summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/51243-h/51243-h.htm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/51243-h/51243-h.htm')
-rw-r--r--old/51243-h/51243-h.htm13447
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 13447 deletions
diff --git a/old/51243-h/51243-h.htm b/old/51243-h/51243-h.htm
deleted file mode 100644
index 711dbc1..0000000
--- a/old/51243-h/51243-h.htm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,13447 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
- "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
-<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
- <head>
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
- <title>
- The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Life of Midhat Pasha, by his son Ali Haydar Midhat Bey.
- </title>
-
-<link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" />
-
- <style type="text/css">
-
-body {
- margin-left: 10%;
- margin-right: 10%;
-}
-
- h1 { font-weight: normal;
- text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
- clear: both;
-}
- h2 { font-weight: normal; font-size: 1.1em;
- text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
- clear: both;
-}
-
- h3 { font-weight: normal; font-size: .8em; margin-top: 1.51em;
- text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
- clear: both;
-}
-p {
- margin-top: .51em;
- text-align: justify;
- margin-bottom: .49em;
-}
-
-p.tb {
- margin-top: 1.51em;
- text-align: justify;
- margin-bottom: .49em;
-}
-p.indent { margin-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;
- margin-top: 0em;
- text-align: justify;
- margin-bottom: 0em;
-}
-
-p.indent2 { margin-left: 1em; text-indent: -1em;
- margin-top: 0em; padding-right: 1em;
- text-align: left;
- margin-bottom: 0em;
-}
-
-p.indent3 { margin-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;
- margin-top: 0.51em;
- text-align: justify;
- margin-bottom: .49em;
-}
-.f12 {font-size: 1.2em;}
-.f08 {font-size: .8em;}
-.f09 {font-size: .9em;}
-.padr1 {padding-right: 1em;}
-.padt1 {padding-right: 1em;}
-.padr2 {padding-right: 2em;}
-.padr5 {padding-right: 5em;}
-.padt1 {padding-top: 1em;}
-.padl4 {padding-left: 4em;}
-.vertb {vertical-align: bottom;}
-.vertt {vertical-align: top;}
-.h {visibility: hidden;}
-.f15 {font-size: 1.5em;}
-
-hr {
- width: 34%;
- margin-top: 2em;
- margin-bottom: 2em;
- margin-left: 33%;
- margin-right: 33%;
- clear: both;
-}
-
-hr.short {
- width: 10%;
- margin-top: 2em;
- margin-bottom: 2em;
- margin-left: 45%;
- margin-right: 45%;
- clear: both;
-}
-
-
-table {
- margin-left: auto;
- margin-right: auto;
-}
-table.content {
- margin-left: auto; font-size: .9em;
- margin-right: auto;
-}
- .tdl {text-align: left;}
- .tdr {text-align: right;}
- .tdc {text-align: center;}
-
-.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
- /* visibility: hidden; */
- position: absolute;
- left: 92%;
- font-size: smaller;
- text-align: right;
-} /* page numbers */
-
-.blockquot { line-height: .97em; font-size: .95em; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em;
-
-}
-
-.center {text-align: center; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 1em; }
-.center2 {text-align: center; margin-top: 0em; margin-bottom: 0em;}
-
-.right {text-align: right;}
-
-.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
-@media handheld {.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}}
-.gesperrt
-{
- letter-spacing: 2em;
- margin-left: 0em; max-width: 100%;
-}
-@media handheld {.gesperrt
-{
- letter-spacing: 2em;
- margin-left: 0em; max-width: 100%;
-}}
-/* Images */
-img {
- max-width: 100%; /* no image to be wider than screen or containing div */
- height:auto; /* keep height in proportion to width */
-}
-
-div.figcenter {
- clear: both;
- margin: 2em auto;
- text-align: center;
- max-width: 100%; /* div no wider than screen, even when screen is narrow */
-}
-
-/* Footnotes */
-
-.footnote {margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 5%; font-size: 0.9em;}
-
-.footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 90%; text-align: right;}
-
-.fnanchor {
- vertical-align: super;
- font-size: .8em;
- text-decoration:
- none;
-}
-
-</style>
- </head>
-<body>
-
-
-<pre>
-
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his
-services, political reforms, banishment, , by Ali Haydar Midhat
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
-other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
-the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
-to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
-
-Title: The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder (1903)
-
-Author: Ali Haydar Midhat
-
-Release Date: February 17, 2016 [EBook #51243]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LIFE OF MIDHAT PASHA ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Turgut Dincer and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images generously made available by The
-Internet Archive)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-</pre>
-
-
-<p class="center">THE LIFE OF MIDHAT PASHA</p>
-
-<hr />
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;">
-<img src="images/i_frontis.jpg" width="400" height="529" alt="" />
-<table summary="photo" border="0" width="100%"><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><small><small><i>From&nbsp;a&nbsp;Photograph.</i></small></small></td>
-<td class="tdr"><small><small><i>The&nbsp;Typographic&nbsp;Etching&nbsp;Co.&nbsp;Ph.&nbsp;Sc.</i></small></small></td>
-</tr></table></div>
-
-<p class="center f12"><i>Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-<hr />
-
-<h1><small>THE LIFE OF</small><br />
-MIDHAT PASHA</h1>
-
-<p class="center f12">A RECORD OF HIS SERVICES,<br />
-POLITICAL REFORMS, BANISHMENT,<br />
-AND JUDICIAL MURDER<br /><br /></p>
-
-<p class="center">DERIVED FROM PRIVATE DOCUMENTS AND<br />
-REMINISCENCES<br />
-BY HIS SON ALI HAYDAR MIDHAT BEY<br /><br />
-WITH PORTRAITS<br />
-<br />
-LONDON<br />
-JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET, W.<br />
-1903</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">vii</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>PREFACE</h2>
-
-<p><span class="smcap">As</span> the Son of Midhat Pasha I was for fifteen years
-compelled to reside as an exile in Smyrna, but finding
-the physical and moral sufferings to which I was there
-subjected greater than I could endure, I succeeded in
-quitting the territories of the Sultan, and came to take
-up my residence in this hospitable land, and among this
-great and free people.</p>
-
-<p>In the following pages I have endeavoured to
-carry out a duty which has long been incumbent on
-me, by letting the public, and especially the English
-public, know the true story of my father’s career, and
-of his death.</p>
-
-<p>The record is based mainly on documents and notes
-left by him. In obedience to requests from high
-quarters I abstain from publishing certain documents
-and correspondence which, bearing as they do on
-International affairs, might be calculated to cause
-embarrassment and do harm.</p>
-
-<p>It is possible that some of my father’s papers
-which I have now printed, and which were written in
-Turkish, may have lost some of their original brightness
-in the process of translation, but at least, most scrupu<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">viii</a></span>lous
-care has been taken to give the sense of them
-accurately.</p>
-
-<p>There can be no doubt that at the present time
-Turkey is suffering from a Reign of Terror, and is in
-a state of anarchy. I hope that the narrative contained
-in these pages may afford some evidence of the
-methods by which this condition of affairs has been
-produced.</p>
-
-<p>My readers will learn how the Sovereign of the
-Ottoman Empire, in order to carry out his own system
-of Government, has suppressed every effort for reform,
-and has removed those men, who by their force of
-character, by their uprightness, and by their popularity,
-seemed capable of thwarting his designs, and amending
-the condition of the country and of the people.</p>
-
-<p>I wish to state here that I have a profound respect
-for the Imperial Throne, and it is this consideration
-alone, I repeat it, and the honour of my country, which
-makes me regard it as a duty to humanity to expose
-the nefarious system of Sultan Abdul Hamid.</p>
-
-<p>In conclusion, I would beg to offer my thanks to
-the Proprietors of the <em>Times</em> newspaper for giving me
-permission to reprint the excellent report of my father’s
-trial which appeared in their columns.</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">ALI HAYDAR MIDHAT.</p>
-
-<p><small><span class="smcap">Eastbourne</span>, <i>August 6, 1903</i>.</small></p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">ix</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CONTENTS</h2>
-
-<hr class="short" />
-
-<table class=" content" summary="CONTENTS" border="0"><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER I</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">EARLY HISTORY OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdr" colspan="2"><small>Page</small></td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Christians in Turkey&mdash;Turkish treatment of Subject Races&mdash;Corruptions
-of the Ottoman System&mdash;Persistent policy of
-Russia&mdash;Panslavic Committees&mdash;The Palace and the
-Porte&mdash;Growth of Autocracy&mdash;The Janissaries&mdash;Revolt
-of Mehemet Ali&mdash;Reforms of Abdul Medjid&mdash;The Czar
-Nicholas&mdash;Origins of the Crimean War&mdash;The Crimean
-War&mdash;Attitude of France&mdash;Attitude of Austria</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_1">1</a>–31</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER II</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">MIDHAT’S EARLY YEARS</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Midhat in the Balkan Provinces&mdash;Governorship of Nish, etc.&mdash;Widdin
-and Silistria&mdash;Midhat’s Success in Danube
-Provinces&mdash;Intrigues of General Ignatieff&mdash;Insurrection
-stirred up&mdash;Organisation of local Militia&mdash;Appointed
-Vali of Bagdad&mdash;Fighting and Reforms&mdash;Finance and
-Engineering Work&mdash;Bussora&mdash;Koweit, the Nedjed&mdash;The
-Conquest of Nedjed&mdash;Defeat of Abdul Kerim&mdash;Aali
-Pasha&mdash;Extravagance of Abdul Aziz&mdash;Midhat as Grand
-Vizier</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_32">32</a>–66</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER III</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">DEPOSITION AND DEATH OF ABDUL AZIZ</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Troubles in Herzegovina&mdash;Riots at Salonica&mdash;Outbreak in
-Bulgaria&mdash;Meeting at Reichstadt&mdash;The Andrassy Memorandum&mdash;The
-Sultan opposes Reform&mdash;Deposition of
-Abdul Aziz&mdash;Preparations for the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">Coup d’État</i>&mdash;Sultan
-Murad&mdash;Death of Abdul Aziz&mdash;Breakdown of Sultan
-Murad&mdash;Damad Mahmoud’s Conspiracy&mdash;Prince Hamid&mdash;Deposition
-of Murad</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_67">67</a>–99</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2"><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_x" id="Page_x">x</a></span>CHAPTER IV</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">ABDUL HAMID SULTAN</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Abdul Hamid II.&mdash;The Imperial Household&mdash;The Speech
-from the Throne&mdash;Nominal Reforms&mdash;Midhat’s Difficulties&mdash;Nominal
-and Real Reforms&mdash;The New Constitution&mdash;Sovereign
-Rights</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_100">100</a>–115</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER V</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">SECOND GRAND VIZIERATE OF MIDHAT PASHA</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Opposition Intrigues&mdash;“Midhat’s Constitution”&mdash;Intrigues
-against Midhat&mdash;Zia Bey&mdash;The Press&mdash;Promulgation of
-the Constitution&mdash;Rescript of Abdul Hamid&mdash;Favourable
-Reception of the Constitution</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_116">116</a>–131</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER VI</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">THE CONFERENCE AND MIDHAT’S EXILE</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Conference at Constantinople&mdash;General Ignatieff’s Conduct&mdash;The
-New Constitution and the Powers&mdash;Galib Pasha
-and the Finances&mdash;Mixed Schools&mdash;Protest of Midhat&mdash;Midhat
-Exiled&mdash;The Sultan’s Precautions&mdash;Prince Gortchakoff
-and General Ignatieff&mdash;Russian Declaration&mdash;Prince
-Gortchakoff’s Circular</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_132">132</a>–154</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER VII</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">MIDHAT PASHA IN EUROPE</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">The Sultan’s Speech&mdash;Russia Declares War&mdash;Midhat in
-Naples&mdash;Midhat’s Efforts for Peace&mdash;Midhat’s Recall by
-the Sultan&mdash;Midhat and Kiamil Bey</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_155">155</a>–171</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2"><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xi" id="Page_xi">xi</a></span>CHAPTER VIII</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">THE RETURN OF MIDHAT PASHA TO TURKEY</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Midhat in Crete&mdash;Appointed Governor of Syria</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_172">172</a>–175</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER IX</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">MIDHAT PASHA, GOVERNOR‐GENERAL OF SYRIA</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">The Sultan Opposes Reforms&mdash;Cause of Midhat’s Resignation&mdash;Condition
-of Syria&mdash;The Druses and the Arabs&mdash;The
-Turbulent Druses&mdash;Troops to be sent&mdash;The
-Druses&mdash;Resignation of Midhat&mdash;The Palace and Judicial
-Reforms&mdash;Midhat and Syria</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_176">176</a>–195</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER X</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">MIDHAT, GOVERNOR‐GENERAL OF SMYRNA</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Abdul Aziz’ Death&mdash;The <cite>Terdjumani Hakikat</cite>&mdash;Attack on
-Midhat&mdash;Attitude of the French Consul&mdash;Midhat’s Arrest</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_196">196</a>–206</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER XI</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">THE TRIAL OF MIDHAT PASHA</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Mustapha the Wrestler&mdash;The Case for the Defence&mdash;Midhat’s
-Defence&mdash;A Parody of Justice&mdash;The Public Prosecutor&mdash;Before
-the Court of Appeal&mdash;Grand Council&mdash;The
-British Parliament&mdash;Questions in Parliament&mdash;Mr
-M’Coan&mdash;Mr Gladstone&mdash;Lord Stratheden and Campbell&mdash;England’s
-Intervention</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_207">207</a>–233</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER XII</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">EXILE OF MIDHAT PASHA</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Midhat in Prison&mdash;Attempt to Poison Midhat&mdash;Arrest of
-Shereef Abdul Mutalib&mdash;Haïroullah Effendi</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_234">234</a>–241</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">CHAPTER XIII</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">DETAILS OF THE ASSASSINATION OF MIDHAT PASHA, ACCORDING
-TO INFORMATION DERIVED FROM HAÏROULLAH EFFENDI</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Return of Bekir&mdash;Midhat and Bekir&mdash;Tampering with Food&mdash;Attempts
-to Poison&mdash;Preparations for the Murder&mdash;The
-Murder</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_242">242</a>–256</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2"><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xii" id="Page_xii">xii</a></span>APPENDIX A</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">THE NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE BERLIN NOTE AND THE
-CONFERENCE OF CONSTANTINOPLE</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Negotiations following the Berlin Note&mdash;The Conference at
-Reichstadt&mdash;Servian Diplomacy and Defeat&mdash;England
-Proposes Terms&mdash;An Ultimatum to the Porte&mdash;Disagreement
-among the Powers</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_257">257</a>–270</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">APPENDIX B</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">THE INSURRECTION OF HERZEGOVINA AND BOSNIA AND THE
-BERLIN NOTE</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Herzegovina and Bosnia&mdash;Lord Derby and Austria&mdash;Intentional
-Bad Faith&mdash;Austrian Diplomacy&mdash;The Berlin
-Note&mdash;Austria and Russia&mdash;Mr Monson’s Despatch</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_271">271</a>–284</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc padt1" colspan="2">APPENDIX C</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc f08" colspan="2">BULGARIAN ATROCITIES</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl"><p class="indent">A Bulgarian Insurrection&mdash;Revolutionary Agents at Work&mdash;Fictions
-and Ingenious Credulity</p></td><td class="tdr vertb"><a href="#Page_285">285</a>–292</td>
-</tr></table>
-
-<hr />
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">1</a></span></p>
-
-<p class="center f15">MIDHAT PASHA</p>
-
-<hr class="short" />
-
-<h2>CHAPTER I<br /><br />
-
-<small>EARLY HISTORY OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE</small></h2>
-
-<p>It would be inconsistent with the general plan of this
-book to give more than a very summary and cursory
-view of the early history of the Ottoman Empire before
-the time of Midhat Pasha; but it will not be inappropriate,
-and may possibly aid in elucidating the
-history of his times, and throw light on his work of
-reform, if the main features of that history be here drawn
-in outline, and some of the phases traced through which
-the Turkish Empire passed during the four centuries
-that elapsed between the taking of Constantinople by
-Mehemet II. and the Crimean War.</p>
-
-<p>It has sometimes been objected to Midhat Pasha and
-the Constitution of 1876, by those who have given a very
-superficial study to the subject, or who have a political
-object in depreciating all reforms in Turkey, that, however
-admirable the Constitution may have been in itself,
-it was prematurely and precipitately introduced, and ill
-adapted to the peculiar conditions of the Ottoman
-people. One of the aims of this book is to show that,
-so far from this being the case, the reforms associated
-with the name of Midhat Pasha were conceived in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">2</a></span>
-very spirit of the early Ottoman Constitution, and were
-expressly suggested by the wants and requirements of
-that country as revealed in the course of its administration
-to a succession of statesmen, who found themselves
-in practice hampered at every turn, and their best efforts
-continually thwarted by the absence of the very checks
-and safeguards which Midhat’s Constitution endeavoured
-to impose. Within half a century of the taking of
-Constantinople (1454) by Mehemet II., Bulgaria, Servia,
-Moldavia, Wallachia and large portions of Hungary and
-Poland were added to the Ottoman dominions. It was
-(as all impartial writers now admit) as much by virtue
-of the simplicity and purity of its creed, and the force
-of propagandism that it in consequence possessed, as by
-the force of arms, that Islam made such astounding
-progress in those days. If extensive provinces and
-important kingdoms yielded with slight resistance before
-the advance of the Ottoman armies, and if large masses
-of the conquered populations adopted the religion of the
-conquerors, it was because their moral conquest was
-effected before their political subjection was attempted.</p>
-
-<p>The reputation, too, for justice and moderation enjoyed
-by the early Ottoman sovereigns was no insignificant factor
-in conciliating the goodwill and blunting the opposition
-of nations, who might under different conditions have
-opposed a more serious resistance to the advance of the
-Ottoman armies. Sixty years before the appearance of
-the Turks before Constantinople, the people of the
-ancient kingdoms of Roumania were called upon to
-choose between the Magyars&mdash;who, in conformity with
-their traditional policy, desired to Magyarise Wallachia&mdash;and
-the Ottoman sovereign, who offered the inhabitants
-the enjoyment of their religious and civil liberty.
-They did not hesitate between the two, and Mircea
-signed, with the Sultan Bayazid, the first capitulation of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">3</a></span>
-Roumania (1393). Twenty‐six years later, in 1419, the
-Servian ruler Brankovich, pressed by John Hunyadi, ruler
-of Hungary, to join him in an alliance against the Turks,
-invited him to state the policy in respect to religion
-that he proposed to adopt, in the event of victory
-attending their joint military efforts. Hunyadi answered
-without periphrasis, that the Servians would have to
-adopt the Catholic worship. Brankovich then addressed
-a similar question to Mehemet I. “I propose,” replied
-the latter, “to build a church next to every mosque,
-and proclaim that every one shall be at liberty to follow
-his own worship and religion.” Brankovich rejected the
-Hungarian alliance, and declared himself the vassal of
-the Turkish Sultan.</p>
-
-<p>But, it has been contended, the condition of the
-Christian populations (<em>Raias</em>) of the countries actually
-conquered by Islam was very different; and there is
-even a widespread popular belief that these populations
-were forced to “opt” (to use a modern phrase) between the
-religion of the conquerors and death, the poll‐tax (<em>kharadj</em>)
-being the money composition imposed in commutation
-of the death sentence. Nothing can be more erroneous.
-The <em>kharadj</em> was the tax imposed on the Christian
-population in lieu of the military service and other similar
-duties from which they were exempted, disabilities
-generally regarded by them as privileges, and in consequence
-of which they have increased and multiplied and
-become rich and prosperous in the land. An entirely
-false interpretation has been given to a passage in the
-Koran, which was even quoted by the Austrian plenipotentiaries
-at the Conference of Niemirow, in 1737, in
-support of the “Death or Koran” theory here referred
-to. The true answer, which indeed is obvious from the
-context, was given by the Ottoman negotiators on this
-occasion, viz., that the text quoted applied only to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">4</a></span>
-idolaters and not to the “people of the Book.” Anyone
-who knows anything of the religion of Mahomet is aware
-of the important distinction recognised therein between
-the “people of the Book” (<em>kitabi</em>) and idolaters (<em>medjous</em>),
-and knows that whereas little mercy, it is true, was shown
-to the latter, the former were included in the Dar‐ul‐Islam
-(the house of Islam), where they formed an integral portion
-of the empire, and that the true Mahomedan was taught,
-with respect to the latter, that “their substance is as our
-substance, their eyes as our eyes, and their souls as our
-souls.” The fable, too, that the murder of a Christian by
-a Mahomedan was considered by the Cheri (sacred law)
-as a trivial offence, and was visited by a lighter punishment
-than the same crime committed on the person of
-a Mussulman, is disposed of by the <em>Fetva</em> delivered by the
-Mufti (Supreme Judge of the Sacred Law), and quoted
-by Cantimer<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">1</a> in answer to the question, “What should be
-the penalty if eleven Mussulmans murdered one Christian?”
-“If the Mussulmans were one thousand and one in number,
-instead of only eleven, they should all be put to death.”</p>
-
-<p>So far indeed is it from being historically true that
-the conquered Christian populations were forced by the
-sword to adopt the religion of Mahomet, that when
-Selim I. desired, for reasons of what he considered long‐sighted
-policy, so to convert the Christians of the Balkans,
-he was stopped short in the attempt by a <em>Fetva</em> of the
-Sheik‐ul‐Islam, Zenbilli Ali Effendi, who pronounced
-such a proceeding to be contrary to the Koran and
-the Cheri (sacred law), and the attempt was accordingly
-abandoned.</p>
-
-<p>It may be remarked, in passing, that history does not
-relate that Cromwell was ever diverted from a policy
-similar to that from which Selim was deflected, or
-hampered in his enactment of the penal laws in Ireland
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">5</a></span>by any such scruples or protests on the part of the
-ecclesiastical authorities of his day. However that may
-be, the policy of the Ottoman sovereigns with reference
-to the conquered Raias was the exact opposite to that
-popularly supposed. Nor was the policy actually adopted
-the result of any idiosyncracy or peculiar generosity on
-their part. It was in strict obedience to the injunctions
-of the Prophet, and in conformity with the policy pursued
-by himself in the “letters patent,” accorded to the
-Christians (<em>nassara</em>) on the 4th day of Moharem of the
-year 11 of the Hegira. It was in fact the fixed and settled
-policy of the Mussulman political system.</p>
-
-<p>In proof of this position some European authorities,
-by no means particularly inclined to the Ottoman cause,
-Montesquieu for example, may be quoted. This author
-bears testimony to the happy change effected in the
-condition of the Greek population of the empire after
-the occupation of their capital by the Turks: “The
-people,” he says, “in place of that continued series of
-vexations which the subtle avarice of the Byzantine
-Emperors had devised, were now subjected to a simple
-tribute, easily paid and lightly borne, happy in having
-to submit to even a barbarous nation (<i>sic</i>) rather than
-to a corrupt government under which they suffered all
-the inconveniences of a fictitious liberty with all the
-horrors of a real servitude.”</p>
-
-<p>The reports of the Venetian ambassadors, and the
-narratives of travellers in the sixteenth century, like
-La Motraye, offer concurrent testimony to the tolerance
-and moderation of this “barbarous nation.” “The other
-(<i>i.e.</i> the Christian) subjects of the Empire,” says La
-Motraye, “enjoy all the liberty of conscience that they
-can desire. They go to the churches and pilgrimages
-and practise all the rights of their religion, without fear
-or molestation. The same thing applies to their commerce<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">6</a></span>
-and temporal affairs. They have no dread of being
-deprived of the fruits of their labours, which they enjoy
-without let or hindrance.”<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">2</a></p>
-
-<p>Compare with this condition of the Greek Raias of
-the Ottoman Empire that, for instance, of the Greek
-population of Chio under Genoese domination, as
-described by Genoese writers themselves, and quoted
-by Mr Fustel de Coulanges, where the unfortunate
-population, in addition to daily exactions and injustices,
-were compelled four times a year, at Christmas, Easter,
-Whitsunday, and the Feast of the Circumcision, to attend
-a ceremony, best described as “a feast of humiliation,”
-at which their clergy and chief citizens were summoned
-to the palace of the Podesta, where a herald, mounted on
-a stand, with a wand in his hand, read four prayers for
-the Pope, the Emperor, the Republic of Genoa, and the
-family of the Justiniani, and obliged the assembled
-Chiotes, at the end of each prayer, to answer in responsive
-and quasi‐enthusiastic acclamations; these poor
-Chiotes being thus compelled to acclaim and pray for
-the Pope&mdash;their greatest enemy&mdash;the Emperor they knew
-nothing about, the Republic that had subjected them,
-and the family of the Justiniani whom they detested,
-representing as it did the “Maona” (a financial company)
-that ruthlessly pillaged them.</p>
-
-<p>Take again the case of the Candiotes under the
-domination of the Venetians, in which the Greek population
-of the island did not hesitate to conspire with
-the Turkish besiegers in order to deliver their capital
-into their hands, and thus free themselves from the
-oppression of the Italian Republic.<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor">3</a></p>
-
-<p>Even the Greeks of the Morea complained bitterly
-of the religious persecution of the Venetians, whereas,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">7</a></span>said they, “the Turks allowed us all the liberty we
-required.”<a name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_4" class="fnanchor">4</a></p>
-
-<p>These quotations, which could be multiplied <em>ad
-infinitum</em>, will probably suffice. It was indeed the
-universal cry of all the Christian population in the
-East, from the middle of the fifteenth century to the
-beginning of the eighteenth&mdash;“A thousand times rather
-the Turks than the Latins.”</p>
-
-<p>That corruptions gradually grew up in the land of
-the Osmanli; that perversions of the law crept into its
-practice, and that prejudices, engendered by ignorance,
-created abuses which in earlier days were sternly
-repressed, it is not intended here to deny. Indeed it
-is the contention of this book that such perversions,
-the causes of which it will be its purpose to trace, did
-spring up, as rank weeds, in the Ottoman system; but
-what is strenuously asserted, and what will, it is hoped,
-be proved, is that they formed no part or parcel of the
-original Ottoman Constitution, but were, on the contrary,
-excrescences in that system, violations of its spirit and
-essence; and further, that the efforts of the reforming
-party in the nation, from the days of Selim III. to the
-accession of Abdul Hamid II., through an apostolic
-succession of patriots and statesmen&mdash;including the
-Keuprulu Mehemets, the Reshids, the Aalis, the Fuads
-and the Midhats&mdash;were directed to the end of restoring
-the spirit of that Constitution, with such adaptation of
-it to the requirements of the day as the experience,
-science and political conditions of the world required.</p>
-
-<p>Mehemet II., from the moment he sheathed his sword
-on victory being assured, manifested his determination
-that the lives and properties of the conquered populations
-should be respected, and, in order to give weight
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">8</a></span>to his orders to that effect, took immediate measures
-to offer a conspicuous example of respect for the
-religion of his new subjects by his conduct as its
-hierarchical chief. He summoned the Greek Patriarch
-(<em>Roum milleti patriki</em>) to a solemn Divan, stepped down
-from his throne, and breaking through all established usage,
-advanced ten steps to meet him, took him by the hand,
-and seated him next to himself in the place of honour,
-delivering into his hands, as a symbol of power, a golden
-sceptre, which to this day is carried in processions on
-occasions of great ceremonies, investing him with
-unlimited authority over all Orthodox schools, monasteries
-and churches, and with judicial and administrative
-functions over all his co‐religionists.</p>
-
-<p>Such a delegation of power was the nearest approach
-to the establishment of an <em>imperium in imperio</em> as is
-afforded in history, with, let it be added, all the weakness
-that attaches to such a <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">régime</i>, as was subsequently too
-clearly proved by the pernicious use made of these
-privileges by a foreign Power, in founding on them a
-claim to interfere in the internal affairs of the empire,
-and in using them as a lever to overthrow it.</p>
-
-<p>But wise or unwise, such at any rate was the policy
-adopted by the Sultans of Turkey towards their Christian
-subjects, and the legend of conversion by the sword must
-be relegated, with so many similar fables with respect to
-Turkey, to the mythology of history.</p>
-
-<p>From the foundation of the empire, and under the
-ægis of its government, the Hellenisation of the Raias,
-under the authority of the Patriarch of the Phanar, proceeded
-apace throughout the country. So effectually
-indeed was this taking place, that the very name of Slav, or
-Bulgarian, implying as it did an inferior social status, was
-gradually falling into disuse, and the prouder appellation
-of “Roum,” or Greek, substituted for it.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">9</a></span></p>
-
-<p>It is probable that another half‐century of this process
-would have blotted out the very name of Slav, had not
-a new Power appeared on the world’s stage, introducing
-a new factor in the Eastern problem, and profoundly
-modifying its conditions. This was the rise of Russia as
-a world Power, under the rule of that extraordinary man
-of genius, Peter I. After finally breaking the power of
-Sweden at the great battle of Pultava, and after adding
-Livonia, Esthonia, Ingria, Finland, and Lithuania to his
-already vast dominions, and founding a capital with a
-maritime outlet on the Northern Seas, he turned his
-ambition to the sunny lands of the South, which the legend
-of the marriage of a Byzantine princess with a Russian
-<em>Kneze</em> had already annexed in imagination to the Empire
-of Moscovy.</p>
-
-<p>This is the place to refer to an historical event which
-has more than a passing interest, as it may be said to be
-the source and origin of the undeviating policy of Russia
-in her dealings with Turkey. At the historical interview
-between Peter the Great and Cantimir, Voivode of
-Moldavia, the latter initiated the Russian Czar into the
-secret of the Eastern problem, and explained to him the
-profit that might be derived from taking adroit advantage
-of the privileges of self‐government enjoyed by the
-Christians in the East, and from the steady pursuit of a
-policy exploiting this autonomy to the best advantage.</p>
-
-<p>The lesson here learnt was never forgotten, and the
-political strategy here determined on became henceforth
-the very keystone of Russia’s policy in regard to Turkey.</p>
-
-<p>Whether the famous will of Peter the Great be
-apocryphal or not, as historically speaking it probably is,
-there is no doubt that it expresses, with prophetic instinct
-at any rate, the great lines of policy that have ever since
-been pursued with reference to Turkey by all Peter’s
-successors.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">10</a></span></p>
-
-<p>Two distinct phases have marked the manner of
-Russia’s dealings with the Christians of the East,
-although those dealings have been undeviating in their
-aims and in general plan of attack on the Ottoman
-Empire.</p>
-
-<p>The first phase was marked by a close alliance with
-a Greek Patriarch and his Metropolitans, and a general
-identification of views between the Russian and Greek
-propaganda.</p>
-
-<p>The Greek liturgy and the Greek priesthood were
-accepted without a question, whilst portraits of the Czar,
-with the superscription “Emperor of the Greco‐Russians,”
-were freely circulated by the Greek clergy among their
-flocks. Colonel Repnin’s plot, in 1837, took place in
-connivance with the Greek Patriarch, and a few years later
-Marshal Munich was received by the peasants of Moldavia
-with the Greek archbishop and his clergy marching at their
-head. The convents and monasteries in Moldavia,
-Wallachia, Servia, and Montenegro were used as <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">dépôts</i>
-for arms, and monks were not the least audacious of the
-leaders of the revolutionists. Piccolo Stefano in Servia
-and Montenegro, Papazoglou in Greece, and Gamana in
-Wallachia, put themselves at the head of armed bands, that
-were joined by others from across the frontier. This
-alliance continued until Russia, having by her victories and
-prestige acquired the position of the recognised leader of
-the anti‐Turkish movement, was strong enough to dispense
-with the Greek alliance and to champion the cause of pure
-Slavism undiluted with Hellenism.</p>
-
-<p>The second phase of Russian policy in the Slav
-provinces was marked by the feverish activity of the
-Panslavic Committees of Bucharest, Kischnoff, Moscow
-and Kieff, the cynical intrigues of the Russian ambassadors
-at Constantinople, and the fanatical articles of
-Katkoff in the <cite>Moscow Gazette</cite>, the aim of all which was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">11</a></span>
-to give a national direction to the Slavic movement in the
-Turkish provinces. The nationalisation of the religion of
-the people, the substitution of the authority of national
-Exarchs as heads of their churches, in the place of the
-Greek Patriarch, and of a native clergy educated in Russia
-in the place of that nominated at the Phanar, were the
-measures called for, and successively adopted, to stimulate
-a movement that now embraced all Slav dependencies of
-Turkey in its action. The pretext of protecting and
-securing the privileges of the Christian communities in the
-Turkish Empire was finally dropped, and the liberation of
-the oppressed nationalities of the South‐West of Europe
-became the watchword of the new propaganda.</p>
-
-<p>All the machinery of the heavily subsidised Panslavic
-Committee was set in motion; band after band
-was raised and sent across the frontier; rebellion was
-openly preached, and the ignorant peasantry were deluded,
-by arguments which they did not understand, to complain
-of grievances which they did not feel.</p>
-
-<p>The answer to the question of how such an encroaching
-and cynically pursued policy, violating as it did every
-principle of international law and comity in its dealings
-with a neighbouring nation, was possible&mdash;in a century, too,
-that was roused to indignation against a not dissimilar but
-entirely unofficial raid in South Africa&mdash;must be sought in
-the unfortunate condition and weakness of the Ottoman
-Empire that exposed it, almost defenceless, to the attacks
-of its powerful neighbour, and dispensed the latter from
-even the decencies of international intercourse as practised
-among civilised nations.</p>
-
-<p>This weakness in its turn was the result, as this work
-is specially intended to show, of corruptions and perversions
-that had crept into an originally admirable
-Constitution, and had produced a paralysis of all its
-important functions, placing its nation almost as much<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">12</a></span>
-at the mercy of its enemies as had the <em>Liberum Veto</em> the
-fair land of Poland.</p>
-
-<p>The successive steps of these innovations must now
-be rapidly traced. When the conquering energies of the
-new empire were exhausted, and its victorious armies
-checked under the walls of Vienna by Sobieski and his
-Poles, and the maritime power of its fleet broken by Don
-John of Austria’s victory at Lepanto, a new phase was
-entered upon in which internal re‐organisation took the
-place of external conquest.</p>
-
-<p>The latter half of the sixteenth century was devoted
-to attempts to organise the empire on quasi‐feudal
-principles. It was divided into <em>timars</em> and <em>zeamets</em>
-(fiefs), represented by the great feudatories, the Derebeys.
-This was the first serious innovation, involving a perversion
-of the cardinal principle of the Ottoman Constitution,
-which was in spirit and essence purely democratic; and
-when the counter‐revolution took place, and the Sultans
-determined to get rid of the Derebeys, so as to establish
-their own exclusive power, the mischief was already done,
-for the old principle of democracy, as understood by the
-companions of Othman, was by this time seriously impaired
-by the long disuse of its ancient rights and
-functions; so that this counter‐revolution, instead of
-restoring the old order of things, only redounded to
-the exclusive profit of autocracy. Nothing but the
-Porte (that is the Government), and the traditional
-authority it exercised, now stood in the way of the
-complete absolutism of the Sultan, and, owing to the
-veneration of the Ottoman people for their sovereigns&mdash;a
-veneration founded partly on religious, partly on secular,
-sentiments, and due in no small measure to the exceptional
-merits of their early rulers&mdash;the Sultans entered on the
-struggle for absolutism equipped with superior advantages.
-Having no fear of popular encroachments before their eyes,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">13</a></span>
-or of popular passion directed against their persons, they
-could devote their entire thoughts and energies to the task
-of dominating the Porte and monopolising power in the
-State.</p>
-
-<p>The struggle of these two contending forces, the
-Palace and the Porte, continued for a long time,
-with alternate preponderance on either side, a strong
-Sultan and a weak vizier inclining the scales towards
-autocracy, whilst a strong vizier with a weak or
-luxurious Sultan, redressed the balance to the other side.
-The Keuprulu Mehemets, Reshids, Aalis and Fuads
-left the impress of their minds on the Ottoman policy
-and administration, whilst a host of so‐called Grand
-Viziers&mdash;whom it would be superfluous to name singly,
-inasmuch as their collective name is legion&mdash;were the
-mere registers of the will, and instruments of the caprices,
-of their masters. The Sultan Abdul Medjid counted with
-Reshid Pasha, and Abdul Aziz with Aali and Fuad, as
-long as they were alive; but it was reserved for his
-successor, after he had suppressed a Constitution that he
-had sworn to observe as the very condition of his mounting
-to the throne, to brush all checks and counterpoises
-of every kind aside, and to set up a pure, unmixed
-despotism, based on caprice and corruption alone. Such a
-system of government had been hitherto unknown to
-the Ottoman Constitution, was emphatically denounced
-by the prophets, was contrary to the express provisions
-of the Sacred Law, was repudiated by Mehemet II.
-and all the early Sultans as well as Caliphs of Islam,
-and ran counter to all the traditions of the Ottoman
-people.</p>
-
-<p>Simultaneously with the beginning of this fatal perversion
-and this gradual absorption by the Sultans of all power
-in the State, another change was taking place, closely
-connected with it, and aggravating all its worst effects.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">14</a></span></p>
-
-<p>The high character of the early Sultans of Turkey&mdash;to
-which all contemporary authorities, Christian and
-Mahomedan alike, bear testimony&mdash;had, as has been said,
-profoundly affected the Ottoman character. Their fervid
-loyalty to their rulers sprang in no small measure from
-the lessons inculcated by their early history and their
-most cherished traditions. Now, up to the reign of
-Selim II., the Sultan of Turkey received a very superior
-education. They were not merely patrons of learning,
-but often themselves men of letters of no mean order.
-Mehemet II., the conqueror of Constantinople, was a
-distinguished poet; Selim I., a poet and a litterateur,
-prided himself, above all his prerogatives, on being the
-patron of men of letters and of science. This pursuit
-of science and learning was, moreover, in strict conformity
-with the spirit and letter of the Koran. “Seek science,
-even if it be in China”; “The wise and learned are
-the heirs of the Prophet,” are not isolated texts in a
-book teeming with passages of a similar kind. The
-early Caliphs, too, of Bagdad and Cordova, the Abdur
-Rahmans, Solimans, and Haroun el Reshid, were living
-proofs and typical examples of enlightened Mahomedan
-teaching.</p>
-
-<p>But from the middle of the seventeenth century a
-change came over the spirit of the Sultanate in Turkey.
-Instead of identifying themselves with the life of their
-people and priding themselves on being the light that
-guided them, the Sultans now retired into the harems
-and gave themselves up to a life of ease and indulgence
-utterly foreign to the habits and principles of their
-great predecessors. They surrendered the reins of
-government into the hands of their Kizlar‐Agassi (chiefs
-of eunuchs), or Bostandji Bashi, and as one favourite
-succeeded another, or one palace clique displaced another,
-so vizier followed vizier in rapid and bewildering succes<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">15</a></span>sion.
-All the corrupt and turbulent elements in the State
-were now unchained, justice was sacrificed to private
-interests, the muscles of the State were relaxed, and its
-most vital interests neglected and ignored. To such a
-pass had things come in this “State of Denmark,” that
-when at last a reforming Sultan arose in the person of
-Selim III., he had to pay with his life his reforming ardour,
-and leave to his successor, Mahmoud II., a task almost
-beyond human strength to accomplish. The reigns of the
-next three Sultans after Selim are the history of honest,
-though intermittent, struggles against the fatal legacies of
-the past two centuries, and of many abortive attempts
-to grapple with the evils that a departure from the
-primitive Constitution of the Empire had entailed on it,
-aggravated as these evils were by revolutions organised
-across its borders, and the systematic intrigues and almost
-uninterrupted hostility of its nearest neighbours.</p>
-
-<p>But in following the evolution of the struggle between
-autocracy and the Ottoman people, and endeavouring
-to trace its origin, we have been anticipating the
-chronological order of events. We must now return to
-the narrative of the military movement of the eighteenth
-century, from the time that Peter the Great turned the
-energies of his diplomacy and his armies in the direction
-of the Ottoman provinces.</p>
-
-<p>The first collision between the armed forces of Turkey
-and Russia ended unfavourably for the latter. By the
-treaty of Falksen (1711), Russia was compelled to restore
-Azov, that she had seized, and to undertake to abstain from
-meddling in the affairs of Poland. But for the treachery
-of Baltadji Mehemet Pasha, it is probable that this first
-campaign would have ended still more disastrously
-for Russian arms, and possibly the final partition of
-Poland would have been averted. That unhappy country
-found, at this crisis of her history, in the Sultan of Turkey<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">16</a></span>
-her sole champion and defender among the sovereigns
-of Europe, and her name figured for the last time in
-history in a public instrument in which her rights were
-safeguarded by a Mahomedan sovereign against the
-deadly machinations of her Christian neighbour.</p>
-
-<p>It was certainly unfortunate for the Ottoman Empire&mdash;and
-it may possibly not have been altogether fortunate
-for the rest of Europe&mdash;that the rise of the power of
-Russia should have been synchronous with the period
-of the greatest weakness of Turkey. Russia’s principal
-attacks on the integrity and independence of Turkey
-were skilfully timed so as to coincide with the moment
-when that empire was in the throes of internal revolution,
-and could offer the least resistance to an external
-foe. At the time of Mahmoud II.’s accession to the
-throne, after the murder of Selim III., the accumulation
-of difficulties and dangers that beset the empire were
-such that it seemed as if nothing short of a miracle
-could prevent its complete destruction. It required at
-any rate some very potent principles of internal strength
-and cohesion to resist the centrifugal forces in full
-activity at that crisis. Servia was in open revolt under
-Michel Obrenowitz, Egypt was in the hands of the
-able and ambitious Mehemet Ali, Arabia was in the
-effervescence of a Wahabee rising, the Pasha of Janina
-had raised the standard of revolt, and the Governor of
-Widdin, the famous Pasvan Oglou, had proclaimed his
-independence, and&mdash;most serious danger of all&mdash;the insurrection
-of Greece, supported by a consensus of
-enthusiasm in Europe, threatened the integrity of the
-empire; all this, too, at the very moment when the
-military forces of the empire were undergoing the
-complete reorganisation which Selim had begun, and
-Mahmoud was resolved to carry out. This revolution,
-for it was nothing less, consisted in the abolition of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">17</a></span>
-the ancient corps of Janissaries and the substitution for
-it of a regular force (the <em>Nizam</em>) drilled and organised
-on the European model.</p>
-
-<p>The Janissaries from being a redoubtable <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">corps d’élite</i>
-recruited from Christian youths, who embraced the
-military as a life‐long profession, and were imbued with
-a military spirit which proved its worth on the hard‐fought
-fields of Mohacs, Nicopolis and Cossovo, had
-become through successive relaxings of the bonds of
-discipline and the ruin of its military <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">esprit de corps</i>,
-nothing but an unruly Pretorian Guard, a greater terror
-to the sovereign and to peaceful citizens than to
-the enemies of the empire. The gratuities that they
-were accustomed to receive on the accession of a new
-Sultan, and the licensed pillagings that invariably ensued
-on these occasions, were irresistible temptations to them
-to render this event as frequent as possible, and they
-consequently deposed sovereigns and proclaimed new
-ones almost at their will. The privileges, moreover, that
-they wrested from the terrified sovereigns, especially
-after the death of Soliman I.&mdash;such as the right to
-marry, to desert barrack life (their <em>odjaks</em>), and to
-pursue trades and industries&mdash;completely changed and
-deteriorated their martial character, and from the
-victorious soldiery that they were in the days of Ilderim
-Bayazid they became nothing but a turbulent militia.
-At last the scandal caused by their depredations and
-violence became intolerable, and their disbandment was
-loudly demanded by public opinion in all classes of the
-population. Selim III. determined to suppress them, and,
-as a necessary preliminary, commenced the re‐organisation
-of the naval and military forces of the empire by
-inviting French engineers to build ships of war, and
-French officers to drill and discipline a new army on
-European principles. Unfortunately Bonaparte’s expedi<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">18</a></span>tion
-to Egypt, and the declaration of war that ensued
-between France and Turkey, recalled these military
-instructors before the work of instruction and re‐organisation
-was half completed. It was these threatened
-Janissaries who, on their return to Constantinople from
-an expedition to Syria, willingly lent themselves as
-instruments of the ambition of the Sultan’s brother,
-Mustafa, and who deposed and finally murdered Selim.
-But the deposed sovereign, in his retirement and before
-his death, found time and opportunity thoroughly to
-imbue with his reforming enthusiasm his cousin Mahmoud,
-and he, on ascending the throne, determined, as the
-only means of saving the empire from ruin, and in
-spite of the menacing attitude of the new Czar Nicholas
-of Russia&mdash;who inaugurated his accession by sending an
-Ultimatum to Constantinople&mdash;to carry out unflinchingly
-the whole programme of reforms conceived by Selim.
-At a Grand Council (<em>Divan</em>) assembled in 1826, a
-unanimous vote was passed in favour of the total
-suppression of the Janissaries, and shortly afterwards,
-the decree being resisted by the mutinous soldiery, they
-were surrounded and overpowered, and in the massacre
-that ensued this famous Pretorian Guard finally disappeared.</p>
-
-<p>The organisation, however, of the regular forces
-(<em>Nizam</em>), which were to take their place, being only
-half complete, it was just at the moment when the
-military organisation of the empire was undergoing a
-radical transformation that the new Sultan was called
-upon to face all the complications of internal revolution
-and foreign wars that confronted him on his accession.
-Mahmoud, however, set resolutely about the task, and a
-certain measure of success attended his first efforts. The
-Pashas of Widdin and Janina were successively reduced
-to subjection, and by the help of the Pasha of Egypt<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">19</a></span>
-who had not yet thrown off his allegiance, the Morea
-was reconquered by the troops of Ibrahim Pasha, and
-Greece would undoubtedly have been restored to her
-position as the Western horn of the Ottoman Crescent
-but for the forcible interference of Europe and the
-military expedition of Marshal Maison.</p>
-
-<p>By a protocol, signed at St Petersburg, on 4th April
-1826, Greece was declared an autonomous and vassal
-State; but after the rejection by the Sultan of the
-collective mediation of the four Great Powers (5th
-February 1827), Austria, France, Great Britain and Russia
-(Protocol of London), and the destruction by the allied
-forces, without the formality of a declaration of war, of
-the Turkish fleet at Navarino (1827), immediately followed
-by a declaration of war on the part of Russia, and the
-campaigns of Diebitch in Europe, and Paskiewitz in
-Asia Minor, terminating in the disastrous Treaty of
-Adrianople (14th September 1829), Mahmoud had no
-choice but to consent in the following year (1830) to the
-creation of Greece into an independent kingdom, an
-arrangement confirmed by the Treaty of London on
-the 13th July 1841.</p>
-
-<p>The still more serious revolt of Mehemet Ali&mdash;imperilling
-as it did not only the integrity of the empire, but
-the solidarity of Islam&mdash;immediately followed. On the
-Ottoman sovereign refusing to concede the government
-of Syria to Mehemet Ali, in return for his services in the
-campaign against Greece, the latter, picking a quarrel
-with the governor of the coveted province, quickly invaded
-Syria, and, defeating the Ottoman troops in a great battle
-at Konia, compelled the Sultan to agree to a truce
-(credited with the name of peace), whilst both sides
-prepared for an early resumption of hostilities. When
-this took place the Egyptian troops were again successful
-in a decisive battle at Nezib (24th June 1839), which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">20</a></span>
-placed the whole of Syria, up to the walls of Acre, in
-the possession of the victorious Pasha of Egypt.</p>
-
-<p>Russia was, of course, too alert in following the
-traditional policy in regard to Turkey not to profit
-by these distractions, and it was at this mortal crisis
-of the Ottoman Empire that she stepped in and secured
-the secret clauses of the Treaty of Unkiar Iskelessi (8th
-July 1833), by which she bound Turkey to an offensive
-and defensive alliance that was to last for eight years,
-and to exclude all flags but her own from passing through
-the Bosphorus.</p>
-
-<p>These events, however, at last brought England and
-Austria into the field, and an English fleet under Napier
-appeared before Alexandria, and an English force under
-Sydney Smith before Acre (Saint Jean d’Acre). Mehemet
-Ali, who was now deserted by France, was thus obliged
-to sign the Convention of Alexandria, by which Egypt
-was restored to the suzerainty of the Sultan, with,
-however, the viceroyalty of the country made hereditary
-in his family. By the Treaty of London (13th July 1841),
-this arrangement became part of the public law of Europe,
-and at the same time the clauses of the Treaty of Unkiar
-Iskelessi were revised, and the neutrality of the Straits
-was solemnly reaffirmed.</p>
-
-<p>Six days after the disastrous battle of Nezib (June 25,
-1839), the Sultan Mahmoud died, and was succeeded by
-his son, Abdul Medjid. The youthful sovereign, who was
-only seventeen years old, in spite of the misfortunes that
-had befallen his country, or, perhaps, rather on account
-of them, resolved to persevere steadily in the course of
-reform initiated by his two predecessors. Fortunately he
-possessed in Reshid Pasha a great Minister, who shared
-and seconded, and perhaps prompted, the reforming ardour
-of his master; and on the 3rd November 1839 an
-Imperial Rescript, the famous Hatti Humayoun of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">21</a></span>
-Gulhané, proclaimed the following reforms for the whole
-empire:&mdash;</p>
-
-<table summary="reforms" border="0"><tr>
-<td class="tdr vertt">I.</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent">A guarantee of life and honour to all Ottoman
-subjects, without distinction.</p></td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdr vertt">II.</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent">A regulation of taxation so as to put an end to
-arbitrary exactions.</p></td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdr vertt">III.</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent">The equality of all before the law.</p></td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdr vertt">IV.</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Public instruction to be secularised.</p></td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdr vertt">V.</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent">The slave trade to be abolished.</p></td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdr vertt">VI.</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent">The decentralisation of the provincial governments,
-and a separation of civil, military, and
-fiscal functions.</p></td>
-</tr></table>
-
-<p>This great charter was certainly not intended by its
-author to be a dead letter. It was, on the contrary, an
-earnest attempt to grapple with the new conditions of
-the empire, and to restore the spirit of its ancient Constitution,
-whilst reconciling it to the new requirements of
-the day.</p>
-
-<p>This double purpose was clearly manifested in every
-line of the new decree, the preamble of which ran as
-follows:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“Every one knows that when the Empire was first
-founded, its laws and precepts, which were of a high
-standard, were scrupulously obeyed. Therefore the Empire
-grew in strength and grandeur, and all its subjects, without
-distinction, attained to a high degree of ease and prosperity.
-For the last five hundred years a succession of
-accidents and divers causes have brought it about that
-men have ceased to conform to the sacred code of laws
-and regulations that flow from it, and therefore the force
-and prosperity of former days have been converted into
-weakness and poverty&mdash;for a nation always loses all
-stability when it ceases to observe its laws. These considerations
-have been ceaselessly present to our mind,
-and since the day of our accession to the throne the
-thoughts of the common weal, the amelioration of the
-condition of the provinces, and the lessening of the
-burdens of the people, have been the subjects of our
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">22</a></span>constant preoccupation. Moreover, if the geographical
-position of the Empire; the fertility of its soil; the
-aptitude and intelligence of its inhabitants; be considered,
-they will lead to the conviction that if a ruler
-applies himself diligently to discover the efficacious means
-to effect necessary reforms, the results that we hope to
-attain, with the help of the Almighty, may be achieved
-in the course of a few short years. Therefore, full of
-trust in the help of the Almighty, and leaning on the
-intercession of our Prophet, we consider it right and
-proper to set about, by the help of new institutions,
-procuring for the provinces of our Empire the blessings
-of a sound administration.”</p></div>
-
-<p>Reshid Pasha, by order of the Sultan, set himself
-earnestly to the task of translating the general principles
-enunciated in the Hatti Humayoun, with special laws
-and regulations that should reduce them to practice,
-and four years after its promulgation at Gulhané, the
-<em>Tanzimat</em>, or regulations for the organisation of all the
-branches of administration, was published throughout
-the empire. Under the four general heads:&mdash;</p>
-
-<table summary="reforms" border="0" width="100%"><tr>
-<td class="tdr vertt">I.</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent">The Government proper (<em>Mejalice devleti aliie</em>);</p></td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdr vertt">II.</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent">The Administration (<em>Zaptié ve mulkie memourlari</em>);</p></td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdr vertt">III.</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent">Justice and Public Instruction (<em>Ylmie</em>);</p></td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdr vertt">IV.</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent">The Army and Navy (<em>Seifiie</em>),</p></td>
-</tr></table>
-
-<p>it gave the most elaborate directions for the organisation
-of each branch of the public service. Considering the
-condition of confusion into which the administration of
-the country had fallen in the course of ages, and the
-absence of any guiding principle in it, the <em>Tanzimat</em>
-must be considered one of the most remarkable efforts
-of administrative organisation ever displayed in any
-country, and a monument of the genius of Reshid Pasha.
-It is not altogether without reason that he has been
-called the “Richelieu of Turkey.”</p>
-
-<p>But it does not suffice to decree great changes; it is
-in the endeavour to reduce them to practice that the chief<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">23</a></span>
-difficulty arises. And no great wonder if in a country
-like Turkey, where vested interests had grown around
-the old order of things; where conservative prejudices,
-as in every country in the world, obstruct the path of
-reform; where trained civil servants did not exist but
-had to be created, that the execution of these important
-and all‐embracing reforms should not have taken place
-by decree as by a magician’s wand, but required time
-and patience for their realisation. Events, too, were taking
-place in Europe which were destined to change the aspect
-of things and divert the minds of statesmen from internal
-organisation to the necessities of defending the existence
-of the national independence. The revolutionary movement
-of 1848–1849 in Europe afforded a little respite to
-a country outside the sphere of this movement, and it
-was just at this disturbed period of the rest of Europe
-that Turkey enjoyed the greatest peace and made the
-greatest progress in the work of re‐organisation. But
-scarcely had the revolutionary effervescence calmed down
-in Europe, and the fears connected with it been laid to rest,
-when the Emperor Nicholas&mdash;who had finally suppressed
-the Magyar insurrection and restored Hungary to the
-House of Hapsburg&mdash;turned his attention once more to
-Turkey, and resolved on decisive action. To suppose
-that the progress in organisation that was being effected
-in that country was not entirely unconnected with this
-determination would be only to deny that the arguments
-and reasons of State put forward by Pozzo di Borgo, in
-1828, were operative in the mind of the Emperor Nicholas
-twenty years later:</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“When the Imperial Cabinet examines the question
-as to whether the moment had not arrived to take up
-arms against the Porte, some doubt might possibly have
-existed as to the urgency of such a measure in the minds
-of those who had not sufficiently meditated on the effects
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">24</a></span>of the sanguinary reform (destruction of Janissaries) that
-the Ottoman ruler had just executed with such terrible
-force. Now, however, the experience that we have just
-had ought to enlist the sympathy of all in favour of the
-course that we have adopted. The Emperor has put the
-new Turkish system to the proof, and His Majesty has
-discovered in it a commencement of moral and physical
-organisation which it never possessed before. If the
-Sultan has been enabled to oppose to us a more spirited
-and regular resistance than before, whilst scarcely able
-to put together the elements of his new plan of reform
-and amelioration, how much the more formidable should
-we have found him if he had had the time to give it
-more solidity.”<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">5</a></p></div>
-
-<p>However that may be, hardly had the Russian troops
-withdrawn from Hungary than the Emperor Nicholas,
-addressing Sir Hamilton Seymour, the English
-Ambassador at St Petersburg, dwelt on the moribund
-condition of the Turkish Empire, and proposed to him
-its partition. Crete and Egypt were to be the spoils
-of England, whereas Servia, Montenegro, Wallachia,
-Moldavia, and Bulgaria were to fall to the share of
-Russia. This offer was duly reported to the Cabinet
-of St James, and categorically declined by it. The
-state of Europe at the time was not unfavourable to the
-Czar’s designs. Austria was bound to Russia by gratitude
-for important services rendered, and only Metternich suspected
-her to be then capable of “stupendous ingratitude.”
-Prussia was united to the Czar by ties of near kindred,
-and by her traditional indifference to the affairs of the
-East. France having fallen into the hands of a sovereign
-capable of reviving Napoleonic traditions, was as much
-an object of suspicion to all the crowned heads of Europe
-as by his <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">coup d’état</i> he was to liberal opinion throughout
-the world. The last thing that seemed likely, or even
-possible, was a coalition between Napoleonic France and
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">25</a></span>the England of Lord Aberdeen. The omens seemed
-favourable for striking a decisive blow.</p>
-
-<p>A quarrel in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre at
-Jerusalem, between Greek and Latin monks, afforded the
-desired pretext. After some diplomatic haggling between
-the Porte and France, in which the latter first put forward
-and then withdrew claims which would have afforded a
-precedent and pretext for Russian pretensions, Prince
-Mentchikoff suddenly appeared, with much bluster, at
-Constantinople, as the bearer of an Ultimatum demanding
-the assent of the Porte, within the space of five days, to a
-Russian protectorate over all the Orthodox subjects of
-the Sultan in his dominions. Europe, startled by the
-brusqueness of this action, as well as the serious import of
-the demand, endeavoured immediately to interpose her
-mediation to avert a crisis. Sir Strafford de Redcliffe and
-Mr de la Cour, who happened to be absent from Constantinople
-on the arrival of Prince Mentchikoff, returned
-precipitately to their posts, and, seconded by the Austrian
-Ambassador, Prince Leiningen, spared no effort that ingenuity
-could devise to give effect to their conciliatory
-instructions. But as no compromise could possibly be
-found between the pretensions put forward in the Ultimatum
-and what the Porte was willing to concede,
-Prince Mentchikoff had the escutcheon removed from the
-Russian Embassy at Pera, and with his whole suite quitted
-Constantinople.</p>
-
-<p>Three weeks after this (31st May 1853), Count
-Nesselrode despatched another Ultimatum reiterating the
-same demands, and giving the Porte eight days within
-which to execute them. The only answer vouchsafed to
-this document was the proclamation by the Sultan, on
-the 6th June, of a new Hatti Cherif confirming the rights
-and privileges of all the Christian subjects of the empire.
-The combined French and English fleets, at the same<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">26</a></span>
-time, received orders to sail to Besika Bay, and although
-war was not formally declared, the Emperor Nicholas
-gave orders for his armies to cross the Pruth and to seize
-the Danubian principalities as a “material guarantee” for
-compliance with his demands.</p>
-
-<p>It was not till 28th September that war was formally
-declared between Russia and Turkey, and that Omar
-Pasha received orders to summon the Russian Commander
-to evacuate the principalities. The interval between this
-period and the date of Prince Mentchikoff’s mission had
-been employed by a lively diplomatic correspondence
-between Lord Clarendon and Mr Drouyn de Lluys, on one
-side, and Prince Gortchakoff on the other, relative to the
-interpretation of the seventh clause of the Treaty of
-Kainardje, on which Russia based her claims to
-interfere with the Christian subjects of the Ottoman
-Empire. The destruction of a Turkish squadron by a
-superior Russian fleet in the harbour of Sinope at last
-terminated this diplomatic interlude, and brought the
-armed forces of England and France into the field. On
-the 27th December the allied fleets entered the Black
-Sea, and an expeditionary force was sent to Varna and
-the Dobrutcha.</p>
-
-<p>Here is the place to note the influence exercised on the
-course of events by the action of Austria.</p>
-
-<p>It was one of the principal aims of English and French
-diplomacy at this period to secure the co‐operation of the
-Middle Empire. By her geographical position and the
-revived force of her empire, as well as by the magnitude
-of her interests in the Eastern Question, she seemed called
-upon to exercise a preponderant influence on the issue of
-the coming struggle. It was even generally taken for
-granted that, could her active co‐operation be secured,
-such powerful pressure could be brought to bear on Russia
-as would secure the objects of the Western nations<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">27</a></span>
-without actual recourse to arms; and, at any rate, that if
-Russia were still to persist in her policy of encroachment,
-the military forces at the command of the coalition would
-be so overwhelming as to compel her rapidly to retreat
-from the position she had taken up. Austria was
-generally considered to hold the key of the situation.</p>
-
-<p>There was no lack of political motive on the part of
-Austria to bring her into line with Western Powers. The
-free navigation of the Danube, the arrest of the dangerous
-Panslavic propaganda of Russia, the curbing of limitless
-ambition of her colossal neighbour, were undoubtedly
-objects of State policy of the first magnitude. On the
-other hand, strong dynastic sympathies, and the obligations
-of gratitude for important services recently rendered,
-weighed heavily in the opposite scales. The result of
-these conflicting motives was a line of conduct which,
-whilst diplomatically supporting the contentions of the allied
-Cabinets, seriously hampered their military resolutions.</p>
-
-<p>Had Austria not placed her veto on the march of the
-allied armies into Poland, that country would have become
-the battle‐field between the forces of the East and West, and
-as far as human forecast can determine, the whole face of
-Europe would have been changed, the Eastern Question
-would have been settled for ever, and the nightmare of
-Cossack preponderance lifted once for all from the
-shoulders of Western civilisation.</p>
-
-<p>Instead of prosecuting the war on the continent of
-Europe, an expedition to the Crimea was resolved upon,
-and a French and English army landed at Eupatoria,
-and after a victorious advance across the Alma, and
-making a flank march to the south side of Sevastopol,
-they invested that portion of the great arsenal of Sevastopol
-which after two years’ siege and the taking of the fortress
-of Malakoff, at last surrendered to the allied army.</p>
-
-<p>On the 25th February 1856, a congress was assembled<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">28</a></span>
-at Paris, and on the 30th March the Treaty of Paris was
-signed by the plenipotentiaries of Russia, Turkey, England,
-France, Prussia and Italy, by which Turkey was admitted
-into the full benefits of international law, and into the
-Concert of Europe, and all right of interference in her
-internal affairs was expressly disclaimed and repudiated
-by all the Signatories. Russia and Turkey were expressly
-debarred from maintaining any armed forces in the Black
-Sea, and a small strip of Bessarabia was ceded by Russia
-to the Danubian principalities.</p>
-
-<p>This was followed by the proclamation of a new Hatti
-Cherif on the part of the Sultan, which closed this particular
-chapter of the history of Europe.</p>
-
-<p>Before concluding this short epitome of the history of
-the Ottoman Empire, and proceeding with the narrative of
-the life of Midhat Pasha, the incidents of whose career
-begin at this point to be interwoven with the general
-history of his country, it will be useful to cast a glance at
-the state of Europe and the general trend of events and
-alliances that succeeded the settlement of 1856.</p>
-
-<p>The death of the Sultan, Abdul Medjid (1861), and the
-character of his successor were the chief factors, as will
-shortly be seen, that influenced the direct destinies of
-Turkey. Unfortunately, in a country where absolutism
-had gradually become the established form of government,
-this was, and could only be, the determining element in
-the problem of government</p>
-
-<p>Russia, defeated but not humiliated, or even seriously
-crippled in a war which had, however, strained her
-resources, and absorbed by the great measure of the
-emancipation of her serfs, which inaugurated and
-rendered illustrious the reign of the successor of Nicholas,
-was, to employ the now classic phrase of Prince Gortchakoff,
-“collecting herself” (<cite>La Russie se recueille</cite>). This did
-not, however, prevent her giving a free hand, and even<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">29</a></span>
-officious support, to the Panslavic Committees of
-Moscow and of Kieff, that now, through the promptings
-and under the direction of Katkoff and his school, entered
-upon a militant career, and the crafty Ignatieff was sent
-to Constantinople to defend and support the machinations
-of these committees, and to play with consummate
-astuteness on the weaknesses and vices of a sovereign
-who possessed none of the qualities of his three
-predecessors, but was remarkable only for an inordinate
-passion for expenditure and a morbid jealousy of his
-autocratic power. His perfect sanity, moreover, became
-more and more questionable.</p>
-
-<p>With respect to France, from the first meeting of the
-plenipotentiaries at Paris, in May 1856, it became
-evident that a change had come over the spirit of
-the Court of the Tuileries. The representatives of
-France no longer showed themselves as irreconcilable to
-the views of Russia as was the case when Mr Drouyn de
-Lluys penned his famous despatches two years before,
-and in the discussions that took place at the Congress,
-and still more in the various Commissions appointed to
-settle the details of the articles of peace, the envoys of
-France were found to be constantly ranged on the side
-of Russia, whereas the views and contentions of England
-and Turkey were invariably supported by the representatives
-of Austria.</p>
-
-<p>This new orientation of French politics, which
-continued to the time of the Polish insurrection in
-1862, was further emphasised by the exceptional pomp
-and circumstances attending the French mission to
-St Petersburg, on the occasion of the coronation of the
-new Czar. The matrimonial and political <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">rapprochement</i>,
-too, between the House of Savoy and the Napoleons,
-culminating in the war of 1859, was a further cause
-of estrangement between France and Austria.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">30</a></span></p>
-
-<p>In compensation, however, for the gradual parting of
-the ways of French and English diplomacy in the East,
-the Cabinet of Vienna seemed to have reverted frankly
-to what may be called the normal policy of Austria with
-reference to Turkey, and the policy of Metternich and
-Castlereagh was for a time steadily and consistently
-followed by Buol and Palmerston. This state of things
-continued until the double election of Prince Couza in
-the Danubian principalities caused a rift in the alliance.</p>
-
-<p>To Austria everything connected with the free
-navigation of the Danube and the political status of the
-provinces bordering on that great artery is, and must
-ever be, State interests of the first magnitude.</p>
-
-<p>To England, apart from their indirect bearing on the
-integrity and independence of Turkey, these questions
-were only matters of sentimental interest founded on
-academic sympathy with the general principle of nationalities.
-This sentiment, however, called into activity by
-the events unrolling themselves in Italy, was particularly
-strong in England at the time when the question of
-the principalities presented itself as a practical problem
-to the statesmen of Europe, and found in the Prime
-Minister of the day, Mr Gladstone, one of its keenest
-and most enthusiastic partisans. England completely
-severed her policy on this occasion from that of Austria.
-Whether such conduct, with reference to a branch of a
-much larger problem, was quite consistent with an Eastern
-policy considered as a whole, and whether such a deviation
-from the obligation of loyalty to an indispensable ally
-was or was not responsible for much of what subsequently
-occurred, is perhaps too delicate a question to be discussed
-here. Certain, however, is it that the desertion of Austria
-on this occasion by the ally she counted on in Eastern
-matters to maintain intact the provisions of the Treaty
-of Paris, and the instability of English foreign policy<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">31</a></span>
-that it revealed, made a profound impression on the
-minds of the Austrian Emperor and his counsellors, and
-justified in their view the revolution that subsequently
-took place in the Eastern policy of Austria. Placed as
-the Middle Empire is&mdash;between jealous rivals and powerful
-neighbours, and with enormous and vital interests to
-safeguard&mdash;it is obliged to lean on one system of alliance
-or another, and what has been called “la politique du
-Cascole” is, as it were, a necessity of her position, and
-even a condition of her existence. When the events
-connected with the Herzegovinian insurrection come to
-be narrated in these pages, the part taken in them by
-Austria, and the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">rôle</i> played by her statesmen throughout
-the long negotiations preceding the Russo‐Turkish War and
-during its continuance, until the final act of the comedy
-enacted at Berlin, will have to be clearly set forth in detail,
-for it was Austria that played the chief part in all of them,
-and that finally secured the chief part in the spoil.</p>
-
-<p>This chapter, which only seeks to point out the particular
-circumstances that determined a change of policy
-on Eastern matters on the part of this empire, must be
-considered rather as an apology for, than an indictment
-of Austria with respect to Turkey. Moreover, it is the
-author’s aim throughout this work to narrate and explain
-events according to the lights vouchsafed to him, rather
-than to accuse any nation of bad faith or unjustifiable
-aggression with respect to his country. A nation worthy
-to exist at all must exist by its own strength and vigour,
-and not by the sufferance of its neighbours; and indeed
-the only indictment which will be proclaimed in this book
-will be against the descendants of the Othmans, Orkhans,
-Solimans, Bayazids and Mahmouds who have turned their
-backs on the traditions of their faith, and have allowed the
-muscles of the nation to be relaxed, and its heritage to
-become the prey of the spoiler.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">32</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER II<br /><br />
-
-<small>MIDHAT’S EARLY YEARS</small></h2>
-
-<p><span class="smcap">Midhat</span> was born at Constantinople in 1822. His father,
-Hadji Ali Effendi, was a native of Rustchuk, and gave
-his son the usual education provided by the local schools,
-until he was of an age to follow him in his different displacements,
-first to Widdin and Lofdja, and afterwards to
-Constantinople in 1836. A few years after this he
-obtained a position in the Secretariat of the Grand Vizier’s
-office, whence he was promoted to superior employment
-in the provinces. He remained two years at Damascus,
-and then, after a short interval spent in Constantinople,
-he proceeded, in 1844, to Konia, as secretary to Sami Bekir
-Pasha’s Council. In 1849 he was nominated to the
-Presidency of the <em>Medjlissi‐Vala</em> (Grand Council of State)
-and promoted to the rank of Sanie, which is the first rank
-in the Ottoman hierarchy, and in 1851 to that of Mutemaiz,
-with the functions of First Secretary to the Grand Council.</p>
-
-<p>Soon after this, difficulties in the provinces of Damascus
-and Aleppo, connected with the Custom House, and with
-the conduct of the Commander‐in‐Chief of the Army of
-Arabia, Kibrissli Mehemet Pasha, necessitated the despatch
-of a public functionary with full power to inquire into the
-irregularities, civil and military, which were notorious in
-those provinces. Midhat was chosen for this important
-and confidential mission. In the space of six months he
-settled the question of the Customs in favour of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">33</a></span>
-Government, by which the sum in dispute, £T150,000,
-was restored to the Ottoman Treasury, and a further
-surplus of £70,000 was secured. He further fixed the
-responsibility for the insurrection of the Druses on the
-Commander‐in‐Chief, Kibrissli Mehemet Pasha, and recommended
-his recall.</p>
-
-<p>The courage and capacity of which Midhat gave proof
-in this mission attracted to him the attention of the Grand
-Vizier of the day, the famous Reshid Pasha, who appointed
-him to a confidential post in the Superior Council of the
-State, which he occupied during the successive Grand
-Vizierates of Reshid, Aali, and Great Rifat Pashas. This
-may be considered the initiation of Midhat into political,
-as distinguished from administrative, life. It was in this
-post that he assisted, in 1852, at the historical interview
-between Rifat Pasha, Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs,
-and Prince Mentchikoff, the special envoy of the Emperor
-Nicholas, in the negotiations that preceded the Crimean
-War.</p>
-
-<p>In 1854, Kibrissli Mehemet Pasha, who in consequence
-of Midhat’s report had been dismissed from the command
-of the Syrian Army Corps, became Grand Vizier. He
-now charged Midhat with the difficult and delicate
-mission of pacifying the disturbed provinces of Adrianople
-and the Balkans, and clearing them of the brigandage
-that infested them. The organising genius of Midhat
-proved equal to the task. He suppressed brigandage
-with a strong hand, and by restoring tranquillity in this
-district he deprived the neighbouring States of all pretexts
-for chronic complaints. To prevent the return of trouble
-he further elaborated a whole plan of re‐organisation,
-which he submitted to the approval of the Government
-at Constantinople, where Reshid Pasha had again become
-Grand Vizier. The draft of this plan arrived at the very
-time that Reshid and Aali Pashas were engaged in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">34</a></span>
-drawing up regulations for the government of the <em>Eyalets</em>
-(provinces), with a view to their decentralisation. Midhat’s
-plan was accepted, and it was decided that he should be
-nominated to the governorship of the important province
-of the Danube (Bulgaria), when suddenly another change
-of Ministry at Constantinople delayed the execution of
-the whole plan of reform. In the meantime an appalling
-earthquake at Broussa had caused terrible damage in
-that important city and much misery among its inhabitants.
-Midhat was now despatched thither with a mission to
-succour sufferers and to help to restore confidence among
-the terrified inhabitants.</p>
-
-<p>On his return from Broussa he was despatched as
-special commissioner to inspect the provinces of Widdin
-and Silistria, which were in open rebellion against the
-central authorities. Here Midhat, as he had previously
-done in Syria, made a detailed report, pointing out the
-faulty administration of the provinces, and fearlessly
-inculpating the two Valis (governors).</p>
-
-<p>This discharge of a public duty was met by the usual
-manœuvres of inculpated Pashas. Their friends at the
-Palace bestirred themselves in their favour, and induced
-the Sultan to reject the proposals of Midhat, and to
-send a well‐known Ulema at Constantinople, Haireddin
-Effendi, to the two vilayets in question, to make a further
-report in verification or contradiction of that of Midhat.
-To the confusion and disappointment of the friends of the
-incriminated Valis, Haireddin Effendi made a report in
-every way confirming the views and recommendations,
-and emphasizing the accusations of Midhat.</p>
-
-<p>At this time (1858) Reshid Pasha died, and Aali Pasha,
-his successor, obtained six months’ leave of absence for
-Midhat, to be spent in travelling in Europe, with a view
-to the study of certain points of European administration
-with which he desired to make himself acquainted. Paris,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">35</a></span>
-London, Vienna, and Brussels were successively visited
-in this short period of time, and much valuable information
-obtained, both as to the spirit and working of
-European governments.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat had by this time already acquired a certain
-reputation as a successful provincial governor and whenever
-trouble in the empire declared itself, his name
-recurred as a fit and proper person to be despatched as
-special envoy or governor to pacify the province in
-question. Kibrissli Mehemet Pasha had now again
-become Grand Vizier, and as trouble of a serious
-kind had for some time been brewing in the vilayet of
-Nish (Servia), where, in spite of the presence of an imposing
-force of regular and irregular troops, insecurity
-of life and property was rampant, and an alarming emigration
-of the inhabitants was taking place, he nominated
-Midhat to the Governorship of this important province
-(1861).</p>
-
-<p>Midhat resolved to make an attempt to pacify
-the province without the use of armed force, and to
-gain the confidence of the Bulgarians by the redress of
-their just grievances. His first step was to invite the
-notabilities of the different districts to conferences, to
-state their complaints, and attentively examine with him
-the remedies that should be applied. These grievances
-practically resolved themselves into two: (1) the entire
-absence of roads and other means of intercommunication,
-which made it impossible for the inhabitants&mdash;exclusively
-cultivators of the soil&mdash;to find markets for their produce;
-(2) the rampant brigandage that everywhere existed,
-rendering life and property insecure. These two causes,
-it was, that induced the emigration into Servia, which
-was assuming large proportions, where the Bulgarians
-found among their fellow‐Slavs both greater security and
-more favourable conditions of labour.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">36</a></span></p>
-
-<p>Midhat readily acknowledged the justice and reasonableness
-of these complaints, and proceeded to strike a
-bargain with the notables. They were to undertake to
-use their influence to pacify the country and discourage
-emigration for two years, and Midhat engaged within
-this time to carry out the reforms and improvements
-that were mutually agreed upon between them. Midhat
-strictly carried out the terms of this agreement. He
-ordered the troops back to their barracks, commenced
-the great high road between Nish and Sofia with the
-byroads connected with it, and by means of military
-patrols sent out in every direction, brigandage very soon
-entirely disappeared from the country. Roads were now
-being laid out in every direction, and bridges constructed
-over the Morava and other rivers, so as to meet the requirements
-of an agricultural population, and facilitate the
-outlet for their produce. An elaborate system of block‐houses
-all along the Servian frontier put an end to the
-incursions of armed bands of Servians, which had long
-fostered and sustained disturbance in the province, and
-many Bulgarian families who had emigrated into Servia
-now began to return to their former habitations. Concurrently
-with these material ameliorations, Midhat
-occupied himself with the solution of other economical
-and moral problems that concerned the well‐being of
-the community. The relations between proprietors and
-tenants of the soil had long been in an unsatisfactory
-condition. Midhat convoked representatives of both these
-classes to a conference, and with much pains, and after
-long discussions, he succeeded in finding a means of
-reconciliation between their opposing pretensions, to the
-satisfaction of both parties.</p>
-
-<p>At Prisrend, in that part of the provinces inhabited
-by the Arnauts, he was confronted with problems of a
-peculiar nature. Here a vendetta (similar to the Corsican<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">37</a></span>
-vendetta) existed among the unruly mountaineers of
-Albanian descent. Midhat, faithful to his system of
-working hand in hand with the inhabitants themselves,
-convoked an assembly of notables of the district, and
-with their co‐operation, and by their own initiative, instituted
-a permanent commission to settle money compositions
-for bloodshed, and by this means he succeeded
-in suppressing a vendetta that had existed for centuries
-among this brave but unruly people. He further induced
-them to give up the practice of carrying arms, and, for
-the first time in the history of the provinces, to submit to
-Imperial conscription; he further organised a <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">gendarmerie</i>,
-secured the peaceful collection of taxes, and put an end
-to all religious persecution; schools, too, were established,
-and hospitals for members of all religious denominations
-without distinction. Thus the vilayets of Nish and
-Prisrend gradually recovered the full enjoyment of tranquillity
-and peace, and Christians and Mussulmans alike
-began to enjoy the prospect of returning prosperity.</p>
-
-<p>In the provinces of Widdin and Silistria the problem
-of pacification was complicated by a factor which rendered
-the solution far more difficult. Here the continued and
-systematic interference of Russia by means of her consuls
-and agents, supported by the Russian ambassador at
-Constantinople, working hand in hand with the agents
-of the Slav Committees, who were overrunning the
-country and preaching the gospel of rebellion, created
-quite a new set of problems to be dealt with. It was no
-longer local grievances to be redressed, but a political
-propagandism to be faced.</p>
-
-<p>Aali and Fuad Pashas, the successors of Reshid Pasha,
-appreciating the administrative and reforming talents of
-Midhat, summoned him in 1864 to Constantinople, to
-consider with them a general organic law for the government
-of the provinces of the empire (<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">loi des vilayets</i>), and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">38</a></span>
-it was there resolved that the vilayets of Silistria, Widdin,
-and Nish should be combined into a single government
-under the name of the “Vilayet of the Danube,” and entrusted
-to Midhat. The Imperial sanction to this appointment
-and to the organic reforms proposed was obtained
-(in 1865) in spite of the opposition of the reactionary party
-in Constantinople, headed by the Sheik‐ul‐Islam of the
-day, Saadeddine Effendi, strenuously backed by Sourrouri
-Effendi Naib, an avowed enemy of the new Vali, whom we
-shall meet with later on figuring, as a reward for his zeal,
-and in acknowledgment of his impartiality, as the President
-of the tribunal that tried and condemned Midhat. But
-the influence of Fuad Pasha was sufficient to overcome
-all such opposition, and Midhat forthwith entered upon
-his new and important functions.</p>
-
-<p>It will be sufficient to give a summary account of
-the radical reforms introduced by the new Vali in the
-government of this important province.</p>
-
-<p>The whole vilayet was divided into seven distinct
-<em>sandjaks</em> (districts), the sandjak into <em>cazas</em> (cantons), and
-the cazas into <em>nahies</em> (communes), and in each of these
-centres councils were created for the levying of taxes and
-local administration of the district.</p>
-
-<p>Forced labour (<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">corvée</i>) was abolished; bridges to the
-number of 1400 were constructed; and 3000 kilometres
-(circ. 2000 miles) of roads constructed; brigandage was
-effectually stamped out and a local <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">gendarmerie</i> raised, and
-agricultural banks, with a view of relieving the small farmer
-from the exactions of the usurer, established. The capital
-for these purposes was procured by an ingenious system,
-founded on the cultivation of the public and waste lands,
-by which not only was relief given to distressed and needy
-agriculturists, but a local fund was created for important
-local improvements. Agriculture, the staple industry of
-the inhabitants, soon began to flourish in consequence<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">39</a></span>
-of these wise and energetic measures, and with agriculture
-the affiliated industries and commerce of the country. The
-navigation of the Danube, the great artery of the province,
-next engaged the attention of the Pasha, and soon two,
-and then four, vessels, flying the Ottoman flag for the first
-time, made their appearance on this river. A postal
-service was likewise started, and through the initiative of
-the governor a manufactory of carriages established at
-Rustchuk, which at the end of the very first year paid
-a dividend of 10 per cent. Charitable institutions too
-were not neglected, and orphan asylums for Christian and
-Mahomedan children alike were constructed at Rustchuk
-and Sofia, and the pupils initiated in trades and
-industries.</p>
-
-<p>The key of all these reforms, and the cardinal principle
-of this administration, was to work hand in hand with the
-local authorities. By their aid the valuation of all property
-held in the respective districts was carried out equitably
-and fairly, and taxes founded on this assessment were
-levied without complaint; and although the salaries of
-responsible officials, such as the police and judges,
-were considerably increased, and many vexatious taxes
-abolished, the new revenue of the province showed a
-considerable and increasing surplus.</p>
-
-<p>The prosperity of this large province under its new
-administrator could not fail to attract the attention of the
-authorities at Constantinople, and Midhat now received
-the congratulations both of the Sultan and of the Sublime
-Porte. An Imperial Irade, moreover, enjoined all the
-governors of the other provinces of the empire to apply
-in their respective vilayets the same reforms that Midhat
-had introduced in that of the Danube, a detailed plan and
-description of which had been forwarded to Constantinople
-by Rifat Effendi, the secretary of the vilayet (subsequently
-Grand Vizier).</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">40</a></span></p>
-
-<p>So far everything seemed to go well, and a new era of
-prosperity seemed about to dawn for the provinces of the
-empire generally. It is worth while for those who really
-desire to obtain an inside view of the working of Turkish
-absolutism, and to discern the secret springs that move the
-Government of Turkey, and make themselves acquainted
-with the hidden causes that have time after time wrecked
-the hopes of Turkish reformers, to follow attentively what
-we are now about to relate, on the authority, be it noted, of
-one in a position, if any one was, to know the truth and
-put his fingers on the plague‐spot.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat felt that his work would not be complete,
-nor would the return of material prosperity suffice to
-attach his province permanently to the Government of
-the Sultan, unless he applied himself as well to the moral
-side of the problem and succeeded in counteracting the
-manœuvres of the enemies of the empire to sow disaffection
-in the minds of the youth of the province.
-One of the most effective devices contrived by them
-with this view was the plan, pursued for many years, of
-sending large numbers of Bulgarian youths to carry on
-their studies at the Russian universities of Odessa,
-Kharkoff, and Kieff, and these, on their return, became
-the chiefs of the staffs of the active propagandists of
-Panslavic ideas among the youths of Bulgaria. These
-missionaries of disaffection constituted one of the most
-serious dangers to Ottoman sovereignty, and one of the
-most difficult problems to deal with. Midhat determined
-to grapple with it, and with this view he determined to
-establish in the principal centres of the province schools
-and universities where the Bulgarian youths, Christians
-and Mussulmans alike, should enjoy all the advantages
-of a first‐class modern education without having to
-seek it abroad. The incidental advantage of a fusion
-of Christian and Mussulman elements in the country,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">41</a></span>
-under the inspiring influence of a common education, at
-an age when friendships are most easily formed and
-generous sentiments evoked, did not escape the sagacity
-of Midhat. The whole project was explained by him
-in a detailed report to the Sublime Porte, the expenses
-being provided half by the surplus revenues of the
-province, and the rest by voluntary subscriptions.</p>
-
-<p>When this project was made known at Constantinople,
-the person who most readily seized the full import of it
-was General Ignatieff, the Russian ambassador. It went
-directly counter to all the most cherished plans and
-projects of the Panslavic party, of which he was the
-moving spirit. There was nothing that he did not do
-to wreck the plan and upset the Pasha. Unfortunately
-the nature of an absolute government and the character
-of an Eastern autocrat afforded him ample means of
-action. The interference of a foreign ambassador in the
-internal economy of a province of the empire had nothing
-in it which appeared abnormal or impertinent; such
-interference was consecrated by long usage and had
-become chronic and accepted. Ignatieff began by representing
-to the sovereign that the spirit of the reforms
-effected by Midhat in his vilayet, especially the institution
-of local councils (which was of the very essence of
-the reforms introduced), were in direct opposition to
-the spirit of absolutism, and that the result would infallibly
-be that little by little the province itself would become
-detached from the body of the empire, and would claim
-its entire independence, as had already happened in the
-case of Egypt. It is not certain, however, that the
-ambassador would have gained his point, even with a
-sovereign so tenacious of his prerogatives as was Abdul
-Aziz, had not an unfortunate error of typography, eagerly
-seized on and exploited by Ignatieff, played into the
-hands of the ambassador. In a passage of the official<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">42</a></span>
-journal of the province, the term “deputies” was inadvertently
-applied to the members of the chief council
-of the vilayet. This apparently trivial circumstance, the
-slip of a typographist, was sufficient to turn the scale
-in the Sultan’s mind and to wreck the project. Abdul
-Aziz refused his consent to the proposal, on the obviously
-insincere pretext of the expense connected with it. Thus
-this crowning act of Midhat’s work, the reform which
-above all others was calculated to attach the Bulgarians
-to the central government and to destroy a nest of disaffectation
-in the province, was defeated by a foreign
-ambassador playing on the ignorant susceptibilities and
-autocratic instincts of the sovereign of the country. If
-this were a single and exceptional example of the working
-of autocracy, it might be passed over in comparative
-silence, however regrettable it was in this particular
-instance; but the whole modern history of Turkey shows
-that such intervention was nothing less than a system
-of statecraft whereby autocracy was cunningly worked
-for the ruin of the country in as certain and deadly a
-way as was the <em>Liberum Veto</em> of the Polish constitution.
-The spontaneous caprices and whims of an autocrat
-are the least part of the baneful effects of autocracy; it
-is in the shadows that flit behind the throne, stronger
-than the throne itself, working systematically on the
-ignorance and fears of the autocrat, with settled purpose
-and in pursuit of settled plans, that lies, in the East
-at any rate, the real curse of absolutism.</p>
-
-<p>Simultaneously with this diplomatic action at Constantinople,
-order was given to the Panslavic Committees
-established at Bucharest and Kichenew to prepare for action
-in the field. Midhat’s agents had kept him informed of
-the revival of agitation entertained by the agents of these
-committees among the Bulgarian peasants, and he lost no
-time in transmitting this information to the Porte.<br /></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 600px;">
-<img src="images/i_042fp.jpg" width="600" height="376" alt="" />
-<p class="center2"><span class="smcap">Midhat Pasha and his Suite in the Government of the Province of the Danube.</span></p>
-<table class="content" summary="Midhat and suite" width="100%"><tr>
-<td class="tdl vertt">1. Midhat Pasha.</td><td class="tdl padr1"><p class="indent2">2. “Inspecteur de la Cour Judiciare.”</p></td><td class="tdl vertt">3. “Juge du Cheri.”</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl padr1"><p class="indent2">4. Adib Effendi, Minister of Customs (1889).</p></td><td class="tdl padr1"><p class="indent2">5. Rifat Pasha, Grand Vizier (1897).</p></td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent2">6.&nbsp;Raïf Pasha, Minister (1890).</p></td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td><td class="tdl"><p class="indent2">7. Chakir Pasha, “Maréchal” (1878).</p></td><td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
-</tr></table></div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">43</a></span></p>
-
-<p>On the 2nd May, 1867, Midhat received the following
-telegram from Sistovo:&mdash;“Last night numerous armed
-bands crossed the frontier close to Sistovo, and were
-immediately joined by other bands who were waiting
-for them on this side of the frontier, and early this
-morning they commenced operations by the horrible
-mutilation of five Mussulman children, aged from eight
-to twelve, who were tending sheep on the plains.”</p>
-
-<p>The object and purpose of these barbarities was
-obvious: it was to excite reprisals on the part of the
-Mussulman population, which would afford a pretext
-to the enemies of the empire to fill Europe with an
-outcry against Turkish barbarity and fanaticism. The
-same policy, heralded by the same acts, ruthlessly
-pursued later on, did produce the desired effect, and
-Bulgarian atrocities became a proverb and byword in
-the world; but on this occasion the energy of Midhat,
-and the patience and forbearance of the Mussulman
-population, defeated the purpose of the conspirators.
-Midhat, immediately on receiving the above telegram,
-embarked two companies of regulars on board a steamer
-and despatched them to Sistovo, whither he accompanied
-them himself. He found the whole population, Christian
-and Mussulman, in a state of the greatest excitement,
-and his first care was to calm the effervescence and
-to inspire confidence in the energy and resolution of the
-authorities.</p>
-
-<p>The plan of the insurgents was to push on as rapidly
-as they could to the Balkans, increasing their forces as
-they went along by the native levies which had been
-organised by the committees for this purpose, until they
-reached the monastery of Kapanbova, where a large <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">dépôt</i>
-of arms had been collected, and which was intended to be
-the headquarters of the insurrection.</p>
-
-<p>The presence of four battalions of regulars at<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">44</a></span>
-Capriova prevented the execution of this plan, and after
-suffering several defeats in the field, the bands dispersed
-in various directions, closely pursued by the troops and the
-local levies that had joined them. Midhat now instituted
-a special tribunal, composed of six Mussulmans and six
-Christian judges, to try the rebel prisoners, and the
-evidence given by the prisoners themselves, clearly demonstrated
-that the invading bands had been equipped and
-sent out by the Slav Committees of Bucharest and
-Kichenew, and were acting in unison with corresponding
-committees established throughout the province. By the
-unanimous vote of this tribunal, sentences of death were
-passed on the leaders, and penal servitude and minor
-punishment, according to their status and degree of
-culpability, on all the rebels taken in arms. By these
-energetic means the insurrection was effectually stamped
-out and tranquillity restored to the province.</p>
-
-<p>An outcry, however, was quickly raised in the
-European Press against the “methods of barbarism”
-adopted to repress the insurrection, and the Pasha was
-accused of ultra severity against Christian insurgents and
-reprehensible leniency towards Mussulman offenders.</p>
-
-<p>So far from this latter accusation having any real
-foundation, the very composition of the special tribunal
-appointed to deal with these troubles was a guarantee of
-its impartiality. Moreover, the following fact will afford
-an example of the impunity enjoyed by the Mahomedan
-criminals. In the course of these troubles two dead bodies
-of Christians were found in a field near Biscara; a judicial
-investigation was immediately ordered on the spot, and
-the result was that the evidence pointed to a sergeant
-of <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">gendarmerie</i>, a Mussulman of the name of Mehemet
-Tchavouch, as having committed the murder. Pressed by
-questions Mehemet made a full confession, and he was
-thereupon condemned to death and forthwith executed.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">45</a></span></p>
-
-<p>Midhat now turned his attention to the best means of
-anticipating and guarding against similar raids and
-insurrections in the future. He knew well that the central
-revolutionary committees at Bucharest and Kichenew
-would not disarm, but would simply watch for a more
-favourable opportunity to put their plans into execution.
-To garrison the whole frontier with regular troops would
-expose the province to large expenditure, and the troops,
-when called upon to act, to calumny and misrepresentation.
-He accordingly conceived the plan of organising a local
-militia of 40,000 men, recruited from all classes of the
-population, Christian and Mussulman alike, to whom the
-defence of their own localities should be entrusted, and
-they were to be indemnified if called upon to act beyond
-the boundaries of their district. By this means a cheap
-and effective force was provided against all contingencies,
-and at the same time the confidence reposed in the
-loyalty of the population generally received a conspicuous
-demonstration. The defence of the line of the Danube
-was secured in a similar manner. A succession of guard‐houses
-was established throughout the length of the river,
-and their defence confided to a river‐guard recruited equally
-from the Christian and Mussulman riverine population.</p>
-
-<p>So ingenious was the plan of organisation, that the
-term of service for each guardsman did not exceed one
-month in ten years. The arms and equipments were
-provided by voluntary subscription raised from all the
-inhabitants of the province.</p>
-
-<p>During all this time the greater the energy shown by
-Midhat in the organisation, development and defence of
-this frontier province of the empire, the greater became
-the determination of the Slav Committees to undo and
-defeat his work.</p>
-
-<p>After the late exploits of these committees in Bulgaria,
-Midhat had organised a system of surveillance at the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">46</a></span>
-headquarters of these committees, and information having
-reached him that emissaries had been despatched from
-Galatz to Belgrade in order to organise a new raid
-into Bulgaria, he ordered these emissaries to be closely
-watched and followed in all their movements. On their
-embarkation at Rustchuk, on board the Austrian vessel
-<em>Germania</em>, he sent photographs of them to the Austrian
-Consul, with a request that the Ottoman authorities should
-be allowed to examine the passports of the passengers.
-Accompanied by an Austrian Consular Agent the Turkish
-authorities accordingly proceeded on board, where they were
-immediately received by shots from revolvers on the part
-of the two suspected agents, who had barricaded themselves
-in the saloon of the vessel, and had determined to resist
-arrest. After an indescribable scene of confusion among
-the panic‐stricken passengers aboard, the Turkish <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">gendarmerie</i>,
-acting with the consent of the Consul, succeeded
-in effecting the capture of the agents, who were both
-mortally wounded in the encounter.</p>
-
-<p>The capture of these revolutionary agents made a
-great noise in Europe. General Ignatieff at Constantinople,
-seized on the circumstance as a pretext to demand
-the recall of Midhat, accompanying the Servian Agent to
-the Palace in the audience accorded to the latter, whose
-complaints were founded on the fact that one of the
-captured agents was a Servian. Midhat’s influence, however,
-was still in the ascendant, and these intrigues
-remained for a time without effect.</p>
-
-<p>Other means failing, a desperate and criminal attempt
-was now made to get rid of this too energetic Pasha.
-Two attempts to assassinate him followed in quick
-succession, the first at Rustchuk, where the overseer of
-the training school fired a shot, fortunately without effect,
-on the Pasha as he was walking in the school enclosure;
-and the other by a Servian, who attempted to enter his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">47</a></span>
-service with the view to assassinating him, and who made
-a full confession seriously compromising two important
-personages in Servia. He was sent to Constantinople,
-tried, and condemned to penal servitude for life, in spite
-of the strenuous efforts of General Ignatieff in his favour.</p>
-
-<p>Not very long after these stirring events (1868)
-Midhat was summoned to Constantinople, where he was
-placed at the head of the Council of State, and he
-was succeeded in the governorship of the province, for
-which he had done so much, by Sabri Pasha, the deputy‐governor
-of Nish.</p>
-
-<p>As President of the Council, Midhat marked his short
-tenure of that office by the institution of a school of Arts
-and Sciences at Sultan Ahmed, in Stamboul, and by the
-establishment of a bank for loans, with the special
-purpose of relieving small employers from the tyranny
-of usurers. This bank (Emniet Sandighie) still exists.
-It soon, however, became obvious to Midhat that his
-system of usefulness in his new ministerial position was
-strictly limited; his authority in matters pertaining to his
-own office was constantly overruled on important matters,
-especially those concerning finance, by the Grand Vizier,
-acting on the authority of the Sultan, and this incompatibility
-of views culminated on the question of Turkish
-railways, whereupon Midhat insisted on resigning. Just
-at this time Nakieddine Pasha was dismissed from the
-governorship of the province of Bagdad, and Midhat was
-appointed Vali of Bagdad (1869).</p>
-
-<p>Hardly had the new Vali reached his post, when he
-found himself confronted with some difficult problems of
-quite a different order from those he had dealt with on
-the Danube, but of a not less serious description. The
-question of recruiting was the most urgent, and called for
-immediate solution. The Arab tribes, turbulent and independent
-by nature, had always shown themselves refractory<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">48</a></span>
-to enlistment, and were now in open revolt against its
-enforcement. One of the difficulties of the situation consisted
-in the fact that the military authority in the province
-was separated from the civil, and was in the hands of
-the commander of the 6th Army Corps, Samih Pasha,
-whereas the situation required all authority, military as
-well as civil, to be concentrated in the hands of a single
-strong central authority. Midhat did not hesitate at such
-a crisis to assume the full responsibility of this concentration,
-and took immediate military steps to suppress the
-insurrection by force. He ordered the city of Bagdad to
-be surrounded by cavalry, and sent infantry and artillery
-to protect the foreign Mission Houses and the non‐Mussulman
-quarters from the fanaticism of the Arabs.
-He at the same time ordered the bridge over the Tigris
-to be cut, so as to prevent intercommunication among
-the rebels; and when these energetic measures had fairly
-intimidated the Arabs, he offered them a general amnesty
-on condition of immediate surrender. These conditions
-were now accepted, and the insurrection suddenly
-collapsed, and no further resistance was offered to the
-recruiting. The promptitude with which this dangerous
-rebellion was suppressed was appreciated by the Porte,
-and a telegram was received from Constantinople approving
-the measures he had taken, and placing officially the
-supreme command of the 6th Army Corps in his hands.</p>
-
-<p>The next serious difficulty was connected with the
-levying of taxes. This had always been a difficult operation
-among the nomad tribes, of which the population in
-a great measure consisted, and was the cause of continual
-disputes and insurrections. Matters had, however, now
-reached a crisis, for a colonel at the head of a battalion of
-regulars sent to Divanie and Dogara to collect the tithes
-was surrounded by tribesmen to the number of ten
-thousand men, and himself killed and his troops killed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">49</a></span>
-or dispersed. The new Vali seized at once the seriousness
-of the situation, for the encouragement which this success
-afforded the tribesmen threatened to give rise to a general
-insurrection of all the surrounding nomads.</p>
-
-<p>It was necessary to avenge the defeat at once and
-to make a signal example of the tribesmen concerned.
-Midhat accordingly ordered a large force, consisting of
-seven battalions of infantry, four thousand cavalry, with
-a complement of artillery, to proceed directly to Dogara,
-under the command of Samih Pasha, whilst with three
-thousand chosen troops he hastened himself to the disaffected
-district. A pitched battle now took place between
-the Arabs and the troops, which resulted in the complete
-defeat of the former and the capture of their chief. A
-not unusual incident accompanied the close of the battle.
-A Shiite Sheik, Abdul Kerim, was marching at the head
-of a considerable force of tribesmen from the Shiite
-districts of Urfa and Aleppo to join the rebels, when
-he received the news of their defeat. Pretending that he
-was on the road to offer his services to the Government,
-he joined his forces to those of the Vali, and accompanied
-the victorious troops on their entry into Bagdad. A
-military tribunal was at once instituted to try the rebels;
-the rebel chiefs were condemned and executed, but the
-tribesmen, on the promise of future good behaviour, were
-released.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat Pasha clearly discerned that if an end was
-to be put to these chronic troubles, and these nomad
-tribes were to be reduced to anything like permanent
-order, it was not sufficient to defeat them in battle, and
-that a radical change had to be brought about in their
-general status, and especially the conditions of land
-tenure in the country. The Arab cultivator, for the most
-part, held his lands from the State on the condition of
-giving three‐fourths of the produce to the State, retaining<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">50</a></span>
-one‐fourth for himself. Such a system naturally discouraged
-agriculture and rendered all improvements in
-cultivation impossible. The consequence was that, for
-the most part, the Arab shunned the soil, preferring
-predatory to industrial modes of gaining his living.
-Midhat determined to attach him to the soil by giving
-him rights of proprietorship, and divided large tracts of
-land into plots, which were offered for sale on easy and
-advantageous terms, special provision being made against
-accumulation of plots into single hands. The success of
-this policy was remarkable, and whereas the revenues of
-the State increased, the turbulence of the tribesmen, and
-the risings which had become chronic, greatly diminished.</p>
-
-<p>The agricultural prosperity that resulted from these
-measures stimulated other branches of industry and
-rendered it necessary to provide outlets for the newly
-created surplus of the country. The first step in this
-direction was to render navigable the Tigris and
-Euphrates, the great arteries of the country, and to
-improve or create the means of communication between
-their two banks, and between the different towns situated
-along their course. The only service of the kind that
-existed consisted of the boats of an English company
-plying between Bagdad and Bussora. Midhat determined
-to start a service of Turkish boats to supply adequately
-the needs now felt, in the same way that he had formerly
-done on the Danube when he was Governor of Bulgaria.
-He ordered the existing vessels to be repaired, new
-vessels of a larger tonnage to be constructed, and coal
-<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">dépôts</i> to be formed at Mascat, Aden, Bender and
-Bushire; and now, for the first time in history, steamers
-under the Ottoman flag were to be seen periodically
-in the Suez Canal, on their way to Constantinople. The
-<em>Babel</em>, one of these vessels, which had originally cost
-£T88,000 for construction, was bought for the sum of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">51</a></span>
-£T33,000 from a bankrupt company, and on its very
-first voyage between Constantinople and Bussora, which
-coincided with the time of the pilgrimages, it cleared
-£T35,000&mdash;more than sufficient to cover its purchase
-price. A net surplus of £T1000 a month resulted from
-this improved river navigation, and Midhat now determined
-on extensive dredging works, with a view to
-extending the navigation northwards and adapting it
-to vessels of a larger tonnage. Chakir Bey (afterwards
-Marshal and Ambassador to St Petersburg, and one of
-Midhat’s faithful partisans) was despatched north with a
-company of engineers, and reported favourably on the
-enterprise. Thereupon dredging and other engineering
-works were immediately ordered to be undertaken.</p>
-
-<p>The periodical overflow of the waters of the Euphrates
-had converted large tracts of country into marshes, and
-marsh fevers in consequence becoming endemic, rendered
-them uninhabitable. Drainage works on a large scale,
-with a view of reclaiming these lands and of curing the
-insalubrity, were also undertaken. Irrigation works were
-likewise started, and much attention was devoted to this
-subject by the Pasha, with a view to gradually restoring
-the system introduced by the first Arab conquerors, which
-had converted this country into the Garden of the East,
-and rendered the Caliphate of Bagdad proverbial for its
-wealth and prosperity. A tramway, too, between Bagdad
-and Kiazimie was constructed, and its entire length, 7
-miles, completed within a year. A textile manufactory, too,
-was started, and an engine of 70‐h.p. ordered in France,
-the despatch of which was only delayed by the breaking
-out of the Franco‐German War (1870).</p>
-
-<p>Whilst energetically pursuing these material improvements,
-Midhat Pasha was far from neglecting the moral
-side of the problem of Reform. Schools were opened
-in every district; hospitals, refuges for old age, and loan<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">52</a></span>
-banks everywhere arose, and a printing‐press established
-where the newspaper <cite>Zora</cite> was published, and municipal
-institutions for lighting and watering and other local
-purposes were instituted in all the principal centres. A
-petroleum spring discovered in the vilayet was immediately
-utilised for public purposes. It was not too much
-to hope that a decade of such enlightened government
-would have repaired the neglect of centuries and restored
-their ancient prosperity to the rich valleys of the Tigris
-and Euphrates.</p>
-
-<p>In 1870 the Shah of Persia, accompanied by a
-numerous suite, came to visit the holy places of Nejef
-and Kerbela, and although the province had to support
-the whole expense of this costly visit, amounting to
-over £T30,000, Midhat Pasha determined to give the
-royal visitor a reception worthy of his exalted rank, and
-to profit by the occasion by settling some vexed questions
-long pending between the two neighbouring Mahomedan
-countries. The circulation of depreciated Persian money
-in the province had long disturbed the value of exchanges
-and created confusion in commercial transactions. The
-exchange value of this currency, and the amount of it
-to be issued in the future, were now agreed upon. The
-incursions and depredations of nomad Kurds, the Hamavends,
-Sendjabi, etc., shifting their camping‐ground from
-Persian to Turkish territory, and <em>vice versa</em>, so as to
-evade taxation and elude the authorities of either nation,
-whilst plundering indiscriminately the peaceful inhabitants
-of both, had long been a scandal, creating a state of
-affairs on the frontier difficult to cope with. A better
-understanding and a combined policy of surveillance
-between the Persian and Turkish authorities on the
-frontier were now established, and block‐houses on the
-model of those successfully introduced on the Servian
-frontier were constructed, to the infinite relief of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">53</a></span>
-agricultural population of both nations, situated on
-the entire length of this extensive line. Midhat Pasha
-failed, however, to obtain the sanction of the Persian
-authorities to a scheme which he had long cherished,
-and which he trusted to this occasion to be able to put
-into execution.</p>
-
-<p>At Nejef, one of the sacred places to which periodical
-pilgrimages were made, there were rich treasures, the
-proceeds of the offerings of Indian and Persian devotees
-of the Shiite sect during centuries past, which, on the
-invasion of the Wahabites, had been hidden in a cave.
-Midhat Pasha had ordered the cave to be opened and
-an official inventory to be made of the treasures that it
-contained. This inventory revealed treasures of diamonds,
-rubies, pearls, and other precious stones, to the value of
-no less than £T300,000, and Midhat proposed a public
-sale of the treasure and the appropriation of its proceeds
-to works of public utility, such as a railway between
-Persia and Bagdad, or, if such an appropriation of a sacred
-treasure appeared too secular, at least to the creation of
-such much‐needed institutions as hospitals and refuges
-and caravanserai for the pilgrims on the route of their
-pilgrimages to the holy places. Even this reasonable
-proposal, however, was vetoed by the Persian Ulemas,
-and the whole scheme falling through, Midhat ordered
-the treasure to be carefully deposited again in the cave
-from which it had been taken, and its entrance secured
-with the official seals of the Turkish and Persian
-authorities.</p>
-
-<p>Certain events now took place having a bearing beyond
-the boundaries of the province and of a quasi‐international
-character. The town of Bussora, important on account
-of its geographical position as the terminus station of
-the Euphrates on the Persian Gulf, suffered from the
-inconvenience of an extremely unhealthy climate, result<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">54</a></span>ing
-from the stagnant waters of the Achar, a branch of
-the river Shat‐el‐Arab, on which it was built. Midhat
-determined to remove the site of the township on to
-the main river, and with that view built a Governor’s
-house and Government buildings on the new site as a
-nucleus for a new city. Outside this enclosure, the
-township of Nassrieh was laid out on plans furnished by
-the Pasha, to become the capital of the sandjak of
-Muntefik, and to replace the old town of Suk esh‐sheyuh
-which was falling into ruins, and was deficient in all the
-necessaries of civilisation.</p>
-
-<p>Sixty miles from Bussora, and on the coast of Nedjed,
-is situated the little town of Koweit of six thousand houses,
-the inhabitants of which are all Mussulmans. Midhat
-Pasha’s predecessor, Namik Pasha, had endeavoured to
-bring this population within the influence of his jurisdiction,
-but they successfully resisted all attempts at imposing
-taxation upon them, and had maintained their
-quasi‐independence under their own chiefs, the descendants
-of one Sabah who had come with this tribe of
-“Moutayer” from Nedjed five hundred years before, and
-had maintained ever since with practical independence a
-republican form of government, choosing by election their
-own judges (<em>cadis</em>) and the professors of their religious
-schools (<em>medresses</em>). Owing to the restricted extent of
-their territory, the inhabitants, like those of Venice, took
-chiefly to maritime pursuits, and upwards of two hundred
-small vessels of various tonnage traversed in every
-direction the Indian Ocean, as far as the coasts of
-Zanzibar, and practically monopolised the pearl fisheries
-of the Persian Gulf. Although they had adopted a
-special flag of their own, they occasionally hoisted a
-Dutch or English flag, to secure certain privileges
-accorded to these flags by the capitulations. It seemed
-highly desirable to Midhat Pasha to put an end to this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">55</a></span>
-equivocal status of the inhabitants of Koweit, and to
-regularise their position. He accordingly entered into
-negotiations with them, and offered the full enjoyment
-of their autonomy and privileges under the government
-of their own Sheik Sabah, provided they recognised
-themselves as forming part and parcel of the Ottoman
-empire, and adopted the Ottoman flag as their national
-ensign. These conditions were accepted by the people
-of Koweit, and their territory became a sandjak of the
-vilayet of Bagdad. A formal treaty to that effect was
-drawn up and signed and confirmed by <em>berats</em> (writs of
-investiture) from Constantinople, and new schools and
-mosques arose in Koweit.</p>
-
-<p>After the settlement of Koweit, Midhat’s attention was
-turned to the conquest of the Nedjed, the most important
-event that marked his governorship of Bagdad.</p>
-
-<p>The Nedjed is the geographical denomination of an
-extent of country including about a quarter of the Arabian
-peninsula. Soliman, the conqueror, after defeating the
-Portuguese squadron in the Persian Gulf, had annexed
-it to his empire, and had despatched a special governor
-from Constantinople to administer the province of Hassa.
-A century after this, the inhabitants rose in revolt and
-formed themselves into a separate State, which included
-the island of Bahrein in its limits. On the first breaking
-out of these troubles, the Egyptian troops sent out to
-repress the revolt had been successful, and had defeated
-the rebels at Riad and Derayeh, forcing the Wahabites to
-recognise the authority of the Sultan, but the Ottoman
-Government, whose attention was now turned elsewhere,
-neglected to follow up this success, and the Nedjed
-gradually regained its independence under the dynasty
-of Wahab.</p>
-
-<p>In the time of Midhat Pasha, the reigning Sheik,
-Abdul Fazil, whilst in the enjoyment of quasi‐independ<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">56</a></span>ence
-himself, had never dreamt of encroaching on the
-neighbouring territories under the authority of the Sultan,
-nor of exciting revolt among their inhabitants by preaching
-among them the particular tenets of Wahabism;
-but his brother Saood, under the instigation of certain
-counsellors, with a view to supplanting him in the
-government of the country, declared war on him, and
-succeeded in dethroning him.</p>
-
-<p>Abdul Fazil now had recourse to the intervention
-of Midhat Pasha, whom he warned of the probable
-consequences that would follow the victory of his brother
-with respect to the propagandism of Wahabite ideas
-among the surrounding tribes. Midhat determined to
-act, but before entering on a campaign that might prove
-an arduous undertaking, he took measures to ascertain
-the exact forces that Saood had at his disposal, as well
-as the topography of the country where military operations
-would have to be carried out. With this view, spies
-and agents disguised as merchants were sent in various
-directions, and soundings were taken of different parts
-of the coast. A full report as to the situation of the
-Nedjed in all these respects was in due course furnished
-to Midhat, who in the meantime had requested and
-obtained the necessary authorisation from the Grand
-Vizier, Aali Pasha, for the projected campaign.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat was aware that certain delicate international
-questions might arise in the course of the expedition.
-The policy of England, as represented by its Indian
-Government, had always been to favour rather than to
-discourage the desire of independence on the part of
-the Arab chiefs in this part of the world. A serious
-and systematic attempt, therefore, to suppress their independence
-and to attach these distant members permanently
-to the body of the Ottoman Empire might
-seem to run counter to the policy of the Indian Govern<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">57</a></span>ment
-on the shores of the neighbouring Persian Gulf.
-Midhat had always been a stout and consistent supporter
-of the English Alliance, but he was by no means inclined
-for that reason to sacrifice to that alliance the essential
-interest of the Ottoman Empire; and while resolved to
-proceed with tact and due considerateness for the interests
-and susceptibilities of a friendly Power, he did not hesitate,
-in spite of a certain amount of sympathy manifested by
-England towards Saood, to proceed with the expedition
-he had resolved upon.</p>
-
-<p>The most populous province of Nedjed was Hassa,
-with its port Elkatif. Thirty‐two hours distant from this
-port are situated the townships of Elhofuf and Elmuberez,
-surrounded by fortified walls. Six hours distant from
-Elkatif is the port of Ras Tannurah, offering favourable
-conditions for a disembarkation of troops. Securing his
-communications between Bussora and Elkatif, a distance
-of 360 miles by sea, by means of the proffered co‐operation
-of Abdullah Elsabah, Sheik of Koweit, who put his flotilla
-at the disposal of the Pasha for that purpose, Midhat embarked
-five battalions of regular troops with a complement
-of artillery under the command of Nafiz Pasha, General
-of division, for the port of Ras Tannurah, whence they
-immediately marched to Elkatif, which after a faint resistance
-capitulated to the Ottoman troops. The surrender
-of Elmuberez and other strategical points in the Wahabs’
-country followed in quick succession, and in a very short
-space of time the partisans of Saood were dispersed and
-the whole country brought under Imperial rule.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat was now about to start himself for the Nedjed,
-with a view to organise the country as a province of
-the Ottoman Empire, when his attention was called by
-the Governor of Diarbekir, Kurd Ismail Pasha, to the
-suspicious movements in the neighbourhood of Urfa of
-Sheik Abdul Kerim, of the tribe of Chamar, the same, it<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">58</a></span>
-will be remembered, who, on the occasion of the revolt
-of the Dogara tribesmen, arriving too late to assist the
-defeated rebels, turned round and offered his services to
-the victorious Pasha.</p>
-
-<p>Thinking the present occasion more favourable for
-carrying out his cherished policy, he was marching straight
-on Bagdad, killing and pillaging on his route. Warned
-by Kurd Ismail, Midhat took immediate steps to crush
-him. Abdul Kerim had divided his forces into three
-parts, the first advancing on Zor, the second on Mosul,
-and the third, under his own command, marching on
-Bagdad. On this information reaching him, Midhat
-ordered two battalions of regulars to reinforce Kurd
-Ismail, whilst General Echeref Pasha was directed to
-fortify Zor and other strategical points on the Tigris
-and Euphrates. These troops coming into collision with
-the first division of Abdul Kerim’s army in the neighbourhood
-of Zor, easily dispersed them, whilst Kurd Ismail
-himself, attacking the second division of the rebels in the
-neighbourhood of Mosul, completely routed it. On
-learning of the successive defeats of the two wings of
-this invading army, Abdul Kerim quickly abandoned all
-idea of advancing, and took measures to secure his own
-safety. His retreat by the desert being cut off by the
-droughts prevailing at this season, he made for his own
-native country, the Chamar, but Midhat threatening Sheik
-Ibn Reshid, chief of the tribe Djebel, if he ventured to
-offer refuge to the rebel, diverted Abdul Kerim’s retreat
-to the direction of Muntefik by Hilah and Kerbela, where
-he fell in with Nassir Pasha, and in the fight that ensued
-was wounded and taken prisoner. After a regular trial for
-armed rebellion and treachery, he was condemned to death,
-and the sentence being approved of by the authorities at
-Constantinople, he was in due course hanged at Mosul.
-His brother, Ferhan Pasha, now received the chieftainship<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">59</a></span>
-of the tribe Chamar, with an increase of territory and a
-regular monthly subsidy, whilst the turbulent tribesmen
-acknowledged the authority of the Imperial Government
-and consented to pay the taxes. This settlement was
-followed by a resumption of agricultural pursuits on the
-part of the inhabitants, and the general pacification of the
-country.</p>
-
-<p>But troubles in these parts did not end with the
-conquest of the Nedjed and the defeat of Abdul Kerim.
-Abdullah Fazil&mdash;who had by means of Ottoman arms
-been restored to the government of Elkatif, with the
-Turkish title of Mutessarif, in the new vilayet of Nedjed&mdash;once
-freed from all apprehension respecting the ambition
-of his brother Saood, began to manifest restlessness under
-Turkish regular administration. Discontent, too, with
-Turkish fiscal arrangements was felt by the tribesmen,
-and affairs began again to assume a threatening aspect.
-Midhat determined to inquire into the causes of this
-discontent, and finding that exemption from all taxation,
-save that sanctioned by the Mussulman law, viz. the tithe,
-had been consecrated by secular usage among them, and
-that the neighbouring tribes who had come under English
-protection, Oman, Mascat, etc., fully enjoyed the privilege
-of this exemption, determined to satisfy the population
-of Elkatif in this respect, and forthwith consented to limit
-their liability to taxation to the regular payment of the
-tithe.</p>
-
-<p>There remained the island of Bahrein, the conquest
-of which, on account of the importance of its position on
-the Persian Gulf, Midhat now determined to effect. In
-order to superintend operations himself, and in case of
-any international friction demanding his presence, Midhat
-started for the Nedjed. Abdullah Fazil hearing of this,
-and fearing that his own equivocal conduct was the cause
-of the journey, fled from Elkatif to Riad, and in spite of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">60</a></span>
-the Pasha’s assurances, refused to return. His dismissal
-from the Government was thereupon pronounced, and the
-district converted into the sandjak of Hassa, and together
-with the command of the troops, was entrusted to Nafiz
-Pasha. A friendly interchange of views now took place
-between Midhat Pasha and the Government of India, the
-result of which was that the island of Bahrein was officially
-annexed to the Mutessarifat of Hassa. Two Turkish
-corvettes, the <em>Libnan</em> and the <em>Iskenderoun</em>, under the
-command of Arif Bey, sailed for the island, followed
-by two English gunboats under Commander Pelly, and
-the Turkish and English vessels exchanged salutes and
-other friendly courtesies in the port. When the Turkish
-sailors disembarked on the island they were received with
-the most indescribable enthusiasm by the islanders, who
-had not seen the Turkish ensign flying on a man‐of‐war
-for two centuries past. The Sheik of the island offered
-an appropriate piece of land to be used as a <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">dépôt</i> for
-coals for Turkish vessels, and offered to place the resources
-of the island at the disposition of the Turkish authorities
-if necessity should arise. On weighing anchor from
-Bahrein the two corvettes were joined by the vessel that
-had Midhat Pasha on board, and the little flotilla sailed
-together to Koweit. Here the same scenes were enacted
-that had distinguished the visit to Bahrein, and nothing
-occurred to mar the cordiality that existed between the
-Ottoman and British forces that met in these Eastern
-ports. The convention which had been previously agreed
-upon between Midhat and the British authorities prevented
-any friction between them.</p>
-
-<p>The re‐establishment of Imperial authority in these
-regions justified, and indeed necessitated, a considerable
-increase in the Turkish flotilla in these waters. Before the
-opening of the Suez Canal, Turkey only possessed the
-two corvettes the <em>Boursa</em>, and the <em>Ismir</em>, neither of which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">61</a></span>
-was in a sea‐going condition. Midhat sent the <em>Boursa</em>
-to Bombay to undergo repairs, and added the <em>Libnan</em>,
-<em>Iskenderoun</em>, <em>Deniz</em>, <em>Babel</em>, <em>Ninova</em>, <em>Nedjed</em>, and <em>Assour</em>,
-besides ten vessels of light draught for river police,
-and to reinforce the Bagdad squadron. The port of
-Bussora, no longer adequate to the naval requirements
-of the province, was enlarged and improved, and works
-for an inner harbour capable of anchoring vessels of 10‐feet
-draught were commenced at Kut‐el‐Frenghi on the
-river Shat‐el‐arab.</p>
-
-<p>All these various improvements and reforms, and the
-general advance in the political and administrative status
-of this important province, were highly appreciated by
-the Government of the Porte, which was now under the
-enlightened guidance of Aali Pasha, who addressed the
-following letter to Midhat Pasha:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Excellency</span>,&mdash;The very weak state of health from
-which I have been for some time suffering has been the
-cause of the delay that has occurred in answering your
-letters concerning the voyage of His Majesty the Shah.
-Pray accept my most sincere excuses. I beg to congratulate
-you in a very especial manner, on your brilliant
-successes in the Nedjed. Everything seems to indicate
-that, thanks to the tact with which you have brought
-about the pacification of the Provinces of Assir, the political
-importance of which is so considerable, the whole Arabic
-peninsula will soon return to its ancient status. By your
-services you have merited the glorious title, ‘Haremein
-Muhteremein.’</p>
-
-<p>“The effect of the Shah’s visit on the Shiite population
-in the province was the subject of considerable preoccupation
-with us, but the good intentions and loyalty
-manifested on both sides, have smoothed over many
-difficulties and brought about highly desirable results....
-It is quite certain that Nevab Ikbal Eldevle, being a
-just and upright man, will blame and discourage any
-flagrant departure from justice and equity on the part of
-his co‐religionists.</p>
-
-<p>“Be good enough to thank him in my name, when the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">62</a></span>occasion offers, for the seal in agate, the engraving and
-inscription on which are very fine.</p>
-
-<p>“Prince Abbas Mirza has arrived here, and he has
-twice been received in Audience by his Majesty.... He
-seems a polished and intelligent person, but I have not yet
-had any opportunity to form an estimate of his character.</p>
-
-<p>“I am,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr1">“(seal) <span class="smcap">Mehmed Emin Aali</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“23 <i>Djemaziel Evel, 1288</i> (1871), <i>Hegira</i>.”</small></p></div>
-
-<p>By the same courtier the Sultan Abdul Aziz sent
-Midhat Pasha a sword of honour set with diamonds, with
-the inscription “Nedjed” engraved on it. This was the
-closing scene of Midhat’s governorship of Bagdad, and
-with it closed the first half of his career, viz., as Provincial
-Governor. Circumstances were occurring at Constantinople
-destined to bring him on the scene there, to play
-his part in the important political events about to occur in
-the metropolis.</p>
-
-<p>But a change of a portentous nature had taken place
-at Constantinople. Fuad Pasha and Aali Pasha, whose
-prestige and popularity had gained an ascendancy over
-the Sultan, and had, since his accession, practically monopolised
-power, and who had strenuously supported Midhat
-in all his reforming measures both on the Danube and the
-Euphrates, died within a few months of each other. The
-disappearance of these two able and powerful Ministers
-synchronized with the return of Abdul Aziz from a tour
-in Europe, when symptoms of an ominous character began
-to reveal themselves in the sovereign. He showed himself
-impatient of contradiction or advice of any kind, expressing
-openly his relief at being freed from the incubus of
-his former Grand Viziers; he completely changed the etiquette
-of the Court, imposing on the occasion of audiences
-an antiquated ceremonial, accompanied by unwonted prostrations
-to be observed on entering the Imperial presence,
-and he directed that henceforth he should be addressed in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">63</a></span>
-inflated language, strange even to the forms of Oriental
-adulation. But what was more serious than these triflings
-of Imperial vanity, was the fact that he now launched out,
-careless of the resources of the budget, on the most
-lavish expenditure of every kind both of a public and
-private nature. Fleets of costly ironclads were ordered
-and equipped without regard to their cost; marble palaces
-rose, as by enchantment, on the banks of the Bosphorus,
-and every whim and caprice on his own part or that of the
-Palace had to be gratified without stint or delay. He
-found in Mahmoud Nedim a compliant Grand Vizier, who,
-in return for the retention of power, undertook to find the
-ways and means for the gratification of all his master’s
-wishes.</p>
-
-<p>The reflex action of this state of things at headquarters
-was felt in the most distant provinces. When
-the exactions of the Palace had expropriated the balance
-of the sums destined to the various services of the State,
-recourse was had to the provinces to make good the
-deficiencies by extraordinary “benevolences” and remittances.
-Works of public utility or necessity were
-accordingly suspended, and the funds necessary for their
-completion diverted to the metropolis. Incompetent
-favourites arrived from Constantinople with orders to
-the Vali to provide them with lucrative posts, and by
-these means the whole fabric of the new administration,
-painfully and patiently built up, was dislocated and
-deranged. Midhat, recognising the impossibility of governing
-in such conditions, resigned his Governorship and set
-out for Constantinople.</p>
-
-<h3>THE FIRST GRAND VIZIERATE OF MIDHAT PASHA.</h3>
-
-<p>On his arrival in Constantinople, Midhat found that an
-order had been issued for his banishment from the capital,
-under cloak of nominating him to the government of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">64</a></span>
-Adrianople. Insisting, however, on the exercise of his
-right of audience with the sovereign before setting out for
-his new post, he made such strong representations to the
-Sultan with respect to the general situation of the empire,
-that Abdul Aziz thereupon abruptly dismissed Mahmoud
-Nedim, and appointed Midhat Grand Vizier in his place
-(1873).</p>
-
-<p>As soon as he had filled the principal offices of State
-with the best material he could find&mdash;Chirvani Rushdi
-Pasha, Djémil Pasha, and Sadik Pasha&mdash;the first and
-most pressing necessity that confronted him was to
-endeavour to put the Finances in order. This was no
-easy task. The public accounts presented were entirely
-fictitious. His first discovery was to the effect that whereas
-the budget showed a surplus of half a million (£T),
-there was in point of fact a deficit of three millions. The
-actual appropriation of the sums debited in the accounts
-presented another difficulty. A sum of £T100,000 disbursed
-by the Treasury was not accounted for at
-all. Midhat insisted on a full inquiry, and, discovering
-that this sum had been appropriated by the late Grand
-Vizier, directed an investigation into the matter before the
-members of the Council of State, who ordered its immediate
-restitution by Mahmoud Nedim, and recommended
-his banishment. He, however, alleging in private that this
-sum in question although nominally attributed to him was
-really allotted to the Palace, found in the Valide Sultan
-and her <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">entourage</i> most powerful allies in his duel with
-Midhat. Banished by the insistence of the Grand Vizier,
-first to Adrianople and then to Trebizond, he soon
-obtained permission to return to Constantinople.</p>
-
-<p>Two distinct parties began now to stand out in clear
-relief. On the one side was Midhat, warmly supported by
-public opinion in the capital and in the provinces, and by all
-that was most enlightened among the Softas and Ulemas,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">65</a></span>
-headed by Chakir Effendi, and on the other side the whole
-army of corruption, headed by Mahmoud Nedim and
-protected by the Valide Sultan and the Palace Camarilla.
-Another powerful ally of the late Grand Vizier was
-General Ignatieff, who by the most ingenious and persistent
-methods&mdash;condescending even to the resources of
-the stage&mdash;worked on the mind of the Sultan in order
-to restore Mahmoud Nedim to power.</p>
-
-<p>An incident soon occurred which brought matters to
-a crisis. The Khedive of Egypt, desirous of changing
-the order of succession in his family and of obtaining
-various privileges and prerogatives from his suzerain, was
-in the habit of making periodical visits to Constantinople,
-carrying away with him each time, by judicious payments,
-some shred of the sovereign rights of the Porte. These
-visits became a regular source of income and emolument
-to the Palace and all its myrmidons. Arriving at
-Constantinople on the occasion of one of these visits
-he found Midhat Pasha installed as Grand Vizier, and
-to his surprise and disappointment, and to the discomfiture
-of the Palace clique, he was obliged this time
-to return to Alexandria with his presents, <em>re infectâ</em>.</p>
-
-<p>It soon became apparent that one of two things must
-happen: the Sultan would either have to change the
-whole <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">régime</i> and scale of expenditure of the Palace,
-or change his Grand Vizier; and as he never really
-contemplated the former course, he adopted the latter.
-The determining cause was Midhat’s action with reference
-to certain scandals&mdash;incidents connected with Baron
-Hirsch’s railway schemes.</p>
-
-<p>It is only in a despotic country, where State contracts
-are signed in the dark, and <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">cahiers de charge</i> are examined
-by carefully chosen experts and passed by complaisant
-accountants, that such a scandal as the Hirsch railways
-is possible or conceivable. If the cynicism of the whole<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">66</a></span>
-transaction had not become notorious, and thus excited
-as much laughter as its nefariousness caused indignation,
-it would be worth while to set out in detail all the
-circumstances of this stupendous business.</p>
-
-<p>To obtain a contract giving unlimited control over
-the richest forests in the world, on the pretext of cutting
-sleepers, is in itself a pretty smart stroke of business.
-To stipulate for payment of railways according to the
-mileage executed, irrespective of topographical considerations
-or local requirements, is a triumph of
-contracting skill; but to claim payment for work
-done in the plains only, on the basis of an average
-calculated for working through plains and mountain‐chains
-alike, is the very glory of financial genius. The
-secret, too, of the art was as simple as the result was
-lucrative. Backsheesh in adequate amounts, distributed
-at appropriate moments in the right quarters, was the
-alpha and omega of the business.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat, in his determination to strike at the root of
-the whole system of corruption, irrespective of persons
-or of consequences, having discovered that the highest
-person in the land was himself a recipient of the largesses
-of the Austrian baron, insisted on the restitution of the
-sums received. The Sultan listened to the advice
-tendered, returned the money, and dismissed his Grand
-Vizier.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">67</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER III<br /><br />
-
-<small>DEPOSITION AND DEATH OF ABDUL AZIZ</small></h2>
-
-<p><span class="smcap">After</span> an honourable exile as Governor of Salonica,
-Midhat obtained leave to return to Constantinople, and
-after a brief tenure of the office of Minister of Justice and
-of the Presidency of the Council of State, he handed in
-his resignation in the following terms, and retired to his
-Konak in the neighbourhood of the capital and awaited
-developments:</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><em>To Midhat Pasha, President of the Council of State.</em></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“I beg that your Highness will be good enough to
-instruct me as to the reply I am to make to His Majesty,
-in case he should question me as to the motives for
-your resignation.</p>
-
-<p class="right padr5">“<span class="smcap">Hafiz Mehemed</span></p>
-
-<p class="right padr1 f09">“<i>Head Chamberlain</i> (<i>of Sultan Aziz</i>).”</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Reply.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“Excellency,&mdash;My request is not based upon any
-personal motives. I have nothing but praise for all my
-colleagues, both high and low; but the motives which
-have forced me to this decision are, as I have already
-set out in my petition, the difficulties of the position
-in which we are placed, that is to say, our finances are
-in a hopeless condition, the civil administration is utterly
-disorganised, and the state of the army is beyond
-description; all this compromised the security and
-credit of the country, and the non‐Mussulman element
-loudly proclaims the intention that it long ago formed
-of placing itself under foreign protection. While the
-faults and mistakes made twenty years ago have prepared
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">68</a></span>the way for the disasters which are now showing themselves
-in rapid succession, and which are sufficient to
-employ all our time, our foreign policy has also been
-misdirected, the feelings of the Powers have changed
-towards us, and they entertain hostile intentions towards
-our country to such a degree that the most friendly Power
-has lost all confidence in us. It is impossible for us not
-to deplore the unfortunate results which this line of
-conduct cannot fail to produce for Turkey, and for the
-faithful servants of His Majesty&mdash;that of being unable
-to see the future clearly before them. In view of the
-attitude adopted by His Highness the Grand Vizier,
-which gives reason to hope that this state of affairs may
-be remedied, I feel compelled to devote my feeble efforts
-and support to those duties which are specially incumbent
-on me in the existing crisis through which the Ministry
-is passing. But as I have explained in the petition which
-I have already sent in, I have passed the greater portion
-of my life in provincial service, and have never taken part
-in such delicate and complicated affairs, and am therefore
-compelled to ask you to have the goodness to intercede
-with His Majesty to accept my resignation.</p>
-
-<p class="center2">“I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“29 <i>Cheval</i>, 1291 (1874).”</small></p></div>
-
-<p>In the meantime things went from bad to worse in the
-affairs of the State. Grand Viziers one after the other
-were appointed and dismissed. Mehemet Rushdi Pasha,
-Essad Pasha, Chervani Rushdi Pasha, held office for a few
-months only, and with the best of intentions were utterly
-unable to grapple with the situation, and the “villain of
-the piece,” Mahmoud Nedim, was at last recalled to office.
-The finances of the country were fast getting beyond all
-remedy. Although it was only twenty years since the
-fatal secret of a national debt had been learnt in Turkey,
-bankruptcy was already staring the country in the face.
-So palpable was this to the best friends of Turkey, that
-Mr Yorke in the British Parliament, in the interests of a
-long‐standing ally of Great Britain, and of the alliance
-itself, called attention to the state of Turkish finances, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">69</a></span>
-summoned the British Government to intervene through
-its ambassador at Constantinople to endeavour to ward
-off impending catastrophes. Three months after this
-warning the Turkish Treasury suspended payment on
-half the amount of the coupons of the public debt.</p>
-
-<p>The outcry caused by this measure throughout Europe,
-not only in strictly commercial and financial circles, but
-in every class of the community, was indescribable.
-Tempted by the high rate of interest, and confiding in the
-assurances of financiers interested in floating successive
-loans that “Turkey always has paid and therefore
-always would pay” the coupons of its debts, the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">petite
-bourgeoisie</i> and the small investor had largely placed their
-savings in Turkish bonds, and the “tightness” and misery
-caused by the suspension was undoubtedly very great
-(1875). Meetings of indignant bond‐holders were held in
-every capital and large city in Europe, and the Turkish
-Government and the Turkish nation, the Pasha and the
-people, were confounded in a common anathema. The
-ground was admirably prepared for an explosion of
-political passion directed against Turkey. The occasion
-for this was not long in presenting itself.</p>
-
-<p>During the second Vizierate of Essad Pasha, certain
-movements of a suspicious nature took place on the
-Montenegrin frontier which would have arrested the attention
-of a more vigilant Government. A party of sixty Slav
-peasants from the village of Nevesinje in the Commune
-of Mostar, on some trivial quarrel with the local authorities,
-emigrated in a body across the frontier into Montenegro.
-In a short time, through the good offices of the Russian
-Ambassador, they obtained leave to return to their homes;
-but very soon, in concert with their Montenegrin friends,
-they organised a <em>razzia</em> on the lands of the neighbouring
-Mussulmans. Instead of nipping this incipient rebellion in
-the bud and enquiring into its cause, the local authorities<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">70</a></span>
-temporised with its leaders and awaited instructions from
-Constantinople as to how they were to proceed. Encouraged
-by this impunity, and with the assurance of
-external support, the insurgent bands rapidly increased in
-numbers, and when at last the Government determined to
-act, it found itself in presence of a serious rebellion. Essad
-Pasha, well‐intentioned but weak, and preoccupied with
-the serious outlook of affairs generally, accepted the
-insidious offer of the Russian and Austrian Ambassadors
-to intervene between the leaders of the bands and the
-Supreme Government. No policy could have been more
-fatal. It afforded the greatest possible encouragement to
-the rebels, who considered the step an acknowledgment
-by the Government of its own inability to deal with
-the movement; it practically conceded belligerent rights
-to the rebels, and it encouraged the habit and consecrated
-the principle of interference by foreign governments in the
-internal affairs of the empire.</p>
-
-<p>The hollowness of the offer was apparent the moment
-the terms of surrender came to be discussed, and the net
-result of this diplomatic comedy was, as was no doubt
-intended, that what was at first an insignificant rising
-of a handful of peasants was raised to the dignity of a
-recognised rebellion that could negotiate on equal terms
-with the Imperial Government through the medium of
-foreign consuls and ambassadors.</p>
-
-<p>Mahmoud Nedim had now succeeded Essad Pasha as
-Grand Vizier (1875), and as no effective measures were
-taken to suppress the rising, it went on spreading from
-village to village and district to district till the contagion
-was caught in Bulgaria. There, in the beginning of 1874,
-a commencement of unrest showed itself in the districts of
-Drenova, Kazanlik, and Zagra; but the local authorities
-(warned by what had taken place in the Herzegovina
-through the neglect of initial precautions) had all the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">71</a></span>
-leaders of the movement arrested. Thereupon General
-Ignatieff made such energetic representations to the
-Porte, that orders arrived not only for the release of the
-imprisoned malcontents, but for the dismissal of all the
-functionaries concerned in their arrest.<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">6</a></p>
-
-<p>The effect of this novel and original mode of dealing
-with an insurrection was soon apparent in the effervescence
-and excitement it caused among the Mussulman population
-throughout the province. They saw rebel bands, the
-leaders of which were patronised and supported by foreign
-consuls and diplomatists, being organised without disguise
-and approaching their own hearths, whereas all defensive
-measures on the part of their own natural leaders
-were discountenanced and punished. They thereupon
-resolved to take the matter into their own hands, and
-formed vigilance committees and organised local bands
-under the command of retired <em>zaptiés</em> throughout the
-province.</p>
-
-<p>In such psychological conditions an explosion of
-popular passions was certain sooner or later to take place.
-The occasion for this was furnished by an incident that
-occurred at Salonica on the 5th May 1875. This incident
-was, with the Bulgarian insurrection and the Berlin Note,
-one of the external difficulties that confronted the Govern<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">72</a></span>ment,
-and placed it in a very critical position. A young
-Bulgarian girl had come by rail to Salonica from a neighbouring
-village on the evening of the 5th May, accompanied
-by a <em>hoadja</em>, with a view to making a declaration of
-conversion to Mahomedanism before the Grand Council of
-Salonica&mdash;a formality required by the law, as a preliminary
-to her being married to a young Mahomedan of her village.
-On her arrival at the station she was met by a mob of
-Greeks and Bulgarians who pulled off her <em>yashmak</em> and
-<em>feradje</em> (mantle and veil), and forcing her into a carriage,
-in spite of the efforts of four <em>zaptiés</em> who came up in the
-middle of the disturbance, drove her at a gallop to the
-American Consulate, where the brother of the Vice‐Consul
-(a Bulgarian), who had arranged the abduction, concealed
-her during the night. The next day he had her removed
-to the house of a friend, so that all trace of the girl should
-be lost. But early next morning a Mussulman mob, comprising
-(as in such occurrences is certain to be the case) the
-worst and most violent sections of the population, had
-assembled at the Konak and loudly demanded the restoration
-of the girl and her appearance before the Grand
-Council. As their demands were not complied with, they
-retired to the Saatli Mosque, adjacent to the Governor’s
-Konak, where they reiterated their demands for the restoration
-of the girl. Unfortunately, by some fatality which
-was never satisfactorily explained, the German and French
-Consuls found their way into the mosque in the very midst
-of excited Mussulmans. Whether they went there of their
-own accord to remonstrate and argue with the people, or
-approaching the scene of the demonstration were hustled
-into the mosque, was never cleared up. But once they
-appeared there, the frenzy of the mob burst all bounds,
-and the most violent amongst them, pursuing the Consuls
-into one of the apartments of the <em>Muderris</em> (Academy) in
-connection with the mosque, fell on them with iron bars<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">73</a></span>
-hastily snatched from the windows of the mosque, and
-murdered them on the spot. The English Consul, Mr
-Blunt, accompanied by his <em>cavass</em>, seems to have been
-the only one who kept his head on this occasion
-and acted with presence of mind and sagacity; for, at
-the risk of his own life, he forced his way to the Konak,
-and when he found that the Governor could not effect the
-restoration of the girl, which was the only way to calm the
-mob and rescue the Consuls, he sent to the American Vice‐Consulate
-to apprize Mr Lazaro, who was the cause of the
-whole disturbance, of the perilous situation of his colleagues,
-the French and German Consuls, and to implore him to
-restore the girl. Unfortunately, Mr Lazaro at first procrastinated
-and pretended that he did not know where the
-girl was, and so precious time was lost; and when subsequently,
-on a further appeal from Mr Consul Blunt, he
-delivered up the girl, it was too late, for the crime
-against the foreign Consuls who had intervened had been
-accomplished.</p>
-
-<p>Although the Ottoman Government took immediate
-steps to punish the authors of this crime&mdash;the six principal
-leaders of which were immediately executed, and the
-remainder punished with severe terms of penal servitude&mdash;the
-effect of the outrage on the public opinion of Europe,
-in the existing state of feeling in regard to Turkey,
-can easily be conceived. It excited indignation everywhere;
-but the anti‐Turkish Press, now pretty numerous,
-seized on it with avidity and pointed to it as irrefragable
-evidence of the incorrigible fanaticism of the whole Mussulman
-population of the empire, and called for various
-coercive measures, amounting in some cases to a combined
-crusade, to protect the Christians in the country, now
-threatened with wholesale massacre.<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor">7</a></p>
-
-<p>It was in vain that Europeans who had lived all their
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">74</a></span>lives in the country, and were acquainted from personal
-experience with the feelings and opinions of the inhabitants,
-protested against these exaggerations and deprecated
-their vain terrors. Colonel James Baker, an English resident
-for twenty years in the neighbourhood of Salonica, where
-he had been farming on a large scale, and whose occupation
-had brought him in contact with all sorts and conditions
-of men, Christian and Mahomedan alike, wrote a book
-ridiculing these apprehensions, and communicating his
-experiences of the harmony and good fellowship existing
-among the adherents of both religions, with whom he had
-for twenty years been brought into contact.</p>
-
-<p>But the experience of people living on the spot could
-not stem the torrent of hostile prejudice fortified by such
-dramatic examples as the murder of the Consuls at
-Salonica. General Ignatieff, whose plans were being
-admirably served by events, was not slow in lending the
-weight of his authority to the propagation of these
-imaginary terrors. He embodied 300 Montenegrin workmen
-at Constantinople to serve as a body‐guard of his
-Embassy, to the amusement of his more sensible colleagues,
-who were quite aware of the baselessness of the fears that
-were the pretext of these ostentatious precautions. But the
-<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">mise en scène</i> contrived by the ingenious ambassador was
-not the less effective, and these picturesque mountaineers
-as they lounged about the streets of Pera, in their handsome
-national costume, bristling with multifarious arms
-in their embroidered sashes, were striking advertisements
-of the terrible dangers that threatened all Christians in the
-fanatical land of the Osmanli.</p>
-
-<p>Servia, too, was preparing to enter the lists. Although
-without the shred of a grievance against the suzerain
-Power, nor indeed alleging any, Prince Milan, moved
-by the sole ambition to convert his principality into a
-kingdom, had easily allowed himself to be drawn into the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">75</a></span>
-conspiracy of a concerted attack on the Ottoman Empire.
-All the reserves of his army were called out and armed
-with newly imported rifles; and trains full of Russian
-officers of all grades and ranks, from Generals of divisions
-to corporals and sergeants, arrived daily at the capital to
-organise this militia into a fighting machine, and to drill
-the raw peasants into soldiers. The whole country, in fact,
-from Belgrade to Alexinatz, was an armed camp.</p>
-
-<p>Everything portended important developments for the
-ensuing spring (1875). Early in the year, information
-reached the Porte that a serious outbreak would take place
-in Bulgaria in the month of April, and that the districts
-of Philippopolis, Eski‐Zagra, and Tirnova would be the
-scene of the explosion. The information which was very
-detailed and supported by evidence as to its accuracy, was
-accompanied by an earnest request by the authorities of the
-threatened districts that a body of regular troops should
-be despatched to the spot to inspire confidence in the
-inhabitants and to protect the lives and property of peaceful
-citizens. General Ignatieff again interfered, and in the
-capacity of <em>amicus curiæ</em>, insisted that the presence of
-regular troops would only inflame the passions of the
-population and precipitate a crisis. Mahmoud Nedim
-allowed himself to be persuaded by the Russian
-Ambassador, and persisted in turning a deaf ear to the
-reiterated requests of the local authorities for the despatch
-of a regular force.</p>
-
-<p>Three weeks before the appointed day (16th April
-1875) the anticipated rising took place. It was accompanied
-by exactly the same incidents that had characterised
-every previous rising that obeyed a <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">mot d’ordre</i>
-from outside. The armed bands fell on the first
-Mussulmans they met with, and massacred them all,
-regardless of age or sex, with the obvious aim of provoking
-reprisals that should play into the hands of the enemies of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">76</a></span>
-Turkey.<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">8</a> These reprisals did, in fact, take place, and were,
-no doubt, of a sanguinary and wholesale character. It is not
-intended here to defend or condemn the atrocities that
-took place on this occasion; but human nature being what
-it is, and the provocation endured by the Mussulman
-population being taken into account, and due allowance
-being made for the contagion of passion and panic, it is no
-great wonder if scenes were enacted in Bulgaria that
-have marked revolution and <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">jacqueries</i> in all ages in
-every part of the world; and perhaps still less if a confessedly
-and bitterly hostile Press in Europe denounced
-“methods of barbarism” with little sifting of evidence
-and with much dramatic exaggeration. Party spirit has
-occasionally not scrupled to apply exactly the same terms
-without much reason to the methods of warfare of its own
-regular troops. One fact was clearly and conclusively
-established by the various commissions subsequently sent
-to prosecute enquiries on the spot, viz., that not a single
-instance occurred of an unarmed Christian being injured,
-or of a Christian village being destroyed whose inhabitants
-had not actually risen in armed rebellion. Fanaticism, in
-the strict acceptation of the term, is not so discriminating.</p>
-
-<p>Matters had now come to such a pass that a general
-cataclysm was to be apprehended. Bulgaria, Montenegro
-and Herzegovina in flames, Servia arming to the
-teeth under the supervision of competent foreign officers,
-Roumania preparing to move in the same direction,
-a bankrupt treasury at home, a Grand Vizier whose
-sole resource seemed to be in the promises and counsels
-of a perfidious ambassador, the arch‐enemy of his country,
-and a sovereign wholly unconscious, or careless, of the
-condition of the empire, provided his own extravagant
-caprices were gratified&mdash;such was the aspect of affairs
-in Turkey in the spring of 1876. But that was not all.</p>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">77</a></span></p>
-<p>Under the spur of public opinion, and moved by secret
-springs in the same direction, European diplomacy was
-meddling with the matter. Rulers of State and masters
-of many legions were holding meetings to discuss the
-situation in the East, and “Notes” and “Memorandums”
-were flying about the Chancellories of Europe. The
-diplomatic outlook was quite as menacing as the situation
-at home was critical.</p>
-
-<p>It was in such a condition of affairs that counsel
-was being taken in Midhat’s Konak, among a few patriots
-who did not yet despair of their country, as to the best
-mode of saving the empire. But before the events that
-led up to the deposition of the Sultan Abdul Aziz are
-detailed, it will be useful to cast a glance at what was
-passing in the diplomatic world in Europe.</p>
-
-<p>The first and most important event in this respect,
-inasmuch as it was the key of all that subsequently
-occurred, was the meeting of the Czar and the Emperor
-of Austria at Reichstadt, 8th July 1876.<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">9</a></p>
-
-<p>The outcome of that interview, with respect to Turkey,
-is no secret to‐day, but twenty‐five years ago it was
-certainly ignored in London, otherwise the negotiations
-that took place between the English and Austrian Governments
-relative to the contingency of an armed intervention
-in the Turko‐Russian War&mdash;carried on through the
-Austrian Embassy in London in the significant absence
-of the Ambassador, which went so far as to discuss the
-terms of a guaranteed war loan&mdash;would certainly not
-have occurred. The acumen of the English Government
-on this occasion would seem to have been somewhat
-at fault, and the information that came to it from Vienna
-strangely unreliable; for it acted, throughout negotiations
-extending over two years, in undisturbed reliance on
-the <em>bonâ fides</em> of the Austrian Chancellor’s assurances,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">78</a></span>and apparently in a secure trust in the force of his Magyar
-prejudices with respect to Russia. The fact is patent
-to‐day&mdash;and was well known at Berlin, and was not ignored
-in Paris&mdash;that Austria was, if not the actual instigator of
-the Herzegovinian rising&mdash;which is by no means certain&mdash;the
-Power that was determined to profit by it, and that
-her whole policy and diplomatic action with respect to
-the events that were taking place in the South‐East of
-Europe was governed by this determination.</p>
-
-<p>The turning‐point of Austrian policy with respect
-to Turkey has already been indicated: the abandonment
-by England of Austria’s interests on the Danube left
-her free, or even compelled her to have regard to what
-she considered her own exclusive interests; and the
-meeting of the two Emperors, at the breaking out of
-the Herzegovinian disturbances, was the confirmation
-of this change of policy.</p>
-
-<p>Two assurances seem to have been given by the
-Czar at this now historic interview. First, that whatever
-might be the outcome of events in Turkey, he would not
-seek for Russia any territorial aggrandisement in Europe;
-and secondly, with regard to Bosnia and Herzegovina, that
-in the contingency of the continuance of disturbances there
-he would not oppose the occupation of those provinces by
-Austria if sanctioned by the rest of Europe.</p>
-
-<p>If this agreement had not been a secret one, and
-the terms of it had been known or suspected in London,
-does any one imagine that events would have followed
-the course they did, or that the “Notes” and “Memorandums”
-coming from Vienna and Berlin would have
-been taken seriously by the English Cabinet? The
-pact between the two Emperors, sealed at Reichstadt,
-was quite as much at the expense of England in Asia
-as of Turkey in Europe. It was a practical corollary
-of Prince Bismarck’s avowed Eastern policy.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">79</a></span></p>
-
-<p>There is only an academical interest now in pointing
-out the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">rôle</i> that the personality of Count Andrassy and
-his reputed Magyar sentiments played in all these transactions,
-and it is not necessary to interrupt the course of
-this narrative by dwelling on them.</p>
-
-<p>After the Andrassy Memorandum had prepared the
-Cabinets of Europe for some sort of diplomatic interference
-in the affairs of Turkey, and familiarised them with the
-idea, the natural course of events in the Turkish Empire
-did the rest. The ball set going at Vienna was taken
-up at Berlin. The comparatively colourless diplomatic
-Memorandum concocted in the first‐named capital was
-followed by a far more coercive Note emanating from
-the latter. The former contained recommendations, the
-latter added external sanctions to them. The policy
-intended to be pursued with reference to Turkey was
-contained in germ in this remarkable “Note,” and the
-diplomatic strategy to be employed was herein clearly
-revealed. The “Conference,” which was to impose the
-conditions and insist on the sanction, was already on
-the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">tapis</i>, and formed the subject of an interchange of
-views between the various European governments; and it
-was, as it were, under the shadow of this menace to the
-integrity and independence of the country that the
-friends of Midhat now hastened their deliberations.</p>
-
-<p>As early as the winter of 1875, Midhat, with a view
-of profiting by the lights, and seeking the advice of the
-eminent diplomatist who represented the Court of St James
-at Constantinople, paid a visit to Sir Henry Elliot, the
-purpose of which can best be described in the words of
-the Ambassador himself.<a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">10</a></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“In the beginning of December 1875, I was informed
-by one of Midhat’s partisans, a Pasha who had filled some
-of the highest offices of the State, that the object of his
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">80</a></span>party was to obtain a ‘Constitution.’ This was more than
-a year before its promulgation, when it was declared to
-have been invented only to defeat the Conference then
-sitting at Constantinople.... A few days later Midhat
-himself called upon me and explained his views more
-fully than he had ever done before, though I was
-acquainted with their general tenor. The Empire, he
-said, was being rapidly brought to destruction; corruption
-had reached a pitch that it had never before attained;
-the service of the State was starved, while untold millions
-were poured into the Palace, and the provinces were
-being ruined by the uncontrolled exertions of governors
-who purchased their appointments at the Palace, and
-nothing could save the country but a complete change of
-system. The only remedy that he could perceive, lay,
-first, in securing a control over the sovereign by making
-the Ministers&mdash;and especially as regarded the finances&mdash;responsible
-to a national popular Assembly; and secondly
-in making this Assembly truly national, by doing away
-with all distinctions of classes and religions, and by
-placing the Christians on a footing of entire equality with
-the Mussulmans; thirdly, by decentralisation and by the
-establishment of provincial control over the governors.
-It must surely be admitted that these were enlightened
-and statesmanlike views, deserving of every encouragement....
-He dwelt repeatedly on the value that the
-sympathy of the British nation would be to the reformers,
-and on the manner in which his countrymen were now
-looking to England as the example they hoped to follow.
-I told him in reply that I could not doubt that measures
-framed upon the lines he had laid down must command
-the approval and ensure the good wishes of every
-Englishman who, like myself, had faith in the advantages
-of constitutional checks upon arbitrary power. I gave
-him this assurance confidently and in good faith; for
-certainly the very last thing that I anticipated was that
-those who in this country make the greatest parade of
-their devotion to constitutional principles would be the
-first to heap contumely upon men who were trying to
-introduce it into theirs, and to hold up their proposals to
-ridicule....”</p></div>
-
-<p>The first of the many incidents that soon after this
-conversation began to follow each other closely, took<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">81</a></span>
-place on the 10th May 1876, when an assemblage of
-several thousand Softas stopped Prince Izzeddine, the
-Sultan’s eldest son, on his way to the Seraskierat
-(Ministry of War), desiring him to return to the Palace,
-and to inform the Sultan that they demanded the dismissal
-of Mahmoud Nedim, the Grand Vizier and of Hassan
-Fehmi Effendi, the Sheik‐ul‐Islam. The Sultan did not
-venture to reject the demand. Mahmoud and Hassan
-Fehmi were dismissed, the latter being replaced by
-Hassan Hairullah Effendi, who enjoyed a high and
-exceptional reputation for learning and enlightenment.
-Mehemet Rushdi Pasha, an old man universally respected,
-was named Grand Vizier; and as he insisted on Midhat
-joining his Cabinet (although holding no specific office), it
-was believed that he would be the guiding spirit, and general
-satisfaction was felt. Sir Henry Elliot proceeds to say:</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“This general satisfaction did not last long. The
-Sultan quickly showed his determination to resist all
-reforms by appointing to high posts several of the worst
-of the old school of Pashas, and it then became so
-evident to me that an attempt to depose him would
-certainly very shortly be made, that on the 25th May I
-put my conviction on record in a despatch in which I
-wrote that the word ‘Constitution’ was in every mouth;
-that the Softas, representing the intelligent public opinion
-of the Capital, knowing themselves to be supported by
-the bulk of the Nation&mdash;Christian as well as Mahomedan&mdash;would
-not, I believed, relax their efforts till they obtained
-it, and that should the Sultan refuse to grant it, an attempt
-to depose him appeared almost inevitable; that texts
-from the Koran were circulated proving to the faithful
-that the form of Government sanctioned by it was properly
-democratic, and that the absolute authority now wielded
-by the Sovereign was an usurpation of the rights of the
-people and not sanctioned by the Sacred Law; and both
-texts and precedents were appealed to to show that
-allegiance was not due to a Sovereign who neglected the
-interests of the State. The disaffection, I said, now ran
-through every class, and from the Pashas down to the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">82</a></span>porters in the streets and the boatmen on the Bosphorus,
-no one thought any longer of concealing his opinions....
-Within a week after my reports were written, the deposition
-had been effected....”</p></div>
-
-<p>The two moving spirits in the deposition of Sultan
-Abdul Aziz were undoubtedly Midhat Pasha and Hussein
-Avni Pasha, the Minister of War (<em>seraskier</em>). The latter,
-a thorough soldier and a sterling patriot, distinguished for
-the great energy and decision of his character as well as
-the impetuosity of his temper, had occupied the highest
-military posts in the country, and had been repeatedly
-exiled from Constantinople by the Sultan. He was
-particularly feared and disliked by Mahmoud Nedim,
-who had procured his banishment each time that he
-had been made Grand Vizier. Although not sharing
-all Midhat’s constitutional views and professing more
-confidence in the efficacy of the sword than in the
-saving grace of popular institutions, he had lent a
-willing and energetic support to his colleague’s views as
-to the indisputable necessity of deposing the Sultan as
-a preliminary to any attempted amelioration in the condition
-of the State.</p>
-
-<p>As soon as the final resolution of Ministers was arrived
-at, and before any commencement of execution could be
-given to it, it was indispensable to obtain a <em>Fetva</em> (authoritative
-decree) of the Sheik‐ul‐Islam, Hassan Hairullah, the
-highest authority and mouthpiece of the Sacred Law, in
-order to give legal validity to the act of deposition.
-Accordingly the following <em>Fetva</em> was issued for the
-deposition:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“If the Chief of the Faithful gives proof of mental derangement;
-if he displays ignorance of State matters; if he
-employs the public revenues for his personal expenditure,
-beyond what the Nation and the State can support; if he
-introduces confusion into political and spiritual concerns,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">83</a></span>and if his continuance in power becomes injurious to the
-nation, may he be deposed?”</p>
-
-<p>Answer: “The Cheri pronounces ‘Yes.’</p>
-
-<p class="center2">“Signed by the humble</p>
-
-<p class="right padr5">“<span class="smcap">Hassan Hairullah</span>,</p>
-
-<p class="right">“To whom God grant His indulgence.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>Djemaziel Evel</i>, 1293, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-
-<span class="h">xxxxx</span>(30<i>th May</i> 1876.)</small></p></div>
-
-<p>Armed with this <em>Fetva</em>, Ministers decided on the
-immediate execution of their plans, the details of which,
-it was agreed, should be left to the Grand Vizier, to
-Midhat, and to the Minister of War.</p>
-
-<p>There was a slight divergence of views between Midhat
-and the Seraskier with reference to the form of procedure
-which should accompany the deposition. Hussein Avni
-inclined to a simple military <i lang="it" xml:lang="it">pronunciamento</i>, whereas
-Midhat wished to give the consecration of popular sanction
-to the act. For this purpose he proposed that the Softas
-and the population of Stamboul should be convoked <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">en
-masse</i> to the Noure‐Osmanieh Mosque, where they should
-set forth the griefs of the nation and demand a change of
-<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">régime</i>; and that on this demand being refused or ignored,
-they should proceed at once to the execution of the decree
-of deposition. The majority of Ministers inclined to this
-latter method of proceeding; but a circumstance occurred
-which necessitated a change of plans and determined the
-abandonment of the proposal for a popular demonstration.</p>
-
-<p>The 31st May was chosen for the execution of the
-plan agreed upon. On the eve of that day information
-reached Midhat from a woman of the Palace that the
-Sultan had had wind of the affair, and that the whole plot
-was about to be discovered. This was corroborated by
-the fact that twice that same day Hussein Avni had been
-peremptorily summoned to the Palace, although on the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">84</a></span>
-first summons he had pleaded illness as a reason for
-disregarding it.</p>
-
-<p>It was decided thereupon by the Ministers to anticipate
-the hour fixed upon, and to proceed at once with the
-execution of their design.</p>
-
-<p>At midnight accordingly, of the 30th of May, Mehemet
-Rushdi and Midhat, accompanied each by a single
-attendant carrying a lamp, proceeded to Sirkedji to
-embark on a <em>caïque</em><a name="FNanchor_11_11" id="FNanchor_11_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_11" class="fnanchor">11</a> for Pachalimani on the Bosphorus,
-the residence of Hussein Avni. It was a pitch‐dark night
-with rain falling in torrents, and it was with some difficulty
-that they reached the place of rendezvous. Here they
-found Hussein Avni anxiously waiting for them, and after
-a hurried interview in which the final dispositions were
-made, they separated to their respective posts. Hussein
-Avni started for the palace of Dolma‐Bagtche, whilst
-Rushdi and Midhat proceeded to the Seraskierat.</p>
-
-<p>It had been decided that the Ministers and high civil
-and military dignitaries should assemble at the War Office
-and await the arrival of Prince Murad, whom Hussein
-Avni had undertaken to conduct there in person; and
-that as soon as he should arrive, the proclamation and
-investiture of the Prince as the new Sultan should take
-place. It was further arranged that immediately on the
-arrival of the Prince a bonfire should be lit on the tower
-of the Seraskierat, as a signal to the fleet of what was
-taking place, and thereupon a Royal salute should be
-fired by Kaisserli Ahmed’s ironclads, to announce to the
-whole city the commencement of a new reign.</p>
-
-<p>Hussein Avni, proceeding in the direction of the
-Palace, was, according to preconcerted arrangement, met
-by Suleiman Pasha, to whom the delicate task of executing
-the measures necessary to be taken at the Palace had
-been entrusted.</p>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">85</a></span></p>
-<p>Suleiman Pasha, marshal in the army and director‐in‐chief
-of the school of military cadets at Pancaldi, the
-trusted lieutenant and right‐hand man of Hussein Avni,
-himself a strong partisan of Midhat Pasha and the young
-hope of the Reform Party, was the very man to carry
-out an operation requiring careful preparation and unflinching
-resolution for its successful execution.</p>
-
-<p>The troops in the barracks of Tash‐Kishla and
-Kumuch‐Suyou had already received their orders from
-Redif Pasha, the commander of the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">corps d’armée</i> of
-Constantinople, and had been so posted as to blockade
-all approaches by land. The fleet of ironclads under the
-personal command of Kaiseli Ahmed, the captain Pasha,
-had taken the same precautions by sea, so that nothing
-remained but to disarm the sentinels and <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">corps de garde</i>
-along the immediate approaches to the Palace. Suleiman,
-taking with him a selected body of military students from
-Pancaldi, under the command of Ahmed Bey (colonel) and
-Bedry and Rifat Beys (captains), after successfully performing,
-without disturbance but not without some opposition,
-the delicate operation of disarmament, hastened to
-the apartments of Prince Murad. Although the Prince
-had been made aware of the intentions of the Ministers,
-and had acquiesced in their general arrangements, it had
-been found impossible to acquaint him with the change of
-date resolved upon. He, therefore, fearing some surprise
-or treachery, hesitated for some time before he could be
-induced to comply with Suleiman’s urgent request that
-he should immediately join Hussein Avni, who was waiting
-for him in a carriage at the gates of the Palace to drive
-him to the Seraskierat, where his proclamation and investiture
-as the new sovereign were to take place. At
-one moment it looked as if the solemn drama about to
-be enacted would have to be played out with the part of
-the “Prince of Denmark” omitted.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">86</a></span></p>
-
-<p>Having surmounted this unexpected difficulty and
-despatched Murad on his way to the Seraskierat,
-Suleiman proceeded to discharge the second and more
-distasteful part of the mandate confided to him. Making
-his way to the Imperial apartments, and overcoming
-the hesitation of the attendants by presenting an
-order signed by all the Ministers, he peremptorily
-demanded to be immediately led into the presence of
-the Sultan. The demand being at last complied with,
-he proceeded to communicate to Abdul Aziz the justification
-of his intrusion, and read to him the <em>fetva</em> of
-the deposition. Whilst the Sultan and Suleiman were
-engaged in parleying, the big guns of Ahmed’s ironclads
-were heard booming in the distance. Abdul Aziz at once
-took in the import of the firing, and from that moment
-yielded to the inevitable. He prepared to comply with the
-order communicated to him to quit the Palace of Dolma‐Bagtche
-for that of Top‐Kapou, which had been assigned
-as a residence for him.</p>
-
-<p>The new Sultan confirmed all his Ministers in their
-posts, addressing the following letter to the Porte:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center"><i>To my Grand Vizier and very patriotic Mehemet Rushdi
-Pasha</i>&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“By the favour of the Almighty and the will of my
-subjects, we have ascended the throne of our ancestors,
-and by reason of your patriotism and ability in the discharge
-of your duties as Grand Vizier, we confirm you and
-all your colleagues in your former posts. The numerous
-difficulties experienced for some time past both in our
-domestic affairs and foreign relations, have produced uneasiness
-in the public mind, and caused detriment to the
-material and territorial interests of the country. The
-necessity of amending this state of things and of adopting
-remedial measures such as shall insure the happiness
-and secure the confidence of our subjects, imposes itself
-imperatively upon us; and to effect these purposes, it
-is absolutely necessary to organise the administration of
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">87</a></span>the State on a basis of stability and justice. Our exclusive
-attention will be directed to this end, and for this purpose
-we desire that our Ministers, after due deliberation, shall
-submit to us for our approbation their views on the means
-by which, whilst respecting the laws of the Cheri and of
-Justice, the organisation of our Empire in accordance with
-the wants and requirements of our people can be effected,
-with the view of procuring to all our subjects alike, without
-distinction or restriction, the completest liberty compatible
-with order; and, moreover, that our Ministers shall
-communicate to us their views on the application of such
-just laws and regulations as shall be calculated to consolidate
-and unify the national and patriotic sentiments of all
-our subjects. It is clear, moreover, that in order to obtain
-these objects, it is indispensable to reorganise the Council
-of State, the Ministers of Justice, as well as of public
-Institutions and of the Finances, as well as other departments
-of State; and it is, moreover, evident that one of the
-principal reforms of all will consist in establishing on a
-sound foundation the financial situation of the Empire, and
-in taking steps that no expenditure shall be tolerated that
-shall not have been provided for by the Budget of the
-State, by which measures it may be hoped that public
-credit and confidence will be restored. In order to help
-to obtain this result, we hereby diminish our Civil list by
-the sum of £T300,000, and surrender to the State the
-coal‐mines of Heraclia and the other mines and manufactories
-appertaining to the Civil list; and we recommend
-that like economies shall be effected in all the various
-branches of the administration, so as to establish an
-equilibrium in our finances. Our liveliest desire is for
-a continuance of intimate relations with all the friendly
-Powers, by the strictest observance of treaty obligations,
-and all our efforts will be directed to this end, and we
-pray the Almighty to crown them with success.</p>
-
-<p><small>“9 <i>Djemaziel Evel</i>, 1293, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-<span class="h">xxxxxx</span>(2<i>nd June</i> 1876.)</small></p></div>
-
-<p>Besides the retention of their portfolios by all the
-Ministers, Kemal Bey (the best known and most distinguished
-poet and litterateur of Turkey) and Zia Bey
-(equally celebrated as a poet and patriot) were appointed
-as his private secretaries, and Sadullah Bey (well known<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">88</a></span>
-for his liberal sympathies and opinions) made chief of the
-Sultan’s secretariat&mdash;important guarantees for the smooth
-working of the machinery of State, and security against
-the revival of the old pernicious intrigues of the Palace
-against the Ministers of the Porte. Murad had, moreover,
-undertaken to promulgate the Constitution prepared by
-Midhat and his colleagues at the earliest date compatible
-with the despatch of urgent public business.</p>
-
-<p>So far everything seemed to favour the Reformers. A
-revolution of the most fundamental character, involving
-the destruction of autocratic power in Turkey, and
-carrying the promise of a Constitution which would lay
-the foundations at any rate of stable government in the
-country, effected not only without bloodshed or disturbance
-of any kind, but with the assent and approval
-of all classes and creeds in the land, and with a new
-sovereign on the throne known sincerely to share the
-views of his Ministers and the aspirations of his people, all
-this seemed to ensure the prospect of healing the wounds
-of the much afflicted land of the Osmanli, and of opening
-up a new era of progress and prosperity in the East.</p>
-
-<p>But suddenly a cloud, not bigger than a man’s hand,
-lowered over the destinies of the country, and from this
-time the stars in their courses fought against Turkey, and
-violently set back the date of the promised era of
-prosperity.</p>
-
-<p>On the eventful night of the 30th‐31st May, during
-the drive with Murad to the Seraskierat, Hussein Avni
-had perceived that the Prince was suffering from violent
-nervous excitement, and these symptoms were still further
-accentuated in the return journey to the Palace of
-Dolma‐Bagtche after the ceremony of investiture was
-over&mdash;so much so that Midhat Pasha, who accompanied
-him, thought it prudent to remain in the Palace, without
-quitting it, for three days. The physicians called in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">89</a></span>
-consultation did not at first take a grave view of the
-case, and sanguine hopes were entertained that, in a
-short time, by pursuing the regimen of repose and hygiene
-recommended by these authorities, Sultan Murad would
-rapidly recover his health and be able to discharge the
-duties incumbent on him. Dr Lamsdorf of Vienna, the
-celebrated specialist, made a very favourable diagnosis of
-the case. A happy issue of this most unfortunate and
-inopportune malady was now generally hoped for and
-expected, when two startling events occurred in rapid
-succession, each seriously aggravating and affecting the
-Sultan Murad’s nervous condition of health, and together
-fatally compromising the hope of rapid recovery.</p>
-
-<p>The first of these tragedies referred to was enacted in
-the Palace of Tcheragan, five days after the dethronement
-of the late Sultan. Abdul Aziz, whose imperious temper
-could ill brook the change of destiny that had overtaken
-him, had already made one or two unsuccessful attempts,
-which were with difficulty thwarted, to throw himself out
-of the windows of the Palace. On the morning of the 5th
-June, he asked for a pair of scissors with which to trim his
-beard. On the attendants demurring to comply with
-this request, the Valide Sultan ordered the scissors to be
-given to her son. Shortly after this, the ladies of her
-suite, looking out of a window of a corridor that commanded
-a view on the room occupied by the late Sultan,
-saw him sitting quietly in an armchair with his back
-turned to the window; but shortly afterwards, perceiving
-that his head had dropped on his lap, they ran to the
-door and tried to open it. Finding it locked, and fearing
-a catastrophe, they ran screaming to the Valide Sultan
-and informed her of what they suspected. Orders being
-given to break into the room, they found Abdul Aziz
-sitting in the posture already described, and in a pool of
-blood flowing from two wounds in his arms, evidently<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">90</a></span>
-caused by the scissors, which had fallen beside him on
-the floor. The physicians, who were hastily summoned,
-could only confirm the apprehension that life was extinct,
-and the Ministers, immediately apprised of the fact
-of the tragedy, ordered an immediate examination of
-the body to be made by all the available medical men
-in Constantinople, hastily summoned to draw up an
-official report on the subject. Seventeen medical men
-of all nationalities, comprising all the most distinguished
-in the city and in the Embassies of the great Powers,
-signed a unanimous report to the effect that death was
-undoubtedly due to suicide, and handed the following
-certificate:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“The year 1876 <span class="smcap">A.D.</span>, on the 23rd of May, O.S., the
-4th of June, N.S., or the year of the Hegira, the 11th of
-the month of Djemazi‐el‐ewel 1293, Sunday, at 11 o’clock
-<span class="smcap">A.M.</span>, we, the undersigned doctors of medicine, namely,
-Marco Pasha, Nouri Pasha, Julius Millingen, Caratheodori,
-Sotto, Dickson, Marroin, Nouridjian, Spadare, Vitalis,
-S. Spagnolo, Marc Markel, Jatropoulo, Miltiadi Bey,
-Abdinour Effendi, Mustafa Effendi, Servet Bey, Mehmed
-Bey and Jacques de Castro, being summoned by the
-ministry by order of His Imperial Majesty to ascertain
-the cause of the death of the ex‐Sultan Abdul Aziz,
-proceeded to the guard‐house situated near the Imperial
-Palace of Tcheragan. There we were ushered into a
-chamber on the ground floor and found a body lying
-on a mattress on the floor. The body was covered with
-a new white linen cloth. On removing this cloth we
-recognised the ex‐Sultan Abdul Aziz. All the parts of
-the body were cold and bloodless, pale, or covered with
-coagulated blood. The corpse was not rigid, the eyelids
-were partially unclosed, the corneæ were slightly opaque,
-the mouth partly open. Linen cloths, soaked in blood
-covered the arms and legs. On lifting the linen coverings
-on the arms we discovered a gash near the joint of the
-left arm five centimetres long and three centimetres deep.
-The edges of the wound were hacked and irregular. The
-direction of the wound was from above to below, and
-from inside to outside. The veins of this region were
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">91</a></span>cut, and the cubital artery at its emerging point was
-three‐fourths severed. At the joint of the right arm we
-discovered a wound, slightly oblique, also hacked, two
-centimetres long and one centimetre deep. On this side
-the wounds were only in the smaller veins; the arteries
-were intact.</p>
-
-<p>“We were shown a pair of scissors ten centimetres
-long, very sharp, one point of which bore a small lateral
-projection near its summit. The scissors were stained
-with blood, and we were told that the ex‐Sultan Abdul
-Aziz had with these scissors inflicted upon himself the
-wounds above described.</p>
-
-<p>“We then proceeded to the residence of the late
-Sultan, where we were ushered into a large chamber
-looking on to the sea. There we found in the corner of
-a sofa, placed near a window, a pool of blood spread
-over that article of furniture, and on the matting of the
-floor a great quantity of coagulated blood in one mass,
-and further several stains spread over the room.</p>
-
-<p>“From what precedes we are unanimously of opinion:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p>“1. That the death of the ex‐Sultan Abdul Aziz was
-caused by the loss of blood produced by the wounds
-of the blood‐vessels at the joints of the arms.</p>
-
-<p>“2. That the instrument shown to us could certainly
-produce such wounds.</p>
-
-<p>“3. That the direction and nature of the wounds,
-together with the instrument which is said to have
-produced them, lead us to conclude that suicide had
-been committed.</p>
-
-<p>“In witness whereof we have accordingly drawn up
-and signed the present minute of proceedings at the
-guard‐house of Tcheragan on the day, month and year
-aforesaid.</p>
-
-<p class="center">“<i>Signed</i>:</p>
-
-<p>“Dr Marco, Nouri, A. Sotto, Physician attached to
-the Imperial and Royal Embassy of Austria‐Hungary;
-Dr Spagnolo, Marc Markel, Jatropoulo, Abdinour, Servet,
-J. de Castro, A. Marroin, Julius Millingen, C. Caratheodori;
-E. D. Dickson, Physician of the British Embassy; Dr
-O. Vitalis, Physician of the Sanitary Board; Dr E.
-Spadare, J. Nouridjian, Miltiadi Bey, Mustafa, Mehmed.”</p></div>
-
-<p>The body was transferred to Top‐Kapou and buried
-in the mausoleum of Sultan Mahmoud.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">92</a></span></p>
-
-<p>Ten days after the tragedy at the Palace of Tcheragan
-the news of which had deeply affected Sultan Murad,
-another quickly followed, in some respects of a still more
-startling character, and calculated to prostrate still further
-a mind already unhinged.</p>
-
-<p>A Circassian captain, formerly aide‐de‐camp of the
-Sultan Abdul Aziz, one Hassan by name, on whom
-certain suspicion of violent intentions rested, had been
-ordered to Bagdad, and on his showing signs of
-recalcitrancy, he was imprisoned for insubordination by
-orders of Hussein Avni, the Minister of War. Feigning
-submission, he was released after two days’ detention.
-On the 15th June, during a Cabinet Council which was
-being held at the house of Midhat Pasha, and at which
-all the Ministers were present, Tcherkess Hassan, armed
-with no less than six revolvers, forcing the consigne
-without much difficulty, managed to penetrate into the
-room where the Council was sitting, and advancing straight
-up to Hussein Avni, discharged a barrel of a revolver
-at him, and turning sharply on Reshid Pasha, the
-Minister of Foreign Affairs, shot him dead on the spot.
-The Minister of Marine, Kaisserli Ahmed, threw himself
-on the assassin and tried to disarm him, but he was
-immediately stabbed with a poniard that Hassan carried
-in his left hand. Hussein Avni, although severely
-wounded, managed to make his way to the staircase,
-but Hassan, following him, struck at him furiously in the
-neck with his dagger and despatched him. Returning to
-the Council room he discharged his revolvers promiscuously
-all around him, smashing the chandelier suspended in
-the middle of the room, and consequently plunging the
-room into darkness. It was this that probably saved the
-lives of the remaining Ministers, for Kaisserli Ahmed,
-though wounded, and Mehemet Rushdi, and Halid
-succeeded in escaping into an adjoining boudoir, where<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">93</a></span>
-they barricaded the door against their furious assailant,
-who, having despatched the War Minister, seemed chiefly
-bent on wreaking vengeance on the Minister of Marine.
-Midhat escaped by a miracle, and by slipping off his
-coat, the sleeve of which he left in the hand of Hassan
-who had seized it in the darkness. One of Midhat’s
-servants, Ahmed Aga, on hearing the firing, had rushed
-into the room and tried to seize the assassin from
-behind, but Hassan turned sharply on him and shot
-him dead. The same fate attended Chukri Bey, the
-aide‐de‐camp of the Minister of Marine, who also rushed
-in to the rescue. At last a guard of <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">gendarmerie</i> appeared
-on the scene, and a regular fusillade ensued between the
-Circassian at bay and the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">gendarmes</i> reinforced by a picket
-of soldiers; it was only then, after a regular pitched battle,
-that this determined criminal was at length overpowered
-and seized.</p>
-
-<p>He was very soon afterwards tried, and hanged in
-due course, stoutly denying to the last that he had any
-accomplices.</p>
-
-<p>The effect of these compound tragedies on the mind
-of the Sultan Murad was disastrous. His recovery,
-sanguine hopes of which had been held out by Dr
-Lamsdorf, the famous specialist summoned from Vienna
-to give his opinion on the state of the Sultan’s health,
-seemed destined to be indefinitely postponed. Two
-parties, holding distinct views on the situation and the
-manner it should be dealt with, now showed themselves
-among the Ministers and the high Court officials.
-Mehemet Rushdi especially, the old experienced vizier
-and the majority of Ministers well aware of the favourable
-disposition of Sultan Murad towards the cause of reform,
-and very averse to taking a plunge in the dark, leant to the
-opinion that patience should be exercised and reasonable
-time given for the recovery of the Sultan’s health.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">94</a></span></p>
-
-<p>But another and very active party had in the meantime
-been formed, of which Damad Mahmoud Djelaleddin Pasha
-(the Sultan’s brother‐in‐law) was the moving spirit, and
-which included, together with some high Palace officials,
-one or two of the influential marshals, such as Redif
-Pasha, the commander of the Constantinople <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">corps d’armée</i>
-and under the influence of Damad Mahmoud Djelaleddin.
-This party&mdash;as far as it could be said to have been based
-on any particular political opinions, and not on the simple
-ground of ambition and the desire to exercise a preponderating
-influence in the future <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">régime</i>&mdash;consisted of
-the men who had acquiesced, and even participated, in
-the dethronement of the late Sultan, but did not share,
-and some of them were even bitterly opposed to, the
-constitutional views advocated by Midhat and the reforming
-party. Borne along by the current of events which
-they would have been impotent to resist, they would
-have constituted a helpless minority in the State without
-power or influence, if they had had to do with a reforming
-Sultan on the throne, a palace where men like Zia Bey,
-and Kemal Bey were the guiding spirits, and the party of
-reform in strong possession of the Porte. The prospect,
-however, of being able to change the occupant of the
-throne and place their own candidate upon it afforded
-them the precious opportunity of upsetting the whole
-edifice of reform, of themselves seizing the chief power of
-the State, and turning the revolution that had been
-accomplished to their own exclusive advantage. It was
-less a victory of reaction than a triumph of ambition.</p>
-
-<p>Damad Mahmoud Djelaleddin was a very ignorant
-and uncultivated man, and though careless and without
-a conviction in respect to political opinions, he enjoyed
-the reputation of being neither careless nor indifferent
-with respect to matters of personal or pecuniary concern
-to himself. On the other hand, he was endowed with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">95</a></span>
-great, almost brutal, determination of character, and was
-utterly reckless as to the means of carrying out his
-ends. His position of Damad (brother‐in‐law to the
-Sultan) gave him great influence in the Palace, and
-at the same time secured him weight in the Councils
-of the State. He was the very soul of the anti‐reform
-conspiracy.</p>
-
-<p>Having described Damad Mahmoud Djelaleddin, the
-character of his lieutenant, Redif Pasha, can be described
-in a sentence: he was Damad Mahmoud <em>in petto</em>.
-Whatever qualities distinguished the master were conspicuous
-in the lieutenant, and only in a less degree,
-inasmuch as he was physically of a somewhat less
-robust nature. He had, like Mahmoud, lent himself
-with all the weight of his military position to the
-dethronement of Abdul Aziz, but he viewed with an
-evil eye the advance of reform, and still more the
-triumph of the reformers.</p>
-
-<p>These two men practically constituted the central
-power of the conspiracy, for those who co‐operated with
-them were scarcely admitted into the inner councils or
-secret plans of the Duumvirate, although themselves the
-willing participators in the conspiracy.</p>
-
-<p>Among them was Djevdet Pasha, Minister of Justice,
-who, during all the stirring events of the Vizierate of
-Mehemet Rushdi, had been lying low in the Cabinet waiting
-for the opportune moment to show his colours and
-take part in the overthrow of the ministry.</p>
-
-<p>Whilst enumerating the instruments of Mahmoud’s
-ambition, it would be impossible to omit the names of two
-other men who, although they had not yet emerged into the
-notoriety which they were soon to enjoy, were indispensable
-tools of Mahmoud’s ambition, and powerfully contributed
-to the success of his plans. These were the two
-Saïds. The one was brother‐in‐law of Mahmoud, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">96</a></span>
-destined for the important post of first aide‐de‐camp to
-the Sultan Abdul Hamid. He was generally known as
-“Ingless Saïd Pasha,” for his having been educated at
-Woolwich, and though entirely wanting in initiative or
-political convictions, was naturally of a frank and loyal
-disposition, not deficient in energy, and an invaluable
-coadjutor in carrying out the views of his brother‐in‐law.
-With Redif Pasha he formed the third member of the
-Triumvirate, which Mahmoud intended should, during the
-succeeding reign, govern the country. The other Saïd, of
-whom a great deal more will have to be said hereafter,
-was known, on account of his small stature, as “Saïd
-Kutchouk” (small), and when he reaches the dignity of
-Pasha, it will be necessary to distinguish him from the
-other Saïd by this appellation. He was supposed to be
-the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">âme damnée</i> of Mahmoud, especially by Mahmoud
-himself, who destined him for the important confidential
-post of First Secretary to the Sultan.</p>
-
-<p>Without any doubt, Damad’s plans were well conceived,
-and his net was well spread. The post of Vice‐Sultan he
-reserved for himself.</p>
-
-<p>Behind these were marshalled the whole phalanx of
-Reaction, and the Konak of Mahmoud become the Cave
-of Adullam of all the malcontents.</p>
-
-<p>The means of action were not wanting to the conspirators
-in this respect; indeed, the material to their
-hand was only too abundant. A sovereign of unsound
-mind is not recognised by the Ottoman Constitution.
-The girding of the Padishah with the sword of Osman,
-as an essential part of the ceremony of investiture, was
-to the Ottoman sovereigns what the sacred oil of Rheims
-was to the kings of France, and this ceremony had not
-taken place.</p>
-
-<p>No Sultan, moreover, had ever before absented himself
-from attendance at the mosque on Friday, and the Selam<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">97</a></span>lik
-that follows. The public anxiety and excitement on
-the subject were genuine and universal. Public affairs,
-too, were suffering: the Constitution was, in a double sense,
-suspended; the new Constitution could not be promulgated,
-and the old Constitution, such as it was, could
-not be worked; the mainspring of the machinery of State
-was deranged. Foreign diplomacy, too, was beginning to
-take an active part in the matter. The ambassadors and
-envoys from foreign States were asking to whom, and
-when, they could present their credentials. The Russian
-Embassy&mdash;that seemed to have better information relative
-to Prince Hamid’s character than Ministers themselves&mdash;was
-particularly persistent and active in this respect. It was
-evident that the crisis could not be indefinitely prolonged.</p>
-
-<p>In these circumstances, it was resolved by Ministers
-that Midhat should go to Muslou‐Oglou, where Prince
-Hamid, heir presumptive to the throne, resided, in order
-to ascertain by a personal interview with him whether
-Ministers could rely on his co‐operation to carry out the
-important reforms that they had in hand, should it become
-absolutely necessary to remove Murad from the throne,
-and in that event, to agree to certain clear and definite
-stipulations with the Prince as conditions of their support.</p>
-
-<p>These stipulations were the following:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p>1. To promulgate without delay the new Constitution.</p>
-
-<p>2. To act in matters of State only with the advice of
-his responsible advisers.</p>
-
-<p>3. To appoint Zia Bey and Kemal Bey his private
-secretaries, and to make Sadullah Bey the head of the
-Palace Secretariat.</p>
-
-<p>The importance attached by Midhat and Rushdi to
-this last condition was very great. It afforded a guarantee
-against those intrigues of the Palace which had ship‐wrecked
-so many schemes of reform, and prevented, so far
-as was possible, a renewal of that mute opposition between<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">98</a></span>
-the Palace and the Porte which had existed for centuries,
-and had paralysed the efforts of so many Ministers.</p>
-
-<p>At this historical interview at Muslou‐Oglou Prince
-Hamid evidently “played a deep game” with Midhat
-Pasha. He promised all and more than all that was
-asked of him. He pretended to opinions more advanced
-than the most advanced of his Ministers, and in favour of
-even a more democratic Constitution than the one elaborated.
-The other condition he accepted without demur.</p>
-
-<p>On receiving these clear and emphatic declarations,
-Midhat returned to Stamboul and reported the result of
-his interview to the assembled Ministers, who thereupon
-resolved to take the decisive step and put Prince Hamid
-on the throne in the place of his brother Murad.</p>
-
-<p>As on the occasion of the dethronement of the Sultan
-Abdul Aziz, it was necessary to obtain a <em>Fetva</em> from the
-Sheik‐ul‐Islam to the effect that the contemplated step
-was in accordance with the Sacred Law. Mehemet Rushdi
-thereupon demanded an official report from six principal
-physicians in Constantinople&mdash;of whom four belonged to
-the Embassies of the Great Powers&mdash;who, after examination
-of Murad, handed to him the following certificates:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“On the 31st of the month August, 1876, Chaban 11:
-1293 Hegira, we have made a report on the health of
-His Majesty Sultan Murad, and come to certain conclusions
-which we hereby confirm, and add thereto the
-following opinion, viz. that even should the Sultan Murad
-after a long lapse of time, contrary to expectation, recover
-his intellectual faculties, these can never recover their normal
-condition.”</p>
-
-<p>“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Castro</span>.<br />
-
-<span class="smcap padl4">Akif.</span><br />
-
-<span class="smcap padl4">Dickson</span>, <cite>Physician to English Embassy</cite>.<br />
-
-<span class="smcap padl4">Marroin</span>, <cite>Physician to French Embassy</cite>.<br />
-
-<span class="smcap padl4">Muhlig</span>, <cite>Physician to German Embassy</cite>.<br />
-
-<span class="smcap padl4">Sotto</span>, <cite>Physician to Austro‐Hungarian Embassy</cite>.”<br />
-</p></div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">99</a></span></p>
-
-<p>Thereupon Mehemet Rushdi made a speech to the
-people gathered together to hear the report of these
-physicians at the Palace of Top‐Kapou.</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“Our sovereign, the Emperor Murad,” he said, “has been
-enabled to reign for only twelve days, but during that time
-he has been afflicted with an illness which, in spite of all the
-efforts of human science, has shown no amendment. His
-intellectual faculties are in a state of great feebleness, and
-the physicians pronounce them incurable. Nevertheless
-we have waited for the expiration of the legal delay, and
-this delay has now expired. This is the sum total of the
-truth of the matter. Let us be informed of what, under
-such circumstances, the law of the Cheri dictates.”</p></div>
-
-<p>The assembled crowd expressed its sense of the
-justice of these words, and the Sheik‐ul‐Islam, Hassan
-Hairullah, gave the following <em>Fetva</em>:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“If the Commander of the Faithful is suffering from
-mental alienation and if the exercise of his function is
-thereby rendered impracticable, can he be deposed?</p>
-
-<p>“Answer: The Cheri says ‘Yes.’</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Hassan Hairullah</span>,</p>
-
-<p class="right">“To whom God grant His indulgence.</p>
-
-<p><small>“12 <i>Chaban</i> 1293, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(1<i>st September</i> 1876.)</small></p></div>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">100</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER IV<br /><br />
-
-<small>ABDUL HAMID SULTAN</small></h2>
-
-<p>The act of dethronement of Sultan Murad V. was
-now accomplished. On Thursday, 1st September 1876,
-Prince Hamid, surrounded by all the great Civil and
-Military dignitaries of the State, descended the Grand
-Rue of Pera on horseback, on his way to Top‐Kapou
-at Stamboul. The people thronged in large crowds to
-see the procession, but dazed by the series of dramatic
-events that were so rapidly succeeding one another, they
-viewed the spectacle with silence and without enthusiasm.
-There seemed a feeling of anxiety in the air as of the
-prescience of future evils.</p>
-
-<p>From Stamboul the Prince passed in a State <em>caïque</em>
-to the Palace of Dolma‐Bagtche. Monday, the 15th of
-the month Chaban, was fixed for the reception of the
-Biat (first ceremony of the investiture), and on that day
-a deputation of notabilities of Finance, accompanied by
-the chiefs of the five non‐Mussulman communities, headed
-by Jean Lorando, presented the Sultan elect with an
-address of congratulation in the name of the city of
-Galata, and to this the Sultan made the following reply:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“I thank you for your congratulations; I have only
-one desire, and that is the progress of our country and
-peace for all our subjects. They will perceive by the
-logic of facts the fulfilment of the promise of the reforms
-made to them. They, too, on their part, must, in order
-to enjoy these privileges, give proof of the strict observance
-of the duties incumbent on them.”</p></div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">101</a></span></p>
-
-<p>To his Ministers he made a short speech, counselling
-union and agreement among themselves as the condition
-and symbol of union among all the subjects of the empire,
-and “counselled and ordered” them to prove their union
-by their acts.</p>
-
-<p>The following Thursday, 18th of the month Chaban,
-was fixed for the great ceremony of investiture. On the
-morning of that day Abdul Hamid embarked in a <em>caïque</em>
-for Eyoub, the suburb on the Golden Horn, where the
-sword of Osman and the other sacred relics are kept, and
-on his passage thither he was saluted by the guns of the
-fleet anchored there, and the shout of the sailors manning
-the yards, “Padishahim tchok Yasha!”</p>
-
-<p>After the important ceremony here was over, and the
-investiture of the new Padishah was thus completed, he proceeded,
-according to usage, to the mausoleum of Selim I.,
-the founder of the Ottoman Caliphate, and thence to
-the mausoleum of Abdul Medjid, his father and the father
-of Murad, and lastly to the Palace of Top‐Kapou, where
-the mantle of the Prophet and the sacred Banner are
-deposited; and at night, the ceremony of this important
-day being over, he returned to the Palace of Dolma‐Bagtche,
-where the ceremony of the investiture was
-completed.</p>
-
-<p>Girt with the sword of Osman, Hamid II. reigned
-over Turkey, and the dark gloom of the Hamidian epoch
-was now about to settle over the land of the Osmanli.</p>
-
-<p>On leaving the Palace of Dolma‐Bagtche that night
-old Mehemet Rushdi, turning to his colleagues, said to
-them: “We have been in a great hurry to get rid of
-Murad. May we never have cause to repent what we
-have done.”</p>
-
-<p>With these quasi‐prophetic words on his lips, feeling
-no doubt that a new era of struggles was about to open
-for which younger men were required, the veteran Grand<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">102</a></span>
-Vizier, who had piloted the country through one <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">coup d’état</i>,
-and had very unwillingly assisted at a second dethronement,
-in consideration of his great age and feeble state
-of health, requested to be relieved of the duties of Grand
-Vizier. His request was granted, but three months after,
-Midhat, universally designated for the post, was nominated
-as his successor. These three months were passed under
-the Grand Vizierate of Mehemet Rushdi Pasha, but it was
-Midhat who was leader of the Cabinet, and Mehemet
-Rushdi was only the mouthpiece of Midhat, until the
-latter finally replaced him on the 16th December
-1876.</p>
-
-<p>The first audience accorded by the new sovereign
-to foreign envoys was to Count Zichy, the Austro‐Hungarian
-Ambassador, accompanied by the Secretary
-of his Embassy. Safvet Pasha, the Minister of Foreign
-Affairs, was present. The audience lasted one hour, and
-turned exclusively on the affairs of Herzegovina, the
-ambassador laying stress on the gravity of the events
-passing there, the anxiety and expenses that disturbances
-on its borders caused the Dual Empire, and exhortations
-to the new sovereign to listen to the advice of the
-friendly Powers. All this was, as we have seen, in the
-strictest conformity with the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">rôle</i> that Austria had been
-playing for two years. Having set light to the gunpowder
-in her neighbour’s house, she quoted to that neighbour
-the familiar proverb, “Proximus ardet Ucalegon,” and
-warned him of the consequences.</p>
-
-<p>The next audience was granted to the Russian
-Ambassador, General Ignatieff, recently returned from
-St Petersburg with the last instructions from his Court.
-The tone that the ambassador and envoys of Russia, the
-Strogonoffs, and Mentchikoffs, and Ignatieffs, had rendered
-familiar to the Porte on its communications on critical
-occasions, was not absent on this occasion:</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">103</a></span></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“His Majesty the Emperor, my master, officially
-informed of Your Majesty’s accession to the throne, has
-conferred on me the signal honour to represent him at
-Your Majesty’s court. The friendly relations of the
-two countries may continue on the condition of the
-interests of both being assured. His Majesty the
-Emperor cannot view with indifference what is passing
-in the Ottoman Empire, possessing, as it does, the
-commercial routes of the Black Sea and the Mediterranean,
-and a portion of the inhabitants of which is of the same
-religion as his own.</p>
-
-<p>“It is to the interest of our country that peace should
-reign in Turkey, and my country desires that late sad
-events should not be renewed, and that peace should be
-assured. His Majesty the Emperor is aware of the
-difficulties and critical moments that accompanied the
-accession of Your Majesty, and is convinced that the
-troubles will disappear, and that the re‐establishment of
-peace in the interior will be secured. His Majesty the
-Emperor prays for the success of Your Majesty.”</p></div>
-
-<p>To this speech the Sultan made answer in a few
-appropriate words:</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“More even than the Emperor of Russia ... I desire
-the progress of Turkey, peace in my provinces, and my
-most ardent desire is to secure the happiness of my
-people.”</p></div>
-
-<p>Hardly had Abdul Hamid mounted the throne than
-the conflict between the two parties already described,
-commenced. The first act of the new reign was to
-appoint the <em>personnel</em> of the Imperial Household. Damad
-Mahmoud Djelaleddin Pasha was named Grand Marshal
-of the Palace, and Saïd (Ingless) Pasha, first aide‐de‐camp
-to the Sultan. To these no objections had been raised or
-conditions imposed. Their duties had reference to what
-might be considered the more strictly household functions of
-the Palace, and their appointment lay within the exclusive
-domain of the sovereign’s personal choice. But it was
-very different with the office of First Secretary to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">104</a></span>
-Sultan (or his successor) inasmuch as this important
-functionary has always been the right hand and mouthpiece
-of the sovereign, and the person by whom and
-through whom all communications pass between Ministers
-and the Sultan; and through the confidential character
-of his office, and his ready and continual access to the
-person of the sovereign, has always enjoyed a position of
-exceptional importance, hardly second to that of the
-Grand Vizier himself. It was for this reason that
-Midhat, attaching such importance to the worthy occupancy
-of this post, had not only laid stress on the necessity of
-its being filled by a functionary in harmony with the
-views of Ministers, but had actually laid down as one of
-the three conditions to which Prince Hamid was required
-to subscribe at the interview at Muslou‐Oglou, that
-Sadullah Bey, Zia Bey and Kemal Bey should be chosen
-as occupants of the post of Secretary respectively. In
-spite of his formal acceptance of this condition, the
-Sultan informed Midhat Pasha on his very first visit to
-the Palace, that he had appointed Saïd Bey (Mahmoud’s
-man) as his First Secretary. Astounded at this breach
-of faith, and aware of its significance&mdash;although perhaps
-not recognizing the full import of it&mdash;Midhat strongly
-remonstrated with the Sultan and urged a reconsideration
-of the appointment; but in spite of the remonstrances and
-prayers of his Ministers, the Sultan remained unmoved,
-and Midhat eventually acquiesced.</p>
-
-<p>It is easy enough to be wise after the event and to see
-that Midhat ought to have put his foot down on this
-question and accepted the decisive battle thus offered
-him by the Sultan; that it ought to have been clear to
-him that this was only the first contest in a campaign
-that would decide the fate of Turkey during the whole
-of the coming reign, and that the first blow would
-probably decide the issue in the campaign. But our per<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">105</a></span>spective
-of things is of course better than was Midhat’s.
-By the light of all the subsequent events that have
-unrolled themselves before our eyes, we now know the
-character of all the actors in the drama which was commencing,
-especially of the principal actor, and of this very
-First Secretary, who was the appropriate subject of the
-first contention. We can now appreciate the character of
-Damad Mahmoud Djelaleddin, the backbone and arm of
-the reaction; of some of the Ministers who had been
-feigning for months past to support Midhat’s views and
-were only waiting the moment to betray him; and can
-recognise the existence of a matured and carefully
-laid plot to upset reform by crushing the reformers&mdash;all
-these things are palpable and clear to us in the broad
-daylight of subsequent events; but they were scarcely
-surmised or imagined at the time we are now dealing
-with. The important citadel of the Palace was delivered,
-with all its defences, into the hands of the conspirators,
-and the Palace as a whole was organised for the express
-purposes of the reformers. This strong position being
-once firmly secured, the new Sultan could afford to show
-his hand with little disguise. He could not yet afford to
-treat with Midhat; it would have been clumsy to do so
-at once, for Midhat in opposition would have been a force
-with which he would have had to reckon, and, moreover,
-he and the Constitution were both necessary as a means
-of combating the conference that was assembling; but
-short of a rupture with his Grand Vizier, which was to
-be studiously avoided, he could afford to emphasize more
-and more his opposition to the policy of Midhat, so that
-when the moment arrived he could strike a decisive blow
-with effect, and with less fear of the consequences.</p>
-
-<p>Subjects of contention between them were not far to
-seek. The speech from the throne, written by Midhat,
-which was a <i lang="it" xml:lang="it">pronunciamento</i> of the policy of a new reign<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">106</a></span>
-inaugurated under such exceptional circumstances, and
-looked for with great eagerness, was revised by the Sultan
-beyond recognition; the essential sentences were omitted,
-others of quite incomprehensive character substituted in
-their place. The keynote of the original was “a new
-Regime, the Constitution, and Reform”; this was changed,
-and meaningless colourless phrases took its place.</p>
-
-<p>In order to give the reader an exact idea of the art
-displayed in this transformation, the speech actually
-delivered on this occasion is here appended, and the
-omitted sentences of the original, placed in parentheses:</p>
-
-<h3>“HATTI HUMAYUN.</h3>
-
-<p class="center2">“<i>On ascending the Throne</i>.</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“My illustrious Vizier, Mehemet Rushdi Pasha,&mdash;</p>
-
-<p>“By the Divine will my elder brother, Sultan Murad
-V., vacated the throne, and according to the law
-of succession We have mounted the throne of our
-Ancestors.</p>
-
-<p>“Appreciating your great qualities, your ability and
-experience in the affairs of State, We confirm you in the
-functions of Grand Vizier and of President of the Council
-of Ministers (avec le titre de Premier Ministre), and
-direct all Our Ministers to keep their respective posts.
-Confident in the assistance of the Almighty, We will
-pursue Our object of strengthening Our Empire, and of
-making all Our subjects, without exception, participate
-in the blessings of liberty, peace, and justice; We trust
-that Our Ministers will help us in the realisation of Our
-wishes (for Turkey ranks among the great Powers, and
-in order to attain this object and to march on a footing
-of equality with its neighbours in the progress of the
-sciences, she must needs follow the same methods; and
-as the Constitutional system is one of the principal causes
-of the progress of Nations, <cite>We hereby declare this system of
-Government to be adopted by Us</cite>, whilst holding strict
-account of the laws of the Cheri and the customs of Our
-people.) No one who casts a glance at the causes
-of the critical condition of affairs to‐day, can fail to
-recognise among the various and numerous factors two
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">107</a></span>principal ones, viz. the non‐observance of the strict laws
-of the Cheri, and the capricious and wilful actions of
-men. If the disorganisation that has for some time
-reigned in the affairs of State has latterly greatly increased;
-if our financial operations no longer inspire confidence;
-if our Courts of Justice no longer command respect, if
-Our Empire, with its vast capacities for commerce,
-industries and agriculture, and of every kind of progress,
-has profited by none of these things&mdash;if, in fine, all the
-efforts that have been made to insure liberty and peace
-for Our subjects have remained fruitless, this comes from
-the non‐observance of the laws and regulations; hence the
-necessity, whilst pursuing the noble object of assuring the
-happiness of Our subjects of commencing in the first
-place by the strict observation of existing laws, and of
-those which shall be elaborated and proclaimed in strict
-accordance with the laws of the Cheri and the wants of
-Our subjects, and by keeping a strict eye on the expenditure
-and revenues of the State, in order so to gain public
-confidence. (Each administrative department, therefore,
-must act prudently and abstain from useless expenses;
-and likewise with respect to the Household and other
-expenses of the Imperial Palaces, these shall be diminished
-and reduced to what is strictly necessary; and the Civil
-list of the Princes of the Imperial family shall also be
-reduced, and their amount shall be paid directly by the
-Minister of the Finances; and We make over to this
-same Minister, as reduction from our Own Civil list, the
-sum of £300,000, and We hereby fix the expenses of our
-Palace at the sum of £30,000 per month).</p>
-
-<p>“The necessity of convoking a general assembly
-compatible with the habits and customs and capacity of
-Our population being more and more recognised and felt,
-Our Ministers will carefully and minutely study this
-question and submit their report on the subject to Our
-sanction. (In order to elaborate the Constitutional laws
-in conformity with the needs of Our population and their
-customs and usages and the law of the Cheri, We
-command our Ministers of State, the learned doctors of
-the law, and all those whose knowledge and experience
-can contribute to the perfection of the common work
-to unite in Council to express their opinions on the
-subject, and that on their report being approved by the
-Council of Ministers, it shall be submitted for Our approbation.)
-Further, the confusion in the affairs of State, result<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">108</a></span>ing
-as it does from the incapacity of certain functionaries
-in their posts, and from the frequent and unnecessary
-changes in the personnel, it is Our desire that from
-the present time, according to their different ranks, all
-office‐holders shall be chosen according to their merit
-and capacity, and shall be irremovable without serious
-reason, and that each of these shall be responsible for
-the proper execution of his allotted duties. Moreover, Our
-attention is directed to the question of public instruction,
-and seeing that European nations have acquired the
-prosperity that they enjoy by means of public instruction,
-We desire that all Our subjects, without distinction of
-classes, shall be able to profit by the benefits of knowledge,
-each according to his personal capacity; (and in order that
-the progress of the country may produce the happiness
-of all its subjects alike, and in order to inculcate these
-ideas, We decree the foundation of schools in which
-instruction and education shall be common to all), and
-with this object We desire that the credits allotted to
-public education shall be increased, in order that without
-loss of time we may endeavour to realise this programme.
-In order, too, that the civil and financial administration
-of the Provinces may be restored to their normal condition,
-We must without loss of time endeavour to institute an
-organisation in the Provinces resembling as much as
-possible the Central organisation.</p>
-
-<p>“(It is also absolutely necessary that the laws regulating
-the levying of tithes, taxes and indirect contributions
-shall be placed on a just and equitable basis, and all
-Our efforts will be directed to prevent any derogation or
-abuse in the execution of these laws. The buying
-and selling of slaves being contrary to the prescriptions
-of the Sacred Law (Cheri), We hereby enfranchise
-the slaves and eunuchs of Our Palace, and declare that
-henceforth all trade in slaves, whether purchase or sale,
-is hereby formally forbidden in Our Empire, and a date
-will be fixed for the gradual emancipation of all existing
-slaves, and special measures will be adopted to prevent
-any return of slavery.)</p>
-
-<p>“Since last year, owing to malevolent instigations,
-Bosnia and Herzegovnia have been in a state of insurrection,
-and the revolt of Servia is now added as an outcome
-of this insurrection, so that the blood of the children of our
-common country is being spilt. The continuation of such
-a state of things is a subject of profound sorrow to Us,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">109</a></span>and Our most sincere desire is to put an end to it by the
-employment of the most energetic measures.</p>
-
-<p>“Our treaties with foreign Powers having been renewed
-and recognised by Us, it will be Our aim to cultivate
-still further the friendly relations already existing with
-them.</p>
-
-<p>“May the Almighty, our common Ruler and Master,
-grant through His mercy and goodness, success to our
-efforts.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>Saturday</i>, 22 <i>Chaban</i>, 1292, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-
-<span class="h">xxxxxx</span>(9<i>th September</i> 1876.)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p>The points of contention between the Palace, or the
-Sultan (which now become synonymous expressions), and
-Midhat were all contained in germ in the foregoing
-variations in the first speech from the throne.</p>
-
-<p>(1) In the very first sentence of the Hatti Humayun
-of inauguration the Sultan had cut out a passage which
-would have introduced a change to which Midhat attached
-some importance&mdash;“my Grand Vizier with the title of
-Prime Minister.” Midhat desired to abolish the title
-of Grand Vizier and to substitute for it that of Prime
-Minister, a change which would have entailed as a
-consequence the collective, instead of the individual,
-responsibility of Ministers. What the first Minister would
-lose in dignity and personal influence would be acquired
-by the Ministry collectively, and would thus consolidate
-the component parts of the Constitution. Midhat was well
-aware that this post of Prime Minister would require
-strengthening and developing for some time in Turkey, in
-view of the power and influence which the Throne derived
-from the very nature of the traditions and sentiments of
-the Ottomans, and the position of Islam in the world.</p>
-
-<p>The purport and tendency of the proposal did not
-escape the new sovereign, and, faithful to his own views
-and interests, he simply cancelled the sentence and
-rejected the proposal.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">110</a></span></p>
-
-<p>(2) Midhat had placed in the mouth of the Sultan the
-following phrase: “As the Constitutional system is one
-of the principal causes of the progress of nations, we
-hereby declare this system of government to be adopted
-by Us, whilst holding, etc.”&mdash;instead of which, after some
-colourless commonplace sentences about the non‐observance
-of laws and regulations and pursuing the noble object
-of assuring the happiness of our subjects, he speaks of
-the necessity of convoking “a general Assembly compatible
-with the habits and customs and capacity of
-our population” (which might mean anything or nothing
-according to the estimate of their capacity), and he orders
-his Ministers carefully and minutely to study this question
-(which they had done for a year past), and submit the
-report to his sanction.</p>
-
-<p>(3) In connection with the same important subject
-Midhat had proposed, for the purpose of elaborating the
-Constitutional laws, the convention of a Grand Council
-composed of the Ministers of State, the Doctors of the
-Law, and all those whose knowledge and experience
-entitled them to a voice in the country, to express their
-opinion on the subject, and that on their report being
-revised by the Council of Ministers it should be submitted
-to the approbation of the Sultan.</p>
-
-<p>This proposal evidently meant business, and would
-not only have fixed a limit of time for the inauguration
-of the new Constitution, but would have given it the
-<em>imprimatur</em> of all that was enlightened and worthy of
-respect and attention in the empire. The Sultan
-rejected the sentence <em>in toto</em>.</p>
-
-<p>(4) Midhat, who was deeply concerned by the actual
-condition of Turkish Finances, and thoroughly convinced
-that the first step in setting this right must be the exercise
-of rigid economy in all branches of the administration,
-and who, moreover, had experience of all that had taken<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">111</a></span>
-place in the reign of Abdul Aziz, did not hesitate to
-propound to Abdul Hamid what his predecessor Murad
-had unhesitatingly accepted, viz., that the expenses of
-the household and of the Imperial Palace should be
-diminished and reduced to what was strictly necessary, and
-the Civil list of the princes of the Imperial family
-should be in like manner reduced, and their amount
-paid directly by the Minister of Finance, and he
-left it to the sovereign to make over a sum that
-he should fix himself for the monthly expenses of the
-Palace.</p>
-
-<p>The Sultan omitted the whole paragraph.</p>
-
-<p>(5) Midhat attached the greatest importance to the
-question of mixed schools in the provinces where Christians
-and Mussulmans lived together. The reader will recollect
-(p. 40) that when Governor of the provinces of the
-Danube he desired to establish this system in Bulgaria,
-and it was this very proposal which excited the anxiety
-and stirred the energies of the vigilant Ignatieff to defeat
-the proposal and obtain the dismissal of the Vali.</p>
-
-<p>The Governor of Bulgaria&mdash;who now became for the
-second time the Grand Vizier of the empire&mdash;desired to
-make this cherished scheme general in all the provinces
-of the empire, and in the inaugural speech he had placed
-in the Sultan’s mouth words that signified the adoption
-of this measure and its inauguration in the empire, “in
-order that the progress of the country may produce the
-happiness of all its subjects alike; and in order to
-inculcate these ideas, <cite>We decree the foundation of these
-schools</cite>, in which instruction and education shall be
-common to all.”</p>
-
-<p>Instead of this categorical declaration the Sultan
-substituted the colourless proposal: “We desire that all
-Our subjects, without distinction of classes, shall be able to
-profit by the benefits of knowledge, each according to his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">112</a></span>
-personal capacity,” which will bear the exact sense that
-anybody may choose to attribute to it.</p>
-
-<p>We shall very shortly see what practical sense the
-Sultan himself attributed to it.</p>
-
-<p>(6) Midhat desired to abolish the slave trade, which
-he considered a scandal and a disgrace to the empire, and
-incompatible with its pretensions to a high place in the
-ranks of civilised nations. He proposed, therefore, in this
-inaugural speech to proclaim its abolition, and that the
-Sultan should inaugurate the change by enfranchising all
-the slaves in the Palace. The Sultan cut out the whole
-paragraph.</p>
-
-<p>With such a radical difference in the whole point of
-view from which the Palace clique and the new Grand
-Vizier regarded the situation, it was clear that occasions
-for serious conflict would not be wanting, nor would be
-long in manifesting themselves. They arose indeed at
-once, and it will be seen that each subject of contention
-was implicitly contained in the divergence of views manifested
-with reference to the speech from the throne that
-has just been analysed.</p>
-
-<p>The question of the Constitution naturally occupied
-the foreground in these disputes. The Sultan, as has been
-seen, refused to submit its provisions to a Grand Council
-to be summoned <em>ad hoc</em>, lest it should receive, as it
-undoubtedly would have received, this important sanction.
-He preferred that Ministers should be its sole sponsors,
-which would leave him free to deny subsequently that its
-details had been stamped with the seal of national approval.
-From the very first days of his accession he had shown the
-greatest anxiety on this subject of the Constitution, and no
-wonder: it was what the Magna Charta was to John of
-England&mdash;the curb and limit of arbitrary power and
-exaction.</p>
-
-<p>Knowing that Midhat was its chief champion, it was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">113</a></span>
-with him that he entered into negotiations on the subject,
-even before the actual resignation of Mehemet Rushdi
-Pasha. The following significant letter signed with his
-own name (instead of through the usual vehicle of the
-First Secretary’s signature) was the warning shot fired
-across the enemy’s bows:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center"><small><cite>Letter addressed by the Sultan to Midhat Pasha on the
-eve of his Grand Vizierate.</cite><a name="FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor">12</a><br /><br />
-
-“<i>To my illustrious Vizier, Midhat Pasha</i>.</small></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“We have made ourselves acquainted with the Constitution
-which you unofficially forwarded to us, and we
-have noticed in it passages incompatible with the habits
-and aptitudes of the nation. Our desire is to assure the
-future of the country by just administration, and we cannot
-but appreciate all efforts towards that end. And one of
-the objects to which we attach much importance is that of
-<cite>safeguarding the Sovereign rights</cite> by a new organisation
-drawn up with regard to the needs of the people. We
-desire therefore that the Constitution should be discussed
-by the Council of Ministers, and should be revised in the
-manner referred to above. Communicate our greetings to
-our Grand Vizier and show him this order. In any case
-we expect from your patriotism that your efforts shall
-tend towards the object we have in view, and demand
-that this Irade shall be kept secret between our Grand
-Vizier and yourself.</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Abdul Hamid</span></p>
-
-<p><small>“9 <i>Zilkade</i>, 1293, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(25<i>th November</i> 1876.)</small></p></div>
-
-<p class="center"><small><i>Reply.</i><br /><br />
-
-<i>To the First Secretary of His Majesty.</i><a name="FNanchor_12a_12a" id="FNanchor_12a_12a"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor">12</a></small></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Excellency</span>,&mdash;As it was impossible for me to thank
-His Majesty for the favours and the many proofs of
-goodwill with which he overwhelms me every day and
-every moment, I am entirely unable to testify my gratitude
-for the signal honour, so disproportionate to my
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">114</a></span>deserts, which I have received in the reply of an autograph
-letter from His Majesty, inviting me to furnish
-certain explanations of the text of the Constitution
-unofficially forwarded to His Majesty. As to the contents
-of the report which has been submitted, I myself also
-recognise that the majority of the articles require to be
-modified and changed, and I think it is not necessary to
-say that if this text has been submitted to His Majesty
-as an incomplete rough draft, it was simply with the
-intention of correcting it later according to the views and
-wishes of His Majesty. This report has been drawn up
-and completed by the Commission convened for the
-purpose by Imperial command, and, as the time has
-come when the text should be studied by the Council of
-Ministers, the terms of the Imperial Irade have been
-communicated to His Highness the Grand Vizier. Now,
-urged by fidelity to my Sovereign and my love for my
-country, I feel it incumbent upon me, and have the
-courage to be of opinion that there are two methods
-of extrication from our present position. The first
-consists in putting into execution, before the meeting
-of the Conference, the reforms for our home government
-that were promised and proclaimed to all the Powers, and
-the time needed for so doing would be three or four
-days at the outside. The second method is to accept
-the proposals formulated by the Powers, and to make
-up our minds to live henceforth and for ever under their
-tutelage. If the first method is not adopted, or even if its
-promulgation is delayed and retarded until after the
-meeting of the Conference, the second becomes inevitable.
-My attachment to my Sovereign and my love for my
-country force me to give utterance to these ideas.<br />
-<span class="h">xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</span>“I am....</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“11 <i>Zilkade</i>, 1293, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(27<i>th November</i> 1876.)</small><br /><br /></p></div>
-
-<p>The inner meaning of the words “safeguarding the
-Sovereign rights” contained the pith and kernel of the
-conspirators’ views and intentions. It had direct
-reference to a clause which the Sultan desired to have
-inserted in the text of the Constitution, or rather (and
-the difference is very material) to a rider which he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">115</a></span>
-desired to be added to a clause (the 113th), referring
-to the declaration of a state of siege in disturbed
-districts. The purport and intention of the clause would
-naturally govern its different branches. It could not
-possibly be supposed to apply to Ministers themselves,
-inasmuch as the Constitution specially and elaborately
-provided for their trial and punishment in clauses 31, 32,
-and 34 of the text. In spite, however, of the provisions
-and safeguards which were to hedge and limit the exercise
-of this prerogative, Midhat had long combated the
-insertion of this rider to the 113th article. Anxious above
-all things, however, to get the Constitution promulgated not
-later than the first sitting of the Conference, and not as
-yet fully grasping the character of the man he was dealing
-with, he listened to the explanations and glosses offered
-with reference to this rider, and finally, though reluctantly,
-consented to its insertion in the text of the Constitution.</p>
-
-<p>It is easy to see now that this was the second error
-of tactics committed by Midhat. “Put not your trust in
-princes” is an especially wise injunction when you do not
-know the character of the princes you are dealing with.
-If Midhat had forced the Sultan Hamid&mdash;as he might have
-done, if he had been less trustful and more strenuous&mdash;to
-observe strictly the terms of the treaty of Muslou‐Oglou
-that Prince Hamid had agreed to as a condition
-of his mounting on the throne at all, Midhat would never
-have been banished, and the Constitution would never
-have been strangled. Good men are rarely as determined
-and strenuous as bad men. It is a pity, for half
-the political ills of the world come from this weakness
-on their part.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">116</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER V<br /><br />
-
-<small>SECOND GRAND VIZIERATE OF MIDHAT PASHA</small></h2>
-
-<p>On 19th December 1876, three months after the accession
-of Abdul Hamid to the throne, Midhat was appointed
-Grand Vizier. His nomination to this post was again
-welcomed with great rejoicing in Turkey, and gave
-Europe generally hopes of the accomplishment of some
-reforms. Sir Henry Elliot addressed the following
-despatch to Lord Derby:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center"><small>“<i>Sir H. Elliot to the Earl of Derby</i>.</small></p>
-
-<p class="right padr2"><small>“<span class="smcap">Constantinople</span>, 19<i>th December</i> 1876.
-</small></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">My Lord</span>,&mdash;Midhat Pasha has been appointed Grand
-Vizier in the place of Mehemet Rushdi Pasha. The
-importance of this appointment at this moment is very
-great. Midhat Pasha is beyond question the most
-energetic and liberal of the Turkish statesmen, and a
-man of action, although his decisions are sometimes
-hasty.</p>
-
-<p>“He has always advocated the equality of Mussulmans
-and Christians, and wishes for a constitutional control
-over the power of the Grand Vizier as well as of the
-Sultan. He is opposed to centralisation, and in favour
-of giving the provincial populations much control over
-their local affairs.</p>
-
-<p>“He has at times spoken strongly to me against the
-grant of special institution in the Slav Provinces; but he
-is a man who listens to argument, and may, perhaps, be
-brought to see the necessity of it under the present
-circumstances.</p>
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">117</a></span>
-<p>“He is disliked by the old Mussulman party, but is
-regarded as the hope of the Mussulman reformers and of
-the Christians.</p>
-
-<p>“He used formerly always to wish to follow the advice
-of Her Majesty’s Government, but I am not aware what
-his feelings towards England are at this moment.<a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor">13</a><br />
-<span class="h">xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</span>“I have....</p>
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Henry Elliot</span>.”</p></div>
-
-<p>Midhat pointed out to the Sultan, in a letter addressed
-to Saïd, the danger of the delay and procrastination
-that would be caused by too prolonged discussion on the
-text of the Constitution; further, that the text which
-had been submitted to the Sultan was such as had been
-decided upon by the Commission appointed by His
-Majesty himself, and that that text, after having been
-submitted to His Majesty as it came from the hands
-of the Commission, was now, together with His Majesty’s
-observations on it, being considered by the Ministers as a
-final stage, requiring at most three or four days’ deliberation,
-and that any longer delay before its actual promulgation
-would assuredly raise in the minds of the friendly
-Powers a doubt as to the sincerity of the Turkish
-Government in the work of the reform; and he insisted,
-finally, that, in order to convince them of this sincerity,
-it was essentially desirable that the promulgation of
-the Constitution should take place before the date fixed
-for the assembly of the Conference.</p>
-
-<p>At the very first Ministerial Council under Midhat’s
-presidency as Grand Vizier, held at the house of
-Mahmoud Damad&mdash;a significant circumstance in itself&mdash;the
-conspirators showed their hand. When the subject of
-the Constitution and its promulgation came under discussion,
-Djevdet Pasha, Minister for Justice, and Mahmoud’s
-man, who had hitherto been “lying low” awaiting
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">118</a></span>
-developments, suddenly sprang upon his colleagues the
-proposal that the whole question of the Constitution
-should be indefinitely adjourned, on the pretext that
-with the change that had taken place in the occupancy
-of the throne it was no longer necessary. The indignation
-and wrath of Midhat can easily be imagined at the
-audacity and perversity of this audacious proposition; he
-apostrophised his colleague in no sparing terms, and
-pointed out to him that the sole ground and justification
-of the solemn act of deposition to which they had
-lent their countenance was the necessity of having the
-Constitution promulgated; and he made Djevdet and
-Mahmoud, and any other weak‐kneed colleague who
-might be inclined to support their views, very clearly
-understand that he would throw up his office and retire
-into private life if the slightest hesitation was shown
-on their part with respect to this essential matter. By
-this uncompromising firmness he dispelled any illusion
-that might have been harboured that a frontal attack on
-the Constitution, with Midhat at the helm, could be of
-any avail, and the opposition feigned acquiescence in the
-Grand Vizier’s views. The incident, however, was not
-the less significant, and ought to have warned Midhat
-of what was secretly preparing in the councils of the
-conspirators.</p>
-
-<p>It has been said, among other equally groundless and
-disingenuous criticisms, that “Midhat’s Constitution,” as
-it has been called, was a simple device to defeat the
-Conference that was about to assemble. One single
-fact, vouched for on an authority that will not be disputed,
-absolutely disposes of this calumny. Sir Henry
-Elliot, referring to these very matters, distinctly says that
-Midhat Pasha and his friends had informed him that they
-were working for the promulgation of a Constitution, and
-explained their views fully to him, twelve months before<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">119</a></span>
-there was any question of a conference at all: “This
-was more than a year before its promulgation, when it was
-declared to have been invented to defeat the Conference
-then sitting at Constantinople!”<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor">14</a></p>
-
-<p>That Midhat and his friends used the fact of the
-promulgation as a weapon to oppose the decisions of
-the Conference is likely enough; but this was perfectly
-fair dealing, and a legitimate weapon to make use of.
-Another proposition which is not true, and is proved to
-have been false, is that the Constitution was invented for
-the purpose of defeating the Conference. It is abundantly
-evident that if there had been no Conference at all, the
-Constitution would none the less have been elaborated and
-its promulgation insisted on.</p>
-
-<p>Another disingenuous and captious criticism passed
-on the Constitution by its enemies is the implication
-contained in the expression “Midhat’s Constitution,” as
-if it was a “one‐man’s” Constitution, and not the work
-of what may be called the national mind&mdash;that is, the
-majority of the best minds in it. That Midhat had a
-great deal to say in its elaboration, and still more in its
-promulgation, in spite of the unconcealed opposition of
-the Sultan, and the Palace, and the whole phalanx of
-reaction behind them, there can of course be no doubt
-whatever, and to his eternal honour be it said; but that
-it was a “one‐man’s” work, in the sense that it was not
-the expression of the wants and wishes of the nation,
-is disproved by all the circumstances connected with it.
-Chakir Effendi, one of its warmest partisans, was one of
-the most learned, distinguished and highly esteemed Ulema
-at Constantinople; it was he who headed a deputation of
-Ulemas and doctors of the law, to congratulate Midhat
-immediately after the ceremony of promulgation was
-over. The most enthusiastic champions of both Midhat
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">120</a></span>and the Constitution were the Softas, or body of students,
-numbering several thousands, of all the <em>medresses</em> (schools
-and universities) in Constantinople, the future generation
-of the educated mind of the nation. The provinces, without
-exception, were in favour of it. The important city
-of Adrianople sent a congratulatory address to Midhat,
-which the Sultan would not allow to be published in the
-papers. The instinct of the masses looked upon it as
-the one resource in the dire straits of the nation. The
-very fact that, with an opposing Sultan clinging to his
-“sovereign rights,” and a bitterly hostile and determined
-Palace clique, and in spite of all the means at the disposal
-of Turkey’s nearest and most powerful neighbour unscrupulously
-put into action, the Constitution ever saw
-the daylight, and actually lived for a twelvemonth in such
-an environment, is the very strongest evidence that can
-possibly be adduced of its inherent vitality, and an undeniable
-proof that it was something more than a “one‐man’s”
-Constitution.</p>
-
-<p>The Constitution, although the principal, was not the
-only subject of contention between the new Sultan and
-his Vizier. There were questions of persons, questions
-of money, questions of education that divided them irreconcilably.
-The Sultan, who had no doubt fixed on
-Edhem Pasha as the pliable instrument that he would
-need after the Conference was over, and when the work
-of getting rid of Midhat had to be gone through, desired
-to elevate one who, in his opinion, “was not quite the
-person for a very high position,” to a post whence
-subsequent promotion to the very highest position would
-seem a little less incongruous. He accordingly selected
-Edhem Pasha for the post of President of the Council
-of State, the important office concerned with the elaboration
-of the laws of the country. Midhat’s candidate was
-Sadik Pasha, whose competency was beyond dispute.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">121</a></span>
-Damad Mahmoud Djelaleddin wished to have Djevdet
-Pasha, his faithful henchman&mdash;whom we have already
-seen at work&mdash;nominated to this post, but even the
-Sultan thought his knowledge and intellectual capacity
-altogether too circumscribed. The accompanying letter
-shows the strong insistence of the Sultan on his own
-intention. He had the great advantage over Midhat
-which conspirators always have, viz., of having his plan
-of campaign with a distinct aim already settled, and
-knowing therefore beforehand the strong position which
-it was necessary to occupy on the field of battle.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat, ignorant of the game that was being played,
-sacrificed point after point in it, considering their importance
-with reference to public affairs secondary to that of
-having the Constitution promulgated as soon as possible.</p>
-
-<p>The following letter makes these points clear:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center"><small><i>To Midhat Pasha, Grand Vizier.</i></small></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Highness</span>,&mdash;After you had left the Palace, His Majesty
-sent for me and questioned me as to the cause of the
-delay in the nomination of Edhem Pasha as President of
-the Council of State. I told His Majesty that the Irade
-(order) relative to that appointment had been communicated
-to your Highness yesterday, and that probably the
-visit of the French Envoy to your Highness was the
-cause of the delay in my receiving an answer to the
-communication, and I told His Majesty that the only
-motive of your opposition to the appointment was the
-incapacity of Edhem Pasha to fulfil the duties of a post
-to which were confided the constitutional functions of
-elaborating the laws; that as for Sadik Pasha, whom you
-proposed for that post, there could be no doubt that his
-nomination would add a useful person to the Ministerial
-Councils. At that moment Damad Mahmoud Djelaleddin
-was called in, and he expressed the same opinion, but proposed
-that Djevdet Pasha should be appointed President
-of the Council, and that Edhem Pasha, whose incompetency
-you objected to, might fill the post of Minister of
-Justice. On this His Majesty made the following declaration:
-‘I am not acquainted with Edhem Pasha, in spite
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">122</a></span>of his services to my father, but I have now learned to
-appreciate his abilities; I intend therefore to profit by
-everybody’s capacities, and <em>although Edhem Pasha is not
-quite the person to occupy a very high position</em>, I think
-nevertheless he is capable of performing the duties of
-President of the Council of State. The knowledge and
-learning of Djevdet Pasha are very limited, whereas the
-accomplishments and capacity of Edhem Pasha are great
-in comparison with his. In a word, I shall be glad if His
-Highness the Grand Vizier will acquiesce in my wishes,
-and will to‐morrow propose his nomination to me. Write
-and tell him so.’ This is the reason why I have written
-at length to you on the subject.&mdash;I have the honour to be,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Saïd</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“6 <i>Zilhidje</i>, 1293, 1 <i>o’clock, Hegira</i>.”<br />
-<span class="h">xxxx</span>(22<i>nd December</i> 1876.)</small>
-<br /><br /></p></div>
-
-<p>Another and still more serious difference of opinion,
-relative to persons, arose concerning Zia Bey. This
-person, one of the most distinguished litterateurs and
-poets Turkey possessed, who had been appointed private
-Secretary of the Sultan Murad, and whose nomination
-to the same post by the present Sultan had been made
-an article of the treaty between Midhat and Prince
-Hamid at Muslou‐Oglou, was suspected of inspiring
-certain articles in the Turkish paper <cite>Istikbal</cite> which threw
-doubts on the Sultan’s sincerity with reference to the
-Constitution. These articles gave great offence at the
-Palace, and were considered of dangerous tendency. The
-Sultan determined not only to proceed against the paper,
-but also to remove Zia Bey, at any price, from the capital.</p>
-
-<p>The accompanying letter will show the feelings of the
-Sultan on the subject:</p>
-
-<p class="center2"><small><i>To Midhat Pasha.</i></small></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Highness</span>,&mdash;The Imperial Irade (written order) relative
-to the nomination of Zia Bey to the post of Ambassador
-at Berlin, was communicated to your Highness yesterday
-evening, and His Majesty has just asked me if the proposed
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">123</a></span>
-nomination had arrived, and on my reply in the
-negative His Majesty ordered me to insist upon it, adding
-the following observation: ‘Zia Bey is very ambitious,
-and if he had known how to profit by this quality with a
-view to his advancement and his future, he would have
-succeeded in obtaining a post here suited to his capacity;
-but this person has never yet shown any stability of
-character or fixity of purpose, and when anything occurs
-contrary to his views and wishes, he is in the habit of
-weaving intrigues in the matter, which is not favourable to
-his prolonged sojourn in Constantinople. His removal,
-moreover, from the capital cannot but facilitate for the
-Grand Vizier the exercise of his functions in freeing him
-from this kind of obstacle. These observations of mine
-are no exaggerations; but if on the one hand Zia Bey’s
-individual merit is only mediocre, the people are naturally
-attracted by these critics and attend to their criticisms,
-and in this way lend an importance to these polemics
-which they do not intrinsically deserve. As for the
-despatch of Zia Bey to Berlin, the Government is resolved
-to take the same steps at Berlin as it has determined to
-take at Paris, London, and Vienna, and to endeavour to
-gain the sympathies of Prince Bismark (<i>sic</i>), and if Zia
-Bey succeed in this, he will have shown his <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">savoir faire</i>,
-earned the gratitude of the State, and by the fact itself
-shown his aptitude for foreign affairs, and then his further
-promotion will be justified. Moreover, his selection will
-provoke no opposition on the part of the Court of Berlin.’
-On account of these considerations His Majesty orders
-this nomination to be submitted to him as soon as
-possible. It is, moreover, by Imperial command that I
-have written to you at such length on the subject, and
-have repeated what has already been said; and His
-Majesty desires that you will carry out these injunctions
-by to‐morrow at the audience you will have with His
-Majesty.</p>
-
-<p class="center">“I have the honour to be,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Saïd</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“12 <i>Zilhidje</i>, 1293, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(28<i>th December</i> 1876.)</small><br /><br /></p></div>
-
-<p>In the meantime the population of Constantinople,
-who have been represented by interested critics as indifferent
-about the Constitution and reform, hearing of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">124</a></span>
-proposed exile of this champion of the Constitution and
-reform, determined to prevent his departure from the
-capital by electing him as one of their representatives
-in the new Parliament. Consternation is not too strong
-a term to describe the feelings that this proposal excited
-in the Palace. Zia Bey had an influence among the people
-of the capital. What if his presence among them in the
-Parliament should checkmate all the plans of a carefully
-hatched conspiracy? The following letter clearly reveals
-this consternation:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center"><small><i>To Midhat Pasha, Grand Vizier.</i></small></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Highness</span>,&mdash;His Majesty has just read in the paper
-<cite>Istikbal</cite> that the population of Constantinople have
-decided to elect Zia Bey as their representative, and that
-a petition signed by several thousand persons will be
-addressed to the Palace with a view of retaining Zia Bey
-in the capital. Thereupon His Majesty declared categorically
-that the candidature of Zia Bey as deputy was
-not acceptable; that numerous acts proved the participation
-of Zia Bey in acts against his Sovereign; that the constitution
-forbade the entry into Parliament of individuals
-compromised in any way.<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor">15</a></p>
-
-<p>“‘It is to be observed that this person has had recourse
-to various methods, including the intervention of the Press
-and other contrivances, to gain popularity for himself.
-Although these proceedings have constituted no claim
-on his part for favourable consideration from the Government,
-the rank of Vizier has been conferred upon him,
-and the post of Governor‐General in one of the most
-important vilayets, viz., Syria, simply in order to comply
-with the request of the Grand Vizier. But Zia Bey, far
-from exhibiting any gratitude, has sought more than ever
-to exercise an influence in the Capital, through his position
-as Vizier, by announcing in the <cite>Istikbal</cite> that he is one of
-the originators of the Constitution, which was, in fact,
-promulgated by our desire with the co‐operation of a few
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">125</a></span>patriots. We have consequently directed the Grand Vizier
-to proceed against Zia Bey in such matter as may seem
-proper to him.’ Such was the declaration of His Majesty.
-His Majesty further criticised the action of the <cite>Istikbal</cite>,
-which, without reason, has just published the famous
-letter of Mustafa Fazil Pasha, and calls your attention to
-the fact of that paper, though suspended indefinitely, having
-reappeared. His Majesty considers it urgent to find means
-to put an end to such doings in the Press.</p>
-
-<p class="center">“I have the honour to be</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Saïd</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“24 <i>Zilhidje</i>, 1293, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(9<i>th January</i> 1877.)</small><br /><br /></p></div>
-
-<p>As the concluding passage of this letter shows, the
-Sultan, whilst banishing Zia Bey, determined, <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">pour
-encourager les autres</i>, to proceed with all possible vigour
-against the Press. There was to be no faltering in so
-grave a matter. For this purpose the <cite>Istikbal</cite> was to be
-suspended, and a Draconian law against the Press prepared
-“within three or four days,” although by Article 12 of the
-Constitution this matter ought to have been left to be
-dealt with by the Parliament.</p>
-
-<p>The following letters speak for themselves:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center"><small><i>To Midhat Pasha, Grand Vizier.</i></small></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Highness</span>,&mdash;His Majesty, after having made the
-remark to me that the contents of the article ‘The
-Future of Islam,’ published by the <cite>Vakit</cite>, and especially
-the words underlined, were calculated to lead astray public
-opinion, and referring to an interview with your Highness
-yesterday evening on the subject of the Press, orders
-your Highness to inform him of the measures you
-intend to take against the Editor of this particular paper,
-for having published facts calculated to make a bad impression,
-and, moreover, to propose to him a competent
-person ... as Director of the Bureau of the Press, in
-the place of the present functionary, who has been guilty
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">126</a></span>of inattention and negligence, and must be nominated to
-some other post.</p>
-
-<p>“As the Press, basing its pretensions on the liberty it
-enjoys under the Constitution, does not cease to publish
-all sorts of things, His Majesty, with a view to putting an
-end to abuses, and placing a curb on the license of the newspapers,
-commands your Highness to give the necessary
-orders in the proper quarter to complete within the delay
-of three or four days, the law on the Press, referred to
-in the Constitution.</p>
-
-<p class="center2">“I have the honour to be</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Saïd</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“15 <i>Zilhidje</i>, 1293, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(31<i>st December</i> 1876.)</small><br /><br /></p></div>
-
-<p class="center"><small><i>To Midhat Pasha, Grand Vizier.</i></small></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Highness</span>,&mdash;With reference to the measures to be
-taken against the Editor of the <cite>Vakit</cite>, I presented to His
-Majesty the note sent by your Honour last night on this
-subject. Whilst accepting the spirit of your observations,
-and even granting that the article in that paper was not
-in itself seditious, it is not the less a fact that that paper
-published, without any plausible justification, a statement
-to the effect that the <em>Fetva</em> of Sheik‐ul‐Islam is sufficient to
-depose a Sultan, a declaration calculated to prompt the
-people to a seditious movement, and to nullify the conditions
-and safeguards on which the promulgation of
-the <em>Fetva</em> depends, teaching the people that all power
-is attached to the individual will of the functionary who
-issues the <em>Fetva</em>. If such acts are tolerated, the papers
-will not fail to profit by the license, and to abuse it, and His
-Majesty orders that the Imperial Irade issued against the
-<cite>Vakit</cite> and its Editor shall be executed as soon as possible
-by way of example; the present law with respect to the
-Press being sufficient for this purpose. Further, the journal
-<cite>Istikbal</cite>, in its number of last Tuesday, published a long
-article to the effect that the delay in the promulgation of
-the Constitution, which was elaborated and ready for promulgation
-in his reign, had caused all kinds of ills, and
-this article corroborates the facts above referred to; and
-it is with a view to preventing the Press, either from
-ignorance or evil intention, from adopting a line of reasoning
-in contradiction to the views and intentions of His
-Majesty, that His Majesty commands me, with a view of
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">127</a></span>emphasising his views on the subject, to send you a copy
-of the incriminated article.</p>
-
-<p class="center2">“I have the honour to be,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Saïd</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“18 <i>Zilkidje</i>, 1293, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(2<i>nd January</i> 1877.)</small></p></div>
-
-<p>Two other subjects of grave difference were the cause
-of a good deal of fencing between Midhat and the Palace.
-The one was the position of Galib Pasha, Minister of
-Finance, whom Midhat was determined to remove from
-the post of Minister of Finance; the other had reference
-to mixed education in the State schools, a subject on
-which Midhat had always held very strong views. But
-as the foreign envoys in the capital were now demanding
-the convocation of the official meeting of the
-Conference, it was determined to postpone the final
-resolution on these subjects till after the Conference
-was over.</p>
-
-<p>The preliminary difficulties being at last overcome, or
-at least their discussion postponed till after the Conference
-was over, the date for the proclamation of the Constitution,
-with the Sultan’s famous rider inserted in the text,
-like the fatal gift of the evil fairy in the fable, was finally
-determined on.</p>
-
-<p>On the morning of the 23rd December, 1876, in the
-big open space in front of the Sublime Porte, facing
-the apartments reserved for the Sultan, a large platform
-was erected, profusely decorated with Turkish flags.
-Hither all the notabilities and Ulemas and Ministers
-were convoked to hear the promulgation of the new
-Constitution which, in the view of its promoters and
-supporters, was to inaugurate a new era for the sorely
-tried empire of the Osmanli. It might indeed have
-been a day marked in red, the greatest date in Turkish
-history. As it was, it was only the first act of a
-stupendous comedy.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">128</a></span></p>
-
-<p>The notabilities were now assembled, and in spite
-of a downpour of rain, an immense crowd of people came
-to witness and applaud the ceremony. The troops lined
-the road between Sirkedji and the Sublime Porte, and
-along it, at mid‐day. Saïd Pasha, the first Secretary to
-the Sultan, in full uniform, preceded by a military band,
-arrived at the Sublime Porte, bearing the Sultan’s letter
-(<em>Hatti Humayun</em>) of promulgation, addressed to the Grand
-Vizier Midhat Pasha, and the text of the Constitution.
-The letter ran as follows:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><em>Rescript</em> (<em>Hatti Humayun</em>) <i>of the Sultan promulgating
-the Ottoman Constitution</i>.</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">My Illustrious Grand Vizier, Midhat Pasha</span>,&mdash;The
-power of Our Empire was lately declining. Foreign
-affairs were not the cause of this, but men had strayed
-from the right path in the administration of home affairs,
-and the bonds that attached Our subjects to the Government
-had been relaxed. My august Father, the late
-Sultan, Abdul Medjid, granted a Charter of Reform, the
-<em>Tanzimat</em>, which guaranteed, in accordance with the sacred
-law of the Cheri, life, property, and honour to all.</p>
-
-<p>“It has been in consequence of the salutary effect
-of the <em>Tanzimat</em> that the State has, up to the present
-time, been able to maintain itself in security, and that
-We have been enabled to found and proclaim this day
-the Constitution which is the result of ideas and opinions
-fully expressed.</p>
-
-<p>“On this auspicious occasion I desire to recall with
-a feeling of special devotion the memory of My late
-august Father, who has been rightly considered the
-regenerator of his country. I doubt not that he would
-have himself inaugurated the Constitutional era that we
-are about to enter this day, if the period of the promulgation
-of the <em>Tanzimat</em> had been adapted to the necessities
-of our own times. But it has been to Our reign that
-Providence has reserved the task to accomplish this
-happy transformation, which is the supreme guarantee
-of the welfare of Our peoples. I thank Heaven for
-allowing me to be its instrument.</p>
-
-<p>“It is evident that the principle of our Government
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">129</a></span>had become incompatible with the successive modifications
-introduced into our internal organisation, and the increasing
-development of our foreign relations. Our most
-earnest desire is to cause the disappearance of all obstacles
-to the full enjoyment by the nation of all the natural
-resources it possesses, and, in a word, to see Our subjects
-put into the possession of rights which appertain to all
-civilised society, and to be united together in a common
-bond of progress, union, and concord.</p>
-
-<p>“In order to attain this object it was necessary
-to adopt a salutary regular organisation, to safeguard
-the inalienable rights of the Governing body by the
-abolition of faults and abuses of all kinds, <em>which result
-from illegality&mdash;that is to say, from the arbitrary power of
-one or more individuals</em>: to accord the same rights and
-to prescribe the same duties to all the members of the
-several communities composing our Society, and to enable
-them all to profit, without distinction, by the blessings
-of liberty, justice and equality&mdash;these being the only
-possible methods of guaranteeing and protecting the
-interests of all.</p>
-
-<p>“From these essential principles flows the necessity of
-another eminently useful work: viz., that of connecting
-Public Right with a deliberative and constitutional System.
-That is the reason why in the Hatt that We promulgated
-on Our accession to the Throne We declared the urgency
-of creating a Parliament.</p>
-
-<p>“A special Commission composed of the highest
-dignitaries, Ulemas and functionaries of the State, has
-carefully elaborated the basis of a Constitution, and this
-again has been studied and approved by Our Council of
-Ministers.</p>
-
-<p>“This fundamental Charter confirms the prerogatives
-of the Sovereign; the civil and political equality of
-Ottomans before the law; the responsibilities and duties of
-Ministers and Officials; the complete independence of the
-Tribunals; the efficient balancing of the Budget, and
-lastly, the decentralisation of provincial administration,
-whilst preserving the decisive action and the powers of the
-Central Government.</p>
-
-<p>“All these principles, <em>in strict conformity with the
-dispositions of the Cheri</em>, as well as to Our aptitude and
-aspirations, are equally in harmony with Our generous
-desire to assure the happiness and prosperity of all Our
-subjects, which is Our Supreme wish.</p>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">130</a></span></p>
-<p>“Confiding in the Divine Grace and in the intercession
-of the Prophet, I am now placing in your hand this
-Constitution after having invested it with My Imperial
-sanction. With the assistance of God, it will immediately
-be applied to all portions of Our Empire.</p>
-
-<p>“Therefore, it is My decided will that you shall
-publish it, and shall see that it shall be executed, from
-this day forth.</p>
-
-<p>“You must, moreover, take the promptest and most
-efficacious measures to proceed with the study and
-elaboration of the laws and regulations mentioned in this
-instrument.</p>
-
-<p>“May the Almighty deign to accord success to all
-those who work for the salvation of the Empire and the
-Nation.</p>
-
-<p>“Given this 7th of Zilhidje 1293, Hegira.”</p>
-
-<p class="center2 f09">(23<i>rd December</i> 1876.)</p></div>
-
-<p>The reading of the <cite>Hatti Humayun</cite> concluded, the
-First Secretary ceremoniously handed the Grand Vizier
-the text of the Constitution, after reverently raising it
-to his lips. The Grand Vizier received it with the like
-ceremony, and then handed it to the Grand Referendary,<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">16</a>
-Mahmoud Bey, who read it to the assembled people,
-while thousands of fly‐leaves bearing the text of the
-Constitution were distributed in all directions.</p>
-
-<p>After the text was read, Midhat made a speech, expressing
-gratitude to the Sultan for the graciousness of
-this act in promulgating the Constitution, the immense
-importance of which he proceeded to point out to the
-people. When he had concluded, the Mufti of Adrianople
-offered up a prayer, and all the people cried “Amen,” and
-a salute of 101 guns from the Seraskierate announced to
-the whole city that “the Constitution” was proclaimed.</p>
-
-<p>The Ulemas with the Sheik‐ul‐Islam (Hairullah Effendi)
-at their head; the Christian clergy with their patriarchs;
-the Ministers; the learned and distinguished Chakir Effendi,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">131</a></span>
-followed by the Softas and students; the representatives of
-all the corporations, and the populace of the capital, with
-flags bearing the inscription “Liberty,” came to congratulate
-Midhat, at his own residence, on the new era of liberty.
-In the evening the mosques were illuminated, and the
-people, carrying torches, paraded the streets, crying,
-“Long live the Sultan and Midhat Pasha!” Telegrams of
-congratulation were received from all the provinces of
-the Empire, expressing the joy felt at this great event.
-In short, the whole populace was in a state of rejoicing;
-the Palace of Bechiktashe was the only place not
-illuminated. The Sultan was indisposed.</p>
-
-<p>Although it was contrary to custom for a Grand
-Vizier to pay an official visit to the religious communities,
-Midhat Pasha went the following day to the Greek and
-Armenian Patriarchs and to the Jewish Chief Rabbi, to
-thank them for their expressions of rejoicing at the new
-Constitution. He was received with enthusiasm by the
-patriarchs, and the Christian populace threw flowers in
-his way. The Grand Vizier made speeches in which he
-declared that he recognised no distinctions between
-Mussulmans and Christians, as they were all children of
-the same country, urging that all should work together
-as brothers to promote the progress of their country,
-under one flag, and by the aid of the new liberty pronounced
-by His Majesty the Sultan.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">132</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER VI<br /><br />
-
-<small>THE CONFERENCE AND MIDHAT’S EXILE</small></h2>
-
-<p>The day fixed for the first plenary meeting of the
-Conference of Constantinople was the same as that
-chosen for the promulgation of the Constitution. That
-there was a purpose in the simultaneous occurrence of the
-two events admits of no doubt; but to conclude from that
-fact, as has been disingenuously argued, that the Constitution
-was a mere device to defeat the ends of the
-Conference, is, of course, absurd, and has been conclusively
-disproved.</p>
-
-<p>On the 23rd December (1876), accordingly, the envoys
-and plenipotentiaries of the Great Powers met in the
-handsome building of the Admiralty on the Golden
-Horn, in the large hall that had been prepared for
-their reception, to discuss with the Turkish envoys the
-condition of the Christian provinces of the empire.
-There were present, Count Zichy and Baron Calice
-representing Austro‐Hungary; Count Chaudordy and
-Count Bourgoing representing France; Baron Werther
-representing Germany; Lord Salisbury and Sir Henry
-Elliot representing Great Britain; General Ignatieff representing
-Russia, and Edhem Pasha and Safvet Pasha
-representing the Empire that was to be placed on the
-dissecting table.</p>
-
-<p>Scarcely had the preliminary formalities been concluded,
-when from across the Bosphorus, at the Seraskierate,
-was heard the booming of the first gun that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">133</a></span>
-announced the proclamation of the new Constitution.
-Thereupon a somewhat dramatic scene&mdash;that, no doubt,
-had been arranged beforehand&mdash;was enacted. Safvet
-Pasha arose in his place, and, addressing the assembled
-plenipotentiaries, said: “Gentlemen, the cannon that you
-hear across the Bosphorus notifies the commencement
-of the promulgation by His Majesty the Sultan of a
-Constitution guaranteeing equal rights and constitutional
-liberties to all the subjects of the Empire alike; and
-in the presence of this great event, I think our labours
-become superfluous.”</p>
-
-<p>This little speech of the Turkish Envoy was received
-by the assembly in chilling silence. The somewhat
-theatrical <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">coup</i> had evidently missed its effect. After
-a few moments’ dead silence, General Ignatieff moved
-that the Conference should proceed with the business of
-the day. The proceedings themselves were not lengthy.
-The envoys of the Great Powers had been a whole
-month in Constantinople holding unofficial meetings
-among themselves, from which the Turkish delegates were
-studiously excluded; and the programme to be followed
-and the policy to be enforced had all been arranged
-before the official meeting took place. The object of
-this somewhat unusual proceeding was clear. Turkey
-was to be given to understand that it had to do with
-a veritable Concert of Europe, which, however much it
-might minimise the demands made by one of the Powers
-interested, would insist unanimously on substantial concessions
-from the Porte, and that the latter must in consequence
-dismiss any hope or expectation of dissensions
-or jealousies breaking out between the Powers.</p>
-
-<p>The achievement of this unanimity was intended as
-the master‐stroke of Lord Salisbury’s policy. He did not
-imagine then, though he probably has realised it since,
-that the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">rôle</i> he was playing at Constantinople had been<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">134</a></span>
-carefully prepared for him at Vienna, and that the success
-of his efforts was simply the triumph of Count Andrassy’s
-policy. What remained for the Conference to do was,
-not to discuss measures, but to formulate decisions.
-There was, at any rate, this advantage in such a
-summary method: the agony would not be prolonged.
-The business of the Conference began, like a Dutch
-auction, with a maximum opening bid on the part of
-the Russian envoy. He proposed the autonomy of the
-province of Bulgaria, the appointment of a Christian
-Vali, the formation of a national militia, and the confinement
-of Turkish troops within the limits of certain fixed
-fortresses. The Turkish envoys having declared these
-proposals entirely inadmissible and beyond the sphere
-of discussion, the proposal was modified to what General
-Ignatieff designated “un minimum extrême et irreductible,”
-viz., that Bulgaria should be endowed with a special
-privileged government, and with an international commission
-to watch the administration, and that the appointment
-of its Governor should be submitted to the approval
-of the Great Powers. To this proposal, again, the Turkish
-envoys demurred, pointing out that the examples of Servia
-and Roumania, to which special privileged governments had
-been conceded with the other special arrangements now
-proposed for Bulgaria, were not encouraging precedents for
-a repetition of a similar experiment in Bulgaria: that the
-Mahomedan population in the above‐named States had
-not been treated with the equality and liberality promised
-and stipulated for, but had found themselves under the
-necessity of emigrating <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">en masse</i> from those countries, and
-that even the extreme concessions made to these States,
-removing all shadow of pretext for complaint, had not
-deterred them from joining the enemies of the Empire,
-or intriguing against it whenever the opportunity occurred.</p>
-
-<p>Eventually, after a heated and rather academical<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">135</a></span>
-passage of arms between Edhem Pasha and Count
-Chaudordy, a further modification was made in the
-proposals, but not without a protest from General Ignatieff,
-who said: “You are plucking all my feathers out of
-me,” to which Count Chaudordy replied, with pregnant
-truth, “You will always have plenty left, General.” The
-finally irreducible minimum proposed was to the effect
-that a Consular Commission should be appointed to aid
-the local authorities, and that the Valis of the three
-provinces, Bulgaria, Herzegovina and Bosnia, should be
-appointed subject to the assent of the Great Powers,
-during the first five years.</p>
-
-<p>The Turkish envoys, however, could not agree to this
-proposal either. They pointed out that the appointment
-of the Consular Commission was an infringement of the
-sovereign rights of the nation, <em>which it was beyond their
-competence to acquiesce in</em>, and that over and above this
-difficulty the proposal was open to the practical objection
-that an exceptional situation created for those provinces
-would cause discontent in all the other provinces of the
-empire, and lead to unrest, and probably disturbance, in
-some of them; and they again pointed out that the
-moment seemed singularly ill‐chosen for insisting on
-special privileges for a portion of the Empire, when the
-Sultan had just promulgated a charter containing the
-largest possible measure of liberty and equal rights to
-all his subjects without distinction throughout every
-portion of the Empire.</p>
-
-<p>This declaration of <em>non possumus</em> on the part of the
-Turkish delegates was followed by a most violent speech
-from General Ignatieff, immediately after which the
-assembly broke up without even listening to the protest
-that the Ottoman delegates were prepared to make to
-the speech of the Russian envoy.</p>
-
-<p>The last modified proposal was embodied in an<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">136</a></span>
-Ultimatum delivered to the Porte by the envoys
-collectively, to which an answer was required within a
-week. At the expiration of that time, if the answer was
-not satisfactory, they declared their intention of quitting
-Constantinople.</p>
-
-<p>On the news of what had occurred becoming known, the
-conduct of the Turkish delegates was generally approved
-of throughout the Empire. Christians and Mahomedans
-vied with each other in sending patriotic addresses to
-the capital, and a battalion of Christian volunteers was
-raised, at their own expense, and marched to the Servian
-frontier, where they distinguished themselves greatly, let
-it be said in passing, by their courage and devotion.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat, in the meantime, by the Sultan’s order, had
-convened a Grand Council of 237 persons, composed of
-all nationalities and notabilities, to whom the final propositions
-of the Conference were submitted.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat made a speech to the notabilities, in which
-he pointed out the consequences of the rejection of the
-terms in question, and told them clearly that unless
-they were prepared to face this <em>ultima ratio</em>, they had
-no alternative but to accept the terms of the Conference.
-After listening attentively to this speech, the Grand
-Council, by a practically unanimous vote, amidst very
-considerable enthusiasm decided on the rejection of the
-Ultimatum. The foreign envoys accordingly left the
-capital on 20th January (1877). So ended the Conference
-of Constantinople.</p>
-
-<p>It is necessary here to recall the fact that Midhat
-during the Conference sent the patriot Odian Effendi to
-London to communicate to Lord Derby the occurrence
-which had recently taken place in his country, and to
-add that as the Powers had not insisted on the carrying
-out of the proposals formulated by Russia, which
-were found to be impracticable in the present condition<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">137</a></span>
-of Turkey, it was hoped that the Powers would take
-the new Constitution under their protection, and see
-to its execution in practice. The following despatch from
-Lord Derby to Lord Salisbury and Sir H. Elliot shows
-the result of this step:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>The Earl of Derby to the Marquis of Salisbury and Sir H.
-Elliot.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p class="right f09">“<span class="smcap">Foreign Office</span>,<span class="h">xxx</span><br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>“10<i>th January</i> 1877.</p>
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">My Lord and Sir</span>,&mdash;Odian Effendi called upon me
-this afternoon by appointment, and spoke to me again
-of the impossibility which his Government felt of accepting
-the proposals made to them in the Conference.</p>
-
-<p>“There might, he said, be concessions on both sides
-in regard to the reforms, but the question of the guarantees
-would still remain, and offered insuperable difficulties.</p>
-
-<p>“Under these circumstances he was anxious to make
-a personal suggestion, which he thought might offer a
-mode of arrangement, and which he understood that
-Midhat Pasha was ready to adopt. It was that the
-Constitution recently decreed by the Sultan should be
-brought to the cognizance of the Powers in a form
-which should make its execution a matter of international
-obligation between the Porte and them, and that the
-organisation of the provincial administrations to be drawn
-up by the Turkish Ministers should, after receiving the
-approval of the Powers, be made a portion of the general
-plan, and embodied in the same agreement.</p>
-
-<p>“The whole system of reforms granted by the Sultan
-to his subjects would thus be placed under the guarantee
-of the Powers, who would have a right to watch over the
-manner in which it was carried out.</p>
-
-<p>“Odian Effendi wished to know whether this proposal
-would be favourably received by Her Majesty’s Government,
-and whether I thought there would be any use in
-the Porte bringing it forward in the Conference.</p>
-
-<p>“I told Odian Effendi in reply that there was a
-manifest inconvenience in discussing here the questions
-which at the same time were in process of negotiation at
-Constantinople. I must therefore refrain from expressing
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">138</a></span>an opinion upon the plan which he had mentioned to
-me.</p>
-
-<p>“If it was to be proposed by the Turkish Government,
-this must be done by them at Constantinople, and upon
-their own responsibility.<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor">17</a></p>
-
-<p class="center2">“I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Derby</span>.”<br />
-</p></div>
-
-<p>Hardly had the foreign envoys departed from the
-capital, and the doors of the great hall at the Admiralty
-been shut behind them, when the Palace proposed to put
-the match to the mine that had been carefully laid for the
-reformers.</p>
-
-<p>Within a fortnight of the departure of the Plenipotentiaries,
-matters were brought to a climax. Two
-subjects of contention between Midhat and the Sultan
-had been reserved for further discussion when the Conference
-should be over: the position of Galib Pasha and
-the question of mixed schools. Either would serve for a
-<em>casus belli</em>.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat had resolved on the dismissal of the complaisant
-Minister of Finance, who had, <em>proprio motu</em>,
-doubled the amount appropriated to the Civil list by the
-simple device of paying it in gold; there were other
-counts, too, against the Minister which necessitated this
-measure. One was the specific charge of irregularities in
-the accounts of the Treasury, which, although Midhat did
-not attribute them to malversation on his part, were nevertheless,
-in his opinion, proofs of great negligence in the
-supervision of the business of his office. The other was a
-general charge of incapacity as Minister of Finance,
-especially revealed in his tactless method of issuing
-Treasury bonds, thereby causing an excessive and alarming
-depreciation in the paper of the State. The Sultan
-had agreed to the dismissal of Galib, but he desired to
-have him forthwith appointed Senator, whereas Midhat
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">139</a></span>
-insisted on a preliminary examination of the accounts of
-his office. It will be perceived at once that there was a
-great deal more in this dispute than met the eye, and that
-it accounted for the bitterness of the feelings entertained
-against Midhat at the Palace. The following letter, if read
-between the lines, will throw some light on the questions at
-issue:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>To the First Secretary of His Majesty Saïd Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Excellency</span>,&mdash;By an Irade of our august Master,
-the nomination of his Excellency Galib Pasha as member
-of the Senate has just been adjourned. The delay on my
-part in making you acquainted with the motives which
-have determined me to remove Galib Pasha from the
-Ministry of Finance, whilst abstaining from any reflection
-whatever on his personal integrity, only emphasises the
-responsibility of Galib Pasha in the matter of finance.
-It is manifest that that faithful servant of the State, in
-conformity with the orders of our august Master, would
-not hesitate to admit his share of responsibility, and in
-order to put an end to a discussion which has no precedent,
-he should certainly claim an investigation, and submit to
-its consequences, whatever sacrifices it might entail; but
-since explanations are demanded of me, I hasten to give
-them as shortly as I can. In order to judge whether or
-not Galib Pasha is competent to administer the Finances
-of the State, it seems to me sufficient to refer to the fall
-in the value of paper money.</p>
-
-<p>“The paper of the State, fifteen years ago, amounted
-to twenty millions (£T), and yet its depreciation never
-reached more than 50 to 60 per cent, compared to gold,
-although its circulation was then limited to the radius of
-the town of Constantinople, and it was not received in
-payment of taxes. At the present time, although the
-amount issued does not amount to four millions, and
-there is no limit imposed to its circulation in the Empire,
-and it is accepted in payment of taxes, the depreciation
-amounts to 70 per cent. This state of things is the result
-of the carelessness and neglect on the part of the ministers
-of Finance. The depreciation, moreover, has given rise
-to venality and corruption on the part of functionaries
-in the Provinces, and to excitement and unrest, in consequence,
-in public opinion.</p>
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">140</a></span>
-<p>“We have no accusation to make against the probity
-and honesty of Galib Pasha, nor any complaint on the
-score of the obligation under which we lie, of issuing
-bonds to realise the sum necessary, in gold, for exportation
-to Europe for war purposes. But seeing that an
-issue of paper money, to an amount necessary for the
-realisation of £T100,000 only, is sufficient to cause a still
-further depreciation of the paper and rise in gold, the
-Minister of Finance is in duty bound to take such steps
-and employ such means as shall, as much as possible,
-prevent or mitigate this consequence. For instance, he
-should take a portion of the sum required from the
-receipts of the Treasury, in gold, and issue the remainder
-of the sum in paper, with such prudence and precaution
-as to avoid financial panic by all means in his power.
-But Galib Pasha seems incapable of appreciating such
-measures, and the finances of the State have suffered in
-consequence.</p>
-
-<p>“Such a state of things implies a grave responsibility,
-and as it is somebody’s duty to fix this responsibility, the
-functionary on whom devolves these particular duties
-would necessarily be the person to assume it. But it is
-also the duty of the person who happens to be Grand
-Vizier to superintend the general march of affairs, and to
-take steps to prevent all maladministration.</p>
-
-<p>“In the report made by Galib Pasha, which was read
-before the Council of Ministers, he declares himself
-incapable of finding a remedy for this state of things.
-And when an official makes such a declaration, it is impossible
-to keep him in the exercise of those functions
-without sharing the responsibility with him. It is on
-these grounds that we have based our opinion as to the
-necessity of replacing him.</p>
-
-<p>“The day after the issue of the Imperial Irade
-approving this decision, His Excellency Damad Mahmoud
-Djelaleddin Pasha advised us to recommend Galib Pasha
-for some other post; but it so happens that not only are
-the accounts in the treasury with reference to this paper
-money defective, but whereas we thought that only one
-million of paper money out of the proposed seven millions
-had actually been issued, we now find that two millions
-have in point of fact been issued.</p>
-
-<p>“I thought it therefore proper, as I informed you in
-my letter of the 14 Moharem, 1294, to keep Galib Pasha
-in the office of Finance until all his accounts were put
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">141</a></span>into proper order. In the discussion on these matters in
-the Council of Ministers, on the 6th day of Moharem,
-Galib Pasha informed us that he had made arrangements
-with some private bankers for the purchase of £T90,000
-in gold against £T210,000 paper. This enormous depreciation,
-which could be accepted only in the event of the
-extremest urgency, seemed to us beyond all limits of reason.</p>
-
-<p>“Whatever may be the personal honesty of an official,
-yet when such irregularities take place in his Office, it
-would seem more proper to request him first to put his
-accounts in order before appointing him off‐hand to another
-position of trust, such as the Senate.</p>
-
-<p>“On consideration of the whole matter, we are convinced
-that just as Galib Pasha’s incompetence involves
-no reflection on his honesty and probity, so the matter of
-the £T90,000 which I have just mentioned is far from
-revealing any desire on his part to conceal the real
-situation of affairs.</p>
-
-<p>“Hence the only reasons why we have requested a
-delay in the nomination of Galib Pasha to the Senate
-are founded on his own declarations last Wednesday before
-the Council of Ministers.</p>
-
-<p>“Although this little matter is scarcely worthy of so
-lengthy an explanation, I have made it simply on the
-demand addressed to me to furnish explanations on the
-subject, and in order to comply with the Imperial
-commands.</p>
-
-<p>“I will only, in conclusion, beg you very particularly
-to be good enough to bring these details to the notice of
-His Majesty, if he should express his desire to be made
-acquainted with them.<br />
-
-“Receive, Excellency, etc.,&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“9 <i>Moharem</i> 1293, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(25<i>th January</i> 1877.)</small></p></div>
-
-<p>The other question held in reserve was that of the
-mixed schools, a measure to which, as we have seen on
-several occasions, Midhat attached the greatest importance,
-as a means of welding together the different elements of
-the nation. He desired to make a beginning by applying
-it to the military academies of the Empire. The eve,
-possibly, of a great war, in which the nation might require<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">142</a></span>
-the service of all her sons, seemed to him the most
-opportune moment conceivable for the application of this
-most important reform. He accordingly pressed it on the
-Sultan. He was met by the ordinary Fabian tactics of
-the Palace&mdash;procrastination, promises, delay. The Sultan
-demurred, temporised, first gave and then withdrew his
-consent, and a long discussion ensued between them on
-the subject. The dispute culminated in the following
-Memorandum, addressed by Midhat in the name of the
-Ministry, to the Sultan, through the usual channel:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>To the First Secretary of His Majesty Saïd Pasha.</i><a name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor">18</a></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Excellency</span>,&mdash;All sincere friends of Turkey
-continue to urge us&mdash;as did Mr Thiers quite lately&mdash;in
-the actual condition of affairs, to give proofs to
-Europe of our sincerity and good intentions. This very
-day a despatch from Musurus Pasha informs us that Lord
-Derby congratulates the Imperial Government on the
-dissolution of the Conference, which he considers as a
-success for Turkey. At the same time Lord Derby
-urges us to conclude peace with Servia as soon as
-possible, and to make a beginning in carrying out those
-articles of the Constitution, and those propositions of
-the Conference, that are susceptible of immediate application.
-And whilst we, taking these friendly counsels
-into very serious consideration, are working with a view
-of putting into operation without delay the Firmans
-concerning reforms, an Imperial Irade, promulgated
-yesterday, prohibits the admission of Christians into
-the military schools, which a preceding Irade had
-authorised. Now, such a prohibition is calculated
-seriously to compromise, from the very beginning,
-an important reform that the whole world expects
-from the Constitution, and it is natural that obstacles
-of this kind should discourage and paralyse the efforts
-that we are constantly making to serve our country with
-devotion. We therefore regret sincerely that of all the
-questions which are now placed on the order of the day
-to be studied by the Council, this important one alone
-remains in suspense, and we regret it all the more in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">143</a></span>asmuch
-as the explanations that we addressed to His
-Majesty on the subject yesterday morning have remained
-unanswered. I therefore appeal to the Imperial goodwill,
-and beseech His Majesty to bring to bear on this question
-all the forethought and attention that it deserves.</p>
-
-<p class="right">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-<br />
-<p><small>“8 <i>Moharem</i> 1294, <i>Hegira</i>.”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(24<i>th January</i> 1877).</small></p></div>
-
-<p>Worn out by these tactics, Midhat determined to bring
-the matter to an issue, and make it what would be called
-a Cabinet question, and addressed to the Sultan the
-following letter:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Sire</span>,&mdash;The object of promulgating the Constitution
-was to abolish Absolutism, to indicate Your Majesty’s
-rights and duties, to define and establish those of
-Ministers; in a word, to secure to the nation complete and
-entire liberty, and thus by a common effort to raise the
-condition and position of the country.</p>
-
-<p>“Contrary to what had occurred in the case of former
-<em>Hatti Humayuns</em> promulgated thirty years back, the new
-charter was to subsist and receive its full application after
-the present political crisis should be at an end; for our object
-in promulgating that Constitution was certainly not merely
-to find a solution of the so‐called Eastern Question, nor
-to seek thereby to make a demonstration that should
-conciliate the sympathies of Europe which had been
-estranged from us.</p>
-
-<p>“Allow me, Sire, to offer a few observations on this
-subject. In the first place, Your Majesty, who is responsible
-before the nation for your acts, is bound to be
-acquainted with your duties as well as with your rights and
-prerogatives. It is, moreover, indispensable that Ministers
-should have the certain conviction of being able to
-accomplish their tasks, and that we should be able to
-free ourselves from that habit of servile flattery which has
-debased our people and ruined the country during the last
-four centuries.</p>
-
-<p>“I am animated by a profound respect for the person of
-Your Majesty. But basing my conduct on the ordinances
-of the Cheri (sacred law), I am bound to withhold obedience
-to the commands of Your Majesty whenever they
-are not in conformity with the interests of the nation;
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">144</a></span>otherwise the weight of my responsibility would be too
-heavy for me to bear. The dictates of my conscience that
-command me to conform my acts to the salvation and
-prosperity of my country impose an imperative obligation
-on me; and the judgment of my country, which is what I
-respect and cherish most, forbids me to act otherwise.</p>
-
-<p>“I desire earnestly that no shadow of a suspicion should
-cross the mind of Your Majesty, and I dread, as I have
-already said, to find later on that I have sinned against
-my own conscience and deserved the malediction of my
-countrymen. It is this very apprehension that forces me
-to submit those considerations to Your Majesty. It is
-indispensable, Sire, that the Ottoman nation should have
-the power to reform and administer their country, according
-to the law. It is unnecessary for me to point out or
-explain to Your Majesty all that is contained in this
-phrase. I humbly pray and beseech Your Majesty to
-have confidence in me and my colleagues in the accomplishment
-of our difficult task, in which patriotism and
-love of our country are our only motives and inspiration.</p>
-
-<p>“I trust that I have not as yet committed any act
-compromising the responsibility that I feel, and I desire
-that the nation should be imbued with the sense of our
-responsibility towards it, otherwise no satisfactory result
-can ever be attained.</p>
-
-<p>“It is now nine days, Sire, since you have abstained
-from giving a favourable answer to my petition. You
-thereby refuse to sanction laws indispensable to the
-welfare of the country, and without which our whole
-previous work will be rendered futile. Whilst Your
-Majesty’s Ministers are engaged in endeavouring to
-restore the governmental edifice which has with so
-much difficulty escaped total ruin, surely Your Majesty
-would not willingly add to the work of destruction.</p>
-
-<p>“If Your Majesty should in consequence of the above
-named opinions consider it your duty to relieve me of my
-functions as Grand Vizier, I would pray Your Majesty to
-confide them into such strong hands as shall be able to
-reconcile the principles and ideas of Your Majesty with
-the necessities of the country and the gravity of the situation
-in which the Empire finds itself placed to‐day.&mdash;I am,
-Sire, Your Majesty’s humble servant,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“18<i>th January</i> 1293, <i>O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(30<i>th January</i> 1877.)</small></p></div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">145</a></span></p>
-
-<p>For three days he abstained from going to the Palace.</p>
-
-<p>The Sultan, who was now prepared for extremities, sent
-Safvet Pasha to him to inform him that all he demanded
-would be granted and to request him to come to the Palace.
-Safvet Pasha, Minister for Foreign Affairs, and one of the
-Turkish delegates at the Conference, was not what would
-be called a strong Minister. He was prone to conciliation
-and compromise rather than energetic measures and resolutions;
-but he was essentially an honest man: duplicity
-and treachery were absolutely foreign to his nature. If on
-this occasion he was intended as an instrument of duplicity,
-it was practised at his own expense, and he was merely
-an unconscious tool. Midhat, however, demurred to
-the invitation, and required the necessary Irades to be
-issued on the matters pending with the Palace, before
-he resumed his functions as Grand Vizier. Thereupon
-the Sultan sent his first aide‐de‐camp, Saïd (Ingless)
-Pasha, to him, to assure him that the Irades were ready, if he
-would, on the Sultan’s order, accompany him to the Palace.
-Midhat went. He perceived on his way an unwonted
-display of troops in the district of Tavshan Tashi,
-where his Konak was situated, but he was not aware
-then, on the night of the 4th‐5th February, that the
-Imperial Yacht <em>Izzeddine</em> was moored close to the
-marble steps leading up to the terrace of the Palace of
-Dolma‐Bagtche. If he had perceived it and guessed its
-purpose, it was too late to retreat, or to escape the snare
-laid for him. On his arrival at the Palace he was shown
-into a small ante‐chamber and told to await the Sultan’s
-orders.</p>
-
-<p>The first aide‐de‐camp soon returned with the Sultan’s
-order to deliver up his seal of office, and to accompany
-him.</p>
-
-<p>He then conducted him on board the <em>Izzeddine</em>,
-which, with steam already up, immediately weighed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">146</a></span>
-anchor and steamed off in the direction of the Sea of
-Marmora with Midhat on board. The Captain of the
-<em>Izzeddine</em> had sealed orders, which he was only to open in
-the Sea of Marmora. These orders were, that he should
-wait for twenty‐four hours in the Bay of Tchekmedje, and if
-he received no telegram within that space of time, he was to
-conduct Midhat to any European port on the Mediterranean
-that the ex‐Grand Vizier might select. No despatch
-arriving, he proceeded on his course to Brindisi, where he
-landed Midhat.</p>
-
-<p>That the forcible banishment of the Grand Vizier was
-a violation of the letter as well as the spirit of the
-Constitution promulgated and sworn to by the Sultan, has
-never been seriously denied. The “reason of State” urged
-would obviously cover any act of arbitrary power whatever.
-It was for the express purpose of putting an end to such
-an arbitrary <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">régime</i> that the Constitution was framed and
-insisted on. The flimsy pretext put forward, that it was in
-accordance with the 113th Article of the Constitution, will
-not bear the most superficial examination. The power
-therein conceded to the Sultan was in a rider to a clause
-declaring a state of siege when the safety of the State
-required it, and the purport and limits of the clause must
-necessarily govern the subsidiary provisions of the clause
-itself. Not only could a rider of this description not bear
-the interpretation sought to be placed upon it, but other
-substantial clauses of the Constitution directly forbade the
-exercise of any such arbitrary power, and provided for the
-elementary right that no man should be punished except
-after due trial. But further: clauses 31, 32, and 34 contained
-special and minute provisions for the arrest and
-trial of Ministers guilty of treason or malversation, so
-that both positively and negatively, in its substantial provisions
-and in its omissions, the banishment of Midhat, with
-its attendant circumstances, was as clear a violation of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">147</a></span>
-Constitution as the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">coup d’état</i> of the 2nd December 1852
-in France.</p>
-
-<p>But political morality and good faith and patriotism
-apart, it must be allowed that the tactics pursued by
-the Palace were, <em>qua</em> tactics, very cleverly devised. If
-the Sultan had struck at the Constitution as well as the
-champion of it; at reform at the same time as the reformer,
-he would undoubtedly have raised a storm in the country
-which would have immediately endangered his throne;
-but by striking down the father and pillar of the
-Reformers he practically killed reform, and put the
-Constitution at his mercy as certainly as if he had
-suppressed it then and there; and whilst pretending
-himself to champion both reform and the Constitution,
-he managed to play the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">rôle</i> of Wat Tyler successfully,
-and to take the sting out of the blow, and conceal
-the full meaning of the act that he had just committed.
-There was a party in Constantinople, to which personal
-ambition was not a stranger, who imagined that Midhat
-was not essential to the cause of the Constitution, and
-that Abdul Hamid II. was sincere in his protestations of
-reforming ardour. Some were of good faith, and some were
-simply moved by ambition. Both very soon discovered
-their mistake, and in various distant provinces found leisure
-to reflect and repent of their confiding innocence.</p>
-
-<p>The Palace, although they had hazarded this great
-<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">coup</i>, did not feel at all secure as to the effect it might
-produce on the population of Constantinople, in spite
-of all the measures of precaution that had been taken;
-and the order given to the captain of the <em>Izzeddine</em>
-to remain twenty‐four hours at anchor in the bay of
-Tchekmedje, was with a view, in case of a serious
-rising in the capital, of recalling Midhat and persuading
-him to resume his functions&mdash;until a more convenient
-opportunity arose. The Palace was playing for safety.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">148</a></span></p>
-
-<p>Stunned by the suddenness of the blow, entirely unprepared
-for any concerted action, and distracted by reports
-industriously spread, the people did not rise, and the Palace
-breathed freely. It had gained a complete victory.</p>
-
-<p><span class="gesperrt">* * * * *</span></p>
-
-<p>Between the breaking up of the Conference and the
-breaking out of the war, the sequence of diplomatic action
-can be very briefly narrated. On the 19th January 1877
-Prince Gortchakoff issued a Circular to the Powers, which
-can be summed up in the question, “What are you going
-to do about it?” One particular phrase, however, in this
-document must be noted. He says that the agreement
-in the Berlin Memorandum not being unanimous, and
-the crisis being aggravated, among other causes, by the
-revolution in Constantinople, the Cabinets recommenced
-negotiations, and, on the initiative of England, agreed upon
-a basis and guarantees to be discussed at a Conference
-at Constantinople. There is very little doubt that this
-revolution in Constantinople&mdash;which had the avowed
-object of checking absolutism and giving the Turkish
-people guarantees for good government&mdash;was in the eyes
-of Russia an aggravation of the crisis, and justified, and
-even necessitated, in her opinion, hostile action against
-Turkey. That Russia, who had undertaken the championship
-of liberty and progress among the inhabitants of
-a neighbouring empire, should be confronted by the
-establishment of institutions far more liberal and advanced
-than anything her own people were allowed to dream of;
-and that there should be sitting at Constantinople a
-Parliament, the very name of which was a terror and
-nightmare at St Petersburg, was without question an
-intolerable grievance.</p>
-
-<p><i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">À propos</i> of this, the famous despatch of Count Pozzo
-di Borgo, of November 1828, to M. de Nesselrode, may
-be read with profit:</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">149</a></span></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“When the Imperial Cabinet examines the question
-as to whether the moment had arrived to take up arms
-against the Porte, some doubts as to the urgency of
-this measure might exist in the minds of those who had
-not sufficiently meditated on the effects of the sanguinary
-reforms that the Ottoman Chief had just executed with
-terrible energy. But now the experience that we have
-just had ought to unite everybody in favour of the line
-then adopted. The Emperor has put the Turkish system
-to the proof, and His Majesty has found in it a commencement
-of material and moral organisation which hitherto
-it has never possessed. If the Sultan has been enabled to
-oppose to us a more lively and sustained resistance whilst
-he had scarcely collected the elements of his new plans
-of reform and improvement, how much more formidable
-should we have found him if he had had time to give them
-more consistency and solidity?...”</p></div>
-
-<p>The whole policy of Russia towards Turkey is contained
-in the above despatch. The Cabinets of the Powers
-did not immediately answer Prince Gortchakoff’s Circular
-of the 19th January. General Ignatieff took a circular
-journey round Europe and felt the pulses of its Governments.
-On the 13th March, Count Schouvaloff handed
-to Lord Derby the draft Protocol which it was proposed
-to submit to the signature of the Great Powers, so as
-“to terminate the incident.” In this interview, the Russian
-Ambassador urged in favour of this course the unfortunate
-result that would ensue if shades of difference of opinion
-were to manifest themselves in the replies of the various
-Cabinets to the Russian Circular, which might be a
-determining cause to induce Russia to seek for a solution
-<em>either by means of a direct understanding with the Porte</em>,
-or by force of arms.</p>
-
-<p>Lord Derby does not seem to have requested the Russian
-Ambassador to explain the above oracular utterance.
-There was more in it than he perhaps imagined. Another
-remarkable expression fell from Count Schouvaloff at this
-interview, and one which shows that he did not give<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">150</a></span>
-himself the trouble, in his interview with the English
-Minister, to maintain even the appearance of consistency.
-“<cite>As a period of some months would not be sufficient to
-accomplish these reforms</cite>, it would be preferable,” etc. But
-this was Mr Disraeli’s and Lord Derby’s contention, though
-not sustained, for postponing diplomatic action, and the
-Turkish Ministers were never tired of urging it as a good
-and valid reason for deferring the Conference altogether.</p>
-
-<p class="tb">The Protocol that was signed at London on the 31st
-March 1877 was certainly, as compared with the Protocol
-of the Conference, a very colourless document. After recapitulating
-certain recent diplomatic acts and taking
-cognisance of certain others, in view of certain indications,
-“the Powers propose <em>to watch carefully</em> by means of their
-Representatives at Constantinople, and their local agents,
-the manner in which the promises of the Ottoman Government
-are carried into effect.” It concluded by saying: “If
-their hopes should once more be disappointed, and if the
-conditions of the Christian subjects of the Sultan should
-not be improved in a manner to prevent the return of
-the complications which periodically disturb the peace of
-the East, they think it right to declare that such a state
-of things would be incompatible with their interests and
-those of Europe in general. In such case, they reserve
-to themselves the right to consider, in common, the means
-which they may deem best fitted to secure the well‐being
-of the Christian population and the interests of the general
-peace.”</p>
-
-<p>This Protocol was accompanied by two remarkable
-declarations, annexed to the Minutes of the Meeting at
-the Foreign Office at which the Protocol was signed&mdash;the
-one on the part of the Russian Ambassador, the other
-on that of the English Minister.</p>
-
-<p>The latter was to the effect that, in the event of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">151</a></span>
-the object for which the Protocol had been signed, viz.,
-reciprocal disarmament and peace, not being attained, the
-Protocol in question should be regarded as null and void.</p>
-
-<p>The declaration by the Russian Ambassador was in
-the following terms:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“If peace with Montenegro is concluded, and the Porte
-accepts the advice of Europe and shows itself ready to
-replace its forces on a peace footing, and seriously to
-undertake the reforms mentioned in the Protocol, let it
-send to St Petersburg a special envoy to treat of disarmament,
-to which his Majesty the Emperor would also,
-on his part, consent. If massacres similar to those which
-have occurred in Bulgaria take place, this would necessarily
-put a stop to the measures of demobilization.”</p></div>
-
-<p>The Porte thought fit, perhaps unnecessarily, inasmuch
-as its adhesion to the Protocol was not required,
-to make on the 9th April 1877 a most elaborate and
-spirited answer to the position taken up by the signatories
-of that document.</p>
-
-<p>It pointed out that the efforts of the Powers were
-exclusively directed to what they considered the well‐being
-of one portion only of the Sultan’s subjects, whereas
-the reforms which the new Constitution aimed at introducing
-did not bear a special or exclusive character in
-regard to province, race, creed or language. That the
-small account which the Powers seemed to have taken
-both of the great principles of equality and justice which
-the Turkish Government sought to introduce into the
-internal administration, and of its rights of independence
-and sovereignty, was deeply to be regretted. That Turkey
-as an independent State could not submit “to be placed
-under any surveillance, whether collective or not.” That
-the Treaty of Paris explicitly declared the principle of
-non‐intervention. That Treaty which binds the other high
-contracting parties as well as Turkey, cannot be abolished<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">152</a></span>
-by a Protocol in which Turkey has taken no part. And
-as for the last clause, the Government of the Sultan saw
-in it “a proceeding of intimidation calculated to deprive
-their action of all merit of spontaneity, and a source of
-grave complication for the present as well as for the
-future.”</p>
-
-<p>With reference to the declaration of the Russian Ambassador
-annexed to the Protocol, the Porte very pointedly
-remarked that “as regards the disorders which might break
-out in Turkey and arrest the demobilization of the Russian
-army, the Sultan’s Government, while resenting the offensive
-terms in which this idea has been expressed, believes that
-Europe is convinced that the disorders which have disturbed
-the tranquillity of the provinces were due to external
-agitation; that the Imperial Government cannot be held
-responsible for them, and that consequently the Russian
-Government will not be justified <em>in making the demobilization
-of its armies depend on such contingencies</em>.”</p>
-
-<p>This last paragraph pointed out a serious practical
-difficulty that confronted the Ottoman Government with
-reference to the proposal for demobilization. Russia was
-supposed to be able to mobilise her armies in eight days:
-at any rate, it was a question of days with her. Turkey,
-on account of her geographical position, and the nature of
-her organisation, required several months to effect this
-object. If, therefore, after making the greatest sacrifices in
-order to collect her forces, she were now to dismiss them to
-their distant homes, and Russia were allowed, on a pretext
-indicated by herself, to remobilise her own army, Turkey
-would be caught at the greatest possible disadvantage, and
-would then be completely at the mercy of her unscrupulous
-opponent. And nothing would be easier than for Russia,
-employing the means at which she had shown herself an
-adept, to excite troubles which would give her the very
-justification which she sought for a systematic attack on<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">153</a></span>
-the now defenceless Ottoman Empire. The Porte had had
-experience of this very same line of action and of argument
-in respect to Servia. On the 2nd November 1876, Sir
-H. Elliot writes to Lord Derby that “General Ignatieff
-told me this morning that he has been directed by his
-Government to inform the Porte that they would consider
-any excesses committed by the Turkish troops as a
-violation of the armistice; and one of the secretaries of the
-Russian Embassy was desired this afternoon to tell me,
-further, that the General had orders at once to leave
-Constantinople upon any violation of it occurring,” and
-he adds, “a ready pretext for a rupture appears thus to
-be prepared.”<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor">19</a></p>
-
-<p>On the 19th April 1877, Prince Gortchakoff issued
-another Circular announcing a declaration of war against
-the Ottoman Empire, and concluding with the following
-most remarkable sentence: “In assuming this task,
-our august Master fulfils a duty imposed upon him by
-the interests of Russia, whose <em>peaceful development is
-hindered by the permanent disturbances of the East</em>.”</p>
-
-<p>Commentary would spoil this choice bit. The lamb
-was troubling the stream.</p>
-
-<p>On the 1st May, Lord Derby made a most caustic
-and merciless reply to the Russian Circular.</p>
-
-<p>After pointing out that the Porte had never wavered
-“in affirming its intention of carrying out the reforms
-already promised,” which was the avowed object of the
-Powers, and that by patience and moderation on both
-sides these objects might still have been attained, and
-that it was the presence of large Russian forces on the
-frontiers of Turkey, “menacing its safety, rendering disarmament
-impossible, and exciting a feeling of apprehension
-and fanaticism among the Mussulman population,” that
-constituted a material obstacle to internal pacification and
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">154</a></span>reform. It went on to say, that the course on which the
-Russian Government had entered involved graver and
-more serious considerations. It was in contravention of
-the stipulation of the Treaty of Paris of 30th March, 1856,
-by which Russia and the other signatory Powers engaged,
-each on its own part, to respect the independence and
-the territorial integrity of the Ottoman Empire, and
-further, that they had, as late as 1871, signed a declaration
-at the Conference of London, affirming it to be “an
-essential principle of the law of nations that no Power
-can liberate itself from the engagements of a Treaty, nor
-modify the stipulations thereof, unless with the consent of
-the Contracting Parties by means of an amicable arrangement.”
-It concluded by saying, in reference to the pretension
-that Russia was acting in the interest of Great Britain
-and of the other Powers, that it felt bound to state in a
-manner equally formal and public that the decision of the
-Russian Government was not one that could have their concurrence
-or approval.</p>
-
-<p>Nothing could be more logical or reasonable, but it
-was not logic or reason that could keep the Russian
-armies on their side of the Pruth.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">155</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER VII<br /><br />
-
-<small>MIDHAT PASHA IN EUROPE</small></h2>
-
-<p><span class="smcap">The</span> exile of Midhat Pasha to Europe, after his sensational
-downfall from power on 5th February 1877, caused
-very much excitement in Europe. The Emperor of
-Austria is reported to have exclaimed, “Good Heavens!
-these Turks are incorrigible!”; while M. Thiers said,
-“Turkey’s most inveterate enemy could hardly have
-devised such a diabolical piece of advice to give to the
-Sultan.” The Cabinets lost all hope of seeing reforms
-introduced into Turkey. The English, as well as the
-greater part of the European Press, showed their sympathy
-towards the ex‐Grand Vizier and their discontent with
-the Sultan. Amongst the Russian newspapers the <em>Golos</em>
-of St Petersburg, 9th February 1877, whilst clearly
-showing the interest that Russia had in the disgrace of
-Midhat Pasha, yet expressed its opinions in the following
-manner:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“The end of the Turkish Empire in Europe has come.
-All that is now wanted is patience, and waiting is not
-difficult, since war is impossible with a State which will
-perish more quickly by the effect of its internal crisis than
-through a foreign army. Russia will have time enough to
-save the Christians from the misfortune that might befall
-them through the fall of Turkey. It is now more to the
-advantage of Russia, as well as of the Christians, to wait
-and see how the course of Turkish decay will shape
-itself than to prolong the process of dissolution by interference.”<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id="FNanchor_20_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_20" class="fnanchor">20</a></p></div>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">156</a></span></p>
-<p>The exile of Midhat, and the consequent change in the
-Ministry, also caused the very greatest commotion throughout
-the greater part of the Turkish population.<a name="FNanchor_21_21" id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class="fnanchor">21</a> But the
-Sultan had taken every precaution against the possibility
-of any insurrection on the part of the people in favour of
-the exiled Grand Vizier, and he hastened to assemble
-Parliament, in order that he might gain the credit of being
-considered even more liberal than his Grand Vizier; and
-to show that the downfall of Midhat by no means involved
-the abolition of the recently promulgated Constitution, he
-opened Parliament.</p>
-
-<p>The opening of the new Parliament had been fixed
-for the 1st March, but owing to the fact that many of
-the deputies from the more distant provinces had not
-arrived in the capital, the ceremony was adjourned till the
-4th March. On that day Parliament was opened with
-great ceremony by the Sultan in the Palace of Dolma‐Bagtche.</p>
-
-<p>On the right of the throne stood the Ministers and high
-functionaries, the Chiefs of the Christian communities, and
-members of the Council of State; on the left, the Ulema,
-and Cadi, and Heads of the High Courts of Justice, with
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">157</a></span>the Generals of Division; behind these the pages of the
-Court. Behind the throne were the Foreign Representatives,
-and interspersed between the groups on the
-right and left of the throne were the Senators and Representatives
-in the Parliament. The Sultan entered, dressed
-in black, and stood by the throne with his hand on his
-sword, whilst his First Secretary read the following Opening
-Speech:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>The Sultan’s Speech.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Senators and Deputies,&mdash;Gentlemen</span>,&mdash;The
-difficulties and dangers which our general situation presents
-cannot be compared to any of the crises through which
-the Empire has hitherto passed. I was obliged, first of
-all, in order to guard the rights of the Empire, to augment
-the effective force of our armies at various points, and to
-call under arms 700,000 combatants. Next I considered
-it a duty to try, by means of essential reforms, to put an
-end, with God’s help, to the disorder of the situation, and
-thus to insure our future in a permanent fashion. It is
-evident that, thanks to the resources with which Providence
-has endowed our country, and the aptitudes of our subjects,
-a good administration would enable us in a short time to
-make considerable progress. If we have not reached the
-level of progress of other parts of the civilised world, the
-cause of this must be traced to the instability of the institutions
-necessary to the State, and of the laws and regulations
-issuing therefrom. This instability proceeded from everything,
-being in the hands of an absolute Government, which
-disregarded the salutary principle of common deliberation.
-The progress effected by civilised States, the security and
-wealth they enjoy, are the fruit of the participation of all in
-the enactment of laws and in the administration of public
-affairs. This is why we thought it necessary to seek in
-that course the means of arriving at progress, and of enacting
-and enforcing laws adopted by the common consent of
-the population. For this purpose I have granted and
-promulgated the Constitution. By the promulgation of
-the Constitution, I have not simply designed to invite the
-population to share in the direction of public affairs; I
-have had the firm resolution of employing the deliberative
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">158</a></span>system as an effective means for the amelioration of the
-administrative system of the country, to preserve it from
-maladministration and absolutism. Irrespective of these
-fundamental advantages, the Constitution guarantees the
-unity of the governed, and confirms the principle of the
-welfare and fraternal solidarity of the population; for our
-illustrious ancestors, having, by God’s grace, extended their
-possessions and aggrandised the Empire, have combined
-under their rule a large number of peoples. These peoples
-being of various nationalities and religions, it was desirable
-that a uniform law should unite and protect them all. I
-give thanks to Divine Providence for this legitimate aspiration
-being at length realised. Henceforth all my subjects
-will be considered children of the same country, and will
-be placed under the protection of one law. They will be
-designated by the name borne by the illustrious race of the
-Founders of the Empire&mdash;a name associated with the
-glorious annals of a history of 600 years. I have a firm
-conviction that from this moment all my subjects will unite
-their efforts to make the name Osmanli retain the force
-and power hitherto surrounding it. I am therefore resolved,
-in view of this ideal and these reasons, not to deviate from
-the course which I have just adopted, and ever to adhere
-closely to it. I expect from you a real and intelligent co‐operation,
-in order to derive legitimate benefit from the
-Constitution, which is based on justice and the public
-security. I have deemed it necessary to insure to all the
-advantages of liberty and equality, to abolish the system of
-arbitrariness, to enact and execute laws adopted in common
-accord with the population, and, lastly, to found our administrative
-system on constitutional and liberal principles.
-It is in order to realise this sincere desire that I have
-created and convoked your body, composed of the Senate
-and Chamber of Deputies. It now devolves on you
-faithfully and honestly to fulfil the legislative duties
-intrusted to your patriotism. In this task you should not
-be influenced by any personal considerations, but have in
-view only the faithful maintenance of the safety and welfare
-of the State and country. The improvements which we
-now need, and the reforms in all the public services, are
-of the highest importance. The gradual application of
-these measures depends on the accord which shall prevail
-among you. The Council of State is engaged in framing
-Bills which will be submitted to you. In the present
-Session you will have before you Bills on the Standing
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">159</a></span>Orders of the Chamber, the Electoral Law, the General
-Law respecting the Vilayets and the Government of the
-Communes, the Municipal Law, the Civil Code of Procedure;
-the laws relative to the re‐organisation of the
-Tribunal and the mode of promoting and superannuating
-Judges, the Law concerning the functions and retiring
-pensions of all public functionaries in general, the Law of
-the Press, that respecting the Court of Accounts, and,
-lastly, the Budget Law. I desire that these different Bills
-be successively studied and discussed. You will have
-especially to occupy yourselves with the re‐organisation of
-the Tribunals, the only safeguard for the rights of everyone,
-and with the formation of the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">gendarmerie</i>. In order to
-attain this end, it will be necessary to augment the amount
-of special grants for these two branches of the Service.
-As you will see from the Budget which will be submitted
-to the Chamber, our finances are in an extremely difficult
-situation. I recommend you, above all, to adopt common
-measures adapted to meet the difficulties of the situation
-and to restore our credit. You will have moreover, to take
-measures to insure the supply of funds required for urgent
-reforms. One of the greatest wants of our Empire and of
-our subjects is the development of agriculture and industry,
-and the progress of civilisation and of public wealth. This
-result can only be obtained by means of the development
-of public instruction. Measures with the object of
-improving educational establishments, and of fixing the
-programme of studies, will be submitted to the Chambers
-in the Session of next year. The Imperial Government
-attaches the greatest importance to the choice and appointment
-of the functionaries who will be called upon to apply
-and execute the above‐mentioned laws and those which
-will be ultimately promulgated for the working of the
-Constitution. Since my accession to the Throne I have
-given particular attention to this question. It is for this
-reason that I have decided on instituting, at my own
-expense, a special school for the education of administrative
-officials. As stated by the published organic regulations
-of that school, they will be admitted to the highest
-administrative and political posts. The pupils will be
-selected without distinction of religion, from all classes of
-my subjects. Their promotion will be according to the
-degree of their capacity. For nearly two years we have had
-to face internal complications. During this period, especially
-during the hostilities with Servia and Montenegro,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">160</a></span>our faithful subjects have given proofs of patriotism, and
-our troops have done, at the price of great suffering, acts of
-courage and bravery which I profoundly appreciate. In
-all questions we have only had the defence of our rights
-in view. The efforts we have made for this purpose have
-had the result of restoring peace with Servia. As to the
-decision we shall take in the negotiations with Montenegro,
-it will be referred to your deliberations at their first sitting.
-I advise you to be prompt in deciding. Our relations
-with friendly Powers are still marked by that courtesy
-and deference which are among the most precious rules
-for our State. Several months ago the Government of
-England proposed the meeting of a Conference in our
-capital for the consideration of the present questions.
-The bases proposed being also supported by the other
-Great Powers, our Sublime Porte consented to the meeting
-of the Conference. Though a definite understanding was
-not obtained in that Conference, we have given proofs of
-our sincere desire to defer to the wishes and counsels of
-friendly Powers. As to the causes of the non‐agreement
-of the Conference, these lay rather in the form and the
-mode of execution than in the substance. I thoroughly
-appreciate the imperative necessity of continuing the efforts
-for progress, by which so much has already been achieved,
-from the origin of the <em>Tanzimat</em> till this time, in all
-branches of the administration, and in the general
-condition of my Empire. All our efforts still tend towards
-that object. But on this occasion I considered it my
-duty to preserve the country from all attacks on its
-honour and independence. Time will prove the sincerity
-of our intentions. Our desire being in all cases to maintain
-our rights and independence, we adopt also for the
-future the same line of conduct. I rejoice to think that
-the proofs of moderation and sincerity furnished by our
-State, before and after the Conference, will have served to
-strengthen the bonds of friendship and sympathy which
-unite my Empire to the Concert of European Powers.
-May the Almighty deign to grant success to our common
-efforts!”</p></div>
-
-<p>Thus, against his will, the Sultan had been obliged to
-keep his word and to open the Chamber of Deputies, but
-he now left no means untried in order to deprive the
-people of the privilege which he had just granted them.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">161</a></span>
-It so happened that events occurred which furnished him
-with certain opportunities, of which he took advantage with
-the greatest astuteness, and which were very much to
-the detriment of the nation.</p>
-
-<p>The refusal of the Porte and of the Grand Council to
-accept the propositions formulated at the Conference
-had placed Turkey in an exceedingly critical position,
-although the whole civilised world, with the exception of
-Russia and the Sultan Abdul Hamid, were convinced
-that this refusal was of no great importance, since
-the solemnly proclaimed Constitution had assured the
-Empire that the necessary reforms should be made, and
-that the maladministration should be brought to an
-end. Nevertheless, the fall of Midhat, of the very man to
-whom the empire owed this Constitution, gave rise to
-doubt as to the execution of the promised reforms. On
-19th April, Prince Gortchakoff sent out his Circular to
-the Powers, and on the 24th of April hostilities were
-begun by Russia.</p>
-
-<p>Public opinion in Turkey was thus entirely engrossed
-by the danger with which the empire was threatened
-from outside, and was no longer able to concentrate
-itself on the changes that were taking place in the
-internal government. All minds were excited at the
-near approach of Russia, and were unable to occupy
-themselves in the maintenance of those rights which
-had been conferred by the new charter. The Sultan
-was thus able to attain his object, and finding no
-longer any obstacle to his will, he closed the Parliament
-and exiled the few deputies who dared to raise their
-voice in protest.</p>
-
-<p>The war declared by Russia was the necessary result
-of the policy which Abdul Hamid had proposed to follow.
-Having exiled Midhat Pasha, and closed Parliament
-without having executed a single reform, he was equally<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">162</a></span>
-obliged to crush every liberal tendency in order that he
-might monopolise the supreme power, and spared no
-effort to rid himself of every force that was capable of
-thwarting his designs. He now began to get secret
-information as to the opinions of all the principal Ministers
-and Generals, and took care at once to deprive of all
-power those whom he feared might be dangerous to
-him. The contradictory instructions that he gave to the
-Generals, the absurd military orders that he issued from
-his Palace of Yildiz, were transmitted after reports which
-attributed revolutionary designs to certain of his Generals&mdash;designs
-which they were far from cherishing&mdash;had
-reached him.</p>
-
-<p>It was in consequence of these suspicions on the part
-of the Sultan that the Commander‐in‐Chief Abdul Kerim
-and the Marshal Suleiman Pasha were brought before a
-Council of War and condemned, <em>not</em> on account of faults
-committed, but simply because one of these two chief
-officers had participated in the deposition of the Sultan
-Abdul Aziz, and the other was known to have liberal
-opinions.</p>
-
-<p>The Sultan’s efforts were crowned by the Treaty of
-San Stefano. The Circular of Prince Gortchakoff,
-which had appeared in the Official Journal of St
-Petersburg on the 9th April 1877, showed that what
-Russia had wished to obtain from Turkey by the
-Conference of Constantinople, differed but very little
-from the conditions which she imposed on the Porte in
-the Treaty of San Stefano, a fact to which Lord
-Salisbury rendered due justice in his despatch of 1st
-April.</p>
-
-<p>Although the Cabinet of Great Britain had firmly
-stated its intentions of not entering into the quarrel, the
-general interests of Europe and the special interests of
-England were so deeply involved in the dispute, that it<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_163" id="Page_163">163</a></span>
-was impossible for that Power not to be obliged sooner or
-later to take some share in the proceedings. The intervention
-of England, although unhappily it came rather
-late in the day, led to the Congress of Berlin, which
-blotted out the Treaty of San Stefano.</p>
-
-<p>As Midhat Pasha, however, played no part in the
-Russo‐Turkish War, nor in the events that followed, we
-will pass over them, and relate the vicissitudes of his
-journey in Europe, including the interviews which he had
-with the heads of States and celebrated politicians.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat arrived at Brindisi, 11th February, 1877, and
-after a few days’ rest left for Naples, where he had at
-first wished to live, withdrawn from the world and its
-capitals. The following statement, which we reprint from
-the <cite>Neue Freie Presse</cite> of Vienna, was made by him on
-the future of the Constitution:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“It is not despotism which, by my banishment, has
-reacted against the constitutional <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">régime</i>. That is not at
-all the case. Montesquieu has taught us that the creation
-of a constitution is very difficult and takes much time.
-A sovereign prince, accustomed to absolute power, can
-only be persuaded little by little to abandon his prerogatives,
-that being necessary to the constitutional <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">régime</i>.
-It is a difficult task, frequently interrupted by contrary
-currents, but for all that one need never despair of reaching
-the goal, for with time, patience and perseverance
-success is attainable. It is not in the person of the
-Sultan, nor yet through his present Ministers, that I see
-danger for the Constitution, but rather in the want of
-character and of courage so often to be found in those
-who are the Sovereign’s Councillors, and who, instead
-of acting according to their convictions, seek their own
-advantage in hiding the truth. I have never hesitated
-about giving my opinion to the Sultan, whoever he might
-be, whenever it happened to differ from his; I have always
-done so with the greatest respect, but also without the
-least reticence. Many a misfortune might have been
-avoided in this world of ours if there had not been a great
-lack of men, capable of placing the whole truth before
-their Sovereign.</p>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_164" id="Page_164">164</a></span></p>
-<p>“The danger to the Constitution lies, not in the lack
-of goodwill, but in the ignorance as to how to manage
-the mechanism. The Governmental form of despotism
-reminds me somewhat of a primitive mill, which may be
-turned by the force of water, or may equally be turned
-by its wheel. Constitutional Government also resembles
-a mill&mdash;but one that is put in movement by a complicated
-and artistically constructed mechanism. A knowledge as
-to how to work this machine and to keep it in movement
-is absolutely necessary. Thus, we must hope that the
-men of experience who find themselves at the head of
-affairs at Constantinople will not put the machinery of
-the new mill in motion, in accordance with the ideas
-and routine of the primitive mill. Constitutional Government
-cannot have the customs and the men of the
-Despotic system as its motive power. Reshid Pasha,
-our great reformer, was one day reproached for employing
-young men who had only just left college; he replied
-that it was right that it should be so, as neither one man
-alone, nor yet ten, could possibly do everything, and that
-it was therefore necessary to prepare a fresh staff of
-administrators. This has always been my idea, and
-whenever I have seen many rivals around me, I have
-delighted in the thought that it was to the profit of my
-country.</p>
-
-<p>“If a man would render real and genuine services to
-his Sovereign and his Nation, he must be <em>patriotic</em>, and
-very much depends upon the way in which each person
-interprets this word. As for me, I consider that man to
-be a true patriot who, renouncing his own private interests,
-devotes himself morally and physically to one supreme
-aim&mdash;the welfare of his country. One must be willing to
-renounce everything&mdash;to be ready at a moment’s notice to
-sacrifice happiness, family, and life itself for what one
-realises to be the good of the Fatherland.</p>
-
-<p>“I have frequently been in a position in which I might
-have remained Minister, or have acquired vast wealth, and
-so have been able to end my days in the midst of luxury
-and covered with honours. But such is not my idea of
-patriotism.</p>
-
-<p>“The esteem, love and sympathy of my nation have
-been always valued by me far above all other favours
-and all the splendours of this world. I could not remain
-a Minister when my Sovereign refused to allow me to
-act as I thought necessary for the honour and welfare
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">165</a></span>of my country, and I prefer poverty and exile to the
-swords of honour, the diamonds and highest favours;
-and to be held in esteem by my compatriots is to me
-the proudest and keenest satisfaction.”</p></div>
-
-<p>Events in the East having now begun to assume a
-more and more threatening aspect, Midhat felt he could
-not possibly remain in inactivity at Naples, in the face
-of all the troubles that assailed his country. He went
-to Paris, and thence he crossed to London. He was
-the subject of the warmest welcome in each of the two
-capitals. Although an exile, he worked his hardest to
-find some favourable issue, and to deliver his country
-from the risk she ran in the Russian War. His friendly
-relations with Lord Beaconsfield and with the other
-English statesmen did not fail to produce some good
-effects in helping to save his country from an unjust
-war. When he had seen that the English Government
-were disposed to offer their good office for the promotion
-of an honourable peace, he left London for Vienna, where
-he was granted an audience by the Emperor Francis
-Joseph. On receiving news of the resistance offered by
-the Turkish army to the Russians, he addressed the
-following telegram to the Sultan Abdul Hamid:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>To H.M. First Secretary, Saïd Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“During my stay in London, I have tried to employ
-all my feeble efforts in favour of the Empire’s cause,
-and to obtain an honourable peace. I flatter myself that
-I have achieved some results. Now that I am at Vienna
-I am desirous of acting in the same way, subject of
-course to the approval of His Imperial Majesty, but
-it naturally goes without saying that in order that my
-efforts may be crowned with any measure of success,
-I must be to some extent acquainted with His Majesty’s
-plans, so that guided by the intentions of the Government,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">166</a></span>I may, to the best of my ability, render those services
-which are necessary in the crisis through which we are
-passing.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2"><span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.”</p>
-
-<p><small>(1877.)</small></p></div>
-
-<p>The Sultan informed him in reply that he would
-never accept peace, and he would refuse to listen to any
-<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">pourparlers</i> on this subject, and that he did not hesitate
-to declare that any man who should contemplate such
-a step was far from being a true patriot.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat Pasha, seeing that peace was impossible,
-returned to London, where he never wearied of striving
-by every means in his power to be of assistance to his
-country. The Sultan, on his side, was doing his best to
-vilify Midhat’s name in his own capital, and it is this that
-elicited the following letter from him to the Grand Master
-of Ceremonies, Kiamil Bey.</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>To Kiamil Bey, Grand Master of Ceremonies.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Dear Sir</span>,&mdash;I am thoroughly aware of how anxious
-you must be to avoid a correspondence with me in my
-present disgrace, but I must ask your indulgence for the
-few lines that I find myself obliged to address to you.</p>
-
-<p>“It has been brought to my knowledge that the
-publication of a letter in one of the newspapers of
-Constantinople has given rise to various attacks directed
-against me. I know very well that if an exile, instead
-of seeking for indulgence and pity, dares to make use
-of the language of criticism as to the acts of the
-Government, in such a way as to provoke the enmity
-of certain personages, he will not even be able to avoid
-hurting his friends. But as these observations only relate
-to the defence of my own personality, it would be better
-to pass them over in silence, for there is no greater
-crime than to be occupied with one’s own individuality
-whilst the State is in the midst of such serious dangers.
-I believe that no one who has studied my letter can
-deny that it only contains the absolute truth. If there
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_167" id="Page_167">167</a></span>is a certain crudeness to be found therein, it comes from
-the truth of the words. If I have been able to remain
-indifferent to the attacks of my enemies, who for more
-than a year have done their best to injure me in the
-eyes of His Majesty by inserting articles and pamphlets
-against me in the newspapers, it is also in my power to
-bear with patience the vexatious attacks against my character.
-But no one must be surprised that the right of
-nationality which I possess in common with thirty‐six million
-fellow‐countrymen prevents me from keeping silence whilst
-our country is in the midst of such terrible vicissitudes,
-and our Ministers are involved in such great difficulties.
-Yet time presses, and the perilous situation, which has
-been dreaded for more than forty years, draws nearer
-and nearer. It is therefore the duty of every child of the
-country to let his complaint be heard and to lay his fears
-before his Sovereign. Those to whom the door of access
-to the Sovereign is closed must naturally employ every
-possible means by which their words may reach him. It
-is high time to realise that to place the truth before a
-Sovereign is an act of fidelity, and to hide it is a felony.
-Recent events have successively shown us the faults of
-those who are opposed to the wise measures which had
-been recognised by our Sovereign as necessary to save
-the Nation and the Government, and, putting aside all
-personal enmity, I am tempted to believe that they will
-profit by the goodwill of our august Sovereign and
-devote all their efforts to the good of the country. I
-end this letter with a request to you to be indulgent
-towards my expressions, which are free from all adulatory
-emphasis.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>27 Zilhidje 1294, Hegira.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>November 1877.</i>)</small></p></div>
-
-<p>The Sultan, beginning to fear lest his former Grand
-Vizier’s sojourn in Europe should prove a danger to him,
-decided to recall him. We publish the following correspondence
-which passed between the Grand Master of
-Ceremonies and Midhat Pasha on this subject, and which
-resulted in the return of the latter to Turkey and his
-tragic death. Midhat committed a great error in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">168</a></span>
-accepting the reversal of his exile, an error which has
-cost the Party of Reform at the very least twenty years
-of progress.</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Letter from Kiamil Bey, Grand Master of Ceremonies, to
-Midhat Pasha, in exile.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;His Majesty having questioned
-me some time ago on Your Highness’ situation, I replied
-that you were wandering, sad and dispirited. As to
-your means of subsistence, I stated that you were living
-on what you borrowed. His Majesty, on whom these
-facts made the deepest impression, and who was much
-touched, shed tears and wished to send Your Highness
-at once the sum of £T1000, to provide for your absolute
-necessities. But I took the liberty of saying that it was
-first of all necessary to ask how the money should be sent,
-and also if you would wish to appoint someone to draw it&mdash;and
-then to act accordingly. What I have just related
-to you is only known to His Majesty, Your Highness, and
-to me, and must be kept secret. His Majesty even went
-so far as to say&mdash;‘The poor man was deceived.’ As to
-Your Highness’ present situation, it may come to a happy
-termination through a correspondence with your humble
-servant, according to the Imperial desire. I shall await
-with impatience the immediate reply of Your Highness to
-this letter, as well as a letter of thanks for the favour which
-Your Highness has received from His Majesty.</p>
-
-<p class="right">“I am, etc.,<span class="h">xxxx</span><br />
-“<span class="smcap">Kiamil</span>.<span class="h">xx</span></p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>13th‐25th November 1293</i> (1877.)</small><br /><br />
-
-“<i>P.S.</i>&mdash;His Majesty repeatedly enjoined that all
-that I have just told you should be kept secret.”</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Letter from Midhat Pasha in reply to Kiamil Bey, Grand
-Master of Ceremonies.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">My very dear Sir</span>,&mdash;I have received your letter of
-November 13th. I was at first surprised and astonished
-to find that a friend, who ever since my departure from
-Constantinople had taken care not to send me even a
-simple greeting, should now have the courage to write
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_169" id="Page_169">169</a></span>me a letter with his own hand; but after having read it
-I understood the motive. Thank you for having wished to
-attract the Imperial kindness towards me, and for having
-replied&mdash;‘He wanders, sad and dispirited’ to the question
-that His Majesty kindly put to you. But at the same
-time I must point out to you that these words are used
-for the unhappy and the bewildered. If His Majesty has
-sent me away from Constantinople and exiled me to Europe,
-it was in order to put an end to the calumnies which were
-spread against me in Constantinople, where my presence
-caused a certain amount of anxiety. As it is neither in
-keeping with the dignity of the State nor yet with the
-Imperial will that a man who has occupied the highest
-rank in the Government, and who has so frequently
-received the public proofs of the Imperial favour, should
-be treated as one who wanders bewildered through foreign
-countries, I think you would have been nearer the truth
-and also have better pleased His Majesty had you said,
-‘Midhat Pasha has retired to Naples, where he is praying
-for the happiness of the Sultan.’</p>
-
-<p>“As to the rest of your letter, I must beg you to
-excuse me before I begin to comment on it. You know
-that I am the son of Hadji Echref Effendi, and that I have
-no other protector than God. I have worked very hard to
-acquire knowledge and virtue, but I have not succeeded.
-I own that my capacities and accomplishments are inferior to
-those of my colleagues. Now, if under these circumstances
-I have still been able to reach a rank so much above my
-merits, it can only be thanks to my plain dealing; and
-all the difficulties that I have met with during my life, are
-entirely due to my having spoken the truth.... What
-has happened, and to what is it due that I have
-been deceived? It was necessary that there should be a
-Sovereign at the head of the State after the Sultan Abdul
-Aziz, and, in accordance with the law, he was succeeded by
-the Sultan Murad. He became ill&mdash;was deposed&mdash;and,
-still in accordance with the law, the Sultan Abdul Hamid
-ascended the throne. It has been recognised that he
-manifested a sincere desire and also the necessary
-capacity to lead the State into the paths of progress; he
-showed much esteem for everyone, and his esteem and
-benevolence for me were prodigious. In the report which
-the late Mustapha Fazil Pasha laid before the Sultan
-Abdul Aziz, it is stated that the truth is always the last
-to gain admittance into the palace of Sovereigns, and
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_170" id="Page_170">170</a></span>indeed this is the case. But the more dangerous the word
-of truth, the more profitable is the result when it is spoken
-to the Sovereign in the hope of serving the State. This
-is the reason why, subordinating my private opinions to
-the public interests, I have never failed to speak the truth,
-and have never hesitated to point out clearly which was
-the way of salvation, and which path would lead to the
-destruction of our country. Men of evil intention have,
-I know, made use of this as a weapon against me, but all
-the events of to‐day are proving one by one how just were
-my words. Unhappily, there are certain personages who,
-instead of trying by every means to save their country
-in the present dangerous situation, think only of their
-own private interest, and desiring to preserve their prestige,
-have committed serious faults, which are incompatible with
-humane feeling and quite impossible to correct. And by
-these acts not only have they created a bad name for
-themselves, but they have been the principal cause of
-the destruction of the empire. I can, however, only
-be grateful to His Majesty, and ever since my departure
-from Constantinople, wherever I have been, I have never
-ceased to repeat with fervour how good are His Majesty’s
-intentions. Those who know the constancy of my words
-and deeds will realise that there is no other course possible
-to me. My most ardent desire at present is to see my
-country delivered from the horrors of war&mdash;my own
-personal consideration can only hold a secondary place
-in my thoughts.&mdash;I am, dear Sir, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>28th November 1293, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>10th December 1877.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Letter from Kiamil Bey, in reply to Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;I hope that Your Highness has
-perfectly recognised from the tone of my letter from what
-source it came. I was expecting to hear some expressions
-of gratitude from Your Highness, but your reply
-has in no way fulfilled this expectation, and you have
-ruthlessly exposed the real state of affairs without giving
-the least consideration to the shades of meaning in my
-expressions. This has been a great grief to me, and has
-diminished the hope I had of seeing you aiding the course
-of progress. In certain circles it is suggested that Your
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">171</a></span>Highness may be waiting for a change in the Khalifat.
-I have been in Egypt for some months for change of air,
-and if you should wish to answer me, I would beg you to
-address your letters to me in Egypt.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Kiamil</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>24th December 1293, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>6th January 1878</i>).</small></p></div>
-<hr />
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">172</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER VIII<br /><br />
-
-<small>THE RETURN OF MIDHAT PASHA TO TURKEY</small></h2>
-
-<p><span class="smcap">After</span> having received the most sympathetic welcome in
-Europe, and above all, in London, during a period of
-seventeen months, Midhat Pasha yielded to the Sultan
-Abdul Hamid’s invitation and returned to Turkey, thereby
-disregarding the wise advice given him by his friends
-both at home and abroad, but declaring that he would
-sooner die in his own country than in a foreign land.
-He refused to accept any office, and only desired to be
-allowed to live quietly with his family, far from all
-politics and public affairs. He fixed upon Crete as his
-place of residence. During his exile in Europe he had
-seen the Sultan Abdul Hamid enter into the paths of
-despotism&mdash;giving power to those men who had done
-nothing in the past, and banishing from the capital all
-those who were his partisans and who had striven
-to establish a rule of justice and of progress. He had
-seen his country menaced by every danger, and had
-observed the manœuvres of those ambitious statesmen
-who only sought for their own personal interests in the
-Sultan’s despotism and in their country’s decadence. He
-had seen the destruction of all he had worked for, had seen
-the Constitution he had done so much to establish deprived
-of every authority, and become only a name in the official
-records.</p>
-
-<p>The position that Midhat occupied after his return<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">173</a></span>
-to Turkey, may be considered as an exile imposed upon
-him by the Sultan. Abdul Hamid was anxious to keep
-him in Turkey, but at the same time did not dare to
-keep him there in inactivity, fearing lest the leader of
-the Liberal Party should once more begin to occupy
-himself in obtaining the necessary measures for opening
-the Chamber of Deputies. He was well aware that
-Midhat, as the Governor of a province, would devote
-himself entirely to its re‐organisation, and would therefore
-have no time in which to concern himself with central
-administration. Thus, in accepting the Governor‐Generalship
-of Syria and of Smyrna, it will be seen that
-Midhat played no political <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">rôle</i>. Forced as he had been
-to accept these posts, he occupied himself completely in
-their administration and in the good management of
-their current affairs, thoroughly realising his position as
-an exile.</p>
-
-<p>Before returning to Turkey, Midhat Pasha went to the
-Island of Crete, as his future residence. The Sultan
-granted his request, and sent a cruiser of the Turkish
-Fleet to Syria, which landed him at Candia on 11th
-September 1878; the Imperial yacht <em>Fuad</em> was also
-commanded to transport his family to the island.</p>
-
-<p>The Cretan population, Mussulmans and Christians
-alike, gave him the warmest and most cordial of welcomes;
-the foreign fleets which were in the bay fired salutes
-when he disembarked.</p>
-
-<p>This enthusiastic reception, this spontaneous manifestation
-on the part of the foreign fleets, made the very worst
-of impressions on Abdul Hamid, whose fears were, moreover,
-increased by the continual intrigues of Midhat’s
-enemies. At one time there was some question at
-Constantinople of nominating Midhat Pasha as Governor‐General
-of the Island of Crete. One of his friends (an
-English subject, whose name we may not divulge) sent<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">174</a></span>
-him the following letter, written at the invitation of the
-British Ambassador, Sir Henry Layard:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Constantinople</span>, <i>3rd October 1878</i>.</p>
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;I have had an interview with
-our Ambassador this morning. His Excellency assures
-me that for the last four months he has tried by every
-means in his power to act on the Sultan’s mind, in order
-to persuade His Majesty to believe in your fidelity and
-devotion to his throne. Sir Henry Layard has assured
-me that he has incontestable proofs, that whilst Your
-Highness was in power, a certain individual, who dined
-every evening at your table, was in the pay of General
-Ignatieff, and repeated to the General every day all that
-you had said the night before. His Excellency has asked
-me to tell you that His Majesty is always surrounded by
-Russian emissaries, who do all in their power to influence
-him against you, and therefore he is obliged to use the
-greatest prudence in speaking to His Majesty of Your
-Highness. The Ambassador expressed to me his very
-great regret that you had refused to accept the thousand
-pounds that the Sultan had offered you. He also wished
-me to tell you, <em>in strictest confidence</em>, that there had been
-some question of nominating you Governor‐General of
-Crete, and that he prevented this nomination, being
-convinced that you would do no good in the Island, and
-that the insurrection instead of diminishing will only
-increase later on. Besides this, he told me that his desire
-is that Your Highness should occupy a higher post, where
-you would render very great services to the Government.
-He said that he was very anxious to meet you somewhere
-and to speak with you, but that at the present moment
-he sees no possibility of such an interview; in the meanwhile,
-if Your Highness would put yourself into correspondence
-with him, there is nothing that would give
-him greater pleasure than to receive news of you.</p>
-
-<p>“Such, Your Highness, is the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">résumé</i> of our conversation.
-I left with the conviction that the Ambassador sees
-the immense difficulty of introducing any reforms into
-the country without Your Highness’ co‐operation. Your
-opinion on the policy of England, and on the manner of
-introducing reforms into this country, would, I am sure,
-be very much appreciated by his Excellency, and there<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">175</a></span>fore,
-if you see fit to write to the Embassy, you may count
-on my honour that no one in the world will know that you
-are in correspondence with Sir Henry Layard.&mdash;I am, etc.”</p></div>
-
-<p>No event worthy of record took place during the
-short time that Midhat passed in the island of Crete.
-As he had wished, he lived peacefully in the midst of his
-family, not occupying himself directly with the affairs of
-State.</p>
-
-<p>At the end of a month, Midhat Pasha received a
-telegram from the Palace, which nominated him Governor‐General
-of the vilayet of Syria. He was compelled to
-accept this new post, and embarked with his family on
-board the Imperial yacht <em>Fevayid</em> for Beyrout.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">176</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER IX<br />
-
-<small>MIDHAT PASHA, GOVERNOR‐GENERAL OF SYRIA</small></h2>
-
-<p>The arrival of Midhat Pasha in Syria was greeted by the
-population with as much enthusiasm and sympathy as in
-Crete. Compelled to accept this new position, Midhat,
-without losing hope of obtaining better results, and without
-taking into consideration that this post of Governor‐Generalship
-was a distinct loss of position after the high
-posts which he had occupied, began at once to study
-the general situation of the country, and the improvement
-which it would be possible to introduce there, as he had
-already done in the other vilayets. He introduced the
-most urgent reforms in the administration, which he
-discovered to be in a state of complete anarchy. He
-founded a School of Arts and Crafts, and an Orphanage,
-he increased the public safety, constructed high‐roads,
-which diminished the long distances that separated
-the capital of the vilayet from the outlying districts,
-and contributed to the construction of a line of tramways
-which connected the town of Tripoli, in Syria, to the
-port of Mina.</p>
-
-<p>However, the population of Syria, composed as it
-is of people of diverse races and religions, who are
-always at enmity with each other, had preserved their
-ancient manners and customs. The overwhelmingly
-difficult task of creating a complete union between all
-these jarring elements, and of strengthening the Ottoman
-Supremacy in the country&mdash;where the minds of the popu<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_177" id="Page_177">177</a></span>lace
-were excited by foreign influences&mdash;consisted at first
-in the re‐organisation of the administration, in Judicial
-and Financial Reforms, and, finally, in insisting upon the
-absolute integrity of the officials.</p>
-
-<p>Meanwhile, the Sultan Abdul Hamid allowed his
-original bitterness against Midhat Pasha to increase, and
-although addressing the most flattering words to him, he
-refused to sanction every single scheme of reform brought
-forward by him. The more the people showed their very
-great sympathy towards the Governor‐General, so much
-the more furious was the Sultan at his growing popularity.
-In order to prevent Midhat from gaining the friendship
-of the people by introducing the required improvements,
-Abdul Hamid took care to appoint as officials in Syria
-those men who would be capable of opposing his projects
-on every side. Such was the hostile conduct of the
-Marshal Ahmed Eyoub Pasha, who was in command of the
-Fifth Army Corps, and also of General Djémil Pasha.</p>
-
-<p>The absence of harmony which existed between the
-officials of the province, and the Sultan’s delay in sanctioning
-his schemes, finally obliged Midhat to tender his
-resignation in the following telegrams, to which the Sultan
-replied in the most hypocritical language.</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>To Ali Fuad Bey, H.M. First Secretary.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“Worn out, physically and mentally, by a service to the
-State which extends over nearly forty years, and taking
-into consideration my old age, which renders me incapable
-of serving any longer, I beg His Majesty, as a favour,
-graciously to accept my resignation of the Governorship
-of Syria, and to allow me to return, as soon as possible, to
-my house at Constantinople, or to Metelin, or else to some
-habitable district of the Syrian coast, where I may settle
-down with my family and spend my remaining years.&mdash;I
-am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>7th October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>19th October 1879.</i>)
-</small></p></div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">178</a></span></p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>To the Grand Vizier, Saïd Pasha.</i><a name="FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" class="fnanchor">22</a></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“Having reached a condition, when mentally and
-physically I can render no further services to the State,
-I had some weeks ago prepared my resignation and was
-going to send it in, for urgent reasons, when your nomination
-to the Grand‐Vizierat retarded my action. But the
-appointment of Mahmoud Nedim Pasha<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id="FNanchor_23_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_23" class="fnanchor">23</a> to the Ministry of
-the Interior has decided me to present it at the Palace. I
-inform you of this in advance, so that my resignation,
-following on your appointment as Prime Minister, may not
-be misinterpreted. I beg you will support my petition,
-and be my intermediary in helping me to get permission
-to end my days in some suitable place, with my family.&mdash;I
-am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.”</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Reply from H.M. First Secretary.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;His Majesty has taken note
-of Your Highness’ resignation of the Governorship of
-Syria.</p>
-
-<p>“The success which has attended Your Highness in
-the vilayet of Syria has been reported to His Majesty
-by Sir Henry Layard, who has just returned from his
-travels in Syria. His Majesty was on the point of sending
-you his congratulations, and of asking you what measures
-should be taken for the application of those reforms in
-which you encounter some obstacles. The arrival of
-your resignation has caused regret to His Majesty. You
-declare that the principal reason of your resignation is
-your advanced age, but as Your Highness is well aware,
-the longer an official has served, so much the greater will
-be his experience and his competency. Now, just at the
-moment when the State is on the point of reaping the
-fruits of Your Highness’ long experience and high efficiency,
-your decision to withdraw from public affairs cannot
-agree with the sentiments of your well‐known patriotism,
-and His Majesty would not, at present, be able to reconcile
-himself to placing on the unattached list, a servant as
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">179</a></span>capable and experienced as Your Highness. Consequently,
-the reasons of your resignation are not admissible. His
-Majesty orders me to beg that you will address yourself
-directly to the Palace, if you have complaints to formulate.&mdash;I
-am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Ali Fuad</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>10th October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>22nd October, 1879.</i>)</small></p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Reply.</i></p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>To Ali Fuad Bey, H.M. First Secretary.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Excellency</span>,&mdash;I have received the cipher telegram of
-the 10th October, 1295, and I humbly thank His Majesty
-for the questions which he has deigned to address to me;
-my request is occasioned by the weakness of my body and
-by the responsibility imposed upon me by the state of the
-vilayet. All the services of the vilayet are in disorder;
-the localities, as well as the population on the coast, are
-almost entirely under foreign influences, and the interior of
-the country, ever since the war, has been undermined by
-insurrections, which paralyse all the efforts of the State to
-bear on the abolition of the dissensions and revolts, in
-order to secure to the population a measure of repose and
-justice under the ægis of the State, by taking into consideration
-the exigencies of the localities and the requirements
-of the inhabitants. While this state of affairs exists,
-the enforced application in this vilayet of such reforms
-as those imposed in the vilayets of Konia and of Angora
-has only succeeded in alienating still further the population
-from the Government, and caused it to sympathise
-still more strongly with the foreigners. Moreover, even
-the power to assure the security of the Province is in the
-hands of the Military Administration, yet the responsibility
-thereof has been assumed by the Vali, which is not in the least
-in agreement with any known rule, and the disputes which
-may arise from this system can only add to the other
-mismanagements, and as the vilayet cannot go on for
-more than six months or a year in this manner, I find
-myself obliged to resign my functions. I am proud of
-sacrificing my life for His Majesty, in any service or
-in any country whatsoever. There exists only one means
-to effect the improvement of the state of the Province, and
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">180</a></span>that is the appointment of a capable and honest Vali, to
-whom would be accorded full power to apply all the administrative
-and financial reforms, as well as the works of public
-utility according to the exigencies of the locality and of the
-populace, and according to what was done in the vilayet of
-Bagdad, the military force must be placed in the hands of
-the Vali in order to concentrate all the converging powers
-to this sole aim. I only venture to make these proposals
-on the strength of the invitation given me by the Imperial
-command.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>11th October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>23rd October 1879.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Telegram in reply, from H.M. First Secretary.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;Your reply telegram, which has
-only just arrived, has been submitted to His Majesty, who
-was much gratified to hear that you declare yourself proud
-to be able to sacrifice your life in His Majesty’s service.
-I have been ordered to communicate the imperial compliments
-to you, and to inform you that in two or three days
-someone from the Palace will start for Syria, charged to
-furnish you with the instructions and Irades relating to the
-contents of Your Highness’ telegram.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Ali Fuad</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>12th October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>24th October 1879.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p>Thus it is seen that Abdul Hamid refused to accept the
-resignation of Midhat Pasha, but Midhat gave him the
-choice between his resignation and the desired reforms,
-and sent the Grand Vizier long schemes for the general
-re‐organisation of the province.</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>To the Grand Vizier, Saïd Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;Exhausted after a continuous
-service of the State of nearly forty years, and further
-weakened by my age which is nearly sixty, my sole desire,
-prior to my return from Europe, was to withdraw myself
-from all public affairs. The permission, which I obtained
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">181</a></span>from His Majesty, to live in the island of Crete with my
-family, was the favour which I most desired. But His
-Majesty, recollecting my former services and deigning to
-believe that I should be able once more to devote myself
-to the work, was graciously pleased to appoint me to the
-Governorship of Syria. Although worn out both mentally
-and physically, I could but bow in gratitude before the
-imperial will, and trusting in Divine support I took up my
-duties.</p>
-
-<p>“Thirty years ago I had already filled the office of
-Secretary in this vilayet, and twenty‐seven years ago I
-had been there on a temporary mission. Thus I had a
-certain knowledge of the manners of the inhabitants.
-Judge therefore what was my surprise, on my return
-there, to discover a complete change in the Administrative
-and Political Government of this province. As France
-was protecting the Lebanese, England found herself
-obliged to protect the Druses; the Americans were
-founding schools etc., in the Djebel Noussairi, in order
-to create there a sphere of influence for themselves.
-Whilst the Germans, under the name of <em>Colonies</em>, were
-peopling Palestine with German emigrants, the Spaniards,
-who cherished analogous schemes, had constructed a
-school and a church at Jaffa, in order that they might
-have their share. All these influences produced the
-very worst effect on the country, for one party of
-the Christians cherish a dream of union with Lebanon,
-whilst another party are seeking foreign protection, and
-meanwhile the Mussulmans can only marvel at the disorder.
-Now, although it is incumbent upon the State to
-reassure public opinion and to put an end to all these
-exterior influences, yet, on account of the exigencies of
-the war, the only orders sent from the Central Authority
-consist of demands for money, and for men for the Army.
-This state of things has opened the door to every abuse
-under the sun, and both law and order have been completely
-neglected. The officials of every rank, with some
-few exceptions, only seek their own personal interests, and
-the result of this, on the manners of the inhabitants, is so
-disastrous, that murders and robbery are the order of the
-day, and there is no security to property. To go no further
-than Tripoli, in Syria, during the last four years I myself
-have seen no fewer than ninety cases of murder, theft and
-pillage in the districts of Akiar and Safna alone; and not
-one single case has ever been brought to judgment. The
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">182</a></span>thieves and brigands remain unpunished or are released,
-whilst innocent people are detained, without being
-previously tried, and are subjected to penalties varying
-from eight to ten years. I have myself, this time, liberated
-several prisoners of this category, and I abstain from
-mentioning the administration of the districts dependent
-on the Kaimakam of Dehle.</p>
-
-<p>“As to the financial state of the province, it is most
-deplorable, and, as I have already had the honour of
-showing you, in a previous letter, the public revenues
-are reduced to one half; the country has been ruined
-by the tithes, and the depredations of the Army have
-desolated that which remained. The disastrous effect of
-the paper money having been to reduce the revenues by
-one half, one is appalled at the acknowledged deficit.
-This enumeration is a faithful <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">résumé</i> of the state of the
-vilayet, a state of which foreigners are the first to complain,
-whilst at the same time, they are just those who have
-the greatest political profits to gain from the continuance
-of these disorders. It is quite certain, that if this condition
-of affairs is not brought to an end, the Great Powers
-will place the administration of the vilayet of Anatolia
-in the hands of foreign officials, under the pretext of the
-introduction of reforms. And, as the schemes of foreigners
-for Syria are well‐known, to accept their conditions, based
-upon the maladministration denounced by the European
-newspapers, would only increase public opinion in their
-favour, and cause their pretensions to be sustained by the
-Cabinets of Europe.</p>
-
-<p>“Ever since my arrival, I have done all in my power
-to bring some order into the affairs of the vilayet and to
-avoid the dangers I have detailed above. With your
-support, the question of the central district might be
-arranged, but the improvement of the province is not even
-then accomplished. There still remains the great difficulty
-of establishing the financial condition of the vilayet on
-an equitable base, of improving the Tribunals, and, above
-all, of putting an end to the extortions of the officials,
-who, in addition to the loss they occasion to the Treasury,
-do still more to discredit the Government in the eyes
-of both the natives and of the foreigners. In a word, it
-would be necessary, at all costs, to reassure public opinion
-by the application of existing laws.</p>
-
-<p>“The actual state of things having reached this point,
-the laws, which are at present being deliberated upon in
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">183</a></span>the Council of Ministers, should be elaborated and applied
-in all the provinces of the Empire, taking into consideration
-the manners and customs of each province.</p>
-
-<p>“It would be a complete mistake to believe that this
-state of things can continue, and it is quite insupportable
-to me to know the remedy for the evil and yet not to
-be able to apply it, and above all to acquiesce wittingly
-in the harm caused by the present administration.</p>
-
-<p>“I feel myself obliged once more to submit the above
-observations to Your Highness.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>17th March 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>29th March 1879.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p>Abdul Hamid, however, although he promised Midhat
-to apply these measures of amelioration, which he considered
-indispensable, refrained from giving his sanction
-to them, and the troubles which broke out, in the middle
-of all this, between the Druses and the Arabs of Hauran,
-obliged Midhat to keep his office in order to prevent the
-conflict from taking a turn which might have led to foreign
-intervention. The causes of these troubles and the attitude
-of the Palace and of the Government are shown in the
-following correspondence with Midhat Pasha.</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Telegram sent to the Grand Vizier, by Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;It is necessary to give Your
-Highness details of the affair of Hauran, for which you
-ask in your telegram of the 3rd October. The Djébéli Druse
-(Druse Mountain) and the valley of Ledja are inhabited
-entirely by the Druses. Since the events in Egypt these
-people have completely lost all respect for the Government,
-to which they no longer furnish any troops, or taxes, but
-all the crimes and misdeeds committed in the neighbourhood
-arise from their insubordination and opposition to
-authority. Last year they captured the English post,
-and those people who attacked the caravan at Iki‐kapoulu
-this year, and killed two men, are also Druses. Some of
-the stolen cattle have been found at Djébéli Druse, but it
-has been impossible to punish the authors of the crime.
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">184</a></span>This district being exempt from all taxation, it has become
-the haunt of brigands, and of all those who wish to live as
-such; those who have committed a crime, deserters, or
-good‐for‐nothing Druses from Lebanon, all have sought
-refuge here for the last five or six years, until the mountain
-is crowded with them. It is they who attacked Hauran,
-put the inhabitants to flight, and up to the present moment
-they have conquered seventeen villages. They provoke
-quarrels and massacres for the most trivial causes, in order
-that they may be able to lay hands on other villages in
-succession. The Arabs of Hauran, having now adopted
-the Druse tactics, had entered into alliance, at the beginning
-of the present occurrence, with the inhabitants of
-Adjloun, of Kounitara, as well as with other Arab tribes,
-and were prepared to march against the Druses. The
-officials who were sent to the place were able to prevail
-upon the Hauranians, by their counsels, to abandon their
-plans and to obey the orders of the Government, but
-they insisted on those Druses who had been guilty of
-acts of brigandage being brought to justice and punished.
-The Druses, meanwhile, will listen to no representations,
-and remain with a force of several thousand armed men,
-in the face of the Hauranians. Although we learn that
-the Commandant of the troops which were sent, has been
-in communication with the Druses, in order to bring them
-back under control, we are not sufficiently well acquainted
-with the result, and for further details you should apply to
-the Marshal Ahmed Eyoub Pasha.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-<p><small>“<i>6th October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>18th October 1879</i>).</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Cipher Telegram from the Grand Vizier to Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;The English Ambassador has
-just been to see us, on account of the events which are
-taking place among the Druses, which he deeply regrets,
-and he has made the same communications to the Minister
-for Foreign Affairs. It is of course a well‐known fact
-that England offers a moral protection to the Druses,
-whilst France does the same to the Maronites. Whilst
-the English, on one hand, are scarcely pleased with the
-measures which have been adopted against the Druses,
-yet on the other side there are the representations made
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_185" id="Page_185">185</a></span>to Your Highness by the British Consul, to the effect
-that France would have to bring a formal complaint if
-the increasing looting by the Druses continues, as it is
-very hard on the Maronites. In short, although the
-Druses are behaving abominably, it is not in keeping
-with the justice of the State to leave them unpunished,
-and yet, although their system of brigandage dates from
-time immemorial, an opportune moment in which to teach
-them a lesson has never been found. Supposing that
-the troops sent to safeguard the security of the Empire
-were sufficient to end the whole affair, it is certain that
-the continuation of the conflict between the Druses and
-Hauranians could have no good result to the Empire.
-Consequently the best means, in our opinion, by which to
-put an end to this affair, consist in postponing the subjection
-of the Druses until the period of the complete
-re‐organisation of the vilayet, and we must resign ourselves
-to acting solely as arbitrators between the Druses
-and Hauranians, to bring about an amicable arrangement.
-Your Highness tells us that the Hauranians would refuse
-to accept the indemnity that the Druses offer them.
-This may at first sight seem a difficulty in the way of
-mediation by the Government, yet it is necessary to
-induce the Hauranians to accept this indemnity, in order
-to prevent the shedding of blood, and to avoid the
-multiplication of vexatious incidents which might bring
-on political complications.</p>
-
-<p>“If by chance the above arrangement cannot be brought
-about, Your Highness is then authorised to suggest to
-the Hauranians the total payment of the indemnity
-demanded by the State, informing the public that it is
-among the pacific intentions of the Government to have
-recourse to this solution of the matter, in the sole aim
-of abolishing the enmity which exists between its two
-subject races.</p>
-
-<p>“Necessary instructions as to the departure of the
-required troops have been given to the War Office.
-I think it is my duty to add, that in case the affair
-cannot be amicably arranged, it would be well to have
-recourse to the influence of the leading men on either
-side, this being a method, the efficacy of which has been
-already proved, and if it were necessary Your Highness
-might go in person to the scene of conflict.</p>
-
-<p>“In short, we beg that Your Highness will employ
-every means for conciliation, and we anxiously await the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">186</a></span>news of the closure of this incident, without having to seek
-the intervention of coercion.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Saïd</span>,<span class="h">xxx</span><br />
-“<i>Grand Vizier</i>.”</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>13th October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>25th October 1879</i>).</small></p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Reply from Midhat Pasha to the Telegram from the Grand
-Vizier.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;In reply to your telegram of
-13th October, it has been shown in my previous communications
-that the incident of Hauran was caused by
-a quarrel between the inhabitants of two villages, on
-account of a girl, and this quarrel spread until it attained
-its present serious proportions. Since it is quite impossible
-to remain a passive spectator in face of a force of between
-three and four thousand individuals, all armed and ready
-to kill each other, we first of all sent officials, then
-gendarmes, and finally regular troops, in order to prevent
-a collision between the two parties, and we ended by
-calling in the Sheiks&mdash;proposing that they should come
-to some amicable arrangement. The Hauranians thereupon
-insisted that those Druses who were guilty of
-having killed some of their tribe unjustly should be
-brought up to justice, or else, since they are the more
-numerous, that the State should permit them to march
-against the Druses. On the other hand the Druses
-declare that it is contrary to their customs to be given
-up to justice, and fearing lest they may thereby create
-a precedent, they refuse to surrender the culprits; at the
-same time they have taken up their position in front
-of the troops, and cut off the water‐supply that was
-used by the Army. They are thus prepared to offer
-a strong resistance, and at the same time are pillaging
-the villages which are inhabited by both Mussulmans
-and Christians. Yesterday they devastated four
-villages, killed two of the inhabitants, and after having
-wounded several others, they slew four more whom they
-met on the road. We have sent many special envoys
-to them, trying to impress upon them the necessity of
-surrendering at any rate some of the twenty‐five criminals
-to the Government, and they have at last consented to
-pay an indemnity, which was intended to go to the
-families of those men who had been assassinated. The
-Hauranians, however, will not hear of any such solution.
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">187</a></span>One thing is certain: it is quite impossible for us, after
-what has already occurred, to leave the Hauranians at
-the mercy of the Druses, without running the risk of
-creating very grave political and administrative dangers.
-Consequently, if Your Highness can succeed in finding
-any other method than that of the employment of an
-armed force, we shall do all in our power to execute it
-successfully.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>14th October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>26th October 1876.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Telegram from the Grand Vizier to Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;Since your advice coincides with
-ours that the Druse question should be amicably settled,
-it is necessary to take immediate steps towards obtaining
-a good result and preventing any recurrence of these
-incidents, and this without having recourse to military assistance.
-It would be very helpful to have the co‐operation
-of those who by their influence would be able to quiet
-down the minds of the people. Your Highness’ presence
-in these districts would create a good impression. We
-therefore beg that Your Highness will let us hear of
-your departure and of the means you intend to adopt.
-From the telegram from the Marshal to the Minister
-of War, it appears that the Druses have fired on the
-gendarmes whom General Djémil Pasha had sent to
-that district in order to try and re‐establish peace, and
-that on a Captain being killed, the gendarmes retaliated,
-and that a battle took place. As this is not at all
-expedient, Your Highness is particularly requested to
-put an end to all reprisals.</p>
-
-<p>“The Minister for War has stated that two battalions
-of regular troops, and three battalions of reserve (with
-munitions of war) are just starting for Beyrout, on the
-steamer <em>Mevridi‐Nousret</em>.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Saïd</span>,<span class="h">xxx</span><br />
-“<i>Grand Vizier</i>.”</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>16th October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>28th October 1879.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Reply to the Grand Vizier from Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p><span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;The troops were not sent to
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">188</a></span>Hauran with the intention of fighting with the Druses,
-but, as my last telegram explained, more than four
-thousand men, from one part and another, had armed
-themselves and were prepared to attack, and as, under
-these circumstances, the Government was obliged to
-interfere, it was simply to prevent bloodshed and to procure
-justice for those who had been injured. Your
-Highness is not unaware that those officials, who were
-punished in 1276 (1860), owed their disgrace to having
-failed to execute their duty conscientiously.</p>
-
-<p>“Although the re‐establishment of order at Djébéli‐Druse
-might be obtained as the natural result of our
-action, yet for the moment, this would be of only a
-secondary interest; and since Your Highness recommends
-us not to force it to this point, it may be possibly obtained
-in the future.</p>
-
-<p>“It is as Your Highness remarks: the Druses having
-always lived in a state of brigandage, have been treated
-differently from others, and, until now, I have tried to
-manage them with due recognition of this fact. Some
-of the Druse Chieftains who were at Damascus have
-been sent to the disturbed districts on a mission of
-peace. But they only joined the others, and have committed
-criminal acts. Without taking into consideration
-the treachery of these men, our one aim has been always
-to find some means of ending this conflict without calling
-in the aid of the Military, and we were awaiting the
-reception of the Druse Chieftains from Mount Lebanon,
-who, through the negotiations of Rustem Pasha, had
-offered themselves as mediators between the belligerents.
-But yesterday, at a distance of only three‐quarters of
-an hour from the camp of the Imperial Army, the
-inhabitants of Hauran began once more to fight with
-those of Ledja. As soon as this news reached the camp,
-a company of gendarmes and two companies of regular
-troops were sent to the spot to try and separate them.
-But the Druses immediately fired upon the Imperial
-troops, killing two gendarmes and wounding an officer.
-On that, General Djémil Pasha joining them, with two
-companies of regular troops, the Druses killed a captain
-and fifteen soldiers, and the battle lasted until midnight.
-From a telegram that the Marshal Ahmed Eyoub Pasha
-received this morning, it appears that Djémil Pasha has
-returned to the camp, with all his troops.</p>
-
-<p>“After this incident the Marshal Ahmed Eyoub Pasha
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">189</a></span>gave the necessary orders to concentrate the remaining
-military troops. Holo Pasha will be sent, with a member
-of the Administrative Council of the vilayet, to try and
-persuade the belligerents to lay down their arms. But
-to bring this business to an end, with moderation, one
-will be obliged to drive the Druses from their positions
-in Hauran. The arrival of the promised troops is quite
-indispensable.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>17th October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>29th October 1879.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>The Grand Vizier to Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;The report of the Minister for
-War, and the telegrams which have been exchanged
-relating to the question of the Hauran Druses, have been
-read at the Council of Ministers. After some deliberation
-it has been decided to settle this question in a pacific
-manner, and to invite Your Highness to go in person to
-the affected districts, to hasten the departure of the troops
-which have been demanded, and that the Minister for War
-should give Marshal Ahmed Eyoub Pasha the necessary
-orders, so that he may be in agreement with the ideas of
-Your Highness. The importance of the Question and the
-wishes of the Sublime Porte being settled by the correspondence
-which has passed up to the present, Your Highness
-is requested to go to the camp and to bring this
-matter to a peaceful close.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">“<span class="smcap">Saïd</span>,<span class="h">xxx</span><br />
-“<i>Grand Vizier</i>.”</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>22nd October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>4th November 1879.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Reply from Midhat Pasha to the Telegram from the Grand Vizier.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;Since the Druse Question must,
-in conformity with His Majesty’s orders, be brought to a
-pacific termination, may I beg that you will leave to me the
-choice of means to be employed, and wait patiently for a
-few days longer. You may have every reliance that the
-matter will be ended without having recourse to arms, and
-in a manner worthy of the prestige of the State and of the
-Army.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>23rd October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>5th November 1879.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">190</a></span></p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>From Midhat Pasha to H.M. First Secretary.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Excellency</span>,&mdash;The Druse Question has at
-last come to an end, with the arrival of the Sheiks
-yesterday at Damascus. They are anxious to solicit the
-protection of our august master. The Government having
-insisted on the extradition of those individuals who were
-implicated in the assassinations of Basr‐el‐Houreiri, the
-four men who survived the skirmishes have been accordingly
-delivered up to the authorities, and they are now in
-prison, waiting to be brought before the tribunals. This
-fact is full of promise for the future, for, hitherto, the
-Druses have never been accustomed to deliver to the
-authorities those criminals who have sought refuge in their
-midst. I must now devote myself to the consideration of
-the future condition of the Druses, which is of great
-importance.</p>
-
-<p>“As there is now no further need for the battalions of
-Reserve, recently sent, they have been sent back, and we
-have decided, with the Marshal Ahmed Eyoub Pasha, that
-the battalions now at Hauran and at Damascus shall be
-returned.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>29th October 1295, O.S.</i>”<br />
-
-<span class="h">xxx</span>(<i>11th November 1879.</i>)</small></p></div>
-
-<p>Midhat Pasha, who had withdrawn his resignation, with
-the express purpose of not leaving the province in a state
-of turmoil, and in order to bring the Druse Question to
-a suitable and lawful termination, succeeded thus in re‐establishing
-peace, in a manner that was honourable to the
-Government, in spite of the unjustifiable conduct of the
-Sublime Porte and of the Palace. But Midhat, perceiving
-the impossibility of working satisfactorily with the Government,
-once more sent in his resignation, in the following
-telegrams:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Telegram sent to the First Secretary, enclosing the Resignation of
-Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“With respect to my proffered resignation of October
-last, His Majesty condescended to issue an Irade, which
-made me decide to wait patiently for some time longer.
-Now that the question of the Druses, which was the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_191" id="Page_191">191</a></span>reason of the refusal of my request, has been settled, and
-the conditions of the vilayet are absolutely normal, I
-humbly beg that my resignation may be accepted by His
-Majesty, on account of the reasons which render my
-position untenable.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>18th May 1296, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>
-(<i>30th May 1880.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>H.M. First Secretary to Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;Your telegram, dated 18th May
-1296, has been presented to His Majesty. If there has
-been any delay as to the departure of the personage who
-was charged to communicate the Imperial instructions to
-Your Highness, and to receive your exact replies, it has
-been occasioned entirely by the difficulty he has experienced
-in quitting his post. And it is very difficult to
-find any one who possesses the same qualities, to replace
-him. You must not attribute the non‐execution of
-the Imperial promise to any other cause. In your telegram
-you say that your resignation arises from causes which are
-not unknown to His Majesty. In one of your later
-telegrams these causes resolve themselves into two
-principal ones: of which the first consists in Your Highness’s
-advanced age, and the other in the difficulties you
-encounter in the Administration of the Province. The
-first reason cannot be accounted as valid, by a servant who
-is devoted to his country and Sovereign, and whose chief
-desire should be never to renounce the honour of serving
-the State. As to the extension of power, a special order
-will soon be published on the duties of Governor‐Generals,
-so that this second reason of your resignation will no
-longer have any force. His Majesty expresses a desire
-to know positively if Your Highness wishes to resign from
-any other cause, independent of those already cited.</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Ali Fuad.</span></p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>19th May 1296, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>
-(<i>31st May 1880.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Telegram from Midhat Pasha in reply to H.M. First Secretary,
-Ali Fuad Bey.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Excellency</span>,&mdash;Besides those causes cited in
-your telegram replying to my request for permission to
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">192</a></span>retire, I may also mention the difficulties presented by the
-application of the new laws, and the insults to which
-I am exposed on all sides, on account of which I find
-myself obliged once more to entreat His Majesty for his
-indulgence. As I said six months ago in one of my letters,
-I am firmly resolved to sacrifice my life in the service of
-His Majesty, and as my life is nearing its end, the few
-years that remain are of but little importance. But there
-is something that is dearer and still more sacred than life&mdash;that
-is honour.</p>
-
-<p>“It is quite possible that there may be some reason
-of which I am not aware, for the formalities which have
-occurred, and for the present situation, but, from my
-humble point of view, and from my most inward conviction,
-everything seems to combine to wound my honour,
-as much in what concerns the administration of the
-vilayet which has been confided to my care, as in my
-private capacity. Now, as it is pardonable that I should
-desire not to tarnish my honour, which I have preserved
-unspotted during a service of more than forty‐five
-years, I have decided to protest no longer, but to retire.
-I, therefore, take the liberty of once more referring this
-subject to our magnanimous sovereign.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>21st May 1296, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>
-(<i>3rd June 1880.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>To Midhat Pasha, from the First Secretary, Ali Fuad Bey.</i></p>
-
-<p class="center f09">[<i>Confidential.</i>]</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness’</span> telegram of 21st May, 1296, has
-been submitted to His Majesty. All the world knows how
-highly His Majesty has always regarded your honour, and
-Your Highness, from the Humanitarian point of view, can
-only recognize and approve the justice of this observation.
-For many years Your Highness has rendered the greatest
-services to the State, you occupy the highest rank in the
-Vizierat, and are one of the greatest dignitaries and
-Statesmen of the Empire, and His Majesty informs you
-that he will guarantee your honour and consideration, as
-well as your reputation.</p>
-
-<p>“If the difficulties, which you declare you have encountered
-in the application of the new laws, refer to the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_193" id="Page_193">193</a></span>judicial laws, that must arise from the incapacity of the
-officials in the Judicial Department. Without criticising
-the fundamental significance of the laws, Sir Henry
-Layard has also represented to His Majesty, in a report,
-the difficulty that would be encountered in applying these
-laws, for want of competent officials, and, although every
-one recognises the necessity of the adoption and promulgation
-of these laws and regulations, yet the rumour of
-Your Highness’ resignation has immediately given rise to
-criticisms, which were delivered here yesterday evening by
-several personages. As you know, one of the very first
-reforms, the execution of which is to be desired, and even
-the principal reform to be executed, is the re‐organisation
-of the Courts of Justice. But the difficulties involved in
-carrying out these reforms place the Government in a
-very awkward position. Your Highness is begged to
-draw up a note stating the changes that are necessary,
-in the opinion of Your Highness, who has so great an
-experience both in Civil Administration and also in
-judicial laws, and to place this note in the hands of a
-capable official&mdash;one who possesses your full confidence&mdash;that
-it may be presented to His Majesty. You will also
-make use of this capable official, possessing your confidence,
-in your correspondence with the Palace. As our
-principal aim must be always to serve the State and our
-Sovereign with all fidelity and devotion, Your Highness is
-requested not to pay any attention to tale‐bearing, which
-is unworthy of any consideration, and not to allow yourself
-to be affected by it. His Majesty appreciates your actions,
-and sends you his friendliest Imperial greetings.</p>
-
-<p class="center">
-“I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Ali Fuad</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>23rd May 1296, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>
-(<i>5th June 1880.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Midhat Pasha to Ali Fuad Bey.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“The most precious and the most welcome part of
-your telegram of 23rd May being the expression of the
-Imperial goodwill towards me, I must first of all offer
-you my humble thanks. As to the other matters, your
-Excellency is not unaware that not only do I recognise
-in principle the necessity and the benefit of the new laws,
-but I am, above all, one of the chief advocates of judicial
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_194" id="Page_194">194</a></span>reform. As was mentioned in the Imperial telegram
-conferring the Governorship of Syria upon me, the local
-manners and customs must be taken into consideration
-with regard to the new organisations. But the new laws,
-instead of embodying these recommendations, have been
-drawn up on exactly the old lines, and when I suggest that
-with a slight modification these laws might be ameliorated,
-my observations are systematically ignored. This state of
-things has produced a result quite the opposite of that intended,
-and the greater part of the new laws, as well as the
-older ones, remain in disuse. The general situation is
-therefore most strange and peculiar.</p>
-
-<p>“To this disorder must be added the difference which
-exists between the civil and military authorities, which
-have ended by becoming hostile to each other. A country
-such as Syria, which is full of troubles and intrigues, both
-internal and external, is in crying need of a military force,
-yet every time that we demand an armed force we meet
-with a deliberate refusal, or the troops which have been
-sent are withdrawn without reason, or else our official
-letters remain unanswered. Now, although it is possible
-that this results from the inimical system which has
-been adopted against me personally, yet, undoubtedly, the
-Government and the country are the principal sufferers
-from it; and when it comes to six months passing without
-the governor and the marshal of a vilayet meeting, one
-can imagine the state of affairs in the province. Again,
-the grant for the gendarmes and the salaries of the officials
-having been reduced, these measures have struck a blow at
-the security of the country, and have driven the officials to
-corruption, whilst the judicial system which has been
-adopted by the tribunals towards criminals has weakened
-public confidence. This state of things being well known,
-the orders which arrive daily never fail to put all the
-responsibility on the Governor. Now, it is impossible to
-accept this situation, nor can I, in a telegram, give an
-explanation of all these difficulties, but, in conformity with
-the Imperial Irade, a confidential official is on the point
-of starting, commissioned to give you the amplest information.
-I shall strive for patience until his return.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>25th May 1296, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>
-(<i>7th June 1880</i>).</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p>Quite apart from all this question, the Sultan Abdul<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_195" id="Page_195">195</a></span>
-Hamid was far from being satisfied with Midhat Pasha’s
-sojourn in Syria. The Syrians, realising the good that
-he had done to the country, were loud in their expressions
-of gratitude, which gave offence to the Sultan. The cries
-of “Long live Midhat Pasha!” in the streets, and the
-interviews of the British Ambassador, Sir Henry Layard,
-with the Governor‐General during his travels in Syria, all
-augmented the fears of the Palace. Midhat’s enemies
-then put into circulation the rumour that Syria would
-soon become an autonomous principality, and that Midhat
-Pasha would receive the title of Khedive.</p>
-
-<p>Abdul Hamid then informed Midhat that he declined
-to accept his resignation, that he wished to see him
-continue his services to the State, and that he appointed
-him Governor‐General of the vilayet of Smyrna. The
-Syrians addressed a petition to the Palace, begging that
-Midhat might remain at Damascus, but the Sultan paid
-absolutely no attention to this act on the part of the
-Syrian population, and Midhat found himself compelled to
-start off for his new post on board the Imperial yacht
-<em>Izzeddine</em>, which had been sent for that purpose.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">196</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER X<br /><br />
-
-<small>MIDHAT, GOVERNOR‐GENERAL OF SMYRNA</small></h2>
-
-<p><span class="smcap">The</span> vilayet and town of Smyrna were then, like other
-provinces of the Empire, in a state of lamentable disorder.
-It is quite certain that the Sultan, who had refused to
-apply the necessary reforms in Syria, had never sent
-Midhat to Smyrna with the intention of putting a stop
-to the administrative anarchy existing in that part of
-his dominions. Midhat, although well aware that the
-aim of all these machinations was only to paralyse his
-activity, could not forget the duties and responsibilities
-which the Governor‐Generalship placed on his shoulders.</p>
-
-<p>There were a quantity of liberated convicts of every
-foreign nationality in Smyrna, who daily committed all
-manner of theft and crime; the sense of terror in the
-province was so great that no one dared venture abroad
-in the streets after night‐fall. Midhat Pasha formed a
-corps of police, in imitation of the European police, a
-force which at that time did not exist in Turkey
-apart from the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">gendarmerie</i>. He showed the same
-activity here as in the other vilayets, and succeeded,
-after several arrests, in establishing public security. He
-widened the streets of the city, and founded a School of
-Arts and Crafts, as well as an orphanage, which still exists
-under the name of “Islahané.”</p>
-
-<p>On the other hand, the Sultan never renounced his
-aim of ridding himself of Midhat, and four or five months
-after his arrival in Smyrna, Abdul Hamid decided to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_197" id="Page_197">197</a></span>
-strike a mortal blow at him, in once more raising the
-question of the sudden death of his uncle, the ex‐Sultan
-Abdul Aziz, whose suicide in the Palace we have already
-related (see p. 89). This suicide had not only been
-verified by eye‐witnesses, but also by the report of all
-the doctors of the foreign embassies at Constantinople,
-and above all by the statement of Dr Dickson, doctor
-at the British Embassy, a fact which has been confirmed
-by Sir Henry Elliot, who was the then English
-Ambassador, and who wrote an account of the deposition
-and suicide of Abdul Aziz, which appeared in the
-February number of the <cite>Nineteenth Century</cite> in 1888.
-Now, after a lapse of four years, the Sultan asserted
-that his uncle had not committed suicide, but that
-he had been assassinated, and that the murder had
-been perpetrated by Hussein Avni Pasha, the Minister
-for War (who was himself murdered in Midhat’s house,
-in 1876, by Cherkess Hassan), and by his two brothers‐in‐law,
-Mahmoud Djelaleddin and Nouri Pashas, and that
-<em>other personages of high rank</em> (an allusion to Midhat,
-Mehemet Rushdi Pashas, and to the Sheik‐ul‐Islam&mdash;Haïroullah
-Effendi) were implicated in the affair. In
-fact the two brothers‐in‐law, Mahmoud Djelaleddin and
-Nouri Pashas, were arrested in Constantinople, and the
-news of a fresh trial of the assassins of Abdul Aziz
-was noised abroad by the European Press.<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_24" class="fnanchor">24</a></p>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_198" id="Page_198">198</a></span></p>
-<p>The Turkish Press, inspired from the Palace, addressed
-praises to the Sultan, and some newspapers&mdash;amongst
-others the <cite>Terdjumani Hakikat</cite>&mdash;actually went so far as
-to advise Abdul Hamid to arrest every one who had
-played any part in the affair of Abdul Aziz.</p>
-
-<p>By this time the Sublime Porte had lost all authority,
-and the enemies of the Constitutional Party had increased
-very considerably. Mehemet Rushdi Pasha, the former
-Grand Vizier, and colleague of Midhat, had been condemned
-to pass his remaining years on his estates near
-Manissa; the Sheik‐ul‐Islam, Hairoullah Effendi, a
-follower of Midhat, had been exiled to Mecca. The few
-Liberals who remained in the capital had all been sent
-away into the provinces, either as officials or as exiles.
-Only the partisans of Abdul Hamid and those who had
-changed their opinions and who now ranged themselves
-on the side of despotism&mdash;such as Ahmed Midhat Effendi&mdash;were
-to be found in Constantinople. Ahmed Midhat
-Effendi, who had been one of Midhat Pasha’s most ardent
-followers, now heaped all the lowest slanders upon him,
-through the pages of the <cite>Terdjumani Hakikat</cite>, asserting
-that Abdul Aziz had been murdered, and that the culprits
-must be arrested.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat Pasha was in receipt of the most alarming
-news from his friends at Constantinople, and also from
-abroad; he was told that his life was in great danger. His
-only reply was: “I have no reason to be alarmed nor to fly
-from Turkey. I have laboured for the good of my
-country, and I have nothing with which to reproach
-myself; if others see reason to blame me, I am always
-ready to reply before a tribunal.” He took no further
-steps than to write a letter to the Grand Vizier, protesting
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_199" id="Page_199">199</a></span>against the baseness of Ahmed Midhat Effendi, Editor
-of the <cite>Terdjumani Hakikat</cite>. The letter is as follows:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>From Midhat Pasha to the Grand Vizier.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Your Highness</span>,&mdash;The number of the <cite>Terdjumani
-Hakikat</cite>, dated 5th December, 1296, after stating that
-the Editor of a newspaper, published at Athens, and
-directed against the Imperial Government, is Essad
-Effendi, who was exiled to Damascus, but who has since
-sought refuge in Greece, goes on to insinuate that in
-producing this paper he has my moral and pecuniary
-support. The same week, explanations are given in
-the <cite>Messenger</cite>, both in French and English, of these
-calumnies, and this is done in the most peculiar manner,
-my name being mentioned. The baseness of the Editor
-of the <cite>Terdjumani Hakikat</cite> is well known to the whole
-world. As to Essad Effendi, all who have seen him
-at Damascus will be able to estimate these erroneous
-publications at their true value. I think there is no more
-for me to add on this subject, for if I said anything, it
-would be according to the rules to bring an action. But
-these publications are not only hostile to me personally.
-It is beyond all question that the publication, in a
-foreign land, of a newspaper, directed against the Imperial
-Government, with the material and moral aid that I am
-reported to have furnished, constitutes a crime; consequently,
-how can you leave such a man at the head of
-so important and vast a vilayet as that of Smyrna? Such
-a state of things does much to destroy the prestige of the
-State, and all the more so, because of the confirmation
-of these slanders by the newspapers of Constantinople,
-which are under the orders and surveillance of the
-Sublime Porte. It seems to me wiser to send in my
-resignation, than to give rise to such a state of affairs,
-so that the honour and consideration of the State may
-be preserved intact. This course is, moreover, in keeping
-with the decision, reached by me some time ago. Nevertheless,
-I feel it my duty that I should first of all seek
-Your Highness’ advice on the subject.&mdash;I am, etc.,</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>25th December 1296, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>
-(<i>7th January 1881.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">200</a></span></p>
-
-<p>However, the Sultan, who wished to put an end to
-Midhat, decided finally to arrest both him and Mehemet
-Rushdi Pasha, who was then at Manissa. The arrival in
-Smyrna of the aides‐de‐camp, General Hilmi Pasha and
-Colonel Riza Bey (at present Minister of War), with their
-suites, gave the first warning to the Governor‐General,
-who ordered his men to watch the acts and movements
-of these aides‐de‐camp, and very soon reached the
-conviction that these emissaries had come with an order
-to arrest him.</p>
-
-<p>Among the men who had been charged by Midhat to
-get the aides‐de‐camp to talk about the manner in which
-the arrest was to be made, was a police agent, an
-extremely intelligent man, who, disguised as a rich
-merchant, was lodging in the same hotel as Hilmi
-Pasha, chief of the mission. Hilmi Pasha, at the end
-of a good dinner, had allowed to the pretended merchant
-that he had come to Smyrna by the Imperial command,
-and that his object was to arrest the Governor‐General,
-but that he was waiting for further instructions before
-carrying out his instructions. Midhat, in order to be
-prepared for any occurrence, had ordered a secret door
-to be made, and one of the steamers of the Compagnie
-Joly was retained in the harbour, ready to carry him
-off abroad. One evening the above‐mentioned agent
-came and warned him that Hilmi Pasha had been
-called to the Telegraph Office, and that, after a long
-conversation with the Palace, he had re‐entered the hotel,
-had put on his uniform, and gone straight to the barracks.
-It was asserted that among the orders he had received,
-he had been instructed to kill Midhat and to massacre
-his family. Indeed, one of Midhat’s servants, named
-Nezir, had been bribed, and it was arranged that before
-the Governor’s house was occupied, he should fire off a
-revolver on the troops, and thus give the signal for the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">201</a></span>
-massacre. In support of this theory, it is interesting to
-note that after Midhat Pasha’s exile the said Nezir
-entered into the service of the Yildiz Kiosk, and received
-a considerable salary. Besides this, one of the chamberlains
-of the Sultan Abdul Hamid, Bessim Bey, who died
-some time ago in disgrace, whilst still in the service of
-the Palace, assured a member of Midhat’s family that
-Hilmi Pasha was not only entrusted with the arrest
-of Midhat, but that the Sultan had given him a positive
-order to have him killed in the tumult which was to be
-adroitly brought about, and to massacre his whole family,
-men, women and children. It was on this account that
-General Hilmi had bribed Nezir, so that the public might
-believe that Midhat had refused to obey, and that he had
-fired upon the soldiers.</p>
-
-<p>On the receipt of this news from his agent, Midhat
-Pasha, without losing his <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">sang‐froid</i>, sought out his family
-and acquainted them with the position of affairs. He
-advised them to be resigned, and informed them of his
-intention of quitting Turkish soil from the moment that
-his life had been threatened. As midnight struck, three
-cannon‐shots rang out from the barracks (in Turkey this
-is the method employed for giving the alarm of fire), but
-Midhat understood only too well that it was done with the
-express purpose of distracting the attention of the mob.
-At the same moment he left his house by the secret
-door, accompanied by his secretary, and stole down to
-the quay; but perceiving that the quays were blocked by
-sentinels, he hailed a carriage, and recollecting that the
-English Consul, Mr Dennis, was not in the town, he told
-them to drive to the French Consulate, and there begged for
-protection. Meanwhile, the soldiers, who had forced their
-way at the point of their bayonets up to the doors of the
-first floor, now demanded to speak with Midhat Pasha,
-and were informed that he had just left. This reply being<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">202</a></span>
-absolutely unexpected, they were convinced that he was
-hiding in one of the rooms. Hilmi Pasha gave orders
-that the house should be searched, and that all the
-servants should be thrown into prison. The troops entered,
-breaking down the doors, and recommending the ladies
-not to move, they made an exhaustive search, even tearing
-up the flooring. At this moment, by way of fulfilling his
-cowardly promise and giving reason for a massacre,
-Nezir, hiding himself behind a mattress, tried to fire off
-his revolver, but one of the servants, realising the peril, tore
-the weapon from his hand.</p>
-
-<p>After a minute search that lasted for several hours, and
-during which no trace of either Midhat nor yet of his papers
-had been discovered, Madame Midhat, seeing that the
-officers and soldiers had no intention of withdrawing,
-sent for General Hilmi and informed him that in the
-case of the troops remaining in the house, she would
-open the windows and call in the help of the people.
-This terrified the General, for he had received orders not
-to give rise to a revolution, and he dismissed the soldiers,
-only remaining himself with one or two officers. A
-few hours later the police informed General Hilmi that
-Midhat was at the French Consulate, and he thereupon
-went thither, and had it surrounded on every side. The
-French Consul‐General, Monsieur Pélissier, had sent a
-telegram to the French Ambassador at Constantinople,
-informing him of all that had taken place. On seeking
-refuge at the French Consulate, Midhat had invited the
-consuls of all the Great Powers to attend; had acquainted
-them with the danger from which he had escaped, and had
-begged them to insist on a guarantee that he should be
-judged by a High Court. Meanwhile, he received a telegram
-from Constantinople begging him to surrender, and assuring
-him that no injustice should be done him, but that if
-he refused to do so, then he would be considered guilty.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">203</a></span></p>
-
-<p>There are two versions given of this memorable
-occurrence of the spring of 1881; and these two versions
-are so much the more important, because they affect
-the truth of the fact whether the Government of the
-French Republic delivered up Midhat Pasha, who had
-sought refuge in the French Consulate, to the Sultan, or
-whether he surrendered of his own accord on receiving the
-telegram from Constantinople. The fact that he had
-caused a secret door to be constructed in a hidden corner
-of his house, and that a steamer had been kept in readiness
-in the harbour, all proves that Midhat had intended flight.
-Not having succeeded in his design of reaching the sea,
-he had sought refuge at the French Consulate, and he
-had implored the assistance that France might easily have
-rendered him. It is to be presumed that the ambassador,
-after having asked for instructions from Paris, and having
-explained to the Government the Sultan’s insistence, may
-have informed Midhat that he could not effectually
-protect him. Not having any definite proof on this
-subject, it is impossible for us to certify anything. The
-opinions of the European Press were very divergent. We
-reprint the telegrams sent by the correspondent of the
-<cite>Times</cite> from Constantinople, dated 19th May and 21st
-May, 1881, which give the fullest details.<a name="FNanchor_25_25" id="FNanchor_25_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_25" class="fnanchor">25</a></p>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">204</a></span></p>
-<p>Midhat Pasha had been perfectly well aware of what
-would happen. He knew the plots that had been formed
-against him, and when his friends had invited him to
-leave Turkey, by the boat which had been got ready to take
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">205</a></span>him aboard, he replied, “I shall never give way before
-the insinuations of the Sultan. I shall never allow the
-world to say that I fled because I was guilty and that I
-feared the Sultan. I shall resist until the last moment,
-and if I then see that my life is in danger, I may perhaps
-have recourse to the means you offer.” It was this same
-state of mind which led him to think of embarking,
-when the soldiers, under the command of General Hilmi
-Pasha, surrounded his house, and by their attitude showed
-plainly the danger in which both he and his family were
-placed. On realising the impossibility of carrying out
-this plan, he had taken refuge at the French Consulate,
-and had asked the Consuls of all the Powers that their
-respective Governments should demand a public trial,
-and had declared “that he gave himself up to judgment,
-trusting to the good faith of the telegram which he had
-received from Constantinople.”</p>
-
-<p>For the honour of France, we are inclined to believe
-that Midhat surrendered to the Ottoman authorities of his
-own accord. It is scarcely credible that France would
-have delivered Midhat Pasha to the Sultan, the more so
-because Gambetta, who was then in power, had been a
-great friend of his.</p>
-
-<p>The Sultan had been anxious to have Midhat arrested
-when he was still Governor‐General of Syria, but so great
-was his popularity in that Province, that Abdul Hamid
-was reluctantly obliged to relinquish his design, for fear
-of provoking a revolution.</p>
-
-<p>The day following the arrest found the town of Smyrna
-still strictly guarded by the troops, and no one was
-permitted to go about the streets for fear of any demonstration.
-The terrified inhabitants closed their shops, and
-all business was suspended for twenty‐four hours. Midhat
-was retained as a prisoner in the barracks, until the
-arrival of the Imperial yacht, which brought over the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">206</a></span>
-new Governor‐General, the high judicial dignitaries, and
-also the Minister Djevdet Pasha. He embarked quietly
-in the midst of the general emotion, and duly arrived at
-Constantinople. Whilst waiting for the assembling of
-the High Court, the little pavilion in the “Yildiz Park”
-called “Malta Kiosk,” was assigned to him as his place
-of residence by the Sultan.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_207" id="Page_207">207</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER XI<br /><br />
-
-<small>THE TRIAL OF MIDHAT PASHA</small></h2>
-
-<p>As we have already stated, Midhat Pasha arrived at
-Constantinople in one of the Imperial yachts, accompanied
-by the Minister and the high judicial dignitaries. He
-was kept in the pavilion of the “Malta Kiosk,” which
-is situated within the park of Yildiz. In accordance
-with his desire that he might be given a public trial, and
-that the conditions on which he had surrendered to the
-Ottoman authorities from the French Consulate should be
-observed, a High Court was formed by the Sultan Abdul
-Hamid. But the tickets of admission to the meetings
-were issued in such a manner that the Turks who wished
-to be present at the trial had to renounce their intention,
-for fear of attracting the ill‐will of the Sultan, or else, those
-who were followers of Midhat, had to pose as his adversaries
-in order to be able to hear and understand the
-manner in which he was to be condemned. The Diplomatic
-Corps was present, but many foreigners found
-difficulty in obtaining admittance. Only a few correspondents
-of the foreign newspapers were admitted, and
-amongst the representatives of the Turkish Press only
-those who were faithful adherents of the Sultan.</p>
-
-<p>We possess no special information on the subject
-of the trial, and that which we have been able to collect
-from those persons who were present at the debates gives
-us no further details than those which the <cite>Times</cite> corre<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_208" id="Page_208">208</a></span>spondent
-(present at the Trial) sent to his newspaper.
-We publish, therefore, by permission of the proprietors of
-the <cite>Times</cite> the most interesting portions of their reports,
-together with some extracts from the debates in the Houses
-of Parliament on this subject, in order to give the reader
-some idea of this most memorable mock trial.</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<i>Constantinople, 28th June.</i>&mdash;The great State trial which
-began yesterday, and of which I have already forwarded
-you a summary of the proceedings, presented an interesting
-and picturesque spectacle. Around the Malta guard‐house,
-situated in a large open space immediately outside
-the Imperial park of Yildiz Kiosk, a goodly number of
-soldiers were posted at short distances from each other,
-and all persons not provided with a ticket of admission
-were prevented from approaching the building. The
-few who had been fortunate enough to obtain tickets,
-found on approaching the Guard‐House a large green
-oval tent, and adjoining it a considerable space enclosed
-by a canvas screen and covered by an awning. One side
-of this tent was occupied by a bench, on which sat the
-judges, three Mussulmans and two Christians, in black
-frock‐coats <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">à la Turque</i> and red fezes, presided over by a
-grey‐bearded Ulema called Sourouri Effendi, in a black
-robe and white turban. To the right and left of the
-judges sat the Public Prosecutor, the secretaries, and the
-subordinate judicial functionaries, and behind them stood
-several Imperial aides‐de‐camp and Palace servants.
-Below the bench, in a trench cut for the purpose, sat on
-cane chairs the ten prisoners, Mahmoud and Nouri
-Pashas (both brothers‐in‐law of the Sultan), two ex‐functionaries
-of the Palace, three officers of the Guard, two
-professional wrestlers, and a Palace watchman. Behind
-each of the prisoners stood a common soldier. The side
-of the tent facing the bench was left open, so that the
-spectators, seated on rows of chairs under an awning,
-immediately behind the prisoners, could witness the
-proceedings. Among the audience, comprising about one
-hundred and twenty people, were the Persian Ambassador
-and other members of the Diplomatic Body, several high
-officials in and out of office, a score of Imperial aides‐de‐camp,
-a few officers of the Palace, several Ulema
-in flowing robes and white or green turbans, and the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">209</a></span>representatives of the Press to a limited number. The
-spectators might have been considerably increased, for
-behind them were more than a hundred chairs unoccupied.</p>
-
-<p>“The first formality was the proving of the prisoners’
-identity, and immediately thereafter the indictment was
-read by three of the prosecutors, which may be briefly
-stated as follows:&mdash;A few days after the dethronement
-of Abdul Aziz, Mahmoud Damad, and Nouri Damad,
-engaged two professional wrestlers and a Palace watchman
-to assassinate their ex‐Sovereign, promising them £100
-each and a monthly pension of three pounds, as appears
-from the accounts of the Civil Lists. The crime was
-committed with the assistance of the Chamberlain, Fahri
-Bey, while Ali and Nedjib Beys, who had introduced the
-assassins into the Palace, mounted guard with drawn
-swords at the door of the room. As there was at that
-time a Supreme Commission, composed of Mehmed
-Ruchdi, Midhat, Hussein Avni, the Sheik‐ul‐Islam, and
-Mahmoud Damad, and as no important orders could be
-given without the concurrence of this Commission, it
-may be assumed that all its members must have been
-<em>cognizant</em> of Mahmoud and Nouri’s criminal proceedings,
-and it is for this reason that Midhat is among the accused.</p>
-
-<p>“When the indictment setting forth this theory had been
-read, the President, in a quiet and dignified manner, began
-to question the prisoners. The first called upon to state
-what he knew, was Mustapha, the wrestler, a man of
-ordinary size and not presenting any signs of abnormal
-muscular development. His face was of a common type
-and betrayed no symptoms of emotion as he related, in
-plain, unvarnished terms, how he had cut open the
-ex‐Sultan’s veins with a knife given to him for the purpose
-by Mahmoud Damad. His description, accompanied by
-slight and significant gestures, was brutally graphic, and
-made a strong impression on the spectators, more than one
-of the older men in the audience giving vent to their
-feelings of horror by audible exclamations. Mustapha’s
-account was fully confirmed by Hadji Mehmed Pasha,
-who declared that together with the Chamberlain Fahri Bey
-and Djezairli, he had hold of Abdul Aziz whilst the crime
-was being perpetrated. Djezairli, who had made a full confession
-in his preliminary examination, was then questioned,
-and retracted what he had previously said. Fahri Bey,
-a young man, with long fair moustache, delicately‐cut
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_210" id="Page_210">210</a></span>effeminate features, and of tall and slender build, was
-next examined, and denied the statements of the wrestler
-and his companion. In a tremulous tone, which gathered
-firmness as he proceeded, he described, from his personal
-observation, the mental condition of Abdul Aziz after his
-dethronement, and obstinately insisted that the dethroned
-monarch had committed suicide. The other prisoners,
-without endeavouring to explain how the Sultan’s death
-occurred, successively maintained their own innocence,
-and found more or less plausible answers for all the
-questions put to them by the judges. Mahmoud Damad
-Pasha, a tall stout man, with regular and handsome
-features and large dark eyes, found most difficulty in
-replying, and his deep gruff voice showed more than once
-signs of great emotion; but he denied emphatically and
-indignantly the accusations brought against him by the
-wrestlers and others. About two o’clock Midhat was
-introduced and took his seat by Mahmoud Damad’s side.
-His hair and beard had become much whiter since I last
-saw him, four years ago, and his complexion was still as
-morbidly florid as before, but he seemed well, and sought
-to conceal his emotion by stroking his beard, and arranging
-his notes, from which he was preparing to speak. Starting
-up suddenly and leaning on the back of his chair, he made
-a short speech, in which he declared himself happy to have
-been cited before the public tribunal, and he rendered
-justice to His Majesty’s sentiments of equity in causing
-the affair to be carefully examined. To all the questions
-about the Supreme Commission, of which he was a
-member, and which must have had cognizance of the
-intended assassination, he replied emphatically that such
-a Commission existed nowhere except in the imagination
-of his accusers, and that all matters of State were considered
-by the regular Council of Ministers. When
-reproached by the presiding judge for not having
-immediately ordered a searching inquiry, he admitted that
-he had been guilty of this sin of omission; but at the
-same time he maintained that all the other Ministers were
-in this respect equally guilty. On the subject of his
-having sought refuge in the French Consulate his answers,
-though extremely ingenious, were not so satisfactory.
-Unlike the other prisoners, Midhat withdrew from the
-Court as soon as he finished what he had to say, and after
-his departure a number of witnesses were called for the
-Prosecution. The chief of these were three young men
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_211" id="Page_211">211</a></span>who had seen the crime perpetrated in the way the
-wrestlers described, and the wife of a certain Ali Bey, who,
-being at that time one of the ladies of Abdul Aziz’ harem,
-had witnessed some of the incidents connected with the
-assassination. One of the most interesting witnesses was
-a frail, white‐bearded Mussulman, in an old‐fashioned
-costume, who related in a faltering voice, that he had
-washed the body of Abdul Aziz, and noticed a small
-wound in the region of the heart. The Court rose about
-half‐past seven o’clock without the witnesses having been
-cross‐examined. The proceedings will be continued, and
-possibly terminated, to‐day.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb">“<i>Constantinople, 28th June.</i>&mdash;The trial of the persons
-charged with the assassination of Abdul Aziz was resumed
-to‐day. After the counsel for the prisoners had concluded
-their addresses, the judges decided that the two prisoners
-Mustapha (the one a gardener and the other an athlete),
-Fahri Bey and Hadji Mehmed, were guilty of the murder,
-and that Ali Bey, Nedjib Bey, Midhat Pasha, Nouri Pasha
-and Mahoud Damad Pasha were accomplices, being privy
-to the crime. Sentence will be passed to‐morrow.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb">“<cite>Times</cite>,” <i>30th June 1881</i>.&mdash;“<i>Constantinople, 28th June.</i>&mdash;The
-second day’s hearing of the case against the persons
-accused of the murder of Abdul Aziz, the ex‐Sultan, lasted
-for eight hours. Several additional witnesses appeared
-for the prosecution. Among them was Ibrahim Edhem
-Effendi, who acted as intermediary between the Ministers
-and the ex‐Sultan, and who described the harsh treatment
-to which the latter was subjected.</p>
-
-<p>“The case for the defence was then opened. Four
-advocates appointed by the judicial authorities spoke very
-feebly on behalf of the prisoners. Mahmoud Damad was
-justly dissatisfied with his counsel, and defended himself,
-and, notwithstanding evident signs of illness, refuted some
-of the accusations brought against him. Midhat Pasha
-was then called, and the President Sourouri Effendi, after
-remarking that Midhat had accused him of personal
-enmity, retired from the bench, leaving his colleague,
-Christoforides Effendi, to direct the proceedings. The
-ex‐Grand Vizier, who had taken such a prominent part in
-the dethronement, defended himself for more than an hour
-against the charge of complicity in the assassination.
-Thoroughly conversant with the new laws of judicial
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_212" id="Page_212">212</a></span>procedure, he pointed out several mistakes which had been
-committed, and demanded permission to cross‐question
-the witnesses as well as the prisoners who had made
-confessions; but all his demands were refused by the
-Court. Finding himself thus fettered, he took his stand
-on the solemnity of the law, and declined to defend himself
-any further.</p>
-
-<p>“The President, after three times vainly inviting him
-to proceed, declared the hearing closed, and retired with
-the other judges to deliberate. Their verdict was, as had
-been foreseen from the beginning, that all the prisoners
-were guilty, but in different degrees. Four were declared
-guilty of premeditated assassination; five, including Midhat
-and the Sultan’s two brothers‐in‐law, were condemned as
-accomplices; and the two remaining prisoners were placed
-in the category of aiders and abettors.</p>
-
-<p>“The Court will re‐assemble to‐morrow morning to
-pass sentence. According to the Ottoman code, premeditated
-assassination entails capital punishment, while
-the lesser degrees of crime are punished by various terms
-of penal servitude.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>29th June.</i>&mdash;“The remarks and the bearing of Midhat
-Pasha at the trial yesterday produced, on the whole, a very
-favourable impression on the public, and it was not difficult
-to perceive that he still enjoys a certain popularity even
-among good Mussulmans. As numerous Palace spies
-were present, the Ottoman officials carefully endeavoured
-to hide any latent sympathy with the accused, but some of
-them did not altogether succeed. More than once Midhat
-replied very appositely in a half‐ironical tone, which was
-much appreciated by the audience. All the details were
-at once transmitted to the Sultan, and Sourouri Effendi
-doubtless congratulated himself on having removed the
-Imperial displeasure from his own shoulders to those of
-his colleagues. As yet no evidence has been produced
-proving Midhat’s complicity, but it is not likely that he
-will be acquitted. Considering that the trial has been
-prepared, and is being conducted under the immediate
-influence of the Palace, which is filled with Midhat’s
-enemies, it would be absurd to expect impartiality and
-independence in the judges. I happen to know many
-curious facts tending to show how absurd such an expectation
-would be, and I may mention one by way of illustration.
-Yesterday morning, immediately before the trial
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">213</a></span>began, Sourouri Effendi had a long private audience with
-the Sultan, and received from His Majesty certain instructions
-as to how the proceedings should be conducted.
-The most interesting part of the proceedings at the State
-trial yesterday was the incident which terminated in
-Midhat Pasha’s refusal to continue his defence. The facts
-are briefly as follows:&mdash;The President invited the accused
-not to continue his defence and to intrust that duty to his
-counsel. Midhat replied that he would defend himself,
-because he had not been allowed to confer freely with the
-counsel officially appointed. He justified his flight to the
-French Consulate at Smyrna, pointed out numerous errors
-in the procedure, expressed astonishment at such grave
-accusations being founded on such insufficient evidence,
-reproached the Public Prosecutor with having accepted the
-testimony of the eunuchs, who, professing to have seen the
-crime committed without denouncing it, should be themselves
-in the dock, and ridiculed the testimony of Marco
-Pasha, the chief physician of the Palace at that time,
-who professed to have seen from the Asiatic side of the
-Bosphorus what took place at the Palace on the European
-shore, and yet could not see a wound said to have been
-inflicted on the body of Abdul Aziz in the region of the
-heart. He then demanded that the Court should examine
-the prisoners and witnesses in his presence, as he was not
-present at the previous examination, and requested that
-the Embassy doctors who examined the body should be
-summoned, offering to defray the necessary expenses at
-his own cost, in order to compare their report with that of
-Marco Pasha. On the demand of the Public Prosecutor,
-the Court retired to consider Midh<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">214</a></span>at’s request, and decided
-to grant it on condition that the prisoners should not be
-interrogated separately. To this reply Midhat opposed
-the text of the Code of Criminal procedure, and demanded
-its application, declaring that he must question those who
-had given evidence, in order to prove that they had committed
-perjury. The President answered that the article
-in question in the Code referred to witnesses, and not to
-the accused, and declared that if any person had committed
-perjury it would be for the Court to punish them hereafter.</p>
-
-<p>“Midhat maintained that the prisoners who accused
-him should be regarded as witnesses against him, and
-considering, therefore, the decision of the tribunal as a
-miscarriage of justice, he declined to defend himself further,
-adding in a bitter tone, that he would derive little practical
-advantage from the punishment of a false witness after
-he was in his grave. The Court again retired for deliberation,
-and on returning after a few minutes, the President
-declared that Midhat’s request could not be granted. The
-prisoner, having three times declined to continue his
-defence, the President declared the proceedings at an end,
-and the Court retired to deliberate, returning after about
-an hour with a verdict of ‘Guilty’ against all the accused.
-The Court will meet again this morning at eleven o’clock
-to pronounce judgment, when this extraordinary, sensational
-trial, conducted as I reported, will come to a
-close.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>Later.</i>&mdash;“Judgment was delivered this morning in the
-cases of the persons convicted of the murder of ex‐Sultan
-Abdul Aziz. Nine of the accused, including the Sultan’s
-two brothers‐in‐law and Midhat Pasha, were condemned
-to death. The remaining two accused were condemned
-to penal servitude.</p>
-
-<p>“All the prisoners gave notice of appeal.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>Reuter’s Telegram.</i>&mdash;“<i>Constantinople, 29th June.</i>&mdash;The
-Court pronounced judgment and delivered sentence of
-death upon Midhat Pasha, Mahmoud Damad Pasha, Nouri
-Pasha, Ali Bey, Nedjib Bey, Fahri Bey, Hadji Mehmed,
-Mustapha the Wrestler, and Mustapha the Gardener.</p>
-
-<p>“Izzet and Sayd are each sentenced to ten years’ penal
-servitude. The prisoners have eight days allowed them
-to give notice of Appeal, and the indictment and document
-connected with the trial will be sent to the Court which
-will try the Appeal.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb">“<cite>Times</cite>,” 4<i>th July</i> 1881.&mdash;“<i>Constantinople, 1st July</i>.”&mdash;In
-telegraphing about the recent State Trial, I have been
-hitherto working under serious restrictions, which I was not
-allowed to mention in my telegrams. All telegraphic despatches
-on the subject had to be submitted to the authorities, who
-naturally prevented the transmission of anything that might
-be disagreeable to the Palace. In the circumstances, it
-was, of course, impossible to criticise the proceedings,
-or even to give a full account of what took place. I have
-now, fortunately, an opportunity of communicating with you
-freely, and I hasten to declare that the trial was little
-better than a parody of European judicial procedure, which
-has justly roused the indignation,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">215</a></span>
-not only of foreign observers, but also of many Turks,
-who have an elementary conception of justice and fair
-play. In a trial in which the political element was so
-prominent, the first condition to be observed was complete
-neutrality of the Palace, and this condition was most
-grossly violated. It was at the Palace that the preliminary
-investigation was made, under the immediate personal
-direction of the Sultan, who is an interested party. It
-was at the Palace that the prisoners were confined, judges
-chosen, and even the counsel for the defence appointed,
-without the prisoners themselves being consulted. It was
-at the Palace that the accused were examined and various
-unjustifiable means were employed to extort confessions
-from them&mdash;as, for example, when the Grand Eunuch,
-one of the three highest official personages of the Empire,
-struck with his fists and otherwise maltreated the Chamberlain,
-Fahri Bey, when under examination, in the presence
-of His Majesty. It was in the Palace, and under the
-immediate influence of the Sultan, that the amount of
-the punishment for the accused was considered and decided.
-It was in the Palace that Sourouri Effendi, the President
-of the Tribunal, had a private audience with the Sultan,
-immediately before the opening of the proceedings, while
-a Palace dignitary appealed to the counsel for the defence
-in a cajoling, half‐plaintive tone, to refrain, in the fulfilment
-of their duty, from adding to the Sultan’s already numerous
-embarrassments! Lastly, it was in the immediate vicinity
-of the Palace that the trial was held. Soldiers of the
-Palace garrison surrounded the Court, aides‐de‐camp and
-other Palace officials were present, while eunuchs and
-other confidential messengers were constantly passing to
-and fro between the Palace and the tribunal. A certain
-amount of publicity was allowed with regard to the trial,
-for a few tickets were distributed among the Diplomatic
-Corps and leading representatives of the Press, but there
-were at the same time serious restrictions and difficulties.
-The date of the trial was kept strictly secret until a few
-hours before the proceedings began, and newspaper correspondents,
-nearly all of whom are imperfectly acquainted
-with, or entirely ignorant of, the Turkish language and
-judicial procedure, were not allowed to take a dragoman
-with them, though three‐fourths of the space reserved for
-the public remained all the time unoccupied. I made
-personal representations on this subject to some influential
-officials, but they all declared positively that no more
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_216" id="Page_216">216</a></span>tickets could be given. To the few who were admitted,
-I must say the greatest courtesy and consideration were
-shown by the Imperial aides‐de‐camp and the masters of
-the ceremonies, but the powers of these gentlemen were
-very limited. With regard to the restrictions placed on
-telegraphing I have already spoken above.</p>
-
-<p>“It is hardly necessary to say, that with the all‐pervading
-influence of the Palace, there could be no
-independence or impartiality on the part of the judicial
-functionaries, and no zeal in the counsel for the defence;
-but there was something worse than this. The ardent
-desire of nearly all concerned to gain the Imperial favour
-by securing the condemnation of the prisoners in general,
-and of Midhat in particular, caused certain gross violations
-of the guarantees provided by the Criminal Code. I may
-mention a few facts by way of illustration. Sourouri
-Effendi, who had in the secret preliminary inquiry directed
-the case for the Prosecution, and who is well known to be
-one of Midhat’s bitter personal enemies, appeared at the
-trial as President of the Tribunal. He says, privately, by
-way of exculpating himself, that in the preliminary inquiry
-he never signed any official documents, and that during
-the trial of Midhat he ceded his presidency to one of the
-other judges; but these specious arguments increase rather
-than diminish his moral guilt. He refrained from signing
-official documents simply in order to avoid giving occasion
-for an appeal <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">en cassation</i>, and his making a distinction
-between Midhat and the other prisoners entailed new
-violations of judicial procedure, for it prevented Midhat
-from being present during a great part of the trial. Besides
-this, the distinction was more specious than real, for by
-procuring the condemnation of the other prisoners, he
-impliedly secured Midhat’s condemnation likewise; and
-though he did not sit on the bench when Midhat was
-present, he joined his colleagues in the consulting‐room
-when the ex‐Grand Vizier’s demand for permission to
-cross‐question the witnesses was considered and rejected.
-Not content with having a devoted adherent like Sourouri
-in the President’s chair, the Palace further controlled the
-proceedings by Raghib Bey, one of the Sultan’s private
-secretaries, and Djevdet Pasha, the obsequious Minister of
-Justice, who is one of Midhat’s personal enemies. These
-two personages sat behind the judges on a bench, and
-secretly gave directions in moments of hesitation and
-difficulty. I can state this without fear of contradiction, for
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">217</a></span>during one of the sittings I was myself on the bench, and
-carefully observed what was invisible to the audience.
-The conduct of the Public Prosecutor was naturally in
-keeping with that of the chief judge. I am assured by
-eye‐witnesses that he entered the consultation‐room when
-the judges had retired to consider their verdict, but as I
-did not see this with my own eyes, I refrain from drawing
-any conclusion. Another act of his, however, may be
-commented on, because it took place in public. Midhat’s
-attitude during the preliminary investigation seemed to
-indicate that he would seek to obtain the Imperial clemency
-by raising no difficulties, and by making no serious attempt
-to defend himself at the trial; and as none of the other
-prisoners were sufficiently conversant with the law to
-embarrass the Prosecution, it was hoped that the proceedings
-might be hurried through in a single sitting. These
-plans were prevented by Midhat’s energetic action on the
-first day of the trial, and it was then considered necessary
-to find some means of effectually crushing him. A
-convenient instrument was at hand in the person of a
-certain Rifat Effendi, who professed to have heard Midhat
-say one day in Damascus that it was necessary to put
-Aziz out of the way, because otherwise he might have
-returned to power and have strangled the Minister who
-had deposed him. As Rifat was not in the list of
-witnesses, he could not be called without due notice having
-been given to the Court; but the Public Prosecutor overlooked
-this little formality and called him next day.
-When Midhat heard this new and unexpected piece of
-evidence, he very soon disposed of it, and was at no pains
-to conceal what he thought of Rifat’s character, conduct
-and motive.</p>
-
-<p>“A few words now to show how the prisoners were
-treated. According to the Code of Criminal Procedure
-the accused has a right to choose his own advocate, and to
-have free communication with him. In the present trial
-the advocate was chosen by some anonymous personage in
-the Palace, without the accused having been consulted as
-to the choice, and free communication was not allowed.
-On this subject Midhat asserts that he saw his counsel
-only twice. On the first occasion they had only time to
-read about an eighth part of the indictment, and on the
-second they were favoured with the presence of Raghib
-Bey, one of the Sultan’s private secretaries, who listened
-to all that was said. Worse than this, with prodigious
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">218</a></span>ingenuity each advocate was entrusted with the duty of
-defending prisoners belonging to different categories and
-employing mutually contradictory modes of defence. Refik
-Effendi, for example, was ordered to defend on the one
-hand Mustapha the Wrestler&mdash;who confessed his own guilt,
-and accused Fahri of having taken an active part in the
-assassination&mdash;and on the other hand the said Fahri,
-who maintained that Abdul Aziz committed suicide. In
-like manner Shukri Effendi had to defend on the one
-hand Midhat, and on the other hand Nouri Pasha, who
-endeavoured to exculpate himself at Midhat’s expense.
-The idea of crippling the defence in this ingenious way is
-exquisitely Oriental, and rendered almost superfluous the
-half‐pathetic, half‐menacing exhortation made to the
-advocates at the Palace that they should refrain from
-adding to the Sultan’s numerous embarrassments and
-trust to His Majesty’s clemency. Equally Oriental and
-characteristic is the fact that the learned gentlemen who
-undertook the so‐called defence on such conditions,
-showed no signs of being ashamed of themselves. It is
-hardly necessary to say that they carefully abstained from
-cross‐questioning the witnesses and sifting the evidence,
-and did not object when the President and the Public
-Prosecutor assumed important facts without proving
-them.</p>
-
-<p>“With regard to the way in which Midhat was
-threatened, it is difficult to speak without using strong
-terms of indignation. Not a particle of carefully sifted
-evidence against him was produced, and he was refused
-means of defending himself against the unsubstantiated
-assertions of his accusers, though he proved from the
-Code that he was asking no more than he had a right to
-demand. If his sentence is carried out, his execution will
-be simply a judicial murder, perpetrated from motives of
-political vengeance and personal enmity. As for the
-other prisoners, I cannot pretend to say whether they
-really committed the crime with which they are charged,
-but I can unhesitatingly assert that their guilt was not
-legally proved.</p>
-
-<p>“The judicial inquiry, which has thus been brought to a
-close, was instituted, as I informed you at the time, for the
-purpose of removing and frightening possible conspirators,
-and thereby preventing a revolution for the future; but it
-may be doubted whether in the long run it will have the
-desired effect, for I noticed that even among Ottoman
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">219</a></span>subjects, surrounded by Palace spies, the feelings of
-indignation were sometimes stronger than those of fear.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>“Times,” 7th July 1881.</i>&mdash;“<i>Constantinople, 5th July</i>&mdash;The
-appeal of the prisoners condemned for the assassination of
-Abdul Aziz will shortly be considered by the Court of
-Review, and it is almost certain that in spite of the gross
-irregularities and flagrant illegality of the proceedings the
-sentence will be confirmed. Immediately after the close
-of the trial on Wednesday, the judges of this Higher Court
-were summoned to the Palace and received their instructions,
-which will, of course, be followed, irrespective of all
-considerations of justice and equity. The possibility,
-therefore, that the judgment may be annulled and a new
-trial ordered, may be left out of account, and the only
-practical question that remains is whether the Sultan will
-have the sentence carried out. For some days the general
-opinion at the Palace was that the nine who had been
-condemned to death would be all executed, but I have
-now very good reason to believe, as I informed you on
-Sunday, that those who did not actually take part in the
-assassination will have their sentence commuted to imprisonment
-for life at Taïf, near Mecca. This unexpected
-clemency is to be attributed, at least in part, to the
-excitement and indignation which the mode of conducting
-the trial has produced both in Pera and Stamboul. The
-Sultan learned that the Embassy Dragomans had unanimously
-condemned the proceedings as irregular; that the
-Ambassadors had telegraphed in this sense to their
-respective Governments; that the newspaper correspondents
-had unsparingly described and criticised the way
-in which the proceedings had been conducted, and that
-even in Stamboul, among good Mussulmans, the trial had
-produced an impression very different from what was
-intended. In these circumstances His Majesty perceived
-that it would be dangerous to have the sentence carried
-out, and he determined to commute it. At the same time,
-in order to counteract the conviction that the whole story
-of the assassination was an invention, rumours were propagated,
-through the local Press and other channels, that
-nearly all the accused had made partial confessions. The
-<cite>Vakyt</cite>, for example, published yesterday mutual recriminations
-between Mahmoud and Nouri, and to‐day those
-of Midhat and Mehemed Rushdi. All such stories must
-be accepted with great reserve, for they are certainly told,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_220" id="Page_220">220</a></span>and possibly invented, for the purpose of prejudicing
-public opinion against the prisoners. In spite of these
-efforts to supplement defective legal evidence, many
-people, and among them the mother of Abdul Aziz, and
-some of the doctors who examined his body, still hold to the
-conviction that there was no assassination and that Abdul
-Aziz committed suicide. Without endorsing this opinion,
-I can confidently assert that the trial has by no means
-cleared up the mystery. The semi‐official announcements
-that the <cite>Valide Sultana has thanked the Sultan for having
-brought the assassins to justice are untrue, for she has all
-through the inquiry obstinately maintained that her son
-perished by his own hand, and that she was partly to blame
-for having given him the famous scissors</cite>.”</p>
-
-<p>“I am now in a position to explain why the prosecution
-showed such anxiety to get Midhat condemned, and
-employed such unjustifiable means for this purpose. It
-may be remembered that some months ago the Sultan
-was greatly alarmed by a revolutionary propaganda, of
-which the chief instigator was believed to be the
-ex‐Khedive. A judicial functionary, who has since taken
-a prominent part in the trial, was ordered to make an
-inquiry, and came to the conclusion that Midhat was
-implicated in the propaganda. The conclusion was
-probably erroneous, but it made a strong impression on
-the Sultan’s mind, and from that moment Midhat’s fate
-was decided. As no legal proofs of his complicity in the
-seditious agitation could be produced, other means had
-to be employed for getting rid of him, and the regicide
-inquiry was used for this purpose.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>“Times,” 11th July 1881.</i>&mdash;“<i>Constantinople, 10th July.</i>&mdash;During
-the last few days representations have been twice
-made to the Sultan by the British Ambassador concerning
-the State trial. It is believed at the Palace that Lord
-Dufferin acted on the first occasion spontaneously, and
-on the second occasion by the express orders of Lord
-Granville. The later communication is said to be couched
-in strong terms, urging His Majesty for his own sake to
-refrain from carrying out the sentence of the tribunal.
-The Sultan has received also a telegram from the Ottoman
-Embassy in London, in which Musurus Pasha describes
-the unfavourable impression produced by the trial in
-England, and implores His Majesty to prevent at least
-the capital punishment being inflicted.”</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">221</a></span></p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>“Times,” 28th July 1881.</i>&mdash;“<i>Constantinople, 26th July.</i>&mdash;Since
-the judgment was pronounced at the State trial
-considerable hesitation and embarrassment have harassed
-the Sultan and given rise to numberless exaggerated and
-contradictory rumours, which I have thought it undesirable
-to report at the time of their production, because they
-were in some cases manifestly without foundation and
-in others largely improbable. During the last few days,
-however, an attempt has been made on the part of the
-Sultan to lessen his responsibility in the matter, through
-the instrumentality of a Grand Council, comprising the
-highest dignitaries of the State both in and out of
-office. The Council contained twenty‐seven members, of
-whom five were ex‐Grand Viziers, fourteen were Ministers
-in and out of office, and eight were Ulemas. We now
-hear that in that solemn assembly, which sat at the Palace
-for three days, opinions were divided, and finally an
-important minority courageously voted against carrying
-out the extreme penalty of the law, especially in the
-case of those of the accused who had not confessed, and
-against whom no positive proof of guilt had been elicited
-at the trial. This minority is said to have included
-most of the more prominent members, viz.:&mdash;four Grand
-Viziers and the present Prime Minister, three Ministers
-in the Cabinet, one of the most influential high ecclesiastics,
-and one former Minister. The majority is said to have
-voted in the sense of a confirmation of the judgment
-given at the trial, subject, of course, to the exercise of
-the Imperial clemency. It included ten Ministers in
-office, most of them specially antagonistic to Midhat
-Pasha, and seven Ulemas. The Sultan has chosen to
-adopt the opinion of the minority and to decide that
-the accused shall be banished for life. It is not quite
-clear why, in the circumstances, His Majesty should
-have chosen this course; for it was supposed that the
-Council had been called together with a view to make
-it share the responsibility of the signature of the death‐warrants,
-which His Majesty hesitated to sign without
-the direct sanction of the great officers of State. The
-repugnance of the Sultan to have criminals executed is
-well known, and since his accession he is said never to
-have sanctioned a single capital sentence. While securing
-the removal of the criminals to some distant and safe
-locality, where they will be powerless to work harm, he
-avoids at the same time the issuing of the fatal decree,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">222</a></span>so repugnant to his feelings. Much must be attributed
-to the action of our own Government. Brilliant, indeed,
-has been the commencement of the mission of Lord
-Dufferin, who has already gained much favour in public
-opinion here both native and foreign. Considering the
-popularity and prominent personal value of at least one
-of the accused Pashas, the impression that his life has
-been saved through the intervention of the British
-Ambassador tends to remove much of the popular clamour
-which had lately become so loud against British influence,
-and it is a significant sign of the times that one of the
-semi‐official Turkish organs publishes to‐day an article
-advocating a close alliance between England and Turkey.
-A few months ago this same officially inspired print
-loudly proclaimed that England’s friendship was more
-hurtful to Turkey than the enmity of any other Power.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>“Times,” 1st August 1881.</i>&mdash;“<i>Constantinople, 30th
-July.</i>&mdash;The Sultan is greatly disappointed with the result
-of the State trial. He expected that the proceedings
-would have received the approval of public opinion, both
-in Turkey and in Western Europe, and he finds that
-the reverse has been the case. The Court of Appeal,
-as I ventured to predict, confirmed the sentence; but the
-Ulemas, who are the custodians and expounders of the
-Sacred Law, made an evasive reply to the questions
-addressed to them, and in the Grand Council, composed
-of Ministers and other great personages, there was a
-large and influential section of members who recommended
-that the capital sentence should not be carried
-out. Both in the Assembly of Ulemas and in the Grand
-Council the proceedings were very curious, as showing
-that, even under the present reign of terror, there are
-a few men who have the courage to maintain openly
-opinions which they know to be unpalatable in the
-highest quarters. The obsequious Sheik‐ul‐Islam, for
-example, who wished to cover the illegal proceedings
-by art, encountered a determined resistance from the Mufti
-Emini, whose duty it is to give a written decision to
-any legal questions which may be addressed to him. The
-old man said in a calm decided tone: ‘During my long
-life, I have never willingly given an unjust decision,
-and now, when I have one foot in the grave, I shall
-certainly not begin to deviate knowingly from the path
-of right. The accused have been tried and condemned
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">223</a></span>by a Civil tribunal, according to laws and a procedure
-with which we have no professional acquaintance. If
-we are to give a decision, the case must be tried again
-from the commencement, according to the procedure prescribed
-by the Sacred Law. To the question as it at
-present stands, the Sacred Law provides no answer, and
-consequently no <em>fetva</em> can be issued.’</p>
-
-<p>“Similar courage was shown by some of the civil
-functionaries, especially Haireddin Pasha, who, with his
-usual frankness and fearlessness, condemned the proceedings
-of the Criminal Tribunal in no measured terms.
-The ex‐Grand Vizier, Safvet and Kadri, spoke more
-cautiously in the same sense. Osman, Mahmoud Nedim,
-and Djevdet, Minister of Justice, were in favour of having
-the sentence executed. Soubhi Pasha tried to find a
-middle course. He admitted that irregularities might
-have been committed by the Tribunal, but at the same
-time maintained that the Council had no power to reverse
-the decision. This argument was tersely refuted by
-Haireddin, who reminded his colleagues that they were
-called upon, not to reverse the decision, but simply to
-give advice regarding the exercise of the Imperial
-clemency. The Sultan, as you have heard, has commuted
-the capital sentence as far as his two brothers‐in‐law
-are concerned, on the ground that these personages acted
-according to stringent superior orders. In this way one
-of the objects for which the trial was instituted is attained
-more completely than by executing the accused, for the
-ex‐Sultan Murad, who is supposed still to have adherents,
-is thereby represented as being the real culprit.”</p>
-
-<p><span class="gesperrt">* * * * *</span></p>
-
-<p><i>Parliamentary Debates, 1st July 1881.</i>&mdash;“Mr <span class="smcap">M’Coan</span>
-asked the Under‐Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
-whether any other report than that published at the time
-had been received from Dr Dickson (page 90), physician to
-Her Majesty’s Embassy at Constantinople, and a member
-of the Medical Commission, who examined the body of
-the late Sultan Abdul Aziz immediately after his death,
-of the result of such examination, and, if there be, whether
-he will lay it upon the table of the House; and also,
-whether in the interests of justice and humanity, and
-in view of the report made at the time by such Medical
-Commission, it is the intention of Her Majesty’s Government
-to interpose its friendly good offices at the Porte,
-or directly with the Sultan, to save Midhat Pasha, and
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">224</a></span>any or all of the other persons convicted with him
-yesterday of complicity in the alleged murder of Abdul
-Aziz, from execution of the sentences severally passed
-upon them. He desired to express, before the question
-was answered, his absolute distrust of the capacity and
-probity of the members of the Turkish court which
-conducted the recent trial; and, from his own personal
-knowledge, he accepted all the responsibility of stating
-that they were persons not entitled to the respect of
-Europe, or of that House.</p>
-
-<p>“Sir <span class="smcap">Charles W. Dilke</span>&mdash;Sir, the substance of a
-report by Dr Dickson was laid before Parliament (<cite>Turkey</cite>,
-No. 3, 1876), and no further report has been received.
-Lord Granville is in communication with Lord Dufferin
-with regard to the recent State trial; but it would be
-premature to make any announcement at present.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>4th July 1881.</i>&mdash;“Earl <span class="smcap">de la Warr</span> asked the noble
-Earl the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether
-any information could be given with reference to the
-trial of Midhat Pasha, which was now proceeding at
-Constantinople. He was quite aware that this was a
-question of great delicacy as regarded interference on
-the part of Her Majesty’s Government; but it could
-not be otherwise than a matter of deep interest to their
-Lordships, and to the country generally, to know that
-all that was possible was being done to insure a just
-trial, as upon the issue of the trial might depend the
-life of a great and distinguished statesman.</p>
-
-<p>“Earl <span class="smcap">Granville</span>&mdash;My Lords, I have been in communication
-with Lord Dufferin on this subject, which is
-exciting great interest in Europe. Of the trial I have
-received no authentic report, and it would clearly not
-be right for me to express any official opinion upon
-it. I am not, at the present moment, able to give your
-Lordships any further information on the subject.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>7th July 1881.</i>&mdash;“Mr <span class="smcap">Staveley Hill</span> asked the Under
-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he had any
-information from Constantinople, with regard to the fate
-of Midhat Pasha.</p>
-
-<p>“Sir <span class="smcap">Charles W. Dilke</span>&mdash;I can give no information
-upon this subject. The telegrams which have passed, up
-to the present time, do not show what are Lord Dufferin’s
-views; but representations are being made.”</p>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">225</a></span></p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>11th July 1881.</i>&mdash;“Viscount <span class="smcap">Folkestone</span> (for Mr
-Staveley Hill) asked the Under Secretary of State for
-Foreign Affairs whether Her Majesty’s Ambassador at
-Constantinople has been instructed to call the attention of
-the advisers of the Sultan to the allegations of the grave
-irregularities in the trial of Midhat Pasha, and to urge
-upon His Majesty that the execution of that distinguished
-statesman upon the result of such a trial may be regarded
-as a judicial murder brought about by political rivals.</p>
-
-<p>“Mr <span class="smcap">M’Coan</span> asked the Under Secretary of State for
-Foreign Affairs whether the Christoferides Effendi who
-presided at the recent trial of Midhat Pasha is identical
-with the person of the same name who, in May 1871, was
-an employé of the Turkish Ministry of Police.</p>
-
-<p>“Sir <span class="smcap">Charles W. Dilke</span>&mdash;Sir, with regard to the
-first question, I have to say that this is a somewhat
-delicate matter. I have already said that communications
-are passing. Looking to the object which the hon.
-Member has in view, it would not be wise that I should
-make any public statement at the present time. The
-second question I must answer in the affirmative.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>21st July 1881.</i>&mdash;“Mr <span class="smcap">M’Coan</span> asked if there was any
-truth in the newspaper report of that day that Midhat
-Pasha was to be sent in exile to a place near Mecca.</p>
-
-<p>“Sir <span class="smcap">Charles Dilke</span> said that up to four o’clock that
-afternoon no telegram had reached the Foreign Office to
-that effect.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb"><i>22nd July 1881.</i>&mdash;“Mr <span class="smcap">M’Coan</span> asked the Under
-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if he had received
-any information with regard to the execution of the
-sentence passed on Midhat Pasha.</p>
-
-<p>“Sir <span class="smcap">Charles W. Dilke</span> said that within the last
-forty‐eight hours they had received no further information
-from Lord Dufferin on the subject.</p>
-
-<p>“Mr <span class="smcap">M’Coan</span> said in view of a telegram of peculiar
-significance published that morning, and which seemed to
-point to an almost immediate decision in regard to the
-sentence passed at the recent State trial at Constantinople,
-he must plead the urgency and gravity of the case if he
-trespassed upon the time of the House for a few moments,
-and would, if necessary, conclude with a motion. The
-case was, shortly, this:&mdash;One of the most noted figures in
-European politics, a statesman of the highest antecedents
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">226</a></span>and reputation (‘No!’), at least, for an Eastern statesman,
-had been tried in a way notorious to the House, and his
-life at that moment was trembling in the balance. He did
-not say that Her Majesty’s Government could bring any
-more pressure to bear on the Porte than they had done
-with reference to the subject. He was aware of the
-delicacy and difficulty, probably the impracticability, of any
-Government putting pressure upon the Sultan, except in
-the way of friendly intercession, which so far, had had no
-effect. He therefore now wished to elicit from the House
-its opinion in reference to the recent trial and the action of
-the Turkish Government with respect to it, and he had
-reason to believe that such expression of opinion would
-have the best possible effect at Constantinople. Midhat
-Pasha, after passing a distinguished official career, became
-Governor of Bulgaria, which he found overrun with
-brigandage, and in such a state that the revenue could not
-be collected. In a few months he put down brigandage,
-caused the revenue to be collected, and, under his rule,
-Bulgaria became one of the most prosperous provinces of
-the Turkish Empire. One of his most persistent opponents
-was the Russian Ambassador. Midhat was doing everything
-to revive European confidence in Turkey, and as
-that did not suit Russian views, General Ignatieff became
-his most persistent enemy, and intrigued against him.</p>
-
-<p>“Mr <span class="smcap">Newdegate</span> rose to order. He submitted
-that the Honourable and learned member was asking the
-House to give an expression of opinion upon a motion
-for adjournment, which was placing the House in a false
-position, because it was precluded by its own forms
-from giving an opinion on that subject on a motion of
-adjournment.</p>
-
-<p>“Mr <span class="smcap">Speaker</span> said that, as the House was aware,
-the only question on which the judgment of the House
-could be taken on the motion for adjournment was
-whether the House should or should not adjourn.</p>
-
-<p>“Mr <span class="smcap">M’Coan</span> said he would make his observations
-very brief. Subsequently Midhat Pasha became Governor
-of Bagdad. It was said by some that Midhat Pasha
-was a poor man, and therefore, presumably, an honest
-man; by others that he was a rich man, and therefore,
-presumably, a corrupt man; and he was sorry to say that
-a very high authority&mdash;the Prime Minister&mdash;had given
-expression to the latter opinion in an article he published.
-This, however, he knew: that though the revenues of the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_227" id="Page_227">227</a></span>provinces he governed, passed through Midhat Pasha’s
-hands, he returned from each of them a poor man&mdash;in one
-case not having sufficient funds to pay his own and his
-retinue’s travelling expenses, and in another not being
-possessed of £500. Afterwards he became Grand Vizier,
-and his famous Constitution elicited from Liberal
-politicians everywhere praise and admiration, and it was
-no fault of his that that admirable scheme did not
-become an organic law of Turkey. He failed in his
-efforts to reform the Administration, and to turn corrupt
-misrule into good government. Subsequently, both in
-Syria and Smyrna, he carried out the same principles
-of administrative reform. He was undoubtedly a party
-to the deposition of the Sultan; but it was widely believed
-that he was no party to his death, if he did not die by
-suicide. The Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
-had admitted that the Report of the Medical Commission
-was in favour of the opinion that the death was caused
-by suicide. Dr Dickson, the physician to the English
-Embassy at Constantinople, joined in that opinion, and
-had assured him (Mr M’Coan) that after the most careful
-examination of the body he was clearly of opinion that
-it was a case of suicide. But what happened at the so‐called
-trial? Why, that two of the doctors, who had
-as Commissioners certified that it was a case of suicide&mdash;Marco
-Pasha and Dr Castro&mdash;actually at the trial gave
-evidence to the effect that, in their opinion, death had
-been caused by murder. Such evidence was worthy of
-the tribunal before which it had been given. In a reply
-to a question put by him, the Under Secretary of State
-for Foreign Affairs had stated that the President at the
-trial had been formerly an employé of the Municipal
-Police at Constantinople, and that he had himself positive
-knowledge of the corruption of the man when he held
-a judicial position. He had also evidence, though not
-so direct, that this same person had continued to be one
-of the most corrupt judicial functionaries in the service
-of the Porte; and also evidence, less direct still, that
-the other members of the Court which tried the State
-prisoners were of no whit better character. No European
-community, therefore, would hang a dog upon the finding
-of such a tribunal. He knew that Her Majesty’s
-Government could not interfere directly, and that an
-unofficial or indirect appeal on the part of Her Majesty’s
-Ambassador might have no effect, but he was proud to
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_228" id="Page_228">228</a></span>know that no other opinion in Europe could have such
-an effect upon the Porte, or in the Palace, as that of the
-House of Commons, because it was thoroughly understood
-there that such opinion reflected that of the country, and
-so influenced the action of the Government. He begged
-to move the adjournment of the House, in the hope
-that such opinion would be expressed on behalf of an
-innocent, distinguished, and falsely condemned statesman.</p>
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">The O’Donoghue</span> seconded the motion.</p>
-
-<p>“Motion made and question proposed.&mdash;‘That this
-House do now adjourn’&mdash;(Mr <span class="smcap">M’Coan</span>).</p>
-
-<p>“Sir <span class="smcap">H. Drummond‐Wolff</span> said he would not follow
-the last speaker in criticising the trial that had taken
-place at Constantinople, a trial which he thought would
-not be considered satisfactory in this country. He would
-not make an appeal to the right honourable gentleman
-at the Head of the Government to interfere in regard
-to the trial; but he would remind him that upon more
-than one occasion the interference of the British Government
-had saved the lives of men who had been condemned
-to death in Turkey. He trusted that the Premier would
-see his way to take some steps to bring the influence of
-Her Majesty’s Government to bear upon the Porte, with
-a view of, at any rate, reducing the sentence passed on
-Midhat Pasha. He was a man of what was called a very
-liberal mind, and had discharged his duties in a remarkably
-impartial manner, and with much enlightenment, considering
-the difficulties under which he had had to labour. He
-ventured to suggest that the Premier would be doing a
-graceful act in using his great influence on behalf of this
-unfortunate man.</p>
-
-<p>“Mr <span class="smcap">Ashmead Bartlett</span> said it was remarkable to
-notice the intense interest taken in Turkish Pashas by
-the honourable gentleman, who had lost no opportunity
-hitherto of denouncing them. The trial had by no means
-been so unfair as was represented, and the evidence
-against most of the accused was very strong. Everyone
-sympathised with Midhat Pasha, who was a great statesman
-and patriot, and it would be a most unfortunate
-thing if the trial resulted in his death. He doubted,
-however, if there was any danger of that. The present
-Sultan was a most humane and kind‐hearted man&mdash;and
-neither Midhat Pasha nor the other two Ministers who
-were condemned with him were in danger of execution.
-He thought the question might be safely left to the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">229</a></span>discretion of Her Majesty’s Government without any
-formal expression of opinion by the House. It would
-be most unfortunate if any representations were made
-on behalf of the other condemned Ministers, Mahmoud
-Damad and Nouri Pashas, who were openly corrupt, and
-were guilty of almost every possible offence against the
-interests of their country and of civilisation. It would
-be a matter of rejoicing if they could be brought to
-justice. It would be better if representations were made
-diplomatically by the Government without the direct interference
-of the House; and although the influence of the
-British Government was much less than it used to be,
-he had no doubt they would have due effect.</p>
-
-<p>“Mr <span class="smcap">Gladstone</span>&mdash;I do not know that much advantage
-would be gained by a prolongation of the discussion. In
-answer to the appeals made, especially by the honourable
-Member for Portsmouth (Sir H. Drummond‐Wolff), I
-think I can state very briefly what is a very simple matter&mdash;namely,
-the limits of action laid down for us, and the
-fact that we have not scrupled to act within them. Those
-limits were necessarily narrow. I was sorry to hear the
-honourable gentleman who made this motion introduce
-statements of so pointed a character respecting the individuals
-who have been called upon to conduct the inquiry.
-He may be quite warranted in all he says; but it is
-perfectly impossible that we can know that, and it is
-perfectly impossible, in justice to those individuals, to go
-in this House into the circumstances of which he speaks.
-If the trial be bad, an attempt to re‐try the case in an
-Assembly of this kind, with the view to an expression of
-opinion on the definitive merits of the case, would likewise,
-be open to much objection.</p>
-
-<p>“The real state of the case is this&mdash;Have we a right of
-intervention in a matter of this kind? Clearly we have
-none. I use the words ‘right of intervention.’ But there
-are considerations of policy and humanity which have,
-on various occasions, led to representations, more or less
-formal, which are in the nature of interference with private
-affairs, but which are grounded on a sincere and dispassionate
-anxiety, in the first place, for the general
-principles of humanity and justice, and, in the second
-place, for the interests of the great Power in whose
-counsels you appear to intervene. Unquestionably, though
-we have no power to pass a final sentence on the nature
-of the proceedings in Constantinople, there has been a
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_230" id="Page_230">230</a></span>public opinion in regard to these proceedings, both in
-Constantinople and Europe generally, such as to make
-us believe that it would be greatly for the interest of the
-Sultan of Turkey were he moved to pursue a humane
-and liberal course. Recognising these facts, we have not
-scrupled to act upon them. So early as 4th July instructions
-were sent to Lord Dufferin to use the least
-obtrusive, but, at the same time, the most confidential,
-direct and effective means to make the kind of representations
-which we desired to be made. Lord Dufferin has,
-I think, with as much tact and delicacy as are in the
-possession of any man, and with, at the same time, as
-much good feeling and zeal, acted readily upon these
-instructions, and has, to the best of his power, made
-representations in the general sense I have described. We
-have no doubt whatever that a lenient and a considerate
-course will give satisfaction to the enlightened opinion
-of Europe, and will be greatly for the interests and peace
-of Turkey. Having said that, I think I had better add
-no more. I see no advantage in implicating or attempting
-to pass judgment on anyone. We have stood on the
-purely general consideration I have described; and I
-believe the House will be disposed to think, on the general
-statement I have made, that without any special merit
-on our part, we have discharged our duty.</p>
-
-<p>“Mr <span class="smcap">J. Cowen</span> said he was sure the House had listened
-with satisfaction to the humane and generous observations
-of the Prime Minister. He trusted his hon. friend, the
-Member for Wicklow, having elicited such an expression
-of opinion, would be content, and not push his motion
-to a division. He entirely sympathised with him in the
-course he had pursued. It was desirable that the British
-Parliament should have an opportunity of recording its
-opinion of the very exceptional proceedings under the
-name of law that had recently taken place at Constantinople.
-Midhat Pasha was a distinguished Turkish Pasha.
-He had served his country ably and honourably in the
-highest offices the Sultan could confer. He had proved
-himself to be a friend of England and of progressive
-principles. He (Mr Cowen) had the privilege of his
-acquaintance, and he could confirm the high character
-that the hon. Member for Wicklow had given him. He
-recognised the delicacy of the position, and he could
-appreciate the difficulties that the Premier had referred
-to. To interfere with the action of the Turkish Courts,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_231" id="Page_231">231</a></span>however they were constituted, might be regarded as
-trenching upon the freedom of an independent State. If
-representations were made in a too emphatic way, they
-might be resented by the Sultan, and have the very
-opposite effect than was designed. This was a possibility
-which they should all bear in mind, and of which the
-Government, no doubt, were conscious. They should
-remember also that it was impossible for the House to
-review the proceedings of the Constantinople tribunal.
-They might have their opinions; but they were not, and
-could not, be informed of all the details. But still,
-admitting all this, the English Government had on other
-occasions interceded with foreign rulers on behalf of fallen
-statesmen or popular leaders. There were many instances
-in history where there had been such friendly interference;
-and they had, therefore, the warrant of precedent for doing
-what was now suggested. He trusted that the Government
-would&mdash;with all the energy that they felt themselves
-justified in using, but at the same time, with the necessary
-friendliness&mdash;intercede on behalf of Midhat Pasha. The
-Prime Minister had said that instructions to that effect
-would be sent to Lord Dufferin, and the House and the
-country would feel satisfied that any appeal by him would
-be supported by a man of great ability, high character, and
-of generous spirit. Having called attention to the subject
-and made this representation, he would advise that the
-matter be allowed to rest in the hands of Her Majesty’s
-Government.</p>
-
-<p class="tb">“Mr <span class="smcap">M’Coan</span> asked leave to withdraw the motion.”</p>
-
-<p><i>29th July 1881.</i>&mdash;“Lord <span class="smcap">Stratheden and Campbell</span>,
-in rising to ask the Government whether their influence
-at Constantinople is being exercised to arrest proceedings
-in the case of Midhat Pasha, said he hoped that in
-the absence&mdash;which he regretted&mdash;of the noble earl the
-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, some member of the
-Government would be able to give an answer to his
-question. No doubt all the members of the Government
-knew what answer to give, because the Prime Minister
-really decided these matters, and his colleagues must be
-in possession of his views. The fate of Midhat Pasha
-was a question in which the people of this country took
-great interest. There was no doubt that he had not had
-a fair trial, and obstacles were put in the way of his
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">232</a></span>defending himself. There was little doubt that Abdul
-Aziz had put an end to his own life; and he thought that
-the public law of Europe, about which so much had been
-said of late years, should be put in motion on his behalf.
-It might be said that public law would be an obstacle to
-exercising influence to arrest proceedings in the case; but
-if that were so, public law had been set at nought by every
-ambassador whom the Queen had employed at Constantinople
-recently.</p>
-
-<p class="tb">“Lord <span class="smcap">Stanley of Alderley</span> said he regretted the
-course which the noble lord had taken as damaging to his
-consistency, since he usually respected the law of nations;
-but now he asked the Government to do something which
-was quite contrary to it. He was not only asking them to
-obtain a commutation of the sentence passed on Midhat
-Pasha, but to arrest proceedings. A month ago the noble
-lord intimated that the Foreign Secretary had not the
-control of the Foreign Office, but that the Prime Minister
-had; and the Prime Minister had stated in ‘another place’
-that this was a case in which the Government had no right
-to interfere. The noble lord should have been satisfied
-with that answer. When Midhat Pasha was Grand Vizier
-he was responsible for what was going on at Constantinople;
-and after the time that Sultan Abdul Aziz Khan’s
-death took place, he did not institute any enquiry into any
-of the circumstances that had surrounded it. No doubt, it
-was unfortunate that in the recent trial the Ottoman
-Government had adopted European forms, and it would
-have been better if the Turkish Government had followed
-their own forms of trial in this case. However, he had no
-doubt that substantial justice had been done to Midhat
-Pasha. The present question was, moreover, unnecessary,
-because the sentence had already been commuted, and
-Midhat Pasha was going into a healthy climate, where
-there need be no fear on account of his health. Midhat
-Pasha was a good administrator in Bulgaria, but he had
-been too much praised for what he had done, and, on the
-whole, he was an ignorant, rather than a learned man.
-However, in Midhat Pasha’s present situation, he would
-rather not make further observations upon his administration
-of affairs. There was no ground for any alarm in
-regard to the country to which he was banished.</p>
-
-<p class="tb">“The Earl of <span class="smcap">Kimberley</span> said he was sorry that his
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">233</a></span>noble friend the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs was
-not present to answer the question of the noble lord. As
-to the actual form of the question, he agreed with his
-noble friend opposite (Lord Stanley of Alderley) that
-it would be an extraordinary interference on the part of
-one Government to exercise its influence upon another,
-in order to arrest proceedings which the latter had thought
-it necessary to take in regard to an accusation against a
-subject of that Government. But probably his noble
-friend desired to know what course had been taken by
-Her Majesty’s Government in the whole matter; and what
-he had to say was that in a question of so much delicacy,
-involving the internal Government of the Porte, and
-touching the Sultan himself, Her Majesty’s Government
-had not thought that it would be desirable to exercise any
-direct advice or interference; but feeling, as they did, an
-interest in this matter, they had been able, through Lord
-Dufferin, in a perfectly private and unofficial manner, to
-express their wish that it might be the pleasure of the
-Sultan to deal with this matter in a merciful spirit. He was
-not in a position to state that it had been officially notified
-that the sentence passed upon the incriminated Pashas had
-been commuted; but he had good reason to believe that the
-statement in the newspapers alluded to, that the sentence
-had been commuted to banishment to Arabia, was true.”</p></div>
-
-<p>The result of the humanitarian intervention on the part
-of the English Government was that the death sentence on
-Midhat Pasha was changed to one of imprisonment for life.</p>
-
-<p>The Sultan Abdul Hamid knew far better than any
-one else that Midhat was innocent, and that Abdul Aziz
-had committed suicide, as was fully proved by the
-Medical report; if Abdul Hamid had had genuine
-proof on which to accuse Midhat before the eyes of
-Europe and the law, nothing could have prevented the
-death penalty from being executed, since he had sworn to
-put an end to Midhat Pasha. Although the Sultan was
-thus foiled in his attempt to put away Midhat by form of
-law, he did not relinquish his intention, but sought other
-clandestine means to attain it. How this was accomplished,
-will be proved by documents in the following pages.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">234</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER XII<br /><br />
-
-<small>EXILE OF MIDHAT PASHA</small></h2>
-
-<p><span class="smcap">The</span> Sultan, yielding to the humane intervention of
-England and Europe, named the town of Taïf, in Arabia,
-as the place of exile for Midhat Pasha. Taïf is a town
-situated to the south of Mecca, and is renowned for its
-verdure and for its surrounding fortress. Midhat Pasha,
-Damad Mahmoud Djelaleddin and Nouri Pashas, with
-the other prisoners, were taken by a special steamer and
-landed at Djeddah, and reached Taïf by way of Mecca.
-The Sheik‐ul‐Islam, Haïroullah Effendi, who had been on
-a pilgrimage to Mecca when he was accused of being an
-accomplice in the alleged murder of Abdul Aziz, had been
-imprisoned at Taïf, where Midhat found him on his arrival.</p>
-
-<p>After the banishment of Midhat, his family were
-detained in exile in Smyrna, and his son and daughter
-sought refuge from any possible contingency at the British
-Consulate, where they remained for three months, returning
-to their mother when the storm of these events had
-passed. Two years after his exile, Midhat sent his family
-the most alarming information in his letters, of which we
-give a translation. These letters were carried to Smyrna
-by men who were the devoted friends of the family, and
-who made the journey for that express purpose.</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Translation of an Autograph Letter from Midhat Pasha (from the
-Prison of Taïf) to his Family.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">My Dear Family</span>,&mdash;Nearly a month ago I sent you
-a letter through Saïd Bey&mdash;the last that I was able to
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">235</a></span>write before this&mdash;in which I gave you the list of the
-numbered letters which I had previously sent you. A
-week after, I became ill with an abscess on the right
-shoulder‐blade. Later on, this was diagnosed as being
-anthrax. It caused me very great suffering. The only
-doctor here is quite a young man, without any experience.
-My companions in exile,<a name="FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_26" class="fnanchor">26</a> seeing my condition, became
-very uneasy, and, without consulting me, took upon
-themselves to address a letter to the Governor of Mecca,
-asking that a doctor might be sent here. But they
-did not receive any reply from this personage, who, however,
-had just received through an aide‐de‐camp sent
-from Constantinople the firman bestowing on him the
-rank of marshal, and also strict secret orders that we must
-perish, either by starvation or by some other means.</p>
-
-<p>“To this end the Vali chose Major Bekir Effendi,
-who was charged with our surveillance and with the
-execution of this mission. As soon as he arrived, Bekir
-dismissed our servants and cooks and reduced our
-rations. I was in bed, suffering from the pain of this
-abscess, when Bekir came and told me the orders he had
-received, which he did in a severe voice, with a rough tone
-and without the least touch of feeling. He told us that we
-must be contented with a little soup and with vegetables,
-which would be served to us in one of those bowls used by
-the soldiers, and that we were strictly forbidden to procure
-other food than that which was provided for us. At the
-same time he forbade us to have our linen washed, a task
-which each one of us must perform for himself. Besides
-this, he took away the inkstand, pen and paper that was at
-our disposition, and everything necessary for correspondence.
-Luckily, I had burned your letters, although they
-contained nothing compromising, but complications might
-have arisen from them if they had fallen into their hands.</p>
-
-<p>“This part of his mission accomplished, Major Bekir had
-the wife and child of Haïroullah Effendi, who were occupying
-a separate house, sent off to Mecca that very night.
-Our servants and cooks followed very soon afterwards.</p>
-
-<p>“The treatment to which we are submitted is one means of
-many to get rid of us. For my companions have always been
-accustomed to luxury and ease, and even though hunger
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">236</a></span>may oblige them to eat the poor food given to the soldiers,
-their health cannot endure such a regimen, and they will
-certainly end by succumbing, but only after how much
-suffering and misery! I cannot give you an idea of the
-melancholy into which they are plunged. They are
-constantly praying Heaven for their deliverance. As to
-me, what I find the most painful, is being deprived of my
-servant, whom they removed by force, and whose attentions
-were more than ever necessary to me at a moment when
-my state of health has got so much worse.</p>
-
-<p>“The refusal of the Governor‐General of Mecca to send
-a doctor, and the speech and most unjustifiable conduct of
-Bekir, contributed not a little to the aggravation of my
-condition. I had no other consolation than the hope of
-quitting this life and of at last succumbing to the sufferings
-that I endured. But it cannot be helped; the supreme
-hour has not yet come, and I must still suffer. I had lost
-all hope, although Heaven in its mercy often reserves
-consolations for the unhappy, and relief for their sorrows.</p>
-
-<p>“I was thus in despair of ever getting well, when,
-thanks to the care of my companions, who applied a
-poultice, the abscess burst and continued suppurating for a
-fortnight. Since then the pain has diminished and the
-wound is beginning to heal. At the moment when
-Haïroullah Effendi’s wife and child, and our servants
-also, were embarking at Djeddah for Constantinople, a
-telegraphic order caused them to return to Taïf in company
-with Major Bekir. Thus, when on the point of becoming
-free, these unhappy beings were once more cast into prison.</p>
-
-<p>“This is a brief statement of our situation, and if no
-change takes place in the conditions of our existence, it
-will be very difficult for me to send letters as hitherto.
-The linen, food and money that you wish to send me
-will never reach me. Perhaps you could find some one
-who might be able to send me my false teeth. Give up
-any idea of sending me money, for we are now forbidden
-to buy any really nourishing food, such as meat, vegetables,
-rice, etc., and as to coffee, coal, and soap, I have plenty
-of money to buy those. I embrace you all affectionately.</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>8th Djemazi‐ul‐Ahir, 1301</i>” (1883).<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>
-(<i>Year of the Hegira.</i>)</small>
-</p>
-
-<p>“<i>P.S.</i>&mdash;Every morning they bring a bowl of soup for
-eight people, a dish of radish leaves or something of that
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">237</a></span>nature; in the evening we all assemble round these bowls
-and those who are very hungry are obliged to eat from
-them; the others content themselves with a piece of bread
-kept back from the day before. Those who have money
-buy soap and coal, and heat water for washing their linen.
-Those who are without the necessary means use water
-mixed with cinders. As to me, who have no teeth, I
-live on bread‐soup. The abscess is nearly cured, but my
-weakness is very great. As I have already told you, all
-these means are taken with the sole aim of destroying
-us. Time will show who will be the first to give me the
-<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">coup de grâce</i>.”</p></div>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>Another Autograph Letter from Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">My dear Wife, my beloved Daughters, my
-dear Son Ali Haidar</span>,&mdash;This letter is perhaps the last
-that I shall ever write you; for, as I told you in my
-two preceding letters, it is now proved that in modifying
-our regimen and in depriving us of all means of correspondence,
-they have no other aim than that of getting
-rid of us. Besides which they have tried to poison us.</p>
-
-<p>“Ten days ago, my servant Arif, whom I had ordered
-to buy some milk through one of the officers, discovered
-when he was boiling it that it was poisoned. Four days
-after this, Arif, having bought some meat, prepared it
-in the evening and placed it in his room. In the morning
-we perceived that the metal of the saucepan bore traces
-of poison. Several days afterwards they poisoned the
-water in the jug from which we drink. All these attempts
-have been foiled by the attention and watchfulness of
-the servant. Seeing this want of success, they will try
-other means. We are surrounded by very dangerous
-people; especially Major Tcherkesse Bekir, one of the
-college companions of the famous Tcherkesse Hassan,<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id="FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class="fnanchor">27</a>
-who was sent two years ago from Constantinople to keep
-watch over us. This Tcherkesse Bekir has, as accomplices,
-three non‐commissioned officers, who lodge with us. Every
-day the most sinister orders are transmitted to the Vali,
-Osman Pasha (Governor of Mecca), who in return for his
-services has received a Marshal’s bâton. Yesterday there
-arrived Colonel Tcherkesse Mehemet Lutfi, always with
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">238</a></span>the same orders. We are face to face with very great
-danger and are threatened with the blackest designs; I
-believe that there is little hope that we shall escape.
-Perhaps even before receiving this letter you will learn
-the news of my death. In this case it is useless to suffer
-great affliction. May the merciful God pardon us our
-sins! And if we are destined to succumb, there can
-be no greater happiness than to be martyrs in a holy
-cause.</p>
-
-<p>“My supreme desire is that you should live in peace,
-united around the family hearth. May the Almighty
-God have you in His Holy keeping!</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>10 Redjeb 1301, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>
-(<i>24th September 1883</i>).</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p>Madame Midhat had these facts brought to the knowledge
-of Lord Dufferin, at Constantinople. At the same
-time the Duke of Sutherland, who was going to Constantinople,
-passed through Smyrna and went to see
-Midhat’s family, assuring them that he would do all in
-his power to persuade the Sultan to give Midhat Pasha
-his liberty. Lord Dufferin made representations to the
-Ottoman Government, and charged the Dragoman belonging
-to the British Consulate at Djeddah to procure news
-of Midhat’s health from the Grand Shereef of Mecca.
-The Grand Shereef, Abdul Mutalib Pasha, assured the
-Dragoman that Midhat was perfectly well.<a name="FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_28" class="fnanchor">28</a> But the
-Sultan, terrified at the relations between the Grand Shereef
-Abdul Mutalib and the English Dragoman, accused the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_239" id="Page_239">239</a></span>
-former of holding secret relations with England, with a
-view to saving Midhat and combining with him against
-his person; he therefore disgraced him, throwing him into
-the fortress of Taïf. It was on this account that Midhat,
-without knowing the real reason, wrote the following letter
-to his family on the arrest of the Grand Shereef:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="center f09">Another Letter from Midhat Pasha to his Family.</p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">My Dear Family</span>,&mdash;Two days ago a very strange
-event occurred. During the night of 30th August, at
-midnight, the house of the Emir of Mecca, Shereef
-Abdul Mutalib (who was then in residence at Taïf), was
-suddenly surrounded by four battalions of Infantry and
-four guns. At daybreak he was torn from his bed and
-conducted to the fortress where we are imprisoned. He
-has been replaced in his office by the Shereef Abdullah
-Pasha. It is believed that Abdul Mutalib will be sent
-to Constantinople or elsewhere. He is accused of having
-kept up a correspondence with the English. The fact
-that this personage, who, in his anxiety to please in a
-high quarter, caused us so much suffering, is now thrown
-into a wretched hole of a prison, is a very great example.
-However, we can only pity his fate, when we think of
-his great age&mdash;he is a hundred&mdash;and that he is a descendant
-of the Prophet.</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“(Signed) <span class="smcap">Midhat</span>.</p>
-
-<p><small>“<i>2nd September 1299, O.S.</i>”<br />
-<span class="h">xxx</span>
-(<i>14th September 1882.</i>)</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p>Whilst the Sultan was assuring England of his good
-intentions, he was at the same time maturing his tyrannical
-plan of execution. Damad Nouri Pasha had already
-died&mdash;mad; but it was extremely difficult to put a Sheik‐ul‐Islam
-to death on a false accusation, and above all
-before the “Softa” (Theological Students and Ulemas, of
-whom he is the Supreme Head); for this reason, Haïroullah
-Effendi was placed on one side. The Vali of Hedjaz&mdash;Marshal
-Osman Nouri Pasha&mdash;received an order by special<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_240" id="Page_240">240</a></span>
-envoys to see to the execution of the murder. On the
-26th of April, 1883, they entered Midhat’s room during
-the night, and by means of a cord they strangled him
-in his bed without the least resistance. Damad Mahmoud
-Djelaleddin Pasha attempted to defend himself, but was
-overcome by brute force. An eye‐witness of the crime,
-Haïroullah Effendi, sent a letter of condolence to the
-family of Midhat Pasha, of which we publish a translation.</p>
-
-<p class="center f09"><i>To the Honourable Family of Midhat Pasha.</i></p>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p>“I humbly present my most respectful homage to
-Madame and Mesdemoiselles Midhat Pasha, and also to
-his son Ali Haydar Bey, with the expression of my profound
-regret and sympathy on the occasion of the death
-of our beloved master, Midhat Pasha. May the Almighty
-grant them as great a measure of happiness as there are
-grains of dust in the earth that covers his martyred
-remains.</p>
-
-<p>“You will have heard of his tragic death and of the
-circumstances under which it occurred. His Highness
-did not succumb, as has been announced in the newspapers,
-to the illness from which he was suffering. It is
-true that he had anthrax, but it was not bubonic. The
-truth is that in the same night and at the same moment
-both Midhat Pasha and Damad Mahmoud Pasha were
-strangled. May the Divine clemency and blessing be
-upon them.</p>
-
-<p>“There are many things that I ought to tell you,
-but I dare not write more fully, as I am in dread of our
-persecutors. Kindly let me hear that you have received
-this letter, and do not divulge the name of him who sent
-it. If you have anything that you wish to ask me you
-can write to me.</p>
-
-<p>“Half of the Pasha’s possessions have been stolen by
-the employés, the rest has been sent to Constantinople.</p>
-
-<p>“The servant, who so faithfully served our lamented
-Midhat Pasha, is well worthy of being helped. The
-Pasha, shortly before his death, left him £T100. He
-gave me a note signed to this effect, which I enclose
-to you, begging that you will send the poor man the
-money.</p>
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">241</a></span>
-<p>“I beg you, Madame and Mesdemoiselles, to accept
-the expression of my respectful affection.</p>
-
-<p class="right padr2">
-“<span class="smcap">Hassan Haïroullah.</span><br />
-(<i>ex‐Sheik‐ul‐Islam.</i>)</p>
-
-<p><small>“<span class="smcap">Taïf</span>, <i>15th Zilkade, 1301</i>” (1883).</small>
-</p></div>
-
-<p>Wishing to render a last service to his country, the
-Sheik‐ul‐Islam, Haïroullah Effendi, also sent to the Reform
-Party a record of the details of this assassination, which is
-contained in the following chapter.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">242</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>CHAPTER XIII<br /><br /></h2>
-
-<p class="indent f09"><small>DETAILS OF THE ASSASSINATION OF MIDHAT PASHA,
-ACCORDING TO INFORMATION DERIVED FROM HAÏROULLAH
-EFFENDI.</small></p>
-
-<p>In the course of the third year of his exile at Taïf, Midhat
-Pasha had a large tumour on his right shoulder. The
-doctor, who was permitted to attend him, was a certain
-Nashid Effendi, who delayed a fortnight before diagnosing
-it as anthrax, and who, being ignorant of all modern
-surgical knowledge, did not even perform the necessary
-operation, alleging the age of the Pasha as a cause for
-this omission.</p>
-
-<p>This infamous and unworthy conduct on the part of
-the doctor was, at first, explained in two ways: as he
-had only just left the School of Medicine, perhaps he had
-not sufficient experience, or perhaps he was acting under
-superior orders of those who were desirous of the death of
-the invalid. But what is certain is that Damad Mahmoud
-Pasha, companion in exile of Midhat, having no confidence
-either in the capacity or honesty of Nashid, and fearing
-lest he had some criminal design, sent a telegram to the
-Governor‐General of Hedjaz, residing at Mecca&mdash;Osman
-Nouri Pasha, who is now Marshal and Aide‐de‐camp to
-Abdul Hamid&mdash;in which he implored him to send another
-doctor, accusing Nashid of incapacity. But Osman Nouri
-had not even the politeness to reply to him. However,
-fortunately the anthrax burst of itself, and it was always
-this same Nashid, accompanied by an officer, Captain<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_243" id="Page_243">243</a></span>
-Ibrahim Aga, who dressed the wound. The state of
-health of the invalid, which grew worse from day to
-day, was caused probably by the treatment to which
-he was submitted. It must be said that it is almost by
-a miracle that the wound healed eventually, thanks to
-a different but altogether rudimentary treatment, which
-was tried.</p>
-
-<p>The doctor made a report to the Governor‐General
-after each visit, and that official never failed to transmit
-it regularly by telegraph to Yildiz Kiosk.</p>
-
-<p>One day Nashid, after dressing the wound with
-Ibrahim, suddenly asked Midhat Pasha, to the general
-consternation, if it were really true that in Europe criminals
-were now only executed by means of chloroform. This
-question, simple enough in itself, gave more than one
-person cause for reflection.</p>
-
-<p>Major Bekir<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id="FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" class="fnanchor">29</a> of the Third Battalion, 10th Regiment,
-who was specially charged with the surveillance of the
-prisoners, had gone away some days previously to Mecca
-and Medina. It was with very great surprise, therefore,
-that we saw him enter Midhat Pasha’s room with the
-doctor and Ibrahim. When asked the reason of his
-sudden return, Bekir replied simply, with extraordinary
-cunning, that it was only to arrange certain affairs of
-the garrison, in the first place, and secondly, to collect the
-taxes in the villages situated on the side of Tarié. He
-added that he was getting ready for this journey on the
-receipt of a special order from the <em>Muchir</em> (Marshal).</p>
-
-<p>This was a bare‐faced lie, and we shall see further
-on what was in reality the mission with which he was
-charged.</p>
-
-<p>The sixth day after the arrival of Major Bekir was a
-Friday, and, as usual, the servants belonging to the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">244</a></span>
-prisoners, accompanied by a guard, went to the mosque
-in the town for the Friday prayer. Arif Aga, servant to
-Midhat Pasha, remained by his suffering master.</p>
-
-<p>On their return, Major Bekir stopped them all before
-the <em>caracol</em> or guard‐room, and not seeing Arif Aga
-amongst them, had him at once sent for.</p>
-
-<p>Arif refused to obey this order, alleging that he could
-not leave his invalid alone. When the Pashas perceived
-that Bekir insisted, they told the orderly to fetch him, in
-order that they might learn the reason of this inexplicable
-affair. Bekir, on receiving this communication, jumped
-up, and going to Midhat Pasha’s room in the <em>kalé</em> (fortress),
-declared in a haughty, insulting manner that the servants
-would be dismissed from their service, that in future they
-would have to be contented to eat from <em>caravanas</em>, and
-that they would no longer be allowed to purchase eggs,
-cheese, nor olives, only tobacco; and last of all, that they
-would now be forbidden to present any further requests
-to the Sultan.</p>
-
-<p>Such was the arrogant language employed by Bekir.
-Later on, changing his tone, he added with less impertinence
-that he was charged with a special mission,
-and that he had received an order to send Haïroullah
-Effendi’s wife (who was living in the town with her baby)
-first of all to Mecca, and thence to Constantinople. This
-was most alarming news to many, for it all pointed to
-secret plots. However, there was no other course open
-than to await the end with resignation.</p>
-
-<p>Damad Mahmoud Pasha, who was of a very hot‐blooded
-disposition, and who easily got angry, lost
-patience, and replied to the explanations of Bekir by
-demanding that at least the dismissed attendants might
-be allowed to return to them in order to settle their
-accounts. Bekir, now become almost amiable, replied
-that this would be contrary to the orders he had received,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">245</a></span>
-but in order to do them a service, he would take the
-responsibility upon himself and allow the servants to come,
-accompanied by a guard.</p>
-
-<p>The servants, after their accounts had been settled,
-were lodged in a room near the principal door of the
-barracks. The cooking utensils, pens, paper, and ink‐stands,
-which until then had been placed at the disposition
-of the Pashas, were now taken from them. Bekir,
-in order to make the preparations for his travels, spent
-the night at the barracks.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat Pasha had more than once filled the office of
-Grand Vizier, and had rendered eminent services to his
-country. The manner in which they treated him shocked
-me, for even under these circumstances, taking into consideration
-his age and the weak state of his health, they
-might have shown him some consideration.</p>
-
-<p>A hospital attendant, a soldier, who was completely
-ignorant of the habits of the Pasha, was now appointed
-as his servant. Nevertheless, Midhat Pasha, we must
-allow, whilst we render homage to his energy, submitted
-to all these humiliations with the greatest calm, and even
-with indifference.</p>
-
-<p>On the 8th of April, a Sunday, Bekir visited Midhat,
-undoubtedly with the intention, after some conversation,
-of taking the latest news to the Pasha at Hedjaz, for
-that same day he was going to leave for Mecca, taking
-with him the wife of Haïroullah, his child, the servants,
-and the cooks.</p>
-
-<p>“Are you going now?” asked Midhat Pasha of Bekir.</p>
-
-<p>“Yes, in a few hours,” he replied; “if you have any
-communications to make me, will you kindly do so
-now?”</p>
-
-<p>“Very well! Listen to me attentively. His Majesty,
-Abdul Hamid, has recently raised the Vali to the rank
-of Marshal, and I congratulate the latter with all my heart.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">246</a></span>
-You know, however, all the services that I have rendered
-my country; no one can deny them. You are not ignorant
-of the distinguished posts I have successively occupied.
-Now, you see how I am treated; I see nothing before
-me except the most gloomy prospect, and it is through
-you that they will get rid of me. You will be the
-instruments, and each of you, most probably, will be
-promoted; the officer will become colonel, the colonel
-will be gazetted as a general, and so on; but remember
-that you may die after Abdul Hamid. If you die before,
-your titles will be inscribed on your tombs; but if the
-contrary occurs, then I am convinced it will be quite
-otherwise. Pause now, examine your conscience, calculate
-your own moral and material interests, and without
-looking so far ahead, whilst His Majesty is still alive,
-just think for a moment what has become of the Chief
-President of that arbitrary tribunal which condemned
-me in so cowardly a manner, without any tangible proof.
-It is quite true that Sourouri Effendi was appointed
-<em>Cadi Asker</em>; but was he not exiled soon afterwards,
-under the title of Governor of Manissa. As to Djevdet
-Pasha, the second President, he is, as everyone knows,
-deprived of his functions, and is now at home&mdash;a disgraced
-man. Think of these events, and you will form a correct
-idea of the situation. I see that some crime is overhanging
-me. Remember the verse of the Koran which says:
-‘Whosoever kills shall be punished with hell and eternal
-tortures.’... We are all deserving of chastisement at
-the hands of Divine Justice. And now that you know
-my opinion, will you communicate it faithfully to the
-Vali?”</p>
-
-<p>Bekir grew pale, but plucking up courage, replied: “I
-have been present at several battles; but, apart from war,
-I have never even cut off the head of a fowl.” The conversation
-coming to an end, Bekir went out of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">247</a></span>
-prisoner’s room, and at once started on his journey to
-Mecca, accompanied by the individuals we have already
-mentioned.</p>
-
-<p>On the seventh day after his departure&mdash;a Friday
-evening&mdash;we saw him return to Taïf. To the general
-surprise he reinstated the servants in the Pashas’ service.
-After a few days Haïroullah’s wife also returned from
-Djeddah with her baby and the cook. Haïroullah
-ordered his servant Ibrahim to look after his household
-in the town, and contented himself with the services of
-a common soldier.</p>
-
-<p>The day after his return Bekir once more made his
-appearance in the Pashas’ quarters, saying that a new
-Irade had just been telegraphed ordering a diminution
-of the prisoner’s rations and the dismissal of the cooks.
-He also presented the greetings from the Vali, who
-would, nevertheless, allow them to purchase from the
-bazaar all that they needed.</p>
-
-<p>Why this toleration? What did it mean, coming
-after the diminution of the rations and the dismissal
-of the cooks? Bekir replied to this maliciously, stating
-that such a duty was most unpleasing to him, but that
-as a soldier he was compelled to obey his superiors,
-although he regretted to be unable to act otherwise.</p>
-
-<p>At this time, Midhat Pasha was fortunately almost
-entirely cured of his illness, but they still continued to
-telegraph daily the state of his health to the Governor‐General.</p>
-
-<p>One day Midhat Pasha sent his attendant to the
-town to buy some milk from a milkman named Echreff.
-Immediately on learning this, one of the officers, told
-off to guard the prisoners, a certain Nouri, wished to
-accompany the soldier to the milkman’s house. On arriving
-at their destination, they asked for the milk. Echreff
-declared that he had only three <em>kilos</em> of milk, which had<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_248" id="Page_248">248</a></span>
-been ordered by the General, but that he would give
-them one <em>ock</em> at once if it were for the Pasha. Nouri
-accepted this offer, and ordered the soldier to take it to
-Daïra. This most unexpected and unusual amiability on
-the part of Nouri was noticed, and gave rise to suspicions.</p>
-
-<p>During the Pasha’s illness, it was Saïd Bey, another
-prisoner, who watched over the food prepared by
-Midhat’s servant, Arif Aga. Saïd Bey at once took care
-to examine the can that contained this milk, and noticed
-to his surprise that the colour of it was unnatural. He
-tasted a small spoonful and found that the milk had a
-bitter flavour that hurt his throat. Saïd mentioned this
-fact to several people who were present, and especially to
-the lieutenant, Mehemet Aga, and they all tasted it&mdash;some
-of them even had to keep to their beds for several
-days afterwards, having been so imprudent as to take a
-sufficient quantity to upset their system.</p>
-
-<p>When this was related to Midhat Pasha, he at once
-sent for Mehemet Aga, and with much self‐restraint spoke
-to him as follows: “I sent to‐day for some of the same
-milk as that ordered by the Binbashi (Major). It has
-been found to contain verdigris; this has been proved by
-all those who drank it; I believe that you also tasted it.”</p>
-
-<p>Mehemet acknowledged that the milk had been very
-much adulterated. Midhat, still preserving his <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">sang‐froid</i>,
-continued: “Since this is the case, why do you not go to
-the Binbashi (Major) and warn him to be careful not to
-drink it.”</p>
-
-<p>The officer went away hurriedly, and soon after returned,
-saying: “That the Binbashi was going to send
-for the milkman, that he intended to investigate the
-matter, and that if it were deserved, a severe punishment
-would be inflicted. That he meant to get to the bottom
-of the whole business.”</p>
-
-<p>But we learned later on that before Mehemet went to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_249" id="Page_249">249</a></span>
-inform the Binbashi, this latter was in the garden of the
-military hospital, surrounded by his confidants, whom
-he asked from time to time if all had gone off well!
-If the milk had been drunk, and if it had proved
-efficacious.</p>
-
-<p>At the same time we were told that several soldiers
-who had drunk the Binbashi’s milk had become ill.
-This, undoubtedly, was nothing but a rumour which had
-been purposely spread, and has never received confirmation
-from any trustworthy source.</p>
-
-<p>A sample of this milk was sent to the Binbashi to be
-analysed by the doctors. The only reply he made was:
-“That they had not got the necessary apparatus for
-analysis!” This is absolutely incredible.</p>
-
-<p>In order to save appearances, Bekir sent for Echreff,
-the milkman, and remonstrated with him. But Echreff,
-on his side, protested most vehemently. Besides which
-all his cans were in good condition. He insisted that the
-milk must have been contaminated by some medicament
-after it had left his dairy.</p>
-
-<p>Thus the incident was closed, for the Binbashi did not
-follow up the affair, which he wished to be forgotten.</p>
-
-<p>Another time a strange fact was again noticed. It
-was when Arif, Midhat’s servant, was still in his service.
-He always passed his nights in the Pasha’s room, having
-first of all locked up his own, in which he frequently kept
-the food he had prepared for the following day.</p>
-
-<p>Arif perceived one morning that the lids of his
-saucepans had been disturbed, and that their contents
-presented an unusual appearance. He immediately told
-Midhat of his extraordinary discovery, and the Pasha
-sent at once for Damad Mahmoud and the other
-prisoners, begging them to examine the saucepans.
-After a summary examination they ascertained that
-some foreign matter had been introduced. The perpe<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_250" id="Page_250">250</a></span>trator
-of this odious attempt remained as much unknown
-as he who had put the verdigris in the milk. The contents
-of all the saucepans were given to the dogs and cats, but
-as these animals were none the worse, we thought that
-this foreign matter could not have been a poison. However,
-after the assassination of Midhat Pasha we learned
-that the sub‐lieutenants Mehemet and Nouri, getting in
-one night by the window, had managed to poison all
-those dishes of which Midhat Pasha would have partaken
-the following day. These two gentlemen made a complete
-confession of this crime some time afterwards.</p>
-
-<p>During this time there was an honest soldier, Mehemet
-Yosgad, whose duty it was to prepare the coffee. We
-now know that it was suggested to him more than once
-that he should give poison to the prisoners, mixing it with
-their coffee. However, as this honourable man firmly
-refused to commit this crime, others had to be found who
-would undertake it.</p>
-
-<p>Mahmoud Pasha, who was very fond of coffee, began
-to give up drinking it, and no longer smoked his <em>narghilé</em>,
-but in order to show his confidence in honest Mehemet,
-he never refused coffee that had been prepared by him.</p>
-
-<p>Another time it was noticed that the water which
-was kept in a <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">baradé</i> had a most offensive smell. The
-jar was broken, and very great precautions were taken
-thenceforth.</p>
-
-<p>Major Bekir was a thoroughly bad man, and extremely
-cunning. He took as many precautions about the crime
-he was about to commit as he did about his accomplices.
-So far all attempts at poisoning had failed; other means
-must be employed!</p>
-
-<p>On the 9th of Redjeb, 1301 (23rd April 1883, O.S.),
-a Sunday, a detachment of cavalry, with two guns, arrived
-at Taïf, under the command of a Circassian colonel
-belonging to the 53rd regiment of the 7th Army Corps.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_251" id="Page_251">251</a></span>
-Mehemet Lutfi at once chose out about forty of the
-strongest soldiers and increased the prisoners’ guard.</p>
-
-<p>Before the arrival of Mehemet Lutfi, Bekir had several
-times called Hadji Chukri Aga, Mahmoud Pasha’s servant,
-into his own private room very late at night, when every
-one was asleep, and kept him there in trivial conversation;
-but he had never dared to confide the secret to him, nor
-to ask his help, for Chukri was not the kind of man to
-become his accomplice, or to commit a crime against his
-benefactor.</p>
-
-<p>As has been stated above, the colonel reorganised
-the prisoners’ guards after his own manner. The
-same day he sent for Arif Aga in order that he
-might have the incident of the milk explained to him,
-but in reality he proposed to Arif that he should poison
-his master.</p>
-
-<p>“The poison is ready,” he said, “and if you succeed
-in making Midhat drink it, you will receive very great
-rewards from His Majesty the Sultan. Another man has
-been commissioned to kill Damad Mahmoud, but if you
-are willing to undertake that as well, your recompense
-shall be doubled. If ever you divulge the secret you
-will be killed.”</p>
-
-<p>The promised reward amounted to £T1000 for the
-death of Midhat, and £T600 for that of Mahmoud.</p>
-
-<p>Arif was a devoted and faithful servant, besides being
-a good Mussulman. He not only refused the rewards,
-but, disregarding all intimidations, protested strongly
-against the cowardly and unworthy schemes that they
-had formed against his master. He hastened also to
-relate to Midhat and to Mahmoud Pasha all that had
-been said to him.</p>
-
-<p>These two Pashas, deeply moved by this communication,
-held a long consultation together, but to no purpose.
-What could they do? For a long time now they had<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_252" id="Page_252">252</a></span>
-foreseen very clearly that their end was approaching, if
-not by one way, then by another.</p>
-
-<p>The colonel, who had not thought fit to pay them a
-visit, appeared very much preoccupied.</p>
-
-<p>On the second night after his arrival he had the
-prisoners’ quarters surrounded by numerous soldiers, and
-gave special orders to those who formed the inside
-guard. On Tuesday evening, he wished to end the
-whole affair, but circumstances obliged him to put off
-the execution until the following night. Ibrahim Aga,
-the captain, and three lieutenants sent for Arif Aga, and
-told him plainly that owing to a command received from
-the Palace of Yildiz Kiosk, they were obliged to put an
-end to Midhat, and that as Arif had refused to poison
-him, they hoped that at least he would have a little good
-sense and open the door of the Pasha’s room about midnight;
-and that if he refused this little service they would
-know what steps to take.</p>
-
-<p>Poor Arif Aga, maddened by hearing of the odious
-crime which was about to be committed against his
-beloved master, sprang up in rage and cried frantically
-to these wretches: “Oh no! I will never do what you
-suggest&mdash;I will never open the door! I will not be
-your accomplice! I am afraid of my conscience and of
-Allah!”</p>
-
-<p>They were beginning to ill‐treat him, but at that
-moment the prisoners happened to be going to their
-separate rooms. Midhat, who was on his way to his
-bedroom, was descending the stairs when he heard the
-voice of his faithful servant crying out over and over
-again: “Master, do not go down; return to your friends
-at once, and spend the night with them. These cowards
-are meaning to assassinate you!”</p>
-
-<p>Midhat Pasha went up the stairs again, re‐assembled
-the prisoners, and informed them of this sinister occur<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">253</a></span>rence.
-Just then one of the officers went to tell the
-colonel what had happened. He ordered that Arif should
-be arrested and the prisoners all separated. The faithful
-servant was dragged off to the barracks, where he was
-imprisoned, whilst an officer, Memiche, was sent by the
-colonel to separate the prisoners and to try and calm
-their fears.</p>
-
-<p>“The colonel,” said Memiche, “presents his compliments
-to you all, and begs that you will withdraw to
-your separate bedrooms, as the law requires.” To this
-command Midhat and Mahmoud replied that they would
-only be separated by force. They sent for Ibrahim, who
-arrived somewhat troubled by the turn of affairs. They
-also requested to speak with Bekir, in order to obtain
-some explanation of this matter. The major arrived, and
-entering the room, said&mdash;“That good‐for‐nothing Arif
-doesn’t know what he’s talking about. It looks as if he
-were doing all this in order to get sent away, unless
-he is quite out of his mind.” The Pashas could not
-succeed in hiding their anxiety, for everything foreboded
-the approaching crime.</p>
-
-<p>“At the present moment,” continued Bekir, “no such
-order exists. But we are soldiers, and therefore owe unquestioning
-obedience to our superiors. Be quite at ease!
-Do you think that anyone would be afraid of you whilst
-you are in our safe keeping?”</p>
-
-<p>He then began to swear by all that he held most sacred
-in the world that there was no cause for them to fear.
-Meanwhile Arif Aga was being tortured for having
-divulged the secret.</p>
-
-<p>Midhat passed the whole of that night with Ali Bey,
-another prisoner.</p>
-
-<p>Colonel Mehemet Lutfi and Major Bekir remained
-in the room overlooking the principal entrance to the
-barracks, whence they directed the operations. The<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_254" id="Page_254">254</a></span>
-soldiers were given the same orders as on the preceding
-night, and cartridges were distributed amongst them.</p>
-
-<p>A captain and three lieutenants were placed in the
-prisoners’ quarters to superintend operations, and two
-soldiers, bare‐footed for the occasion, and with bayonets
-fixed, were stationed at the door of each prisoner’s room.</p>
-
-<p>About six o’clock,<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id="FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class="fnanchor">30</a> Hadji Chukri Aga, Mahmoud’s
-servant was awakened and transferred to the barracks,
-where he was imprisoned.</p>
-
-<p>Colonel Mehemet Lutfi remained in the barracks,
-whilst Major Bekir directed the assassination from the
-officers’ room.<a name="FNanchor_31_31" id="FNanchor_31_31"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_31" class="fnanchor">31</a></p>
-
-<p>We have stated above that Ali Bey was sharing
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">255</a></span>Midhat’s room. At about half‐past six (1.30 <span class="smcap">A.M.</span>) the
-door was forced open, and Ali Bey was dragged from
-the room. Then they strangled this old man, who was
-incapable of offering any resistance.</p>
-
-<p>On bursting in the door of Mahmoud’s room, they
-threw round his neck a soaped cord, which had been
-specially prepared, for they were aware that he possessed
-very considerable muscular strength. Mahmoud made a
-most desperate resistance, giving vent to piercing cries.
-They tried every means to hasten his death, with such
-ferocity that even the animals in the neighbourhood
-trembled at the sound of his heartrending cries for help.
-But soon the screams of anguish died away.</p>
-
-<p>A few moments after, two corpses, wrapped in sheets,
-were transported to a room in the hospital. The perpetrators
-waited until the day broke before digging their
-graves in the cemetery, set apart for soldiers, which lies
-outside the fortifications. There these two martyrs repose
-in their eternal sleep.</p>
-
-<p>Even the religious ceremonies were not carried out with
-regard to the funeral&mdash;doubtless, in order that the secret
-might be better preserved. They knew not that Time is
-the Revealer of all things!</p>
-
-<p class="center2"><span class="gesperrt">* * * * *</span></p>
-
-<p>Midhat Pasha had recovered completely from his indisposition.
-One evening, a little while before his
-assassination, after a lengthy meditation, he had said to
-his friends: “I am thinking of death. The pain thereof
-only endures for five minutes. But I do not know what
-kind of death may be the least painful. Perhaps poison,
-or a bullet, or death at the end of some illness. My body,
-sixty year old, is worn out. Why live beyond this age if it
-be only to suffer! I should have been happy if my illness
-had carried me off. But what can I do? The hour has
-not struck yet. Several innocent people are prisoners here<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">256</a></span>
-on my account, being obliged to mount guard over me; I
-should have liked to give them back their liberty.”</p>
-
-<p>Finishing these reflections, he once more returned to
-his sad and harrowing meditations.</p>
-
-<p class="center2"><span class="gesperrt">* * * * *</span></p>
-
-<p>Immediately after the horrible execution, that same
-night, the doors and locks were all repaired, and two days
-later the belongings of the Pashas were taken into a room
-in the barracks. During two consecutive days several
-subordinates kept going in and out of this room, removing
-small objects.</p>
-
-<p>Terror had reigned in the hearts of all the prisoners
-during the assassination. The following day the sentinels
-were removed, and when the prisoners went to make their
-morning prayer they embraced and took a last farewell of
-each other, bursting into tears and awaiting their turn
-with resignation. The reign of terror still continued, and
-every word and gesture gave rise to suspicion.</p>
-
-<p class="center2"><span class="gesperrt">* * * * *</span></p>
-
-<p>Thus ends the faithful translation of the document sent
-by Halroullah Effendi, ex‐Sheik‐ul‐Islam. We have
-preserved all its originality.</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_257" id="Page_257">257</a></span></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">258</a></span></p>
-
-<p class="center f12">APPENDICES</p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">259</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>APPENDIX A<br /><br />
-
-<small>THE NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE BERLIN NOTE
-AND THE CONFERENCE OF CONSTANTINOPLE</small></h2>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p><span class="smcap">The</span> effects of the Bulgarian troubles on British policy were clearly
-visible. England, that had hitherto been favourable and friendly
-to Turkey; that had counselled against the Consular Commission
-of August 1875; had adhered to the Andrassy note of December (1875)
-only at the express request of the Ottoman Government (on the
-13th June 1876); had pressed reforms upon Turkey as a means of
-forestalling the designs of the enemies of the Ottoman Empire,<a name="FNanchor_32_32" id="FNanchor_32_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_32" class="fnanchor">32</a>
-and had firmly refused to adhere to the Berlin Memorandum, now
-took up a slightly altered position. This nuance was clearly perceived
-in a despatch from Lord Derby to Sir H. Elliot of the
-25th May 1876, in which he said: “In the course of conversation
-with Musurus Pasha, I took the opportunity of suggesting to His
-Excellency that it would be undesirable that the Turkish Government
-should misunderstand the attitude of Her Majesty’s Government
-in regard to the proposals of the Berlin Conference. Her Majesty’s
-Government had declined to join in proposals which they thought
-ill‐advised, <em>but both the circumstances and the state of feeling in this
-country were very much changed since the Crimean War</em>, and the
-Porte would be unwise to be led, by recollections of that period, to
-count upon more than the moral support of Her Majesty’s Government
-in the event of no satisfactory solution of the present difficulties
-being found.”<a name="FNanchor_33_33" id="FNanchor_33_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_33" class="fnanchor">33</a> It will be seen later on that even this attitude of
-benevolent diplomatic neutrality was not entirely preserved by the
-British Government at the Conference of Constantinople or the
-negotiations that led up to it.</p>
-
-<p>“The three Northern and allied Powers” were evidently disconcerted
-by the turn matters were taking at Constantinople. It seemed
-impossible to present a comminatory note to a new Sultan and a new
-Government established by a revolution, the very purpose and aim of
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">260</a></span>
-which was to introduce practical reforms in the country, without a
-certain delay demanded by equity and even decency. They determined
-to make it as short as possible.</p>
-
-<p>In spite, however, of strenuous efforts to conceal the fact, differences
-had arisen among “the allied Courts,” or rather between the
-two principal parties interested. Russia was in favour of an occupation
-of the three disturbed provinces, with a view to the eventual
-establishment of autonomies on the model of Servia and Roumania.
-Austria was dead opposed to both propositions. There is no doubt
-that she had been working up to an occupation by her own troops
-of Bosnia and Herzegovina as the mandate of Europe&mdash;up to the
-time of the Bulgarian insurrection; but now that such an occupation
-would be accompanied by a Russian occupation of Bulgaria, she
-entirely changed her mind. If a joint occupation took place, the
-last state of those provinces would be worse than the first. At
-present she had the strategical advantage of position over Russia, but
-Russia in Bulgaria would have it over her. She was firmly opposed
-to joint occupation. Neither would autonomy suit her. The
-establishment of autonomous provinces, placed under the guarantee of
-the Great Powers, would make the absorption by herself of these
-coveted possessions impossible. Count Andrassy put his foot down
-against both these proposals.</p>
-
-<p>A very active interchange of ideas consequently took place during
-the whole of the month of June between the two Empires, and it was
-here that the full value of a third partner, the disinterested broker,
-was revealed. Russia evidently meant business, for Servia, which was,
-as Consul‐General White explained, absolutely in her hands, now
-(1st July 1876) formally declared war against Turkey, and invaded the
-Ottoman territory. Montenegro followed her example. In the
-latter case it was rather a superfluous or <em>ex post facto</em> formality.</p>
-
-<p>A knot had occurred worthy of the interposition of the gods,
-and on the 8th July a meeting was arranged at Reichstadt between
-the Emperor Francis Joseph and the Czar. Of course it is only in
-Homeric times that accounts of the interviews of Olympic gods were
-vouchsafed to men, and simple mortals have to content themselves
-nowadays with being told the results of these interviews. The
-result of this particular interview was “very satisfactory.” According
-to Sir A. Buchanan, “the Emperor and Count Andrassy returned
-last night (10th July 1876) <em>greatly satisfied</em> with the interview of
-Reichstadt.” “The Emperors parted on the best terms; they agreed
-to maintain the present principle of non‐intervention, reserving for
-the future the expediency of coming to an understanding with the
-Great Powers, according to circumstances which may arise.”<a name="FNanchor_34_34" id="FNanchor_34_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_34" class="fnanchor">34</a> So,
-according to this authority, the Emperor of Austria returned to
-Vienna “greatly satisfied” with doing nothing. It was scarcely worth
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">261</a></span>while going all the way to Reichstadt for that. It was, however,
-generally supposed in well‐informed chancelleries in Europe at the
-time, and subsequent events greatly corroborated the surmise, that
-the Emperor had something else to be greatly satisfied about than
-what was vouchsafed to Sir A. Buchanan.</p>
-
-<p>It was said that two specific points had been formally agreed upon
-between the rulers of these two military Empires, in presence of the
-threatening aspect that affairs were assuming. (1) That, should
-affairs in the East eventuate in war between Turkey and Russia,
-Russia would, under no circumstances, seek any territorial acquisition
-<em>in Europe</em>. (2) That Bosnia and Herzegovina should be considered
-within the exclusive sphere of Austria’s influence, and that Russia
-would not actively oppose any arrangement with respect to them
-that Europe might propose. All the rest would be left to their
-respective chancellors, each would retain his liberty of action and
-pursue the policy he deemed the best, certain that nothing that
-could happen in the way of differences of opinion between them
-could bring about a rupture between the two Empires. The middle
-term of an agreement had evidently been found. “British interests”
-would pay the bill, and the desertion of Bucharest would be avenged.</p>
-
-<p>By a curious coincidence, on the same day (8th July) that this
-historical interview took place, there appeared in the <cite>Daily News</cite>
-the famous “atrocity article” that set all England ablaze and started
-the greatest orator of the day on his crusade against the “unspeakable
-Turk.”</p>
-
-<p>The indirect effect on English policy of this crusade and the
-atrocity meetings all over England that followed it, was seen in the
-nuance already noticed, between the terms of the despatch of the
-25th May and that of the 25th September, which was the prelude to
-the Conference where it was still further accentuated.</p>
-
-<p>July was destined to bring an aggravation of trouble on the
-Turkish Empire and anxiety on Turkish Ministers. Austria chose
-this moment (1st July) to shut to Turkey the port of Klek, through
-which the Turkish army in Herzegovina received its chief supplies.
-It is not necessary to enter here into the question of international
-right involved in this matter. This turned on the interpretation of
-ancient treaties with the Venetian Republic, and on the boundaries
-of the “enclaves” in Dalmatia, and these questions had, by mutual
-consent, been left dormant for long years between the Austrian and
-Ottoman Governments. Suffice it to say that a <em>modus vivendi</em> had
-been arrived at between the two Governments in 1853 (“in the hope
-that an amicable arrangement will intervene relative to the question
-of the enclaves of Klek and Suttorina”), and had subsisted ever
-since. For Austria, after leaving the question of right in abeyance
-for twenty‐three years, to choose that particular moment when the
-maximum of inconvenience would be thereby caused to the Ottoman
-Government, was a high‐handed proceeding of the most unfriendly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_262" id="Page_262">262</a></span>
-nature, and could only be justified on the principle of <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">la force prime
-le droit</i>. At any rate, it finally exploded the pretext of “her deep
-and earnest anxiety” for the pacification of these provinces which she
-was continually putting forward as the motives of her diplomatic
-actions, as well as all pretence of friendly dispositions towards the
-Porte. The energy displayed by the new Government at Constantinople
-in sending reinforcements to the scene of action, and the success
-attending these efforts, were perhaps the real motive of this unqualified
-act, for in consequence of that energy, things were not going well
-with the insurrection, and new factors would have to be imported to
-keep it going.</p>
-
-<p>Accordingly, at the same time the port of supply for the Turkish
-troops was closed, Montenegro and Servia declared war on the Porte
-(1st July 1876). (As far as the first‐named principality was concerned
-this formality was rather superfluous <em>ex post facto</em> formality.) Ever
-since the “intimate relations which had existed for two years back”
-between the Courts of Vienna and Cettinje, Montenegro had never
-ceased to carry on war against the Ottoman troops. Indeed her
-mountaineers, together with the Grenzers and Dalmatians, had been
-the mainstay of the “rebellion.” Only as, nominally, peaceful
-relations had never been interrupted, the Turkish Commanders were
-debarred from following the rebels on Montenegrin soil, and Russia
-had drawn a taboo round Montenegro, and forbidden, under penalty
-of war, the invasion of that land, and Mr Jomine, the Russian diplomatic
-agent at Cettinje, was, with his Austrian colleague, the confidential
-adviser of the prince.</p>
-
-<p>As far back as January 1876, Sir H. Elliot had informed Lord
-Derby of “the system employed by the Montenegrins in aid
-of the Herzegovinian insurgents. All the men (in Montenegro),
-capable of bearing arms, are considered to be soldiers, and are
-made into battalions of 600 men. The commanders and majors
-of these battalions, who are called commanders and pod‐commanders,
-receive pay; the remaining officers and men are unpaid.
-When an expedition is contemplated, each man takes with him
-potatoes and bread, if he has any, for five days, and a reserve of
-provisions from each village is carried by women or baggage horses.
-The Austrian Committees, having provided surgeons and medicines,
-hospitals and ambulances have been organised in some villages on
-the frontier. The prince furnishes all those who join the insurgents
-<cite>without authorisation, but he sends one‐fifth of his effective forces into
-the Herzegovina. Not to overtire these poor people, His Highness
-takes care to change them at the end of each expedition, or when
-their provisions are exhausted. Reforms alone, it is stated, will
-never put an end to the insurrection, and force is of no avail so
-long as the insurgents and their Montenegrin friends have only to
-cross the frontier to be in safety.</cite>”<a name="FNanchor_35_35" id="FNanchor_35_35"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_35" class="fnanchor">35</a></p>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_263" id="Page_263">263</a></span></p>
-<p>As for Servia, Consul‐General White had for months past warned
-his Government of what was preparing, and of the wholesale influx of
-Russians into the Servian army, nor had Prince Milan made any
-disguise of the fact of the likelihood of his being drawn into the
-<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">mêlée</i>, but a certain almost comic jealousy existed between the
-rulers of these two little principalities, lest the one should steal a
-march on the other, and acquire a better right to the title of the
-“liberator of the Slav race.”</p>
-
-<p>They consequently agreed to declare war on Turkey together.
-As Servia, confident in her new levies, was now determined to act,
-Montenegro could not afford to be behindhand, however much it
-might have suited her to continue the particular mode of safe
-warfare that she had, for twelve months, been indulging in.</p>
-
-<p>In spite of the new levies, military matters did not progress to
-Prince Milan’s satisfaction. The fact was that a new spirit had been
-infused into Ottoman Councils by the new ministers, and large
-reinforcements of regular troops under competent generals had been
-hurried to the Servian frontiers and despatched into Bosnia. The
-consequence was that victory did not attend the Servian arms, and,
-after the loss of an important position near Deligrad on the 24th
-August 1876, barely two months after the pompous declaration of
-war, Prince Milan “with the approval of his ally, the Prince of
-Montenegro,” requested the good offices of the Powers for a
-suspension of hostilities. All Europe eagerly seconded this request,
-and although a formal armistice was never concluded, a <em>de facto</em>
-suspension of hostilities took place. It is unnecessary to detail the
-negotiations that followed.</p>
-
-<p>The Porte very naturally desired that an agreement on the basis
-of peace should precede or accompany an armistice, otherwise it
-would lose all the advantages of its present military position. Servia
-wanted an armistice without any basis of peace. When at last, in
-consequence of the insistence of Europe, the Porte agreed to this, a
-dispute arose about the duration of the armistice. The Porte proposed
-six months to give ample time to negotiate a permanent
-settlement, and England adhered to this view of the matter. Servia
-would have none of it; one month or nothing. She was moving on
-safe ground, for she knew well that Europe had taken the negotiations
-out of her hand and would never allow a renewed attack upon her.
-Russia strongly insisted on the shorter term, and when, in order to
-solve the difficulty, England appealed to the honest broker at Berlin,
-he proposed as a compromise an armistice of six weeks.</p>
-
-<p>These <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">pourparlers</i> occupied about a month, and when they seemed
-to be on the point of being settled, as usual by the Porte yielding in
-the matter, it was found that Prince Milan had changed his mind,
-and would have no armistice at all.</p>
-
-<p>What had occurred in the interval to account for this change
-of front?</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">264</a></span></p>
-
-<p>On the 24th September, Consul‐General White writes to Sir
-Henry Elliot<a name="FNanchor_36_36" id="FNanchor_36_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_36" class="fnanchor">36</a> “that the last six weeks have produced an important
-change in the affairs of Servia. The Civil Government has ceased
-to have a voice in public affairs; the presence of Russian officers,
-some of them officers of the Imperial Guard, the courage and
-enthusiasm with which they are animated, the growing influence of
-the Slavonic Committees through their agents, have all given a
-warlike tone to what is called public opinion here.... The Russians
-present here say openly that it is their aim and object to prevent the
-conclusions of peace.” And again, on 4th October 1876, he writes
-to Lord Derby:<a name="FNanchor_37_37" id="FNanchor_37_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_37" class="fnanchor">37</a> “It may be interesting for your Lordship to hear
-that money appears abundant in the Servian Exchequer, and
-although the Ministers deny that it is derived from Russian sources,
-it is quite impossible to account in any other way for its origin.”</p>
-
-<p>But something more particular must have occurred to encourage
-Prince Milan to order on the 26th September, the very next
-day on which the suspension of hostilities terminated, a general
-attack on the Turks in the Morava Valley. What was it? On the
-28th September 1876, Mr Malet (afterwards Sir Edward Malet),
-writing from Rome to Lord Derby,<a name="FNanchor_38_38" id="FNanchor_38_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_38" class="fnanchor">38</a> states that Sig. Melegari, the
-Minister for Foreign Affairs, in order to convince him “of the
-imminence of the danger to the Ottoman Empire” read the following
-paper to him, as coming from Livadia, adding that England alone
-was able to avert the execution of the design by “compelling” the
-Porte to acquiesce in His Lordship’s demands. The paper was dated
-26th September, and ran as follows: “The Emperor has sent General
-Soumarakoff to Vienna with instructions to propose a peace, should
-Turkey attempt to evade the armistice, upon conditions that would
-suit all the Powers, viz. Austrian military intervention in Bosnia,
-Russian military intervention in Bulgaria, and the joint entry of all
-the squadrons of the Levant into the Bosphorus. These steps appear
-to us indispensable in order to bring the Porte to its senses, to
-prevent war, and save the Christians from a general massacre.”<a name="FNanchor_39_39" id="FNanchor_39_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_39" class="fnanchor">39</a></p>
-
-<p>This <em>grandis epistola a Capreis</em> which frightened Mr
-Malet so much that he immediately telegraphed its substance to
-Lord Derby, and which was, no doubt, intended to frighten Lord
-Derby, had no chance at all of being accepted at Vienna, and if
-the constant and continuous intercourse between the three Northern
-“and allied Powers” was to any purpose at all, it is quite impossible
-that the nature of the reception it should meet with there, should
-have been ignored. It could therefore only have been intended as
-a “spur” to the Foreign Office, and it succeeded admirably in its
-intention.</p>
-
-<p>It is scarcely worth while to waste many words over the proposal
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">265</a></span>from Livadia. Austria feared nothing so much as a joint occupation
-with Russia. It would have been a guarantee exacted from her
-for her own eventual simultaneous retirement, which would have
-upset all her plans. Nor was England yet brought up to concert
-pitch. But the notice had served its purpose. England, a little
-timorously, and with the best intentions towards Turkey, and with
-the general approval and even applause of Europe,<a name="FNanchor_40_40" id="FNanchor_40_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_40" class="fnanchor">40</a> had undertaken
-the lead in proposing terms to Turkey as a basis of pacification. As
-early as the 11th September Count Schouvaloff in an interview
-described “(1) The <em>status quo</em>, speaking roughly, both as regards
-Servia and Montenegro. (2) Administrative reforms in the nature
-of local autonomy for Bosnia and the Herzegovina. (3) Guarantees of
-some similar kinds (the exact details of which might be reserved for
-later discussion) against the future maladministration of Bulgaria.”<a name="FNanchor_41_41" id="FNanchor_41_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_41" class="fnanchor">41</a></p>
-
-<p>Ten days later, on the 21st September, Lord Derby, having in
-the meantime secured the agreement of the Austrian Government<a name="FNanchor_42_42" id="FNanchor_42_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_42" class="fnanchor">42</a>
-to these proposals, these terms were forwarded to Sir H. Elliot for
-communication to the Porte. The second condition relating to
-Bosnia and Herzegovina was amplified by the important stipulation
-“that the Porte should undertake, <em>in a Protocol to be signed at
-Constantinople with the Representatives of the mediatory Powers</em>, to
-grant, etc.”<a name="FNanchor_43_43" id="FNanchor_43_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_43" class="fnanchor">43</a></p>
-
-<p>Sir H. Elliot, in obedience to positive instructions, went to the
-utmost limit of friendly pressure<a name="FNanchor_44_44" id="FNanchor_44_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44_44" class="fnanchor">44</a> to induce the Porte to accept these
-conditions. The Porte, on its side, showed the greatest possible
-desire to meet the wishes of the English Ambassador.<a name="FNanchor_45_45" id="FNanchor_45_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_45" class="fnanchor">45</a> The term
-“local autonomy,” and still more the form of a Protocol demanded,
-were the two most serious obstacles to an understanding. So great
-was Sir H. Elliot’s influence on the Turkish Minister, and so great
-was their confidence in England’s loyalty, that an understanding was
-almost arrived at when the news of General Soumarakoff’s Mission
-reached the Porte. On the 4th October, the new Turkish Government
-telegraphed to the Ottoman Ambassador in London an
-indignant protest against the proposals of which that envoy was the
-bearer, and concluded by saying: “If the Sublime Porte has, though
-challenged (by Servia), not made use of her victory, she will never
-forget that she is still an independent State, and that she owes it to
-herself to choose an honourable death rather than the dismemberment
-and partition of her States.”<a name="FNanchor_46_46" id="FNanchor_46_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_46_46" class="fnanchor">46</a></p>
-
-<p>This incident did not facilitate Sir H. Elliot’s task. On the day
-following the 5th October, Lord Derby instructs Sir H. Elliot to
-inform the Porte that it is intended that the armistice should be
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">266</a></span>followed by a Conference, and that if an armistice for not less than
-a month is not granted, the Ambassador was to quit Constantinople
-and leave Turkey to its fate.<a name="FNanchor_47_47" id="FNanchor_47_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47_47" class="fnanchor">47</a></p>
-
-<p>On the 8th October, the Porte asks the very pertinent question
-whether, in the event of the conditions being accepted, a Conference
-would still be proposed.<a name="FNanchor_48_48" id="FNanchor_48_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48_48" class="fnanchor">48</a> No answer seems ever to have been given
-to this important question.</p>
-
-<p>The Turkish Ministers now submitted the question of the armistice
-to a Grand Council, which acceded to it for five months.<a name="FNanchor_49_49" id="FNanchor_49_49"></a><a href="#Footnote_49_49" class="fnanchor">49</a> On the
-13th October, in a long telegram to Musurus Pasha, the Porte makes
-a last despairing attempt to stay the decision for a Conference, which
-it says “will at least give rise to the danger of certain impulses on
-which head we have the right to be anxious, and which in reality
-would be of no use. The five months’ armistice would leave ample
-time for the Powers to exchange explanations and observations without
-any Conference. During this time, the work of internal reform would
-go on, and Europe would have the opportunity of being edified as to
-the serious and practical character of the promises of the Imperial
-Government,” and concluded by saying, referring evidently to the
-negotiations with Sir H. Elliot, “I hope His Lordship will agree with
-us in preventing the question, <em>which was just beginning to look
-brighter</em>, thanks to so many sacrifices and efforts, from being turned
-into a path of new difficulties and perils.”<a name="FNanchor_50_50" id="FNanchor_50_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_50_50" class="fnanchor">50</a></p>
-
-<p>If it had not been for the Soumarakoff Mission, and the scare it
-created in the Foreign Office, it would have been an inexplicable
-mystery why Lord Derby, abandoning negotiations carried on by
-Sir H. Elliot, which “were just beginning to look brighter,” should
-have hurriedly fathered this proposal of a Conference. If the
-Soumarakoff Mission was only intended to secure this point, it was
-most eminently successful. Anyway, from this time forth, Lord Derby
-stuck grimly to a Conference. Without a Conference there was no
-salvation. The question, however, of the duration of the armistice
-was not yet settled, and as England, having accepted six months,
-could not recant, General Ignatieff arrived from Livadia to settle it.</p>
-
-<p>But here an incident occurred of a too charmingly amusing
-character to be passed over in silence. <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">La note comique</i> is never
-entirely absent from these negotiations. Lord Adolphus Loftus,
-Her Britannic Majesty’s Ambassador at St Petersburg, received leave
-in the middle of October to go to the Crimea, whither the Russian
-Court had removed, and where Prince Gortchakoff, the Chancellor,
-was slaying, in order to be nearer the official source of diplomatic
-information. On Friday, the 27th, accordingly, he arrived at Yalta,
-accompanied by Mr Egerton of his Embassy. On Sunday, the 29th,
-he had an interview at Orianda with Prince Gortchakoff, “who received
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_267" id="Page_267">267</a></span>
-him very cordially, and after some friendly remarks, the
-conversation turned to Constantinople.” After stating that the state
-of affairs there was grave, the Chancellor expressed “a hope that the
-question of the armistice was arranged, the Porte having, on the
-advice of Sir H. Elliot, yielded to the considerations in favour of the
-shorter term.” His Highness further stated “that General Ignatieff
-had been instructed to be yielding and conciliatory on the subject of
-the armistice.”</p>
-
-<p>Two days after this, <i>i.e.</i> on Tuesday, the 31st October, Lord A.
-Loftus “met” Prince Gortchakoff, who, in answer to the question
-whether there was any news from Constantinople, replied that there
-was, but “that he preferred that the Emperor should communicate it.”
-Lord A. Loftus’s audience with the Czar had been arranged for the
-next day, 1st November, but was subsequently postponed till the 2nd.
-Between the accidental meeting with the Chancellor and this
-audience, Lord A. Loftus received the <cite>Journal de St Petersbourg</cite> of
-the 31st October, in which he read that General Ignatieff had presented
-that day an ultimatum to the Porte to conclude an armistice
-with Servia, and had required an answer within forty‐eight hours.
-So that the English Ambassador, having traversed the whole length
-of Europe in a four days’ journey with a secretary of his Embassy
-attached to him, in order to be near the fountain of official information,
-would have received the news two days sooner if he had stayed at
-home!</p>
-
-<p>We will let Lord A. Loftus describe his audience on the 2nd at
-Livadia, himself: “I had an audience with the Emperor of Russia
-to‐day at Livadia, when His Majesty was pleased to receive me with
-his customary kindness and cordiality (<i>sic</i>). After some gracious
-enquiries after my family, His Majesty at once opened on the Eastern
-question. His Majesty stated that he had that morning received a
-telegram from Constantinople announcing the probable acceptance
-of the armistice, and he read to me another telegram reporting that
-orders had been already sent by the Porte to their commanders to
-suspend military operations. This, His Majesty observed, was very
-satisfactory. On my observing on the <em>sudden change which had taken
-place between the Sunday when I had seen the Chancellor and the
-following day when the ultimatum was despatched</em>, His Majesty said
-that this had been caused by the intelligence he had received of the
-complete discomfiture of the Servian army, and his fear that it
-might be followed by similar atrocities to those which had occurred
-in Bulgaria....”<a name="FNanchor_51_51" id="FNanchor_51_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_51_51" class="fnanchor">51</a></p>
-
-<p>It would indeed be a pity to spoil the uniqueness of this <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">tableau</i>
-by any superfluous commentary, but a despatch from Sir H. Elliot
-at Constantinople, dated on the same day as this audience
-(2nd November), throws some further light on this already luminous
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">268</a></span>incident. “In the course of conversation this morning with General
-Ignatieff, I remarked that I understood that he had returned from
-Livadia with instructions to present his ultimatum. He answered
-<em>that he had brought it with him</em> with a discretionary authority to
-withhold it if he thought desirable. <em>This is a rather different version</em>
-from that which he had previously given to my colleagues and myself,
-when he told us on Tuesday (31st October) that he <em>had received the
-ultimatum two days before</em>, and that he had taken on himself the
-responsibility of withholding it, but had now imperative orders to
-execute his instructions. It is impossible to doubt that he had kept
-his Government fully informed of the progress of his negotiations
-with the Porte, or that they were perfectly well aware that his own
-proposals had been accepted with very trifling modifications, upon
-which an understanding could very easily be arrived at. It is evident
-enough that the sudden sending in of the ultimatum was decided
-upon in the hope that by an immediate cessation of hostilities, and
-the acceptance of an armistice, the fall of Alexinatz would be averted.
-The capture of the Servian positions at Junis made it certain that
-“the occupation of Alexinatz and Deligrad would soon follow, and
-the only hope of saving the Servians and the Russian Auxiliary troops
-from this mortification lay in the chance of stopping the Turks before
-they had time to reap the fruits of their success.”<a name="FNanchor_52_52" id="FNanchor_52_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_52_52" class="fnanchor">52</a></p>
-
-<p>But, independently of the object lesson in veracity that this
-narrative inculcates, it gives the measure of the value attached by
-the Emperor of Russia to the European concert, and the degree to
-which it was likely to hamper his own liberty of action whenever he
-thought proper to liberate himself from it. The <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">procédé</i> with regard
-to the British Ambassador only concerns the British Government.</p>
-
-<p>The Porte had yielded to the ultimatum.</p>
-
-<p>In the meantime negotiations for assembling a Conference continued.
-The Czar had expressed to the English Ambassador “a very
-earnest wish that the Conference should meet with the <em>least possible
-delay</em>, and that instructions should even be immediately sent by the
-several Governments to enable the Ambassadors at Constantinople
-to deliberate <em>at once</em> on the necessary preliminaries of peace.”<a name="FNanchor_53_53" id="FNanchor_53_53"></a><a href="#Footnote_53_53" class="fnanchor">53</a> Prince
-Gortchakoff, too, <em>expressed his anxious wish</em> that on the arrangement
-of the armistice <em>no time should be lost</em> in organising a Conference.<a name="FNanchor_54_54" id="FNanchor_54_54"></a><a href="#Footnote_54_54" class="fnanchor">54</a></p>
-
-<p>But Austria was coy. The term “local autonomy” accompanied
-by no matter what gloss, seriously perturbed her; and yet this was
-the very point on which Russia insisted the most. In reporting his
-conversation with Prince Gortchakoff at Orianda, Lord A. Loftus
-said: “It is evident to me that Prince Gortchakoff does not wish to
-make the question of the armistice the ground for a rupture with the
-Porte, and that he <em>looks to the question of the ‘autonomy of the three
-Provinces’ as being the important deciding point of peace or war</em>.”<a name="FNanchor_55_55" id="FNanchor_55_55"></a><a href="#Footnote_55_55" class="fnanchor">55</a></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">269</a></span></p>
-
-<p>Until Count Andrassy received guarantees that no kind of <em>political</em>
-autonomy was meant, he would have nothing to do with a Conference,
-and it was only when, after a good deal of fencing, this guarantee was
-at last accorded him, that he gave his consent to the proposal.</p>
-
-<p>Although there had been a serious proposal to exclude Turkey
-from the Conference to be held in her own capital to decide on the
-administration of her provinces, the cynical incongruity of the proposition
-had procured its rejection, and now the Porte was asked
-to adhere to it. Without any illusion, since Russia’s ultimatum, as to
-whither the Conference would lead, the Porte, on the 18th November,
-with the sanction of a Grand Council, gave her assent to a proposal,
-the rejection of which would have meant immediate war.</p>
-
-<p>In the course of the six months that intervened between the 13th
-of May (date of the Berlin Note) and the meeting of the Conference
-in December, an apparent contradiction seems to manifest itself
-between the “intimate alliance” of the three Northern Powers (which
-for the purpose of these negotiations means between Austria and
-Russia), and the frictions and disagreements between their respective
-Governments. On no less than five points did this disagreement
-manifest itself: (1) as to whether Turkey should be coerced into an
-armistice, pure and simple, with Servia, or whether a basis of peace
-should, at the same time as the armistice, be proposed;<a name="FNanchor_56_56" id="FNanchor_56_56"></a><a href="#Footnote_56_56" class="fnanchor">56</a> (2) as to
-inculcating prudence of conduct on Servia;<a name="FNanchor_57_57" id="FNanchor_57_57"></a><a href="#Footnote_57_57" class="fnanchor">57</a> (3) as to the joint
-occupation with Russia of the Turkish provinces;<a name="FNanchor_58_58" id="FNanchor_58_58"></a><a href="#Footnote_58_58" class="fnanchor">58</a> (4) as to
-the “autonomy” of the revolted provinces;<a name="FNanchor_59_59" id="FNanchor_59_59"></a><a href="#Footnote_59_59" class="fnanchor">59</a> (5) on the question of the
-Conference.<a name="FNanchor_60_60" id="FNanchor_60_60"></a><a href="#Footnote_60_60" class="fnanchor">60</a></p>
-
-<p>On the other hand, we have seen Count Beust calling at the
-Foreign Office to assure Lord Derby that never was the alliance of
-the three Northern Powers so “intimate”; we have the meeting of
-Reichstadt, and General Soumarakoff delivering an autograph letter
-from the Czar to the Emperor of Austria, and we have a very
-mysterious communication from Lord A. Loftus on the 15th August
-1876, in which he says: “In speaking of Austria, Prince Gortchakoff
-again repeated to me that he had fully discussed the question of a
-pacification with Count Andrassy, and <em>that they were entirely agreed
-on all points and for all eventualities</em>. ‘I can state no more,’ said the
-Chancellor, ‘but that much I can tell you, as I have done to your
-Colleagues; and I can add that our Ambassadors at the other Courts
-know no more than you do.’ This language,” continues Lord A. Loftus,
-“though, perhaps, satisfactory ... is mysterious, and we can only
-unravel the mystery by conjectures.”<a name="FNanchor_61_61" id="FNanchor_61_61"></a><a href="#Footnote_61_61" class="fnanchor">61</a></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">270</a></span></p>
-
-<p>Perhaps the mystery, as Lord A. Loftus calls it, is not so
-mysterious after all. A reference to what took place in another
-diplomatic discussion in 1859 will help to unravel it without the aid
-of much conjecture. In that year Mr Disraeli startled the House
-of Commons by informing it, on the faith of information on which he
-relied, that there was a secret treaty between Italy and France
-for the cession to the latter Power of the provinces of Savoy and
-Nice. Lord Palmerston denied the existence of any such treaty,
-and twitted Mr Disraeli with having discovered a mare’s nest.
-When Mr Disraeli’s information was proved to be substantially
-correct, Lord Palmerston explained that there had been no treaty
-but a mere <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">pacte de famille</i> agreed upon on the occasion of the
-marriage of the Princess Clotilde to Prince Jerome Napoleon. The
-mystery that puzzled Lord A. Loftus is easily unravelled. There
-was undoubtedly a distinct and specific understanding between the
-two Emperors; but none between their Governments; so that Lord
-Derby could, on the 20th October, write to Sir A. Buchanan that
-“The Austro‐Hungarian Ambassador called upon me to‐day, and
-informed me, by order of his Government, that the reports which
-have been recently, and are still, current as to the existence of a
-secret understanding <em>between the Austrian and Russian Governments</em>
-are absolutely unfounded.”<a name="FNanchor_62_62" id="FNanchor_62_62"></a><a href="#Footnote_62_62" class="fnanchor">62</a> In countries and ages where the letter
-of a declaration is considered more important than its spirit, such
-hair‐splitting distinctions may pass current. At any rate, they serve
-their purpose.</p></div>
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">271</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>APPENDIX B<br /><br />
-
-<small>THE INSURRECTION OF HERZEGOVINA AND BOSNIA,
-AND THE BERLIN NOTE</small></h2>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p><span class="smcap">On</span> the 2nd July 1875, Consul Holmes, writing to Lord Derby from
-Bosna‐Serai, says:<a name="FNanchor_63_63" id="FNanchor_63_63"></a><a href="#Footnote_63_63" class="fnanchor">63</a> “I have the honour to report to your Lordship
-that there is disturbance in the Herzegovina. Early last winter some
-164 of the inhabitants of the district of Nevesinje left their homes and
-went into Montenegro. After remaining there some months, however,
-they petitioned the Porte to be allowed to return to Nevesinje. The
-Governor‐General advised the Porte to reply, that, as they had
-chosen to leave their country for Montenegro, they might remain
-there. The Government, however, decided to grant their request,
-and allowed them to return. Shortly afterwards they appeared in
-revolt, declared that they were oppressed, refusing to pay their taxes
-or admit the police amongst them, and they have been endeavouring
-by intimidation to cause their neighbours in the surrounding districts
-to join them. The Mutesarif of Mostar invited them to come to that
-place to state their grievances, which he assured them would be redressed,
-but they refused, and the Governor‐General tells me that
-they cut to pieces a man quite unconnected with them, who had gone
-to Mostar to seek redress for some grievance, and threatened with
-the same fate any within their reach who should do so in future. The
-Governor‐General informs me that at present he has no intention of
-sending troops against them, but will prevent their efforts to extend
-their revolt by surrounding those districts with policemen, and he
-will probably send some of the notables of Serajevo to endeavour to
-bring them to reason.”</p>
-
-<p>In a subsequent despatch dated a week later, Consul Holmes adds
-that “Haidar Bey and Petrarchi Effendi, two notables of Serajevo,
-were sent to communicate with the rebels, but before they reached
-Nevesinje they found that the rebels had forced and persuaded many
-others to join them, and had attacked and captured a caravan of
-twenty‐five horses on the road from Mostar to Nevesinje, belonging to
-some merchants of Serajevo, laden with rice, sugar, and coffee, which
-they carried off to the village of Odrichnia. At the same time, they
-murdered and decapitated five Turkish travellers, named Salih,
-Hassosunovich, Marich, Sarnich, Ali of Nevesinje, and another whose
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">272</a></span>name is not yet known, a native of Erassni. One of the insurgents,
-named Tschoubate, at the head of some three hundred followers,
-drove away forty Zaptiés placed in the defile of Stolatz, and,
-separating into small bands, have, for the moment, interrupted the
-various roads in the neighbourhood. One band is stationed out at
-the bridge over the Krappa, and renders the road between Mostar
-and Meteorich unsafe. The detached bands of insurgents are
-endeavouring to force others to join them by burning the houses of
-those who refuse to do so, and by other means of intimidation. The
-Governor‐General has received telegrams from Mostar signed by the
-two Commissioners and the Mutesarif and Commander of the troops
-at Mostar, stating these facts; also that the headless bodies of the
-Turks have been recovered and burnt. Under these circumstances,
-the Commissioners hesitated to continue their journey; and the
-authorities at Mostar state that great excitement prevails throughout
-the Mussulman population, who are impatient to attack the insurgents
-and avenge the savage murders of their co‐religionists, whose
-decapitation has particularly roused their feelings, and requesting five
-battalions to keep order.”<a name="FNanchor_64_64" id="FNanchor_64_64"></a><a href="#Footnote_64_64" class="fnanchor">64</a></p>
-
-<p>The methods adopted by the insurgents were the same as those
-adopted in Bulgaria, and wherever an organised attempt at insurrection
-was made in the Ottoman provinces by agents <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">provocateurs</i> and
-foreign bands with a view to provoke the Mussulmans to deeds of
-retaliation which would be exploited by the Committees and excite
-indignation in the world. It will be remembered that when Midhat
-Pasha was Governor of the Danubian vilayet (p. 43), the band that
-crossed into Bulgaria from Sistovo began by massacring five
-Mussulman children between the ages of eight and twelve. When
-the Consuls, sent on a peace message to the insurgents visited
-Nevesinje, they “found all the Eastern part of the town towards the
-plain and all the bazaar, burnt and in ruins. Dead bodies were lying
-in various corners unburied; and we noticed the head of a boy in one
-of the streets blackening in the sun. A little Turkish girl was
-brought to us, wounded in the throat, and we were told that an
-insurgent was on the point of cutting off her head when she was
-snatched from him by one less bloodthirsty, and allowed to escape.”<a name="FNanchor_65_65" id="FNanchor_65_65"></a><a href="#Footnote_65_65" class="fnanchor">65</a></p>
-
-<p>Another aim of the insurgents was to force an emigration <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">en masse</i>
-into Austrian territory by promises that they should be well fed and
-cared for by the Austrian authorities until favourable conditions were
-secured for them. Montenegro, too, was let loose on Turkey and
-well supplied with the sinews of war. It was determined at Vienna
-that no time should be lost in “putting their pin in the game,”
-and in taking the lead in negotiations that must necessarily
-precede an occupation. The principle of interference once admitted,
-all the rest would follow in due course. On the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">273</a></span>24th August 1875, Lord Derby writes to Sir H. Elliot that: “Her
-Majesty’s Government have had under their consideration your
-telegraphic despatch of the 20th inst., in which you report that a
-proposal, <em>concerted at Vienna by the three Northern Powers</em>, had been
-made to the Porte by their Ambassadors. Your Excellency states
-that they propose that Consuls should be delegated by the Embassies
-to proceed to the scene of the insurrection and inform the insurgents
-that they must expect no support or countenance from their Governments.
-They are also to advise the insurgents to desist from
-hostilities, but to make known their complaints to a Commission....
-The proposal is favourably received by the Porte, and the
-Grand Vizier (Mahmoud Nedim) had just been to beg you not to
-stand aloof.... Her Majesty’s Government consent to this step
-with reluctance, <cite>as they doubt the expediency of the intervention of
-foreign consuls. Such an intervention is scarcely compatible with
-the independent authority of the Porte over its own territory, offers an
-inducement to an insurrection as a means of appealing to foreign
-sympathy against Turkish rule, and may, not improbably, open the
-way to further diplomatic interference in the internal affairs of the
-Empire.</cite>”<a name="FNanchor_66_66" id="FNanchor_66_66"></a><a href="#Footnote_66_66" class="fnanchor">66</a> Prophetic words on the part of Lord Derby. Of course
-the consular farce came to nothing. The rebels would not even
-meet the Consuls. Facts were more eloquent than words, and they
-had their cues from the Committees. Now was the time, if the
-Powers had been in earnest, to shut the Dalmatian frontier to the
-rebels, as they had undertaken to do. We shall see how Austria
-fulfilled this part of the bargain. Instead of occupying themselves
-in the slightest degree with this part of the business, they immediately
-set about concocting another diplomatic move.</p>
-
-<p>On 11th December 1875, the Austrian Ambassador, Count
-Beust, called on Lord Derby, and said that “The Turkish Ministers
-had hitherto directed their energies exclusively to the task of preventing
-anything which could be construed into an interference of any
-kind with the internal affairs of Turkey. This standpoint, however
-respectable it may be, has the disadvantage the Austro‐Hungarian
-Government considered, of prolonging a regrettable state of things,
-and therefore of aggravating the danger. <em>Negotiations respecting
-the affairs of the East are now being carried on between Vienna
-and St Petersburg</em>, the result of which will be communicated as
-soon as an agreement has been arrived at, to Her Majesty’s Government,
-not in the light of an accomplished fact, but for their consideration,
-and for them to state their own opinions on the
-propositions agreed upon.”<a name="FNanchor_67_67" id="FNanchor_67_67"></a><a href="#Footnote_67_67" class="fnanchor">67</a></p>
-
-<p>On the 3rd January 1876, Lord Derby received from Count Beust
-a copy of the famous despatch, which goes by the name of the
-Andrassy Memorandum, of the 30th December 1875, which, after
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_274" id="Page_274">274</a></span>stating that the three Courts of Austria‐Hungary, Russia, and
-Germany, after exchanging their views on this subject, “have united
-for the purpose of employing in common their efforts for pacification,
-and this object appeared too much in conformity with the general
-wish for them to doubt that <em>the other Cabinets when invited to
-associate themselves in the movement</em>, through their representatives
-at Constantinople, would hasten to join their efforts to ours,” proceeded
-to recommend to the Porte the following five points:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="indent3">(1) Full and entire religious liberty.</p>
-
-<p class="indent3">(2) Abolition of the system of farming the taxes.</p>
-
-<p class="indent3">(3) A law guaranteeing the produce of direct taxes being employed
-in the interest of the provinces.</p>
-
-<p class="indent3">(4) The institution of a special commission composed of an equal
-number of Christians and Mussulmans, to control the
-execution of the reforms.</p>
-
-<p class="indent3">(5) The improvement of the position of the rural population.</p>
-
-<p>And in submitting these proposals to the English Minister, Count
-Beust added that “they were not regarded by his Government in the
-light of mere good advice. <em>They wanted a pledge</em> that the reforms
-that they recommended should be carried into execution, failing
-which, they would not undertake to use their influence with the
-Christian population to advise them to lay down their arms.”<a name="FNanchor_68_68" id="FNanchor_68_68"></a><a href="#Footnote_68_68" class="fnanchor">68</a> And in
-another interview, the next day, he spoke again of an “explicit
-engagement” from the Porte, adding that “there could be no doubt
-that the postponement of the pacifying influences of the Powers <em>even
-by single days</em> might in the present state of affairs be fraught
-with incalculable danger.”<a name="FNanchor_69_69" id="FNanchor_69_69"></a><a href="#Footnote_69_69" class="fnanchor">69</a> The Austrian Government, however,
-repudiated any idea “of armed intervention, and stated that it
-had no desire to constitute itself guardians of the peace beyond its
-own frontiers,” and that if the Porte accepted, and the insurgents
-did not submit, “then the Porte would be left to subdue them by
-force of arms, and that they (the insurgents) would be prevented from
-obtaining the support derived by them from exterior aid.”<a name="FNanchor_70_70" id="FNanchor_70_70"></a><a href="#Footnote_70_70" class="fnanchor">70</a></p>
-
-<p>This was six months after the so‐called insurrection had broken
-out, and had been all the time “obtaining continuous support from
-exterior aid,” and three months after the Consular Commission,
-which had been obtained from the Porte by a formal promise to shut
-the frontier to the rebels if they refused the advice of the Consuls.
-Lord Derby, after distinctly stating that he would be no party to any
-pressure being brought to bear on the Porte to carry out these
-reforms, and having ascertained that the Turkish Government
-desired England’s adhesion to the Note, consented to support it at
-Constantinople.</p>
-
-<p>In connection with this famous Memorandum, it is interesting to
-note an interpolation that took place in the Hungarian Diet on
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_275" id="Page_275">275</a></span>11th March with respect to it. In answer to Deputy Pollit, Mr Tisza,
-the Minister President, stated “in the answer to the question as to
-whether the Hungarian Government approves of the intervention,
-<em>there is no question of intervention, but only of good advice</em>, which
-had been given in concert with the European Powers, and which
-had been accepted in the most friendly manner by the Porte....
-In answer to the question as to the action of Hungary if the
-pacification was not effected, and if Servia intervened, <em>such an
-eventuality was most improbable</em> ... but in that case the policy
-of the Empire would be guided by the interests of Europe....
-With reference to the question of the refugees, the Empire had not
-disregarded the interests of humanity ... as was shown by the
-subvention amounting to nearly 1,000,000 florins which had been
-already given to them.... The speaker concluded by expressing
-a hope that the House would accept his explanation.” If they did,
-they were easily satisfied, these Hungarian Deputies. Not a word
-about the capital question of shutting the frontier to the rebels.
-Servia, too, was arming to the teeth, and was to declare war on
-Turkey three months later.</p>
-
-<p>We shall see the literal fulfilment of this prediction. Bosnia was
-the first to follow suit with the Herzegovina. On the 8th February
-1876, Sir H. Elliot writes to Lord Derby: “The Porte is much
-disturbed by the unsatisfactory account received from the Governor‐General
-of Bosnia, who has applied for fresh troops. <em>Bands supposed
-to consist of old Grenzers are stated to have passed the Save from
-Austria at four different points, but have been repulsed. The body
-which invaded Bosnia is stated to have consisted of 400 or 500 men all
-well‐armed.</em> Much excitement is said to prevail on both sides of the
-Servian frontier, and apprehensions are entertained of an aggression
-from that quarter. Reschid Pasha tells me that Count Zichy has
-given him, on the part of Count Andrassy, the strongest assurance
-... that measures shall be adopted to prevent the recurrence of such
-acts, and has promised ... that those who have taken part in them
-shall be disarmed and <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">internés</i>.”<a name="FNanchor_71_71" id="FNanchor_71_71"></a><a href="#Footnote_71_71" class="fnanchor">71</a></p>
-
-<p>It would be difficult to carry intentional bad faith further. All
-this time, notes and memorandums were flying about the Chancelleries
-of Europe to force the Porte to give guarantees for
-suppressing an insurrection which was being organised and fed by
-bands “all well‐armed” across a friendly frontier, its suppression
-being thus rendered materially impossible. As well might one try
-to extinguish a conflagration, over an unlimited area, that was being
-continually fed by petroleum springs, the sources of which could not
-be got at. Nor let it be supposed that to guard such a line of frontier
-was impossible. The rebels had it all their own way. And so had the
-Diplomatists of the “Allied Courts of Berlin, Vienna, and St Petersburg.”
-Russian Committees were joining their efforts to Austrian.</p>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">276</a></span></p>
-<p>On the 14th February 1876, Sir H. Elliot writes to Lord Derby:
-“The accounts of the encouragement given to the insurgents at
-Ragusa greatly exceeds all that I was prepared for. The Russian
-Consulate is the open resort of the insurgent chiefs; their correspondence
-is sent to the Consul, who is a party to all their projects,
-and associates himself intimately with them. He does not appear
-to make any attempt to conceal the part he is playing, for on the
-occasion of the death of the chief Maxima, in one of the late encounters,
-the Russian flag at the Consulate was hoisted at half‐mast,
-and M. Jomini himself joined the funeral procession.</p>
-
-<p>“Some of the wounded when asked why they continue the struggle
-when the Porte is ready to grant all their demands, have answered
-plainly that they are bound to go on as long as they are told by
-Russia to do so. The assurances given at St Petersburg of the wish
-of the Imperial Government that the insurgents would lay down their
-arms, must naturally go for nothing as long as its official Representative,
-with whom they are in communication, encourages them to
-go on.”<a name="FNanchor_72_72" id="FNanchor_72_72"></a><a href="#Footnote_72_72" class="fnanchor">72</a> Pretty plain speaking this! and Austria that continued
-the “exequatur” to a foreign Consul, acting thus on its territory
-towards a friendly Power. So gross and palpable was this assistance
-given by Austria to the insurgents, whilst pretending all the time to
-be so keenly anxious for its suppression, that Lord Derby thought it
-necessary on the 10th March 1876, to give the following instructions
-to Sir A. Buchanan, the English Ambassador at Vienna: “I have to
-inform Your Excellency that it has come to the knowledge of Her
-Majesty’s Government, through Her Majesty’s Ambassador at Constantinople,
-that the Porte had received information that a severe
-fight took place on the Dalmatian frontier on the 4th inst., and
-that on the following day, the combat was renewed by a force
-said to be <em>700 strong, who came from Austrian territory with
-large supplies of ammunition, and that this having occurred so immediately
-after the assurances of the Austro‐Hungarian Government
-that their frontier would be officially guarded</em>, has caused great discouragement
-to the Turkish Government, and it is feared that the
-effect of it in Montenegro will be very mischievous, and I have therefore
-to request Your Excellency to call the serious attention of the
-Imperial Government to this matter.”<a name="FNanchor_73_73" id="FNanchor_73_73"></a><a href="#Footnote_73_73" class="fnanchor">73</a> But these remonstrances,
-which were evidently sincere and well‐meaning, had not the very
-slightest effect at Vienna. The Hungarian Chancellor was always
-ready to give any amount of assurances and promises to the credulous
-Sir A. Buchanan. On the 3rd April 1876, Sir H. Elliot was
-obliged to write again: “I learn that the Porte has received information
-of the passage of considerable bands <em>said to be accompanied
-by two pieces of artillery</em> from Dalmatia and Croatia, into the north‐western
-district of Bosnia.”<a name="FNanchor_74_74" id="FNanchor_74_74"></a><a href="#Footnote_74_74" class="fnanchor">74</a> And further, on the next day, 4th April,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">277</a></span>
-he writes: “A telegram from the Governor‐General of Bosnia,
-which has been read to me by Reschid Pasha, gives a very alarming
-account of the state of things in that province. <em>Armed bands are
-passing freely from the Austrian territory</em>, and there are symptoms
-indicating a probable insurrection of the populations along the rivers
-Save and Una. The Governor‐General states that he has been
-unable to re‐establish the line of telegraph along the Save, <em>as the
-workmen are continually fired at from the Austrian bank of the river,
-and his remonstrances addressed to the Austrian authorities have been
-unattended to</em>.”<a name="FNanchor_75_75" id="FNanchor_75_75"></a><a href="#Footnote_75_75" class="fnanchor">75</a> The reason why Austria was not content to confine
-her operations to Herzegovina, but had extended them to Bosnia, was
-clear. The Porte was succeeding, in spite of all difficulties, in pacifying
-the former, and as the Berlin note was being drawn up at Berlin
-for the three “Allied Powers” and would be presented in a month,
-such a precipitation would derange all their plans.</p>
-
-<p>The following despatch of Sir H. Elliot of 7th April 1876 clearly
-indicates this state of things. “The enclosed report from Mr
-Sandison of the account received at the Porte from Haidar Effendi
-(the Turkish Commissioner) gives a very serious aspect to the state
-of affairs in Bosnia. It is evident that the Austro‐Hungarian
-Government <em>have failed lamentably in their engagement to guard
-their own frontier, and by means of well‐armed bands coming from
-their territory, a formidable insurrection has been excited in districts
-which have hitherto remained quiet. Although the news received from
-the Herzegovina is good, and gave hopes of a pacification</em>, it would be
-too much to expect that the movement in Bosnia should not produce
-its effect in the districts which have been so long in insurrection.”<a name="FNanchor_76_76" id="FNanchor_76_76"></a><a href="#Footnote_76_76" class="fnanchor">76</a></p>
-
-<p>In the month of May we arrived at another stage of the business.
-It is time that diplomacy should register another point of “terrain
-acquis.” On the 4th May 1876 Lord Derby, writing to Sir A.
-Buchanan, says: “The Austrian Ambassador called upon me this
-afternoon and placed in my hands for perusal a despatch which he
-had received from his Government. The purport of the despatch
-was to state that there is <em>an entire agreement between the Governments
-of Austria, Germany and Russia as to affairs in the East</em>,
-and that any reports that may have been circulated to the contrary
-are simple inventions.”<a name="FNanchor_77_77" id="FNanchor_77_77"></a><a href="#Footnote_77_77" class="fnanchor">77</a></p>
-
-<p>The purport of making this communication could be no other than
-a warning to all whom it may concern, that they could join or not join
-the “European Concert,” as they thought proper. It would make no
-difference to the European Concert. It was a notice certainly calculated
-to open the eyes, even of the blind, to what was going on.</p>
-
-<p>As the fact of armed bands could not be disputed, it was obviously
-the interest of Austria to endeavour to throw the blame on others,
-Montenegro and Servia especially. We shall come to these little</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">278</a></span></p>
-
-<p>States later, but <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">à propos</i> of shifting the blame on Servia, there is
-a very significant despatch from Consul‐General White, dated
-Belgrade, 28th April 1876. “The Prince (of Servia) takes no pains
-to conceal that, more than ever, he considers a collision with the
-Porte as within the range of possibilities; but he continues to
-disclaim at the same time any intention to act as the aggressor.
-He pointed out to me the other day that the portion of Bosnia which
-is conterminous to Servia has been entirely free from armed bands
-since last November, when the Papas Zarko was repulsed into Servia,
-<em>whilst the insurgents who had within the last few weeks made their
-appearance on the river Unna between Bihatch, Novi and Kostainitza,
-were all in proximity to the Austrian frontier</em>, and he defied anyone to
-show that Servia had been instrumental in fostering insurrection in
-that department of Bosnia, though he added that such an accusation
-had been made somewhere, evidently alluding to Austrian Authorities.”<a name="FNanchor_78_78" id="FNanchor_78_78"></a><a href="#Footnote_78_78" class="fnanchor">78</a>
-The explanation of these apparent mysteries was really simple enough.
-Servia was reserving herself for Bulgaria, which was within the sphere
-of her action, as she herself was within the orbit of Russia’s influence,
-and she had no intention of playing Austria’s game for Austria’s sole
-benefit.</p>
-
-<p>Unless strongly backed by Russia, Servia knew well enough that
-Austria, posted in the conterminous province of Bosnia, would be a
-most awkward neighbour, and render any hope of future independence
-on her part purely illusory. Turkey’s yoke would be light indeed in
-comparison to that of Austria, if she were surrounded on three sides
-by the Kaiserlich. A great deal of the apparent contradiction, see‐sawing
-and hesitation of this period is to be accounted for by these
-conflicting inner currents, set in motion by two of the three allied
-Governments, whose agreement Count Beust was instructed to inform
-Lord Derby was “entire.” It was entire as regarded Turkey, there
-was no doubt about that, but there was a very pretty little by‐play going
-on besides, within the circle of the larger drama. No wonder this state
-of things created a situation, as Consul Holmes pithily described it,
-“in which everyone seems to profess precisely what he fails to
-practise.”</p>
-
-<h3>BERLIN NOTE.</h3>
-
-<p>Whatever light friction there may have been between Russia and
-Austria in the Spring of 1876, it seems to have been smoothed over,
-probably by the intervention of the third disinterested partner in the
-Alliance; for on Saturday, the 13th May 1876, Lord Odo Russell, the
-British Ambassador at Berlin, received an invitation from Prince
-Bismarck to call on him that day in order to meet Count Andrassy
-and Prince Gortchakoff, together with the Ambassadors of France
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">279</a></span>and Italy; M. de Bülow and Baron Jomini were also present at the
-interview. “After a few preliminary words from Prince Bismarck,
-Prince Gortchakoff and Count Andrassy confirmed the cordial
-understanding that exists between them, and expressed their sincere
-hope and anxious desire that the Governments of England, France
-and Italy, <em>who have given their moral support</em> to the attempted
-pacification of the Herzegovinians, will equally agree to support the
-further attempts they have now met to concert, in consequence of the
-alarming state of affairs in Turkey. Baron Jomini was then invited
-to read the enclosed document to us, and the proposal to which they
-solicit the co‐operation of the Great Powers.... Prince Gortchakoff
-observed that he and Count Andrassy would remain till
-Monday (15th inst.) at Berlin, and that they hoped the Governments
-of England, France and Italy would be able to express an opinion on
-the telegraphic summary of their proposal, before they left.”<a name="FNanchor_79_79" id="FNanchor_79_79"></a><a href="#Footnote_79_79" class="fnanchor">79</a></p>
-
-<p>It is no part of the purport of this book to comment on the
-<i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">procédés</i> of the “three Allied Powers” vis‐à‐vis of the other so‐called
-Great Powers, England, France and Italy. That is a matter of
-their interior <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">ménage</i>. We are exclusively concerned with their
-conduct, severally and collectively, towards Turkey. If it were
-otherwise, one might have something to say concerning the strangeness
-and singularity of the proceeding among Great Powers,
-supposed to stand on a footing of equality, of three of their number
-convoking the rest to hear a document of the very highest international
-importance read to them for their assent to it, if possible
-by telegraph, within two days! But let us proceed with the
-narrative.</p>
-
-<p>The document referred to, which goes in history by the name of
-the “Berlin Note,” was a very curious document. It started with
-the declaration that “the alarming tidings which come from Turkey
-are of a nature to <em>impel the three Cabinets to draw closer their
-intimacy</em>. The three Imperial Courts have deemed themselves
-called upon to concert among themselves measures for averting
-the dangers of the situation, <em>with the concurrence</em> of the other great
-Christian Powers.” After referring to the history of the question up
-to the Andrassy Memorandum, by which the Powers acquire a
-moral right and an obligation to insist on “pacification,” and
-enumerating the causes that have prevented the success of that
-action, and especially the agitation caused by the prolongation of
-the strife in other parts of the Turkish Dominions, and laying stress
-on the deplorable events at Salonica, it declares that it is most
-essential to establish certain guarantees of a nature to insure beyond
-doubt the loyal and full application of the measures agreed upon
-between the Powers and the Porte.”</p>
-
-<p>As the first step in this direction, the three Imperial Courts
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">280</a></span>propose to insist with the Porte on a suspension of arms for two
-months, and to open negotiations between the Porte and the rebel
-delegates <em>on the basis of the wishes that the latter have formulated</em>,
-and which may be enumerated as follows:&mdash;</p>
-
-<p class="indent3">(1) That materials for the reconstruction of their houses should
-be provided the refugees by the Turkish Government.</p>
-
-<p class="indent3">(2) The appointment of a mixed commission to superintend
-reforms.</p>
-
-<p class="indent3">(3) The concentration of the Turkish troops on some points to
-be agreed upon.</p>
-
-<p class="indent3">(4) Christians and Mussulmans to retain their arms.</p>
-
-<p class="indent3">(5) The Consuls or Delegates of the Powers to keep a watch
-over the application of the reforms in general, and on
-the steps relative to the repatriation in particular.</p>
-
-<p>And then the Note concludes: “If, however, the armistice were to
-expire without the efforts of the Powers being successful in attaining
-the end they have in view, the three Imperial Courts are of opinion
-that it would become necessary to supplement their diplomatic action
-by the sanction of an agreement with a view to such efficacious
-measures as might appear to be demanded in the interest of general
-peace, to check the evil and prevent its development.”</p>
-
-<p>It is not intended here to criticise at length these five heads,
-but one interesting and significant point must be noted. The Note
-says, in a passage <em>underlined</em> above, that these five heads were
-framed “on the basis of the wishes formulated by the Bosnian and
-Herzegovinian Delegates.” Who were these Delegates? On the
-27th May, the <cite>Times</cite> quoted an article from the <cite>Nord</cite> of April 1876,
-in which another Note was addressed by one Golub Babitch, in
-the name of the Bosnian insurgent chiefs, confirming full powers on
-one Gabriel Vasilitchki (a Russian subject who had made himself
-very busy in these matters) to treat on their behalf for peace on the
-basis of four points which were absolutely identical with four points
-of the Berlin Note.<a name="FNanchor_80_80" id="FNanchor_80_80"></a><a href="#Footnote_80_80" class="fnanchor">80</a> Now, who was this Golub Babitch, who
-describes himself in this Note as “voivode,” and who signs in the
-name and on the behalf of the “chief Bosnian chiefs”? Mr Consul
-Freeman, who was by no means prejudiced against the insurgents or
-in favour of the Turks, and knew his <cite>monde</cite> well, describes him.
-He was a “former brigand,” now the chief of one of the principal
-bands, consisting of 3000 men, all well armed, that had invaded
-Bosnia.<a name="FNanchor_81_81" id="FNanchor_81_81"></a><a href="#Footnote_81_81" class="fnanchor">81</a></p>
-
-<p>This, then, was the source of the inspiration of the five heads
-of the famous Berlin Note. It might certainly be more justly
-described in history as the “Golub Babitch Note.” The five heads,
-however, seem to have been admirably adapted to secure the object
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">281</a></span>perhaps intended, viz., to perpetrate and aggravate the bloodshed
-between the armed Mussulmans and the armed returning refugees,
-and so by “bleeding Turkey to death” to justify the action of the
-last and most important notice thrown in carelessly, and almost as
-an afterthought, and at the end of the Berlin Note, but which was,
-of course, the whole point of it, viz., that if the measures proposed
-did not produce their effect (or, let us add, produced the exactly
-opposite effect), “the three Imperial Courts would consider it
-necessary to supplement their diplomatic action by the sanction of
-an agreement,” etc., etc. If ever there was a case of the sting being
-in the tail, it was in this “Berlin Note.”</p>
-
-<p>Lord Derby was not deceived either as to the intrinsic value,
-or worthlessness, of the four points which he politely but mercilessly
-dissected in an interview with Count Munster, the German
-Ambassador in London, on the 15th of May 1876,<a name="FNanchor_82_82" id="FNanchor_82_82"></a><a href="#Footnote_82_82" class="fnanchor">82</a> nor was he
-intimidated by the “still closer intimacy of the three Imperial
-Courts,” which the Note ostentatiously declared. France and
-Italy thought fit to adhere to it. The rejection of it by England
-made its rejection by Turkey doubly certain. It was certain in any
-event. The courteous but unshakeable resolution of the English
-Cabinet to have nothing to do with the Berlin Note, in spite of the
-“still closer intimacy of the three Imperial Courts,” and the
-adherence of the other two Cabinets, brought the whole proposal
-down like a house of cards. But the allied quiver was not empty.</p>
-
-<p>A stage, however, was reached in the Berlin Note which it is
-necessary to note carefully, as a new departure, involving a readjustment
-of compasses all round, became henceforth necessary.</p>
-
-<p>We have seen the apparently unaccountable hurry that Austria
-was in to get matters in Bosnia and Herzegovina diplomatically
-settled to her satisfaction. The Consular intervention in August
-1875, the Andrassy Note in December 1875, General Rodich’s
-parley with the insurgents in April 1876, and the Berlin Memorandum
-on 15th May 1876, were the different stages of this pragmatical
-interference. The reason was clear. Austria was quite well aware,
-through her Intelligence Departments, that Russia was making
-superhuman, albeit unofficial, efforts to catch up the advance that
-Austria had secured for her operations in the Turkish provinces,
-and that every day made it less probable that the lead in the
-negotiations would be left in her hands.</p>
-
-<p>We shall see that from this moment, <i>i.e.</i>, on the rejection of the
-Berlin Memorandum, Austria’s precipitation no longer exists, and that
-she takes ample time to readjust her compass to the altered condition
-of things. The principal object of this Appendix being to describe the
-conduct and follow the policy of Austria in these matters, it is
-necessary to examine a little more closely the relations of Austria
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_282" id="Page_282">282</a></span>with Montenegro, end the part played by this principality in this
-so‐called rebellion.</p>
-
-<p>It was generally taken for granted that Montenegro was completely
-and exclusively under Russian influence and protection, that
-it was a citadel and outpost of Russia in this part of the world, and
-that its prince moved in obedience to orders from St Petersburg alone.
-This belief, which assumed the character of an axiom in men’s minds,
-served admirably the purpose of Austria in the general mystification
-with which it suited her to surround her policy at this time.</p>
-
-<p>As the active and effective action of Montenegro in the insurrection
-was a secret to none in Europe, and as Russia exclusively pulled
-the strings which moved its prince, it was obvious that Russia was at
-the bottom of the Herzegovinian insurrection which Austria was
-doing all she could to assist the Porte in suppressing&mdash;<em>quod erat
-demonstrandum</em>. Now, there can be no doubt that Russia had for a
-very long time past preponderating influence in the Black Mountains,
-and that during the whole period that Austria followed what we
-have called her “normal policy” with respect to the Ottoman Empire,
-the influence of Russia over Montenegro was exclusive of any other
-followed in the nature of things; but Consul‐General White, at any
-rate, knew better than to suppose that this meant that no steps had
-been taken by Austria (and the nature of the steps is evident) to
-acquire that influence over the prince that the “new policy” of
-Austria rendered desirable and necessary. In a despatch of the
-25th of February 1876, Consul‐General White, writing from Belgrade
-to Sir H. Elliot, says: “I beg to inform Your Excellency that I have
-been assured, from a source which I have hitherto found reliable,
-that the chief reason that has prompted Prince Milan to assume a
-bolder and quasi‐martial attitude is the growing suspicion in his
-mind that a bait in the shape of an accession of territory was about
-to be offered by Austria on behalf of the Porte to the Prince of
-Montenegro. This opinion is strongly entertained here by persons
-<em>who are supposed to be well acquainted with the nature of the
-relations which have existed during the last two years between the
-Court of Vienna and that Prince</em>.”<a name="FNanchor_83_83" id="FNanchor_83_83"></a><a href="#Footnote_83_83" class="fnanchor">83</a></p>
-
-<p>Not only did money pour into the principality, and arms,
-munitions and military science, as we shall presently see, were
-lavishly provided to these interesting mountaineers, but when the
-conditions of peace between Servia and Montenegro on one side,
-and the Porte on the other, came to be discussed (in the month of
-August 1876), Austria, who opposed the claim for any accession of
-territory to Servia, advocated a considerable extension for
-Montenegro. There can be slight doubt that this was one of the
-conditions of the bargain arranged “during the last two years
-between the Courts of Vienna and that Prince.” It is, of course,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">283</a></span>a noteworthy coincidence that the two years mentioned at the
-beginning of these intimate relations brings us exactly to the date
-when Count Andrassy became Chancellor of the Austro‐Hungarian
-Empire.</p>
-
-<p>Mr Monson, the English political agent at Ragusa&mdash;afterwards sent
-on a special mission to Cettinje, and now H.B.M.’s Ambassador at Paris,
-who will certainly not be accused of prejudice against the Prince of
-Montenegro, by whom, on the contrary, he seems to have been quite
-fascinated, be it said in passing&mdash;in writing to Lord Derby from Ragusa,
-on the 14th June 1876, says: “The town of Ragusa, the capital of Dalmatia,
-is daily visited by armed insurgents who, at Vienna, are represented
-to be peaceful Dalmatians from the rural districts ... or
-Montenegrins on their travels, whose costumes would be incomplete
-without the traditional carbines and poniards.... During the period
-in which the export of munitions of war was suspended, <em>the contraband
-traffic was openly carried on at Ragusa and Meglina without
-hindrance; cases of dynamite were passed across the frontier, to be
-used for the destruction of the Turkish forts and block‐houses</em>; and
-it is alleged that certain <em>military stores</em> have been furnished to the
-insurgents at Grebgi by way of Ombla.... <em>The share taken by
-Austrian subjects in the late battles of the Douga Pass is notorious;
-it is now known that 179 Crevoscians were killed during the three
-days’ fighting; but, as far as I am aware, no measures have been
-taken to prevent a repetition of such violations of neutrality</em>....
-My own conviction is that had it not been for the money spent by
-Russia and by Dalmatian Panslavic Committees upon certain
-influential chiefs, <em>the insurrection would long since have collapsed</em>....
-If these considerations are correct, as I honestly believe them to be,
-it is clear that, as far as the Herzegovina is concerned, a great step
-in the suppression of the insurrection would be effected <em>if the
-Austrian Government would dissolve the Panslavic Committees,
-enforce a strict surveillance of the frontier, and would absolutely
-forbid and put down the export of arms and ammunition to
-Montenegro.</em>”<a name="FNanchor_84_84" id="FNanchor_84_84"></a><a href="#Footnote_84_84" class="fnanchor">84</a></p>
-
-<p>The facts stated in this important despatch need no addition, and
-would be only weakened by any commentary.</p>
-
-<p>Let us proceed with others. Consul Holmes, writing from Bosna
-Serai, on the 15th June 1876, to Lord Derby, says: “On the 6th inst.,
-the authorities at Mostar announced to the Baron Rodich (Governor
-of Dalmatia) the fact that 1800 cases of rifles and their cartridges
-were being landed at Cattaro for the Montenegrins. On the 9th,
-Baron Rodich thanked them for their information, and said he would
-order an enquiry into the matter and punish any illegality. Of course,
-the arms will all be at Cettinje before he commences....”<a name="FNanchor_85_85" id="FNanchor_85_85"></a><a href="#Footnote_85_85" class="fnanchor">85</a></p>
-
-<p>This is what Consul Holmes, who had resided fifteen years in the
-country, and who knew more of it than any foreigner alive (it was he
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">284</a></span>whom the English Government lent to Baron Calice at the Conference,
-on account of his special knowledge of the country, and who received
-the thanks of both Governments for his services), says: “To people
-residing in these countries, and who know the real state of parties,
-<em>and the true nature of the insurrection</em>, the idea of securing pacification
-by concessions to the insurgents appears simply absurd. In the
-first place, reforms and concessions cannot be executed until pacification
-is obtained, and in the next, for reasons which I have frequently
-explained to your Lordship, those who are in arms and who keep up
-the insurrection, <em>care nothing about them; they have other objects and
-other interests</em>.”<a name="FNanchor_86_86" id="FNanchor_86_86"></a><a href="#Footnote_86_86" class="fnanchor">86</a></p>
-
-<p>Such was Austria, that was at peace with Turkey, entertaining
-friendly relations with the Porte, and protesting in every tone of
-diplomatic expressions to every Cabinet in Europe her earnest and
-anxious desire for the pacification of the Turkish Provinces!</p></div>
-<hr />
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">285</a></span></p>
-
-<h2>APPENDIX C<br /><br />
-
-<small>BULGARIAN‐ATROCITIES</small></h2>
-
-<div class="blockquot">
-
-<p><span class="smcap">The</span> Slav Committees that had been for thirteen years “working
-up” the recalcitrant materials of rebellion in Bulgaria, were proceeding
-leisurely in their work when Count Andrassy stole a march upon
-them in the Herzegovina; but in spite of every effort on the part of
-Austria to precipitate a diplomatic crisis before the Bulgarian plot
-was ripe, the Slav Committees, whose venue was Bulgaria, caught
-him up before his work was completed. The head Slav Committee
-was at Moscow, and there were two central Committees at Kichenew
-and Bucharest. They had been established for about thirteen years,
-but although their activity had been intermittent, it was through their
-influence that the Bulgarian Church had been separated from the
-Greek Patriarchal, and that a Bulgarian School under Government
-patronage had been established at Odessa to form young Bulgarians
-into missionary propagandists of the Slav idea. When, however, the
-Herzegovina insurrection broke out, and matters were fast ripening on
-that side, a revival of energy at once manifested itself in the action
-of these Committees with reference to Bulgaria. As General
-Tchernagoff wrote in his paper, the <cite>Russki Mir</cite> (on 11th May 1876):
-“I chose the route by way of Kischenew and the Danube, <em>along
-the whole course of which</em>, commencing from the Russian frontier to
-the Servian boundary, <em>Committees were formed towards the end of last
-year</em> for organising the plans of the Bulgarians in their approaching
-struggle for independence. Commencing from Bolgrad (a Bulgarian
-colony that fell away from Russia and became incorporated with
-Roumania by virtue of the Treaty of Paris), I everywhere heard the
-same thing, which was to the effect that all had been done that was
-possible by the people for the impending struggle.... The movements
-of the insurgents are regulated by a fixed programme.”</p>
-
-<p>We have seen (p. 43) during Midhat Pasha’s Governorship of
-Bulgaria, how a raid over the frontier, following the usual tactics of
-exasperation, had endeavoured to excite a rising, which was promptly
-suppressed by the energy of the Vali. In the beginning of 1874
-unrest began to show itself again in the districts of Trianova, Kezanlic,
-and Zagra, but, warned by the effects of neglect in a recent instance,
-the authorities had all the leaders of the movement arrested. Thereupon
-General Ignatieff made such energetic representations to the
-Porte, that orders arrived, not only for the release of the imprisoned,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_286" id="Page_286">286</a></span>
-malcontents, but for the dismissal of all functionaries concerned in
-their arrest. The effect of this novel and original mode of dealing
-with an insurrection was soon apparent in the effervescence and excitement
-it caused among the Mussulman population throughout the
-Province. They saw rebel bands organising without disguise, and
-approaching their own hearths, the leaders of which were patronised
-by foreign consuls and supported by foreign embassies, whereas
-defensive measures on the part of their own natural leaders were
-discountenanced and punished.</p>
-
-<p>It was in this frame of mind of the Mussulman population of the
-Empire, that the troubles both at Salonica and in Bulgaria occurred.
-In October 1875, a local rising took place in the village of Eski Zagra.
-Mr Vice‐Consul Brophy writes to Sir H. Elliot:&mdash;“In October 1875
-everything was settled for a rising in Bulgaria, in eight or ten places
-simultaneously. Something occurred which made it advisable that the
-rising should be put off, and messengers were sent to all the centres,
-but the “put off” for Eski Zagra arrived twenty‐four hours late, and
-that town rose in the full conviction that it was being seconded by all
-the force of the insurgents. In fact, the <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">émeute</i>, revolt, rebellion,
-revolution, or whatever it was, of May last (1876) was to have come
-off in October 1875, but did not.”<a name="FNanchor_87_87" id="FNanchor_87_87"></a><a href="#Footnote_87_87" class="fnanchor">87</a></p>
-
-<p>The Committees were not ready. But the unrest continued, and
-when the Provincial Governors begged the Porte to send regular
-troops into the district, General Ignatieff dissuaded Mahmoud
-Nedim, the Grand Vizier, from doing so, on the ground that “the
-presence of regular troops would have the effect of still further
-increasing the excitement.”</p>
-
-<p>We will now allow Vice‐Consul Dupuis, writing on 7th August
-1876, to give an account to Lord Derby of the origin of the outbreak:
-“This was the condition of things when, on the 2nd of May, the insurrection
-organised and planned by the Revolutionary Committees,
-established during the last thirteen years in Bucharest and Moscow,
-suddenly exploded at Avrat Alan. The plan of operation of the
-revolutionists, assisted by the village priests and schoolmasters, was
-to destroy the railways and bridges throughout the vilayet, to set on
-fire Adrianople and Philippopolis, and to attack Tatar Bazardjik with
-5000 men, and seize upon the Government stores there.” An
-accident caused the premature explosion of the revolt. “A sergeant of
-Zaptiés, who had gone to Avrat Alan, either to collect taxes or to
-effect some arrests, was suddenly attacked by armed Bulgarians
-(who thought their plans had been betrayed), and had to fly for his
-life. Shortly after, troubles broke out at Otloukeuyi and Bellowa;
-at the same time, the inhabitants of several Bulgarian villages, it
-would appear, under the impression that the impending massacre
-was at hand, left their homes and fled to Otloukeuyi and Avrat Alan.</p>
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_287" id="Page_287">287</a></span></p>
-<p>The alarm then appears to have become general. The Christians
-were afraid that they would be massacred by the Mussulmans, while
-the latter were afraid that they were going to be exterminated by the
-Christians. The numerical strength of the insurgents was stated to
-be 15,000. The Mutassarifat of Philippopolis was at that time a
-Tatar Bazardjik. Troops were telegraphed for to the Governor‐General
-of Adrianople, who, it is said, replied that <em>as he had
-no military force at his disposal</em>, he thought the best plan
-would be to raise irregulars. On the 4th May, a meeting of some
-notables at Philippopolis was held, under the presidency of the
-Mollah, when the recommendation of the Governor‐General, for
-raising Nefer Ami (public soldiers) was approved of, and a decision
-to that effect was signed and forwarded to Adrianople. Orders were
-then immediately sent to different parts of the vilayet for enlisting
-irregulars or Bashi‐bazouks.”<a name="FNanchor_88_88" id="FNanchor_88_88"></a><a href="#Footnote_88_88" class="fnanchor">88</a> These Bashi‐bazouks attacked
-Peroushtitza Batak and Klissoura and Otloukeuyi, and there is no
-doubt that very great excesses were committed by them. But Mr
-Dupuis goes on to say: “It is said, without any attempt at concealment,
-that the Russian Vice‐Consul in Philippopolis is solely responsible for
-the sad disasters which have befallen Peroushtitza. In many instances,
-too, the villages were set on fire by the Bulgarians themselves in order
-to compel their inhabitants to take up arms. The village of Singerli,
-now a complete mass of ruins, was in the first instance set on fire by
-a priest. This man, in order to force the people to rise against the
-Government, rushed about the place, knife in hand, telling them that
-their hour of deliverance had arrived, and that Russian soldiers were
-at hand to aid them against the Turks. I am assured, on reliable
-and independent authority, that the Bulgarian insurrection was carefully
-and skilfully planned by men possessing knowledge and experience
-in military tactics from foreign parts. Had their plans succeeded,
-and if the Bulgarians had got the upper hand of the Turks, there is
-little doubt the existence of Turkey in Europe would have been
-endangered, and the Bulgarians would have committed far greater
-excesses than are laid to the charge of the Mussulmans, from the
-fact that the former had, from the commencement of the disturbance,
-<em>killed every Turk they came across, regardless as to age or sex, and by
-the practising upon them, in several instances, of unspeakable
-atrocities</em>. Atrocities have, undoubtedly, been committed by the
-Bulgarians as well as by the Turks. Thus at Carlowo, it was related
-to me, on good authority, that a Turkish boy had both his arms
-flayed to the elbows by the Bulgarians; while at Otloukeuyi, the
-Bulgarians massacred eighty Mussulmans, and cut up a child into
-pieces, and publicly offered the flesh for sale, and committed other
-unspeakable atrocities on females.”<a name="FNanchor_89_89" id="FNanchor_89_89"></a><a href="#Footnote_89_89" class="fnanchor">89</a></p>
-
-<p>As for the Russian Vice‐Consul at Philippopolis, Mr Gueroff,
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_288" id="Page_288">288</a></span>Vice‐Consul Dupuis says of him: “The news of the Russian Vice‐Consul
-at Philippopolis having been insulted, though repeated, is not
-generally confirmed. Some say, if he was not insulted, he is trying
-his best to provoke it by his conduct.”<a name="FNanchor_90_90" id="FNanchor_90_90"></a><a href="#Footnote_90_90" class="fnanchor">90</a></p>
-
-<p>Sir H. Elliot, on 11th August, writes to Lord Derby: “A letter
-from Mr Baring, received yesterday, contains these words: ‘There is
-not the slightest doubt that the Russian Consul at Philippopolis had
-a leading part in creating the late insurrection.’”<a name="FNanchor_91_91" id="FNanchor_91_91"></a><a href="#Footnote_91_91" class="fnanchor">91</a></p>
-
-<p>As to the menacing character of the insurrection, there is cumulative
-evidence to that effect. On 13th May, Vice‐Consul Brophy,
-writing to Sir H. Elliot, says: “I have the honour to express to your
-Excellency my belief that the Bulgarian insurrectionary movement,
-commenced in the Caza of Philippopolis, will not be confined to that
-district. I have some reason for thinking that the plans of the insurgents
-embrace six centres of revolt, most of them in the high
-Balkan (Kodga Balkan, Stari Planina), in each of which localities
-depôts of arms&mdash;rifles, revolvers, etc.&mdash;ammunition, and provisions
-are hidden.”<a name="FNanchor_92_92" id="FNanchor_92_92"></a><a href="#Footnote_92_92" class="fnanchor">92</a></p>
-
-<p>The cruelties practised by the insurgents on the Turks were also
-beyond all doubt. They were, moreover, in strict conformity with the
-practice and instructions of the insurgents in all similar risings.
-On 12th May, Mr Dupuis informs Sir H. Elliot: “The burning
-of Bellowa seems to have been attended with horrible cruelties
-to the small Turkish guard in charge of the place, which, being overpowered,
-was hacked to pieces by the Bulgarians. My informant
-adds that, shortly after this occurrence, a party of about a hundred
-and fifty well‐mounted and equipped insurgents, led by the priests,
-presented itself in the village, declaring, with crucifixes in hand, that
-that was the way to exterminate Islamism.”<a name="FNanchor_93_93" id="FNanchor_93_93"></a><a href="#Footnote_93_93" class="fnanchor">93</a> Mr Sandison, the first
-dragoman of the English Embassy, writing to Sir H. Elliot on 11th
-July 1876, says, <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">à propos</i> of these cruelties: “I may here quote the
-testimony of the artist employed by the <cite>Illustrated London News</cite>,
-who in his travels through Bulgaria came across the body of a Turk
-who had been impaled and roasted by Bulgarians. Such acts could
-not but lead to reprisals, and to the consequent destruction of many
-thousand lives, as well as of a large number of villages, amongst
-which must also be included a good many Mussulman ones.”<a name="FNanchor_94_94" id="FNanchor_94_94"></a><a href="#Footnote_94_94" class="fnanchor">94</a>
-Consul Reade reports from Rustchuk on 19th July (1876) that
-“Some Bulgarian insurgents one day seized two Mussulman women,
-whose breasts they cut off <em>and then put</em> them to death.”<a name="FNanchor_95_95" id="FNanchor_95_95"></a><a href="#Footnote_95_95" class="fnanchor">95</a></p>
-
-<p>Vice‐Consul Calvert, writing from Philippopolis on 29th August
-1876, says; “The Christian Commissioners, one of whom, Yovantcho
-Effendi, is himself a Bulgarian, state themselves to be satisfied that
-deeds of great atrocity on the part of the insurgents marked the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_289" id="Page_289">289</a></span>commencement of the rising in May last, and that <em>cruelties were
-designedly committed by the insurgents as being the means best calculated
-to bring on a general revolution in Bulgaria</em>, by rendering the
-situation of the Christians, however peaceably inclined, so intolerable
-under the indiscriminate retaliation which the governing race was
-sure to attempt, as to force them in self‐defence to rise. Among
-other instances of this Blacque Bey mentioned to me that the
-Christian inhabitants of a village near Tirnovo related to him, how,
-at the beginning of the revolt, the insurgents had seized a wealthy
-Turk of the locality, beloved by Christians and Moslems alike, for
-his justice and benevolence, had buried him up to the waist in the
-earth, and then stoned him to death.”<a name="FNanchor_96_96" id="FNanchor_96_96"></a><a href="#Footnote_96_96" class="fnanchor">96</a></p>
-
-<p>With reference to the invariable mode of procedure of the leaders
-of the insurrection for the very purpose of exciting reprisals, Sir H.
-Elliot, in a communication to Lord Derby, says: “The inhabitants
-of another village stated that at the beginning of the insurrection,
-they were told by <em>the priests and the schoolmasters</em> that the Turks
-were advancing, that they must leave this village or they would be
-killed by the Turks, and that those who objected were driven out by
-force. The Mussulmans who happened to be there were murdered;
-their number was differently estimated at twelve and thirty‐two; the
-village was then set on fire. The Mussulmans in the neighbourhood
-seeing part of the village in flames, went there and pillaged and burnt
-the remaining houses.”<a name="FNanchor_97_97" id="FNanchor_97_97"></a><a href="#Footnote_97_97" class="fnanchor">97</a> The revolutionary agents from the Slav
-Committees had, since the recrudescence of their activity in the
-winter, been working zealously among the Bulgarians. On 4th May
-Sir H. Elliot, in acquainting Lord Derby with the movement at
-Otloukeuyi, says: “It was known that revolutionary agents were
-working actively among the Bulgarians, and that arms and ammunition
-have latterly been introduced in considerable quantities.”<a name="FNanchor_98_98" id="FNanchor_98_98"></a><a href="#Footnote_98_98" class="fnanchor">98</a> They
-knew, too, pretty well what they were about and when to strike, so
-that reprisals could be most surely counted on. Consul Reade, from
-Rustchuk, informs (9th May) Sir H. Elliot: “I have also just heard
-of an event said to have occurred near Avrat Alan, which, if true, may
-bring on serious complications. It is said that a Circassian village in
-that vicinity has been burnt; if so, the Circassians, generally a lawless
-set, are sure to take their revenge, and this may severely tax the
-Government to put down, when once commenced.”<a name="FNanchor_99_99" id="FNanchor_99_99"></a><a href="#Footnote_99_99" class="fnanchor">99</a> Prophetic
-words indeed! The revolutionary agents of the Committees found
-this work difficult in the face of the repressive measures taken. On
-the 16th May 1876 Consul Reade reports from Rustchuk: “Many of
-the revolutionary Bulgarians in Wallachia are said to be entering this
-vilayet, and some have already been discovered and arrested.”<a name="FNanchor_100_100" id="FNanchor_100_100"></a><a href="#Footnote_100_100" class="fnanchor">100</a> Here,
-then, we have revolutionary agents coming from abroad and exciting the
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_290" id="Page_290">290</a></span>people already long worked upon by priests and schoolmasters brought
-up in Russia, to rise in rebellion and to commit every species of atrocity
-on the Mussulman population with the direct object of provoking them
-to reprisals, which could be exploited against them all over Europe.
-We have further the Consul of a friendly Power, one of the chief
-leaders of the insurrection, and the “Ambassador of the same friendly
-Power” at Constantinople, strongly counselling against the despatch
-of regular troops to districts where the Governor‐General urges the
-necessity of their presence, and when the Mussulman inhabitants, in
-their defence and under the impulse of panic and exaggerated fear
-of what was going to happen, without any regular force to protect
-them, arm irregular bands from any quarter they can procure them
-with, likely enough, not sufficient discrimination and examination as
-to their character, scenes are, no doubt, enacted, and atrocities committed,
-which every human being, be he Christian or Mahometan,
-would in cold blood deprecate and deplore.</p>
-
-<p>As Sir H. Elliot says: “An insurrection or civil war is everywhere
-accompanied by cruelties and abominable excesses, and this being
-tenfold the case in Oriental countries where people are divided into
-antagonistic creeds and races, the responsibility and sin of those who
-incite a peaceful province to rise becomes doubly heavy, and they
-now endeavour to throw them upon others.”<a name="FNanchor_101_101" id="FNanchor_101_101"></a><a href="#Footnote_101_101" class="fnanchor">101</a> Nobody outside
-Timbuctoo approves or condones cruelties, but the charge against
-the Ottoman authorities really amounts to their arming and employing
-irregular troops, Pomaks, Circassians, Gipsies, etc., over whom they
-could exercise very imperfect control. But as Mehemet Rushdi Pasha
-told the English Ambassador, “the emergency was so great as to render
-it indispensable at once to stamp the movement out by any means
-that were immediately available.”<a name="FNanchor_102_102" id="FNanchor_102_102"></a><a href="#Footnote_102_102" class="fnanchor">102</a> Mehemet Rushdi himself, it will be
-remembered, only came into office after those acts had been committed.
-He was consequently in no way responsible, neither he nor Midhat,
-either for their commission or for the events that led up to them.</p>
-
-<p>With reference to the <cite>Daily News</cite> article on Turkish atrocities,
-which started the agitation against Turkey in England, Sir H. Elliot,
-writing on the 25th July 1876, says: “I have reason to believe that
-the credulity of the correspondent of the <cite>Daily News</cite>, whose letters
-on the subject of the Bulgarian atrocities attracted so much attention
-in England, has been imposed upon by two Bulgarian relatives of one
-of the presumed ringleaders of the revolt, inhabiting Philippopolis.
-One of these was for a time editor of a Bulgarian journal in Constantinople,
-and it is evident that information derived from such a source
-can only be regarded as untrustworthy.”<a name="FNanchor_103_103" id="FNanchor_103_103"></a><a href="#Footnote_103_103" class="fnanchor">103</a></p>
-
-<p>As the very aim and purpose of the insurrection was to create
-excitement and provoke hatred of the Turk in Europe, it is no wonder if
-the most monstrous exaggerations passed current as peremptory truths.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_291" id="Page_291">291</a></span></p>
-
-<p>Sir H. Elliot, writing on 6th July, says: “The excesses committed in
-the suppression of the insurrection have unquestionably been very
-great, as was inevitable from the nature of the force which the Porte
-was, in the first emergency, obliged to employ, but it is equally certain
-that the details which have been given, coming almost exclusively
-from Russian and Bulgarian sources, are so <em>monstrously exaggerated</em>
-as to deprive them of much claim to much attention. Cases of
-revolting cruelty have been mentioned to me in such a circumstantial
-manner as to make it almost impossible to doubt this truth, but which
-proved, on investigation, to be entirely fictitious.... Turkish
-ministers deny that the cruelties have been on a scale at all approaching
-to what they are represented; they point out that the horrors
-committed on Turkish women and children are passed over in silence,
-and they plead that they had no alternative <em>but</em> to use the irregular
-force at their disposal to put down an unprovoked insurrection
-fomented from abroad, the authors of which are responsible for the
-sufferings which have been entailed upon both Christians and
-Mahometans.”<a name="FNanchor_104_104" id="FNanchor_104_104"></a><a href="#Footnote_104_104" class="fnanchor">104</a></p>
-
-<p>Some of the fictions invented were quite picturesque and dramatic.
-These fictions and legends were not confined to Bulgaria, and Canon
-Liddon and a Rev. Mr MacColl carried off the palm for ingenious
-credulity. On the 2nd October 1876, Sir H. Elliot telegraphs to
-Her Majesty’s Consul at Bosnia Serai: “Canon Liddon and a friend,
-who went to Servia by the Bosnian frontier, state that they saw
-examples of revolting cruelties practised by Turkish officers of the
-regular army, who have <em>impaled</em>, at all military stations along the
-frontier, men and women. Report as to truth of these statements.”
-On the 5th inst. the startled Consul sends the following reply:
-“Everything known here would make statement in your telegram
-of 2nd inst. perfectly incredible, <em>but</em> for the name of your Excellency’s
-informant. I will write of this by next post.”<a name="FNanchor_105_105" id="FNanchor_105_105"></a><a href="#Footnote_105_105" class="fnanchor">105</a> The statement of the
-distinguished ecclesiastic created a great sensation. It turned out,
-however, that he had obtained his information from passengers in a
-steam vessel on the Save, and that they had not travelled along the
-frontier at all, as Sir A. Buchanan, who first reported to Sir H. Elliot,
-had been led to believe. “The whole story, therefore,” adds Sir A.
-Buchanan, “probably resolves itself, as suggested by Mr Holmes, to
-heads or even bodies having been exposed on poles, as I have myself
-seen hanging in chains during the British Protectorate of Corfu.”<a name="FNanchor_106_106" id="FNanchor_106_106"></a><a href="#Footnote_106_106" class="fnanchor">106</a>
-Mr Holmes, in his report, after demonstrating the absurdity of the
-story, politely adds: “Now, if Canon Liddon states that he saw what
-he describes, of course I can say nothing to the contrary; but if he has
-only been assured of these atrocities, it is most certain that he has been
-grossly deceived, with a view to make use of his voice and influence
-as a means of increasing and confirming public opinion in England, in
-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_292" id="Page_292">292</a></span>the belief of the barbarous conduct attributed to the Turks, and in
-hostility to them.”<a name="FNanchor_107_107" id="FNanchor_107_107"></a><a href="#Footnote_107_107" class="fnanchor">107</a> These reverend gentlemen had evidently been the
-victims of, as Mr Holmes further says, “a monstrous joke,” and he
-proceeds to explain the matter. “After much reflection, however, the
-matter is, I think, as clear as possible. Near most Bosnian farm‐houses
-there are stakes, such as Mr MacColl describes, around which
-the haricot beans ... are fixed up to dry with something above them
-to keep off the birds.... At the time of Mr MacColl’s voyage down
-the Save, it is probable that most of the beans had been garnered, but
-a portion might have been left on one of the stakes which attracted his
-attention. This, on being pointed out to some practical joker amongst
-the officers of the steamboat, with its accidental likeness to a body,
-together, perhaps, with the previous conversation of the travellers,
-suggested the hoax, which, on seeing that it was seriously accepted,
-was kept up till the end of the journey.”<a name="FNanchor_108_108" id="FNanchor_108_108"></a><a href="#Footnote_108_108" class="fnanchor">108</a></p>
-
-<p>Another and most probable explanation of this astounding story
-was that what Canon Liddon and his friend really saw, “was a
-watchman who had mounted on his stake, probably to look at the
-steamer descending the Save.”<a name="FNanchor_109_109" id="FNanchor_109_109"></a><a href="#Footnote_109_109" class="fnanchor">109</a> Anybody may be mistaken, even
-distinguished ecclesiastics; but what, in such quasi‐sacred persons was
-scarcely to be expected, was the tenacity with which they stuck to
-the impalement theory, after it was exploded in the minds of all
-impartial persons. Even high dignitaries of the Church don’t like
-being laughed at.</p></div>
-
-<hr />
-
-<h2>FOOTNOTES:</h2>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">1</span></a> “History of the Ottoman Empire,” vol. ii. p. 356.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">2</span></a> “La Motraye,” La Haye, 1727, vol. i. pp. 383, 462.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">3</span></a> See the “Relation du Baile Garzoni,” of 1586.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_4"><span class="label">4</span></a> See Gervinus’ “Insurrection et Régéneration de la Grèce,” vol. i.
-p. 16.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">5</span></a> Pozzo di Borgo to Count Nesselrode, November 1828.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">6</span></a>
-<p class="center"><i>“The First Dragoman of the Russian Embassy to Mahmoud
-Nedim.</i><a name="FNanchor_A_7" id="FNanchor_A_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_A_7" class="fnanchor">A</a>
-</p>
-
-<p>
-“<span class="smcap">My Dear Highness</span>,&mdash;I have communicated the observations of
-your Highness to His Excellency the Ambassador, who has assured
-us in his reply that he will use his influence to arrest the Herzegovinian
-insurrection. No one desires more earnestly than ourselves the
-success of Your Highness’ projects.
-</p>
-<p>
-“Your Highness may give the necessary assurances to whom they
-may concern.” (1873).
-</p>
-<p>
-[Taken from a pamphlet called “Ussi Inkillab,” which was published
-at the beginning of the reign of Abdul Hamid&mdash;an interesting
-document in proving this fact.]</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_A_7" id="Footnote_A_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_A_7"><span class="label">A</span></a> <cite>Nineteenth Century</cite>, January 1903.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">7</span></a> See Appendix.&mdash;“Bulgarian Atrocities.”</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">8</span></a> See Appendix&mdash;“Bulgarian Atrocities.”</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">9</span></a> See Appendix.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">10</span></a> <cite>Nineteenth Century</cite>, February 1888.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_11"><span class="label">11</span></a> Boat.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_12"><span class="label">12</span></a> <cite>Nineteenth Century</cite>, January 1903.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_13"><span class="label">13</span></a> “Blue Book,” <cite>Turkey</cite>, 2, No. 105.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_14"><span class="label">14</span></a> <cite>Nineteenth Century</cite>, February 1888, p. 279.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">15</span></a> Although a man of this description, unfit for Parliament, was
-quite fitted to represent his Sovereign at one of the most important
-Courts of Europe.&mdash;<span class="smcap">Author.</span></p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">16</span></a> The Director‐General of official and private correspondence
-between the Palace and the Sublime Porte.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">17</span></a> Blue Book, <cite>Turkey</cite>, 2, 1877, No. 152.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">18</span></a> <cite>Nineteenth Century</cite>, January 1903.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">19</span></a> Blue Book, <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, No. 985.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_20"><span class="label">20</span></a> <cite>Times</cite>, 10th February 1877.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_21"><span class="label">21</span></a> Mr Blunt, H.B.M. Consul at Salonica, addressed the following
-despatch to Lord Derby:&mdash;
-</p>
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Salonica</span>, <i>10th February 1877</i>.</p>
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">My Lord</span>,</p>
-
-<p class="center2"><span class="gesperrt">* * * * *</span></p>
-
-<p>“The leading men with whom I have conversed, and the people
-in general here, manifest much surprise and some irritation at the
-sudden dismissal of Midhat Pasha from the Grand Vizierate, in
-whom they had full confidence that he would carry out reforms.
-</p>
-<p>
-“The prevailing impression here is, especially among the Turks,
-that the fall of this popular statesman has been prepared and effected
-by the Sultan’s immediate <i lang="fr" xml:lang="fr">entourage</i>.
-</p>
-<p>
-“In case there is any demonstration at Constantinople, in favour
-of Midhat Pasha, the popular feeling at Salonica would, I think,
-coincide with it.<a name="FNanchor_B_23" id="FNanchor_B_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_B_23" class="fnanchor">B</a>&mdash;I have, etc.,
-</p>
-
-<p class="right"><span class="smcap">“J. E. Blunt</span>.”</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_B_23" id="Footnote_B_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_B_23"><span class="label">B</span></a> Blue Book, <cite>Turkey</cite>, 15, 1877, No. 171.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_22"><span class="label">22</span></a> At the accession of Abdul Hamid, he was his favourite First
-Secretary, and was thereupon appointed Grand Vizier.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_23"><span class="label">23</span></a> He had been Grand Vizier in the time of Abdul Aziz, and ruined
-the Empire by his wretched and Russophil policy.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_24"><span class="label">24</span></a> “<i>Turkey. Constantinople, 11th May.</i>&mdash;The doubts I expressed in
-a recent despatch, concerning the veracity of the chief witnesses in
-the enquiry about the death of Abdul Aziz, are being confirmed,
-and the Sultan now hesitates about bringing the affair before a
-public tribunal. Several important personages, who cannot be
-suspected of complicity, declare openly that the raising of the
-question was the result of an intrigue, and at the Palace the opinion
-is gaining ground that the matter will terminate with the degradation
-and exile of the Sultan’s two brothers‐in‐law, and the temporary
-imprisonment of their supposed accomplices, without any formal
-trial. When the enquiry was first instituted, an old and devoted
-friend of the dynasty reminded the Sultan of an unsavoury Turkish
-saying, equivalent to our proverb about the wisdom of letting
-sleeping dogs lie, and His Majesty has now reason to regret that
-he did not follow his advice.”&mdash;<cite>Times</cite>, 12th May (p. 5, col. 3).</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_25"><span class="label">25</span></a> “Midhat Pasha, on taking refuge at the French Consulate, sent
-letters to all the other Consuls, requesting the protection of the
-Powers. The Consuls accordingly held a meeting, and decided to
-ask instructions from their respective Governments. The reason
-alleged by Midhat is that he is a victim of personal animosity, and
-that he is in danger of personal violence, but this ground of defence
-has been anticipated by the Imperial decision that the whole affair
-shall be submitted to the regular tribunal, the sittings of which will
-be public. His Majesty is evidently anxious that the whole matter
-should be thoroughly sifted, and for this purpose has appointed a
-sub‐commission to interrogate the native and foreign doctors who
-held the post‐mortem examination on the body of the late Sultan, as
-it has been rumoured that the medical report made at the time, is not
-quite in accordance with the testimony of certain witnesses recently
-examined. This procedure seems to remove effectually the danger
-of personal violence, which Midhat alleges as the reason for having
-put himself under foreign protection.”&mdash;<cite>Times</cite>, 19th May (p. 5,
-col. 4).</p>
-
-<p class="center"><cite>By Indo‐European Telegraph.</cite></p>
-
-<p>“<i>Constantinople, 18th May.</i>&mdash;On receiving instructions from his
-Ambassador, the French Consul at Smyrna requested Midhat Pasha
-to quit the Consulate, whereupon the latter proceeded to surrender
-himself to the Turkish Military Governor. A judicial enquiry will
-be commenced at Smyrna.”</p>
-
-<p class="tb">“<i>Turkey. Constantinople, 21st May.</i>&mdash;Letters from Smyrna give
-some details concerning the arrest of Midhat Pasha. Between one
-and two o’clock on Tuesday morning he was awoke by a bugle‐call.
-He discovered that troops were advancing under the command
-of Hilmi Pasha, accompanied by one of the Sultan’s aides‐de‐camp,
-who had recently arrived from Constantinople. He at once suspected
-the motive of the nocturnal visit, and as a small body of soldiers
-were entering the courtyard, he made his escape by a door in the
-wall of the harem garden, and reached safely the French Consulate.
-At an early hour the Consul assembled his colleagues, and Midhat
-Pasha declared to them that he placed himself under the protection
-of the Powers. Then followed the interchange of despatches
-with Constantinople and Paris, which I have described in a previous
-telegram. Midhat Pasha declared that he had no wish to leave
-the country, and was ready to proceed to Constantinople if he
-could obtain the necessary guarantees that he would be fairly
-tried, but Hilmi Pasha thought it prudent to take precautionary
-measures against a second flight by preventing small boats from
-approaching that part of the quay. Meanwhile, the French Consul
-had received stringent orders to withdraw the temporary protection
-which he had afforded, and accordingly, after having again called
-his colleagues together, he formally surrendered the fugitive to
-the Military. Next morning the Minister of Justice arrived in
-a special steamer to make a judicial enquiry. Midhat Pasha
-is being carefully guarded in a room in the barracks.”&mdash;<cite>Times</cite>,
-23rd May 1881 (p. 7, col. 2).</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_26"><span class="label">26</span></a> The Sheik‐ul‐Islam Haïroullah Effendi, and the two brothers‐in‐law
-of Abdul Hamid&mdash;Damad Mahmoud Djelaleddin and Damad
-Nouri Pashas.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_27"><span class="label">27</span></a> Who had killed the Ministers in Midhat Pasha’s house in 1876.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_28"><span class="label">28</span></a> <cite>Times</cite>, 5th June 1882, page 8, col. 2.&mdash;“Constantinople, 3rd June.
-According to a despatch from Djeddah, the Dragoman of the British
-Consulate at that place has gone to Mecca, the bearer of a letter from
-the British Government to the Grand Shereef, expressing the friendly
-sentiments of England towards him, and asking for news of Midhat
-Pasha.
-</p>
-<p>
-“The Grand Shereef, in reply, is stated to have assured the Dragoman
-that Midhat Pasha was in no danger of any kind. This step on
-the part of England has produced considerable sensation among the
-Arabs, who continue to attribute to the British Government designs of
-gaining ground and influence in Arabia.”</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_29"><span class="label">29</span></a> Afterwards General of Division with title of Pasha, and transferred
-from Adrianople to Yemen.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_30"><span class="label">30</span></a> About midnight European time.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_31_31" id="Footnote_31_31"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_31"><span class="label">31</span></a> The following is a list of the officers and men who assassinated
-Midhat, 29th Redjeb, 1301 of the Hegira, or 12th May 1883.</p>
-
-<table summary="murderers" border="0"><tr>
-<td class="tdl" colspan="2">Captain</td><td class="tdl">Ibrahim</td><td class="tdl">Circassian.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl" colspan="2">Non‐Commissioned&nbsp;Officer</td><td class="tdl">Lieutenant Nouri</td><td class="tdl">Native of Coumla.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc" colspan="2">Soldiers</td><td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td><td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">1st</td><td class="tdl">Company of Foot</td><td class="tdl padr1">The&nbsp;Sergeant&nbsp;Ahmed</td><td class="tdl">Native of Adremid.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">1st</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Coundirédji&nbsp;Ismail</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Yozgad.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">2nd</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Ahmed</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Kutahia.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">2nd</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Mehemet</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Kutahia.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">2nd</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Rédjeb</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Kumuljina.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">4th</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Osman</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Kara&nbsp;Hissar.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">2nd</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Berber Ismail<a name="FNanchor_C_34" id="FNanchor_C_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_C_34" class="fnanchor">C</a></td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Adrianople.</td>
-</tr></table>
-
-<p>The following persons were commissioned to deal with Mahmoud Pasha.</p>
-<table summary="Mahmoud Pasha" border="0"><tr>
-<td class="tdl" colspan="2">Non‐Commissioned&nbsp;Officer</td><td class="tdl">Lieutenant Memiche</td><td class="tdl">Native of Sparta.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl" colspan="2">Non‐Commissioned Officer</td><td class="tdl">Lieutenant Mehemet</td><td class="tdl">Eudemiche.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdc" colspan="2">Soldiers</td><td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td><td class="tdl">&nbsp;</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">2nd</td><td class="tdl">Company of Foot</td><td class="tdl">The Sergeant Hassan</td><td class="tdl">Native&nbsp;of&nbsp;Kutahia.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">2nd</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl padr1">The&nbsp;Sergeant&nbsp;Suleiman</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Kara Hissar.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">4th</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Corporal Mehemet</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Antalia.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">1st</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Osman Baltadji</td><td class="tdl padr1"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Kara&nbsp;Hissar.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">1st</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Ahmed</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Tchoroum.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">1st</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Ali (Roumelian)</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Samanli‐Kieuï.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">4th</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Berber Mustapha</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Dimétoka.</td>
-</tr><tr>
-<td class="tdl">4th</td><td class="tdc padr2">”</td><td class="tdl">Ali</td><td class="tdl"><span class="h">xxx</span>”<span class="h">xxxx</span>Zile.</td>
-</tr></table></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_C_34" id="Footnote_C_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_C_34"><span class="label">C</span></a> These soldiers belong to the conscription of 1296 S.T. except the one who belongs to 1300 S.T.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_32_32" id="Footnote_32_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_32"><span class="label">32</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 422.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_33_33" id="Footnote_33_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_33"><span class="label">33</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1877.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_34_34" id="Footnote_34_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_34"><span class="label">34</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, Nos. 529 and 530.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_35_35" id="Footnote_35_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_35"><span class="label">35</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 1.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_36_36" id="Footnote_36_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_36"><span class="label">36</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, Incl. No. 554.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_37_37" id="Footnote_37_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_37"><span class="label">37</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 559.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_38_38" id="Footnote_38_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_38"><span class="label">38</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 452.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_39_39" id="Footnote_39_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_39"><span class="label">39</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, Incl. No. 479.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_40_40" id="Footnote_40_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_40"><span class="label">40</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, No. 452.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_41_41" id="Footnote_41_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_41"><span class="label">41</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 197.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_42_42" id="Footnote_42_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_42"><span class="label">42</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 1, 1877, No. 325.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_43_43" id="Footnote_43_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43_43"><span class="label">43</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 324</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_44_44" id="Footnote_44_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44_44"><span class="label">44</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 1, 1877, No. 564.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_45_45" id="Footnote_45_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45_45"><span class="label">45</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, Nos. 470 and 498.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_46_46" id="Footnote_46_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46_46"><span class="label">46</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 508.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_47_47" id="Footnote_47_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47_47"><span class="label">47</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, No. 516.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_48_48" id="Footnote_48_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48_48"><span class="label">48</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 540.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_49_49" id="Footnote_49_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49_49"><span class="label">49</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 1, 1877, No. 584.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_50_50" id="Footnote_50_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50_50"><span class="label">50</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 1, 1877, No. 612.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_51_51" id="Footnote_51_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51_51"><span class="label">51</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, No. 952.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_52_52" id="Footnote_52_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52_52"><span class="label">52</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, No. 986.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_53_53" id="Footnote_53_53"></a><a href="#FNanchor_53_53"><span class="label">53</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 952.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_54_54" id="Footnote_54_54"></a><a href="#FNanchor_54_54"><span class="label">54</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 950.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_55_55" id="Footnote_55_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55_55"><span class="label">55</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 950.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_56_56" id="Footnote_56_56"></a><a href="#FNanchor_56_56"><span class="label">56</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, Nos. 166 and 239.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_57_57" id="Footnote_57_57"></a><a href="#FNanchor_57_57"><span class="label">57</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 23.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_58_58" id="Footnote_58_58"></a><a href="#FNanchor_58_58"><span class="label">58</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 1, No. 544.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_59_59" id="Footnote_59_59"></a><a href="#FNanchor_59_59"><span class="label">59</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, Nos. 459 and 517; and <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, Nos. 551
-and 898; and <cite>Turkey</cite>, 2, 1877, No. 27.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_60_60" id="Footnote_60_60"></a><a href="#FNanchor_60_60"><span class="label">60</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 1, 1877, Nos. 528, 541, 551, and 552.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_61_61" id="Footnote_61_61"></a><a href="#FNanchor_61_61"><span class="label">61</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 1, 1877, No. 52.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_62_62" id="Footnote_62_62"></a><a href="#FNanchor_62_62"><span class="label">62</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, No. 718.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_63_63" id="Footnote_63_63"></a><a href="#FNanchor_63_63"><span class="label">63</span></a> Blue Book, <cite>Turkey</cite> 2, 1876, No. 1.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_64_64" id="Footnote_64_64"></a><a href="#FNanchor_64_64"><span class="label">64</span></a> Blue Book, No. 2.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_65_65" id="Footnote_65_65"></a><a href="#FNanchor_65_65"><span class="label">65</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 32.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_66_66" id="Footnote_66_66"></a><a href="#FNanchor_66_66"><span class="label">66</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 2, 1876, No. 16.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_67_67" id="Footnote_67_67"></a><a href="#FNanchor_67_67"><span class="label">67</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 47.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_68_68" id="Footnote_68_68"></a><a href="#FNanchor_68_68"><span class="label">68</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 2, 1876, No. 70.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_69_69" id="Footnote_69_69"></a><a href="#FNanchor_69_69"><span class="label">69</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 71.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_70_70" id="Footnote_70_70"></a><a href="#FNanchor_70_70"><span class="label">70</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, No. 63.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_71_71" id="Footnote_71_71"></a><a href="#FNanchor_71_71"><span class="label">71</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, No. 6.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_72_72" id="Footnote_72_72"></a><a href="#FNanchor_72_72"><span class="label">72</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 11.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_73_73" id="Footnote_73_73"></a><a href="#FNanchor_73_73"><span class="label">73</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 44.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_74_74" id="Footnote_74_74"></a><a href="#FNanchor_74_74"><span class="label">74</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 121.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_75_75" id="Footnote_75_75"></a><a href="#FNanchor_75_75"><span class="label">75</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 128.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_76_76" id="Footnote_76_76"></a><a href="#FNanchor_76_76"><span class="label">76</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 130.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_77_77" id="Footnote_77_77"></a><a href="#FNanchor_77_77"><span class="label">77</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 195.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_78_78" id="Footnote_78_78"></a><a href="#FNanchor_78_78"><span class="label">78</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 221.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_79_79" id="Footnote_79_79"></a><a href="#FNanchor_79_79"><span class="label">79</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 248.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_80_80" id="Footnote_80_80"></a><a href="#FNanchor_80_80"><span class="label">80</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, Incl. No. 313. (Lord Odo Russell pronounces this
-document authentic. 3rd July 1876, No. 363.)</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_81_81" id="Footnote_81_81"></a><a href="#FNanchor_81_81"><span class="label">81</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 185.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_82_82" id="Footnote_82_82"></a><a href="#FNanchor_82_82"><span class="label">82</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 259.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_83_83" id="Footnote_83_83"></a><a href="#FNanchor_83_83"><span class="label">83</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 51, Incl.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_84_84" id="Footnote_84_84"></a><a href="#FNanchor_84_84"><span class="label">84</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 479.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_85_85" id="Footnote_85_85"></a><a href="#FNanchor_85_85"><span class="label">85</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 491.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_86_86" id="Footnote_86_86"></a><a href="#FNanchor_86_86"><span class="label">86</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 491.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_87_87" id="Footnote_87_87"></a><a href="#FNanchor_87_87"><span class="label">87</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, No. 674 Incl.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_88_88" id="Footnote_88_88"></a><a href="#FNanchor_88_88"><span class="label">88</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1877, No. 57 Incl.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_89_89" id="Footnote_89_89"></a><a href="#FNanchor_89_89"><span class="label">89</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_90_90" id="Footnote_90_90"></a><a href="#FNanchor_90_90"><span class="label">90</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 343, Incl.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_91_91" id="Footnote_91_91"></a><a href="#FNanchor_91_91"><span class="label">91</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 1, 1877, No. 24.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_92_92" id="Footnote_92_92"></a><a href="#FNanchor_92_92"><span class="label">92</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, Incl. 4 in 289.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_93_93" id="Footnote_93_93"></a><a href="#FNanchor_93_93"><span class="label">93</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 289, Incl.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_94_94" id="Footnote_94_94"></a><a href="#FNanchor_94_94"><span class="label">94</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 5, 1876, Incl. 1 in No. 18.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_95_95" id="Footnote_95_95"></a><a href="#FNanchor_95_95"><span class="label">95</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 5, 1876, Incl. 2 in No. 21.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_96_96" id="Footnote_96_96"></a><a href="#FNanchor_96_96"><span class="label">96</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, Incl. in No. 222.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_97_97" id="Footnote_97_97"></a><a href="#FNanchor_97_97"><span class="label">97</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 5, 1876, No. 22.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_98_98" id="Footnote_98_98"></a><a href="#FNanchor_98_98"><span class="label">98</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 252.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_99_99" id="Footnote_99_99"></a><a href="#FNanchor_99_99"><span class="label">99</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 273, Incl.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_100_100" id="Footnote_100_100"></a><a href="#FNanchor_100_100"><span class="label">100</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No. 315, Incl.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_101_101" id="Footnote_101_101"></a><a href="#FNanchor_101_101"><span class="label">101</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 1, 1877, No. 221.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_102_102" id="Footnote_102_102"></a><a href="#FNanchor_102_102"><span class="label">102</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 3, 1876, No 513.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_103_103" id="Footnote_103_103"></a><a href="#FNanchor_103_103"><span class="label">103</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 5, 1876, No. 24.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_104_104" id="Footnote_104_104"></a><a href="#FNanchor_104_104"><span class="label">104</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, 3, 1876, No. 538.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_105_105" id="Footnote_105_105"></a><a href="#FNanchor_105_105"><span class="label">105</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 1, 1877, No. 539.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_106_106" id="Footnote_106_106"></a><a href="#FNanchor_106_106"><span class="label">106</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 686.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_107_107" id="Footnote_107_107"></a><a href="#FNanchor_107_107"><span class="label">107</span></a> <cite>Turkey</cite>, Incl. in No. 687.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_108_108" id="Footnote_108_108"></a><a href="#FNanchor_108_108"><span class="label">108</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, Incl. in No. 961.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a name="Footnote_109_109" id="Footnote_109_109"></a><a href="#FNanchor_109_109"><span class="label">109</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i>, 2, 1877, Incl. in No. 179.</p></div>
-
-<hr />
-<p class="center"><small>
-PRINTED AT THE EDINBURGH PRESS, 9 AND 11 YOUNG STREET.</small>
-</p>
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-<pre>
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of
-his services, political reforms, bani, by Ali Haydar Midhat
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE LIFE OF MIDHAT PASHA ***
-
-***** This file should be named 51243-h.htm or 51243-h.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/5/1/2/4/51243/
-
-Produced by Turgut Dincer and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images generously made available by The
-Internet Archive)
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
-specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
-eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
-for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
-performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
-away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
-not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
-trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country outside the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
- are located before using this ebook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
-Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
-mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
-volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
-locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
-Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
-date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
-official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
-
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-
-
-
-</pre>
-
-</body>
-</html>