summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/44949-8.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '44949-8.txt')
-rw-r--r--44949-8.txt4772
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 4772 deletions
diff --git a/44949-8.txt b/44949-8.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 7ae6083..0000000
--- a/44949-8.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,4772 +0,0 @@
-Project Gutenberg's James Frederick Ferrier, by Elizabeth Sanderson Haldane
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-Title: James Frederick Ferrier
-
-Author: Elizabeth Sanderson Haldane
-
-Illustrator: Joseph Brown
-
-Release Date: February 17, 2014 [EBook #44949]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK JAMES FREDERICK FERRIER ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by sp1nd and the Online Distributed Proofreading
-Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from
-images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber's Note: Minor typographical errors have been corrected
-without note. Irregularities and inconsistencies in the text have
-been retained as printed. Words printed in italics are noted with
-underscores: _italics_.
-
-
-
-
-JAMES FREDERICK FERRIER
-
-
-FAMOUS SCOTS SERIES
-
-
-_The following Volumes are now ready_--
-
- THOMAS CARLYLE. By HECTOR C. MACPHERSON
- ALLAN RAMSAY. By OLIPHANT SMEATON
- HUGH MILLER. By W. KEITH LEASK
- JOHN KNOX. By A. TAYLOR INNES
- ROBERT BURNS. By GABRIEL SETOUN
- THE BALLADISTS. By JOHN GEDDIE
- RICHARD CAMERON. By Professor HERKLESS
- SIR JAMES Y. SIMPSON. By EVE BLANTYRE SIMPSON
- THOMAS CHALMERS. By Professor W. GARDEN BLAIKIE
- JAMES BOSWELL. By W. KEITH LEASK
- TOBIAS SMOLLETT. By OLIPHANT SMEATON
- FLETCHER OF SALTOUN. By G. W. T. OMOND
- THE BLACKWOOD GROUP. By SIR GEORGE DOUGLAS
- NORMAN MACLEOD. By JOHN WELLWOOD
- SIR WALTER SCOTT. By Professor SAINTSBURY
- KIRKCALDY OF GRANGE. By LOUIS A. BARBÉ
- ROBERT FERGUSSON. By A. B. GROSART
- JAMES THOMSON. By WILLIAM BAYNE
- MUNGO PARK. By T. BANKS MACLACHLAN
- DAVID HUME. By Professor CALDERWOOD
- WILLIAM DUNBAR. By OLIPHANT SMEATON
- SIR WILLIAM WALLACE. By Professor MURISON
- ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON. By MARGARET MOYES BLACK
- THOMAS REID. By Professor CAMPBELL FRASER
- POLLOK and AYTOUN. By ROSALINE MASSON
- ADAM SMITH. By HECTOR C. MACPHERSON
- ANDREW MELVILLE. By WILLIAM MORRISON
- JAMES FREDERICK FERRIER. By E. S. HALDANE
-
-
-
-
-JAMES FREDERICK FERRIER
-
-
-BY
-
-E. S. HALDANE
-
-
-FAMOUS SCOTS SERIES
-
-PUBLISHED BY OLIPHANT ANDERSON & FERRIER
-EDINBURGH AND LONDON
-
-
-The designs and ornaments of this volume are by Mr. Joseph Brown, and
-the printing from the press of Morrison & Gibb Limited, Edinburgh.
-
-1899.
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS
-
-
- PAGE
-
-INTRODUCTION 7
-
-
-CHAPTER I
-
-EARLY LIFE 11
-
-
-CHAPTER II
-
-WANDERJAHRE--SOCIAL LIFE IN SCOTLAND--BEGINNING OF
-HIS LITERARY WORK 27
-
-
-CHAPTER III
-
-PHILOSOPHY BEFORE FERRIER'S DAY 41
-
-
-CHAPTER IV
-
-'FIERCE WARRES AND FAITHFUL LOVES' 56
-
-
-CHAPTER V
-
-DEVELOPMENT OF 'SCOTTISH PHILOSOPHY, THE OLD AND THE
-NEW'--FERRIER AS A CORRESPONDENT 72
-
-
-CHAPTER VI
-
-FERRIER'S SYSTEM OF PHILOSOPHY--HIS PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS 88
-
-
-CHAPTER VII
-
-THE COLERIDGE PLAGIARISM--MISCELLANEOUS LITERARY WORK 106
-
-
-CHAPTER VIII
-
-PROFESSORIAL LIFE 122
-
-
-CHAPTER IX
-
-LIFE AT ST. ANDREWS 138
-
-
-CHAPTER X
-
-LAST DAYS 152
-
-
-
-
-JAMES FREDERICK FERRIER
-
-
-
-
-INTRODUCTION
-
-
-Mr. Oliphant Smeaton has asked me to write a few words of preface to
-this little book. If I try, it is only because I am old enough to have
-had the privilege of knowing some of those who were most closely
-associated with Ferrier.
-
-When I sat at the feet of Professor Campbell Fraser in the Metaphysics
-classroom at Edinburgh in 1875, Ferrier's writings were being much read
-by us students. The influence of Sir William Hamilton was fast
-crumbling in the minds of young men who felt rather than saw that much
-lay beyond it. We were still engrossed with the controversy, waged in
-books which now, alas! sell for a tenth of their former price, about
-the Conditioned and the Unconditioned. We still worked at Reid,
-Hamilton, and Mansel. But the attacks of Mill on the one side, and of
-Ferrier and Dr. Stirling on the other, were slowly but surely
-withdrawing our interest. Ferrier had pointed out a path which seemed
-to lead us in the direction of Germany if we would escape from Mill,
-and Stirling was urging us in the same sense. It was not merely that
-Ferrier had written books. He had died more than ten years earlier, but
-his personality was still a living influence. Echoes of his words came
-to us through Grant and Sellar. Outside the University, men like
-Blackwood and Makgill made us feel what a power he had been. But that
-was not all for at least some of us. Mrs. Ferrier had removed to
-Edinburgh--and I endorse all that my sister says of her rare quality.
-She lived in a house in Torphichen Street, which was the resort of
-those attracted, not only by the memory of her husband, but by her own
-great gifts. She was an old lady and an invalid. But though she could
-not move from her chair, paralysis had not dimmed her mental powers.
-She was a true daughter of 'Christopher North.' I doubt whether I have
-seen her rival in quickness, her superior I never saw. She could talk
-admirably to those sitting near her, and yet follow and join in the
-conversation of another group at the end of the room. She could adapt
-herself to everyone--to the shy and awkward student of eighteen, who
-like myself was too much in awe of her to do more unhelped than answer,
-and to the distinguished men of letters who came from every quarter
-attracted by her reputation for brilliance. The words of no one could
-be more incisive, the words of no one were habitually more kind than
-hers. She had known everybody. She forgot nobody. In those days the
-relation between Literature and the Parliament House, if less close
-than it had been, was more apparent than it is to-day, and
-distinguished Scottish judges and advocates mingled in the afternoon in
-the drawing-room, where she sat in a great arm-chair, with such men as
-Sellar and Stevenson and Grant and Shairp and Tulloch. But her
-personality was the supreme bond.
-
-Those days are over, and with them has passed away much of what
-stimulated one to read in the _Institutes_ or the _Philosophical
-Remains_. But for the historian of British philosophy Ferrier
-continues as a prominent figure. He it was who first did, what Stirling
-and Green did again at a stage later on--make a serious appeal to
-thoughtful people to follow no longer the shallow rivulets down which
-the teaching of the great German thinkers had trickled to them, but to
-seek the sources. If as a guide to those sources we do not look on him
-to-day as adequate, we are not the less under a deep obligation to him
-for having been the pioneer of later guides. What Ferrier wrote about
-forty years ago has now become readily accessible, and what has been
-got by going there is in process of rapid and complete assimilation.
-The opinions which were in 1856 regarded by the authorities of the Free
-and United Presbyterian Churches as disqualifying Ferrier for the
-opportunity of influencing the mind of the youth of Edinburgh, from the
-Chair of Logic and Metaphysics in succession to Sir William Hamilton,
-are regarded by the present generation of Presbyterians as the main
-reliable bulwark against the attacks of unbelievers. If one may judge
-by the essays in the recent volume called _Lux Mundi_, the same
-phenomenon displays itself among the young High Church party in
-England. The Time-Spirit is fond of revenges.
-
-But even for others than the historians of the movement of Thought the
-books of Ferrier remain attractive. There is about them a certain
-atmosphere in which everything seems alive and fresh. Their author was
-no Dryasdust. He was a living human being, troubled as we are troubled,
-and interested in the things which interest us. He spoke to us, not
-from the skies, but from among a crowd of his fellow human beings, and
-we feel that he was one of ourselves. As such it is good that a
-memorial of him should be placed where it may easily be seen.
-
-R. B. HALDANE.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER I
-
-EARLY LIFE
-
-
-It may be a truism, but it is none the less a fact, that it is not
-always he of whom the world hears most who influences most deeply the
-thought of the age in which he lives. The name of James Frederick
-Ferrier is little heard of beyond the comparatively small circle of
-philosophic thinkers who reverence his memory and do their best to keep
-it green: to others it is a name of little import--one among a
-multitude at a time when Scotland had many sons rising up to call her
-blessed, and not perhaps one of the most notable of these. And yet,
-could we but estimate the value of work accomplished in the higher
-sphere of thought as we estimate it in the other regions of practical
-work--an impossibility, of course--we might be disposed to modify our
-views, and accord our praises in very different quarters from those in
-which they are usually bestowed.
-
-James Ferrier wrote no popular books; he came before the public
-comparatively little; he made no effort to reconcile religion with
-philosophy on the one hand, or to propound theories startling in their
-unorthodoxy on the other. And still we may claim for him a place--and
-an honourable place--amongst the other Famous Scots, for the simple
-reason that after a long century of wearisome reiteration of tiresome
-platitudes--platitudes which had lost their original meaning even to
-the utterers of them, and which had become misleading to those who
-heard and thought they understood--Ferrier had the courage to strike
-out new lines for himself, to look abroad for new inspiration, and to
-hand on these inspirations to those who could work them into a truly
-national philosophy.
-
-In Scotland, where, in spite of politics, traditions are honoured to a
-degree unknown to most other countries, family and family associations
-count for much; and in these James Ferrier was rich. His father was a
-Writer to the Signet, John Ferrier by name, whose sister was the famous
-Scottish novelist, Susan Ferrier, authoress of _The Inheritance_,
-_Destiny_, and _Marriage_. Susan Ferrier did for high life in Scotland
-what Gait achieved for the humbler ranks of society, and attained to
-considerable eminence in the line of fiction which she adopted. Her
-works are still largely read, have recently been republished, and in
-their day were greatly admired by no less an authority than Sir Walter
-Scott, himself a personal friend of the authoress.[1] Ferrier's
-grandfather, James Ferrier, also a Writer to the Signet, was a man of
-great energy of character. He acted in a business capacity for many
-years both to the Duke of Argyle of the time and to various branches of
-the Clan Campbell: it was, indeed, through the influence of the Duke
-that he obtained the appointment which he held of Principal Clerk of
-Session. James Ferrier, like his daughter, was on terms of intimate
-friendship with Sir Walter Scott, with whom he likewise was a colleague
-in office. Scott alludes to him in his Journal as 'Uncle Adam,' the
-name of a character in Miss Ferrier's _Inheritance_, drawn, as she
-herself acknowledges, from her father. He died in 1829, at which time
-Scott writes of him: 'Honest old Mr. Ferrier is dead, at extreme old
-age. I confess I should not like to live so long. He was a man with
-strong passions and strong prejudices, but with generous and manly
-sentiments at the same time.' James Ferrier's wife, Miss Coutts, was
-remarkable for her beauty: a large family was born to her, the eldest
-son of whom was James Frederick Ferrier's father. Young Ferrier, the
-subject of this sketch, used frequently to dine with his grandfather at
-his house in Morningside, where Susan Ferrier acted in the capacity of
-hostess; and it is easy to imagine the bright talk which would take
-place on these occasions, and the impression which must have been made
-upon the lad, both then and after he attained to manhood; for Miss
-Ferrier survived until 1854. In later life, indeed, her wit was said to
-be somewhat caustic, and she was possibly dreaded by her younger
-friends and relatives as much as she was respected; but this, to do her
-justice, was partly owing to infirmities. She was at anyrate keenly
-interested in the fortunes of her nephew, to whom she was in the habit
-of alluding as 'the last of the metaphysicians'--scarcely, perhaps, a
-very happy title for one who was somewhat of an iconoclast, and began a
-new era rather than concluded an old.
-
- [1] In a _Life of Susan Ferrier_, lately published, an
- account of the family is given which was written by Miss
- Ferrier, for her nephew, the subject of our memoir.
-
-James Frederick Ferrier's mother, Margaret Wilson, was a sister of
-Professor John Wilson--the 'Christopher North' of immortal memory,
-whose daughter he was afterwards to marry. Margaret Ferrier was a woman
-of striking personal beauty. Her features were perfect in their
-symmetry, as is shown in a lovely miniature, painted by Saunders, a
-well-known miniature painter of the day, now in the possession of
-Professor Ferrier's son, her grandson. Many of these personal charms
-descended to James Ferrier, whose well-cut features bore considerable
-resemblance to his mother's. And his close connection with the Wilson
-family had the result of bringing the young man into association with
-whatever was best in literature and art. While yet a boy, we are told,
-he sat upon Sir Walter's knee; the Ettrick Shepherd had told him tales
-and recited Border ballads; while Lockhart took the trouble to draw
-pictures, as he only could, to amuse the child.
-
-In surroundings such as these James Frederick Ferrier was born on the
-16th day of June 1808, his birthplace being Heriot Row, in the new town
-of Edinburgh--a street which has been made historic to us by the
-recollections of another child who lived there long years afterwards,
-and who left the grey city of his birth to die far off in an island in
-the Pacific. But of Ferrier's child-life we know nothing: whether he
-played at 'tig' or 'shinty' with the children in the adjoining gardens,
-or climbed Arthur's Seat, or tried to scale the 'Cats' Nick' in the
-Salisbury Crags close by; or whether he was a grave boy, 'holding at'
-his lessons, or reading other books that interested him, in preference
-to his play. Ferrier did not dwell on these things or talk much of his
-youth; or if he did so, his words have been forgotten. What we do
-know are the barest facts: that his second name was given him in
-consideration of his father's friendship with Lord Frederick Campbell,
-Lord Clerk Register of Scotland; that his first name, as is usual in
-Scotland for an elder son, was his paternal grandfather's; and that he
-was sent to live with the Rev. Dr. Duncan, the parish minister of
-Ruthwell, in Dumfriesshire, to receive his early education. Dr. Duncan
-of Ruthwell was a man of considerable ability and energy of character,
-though not famous in any special sphere of learning. He is well known,
-however, in the south of Scotland as the originator of Savings Banks
-there, and his works on the Seasons bear evidence of an interest in the
-natural world. At anyrate the time passed in Dumfriesshire would appear
-to have left pleasant recollections; for when Ferrier in later life
-alluded to it, it was with every indication of gratitude for the
-instruction which he received. He kept up his friendship with the sons
-of his instructor as years went on, and always expressed himself as
-deeply attached to the place where a happy childhood had been passed.
-Nor was learning apparently neglected, for Ferrier began his Latin
-studies at Ruthwell, and there first learned--an unusual lesson for so
-young a boy--to delight in the reading of the Latin poets, and of
-Virgil and Ovid in particular. After leaving Ruthwell, he attended the
-High School of Edinburgh, the great Grammar School of the metropolis,
-which was, however, soon to have a rival in another day school set up
-in the western part of the rapidly growing town; and then he was sent
-to school at Greenwich, where he was placed under the care of Dr.
-Burney, a nephew of the famous Fanny Burney, afterwards Madame
-d'Arblay. From school, as the manner of the time was, the boy passed to
-the University of Edinburgh at the age of seventeen,--older really than
-was customary in his day,--and here he remained for the two sessions
-1825-26 and 1826-27, or until he was old enough to matriculate at
-Oxford. At Edinburgh, Ferrier distinguished himself in the class of
-Moral Philosophy, and carried off the prize of the year for a poem
-which was looked upon as giving promise of literary power afterwards
-fulfilled. His knowledge of Latin and Greek were considered good (the
-standard might not have been very high), but in mathematics he was
-nowhere. At Oxford he was entered in 1828 as a 'gentleman-commoner' at
-Magdalen College, the College of his future father-in-law, John Wilson.
-A gentleman-commoner of Magdalen in the earlier half of the century is
-not suggestive of severe mental exercise,[2] and from the very little
-one can gather from tradition--for contemporaries and friends have
-naturally passed away--James Ferrier was no exception to the common
-rule. That he rode is very clear; the College was an expensive one,
-and he was probably inclined to be extravagant. Tradition speaks of
-his pelting the deer in Magdalen Park with eggs; but as to further
-distinction in more intellectual lines, record does not tell. In this
-respect he presents a contrast to his predecessor at Oxford, and friend
-of later days, Sir William Hamilton, whose monumental learning created
-him a reputation while still an undergraduate. Sir Roundell Palmer,
-afterwards Lord Selborne, was a contemporary of Ferrier's at Oxford;
-Sheriff Campbell Smith was at the bar of the House of Lords acting as
-Palmer's junior the day after Ferrier's death, and Sir Roundell told
-him that he remembered Ferrier well at College; he described him as
-'careless about University work,' but as writing clever verses, several
-of which he repeated with considerable gusto. Of other friends the
-names alone are preserved, William Edward Collins, afterwards
-Collins-Wood of Keithick, Perthshire, who died in 1877, and J. P.
-Shirley of Ettington Park, in Warwickshire;[3] but what influences were
-brought to bear upon him by his University life, or whether his
-interest in philosophical pursuits were in any way aroused during his
-time at College, we have no means of telling. A later friend, Henry
-Inglis, wrote of these early days: 'My friendship with Ferrier began
-about the time he was leaving Oxford, or immediately after he had left
-it--I should say about 1830 or thereabout. At that University I don't
-think he did anything more remarkable than contracting a large tailor's
-bill; which annoyed him for many years afterwards. At that time he was
-a wonderfully handsome, intellectual-looking young man,--a tremendous
-"swell" from top to toe, and with his hair hanging down over his
-shoulders.' Though later on in life this last characteristic was not so
-marked, Ferrier's photographs show his hair still fairly long and
-brushed off a finely-modelled square forehead, such as is usually
-associated with strongly developed intellectual faculties.
-
- [2] The gentlemen-commoners at Magdalen, as elsewhere, paid
- higher fees and wore a distinctive costume; at Magdalen they
- had a common room of their own, distinct from that of the
- Fellows, or the Demies or Scholars, and seldom read for
- honours. In Ferrier's days Magdalen College admitted no
- ordinary commoners, and there were but few resident
- undergraduates, many of the thirty demies being graduates
- and non-resident. In the year of his matriculation there
- were only ten gentlemen-commoners; thus, as far as
- undergraduates went, the College was a small one.
-
- [3] Mr. Shirley was Member of Parliament for South
- Warwickshire, a well-known genealogist, and the author of
- _The Noble and Gentle Men of England_.
-
-It is known that Ferrier took his Bachelor's degree in 1832, and that
-he had by that time managed to acquire a very tolerable knowledge of
-the classics and begun to study philosophy, so that his time could not
-have been entirely idle. For the rest, he probably passed happily
-through his years at College, as many others have done before and after
-him, without allowing more weighty cares to dwell upon his mind.
-Another friend of after days, the late Principal Tulloch, after noting
-the fact that Oxford had not then developed the philosophic spirit
-which in recent years has marked her schools, and which had not then
-taken root any more than the High Church movement which preceded it,
-goes on: 'It may be doubted, indeed, whether Oxford exercised any
-definite intellectual influence on Professor Ferrier. He had imbibed
-his love for the Latin poets before he went there, and his devotion to
-Greek philosophy was an after-growth with which he never associated his
-Magdalen studies. To one who visited the College with him many years
-afterwards, and to whom he pointed out with admiration its noble walks
-and trees, his associations with the place seemed to be mainly those of
-amusement. There is reason to think that few of those who knew him at
-Magdalen would have afterwards recognised him in the laborious student
-at St. Andrews, who for weeks together would scarcely cross the
-threshold of his study; and yet to all who knew him well, there was
-nevertheless a clear connection between the gay gownsman and the
-hard-working Professor.'
-
-In 1832, Ferrier became an advocate at Edinburgh, but it does not
-appear that he had any serious idea of practising at the Bar. This is
-the period at which we know that the passion for metaphysical
-speculation laid hold of him,--a passion which is unintelligible and
-inexplicable to those who do not share in it,--and as Ferrier could not
-clearly say in what direction this was leading him, as far as practical
-life was concerned, he probably deemed it best to attach himself to a
-profession which left much scope to the adopter of it, to strike out
-lines of his own. What led Ferrier to determine to spend some months of
-the year 1834 at Heidelberg it would be extremely interesting to know.
-The friend first quoted writes: 'I cannot tell of the influences under
-which he devoted himself to metaphysics. My opinion is that there were
-none, but that he was a philosopher born. He attached himself at once
-to the fellowship of Sir William Hamilton, to whom he was introduced by
-a common friend--I think the late Mr. Ludovic Colquhoun. I know that he
-looked on Sir William at that time as his master.'
-
-Probably the friendship with Hamilton simply arose from the natural
-attraction which two sympathetic spirits feel to one another. It is
-clear that at this time Ferrier's bent was towards metaphysics, and
-that, as Mr. Inglis says, this bent was born with him and was only
-beginning to find its natural outlet; therefore it would be very
-natural to suppose that acquaintance would be sought with one who was
-at this time in the zenith of his powers, and whose writings in the
-_Edinburgh Review_ were exciting liveliest interest. A casual
-acquaintanceship between the young man of three-and-twenty and the
-matured philosopher twenty years his senior soon ripened into a
-friendship, not perhaps common between two men so different in age. It
-is perhaps more remarkable considering the differences in opinion on
-philosophical questions which soon arose between the two; for it is
-just as difficult for those whose point of view is fundamentally
-opposed on speculative questions to carry on an intercourse concerning
-their pursuits which shall be both friendly and unconstrained, as for
-two political opponents to discuss vital questions of policy without
-any undercurrent of self-restraint, when they start from entirely
-opposite principles. Most likely had the two been actually
-contemporaries it might not have been so easy, but as it was, the
-younger man started with, and preserved, the warmest feelings to his
-senior; and even in his criticisms he expresses himself in the
-strongest terms of gratitude: 'He (Hamilton) has taught those who study
-him to _think_, and he must take the consequences, whether they think
-in unison with himself or not. We conceive, however, that even those
-who differ from him most, would readily own that to his instructive
-disquisitions they were indebted for at least half of all they know of
-philosophy.' And in the appendix to the _Institutes_, written soon
-after Sir William's death, Ferrier says: 'Morally and intellectually,
-Sir William Hamilton was among the greatest of the great. A simpler and
-a grander nature never arose out of darkness into human life; a truer
-and a manlier character God never made. For years together scarcely a
-day passed in which I was not in his company for hours, and never on
-this earth may I expect to live such happy hours again. I have learned
-more from him than from all other philosophers put together; more, both
-as regards what I assented to and what I dissented from.' It was this
-open and free discussion of all questions that came before
-them--discussion in which there must have been much difference of
-opinion freely expressed on both sides, that made these evenings spent
-in Manor Place, where the Hamiltons, then a recently married couple,
-had lately settled, so delightful to young Ferrier. He had
-individuality and originality enough not to be carried away by the
-arguments used by so great an authority and so learned a man as his
-friend was reckoned, and then as later he constantly expressed his
-regret that powers so great had been devoted to the service of a
-philosophic system--that of Reid--of which Ferrier so thoroughly
-disapproved. But at the same time he hardly dared to expect that the
-labours of a lifetime could be set aside at the bidding of a man so
-much his junior, and to say the truth it is doubtful whether Hamilton
-ever fully grasped his opponent's point of view. Still, Ferrier tells
-us that from first to last his whole intercourse with Sir William
-Hamilton was marked with more pleasure and less pain than ever attended
-his intercourse with any human being, and after Hamilton was gone he
-cherished that memory with affectionate esteem. A touching account is
-given in Sir William's life of how during that terrible illness which
-so sadly impaired his powers and nearly took his life, Ferrier might be
-seen pacing to and fro on the street opposite his bedroom window during
-the whole anxious night, watching for indications of his condition, yet
-unwilling to intrude on the attendants, and unable to tear himself from
-the spot where his friend was possibly passing through the last agony.
-Such friendship is honourable to both men concerned.
-
-Perhaps, then, it was this intercourse with kindred spirits (for many
-such were in the habit of gathering at the Professor's house) that
-caused Ferrier finally to determine to make philosophy the pursuit of
-his life--this combined, it may be, with the interest in letters which
-he could not fail to derive from his own immediate circle. He was in
-constant communication with Susan Ferrier, his aunt, who encouraged his
-literary bent to the utmost of her power. Then Professor Wilson, his
-uncle, though of a very different character from his own, attracted him
-by his brightness and wit--a brightness which he says he can hardly
-bring before himself, far less communicate to others who had not known
-him. Perhaps, as the same friend quoted before suggests, the attraction
-was partly due to another source. He says: 'How Ferrier got on with
-Wilson I never could divine; unless it were through the bright eyes of
-his daughter. Wilson and Ferrier seemed to me as opposite as the poles;
-the one all poetry, the other all prose. But the youth probably yielded
-to the mature majesty and genius of the man. Had they met on equal
-terms I don't think they could have agreed for ten minutes. As it was,
-they had serious differences at times, which, however, I believe were
-all ultimately and happily adjusted.'
-
-The visits to his uncle's home, and the attractive young lady whom he
-there met, must have largely contributed to Ferrier's happiness in
-these years of mental fermentation. Such times come in many men's lives
-when youth is turning into manhood, and powers are wakening up within
-that seem as though they would lead us we know not whither. And so it
-may have been with Ferrier. But he was endowed with considerable
-calmness and self-command, combined with a confidence in his powers
-sufficient to carry him through many difficulties that might otherwise
-have got the better of him. Wilson's home, Elleray, near the Lake of
-Windermere, was the centre of a circle of brilliant stars. Ferrier
-recollected, while still a lad of seventeen years of age, meeting there
-at one time, in the summer of 1825, Scott, Wordsworth, Lockhart, and
-Canning, a conjunction difficult to beat.[4] Once more, we are told,
-and on a sadder occasion, he came into association with the greatest
-Scottish novelist. 'It was on that gloomy voyage when the suffering man
-was conveyed to Leith from London, on his return from his ill-fated
-foreign journey. Mr. Ferrier was also a passenger, and scarcely dared
-to look on the almost unconscious form of one whose genius he so warmly
-admired.' The end was then very near.
-
- [4] This meeting occurred after the Irish tour of Scott,
- Miss Anne Scott, and Lockhart, when they visited Wilson at
- Elleray. Canning was staying at Storre, in the
- neighbourhood.
-
-Professor Ferrier's daughter tells us that long after, in the summer of
-1856, the family went to visit the English Lakes, the centre of
-attraction being Elleray, Mr. Ferrier's old home and birthplace. 'The
-very name of Elleray breathes of poetry and romance. Our father and
-mother had, of course, known it in its glorious prime, when our
-grandfather, "Christopher North," wrestled with dalesmen, strolled in
-his slippers with Wordsworth to Keswick (a distance of seventeen
-miles), and kept his ten-oared barge in the long drawing-room of
-Elleray. In these days they had "rich company," and the names of
-Southey, Wordsworth, De Quincey, and Coleridge were to them familiar
-household words. The cottage my mother was born in still stands,
-overshadowed by a giant sycamore.'
-
-We can easily imagine the effect which society such as this would have
-on a young man's mind. But more than that, the friendship with the
-attractive cousin, Margaret Wilson, developed into something warmer,
-and an engagement was finally formed, which culminated in his marriage
-in 1837. Not many of James Ferrier's letters to his cousin during the
-long engagement have been preserved; the few that are were written from
-Germany in 1834, the year in which he went to Heidelberg; they were
-addressed to Thirlstane House, near Selkirk, where Miss Wilson was
-residing, and they give a lively account of his adventures.
-
-The voyage from Leith to Rotterdam, judging from the first letter
-written from Heidelberg, and dated August 1834, would appear to have
-begun in inauspicious fashion. Ferrier writes: 'I have just been here a
-week, and would have answered your letter sooner, had it not been that
-I wished to make myself tolerably well acquainted with the surrounding
-scenery before writing to you, and really the heat has been so
-overwhelming that I have been impelled to take matters leisurely, and
-have not even yet been able to get through so much _view-hunting_ as I
-should have wished. What I have seen I will endeavour to describe to
-you. This place itself is most delightful, and the country about it is
-magnificent. But this, as a reviewer would say, _by way of
-anticipation_. Have patience, and in the meantime let me take events in
-their natural order, and begin by telling you I sailed from Leith on
-the morning of the second of this month, with no wind at all. We
-drifted on, I know not how, and toward evening were within gunshot of
-Inchkeith; on the following morning we were in sight of the Bass, and
-in sight of the same we continued during the whole day. For the next
-two or three days we went beating up against a head-wind, which forced
-us to tack so much that whenever we made one mile we travelled ten, a
-pleasant mode of progressing, is it not? However, I had the whole ship
-to myself, and plenty of female society in the person of the captain's
-lady, who, being fond of pleasure, had chosen to diversify her
-monotonous existence at Leith by taking a delightful summer trip to
-Rotterdam, which confined her to her crib during almost the whole of
-our passage under the pressure of racking headaches and roaring
-sickness. She had a weary time of it, poor woman, and nothing could do
-her any good--neither spelding, cheese, nor finnan haddies, nor bacon,
-nor broth, nor salt beef, nor ale, nor gin, nor brandy and water, nor
-Epsom salts, though of one or other of these she was _aye takin'_ a wee
-bit, or a little drop. We were nearly a week in clearing our own Firth,
-and did no good till we got as far as Scarborough. At this place I had
-serious intentions of getting ashore if possible, and making out the
-rest of my journey by means that were more to be depended on. Just in
-the nick of time, however, a fair wind sprang up, and from Scarborough
-we had a capital run, with little or no interruption, to the end of our
-voyage.' An account of a ten days' voyage which makes us thankful to be
-in great measure independent of the winds at sea! Holland, our
-traveller thinks an intolerable country to live in, and the first
-impressions of the Rhine are distinctly unfavourable. 'The river
-himself is a fine fellow, certainly, but the country through which he
-flows is stale, flat, though I believe, not unprofitable. The banks on
-either side are covered either with reeds or with a matting of rank
-shrubbery formed apparently out of dirty green worsted, and the
-continuance of it so palls upon the senses that the mind at last
-becomes unconscious of everything except the constant flap-flapping of
-the weary paddles as they go beating on, awakening the dull echoes of
-the sedgy shores. The eye is occasionally relieved by patches of naked
-sand, and now and then a stone about the size of your fist, diversifies
-the monotony of the scene. Occasionally, in the distance, are to be
-seen funny, forlorn-looking objects, trying evidently to look like
-trees, but whether they would really turn out to be trees on a nearer
-inspection is what I very much doubt.' At Cologne he had an amusing
-meeting with an Englishman, 'whom I at once twigged to be an Oxford
-man, and more, even, an Oxford tutor. There is a stiff twitch in the
-right shoulder of the tribe, answering to a similar one in the hip-bone
-on the same side, which there is no mistaking.' The tutor appears to
-have done valiant service in making known the traveller's wants in
-French to waiters, etc., though 'he spent rather too much of his time
-in scheming how to abridge the sixpence which, "time out of mind," has
-been the perquisite of Boots, doorkeepers, etc.' 'But,' he adds in
-excuse, 'his name was Bull, and therefore, as the authentic epitome of
-his countrymen, he would not fail to possess this along with the other
-peculiarities of Englishmen.' From Cologne, Ferrier went to Bonn, where
-he had an introduction to Dr. Welsh, and then proceeded up the Rhine to
-Mayence. He does not form a very high estimate of the beauty of the
-scenery. He feels 'a want of something; in fact, to my mind, there is a
-want of everything which makes earth, wood, and water something more
-than mere water, wood, and earth. We have here a constant and endless
-variety of imposing objects (imposing is just the word for them), but
-there is no variety in them, nothing but one round-backed hill after
-another, generally carrying their woods, when they have any, very
-stiffly, and when they have none presenting to the eye a surface of
-tawdry and squalid patchwork,' thus suggesting, in his view, a series
-of children's gardens--an impression often left on travellers when
-visiting this same country. His next letters find him settled in the
-University town of Heidelberg.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER II
-
-WANDERJAHRE--SOCIAL LIFE IN SCOTLAND--BEGINNING OF HIS LITERARY LIFE
-
-
-In the present century in Germany we have seen a period of almost
-unparalleled literary glory succeeded by a time of great commercial
-prosperity and national enthusiasm. But when Ferrier visited that
-country in 1834 the era of its intellectual greatness had hardly passed
-away; some, at least, of its stars remained, and others had very
-recently ceased to be. Goethe had died just two years before, but Heine
-lived till many years afterwards; amongst the philosophers, though Kant
-and Fichte, of course, were long since gone, Schelling was still at
-work at Munich, and Hegel lived at Berlin till November of 1831, when
-he was cut off during an epidemic of cholera. Most of the great men had
-disappeared, and yet the memory of their achievements still survived,
-and the impetus they gave to thought could not have been lost. The
-traditional lines of speculation consistently carried out since
-Reformation days had survived war and national calamity, and it
-remained to be seen whether the greater tests of prosperity and success
-would be as triumphantly undergone.
-
-We can imagine Ferrier's feelings when this new world opened up before
-him, a Scottish youth, to whom it was a new, untrodden country. It may
-be true that it was his literary rather than his speculative affinities
-that first attracted him to Germany. To form in literature he always
-attached the greatest value, and to the end his interest in letters was
-only second to his attachment to philosophy. German poetry was to him
-what it was to so many of the youth of the country from which it
-came--the expression of their deepest, and likewise of their freshest
-aspiration. The poetry of other countries and other tongues--English
-and Latin, for example--meant much to him, but that of Germany was
-nearest to his heart. French learning did not attract him; neither its
-literature nor its metaphysics and psychological method appealed to his
-thoughtful, analytic mind; but in Germany he found a nation which had
-not as yet resigned its interest in things of transcendental import in
-favour of what pertained to mere material welfare.
-
-Such was the Germany into which Ferrier came in 1834. He did not, so
-far as we can hear, enter deeply into its social life; he visited it as
-a traveller, rather than as a student, and his stay in it was brief.
-Considering the shortness of his time there, and the circumstances of
-his visit, the impression that it made upon him is all the more
-remarkable, for it was an impression that lasted and was evident
-throughout all his after life. Since his day, indeed, it would be
-difficult to say how many young Scotsmen have been impressed in a
-similar way by a few months' residence at a University town in Germany.
-For partly owing to Ferrier's own efforts, and perhaps even more owing
-to the 'boom'--to use a vulgarism--brought about by Carlyle's writings,
-and by his first making known the marvels of German literature to the
-ordinary English-speaking public, who had never learned the language or
-tried to understand its recent history, the old traditional literary
-alliance between Scotland and France appeared for the time being to
-have broken down in favour of a similar association with its rival
-country, Germany. The work of Goethe was at last appreciated, nothing
-was now too favourable to say about its merits; philosophy was suddenly
-discovered to have its home in Germany, and there alone; our insularity
-in keeping to our antiquated methods--dryasdust, we were told, as the
-old ones of the schools, and perhaps as edifying--was vigorously
-denounced. Theology, which had hitherto found complete support from the
-philosophic system which acted as her handmaid, and was only tolerated
-as such, was naturally affected in like manner by the change; and to
-her credit be it said, that instead of with averted eyes looking
-elsewhere, as might easily have been done, she determined to face the
-worst, and wisely asked the question whether in her department too she
-had not something she could learn from a sister country across the sea.
-Hence a great change was brought about in the mental attitude of
-Scotland; but we anticipate.
-
-Ferrier, after leaving Heidelberg, paid a short visit to Leipzig, and
-then for a few weeks took up his abode at Berlin. From Leipzig he
-writes to Miss Wilson again: 'How do you like an _epistola_ dated from
-this great emporium of taste and letters, this culminating point of
-Germanism, where waggons jostle philosophy, and tobacco-impregnated air
-is articulated into divinest music? It is fair-time, and I did not
-arrive, as one usually does, a day _behind_ it, but on the very day it
-commenced. It will last, I believe, some weeks, and during that time
-all business is done on the open streets, which are lined on each side
-with large wooden booths, and are swarming with men and merchandise of
-every description and from every quarter of the world. It very much
-resembles a _Ladies' Sale_ in the Assembly Rooms (what I never saw),
-only the ladies here are frequently Jews with fierce beards, and have
-always a pipe in their mouths when not eating or drinking. As you walk
-along you will find the order of the day to be somewhat as follows. You
-first come to pipes, then shawls, then nails, then pipes, pipes again,
-pipes, gingerbread, dolls, then pipes, bridles, spurs, pipes, books,
-warming-pans, pipes, china, writing-desks, pipes again, pipes, pipes,
-pipes, nothing but pipes--the very pen will write nothing but pipes.
-Pipes, you see, decidedly carry it. I wonder they don't erect public
-tobacco-smoke works, lay _pipes_ for it along the streets, and smoke
-away--a city at a time. Private families might take it in as we do
-gas!'
-
-Ferrier appears to have spent a week at Frankfort before reaching his
-destination at Leipzig. He describes his journey there: 'At Frankfort I
-saw nothing worthy of note except a divine statue of Ariadne riding on
-a leopard. After lumbering along for two nights and two days in a
-clumsy diligence, I reached Leipzig two days ago. I thought that by the
-way I might perhaps see something worthy of mention, and accordingly
-sometimes put my head out of the window to look. But no--the trees, for
-instance, had all to a man planted their heads in the earth, and were
-growing with their legs upwards, just as they do with us; and as for
-the natives, they, on the contrary, had each of them filled a
-flower-pot, called a skull, full of earth, put their heads in it, and
-were growing _downwards_, just as the same animal does in our country;
-and on coming to one's recollection in the morning in a German
-diligence you find yourself surrounded by the same drowsy, idiotical,
-glazed, stained, and gummy complement of faces which might have
-accompanied you into Carlisle on an autumn morning after a night of
-travel in His Majesty's mail coach.'
-
-Berlin impressed Ferrier by its imposing public buildings and general
-aspect of prosperity. It had, of course, long before reached a position
-of importance under the great Frederick's government, though not the
-importance or the size that it afterwards attained. Still, it was the
-centre of attraction for all classes throughout Prussia, and possessed
-a cultivated society in which the middle-class element was to all
-appearances predominant. Ferrier writes of the town: 'Of the inside of
-the buildings and what is to be seen there I have nothing yet to say,
-but their external aspect is most magnificent. Palaces, churches,
-mosque-like structures, spires and domes and towers all standing
-together, but with large spaces and fine open drives between, so that
-all are seen to the greatest possible advantage, conspire to form a
-most glorious city. At this moment a fountain which I can see from my
-window is playing in the middle of the square. A _jet d'eau_ indeed!!
-It may do very well for a Frenchman to call it that, but we must call
-it a perfect volcano of water. A huge column goes hissing up as high as
-a steeple, with the speed and force of a rocket, and comes down in
-thunder, and little rainbows are flitting about in the showery spray.
-It being Sunday, every thing and person is gayer than usual. Bands are
-playing and soldiers are parading all through the town; everything,
-indeed, is military, and yet little is foppish--a statement which to
-English ears will sound like a direct contradiction.'
-
-Our traveller had been given letters to certain Berlin Professors from
-young Blackie, afterwards Professor of Greek in Edinburgh University,
-who had just translated Goethe's _Faust_ into the English tongue. 'I
-went about half an hour ago to call upon a sort of Professor here to
-whom I had a letter and a _Faust_ to present from Blackie--found him
-ill and confined to bed--was admitted, however, very well received, and
-shall call again when I think there is a chance of his being better. I
-have still another Professor to call on with a letter and book from
-Blackie, and there my acquaintance with the society of Berlin is likely
-to terminate.' One other introduction to Ferrier on this expedition to
-Germany is mentioned in a note from his aunt, Miss Susan Ferrier, the
-only letter to her nephew that has apparently been preserved: whether
-or not he availed himself of the offer, history does not record. It
-runs as follows:--
-
- 'EDINR., _1st August_.
-
- 'I could not get a letter to Lord Corehouse's German sister
- (Countess Purgstall), as it seems she is in bad health, and not fit
- to entertain vagabonds; but I enclose a very kind one from my
- friend, Mrs. Erskine, to the ambassadress at Munich, and if you
- don't go there you may send it by post, as it will be welcome at
- any time on its own account.'
-
-It was, as has been said, only about three years previously to this
-visit that Hegel had passed away at Berlin, and one wonders whether
-Ferrier first began to interest himself in his writings at this time,
-and whether he visited the graveyard near the city gate where Hegel
-lies, close to his great predecessor Fichte. One would almost think
-this last was so from the exact description given in his short
-biography of Hegel; and it is significant that on his return he brought
-with him a medallion and a photograph of the great philosopher. This
-would seem to indicate that his thoughts were already tending in the
-direction of Hegelian metaphysics, but how far this was so we cannot
-tell. Certainly the knowledge of the German language acquired by
-Ferrier during this visit to the country proved most valuable to him,
-and enabled him to study its philosophy at a time when translations
-were practically non-existent, and few had learned to read it. That
-knowledge must indeed have been tolerably complete, for in 1851, when
-Sir Edward Bulwer (afterwards Lord Lytton) was about to republish his
-translation of Schiller's Ballads, he corresponded with Ferrier
-regarding the accuracy and exactness of his work. He afterwards, in the
-preface to the volume, acknowledges the great services Ferrier had
-rendered; and in dedicating the book to him, speaks of the debt of
-gratitude he owes to one whose 'critical judgment and skill in
-detecting the finer shades of meaning in the original' had been so
-useful. Ferrier likewise has the credit, accorded him by De Quincey, of
-having corrected several errors in _all_ the English translations of
-_Faust_ then extant--errors which were not merely literary
-inaccuracies, but which also detracted from the vital sense of the
-original. As to Lord Lytton, Ferrier must at this time have been
-interested in his writings; for in a letter to Miss Wilson, he advises
-her to read Bulwer's _Pilgrims of the Rhine_ if she wishes for a
-description of the scenery, and speaks of the high esteem with which he
-was regarded by the Germans.
-
-It was in 1837 that Ferrier married the young lady with whom he had so
-long corresponded. The marriage was in all respects a happy one. Mrs.
-Ferrier's gifts and graces, inherited from her father, will not soon be
-forgotten, either in St. Andrews where she lived so long, or in
-Edinburgh, the later home of her widowhood. One whose spirits were less
-gay might have found a husband whose interests were so completely in
-his work--and that a work in which she could not share--difficult to
-deal with; but she possessed understanding to appreciate that work, as
-well as humour, and could accommodate herself to the circumstances in
-which she found herself; while he, on his part, entered into the gaiety
-on occasion with the best. A friend and student of the St. Andrews'
-days writes of Ferrier: 'He married his cousin Margaret, Professor's
-Wilson's daughter, and I don't doubt that a shorthand report of their
-courtship would have been better worth reading than nine hundred and
-ninety-nine out of every thousand courtships, for she had wit as well
-as beauty, and he was capable of appreciating both. No more charming
-woman have I ever seen or heard making game of mankind in general, and
-in particular of pedants and hypocrites. She would even laugh at her
-husband on occasion, but it was dangerous for any volunteer to try to
-help her in that sport. A finer-looking couple I have never seen.[5]
-
- [5] Another sister married William Edmondstoune Aytoun, the
- poet. It was regarding Professor Aytoun's proposal for Miss
- Wilson's hand that the following story is told. When the
- engagement was being formed, Aytoun somewhat demurred to
- interviewing the father of the lady, and she herself
- undertook the mission. Presently she returned with a card
- pinned upon her breast bearing the satisfactory inscription,
- 'With the author's compliments'! Aytoun, as is well known,
- was extremely plain, and it was of his bust in the
- Blackwoods' saloon, a recognisable but idealistic likeness,
- that Ferrier remarked, 'I should call that the pursuit of
- beauty under difficulties.'
-
-During her infancy Edinburgh had become Mrs. Ferrier's home, though she
-made frequent visits to Westmorland, of whose dialect she had a
-complete command. The courtship, however, had been for the most part
-carried on at the picturesque old house of Gorton, where 'Christopher
-North' was temporarily residing, and which, situated as it is
-overlooking the lovely glen made immortal by the name of Hawthornden,
-in view of Roslin Chapel, and surrounded by old-fashioned walks and
-gardens, must have been an ideal spot for a romantic couple like the
-Ferriers to roam in. Another friend writes of Wilson's later home at
-Elleray: 'In his hospitable house, where the wits of _Blackwood_
-gathered at intervals and visited individually in season and out of
-season, his daughter saw strange men of genius, such as few young
-ladies had the fortune to see, and heard talk such as hardly another
-has the fortune to hear. Lockhart, with his caricatures and his
-incisive sarcasm, was an intimate of the house. The Ettrick Shepherd,
-with his plaid and homely Doric, broke in occasionally, as did also De
-Quincey, generally towards midnight, when he used to sit pouring forth
-his finely-balanced, graceful sentences far on among the small hours of
-the morning. There were students, too, year after year, many of them
-not undistinguished, and some of whom had, we doubt not, ideas of their
-own regarding the flashing hazel eyes of their eloquent Professor's
-eldest daughter.' But her cousin was her choice, though wealth offered
-no attraction, and neither side had reason to regret the marriage of
-affection.
-
-At the time of his marriage Ferrier had been practising at the Bar,
-probably with no great measure of success, seeing that his heart was
-not really set upon his work. It was at this period that he first began
-to write, and his first contribution to literature took the form of
-certain papers contributed to _Blackwood's Magazine_, the subject being
-the 'Philosophy of Consciousness.' From that time onwards Ferrier
-continued to write on philosophic or literary topics until his death,
-and many of these writings were first published in the famous magazine.
-
-Before entering, however, on any consideration of Ferrier's writings
-and of the philosophy of the day, it might be worth while to try to
-picture to ourselves the social conditions and feelings of the time, in
-order that we may get some idea of the influences which surrounded him,
-and be assisted in our efforts to understand his outlook.
-
-In the beginning of the nineteenth century Scotland had been ground
-down by a strange tyranny--the tyranny of one man as it seemed, which
-man was Henry Dundas, first Viscount Melville, who for many long years
-ruled our country as few countries have been ruled before. What this
-despotism meant it is difficult for us, a century later, to figure to
-ourselves. All offices were dependent on his patronage; it was to him
-that everyone had to look for whatever post, advancement, or concession
-was required. And Dundas, with consummate power and administrative
-ability, moulded Scotland to his will, and by his own acts made her
-what she was before the world. But all the while, though unperceived, a
-new spirit was really dawning; the principles of the Revolution, in
-spite of everything, had spread, and all unobserved the time-spirit
-made its influence felt below a surface of apparent calm. It laid hold
-first of all of the common people--weavers and the like: it roused
-these rough, uneducated men to a sense of wrong and the resolution to
-seek a remedy. Not much, however, was accomplished. Some futile risings
-took place--risings pitiable in their inadequacy--of hard-working
-weavers armed with pikes and antiquated muskets. Of course, such rebels
-were easily suppressed; the leaders were sentenced to execution or
-transportation, as the case might be; but though peace apparently was
-restored and public meetings to oppose the Government were rigorously
-suppressed, trade and manufactures were arising: Scotland was not
-really dead, as she appeared. A new life was dawning: reform was in the
-air, and in due time made its presence felt. But the memory of these
-times of political oppression, when the franchise was the privilege of
-the few, and of the few who were entirely out of sympathy with the most
-part of their countrymen or their country's wants, remained with the
-people just as did the 'Killing-time' of Covenanting days two centuries
-before. Time heals the wounds of a country as of an individual, but the
-operation is slow, and it is doubtful whether either period of history
-will ever be forgotten. At anyrate, if they are so as this century
-closes, they were not in the Scotland known to Ferrier; they were still
-a very present memory and one whose influence was keenly felt.
-
-And along with this political struggle yet another struggle was taking
-place, no less real though not so evident. The religion of the country
-had been as dead as was the politics in the century that was gone--dead
-in the sleep of Moderatism and indifferentism. But it, too, had
-awakened; the evangelical school arose, liberty of church government
-was claimed, a liberty which, when denied it, rent the Established
-Church in twain.
-
-In our country it has been characteristic that great movements have
-usually begun with those most in touch with its inmost life, the
-so-called lower orders of its citizens. The nobles and the kings have
-rather followed than taken the lead. In the awakening of the present
-century this at anyrate was the case. 'Society,' so called, remained
-conservative in its view for long after the people had determined to
-advance. Scott, it must be remembered, was a retrogressive influence.
-The romanticism of his novels lent a charm to days gone by which might
-or might not be deserved; but they also encouraged their readers to
-imagine a revival of those days of chivalry as a possibility even now,
-when men were crying for their rights, when they had awakened to a
-sense of their possessions, and would take nothing in their place. The
-real chieftains were no more; they were imitation chieftains only who
-were playing at the game, and it was a game the clansmen would not join
-in. Few exercises could be more strange than first to read the account
-of Scottish life in one of the immortal novels by Scott dealing with
-last century, and then to turn to Miss Ferrier or Galt, depicting a
-period not so very different. Setting aside all questions of genius,
-where comparison would be absurd, it would seem as if a beautiful
-enamel had been removed, and a bare reality revealed, somewhat sordid
-in comparison. The life was not really sordid,--realism as usual had
-overshot its mark,--but the enamel had been somewhat thickly laid, and
-might require to be removed, if truth were to be revealed.
-
-So in the higher grades of Edinburgh society the enamel of gentility
-has done its best to prejudice us against much true and genuine worth.
-It was characterised by a certain conventional unconventionality, a
-certain 'preciosity' which brought it near deserving a still stronger
-name, and it maintained its right to formulate the canons of criticism
-for the kingdom. Edinburgh, it must be recollected, was no 'mean city,'
-no ordinary provincial town. It was still esteemed a metropolis. It had
-its aristocracy, though mainly of the order of those unable to bear the
-greater expense of London life. It had no manufactories to speak of, no
-mercantile class to 'vulgarise' it; it possessed a University, and the
-law courts of the nation. But above all it had a literary society. In
-the beginning of the century it had such men as Henry Mackenzie, Dugald
-Stewart, John Playfair, Dr. Gregory, Dr. Thomas Brown, not to speak of
-Scott and Jeffrey--a society unrivalled out of London. And in later
-days, when these were gone, others rose to fill their places.
-
-Of course, in addition to the movement of the working people, there was
-an educated protest against Toryism, and it was made by a party who, to
-their credit be it said, risked their prospects of advancement for the
-principles of freedom. In their days Toryism, we must recollect, meant
-something very different from what it might be supposed to signify in
-our own. It meant an attitude of obstruction as regards all change from
-established standards of whatever kind; it signified a point of view
-which said that grievances should be unredressed unless it was in its
-interest to redress them. The new party of opposition included in its
-numbers Whig lawyers like Gibson Craig and Henry Erskine, in earlier
-days, and Francis Jeffrey and Lord Cockburn later on; a party of
-progress was also formed within the Church, and the same within the
-precincts of the University. The movement, as became a movement on the
-political side largely headed by lawyers, had no tendency to violence;
-it was moderate in its policy, and by no means revolutionary--indeed it
-may be doubted whether there ever was much tendency to revolt even
-amongst those working men who expressed themselves most strongly. The
-advance party, however, carried the day, and when Ferrier began to
-write, Scotland was in a very different state from that of twenty years
-before. The Reform Bill had passed, and men had the moulding of their
-country's destiny practically placed within their hands. In the
-University, again, Sir William Hamilton, a Whig, had just been
-appointed to the Chair of Logic, while Moncreiff, Chalmers, and the
-rest, were prominent in the Church. The traditions of literary
-Edinburgh at the beginning of the century had been kept up by a circle
-amongst whom Lockhart, Wilson, and De Quincey may be mentioned; now
-Carlyle, who had left Edinburgh not long before, was coming into
-notice, and a new era seemed to be dawning, not so glorious as the
-past, but more untrammelled and more free.
-
-How philosophy was affected by the change, and how Ferrier assisted in
-its progress, it is our business now to tell; but we must first briefly
-sketch the history of Scottish speculation to this date, in order to
-show the position in which he found it.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER III
-
-PHILOSOPHY BEFORE FERRIER'S DAY
-
-
-In attempting to give some idea of philosophy as it was in Scotland in
-the earlier portion of the present century, we shall have to go back
-two hundred years or thereabout, in order to find a satisfactory basis
-from which to start. For philosophy, as no one realised more than
-Ferrier, is no arbitrary succession of systems following one upon
-another as their propounders might decree; it is a development in the
-truest and highest significance of that word. It means the gradual
-working out of the questions which reason sets to be answered; and
-though it seems as if we had sometimes to turn our faces backwards, and
-to revert to systems of bygone days, we always find, when we look more
-closely, that in our onward course we have merely dropped some thread
-in our web, the recovery of which is requisite in order that it may be
-duly taken up and woven with the rest.
-
-At the time of which we write the so-called 'Scottish School' of Reid,
-Stewart, and Beattie reigned supreme in orthodox Scotland; it had
-undisputed power in the Universities, and besides this obtained a very
-reputable place in the estimation of Europe, and more especially of
-France. As it was this school more especially that Ferrier spent much
-of his time in combating, it is its history and place that we wish
-shortly to describe. To do so, however, it is needful to go back to its
-real founder, Locke, in order that its point of view may fairly be set
-forth.
-
-In applying his mind to the views of Locke, the ordinary man finds
-himself arriving at very commonplace and well-accustomed conceptions.
-Locke, indeed, may reasonably be said to represent the ideas of common,
-everyday life. The ordinary man does not question the reality of
-things, he accepts it without asking any questions, and bases his
-theories--scientific or otherwise--upon this implied reality. Locke
-worked out the theory which had been propounded by Lord Bacon, that
-knowledge is obtained by the observation of facts which are implicitly
-accepted as realities; and what, it was asked, could be more
-self-evident and sane? It is easy to conceive a number of perceiving
-minds upon the one hand, ready to take up perceptions of an outside
-material substance upon the other. The mind may be considered as a
-piece of white paper--a _tabula rasa_, as it was called--on which
-external things may make what impression they will, and knowledge is
-apparently explained at once. But though Locke certainly succeeded in
-making these terms the common coin of ordinary life, difficulties crop
-up when we come to examine them more closely. After all, it is evident,
-the only knowledge our mind can have is a knowledge of its own
-ideas--ideas which are, of course, caused by something which is
-outside, or at least, as Locke would say, by its _quality_. Now, from
-this it would appear that these 'ideas' after all come between the mind
-and the 'thing,' whatever it is, that causes them--that is to say, we
-can perhaps maintain that we only know our 'ideas,' and not things as
-in themselves. Locke passes into elaborate distinctions between primary
-qualities of things, of which he holds exact representations are given,
-and secondary qualities, which are not in the same position; but the
-whole difficulty we meet with is summed up in the question whether we
-really _know_ substance, or whether it is that we can only hope to know
-ideas, and 'suppose' some substratum of reality outside. Then another
-difficulty is that we can hardly really know our _selves_. How can we
-know that the self exists; and if, like Malebranche, we speak of God
-revealing substance to us, how do we know about God? We cannot form any
-'general' impressions, have any 'general' knowledge; only a sort of
-conglomeration of unrelated or detached bits of knowledge can possibly
-come home to us. The fact is, that modern philosophy starts with two
-separate and self-existent substances; that it does not see how they
-can be combined, and that the 'white-paper' theory is so abstract that
-we can never arrive at self-consciousness by its means.
-
-Berkeley followed out the logical consequences of Locke, though perhaps
-he hardly knew where these would carry him. He acknowledged that we
-know nothing but ideas--nothing outside of our mind. But he adds the
-conception of self, and by analogy the conception of God, who acts as a
-principle of causation. Whether there is necessary connection in his
-sensations or not, he does not say. Hume followed with criticism,
-scathing and merciless. He states that all we know of is the experience
-we have; and by experience he signifies perceptions. Ideas to him are
-nothing more than perceptions, and whether they are ideas simply of the
-mind, or ideas of some object, is to him the same. If we begin to
-imagine such conceptions as those of universality or necessity, of God
-or the self, beyond a complex of successive ideas, we are going farther
-than experience permits. We cannot connect our perceptions with an
-object, nor can we get beyond what experience allows. Custom merely
-brings about certain conclusions which are often enough misleading. It
-connects effect and cause, really different events: it brings about
-ideas of morality very often deceptive. We have our custom of regarding
-things, another has his--who can say which is correct? All we can do
-is, what seems a hopeless task enough--we can try to show how these
-unrelated particulars seem by repetition to produce an illusionary
-connection in our minds.
-
-Both mind and matter appear, then, to be wanting, and experience alone
-is suggested as the means of solving the difficulty in which we are
-placed--a point in the argument which left an opportunity open to Kant
-to suggest a new development, to ask whether things being found
-inadequate in producing knowledge, we might not ask if knowledge could
-not be more successful with things. But it is the Scottish lines of
-attempted solution that we wish to follow out, and not the German.
-Perhaps they are not so very different.
-
-Philosophy, as Reid found it, was in a bad way enough, as far as the
-orthodox mind of Scotland was concerned. All justification for belief
-in God, in immortality, in all that was held sacred in a century of
-much orthodoxy if little zeal, was gone. Such things might be believed
-in by those who found any comfort in so believing, but to the educated
-man who had seriously reflected on them, they were anachronisms. The
-very desperateness of the case, however, seemed to promise a remedy.
-Men could not rest in a state of permanent scepticism, in a world
-utterly incapable of being rationally explained. Even the propounder of
-the theories allowed this to be true; and as for others, they felt that
-they were rational beings, and this signified that there was system in
-the world.
-
-A champion arose when things were at their worst in Thomas Reid, the
-founder, or at least the chiefest ornament, of the so-called Scottish
-School of Philosophy. He it was who set himself to add the principle of
-the coherence of the Universe, and the consequent possibility of
-establishing Faith once more in the world. Reid, to begin with, instead
-of looking at Hume's results as serious, regarded them as necessarily
-absurd. He started a new theory of his own, the theory of Immediate
-Perception, which signified that we are able immediately to
-apprehend--not ideas only, but the Truth. And how, we may ask, can this
-be done?
-
-It had been pointed out first of all that sensations as understood by
-Locke--that is, the relations so called by Locke--might be separated
-from sensation in itself; in fact, that these first pertained to mind.
-Hence we have a dualistic system given us to start with, and the
-question is how the two sides are to be connected? What does this
-theory of Immediate Perception, which Reid puts forward as the
-solution, mean? Is it just a mechanical union of two antitheses, or is
-it something more?
-
-As to this last, perhaps the real answer would be that it both is, and
-is not. That is, the philosophy of Reid would seem still dualistic in
-its nature; it certainly implies the mechanical contact of two
-confronting substances whose independence is vigorously maintained, in
-opposition to the idealistic system which it superseded; but in
-reference to Reid we must recollect that his theory of Immediate
-Perception was also something more. As regards sensation, for example,
-he says that we do not begin with unrelated sensations, but with
-judgment--that is, we refer our sensations to a permanent subject, 'I.'
-Sensations 'suggest' the nature of a mind and the belief in its
-existence. And this signifies that we have the power of making
-inferences--how we do not exactly know, but we believe it to be, not by
-any special reasoning process, but by the 'common-sense' innately born
-within us. Common-sense is responsible for a good deal more--for the
-conceptions of existence and of cause, for instance; for Reid
-acknowledges that sensations alone must fail to account for ideas such
-as those of extension, space, and motion. This standpoint seems indeed
-as if it did not differ widely from the Kantian, but at the same time
-Reid appears to think that it is not an essential that feelings should
-be perceptively referred to an external object; the first part of the
-process of perception is carried on without our consciousness--the
-mental sensation merely follows--and sensation simply supposes a
-sentient being and a certain manner in which that being is affected,
-which leaves us much where we were, as far as the subjectivity of our
-ideas is concerned. He does not hold that all sensation is a percept
-involving extension and much else--involving, indeed, existence.
-
-Following upon Reid, Dugald Stewart obtained a very considerable
-reputation, and he was living and writing at the time Ferrier was a
-young man. His main idea would, however, seem to have been to guard his
-utterances carefully, and enter upon no keen discussions or
-contentions: when a bold assertion is made, it is always under shelter
-of some good authority. But his rounded phrases gained him considerable
-admiration, as such writing often does. He carried--perhaps
-inadvertently--Reid's views farther than he would probably have held as
-justifiable. He says we are not, properly speaking, conscious of self
-or the existence of self, but merely of a sensation or some other
-quality, which, by a _subsequent suggestion_ of the understanding,
-leads to a belief in that which exercises the quality. This is the
-doctrine of Reid put very crudely, and in a manner calculated to bring
-us back to unrelated sensation in earnest. Stewart adopted a new
-expression for Reid's 'common-sense,' _i.e._ the 'fundamental laws of
-belief,' which might be less ambiguous, but never took popular hold as
-did the first.
-
-There were many others belonging to this school besides Reid and
-Stewart, whom it would be impossible to speak of here. The Scottish
-Philosophy had its work to do, and no doubt understood that work--the
-first essential in a criticism: it endeavoured to vindicate perception
-as against sensational idealism, and it only partially succeeded in its
-task. But we must be careful not to forget that it opened up the way
-for a more comprehensive and satisfactory point of view. It was with
-Kant that the distinction arose between sensation and the forms
-necessary to its perception, the form of space and time, and so on. As
-to this part of the theory of knowledge, Reid and his school were not
-clear; they only made an effort to express the fact that something was
-required to verify our knowledge, but they were far from satisfactorily
-attaining to their goal. The very name of 'common-sense' was
-misleading--making people imagine, as it did, that there was nothing in
-philosophy after all that the man in the street could not know by
-applying the smallest modicum of reflection to the subject. Philosophy
-thus came to be considered as superfluous, and it was thought that the
-sooner we got rid of it and were content to observe the mandates of our
-hearts, the better for all concerned.
-
-What, then, was the work which Ferrier placed before himself when he
-commenced to write upon and teach philosophy? He was thoroughly and
-entirely dissatisfied with the old point of view, the point of view of
-the 'common-sense' school of metaphysicians, to begin with. Sometimes
-it seems as though we could not judge a system altogether from the best
-exponent of it, although theoretically we are always bound to turn to
-him. In a national philosophy, at least, we want something that will
-wear, that will bear to be put in ordinary language, something which
-can be understood of the people, which can be assimilated with the
-popular religion and politics--in fact, which can really be _lived_ as
-well as thought; and it is only after many years of use that we can
-really tell whether these conditions have been fulfilled. For this
-reason we are in some measure justified in taking the popular estimate
-of a system, and in considering its practical results as well as the
-value of its theory. Now, the commonly accepted view of the
-eighteenth-century philosophers in Scotland is that there is nothing
-very wonderful about the subject--like the _Bourgeois Gentilhomme_ of
-Molière, we are shown that we have been philosophising all our lives,
-only we never knew it. 'Common-sense'--an attribute with which we all
-believe we are in some small measure endowed--explains everything if we
-simply exercise it, and that is open to us all: there has been much
-talk, it would seem, about nothing; secrets hidden to wise men are
-revealed to babes, and we have but to keep our minds open in order to
-receive them.
-
-We are all acquainted with this talk in speculative regions of
-knowledge, but we most of us also know how disastrous it is to any true
-advancement in such directions. What happens now is just what happened
-in the eighteenth century. Men relapse into a self-satisfied indolence
-of mind: in religion they are content with believing in a sort of
-general divine Beneficence which will somehow make matters straight,
-however crooked they may seem to be; and in philosophy they are guided
-by their instincts, which teach them that what they wish to believe is
-true.
-
-Now, all this is what Ferrier and the modern movement, largely
-influenced by German modes of thought, wish to protest against with all
-their might. The scepticism of Hume and Gibbon was logical, if utterly
-impossible as a working creed and necessarily ending in absurdity; but
-this irrational kind of optimism was altogether repugnant to those who
-demanded a reasonable explanation of themselves and of their place in
-nature. The question had become summed up in one of superlative
-importance, namely, the distinction that existed between the natural
-and supernatural sides of our existence. The materialistic school had
-practically done away with the latter in its entirety, had said that
-nature is capable of being explained by mechanical means, and that
-these must necessarily suffice for us. But the orthodox section adopted
-other lines; it accepted all the ordinarily received ideas of God,
-immortality, and the like, but it maintained the existence of an
-Absolute which can only be inferred, but not presented to the mind,
-and, strangest of all, declared that the 'last and highest consecration
-of all true religion must be an altar "To the unknown and unknowable
-God."'[6] This so-called 'pious' philosophy declares that 'To think
-that God is, as we can think Him to be, is blasphemy,' and 'A God
-understood would be no God at all.' The German philosophy saw that if
-once we are to renounce our reason, or trust to it only within a
-certain sphere, all hope for us is lost, as far as withstanding the
-attack of outside enemies is concerned. We are liable to sceptical
-attacks from every side, and all we can maintain against them is a
-personal conviction which is not proof. How, then, was the difficulty
-met?
-
- [6] _Philosophy of the Unconditioned_ (Sir William
- Hamilton), p. 15.
-
-Kant, as we have said, made an important development upon the position
-of Hume. Hume had arrived at the point of declaring the particular mind
-and matter equally incompetent to afford an ultimate explanation of
-things, and he suggested experience in their place. This is the first
-note of the new philosophy: experience, not a process of the
-interaction of two separate things, mind on the one hand, matter on the
-other, but something comprehending both. This, however, was scarcely
-realised either by Hume or Kant, though the latter came very near the
-formulation of it. Kant saw, at least, that things could not produce
-knowledge, and he therefore changed his front and suggested starting
-with the knowledge that was before regarded as result--a change in
-point of view that caused a revolution in thought similar to that
-caused in our ideas of the natural world by the introduction of the
-system of Copernicus. Still, while following out his Copernican theory,
-Kant did not go far enough. His methods were still somewhat
-psychological in nature. He still regarded thought as something which
-can be separated from the thinker; he still maintained the existence of
-things in themselves independent and outside of thought. He gives us a
-'theory' of knowledge, when what we want to reach is knowledge itself,
-and not a subjective conception of it.
-
-Here it is that the Absolute Idealism comes in--the Idealism most
-associated with the name of Hegel. Hegel takes experience, knowledge,
-or thought, in another and much more comprehensive fashion than did his
-predecessors. Knowledge, in fact, is all-comprehending; it embraces
-both sides in itself, and explains them as 'moments,' _i.e._
-complementary factors in the one Reality. To make this clearer: we have
-been all along taking knowledge as a dualistic process, as having two
-sides involved in it, a subject and an object. Now, Hegel says our
-mistake is this: we cannot make a separation of such a kind except by a
-process of abstraction: the one really implies the other, and could not
-possibly exist without it. We may in our ordinary pursuits do so,
-without doubt; we may concentrate our attention on one side or the
-other, as the case may be; we may look at the world as if it could be
-explained by mechanical means, as, indeed, to a certain point it can.
-But, Hegel says, these explanations are not sufficient; they can easily
-be shown to be untrue, when driven far enough: the world is something
-larger; it has the ideal side as well as the real, and, as we are
-placed, they are both necessarily there, and must both be recognised,
-if we are to attain to true conceptions.
-
-Without saying that Ferrier wholly assimilated the modern German
-view,--for of course he did not,--he was clearly largely influenced by
-it, more largely perhaps than he was even himself aware. It
-particularly met the present difficulties with which he was confronted.
-The negative attitude was felt to be impossible, and the other, the
-Belief which then, as now, was so strongly advocated, the Belief which
-meant a more or less blind acceptance of a spiritual power beyond our
-own, the Belief in the God we cannot know and glory in not being able
-so to know, he felt to be an equal impossibility. Ferrier, and many
-others, asked the question, Are these alternatives exhaustive? Can we
-not have a rational explanation of the world and of ourselves? Can we
-not, that is, attain to freedom? The new point of view seemed in some
-measure to meet the difficulty, and therefore it was looked to with
-hope and anticipation even although its bearing was not at first
-entirely comprehended. Ferrier was one of those who perceived the
-momentous consequences which such a change of front would cause, and he
-set himself to work it out as best he could. In an interesting paper
-which he writes on 'The Philosophy of Common-Sense,' with special
-reference to Sir William Hamilton's edition of the works of Dr. Reid,
-we see in what way his opinions had developed.
-
-The point which Ferrier made the real crux of the whole question of
-philosophy was the distinction which exists between the ordinary
-psychological doctrine of perception and the metaphysical. The former
-drew a distinction between the perceiving mind and matter, and based
-its reasonings on the assumed modification of our minds brought about
-by matter regarded as self-existent, _i.e._ existent in itself and
-without regard to any perceiving mind. Now, Ferrier points out that
-this system of 'representationalism,' of representative ideas,
-necessarily leads to scepticism; for who can tell us more, than that we
-have certain ideas--that is, how can it be known that the real matter
-supposed to cause them has any part at all in the process? Scepticism,
-as we saw before, has the way opened up for it, and it doubts the
-existence of matter, seeing that it has been given no reasonable
-grounds for belief in it, while Idealism boldly denies its
-instrumentality and existence. What then, he asks, of Dr. Reid and his
-School of Common-Sense? Reid cannot say that matter is known in
-consciousness, but what he does say is that something innately born
-within us forces us to believe in its existence. But then, as Ferrier
-pertinently points out, scepticism and idealism do not merely doubt and
-deny the existence of a self-existent matter as an object of
-consciousness, but also because it is no object of belief. And what has
-Reid to show for his beliefs? Nothing but his word. We must all,
-Ferrier says, be sceptics or idealists; we are all forced on to deny
-that matter in any form exists, for it is only self-existent matter
-that we recognise as psychologists. Stewart tries to reinstate it by an
-appeal to 'direct observation,' an appeal which, Ferrier truly says, is
-manifestly absurd; reasoning is useless, and we must, it would appear,
-allow any efforts we might make towards rectifying our position to be
-recognised as futile.
-
-But now, Ferrier says, the metaphysical solution of the problem comes
-in. We are in an _impasse_, it would appear; the analysis of the given
-fact is found impossible. But the failure of psychology opens up the
-way to metaphysic. 'The turning-round of thought from psychology to
-metaphysic is the true interpretation of the Platonic conversion of the
-soul from ignorance to knowledge, from mere opinion to certainty and
-satisfaction; in other words, from a discipline in which the thinking
-is only _apparent_, to a discipline in which the thinking is _real_.'
-'The difference is as great between "the science of the human mind" and
-metaphysic, as it is between the Ptolemaic and the Copernican
-astronomy, and it is very much of the same kind.' It is not that
-metaphysic proposes to do _more_ than psychology; it aims at nothing
-but what it can fully overtake, and does not propose to carry a man
-farther than his tether extends, or the surroundings in which he finds
-himself. Metaphysic in the hands of all true astronomers of thought,
-from Plato to Hegel, if it accomplishes more, attempts less.
-
-Metaphysic, Ferrier says, demands the whole given fact, and that fact
-is summed up in this: 'We apprehend the perception of an object,' and
-nothing short of this suffices--that is, not the perception of matter,
-but our apprehension of that perception, or what we before called
-knowledge, ultimate knowledge in its widest sense. And this given fact
-is unlike the mere perception of matter, for it is capable of analysis
-and is not simply subjective and egoistic. Psychology recognises
-perception on the one hand (subjective), and matter on the other
-(objective), but metaphysic says the distinction ought to be drawn
-between 'our apprehension' and 'the perception-of-matter,' the latter
-being one fact and indivisible, and on no account to be taken as two
-separate facts or thoughts. The whole point is, that by no possible
-means can the perception-of-matter be divided into two facts or
-existences, as was done by psychology. And Ferrier goes on to point out
-that this is not a subjective idealism, it is not a condition of the
-human soul alone, but it 'dwells apart, a mighty and independent
-system, a city fitted up and upheld by the living God.' And in
-authenticating this last belief Ferrier calls in internal convictions,
-'common-sense,' to assist the evidence of speculative reason, where,
-had he followed more upon the lines of the great German Idealists, he
-might have done without it.
-
-Now, Ferrier continues, we are safe against the cavils of scepticism;
-the metaphysical theory of perception steers clear of all the
-perplexities of representationalism; for it gives us in perception one
-only object, the perception of matter; the objectivity of this _datum_
-keeps us clear from subjective idealism.
-
-From the perception of matter, a fact in which man merely participates,
-Ferrier infers a Divine mind, of which perceptions are the property:
-they are states of the everlasting intellect. The exercise of the
-senses is the condition upon which we are permitted to apprehend or
-participate in the objective perception of material things. This,
-shortly, is the position from which he starts.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IV
-
-'FIERCE WARRES AND FAITHFUL LOVES'
-
-
-'If Ferrier's life should be written hereafter,' said one, who knew and
-valued him, just after his death,[7] 'let his biographer take for its
-motto these five words from the _Faery Queen_ which the biographer of
-the Napiers has so happily chosen.' Ferrier's life was not, what it
-perhaps seems, looking back on its comparatively uneventful course,
-consistently calm and placid,--a life such as is commonly supposed to
-befit those who soar into lofty speculative heights, and find the
-'difficult air' in which they dwell suited to their contemplative
-temperaments. Ferrier was intrepid and daring in his reasoning; a sort
-of free lance, Dr. Skelton says he was considered in orthodox
-philosophical circles; a High Tory in politics, yet one who did not
-hesitate to probe to the bottom the questions which came before him,
-even though the task meant changing the whole attitude of mind from
-which he started. And once sure of his point, Ferrier never hesitated
-openly to declare it. What he hated most of all was 'laborious dulness
-and consecrated feebleness'; commonplace orthodoxy was repugnant to him
-in the extreme, and possibly few things gave him more sincere pleasure
-than violently to combat it. The fighting instinct is proper to most
-men who have 'stuff' in them, and Ferrier in spite of his slight and
-delicately made frame was manly to the core. But, as the same writer
-says, 'though combative over his books and theories, his nature was
-singularly pure, affectionate, and tolerant. He loved his friends even
-better than he hated his foes. His prejudices were invincible; but,
-apart from his prejudices, his mind was open and receptive--prepared to
-welcome truth from whatever quarter it came.' Such a keen, eager nature
-was sure to be in the fray if battle had to be fought, and we think
-none the worse of him for that. Battles of intellect are not less keen
-than battles of physical strength, and much more daring and subtlety
-may be called into play in the fighting of them; and Ferrier, refined,
-sensitive, fastidious, as he was, had his battles to fight, and fought
-them with an eagerness and zeal almost too great for the object he had
-in view.
-
- [7] The late Sir John Skelton, K.C.B.
-
-After his marriage in 1837, Ferrier devoted his attention almost
-entirely to the philosophy he loved so well. He did not succeed--did
-not perhaps try to succeed--at the Bar, to which he had been called.
-Many qualities are required by a successful advocate besides the subtle
-mind and acute reasoning powers which Ferrier undoubtedly possessed:
-possibly--we might almost say probably--these could have been
-cultivated had he made the effort. He had, to begin with, a fair junior
-counsel's practice, owing to his family connections, and this might
-have been easily developed; his ambition, however, did not soar in the
-direction of the law courts, and he did not give that whole-hearted
-devotion to the subject which is requisite if success is to follow the
-efforts of the novice. But if he was not attracted by the work at the
-Parliament House, he was attracted elsewhere; and to his first
-mistress, Philosophy, none could be more faithful. In other lines, it
-is true, he read much and deeply: literature in its widest sense
-attracted him as it would attract any educated man. Poetry, above all,
-he loved, in spite of the tale sometimes told against him, that he
-gravely proposed turning _In Memoriam_ into prose in order to ascertain
-logically 'whether its merits were sustained by reason as well as by
-rhyme'--a proposition which is said greatly to have entertained its
-author, when related to him by a mutual friend. Works of imagination he
-delighted in--all spheres of literature appealed to him; he had the
-sense of form which is denied to many of his craft; he wrote in a style
-at once brilliant and clear, and carelessness on this score in some of
-the writings of his countrymen irritated him, as those sensitive to
-such things are irritated. He has often been spoken of as a living
-protest against the materialism of the age, working away in the quiet,
-regardless of the busy throng, without its ambitions and its cares.
-Sometimes, of course, he temporarily deserted the work he loved the
-best for regions less remote; sometimes he consented to lecture on
-purely literary topics, and often he wrote biographies for a
-dictionary, or articles or reviews for _Blackwood's Edinburgh
-Magazine_. As it was to this serial that Ferrier made his most
-important contributions, both philosophic and literary, for the next
-fifteen years, and as it was in its pages that the development of his
-system may be traced, a few words about its history may not be out of
-place, although it is a history with which we have every reason to be
-familiar now.
-
-About 1816 the _Edinburgh Review_ reigned supreme in literature. What
-was most strange, however, was that the Conservative party, so strong
-in politics, had no literary organ of their own--and this at a time
-when the line of demarcation between the rival sides in politics was so
-fixed that no virtue could be recognised in an opponent or in an
-opponent's views, even though they were held regarding matters quite
-remote from politics. The Whig party, though in a minority politically
-and socially, represented a minority of tremendous power, and possessed
-latent capabilities which soon broke forth into action. At this time,
-for instance, they had literary ability of a singularly marked
-description; they were not bound down by traditions as were their
-opponents, and were consequently much more free to strike out lines of
-their own, always of course under the guidance of that past-master in
-criticism, Francis Jeffrey. Although his words were received as
-oracular by his friends, this dictatorship in matters of literary taste
-was naturally extremely distasteful to those who differed from him,
-especially as the influence it exerted was not a local or national
-influence alone, but one which affected the opinion of the whole United
-Kingdom. For a time, no doubt, the party was so strong that the matter
-was not taken as serious, but it soon became evident that a strenuous
-effort must be made if affairs were to be placed on a better footing,
-and if a protest were to be raised against the cynical criticism in
-which the Reviewers indulged. Consequently, in April 1817, a literary
-periodical called the _Edinburgh Monthly Magazine_ was started by two
-gentlemen of some experience in literary matters, with the assistance
-of Mr. William Blackwood, an enterprising Edinburgh publisher, whose
-reputation had grown of recent years to considerable dimensions. This
-magazine was not a great success: the editors and publisher did not
-agree, and finally Mr. Blackwood purchased the formers' share in it,
-took over the magazine himself, and, to make matters clear, gave it his
-name; thus in October of the same year the first number of _Blackwood's
-Edinburgh Magazine_ appeared. From a quiet and unobtrusive 'Miscellany'
-the magazine developed into a strongly partisan periodical, with a
-brilliant array of young contributors, determined to oppose the
-_Edinburgh Review_ régime with all its might, and not afraid to speak
-its mind respecting the literary gods of the day. Every month some one
-came under the lash; Coleridge, Leigh Hunt, and many others were dealt
-with in terms unmeasured in their severity, and in the very first
-number appeared the famous 'Chaldee Manuscript' which made the hair of
-Edinburgh society stand on end with horror. In spite of the immoderate
-expression of its opinions, the magazine flourished--it was fresh and
-novel, and much genius was enlisted in writing for its pages. The
-editor's identity was always matter for conjecture; but though the
-contributors included a number of distinguished men, such as Mackenzie,
-De Quincey, Hogg, Fraser Tytler, and Jameson, there were two names
-which were always associated with the periodical--those of John Gibson
-Lockhart and Ferrier's uncle and father-in-law, John Wilson. The latter
-in particular was often held to be the real editor whom everyone was so
-anxious to discover, but this belief has been emphatically denied.
-Although the management might appear to be in the control of a
-triumvirate, Blackwood himself kept the supreme power in his hands,
-whatever he might at times find it politic to lead outsiders to infer.
-
-When Ferrier began to write for it in 1838, _Blackwood's Magazine_ was
-not of course the same fiery publication of twenty years before; nor
-were Ferrier's articles for the most part of a nature such as to appeal
-strongly to an excitable and partisan public. Things had changed much
-since 1817: the Reform Bill had passed; the politics of the country
-were very different; the Toryism of Ferrier and his friends was quite
-unlike the Toryism of the early part of the century: it more resembled
-the Conservatism or Traditionalism of a yet later date, which objected
-to violent changes only owing to their violence, and by no means to
-reform, if gradually carried out. This policy was reflected in _Maga's_
-pages, to which Ferrier would naturally turn when he wished to reach
-the public ear, both from family association and hereditary politics.
-His first contribution was certainly not light in character; nor did it
-resemble the 'bright, racy' articles which are supposed to be the
-requisite for modern serial publications. The subject was 'An
-Introduction to the Philosophy of Consciousness,' and it consisted of a
-series of papers contributed during two successive years (1838 and
-1839), which really embodied the result of the work in which Ferrier
-had during the past few years been engaged, and signified a complete
-divergence from the accepted manner of regarding consciousness, and a
-protest against the 'faith-philosophy' which it became Ferrier's
-special mission to combat. Perhaps it is only in Scotland that a public
-could be found sufficiently interested in speculative questions to make
-them the subject of interest to a fairly wide and general circle, such
-as would be likely to peruse the pages of a monthly magazine like
-Blackwood's. But of this interesting contribution to metaphysical
-speculation, in which Ferrier commenced his philosophical career by
-grappling with the deepest and most fundamental questions in a manner,
-as Hamilton acknowledges, hitherto unattempted in the humbler
-speculations of this country, we shall speak later on, as also of his
-further contributions to the magazine.
-
-In the year 1821, Sir William Hamilton had been a candidate for the
-Chair of Moral Philosophy along with John Wilson, Ferrier's future
-father-in-law. In spite of Wilson's literary gifts, there is probably
-no question that of the two his opponent was best qualified to teach
-the subject, owing to the greatness of his philosophical attainments
-and the profundity of his learning. But in the temper of the time the
-merits of the candidates could not be calmly weighed by the Town
-Council, the electing body; and Hamilton was a Whig, and a Whig
-contributor to that atheistical and Jacobin _Edinburgh Review_, and was
-therefore on no account to be elected. The disappointment to Hamilton
-was great; but it was slightly salved by his subsequent election--to
-their credit be it said, for Whig principles were far from popular
-among them--by the Faculty of Advocates to a chair rendered vacant in
-1821 by the resignation of Professor Fraser Tytler--the Chair of Civil
-History. In 1836, however, Sir William's merits at length received
-their reward, and he became the Professor of Logic and Metaphysics.
-When Ferrier probably felt the need of some more lucrative form of
-employment, he applied for the Chair of History once occupied by
-Hamilton, and rendered vacant by the resignation of Professor Skene; he
-obtained the appointment in 1842, and held it for four years
-subsequently. Large remuneration it certainly did not bring with it,
-but the duties were comparatively and correspondingly light.[8] Indeed,
-as attendance was not required of students studying for the degrees in
-Arts, or for any of the professions, the difficulty was to form a
-regular class at all. The salary paid to Sir William was £100 a year,
-and even this small sum was apparently only to be obtained with
-difficulty. The main advantage of holding the chair at all was the
-prospect it held out of succeeding later on to some more important
-office. Of Ferrier's class-work at this time we know but little. The
-reading requisite for the post was likely to prove useful in later
-days, and could not have been uncongenial; but probably in a class
-sometimes formed--if tradition speak aright--of one solitary student,
-the work of preparation would not be taken very seriously. Anyhow,
-there was plenty of time left to pursue his philosophic studies; and in
-1844-45, when Sir William Hamilton came so near to death, Ferrier acted
-as his substitute, and carried on his classes with zeal and with
-success--a success which was warmly acknowledged by the Professor. Of
-course, though he conducted the examinations and other class-work,
-Ferrier merely read the lectures written by Hamilton; else there might,
-one would fancy, be found to be a lack of continuity between the
-deliverances of the two staunch friends but uncompromising opponents.
-Any differences of opinion made, however, no difference in their
-friendship. The distress of Ferrier on his friend's sudden paralytic
-seizure has already been described; to his affectionate nature it was
-no small thing that one for whom he had so deep a regard came so very
-near death's door. Every Sunday while in Edinburgh, he spent the
-afternoon in walking with his friend and in talking of the subjects
-which most interested both.
-
- [8] There was a movement amongst the students to secure the
- chair for Thomas Carlyle, then coming into fame amongst
- them; but Ferrier was chosen by the patrons, the Faculty of
- Advocates.
-
-Of these early days Professor Fraser writes:--'My personal intercourse
-with Ferrier was very infrequent, but very delightful when it did
-occur. He was surely the most picturesque figure among the Scottish
-philosophers--easy, graceful, humorous, eminently subtle, and with a
-fine literary faculty--qualities not conspicuous in most of them. When
-I was a private member of Sir W. Hamilton's advanced class in
-metaphysics in 1838-39, and for some years after, I was often at Sir
-William's house, and Ferrier was sometimes of the party on these
-occasions. I remember his kindly familiarity with us students, the
-interest and sympathy with which he entered into metaphysical
-discussion, his help and co-operation in a metaphysical society which
-we were endeavouring to organise. His essays on the Philosophy of
-Consciousness were then being issued in _Blackwood_, and were felt to
-open questions strange at a time when speculation was almost dead in
-Scotland--Reid at a discount, Brown found empty, and Hamilton, with
-Kant, only struggling into ascendency.
-
-'In these days, if I remember right, Ferrier lived in Carlton Street,
-Stockbridge--an advocate whose interest was all in letters and
-philosophy, a student of simple habits, fond of German, not a
-conspicuous talker, of easy polished manners and fond of a joke, with a
-scientific interest in all sorts of facts and their meanings, and
-perhaps a disposition to paradox. I remember the interest he took in
-phenomena of "mesmeric sleep," as it was called. An eminent student was
-sometimes induced for experiment to submit himself to mesmeric
-influence at these now far-off evening gatherings at Sir William's. To
-Ferrier the phenomena suggested curious speculation, but I think
-without scientific result.' The subject was one on which Ferrier
-afterwards wrote in _Blackwood_, and it was a subject which always had
-the deepest interest for him. It, however, as he believed, cost him the
-friendship of Professor Cairns, a frequent subject at these informal
-séances, and one whom Ferrier rashly twitted for what he evidently
-regarded as a weakness, his easily accomplished subjection to the
-application of mesmeric power.
-
-In 1845 the Chair of Moral Philosophy in the University of St. Andrews,
-then occupied by Dr. Cook, and once held by Dr. Chalmers, became vacant
-by the former's death, and Ferrier entered as a candidate. Highly
-recommended as he was by Hamilton and others, Ferrier was the
-successful applicant, and St. Andrews became his home for nineteen
-years thereafter, or until his death in 1864.
-
-Such is a bald statement of the facts of what would seem a singularly
-uneventful life. Life divided between the study, library, and
-classroom, there was little room for incident outside the ordinary
-incidents of domestic and academic routine. Yet Ferrier never sank into
-the conventionality which life in a small University town might induce.
-His interests were always fresh; he was constantly engaged in writing
-and rewriting his lectures, which, unlike some of his calling, he was
-not content to read and re-read from year to year unaltered. His
-thoughts were constantly on his subject and on his students, planning
-how best to communicate to them the knowledge that he was endeavouring
-to convey--a life which came as near the ideal of philosophic devotion
-as is perhaps possible in this nineteenth century of turmoil and
-unrest. Still, gentleman and man of culture as he was, Ferrier had a
-fighting side as well, and that side was once or twice aroused in all
-the vehemence of its native strength.
-
-Twice Ferrier made application for a philosophical chair in the town of
-his birth and boyhood. In 1852, when his father-in-law, John Wilson,
-retired, he became a candidate for the professorship of Moral
-Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh; and then again, in 1856, he
-offered himself as a successor to Sir William Hamilton as Professor of
-Logic and Metaphysics. On neither occasion was he successful, and on
-both occasions he suffered much from calumnious statements respecting
-his 'German' and unorthodox views--a kind of calumny which is more than
-likely to arise and carry weight when the judges are men of honourable
-character but of little education, men to whom a shibboleth is
-everything and real progress in learning nothing. On the first occasion
-there were several candidates who submitted their applications, but on
-Professor M'Cosh's retiring from the combat, the two who were 'in the
-running' were Professor Ferrier of St. Andrews and Professor Macdougall
-of the Free Church College in Edinburgh. It is curious, as instancing
-the strange change which had come over the politics of Scotland since
-the Reform Act had passed, that the very influences that told in favour
-of John Wilson in applying for a professorship in 1821 should thirty
-years later tell as strongly against his son-in-law. In 1852, nine
-years after the Disruption, so greatly had matters altered, that the
-Free Church liberal party carried all before it in the Corporation. And
-although the liberal journals of the earlier date were never tired of
-maintaining liberty of thought and action, yet when circumstances
-changed, the liberty appeared in a somewhat different light; and the
-qualification of being a Whig was added to a considerable number of
-appointments both in the Church and in the State. Professor Macdougall,
-Ferrier's opponent, had held his professorship in the Free Church
-College, lately established for the teaching of theology and
-preparation of candidates for the ministry. On the establishment of the
-College, the subject of Moral Philosophy was considered to be one which
-should be taught elsewhere than in an 'Erastian' University, and
-accordingly it was thought necessary to institute the chair occupied by
-Professor Macdougall. In the first instance the class was eminently
-successful in point of numbers, and the corresponding class in the
-University proportionately suffered; but as time went on the attendance
-in the Free Church class dwindled, and it was considered that this
-chair need not be continued, but that students might be permitted to
-attend at the University. When Professor Macdougall now offered himself
-as candidate for the University chair, there was of course an immediate
-outcry of a 'job.' Rightly or wrongly it was said, 'Let the Free Church
-have a Professor of her own body and opinions if she will, but why
-force him upon the Established Church as well; are her country and
-ministers to be indoctrinated with Voluntary principles?' There might
-not have been much force in the argument had the status of the two
-candidates been the same, but it was evident to all unprejudiced
-observers that this was far from being the case. And it could hardly be
-pleaded in justification of the Council's action that they formed their
-judgment upon the testimonials laid before them; for Ferrier's far
-exceeded his rival's in weight, if not in strength of expression, and
-included in their number communications from such men as Sir William
-Hamilton, De Quincey, Bulwer, Alison, and Lockhart--men the most
-distinguished of the age. De Quincey's opinion of Ferrier is worth
-quoting. He says that he regards him as 'the metaphysician of greatest
-promise among his contemporaries either in England or in Scotland,' and
-the testimonial which at this time he accorded Ferrier is as remarkable
-a document as is often produced on such occasions, when commonplace
-would usually appear to be the object aimed at. It is several pages in
-length, and goes fully into the question not only of what Ferrier was,
-but also of what a candidate ought to be. De Quincey speaks warmly of
-Ferrier's services in respect of the English rendering of _Faust_
-before alluded to, and points out the benefit there is in having had an
-education which has run along two separate paths--paths differing from
-one another in nature, doubtless, but integrating likewise--the one
-being that resulting from his intercourse with Wilson and his literary
-coterie, the other that of the course of study he had pursued on German
-lines. He sums up Ferrier's philosophic qualities by saying, 'Out of
-Germany, and comparing him with the men of his own generation, such at
-least as I had any means of estimating, Mr. Ferrier was the only man
-who exhibited much of true metaphysical subtlety, as contrasted with
-mere dialectical acuteness.' For this testimonial, we may incidentally
-mention, Ferrier writes a most interesting letter of thanks, which is
-published in his _Remains_. As a return for the kindness done him, he
-'sets forth a slight chart of the speculative latitudes' he had
-reached, and which he 'expects to navigate without being
-wrecked'--really an admirably clear epitome in so short a space of the
-argument of the _Institutes_.
-
-But to come back to the contest: in spite of testimonials, the fact
-remained that Ferrier had studied German philosophy, and might have
-imbibed some German infidelity, while his opponent made no professions
-of being acquainted either with the German philosophy or language,
-besides having the advantage of being a Liberal and Free Churchman; and
-he was consequently appointed to the chair. Of course, there was an
-outcry. The election was put forward as an argument against the
-abolition of Tests, though in this case Ferrier, as an Episcopalian,
-might be said to be a Dissenter equally with his opponent. It was
-argued that the election should be set aside unless the necessary
-subscription were made before the Presbytery of the bounds. For a
-century back such tests had not been exacted as far as the Moral
-Philosophy chair was concerned, nor would they probably have been so
-had Ferrier himself been nominated. But though the Presbytery concerned
-was in this case prepared to go all lengths, it appeared that it was
-not in its members that the initiative was vested, the practice being
-to take the oath before the Lord Provost or other authorised
-magistrate. Consequently, indignant at discovering their impotence, the
-members of the body retaliated by declaring that they would divert past
-the new Professor's class the students who should afterwards come
-within their jurisdiction, and thus, by their foolish action, they
-probably did their best to bring about the result they deprecated so
-much--the abolition of Tests in their entirety.
-
-Ecclesiastical feeling ran high at the time, and things were said and
-done on both sides which were far from being wise or prudent. But the
-effect on a sensitive nature like Ferrier's is easy to imagine. This
-was the first blow he had met with, and being the first he did not take
-it quite so seriously to heart. But when it was followed years later by
-yet another repulse, signifying to his view an attitude of mind in
-orthodox Scotland opposed to any liberty of thought amongst its
-teachers, Ferrier felt the day for silence was ended, and, wisely or
-unwisely, he published a hot defence of his position in a pamphlet
-entitled _Scottish Philosophy, the Old and the New_. On this occasion
-the question had risen above the mere discussion of Church and Tests;
-the whole future of philosophy in Scotland was, he believed, at stake;
-it was time, he felt, that someone should speak out his mind, and who
-more suitable than the leader of the modern movement and the one, as he
-considered it, who had suffered most by his opinions?
-
-Without having lived through the time or seen something of its effects,
-it would be difficult to realise how narrow were the bounds allowed to
-speculative thought some forty years ago in Scotland. Since the old
-days of Moderatism and apathy there had, indeed, been a great revival
-of interest in such matters as concerned Belief. Men's convictions were
-intense and sincere; and what had once been a subject of convention and
-common usage, had now become the one important topic of their lives. So
-far the change was all for the good; it promoted many important
-virtues; it made men serious about serious things; it made them realise
-their responsibilities as human beings. But as those who lived through
-it, or saw the results it brought about, must also know, it had another
-side. A certain spiritual self-assurance sprang into existence, which,
-though it was bred of intense reality of conviction, brought with it
-consequences of a specially trying kind to those who did not altogether
-share in it. As so often happens when a new light dawns, men thought
-that to them at length _all_ truth had been revealed, and acted in
-accordance with this belief. They formulated their systems--hide-bound
-almost as before--and decided in their minds that in them they had the
-standards for judging of their fellows. But Truth is a strange
-will-o'-the-wisp after all,--when we think we have reached her, she has
-eluded our grasp,--and so when those rose up who said the end of the
-matter was not yet, a storm of indignation fell upon their heads. This
-is what happened with Ferrier and the orthodox Edinburgh world. There
-might, it was said by the latter, be men lax enough to listen to
-reasonings such as his, and even to agree with them, but for those who
-_knew_ the truth as it was in its reality, such pandering to
-latitudinarian doctrines was unpardonable. And as at this time the Town
-Council of Edinburgh was seriously inclined (some of the members, in
-the second instance, were the same as those who had adjudicated in the
-former contest), Ferrier's fate was, he considered, sealed before the
-question really came before them. Whether the matter was quite as
-serious as Ferrier thought, it is perhaps unnecessary to say. At
-anyrate, there was a considerable element of truth in the view he took
-of it, and he was justified in much--if not in all--of what he said in
-his defence. The _Institutes_, first published in 1854, had just
-reached a second edition, so that his views were fairly before the
-world. What caused the tremendous outburst of opposition we must take
-another chapter to consider; and then we must try to trace the course
-of Ferrier's development from the time at which he first began to write
-on philosophic subjects, and when he openly broke with the Scottish
-School of Philosophy.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER V
-
-DEVELOPMENT OF 'SCOTTISH PHILOSOPHY, THE OLD AND THE NEW'--FERRIER AS A
-CORRESPONDENT
-
-
-It is probably in the main a wise rule for defeated candidates to keep
-silence about the cause of their defeat. But every rule has its
-exception, and there are times in which we honour a man none the less
-because--contrary to the dictates of worldly wisdom--he gives voice to
-the sense of injustice that is rankling in his mind. Ferrier had been
-disappointed in 1852 in not obtaining the Chair of Moral Philosophy for
-which he was a candidate; but then he had not published the work which
-has made his name famous, and his claims were therefore not what
-afterwards they became. But when in 1856, after the _Institutes_ had
-been two years before the public, and just after the book had reached a
-second edition, another defeat followed on the first, Ferrier ascribed
-the result to the opposition to, and misrepresentation of, his system,
-and claimed with some degree of justice that it was not his merits that
-were taken into account, but the supposed orthodoxy, or want of
-orthodoxy, of his views. For this reason he issued a 'Statement' in
-pamphlet form, entitled _Scottish Philosophy, the Old and the New_,
-dealing with the matter at length.
-
-In Ferrier's view, a serious crisis had been arrived at in the history
-of the University of Edinburgh, and one which might lead to yet further
-evil were not something done to place matters on a better footing. Had
-the Town Council, the electing body, been affected simply by personal
-or sectarian feelings, it would not so much have mattered; but when
-Ferrier was forced to the conclusion that what they did must end in the
-curtailment of all liberty in regard to philosophical opinion, so far
-as the University was concerned, he felt the time had come to speak.
-For a quarter of a century he had devoted the best part of his life and
-energies to the study of philosophy, and he held he had a duty to
-discharge to it as one of the public instructors of the land. What
-cause, he asked, had a body like the Council to say originality was to
-be proscribed and independence utterly forbidden? Through their
-liberalism tests had been practically abolished: was another test, far
-more exacting than the last, to be substituted in their place? A
-candidate for a philosopher's chair need not be a believer in Christ or
-a member of the Established Church; but he must, it would appear,
-believe in Dr. Reid and the Hamiltonian system of philosophy.
-
-The 'common-sense' school, against which Ferrier's attacks were mainly
-directed, too often found its satisfaction in commonplace statements of
-obvious facts, and we cannot wonder that Ferrier should ask why
-Scottish students should be required to pay for 'bottled air' while the
-whole atmosphere is 'floating with liquid balm that could be had for
-nothing?'--a question, indeed, which cannot fail to strike whoever
-tries to wade through certain tedious dissertations of the time, all
-expressing truths which seem incontrovertible in their nature, but all
-of which are also inexpressibly uninteresting. Philosophy to Ferrier is
-not the elementary science that it would appear from these discourses:
-loose ways of thinking which we ordinarily adopt must, he considers, be
-rectified and not confirmed. And yet he disclaims the accusation that
-he has conjured with 'the portentous name of Hegel,' or derived his
-system from German soil. Hegel, he constantly confesses, is frequently
-to him inexplicable, and his system is Scottish to the core.
-
-A warm debt of gratitude to Hamilton, Ferrier, it is true, acknowledges
-even while he differs from his views--a debt to one whose 'soul could
-travel on eagles' wings,' and from whom he had learned so much--whom,
-indeed, he had loved so warmly. Hamilton had not agreed with Ferrier;
-he had thought him wrong, and told him so, and Ferrier was the last to
-resent this action, or think the less of him for not recanting at his
-word the conclusions of a lifetime's labour. Provocation, the younger
-man acknowledges, he had often given him, and 'never was such rough
-provocation retaliated with such gentle spleen.'
-
-But what most roused Ferrier's ire was, not the criticisms of men like
-Hamilton, but such as were contained in a pamphlet published by the
-Rev. Mr. Cairns of Berwick, afterwards Principal Cairns of the United
-Presbyterian College--a pamphlet which he believed had biassed the
-judgment of the electors in making their decision. We now know that
-indirectly they had requested Mr. Cairns's advice, and he, considering
-that orthodoxy was being seriously threatened by German rationalistic
-views, had formulated his indictment against Ferrier in the strongest
-possible terms. He believed that in Ferrier's writings there was an
-attempt to substitute formal demonstration of real existence for
-'belief,' thereby making faith of no effect; also that he denied the
-separate existence of the material world and the mind, and that (and
-probably this is the most serious count in the charge) the
-substantiality of the mind was subverted, and consequently belief in
-personal identity rendered impossible. He further said that by Ferrier
-absolute existence is reduced to a mere relation, and finally, that his
-conception of a Deity is inadequate, and metaphysics and natural
-theology are divorced.
-
-We cannot, of course, deal in detail with Ferrier's energetic
-repudiation of the accusation brought so specifically against him. The
-heat with which he wrote seems scarcely justified now that we look back
-on it from the standpoint of more than forty years ahead. But we do not
-realise how much such accusations meant at the time at which they were
-made--how they affected not a man's personal advancement only, but also
-the opinion in which he was held by those for whose opinion he cared
-the most. The greater toleration of the present day may mean
-corresponding lack of zeal or interest, but surely it also means a
-recognition of the fact that men may choose their own methods in the
-search for truth without thereby endangering the object held in view.
-Mr. Cairns's attack--without intention, for he was an honourable man
-and able scholar--was unjust. Ferrier does not claim to _prove_
-existence--he accepts it, and only reasons as to what it is; as to the
-material world, he acknowledges not a mere material world, but one
-along with which intelligence is and must be known; the separate
-existence of mind he likewise denies only in so far as to assert that
-mind without thought is nonsense. The substantiality of the mind he
-maintains as the one great permanent existence amid all fluctuations
-and contingencies, and without personal identity, he tells us, there
-can be no continued consciousness amid the changes of the unfluctuating
-existence called the 'I'--though in this regard one feels that
-something is left to say in criticism, from the orthodox point of view.
-Absolute existence is indeed reduced into relations, but into relations
-together constituting the truth, if contradictory in themselves; that
-is, a concrete, as distinguished from an abstract truth. As to the
-final accusation of the insufficiency of Ferrier's view of the Deity,
-it is true he states that the Deity is not independent of His creative
-powers, revelation and manifestation; but surely this is a worthier
-conception than the old one of the Unknown God, which tells us to
-worship we know not what.
-
-The pity is that in this publication, and another on very similar
-lines,[9] Ferrier allowed himself to turn from philosophical to
-personal criticism, and to say what he must afterwards have regretted.
-In the second edition of his first pamphlet these references were
-modified, and in any case they must be ascribed to the quick temper
-with which he was naturally endowed, and which led him to express his
-feelings more strongly than he should, rather than to deliberate
-judgment. No one was more sensible than he of the danger to which he
-was subject of allowing himself to be carried off his feet in the heat
-of argument. This is very clearly shown by a letter to a friend quoted
-in the _Remains_: 'One thing I would recommend, not to be too sharp in
-your criticism of others. No one has committed this fault oftener, or
-is more disposed to commit it than myself; but I am certain that it is
-not pleasing to the reader, and after an interval it is displeasing to
-oneself. In the heat and hurry of writing a lecture I often hit a
-brother philosopher as I think cleverly enough, but on coming to it
-coolly next year I very seldom repeat the passage.' An admission and
-acknowledgment which does a proud man like Ferrier credit.
-
- [9] _A Letter to the Lord Advocate on the Necessity of a
- Change in the Patronage of the University of Edinburgh._
-
-One cannot help speculating on the effect of the mass of criticism and
-counter-criticism (for there were others who took up the cudgels on
-either side, once the controversy was fairly started) upon the
-unfortunate Town Councillors of Edinburgh, to whom they were directed:
-one would imagine them to wish their powers curtailed if they were to
-involve their mastering several conflicting theories of existence, and
-forming a just judgment regarding their respective merits. The exercise
-of patronage is always a difficult and thankless task, but surely in no
-case could it have been more difficult than in this, and we can hardly
-wonder now that the electors simply took the advice of those they
-deemed most worthy to bestow it; certainly the candidate finally
-selected was one who did everything in the occupation of his chair to
-disarm the criticism then brought to bear upon the appointment. In
-cooler moments probably none would have been readier to admit this than
-was Ferrier; but when he wrote he was smarting under the sense of
-having failed to receive a fair consideration of his claims, and he
-undoubtedly spoke more strongly than the case required.
-
-After this controversy was over, Ferrier's interest in polemical
-philosophy in great degree waned; and in the quiet of the old
-University town of St. Andrews--the town which provides so rich a fund
-of historic interest combined with the academic calm of University
-life--Ferrier passed the remainder of his days working at his favourite
-subjects. Sometimes these were varied by incursions into literature, in
-which his interest grew ever keener; and economics, which was one of
-the subjects he was bound to teach. His life was uneventful; it was
-varied little by expeditions into the outer world, much as these would
-have been appreciated by his friends. His whole interest was centred in
-his work and in the University in which he taught, and whose well-being
-was so dear to him. Of his letters, few, unfortunately, have been
-preserved; and this is the more unfortunate that he had the gift, now
-comparatively so rare, of expressing himself with ease, and in bright,
-well-chosen language. Of his correspondents one only seems to have
-preserved the letters written to him, Mr. George Makgill of Kemback, a
-neighbouring laird in Fife and advocate in Edinburgh, whose similarity
-in tastes drew him towards the St. Andrews Philosophy Professor.
-
-Of these letters there are some of sufficient interest to bear
-quotation. One of the first is written in October 1851 from St.
-Andrews, and plunges into the deepest topics without much preface.
-Ferrier says:--
-
-'What is the Beginning of Philosophy? Philosophy must have had the same
-Beginning that all other things have, otherwise there would be
-something peculiar or anomalous or sectarian in its origin, which would
-destroy its claims to genuineness and catholicity. What, then, is the
-Beginning of all things and consequently the Beginning of Philosophy?
-
-'Answer--WANT.
-
-'Want is the Beginning of Philosophy because it is the Beginning of all
-things. Is the Beginning of Philosophy a bodily want? No. Why not?
-Because nothing that may be given to the Body has any effect in
-appeasing the want. The Beginning of Philosophy, then, must be an
-intellectual want--a Hunger of the Soul.
-
-'But all wants have their objects in which they seek and find their
-gratification. What then is the object of the hunger of the soul?
-
-'Answer--KNOWLEDGE.
-
-'Philosophy is a Hunger of the Soul after Knowledge. What is
-Knowledge?--reduced through various intermediate stages to question,
-what is the common and essential quality in all knowledge--the quality
-which makes knowledge knowledge? Answer approached by raising question:
-What is the essential quality in all food--the quality which makes food
-food? This is obviously its physically nutritive quality. Whatever has
-the nutritive property is food; whatever has it not is not food,
-however like excellent beef and mutton it may be. So in regard to
-knowledge, its common and essential quality--the quality in virtue of
-which knowledge is knowledge--is its nutritive quality. Whatever
-nourishes and satisfies the mind is knowledge, as whatever nourishes
-and satisfies the body is food. The intellectually _nutritive property_
-in knowledge is the common and essential property in knowledge. What is
-the nutritive quality in knowledge? Answer (without beating about the
-bush)--TRUTH.
-
-'What is TRUTH? Answer--Truth is whatever is supported by Evidence.
-
-'What is EVIDENCE? Evidence is whatever is supported by Experience.
-What is EXPERIENCE? Here we stop; we can only divide Experience into
-its kinds, which are two, _Experience of Fact_ and _Experience of Pure
-Reason_. Observe the manoeuvre in the last line by which you knaves of
-the anti-metaphysical school are outwitted. You _oppose Pure Reason_ to
-_Experience,_ and philosophers generally assent to the distinction.
-This at once gives your school the advantage, for the world will always
-cleave to experience in preference to anything else, leaving us
-metaphysicians, who are supposed to abandon experience, hanging as it
-were in baskets in the clouds. But _I_ do not abandon experience as the
-ultimate foundation of _all_ knowledge; only I maintain that there are
-_two_ kinds of experience, both of which are equally experience, the
-experience of Fact and the experience of Pure Reason. You are thus
-deprived of your advantage. I am as much a man of experience as you
-are.'
-
-Evidently it had been a question with Ferrier whether he should use the
-expression Experience, so well known to us now, or substitute for it
-Consciousness, which, as a matter of fact, he afterwards did: 'Why is
-it so grievous and fatal an error to confound Experience and
-Consciousness? Is not a man's experience the whole developed contents
-of his consciousness? I cannot see how this can be denied. And
-therefore, before you wrote, I was _swithering_ (and am so still)
-whether I should not make consciousness the basis of the whole
-superstructure--the raw material of the article which in its finished
-state is knowledge. After all, the dispute, I suspect, is mainly
-verbal.'
-
-There are many evidences in these letters that Ferrier was not
-neglecting German Philosophy, for taking Experience as his basis he
-shows how it may be divided into _Wesen_ (_-an sich_), _Seyn_ (_für
-sich_), and the _Begriff_ (_anundfürsich_) on the lines of German
-metaphysics. As to the 'Common-Sense' Philosophy, he expresses himself
-in no measured terms: 'I am glad we agree in opinion as to the merits
-of the Common-Sense Philosophy. Considered in its details and
-accessories, it certainly contains many good things; but, viewed as a
-whole and _in essentialibus_, it is about the greatest humbug that ever
-was palmed off upon an unwary world. As an instance among many which
-might be adduced, of the ambiguity of the word, and of the vacillation
-of the members of this school, it may be remarked that while Reid made
-the essence of common-sense to consist in this, that its judgments are
-not conclusions obtained by ratiocination (_Works_, Sir W. Hamilton's
-edition, p. 425), Stewart, on the contrary, holds that these judgments
-are "the result of a train of reasoning so rapid as to escape notice"
-(_Elements_, vol. ii. p. 103). Sir W.'s _one hundred and six witnesses_
-are a most conglomerate set, and a little cross-examination would try
-their mettle severely.'
-
-The most important part of Ferrier's system was his working out of the
-'Theory of Ignorance,' in which, indeed, he might congratulate himself
-in having in great measure broken open new ground. He says of it:
-'Hurrah, [Greek: eurêka], I have discovered the _Law of Ignorance_--and
-if I had a hecatomb of kain hens at my command I would sacrifice them
-_instanter_ to the propitious patron of metaphysics. Look you here. The
-Law of Knowledge is this, that, in order to know any _one_ thing we
-must always know two things; _hoc cum alio_--object plus subject--thing
-+ me. This is the unit of knowledge. Analogously, only inversely, in
-order to be ignorant of any _one_ thing we must be ignorant of _two_
-things--_hujus cum alio_--object plus subject--thing + me. This is the
-unit of ignorance.' Apparently, in spite of full explanation of his
-newly-discovered view, Ferrier's correspondent had failed to take it
-in, and consequently he gently rails at him for 'sticking at the
-axiom,' and wishes him to help him to a name for what he calls the
-'Agnoiology' for want of something better. He goes on: 'I take it that
-I have caught you in my net, and that wallop about as you will I shall
-land you at last. I have now little fear that I shall succeed in
-convincing you, or at anyrate less hardened sinners, that the knowledge
-of object-subject is a self-contradiction, and that therefore
-object-subject, or matter _per se_, is not a thing of which we can with
-any sense or propriety be said to be ignorant. Be this as it may, you
-must at anyrate recognise in this doctrine a very great novelty in
-philosophy. The more incogitable a thing becomes, the more ignorant of
-it do _we_ become--that is the natural supposition. Is it not then a
-bold and original stroke to show that when a thing passes into absolute
-incogitability we cease that instant to be ignorant of it? I believe
-that doctrine to be right and true, but I am certain that, obvious as
-it is, it has been nowhere anticipated or even hinted at in the bygone
-career of speculation. I claim this as _my discovery_. In the doctrine
-of Ignorance I believe that I have absolutely no precursor. What think
-you?'
-
-Mr. Makgill had accused Ferrier of anthropomorphism in his system, and
-he replies as follows:--'You cannot charge me with anthropomorphism
-without being guilty of it yourself. Don't you see that "the Beyond"
-all human thought and knowledge is itself _a category_ of human
-thought? There is much _naïveté_ in the procedure of you cautious
-gentry who would keep scrupulously _within_ the length of your tether:
-as if the conception of a _without_ that tether was not a mode of
-thinking. Will you tell me why you and Kant and others don't make
-_existence_ a category of human thought? This has always puzzled me.
-
-'Surely the man who made extension and time mere forms of human
-knowledge need have made no bones of existence. Meanwhile, as the post
-is just starting, I beg you to consider this, that the anthropomorphist
-and the anti-anthropomorphists are both of necessity anthropomorphists,
-and for my part I maintain that the anti-man is the bigger
-anthropomorphist of the two.' This criticism of the 'Beyond' and its
-unknowableness, while yet it was acknowledged, is as much to the point
-in the present day as it was in those, and its statement brings
-forcibly before our minds the truth of Goethe's well-known saying:
-'_Der Mensch begreift niemals wie anthropomorphisch er ist_.'
-
-The doctrine of Ignorance, so essential to Ferrier's system, he found
-it hard to make clear to others:--'I am astonished at your not seeing
-the use, indeed the absolute necessity, of a _true_ doctrine of
-ignorance. This blindness of yours shows me what I may expect from the
-public; and how careful I must be, if I would go down at all, to render
-myself perfectly clear and explicit. Don't you see that a correct
-doctrine of ignorance is necessary for two reasons--_first_, on account
-of the _false_ doctrine of ignorance universally prevalent, one which
-has hitherto rendered, and must ever render, anything like a scientific
-ontology impossible; and, _secondly_, because this correct theory of
-ignorance follows inevitably from my doctrine of knowledge? This, which
-I consider a very strong recommendation, an indispensable condition of
-the theory of ignorance, is the very ground on which you object to it.
-Surely you would not have me establish a doctrine of ignorance which
-was not consistent with my doctrine of knowledge. Surely I am entitled
-to deduce all that is logically deducible from my principles. Your
-meaning I presume is that my doctrine of ignorance flows so manifestly
-from my doctrine of knowledge that it is unnecessary to develop and
-parade it. There I differ from you. It flows _inevitably_, but I cannot
-think that it flows obviously. Else why was it never hit upon until
-now?... Don't tell me, then, that _my_ conclusions that matter _per
-se_, _Ding an sich_, is what it is impossible for us to be ignorant of,
-just _because_ it is absolutely unknowable (and for no other reason).
-Don't tell me that this conclusion is so obvious as not to require to
-be put down in black and white, when we find Kant and _every_ other
-philosopher drawing, but most erroneously, the directly opposite
-conclusion from the same premises. Matter _per se_, _Ding an sich_, was
-of all things that of which we were most ignorant!! and the ruin of
-metaphysics was the consequence of their infatuated blindness. Your
-objection, then, to my doctrine of ignorance, viz., that it is fixed in
-the very fixing of the doctrine of knowledge, and therefore does not
-require explication or elucidation, I cannot regard as a good
-objection. It is true that the one of these fixes the other; but it
-requires some amount of explanation and demonstration to make this
-palpable to the understandings even of the most acute, and I am not
-sure that even you (yes, put on your best pair of spectacles, you will
-need them) yet see how impossible it is for us to be ignorant of matter
-_per se_, or of anything which is absolutely unknowable.'
-
-This matter of the _Ding an sich_ Ferrier felt to be the crucial point
-in his system: 'You talk glibly of "existence _per se_," as maids of
-fifteen do of puppy dogs. This shows that, like a carpet knight, you
-have never smelt the real smoke of metaphysical battle, but at most
-have taken part in the sham fights and listened to the shotless popguns
-of the martinet of Königsberg. You will find existence _per se_ a
-tougher customer than you imagine.'
-
-As to the _Institutes_, then on the verge of publication, the author
-says: 'I am inclined to follow your advice, so far, in regard to the
-title of the work, and to call it the "Theory of Knowing and Being,"
-leaving out ignorance. But why an _introduction_ to metaphysics? If
-this be an _introduction_ to metaphysics, pray, Mr. Pundit, what and
-where are metaphysics themselves? No, sir, it shall be called a
-_text-book_ of metaphysics, meaning thereby, that it is a complete body
-(and soul) of metaphysics. You are an uncommonly _modest_ fellow in so
-far as the protestations of your _friends_ are concerned!'
-
-This correspondence appears to have continued regularly for some years,
-and to have dealt almost entirely with metaphysical and economic
-subjects--the subjects which were constantly in Ferrier's mind, as he
-taught them in the University and tried to work them out in his study.
-Doubtless it was of the greatest use to him to be able to write about
-them as he would, had opportunity served, have spoken; and this
-opportunity was afforded by his friendship with his correspondent,
-whose interest in philosophy was keen, and whose critical faculties
-were exceptionally acute, although he never accomplished any original
-work on philosophical lines.
-
-Of other letters few have been preserved. Absence from home did not
-make a reason for writing, for Ferrier's journeyings were but few. In
-1859, however, he made an expedition to England to see his
-newly-married daughter, Lady Grant, start for India with her husband,
-Sir Alexander Grant, after his appointment to the Chancellorship of the
-University of Bombay. From Southampton he made his way to the scene of
-his schooldays at Greenwich, from which place he writes to one of the
-sons of Dr. Bruce of Ruthwell, with whom he spent a happy childhood:
-'One of our fêtes was a sumptuous fish dinner at Greenwich. I call it
-sumptuous, but in truth the fish was utter trash, the best of them not
-comparable to Loch Fyne herring. Whitebait is the greatest humbug of
-the age, though it may be heresy to say so in your neighbourhood.' This
-journey was concluded by a visit to Oxford and to the Lake country,
-with both of which Ferrier's associations were so many and so
-agreeable.
-
-The following is a letter, dated 21st March 1862, to Professor
-Lushington, his friend and biographer:--'I have been very remiss in not
-acknowledging your photograph, which came safe, and is much admired by
-all who have seen it. I must get a book for its reception and that of
-some other worthies, otherwise my children will appropriate it for
-their collections, with which the house is swarming.... The _ego_ is an
-infinite and active capacity of _never being anything in particular_. I
-will uphold that definition against the world. Did you never feel how
-much you revolted from being fixed and determined? Depend upon it, that
-is the true nature of a spirit--never to be any determinate existence.
-This is our real immutability--for death can get hold only of that
-which has a determinate being. _We_ stand loose from all
-determinations. That is our chance of escaping his clutches."
-
-This expresses Ferrier's views and hopes for an after life: he looked
-forward to an immortality in which the particular and determinate
-should disappear and only the absolute element remain--in which death
-should mean only the rising from the individual into a true and
-universal life. It is a matter to which he frequently refers, and
-always in terms of a very similar nature. We shall see how, when the
-end was coming near, his views remained the same, and he was able to
-face the inevitable without a qualm or shadow of complaint.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VI
-
-FERRIER'S SYSTEM OF PHILOSOPHY--PHILOSOPHICAL WRITINGS
-
-
-'If one were asked,' says Professor Fraser, 'for the English writings
-which are fitted in the most attractive way to absorb a reader of
-competent intelligence and imagination in the final or metaphysical
-question concerning the Being in which we and the world of sensible
-things participate, Berkeley's _Dialogues_, Hume's _Inquiry into Human
-Understanding_, and some of the lately published _Philosophical
-Remains_ of Professor Ferrier are probably those which would best
-deserve to be mentioned.'
-
-It has been given to few philosophers of modern days to write on
-philosophic questions in a manner at once so lucid and so convincing as
-that of Ferrier. Nor can it in his case be said that matter is
-sacrificed to form, for the writer does not hesitate to 'nail his
-colours to the mast,' as he himself expresses it, and to tackle
-questions the most vital in their character in a straightforward and
-uncompromising fashion. His earliest published writings, as we have
-seen, took the form of a series of seven articles, which appeared,
-roughly speaking, in alternate months, between February of 1838 and
-March of 1839. These articles, entitled _An Introduction to the
-Philosophy of Consciousness_, represented the results of their author's
-work during the years which had elapsed since he first began to be
-really interested in philosophy, and to feel that the way of looking at
-it adopted almost universally in Scotland was not satisfying to
-himself, or in any way defensible.
-
-The whole point in Ferrier's view turns upon the way in which we look
-at 'Mind.' 'The human mind, to speak it profanely,' says Ferrier, 'is
-like the goose that laid the golden eggs. The metaphysician resembles
-the analytic poulterer who slew it to get at them in a lump, and found
-_nothing_ for his pains.... Look at thought, and feeling, and passion,
-as they glow in the pages of Shakespeare--golden eggs indeed! Look at
-the same as they stagnate on the dissecting-table of Dr. Brown, and
-marvel at the change. Behold how shapeless and extinct they have
-become!' Locke began by saying there are no original ideas, simply
-impressions from without; Hume then says cause and effect are incapable
-of explanation, and the notion which we form of them is a nonentity,
-seeing that we have a series of impressions alone to work from; Reid
-says there is a mind and there is an object, and calls in common-sense
-to interpret between the two. But the mistake all through is very
-evident: man looks at Nature in a certain way, interprets her by
-certain categories, and then he turns his eye upon himself,
-endeavouring thereby to judge of what he finds within by methods of a
-similar kind. And the human mind cannot be so 'objectised'; it is
-something more than the sum of its 'feelings,' 'passions,' and 'states
-of mind.' Dr. Reid had done a service by exploding the old doctrine of
-'ideas'; he brought mind into contact with immediate things, but much
-more is left for us to do; the same office has to be performed for
-'mind'--that is, mind when we regard it as something which connects us
-with the universe, or something which can be looked at and examined, as
-we might look at or examine a thing outside ourselves, and not as that
-which is necessary to any such examination. 'Is it not enough for a man
-that he is _himself_? There can be no dispute about that. _I_ am; what
-more would I have? What more would I be? Why would I be _mind_? I am
-_myself_ therefore let it perish.'
-
-What, then, makes a man what he is? It is the fact of consciousness,
-the fact which marks him off from all other things with a deep line of
-separation. It is this and this alone, Ferrier says, this '_human_
-phenomenon,' and not its objects, passions, or emotions, which leads us
-into pastures fresh and far separated from the dreary round which the
-old metaphysicians followed. The same discovery, of course, is always
-being made, though to Ferrier it was new; we are always straying into
-devious ways, ways that lead us into grey regions of abstraction, and
-we always want to be called back to the concrete and the real, to the
-freshness and the brightness of life as it is and lives.
-
-Ferrier from this time onwards, from his youth until his death, kept
-one definite aim in view: the object of his life was to insist with all
-his might that our interests must be concentrated on man as he is as
-man, and not on a mere sum-total of passions and sensations by which
-the human being is affected. The consciousness of a state of mind is
-very different from that state of mind itself, and the two must be kept
-absolutely distinct. 'Let mind have the things which are mind's, and
-man the things which are man's.' We should, Ferrier says, fling 'mind'
-and its lumber overboard, busy ourselves with _the man_ and his facts.
-Man's passions and sensations may be referred to 'mind' indeed, but he
-cannot lay his hands upon the fact of consciousness. That fact cannot
-be conceived of as vested in the _object_ called the 'human mind,' an
-object being something really or ideally different from ourselves. In
-speaking of 'my mind,' mind may be what it chooses, but the
-consciousness is in the _ego_; and mind is really destitute of
-consciousness, otherwise the _ego_ would necessarily be present in it.
-The dilemma is as follows: 'Unless the philosophers of mind attribute
-consciousness to mind, they leave out of view the most important
-phenomena of man; and _if_ they attribute consciousness to mind, they
-annihilate the object of their research, in so far as the whole extent
-of this fact is concerned.'
-
-Since Ferrier's time this point has been worked out very fully, and by
-none more successfully than by an English philosopher, Professor T. H.
-Green of Oxford, in his Introduction to the works of Hume. But when
-Ferrier wrote, his ideas were new; in England at least he was breaking
-up ground hitherto untouched, and therefore the debt of gratitude we
-owe him is not small, especially when we consider the forces against
-which he warred. 'Common-sense,' the solution offered for all
-philosophic difficulties, is really the _problem_ of philosophy, and to
-speak of the 'philosophy of common-sense' is simply to confuse the
-problem with its solution. Common-sense, or rather what is given by its
-means, has simply to be construed into intelligible forms: in itself it
-makes no attempt to solve the difficulties that present themselves, and
-it is folly to suggest its doing so. When a man speaks of _my_
-sensations or _my_ states of mind, he means something of which he--as
-consciousness--is independent, and which can be made an object to him.
-Were it not so, of course he could not possibly arrive at freedom, but
-would merely be the helpless child of destiny; and, as Ferrier points
-out, were consciousness and sensation one, consciousness would not have
-the power, undoubtedly possessed by it, of 'recovering the balance'
-that it loses on experiencing pain or passion; the return of
-consciousness, as he puts it, 'lowers the temperature' of the sensation
-or the passion, and the man regains the personality that for the time
-had almost vanished. A man, he tells us, can hardly even be said to be
-the 'victim' of his mind, and irresponsible--_i.e._, man stands aloof
-from the modifications which may visit him, therefore we should study
-him as he is, and not merely these 'states of mind' common to him and
-to animals alike. And consciousness must be active, exercising itself
-upon those states, and thereby realising human freedom.
-
-Philosophy, then, is the gospel of freedom as contrasted with the
-bondage of the physical kingdom. But we are in subjection at the first,
-and all our lifetime a constant fight is being carried on. Philosophy
-paints its grey in grey, another great philosopher has told us, only
-when the freshness and life of youth has gone: the reconciliation is in
-the ideal, not the actual world. And so with Ferrier: 'The flowers of
-thy happiness,' says he, 'are withered. They could not last; they
-gilded but for a day the opening portals of life. But in their place I
-will give thee freedom's flowers. To act _according_ to thy inclination
-may be enjoyment; but know that to act _against_ it is liberty, and
-thou only actest thus because thou art really free.' Great and weighty
-words, which might be pondered by many more than those to whom they
-were originally addressed.
-
-Having established his fundamental principles, Ferrier goes on to trace
-the birth of self-consciousness in the child--the knowledge of itself
-as 'I,' which means the knowledge of good and evil--the moral birth.
-Perception, again, is a synthesis of sensation and consciousness--the
-realisation of self in conjunction with the sensation experienced: it
-is, of course, peculiar to man. Things can only take effect on 'me'
-when there is a 'me' to take effect upon, and not at birth, or before I
-come to consciousness. Consciousness is the very essence and origin of
-the _ego_; without consciousness no man would be 'I.' It is our refusal
-to be acted on by outside impressions that constitutes our personality
-and perception of them; our communication with the universe is the
-communication of _non_-communication. And the _ego_ is not something
-which comes into the world ready-made; it is a living activity which is
-_never_ passive, for were it passive, it would be annihilated; in
-submitting to the action of causality its life would be gone. Our
-destiny is to free ourselves from the bonds of nature, from that
-'blessed state of primeval innocence,' the blessedness, after all, of
-bondage. A man cannot _be_ until he _acts_, for his Being arises out of
-his actions: consciousness being an act, our proper existence is the
-consequence of that act. His natural condition for others, and before
-he comes to existence, Ferrier says, is given, while his existence for
-himself is made by his thinking himself. It is only in the latter case
-that he can attain to Liberty, instead of remaining bound by the bonds
-imposed upon him by Necessity. The three great moments of humanity are:
-first, the natural or given man in enslaved Being; second, the
-conscious man in action working into freedom against passion; third,
-the 'I': man as free, that is, real personal Being.
-
-Philosophy has thus a great future before her. Instead of being a mere
-dead theory as heretofore, she becomes renovated into a new life when
-she gets her proper place; she is separated from her supposed
-connection with the physical world, and is recognised as consciousness.
-When this is so, she loses her merely theoretic aspect, and is
-identified with the living practical interests of mankind. The dead
-symbols become living realities, the dead twigs are clothed with
-verdure. 'Know thyself, and in knowing thyself thou shalt see that this
-self is not thy true self; but, in the very act of knowing this, thou
-shalt at once displace this false self, and establish thy true self in
-its room.' And Ferrier goes on to trace the bearings of his theories in
-the moral and intellectual world. He finds in morality something more
-than a refined self-love; he finds the dawning will endeavouring to
-assert itself, to break free from the trammels imposed upon it by
-nature. Freedom, the great end of man, is contravened by the passive
-conditions of his nature; these are therefore wrong, and every act of
-resistance tends to the accomplishment of the one important end, which
-is to procure his liberty.
-
-This essay, or series of essays, gives the keynote to Ferrier's thought
-and writings, therefore it seemed worth while to consider its argument
-in detail. The completeness of the break with the old philosophy is
-manifest. The 'scientific' methods applied to every region of knowledge
-were then in universal use, and no little courage was required to
-challenge their pretensions as they were challenged by Ferrier. But in
-courage, as we know, Ferrier was never lacking. His mind once made up,
-he had no fear in making his opinions known. He considered that the
-Scottish Philosophy had become something very like materialism in the
-hands of Brown and others, and he believed that the whole point of view
-must be changed if a really spiritual philosophy was to take its place.
-There may be traces of the impetuosity of youth in this attack: much
-working out was undoubtedly required before it could be said that a
-system had been established. But all the same this essay is a brilliant
-piece of philosophic writing--instinct with life and enthusiasm--one
-which must have made its readers feel that the dry bones of a dead
-system had wakened into life, and that what they had imagined an
-abstract and dismal science had become instinct with living, practical
-interest--something to be 'lived' as well as studied.
-
-The _Institutes of Metaphysics_--the work by which Ferrier's name will
-descend to posterity--is a development of the Philosophy of
-Consciousness; but it is more carefully reasoned out and
-systematised--the result of many years of thoughtful labour. For
-several years before the work was published (in 1854) the propositions
-which are contained in it were developed in the course of Ferrier's
-regular lectures. The _Institutes_, or _Theory of Knowing and Being_,
-commences with a definition of philosophy as a 'body of reasoned
-truth,' and states that though there were plenty of dissertations on
-the subject in existence, there was no philosophy itself--no scheme of
-demonstrated truth; and this, and not simply a 'contribution' to
-philosophy was what was now required, and what the writer proposed to
-give. The divisions into which he separates Philosophy are: first, the
-Epistemology, or theory of knowledge; secondly, the Agnoiology, or
-theory of ignorance; and thirdly, the Ontology, or theory of being. The
-fundamental question is, 'What is the _one_ feature which is identical,
-invariable, and essential in all the varieties of our knowledge?'
-
-The first condition of knowledge is that we should know ourselves, and
-reason gives certainty to this proposition which is not capable of
-demonstration, owing to its being itself the starting-point; the
-counter-proposition, asserting the separate subject and object of
-knowledge, and the mutual presence of the two without intelligence's
-being necessarily cognisant of itself, represents general opinion, and
-the ordinary view of popular psychology. Knowledge, then, Ferrier goes
-on, always has the self as an essential part of it; it is
-knowledge-in-union-with-whatever-it-apprehends. The objective part of
-the object of knowledge, though distinguishable, is not really
-separable from the subjective or _ego_; both constitute the _unit_ of
-knowledge--an utterance thoroughly Hegelian in its character, however
-Ferrier may disclaim a connection with Hegel's system. In space they
-may be separated, but not in cognition, and this idealism does not for
-one moment deny the existence of 'external' things, but only says they
-can have no meaning if out of relation to those which are 'internal';
-as Hegel might have put it, they could be known as separable by means
-of 'abstraction' only. From this point we are led on to the next
-statement, and a most important statement it is, that matter _per se_
-is of necessity absolutely unknowable; or to what Ferrier calls the
-Theory of Ignorance. Whether or not this theory can make good the title
-to originality which its author claims for it, there is no doubt that
-its statement in clear language, such as no one can fail to understand,
-marks an important era in English speculation. There are, Ferrier says,
-two sorts of so-called ignorance: one of these is incidental to some
-minds, but not to all--an ignorance of defect, he puts it--just as we
-might be said to be ignorant of a language we had never learned. But
-the other ignorance (not, properly speaking, ignorance at all) is
-incident to _all_ intelligence by its very nature, and is no defect or
-imperfection. The law of ignorance hence is that 'we can be ignorant
-only of what can be known,' or 'the knowable is alone the ignorable.'
-The bearing of this important point is seen at once when we turn back
-to the theory of knowing. Knowledge is something of which the subject
-cannot shake himself free; 'I' must always, in whatever I apprehend,
-apprehend 'me.' We don't apprehend 'things,' that is, but what is
-apprehended is 'me-apprehending-things.' Things-plus-me is the only
-knowable, and consequently the only 'ignorable.'
-
-This brings us a great way towards the Absolute Idealism associated
-mainly with the name of Hegel--towards the Knowledge or 'Experience' (a
-word which Ferrier afterwards himself makes use of) which shall cease
-to be a 'theory,' being recognised as comprehending within itself all
-Reality--as recognising no distinction between object and subject,
-excepting when they are regarded as two poles both equally essential,
-and separated only when looked at in abstraction. If Ferrier's 'theory
-of knowledge' did not proceed so far, he at least made the discovery
-that the subjective idealism of Kant was as unsatisfactory as the
-relativity of Hamilton, and as certainly tending to agnosticism. Kant's
-'thing-in-itself' is not that of which we are ignorant, or a hidden
-reality which can be known by faith. It is that which cannot possibly
-be known--and, in other words, a contradiction or nonsense. Now,
-Ferrier says, we arrive at the true Idealism--the triumph of
-philosophy. If it is said to reduce all things to the phenomena of
-consciousness, it does the same to every _nothing_. What falls out of
-consciousness becomes incogitable; it lapses, not into nothing, but
-into what is contradictory. The material universe _per se_, and all its
-qualities _per se_, are not only absolutely unknowable, but absolutely
-unthinkable. We do indeed know substance, but only as object plus
-subject--as matter _mecum_ or in cognition as thought together with the
-self.
-
-It may be true that we cannot claim for Ferrier complete originality in
-his thinking; work on very similar lines was being carried on
-elsewhere. It is not difficult to trace throughout his writings the
-mode of his development. The earlier works are evidently influenced by
-Fichte and his school, since the personal _ego_ and individual freedom
-figure as the principal conceptions in our knowledge; and even while
-the Scottish school of psychologists is being combated, the influence
-of Hamilton is very manifest. But as time goes on, Ferrier's ideas
-become more concrete; the theory of consciousness becomes more absolute
-in its conception; the human or individual element is less conspicuous
-as the universal element is more, which signifies that gradually he
-approaches closer to the standpoint of the later German thinkers by a
-careful study of their works, though for the most part it is Reid and
-Hamilton his criticisms have in view, and not the corresponding work of
-Kant.
-
-Still, we should say that Ferrier's attitude represented another phase
-in the same struggle against abstraction and towards unity in
-knowledge, rather than being a simple outcome of the German influence
-in Scotland. This last assumption he at least repudiated with energy,
-and boldly claimed to have developed and completed his system for
-himself. He claimed to have worked on national lines; to have started
-from the philosophy of his country as it was currently accepted, and to
-have little difficulty in proving from itself its absolute inadequacy.
-He felt that in his doctrine of the reality of knowledge he had found
-the means of solving problems hitherto dark and obscure, and he used
-his instruments bravely, and on the whole successfully.
-
-The faith-philosophy which professed to know reality through the
-senses, when these senses were a part of the external universe, or
-signified taking for granted the matter in dispute, was utterly
-repugnant to Ferrier. The Unknowable of Sir William Hamilton was
-inconceivable to him, and he ever kept this theory and its errors in
-his mind, while developing a system of his own. It is better that a
-philosophic system should grow up thus, instead of coming to us from
-without in language hard to understand because of foreign idioms and
-unwonted modes of expression. To be of use, a philosophy should speak
-the language of the people: until it becomes identified with ordinary
-ways of thinking, its influence is never really great; and the Idealism
-of Germany has in this country always suffered from being intelligible
-only to the few. Therefore we hold all credit due to Ferrier for
-consistently refusing to adopt the phraseology of a foreign country,
-and setting himself, heart and soul, to find expression for his
-thoughts in the language of his birth.
-
-Ferrier introduces his _Lectures on Greek Philosophy_, the last subject
-on which he undertook to write, in a manner which reminds us of Hegel's
-remarkable Introduction to his _History of Philosophy_; he begins, like
-Hegel, by pointing out that the study of philosophy is just the study
-of our own reason in its development, but that what is worked out in
-our minds hurriedly and within contracted limits, is in philosophy
-evolved at leisure, and seen in its just proportions: the historian of
-philosophy has not merely to record the existence of dead systems of
-thought that are past and gone, but the living products of his _own_,
-full of present, vital interest, and there is nothing arbitrary or
-capricious in such a history: all is reasoned thought as it manifests
-and reveals itself.
-
-Philosophy, Ferrier defines, by calling it the pursuit of Truth--not
-relative Truth, but absolute, what necessarily exists for all minds
-alike; and man's faculties (contrary to what is generally supposed) are
-competent to attain to it, provided only that they have something in
-common with all other minds, _i.e._, are partakers in a universal
-intelligence. He works this out in his Introduction in an extremely
-interesting way, showing, as he does, how in all intelligence there
-must be a universal, a unity; that the very essence of religion, for
-example, rests on the unity which constitutes the bond between God and
-man, and that when this is denied, religion is made impossible. What
-then, we may ask, is the Truth that has to be pursued?
-
-It is that which is the real, the object of philosophy--the real which
-exists for all intelligence. The historian of philosophy must show that
-philosophy in its history corresponds with this definition, if the
-definition be a true one.
-
-The lectures begin with Thales and the followers of the Ionic school,
-and Ferrier points out how, in spite of the material elements which are
-taken as a basis, their systems are philosophic, in so far as they aim
-at the establishment of a universal in all things, and carry with them
-the belief that this universal is the ultimately real; and this gives
-them an interest which from their sensuous forms we could hardly have
-expected to find. But it was Heraclitus' doctrine of Becoming that was
-most congenial to Ferrier, as it was to his great predecessor Hegel.
-Being and Not-Being, the unity of contraries as essential sides of
-Truth, in such conceptions as these Ferrier believes we come nearer to
-the truth of the universe than in the current views of philosophy, in
-which the unity of contrary determinations in one subject is regarded
-as impossible. Apart, either side is incomprehensible, and hence Mr.
-Mansel and Sir William Hamilton argue the impotence of human reason;
-but if, as Ferrier believes, they are shown to be but moments or
-essential factors in conception, the antagonism will be proved
-unreal--it will be an antagonism proper to the very life and essence of
-reason.
-
-Possibly in his account of the early Greek philosophers Ferrier may
-have done what many historians of philosophy have done before him, he
-may have read into the systems which he has been describing much more
-than he was entitled so to read. He may, when he is talking of the
-Eleatics of Heraclitus, and even of Socrates and Plato, have had before
-his mind the special battle which he had chosen to fight--the battle
-against sensationalism in Scotland, against materialism in the form in
-which he found it--rather than fairly to set before his readers an
-exact and accurate account of the teaching of the particular
-philosopher of whom he writes. But has it ever been otherwise in any
-history of thought that was ever written, excepting perhaps in some
-dryasdust compendium which none excepting those weighed down with dread
-of examination questions, care to peruse? Thought reads itself from
-itself, and if it sometimes reads the present into the past, and thinks
-to see it there, is there matter for surprise, or is it so very far
-wrong? If it tells us something of the secrets it itself conceals, it
-is surely telling us after all much of those that are gone.
-
-For Plato, Ferrier naturally had a very great affinity; he deals with
-him at length, and evidently had made a special and careful study of
-his writings. But the same method is applied by him to Plato as was
-before applied to the other Greek philosophers. 'It is not so much by
-reading Plato as by studying our own minds that we can find out what
-ideas are, and perceive the significance of the theory which expounds
-them. It is only by verifying in our own consciousness the discoveries
-of antecedent philosophers that we can hope rightly to understand their
-doctrines or appreciate the value and importance of their
-speculations.' And so Ferrier proceeds to prove the necessity for the
-existence of 'ideas'--of universals--as the absolute truth and
-groundwork of whatever is. No intelligence can be intelligent excepting
-by their light, and they are the necessary laws or principles on which
-all Being and Knowing are dependent. 'All philosophy,' he says of
-Plato, 'speculative and practical, has been foreshadowed by his
-prophetic intelligence; often dimly, but always so attractively as to
-whet the curiosity and stimulate the ardour of those who have chosen
-him as a guide.' And it was as such that Ferrier marked him out and
-chose him as his own. With Aristotle he had probably less in common,
-and his treatment both of him and of the Stoics, Epicureans, and
-Neo-Platonists, with which the history ends, is less sympathetic in its
-tone and understanding in its style. But these lectures as a whole,
-though never put together for printing as a book, must always be of
-interest to the student of philosophy.
-
-A philosophic article, entitled _Berkeley and Idealism_, and published
-in June of 1842, was designed to meet the attack of Mr. Samuel Bailey,
-who had written a _Review of Berkeley's Theory of Vision_, criticising
-the soundness of his views. Mr. Bailey replied, and Ferrier a year
-later published an article on that reply. Ferrier rightly appreciates
-the very important place which ought to be allowed to Berkeley as a
-factor in the development of philosophic truth--a place which has only
-been properly understood in later years. He saw the part he had played
-in bringing the real significance of Absolute Idealism into view, and
-deprecated the representation of his system made by David Hume, or the
-popular idea that Berkeley denied all reality to matter. What he did
-deny was the reality which is supposed to lie beyond experience, and
-his criticism in this regard was invaluable as a basis for a future
-system. In his own words, he did not wish to change things into ideas,
-but _ideas_ into _things_: matter could not exist independently of
-mind. But yet Ferrier is perfectly aware that Berkeley did not entirely
-grasp the absolute standpoint that the thing is the appearance, and the
-appearance is the thing. Regarded merely as a literary production, this
-article is entitled to rank with the classics of philosophic writings
-both as regards the beauty of its style and its logical development.
-Ferrier does not often touch directly on questions of religion or
-theology, but there is an interesting passage in this essay which shows
-his views regarding the question of immortality. He is talking of the
-impossibility of our ever conceiving to ourselves the idea of our
-annihilation. Such an idea could not be rationally articulated. We
-_appear_, indeed, to be able to realise it, but we only _think_ we
-think it: real thought of death in this sense would involve our being
-already dead; but in thought we are and must be immortal. 'We have
-nothing to wait for; eternity is even now within us, and time, with all
-its vexing troubles, is no more.'
-
-It was something absolute and enduring for which Ferrier was ever on
-the search. Those of his Introductory Lectures which are preserved bear
-out this statement, if nothing else were left to do so. Philosophy,
-thought, is more than systems: 'As long as man thinks, the light must
-burn.' Could he but teach the young men who gathered round him day by
-day to think, he cared little as to what so-called 'system' they
-adopted. He put his arguments clearly before them, but they were free
-to criticise as they would. And perhaps it was because they realised
-that the Truth was more to him than personal fame that their affection
-for him was so great. He always kept before him, too, that in teaching
-any science the mental discipline which it involves must not be
-overlooked. The practical rule of disciplining the mind should run side
-by side with the theoretical instruction, which might soon be
-forgotten; the great effort of a teacher should be in the best and
-highest sense to _educate_ his students. That is, he has not only to
-instil their minds with multifarious learning, but to make their
-thinking systematic.
-
-And philosophy must, he tells us, be made interesting if it is to be of
-any use: we must arrive at a 'philosophic consciousness,' and
-distinguish philosophy from mere opinion. It is mind which is the
-permanent and immutable in all change and mutation; even the Greeks
-found the idea of permanence in mind while they regarded change as the
-principle of matter.
-
-Thus, when the end of the day had come, when the lamp grew dim, and the
-books he loved so much must be for the last time shut, Ferrier's
-teaching was not so very different from what it was nearly thirty years
-before. The only real change was that the impetuosity of youth had
-gone; the man and his system had both become matured: the one more
-tolerant, more careful in expression, more considerate of the feelings
-of his opponents; the other more systematic, more coordinated, firmer
-in its grasp. There was much to do if the system were to be shown to
-hold its place in every department of life, as an absolute system must:
-much that has not even yet been accomplished. But for those who came in
-contact with him, the man was more even than his creed--to them this
-frail form which seemed to be wasting away before their eyes, yet never
-losing the keen interest in work to be accomplished, must have taught a
-lesson more than systems of philosophy dream of. For they could not
-fail to learn that the eternal can be found in history--even in history
-of long centuries ago, as in every other sphere of knowledge--and that
-the search for it supports the seeker in his daily life, takes all its
-bitterness from what is hardest, from pain, suffering, and even death.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VII
-
-THE COLERIDGE PLAGIARISM--MISCELLANEOUS LITERARY WORK
-
-
-The story of the so-called Coleridge plagiarism is an old one now, but
-it is one which roused much feeling at the time, and likewise one on
-which there is considerable division of opinion even in the present
-day. Into this controversy Ferrier plunged by writing a formidable
-indictment of Coleridge's position in _Blackwood's Magazine_ for March
-of 1840.
-
-When Ferrier took up the cudgels the matter stood thus. In the earlier
-quarter of the century German Philosophy was coming, or rather had
-already come, more or less into vogue in England; and as the German
-language was not largely read, and yet people were vaguely interested,
-though in what they hardly knew, they welcomed an appreciative
-interpreter of that philosophy, and an original writer on similar
-lines, in one whose reputation was esteemed so highly as that of
-Coleridge. Coleridge in this matter, indeed, occupied a position which
-was unique; for the treasures of German poetry and prose had not as yet
-been fully opened up, and he was held to possess the means of doing
-this in a quite exceptional degree. The works of Schiller, Goethe, and
-the other poets came to the world--and to Coleridge with the rest--as a
-sort of revelation. But the poet in his own mind was nothing if not a
-philosopher--a kind of seer amongst men, speculating, somewhat vaguely
-it might be, on matters of transcendental import--and in Schelling he
-thought he had discovered a kindred spirit; in his writings he believed
-he had found the Idealism for which he had so long been seeking in
-Böhme, Fox, and the other mystics--a creed which, though pantheistic in
-its essence, yet fulfilled the condition of being both orthodox and
-Trinitarian in its form. This, for many reasons, was a creed presenting
-many attractions to the younger men of the day, especially when set
-forth with a certain literary flavour. We have Carlyle's immortal
-picture of how it influenced John Sterling and his friends.
-
-Coleridge's _Biographia Literaria_, in which the principal so-called
-Schelling plagiarisms are contained, was published in 1817, but it was
-not for a considerable time after that that the plagiarisms were
-discovered, or at least taken notice of. The first serious indictment
-came from no less an authority than De Quincey, whose interest in
-philosophical matters was as great as Coleridge's, and who published
-his views in an appreciative but gossipy article in _Tait's Magazine_
-of September 1834. To commence with, he took up the question of the
-'Hymn to Chamouni'; but since, in this matter, Coleridge afterwards
-admitted his indebtedness to a German poetess, Frederica Brun, it does
-not seem an important one. Nor, indeed, does De Quincey pretend to take
-exception to certain expressions in Coleridge's 'France' which are
-evidently borrowed from Milton, or to regard them as indicating more
-than a peculiar omission of quotation marks. But the really serious
-matter, one for which De Quincey cannot by any means account, is that
-in the _Biographia Literaria_ there occurs a dissertation on the
-doctrine of Knowing and Being which is an exact translation from an
-essay written by Schelling. De Quincey cannot indeed explain away the
-mystery, but he makes the best of it, pleading excuses such as we often
-hear adduced in cases of 'kleptomania' when they occur amongst the
-well-to-do, or so-called higher classes--_e.g._, the evident fact that
-there was no necessity so to steal, no motive for stealing, even though
-the theft had evidently been committed. Still, though the defence may
-be ingenious, and though we may go so far as to acknowledge that
-Coleridge had sufficient originality of mind to weave out theories of
-his own without borrowing from others, it must be confessed that under
-the aggravated circumstances the argument falls somewhat flat; and this
-was the impression made on many minds even at the time. The ball once
-set rolling, the dispute went on, and the next important incident was
-an article by Julius Hare in the _British Magazine_ of January 1835.
-This is a hot defence of the so-called 'Christian' philosopher, who is
-said to be influencing the best and most promising young men of the
-day, as against the assault of the 'English Opium-Eater'--'that
-ill-boding _alias_ of evil record.' As to De Quincey's somewhat unkind
-but entertaining stories, there is some reason in Hare's objections,
-seeing that they were told of one to whom the writer owned himself
-indebted. But when Hare tackles the plagiarisms themselves, and
-endeavours to defend them, his task is harder. Coleridge had indeed
-stated that his ideas were thought out and matured before he had seen a
-page of Schelling; but at the same time, in an earlier portion of his
-work, he made a somewhat ambiguous reference to his indebtedness to the
-German philosopher, and deprecated his being accused of intentioned
-plagiarism from his writings. Of course it may be said that a thief
-does not draw attention to the goods from which he has stolen, but yet
-even Hare acknowledges that it is hard to understand how half a dozen
-pages (we now know that it really exceeded thirty) should have been
-bodily transferred from one work to another, and suggests that the most
-probable solution is that Coleridge had a practice of keeping notebooks
-for his thoughts, mingled with extracts from what he had been reading
-at the time, and that he thus became confused between the two.
-
-At this point Ferrier steps in and takes the whole matter under
-review--a matter which he looked upon as serious (perhaps more serious
-than we should now consider it) from a national as well as an
-individual point of view. He held that the reputation of his country
-was at stake, as well as that of a single philosophic thinker, and that
-neither De Quincey nor Hare had gone into the matter with sufficient
-care or knowledge, or ascertained how large it really was. It was
-undoubtedly the case that Coleridge's reputation in philosophic
-matters--and in these days that reputation was not small--was derived
-from what he had purloined from the writings of a German youth, and
-whatever the poet's claim on our regard on other scores may be, it was
-certainly due to Schelling that the debt should be acknowledged. As far
-as the _Biographia Literaria_ is concerned, the facts are plain.
-Coleridge makes certain general acknowledgments of indebtedness to
-Schelling to begin with. He acknowledges that there may be found in his
-works an identity of thought or phrase with Schelling's, and allows him
-to be the founder of the philosophy of nature; but he claims at the
-same time the honour of making that philosophy intelligible to his
-fellow-countrymen, and even of thinking it out beforehand. Having said
-so much, there follow pages together--sometimes as many as six or eight
-on end--which are virtually copied _verbatim_ from Schelling, though
-with occasional interpolations of the so-called author here and there.
-Ferrier has examined the whole matter most minutely, and made a long
-list of the more flagrant cases of copying: thirty-one pages, he points
-out, are faithfully transcribed, partially or wholly, from Schelling's
-works alone, without allowing for what the author admits to be
-translated _in part_ from a 'contemporary writer of the Continent.' And
-Schelling was not the only sufferer, nor was it only in the region of
-metaphysics that the thefts were made. The substratum of a whole
-chapter of the _Biographia Literaria_ is, Ferrier discovered, taken
-from another author named Maasz, and Coleridge's lecture 'On Poesy or
-Art' is closely copied and largely translated from Schelling's
-'Discourse upon the Relations in which the Plastic Arts stand to
-Nature.' This was a blow indeed to those who had boasted of the
-profundity of Coleridge's views on art; but his poetry surely remained
-intact. But no, 'Verses exemplifying the Homeric Metre' are found to
-be--unacknowledged--a translation from Schiller; and yet worse, because
-less likely to be discovered, the lines written 'To a Cataract' have
-the same metre, language, and thought as certain verses by Count von
-Stolberg, which were shown to Ferrier by a friend.
-
-The whole matter is a very strange one and not easy to explain. Of
-course the references to Schelling's labours in similar lines are
-there, and may in a sense disarm our criticism. But then,
-unfortunately, there also are the statements that the ideas had been
-matured in Coleridge's mind before he had seen a single line of
-Schelling's work, and he clearly gives us to understand that he had
-toiled out the system for himself, and that it was the 'offspring of
-his own spirit.' It is this overmuch protesting that makes us, like
-Ferrier, disposed to take the darkest view of the affair: anything that
-can be said in Coleridge's defence is found in the manner in which it
-was taken by the one who had most right to feel aggrieved. In the life
-of Jowett,[10] recently published, there is an interesting account of
-Schelling's views on Coleridge, taken from a conversation, notes of
-which were made by the late Sir Alexander Grant, Ferrier's son-in-law,
-when still an undergraduate. Jowett, while at Berlin, had, it appears,
-seen Schelling, and talked to him of the plagiarisms. He took the
-matter, Jowett states, good-naturedly, thought Coleridge to have been
-attacked unfairly, and even went so far as to assert that he had
-expressed many things better than he could have done himself--certainly
-a very generous acknowledgment. Probably the most charitable
-construction we can put on Coleridge's act is that which Jowett himself
-advances in saying that the poet is not to be looked upon or judged as
-an ordinary man would be, seeing that often enough he hardly could be
-said to have been responsible for his actions; while his egotism, which
-was extreme, may have likewise led him--it may be almost
-unconsciously--into acts of doubtful honesty. But evidently, in spite
-of Ferrier's work, Jowett, and possibly even Schelling himself, had no
-idea of the extent to which the plagiarisms extended. There would, of
-course, have been comparatively little harm in Coleridge's action had
-he been content to borrow materials which he was about to work up in
-his own way, or to do what his biographer Gillman says is done by the
-'bee which flies from flower to flower in quest of food,' but which
-'digests and elaborates' that food by its native power. Unfortunately,
-the more we read Coleridge's philosophic writings, the more we feel
-constrained to agree with Ferrier that the matter is not digested as
-Gillman suggests, but taken possession of in its ready-made condition.
-The parts which he adds do not assist in throwing light on what
-precedes, but are evidently padding of a somewhat commonplace and
-superficial kind. We can only say, like Jowett, that the manner of his
-life may have injured Coleridge's moral sense, and that his desire to
-pose as a philosopher who should yet be a so-called 'Christian' may
-have led him to encroach upon the spheres of others, instead of keeping
-to those in which he could hold his own unchallenged.
-
- [10] _Life of Benjamin Jowett_, vol. i. pp. 98 and 145.
-
-A labour of love with Ferrier, on very different lines than the above,
-was to bring out in five volumes the works of his father-in-law, John
-Wilson, 'Christopher North,' including the _Noctes Ambrosianæ_, and his
-Essays and Papers contributed to _Blackwood_. This was published in
-1856, but must, of course, have meant a considerable amount of work to
-the editor for some time previously. One of the most interesting parts
-of the work is Ferrier's preface to the famous 'Chaldee Manuscript,' in
-vol. iv. The story of the 'Chaldee MS.' is now a matter of history,
-fully recorded in the recently published records of the famous house of
-Blackwood. In 1817 the Whigs ruled in matters literary, mainly through
-the instrumentality of the _Edinburgh Review_, then in its heyday of
-fame. A reaction, however, set in, and the change was inaugurated by
-the publication of the so-called 'Chaldee MS.,' a wild _extravaganza_,
-or _jeu d'esprit_, hitting off the foibles of Whiggism, under the guise
-of an allegory describing the origin and rise of _Blackwood's
-Magazine_, the rival which had risen up in opposition to the _Review_,
-and the discomfiture of another journal carried on under the auspices
-of Constable. It was in the seventh number of _Blackwood_ that the
-satire appeared--that is, the first number of _Blackwood's Edinburgh
-Magazine_ as distinguished from the _Edinburgh Monthly Magazine_,
-published from Blackwood's office to begin with, but on comparatively
-mild and inoffensive lines. One may imagine the effect of this Tory
-outburst on the society of Edinburgh. All the _literati_ of the town
-were involved: Sir Walter Scott himself, Mackenzie, Sir David Brewster,
-Sir William Hamilton, Professor Jamieson, Tytler, Playfair, and many
-others, some of whom emerged but seldom from the retirement of private
-life. Nowadays it would be difficult, if not impossible, to identify
-the different characters, were it not for the assistance of Professor
-Ferrier's marginal notes; but in those days they were no doubt
-recognisable enough. Of course the magazine went like wildfire; but the
-ludicrous description in semi-biblical language of individuals with
-absurd allegorical appendages, constituted, as Ferrier acknowledges, an
-offence against propriety which could not be defended, even though no
-real malevolence might be signified. Whether Ferrier was justified in
-republishing the _Noctes_, in so far as they could be identified with
-Wilson, has been disputed; but, as the publisher, Major Blackwood,
-points out, the time was past for anyone to be hurt by the
-personalities which they contained, and the only harm the republication
-could inflict was upon the _Noctes_ themselves. The conception of the
-'Chaldee Manuscript,' he tells us, was in the first part due to Hogg;
-and Wilson and Lockhart were held responsible for the last. There is a
-tradition, too, though Ferrier does not mention it, that Hamilton was
-one of the party in Mr. Wilson's house (53 Queen Street) where the skit
-was said to have been concocted, and that he even contributed to it a
-verse. This may have been the case, as Wilson and Lockhart were his
-intimate friends; but it seems strange to think of so thoroughgoing a
-Whig being found mixed up in such a plot, and with such companions.
-
-Though it is easy to understand that Ferrier felt the editing of his
-father-in-law and uncle's work was a duty which it was incumbent upon
-him to perform, one cannot help surmising that it may have been a less
-congenial task to him than many others. There was little in common
-between the two men, both distinguished in their way, and Wilson's
-humour and poetic fancy, however bright and vivid, was not of the sort
-that would appeal most to Ferrier. A few years before his death Ferrier
-gave up the project he had in view of writing Wilson's life, partly in
-despair of setting forth his talents as he felt they should be set
-forth, and partly from the lack of material to work from. He says, in a
-letter written at the time, 'It would do no good to talk in general
-terms of his wonderful powers, of his genius being greater (as in some
-sense it was) than that of any of his contemporaries--greater, too,
-than any of his publications show. The public would require other
-evidences of this beyond one's mere word--something might have been
-done had some of us Boswellized him judiciously, but this having been
-omitted, I do not see how it is possible to do him justice.' The book
-was eventually undertaken, and successfully accomplished, by Wilson's
-daughter, Mrs. Gordon.
-
-We have spoken of Ferrier's interest in German literature; so early as
-1839 he published a translation of _Pietro d'Abano_ by Ludwig Tieck,
-one of the inner circle of the so-called Romantic School to which the
-Schlegels and Novalis also belonged--the school which opposed itself to
-the eighteenth-century enlightenment, making its cry the return to
-nature, and demanding with Fichte that a work of art should be a 'free
-product of the inner consciousness.' Another specimen of Ferrier's
-translating powers is given in a rendering from Deinhardstein's _Bild
-der Danæ_, a love story in which Salvator Rosa figures. This appeared
-in _Blackwood_ of September 1841, and an extract from it is published
-in the _Remains_.
-
-But one of the earliest and most remarkable of Ferrier's literary
-criticisms in _Blackwood's Magazine_ was an anonymous article on the
-various translations of Goethe's _Faust_ published in 1840. We have
-seen that Ferrier had made a special study of the writings of Schiller
-and Goethe, and that his work had been much appreciated both by Lytton
-and De Quincey. In this article the writer takes seven different
-renderings of the drama, carefully analyses them, points out their
-deficiencies, and even adventures on the difficult task, for a critic,
-of himself translating one or two pages. Now that German is so widely
-read in England, we are all too well aware of the insufficiency of any
-translation of _Faust_ to regard even the best in any other light than
-as a makeshift. But then things were different, and it was possible
-that wrong impressions of the original might be conveyed by inadequate
-translations. Ferrier's point was that Goethe, while writing in rhyme
-and in exquisitely poetical language, managed at the same time to find
-words such as might really be used by ordinary mortals; but the
-translators, in endeavouring rightly enough to keep to the rhyming
-form, entirely fail in their endeavour after the same end. He considers
-that though in prose we may deviate from the ordinary proprieties of
-language, we may not do so in rhyming poetry; for though the poet has
-to describe the thought and passion of real men in the language of real
-life, his dialect must at the same time be taken out of the category of
-ordinary discourse because of the use of rhyme; and he is therefore
-called upon as far as possible to remove this bar, and reconcile us to
-the peculiarity of his style by the simplicity of his language;
-otherwise all illusion will be at an end. Rhymes brought together by
-force can succeed in giving us no pleasure; the writer should possess
-the power of mastering his material and compelling it to serve his
-ends.
-
-Ferrier's speculative instincts naturally led him to discuss the
-often-discussed motive of the play. Is it so, as Coleridge says, that
-the love of knowledge for itself could not bring about the evil
-consequences depicted in the character of Faust, but only the love of
-knowledge for some base purpose? Ferrier replies, No, the love of
-knowledge as an end in itself would people the world with Fausts. 'Such
-a love of knowledge exercises itself in speculation merely, and not in
-action; and if the experiences of purely speculative men were gathered,
-we think that most of them would be found to confess, bitterly confess,
-that indulgence in an abstract reflective thinking (whatever effect it
-may have ultimately upon their nobler genius, supposing them to have
-one) in the meantime absolutely kills, or appears to kill, all the
-minor faculties of the soul--all the lesser genial powers, upon the
-exercise of which the greater part of human happiness depends. They
-would own, not without remorse, that pure speculation--that is,
-knowledge pursued _for itself_ alone--has often been tasted by them to
-be, as Coleridge elsewhere says, 'the bitterest and rottenest part of
-the core of the fruit of the forbidden tree.' This seems a strange
-confession for a thinker reputed so abstract as Ferrier, but of course
-the truth of what he says is evident. Knowledge regarded as an end in
-itself might have brought Faust into his troubles, it is true, and he
-might likewise have found himself ready to rush into what he conceives
-to be the opposite extreme; but a greater philosopher than Ferrier has
-said that though 'knowledge brought about the Fall, it also contains
-the principle of Redemption,' and we take this to signify that we must
-look at knowledge as a necessary element in the culture and education
-of an individual or a people, which, though it carries trouble in its
-wake, does not leave us in our distress, but brings along with it the
-principle of healing, or is the 'healer of itself.'
-
-Soon after the above, Ferrier contributes to the same journal an
-article entitled 'The Tittle-Tattle of a Philosopher,' or an account of
-the 'Journey through Life' of Professor Krug of Leipzig. Krug appears
-to have been a sort of Admirable Crichton amongst philosophers, to whom
-no subject came amiss, and who was ready to take his part in every sort
-of philosophical discussion. By Hegel and the idealist school he is
-somewhat contemptuously referred to as one of that class of writers of
-whom it is said '_Ils se sont battus les flancs pour être de grands
-hommes_.' Anyhow, his recollections are at least amusing, if not
-philosophically edifying.
-
-A review of the poems of Coventry Patmore a few years later is a very
-different production. It carries us back to the old days of
-_Blackwood_, when calm judgment was not so much an object as strength
-of expression, withering criticism, and biting sarcasm. Ferrier no
-doubt believed it would be well for literature to turn back to the old
-days of the knout; but few, we fancy, will agree with him, even if they
-suffer for so differing by permitting certain trashy publications to
-see the light. Too often, unfortunately, the knout, when it is applied,
-arrives on shoulders that are innocent. Of course Ferrier believed that
-the worst prognostications of a quarter of a century before were now
-being realised by the application not being persevered in; but as to
-this particular piece of criticism, whatever our opinion of Patmore's
-poetic powers may be, surely the writer was unreasonably severe; surely
-the work does not deserve to be dealt with in such unmeasured terms of
-opprobrium. It is refreshing to turn to an appreciative, if also
-somewhat critical review of the poems of Elizabeth Barrett, published
-in the same year, 1844, part of which has been republished in the
-_Remains_. In this article Ferrier urges once more the point on which
-he continually insists--the adoption of a direct simplicity of style:
-one which goes straight to the point, or, as he puts it, which is felt
-to 'get through business.' Excepting certain criticism on the score of
-style and phraseology, however, Ferrier is all praise of the high
-degree of poetic merit which the writings revealed--merit which he must
-have been amongst the first to discover and make known.
-
-The last of Ferrier's work for the magazine in which he had so often
-written, was a series of articles on the New Readings from Shakespeare,
-published in 1853. These articles were in the main a criticism of Mr.
-Payne Collier's 'Notes and Emendations' to the Text of Shakespeare's
-'Plays' from early MS. corrections which he had discovered in a copy of
-the folio 1632. Ferrier, who was a thorough Shakespeare student, and
-whose appreciation of Shakespeare is often spoken of by those who knew
-him, had no faith in the authenticity of the new readings, though he
-thinks they have a certain interest as matter of curiosity. He goes
-through the plays and the alterations made in them _seriatim_, and
-comes to the conclusion that in most cases they have little value. In
-fact, he proceeds so far as to say that they have opened his eyes to 'a
-depth of purity and correctness in the received text of Shakespeare' of
-which he had no suspicion--a satisfactory conclusion to the ordinary
-reader.
-
-Besides his work for _Blackwood_, Ferrier was in the habit of
-contributing articles to the _Imperial Dictionary of Universal
-Biography_ on the various philosophers. Two of these, the biographies
-of Schelling and Hegel, are printed in the _Remains_, but besides these
-he wrote on Adam Smith, Swift, Schiller, etc., and occasionally
-utilised the articles in his lectures.
-
-On yet another line Ferrier wrote a pamphlet in 1848, entitled
-_Observations on Church and State_, suggested by the Duke of Argyll's
-essay on the Ecclesiastical History of Scotland. This pamphlet aims at
-proving that the Assembly of the Church is really, as the Duke argues,
-not merely an ecclesiastical, but a national council, or, as Ferrier
-terms it, the 'second and junior of the Scottish Houses of Parliament.'
-Being therefore amenable to no other earthly power, it was justified in
-opposing the decrees of the Court of Session; though, however, the Free
-Church ministers were right in defending their constitutional
-privileges, Ferrier holds that they were wrong in doing so as the
-'Church' in opposition to the 'State,' and that this brought upon them
-their discomfiture. They should not, in his view, have acknowledged
-that the Church's property could be forfeit to the State, and
-consequently should not have voluntarily resigned their livings. The
-pamphlet shows considerable interest in the controversy raging so
-vehemently at the time.
-
-In St. Andrews there was no social meeting at which Ferrier was not a
-welcome guest. When popular lectures, then coming into vogue, were
-instituted in the town, Ferrier was called upon to deliver one of the
-series, the subject chosen being 'Our Contemporary Poetical
-Literature.' He says in a letter: 'I am in perfect agony in quest of
-something to say about "Our Contemporary Poets" in the Town Hall here
-on Friday. I must pump up something, being committed like an ass to
-that subject, but devil a thing will come. I wish Aytoun would come
-over and plead their cause.' However, in spite of fears, the lecture
-appears to have been a success: it was an eloquent appeal on behalf of
-poetry as an invaluable educational factor and agent in carrying
-forward the work of human civilisation, and an appreciation of the work
-of Tennyson, Macaulay, Aytoun, and Lytton. In the same year, but a few
-months later, Ferrier was asked to deliver the opening address of the
-Edinburgh Philosophical Institution. This Institution has for long been
-the means of bringing celebrities from all parts of the country to
-lecture before an Edinburgh audience, and its origin and conception was
-largely due to Professor Wilson, Ferrier's father-in-law, who was in
-the habit of opening the session with an introductory address. His
-health no longer permitting this to be done, the directors requested
-Ferrier to take his place. The address was on purely general topics,
-dealing mainly with the objects of the Institution, then somewhat of a
-novelty. He concluded: 'Labour is the lot of man. No pleasure can
-surpass the satisfaction which a man feels in the efficient discharge
-of the active duties of his calling. But it is equally true that every
-professional occupation, from the highest to the lowest, requires to be
-counterpoised and alleviated by pursuits of a more liberal order than
-itself. Without these the best faculties of our souls must sink down
-into an ignoble torpor, and human intercourse be shorn of its highest
-enjoyments, and its brightest blessings.' This is characteristic of
-Ferrier's view of life. One-sidedness was his particular abhorrence,
-and if he could in any measure impress its evil upon those whose daily
-business was apt to engross their attention, to the detriment of the
-higher spheres of thinking, he was glad at least to make the attempt.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VIII
-
-PROFESSORIAL LIFE
-
-
-The St. Andrews University has the reputation of being given to strife,
-and never being thoroughly at rest unless it has at least one law-plea
-in operation before the Court of Session in Edinburgh, or an appeal
-before the House of Lords in London. In a small town, and more
-especially in a small University town, there is of course unlimited
-opportunity for discussing every matter of interest, and battles are
-fought and won before our very doors--battles often just as interesting
-as those of the great world outside, and more engrossing because in
-them we probably play the part of active participators, instead of
-being simple spectators from outside. Of this time Sheriff Smith,
-however, writes: 'Never was the University set more social, and less
-given to strife than in Ferrier's day. Grander feats I have often seen
-elsewhere, but brighter or more intellectual talk, ranging from the
-playful to the profound, never have I heard anywhere.' In this respect
-it contrasts with the more self-conscious and less natural social
-gatherings of the neighbouring city of Edinburgh, whose stiffness and
-formality was unknown to the smaller town. The company, without passing
-beyond University bounds, was excellent. There was Tulloch at St.
-Mary's, still a young man at his prime, and a warm friend of Ferrier's
-in spite of the traditional decree that St. Mary's dealings with the
-other College should be as few as might be; there was Shairp,
-afterwards Professor of Poetry in Oxford, and always a delightful and
-inspiring companion; in the Chair of Logic there was Professor
-Spalding, whose ill-health alone prevented him from sharing largely in
-the social life; and he was succeeded by Professor Veitch, afterwards
-of Glasgow, whose appreciation of Ferrier was keen, and with whom
-Ferrier had so much intercourse of a mutually enjoyable sort. Then
-there was Professor Sellar, a staunch friend and true, and likewise Sir
-David Brewster, the veteran man of science, whom Scotland delights to
-honour. When Brewster resigned the Principalship of the United College
-in 1859, Ferrier was pressed to become a candidate for the post, and
-Brewster himself promised his support, and urged Ferrier's claims; but
-there were difficulties in the way, and his place was filled by another
-follower of science, Principal Forbes.
-
-Ferrier's students are now, of course, dispersed abroad far and wide.
-One of their number, Sheriff Campbell Smith of Dundee, writes of them
-as follows:--'His old students are scattered everywhere--through all
-countries, professions, and climates. To many of them the world of
-faith and action has become more narrow and less ideal than it seemed
-when they sat listening to his lofty and eloquent speculations in the
-little old classroom among earnest young faces that are no longer
-young, and nearly all grown dim to memory; but to none of them can
-there be any feeling regarding him alien to respect and affection,
-while to many there will remain the conviction that he was for them and
-their experience the _first_ impersonation of living literature, whose
-lectures, set off by his thrilling voice, slight interesting burr, and
-solemn pauses, and holding in solution profound original thought and
-subtle critical suggestions, were a sort of revelation, opening up new
-worlds, and shedding a flood of new light upon the old familiar world
-of thought and knowledge in which genius alone could see and disclose
-wonders.' And this sometime student tells how in passages from the
-standard poets undetected meanings were discovered, and new light was
-thrown upon the subject of his talk by quotations from the classics,
-from Milton and Byron as well as from his favourite Horace. His
-eloquence, he tells us, might not be so strong and overwhelming as that
-of Chalmers, but it was more fine, subtle, and poetical in its
-affinities, revealing thought more splendid and transcendental. 'In
-person and manner Professor Ferrier was the very ideal of a Professor
-and a gentleman. Nature had made him in the body what he strove after
-in spirit. His features were cast in the finest classic mould, and were
-faultlessly perfect, as was also his tall thin person,--from the finely
-formed head, thickly covered with black hair, which the last ten years
-turned into iron-grey, to the noticeably handsome foot.... A human
-being less under the influence of low or selfish motives could not be
-conceived in this mercenary anti-ideal age. If he made mistakes, they
-were due to his living in an ideal world, and not to either malice or
-guile, both of which were entirely foreign to his nature.'[11] And yet
-there was nothing of the Puritan about the Professor's nature. There
-are celebrations in St. Andrews in commemoration of a certain damsel,
-Kate Kennedy by name, which are characterised by demonstrations of a
-somewhat noisy order. Some of the Professors denounced this institution
-and demanded its abolition. But Ferrier had too much sense of humour to
-do this; he did not rebuke the lads for the exuberance of their
-spirits, but by his calm dignity contrived to keep them within due
-bounds.
-
- [11] _Writings by the Way_, by John Campbell Smith, p. 357
- _seq._
-
-A picture of Ferrier was painted about a year before his death by Sir
-John Watson Gordon, and it may still be seen in the University Hall
-beside the other men of learning who have adorned their University. It
-was painted for his friends and former students, but though a fairly
-accurate likeness, it is said not to have conveyed to others the keen,
-intellectual look so characteristic of the face. It was the nameless
-charm--charm of manner and personality--that drew Ferrier's students so
-forcibly towards him. As his colleague, Principal Tulloch, said in a
-lecture after his death: 'There was a buoyant and graceful charm in all
-he did--a perfect sympathy, cordiality, and frankness which won the
-hearts of his students as of all who sought his intellectual
-companionship. Maintaining the dignity of his position with easy
-indifference, he could descend to the most free and affectionate
-intercourse; make his students as it were parties with him in his
-discussions, and, while guiding them with a master hand, awaken at the
-same time their own activities of thought as fellow-workers with
-himself. There was nothing, I am sure, more valuable in his teaching
-than this--nothing for which his students will longer remember it with
-gratitude. No man could be more free from the small vanity of making
-disciples. He loved speculation too dearly for itself--he prized too
-highly the sacred right of reason, to wish any man or any student
-merely to adopt his system or repeat his thought. Not to manufacture
-thought for others, but to excite thought in others; to stimulate the
-powers of inquiry, and brace all the higher functions of the intellect,
-was his great aim. He might be comparatively careless, therefore, of
-the small process of drilling, and minute labour of correction. These,
-indeed, he greatly valued in their own place. But he felt that his
-strength lay in a different direction--in the intellectual impulse
-which his own thinking, in its life, its zealous and clear open
-candour, was capable of imparting.'
-
-Ferrier was not, perhaps, naturally endowed with any special capacity
-for business, but the business that fell to him as a member of the
-_Senatus Academicus_ was performed with the greatest care and zeal.
-With the movement for women's University education, which has always
-been to the front in St. Andrews, he was sympathetic, although it was
-not a matter in which he played any special part. 'No one,' it was
-said, 'had clearer perceptions or a cooler and fairer judgment in any
-matter which seemed to him of importance.' Principal Tulloch tells how
-on one occasion in particular, where the interests of the University
-were at stake, his clear sense and vigilance carried it through its
-troubles. His loyalty to St. Andrews at all times was indeed
-unquestioned. It is possible that had he made it his endeavour to
-devote more interest to practical affairs outside the University
-limits, it might have been better for himself. There may, perhaps, be
-truth in the saying that metaphysics is apt to have an enervating
-effect upon the moral senses, or at least upon the practical
-activities, and to take from men's usefulness in the ordinary affairs
-of life; but one can hardly realise Ferrier other than he was, a
-student whose whole interests were devoted to the philosophy he had
-espoused, and who loved to deal with the fundamental questions that
-remained beneath all action and all thought, rather than with those
-more concrete; and the former lay in a region purely speculative. Such
-as he was, he never failed to preserve the most perfect order in his
-class, and to do what was required of him with praiseworthy accuracy
-and minute attention to details.
-
-'Life in his study,' says Principal Tulloch, 'was Professor Ferrier's
-characteristic life. There have been, I daresay, even in our time,
-harder students than he was; but there could scarcely be anyone who was
-more habitually a student, who lived more amongst books, and took more
-special and constant delight in intercourse with them. In his very
-extensive but choice library he knew every book by head-mark, as he
-would say, and could lay his hands upon the desired volume at once. It
-was a great pleasure to him to bring to the light from an obscure
-corner some comparatively unknown English speculator of whom the
-University library knew nothing.'
-
-We are often told how he would be found seated in his library clad in a
-long dressing-gown which clung round his tall form, and making him look
-even taller--a typical philosopher, though perhaps handsomer than many
-of his craft. 'My father rarely went from home,' writes his daughter,
-'and when not in the College class-room was to be found in his snug,
-well-stocked, ill-bound library, writing or reading, clad in a very
-becoming dark blue dressing-gown. He was no smoker, but carried with
-him a small silver snuff-box.'
-
-Professor Shairp says that now and then he used to go to hear him
-lecture. 'I never saw anything better than his manner towards his
-students. There was in it ease, yet dignity so respectful both to them
-and to himself that no one could think of presuming with him. Yet it
-was unusually kindly, and full of a playful humour which greatly
-attached them to him. No one could be farther removed from either the
-Don or the Disciplinarian. But his look of keen intellect and high
-breeding, combined with gentleness and feeling for his students,
-commanded attention more than any discipline could have done. In
-matters of College discipline, while he was fair and just, he always
-leant to the forbearing side.... Till his illness took a more serious
-form, he was to be met at dinner-parties, to which his society always
-gave a great charm. In general society his conversation was full of
-humour and playful jokes, and he had a quick yet kindly eye to note the
-extravagances and absurdities of men.' And the Professor goes on to
-narrate how on a winter afternoon he would fall to talking of Horace,
-an especial favourite of his, and how then he would read the racy and
-unconventional translation he had made up for amusement. And afterwards
-he would talk of Wordsworth and the feelings he awoke in him, showing
-'a richness of literary knowledge, and a delicacy and keenness of
-appreciation, of which his philosophical writings, except by their fine
-style, give no hint.' Hegel and Plato were the favourite objects of his
-study. Of the former he never satisfied himself that he had completely
-mastered the conception. But the insight that he had got into his
-dialectic and into the doctrine of Reality contributed very largely to
-making his philosophy what it was. He endeavoured to apply the system
-in various directions, and ever continued in his efforts to work it out
-more fully.
-
-Another former student, who has been quoted before, writes in his
-Recollections of student life at St. Andrews:[12] 'Ferrier had not
-Spalding's thorough method of teaching. He had no regular time for
-receiving and correcting essays; he had only one written examination;
-for oral examination he had an easy way, in which the questions
-suggested the answers; yet all these drawbacks were atoned for by his
-living presence. It was an embodiment of literary and philosophical
-enthusiasm, happily blended with sympathy and urbanity. It did the work
-of the most thorough class drill, for it arrested the attention, opened
-the mind, and filled it with love of learning and wisdom. Intellect and
-humanity seemed to radiate from his countenance like light and heat,
-and illumined and fascinated all on whom they fell.... Let me recall
-him as he appeared in the spring of 1854. The eleven-o'clock bell has
-rung. All the other classes have gone in to lecture. We, the students
-of Moral Philosophy, are lingering in the quadrangle, for the
-Professor, punctual in his unpunctuality, comes in regularly two or
-three minutes after the hour. Through the archway under the
-time-honoured steeple of St. Salvator's he approaches--a tall somewhat
-emaciated figure, with intellectual and benevolent countenance. As he
-hurries in we follow and take our seats. In a minute he issues gowned
-from his anteroom, seats himself in his chair, and places his silver
-snuff-box before him. Now that he is without his hat and in his gown,
-he has a striking appearance. His head is large, well-developed, and
-covered with thick iron-grey hair; his features are regular, his mouth
-is refined and sensitive, his chin is strong, and his eyes as seen
-behind his spectacles are keenly intelligent and at the same time
-benevolent. He begins by calling up a student to be orally examined;
-and the catechising goes on very much in the following style:--
-
- [12] _Pleasant Recollections of a Busy Life_, by David
- Pryde, LL.D., p. 59.
-
-'"_Professor._--Well, Mr. Brown, answer a few questions, if you please.
-What is the first proposition of the lectures?
-
-'"_Student_ repeats it.
-
-'"_Professor._--Quite right, Mr. Brown. And, Mr. Brown, is this quite
-true?
-
-'"_Stud._--Yes.
-
-'"_Prof._--Quite right, Mr. Brown. At least, so I think. And, Mr.
-Brown, is it not absurd to hold the reverse?
-
-'"_Stud._--Yes.
-
-'"_Prof._--Yes, yes. Thank you, Mr. Brown. That will do."
-
-'The Professor then begins his lecture. As long as he is stating and
-proving the propositions in his metaphysical system, his tone is simple
-and matter-of-fact. His great aim is to make his meaning plain, and for
-that purpose he often expresses an important idea in various ways,
-using synonyms, and sometimes reading a sentence twice. But when he
-comes to illustrate his thoughts, his manner changes. He lets loose his
-fancy, his imagination, and even his humour; and his whole soul comes
-into his voice. His burr, scarcely distinguishable in his ordinary
-speech, now becomes strong, and his whole utterance is slow, intense,
-and fervid. He is particularly happy in his quotations from the poets,
-and he has a peculiarity in reading them which increases the effect.
-When rolling forth a line he sometimes pauses before he comes to the
-end, as if to collect his strength, and then utters the last word or
-words with redoubled emphasis. The effect of his eloquence on the
-students is electrical. They cease to take notes; every head is raised;
-every face beams with delight; and at the end of a passage their
-feelings find vent in a thunderstorm of applause.
-
-'The two most remarkable features of his lectures were their method and
-clearness. Order and light were the very elements in which his mind
-lived and moved. He kept this end in view, threw aside the facts that
-were unnecessary, arranged the facts that were necessary, and expressed
-them with a precision about which there could be no ambiguity. In fact,
-each idea and the whole chain of ideas were visible by their own light.
-So perspicuous were the words that they might have been called
-crystallised thoughts.
-
-'Out of the classroom Ferrier was equally polite and kind, especially
-to those students who showed a love and a capacity for philosophy. It
-was no uncommon thing for him to stop a student in the street and
-invite him to the house to have a talk about the work of the class. I
-have a distant recollection of my first visit to his study; I see him
-yet, with his noble, benignant countenance, as he reads and discusses
-passages in my first essay, gravely reasoning with me on the points
-that were reasonable, passing lightly over those that were merely
-rhetorical, and smiling good-naturedly at those that attacked in no
-measured language his own system.'
-
-Professor Ferrier was never failing in hospitality to his students as
-to his other friends. Dr. Pryde goes on: 'Every year Ferrier invited
-the best of his students to dinner. At the dinner at which I was
-present there were two of his fellow-professors, Sellar and Fischer. It
-was a great treat for a youth like me. Mrs. Ferrier was effervescent
-with animal spirits and talk; Ferrier himself, looking like a nobleman
-in his old-fashioned dress-coat with gold buttons, interposed
-occasionally with his subtle touches of wit and humour.' The Professor
-appears to have been an inveterate snuffer. His students used to tell
-how the silver snuff-box was made the medium of explaining the
-Berkeleian system, and how to their minds the system, fairly clear in
-words, became a hopeless tangle when the assistance of the snuff-box
-was resorted to. And Dr. Pryde narrates how he used to see Professor
-Spalding and Professor Ferrier seated side by side in the students'
-benches, looking on the same book, listening to their young colleague
-Professor Sellar's inspiring lectures, and at intervals exchanging
-snuff-boxes. He gives the following account of his last visit to
-Ferrier, when he was on his deathbed, but still in his library among
-his books: 'He told me that his disease was mortal; but face to face
-with death he was cheerful and contented, and had bated not one jot of
-his interest in learning and in public events. He was very anxious that
-I should take lunch with Mrs. Ferrier and the rest of the family; and
-though he could not join us, he sent into the dining-room a special
-bottle of wine as a substitute for himself. Two months afterwards he
-had passed away.'
-
-Tulloch writes after the sad event had occurred:[13] 'I have, of course,
-heard the sad news from St. Andrews. What sadness it has been to me I
-cannot tell you. St. Andrews never can be the same place without
-Ferrier. God knows what is to become of the University with all these
-breaks upon its old society; and where can we supply such a place as
-Ferrier's?' And his biographer adds: 'The removal of that delicate and
-clear spirit from a little society in which his position was so
-important, and his innate refinement of mind so powerful and beneficial
-an influence, was a loss almost indescribable, not only to the friends
-who loved him, but to the University. His great reputation was an
-honour to the place, combining as it did so many associations of the
-brilliant past with that due to the finest intellectual perception and
-the most engaging and attractive character. Even his little
-whimsicalities and strain of quaint humour gave a charm the more; and
-the closing of the cheerful house, the centre of wit and brightness to
-the academical community, was a loss which St. Andrews never failed to
-feel, nor the survivors to lament.'
-
- [13] _Memoir_, p. 196, by Mrs. Oliphant.
-
-Professor Ferrier was occasionally called upon to make a visit to
-London, although this did not seem to have been by any means a frequent
-occurrence. Business he must occasionally have had there, for in 1861
-he was appointed to examine in the London University, and in 1863,
-shortly before his death, the Society of Arts offered him an
-examinership in Logic and Mental Science, in place of the late
-Archbishop of York, which he accepted. But of one visit which he paid
-in 1858, with Principal Tulloch as joint delegate from the University
-of St. Andrews, Mrs. Oliphant gives an amusing account, in her _Memoir
-of Principal Tulloch_.[14] The object of the deputation was to watch the
-progress of the University Bill through the House of Commons. This Bill
-was one of the earliest efforts after regulating the studies, degrees,
-etc., of the Scottish Universities, and also dealt with an increase in
-the Parliamentary grant which, if it passed, would considerably affect
-the Professors' incomes as well as the resources of the University. The
-Bill, which was under the charge of Lord Advocate Inglis (afterwards
-Lord Justice-General of Scotland), likewise provided that in each
-University a University Court should be established, as also a
-University Council composed of graduates. Ferrier and Tulloch no doubt
-did their part in the business which they had in hand: they visited all
-the Members of Parliament who were likely to be interested, as other
-Scottish deputations have done before and since, and received the same
-evasive and varying replies. But in the evenings, and when they were
-free, they entertained themselves in different fashion. First of all,
-they have hardly arrived after their long night's journey's travel
-before they burst upon the 'trim and well-ordered room where Mr. John
-Blackwood and his wife were seated at breakfast'--this evidently at
-Ferrier's instigation. Then, having settled in Duke Street, St.
-James's, they are asked, rather inappropriately, it would seem, to a
-ball, where they were 'equally impressed by the size of the crinoline
-and the absence of beauty.' Next Cremorne was visited, Tulloch
-declaring that his object was to take care of his companion. 'If you
-had seen Ferrier as he gazed frae him with the half-amused,
-half-scowling expression he not unfrequently assumes, looking bored,
-and yet with a vague philosophical interest at the wonderful expanse of
-gay dresses and fresh womanhood around him!' 'He will go nowhere
-without a cab; to-day for the first time I got him into an omnibus in
-search of an Aberdeen Professor, a wild and wandering distance which we
-thought we never should reach.' The theatre was visited, too; Lear was
-being played, very possibly by Charles Kean. In the Royal Academy,
-Frith's Derby Day was the attraction of the year. But quite remarkable
-was the interest which Ferrier--who did not appreciate in general
-'going to church,' and used to say he preferred to sit and listen to
-the faint sounds of the organ from the quiet of his room--betrayed in
-the eloquence of Spurgeon, then at the height of his fame and
-attracting enormous congregations round him in the Surrey Garden
-Theatre. Tulloch wrote to his wife: 'We have just been to hear
-Spurgeon, and have been both so much impressed that I write to give you
-my impressions while they are fresh. As we came out we both confessed,
-"There is no doubt about _that_," and I was struck with Ferrier's
-remarkable expression, "I feel it would do me good to hear the like of
-that, it sat so close to reality." The sermon is about the most real
-thing I have come in contact with for a long time.' The building was
-large and airy, with window-doors from which you could walk into the
-gardens beyond, and Ferrier, Tulloch writes, now and then took a turn
-in the fresh air outside while the sermon was progressing.
-
- [14] P. 127.
-
-After London, Oxford was visited, and here the friends lived at Balliol
-with Mr. Jowett, who had not yet become the Master. Ferrier would
-doubtless delight in showing to his friend the beauties of the place
-with which he had so many memories, but to attend eight-o'clock chapel
-with Tulloch was, the latter tells us, beyond the limits of his zeal.
-Just before this, in 1857, another visit was paid by Ferrier to Oxford
-with his family, and this time to visit Lady Grant, the mother of his
-future son-in-law. It was at Commemoration-time, we are told, and a
-ball was given in honour of the party. On this occasion Ferrier for the
-first time met Professor Jowett, besides many other kindred spirits,
-and he thoroughly enjoyed wandering about the old haunts at Magdalen,
-where in his youth he had pelted the deer and played the part of a
-young and thoughtless gownsman.
-
-A little book was published some years ago, on behoof of the St.
-Andrews Students' Union, entitled _Speculum Universitatis_, in which
-former students and _alumni_ piously record their recollections of
-their _Alma Mater_. Some of these papers bring before us very vividly
-the sort of impression which the life left upon the lads, drawn
-together from all manner of home surroundings, and equally influenced
-by the memories of the past and the living presence of those who were
-the means of opening up new tracts of knowledge to their view. One of
-them, already often quoted, says in a paper called 'The Light of Long
-Ago': 'I always sink into the conviction that the St. Andrews United
-College was never so well worth attending as during the days when in
-its classrooms Duncan taught Mathematics, Spalding taught Logic, and
-Ferrier taught Metaphysics and Moral Science, illustrating living
-literature in his literary style, and in the strange tones, pauses, and
-inflections of his voice. To the field of literature and speculation
-Ferrier restored glimpses of the sunshine of Paradise. Under his
-magical spell they ceased to look like fields that had been cursed with
-weeds, watered with sweat and tears, and levelled and planted with
-untold labour. Every utterance of his tended alike to disclose the
-beauty and penetrate the mystery of existence. He was a persevering
-philosopher, but he was also a poet by a gift of nature. The burden of
-this most unintelligible world did not oppress him, nor any other
-burden. Intellectual action proving the riddles of reason was a joy to
-him. He loved philosophy and poetry for their own sake, and he infected
-others with a kindred, but not an equal, passion. He could jest and
-laugh and play. If he ever discovered that much study is a weariness of
-the flesh, he most effectually concealed that discovery.'
-
-And to conclude, we have the testimony of another former student who is
-now distinguished in the fields of literature, but who always remains
-faithful to his home of early days. Mr. Andrew Lang says: 'Professor
-Ferrier's lectures on Moral Philosophy were the most interesting and
-inspiriting that I ever listened to either at Oxford or St. Andrews. I
-looked on Mr. Ferrier with a kind of mysterious reverence, as on the
-last of the golden chain of great philosophers. There was, I know not
-what of dignity, of humour, and of wisdom in his face; there was an air
-of the student, the vanquisher of difficulties, the discoverer of
-hidden knowledge, in him that I have seen in no other. His method at
-that time was to lecture on the History of Philosophy, and his manner
-was so persuasive that one believed firmly in the tenets of each school
-he described, till he advanced those of the next! Thus the whole
-historical evolution of thought went on in the mind of each of his
-listeners.'
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IX
-
-LIFE AT ST. ANDREWS
-
-
-In an old-world town like St. Andrews the stately, old-world Moral
-Philosophy Professor must have seemed wonderfully in his place. There
-are men who, good-looking in youth, become 'ordinary-looking' in later
-years, but Ferrier's looks were not of such a kind. To the last--of
-course he was not an old man when he died--he preserved the same
-distinguished appearance that we are told marked him out from amongst
-his fellows while still a youth. The tall figure, clad in
-old-fashioned, well-cut coat and white duck trousers, the close-shaven
-face, and merry twinkle about the eye signifying a sense of humour
-which removed him far from anything which we associate with the name of
-pedant; the dignity, when dignity was required, and yet the sympathy
-always ready to be extended to the student, however far he was from
-taking up the point, if he were only trying his best to comprehend--all
-this made up to those who knew him, the man, the scholar, and the
-high-bred gentleman, which, in no ordinary or conventional sense,
-Professor Ferrier was. It is the personality which, when years have
-passed and individual traits have been forgotten, it is so difficult to
-reproduce. The personal attraction, the atmosphere of culture and
-chivalry, which was always felt to hang about the Professor, has not
-been forgotten by those who can recall him in the old St. Andrews days;
-but who can reproduce this charm, or do more than state its existence
-as a fact? Perhaps this sort only comes to those whose life is mainly
-intellectual--who have not much, comparatively speaking, to suffer from
-the rough and tumble to which the 'practical' man is subjected in the
-course of his career. Sometimes it is said that those who preach high
-maxims of philosophy and conduct belie their doctrines in their outward
-lives; but on the whole, when we review their careers, this would
-wonderfully seldom seem to be the case. From Socrates' time onwards we
-have had philosophers who have taught virtue and practised it
-simultaneously, and in no case has this combination been better
-exemplified in recent days than in that of James Frederick Ferrier, and
-one who unsuccessfully contested his chair upon his death, Thomas Hill
-Green, Professor of Moral Philosophy at Oxford. It seems as though it
-may after all be good to speculate on the deep things of the earth as
-well as to do the deeds of righteousness.
-
-If the saying is true, that the happiest man is he who is without a
-history, then Ferrier has every claim to be enrolled in the ranks of
-those who have attained their end. For happiness _was_ an end to
-Ferrier: he had no idea of practising virtue in the abstract, and
-finding a sufficiency in this. He believed, however, that the happiness
-to be sought for was the happiness of realising our highest aims, and
-the aim he put before him he very largely succeeded in attaining. His
-life was what most people would consider monotonous enough: few events
-outside the ordinary occurrences of family and University life broke in
-upon its tranquil course. Unlike the custom of some of his colleagues,
-summer and winter alike were passed by Ferrier in the quaint old
-sea-bound town. He lived there largely for his work and books. Not that
-he disliked society; he took the deepest interest even in his
-dinner-parties, and whether as a host or as a guest, was equally
-delightful as a companion or as a talker. But in his books he found his
-real life; he would take them down to table, and bed he seldom reached
-till midnight was passed by two hours at least. One who knew and cared
-for him, the attractive wife of one of his colleagues, who spent ten
-sessions at St. Andrews before distinguishing the Humanity Chair in
-Edinburgh, tells how the West Park house had something about its
-atmosphere that marked it out as unique--something which was due in
-great measure to the cultured father, but also to the bright and witty
-mother and the three beautiful young daughters, who together formed a
-household by itself, and one which made the grey old town a different
-place to those who lived in it.
-
-Ferrier, as we have seen, had many distinguished colleagues in the
-University. Besides Professor Sellar, who held the Chair of Greek,
-there was the Principal of St. Mary's (Principal Tulloch), Professor
-Shairp, then Professor of Latin, and later on the Principal; the Logic
-Professor, Veitch, Sir David Brewster, Principal of the United
-Colleges, and others. But the society was unconventional in the
-extreme. The salaries were not large: including fees, the ordinance of
-the Scottish Universities Commission appointing the salaries of
-Professors in 1861, estimates the salary of the professorship of Moral
-Philosophy at St. Andrews at £444, 18s., and the Principal only
-received about £100 more. But there were not those social customs and
-conventions to maintain that succeed in making life on a small income
-irksome in a larger city. All were practically on the same level in the
-University circle, and St. Andrews was not invaded by so large an army
-of golfing visitors then as now, though the game of course was played
-with equal keenness and enthusiasm. Professor Ferrier took no part in
-this or other physical amusement: possibly it had been better for him
-had he left his books and study at times to do so. The friend spoken of
-above tells, however, of the merry parties who walked home after dining
-out, the laughing protests which she made against the Professor's rash
-statement (in allusion to his theory of _perception-mecum_) that _she_
-was 'unredeemed nonsense' without _him_; the way in which, when an idea
-struck him, he would walk to her house with his daughter, regardless of
-the lateness of the hour, and throw pebbles at the lighted bedroom
-windows to gain admittance--and of course a hospitable supper; how she,
-knowing that a tablemaid was wanted in the Ferrier establishment,
-dressed up as such and interviewed the mistress, who found her highly
-satisfactory but curiously resembling her friend Mrs. Sellar; and how
-when this was told her husband, he exclaimed, 'Why, of course it's she
-dressed up; let us pursue her,' which was done with good effect! All
-these tales, and many others like them, show what the homely, sociable,
-and yet cultured life was like--a life such as we in this country
-seldom have experience of: perhaps that of a German University town may
-most resemble it. In spite of being in many ways a recluse, Ferrier was
-ever a favourite with his students, just because he treated them, not
-with familiarity indeed, but as gentlemen like himself. Other
-Professors were cheered when they appeared in public, but the loudest
-cheers were always given to Ferrier.
-
-Mrs. Ferrier's brilliant personality many can remember who knew her
-during her widowhood in Edinburgh. She had inherited many of her
-father, 'Christopher North's' physical and mental gifts, shown in looks
-and wit. A friend of old days writes: 'She was a queen in St. Andrews,
-at once admired for her wit, her eloquence, her personal charms, and
-dreaded for her free speech, her powers of ridicule, and her withering
-mimicry. Faithful, however, to her friends, she was beloved by them,
-and they will lament her now as one of the warmest-hearted and most
-highly-gifted of her sex.' Mrs. Ferrier never wrote for
-publication,--she is said to have scorned the idea,--but those who knew
-her never can forget the flow of eloquence, the wit and satire mingled,
-the humorous touches and the keen sense of fun that characterised her
-talk; for she was one of an era of brilliant talkers that would seem to
-have passed away. Mrs. Ferrier's capacity for giving appropriate
-nicknames was well known: Jowett, afterwards Master of Balliol, she
-christened the 'little downy owl.' Her husband's philosophy she
-graphically described by saying that 'it made you feel as if you were
-sitting up on a cloud with nothing on, a lucifer match in your hand,
-but nothing to strike it on,'--a description appealing vividly to many
-who have tried to master it!
-
-In many ways she seemed a link with the past of bright memories in
-Scotland, when these links were very nearly severed. Five children in
-all were born to her; of her sons one, now dead, inherited many of his
-father's gifts. Her elder daughter, Lady Grant, the wife of Sir
-Alexander Grant, Principal of the Edinburgh University and a
-distinguished classical scholar, likewise succeeded to much of her
-mother's grace and charm as well as of her father's accomplishments.
-Under the initials 'O. J.' she was in the habit of contributing
-delightful humorous sketches to _Blackwood's Magazine_--the magazine
-which her father and her grandfather had so often contributed to in
-their day; but her life was not a long one: she died in 1895, eleven
-years after her husband, and while many possibilities seemed still
-before her.
-
-Perhaps we might try to picture to ourselves the life in which Ferrier
-played so prominent a part in the only real University town of which
-Scotland can boast. For it is in St. Andrews that the traditional
-distinctions between the College and the University are maintained,
-that there is the solemn stillness which befits an ancient seat of
-learning, that every step brings one in view of some monument of ages
-that are past and gone, and that we are reminded not only of the
-learning of our ancestors, of their piety and devotion to the College
-they built and endowed, but of the secular history of our country as
-well. In this, at least, the little University of the North has an
-advantage over her rich and powerful rivals, inasmuch as there is
-hardly any important event which has taken place in Scottish history
-but has left its mark upon the place. No wonder the love of her
-students to the _Alma Mater_ is proverbial. In Scotland we have little
-left to tell us of the mediæval church and life, so completely has the
-Reformation done its work, and so thoroughly was the land cleared of
-its 'popish images'; and hence we value what little there remains to us
-all the more. And the University of St. Andrews, the oldest of our
-seats of learning, has come down to us from mediæval days. It was
-founded by a Catholic bishop in 1411, about a century after the
-dedication of the Cathedral, now, of course, a ruin. But it is to the
-good Bishop Kennedy who established the College of St. Salvator, one of
-the two United Colleges of later times, that we ascribe most honour in
-reference to the old foundation. Not only did he build the College on
-the site which was afterwards occupied by the classrooms in which
-Ferrier and his colleagues taught, but he likewise endowed them with
-vestments and rich jewels, including amongst their numbers a
-beautifully chased silver mace which may still be seen. Of the old
-College buildings there is but the chapel and janitor's house now
-existing; within the chapel, which is modernised and used for
-Presbyterian service, is the ancient founder's tomb. The quadrangle,
-after the Reformation, fell into disrepair, and the present buildings
-are comparatively of recent date. The next College founded--that of St.
-Leonard--which became early imbued with Reformation principles, was, in
-the eighteenth century, when its finances had become low, incorporated
-with St. Salvator's, and when conjoined they were in Ferrier's time, as
-now, known as the 'United College.' Besides the United College there
-was a third and last College, called St. Mary's. Though founded by the
-last of the Catholic bishops before the Reformation, it was
-subsequently presided over by the anti-prelatists Andrew Melville and
-Samuel Rutherford. St. Mary's has always been devoted to the study of
-theology.
-
-But the history of her colleges is not all that has to be told of the
-ancient city. Association it has with nearly all who have had to do
-with the making of our history--the good Queen Margaret, Beaton, and,
-above all, Queen Mary and her great opponent Knox. The ruined Castle
-has many tales to tell could stones and trees have tongues--stories of
-bloodshed, of battle, of the long siege when Knox was forced to yield
-to France and be carried to the galleys. After the murder of Archbishop
-Sharp, and the revolution of 1688, the town once so prosperous dwindled
-away, and decayed into an unimportant seaport. There is curiously
-little attractive about its situation in many regards. It is out of the
-way, difficult of access once upon a time, and even now not on a main
-line of rail, too near the great cities, and yet at the same time too
-far off. The coast is dangerous for fishermen, and there is no harbour
-that can be called such. No wonder, it seems, that the town became
-neglected and insanitary, that Dr. Johnson speaks of 'the silence and
-solitude of inactive indigence and gloomy depopulation,' and left it
-with 'mournful images.' But if St. Andrews had its drawbacks, it had
-still more its compensations. It had its links--the long stretch of
-sandhills spread far along the coast, and bringing crowds of visitors
-to the town every summer as it comes round; and for the pursuit of
-learning the remoteness of position has some advantages. Even at its
-worst the University showed signs of its recuperative powers. Early in
-the century Chalmers was assistant to the Professor of Mathematics, and
-then occupied the Chair of Moral Philosophy (that chair to which
-Ferrier was afterwards appointed), and drew crowds of students round
-him. Then came a time of innovation. If in 1821 St. Andrews was badly
-paved, ill-lighted, and ruinous, an era of reform set in. New
-classrooms were built, the once neglected library was added to and
-rearranged, and the town was put to rights through an energetic
-provost, Major, afterwards Sir Hugh, Lyon Playfair. He made 'crooked
-places straight' in more senses than one, swept away the 'middens' that
-polluted the air, saw to the lighting and paving of the streets, and
-generally brought about the improvements which we expect to find in a
-modern town. 'On being placed in the civic chair, he had found the
-streets unpaved, uneven, overgrown with weeds, and dirty; the ruins of
-the time-honoured Cathedral and Castle used as a quarry for greedy and
-sacrilegious builders, and the University buildings falling into
-disrepair; and he had resolved to change all this. With persistency
-almost unexampled, he had employed all the arts of persuasion and
-compulsion upon those who had the power to remedy these abuses. He had
-dunned, he had coaxed, he had bantered, he had bargained, he had
-borrowed, he had begged; and he had been successful. In 1851 the
-streets were paved and clean, the fine old ruins were declared sacred,
-and the dilapidated parts of the University buildings had been replaced
-by a new edifice. And he--the Major, as he was called--a little man,
-white-haired, shaggy-eyebrowed, blue-eyed, red-faced, with his hat
-cocked on the side of his head, and a stout cane in his hand, walked
-about in triumph, the uncrowned king of the place.'[15]
-
- [15] _Pleasant Memories_, by David Pryde, LL.D.
-
-Of this same renovating provost, it is told that one day he dropped in
-to see the Moral Philosophy Professor, who, however deeply engaged with
-his books, was always ready to receive his visitors. 'Well, Major, I
-have just completed the great work of my life. In this book I claim to
-make philosophy intelligible to the meanest understanding.' Playfair at
-once requested to hear some of it read aloud. Ferrier reluctantly
-started to read in his slow, emphatic way, till the Major became
-fidgety; still he went on, till Playfair started to his feet. 'I say,
-Ferrier, do you mean to say this is intelligible to the meanest
-understanding?' 'Do you understand it, Major?' 'Yes, I think I do.'
-'Then, Major, I'm satisfied.'
-
-Of the social life, Mrs. Oliphant says in her _Life of Principal
-Tulloch_: 'The society, I believe, was more stationary than it has been
-since, and more entirely disposed to make of St. Andrews the
-pleasantest and brightest of abiding-places. Sir David Brewster was
-still throned in St. Leonard's. Professor Ferrier, with his witty and
-brilliant wife--he full of quiet humour, she of wildest wit, a mimic of
-alarming and delightful power, with something of the countenance and
-much of the genius of her father, the great "Christopher North" of
-_Blackwood's Magazine_--made the brightest centre of social mirth and
-meetings. West Park, their pleasant home, at the period which I record
-it, was ever open, ever sounding with gay voices and merry laughter,
-with a boundless freedom of talk and comment, and an endless stream of
-good company. Professor Ferrier himself was one of the greatest
-metaphysicians of his time--the first certainly in Scotland; but this
-was perhaps less upon the surface than a number of humorous ways which
-were the delight of his friends, many quaint abstractions proper to his
-philosophic character, and a happy friendliness and gentleness along
-with his wit, which gave his society a continual charm.' Professor
-Knight, who now occupies Ferrier's place in the professoriate of St.
-Andrews, in his _Life of Professor Shairp_, quotes from a paper of
-reminiscences by Professor Sellar: 'The centre of all the intellectual
-and social life of the University and of the town was Professor
-Ferrier. He inspired in the students a feeling of affectionate devotion
-as well as admiration, such as I have hardly ever known inspired by any
-teacher; and to many of them his mere presence and bearing in the
-classroom was a large element in a liberal education. By all his
-colleagues he was esteemed as a man of most sterling honour, a staunch
-friend, and a most humorous and delightful companion.... There
-certainly never was a household known to either of us in which the
-spirit of racy and original humour and fun was so exuberant and
-spontaneous in every member of it, as that of which the Professor and
-his wife--the most gifted and brilliant, and most like her father of
-the three gifted daughters of "Christopher North"--were the heads. Our
-evenings there generally ended in the Professor's study, where he was
-always ready to discuss, either from a serious or humorous point of
-view (not without congenial accompaniment), the various points of his
-system till the morning was well advanced.'
-
-Ferrier's daughter writes of the house at West Park: 'It was an
-old-fashioned, rough cast or "harled" house standing on the road in
-Market Street, but approached through a small green gate and a short
-avenue of trees--trees that were engraven on the heart and memory from
-childhood. The garden at the back still remains. In our time it was a
-real old-fashioned Scotch garden, well stocked with "berries," pears,
-and apples; quaint grass walks ran through it, and a summer-house with
-stained-glass windows stood in a corner. West Park was built on a site
-once occupied by the Grey Friars, and I am not romancing when I say
-that bones and coins were known to have been discovered in the garden
-even in our time. Our home was socially a very amusing and happy one,
-though my father lived a good deal apart from us, coming down from his
-dear old library occasionally in the evenings to join the family
-circle.' This family circle was occasionally supplemented by a French
-teacher or a German, and for one year by a certain Mrs. Huggins, an old
-ex-actress who originally came to give a Shakespeare reading in St.
-Andrews, and who fell into financial difficulties, and was invited by
-the hospitable Mrs. Ferrier to make her home for a time at West Park.
-The visit was not in all respects a success, Mrs. Huggins being
-somewhat exacting in her requirements and difficult to satisfy. So
-little part did its master take in household matters that it was only
-by accident, after reading prayers one Sunday evening, that he noticed
-her presence. On inquiring who the stranger was, Mrs. Ferrier replied,
-'Oh, that is Mrs. Huggins.' 'Then what is her avocation?' 'To read
-Shakespeare and draw your window-curtains,' said the ever-ready Mrs.
-Ferrier! The children of the house were brought up to love the stage
-and everyone pertaining to it, and whenever a strolling company came to
-St. Andrews the Ferriers were the first to attend their play. The same
-daughter writes that when children their father used to thrill them
-with tales of Burke and Hare, the murderers and resurrectionists whose
-doings brought about a reign of terror in Edinburgh early in the
-century. As a boy, Ferrier used to walk out to his grandfather's in
-Morningside--then a country suburb--in fear and trembling, expecting
-every moment to meet Burke, the object of his terror. On one occasion
-he believed that he had done so, and skulked behind a hedge and lay
-down till the scourge of Edinburgh passed by. In 1828 he witnessed his
-hanging in the Edinburgh prison. Professor Wilson, his father-in-law,
-it may be recollected, spoke out his mind about the famous Dr. Knox in
-the _Noctes_ as well as in his classroom, and it was a well-known fact
-that his favourite Newfoundland dog Brontë was poisoned by the students
-as an act of retaliation.
-
-Murder trials had always a fascination for Ferrier. On one occasion he
-read aloud to his children De Quincey's essay, 'Murder as a Fine Art,'
-which so terrified his youngest daughter that she could hardly bring
-herself to leave her father's library for bed. Somewhat severe to his
-sons, to his daughters Ferrier was specially kind and indulgent,
-helping them with their German studies, reading Schiller's plays to
-them, and when little children telling them old-world fairy tales. A
-present of Grimm's Tales, brought by her father after a visit to
-London, was, she tells us, a never-to-be-forgotten joy to the
-recipient.
-
-The charm of the West Park house was spoken of by all the numerous
-young men permitted to frequent its hospitable board. There was a
-wonderful concoction known by the name of 'Bishop,' against whose
-attraction one who suffered by its potency says that novices were
-warned, more especially in view of a certain sunk fence in the
-immediate vicinity which had afterwards to be avoided. The jokes that
-passed at these entertainments, which were never dull, are past and
-gone,--their piquancy would be gone even could they be reproduced,--but
-the impression left on the minds of those who shared in them is
-ineffaceable, and is as vivid now as forty years ago.
-
-There was a custom, now almost extinct, of keeping books of so-called
-'Confessions,' in which the contributors had the rather formidable task
-of filling up their likes or dislikes for the entertainment of their
-owners. In Mrs. Sellar's album Ferrier made several interesting
-'confessions'--whether we take them _au grand sérieux_ or only as
-playful jests with a grain of truth behind. Here are some of the
-questions and their answers.
-
- Question. Answer.
-
- Your favourite character in Socrates.
- history.
-
- The character you most dislike. Calvin.
-
- Your favourite kind of literature. _The Arabian Nights._
-
- Your favourite author. Hegel.
-
- Your favourite occupation and Driving with a handsome
- amusement. woman.
-
- Those you dislike most. Fishing, walking, and
- dancing.
-
- Your favourite topics of Humorous and tender.
- conversation.
-
- Those you dislike most. Statistical and personal.
-
- Your ambition. To reach the Truth.
-
- Your ideal. Always to pay ready money.
-
- Your hobby. Peacemaking.
-
- The virtue you most admire. Reasonableness.
-
- The vices to which you are The world, the flesh, and
- most lenient. the devil.
-
-These last two answers are very characteristic of Ferrier's point of
-view in later days. He was above all reasonable--no ascetic who could
-not understand the temptations of the world, but one who enjoyed its
-pleasures, saw the humorous side of life, appreciated the æsthetic, and
-yet kept the dictates of reason ever before his mind. And his ambition
-to reach the Truth
-
- 'Differed from a host
- Of aims alike in character and kind,
- Mostly in this--that in itself alone
- Shall its reward be, not an alien end
- Blending therewith.'
-
-Thus, like Paracelsus, he aspired.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER X
-
-LAST DAYS
-
-
-It used to be said that none can be counted happy until they die, and
-certainly the manner of a man's death often throws light upon his
-previous life, and enables us to judge it as we should not otherwise
-have been able to do. Ferrier's death was what his life had been: it
-was with calm courage that he looked it in the face--the same calm
-courage with which he faced the perhaps even greater problems of life
-that presented themselves. Death had no terrors to him; he had lived in
-the consciousness that it was an essential factor in life, and a factor
-which was not ever to be overlooked. And he had every opportunity,
-physically speaking, for expecting its approach. In November 1861 he
-had a violent seizure of _angina pectoris_, after which, although he
-temporarily recovered, he never completely regained his strength. For
-some weeks he was unable to meet his students, and then, when partially
-recovered, he arranged to hold the class in the dining-room of his
-house, which was fitted up specially for the purpose. Twice in the year
-1863 was he attacked in a similar way; in June of that year he went up
-to London to conduct the examination in philosophy of the students of
-the London University; but in October, when he ought to have gone there
-once more, he was unable to carry out his intention. On the 31st of
-October, Dr. Christison was consulted about his state, and pronounced
-his case to be past hope of remedy. He opened his class on the 11th of
-November in his own house, but during this month was generally confined
-to bed. On the 8th of December he was attacked by congestion of the
-brain, and never lectured again. His class was conducted by Mr.
-Rhoades,[16] then Warden of the recently-founded College Hall, who, as
-many others among his colleagues would have been ready to do, willingly
-undertook the melancholy task of officiating for so beloved and
-honoured a friend. After this, all severe study and mental exertion was
-forbidden. He became gradually weaker, with glimpses now and then of
-transitory improvement. So in unfailing courage and resignation, not
-unwilling to hope for longer respite, but always prepared to die, he
-placidly, reverently, awaited the close, tended by the watchful care of
-his devoted wife and children.[17] On the 11th day of June 1864, Ferrier
-passed away. He is buried in Edinburgh, in the old churchyard of St.
-Cuthbert's, in the heart of the city, near his father and his
-grandfather, and many others whose names are famous in the annals of
-his country.
-
- [16] Afterwards Ferrier's son-in-law.
-
- [17] _Lectures and Philosophical Remains_, Introductory
- Notes, p. xxii.
-
-During these three years, in which death had been a question of but a
-short time, Ferrier had not ceased to be busy and interested in his
-work. The dates of his lectures on Greek Philosophy show that he had
-not failed to carry on the work of bringing them into shape, and though
-the wish could not be accomplished in its entirety, it speaks much for
-his resolution and determination that through all his bodily weakness
-he kept his work in hand. Of course much had to be forgone. Ferrier was
-never what is called robust, and his manner of life was not conducive
-to physical health, combining as it did late hours with lack of
-physical exercise. But in these later years he was unable to walk more
-than the shortest distance, the ascent of a staircase was an effort to
-him, and tendencies to asthma developed which must have made his life
-often enough a physical pain. Still, though it was evident that there
-could be but one ending to the struggle, Ferrier gave expression to no
-complaints, and though he might, as Principal Tulloch says, utter a
-half-playful, half-grim expression regarding his sufferings, he never
-seemed to think there was anything strange in them, anything that he
-should not bear calmly as a man and as a Christian. Nor did he talk of
-change of scene or climate as likely to give relief. He 'quietly,
-steadily, and cheerfully' faced the issue, be it what it might. The
-very day before he died, he was, we are told, in his library, busy
-amongst his books. Truly, it may be said of him as of another cut off
-while yet in his prime, 'he died learning.'
-
-'Towards his friends during this time,' says his biographer, 'all
-that was sweetest in his disposition seemed to gain strength and
-expansion from the near shadow of death. He spoke of death with
-entire fearlessness, and though this was nothing new to those who
-knew him best, it impressed their minds at this time more vividly
-than ever. The less they dared to hope for his life being prolonged,
-the more their love and regard were deepened by his tender
-thoughtfulness for others, and the kindliness which annihilated all
-absorbing concern for himself. In many little characteristic touches of
-humour, frankness, beneficence, beautiful gratitude for any slight help
-or attention, his truest and best nature seemed to come out all the
-more freely; he grew as it were more and more entirely himself indeed.
-If ever a man was true to philosophy, or a man's philosophy true to
-him, it was so with Ferrier during all the time when he looked death in
-the face and possessed his soul in patience.' And, as so often happens
-when the things of this world are regarded _sub specie æternitatis_,
-the old animosities, such as they were, faded away. It is told how a
-former opponent on philosophical questions whose criticisms he had
-resented, called to inquire for him, and when the card was given to
-him, Ferrier exclaimed, 'That must be a good fellow!' Principal
-Tulloch, his friend and for ten years his colleague, was with him
-constantly, and talked often to him about his work--the work on Plato
-and his philosophy, that he would have liked to accomplish in order to
-complete his lectures. The summer before his death they read together
-some of Plato's dialogues which he had carefully pencilled with his
-notes. He also took to reading Virgil, in which occupation his friend
-frequently joined with him, and this seemed to relieve the languor from
-which he suffered. As to religion, which was a subject on which he
-thought much, although he did not frequently express an opinion,
-Tulloch says: 'He was unable to feel much interest in any of its
-popular forms, but he had a most intense interest in its great
-mysteries, and a thorough reverence for its truths when these were not
-disfigured by superstition and formalism.' Immortality, as we have
-seen, meant to him that there is a permanent and abiding element beyond
-the merely particular and individual which must pass away, and so far
-it was a reality in his mind. God was a real presence in the world, and
-not a far away divinity in whom men believed but whom they could not
-know; but as to the creeds and doctrines of the Church, they seemed far
-removed from the Essential, from true Reality. Professor (afterwards
-Principal) Shairp writes: 'In the visits which I made to his bedroom
-from time to time, when I found him sometimes on chair or sofa,
-sometimes in bed, I never heard one peevish or complaining word escape
-him, nothing but what was calm and cheerful, though to himself as to
-others it was evident that the outward man was fast perishing. The last
-time but one that I saw him was on a Sunday in April. He was sitting up
-in bed. The conversation fell on serious subjects, on the craving the
-soul feels for some strength and support out from and above itself, on
-the certainty that all men feel that need, and on the testimony left by
-those who have tried it most, that they had found that need met by Him
-of whose earthly life the gospel histories bear witness. This, or
-something like this, was the subject on which our conversation turned.
-He paused and dwelt on the thought of the soul's hunger. "Hunger is the
-great weaver in moral things as in physical. The hunger that is in the
-new-born child sits weaving the whole bodily frame, bones and sinews,
-out of nothing. And so I suppose in moral and spiritual things it is
-hunger that builds up the being."'
-
-Professor Veitch, a later colleague at St. Andrews, adds: 'We miss the
-finely-cut decisive face, the erect manly presence, the measured
-meditative step, the friendly greeting. But there are men, and Ferrier
-was one of them, for whom, once known, there is no real past. The
-characteristic features and qualities of such men become part of our
-conscious life; memory keeps them before us living and influential, in
-a higher, truer present which overshadows the actual and visible.' And
-Professor Baynes speaks of him as one of the noblest and most
-pure-hearted men that he had ever known, combining 'a fine ethereal
-intelligence with a most gallant, tender, and courageous spirit.'
-
-Such is the man as he presented himself to his friends even when the
-shadows were darkening and the last long journey coming very near: a
-true man and a good; one in whose footsteps we fain would tread, one
-who makes it easier for those who follow him to tread them too. His
-work was done; it might seem unfinished--what work is ever complete?
-But he had taken his share in it, the little bit that any individual
-man can do, and had done it with all his strength. And what did it
-amount to? Was it worth the labour of so many years of toil? Who is
-there who can reply? And yet we can see something of what has been
-accomplished; we can see that philosophy has been made a more living
-thing for Scotland, that a blow has been struck against materialistic
-creeds, or beliefs which are merely formal and without any true
-convincing power. It may not have been much: the work was but begun,
-and it was left to others to carry that work on. But in philosophy, as
-in the rest, it is the first step that costs, and amid great difficulty
-and considerable opposition Ferrier took that step. He left much
-unexplained; he dwelt too much in the clouds, and did not try to solve
-the real difficulties of personal, individual life; he did not show how
-his high-flown theories worked in a world of strife and struggle, of
-sin and sorrow. He could only be said to have struck a keynote, but
-that keynote as far as it went was true, and the harmonies may be left
-to follow.
-
-
-
-
-"FAMOUS SCOTS" SERIES.
-
-_Some Opinions of the Press on_
-
-ADAM SMITH.
-
-BY HECTOR C. MACPHERSON.
-
-
-"The style is pleasant, and the treatment luminous. The monograph, as a
-whole, should be found attractive and informing."--_Globe._
-
-"Smith's life is briefly and clearly told, and there is a good deal
-of independent criticism interspersed amidst the chapters on the
-philosopher's two principal treatises. Mr. Macpherson's analysis of
-Smith's economic teaching makes excellent reading."--_Echo._
-
-"His personal and intellectual career, so far as the limits of the
-'Famous Scots' Series permitted, is clearly and entertainingly
-presented by Mr. Macpherson."--_Morning Leader._
-
-"The book is of great price. It is complete, proportioned, vivid,
-the picture of a great man, and with all its brevity, worthy of his
-greatness."--_Expository Times._
-
-"Interesting both as a contribution to the literature of political
-economy, and as a sketch of the career of one of Scotland's most
-illustrious sons."--_Publishers' Circular._
-
-"The monograph is a clear and able exposition and criticism of its
-subject. It deserves a prominent place in the series it belongs
-to."--_Bookman._
-
-"An interesting and lively study of the English founder of political
-economy, this little book is remarkable as a whole-hearted vindication
-of the Cobdenic ideas of international policy. The author considers it
-to be Adam Smith's chief achievement that he has demonstrated with
-scientific completeness that Free Trade, as Cobden happily expressed
-it, is the international law of God Almighty."--_Spectator._
-
-"This little book is written with brains and a degree of courage which
-is in keeping with its convictions. It has vision, too, and that counts
-for righteousness, if anywhere, in political economy."--_Speaker._
-
-"A sound and able piece of work, and contains a fair and discerning
-estimate of Smith in his essential character as the author of the
-doctrine of Free Trade, and consequently of the modern science of
-economics."--_Glasgow Herald._
-
-"The writer of this biography deserves to be warmly congratulated on
-the result of his labour. He has written, to my mind at least, one of
-the best of the series of 'Famous Scots,' and has enshrined the author
-of the 'Wealth of Nations' in a manner at once attractive, interesting,
-and instructive."--_Northern Figaro._
-
-"Of Adam Smith the man there are some interesting stories in this
-volume."--_Academy._
-
-"This book is one warmly to be commended as among the very best of a
-notable series."--_Kilmarnock Standard._
-
-"The story of Smith's life is plainly but interestingly told, with
-occasional graphic descriptions of the society of his time; but it
-will undoubtedly be as an exposition of the philosophical questions
-involved that the book will be most highly prized."--_Daily Free
-Press._
-
-"It is a biography with a specific purpose, and this purpose is
-admirably worked out. In some respects, indeed, Mr. Macpherson's object
-is educational. Not content with doing justice to the great master of
-economic science, he shows what we owe to other workers in the same
-school of thought."--_Leeds Mercury._
-
-"Those who have read Mr. Macpherson's 'Thomas Carlyle,' with which
-this highly interesting series was opened, will turn with pleasure and
-expectancy to the volume just issued. Mr. Macpherson has given us a
-volume much above the average of the series both in literary merit and
-thoughtfulness. We strongly recommend this excellent pen-and-ink
-portrait, of the man who gave Britain the key to the wealth of the
-world, of our fellow-students."--_Student._
-
-"One of the best of an admirable series."--_Scots Pictorial._
-
-"An admirable monograph."--_London Daily Mail._
-
-"A thoughtful and capably written monograph."--_Liverpool Daily Post._
-
-"Mr. Macpherson states the facts most admirably, and he has such a
-knowledge of the movements and events of the times in which Smith
-lived that he is able to make an excellent use of them as showing how
-they influenced such a thinker as the author of the 'Wealth of
-Nations,' and how, in turn, he was able to change the trend of the
-thinking of his age."--_Perthshire Courier._
-
-MR. HERBERT SPENCER says: "I have learned much from your sketch of
-Adam Smith's life and work. It presents the essential facts in a lucid
-and interesting way. Especially am I glad to see that you have
-insisted upon the individualistic character of his teaching. It is
-well that his authority on the side of individualism should be put
-forward in these days of rampant Socialism, when the great mass of
-legislative measures extend public agency and restrict private agency;
-the advocates of such measures being blind to the fact that by small
-steps they are bringing about a state in which the citizen will have
-lost all freedom."
-
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of James Frederick Ferrier, by
-Elizabeth Sanderson Haldane
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK JAMES FREDERICK FERRIER ***
-
-***** This file should be named 44949-8.txt or 44949-8.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/4/4/9/4/44949/
-
-Produced by sp1nd and the Online Distributed Proofreading
-Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from
-images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
-
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
-will be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
-one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
-(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
-permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
-set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
-copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
-protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
-Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
-charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
-do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
-rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
-such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
-research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
-practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
-subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
-redistribution.
-
-
-
-*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
- www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
-all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
-If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
-terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
-entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
-and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
-or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
-collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
-individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
-located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
-copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
-works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
-are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
-Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
-freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
-this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
-the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
-keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
-a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
-the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
-before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
-creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
-Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
-the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
-States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
-access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
-whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
-copied or distributed:
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
-from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
-posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
-and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
-or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
-with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
-work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
-through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
-Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
-1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
-terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
-to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
-permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
-word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
-distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
-"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
-posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
-you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
-copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
-request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
-form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
-that
-
-- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
- owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
- has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
- Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
- must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
- prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
- returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
- sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
- address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
- the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or
- destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
- and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
- Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
- money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
- of receipt of the work.
-
-- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
-forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
-both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
-Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
-Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
-collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
-"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
-corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
-property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
-computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
-your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
-your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
-the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
-refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
-providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
-receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
-is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
-opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
-WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
-WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
-If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
-law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
-interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
-the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
-provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
-with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
-promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
-harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
-that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
-or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
-work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
-Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
-
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
-including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
-because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
-people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
-To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
-and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
-Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
-permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
-Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
-throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809
-North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email
-contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
-Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
-SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
-particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
-To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
-with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
-Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
-unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
-keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
-
- www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.