tail, and a generally repulsive appearance with
an evil expression about it, as if no further warning were required to
announce its deadly qualities.</p>

<p>Nevertheless, many of the rattlesnakes possess an undeniably handsome
exterior. Their colours are for the most part dark and rich, relieved
with lighter markings and velvety black; often wearing a brilliant
prismatic hue, which still further enriches their tints. And then the
rattle at once announces the name of its owner.</p>

<p>It is not easy to decide on the writer or traveller from whom we
get the first mention of the rattlesnake, which has an extensive
geographical range on both the American continents. It was undoubtedly
some South American explorer early in the sixteenth century, and long
before any settlement in the New World had been made by the English.</p>

<p>In a rare old book, the first edition of which was published in London,
1614, viz. ‘<i>Samvel Purchas. His Pilgrimage in all Ages; being an
account of all the Places discovered since the Creation of the World</i>,’
we hear of many Spanish and Portuguese authors who are but little known
in England, and from each and all of whom the indefatigable ‘Pilgrim<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">[271]</a></span>’
has culled information. Indeed, the book is a careful compilation
from all the previous writers of any worth, though those only who
mentioned the Brazilian serpents need be here introduced to the reader.
These, in describing some unchanging peculiarities, and in giving us
the vernacular names then common, have been of much use in assisting
subsequent writers to identify certain species.</p>

<p>Hakluyt, Hernandez, Master Anthony Kniuet, and many others are quoted
by Purchas, but of them all, ‘No man hath written so absolute a
Discourse of Brazil as was taken from a Portugall Frier and sold to
Master Hakluit,’ he tells us; giving at the same time a history of the
persecution and imprisonment of this unfortunate friar, whose unusual
intelligence seems to have rendered him an object of suspicion. Thus do
we who come after benefit by the misfortunes of our predecessors, and
thus has the stolen ‘Discourse’ of the sixteenth century been turned to
account for our edification in the nineteenth.</p>

<p>In the Portuguese friar’s description of animals, it is not difficult
to separate the true snakes from the ‘Serpentes with foure Legges and
a Taile,’ or to identify the rattlesnakes among them. Says the writer,
‘The Boycininga is a Snake called of the Bell: it is of a great Poison,
but it maketh such a Noise with a Bell it hath in its Tayle that it
catcheth very few: though it be so swift that they call it the flying
Snake. His Length is twelve or thirteen Spannes long. There is another
<i>Boycininpeba</i>. This also hath a Bell, but smaller. It is blacke and
very venomous.’</p>

<p>These two may be <i>Crotalus horridus</i> and <i>Crotalus durissus</i>, the two
commonest; or they may be only one<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">[272]</a></span> species of a different size, age,
and colouring&mdash;a confusion which frequently occurs with even more
recent and more scientific worthies than the good ‘Pilgrim’ Purchas. In
a later edition he says: ‘Other Serpents there are that carrie upon the
Tippe of their Tayle a certaine little roundelle, like a Bell, which
ringeth as they goe.’</p>

<p>Marcgrave, in his <i>Travels in Brazil</i>, 1648, further helps us to label
the right snake with the long vernaculars by figuring a rattlesnake
and calling it by the same name, only with an additional syllable,
<i>Boicinininga</i>, <i>quem Cascavel</i>, the latter euphonious Spanish word,
for a little round bell, having widely obtained ever since.</p>

<p>As soon as the first English colony was settled in North America, the
rattlesnake again comes upon the stage. Captain John Smith, whom we may
call the founder of Virginia (since it was owing to his good judgment,
endurance, and intelligence that the colony did not share the fate of
Sir W. Raleigh’s adventurers), tells us of the ornaments worn by the
Indians, and the favour in which certain <i>Rattells</i> were held by them
as amulets. In his <i>Generall Historie of Virginia</i>, 1632, Captain Smith
describes their barbarous adornments,&mdash;birds’ claws, serpent skins,
feathers with a ‘rattell’ tied on to them, which ‘Rattells they take
from the Taile of a Snake,’ and regard with superstitious veneration.</p>

<p>With the spirit of enterprise which marked that era, and the discovery
of new countries and strange creatures, ‘Natural History’ began to be a
recognised science in Europe. Aldrovanus and Gesner had produced their
ponderous tomes, and the authors quoted by Purchas were eagerly read
by Ingenious Chirugions, who in England<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">[273]</a></span> appear to have taken the lead
in science; while at Florence an assembly of ‘Knowing Physicians’ were
experimentalizing with all the Vipers procurable in Southern Europe,
holding council as to the source of their ‘Mischiefs’ and specific
‘Remedies for their Bitings,’ etc., with just such tests with the
‘Master Teeth’ of both living and dead vipers as have of late again
occupied the attention of living scientists. In 1660 the learned Redi
of Florence published his book on Vipers, and soon after M. Moyse
Charas, a Frenchman, produced a work which would not be a bad textbook
even now.</p>

<p>And for the Scientific World what greater stimulus could arise than
the foundation of the ROYAL SOCIETY by Charles II., and the channel
for ventilating discoveries and inventions which their published
<i>Transactions</i> afforded? Very early in these do we find that viper
poison was engaging professional attention, and soon did communications
appear from those ‘knowing physicians’ at Florence. A correspondence
sprang up between M.D.’s of England, France, and Italy; and the
details of their experiments proved very inciting to the members of
the Royal Society of London, who with the limited subjects at their
disposal&mdash;virtually only our own little English viper&mdash;also set
themselves to work to analyze the ‘Poyson Bag.’</p>

<p>One enthusiast, Mr. Platt, addressing the Royal Society from Florence,
with an account of some of the experiments then going on, made mention
of the M. Charas who had written such an important work, and ended by
hoping to animate the <i>virtuosi</i> here to ‘do something that may be not
unworthy your knowlege.’<a name="FNanchor_77_77" id="FNanchor_77_77"></a><a href="#Footnote_77_77" class="fnanchor">[77]</a></p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_274" id="Page_274">[274]</a></span></p>

<p>That the work of M. Moyse Charas was translated into English the
following year, proves that the English <i>virtuosi</i> had really become
‘animated’ in the looked-for direction.<a name="FNanchor_78_78" id="FNanchor_78_78"></a><a href="#Footnote_78_78" class="fnanchor">[78]</a></p>

<p>In the preface of his book we read: ‘If Reflexion be made on the many
Wonders that are found in the Body of this Animal’ (the viper), ‘it
will be easily granted that it cannot be inquir’d into with too much
Exactness: and that it is not a Work that can be finish’t at one or two
Sittings.’</p>

<p>This little digression from the rattlesnake is not without its object;
for from this correspondence through the <i>Philosophical Transactions</i>
we may date the birth of ophiological science in England; and the
reader will be able to place himself on that standpoint in order to
reciprocate the kind of interest with which such an entirely strange
and as yet unknown serpent as a rattlesnake was received a short time
afterwards.</p>

<p>In vol. x. 1676, there is ‘An Account of Virginia, its Situation,
Temperature,’ etc., communicated by Mr. Thomas Glover, ‘an ingenious
Chirugion that hath lived some years in the Country.’</p>

<p>This gentleman tells us of the climate and productions of the new
colony, not omitting those of the animal and vegetable kingdoms;
among the various strange creatures which he describes in the crude
language of the time are five or six sorts of snakes, amongst which
‘the Rattlesnake is the most remarkable, being about the bigness of a
Man’s Legg, and for the most part a yard and a half long. He<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_275" id="Page_275">[275]</a></span> hath a
Rattle at the End of his Tail, wherewith he maketh a Noise when any one
approacheth nigh him: which seemeth to be a peculiar Providence of God
to warn People to avoid the Danger; for this Creature is so venomous
that the Bite of it is of most dangerous Consequence, unless they make
use of the proper Antidote, of which I shall take occasion to speak
somewhat hereafter.’</p>

<p>Such accounts, coupled with the interest awakened in the members of
the Royal Society by the Florentine experimentalists, caused the first
arrival of a rattlesnake in England to be a grand era in ophiological
annals; and with its eventful appearance began its scientific history.</p>

<p>The published records of the <i>Philosophical Transactions</i> again
perpetuate the impressions it created, and also many collateral points
of interest.</p>

<p>A paper entitled <i>Vipera Caudisona Americana; or, The Anatomy of a
Rattle-Snake</i>, was read by Dr. Edward Tyson, of the Royal Medical
College of London, in 1683; who dissected one at the repository of the
Royal Society in Jan. 1682. (The above scientific name is erroneously
attributed to Laurenti, 1768.)</p>

<p>That nothing of much value to science was previously known about
the reptile we gather from Dr. Tyson’s introductory words. ‘It were
mightily to be wisht that we had the most compleat account of so
<i>Curious</i> an <i>Animal</i>. This which we <i>Dissected</i> was sent to Mr. Henry
Loades, a merchant in London, from Virginia, who was pleased not only
to gratify the <i>Curiosity</i> of the Royal Society, in showing it them
alive, but likewise gave it them when dead.’</p>

<p>Thus did Mr. Loades unconsciously immortalize himself<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">[276]</a></span> in the history
of rattlesnakes. Merchants in those days were not F.Z.S.’s; and it is
probable that he thought of nothing beyond ingratiating himself with
the members of a learned Society by presenting them with a ‘serpente’
dead, whose ‘Bell’ had excited their curiosity when living; and he
little dreamed that the origin and use of this strange <i>bell</i> would not
be determined two hundred years afterwards.</p>

<p>Says Dr. Tyson: ‘I find the inward parts so conformable to those of a
Viper that I have taken the liberty of placing it in that Classe and
(since it has not that I know of any Latine Name) of giving it that of
<i>Vipera Caudisona</i>: for as I am informed by Merchants ‘tis Viviparous,
and the Epithet sufficiently differences it from those that have no
Rattle.’</p>

<p>This scholarly anatomist had evidently devoted much careful labour to
the task of hunting up all the literature that could throw any light on
his much-prized specimen. He had no doubt been one of those ‘animated’
by the Florentine savants, and had made himself acquainted with all
the viperine characters. He had doubtless read all that had already
appeared in the <i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, and also the narratives
of such <i>voyageurs</i> as Hakluyt, Hernandez, Piso, and Marcgravius.</p>

<p>Among the useful results of his researches he is able to give us many,
we may say most, of its vernaculars in the countries of the New World
settled by Europeans up to that date; and as in subsequent books of
travel we hear of the rattlesnake frequently under these vernaculars,
until, as of later years, its ordinary English name has been familiar
to all, we have had a good deal to thank him for, were it only this.</p>

<p>In addition to the authors already named, he gives us<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">[277]</a></span> Guliemus Piso,
Johnston, Merembergius, and ‘others that have wrot of it, and its
anatomy, under the names of Boigininga or Boiginininga and Boiquira,
which are its Brazile Names. By the Portuguese it is called Casca
vela and Tangador: by the Dutch, Raetel Sclange; by those of Mexico,
Teutlaco-cauehqui or Teuhtlacotl zauhqui, <i>i.e. Domina Serpentum</i>: and
from its swift motion on the Rocks like the wind, Hoacoatl.’</p>

<p>Minutely and scientifically was that ‘viper with the sounding tail’
dissected and studied out by Dr. Tyson just two hundred years ago; and
the excellent illustrations with which his description was elucidated
were subsequently used in many first-class physiological works.</p>

<p>Not even the ‘pit’ escaped the notice of that nice anatomist,&mdash;the
‘nasal fosse,’ or ‘sort of second nostril,’ as it was for a long while
called,&mdash;and its use conjectured, and which has given to a very large
group of venomous serpents the name of ‘pit vipers,’ the peculiar
orifice not being confined to the American <i>Crotalus</i> alone (see chap.
xxi.).</p>

<p>‘Between the nostrils and eyes are two other orifices which at first
I took to be Ears,’ he tells us, speaking of this ‘pit,’ ‘but after
found they only led into a Bone that had a pretty large cavity, but
no perforation.’ He had seen that vipers&mdash;the European vipers which
he had previously known&mdash;had not these orifices. Then he comments on
the great Provision of Nature in furnishing the strong, smooth ‘belly
scales,’ (see illustration, p. 193), and the ‘very long trachea of 20
inches. <i>Nature</i> is mightily provident in supplying them with <i>Air</i>, in
bestowing on them so large a Receptacle for receiving it.’</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">[278]</a></span></p>

<p>Tyson quotes from the ‘contests between the noble Italian Redi, and
the Frenchman M. Charas,’ as to the source of the poison in vipers,
and makes discoveries for himself, as for instance the mobility of the
jaw in elevating and depressing the fang, the structure of the teeth,
and various other matters which in this book are discussed in their
several chapters, but which were then for the first time scientifically
described in English by Tyson.</p>

<p>True that a little traditional gossip about the rattle, which he had
gathered from less competent sources, creeps in towards the conclusion
of the paper. While the learned M.D. writes from his own observations
and scientific knowledge, he affords valuable information; and we can
dispense with the hearsay of the day. However, all honour be to Dr.
Tyson of two hundred years ago, who was the first to give us ‘The
Anatomy of the Rattlesnake,’ and its first scientific name.</p>

<p>As the two American continents became more widely known to Europeans,
and Englishmen were seized with a desire to visit the new colonies,
books of travels and descriptions multiplied too rapidly for even a
passing mention in these pages; though wherever the slightest approach
to natural history was included, the rattlesnake figured conspicuously.
Of those works frequently quoted by naturalists, Seba’s <i>Rerum
Naturalium Thesauri</i> in 1735, of four ponderous volumes, containing
text in both Latin and French, and profusely illustrated, must not be
omitted, though about the <i>Crotalus</i> he has not much new to tell us.
He quotes Tyson and others, and explains that the many nearly similar
names are ‘<i>selon la difference de prononciation des Bresiliens,
qui la nomme aussi Boiquira</i>;’ and he thinks all<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">[279]</a></span> these names ‘<i>ne
désignent qu’une seule et même vipère</i>.’ To these various titles of
‘one and the same viper,’ we shall refer again in chap. xxiii. To
the list he adds that the English call it ‘rattlesnake;’ the French,
‘<i>serpent à sonnettes</i>;’ and Latin authors, <i>Anguis crotalophorus</i>
(or the rattle-bearing snake). He also gives us another Mexican name,
‘<i>Ecacoatl, qui signifie le Vent, parce qu’elle rampe avec une extrème
vitesse sur les rochers</i>.’</p>

<p>This extreme activity in the rattlesnake is not in accordance with
our alien experience. Still we hear of it from more than one writer
and in widely separated habitats. The Mexican and Brazilian words may
have alluded to the rapidity of motion in striking its prey, and which
in its swiftness can scarcely be followed. Or it is possible that the
reptile which as a captive in our chilling climate is so slow and
sluggish, may, when stimulated by a tropical sun and under peculiar
excitement, occasionally exhibit a vivacity incredible to us who see it
only in menageries. Regarding other species of viperine snakes, we have
sometimes similar evidence; and there is nothing in the structure of
the <i>Crotalus</i> to contradict it.</p>

<p>One more of the unpronounceable Mexican names we must inflict on the
reader, to show how this serpent was distinguished among all others
even in length of title. F. Fernandez, or Hernandez, in his <i>Animalium
Mexicanum</i>, p. 63, A.D. 1628, calls it Teuchlacotzauhqui, because it
surpasses all others in ‘<i>l’horrible bruit de sa sonnette</i>.’</p>

<p>As may be supposed, anybody who could see this remarkable snake on its
native soil was ready to tell something about it; and from the time
that Dr. Tyson dissected his specimen and made it better known to the
‘Curious,’ many<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">[280]</a></span> other communications saw light through the pages of
the <i>Philosophical Transactions</i> during the next few years.</p>

<p>In experimenting to discover the source of the ‘mischief,’ one skilful
‘Chyrurgeon’ proved that the gall of vipers is not venomous, only
bitter.</p>

<p>A Mr. John Clayton, in an <i>Account of the Beasts in Virginia</i>, 1694,
tells us the rattlesnake’s ‘Tayle is composed of perished Joynts like
a dry Husk. The Old shake and shiver these Rattles with wonderful
Nimbleness; the Snake is a Majestick sort of Creature, and will scarce
meddle with anything unless provoked.’ He also describes the ‘fistulous
Teeth’ and the poison being injected through these ‘into the very mass
of the blood.’ Effective remedies are spoken of, as if not much doubt
of a cure existed. An Indian was bitten in the arm, who ‘clapt a hot
burning coal thereon and singed it stoutly.’</p>

<p>In Italy experiments still went on, and a Mr. C. J. Sprengle wrote to
the Royal Society from Milan (1722), that in a room opened at the top
were sixty vipers from all parts of Italy. ‘Whereupon we catch’d some
mice and threw them in, one at a time, among all that number of vipers;
but not one concerned himself about the mice, only one pregnant viper
who interchanged eyes with the mouse, which took a turn or two, giving
now and then a squeak, and then ran with great swiftness into the chops
of the viper, where it gradually sunk down the gullet.’ And from this
sinister proceeding on the part of the viper, Mr. Sprengle argues a
fact generally borne out in zoological collections ever since, namely,
that venomous snakes in captivity will not eat until they become
reconciled.</p>

<p>And so by degrees these many interesting ophiological facts have been
worked out and established. In 1733, vol.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">[281]</a></span> xxxviii., some experiments
made by Sir Hans Sloane are recorded. A dog was made to tread on a
rattlesnake which bit him. In one minute of time the dog was paralytic
in the hinder legs, and was dead in less than three minutes.</p>

<p>Another subject of subsequent interest and even importance was some
observations made by Sir Hans Sloane on the ‘Charms, Inchantments, or
Fascinations of Snakes,’ in reply to communications by Paul Dudley,
Esq., F.R.S., and Col. Beverley, both of whom believed that the
rattlesnake could bring a bird or a squirrel from a tree into their
mouths by the power of their eye.</p>

<p>A word on fascination will come in its place, but as a part of
rattlesnake history Sir Hans Sloane may be quoted here. And yet a
reason so long ago suggested by him, who <i>thoughtfully</i> watched a
snake, seems almost entirely to have escaped notice. He thinks ‘the
whole mystery of charming or enchanting any Creature is simply this.
Small Animals or Birds bitten, the poison allows them time to run a
little way (as perhaps a bird to fly up into a tree), where the snakes
watch them with great earnestness, till they fall down, when the snakes
swallow them.’<a name="FNanchor_79_79" id="FNanchor_79_79"></a><a href="#Footnote_79_79" class="fnanchor">[79]</a></p>

<p>Sir Hans Sloane quotes a good deal from the work by Colonel
Beverley,<a name="FNanchor_80_80" id="FNanchor_80_80"></a><a href="#Footnote_80_80" class="fnanchor">[80]</a> and the observations made by him; particularly one which
the author remarks is a ‘curiosity which he never met with in print,’
viz. the instinct which displays itself so strongly <i>after death</i> in
the rattlesnake. A man chopped off the head and a few inches of the
neck of a rattlesnake, and then on touching the ‘springing teeth with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_282" id="Page_282">[282]</a></span>
a stick, the head gave a sudden champ with its mouth,’ thus displaying
the impulse to bite. He noticed the action of the springing teeth ‘when
they are raised, which I take to be only at the will of the snake to do
mischief.’ Strange to tell, many of the above peculiarities have been
described as ‘new to science’ within forty years.</p>

<p>But among those who wrote of our American colonies, Lawson must not
be omitted. Describing the ‘Insects of Carolina,’ viz. alligators,
rattlesnakes, water snakes, swamp snakes, frogs, great loach, lizards,
worms, etc., he tells us what was then new about the subject of this
chapter.</p>

<p>‘The Rattlesnakes are found on all the Main of America that I ever had
any Account of: being so called from the Rattle at the End of their
Tails, which is a Connexion of jointed Coverings of an excrementitious
Matter, betwixt the Substance of a Nail and a Horn, though each Tegment
is very thin. Nature seems to have designed these on purpose to give
Warning of such an approaching Danger as the venomous Bite of these
Snakes is. Some of them grow to a very great Bigness, as six Feet
in Length; their Middle being the Thickness of the Small of a lusty
Man’s Leg. They are of an orange, tawny, and blackish Colour on the
Back, differing (as all Snakes do) in Colour on the Belly; being of an
Ash Colour inclining to Lead. The Male is easily distinguished from
the Female by a black Velvet Spot on his Head; and besides his Head
is smaller-shaped and long. Their Bite is venomous if not speedily
remedied; especially if the Wound be in a Vein, Nerve, Tendon, or
Sinew, when it is very difficult to cure. The Indians are the best
Physicians for the Bite of these, and all other venomous Creatures of
this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">[283]</a></span> Country. The Rattle-Snakes are accounted the peaceablest in the
World, for they never attack any One or injure them unless trodden
upon or molested. The most Danger of being bit by these Snakes is for
those that survey Land in Carolina; yet I never heard of any Surveyor
that was killed or hurt by them. I have myself gone over several of
this Sort; yet it pleased God I never came to any Harm. They have the
Power or Art (I know not which to call it) to charm Squirrels, Hares,
Partridges, or any such Thing, in such a Manner that they run directly
into their Mouths. This I have seen,’ and so forth.... ‘Rattle-Snakes
have many small Teeth of which I cannot see they make any Use; for they
swallow every Thing whole; but the Teeth which poison are only four;
two on each side of their Upper-Jaws. These are bent like a Sickle,
and hang loose, as if by a Joint. Towards the setting on of these,
there is in each Tooth a little Hole, wherein you may just get in the
Point of a small Needle. And here it is that the Poison comes out and
follows the Wound made by the Point of their Teeth. They are much more
venomous in the Months of June and July than they are in March, April,
or September. The hotter the Weather the more poisonous. Neither may
we suppose they can renew their Poison as oft as they will; for we
have had a Person bit by one of these who never rightly recovered it,
and very hardly escaped with Life; and a second Person bit in the same
Place by the same Snake and received no more Harm than if bitten with a
Rat. They cast their Skins every Year and commonly abide in the Place
where the old Skin lies. These cast Skins are used for Physick, and
the Rattles are reckoned good to expedite the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">[284]</a></span> Birth.’ ... ‘Gall mixed
with Clay and made into Pills are kept for Use and accounted a noble
Remedy.’ ... ‘This Snake has two Nostrils on each Side its Nose. Their
Venom I have Reason to believe effects no Harm any otherwise than when
darted into the Wound by the Serpent’s Teeth.’</p>

<p>This description, being an early and excellent illustration of what has
since been termed ‘Practical Natural History,’ is given at length, and
because Lawson has been a good deal quoted by subsequent writers.</p>

<p>So again is Catesby, who went to Virginia in 1712, staying seven
years ‘to gratify a passionate desire to view animal and vegetable
productions in their native country.’ He was the first to figure and
to describe two distinct species. It is admitted that he did much
for natural history, and his drawings are by far the best that had
as yet appeared. Catesby therefore claims a conspicuous place among
rattlesnake historians.</p>

<p>By this time, 1731, nine or ten of the American colonies had celebrated
their first centenary, and had made considerable advances towards
civilisation. In the parts visited by Catesby a good deal of the old
English refinement marked the character and manners of the people. But
a little domestic incident in the house where he was staying is related
by him, and affords us an insight of a less attractive character in
plantation life.</p>

<p>The largest rattlesnake Catesby ever saw was eight feet long, and
weighed eight or nine pounds. ‘This Monster was gliding into the House
of Col. Blake, and had certainly taken up his Abode there undiscovered,
had not the Domestic Animals alarmed the Family with their repeated
Outcries:<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">[285]</a></span> the Hogs, Dogs, and Poultry united in their Hatred to him,
showing the greatest Consternation by erecting their Bristles and
Feathers, and showing their Wrath and Indignation surrounded him; but
carefully kept their Distance, while he, regardless of their Threats,
glided slowly along.’</p>

<p>It was not at all an uncommon occurrence for rattlesnakes to come into
houses at that time, nor indeed has it been long since then in secluded
parts.</p>

<p>Catesby himself had a narrow escape once, when he occupied a room on
the ground floor, and a rattlesnake was found snugly coiled in his bed.</p>

<p>Notwithstanding a growing acquaintance with the rattlesnake among the
F.R.S.’s, to the general public it was still almost unknown.</p>

<p>Even in the middle of the eighteenth century an itinerant exhibitor
could say what he pleased about it to a too credulous public. An
extract from an old newspaper suggests an ancestral Barnum joining
hands with a journalist to make a fortune out of one thus exhibited.
Not so much was expected of journalists in those days; but even now,
so far as snakes are concerned, a vast number of errors creep into
newspapers.</p>

<p class="pc1">‘A BEAUTIFUL RATTLESNAKE ALIVE.</p>

<p class="pbq p1">‘This exotic Animal is extremely well worthy the Observation of
the Curious: Its Eyes are of great Lustre, even equal to that of a
Diamond, and its Skin so exquisitely mottled and of such surpassing
Beauty as baffles the Art of the most celebrated Painter: It is about
five Feet long, and so sagacious, that it will rattle whenever the
Keeper commands it: There is not the least cause for Fear, though
it were at Liberty in the Room: but that the Ladies may be under no
Apprehension on that Account, it is kept in a Glass-Case. It is very
Active, and is the first ever shown alive in England.’&mdash;From <i>The
General Advertiser</i>, LONDON, Sat., Jan. 4th, 1752.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_286" id="Page_286">[286]</a></span></p>

<p class="p1">Any ‘sagacity’ displayed in this exhibition was on the part of the
keeper, who had discovered the exceeding timidity of this reptile, and
had observed that it used its rattle whenever alarmed or provoked.
However, the timidity answered very well for obedience, and no doubt
drew many spectators.</p>

<p>A notable feature in the rattlesnake was its fecundity and prevalence.</p>

<p>This we gather from all who in the early days of American history
had anything to tell us of the country and its inhabitants. Whether
the subject of their pen were Topography, Indians, or Productions, a
rattlesnake crept in. Collateral evidence of this kind, given with no
motive for exaggeration, nor even as ‘natural history,’ may therefore
be accredited.</p>

<p>A slaughter of rattlesnakes was as much an annual custom as the
slaughter of hogs. Regularly as a crop of hay came a crop of
rattlesnakes. On account of the oil manufactured from their fat, the
slaughter partook also of a commercial character; but more commonly
it was a war of extinction, like the battles with the Indians.
Usually an annual, frequently a biennial, crusade was undertaken, the
settlers being well acquainted with their habits and retreats. It was
a well-known fact that, towards the close of summer, and on the first
indication of frost, the reptiles returned simultaneously and in vast
numbers to a favourite spot. Not only hundreds but thousands make for
this winter rendezvous year after year.</p>

<p>Catlin, the Indian historian, tells us that near Wilkesbarre, in
Pennsylvania, his birth-place, was a cavern in the mountains<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_287" id="Page_287">[287]</a></span> called
Rattlesnake Den; and to this cavern the snakes made an annual
pilgrimage, collecting from vast distances, no matter what obstacles
were in their way. Across rivers and lakes, and up mountain sides,
straight to their Den they would go, and in those unapproachable
caverns lie <i>en masse</i> in a torpid state until aroused by the coming
summer, when they would venture forth again and descend into the
valleys.</p>

<p>These were the times for the grand <i>battues</i>, one of which, an event of
Catlin’s boyhood, is narrated by him.</p>

<p>One of the first spring days, when the creatures creep out to sun
themselves for only a few hours, retiring again at night, was the time
chosen for the onslaught. The snakes were known to come forth from
Rattlesnake Den on to a certain ledge of rock near their cavern; and a
council of war was held as to the best approach and mode of attack. Ten
years previously a similar war had been waged, when the reptiles had
been almost exterminated; but of late so many accidents had occurred
among the inhabitants through the fast-increasing serpents, that the
farmers agreed to climb to the den and once more reduce their numbers.
The boy Catlin was privileged to be of the party, and he was told
to creep cautiously to an overhanging rock, whence he could see the
reptiles sunning themselves on their ledge below. The rest of the party
stood in readiness, club in hand. At a signal young Catlin fired a
fowling-piece into their midst. There was a knot of them ‘like a huge
mat wound and twisted and interlocked together, with all their heads
like scores of hydras standing up from the mass.’ Into this horrible
cluster he ‘let fly,’ when the party, rushing with their clubs, broke
the spine of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_288" id="Page_288">[288]</a></span> hundreds by a single blow to each, while hundreds more
were saving themselves by a quick return to their den.</p>

<p>While counting the five or six hundred slain, and holding another
council of war on the battle-field, a rattle was heard of one which in
the death-struggle had escaped over a ledge instead of into its cave.
With a forked stick a man approached that misguided reptile and held
down its head, while another brave expert seized it by the neck so
close to its head that it could not turn and bite him.</p>

<p>It was a very large snake, and young Catlin, inspired by the sudden
thought, exclaimed, ‘Tie a powder-horn to its tail and fasten a slow
fuse to it, and let it go back into its den.’</p>

<p>‘George, you are the best hunter in the Valley of Ocquago!’ cried the
man who held the snake; and forthwith the plan was agreed upon.</p>

<p>The largest powder-horn in the party was filled to the brim from the
other horns, and tied to the snake’s tail by a string of several feet
long; and to the horn was fixed a slow fuse of about a yard in length,
made of wetted, twisted tow, in which gunpowder was rolled. This
accomplished while the reptile was still firmly held, it was then set
free close to the mouth of its den, the whole party speedily escaping
to a safe distance.</p>

<p>Listening, they heard the horn rattling over the rocky floor as the
snake was carrying it home into the midst of its comrades, when, after
the silence of a minute or so, an explosion like a clap of thunder
shook the ground on which they stood, and blue streams issued forth
between the crevices around the den, and a thick volume from its mouth.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_289" id="Page_289">[289]</a></span></p>

<p>Rattlesnake Den was thus cleared of its inhabitants for many long years.</p>

<p>Catlin affirms that the Valley of the Wyoming used to be more infested
with these terrible pests than any other portion of the globe. Every
summer the lives of persons as well as cattle were destroyed by them,
and the ‘happy little valley’ would have been rendered uninhabitable
but for the periodical <i>battues</i>.<a name="FNanchor_81_81" id="FNanchor_81_81"></a><a href="#Footnote_81_81" class="fnanchor">[81]</a></p>

<p>Howe in his Histories of Ohio and of Virginia relates many similar
facts. A Mr. Stone, one of the first settlers of the ‘Western Reserve’
along the shore of Lake Erie, has immortalized himself as a slayer of
rattlesnakes. They were ‘in great plenty along the track,’ and he being
the first to ‘survey’ the land in 1796, had the honour of doing battle
with them. In Trumbull County they abounded. One year, about the first
of May 1799, a large party armed with cudgels proceeded to a sunny
level of rock on which hosts of the reptiles had crept. Approaching
cautiously, step by step, the enemy came upon them suddenly, and then
began to cudgel with all their might. Hot and furious was the fight;
the rattles were ringing as the snakes beat a retreat up the hill, and
the ground was strewed with the slain: four hundred and eighty-six were
that day collected, most of them over five feet in length.</p>

<p>In another of these spring campaigns eight hundred rattlesnakes were
killed, including a few of their relatives the copper-head, and
hundreds more of harmless snakes of which the slayers ‘took no account.’</p>

<p>Holbrooke records that once in New York State two men<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_290" id="Page_290">[290]</a></span> in three days
killed 1104 rattlesnakes on an eastern slope of Tongue mountain.</p>

<p>Many hairbreadth escapes during these adventures form the subjects of
exciting stories in the domestic annals of American settlers, but are
becoming more and more histories of the past. In many localities where
formerly rattlesnakes swarmed, they have almost totally disappeared or
have become very rare. Probably with their friends the Indians, they
will in time become wholly extinct.</p>

<p>New species have, however, been discovered by the explorers of the new
Western States and in Tropical America, where, in the sparsely-settled
districts, they still come into houses as of yore, and where the
rattlesnake campaign is still an annual sport for the venturesome
pioneers. In 1872, two thousand of the species <i>Crotalus confluentus</i>
were killed in the Yellowstone Region.</p>

<p>One other question in the history of the rattlesnake&mdash;‘Does it swallow
its young in times of danger?’ or more correctly speaking, ‘Does
it receive its young into its œsophagus as a place of safety?’&mdash;is
considered in chap. xxvii.</p>

<p>Other discussions of modern times, both in assemblies of zoologists
and through printed correspondence, have been on the rattle, when and
why vibrated, how affected by damp, etc., all claiming a place in
rattlesnake history, but considered elsewhere in this work. A whole
volume might be written on this rattling tail, evolved out of the
scant materials of the sixteenth century into the prolific matter of
the nineteenth. You can scarcely take up one of the many scientific
journals of the United States, in which zoology forms<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_291" id="Page_291">[291]</a></span> a part, without
finding mention of a rattlesnake. Within a very few years the subject
has been popularized in our own zoological journals also.</p>

<p>In connection with the venom come of course the cures, concerning
which the experiments of Dr. Weir Mitchell form a notable point in
rattlesnake history. But serpent venom and its remedies, so far as lies
within my province to discuss them, come also in a special chapter.</p>

<p>In concluding this one, I will roughly enumerate the species of
rattlesnakes now best known. We have seen that formerly only one or
two different kinds were noticed, and the subsequent multiplication
of species is due almost as much to science and to a more careful
observation of the distinguishing features, as to the discovery of
absolutely new ones.</p>

<p>The frequent Exploring Expeditions fitted out by the United States
Government for Geographical Boundaries, Pacific Railroads, Geological
Surveys, etc., with always a zoologist on their Staff of Scientific
Men, have added much to our knowledge of natural history; and in the
Reports and Bulletins of these may be sifted out information in every
branch of Science. Thus in <i>Crotalus</i> chronicles, our two original
rattlesnakes have increased and are still increasing. In 1831, the
late Dr. J. E. Gray, of the British Museum Natural History Department,
enumerated six genera and eleven species belonging to America. In 1860,
Dr. Weir Mitchell gave about twenty species as belonging to two genera
only, and distinguished by their head scales.</p>

<p>As this book has no scientific pretensions, and as its aim is rather to
interest a large class of readers than systematically to instruct the
few, I will not attempt a list of genera and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_292" id="Page_292">[292]</a></span> species with all their
perplexing names, if indeed a true list of all the now known species
even exist. They are distinguished by the shields or plates on the
head, and by the varying tails. Some have rattles so small as barely to
entitle them to the name of <i>Crotalus</i>.</p>

<p>Then, again, a new name is frequently adopted by the discoverer of
a new feature; and a number of American genera, <i>minus</i> a rattle
altogether, are included among the <i>Crotalidæ</i>, an anomaly which will
be presently explained. Here we have to do with only the rattlesnake
proper, viz. the ‘Viper with the Bell,’ <i>Vipera caudisona</i> of Tyson,
and the <i>Crotalus</i> of Linnæus.</p>

<p>This word <i>Crotalus</i>, simply a rattle, from the Greek word <i>crotalon</i>,
and the Latin <i>crotalia</i> and <i>crotalum</i>, a kind of castanets, is as
suitable as any that could possibly have been assigned to the snake;
and most of the generic names are compounds of it: <i>Crotalophorus</i>,
rattle-bearing; <i>Crotalina</i>, little rattle; <i>Crotaloidæ</i>;
<i>Urocrotalon</i>, rattling tail; or simply <i>Crotalus</i>. Then the specific
name more especially describes the snake in colour, size, character,
locality, etc., as <i>Oregonus</i>, from Oregon; <i>Kirtlandii</i>, from Dr.
Kirtland of Ohio, who first described that species; <i>horridus</i>, from
the hideous, terrible character of this large snake; <i>miliarius</i>, a
very small one; <i>caudisona</i>, sounding tail; and so on.</p>

<p>Their geographical range is from about 45° north, to the Gulf of
Mexico, Texas, and southward; and in South America to about the same
degree of climate and temperature as in the northern latitudes. They
are most virulent in the hottest seasons, the tropical regions, and
according to their size; though, as is the case with other venomous
snakes, a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_293" id="Page_293">[293]</a></span> small species in hot weather and with a large store of venom
may be more noxious than the largest in a half-torpid state and with a
small supply of venom.</p>

<p>There is one known as the ‘Prairie rattlesnake;’ another frequents the
marshy districts of Ohio; another, the swamps of the Southern States
along the coast; a fourth is known as the ‘Western rattlesnake;’ some
of the 20 species described in the United States being more abundant in
the mountainous regions, others near the rivers.</p>

<p>In the wilder regions of Central and South America they also abound;
but less is known of them where there are no United States Exploring
Expeditions to record them.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-128.jpg" width="200" height="199"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_294" id="Page_294">[294]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-001.jpg" width="500" height="109"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XVII.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE RATTLE.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">THIS <i>Crepitaculum caude</i>, as an American has called it, has been the
theme of many speculations. Its origin and its use have been discussed
alike by the scientific and the unscientific, nor have they even now
arrived at any very definite conclusions on these two points. There
are theories as to its development, its form and size, its age and its
utility, the caprice witnessed in all of these adding to the romance
of its history; and whether its length increases by a link annually,
or on each occasion of desquamation, have been among the questions
connected with it. If we believe what the American Indians declare,
an additional joint to the rattle grows whenever a human being falls
a victim to that particular snake&mdash;a tradition more poetical than
rational. The Indians also think the rattle vibrates more in dry than
in wet weather, and are therefore cautious in traversing the woods
during rainy seasons. This belief has given rise to the idea that the
rattle is affected by damp&mdash;a fact which was affirmed so<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_295" id="Page_295">[295]</a></span> long ago
as 1722.<a name="FNanchor_82_82" id="FNanchor_82_82"></a><a href="#Footnote_82_82" class="fnanchor">[82]</a> The most reasonable clue to this is, that there may be
less to disturb the reptile at a time when all animated nature is to a
certain extent inclined to retirement and repose; for if the reptile
be disturbed, rain or no rain, the rattle vibrates. In English as well
as in American scientific journals, the subject of the rattle is ever
and again ventilated by physiologists, and new suggestions are thrown
out. In the present chapter I will endeavour to give a sort of digest
of all these theories, venturing to offer in addition the results of my
own observations. Appended is a drawing of the first rattle I ever saw
or had in my possession. It is associated with a delightful visit of
several months to some very dear friends in Iowa, and it recalls more
particularly one lovely September afternoon. We were driving along a
wild country road, where the prairie on either side was radiant with
its floral carpet, and where the Mississippi gleamed like a succession
of lakes between the wooded and picturesque bluffs that formed the
background to the east.</p>

<p>Suddenly the horses refused to advance, and without any visible reason
to <i>me</i>; but the friend who was driving us recognised, in what seemed
to be merely a little dry twig in the middle of the road, nothing less
than a young rattlesnake.</p>

<p>Now, to see a rattlesnake and to hear its rattle had been the great
ambition of my prairie sojourn, and as my friend threw the reins to his
wife and alighted to deal a death-blow, I entreated him to spare it for
a few minutes only<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_296" id="Page_296">[296]</a></span> that I might examine and hear the as yet unfamiliar
appendage.</p>

<p>Alas! the creature had no rattle. ‘It is too young: there is only
the <i>button</i>,’ as my friend called the rudimentary promise of one. I
profited by the occasion, however, to have a good though disappointed
look, not unmixed with contempt, at the juvenile Crotalus, being so
very small and unworthy the ceremony. A foot or so in length, it began
to make its escape into the long grass, when by one quick stamp of his
heel our champion disabled it.</p>

<p>Then, throwing it into a pool of water, he remounted, and the horses
fearlessly proceeded.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-296a.jpg" width="200" height="62"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">A fully developed rattle of a<br />rather small snake (life
size).</p>
</div></div>

<p>A few days after this, to compensate my disappointment, I was presented
with a ‘full-grown rattle’ from a Kentucky snake, and here it is.</p>

<p>Asking how he knew it was ‘full grown,’ my friend explained that the
links being all of a nearly uniform size, proved that the snake had
also attained a certain growth during the development of that rattle.
This will be more readily comprehended on seeing the next specimen,
which is the rattle of a Mexican snake during early and rapid growth,
and a very perfect one, presenting no flaw or friction; proving that it
has not been subject to very long or very rough usage.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-296b.jpg" width="200" height="89"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">A very perfect rattle<br />(natural size).</p>
</div></div>

<p>In texture this is scarcely so stout as the shaft of a quill, nor so
pale, but almost as transparent. As regards size, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_297" id="Page_297">[297]</a></span> terminal link or
‘button’ may be compared to the nail of a young child, the intermediate
links gradually increasing with the growth of the snake to the nails of
older children, and the largest link to that of a full-grown person.
From the form of this rattle&mdash;an accurate copy of the original&mdash;we
may infer that it grew rapidly at first, and that the snake was large
during the development of the later links.</p>

<p>The next, reduced in size, is the rattle of a snake which had attained
full growth, but from which the younger or earlier links with the
terminal ‘button’ are gone.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-297.jpg" width="400" height="84"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Portion of a long rattle, much reduced in size.</p>
</div></div>

<p>Extending this specimen by imaginary converging lines, we form an idea
of what its length might have been if perfect, probably about twenty
joints, which is a not unusual number; but we perceive at once that
a rattle, as we happen to see it, is no criterion of its age or its
original form. Rarely is a snake seen with a long rattle perfect and
entire. But whenever it gradually tapers and ends with the pointed
terminal link, we may decide that that rattle has escaped injury from
its earliest development.</p>

<p>In form it is not unsymmetrical, and in substance it is horny, like
hair, nails, quills, and hardened skin, a sort of dense and corneous
integument, yet less solid than horns and claws. The links, being
only interlocked and yet elastic, can be easily separated, and are
consequently easily injured. An animal treading on the rattle of a
snake would cause a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_298" id="Page_298">[298]</a></span> portion at least to be lost; or in being drawn
among roots and entangled vegetation, a rattle might easily get
damaged: the number of links can never, therefore, be an infallible
clue to the age of the reptile.</p>

<p>Like hair, horns, nails, it is also subject to a caprice in growth,
or to the vigour of the individual; at one time comparatively at a
stand-still, at another growing rapidly; in one season gaining perhaps
several links, in another season none.</p>

<p>Neither does the number of joints bear any relation to the casting of
the skin, any more than the growth of hair or nails depends on the
healing of a scar. The slough, cast more or less frequently, may leave
the rattle intact, or a new link may appear at such a time. Dr. Cotton,
of Tennessee, had a rattlesnake which shed its skin on an average twice
a year, and he observed a new link to the rattle on each shedding.
On the contrary, a rattlesnake at the London Zoological Gardens,
and in the collection for about ten years, had never a rattle worth
mentioning. Quite a young snake of only 15 inches when brought, it grew
into a fine healthy specimen, fully five feet long, and yet had never
more than what Americans call the button&mdash;not quite even that, but
merely an abortive pretence of unhealthy growth, as if one or two links
were consolidated. I watched that rattle for several years with much
interest. Thus it was when my attention was first drawn towards it;
and though it sometimes gave promise of growing, and once did indeed
gain another link, it soon got broken off, and never attained more than
three misshapen joints.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-298.jpg" width="150" height="115"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">All there was of it!<br />From life.</p>
</div></div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_299" id="Page_299">[299]</a></span></p>

<p>Though no rattle is ordinarily developed until the snakeling is some
months old, several cases are on record where young snakes have been
born with the ‘button,’ and even with perfectly formed links. Mr.
Benjamin Smith Barton, an American who wrote a good deal about the
Crotalus, communicated to Prof. Zimmermann in 1800 that he had found
in a parent some young ones with three rattles, <i>i.e.</i> ‘links,’ each.
Similar and more recent cases are on record.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-299.jpg" width="150" height="323"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Transparent rattle<br />(p. 296), held against<br />the light.</p>
</div></div>

<p>In colour a rattle is of a dark brown, or dull rusty black,
occasionally lighter when fresh and uninjured, and then more plainly
displaying its horny texture. In the Mexican rattle (p. 296) the
links were semi-transparent; sufficiently so to enable us to trace
the form of the interior links if held against the light. This
afforded an admirable opportunity to comprehend the structure and
the production of the sound, which is simply and truly a rattling of
these loosely-fitting links as they are partially embraced, each one
by the previous link. That is to say, each new link grows up into
its predecessor, pushing it forward towards the tip of the rattle.
Through this unusually clear rattle you can trace each link passing up
and fitting into the preceding (prior) one, just as so many thimbles
or cups would fit into each other. Only, in the case of thimbles or
cups, there is nothing to keep them in place, and the slightest shake
would detach the whole pile; whereas the lobes or bulging sections of
each link prevent any such detachment in a rattle, except by force or
accident.</p>

<p>The next is the rattle of a small Oregon snake. This,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_300" id="Page_300">[300]</a></span> as is
observable, is old and very much worn; so much so, indeed, that one has
to handle it with care. It is, however, pulled apart intentionally to
show that the links vary in form from those of the tapering specimen.
Any rattle can thus be separated without much effort, as, owing to the
elasticity of the substance, not much resistance presents itself. The
links are just loose enough to produce that sibilant effect, like the
rustling of dry leaves, or of ripe beans in a pod; or still more, like
the seed vessel of our own native plant the Yellow Rattle, <i>Rhinanthus
Crista galli</i>, and the American ‘Rattle-Box,’ <i>Crotalaria sagittalis</i>.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-300a.jpg" width="150" height="312"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Small divided rattle.</p>
</div></div>

<p>Yet just so securely fitting it is as to permit of the continual
vibration without loss of links.</p>

<p>What we <i>see</i>, therefore, is only the base or lower lobe of each joint,
the rest running up into the next two or even three bases, as may be
traced in the section here given.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-300b.jpg" width="150" height="467"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Section of rattle.</p>
</div></div>

<p>In reading about the construction of a rattle, some perplexity may
occur from the various adverbs before, behind, first, last, previous
link, etc., some referring to age, others to place. Descriptions
of the rattle met with in popular physiological works prove the
above perplexities, and verify what is so often demonstrated, viz.
the ‘inability of unscientific persons to read scientific matter
correctly.’ The ‘last’ link means the one last grown, not the end one
of the tail; ‘pushing the preceding one <i>forward</i>’ is not towards the
<i>head</i> of the reptile, but literally <i>outward</i> and <i>backward<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_301" id="Page_301">[301]</a></span></i> towards
the tip of the tail. ‘Previous’ may mean in time, or the age of the
link, or it may mean position; but a knowledge of the development
assists the comprehension of such passages.</p>

<p>In the above illustrations it will be seen that not only do rattles
differ in form in various species of snakes, but that the links
themselves differ in form in one and the same rattle. Some of them are
broader than others, some wider, and some more compressed. In all the
above drawings I carefully and faithfully copied the originals. And
in this variability we can only refer again to claws, nails, horns,
feathers, etc., which are seen to differ in the same individual,
according to health, season, or accident.</p>

<p>Where great numbers of rattlesnakes have been killed in one locality,
as, for instance, during the ‘spring campaigns,’ their tails
have presented on an average from fifteen to twenty links each.
Holbrooke<a name="FNanchor_83_83" id="FNanchor_83_83"></a><a href="#Footnote_83_83" class="fnanchor">[83]</a> has seen one of twenty-one links. A Crotalus at the
London Reptilium had twenty-five links at one time; then ten of them
got broken off, but still a respectably-sized rattle remained. The
longer the rattle, the greater the risk of injury. Oliver Wendell
Holmes, in his wonderful story <i>Elsie Venner</i>, states that a snake
in the locality where the Rocklands ‘Rattlesnake Den’ existed, had
forty joints in its rattle, and was supposed, after Indian traditions,
to have killed forty people. He tells us that the inhabitants of
those parts were remarkable for acute hearing even in old age, from
the practice of keeping their ears open for the sound of the rattle
whenever they were walking through grass or in the woods. And whenever
they heard<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_302" id="Page_302">[302]</a></span> the rattling of a dry bean-pod, they would exclaim, ‘Lord,
have mercy upon us!’ the sound so strongly resembling that of the
dreaded Crotalus.</p>

<p>Another American naturalist records a snake with forty-four links
to its rattle, but adds that this occurrence is rare and ‘a great
curiosity.’ So one would imagine, and that the fortunate possessor of
such an ensign must have flourished in smooth places. More favoured
still was a snake mentioned in the vol. of the <i>Philosophical
Transactions</i> just now quoted, and in which Paul Dudley had ‘heard it
attested by a Man of Credit that he had killed a Rattlesnake that had
between 70 and 80 Rattles (<i>i.e.</i> links), and with a sprinkling of grey
Hairs, like Bristles, all over its Body.’ As this venerable Crotalus
must have rusticated nearly two hundred years ago, we must accept the
tale or tail with caution.</p>

<p>The family of the <i>Crotalidæ</i>, it will be borne in mind, embraces a
large number of serpents with only a rudimentary rattle; a number with
only the horny spine (see p. 176); and a few with a rattle so small
even when fully developed, that they are received into the family by
courtesy rather than by their ‘sounding tail.’</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-302.jpg" width="100" height="475"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<p>A small snake with this pretence of a rattle is dangerous because it is
so indistinctly heard.</p>

<p>This is also the case with <i>Crotalus miliarius</i>, whose rattle is so
feeble as to be scarcely audible a few feet off.</p>

<p>So much for the size of rattles. Now for the development of them.</p>

<p>The theory that the rattle is the remains of cast-off cuticle, as some
herpetologists have supposed, may be dismissed at<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_303" id="Page_303">[303]</a></span> once; for what would
cause such vestiges to harden into a complicated and symmetrical form?</p>

<p>To Dumeril we owe some of our best conceptions of the growth of the
rattle, which, whether it has or has not been evolved from the mere
horny spine that terminates the tails of so many snakes, has certainly
<i>now</i> an express provision for its production.</p>

<p>Like hair, claws, or nails, the rattle is horny matter excreted and
hardened. In his <i>Elementary Lessons in Physiology</i>, Prof. Huxley
shows us how in the growth of a nail new epidermic cells are added to
the base, constraining it to move forward. ‘The nail, thus constantly
receiving additions from below and from behind, slides forward over
its bed and projects beyond the end of the finger.’ If the reader will
look at his finger nail, and suppose the end bone of the Crotalus spine
to be the ‘bed’ of the nail, he will to a certain extent be able to
comprehend how the rattle grows out; but that the links become detached
in succession is a phenomenon so astonishing and at the same time so
difficult to comprehend, that few naturalists have ventured to state
positively how this occurs. Conjecturally only and diffidently do I,
therefore, presume to offer a supposition; and if my readers will
once more pardon reference to human nails, and lend the aid of their
imagination, they may be able to evolve a true theory out of my crude
idea.</p>

<p>The young readers of <i>Aunt Judy’s Magazine</i> were also, a few years
ago,<a name="FNanchor_84_84" id="FNanchor_84_84"></a><a href="#Footnote_84_84" class="fnanchor">[84]</a> invited to lend the aid of their pink little finger nails to
the illustrative development of a supposed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_304" id="Page_304">[304]</a></span> rattle; and we will again
imagine the whole tip of a finger to be covered with a round nail-cap,
proceeding from the first joint, and to have grown so from birth. In
growing out, this curious, cup-like nail, being never cut, would become
hollow like a thimble. Pointed or tapering it would of course be,
because, as the baby finger grew, the base or new portion of nail grew
larger with it. We will also suppose that the joint whence the nail
sprang was in constant activity, and so articulated that it <i>could</i>
move with a quick and regular action or vibration; the hollow nail-cap,
having attained a certain size, would become withered, and (as the
constant bending of a piece of card or metal in time divides it) would
be worn, and at length detached at its base. Meanwhile the growth of
nail has not been arrested, but a new cap is forming within. The old,
dry, and withered cap has now nothing to retain it, and would drop off,
on account of its simple, conical form, like a loose-fitting thimble.
But Dumeril explains to us that the terminal bones of the rattlesnake’s
spine present a peculiar form, several of them coalescing.</p>

<p class="pbq p1">‘Dans les Crotales cette extremité de la queue, au lieu d’être
pointue, se trouve comme tronquée, et, par une bizarrerie que nous
n’expliquons pas, il paraîtrait que les trois dernières pièces de la
colonne vertébrale se seraient soudées entre elles, et comme aplaties
pour composer un seul os triangulaire, avec trois bourrelets latéraux
simulant des restes d’apophyses transverses des vertèbres, ainsi
qu’on les voir souvent dans les trois dernières pièces du coccyx
chez l’homme. Cet os anormale a été disséqué chez un Crotale, on a
reconnu qu’il est recouvert d’une sorte de matière cartilagineuse dans
laquelle aurait été secretée la substance cornée, comme un epiderme
solide, qui conserve en effet extérieurement la forme de la pièce
osseuse, sur laquelle elle a été en quelque sorte moulée et qu’elle<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_305" id="Page_305">[305]</a></span>
semble destinée ainsi à protéger contre l’exfoliation, comme cela
s’observe dans ceux des animaux ruminants dont la corne revêt les
chevilles osseuse du véritable coronal prolongé en pointe et devenu de
cette façon une arme d’attaque, et surtout de defence.’<a name="FNanchor_85_85" id="FNanchor_85_85"></a><a href="#Footnote_85_85" class="fnanchor">[85]</a></p>

<p class="p1">Dumeril also tells us that the peculiar structure of those few terminal
vertebræ, with their knobs or pads (‘<i>bourrelets</i>’) upon which the skin
is moulded, tends to a movement lateral rather than up and down,&mdash;that
quick action which we perceive when the rattle is being vibrated.
Thus the horny covering takes the form of this bone with its lobes
or bulges, which instead of permitting the supposed cup-like nail to
fall off as in our finger illustration, causes the links as they are
pushed out to hang or cling together; and we can only suppose that the
constant action loosens, and not only loosens when dead or detached,
but loosens, that is to say, enlarges, the link while growing. For if
you examine the spine of a skeleton Crotalus and the rattle that grew
upon that spine, you will perceive that the links are a great deal
larger than the ‘<i>pièce osseuse sur laquelle elle a été en quelque
sorte moulée</i>.’</p>

<p>There is one other peculiarity observable in a detached rattle, which I
cannot pretend to explain in any way. If you hold one up by its base or
largest link, you will find it invariably hangs in a slight curve and
not perpendicularly. You can straighten it, but you will not be able to
curve it in the opposite direction, proving that it naturally inclines
one way, whether to the right or the left of the animal while living, I
cannot assert. But it is a curious feature, and one that can no doubt
be accounted for by scientific observers. Thus,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_306" id="Page_306">[306]</a></span> as in the illustration
below, you can curve a rattle so as to discern the interior links on
one side, but not on the other. I have made the attempt with many
rattles, but always with the same result. The centre fig. below is a
section.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-306.jpg" width="400" height="329"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Natural position when held.<span class="vh">&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</span>Straightened by force.</p>
<p class="pc">This fine specimen, natural size, and also the Tapering Rattle, both
from Mexico, were lent to me by J. G. Braden, Esq. of Lewes, and copied
accurately.]</p>
</div></div>

<p>Not the least important of all the speculations to which the rattling
tail has given rise, is the question, ‘Of what use is it?’ for we know
that nothing exists in vain. Apart from the fact that the American
savages make some medicinal use of the rattle, this elaborated,
curious, and not unsightly instrument has as yet had no special and
determined office assigned to it to the advantage of its possessor,
though theories regarding it are numerous.</p>

<p>Formerly, when only the dangerous powers of the reptile<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_307" id="Page_307">[307]</a></span> were
understood, it was sufficient to say of it in a tone of pious
thankfulness, that the Almighty had so armed this serpent as a warning
to its enemies. Some of those early writers introduce the rattlesnake
to us as the most benevolent and disinterested of dumb animals,
conscientiously living up to his duties, obedient to that ‘peculiar
Providence’ which has given him a rattle ‘to warn the inadvertent
intruder of danger.’ ‘He maketh such a noise that he catcheth very
few,’ an evidence of imprudence wholly inconsistent with his inherited
‘wisdom.’ Indeed, between the character given of this ‘superb reptile’
by Chateaubriand, and the self-sacrificing qualities assigned it by
some other writers, we can only wonder how a hungry rattlesnake ever
managed to survive at all, and how it is that the race is not extinct
long ago.</p>

<p>That the early and unscientific travellers, speaking from a thankful
experience of having escaped a rattlesnake through <i>hearing</i> where
it was, should seek no further for the utility of the rattle, is not
much to be wondered at. But so lately as 1871 one of our popular
physiologists, whose work is a textbook, has expatiated on this
theme so positively that it is necessary to quote his words on this
‘admirable provision of nature,’ which apparently has elaborated a
unique appendage for the purpose of starving its proprietor!</p>

<p>‘The intention of this organ is so obvious, that the most obtuse
cannot contemplate it without at once appreciating the beauty of the
contrivance.... It (the snake) announces the place of its concealment,
even when at rest, to caution the inadvertent intruder against too near
an approach.’<a name="FNanchor_86_86" id="FNanchor_86_86"></a><a href="#Footnote_86_86" class="fnanchor">[86]</a></p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_308" id="Page_308">[308]</a></span></p>

<p>If all the venomous serpents were thus beneficently armed (the cobras
of India especially), the crusade against snakes would be at an end, or
never need have been instituted; for supposing the heedless loiterer to
have been a bird, squirrel, guinea-pig, or any of the lesser mammalia
which form the food of most snakes, these happy creatures would have
had the world to themselves long ago, while vipers had kindly starved
themselves out of all traces.</p>

<p>‘Every creature of God is good,’ we must repeat and ponder over. Even
a deadly rattlesnake, and every part of that rattlesnake, has its
appointed use.</p>

<p>The ‘inadvertence’ (in this instance on the part of the writer who thus
expressed himself) has not been without its use as well, for a more
careful attention has been given to the rattle in consequence; and much
controversy has since arisen among some of the ablest herpetologists,
particularly in America, where much that was new and suggestive soon
found its way into the scientific journals.</p>

<p>Briefly to summarize some of the arguments, I will repeat a few of them
as suggested by some well-known naturalists. In that able periodical,
the <i>American Naturalist</i>, vol. vi. 1872, the subject was thoroughly
discussed. Professor Shaler, in a paper on ‘The Rattlesnake and Natural
Selection,’ admitted that whereas he had hitherto thought and taught
that the rattle did more harm than good to its owner, he now knew that
the sound is so similar to that of the stridulating insects upon which
some birds feed, that he had no doubt of its use in attracting these
to the snake. He himself had mistaken the sound for a locust. ‘Does
it invite its enemies or entice its prey?’ he asks. ‘Those snakes
that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_309" id="Page_309">[309]</a></span> can best attract birds, are best fed.’ In reply to this, a Mr.
J. W. Beal of Michigan affirmed that he had often mistaken the sound
for grasshoppers; which educed many similar accounts from persons who
had been in danger of treading on a Crotalus through ‘inadvertent
approach,’ supposing that only an insect were there. A child had taken
it for a cicada, some one else for a locust, etc. Any one who is
acquainted with the wild parts of the American Continent, is familiar
with the ceaseless chirps and whizzings of those ubiquitous insects
which are furnished with the stridulating apparatus, and which lead you
almost to expect to see a scissors-grinder behind every tree. These
are all the more deceptive on account of their varying cadences, now
louder, now softer, approaching or receding, just as the sound of the
rattle varies by increased or less rapid vibrations, or according to
its individual size and strength. In a paper read before the Zoological
Society by Mr. A. R. Wallace in 1871, he invited attention to this fact
of the resemblance between the sound of the rattle and the singing of a
cricket, and that its use seemed to be to decoy insectivorous animals.</p>

<p>Dr. Elliott Coues is also of this opinion, viz. that to an unpractised
ear the sound cannot be distinguished from the crepitation of the large
Western grasshopper. A case has been reported, he tells us, of a bird
observed to be drawn within reach, thinking it was a grasshopper. Dr.
Coues also affirms that the sound has been heard when no perceptible
irritation disturbed the snake.<a name="FNanchor_87_87" id="FNanchor_87_87"></a><a href="#Footnote_87_87" class="fnanchor">[87]</a></p>

<p>Thus we see that the ‘inadvertent intruder,’ so far from<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_310" id="Page_310">[310]</a></span> being warned
away, is beguiled to his injury, both in the case of human beings not
quick to discriminate sounds, or not having rattlesnakes in their
minds, and with animals in their early experience who perhaps hear one
for the first time.</p>

<p>Another question is, ‘Does the snake sound its rattles when seeking to
capture prey?’</p>

<p>The editor of the <i>American Naturalist</i> in the volume already quoted,
thinks they do not systematically set up a rattling for this purpose;
and as far as observation of snakes in confinement can be of use, this
opinion may be confirmed. Probably a captive snake may have learned
by experience that, hungry or not, it must wait for its periodical
dinner, and that its ‘dinner bell’ avails it nothing. Nevertheless, we
do not find that the snake uses its rattle upon food being placed in
its cage, unless the rat or the guinea-pig come tumbling unexpectedly
or unceremoniously upon the snake, when it would sound its rattle in
alarm; but it waits quietly, silently, rather receding than advancing
towards the destined prey, and then, after cautious observation,
stealthily approaching to give the fatal bite. Mr. Arthur Nicols,
author of <i>Zoological Notes</i>, etc., has there discussed this point,
but dismisses it by declaring he has no faith in ‘the dinner-bell
theory.’<a name="FNanchor_88_88" id="FNanchor_88_88"></a><a href="#Footnote_88_88" class="fnanchor">[88]</a></p>

<p>Nor can the rattle be designed to terrify enemies or as a menace, since
the sound would invite the attack of those very animals which the snake
has most cause to fear, namely goats, hogs, and the large carnivorous
birds that devour it. If, besides, it were used as a warning, why have
the young ones, which are more in need of protection, no rattle?</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_311" id="Page_311">[311]</a></span></p>

<p>Darwin, in the sixth edition of his <i>Origin of Species</i>, 1872, writes
as follows, p. 162:&mdash;</p>

<p>‘It is admitted that the rattlesnake has a poison-fang for its own
defence and for the destruction of its prey; but some authors suppose
that at the same time it is furnished with a rattle for its own injury,
namely to warn its prey. I would almost as soon believe that the cat
curls the end of its tail when preparing to spring in order to warn
the doomed mouse. It is a much more probable view that the rattlesnake
uses its rattle, the cobra expands its frill, and the puffadder swells
whilst hissing so loudly and harshly, in order to alarm the many birds
and beasts which are known to attack even the most venomous species.
Snakes act on the same principle which makes a hen ruffle her feathers
and expand her wings when a dog approaches her chickens.’ This profound
thinker, then, is one of those who include the rattle among ‘the many
ways by which animals endeavour to frighten away their enemies.’</p>

<p>We may reasonably conclude that the <i>Crotalus</i>, in common with other
snakes, also with dogs and cats, expresses a variety of feelings with
its sounding tail, fear being the most predominant one. The Indians
recognise its utility as a warning by gratefully abstaining from
killing one that rattles. They superstitiously regard it as protective
to themselves if not to the snake, and they in turn carefully protect
the reptile. Backwoodsmen display little or no fear when they <i>hear</i>
the <i>Crotalus</i>, and though they do not spare it, regard it with less
bitter animosity than they display towards its cousin the Copper-head;
because, as a facetious writer has testified of it, ‘it never bites
without provocation,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_312" id="Page_312">[312]</a></span> living up to the laws of honour, and by his
rattles giving challenge in an honourable way.’</p>

<p>That the sound has a language of its own is known by the fact that
when disturbed and one rattle is sprung, all other rattlesnakes within
hearing take up the chorus. That the sexes also understand each other
through crotaline eloquence is generally believed. In fact, to each
other and to themselves they have, no doubt, as many variations in the
use of their rattles, as any other animal in the expression of its
tail; and probably all the above enumerated examples are at one time or
another its legitimate uses. Those who have most closely observed them
have detected a variety of cadences in one and the same rattle.</p>

<p>Those also who have carefully watched rattlesnakes under various
circumstances, must perceive that timidity is one of the strongest
features in this reptile. In chap. xxx. I will give examples of this.
Already convinced by observation, I attributed to excessive timidity
the chief agitation of the rattle, when writing on the Ophidia in the
<i>Dublin University Magazine</i>, December 1875, and again in <i>Aunt Judy’s
Magazine</i>, July 1877. Fear causes some snakes to puff themselves;
others to expand or flatten the body; fear excites the cobra to erect
its anterior ribs and display its ‘hood;’ and, above all, fear causes
most snakes to hiss. Fear is coupled with anger, in these attempts
to do their best towards repelling the offender. Dr. E. Coues, in
speaking of the rattle, supposes it to have possibly ‘resulted in the
course of time from the continual agitation of the caudal extremity
of these <i>highly nervous and irritable creatures</i>.’ Dr. Weir Mitchell
has known captive<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_313" id="Page_313">[313]</a></span> snakes to vibrate the rattle for hours at a time;
and probably, if there were opportunities of becoming more intimately
acquainted with crotaline idiosyncrasies, we should discover some
snakes to be more or less afflicted with temper, nervousness, terror,
or other emotions which induce an animal to express its feelings in its
own way.</p>

<p>But the most remarkable peculiarity in this snake is that no other
way <i>is</i> in its power: <i>a rattlesnake never hisses</i>. Throughout the
numerous arguments, theories, explanations, and suggestions, there is
such an absence of allusion to this fact that we must suppose it to
be very little known. Says Dumeril in describing <i>les petits étuis
cornés, comparé à celui que feraient plusieurs grelots peu sonorés:
‘Les Crotales diffèrent de tous les autres serpents connus par la
faculté qu’ils ont de produire des sons sourds et rapides, cu plutôt
des bruits continus et prolongés à l’aide d’un organe spécial, qui
supléerait&mdash;pour ainsi dire&mdash;à la voix, dont ces serpents sont toujours
privés.’</i><a name="FNanchor_89_89" id="FNanchor_89_89"></a><a href="#Footnote_89_89" class="fnanchor">[89]</a> But the sibilations of the rattle are often so like
hissing that they have been compared to the whistling of wind among
the leaves, to the escape of water through a pipe, to the whizzing of
insects, the rattling of seed pods, and many similar sounds, showing at
the same time the character of the noise and its variability.</p>

<p>Concisely recapitulating what this rattle does, we understand that in
the first place it is a substitute for the voice&mdash;so far as hissing can
be called voice; and that what would cause other excessively nervous,
timid, terrified snakes to hiss, causes the rattle to vibrate. It may
attract insectivorous birds; it may alarm other timid creatures; it
may summon its<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_314" id="Page_314">[314]</a></span> mate; and, as is well known, it has sympathy with its
mate; for a second rattle is almost sure to be sounded, and they have
been observed to sound in pairs or numbers responsively&mdash;it may be
to express anger, fear, and for aught we know <i>pleasure</i>, in a state
of liberty and enjoyment, feelings expressed by the tail of other
creatures.</p>

<p>Why it is formed as it is, so wholly different from all other tails;
from what it has been evolved; and how long in evolving,&mdash;all these are
problems to be solved by future Darwins and future Evolutionists.</p>

<p>This chapter, therefore, closes with only feeble speculations after
feeble attempts to explain an inexplicable phenomenon. The simplest and
truest solution seems to be found in those few words, ‘<i>qui supléerait
à la voix, dont ces serpents sont toujours privés</i>.’</p>

<p>Again, we wonder whether in the non-hissing serpents any peculiarity of
trachea may be observed.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-314.jpg" width="200" height="86"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_315" id="Page_315">[315]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-107.jpg" width="500" height="119"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XVIII.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE INTEGUMENT&mdash;‘HORNS,’ AND OTHER EPIDERMAL APPENDAGES.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap06">HAVING decided that in animal organization nothing exists without its
especial use; assuming also that the peculiar development of cuticle
forming the rattle is to supply the deficiency of voice, we are next
induced to examine those other appendages in serpents which are also
modifications of the integument, such as the ‘horns’ of the Cerastes,
the tentacles, snout-protuberances, and developments occasionally seen
about the head of snakes, and which have all, no doubt, their uses.</p>

<p>‘Serpents are naked,’ says Günther&mdash;that is, they have no separate
epidermal productions in the way of fur, feathers, hair, or wool,
and all the variations of form in scales are but the folds of the
epidermis.<a name="FNanchor_90_90" id="FNanchor_90_90"></a><a href="#Footnote_90_90" class="fnanchor">[90]</a> The ‘variations of form’ include, therefore, the
appendages above mentioned.</p>

<p>The heads of most snakes are covered with non-imbricated plates or
shields. The form and position of these shields are in a great measure
used in classification; ‘are of the greatest<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_316" id="Page_316">[316]</a></span> value for distinction
of species and genera.’<a name="FNanchor_91_91" id="FNanchor_91_91"></a><a href="#Footnote_91_91" class="fnanchor">[91]</a> For this reason each and all of the head
shields are specially named.</p>

<p>Ophiologists differ slightly in distinguishing them as regards
assigning the exact position of some of the shields, which, like all
other ophidian features, vary in closely allied species. As, for
example, while one naturalist may decide that a certain shield is
exactly over the eye, another may consider it somewhat to the right or
the left.</p>

<p>Günther’s classification being the one now generally adopted, I copy
the names assigned by him, and the diagrams given in his work.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-316.jpg" width="400" height="245"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc"><i>Fig. 1.</i> Top of the head of a Colubrine snake. <i>r</i>, rostral; <i>f’</i>,
anterior frontal; <i>f</i>, posterior frontal; <i>v</i>, vertical; <i>s</i>,
supraciliary; <i>o</i>, occipital; <i>t</i>, temporal.</p>
<p class="pc"><i>Fig. 2.</i> Profile of the same. <i>t</i>, temporal; <i>p</i>, posterior ocular or
orbital; <i>a</i>, anterior ocular or præorbital; <i>l</i>, loreal; <i>n</i>, nasals;
<i>uu</i>, upper labials; **, lower labials.</p>
<p class="pc"><i>Fig. 3.</i> Under side of the same. **, lower labials; <i>cc</i>,
chin-shields; <i>m</i>, mental or median lower labial.</p>
</div></div>

<p>It will be observed that some of these shields can be seen both in the
profile and the others as well; as, for instance, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_317" id="Page_317">[317]</a></span> temporal and the
labial or lip shields. The study of them is simplified by the initial
letter of each name being used in reference to them. The names used
also speak for themselves; as <i>mental</i>, the chin shield; <i>nasals</i>, near
the nostril; <i>rostral</i>, the beak shields.</p>

<p>Ophiologists in deciding species, etc., enumerate those which are more
than a pair as ‘upper labials’ so many, ‘lower labials’ so many. In
some snakes these shields are so large as to cover nearly the entire
head; in others, they are almost inconspicuously small, or absent
altogether, and much varied, as we shall see.</p>

<p>In the vipers the head is generally covered with small, rigid,
imbricated, or overlapping scales instead of plates, and in some
the scales are so extremely fine and closely arranged as almost
to represent short bristles. This is noticeable in the African
‘nose-horned viper’ (<i>Vipera nasicornis</i>), p. 322, where they present a
curiously complicated structure.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-317.jpg" width="250" height="90"
         alt=""
         title="" />
<table id="tc5" summary="tc5">
 <tr>
  <td class="tdc">Magnified carinated scale.</td>
  <td><span class="vh">&mdash;</span></td>
  <td class="tdc">Magnified<br />head-scale of<br /><i>Vipera nasicornis</i>,<br />of the
coloured<br /> illustration.</td>
 </tr>
</table>
</div>

<p>Too minute to examine except under the magnifying-glass, or to attempt
to illustrate, we can convey only a general idea of these curious viper
scales, which to the touch are spinous, and rough as a coarse brush.
They must form an unpleasant perch for a bird, if it be true that the
latter is enticed by the horns of some vipers to come and peck at them,
as at a worm. These rigid head-scales become gradually larger and more
simple on the body, but are still comparatively small for so large a
serpent. In some few of the viperine snakes, plates are present as
well as the fine scales, though chiefly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_318" id="Page_318">[318]</a></span> about the nose and mouth,
exceptions which are now and then found in non-venomous ones also.
The preceding three illustrations are the head shields of a Colubrine
snake, in which a greater uniformity prevails. Below are given four
other types, though even here variations are constantly occurring.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-318.jpg" width="400" height="170"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<p><i>Fig. a.</i> One of the Indian <i>Crotalidæ</i>. It has two conspicuous
supraciliary shields, two equally conspicuous anterior frontals over
the nostril. The rest are small, and those on the top are absent
altogether. The scales are all finely carinated.</p>

<p><i>Fig. b.</i> The head of a Colubrine snake in which the same scales appear
as those in Fig. 1 of the preceding page, viz. two orbitals, etc., but
are all much smaller, and do not therefore more than half cover the
head.</p>

<p><i>Fig. c.</i> The head of a sea snake, which as to design is really pretty,
and, as Günther affirms, so different from land snakes in respect to
head shields, that without any further investigation an ophiologist can
at once distinguish the <i>hydrophidæ</i>.</p>

<p><i>Fig. d.</i> The head of a viper in which only very small supraciliary
and nasal (or anterior frontal) shields are seen. The<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_319" id="Page_319">[319]</a></span> angular form of
the viperine head is here noteworthy. In some of the Tropical American
viperine species (the <i>Crotalidæ</i>) the angular head is so marked as
to be separated into a genus&mdash;the <i>Trigonocephali</i>, three-cornered
heads. One head is sagittate or arrow-shaped to such an extent that the
serpent is known as the <i>Fer de lance</i>, the dreaded <i>Trigonocephalus
lanceolatus</i> of the Antilles. There are <i>Trigonocephali</i> among the
Indian Thanatophidia also.</p>

<p>One other very remarkable exception must not be omitted&mdash;namely, that
in pythons may be seen an angular head, which makes the neck thin and
conspicuous, only in a less degree; and also the absence of large head
shields. In addition to this, many of the pythons have particularly
short and very pointed tails&mdash;three singular viperine features in
non-venomous snakes, which can only be inherited from a common ancestry.</p>

<p>Another caprice is seen in the carinated or keel-shaped body scales,
which are found in venomous and non-venomous, land and water, ground
and tree snakes indifferently; though I think one may be safe in
affirming that none of the true vipers have unkeeled and polished
scales. Nicholson has observed that in several allied species, some
have and some have not the keel, and that those without do as well as
those with. ‘The history of the keel is not known,’ says this author.
In appearance it reminds one of the mid-rib of a leaf or of a feather,
and may probably be an inherited feature in common with birds whose
reptilian ancestry in process of ages had fluttered their scales into
feathers. In fact, in many snakes where no keel is found, there is
some slight indication of a centre line, even<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_320" id="Page_320">[320]</a></span> if it take the form of
a groove or depression. In the <i>Tropidonoti</i> the keel is so developed
as to distinguish the group; yet many with keels have comparatively
smooth skins. The carinated scales of vipers (from <i>carina</i>, a keel)
are sharply defined, like the keel at the prow of a ship, or like the
breast-bone of the swift-flying birds which Mr. Sclater, in one of
his zoological lectures, described as the carinate birds. It is these
sharply-defined, stiff; and dull scales belonging to the vipers which
produce the rustling noise when the snake is agitated, as described in
the little Indian <i>Echis carinata</i> in the chapter on hissing. In the
<i>Cerastes</i> I have witnessed the same agitated convolutions accompanied
by the audible rustling produced by the rough scales. See illus. p. 317.</p>

<p>What are called ‘horns’ in some of the African vipers are
curiously-modified scales, which, under close examination, present the
appearance of half-curled leaves, sometimes of ears, like those of a
rabbit or a mouse. Being only cuticle, and liable to injury, these
‘horns’ vary in size and colour as well as form.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-320.jpg" width="200" height="161"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">The sloughed horns of<br /><i>Vipera nasicornis</i> (exact size).</p>
</div></div>

<p>The accompanying figure is from the slough of the <i>Vipera nasicornis</i>
of the coloured illustration. They were not reversed in desquamation,
but came off with a portion of the fine spiny head scales. They were
so dry and shrivelled at the time, that it is hard to conceive how
they could possibly be reversed, the rest of the bristly head-scales
peeling off in pieces. Yet we cannot conclude from this that the horns
are <i>never reversed</i> in sloughing; the individual in question having
undergone long captivity in a close box during her journey from West
Africa, and arriving at the Zoological Gardens in such a miserable
plight that it was difficult to distinguish species or colouring for
many days. In this condition she remained for five weeks, when one fine
Sunday afternoon she presented the Society with forty-six viperlings.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-320f.jpg" width="400" height="257"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">VIPERA NASICORNIS AND YOUNG ONE.<br />
<span class="reduct">AFRICA.<br />
Mother over five feet long, Viperling 9 inches.</span></p>
</div></div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_321" id="Page_321">[321]</a></span></p>

<p>Soon after this event she discarded her way-worn and bedraggled
garment, and shone resplendent in gorgeous colouring, as presented to
the reader in the coloured illustration.</p>

<p>Her portrait was not taken until some weeks afterwards, when the horns
were therefore a little dry and shrivelled again. With the new dress
they presented a well-defined and perfect curve, tapering to a point,
and without any break in their outline. By degrees they became curled
in the manner here represented. Her colours were of a rich prismatic
hue on the sides, where the brilliant tints are so blended that to
paint them is impossible. Only on the back and in the darker markings
can the pattern be fairly represented. Her children all resembled her
in their rich tints, and were so handsome that one almost forgot their
evil propensities.</p>

<p>Forty of them died within a week. I begged hard for one of the
deceased. The keeper of course had no power in his hands. All were
wanted for scientific experimentalists. Alas, I was no scientist, but
only a woman! The following Sunday, when I was at the Gardens, the
forty-first baby viper had just died. The Superintendent ‘happened
along,’ and was greeted with another appeal from me. He would ‘consider
of it’ and let me know ‘to-morrow.’ ‘Oh, why not<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_322" id="Page_322">[322]</a></span> <i>now</i>?’ pleaded the
reader’s devoted servant. ‘You can’t want forty-one little dead vipers!’</p>

<p>Suddenly to the rescue appeared on the scene no less a personage
than Dr. Günther, and to him I urged my request. ‘Well,’ said he in
response to my eagerness, ‘one of Our Council is here, and’&mdash;Yes, the
F.Z.S. referred to had, with the Superintendent, just passed the iron
barrier to view the interesting little survivors, and Dr. Günther
followed, while I discreetly remained outside. My suspense was not of
long duration, for soon reappeared the amiable Superintendent daintily
carrying a little paper bag which might have contained bon-bons.
‘Fortunately,’ said he, ‘two of Our Council happen to be here, and so,’
etc., and I became the happy possessor of the scarcely cold viperling,
here faithfully represented by the side of its mother. Exultantly I
carried it off to a sequestered spot,&mdash;thinking chiefly of <i>you</i>, dear
readers,&mdash;and examined its ‘horns,’ which wore the appearance of an
ornamental top-knot rather than horns. They were like a bow, or two
little ears, or half-unfolded leaves. Its colouring was gorgeous, but
the pattern is too fine and complicated to represent on so small a
scale. The black triangular mark on the head of both mother and child
was like velvet in its density. Nor was this appearance lessened
under the lens; for quickly I ran off with my treasure, and spent
a delightful ‘evening at home’ in studying its ‘points,’ not even
excepting those of tongue and fangs. The former is represented on p.
120, and the latter on p. 360. The other results of my investigations
come under their separate heads in this book.</p>

<p>Another of the horned serpents, <i>Vipera cornuta</i>, has a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_323" id="Page_323">[323]</a></span> cluster of
leaf-like scales in three distinct pairs decorating its nose. These in
the individual at the Zoological Gardens were particularly ear-like,
and there was a remarkable peculiarity about them which was not found
in either of the other horned specimens when dead. It was, that when
one horn was moved divergently with the finger, its fellow moved
<i>without being touched</i> to correspond, and when let go <i>both</i> sprang
back to their original position. I at first was merely feeling and
examining them when this singularly sympathetic movement arrested my
attention. Then I tried it with each of the six scales or ‘horns’
several times, and always with the same result. Whichever one of them
was held back, the opposite one diverged at a corresponding angle.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-323.jpg" width="400" height="118"
         alt=""
         title="" />
<table id="tc6" summary="tc6">
 <tr>
  <td class="tdc">1. Natural position.</td>
  <td class="tdc">2. Three held back to their utmost.</td>
  <td class="tdc">3. Three held back partly.</td>
 </tr>
</table>
</div>

<p>Their natural position is nearly erect, and when one horn&mdash;say the
longest to the right in Fig. 1&mdash;was pressed or pulled outwards, we
might suppose that in a dead specimen it would drag its fellow that way
also, should any movement at all take place; instead of which, it flew
off in the opposite direction, like two negative or two positive poles
repelling each other. If I pressed the three to the right as much as in
the centre figure, the other three receded similarly to the left. Each
pair acted in concert in this remarkable manner, or each two pairs, or
all three pairs.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_324" id="Page_324">[324]</a></span></p>

<p>The three sketches are given merely in illustration of a phenomenon
which I cannot attempt to explain or even to comprehend. They
were drawn from memory, and are not therefore offered as exact
representations, though near enough to serve our purpose. The movement
seems to argue some peculiar muscular or nervous connection between
each pair. The serpent had not been long dead; and as no others of
this species have since been at the Gardens, I cannot tell whether
the same sympathetic movement would be seen in the living viper. I
have attentively watched the horns of the other vipers, but never
detected the slightest voluntary action in them. Nor do the horns of
<i>V. nasicornis</i> respond to the touch in the same way. A third of the
horned vipers is the <i>Cerastes</i> of classic times. Illustrators of books
from descriptions only have presented us with this serpent adorned
with horns like a young heifer. They are simply scaly appendages like
the rest, but when perfect do certainly curve backwards and upwards
in a rather bovine fashion. It happened that a <i>Cerastes</i> was brought
to the Gardens just after the six-horned viper had died, affording me
a happy opportunity of examining it. It was of this viper that Pliny
wrote: ‘It moves its little horns, often 4 in number, to attract
birds, the rest of its body lying concealed.’ It is the habit of all
those inhabiting sandy deserts thus to hide themselves, probably to
escape the scorching, drying sunshine, and with perhaps the nose and
upper part of the head exposed for breathing. I have carefully watched
several of the horned vipers for a long while together, but have never
detected the slightest volitional movement in their horns. A bird might
come and peck at them, nevertheless. Another belonging<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_325" id="Page_325">[325]</a></span> to South Africa
(<i>Lophophrys</i>) has a bunch of irregular and much shorter horns standing
erect and apparently unpaired. Incipient horny scales often accompany
the regular pairs, making it difficult to decide exactly which was
Pliny’s of the ‘four horns,’ and which is the <i>Hexacornis</i> of Shaw.
Varieties exist and add to the perplexity; probably also hybrids occur
among these as among non-viperine snakes.</p>

<p>A curious variety of the nasal appendages appears in the <i>Langaha</i> with
the <i>crête de coq</i>; only the crest is on the snout instead of on the
head.</p>

<p>These spurs are merely modifications of the epidermis like the rest;
but are, no doubt, endowed with peculiar sensitiveness, so that
possibly they act as a sort of herald in the dark, like a cat’s
whiskers.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-325a.jpg" width="200" height="75"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Profile of <i>Langaha</i>.</p>
</div></div>

<p>There are the pointed-nosed Dryophidians also, with scaly
protuberances, and others with variously-elongated snouts terminating
in long, scaly, horn-like appendages, all, no doubt, more or less
sensitive, to enable the owners to feel their way, or ascertain the
nature of their surroundings, especially if they are of nocturnal
habits.</p>

<p>In some of the tree snakes, notably <i>Passerita</i>, there is no appendage,
but the long snout is itself endowed with mobility. This is a nocturnal
snake; a harmless and exceedingly slender, graceful creature.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-325b.jpg" width="200" height="68"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Profile of <i>Passerita</i>.</p>
</div></div>

<p>But of these curious developments or prolongations, one of the Indian
fresh-water snakes presents a remarkable<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_326" id="Page_326">[326]</a></span> example, almost allying
it to some of the fishes with long tentacular appendages. <i>Herpeton
tentaculum</i> is its name, its pair of tentacles being scaly and
flexible, and in appearance somewhat like the African viper’s horns,
sticking out horizontally from its snout. They are employed under water
as organs of touch, and probably to discern food.</p>

<p>These are some of the most striking head-appendages; though in the way
of pug-nosed ophidians and curious profiles we might give a whole page
of illustrations.</p>

<p>In the acrobatic chapter, mention was made of a pair of rudimentary
hind limbs in some of the boas. Externally the derm is condensed into
‘claws’ or ‘hooks.’ In form they are merely long, simple appendages,
which in the largest boas are about as big as a finger. Claws and hooks
they are in the matter of use, being a pair, and they no doubt assist
the climbing snakes in grasping.</p>

<p>As a condensed form of the tegument, they are included in this chapter;
but as they are truly vestiges of limbs, I will digress a moment to add
a word.</p>

<p>Says Darwin on rudimentary and atrophied limbs: ‘The disuse of parts
leads to their reduced size: and the result is inherited.’ Some tame
little lizards in my possession&mdash;our native species&mdash;when crawling
about their cages scratching the sand or pushing their way among the
moss and rubbish, frequently made use of their fore legs only, allowing
the hind legs to drag after them, not because the latter were in any
way injured, but simply because the lizards could do well enough
without them. They were folded back or permitted to lie passively
prone against the tail, while the arms and exquisite little hands were
sufficient for the work required.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_327" id="Page_327">[327]</a></span> They reminded one of Darwin’s words,
and though my style of talking to my pets was such as to suit lizard
comprehension solely, I did sometimes warn them in plain English. ‘If
you don’t give your legs sufficient exercise, they will dwindle away by
and by, and your descendants will have no hind legs at all!’</p>

<p>After thus moralizing to the unheeding lacertines, it was with secret
gratification that one heard Professor Huxley, in his Lecture on
‘Snakes’ at the London Institution, Dec. 1, 1879, say&mdash;as nearly as I
can remember&mdash;‘In evolution or a gradual change, the lizard found it
profitable to lose its legs and become a snake; all modifications are
an improvement to the creature, putting it in a better condition.’ In
this ‘better condition,’ therefore, does the slow-worm find itself,
when it glides noiselessly, and almost without stirring a blade of
grass, into its burrow. In other lizards one may sometimes observe
that the <i>hind</i> legs are most used in scratching and pushing the earth
away. Thus, in the constricting snakes&mdash;these descendants of some
pre-ophidian lizards&mdash;the unused limbs have become obsolete; and the
spine, gaining strength with increased action, has at length become to
the constrictors their hands, feet, arms, and legs, and endowed with
those wondrous capabilities which were described in chap. xii.</p>

<p>To return to the integument. As one of its developments, the hood of
the cobra may be included in this chapter, the skin here exhibiting
its extensile or expansive construction. It is the longer ribs, about
twenty pairs nearest the head (see p. 33), which really do form
the hood. These anterior ribs, gradually increasing in length and
decreasing again,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_328" id="Page_328">[328]</a></span> are not connected with the ventral scales in the
same way as those on which the snake progresses, but can be elevated
or expanded in the manner familiar to the reader; they then support
the extended skin exactly in the way that the ribs of a lined parasol
support the fabric; only while the ribs of the parasol spring from a
common centre, the ribs of the cobra are attached to its vertebræ,
requiring no other agency than the will of the owner. The action of
the ribs as expressive of emotion, in several species of snakes, was
mentioned page 150. In the ‘hooded’ snakes (<i>naja</i>), it is seen in an
extreme degree. Facing you, the angry cobra displays these umbra-like
expanded ribs, while the form of the ‘neck’ or vertebral column in the
centre is prominently perceptible. When at rest, they all lie flat one
over the other, like the ribs of a closed parasol.</p>

<p>In the way of external peculiarities the ‘gular fissure’ may be
mentioned. It is merely a slight groove or crease extending from
the chin longitudinally under the throat for a few inches or more,
according to the size of the snake; a sort of wrinkle (<i>fosse</i>) to
admit of expansion during the swallowing of prey.</p>

<p>Externally snakes have no indication of ears; therefore, in the way of
integument, there is nothing to describe in their organ of hearing. But
the eye covering is a beautiful and wonderful arrangement.</p>

<p>Snakes have no eyelids, and can therefore never close their eyes, a
fact which has given rise to a vulgar belief that they never sleep.
Their eyes are, however, well developed, particularly in those
snakes which live above ground, and are covered with a transparent
layer of the epidermis,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_329" id="Page_329">[329]</a></span> forming a capsule which is moulted with
the cuticle. Physiologists tell us that it is moistened with the
lachrymal fluid. Bright and glistening is the serpent’s eye, except
previous to desquamation, when, from the new skin forming beneath, it
becomes opaque and dull, and the snake is blind for a few days more or
less, according to its health at the time. Rymer Jones considers the
transparent membrane cast with the slough a real eyelid in a framework
of regular scales; Huxley (in the lecture already alluded to) said
snakes’ eyelids are as if our two eyelids were joined. In form and
appearance this moulted cuticle is singularly clear and shapely: on the
outer side, like a miniature watchglass; but within it is a perfect
cup, standing up and out from the surrounding scales like a cup in a
saucer, the rounded base of which is the transparent skin, as here seen.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-329.jpg" width="200" height="76"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Illustration of eye covering.</p>
</div></div>

<p>For the process of sloughing or casting the skin, the term
desquamation&mdash;literally, an unscaling&mdash;is often used; but this word
seems rather to imply an unhealthy action, as if the cuticle peels off
in pieces, than the normal operation, which is to shed it entire.</p>

<p>It is a matter of surprise&mdash;if we are to believe what we read&mdash;that
few naturalists seem to have witnessed this process, so as to be able
to describe it from their own observations; but this must be due more
to lack of interest than of opportunity, since the occurrence is very
frequent. Those in the vicinity of Zoological Gardens have no excuse
for not observing it; yet so lately as Oct. 1879, we find a writer in
<i>Nature</i>, vol. xx. p. 530, attempting to describe the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_330" id="Page_330">[330]</a></span> ‘skin-shedding,’
with the admission that he has never witnessed the process, nor, he
believes, ‘has any observer’! He thinks snakes shed the skin ‘as if you
turned a narrow hem, or a glove-finger by a knotted thread fastened at
the tip,’ and which of course would draw the tip <i>inside</i> the finger.
The glove tip is to represent the tail of the snake, which, as he
supposes, adhering <i>at the tip</i>, is drawn along <i>inwards</i> as the snake
proceeds to crawl out of its own mouth, or its cuticle’s mouth&mdash;which
has already become loosened round the lips. This, in the mind of that
writer, satisfactorily accounts for the skin being usually found
reversed! Can he have never seen a silkworm change its skin; or found
the slough of a common caterpillar adhering to its tail; or observed
the appearance of its mouth previous to the moulting? True, a slow-worm
sometimes leaves its slough in a crumpled-up condition, exactly like
the silk-worm’s. This I have seen. On the other hand, the same little
reptile, on another occasion, crawled out of its coat, leaving it
perfect and unreversed through its entire length. Both sloughs have
been preserved. As a more general rule the slough is reversed; but in
the process it folds back and over the body, <i>outside</i> of it, in the
manner of a stocking drawn off from knee-wards, and turning back till
entirely reversed it leaves the foot. This common and apt illustration
is easily understood if we suppose the top of the stocking to be the
mouth of the slough, and the toe its tail. But as the toes might
sometimes slip out of a stocking when nearly off, so does the tail
of a snake sometimes slip out; this portion therefore is often found
<i>unreversed</i>. More than a hundred years ago the sloughing of snakes was
understood<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_331" id="Page_331">[331]</a></span> and described in the <i>Phil. Trans.</i> for 1747, vol. xl.; as
also of lizards ‘slipping off their skins as vipers do.’ Some young
vipers changed at six weeks old, and again in two months after that.
‘They always began at the mouth,’ said the writer. The process has been
witnessed and described by many since that, though more by foreign than
by English naturalists.</p>

<p>Some of the older writers have told us that ‘a snake frequents the spot
where it has cast its skin,’ or, in other words, that it selects that
locality for its nest&mdash;a fact as curiously stated as if you related of
a person that he chose for his home the house in which he performed his
toilet. Snakes have a strong affection for locality; and where their
nest is, there, or near it, their garments are naturally renewed.</p>

<p>Another mooted question has been the precise period of sloughing;
formerly the accepted opinion was that once a year, viz. in the spring,
was the usual habit. This was probably from so many coils of skins
being found at this season. That they do change in the spring may
be established as an almost invariable rule; but not then only. No
precise periods can be given with certainty, because it depends on the
individual, its health and surroundings. The ophidian is a fastidious
creature, and when his garment becomes soiled or uncomfortable he
discards it. Thus after hibernation, when for some months numbers
of snakes have been coiled in masses in a cave or under stones
and rubbish, and they emerge into daylight, aroused by the sun’s
revivifying rays, what more natural than to cast off the old winter
garb for a more comfortable suit?</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_332" id="Page_332">[332]</a></span></p>

<p>Almost invariably, soon after a long journey, and on being established
in a new home, a snake re-attires. We have seen what their travelling
cages are! Closely nailed up, and often in air-tight boxes in which the
poor things are tumbled over and over with as little mercy as ceremony
during removal from one conveyance to another, they arrive&mdash;as in the
case of the African viper (coloured illustration)&mdash;in such a pitiable
plight that it is next to impossible to identify them. Another almost
invariable rule is sloughing soon after birth&mdash;that is, in from a
week to a fortnight; also, during early and rapid growth, the young
snake will change frequently. Most ophiologists fix upon two months
as an average time, taking one snake with another; for while one may
desquamate every few weeks, another may keep his coat unsoiled for six
months.</p>

<p>Sir Joseph Fayrer made careful notes on this subject. He had one cobra
which changed in rather less than a month&mdash;viz. first on Oct. 17th,
next on Nov. 10th, and again on Dec. 7th. A <i>Liophis</i> at the London
Gardens changed every few weeks, and a <i>Ptyas</i>&mdash;he of the lecture
exhibition (p. 214)&mdash;changed almost once a month on an average.</p>

<p>A curiously beautiful object is the cast-off coat, and well worth
an examination. You discern the exact form of the reptile’s head,
mouth, and nostrils, the exquisitely transparent eye-covering, the
various forms of the overlapping or imbricated folds or ‘scales,’ and
how admirably the broad ventral plates are adapted for locomotion;
particularly noteworthy too is the perfect reversion of this coat of
some feet or some yards in length, turned inside out as you may turn a
sleeve.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_333" id="Page_333">[333]</a></span></p>

<p>The first time I watched the process was with the celebrated Hamadryad
soon after it was installed as a distinguished inmate at the Zoological
Gardens. The interest attached to this <i>Ophiophagus</i> or snake-eater had
caused me to observe it on all possible occasions; and as the whole
front of its cage was clear glass at that time, the spectator could
easily see all that occurred within.</p>

<p>Will the reader once more accompany me in imagination to the Gardens,
and see how a snake performs its toilet? I have watched many since
then, and have observed the same proceeding in them all, those in
good health and able to assist themselves; in others it is a literal
desquamation or peeling off of scales or fragments in a dry state.
Encouraged by the very recent statement in a highly scientific journal,
that no one is supposed ever to have witnessed the sloughing of snakes,
I venture to again describe what I saw, having already done so in
the <i>Dublin University Magazine</i> in Dec. 1875, and in <i>Aunt Judy’s
Magazine</i> (Sept. 1874), and elsewhere.</p>

<p>We stand before the cage of the interesting Hamadryad (<i>Ophiophagus
elaps</i>). His name at once tells us that he is fond of trees as well
as of snakes; but, alas! there is no tree in his cage, not even an
old bough on which to exercise his climbing propensities. He is
wonderfully restless to-day, crawling ceaselessly about as if in
search of something. This, however, cannot be his object; for his head
is not raised in observation, but is close to the shingle, as if too
heavy to lift. He seems to be pushing it before him in a very strange
manner, and is evidently suffering discomfort of some sort. All round
his cage he goes, against the edge of the tank,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_334" id="Page_334">[334]</a></span> still pushing and
rubbing his head, now under his blanket, or against any projecting
surface, under again, close to the floor, restlessly on and on in these
untiring perambulations; what can be the cause? After a tedious while
‘Ophio’&mdash;as his admirers call him&mdash;varies his movements, but only to
turn the chin upwards and push his head sideways over the shingle.
Now the other side he pushes along: the action is like that of a cat
rubbing her head against your chair. Now he turns his head completely
over, so that the top of it may come in for its share of rubbing;
and such for a considerable time are his persistent movements, while
we watch him wonderingly, and at length point him out to the keeper
inquiringly.</p>

<p>‘Going to change,’ said Holland. ‘That’s the way they always do.’</p>

<p>To you and me, dear reader, the sight is novel and interesting; so let
us continue to watch, glad that nothing more serious is the matter with
this rare and valuable snake than doffing an old coat.</p>

<p>And soon we see the skin separating at the lips, where, no doubt, it
has caused irritation and induced that incessant rubbing. Now the
entire upper lip is free, and the loose portion laps back as Ophio
pursues his course. Next we see the skin of the under lip detaching
itself; and that is also reversed, the two portions above and below
the jaw increasing every moment and folding farther and farther back
with the ceaseless friction until they look like a cape or hood round
Ophio’s neck, from which his clean bright head emerges. Hitherto the
process has been tedious, but now the ribs are reached, and they take
part in the work and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_335" id="Page_335">[335]</a></span> facilitate matters greatly. The snake has no
longer to rub himself so vigorously, but simply to keep moving; and at
every step, so to speak&mdash;that is, with every pair of ribs in succession
beginning at the neck&mdash;the large ventral scale belonging to that pair
is shoved off, carrying with it the complete circle of scales. With an
almost imperceptible nudge each pair of ribs eases off a portion, which
continually lengthening as it is vacated, and reversed of course, folds
back more and more, till Ophio looks as if he were crawling out of a
silken tube. As he thus proceeds, now very rapidly, he emerges bright
and beautiful&mdash;six inches, a foot, two feet; and all the while each
pair of ribs successively performs its part with that nudging sort of
action, like elbowing off a coat sleeve. If we had begun to count from
the very first pair, and if he had not gone under his blanket during
the process, we could have told the precise number of pairs of ribs
which he has to assist his toilet. He had two yards and a half of old
coat to walk out of, but this he achieves in far less time than it
took him to get his head clear. In his native tree or jungle he would
have found leaves and underbrush to aid the operation; and it would
be a great kindness to snakes in captivity to provide them with wisps
of straw, when sloughing, or some rough rubbish in their cages. Soft
blankets and smooth wood-work do not offer sufficient resistance for
them.</p>

<p>The constricting snakes are less at a loss. From their pliancy of
motion, and their habits of coiling&mdash;from the fact of their ‘whole body
being a hand,’ as we have already seen, they can assist themselves by
their own coils passing through them, and so helping to drag off the
slough.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_336" id="Page_336">[336]</a></span></p>

<p>Those who have kept snakes tell us that the tame ones will even leave
the slough in the hand, if you hold them during the process, and permit
them to pass gently through the closed fingers. Owen, in his <i>Anatomy
of the Vertebrates</i>, mentions as a not unfrequent action, that when the
head is free from the slough the snake brings forward the tail, and
coils it transversely round the head, then pushes itself through the
coil, threading its body through this caudal ring.</p>

<p>But we have left our captive with still about a foot and a half of
garment to get rid of and this is not much less difficult to accomplish
than the head-gear. He has arrived at the last pair of ribs, and
now, without such agency to free the tail cuticle, he more than ever
needs some opposing obstacle. He has only his blanket, however, to
pass under; and at last, by dragging himself along, the process is
completed, the extreme few inches sliding off unreversed.</p>

<p>On several subsequent occasions the Hamadryad has left the entire
tail, often <i>nearly</i> all of it, unreversed, as do many other snakes.
Sometimes by a succession of jerks they manage to get rid of this
portion; sometimes a comrade happens to pass over the slough&mdash;a great
assistance, as affording resistance. I observed this particularly in
a small constrictor, one of the three that entrapped two or three
sparrows in as many coils at the same moment. In this case the whole
process occupied less than ten minutes. After rubbing its head against
the gravel, and turning it completely over to free itself from
the upper shields, its ribs took chief part as usual, and I noted
particularly that each pair moved in concert, and not alternately. This
little snake went round close under the slanting edge of his bath-pan,
which afforded<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_337" id="Page_337">[337]</a></span> him some assistance, and by the time he reappeared in
front the whole slough was discarded, excepting a few inches of tail.
These few inches caused some trouble, until his friend the python
happened to pass over it, when with one final jerk the slough was free
and entire from lip to tip. It was the quickest and most complete
sloughing I have ever watched.</p>

<p>When all was over, the large, beautiful black eyes of this four-striped
or ‘four-rayed’ snake were particularly brilliant, as the little
constrictor looked about and watched observantly, rejoicing in his
newly-found faculty, after the blindness of the preceding days. Often
the snakes are shy, and change at night; the tamer ones, however,
undress when it suits them, affording frequent opportunities for
observation.</p>

<p>The slough when first discarded is moist and flabby; but it soon dries,
and then in substance is as much like what is called ‘gold-beater’s
skin’ as anything else, though a stronger texture is observable in the
head-shields and the ventral scales.</p>

<p>The size of the scales does not appear to bear any very regular
correspondence with the size of their owner; for you will notice that
some snakes only three feet in length, have larger scales than others
three yards in length. Some of the immense pythons have smaller scales
than a rattlesnake; and again, snakes of similar dimensions have scales
different both in size and form. As great a variety is seen in the form
and arrangement of scales as of shields.</p>

<p>Snakes are to a certain extent invalids previous to the shedding of
their skin, temporarily blind, courting retirement, and declining food;
but they recover triumphantly the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_338" id="Page_338">[338]</a></span> moment the slough is discarded.
They then appear to rejoice in a new existence, their functions are in
fullest activity, their appetite keen. At this time the poisonous kinds
are most to be dreaded, probably from the venom having accumulated
during the quiescent condition.</p>

<p>At this time, too, their colours show to the greatest advantage, their
eyes are brightest, and their personal comfort no doubt is enhanced in
every way.</p>

<p>Before taking leave of the integument, a few words about the markings
or patterns and colouring of serpents may not come amiss. Mr. Ruskin,
in his celebrated lecture on Snakes, exhibited to his delighted
audience a fine anaconda skin, and drew attention to the ‘disorderly
spots, without system,’ with which this snake is marked. <i>Taches à
tortue</i>, as it was at first described; and by Dumeril as marked ‘<i>avec
de grandes taches semées sans ordre</i>.’ Notwithstanding the irregularity
the skin is handsome. The oval spots of various sizes and at unequal
distances have still a character of their own, as much as the spots of
the leopard or the stripes of the zebra, no two of which are placed
with mathematical precision. Mr. Ruskin had but few kind words to
bestow on ophidian reptiles, but the disorderly patterns of their coats
he greatly disapproved. Moreover, the great artist was inclined to
pronounce a sweeping verdict on the conspicuous ‘ugliness of the whole
<i>poisonous</i> families’ without exception.</p>

<p>Now unfortunately we have had occasion to lament the good looks of many
venomous kinds which are easily mistaken for harmless snakes. Some
of the American <i>elapidæ</i> are amongst the most beautiful, with their
black, white, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_339" id="Page_339">[339]</a></span> crimson rings. The African viper and her young one
baffle the artist’s palette in their prismatic hues, as do several
other of the horned snakes. Indeed, for rich colourings the venomous
kinds rather carry the day. The <i>form</i>, it is true, is often clumsy
and ungraceful in the vipers, but as an exception we have ‘<i>vipera
elegans</i>,’ and others of less ugly and slighter forms.</p>

<p>Since the subject was thus presented to us, I have, however, observed
the markings more closely; and it really is curious as well as
interesting to note how very nearly the various patterns approach to a
perfectly geometrical design, yet failing in the same manner that a bad
workman would fail in imitating the pattern given him to copy.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-339.jpg" width="400" height="72"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Plan of design.</p>
</div></div>

<p>To Dr. Stradling I am indebted for a very handsome boa skin from
Brazil. Spread upon the carpet it is like a piece of oilcloth, and at
the first glance I exclaimed, ‘Even Mr. Ruskin could not disapprove of
this.’ But on closer inspection one was obliged to admit ‘disorder’
throughout. The skin is about ten feet long, and the whole way down the
centre of the back runs a pattern which an accomplished artificer would
thus represent. There is evident intention of two straight lines with
points at equal distances, a very pretty centre of rich brown, picked
out with darker shades and spots of white. Throughout the entire ten
feet of skin most of the points and intermediate<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_340" id="Page_340">[340]</a></span> centres had a splash
or spot of white, and most of the points were opposite, but no two feet
consecutively could I find with better finished markings than this.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-340a.jpg" width="400" height="135"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Exact pattern with the lateral spots.</p>
</div></div>

<p>The outer spots also were evidently of triangular intentions, and
for the most part occupying the spaces midway between the points.
These, of lighter tints, also run the whole length of the snake, the
pattern of course diminishing with the size tailwards, but varying in
no other way. The question is not whether the strictly geometrical or
the less perfect design would be the handsomer, or we might give the
preference to the pattern as we find it; but looking closely at any
elaborately-marked snake, it certainly <i>is</i> curious to perceive that
in every case there is this same attempt at something too difficult to
accomplish, as when a novice in fancy-work does her stitches wrong.
The same thing is seen in the snakes of the frontispiece, and the same
is seen again even in this simple pattern, a chain running down the
back of little <i>Echis carinata</i>. The spaces are unequal, the black
cross bands imperfect, and the centre spots some round, some oval, some
almost absent.</p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-340b.jpg" width="250" height="61"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Pattern of a snake.</p>
</div></div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_341" id="Page_341">[341]</a></span></p>

<p>May we conclude that this incompleteness is a sign that the design is
not fixed by long inheritance? But if it were so, and presented to us
with geometrical precision, it is doubtful whether we could admire it
equally!</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-040.jpg" width="200" height="273"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_342" id="Page_342">[342]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-027.jpg" width="500" height="106"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XIX.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>DENTITION.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">IN the preceding pages it may have been observed that the adage, ‘There
are no rules without exceptions,’ occurs so frequently in ophidian
physiology that the latter are almost in the majority. Concerning the
teeth especially, the forms of dentition in the various families, the
distinction of species by them, the size and position of poison fangs,
etc., the rules involve so many exceptions that we can perhaps render
the subject less perplexing by dispensing with rules altogether. ‘The
gradations of teeth are very imperceptible,’ said Prof. Huxley in
his lecture at the London Institution. So numerous are their stages
of development that there is really no well-defined gap between the
venomous and the non-venomous species. ‘We do not know for certain
whether the ordinary teeth are poisonous or not,’ Huxley also said.
The recent researches into the nature of salivary secretions will
throw more light on this subject. A large non-venomous snake, like
other normally harmless animals, if biting angrily, with its abundant
salivary glands pouring secretions into its<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_343" id="Page_343">[343]</a></span> mouth, might inflict a
very ugly wound, especially on a feeble or frightened victim.</p>

<p>A few rules may, however, safely be offered as ‘without exception,’ and
these I will point out in order to clear the way a little towards a
better comprehension of the exceptional ones.</p>

<p>All true snakes, poisonous or not, that have teeth at all, have the six
jaws described in the first chapter, viz. the right and left upper jaw,
the right and left lower jaw, and the right and left palate jaw. The
latter are called ‘jaws,’ not anatomically, but merely as answering the
same purpose, being furnished with teeth; each true jaw and the palate
being considered as two or a pair, on account of the independent action
imparted to each by the especial muscles and the elastic tissue which
unites them, where in the higher animals they are consolidated.</p>

<p>With but one exception (the <i>egg-eating Oligodon</i> or <i>Anodon</i> family)
all other true serpents, whether venomous or not, possess the two rows
of palate teeth.</p>

<p>All can move or use each of the six jaws, or any two, three, or more of
them independently, as we observed in feeding, some of the six holding
the prey while others move on. Some writers have conveyed the idea
that there is a regular alternation and even rotation of the jaws in
feeding, No. 1, 2, and so on in succession till all the six have moved,
and then No. 1 in its turn again; but observation inclines me rather
to decide that there is no other rule than the feeder’s individual
convenience, according to what its teeth may be grasping, any more than
there is in other creatures that without reflection or intent, and not
strictly in turn, eat now<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_344" id="Page_344">[344]</a></span> on one side of the mouth and now on the
other (except in the case of some poor mortal with the toothache, when,
having only the two jaws, his distressful efforts are chiefly directed
towards relieving that side of its ordinary duties). Snakes, for aught
we know, may have the toothache: loose teeth they frequently have; they
suffer from gum and mouth affections too, and no doubt can at such
times relieve a whole jaw of its work.</p>

<p>In all true snakes the teeth are long, conical, and curved: not planted
perpendicularly, but directed backwards; these long, fine, claw-shaped
instruments presenting a formidable obstacle against the retreat of a
creature once seized by them. Their arrangement is a species of trap,
like the wires of a mouse-trap: to enter being easy enough, but to
escape against the spikes being impossible.</p>

<p>All snakes renew their teeth throughout life. Except fishes, therefore,
no creatures are so abundantly supplied with teeth as are the Ophidia.</p>

<p>On account of this continual loss and replacement of teeth, the number
is rarely so fixed and determinate as to be characteristic of the
species. Probably no two snakes, not even brothers and sisters of the
same brood, may possess precisely the same number of teeth at a given
age; because they are so easily loosened and lost, that the normal
number might rarely occur in all the members of the same family at the
same time. In the scientific language of Rymer Jones, ‘the facility for
developing new tooth germs is unlimited, and the phenomena of dental
decadence and replacement are manifested in every period of life.’</p>

<p>Says Nicholson, ‘The teeth are replaced not merely when<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_345" id="Page_345">[345]</a></span> accident has
broken off the old ones, but they are all shed at more or less regular
intervals, coinciding with the casting of the epidermis.’ Not on <i>each
occasion</i> of sloughing, as we may, I think, understand this, but, like
the casting of cuticle, contingently, according to the condition of the
individual. Not altogether, either, or at certain periods of life, as
a child loses his first teeth and gets a second crop, or as an adult
cuts his wisdom teeth, but ‘a crop of young teeth work their way into
the intervals of the old teeth, and gradually expel these latter.’ All
the spaces and depressions between the maxillary and palatine rows are
occupied by the matrix of tooth germs. Not a cut can be made in this
part of the palate without the knife turning up a number of young teeth
in every stage of development.<a name="FNanchor_92_92" id="FNanchor_92_92"></a><a href="#Footnote_92_92" class="fnanchor">[92]</a></p>

<p>Independently of this accidental number, the maxillary presents certain
phases which characterize families. For instance, a true viperine snake
has in the upper jaw fangs <i>only</i>: non-venomous snakes have a whole row
of from fifteen to twenty-five maxillary teeth, and in intermediate
species their normal numbers vary considerably. Some of the highly
poisonous families, notably the cobras and the sea snakes, have a few
simple teeth in addition to fangs. The length of the jaw, therefore,
diminishes in proportion to the number of teeth it bears. Only the
viperine snakes are limited to the poison fang in the upper jaw; but
fangs, like the simple teeth, are shed, broken, or lost, and renewed
continually.</p>

<p>Behind the one in use&mdash;the functional fang&mdash;others in various stages of
development are found&mdash;‘a perfect storehouse<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_346" id="Page_346">[346]</a></span> of new fangs,’ as Mr. F.
Buckland in his facetious style called them; ‘lying one behind another
like a row of pandean pipes.’ In the skeletons of viperine snakes these
may readily be observed. In the living example they are enclosed in a
capsule, hidden by the loose gum sheath, called a gingeval envelope. So
when the functional fang meets with an accident, or falls out in the
order of things, the supplementary fangs in turn supply its place, each
becoming in time firmly fixed to the jaw-bone, and ready to perform the
office of its predecessor.</p>

<p>Poison fangs succeed each other from behind, <i>forwards</i>; the simple
teeth from the inner side, <i>outwards</i>.</p>

<p>Before proceeding further, it may be well to explain that what is
meant by the <i>true</i> snakes in the foregoing rules, are those which do
not possess the lizard features; <i>Anguis fragilis</i>, and some of the
burrowing snakes which approach the lizards, not having the palate
teeth. But here again we are tripped up with exceptions, since we are
told that in dentition the boas are allied to the lizards; yet they
have palate teeth.</p>

<p>The importance of dentition in distinguishing snakes is seen in the
names assigned to them from their teeth alone. In giving a few of these
terms we enable the reader to perceive at once, not only how very
varied are the systems of dentition, but in what way they vary, the
words themselves conveying the description.</p>

<p>The names here given are without reference to venomous or non-venomous
serpents, but only as belonging to certain families whose teeth present
characteristics sufficiently marked to be named by them.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_347" id="Page_347">[347]</a></span></p>

<p>From <i>odous</i>, <i>odontos</i>, a tooth.</p>

<table id="td2" summary="td2">

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Anodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Toothless.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Boodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Ox tooth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Cynodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Dog’s tooth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Deirodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Neck tooth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Dinodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Double tooth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Glyphodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Grooved or carved tooth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Heterodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Abnormal tooth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Isodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Equal toothed.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Lycodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Wolf’s tooth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Ogmodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Furrowed or grooved tooth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Oligodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Few toothed.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Rachiodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Spine toothed.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Sepedon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Noxious tooth, or a tooth causing putridity.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Tomodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Stump tooth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Xenodon,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Strange tooth.</td>
 </tr>

</table>

<p class="p1">In Dumeril’s system very many families, including sometimes several of
the above, are grouped according to their teeth, thus:&mdash;</p>

<table id="td3" summary="td3">

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl"><i>Aglyphodontes</i>,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Teeth not carved or notched.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl"><i>Holodontes</i>,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Whole or entire teeth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl"><i>Anholodontes</i>,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Without whole or entire teeth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl"><i>Aproterodontes</i>,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Without front teeth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl"><i>Isodontiens</i>,</td>
  <td class="tdl">With even teeth.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl"><i>Apistoglyphes</i>,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Grooved at the back, or the back teeth grooved.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl"><i>Proteroglyphes</i>,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Grooved in front, or the front teeth grooved.</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl"><i>Solenoglyphes</i>,</td>
  <td class="tdl">Cut or carved with a canal.</td>
 </tr>

</table>

<p class="pbq">And some others whose names are equally descriptive.</p>

<p class="p1">These various characters, with the exception of <i>Aproterodontes</i>, which
refers to the under jaw, have reference to the upper jaw only. It might
be tedious to the reader to enter into a minute description of each of
the above groups: sufficient for our present purpose is it to show that
such varieties exist, and that a simple, even row of teeth, as a family
distinction, is oftener the exception than the rule.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_348" id="Page_348">[348]</a></span> Some of the teeth
increase in size posteriorly, others are largest anteriorly; others,
again, are larger towards the middle of the jaw, and decrease at either
end. Some harmless snakes have ‘fangs,’ that is to say, fang-like
teeth, but not connected with any poison gland, and at the back
instead of the front of the jaw. Again, there are some non-venomous
species that have the power of moving these fang-like teeth, raising
or depressing them as vipers move their fangs, and as will be further
described presently. Some grooved teeth convey an acrid saliva, others
are without any modification of saliva, the long teeth being of use in
holding thick-skinned prey.</p>

<p>Thus we find every gradation both in number and in form until we come
to the true fang, the ‘murderous tooth’ of the terrible cobra, the
<i>hydrophidæ</i>, and the <i>viperidæ</i>. And noteworthy it is that the fewer
the teeth in the maxillary bone the more terrible are they. Fig. A of
the four illustrations given opposite is the jaw-bone of the Indian
Rat snake, <i>Ptyas mucosus</i>, already ‘honourably mentioned’ in these
pages. The illustration being taken from Fayrer’s <i>Thanatophidia</i>,
may be received as a faithful representation. This conveys a good
idea of jaws generally in non-venomous snakes of that size, say from
six to ten feet long. In some of the smaller kinds the jaw and palate
teeth are so fine as to be almost imperceptible to the naked eye. To
the touch they feel like points of the finest pins. Draw your finger
along or press it against a row of ‘minikin pins,’ and you will form a
correct idea of these tiny weapons. I have often <i>felt</i> when I could
not <i>see</i> them in the mouth of a small harmless snake. Pass the tip of
your little finger<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_349" id="Page_349">[349]</a></span> gently along them towards the throat, and they are
almost imperceptible even to the touch; but in withdrawing your finger
<i>against</i> the points, you feel how excessively fine they are.</p>

<p>The accompanying illustrations are from nature, and exemplify the
various lengths of jaw in four snakes, not differing very greatly in
size.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-349.jpg" width="400" height="144"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Four jaws. From Fayrer’s <i>Thanatophidia of India</i>.</p>
</div></div>

<p><i>Fig. A.</i> <i>Ptyas mucosus</i>, with simple teeth only. That they are not
very regular is probably owing to the stages of growth in those that
have replaced others.</p>

<p><i>Fig. B.</i> A venomous snake, <i>Bungarus</i>, the ‘Krait,’ with a fixed fang
in front and a few simple teeth behind it.</p>

<p><i>Fig. C.</i> Jaw of the cobra, with a longer fixed fang, and one or two
simple teeth behind it.</p>

<p><i>Fig. D.</i> The shortest jaw of them all, that of the Indian viper
<i>Daboia</i>, in which the maxillary is reduced to a mere wedge of
bone. These, with four or five reserve fangs, are here folded back
‘depressed.’ A few palate teeth are also seen.</p>

<p>Having given a slight sketch of the various forms of dentition, and
arrived at ‘fangs,’ we may recapitulate, in what Nicholson calls
‘roughly speaking,’ four stages of development in these latter.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_350" id="Page_350">[350]</a></span></p>

<p><i>First</i>, the ‘fangs’ of the harmless snakes, such as <i>Lycodon</i>,
<i>Xenodon</i>, <i>Heterodon</i>, etc., which have no poison gland, but whose
saliva may be slightly and occasionally injurious.</p>

<p><i>Secondly</i>, those having a salivary gland secreting poison and a
grooved fang in front of some simple teeth, <i>Hydrophidæ</i>.</p>

<p><i>Thirdly</i>, the maxillary bone shorter, bearing one poison fang with a
perfect canal, and one or two teeth behind it. In some of these there
is a slight mobility.</p>

<p><i>Fourthly</i>, the maxillary bone so reduced as to be higher than long,
and bearing only a single tooth, viz. a long, curved, and very mobile
fang, <i>Viperina</i>.</p>

<p>These four classes, be it observed, are only designated ‘roughly
speaking.’ Nicholson describes a close gradation in the development of
the poison glands also to correspond with those almost imperceptible
stages. The poison gland is after all only a modified salivary gland.
It lies behind the eye, whence the venom is conveyed by a duct to the
base of the fang, down along it, and sometimes through it, and is
emitted at what we may for the present call the point, into the wound
made by it, something on the principle of an insect’s sting. As when
inserting the sting the pressure forces the poison out of a gland at
its base, so does the pressure of certain muscles act upon the poison
gland when a snake opens its mouth to strike. In some of the most
venomous, viz. the viperine families, the largely developed glands give
that peculiar breadth to the head. There is a hideous, repulsive look
about some of these, that seems to announce their deadly character,
even to those who see one for the first time. The evil expression of
the eye, with its linear pupil;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_351" id="Page_351">[351]</a></span> the peculiar curve of the mouth, with
its very wide gape downwards, and then up again, are unmistakeably
treacherous, venomous, vicious.</p>

<p>Like all other animal secretions, the poison is produced, expended,
and renewed, but not always with equal rapidity; climate, season, and
temperature, as well as the vigour of the reptile, influencing this
secretion. The hotter the weather, the more active the serpent and all
its functions. When the poison gland is full and the snake angry, you
may see the venom exuding from the point of the fang, and by a forcible
expiration the reptile can eject it. I have seen this in the little
<i>Echis carinata</i> and its congener the <i>Cerastes</i>. I am not certain
whether the <i>Cerastes</i> hisses or not, but under terror or excitement
it moves itself about in ‘mystic coils’ as Echis does, producing a
similar rustling noise with its scales; but both of them, if angry,
will strike at you with a sound which may be compared with a sneeze or
a spit, at the same time <i>gnashing</i> their mobile fangs and letting you
see that they have plenty of venom at your service. They may almost be
said to ‘spit’ at you, though literally it is the mouth ‘watering with
poison,’ combined with the natural impulse to strike, which produces
this effect. We can, however, by this judge of the force with which the
venom is expelled, which in a large viper must be considerable.</p>

<p>Travellers have told us that a serpent ‘spouts poison into your eye.’
If an angry one strike, but miss its aim, the poison is then seen to
fly from its mouth, sometimes to a distance of several feet. Whether a
snake is so good a marksman as to take certain aim with this terrible
projectile, or whether he possess sufficient intelligence to attempt
it, we<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_352" id="Page_352">[352]</a></span> may doubt. Dr. Andrew Smith tells us that this belief prevails
among the natives of South Africa.</p>

<p>A bright object always attracts snakes, and some victimized traveller’s
eyes may have been remarkably brilliant, and in consequence smarted
under the accident. Be that as it may, the poison is sometimes so
abundant that you may see it flow from the mouth over the prey. The
glands being excited, just as are the salivary glands of mammals, the
mouth ‘waters’ with poison. In the Hamadryad I have seen it flow, or
more correctly ‘dribble,’ down over the snake it was eating. This
noxious secretion assists digestion in the same way that the ordinary
saliva in the human mouth does. Says Dr. Carpenter, ‘The saliva
prepares food for the business of the stomach; and if the ordinary
operations of mastication and insalivation be neglected, the stomach
has to do the whole work of preparation as well as its own especial
duty of the digestion.’ That the digestive powers of snakes are strong,
we know from the fact that nearly all animal substances are converted
to nutriment in the stomach of a healthy snake. The abundant saliva
must be a powerful agent in the process, because mastication takes no
share in the work. This has become more than mere conjecture, since
recent experiments have shown that snake venom possesses strong peptic
qualities; that, like pancreatic juice, it will even dissolve raw meat
and albuminous substances. Recent experiments have also shown that
the salivary gland is the laboratory in which the poison of venomous
serpents is elaborated; that ordinary saliva is there intensified,
concentrated, and endowed with its toxic properties.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_353" id="Page_353">[353]</a></span></p>

<p>During the two hundred years that have witnessed the development of
natural history into a science, many and various have been the methods
of zoological and particularly of ophiological classification. A
few of these methods are sketched out in chap. ii. It will be seen
that the character of the teeth had not for a long while much weight
in classifying snakes. According to Schlegel, Klein in 1755 was
the first to separate the venomous from the non-venomous snakes in
classification. But after him Linnæus, then the greatest naturalist of
modern times, distinguished snakes chiefly by the form of the ventral
and sub-caudal plates; so that in the six genera which he established
(<i>Amphisbæna</i>, <i>Cecilia</i>, <i>Crotalus</i>, <i>Boa</i>, <i>Coluber</i>, and <i>Anguis</i>),
rattlesnakes and boas, colubers and vipers, with others of the most
opposite characters, were jumbled up together; and the little burrowing
blindworm and the venomous sea snakes were supposed to be related,
because they neither of them had ventral scales! On account of his
vast researches and great reputation, subsequent naturalists were slow
to entirely overthrow his system and to venture on reforms of their
own, and our cyclopedias are suffering to the present day from the
confusion of the various methods of classification adopted by so many
naturalists, as a few quotations presently will show. Dandin, 1802,
though his work was reckoned by Schlegel the most complete up to his
time, comprehended all the venomous snakes under the head of ‘vipers.’
Cuvier divided the vipers (with <i>crochets mobiles</i>) from those with
fixed fangs; but yet was unsound in many other respects, confounding
the <i>Elapidæ</i> with the <i>Viperidæ</i>, although he professed to separate
them. Another confusion<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_354" id="Page_354">[354]</a></span> arose out of the word <i>cobra</i>, Portuguese
for snake, so that wherever the Portuguese settled most snakes were
<i>Cobras</i>. In India the English have retained the name <i>Cobra</i> for the
snakes with the hood, which name is now confined to the one group,
<i>Capella</i>.</p>

<p>‘The characters of dentition offer in a great many cases a decisive
method for distinguishing the species,’ says Günther; ‘but as regards
the combination of species into genera and families, it is of no
greater importance than any other external character by itself....
Still I am always glad to use the dentition as one of the characters of
genera and species whenever possible&mdash;namely, whenever it corresponds
with the mode of life, the general habits, and the physiology.’<a name="FNanchor_93_93" id="FNanchor_93_93"></a><a href="#Footnote_93_93" class="fnanchor">[93]</a></p>

<p>Since the publication of Dr. Günther’s work, <i>The Reptiles of British
India</i>, 1864, the distinctions of the various types of dentition
seem to have been more clearly comprehended; and as this work is the
accepted authority among English ophiologists, and will best commend
itself to the reader, it shall be our guide in the present attempt to
simplify much complication.</p>

<p>The five groups of snakes described in chap. ii. are divided into three
sub-orders of Ophidia as follows:&mdash;1. <i>Ophidia colubriformes</i> (the
harmless snakes). 2. <i>Ophidia colubriformes venenosi</i> (those which, not
having the viperine aspect just now described, are the more dangerous
from their innocent appearance). 3. <i>Ophidia viperiformes</i> (the
viperine snakes).</p>

<p>Although apparently named from their form only, it is the teeth which
have chiefly to do with these latter distinctions,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_355" id="Page_355">[355]</a></span> as will be seen on
reference to the dotted examples of upper jaws. The first have the six
rows of simple teeth (four above, as seen, and the lower jaw teeth),
in all from 80 to 100 perhaps. The second have the two rows of palate
teeth, the lower jaw teeth, and a <i>fixed</i> fang on each upper jaw, with
one, two, or more simple teeth in addition. The Australian poisonous
serpents are nearly all of this group, the only viperish-looking one,
the ‘Death adder,’ having fixed fangs like the cobras. The sea snakes
and the <i>Elapidæ</i> are included. The third have only four rows of simple
teeth, viz. those of the lower jaws and those of the palate, with a
solitary moveable fang in each upper jaw.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-355.jpg" width="400" height="228"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">From Fayrer’s <i>Thanatophidia</i>. The four larger dots
represent fangs.</p>
</div></div>

<p>Fayrer divides the poisonous snakes of India, again, into four
families, viz. <i>Elapidæ</i> and <i>Hydrophidæ</i>, with fixed fangs; and
<i>Viperidæ</i> and <i>Crotalidæ</i>, with mobile fangs.</p>

<p>But without so many perplexing distinctions, I hope to be able to
interest the reader in that wonderful piece of mechanism, the poison
fang, and by the aid of the authorities to represent it in simple
language.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_356" id="Page_356">[356]</a></span></p>

<p>We have long been accustomed to read that a serpent’s fang is a
‘perforated tooth’ or a ‘hollow tube,’ as if a miniature tusk had a
hole bored through its entire length, the poison entering at the root
and flowing out again at the point. This is not strictly the case.
Fangs in their construction are not absolutely ‘hollow,’ with ivory on
the outside and pulp on the inside, but are as if you had flattened
out an ivory tusk and folded or wrapped it over again, so as to form a
pointed tube. It would then have dentine both on the outer and inner
surface. This involution may be compared with that seen in a long
narrow leaf, in which the larva of an insect has enwrapped itself. The
various degrees of involution are extremely close, as also would be
the forms of leaves and the extent of curling which each caterpillar
had effected. Some fangs are folded so as to leave the&mdash;<i>join</i>, we
will call it, easily perceptible. Others leave a groove more or
less evident; while in others the fold is so complete as to have
disappeared entirely. Schlegel, in describing the insensible passage
from solid teeth to fangs, affirms that traces of the groove are always
perceptible: ‘<i>On découvre toujours les traces de la fente qui réunit
les deux orifices pour le venin.</i>’<a name="FNanchor_94_94" id="FNanchor_94_94"></a><a href="#Footnote_94_94" class="fnanchor">[94]</a></p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-356.jpg" width="250" height="464"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Two fangs magnified, showing<br />the slit more or less
complete.<br /><i>c</i>, a section. From Fayrer’s<br /><i>Thanatophidia</i>.</p>
</div></div>

<p>In a mixed collection of thirty odd fangs of various snakes<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_357" id="Page_357">[357]</a></span> lent to
me by Holland, the keeper, for examination, and sent all together in a
little box, there were few in which I could not discern the join. The
keeper was not sure to which snakes each belonged, excepting one or two
of the largest, which were those of a puff adder. Those of the larger
<i>Crotalidæ</i> I could identify by the peculiar curve. In a functional
fang of the ‘bushmaster’ (<i>Lachesis mutus</i>), which I myself took from
its jaw, there is a well-defined line, like a crack, the whole way
down, from the base to the slit; in a rattlesnake fang, also in my
possession, there is a faint appearance of this line or join; and in a
young Crotalus fang it is still there,&mdash;only a faint crack, such as you
would contemplate with alarm in your egg-shell china, still there it is.</p>

<p>It is scarcely necessary to explain that fangs differ in size in
different families, as well as proportionately to the size of the
possessor. In sea snakes they are not much larger than the simple teeth
behind them. In the Cobra they are larger than in the Bungarus; in the
viper they attain their largest size.</p>

<p>But in one respect all fangs agree, and that is in their delicacy and
fineness. Under the microscope, the stronger the lens the greater the
degree of exquisite polish and sharpness revealed. To handle those
of very young vipers is as difficult as it would be to handle fine
needle-points of similar length. One can compare them with nothing
else, except perhaps the fine thorns of the sweet briar, which are
equally unmanageable, and, as compared with manufactured articles,
equally exquisite.</p>

<p>Sir Samuel Baker describes the fangs (both functional and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_358" id="Page_358">[358]</a></span>
supplementary) of a puff adder which he found. His words, if not
strictly scientific, are so graphic as to convey a true idea of these
terrible weapons. The viper was five feet four inches long, and fifteen
inches in girth in its largest part. The head was two and a half inches
broad. Sir Samuel counted ‘eight teeth’ (fangs), and secured five of
them, the two most prominent being nearly one inch long. ‘The poison
fangs are artfully contrived, by some diabolical freak of nature, as
pointed tubes, through which the poison is injected into the base of
the wound inflicted. The extreme point of the fang is solid, and is so
finely sharpened that beneath a powerful microscope it is perfectly
smooth, although the point of the finest needle is rough!’<a name="FNanchor_95_95" id="FNanchor_95_95"></a><a href="#Footnote_95_95" class="fnanchor">[95]</a> He
describes the aperture in the fang as like a tiny slit cut in a quill.</p>

<p>This ‘slit’ is a very important feature in the fang, and is the cause
of much trouble in deciding whether a bitten person has been poisoned
or not. It is in reality a very small space <i>near</i> the point, where the
involution of the fang is incomplete, that is, where it has remained
unjoined. This is to permit the emission of the venom. It is not
close to the point, which, as Sir S. Baker affirms, is solid. Being
solid, it is stronger and sharper, penetrating the skin of the victim
more easily, and making way for the venom which in viperine fangs
then follows and escapes through the slit into the wound. By this we
comprehend how a person may receive a puncture only, or a scratch with
this extreme but solid point, but not deep enough for the poison to
enter. The space between the lines at <i>a</i> in the next illustration
shows where this slit in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_359" id="Page_359">[359]</a></span> the fang is found. In the larger fangs it
may be readily discerned with the naked eye: under a magnifying glass
it is distinguishable in all. It is distinct in the fangs of the young
Jararacas now before me, and extends nearly half-way up the fang in
these.</p>

<p>The examples of fangs here given are all from nature, and as near to
the exact size as it is possible to be in delineating objects of such
exceeding fineness and delicacy. Excepting the <i>Xenodon’s</i> and the baby
viper’s, the others belong to the <i>Crotalidæ</i>, whose fangs are mostly
distinguishable by a slight double curve or flange. The viperine fang
is a continuous curve (see <i>f</i>), but in the <i>Crotalus</i> the point curves
very slightly back again and downwards.</p>

<p>For the Brazilian specimens, I am indebted to Dr. Arthur Stradling, who
presented me with the snakes, out of whose jaws I myself procured them.
In this <i>Lachesis</i> there were two fangs <i>visible</i> on one side, and
only one on the other, viz. the functional pair, and one nearly ready
to replace one of these. In addition to the pair were four reserve
fangs hidden under the functional one on the right side. I say ‘under,’
because anatomically they were <i>beneath</i>, though locally <i>above</i> when
the snake was in its natural position. All these five fangs I got from
only one side, and in addition some others too small to represent.
There may be yet more in the membranous capsule, as mine was a sadly
unscientific search for them, and without any very powerful magnifier.
Like Charas, I ‘grovelled’ for them! From a young <i>Jararaca</i> I also got
out the functional and four or five supplementary fangs from one side,
also an exceedingly small and short jaw-bone, leaving the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_360" id="Page_360">[360]</a></span> other side
undisturbed. Even the principal fang (<i>d</i>) is too fine to represent
faithfully in printer’s ink; the others are to the naked eye and to the
touch almost impalpable. When we reflect on the exquisite sharpness and
finish of these minute weapons, and the fatal injury they are capable
of inflicting, we are filled with awe and amazement at the virulence of
the subtle fluid which oozes through that almost invisible aperture.
The brother of this tiny African viper (<i>f</i>), when only a few hours
old, struck a mouse, which was dead in less than one minute. The whole
forty-six of them (p. 321) were born with the ‘murderous teeth’ in
their vicious little jaws. The fang here represented was loose in its
mouth. A pair of perfect functional fangs remained.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-360.jpg" width="400" height="173"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Fangs and some simple teeth from my specimens.</p>
<p class="pi2 reduct"><i>a.</i> Functional fang and four supplementary fangs from <i>Lachesis mutus</i> (Brazil).<br />
<i>b.</i> Rattlesnake fang.<br />
<i>c.</i> Fang of young rattlesnake (Brazil).<br />
<i>d.</i> Fang of young <i>Jararaca</i> (Brazil).<br />
<i>e.</i> Pseudo ‘fang’ of <i>Xenodon</i> (Brazil).<br />
<i>f.</i> Loose fang from the mouth of <i>Vipera nasicornis</i>, aged one week.<br />
<i>g.</i> Portion of palate bone bearing four teeth, from <i>Lachesis mutus</i> (Brazil).<br />
<i>h.</i> Two lower teeth from the same.</p>
</div></div>

<p>Picture to yourselves the intensity of that invisible molecule of
venom, which could ooze through an equally invisible aperture in this
last diminutive weapon, and be fatal to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_361" id="Page_361">[361]</a></span> life in a minute of time! From
the effects observed on victims, I am inclined to place these large
African vipers amongst the most venomous of all serpents of their size.</p>

<p>It may be of interest to remark that the fang of the baby viper found
loose in its mouth does not resemble those remaining, either in form
or structure. That it cannot be a jaw tooth is evident from its size.
Jaw and palate teeth there are, but discernible only to the touch,
and under a magnifying glass. The fixed fang from the side on which
I found this loose one, is a trifle shorter, and much finer than its
fellow. In the loose one here given I can hardly discern any involution
at all, but on touching it with the inky point of a fine needle, the
stain shows it be hollow, and clearly so, at its base. In the two fixed
fangs, however, the involution is so incomplete that, minute as they
are, the point of a very fine needle can be drawn all down them without
slipping off.</p>

<p>One of them, the larger, on being touched with ink, revealed this
open groove or incomplete involution so distinctly that I tried the
other and was convinced at once. The loose one may be a first and
only half-developed fang. They are almost as transparent as glass. I
requested the keeper to look into the mouths of those subsequently
dead, but he found no other loose fangs. Of the remaining forty-five
deceased, let us hope those into whose hands they have fallen will be
able to throw some further light on the development of fangs in very
young vipers. Fayrer tells us that a young cobra is not venomous until
it has cast its first skin, which is usually within a fortnight. White
of Selborne<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_362" id="Page_362">[362]</a></span> found no trace of fangs in young vipers which he examined
with a lens; but these had not yet been born. The possible cause of
functional development in this little viper’s fangs may be found in
chap. xxiv. of this work.</p>

<p>Another erroneous impression regarding fangs has been produced by
confusing those that are ‘fixed’ and those that are ‘moveable.’ All
truly are fixed firmly into the jaw; but in the viperine snakes the
very short bone itself is moveable by a volitionary action, so that it
partially ‘rotates,’ and with it the fang. The <i>Elapidæ</i> have fixed or
‘permanently erect’ fangs, and when the mouth is closed these fit into
a depression in the lower jaw. Viperine fangs only can be erected or
depressed at pleasure. It is those which spring into place for use like
a pen-knife half opened, and which when at rest are folded back, like
the knife shut up again. This action has been most lucidly described by
Coues in connection with the <i>Crotalidæ</i>, under which head I will quote
from his paper. Schlegel himself is not very clear in his distinctions
between those serpents that have ‘moveable’ fangs and those which have
not, but Cuvier had already described them as <i>crochets mobiles</i>.
Indeed, it is since the date of Schlegel’s work that more complete
investigations have revealed closer anatomical distinctions. We
therefore find in some of our highest-class encyclopedias, if not of
recent date, mis-statements regarding fangs which unfortunately have
been quoted in many works. ‘Venomous serpents depress their fangs,’
says Schlegel’s translator, true to the text, but as if it were common
to all. Describing deglutition, Schlegel says ‘the same in all’ ‘<i>sans
en excepter les venimeux, qui lors de cet acte redressent leur crochets
et les cachent dans la gaine des gencives, pour ne point<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_363" id="Page_363">[363]</a></span> les exposer
à des injures</i>.’<a name="FNanchor_96_96" id="FNanchor_96_96"></a><a href="#Footnote_96_96" class="fnanchor">[96]</a> This, however, is the case with the <i>Viperina</i>
only. It is common, for the reasons just now assigned, to find the
cobra classed among the vipers, in some popular encyclopedias; and in
one, a valuable and generally trustworthy American edition of 1875, we
read, ‘moveable fangs like the cobra, viper, and rattlesnake.’ A cobra
has <i>not</i> moveable fangs. Another, an excellent English edition, but of
not very recent date, includes <i>all</i> venomous snakes under the head of
‘vipers;’ a third in general terms states that ‘venomous snakes have no
teeth in the upper jaws, excepting the fangs, and that the opening of
the mouth brings these into position;’ whereas it is now known that a
viper can open its mouth and yet keep its fangs depressed and sheathed.
In several other encyclopedias the description of fangs is suited to
vipers only.</p>

<p>It is not necessary to designate names, as these things will be set
right in the new editions. They are mentioned more with a view to
show that ophiology has advanced with rapid strides of late, rather
than presumptuously to criticise our standard works. Perhaps in
another twenty years my own poor efforts will be exposed as ‘old-time
misconceptions.’</p>

<p>The renewal of poison fangs is another subject of interest to
ophiologists: how the next supplementary fang becomes fixed,
<i>anchylosed</i> to the jaw-bone; and how and when the connection with
the poison duct is completed. Mr. Tombes, in a paper read before the
Royal Society in 1875, describes a ‘scaffolding’ of bone thrown out
to meet and grasp the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_364" id="Page_364">[364]</a></span> new fang, to ‘interdigitate and fix it in its
place; this soft bone rapidly developing and hardening.’ Sufficiently
marvellous is the functional fang in itself; the insertion of the
venom, a mode of subcutaneous injection invented long before the
doctors thought of it. ‘A most perfect hypodermic syringe,’ Huxley
calls it. Suddenly the hypodermic syringe is removed, say by accident,
by force, or by gradual decay, and all connection with the gland is cut
off; yet within a given period a second, a third, an unlimited number
in turn replace it: the connection is restored and the hypodermic
syringe is ready for action again. How the new one is brought into
relation with the poison duct has afforded much speculation, and
in the American scientific journals, as well as those of Europe,
papers on this subject appear from time to time. Dr. Weir Mitchell of
Philadelphia affirms that when the fang is lost by natural process
it is replaced in a few days: when by violence, several weeks elapse
before the next is firmly fixed.<a name="FNanchor_97_97" id="FNanchor_97_97"></a><a href="#Footnote_97_97" class="fnanchor">[97]</a> He speaks of the rattlesnake
chiefly. Fayrer gives the periods in several cobra experiments. In one
cobra whose fangs were carefully drawn out on Oct. 7th, new fangs were
‘anchylosed’ to the bone in twenty-four days. In another, thirty-one
days elapsed before the new ones were ready for use; and in two others,
eighteen days. In all of these cases the new fangs were capable of
inflicting deadly injury by the time stated.</p>

<p>But the perfection of mechanism culminates in the viper fangs; and
reasoning from analogy, the intensity of poison in their glands also.
When at rest, these lie supine along the jaw, but can be ‘erected,’
<i>i.e.</i> sprung down, for use by a special<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_365" id="Page_365">[365]</a></span> muscle. The two fangs above
the dotted illustration of viperine dentition (p. 355) show both
positions. Nicholson affirms that the Indian viper Daboia can inject
as much poison in half a second as a cobra can in three seconds; ‘that
whereas a cobra’s virus flows in small droplets, the viper’s runs in
a fine stream.’ Though a much smaller snake than the cobra, Daboia’s
fangs are nearly double the size, as may be observed by comparing the
figs. <i>C</i> and <i>D</i> (p. 349). There seems reason to believe also that
this viper (which in its features Fayrer considers a true Indian type)
can inflict injury with more than the pair of functional fangs. ‘In
reference to the connection of the poison fangs with the maxillary
bones,’ says this learned experimentalist, ‘I would note that second
or even third supplementary fangs may be anchylosed with the principal
one to the maxillary bone. I have before me the skull of a Daboia, for
which I am indebted to Mr. Sceva, in which this is the case; and where
there are five well-developed poison fangs on each side, of which on
one side two are anchylosed to the bone.’<a name="FNanchor_98_98" id="FNanchor_98_98"></a><a href="#Footnote_98_98" class="fnanchor">[98]</a> (Described by Mr. Tombes,
<i>Phil. Trans.</i> vol. clxvi. p. 146.)</p>

<p>This may explain what we so often read in the description of venomous
snakes found with two, three, or more fangs on each side. In my
<i>Lachesis</i> two were distinctly visible before I began to dig for those
hidden in the loose membrane, of which there seemed an abundance, and
I am nearly certain that the second one had its own particular sheath.
The spirit in which the specimen had so long been immersed, as well as
my awkward probings, forbid me to speak with certainty regarding this
second sheath.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_366" id="Page_366">[366]</a></span></p>

<p>After one of his rattlesnake bites&mdash;twenty days after&mdash;Dr. Stradling
informed me by letter: ‘My little <i>durissus</i> is shedding its skin; but
when that is over, I shall certainly examine its mouth. Now that my arm
is on the verge of ulceration, I find what I had not noticed before,
that each puncture is <i>double</i>&mdash;two large ones and a tiny second one,
about <span class="small"><sup>1</sup>/<sub>12</sub></span> inch behind each, standing out in black relief against the
scarlet skin.’</p>

<p>Neither of these experimentalists stated positively that the reserve
fangs were in connection with the duct, a phenomenon which I believe
is still unexplained. Fayrer removed the functional fangs from an
<i>Echis carinata</i>, and observed that there were no others fixed at the
time, though there were others loose in the mucous membrane. <i>On the
fifth day another pair were anchylosed and ready for use!</i> As will be
presently seen, this little viper of sixteen or eighteen inches (almost
too small to recognise near the great python in the frontispiece),
displays corresponding vigour both in the potency of its venom and in
the renewal of its weapons.</p>

<p>From the foregoing illustrations of numerous pointed teeth, the
question might arise, ‘How are they disposed of when the mouth is
closed? and from the narrow space which is apparent in the flat head
of a snake, and the close fit of the jaws, how do the four or six rows
meet without interfering with each other?’ This difficulty is obviated
by the teeth <i>not</i> closing one upon the other as ours do. Nor are the
palate teeth in the centre, or they would wound the upper part of the
trachea and the tongue sheath, which occupy considerable space. They
close down on each side<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_367" id="Page_367">[367]</a></span> of these organs. ‘Every relief on one surface
fits into a corresponding depression on the other surface, and accurate
apposition of every part is obtained,’ Nicholson explains to us. ‘The
four upper rows of teeth divide the roof into three parts, and the
lower jaw teeth fit between the upper maxillary and palatine teeth.’</p>

<p>There remains yet much more to describe in connection with the poison
fang, which might come in the present chapter; but as the two following
will treat of the <i>Viperidæ</i> and the <i>Crotalidæ</i>&mdash;the dentition being
the same in both&mdash;the viperine fangs shall claim further space under
those heads. These three consecutive chapters, and also chap. xxii.
on some exceptional forms of dentition, must necessarily be somewhat
blended; but I divide them thus in order to present the distinct
families more clearly, and render the subject less tedious to the
reader.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-367.jpg" width="200" height="70"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_368" id="Page_368">[368]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-041.jpg" width="500" height="101"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XX.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>VIPERINE FANGS.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">THOUGH the ensuing chapter will be devoted more exclusively to the
<i>Crotalidæ</i> or rattlesnakes, it were well to repeat here that the two
families <i>Viperidæ</i> and <i>Crotalidæ</i> comprise the sub-order of Ophidia
‘VIPERINA,’&mdash;those that have the isolated, moveable fangs, the term
<i>isolated</i> having reference to the functional fang only. It may appear
incongruous to present the illustration of a viperine jaw with a whole
cluster of fangs, while affirming that there is the one pair only; but
the pair in use are ‘solitary,’ because the jaw bears no simple teeth,
as in those with fixed or permanently erect fangs.</p>

<p>The first observation of the mobility of the viperine fang and its
peculiar structure is ascribed to Felix Fontana,<a name="FNanchor_99_99" id="FNanchor_99_99"></a><a href="#Footnote_99_99" class="fnanchor">[99]</a> an eminent
naturalist and Professor of Philosophy at Pisa, in the eighteenth
century. He formed the cabinet of Natural History at Florence, and died
1805, in his 75th year. But the <i>mobility</i> or action of rattlesnake
fangs was known<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_369" id="Page_369">[369]</a></span> long prior to Fontana, and he probably borrowed the
expression ‘dog-teeth’ from the old Virginia writers who thus called
the fangs. Purchas (1614), quoted in chap. xvi., describes ‘venomous
Serpentes, one ten Spannes long, with great Tuskes, which they hide and
stretch out at pleasure.’<a name="FNanchor_100_100" id="FNanchor_100_100"></a><a href="#Footnote_100_100" class="fnanchor">[100]</a> And again, in describing ‘foure kinds
of venomous Snakes. The first is greatest, Jararacucu, that is great
Jararaca, and they are ten Spannes long: they have great Tuskes hidden
in the Mouth along their Gummes, and when they bite they stretch them
like a Finger of the Hand; they have their Poyson in their Gummes,
their Teeth crooked, and a Stroake vpon them whereby the Poison
runneth. Others say they have it within the Tooth which is hollow
within. It hath so vehement a Poison that in foure-and-twentie Houres
and lesse it killeth a Man.’<a name="FNanchor_101_101" id="FNanchor_101_101"></a><a href="#Footnote_101_101" class="fnanchor">[101]</a></p>

<p>There can be no doubt but that viperine fangs are here described, those
belonging to the South American <i>Crotalidæ</i>, under their vernacular
but then their only names. Dr. Ed. Tyson, who dissected the first
rattlesnake that was handed over to science (p. 275), quite understood
the mobility of the fangs, and of the existence of supplementary teeth,
though not fully comprehending the nature of these latter; which ‘I
could not perceive were fastened to any Bone, but to Muscles or Tendons
there. These Fangs were not to be perceived upon first opening the
Mouth, they lying couched under a strong Membrane or Sheath, but so as
did make a large Riseing there on the Outside of the lesser Teeth of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_370" id="Page_370">[370]</a></span>
the Maxilla’ (meaning the reserve fangs), ‘but at Pleasure when alive
they could raise them to do Execution with, not unlike as a Lyon or a
Cat does its Claws.’<a name="FNanchor_102_102" id="FNanchor_102_102"></a><a href="#Footnote_102_102" class="fnanchor">[102]</a></p>

<p>He found seven reserve fangs on each side; and though they were not, as
he tells us, ‘fastened to any bone,’ the illustration represents them
growing in regular order according to size in the jaw.</p>

<p>In another paper read before the Royal Society in 1726, also anterior
to Fontana, on the ‘Fangs of the Rattlesnake,’ the writer, Captain
Hall, describes the dissection, which was under the direction of Sir
Hans Sloane; and ‘then the Muscles that raise the poisonous Fangs
appear.’ This anatomist also found reserve fangs. ‘Putting by this
Membrane, the fatal Fangs appear, which on first View seemed only one
on each Side, till searching further there appeared four more. The
first and largest is fixed in a Bone;’ four others were loose in the
membrane.<a name="FNanchor_103_103" id="FNanchor_103_103"></a><a href="#Footnote_103_103" class="fnanchor">[103]</a></p>

<p>Several of the old authors quoted in the chapter on Rattlesnake History
of the Seventeenth Century were quite aware of the action of the
‘Springing Teeth,’ ‘Master Teeth,’ or ‘Canine Teeth,’ as the fangs were
variously called; and Lawson, 1707, describes ‘the Teeth which poison
are two on each side of the Upper Jaws. These are bent like a Sickle,
and hang loose as if by a Joint.’ Fontana’s observations were possibly
of greater scientific importance, otherwise it is singular that his
equally thoughtful predecessors, from whom<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_371" id="Page_371">[371]</a></span> he no doubt culled much
important information, should have been overlooked.</p>

<p>In these viperine fangs there is an analogy between the vipers and the
lophius, a fish with moveable teeth; only in the fish, as Owen tells
us, the action is not volitional,&mdash;the teeth bend back to admit food,
and then by elastic muscles spring up again to retain it.</p>

<p>The true nature of the reserve fangs was surmised by Mr. John Bartram,
who in 1734 wrote from German Town, in the American colonies, to a
F.R.S., ‘On a Cluster of Small Teeth at the Root of each Fang or Great
Tooth.’<a name="FNanchor_104_104" id="FNanchor_104_104"></a><a href="#Footnote_104_104" class="fnanchor">[104]</a> He had a rattlesnake, ‘now a Rarity near our Settlements,’
and dissected it, when he ‘found in the Head what has not been observed
before by any that I can remember; <i>i.e.</i> a Cluster of Teeth on each
side of the Upper Jaw at the Root of the Great Fangs through which
the Poison is ejected. In the same Case that the two main Teeth were
sheathed in, lay four others at the Root of each Tooth in a Cluster of
the same Shape and Figure as the great ones, and I am apt to think for
the same Use and Purposes, if by an Accident the main Teeth happen to
be broken. May not these be placed to supply a Defect successively, for
the Support of this Creature?’</p>

<p>Mr. Bartram was singularly correct in his diffidently-offered surmises;
nor is it likely that in such a remote district as German Town then
was, he had ready access to foreign publications, or would have claimed
originality had he been cognisant of the work of M. Moyse Charas,
<i>New Experiments upon Vipers</i>, translated from the original<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_372" id="Page_372">[372]</a></span> French
in 1673. Charas, after describing the ‘<i>Great Teeth</i>,’ refers to the
‘smaller teeth’ (reserve fangs) ‘that are there in a Nursery, and are,
if we may say so, in expectation to serve instead of the many Teeth,
whether these come to fail of their force, or fall out of themselves.’
The author, to add weight to conclusions evidently originating from
personal investigations, tells us that he had ‘taken Pains to grovel
with a good deal of Patience in the Gums of innumerable Vipers.’</p>

<p>The Italian Redi, even prior to Charas, had also ‘grovelled’ in
the gums of Vipers, and observed the canal or slit in the fang,
‘<i>si fendono per lo lungo dalla radice alla punta</i>,’ and that these
canaliculated teeth in the moveable jaws (<i>ossi mobili</i>) were for the
conveyance of the venom.<a name="FNanchor_105_105" id="FNanchor_105_105"></a><a href="#Footnote_105_105" class="fnanchor">[105]</a></p>

<p>Thus, one hundred years prior to the work of Fontana, the structure of
the viperine jaw was understood and described by several&mdash;we may almost
say many&mdash;anatomists, to whom let due honour be rendered for their
individual and independent researches; from all of which Fontana had
doubtless benefited.</p>

<p>And so from numerous sources we might go on culling and quoting;
<i>Philosophical Transactions</i> of France, Florence, Germany, and America,
as well as of England, showing us that little by little the scientific
workers examine, compare, correspond, till out of their life’s labours
a fact is established that may be printed and learned in six lines, but
which&mdash;as is well worth remembering&mdash;often represents the brain and
eyes and time of ages of scientists.</p>

<p>Next to engage attention was the <i>structure</i> of the fang<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_373" id="Page_373">[373]</a></span> and the
‘involution’ described in the last chapter. A paper on this subject by
Thos. Smith, Esq., F.R.S., was read before the Royal Society in 1818.
Mr. Smith claims to have been the first to observe this involution as
being altogether different from the perforation of the pulp originally
supposed to be the case. He first noticed the slit in a cobra’s fang
(he being in India), and afterwards in a Hydrus (sea snake), and it
led him to further investigations. With a microscope the slit was
perceptible in a rattlesnake fang (which was also observed by the
present writer before reading this account).</p>

<p>One more paper in the <i>Philosophical Transactions</i> on this subject
must be commended to the interested student. It is the one already
quoted (p. 363), ‘On the Succession of Poison Fangs,’ by Charles
Tombes, M.A., vol. clxvi. p. 470, 1876. In this paper is presented the
result of all the most recent investigations, enriched by still deeper
researches, but of too scientific a character to be introduced in this
simple narrative of the progress of ophiology. We may, however, say
that Mr. Tombes finds the character or function of succession differs
in the vipers from that of the venomous colubrines; and this, as the
construction of their fangs and maxillary jaw differs, is what we might
look for.</p>

<p>A few more words descriptive of the external aspect of the <i>Viperidæ</i>
may summarize what has already been said of them. Schlegel suggests
that their ‘noxious character is expressed in all their parts.’
With the exception of brilliant colouring, this may be accepted as
a rule. The broad, flat, angular head, rendering the ‘neck’ thin
and conspicuous, has gained for many of them the generic, sometimes
specific name of <i>Trigonocephalus</i>. From their deadly qualities,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_374" id="Page_374">[374]</a></span>
<i>Clotho</i>, <i>Severa Atrox</i>, <i>Lachesis</i>, and <i>Atropos</i> are among their
names; while <i>caudalis</i> and <i>brachyura</i> describe the short, thin tail
as opposed to the long and tapering tails of most colubrines. The true
vipers&mdash;those that have not the nasal fosse&mdash;belong particularly to
Africa, the <i>Crotalidæ</i> proper to America, the chief distinction being
that the <i>Crotalidæ</i> have and the <i>Viperidæ</i> have <i>not</i> the ‘pit’ (see
p. 277), of which more in the next chapter. The rigid, lanceolate
scales covering the head are another viperine characteristic; also
thick, heavy bodies, tapering at each end, and rough, carinated scales.
They inhabit for the most part dry, arid deserts and sandy uncultivated
places of the Old World, Africa being their most congenial habitat. The
coloured viper and young one convey a good idea of their general aspect.</p>

<p>Ophiologists do not agree in the arrangement of genera and species,
on account of the forms running so much into each other. Gray gives
nine genera and twenty species; Wallace, three genera and twenty-two
species; and Dumeril, six genera and seventeen species. The Death
adder of Australia (p. 172) is a heterogeneous species. Its aspect
is viperine, yet it has not viperine fangs, and does not therefore
belong to this chapter. Schlegel thinks it ought not to be separated
from the true vipers, but Krefft does not state positively that it is
viviparous, so it is altogether anomalous.</p>

<p>The researches of Dr. Weir Mitchel of Philadelphia have been of great
value to ophiologists. For two whole years he gave the best portion
of his time to the study of rattlesnakes, having a number of them
under constant observation. An exhaustive paper by him was published
in the <i>Smithsonian Contributions</i>, Washington, D.C., in 1860, giving
details<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_375" id="Page_375">[375]</a></span> of experiments with the venom and the treatments adopted. But
of especial interest here are his observations on the fangs and their
volitional action, it having previously been supposed that the mere
opening of the mouth brought the fangs into position, which is not the
case. As the <i>Crotalus</i> can move each side of its mouth independently,
so it can use one or both fangs. ‘When the mouth is opened widely,
it still has perfect control over the fang, raising or depressing it
at will.’ Dr. Mitchel saw that though both fangs were present, both
were not always used. When a viperine snake yawns extensively, as it
so often does, you may sometimes perceive the fangs partially erected
or entirely so, or the ‘vibratile motion’ in them observed by Fayrer.
When the snake is angry, this vibratile action is much like that of
a cat gnashing the teeth; but when only in a yawn, the partial and
unequal erection of one or both fangs has the appearance of being
involuntary. In this I speak from observation. The effect is similar to
that seen about a person’s mouth in trying to suppress a yawn&mdash;a sort
of convulsive, nervous twitching. Whatever the cause, you perceive the
fangs moving, but <i>not</i> moving always in accord.</p>

<p>The shedding or replacement of the fangs is, Dr. Mitchel thinks, a
regular process, as in the teeth of some fishes, though not regular
as to time. Sometimes, but not always, they are shed with the casting
of the cuticle. He ‘cannot suppose that the almost mature secondaries
are awaiting an accident;’ which agrees precisely with the opinions
of Dr. Edward Nicholson and other physiologists quoted in the last
chapter: ‘A crop of young teeth’ (or of fangs) ‘work their way into the
intervals of the old teeth, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_376" id="Page_376">[376]</a></span> gradually expel these latter.’ When
lost by accident or by violence, therefore, the process of replacement
is slower, as we can readily conceive, the ‘secondary’ next in turn not
being as yet ready for duty.</p>

<p>Though the American scientific journals devoted to zoology are rich
in ophidian literature, there are few available to English students;
and I regret I am unable to ascertain from across the Atlantic the
latest researches and conclusions regarding this and several other
correlative points. To Professor Martin Duncan I am indebted for the
loan of a volume which forms one of the ‘Bulletins’ of the United
States Geological Surveys, containing a valuable ‘Report’ on the
Crotalus by Dr. Elliot Coues, of the United States army, late surgeon
and naturalist to the United States Northern Boundary Commission, 1878.</p>

<p>It is these frequent Exploring Expeditions of America that have done so
much to enrich science in all its branches; as to them are appointed
efficient geologists, botanists, naturalists, and other scientists, who
send in their ‘Reports’ to Government, to be soon reproduced in the
form of large, handsomely-illustrated volumes. Copies of these (often
consisting of ten to eighteen thick quartos) are presented to the
members of Congress, governors of States, and to many others in office,
also to literary institutions. You may have access to them in almost
every large town in America; and there is no information connected
with the history and natural productions of the nation (including
the aborigines) that cannot be found in their pages. And as our
Transatlantic cousins are always exploring some new territory, and have
still untold square miles of mountain and valley<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_377" id="Page_377">[377]</a></span> to explore, their
scientific ‘Reports’ in huge quarto tomes can be more easily imagined
than counted.</p>

<p>This little digression from the viperine fangs is by way of introducing
Dr. Elliot Coues. The volume in question was not forthcoming at the
British Museum, therefore I ventured to trouble Professor Duncan with
some inquiries, which were kindly responded to by the sight of the work
itself.</p>

<p>There is in Dr. Coues’ paper a good deal of what has been here already
described; but there is also so much that is of additional interest,
that for the benefit of those students who are not within reach of the
British Museum (where, no doubt, the fast arriving quartos will get
catalogued in due time), I will transcribe from the text some of the
passages as relating to viperine fangs generally.</p>

<p>‘The active instruments are a pair of fangs.’ ... They are ‘somewhat
conical and scythe shaped, with an extremely fine point; the
convexity looks forward, the front downward and backward’ (referring
to the slight double curve in the Crotalus fang as shown in the
illustration, p. 360). They are hollow by folding, ‘till they meet,
converting an exterior surface first into a groove, finally into a
tube.’ ... The fang is ‘moveable, and was formerly supposed to be
hinged in its socket. But it is firmly socketed, and the maxillary
itself moves, which rocks to and fro by a singular contrivance. The
maxillary is a small, stout, triangular bone, moveably articulated
above with a smaller bone, the lachrymal, which is itself hinged upon
the frontal.... This forward impulse of the palatal and pterygoid
is communicated to the maxillary, against which they abut, causing
the latter to rotate upon the lachrymal. In this rocking forward<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_378" id="Page_378">[378]</a></span> of
the maxillary, the socket of the fang, and with it the tooth itself,
rotates in such a manner that the apex of the tooth describes the arc
of a circle, and finally points downward instead of backward. This
protrusion of the fang is not an automatic motion, consequent upon the
mere opening of the mouth, as formerly supposed, but a volitional act,
as the reverse motion, viz. the folding back of the fang, also is;
so that in simply feeding the fangs are not erected.’ (But I think I
may affirm positively that sometimes the vipers do use their fangs in
feeding. When they open their mouths&mdash;or rather the jaws alternately
very wide&mdash;I have seen first one and then the other fang occasionally
engaged in the food and again disengaged unsheathed. On other occasions
the fangs have been folded. In some large African vipers, the ‘River
Jack’ and others that were in the Society’s Gardens a few years ago, I
was able to observe this easily.)</p>

<p>The fang is folded back ‘with an action comparable to the shutting of
the blade of a pocket-knife; ... one set of muscles prepares the fangs
for action, the other set stows them away when not wanted.... The
fangs are further protected by a contrivance for sheathing them, like
a sword in its scabbard. A fold of mucous membrane envelops the tooth
like a hood.... The erection causes the sheath to slip, like the finger
of a glove, and gather in folds round its base.... It can be examined
without dissection.’ (And with the naked eye in a large viper, even
during life, you may sometimes perceive this sheath or hood half off.)
‘Each developing fang is enclosed in a separate capsule,’ says Dr.
Mitchel, which is just what I thought I saw in ‘grovelling’ up the poor
Bushmaster’s reserve fangs. There was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_379" id="Page_379">[379]</a></span> an immense deal of loose skin to
remove, which under skilful manipulation would doubtless have presented
the form of sheaths of various sizes. At last I came to a great deep
cavity as big as a bean or a hazel nut, and this I left neat and
uninjured for some one else to explore. It might have been the poison
gland! The young Jararaca’s mouth is too small to reveal its mysteries.</p>

<p>But now we come to the most amazing of all the wondrous detail of
this living hypodermic syringe. Those who have seen a viper or a
rattlesnake strike its prey, are cognisant of the lightning-like
rapidity of the action. So swift is it that often a spectator is not
sure whether the snake touched the victim or not. A flicker, a flash,
and the bite has been given. Dr. Mitchel, describing the singular
inactivity of rattlesnakes in confinement, points out the striking
contrast between this repose and the perilous rapidity of their
stroke. Now let us look at the amount of business transacted in that
flash of time. Says Dr. Elliot Coues: ‘The train of action is first
reaching the object; secondly, the blow; thirdly, the penetration;
fourthly, the injection; and fifthly, the enlargement of the wound
(the latter by dragging upon it the whole weight of the body by the
contraction of certain muscles, which cause the fangs to be buried
deeper and thus enlarge the puncture); and all these five actions
accomplished in that instantaneous stroke!’ This is what Fayrer means
when explaining that ‘the real bite is when the snake seizes, retains
its hold, and thoroughly imbeds its fangs.’ ‘Sometimes the lower teeth
and the palatine become entangled (and sometimes a fang is left in the
wound).... The force of ejection may be seen when a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_380" id="Page_380">[380]</a></span> serpent striking
violently misses its aim, and the stream has been seen to spirt five
or six feet. A blow given in anger is always accompanied by the spirt
of venom, even if the fangs fail to engage.’ ... Another curious piece
of mechanism, and one not previously described that I am aware of, is
a provision for the fangs when they fail to bite. ‘A serpent always
snaps his jaws together, and thoroughly <i>closes them</i> when he strikes;
therefore, if the fangs failed to engage, they would penetrate the
lower jaw. But there is a certain movement among the loose bones of the
skull (perhaps not yet thoroughly made out), the result of which is
to spread the points of the fangs apart, so that they clear the inner
sides of the under jaw, instead of injuring them.’ Coues here describes
rattlesnakes particularly, but no doubt the same extends throughout the
viperines.... ‘In a large snake the entire gland may be an inch long
and one-fourth as wide, having the capacity of ten or fifteen drops
of fluid. There is no special reservoir for the venom other than the
central cavity of the gland. Formerly there was thought to be such a
storehouse; but when the tooth is folded back, certain muscles press
or compress the canal to prevent a wasteful flow: in other words, the
communication is shut off!’</p>

<p>In this wonderful exhibition of the ivory hypodermic syringe there
has not, I trust, been so much repetition as to render the subject
tedious. Presented in such graphic language and from such a source, it
must attract almost every intelligent reader, while the viperine fang
is absolutely acting before his eyes. On this subject, then, no more
need be said; though on the Crotalus family generally some interesting
matter still remains to be told.</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_381" id="Page_381">[381]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-059.jpg" width="500" height="110"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XXI.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE CROTALIDÆ.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">IN the several chapters in which the rattlesnake has been introduced,
the reader has seen that for about 250 years it has been an object of
interest and of study among naturalists, and that first one and then
another has made fresh examinations of its various parts, giving to the
world new items of information as the results of such observations.</p>

<p>And can there remain anything further to find out about it? we may
ask in surprise. Yes, there is. There yet remains to comprehend and
decide upon one feature which thus far has defeated conjecture and
investigation&mdash;the ‘pit’ (p. 277). Possibly among the indefatigable
observers in the land of rattlesnakes, recent labours may have been
rewarded by some new evidence of the utility of this peculiar orifice,
and already their zoological journals may have enlightened ophiologists
on its functions. At the present moment I am not aware of such
information; and time will not permit of further delay to enable me to
send a message of inquiry across the great deep.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_382" id="Page_382">[382]</a></span></p>

<p>Hitherto the pit has certainly plagued not only zoologists, but all
classifiers of the Ophidia; because serpents that have this facial
depression embrace so many widely differing genera, some of them
resembling in all other respects the true vipers, and others the
rattlesnakes, so that they have come to be distinguished as the ‘pit
vipers.’</p>

<p>One of our most able biologists, A. R. Wallace, in his <i>Geographical
Distribution of Animals</i>,<a name="FNanchor_106_106" id="FNanchor_106_106"></a><a href="#Footnote_106_106" class="fnanchor">[106]</a> informs us that ‘the <i>Crotalidæ</i>,
including the deadly rattlesnakes, abound most in the oriental regions’
(though not a single rattlesnake is found there, or in the Old World at
all). Let us seek for the reason of this apparent incongruity, and how
it is that a large number of serpents which have no rattle come to be
placed among those which have an instrument specially constructed to
produce a rattling sound.</p>

<p>Not to weary the reader by attempting to describe the various systems
of classification adopted by the many herpetologists who were the
contemporaries and immediate successors of Linnæus, we will rather
invite his imagination to picture the geographical history of our
globe during that age. Travels, explorations, the establishment of
new colonies, and the settlement of new territories marked the era;
and, as a sequence, new and hitherto unknown fauna were continually
brought home to Europe. We have seen, too, how natural history had been
growing into a science, and how travellers and zoologists stimulated
each other by their researches and writings. To recall a few of the
names with whom reptiles are associated, and to remind the reader that
one arranged them according to their scales, another<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_383" id="Page_383">[383]</a></span> their form, a
fourth their teeth, a fifth their habits, and so on, and that even
at the present day the classification of them is far from complete,
the present writer will be absolved from attempting anything beyond
generalization.</p>

<p>Studying snakes towards the end of the last century, were Laurenti,
Buffon, Bonnat, Lacepède, Klein, Seba, etc.</p>

<p>In the early part of the present century were Latreille, Shaw,
Daudin, Oppel, Merrem, Wagler, Neuwied, Cuvier, and many others till
we come to Gray, Fitzinger, and Dumeril, 1844. This last author, in
his introduction to <i>Les serpents solenoglyphes, dit Thanatophides</i>,
including the most deadly snakes, devotes several pages to the subject
of the ‘pit,’ and why it had especially occupied the attention of
those herpetologists who were endeavouring to improve the previously
imperfect systems. Wagler in 1824 assigned the name <i>Bothrops</i> (from
βὀθρος, any hole, or pit, or hollow dug) to vipers with the pit that
had only scales and no plates or shields on their head, separating
these from the rattlesnakes and from those that have shields (see
illus. p. 318). This nomenclature of Wagler’s did not commend itself to
other herpetologists, and Fitzinger, in his <i>Systema Reptilium</i>, 1843,
extending the group, retained the name for one of the five families
into which he divided all the venomous snakes. Fitzinger’s fifth
family, the <i>Bothrophides</i>, included some of the Indian pit vipers; but
as some of these latter have shields on their head, they could not be
admitted into Wagler’s group with scales only. As the present object is
to demonstrate some of the perplexities of naturalists, and to arrive
at the reason why so many snakes without the <i>crotalon</i> are called
<i>Crotalidæ</i>, we will quote Dumeril’s reasons, inviting<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_384" id="Page_384">[384]</a></span> the reader to
picture to himself the interest with which new examples were brought
home for investigation, and the obstacles presenting themselves to
herpetologists, who find one feature claiming alliance to this snake,
while another feature points an alliance to an entirely opposite one.</p>

<p>So Dumeril shows us why some of the herpetologists wished to admit
<i>every species that has the nasal fosse</i> under the generic name
<i>Bothrophidæ</i>, and others would have limited the term to a few, because
the name does not suit them all equally well. ‘<i>Beaucoup d’autres
serpents presentent aussi des enfoncements creusés sur la tête et sur
le bord des lèvres.</i>’ These depressions, called by Professor Owen
‘secreting follicles,’ may be easily distinguished on the upper lip
of some of the larger constrictors. In the Reticulated python you can
count these pits like deep dimples round the mouth. In the Diamond
snake (<i>Morelia spilotes</i>) they are remarkably deep along the lower lip.</p>

<p>Of those ‘follicles’ in the <i>Crotalidæ</i> Dumeril writes: ‘<i>Les fossettes
paraissent devoir être des organes particuliers dont l’usage ou la
fonction n’est pas connu il est vraix, mais qui semble avoir quelque
importance par leur position constante entre les orifices réels des
narines et les yeux, at leur structure anatomique assez compliquée.
À cause de la grande analogie qu’ils ont tous avec les serpents à
sonnettes, nous avons preféré appeler ceux-ci les crotaliens.</i>’<a name="FNanchor_107_107" id="FNanchor_107_107"></a><a href="#Footnote_107_107" class="fnanchor">[107]</a></p>

<p>The above words are under the head of ‘<i>Les Crotaliens</i>,’ a name
retained, he had already explained why. ‘<i>Les solenoglyphes qui ont les
narines doubles en apparence seront pour nous les Crotaliens quoique
cette dénomination puisse, à<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_385" id="Page_385">[385]</a></span> tort, porter à croire que ces espèces
font du bruit avec leur queue: elle indique seulement leur rapports
avec les crotales établis d’après la présence des fausses narines
ou fossettes dont nous venons de parler. On nomme quelquefois ces
Ophidiens Bothrops.</i>’<a name="FNanchor_108_108" id="FNanchor_108_108"></a><a href="#Footnote_108_108" class="fnanchor">[108]</a> ... ‘<i>Comme ce caractère conviendrait à tous
les Crotaliens parcequ’ils ont tous des fossettes dites lacrymales, ce
nom (Bothrops) deviant par conséquent trop général.</i>’<a name="FNanchor_109_109" id="FNanchor_109_109"></a><a href="#Footnote_109_109" class="fnanchor">[109]</a></p>

<p>In retaining <i>Bothrops</i> as a generic distinction, a large number of
non-venomous and constricting serpents must have been included, which
probably induced Wagler’s opposers to say of him that he ‘created a
system in which the venomous and non-venomous were huddled together
pell mell.’</p>

<p>Thus we see that on account of the nasal fosse the Indian crotaline
snakes could not be true vipers; they could not be exclusively
<i>Bothrophidæ</i>, for the reasons given above, and they certainly are not
rattlesnakes; but for want of a better name they are ‘<i>Crotalidæ</i>,’ as
they have (minus the rattle) more features in common with rattlesnakes
than with any others.</p>

<p>In the slough of a rattlesnake you may see the form of this pit. It is
lined with scales, and reversed in sloughing, perfectly shaped as a
tiny glove finger.</p>

<p>When Dr. J. E. Gray, F.R.S., etc., edited a short-lived little magazine
in 1831 called the <i>Zoological Miscellany</i>, the whole of the known
<i>Crotalidæ</i> consisted of ten genera and thirty species, of which
sixteen species belonged to Asia and its adjacent islands, one to South
Africa, and the rest to America. When he published his catalogue of
snakes<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_386" id="Page_386">[386]</a></span> belonging to the British Museum in 1849, he enumerated eleven
genera and thirty-seven species. Wallace, 1876, gives eleven genera and
forty species, the eastern examples of which belong to India, Siam,
Java, Borneo, Tartary, Thibet, Japan, and Formosa. Still more recently
some belonging to the Western States of America have, I believe, been
added by Cope or Coues, the latter informing us that up to the date of
his paper, 1878, eighteen species and upwards of the rattlesnake proper
had been described in the United States, nearly all in the west and
south-west. So, as those vast deserts are being explored, new species
are continually discovered.</p>

<p>Of the Indian species of <i>Crotalidæ</i>, those minus a rattle, Fayrer
says that they are chiefly in Malaya and Indo-China. Many of them,
the <i>Trimeresuri</i>, are arboreal, and like the foliage in colour. They
have the viperine aspect, but are ‘less formidable than their American
congeners,’ being of much smaller dimensions. Only one, <i>Halys</i>, has
anything approaching to a rudimentary rattle, a tail ending in a spine.
Of the <i>Trimeresuri</i>, the tree species, Fayrer affirms that few deaths
are ascribed to them. Some attain to above three feet in length. He
thinks a feeble person might die of their bite. They are of a sluggish
habit, and lie quietly hidden among the leaves of low bushes and ferns.
They will even suffer themselves to be moved without attempting to
bite, but one that was pressed to the ground with a stick struck so
hard as to break both its fangs. They feed chiefly on insects. Their
habits are crepuscular if not nocturnal, and Fayrer does not state
positively that they or any of the Indian <i>Crotalidæ</i> are viviparous.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_387" id="Page_387">[387]</a></span></p>

<p>Of the principal American <i>Crotalidæ</i> that are not true rattlesnakes,
the ‘Bushmaster’ (<i>Lachesis mutus</i>) stands first. This is undoubtedly
the largest venomous serpent known. In length it equals the Hamadryad;
and in thickness, the large African vipers. On looking closely at the
illustration of this reptile’s tail (p. 176), it will be seen that
in addition to the spine which terminates it, there are several rows
of fine, elaborated scales, which under the microscope appear almost
as curiously pointed as those on the head of <i>Vipera nasicornis</i>.
Dumeril thus describes the tail: ‘<i>Ponctuée, et précédée de dix ou
douze rangées d’écailles épineuses, un peu courbées en crochets à
la pointe.</i>’ This is the snake called <i>Crotalus muet</i>, or ‘dumb
rattlesnake,’ by Linnæus, and which is supposed to simulate the sound
of the rattle by vibrating this point against the leaves; but many
other snakes do this whether their tail is pointed or not, as we saw
in chap. xi. Any small thing, such as a twig rustling among dead
leaves, would produce the same sound. The near approach of <i>Lachesis</i>
to <i>Crotalus horridus</i> of the same habitat is, however, seen in this
rudimentary rattle, the agitation of which may similarly be attributed
to the timidity of these ‘highly nervous and irritable creatures,’ to
repeat Coues’ words; for deadly as they are, timidity strongly displays
itself. Watching the venomous snakes when their food is dropped into
their cages, their excessive caution, amounting to cowardice, is
remarkable, and this with the rattlesnakes especially. One will fix
its eyes on the rat which is running about, and shrink back terrified
if it approach too closely. Then if the quadruped is a moment quiet,
the snake appears to be considering whether it will be advisable to
attack it<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_388" id="Page_388">[388]</a></span> or not. Stealthily and slowly it approaches its head, but on
the slightest movement of the little animal, recedes in alarm, and is
some time before it makes a second venture. I have seen a rattlesnake
thus timidly advancing and recoiling three or four times before it
has the courage to give the fatal stroke. Even after the bite it
watches its victim with a steadiness in which terror is the strongest
expression; and when the rat has remained motionless for a time, and
the rattlesnake ventures near to investigate and make sure it is
dead, one faint gasp or dying struggle will cause the reptile to dart
back in excessive alarm, and wait again some minutes before venturing
near. After long and patient observations, I am still doubtful whether
stupidity or timidity predominates in viperine natures.</p>

<p>Of the other well-known and formidable American <i>Crotalidæ</i> is the
‘<i>Fer de lance</i>’ (<i>Trigonocephalus lanceolatus</i>) of the Antilles
and Central America. This has also a pointed tail. The Jararaca of
Gray (<i>Craspedocephalus Braziliensis</i>) is another, but without the
point. Of the true rattlesnakes, Dumeril gave five genera in 1844,
viz. <i>Crotalophorus</i>, <i>Crotalus</i>, <i>Caudisona</i>, <i>Urocrotalon</i>, and
<i>Urosophus</i>.</p>

<p>From the two species originally known, we see how they have gradually
multiplied as the country has been more thoroughly explored. In 1860,
Dr. Weir Mitchel affirmed that twenty species had been then described;
probably the most recent ‘Reports’ or Bulletins will tell us of yet
others. And these latter are exclusive of the non-rattle-bearing
<i>Crotalidæ</i>.</p>

<p>Dr. Mitchel’s experiments were with the northern species, chiefly
<i>Cro. durissus</i>; and as a relief from this wearisome<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_389" id="Page_389">[389]</a></span> classification,
some of his observations will be welcome. One very noteworthy result
is that the Crotalus does occasionally produce a sound independently
of the rattle. Not a prolonged hiss, or by any means so loud as the
innocent snakes, but merely ‘the expiration of air from the lungs just
before striking.’ I have never observed or heard this in our London
rattlesnakes, but it no doubt is of the same character and degree of
sound as that produced by the <i>Cerastes</i> and the little <i>Echis</i>, and
which more resembled a short, feeble, spitting sound. Still, as we are
informed by Dumeril that rattlesnakes are ‘deprived of voice,’ it is
interesting to know that, on the authority of Dr. Weir Mitchel, some
slight sound, though not a regular hiss, does sometimes accompany the
action of striking.</p>

<p>An inquiry has lately met the eye in one of our scientific journals
as to whether a rattlesnake drinks. Dr. Mitchel clears away all
doubts on that subject by impressing upon those who keep these
creatures the importance of giving them plenty of water, particularly
when changing the skin. Deprived of it, the cuticle comes off
unhealthily&mdash;<i>desquamates</i>, in fact, in bits. At the casting of the
cuticle, or previous to the process, they will not only drink, he tells
us, but lie for hours in the water. When they were disinclined to eat,
and had fasted long enough to endanger their health, he fed them by
force with milk and insects, and the way he managed was to get their
mouths open and insert a tunnel a safe distance down their throat.
While held in this position, a repast consisting of insects and milk
was pushed down the tube of the tunnel in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_390" id="Page_390">[390]</a></span> sufficient quantities. The
most surprising circumstance in connection with this style of feeding,
and also with the process adopted by Dr. Shortt of Madras in filling
his cobras ‘as full as they could hold’ with sour milk, is that these
fastidious and frightened reptiles did not disgorge the diet. Both
experimentalists, however, found it answer, reminding us of some
advice given to the keeper at the London Ophidarium in the case of the
Hamadryad, which, having no snakes to dine off one winter, elected to
fast. To force frogs or fish down its throat was suggested; but no one
could be found brave enough to undertake the task, and happily ‘Ophio’
survived till a relay of ring snakes arrived.</p>

<p>Both Mitchel and Coues corroborate what has been observed by others
regarding the increased virulence of the bite when moulting; but both
are of opinion that this is owing to an accumulation of venom, as the
snakes have not been feeding or expending their store for some days.
Even while not feeding, their venom is secreted all the same, and they
survive many months, even a whole year and more, without food. Dumeril
mentions one that lived twenty-five months without feeding.</p>

<p>A startling and almost horrifying demonstration of what physiologists
would perhaps attribute to nervous or to muscular irritability is
described by Dr. Mitchel, namely, an action that had been begun in
life, carried out in a headless snake. On p. 281 was described the
astonishment of Colonel Beverley, who observed the severed head of a
rattlesnake attempting to bite. ‘Then the head gave a sudden champ.’
Long after a snake is dead the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_391" id="Page_391">[391]</a></span> tongue will be exserted as in life;
and in other actions they, as it were, carry out their intentions
though deprived of vitality. ‘The headless trunk will strike,’ says Dr.
Mitchel, and continue to do this when touched or irritated as if it
still had its head and its fangs to strike with!</p>

<p>Mr. George Catlin in his <i>Life among the Indians</i> relates a
circumstance of this kind which may well be introduced here, as
illustrative of this amazing fact&mdash;a rattlesnake coiling and springing
after it is decapitated. His party were going down a river, and had
just landed to explore a little, when he saw a large Crotalus, and
seizing his gun fired at its head. At the same moment it leaped and
sprang towards him, apparently striking him on the breast, Mr. Catlin
being on the point of leaping back into the boat. He thought he had
fired and missed his aim, and was a dead man, nevertheless much
wondering at having missed his mark. Meantime, an Indian, seeing a spot
of blood on the front of Mr. Catlin’s linen smock, exclaimed, ‘You are
bitten!’ and without ceremony the smock and flannel shirt were torn
open, and a spot of blood on his breast was exposed to view. Promptly
the blood was washed off, and the Indian on his knees had his mouth
at the wound preparing to suck out the poison. Quickly looking up,
however, he rose to his feet, and with a smile of exultation said,
‘There’s no harm! You’ll find the snake without its head.’</p>

<p>Stepping ashore again, and pushing aside the long grass, there, sure
enough, was the headless rattlesnake, coiled up where it had fallen,
and with its headless trunk erect, ready for another spring. Mr. Catlin
had <i>not</i> missed fire,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_392" id="Page_392">[392]</a></span> but the creature so near the spring, was so
ready at the instant with its aim made, that it leapt and struck Mr.
Catlin probably on the very spot where it would have bitten him had the
sportsman missed his mark. The bleeding trunk had printed its stroke
with blood, driving the stain through the dress to the skin. ‘How
curious it is,’ Mr. Catlin remarks at the conclusion of his narrative,
‘that if you cut off the head of a rattlesnake, its body will live
for hours, and jump at you if you touch it with a stick, when if you
break his spine near the tail, with even a feeble blow, it is dead in a
minute. This we proved on several occasions.’</p>

<p>Mr. Catlin also helps to confirm what has been already stated in these
pages, viz. the certainty of the mate being within hearing of the
rattle, and responding when one of them sounds an alarm; also that
‘they can track each other and never lose company, though when met are
not always seen together, so that if we kill one over-night and leave
its dead body, the other will be found by its side in the morning.’</p>

<p>A near relative of the rattlesnake is the ‘copper-head,’
<i>Trigonocephalus contortrix</i> of the United States, known also as the
‘Red adder,’ and the ‘Dumb rattlesnake.’ It is the <i>Boa contortrix</i> of
Linnæus, who, as we explained above, and also in chap. ii., divided the
Ophidia into only three or four families, calling an immense number,
both venomous and harmless, ‘boas.’</p>

<p>This member of the <i>Crotalidæ</i> is said to be as venomous as the
rattlesnake, and is much more dreaded, because it has no rattle to give
warning of its proximity. When a bitten person survives, the effects
of its bite are said to be felt annually, as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_393" id="Page_393">[393]</a></span> in the case of the
rattlesnake, and the injured limb ‘turns the colour of the snake.’ In
regard to this latter symptom, said to show itself in the case of so
many snakes, the bitten limb assumes all manner of horrible tints in
most cases, and it does not require a great stretch of imagination to
detect colours resembling the also many-tinted aggressors. Still there
may be more in this than we at present know of.</p>

<p>In the cranberry swamps and tamarack marshes in the northern districts
of Ohio formerly were found immense numbers of a small and very
dark brown rattlesnake known as the <i>Massasauga</i>. It is seen lying
in clusters like small twigs on dry leaves, and still is found in
considerable numbers in some remote districts. The illustration of the
small rattle (p. 302) was sent me from that neighbourhood, and is, I
believe, from a true ‘Massasauga.’ This is the one (as I think I am
safe in stating) that was first (1810) described by Dr. Kirtland, a
distinguished naturalist of Ohio, and after him named <i>Crotalophorus
Kirtlandi</i>. Its range is confined to the swampy districts of Northern
Ohio and Southern Michigan. Its rattle being scarcely audible,
this little snake gets frequently trodden upon, and persons are as
frequently bitten; but Dr. Kirtland stated that he had never known any
one to die of its bite, which is scarcely worse than the sting of a
hornet. It is a link between the last-named snake, the ‘copper-head,’
and the rattlesnake, having head-shields like the former, and tail of
the latter. These small species no doubt help to add to the confusion
of evidence regarding the virulence of rattlesnake bites, one person
affirming that they are deadly, and another, that recovery is common.
The degree of venom between the smallest and the largest of the
<i>Crotalidæ</i> can no<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_394" id="Page_394">[394]</a></span> more be compared than can the constriction of
the little slow-worm round your fingers with the constriction of the
anaconda.</p>

<p>A word in conclusion about the rattlesnake’s enemies; and of these hogs
come first, next to man. Wild hogs, peccaries, and deer in their native
haunts, and doubtless an immense number of snake-eating birds, devour
young rattlesnakes. Deer strike them with their hoofs, jumping on them
with wonderful adroitness, so as to pin them down with all four feet.
Pigs in the west derive no small part of their subsistence from snakes;
and, as is now a well-known fact, the introduction of hogs has done
more than anything else&mdash;not even excepting the annual <i>battue</i>&mdash;to
diminish the number of rattlesnakes. The venom being ‘innocuous to
hogs,’ is a fact only partially stated. A thin hog, bitten on a vein,
might die as speedily as any other victim. It is because the venom
fails to penetrate the fat, or, as Dr. Coues more ably expresses it,
‘the fluid fails to enter the circulation through the layer of adipose
tissue.’ Pigs are not invariably exempt, any more than is the mongoose,
from the cobra’s bite. In both cases adroitness assists the animals to
evade the strike, and in the latter case the thick fur of the mongoose
is as great a protection to it as the fat is to the hog.</p>

<p>Dr. Coues mentions a danger not often anticipated in dealing with
rattlesnakes when you wish to examine them. This is their habit of
twining themselves around the arm, or wherever they can get hold.
‘Grasp it fearlessly at the back of the neck,’ he says; ‘but even then
a large one can constrict enough to paralyze both arms.’ A man who was
thus trammelled had to be relieved by a bystander. We are not always
prepared for constricting rattlesnakes!</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_395" id="Page_395">[395]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-075.jpg" width="500" height="112"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XXII.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE XENODONS.</i></p>

<p class="pch"><i>AND MY ‘DISCOVERY.’</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">THOUGH there are only about eight species that have a legitimate
right to this patronymic, there are&mdash;as my readers have seen in chap.
xix.&mdash;great numbers of ‘strange-toothed’ snakes that have a zoological,
or rather a dentitional right to it. The present chapter, however,
will comprise only a few of those most nearly allied to the recognised
<i>Xenodons</i>, which with <i>Heterodon</i> must occupy some pages.</p>

<p>The <i>Xenodons</i> have an especial interest, not only on account of their
remarkable dentition, but their vernacular names, which in Brazil,
where these snakes are common, have led to much and frequent confusion.
This can be remedied only after considerable lapse of time, for the
confusion has unfortunately been disseminated in print, and the
vernaculars, confused by local prejudices, still obtain. The incident
of my own first acquaintance with a <i>Xenodon</i> will in part explain the
kind of puzzle which prevails; and a little personal gossip about this
may, I trust, be tolerated.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_396" id="Page_396">[396]</a></span></p>

<p>A snake mentioned by a number of writers and travellers as the
<i>Jararaca</i> had plagued me long and terribly, from the contradictory
accounts of it. What <i>is</i> this Jararaca? And is it the same as the
<i>Iarraracca</i> or the <i>Ibiracua</i> or the <i>Iraracuassa</i> or the <i>Shiraraca</i>,
or several other nearly similar names which appear in books about
Brazil. Had one gone straight to Gray or Dumeril, the recognised and
scientific name for it could have been ascertained at once; but we do
not so readily find out which <i>are</i> the right books to pounce upon,
nor had I in those days learnt the necessity of trusting to scientific
works only for the unravelling of travellers’ tales; but I hunted in
dictionaries and encyclopedias and travels and those old authors again,
but with no better success.</p>

<p>In Wallace’s <i>Travels in the Amazon</i> we read: ‘Hanging up under
the eaves of our shed was a dried head of a snake which had been
killed a short time before. It was a <i>Jaráraca</i>, a species of
<i>Craspedocephalus</i>, and must have been of formidable size, for its
poison fangs, four in number, were nearly an inch long.... The bite of
such would be certain death.’</p>

<p>With this picture of a large Brazilian serpent, drawn by such an
authority as Wallace, one read in Ogilvy’s dictionary: ‘<i>Jararaca</i>.
A species of serpent in America, seldom exceeding eighteen inches in
length; having prominent veins on the head, and of a dusky, brownish
colour, variegated with red and black spots.’</p>

<p>Then Webster&mdash;evidently from the same source: ‘A species of serpent
in America,’&mdash;word for word the same as far as the black spots&mdash;‘very
poisonous. Native name in Surinam.’ And in a newer edition, Webster, in
addition,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_397" id="Page_397">[397]</a></span> gives its scientific name, <i>Bothrops Jararaca</i>; and that it
is ‘a native to (<i>sic</i>) Brazil.’</p>

<p>‘Oh! if a <i>Bothrops</i>, then it is one of the <i>Crotalidæ</i>,’ was
the decision arrived at. Kingsley, in his <i>At Last</i>, mentions a
‘mangrove snake, much dreaded by being so like the deadly Cascobel,
viz. <i>Trigonocephalus jararaca</i>.’ Thus with our puzzle we combine a
<i>Bothrops</i> with the ‘pit;’ a <i>Trigonocephalus</i> with the worst of the
viperine heads; and according to Wallace, a <i>Craspedocephalus</i>, which,
at a guess, must be that it has something rough about the head to
entitle it to this specific.</p>

<p>Few of the encyclopedias described it individually, or threw more light
upon it. Worcester’s dictionary states that the Jararaca is ‘a species
of venomous American serpent seldom exceeding eighteen inches;’ and
gives Wright as an authority. Spix and Martin<a name="FNanchor_110_110" id="FNanchor_110_110"></a><a href="#Footnote_110_110" class="fnanchor">[110]</a> in their list of
venomous snakes describe <i>Jararacucu</i>, called also <i>Shiraraca</i>, as a
<i>Bothrops</i>; and also a <i>Jararaca mirim</i>, a small one. Marcgravius<a name="FNanchor_111_111" id="FNanchor_111_111"></a><a href="#Footnote_111_111" class="fnanchor">[111]</a>
figures a <i>Iararaca</i>, a small snake of a bright red with black spots.</p>

<p>And now for our old friend the Pilgrim Purchas. ‘Of snakes that have
Poison, <i>Iararaca</i> is a Name that comprehendeth foure kinds. The first
is the greatest <i>J</i>. There are other smaller <i>Jararacas</i>, about half a
Yard long. They have certaine Veines in their Head like the Vipers.’</p>

<p>Have those ‘prominent veins anything to do with its name
<i>Craspedocephalus</i>’? But how about its being only eighteen inches?
This was the pursuit of snakes under<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_398" id="Page_398">[398]</a></span> difficulties, the clearing away
of which was accomplished only by slow degrees, as one book after
another offered new contradictions with still other varieties of
spelling. Without doubt this perplexing reptile was viperine, rough,
angular-headed, crotaline, and probably hideous; but as for colouring
there were many doubts about that.</p>

<p>After several years’ familiarity with the <i>name</i> of this puzzling
‘Jararaca,’ and curiosity increasing at a corresponding ratio, the
reader can imagine the effect produced by unexpectedly seeing at the
London Zoological Gardens one day in September 1880 a new label to
one of the cages in the Ophidarium thus inscribed, <span class="smcap">‘Craspedocephalus
Braziliensis. The Jarraracca.</span> Presented by Dr. Stradling.’</p>

<p>A live Jararaca at last! Now we shall know all about it.</p>

<p>But how is this? The serpent before me was not a viper, not
rough-headed, not a <i>Bothrops</i>, because it had only one pair
of nostrils. It had smooth, polished scales, large, beautiful,
round eyes, with no ‘red spots’ and not a spice of venom or of
viperishness about it. And I stood staring and wondering, and&mdash;I must
confess&mdash;<i>disappointed</i> at this meek-looking, smallish snake being a
representative of the terrible, ‘formidable’ picture that had been
conjured up. ‘I don’t believe that’s a <i>Jararaca</i>!’ were my inward
conclusions. ‘I am <i>sure</i> it isn’t! It <i>can’t</i> be. It does not agree
in any way.’ Then came the keeper to the cage, to tell me of this
new and valuable addition; but I only repeated aloud my already firm
convictions.</p>

<p>‘Here’s the gentleman who brought it from Brazil, and he ought to
know,’ returned the keeper in justifiable argument<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_399" id="Page_399">[399]</a></span> as he motioned
with his hand towards a stranger by his side. The name of Dr. Arthur
Stradling, a Corresponding Member of the Zoological Society, was
already known to me. Though personally unacquainted, he had, indeed,
through the columns of <i>Land and Water</i>, replied to some communications
of my own. This informal introduction, therefore, led easily to the
exchange of a few words about this contradictory ‘Jararaca,’ the
name by which&mdash;as he assured me&mdash;the snake was known in Brazil. He
had not, he said, examined the mouth of this snake during the voyage
home, knowing its deadly character; and had simply accepted it as the
‘Jarraracca,’ according to its Brazilian vernacular. I ventured to
point out the non-viperine aspect of the so-called ‘deadly’ reptile
before us, and suggested that if it were indeed venomous it could only
be an elaps, also that there were probably several that were known by
this name. This led to a correspondence, both by letter and through the
columns of <i>Land and Water</i> (Oct. 1880), on the subject of vernacular
names; but as these belong more especially to the ensuing chapter, I
need only say here that Dr. Stradling returned to Brazil determined
to investigate this confusion of names, and I thus gained a valuable
ally in my endeavours to identify some of the perplexing vernaculars of
Brazil with the scientific descriptions.</p>

<p>On a subsequent voyage, Dr. Stradling obtained three more of these
so-called Jararacas, and described them by letter, and subsequently in
<i>Land and Water</i>.</p>

<p>Echoing my own perplexities, he asks, ‘<i>Is</i> there such a snake as the
<i>Jarraracca</i>? When I got three more<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_400" id="Page_400">[400]</a></span> living specimens of the same this
last voyage in Pernambuco, I began to have my doubts, for I could not
reconcile them with the description at all. One died, which fact I did
not, by ill luck, discover till it was worthless; but I observed, as
I thought, a well-developed fang. A few days later a good opportunity
presented itself for picking up one of the survivors and examining its
mouth; then to my surprise I found that the supposed fang was really
a large curved tooth, situated quite out of the natural position of a
fang, but symmetric with one on the opposite side. Then I looked at
the other one, and finally let both bite me, which settled the matter.
I set it down as <i>Xenodon</i> (a harmless snake), and was gratified to
find on reaching home that Dr. Günther had pronounced my specimen
at the Gardens’ (the one brought the previous September) ‘<i>Xenodon
rhabdocephalus</i>, the long-headed snake, on its death. But I don’t find
any mention of this extraordinary isolated tooth anywhere, though I
have a vague idea that Dr. Wucherer, who has perhaps been the most
earnest student of the Brazilian Thanatophidia, spoke of it in a
communication to the Society some years ago. The real “Jarraracca”
is still veiled in mystery.’ I also was ‘gratified’ to find the
Corresponding Member of the Zoological Society so generously justifying
my doubts about the supposed <i>Jararaca</i>, both in his letter to me and
in a paper to <i>Land and Water</i>, 2d April 1881.</p>

<p>This was the first time I had ever heard of a <i>Xenodon</i>, a name which
Dr. Günther was then so good as to explain meant ‘strange tooth;’
and he drew a little diagram of the jaw with five simple teeth
curving back, and then a long,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_401" id="Page_401">[401]</a></span> fang-like back tooth. Strange indeed!
<i>Heterodon</i> I knew possessed a large, fang-like tooth, which had caused
it to be called ugly names. Now here is more heterodox dentition.</p>

<p>Dr. Wucherer’s account of the <i>Xenodon</i> was discovered in the
<i>Zoological Society Proceedings</i> for 1861. He also had been a
C.M.Z.S.<a name="FNanchor_112_112" id="FNanchor_112_112"></a><a href="#Footnote_112_112" class="fnanchor">[112]</a> in the same region, and his report of the curious
<i>Xenodon rhabdocephalus</i> is that it is very voracious, feeding chiefly
on frogs, but will swallow his friend too, should the latter have hold
of one on which he has set his heart. It flattens itself remarkably,
and thus gets through a very narrow chink. It is a fresh-water snake,
called <i>Cobra d’aqua</i> in Brazil, also <i>Surucucu</i> (from its evil
reputation). But Dr. Wucherer says not a word of those fang-like teeth.</p>

<p>Meanwhile Dr. Stradling had most kindly sent me the magnificent
specimen of ‘<i>Curucucu</i>’ (<i>Lachesis mutus</i>), in spirits; and this,
together with the investigation of certain other vernaculars, made
the <i>Xenodon</i> of only secondary interest in our correspondence until
exactly six months afterwards, when, on landing, June 1881, he wrote
that he was sending a <i>Heterodon</i> and another <i>Xenodon</i> to the Gardens.</p>

<p>‘Where are the new snakes?’ I asked the keeper, hurrying to the
Reptilium early next day.</p>

<p>‘What new snakes, ma’am? There are none fresh since you were last here.’</p>

<p>‘Ah, well, they are coming! Most <i>interesting</i> kinds. I shall wait for
them.’</p>

<p>Sure enough, ere long a boy was seen approaching from the office with a
‘box of snakes.’ He also brought the news that the Doctor was expected
‘directly.’</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_402" id="Page_402">[402]</a></span></p>

<p>Consigned to their cage, how I hovered about those ‘strange-toothed’
Colubers that long midsummer day! How I wished they would bring their
heads close to the glass and yawn the widest of yawns, and how I waited
for the ophiological dentist to come and exhibit their ‘fangs!’ for the
donor of these valuable acquisitions had been devoting himself to the
discovery of antitoxics, and was supposed to be snake-proof, and to do
what he pleased with both venomous and non-venomous kinds. But the long
midsummer day waxed on, and I gazed at the <i>Xenodon</i> till I knew every
mark of his leaf-like pattern; and the day began to wane, and my hopes
of seeing the wonderful teeth began to wane also. And I felt I had a
sort of claim upon this <i>Xenodon</i>, the ‘Jarraracca’ about which we had
corresponded.</p>

<p>I had relied so much on having the pseudo-fangs scientifically
displayed to me, that when the visitors were departing and the keeper
was at liberty, I told him about these strange teeth which I was so
anxious to see, and at last persuaded him to open <i>Xenodon’s</i> mouth for
me, and to hold it open (which operation the keepers understand very
well) while I made the dental examination myself.</p>

<p>After all there was nothing in the shape of a fang to be seen!</p>

<p>‘Posterior tooth long, compressed’! ‘Last tooth very long, compressed,
ensiform’! and so on, said the authorities; but nothing of the kind
was here! I could see to its very throat, and the rows of tiny palate
teeth and the four rows of jaw teeth, all exceedingly small, but never
a fang. So I stared and wondered, and then in my bewildered amazement<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_403" id="Page_403">[403]</a></span>
and vexation I passed my little finger along the jaws and <i>felt</i> the
upper teeth.</p>

<p>This practical investigation no doubt greatly offended the imprisoned
patient, for suddenly down came a pair of regular fangs&mdash;they <i>looked</i>
like fangs;&mdash;and as my finger pressed the jaw on one or on the other
side, I saw these fang-like teeth move, vibrate, exactly like the
viperine fangs. When my finger was removed, up they went, folded back
in their sheath in true viperine fashion. My finger got a slight prick,
for they were exceedingly sharp; but knowing there was no venom in
them, that did not concern me, and in a few minutes the sensation was
gone. But how was it that Dr. Stradling had made no mention of this
extraordinary viperine mobility of the fangs? And what kind of jaw
must a snake have to move its back teeth in this manner! For we saw in
the previous chapters that the mobility of the fangs is in proportion
to the diminishing length of the maxillary bone, that the excessive
mobility of the viperine fang is owing to the greatly reduced size
of that bone, that a slight mobility is observable where the jaw is
somewhat less reduced, and so on; but here is a harmless Coluber with
a jaw long enough to hold five or six fixed, simple teeth, and then an
extremely mobile long one at the back. Can the jaw be divided in the
middle? Thus I marvelled.</p>

<p>‘Now let us look at Heterodon.’</p>

<p>But that pretty little snake positively refused to open its mouth; so,
fearing to alarm it, or cause it to disgorge its last meal, I did not
encourage its forcible detention.</p>

<p>Not to lose a moment, I then and there pencilled a note to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_404" id="Page_404">[404]</a></span> Dr.
Stradling, begging him to tell me if he had observed anything unusual
in <i>Xenodon’s</i> ‘fangs.’ That I had examined them and seen what appeared
very extraordinary; but before describing it, was desirous of having my
observations confirmed by him.</p>

<p>But the Dr. had been unexpectedly appointed to another ship, which
would sail immediately. Many weeks must, therefore, elapse before his
reply could reach me.</p>

<p>That day there was but one direction to which my ophidian compass
directed my steps, viz. the British Museum; and several days were spent
there hunting every possible book to find any mention of <i>Xenodon’s</i>
moveable teeth, but in vain. Surely a feature so exceptional would have
been described had it been observed. Pardon, kind reader, these many
words about ‘so small an affair;’ but you who are naturalists know
the peculiar charm of finding ‘something new,’ producing, as Charles
Kingsley described, ‘emotions not unmixed with awe,’ that among the
happy memories of study or of travel ‘stand out as beacon points.’ It
was my great ambition to add ‘something new’ to science. But here was
I with a secret ‘discovery,’ and not knowing what to do with it. And
‘if anything should happen’ to <i>Xenodon</i> meanwhile! Then the keeper
would be reprimanded. Plainly, courtesy demanded that the secretary
of the London Zoological Society should receive an explanation of my
infringement of rules; therefore, in a letter to him, I described
<i>Xenodon’s</i> whole history. I also wrote a detailed account of <i>Xenodon</i>
to a friend who edited a zoological publication, under the delusion
that I should be invited to contribute a full, true, and particular
account of these wonderful teeth<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_405" id="Page_405">[405]</a></span> to half the zoological journals of
Europe! ‘First observed by C. C. H.!’ But no!</p>

<p>Weeks of wondering suspense passed by. Then everybody went ‘out
of town.’ On meeting Dr. Günther one day at the British Museum, I
told him what I had seen. ‘The teeth or the jaw moves?’ he asked
catechetically. That I could not explain, as it was precisely what one
wished to ascertain. ‘You must dissect that snake,’ he said, adding
that he had had no time to examine it yet. All this was duly reported
to my Brazilian correspondent, who with a generous impulse promised
to send me ‘the very first <i>Xenodon</i>’ he got. Alas! as I told him,
it was useless to give it to <i>me</i>, who could neither kill nor cut
up snakes. He did not inform me whether he, also, had observed any
mobility in the ‘fangs;’ so I could not yet flatter myself that I had
‘added to science’ in any way. Professor Halford, when in England,
had dissected the head of the dead specimen at the Zoological Gardens
(the supposed <i>Jarraracca</i>) for poison glands, but of course found
none; and I trusted to some scientific friend ‘happening by’ who would
further examine its maxillary bone and report to me; but ophiological
anatomists do not present themselves every day. Dr. Stradling was
absent; so unless other enthusiasts proceed to an examination before
this page meets the public eye, there will still remain these
‘strange-toothed’ maxillaries inviting dissection.</p>

<p>Dr. Stradling, however, after a while informed me that he had <i>not</i>
observed the mobility of the fangs, nor had he seen any mention of such
anywhere excepting in my paper to <i>Land and Water</i> (July 9, 1881).
He thought those pseudo-fangs ‘of considerable importance in bearing
on the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_406" id="Page_406">[406]</a></span> experiments that were then being carried on in Brazil with
permanganate of potash, and particularly should a non-ophiologist be
the experimenter.’ A snake is brought as a ‘Jararaca,’ a name applied
by the authorities to one of the very deadly viperine snakes. This
snake&mdash;the so-called ‘Jararaca’&mdash;bears an evil character. It has
also very suspicious-looking ‘fangs.’ It bites an animal which is
put under treatment, and though requiring no treatment whatever, a
supposed ‘antidote’ might get all the credit of a ‘cure.’ He did not
for a moment infer that such had been the case in Brazil with those
scientific experimentalists, but only what might be in consequence
of the confusion in names. And the correspondence on this subject
that appeared in the papers during the latter part of October 1881
certainly did betray some confusion between the various <i>Jararacas</i> and
<i>Jararacucus</i> that had inflicted bites.</p>

<p>Dr. Stradling had also looked in the mouth of the dead specimen of
<i>Xenodon rhabdocephalus</i>, and he informed me that one of the ‘fangs’
came out in his hand. ‘It did not break off,’ he wrote; ‘and its
articulation with the bone, if any, must be loose and ligamentous.’ I
must not presume to offer any opinion about its ‘articulation,’ except
that its being ‘loose’ might be only in consequence of a new tooth
pushing it out, or that it was about to fall out of itself. My readers
will unite in thanking Dr. Stradling for considerately forwarding me
this ‘fang,’ which so conveniently detached itself in time to be added
to the rest of the illustrations, fig. <i>e</i>, presented on p. 360. It
will be observed that it is a stouter and less symmetrical tooth than
the true fangs; but it was very large in proportion<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_407" id="Page_407">[407]</a></span> to the simple
teeth in the same jaw and on the palate, and which are not bigger than
the palate teeth seen behind the recumbent fangs of <i>Daboia</i>, p. 349.</p>

<p>Of these true <i>Xenodons</i> there are eight species; but the
strange-toothed group includes <i>Tomodon</i>, <i>Heterodon</i>, <i>Simotes</i>,
<i>Liophis</i>, and several others that have large posterior teeth, some of
which are grooved, others not, but all without a poison gland.</p>

<p>Searching page after page about <i>Xenodon</i>, something one day suddenly
caught my eye that had hitherto escaped notice. In his <i>Odontography</i>,
Owen, describing the South African snakes <i>Bucephali</i>, says: ‘Their
long grooved fangs are firmly fixed to the maxillary bone, <i>or are
slightly moveable</i> according to their period of growth; they are
concealed by a sheath of thick, soft gum, containing loose, recumbent,
grooved teeth ready to succeed those in place.’</p>

<p>‘So, then, a mobile tooth was already known to science.’ Of <i>Bucephali
viridis</i>, Dr. Andrew Smith describes the ‘posterior or <i>mobile</i> and
grooved teeth of the maxilla.’ He says: ‘Some are placed for immediate
use, the rest are recumbent between those and the inner portion of the
spongy sheath which envelops them; anterior teeth fixed.’ He considered
these back teeth not poisonous, but only for holding or preventing the
escape of food. ‘They may convey an acrid saliva.’ Still we are not
informed <i>how</i> the teeth move.<a name="FNanchor_113_113" id="FNanchor_113_113"></a><a href="#Footnote_113_113" class="fnanchor">[113]</a></p>

<p>These snakes&mdash;the Bucephali&mdash;like the far-famed horse of Alexander
the Great, owe their name to their large, ox-shaped head. They are
the ‘Boomslange’ or tree snake of the Dutch settlers, and are by some
ophiologists<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_408" id="Page_408">[408]</a></span> included among the <i>Dendrophidæ</i>, or true tree snakes,
as they live in trees; but Dr. Andrew Smith considers that their teeth
sufficiently separate them from these.</p>

<p>That there is something exceedingly interesting to study out in the
<i>Xenodon</i> family cannot be doubted. ‘The transition begun in the
Bucephali,’ says Owen,<a name="FNanchor_114_114" id="FNanchor_114_114"></a><a href="#Footnote_114_114" class="fnanchor">[114]</a> ‘is completed in the poisonous serpents,’
but where the virulent character of the saliva begins it is hard to say.</p>

<p>Despairing of any distinct comprehension of a jaw-bone which permits of
moveable back teeth, the last resource was to hunt up a skeleton. At
the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons none was to be found; but
through the kindness of the officials at the British Museum, one was at
length unearthed from the subterranean labyrinths of untold treasures
there. It was the skull of <i>X. gigas</i>, the largest of the family, and
a splendid specimen for examination. There were two large posterior
fangs on each side. On one side were two or three more large reserve
fangs&mdash;a cluster of them. All were recumbent. They were all much larger
than that of <i>X. rhabdocephalus</i>, those in reserve varying in size
relatively to their development and position. In this specimen there
were also two double rows of palate teeth, and an abundant but most
disorderly row of simple teeth in the lower jaw, with some reserve ones
packed closely on the inner side below the row in use. They exactly
illustrated the words of Nicholson and others, ‘the crop of young teeth
everywhere working their way into the intervals of the old ones.’</p>

<p>In the skulls of <i>Liophis meremii</i> and <i>Liophis cobella</i>,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_409" id="Page_409">[409]</a></span> of which Dr.
Wucherer says, ‘Dentition similar to Xenodon,’ the former had teeth
gradually increasing a trifle posteriorly, but nothing like fangs. <i>L.
cobella</i> had a very long jaw of fifteen or sixteen teeth, but no fangs.</p>

<p>On a second occasion I made a dental examination of the living
<i>Xenodon</i> in order to be fully convinced of the nature of its back
teeth, and in both instances the fangs were depressed until the snake
was provoked into displaying them. It exhibited no spitefulness or
attempt to bite, and in both cases folded back its fangs the moment my
finger was removed, as if glad that the ceremony was over.</p>

<p><i>Heterodon d’Orbignyi</i>, being a small and delicate snake, was not again
enticed to exhibit its jaws; but my forbearance was otherwise rewarded.
One day it was dining off a rather large frog, and its mouth, close
to the glass, was stretched open to its fullest extent. The frog had
disappeared so far as to be within the mouth, wedging it wide open; and
I then saw a fang well erected and in use, <i>moving</i>, being detached,
in fact, from the food. It appeared to be somewhat nearer to the front
than <i>Xenodon’s</i> fangs, with perhaps only three or four simple teeth
before it. But that it was a sheathed fang and <i>mobile</i> I have no doubt
whatever, having seen it very distinctly. I told Tyrrell at the time
that <i>Heterodon’s</i> fangs were also moveable; but now for the first
time I impart this new secret to the public. <i>Xenodon</i> also greedily
seizes upon inconveniently large frogs, but it has never displayed its
fangs to me while feeding, as the pretty little <i>Heterodon</i> did. One
more singular thing did this little <i>Heterodon</i>, and that was to assist
itself by coiling its body round an unmanageable<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_410" id="Page_410">[410]</a></span> frog one day. It
did not regularly constrict it in order to kill it; but <i>when caught</i>
in the mouth, it helped itself to restrain the straggling limbs by a
few coils. Dr. Wucherer affirms that he had never seen its congeners
<i>Liophis</i> or <i>Xenodon</i> squeeze or coil themselves round their prey, but
<i>Heterodon d’Orbignyi</i> certainly does.</p>

<p>Another peculiarity of the American <i>Heterodons</i> is that of flattening
their heads and the upper part of the body when angry or molested. It
is this, together with their pseudo-fangs, that have procured them the
name of ‘spread-head,’ ‘spreading-adder’, ‘puffing-adder’ or ‘blowing
viper’,&mdash;because at the same time they hiss violently,&mdash;or simply ‘the
adder,’ and ‘<i>blausser</i>,’ or the blower.</p>

<p>There are several species of them, all, with the exception of <i>H.
d’Orbignyi</i>, having undeniably ugly, viperish-looking heads, ‘<i>Anguis
capitæ viperino</i>,’ or ‘<i>Serpent à la tête de vipère</i>.’ The snout
terminates in a large, conspicuous, recurved scale which gives them a
pug-nosed or rather a hog-nosed appearance. Catesby, who was the first
to describe the ‘hog-nosed snake,’ said ‘it hath a visage terrible and
ugly.’ In <i>H. niger</i> and <i>H. platirhinos</i> this is most apparent. They
belong mostly to the New World, both north and south. One in Virginia
is called, from its bright markings, the ‘calico snake,’ the word
calico in America being applied chiefly to coloured prints used for
dresses. Another is called ‘the mountain moccasin,’ the latter name in
the United States being applied to venomous kinds.</p>

<p>In the flattening of the head and body, <i>Xenodon</i> and <i>Heterodon</i>
approach the cobras; in the strange dentition they approach the vipers;
in their true nature they are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_411" id="Page_411">[411]</a></span> harmless colubers: thus do we see the
wonderful links or gradations between opposite families, which have
been such a perplexity to the early naturalist.</p>

<p>The <i>Heterodons</i> have the reputation of ‘feigning death’ when annoyed.
This peculiarity has been commented on by many who have experimented
upon the snake for this purpose. Holbrooke observed it in <i>H.
platirhinos</i>, and came to the conclusion that it was done at will.
‘It will deceive its tormentor by feigning death, remaining flat and
motionless.’ It otherwise ‘flattens the head and upper part of the
neck, which it lifts and waves, hissing loudly.’ This is the true cobra
manner. He often worried it and tried to make it bite, when it only
projected its head in that menacing way, but with closed mouth. On
the contrary, other experimentalists describe it with widely expanded
jaws when thus annoyed. In an excellent American magazine, <i>Science
News</i>, the <i>Heterodons</i> formed the subject of several papers a few
years ago. To my friend, Mr. J. E. Harting, I am indebted for some
numbers of <i>Science News</i>, in which <i>Heterodons’</i> performances are
fully described. One, on being intercepted in its retreat, ‘threw its
head back with widely expanded jaws; but instead of striking, it turned
completely over on its back, remaining stiff and motionless, with jaws
fixed in rigid expansion, feigning death.’ Reptilian intellect was,
however, insufficient to carry out the feint, inasmuch as its full
muscular power was exercised to maintain its position. ‘On concealing
myself,’ continues the narrator, ‘it cautiously righted itself and made
off; but only to repeat the <i>ruse</i> when again caught.’<a name="FNanchor_115_115" id="FNanchor_115_115"></a><a href="#Footnote_115_115" class="fnanchor">[115]</a> Dr. J.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_412" id="Page_412">[412]</a></span>
Schneck, in the March number for the same year, describes a similar
action on his worrying them with a switch, when, after making futile
efforts to attack, they would seem to bite themselves (which they
really never do), and then turn on their backs as if dead. After a
few moments of quiet they would turn over and beat a hasty retreat.
Several other writers in <i>Science News</i> confirm Holbrooke’s experience,
that ‘under no provocation can it be induced to bite.’ Those we have
seen at the Gardens verify this; exhibiting an extremely inoffensive
nature, though no death-feigning or summersault performances. And I
am more inclined to attribute the rigidity to a sort of paralyzed
terror than to any pretence of being dead. The same thing is observed
in some insects. If you blow on them or alarm them, they will flatten
themselves against whatever they may be crawling on, and cling close
and stiff as if dead, but presently escape. Some other snakes, also,
as well as the <i>Heterodons</i>, keep rigidly still as if paralyzed when
molested, previous to attempting any escape, though I do not remember
any others that turn over on their backs in so singular a fashion.</p>

<p>A few more words about the <i>Deirodon</i> with its still stranger teeth
must come in the next chapter.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-412.jpg" width="200" height="43"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_413" id="Page_413">[413]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-001.jpg" width="500" height="109"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XXIII.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>OPHIDIAN NOMENCLATURE AND VERNACULARS.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">IN a lecture on ‘Chameleons’ at the Zoological Gardens, Professor
St. George Mivart described in his peculiarly lucid, facile manner,
some of the features possessed in common by totally different
zoological families, and facetiously added, ‘It is tiresome how a
single species will come and interfere with our nice definitions in
classification.’<a name="FNanchor_116_116" id="FNanchor_116_116"></a><a href="#Footnote_116_116" class="fnanchor">[116]</a> I will devote a chapter to the confusion arising
from some such mixed features.</p>

<p>In the classification of the Ophidia these tiresome complications
present themselves more, perhaps, than in any other creatures. We
have seen how snakes of entirely opposite families may possess one
single feature in common and differ in other generic respects; as, for
instance, in the moveable but innocuous fang of the <i>Xenodons</i>; in
those<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_414" id="Page_414">[414]</a></span> ‘pits’ or depressions in the face; the viperine form of head;
the position and number of head-shields; the sub-caudal plates, and so
on; and in such resemblances I am strongly inclined to suspect that
there are other interfering causes than a common ancestry, though this,
no doubt, has much to do with it.</p>

<p>‘What is to prevent our having one fixed name, and keeping to it?’
exclaim the sorely-puzzled amateur naturalists. And well they may, on
seeing in some works on ophiology a list of synonyms sometimes filling
several pages.</p>

<p>By way of illustration let us take the little spine-toothed snake
described among the egg-eaters in chap. iii. This snake was known
to be <i>edentulus</i> by Linnæus, who nevertheless gave it the generic
name of <i>Coluber</i>, because it has two rows of sub-caudal plates; and
the specific <i>scaber</i>, because it has roughly-carinated scales&mdash;both
names equally applicable to a score of other snakes, and not at
all describing its unique dentition. This latter was first made a
distinguishing feature by Jourdan, 1833, who assigned it the generic
name of <i>Rachiodon</i>, spine-toothed. Lacepède called it simply <i>La
rude</i>; Wagler, <i>Dasypeltis</i>, thick or rough-scaled, the integument
rather than the dentition still receiving prior attention by the
majority of observers.</p>

<p>Dr. Andrew Smith in 1829 more closely watched its habits, and
considered that its peculiar dentition was sufficient to separate it
from the <i>Oligodon</i> (few-toothed) family, under the new generic name
of <i>Anodon</i>, with the specific <i>typus</i> to mark it as a distinct type.
Afterwards he found that the word <i>Anodon</i> had been already adopted
by naturalists<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_415" id="Page_415">[415]</a></span> for a shell-fish, and he contented himself therefore
with Wagler’s name <i>Dasypeltis</i>, adding <i>inornatus</i> for its specific,
otherwise <i>D. scaber</i>. It is a small, slender snake, rarely exceeding
2-1/2 feet in length, and of an inconspicuous brownish colour. That it
is an extremely slender little snake is evident from the portion of
spine copied from the skeleton in the museum of R. C. S., and given in
the chapter on egg-eating snakes. Jourdan’s name <i>Rachiodon</i>, though
the best that had hitherto been assigned to the spine-toothed tree
snake, was yet rather vague, as the teeth might be anywhere along the
spinal column; and Professor Owen still further improved upon this
name by calling it <i>Deirodon</i>, neck-toothed; for though, as already
stated, a snake has no true ‘neck,’ the word <i>Deirodon</i> designates the
position of those gular teeth; and for convenience, everybody speaks
of a snake’s ‘neck’ in allusion to the part immediately behind the
head. So the little egg-eating tree snake is equally well entitled
to the generic names of <i>Oligodon</i>, few teeth; <i>Rachiodon</i>, spine
teeth; <i>Anodon</i>, toothless (as far as true teeth are concerned); and
<i>Deirodon</i>, neck-toothed. In habits it differs entirely from the
<i>Oligodontidæ</i> family, which are ground snakes. The Deirodons are
frequently found concealed under the loose bark of dead trees; and Dr.
A. Smith observed three species all having a like organization, which
induced him to conclude that all feed alike on birds’ eggs.</p>

<p>As very few snakes have such an exceptionally distinguishing
organization as the <i>Deirodon</i>, few are so happy as to escape with
only half a score of titles. Many species that have been longer known
have had their names similarly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_416" id="Page_416">[416]</a></span> improved upon by fifty naturalists,
and are still undergoing renomination as new observers discover closer
alliances with one or another family. This is particularly the case in
America, where a nomenclature entirely differing from our own is often
adopted. It will probably be the same in Australia as the science of
ophiology advances and as native naturalists increase. Says Krefft,
in allusion to these commingling features and many synonyms: ‘It is
difficult for even the scholar to master the vexatious question of
snake classification.’ Add to the scientific names an equal number
of vernacular ones, and we encounter a list sufficient to dismay the
merely lukewarm student at the very outset.</p>

<p>Let me here suggest the utility of first getting at the <i>meaning</i>
of scientific terms as an immense assistance towards fixing them in
the memory. In the construction of generic and specific names some
peculiarity is, or should be, described. This I have endeavoured to
keep before the reader throughout this volume; and by first looking
at the <i>meaning</i> of the word, it is at once simplified, while that
peculiar feature for which it is named is also grasped. Occasionally a
name baffles us, it is true, and one fails to see cause or reason in
it; but this is an exception. Other names without apparent reason are
from persons, as, for instance, when a Mr. Smith thinks to immortalize
himself by calling a snake <i>Coluber smithii</i>. Probably the next
observer would find this too general to be of much use, and discover
some peculiarity more worthy of a specific.</p>

<p>Not long ago, when Lacerda was experimenting with our distinguished
ophidian, the ‘Curucucu’ (<i>Bothrops</i> or <i>Lachesis rhombeata</i>), it
was variously introduced to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_417" id="Page_417">[417]</a></span> public through the daily press,
as the <i>Bothraps rhambeata</i>, the <i>Hachesis rhambeata</i>, and the
<i>Lachesis rhambeata</i>. It is doubtful whether many of the ‘general
public’ imagined these three names to represent the same snake, or
whether&mdash;except possibly from the last generic one&mdash;they could form
any idea of the reptile therefrom. Of the many papers that fell under
one’s notice, <i>Land and Water</i> alone on this occasion spelt the words
correctly. As yet there is no journal devoted to the Reptilia, and the
study is evidently not attractive. Nor do we expect all naturalists to
be ophiologists; but those of the editors who were zoologists might
have hazarded a guess and made sense of the generic <i>Lachesis</i>, seeing
that a deadly, fateful serpent was intended. Some of the scientific
‘weeklies’ having started the wrong names, unscientific ‘dailies’
deferentially transcribed them. The errors were chiefly traceable
to caligraphy, and are mentioned here to exemplify the advantage
of seeking a meaning in scientific appellations, the meanings of
some names being so obvious that in spite of a wrong letter you may
frequently decide upon them.</p>

<p>This fateful <i>Lachesis</i> of South America has been as perplexingly
described by unscientific travellers as the <i>Jararaca</i>, and as hard to
identify. It has been a stumbling-block and a snare ever since the time
of Waterton, who thus wrote of it:<a name="FNanchor_117_117" id="FNanchor_117_117"></a><a href="#Footnote_117_117" class="fnanchor">[117]</a>&mdash;‘Unrivalled in the display of
every lovely colour of the rainbow, and unmatched in the effects of his
deadly poison, the <i>counacouchi</i> glides undaunted on, sole monarch of
these forests. He sometimes grows to the length of fourteen feet. He is
commonly known by the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_418" id="Page_418">[418]</a></span> name of <i>Bushmaster</i>. Man and beast fly before
him,’ etc. Waterton ‘wandered’ between the years 1812-1824, making
several journeys to South America, primarily with the view to ascertain
the composition and effects of the Wourali poison, and on this subject
his information was of value. But his descriptions of serpents partook
of the prejudices of that date, and were more picturesque than
zoological. What he saw and wrote of possessed the charm of novelty in
those days, and Sir Joseph Banks addressed a letter to him expressing
‘abundant thanks for the very instructive lesson you have favoured us
with, which far excels in real utility anything I have yet seen.’</p>

<p>Endorsed by such an authority, what wonder that fourteen feet of
radiantly splendid ‘Bushmaster’ should figure in the encyclopedias
of the day, and be copied by book-makers and magazine contributors
for years and years&mdash;even to the recent date of 1874! Hartwig,
1873,<a name="FNanchor_118_118" id="FNanchor_118_118"></a><a href="#Footnote_118_118" class="fnanchor">[118]</a> gives Waterton’s ‘rainbow hues’ nearly word for word, with
the addition of one of the scientific names, <i>Lachesis rhombeata</i>.
Kingston, 1874,<a name="FNanchor_119_119" id="FNanchor_119_119"></a><a href="#Footnote_119_119" class="fnanchor">[119]</a> aided by his imagination, improves on Waterton.
The <i>Curucucu</i>, or <i>Couanacouchi</i>, ‘sometimes fourteen feet, is the
largest known poisonous snake. It is remarkable for the glowing
radiance of its fearful beauty, displaying all the prismatic colours.
It mounts trees with the greatest ease,’ etc. (It lies half concealed
<i>under</i> the trees among dead leaves.) Another writer of <i>Travels round
the World</i> (meaning the British Museum Reading-room) contents himself
with simply a ‘rainbow-coloured<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_419" id="Page_419">[419]</a></span>’ Bushmaster; so now in imagination
we add indigo, blue, green, etc., to the ‘fearful beauty.’ Meanwhile
other writers on Brazil introduce it as the Surucuru, Sorococo,
Couroucoucou, Souroucoucou, Surukuku, and similar names, varied only
by a transposition of letters and the addition of accents. Tschudi
mentions it under its scientific name, <i>Lachesis rhombeata</i>, the
‘Flammon’ in Peru.<a name="FNanchor_120_120" id="FNanchor_120_120"></a><a href="#Footnote_120_120" class="fnanchor">[120]</a> Sulivan,<a name="FNanchor_121_121" id="FNanchor_121_121"></a><a href="#Footnote_121_121" class="fnanchor">[121]</a> who, like Waterton, rambled in
South America, tells us ‘the Couni Couchi or Bushmaster is the most
dreaded of all the South America serpents; and, as his name implies, he
roams absolute master of the forest. They do not fly from man, but will
even pursue and attack him. They are fat, clumsy-looking animals, about
four’ (not fourteen) ‘feet long, and nearly as thick as a man’s arm.
They strike with immense force.’ A man had been bitten in the thigh and
died, and ‘the wound was as if two four-inch nails had been driven into
the flesh. So long are the fangs, and so deep the wounds, that there
is no hope of being cured.’ P. H. Gosse quotes Sulivan regarding the
enormous fangs, both of these latter writers judiciously omitting the
‘rainbow’ colouring.</p>

<p>Most snakes, even the dingiest, occasionally display an iridescence
which is certainly beautiful; and Waterton may have seen his
Counicouchi when the sun lighted up the recently-renewed epidermis and
showed him off in unusual brilliance; only, unfortunately, the copyists
have imagined the greens and crimsons and blues of the rainbow, and
rendered it a tedious business to poor patient plodders<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_420" id="Page_420">[420]</a></span> to arrive at
the truth. In the <i>Encyclopædia Metropolitana</i>, 1845, we find another
clue to identification. ‘<i>Trigonocephalus mutus</i>, a native of the
Brazils and Guiana, and from six to seven feet long, is known to the
Brazilians as <i>Surukuku</i>, and is probably the <i>Boschmeester</i> of the
Dutch and the <i>Cœnicoussi</i> of the native inhabitants.’</p>

<p>Many writers of travels give the vernacular names only, while the
more scientific who do give generic and specific names, may each give
a different one and perhaps omit the vernaculars; and in none of the
authorities does one discover the name ‘Bushmaster’ at all; while as to
colour and the true size we can be sure of nothing.</p>

<p>Presenting these complications to Dr. Stradling, whose kindly proffered
co-operation I had gladly accepted, he wrote: ‘The vulgar names are
often <i>local</i> in a limited area, so that the same snake may be known
by half-a-dozen different synonyms in as many different provinces&mdash;not
only that, but these names are often applied to other snakes; and
thus, while some species are blended together, many imaginary ones are
created.’</p>

<p>This in part explains the varieties of spelling seen above; the two
names <i>couanacouchi</i> and <i>curucoocu</i> being applied to one snake by
different tribes of the native races extending over a rather wide area.</p>

<p>Further confirmation of these indiscriminate terms we find in three
other writers, viz.:&mdash;First, Dr. Dalton:<a name="FNanchor_122_122" id="FNanchor_122_122"></a><a href="#Footnote_122_122" class="fnanchor">[122]</a> ‘The boa constrictor
is known as “Bushmaster” by the colonists. “Camoudi” is a name
indiscriminately applied to all large snakes. There is the land
Camoudi, and the water Camoudi,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_421" id="Page_421">[421]</a></span> while the Kunikusi or Courracouchi
of the Indians is <i>Crotalus mutus</i>, which is termed “Bushmaster” in
the forests.’ Secondly, H. W. Bates<a name="FNanchor_123_123" id="FNanchor_123_123"></a><a href="#Footnote_123_123" class="fnanchor">[123]</a> says: ‘The natives called
<i>Trigonocephalus atrox</i> the Jararaca.’ Thirdly, Dr. Otho Wucherer<a name="FNanchor_124_124" id="FNanchor_124_124"></a><a href="#Footnote_124_124" class="fnanchor">[124]</a>
affirms that a ‘venomous tree snake (<i>Craspedocephalus bilineatus</i>)
is called <i>Surucucu patyoba</i>, from the palm on which it is found, and
another tree snake is <i>Suru. Uricana</i>, from another palm in which it
resides; while <i>the</i> Surucucu (<i>Lachesis mutus</i>) lives in holes in
the ground. It is about ten feet long.’ This latter is called <i>Suru.
bico di jacca</i>, from the resemblance of its strongly-keeled scales to
the prominences on the ‘jack fruit;’ <i>Xenodon rhabdocephalus</i> is also
<i>surucucu</i>, while the true ‘Jararaca’ is <i>Craspedocephalus atrox</i>.</p>

<p>Here are contradictory <i>Curucucus</i> and <i>Jararacas</i> in plenty, all
impressing upon us the importance of comparing evidence if we wish to
arrive at a truth.</p>

<p>‘Why spend so much time about a mere name?’ Well, as in the solution
of a problem, you desire to ‘get it right.’ Besides, you ask, ‘Why so
many names to one snake?’ and in sifting out this <i>Curucucu</i> and the
<i>Jararaca</i>, we discover reasons for the many synonyms.</p>

<p>A. R. Wallace once more presents a clue:<a name="FNanchor_125_125" id="FNanchor_125_125"></a><a href="#Footnote_125_125" class="fnanchor">[125]</a> ‘At Säo Gabriel I saw
on the rocks asleep one of the most deadly serpents in South America,
the “Surucurú” (<i>Lachesis mutus</i>). It is very handsomely marked with
rich amber brown, and armed with terrific poison fangs, two on each
side.’ Here we are enabled to associate a scientific and a vernacular<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_422" id="Page_422">[422]</a></span>
name with a ‘handsome,’ though not a ‘rainbow-coloured’ serpent. Sir
J. Fayrer describes the <i>Ophiophagus</i> as the largest known venomous
serpent ‘<i>except</i> the Bushmaster, which is said to attain fourteen
feet.’</p>

<p>By this time, in addition to the ever-varying vernaculars, we learn of
Waterton’s ‘Bushmaster’ as <i>Lachesis mutus</i>; <i>L. rhombeatus</i>; <i>Crotalus
mutus</i>; <i>Trigonocephalus mutus</i>.</p>

<p>It will be observed that the word <i>Trigonocephalus</i> is used as a
generic name by some naturalists, and as a specific by others; and it
may with reason be applied to most of the American thanatophidia which
are not <i>elapidæ</i>. It therefore, at least, enables us to ascertain
that the snake of doubtful identity has this viperine characteristic
of the angular head; and as there is only one very small true viper at
present known in the New World, we may further decide that not being
an <i>Elaps</i>, our puzzler is a <i>Bothrops</i> with the <i>doubles narines</i>,
and therefore equally meriting either of the descriptives <i>atropos</i>,
<i>atrox</i>, <i>furia</i>, <i>megæra</i>, <i>clotho</i>, <i>cophias</i>, and other such fearful
appellatives freely used to designate the deadly qualities of the worst
class of serpents. In reply to a communication of mine to <i>Land and
Water</i>, of 2d October 1880, Dr. Stradling<a name="FNanchor_126_126" id="FNanchor_126_126"></a><a href="#Footnote_126_126" class="fnanchor">[126]</a> entered more fully into
this question of vernaculars, and what he says of Brazil we find to be
the case everywhere:&mdash;</p>

<p class="pbq p1">‘Whatever meaning the colloquial titles have is generally grounded on
some popular error.’</p>

<p class="p1">This we saw in the case of <i>Xenodon</i> and <i>Heterodon</i>, both called all
sorts of bad names on account of their supposed fangs.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_423" id="Page_423">[423]</a></span></p>

<p class="pbq p1">‘In Brazil, <i>Jeboia</i> and <i>Cascavel</i> are the universal names for the
boa and rattlesnake; every snake with red in its markings is a coral
snake (“corral,” from the Spanish word for a ring), every one found
in or near the water would be a <i>Cobra de agua</i>, and every other is a
Jarraracca or a Curucucu.</p>

<p class="pbq">‘I believe every country has a pet bugbear among serpents.
“Fer-de-lance” is the cry in St. Lucia when a snake rustles away in
the bush or inflicts a bite unseen, “Bushmaster” in Demerara, “Toboba”
in Nicaragua, “Vaia” in Mexico, “Vivera de la cruz” in the River
Plate. Over and over again have I had snakes of widely different
species sent to me, each guaranteed to be a genuine Jarraracca, until
I began to doubt whether the Jarraracca had any existence at all. I
believe that the one I sent to the Zoological Gardens the other day
is the real thing&mdash;<i>Craspedocephalus Brasiliensis</i>&mdash;at last’ (the
<i>Xenodon</i> after all!) ‘and I think I have sifted the Curucucu down by
elimination till I can fix the term on <i>Trigonocephalus atrox</i>.</p>

<table id="tb1" summary="tb1">

 <tr>
  <td class="tdc">·</td>
  <td class="tdc">·</td>
  <td class="tdc">·</td>
  <td class="tdc">·</td>
  <td class="tdc">·</td>
  <td class="tdc">·</td>
  <td class="tdc">·</td>
  <td class="tdc">·</td>
  <td class="tdc">·</td>
  <td class="tdc">·</td>
 </tr>

</table>

<p class="pbq">‘I fear we shall never get a decent classification till some competent
observer studies them on their native soil; the excellence of the
books on Indian reptiles is doubtless due to this. We want a man in
authority to settle the very vernacular for us&mdash;one who can say, “This
and no other shall be the Jarraracca, this the Bushmaster,” etc., for
it is undoubtedly a great advantage to have a well-defined native or
local synonym. The marvel is that the present classification should be
so good as it is. Look at the difficulties. When people see a snake
they rush at it, smash it with sticks or stones, pick up what is left
of it and put it in a bottle of cauha, cachasse, rum, or other coarse
spirit, label it with a wrong name, and send it home. And these are
the materials an ophiologist has to build on.’<a name="FNanchor_127_127" id="FNanchor_127_127"></a><a href="#Footnote_127_127" class="fnanchor">[127]</a></p>

<p class="p1">Krefft, speaking of the confusion of vernaculars in Australia, also
says: ‘To make a work on ophiology useful to all, <i>co-operation is
necessary</i>; and as a good, sound English name is prefixed to every
species, it is to be hoped that such name will, if possible, be
retained.’ He is referring more particularly to the ‘Diamond snake,’
which on the mainland is the harmless <i>Python molurus</i>, and in Tasmania
the venomous <i>Hoplocephalus superbus</i>, with very broad scales.
Therefore he ‘hopes that Tasmanian friends will accept the designation
“Broad-scaled snake” in lieu of “Diamond” for their poisonous species.’
In the accounts sent to England, the indiscriminate use of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_424" id="Page_424">[424]</a></span> such
prefixes as the <i>black</i> snake, the <i>brown</i> snake, causes infinite
perplexity, and not unfrequently furnishes argumentative articles
to the journals. ‘Carpet’ snake is another vernacular applied to a
harmless species in Australia, and to the extremely venomous little
<i>Echis</i> of India. Then every country has its ‘Deaf adder’ which is
neither an ‘adder’ nor ‘deaf.’ And the ‘moccasin’ of the United States
is a still existing stumbling-block.</p>

<p>Another great confusion in classification has been in consequence of
some of the earlier naturalists representing young snakes, or those of
varying colours, as distinct species. It is very common for a young
snake to differ in colour from the parent, and also common for those
of the same brood to differ from each other. Of <i>Coluber canis</i> Dr. A.
Smith says scarcely any two are marked and coloured alike. In a brood
of the broad-scaled Tasmanian snake, <i>H. superbus</i>, there were upwards
of thirty young ones, some of which Krefft describes as banded, and of
a light colour, the rest being black. Our English slow-worm varies from
dead black to nearly white, or flesh colour, one of the latter being an
inmate of the Gardens at the time of writing, March 1882. The English
viper also varies in colour, and we have heard of a perfectly yellow
ring snake.</p>

<p>In England we have so few snakes, viz. the ring snake, the coronella,
and one viper, and these three so distinct, that we are not likely to
be perplexed with many varieties; but in tropical or semi-tropical
regions, where closely-allied species abound, it may be suspected that
<i>hybrids</i> not unfrequently create confusion as well as a multiplication
of supposed ‘species’ not likely to cease. In our small<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_425" id="Page_425">[425]</a></span> London
collection, hybrids have been produced at least twice within a few
years; and we fear that the habit of hibernating in mixed multitudes
leads to some immorality among the Ophidia. It is like the overcrowded
dwellings of the poor, and the ‘free-lovers’ of America; and perhaps to
ophidian unions between congeners occasionally may be traced not a few
of the varieties which so curiously and closely blend different species
and are a plague to classifiers. This is mere speculation.</p>

<p>The Indian vernaculars are as abundant and perplexing as those of
Brazil. Of the cobras, Sir J. Fayrer says there are many varieties
which the natives consider different species. ‘The snake charmers
are poor naturalists, and disseminate many false notions as well
as dangerous ones about the cobras.’ In the <i>Thanatophidia</i> nine
or ten varieties are figured, all of the one single species (<i>Naja
tripudians</i>), though all bear different vernaculars. The two chief
distinctions in the markings are the spots on the back of the ‘neck,’
which, when the hood is distended, are easily distinguished. One with
a single ocellus is the <i>Keautiah</i>, known as ‘Kala samp,’ ‘Nag samp,’
etc., being chiefly of the field or jungle. The other with the double
ocellus is the ‘spectacled cobra,’ and essentially of the town. This is
the ‘Gokurrah’ of the natives, and the favourite of the snake charmers.
Being common all over a country which boasts of thirty-six written
languages, the reader can imagine the number of vernaculars bestowed
upon the <i>Cobra capella</i>.</p>

<p>The <i>ophiophagus</i> is almost equally favoured, as this snake also varies
in colour, particularly in the young ones, which Fayrer affirms might
easily be mistaken for a different<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_426" id="Page_426">[426]</a></span> species. Probably wherever snakes
abound, the vernaculars are correspondingly numerous.</p>

<p>‘And after all which <i>is</i> the Curucucu, and which <i>is</i> the Jararaca?’
Being the proud possessor of both, I may describe them from nature;
but conflicting opinions as to their identity still exist, because
there are features in common among congeneric species, and what one
author may decide is the <i>Curucucu</i> another will call the <i>Jararaca</i>.
Dumeril, Gray, Günther, and other modern ophiologists have, however, so
far simplified difficulties, as to recognise only one of each in our
zoological collections, notwithstanding the liberal use of both terms
in Brazil.</p>

<p><i>Our</i> <i>Curucucu</i>, then, <i>Lachesis</i> or <i>Crotalus mutus</i>, has the flat,
viperine head, covered with fine scales. The only plates are the
upper and lower labials, one over the eye, and a pair of rather large
ones under the chin. The ‘pit’ is very distinct, showing it to be a
<i>Bothrops</i> and one of the <i>Crotalidæ</i>. The body colour is of a pale
maize, approaching umber towards the back, and lighter on the belly,
with a chain of rich chocolate-brown, jagged, rhomboid spots, edged
with darker tints, along the back. It is undeniably handsome, and in
life no doubt was iridescent, but alas for the ‘rainbow splendours,’
they have vanished! In length it is about nine feet, and in girth as
big as one’s arm in the largest part. Its tail tapers suddenly. One
sees in the strongly-keeled scales the ‘prominences’ alluded to by
Dr. Wucherer; and as the fangs are represented life-size on p. 360,
the reader can judge for himself about the ‘four-inch nails.’ Mine
is probably a nearly full-grown serpent, therefore an average-size
specimen, and much the same as the one brought<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_427" id="Page_427">[427]</a></span> to the Gardens in the
summer of 1881, which lingered a pitiable object for six or eight
months, eating nothing, and gradually wasting.</p>

<p>The <i>Jararaca</i> is a slighter snake, and in colour of an olive tint with
darker markings, not unlike Xenodon’s jagged leaf pattern along the
back. Its right to the name of <i>Craspedocephalus</i> (<i>craspedo</i>, derived
from a Greek word signifying an edge or border) is recognised by a
peculiar ridge round its flat, angular, and almost lance-shaped head.
It is also a <i>Trigonocephalus</i> and a <i>Bothrops</i>. My specimen being only
half-grown is about three feet long, and the thickness of your little
finger. ‘Is there not great confusion in the application of the terms
<i>craspedoceph.</i> and <i>trigonoceph.</i>?’ wrote Dr. Stradling, on sending me
these much-prized specimens. Yes, there certainly is; but by this time
the reader sees the reason for this, and also for the many appellatives
which they derive from the Fates and the Furies. Not to weary the
reader with further lists of names, I will refer him to Gray’s
<i>Catalogue of the British Museum Snakes</i>, p. 5, for <i>the</i> accepted
<i>Jararaca</i> of the authorities, and to Dumeril, tome vii. pt. ii. p.
1509, for the same; both authors giving the numerous synonyms, and the
latter the reasons for many of them. The student will there see how
Wagler is supposed to have described young snakes as different species;
and if further investigation be invited, a good deal of entertainment
may be had from Wagler himself and his folio volume,<a name="FNanchor_128_128" id="FNanchor_128_128"></a><a href="#Footnote_128_128" class="fnanchor">[128]</a> <i>Serpentum
Braziliensis</i>, with its wonderful coloured illustrations. Then for
the <i>Curucucu</i>, the <i>Lachesis mutus</i> of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_428" id="Page_428">[428]</a></span> modern ophiologists, see p.
13 of Gray, and p. 1486, tome vii. pt. ii. of Dumeril et Bibron. From
these authors we may go back to Marcgrave, 1648, for the ‘<i>Cvrvcvcv
Braziliensibus</i>, fifteen palms long, truculent and much to be feared.’
Marcgrave’s book is embellished with marvellous pictures which are not
likely to enlighten us much; but through him we are enabled to identify
some of his serpents with the vernaculars, for, like the Pilgrim
Purchas, the vernaculars were all he had to guide him.</p>

<p>Authorities recognise six or seven species of <i>Craspedocephalus</i>,
presumably all having the easily distinguishable edge like a thin cord
round their heads, and which doubtless were the ‘prominent Veines’
described by Purchas in the Brazilian species, now generally recognised
as ‘<i>the</i> Jararaca.’ I will invite my readers to ‘co-operate’ and
call no harmless little snakes by this name, which originally implied
something terrible.</p>

<p>‘And what is the outcome of all this etymological jumble?’</p>

<p>‘Well, we at least learn that as in English the words snake, adder,
serpent, have a somewhat general signification, so have some of the
Brazilian vernaculars. But I cannot help thinking that many of these
names had more of natural history in them than we are apt to suspect,
though no doubt the original meaning has become much corrupted during
three hundred years’ colonization. The native races knew quite well
that some snakes were dangerous and some harmless, which is more than
can be said for the present occupiers of South America, who think all
venomous as a matter of a course.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_429" id="Page_429">[429]</a></span></p>

<p>The differences in spelling the same word may guide us in the
pronunciation of it; as, for example, the <i>c</i> sometimes as <i>k</i>, in
Camoudi, or Kamoodi, and as <i>s</i> in Curucoocu or Sooroocoocoo. In these
latter words we also find the <i>u</i> identical with <i>oo</i>, as in the Hindû
or Hindoo words. Again, the <i>j</i> is as <i>i</i> in <i>Jararaca</i> or <i>Iararacca</i>,
or more probably a sound with which we are unfamiliar, as the word is
sometimes <i>Shiraraca</i>. The frequent transposition of syllables hints
at a meaning which may be worth seeking by a philologist, should he be
also an ophiophilist. Some local information on these points I much
hoped to obtain; but alas! (<i>for this chapter</i>) the trips to Brazil of
my excellent ally came to an end! Independently of which, the native
dialects could only be studied in the far interior, where, here and
there, some tribes may still be found in their pristine simplicity,
though it is very doubtful whether their dialects to-day are those
from which the first European settlers obtained their <i>Curucucus</i> and
<i>Jararacas</i>.</p>

<p>The repetition of syllables in these strange dialects seems to point
at some intention. Can those frequently occurring <i>raras</i> and <i>cucus</i>
represent degrees? For instance, we are told that the Jarrara<i>cucu</i>
is ‘the largest of the Jarraracas.’ And we are quite sure that the
<i>Cucu</i>rijuba, ‘which killeth by winding certain turnes of his tayle,’
is the boa constrictor; and that the <i>Cururiubù</i>, ‘which keepeth
alwaies in the water,’ is the anaconda, these syllables evidently
representing bulk or something formidable: as we have them abounding
in <i>curucucu</i>, the most formidable of all serpents. Then <i>Ibibo</i> might
imply beauty or gay colouring. A snake, <i>Ibiboco</i>, with red and black
rings, ‘the fairest but of foulest venom,’ is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_430" id="Page_430">[430]</a></span> undoubtedly <i>Elaps
lemniscatus</i>; while Ibiboboca, ‘<i>ainsi nommé par sa grande beauté</i>,’ is
‘<i>harmlesse</i>.’ <i>Peba</i> as a termination may imply danger; as there is
the Jararac<i>peba</i>, ‘most venomous,’ and a ‘very venomous’ rattlesnake,
Boicininin<i>peba</i>. The curious repetition of <i>in</i> in <i>Boycininga</i>,
rattlesnake (p. 272), seems to hint at the length of its rattle and
the degree of crepitation it produces, especially as we find the
substitution of <i>g</i> for <i>c</i> in some of these words, and the soft <i>gi</i>
rapidly repeated is not unlike the true sound.</p>

<p>There is a long and slender tree snake ‘that eateth eggs, and goeth
faster on the trees than any man can runne on the ground, with
a motion not unlike swimming.’ Its correspondingly long name is
<i>Guiaranpiaquana</i>! Vain indeed would be any speculation as to what that
may mean. Vain also, and I fear tedious, may all this guess-work be to
discover meaning and poetry in what may probably be dead languages.
Who shall say how many thousand years ago these singular repetitions
conveyed to the savage mind (but <i>was</i> it savage?) an idea of the
creatures around them?</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-058.jpg" width="250" height="92"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_431" id="Page_431">[431]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-107.jpg" width="500" height="119"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XXIV.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>DO SNAKES INCUBATE THEIR EGGS?</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">WE come now to treat of facts no less interesting than surprising in
ophidian biographies. Already we have recounted almost marvellous
powers possessed by this class of animals&mdash;functions which are
volitionary, such as the management of their trachea, the voluntary
folding back or unfolding of certain teeth, the practical adaptation of
their ribs and coils to what we may almost call manual work, and now,
most astonishing of all, the voluntary deposition or retention of ova,
even of young.</p>

<p>‘Snakes are either oviparous or viviparous,’ is what we are accustomed
to read, followed by the explanation that the former are those which
lay eggs, and the latter those which produce their young alive. To
these two chief distinctions, the more recent one of ovoviviparous
has been added, to describe some intermediate cases where the egg is
ruptured in parturition, so that again a fully-formed young one is
born. For broad distinctions the three terms<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_432" id="Page_432">[432]</a></span> do well enough, though
many exceptions exist. The grand distinction of ‘<i>viper</i>’ as applied
to those snakes which produce live young, was adopted when snakes were
first observed and described by classic writers.</p>

<p>‘Vipers alone are viviparous,’ wrote Aristotle. ‘Sometimes the little
vipers eat through their mother and come forth. The viper brings forth
one at a time in one day, but she brings forth more than twenty little
vipers. Other serpents produce their eggs externally, and these eggs
are connected with each other like the necklaces of women. But when
they bring forth, they deposit their eggs in the earth, <i>and there
incubate them</i>. These eggs they disclose the following year.’ We do not
quote the above as all fact, but rather to show how very much there has
been to <i>unlearn</i> since Aristotle was accepted as an authority. The
shadow of truth and the mention of a possible fact as an invariable
rule are dangerous mistakes, for, as we have already shown, where a
snake is concerned, one can rarely feel safe in asserting anything as
positive. It is not impossible that, owing to disease or accident,
some gravid viper may have been so wounded as to enable her young to
make their début through her ruptured side. Such an occurrence has
been seen in our own time. Aristotle or his authority may even have
witnessed such an accident, and recorded it under the supposition that
it was normal. In whatever way the error may have originated, it is
only one out of many that are propagated even to the present day by the
uninformed.</p>

<p>At the moment of writing, we read in one of our first-class ‘dailies,’
alluding to a brood of young vipers lately born at the Zoological
Gardens: ‘The young viper comes into<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_433" id="Page_433">[433]</a></span> the world in the shape of an
egg, and its first business is to push through the filmy membrane
which envelops it in its imprisoned form.’ This is contrary to our
accepted ideas, though partially true in this instance. The word
viper is generally supposed to be derived from the Latin <i>vipera</i>, a
contraction of <i>vivipara</i>, to produce alive. The above words therefore
are inapplicable as a rule.</p>

<p>So far as was known in Aristotle’s time, only certain venomous species
common in the countries with which classic writers were best acquainted
did produce live young, and they were mostly what are still known as
‘vipers,’ a term restricted to these and explained as being derived
from such signification.</p>

<p>Opportunities of study and of observation afforded in menageries and
zoological gardens at the present day have caused the term <i>viper</i> as
relating to gestation to be discarded, or many non-venomous snakes must
be included, thus overthrowing all our notions of vipers. As was shown
in the preceding chapters, the name is now associated with dentition.</p>

<p>German and French ophiologists affirm that the three distinctions of
<i>oviparous</i>, <i>viviparous</i>, and <i>ovoviviparous</i> are founded on no other
ground than the greater or less development of the fœtus at the time of
deposition.</p>

<p>The nature of the egg-covering or ‘shell’ has also to do with this. In
eggs which take a longer time to mature or to ‘hatch,’ the external
covering is thicker and more leathery; in those which are hatched
either before or on deposition, the shell is thinner, more membranous.
Always, however, there is a calcareous element in the shell, and the
eggs are generally, <i>but not invariably</i>, linked together.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_434" id="Page_434">[434]</a></span></p>

<p>Heat and moisture are essential to the hatching of eggs. When at
liberty the snake selects some spot among decaying leaves, or in a
manure heap where decomposition produces sufficient warmth. In the
tropics, where the sun’s rays alone suffice, a soft moist bed is more
easily found, and here it is that immense broods are produced.</p>

<p>The period of gestation can scarcely be pronounced upon with certainty.
It depends not only on the size of the snake, but on the degree of
warmth that can be enjoyed as an assistant to mature the eggs. Schlegel
mentions three or four months from copulation to the laying of eggs in
the species indigenous to France. But as other circumstances combine to
cause variations in these periods, it is very unsafe to fix upon the
precise time of gestation.</p>

<p>Says Rymer Jones, ‘Reptiles do not sit (<i>sic</i>) upon their eggs, hence
the latter have only a membranous envelope. In many of the reptiles
which lay eggs, especially the <i>Colubri</i> (colubrine snakes), the
young one is already formed and considerably advanced in the egg at
the moment when the mother lays it; and it is the same with those
species which may at pleasure be rendered viviparous by retarding their
laying.’<a name="FNanchor_129_129" id="FNanchor_129_129"></a><a href="#Footnote_129_129" class="fnanchor">[129]</a> The latter words are traced to Cuvier, and prove that
this most remarkable power has long been recognised.</p>

<p>In the first few words of the above, Jones spoke of reptiles generally
from toads to turtles; with the latter, soft eggs would certainly fare
badly did they attempt to incubate them. Still the term ‘reptiles’ is
misleading, because, as is now well known, some snakes do incubate,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_435" id="Page_435">[435]</a></span>
and some lizards are suspected of doing the same. Even our common ring
snake has been found coiled upon her eggs.</p>

<p>Serpents are allied to birds in producing young from eggs, but in
reptiles the eggs differ from those of birds in undergoing a sort of
incubation from the very first; so that at whatever period a snake’s
egg is examined, whether it has been laid or not, the embryo will
be found more or less advanced. Sometimes in an egg just deposited,
a perfectly formed fœtus will be found. ‘Serpents are <i>always</i>
oviparous,’ says Schlegel; ‘and it is a mistake to suppose that all
venomous snakes produce live young, and all non-venomous kinds lay
eggs. Neither has the diversity of generation any relation to the
organization of the animal itself. <i>Coronella lævis</i> produces living
young, but other <i>coronellas</i> lay eggs. In 1862, when very little was
known of the <i>Coronella lævis</i>, Mr. Frank Buckland had one in a cage in
London, which to the surprise of most persons produced live young ones.
This may have been solely owing to her captivity and her retention
of eggs till hatched. Some boas lay eggs, others are viviparous. In
the latter case the young are enclosed in a thin membrane, which they
tear or break at the moment of birth. In those that are a long while
hatching, the tunic is of a thick, coriaceous texture, not easily
ruptured. Thus, to sum up with one other authority, Der Hœven: ‘In many
serpents and lizards the development begins in the body of the parent
before the egg is laid, and in some the membrane of the egg is broken
by the young one before birth.’</p>

<p>This latter condition has been considered viperine, but<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_436" id="Page_436">[436]</a></span> even in a
viper the young have been produced in a membrane. This was the case
with <i>Vipera nasicornis</i> at the London Zoological Gardens, on Sunday,
November 6th, 1881, that gave birth to forty-six viperlings. Some of
them had no vestige of membrane clinging about them; others had, but
burst it immediately and began to crawl; while yet others did not burst
their ‘shell’ at all,&mdash;if indeed so filmy and thin a membrane could
be called a shell,&mdash;but died within it. When the membrane burst, it
was seen to collapse and shrivel up into nothing, as children’s air
balls do when they are torn; but the texture of these balls is strong
in comparison with the extreme tenuity of the viperine egg tunic. Yet
it was strong enough to contain a young one, as in the case of those
unbroken. There is no means of ascertaining the precise length of time
this viper had been in captivity; but as her young ones had all such
fully-developed fangs, and the precocity to strike and kill a mouse as
soon as born, this was probably another case of postponed deposition.
On a previous occasion, September 1875, a family of young vipers born
at the Ophidarium were ‘<i>some quite clean and others with the remains
of the egg covering about them</i>.’ The quotation from my notebook refers
to the Daboia of India, ‘Russell’s viper’ (<i>Vipera elegans</i>). Still
these may be exceptional and possibly abnormal cases, but are examples
worth noting, and another proof of the many exceptions to what we are
accustomed to believe invariable rules.</p>

<p>White, in his <i>History of Selborne</i>, mentions the capture of a viper
in which he found fifteen young, the shortest being seven inches. They
were active, spiteful, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_437" id="Page_437">[437]</a></span> menacing, and yet ‘had no manner of fangs
that we could find, even with the help of our glasses.’</p>

<p>Mr. Frank Buckland tells of a man who cut open a string of snake’s
eggs, and the young, thus prematurely introduced into the world,
‘showed fight.’</p>

<p>Of historical ophidians which have figured in many pages, first comes
chronologically the Paris python, that in 1841 laid fifteen eggs and
incubated them. She has already been alluded to in chap. iv., but
claims further mention presently.</p>

<p>A python in the Amsterdam collection next hatched twenty-two eggs.</p>

<p>In 1862 a python at the London Gardens laid above a hundred
eggs,&mdash;‘more than a bushel,’ according to the keeper,&mdash;and settled
herself to hatch them. Much interest attaches itself to this lady’s
history; but first to complete our list chronologically, the following
harmless species in the London collection have within the last ten
years produced live young, being examples of that ‘diversity of
generation’ of which Schlegel speaks.</p>

<p>August 1872, the ‘seven-banded snake’ (<i>Trop. leberis</i>) had five young
and some eggs at the same time.</p>

<p>June 1873, a <i>Coluber natrix</i> had seven young ones. (I cannot affirm
positively that these were born alive; I think not, from an especial
entry in my notebook concerning them; but the records of the Zoological
Society in which I have sought for confirmation do not announce them as
‘hatched.’)</p>

<p>August 1873, a yellow Jamaica boa (<i>Chilobothrus inornatus</i>) gave birth
to fourteen young ones, ten of which survived. They crawled up to the
top of their cage as soon as they<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_438" id="Page_438">[438]</a></span> saw daylight, and showed signs of
fight. One little aggressor struck at me when I held it, and tried
to bite me through my glove,&mdash;an impertinence which was permitted in
order to test its powers. It constricted my fingers as tightly as if
a strong cord were wound round them, and when not thus occupied it
wriggled and twisted itself about in such energetic contortions that
I could scarcely hold it. The activity and daring of the whole fry
proved their perfect development. On another occasion the same species
produced eight, and on a third occasion thirty-three young ones, but of
these dates I am not quite sure. In some cases a few eggs were produced
at the same time, but they were hard and bad and of the consistency
of soap. The manners and actions of the three equally well-developed
families were similar. They were always on the defensive, and able to
fight their own battles. When the keeper put his hand into the cage,
they seized upon it and held on with their teeth so tightly that on
raising it they hung wriggling and undulating like a living, waving
tassel.</p>

<p>Another boa from Panama, on 30th June 1877, had twenty young, which
displayed ability to take care of themselves forthwith by leaving
the marks of their teeth on Holland’s fingers. These twenty were all
produced during the night, or before the arrival of the keeper the next
morning, and were lively and spiteful, biting any one who attempted
to touch them, and sharply enough to draw blood. Mr. E. W. Searle,
who described them in <i>Land and Water</i> at the time, July 1877, said:
‘This is probably the first recorded instance of the breeding of boa
constrictors<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_439" id="Page_439">[439]</a></span> in captivity.’ He seemed also to infer that this proved
the boa to be viviparous instead of oviparous, as ‘had been always
understood.’ Having already known of cases of abnormal, and also of
postponed production of eggs or of young, I ventured at the time to
cite such cases in <i>Land and Water</i>, July 7, 1877, adding: ‘We must not
too hastily conclude that because one boa constrictor produced a family
of lively young ones, this species is invariably viviparous.’ Also in
the <i>Field</i>, July 14, 1877, I suggested that ‘the circumstance might be
received rather as a further example of snakes breeding under abnormal
conditions,’&mdash;opinions further confirmed by subsequent observations.</p>

<p>The little fry were supplied with young mice, which they constricted
as if they had served an apprenticeship; but the mother left them
entirely to themselves, and betrayed no other unusual feelings than to
hiss when disturbed. When they were seven weeks old, they in one night
ate twenty-four mice and a few young rats between them. They all cast
their first coat before they were a week old. The mother had been in
the Gardens about eight years. All but one of this fine family were
alive in the following November, and two are still living at the time
of going to press, viz. ‘Totsey’ (illus. p. 201) and one brother.</p>

<p>The dates of these few following cases are a little uncertain, also
exactly how many survived of those that were born.</p>

<p>A ‘seven-banded’ snake (<i>Trop. leberis</i>) had six.</p>

<p>A ‘chicken snake’ (<i>Col. eximius</i>).</p>

<p>A ‘moccasin snake’ (<i>Tropidonotus fasciatus</i>) had nine<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_440" id="Page_440">[440]</a></span> young ones.
This species has sometimes produced young and eggs at the same time.</p>

<p>A ‘garter snake’ (<i>Tropidonotus ordinatus</i>).</p>

<p>A boa constrictor had eight pretty little active snakelings that at
two days old pretended to constrict my fingers, and forcibly enough to
prove their powers.</p>

<p>On two occasions at the Gardens within the time specified, hybrids have
been born between <i>Epicratis angulifer</i> and <i>Chilobothrus inornatus</i>,
and I can but think that occurrences of this nature must happen among
snakes in their wild state occasionally, which may throw some light on
the perplexities of classifiers.</p>

<p>In August 1878, three were born alive; and in recording the event the
Secretary to the Zoological Society, P. Lutley Sclater, Esq., Ph.D.,
F.R.S., etc., writes that there can be no question as to the pairing
of these two snakes, both in the same cage, and as there was no male
<i>Epicratis</i> in the collection. Three were alive and six bad eggs were
produced.</p>

<p>In September 1879, two more hybrids were born between the same pair;
who, at any rate, remained constant to each other.</p>

<p>Of the venomous serpents that have fallen under my own notice at
the Zoological Gardens, the little Indian viper (<i>Echis carinata</i>)
had three young ones in July 1875. Only two survived a few weeks.
They changed their coat at an early day, but ate nothing; nor did
the mother, who soon died. One may mention here that the vipers in
collections rarely do survive long after giving birth to young. This
may be only owing to an unhealthy condition in captivity, but merits
inquiry.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_441" id="Page_441">[441]</a></span></p>

<p>Four common adders (<i>Vipera berus</i>) and several broods of the Daboia
have also been produced.</p>

<p>The African viper of the coloured illustration is another example, as
having afforded opportunities for observation.</p>

<p>In point of numbers we find the families varying from three or four
to upwards of a hundred. When the parent is in health, the young
are produced easily and rapidly. <i>Vipera nasicornis</i> deposited her
forty-six children within about three hours. A Java snake (though
not in our London Ophidarium) produced twenty-four young ones in
twenty minutes. Anaconda, in April 1877, on the contrary, exhibited
considerable protraction, extruding bad eggs at irregular intervals for
many days. She will form the subject of the next chapter.</p>

<p>Incubation, or the hatching of eggs by the maternal warmth, seems not
to have been suspected by ophiologists until a comparatively recent
date; but by the non-scientific, the barbarian and the untutored
natives of hot countries, who see, but dream not that in future ages
what they saw and incidentally spoke of would be of weight to the
enlightened of as yet unexisting nations,&mdash;by such the fact was known
long ere its worth <i>as a fact</i> was recognised. Yet, as has been already
seen in these pages, evidence given without intent and purpose often
is of scientific importance. Aristotle spoke of incubation; but with
classic writers the difficulty of sifting fact from fable may cause the
whole to be rejected.</p>

<p>We owe to Zoological Societies and menageries the confirmation of
the <i>couvaison</i> of at least one species of serpents. Subsequently we
are told, ‘The python only incubates,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_442" id="Page_442">[442]</a></span>’ this snake being generally
mentioned as the one exception; and only within a very few years has
maternal affection been accredited to any others. Mr. P. H. Gosse was
informed by the negroes in Jamaica of the habits of the yellow boa. Sir
Joseph Fayrer was informed by the jugglers that ‘over and over again
they had dug cobras out of their holes <i>sitting on their eggs</i>.’ Dr. E.
Nicholson was informed ‘on trustworthy authority that the Hamadryad has
been found coiled upon a nest of evidently artificial construction.’ He
thinks snakes always watch over their eggs, and frequent the locality
where they have deposited them. The keeper at the Gardens confirms
this by his own observations. ‘They do care for their eggs in their
own way,’ he assured me, and display unusual irritability and wildness
at such times.<a name="FNanchor_130_130" id="FNanchor_130_130"></a><a href="#Footnote_130_130" class="fnanchor">[130]</a> In menageries, however, their habits are always
more or less artificial; they cannot seek spots for themselves, or
exercise maternal instinct beyond doing the best they can under the
circumstances. Anything in the way of extra indulgences, such as soft
rubbish, moss, or sand, is duly appreciated when eggs are about to be
deposited, and we find maternal ophidians resort at once to this.</p>

<p>In a footnote, vol. xvi. p. 65 of the <i>Annales des sciences
naturelles</i>, we read:&mdash;‘<i>Il parait que l’incubation des serpents
est un fait si connu dans l’Inde, qu’il entre même dans leur contes
populaires. M. Roulin m’a fait remarquer dans le<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_443" id="Page_443">[443]</a></span> second voyage de
Sindbad le marin</i> (<i>nouvelle traduction Anglaise des ‘Mille et une
nuits’ par W. Lane</i>, tom. iii. p. 20) <i>le passage suivant: Alors je
regardai dans la caverne, et vis, au fond, un enorme serpent endormi
sur ses œufs</i>.’</p>

<p>Here again, by accident, an ophidian habit known in the 8th century has
been revealed to the scientific of the 19th century.</p>

<p>In the 17th century, when the Royal Society was founded and scientific
information of all descriptions was welcome in their published
<i>Transactions</i>, the subject of serpent brooding appeared in those
pages. In vol. i. p. 138, a few terse words exactly express what modern
ophiologists have of late years verified. ‘Several have taken notice
that there is a difference between the brooding of Snakes and Vipers;
those laying their Eggs in Dung-hills by whose warmth they are hatched,
but these (Vipers) brooding their Eggs within their Bellies, and
bringing forth live Vipers. To which may be added,&mdash;That some affirm to
have seen Snakes lye upon their Eggs as Hens sit upon theirs.’ This was
published in 1665.</p>

<p>The truth of ophidian incubation in at least one species was finally
established at the <i>Musée d’Histoire</i> at Paris in 1841, when <i>Python
bivittatus</i> or <i>Python à deux-raies</i>&mdash;named from two black lines
diverging from the mouth&mdash;incubated her fifteen eggs. This celebrated
serpent has enriched zoological annals in several points of interest.
She assisted to confirm the question of whether snakes drink, and, as
will be seen, whether they will take dead food. In connection with
the present subject, the observations made by M. Dumeril during her
incubation in the months of May<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_444" id="Page_444">[444]</a></span> and June 1841 are of such interest
that I will translate from a paper read at the <i>Academy of Sciences</i>
in Paris, by M. Valenciennes, 19th July 1841, and published in the
<i>Annales des sciences naturelles</i>, tom. xvi. 2<sup>me</sup> série, p. 65. It
will be remembered that M. Dumeril (to whom we are indebted for the
most complete work on <i>Erpétologie générale</i> that graces the shelves of
our Great National Library) was at that time Professeur d’Erpétologie
au Musée de Paris, and specially charged with the management of that
part of the menagerie.</p>

<p>M. Valenciennes began his paper by reminding his audience that the
temperature of birds rises in various degrees during the period of
incubation, proposing the questions, ‘Do reptiles not offer a similar
phenomenon?’ ‘Do they never brood on their eggs?’ As far as was known
of native reptiles, the answer would be in the negative. However, M.
Lamarrepiquot, in his travels in Chandernagor and the isle of Bourbon,
seems to show that a large serpent of India, and some other species,
<i>se plaçait sur ses œufs et les echauffait en developpant pendant ce
temps une chaleur notable</i>. Many eminent naturalists doubted this,
until it was confirmed in the Paris python, in which was an example of
prolonged and uninterrupted incubation for the space of fifty-six days.</p>

<p>M. Valenciennes proceeded to describe that she was in a cage with
others, and that a temperature higher than the outside air was
maintained. During January and February she coupled several times,
and in February ate six or seven pounds of raw beef that was tied on
to a live rabbit of middling size. Food offered her afterwards, for
three weeks in succession, she refused; but, as described in chap.
iv.,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_445" id="Page_445">[445]</a></span> she drank no less than five times during her brooding. Sloughing
occurred on the 4th April. Generally gentle and quiet, she became
excited on the 5th May, and tried to bite any one who approached her.
Her condition being evident, she had been left alone and undisturbed
in her cage; and at six o’clock on the morning of the 6th of May, laid
an egg, fourteen others being deposited by half-past nine A.M. The
eggs were soft at first, of an oval form, and an ashy-grey colour,
but afterwards became rounder and of a clear white. They were all
separate. She collected them in a cone-shaped pile, and rolled herself
round them, so as to completely hide every one, her head being at the
summit of the cone. For fifty-six days she kept perfectly motionless,
excepting when manifesting impatience if any one attempted to touch
her eggs. Notwithstanding this want of trustfulness on the part of the
interesting invalid, M. Dumeril achieved some important experiments
regarding her temperature.</p>

<p>Reptiles are ‘obedient to the surrounding temperature,’ we may repeat,
but in the present instance there was warmth in her perceptible to
the touch (<i>une chaleur notable</i>). The temperature of the cage was
20° (Reaumur?), that under the woollen coverlet where she reposed
was 21°; but in her coils, where M. Dumeril inserted one of the best
thermometers that could be procured, she was 41°, and always of a
higher temperature by some 20°. Placing the thermometer either upon
her or between the folds of her body, only a slight variation was
perceptible, but it was invariably higher than the surrounding air.</p>

<p>On the 2nd of July one of the shells split (<i>la coque s’est
fendillée</i>), and the head of a little python appeared. During<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_446" id="Page_446">[446]</a></span> that
day the little creature only twisted about within its shell, now its
head, now its tail being visible outside, and withdrawn again. The next
day the wee snake made its debut altogether, and began to crawl about
(<i>s’est mise à ramper</i>). It lost no time in exploring to the remotest
corners of its blanket, and by degrees showed itself to the world.
During the next four days eight were similarly hatched, the seven
remaining eggs, at various stages of development, having apparently
been crushed by superincumbent weight.</p>

<p>The mother, on the 3rd of July, ate six more pounds of beef, after her
fast of nearly five months; but with the posterior part of her body
still folded over the eggs. She then quitted them, and displayed no
further care, having covered them for so long a time, and even defended
them with such assiduity. From ten to fourteen days after being
hatched, the young ones all changed their coats, and then ate some
little sparrows, throwing themselves upon them, and constricting them
like grown-up pythons.</p>

<p>M. Valenciennes drew attention to the circumstance that only in hot
countries do serpents incubate their eggs, <i>i.e.</i> only the serpents
indigenous to hot countries. In temperate ones, where the average
warmth is insufficient, they resort to artificial heat; as, for
instance, manure heaps, or decaying vegetation.</p>

<p>Thus was this important question settled, and the hatching of the young
brood in Paris became a chronological era in ophidian annals.</p>

<p>When therefore, in January 1862, twenty-one years afterwards, a python
<i>seba</i> in our own Gardens laid upwards of a hundred eggs, immense
interest and curiosity were excited<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_447" id="Page_447">[447]</a></span> among the zoologists of the day,
for here at home in London was a grand opportunity for observing the
one only snake which at that time was supposed to exhibit any sort of
maternal instinct. Plenty of damp moss had been supplied to her, the
temperature maintained in the cage being supposed sufficient for her
well-being. She pushed the moss into a kind of nest, and when the ‘long
string of eggs’ were deposited, she arranged them in a nearly level
mass, and then coiled herself over and around them so as to hide and
cover them as much as possible. Sometimes she changed her position a
little, and re-arranged her eggs, and in various ways rendered herself
worthy of record.</p>

<p>Ophiologists had scientific facts to verify: this opportunity must
not be neglected for ascertaining whether so cold a nature, and in
midwinter, could produce sufficient warmth by lying there day after
day upon her bushel of eggs. So thermometers were ever and anon thrust
between her coils, or held close to her; first here, then there, after
the example of M. Dumeril in Paris. Other disturbances in the way of
cleaning out the cage and supplying her companion in captivity with
food and water were angrily resented by the poor patient, who had no
chance of the tranquillity that she would have sought for herself in
her native tropics. Besides which, the chances against hatching were
far greater in her case than in the Paris and Amsterdam pythons. The
former saved only eight out of her fifteen, and here we had, in round
numbers, one hundred, more than she could successfully cover at one
time. Moreover, a most untoward accident happened one night by the tank
overflowing among her eggs, necessitating a complete disturbance of
them. What wonder,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_448" id="Page_448">[448]</a></span> then, that she was irritable and even savage during
the whole time of her incubation! One egg, examined fifteen days after
it was laid, contained a living embryo, so there were hopes of some
at least maturing. For more than seven weeks she remained patiently
brooding, when all hope of hatching any of the eggs had vanished, and
it became necessary to take them from her. This was done by degrees,
and the task was no easy one. The keeper watched his opportunity to
raise the sliding door at the back of the cage, make a snatch at those
nearest him, and shut down the slide with celerity, or the exasperated
mother would have seized him. He nearly got his arm broken more than
once by the despatch he was compelled to use. Sometimes, so quick was
she, that in thrusting down the slide she was nearly jammed by it.
Holland protected himself by holding up a corner of the rug so as to
hide himself when he had occasion to open the slide door; yet one day
she ‘jumped’ at him, seizing the rug, and with a toss of her head
jerking it back with such violence that a shower of the gravel came
hailing upon the glass in front of the cage, to the consternation and
alarm of the spectators gathered there, and who at the moment imagined
the glass was broken, and that the infuriated reptile would be among
them. But they were behind her; it was only towards the keeper that her
fury was directed: he had taken away the last of her eggs. When, then,
he shut down the slide, she kept her angry eyes fixed upon it for a
long while. Presently she sought in her empty nest, upon which, so long
as any eggs had remained to her, she had re-settled herself after each
irruption. At last she took to her bath, in which she remained for a
long while.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_449" id="Page_449">[449]</a></span></p>

<p>After the scenes witnessed during those seven weeks, no one could doubt
the existence of maternal affection; and this was worth proving, as
some authors would have persuaded us that snakes, and particularly the
non-venomous ones, manifest total indifference regarding their eggs.
The other important fact, an increased temperature, was also again
observable, proving that a serpent can really hatch her eggs by the
warmth of her own body.</p>

<p>Last summer, 1881, another python laid about twenty eggs at the London
Ophidarium, but, alas! neither were any of that brood hatched. For
future broods, now that the fact of a raised temperature has been
proved, the next scientific triumph will be to develop the young ones,
dispensing with thermometers, and substituting perfect tranquillity,
with every possible aid and comfort to the mother.</p>

<p>That snakes under these peculiar circumstances do appreciate little
‘delicate attentions,’ ample proof has been afforded in the Jamaica
‘yellow boa’ (<i>Chilobothrus inornatus</i>), the species which on several
occasions has produced broods in London, and the one in which Mr. P.
H. Gosse verified the marvellous instinct of withholding its eggs when
circumstances were not propitious for their deposition. This is one of
the ‘Colubri’ alluded to by T. Rymer Jones, ‘which may at pleasure be
rendered’ (<i>i.e.</i> render themselves) ‘viviparous by retarding their
laying.’</p>

<p>But when Gosse published his work on Jamaica (1851), he did not appear
to be aware of what Jones and Cuvier had said on this subject, but
stated the result of his own observations. He had become convinced that
this species of snake forms a sort of nest, and incubates its eggs;
when<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_450" id="Page_450">[450]</a></span> subsequently, one that he had in captivity produced living young,
he was staggered. ‘Is it possible,’ he wrote, ‘that a serpent normally
oviparous, might retain the eggs within the oviduct until the birth of
her young, when circumstances were not propitious?’</p>

<p>‘Is it possible,’ again asks an American naturalist, so lately as
1879,&mdash;‘can it be true that <i>Heterodon platyrhinos</i> and <i>Tropidonotus
sipedon</i>’ (both harmless) ‘are sometimes viviparous and sometimes
ovoviviparous?’ This writer, F. W. Cragin, had been told that the two
above species were ovoviviparous (a word of no value as a definition),
and he writes in the <i>American Naturalist</i>, vol. xiii. p. 710, that out
of twenty-two eggs of Heterodon, ploughed up out of the sand in Long
Island, one he put into alcohol to preserve it as found, and the others
were hatched on the fourth day, showing that sometimes at least it is
oviparous, as supposed are some of the <i>Eutænias</i>.</p>

<p>Mr. Gosse describes one Jamaica boa in confinement, that was ill
and inactive, refusing food. It was unusually vicious, and bit hard
enough to draw blood, the effect of the fine teeth being like a severe
cat-scratch. It rendered itself further offensive when disturbed, by
emitting an insufferable odour, and at length gave birth to living
young.</p>

<p>That this snake when at liberty lays eggs, he had seen, and in a nest
of artificial construction. One that he knew of was excavated in a
bank. The snake was seen issuing from a narrow passage just large
enough to admit it. Dry, crumbled earth had been discharged at the
entrance of the passage, where it lay in a heap. The bank being dug
into, the passage was found to lead to a cavity lined with soft<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_451" id="Page_451">[451]</a></span>
rubbish, leaves, etc., which must have been carried there. Mr. Gosse
does not pretend to affirm positively that the snake constructed that
secluded nest for itself. It might have done so, pushing out the mould
by the lateral undulations of its body, as the burrowing snakes do,
and carrying back the soft trash in its mouth or, if it only chose a
nest formed by some other animal, this proved maternal care. There
were eggs in the nest, the shell being like ‘white kid.’ ‘On snipping
one, a clear glaire exuded, in which was a large, whitish vitellus,
stained with blood vessels, and containing a young snake seven inches
long, but immature.’ One fœtus writhed. The fœtus being formed and
capable of motion, proved, Mr. Gosse thought, that the eggs had been
some time laid. Incubation is a characteristic of that family, the
author affirms. Of the various cases he knew, one female boa brought
forth eleven snakes. In another snake that was killed, ten or twelve
fully-formed young ones were found.</p>

<p>One of these ‘yellow boas’ in a private collection displayed unusual
restlessness and uneasiness, crawling about its cage as if in search
of something. Those who had the care of it suspected that she was with
eggs, and supplied her with fine sand. This appeased her somewhat, and
after twirling herself around to form it into a kind of nest, she laid
some eggs. One of the same kind at the Gardens accepted gratefully some
soft cotton wool which a lady brought for her and her young progeny,
all of whom nestled themselves in it contentedly and speedily.</p>

<p>Two other noteworthy cases have to be recorded, but they shall form the
subject of the ensuing chapters.</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_452" id="Page_452">[452]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-027.jpg" width="500" height="106"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XXV.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>ANACONDA AND ANGUIS FRAGILIS.</i></p>


<p class="drop-cap06">MAXIMUS and <span class="smcap">Minimus</span>. Yet by right of its name <i>Anguis</i>, our little
slow-worm&mdash;truly a lizard&mdash;claims a place in these pages; by right
of form also, and by right of promise; and still further, because on
the authority of some of our eminent physiologists there is in the
dentition of some of the boas an affinity with lizards; and inasmuch
as this little limbless lizard affords a good example of those whose
ancestry, as Huxley tells us, found it profitable to do without their
legs and become snakes, she shall be introduced in company with the
largest of all her ophidian cousins.</p>

<p>Anaconda also, in having vestiges of hind limbs, affords in these
another example of what Darwin calls atrophied organs, remnants of what
were once, no doubt, a pair of very excellent saurian legs.</p>

<p>Illustrious naturalists who were authorities in their day&mdash;as, for
instance, Linnæus and Cuvier&mdash;included slow-worms with serpents, the
links between them being so close.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_453" id="Page_453">[453]</a></span> They have also been included among
the burrowing snakes, many of which have no better right to the name
of <i>Anguis</i>. With the advance of herpetology more minute distinctions
of classification occur, and anatomy now proves in the ‘brittle snake’
a stronger relationship to lizards than to serpents. It has eyelids,
like the lizards; no palate teeth, non-extensible jaw-bones, and more
consolidated head-bones; so that you never see the facial distortion
in these lizard-snakes when feeding, that is so striking in the true
ophidians. It has scales alike all round, and also a distinct neck and
a vestige of sternum and pelvic bones whence formerly two pairs of legs
proceeded. From an evolutionary point of view, therefore, it is even in
advance of Anaconda, which has still its ‘spurs’ to get rid of.</p>

<p>Space need not here be occupied in a recapitulation of other features
and the manners and habits of <i>Anguis fragilis</i> beyond what the subject
in hand demands; and in connection with this our two anguine heroines
will be found to display one other striking feature in common. For the
rest, in Bell’s <i>British Reptiles</i> it is treated at length. In Wood’s
<i>Natural History</i>, also, there is a long and minute account of the
slow-worm, including details of a most interesting character, as being
gathered from personal observations.</p>

<p>Anaconda, however, claims historical priority.</p>

<p>As a water snake it has already been partially described (p. 228), and
some of its synonyms were given in explanation of its scientific name
<i>Eunectes</i>, to trace its right to be included among the water snakes,
and <i>murinus</i>, to show the nature of its food. Being a native of
tropical America&mdash;which embraces many extensive countries and includes
numerous<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_454" id="Page_454">[454]</a></span> tribes of the aboriginal inhabitants&mdash;this serpent is also
known under numerous vernaculars, puzzling enough to the reader of
travels who does not at first sight realize that the book in which he
now reads of the <i>Matatoro</i> describes one region, and the volume in
which he has read of the <i>Sucariuba</i> or of the <i>Jacumama</i> describes
another, and that these are one and the same snake. The spelling and
pronunciation of even the same word among adjacent tribes add to the
perplexity. Among other of Anaconda’s familiar vernaculars, which we
meet with in all South American books of travel, are <i>Aboma</i>, <i>Cucuriù</i>
or <i>Cucuriubù</i>, <i>El trago venado</i>, <i>Camoudi</i> or <i>Kamoudi</i>, <i>Sucurujù</i>,
and others. The name by which it is now generally known, <i>Anaconda</i>, or
<i>Anacondo</i>, was fixed by Cuvier in 1817.</p>

<p>Very exaggerated ideas as to its size have obtained, probably traceable
to Waterton, who tells us the Spaniards of the Oroonoque positively
affirm that he grows to the length of from seventy to eighty feet; and
that as his name <i>Matatoro</i> implies, he will eat the largest bull.
Before yielding full faith to such stories, we must ascertain whether
that ‘bull’ corresponded in dimensions with our Durham prize ox, or the
miniature bovines of the Himalayas. Hartwig improves upon Anaconda’s
dinner capacities in telling us that the ‘Hideous Reptile will engulph
a horse and its rider, or a whole ox’ (prize ox, no doubt) ‘as far as
its horns.’</p>

<p>Turn we to science and to ocular proof of what Anaconda really is&mdash;for
there are and have been living examples in our zoological collections,
and whatever she may have been ‘formerly,’ her modern dimensions rarely
exceed thirty feet.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_455" id="Page_455">[455]</a></span></p>

<p>In the present case her interest lies in her maternal aspect, for
it is the one that was brought to London in 1877 of which we now
speak, and who astonished the ophiological public by giving birth to
fully-developed young ones in April of that year.</p>

<p>In <i>Land and Water</i> of the preceding February, Mr. Frank Buckland
described the arrival of this snake at Liverpool in a box, which with
its occupant weighed over 2 cwt., and of the necessary examination
‘he’ (the snake) was obliged to undergo by Mr. Bartlette previous to
purchase. Being at length conveyed to the Zoological Gardens, ‘he’ was
reported as being thin and as having no inclination to feed, but glad
to remain in ‘his’ bath almost continuously.</p>

<p>It was brought from the vicinity of the Amazons, and must have been
cramped up for many months in this close prison. No wonder it turned at
once into its native element, although the small tank restricted its
movements almost as much as its travelling box. The poor thing was seen
to be suffering discomfort, presumably from its long journey and close
confinement; and one day, when endeavouring to extend itself and move
more at ease in the narrow space between the tank and the front glass,
it forced out the entire frame by the power of its coils. Fortunately
the huge python and two other Anacondas in the same cage at the time
were in a torpid condition; or had those four powerful snakes been
lively or spiteful, and all at liberty at this crisis, grave results
might have accrued. Aid being at hand, the loosened frame was promptly
re-adjusted; but this practical illustration of Anaconda’s powers was a
useful lesson to snake keepers.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_456" id="Page_456">[456]</a></span></p>

<p>The peculiar condition of this snake not being suspected, not even
her sex, the appearance of two fully-developed though dead young ones
on April 2d was an important event in the Ophidarium, and one to be
forthwith chronicled in the <i>Zoological Society’s Proceedings</i>. The
secretary, at the ensuing meeting, exhibited the two young Anacondas,
and afforded some interesting details concerning the mother. During
the next few days four more young ones were born, but all dead; and
during several weeks, others in a high state of decomposition were
produced. ‘She might have had a hundred!’ said the keeper, who felt
fully persuaded that she had voluntarily ‘kept them back.’ Four were
well developed; one was partly coiled in the ruptured shell, which was
of a tough, coriaceous texture, white, and as thick as orange peel.</p>

<p>Occurrences of this nature send us to our book-shelves. The python and
some of the boas had laid eggs, and Anaconda might have been expected
to do the same, as we read in the papers that wrote ‘leaders’ on the
event. But suddenly we all discover (‘<i>we</i>’ second and third rate
naturalists, who regard the biological professors at a respectful
distance, and aspire only to a printed half column in a similarly
aspiring journal),&mdash;we all discover that Cuvier had long ago pointed
out that <i>l’Eunect murin</i> is viviparous (like the regular water
snakes), and that Schlegel had subsequently confirmed the fact from
personal observation. Thus we learn as we go.</p>

<p>Those born dead in London offered no exception, therefore, to the rule,
but were rather to be regarded as one of those cases in which the
mother, under circumstances unpropitious<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_457" id="Page_457">[457]</a></span> for the production of her
progeny, retards the deposition of her eggs or her young.</p>

<p>Let us picture to ourselves the condition of this poor Anaconda. Just
at the very time when instinct would have guided her to the spot most
favourable for the coming brood, she is transferred from her native
lagoons, and crowded into a dark close box just large enough to contain
her. Though without water for many months, this ‘good swimmer’ arrives
alive, a proof of her astonishing powers of endurance; but she has now
no morass, no lagoon or refreshing river in which to invigorate herself
and aid her natural functions, and the young ones die unborn. The poor
mother soon showed evidence of disease and suffering, and was after a
time mercifully put to death.</p>

<p>There was no possibility of ascertaining the period of gestation in
her case, but there was every reason to regard it as one of postponed
functions, and another illustration of that astonishing capability
described by ophiologists of snakes which ‘may at pleasure,’ <i>i.e.</i> at
will, retard the laying of eggs or birth of young!</p>

<p>The prejudice against snakes has been so strong, that there are persons
who would even exclude them from zoological collections. Should these
pages fall under the eye of such persons, they must admit that the
Ophidia in captivity present grand opportunities towards the attainment
of scientific knowledge. These important results far outweigh the less
pleasing spectacles.</p>

<p class="p2">And now for our little <i>Anguis fragilis</i>, with all her wrong names and
the wrong impressions produced thereby,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_458" id="Page_458">[458]</a></span> which, with some particulars
of her behaviour in captivity, shall form the subject of the next
chapter. Here she will, I think, be accepted among those examples of
abnormal incubation which belong to the present one.</p>

<p>Searching for the lovely little <i>Drosera</i> and its attendant exquisite
mosses on ‘The Common’ at Bournemouth (the one close to the town), on
the look-out for lizards also, I saw what at first sight appeared to
be an extremely long, black slug, lying on a smooth little patch of
grass in the sunshine. Approaching to inspect this shining nondescript,
I at once recognised a slow-worm. Being not only entirely and deeply
black, but unusually short and proportionately thicker than any I had
ever seen, the familiar ‘worm’ had not at first sight been identified.
Its short, blunt tail had evidently lost an inch or two; and its bulk
suggested a speedy increase of family. Already I had four others and
a green lizard, the male <i>Lacerta agilis</i>, which I had also captured.
The date of ‘Blackie’s’ capture was August 26, 1879; the precise time
being important, because, as just now stated, the period of gestation
depends much on the degree of external warmth that can be had to assist
in maturing the embryo; and, as many of my readers will recollect, very
little sunshine had we that summer. Chilly rains and cloudy weather
marked the season; and to this I attributed the fact that at the end of
August the slow-worm was still enceinte, when, as Bell informs us, its
ordinary time to produce young is June or July.</p>

<p>Taking her up, ‘Blackie’ struggled and kicked, if such a remnant
of tail can be said to ‘kick’ (the action being very similar), and
displayed activity enough to show that she<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_459" id="Page_459">[459]</a></span> could be quick enough when
occasion required it. Knowing her shy, burrowing instincts, I at once
laid her on the mosses which filled my little basket, and down she
retreated, there remaining without further trouble.</p>

<p>Deposited in a box with the others, she acted similarly, remaining
hidden under the sand and moss, and never showing herself on the
surface, as the rest did whenever a hopeful gleam of sunshine tempted
them. Just the tip of her little black, shining nose was sometimes
visible, as if she were getting a breath of fresh air on the sly.</p>

<p>One of the other slow-worms&mdash;already several weeks in my
possession&mdash;had appeared to be in a similar condition, and was much
wilder than the rest, effecting escape and circumventing me in a
variety of ways, while her companions were comparatively tame and
contented. The green lizard, also, had to be well watched, being
exceedingly active, darting away like a flash whenever the cover of the
box was removed for an instant. Their cage was necessarily and cruelly
small, in anticipation of a journey to London, and that I might have
them in my own keeping while on the move, which I expected to be for
some weeks. It was covered with a net secured by a strong elastic; but
they could easily reach the top, and managed most cleverly to push up
this net, and so get out. The way in which one of them called ‘Lizzie’
achieved this, is described in the ensuing chapter. Here we must keep
to our subject.</p>

<p>The box was generally close to an open window, in order to catch any
chance ray of sunshine; but the truant propensities of the inmates
necessitated a frequent investigation, and a raking up of the moss
and sand with which they<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_460" id="Page_460">[460]</a></span> were supplied, much too often for Blackie’s
peace of mind. She continued wild and alarmed, defeating search by
quick movements below. The ever active lizard, too, had frequently to
be hunted out; for whether he had retreated below, or had gone off
altogether, could not be ascertained unless the box and its inmates
were turned out bodily to count heads&mdash;a species of roll-call not
tending to tranquillize the unquiet pair. These trifles are mentioned
to show the sort of life the poor little captives led for many weeks.
They were raked over or turned out literally topsy-turvy every few
hours. Only at night had they any peace; for being well disposed
reptiles, who kept regular hours and retired early to rest, but <i>not</i>
rising betimes in the morning, they could be safely left uncovered
until and unless sunshine enticed them upwards.</p>

<p>All ate and drank regularly but Blackie, who, so far as I was able to
ascertain, was a total abstainer.</p>

<p>Thus, in their incommodious box, they lived until the middle of
October, when (after making visits on the way, and secretly harbouring
my ‘snakes’ like stolen booty) I arrived in London. At that time the
sun seemed trying to atone for its summer deficiencies, and whenever
any of its grateful warmth could be obtained through the London
atmosphere the lizards were deposited in a window, but Blackie remained
always below. Suddenly she also grew refractory. She got out of the
box, and had frequent falls from the table to the floor. So had the
other restless one, necessitating still more frequent roll-calls, and
bringing troublous times on themselves. I had observed in a former pet,
that when the season of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_461" id="Page_461">[461]</a></span> hibernation was approaching, <i>Anguis fragilis</i>
had exhibited an errant disposition, and I had attributed it to a
natural instinct to seek a winter retreat; but in the present case only
these two tried to get away, and in both there appeared to be a similar
motive.</p>

<p>On one occasion, late in October, Blackie could not be found for
several days, and was even given up for lost, when, on removing a
number of books that, when unpacked, had been temporarily stacked
against the wall, there lay the little black slow-worm in so narrow a
space between a quarto volume and the wall that it seemed impossible
she could have got there. Strange to tell, the poor little thing no
longer struggled to get away, but seemed even glad to be lifted and
fondled and restored to her moss.</p>

<p>On the 2nd November, some frosty days having arrived, and no more
worms and flies being procurable, I thought it time to put them away
for their winter sleep, having been so instructed by Mr. Green, the
taxidermist at Bournemouth, of whom I had purchased several. So, having
dismissed all idea of an increase in their numbers, I prepared a large
deep jar and furnished it with soft hay, moss, and sand, enough for
them to burrow into, intending to consign it and them to an attic.</p>

<p>The first thing on the morning of the cold foggy 3rd of November
1879, I went as usual to examine the box and its inmates&mdash;as yet in
my sitting-room. Lifting the moss to count heads, I saw what on the
first glance in that half daylight seemed to be a small tender snail,
apparently injured in some way, and crawling extended in a wonderfully
thin line from its shell. What presented a snail to my<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_462" id="Page_462">[462]</a></span> thoughts was
because a few days previously&mdash;insects being now no more, and other
food hard to procure&mdash;my maid had brought in some small snails as an
offering for the ‘snakes.’ These having been declined, I wondered to
see one in the box, but turned away faint-hearted from the unpleasant
duty of removing a half-crushed snail, as I took it to be.</p>

<p>After being fortified with a hot breakfast, daylight being now
brighter, I began with dainty fingers to remove the moss. Judge of
my amazement to find three of the loveliest little tiny scraps of
life, wriggling, twisting, diving, and defiantly&mdash;let me rather say
intelligently, or instinctively&mdash;using their tongues like grown-up
slow-worms. They were Blackie’s children. Not a doubt about it! Three
were free from the shell, one of which was still connected with it by
an inch or more of the umbilical cord; and within the shell&mdash;a mere
membrane&mdash;was some yellow yoke and a good deal of glaire, so that the
membrane still retained the rounded form. Possibly I had ruptured
this egg in disturbing the moss. There was another egg quite perfect,
and within that could be discerned the little creature curled up, and
presenting those convolutions which in the half light had looked so
like a small snail shell. On tenderly taking up this perfect egg, the
wee reptile within threw itself into such an agitation that it burst
its prison house, and emerged prematurely into the cold, rough world. A
yolk as big as a hemp seed and much of the glaire remained behind. It
was a precisely similar case to that of a young Typhlops in Jamaica,
described by Gosse, where the reptile ‘crawled nimbly out of a ruptured
egg, but remained attached to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_463" id="Page_463">[463]</a></span> vitellus.’ In the present instance
the umbilical slit was ominously gaping, showing that the poor little
creature was not nearly ready to battle with life. In the other that
was not yet wholly detached, the slit was less, and in the two which
had hatched themselves (no doubt during the night) it was nearly closed.</p>

<p>During the day six more were born, and four of the six in the
membranous shell. <i>Anguis fragilis</i> is always considered to be
viviparous; but so are vipers, and here in three distinct cases under
public observation the young have been produced in a membranous
covering.</p>

<p>The activity of these tiny creatures was marvellous. If meddled with,
they seemed as if agitated by a galvanic battery. Their whole length
vibrated with nervous irritability. In colour they were black beneath
and a silvery white above, with a spot of black on the head, and a
fine, thread-like line of black all down their back. The head was the
largest part, the body tapering gradually to the tail. They were in
length about 2-1/2 inches. Very bright black eyes had they, and manners
like the adults, pressing their head against the hand, or wherever
they were, with the instinct to burrow and hide. Their silvery aspect,
together with their mobile susceptibility, was truly mercurial. To hold
or retain them was simply impossible; as well try to restrain a stream
of quicksilver. In a fury of agitation they would leap and turn over
and twist themselves away like eels. Flaccid and tender and apparently
boneless, the difficulty of taking up and restraining such shreds of
vitality was no less difficult than interesting. The wee, half-matured
fury that rushed impetuously into the world spent itself in restless<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_464" id="Page_464">[464]</a></span>
efforts to dive into the earth. It grew gradually more feeble, and died
the third day. Altogether there were eight or more. Three were hatched
before I saw them, the rest were produced in the membranous ‘shell,’
and in all the shells the remains of the yolk were seen. A remarkable
feature was that these remains of egg all vanished in a manner that
wholly baffled my investigations. The yellow yolk was too palpable to
become absorbed in the moss and sand; it could not have escaped notice.
With the greatest care I searched and examined every spray of moss,
every blade of grass, over and over again, but could discern no trace;
neither the skin nor any slimy glaire, nor one tinge of yolk, nor any
globulous collections of moisture whatever. Blackie did not eat them;
for she remained at the bottom of the box while the cares of maternity
were upon her, never moving. There was no possible doubt about her
being the mother of the brood. Her companions in captivity came to the
surface as usual during an hour or two of sunshine, and then retired
underground.</p>

<p>In removing the moss that first day to look for Blackie, I saw by an
enlargement at the lower part of the body that her family was still
increasing; and if such a creature <i>can</i> appeal, the look with which
she feebly raised her head as if to entreat not to be disturbed, was
one not to be disregarded. So I left her unmolested the whole day, and
indeed until she began to show herself and move about like the rest,
coming up if enticed by sunshine, and retiring early below, as they all
did daily.</p>

<p>I communicated this interesting event to Mr. Frank Buckland at the
time, and to the editor of a zoological<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_465" id="Page_465">[465]</a></span> journal, inviting both to
inspect the interesting family. I also sent a short account of the
November brood to <i>Land and Water</i>. Mr. Buckland was, I believe, absent
from town; and my MS. (now before me) was returned from <i>Land and
Water</i> for ‘want of space.’</p>

<p>Evidently the November brood were after all but sorry little
slow-worms, beneath the notice of scientific eyes, and unduly endowed
with imaginary importance in the estimation of their enthusiastic
guardian!</p>

<p>In my careful examination of the contents of the cage next day, in
order to ascertain the chance of yet other silvery shreds of life,
I observed a little dry, globular substance, which had a somewhat
suspicious look. It was firm to the touch, and on breaking it, showed
a veiny sort of conglomerate appearance, as of layers or convolutions.
Several of these hard, dry masses I afterwards found, all on being
broken presenting a similar appearance. Then it suddenly occurred to
me that they must be dried-up eggs of the other slow-worm, and that
she must have deposited them some time previously. The surface of sand
was easily accounted for by the frequent turning over and stirring up
of the soft rubbish in the cage. At first thinking only of Blackie,
and being satisfied that these singular little masses contained no
life, I threw them away; when, too late, resolving to keep some and
investigate their nature, only one more could be found; but this one
was preserved in spirits of wine, together with two or three of the
tiny slow-worms. The female that conjecturally laid them had frequently
got out of the box and sustained many falls to the floor; which, even
had other circumstances been propitious, might sufficiently account
for the destruction of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_466" id="Page_466">[466]</a></span> embryo life. But in addition to accidents were
the extremely cold and sunless summer and the ten weeks of disturbed
and comfortless existence; and then the green lizard was for ever
scrambling about and scratching the earth in all directions. He alone
was enough to make a conglomerate of the unmatured eggs.</p>

<p>The remaining one of the supposed eggs was put aside with other
specimens, and almost forgotten till the present time. Looking at it
now after it has been two years in the spirits of wine, I find the
sandy surface washed off and deposited as sediment, and in a partly
torn and ruptured membrane behold a perfect little <i>Anguis fragilis</i>
quite as big as those others which were hatched. Whether this happens
to be a more perfect embryo than those that were hardened, or whether
it has grown softer and more distinguishable through being in liquid,
it is impossible to say, except that here it is. There were, then,
<i>two broods</i>, as had been anticipated, and in both cases eight or
nine. The precise date of the hard eggs is not clear; probably they
were produced first. The warmth of the room at length did for Blackie
what the sun had failed to do; and even then her young ones were not
fully matured. The other one, through many vicissitudes, in common
with her big cousin Anaconda, produced bad eggs. Truly are not these
two&mdash;or say only one&mdash;is not Blackie’s case a verification of what the
author of <i>British Reptiles</i> affirmed of these slow-worms: ‘There is
no doubt that the duration of the period of gestation must depend on
the temperature to which the animal is exposed,’ even if this be not
another instance of retarded deposition.</p>

<p>A word more, in conclusion, about the tiny progeny.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_467" id="Page_467">[467]</a></span></p>

<p>To the touch having no more bone or substance than an earth-worm of
the same size, their ability to burrow seemed marvellous. When placed
in the sunshine&mdash;such as there was of it&mdash;they basked in apparent
satisfaction, retiring betimes and working themselves underground to
the depth of four or five inches. Often two or more were missing,
when every scrap of earth and moss had to be spread on a newspaper
and minutely separated to search for them. Indeed, I have never felt
certain whether the family originally consisted of eight, nine, or
ten, having a strong suspicion that their grown-up relatives or the
lizard had supposed them to be worms placed there for their express
delectation. And when, one day, the number was reduced to six, and the
green lizard looked unusually plump and impudent, the young fry were
quickly transferred to a separate home, a glass bowl, through which
they could be watched without molestation, and up which they could not
possibly crawl. The smallest of worms (the weather being warm again)
and a cockle-shell of water, the softest of sand and the prettiest of
mosses, ministered to their comfort; but though they grew very slightly
and their colour became more defined, I do not think they partook of
food or water during the whole six weeks that they were thus watched
and cared for. One from the first day was always livelier than the
rest. It was one of those that had been hatched first or possibly
born alive, being perfect, and with the navel closed when I had first
discovered it. Through the glass we could see them deep down in the
earth, and so close to the side that they could nearly always be easily
counted. Not at all sociable were the little ones, one here, another
there, as if getting as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_468" id="Page_468">[468]</a></span> far apart as their home permitted. In the
evening, if placed on the table near the lamp, they seemed to mistake
that for sunlight, and would come up and ramble restlessly about on the
surface for several hours. Their vitality was amazing.</p>

<p>One evening when showing them to a friend and permitting their antics
upon the table, one of them was suddenly and mysteriously missing. We
had carefully guarded the edge of the table; indeed, they were well in
the centre of it, and it seemed impossible for them to fall off. We
searched the carpet, notwithstanding, and with most careful scrutiny;
and finally deciding that the truant must have been replaced with some
moss unobserved, gave up the search.</p>

<p>Next morning, on entering the room, my maid thus greeted me: ‘Lor’,
Ma’am! if I didn’t find one of your little snakes down on the carpet
close to your chair, and for all the world I as near as possible
tramped on it. I put it in along with the others, and it worked its way
down in no time!’</p>

<p>Imagine that poor little shred of life passing the night in frantic
efforts to burrow into the carpet and retire below according to custom!
Whenever held or touched, their first impulse was to conceal themselves
beneath, and they would dive and butt with impetuous agitation in their
endeavours to push themselves out of sight.</p>

<p>The event in the family had caused me to postpone the hibernating
arrangements; so as long as the others ate (a thaw enabling us to dig
up worms again) and courted daylight, I kept them in the warm room. But
as will be remembered, very severe frost set in that winter (1879-80),
and no more worms could be dug up. While hibernating,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_469" id="Page_469">[469]</a></span> no pangs of
hunger could assail them; and though it cost me an effort to consign
those beautiful wee things to the cold and gloom of a temporary tomb,
yet it seemed the kindest thing to do under the circumstances; so, in
company with their unsympathizing mother and cousins, they were stowed
away in moss and darkness, but in a box instead of the jar. Well!&mdash;that
is all! My ignorance and its sad results were alluded to on p. 165. I
can only hope the poor little victims died insensible to their cruel
fate.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-158.jpg" width="200" height="216"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_470" id="Page_470">[470]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-041.jpg" width="500" height="101"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XXVI.</h2>

<p class="pch">‘<i>LIZZIE.</i>’</p>

<p class="drop-cap04">THIS tame slow-worm was promised a chapter to herself in my book, and I
trust my readers will not tire of her doings, but vouchsafe their kind
attention to an exhibition of still other feats in which the little
<i>Anguis fragilis</i> vies with the Great Anaconda.</p>

<p>In her maternal aspect we have done with her. The heroine of the
present chapter was for a much longer time in my possession than
‘Blackie’ and those other poor victims, and therefore tamer. When
my friends exclaimed, ‘Why on earth do you call that little snake
“Lizzie”?’ the simple reply was: ‘Because she is not a snake, but a
lizard.’ In what respects the slow-worm is a lizard my readers already
know; I will therefore describe what I hope may prove of zoological
interest. Already ‘Lizzie’ has ingratiated herself with the readers of
<i>Aunt Judy’s Magazine</i>,<a name="FNanchor_131_131" id="FNanchor_131_131"></a><a href="#Footnote_131_131" class="fnanchor">[131]</a> as also with her personal acquaintance for
her gentle and innocent manners.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_471" id="Page_471">[471]</a></span></p>

<p>First let us briefly review her many wrong names, ‘blindworm,’
‘slow-worm,’ ‘deaf-adder,’ ‘brittle-snake,’ and endeavour to account
for them. Of her name ‘snake’ (<i>Anguis</i>), from its external aspect,
enough has already been said. The ‘brittleness’ shared in common with
several of her foreign relatives, known as ‘glass snakes,’ proceeds
from a power of contracting the muscles into rigidity when molested:
that is, when, on finding themselves in a helpless condition,
slow-worms grasp firmly whatever they can attach themselves to. In
fact, this little snake only displays constricting powers as far as it
is able; for it really does constrict the fingers which detain it, with
a force as great for its size as its cousin Anaconda uses in killing
its prey. Were the giant constrictors to entwine us with proportionate
power, they would gain the day. In the case of <i>Anguis fragilis</i>, <i>we</i>
are the masters; and were we to attempt violently to unwind one from
our fingers, it would break ‘in halves’ in its resistance, or rather
in its redoubled efforts to cling the tighter and so save itself. May
it not in this respect, also, claim kinship with its giant rivals, and
show their common ancestry? On pp. 183 and 187 reference was made to
the ‘blindworm’ in connection with other ‘brittle’ snakes, and in the
use of their pointed tails. Our native ‘blindworm,’ in not having the
hard point at the end, has escaped the imputation of trying to ‘sting’
with that imaginary weapon, although it uses its tail with equal
and similar force, and for the same purpose. In handling the little
reptile, you will feel it pressing the tip of its tail against whatever
part comes in contact with it, as a hold, a fulcrum, and motive power.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_472" id="Page_472">[472]</a></span></p>

<div class="floatright">
     <img src="images/ill-472.jpg" width="200" height="662"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="cf"><p class="pc">Lizzie; never at a loss.</p>
</div></div>

<p>Upon a smooth surface it would be entirely helpless without this
assistant to progression, its scales being too even and polished to
afford hold of any kind. You will see it sweeping its long tail this
way and that, in search of some hold or obstacle against which to
push itself forward; and failing this, the point is pressed close to
the table or floor as may be. When in any unaccustomed position, as,
for instance, when held in the hand, you will see the tail instantly
twining itself about the fingers for safety, the creature trusting
itself entirely to its aid, and being helpless when its movements are
fettered in any way. If not strictly prehensile in the way of affording
support, as the tail of a true boa does, that of <i>Anguis fragilis</i> is
not far removed from it. Hold one that is accustomed to be handled
and in good health, and permit it to hang by the mere tip, as in the
accompanying illustration. So far from falling, the little creature
will at once draw itself upwards and backwards with perfect facility,
till it feels itself equally balanced, when the tail will be sent in
search of hold; it will cling quickly round a finger, and then <i>Anguis</i>
feels itself safe once more. My<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_473" id="Page_473">[473]</a></span> tame slow-worms accomplished this with
perfect ease whenever so suspended.</p>

<p>Others, unaccustomed to such a position, or in a not very robust
condition, must be treated cautiously under this experiment, and not
permitted to fall; but in every case the tail will be seen to be a
very important agent to the reptile. It is longer in the male than in
the female slow-worm&mdash;more than half the entire length in the former,
and less than half in the latter. The males are, therefore, longer on
the whole, though the body itself is longest in the female. Regard
should be had to this, when, roughly speaking, they are said to ‘break
themselves in <i>halves</i>;’ because it is not the body which breaks, but
only the tail, or a portion of it, in common with other lizards.</p>

<p>The power of the tail in this reptile was again seen when its home was
a bell-glass, such as is used for gold-fish. The one in which my first
family of slow-worms dwelt, was almost as high as their own length,
so that I considered them sufficiently secure without any cover to
it. But after a little while they effected an exit. <i>How</i>, was at
first a mystery, until I saw them perseveringly raising themselves in
a perpendicular direction against the side. Many a slip and many a
trial had they, but they rarely desisted until success crowned their
efforts. When their head had once gained the edge of the glass, they
easily drew themselves up and over it, and let themselves down on the
outside, as you would draw a cord over the edge. The perfect smoothness
of the glass, the nice balance required, and the gradual lowering of
themselves, rendered this proceeding still more astonishing; for as
the glass was on<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_474" id="Page_474">[474]</a></span> a stand there was a considerable distance between
the edge and the table. A slow-worm’s progression is truly marvellous.
In this little creature one can detect no action of the ribs; they are
too fine and too close. Its scaly armour, moreover, is smooth and firm;
and as for ventral scutæ to ‘afford hold,’ it has none. Yet with ease
it draws itself over that polished rim, as it draws itself up and over
your finger, when suspended by the mere tip of its tail.</p>

<p>Soon the slow-worms accomplished this feat so knowingly that it became
necessary to cover them over, which was done with gauze having a strong
elastic cord hemmed into it. They practised their climbing powers all
the same, and though not able to get over the edge, tried and pushed
hard enough to stretch the gauze considerably; so that, unless well
pulled down, it lay only loosely and bagging over the top.</p>

<p>Judge, then, of my amazement one day to find Lizzie <i>outside</i> the
glass, resting contentedly in the loose fold round the edge above the
elastic. The little creature had absolutely got over the edge, but the
tightness of the elastic baffling the outside descent, there it lay.</p>

<p>In <i>Nature</i>, vol. xx. p. 529, Mr. Hutchinson describes and illustrates
an exactly similar feat accomplished by a ‘little snake’ nine inches
long. It was put in a glass jar ten inches high, having also for a
cover a bit of coarse muslin secured by an elastic band. The reptile
was missing, the muslin and the band were intact, when, after a
mysterious surprise and search, the little snake was found under the
rim of the jar <i>inside</i> the muslin. The writer does not say what snake
it was, but he afterwards observed it ‘ascending easily,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_475" id="Page_475">[475]</a></span>’ standing
on the tip of its tail, and supporting itself against the side of the
jar by the abdominal scales creating a vacuum, ‘like the pedal scales
of a common house lizard;’ it was not a slow-worm, therefore. He felt
quite satisfied about this adaptation of the scutæ, a mode which, in
describing the larger snakes climbing up their glass cages, I called
‘compressure,’ p. 215. Mr. Hutchinson does not tell us, either, how
much earth or rubbish covered the floor of the jar, though there must
have been an inch or more, to enable a snake of nine inches to raise
its head over a ledge ten inches high. Lizzie not having ventral scales
to help her, used her tail only as a support, then nicely maintaining
the perpendicular. Many times she failed in achieving success, but she
did achieve it, and grew so enterprising in consequence that I shall
now confine my story to her. At first she lived in a box, the top of
which she could easily look over, and she was occasionally permitted
to get out and ramble among some ferns on the same table. Sometimes
this box was also covered with a muslin, having elastic hemmed into it,
and she soon discovered that this with persevering attempts could be
raised. The use of the tail was here remarkable. With it she maintained
her ‘stand,’ so to speak, while with her head and the forepart of her
body she tried to loosen the net; using persistent and powerful efforts
to lift it, by repeatedly tossing back her head. She acted in every
way as if determined not to be baffled, and with an apparent intention
or reflection that was, without doubt, the result of experience. In
higher creatures this application of force to produce a certain result
would be pronounced ‘intelligence.’ In the little slow-worm<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_476" id="Page_476">[476]</a></span> there was
undeniably a perception of cause and effect. On one occasion when she
had got her tail on the edge of the box, and her whole length in the
stretched muslin along the top, she so far succeeded with the forcible
action of the head that she worked the very strong and tight elastic
up, but not at all to her own satisfaction; for it instantly contracted
under her, bagging her most effectually. She was caught in a trap of
her own construction.</p>

<p>Seeing her so wonderfully energetic, and by no means ‘slow,’ either in
action or intelligence, the next thing was to ascertain whether Lizzie
was ‘deaf’ in addition to her other pseudo-failings; but by the various
tests used to exercise her aural faculties, I am inclined to think her
powers of hearing served her almost better than those of sight. When
permitted to ramble among the plants and over the table, the <i>sound</i>
much more than the <i>sight</i> of her box and its contents attracted her.
Never averse to go home and retreat into her moss, the rustling of this
or the scraping and rubbing the sides of the box&mdash;any <i>noise</i> with it
with which she was familiar, would cause her to turn towards it, when
the sight of it alone failed to entice her. After a time she turned
her head, if even from across the room I made a sudden and sharp noise
to attract her attention,&mdash;such as the tapping of a spoon against a
cup, or the peculiar talk I indulged in for educational purposes. She
undoubtedly became familiar with certain sounds, which were repeated
till she did look round. Not&mdash;as I am bound to confess&mdash;that it was a
strikingly intelligent look! rather the contrary, I fear: still, as the
object was to test her powers of hearing, the result was satisfactory.
The origin<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_477" id="Page_477">[477]</a></span> of this reputed deafness is difficult to conjecture. In
the way of external ears, those of the slow-worm are less distinct
than those of lizards generally, but more so than in snakes, which
have no visible aural apertures; whereas in the slow-worms they can be
discerned if sought for, though they are very small and indistinct.</p>

<p>Not much less perplexing is the supposititious ‘blindness’ of
the slow-worm. This must have had its origin in days long before
‘gentle-folk’ took rural walks for the purpose of observing natural
objects; long before Shakspeare’s time, and when slow-worms were far
more numerous than now. Probably those who saw most of them were the
peasantry, and that in winter time, when, in their out-door work, they
would discover a number hibernating. A score or two of slow-worms in
company with a few snakes and adders brought to light in turning up
stones or earth, would attract the rustics, when a stray one in summer
time would pass unnoticed or, at any rate, unexamined. Though the
larger reptiles would be equally torpid, their eyes would show all the
same, while the slow-worm’s eyes would be so tightly closed that their
place could hardly be found. Thus they were presumably ‘blind.’ This
is mere conjecture in seeking a reason, but ‘blind worms’ they were in
England long before the <i>typhlops</i> (p. 187) of the tropics was known,
and long before any other ‘naturalist’ than Topsell and his like wrote
upon ‘Serpentes’ and the <i>Amphisbæna Europæa</i>.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_478" id="Page_478">[478]</a></span></p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-478.jpg" width="300" height="90"
         alt=""
         title="" />
     <div class="caption"><p class="pc">Lizzie in a knot.</p>
</div></div>

<p>Topsell, by the way, whom we quoted on the subject of tongues, thought
he knew all about slow-worms, and gave them credit for a length and
power of tail far exceeding those of the present day. ‘They have been
seen to suck a Cow, for then they twist their Tailes about the Cowe’s
Legges. The Slow-worm biteth mortallie, and the Cow dyeth!’ Consistent
this with the ‘Blind-worm’s sting’ of the poet of that day. Of the six
or seven that have been in my keeping at one time or another, not one
has, under any provocation, attempted to bite me. They were handled
continually, twirled about, and tied into knots (with gentle treatment,
of course), but not one of them ever broke itself in ‘halves’ or opened
its mouth with malice intent. Lizzie sometimes in winding about my
fingers got herself into very pretty knots, and in such tied-up fashion
when placed on the table she would remain motionless for a time, and
then begin to move away. Curious was the effect at this juncture. The
knot was not loosened at all; but as the little reptile began to move,
the knot passed downwards, and she crawled out of it, while its form
remained the same to the very end of the tail. It was similar to what
we saw when the little four-rayed snakes constricted their birds;
the form of their coils altering no more than would a slide passed
along a rope. Neither did such a knot disturb Lizzie. She appeared
quite unconscious of it, and simply crawled out of it. Perhaps any
‘brittleness’ discoverable may have been from rough handling, as one
can easily suppose a too abrupt untwining of the reptile when clinging
round the fingers would so alarm it that it would cling the tighter.
A gentleman<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_479" id="Page_479">[479]</a></span> assured me that he had seen one break in ‘halves,’ and
the two portions lying on the table. Not being a scientific observer,
he could not describe the appearance of the fractured part, except
that they seemed to contract; and this is what I have observed in the
tail of lizards when accidentally abridged. The owners do not appear,
however, to concern themselves about it.</p>

<p>The name ‘worm’ given to this little reptile is merely as a creeping
thing, a ‘worm of the earth,’ in common with many other small crawling
creatures which are not earth-<i>worms</i>. Its quality of ‘slowness’ is
only another name for caution. Quick and active it can be; but in
retreating down among the moss or hay, or whatever you provide in its
cage, then you see the perfection of slowness. Not a blade stirs, not a
sound is heard, and one may repeat here that the manner of progression
in <i>Anguis fragilis</i> is not the least of all the ophidian wonders we
have witnessed. In the earth it can burrow itself to the depth of
several feet. In soft rubbish it simply vanishes slowly; its hard,
polished scales permitting it, as it were, to slide down into and among
the hay with that gently gliding motion which enables us to perceive
how very well it does manage without the ancestral limbs.</p>

<p>One other name it has, ‘adder,’ which, perhaps from association with
the true adder or viper, has gained it its evil character of being
venomous.</p>

<p>But this word ‘adder,’ like ‘worm,’ was formerly used for many creeping
things, and is derived from old Saxon and Danish words <i>atter</i>,
<i>eddre</i>, <i>ætter</i>, etc., and the German <i>natter</i>, which has a similar
signification, any low-lying or crawling creature. Even in this
nineteenth century the ‘slow-worm<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_480" id="Page_480">[480]</a></span>’ still bears an evil character in
some rural districts, and in Wales more particularly.</p>

<p>A few weeks ago, a Welsh lady, hearing me speak of my tame slow-worms,
asked if I were not afraid to handle them.</p>

<p>‘Why?’ one naturally asked.</p>

<p>‘Because they are so poisonous,’ she replied.</p>

<p>I explained that this erroneous idea had probably originated in the
little creature being sometimes called an ‘adder,’ and so forth.</p>

<p>My friend did not take the explanation kindly, but rather resented the
possibility of her being mistaken. ‘They are so very common in Wales,’
she said, ‘and I am sure they are venomous there.’</p>

<p>Another lady of the company, subsequently speaking of this, remarked,
‘I should certainly be inclined to believe what Miss F. says about them
(the slow-worms), because she lives so much in the country and is such
an observer.’</p>

<p>This speaker was a lady of really superior intellectual attainments;
but she had never attempted to overcome a strong prejudice against
anything in the shape of a snake. She would not <i>permit</i> herself to be
convinced that any of them were either harmless, clean, or beautiful;
but, like the monks who would not look through Galileo’s telescope, for
fear of seeing what it was heresy to believe, my friend preferred to
hug her prejudices!</p>

<p>One little bit more of gossip in taking leave of Lizzie. The party
were young gentlemen, all of them of studious and intellectual tastes
and good position. ‘How <i>could</i> I endure to touch those horrible slimy
snakes?’ one of them<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_481" id="Page_481">[481]</a></span> exclaimed, on hearing a lady inquire about my
pets. I assured him they were as clean and dry as the ruler on the
table. The young gentlemen exchanged dubious glances, and nearly all of
them attributed to my undue partiality the assurance that they were not
‘slimy.’ ‘I always thought they were,&mdash;didn’t <i>you</i>?’ they said to each
other.</p>

<p>A word must be added on the subject of skin-shedding in the slow-worms,
various processes having been described; as that it is ‘always shed in
pieces,’ ‘always splits on the head first,’ etc. As no two of my pets
doffed their coats at regular periods, or precisely in the same manner,
I judged that, as in snakes, the sloughing depended principally on
the health of the individual, or the temperature. They all invariably
began at the lips, rubbing their heads till the skin separated round
the mouth exactly as snakes do, and then crawled out of it. In one
case the skin was shed <i>unreversed</i> throughout the entire length. This
was pushed off and left behind in a crumpled form, but in picking it
up it extended uninjured to its original length, perfect from mouth
to tail. Others were reversed as far as the tail, which slipped out
‘like a sword out of its scabbard,’ as described by Mr. Bell; others
were reversed throughout the length. Sometimes they were in pieces, and
this was, I think, attributable to insufficient moisture. One did not
change after August; others changed several times during the summer; so
that there appears to be the same sort of caprice, or more probably of
unascertained causes for variable processes, in casting the cuticle as
in snakes.</p>

<p>‘Lizzie’s’ bibulous propensities were mentioned p. 89.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_482" id="Page_482">[482]</a></span> In vain was she
tempted with milk, but water appeared to be almost more necessary than
food; at least, after being deprived of both, she took that first and
eagerly.</p>

<p>So much has been said of the burrowing habits of the slow-worms, that
I must mention a remarkable exception. Never did I see mine <i>ascend</i>,
except when attempting to escape; nor, when placed among the plants on
a flower-stand, did they ever <i>raise</i> their head, but would work their
way downwards, clinging and holding on by their tail till they reached
the floor. Always <i>down</i> was their instinct, even down the stairs on
several occasions; never up. But since the completion of this chapter,
some slow-worms have been deposited at the Zoological Gardens that
evince a climbing tendency; and this strikes me as being so novel a
feat that I add a line. The little creatures&mdash;one of which is of a pale
flesh-colour, almost white&mdash;live in a cage with some tree frogs, behind
the door on entering the Reptilium. Here they are, May 1882, often seen
lodged in the branches of the shrub, and reposing there at ease, as if
in quiet enjoyment. The ‘white’ one I first observed in the tree, and
subsequently others. So frequently may they be seen reposing in this
way among the leaves, that to climb seems to have become a confirmed
habit or taste; and in concluding the history of <i>Anguis fragilis</i>, I
record this singular diversity of habit as one other strong feature in
common with the giant Anaconda.</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_483" id="Page_483">[483]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-059.jpg" width="500" height="110"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XXVII.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>DO SNAKES AFFORD A REFUGE TO THEIR YOUNG?</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap04">THE question, ‘Do vipers swallow their young in times of danger?’ is
one less easy to solve to the satisfaction of the unbelievers than
some of the preceding inquiries, because the proof demanded is an
almost unattainable one. ‘Bring me a viper with its mouth tied up,
and all her young ones in her <i>throat</i>, and then I will believe you,’
say the sceptics. Now, in the first place, a man does not go hedging
and ditching, or to reap corn, nor does a gentleman go to his field
sports, or for a country stroll, ready provided with a cord and a bag
and an assistant for the express purpose of capturing maternal vipers,
who at sight of him receive all their little ones into their mouths;
and, in the second place, if he did so, making it the one business of
his walk to seek for and entrap such vipers, he might spend a great
many summers in the search before his trouble was rewarded. Even were
he so fortunate, it is doubtful whether he would be believed by all
persons; for viper-swallowing, like ‘the Great Sea Serpent,’ has been
a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_484" id="Page_484">[484]</a></span> subject so contemptuously dismissed that investigation is arrested,
and few in England would now risk their reputation by committing their
names to print in connection with it. It is much to be regretted that
this has of late years been the case with several English publications
whose columns should be open to a fair examination of evidence on
all zoological questions. The influence of such journals, therefore,
checks progress; for until prejudice is got rid of, there can be no
advancement in any science.</p>

<p>As is well known, the late Mr. Frank Buckland was to the last sceptical
on this question. His specialty was not ophiology; but the mass of
readers do not stop to inquire about this; and he, being a popular
writer as well as a popular character, was accredited by thousands who
quoted him, while themselves no naturalists, nor in any position to
form an independent opinion. Some contemporary journals unfortunately
display the same prejudices, even at the time of writing, causing
zoological publications, which should embrace every branch of biology,
to be devoted almost exclusively to the specialties of an editor.</p>

<p>Happily this scepticism is not universal. In the American publications
devoted to zoology, information in every branch is welcomed as worthy
of consideration; and though truth has often to be sifted out from a
very gigantic pile of rubbish, still it is worth the search; and we
can but feel that the rapid advance of our Transatlantic relatives in
every branch of science is due, in a great measure, to the dismissal of
prejudice and to the encouragement of every new idea.</p>

<p>So far as snakes are concerned, their field is wide, it is true. In
England our observations are limited to our one<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_485" id="Page_485">[485]</a></span> viper, whereas America
is the land of snakes, no less than are India and Australia; and while
our native viper is growing rarer every year, the opportunities for
observation in the Western World are wherever a new settlement is
planted.</p>

<p>Thus, when, in February 1873, Professor G. Browne Goode, of Middletown
University, Connecticut, invited, through the columns of the <i>American
Agriculturist</i>, all the authentic information that could be procured on
the question, ‘Do snakes swallow their young?’ he received, as he tells
us, no less than 120 testimonies from as many persons in various parts
of the United States that single season.</p>

<p>The area in which information was collected included twenty-four States
and counties, ‘almost all the evidence being valuable.’</p>

<p>Professor Goode was intending to bring the subject before the <i>American
Association for the Advancement of Science</i>, to convene at Portland,
Maine, the following August; and he spent the summer in collecting
information.</p>

<p>At that session of 1873, in the Biological Section of the Association,
‘A Science Convention on Snakes’ was held, and a paper was read
by Professor G. Browne Goode, the subject offered for discussion
being&mdash;‘<i>Do snakes offer a temporary refuge for their young in their
throats, whence they emerge when the danger is past?</i>’ On this occasion
the chair was occupied by Mr. F. W. Putnam, one of the editors of the
<i>American Naturalist</i>, and secretary to the Association. Professor
Joseph Lovering was the new President on Professor Lawrence Smith’s
retiring; and among those who took part in the discussion were several
eminent naturalists<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_486" id="Page_486">[486]</a></span> New York and other journals published reports of
the Convention at the time; and the entire paper by Professor Goode was
given to the world in the Annual Reports of the <i>American Association</i>.</p>

<p>From these I will condense the principal matter, quoting also from a
paper on the same subject written by F. W. Putnam in vol. ii. of the
<i>American Naturalist</i> for 1869. Indeed, the two accounts are so blended
that I can only recommend both to the perusal of the interested reader,
Professor Goode having reproduced much from Putnam’s paper in the
<i>American Naturalist</i>, which, as he informs us, was the first that led
him to take an interest in the subject.</p>

<p>He began by reminding his audience that it had long been a popular
belief that the young of certain snakes seek a temporary protection
from danger by gliding down the open throat of the mother, though it
had been of late doubted by so many naturalists as to be classed among
the superstitions; but that now a summing up of the evidence would show
conclusively that the popular idea is sustained by facts.</p>

<p>The traditions of the North American Indians show that the belief has
prevailed with them from prehistoric times. In England also, as he
reminded us, as early as the sixteenth century, allusions to it are
found in Spencer’s <i>Faerie Queene</i>, 1590, Canto I. vv. 14, 15, 22, 25.
From this a word or two only need be quoted regarding the</p>

<p class="pp10 p1">‘Half serpent, half woman,’</p>

<p class="pn1">with</p>

<p class="pp6s p1">‘One thousand young ones sucking upon her poison dugs,’</p>

<p class="pn1">when she is disturbed in her dark cave:</p>

<p class="pp6s p1">‘Soon as that uncouth light upon them shone,<br />
Into her mouth they crept, and suddaine all were gone.’</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_487" id="Page_487">[487]</a></span></p>

<p class="p1">Again, in Sir Thomas Browne’s <i>Pseudoxia</i>, or ‘Vulgar Errours,
published in 1672, we find: ‘For the young ones will upon any fright,
for protection run into the belly of the Dam. For then the old one
receives them into her mouth, which way, the fright being passed, they
will returne againe; which is a peculiar way of refuge.’</p>

<p>He quotes from the <i>Humorous Lieutenant</i> of Beaumont and Fletcher the
words, ‘This is the old viper, and all the young ones creep every night
into her belly.’</p>

<p>The Professor also mentioned the American traveller, Mr. Jonathan
Carver, who, towards the end of the last century, recorded that he had
seen a large brood of young rattlesnakes retire for safety into the
throat of the parent, which he killed, when no less than seventy young
ones made their escape. Practical experience demands, How had he time
to reckon up these active, wriggling, tangled fugitives? Nevertheless
his story found favour and has been subsequently recited as probable.
Chateaubriand believed the fact, and glowingly expatiates on the
‘Superb Reptile which presents to man a pattern of tenderness.’ ...
‘When her offspring are pursued, she receives them into her mouth:
dissatisfied with every other place of concealment, she hides them
within herself, concluding that no asylum can be safer for her progeny
than the bosom of a mother. A perfect example of sublime love, she
refuses to survive the loss of her young, for it is impossible to
deprive her of them without tearing out her entrails.’ Elsewhere, with
less of admiration for the exemplary <i>crotalus</i>, Chateaubriand says,
‘By a singular faculty the female can introduce into her body the
little monsters to which she has given birth.’</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_488" id="Page_488">[488]</a></span></p>

<p>One of the early writers who witnessed this offer of refuge was M. de
Beauvoir, who saw a disturbed rattlesnake open her jaws to receive five
young ones. This amazed spectator retired to quietly watch the result,
when, after the lapse of some minutes, the mother snake recovered
confidence, and she again opened her mouth and ‘discharged’ her little
family. Professor Palisot de Beauvoir was an eminent French naturalist
of the beginning of this century, and the author of <i>Observations sur
les serpents</i>, published in <i>Daudin’s Histoire naturelle</i>, Paris,
1803. He was accepted as an authority on many other points of natural
history; and it is not improbable that he influenced Cuvier’s belief in
the ophidian maternal refuge.</p>

<p>It certainly does seem incredible that an occurrence so unprecedented
should have been conceived of in the first instance without some ocular
demonstration of it.</p>

<p>Another American traveller, whose testimony Professor Goode considered
of worth, was St. John Dunn Hunter,<a name="FNanchor_132_132" id="FNanchor_132_132"></a><a href="#Footnote_132_132" class="fnanchor">[132]</a> who saw young ones rush into
the rattlesnake’s mouth, and reappear when ‘the parent gave a sort of
contractile motion of the throat as a sign that danger was past.’</p>

<p>Coming down to our own times, Professor Goode mentioned Dr. Edward
Palmer, of the Smithsonian Institute of Washington, a well-known
traveller and collector, who in Paraguay saw seven young <i>crotali</i>
run into their mother’s mouth. After the snake was killed, they all
ran out. The parent and her brood are now in the National Museum at
Washington, D.C. Similar occurrences were witnessed by Professor
Sydney J. Smith, of Yale College; the Rev.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_489" id="Page_489">[489]</a></span> Chauncey Loomis, M.D.,
of Middletown University; Dr. D. L. Phares; Mr. Thomas Meham of
Philadelphia; a member of the Convention then present; and other
‘gentlemen whose statements as naturalists were not to be doubted.’
‘Due weight should be given to the wide distribution of the witnesses
and the remarkable concurrence of their statements,’ said the speaker.</p>

<p>Professors Wyman and Gill, and other physiologists then present, showed
that there is no physical reason why young snakes should not remain
for a time in the body of the mother. The gastric juice acts slowly
on living tissues, and as for respiration, it is almost impossible to
smother reptiles. ‘Snakes can live for a long time immersed in water,
and even in bottles hermetically sealed, and why not in a place of
refuge?’ argued Mr. Putnam. Instances were given of frogs escaping
from the stomach of snakes; also of other snakes swallowed by a larger
species returning to the light of day.</p>

<p>As a habit, if the swallowing ‘is not protective there is no parallel;
if protective, a similar habit is seen in some fishes of the South
American waters, of the genera <i>Arius</i>, <i>Bagrus</i>, and <i>Geophagus</i>,
where the males carry the eggs for safety in their mouths and gill
openings.’ Mr. Putnam instanced the Pipe-fish (<i>Syngnathus Peckianus</i>),
whose young when in an aquarium have been seen to go in and out of the
pouch of the male fish; and that a belief prevails among some sailors
that young sharks which suddenly disappear have gone into the mouth of
the mother. Some South American fishes carry their eggs in their mouth,
and why should there not exist an equally motherly regard on the part
of snakes?</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_490" id="Page_490">[490]</a></span></p>

<p>Mr. F. W. Putnam, secretary to the Association, had made himself
acquainted with all the English ‘viper-swallowing’ literature of
any importance up to the date of his paper on the subject in the
<i>American Naturalist</i>, 1869. Previous to that date, <i>Science Gossip</i>,
the <i>Field</i>, the <i>Zoologist</i>, and other English journals had devoted
more space to the subject than subsequently; and from these Mr.
Putnam cited many records from intelligent observers, in proof ‘that
snakes <i>do afford refuge to their young</i>.’ Of especial importance,
as corroborative evidence, were the statements and anatomical
investigations of Dr. Edwardes Crispe, F.Z.S., etc., who had for a long
while been studying the physiological possibility of such a retreat.
On the question, Would not the young snakes be rapidly digested in the
stomach of the parent? this anatomist showed that they would not come
in contact with the gastric juice at all, and that there is ample room
in the expansile œsophagus to receive them. He had made experiments
with various snakes by filling the stomach with water, in order to
ascertain its capacity in bulk. In 1855, Dr. E. Crispe had read a paper
on this subject at one of the meetings of the Zoological Society, and
again in 1862, when his previous opinions had become confirmed. He
had ‘positive evidence enabling him to state with certainty that the
English viper and some other venomous snakes do swallow their young at
an early period.’</p>

<p>Towards the end of the last century, Gilbert White, in his <i>History of
Selborne</i>, refers to the prevalent theory, and the instances recorded
by him are by the earlier editors of his works regarded rather as
evidence than the contrary. In<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_491" id="Page_491">[491]</a></span> the edition of 1851, the editor Jesse,
himself a naturalist, took pains to ascertain facts concerning vipers,
and he believed in the evidence given him. He had found vipers in their
mother’s ‘stomach’ (he does not say oviduct) ‘of a much larger size
(seven inches) than they would be when first excluded.’</p>

<p>(In the later editions of the <i>History of Selborne</i>, it is much to be
regretted that doubts are again thrown on the subject; and this in face
of the opinions of men of eminence, who had written from observation,
and had physiologically shown the possibility of such a refuge.)</p>

<p>Mr. Putnam also quoted Mr. M. C. Cooke, the author of <i>Our Reptiles</i>,
and at that time editor of <i>Science Gossip</i>. Here is a herpetologist
well able to form an unbiassed opinion, and who in his work says on
this question: ‘Men of science and repute, clergymen, naturalists, in
common with those who make no profession of learning, have combined in
this belief. Add to these, gentlemen whose statements in other branches
of natural history would not be doubted.’ Among them were Henry
Doubleday, Esq. of Epping, a well-known entomologist; the Rev. H. Bond,
of South Pellerton, Somerset; T. H. Gurney, of Calton Hall, Norwich,
a well-known ornithologist; and several others of similar scientific
standing.</p>

<p>Curiously, no one appears to doubt a similar maternal instinct as
displayed in our little native lizard, <i>Zootica vivipara</i>! Mr.
Doubleday related the case of one being accidentally trodden upon,
when three young ones ran out of her mouth. It was immediately killed
and opened, and two others that had been too much injured by the foot
to make<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_492" id="Page_492">[492]</a></span> their escape were still within the parent. At the time when
a controversy on the viper question was going on, Mr. Edward Newman
edited the <i>Zoologist</i>, and he himself related a most confirmatory case
of this viviparous lizard. A gentleman who was collecting, caught one
with two young ones; all three were consigned to his pocket <i>vasculum</i>.
On reaching home the two young ones had disappeared, and the mother
looked in such goodly condition that he thought she must have made a
meal of her offspring. Next morning, behold! there were the two little
ones and their devoted parent all safe and sound. She had sheltered
them within her body! And, as Mr. Newman added, ‘the narrators are of
that class who do know what to observe and how to observe it.’</p>

<p>In May 1865 a clergyman in Norfolk communicated to <i>Science Gossip</i>
that he had seen six or seven young vipers run helter-skelter down
their mother’s throat. He killed the parent and ‘out came the little
ones.’ In July another correspondent of the same paper saw several
young vipers vanish in a like manner, adding, ‘By the way the mother
opened her mouth to receive them, he would say they were accustomed to
that sort of thing.’ Mr. J. H. Gurney recorded that a viper with young
ones was disturbed, when two of the latter ran into her open mouth, the
second one after getting half in wriggling out again. The viper was
cut open to seek a reason for this, when a recently swallowed mouse
was found stopping up the way. The first had managed to get into safe
quarters, but the second could not pass.</p>

<p>In Oct. 1866 the question was revived by Mr. Thomas<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_493" id="Page_493">[493]</a></span> Rider, who wrote
to the <i>Field</i> newspaper that on September 21st he had seen a number of
little vipers about three inches long run down their mother’s throat.
His account was followed by a number of letters from various persons,
who very lamely tried to convince him that his eyes had deceived him;
that what he had seen was the wriggling tongue, and a good deal more
of such feeble talk, which Mr. Rider took in gentlemanly good-humour.
He further described that at first he clearly saw the young ones <i>at
a distance</i> from the parent; that, the latter being killed, the young
were found <i>within</i> her; that in carrying her, two of them had <i>fallen
out of her mouth</i>; that he felt quite sure that what he stated was
correct. His description was so graphic and evidently truthful that
the distinguished naturalist Thomas Bell wrote also to the <i>Field</i> to
express his great satisfaction at so authentic an account, confirming
his own previous impressions. ‘I did not doubt the fact before,’ he
said, in the <i>Field</i> of October 27th, 1866, ‘but such an attestation as
this from such an authority’ (an educated country gentleman) ‘must be
considered as settling the question.’</p>

<p>For the next few weeks in the Natural History columns of the <i>Field</i>
a number of letters from various persons appeared, the majority
taking up the cudgels to resent the insult offered to Mr. Rider and
the eminent herpetologist Thomas Bell, F.L.S., F.R.S., and one of the
Council of the Zoological Society; and to quote still other cases of
viper-swallowing. ‘Only a purblind, stupid person,’ wrote one of them,
‘could possibly mistake young vipers for a tongue.’</p>

<p>J. Scott Hayward, Esq. of Folkington, Sussex, wrote that three of his
men while haymaking found a viper, and one of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_494" id="Page_494">[494]</a></span> them crushed its head
with his boot. A young viper ‘scrabbled’ about his boot after its
mother. They then cut off the viper’s head, and seven young vipers
crawled out at the neck. The other had been too late, but was evidently
trying to follow the rest. There was no possibility of mistaking
seven little vipers for one hair-like tongue in this case; but a man
‘convinced against his will,’ etc., and therefore the editor again
abruptly closed the subject.</p>

<p>Of the hundred or more instances occurring in America, and now
presented to the assembly, those considered of especial interest
were published in the Reports of the Association; and after some
further discussion Professor Gill said that he considered the evidence
sufficient to finally decide the matter. ‘Since many important facts in
biology are accepted on the statements of one single observer, these
testimonies are claimed to be sufficient to set the matter for ever at
rest.’</p>

<p>This was the conclusion arrived at by the members of the American
‘Science Convention on Snakes,’ in 1873.</p>

<p>Of the witnesses introduced on that occasion, Professor Goode dismissed
those who had only <i>found</i> the young snakes within the parent, but had
not <i>seen</i> them enter. ‘Let us not trust to untrained observations,’
he said; those whose testimony was accepted being, in addition to the
well-known men already mentioned&mdash;‘an intelligent class of farmers,
planters, and business men, intelligent readers of an agricultural
magazine.’ ... ‘The well-attested cases included many non-venomous
species, the habit probably extending to <i>all those which are known
as oviparous</i>, as well as the <i>Crotalidæ</i>. The examples embraced the
garter snake,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_495" id="Page_495">[495]</a></span> <i>Eutania sirtalis</i> and <i>E. saurita</i>; the water snake,
<i>Tropidonotus sipedon</i>; the rattlesnake, <i>Caudisona horridus</i>; the
copper-head and moccasin, <i>Ancistrodon contortrix</i> and <i>piscivorus</i>;
the “<i>Massasauga</i>,” <i>Crotalus tergiminus</i>; the English viper, <i>Pelias
berus</i>; and the mountain black snake, <i>Coluber Alleghaniensis</i>.
Probably all the <i>Crotalidæ</i> might be included. It remains to be shown
whether the habit extends to the egg-laying snakes, but as yet no
proof had occurred. The Professors then present invited still further
observations and reports, affirming that the breeding habits of more
than twenty-five of the North American genera were entirely unknown.’</p>

<p>The following are a few of the cases recorded.</p>

<p>A ‘water moccasin’ (probably <i>Ancistrodon piscivorus</i>) had been seen
for several days unwelcomely close to a southern residence. A gentleman
wishing to entice her away from the water so as the better to kill her,
had a rabbit placed near, which by and by she seized and had nearly
swallowed, when those on the watch made a noise to alarm her. She
quickly disgorged it, gave a shrill whistling noise, and five young
snakes ran from under a log down her throat. The men cut off her head
and found the five young which tried to get away.</p>

<p>‘A farmer who was mowing saw a number of little snakes and a large
one. He went a short distance to fetch a fork to kill them, and on his
return found only the large one left. He struck it on the back, and
seven ran out of her mouth.’</p>

<p>‘Another farmer saw a “striped snake,” and noticed a number of young
ones near to her head. He alarmed them, and the young ones rushed in
at her open mouth. He<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_496" id="Page_496">[496]</a></span> stepped back and watched to see what next would
happen, when presently some of them came out. He killed the mother, and
all the rest ran out.’</p>

<p>A gentleman in Ohio saw a water snake on a bank. He got a pole, and
with one stroke of it wounded her, but not so much as to disable her.
She instantly made for the water, swam about her own length, when
she ‘wheeled round’ with difficulty, and placing her under jaw just
above the level of the water, opened her mouth wide, when some ten
or twelve young snakes ran or swam down her throat; after which she
went in search of a hiding-place. She was, however, killed and opened,
and ‘about twenty’ living young snakes were found within her, ‘two or
three of which were seven or eight inches long.’ Out of the 120 cases
recorded, sixty-seven of the witnesses saw and described the actions
so distinctly as to leave no doubt in the minds of their hearers; and
of these, twenty-two heard the parents’ signal ‘whistle,’ or hiss, or
click, or rattles, according to the species observed.</p>

<p>A man Charles Smith was ploughing near Chicago, when his plough caught
and turned over a large flat stone (‘rock,’ as they call it there),
exposing a very large rattlesnake and her young ones. The mother
rattled the alarm, and all the young ones ran down her throat. Smith
killed the old one, and immediately the young ones began to crawl back
from her mouth and were killed by him. Thirteen of them were five or
six inches long.</p>

<p>Some of the witnesses, after killing the snake into which they had seen
the young ones retire, saw them shaken out again by dogs which had
seized the mother. A few of the observers went on several successive
days to watch a certain<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_497" id="Page_497">[497]</a></span> snake that was known to have a nest close by;
and on each occasion when alarmed, the young ran into the parent’s
mouth.</p>

<p>Mr. Putnam also mentioned a ‘striped snake’ (which he had considered
ovoviviparous) bringing forth live young ones at the end of August; she
‘having been a long while in confinement.’ (This was no doubt a case of
retarded functions.)</p>

<p>In vol. iii. of the <i>American Naturalist</i>, 1870, an interesting record
of the ‘blowing snake’ (<i>Heterodon platyrhinos</i>) appears. One of
these snakes had been wounded in her side, and over one hundred young
ones from 6 to 8 inches long came forth from the wound. They were
all active, all blowing and flattening their bodies like thoroughly
wide-awake <i>Heterodons</i>. Sixty-three of them being uninjured died in
alcohol, thirteen were much lacerated, as was the mother, and the rest
escaped. Says the narrator, ‘We <i>know</i> that this snake is oviparous.
Had she swallowed them, or can she be also ovoviviparous?’ (Well, she
might be either or both as occasion demanded!) This is one of those
examples which might have given rise to the supposition handed down by
Aristotle, and explained p. 431.</p>

<p>One hundred snakelings from 6 to 8 inches long seems almost incredible
from the space they would occupy. Yet in bulk they would not be more
than one large snake which the mother could easily swallow. The
accommodating ribs render such habits more feasible than at first sight
would appear. <i>Heterodon platyrhinos</i> is a wonderfully prolific snake.
In the <i>Zoological Society Proceedings</i>, vol. vi. 1869, S. S. Ruthven
states that he has observed it to bring forth over one hundred <i>live</i>
young at a time.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_498" id="Page_498">[498]</a></span></p>

<p>One more example shall be added, of what Professor Goode considered a
remarkable instance of hereditary instinct. In a hay-field was found
a nest of eggs, one of which was cut open, when a small but perfectly
formed ‘milk adder’ within immediately assumed a menacing attitude
and ‘brandished’ its tongue. Some of the other eggs were then torn
open, the young in which acted in a similar manner. Then the old snake
appeared, and after endeavours to encourage this unexpected family,
put her head on a level with the ground and opened her mouth, when the
young ones vanished down her throat.</p>

<p>It is worthy of notice that in many of the above cases the mother
snake made a signal noise, that the young ones understood this
signal, and that she opened her mouth in a manner which they readily
comprehended. ‘This concurrence of testimony is not to be disregarded,’
says Professor Goode. And the reader will admit the force of these
evidences. Those witnesses, dispersed over thousands of square miles,
had entered into no compact to make their accounts agree; nor did one
spectator in Kansas know what another in New Jersey was looking at or
writing about.</p>

<p>After such a weight of evidence, and in face of the decision arrived
at by the American Convention, it is greatly to be lamented that
the <i>Field</i>, so far from advancing like our American friends, now
retrogrades on this question. So lately as October 1881, when another
case was cited of the maternal refuge, the Editor closes his columns
against investigation; and refuses to be convinced unless he were to
see ‘the young vipers at the Zoological Gardens obligingly run in
and out of their mothers’ mouths,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_499" id="Page_499">[499]</a></span>’ which is a performance we are
never likely to witness. For, in the first place, the young are often
produced in mid-day, in the presence of the crowd of visitors. Thus,
from their birth accustomed to publicity, they have not the motive as
when in their native haunts they are suddenly alarmed at the first
sight of an apparition in human form. And in the second place, the
young are generally removed at once into a separate cage, and they lose
all knowledge of their mother. Both mother and progeny are familiar
with humanity; and the former is much more likely at the sight of the
keeper to open her mouth for a mouse than to invite her children to
enter therein.</p>

<p>In the foregoing portions of this volume I have been able frequently
to bring personal observations to verify what books have taught me.
With the present subject this cannot be the case. I have neither seen a
viper in the act of giving refuge to her young ones by receiving them
into her mouth, nor have I ever had the circumstance described to me
by any one who has witnessed the proceeding. This is not surprising,
seeing that my studies have been prosecuted almost entirely in London.
For any information obtained at the Gardens I am indebted solely to the
keepers, whose opportunities of observation when aided by intelligence
and experience merit the confidence of the inquirer.</p>

<p>So astonishing a phase of ophidian habits&mdash;let us say only <i>reputed
habits</i>&mdash;was, however, to me one to excite very special interest, as
well as to induce inquiry and a possible solution of the mystery; and
towards this solution the facts related in chap. xxiv. and xxv. appear
to me to come foremost in our aid. All snakes that are ovoviviparous,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_500" id="Page_500">[500]</a></span>
was the decision arrived at by the American ophiologists; or
<i>viviparous</i>, for we have seen that the two words have but little value
as a distinction. I would venture so far as to render it thus:&mdash;</p>

<p><i>In snakes which are either viviparous, or in which from some cause or
other extrusion has been so postponed that the young are conscious of
existence before birth.</i> Conscious also when born that they had been
safer in that pre-natal condition than now when assailed on all sides
by dangers hitherto unknown. This idea&mdash;and probably an untenable,
unphysiological, and foolish idea, which science might laugh to scorn
in an instant&mdash;still the idea did flash into my mind one day in the
summer of 1873, when Holland, announcing a brood of young ring snakes
which had just been hatched at the Gardens, and describing their baby
terrors, said, ‘It is funny to see how they all try to wriggle back
into their shells again.’</p>

<p>‘Then those little Colubers had been conscious of security before they
were hatched,’ I reflected, ‘and conscious when they did emerge into
activity that the shell had been a safe refuge to them.’ (This was
prior to the American Convention, of which I knew nothing until long
afterwards.)</p>

<p>Consciousness of locality must, I think, have a good deal to do with
the maternal refuge; and that snakes possess this consciousness in a
strong degree has been already shown in their habit of returning to
the same spot to hibernate year after year: and not only for winter
quarters; but a strong love of locality and a memory of home are
observed wherever snakes abound. ‘They remain in a hole or a crevice
of the wall for years,’ Fayrer affirms. In his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_501" id="Page_501">[501]</a></span> <i>Prairie Folk</i>,
Parker Gilmore tells of a family of ‘Puff adders’ (by which probably
<i>Heterodon platyrhinos</i> is meant) that had taken up their abode under
the boards of a porch for several years and could not be routed out.
Nicholson, also, in his <i>Indian Snakes</i>, informs us that when he was
stationed at Kamptee in 1868, a cobra and a pair of <i>Bungarus acutus</i>
lived in his bungalow for a long while. He could not find where
the cobra lived, but the Bungari made themselves at home in a hole
of the wall under his dressing-table. He never saw either of these
interlopers, but identified them by the skins which they ‘periodically
cast;’ taking advantage of his absence, no doubt, or of his nocturnal
somnolence, to perform their toilet under his looking-glass!</p>

<p>The often recounted tale of an Indian who had a tame rattlesnake
that went away every spring, and returned regularly each autumn to
a certain tub which it had appropriated for its home, is only an
example of affection for locality; but by those who were not cognisant
of this habit, the story has been produced with a strong flavour
of the marvellous, and the Indian who knew by the season when to
expect his creeping friend, was not slow to attribute the regular
return to especial regard for his own person. That <i>crotalus</i> coming
alone so regularly, was probably a lone widow or widower; because
we also know that the <i>pair</i> of snakes are usually seen together,
and that they follow each other with strong conjugal affection. This
is not irrelevant to the present subject; because the <i>affection</i>
of ophidians, whether conjugal or maternal, is what we are now
considering. The quality was well known in classic ages, though it
has been denied them in modern times. Many writers on snakes, while<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_502" id="Page_502">[502]</a></span>
affirming that they ‘exhibit no phase of affection,’ describe their
constantly going in pairs; or the fact that they become ‘vicious if
their retreat is cut off.’ ‘In their peregrinations male and female
are always in company,’ says Catlin; ‘and when only one is seen, the
other is sure to be within hearing.’ When a female has been killed and
left on the spot, the male always comes. The Indians profit by this
knowledge of conjugal devotion to lie in wait and kill the mate. They
place the dead one near the hole of their retreat, and watch the egress
of the survivor, which is sure to come and inspect its dead companion.</p>

<p>Sir Emerson Tennant observed a decided affection between the sexes of
the cobra. In his <i>History of Ceylon</i> he gives several proofs, as for
instance a cobra being killed in a bath, and the next day the mate
being found there. In Baird’s Report of one of the Pacific exploring
expeditions, a good deal is said about the Bull snake (<i>Pituophis</i>),
which follows its mate by the scent. Once a fine individual having been
captured and placed in a barrel near the tent, a large one of the same
species was shortly afterwards found close by, and in a direct line
from where its mate was caught.</p>

<p>So much for conjugal affection. As regards maternal devotion, we
certainly had a proof in the pythons remaining week after week on
their eggs. True, they took no notice of the little ones when hatched,
because they were well able to take care of themselves. The mothers
had fulfilled their duties beforehand. Snakes which are vicious at no
other time, menace those who approach their nests or cut off their
retreat. This is a fact universally recognised, alike in Africa, India,
Australia, and America: wherever a traveller,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_503" id="Page_503">[503]</a></span> a hunter, or a resident
incidentally mentions snake habits, he confirms this home affection.</p>

<p>‘Snakes, if aggressive at no other time, are always spiteful when they
have young,’ says Fayrer. And an anecdote is related of a man who
stumbled on a nest of young Hamadryads, and was pursued a long distance
by the angry mother. Terror added wings to his flight, as she came
fast upon him. In despair he plunged into a river and swam across,
but on reaching the opposite bank, up reared the furious Hamadryad,
its dilated eyes glistening with rage, ready to bury its fangs in his
trembling body. Escape now seemed hopeless, and as a last resource he
tore off his turban and threw that at the enemy. With characteristic
stupidity the snake plunged its fangs into this, biting it furiously.
After wreaking its vengeance upon the turban, it glided back to its
nest and its young ones and so the man escaped.</p>

<p><i>Apropos</i> of Indian snakes, Nicholson, though a practical ophiologist,
never heard of snakes swallowing their young in India. This may be
because so large a proportion of them are egg-laying, and because the
only two vipers, <i>Daboia</i> and <i>Echis</i>, are nocturnal, very shy, and
not so frequent. Most of the other members of the Indian <i>viperine</i>
snakes, the <i>Crotalidæ</i>, are tree snakes, which, like the sea snakes,
are more likely to be dispersed and separated from their progeny,
and to take refuge in flight. They are, besides, less frequent, shy,
nocturnal, or crepuscular; and belong more to Malay and Hindoo China,
than to the localities in which observations are more feasible. Fayrer
does not even state positively that they are viviparous. At the same
time<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_504" id="Page_504">[504]</a></span> Nicholson will ‘say nothing certain about the young going down
the throat, but sees no reason why not.’ ‘They can do without air for
half an hour or so, and a snake’s throat is sufficiently capacious to
allow a frog to croak <i>de profundis clamavi</i> when he is two feet from
daylight.’</p>

<p>Among unprejudiced observers there are still some who are inclined
to attribute to optical delusion the sudden disappearance of young
snakes; arguing from their astonishing rapidity of motion, and the
almost inappreciable space into which they can creep and hide in their
mother’s coils. Mr. Arthur Nicols, in his interesting papers on Snakes,
published in <i>The Country</i> newspaper, in 1878-79, describes a case of
this kind from personal observation when in Australia. He disturbed a
snake with a number of young around her, the latter quickly vanishing.
He discharged his gun, and the old snake was almost cut to pieces with
shot. Approaching, he found all the young ones hidden beneath and about
her, and when he stirred them up they persisted in hiding among the
shattered coils, returning thither to the last.</p>

<p>Mr. Nicols states only that it was a poisonous snake, not giving the
specific name. She had probably incubated her eggs, and the young had
remembered the shelter of their mother’s coils. That it was a display
of filial refuge is, however, undeniable.</p>

<p>A similar occurrence is related in the <i>Field</i> of November 10th, 1866,
by a Mr. Brittain, as an argument against the swallowing process.
He had seen young vipers run to their mother for protection, and so
completely out of sight that only on disturbing them they were found to
have secreted<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_505" id="Page_505">[505]</a></span> themselves in her coils. These may have been at a more
advanced age, and had ceased to enter the mouth.</p>

<p>It is remarkable that hitherto, excepting in <i>Pelias berus</i>, we hear
of this maternal display as peculiar to America only. Whether a more
intimate acquaintance with the snakes of other countries will reveal
new instances in the course of time, we cannot conjecture. It is
to be wished that observations on this head may be published, and
investigations encouraged; or in the minds of the million, the maternal
œsophagal refuge will still be classed among the fables.</p>

<p>Taking it for granted, then, in deference to the American ‘Convention,’
that snakes do offer refuge to their young, it is curious to speculate
as to how the habit originated and became a confirmed one. Maternal
instincts have, without doubt, been strong from the first; and we must
suppose that similar dangers to those which induce a snake now to
summon her young ones had also been the cause of postponed functions in
the mother, and that hers were precocious little reptiles before they
ever saw light.</p>

<p>Because we cannot assume that in a state of <i>security</i> an oviparous
snake would ‘retard its laying’ and become ovoviviparous or viviparous;
nor that a viper would intentionally retain her young until their fangs
were developed (see p. 360), so that they should be able to take care
of themselves; or a rattlesnake till its young had rattles as well as
fangs (see p. 299), these being the principal species which do shelter
their young. And the habit must have had a beginning; there must have
been some training, some development of instinct, to lead up to what we
now see, viz. a snake<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_506" id="Page_506">[506]</a></span> deliberately giving a signal, lowering her head
to the level of the ground or water, opening wide her mouth to receive
her young, and giving them a second sign when they might safely venture
forth again.</p>

<p>This is the state of things supposed to exist at the present time;
and it would seem to be an organized habit, perfected in process of
ages, and one in which the mother’s instinct, and a <i>consciousness of
harbouring active young ones before introducing them to surrounding
dangers</i>, must have had a considerable share.</p>

<p>In concluding this speculative chapter, I can only humbly beg to
‘second the motion’ put to the learned assembly at Portland, Maine,
in 1873, to the effect that the subject will receive the attention of
ophiologists in all the snake countries of the world.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-506.jpg" width="200" height="111"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_507" id="Page_507">[507]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-041.jpg" width="500" height="101"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XXVIII.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>SERPENT WORSHIP, ‘CHARMING,’ ETC.</i></p>


<p class="drop-cap04">IN the preceding pages it has been my endeavour to resolve some of the
superstitious myths into zoological facts, and to explain by the light
of science those peculiar features and manners of the Ophidia which
from the earliest traditions of the human race have been regarded as
supernatural.</p>

<p>In reviewing the general organization of these reptiles, their
marvellous powers and habits, can we wonder at the impressions they
have created in untutored minds? Let us picture to ourselves our
earliest ancestors with their dawning intellect contemplating the
instantaneous coil of a constrictor; or the almost invisible action
in a flash of time with which the death-dealing stroke of the poison
fang is effected. From a source which was incomprehensible, like the
burning, scathing fluid from the skies, came a ‘sting,’ an agony,
death! Awe-struck and filled with sacred terror were the beholders, as
before them lay the paralyzed, tortured victim. Can we wonder that the
slender, gliding<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_508" id="Page_508">[508]</a></span> ‘worm’ which inflicted this mortal injury should have
been regarded as an evil spirit, a devil, and invested with maleficence?</p>

<p>Add to the two great death-dealing powers of the serpent
race&mdash;constriction and venom&mdash;those other peculiarities which have
here been faithfully recorded, the seeming renewal of life after the
annual sleep, a mystery enhanced by the restored brilliancy and beauty
of the reptile on its change of cuticle; let us picture to ourselves
those wondering savages now watching the limbless creature as it glides
into sight and is gone again, or as with fixed and glittering eyes it
flickers that mysterious little tongue; let us imagine them crowding
near to behold a serpent feeding, or to witness the still more amazing
spectacle of a brood of young ones vanishing down their mother’s
throat. There is enough of the mysterious in an ophidian to excite the
awe and wonder of even a nineteenth-century beholder, taking each one
of these surprising doings singly; but considering that any one serpent
may be endowed with nearly all of these phenomenal powers, let us
imagine the effect produced by them in the savage mind. To worship such
an incomprehensible creature was only consistent with all we know of
the influences which first awakened faith in a supernatural Being.</p>

<p>Consequently we find that in every country where a serpent was known,
it plays its part in the mythology and religion of that country. We may
examine the antiquities of any nation which has left a monument of its
history and beliefs, and a serpent will be represented. Scarcely an
Egyptian sculpture (in its entirety) can be found in which the serpent
does not<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_509" id="Page_509">[509]</a></span> appear. The same may be said of the Hindoo monuments, their
temples, buildings, and sculptured caves; also of Mexican, Japanese,
Chinese, and other ancient mythologies.</p>

<p>Singularly, too, no other object in nature&mdash;no birds or flowers
or beautiful things&mdash;have been so universally adopted in personal
ornaments as the serpent idea. And in times of remote antiquity&mdash;as
relics prove&mdash;personal adornments, bracelets, coronets, and rings in
the form of serpents were as much in favour as at the present day. We
may, indeed, affirm that the modern bracelet is but a reproduction or
a restoration of those of antiquity, dating as far back as artificers
in metals can be traced. Rough and rude representations of still
earlier times are extant. And where the human race in its savage state
had no knowledge of art, the reptile itself, or such relics of it as
could be preserved, were adopted as personal decorations. Thus were
the American Indians found by the early colonists, with their belts of
snake skins, with the rattles of the Crotalus strung in their ears,
and with necklaces and chains of snake bones and ‘rattels.’ Mackeney,
Catlin, Schoolcraft, and other historians of the American Indians
relate numerous instances in proof of the universal veneration and
superstition with which the serpent is regarded by those savages. If
they kill a rattlesnake, it is immediately skinned and distributed
in small pieces among the tribe for their medicine bags, while the
captor is pompously decorated with the skin. If on a journey they
meet a rattlesnake in their direct path, this is taken to be a sign
that they must go no farther. Some of the Indian traditions bear a
remarkable resemblance to the prophetic symbols of the Hebrew faith.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_510" id="Page_510">[510]</a></span>
‘If thou bruise its head, it shall bruise thy heel.’ This in their eyes
is regarded as ‘destiny,’ and they will on no account kill one that
lies in their path, lest it should cause the death of the destroyer’s
relatives. The Indians are also supposed to possess the art of
snake-taming to an extraordinary degree. We are assured by more than
one writer that they also pet rattlesnakes, investing them with divine
attributes, and sheltering them during the winter; though in this case
the ‘tameness’ may be partially due to the inertness resulting from the
season of the year. On returning spring they permit their <i>Penates</i> to
issue forth again.</p>

<p>The ancient temples of Mexico were richly embellished with carvings
of serpents. One of them represents a serpent idol of not less than
seventy feet long, in the act of swallowing a human being. Also, there
is the ‘God of the Air,’ a feathered rattlesnake; and an edifice
known as the ‘Wall of Serpents,’ from the numerous reptilian forms
crowded upon it. But it is not necessary to enumerate antiquities,
with most of which the reader must be already acquainted, the object
here being rather to endeavour to account for those other attributes
which have grown out of serpent worship, such as ‘fascinating,’ taming,
‘charming,’ ‘dancing to music,’ etc.</p>

<p>Not that serpent worship is extinct by any means. In India it is still
so strong as to amount to a fatality; for the high annual death-rate
from snake bites there is not half so much because the natives can’t
be cured, as because they <i>won’t</i> be cured of what they regard as a
just punishment from their deity. This we shall have occasion to show
further on. That serpent superstitions are still rampant<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_511" id="Page_511">[511]</a></span> among the
low-caste Hindoos, is borne out by all modern writers on the native
faiths or customs. A. K. Forbes in his <i>Hindoo Annals</i>, or <i>Râs Mala</i>,
tells us that cobras are looked upon as guardian angels. One cobra
‘guarded’ a cave in which treasures were deposited; another cobra
‘guarded’ a garden; and very good guards we should say they were, as
few persons would venture too near to such an ‘angel.’ One of the
supposed ‘Divinities’ is the <i>Poorwug Dev</i>, or spirit personified by
a snake, which is not allowed to be killed or injured; and if it bite
a person, that individual is supposed to be justly punished for some
fault. Fatalism forbids any attempt to cure that unhappy victim, and he
swells the annual death-rate. Due honours are paid to these ‘guardian
angels’ found in most hamlets. Periodical festivals are held to them:
their retreats are then garlanded with flowers, and, as already
stated, eggs and milk are placed as propitiatory offerings. One of the
Bengalese traditions is, that a male infant auspiciously shaded by a
cobra will come to the throne.</p>

<p>And is the reptile which brings such distinction and honour into a
family to be ruthlessly destroyed? ‘No Hindoo will willingly kill a
cobra,’ Colonel Meadows Taylor tells us, in his <i>People of India</i>.
Should one be killed accidentally within the precincts of a guarded
village, a piece of copper money is put into its mouth, and the body is
burned with offerings to avert the anticipated evil. The <i>najas</i>, or
hooded snakes, from their habit of erecting themselves on the approach
of persons, are those especially regarded as guardians. It was the same
in Egypt. In the <i>najas</i> are also supposed to dwell the spirits<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_512" id="Page_512">[512]</a></span> of
highly-favoured persons, or those whose lives had been of remarkable
purity and goodness,&mdash;another motive for their being protected. It is
still the same in many parts of Africa, where the natives think ill
luck follows the death of a python.</p>

<p>In works where medical statistics are given, such as Fayrer’s
<i>Thanatophidia</i>, we learn the fatal results of these superstitions.
When the natives find a cobra in their houses, as is not unfrequently
the case, says Fayrer, ‘they will conciliate it, feed and protect it,
as though to injure it were to invoke misfortune on the house and
family. Even should the death of some relative, bitten by accident,
occur, the serpent is not killed, but caught and deferentially deported
to the field or jungle, where it is set free.’ No one can peruse the
above without seeing how largely the percentage of deaths is traceable
to native superstition. Fayrer also shows us the fatal consequences of
the confidence placed in the snake ‘charmers,’ who are considered to be
especially favoured by their deities, and endowed with curative powers.
Much interesting reading, apart from medical science, will be found in
the <i>Thanatophidia</i> on the Hindoo faith in the <i>müntras</i> or spells and
incantations used by the charmers in cases of snake-bite. Out of some
ninety such cases selected by Fayrer from returns sent in by medical
officers in the Bengal Presidency, nearly half proved that either no
remedies at all were tried, or that recourse was had to native nostrums
or <i>müntras</i>. Briefly to enumerate a few of the reports: ‘Boy bitten
by <i>keautiah</i>, charms and incantations; died in half an hour.’ ‘Man
keeping a krait (Bungarus) for “Poojah” (worship) was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_513" id="Page_513">[513]</a></span> bitten, and
died in seven hours, notwithstanding native nostrums.’ A woman bitten
died in three hours ‘<i>in spite of incantations</i>’! ‘A man bitten while
asleep had “<i>leaves to smell</i>,” but nevertheless died in three hours!’
‘Woman bitten at night, got up and had <i>müntras</i> (chantings) to expel
the poison. She died four hours after the bite notwithstanding; and
her infant at the breast died two hours after partaking the maternal
nutriment.’ And many similar cases. What wonder, then, with this
miserable fatalism prevailing over that vast and densely-populated
country, that death by snake-bites should amount to many thousands
annually? One more case must be recorded to show how deeply rooted the
faith. A tall, strong young man was bitten in the hand, while sleeping
out of doors. No medicine was given, but <i>incantations</i> were muttered
over him. In an hour he was a corpse: yet the village where this
happened continues to do Poojah (adoration) to the cause of the evil.
By far the largest percentage of deaths is attributable to the cobra,
though this is not a proof that its numbers predominate so much above
other snakes, as of the religious veneration in which it is everywhere
held. It is found all over the peninsula, even as high as 8000 feet on
the sunny slopes of the Himalayas. The names of castes, <i>Nâg</i>, <i>Nâgo</i>,
<i>Nâgojee</i>, <i>Nâgowa</i>, etc., found among all classes of Hindoos, have
all reference to the <i>Nâg</i> or <i>Nâja</i> deities, says Colonel Meadows
Taylor. To this author, as well as to Forbes, Ferguson,<a name="FNanchor_133_133" id="FNanchor_133_133"></a><a href="#Footnote_133_133" class="fnanchor">[133]</a> Fayrer,
and Miss Frere,<a name="FNanchor_134_134" id="FNanchor_134_134"></a><a href="#Footnote_134_134" class="fnanchor">[134]</a> the reader is referred in verification of the
above. If further to pursue the subject of snake<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_514" id="Page_514">[514]</a></span> worship, <i>The Serpent
Myths of Ancient Egypt</i>, by W. R. Cooper, 1873; <i>The Serpent Symbol</i>,
by Squires, 1851; <i>Sun and Serpent Worship</i>, by J. S. Phené; and
<i>The Native Races of the Pacific States of North America</i>, by H. H.
Bancroft, are some of the many books that afford interesting matter.
These latter, however, allude more particularly to ancient nations.
Among many living and semi-barbarous tribes serpent superstitions
exist, though, perhaps, more strongly in West Africa than elsewhere,
excepting India at the present time. In Africa, not the venomous so
much as the large constricting snakes are the objects of care and
veneration. In <i>Dahomey and the Dahomeans</i>, F. E. Forbes relates some
amusing instances of the sacred devotion of the Fetish women, or
guardians and slaves of the python deities at Whydah. A Fetish house
or temple devoted to the snakes was built round a large cotton-tree,
and in this a number of pythons were permitted to roam about at their
pleasure. When they ventured beyond the precincts, their Fetish
attendants went in search of them, and by gentle persuasions (probably
in the form of poultry or other dietetic arguments) induced them to go
home: while all who met them bowed down and kissed the dust of their
path. Morning and evening the devotees prostrated themselves before the
sacred abode of these ophidian deities, either to worship the invisible
god <i>Seh</i>, or his representatives in serpentine form.</p>

<p>From frequent and gentle handling, snakes thus protected naturally grow
tame. The Fetish attendants become skilled in managing their reptile
gods, and are not slow in investing themselves with especial powers for
their office. And to this may the origin of the so-called ‘charmers’ be
traced;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_515" id="Page_515">[515]</a></span> for ‘snake charming,’ like snake worship, dates back to the
very earliest ages. With a more intimate knowledge of the reptilian
class which modern zoology has brought about, comes happily a clearer
insight into the tricks of the snakemen, jugglers, and charmers of
Egypt and the East. Snake-taming to-day is not confined to <i>Saadees</i>
and <i>Samp Wallahs</i>; it is not even confined to non-venomous snakes,
of which pythons have always proved very amenable pets. Mr. Mann’s
tame pythons (see ‘Introduction’) were popular performers at the time
they were introduced in Chancery, and his pet constrictor, ‘Cleo,’ was
honoured with an obituary notice from the pen of Mr. Frank Buckland,
in <i>Land and Water</i>, after she died ‘of grief,’ as was said, at the
illness of her master.<a name="FNanchor_135_135" id="FNanchor_135_135"></a><a href="#Footnote_135_135" class="fnanchor">[135]</a> The amiable ‘Cleo’ (or Cleopatra) was the
‘constant companion’ of Mr. and Mrs. Mann for several years, and they
soon learned her wishes when she ‘asked’ for either food, drink, or
fresh air. ‘A short time before her death she contracted a friendship
for a young kitten,’ was always ‘fond of children,’ who displayed no
fear of that sociable ophidian. But she was shy of strangers; and this
I myself realized on paying my respects to her; for not until she was
fully convinced that I had no evil intentions, and not without much
coaxing and persuasion on the part of her guardians, could Cleo be
induced to approach me.</p>

<p>Several of the constricting snakes at the Zoological Gardens of even
larger size than Cleo are exceedingly tame, permitting themselves
to be handled. One of them, a temporary inmate during the winter of
1881-82, was introduced to the public by Dr. Stradling through the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_516" id="Page_516">[516]</a></span>
columns of <i>Land and Water</i>, April 3, 1880, as ‘Totsey,’ together
with her brother ‘Snap,’ the latter named ‘from a trifling infirmity
of temper when young.’ These two were the offspring of the Panama boa
who gave birth to 20 live young at the Gardens, June 30, 1877. Of
these twenty, Mr. Sclater notified, at one of the Zoological Society’s
meetings in the following November, that all but one were still alive.
Of the two which became the property of Dr. Stradling and were tamed
by him, he wrote, ‘Any one can handle them with impunity;’ and that
they recognised him among others in the dark, permitting him only to
touch them at such a time. ‘Lolo’ and ‘Menina’ are the pretty names of
two other tame constrictors belonging to this ophiophilist, and whose
amiable and interesting manners were recorded in the above journal. Of
‘Totsey’ the Dr. writes, ‘She is the most gentle and affectionate snake
I ever had.’ As this same Miss Ophidia happened to be an inmate at the
Gardens in January 1882, when the pair of illustrations (p. 205) were
in preparation, she adorns that page; though in truth it was one of her
brothers or sisters, then rather smaller, that really did hang thus on
the branch as I sketched it at the time, September 24, 1880.</p>

<p>That some of the most venomous serpents are also capable of being
tamed we have many proofs. They use their fangs in self-defence,
actuated by fear or hunger; and where no fear exists, a serpent
would not deliberately crawl about, expending its precious and only
protective power, <i>venom</i>, on any object it met with. Would a cobra or
a crotalus in its native woods approach any living thing it saw and
indiscriminately strike it with its poison fangs? No. Its<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_517" id="Page_517">[517]</a></span> primary
impulse would be to escape. It strikes only under provocation or
hunger. Therefore if a venomous snake in captivity become so familiar
with your presence as to cease to fear you, it would also abstain
from biting you. Not that one would recommend Jararacas or cobras for
pets, notwithstanding the assurance of some residents in India that
the latter are capital guards to a dwelling, and in some are even
encouraged instead of dogs, as the less liable to bite of the two! Miss
Frere, in her interesting reminiscences of India, <i>Old Deccan Days</i>,
gives instances of children playing with the cobra without injury.
She mentions a Brahman boy who could without any other music than his
own voice attract and handle with impunity any venomous serpents that
might be within hearing. They would come out of a thicket or a dry
stone wall&mdash;their favourite refuge. Such instances are sufficiently
rare to be regarded as miraculous, adds the authoress, still they do
occur. ‘How much is due to gentleness of touch and fearlessness, how
much to any personal peculiarity which pleases the senses of the snake,
it is difficult to say.’ The boy above alluded to was believed to be
the incarnation of some divinity, and the magistrate took note of his
proceedings.</p>

<p>But at last, through some inadvertency, he got bitten; when he
died, notwithstanding the divinity he was supposed to enshrine,
notwithstanding the spells and <i>müntras</i> which might be pronounced over
him.</p>

<p>The cobra is supposed to have originally had seven heads, as we see
represented on Hindoo temples. The ‘hood’ is believed to be the remains
of these seven heads; and the <i>Gokurrah</i>, whose pattern of the double
ocellus had gained it<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_518" id="Page_518">[518]</a></span> the name of the ‘spectacled cobra,’ is held
in the highest esteem of all from the two spots being considered the
footprints of the god <i>Krishna</i>. These are the especial favourites of
the professional snake charmers.</p>

<p>When it is borne in mind that snakes have been tamed by persons of
only slight experience, we can easily comprehend that with a life’s
practice, and with inherited facilities, the Oriental jugglers must
acquire peculiar expertness in dealing with their ‘charmed’ specimens.
Originally, no doubt, the office of the professed snake tamer was
connected with the sacred rites of serpent-worshipping communities, but
has now greatly degenerated into the trade of jugglers and tricksters.
That some of these do acquire extraordinary skill in dealing with their
dangerous captives cannot be denied. Profound faith is placed in their
performances by the natives, who attribute to them supernatural agency.
From being close observers of reptile character, they know how far to
venture on familiarities. They thoroughly understand the movements
of the sluggish and timid serpents with which they are toying; and
while keeping up a perpetual gabble to divert the attention of the
spectators, aggravated by the tum-tumming and so-called ‘music’ to
which the snakes are supposed to ‘dance,’ they themselves keep just
beyond striking reach, and provoke the snake to follow the waving
motion of their hands. The true object or impulse of the snake is to
bite the irritating cause, the pretended motive is ‘dancing.’ To follow
the movement of the object which provokes them is instinctive, music
or not; and without any din and cackle and jargon, the cobras would do
this all the same. Long<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_519" id="Page_519">[519]</a></span> practice and an intimate acquaintance have
given the jugglers confidence and dexterity, while on the part of the
snake fear is the chief characteristic. Even the tamest cobra is only
watching the opportunity to escape, and the moment the juggler ceases
his performance, down it drops, and makes for its basket. Should
the performance not be ended, the snakes are called to attention by
being sharply pulled back by their tail, when up they rise with hood
expanded, and with just enough of power and spirit left in them to
recommence the ‘dance,’ more truly to make one more futile attempt to
strike their tyrannical masters. It is only a repetition of the same
kind of ‘obedience’ and ‘intelligence’ that was accredited to that
first rattlesnake ever exhibited in England.</p>

<p>That showman (introduced p. 285) had become well acquainted with
crotalus idiosyncracies, and knew how to turn them to account before an
ignorant crowd.</p>

<p>Those who have to deal with venomous serpents tell us, that with
caution and expertness they are not difficult to handle; and this
is verified by all who describe the performances of Oriental
snake-charmers. Not only cobras with fangs extracted, or mouths sewn
up, or composition ‘cerastes’ with artificial horns fastened on to the
heads of harmless snakes, but those with perfect fangs and well-filled
poison glands, are handled with equal facility. By pressing down the
snake’s head gently with a stick and then seizing it firmly close
behind the head, so close that it has no power to turn it, you fetter
its movements. Or to snatch up a venomous snake by its tail and quickly
support it festooned on a stick which you draw gently towards the
head, and then<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_520" id="Page_520">[520]</a></span> secure that as above, is another method adopted; or,
again, to seize the tail and pass the hand swiftly along the body
till the head is reached, and <i>then</i> grasp the neck. These are among
the various ways of handling poisonous serpents, according to the
purposes required of them. Every movement must be carefully watched,
however, and the head not released until the entire snake is free to be
returned straight into its cage. Even wild and vicious cobras are thus
fearlessly dealt with by experts; and those which are in process of
taming are put through a daily training. They are made comfortable in a
basket, conciliated with food and milk, soothed by softly stroking them
with a brush and by kind and gentle handling.</p>

<p>I once stood by and looked on while the keeper unpacked a box of
cobras. He took each one out by its tail, and dropped it into another
box with such expedition that the fearful reptile had not time to turn
and bite him. Not that he ventured to lower his hand into the midst
of the writhing angry tangle of snakes, but first, at a respectful
distance (the writer still more deferentially contemplating the
transfer from afar), he, with a long-handled hook, contrived to draw
out a snake tail first, and getting the tip over the edge of the box,
this he seized, thus, one after the other, shifting eight of the dozen
cobras. Both boxes had lids, of course&mdash;glass slides, which were
cautiously but quickly drawn aside, and as sharply closed again.<a name="FNanchor_136_136" id="FNanchor_136_136"></a><a href="#Footnote_136_136" class="fnanchor">[136]</a>
These deadly reptiles, after being some weeks, perhaps months, in
a small close box, were not, as may be supposed, in a very lively
condition, but sufficiently so to erect themselves and hiss like a
flock of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_521" id="Page_521">[521]</a></span> geese, striking at the lid and the glass, and doing their
best to alarm the manipulator, and also to suspend the breath of my
awe-struck self. Calmly and safely, however, Holland concluded his task.</p>

<p>By pressing down the head with a stick, or seizing it quickly by the
tail, American Indians similarly manage the rattlesnakes. Not they
alone, however, are skilled in taming these deadly reptiles. Here, at
home in England, domesticated <i>Crotali</i> are not unknown. Dr. Stradling
thinks they may be rendered as harmless as non-venomous kinds, by a
gradual training; and has succeeded in so far taming one that he felt
safe in offering it as a gift to even an unskilled non-charmer. ‘I have
a very <i>nice</i> tame rattlesnake between four and five feet long, in good
condition and feeding well, which I shall be delighted to send you,’
he wrote me, August 1881. ‘It has got so tame that you might handle it
without fear at any time you wished to investigate any part of it.’ It
is perhaps superfluous to add that this amiable and exemplary reptile
was gratefully declined.</p>

<p>The reader’s devoted servant had not undergone a course of
prophylactics as the Doctor had. He is both an expert and to a certain
extent venom-proof at the same time; but for all that the snake was, as
he affirmed, tame enough to be handled with impunity by those who might
have sufficient courage to venture. That interesting and accommodating
rattlesnake is no more, but was even more honoured in death than in
life. A true martyr to science, it was sacrificed that its friend and
teacher might prosecute his experiments, and also swallow some of
the contents of its poison gland, in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_522" id="Page_522">[522]</a></span> order to convince two or three
challenging sceptics that he could do this with impunity.<a name="FNanchor_137_137" id="FNanchor_137_137"></a><a href="#Footnote_137_137" class="fnanchor">[137]</a></p>

<p>As in all other trades, there are various grades among the Oriental
snake-tamers. The legitimate ‘charmer’ of India&mdash;the <i>Samp
Wallah</i>&mdash;prides himself on being a descendant of the prophet, and the
secret of his art is cherished as an heirloom in his family. This
also is the case in Arabia and Egypt, where the astonishing feats
which, without any doubt, are performed by professional ‘snake men,’
are attributed to special and secret powers, jealously guarded from
age to age. It may be possible that, like the Psylli of old, they may
have recourse to some drug which renders their person repugnant to the
serpent, and thus provides immunity from a bite. Not yet altogether
discarded, either, is the ancient belief that in the body of the
viper itself is found a specific for its poison. Since the days of
Æsculapius, decoctions of vipers and recipes enough to form an Ophidian
cookery-book and pharmacopeia combined, have found favour not only
among the ‘faculty’ of classic days, but among all our ancestral dames.
We are told that vipers abound in volatile salts that are cures for
many ills. Certain it is that ‘viper wine,’ viper broth, viperine
salts, the powder of dried vipers, preparations from the dejecta,
the oil, and even the slough have all enjoyed a high reputation,
and I believe are&mdash;<i>some</i> of these at any rate&mdash;still in vogue in
secluded districts where the refinements of medical science have not
yet replaced them. It is remarkable, too, that for skin affections
their virtues chiefly commend themselves.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_523" id="Page_523">[523]</a></span> The ancient belief that to
devour vipers proved a specific for their bite, has to the present
day prevailed among the snake-charmers of Egypt, who&mdash;whether or not
from this practice&mdash;are said so to assimilate their bodies that the
venom does not harm them. The Bushmen of South Africa, it is asserted,
swallow poison to render themselves proof against its effects; and
history records many other tribes who have had such confidence in their
own and an inherited immunity, that they hesitated not in exposing
their infants to deadly serpents. The Persian word <i>Bezoar</i>, a popular
drug, means counter-poison; in allusion to the immunity from poison
which persons who feed on venomous snakes are believed to enjoy.</p>

<p>Though much discredit has been thrown on these so-called ‘immunities,’
and though it is so very difficult to know what to believe where a
serpent is concerned, the possibility does appear to be borne out by
some authentic writers of our own time. The late John Keast Lord, when
in Egypt, had frequent opportunities of observing the tricks of the
jugglers; and not only he, but, as he assures us, many intelligent and
educated Europeans, fully believed that some secret power was practised
by the ‘high-caste’ charmers, who really did exhibit astonishing feats
with their snakes. Of these, the habit of devouring the reptiles alive
can here admit only of bare allusion.<a name="FNanchor_138_138" id="FNanchor_138_138"></a><a href="#Footnote_138_138" class="fnanchor">[138]</a></p>

<p>In <i>Dahomey and the Dahomeans</i>, F. E. Forbes tells of the natives
walking fearlessly bare legged in the grass where snakes abound, and
that on one occasion on alluding to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_524" id="Page_524">[524]</a></span> danger, a boy said to him: ‘No
fear; if my father is bitten, he knows of an herb that will cure him.’</p>

<p>Another recent authority whom we are bound to respect is Schliemann. In
his work <i>Troy and its Remains</i>, published in 1875, he writes (p. 117):
‘We still find poisonous snakes among the stones as far down as from
thirty-three to thirty-six feet, and I have hitherto been astonished
to see my workmen take hold of the reptiles with their hands and play
with them: nay, yesterday I saw one of the men bitten twice by a viper,
without seeming to trouble himself about it. When I expressed my
horror, he laughed, and said that he and all his comrades knew there
were a great many snakes in this hill, and they had therefore all
drunk a decoction of the snake-weed, which grows in the district, and
which renders the bite harmless. Of course I ordered a decoction to be
brought to me, so that I also may be safe from these bites. I should,
however, like to know whether this decoction would be a safeguard
against the fatal effects of the bite of the hooded cobra, of which
in India I have seen a man die within half an hour. If it were so, it
would be a good speculation to cultivate snake-weed in India.’</p>

<p>A correspondent in <i>Land and Water</i>, signed ‘R. C.,’ quoting
Schliemann, inquired the name of this snake-weed, but without eliciting
information. Most of the countries in which snakes abound would seem to
rejoice in ‘snake-weeds’ and ‘snake-roots.’ ‘It has pleased nature that
there should be nothing without its antidote,’ said Pliny; and though
‘the faculty’ tell us that no antidote for snake venom has as yet been
discovered, it nevertheless appears to be certain that the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_525" id="Page_525">[525]</a></span> Arabs, the
Nubians, Egyptians, and other nations seek to procure immunity from
snake-bite by the use of certain plants, of which the <i>Aristolochias</i>
seem to be most frequent. The juice or a decoction is drunk, the root
chewed, and an infusion used for washing the skin. The South American
Indians are said to be able thus to protect themselves; and we have
the high authority of Humboldt in support of the theory that the
famous <i>huaco</i>, and other poisonous plants with which they inoculate
themselves, may impart an odour to their bodies which is repugnant to
the snakes.</p>

<p>It would be well to obtain definite information as to what the
‘snake-weed’ of Schliemann was, <i>botanically</i>. It is also important to
ascertain the species of ‘viper’ that is there so abundant; then there
would be a basis for investigation. The testimony of a traveller like
Schliemann is not to be disregarded. Besides him, Livingstone, P. H.
Gosse, and others have affirmed the same thing, viz. the existence of
antidotal plants, but which, in the hands of science, seem never to
disclose their virtues!</p>

<p>As a part of the present subject comes a serpent’s supposed love of
‘music,’ and on this head again the evidence is contradictory. Setting
aside the idea of ‘music,’ in the way of melody or harmony, we may
be able to arrive at a clue to the undeniable fact that snakes do
exhibit some consciousness of <i>noise</i>. ‘Music,’ properly so called,
is certainly very far removed from the gourd-rapping and tum-tumming
of the Oriental jugglers; yet the snakes display a consciousness of
these uncouth sounds. Mr. Mann affirmed that Cleo and his other pet
boas manifested undoubted feeling&mdash;let us call it consciousness&mdash;when
the piano was being<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_526" id="Page_526">[526]</a></span> played. Dr. Arthur Stradling, on the contrary,
tells us that his own snakes ‘are almost always within hearing of a
piano, and never show the slightest emotion at the sound.’<a name="FNanchor_139_139" id="FNanchor_139_139"></a><a href="#Footnote_139_139" class="fnanchor">[139]</a> His
observations, I believe, refer chiefly to his life at sea, where his
cabin did duty as concert-room, menagerie, and all else combined, and
where, apart from piano, there would be ceaseless noise and jarring;
or even if on shore, the ‘always’ would rather support my own theory
or speculation as to any feasible solution of the fact that serpents
are affected by <i>noise</i>, not ‘music.’ And my idea is, that it is the
jarring or vibration <i>through solids</i>, and not the mere sound, that
thus affects the snakes. Since first venturing to express this idea
in the <i>Dublin University Magazine</i>, Jan. 1876, I have continued to
observe the effect on snakes of what we may call <i>disturbing noises</i>.
At the Gardens, where they become accustomed to noises of all kinds,
it is less easy to arouse them; but when the place is unusually quiet,
the experiment may be tried. The ‘snake men’ of the East, whose trade
is to hunt out snakes by means of sound, effect this by <i>rapping</i> on
the wall or ceiling, or by making loud, clucking noises with their
tongue as much as by their so-called ‘music;’ and Pliny,&mdash;if we may
cite Pliny to suit our purpose and discard him otherwise,&mdash;or whoever
<i>he</i> quotes, affirms that snakes are more easily aroused by the <i>sound</i>
of footsteps than by the sight of the approaching person. A custom is
prevalent in Ceylon, we are told, of using a jingling stick in the dark
to strike the ground in order to frighten snakes out of the path. The
jingling ‘music’ here is disturbing, not alluring, but as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_527" id="Page_527">[527]</a></span> regards the
knocking it proves sensitiveness to vibration conveyed by the ground.
The American Indians are <i>experts</i> in the way of ascertaining sounds
as conveyed by the ground. They throw themselves prone upon the earth,
pressing their ear close to it, and are able to decide with great
accuracy the direction, the distance, and the nature of a far-off
sound. May we not conclude, then, that the perception of sound to a
serpent is through solids, a feeling more than a hearing of noises?
The creature, always prone to the ground or other solids, and with an
internal aural apparatus, must be peculiarly sensitive to vibrations
thus conveyed.</p>

<p>‘Lizzie,’ the heroine of chap. xxvi., was proved to be sensitive to
disturbing noises, and her ophidian relatives are probably similarly
affected. As to <i>tune</i>, any sharp sound will answer; and as to time, it
is not the ‘music,’ but, as we have already hinted, the waving hand or
knee, or bright colours used by the <i>charmers</i>, to which the movements
of the serpents respond. This also is a subject quite worth scientific
investigation.</p>

<p>A word in conclusion about the ‘fascination of the serpent’s eye,’ a
fable of so remote a date that it is as hard as any to eradicate. Even
scientific observers admit that there is a <i>something</i> that attracts
the eyes of birds or small mammals such as squirrels, timid creatures
which often stare fixedly at ourselves as much as at a snake. Dr. A.
Smith says: ‘Whatever may be said in ridicule of fascination, it is
nevertheless true that birds and even quadrupeds are, under certain
circumstances, unable to retire from the presence of their enemies, and
what is even more extraordinary, unable to resist the propensity to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_528" id="Page_528">[528]</a></span>
advance from a situation of actual safety into one of danger.<a name="FNanchor_140_140" id="FNanchor_140_140"></a><a href="#Footnote_140_140" class="fnanchor">[140]</a> He
has seen birds collect round the African tree snakes, particularly the
Boomslange (described p. 407), and fly to and fro, shrieking, until
one of them almost touches its lips.’ Exactly so. We are not <i>told</i> as
much, but every one who knows anything of snake life will feel quite
sure that those tree snakes were making good use of their delicate
tongues in order to ascertain all they could about those enticing
shriekers; and that the birds were equally desirous of knowing what
dainty in the shape of worm or flitting creature that tongue might be.
In the case of the rattlesnake the ‘fascinated’ birds are probably
enticed by the insect they think they <i>hear</i>, as well as that they
think they <i>see</i>, in the supposed worm wriggling so temptingly and
vanishing so strangely. The snake remains rigidly still the while, the
only moving thing being that investigating tongue.</p>

<p>My observations at the Zoological Gardens first led me to this
conclusion. On the feeding days several years ago, when watching to
detect the ‘fascination’ one had been led to expect, I noticed that
the birds&mdash;even the sparrows and finches&mdash;were attracted by the tongue
of the snake, and would stop when hopping about the cage and look
intently and curiously on the vibrating tongue. Some would venture on a
closer inspection, and remain gazing, or would even peck at it, until a
movement of the snake told them that the motionless object from which
that wriggling thing protruded was a living animal. Then they might hop
away indifferently, happily unconscious that what they had perched on
as a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_529" id="Page_529">[529]</a></span> branch or a log was animated with a hungering after themselves.</p>

<p>Any further ‘spell,’ or ‘fascination,’ or attraction might be
attributed to a soporific or paralytic rather than a pleasurable
influence; and arising from the noxious breath of a venomous serpent,
or the fixity of its eyes, never blinking. Horses, dogs, and other
animals have an intuitive perception of the vicinity of a snake, and
refuse to advance; is it therefore reasonable to conclude that the
lesser animals are not similarly affected? It is serpent nature to
wait motionless for its prey. Any creature coming unexpectedly upon
that rigid object, with its fixed, glittering eyes, would, actuated
by mingled alarm and curiosity, stop to make itself acquainted with
the extraordinary sight, the only life or motion in which would be
the tongue suddenly and silently appearing and disappearing. A bird
might be beguiled within striking distance, or might stop spell-bound.
We ourselves are sometimes impelled to approach an unaccountable yet
terrifying object. Fear has also a paralyzing effect, and we remain
motionless, breathless, with eyes as fixed as a serpent’s.</p>

<p>Observation of nature and an inquiry into causes will often present
very commonplace reasons for what appears to savour of the marvellous.
A snake has just made a meal of some fledgelings. The mother bird has
witnessed her offspring vanishing by degrees, and she frantically
hovers over the reptile, fluttering to and fro, and probably uttering
cries of distress or of enticement, in the hope of her young ones’
return. Birds have been observed thus endeavouring to rescue a
half-swallowed fledgeling. The naturalist at once<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_530" id="Page_530">[530]</a></span> comprehends the
reason; the poet thinks the birds are ‘fascinated.’</p>

<p>I am not aware that any other ophiologist than Dr. Stradling, in
discussing the ‘fascination’ idea, has attributed to the tongue of a
snake an allurement in the shape of a prospective meal. In one of his
papers to <i>Land and Water</i> (April 2, 1881) he described a hen that had
been put into the cage for his anaconda’s dinner, making ‘a determined
dab at the snake’s tongue, sometimes two or three dabs in quick
succession,’ every time the quivering black line caught her eye. ‘Now
why does she do that?’ he asks. ‘Certainly from no animosity towards
the snake, in whose presence she has not the slightest consciousness
of danger, as she was otherwise engaged in pecking up the maize that
was in the cage. My own idea is that she mistakes the tongue for a
wriggling worm,’ adds the observer in almost the very words I had used
more than six years previously,<a name="FNanchor_141_141" id="FNanchor_141_141"></a><a href="#Footnote_141_141" class="fnanchor">[141]</a> long before we had exchanged a
word on the subject or were even acquainted. He further described in
the same issue of <i>Land and Water</i>, and also in the <i>Field</i> (June 3,
1882), how a scarlet <i>tanager</i> in Costa Rica had been attracted out
of a tree down close to a snake by its quivering tongue, the only
moving thing about it. Dr. Stradling had seen a frog similarly snapping
at the tongue of a snake, and thinks that one of the chief uses of
the mysterious little organ is to attract insectivorous animals. My
own observations prove the tongue to be a <i>successful</i> lure, which
may go a good way towards explaining ‘fascination;’ but whether an
<i>intentional<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_531" id="Page_531">[531]</a></span></i> lure, any more than an intentional intimidation, as
discussed in chap. v., I hesitate to affirm.</p>

<p>‘Fascination,’ then, may be sometimes imputed to curiosity, sometimes
to an anticipated morsel. It may partake of fear, or it may be an
involuntary approach; it may be the struggles of a poisoned creature
unable to get away, or the maternal anxieties of a bird or small mammal
whose offspring has fallen a victim to the snake. Divesting it of
all poetry or magic, it will admit of several matter-of-fact, albeit
sometimes tragic explanations.</p>

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-531.jpg" width="200" height="193"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_532" id="Page_532">[532]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-001.jpg" width="500" height="109"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XXIX.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>THE VENOMS AND THEIR REMEDIES.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap08">ON a subject which has baffled research in all ages, viz. the endeavour
to discover an antidote for snake venom, it scarcely becomes me to
speak. Yet, as in the foregoing chapters, I may at least venture to lay
before my readers some general account of the various remedies used in
snake regions, and, for the benefit of residents in those countries,
describe the most approved means of treating the bites of venomous
serpents. Information of this kind will not, I trust, be wholly useless.</p>

<p>First, it may be as well to impressively repeat what has been already
constantly affirmed by all our scientific experimentalists on snake
venoms, that ‘as yet <i>no antidote to them has been found</i>.’ Remedies
there are in abundance; and it is just as great an error to believe
that all snake venom is incurable&mdash;<i>i.e.</i> that a bitten person must
necessarily die&mdash;as that there are countless ‘antidotes,’ as persons
broadly and loosely call the various means of cure.</p>

<p>At the time when Professor Halford’s treatment by subcutaneous
injections of ammonia were so popularly discussed, you might read week
after week of ‘Halford’s<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_533" id="Page_533">[533]</a></span> newly-discovered antidote for snake-bites.’
Professor Halford, so far from claiming the discovery of an ‘antidote,’
emphatically explained that ammonia thus used was ‘only a mode of
treatment.’ ‘It must never be forgotten,’ he said, ‘that ammonia cannot
<i>destroy</i> the venom;’ by which we comprehend what the scientific mean
by an ‘antidote,’ something that effectually <i>destroys, neutralizes,
and annihilates</i> the poison. Sir Joseph Fayrer, after long and
elaborate experiments with the Indian thanatophidia, prescribes various
remedies and modes of treatment, ‘but do not confuse these with
<i>antidotes</i>!’ he urges.<a name="FNanchor_142_142" id="FNanchor_142_142"></a><a href="#Footnote_142_142" class="fnanchor">[142]</a> ‘To conceive of an <i>antidote</i> to snake
poison in the true sense of the term,’ he explains, ‘one must imagine
a substance so subtle as to follow, overtake, and neutralize the
venom in the blood, or that shall have the power of counteracting and
neutralizing the deadly influence it has exerted on the vital forces.
Such a substance has still to be found, and our present experience of
the action of drugs does not lead to hopeful anticipation that we shall
find it.’</p>

<p>Notwithstanding these confident assertions, we are continually
reading of ‘an infallible cure for snake-bite, never known to fail;’
‘another antidote to snake-bite;’ or that ‘at length an antidote
has been discovered,’ which on investigation may be something tried
long ago, and occasionally with success, or it may be a plant or a
chemical preparation which under certain circumstances effects a cure,
but none of which will stand the above definition of <i>antidote</i>.
Each new attempt is announced as ‘an antidote’ nevertheless. Dr.
Arthur Stradling was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_534" id="Page_534">[534]</a></span> severely hauled over the coals for ‘boasting
of an antidote,’ when it accidentally transpired that he had been
experimenting on himself ‘with a view to discovering, <i>not an
antidote</i>, but a prophylactic against the venom,’ to use his own
words.<a name="FNanchor_143_143" id="FNanchor_143_143"></a><a href="#Footnote_143_143" class="fnanchor">[143]</a></p>

<p>More recently still permanganate of potash has been announced as
an antidote; and no doubt in some cases it has proved a successful
<i>remedy</i>, as occasionally, but not invariably, other treatments have
been. There still, however, appears to be the same lack of substantial
evidence with regard to its being an ‘infallible antidote’ in the
chemical acceptation of the term; and indeed as venoms themselves
vary, a remedy that might prove effectual in one case might fail in
another. Dr. Stradling, than whom perhaps few are more competent
to offer opinions on the subject (he having for five or six years
subjected himself to experiments and carefully noted the effects on
his own person, as others have noted the effects on animals and birds
bitten), says that you might as well hunt through the pharmacopeia for
a drug that will be a specific in every kind of fever, or ‘to look for
a general antidote to opium, strychnine, bella donna, arsenic, and
mercury poisoning,’ as to expect to find one antidote for every kind of
snake venom. ‘When we know how many different venoms there are, we may
look for an antidote to each,’ he has explained.</p>

<p>Years ago the venoms were classed under the heads of <i>Viperine</i>,
<i>Echidnine</i>, <i>Crotaline</i>, etc.; but Dr. Stradling states that he has
found very different venoms in <i>Crotalus horridus</i> and <i>Crotalus
durissus</i>, and that he prepared himself differently for each species
of snake with which he experimented,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_535" id="Page_535">[535]</a></span> having in five different species
found five distinct and separate venoms. The bite of one snake more
rapidly affects the blood, that of another the nerves; while the local
and the constitutional symptoms also vary; but ‘all are attended
more or less with rigors, delirium, syncope, convulsions, paralysis,
and coma.’ Many of the so-called cures have not been cures at all,
because, as was afterwards found, the snakes that inflicted the bites
were not venomous. This we can understand from the indiscriminate use
of such vernaculars as ‘adder,’ ‘jararaca,’ ‘cobra,’ as explained
in previous chapters. Or, if undoubtedly a bite has been given by
an undoubtedly venomous kind, it does not follow that a full charge
of venom accompanied the bite. The glands may have been previously
exhausted, the snake may have been feeble, or it might not have
expended its poison. For among other marvels we are led to believe that
vipers, perhaps also the <i>elapidæ</i>, have a control over their store
of venom, and do not involuntarily expend it, that is, when <i>forced</i>
to bite. ‘Great doubt exists as to the efficacy of forced bites,’
says Nicholson. Dr. Weir Mitchel came to the same conclusion in his
rattlesnake experiments, viz. that a snake ‘is able voluntarily to
control the shedding of its poison when inflicting a wound or grasping
an object with its jaws.’ This accounts for many bites not having
proved fatal, and for reputed antidotes having effected ‘cures.’ Nor,
when we come to think of it, does this control of the venom appear
so extraordinary after all. The poison gland is a modification of
ordinary salivary glands; and, if we may have recourse to a not very
elegant comparison, a person or an animal can simulate the <i>action</i> of
biting or of spitting without ejecting<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_536" id="Page_536">[536]</a></span> saliva. Again, as Dr. Stradling
expresses it, ‘snake virus is a natural secretion provided for the
distinct physiological purpose of enabling the reptile to secure its
prey.’<a name="FNanchor_144_144" id="FNanchor_144_144"></a><a href="#Footnote_144_144" class="fnanchor">[144]</a> Fayrer also explains that some snakes, naturally sluggish,
‘bite reluctantly;’ but, if irritated and made angry, then ‘with great
force and determination.’ In the one instance a bitten person might
recover, in the second case die, because here the snake ‘thoroughly
imbedded its fangs’ (p. 379).</p>

<p>It is often asked, ‘Which is the most poisonous snake?’&mdash;a question
as difficult to answer as, ‘Which is the most poisonous plant?’ Dr.
Günther’s opinion is that the degree of danger depends less on the
<i>species</i> which inflicts the wound, than on the bulk of the snake, the
quantity of its venom, the season or temperature, and the place of the
wound. Quantity for quantity, the virus of one snake is more active or
more powerful than another, and different in its effects; but then the
lesser discharge of poison directly into a vein might be more serious
than a full discharge in a part where absorption is slow. Also exactly
the same quantity, minim for minim, would more seriously affect a
warm than a cold blooded animal, more seriously affect a feeble and
timid person or animal than the brave and vigorous. Yet, as there is
a notable gradation in the development of the poison apparatus, the
perfection of which culminates in the viper, it seems not unreasonable
to decide that as a rule a viper is more virulent than an elaps of the
same size&mdash;let us say <i>bulk</i>, because the viperine snakes are short and
thick and the <i>elapidæ</i> long and slight. Each snake is supplied with
venom adequate to its own requirements, that is, enough to kill the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_537" id="Page_537">[537]</a></span>
prey on which it subsists, a large viper with a larger supply for a
larger animal; and a small elaps with enough to kill its little bird
or mouse. There may be exceptions; as, for instance, in the <i>Callophis
intestinalis</i>, whose glands are abnormally developed, though it is not
a large snake; still accidents or experiments rather go to prove that
a viper is more noxious than an elaps under similar conditions. Fayrer
proved the virulence of <i>Echis carinata</i>, the little Indian 18-inch
viper’s poison, by diluting a quarter of a drop of its venom in ten
drops of water and injecting it into the leg of a fowl, which died in
ten minutes; while the same proportions of cobra venom killed a fowl in
thirty minutes. Nicholson affirms that the Russell’s viper can eject
as much poison in half a second as a cobra can in three seconds. But
if the viper be in a torpid condition, it might eject little or none.
A strong Daboia bit a feeble bull, which died; but two feeble Daboias
bit a strong bull, which recovered. These latter vipers were moulting,
and their functions were inactive&mdash;the bites feeble, perhaps. In fact,
the conditions are so many and great, that after all it is hazardous
to form any definite conclusion. Some notes of the effects on bitten
animals, taken at the Zoological Gardens while the snakes were being
fed, shall be faithfully recorded in the ensuing chapter.</p>

<p>With regard to the many drugs used in various countries for the cure of
snake-bite, it is curious to note that, as a rule, they are procured
from the most deadly plants. As ‘like cures like,’ so poison cures
poison. Most of them are powerful stimulants, in which lies their
chief virtue. Among them are <i>aristolochia</i>, <i>opium</i>, <i>ipecacuanha</i>,
<i>senega-root</i>, <i>guaco</i> or <i>huaco</i>, <i>asclepias</i>, <i>liatris</i>, <i>euphorbia</i>,
<i>polygala</i>, <i>ophiorrhiza</i>, etc.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_538" id="Page_538">[538]</a></span> A long list might be written. It is
noteworthy, too, that the natives of the countries in which these
plants are variously found, have strong faith in them, and indeed
use them with more or less of success. The early writers on America
entertained no sort of doubt as to the efficacy of the plants or
preparations used by the Indians. Purchas, in 1626, after describing
the ‘<i>Ibiracua</i>, which causeth by his biting the Bloud to issue thorow
all Parts of the Bodie, Eyes, Mouth, Nose, Eares,’ etc., says: ‘But
the Indians are acquainted with a certaine Herbe that will heal their
Woundes.’ Lawson, Berkeley, and Catesby tell us the Indians were
never without a remedy, which they carried about with them, but the
preparation of which differed in each tribe. Border Americans of the
present day, also, are never at a loss when snake-bitten, though the
most popular of modern remedies is whisky. (Not that this offers any
exception to the rule, that poison kills poison; the comic philosophy
being that whisky, as the stronger poison of the two, ‘goes in for
first innings, so to speak.’)</p>

<p>Some of the poisonous antidotal plants in South America are used in the
preparation of the celebrated <i>wourali</i> or <i>curare</i>, with which the
Indians poison their arrows. Snake-venom and pounded fangs are also
constituents of this, which is why the effect in the blood&mdash;as has been
shown in experiments&mdash;is similar to that of snake-bite. Some of the
tribes are said to acquire immunity from the most virulent snakes by
swallowing the potent herbs of their region. Inoculation with deadly
vegetable juices is another of their remedies; and Tschudi informs us
that after this inoculation, snake-bites are harmless for some time,
but that the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_539" id="Page_539">[539]</a></span> process has to be repeated. Sullivan has not much faith
in the process; nor has Dr. Stradling. But there is one undeniable
fact connected with the poisonous snakes of most countries, viz. that
death by them is comparatively rare; and only in India do we hear of
thousands dying annually. Dr. Carpenter, Humboldt, and, I believe,
other writers of equal weight, have suggested that the poisonous plants
used by native tribes, both internally and externally, may impart to
the person an odour which is repugnant to snakes; and if this be the
case, how would it be to institute compulsory inoculation among the
low-caste Hindoos, who are the chief sufferers in India? Or, could
not a few pariah dogs there be inoculated with the juice of some of
the native plants, such as the ‘earth gall’ of Malay (<i>Ophiorrhiza
mungos</i>), as the Indians of the Orinoco protect themselves with the
<i>Vejuco de huaco</i>? Should the process succeed with valueless animals,
it might afterwards be attempted in human beings. Perhaps already it
has been attempted, and it would be gratifying could I flatter myself
that it was through my suggestions of several years ago. Or I may be
only betraying my own ignorance of surgery and of the pharmacopeia in
suggesting it at all.</p>

<p>There are many popular vegetable ‘antidotes’ of the log cabin and the
rough border-clearings of America, but the ‘faculty’ form no high
estimate of them. Dr. Weir Mitchel tested some twenty or thirty plants
which owe their reputation to Indian traditions, but without success.
‘In the hands of science they failed.’ But then is there not always
some delay before the patient can reach the hands of science? It is
the prompt treatment, and having the remedies always ready,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_540" id="Page_540">[540]</a></span> that may
ensure success among the natives. Probably many a bitten person, if
alone in the desert, dies, and there are none to record his death.
Nevertheless we have good reason for believing that the natives do
learn how to manage deadly snakes or to avoid them. In South Africa
it is very rare to hear of a person dying of snake-bite; and the
natives go bare-footed there as much as in India. Some of the deadliest
serpents also are found in Africa. In Australia, where there is a
still larger majority of poisonous snakes (more than two-thirds of the
whole number), and also bare-footed natives, deaths are comparatively
infrequent. Krefft gives us a list which may be of interest to the
residents there, viz. the proportions of the venomous to the harmless
species of snakes:&mdash;</p>

<table id="td4" summary="td4">

 <tr>
  <td> </td>
  <td class="tdc"><span class="reduct">Venomous.</span></td>
  <td> </td>
  <td class="tdc"><span class="reduct">Harmless.</span></td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">New South Wales,</td>
  <td class="tdc">21</td>
  <td class="tdc">out of</td>
  <td class="tdc">30</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Victoria,</td>
  <td class="tdc">&nbsp;&nbsp;8</td>
  <td class="tdc">”</td>
  <td class="tdc">12</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">South Australia,</td>
  <td class="tdc">13</td>
  <td class="tdc">”</td>
  <td class="tdc">15</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">West Australia,</td>
  <td class="tdc">11</td>
  <td class="tdc">”</td>
  <td class="tdc">15</td>
 </tr>

 <tr>
  <td class="tdl">Queensland,</td>
  <td class="tdc">28</td>
  <td class="tdc">”</td>
  <td class="tdc">42</td>
 </tr>

</table>

<p class="p1">Whereas in India, including Ceylon, the venomous families are five
to the thirty-five innocuous ones. In India alone Günther describes
twenty families of snakes, out of which four only are venomous. When,
therefore, we read the annual statistics of India, and the enormous
death-rate, which suggest resolutions towards the extermination of
snakes, we may again hint that education must join hands with science
in order to find remedies. Europeans are seldom bitten; you might count
the numbers on your fingers in as many years. Dr. Edward Nicholson
has shown that while in twelve<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_541" id="Page_541">[541]</a></span> years (1860-1871 inclusive) only four
British soldiers died from snake-bite, thirty-eight died from the bite
of mad dogs; and he thinks it would be more beneficial to the community
to kill off some of the hordes of these dangerous animals which infest
the country during the summer months. Moreover, that ‘<i>in comparison
with preventible diseases and a percentage of the entire population,
snake-bites are sensational trifles</i>.’ He thinks the savage crusade
against snakes worse than useless, and argues that it would be better
to seek remedies for diseases that harm more Europeans in a week than
snakes do in a century. Others tell us that the number of deaths is
greatly exaggerated, and that many by violence or through fatalism and
barbarities are set down to snakes.</p>

<p>But to return to remedies, one would suppose that drugs or plants which
kill venomous snakes would be also cures for their bites. It is an old
belief that vipers contain in themselves an ‘antidote’ to their venom,
and hence the number of popular medicines prepared from their bodies.
Conversely, some of the deadly poisons of the pharmacopeia are death to
snakes. <i>Aristolochia</i> produces powerful effects on the African vipers;
the white ash (<i>Fraxinius Americanus</i>) is an equally rapid poison
to the rattlesnake, as Prof. Silliman proved. It is said that these
reptiles are never found in the vicinity of this tree. It was the white
ash which Oliver Wendell Holmes introduced into his story of ‘Elsie
Venner,’ as being destructive to <i>crotalus</i> life, and the novelist
wrote from his experience of its effects. Similar cases have been
recorded in the <i>Philosophical Transactions</i>. Pennyroyal, says Charas,
was held to the nose of a viper, ‘who by turning and wriggling laboured
hard to avoid it; and in half an hour’s<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_542" id="Page_542">[542]</a></span> time was killed by it. This
was in July, at which season these creatures are computed to be in the
greatest vigour of their poison’ (1657).</p>

<p>Another drug which is poison to a venomous snake is <i>tobacco</i>, within
the reach of most persons. This, among native remedies, has always been
in favour, and we have heard of its efficacy ever since ‘the weed’
was known to Europeans. Various species of tobacco and its allies
are indigenous to most tropical countries, and probably were in use
for both man and snake-bites long before civilised nations took such
comfort in smoking. In classic ages it was believed that human saliva
was fatal to vipers, and it is even affirmed that the Hottentots often
kill a puff adder by merely spitting upon it. One must infer from this
that their saliva is saturated with some drug which they chew; and
from classic authors we might discover that the practice of chewing
tobacco, opium, or other drugs obnoxious to snakes, was in use from
very early ages. Those classic authors who tell us that human saliva is
fatal to snakes had not studied snake nature enough to assign a reason
for this, though in all probability a reason did exist. ‘Man carries
more poison in his mouth than a snake,’ said an old Virginian writer,
alluding to <i>nicotine</i>. ‘He can poison a rattlesnake more quickly than
it can him.’ Nicholson states that it also rapidly affects a cobra, and
he recommends it, should you wish to destroy the snake uninjured: ‘You
have,’ he says, ‘but to blow into its mouth a drop or two of the oil
from a dirty tobacco-pipe.’</p>

<p>Two young men chopping wood together in Virginia espied a rattlesnake.
With a forked stick one of them held<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_543" id="Page_543">[543]</a></span> its head close to the ground,
keeping its body constrained with his foot, while his comrade took
from his own mouth a quid of tobacco, which he forced into that of the
snake. The reptile was then released, and had not crawled a couple of
yards before it was convulsed, swelling and dying within a short time.
Leaves of tobacco as a plaister, or chopped tobacco as a poultice,
are applied to a bite by the American backwoodsmen, after the custom
of the Indians; or finely chopped tobacco, mixed with moist gunpowder
and some pulverized sulphur, formed into a plaister, and laid on the
wound, and then set fire to. Tschudi, in his <i>Travels in Peru</i>, p. 434,
saw this remedy successfully applied by an Indian to his wife’s bitten
foot. A nausea-exciting drug was swallowed at the same time. With the
copper-head snake (<i>Ancistrodon contortrix</i>) it is equally efficacious.
These and rattlesnakes are said to be never found in tobacco fields.</p>

<p>Strychnine appears to have a similar effect to tobacco on snakes.
Fayrer found cobras extremely susceptible to the influence of
strychnine. An almost impalpable quantity caused a cobra to ‘twist
itself up in a rigid series of coils and die.’</p>

<p>A good many experiments have been tried by a subcutaneous injection
of strychnine into dogs and other animals, immediately after being
bitten, but without sufficient success to warrant the adoption of it
as an infallible remedy. In some of the cases, indeed, the deaths from
tetanus suggest the question, ‘Did the cats and dogs die from venom,
or from strychnine?’ As virulent poisons are administered in virulent
cases, how would it be to <i>swallow</i> strychnine in chemically-prepared
doses?</p>

<p>Carbolic acid is another drug which produces powerful<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_544" id="Page_544">[544]</a></span> effects, causing
the reptile to ‘double itself up in numerous folds, remaining as stiff
as if cast in metal.’ Creosote, also, snakes hate, Fayrer tells us, and
recommends that these two drugs may at least be of use in driving them
away from dwellings, as many of them have an objectionably domestic
disposition. A few drops of carbolic acid poured on the floor of their
cages kill venomous snakes in a very short time. A large <i>Bungarus</i>
died in ten minutes in this way.</p>

<p>Dr. Weir Mitchel approves of carbolic acid so far as to recommend
every backwoodsman to supply himself with a little of it, which is
easily portable and manageable in capillary tubes. In several of his
experiments with <i>crotalus</i> venom, carbolic acid applied to the wound
was attended with success. But it must be <i>done at once</i>. The whole
secret of cures&mdash;when cures can be effected at all&mdash;lies in promptness.
It is celerity on the part of the Indians which ensures their success.
In an instant, if his comrade be bitten, the savage is on his knees,
sucking the wound, grasping the limb firmly, or strapping it tightly
above and below the bite, knowing quite well the importance of checking
the circulation. He has his ‘poison pills,’ and tobacco in his pouch.
He explodes gunpowder on the wound and loses not an instant. Nor does
the victim lose heart. He submits with courage and confidence, and
in these lie another element of success. Many cases are on record
of persons being at death’s door through fear alone, when bitten by
a harmless snake, but recovering on being assured that there was no
danger. And other cases are well known where bitten persons have died
of fright and the depressing influences surrounding the accident, when
they might possibly have recovered.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_545" id="Page_545">[545]</a></span></p>

<p>And assuredly the remedies are generally so severe as to be in
themselves sufficiently terrifying. ‘No time for reflection;’ ‘no
mercy must be shown,’ declares Sir Joseph Fayrer, in describing the
incredible rapidity with which the venom inoculates the blood ‘in a
moment of time.’ Where a deep wound has been inflicted by a highly
venomous snake on a small animal, death has been known to occur in a
few seconds, especially if the bite were on a large vein or an artery.
Therefore if the bite be on a limb, to tie a ligature is the first
thing to be done. A thong of leather, a tape, a string, a cord, a
garment torn in shreds, anything that can be caught up, must at once
be tied round the limb. Every instant of delay increases the danger.
Incredible force must be used to tighten the ligature, which even with
a tourniquet or a stick to twist the cord to the utmost is scarcely
sufficient to completely stop the circulation in the fleshy part of
a limb. So tight as to cut into the flesh is frequently necessary.
In the case of a dog whose hind leg had been bitten, such amazing
force was required, in one of Fayrer’s experiments, that with the
strength of a pair of hands it was almost impossible to tighten the
ligature sufficiently to effect complete strangulation. In another of
his experiments a chicken had a ligature tightened round its thigh
‘with the greatest amount of tension that a man’s hand could exert.’
The poor chicken (already half dead with terror and pain, as one must
conjecture) was then bitten below the ligature by a cobra, but in spite
of the thorough strangulation of the limb, the fowl showed signs of
poison in twenty-three minutes, and in three-quarters of an hour was
dead. These two among other cases are cited to show that the mere<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_546" id="Page_546">[546]</a></span>
tying of a tape or a pocket handkerchief round a bitten limb is of very
little use, provided it is not drawn tight enough to almost cut into
the flesh. Yet this is only the first step; for if assistants are at
hand, let them tie a second or even a third such ligature above and
below the bite when possible, while whoever is best able to operate
must scarify the wound by cutting it across deeply, or by immediately
cupping, letting it bleed freely; ‘better still,’ says Sir Joseph, ‘cut
it out deeply and quickly.’ In the case of a finger or a toe, ‘amputate
instantly; for if once the venom is absorbed into the system, there
is but the slenderest chance of life.’ If the wound be in a fleshy
part, force a red-hot iron to the very bottom of it, and burn it out
to the depth of half an inch, or when excised fill it with gunpowder
and explode that, or force a live coal into it, or burn it out with
carbolic or nitric acid! Agonizing though the remedies be, they are
inevitable, should the bite be inflicted by one of the larger and
deadlier snakes in a part where absorption is rapid. ‘Do not relax the
ligament till the part be cold and livid,’ adds Fayrer.</p>

<p>Nor, when we look at the effects of a bite, can we wonder at the
severity of the remedies.</p>

<p>‘Vomiting black fluid,’ ‘bleeding at every orifice of the body,’ are
among the horrible sufferings at the time; an injured constitution and
hideous sores likely to break out afresh periodically in various parts,
may be some of the after consequences should the patient recover.</p>

<p>As the effect of the bite is depressing, the system must be kept up
with strong stimulants. Food is of little use, because the functions
are too feeble to digest it. But great faith is placed in stimulants.
Hence the popularity of ammonia,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_547" id="Page_547">[547]</a></span> which is quickly diffusible. The
venom exhausts the vital forces; therefore, excepting in the local
surgical treatment, all the best remedies are volatile and alcoholic
stimulants. Ammonia in the form of <i>eau de luce</i> has long been
approved, both taken internally and rubbed into the wound. Professor
Halford’s plan of subcutaneously injecting it has been very successful
in some cases of Australian snake-bites, and the popularity of this
mode has been seen in the large number of hypodermic syringes purchased
by persons in the bush. But the use of these requires surgical skill;
and awkward attempts by the laity have produced wounds which have been
prejudicial to the originator; for though it is said that some attempts
of this kind were made by Fontana about one hundred years ago, Halford
could not have been aware of that, since he claims to be the first who
ventured to throw ammonia directly into the blood. ‘Previously to my
experiments in 1868,’ he says, ‘it had never been thought possible to
throw ten or twenty minims of the strongest liquid ammonia directly
into the veins without killing the man on the spot.’<a name="FNanchor_145_145" id="FNanchor_145_145"></a><a href="#Footnote_145_145" class="fnanchor">[145]</a> He first
tried it on animals, and finding it successful, at length ventured
this ‘mode of treatment’ with human beings; since which other doctors
in Australia have also practised it. Still he does not claim for it
infallibility, though giving some cases in which the action of ammonia
on the blood and on the heart’s action produced rapid recovery in
persons apparently dying.</p>

<p>Any technical explanation must not be attempted by me; but those who
are interested in this subject will find Prof. Halford’s own accounts
in the <i>Medical Times</i> for 1873 and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_548" id="Page_548">[548]</a></span> ensuing years, also in his paper
‘On the Condition of the Blood from Snake-bite,’ 1867.</p>

<p>In India similar kinds of experiments were not attended with success;
leading to the conclusion that the Indian snakes were more deadly
than those in Australia. Climate, latitude, season, and many other
circumstances affect the virulence of snakes, as we may here repeat.
The ‘Brown’ or ‘Tiger snake’ (<i>Hoplocephalus curtus</i>), the ‘Black
snake’ (<i>Pseudechis porphyriacus</i>), <i>Hoplocephalus superbus</i>, and some
other of the larger venomous kinds <i>within the tropics</i> are thought to
be equal in virulence to the Indian ones of the same bulk in the same
season. Many of them erect themselves and distend their necks like the
<i>najas</i>.</p>

<p>And now for a few words about the most popular and perhaps most
attainable of all remedies&mdash;alcohol! No wonder the backwoodsman resorts
to this, which without any chopping off of fingers or toes, or personal
pyrotechnics, or other local tortures, deadens his sensibilities,
renders him unconscious of suffering, and sends him into a happy
obliviousness of danger. It is not a refined mode of treatment, nor one
that presents many opportunities of exhibiting professional skill; and
it is no doubt somewhat derogatory to admit that to become dead drunk
is an effective victory against snake venom! Other old and inelegant
remedies we hear of as practised by the Bushmen of South Africa,
and savage tribes elsewhere, but revolting in the hands of refined
practitioners. Deference to science and loyalty to the profession
demand some more elaborate means. Yet the efficacy of whisky or brandy
is admitted by all, and the pioneer who has not a doctor within miles
of him has his demijohn of whisky at hand.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_549" id="Page_549">[549]</a></span></p>

<p>During a sojourn in Iowa some years ago, when wild and uncleared lands
formed the ‘streets’ of the town in which I was staying&mdash;Lyons on the
Mississippi river, and as lovely a spot as artists and botanists can
wish to revel in&mdash;it was by no means an infrequent occurrence to hear
of rattlesnake bites. ‘What was done to the man?’ ‘Is he alive?’ were
questions naturally asked.</p>

<p>‘He drank a quart of raw whisky, and got dead drunk.’</p>

<p>Generally a quart had the desired effect&mdash;that is, of causing
intoxication. Persons unused to intoxicants might be affected by a less
quantity, but so violent is the combat between venom and whisky that a
large dose must be swallowed before any effects at all are produced. In
the southern and hotter States it was similarly used. Indeed, a planter
himself told me that Sambo would sometimes prick his hand or foot with
a thorn, and crying out ‘Rattlesnake!’ fall into well-assumed agonies,
in his preference for a spirituous somniferousness to cotton-picking.
But when the fraud was detected and less enticing remedies were
adopted, rattlesnake or copper-head bites became less frequent. I
heard of a man in Nevada, George Terhune, a teamster (I give his name,
having every reason to believe the truth of the story), who was bitten
in the hand by a rattlesnake while stooping to reach some water out
of a spring. The man was alone and far away from human habitations.
It was an instinctive and momentary business to first kill the snake
then rushing to his waggon, he drew the bung from a keg of whisky and
took a large draught of the contents. After swallowing as much as
he could, he took some tobacco from his pocket, saturated that with
whisky, and applied this poultice to his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_550" id="Page_550">[550]</a></span> hand. He then proceeded with
his team, drinking whisky at intervals until he reached a dwelling,
when he removed the poultice and found that the wound had turned green.
Applying another of the same kind, he resumed his journey and his
potent doses, reaching his destination next day ‘as sober as a judge,’
having imbibed enough ‘fire-water’ to intoxicate a dozen men with no
<i>crotalus</i> venom in their veins. The quantity sometimes swallowed under
such circumstances is utterly incredible.</p>

<p>Professor Halford describes a case of snake-bite near Melbourne,
in which two bottles of brandy were drunk without any symptoms of
intoxication; and another of a girl of fourteen, who, when bitten by
an Australian snake, drank three bottles without being intoxicated!
She recovered. ‘Alcohol has powerful attractions for oxygen,’ writes
Professor Halford, on the theory that the venom has produced foreign
cells in the blood, ‘so that if alcohol engage the oxygen absorbed by
the poison, the cells perish and recovery ensues.’ Others among the
ablest experimentalists similarly recognise the efficacy of alcohol.
Dr. Shortt of Madras says: ‘Bring the patient under the influence
of intoxication as speedily as possible. Make him drunk, and keep
him drunk, until the virus is overcome.’ Dr. Weir Mitchel found that
delicate women and young children under the influence of snake poison
could take ‘quarts of brandy without injury, and almost without
effect.’ One man brought to him&mdash;a man of temperate habits&mdash;took
one quart of brandy and half a pint of whisky, which ‘only slightly
intoxicated him for about four hours.’ Another man bitten in the throat
was cured at the end of twenty-four<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_551" id="Page_551">[551]</a></span> hours, during which time he had
had two quarts of whisky in one night, and renewed as the pulse fell,
besides red pepper and other stimulants.<a name="FNanchor_146_146" id="FNanchor_146_146"></a><a href="#Footnote_146_146" class="fnanchor">[146]</a></p>

<p>In South Africa, too, the alcoholic remedies seem to be successfully
adopted, so far as we may judge by occasional reports of them which
find their way into print. In the <i>Field</i> of January 14th, 1882, a
Mr. Walter Nightingale records that a boy of fifteen, bitten by a
puff adder, drank two bottles of brandy before it had any effect;
and a little girl two years old, bitten in the hand by a ‘horned
viper’ (which might have been a <i>Lophophrys</i> or <i>Vipera nasicornis</i>),
had administered to her brandy and milk in occasional doses without
any visible effects, until a whole bottle of brandy had been thus
swallowed! The child recovered; and the force of the argument seemed to
rest on the astounding quantity of strong spirit that could be taken
to overcome the venom without producing intoxication. Under ordinary
circumstances, a wine-glassful of brandy would have made either of
those children tipsy, yet the infant of two years did not reel under
a whole bottleful, and the boy of fifteen under two bottles full&mdash;a
quantity that would have killed many outright.</p>

<p>Yet whisky is not an ‘antidote’ chemically, any more than is ammonia,
or tobacco, or artificial respiration, which latter has been tried
with success by Drs. Vincent Richards and Lauder Bruton. So rapidly
destructive to every vital function is snake venom, that anything that
will keep life going until the poison is eliminated is desirable; and
what would themselves be poisons in other cases here act only as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_552" id="Page_552">[552]</a></span>
counterfoils. ‘A septic of astounding virulence,’ Weir Mitchel has
proved <i>crotalus</i> venom to be; and the scientific experimentalists on
the Oriental thanatophidia confirm his words as regard the <i>najas</i> and
vipers of their own regions. A subtle, malignant, mysterious fluid, to
which all animal life succumbs. Even vegetables are affected by it, as
Mitchel proved. Inoculated with it, they looked dead next day as if
scathed by lightning. So those old writers on Virginian serpents might
not have been so far wrong after all, so far as the injurious effect
of venom on a young tree; only they made a slight mistake in supposing
that the ‘thorny tail’ inflicted the mischief (p. 174).</p>

<p>It is not within the compass of this work to attempt to describe
in detail the many remedies which from time to time have enjoyed a
short-lived popularity; such as ‘snake stones,’ the ‘Tangore pill,’
and other preparations. Conventions have within the last twenty
years been held in India, in Australia, in America, and London; and
Commissioners from among our most distinguished M.D.’s have been
appointed to investigate all the reputed ‘antidotes’ and popular
remedies that could be got together. The names of Dr. Ewart, Dr. Lauder
Bruton, and Dr. Vincent Richards of the Indian Medical Department,
as associated with artificial respiration, must be familiar to many.
Dr. Shortt, of Madras, claims originality in the use of potash, <i>liq.
potassæ</i>, which both by the mouth and by injection has been attended
with success. He has recorded several cures by <i>liq. pot.</i>, ‘not as
miraculous, but as rational.’ He affirms that it has the property of
neutralizing the venom, and that brandy expedites it by carrying it
rapidly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_553" id="Page_553">[553]</a></span> through the system. Potash or soda plentifully applied to the
wound is a popular remedy also among the border pioneers of America,
who, on the theory that venom is of an acid nature, make frequent use
of alkalis. The child of a gentleman whom I knew in Virginia was bitten
on the foot by a rattlesnake; his whole body quickly exhibited the
symptoms of the poison. But the father was so confident of the success
of his own domestic treatment that he did not even send for a doctor.
‘<i>Saleratus</i>’ (used in cookery) was bound upon the bitten spot, and the
child was dosed with apple brandy until stupefied. Next day he was well.</p>

<p>From all the ‘recoveries’ above quoted, it may be said that the bites
could not have been very deep, or that the snakes could not have been
very virulent; and in the many hundreds of experiments tried in India
and elsewhere, the doctors have arrived at similar conclusions. <i>A full
charge of venom injected directly into the veins, should no remedy be
attempted, is almost certain to be fatal.</i> Within half an hour a man
might die from a vigorous <i>crotalus</i>, <i>fer de lance</i>, or large <i>elaps</i>.</p>

<p>It is important to impress this on the reader, lest from the cures
above cited, I appear to argue that snake-bite is not so serious an
affair after all. Notwithstanding that the South American Indians, in
the midst of the most deadly of the <i>Crotalidæ</i>, do fly confidently to
their <i>guaco</i> and their traditional remedies, they know so well when
there is no chance of recovery that they attempt no cures whatever.
Travellers tell us they lay themselves down to die when bitten by
certain snakes; probably they know that, from the position of the bite,
or<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_554" id="Page_554">[554]</a></span> the accidental lack of essential remedies, there is no hope for
them. They are said to resign hope when bitten by the little Peruvian
viper (<i>Echis ocellata</i>), in the very heart of the tropics, and as
deadly as the little <i>echis</i> of India. In every case the symptoms point
to the exhaustion of the nerve centres, and the rapid decomposition of
the blood.</p>

<p>The venom appears to be an indestructible fluid. Toxically it remains
unaltered whether boiled or frozen, or mixed with the strongest
corrosives. Diluted in water, alcohol, or blood, it is still equally
injurious. The blood of an animal killed by a bite, if injected into
the veins of another animal, kills that one also; and the blood of
the second one killed is similarly fatal to a third, and the third
to the fourth, and so on through a series of animals. Also so small
a quantity is fatal where no remedies are attempted, that a venomous
serpent can kill six or eight animals one after another; each one,
bitten in succession, succumbing more slowly, it is true, but still
dying at last. Fayrer found that no less than nine creatures could
thus be affected by one cobra. A dog, a pigeon, and seven fowls were
bitten one after the other: the dog, first bitten and receiving the
largest injection of venom, died in thirty-three minutes; a fowl, next
bitten, in three minutes; the third, in ten minutes; the fourth bitten,
in eleven; the fifth, in seventeen minutes; but the ninth bitten, a
fowl, when the poison gland was exhausted, recovered after a time. And
the same effect is seen in much larger animals than fowls. Fayrer also
tells of four men bitten in succession by one cobra, only the last one
bitten receiving treatment, and recovering-slowly after many days. The
facts prove<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_555" id="Page_555">[555]</a></span> the fatal confidence placed in snake-charmers, if further
proofs be needed. The four men, on payment of money, were to be taught
the ‘spells,’ <i>müntras</i>, etc., and, as they hoped, to be endowed with
curative powers. The professional ‘snake men’ bullied them into playing
with a cobra and irritating it, with the promise that no harm should
follow, even if they were bitten, which one of them very soon was,
falling senseless immediately, and dying within an hour. Not warned by
the utter failure of ‘charms’ to restore their comrade, the other three
permitted themselves to be bitten. The strongest charge of venom having
been expended in the first bite, the man next bitten did not fail so
rapidly, the third still more slowly, but both died the next day. When
the fourth was bitten, the police were informed of what was going on,
and they carried him off to the hospital, and the charmers to prison.
Thus is the death-rate swelled.</p>

<p>Though the venom may be swallowed with impunity by a thoroughly healthy
person, there is always danger of its being absorbed through the
delicate membranes of the throat and stomach. In cases of sore throat,
injured gums or lips, or internal maladies, the risk would be great,
of course. Animals killed by the venom are constantly eaten, Fayrer
states; and that the hungry natives eagerly carried off the fowls
upon which he had experimented. Since those celebrated experiments
at Florence by the ‘Florentine Philosopher,’ Redi, and those other
‘Knowing Physicians’ above two hundred years ago, the venom has been
swallowed by many. The great point of discussion then was to ascertain
the source of the ‘Mischiefs;’ whether they arose in the gall<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_556" id="Page_556">[556]</a></span> or the
‘Juyce of the Bag at the root of the Master Teeth;’ and Redi tasted
both the Gall and the ‘Spittle from the Bag’ in order to test this
great question, and found ‘the Gall sharp and the Spittle flat.’ As the
learned physicians of the nineteenth century have been again trying
effects, so did those ‘Knowing Physicians’ work out similar problems
in 1670, no doubt suggesting many things that have subsequently been
solved and perfected. One Francini was hard to convince that only a
tooth and not a demoniacal spirit inflicted the injury; whereupon,
to convince that unbeliever, they thrust a thorn and a pin into the
breast of a fowl, which betrayed no ill effects; but a splinter of wood
covered with ‘Spittle from the Bag’ killed a pigeon as quickly as the
‘Master Tooth.’ They showed, also, that a dissevered head was able to
bite, and its ‘Biting is as dangerous as when the Viper is entire.’
They proved other things, too numerous to recount; and particularly,
that venom was not injurious in a healthy stomach, the question from
which we have strayed to Florence.</p>

<p>Lately we have been led to think that it is something more than
harmless. Through the researches of Professors Selmi, Lacerda, Gautier,
and others, we learn that from the powerful peptic properties of
the venom it may become a valuable medicine. I think I am correct
in stating that a Dr. C. Hering of Philadelphia, when practising in
British Guiana some forty years ago, introduced the venom of our
celebrated Curucucu (<i>Lachesis mutus</i>) into medicine; and that since
then, serpent venoms have held an important place in the Homœopathic
Pharmacopeia. Already we have hinted at the digestive properties of
venom to the serpents themselves,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_557" id="Page_557">[557]</a></span> that neither masticate nor take
exercise otherwise to promote digestion; and there are those among
us who, not lacking energy so much as time, and whose busy brains
permit them but little leisure for either exercise or the unhurried
meal, may be glad by and by to resort to a poison pill to cure the
‘dyspepsia’ they thus bring upon themselves. Our American cousins will
hail with joy such a discovery. Perhaps even now they are anticipating
a prize medal at the next Great International Exhibition, for a
newly-invented ‘Extract of Bushmaster’ as the infallible remedy.
<i>American Bothropine</i>.&mdash;‘One drop of this extract in a wine-glassful of
water taken immediately after dinner ensures that meal being swallowed
in three minutes with impunity.’ Would not this deserve a gold medal in
these days when one man tries to do the work of three?</p>

<p>Drs. Lacerda and Netto of Brazil have proved that crotaline venom acts
as a solvent on hard-boiled egg and other albuminous substances,&mdash;that
it can, as it were, digest living tissues; and Dr. Stradling thinks
that this solvent or disintegrating power will in some measure
account for the intense local severity of a venomous snake-bite, ‘so
disproportionately wide-spread to the tiny punctures made by the
needle-like tooth.’</p>

<p>The excision of the fang does not check the function of the poison
gland any more than the extraction of a tooth will check the salivary
secretions in a human mouth, because (as was described in the chapter
on ‘Dentition’) there are other fangs coming forward and requiring
similar supplies.</p>

<p>One great value in experimental snake-bites by subcutaneous injection
is knowing which specific venom, or<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_558" id="Page_558">[558]</a></span> how much of it, produces certain
effects. But there is this to be said with regard to the creatures
operated upon, that the restraint, terror, and pain necessarily
inflicted before the venom is injected, must do a great deal towards
rendering that victim predisposed to succumb under ever so small a
dose; and in some cases 6, 8, or 10 drops of venom have been injected.
If terror and timidity act so strongly on a nervous human subject,
they must act similarly on such feeble, frightened creatures as fowls,
rabbits, and guinea-pigs, that are held, strapped down, and tortured by
ligaments and lancets.</p>

<p>Human beings may take courage in reflecting that in some of the
experiments under which animals have died, <i>in spite of immediate
remedies</i>, a far larger dose of venom has been injected than could
possibly pass through the fang in one normal bite. The virulence of the
venom in ever so minute a quantity has been proved sadly enough; yet
the possibility and hope of recovery are also evident.</p>

<p>‘As prevention is better than cure,’ those who run risk in the tropics
can guard against bites by wearing thick coverings to their feet and
ankles in the way of gaiters, leather boots; and denser materials for
clothing, in preference to those which the finely-pointed fangs can
easily penetrate. The cloth or leather may then receive the principal
charge of venom. Silk as a lining is good, and has the advantage of
coolness. Anything rather than bare feet. Then supplies of ammonia,
tobacco, carbolic acid, and strong tape are easily portable, and
plenty of good whisky, if the bearer can courageously <i>keep it for
emergencies</i>.</p>

<p>The mongoose of classic reputation must have a passing mention;
though it is now pretty well understood that this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_559" id="Page_559">[559]</a></span> little animal
owes its safety to its own bravery and adroitness, more than to any
supposititious herb to which it flies. Not but what instinct may
induce it to eat of the plants nature provides to animals as to men,
and as a cat eats grass when nature dictates a necessity for physic.
The mongoose has been known to die of snake-bite like other bitten
animals, though it certainly succumbs more slowly than many. Vitality
is stronger in some animals than in others. A rat is hard to kill;
and a cat will resist the poison as long as a dog of three times its
size. Then if mongooses feed on venomous snakes, they may enjoy in
themselves a sort of protective or prophylactic security. Their long
fur is also protective, leaving but few vulnerable points; and their
strong vitality enables them to escape and probably overcome the bite
if slight, or to hide away and die unseen.</p>

<p>The question of immunity from bites suggests yet one other point on
which some uncertainty exists, viz. Do snakes die of their own bites?
Dr. E. Nicholson only shall be quoted here, because I shall be able
to introduce some cases from personal observation in the ensuing
chapter, concluding this with just one foreign example which may be
relied upon. ‘According to my experience,’ says Nicholson, ‘the poison
of venomous snakes affects not only harmless ones, but also venomous
snakes of other genera.’ My own opinion is that they can kill not only
other snakes, but even themselves if the charge of venom be strong
enough. What has occasionally been seen in print of ‘snakes committing
suicide,’ is, I think, only from an instinct in the serpent to strike
at what injured it <i>where</i> injured. It feels a sudden pain and turns
to avenge the injury, striking itself on the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_560" id="Page_560">[560]</a></span> spot where the pain
directs. A case was recorded in a paper of a cobra having been struck
by a bullet, and instantly twisting round to bite itself on the spot,
and presently dying; and this was called ‘snake suicide.’ It died in
part perhaps from the bullet, and partly from its own venom, which
injected in anger would be powerful. Several similar cases have come to
my notice, where snakes have thus attacked themselves when the instinct
has been evidently to strike the <i>cause of pain</i>.</p>

<p>In vol. xxii. of <i>Nature</i>, p. 40, the case recorded by Mr. S. H. Wintle
from Tasmania will, I think, bear this explanation. He pinned a ‘black
snake’ (probably <i>Pseudechis porphyriacus</i>) to the ground with a forked
stick by the middle of the body; instantly coiling round the stick, the
angry snake turned and buried its fangs in itself, making the part wet
with viscid slime. Hardly had it done this than the coils relaxed; a
perceptible quiver ran through its body; in a few moments more it lay
extended and motionless, open mouthed and gasping, and in three minutes
was dead. Mr. Wintle examined the snake after death, and found the body
‘bloodless,’ as though the poison had destroyed the colouring matter.
He tried the blood on a mouse, which died in five minutes; and on a
lizard, which died in fourteen minutes.</p>

<p>If the saliva of an angrily-excited human being or a dog be more
injurious at one time than another, how much more so that of a venomous
serpent. The flow would be greater, the character more noxious. It
seems therefore a mere question of power or virulence, the greater over
the less. In some cases one serpent might kill another, in other cases
not.</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_561" id="Page_561">[561]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<div class="figcenter">
     <img src="images/ill-107.jpg" width="500" height="119"
         alt=""
         title="" />
</div>

<h2 class="p4">CHAPTER XXX.</h2>

<p class="pch"><i>NOTES FROM THE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS.</i></p>

<p class="drop-cap16">ARRANGING the following examples, not so much in chronological sequence
as in elucidation of special facts, I will first give some cases of
venomous serpents killing themselves and each other. My notes began
in 1872, after the interest so strongly awakened in Cheyne Walk,
Chelsea, when those tame snakes were fed to gratify our curiosity (see
Introduction).</p>

<p>Holland was then the keeper at the Reptile House of the London
Zoological Society’s Gardens, and had occupied this place upwards of
twenty years, gathering much experience and knowledge of reptilian
habits. Incidents known to him, when not witnessed by myself, may
therefore be received as trustworthy.</p>

<p>On Sunday, July 20th, 1873, a ‘River Jack’ (<i>Vipera rhinoceros</i>), from
West Africa, really did kill itself, though the act can scarcely be
called intentional ‘suicide.’ It was from dashing its head against
its cage either in anger or pain. Holland was of opinion that it had
been severely<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_562" id="Page_562">[562]</a></span> bitten by one of the others of the same kind in the
cage at the time; for he had known snakes to die from bites in this
way, sometimes from their own bites. On one occasion three Puff adders
(<i>Vipera arietans</i>) all died through quarrelling and biting each other.
One of the three survived ten days, the others dying sooner.</p>

<p>One day in April 1873 or 1874, on going to the Gardens, I was informed
that a water viper (<i>Cenchris piscivorus</i>) had been found in the tank
in its cage, presenting a very unusual appearance, and enormously
swelled. On going his rounds that morning, the keeper observed it, and
touching it with his iron rod, he discovered that it was quite dead.
He said these vipers frequently quarrel, biting each other and causing
this great inflation of the body, as if blown out by wind. The vitality
of this species is very strong. From such bites the inflation is
sometimes only temporary, and they recover, but not always. One of them
lived a long while with a broken back. It was endeavouring to escape
by the sliding door, which was raised while the keeper was making some
arrangements. The movements of the reptile were so swift that Holland
was obliged to suddenly drop the slide; and though he succeeded in
partly pushing back the snake, it got caught and was jammed under it,
completely dislocating its spine. But it did not appear to suffer very
much, he said, and entirely recovered from the injury.</p>

<p>Some ‘viperine snakes’ (named from their aspect, but not really
venomous) not only bit each other, but killed and swallowed each other.</p>

<p>Several cases of cobras injuring each other and themselves are on
record at the Gardens. On one occasion a cobra<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_563" id="Page_563">[563]</a></span> got loose, and, as may
be supposed, created considerable terror. While being caught, it turned
and bit itself, burying its fangs in its own flesh. I could not learn
exactly the spot where it wounded itself; but it was no doubt where the
hooked rod, or the snake tongs, had been offendingly applied.</p>

<p>A couple of cobras were presented by Sir Joseph Fayrer. One of them
bit the other repeatedly, and in so many places that it was ‘torn
to pieces,’ in the language of the keeper. ‘The body was all over
sores.’ Notwithstanding this, it was several weeks dying. This painful
spectacle did not fall under my own observation, happily, but there is
no reason to doubt the occurrence.</p>

<p>Next to the rattlesnakes few are more nervously timid than cobras;
only, while the former displays fear by a shrinking retreat, a cobra
is aggressive, inasmuch as it raises itself with a threatening aspect
and distended hood. It is on account of their extreme timidity that the
cobras’ cages are screened with painted glass at the lower part, or
the reptiles, in aiming at offending spectators, would be continually
dashing their heads against the front, to their own detriment. In this
manner snakes wound themselves very seriously, producing various mouth
diseases.</p>

<p>Before writing another word of what, as a student, I have witnessed at
the Gardens, I must here affirm that any distressful occurrences are
not related to gratify a morbid curiosity in those who read only to be
amused, but to enable other students to acquire a better insight into
ophidian habits and physiology, and as a duty which I have set myself
to accomplish&mdash;a duty which has cost much moral<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_564" id="Page_564">[564]</a></span> courage to carry
out, and which demands, as I now discover, an equal amount of moral
courage to commit to writing. A good deal is painful, if not revolting;
therefore I would commend the perusal of this chapter only to those
who, as naturalists, wish to be informed on these subjects.</p>

<p>‘Lip fungus,’ gum boils, canker, and abscesses are among the
mouth diseases to which snakes in confinement are subject, and
for these, very delicate surgical operations have sometimes to be
performed,&mdash;‘very delicate’ often, by reason of the dangerous character
of the patient, and in consideration for the operator as much as for
the sufferer. The keepers have sometimes to lance the gums, sometimes
to wash the sores! One very venomous patient was so covered with sores
that the keeper’s only resource was to throw the lotion all over the
reptile.</p>

<p>‘Why not let the odious serpent die, or kill it at once?’ some will
exclaim. Well, in the first place, many snakes cost large sums of
money to purchase; secondly, humanity as well as economy demands that
their sufferings should be allayed wherever possible. And in return,
they frequently reward such care by recovering and entertaining the
visitors, climbing with renewed vigour about their cages.</p>

<p>On the other hand, so tenacious of life are some snakes, that they
might survive as disgusting objects a long while&mdash;not in a state to
be exhibited at all, but only to be an additional care and trouble to
those whose duty it is to attend to them. One very astonishing instance
of tenacity of life must be introduced. It was in a rattlesnake which
would not feed, and must have greatly suffered in some way, whether
physically or from nervous terror cannot be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_565" id="Page_565">[565]</a></span> determined; but the
reptile struck its head so repeatedly against the side of its cage,
that, in the keeper’s words, ‘it completely smashed it.’ At last it
died, its head one mass of putrid sores; and in that state it had
sustained life for many months. It had eaten nothing for ten months.</p>

<p>It must be owing to the excessive and nervous timidity of snakes, that
some of them reject food for so long a time during the first months of
their captivity. I think for even more than two years snakes have been
known to fast, and to recover their appetite afterwards. So strong a
disinclination for food do cobras show, when first brought that it is
of no use whatever to put mice into their cages. Now and then, if no
one is near them, they will partake of a mouse or a sparrow, but never
until they become somewhat reconciled to their surroundings.</p>

<p>Almost equally alarmed and irreconciled was the Hamadryad, which is
closely allied to the cobras. When first brought to the Gardens in
the spring of 1875, he did little else than suspiciously watch for
some weeks. With his head elevated in front of the glass, and his hood
expanded, he made a dash whenever any one approached or stopped to
look at him, and ate nothing for many days. Within a year these fears
gradually subsided, and he became so tame as to watch for the keeper
instead of for supposed enemies, raising himself to the roof of his
cage, and remaining close to the little trapdoor at the top, awaiting
the snake which, as he had already learned, made its appearance through
there for dinner. Much caution is requisite in feeding him; for though
he does not now display spite or anger, once let his head find egress
through that little trapdoor<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_566" id="Page_566">[566]</a></span> when raised, he, one of the most venomous
snakes in existence, would be through in a moment, creating a stampede
indeed among the visitors, to say nothing of danger both to them and to
himself. He well recognised a change of guardianship when poor Holland
was compelled from ill-health to resign his place; and not even yet,
in spite of the kindest treatment, will he trust his present keeper
as he trusted Holland. During the interregnum and frequent change of
attendants, his nerves were tried in a manner that he has been slow to
recover.</p>

<p>The Hamadryad’s appointed diet is one ring snake per week; but ‘Ophi,’
as we now call him, is occasionally required&mdash;and with no sacrifice of
his principles either&mdash;to eat an extra snake to satisfy the curiosity
of some distinguished visitor. Sometimes, too, colubers are plentiful,
and two small ones are not too much for his ten or twelve feet of
appetite. This splendid serpent has rewarded care by remaining in
perfect health, and growing several feet. He was between eight and
nine feet long when he came, and is now not far short of twelve, and
proportionately larger in circumference. Sometimes during winter,
when ring snakes are scarce, ‘Ophio’ is compelled to fast; for, as
related p. 62, he is not to be tempted with other food. During the
first year of his residence in the Gardens, the supply was good, and
he ate no less than eighty-two fellow-creatures before the winter was
well over. Towards spring, however, the supply ran short, and only two
more remained for him. He had now fasted two entire weeks, and looked
hungry and eager. The keeper offered him a guinea-pig, at which he
took great offence, spreading<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_567" id="Page_567">[567]</a></span> his hood and hissing angrily for a long
while. Eggs he declined, also a lizard and a rat, in great disgust. In
India the Ophiophagi are said to feed on lizards and fish occasionally,
but <i>our</i> Ophiophagus preferred to fast. At last one of the two ring
snakes was produced, and Ophio was to be regaled. It was the 31st of
March 1876, and he had been a denizen of the Gardens just one year. My
notebook informs me that it was a lovely, soft spring day, and that
Ophio was quite lively. He had rejected frogs on his own account, but
in the uncertainty of more ring snakes arriving, he was now decoyed
into eating half a dozen. Holland contrived that the snake destined for
his dinner should answer the purpose of a feast, and had allowed it to
eat as many frogs as it chose. Like the poor wretch who, doomed to the
gallows, is permitted to fare sumptuously the last morning of his life,
the ring snake ate three frogs, by which the Ophiophagus was to derive
chief benefit; he, all unconscious of the cause of his victim’s unusual
plumpness, swallowing him speedily.</p>

<p>Soon after this Ophio doffed his winter coat entire, and having again
fasted for ten days, was at once rewarded by the last remaining ring
snake in a similarly plethoric condition, namely, with three more frogs
inside him. Now and then during the winter months the scarcity of
ring snakes has compelled the sacrifice of some far rarer colubers to
Ophio’s cannibal tastes. And yet each year we hear of hundreds of ring
snakes being ruthlessly killed in country districts, while at great
cost and trouble others are purchased or brought from the Continent for
the Hamadryad’s sustenance. Lord Lilford, one of the Ophidarium’s best<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_568" id="Page_568">[568]</a></span>
patrons, sometimes sends presents of game in the shape of ring snakes
to the Hamadryad.</p>

<p>While watching this snake-eater over his dinner, one is struck with the
remarkable tenacity of life exhibited in the victim, or the slow action
of the venom if poisoned in the first grasp. The Ophiophagus seizes it
anywhere, that is, at whichever part happens to come first, and then,
after holding it quietly for a time, works his jaws up to the head
in the usual hand-over-hand, or ‘jaw-after-jaw’ fashion, invariably
swallowing the snake head first. On one occasion when I watched
attentively, Ophio, having seized a ring snake by the middle, held it
doggedly still for one quarter of an hour, while the lesser snake did
its very best to work its way out of the jaws, and also to fetter his
captor by twirling itself over his head and coiling round his neck.
This continued while Ophio, with his head and neck raised, remained
motionless, and after the quarter of an hour commenced to work his
jaws up towards the head of the ring snake, which, as more and more of
its own body was free for action, twirled itself about, and at length
coiled its tail round the bit of branch nailed into the cage.</p>

<p>Persistently, like a sailor making his vessel fast to the windlass, the
ring snake lashed as much of himself as was free round the branch a
foot off, and so pulled and pulled till he looked in danger of severing
himself in two. Meanwhile Ophio, slowly but surely advancing, caused
its head and neck to disappear, grasping tightly with his venomous
jaws, as if he would say, ‘We’ll see who is master.’ It was a close
tussle, so firmly did the little coluber retain his hold on the ‘tree;’
but as the upper part of him was gradually drawn<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_569" id="Page_569">[569]</a></span> into those unrelaxing
jaws, he by degrees gave way, and by and by was gone.</p>

<p>Not far short of an hour was occupied in this meal, during which the
victim showed no signs of being poisoned, nor were his coils round the
stump relaxed in the slightest degree, till Ophio reached the tail. The
ring snake is not a constrictor, yet he thus tied himself round the
tree by the coils of his tail.</p>

<p>One more singular case of tenacity of life must be recorded. A ring
snake had been caught in the usual way, and the usual struggle ensued
between captor and captive. Coluber, with its head tightly gripped in
the jaws of his enemy, had still all the rest of himself at liberty
and in full activity, and after wriggling a violent protest, he coiled
what was left of himself so closely round the neck of his persecutor
that the latter made little or no progress with his dinner for a time.
He seemed to be deliberating how to proceed next, and asking, ‘What is
the meaning of this?’ then shook his head, lowered it to the shingle,
and tried to rub off the coils. The only result thus achieved was that
the extreme end of coluber’s tail was loosened for a moment, but only
to coil afresh round Ophio’s jaws, which nevertheless slowly and surely
advanced.</p>

<p>For nearly an hour the progress was very slow; but when the ring snake
was all swallowed except a few inches of tail, these became so tight a
muzzle that Ophio in turn was the victim. Shaking his head and vainly
endeavouring to free his jaws of this muzzle, a minute or two elapsed,
during which he seemed to suffer some discomfort, when suddenly his
mouth opened widely, and out crawled Natrix, apparently<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_570" id="Page_570">[570]</a></span> none the worse
for this temporary entombment. He had turned round when two or three
feet from daylight, and come back to see the world once more. But it so
happened that Ophio closed his jaws in time over the few inches of tail
which still remained between them. Nor did he once relax his grasp of
this, but quickly and patiently began to work his way up to the head
and recommence his meal, and this time with better success. An hour
and a quarter I watched, nor was any evidence of poison seen, so as to
reduce the powers of the bitten snake for bitten it must have been in
those prolonged and forcible grasps.</p>

<p>In these conflicts one could but observe a dogged stupidity on the part
of the venomous snake, who, had he but brought coils to his aid, might
have simplified matters so easily. The little Heterodons and even the
Lacertines often assist themselves with coils in managing their prey,
though not themselves constrictors but the venomous ones have not the
slightest notion of helping themselves in this way, as if confident
that in time their venom would do its work. In self-protection,
however, we have seen that a rattlesnake can coil, p.394.</p>

<p>This Ophiophagus has caused to vanish, on an average, not far short
of a hundred snakes per annum since his arrival in England, say seven
hundred in all. In his native haunts, actively moving and climbing
amidst plenty of other snakes, one might multiply the consumption by
at least three, and give to the Hamadryads the credit of assisting
Government in exterminating snakes to the extent of 300 each per annum.
These snakes, therefore, should be much prized by the Government
snake-exterminators, and in reward for services<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_571" id="Page_571">[571]</a></span> rendered, have their
own lives spared. They are not very common, nor very obtrusive; and we
do not hear of so many deaths laid to their charge as to cobras and
Bungari. So long as you do not molest their nests or their young, they
get out of your way; but for all that, they might be turned to very
good account as snake consumers.</p>

<p>So might some in Australia and in South America, and elsewhere; for
although this especial Hamadryad usurps the name of ‘Snake-eater,’
there are Ophiophagi in many parts of the world. They are chiefly
<i>Elapidæ</i>. Probably on account of the small head and slender form of
these snakes, a fellow-creature is more convenient to swallow than an
animal all joints and elbows, and fur-covered. Many snakes are also
involuntarily or rather unintentionally cannibals, as in the case of
the Tropidonoti, when two seize the same frog, or the python swallowing
Geoptyas (p. 38). In such cases the swallower does not first seize his
comrade with the intention of devouring him; but both having hold on
a meal which neither chooses to relinquish, it is a mere question of
which one first reaches the jaws of the other, and which pair of jaws
happens to be most widely extended. A case is recorded in <i>Nature</i>,
March 8th, 1877, of a Mr. L. Heiligbrodt in Texas capturing an
unusually thick ‘Water moccasin’ (<i>Ancistrodon pugnax</i>), and on opening
it finding a large ‘Copper-head’ (<i>Ancistrodon contortrix</i>), recently
swallowed.</p>

<p>This was ‘the only case on record,’ for it is very unusual for the
<i>Crotalidæ</i> to eat each other; and very probably, in this instance, the
cause was a mutual meal. ‘Moccasins’ (<i>Tropidonoti</i>) at the Gardens
sometimes have such a hard grip on each other as to fetch blood. I
once saw two of these<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_572" id="Page_572">[572]</a></span> rearing themselves high in their scuffle for
the unhappy frog of which both had equal hold. The keeper was obliged
to administer corporeal reproof, which caused one of them to let go,
when the other swallowed the frog almost at one gulp, as you might
swallow an oyster. Nor do they invariably turn the frog round to
swallow it head first. This is done if the frog is likely to escape.
These so-called ‘moccasins’ are of a very pugnacious disposition. One
of them once startled me by dashing at me through the glass, with
such violence that I thought the glass would have been broken. I was
doing nothing whatever to alarm it, and I knew the snakes quite well.
But in that angry mood its aspect seemed so changed, that I asked the
keeper if that were a new snake and a venomous one, which it certainly
resembled at the moment. I may here mention that Professor Brown Goode
(who presided over the ‘American Science Convention on Snakes’) once
caught a <i>Tropidonotus fasciatus</i> in Florida, which was so like the
‘dreaded moccasin’ (<i>Ancistrodon piscivorus</i>), that not until he had
examined the mouth and found it was harmless could he identify it.
These <i>Tropidonoti</i> have been known to take raw meat occasionally; so
has the Xenodon, and so has a rattlesnake at the Gardens. Indeed, of
one of these the keeper said, ‘It will eat any dead thing;’ and he
found it convenient sometimes to give it a rat or a guinea-pig which a
neighbouring snake had killed by poisoning, but not eaten. The Crotalus
in such cases imbibed some foreign venom with his dinner. One Crotalus
at the Gardens would eat only rats, others prefer guinea-pigs.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_573" id="Page_573">[573]</a></span></p>

<p>‘Look at that rat!’ exclaimed a lady to her friend, when the keeper
gave the rattlesnake a good-sized guinea-pig.</p>

<p>‘I think it must be a rabbit; it is too big for a rat,’ returned the
friend.</p>

<p>Before they could decide this zoological question, it lay dead. The
rattlesnake struck it and left it. It gave one gasp, fell over, and
in half a minute was dead. Another day a guinea-pig was six minutes
dying, but on this occasion the rattlesnake had expended some of its
venom in angrily striking the iron rod with which the keeper was moving
something in the cage. When the guinea-pig seemed to be dead, the
Crotalus, after eyeing and smelling it all over, that is, investigating
it with its tongue as if to be assured, was about to take it, when the
little animal had one slight spasm more, and the snake darted back its
head and rapidly retreated. Watching them as I have done for years,
I am still undecided whether excessive timidity or their low order
of intelligence is paramount in the rattlesnakes. They are so slow
and sluggish of movement, that those accustomed to them hold them in
tolerable contempt. I have seen Holland watch his opportunity, open
the cage, and put his hand in to snatch away a guinea-pig to give to
another snake if the Crotalus did not want it.</p>

<p>‘They always coil before striking,’ is often said. They certainly take
time to think about an attack and to make ready by having plenty of
coils&mdash;slack rope, as it were&mdash;at their command, in order to reach
their aim, the ‘always coiling’ not truly meaning that they wind
themselves round and round as a sailor coils a rope, with their head
in the middle. The ‘coiling’ has been thus described by persons<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_574" id="Page_574">[574]</a></span> with
‘unscientific imaginations;’ but having its head in the centre of such
a coil, the snake would <i>not</i> easily reach its object. Often the coils
are like those of ‘Totsey’ when taking her choice of a bird, having
loose folds near the head, which is always <i>forward</i> in readiness for
the attack.</p>

<p>Excellent opportunities of observing the relative venoms present
themselves in zoological collections&mdash;not only the degrees of poison
seen in the different serpents, but the effects produced by one serpent
at different times. Of those species when in full vigour there is no
doubt but that the South American rattlesnake (<i>Crotalus horridus</i>) is
one of the most virulent. Sometimes this species will strike at a young
rabbit or a guinea-pig, and death is almost instantaneous. One such
instance was observed when a rattlesnake struck a guinea-pig on the
head, the little animal falling as if shot, and in such a flash of time
that Holland examined it to ascertain the cause, and ‘its brains had
turned quite green directly.’</p>

<p>‘A new rattlesnake’ was introduced in the autumn of 1873. Not new to
science, but this, I regret to find, is all that my notebook records
in heading some observations made September 26th of that year, ‘a very
warm day’ for the season. A guinea-pig was put into the cage, when
the snake (I <i>think</i> it was <i>Crotalus durissus</i>) approached its head
closely and stealthily till quite near to the little animal, shrinking
back at the slightest movement on the part of the guinea-pig, which sat
staring and blinking in a corner. Each time the snake recoiled, even
at a blink, it kept its eyes fixed in alarm on the piggy, who stupidly
returned the gaze, not knowing what to make of the snake or of the
people so<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_575" id="Page_575">[575]</a></span> close to him. By and by the snake, regaining courage, again
ventured nearer, and again when nearly close started back at a slight
movement of the guinea-pig. Three times a similar approach was made
before the snake ventured to strike, betraying its extreme caution and
timidity. As soon as struck, the guinea-pig was convulsed, and falling
on its side was dead in three minutes.</p>

<p>Rats do not succumb to the poison nearly so quickly as rabbits,
guinea-pigs, and birds.</p>

<p>Another guinea-pig struck by a rattlesnake immediately fell over on its
side, and died, panting hard, in <i>about</i> three minutes. One could not
discern the precise moment of its last gasp; but in this case there
were no convulsive jerkings of the limbs.</p>

<p>The rattlesnakes always strike and then recede quickly, keeping a
stealthy watch over their prey until it is perfectly still, often
much longer. Puff adders and some others of the African vipers,
on the contrary, retain their hold after biting. Cobras sometimes
strike and retain their hold, and sometimes let the prey go and wait
for it to die. On a small creature the effect of Puff-adder venom
is instantaneous; and a remarkable difference is observable between
the effect on a timid victim and on a rat. One of these adders ate a
sparrow alive August 20, 1874, that is, struck and held it, swallowing
it so quickly that it had not time to die. A sparrow is, however, a
very small prey for so large a serpent. Another Puff adder, about to
cast its coat, bit a guinea-pig, which was rapidly convulsed, as with
spasms, accompanied by sharp jerkings of the limbs for nearly five
minutes, when it became motionless. In this case the charge of venom<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_576" id="Page_576">[576]</a></span>
might be feeble. In September of that year a Puff adder (I think the
same as the last named) bit a rat, which at first ran about trying
to escape, going close to the viper, as if unconscious of an enemy,
and apparently unharmed during the first minute. Then it became aware
of pain, and began to lash its tail, whisking it round and round in
a frantic manner. Then one of its hind legs kicked out, probably the
bitten limb, jerking violently for a time, and the rat lay helpless
thus for about two minutes. In four minutes from the bite it gasped,
and continued to gasp harder and harder for nearly three minutes more.
It then bled at the mouth. The Puff adder then bit it again, when,
after two or three more minutes, it leaped violently in convulsions
from the effect of the second bite. The convulsions became gradually
less; but fully twenty minutes elapsed, in spite of a double charge of
venom, before the rat was dead. In all similar cases I noticed that
rats were very tenacious of life. A guinea-pig has been killed in five
seconds from the bite of a Puff adder.</p>

<p>On the same day, a ‘nose-horned viper’ (<i>Vipera nasicornis</i>) struck a
rabbit, which immediately ran and started spasmodically, panting as if
astonished and wondering what had hurt him. Then he leaped into the
well at the back of the cage, but in that short moment was too feeble
to crawl back again. He attempted to run, but sank quickly. Being out
of sight, it was impossible to state the exact moment in which it died,
but the whole was in less than two minutes. These vipers are no doubt
intensely virulent. Another day one of them with a bad swelled face
from abscess bit a guinea-pig, which in thirty seconds fell over on its
side. It<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_577" id="Page_577">[577]</a></span> squeaked convulsively the moment it was bitten, and several
times afterwards. It lay motionless for half a minute, appearing to be
dead, but gave one slight start afterwards, and was perfectly still
before three minutes expired.</p>

<p>In stating these periods of time decisively, it is by the watch. When I
did not keep my watch in hand, I do not state the time so positively.</p>

<p>Between those larger African vipers, when all are in full vigour, there
would appear to be not much difference in power of bite. A ‘River Jack’
(<i>Vipera rhinoceros</i>) struck a guinea-pig, holding it in his mouth till
dead, which was in less than two minutes. Poor little piggy struggled
convulsively the first few moments as if in pain; then only gasped as
if labouring to breathe, but soon was insensible.</p>

<p>The poison of <i>Cenchris piscivorus</i>, though a much slighter snake,
seems as potent as that of the rattlesnake. One of these struck
a guinea-pig&mdash;the action being so swift that some of us who were
attentively observing were not sure that the animal had been bitten
at all, except from the instantaneous effects, the guinea-pig leaping
frantically and dashing itself about for a few seconds; then it sank
gasping heavily, and kicking convulsively, until in a few minutes
life was extinct. Some of the creatures live ten minutes, others not
ten seconds. I was glad to observe that in most cases insensibility
rapidly overcame them. And without exception, it was observable that
of the two&mdash;the snake or the destined food&mdash;the first named was by far
the most alarmed, or ‘charmed.’ In the actions of the little creatures
thrown into the cages, there was a fearless, unsuspicious freedom, when
once they had recovered<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_578" id="Page_578">[578]</a></span> the surprise of finding themselves suddenly
there instead of in a dark box. Rabbits hop about and over the snakes,
and then sit up and clean themselves. Birds plume themselves and look
about to see what they can pick up, perching upon the snake as if it
were a log of wood. Rats run hither and thither to find something to
eat, and then wash <i>their</i> faces. Many of the little animals run over
the snakes, quite unconscious of their being live enemies, or force
their noses under them, to the evident alarm and discomfort of the
Ophidian, should he be disinclined to move. Sometimes, if faint and
languid, and huddled together in a corner, it is because they&mdash;the
victims&mdash;are oppressed with the closeness of the cage and the vitiated
air, but quite apart from any ‘spell’ or magnetic influence. They may
stare at the serpent that is staring at them, and as they stare in
alarm at the people, but they have never seen a python, a puff adder,
or a rattlesnake before in their lives, and have not the slightest idea
that they are going to be eaten by one. And for this reason you so
often see the startled and surprised look the moment of being struck.
Thus far they have been unconscious of danger; and when a shock does
come, it is incomprehensible, because instinct does not guide them
under the circumstances.</p>

<p>On account of the excessive timidity of cobras, it is seldom that they
can be observed when feeding, which is frequently in the night, or
‘when no one is looking,’ to repeat the keeper’s words; but the little
Indian viper (<i>Echis carinata</i>) should not be omitted in these notes,
because there is difference of opinion regarding its virulence. Being
one of the smallest vipers, only from sixteen to eighteen<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_579" id="Page_579">[579]</a></span> inches in
length, one would argue extraordinary power from effects seen. A friend
who had resided in India expressed great astonishment on hearing it
said that a cobra was supposed to be more deadly than this one, known
as the ‘carpet viper’ or the ‘whip snake,’ which, he said, could kill
a man in a half-hour, and that he had seen men thus die. ‘If a cobra
bite you, you have at least four or five hours to live,’ he said;
‘but half an hour for the whip snake, and you are a dead man.’ The
individual brought to the Gardens in 1875 died the day after it gave
birth to three young ones. While alive it ate nothing, and, as it was
then thought, because it had not its natural food, Dr. Günther having
discovered nothing but <i>scolopendræ</i> in the specimens which he had
examined. Now it would be interesting to discover whether, as Aristotle
affirmed, the bites of all venomous animals are more pernicious if
they have devoured each other, or if snakes have devoured scorpions,
and whether the toxic powers of the little Echis are aggravated by the
venomous food it evidently prefers at home. ‘In India is a certain
little serpent for the bite of which alone the natives have no remedy,’
said Aristotle; and one can scarcely err in deciding this to be the
Echis, being not only the smallest venomous snake there, but the only
viper, except Russell’s viper, a much larger snake.</p>

<p>Only twice could I observe the toxic effects of the <i>Echis carinata</i> at
present (1882) in the collection; both cases being in hot weather. It
has so far conformed to circumstances in England, as to consent to dine
on small white mice, failing scorpions. In the first case it struck
the mouse savagely as soon as it was dropped into the cage, and the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_580" id="Page_580">[580]</a></span>
mouse died in less than two minutes. Echis approached it stealthily
and timidly, but having at last got courage to seize it, ate it very
quickly; and as the snake moved and dragged it, the mouse appeared
to be quite stiff in that short time. On the second occasion, it bit
a mouse on the leg, and it was five minutes dying. At first only the
leg was paralyzed; then a spasm followed, and the mouse fell over and
lay extended flat and still as if dead; but presently a spasmodic
convulsion followed. It again appeared to be dead, and the little viper
approached; but on a very slight spasm receded swiftly, not once taking
its eyes off the mouse, which was dying slowly. The viper was at least
five minutes swallowing this, and as if it did not much care about it.
One must argue, therefore, that the charge of venom had been scantily
expended, as the difference between this and the previous victim was
remarkable. Echis poison has been seen to take instantaneous effect.
The small <i>Vipera atropos</i> from the South African mountains is also
astoundingly virulent. One in the collection in 1881 struck a mouse as
soon as it arrived, and death occurred in fifty seconds by the watch.
A large store of poison must have accumulated during its journey and
since its previous meal.</p>

<p>One more African snake must be mentioned before I conclude the painful
duty of describing the inevitable&mdash;though happily short&mdash;sufferings
inflicted by venomous serpents.</p>

<p>Three young <i>Najas</i>, the well-known <i>Ring Halsschlange</i> of South
Africa, were brought in the spring of, I think, 1877. They were very
black and very shy, and for a long while one could see nothing more
of them than three little heads<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_581" id="Page_581">[581]</a></span> in a row peeping out from under
their blanket, and watching with their large round black eyes, but
vanishing like a shot at your approach. ‘They cut away the moment you
go near them,’ said the keeper. When they did give us an opportunity
of looking at them, we found that one was quite black, and another
was speckled with white; they erected their heads and distended their
necks defiantly. Their eyes had a white rim round them, and were bright
and undeniably beautiful, even though belonging to a venomous snake.
Whether because they were young and inexperienced, or naturally stupid,
I could not decide but of all the snakes none ever went so awkwardly
to work in feeding, or put their victims to such unnecessary torture,
as did these ridiculous little <i>Najas</i>. The feeding observations were
made in August, when they had grown considerably, and had become
accustomed to their home. They seemed to bite the prey anywhere without
much effect, sometimes retaining it in their mouth, and at other times
beginning at once to eat it. One frog was ten minutes from the time
it was struck until it was swallowed, and for no reason beyond the
feeder’s awkwardness. The little snake began at a hind leg, and not
being able to get the frog into its mouth, put it down and began again
at the side, but with no better result, the legs being in the way. Then
he gave it up and let the frog go, and presently his comrade struck
the half-dead thing and took five minutes to eat it. One might decide
from this that frogs were not their natural food; but with very young
sparrows the same mismanagement was observable. The bird was awkwardly
bitten on the tip of the wing, and the snake held it helplessly for
a quarter of an hour while the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_582" id="Page_582">[582]</a></span> bird was struggling violently. Not
getting good hold, the snake put it down and began again, so that the
poor little sparrow was twenty minutes in being swallowed, gasping to
the last, and evidently only very feebly poisoned. One of the Najas bit
his companion, and held on for about ten minutes, and for no reason
whatever that one could discern. In no other venomous snakes have I
seen such prolonged suffering caused by such stupidity or bungling
as in those young African ‘Ring Hals.’ Their fangs are, however,
exceedingly short, as I found on examining a dead one, and this may
account for the slow effect of them.</p>

<p>Three other heads were often seen in a row peeping out, but belonging
to harmless ‘glass snakes,’ and there was intelligence in their looks;
for they recognised the keeper, and advanced to the glass whenever he
passed, asking for their dinner as plainly as little snakes could ask.
A <i>Heterodon</i> exhibited equal intelligence when it was dinner-time,
and sprang at the glass when he saw the keeper coming. Some of the
pythons display intelligence too, on feeding days, but of quite an
epicure form. One day in May 1876, on remarking that the pythons were
disinclined to eat, Holland said ‘they were waiting for young ducks,’
only elderly birds being in their cage at the time. Even in summer they
don’t eat the old ducks so eagerly, because the large, hard quills
annoy them. A bunch of these quills passes undigested. Hair or feathers
in a desiccated mass pass through the snakes, and occasionally, when
they are not in health, digestible but undigested substances too, also
the beaks of the ducks.</p>

<p>Vegetable substances have been found in snakes, from<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_583" id="Page_583">[583]</a></span> which it has been
argued that they sometimes eat vegetables. But it rather argues that
they don’t digest vegetables, which have probably been swallowed in the
stomach of a rabbit or some other herbivorous animal that they have
caught.</p>

<p>An indifference to food was noticeable in the snakes in ungenial
weather. One cold, raw, foggy day in October 1873, a python caught
a duck and partially coiled it, but so feebly that the bird, after
passively submitting for a time, at last disengaged her feet and walked
away to shake herself, and then turn and stare as if to discover what
possibly had kept her there.</p>

<p>A similar disinclination to exert themselves was seen that same chilly
day in the largest cage, where were three large pythons. One of them
having killed a duck, could not get a satisfactory hold of its head,
and let go repeatedly. Another held a duck, but not to crush it or
hurt it; for it, like the one above named, only gazed deliberately
around, and as if asking the meaning of its detention. A third duck
was put into the den for the third python, who, however, only lazily
stared at it and made no attempt to seize it; while the bird gazed in
astonishment at the one in the embrace of the other snake, as if to
inquire, ‘What are you doing there?’ Presently this duck also got away,
and was again caught and only partially coiled. The python seemed too
large and fat to constrict so small a thing as a duck. It was like
tying up a pill-box with a rope. Some of the spectators expressed
satisfaction that the duck was not more tightly coiled, and hoped it
would succeed in getting away (the duck was not worth two shillings,
the python could not be bought for twenty pounds), and were far more
horrified when<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_584" id="Page_584">[584]</a></span> a vigorous constrictor caught and killed its prey in
one flash, as when an extended watch-spring flies back to its original
position. But a half-constricted creature does suffer, and happily
this does not often occur, the chilly weather that day diminishing
ophidian energy considerably. A gentleman, disappointed because they
did not eat, and wishing to assign some reason for such unaccountable
abstinence, remarked to his friend, ‘I have an idea they sting
themselves.’</p>

<p>Watching these gigantic ophidians on one of those half-wintry days,
it happened that two of them were lazily gliding, partially hidden by
their blanket, and with neither heads nor tails visible, so that the
two bodies seemed as only one snake. Two youths stood watching and
vainly endeavouring to calculate the numbers of feet or of yards which
were entwined and entwisted in those moving coils. Portions and loops
of two other pythons in the same cage were visible beyond the rug, but
only one head of all the four snakes was to be seen; and to distinguish
to which of the gliding, shining curves that head belonged, was
impossible. ‘It seems to me that snake’s such a length that he doesn’t
know the other part belongs to him,’ remarked one boy to his friend.</p>

<p>‘I don’t think he knows where it is,’ returned the other boy
sympathetically.</p>

<p>Not a little are the keepers sometimes tried in replying to the
inquiries of visitors desirous of improving their minds. Let me repeat
one or two conversations overheard on those Fridays.</p>

<p>‘Is that duck put in there for the snake to eat?’ asked a respectably
dressed man of the keeper on one of those<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_585" id="Page_585">[585]</a></span> autumnal days, when a duck
sat pluming itself as if settling itself for the evening.</p>

<p>‘Yes, sir,’ replied the keeper.</p>

<p>‘Will he swallow it whole?’</p>

<p>‘Yes, sir.’</p>

<p>‘Choke him! I should think?’</p>

<p>‘No, sir; no&mdash;it won’t choke him.’</p>

<p>The man studied the duck, and studied the size of the python’s head
and throat for some time. The duck apparently going to rest, but not
quite reconciled at so many persons intruding upon her, the man looked
disappointed, and again began:</p>

<p>‘Now is that duck charmed, sitting there?’</p>

<p>‘I should think, sir, she was not at all charmed with the prospect,’
sedately replied Holland.</p>

<p>‘Does that duck <i>know</i> it’s going to be eaten?’ then inquired the man
after fresh scrutiny.</p>

<p>‘No, sir,’ returned the keeper with the utmost gravity.</p>

<p>‘That snake don’t seem to be hungry,’ then said the disappointed
observer.</p>

<p>‘No, sir. He’ll eat well enough next Friday. He’s going to change his
skin.’</p>

<p>‘Oh!’ said the man to a boy by his side, satisfied, though still rather
puzzled, ‘that snake’s going to change his skin next Friday.’</p>

<p>Though there are always on an average fifty snakes in the Reptile
House, and on an average each casts its coat three times a year, the
visitors are for the most part much mystified about this phenomenon.
A snake that had just completed a new toilet had a portion of the old
slough still<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_586" id="Page_586">[586]</a></span> adhering to its tail, when a boy drew attention to it,
saying, ‘Papa, that snake is all ragged and torn on its tail.’</p>

<p>‘Yes, my dear, it is casting its tail.’ Papa must have been reading
Aristotle, who wrote: ‘Tails, also, of serpents and lizards when cut
off are reproduced.’ With regard to the reproduction of their eyes,
Aristotle spake more cautiously. ‘It is reported that the eyes of
serpents, if dug out, will be reproduced.’ But, on the contrary, the
eyes of snakes are easily injured, and <i>not</i> easily healed; snakes are
therefore frequently seen partially blind. As need scarcely be said,
only lizards ‘reproduce’ a tail that has been accidentally abridged;
and the repair is after all only a boneless one. The truncated member
gradually heals, and by and by a short point is again formed, but can
always be recognised as a repaired, and not the original, tail; and
as far as I have been able to observe, viz. for three or four months,
no bone was reproduced. Probably also a snake’s tail might heal in
the same way, and to a casual observer appear quite perfect; but the
anatomical structure in either case would not, I imagine, be restored.</p>

<p>That boy was not far wrong when he said he thought the python did not
know which was its own tail. At all events, it is not endowed with much
external sensation, as one might judge by the way in which the rats and
guinea-pigs take liberties with it. This must be owing to the thickness
of the cuticle, because, as we have seen in the constricting snakes,
there is keen muscular sensibility in the tail. I may cite an instance
of each case. One day a young rabbit caught hold of a small python
with its teeth and held firmly on. The reptile was moving across the
cage, and did not appear to feel<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_587" id="Page_587">[587]</a></span> any hindrance. Indeed, being much the
stronger of the two, the persistent bunny was compelled to hop along at
the same pace, still holding on by its teeth. But presently, from the
position of the snake, the rabbit was obliged to let go, when it next
caught hold of the tip of the python’s tail, and again holding tight,
hopped after the retreating reptile as if enjoying the joke. In this
case I do not think the snake was conscious of the insult, as perhaps
the rabbit had hold of the skin only.</p>

<p>On the other occasion a guinea-pig was biting a coiled and passive
constrictor, <i>Python sebœ</i>. The snake wished to be quiet, but piggy
got among its coils and worried it, hopping over it and biting its
tail. The python on this, moving only the end of its tail, pushed away
the guinea-pig, which soon returned to the attack. The snake again
gave the little animal a caudal hint that his fidgeting was annoying;
but as the guinea-pig did not take the hint, and still nibbled and
teased the snake, the latter with two coils of the tail put an end
to the annoyance, not once turning its head, but just tucking up its
persecutor in the end of its tail as you might tuck up a parcel under
your arm. The python was not hungry, and took no more notice of the
offender, though thus effectually punishing the offence with the last
two feet of its practical tail. Could we suppose such a quality as
muscular intelligence, we might think the tails of those constricting
snakes were surely endowed with it. As in other instances already
described in chaps. xi. and xii., the eyes took no part in directing
the movements of the snake; the whole nine or ten feet of the animal
remaining passively coiled, while only the extremity of the tail
exerted itself. When<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_588" id="Page_588">[588]</a></span> reptiles are in a partially torpid condition,
their sensations are slow; when hibernating, they are reduced to a
minimum. At such times, the creatures being half dead, they may be
maimed or injured without any apparent effect. Rats have been known to
attack and nibble snakes under these circumstances, and even to eat
bits out of them, the snakes being at the time unconscious of injury,
though possibly dying from the after effects.</p>

<p>A good deal of very interesting matter might be added on the economics
of the reptilian <i>ménage</i>, the mode of ventilating and warming it, the
cost of its larder, and the best means of preserving the health of the
inmates. There are, besides, some incidental experiences not devoid
of sensationalism in connection with snake guardianship, but my own
herpetological experience does not extend beyond the keeping of pet
lizards, including blindworms. I may add a word, however, in reply to
some often-heard lamentations of disappointed spectators who object to
the coverlets, after sometimes waiting in vain to see the snakes emerge
from beneath them.</p>

<p>‘Those horrid blankets! Why not give the snakes moss or hay in their
cages? or turf and sand and dead leaves? Much more natural for them
than those woollen rugs.’</p>

<p>I, too, may have echoed such plaints until a better comprehension of
ophidian nature showed the wisdom of what is certainly a somewhat
disappointing arrangement. And those who have honoured these pages
with a patient perusal, and discovered the nervous timidity and
sensitiveness of these reptiles, their proneness to reject or to
disgorge their food, to injure themselves or each other when molested,
not to mention the danger of meddling with the venomous<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_589" id="Page_589">[589]</a></span> kinds and
the easy escape of the swifter snakes, will admit the importance of
providing them with such retreat and shelter as can be most speedily
arranged, and which will secure the least annoyance to the terrified
serpents while the keepers are doing their best to preserve order and
cleanliness.</p>

<p>The allusion to lizards tempts me to add a word or two on the
exceptional species which has lately become an inmate of our Zoological
Gardens. There are certain features in it so much in common with
viperine snakes, that I may be pardoned for dragging a lizard into
these pages. I allude to the Heloderm (<i>Heloderma horridum</i>) from
Mexico, presented to the Zoological Society in July 1882 by Sir John
Lubbock. Its advent was an event in reptilian annals; and being
surrounded by a halo of curiosity, it claims a passing notice. We have
been at some pains to exonerate saurians from the evil character which
our ancestors were apt to give them; but suddenly&mdash;and to the surprise
of even some herpetological authorities&mdash;there comes a lizard that with
one grip of his jaws caused a frog to fall dead in a moment, and a
guinea-pig in three minutes, the symptoms appearing to be the same as
those produced by deadly snakes. The Heloderm is ‘said’ to be furnished
with poison glands in both jaws! But until a dead specimen has been
further examined and described, the signification of ‘poison gland’
must be restricted. Its teeth&mdash;many and strong&mdash;are grooved with a deep
furrow; its salivary glands are largely developed; and under excitement
a thick, acrid secretion flows abundantly from its jaws. Yet so far as
present observations enable us<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_590" id="Page_590">[590]</a></span> to form an opinion, the reptile does
not use these formidable teeth to secure its prey, or even in feeding.
It did not devour the victims of its bite, nor has it since killed any
creature for the express purpose of eating it. Up to the date at which
I write (Oct. 1882), eggs have formed its chief diet, varied by an
occasional dead mouse. Now it certainly does not require deeply-grooved
teeth and venomous saliva to bite raw eggs and dead mice. Nor does
the noxious secretion flow continuously from its gums in repose, but
abundantly so when irritated.</p>

<p>Though a stranger in England, this lizard was known more than two
hundred years ago. Hernandez, in his <i>Nova Animalium Mexicanum</i>,
published at Rome in 1651, described its bite as ‘hurtful, but not
deadly;’ and that it was ‘more dreadful in appearance than reality.’
Its Mexican name, <i>Acaltetepon</i>, is (or was then) applied to all large
and suspicious-looking lizards. <i>Scorpione</i> is its modern name. As
<i>Heloderma horridum</i> was awarded plenty of space in the journals at
the time of its arrival, full accounts of it will be found elsewhere;
it is introduced here merely as one of the venomous reptiles that form
the chief subjects of this chapter, and to trace its analogy with them.
In its slow, stealthy movements there is the same striking contrast
between the Heloderm and most other lizards, that there is between the
deadly vipers and the active colubrine snakes; and the inquiry suggests
itself, Can the venom elaborated in their system so act upon themselves
as to produce this habitual lethargy? Drowsiness and coma are almost
invariable effects of snake venom in the blood, and why is it that the
deadly serpents are so constitutionally different from others?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_591" id="Page_591">[591]</a></span> The
Heloderm has a round, heavy tail, of no service to it in swimming,
and short, weak fingers, ill suited to climbing; and it passes its
lethargic existence on the sandy plains of Mexico, manifesting in its
actions, or rather in its inactivity and stealthiness, a conscious
timidity and cowardice. Motionless for hours, with an impulse to
retreat if molested, but attempting to bite if angered, its noxious
saliva would seem to be rather protective than aggressive. It may have
formidable enemies at home; and by all we see of it here, it does not
use its teeth as a means of obtaining food. In this respect, therefore,
it is an exception to deadly serpents, and cannot take its venom into
its stomach as they do. And, again, the remarkable development of its
tongue suggests a peculiarity of food. In lapping the egg, the action
of it is apparently perfected by practice; the tongue is twisted,
extended, twined under, then over, now used as a shovel, a scoop, or a
broom, as occasion requires. It is the very reverse of what I noticed
in some other lizards feebly lapping up an egg (see p. 71), for in a
most expeditious manner does Heloderm cause its raw eggs to disappear.</p>

<p>A word <i>à propos</i> of its name <i>horridum</i>, supposed by many to refer
to its objectionable qualities. Unfortunately the word ‘horrid’ has
almost entirely lost its original signification and become mere slang
in English. But when Wiegmann assigned it the name of <i>Heloderma
horridum</i> in 1829, ‘horrid’ was understood according to its original
meaning, from <i>horridus</i>, rough, rugged, etc.; and as this reptile has
a remarkable skin, dotted over with little prominences, like knobs
or warts (hence its generic name, <i>Heloderma</i>, warty skin), there
can be but little doubt as to the intention of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_592" id="Page_592">[592]</a></span> <i>horridum</i>. In a
communication to <i>Knowledge</i> (Sept. 29), I ventured to call this the
‘Warty-skinned Lizard,’ in consequence of the confused accounts of it
which have appeared in print. There are several other warty-skinned or
‘tuberculous lizards.’ The specific <i>horridus</i>, as applied to the South
American Crotalus, also signified its terrible or dreadful character,
and not the ‘horrid’ which spectators apply indiscriminately to snakes
and their blankets.</p>

<p>With the rapid advance of ophiology comes the splendid new home for
snakes which will shortly grace our Zoological Gardens; and in taking
leave of my readers, I cannot offer them a kinder wish than that their
visits there to <i>observe</i> the snakes will be productive to them of as
much pleasure as has been mine to describe them.</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_593" id="Page_593">[593]</a></span></p>

<div class="chapter">

<h2 class="p4">INDEX.</h2>

<p class="pch">LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.</p>

<p class="pbq">Am., American; Ass., Association; Br., British; co., cobra; Con.,
Convention; cons., constrictor; cro., crotalus; cy., cyclopædia;
C.M.Z.S., Corresponding Member of the Zoological Society; F.Z., Fellow
of the Zoological Society; hist., history; nat., natural; N.Y., New
York; py., python; Soc., Society; s., snake; ss., snakes; ser.,
serpent; v., viper; vs., vipers; U.S., United States; z., zoological;
Z.G., Zoological Gardens; Trans., Transactions; Proc., Proceedings.</p>

<p class="pind">A</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Aberfoyle</b>’ (the barque), sea-ser. seen from, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Abnormal</b> development, of teeth, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of sea-sers., <a href="#Page_265">265</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of hair, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">two heads, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Abnormal</b>, health in captivity, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>, <a href="#Page_457">457</a>, <a href="#Page_565">565</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">gestation, <a href="#Page_437">437</a>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_459">459</a>, <a href="#Page_466">466</a>, <a href="#Page_505">505</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Academy</b> of Sciences, Paris, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Acaltetepon</i>, the, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Account</b>, of the Beasts in Virginia’, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the rattlesnake, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Acrobats" id="Acrobats">Acrobats</a></b>, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Adaptation" id="Adaptation">Adaptation</a></b>, of organization, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of habits to temperature, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Hibernation">hibernation</a>);</p>
<p class="pnii">of coils, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of ribs in progression, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of form, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Adaptive</b> development, of head bones, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of spine bones, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of windpipe, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of salivary glands, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_537">537</a>, <a href="#Page_557">557</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of teeth, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Adipose</b> tissue, <a href="#Page_394">394</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Admiralty</b>, the, report of a sea-ser. to, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Advance</b> of Ophiology, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>, <a href="#Page_443">443</a>, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <a href="#Page_515">515</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ælian</b>, an error traced to, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Æsculapius</b>, his remedies, <a href="#Page_522">522</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Africa</b>, range of sea-s., <a href="#Page_236">236</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Air-bladder</b>, the, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Air-breathers</b>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Air-tube</b>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Glottis">glottis</a>, <a href="#Respiration">respiration</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Albert</b> Nyanza’, the, <a href="#Page_358">358</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Alceste</b>, Voyage of the, <a href="#Page_111">111</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Alcohol</b> a popular remedy, <a href="#Page_548">548</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Aldrovandus</b>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his work, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Alexander</b> the Great, <a href="#Page_407">407</a> (<i>see <a href="#Bucephalus">Bucephalus</a></i>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Alligators</b>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Amazon</b>, the Jararaca, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Wallace’s ‘Travels in’, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">anaconda from, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>American</b> Agriculturist’, the, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>American</b> Ass. for the Advancement of Science, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_572">572</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">secretary to, <a href="#Page_490">490</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>American</b> colonies, the, <a href="#Page_284">284</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>American</b> Naturalist’, the, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="#Page_308">308</a>, <a href="#Page_310">310</a>, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_490">490</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">editor of, <a href="#Page_485">485</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Putnam">Putnam</a>).</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_594" id="Page_594">[594]</a></span></p><p class="pni"><b>American</b> sea-ser., <a href="#Page_252">252</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ammonia</b> an approved remedy, <a href="#Page_533">533</a>, <a href="#Page_547">547</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Amphibia</i>, the, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Amsterdam</b>, py. at, <a href="#Page_437">437</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Anatomy" id="Anatomy">Anatomy</a></b>, of head, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of jaws, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the spine, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the rattlesnake, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Anatomy</b> of the Vertebrates’, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>, <a href="#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_336">336</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Owen">Owen</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Anecdotes</b> of Serpents’, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>, <a href="#Page_523">523</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Animal</b> Biography’, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Animal</b> kingdom, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Animal</b> Physiology’, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>, <a href="#Page_210">210</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Carpenter">Carpenter</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Animal</b> Physiology’ (Roget’s), <a href="#Page_120">120</a>, <a href="#Page_195">195</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Roget">Roget</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Animal</b> World’, the, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Animalium</b> Mexicanum’, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Annales</b> des Sciences Naturelle’, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Antennæ</b> of insects, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Antidotes</b>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Fayrer’s definition of, <a href="#Page_533">533</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">various reputed ones, <i>ib.</i>, <a href="#Page_534">534</a>, <a href="#Page_539">539</a>, <a href="#Page_547">547</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Apodal</b>, ss. are, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Appendages</b>, mythical, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">caudal, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">epidermal, <a href="#Page_315">315</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘horns’, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">crest, <a href="#Page_325">325</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">tentacular, <a href="#Page_326">326</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">as ‘claws’, <i>ib.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Rattles">rattle</a>, <a href="#Epidermis">epidermis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Aquatic</b> ss., <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_233">233</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_401">401</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>, <a href="#Page_453">453</a>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>, <a href="#Page_496">496</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Arabs</b> chew herbs, <a href="#Page_525">525</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Archeopteryx</i>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Aristotle</b>, his name for reptiles, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">bite of s., <a href="#Page_96">96</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">marine ss., <a href="#Page_244">244</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vs., <a href="#Page_432">432</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><i>Arius</i>, the, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Armadillo</b>, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Association</b>, Am., <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Association</b>, Br., <a href="#Page_42">42</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Atlantic</b>, the, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-ss. in, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-ser., <a href="#Page_252">252</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Atrophied</b> limbs, <a href="#Page_326">326</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Atter</i>, <i>ætter</i>, <a href="#Page_479">479</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Aunt</b> Judy’s Magazine’, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>, <a href="#Page_312">312</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>, <a href="#Page_470">470</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Aural</b>: powers of <i>anguis fragilis</i>, <a href="#Page_476">476</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">apparatus of ground ss., <a href="#Page_527">527</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Australia</b>, s.-hunting in, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-s., <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_246">246</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Australia</b>, Snakes of’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Krefft">Krefft</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Axolotl</i>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">B</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bacon</b>, Lord, quoted, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a poor naturalist, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Bagrus</i>, the, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Baird</b> of U.S. on the bull-s., <a href="#Page_502">502</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Baker</b>, Owen, a sea-ser. seen by, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Baker</b>, Sir Samuel: v. fangs, <a href="#Page_357">357</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Balance</b> of Nature, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Balfour" id="Balfour">Balfour</a>’s</b> ‘British India’, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Balfour’s</b> ‘Cyclopædia of India’, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bancroft</b>, H. H., ser.-worship, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Banks</b>, Sir Joseph, action of ribs, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">letter to Waterton, <a href="#Page_418">418</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bard</b> of Avon, the, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bartlett</b>, Mr. A. D., on the sea-ser., <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">presenting a v., <a href="#Page_322">322</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">buying an anaconda, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Barton</b>, Benjamin Smith, on the <i>Cro.</i>, <a href="#Page_299">299</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bartram</b> (Mr., of U.S.): a ‘roaring’ s., <a href="#Page_155">155</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘cluster of teeth’, <a href="#Page_371">371</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bates</b> (H. W.): a cannibal s., <a href="#Page_39">39</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Jararaca</i>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Batrachia</i>, the, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Battues</i> of ss., <a href="#Page_286">286</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Beal</b> (J. W., of U.S.): sound of the rattle, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Beaufort</b>, Duke of (A.D. 1709), <a href="#Page_173">173</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Beaumont</b> and Fletcher, quotation from, <a href="#Page_487">487</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Beauvoir</b>, Palisot de, his testimony, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Bell" id="Bell">Bell</a></b>, Prof. Thomas, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">food of ring-s., <a href="#Page_74">74</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his tame s., <a href="#Page_76">76</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his ‘British Reptiles’, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a trustworthy herpetologist, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss. drink, <i>ib.</i>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">editor ‘Zoological Journal’, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on <i>anguis fragilis</i>, <a href="#Page_453">453</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">gestation of <i>anguis fragilis</i>, <a href="#Page_466">466</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sloughing of <i>anguis fragilis</i>, <a href="#Page_481">481</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_493">493</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bellowing</b> s., <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ben</b> Jonson, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bengal</b>, Bay of, range of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_236">236</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Berkeley</b>; rattlesnake remedies, <a href="#Page_538">538</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Beverley</b>, Colonel: a stinging tail, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his ‘History of Virginia’, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a severed head biting, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bezoar</b>, <a href="#Page_523">523</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bibron</b>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a> (<i>see</i> Duméril).</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_595" id="Page_595">[595]</a></span></p><p class="pni"><b>Bingley</b>, a boa feeding, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Blackie</b>’, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bladder</b>, the swim-, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Blake</b> (Colonel, of Virginia), a rattlesnake, <a href="#Page_284">284</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Blanket</b>, swallowed, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">disappointing, <a href="#Page_588">588</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Blowing</b>: the, vi. 152;</p>
<p class="pnii">as ‘puffing’, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">like a bull, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bluets</b>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bond</b>, Rev. H., his testimony, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bones</b>: of the head, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">intermaxillary, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of spine, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in <i>Deirodon</i>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of tail, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of ‘claw’, <a href="#Page_220">220</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Jaws">jaw</a>, <a href="#Vertebrae">vertebræ</a>, <a href="#Tail">tails</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bonnat</b>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Borneo</b>, <i>Crotalidæ</i> in, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Boston</b>, U.S., sea-ser. off, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Buffon</b>, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his era, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bourbon</b>, Isle of, py. incubating in, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bournemouth</b>, lizards at, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a capture, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bourrelets</b>, of the rattle, <a href="#Page_304">304</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bowerbank</b>, a two-headed s., <a href="#Page_190">190</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Braden</b>, J. G., Esq.: specimens of rattle, <a href="#Page_306">306</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Brazil</b>, tree s. in, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Discourse’ of, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">names of <i>Crotalidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">specimens from, <a href="#Page_339">339</a>, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Jararaca</i> in, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Travels’ in, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">experiments in, <a href="#Page_406">406</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vernaculars of, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Breathing" id="Breathing">Breathing</a></b>: irregular, <a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sometimes partial, <a href="#Page_144">144</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">suspension of, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="#Page_253">253</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">as ‘puffing’, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Hibernation">hibernation</a>, <a href="#Respiration">respiration</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bridgewater</b> Treatise, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>British</b> Ass., <a href="#Page_42">42</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>British</b> Guiana, Hist. of, <a href="#Page_420">420</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>British</b> India (<i>see</i> <a href="#Gunther">Günther</a>, <a href="#Fayrer">Fayrer</a>, <a href="#Balfour">Balfour</a>, <a href="#Nicholson">Nicholson</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Br._M." id="Br._M.">British</a></b> Museum, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>, <a href="#Page_291">291</a>, <a href="#Page_377">377</a>, <a href="#Page_405">405</a>, <a href="#Page_418">418</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Dr. Günther’s catalogue of ss. at, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>British</b> Reptiles’ (Bell’s), <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>, <a href="#Page_453">453</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Bell">Bell</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Brittain</b>, Mr., evidence of, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Broderip</b>, Dr. J., a naturalist, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his works, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the larynx, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">quoted by Gosse, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">observations by, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Browne</b>, Sir Thomas: ‘Vulgar Errours’, <a href="#Page_171">171</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a two-headed s., <a href="#Page_191">191</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_487">487</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bruton</b>, Dr. Lauder, <a href="#Page_552">552</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Buckland" id="Buckland">Buckland</a></b>, Frank: his visit to Chelsea, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a ‘flannel sausage’, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the Coronella, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_435">435</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a waggish s., <a href="#Page_104">104</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a mistake of, <a href="#Page_115">115</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sensitiveness of tail, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a sea-s., <a href="#Page_238">238</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a ribbon fish, <a href="#Page_250">250</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-ser., <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_264">264</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">two-headed s., <a href="#Page_189">189</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">reserve fangs, <a href="#Page_346">346</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">s. eggs, <a href="#Page_437">437</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">anaconda, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">invited, <a href="#Page_464">464</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">obituary notice of ‘Cleo’, <a href="#Page_515">515</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bull</b> -frog, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bullen</b>, George, Esq., of Br. Museum, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Bulletin</b>, U.S., Zoological ‘Reports’, <a href="#Page_291">291</a>, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Burman</b> coast, sea-ss. range, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Burrowing</b> ss., <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_188">188</a>, <a href="#Page_459">459</a>, <a href="#Page_468">468</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">C</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Caledonia</b>, New, sea-ss. at, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cannibalism</b>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_401">401</a>, <a href="#Page_562">562</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sometimes unintentional, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_572">572</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">common among the <i>Elapidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_567">567</a>, <a href="#Page_571">571</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cañons</b>, ss. in, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Cantor" id="Cantor">Cantor</a></b>, Dr. Theodore, sea-ss. drinking, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">quotes Schlegel, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">tongue of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_125">125</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-ss. asleep, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on pelagic sers., <a href="#Page_235">235</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">their poison, <a href="#Page_243">243</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">their food, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">number of species, <a href="#Page_246">246</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cape</b>, the, sea ser. at, <a href="#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Capybara</i>, the, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Carbolic</b> acid, kills ss., <a href="#Page_544">544</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a remedy for the venom, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Carinate</b> scales, <a href="#Page_319">319</a> (<i>see</i> ‘<a href="#Keel">keel</a>’).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Carolina</b>, History of’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Lawson">Lawson</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Carolina</b>, Natural History of’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Catesby">Catesby</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Carpenter" id="Carpenter">Carpenter</a></b>, Dr., F.R.S., etc., links and transitions in nature, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his opinion of Bacon, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">lungs of ss., <a href="#Page_143">143</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">hibernation, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">length of spine, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">insalivation of food, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vegetable protectives, <a href="#Page_539">539</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Carver</b>, Jonathan, a ‘blowing’ s., <a href="#Page_153">153</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">large swarms of ss., <a href="#Page_225">225</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_487">487</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Catesby" id="Catesby">Catesby</a></b>, Mark: an egg robber, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the ‘blowing v.’, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_596" id="Page_596">[596]</a></span></p><p class="pnii">‘Horn ss.’, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘water vs.’, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">rattle-ss., <a href="#Page_284">284</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘hog-nosed’ ss., <a href="#Page_410">410</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Indian remedies, <a href="#Page_538">538</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Catlin</b>, George, rattlesnake <i>battues</i>, <a href="#Page_287">287</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">an alarm, <a href="#Page_391">391</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">conjugal ss., <a href="#Page_502">502</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Indian superstitions, <a href="#Page_509">509</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cats</b>, their whiskers as feelers, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">tenacious of life, <a href="#Page_559">559</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">resist venom, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Caudal</b>, eloquence, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_179">179</a>, <a href="#Page_311">311</a>, <a href="#Page_587">587</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">appendages, <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <i>et seq.</i> 174 (<i>see</i> <a href="#Tail">tail</a>, <a href="#Rattles">rattle</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Caverns</b>, the retreat of ss., <a href="#Page_287">287</a>, <a href="#Page_443">443</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Caves</b>, sacred, <a href="#Page_509">509</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">abode of ss., <a href="#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>, <a href="#Page_288">288</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Centipedes</b>, legs of, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Ceylon</b>, History of’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Tennant">Tennant</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chalk</b> epoch, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Challenger</b>’, voyage of the, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chambers</b>: ‘Anecdotes of Serpents’, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>, <a href="#Page_523">523</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">editor of the ‘Journal’, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">observations at the Z.G., <a href="#Page_217">217</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the ‘Miscellany’, <a href="#Page_523">523</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chancery</b>, ss. in, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_515">515</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chandernagor</b>, travels in, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Charas</b>, Moyse: his work, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">he ‘grovels’ for fangs, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">experiments on vs., <a href="#Page_371">371</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a ‘nursery’ of fangs, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">knew of the mobility of fangs, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Charming</b>, Sir H. Sloane on, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">its origin, <a href="#Page_515">515</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_578">578</a>, <a href="#Page_585">585</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Fascination">fascination</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Charms</b>, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in s. relics, etc., <a href="#Page_509">509</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chase</b>, a, with a s., <a href="#Page_214">214</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chased</b> by a s., <a href="#Page_185">185</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chateaubriand’s</b> descriptions of ss., <a href="#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_307">307</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the maternal asylum, <a href="#Page_487">487</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Chelonia</i>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chelsea</b>, tame ss. at, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>, <a href="#Page_515">515</a>, <a href="#Page_525">525</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chicago</b>, observations at, <a href="#Page_496">496</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Chimaphila</i>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chinese</b> mythologies, <a href="#Page_509">509</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Chittagong</b>, rare beast from, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Chordæ vocales</i>, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Circulation</b> of blood, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">checked by cold, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">renewed by warmth, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">moisture essential to it, <a href="#Page_162">162</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Hibernation">hibernation</a>, <a href="#Respiration">respiration</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>City</b> of Baltimore’, the, sea sers. seen from, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Clarke’s</b> translation of Der Hoeven’s ‘Handbook of Zoology’, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Classification" id="Classification">Classification</a></b>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">at present defective, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">five principal groups of ss., <a href="#Page_53">53</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by dentition unsatisfactory, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">difficulties occurring in, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Krefft on, <a href="#Page_423">423</a> (<i>see</i> nomenclature).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Clayton</b>, Mr. J., the ‘tayle’ of rattlesnakes, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Climbing</b>, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_238">238</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of Anguis fragilis, <a href="#Page_475">475</a>, <a href="#Page_482">482</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cockburn</b> <i>versus</i> Mann, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Coiling" id="Coiling">Coiling</a></b>, the, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in constriction, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of tail, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_587">587</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in convolutions, <a href="#Page_185">185</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">for a spring, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">to substitute hands, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">swiftness of, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">flexibility of, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the sea-ser., <a href="#Page_257">257</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Heterodon</i>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>, <a href="#Page_570">570</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in repose, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>, <a href="#Page_587">587</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of ‘Lizzie’, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>, <a href="#Page_478">478</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Natrix</i>, <a href="#Page_569">569</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the <i>Lacertines</i>, <a href="#Page_571">571</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Constriction">constriction</a>);</p>
<p class="pnii">before striking, <a href="#Page_573">573</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cold</b>; ss. affected by, <a href="#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>, <a href="#Page_584">584</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cold-blooded</b>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">why so, <a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Hibernation">hibernation</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Colours</b> of ss., <a href="#Page_10">10</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">under excitement, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="#Page_572">572</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of tree ss., <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of rattlesnakes, <a href="#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="#Page_285">285</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of African vs., <a href="#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_338">338</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of ‘Bushmaster’, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_426">426</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">variable in young ss., <a href="#Page_424">424</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in other ss., <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">after moulting, <a href="#Page_508">508</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Sloughing">sloughing</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Combats</b> between ss., <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_563">563</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Congress</b> (U.S.), Government Commissions, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Constriction" id="Constriction">Constriction</a></b>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of young boas, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>, <a href="#Page_446">446</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sometimes feeble, <a href="#Page_583">583</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Constrictors</b>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_258">258</a>, <a href="#Page_336">336</a>, <a href="#Page_438">438</a>, <a href="#Page_446">446</a>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>, <a href="#Page_583">583</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Convention" id="Convention">Convention</a></b>, a, of ss., <a href="#Page_104">104</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">U.S. on ss., <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <a href="#Page_505">505</a>, <a href="#Page_552">552</a>, <a href="#Page_572">572</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cooke</b>, M. C., ‘Our Reptiles’, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">editor ‘Science Gossip’, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a herpetologist, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cooper</b>, W. R., ‘Serpent Myths’, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cope</b>, Professor, of U.S., <a href="#Page_386">386</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cotton</b>, Dr., of Tennessee, his rattlesnake, <a href="#Page_298">298</a>.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_597" id="Page_597">[597]</a></span></p><p class="pni"><b>Coues</b>, Dr. Elliott, of U.S., a combat, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sound of the rattle, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">development of rattle, <a href="#Page_312">312</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">action of fangs, <a href="#Page_362">362</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">cro. fang, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">species of cro., <a href="#Page_386">386</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">virulence of bite, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">pigs not exempt, <a href="#Page_394">394</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Council</b> of Z. Soc., <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_322">322</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cows</b> sucked by ss., <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_478">478</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Coypu</i>, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cragin</b>, Mr. F. W., on <i>Heterodon</i>, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cranberry</b> swamps, the <i>Massasauga</i>, <a href="#Page_393">393</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Crepitaculum caude</i>, the, <a href="#Page_294">294</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Crispe</b>, Dr. Edwards, F.Z.S., on the œsophagus, <a href="#Page_490">490</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the maternal refuge, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><i>Crocodilia</i>, the, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Crotalina</i>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Crotalum</i>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Crotchets mobiles</i>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_362">362</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cruden</b>, s. poison, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cruelty</b>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>, <a href="#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_469">469</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Curiosities</b> of Natural History’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Buckland">Buckland</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Cuvier</b>; his classification, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his ‘boa’, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">he distinguished fangs, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his era, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">quoted by Darwin, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his ‘vs.’, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">incubation, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>, <a href="#Page_456">456</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Cyclopædia</b> of Anatomy’, <a href="#Page_118">118</a></p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Cyclopædia</b> of India’, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Cyclopædia</b>, the Penny’, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>.</p>


<p class="pind">D</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Dahomey</b>,</p>
<p class="pnii">ser. deities at, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">natives fearless of vs., <a href="#Page_523">523</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Dalton</b>, the ‘Bushmaster’, <a href="#Page_420">420</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Danish</b> vernaculars, <a href="#Page_479">479</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Darwin" id="Darwin">Darwin</a></b>; complex organisms, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>cro. mutus</i>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a living fossil, <a href="#Page_244">244</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Platypus</i>, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">survival of the fittest, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the rattle, <a href="#Page_311">311</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">atrophied limbs, <a href="#Page_326">326</a>, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Daudin</b>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Davidson</b>, Mr. (R. N.), a sea-ser., <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Davis</b>’ Lectures at the Z. G., <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_413">413</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Flower">Flower</a>, <a href="#Huxley">Huxley</a>, <a href="#Mivart">Mivart</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Dean</b>, Dr., a sea-ser. seen by, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Deccan</b> Days’, <a href="#Page_517">517</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Frere">Frere, Miss</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Deer</b> kill rattlesnakes, <a href="#Page_394">394</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Deglutition</b>; manner of, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">facilitated by saliva, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in drinking, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Schlegel on, <a href="#Page_362">362</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">watched at the Z. G., <a href="#Page_581">581</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>De Kay</b>; ‘Zoology of N.Y.’, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Demerara</b>, ‘Bushmaster’ there, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Dentition" id="Dentition">Dentition</a></b>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Deirodon</i>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_241">241</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of sea-ser., <a href="#Page_266">266</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">various forms of, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">distinguishing names in, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus. of, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">not used in classification, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Cuvier’s distinctions, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Günther on, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">dentition of <i>Zamenis</i>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Xenodons</i>, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>, <a href="#Page_404">404</a>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Liophis</i>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Fangs">fangs</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Der Hoeven</b>, on the tongue, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on gestation, <a href="#Page_435">435</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Dermis</b>, <i>see</i> <a href="#Epidermis">epidermis</a>, <a href="#Sloughing">sloughing</a>, etc.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Desquamation</b>, <a href="#Page_329">329</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Sloughing">sloughing</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Development</b>; of poison glands, <a href="#Page_535">535</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of fangs, <a href="#Page_356">356</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Fangs">fangs</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Digestion</b>;</p>
<p class="pnii">power of, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">assisted by salivary secretions, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>, <a href="#Page_557">557</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Dinornis</i>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Dinotherium</i>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Discourse</b> of Brazil’, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Disgorged" id="Disgorged">Disgorging</a></b>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">to facilitate escape, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">compulsory, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">from terror, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Dissection</b>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of a rattlesnake, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Xenodon</i>, <a href="#Page_405">405</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Dog-teeth</b>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <a href="#Page_370">370</a> (<i>see</i> fang).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Doubleday</b>, H., Esq., important evidence, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Drachen</i>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Dracon</i>, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><i>Dracunculi</i>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Dragon</b>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Drevar</b>, George, a sea-ser. seen by, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Drink</b>, Do ss.? 76, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Drinking</b>; 76, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">frequently, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">die without, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">milk, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">lured by milk, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">two methods of, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by suction, <i>ib.</i>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by lapping, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Milk">milk</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Drosera</i>, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Drummond</b>, Lieutenant (R.N.), sea-ser. seen by, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_598" id="Page_598">[598]</a></span></p><p class="pni">‘<b>Dublin</b> University Magazine’, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_312">312</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Du Chaillu</b>: ‘whistling’ ss., <a href="#Page_154">154</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his <i>Wild Life</i>, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Dudley</b>, Paul: on the cro., <a href="#Page_281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a long rattle, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Dumeril" id="Dumeril">Duméril</a></b>: much quoted, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Professor <i>d’Erpétologie</i>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">py. drinking, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on Schlegel, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the tongue, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">glottis, <a href="#Page_136">136</a>, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>la languette</i>, <i>ib.</i>, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">hissing, ‘<i>soufflement</i>’, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">quotes Linnæus, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">absorption of heat, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">physical feats of ss., <a href="#Page_181">181</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">anaconda, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">its spots, <a href="#Page_338">338</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the rattle, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">cro. does not hiss, <a href="#Page_313">313</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">system of dentition, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">species of vs., <a href="#Page_374">374</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>les fossettes</i>, <a href="#Page_384">384</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">tail of <i>Lachesis</i>, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">species of cro., <a href="#Page_388">388</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Jararaca</i>, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Python bivitatus</i>, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Duncan</b>, Professor Martin, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pind">E</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Echidnine</b>, <a href="#Page_534">534</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Edentata</b>, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Edentulous</b>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Effeldt</b>, Rudolph; observations of the tongue, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Egg</b>: producers, ‘insects’, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">covering, <a href="#Page_432">432</a>, <a href="#Page_433">433</a>, <a href="#Page_435">435</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Incubation">incubation</a>, <a href="#Oviparous">oviparous</a>, <a href="#Ovoviviparous">ovoviviparous</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Eggs</b> of ss., <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_431">431</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">produced by pys., <a href="#Page_437">437</a>, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_446">446</a>, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by boas, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by anaconda, <a href="#Page_456">456</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by <i>anguis fragilis</i>, <a href="#Page_462">462</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by other ss., <a href="#Page_431">431</a>, <a href="#Page_433">433</a>, <a href="#Page_435">435</a>, <a href="#Page_437">437</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Eggs</b>; of birds food of ss., <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_430">430</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">swallowed whole, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sometimes disgorged, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">passed entire, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘sucked’, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">food of lizards, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_591">591</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Egypt</b>, History of’, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sculptures of, <a href="#Page_508">508</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">jugglers in, <a href="#Page_523">523</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ser. deities in, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_511">511</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">myths of, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">charmers, <a href="#Page_515">515</a>, <a href="#Page_523">523</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">antidotes in, <a href="#Page_525">525</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Electric</b> fluid, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Elementary</b> Lessons in Physiology’, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>, <a href="#Page_303">303</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Huxley">Huxley</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Elsie</b> Venner’, <a href="#Page_301">301</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Elwes</b>, Mr. A. T., artist, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a witness, <a href="#Page_185">185</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Emblems</b>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href="#Page_509">509</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_518">518</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Embryo</b>, <a href="#Page_435">435</a>, <a href="#Page_448">448</a>, <a href="#Page_451">451</a>, <a href="#Page_462">462</a>, <a href="#Page_466">466</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Emmons</b>’ ‘Nat. Hist. of N.Y.’, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Emotions" id="Emotions">Emotions</a></b>;</p>
<p class="pnii">feeble, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">expressed by the tail, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_179">179</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by the ribs, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_328">328</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Encyclopædias</b>, as books of reference, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">perplexing, <i>ib.</i>, <a href="#Page_418">418</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">errors in, <a href="#Page_362">362</a>, <a href="#Page_418">418</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Encyclopædia</b> of Anatomy;’ the tongue, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">incubation, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Encyclopædia</b> Metropolitana;’ the ‘Bushmaster’, <a href="#Page_420">420</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Endurance</b>, powers of, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_457">457</a>, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Epidermis" id="Epidermis">Epidermis</a></b>; expansile, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">scales of, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_193">193</a>, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illustrated, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">magnified, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">head-shields, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">carinated, <a href="#Page_319">319</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘horns’, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>, <a href="#Page_323">323</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">developments of, <a href="#Page_325">325</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">casting or sloughing, <a href="#Page_329">329</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the process watched, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>, <a href="#Page_481">481</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">health affected by, <a href="#Page_329">329</a>, <a href="#Page_337">337</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">patterns of skin, <a href="#Page_338">338</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_517">517</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illustrated, <a href="#Page_339">339</a>, <a href="#Page_340">340</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Epiglottis</b>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Glottis">glottis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Erie</b>, Lake, U.S., swarms of water ss., <a href="#Page_226">226</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">and of rattlesnakes, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Erpétologie</b> Générale’ (Suites de Buffon), <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>, <a href="#Page_136">136</a>, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="#Page_313">313</a>, <a href="#Page_384">384</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>, <a href="#Page_444">444</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Dumeril">Duméril</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Essai</b> sur la Physionomie des Serpents’, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">translation of, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>, <a href="#Page_363">363</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Schlegel">Schlegel</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Essequibo</b>, rambles in, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Estivation</b>, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Evolution</b>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_314">314</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in fangs, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ewart</b>, Dr., his experiments, <a href="#Page_552">552</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Expansion</b>: of the throat, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of jaws, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the skin, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the ribs, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_328">328</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Expedition</b> to the Zambesi’, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Expedition</b>; U.S. Explorations, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_291">291</a>, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Experiments</b>; on vs., <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>, <a href="#Page_321">321</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the fangs, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_377">377</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in s. venom, <a href="#Page_534">534</a>, <a href="#Page_535">535</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in antidotes, <a href="#Page_537">537</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Explorations</b>, U.S., <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_291">291</a>, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Eye</b> of ss., <a href="#Page_285">285</a>, <a href="#Page_328">328</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_337">337</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">watching, <a href="#Page_581">581</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">easily injured, <a href="#Page_586">586</a>.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_599" id="Page_599">[599]</a></span></p><p class="pni"><b>Eye</b> covering, <a href="#Page_328">328</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>


<p class="pind">F</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fabulous</b>; animals, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">tongues, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ideas of reptiles, <a href="#Page_511">511</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Fairie</b> Queen’, the, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Fangs" id="Fangs">Fangs</a></b>; Cuvier’s distinction, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_241">241</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">early experiments with, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">mobility of early, described, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>, <a href="#Page_283">283</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a means of defence, <a href="#Page_311">311</a>, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">functional pair, <a href="#Page_345">345</a>, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">construction of, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the ‘slit’, involution, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>, <a href="#Page_358">358</a>, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus. of, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">diversities of, <a href="#Page_357">357</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">succession of, <a href="#Page_346">346</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">action of, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">specially described, <a href="#Page_377">377</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a hypodermic syringe, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">control of, <a href="#Page_375">375</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">fixed and moveable, <a href="#Page_362">362</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">reserve or supplementary, <a href="#Page_366">366</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">shedding of, <i>ib.</i>, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">exquisite finish, <a href="#Page_358">358</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus., <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">fangs of young vs., <a href="#Page_360">360</a>, <a href="#Page_361">361</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of young cos., <a href="#Page_361">361</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Xenodons</i>, <a href="#Page_403">403</a>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Heterodon d’Orbignyi</i>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Bucephalus</i>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Ring Hals</i>, <a href="#Page_582">582</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Fascination" id="Fascination">Fascination</a></b>, Sir Hans Sloane on, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">investigated, <a href="#Page_527">527</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">conclusions, <a href="#Page_531">531</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fat</b>; abundant in ss., <a href="#Page_165">165</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">absorbed during hibernation, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">an article of commerce, <a href="#Page_286">286</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a remedy, <a href="#Page_522">522</a>, <a href="#Page_541">541</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">protective to pigs, <a href="#Page_394">394</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fatalists</b> in India, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_511">511</a>, <a href="#Page_513">513</a>, <a href="#Page_540">540</a>, <a href="#Page_555">555</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Fayrer" id="Fayrer">Fayrer</a></b>, his <i>Thanatophidia</i>, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss. eat eggs, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">swallow them whole, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">drink milk, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Echis carinata</i>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">prehensile tails, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-ss., <a href="#Page_236">236</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Enhydrina</i>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus. of scales, <a href="#Page_240">240</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">bite of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_241">241</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sloughing of co., <a href="#Page_332">332</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus. of dentition, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">fangs of young cos., <a href="#Page_361">361</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">renewal of fangs, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in vipers, <a href="#Page_365">365</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vibratile fangs, <a href="#Page_375">375</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Crotalidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Bushmaster’, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vernaculars of India, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">cos. incubating, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">maternal affection, <a href="#Page_503">503</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Hindû superstitions, <a href="#Page_512">512</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">what an antidote is, <a href="#Page_533">533</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">virulence of <i>Echis</i> venom, <a href="#Page_537">537</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of co. venom, <a href="#Page_554">554</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">effect of strychnine, <a href="#Page_543">543</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">carbolic acid and creosote, <a href="#Page_544">544</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">how to deal with the bites, <a href="#Page_545">545</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">gift of cos. to the Z. Soc., <a href="#Page_563">563</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fear</b>; a strong feature in ss., <a href="#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_412">412</a>, <a href="#Page_471">471</a>, <a href="#Page_517">517</a>, <a href="#Page_565">565</a>, <a href="#Page_574">574</a>, <a href="#Page_578">578</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">paralyzing effect of, <a href="#Page_529">529</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">causes a bitten victim to succumb, <a href="#Page_536">536</a>, <a href="#Page_544">544</a>, <a href="#Page_558">558</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Feeding" id="Feeding">Feeding</a></b>; mode of, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_133">133</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_528">528</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Friday">Friday, notes from the Z.G.</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Feeling</b>; expressed by tail, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_158">158</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Tail">tail</a>);</p>
<p class="pnii">by the tongue, <a href="#Page_126">126</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Tongue">tongue</a>);</p>
<p class="pnii">by sound, <a href="#Page_526">526</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vibration, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Feigning</b> death, <a href="#Page_411">411</a>, <a href="#Page_412">412</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ferguson</b>, ‘Tree and Serpent Worship’, <a href="#Page_513">513</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fernandez</b>, ‘Animalium Mexicanum’, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Festivals</b> to snake deities, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_511">511</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fetish</b> customs and superstitions, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fiction</b>; ss. of, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">tongues of, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fish</b>; lizard, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">experiments with, <a href="#Page_243">243</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ribbon, <a href="#Page_250">250</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">supposed sea-sers., <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">living at great depths, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">carrying their eggs, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fissure</b>, the gular, <a href="#Page_328">328</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fistulous</b> teeth, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fitzinger</b>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Flappers</b>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Flattening</b>; of head, <a href="#Page_410">410</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of body, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="#Page_411">411</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Floods</b>, ss. carried down by, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Florence" id="Florence">Florence</a></b>; Redi on vs., <a href="#Page_273">273</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">experiments at, <i>ib.</i>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Fontana at, <a href="#Page_368">368</a>, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘knowing physicians’ at, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_556">556</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the ‘Florentine philosopher’, Redi, <a href="#Page_555">555</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Flower" id="Flower">Flower</a></b>, Prof., on Armadillos, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Follicles</b>, secreting, <a href="#Page_384">384</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fontana</b>, Felix, structure of fangs, <a href="#Page_368">368</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">prior observations, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">earlier experiments, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Food</b>; often declined, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_460">460</a>, <a href="#Page_566">566</a>, <a href="#Page_567">567</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sometimes disgorged (<i>see</i> <a href="#Disgorged">disgorged</a>, <a href="#Feeding">feeding</a>, <a href="#Constriction">constriction</a>, <a href="#Z.G.">Z.G.</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Forbes</b>, Alexander K., co. guardians, <a href="#Page_511">511</a>.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_600" id="Page_600">[600]</a></span></p><p class="pni"><b>Forbes</b>, F. E., ‘The Dahomeans’, Fetish deities, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">natives fearless of vipers, <a href="#Page_523">523</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Forms</b>; sectional, of ss., <a href="#Page_215">215</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of scales, <a href="#Page_337">337</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Epidermis">epidermis</a>, <a href="#Scales">scales</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Forsyth</b>, Mr. D. M., saw a ‘monster’, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fosse</b>; the gular, <a href="#Page_328">328</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">nasal, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (pit.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fossil</b> forms, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">anomalous, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">living ones, <a href="#Page_244">244</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fraxinius</b> Americanus kills rattlesnakes, <a href="#Page_541">541</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>French</b>, early naturalists, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Frere" id="Frere">Frere</a></b>, Miss, ‘Old Deccan Days’, <a href="#Page_513">513</a>, <a href="#Page_517">517</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Fresh</b> -water ss., <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Friar</b>, a, of Brazil, <a href="#Page_271">271</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Purchas">Purchas</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Friar</b>, a, of Portugal, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Friday" id="Friday">Friday</a></b>, feeding-day at the Z.G., <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>, <a href="#Page_585">585</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Z.G.">Z.G.</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Frogs</b>; food of ss., <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">gigantic, at sea, <a href="#Page_256">256</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sometimes reappear, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>de profundis</i>, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Functions</b> retarded, <a href="#Page_431">431</a>, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_497">497</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">G</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Galileo</b>, <a href="#Page_480">480</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gall</b> a remedy for bites, <a href="#Page_284">284</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gambia</b>, <i>Lepidosiren</i> of, <a href="#Page_244">244</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ganges</b>, sea-ss. climbing, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gape</b> of ss. wide, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_378">378</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gardens</b>, Zoological, of London, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, etc. (<i>see</i> <a href="#Z.G.">Z.G.</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Garnett</b>, Richard, Esq., of the Br. M., <a href="#Page_25">25</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gastric</b> juice, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gatty</b>, Mrs. Alfred, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gautier</b>, Prof., his experiments, <a href="#Page_556">556</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Generall</b> Historie of Virginia’ (John Smith, 1632), Indian beliefs, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Geographical</b> Distribution of Animals’, A. R. Wallace, <a href="#Page_382">382</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Geophagus</i>, the, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gesner</b>, his ‘Historia Animalium’, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Gestation" id="Gestation">Gestation</a></b>; period of uncertain, <a href="#Page_431">431</a>, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>, <a href="#Page_457">457</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">depends on temperature, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>, <a href="#Page_466">466</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gigantic</b>; worms, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">gooseberry, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">developments, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gilmore</b>, Parker, water vs., <a href="#Page_227">227</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘puff adders’, <a href="#Page_501">501</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gill</b>, Prof., on the maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gills</b> retained through life, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_244">244</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Glands" id="Glands">Glands</a></b>, salivary, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>, <a href="#Page_536">536</a>, <a href="#Page_556">556</a>, <a href="#Page_560">560</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the <i>Heloderm</i>, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Glottis" id="Glottis">Glottis</a></b>; position of, <a href="#Page_133">133</a>, <a href="#Page_136">136</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sheath of, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of water ss., <a href="#Page_223">223</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">how far extended, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Glyphodon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Goode</b>, Prof. Browne, on the maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_498">498</a>, <a href="#Page_572">572</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Gosse" id="Gosse">Gosse</a></b>, Philip H., <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in Jamaica, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">how ss. drink, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">quotes M’Leod, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the tongue, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss.’ power of springing, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the sea-ser., <a href="#Page_248">248</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the ‘Bushmaster’, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Chilobothrus</i>, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vegetable antidotes, <a href="#Page_525">525</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gossip</b>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_480">480</a>, <a href="#Page_585">585</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gradations</b>; in teeth, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in fangs, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in length of jaw, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in glands, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in venomous secretions, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Grasshopper</b>, a ‘reptile’, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gray</b>, Dr. E., <a href="#Page_5">5</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">quotes Schlegel, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the tongue, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">species of <i>cro.</i>[, <a href="#Page_291">291</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ed. of ‘Zoological Miscellany’, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his work, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Jararaca</i>, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gray</b>, Captain David, on the sea-ser., <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_264">264</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Green</b>, Joseph H., muscles of the larynx, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Green</b>, Mr., collector at Bournemouth, <a href="#Page_461">461</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Greenland</b>, sea-ser. off, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Grooved</b>; scales, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">teeth, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Heloderm</i>, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">fangs, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>, <a href="#Page_361">361</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Grosvenor</b> Gallery, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ground</b> -snakes, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>, <a href="#Page_479">479</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Grovelling</b> for fangs, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>, <a href="#Page_378">378</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gular</b>; teeth, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus. of, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">fissure, <a href="#Page_328">328</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gullet</b>; of <i>Deirodon</i>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">position of, <a href="#Page_133">133</a>, <a href="#Page_415">415</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gunpowder</b> used for bites, <a href="#Page_543">543</a>, <a href="#Page_544">544</a>, <a href="#Page_546">546</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Gunther" id="Gunther">Günther</a></b>, Dr. Albert, F.R.S., etc., of the Br. M., <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">deglutition, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Br. M. collection of snakes, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his five groups, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_601" id="Page_601">[601]</a></span></p><p class="pnii">ss. require water, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Schlegel an authority, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">abundant saliva, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the tongue, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vibrating tails, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">burrowing forms, <a href="#Page_188">188</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a mistake of Schlegel, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">fresh-water ss., <a href="#Page_222">222</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-ss., <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href="#Page_240">240</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a semi-pelagic s., <a href="#Page_243">243</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the epidermis, <a href="#Page_315">315</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">names of head-shields, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus. <i>ib.</i>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a friend in need, <a href="#Page_322">322</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on dentition, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Xenodon</i>, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a poser, <a href="#Page_405">405</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the venom, <a href="#Page_536">536</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Gurney</b>, Mr. T. H., <a href="#Page_491">491</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_492">492</a>.</p>


<p class="pind">H</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hakluyt’s</b> voyages, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Halford</b>, Prof.: a vain search, <a href="#Page_405">405</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">disclaims an ‘antidote’, <a href="#Page_533">533</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his experiments, <a href="#Page_547">547</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">explanations, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘On the Condition of Blood from Snake-bite’, <a href="#Page_548">548</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">approves of stimulants, <a href="#Page_547">547</a>, <a href="#Page_550">550</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Halifax</b>, sea ser. off, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hall</b>, Captain, dissection of rattlesnake, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hardwicke’s</b> ‘Science Gossip’, ed. of, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">evidence, <a href="#Page_492">492</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Harrison</b>, Captain, R.N., describes a marine animal, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Harting</b>, J. E., F.Z.S., etc., <a href="#Page_411">411</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hartwig</b>, Geo., ‘Tropical World’, <a href="#Page_418">418</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Haynes</b>, Lieutenant, R.N., describes a gigantic anomaly, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hayward</b>, S., Esq., viper-swallowing evidence, <a href="#Page_493">493</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hayward’s Heath</b>; hibernating ss. found, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Head</b>; expansile, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">double, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">shields of, <a href="#Page_315">315</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus., <a href="#Page_316">316</a>-18;</p>
<p class="pnii">forms, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>, <a href="#Page_319">319</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">generic characters of, <a href="#Page_319">319</a>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">appendages of, <a href="#Page_320">320</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Horns">horns</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hebrides</b>, sea-ser. off, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hellmann</b>, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the tongue, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Heloderm</i>, the, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Hernandez" id="Hernandez">Hernandez</a></b>, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">double-headed s., <a href="#Page_190">190</a> (<i>see</i> Fernandez), <a href="#Page_279">279</a>, <a href="#Page_591">591</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Herpetology</b>, confusion in, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">derivation of, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Hibernation" id="Hibernation">Hibernation</a></b>; character of, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">convenience of, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">analogy in vegetation, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">renewal of vitality after, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">when partial, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">when fatal, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">fat absorbed during, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in communities, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">seasons of, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_169">169</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of slow-worms, <a href="#Page_461">461</a>, <a href="#Page_468">468</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hindû</b>; superstitions, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>, <a href="#Page_509">509</a>, <a href="#Page_511">511</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_517">517</a>, <a href="#Page_555">555</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">eggs sacred offerings of, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vernaculars, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">transliteration, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hissing</b>, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">prolonged, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">exceptions in, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_313">313</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">variations in, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Histoire</b> Naturelles’ (Daudin), <a href="#Page_488">488</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Historiæ</b> Rerum’, etc. (Marcgravius), <a href="#Page_397">397</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>History</b> of British Guiana’ (Dalton), <a href="#Page_420">420</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>History</b> of Egypt’ (F. Holt Yates), <a href="#Page_96">96</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>History</b> of Selborne’, <a href="#Page_490">490</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>History</b> of Virginia’ (Col. Beverley, 1722), <a href="#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Holbrooke" id="Holbrooke">Holbrooke</a></b>, Dr. J. E., of the U.S.A., ss. like milk, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the Bull s., <a href="#Page_155">155</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘thorn tail s.’, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>battues</i> of rattlesnakes, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">length of the rattle, <a href="#Page_301">301</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on <i>Heterodon</i>, <a href="#Page_412">412</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Holland" id="Holland">Holland</a></b>, Mr., keeper at the Reptilium; ss. drink often, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss. don’t ‘lick’, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss. sloughing, <a href="#Page_334">334</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">bitten, <a href="#Page_438">438</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in danger, <a href="#Page_448">448</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Z.G.">Z.G.</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Holmes</b>, Oliver Wendell, ‘Elsie Venner’, a tradition, <a href="#Page_301">301</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Holodontes</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Home</b>, Sir Everard; action of ribs, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the scutæ, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hood</b>, the, of co., <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>, <a href="#Page_517">517</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Horns" id="Horns">Horns</a></b>; of vs., <a href="#Page_315">315</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sloughed, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">peculiar action of, <a href="#Page_323">323</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Epidermis">epidermis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Horrid</b>’, <a href="#Page_592">592</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">original signification of, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Howe</b>, ‘History of Ohio’, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>battues</i> of ss., <a href="#Page_289">289</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>H.R.H.</b> the Prince of Wales, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">co. performances in India, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Humboldt</b>, antitoxic plants, <a href="#Page_539">539</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hunter</b>, St. Jno. Dunn, rattlesnake testimony, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hutchinson</b>, Mr. H. F., progression of ss., <a href="#Page_216">216</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Huxley" id="Huxley">Huxley</a></b>, Prof., F.R.S., etc., prehistoric man, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_602" id="Page_602">[602]</a></span></p><p class="pnii">smell and taste, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">locomotion of ss., <a href="#Page_196">196</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a beautiful bit of anatomy, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">growth of nails, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on evolution, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘eyelids’ of ss., <a href="#Page_329">329</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">teeth, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">perfection of fang, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a hypodermic syringe, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hybrids</b> born at the Gardens, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Hypodermic syringe</b>, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pind">I</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ichthyic</b>, <a href="#Page_244">244</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ichthyosauria</b>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Illustrations</b>; often misleading, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>, <a href="#Page_324">324</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Illustrators</b>, responsibility of, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, etc.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Imbricated</b> scales, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Immunity</b> from venom, <a href="#Page_523">523</a>, <a href="#Page_524">524</a>, <a href="#Page_538">538</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_559">559</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Inadvertent</b> intruder, an, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Inchantments</b>’, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Incubation" id="Incubation">Incubation</a></b> of py., <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">early known, <a href="#Page_441">441</a>, <a href="#Page_443">443</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">mentioned by Aristotle, <a href="#Page_441">441</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of Jamaica boa, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>India</b>; Prince of Wales in, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">superstitions of, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_511">511</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_517">517</a>, <a href="#Page_555">555</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Indian</b> Ocean; range of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_236">236</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-ser. seen in, <a href="#Page_256">256</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Indian</b> snakes’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Nicholson">Nicholson</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Indian</b> vernaculars, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Indians</b>, N. Am., their traditions, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href="#Page_294">294</a>, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>, <a href="#Page_509">509</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">quick of hearing, <a href="#Page_527">527</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">good physicians, <a href="#Page_282">282</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">prompt in danger, <a href="#Page_391">391</a>, <a href="#Page_544">544</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ingenious</b> chirurgeons, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">taking the lead in science, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Insalivation</b> of food, <a href="#Page_352">352</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Glands">glands</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Insects</b>’, what they were, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Insensibility</b> produced by venom, <a href="#Page_577">577</a>, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Institution</b>, London, Lectures at (<i>see</i> <a href="#Huxley">Huxley</a>, <a href="#Ruskin">Ruskin</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Integument</b>; expansion of, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">modifications in, <a href="#Page_315">315</a>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">hood of co., <a href="#Page_327">327</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sloughing, <a href="#Page_329">329</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">patterns and colouring, <a href="#Page_338">338</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Epidermis">epidermis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Intermaxillary</b>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Intoxication</b> counteracted by venom, <a href="#Page_548">548</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Iowa</b>, the first rattle, <a href="#Page_295">295</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the whiskey cure, <a href="#Page_549">549</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ipecacuanha</b>, an approved medicine, <a href="#Page_537">537</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Irritability</b>; of rattlesnakes, <a href="#Page_312">312</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of young ss., <a href="#Page_437">437</a>, <a href="#Page_438">438</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of young slow-worms, <a href="#Page_463">463</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Isodon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Isodontiens</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Italian</b>, a noble, <a href="#Page_278">278</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Redi">Redi</a>).</p>

<p class="pind">J</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>J. J. A.</b>’, shoals of sea ss., <a href="#Page_238">238</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Jamaica</b>, blind worms in, <a href="#Page_187">187</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Gosse">Gosse</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Japan</b>, Indian <i>Crotalidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Jardin</b> des Plantes, Paris, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Java</b>, Indian <i>Crotalidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Java</b> Naja, a double-headed s., <a href="#Page_190">190</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Jaws" id="Jaws"></a>Jaws</b>, the; six, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sometimes seven, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">action of, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">how articulated, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">widely extensible, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_139">139</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>, <a href="#Page_569">569</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">adjustment of, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_139">139</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">independent action of, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_343">343</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">all furnished with teeth, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus. of, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Jesse</b>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">important evidence, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Johnson</b> ‘wrot on Brazile’, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Jones" id="Jones">Jones</a></b>, Rymer, bulk of ss.’ tongue, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sense of touch, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">pliancy of the spine, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the rattle, <a href="#Page_307">307</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">an inadvertence, <a href="#Page_308">308</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss.’ eyelids, <a href="#Page_329">329</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">incubation, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Jourdan</b>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Joynts</b>’; of the rattle, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the jaw, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Juyce</b> of the bag’, <a href="#Page_556">556</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Salivary">salivary</a>, etc.).</p>


<p class="pind">K</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Kamptee</b>, snakes at home, <a href="#Page_501">501</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Kansas</b>, observations in, <a href="#Page_498">498</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Keel" id="Keel">Keel</a></b> -shaped scales, <a href="#Page_319">319</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">developed in the <i>Tropidonoti</i>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">derivation, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_603" id="Page_603">[603]</a></span></p><p class="pnii">elaborated in viperine, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <a href="#Page_426">426</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus. of, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_193">193</a>, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Keeper</b> at the Z.G. in danger, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_589">589</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Holland">Holland</a>, <a href="#Tyrrell">Tyrrell</a>, <a href="#Z.G.">Z.G.</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Kentucky</b>, rattle from, <a href="#Page_296">296</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Killing</b> prey, three ways of, <a href="#Page_29">29</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Z.G.">Z.G.</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Kingdom</b>, animal, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">links in, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Kingsley</b>, the <i>Cascobel</i>, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">charm of a discovery, <a href="#Page_404">404</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Kingston</b>, a ‘fearful beauty’, <a href="#Page_418">418</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Kirtland</b>, Jared, of Ohio, on increase of ss., <a href="#Page_57">57</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">describes the <i>Massasauga</i>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>, <a href="#Page_393">393</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">cro. named from him, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Klein</b>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Kniuet</b>, Master Anthony, on Brazil, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Knowing</b> Physicians’, experiments, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_556">556</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Krefft" id="Krefft">Krefft</a></b>, Gerard: ‘drumming’ ss., <a href="#Page_154">154</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">hibernating, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">s. hunting, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">death adder, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">climbing ss., <a href="#Page_219">219</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Homalopsidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-ss., <a href="#Page_235">235</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">their length, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href="#Page_246">246</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on classification, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Krishna</b>, Hindû god, <a href="#Page_518">518</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">L</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lacépède</b>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>le rativoro</i>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>la rude</i>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lacerda</b>, experiments, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>, <a href="#Page_557">557</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Lacerta agilis</i>, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Laidley</b> worm, the, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lamarrepiquot</b>, M., incubation, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Landells</b>, J. H., sea ser. seen by, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lapping</b>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of lizards, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_591">591</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>anguis fragilis</i>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Larkes</b>’, how caught, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Larynx</b>, the, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_133">133</a>, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Last</b> Rambles among the Indians’ (Catlin), <a href="#Page_289">289</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Latreille</b>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Laurenti</b>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Lawson" id="Lawson">Lawson</a></b>, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his ‘insects’, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_282">282</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his ‘reptiles’, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">an egg merchant, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">milk-drinkers, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘blowing’ vs., <a href="#Page_152">152</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘thorn tail’ or ‘horn’ s., <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">dedication of his work, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">water-ss., <a href="#Page_226">226</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the poison teeth, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Leaping</b>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Leathes</b>, Col., a sea-ser., <a href="#Page_252">252</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Leaves</b> from the Notebook of a Naturalist’ (W. J. Broderip), <a href="#Page_140">140</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">boa feeding, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lectures</b>, the ‘Davis’, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Lond. Inst., <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>, <a href="#Page_329">329</a>, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">St. George’s Hall, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lee</b>, H., Esq., on the sea ser., <a href="#Page_262">262</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Leisure</b> Hour’, the, on snakes, <a href="#Page_115">115</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus., <a href="#Page_116">116</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lenz</b>, H. O., <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">s. drinking, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the tongue, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><i>Lepidosiren</i>, the, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ichthyic characters of, <a href="#Page_244">244</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Letters</b> from Alabama’ (P. H. Gosse), <a href="#Page_9">9</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lewarn</b>, W., sea-ser. seen by, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Licking</b>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Life</b> among the Indians’ (<i>see</i> Catlin), <a href="#Page_391">391</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Life</b> in the South’ (Catherine C. Hopley), <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Lightning</b>’, H.M.S., voyages of, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lilford</b>, Lord, an ophiophilist, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_567">567</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lincolnshire</b>, ‘larkes’ in, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Linnæus</b>, his systems, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his ‘<i>colubers</i>’, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">out of date, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">temperature of ss., <a href="#Page_161">161</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his successors, <a href="#Page_382">382</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">dumb rattlesnake, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Coluber scaber</i>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">slow-worms, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Liverpool</b>, statements at, <a href="#Page_256">256</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Livingstone</b>, egg-eating ss., <a href="#Page_66">66</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss. come to drink, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a bleating s., <a href="#Page_154">154</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss. on board, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lizards</b>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_453">453</a>, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Zootica</i> sheltering her young, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Heloderm</i>, <a href="#Page_589">589</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b><a name="Lizzie" id="Lizzie">Lizzie</a></b>’, very thirsty, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_481">481</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">her achievements, <a href="#Page_459">459</a>, <a href="#Page_471">471</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">her wrong names, <a href="#Page_471">471</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus., <a href="#Page_472">472</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in a knot, <a href="#Page_478">478</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">two libels, <a href="#Page_480">480</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">climbing, <a href="#Page_482">482</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Loades</b>, Mr. Henry (1682), his gift to the R. Soc., <a href="#Page_275">275</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lockwood</b>, Mr., of U.S., pine s. drinking, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">mystic coils, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘blowing’ s., <a href="#Page_155">155</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Lolo</b>’, a tame snake, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_604" id="Page_604">[604]</a></span></p><p class="pni"><b>Loomis</b>, Rev. Chauncey, <a href="#Convention">Convention on Snakes</a>, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lord</b>, John Keast, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Egyptian jugglers, <a href="#Page_523">523</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lovering</b>, Prof. Jno., President of the Am. Ass., <a href="#Page_485">485</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lubbock</b>, Sir Jno., gift of a <i>Heloderm</i> to Z. Soc., <a href="#Page_589">589</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Lubrication" id="Lubrication">Lubrication</a></b>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Lubricity</b>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><i>Lycodon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">M</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Maçeio</b>, a cannibal s. at, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mackeney</b> on the Am. Indians, <a href="#Page_509">509</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>M’Leod</b>, his book, <a href="#Page_111">111</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">boa feeding, <i>ib.</i>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>M’Quhæ</b>, Capt. of H.M.S. Dædalus, official report of a sea-ser., <a href="#Page_259">259</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Madagascar</b>, range of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_236">236</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Madras</b>, experiments of Dr. Shortt, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>, <a href="#Page_550">550</a>, <a href="#Page_552">552</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Maine</b>, U.S.A., Am. Ass. held at Portland (<i>see</i> <a href="#Convention">Convention on Snakes</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Malacca</b>, marine salamander off, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Malay</b>, Indian <i>Crotalidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">antitoxic plants, <a href="#Page_539">539</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mammals</b>, necks of, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mann</b>, Mr., pet snakes, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_515">515</a>, <a href="#Page_525">525</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Marcgravius</b>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Marine</b> fauna, <a href="#Page_233">233</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Sea-ss">sea-ss.</a>, <a href="#Sea-ser">sea-ser.</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Master</b> teeth’, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>, <a href="#Page_556">556</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Maternal</b>; instincts, <a href="#Page_290">290</a>, <a href="#Page_431">431</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>, <a href="#Page_464">464</a>, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">affection of ss. witnessed, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <a href="#Page_448">448</a>, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_502">502</a>, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Maternal</b> refuge, <a href="#Page_483">483</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">an old belief, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">physiologically possible, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">examination of evidence, <a href="#Page_492">492</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">speculations on, <a href="#Page_505">505</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Maunder’s</b> ‘Treasury of Natural History’, <a href="#Page_111">111</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Maxillary</b> bone (<i>see</i> <a href="#Jaws">jaws</a>, <a href="#Dentition">dentition</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Maximus</b> and Minimus, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mechanism</b>, ‘curious’, <a href="#Page_380">380</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Spine">spine</a>, <a href="#Fangs">fangs</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Medical</b> College of London, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Medical</b> Times’, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_547">547</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Meham</b>, member of Am. Con., <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Memoirs</b> of Captivity among the Indians’, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Menina</b>’, tame boa, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Merembergius</b> on Brazil, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Merrem</b>, herpetologist, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mexican</b>; vernaculars, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">rattle, <a href="#Page_296">296</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus. of, <a href="#Page_306">306</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mexico</b>, Gulf of, shoals of ss., <a href="#Page_231">231</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ancient temples in, <a href="#Page_510">510</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Heloderm</i> from, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Michigan</b>, Mr. Beal on the rattle, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Massasauga</i> there, <a href="#Page_393">393</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Milan</b>, experiments at, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Milk" id="Milk">Milk</a></b>, drinkers of, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">saved by, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mischief</b>; by the tongue, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by the tail, <a href="#Page_171">171</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by stings, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of delay in a bite, <a href="#Page_544">544</a>, <a href="#Page_545">545</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Mischiefs</b>’, source of, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>, <a href="#Page_556">556</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Missionary</b> Travels (Livingstone), <a href="#Page_154">154</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mississippi</b>, the, <a href="#Page_295">295</a>, <a href="#Page_549">549</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Mitchell" id="Mitchell">Mitchell</a></b>, Dr. Weir, of U.S., <a href="#Page_5">5</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his experiments, <a href="#Page_291">291</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vibration of rattle, <a href="#Page_312">312</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">replacement of fangs, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>, <a href="#Page_375">375</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">capsules of, <a href="#Page_378">378</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">rapidity of stroke, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">number of species, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">expiration, <a href="#Page_389">389</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">virulence of bite, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the headless trunk, <a href="#Page_391">391</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Mivart" id="Mivart">Mivart</a></b>, Prof., F.R.S., orders of reptiles, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on classification, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Moisture</b>; essential to ss., <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">to the hatching of eggs, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>, <a href="#Page_457">457</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Monsters</b>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Monstrosities</b>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_256">256</a>, <a href="#Page_517">517</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Moore</b>, Mr., his testimony, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mouth</b> of ss. (<i>see</i> <a href="#Jaws">jaws</a>, <a href="#Teeth">teeth</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Movements" id="Movements">Movements</a></b>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Coiling">coiling</a>, <a href="#Constriction">constriction</a>, <a href="#Swimming">swimming</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mucous</b> secretions abundant, <a href="#Page_36">36</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Lubrication">lubrication</a>, <a href="#Salivation">salivation</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Müntras</b>, Hindû belief in, <a href="#Page_512">512</a>, <a href="#Page_555">555</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Muridæ</i>, the, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Mus coypus</i>, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Muscles</b>: of the larynx, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the tail, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_587">587</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in the slow-worm, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the ribs, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">irritability of, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_471">471</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Muscular</b> powers of ss., <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Musée</b> d’Histoire, <a href="#Page_443">443</a>, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Museum</b>, Br. (<i>see</i> <a href="#Br._M.">Br. M.</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Museum</b>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of Paris, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_605" id="Page_605">[605]</a></span></p><p class="pnii">Australian, <a href="#Page_246">246</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the R.C.S., <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of Washington, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Music</b>, ss.’ love of, <a href="#Page_525">525</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><i>Myopotamus</i>, the, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Mythology</b>, ancient serpent symbols, <a href="#Page_508">508</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">N</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Nâg</b>, <b>Nâgo</b>, Nâgowa, caste names of India, <a href="#Page_513">513</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>National</b> Library, our, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Natter</i>, <a href="#Page_479">479</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Natural</b> History, development of, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">at Florence, <a href="#Page_368">368</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in England, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>, etc.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Natural</b> History of New York’, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Natural</b> History of Carolina’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Catesby">Catesby</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Natural</b> History of Reptiles’ (Gosse), <a href="#Page_90">90</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Naturalist</b> in Jamaica’ (Gosse), <a href="#Page_186">186</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Naturalist’s</b> Notes from South Africa’, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Naturalist</b> on the Amazon’ (Bates), <a href="#Page_421">421</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Naturall</b> Historie of Serpentes’, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Neck</b>: vertebræ of, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">snakes have none, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Neck</b> -toothed ss., <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Netto</b>, Dr., experiments with venom, <a href="#Page_557">557</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Neuwied</b>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Nevada</b>, incident in, <a href="#Page_549">549</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>New</b> Caledonia, sea ss., <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>New</b> Experiments on Vipers’ (1673), <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_371">371</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>New</b> Jersey, Lockwood on the pine s., <a href="#Page_93">93</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>New</b> York State, <i>battues</i> of rattlesnakes, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Newman</b>, Ed., editor of ‘Zoologist’, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_492">492</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">maternal affection of <i>Zootica vivipara</i>, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Newspapers</b> quoted: American, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Country, the, <a href="#Page_310">310</a>, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Dailies, the, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Echo’, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Field’, the, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>, <a href="#Page_490">490</a>, <a href="#Page_493">493</a>, <a href="#Page_498">498</a>, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>, <a href="#Page_522">522</a>, <a href="#Page_530">530</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Illus. Lond. News’, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Knowledge’, <a href="#Page_592">592</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Land and Water’, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="#Page_399">399</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_405">405</a>, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>, <a href="#Page_465">465</a>, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>, <a href="#Page_524">524</a>, <a href="#Page_526">526</a>, <a href="#Page_530">530</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Liverpool, <a href="#Page_256">256</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘London General Advertiser’ (1752), <a href="#Page_285">285</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Medical Times’, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_547">547</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Modern Thought’, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Nature’, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="#Page_329">329</a>, <a href="#Page_474">474</a>, <a href="#Page_536">536</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Times’, the, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>, <a href="#Page_520">520</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Weeklies, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Nicander</b>, his two-headed s., <a href="#Page_190">190</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Nicholson" id="Nicholson">Nicholson</a></b>, Dr. Ed., of Madras: ‘Indian Snakes’, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss. drinking, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-ss., <a href="#Page_235">235</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">replacement of teeth, <a href="#Page_344">344</a>, <a href="#Page_375">375</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">four stages of development in, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the Russell’s v., <a href="#Page_537">537</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">important statistics, <a href="#Page_541">541</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">efficacy of tobacco, <a href="#Page_542">542</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">self-inflicted bites, <a href="#Page_559">559</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Nicols</b>, Arthur, Esq., F.G.S. (‘Zoological Notes’), on the tongue, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">rattle, <a href="#Page_310">310</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">instance of maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Nicotine</b> fatal to ss., <a href="#Page_542">542</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Nightingale</b>, Mr. W., a cure by alcohol, <a href="#Page_551">551</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Nocturnal</b>, most ss. are, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>, <a href="#Page_503">503</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Noise</b>, not ‘music’, <a href="#Page_526">526</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Nomenclature</b>, perplexing, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">why so, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Classification">classification</a>, <a href="#Vernaculars">vernaculars</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Norfolk</b>, important evidence from, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>North</b> -American Herpetology’, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_301">301</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Holbrooke">Holbrooke</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Norway</b>, sea-sers. frequent, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Nostrils</b>, ss. breathe through, <a href="#Page_139">139</a>, <a href="#Page_143">143</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">opposite the glottis, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">higher in water ss., <a href="#Page_223">223</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vertical in anaconda, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">and in sea-ss., <a href="#Page_234">234</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">double in the <i>Crotalidæ</i> (<i>see</i> ‘<a href="#Pit">pit</a>’).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Nova</b> Animalium Mexicanum’, <a href="#Page_590">590</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Hernandez">Hernandez</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Novum</b> Organum’ (Lord Bacon), <a href="#Page_99">99</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Nubians</b> use antitoxics, <a href="#Page_525">525</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">O</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Obsolete</b> teachings, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>, <a href="#Page_478">478</a>, etc.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ocquago</b>, rattlesnake den, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Odontography</b>’, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Owen">Owen</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Œsophagus</b>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">gular teeth there, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>.</p>

<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_606" id="Page_606">[606]</a></span></p><p class="pni"><i>Ogmodon</i>, grooved tooth, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ohio</b>; Dr. Kirtland’s observations in, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>, <a href="#Page_393">393</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>battues</i> of s., <a href="#Page_289">289</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">evidence of the maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_496">496</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Oil</b>; abundant in ss., <a href="#Page_165">165</a>, <a href="#Page_286">286</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of vs., a remedy for their bite, <a href="#Page_522">522</a>, <a href="#Page_541">541</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Oldenlandia</i>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Oligodon</i>, few toothed, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Ophidarium</i>, the, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Ophidia</i>; divisions of, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">groups of, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">all carnivorous, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">and oviparous, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">prejudices regarding, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">well supplied with teeth, <a href="#Page_344">344</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sub-orders of, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">complications in classification, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ophidiana</b>, s. gossip, <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Ophidion</i>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Ophiodes</i>, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ophiology</b>;</p>
<p class="pnii">meaning of, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">advance of, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ophis</b>, the seeing, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Oppel</b>, herpetologist, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Organization</b> of the Animal Kingdom’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Jones">Jones</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Origin</b> of Species’, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="#Page_311">311</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Darwin">Darwin</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Osborne</b>’, the (Royal yacht), marine animal seen from, <a href="#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Oviparous" id="Oviparous">Oviparous</a></b>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_431">431</a>, <a href="#Page_433">433</a>, <a href="#Page_497">497</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Gestation">gestation</a>, <a href="#Incubation">incubation</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Ovoviviparous" id="Ovoviviparous">Ovoviviparous</a></b>, <a href="#Page_431">431</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_505">505</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">exceptional cases, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>, <a href="#Page_462">462</a>, <a href="#Page_505">505</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Owen" id="Owen">Owen</a></b>, Professor, F.R.S., etc., <a href="#Page_22">22</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the jaws, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Deirodon</i>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the tongue, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the glottis, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">lung of ss. 142, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>chordæ vocales</i>, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">prehensile tails, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">saltatory motion, <a href="#Page_184">184</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">exquisite organization of the spinal column, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="#Page_336">336</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss. are acrobats, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">spine of py., <a href="#Page_210">210</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ichthyic characters of the <i>Lepidosiren</i>, <a href="#Page_244">244</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the sea-ser., <a href="#Page_254">254</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Bucephali</i>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">P</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Paca</i>, the, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pacific</b>, sea-ss. in, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Palæontology</b>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Palate</b>, armed with teeth, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_343">343</a>, <a href="#Page_402">402</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus., <a href="#Page_355">355</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">two jaws, <a href="#Page_343">343</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Palmer</b>, Dr. E., of the Smithsonian Institute, U.S., important evidence, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Panama</b>, sea-ss. at, <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">boa from, <a href="#Page_438">438</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Paradox</b>, the, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Paraguay</b>, ss. washed down from, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">observations in, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pauline</b> (the barque): sea-ser. testimony, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, <a href="#Page_256">256</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pearson</b> (Commander of Royal yacht <i>Osborne</i>): report of a gigantic marine animal, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Pelagic" id="Pelagic">Pelagic</a></b> serpents, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_240">240</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Cantor">Cantor</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Penny</b> Cyclopædia, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Penny</b> Magazine, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pepys</b> quoted, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pernambuco</b>, <i>Xenodons</i> from, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Persia</b>, ‘Travels in’ (Sir R. Ker Porter), <a href="#Page_113">113</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Peru</b>, ‘Travels in’, <a href="#Page_419">419</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Tschudi">Tschudi</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Phares</b>, Dr. D. L., Science Convention on Snakes, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pharmacopœia</b>, the homœopathic, <a href="#Page_556">556</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pharynx</b>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Phené</b>, <i>Sun and Serpent Worship</i>, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Philosophical" id="Philosophical">Philosophical</a></b> Transactions: first tropical s., <a href="#Page_117">117</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Dr. Tyson on the larynx, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">two-headed s., <a href="#Page_190">190</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a porcupine swallowed, <a href="#Page_192">192</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Sir E. Home on progression, <a href="#Page_208">208</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">stimulating influence, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">anatomy of a rattlesnake, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Vipera Caudisona</i>, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Sir Hans Sloane’s experiments, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">early observations, <a href="#Page_295">295</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a venerable cro., <a href="#Page_302">302</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sloughing of reptiles, <a href="#Page_331">331</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">mobility of fangs, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">reserve fangs, <a href="#Page_371">371</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">succession of fangs, <a href="#Page_373">373</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">how they become fixed, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">brooding of eggs, <a href="#Page_443">443</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Philosophical</b> Society, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Physicians</b>, ‘knowing’ ones at Florence, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Physionomie</b> des Serpents’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Schlegel">Schlegel</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Pilgrimage</b>’, the, of Purchas, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pipe</b> -fish, the, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b><a name="Pit" id="Pit">Pit</a></b>’, the, of cro.: first observed by Tyson, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">its use still undetermined, <a href="#Page_381">381</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a plague to classifiers, <a href="#Page_382">382</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘secreting follicles’ of Owen, <a href="#Page_384">384</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘<i>fossettes lacrymales</i>’ of Duméril, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_607" id="Page_607">[607]</a></span></p><p class="pnii"><i>Bothrophidæ</i> named from them, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Crotalidæ</i> of modern ophiologists, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pitfield</b> (Captain O. A.): shoals of ss. seen by, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Plate</b>, River, ss. washed down, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vernaculars of, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Platt</b>, Mr., a Florentine enthusiast, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Platypus</i>, the, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pliny</b>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Poison</b>, renewed, <a href="#Page_351">351</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘spouted’, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Poisonous</b>; tongue, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">teeth (<i>see</i> <a href="#Fangs">fangs</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pontoppidan</b>: Bishop, sea-ser. history, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Poojah</b>, <a href="#Page_512">512</a>, <a href="#Page_513">513</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Porcupine</b>; swallowed, <a href="#Page_192">192</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">H.M.S., <a href="#Page_262">262</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Porter</b>, Sir R. Ker, sensationalism, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his travels, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Portland</b>, U.S., Convention on Snakes, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <a href="#Page_506">506</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Portuguese</b>: the, as colonists, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a friar of, on Brazil, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">name for snake, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Prairie</b> Farms’, <a href="#Page_227">227</a> (<i>see</i> Gilmore).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Prehensile</b> tails, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_233">233</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of anaconda and <i>anguis fragilis</i>, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Prey</b>, how caught, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="#Page_203">203</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Z.G.">Notes from the Z.G.</a>);</p>
<p class="pnii">bulk of, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>, <a href="#Page_585">585</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">shifted in the mouth, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">held by coils, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_410">410</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Prince</b> of Wales in India, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pringle</b>, Mr. E. H., sea-ss. on shore, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a supposed sea-ser., <a href="#Page_249">249</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Progression" id="Progression">Progression</a></b>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by the ribs, <a href="#Page_208">208</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">like swimming, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="#Page_430">430</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Movements">movements</a>, <a href="#Acrobats">acrobats</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Psalms</b>, the, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pseudo</b> -fangs, <a href="#Page_403">403</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pseudoxia</b>, or ‘Vulgar Errours’, <a href="#Page_171">171</a>, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Psylli</b>, the, <a href="#Page_522">522</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Pterosauria</i>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Puffing</b>, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Pulmonary</b> bag, the, <a href="#Page_142">142</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Purchas" id="Purchas">Purchas</a></b>, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>, <a href="#Page_428">428</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Putnam" id="Putnam">Putnam</a></b>, F. W., of U.S., editor of the ‘American Naturalist’, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">secretary to the Am. Ass., <a href="#Page_485">485</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_497">497</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">Q</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Queensland</b>, species of ss. in, <a href="#Page_540">540</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Questions</b> yet undecided: the use of the rattle, <a href="#Page_294">294</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the ‘pit’, <i>doubles narines</i>, or <i>fosses lacrymales</i>, <a href="#Page_381">381</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘sleeping’ of ss., <a href="#Page_169">169</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">origin of the maternal refuge, <a href="#Page_505">505</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">nature of gigantic marine animals, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">R</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Raleigh</b>, Sir W., <a href="#Page_99">99</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Rambles</b> and Scrambles’ (Sullivan), <a href="#Page_419">419</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Rattells</b>, Indian charms, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Rattles" id="Rattles">Rattles</a></b>, their use, <a href="#Page_294">294</a>, <a href="#Page_307">307</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">speculations regarding, <a href="#Page_308">308</a>, <a href="#Page_311">311</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">their age, <a href="#Page_296">296</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">form and colour, <a href="#Page_296">296</a>, <a href="#Page_299">299</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">structure, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>, <a href="#Page_305">305</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Duméril’s conclusions, <a href="#Page_313">313</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Rattlesnake</b> dens, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>, <a href="#Page_301">301</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Redi" id="Redi">Redi</a></b>: <i>Osservazione intorno alle Vipere</i>, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">knew of the mobility of fangs, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Règne</b> animal, Cuvier, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Relations</b> of the World’, by the Pilgrim Purchas, <a href="#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Repose</b>; after food, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_235">235</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">as quiescence, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <a href="#Page_587">587</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">periodical (<i>see</i> <a href="#Hibernation">hibernation</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Reptiles</b>; how divided, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">definition of the name, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Reptiles</b> of British India’, by Dr. A. Günther, F.R.S., of the Br. M. (<i>see</i> <a href="#Gunther">Günther</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Reptiles</b>, Natural History of’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Gosse">Gosse</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Rerum</b> Naturalium Thesauri’ (Seba), <a href="#Page_278">278</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Rervm</b> Natvralivm Braziliæ’ (Marcgravius), <a href="#Page_397">397</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Respiration" id="Respiration">Respiration</a></b>; sometimes partial, <a href="#Page_144">144</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">cessation of, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">weak, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">when feeding, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in sea-ss., <a href="#Page_132">132</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Glottis">glottis</a>, <a href="#Hibernation">hibernation</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ribbon</b> fish, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <a href="#Page_250">250</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ribs</b>; action of, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">number of, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">expansion of, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Emotions">emotions</a>, <a href="#Feeding">feeding</a>, etc.);</p>
<p class="pnii">articulation of, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_608" id="Page_608">[608]</a></span></p><p class="pnii">in progression, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Ricerche</b> fisiche sopra il veleno della Vipere’ (by Felix Fontana, 1761), <a href="#Page_368">368</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Richards</b>, Dr. Vincent, experiments in artificial respiration, <a href="#Page_552">552</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Rocky</b> Mountains, cañons haunts of ss., <a href="#Page_162">162</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Roget" id="Roget">Roget</a></b>, P. M., quotes Hellmann, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">perception of touch in ss., <a href="#Page_195">195</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the spinal column, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Romance</b> of Natural History’ (Gosse), <a href="#Page_248">248</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>R.C.S.</b>, Museum of, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>, <a href="#Page_415">415</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Royal</b> Family, the, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Royal</b> herpetologists, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Ruskin" id="Ruskin">Ruskin</a></b>, Prof., lecture on ss., <a href="#Page_41">41</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">classical names of, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">movements, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Russell</b>, Lord Arthur, a herpetologist, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a friend of the Ophidia, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Ruthven</b>, S. S., Esq., of U.S., a large brood of ss., <a href="#Page_497">497</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">S</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>S.</b>’ Captain, bitten by a sea-s., <a href="#Page_241">241</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Saades</b> and Samp Wallahs, the, <a href="#Page_515">515</a>, <a href="#Page_522">522</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Salamanders</b>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Saleratus</b> an Am. remedy, <a href="#Page_553">553</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Saliva</b>, abundant, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Salivary" id="Salivary">Salivary</a></b> apparatus: of ss. complicated, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">an aid to digestion, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Salivation" id="Salivation">Salivation</a></b> of prey, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Saltatory</b> actions of ss., <a href="#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>, <a href="#Page_448">448</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Santos</b>, <i>pelamis bicolor</i> there, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Sao</b> Gabrielle, observations by Wallace, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Sauria</i>, the, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">saurians, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>, <a href="#Page_331">331</a>, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Saurophidians</i>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Scales" id="Scales">Scales</a></b>; illus. of, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_193">193</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_240">240</a>, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss. classified by, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">size of, <a href="#Page_337">337</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">head shields, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ventral, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Epidermis">epidermis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Sceva</b>, Mr., <a href="#Page_365">365</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Fayrer">Fayrer</a>).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Schlangen</b> und Schlangen Feind’ (H. O. Lenz), <a href="#Page_81">81</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Schlegel" id="Schlegel">Schlegel</a></b>, Herman: his work, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">salivary glands, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">an authority, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">doubts snakes drinking, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">power of tail, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vertebræ, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">fangs, <a href="#Page_362">362</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">involution of, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">action of, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">translation of his works, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Schliemann</b>, Dr., vegetable antidotes, <a href="#Page_524">524</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Schneck</b>, Dr. J., of U.S., on Heterodon, <a href="#Page_412">412</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Science</b> Gossip, <a href="#Page_490">490</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Science</b> News, <a href="#Page_411">411</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Sclater</b>, P. Lutley, Esq., F.R.S., Sec. to the Z. Soc., Lond.: the carinate birds, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a communication to, <a href="#Page_404">404</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the brood of boas, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Scorpione</i>, the, <a href="#Page_590">590</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Scutæ</b>, overlapping, <a href="#Page_194">194</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Scales">scales</a>, <a href="#Epidermis">epidermis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Sea-ss" id="Sea-ss">Sea</a></b> -ss., <a href="#Page_233">233</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Pelagic">Pelagic</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Sea-ser" id="Sea-ser"></a>Sea</b> -sers. hard to identify, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">gigantic marine forms seen, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">most frequent in the North Atlantic, <a href="#Page_252">252</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">probable hibernation of, <a href="#Page_253">253</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">not necessarily ‘monsters’, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">official reports of, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Mr. Bartlett on, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">speculations, <a href="#Page_264">264</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">existence still doubtful, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Searle</b>, Mr. E. W., on the brood of young boas, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Seba</b>, a crowing s., <a href="#Page_154">154</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the anaconda, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vernaculars of the rattlesnake, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Seh</b>, Fetish god, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Sensations</b>, complex, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in ss. dull, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Septic</b>, a, s. venom is, <a href="#Page_552">552</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Serpent</b>: of Cuvier, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of mythology, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_508">508</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘sting’ of, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Lord Bacon on, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the name defined, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">myths of, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">worship of, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_513">513</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">symbol, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Serpentes</b>’, of Topsell, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of Purchas, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Serpentine</b> movements, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Serpentum</b> Braziliensis’ (Wagler), <a href="#Page_383">383</a>, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Shakspeare</b>, his popularity, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">not a naturalist, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">contemporary literature, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">quotations from, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Shaler</b>, Prof., U.S., on natural selection, <a href="#Page_308">308</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Shell</b> -breaker, ‘Sunkerchor’, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Shields</b>, <a href="#Page_316">316</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Scales">scales</a>, <a href="#Epidermis">epidermis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Shortt</b>, Dr., of Madras, gives milk to snakes, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_609" id="Page_609">[609]</a></span></p><p class="pnii">approves of alcoholic remedies, <a href="#Page_550">550</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">claims originality with <i>liquor potassæ</i>, <a href="#Page_552">552</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Silliman’s</b> Journal of Science, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Skeleton</b>, of cobra, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of jaws, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Skin</b>, shedding of (<i>see</i> integument, <a href="#Epidermis">epidermis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Sleeping</b> after meals, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">with open eyes, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Sloane</b>, Sir Hans: ‘Inchantments’, etc., <a href="#Page_281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="pni">experiments, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Sloughing" id="Sloughing">Sloughing</a></b> of lizards, <a href="#Page_331">331</a>, <a href="#Page_481">481</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Epidermis">epidermis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Smith</b>, Dr. Andrew: egg-eaters, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his work, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Bucephali</i>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Smith</b>, a Mr., <i>Coluber smithii</i>, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Smith</b>, Captain John, the rattells, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Smith</b>, Prof. Lawrence, Pres. of the Am. Ass. (<i>see</i> <a href="#Convention">Convention on Snakes</a>), <a href="#Page_485">485</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Smith</b>, Sydney J., Esq., U.S., testimony, <a href="#Page_438">438</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Smithsonian</b> Contributions, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Smithsonian</b> Institution, Washington D.C., <a href="#Page_488">488</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Snakes</b> of Australia’ (Krefft), <a href="#Page_154">154</a>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Snakes</b>, Lectures on (<i>see</i> <a href="#Huxley">Huxley</a>, <a href="#Ruskin">Ruskin</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Snakes</b>: a home for, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_592">592</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">groups of, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">their place in nature, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">length of life, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">their uses, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">cruel packing of, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">powers of (<i>see</i> <a href="#Constriction">constriction</a>, <a href="#Huxley">deglutition</a>, <a href="#Dentition">dentition</a>, <a href="#Fangs">fangs</a>, <a href="#Glottis">glottis</a>, <a href="#Hibernation">hibernation</a>, <a href="#Progression">progression</a>, <a href="#Respiration">respiration</a>, <a href="#Teeth">teeth</a>, etc.);</p>
<p class="pnii">by name:</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>ABOMA</b>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>acanthophis</i>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>adder</i>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_392">392</a>, <a href="#Page_410">410</a>, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>, <a href="#Page_471">471</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>aglyphodontes</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>amphisbœna</i>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i><a name="anaconda" id="anaconda">anaconda</a></i>, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>, <a href="#Page_441">441</a>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>ancistrodon</i>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>, <a href="#Page_571">571</a>, <a href="#Page_572">572</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>anguis</i> 48, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_171">171</a>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>, <a href="#Page_346">346</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_410">410</a>, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_471">471</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>anholodontes</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>anodon</i>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_343">343</a>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>apistoglyphes</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>aproterodontes</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">asp, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>atropos</i>, <i>atrox</i>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>avusamans</i>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>BLACK</b> s., <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, as ‘<i>racer</i>’, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">‘<b>Blackie</b>’, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>blauser</i>, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>blindworm</i>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a> (<i>see</i> <i>anguis</i>);</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>boa</i>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a>, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_220">220</a>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_435">435</a>, <a href="#Page_584">584</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>boiginininga</i>, <i>boiguira</i>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>boicinininpeba</i>, <i>boycininga</i>, <a href="#Page_430">430</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>boodon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>boomslange</i>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>boschmeester</i>, <a href="#Page_420">420</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>bothrops</i>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>, <a href="#Page_426">426</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>brachyura</i>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>broad-scaled</i> s.,423;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i><a name="Bucephalus" id="Bucephalus">Bucephalus</a></i>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>bull</i> s., <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii">‘<i>bull-killer</i>’, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>bungarus</i>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_357">357</a>, <a href="#Page_501">501</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>bushmaster</i>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pnii">‘<b>CALICO</b>’ s., <a href="#Page_410">410</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>callophis</i>, <a href="#Page_537">537</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>camoudi</i>, <a href="#Page_420">420</a>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>Cape adder</i>, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>capra capella</i>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>carpet</i> s., <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cascavel</i>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cascobel</i>, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>caudalis</i>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>caudisona</i>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cecilia</i>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cenchris</i>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="#Page_562">562</a>, <a href="#Page_577">577</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cerastes</i>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="#Page_315">315</a>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>, <a href="#Page_324">324</a>, <a href="#Page_351">351</a>, <a href="#Page_389">389</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>chicken</i> s., <a href="#Page_439">439</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i><a name="chilobothrus" id="chilobothrus">chilobothrus</a></i>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>, <a href="#Page_437">437</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii">‘<b>Cleo</b>’, <b>Cleopatra</b>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_515">515</a>, <a href="#Page_525">525</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>clotho</i>, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>clothonia</i>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i><a name="cobra" id="cobra">cobra</a></i>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>, <a href="#Page_401">401</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <a href="#Page_502">502</a>, <a href="#Page_511">511</a>, <a href="#Page_517">517</a>, <a href="#Page_537">537</a>, <a href="#Page_543">543</a>, <a href="#Page_560">560</a>, <a href="#Page_578">578</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cœnicoussi</i>, <a href="#Page_420">420</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>coluber</i>, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="#Page_139">139</a>, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="#Page_208">208</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>, <a href="#Page_437">437</a>, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>, <a href="#Page_500">500</a>, <a href="#Page_567">567</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>colubri</i>, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>colubrines</i>, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>constrictor</i>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a>, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>, <a href="#Page_258">258</a>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>, <a href="#Page_438">438</a>, <a href="#Page_584">584</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cophias</i>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>copper-head</i>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>, <a href="#Page_392">392</a>, <a href="#Page_571">571</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>coral</i>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>coronella</i>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>, <a href="#Page_435">435</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>corral</i>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>counacouchi</i>, <i>counicouchi</i>, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>couroucoucou</i>, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>courracouchi</i>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>craspedocephalus</i>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>, <i>a seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>crebo</i>, <i>cribo</i>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i><a name="crotalidae" id="crotalidae">crotalidæ</a></i>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>, <a href="#Page_357">357</a>, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_362">362</a>, <a href="#Page_368">368</a>, <a href="#Page_381">381</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>, <a href="#Page_494">494</a>, <a href="#Page_503">503</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i><a name="crotalus" id="crotalus">crotalus</a></i>, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_269">269</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_375">375</a>, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <a href="#Page_426">426</a>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>, <a href="#Page_501">501</a>, <a href="#Page_519">519</a>, <a href="#Page_534">534</a>, <a href="#Page_541">541</a>, <a href="#Page_544">544</a>, <a href="#Page_553">553</a>, <a href="#Page_573">573</a>, <a href="#Page_574">574</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>crotalophorus</i>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>, <a href="#Page_393">393</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cucurijuba</i>, <i>curucucu</i>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cucuriù</i>, <i>cucuriubù</i>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>curucucu</i>, <a href="#Page_428">428</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cylindrophis</i>,188;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>cynodon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b><a name="DABOIA" id="DABOIA">DABOIA</a></b>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_365">365</a>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>, <a href="#Page_436">436</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>dasypeltis</i>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>deaf adder</i>, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>death adder</i>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>deer-swallower</i>, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>deirodon</i>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_412">412</a>, <a href="#Page_415">415</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>dendrophidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>diamond</i> s., <a href="#Page_384">384</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>domina serpentum</i>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>dryadidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>dryophidians</i>, <a href="#Page_325">325</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>dumb rattlesnake</i>, <a href="#Page_392">392</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_610" id="Page_610">[610]</a></span></p><p class="pniii"><i>durissus</i>, <a href="#Page_366">366</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>ECACOATL</b>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>echis</i>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>, <a href="#Page_351">351</a>, <a href="#Page_366">366</a>, <a href="#Page_389">389</a>, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <a href="#Page_537">537</a>, <a href="#Page_554">554</a>, <a href="#Page_580">580</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i><a name="elaphis" id="elaphis">elaphis</a></i>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_185">185</a>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_336">336</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>elapidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>, <a href="#Page_338">338</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>, <a href="#Page_362">362</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>, <a href="#Page_430">430</a>, <a href="#Page_535">535</a>, <a href="#Page_548">548</a>, <a href="#Page_567">567</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>el trago venado</i>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>enhydrina</i>, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>epicratis</i>, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>eryx</i>, <a href="#Page_220">220</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>eunectes</i>, <a href="#Page_456">456</a> (see <i><a href="#anaconda">anaconda</a></i>);</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>eutania</i>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>FER-DE-LANCE</b>, <a href="#Page_319">319</a>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>flammon</i>, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>four-rayed</i> s. (see <i><a href="#elaphis">elaphis</a></i>);</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>furia</i>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>GARTER</b> s., <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>geoptyas</i>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>glyphodon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>gokurrah</i>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>guiarranpiaquana</i>, <a href="#Page_430">430</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">great sea-ser., <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>green mamba</i>, <a href="#Page_154">154</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>HALYS</b>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i><a name="hamadryad" id="hamadryad">hamadryad</a></i>, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <a href="#Page_503">503</a>, <a href="#Page_567">567</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>herpetum</i>, <a href="#Page_326">326</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>heterodon</i>, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_395">395</a>, <a href="#Page_401">401</a>, <a href="#Page_403">403</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>hexacornis</i>, <a href="#Page_325">325</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>hoacoatl</i>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>holodontes</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>homalopsidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>hoop</i> s., <a href="#Page_184">184</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>hopplocephalus</i>, <a href="#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>horn</i> s., <i>horned</i> v., <a href="#Page_224">224</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>horse-shoe</i> s., <a href="#Page_137">137</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>hydrinus</i>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="#Page_243">243</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>hydrophidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>IARARACA</b>, <i>iararacuassa</i>, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>, <a href="#Page_535">535</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>ibibo</i>, <i>ibiboco</i>, <i>ibiboboca</i>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>, <a href="#Page_430">430</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>ibiracua</i>, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>, <a href="#Page_538">538</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>iffulu</i>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>isodon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>isodontiens</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>JACULUS</b>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>jacumama</i>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>Jamaica</i> boa, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_119">119</a> (see <i><a href="#chilobothrus">chilobothrus</a></i>);</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>jararaca</i>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <a href="#Page_402">402</a>, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <a href="#Page_426">426</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>jarraracca</i>, <i>jararacussu</i>, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>, <a href="#Page_406">406</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>jararacucu</i>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>jararacpeba</i>, <a href="#Page_430">430</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>jeboia</i>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>KALA-SAMP</b>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>kamoudi</i>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>keautiah</i>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">king-snake, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>krait</i>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>kunikusi</i>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>LACERTINES</b>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>, <a href="#Page_570">570</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>lachesis</i>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_357">357</a>, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_365">365</a>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_401">401</a>, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_426">426</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_556">556</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>langaha</i>, <a href="#Page_325">325</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>liophis</i>, <a href="#Page_332">332</a>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>, <a href="#Page_410">410</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">‘Lizzie’, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_470">470</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>lophophrys</i>, <a href="#Page_325">325</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>lycodon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>MAMBA</b>, <a href="#Page_154">154</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>mangeur de rats</i>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>matatoro</i>, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>massasauga</i>, <a href="#Page_393">393</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>megæra</i>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>mocassin</i>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="#Page_410">410</a>, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>, <a href="#Page_571">571</a> (see <i><a href="#tropidontus">Tropidontus</a></i>);</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>morelia</i>, <a href="#Page_384">384</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>NAG SAMP</b>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>naja</i>, <a href="#Page_154">154</a>, <a href="#Page_328">328</a>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a> (see <i><a href="#cobra">cobra</a></i>), <a href="#Page_580">580</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>nasicornis</i>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>natrix</i>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_138">138</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#ring-s">ring-s.</a>, <i><a href="#tropidontus">Tropidontus</a></i>).</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>OGMODON</b>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>oligodon</i>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_343">343</a>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>ophiophagus</i>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <a href="#Page_565">565</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#elaphis">Elaps</a>, <a href="#hamadryad">Hamadryad</a>).</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>PASSERITA</b>, <a href="#Page_325">325</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>pelagic</i> ss., <a href="#Page_233">233</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>pelamis</i>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>pelias</i>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>, <a href="#Page_505">505</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>pilot</i>-s., <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>pine</i>-s., <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>pit</i>-vs., <a href="#Page_176">176</a> (see <i><a href="#crotalidae">crotalidæ</a></i>);</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>pituophis</i>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>platurus</i>, <a href="#Page_243">243</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>prickly</i>-s., <a href="#Page_175">175</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>proteroglyphes</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>psamophis</i>, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>pseudechis</i>, <a href="#Page_548">548</a>, <a href="#Page_560">560</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i><a name="ptyas" id="ptyas">ptyas</a></i>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_332">332</a>, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#rat-s">rats</a>.);</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>puffadder</i>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_358">358</a>, <a href="#Page_562">562</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>python</i>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>, <a href="#Page_443">443</a>, <a href="#Page_446">446</a>, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>, <a href="#Page_583">583</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pnii"><b>RACER</b>, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>rachiodon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>raetel-schlange</i>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><a name="rat-s" id="rat-s">rat-s</a>., <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a> (see <i><a href="#ptyas">Ptyas</a></i>);</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>rat-tail</i> s., <a href="#Page_177">177</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>rativoro</i>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">rattle-s., <a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_193">193</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>, <a href="#Page_307">307</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>, <a href="#Page_394">394</a>, <a href="#Page_487">487</a>, <a href="#Page_496">496</a>, <a href="#Page_501">501</a>, <a href="#Page_509">509</a>, <a href="#Page_521">521</a>, <a href="#Page_541">541</a>, <a href="#Page_549">549</a>, <a href="#Page_563">563</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (see <i><a href="#crotalus">crotalus</a></i>);</p>
<p class="pniii">red adder, <a href="#Page_392">392</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><a name="ring-s" id="ring-s">ring-s.</a>, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <a href="#Page_566">566</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>river</i>-s., <a href="#Page_223">223</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>river Jack</i>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>rudis</i>, <i>la rude</i>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>Russell’s</i> v., <a href="#Page_436">436</a> (see <i><a href="#DABOIA">Daboia</a></i>).</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>SCHLANGE</b>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">sea-ser., <a href="#Page_248">248</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>serpente</i>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>sea-snakes</i>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a> (see <i><a href="#Pelagic">Pelagic</a></i>);</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>sepedon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a></p>
<p class="pniii"><i>serpentes à sonnettes</i>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>seven-banded</i> s., <a href="#Page_437">437</a>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>shiraraca</i>, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>simotes</i>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>slow</i>-worm, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>, <a href="#Page_330">330</a>, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> ‘<a href="#Lizzie">Lizzie’</a>);</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>solenoglyphes</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>sorococo</i>, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>spilotes</i>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>sucariuba</i>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>surucurù</i>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>surukuku</i>, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>surucujù</i>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>TANGADOR</b>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>teuchlacotzauhqui</i>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>teutlacocauehqui</i>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>thanatophides</i>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>thorn-tail</i>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>toboba</i>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>tomodon</i>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>tortrix</i>, <a href="#Page_220">220</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">‘<b>Totsey</b>’, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_611" id="Page_611">[611]</a></span></p><p class="pniii"><i>trigonocephalus</i>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="#Page_319">319</a>, <a href="#Page_373">373</a>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>, <a href="#Page_392">392</a>, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>trimuresuri</i>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i><a name="tropidontus" id="tropidontus">tropidontus</a></i>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="#Page_437">437</a>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_571">571</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>two-headed</i> s., <a href="#Page_187">187</a>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>typhlops</i>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>URICANA</b>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>urocrotalon</i>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>uropeltis</i>, <a href="#Page_188">188</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>uropsophus</i>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>VAIA</b>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>viperidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>, <a href="#Page_368">368</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">v. <i>atropos</i>, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">v. <i>aquatica</i>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">v. <i>arietans</i>, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">v. <i>caudisona</i>, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pniii">v. <i>elegans</i>, <a href="#Page_339">339</a>, <a href="#Page_436">436</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>vipera</i>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_433">433</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>vipers</i>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>, <a href="#Page_324">324</a>, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_371">371</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>, <a href="#Page_432">432</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">v. <i>berus</i>, <a href="#Page_441">441</a>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">v. <i>caudalis</i>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">v. <i>cornuta</i>, <a href="#Page_322">322</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">v. <i>nasicornis</i>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>, <a href="#Page_324">324</a>, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_436">436</a>, <a href="#Page_441">441</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii">v. <i>rhinosceros</i>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>vivera de la cruz</i>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>WATER MOCASIN</b>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>water rattle-s.</i>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>water-ss.</i>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>water-v.</i>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>;</p>
<p class="pniii"><i>whip-s.</i>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>.</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>XENODON</b>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_395">395</a>, <a href="#Page_401">401</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pnii"><b>YELLOW BOA</b>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a> (see <i><a href="#chilobothrus">Chilobothrus</a></i>).</p>

<p class="pnii"><b>ZAMENIS</b>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Sound</b>, ss. affected by, <a href="#Page_525">525</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Specimens</b>, badly-prepared, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Spencer</b>, Edmund, ‘Fairie Queen’, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Spine" id="Spine">Spine</a></b>, pliancy of, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">joints of, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">peculiar processes, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus., <a href="#Page_68">68</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Adaptation">adaptation</a>, <a href="#Anatomy">anatomy</a>, <a href="#Vertebrae">vertebræ</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Spittle</b> from the Bag’ (1670), <a href="#Page_556">556</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">tasted and tested, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Spix</b> and Martin; ‘Travels in Brazil’, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>jararacas</i>, <i>ib.</i> 427.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Sprengle</b>, Mr. C. J., letter to the R. Soc. (1722), <a href="#Page_280">280</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">experiments with vipers, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Springing</b> teeth’, <a href="#Page_282">282</a>, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Squires</b>, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Sting</b>:’ of a snake, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of the tail, <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the word defined, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Stradling</b>, Arthur, Esq., M.D., C.M.Z.S. etc., cannibalism, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">tongues of ss., <a href="#Page_127">127</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">effect of warmth, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the ‘Cribo’, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sensitiveness of tail, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Totsey’, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus. of, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">movements of ss., <a href="#Page_217">217</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">carried down by floods, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sea-ss. in the Atlantic, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">can they climb? 239;</p>
<p class="pnii">valuable specimens, <a href="#Page_339">339</a>, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>crotalus</i> bite, <a href="#Page_366">366</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a gift to the Z. Gardens, <a href="#Page_398">398</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">C.M.Z.S., <a href="#Page_399">399</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">investigations, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">pseudo-fangs, <a href="#Page_405">405</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vernaculars, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">confusion in names, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ring s. incubating, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">an ‘affectionate’ snake, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">an eligible offer, <a href="#Page_521">521</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ss. insensible to music, <a href="#Page_526">526</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘fascination’, <a href="#Page_530">530</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">antidotes, <a href="#Page_534">534</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">venoms differ chemically, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">fangs protective, <a href="#Page_536">536</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">disintegrating power of venom, <a href="#Page_557">557</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Stridulating</b> apparatus, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Styng</b>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Sucking</b>; of eggs doubted, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of cows and women impossible, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">by suction, <a href="#Page_90">90</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the process watched, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Suites</b> de Buffon’, <a href="#Page_80">80</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Dumeril">Duméril</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Sullivan</b>, ‘Rambles in Essequibo’, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Sun</b> and Serpent Worship’ (J. S. Phené), <a href="#Page_514">514</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Swallowing</b> (<i>see</i> deglutition): vipers, their young? 483, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Swim</b> -bladder, the, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Swimming" id="Swimming">Swimming</a></b>, action of, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Water">water-ss.</a>, <a href="#Sea-ss">sea-ss.</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni">Synonyms, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a plague to students, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a stumbling-block to writers, <a href="#Page_395">395</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_418">418</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the derivations useful, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">T</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Tail" id="Tail">Tail</a></b>; horny tip, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘stinging’, <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘mischievous’, <a href="#Page_171">171</a>, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">feelings expressed by, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_179">179</a>, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="#Page_587">587</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">prehensile, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="#Page_233">233</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">length varies, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sensitiveness, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of burrowing ss., <a href="#Page_188">188</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a propeller, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_233">233</a>, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">power of, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_587">587</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a fulcrum, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>, <a href="#Page_473">473</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Lachesis</i>, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of <i>Xenodon</i>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of tree-ss., <a href="#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of water-ss., <a href="#Page_223">223</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_233">233</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of rattlesnakes (<i>see</i> <a href="#Rattles">rattle</a>);</p>
<p class="pnii">sloughs, <a href="#Page_336">336</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">how discarded, <a href="#Page_337">337</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_612" id="Page_612">[612]</a></span></p><p class="pnii">illus., <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_188">188</a>, <a href="#Page_296">296</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Tasmania</b>;</p>
<p class="pnii">broad-scaled ss., <a href="#Page_423">423</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Taste</b>; dull, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">assisted by the tongue, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_528">528</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Huxley on, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Taxidermy</b>, formerly bad, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Tayle</b>’, the, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Taylor</b>, Colonel Meadows, Indian castes, <a href="#Page_513">513</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Teeth" id="Teeth">Teeth</a></b>; as holders, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">six rows, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_343">343</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">claw-shaped, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_344">344</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">for grasping, <a href="#Page_34">34</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">replacement of, <a href="#Page_344">344</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">gradations in, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">specialties, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">illus., <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">exceeding fineness of, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sometimes absent, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Dentition">dentition</a>, <a href="#Fangs">fangs</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Telegraph</b> cable, the, sea-s. caught in, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Templer</b>, Mr., catching a ‘Larke’, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Tennant" id="Tennant">Tennant</a></b>, Sir Emerson; sea-ss. near Ceylon, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">affection of cobras, <a href="#Page_502">502</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Texas</b>; cannibal ss. observed, <a href="#Page_571">571</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Thanatophidia</b>, the’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Fayrer">Fayrer</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Todd</b>, ‘Cyclopædia of Anatomy’, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Tombes</b>, Charles, Esq., M.A., ‘On the Succession of Poison Fangs’, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_365">365</a>, <a href="#Page_373">373</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Tongue" id="Tongue">Tongue</a></b>; sensitiveness, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">use in drinking, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘a sting’, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">not a brush, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a feeler, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">position of, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">activity, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">colour, <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Shakspeare on, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of journalists, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of sea-ss., <a href="#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Topsell</b>; his ‘Serpentes’, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_477">477</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his Natural History’, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Torpor</b>, period of, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">variable, <a href="#Page_163">163</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Hibernation">hibernation</a>, <a href="#Respiration">respiration</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Torquata</b>, the collar, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Tortoise</b>; an ‘insect’, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">vulgarly ‘turtle’, <i>ib.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Tortugas</b>, sea-ss. off, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Trachea</b>, <a href="#Page_133">133</a> (<i>see</i> windpipe, <a href="#Glottis">glottis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Traill</b>, Dr. Thos. Stewart, translator of Schlegel’s work, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Transactions</b>; of the Royal Society (<i>see</i> <a href="#Philosophical">Phil. Trans</a>.);</p>
<p class="pnii">of the Z. Soc., <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>, <a href="#Page_592">592</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Travels</b> in the Amazon’, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Travels</b> in Brazil’ (Spix and Martin), <a href="#Page_397">397</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Travels</b> in Peru’ (Tschudi), <a href="#Page_419">419</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Travels</b> Round the World’ (Kingston), <a href="#Page_418">418</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Tree</b> ss., <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>, <a href="#Page_430">430</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Tropical</b> World’ (Hartwig), <a href="#Page_418">418</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Tropidos</b>, the keel, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Tschudi" id="Tschudi">Tschudi</a></b>, the <i>Flammon</i> of Peru, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Tyrrell" id="Tyrrell">Tyrrell</a></b>, keeper at the Reptilium, a witness, <a href="#Page_185">185</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">an assistant, <a href="#Page_402">402</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Z.G.">Zoo. Gardens</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Tyson</b>, Dr. Edward; dissection of <i>Vipera caudisona</i>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the larynx, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">on the ‘pit’, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">volitionary action of <a href="#Fangs">fangs</a>, <a href="#Page_370">370</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Philosophical">Phil. Trans. 1683</a>).</p>

<p class="pind">U</p>

<p class="pni"><b>United</b> States of America;</p>
<p class="pnii">Association for the Advancement of Science, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Science Convention on Snakes, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Exploring Expeditions, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_291">291</a>, <a href="#Page_293">293</a>, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">official Reports to Congress, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_291">291</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Dr. Elliott Coues, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>, <a href="#Page_394">394</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">herpetologists of, quoted, De Kay, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Emmons, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Holbrooke, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Dr. Weir Mitchel, <a href="#Page_535">535</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">F. W. Putnam, and the members of the Con., <a href="#Page_485">485</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">ophiological experiments (<i>see</i> Coues, Mitchel, <a href="#Putnam">Putnam</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pind">V</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Valenciennes</b>; on the py., <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Vallée</b> gave drink to the py., <a href="#Page_79">79</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Valley</b> of Wyoming infested with ss., <a href="#Page_289">289</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Veleno</b>, <i>il della vipera</i> (Fontana, 1767), <a href="#Page_368">368</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Venner</b>, Elsie, <a href="#Page_301">301</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Venom</b>; varies in ss., <a href="#Page_534">534</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">intensity of, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>, <a href="#Page_537">537</a>, <a href="#Page_533">533</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">remedies for, <a href="#Page_552">552</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">modes of treatment, <a href="#Page_545">545</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Fayrer">Fayrer</a>, <a href="#Mitchell">Mitchell</a>, etc. etc.).</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Vernaculars" id="Vernaculars">Vernaculars</a></b>, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Stradling on, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Vertebrae" id="Vertebrae">Vertebræ</a></b>; of <i>Deirodon</i>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_613" id="Page_613">[613]</a></span></p><p class="pnii">number of joints, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">articulation, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">capabilities of, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_587">587</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">distinctions in, <a href="#Page_211">211</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Spine">spine</a>, <a href="#Constriction">constriction</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Vestiges</b> of limbs, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in anaconda, <a href="#Page_220">220</a>, <a href="#Page_453">453</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">in form of ‘claws’, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Darwin on, <a href="#Page_326">326</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Huxley on, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Vibratile</b>; action of fangs, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>, <a href="#Page_375">375</a>, <a href="#Page_403">403</a>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">of tail, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_587">587</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Vibration</b> through solids affects ss., <a href="#Page_526">526</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Virginia</b>, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Generall Historie of’, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Account of’, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘History of’ (Beverley), <a href="#Page_281">281</a>, (Howe), <a href="#Page_289">289</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">old writers on, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">adventures in, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Viviparous</b>, <a href="#Page_431">431</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">not peculiar to vs., <a href="#Page_433">433</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Incubation">incubation</a>, <a href="#Gestation">gestation</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Voice</b>, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>, <i>et seq.</i> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Breathing">breathing</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Voyage</b> of the <i>Alceste</i>’, Captain M’Leod, <a href="#Page_111">111</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">W</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wagler</b>; <i>eunectes</i>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a herpetologist, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">not trustworthy, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wales</b>, H. R. H. the Prince of, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wales</b>;</p>
<p class="pnii">numbers of ss. in, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a ‘venomous’ worm in, <a href="#Page_480">480</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wallaby</b> hunters, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wallace</b>, A. R., F.R.S., etc.; a half-strangled boa, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>crotalidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_382">382</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">sound of rattle, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Jararaca</i>, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Surucurù</i>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Wanderings</b>’ (<i>see</i> <a href="#Waterton">Waterton</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Washington</b>, D. C., Smithsonian Contributions, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Water" id="Water">Water</a></b> ss., <a href="#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Waterton" id="Waterton">Waterton</a></b>, Charles, Esq.; the <i>Counacouchi</i>, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">high colouring, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a stumbling-block, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Webster</b>, Noah;</p>
<p class="pnii">a doubtful snake, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Western</b> World’, the (Kingston), <a href="#Page_418">418</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Whisky</b>; a popular remedy, <a href="#Page_548">548</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">enormous doses, <a href="#Page_549">549</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">approved by Halford, <a href="#Page_550">550</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Mitchell, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Shortt, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">generally efficacious, <a href="#Page_549">549</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>White</b>, Gilbert; believed the maternal affection of vipers, <a href="#Page_490">490</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Whydah</b>, py. deities at, <a href="#Page_514">514</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Wild</b> Life’ (Du Chaillu), <a href="#Page_186">186</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wilson</b>, Dr. Andrew; reptiles not highly organized, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">unscientific observers, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">imaginary sea-ser., <a href="#Page_250">250</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">abnormal developments, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wind</b> -pipe, the, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">with a volitionary action, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Owen on, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">formation of, <a href="#Page_133">133</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">length, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Tyson on, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Duméril, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">observations, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">muscles of, <a href="#Page_141">141</a> (<i>see</i> <a href="#Glottis">glottis</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wood</b> (‘Natural History’); the slow-worm, <a href="#Page_453">453</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Woodward</b>, the Messrs., ‘South Africa’, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pni"><b>Worcester</b>; a doubtful s., <a href="#Page_397">397</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Worms</b>, gigantic, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the Laidley, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">occasionally ‘venomous’, <a href="#Page_480">480</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wright</b>; a doubtful snake, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Wrongly</b> -named’, <a href="#Page_470">470</a> (<i>see</i> ‘<a href="#Lizzie">Lizzie’</a>).</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wucherer</b>, Dr., on <i>Xenodon</i>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_401">401</a>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">tree ss. 219;</p>
<p class="pnii">C.M.Z.S., <a href="#Page_401">401</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Surucucus</i>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Wyman</b>, Professor, U.S., gastric juice of ss., <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">Y</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Yarmouth</b>, sea-sers. at, <a href="#Page_252">252</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Yates</b>, F. H., Esq., ‘History of Egypt’, how ss. insert venom, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Yawning</b>; after meals, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">quite a business, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">position of jaws when, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_136">136</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">opportunities for inspection, <a href="#Page_136">136</a>, <a href="#Page_139">139</a>.</p>

<p class="pind">Z</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Zambesi</b>, Expedition to the (Livingstone), <a href="#Page_230">230</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Zeuglodontia</i>, the, imaginary sea-ser., <a href="#Page_249">249</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Zimmermann</b>, Professor (1800) incipient rattles, <a href="#Page_299">299</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b><a name="Z.G." id="Z.G."></a>Zoological</b> Gardens, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Royal ophiophilists, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a boon, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">blanket swallowed, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">cannibals, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the ‘moccasins’, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="#Page_572">572</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">lectures at, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">eggs for food, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the tanks, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>;</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_614" id="Page_614">[614]</a></span></p><p class="pnii">snakes drinking, <a href="#Page_92">92</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">actions of snakes in water, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">gossip, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_585">585</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">old coats, <a href="#Page_193">193</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a means of instruction, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>, <a href="#Page_441">441</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">What can it be? 129;</p>
<p class="pnii">the air tube, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">hibernation, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">observations, <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>, <a href="#Page_528">528</a>, <a href="#Page_561">561</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">baby vipers, <a href="#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_432">432</a>, <a href="#Page_499">499</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">acrobatic performances, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">seizing the opportunity, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">length of anaconda, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Mr. Bartlett of, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_322">322</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">interrupted studies, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">snakes born there, <a href="#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_436">436</a>, <i>et seq.</i>, <a href="#Page_499">499</a>, <a href="#Page_500">500</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">important additions, <a href="#Page_398">398</a>, <a href="#Page_402">402</a>, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>, <a href="#Page_520">520</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a newly-hatched brood, <a href="#Page_500">500</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a sudden thought, <i>ib.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘Totsey’, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">slow-worms climbing, <a href="#Page_482">482</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">fascination, <a href="#Page_528">528</a>, <a href="#Page_578">578</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">tame ss., <a href="#Page_515">515</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">casting the cuticle, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii"><i>Heterodons</i>, <a href="#Page_411">411</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Xenodons</i>, <a href="#Page_402">402</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">notes from the Z.G., <a href="#Page_562">562</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the <i>Ophiophagus</i>, <a href="#Page_565">565</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a Government agent, <a href="#Page_570">570</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">relative poisons, <a href="#Page_575">575</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘coiling’, <a href="#Page_573">573</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">dinner time, <a href="#Page_582">582</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the blankets, <a href="#Page_588">588</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the keepers’ risks, <a href="#Page_564">564</a>, <a href="#Page_588">588</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the Heloderm, <a href="#Page_589">589</a>, <i>et seq.</i>;</p>
<p class="pnii">‘horrid’, <a href="#Page_591">591</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">the new Reptilium, <a href="#Page_592">592</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Zoological</b> Journal’ (1826), edited by Bell; Broderip on lubrication, <a href="#Page_113">113</a>, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">his observations confirmed by Bell, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Zoological</b> Miscellany’, the (J. E. Gray, ed.), <i>Crotalidæ</i>, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Zoological</b> myths, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Zoological</b> Notes’ (Arthur Nicols, Esq.), <a href="#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="#Page_310">310</a>, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Zoological</b> Proceedings, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_401">401</a>, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <a href="#Page_456">456</a>, <a href="#Page_497">497</a>, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Zoological</b> Society, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Cantor, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">A. R. Wallace, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Dr. Edwardes Crispe, <a href="#Page_490">490</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Zoological</b> Society;</p>
<p class="pnii">Council of, Professor Bell, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_493">493</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a fortuitous arrival, <a href="#Page_322">322</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">Sec. of, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Zoological</b> Society, C.M. of, <a href="#Page_399">399</a>, <a href="#Page_401">401</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Zoological</b> Transactions, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <a href="#Page_516">516</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><i>Zoologist</i>, the, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <a href="#Page_490">490</a>, <a href="#Page_492">492</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Zoology</b>;</p>
<p class="pnii">a progressive science, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>;</p>
<p class="pnii">assisted by observations (<i>see</i> <a href="#Convention">Convention</a>, <a href="#Florence">Florence</a>, <a href="#Philosophical">Phil. Trans.</a>, <a href="#Z.G.">Z. G.</a>, etc.).</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Zoology</b>’, Carpenter’s, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Zoology</b> of New York’ (De Kay), <a href="#Page_85">85</a>.</p>

<p class="pni">‘<b>Zoology</b> of South Africa’, Andrew Smith, M.D., F.Z.S., <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>.</p>

<p class="pni"><b>Zurich</b>, Gesner, Professor at, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>.</p>

<p class="pc4 lmid">THE END.</p>

<p class="pc4 reduct">MORRISON AND GIBB, EDINBURGH,<br />
PRINTERS TO HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE.</p>

<hr class="chap" />

</div>

<div class="chapter">

<h2 class="p4">FOOTNOTES:</h2>

<div class="footnotes">

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a></span>
<i>Aunt Jenny’s American Pets.</i> By Catherine C. Hopley.
London, 1872.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a></span>
‘Snakes and their Food,’ <i>Modern Thought</i>, Jan. 1881, in
reply to a paper in <i>Time</i> of the previous September.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a></span>
<i>Odontography.</i> By Richard Owen. London.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></a></span>
<i>Essai sur la Physionomie des Serpents.</i> Par Herman
Schlegel. Paris, 1837.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a></span>
<i>Règne Animal</i>, p. 108. Paris.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a></span>
January 1882.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a></span>
I have ventured to coin this word for the cages and
buildings likely to be required in parks and gardens for pet snakes, so
notably growing in popularity.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a></span>
<i>Thanatophidia of India</i>, 1st ed. 1872.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a></span>
<i>Ib.</i> 2d ed. p. 6. 1874.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a></span>
<i>Zoology of South Africa</i>, by Dr. A. Smith. 1849.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a></span>
<i>Odontography</i>, by Richard Owen, 1840, and <i>Anatomy of
the Vertebrates</i>, 1866.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a></span>
<i>Natural History Notes from South Africa</i>, by R. B. and
J. D. S. Woodward. Lond. 1874.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a></span>
See <i>Aunt Judy’s Magazine</i>, Aug. 1874, London,&mdash;‘The
Deirodon, or neck-toothed snake.’</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a></span>
<i>British Reptiles</i>, by Thomas Bell, F.L.S., etc. 1849.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a></span>
<i>Physiognomie des serpents</i>, p. 97. Par H. Schlegel.
Amsterdam, 1837.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></a></span>
<i>Annales des sciences naturelles</i>, 2d Series, tome xvi.
Paris, 1841.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">[17]</span></a></span>
<i>Erpétologie genéral</i>, par MM. Dumeril et Bibron, tome i.
p. 136. Paris, 1844.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a></span>
<i>Schlangen und Schlangen fiend</i>, par II. O. Lenz. Gotha,
1832.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">[19]</span></a></span>
<i>Sea Snakes: Pelagic Serpents</i>, by Dr. Theo. E. Cantor.
London, 1842. Zoological Society’s <i>Transactions</i>, 1841.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a></span>
See <i>Field</i> newspaper, September and October 1862.
London.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a></span>
<i>Zoology of New York</i>, by J. E. De Kay. Albany, 1844.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a></span>
<i>Natural History of New York.</i> 5 vols. New York, 1842.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a></span>
<i>North American Herpetology.</i> Phil., U. S., 1842.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a></span>
<i>History of Carolina</i>, by Jno. Lawson, 1709.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a></span>
Balfour’s <i>British India</i>; also the <i>Cyclopedia of
India</i>.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a></span>
See <i>Medical Times</i>, 1872, p. 730.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a></span>
<i>Reptiles of British India</i>, by Dr. A. Günther, F.R.S.
London, 1864.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a></span>
<i>Indian Snakes</i>, by E. Nicholson, Madras Army. Madras,
1870.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a></span>
<i>Natural History of Reptiles</i>, by P. H. Gosse. 1850.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a></span>
<i>Encyclopedia Britannica</i>, 1859, see art. ‘Reptilia,’ p.
47.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_31_31" id="Footnote_31_31"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_31"><span class="label">[31]</span></a></span>
<i>Ibid.</i> p. 47.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_32_32" id="Footnote_32_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_32"><span class="label">[32]</span></a></span>
Author of <i>Zoological Researches</i>, and <i>Leaves from the
Notebook of a Naturalist</i>.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_33_33" id="Footnote_33_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_33"><span class="label">[33]</span></a></span>
In the ‘Laidley Worm,’ exhibited at the Grosvenor Gallery
in 1881, the artist must have copied one of these.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_34_34" id="Footnote_34_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_34"><span class="label">[34]</span></a></span>
<i>Elementary Lessons in Physiology.</i> London, 1875.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_35_35" id="Footnote_35_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_35"><span class="label">[35]</span></a></span>
Tome i. p. 126 of <i>Erpétologie générale</i>.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_36_36" id="Footnote_36_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_36"><span class="label">[36]</span></a></span>
<i>Ibid.</i> p. 135.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_37_37" id="Footnote_37_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_37"><span class="label">[37]</span></a></span>
Tome vi. p. 100 of <i>Erpétologie générale</i>.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_38_38" id="Footnote_38_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_38"><span class="label">[38]</span></a></span>
<i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, vol. xiii. p. 25. 1684.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_39_39" id="Footnote_39_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_39"><span class="label">[39]</span></a></span>
<i>Erpétologie générale</i>, tome vi. p. 177 <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_40_40" id="Footnote_40_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_40"><span class="label">[40]</span></a></span>
<i>Erpétologie générale</i>, tome i. p. 180.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_41_41" id="Footnote_41_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_41"><span class="label">[41]</span></a></span>
<i>American Naturalist</i>, vol. ix.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_42_42" id="Footnote_42_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_42"><span class="label">[42]</span></a></span>
<i>Missionary Travels in South Africa</i>, by David
Livingstone.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_43_43" id="Footnote_43_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43_43"><span class="label">[43]</span></a></span>
<i>Snakes of Australia</i>, by Gerard Krefft.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_44_44" id="Footnote_44_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44_44"><span class="label">[44]</span></a></span>
<i>Life in the South</i>, vol. i. p. 260. By Catherine C.
Hopley. Lond. 1862.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_45_45" id="Footnote_45_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45_45"><span class="label">[45]</span></a></span>
Dumeril et Bibron’s <i>Erpétologie générale</i>, tome vi. p.
186.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_46_46" id="Footnote_46_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46_46"><span class="label">[46]</span></a></span>
<i>Travels in the Amazons</i>, p. 47. By A. R. Wallace.
London, 1853.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_47_47" id="Footnote_47_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47_47"><span class="label">[47]</span></a></span>
<i>Erpétologie générale</i>, tome vi. p. 184.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_48_48" id="Footnote_48_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48_48"><span class="label">[48]</span></a></span>
<i>Ibid.</i> tome i. p. 180.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_49_49" id="Footnote_49_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49_49"><span class="label">[49]</span></a></span>
Dumeril et Bibron, tome vi. p. 184.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_50_50" id="Footnote_50_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50_50"><span class="label">[50]</span></a></span>
<i>Pseudoxia; or, Vulgar Errours</i>, Book iii. p. 207. By Sir
Thomas Browne.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_51_51" id="Footnote_51_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51_51"><span class="label">[51]</span></a></span>
<i>Snakes of Australia</i>, by Gerard Krefft.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_52_52" id="Footnote_52_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52_52"><span class="label">[52]</span></a></span>
<i>The Natural History of Carolina</i>, by Mark Catesby.
London, 1731.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_53_53" id="Footnote_53_53"></a><a href="#FNanchor_53_53"><span class="label">[53]</span></a></span>
The vipers in the London Gardens labelled <i>Cenchris
piscivorus</i> have <i>not</i> the thorny tail, nor are they fish eaters. Nor
can the spectator form any idea of their swimming capacities, their
dark, narrow tank barely enabling them to extend themselves full
length. Herpetologists differ in assigning the above name, and in
deciding which is really the ‘Thorn-tail’ or ‘Horn snake’ of Lawson
and Catesby. Those at the Zoological Gardens, notwithstanding their
specific name, are never regaled on fish.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_54_54" id="Footnote_54_54"></a><a href="#FNanchor_54_54"><span class="label">[54]</span></a></span>
<i>Reptiles of British India.</i></p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_55_55" id="Footnote_55_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55_55"><span class="label">[55]</span></a></span>
Dr. A. Stradling affirms that these two snakes do not
invariably molest each other. He had the Rat-tail (<i>Fer de lance</i>) and
two <i>Cribos</i> with others in one cage, living on peaceful terms.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_56_56" id="Footnote_56_56"></a><a href="#FNanchor_56_56"><span class="label">[56]</span></a></span>
<i>Erpélogie générale</i>, tome i. p. 47.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_57_57" id="Footnote_57_57"></a><a href="#FNanchor_57_57"><span class="label">[57]</span></a></span>
<i>Essai sur la physiognomie des serpents</i>, par Herman
Schlegel. Amsterdam, 1837.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_58_58" id="Footnote_58_58"></a><a href="#FNanchor_58_58"><span class="label">[58]</span></a></span>
<i>Curiosities of Natural History</i>, by F. Buckland.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_59_59" id="Footnote_59_59"></a><a href="#FNanchor_59_59"><span class="label">[59]</span></a></span>
<i>Anatomy of the Vertebrates</i>, p. 260.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_60_60" id="Footnote_60_60"></a><a href="#FNanchor_60_60"><span class="label">[60]</span></a></span>
Since the above was in type, I have on several
occasions observed vertical coils in constricting snakes. Twice a
python constricted an animal in <i>distinct vertical coils</i>. I drew the
attention of Keeper Tyrrell to this, and we were both convinced that
no lateral coils whatever were used. On another occasion, while Mr.
Elwes was studying the action of <i>Elaphis quater-radiatus</i> for the
illustration, p. 205, its coils were entirely vertical, <i>not</i> lateral.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_61_61" id="Footnote_61_61"></a><a href="#FNanchor_61_61"><span class="label">[61]</span></a></span>
<i>A Naturalist in Jamaica</i>, by P. H. Gosse.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_62_62" id="Footnote_62_62"></a><a href="#FNanchor_62_62"><span class="label">[62]</span></a></span>
<i>Pseudoxia</i>, Book iii. chap. xx. p. 155.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_63_63" id="Footnote_63_63"></a><a href="#FNanchor_63_63"><span class="label">[63]</span></a></span>
Since this was in type, I find that not even a porcupine
is safe from a hungry snake. In vol. xliii. of the <i>Philosophical
Transactions</i> (1744), p. 271, is a letter from a gentleman in India,
who states that on an island near Bombay a dead snake was found with
the quills of a porcupine ‘sticking out of its Belly.’ The snake had
‘sucked it in Head foremost, while the Quills were flatted down.
Afterwards they rose and ran through the Snake’s Belly, and so killed
it.’ The pressure of the jaws had ‘flatted’ the quills, but not killed
the animal, which, when in its expansile tomb, had, though vainly,
erected its natural armour.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_64_64" id="Footnote_64_64"></a><a href="#FNanchor_64_64"><span class="label">[64]</span></a></span>
Owen’s <i>Anatomy of the Vertebrates</i>, p. 261.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_65_65" id="Footnote_65_65"></a><a href="#FNanchor_65_65"><span class="label">[65]</span></a></span>
<i>Genius of Christianity.</i></p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_66_66" id="Footnote_66_66"></a><a href="#FNanchor_66_66"><span class="label">[66]</span></a></span>
<i>Anatomy of the Vertebrates</i>, vol. iii. p. 260 <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_67_67" id="Footnote_67_67"></a><a href="#FNanchor_67_67"><span class="label">[67]</span></a></span>
<i>Organization of the Animal Kingdom.</i></p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_68_68" id="Footnote_68_68"></a><a href="#FNanchor_68_68"><span class="label">[68]</span></a></span>
<i>Essay on the Physiology of Serpents.</i> Translated from
the original by Thomas Stewart Trail, M.D., F.R.S.E., etc. Edin. 1843.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_69_69" id="Footnote_69_69"></a><a href="#FNanchor_69_69"><span class="label">[69]</span></a></span>
‘On the Movements of Snakes in Flight,’ by Dr. Arthur
Stradling, C.M.Z.S., <i>Nature</i>, Feb. 1882.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_70_70" id="Footnote_70_70"></a><a href="#FNanchor_70_70"><span class="label">[70]</span></a></span>
Letter to Sir Emerson Tennant.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_71_71" id="Footnote_71_71"></a><a href="#FNanchor_71_71"><span class="label">[71]</span></a></span>
Dumeril et Bibron, <i>Erpétologie générale</i>, tome i. p.
179.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_72_72" id="Footnote_72_72"></a><a href="#FNanchor_72_72"><span class="label">[72]</span></a></span>
Since this has been in type, there has been brought to
the Gardens an Indian ‘River snake’ (<i>Tropidonotus quincunciatus</i>),
affording me an opportunity to observe that there is a notable
modification of the glottis, as also of the nostrils. Not a true water
snake, but one of the intermediate families, so do we find the nostrils
somewhat higher than those of land snakes, while yet not quite on the
top of the snout as in sea snakes; the glottis has a corresponding
upward direction to meet them, and is a more elongated, longitudinal
slit than those furnished with the <i>petite languette</i>.&mdash;June 1882.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_73_73" id="Footnote_73_73"></a><a href="#FNanchor_73_73"><span class="label">[73]</span></a></span>
<i>Prairie Farms and Prairie Folk</i>, vol. ii. pp. 83, 84.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_74_74" id="Footnote_74_74"></a><a href="#FNanchor_74_74"><span class="label">[74]</span></a></span>
See <i>Field</i> newspaper, June 25, 1881.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_75_75" id="Footnote_75_75"></a><a href="#FNanchor_75_75"><span class="label">[75]</span></a></span>
<i>Thanatophidia of India</i>, 1st ed.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_76_76" id="Footnote_76_76"></a><a href="#FNanchor_76_76"><span class="label">[76]</span></a></span>
<i>Origin of Species</i>, 6th ed. 1872, p. 83.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_77_77" id="Footnote_77_77"></a><a href="#FNanchor_77_77"><span class="label">[77]</span></a></span>
See <i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, London, 1672.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_78_78" id="Footnote_78_78"></a><a href="#FNanchor_78_78"><span class="label">[78]</span></a></span>
<i>New Experiments upon Vipers, with Exquisite Remedies
that may be drawn from them: as well as Cure for their Bitings, as for
that of other Maladies.</i> By M. Charas, now rendered English, 1673.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_79_79" id="Footnote_79_79"></a><a href="#FNanchor_79_79"><span class="label">[79]</span></a></span>
<i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, vol. xxxviii. p. 321. 1733.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_80_80" id="Footnote_80_80"></a><a href="#FNanchor_80_80"><span class="label">[80]</span></a></span>
<i>History of Virginia</i>, 1722.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_81_81" id="Footnote_81_81"></a><a href="#FNanchor_81_81"><span class="label">[81]</span></a></span>
<i>Last Rambles among the Indians</i>, by Geo. Catlin. London,
1865.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_82_82" id="Footnote_82_82"></a><a href="#FNanchor_82_82"><span class="label">[82]</span></a></span>
See <i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, vol. xxxii. A paper on
the Crotalus, by Paul Dudley, Esq.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_83_83" id="Footnote_83_83"></a><a href="#FNanchor_83_83"><span class="label">[83]</span></a></span>
<i>North American Herpetology</i>, vol. iii. p. 15. By J. E.
Holbrooke. 1842.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_84_84" id="Footnote_84_84"></a><a href="#FNanchor_84_84"><span class="label">[84]</span></a></span>
‘The History of a Rattle,’ by Catherine C. Hopley, <i>Aunt
Judy’s Magazine</i>, July 1877.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_85_85" id="Footnote_85_85"></a><a href="#FNanchor_85_85"><span class="label">[85]</span></a></span>
<i>Erpétologie générale</i>, tome vii. part. ii, p. 1457, par
MM. Dumeril et Bibron. Paris.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_86_86" id="Footnote_86_86"></a><a href="#FNanchor_86_86"><span class="label">[86]</span></a></span>
<i>Organization of the Animal Kingdom</i>, p. 732. By T. Rymer
Jones.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_87_87" id="Footnote_87_87"></a><a href="#FNanchor_87_87"><span class="label">[87]</span></a></span>
From the Bulletin of the U. S. Geological Survey by Dr.
Elliot Coues, Appointed Surgeon and Naturalist to the Expedition, 1878.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_88_88" id="Footnote_88_88"></a><a href="#FNanchor_88_88"><span class="label">[88]</span></a></span>
<i>The Country</i> newspaper, August 1878 <i>et seq.</i></p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_89_89" id="Footnote_89_89"></a><a href="#FNanchor_89_89"><span class="label">[89]</span></a></span>
<i>Erpétologie générale</i>, tome vii. p. 1456.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_90_90" id="Footnote_90_90"></a><a href="#FNanchor_90_90"><span class="label">[90]</span></a></span>
<i>Reptiles of British India</i>, by Dr. Albert Günther,
F.R.S.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_91_91" id="Footnote_91_91"></a><a href="#FNanchor_91_91"><span class="label">[91]</span></a></span>
<i>Reptiles of British India</i>, by Dr. Albert Günther,
F.R.S.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_92_92" id="Footnote_92_92"></a><a href="#FNanchor_92_92"><span class="label">[92]</span></a></span>
<i>Indian Snakes</i>, by Ed. Nicholson, M.D. Madras, 1870.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_93_93" id="Footnote_93_93"></a><a href="#FNanchor_93_93"><span class="label">[93]</span></a></span>
Introduction to the <i>Catalogue of the Snakes in the
British Museum</i>, 1858.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_94_94" id="Footnote_94_94"></a><a href="#FNanchor_94_94"><span class="label">[94]</span></a></span>
<i>Physiognomie des serpents</i>, par H. Schlegel. Amsterdam,
1837.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_95_95" id="Footnote_95_95"></a><a href="#FNanchor_95_95"><span class="label">[95]</span></a></span>
<i>The Albert Nyanza, or Great Basin of the Nile</i>, by Sir
Sam. Baker. London, 1866.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_96_96" id="Footnote_96_96"></a><a href="#FNanchor_96_96"><span class="label">[96]</span></a></span>
<i>Essai sur la physiognomie des serpents</i>, par Herman
Schlegel. Amsterdam, 1837.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_97_97" id="Footnote_97_97"></a><a href="#FNanchor_97_97"><span class="label">[97]</span></a></span>
<i>Smithsonian Contributions.</i> Washington, 1860.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_98_98" id="Footnote_98_98"></a><a href="#FNanchor_98_98"><span class="label">[98]</span></a></span>
<i>Thanatophidia of India</i>, 2d ed. p. 72.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_99_99" id="Footnote_99_99"></a><a href="#FNanchor_99_99"><span class="label">[99]</span></a></span>
<i>Ricerche fisiche sopra il vel no della vipera.</i> Lucca,
1767.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_100_100" id="Footnote_100_100"></a><a href="#FNanchor_100_100"><span class="label">[100]</span></a></span>
<i>The Relations of the World, and the Religions observed
in all Ages and in all Places discouered since the Creation</i>, Book I.
1st ed. p. 842. London, 1614.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_101_101" id="Footnote_101_101"></a><a href="#FNanchor_101_101"><span class="label">[101]</span></a></span>
<i>Ib.</i> 4th ed. p. 1393. 1625.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_102_102" id="Footnote_102_102"></a><a href="#FNanchor_102_102"><span class="label">[102]</span></a></span>
Paper on the ‘Vipera Caudisona,’ by Ed. Tyson, M.D.,
<i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, vol. xiii. p. 25. 1683.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_103_103" id="Footnote_103_103"></a><a href="#FNanchor_103_103"><span class="label">[103]</span></a></span>
<i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, vol. xxxiv. p. 309. 1726.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_104_104" id="Footnote_104_104"></a><a href="#FNanchor_104_104"><span class="label">[104]</span></a></span>
<i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, vol. xxxviii. 1733-34.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_105_105" id="Footnote_105_105"></a><a href="#FNanchor_105_105"><span class="label">[105]</span></a></span>
<i>Osservazione intorno alle Vipere</i>, by Francesco Redi.
Florence, 1664.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_106_106" id="Footnote_106_106"></a><a href="#FNanchor_106_106"><span class="label">[106]</span></a></span>
Ed. of 1876.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_107_107" id="Footnote_107_107"></a><a href="#FNanchor_107_107"><span class="label">[107]</span></a></span>
<i>Erpétologie générale</i>, tome 7, p. 1451.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_108_108" id="Footnote_108_108"></a><a href="#FNanchor_108_108"><span class="label">[108]</span></a></span>
<i>Erpétologie générale</i>, tome 7, p. 1367.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_109_109" id="Footnote_109_109"></a><a href="#FNanchor_109_109"><span class="label">[109]</span></a></span>
<i>Ibid.</i> p. 1503.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_110_110" id="Footnote_110_110"></a><a href="#FNanchor_110_110"><span class="label">[110]</span></a></span>
<i>Travels in Brazil.</i> London, 1824.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_111_111" id="Footnote_111_111"></a><a href="#FNanchor_111_111"><span class="label">[111]</span></a></span>
<i>Historiæ Rervm Natvralivm Braziliæ.</i> Antwerp.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_112_112" id="Footnote_112_112"></a><a href="#FNanchor_112_112"><span class="label">[112]</span></a></span>
Corresponding Member of the Zoological Society.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_113_113" id="Footnote_113_113"></a><a href="#FNanchor_113_113"><span class="label">[113]</span></a></span>
<i>Zoology of South Africa.</i></p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_114_114" id="Footnote_114_114"></a><a href="#FNanchor_114_114"><span class="label">[114]</span></a></span>
<i>Odontography</i>, vol. i. p. 225.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_115_115" id="Footnote_115_115"></a><a href="#FNanchor_115_115"><span class="label">[115]</span></a></span>
<i>Science News</i>, Feb. 15, 1879.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_116_116" id="Footnote_116_116"></a><a href="#FNanchor_116_116"><span class="label">[116]</span></a></span>
<i>Davis Lecture</i>, July 28th, 1881. Since the above was
written, Professor Flower on ‘Armadillos,’ at the opening lecture
of the ‘Davis Series,’ June 8th, 1882, further corroborated the
difficulties presented in these mixed characters, which have caused
zoologists to place the armadillo among the <i>Edentata</i>, ant-eaters,
sloths, etc., notwithstanding it is permanently supplied with teeth.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_117_117" id="Footnote_117_117"></a><a href="#FNanchor_117_117"><span class="label">[117]</span></a></span>
<i>Wanderings in South America</i>, by Charles Waterton.
London, 1825.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_118_118" id="Footnote_118_118"></a><a href="#FNanchor_118_118"><span class="label">[118]</span></a></span>
<i>The Tropical World.</i> London, 1873.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_119_119" id="Footnote_119_119"></a><a href="#FNanchor_119_119"><span class="label">[119]</span></a></span>
<i>The Western World.</i> London, 1874.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_120_120" id="Footnote_120_120"></a><a href="#FNanchor_120_120"><span class="label">[120]</span></a></span>
<i>Travels in Peru.</i> London, 1847.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_121_121" id="Footnote_121_121"></a><a href="#FNanchor_121_121"><span class="label">[121]</span></a></span>
<i>Rambles and Scrambles in Essequibo.</i> London, 1852.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_122_122" id="Footnote_122_122"></a><a href="#FNanchor_122_122"><span class="label">[122]</span></a></span>
<i>History of British Guiana</i>, vol. ii. p. 370. By G.
Dalton, M.D. Lond. 1855.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_123_123" id="Footnote_123_123"></a><a href="#FNanchor_123_123"><span class="label">[123]</span></a></span>
<i>The Naturalist on the Amazons</i>, by H. W. Bates. Lond.
1873.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_124_124" id="Footnote_124_124"></a><a href="#FNanchor_124_124"><span class="label">[124]</span></a></span>
<i>Proceedings of the Zoological Society</i>, Jan. and Nov.
1861.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_125_125" id="Footnote_125_125"></a><a href="#FNanchor_125_125"><span class="label">[125]</span></a></span>
<i>Travels in the Amazon.</i> Lond. 1855.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_126_126" id="Footnote_126_126"></a><a href="#FNanchor_126_126"><span class="label">[126]</span></a></span>
<i>Thanatophidia</i>, p. 8.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_127_127" id="Footnote_127_127"></a><a href="#FNanchor_127_127"><span class="label">[127]</span></a></span>
<i>Land and Water</i>, October 16, 1880.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_128_128" id="Footnote_128_128"></a><a href="#FNanchor_128_128"><span class="label">[128]</span></a></span>
By J. B. von Spix, <i>Publié par Jean Wagler</i>. Monarchu,
1826.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_129_129" id="Footnote_129_129"></a><a href="#FNanchor_129_129"><span class="label">[129]</span></a></span>
Article ‘Reptilia’ in Todd’s <i>Encyclopædia of Anatomy</i>,
vol. iv. pt. i. p. 264.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_130_130" id="Footnote_130_130"></a><a href="#FNanchor_130_130"><span class="label">[130]</span></a></span>
Since this was written, Dr. Stradling informed me that a
very tame ring snake in his Reptilium laid some eggs and coiled herself
upon them zealously for some days. A remarkable proof of her care for
them was seen in her trying to bite when disturbed. He had never before
known <i>Coluber natrix</i> to display this anger. In the <i>Zoologist</i> of
September 1882, the Doctor contributed a long and important account of
this incubation with its attendant features.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_131_131" id="Footnote_131_131"></a><a href="#FNanchor_131_131"><span class="label">[131]</span></a></span>
‘Wrongly named; or, Poor Little Lizzie,’ by Catherine C.
Hopley. June 1880.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_132_132" id="Footnote_132_132"></a><a href="#FNanchor_132_132"><span class="label">[132]</span></a></span>
<i>Memoirs of Captivity among the Indians.</i> London, 1823.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_133_133" id="Footnote_133_133"></a><a href="#FNanchor_133_133"><span class="label">[133]</span></a></span>
<i>Tree and Serpent Worship</i>, 2d ed., by J. Ferguson.
London, 1873.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_134_134" id="Footnote_134_134"></a><a href="#FNanchor_134_134"><span class="label">[134]</span></a></span>
<i>Old Deccan Days.</i> London, 1870.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_135_135" id="Footnote_135_135"></a><a href="#FNanchor_135_135"><span class="label">[135]</span></a></span>
See <i>Land and Water</i>, June 10th, 1876.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_136_136" id="Footnote_136_136"></a><a href="#FNanchor_136_136"><span class="label">[136]</span></a></span>
<i>Times</i>, 1st July 1875, paper by C. C. H. <i>Ibid.</i> 7th
July.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_137_137" id="Footnote_137_137"></a><a href="#FNanchor_137_137"><span class="label">[137]</span></a></span>
Some interesting correspondence on this subject appeared
in the <i>Field</i> during August and September 1881.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_138_138" id="Footnote_138_138"></a><a href="#FNanchor_138_138"><span class="label">[138]</span></a></span>
<i>Anecdotes of Serpents</i>, by the late J. K. Lord. Messrs.
Chambers’s <i>Miscellany of Tracts</i>, Edinburgh, 1870.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_139_139" id="Footnote_139_139"></a><a href="#FNanchor_139_139"><span class="label">[139]</span></a></span>
<i>Land and Water</i>, April 3d, 1880.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_140_140" id="Footnote_140_140"></a><a href="#FNanchor_140_140"><span class="label">[140]</span></a></span>
<i>Zoology of South Africa.</i></p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_141_141" id="Footnote_141_141"></a><a href="#FNanchor_141_141"><span class="label">[141]</span></a></span>
Papers on the Ophidians in the <i>Dublin University
Magazine</i>, January 1876 et seq.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_142_142" id="Footnote_142_142"></a><a href="#FNanchor_142_142"><span class="label">[142]</span></a></span>
<i>Thanatophidia of India.</i></p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_143_143" id="Footnote_143_143"></a><a href="#FNanchor_143_143"><span class="label">[143]</span></a></span>
<i>Land and Water</i>, September 11, 1880.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_144_144" id="Footnote_144_144"></a><a href="#FNanchor_144_144"><span class="label">[144]</span></a></span>
<i>Nature</i>, July 6, 1882: ‘Hydrophobia and Snake-Bite,’ by
Dr. A. Stradling.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_145_145" id="Footnote_145_145"></a><a href="#FNanchor_145_145"><span class="label">[145]</span></a></span>
<i>Medical Times</i>, 1873, vol. ii. p. 90.</p>

<p class="pfn4"><span class="ln1"><a name="Footnote_146_146" id="Footnote_146_146"></a><a href="#FNanchor_146_146"><span class="label">[146]</span></a></span>
<i>Smithsonian Contributions.</i> Washington, D.C., 1860.</p></div>
</div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr class="chap" />
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<div class="transnote p4">
<p class="pc large">TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE:</p>
<p class="ptn">&mdash;Obvious errors were corrected.</p>
</div>
</div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 53153 ***</div>
</body>
</html>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2026-04-05 10:24:07 +0000